PB97-963125
EPA/541/R-97/069
November 1997
EPA Superfund
Record of Decision Amendment:
United Scrap Lead Co., Inc.
Troy, OH
6/27/1997
-------
U.S. EPA SUPERFUND
RECORD OF DECISION AMENDMENT
UNITED SCRAP LEAD SUPERFUND SITE
CITY OF TROY, CONCORD TOWNSHIP, MIAMI COUNTY, OHIO
JUNE 1997
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DECLARATION FOR THE RECORD OF DECISION AMENDMENT i
RECORD OF DECISION AMENDMENT SUMMARY
I. SITE NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION 1
II. SITE HISTORY AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES 2
III. REASON FOR ROD AMENDMENT 7
IV. HIGHLIGHTS OF COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION 9
V. SUMMARY OF SITE CHARACTERISTICS 9
VI. SUMMARY OF SITE RISKS 10
VII. DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES 12
VIII. COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES 17
IX. SELECTED REMEDY 24
X. ARARs COMPLIANCE AND WAIVER
OF CERTAIN SOLID WASTE REQUIREMENTS 30
XI. STATUTORY DETERMINATION 34
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A - RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY
APPENDIX B - ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
-------
DECLARATION
FOR THE
»
RECORD OF DECISION AMENDMENT
UNITED SCRAP LEAD SUPERFUND SITE
CITY OF TROY, CONCORD TOWNSHIP, MIAMI COUNTY, OHIO
JUNE 1997
-------
DECLARATION FOR THE RECORD OF DECISION AMENDMENT
SITE NAME AND LOCATION
United Scrap Lead ("USL") Superfiind Site, City of Troy, Concord Township. Miami County,
Ohio.
STATEMENT OF BASIS AND PURPOSE
This decision document amends the September 16, 1988, Record of Decision ("ROD") selecting
the final remedial action for the USL Superfiind Site in the City of Troy, Concord Township,
Miami County, Ohio. This action was taken in accordance with the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 ("CERCLA"), as amended by
the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 ("SARA"), and the National Oil
and Hazardous Substances Contingency Plan ("NCP"). The decisions contained herein are based
on information contained in the administrative record for this site. The State of Ohio is expected
to concur with the selected remedy.
ASSESSMENT OF THE REMEDY
Actual or threatened releases of hazardous substances from the site, if not addressed by
implementing the response action selected in this ROD Amendment, may present an imminent
and substantial endangerment to public health, welfare, or the environment.
DESCRIPTION OF THE AMENDMENT
»
The remedy selected in the September 16, 1988, ROD was a final remedy addressing risks
associated with on-site and off-site lead-contaminated soils and on-site lead acid battery casing
chips ("battery casing chips"). Certain components of this selected remedy were implemented in
1992. However, the main source control component, involving an innovative technology for
treatment of the on-site soils and battery casing chips, was not implemented after Predesign, Pilot
Plant and Economic studies indicated serious implementability issues and substantially higher
costs.
The selected remedy in this amendment addresses the remaining on-site lead-contaminated
battery casing chips and soil. The scope of the selected remedy involves the following: (1)
excavation of battery casing chips for treatment and disposal at a U.S. EPA-approved Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA") Subtitle D landfill ("an approved solid waste
landfill"); (2) excavation of the first foot of soils under the battery casing chips pile that exceed
1550 milligrams per kilogram ("mg/kg") lead and that fail the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching
Procedure ("TCLP") standard, will be treated to meet RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions
("LDRs") and disposed off-site in an approved solid waste landfill; and (3) construction of a
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 i
-------
solid waste cover system over the remaining contaminated soils to ensure the future safety of the
groundwater. If, however, all of the battery casing chips are removed and properly disposed of,
and all of the contaminated soils containing lead in excess of 1550 mg/kg lead are removed to the
regional groundwater table and properly disposed of, then construction of a solid waste cover
system would not be required. The proposed alternative remedy will remove the source of direct
contact with lead contamination, and recent analyses have demonstrated the absence of any
groundwater contamination
STATUTORY DETERMINATIONS
The selected remedy in this amendment is protective of human health and the environment,
complies with Federal and State applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements ("ARARs")
and is cost-effective. The selected remedial action utilizes permanent solutions and considered
the use of alternative treatment technologies to the maximum extent practicable. This remedy
satisfies the statutory preference for treatment in CERCLA Section 121 in that all battery casing
chips will be treated to meet RCRA LDRs and disposed off-site in an approved solid waste
landfill. In addition, the first foot of soils under the battery casing chips pile that exceed 1550
mg/kg lead and that fail the TCLP standard will be treated to meet LDRs and disposed off-site in
an approved solid waste landfill.
The proposed alternative 12 protects human health and the environment, is cost-effective and
addresses the CERCLA statutory preference for treatment. Since some soils containing lead in
excess of health-based levels will remain on-site, a review will be conducted to ensure that the
remedy continues to provide adequate protection of human health and the environment within
five years after commencement of the remedial action.
Date • William E. Muno (_„'
Director, Superfund Division
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 ii
-------
U.S. EPA SUPERFUND
RECORD OF DECISION AMENDMENT
UNITED SCRAP LEAD SUPERFUND SITE
CITY OF TROY, CONCORD TOWNSHIP, MIAMI COUNTY, OHIO
JUNE 1997
-------
RECORD OF DECISION AMENDMENT SUMMARY
UNITED SCRAP LEAD SUPERFUND SITE
CITY OF TROY, CONCORD TOWNSHIP, MIAMI COUNTY, OHIO
I. STTE NAME. LOCATION. AND DESCRIPTIOM
The United Scrap Lead Superfund ("USL") Site is located
approximately one mile south of the City of Troy, Concord Township,
Miami County in central west Ohio. The Site occupies approximately
25 acres of land. The process facilities and lead acid battery
casing chips ("battery casing chips") disposal area currently
occupy about 8 acres. This is the area to be remediated.
The Site is located in a lightly populated area. The Site consists
of three general areas: an open flat area in the northern half of
the Site, a wooded area in the southeast quarter, and the southwest
quarter where the offices, process buildings, and waste disposal
areas were located. The Site lies entirely within the floodplain
of the Great Miami River. Groundwater elevations are normally 3 to
10 feet below the ground surface except during periods of heavy
precipitation when flooding occurs. The Miami Conservancy District
("MCD") is responsible for preserving flood control along the Miami
River Basin. The Site is located in the 10, 50, 100, and 500 year
floodplains as defined by the MCD. The southeastern portion of the
Site is frequently underwater after significant rainfall events.
The last occurrence was August 1995. Surface Site drainage is
generally in a south-easterly direction towards a. culvert that
discharges in a channel ("Tributary to Island 3" or "McKaig Ditch")
that forms the southern boundary of the Site. The lands north and
south of the Site are farm fields. The northern boundary of the
Site is bordered by a gravel road. The east edge is bordered by a
line of the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad with wooded areas beyond. To
the west, the Site is bounded by four residential/business
properties and by County Road 25-A.
The topography and surficial geology of the Troy, Ohio area is
dominated by glacial deposits. Bedrock beneath Troy consists of
calcareous shales with thin limestones. The Site is covered by a
thin mantle of cohesive soils overlying sand and gravel deposits
containing variable amounts of silt, clay and cobbles.
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997
-------
II. SITE HISTORY AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES
Operations began in 1946 as a sole proprietorship with Edward
Bailen as the owner. The company recovered lead components from
used automobile and industry batteries transported to the Site.
The lead components were then sold and shipped by rail to lead
smelters for salvage. Battery tops and battery casing chips were
disposed.of on-site. Battery acid was collected and discharged
directly on the ground on-site. The business was incorporated as
United Scrap Lead, Inc. in 1964. In 1972, the State of Ohio
Department of Health required the owners to install an acid
treatment system to neutralize the acid waste prior to discharging
to the seepage field.
In 1979, the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency ("Ohio EPA")
found levels of cadmium and lead in the groundwater exceeding then
existing Federal interim primary drinking water standards. In an
attempt to correct the problem, as well as to comply with the Ohio
EPA's solid waste disposal regulations, the Site management
installed an acid storage tank on-site and began to dispose of
shredded battery casing chips off-site. Lead reclamation
operations ceased in 1980.
After the termination of the lead reclamation operations, a new
corporation was formed and the Site was leased to other parties.
By January 1982, the Site was being used for a battery casing
reclaiming operation, i.e., the battery casing chips were shipped
off-site for extraction of residual lead, with the battery casing
chips returned to the Site after the extraction process was
completed. In 1983, this operation was stopped when it was
determined that the battery casing chips that remained after
processing were hazardous and thus had to be disposed of in
accordance with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
("RCRA"). Also, physicians tested employees' blood and found high
levels of lead. In September 1984, the Site was placed on the
National Priority List under the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act ("CERCLA").
In 1985, a United States Environmental Protection Agency ("U.S.
EPA") Emergency Removal Action was conducted to remove and relocate
contaminated soils and waste materials, to the east, away from the
immediate vicinity of the surrounding residences and roadway. Such
wastes included: rubber and plastic battery casing chips, pieces of
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 2
-------
the lead components from the batteries, lead paste and lead-
contaminated soils. In addition to the consolidated pile of waste
battery casing chips and components, several abandoned buildings
were located on-site. Accumulations of debris, including empty
drums, fiberglass tanks, vehicles, wooden pallets, and trash, were
noted at several locations.
The U.S. EPA conducted a Remedial Investigation at the Site during
the period January, 1986 to February, 1988. In August, 1988, the
Feasibility Study was completed.
A Record of Decision ("ROD") was signed by the U.S. EPA on
September 16, 1988. The selected remedy included an innovative
treatment technology then under development by the U.S. Department
of Interior-Bureau of Mines ("BOM"), which involved the treatment
of both battery casing chips and contaminated soils to remove and
recycle lead. The goal of the remedy was a permanent resolution to
restore the land to its original state. The major components of
this overall Site remedy included:
- Treatment of battery casing chips on-site (washing with lead
recovery) with off-site disposal of residuals in a solid waste
landfill if a recycler could not be found;
- Treatment of contaminated on-site soils (washing with lead
recovery) with total lead concentrations greater than 500
milligrams per kilogram ("mg/kg" - parts per million or wppm") or
which exceeded the EP-toxicity standard for lead under the battery
casing chips pile) with residual soils (non-hazardous) placed back
on-site;
- Covering treated soils with clean fill, followed by revegetation;
- Excavation of certain off-site soils (location and volume to be
determined during remedial design) and consolidation of these soils
with the treated soils on-site, to be covered with clean fill;
*
- Dewatering of sediments from McKaig Ditch, consolidation on-site
with treated soils, and covering with clean fill;
- Decontamination and off-site disposal of buildings/facilities and
debris in a solid waste landfill;
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997
-------
- Installation of new residential well provided for an adjacent
residence and the former USL office building;
- Deed restrictions;
- Control of Site drainage; and
- Monitoring of groundwater and surface water both during remedial
action and for a minimum of two years following.
The Pre-Design Studies were developed by the BOM, and were to be
implemented by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ("USAGE").
On July 31, 1991, the United States filed a complaint in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, (United
States v. Atlas Lederer Co.. et al.), pursuant to section 107 of
CERCLA to recover from various potentially responsible parties
("PRPs") the costs that had been incurred by the United States to
that date in responding to contamination at the Site, and to obtain
a declaratory judgment regarding the PRPs'/Defendants' liability
for future response costs to be incurred in connection with the
Site. By Order dated December 2, 1991, the Court stayed all
further proceedings in the Atlas Lederer matter to allow the
parties to explore settlement. The stay resulted in part from the
PRPs'/Defendants' desire to explore other remedial technologies.
On September 12, 1991, an Administrative Order by Consent was
executed under which certain PRPs constructed a fence around the
perimeter of the Site to prohibit access. This action was an
emergency protective measure to eliminate direct contact with the
hazardous materials at the Site.
In November 1991, the USAGE completed the Pre-Design Report. This
report included additional field sampling necessary for complete
characterization and identification of all materials such as
contaminated soil and battery casing chips present at the Site and
fully defined the extent of contamination. Also, current Site
conditions were evaluated.
By June, 1992, the USAGE had completed the plans for construction
of a pilot plant for treatment of the battery casing chips and
contaminated soils, along with an economic analysis report. The
plans and reports provided the details of the design, feasibility
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 4
-------
and cost associated with the original ROD remedy for the on-site
contaminated soils and battery casing chips. The cost-estimates
for the operation of the pilot plant and the ultimate treatment of
the contaminated soils and battery casing chips were substantially
higher than those considered during the remedy selection process.
At this time the U.S. EPA decided to cease development of the
innovative technology and to consider other alternatives to address
the soils and battery casing chips (See detailed discussion below
in Section III, Reason for ROD Amendment).
In August 1992, the U.S. EPA proceeded to implement certain
components of the 1988 ROD remedy while the other components were
being reconsidered. This first phase of the remedial action
("Phase I - RA") addressed off-site contaminated areas, secured on-
site soils and battery casing chips, and also secured other Site-
related areas, so that neither the public health nor the
environment would be affected during the transition period between
remedies. This Phase I - RA consisted of the following components:
»• Excavation of Off-Site Soils: Off-site contaminated soils with
lead concentration levels above 210 ppm, were removed in the
following areas of concern: the backyard of a nearby residence; the
lot of a used car business; and along the Site access road. These
soils were combined with on-site materials. Verification sampling
was performed, once excavation was completed.
» Replacement of Off-Site Soils: Off-site contaminated soils were
replaced with clean soils and returned to original grade and
vegetation.
*• Cover Soils and Battery Casing Chips: Stockpiled soils and
battery casing chips were covered with dust control tarpaulins.
One year after this action was taken, the stockpiled soils and
battery casing chips were leveled out over the existing area of
contaminated soils, since these piles had become an attractive
nuisance to children and young adults in the area.
* Installation of Residential Well: A new residential well was
installed for an adjacent residence and the former USL Office
Building. The newly installed residential well was sampled to
ensure proper installation.
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997
-------
* Decontamination. Removal and Disposal; Two on-site buildings were
decontaminated, removed, and disposed of off-site.
*• Removal and Disposal: All drums and debris located on-site were
removed and disposed of off-site.
* Installation of a Septic Tank System: A new septic tank system
was installed for the USL office property.
The Phase I - RA was conducted by the USAGE, through an interagency
agreement with the U.S. EPA, and was completed in March, 1995. A
detailed outline of this action is available in the Superfund Fact
Sheet published in July 1992. The USAGE submitted the final report
for the Phase I - RA, dated December 8, 1995, to the U.S. EPA
Region 5 Superfund Division, in December 1995. With the Phase I -
RA addressing the off-site contamination and on-site buildings and
debris, only on-site contaminated soil and battery casing chips
(within the area fenced during the 1991 emergency action), remain
to be remediated. However, a small area of contaminated material
was left in place around the former USL Office building (currently
the Pro Car Care building), and a forced sewer system. Excavation
around the former USL Office building was stopped so that the
structural integrity of the building was not compromised. The
remaining contamination is located between the Pro Car Care
building and County Road 25A. This area is currently covered with
asphalt. If the road is to be widened, the sewer system replaced,
or the building demolished, additional activities shall be
conducted at that time to ensure any contamination that may exist
is remediated.
In September 1994, the U.S. EPA issued a Proposed Plan for an
amendment to the ROD. The proposed amendment recommended a
different remedy for the battery casing chips and contaminated
soils (Alternative 7) , in lieu of the BOM treatment remedy
(Alternative 6) . The U.S. EPA recommended Alternative 7 (See
Section VII, Description of Alternatives, below). This proposed
plan was never finalized.
On January 27, 1997, the U.S. EPA issued a second proposed plan for
a ROD Amendment recommending a new Alternative 12. This ROD
Amendment adopts the recommended alternative in the January 27,
1997, proposed plan.
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997
-------
III. REASON FOR ROD AMENDMENT
In June, 1992, the USAGE completed the plans for construction of a
pilot plant for treatment of the battery casing chips and
contaminated soils, along with an economic analysis report. The
plans and reports provided the details of the design, feasibility
and cost associated with the original ROD remedy for the on-site
contaminated soils and battery casing chips. The cost-estimates
for the operation of the pilot plant and the ultimate treatment of
the contaminated soils and battery casing chips were substantially
higher than those considered during the remedy selection process.
Those cost estimates indicated that it would require $10-million to
operate the pilot plant for 2 years and that subsequent RA costs
would be in excess of $100-million (based upon a cleanup level of
500 mg/kg lead in soil).
This increase in costs was primarily due to the increased residence
time required to adequately treat the battery casing chips and
contaminated soils to meet the 500 mg/kg lead cleanup level,
subsequently increasing the overall project duration from an
estimated 6 months to over 2 years. In addition, the costs of
building the on-site treatment plant were significantly higher than
originally anticipated due to the need to add treatment processes
to reduce the size of the battery casing chips, in order to
optimize the extraction of lead. There were also technical
handling problems and increased costs due to treating the clay-like
soils at the Site. Finally, it was acknowledged that the BOM
technology was not proven beyond the bench scale, and therefore,
the costs would continue to be subject to extreme variation.
Therefore, the U.S. EPA conducted an Alternative Analysis Study
("AAS") to evaluate other cleanup options.
As a result of the AAS, the U.S. EPA issued a Proposed Plan for a
ROD Amendment in September 1994. The U.S. EPA recommended
Alternative 7 (See Section VII, Description of Alternatives,
below), which involved the use of an off-site lead smelter to treat
the battery casing chips. The U.S. EPA chose this option because
it would recycle the lead from the battery casing chips, and
because it was thought that the battery casing chips had to be
treated at a lead smelter in order to comply with the applicable or
relevant and appropriate requirements ("ARARs"). However, the lead
smelters would only accept the battery casing chips, not the
contaminated soils. The U.S. EPA, therefore, still would be
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 7
-------
required to stabilize the contaminated soils, and cap those soils
in-place.
Substantial comments were received from the PRPs/Defendants in the
Atlas Lederer Case, with regard to the implementability of the
remedy proposed in the September 1994 Proposed Plan, whether the
proposed lead smelter was in compliance with environmental
regulations, and the cost of the proposed action. In addition, the
PRPs/Defendants continued to express their concern over the use of
innovative technologies at the USL Site that tend to turn into
"research" projects. They continued to recommend a chemical
fixation/stabilization remedy that would include a cap.
The U.S. EPA reevaluated its selection of Alternative 7 because it
was determined that due to the economics of the lead smelter
business, the U.S. EPA would have to pay substantial increased
costs to have the battery casing chips processed, including loss of
production time at a smelter due to the low concentration and
recoverability of lead in the battery casing chips. The U.S. EPA
also had difficulty locating a lead smelter of appropriate size
that was in full compliance with Federal and State regulations,
that would agree to process the battery casing chips. There were
also other lead acid battery breaking sites throughout the Midwest,
similar to the USL Site, that were evaluating more cost-effective
treatment options. Subsequent discussions between the U.S. EPA and
the Ohio EPA determined that it was not necessary to send the
battery casing chips to a lead smelter in order to comply with
ARARs, since the battery casing chips were not subject to the RCRA
Land Disposal Restriction ("LDRs") for lead acid batteries.
Therefore, the September 1994 Proposed Plan was never finalized.
Discussions subsequently focused on the need to identify an
alternative remedy for the contaminated soil and battery casing
chips which is both protective of human health and the environment,
and cost effective. Other entities were invited to participate in
the discussions, including the Ohio EPA, the USAGE (as consultant
for the U.S. EPA), and ENTACT, Inc. (the PRPs/Defendants
consultant). Other parties, such as the MCD have been consulted
concerning certain elements of the various proposals under
consideration. The resulting selective alternative is discufsed in
Section VII below.
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997
-------
IV. HIGHLIGHTS OF COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
Various public meetings and availability sessions have been held by
the U.S. EPA in Troy, Ohio between 1987 and the present to discuss
the general progress of the Site.
In September 1994, the U.S. EPA issued a Proposed Plan for a Record
of Decision Amendment. The U.S. EPA provided a public comment
period on the September 1994, Proposed Plan from October 3, 1994,
through November 2, 1994, and conducted an evening public meeting
on the USL Proposed Plan on October 20, 1994, in the City of Troy.
On October 9, 1996, the U.S. EPA conducted Community Involvement
Plan interviews of residents and local government officials to
update the public regarding Site activities.
The U.S. EPA issued a second Proposed Plan for a ROD Amendment for
the Site on January 27, 1997. The U.S. EPA provided a public
comment period on this Proposed Plan from January 27, 1997, through
February 25, 1997, and conducted an evening public meeting on the
USL Proposed Plan on February 19, 1997, in the City of Troy. The
U.S. EPA's response to the public comments received are summarized
in the attached Responsiveness Summary, which is Attachment A of
this ROD Amendment. This ROD Amendment will become part of the
Administrative Record pursuant to the National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Contingency Plan ("NCP") Section 300.825(a)(2). The
Administrative Record can be found at the Site repositories located
at:
1) Troy-Miami County Public Library
419 West Main Street
Troy, OH
2) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Records Center, 7th Floor
77 West Jackson Blvd.
Chicago, IL
V. SUMMARY OP SITE CHARACTERISTICS
The principal contaminant of concern is lead in soil and lead in
battery casing chips. Lead concentrations range from 42 to 377,000
mg/kg. Arsenic was also found on-site with concentrations ranging
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 9
-------
from 21 to 444 mg/kg. Since the arsenic is co'-located with lead,
the selected remedial action for the lead will also address the
arsenic contaminated soils. The contaminated soils on-site
represent a continuing source of lead contamination for off-site
soils, and possibly the waters and sediments of McKaig Ditch. Soil
is the primary medium impacted by lead.
During the 1988 Remedial Investigation ("RI"), lead was detected in
groundwater from two of seven commercial/residential wells, and in
groundwater from one of 12 monitoring wells sampled. The lead
concentration in groundwater from the monitoring well exceeded the
then existing interim primary drinking water standard, which was 50
micrograms per liter ("ug/1") at the time the ROD was signed.
However, no lead was detected in a filtered sample from the same
monitoring well. In addition, no lead was detected in unfiltered
and filtered groundwater samples obtained in 1995 and 1996 using
low flow purging and sampling methodology not used previously,
which minimizes turbidity. This indicates that the lead that was
detected during the 1988 RI was due to turbidity, related to the
techniques used to sample the groundwater.
There is currently no drinking water standard for lead, but rather
a technology-based action level of 15 parts per billion ("ppb") at
the tap. Although current sampling and analysis indicate that lead
is not migrating with groundwater, continued monitoring of the
groundwater and removal of the majority of the source of lead will
minimize any potential future impact to the groundwater.
VI. SUMMARY OP SITE RISKS
Lead is considered the primary contaminant of concern at the Site,
and occurs mainly as metallic lead or lead compounds associated
with lead-contaminated battery casing chips and lead-contaminated
soils. Other metals (arsenic and antimony) found in the former
process area at the Site have been found to be co-located with the
lead.
Since there is evidence of on-going trespassing at the Site by
local residents, it can be assumed that exposures have occurred and
continue to occur at the Site. The greatest risk is to human
health, with the current risk from ingestion and inhalation of
lead-contaminated soils and the potential for future groundwater
contamination if the source materials remain on-site. Direct and
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 10
-------
indirect contact to environmental media contaminated by a release
from the Site has the potential to result in lead exposure from the
inadvertent ingestion and inhalation of soil and dust. Receptors
include humans, animals, and plants.
Lead exposure in children may result in learning disabilities
caused by central nervous system depression. Also, the potential
exists for an increased risk of exposure of the nearby population
via the migration of contaminated media by flooding. Removal of
the source material (i.e., battery casing chips and lead-
contaminated soils) from the Site would reduce the possibility that
the source material could impact the groundwater aquifer and water
supply to adjacent residences. There are no apparent threatened or
endangered species in the immediate vicinity of the Site, but there
are common flora and fauna present.
The original ROD, assuming that the Site would contain residences,
adopted a 500 mg/kg lead in soil clean-up level, which was based on
then current U.S. EPA guidance. Based upon the Site's historical
and anticipated future use as a light commercial/industrial
property, the U.S. EPA, "in consultation with the Ohio EPA,
determined that a lead cleanup level based upon residential use
assumptions was not appropriate for this Site.
The U.S. EPA, in consultation with the Ohio EPA, allowed the PRPs
to conduct a revised risk assessment for on-site soils using a
model developed by the U.S. EPA's Technical Review Workgroup for
Lead entitled "Methodology for Assessing Risks Associated with
Adult Exposures to Lead in Soil", and site-specific exposure
scenarios. The Model assesses nonresidential adult risks for lead
utilizing a methodology which relates soil lead intake to blood
lead concentrations and is designed to develop cleanup goals which
protect the developing fetus of a Site worker (woman of
childbearing age) from adverse health effects of exposure to lead.1
This Model was used to estimate the soil lead concentration at
which the probability of blood lead concentrations in fetuses of
women exposed to environmental lead exceeding 10 micrograms per
1 The primary basis for the algorithms in the U.S. EPA Adult Lead Model used to calculate the
cleanup level is that fetuses and neonates are a highly sensitive population with respect to the adverse
effects of lead on development and that 10 ug/dL is considered to be a blood lead level of concern from
the standpoint of protecting the health of sensitive populations.
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 11
-------
deciliter ("ug/dL") blood lead would be less than 5 percent.2 The
PRPs/Defendants submitted a revised risk assessment dated September
19, 1996, which the U.S. EPA, in consultation with the Ohio EPA
subsequently approved.
Based upon its analysis of the results of this risk assessment, and
since the Site is currently zoned 1-1, industrial district within
the county and will be deed-restricted for that use, the U.S. EPA,
in consultation with the Ohio EPA, has established a level of 1550
mg/kg lead in soil as a cleanup level (concentration of lead in
soil not to be exceeded) for on-site soils. An Ecological
Evaluation completed by USAGE in January 1997 determined that the
relatively low level of post-remedial residual ecological risk
would not be unacceptable. This report is included in the
Administrative Record for the Site.
VII. DESCRIPTION OP ALTERNATIVES
In the January 1997 Proposed Plan for a ROD Amendment, the U.S. EPA
re-considered the seven alternatives from the September 1994
Proposed Plan for a ROD Amendment (Alternatives 1, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10,
and 11) and added a new Alternative 12. All alternatives were
revised to reflect the 1550 mg/kg lead in soil cleanup level, as
well as to update the 1986 costs and make them consistent with 1996
construction costs. The Administrative Record has been updated to
include documents supporting Alternative 12.
Alternative 1: No Action
The CERCLA requires that the "No Action" alternative be evaluated
at every site to establish a baseline for comparison. This
alternative assumes that all lead-contaminated media remains in
place as-is. The cost is based upon the cost of groundwater
monitoring.
2- The U.S. EPA Technical Review Workgroup for Lead reported that the weight-of-evidence from the
scientific literature suggests that delayed or impaired neurodevelopment during the first 12 months of
postnatal life can be associated with maternal blood lead levels during pregnancy or neonatal blood lead
levels at birth. A biood lead level of 10 ug/dL was recommended, based on the assumption that the blood
lead level of concern for fetuses is the same as that for children. This position is supported in the National
Research Council Committee on Measuring Lead Exposure in Infants, Children, and Other Sensitive
Populations Report (NRC 1993).
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 12
-------
Total Costs (30 Years): $ 525,000
Alternative 4: Ex-Situ Stabilization/Solidification of Battery
Casing Chips and Soils with On-Site Nonhazardous Waste Landfill
Disposal
This alternative consists of excavation and stockpiling of battery
casing chips and soils; ex-situ stabilization/solidification of
each media (soil and battery casing chips) using cement, cement
kiln dust, or fly ash, disposal of the stabilized battery casing
chips and the stabilized soils in an on-site landfill, and
construction of a permanent levee around the Site to protect
against flooding and infiltration. The additional operation and
maintenance ("O&M") costs for Alternative 4 versus Alternative 1,
are based upon O&M costs of a landfill cover, as well as the costs
of groundwater monitoring.
Total Capital Costs: $9,100,000
O&M Costs (30 years): $ 700,000
Total Costs: $9,800,000
Alternative 6: Battery Casing Chips Treatment using BOM process
with Off-Site Nonhazardous Waste Landfill Disposal; Soils Treatment
using BOM Process with On-Site Debris Landfill Disposal
This alternative was selected in the original ROD. It consists of
excavation and stockpiling of battery casing chips and soils,
treatment of each media in an on-site treatment system using the
lead-removal process developed by the BOM, off-site disposal of the
treated battery casing chips residuals, delivery of recovered lead
to a smelting process, and replacement and compaction of the
treated clean soils back on-site. The battery casing chips
treatment would be completed first. The same treatment equipment
and process steps, with the exception of some differences in
initial size reduction steps, would be used to process both the
battery casing chips and soil. The process involves washing to
remove lead sulfate sludge, carbonation, extraction of lead using
fluosilicic acid, and recovery of lead from the acid solution by
electrowinning. This alternative involves an innovative technology
that has not been demonstrated beyond the bench-scale.
Total Capital Costs: $74,000,000
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 13
-------
Alternative 7: Battery Casing Chips Disposal at Secondary Lead
Smelter; In-Situ Stabilization and Capping of the Contaminated
Soils
This alternative consists of excavation and transportation of
untreated battery casing chips to a secondary lead smelter for lead
recovery, and in-place (in-situ) stabilization and capping of the
contaminated soils. Soils would be stabilized by injection of
cement and in-place mixing. The area of stabilized soils would
then be capped with a clay, HOPE liner, soil, and vegetative cover.
Also, a levee would be constructed around the area where
contaminated material is left on-site.
Total Capital Costs: $15,600,000
O&M Costs (30 years): $ 700,000
Total Costs: $16,300,000
Alternative 8: Battery Casing Chips Disposal at Secondary Lead
Smelter; Capping of Contaminated Soils
This alternative is a replica of Alternative 7 with the exception
that all contaminated soils with a lead concentration above 1550
mg/kg would be capped in place without stabilization..
Total Capital Costs: $12,400,000
O&M Costs (30 years): $ 700,000
Total Costs: $13,100,000
Alternative 10: Canonie Battery Casing Chips Washing Process;
Stabilization/Solidification of Contaminated Soils; Disposal of
Battery Casing Chips and Soil at Off-Site Nonhazardous Haste
Landfill
This alternative consists of physical treatment of the stockpiled
battery casing chips and ex-situ stabilization/solidification of
soils that fail the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure
("TCLP") test. The battery casing chips would be treated using the
Canonie treatment process. The Canonie process involves size
reduction, heavy-media gravity separation, and sequential washing
stages that would separate the battery casing chips by size and
density. Contaminated soils would be stabilized on-site using
cement kiln fines and cement. Water for the stabilization process
would be supplied directly from the Canonie battery casing chips
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 14
-------
washing process; therefore, no wastewater discharge is involved.
Because of the ability of these combined processes to minimize
water supply and discharge requirements, it is assumed that the two
processes would be conducted simultaneously. Finally, both treated
battery casing chips and stabilized soils would be transported off-
site to an approved solid waste landfill. This alternative would
take 2 years to implement.
Total Capital Costs: $21,800,000
O&M Costs (30 years): $ 700,000
Total Costs: $22,500,000
Alternative 11: Construction of Vertical Barrier Around and Capping
of Soils and Battery Casing Chips
This alternative is based exclusively on containment with
groundwater monitoring. All the wastes present on the Site would
remain in place. Vertical barriers (slurry walls) would be
constructed around the areas of soil contamination to prevent the
horizontal flow of groundwater through the contaminated material.
The battery casing chips stockpiles would be leveled off and
contoured to allow the construction of a clay solid waste cover
system over the contaminated battery casing chips and contaminated
soil areas. A levee would be constructed on-site around the area
where contaminated material has been left in place.
Total Capital Costs: $5,200,000
O&M Costs (30 years): $ 700,000
Total Costs: $5,900,000
Alternative 12: Ex-situ Stabilization of Battery Casing Chips;
Disposal of Stabilized Battery Casing Chips and Contaminated Soils
at an Approved Solid Waste Landfill.
This is the alternative recommended in the January 1997 Proposed
Plan for a ROD Amendment. The following remedial actions required
by the original ROD remain the same: Monitoring of Surface Waters,
Air, and Groundwater; Clean Fill and Revegetate; and Fencing. The
proposed alternative (more fully described below in Section IX,
Selected Remedy) involves the following:
• Battery Casing Chips - Excavation of all battery casing chips,
with two treatment options: treatment on-site to meet LDRs; or
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 15
-------
transportation to a RCRA Subtitle C treatment, storage, and
disposal facility (na permitted TSDF") for treatment to meet the
LDRs. The treated battery casing chips will be disposed in an
approved solid waste landfill.
• Contaminated Soils Under Battery Casing Chips Pile - Excavation
of the first foot of soils that exceeds 1550 mg/kg lead, and
disposal off-site at an approved solid waste landfill. Any soils
transported off-site would be subject to the TCLP test to determine
whether or not those soils are RCRA-characteristic for lead and
thus require treatment to meet LDRs prior to disposal. Treatment
of soils on-site to meet LDRs, or treatment at a permitted TSDF to
meet the LDRs. The treated soils will be disposed of in an
approved solid waste landfill. Tested soils that do not exceed the
TCLP standard for lead can be disposed without treatment in an
approved solid waste landfill.
Any soils below this first foot in excess of 1550 mg/kg lead, to a
depth of the regional groundwater table, shall be either excavated
and disposed of as described above, or consolidated under a solid
waste cover system that complies with the Ohio EPA requirements set
forth at the State of Ohio Administrative Code ("OAC") 3745-27-08.
* Other On-Site Soils (Outside Perimeter of Battery Casing Chips
Pile. But Within Original Area of Contamination) - Excavation of
on-site soils above the regional groundwater table that exceed the
1550 mg/kg lead cleanup level. These soils may be: (l)
Consolidated on-site under a solid waste cover system; or (2)
Disposed off-site at an approved solid waste landfill as described
above (subject to the TCLP test and treatment, if necessary) .
• Implementation of an extensive groundwater monitoring program
plan in two phases: Phase I during the RD/RA; and Phase II, once
construction of the remedy is complete.
• Institution of deed restrictions or other institutional controls
to: protect the integrity of any solid waste cover system, or
disturbance of soil below the groundwater table; and to ensure that
the small area of contaminated material that was left in place
around the former USL Office building (currently the Pro Car Care
building), and the forced sewer system, is properly remediated in
the event that the road is widened, the sewer system replaced, or
the building demolished.
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 16
-------
• Construction of appropriate engineering controls to ensure
adequate Site drainage, to ensure against the migration of
contaminants due to flooding, and to ensure the integrity of the
solid waste cover system is maintained.
Total Capital Costs: $16,000,000
O&M Costs (30 years): $ 700,000
Total Costs: $16,700,000
VIII. COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OP ALTERNATIVES
The following nine criteria are used to evaluate cleanup
alternatives and provide the basis for selection of the final
cleanup action at Superfund sites. The following comparison of
alternatives considers the options for battery casing chips and
soil.
1. Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment
{addresses whether a remedy provides adequate protection of human
health and the environment and describes how risks posed through
each exposure pathway are eliminated, reduced or controlled through
treatment, engineering controls or institutional controls)
Alternative 1 only proposes to monitor groundwater for the presence
of lead. Therefore the risks from exposure to lead in the soils
and battery casing chips are still present. "No action" provides
no overall protection of human health and the environment and
therefore is eliminated from further analysis.
Alternative 4, which provides for the battery casing chips as well
as the soils to be stabilized prior to landfilling on-site, is
protective to the extent that capping eliminates the direct contact
threat, and stabilization with capping reduces the potential for
lead to leach from the battery casing chips and soils to the
groundwater. However, there is concern with leaving stabilized
battery casing chips and soils on-site in a floodplain, since the
source of lead remains on-site, subject to repeated wet/dry cycling
due to weathering, which has not been evaluated, and would require
further analysis.
Alternative 6 has the greatest potential for removal of the source
contamination from the environment; however, this is an innovative
technology that has not been demonstrated beyond the bench-scale.
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 17
-------
Alternative 7 would provide greater overall protectiveness than
Alternative 4 by removing the battery casing chips from the Site.
However, although in-situ stabilization would probably decrease the
mobility of the lead in the soil, under certain conditions of
wet/dry cycling due to weathering, it might increase the mobility
of the lead in the soil, as well as cause or provide for the
potential release of the stabilization agent (phosphate) into the
groundwater.
Alternative 8 would provide overall protectiveness for the battery
casing chips by removal. Alternative 8 does not involve
stabilization or treatment of the contaminated soils, which are
simply capped in place.
Alternative 10 would provide overall protectiveness through
treatment to completely remove the source of lead contamination
from the Site.
Alternative 11 would reduce the potential for surface exposure and
migration by providing horizontal and vertical barriers. However,
this alternative clearly would not offer the degree of protection
provided by treatment or removal technologies because the
contaminated soils and battery casing chips remain on-site.
The proposed alternative 12 would be protective of human health and
the environment because the source of lead from the battery casing
chips would be removed from the Site, treated to meet LDRs, and
disposed of properly in an approved solid waste landfill. In
addition, the first foot of soil under the existing battery casing
chips pile, which is contaminated with lead in excess of 1550 mg/kg
lead, would also be treated (if they failed the TCLP test) either
on-site or at an off-site permitted TSDF to meet LDRs, followed by
disposal at an approved solid waste landfill off-site. All
contaminated soils in excess of 1550 mg/kg lead that are above the
regional groundwater table, and that were not consolidated under a
solid waste cover system, would also be excavated and treated (if
they failed the TCLP test) either on-site or at an off-site
permitted TSDF to meet LDRs, followed by disposal in an approved
solid waste landfill off-site. Alternative 12 would, therefore,
remove a higher percentage of the total lead contamination at the
Site, than Alternative 8. Finally, part of the remedy under
Alternative 12 is an aggressive groundwater monitoring program, to
protect the local aquifer from contamination from lead.
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 18
-------
2. Compliance with Applicable and Relevant and Appropriate
Requirements ("ARARs") {addresses how the proposed alternatives
comply with pertinent Federal and State environmental laws and/or
justifies a waiver} The ARARs with which each alternative must
comply are detailed in the AAS.
Alternatives 4, 6, and 10 would comply with all ARARs through
excavation and stabilization or treatment, if implementable, of all
battery casing chips and soils prior to disposal in an approved
solid waste landfill.
Alternative 11 would not comply with Ohio EPA Solid Waste Landfill
capping requirements. It would also leave untreated battery casing
chips and soils exceeding risk-based levels in place on-site, and,
therefore, this Alternative's ability to comply with location-
specific ARARs is doubtful.
Alternative 7 would comply with all ARARs associated with both
excavation and disposal of battery casing chips and stabilization
and capping of soils under a solid waste cover.
Alternative 8 would leave untreated contaminated soils on-site
exceeding risk-based levels, and therefore this alternative's
ability to comply with location-specific ARARs is doubtful.
Alternative 12 would comply with all ARARs associated with
excavation, treatment and disposal of battery casing chips and
soils, and with Ohio EPA Solid Waste Landfill capping requirements.
Alternatives 1 and 11 have been excluded from further analysis
because they definitely fail to comply with ARARs.
3. Long-term Effectiveness and Permanence {refers to the ability
of a remedy to maintain reliable protection of human health and the
environment over time}
Alternative 4 exhibits long-term effectiveness and permanence
because it involves stabilization/solidification of contaminated
soils and battery casing chips and disposal in an on-site solid
waste landfill. There is concern, however, with long-term
effectiveness of leaving stabilized battery casing chips on-site in
the floodplain.
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 19
-------
If Alternative 6 were shown to be implementable, it would readily
meet this criterion. However, this alternative is of questionable
implementability.
Alternative 7 and 8 would provide long-term effectiveness and
permanence. The concern with the long-term effectiveness of
leaving stabilized battery casing chips in a flood plain is
addressed through their removal from the Site. However,
Alternative 8 would leave a large amount of un-stabilized soils
exceeding the cleanup level on-site, requiring reliance on vigilant
monitoring and maintenance of the cap to ensure its continued long-
term integrity.
Alternative 10 would ensure long-term effectiveness and permanence
because both battery casing chips and soils would be treated and
disposed of off-site.
Alternative 12, the proposed alternative, would provide a very
effective permanent solution in that 95 percent or more of the on-
site contamination would be removed from the Site. This
alternative would remove the direct contact threat from
contaminated soils above the regional groundwater table, and
battery casing chips through treatment and off-site disposal, or
consolidation of contaminated soils under a solid waste cover
system. The potential for solid waste cover system failure would
be minimized through a program of regular solid waste cover system
maintenance, as well as engineering controls designed to ensure
adequate Site drainage, to control against the migration of
contaminants due to flooding, as well as to ensure that the
integrity of the solid waste cover system is maintained. In
addition, an aggressive groundwater monitoring program and, if
necessary, corrective action would be required that would ensure
the future protection of the aquifer.
4. Reduction of Toxicity, Mobility, or Volume Through Treatment
{evaluates an alternative's use of treatment to reduce the harmful
nature of contaminants, the environment, and the amount of
contamination present)
Alternative 4 would reduce mobility, but would increase the volume
of waste. However, due to size reduction activities which would
precede stabilization of the battery casing chips, the volume
increase is expected to be minimal.
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 20
-------
While Alternative 6 exhibits a great potential for the removal of
lead from the environment through treatment, the ability to
implement the technology has not been demonstrated.
Alternatives 7 and 8 remove lead from the environment through the
secondary smelting process for the lead-contaminated battery casing
chips. For Alternative 7 the contaminated soils would be
stabilized in place and capped. Alternative 8, however, wou]^d not
include stabilization of the soils prior to capping.
In Alternative 10, reduction in toxicity and mobility of the lead
in both battery casing chips and contaminated soils would be
achieved through stabilization. However, the treatment process
would increase volume, and decrease mobility.
The proposed Alternative 12 would provide for reduction in
toxicity, and mobility through treatment by means of a demonstrated
stabilization technology. Mobility of the contaminated soils left
in place would be decreased through containment, not treatment.
The proposed alternative would be effective in realizing the CERCLA
statutory preference for treatment of the contaminated battery
casing chips and the first foot (most contaminated) of soil
underneath the battery casing chips pile.
5. Short-term Effectiveness {addresses the ability of alternatives
to manage risks during construction and implementation phases, and
reduce immediate risks posed by the hazardous materials present}
The primary short-term risk posed by Alternative 12 would be the
exposure potential created during excavation, treatment and
transportation of the battery casings chips from the Site to an
approved solid waste landfill in the nearby area. On-site
activities (e.g., treatment process and capping) represent minor
exposure risks. The time required to complete remediation is
estimated to be approximately 6 months. This is based on
stabilization and transportation of the battery casing chips to an
approved solid waste landfill; the excavation of the first foot of
soils underneath the battery casing chips pile that are above the
cleanup level, treatment to meet LDRs (if necessary),
transportation to an approved solid waste landfill, and capping the
remaining wastes on-site, that exceed the revised clean up level.
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 21
-------
Alternatives 4, 6, 7, 8, and 10 all pose a short-term and/or
temporary risk associated with the mixing process, mechanical
treatment process or transportation each alternative anticipates
for implementation.
6. Implementability {is the technical and administrative
feasibility of a remedy, including the availability of goods and
services needed to implement a particular option)
Alternative 6 is an innovative technology with mechanical
complexity, so implementability is uncertain. Alternative 6 may
also produce wastewaters that would have to be treated.
Alternative 4 is considered readily implementable.
Alternatives 7 and 8 ranked low under this criterion, because of
the difficulty in locating secondary smelters willing to accept the
contaminated batter casing chips, that were in full compliance with
all Federal and State environmental regulations.
Alternative 10 can be considered a somewhat innovative technology.
This process has been used at only one CERCLA site.
The proposed alternative 12 is considered to be readily
implementable; the technologies used under this alternative are
well-proven.
7. Cost {includes estimated capital and operation and maintenance
costs)
A comparison of the costs are included in the table below.
Alternative 4 provides a mid-range cost; however, it leaves treated
battery casing chips in a flood plain. Alternative 6 is very
expensive, even when the -30 to +50 percent accuracy is taken into
account. Alternative 7 is mid-range in cost. Alternative 8 is the
second lowest in cost of the Alternatives under consideration.
Alternative 10 is' expensive, reflective of significant on-site
processing. The costs of Alternative 12 is mid-range and provides
effective treatment and disposal of both battery casing chips and
soils.
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 22
-------
ALTERNATIVE: DESCRIPTION
COSTS
4: Ex-Situ
Stabilization/Solidification of
Battery Casing Chips and Soils
with On-Site Solid Waste Landfill
Disposal
$9,800,000
6: Battery Casing Chips Treatment
Using BOM Process with Off-Site
Solid Waste Landfill Disposal;
Soils Treatment Using BOM Process
With On-Site Debris Solid Waste
Landfill Disposal
$74,000,000
7: Battery Casing Chips Disposal
at Secondary Lead Smelter; In-
Situ Stabilization and Capping of
the Contaminated Soils
$16,300,000
8. Alternative 8: Battery Casing
Chips Disposal at Secondary Lead
Smelter; Capping of Contaminated
Soils
$13,100,000
10: Canonie Battery Casing Chips
Washing Process;.
Stabilization/Solidification of
Contaminated Soils; Disposal of
Battery Casing Chips and Soil at
Off-Site Solid Waste Landfill
$22,500,000
12: Ex-Situ Stabilization of
battery Casing Chips; Disposal of
Stabilized Battery Casing Chips
and Contaminated Soils at an
Approved Solid Waste Landfill
$16,700,000
8. Support Agency Acceptance {indicates whether, based on its
review of the AAS and Proposed ROD Amendment, the support agency
concurs, opposes, or has no comments on the proposed alternative)
The Ohio EPA fully accepts and supports Alternative 12, and is
expected to concur with this ROD Amendment.
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997
23
-------
9. Community Acceptance (summarizes the public's general response
to the alternatives described in this Proposed ROD Amendment and in
the AAS.}
The U.S. EPA provided a public comment period on the Proposed Plan
for a Record of Decision Amendment from January 27, 1997, to
February 25, 1997, and conducted a public meeting on the Proposed
Plan in the City of Troy, Ohio, on February 19, 1997. The
community generally supports the change. No significant concerns
were raised during either the public meeting or during the public
comment period. The U.S. EPA's response to the public comments
received are summarized in Attachment A to this ROD Amendment.
IX. SELECTED REMEDY
The U.S. EPA has selected Alternative 12 as the alternative to
address the remaining on-site lead-contaminated battery casing
chips and soil. The selected alternative involves the following:
*• Lead Acid Battery Casing Chips: Excavation of approximately
56,000 cubic yards of battery casing chips for treatment either on-
site or off-site at a permitted TSDF to meet the LDRs as a RCRA
D008 waste, followed by disposal at an approved solid waste
landfill off-site.
+ Contaminated Soils; Excavation of the first foot of contaminated
surface soils under the existing battery casing chips pile, which
exceed 1550 mg/kg lead in soil. Those contaminated soils that
exceed 1550 mg/kg lead and that pass the TCLP test, would be
disposed at an approved solid waste landfill off-site. Those soils
that exceed 1550 mg/kg lead and that fail the TCLP test, would
either be treated on-site or off-site at a permitted TSDF to meet
the LDRs, followed by disposal of the soils in an approved solid
waste landfill off-site. In addition, any on-site soils below the
first foot of soil underlying the former battery casing pile or
outside the boundaries of the battery casing chips pile that exceed
1550 mg/kg lead, will be excavated and tested. Soils passing the
TCLP can be either consolidated under a solid waste cover system
meeting the OAC requirements for design and construction of solid
waste landfill facilities, or disposed of at an approved solid
waste landfill off-site without treatment. Soils that exceed the
cleanup level and fail the TCLP will either be treated on-site or
off-site at a permitted TSDF, to meet LDRs, followed by disposal in
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 24
-------
an approved solid waste landfill off-site. The decision whether to
conduct off-site or on-site treatment will be made during the
remedial design/remedial action phase.
» Lead in Soil Clean Up Level: The PRPs/Defendants submitted a
revised risk assessment dated September 19, 1996. The U.S. EPA, in
consultation with the Ohio EPA, has reviewed and approved the
revised risk assessment and has established a level of 1550 mg/kg
lead in soil as a cleanup level (concentration of lead in soil not
to be exceeded) for on-site soils.
* Excavation Requirements: If the clay layer associated with the
semi-confined aquifer at the Site is penetrated during excavation
activities, water might rise into the excavation. This phenomenon
would be dependent on current Site conditions due to seasonal
weather conditions. Any lead-contaminated water rising into the
excavation would have to be treated to meet the substantive
requirements of the Clean Water Act, National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System {"NPDES") permit requirements set forth at OAC
3745-33-04, the NPDES pretreatment requirements set forth at OAC
3745-36-07, or local limits set by a publicly-owned treatment
works, if the water is discharged off-site. Therefore, excavation
activities will use engineering controls to minimize any adverse
impacts due to Site geological and hydro-geological conditions.
*• Pre-Excavation Confirmatory Sampling: Confirmatory sampling of
the contaminated areas on the Site will be conducted. This
sampling may change the area to be capped, but will not affect the
solid waste cover system design. Solid waste cover system design
is independent of the confirmatory sampling.
> X-Ray Fluorescence ("XRF") Field Sampling Instrumentation: The
XRF field sampling technology will be used to determine the soils
that are above the cleanup level and that will be excavated and
disposed of at an approved solid waste landfill. The calibration
of the XRF instrument will be verified. The XRF instrument
calibration standards will be analyzed as required by the
manufacturer. In addition, at a minimum, a quality check of 10
percent of all XRF field measurements with off-site definitive
laboratory analyses will be done, in accordance with approved
design documents. If XRF field sampling instrumentation is not
technically feasible or cost-effective, either off-site or mobile
on-site laboratory analysis will be conducted in accordance with
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 25
-------
the approved design documents to determine soils requiring
excavation and off-site disposal.
» Post-Excavation Confirmatory Soil Sampling: Post-excavation soil
sampling will be conducted to confirm that all soils with lead
contamination in excess of the cleanup level, above the regional
groundwater table, have been excavated and removed from the Site.
Sampling and analytical requirements for determining whether the
cleanup level has been met will be specified in the approved design
documents.
* Solid Waste Cover System Requirements; Soils that contain greater
than 1550 mg/kg lead, which remain on-site above the regional
groundwater table, will be consolidated under a solid waste cover
to ensure the future safety of the groundwater. If, however, all
of the battery casing chips are removed and properly disposed of,
and all of the contaminated soils containing lead in excess of the
cleanup level are removed to the regional groundwater table and
properly disposed of, then construction of a cover will not be
required.
If a solid waste cover system needs to be constructed, it shall be
a RCRA Subtitle D solid waste cover system compliant with all
applicable or relevant and appropriate Ohio EPA solid waste
regulations set forth at the OAC 3745-27-08, 3745-27-11 and 3745-
27-19 (H) and (J) . Based upon OAC 3745-27-08, a geosynthetic clay
liner ("GCL") may be substituted for a compacted clay liner, and a
geonet may be substituted for the 12 inch sand drainage layer. In
addition, a slope protection system shall be required. The solid
waste cover system design, from bottom to top, is as follows:
* A GCL: The subgrade will be prepared for the installation of the
GCL. The subgrade will be compacted. Protruding rocks and other
deleterious debris will be removed. The surface will be flattened
using a smooth drum compactor.
•• A 40 Mil HOPE Flexible Membrane Liner ("FML") ; The GCL and FML
together form a composite geomembrane/soil liner with a maximum
hydraulic conductivity of 1 x 10'7 cm/sec.
* A 12 Inch Sand Drainage Layer; Minimum hydraulic conductivity of
1 x 10"2 cm/sec. A geonet is an allowable option under OAC 3745-
27-08.
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 26
-------
» A 8 Oz. Filter Fabric: Minimum hydraulic conductivity of 1 x 1CT2
cm/sec.
»• A Cover Soil Layer: The cover soil will increase the total
thickness of soil above the composite liner to 30 inches which is
required thickness for frost protection in the Miami County, Ohio
region. Assuming the use of a GCL, the total thickness of the soil
cover above the composite liner would only need to be 24 inches.
+ A 6 Inch Topsoil Layer:
» A Slope Protection System: Slope protection will be built into
the topsoil layer and will protect the soil and side slopes from
flood damage and other erosion factors.
+ Native grass vegetation.
" Treatment/Disposal; Before waste materials are removed from the
Site, it must be determined whether or not those waste materials
are contaminated by hazardous waste, and therefore, must be managed
as a hazardous waste under Subtitle C of RCRA. This determination
can be made either through knowledge of the composition of the
waste, or by testing the waste material using the TCLP test. The
TCLP test will be used at the Site to determine whether or not the
battery casing chips and those soils that are contaminated with
lead in excess of 1550 mg/kg lead, are non-hazardous and should go
directly to an approved solid waste landfill without any treatment,
or are characteristic for lead and therefore, hazardous, and need
to be treated, either on-site or off-site at a permitted TSDF, to
meet LDRs. Soils.contaminated with lead less than 1550 mg/kg lead
in soil, that are left in place at the Site, would not be subject
to any hazardous waste management requirements, including any
testing.
The battery casing chips and soils that fail the TCLP test must be
stabilized to meet the LDRs for a non-lead acid battery RCRA D008
waste and pass the TCLP test, prior to disposal in an approved
solid waste landfill. In practical terms, this means that the
leachate produced from the stabilized material when subjected to
the TCLP test, must be less than the value set forth :*.n the LDRs
for that material. If so, the stabilized battery casing chips or
soils would "pass" the TCLP and meet the LDRs, and could be
transported off-site to an approved solid waste landfill for final
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 27
-------
disposal. The battery casing chips and soils will either be
treated on-site or off-site at a permitted TSDF to meet LDRs,
followed by disposal in an approved solid waste landfill. If the
battery casing chips are treated off-site, the battery casing chips
will be sent directly to a permitted TSDF for treatment to meet the
LDRs, followed by disposal in an approved solid waste landfill. If
the battery casing chips are treated on-site, each batch of the
treated battery casing chips will be tested by the TCLP. The
definition of a batch will be based upon the size that develops the
optimum performance for the on-site treatment plant used for
treatment of battery casing chips or soils. Each batch that passes
the TCLP test will be disposed of at an approved solid waste
landfill. If a batch of treated battery casing chips fails the
TCLP test, that batch will be treated until it meets the LDRs, and
passes the TCLP test.
The decision to treat soils contaminated with lead in excess of
1550 mg/kg, that fail the TCLP test, and battery casing chips, on-
site or off-site at a permitted TSDF will be made during the
remedial design and remedial action phase. Other residues will be
managed in accordance with approved design documents.
» Groundwater Monitoring; The technical groundwater monitoring
requirements for this Site are described at OAC 3745-27-10. The
groundwater monitoring action level for lead is 50 ppb. A phased
approach to groundwater monitoring is described in OAC 3745-27-10.
The direction of groundwater flow will be established, and a
minimum of four wells will be used to monitor groundwater quality
and flow in the vicinity of the unit, one up-gradient, three down-
gradient. Additional groundwater sampling wells may be added, if
necessary, based upon the interpretation of the groundwater flow
direction(s). After background analytical data are established for
the well system, the groundwater monitoring will be performed
quarterly, with appropriate physical and chemical parameters
measured and compared to background levels previously collected.
If the data from a water sample shows a significant statistical
increase or change in the parameter measured, the groundwater from
all of the wells will be resampled to verify that the changes in
the data are accurate and precise. If the re-sampling event
verifies a change in a measured parameter, an assessment of the
release will be conducted, followed by corrective action, if
necessary. The fact that the aquifer is a source of drinking water
may require additional provisions which would maintain the
DSL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 28
-------
useability of the aquifer. Other physical and chemical parameters
of monitoring may be considered, along with lead, on a site-
specific basis. After the first year of testing, if no detections
are made for other metals, the U.S. EPA, in consultation with the
Ohio EPA, would re-evaluate both the frequency and the parameters
for sampling. If lead is the only parameter that is monitored, and
it is detected at an elevated level, then other parameters would be
analyzed. The exact details of the lo^g-term monitoring program
will be worked out during the remedial design, including details of
compliance monitoring, if necessary.
The following original ROD remedial actions were addressed by the
Phase I - RA conducted in 1992: Off-Site Soils; New Well
Installation; and General Clean Up.
The following original ROD remedial actions remain the same:
> Monitoring of Surface Waters and Air: Monitoring of the surface
waters and air will be performed during the remedial action. After
removal and treatment of the highly contaminated soils from the
Site, surface water sampling and appropriate analyses of physical
and chemical parameters will be performed quarterly for one year.
After the first year of testing, if no detections are found, the
U.S. EPA, in consultation with the Ohio EPA, will reevaluate both
the frequency and the parameters for sampling. The exact details
of the monitoring program will be worked out during the remedial
design, including details of compliance monitoring, if necessary.
»• Excavation and Non-Excavation Area Backfill. Grading. Topsoil.
Erosion Control, and Revegetation: In addition to erosion control
and revegetation of all backfilled areas, all areas disturbed
during the remedial action will be filled and graded with clean
fill. The Site will be graded in such a way as to promote positive
Site drainage and to prevent ponding of waters on the Site, once
remedial actions are complete. At least six inches of suitable top
soil will be placed on the entire Site for revegetation. Drainage
ditches, drainage swales, and erosion control methods will be
implemented to prevent surface runoff from eroding the final grade
and from flowing toward the adjacent properties. These controls
will satisfy the requirements of OAC 3745-27-19(J).
Additional requirements with this proposed ROD amendment:
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 29
-------
* Institutional Controls: Deed restrictions or other institutional
controls will be required (to the extent of the U.S. EPA's
authority) to: (1) protect the solid waste cover system; (2) ensure
that the Site is and remains zoned light industrial or commercial;
(3) ensure that there are restrictions prohibiting excavation in
those areas of the Site that continue to have lead in soil at depth
(below the regional groundwater table) in excess of the cleanup
level of 1550 mg/kg lead in soil; and (4) ensure that the small
area of contaminated material that was left in place around the
former USL Office building (currently the Pro Car Care building) ,
and the forced sewer system, is properly remediated in the event
that the road is widened, the sewer system replaced, or the
building demolished.
*• Fencing: The fence shall be repaired and maintained throughout
the remedial design/remedial action phase, to prevent access and
vandalism to the Site. Once the remedial action has been
completed, access to the capped area (if any) will be controlled in
order to protect the integrity of the solid waste cover system,
consistent with future land use at the Site.
X. ARARa COMPLIANCE
The substantive requirements set forth in the rules and regulations
identified below are ARARs to the remedial action at the Site.
Water Act (Ohio Authorized
The remedy does not include groundwater treatment or otherwise
require a discharge of contaminants to surface water. However, if
as a result of excavation activities lead- contaminated water is
generated, it will be treated and discharged in accordance with the
substantive requirements of the Ohio NPDES permit program
requirements (OAC 3745-33-04) , the NPDES pretreatment requirements
(OAC 3745-36-07) or any local limits set by a POTW. The only
surface water body with the potential to be impacted by migration
of lead contamination from the Site is McKaig Ditch. McKaig Ditch
surface water will be monitored during the remedial action for up
to two years following removal of the most contaminated soils
Sampling and analysis will be in accordance with OAC 3745-1-03. If
it is determined that the water quality has been impacted by Site
contaminants being discharged to the Ditch, actions will be taken
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 30
-------
to ensure that applicable State water quality standards are
achieved and maintained.
Clean Air Act (Ohio Authorized Proqxffun)
Fugitive air emissions resulting from response activities shall be
controlled pursuant to OAC 3745-17-08(6).
Resource Conservation flnd Recovery Act
A. Management of excavated battery casing chips and soils that are
characteristic DOQ8)waste. All excavated battery casing chips and
soils that fail the TCLP test must be managed in compliance with
RCRA hazardous waste ("HW") standards regulating generation, on-
site treatment and shipment off-site for disposal.
Standards for generators of Hazardous Waste (State Authorized
Program):
OAC 3745-52-11 HW Determination
OAC 3745-52-20,22,23 Manifest Requirements
OAC 3745-52-30-33 HW Packaging, Labeling, Marking,
Placarding
OAC 3745-52-34 Accumulation Time of HW
General Facility Standards at OAC 3745-54:
OAC 3745-54-13 General Analysis of HW
OAC 3745-54-14 Security for HW Facilities
OAC 3745-54-15 Inspection Requirements
OAC 3745-54-31 Design and Operation of HW Facilities.
OAC 3745-54-32 Required Equipment for HW Facilities
OAC 3745-54-33 Testing and Maintenance of Equipment
OAC 3745-54-34 Access to Communications or Alarm System
OAC 3745-54-37 Agreements with Local Authorities
OAC 3745-54-62-64 Contingency Plan Requirements
OAC 3745-54-55 Emergency Coordinator
OAC 3745-54-56 Emergency Procedures
Land Disposal Restrictions
OAC 3745-59-35 Prohibits disposal of lead-contaminated
battery casing chips and soils exhibiting
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 31
-------
the characteristic of toxicity (based on
TCLP test showing concentration in extract
of the waste exceeding 5 mg/L). The
prohibition does not apply if the wastes
are treated to meet the treatment standard
specified for D008 waste in OAC 3745-59-
41.
B. Consolidation within the area of contamination (boundaries of
former battery casing chip pile) and capping of soils left on-sitg
that exceed the 1550 ppm cleanup standard for lead.
Soils (except for the first foot of soil underlying the former
battery casing chips pile) that have been excavated and determined
to meet the LDR treatment standard for lead (thus are not a
characteristic hazardous waste) can either be disposed of off-site
or consolidated within the boundaries of the former battery casing
chips pile under a Subtitle D solid waste cover system. The cap
will comply with Ohio solid waste regulation requirements that are
ARARs. The remedial action does not require excavation of soils
below the first foot of soil under the former battery casing chips
pile if the lead content is below the 1550 ppm clean up standard;
nor does it require excavation of any soils outside the boundary of
the former battery casing chips pile that are below 1550 ppm.
Although it is possible some of these soils may be RCRA
characteristic, RCRA Subtitle C capping requirements will not be
triggered because the soils will not be excavated. The U.S. EPA
has determined that neither RCRA Subtitle C nor Subtitle D capping
requirements are appropriate with respect to these soils because
the lead contamination does not exceed risk-based levels and
because most of the highly contaminated soils and battery casing
chips are being removed from the Site. There are also lead
contaminated soils located below the regional groundwater table.
The contamination resulted historically from the migration of lead
in acidic leachate from the disposal area. This migration has
stopped because .acid is no longer present in the soils. The Ohio
EPA has determined that under its solid waste rules, these
contaminated soils should not be considered "solid waste" and are
thus not subject to solid waste capping requirements. (See Letter
dated June 10, 1997 from Ms. Frances M. Kovac, Attorney, Ohio EPA.)
The U.S. EPA concurs with the state's determination.
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 32
-------
Ohio's siting requirements for solid waste landfills are set forth
at OAC 3745-27-07(H) and 3745-27-20. OAC 3745-27-20 prohibits the
placing of solid waste in any unfilled areas of an existing
landfill or a new unit unless the unfilled areas or new unit are at
a minimum provided with an interim composite liner/leachate
collection system in accordance with paragraph B of OAC 3745-27-08.
After June 1, 1994, the rule also prohibits placing solid waste in
any new unit located in a flood plain unless it can be shown that
the facility will not restrict the flow of the one hundred year
flood, reduce the temporary water storage capacity of the
floodplain or result in washout of solid waste so as to pose a
hazard to human health and the environment. These restrictions are
not applicable to the remedial action at the USL Site because the
waste was placed at the Site prior to 1994, and no new waste will
be added. Waste is being consolidated within the original area of
contamination. The area to be covered will not be expanded beyond
the boundaries of the existing area of contamination. The siting
regulation may be relevant because there will be solid waste left
on-site in a floodplain. They are not considered to be appropriate
because the selected remedial action removes the battery casing
chips and the majority of the soils exceeding risk-based levels
(95% of the more contaminated waste material) from the Site.
Nevertheless, the U.S. EPA believes that the criteria for siting in
a flood plain in 3745-27-20(0(2} will be met because engineering
controls to prevent washout are part of the remedy.
The design, construction and operation of a solid waste cover
system will comply with the following applicable or relevant and
appropriate RCRA requirements:
OAC 3745-27-08 Construction Specifications for Sanitary
(C)(16) Landfills
OAC 3745-27-10 Requirements for Groundwater Monitoring and
Corrective Action
OAC 3745-27-11(G), Final Closure of Sanitary Landfill
& (H)
OAC 3745-27-13 Prohibition on Excavating on Land Where
Hazardous or Solid Waste was Operated, Unless
Activity Won't Create Nuisance
DSL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 33
-------
OAC 3745-27-14(A) Requirements for 30 Years Post-Closure Care
OAC 3745-27-19(H) Final Cover Requirement
OAC 3745-27-19(J) Ensure Surface Water is Diverted from Areas
Where Waste is Deposited; Control of Run-On and
Run-Off to Ensure Minimal Infiltration Through
Cap and Minimal Erosion of Cover Material and
Cap System
Other Federal and State Requirements
Response activities shall comply.with the following:
a. OSHA requirements pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1910 and 1926;
b. Department.of Transportation requirements pursuant to 49 CFR
Part 171;
c. Water well standards pursuant to OAC 3745-9-04(A)(B); OAC
3745-9-05 (A) (1) and (B) to (G) ; OAC 3745-9-06 (A), (B), (D)
and (E); OAC 3745-9-07; OAC 3745-9-08; OAC 3745-9-09 (A) to
(D)(l), (E) and (F) ; OAC 3745-9-10;
d. OAC 6111.04: Prohibition on causing to be placed any
industrial waste or other wastes in a location where they
cause pollution of any waters of the state; and
e. OAC 3745-15-07: Prohibition of air pollution nuisances.
XI. STATUTORY DETERMINATION
The selected remedy in this amendment is protective of human health
and the environment, complies with Federal and State ARARs and is
cost-effective. The selected remedial action utilizes permanent
solutions and considered the use of alternative treatment
technologies to the maximum extent practicable. This remedy
satisfies the statutory preference for treatment in CERCLA Section
121 in that the majority of the lead-contaminated waste will be
excavated, treated to meet land disposal restrictions and disposed
off-site.
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 34
-------
Alternative 12 protects human health and the environment, is cost-
effective and addresses the CERCLA statutory preference for
treatment. Since some soils containing lead in excess of health-
based levels will remain on-site, a review will be conducted to
ensure that the remedy continues to provide adequate protection of
human health and the environment within five years after
commencement of the remedial action.
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 35
-------
APPENDIX A - RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY
TO THE
RECORD OF DECISION AMENDMENT
UNITED SCRAP LEAD SUPERFUND SITE
CITY OF TROY, CONCORD TOWNSHIP, MIAMI COUNTY, OHIO
JUNE 1997
-------
ATTACHMEiNT A TO THE RECORD OF DECISION AMENDMENT SUMMARY
RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY
RECORD OF DECISION AMENDMENT
UNITED SCRAP LEAD SUPERFUND SITE
CITY OF TROY, CONCORD TOWNSHIP, MIAMI COUNTY, OHIO
PURPOSE
The responsiveness summary has been prepared to meet the requirements of Sections
113(k)(2)(B)(iv) and 117(b) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act of 1980 ("CERCLA"), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act of 1986 ("SARA"), which requires the United States Environmental
Protection Agency ("U.S. EPA") to respond to the comments submitted, either written or oral
presentations, on the proposed plan for remedial action. All comments received by the U.S. EPA
during the public comment period were considered in the selection of the final remedial
alternative for the United Scrap Lead Superfund Site (the "Site") located in the City of Troy,
Concord Township, Miami County, Ohio.
This document summarizes written and oral comments received during the public comment
period of January 27, 1997, to February 25, 1997. The comments have been paraphrased to
efficiently summarize them in this document. The public meeting was held at 7:00 p.m. on
February 19,1997, in the cafeteria of the Troy High School in Troy, Ohio. A full transcript of
the public meeting, as well as all written comments received during the public comment period
and all Site related documents, are available for review at the Information Repositories, at the
following locations: 1) Troy-Miami County Public Library, 419 West Main Street, Troy, Ohio;
and 2) U.S. EPA Region 5 Superfund Division, Records Center, 7th Floor, 77 West Jackson
Blvd., Chicago, Illinois, 60604-3590.
OVERVIEW
The remedy selected in the September 16, 1988, ROD was a final remedy addressing risks
associated with on-site and off-site lead-contaminated soils and on-site lead acid battery casing
chips ("battery casing chips"). Certain components of this selected remedy were implemented in
1992. However, the main source control component, involving an innovative technology for
treatment of the on-site soils and battery casing chips, was not implemented after Predesign, Pilot
Plant and Economic studies indicated serious implementability issues and substantially higher
costs.
The selected remedy in this ROD amendment addresses the remaining on-site lead-contaminated
battery casing chips and soil. The scope of the selected remedy involves the following: (1)
excavation of battery casing chips for treatment and disposal at a U.S. EPA-approved Resource
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 A-l
-------
Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA") Subtitle D landfill ("an approved solid waste
landfill"); (2) excavation of the first foot of soils under the battery casing chips pile that exceed
1550 milligrams per kilogram ("mg/kg") lead and that fail the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching
Procedure ("TCLP") standard, will be treated to meet RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions
("LDRs") and disposed off-site in an approved solid waste landfill; and (3) construction of a
solid waste cover system over the remaining contaminated soils to ensure the future safety of the
groundwater. If, however, all of the battery casing chips are removed and properly disposed of,
and all of the contaminated soils containing lead in excess of 1550 mg/kg lead are removed to the
regional groundwater table and properly disposed of, then construction of a solid waste cover
system would not be required. The proposed alternative remedy will remove the source of direct
contact with lead contamination, and recent analyses have demonstrated the absence of any
groundwater contamination
I. Comments on the January 1997 Proposed Plan
1. Comment: Alternative 12.
Response: We appreciate your support of the recommended and selected remedial action
at the Site, which will remove all of the sources of lead contamination in the soils, and
battery casing chips, and is restricted to an approximately 8 acre area on the Site property.
Deed restrictions will be placed on the property to prevent homes from being built on the
property. The local residences are not impacted by any lead-contamination, and
therefore, there is no justification for extending the remediation beyond the Site
boundaries. The U.S. EPA is very concerned about the potential for lead poisoning, and
the reason for this remedial action at the Site is specifically to remove the sources of lead,
ensuring the protection of human health and the environment.
2. Comment: What are the latest figures for levels of cadmium and lead in the groundwater
(after 1979)? After 1992 cleanup?
Response: Neither cadmium nor lead were detected in groundwater in the December
1995 and May 1996 sampling rounds conducted by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
("USAGE"). The USAGE is the U. S. EPA's contractor for the Site. No sampling was
conducted prior to the 1992 cleanup to make a determination of groundwater
concentrations.
3. Comment: What health problems resulted since 1979 to nearby residents and former
employees of USL directly from the lead and/or cadmium? Who are the names please.
Have their conditions improved since the 1992 cleanup? How much, if any, will their
medical conditions improve after renewed cleanup?
Response: The 1988 Remedial Investigation ("RI") Report (Section 1, P 5-6/14) stated
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 A-2
-------
that in the period from 1972 to 1977, ten USL workers were diagnosed by physicians as
having lead poisoning. This prompted an investigation by the Occupational Safety and
Health Administration ("OSHA"), which noted high levels of lead contamination in air
samples taken close to the Site and lead-contaminated dust near the railroad depot in
Troy, Ohio. In 1982, "dangerously high" lead concentrations were noted in blood
samples taken from employees. Blood levels from these workers were not provided
within the RI.
Section 6.2, p. 2/2 of the RI, discusses air sampling taken near the Site and blood samples
taken from willing residents living around the Troy railroad yard and the Site. Appendix
J of the RI lists names and blood lead concentrations of these persons. Sample reports
were dated November 19,1985 and February 10,1986. Of the 18 adult and 16 children
residing in the immediate area of the Site who agreed to participate, Section 6.2 states
there were no indications that these (OSHA) levels (30 micrograms/deciliter blood or "30
ug/dL") were exceeded by adult residents in the immediate area of the Site who agreed to
participate. [However, Appendix J notes that blood lead concentrations of 2 adults
exceeded 30 ug/dL in the November sampling. One of these adults was retested in
February 1986, and blood lead concentrations were within acceptable limits.]
The RI notes that in 1988, blood lead concentrations of 30 ug/dL to 50 ug/dL suggested
that further evaluation be performed. A blood lead concentration equal to greater than 50
ug/dL was considered by OSHA to be indicative of lead poisoning. The USAGE did not
find reports of any further testing of blood lead concentrations. Current OSHA
regulations, Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations ("C.F.R. ") 1926.62, require
additional medical examinations and consultations for employees whose with blood lead
levels at or above 40 ug/dL.
The RI stated that children with erythrocyte protoporphyrin ("EP") concentrations greater
than 35 ug/dL were referred to a physician. One child four and '/z had an EP value of 37.
A six and 12 year old had EP values of 35 ug/dL. All remaining children had EP values
less than 35. Current U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD")
Guidance (June 1995) defines a lead-poisoned child as a child with a single blood lead
level that is greater than or equal to 20 ug/dL or consecutive blood lead levels greater
than or equal to 15 ug/dL. The Integrated Exposure Biokinetic Uptake ("IEUBK") Model
for Lead in Children has a default value of 10 ug/dL blood lead as a level of concern for a
child.
4. Comment: Have you documented the health problems of the former USL employees with
high lead blood levels and followed their health since their 1983 testing?
Response: Neither the U.S. EPA or its contractor, the USAGE, could find any evidence of
follow-up medical studies that documented health problems attributable to the Site.
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 A-3
-------
5. Comment: Can you provide the 1983 employee blood test results? With names, if
possible.
Response: Employee blood test results are not available within the RI Report or other
USL documentation. It is possible that some employees were included on the list found
in Appendix J, but this information was not provided.
6. Comment: Any local documented cases of leanrig disabilities caused by the lead from
the Site? Names would be helpful.
Response: Sixteen children were among the participants in the blood lead testing, but all
but three had EP values less than 35 ug/dL. Children with EP values greater than 35 were
referred to a physician. Neither the U.S. EPA nor the USAGE could find any evidence of
additional blood sampling or evaluation of lead impact on the children. Neither the U.S.
EPA nor the US ACE could find any documentation of learning disabilities caused by lead
from the Site.
7. Comment: Absent any documented health problems caused by the contaminates, why
take any action? Only after caused health problems are documented, can a cost/benefit
analysis be done.
Response: Even though the area is now fenced, it is very difficult to prevent Site access.
especially among children. At one time children were using the battery casing pile for
sledding. Children are the most susceptible to adverse health effects from exposure to
lead, and the effects ave been found to be cumulative.
From Appendix A, Title 29 C.F.R. 1926.62: There are immediate toxic effects of lead.
but also serious toxic effects that may not become apparent until years of exposure have
passed. A significant portion of the lead that a person inhales or ingests get into the
blood stream, then is circulated throughout the body and stored in various organs and
body tissue. Some of this lead is quickly filtered out the body and excreted, but some
remains in the blood and other tissues. As exposure to lead continues, the amount stored
in your body will increase if you are absorbing more lead than your body is excreting.
Even though you may not be aware of any immediate symptoms of disease, this lead
stored in your tissues can be slowly causing irreversible damage, first to individual cells,
then to organs and whole body systems. Please refer also to Volume 58 Federal Register
("FR") Number 84, Tuesday, May 4,1993: Appendix A, Page 26635 and Appendix C, II,
Page 26642 for more details.
Groundwater results indicated that there is no current impact. However, to prevent future
impact to the shallow aquifer, it is prudent to remove the source of lead and other metals.
Removal of the source material will ensure that there is no impact to the groundwater
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 A-4
-------
quality, and that a more costly remediation will not be required in the future. The U.S.
EPA requires consideration of both human health and the environment.
8. Comment: Overall, the proposed plan seems to adequately balance overall remediation
while protecting the environment, at a reasonable cost. Other proposed plans are more
expensive, but do not provide a balanced plan to protect the environment and humans.
Response: The U.S. EPA, in selecting the remedy, is required to evaluate all alternatives
against nine criteria, which are used to evaluate cleanup alternatives and provide the basis
for selection of the final cleanup action at Superfund sites. Two of the nine criteria are
Long-term Effectiveness and Permanence, which refers to the ability of a remedy to
maintain reliable protection of human health and the environment over time, and Cost.
which includes estimated capital and operation and maintenance costs. The U.S. EPA
believes that the selected remedy will provide the best balance between all nine criteria,
which are presented below:
1. Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment {addresses whether
a remedy provides adequate protection of human health and the environment and
describes how risks posed through each exposure pathway are eliminated, reduced
or controlled through treatment, engineering controls or institutional controls}
2. Compliance with ARARs {addresses how the preferred alternatives comply with
pertinent Federal and State environmental laws and/or justifies a waiver. The
ARARs with which each alternative must comply are detailed in the Remedial
Investigation and Pre-Design Reports.}
3. Long-term Effectiveness and Permanence {refers to the ability of a remedy to
maintain reliable protection of human health and the environment over time}
4. Reduction of Toxicity, Mobility, or Volume Through Treatment {evaluates an
alternative's use of treatment to reduce the harmful nature of contaminants to the
environment, and the amount of contamination present}
5. Short-term Effectiveness {addresses the ability of alternatives to manage risks
during construction and implementation phases, and reduce immediate risks posed
by the hazardous materials present}
6. Implementability {is the technical and administrative feasibility of a remedy,
including the availability of goods and services needed to implement a particular
option}
7. Cost {includes estimated capital and operation and maintenance costs}
DSL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 A-5
-------
8. Support Agency Acceptance {indicates whether, based on its review of the
Proposed Plan for a ROD Amendment, the support agency concurs, opposes, or
has no comments on the preferred alternative}
9. Community Acceptance {summarizes the public's general response to the
alternatives described in this Proposed ROD Amendment.}
9. Comment: Troy currently receives all of its drinking water supply from the lower buried
valley aquifer. Our aquifer has been designated a sole source aquifer, and the plan
proposed for the Site will protect the aquifer from future risks of contamination from this
Site.
Response: The U.S. EPA is very concerned about the potential for lead poisoning, and the
reason for this remedial action at the Site is specifically to remove the sources of lead,
ensuring the protection of human health and the environment. Groundwater results
indicated that there is no current impact. However, to prevent future impact to the
shallow aquifer, it is prudent to remove the source of lead and other metals. Removal of
the source material will ensure that there is no impact to the groundwater quality, and that
a more costly remediation will not be required in the future. The U.S. EPA requires
consideration of both human health and the environment.
10. Comment: Troy is currently planning to initiate investigations to locate a third well field.
The well field will more than likely be located further east and south the current two well
fields. Troy has received endorsement from Ohio EPA on the first 2 of 3 parts of its
wellhead protection program.
Response: Groundwater results indicated that there is no current impact. However, to
prevent future impact to the shallow aquifer, it is prudent to remove the source of lead
and other metals. Removal of the source material will ensure that there is no impact to
the groundwater quality, and that a more costly remediation will not be required in the
future. The selected remedial action at the Site will ensure that the remaining sources of
lead are removed, ensuring the protection of human health and the environment.
11. Comment: Currently, the Time of Travel protection area for our current well fields does
not overlap the Site; depending upon the location of a third well field, the ultimate
protection zones may impart an overlap near the Site. For this reason, Troy urges U.S.
EPA and all interested parties to move forward on a timely basis with the proposed plan
clean up.
Response: Groundwater results indicated that there is no current impact. However, to
prevent future impact to the shallow aquifer, it is prudent to remove the source of lead
and other metals. Removal of the source material will ensure that there is no impact to
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 A-6
-------
the groundwater quality, and that a more costly remediation will not be required in the
future. The selected remedial action at the Site wall ensure that the remaining sources of
lead are removed, ensuring the protection of human health and the environment.
12. Comment: I've been with this like I said since '85. I watched them put the fence up
around that 5 acres back there. Those people were from Canada. Who in the world
chooses where this money is paid out to whom? This is American soil, and we should
keep our money local. And I watched the 17 foot hole dug back there and big dump
trunks dump that dirt in that hole behind that building just because it's what they call
public access. And there's a lot of money wasted. Why can't there be a better control on
this and get the job done? That is just my comment. I've seen it. I had a wind mill in my
yard. Those people did not come, those engineers did come over and set that thing up
when the wind blew it over. So I don't know how they got an accurate record. I'd call
them. I'd tell them. I'd go over and talk to the engineers. I seen the figures on the first
site. There was a lot of money wasted and this country ain't in no shape to waste that
kind of money. I mean, it was big figures. So who is in control of all this? I mean it just
doesn't, seems like just a waste for such a good cause. Do you understand what I'm
saying? There was money wasted. Those engineers built that fence around that property
in back and done the surveys because I told them they had to do that survey for my
property. They are not people local. All these people, all these engineers have been
brought in from other states or like I said those people were brought in from Canada.
Why is that? I mean to me it looks like it would be better controlled, better money put
right here to our people that is affected by this.
Response: The fence was constructed by the PRPs at the request of the U.S. EPA under a
Consent Decree. The U.S. EPA does have the right to disallow the use of a particular
contractor, if the Agency is not comfortable with the qualifications of that contractor for
the task. However, the U.S. EPA cannot dictate what contractor the PRPs may hire.
13. Comment: You happen to have since 1988 produced one of the nicest collections of
Chinese honeysuckle there is in this part of the country. That is a new problem that has
created since the old problem. Probably should take a look at that environmentally.
Chinese honeysuckle is an exotic plant which is a real problem in this area. It's growing
rapidly every year. Farmers are more concerned about it than anyone else. But this Site
happens to have on it a very nice collection of rapidly growing Chinese honeysuckle.
Little red berries.
Response: The selected remedial action at the Site will remove all of the sources of lead
contamination in the soils, and battery casing chips, and is restricted to an approximately
8 acre area on the Site property. Deed restrictions will be placed on the property to
prevent homes from being built on the property. The local residences are not impacted by
any lead-contamination, and therefore, there is no justification for extending the
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 A-7
-------
remediation beyond the Site boundaries. The U.S. EPA is very concerned about the
potential for lead poisoning, and the reason for this remedial action at the" Site is
specifically to remove the sources of lead, ensuring the protection of human health and
the environment. The selected remedial action does not include addressing the Chinese
Honeysuckle plant.
USL ROD AMENDMENT
June 1997 A-8
-------
APPENDIX B - ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
TO THE
RECORD OF DECISION AMENDMENT
UNITED SCRAP LEAD SUPERFUND SITE
CITY OF TROY, CONCORD TOWNSHIP, MIAMI COUNTY, OHIO
JUNE 1997
-------
U.S. EPA ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
REMEDIAL ACTION
UNITED SCRAP LEAD SITE
TROY, OHIO
UPDATE *i TQ THE COMBINED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
O2/06/97
DOC! DATE
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
PA6ES
1 01/00/97 Department of the U.S. EPA
Arty, Corps of
Engineers
2 01/27/97 U.S. Arty, Corps of
Engineers
3 01/27/97 U.S. Arty, Corps of
Engineers
Report : Supplement To The Alternatives
Analysis Study
Hap : Conceptual Remedial Action Plan
Hap : Soil Lead Concentrations.
69
-------
U.S. EPA ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
REMEDIAL ACTION
/
UNITED SCRAP LEAD
TROY, OHIO
COMBINED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
JANUARY 29, 1997
VOLUME GUIDE
VOLUME DOCUMENTS
• 1 1-24
2 25-113
3 114-121
4 122
5 123-128
6 129-148
7 149-168
8 169-185
9 186-198
10 199-206
11 207-231
12 234-251
13 252-254
14 255
15 256-257
16 258-259
17 260-302
-------
U.S. EPA ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
REMEDIAL ACTION
UNITED SCRAP LEAD SITE
TROY, OHIO
COMBINED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
01/29/97
/\K
MCI DATE
CSS« SSS3
1 00/00/00
2 00/00/00
3 00/00/00
4 00/00/00
5 '00/00/00
6 06/26/67
AUTHOR
sssns
RECIPIENT
SO3SSSSSS
Adukus, V., U.S. Porter, J., U.S. EPA
EPA - ,
Hoelscher, R., U.S. KleiMn, J., U.S.
EPA EPA
Canonic Environ- U.S. EPA
natal
7 00/01/67
loyd, H.t fliati
County Boird of
Zoning Appeals
Boyd, «., Mini
County Board of
Zoning Appeals
8 04/00/83 IEPA
9 05/26/83 Ofttko, T., Ohio EPA U.S. EM
10 06/09/83. fettf, T., Ohio EN
M*T. fetter, U.S.
EPfc
11 11/03/83 latin, C. an* E. Unittd Scrap Ltad
Ballon Cotpany
12 12/00/84 Heston-Sper TAT D.S. EPA
13 03/15/85 Cut Dresser I Hdet Bartelt, R., U.S.
EM
14 OS/00/85 Caia Dmsor i IWet U.S. EPA
TITLE/DESCRIPTION PASES
sasassssssmssss sssas
Action Hetorinjuo re: Inediate Reooval 10
RequHt for Unittd Scrap Lead Site
Heooranduo re: Regulatory Status of Batteries IB
n/Attachmts
Renedial Btsiqn Eicoitive Sutnary for the 41
Said, Inc. (OR) Site
TreatabilitT Study Scoot of Services for 13
Unittd Scrap Lead
United Scrap Lead Rtttdi*! Invtstigation and 17
Feasibility Study Statettit of tork
Nettinf notes: Kinatts of Board's Decision to 4
Delay Judgtnent on Pernit Request by United
Scrap Lttd to Landfill Batttry Casings on
Their Property
Meeting fctes: Minutes of Board's Decision 1
that the Findings of the Zoning Inspector be
C*emle4 and the Ust of tht Land by United
Scrap Lead for Landfilling of lattery Cases
be Approved *ith Reservations
Reportt Study of Lead PolUtion in Sranite 52
City, Madison and Venice, Illinois
Site Inspection Report 8
Hazard Ranking Systet lark Sheets and 21
kcuttntation Records for Hazard Ranking
SystM
Harruty Deed Transferring Tract of Land to 3
United Scrap Lead Cotpany
Site Assnsttnt of United Scrap Lead, Inc. 33
Initial Site Evaluation ftttort for the United 29
Scrap Lead Site
Final Health and Safety Plan for the United 58
Scrap Lead Site
-------
DOCI DATE AUTHOR RECIPIENT TITLE/DESCRIPTION PAGES
**** **** ****** ********* ***************** *****
IS 06/27/85 Haitnorne, J., Cup Vanderlain, S., U.S. Final Coatunitr Relations Plw for the United 26
Dreiier I Nctee EPA . Scrip Lead Site
16 08/00/85 Heston-Sper TAT U.S. EPA Eurgency Action Plan for the United Scrap 39
Lead Site
17 08/23/85 Hoi Us, A., U.S. EPA Lonrenct, S., U.S. Conversation Record re: Interpretation of Off 1
EPA Site Policy iith Regards to Eoergency Action
Proposed at the United Scrap Lead Site
IB 10/26/85 Babcock, J., Dayton tmpaper Article: 'Troy king tamed About 1
Daily NMS Lead Contaminated Sites*
19 10/27/85 Albaugh, D., Dayton Hetspaptr Article: 'Annoyance Becoecs 1
Daily Km Dangerous*
20 10/29/85 Ohio EPA Agenda for Public Hotting on Sample Results 3
and Action leiag Taken at the laltioort i
Ohio Railyard, Troy OH, a/Attached Background
Sheet
21 11/00/85 U.S. EPA/OPA Fact Sheet re: United Scrap Lead Site 2
22 11/14/85 Nelson, R., U.S. EPA Hvtrs, J., Jenks I Letter re: Additional Request for Information 2
Hyers Company (Me to Attorneys for United Scrap Lead
23 11/14/85 Nelson, R., U.S. EPA United Scrap Lead Letter re: Stood Rcqoest for Information 2
Companyt et ah
24 11/14/85 Haithorne, i.t Cup Vanderlaan, 6. and tort Plan (volute 1) for the United Scrap 108
Dresser t HcKee A. NojUs; U.S. EPA Lead Site
25 11/29/85 NcCut, H., U.S. EPA File Memorandum re: Trip Report for the United 2
Scrap Lead Site
26 12/03/85 Myers, 4., leaks i Oaks, J., U.S. EPA Letter re: Answrs to Information Request by IB
Hyers United Scrap Lead Through Their Attorneys
27 12/04/85 KcLcod, H., U.S. EPA Adamkus, V., U.S. Action Hteoranduo: Immediate Removal Request 3
EPA for the United Scrap Lead Site
28 12/12/85 Porter, D., Troy Newspaper Article: 'Arcanum Lead Contu I
Daily Nm ination Similar to Troy's*
29 12/20/85 Constaotelos, B., Service List Letter Transmitting the RI/FS Horkplan and B
U.S. EPA Offer to Conduct the RI/FS in Accordance tith
the Horkplan
-------
BOCI DATE
mill itrs
AUTHOR
•CKCSS
RECIPIENT
snctuo
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
PASES
*****
30 12/20/85
Constintelos, B.,
U.S. EPA
Strvice List
31 01/00/86 U.S. EPA/OPA
32 01/22/86 town, N., Troy
Daily Men
33 01/26/86
34 01/29/86
35 01/29/86
36 01/30/86
BOMMI, M., Hiaei
Valley Sunday
Magazine
U.S. EPA
U.S. EPA
BOMU, N., Troy
tally KM*
Letter re: Notice of Status as a Potentially
Responsible Party and Offer to Recipients to
Conduct the Hork Required to Abate Any
Releases or Threatened Releases
Siperfund Proeraa Fact Sheet for the United
Scrap Lead Site
Newspaper Articles: (1) 'High Lead Levels
Uncovered in Sone Blood Tests* and (2)
•Superfund Meeting Heit Hetk'
Menpaper Article: 'Troy 'Being Something
About' Hazardous Haste Sites'
Aeenda for the January 29, 1984 Public
Heeling. >
37 02/00/86 Nelson, R., U.S. EPA
Pthlic Anoonceeent of the January 29, 1986
Piblic HNting
HeMpaper Articles: (1) 'Long Ten Cleanup of
USL Tears Awy- and (2) 'Officials to
Betemine Ihat to do «ith Railyard*
RcGran, ».; Bungan, Letter to Londoner J.H. Holowb Through His
HcGran i toppers Attorneys Requesting Hi* to Hetorialize the
Cooseat He Granted U.S. EPA to Conduct
Certain Studies on His Property
39 02/07/86 NcCue, N., U.S. EPA File
39 02/17/86
40 02/27/86
41 03/12/86
Bailen, E. and C.
Bailen
Frayne, A.; Jacob A.
Myers Company
U.S. EPA
Heooraadua re: Trip Report for United Scrap
Lead January 29, 1996 RI/FS tick Off Heating
Consent for Entry and Access to U.S. EPA and
Caep Bresser i RcKee
•elson, R., U.S. EFA Letter re: Rationali for Mot Providing the
U.S. EPA uitb United Scrap Lead Records
42 03/18/86
Contending Officer,
U.S. Coast
Guard/Atlantic
Strike Tea
Frayne, A., Jacob A.
Myers Coipany
U.S. EPA/Region 5 Incident Saeeary: Joint Soperfund lawdiate
Renoval at the United Scrap Letd Site
Kelson, R., U.S. EPA Letter ret Additional Response to Infcreation 14
Rtewst by United Scrap Lead
-------
OKI DATE
»« ****
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT
snrasss
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
PAGES
43 03/20/84
44 04/03/84
45 04/14/84
44 04/18/84
47 04/22/86
4ft 04/23/84
49 04/24/84
SO 04/25/84
51 04/28/B6
HcLeod, «., U.S. EPA Adaakus, V., U.S.
EPA
Melton, R., U.S. EPA Frayne, A., Jacob A.
Hyers Coopany
Burk, £., Jacobs
EngittHring and N. ,
llcLeod, U.S. EPA
Frayne, A., J«cob A. Nelson, R., U.S. EPA
Hyers Cooptny
Boraan, NM Troy
Daily tan
LindHaa, 0., Troy
Daily Nevs
toman, N., Troy
Daily Hens
i, N., Troy
Daily HNS
Burl, E. and S. Hu, I., U.S. EPA
Springer; Neston
Sper
Action Heeorar.due: Sii tenth Tin Emption
to Allw Continuation fo Itsediate fteeoval
Activities at the United Scrap Lead Site
Letter re: U.S. EPA's Claie to Authority to
Coipel Production of Additional Documts
Directly to the U.S. EPA Region 5 Offices
Study: 'Fugitive lead Air Ecission Fron an
Abandoned lattery Breaking Facility'
Letter re: Response to U.S. EPA's April 3,
1984 Letter Concerning U.S. EPA Authority
CMpellini Actual Physical Production of
Documts
NcHpaper Articles: (1) 'Lead Levels High at
Park* and (2) 'Lead Contaeinated Area Once
Used as Landfill*
Nempaptr Article: 'Lead Danger a lad Problem
Handled Hell'
Nenpaper Article: 'EPA Supports City's
Trostle Park Proposal*
Menpaper Article: "Clay Put on Park Brands'
Hawthorne, J., Cup Vandtrlaan, 6. and
Dresser t RcKee A. tojtes; U.S. EPA
52 OS/22/86
S3 07/00/86 PEl Associates, Inc. U.S. EPA
54 11/05/84 Nelson, T., U.S. EM Holcotb, J.
55 12/31/86 Hartun, D. aid S. Striibu, II., U.S.
Springer; Hestm EPA
Sper
56 03/23/87 Kojtas, A., U.S. EPA Troy Residents
Technical Assistance Tea Report on Sail and 10
Air Saepling
Draft Technical Hetorandui for Geophysical 63
Survey at the United Scrap Lead Site
Phase I Final Report: Electrooetbrane Process 1S3
for Recovery of Lead froe. Contaeinated Soils
Letter re: Fears of Landowner That His 2
Property Kay Still ke Contaminated
OSC Report Out lint for the United Scrap Lead 22
Site
Letters to Area Residents Updating Thee on 12
the Residential Hell Sampling Along win the
Results
-------
MCI IATE AUTHOR RECIPIENT TITLE/DESCRIPTION PASES
tti* is:: I*HCC •«**••**• ixm«*ut«*«»> *•**!
57 04/U/B7 Voihitm, J., Clip Vanderlaan, 6., U.S. Alternatives Array DocuMnt for the United 72
Drcsier I HcUc EPA Scrap Lead Site
58 07/00/87 U.S. EPA Suptrfund Prograt Fact Sheet for tht Unittd 4
Scrap Itad Site
5» 09/01/67 longest, H., U.S. U.S. EPA HMorauhti of Understanding nith tht Bantu IS
EPA of nines
60 09/11/87 Constantelos, I., Va/ious Intonation Litter Reqttsting Responses to 3
U.S. EPA faestions About Haste fUterialt aid iMorata
Coverage
61 09/17/87 Semer, S., Seowr fates, «., U.S. EM Litter re: Response te Scptnber iW 2
Itetal Cotpany Itforution
62 09/17/87 Ootarello, S., lintiit, «., U.S. EN Utter re: Ritpoau te SiptMtar 19B7 1
RichMod fate Part* iBfonatioa RM,mt
63 09/17/87 Rntwll, E. Jwtm, I., U.S. EPA Utter ret Response te Stptetbtr 1987 1
(latMM)i latcsoa Uforeatiw Request
Scrap fetal
64 09/17/87 Fricke, S., fackliy lustes, «., U.S. EPA Utter re: Response te Sipteober 1987 1
Bros., Uc. laforutioB Request
65 09/18/87 Sckudt, I., U.S. NojUs, A., U.S. EPA Utter Report on Testing of Casing Raterials 13
Ml/Wren of Rimi and Soils for Uad ConUtiMtion litk
AtteCAMBt Covering Haste Characterization
66 09/18/87 Billon, R.; Rajnori lustw, I., U.S. EM Utter re: Hinten's IK. Responsi te 1
L. Billon Septeoker 1987 Inforeation Request
67 09/18/87 Locr, RM CCC fates, I., U.S. EPA Utter re: Response te Septetber 1987 1
HighMj, IK. laforutioa Resoest
68 09/18/87 EOMT, R., Eater fates, I., U.S. EN Utter re: Response te Septttber 1987 1
Sons CotpatT bforaatlon Reeoest
69 09/18/87 Colotkis RecyclUi/ fates, I., U.S. EN Utter re: Response te Septettcr 1987 1
Iron Inforwtion Request
7C 09/1B/B7 Hess, R., Lancaster Justus, H., U.S. EN Letter rei Response to Septetber 1987
Itetal Coipanr Itfortation Request
71 09/21/87 Charla, L., Gniral Justus, N., U.S. EPA Utter re: Response te Septetber 1987
Motors Corporation Intonation Request
-------
MCI DATE AUTHOR RECIPIEIIT TITLE/DESCRIPTION PASES
• s» «»ts sisuz ****••**• **s»«is*s«i»»u azsi
72 09/21/87 Sherrj, 0. Justus, »., U.S. EPA Utter rt: Response to Stptnbcr 1987 . 1
InforMtion Request
73 09/21/67 AtlM Ret*I Inc. Justus, N., U.S. EPA Letter re Response to September 1987 1
Inforiitior Request
74 09/22/87 Senser, A.; J.n. Justus, N., U.S. EPA Letter re: Response to September 1987 3
Cousins Company InforMtion Request
75 09/23/87 Elberson, T., Dinner Justus,.I., U.S. EPA Letter re: Response to September 1987 1
Bell laforution Request
76 09/23/87 HidMst Iron I Itatal Justus, R., U.S. EPA Letter re: Response to September 1917 1
Coeptny Inforaatien Request
77 09/23/87 Hoover, N.; Korean Justts, N., U.S. EPA Letter re: Sdiiffer Metals teaeay Retpwse 1
F. Hoover to Septeeber 1957 Information Request
78 09/24/87 Nigrerson, H., Justus, R., U.S. EPA Letter rei Response to September 1987 2
lUyerfon Iron I Inforeition Request
Metal
79 09/24/87 Stevenson, 9., Justts, N., U.S. EPA Letter re: Response to September 1917 1
Biaemtf CrysttI S«It Uforutim Request
Coapanr
80 09/29/87 CrtMr, ft.; Michel, Justus, H., U.S. EPA Letter re: (Ulo Brothers I Sons Response to 2
Davis I Cruer . Septeeber 1987 InforMtion Request
81 09/23/87 Nott, N. . Justes, N., U.S. EPA Letter re: Response to Septetber 1987 1
laforMiioo Request
82 09/25/87 Fister, N.; Vincent Justts, N., U.S. EPA Letter re: Response to September 1987 1
Filter, Inc. liforwtioa Request
83 09/2S/87 Brotz, C., lUteritls totes, R., U.S. EPA Letter re: Response to Septeeter 1987 ' 1
Hmdliag Systen laforMtiw Request
84 09/26/87 Dobro*, £., kbrov Jntts, R., U.S. EPA Letter re: Response to Septnber 1987 3
Industries, IRC. Intention Request
85 09/28/87 Bible, D., lent* Justis, H., U.S. EPA letter re: Response to Septetber-1787 1
iron I Betil, Inc. Inforaition Request
86 09/28/87 Bonn in, J., Tror Justus, H., U.S.- EPA Letter re: Response to Septeeber 1907 1
Lim Equipeent Intonation Request
87 09/28/87 Chirli, L., Seneril JustH, H., U.S. EPA Letter re: Response to Septeeber 1987 '4
Motors Corporation Information Request
-------
DOCI DATE AUTHOR RECIPIENT TITLE/DESCRIPTION PAKS
atx« t»s czscsi ********* ***************** *****
88 09/2B/87 Cohen, I., Conen Justus, H., U.S. EPA Litttr rt: Response to Stpteiber 1987 1
Brothers, Inc. Inforaation Request
89 09/28/67 Plutly, 0.; Justus, «., U.S. EPA Utter rt: Volptr Iron t Metal's Response to 2
CritcMield, Septeaber 1987 Inforution Request
Critchfield I
Johnston
90 09/29/87 Johnson, C.; Lnis, Justus, «., U.S. EPA Utter rtt Creeer Iron and Nttil'i Response 1
Cicurcllo I / to Septeaber 1987 laforaition Revest
Friedbero.
91 09/29/87 Fields, R., Cntnl Justus, N., U.S. EPA Lttttr re: Response to SeptMbtr 1117 1
Transport Inforution Request
92 09/30/87 Oilier, L., Bob's tates, N., U.S. EPA Utter res tapoaM te Septeater 1917 3
Auto Parts Inforutien Requnt
93 10/01/87 talar, 6. and I. Justn, «., U.S. EPA Utter n: RHioaw to September W87 2
HoUr; Fairfield Infonition Request
Junk Coepany
94 10/02/87 Cornelius, T.; Terry tettot, N., U.S. EPA Utter ret IM! littery I Uad Coaoany's 1
L. Cornelius Response to SeptMbtr 1987 InfomtiM
Reowst
95 10/05/87 Bodas, 6. J«tus, •., U.S. EPA Utter m Response to September 1987 1
Iiforeation
94 10/05/87 Edeletn, 9., Justus, M., U.S. EPA Utter ret Response to September 1187 1
Franklin Iron I Intonation Requnt
Hetal Corporation ' .
97 10/05/87 Itarkus, S.; Ulter, Jostu, «., U.S. EPA Utter res St. (Ury's Iron I Steel's Response 2
Berne, Uronee, to September 1987 Infonutian Reqettt
t Curtis .
98 10/04/87 Fry, C.; Fry I Jastn, I., U.S. EPA Utter res Aluiinui Alloys Coepaty's Response 3
(taller Coepany to September 1987 Ufomtua Request
99 10/06/87 IkHeill, «.; Jmtus, •., U.S. EPA Utter res telly's Battery Service's Response 2
HcCullocn, Filfer, to September 1987 lofornation Request
Fite i Gutum
Coapany
100 10/04/87 Pavlik, H.; I.H. JusUs, «., U.S. EPA Utter rei Response to September 1987 1
Schleziiqer I Sons, Inforution Request
Inc.
-------
DOC* DATE AUTHOR RECIPIENT TITLE/HESCRIPTIW PASES
>zs< us: ****** ********* *****************
1C! 10/07/87 Kiftncr, L., Uttntr totes, «., U.S. EPA Letter re: Response to September 19B7 I
Scrap Iron k Ketal Information Request
102 10/08/87 Katz, L., Pennsyl Justus, »., U.S. EPA Letter re: Response to September 1987 1
vania Iron i CM! Information Request
Company
103 10/09/87 Cutchall, A., Triton Justus, »., U.S. EPA Letter re: Response to September 1987 1
Group Ltd. Infortition Request
/
104 10/09/87 Blink, H., CSI Jutes, «., U.S. EPA Letter re: Response to September 1987 2
Transportation Intonation Request
105 10/09/87 Villiamson, I., Justat, I., U.S. EPA Letter re: Response to September 1917 1
Bode-finn Company Infortition Request
106 10/10/87 Mtrtoin, 0., lill's Justts, «., U.S. EPA Letter re: Response to SepteeJwr 1987 3
Battery CoepMj Inforutim Request
107 10/12/87 Stuway, 0., Galion totes, »., U.S. EPA Letter re: Response to Septeibtr 1987 1
Dresser Information Request
108 10/12/87 Norly, 0., Horly totes, «., U.S. EPA Letter ret Response to Scptubcr 1987 1
Steel Md Supply Inforution Request
Ceepanr
109 10/13/87 Fry dun, A. totes, H., U.S. EPA Letter re: Response to September 1987 1
Information Request
110 10/14/87 Cohen, 0., Cohen totes, «., U.S. EPA Letter ret Response to Septeober 1987 2
Scrap Katerials . Inforution Request
111 10/14/87 Pollack, 0.; totos, K., U.S. EPA Letter ret Ross Auto Parts' Response to 2
Gottlieb, Johnston, September 1987 Inforution Request
Beu i Joseph
112 10/15/87 Raizk, A., totts, I., U.S. EPA Letter ret Response to September 1987 2
Niltingtan Iron t Ufornation Request
Hetal Coepany
113 10/15/87 Charla, L., General Justus, I., U.S. EPA Letter ret Response to September 1987 9
Rotors Corporation - Inforution Request
114 10/16/87 Burns, R., Burns Justus, «., U.S. EPA Letter re: Response to September 1987 4
Iron i Hetal Cotpany Inforution Request
US 10/19/87 Harmon, J.; Porter, totes, N., U.S. EPA Letter rat Nsskomitz Ires.' Response to 3
Bright, Morris t ~ September 19S7 Inforution Request
Arthur
-------
OOCI DATE
:xz« issa
AUTHOR
sestsa
RECIPIEIT
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
PAGES
SSSBS
116 10/20/87
117 10/22/87
118 10/22/87
119 12/08/87
120 01/19/88
8ronn, H., Dayton
Pour t Light
Coipiny
Constantelos, B.,
U.S. EPA
Constantelos, B.,
U.S. EPA
Scheldt, H., U.S.
DOI/Bureau of (lines
Schiidt, «., U.S.
DOI/Bureau of (linn
Justus, N., U.S. EPA Letter re: Response to Septeeber 1987
Infqreation Request
Various Letter, re: Notice of Potential Liability
Service List Letter re: Notice of Potential Liability and
Request for Inforeation a/Enclosures
Hojtas, A., U.S. EPA Letter re: Smeary of Prelieinary Results
froe Testing of a Nuiber of Treatment
Approaches for the United Scrap Lead Saaples
Hojtas, A., U.S. EPA Letter re: Report on the Results of the
Bureau of (lines Prelieinary Assesseent of the
Treatability of the Soil
121 02/00/88
w
122 02/00/88
123 03/23/88
124 03/31/88 U.S. EPA/Region 10
Caip Dresser i HcCee
Caep Dresser I KcKee
USDHHS/USPHS/ATSDR
U.S. EPA
U.S. EPA
U.S. EPA
U.S. EPA
125 08/00/88
126 08/00/88
127 08/15/88
128 08/20/88
129 08/24/88
130 08/25/88
Cup Dresser i Ifcfee
U.S. EPA
U.S. EPA
Friedean, L.{
Thotpsen, Hioe and
Flory
DIFES, Inc.
Friedeaa, L.;
Thoepson, Dine and
Flory
Dofficy, J., U.S.
EN
Heies, 6., U.S.
EPA/OPA
lufficy, J., U.S.
EPA
Remedial Investigation Report: Volute 1 of 2
(Test, Figures and Tables)
Remedial Investigation Report: VoleM 2 of 2
(AppendicesI
Health Assesseeot for the United Scrap Lead
Site
Record of Decision for the Gould, Inc. (OR)
Site
Final Feasibility Study Report
Proposed Plan for Reeedial Design
Transcript of Public fleeting Held August IS,
1988 at the Troy High School
Letter re: United Scrap PRP Group's Request
for « Extension of the Public Coeecnt Period
on the Draft Feasibility Study Report
Letter re: Process for Reeoval of Lead and
Other Heavy Hetals froa Solid Haste
Letter re: Proposed Treatment of the United
Scrap Lead Site and Request for U.S. EPA
Heetiag kith the United Scrap Lead PUP Croup
21
IB
158
377
12
56
279
11
72
-------
DOC* DATE AUTHOR RECIPIENT TITLE/DESCRIPTION PASES
ZSM ssss >»I3*
ill 08/25/flB 6tde, »., U.S. EPA Utter re: Spiciil Notice of Potential 28
Liability
132 08/29/88 Dates I Hoore U.S. EPA Letter re: OHI't Evaluation of the 21
Feasibility Study Report ind Retedial
Investigation Report for the United Scrap
Lead Site
133 08/29/88 Overturf, J.j Nojtas, A., U.S. EPA Letter re: Dohm Industries' Concents an the 5
Harrison I Hoberly / Feasibility Study Report for the United Scrap
Lead Site
134 OB/29/88 United Scrap Lead U.S. EPA Report; OSLB's Contents on U.S. EPA's 46
Group Feasibility Study for the United Scrip Lead
Site
135 09/00/88 U.S. EPA Record of tension 82
136 05/25/89 Scheldt, M., U.S. Hojtas, A., U.S. EPA Letter Feraarting Attached U.S. Ml Phase I 54
OOI/tureau of Nines Report for the United Scrap Lead Site
137 04/22/89 HcLeod, N., U.S. EPA U.S. EPA On SON Coordinator's Report 30
138 07/21/89 Cyphert, H.; Nelson, T., U.S. EM Letter Foruarding Attached Inforutioo 9
Thotpson, Nine and Subedited by the United Scrap Lead POP Group .
Flory Concerning Treatment of Lead Battery Casings
139 01/00/90 Converse, 1. and E. . Publication: 'Kisconsin (tend Soil Absorption 42
Tyler Systet: Siting, Design and Constrvction
Ranal*
140 02/00/90 Scheldt, «., U.S. U.S. EPA Asussnent of Current Tnatncnt Technique at 28
Ml/Bureau of Nines Soperfmd lattery Sites
141 02/00/90 Canonic Environ U.S. EPA Marketing Studies Report for the Could, Inc. 125
oental (OR) Site
142 02/00/90 Conestoga-Rovcrs i U.S. EPA Report: CRA's Contents on the Record of 141
Associates Neman (Incloding the Rl/FS)
143 03/09/90 United Scrap Lead Idukut, V., U.S. Letter re: United Scrap Lead Steering 11
PRP Group EPA Coneittee's Coteents on the ROB
144 05/16/90 Boseean, A., U.S. Fabinski, L., U.S. Heoorateu re: Lead Cleanup Levels 2
EPA EPA
145 07/00/90 Canonic Environ- U.S. EPA Stabilization Design Study for the Gould, IB
cental lee. (OR) Site
10
-------
DOM
SCI*
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
DATE
IKS
10/31/90
11/21/90
12/00/90
12/00/90
12/03/90
12/06/90
01/03/91
01/17/91
02/00/91
03/25/91
03/27/91
AUTHOR
Z3ZC2Z
Boseaan, A., U.S.
EPA
Bosecan, A., U.S.
EPA
Sverdrup Environ*
cental
Sverdrup Environ-
cental
Hull, T., Ohio EPA
VetQ LCCUV&fl | r • |
U.S. EPA
Hull, T., Ohio EPA
Royor, II., U.S.
EPA/QRD/RftEL
U.S. EPA
U.S. EPA/OERR/ObK
IOSCMO, A., U.S.
EPA
RECIPIENT
«.»»»
Van Leeuien, P.,
U.S. PA
Hull, T., Ohio EPA
U.S. EPA
U.?. EPA
Boseaan, A., U.S.
EPA
Boseoan, A., U.S.
EPA
Bosecan, A., U.S.
EPA
HolosU, A., U.S.
EPA
Public
. U.S. EPA
File
TITLE/DESCRIPTIOH
"""«"•«*"*"
Htaorandua re: Lead Cleanup Levels it
Superfund Sites
Letter re: Recedial Design Clarification,
Final Decision
Duality Control/Saopling Plan
Safety, Health and Emergency Response Plan
Letter rat Rnedial Design Clarification
Hnorandoi re: Lead Cleanup Levels
FAI Transmission Forwarding Hap Outlining
Flooded Areas
KeeoraodM re: Discussion I tecs Concerning
Reqrnt to Evaluate Viability of Chetical
Stabilization at the United Scrap Lead Site
Fact Sheet: Cleaacp Action to Begin
Reeoraadue ret Human Health Evaluation
Remual, Scpplecentil Suidance: 'Standard .
Befaalt Exposure Factors* (OSNER Directive
•9285.6-03)
Succory of March 27, 1991 Site Visit to
United Scrap Lead re: Inspection of (1) USL
PASES
•ran
1
2
102
73
1
9
2
8
4
28
1
157 04/00/91 U.S. EPA/OSKR/Ott U.S. EPA
158 05/00/91
159 06/06/91
Nolan, C., U.S. EPA U.S. EPA
Site for Installation of Fence and (21
Residential Property After Depletion of
Saoplui
Stperfttid Engineering Issue: Treatment of
Lead Contaminated Soils (EPA/540/2-91/009)
Site Photographs
BoiMin, A., U.S.
EPA
Nolan, C., U.S. EPA Letter Briefing
160 07/00/91 U.S. EPA/OftD
U.S. EPA
10
1
2
Selection of Control Technologies for 158
Retediatio* of Lead Battery Recycling Sites
(EPA/540/2-91/014)
11
-------
DOCI DATE AUTHOR
RECIPIENT
TITLE/KSOUPTIW
PACES
141 OB/00/91 Donohut i Associ- U.S. EPA
ates, Inc.
CoMunitr telitims Plan for tht Uiited Scrap 3!
Lttt Silt
162 09/12/91 U.S. EPA
Respondents
143 09/20/91 Bosetan, A., U.S. Fitt
EPA
164 09/23/91 BosMtn, »., U.S. File
EPA
Adiiaiftratiu Ordir br CoeiMt i/Attichtd
Saiplt Cover Letter
CMverution Record re: Drinking, Hater at
Residence (PGFTUMS OF THIS DOCUKIT HAVE
IEOI 8EMCTED)
Cmverution Records for the Period 4we i
Septeoker 23, 1991 re: Oaeaoe ta lactyird of
Reiideoce (PORTIOK OF THIS MOIOT HME
BEEN
US 09/23/91 Holoska, *., U.S.
EPA
144 09/23/91
167 10/17/91
166 11/00/91
149 11/1S/91
170 11/1B/91
171 12/00/91
172 00/00/92
173 01/00/92
174 02/00/92
17} 02/18/92
Holoska, A., U.S.
EPA
Cichocki, A., Hitch
Associates
Sverdrep Etviron-
•ental
Buuell, i.,
Sverdrep Environ*
•ental
Holoska, A., U.S.
EPA
Conestoga-Rovers I
AsiociatM
Lead Industries
Atfociition, Inc.
Canonie Environ*
nnUl
ConestogaHtovers I
Atuciatn
Rorer, H., U.S.
EPA/TSB
Nontfotervi A.,
Cwout Environ-
cental
Hoophrtv, C.( U.S.
EPA/Region 10
U.S. EPA
U.S. EPA
IMMM, A., U.S.
EPA
llanty, I., U.S.
EPA/TS1
U.S. EPA
U.S. EPA
U.S. EPA
HalMka, A., U.S.
EPA
Pre lesion Field Investigation Report
61
Neeorudu ret Reuval of Lead Froa lattery
Catinet i/AttactaMt
Telephone Neearandiui res Lead Cleanup at the 1
fiould, Inc. (OR) Site
Technical NeooraAdu re: CMtngs Treatteat 10
Protest
425
Technical Heoorwdiu re: Soil Treatment 14
Process
Neeorandu re: Request for Technical 1
Assistance
PeriMter Site Fencing Hork Plan 70
Lead leer cling. 1992 Directory
TreatOMt of Battery Casings and Soils Report 108
(Draft)
Cheoical Fiiation Position Paper
132
Neaorandui re: Folio* Up to Jatoary 30, 1992 12
PRP/EPA/NU netting •/Attachtents
12
-------
OKI MTE AUTHOR RECIPIENT TITLE/DESCRIPTION mil
«:«< scss ««>sss sxsiHaxi i»asa««**s»«i**»« aaasa
176 02/26/92 Ne thing ton, A., et Paper: *Decontacination of Leid Hastes frn 7
al. Superfund Sites1 (Proceedings of HflC South
•92)
177 02/27/92 U.S. Any Corps of Attendees fleeting Suiiar? ri: lepleeentation of the MM 6
Engineers Soil ind Casing Tre*ttent Process
175 02/27/92 Bachholz, T., U.S. File fteeeranduo re: Sueury of February 27, 1992 6
Arijr Corps of Meeting Concerning lipletentition of the BOH
Enginetrs/Ooaha j Soil tnd Casing Treateent Process it the
District United Scrip Lead tnd Arum* Iron t Metal
Sites
179 03/00/92 Conestoga-Rovers I U.S. EPA Final Report: Perieeter Site Fencing 100
Associates
180 OS/12/92 Carloci, S. loseean, A., U.S. Letter Fomrding Attached Rough Cost . 11
EPA Estimates for Three Reeediation Alternatives
(Draft) [UBI6IO]
161 43/12/92 Miles, C., U.S. EPA Royer, R., U.S. EPA netorandui re: Itonicipal Maste Technology 2
Section's Couents on the 'Cheeical Fiution
Position Piper*
1B2 03/16/92 Royer, H., U.S. Holosta, A., U.S. NeeoraidM re: START Contents on the 2
EPA/TSB EPA 'Cheeical Fiution Position Paper1
183 04/00/92 Bong, Y., et al. Joarnil Article: 'The Conversion of Leid 24
Solptute to Lead Carbonate in Sodine
Cirhoaate Media* (Hrdrooetalhrgr)
184 OS/04/92 Royer, II., U.S. EPA fachholi, T., U.S. Letter Forwrding Attached Revie* Contents on 16
Am Corps of the Pilot Plan Report
Engineers
IBS 06/00/92 Sverdrop Environ- U.S. EPA Econoaic Analrsis Report 117
aental
186 06/00/92 Sverdrup Environ- U.S. EPA Pilot Plan Report 400
cental
187 06/23/92 Stuabar, 1., Forest U.S. EPA START Program Special Investigation, Final: 36
Mheeler Envire- Feasibility of Using Hard Rubber 'Coeposite'
sponse, Inc. lattery Casings as a Fuel Supplement
188 07/00/92 U.S. EPA Public Fact Sheet: Phase I Cleanup Action Begins 4
189 07/21/92 lange, N., NAECORP, Estes, S., U.S. EPA Letter Foraarding Attached Information re: 44
Inc. toe NAECTITE Treatamt Process as an
Alternative Solution for the United Scrip
Lead Site
13
-------
OKI DATE AUTHOR
MSB *XX» »**S*
RECIPIENT
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
ssmsm* **»»**
PASES
190 07/23/92 Center of Haiardous U.S. EPA
Kittritls Research
191 09/16/92 L'.S. EPA
192 09/24/92 ATSDR/U.S. Public
Health Service
193 11/00/92 Defense Gcoeril
Supply Center
Ohio EPA
U.S. EPA
U.S. EPA
Recluition of Kateruls Fro* lattery Cm
Piles Fret the Tonolli Corporation Superfund
Site, Final Report
Superfund SUte Contract Bctwen the Ohio EPA
and U.S. EPA fcr Funding the Rewdial Action
Lead Initiative Suooary Report
hazardous Technical Inforeation Service*
Bvllttin, Special Edition: EPA Issus Final
Rule on Hazardous Debris
46
1(
194 12/15/92 Ohio EPA
Boseean, A., U.S.
EM
19J OS/00/93
196 06/00/93
197 07/30/93
198 08/02/93
199 08/05/93
200 08/09/93
U.S. EPA/Region U.S. EPA
s/ro
Starr, R., et al.j U.S. EN
Naterloo Centre for
SroandMter Research
Spitler, I., Ohio Boseaan, A., U.S.
EPA EPA
ThoMs limiller I M Remediation
Associates Services Corp.
OHH Retediatie
Services
U.S. EN
Scheldt, S., U.S. totem, A., U.S.
Any Corps of .EN
Engiietrs/Ooaha
District
FAI TranuitUl rti the Kiaoi Conservaicy 4
District (Bayton, ON) Policy and Procedure
for Peraits in Retarding lasins
Guidelines for Raking Environtentally Sound 41
Decisions in the Saperfond Reoedial Process
Article: 'Fennel and Sate Systet Directs S
Plum to U Situ Treatment1 (Ground Hater
hrrtits) •/AtUctaents
Letter ret Snap Treatment Systei at the Pro 2
Car Care i Used Cars Site
Bracing: Saltation Plot Plan for the Pro Car 1
Care i Used Cars Site
Hork Plan for Rapid Response Reetdiatioa 630
Activities, Revision 3
Letter Forwarding Attached Total Lead 4
Analytical Results of Dtcootaaination Hater
201 OB/19/93 Sinpsoo, J., Okio Boseaan, A., U.S.
EPA EPA
202 08/20/93 Boseaan, A., U.S. Hull, T., Ohio EPA
EPA
Letter ret Disposal of Se*age Generated at
the Pro Car Care Facility
Letter rat Phase 1 Reoedial Action Sevage .
Leach Field Installation at the United Scrap
Lead Site
203 08/20/93 Boseean, A., U.S. (fell, TM Ohio EPA
•EPA
Letter ret Swage Leach Field Installation at
the United Scrap Lead Sits '
14
-------
DOCI DATE AUTHOR
saai «aa: aaacca
RECIPIENT
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
PASES
•MM
204 10/13/93 CiMock, 5., U.S. town, A., U.S.
Any Corps of EPA
Enginetrs/Oeaha
District
70S 11/12/93 Pasha Publications
Inc.
206 11/17/93 Fnstid, N., COWIS, tatun, A., U.S.
Inc.
207 12/17/93 U.S. Arty Corps of U.S. EPA
Engineers
208 03/01/94 BosMin, A., U.S. Spitler, 1., Ohio
EPA EM
209 05/27/9* Phelps, R., Ohio EPA U.S. EPA
210 06/10/94 loseiin, A., U.S.
EPA
•onhoft, S.t U.S.
Artf Corp* of
Enginters/Oaaha
District
211 08/31/94 Ringenhacli, L.j loseoan, A., U.S.
Tift, Stettinin i EN
Hollister
212 09/00/94 Radian Corporation U.S. EN
213 09/00/94 U.S. EPA Puelic
214 09/29/94 Hull, T., Ohio EPA toiun, A., U.S.
EN
21S 11/00/94 Conestoga-Rovers I U.S. EPA
Associates
216 11/22/94 United Scrap Lead U.S. EPA
Group
217 11/29/94 Robinette, P., Niui toseoan, A., U.S.
Conservancy District EPA
Letter rt: Drinking Hater Hell at the United
Scrap Leae Site
•Superfund eatk' (Vol. 7, No. 44)
Letter Forwarding Attached Intonation on 41
CMNIS and the TERRAKT Process
301 Design Analysis for Temporary **d 151
Pertaitent Flood Control (Revised)
Letter re: Swage Leach Field Installation at 2
the United Scrip Lead Site
Letter Fowding Attached OEPA Ptrnit to 4
Install for the horn* Syste* at the Pro Car
Cart I Used Cars Site
Letter re: Phase I Rewdial Activities at the 1
United Scrap Lead Site
Letter Requesting Attached Article I'PRPs 3
Rent* Bnld lattery Stabilization)'
Soptrfnd tMtly, July 29, 1994) be Included
in the Adainistrativt Record
Altenutim Analysis Study, Final 263
Proposed Record of Decision Atendoent 14
Letter ret OEPA's Review of the Revised 13
Alternatives Analysis Study and Proposed ROD
Atendoent ^/Attached Ohio Revised Code ARARs
for the Proposed ROD Asendttnt
CRA's Technical Contents on Proposed Record 21
of Decision Aoendeent
USLS's Cottents on the Septetoer 1994 25
Proposed Record of Decision Aoendnent
Letter Forwdiig Attached (1) April 14, 1992 6
(letting Stiatary i/USACE Conceraing the
Potential Effect of the Proposed Cleanup
Project on the Taylorsvillt Retarding Basin
and (2) HCTs Policy and Procedure for
Ptroits in Retarding lasins
-------
DOCI DATE
•»xx **Z2
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
Ff»3
218 01/30/95 Ringenbach, L.j Allen, C., U.S.
Taft, Stettiniui i EPA/OPA
Hoilister
219 02/15/95 Youngstroi, 6., Ohio Boseoan, A., U.S.
EPA EPA
220 03/07/95 Denit, J.j Bon Clay Niedergang, »., U.S.
Associates, Inc. EPA/RCRA
221 03/23/95 Honzingo, i., U.S. File
Ar§y Corps of
Engineers
222 04/04/95 Barber, B., U.S. EPA Cyphert, H.; United
Scrap Lead PRP
Steering Coeaittee
223 04/20/95 Boseaan, A., U.S. Robinette, P., Riaai
EPA Conservancy Bistrict
224 05/01/95 Royer, H., U.S. EPA Bosetan, A., U.S.
EPA
225 05/24/75 Royer, I., U.S. EPA Eftes, S., U.S. EPA
226 05/24/95 U.S. EPA
Pile
227 05/31/95 Start, R., U.S. Any Boseun, A., U.S.
Corps of Engineers/ EPA
taaha Bistrict
228 06/01/95
229 06/13/95
Royer, H., U«S.
EPA/TAS/TSB
Royer, H., U.S.
EPA/KMRL
Birth, E., U.S
EPA/CERI
Mdrnsees
Letter Fcrwrding Attached USLB'S
•Supplettntal Cotient to the Proposed ROD
Aeendornt for the United Scrap Lead Site'
Letter re: (1) Cleanup Levels and (2)
Completion of Statement of ttork Tasks
Letter re: Regulatory Requirements for
Plastic Chips Generated as Part of Lead Acid
Battery Recycling
Heeorandu re: (1) United Scrip Lead Levee
and (2) Battery Chip Rttoval, SUkiliution,
ad Cover Design
letter ret the Public Count Period for the
Proposed ROD Aeendeent
Cover Letter Forwarding Marion Bocuwnts
Concertino, the Proposed Cleanup Activities at
the United Scrip Lead Site
FAI TranseiHiw Foraardiag Attiched Proposed
Agenda for the Hay 1, 1995 Conference Call
Concerning Remedial Action Objectives
Neoorandu ret (1) Addresses for listribntioo
of Field Inmtigatioa Study and 12) traft
ley Bontions for ConUiment Teu
Hnoraadoi ret Funnel tad Site Evilutloa
Effort Status as of Hay 24, 1995 (WAFT)
•/AttachMoU
Heaoraadw Forwrding Attached (1) USACE
(larch 23, 1999 Hewrindua Concernitg
Recouendations for Revisions to the
Preferred Clearap Plan and 12) April 20, 199S
Trip Report to the United Scrap Lead Site
Neoormdua re: S/S Issues
Heooraadm re: Transaittal of United Scrap
Lead BoneMts for Potential Reviw and
Assistance
10
16
-------
DOCI DATE AUTHOR
!»«* XTSS BSXXS3
RECIPIENT
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
*craftft«x
PA6ES
«**»
230 04/14/95 Studer, «., EMTACT, Esttf, 5., U.S. EPA
Inc.
231 04/22/95 EKTACT, Inc.
U.S. EPA
232 06/27/95 Robinette, P., Hiui Bos>tan, A., O.S.
Conservancy District EPA
233 04/29/95 Royer, H., U.S. Barth, E., U.S. EPA
EPA/DRD/hm
234 07/00/95 U.S. EPA/ORD
235 «7/07/95 Birth, E., U.S.
EPA/ORD/NRMRL
U.S. EPA
Barth, E., U.S. EPA
236 07/13/95 Barry, D., U.S. Any File
Corps of Engineers/
OMha District
237 07/18/95 Brim, B., U.S. EPA Buyer, H., U.S. EPA
238 07/26/95 Voungstroo, 6., Ohio BOSCBM, A., U.S.
EPA EPA
239 08/04/95 Russell, R., Soil Boseun, A., U.S.
Technologies, Inc. EPA
240 08/22/95 OHM Reeediation 0.$. EPA
Services Core.
241 09/11/95 Burden, D., U.S. Royer, H., U.S.
EPA/ORD/MRMRL EPA/NRHRL
242 09/19/95 Ouyang, V. and B. Burden, B., U.S.
Hill; Computer Bata EPA/WW.
Systees, Inc.
letter re: U.S. EPA Contacts for Battery *
Breaking Operations and Lead Contaeinated
Sites ^/Attached Draft U.S. EPA Hnorandun
Concerning June 13, 1995 U.S. EPA/USLSC
Meeting
Proposed Reaedial Solution at the United 93
Scrap Lead Site
Utter re: BCD s Coewnts on the Proposed 2
Cleanup Plan for the United Strap Lead Site
Meoorendue re: HMRL's Rene* of the taw 22, 2
1995 ENTACT Proposal for the United Scrip
Lead Site
Guidance: Contaeinants and Renedial Options 248
at Selected Metal Conteunated Sites
(EPA/540/R-95/512)
Hnortnduej re: HtML's Reirien of the June 22, 2
1995 ENTACT Proposal for the United Scrap
Lead Site
Reeoraadoo re: USACE's Coeeents on EXTACT's 2
•Proposed Reaedul Solution at the United
Scrap Lead NPL Site*
neeoranduo n: Revin of the ENTACT Proposal 1
for United Scrap Lead
Letter re: OEPA's Caeonts on the My 12, 2
1995 •Proposed Rettdial Solution at the
United Scrap Lead NPL Site1 Docueat
Letter Forvirding Attached lifemation ret 4
the HIS Proms for Reecdiation of Soil.
Containing Heavy Metal Contaeinatian
Final Report for Phase I Reeadial Action 352
(Appendices C-J)
Meeorandtto re: Dement and Data Revin for B
Modeling Lead Migration at the United Scrap
Lead Site
re: References for Measuring Kd,
CEC, Bnsaterated Hydraulic Conductivity, and
Hater Release Curve
17
-------
MCI BATl AUTHOR
ra* •!*> ran**
RECIPIENT
TITLE/KSCBIPTIIM
PASES
243 10/03/9} Rortr, II., U.S.
EPA/NRfflL/MSmD
244 10/10/95 Barth, E., U.S.
EPA/MflRL/SHSB
245 10/12/95 Herring, 6., U.S.
Arey Corps of
Engineers/Ooaha
District
24* 10/21/95 Boscoan, »., U.S.
EPA -
iostun, «., U.S.
EPA
Boseoan, A., U.S.
EPA
Boseean, A., U.S.
EPA
Pisani, I., ENTACT,
IK.
Neooranduo re: Change of START Point of
CenUct for the United Scrap Lead Sitt
Meoorandui re: SHSB't CoMents on the
Stpterter 26, 1995 EITACT RA Proposal feetine.
FAI Trtnuiffion ro: USACE's Counts on the
Stpttfber 2i, 1995 EVTACT RA Proposal
24? 10/2»/9S U.S. EPA/Technical U.S. EPA
Rcvit* HorkgroBp for
Ltid
248 10/27/95 Burden, D., U.S.
EPA/MdlH
249 11/00/95 Sverdrap Enviroo-
mUl
250 11/09/95 EITACT, IRC.
291 11/29/95 Birth, E., U.S. .
EPA/MUM.
2S2 11/29/95 Birth, E., U.S.
EPA/SNSB
Bosuan, A., U.S.
EPA
U.S. Any Corp* of
Englneers/U.S. EPA
U.S. EPA
EPA
, A., U.S.
, A., U.S.
293 12/08/95 M teetdiation U.S. EPA
Strvicn Corp,
254 12/OB/95 YoMgstroo, I., Ohio Bosetan, A., U.S.
EPA EPA
255 12/08/95 OWI Rnriiatioo U.S. EPA
StrvicM
254 12/08/95 DM Reecdiation U.S. EPA
Strvicn
Utter res U.S. EPA's CoMtnto on tta 5
•Proposed ReMdial Solution' BocMnt
ReviM of a Netkodolour for EtUMifU^ Risk 94
Based Soil Reoediatioo Boals for Cotaercul
Ami of tat California Solch Site
NewraadHi m AdditioMl Date Hetds fro* the 6
United Scrap Lead Site
Report! Final Field Satplina. Plan for 45
firondMttr Sailing at the United Scrap Lead
Site
Preliainary Alternative Analysis Steer
-------
OQCI DATE
Mai zis:
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
PASES
»*»»
257 01/19/96
256 01/25/96
259 02/00/96
260 02/05/96
261 02/12/96
Boseman, A., U.S.
EPA
MOM, T., et al.;
U.S. Any Corps of
Engineers
Sverdrup Environmen-
tal, Inc.
Hussey, 6., U.S.
Army Corps of
Engineers/Omaha
District
Burden, D., U.S.
EPA/NPm
Pisani, 0., ENTACT, Letter re: U.S. EPA's Revised Commits on the
Inc. November 9, 1995 'Preliminary Alternative
Analysis Study'
262 .02/16/96 Barth, E., U.S. EPA
263 02/20/96
264 02/28/96
265 03/01/96
266 03/07/96
267 03/12/96
268 03/14/96
269 03/20/96
Stnder, II., ENTACT,
Inc.
Pisani, D., ENTACT,
Inc.
Boseman, A., U.S.
EPA
Barth, E., U.S.
EPA/NRHRL
Barth, E., U.S.
EPA/MHRL/SHSB
Youngstrom, 6., Ohio
EPA
Nilson, T., U.S.
Army Corps of
Engineers
Boseman, A., U.S.
EPA
U.S. Army Corps of
Eiujineers/U.S. EPA
Boseman, A., U.S.
EPA
Boseman, A., U.S.
EPA
Boseman, A., U.S.
EPA
Boseman, A., U.S.
EPA
Boseman, A., U.S.
EPA
Herring, 6., U.S.
Army Corps of
Engineers
Van Donsel, T., U.S.
EPA
Van Donsel, T., U.S.
EPA
Boseaan, A. and T.
Van Donsel! U.S. EPA
Home, T., U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers
Memorandum re: Position Paper for the United 17
Scrap Lead Vadose Zone Modelling
Brounduter Sampling Report 114
Letter Forwarding Attached USAGE January 26,
1996 Memorandum re: Position Paper for United
Scrap Lead Vadose Zone Modeling •/Attachments
Memorandum re: Computer Modeling Plan and 5
Expected Results for the United Scrap Lead
Site
FAI Transmission Forwarding Attached trailing: 2
Conceptual Approach for Alternative United
Scrap Lead Site Remedy
Letter ret ENTACT's Response to U.S. EPA's 25
January 19, 1996 Comments m the November 9,
1995 'Preliminary Alternative Analysis Study'
Letter Forwarding Attached References 3
Concerning the Alternative Analysis Study
Letter rot Tasks to be Performed at the 2
United Scrap Lead Site
FAI Transmission Fonurding Memoranda 11
Concerning NWBI's Comment* on Various Issues
Concerning the United Scrap Load Site
Hemoramdca rt: SRSTs Response to EITACT'* . 5
January if, 1996 Proposal and Comment*
FAI Transmission re: QEPA's General Comments 4
on the EITACT Proposal
Memorandum re: Request from U.S. EPA for 1
Additional Information Requirement* from
ENTACT
19
-------
NCI DATE
AUTHOft
RECIPIENT
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
PAGES
csns
270 03/22/94 How, T., U.S. Arey
Corps of Engineer!/
Ottha District
271 03/22/76 How, T., U.S. Aroy
Corps of Engineers/
Osahi District
272 03/26/96 How, T., U.S. Aray
Corps of Engineers
273 03/29/96 Vw Donsel, T., U.S.
EPA
274 OS/07/96 EITACT, Inc.
275 OS/17/96 Slaughter, T.,
ENTACT, lac.
276 OS/11/96 Floyd, 0., ETACT,
Inc.
277 05/10/96 Healy, T., EITACT,
Inc.
278 06/OS/96 Scbmk, I., U.S.
Any Corps of
Enginetrs/OMha
District
279 06/12/96 Sclent, I., U.S.
Arty Corps of
Engineers/auto
District
280 06/26/96 Slaughter, T.,
ENTACT, Inc.
281 07/1S/96 ENTACT, Inc.
Van Donsel, T., U.S. FA1 Transoissian Foraarding Attached Karen
EPA 12, 1996 Cost Estieates for Reoedial Action
Alternatives for the United Scrap Lead Site
Van Donsel, T., U.S. Fax Transmission re: USAGE Consents on the
EPA ENTACT Proposal
Van Donsel, T., U.S. FAI Transmission re: USACE Coaaenti on U.S.
EPA EPA's Draft Letter to POPs Concerning the
ENTACT Proposal
13
Cyphert, H.;
Thoapsn, Nine I
Flory
U.S. EPA
Letter re: Retedy for Casings aad
Conteainated Soil Move the Mater Tahle
Altenttive Analysis Stedy at the United
Scrap Lead Site
Vaa Donsel, T., U.S. FAI Transmission re: Residual Lead
EPA Concentrations Associated uth the lattery
eating tehris at the United Scrap Lead Site
Van Donsel, T., U.S. Letter Fomrdiag Attached Statistical
EPA Analysts far Date Generated from Boring
Samples at the United Scrap Lead Site
D'irady, J., U.S.
EPA
Letter Fonurdiag Attached Mnotes fron the
Nay 14, 1996 United Scrap Lead Site Meeting
Von Donsel, T., U.S. Letter Foraardiag Attached Cast Estimates for
EPA Tao Rental Altenatim Proposed far the
United Scrap Lead Site
O'Srady, i., U.S.
EPA
O'Srady, J., U.S.
EPA
8'6rady, J., U.S.
EPA
Letter re: Land Disposal Restriction
Regtlatery Reeurtttnts for the Battery
Casing Debris at the United Scrap Lead Site
FAI Transaission Forwarding Attached Chart:
"Sites at thich Stahiliiation and or
Solidification of Dattery Casing Detris MM
the Chosen Reeedy in Lieu of Therul Recovery
in a Secondary Lead Stelter*
85
Letter Feraarding Attachedd Cost Estieates 11
for Foir Rteedial Action Alternatives
Proposed for the United Scrap Lead Site
11
20
-------
OOCI DATE AUTHOR RECIPIENT
ssss sasr ssssss sszszsssi
292 07/17/96 Youngstroi, 6., Ohio O'Sridy, J., U.S.
EPA EPA
283 07/22/96 O'Brriy, J., U.S. Kleiaan, J., U.S.
EPA EPA
284 08/01/96 Head, H., U.S. Aray O'Grady, J., U.S.
Corps of Engineers/ EPA
Oaana District
285 OB/01/96 Slaughter, T., O^rady, J., U.S.
ENTACT, Inc. EPA
286 08/01/96 O'Srady, JM U.S. Kleiean, J., U.S.
EPA EPA
2B7 08/02/96 Slaughter, 1., O'Brady, J., U.S.
EMTACT, Inc. EPA
288 OB/OB/96 Brew, I., U.S. Barker, B., U.S.
EPA/nn EPA/ORC
289 09/00/96 U.S. Arty Corps of O.S. EPA
Engitteers/Oeana
liitrict
TITLE/KSCRIPTIW
Letter re: Haste Characterization of Battery
Casing Chips
Reaorandue re: Classification of Chips fro*
Lead Acid lattery Casings */Attacheentf
FAI Transmission re: USACE Revien of Land
Disposal Restrictions at the United Scrap
Lead Site
Letter Foraarding Attached Motes froa the
July II, 1996 United Scrap Lead Site Meeting
Heeanedua re: Cap Issues at the United Scrap
Lead Site
Litter re: Suaaary of Issues f roa the July
31, 1996 Teleconference Concerning the
tevclopaent of a Lead Action Level or Cleanup
Standard for the United Scrap Led Site
re: ROW Regulatory ttteraiaation
for Plastic Chips froa Lead Acid Battery
Recycling
Final Sround Hater Saapliag Technical
PAGES
sens
14
11
121
290 09/16/96 HcPheeters, C.,
Seveason Environ
aeatal Services,
Inc.
O'Brady, J., U.S.
EN
291 09/16/96 O'Crady, J., U.S. File
EPA
292 09/17/96 Kleiarn, I., U.S. O'Sredy, J., U.S.
EPA EH
293 09/19/96 EMTACT, lac.
294 09/23/96 EMTACT, Inc.
U.S. EPA
O'Srady, i., U.S.
IN
Letter Femarding Attached (1) Semsn's 41
Coaaeats on the Proposed R8B Aacndaant; (2)
Introdtctory Letter to the HAECTITE Cheaical
Treataeat Process; and (3) Papert "Lead ana"
Other Heavy (fetal Fiiation in Sails aad Solid
Vast* by the RAECTITE Process
Notes ret Applicability of the TOP Test at 3
the luted Scrap Lead Site (DRAFT FIMAL-
SUUECT TO REVISION)
re: Cap Design at the United Scrap. 1
Lead Site
Risk Assessaent far the United Scrap Leaf 13
Site
FAI Transaission Foraarditg Attached Cost 3
lafanatiao re: (II Eicavatioa and
Stabiliutioo; (2) Do Site Consolidation aad
Caayiag; (3|RcCaig Ditch Inmtigatianj and
(4) Sther Iteas
21
-------
MCI BATE
AUTHOR
RECIPIDT
TITLE/KSCMPTION
MRS
275 09/24/94 U.S. Art? Corps of
Enginttrs
296 10/03/96 O'Srady, J., U.S.
EPA
297 11/12/96 O'Srady, i.t U.S.
EPA
298 11/13/96 O'Brady, J., U.S.
EPA
299 12/13/96 O'Grriy, J., U.S.
EPA
300 01/00/97 U.S. EPA/OPft
301 01/00/97 U.S. EPA
302 01/00/97 U.S. Arty Corp of
EB«,iMtrs/Ooiki
district
U.S. EPA
Fill
Oft Site Dispottl CstiMti for Off Site
TrutMflt Md liSfOMl for tte United Scrip
LudSite
Notn frot tbt StptHktr 19, 1996 Unittd
Scrip LHd Site httit| Conctrniag tte Drift
PropoMd Plan for tte fecerd of Decision
At for FiMl Intdiil Action
, 6., U.S.
Any Corps of
Eflfuitrt
Filo
Mile
Pufclic
U.S. EPA
Fit Trnscintea Forwnliai Etartte fm tte
•ovMbtr im Pra kfip FwU ImsUfiUn
Rtport
Notes froo tte Octeter 30, 1994 Itaited Scrip
LHd Site Rottiflf taareiH tte CentMt
tecrat Md SteteMt of tort (FIML)
Fict Stettt •PrapHid Plu SMHTT far tte
Doited Scrip iMd Site*
Fact Stetti frupiiU PlM for Ktcord of
tecitioa Aomdiiit for FiMl «Hodiil Action
•t (kited Scrip LMd Soptrfund Site*
SoppliMit to tte Utemtivo Analysis Stedy
for tte Uiited Scrip Liad Suptrftnd Site
10
Tomstrw, 6., Ohio FII Trmoission Forwrditg Eiorpts fret tte 19
EM^td 6. Horriao,, Fobrwry 1W teoidial temtigitioa ' '
—•— CoRconiM StdiiMt SMpliM
20
22
24
22
-------
GUIDANCE ADDENDA TO THE COMBINED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
UNITED SCRAP LEAD SITE
TROY, OHIO
I. Compendium of CERCLA Response Selection Guidance Documents
II. Guidance Addendum to the Combined Administrative Record
III. U.S. EPA/Region 5 OSWBR Directive Compendium
-------
[tO. I
M» «•) HIM
It IMM MMMMIIMINM,
It OHMMIMMW 4MMM«IMMk «N»
••MM MNMMIW M MM*
»WN
I MB *«••
IIMUAMMM «*NMI M WftIM M|J«M UNI M/IKM • MMIH. Ill
I IMIt a MMHIll MINIM >9MM M IMIMWIMMMMIM MMM/M • MBU. Mt . II • tU
I MWMO M*«MM MMMIMt IW IIMMI M IMMHM MMM) •IMMMI • «MO0. • • «BM||
MlKMI • HBBMIMr. I I MM
• A^M^MftB^M>lM fMMAMM ^MkM^AMBtfft MM BMMflMA tfOiOA MA/IK/AV
I OflttMV CM flAMIMMMMMtt
•M»Wt» • MMIM. Ml K
M/««IM • Illim. • . I
• MM M I
IMM tl I
IHMl . I I
tM I
• •«•• •«•«% I •!
IHMl II I
• I
IMtl • I
• M*li *•!•• <
•*«•• ••• •• <
MM MflMMMMIOMM*
IMI*
!••«•*• IOTMIVM
UMI «
iMNtl
I«M*M OM
•wn/w • toaw. MI
« I IIMIIIMIII
IMM II I IIMMI •ll4M\l«m
-------
*• MMMM
IN. Ml
IM4ll.il •
-------
Ml M HIM
• M* (§>!<•• ttttm.
IMI » INI* I
IM» • INN) |
IM» IIMMX
limn i
IINMIt
M IMWOSMMI •MOWIM HHMB WM/M - MBMOt CO . II 4 MIMB
•MOOT. MM*
Ml . II « MA 01
•. I
INI
I tall
• !•• iut. | •• MM
I M-ttM
II Jkm M-HN Mil* MM MM«Mt • MMJUIOJ
•••*• MM*
I MM M || IMil MM VMIIt n «<•«•••••
^ HI
IIW IIMMMMN «•!!• HH MRMIM
MMIM4 ' MIWMO. IM.M «
*
III
«M«vil***MMMIMramMMUaM|MM*M«| OMMMI
H
• I
• *.. II • /NOMS. ME I MM l» I
II«MI
•Ml I tart M i || «M> UJMM«I IN IMI-OMM. •(•«•*
M>»* •• ...%
!!••«§»•.» •*.•«.<
1
a«Ml M» Mi IMMIMM; WIWM • IMIMM MMM MMl OW ••«!! M |
•••MM. •Wt««««AMM«MI
aim
IM4 •I
MMUMNIMM Ml MMIIM MM9MMM O«UIM» MIIMItMIMI
MMMB Mtmt ,
• «I«IMI. • /«•« M»U»
ttfMI
MMl •» (
-------
IV
N» «M Mil*
• i . it« stuwa* M »MM in i
or turn*, i • AMV o
l» I
• •. • MM, • I M 0
M
• .!
If* ••! • ••••••
MM •• MM
Ml
MM HUNT*
HIVWMI. II
*«|«|-H I
•• um
IM>
IMI IIUIMM.
im it
MM II
UNI
WtaWMM MClUlf
M(.M»i«iiuwNNaa«iMniaiHiMi IIWI/H
CC.fi « MS OlMt I Mil 4»»
I M JIMM
1 1 . it « *• IIMI M»
R1II.MM
At .(« M MM
I MM •*«>• in i
••!•« flMl U I
M.HI
llMl II I II BMNB M •***••• H»bl>Hlfc •<>
CVMOM* HM MUMMIMM
HOB* MIMIC CHID Ml »«M
-------
IM
M M4 HIM
IMM
IMMH'lf* l*«««-i
IM MIMM0MHII
It I
MM It*
•
IMS
u»
I MHIIIM
IM9IU HtlWII
Kf
IMVHIt
(••it
If* *.«.•.( •« »l
Dl
i I
•MMOtUN
I MM
I IIMMmtMIIMMRVIMM.il
fMWOMI«M*M
-------
M) Ml HIM **** «IM»I §M *M» lm AIUOMMM HM*>li'« tufen
(M »«MM« .
IIINI MC
• VWMH HI MM
|M MIMinilWI*UM«lMIMMmMMICMHMUIMMn«MUI MAIM* • OtlMN H . • | M M Ml IHMl IM I ir*.w..| M ...i
__
MMMMMMMMBM MMIWMIM WWrti • OQM4H IMM M* I |i-«.n» ••>..»
I1W »|t«l«N HIM MMaMM IMWMtl • «MX I M)M*. C If* MQCMMt IMM N> I •!•«.%•. t »•....
HI*. N.MM
till m MMH MKtXMI MOtUOdli Id »>IMmi Mlllt MMt/W • CM». BHMM. MOMMI MC IMM l» I H. \». . » ....
IMI II NM9MM OM-MM UM MUMMTOM MMI MBMMMH WM/M • OMM. » . ft « «MttM MMMHI IMM M
•. • A «MM
itii H MMdioa OJM••!» ••* mi IMMH>»M»H •m»>mn. •»*•>«•• «a*u^ r.. it « MMMM MH«OI IMM i i
-------
MUM *
M»IM M|N IW MUHMMI
M> Ml Mil*
iimmaiiiTTiii T «/iw«6 • CHMW ••«*• •» • u «••«•• MHO *•»•••«««•
III* II MBMIIIM** •• M«MM «f Mil I*, _-
lilt II •**«•«• •»«!•• MMpM tMMQM «• ««MMM» «••! IMMfM • MM. «C . |l « ««• MWUUIt ||M| M I
)tlMMMMUrMMlMM>MUN»MMaa»aMM«N««0 CMWM* • «HB«H llwl |» |
t»M It
•ua»
NllNIOItHMI* MNMkllMt WI«Mia««WN W«UM • IHM (MM n ,
H« ItaiWIUMI «Nlrt»«««l-» «««»• «-«WM« •»*•*• •
MW tlMl fit I
7—^-A .^..^.^M^» .»^» . maa. a> ^IM IMM W I UMMMMM'»*„•»<•
MM H ••• ••« •«•"" »'• ' •""""• HadMMt »MDM*l
HM M«MIHM»*—«« -al«HMW-» «.«-«—•«» .WH« . •«•«. I • «H. >MMI I I f
•§N Mil U*H MMMM • •!M • •BMMMI MMOIIOt f MM M I
tST li«UM«Mt»««
HMHI »••'•"" 0-MMttllll,M«l M lf« IW/«» . ««>€• » ««U* •»• iWOlO. OiMI «• I
1/tMM • VOMOTMU MOOM* VraiMN l*Ml W I II •MWIIIM MMIM MM «•*• •
-------
110 •
Ml wtf HIM
<|ai^a ^^^Mft Ift^ft
WWW ^•^•» IVW
•»»!/•? • IVOMO. CA
•**•/•» • «MMM. I M
mw. I.B.
•• I
» I
• I
I I
»«•• ••«>.
M/ll/tf • *OM. I
INal M I IIMHMIMI* JMltCWI IIIMIIVMI '•»<•• f,,,t .. ,
•OOTWMIMI «OMHHM«
*** ' ItMM »•
-------
MAMt •
W Ml HIM
MM t»MMM
•M HI
M«l«* MfM IM)
IMVU'IC* tMMvl
M MMOMlMr
it i. M Nuer
»MMMII WWI Mtm
MMUM<
tutuu
l*«ll » I
I IMtl I I
IWMl IM I
• M*l M I
t I
!!••• MMM I HI
•Ml t»9MII*aMMW*MSMI
MM MOWMflBM^HMimi
Ml IlllffC UttMOft I
•own • aim a •«• WOJMNM *o
• •
i m.
IMMl H» I
IIMI HI I
II-4XMO* •> l
If I tl««'» MIKMtIMM «••*•«<« «§M III!
«tMiai«*
fl mOmr (IMMWMMN
IIOflOMI !(• IMMIM IMMkM* M>
MM
(!«!••«•••*
It
m
II f
kMW« MN»
•lift
MMBU
IINtl tl I IIIMIINI OtllU «'!>'•'
IMM II I
-------
M *M HIM
•UlM Mtn IM Ml
ii ouMUMt m a
IOMUWI. IM). IMtN. MOMH (Mil
••• !•• UMM. H««M MWM. MMMIM. MWI.
tlCMBMlC
OMMI. «MUUe «•. ».l.l.f-ll
l.l.l.t-M
1.1.!••«•••• MM. I.I.I*
l.4>
IM
MMMWtl
IMIUUCDMMII-««
Mil BMail-MMfH
>OC«
IMM M I
IHMl M I
IIMI • I
IHWl It |
fMM lf» I
— I
-------
II
M/M/M
M> M0 HIM
tUtw* MM* IMi
IIMB'lf* !»**•>
I.M.fr
•II
1MI MM1«
IMI Ml
MM Ml
UNI
IMIMM
Mil M
MM UNIMM:
•• tMl
» I
- I
MtfMMV • AM* t * . 11 « 4MCHICMMBMM I MM Ml I
Ml I
MB I
Ilk I
II I
•*«/•» • ffl MBBMMOMMI ' I MM M I
IWUUM1 MM ItlMMIM.
1MB ffin I I
(•MM MM* • I
*. t •
II'IWM • fOJMI. | • A
IMMI
IMri IM I
IMJI • |
Milt • Ml
INM Ml I HOW •(• •(OH Ml IOT4MIB IIMH •»!•••»•
-------
1*0 •»
•MU-
»MI ttUCIM»U«M«l UUMMI
Itt
"• «"""• "•* **"» ""«"*•"• •«. -,.
•:
» MM«M«mM*(MB*MM*«ltaNM«IHM» IVMM» • IWIW. | • AMR INMl W | .•«••,,.,•.%..„
I
-------
GUIDANCE ADDENDUM TO USL COMBINED AR
DOCUMENTS HAY BE VIEWED AT
U.S. EPA REGION 5
77 U. JACKSON BLVD.
CHICAGO, It- 60604-3590
Oi/29/97
MCI MTE AUTHOR
mi xiss *ssns
RECIPIENT
ZXMIMII
TITLE/BESCRIPTHW
PAGES
1 00/00/00 Cluner, R.,'USIM; et
•1.
2 00/00/00 Lutz, P., et il.
3 00/00/00 Angle, C.
4 00/00/00 Virious
5 00/00/00 lornschein, R., et
il.
i 00/00/00 Hatt, T., tt al.
7 00/00/00
8 00/00/00 Haddalmi, II., et
00/00/00 lomekein, R.
10 00/00/00 Rock, S., U.S. U.S. EPA
EPA/WHRL
•Tie Potential for Heavy Metal Eiposure Frot
Urean Sardent ud Soils' (USDA/Agricultural
Research Service)
Abstract: Mesttnity U Children Utfc'tijostre
U EnviranenUl Le«d: 1. Effects • Ml
HMken u* Cell-Mute* Icanltr* (IWTI
Mttrtctt •Kinctin of Childhood Lead: The
Oeeta topltute Diet Study'
M«truts Free •Hedicine/Letd* ILittiag of
Leed Stodiei)
Article: 'Soil Lead Blood Lead Relationship
u a Foraer Lead Mining Tom*
Eicerot free Jouraal Article: *Lead
CeataeiMtion of U.K. Outs and Soils and
UpUcatiOHJ for Childhood Eiposure: An
tome* of the tori of the Environmental
Ceochnistrr ResHrch 6rwp* (leoerial
Colleae of London)
Eicerft: 'lead and Coepoonds* (Integrated
Risk leforution Systee)
Pasert "lioavailability of Soil Boree Lead ia
Adults hf Stahle Isotope Dilution'
Paper: leirosthavioral Effect of Lead: A
Senary ttviei of Cross Sectional and
Lengitadieal Studies'
Paper: •Phytoreeediation'
46
21
10
12
10
17
IS
11
11 00/00/00 National Acadeey of
Sciences
12 00/00/00 USK/NOAA
Peolication: 'Measuring Lead Exposure in
Infants, Children, and Other Sensitive
Populations' (national Acadeey Press)
Technical neearandue: 'The Potential for
Biological Effects of Sedieent Sorhed
Cmtuinants Tested in the National States
and Trends Prograe* (MS DIM 32)
23S
-------
DOCI DATE
rsss c=ss
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT
XS3XSSSSS
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
PASES
13 05/00/61 rehoe, R.
14 OS/00/74 Rosen, J., et al.
15 00/00/75 Barry, P.
16 01/00/74 Barry, P.
17 00/00/77 Barry, P., ft *1.
18 .08/00/77 Yantel, A., et al.
OB/00/77 Daestra, T.
20 00/00/78 Ziealer, £., et al.
21 00/00/79 Birltrop, D., et <1.
22 00/00/80 Keller, C. and R.
Dohertr
23 04/00/80 Needleun, H.
24 00/00/81 Barry, P.
Lecture: 'The Hetabolism of Lead in Han in 21
Health and Disease' (Karbin Lectures: 1960)
Journal Article: 'Significance of Plasma Lead 6
Levels in Normal and Lead Intoxicated
Children (Environmental Health Perspectives)
Journal Article: 'A Comparison of 22
Concentratisns of Lead in Human Tissues'
(British Journal of Industrial Hedicine)
Journal Article: 'Complete Set of Data in 35
Support of 'A Comparison of Concentrations of
Lead in Human Tissues" (British Journal of
Industrial Hedicine)
Journal Article: 'Lead Concentrations in 13
Human Tissues* (British Journal of Industrial
Hedicine)
Journal Article: 'The Silver Valley Lead S
Study: The Relationship Betwen Childhood
Blood Lead Levels and Environmental Eiposure
(journal of the Air Pollution Control
Association)
Journal Article: 'Tosicolagical Properties of 11
Lead* (Environmental Health Perspectives)
Journal Article: 'Absorption and Retention of 6
Lead by Infants' (Pediat. Res.)
Journal Article: 'Effect of Particle Site on 5
Lead Absorption* (Arch. Environ. Health)
Journal Article: 'Bone Lead Hobilization in 9
Lactating dice and Ltad Transfer to Suckling
Offspring' (Toxicology and Applied
Pharmacology)
Journal Article: "Lead Exposure and Human 4
Health: decent Data on an Ancient Problem
(Technology Revie*)
Journal Article: 'Additional Set of Data in 8
Support of 'Concentrations of Lead in the
Tissue of Children" (British Journal of
Industrial Hedicine)
-------
«:i D&<; AUTHOR
«*ss sais ssssxs
RECIPIENT
rnotg
ccves
Ii 00/00/81 Birry, P.
2a 00/00/81 HeedleMn, H., et
al.
27 00/00/82 weedieun, H.
28 00/00/82 Start, A., et al.
29 09/02/82 lUhaffey, t., et »1.
JO 12/00/82 Freedhera, I.
31 00/00/83 Kneip, T., et al.
32 00/00/83 MeedlNW, H.
33 09/00/83 RTU, J., et al.
34 12/00/83 Hielke, H., et al.
35 12/00/83 Nanaffey, K.
36 00/00/84 Angle, C., et al.
Journal ArUclt: 'Conctnt rations of Leid in
the TISWM cf Children' (British Journti of
lesicine)
Journti Article: 'The Hetlth Effects ef Lou
Level Eiposfe to Lead* (Annual Revie* of
Public Hem1-
Joumil Arti:'.e: 'The Neurobthavioral '
Consciences ef Lo« Lead Exposure in
Childhood* iVeurobehavioral Tnicology and
Teratologr)
Journal Article: 'The Relationship of
Environmental Lead to Blood Lead Levels in
Children (Eiwiroauntal Research)
Journal Article: 'national Estimates of Blood
Lead Levels: United States, 1976-1980' (Ne«
Enoland Journal of Medicine)
Journal Article: 'Lead Laden Fremr rarts
Hazardous t: Kids' (Heiqhborhood Horks)
Journal Article: 'Biokinetic Hodelin; for
Hanalian Lead tetabolisa' (Neurotoiicologyl
Journal Article: 'Lead at Lw Dose and the
Behavior cf Children* (Acta Psychiat. Scand.)
Journal Article: 'Dietary Intake of Lead and
Blood Lead Concentration in Early Infancy'
(An J Bis Child)
Journal Article: 'Lead Concentrations in
Inner City Soils as a Factor in the Child
Lead Prebin* (Aterican Journal of Public
Health)
Journal Article: 'Sources of Lead in the
Urban Environotnt' (Aterican Journal of
Public Htaith)
Journal Article: 'Ooaha Childhood Blood Lead
aid Environmental Lead: A Linear Total
Eipowri Model' (Environecntal Research)
11
20
12
10
-------
MCI DAT! AUTHOR
RECIPIENT
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
•SSCI3SSSSSBXCS3S
PASES
00/00/84 Brnnctrtef, 3.
38 00/00/84 Rabinoaitz, M., et
il.
3° 06/08/84 Needletan, ct tl.
10 09/00/84 U.S. EPA
41 00/00/85 Clark, C.
42 -00/00/85 Quettee, S., et al.
43 00/00/85 Marcus, A.
44 00/00/85 Schroeder, S.
45 00/00/85 Bornichein, R., et
at.
46 00/00/85 Bornschein, 0., et
al.
47 01/00/85 Centers for Disease
Control
48 04/00/85 Ribino.it:, et al.
Journal Article: 'The Relationship Betieen 44
Air Lead and B'tood Lead ir Children: A
Critical Serin' (aci. Total Environ.)
Journal Article: 'Variability of Blood Lead '
Concentrations Dunn; Infancy* (Arch.
Environ. Health!
Journal Article: 'Tne Relationship Betieen 4
Prenatal Exposure ta Lead and Congenital
Anomalies' (Journal of the American Medical
Association)
Health Effects Assessment for Lead 45
Journal Article: 'Condition and Type of 5
Housing as an Indicator of Potential
Environmental Lead Exposure and Pediatric
Blood Lead Levels' (Environmental Research I
Journal 'Article: 'Evolution of Efficient 10
Methods to Sample Lead Sources, Such as House
and Hand Bust, in the Homes of Children'
(Environmental Research)
Journal Article: 'Hulticompartment Kinetic IB
Models for Lead: I. Bone Diffusion Models for
Long Ten Retention' (Environmental Research)
Journal Article: 'Separating the Effects of II
Lead and Social Factors on 18* (Environmental
Research)
Journal Article: 'The Cincinnati Prospective 14
Study of Lo» Level Lead Exposure mud Its
Effects of Child Development: Protocol and
Status Report' (Environmental Research)
Journal Article: 'The Influence of Social and 10
Environmental Factors on Dust Lead, Hand
Lead, and Blood Lead Levels in Young
Children' (Environiental Research)
Statement: 'Preventing Lead Poisoning in 62
Young Children'
Journal Article: 'Hoe* Refinishing, Lead 2
Paint, and Infant Blood Lead Levels'
(American Journal of Public Health)
-------
DOCI DATE AUTHOR
ssss nsss ssssss
RECIPIENT
**>**»*»
Tr'-E/OESCRlPTIOM
PACES
40 10/00/85 RibinoiitJ, R., et
il. *
SO 00/00/84 U.S.
51 00/00/86 roh, I., ft «1.
52 00/00/8* Cnswll, P., et il.
53 00/00/86 Bonwchein, R., tt
al.
00/00/86 Bellinger, et il.
55 00/00/86 Ribinwiti, H., ct
tl.
56 05/00/86 Huir, A., ct tl.
57 06/00/86 Bornschein, et al.
58 06/06/86 Bellinger, 0., it
al.
59 00/00/87 Bornschein, R., ct
al.
60 00/00/87 Needletan, H.
Journal Article: 'Lead in HiU and Infant 4
Blood: A Dose Response Itodel' (Archives of
Environmental Health)
Air Quality Criteria for Lead: Volumes' 2, 3, 0
and 4
Journal Article: 'A Comparison of Blood 3
Levels- in Dogs from Lead Rining, Lead
Smelting, Urban, and Rural Island Environment
(Aust. Vet. J.)
Journal Article: 'Chronic Lead mephromathy in 7
Queensland: Alternative Methods of Diagnosis'
(AustraliM/Ne» Zealand Journal of Medicine)
Journal Article: 'Exterior Surface Dust Lead, 0
Interior House Dust Lead, and Childhood Lead
Exposure in an Urban Environment*
(Environmental Health)
Journal Article: 'Lou Level Lead Exposure and 11
Infant Development in the First Year*
(Neurobehavioral Toxicology and Teratology)
Journal Article: 'Occurrence of Elevated 5
Protomormhyr Levels in Relation to Lead
Burden in Infants' (Environmental Research)
Journal Article: "Time Required for Elevated 2
Blood Lead Concentrations to Return to tareal
in Dogs' (Australian Veterinary Journal)
Paper: 'Exterior Surface Dust Lead, Interior 13
Dust Lead and Childhood Lead Exposure in an
Urban Environment* (Trace Metals in
Environment Health Conference)
Journal Article: 'Correlates of LM Level 8
Lead Exposure in Urban Children at 2 Yean of
Age* (Pediatrics)
Journal Article: 'Exterior Surface Dust Lead, 10
Interior House Dust Lead, and Childhood Lead
Exposure in an Urban Environment* (Environ.
Health)
Journal Article: 'Introduction: Biomtrcert in 4
Metrodevelopmental Toxicology* (Environmental
Health Perspectives)
-------
OC!« JSTE AUTHOR
:::: ::=: :::::=
RECIPIENT
&SSS3SXSS
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
PASES
:1 00/00/87 Schutt, A., et al.
-.: 00/00/87 Nerdleman, H.
s! 00/00/87 Hoffer, B., et al.
lii 03/05/67 Minnesota Department
of Hetltb
45 04/23/87 Belliaicr, D., et
il.
t: 05/00/87 U.S. EPA
67 OS/30/87 Fulton, et il.
68 00/00/88 Fergusson, D.,.et
69 00/00/86 Brocthaas, A., it
il.
70 00/00/88 Silbergeld, E.
71 00/00/88 Silbergeld, E., tt
al.
journal Article: 'Kinetics of Lead in Blood 10
After the End of Occupational Eipnure'
(Scand J dork Environ Health)
Journal Article: 'Lo» Level Lead Eipasure in 5
the Fetus and Ycung Child* (Neurotoiicology)
Journal Article: 'Toxic Effects of Lead in 7
the Developing Nervous System: In
Oculoeiperimental Models' 'Environmental
Health Perspectives)
Memorandum Transmitting Report to Minnesota 100
Legislature: 'Lead Exposure and Health
Effects of Children1
Journal Article: 'Longitudinal Analyses of 7
Prenatal and Postnatal Lead Eiposure and
Early Cognitive Development* (Men Ergland
Journal of Medicine)
Revie« and Recoutndations on a Lead in Soil 109
Guideline
Journal Article: 'Influence of Blood Lead on 6
the Ability ani Attainment of Children in
Edinburgh' (The Lancet)
Journal Article: 'A Longitudinal Study of 14
Dentine Lead Levels, Intelligence, School
Performance, and Behavior-Part II: Dentine
Lead and Cognitive Ability' (J. Child
Psychol. Psychiatr.)
Journal Article: 'Exposure to Lead and 12
Cadmium of Children Living in Different Areas
of North Nest Germany: Results of Biological
Honitaring Studies 1982-1984" (Occupational
Environmental Health]
Journal Article: 'Lead and Osteoporosis: 13
Mobilization cf Lead from Bone in
Postmenopautal Homen' (Environmental
Research]
Journal Article: 'Lead and Osteoporosis: 2
Mobilization cf Lead from Bone in
Postaienopausal Homen* (Environmental
Research)
-------
DOCI DATE AUTHOR
Etsx »a*s :z::ss
72 00/00/88 Higg, tt al.
73 00/00/88 Hrtichael, ft., et
il.
74 00/00/88 Nriifu, J., et «1.
75 00/00/88 Rosen, J.
RECIPIENT
***«****«
76 03/07/88 Mielke, H.
77 03/09/88 Marcus, A., it il.
78 05/00/88 U.S. EPA
79 07/00/88 ATSOR/Public He*1th
Service/USOHHS
BO 08/25/88 HcHichicI, et il.
81 12/00/88 MittMft, U, et al.
82 00/00/89 Hinun, 0., et al.
TITLE/DESCRIPTION PA6ES
Journal Article: 'Port Pirie Cohort Study: 7
Childhood Blood Le*d and Meuropsychological
Development tt Age T*o Years' (Journal o<
Epidemiology and Community Health)
Journal Article: 'Port Pirie Cohort Study: 7
Environmental Exposure to Lead and Children's
Abilities it the Age of Four Years* (He-
England Journal of Redicine)
Journal Article: "Quantitative Assesnent of 5
korldiide Contuination of Air, Hater and
Soils by Trace totals' (Nature)
Publication Eicerpt: 'The lexicological 10
Importance of Lead in Bone: The Evolution and
Potential Uses of lane Lead Measurements by I*
Ray Fluorescence to Evaluate Treatment
Duteous in Moderately Lead ToiicChildren* •
(Biol. Monitoring of Toiic Metal)
Paper: 'Lead in Soil: Issues and Guidelines' 10
(Procecdingi of Chapel Hill, NC Conference)
Paper: 'Modeling -the Blood Lead Soil Lead 14
Relationship' (Proceedings: Environmental
Beortttstry and Health]
Fact Sheet: 'Drinking Hater and Lead' 6
Nature and Extent of Lead Poisoning in Sol
Children in the United States: A Report to
Congress
Journal Article: "Port Pirie Cohort Study: 8
Environment Exposure to Lead and Children's
Abilities at the Age of Four Years' (Nn
England Journal of Medicine)
Journal Article: 'Lead in Bone: IV. 11
Distribution of Lead in the Human Skeleton*
{Archives of Environmental Health)
Journal Article: *A Neuropsychological Study 8
of Children Nith Elevated Dentine Lead Level:
Assessment of the Effects of'Lead in
Different Socio-Ccanotic Groups'
(Neurotnicol. Teratol.)
-------
30:i D«;E AUTHOR
===; =::; sssss=
RECIPIENT
BXSCM3XC
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
ss r sss sss s ssss ra s
PAKE
S! 3C ••:?••?? Thompson, 6., et al.
34 00/00/39 Rjbino.it:, H., et
al.
95 00/00/89 Nadhavan, 5., et il.
8« 00/00/89 Hatzakis, A., et al.
87 00/00/89 ftushak, P.
00/00/89 Srant, L., et al.
89 00/00/89 Dietrich, I., et al..
90 00/00/89 Dietrich, K., et al.
91 00/00/89 ftushak, P., et al.
92 00/00/89 Hushak, P., et al.
Journal Article: "Blood Lead Levels ind 13
Children's Behavior; Results fro* the
Edinburgh Lead Study' (J. Child psychol.
Psychiatr.;
Journii Article: "Blood Leid-Tooth Leid 4
Relationship Along Boston Children* (Bulletin
of Environmental Contamination and
Toxicologr)
Journal Article: 'Lead in Soil: Rec«t*ended 7
Naxiiui Penissible Levels' (EnvironeenUl
Research)
Publication Excerpt: *12 Psychometric 12
Intelligence Deficits in Lead Exposed
Children' (Lead Exposure and Child
Development)
Publication Excerpt: 'Biological Monitoring 16
of Lead Exposure in Children: OvervieN of
Selected Biokinetic and lexicological Issues'
(Lead Exposure and Child Development)
Publication Excerpt: 'Effects of Lo* Level 6i
Lead Exposure on Pediatric Heurobehavioral
Development: An International Assessment'
(Lead Expesure and Child Development)
Publication Excerpt: "Neurobehmoral Effects 7
of Fetal Lead Exposure: The First Year of
Life' (1989: Lead Exposure and Child
Development; Smith, «., et al; eds.)
Publication Excerpt: 'Neurobehavioral Effects 11
of Fetal Lead Exposure: The First tear of
Life* (Lead Exposure and Child Development)
Report: 'Determination of Numbers of Lead 19
Exposed American Children as a Function of
Lead Source' (Report to U.S. Congress on
Childhood Lead Poisoning)
Report: 'Prenatal and Postnatal Effects of 25
Lou Level Lead Exposure (Report to U.S.
Congress on Childhood Lead Poisoning)
-------
DCCI DATE
ssss :::=
AUTHOR
TITLE/DtSCSlPTION
PA8E:
93 01'00/89 Rosen. J., et. *:
94 •)5/30/89 U.S. EPA/QERR U.S. EPA
9) 09/07/89 U.S. EPA/OERR/OWE U.S. EPA
96 10/00/89 U.S. EPA
97 10/23/89 fliddaugh, J., et il.
98 00/00/90 Graziano, J., it al.
99 00/00/90 Dietrich, l.t et al.
100 00/00/70 Minneke, 6., et al.
101 00/00/90 Soyer, R.
102 01/11/90 Needleun, et al.
103 01/26/90 U.S. EPA/OERR U.S. EPA
Journal Article: V.ine I-Ray Fluorescence
of Cortical Sere Lead Compound «th the
CiNa'EDTA Test in LeaJ Toxic Children: Public
Health Irpiications' (Environeental Health)
Intern Final Guidance on Preparing Superfund
Docuients: The Proposed Plan, Record of
Decision, Explanation of Significant
Differences, Record of Decision Aundunt
•OSiTS Directi/e 19355.3-02)
Nemorandum re: Interii Guidance on
Establishing Soil Lead Cleanup Levels at
Superfund Sites IOSKR Directive W35S.4-02)
*
Technical Support Docuient on Lead
Health Hazard and Risk Assessient Fro*
Eiposure to Heavy Hetals in Ore in Skagna*,
Alaska, Final Report
Journal Article: 'Determinants of Elevated
Blood Lead During Pregnancy in a Population
Surrounding a Lead Saelter in tosovo,
Yugoslavia* (Er.virontental Health
Perspectives)
Journal Article: 'Lead Exposure and
Neurobeluvioral Development in Later Infancy*
(Environmental Health Perspectives)
Journal Article: 'Results from the European
Kulticenter Study on Lead Neurobuicity in
Children: Implications for Risl Assessment*
(Neurotoxico!. Teratol.)
Journal Article: 'Transplacental Transport
-------
DCCI DATE AUTHOR
ssss r=r= ssssss
RECIPIENT
S8SXSSX3S
TriE/DESCRiriOM
10* 02/01.'90 Chaney, R.. USDA
10e. 05'07/90 U.S. EPO.'OSWER U.S. EPA
'Acuity of E::»ach Secretions in fisans,
V.s, *nd ?i;i. ind the Potential Uportance
3f Staaach fr :-. Biotvailability of. Ph IP
Soil sind Kir* Hastes'
(iMirandue r«: Intern guidance on
Establishing •::! Lead Cleanup Levels at RCRA
Ficihties
106 03/28/90 U.S. EPA/QSHER U.8. EPA
10? 09/00/90 U.S. EPA/OERR/ORD U.S. EPA
109 09/00/90 U.S. EPA/OSNER U.S. EPA
109 09/27/90 Hushak, P.
110 11/00/90 Marcus, A., et al.
Ill 00/00/91 Nahaffey, K.
112 00/00/91 Nilsson, U., et al.
113 00/00/91 Rosen, J., et al.
114 00/00/91 RabinoMitz, H.
US 00/00/91 Bellinger, D., et
al.
Perfariance c4 s.ist Assessient in RI/FS
Studies Conducted by PIPs (OSMER Directive
9835.15>
Er.;ineering E^Uetin: Sol! Hashing Treattent
(E»A/540/2-90/317)
Quick Refererce Fact Sheet: 'Superfnad LBR
Guide M Cr.i Edition): Obtaining a Soil and
Debris TreatiSiUty Variance for Retcdial
Actions' (Superfund Publication 9347.3-MFS!
Paper: 'Bastr: Intestinal Absorption of Lead
in Children a-d Adults: Overviw of
Biclogical ar.i Biophysico Chetical Aspects*
(Syeposiue o* the Bioa vail ability and Dietary
Exposure of Lead!
Paper; 'Inte' Site Coiparisons of
Edvironmtal Lead Uptake* (Syeposiui on
Bioavailabihtj)
Journal Artieie: 'Biokinetics of Lead During
Pregtiancy* I'^daiental and Applied
Toxicology)
Journal Article: 'Kinetics of Lead in Bone
«d Blood after the End of Occupational
E«posnre* (P*artacol. Tosicol.)
Journal Article: 'Sequential Heasuments of
Bone Lead Certent by L I-Ray Fluorescence in
CaNa2 OTA Treated Letd Toxic Children
(Environieniil Health Perspectives)
Journal Art::le: 'ToxicoVinetics of Bone
Lead* (Envircniental Health Perspectives)
Journal Article: 'Height Eain and Maturity in
Fetuses Eipcsed to Lo* Levels of Lead*
(Environmental Research)
?2
10
-------
OC:i 5»'E AUTHOR
=:;r ssss £=5=73
RECIPIENT
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
PAEES
He -X/CO/?! Hush*., P.
11" 00'0v/9l Centers for Diseases
Control/U.S. Public
Health Service
116 02/00/91 U.S. EPA/OSHER I].?. EPA
i:e 02/21/91 Reilly, H., U.S. EPA
120 02/24/91 OPTS/U.S. EPA
121 06/00/91 Hu, K.
122 07/02/91 U.S. EPA/OSKR U.S. EPA
123 08/29/91 OSNER/U.5. EPA
12< 06/29/91 U.S. EPA/OSMER U.S. EPA
125 09/00/91 U.S. EPA/QERR U.S. EPA
126 10/00/91 Centers far Desease
Control/U.S. Public
Health Service
127 10/03/91 U.S. EPA
12E 11/04/91 Royer, «.., U.S. EPA;
et *i.
Honograph: 'Bistro-Intestinal Absorption of 17
Lead in Children and Adults: Overview of
Biological Biephysicochemical Aspects
(ChMical Species and Bioavailabihty)
Pamphlet: 'Impo-tart Facts About Childhood 2
Lead Poisoning Prevention1
Figures froi Guidance Document: 'Land 3
Disposal Restrictions: Summary of
Requirements' lOSit* Directive 9934.0-1A)
Testimony of the Miinistntor/U.S. EPA 24
Before the Couittee on EnviroMtnt and
Public Dorks, U.S. Senate
Nworandw re: Final Agency Lead Strategy 44
Journal Article: 'A SO Year Folio* up of 7
Childhood Pluebisa1 (MDC)
Suppletental Suidance on Performing Risk 0
Assesswnts in RI/FS Studies Conducted by
PRPs (OSMER Directive 9835.15a)
Hetorandui re: Update on OSKR Soil Lead 4
Cleanup Suidance
Hctorandua re: Update en Soil Lead Cleanup 4
Guidance
Guidance for Conducting Treatability Studies 45
Under CERCLA: Soil Hashing, Interii Guidance
(EPA/MO/2-91/020A)
Statement: 'Preventing Lead Poisoning in
Young Children*
118
Report: Aaalysii of Lead in Soil and Bust 85
Data
Paper: 'Control Technologies for Defunct Lead 23
Battery Recycling Sites; Overview and Recent
Developments' (Third International Seminar or
Battery Haste Management I
11
-------
DOM DATE AUTHOR RECIPIENT
5=5= ss= = =:ssss xsssssass
12? 12/00/9! U.S. EFA/OERR U.S. EPA
'•TLE/SE-C-iFTiOK
PAfit:
130 12/13/91 U.S. EPA/USHER U.S. EPA
131 00/00/92 Beck, B.
132 00/00/92 Baghurst, P., et al.
133 00/00/92 American Academy of
Pediatrics
134 00/00/92 Bellinger, D., et
al.
IIS 00/00/92 Freeman, 6., tt al.
136 08/00/92 Lead Detection and
Abatement Report
137 OB/03/92 Rothenberg, S., et
al.
138 08/04/92 Harcus, A.
139 09/00/92 U.S. EPA/OEM U.S. EPA
Risk Assessment Suidasce isr Super fund: 6*
Volume l-'-'jian Healtn Evaluation Manual
(Part E- Je.eiopmest o* *isk Based
Pr-inm-r Remedutiin Jails) [INTERIR]
(Publica*.i:n 9265.7-018}
HeHrandli :orvarding Attschetf Interii Risk j6
Assesste^t BuiCance: Veiuie 1-Huun Health
Evaluatior Ranual (Part 3: 'Development of
Risk Based Preliminary Fetediation Goals')
IQSitR Di'ertive I°2E5.7-01B)
Journal Article: 'Ait Update on Exposure and B
Effects of Lead' (Fundamental and Applied
Toxicology)
Journal Article: 'EmirmeenUl Eipoture to S
Lead and Children's Intelligence at the Age
of Seven Years* (Men England Journal of
Medicine]
Journal Article: 'Lead Psiioninj: Froi 7
Screening to Prieary Prevention' (Pediatrics)
Journal Article: *L(w Level Lead Eiposure, 6
Intelligence, and Acadecic Achieveeent: A
Long Ten follon Up Study' (Pediatr.)
Journal Article: 'Relative Bioaviilability of 11
Lead free (lining Haste sail in Rats*
(Fundamental and Applied Toxicology)
Article: *NCN York State Legislature Passes 1
Bill Requiring Lead Screening for Young
Children, Pregnant ttomen*
Paper: 'Simple nodding cf Haternal Lead. 14
Levels During Pregnancy: The Role of
Extrinsic and Intrinsic Factors'
(International Conference on Lead and Other
Trace Substances)
Presentation: 'Comparative Approaches to 23
Superfund Site Assessaerts for Young Children
Exposed to Lead' (Processings: Environmental
Geochemistry and Health!
Engineering Bulletin: 'Selection of Control 18
Technologies for Remediation of Lead Battery
Recycling Sites' (£PA/5*:/S-92/Oin
-------
AUTHOR
RECIPIENT
3SCSXSSSS
TlTlE/teSCRIPTHW
PA6E3
XZCXZ
:<• 20'00/f: u.s. EPA/OERR/OKO u.s. EPA
;«: 11/00/72 lUsseratn, 6., et
14: Ov'OO/93 O'Fiaherty, E.
H! 00/00/93 Dittrich, I., et al.
1«< . 00/00/93 Leggett, R., et al.
145 00/00/93 National Research
Council
14i 04/00/93 U5DHHS
147 04.07/93 Ruff, H., et al.
146 05/00/93 U.S. EPA/OERfi/QRD U.S. EPA
149 07/00/93 OERR/U.S. EPA
150 07/00/93 OERR/U.S. EPA
Engineering Bulletin: 'Slurry Halls* 8
IEPA/540/S-92/OCS!
Journal Article: 'Independent Effects of Lead 1C
Esposure and Iron Deficiency Ar.eiia on
Deveiaptental Gutceie at Age 2 Years*
(Journal of Pediatrics)
Journal Article: 'Physiologically Based 14
Hodels for Bctie Seeking Einents: IV.
Kinetics of Lead Disposition in Hums'
ITomologr *n(! Applied Phareicologyl
Journal Article: 'The Developmental 7
Consequences of Ln to Boderate Prenatal and
Postnatal Lead Eiposure: Intellectual
Attainient in the Cincinnati Lead Study
Cohort Fol loving School Entry* (Ncurotoxicol.
Teratol.)
Paper: 'An Eletentary Method for lapleeenting 13
Cotple* Biokinetic Itodels* (Health Physics
Society)
Report: "Heasu'ing Lead Exposure in Infants, ITS
Children, and uther Sensitive Populations'
(1993: National Acadeey Press)
Toiicological Profile for Lead 0
Journal Article: 'Declining Blood Lead Levels 6
and Cognitive Changes in Moderately Lead
Poisoned Children* (Journal of the American
Medical Association)
Engineering Bulletin: 'Solidification 13
Stabilisation of Organics and Inorganics
(EPA/S40/S-92/013)
Urban Soil Lead Abateeent Detonstratioo 193
Project Voluee 1: Integrated Report [Review
Draft] (EPA/600/AP-9VOOU)
Urban Soil Lead Abateeent Deeonstration
Project Volute 2: Boston Report
(EPA/aW/AJ>-9:/00!b)-
756
13
-------
DCCI DATE CUTHCP
rsss ssss sss?=3
RECIPIENT
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
PASES
151 OVOC/93 QEBS/U.S. EPA
07/00/93 OERR/U.S. EPA
153 OB/00/93 Ouener:, P. and A.
Troutan
!S4 08/00/93 Canadian Rinistry of
EnvireflKftt »nd
Energy
155 09/01/93 U.S. EPA/OSHER U.S. EPA
154 12/00/93 Leggett, R.
157 00/00/94 Barois, A., et <1.
158 02/00/91 OERR/U.S. EPA
159 03/00/94 Adler, J.
140 03/09/94 Stipp, 3.
161 03/23/94 OSKR/U.S. EPA
162 03/23/94 U.S. EPA/OERR U.S. EPA
Urb».-. Sox: lead Abateeent Desonstration 546
Project Voluie 3: Baltiiore Report
! EPA/600/ AM3/OOU)
Urban Soil Lead Abateaent Dennitratim 272
Project Voluie 4; Cincinnati Report
(EPA/600/aP-93/ld)
Journal Article: 'Iteste Hiniiization Charges 4
Up Recycling of Spend Lead Acid Batteries*
(Haziat Nor Id)
Publication: 'Guidelines for the Protection 123
and ItanafHent of Aquatic Sedittnt fiutlity in
Ontario1 •/AttachmU (ISM 0-772M24B-7)
He* Policjr on Performance on Ritk tasesueets 0
luring RI/F5 Conducted by PRP< (OSKR
Directive 9835. 15b)
Journal Article: "An Age Specific Kinetic
Nooel of Lead Netabohn in Hutans*
(Environiental Health Perspectives)
Publication Eicerpt: 'Estiutint the
Contribution of Lead Based Paint to Soil
Lead, Dust Lead, and Childhood Blood Lead
(Lead in Paint, Soil, and Out)
Guidance Manual for the Integrated Exposure
Uptake Biokinetic Hodel for Lead in Children
(Publication 9285.7-15-1, EPA/540/R-93/081)
Journal Article: 'Setting the Lead Out*
IBartage)
Journal Article: 'Probe Finds Errors, But No
Hitconduct, in Dork by Lead Poisoning' (Hall
Street Journal)
Metoraodu re: Tranuittal of Guidance Hamal
for the Integrated Eipowre Uptake Biokinetic
Node! for Lead in Children and lEUBt Jtodel,
Version 0/990
Neeoraadno re: Transtittal of Guidance Hanual
for the Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic
Itodel for lead in Children and IEUBI Model,
Version O.Wd
19
256
14
-------
}CI DAT:
11: :=:: izssss
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
PAGES
it! 04.00/94 Ribinoi.it:, «., et
164 04-00/54 ATSW/U.S. Public
HeiHti Service
65 06/OV?4 von Undern, t., et
146 07/14/94 OSUER/U.S. EPA
147 -07/15/94 OPPTS/U.S. EPA
148 07/27/94 Eoldun, L.
149 07/27/94 Brody, D., et ii.
170 07/27/94 Pirkle, J., et tl.
171 00/00/95 O'Flaherty, E.
172 04/00/95 Roy F. keston, Inc. U.S. EPA
Journal Article: 'Variability of Blood Ltid 4
Concentrations During Infancy" .(Archives of
•nwonwntal He* 1th)
Report: 'Hcltiiite Leid and Cidnui Exposure 254
Study «ith Biological Harkers Incorporited*
(DRAFT) .
Paper: 'Reducift; Children's Blood Liad Levels 23
*t the Bunker Hill Superfund Site in northern
Idaho, USA Through Health Intervention and
Soil/Dust Source Control Measures* 11994
International Lead Abatement Rendition
Conference)
Heeorandue re: Revised Interii Soil Lead 25
Guidance for CERClA Sites and ROM Corrective
Action Facilities (OSMER Directive
•9SS5.4-12)
Heurandu re: Guidance on Residential Lead 32
Based Paint, Lead Cmtaeinated Dust, and Lead
Cmtuinated Soil
Editorial: 'Childhood Lead Poisonieg io 19941 2
(Journal of the Aterican Medial Association)
Journal Article: 'Blood Lead Levels in the 7
U.S. Population* [Phase 1 of the Third
National Health and Nutrition Eiuination
Survey] (Journal of the American Mini
Association)
Journal Article: 'The Decline of Blood Lead 6
Levels in the United States' (Tot Rational
Health and Nutrition Esatiaation Surveys]
(journal of the American Medical Association)
Journal Article: 'Physiologically Based 12
Models for Bone Seeling Elemts: V. Lead
Absorption and Disposition in Childhood*
(Toiicology and Applied Pharmacology)
Baseline Huoan Health Risk Assessment for the 57
California Gulch Superfund Site: Part C
(Evaluation of tarter Scenario) IDMFT]
IS
-------
oa:> DATE AUTHOR
SKS: csr: sss=s£
REC1P1EHT
ssseasrsz
TITLE/DESCRIPTION
PAst:
:*! 00/00/96 Sulsan, B., »t il.
174 04/17/96 Ku, R., «t al.
17! 04/17/96 Hu, H., et il.
176 04/17/96 Grady, D., NM York Public
Tiats
177 10/00/96 U.S. EPA/USHER U.S. EPA
17B 12/00/96 U.S. EPA/Technical U.S. EfA
Reviei Workgroup for
Ltad
179 12/00/96 U.S. EPA/TRW. U.S. EPA
Journal Article: 'laptct of Blood Lead in
Chiidrt* and Adults Follcraic; Relocation froi
Thei' Source of Eiposure and Contribution of
Skeletal 'issue te Blood Lead* (Bull.
Environ. :ontai. Tosicol.)
Journal Article: 'A Longitudinal Study of Lou
Level Lead Exposure and lepairtent of Renal
Function: The Noraative Aging Study (Journal
of the Aierican Hedical Association)
Journal Article: 'The Relationship of
and Blood Lead to Hypertension: The Hortative
Aging Stud;' (Journal of the American Medical
Association)
Nemptptr Article: 'Unexpected Dangers Found
in Ln Levels of Lead*
decent Developments for In Situ Treattent of
Hetal Contaainated Soils (EPA-J42-R-96
Oil] [DRAFT]
Report: 'Recoeeendations of the Technical
ReviM Horkgroup for Lead for an Interu
Approach to Assessing Risks Associated uth
Adult Exposures to Lead in Soil'
Report: RecoMendations of the Technical
Revie* Horkgroup for Lead for an Interu
Approach to Assessing Risks Associated «th
Adult Exposures to Lead in Soil
40
43
16
-------
U.S. EPA/REGION 9
OSWER DIRECTIVE COMPENDIUM
UNITED SCRAP LEAD SITE
COMBINED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
CIRCLED ITEMS ARE
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
OSWER DIRECTIVE CLASSIFICATION
November 1996
PROGRAM
NUMBER
Administrative (AAQSUER)
fSwerfund (OERRp
"RCRA (OSH)
Underground Storage Tanks (OUST)
(yuperfund Enforcement (OMPCQ
RCRA Enforcement (OWE)
9000 - 9199
C9200 - 3399)
f 9400 - 959$)
*
9600 - 9799
9900 - 9999
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
9010.
9011-
9012-
9013-
9016-
9016-
9010-
9019-
9021-
9022-
9023-
9024-
9026-
9026*
9037-
Policy
Ofgantatton and Function*
PuMeAfMm
we
Contncli
Ubmry Syvtwrn
PubHeatlom and Communication* Material
Printing and DMributton
TravalandTranapoftatton
•^•A^ AaMa^kA^^Wkaai Gm^*im*H*^
IMH rivOTOTnlB OJfWPIIlP
ProoramRavlawandRaportln
9062
9083- RttMichandOtvatopmtnl
-------
dr
rtrath
•221 - CERCU8
•223 • ClMfMCw BUMQMWJf PlVpMMHMMB PfOQIMl
•228- Claim
•230- Community lUtetteiw
•234- Compliance
•240- Contract Lab Program
•242- Contract*
•270- FMtlbttyStuaas
Wa>f a* ^^^N^W^Bv v ^Mwl^B^^^V
•276- Fnanotal MatMQafnafit
92*3- OrewidWMirConlamlMlton
•318. National Envtronmtntal Policy Act
•320- NationalPrtortttwUrt
•328-
•330- Off^MtPoley
•347- RCRA
•360-
•360- RamovalProctduraa
•37S- StatePaitieliMtlon
opnee OP SOUP WASTE
•420-
RCRA
•lOSWPolleyai
impwfiMfitMlon
•nd ProctdurM
-------
9430-9432
•433-
9490-9497
•800-9804
HazardouaWaata Managamant Syatam
Rulamaklng Pattdona
ktantflteaten and Uatinfl of Hazardous WaatM
•470-9477 TnMtmanta,8toragaandDlapoaalFi
tatrattvaRMulramanta
IINy Ttehirieal ftoqulrMmnta
n Warta and 8pMHte Typw of FacllKtoa
8t*t* Authorintlofi
Pubtte Participation
OFFICg OP UMPgRQROilMD STORAQg TAtlltt
9610
9630-9649
Grant Ouldanca
Tachnteal OuManca
MOO-MM CERClAenfOfcamant
•870
OuMane*
TachnkalOuklanea
Otter
MOO-MM RCRAErrforcafnant
9900-9929
9930-9949
9960-9969
M70-MM
Policy
OuWanea
Tachnleal Ouldanca
Managamant Ouldanca
Othar
-------
REGION 5 • OSHER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: <*) - ELIMINATED ,
DIRECTIVE *
9010.00
9010.008
9010.01
9010.1
9010.15 (*)
9010.15-01
9012.10
9012.10*
9012.10a-I (*)
9012.10-b (*)
9013.0-1 <*)
9013.15
9013.15-39 (*)
9013.15-30
9018.00-01
9018.00-02 (*)
9019.00
9024.00-01 (*)
9024.10 (*>
9028.00
9028.OOa
9028.OOb
9028.OOc
9029.00
QfflE
12129/88 Assurance of Hazardous Waste Capacity: Guidance to State Officials
10/16/89 Agency Review of SARA Capacity Assurance Plans
08/14/91 Headquarters & Regional OSVIER Ombudsman Functions
.11/25/85 Follow-up to Quarterly Waste Mgmt Directors Meeting
02/11/86 OSWER Priorities
09/29/88 OSUER Integrated Health & Safety Policy for Field Activities
05/25/88 Redelegatlon of Authority Under CERCLA & SARA
06/17/88 Revision of CERCLA Judicial Settlement Authorities Under Delegations 14-13-8 & 14-14-E
97/19/88 Waiver of Concurrence on De Minimi s Generator Settlements
08/18/88 Redelegatlon of Civil Judicial Settlement Authorities under Delegation 14-13-B & 14-14-E
10/16/85 Management of Regional Activities
04/17/86 OSWER Directives System Manual
05/07/87 DJrect Hailing of Policy & Procedural Guidance Directives to States
03/01/91 OSWER Directives System Catalog Guidance & Policy Issued through 03/91
02/01/86 Training Strategy Report
09/30/87 OSWER Training Policies & Procedures. Vol I & II: Appendices
,01/24/94 Senior Resource Official Approval of Sole Source Procurement
09/04/86 Review of Unliquidated Obligations
03/28/90 Management Assistance for Superfund Cooperative Agreements
07/29/88 OSWLR's System Life Cycle Management Guidance
03/22/89 OSWER' s System Life Cycle Management Guidance: Part Three
01/04/90 OSWER's System Life Cycle Management Guidance: Part Three
Analysis
05/18/92 OSWER 's System Life Cycle Management Guidance: Part Three
MODELING. APPLICATION SECURITY MANAGEMENT
''07/01/94 Assessment Framework for Groundwater Model Applications
Six Practice Papers
Practice Paper: Benefit-Cost
Practice Papers: DATA
9200.0-03
* * * SUPERFUNO (OERR) * * *
09/01/89 OSUER Superfund Directory
-------
REGION s - OSMER DIRECTIVES LIST wuoust im
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
DIRECTIVE *
9200.04-13
9200.1-01A
9200.1-07
9200.1-11
9200.1-12
9200.2-01
9200.2-02 (*)
(9200.2-03J
9200.2-2
9200.2-221
9200.3-01C
9200.3-010
9200.3-01G
9200.3-1
9200.3-02
9200.3-03
9200.
9200.
-05
-05
9200.3-07
.3-
.3-
.3-
9200.3-08
9200.3-09
9200.3-10
9200.3-11
9200.3-14-1
DATE
05/24/94 Management of Records of Decision (ROOS)to Facilitate Public & Agency Access
10/04/88 OERR Administrative Procedures Manual
03/31/89 FY-89 OERR Strategic Management Planning Initiative
02/20/92 'Accessing the $50 Million Set-aside 1n the Remedial Action Budget for Quick Response at
NdUonal Priorities List (NPL) Sites
05/01/9? Superfund Progress Report - Spring 1992 (PB92-963265)
05/22/96 Focus Areas for Headquarters Support for Regional Decision Making
07/06/89 Unaddressed NPL Sites
12/15/89 Accelerated Response at NPL Sites Guidance (Superfund Management Review: Recommendation
No. 2?)
01/30/90 Interim Guidance on Addressing Immediate Threats at NPL Sites (Superfund Management
Review: Recommendation No. 22)
01/25/94 Evaluating Immediate Threats at NPL Sites
11/01/86 Superfund Program Evaluation Handbook (FY'87 - Final)
09/01/95 Superfund Today
07/01/89 Superfund Program Management Manual FY'90. Vol 1 & 2
06/01/90 Superfund Program Management Manual FY'91, Vol 1 & 2
04/03/92 Correction of FY'92 Superfund Program Management Manual Definitions
05/01/87 ' Superfund Emergency Response Actions - A Sumnary of Federally-Funded Removals
10/24/86 Implementation Strategy for Reauthorized Superfund: Short Term Priorities for Action
10/28/86 FY'87 Superfund Comprehensive Accomplishments Plans
06/07/88 Flexibility 1n FY'88 Superfund Regional Extramural Operating Plan (EXPIRED)
08/10/93 Clarification of FY'93 Superfund Program Management Manual Definitions
12/27/88 Preparation of the 2nd Quarter Proactive Memo
12/11/89 Flexible Funding 1n the Regional. Extramural Operating Plan - Superfund Management Review.
Recommendation 110
12/19/89 Establishing a Construction pipeline
08/01/90 In-House Remedial Investigation & Feasibility Study (RIFS) Initiative SupeRfund Management
Review: Recommendation 45.8,2)
12/27/90 Final Policy on Setting RIFS Priorities
10/01/93 Superfund Program Implementation Manual FY 1994 Vol. I 4 II
-------
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) • ELIHINATtD
DIRECTIVE i
DAIE
9200.3-14-2
9200.3-17
S200.3-18/-18FS
9200.3-19/-19F*
9200.3-20
r9200.3-23FS)
9200.4 -00(a)
9200.4-02-2
9300.4-05
9200.4-06A
9200.4-07
9200. • 1
9200.4-14
^9200.4.153
9200.5-006
9200.5-13
9200.6-1151
9200.5-154
9200.5-162
9200.5-2151
9200.5-2151
9200.5-2161
9200.5-2161
9200.5-2161
9200.5-2161
9200.5-2161
9200.5-2161
9200.5-251FS
9200.5-253FS
9200.5-254FS
04/01/94
09/21/94
05/01/95
'05/01/95
05/01/95
09/01/96
03/31/89
04/01/90
09/30/96
02/22/90
03/02/90
02/09/87
.01/19/95
07/31/96
11/01/90
10/01/94
02/01/91
01/01/95
12/01/95
06/01/90
10/01/90
04/01/90
06/01/90
09/01/90
12/01/90
05/01/91
07/01/91
11/01/89
11/01/89
11/01/89
IIILE
Superfund Program Management Manual FY'94
Integration of Environmental Justice Into OSWER Policy. Guidance. & Regulatory Development
Environmental Justice Action Agenda
Waste Programs Environmental Justice Accomplishments Report
Waste Programs Environmental Justice Accomplishments Report Executive Summary
The Role of Cost In the Superfund Remedy Selection Process
Staff Responsibilities for Managing OERR Documents
OERR Publications Standards Toolbox.
Pre-CERCLIS Screening Guidance
Uniform Format for OERR Policy/Directive Meuas - Revised Instructions
Coordination of Quick Reference Fact Sheets 90-Day Study • I31A
Guidelines for Producing Superfund Documents
Consistent Implementation of the FY 1993 Guidance on Technical Impracticability of Gixund-
Water Restoration at Superfund Sites
Reducing Federal Oversight at Superfund Sites with Cooperative and Capable Parties
Superfund: Environmental Progress
The Environmental Response Center
Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990
Inland Area Contingency Plan Region 5
Presumptive Remedies for Soils. Sediments. & Sludges at Wood Treater Sites
Superfund Design & Construction Update Vol. 4. No. 3
Suporfund Design & Construction Update Vol. 4. No. 4
Superfund Records of Decision Update Vol. 5. No. 4
Superfund Records of Decision Update Vol. 5. No. 5
Superfund Records of Decision Update Vol. 5. No. 7
Superfund Records of Decision Update Vol. 6. No. 1
Superfund Records.of Decision Update Vol. 6. No. 2
Superfund Records of Decision Update Vol. 6. No. 3
Innovative Technology - In-SUu Vitrification
Innovative Technology • Best Solvent Extraction Process
Innovative Technology - Glycolate Dehalogenatlon
-------
DTRFCTTVE §
9200.5-321FS
9*00.5-4011
9200.5-402A
9200.5-723
9200.5-748
9200.6-02
9200.6-041
9200.6-303(9S-U
9200.7-01(8)
9200,7-01(b)
9200.7-01(abc)
9200.7-01-1
9200.7-021
9200.7-021
9200.9-02
9200.9-02
9201.1-01 (*)
9201.01A
9202.1-04
9202.1-05 <*)
9202.1-06 (*)
9202.1-09
9202.1-10-1
9202.1-10-2
9202.1-12
9202.1-14
9202.1-20
04/01/90
12/01/90
05/01/92
09/01/90
09/01/90
04/01/86
10/01/92
05/01/95
02/10/89
03/13/89
03/31/89
05/01/89
08/01/92
03/01/94
07/28/93
02/05/96
11/27/91
06/01/89
05/22/92
07/07/92
09/04/92
. 02/11/93
03/01/93
03/01/93
07/29/93
02/02/93
03/01/94
REGION 5 • OSUER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 4
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED •
. IIILE
Contact Laboratory Program Analytical Results Database (CARD)
CORAS Bulletin. Vol. 1. No. 10
Contracting & Subcontracting Guide to the Superfund Program
National Priorities List (NPL) Sites: Michigan
National Priorities List (NPL) Sites: Wisconsin
National Priorities List (NPL) Docket Guidance
Directory of Superfund Rulemaklng Dockets. Vol. 1. No. 1
Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
Superfund Program Directives, Issued from 8/1/88 through 1/31/89
Superfund Program Directives. Issued During February 1989
Catalog supplement: Ordering Information & Catalog Addendum through (torch 1989
Interim Report Superfund Publications System
Superfund & Enforcement Program Publications Update. Vol. 1. No. 1
Superfund & Enforcement Program Publications Update, Vol. 1. No. 5
Procedures to Ensure that CLP Laboratories Are Not Paid for Non-complaint or Unusable Data
Procedures to Ensure that CLP Laboratories Are Not Paid for Non-complaint or Unusable
Data: First Quarter FY 96
Implementation of the Superfund Alternative Remedial Contracting Strategy (ARCS): Report
of the Administrator's Task Force
A Management Review of the Superfund Program
Identification of a Senior Superfund Official for Addressing Special NPL Site-Related
Issues
Required Contracts Management Training for Regional Superfund Personnel
Initiative to Streamline the Alternative Remedial Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Contracts'
Award Fee Process
Guidance on Program Management Activities Under ARCS
Compendium of Good Ideas, Models of Success & Lessons Learned. Vol. 1. Highlights
Compendium of Good Ideas. Models of Success & Lessons Learned. Vol. 2. Source Book
Guidance on Preparing Independent Government Cost Estimates (IGCEs)
Current National Superfund Program Priorities
tost Management Manual for the Superfund Remedial & Enforcement Programs
-------
DIRECTIVE *
9203.0-06
9203.1-01
9203.1-03
9203.1-03A
9203.1-03/SUP
9203.1-051
9203.1-051
9203.1-08
9203.1-10
9203. MOPS
9203.1-11
9203.1-13
9203.1-14
9204.1-01
9208.0-10
9208.0-11
9208.0-12
9208.0-13
9210.0-01
9221.0-02A
9221.0-1
9221.0-2
9221.2-01FS
9223.0-1A
9225.0-02
9225.0-3
9225.1-01
9225.3-01FS
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 5
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
<
DAE TITLE
06/04/90 Superfund Responsiveness Summaries (Superfund Management Review: Recommendation I43E)
04/07/92 Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)
07/07/92 Guidance on Implementation of the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM) Under CERCLA
& the NCP :
10/26/92 Exercising Flexibility Through the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)
08/22/94 Guidance on Accelerating CERCLA Environmental Restoration at Federal Facilities
12/01/92 Status of Key SACM Program Management Issues - Interim Guidance. Vol. 1, No. 1
12/01/92 Enforcement Under SACM - Interim Guidance, Vol. 1. No. 3
04/27/93 Further Direction on Implementing the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)
07/12/93 Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM) — Transmlttal of Questions & Answers Bulletin
& Issue Submtttal Form
07/01/93 Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM) - Questions & Answers
09/14/93 Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM) •- Coordination Strategy
01/28/94 Expectations for Full Implementation of SACM
03/08/94 Update on SACM Implementation
04/20/92 Establishment of OERR Records Management Program
11/06/90 Guidance on Alternative Dispute Resolution In Enforcement Actions
05/01/93 Enforcement Mediation • Status Report on The Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution In
Environmental Protection Agency Enforcement Actions
10/01/91 Superfund Enforcement Mediation - Regional Pilot Project Results
04/01/92 Superfund Enforcement Mediation - Case Studies
•06/27/95 Transmlttal of Guidance for Data Collection at State-lead NPL Sites
05/30/90 CERCLIS Data Handling Support Policy Statement
03/04/86 Data Handling Support for CERCLIS
03/31/86 CERCLIS Data Handling Support Policy Statement
04/01/91 CEHCLIS - UasteLAN - CleanLAN
11/01/85 Chemical Emergency Preparedness Program (Interim Guidance)
04/25/84 Forwarding Claims to Headquarters
11/25/85 Notification of Restrictions on Reimbursement of Private Party Costs for Removal Actions
04/19/89 Procurement Under Preauthorlzatlon/Mixed Funding OSWER Directive 9225.1-01
11/01/89 Reimbursement to Local Governments for Emergency Response to Hazardous Substance Releases
-------
OTftgCTIVE*
9225.3-01FS-A
9230.0-02
9230.0-03
9230.0-38
9230.0-3A
_9230.0-3BJ
r9230.0-03CD
9230.0-04
9230.0-05
9230.0-06
9230.0-08
9230.0-09
9230.0-13
9230.0-15
QPO.0-16)
9230.0-17
9230.0-18
9230.0-19
9230.0-20
9230.1-01
9230.1-02
9230.1-03
9230.1-04
9230.1-06
9230.1-10FS
9230.2-01
9230.2-02
9234.0-02
REGION 5 - OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 6
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED (
PATE HB£
10/01/92 Reimbursement to Local Governments for Emergency Response to Hazardous Substance Releases
05/09/83 Superfund Conmunlty Relations Policy
09/01/63 Conmunlty Relations In Superfund: A Handbook - Interim Version
03/22/85 Community Relations Activities at Superfund Enforcement Sites -- Interim Guidance
05/05/86 Conmunlty Relations. 1n Superfund: A Handbook - Revised
06/01/88 Conmunlty Relations 1n Superfund: A Handbook - Interim Version
01/01/92 Conmunlty Relations In Superfund: A Handbook
10/17/83 Community Relations Guidance for Evaluating Citizens Concerns at Superfund Sites
10/02/85 Conmunlty Relations Requirements for Operable Units
06/04/90 Superfund Responsiveness Sunmarles
03/07/90 Planning for Sufficient Conmunlty Relations
.08/31/90 Conmunlty Relations: Use of Senior Environmental Employees In Superfund
12/19/90 Minimizing Problems Caused by Staff Turnover
06/15/90 pole of Conmunlty Interviews 1n the Development of a Conmunlty Relations Program for
Remedial Response
11/05/90 Making Superfund Documents Available to the Public Throughout the Cleanup Process. &
Discussing Site Findings & Decisions as They are Developed
, 09/28/90 Using State & Local Officials to Assist 1n Conmunlty Relations
01/21/91 Incorporating Citizen Concerns Into Superfund Decision-making
09/18/90 Proposed Method to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Conmunlty Involvement 1n Superfund
11/30/90 Innovative Methods to Increase Public Involvement 1n Superfund Community Relations
03/20/87 Interim Guidance on Technical Assistance Grants
01/11/88 Technical Assistance Grants Program Activities Prior to the Issuance of the Interim Final
Rule
06/01/88 Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical Assistance Grant Program
06/01/88 Superfund Technical Assistance Grants Program - Regional Guidance Manual
01/31/90 Technical Assistance Grants: Waivers of $50,000 Cap & Grant Amendments
03/01/95 Technical Assistance Grant (TAG) Audits
09/28/88 OERR Conmunlcations Planning Process
09/26/88 Peer Review and Approval of Abstracts and Papers
10/02/85 CERCLA Compliance with Other Environmental Statutes
-------
REGION S • OSUER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
DIRECTIVE
9234.0-4.
9234.1-03
9234.1-06
C 9234.2-01FS-)
r9234.2-03FSJ
£ 9234.2-04FS:)
r 9234.2-OSFSJ
9234.2-06FSJ
9234.2-07FS3
( 9234.2-09FS:)
9234.2-10FS
9234.2-11FS
9234.2-15FS
9234.2-25
9234.3-001
9240.0-1
9240.0-2
9240.0-02A
9240.0-02B
PATE TITLE
08/19/86 Consideration of RCRA Requirements 1n Performing CERCLA Responses at Mining Waste Sites
07/09/87 Interim Guidance on Compliance with Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements
08/08/88 CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual
11/01/87 CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual (DRAFT): Clean A1r Act & Other Environmental
Statutes
03/13/89 Regional ARARs and LDR Contacts
12/27/89 'Applicability of Land Disposal Restrictions to RCRA & CERCLA Ground Water Treatment
Re1nject1on (Superfund Management Review: Recommendation No. 26)
05/01/89 ARARs Q's & A's
07/01/91 ARARs Q's ft A's: General Policy. RCRA. CWA. SOWA. Post-ROD Information, ft Contingent
Waivers
09/01/89 CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual - Guide to Manual
12/01/89 CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual - Overview of ARARs Focus on ARAR Waivers
10/01/89 CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual - RCRA ARARs: Focus on Closure Requirements
12/01/89 CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual -CERCLA Compliance with State Requirements
02/05/90 ARARs Fact Sheet Entitled "CERCLA Compliance with the CWA & SOWA"
04/01/90 CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual - Summary of Part II CM, TSCA. and Other
Statutes
05/01/90 ARARs Q's ft A's Compliance with the Toxldty Characteristics Rule: Part I
05/01/90 ARARs Q's ft A's Compliance with Federal Water Quality Criteria
07/01/90 ARARs Publications Reference Sheet DRAFT
07/01/90 ARARs Q's ft A's: State Ground-Water Ant 1 degradation Issues
07/01/91 ARARs Q's ft A's: Compliance with New SDWA National Primary Drinking Water Regulations
(Phase II)
10/04/93 Guidance for Evaluating the Technical Impracticability of Ground-Water Restoration
(Interim Final)
'07/01/90 ARARs Short Guidance Quarterly Report
.10/01/84 User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Program
03/20/86 Analytical Support for Superfund
11/20/90 Further Guidance on OSWER Directive 9242.0-02 Analytical Support for Superfund
07/06/92 Extending the Tracking of Analytical Services to Potentially Responsible Party-Lead
-------
REGION 5 • OSUER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
8
DIRECTIVE*
9240.0-03
9240.0-05
9240.0-OSA
9240.0-25
9240.1-05-1
9242.2-01B
9242.2-02
9242.2-03 (*)
9242.2-05 (*)
9242.2-06
9242.2-06a
9242.2-08FS
9242.2-1A
9242.3-03
9242.3-05
9242.3-06
9242.3-07 (*)
9242.3-08
9242.3-08A
9242.3-09 (*)
9242.3-10 (*)
DATE HUE
Superfund Sites (Supplemental Guidance on OSWER Directive 9240.0-2A)
98/18/88 Superfund Analytical Review & Oversight
09/01/89 Decentralization of Superfund Bottle Repository Functions
03/08/93 Updated "Specifications & Guidance for Obtaining Contaminant-Free Sample Containers" April
1992 & Designated as OSUER Directive 9240.0-05A
01/19/93 Reassignment of CLP Transportation Functions
03/17/94 USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review
(FINAL)
10-01-87 Emergency Response Cleanup Services Contracts (ERCs) User's Manual
05/10/89 Site-Specific Contracting for Removals
11/29/91 Administrative Guidance for the FIT to ARCS (FIT/ARCS)
01/22/92 Implementation of ARCS Task Force Plan Recommendations
01/31/92 Superfund Contracts Management Issues
08/05/92 Resources for Preparing Independent Government Estimates for Remedial Contracting Work
Assignments
05-01-93 Superfund Response Action Contracts
06/01/86 Emergency Response Cleanup Services (ERCS) Contracts Users' Manual
07/06/84 Procedures for Initiating Remedial Response
07/25/84 Rem II Contract Award Fee Performance Evaluation
08/25/86 Management of Files from REM/FIT Contract Closeout
03/09/87 Implementation of the Decentralized Contractor Performance Evaluation and Award Fee
Process for Selected Remedial Program Contracts
12/10/91 Revision of Policy Regarding Superfund Project Assignment Between Alternative Remedial
Contracting Strategy Contractors & the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
06/08/95 Clarification of Policy Regarding Work Assignments to the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE)
07/29/92 Use of Time & Materials & Cost Reimbursement Subcontracts for Remedial Actions Under the
Alternative Remedial Contracting Strategy
03/16/92 Congressional Limits for FY'92 Alternative Remedial contracting Strategy (ARCS) Program
Management Costs
-------
DIRECTIVE *
9242.4-01A
9242.5-02
9242.5-02A
9242.6-01 (*)
9242.6-02
9242.6-03
9242.6-04
9242.6-06
9242.6-07
9242.6-08
9242.6-09
9242.6-13
9242.6-16FS
9250.1-01
9250.2-01
9250.3-01
9250.3-02
9260.1-09
9260.2-00
9260.3-00
9260.5-01
9260.5-02
9260.5-02A
9272.0-01
9272.0-2
REGION 5 - OSMER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 9
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
«
DATE TITLE
07/01/87 Technical Assistance Team (TAT) Contracts Users' Manual
09/26/88 Mbdel Performance Standards for Superfund Project Officers. Deputy Project Officers, and
Work Assignment Managers/Delivery Order Officers
12/13/90 Model Performance Standards for Superfund Project Officers. Deputy Project Officers, and
Work Assignment Managers/Delivery Order Officers
05/01/89 ARCS Work Assignment Management - Field Guide
01/03/89 Guidance for Organizing ARCS Contract Files
08/09/89 Need for Contract Officers Authorization Before Contractor Activation
10/31/89 OERR Organizational Conflict of Interest Review and Approval Program (Superfund Management
Review: Recommendation 146.C)
03/28/90 Quality Assurance Review for Extramural Projects; Environmental Measurements
08/31/90 Long Term Contracting Strategy for Superfund (Superfund Management Review: Recommendation
E.2)
12/05/90 Total Quality Management (TQM) and quality Assurance (QA) In Superfund
12/17/90 Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Superfund—Implementation Framework
09/08/92 Performance Tracking Under ARCS Contracts
06/01/95 Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Superfund--Implementation Update
03/03/83 Policy On Cost-Sharing At Publicly-Owned Sites
05/05/83 Policy On Cost-Sharing of Immediate Removals at Publicly-Owned Sites
05/13/83 Waiver of 10 Percent Cost-Share for Remedial Planning Activities at Privately-Owned Sites
06/03/83 Guidance on Implementing Waiver of 10 Percent Cost-Share for Remedial Planning
03/24/86 Delegation of Remedy Selection to Regions (Under Delegation 114-5)
04/01/84 Delegations of Authority Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response. Compensation. &
Liability Act (CERCLA)
04/16/84 Delegations of Authority Under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) Which are
Applicable to the Superfund Program
05/25/88 Redelegatlon of Authority Under CERCLA & SARA
09/24/87 Superfund Internal Delegations of Authority
04/01/90 Superfund Internal Delegations of Authority
04/02/84 Implementation of CERCLA Strategy at Federal Facilities
12/03/84 Initial Guidance on Federal Facilities CERCLA Sites
-------
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED ,
10
DIRECTIVE*
9272,0-03
9272,0-04
9272.0-05
9275.1-01
9275.2-01
9280.0-02 <*)
9280.0-03
9283.1-01
9283.1-02
9283.1-03
9283.1-04
9283.1-06
9285.0-01
r92B5.2-03>
"9285.2-041
285J2-OS3
r§28S.2-06FS3
9285.2.07FS
9285.2-08FS
»•
928S.3-01
9265.3-02
DATE HUE
08/19/85 Responsibilities for Federal Facilities
08/19/8!> Federal Facilities
08/26/85 Responsibilities for Federal Facilities
07/31/84 Removal Financial Management Instructions
09/21/84 Remedial Financial Management Instructions
08/06/85 Policy on Flood Plans and Wetlands Assessments
05/09/94 Considering Wetlands at CERCLA Sites
03/24/86 Recommendations for Ground Water Remediation at the Mill creek, PA Site
12/01/88 Guidance on Remedial Action for Contaminated Groundwater at Superfund Sites
10/10/90 Suggested ROD Language for Various Ground Water Remediation Options
10/01/90 Subsurface Contamination Reference Guide
05/27/92 Considerations 1n Ground-Water Remediation at Superfund Sites and RCRA Facilities -
Update
08/16/88 OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Policy (Renumbered. Formerly 9010.15)
02/19/93 OSWER integrated Health and Safety Standard Operating Practices
11/84/84 Standard Operating Safety Guide Manual
07/05/88 Standard Operating Safety Guides
06/01/92 Standard Operating Safety Guides
01/01/85 Field Standard Operating Procedures Manual: FSOP ft Site Entry
01/01/85 Field Standard Operating Procedures Manual: FSOP 17 Decontamination of Response Personnel
01/01/85 Field Standard Operating Procedures Manual: FSOP *8 A1r Surveillance
04/01/85 Field Standard Operating Procedures Manual: FSOP 16 Work Zones
04/01/85 Field Standard Operating Procedures Manual: FSOP 19 Site Safety Plan
04/01/91 Establishing Work Zones at Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites
04/01/91 Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response: RCRA TSD and Emergency Response without
Regard to Location
04/01/91 Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response: Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sues and
RCRA Corrective Actions
03/15/84 Occupational Safety & Health Technical Assistance and Enforcement Guidelines for Superfund
Hazardous Waste Site Activities
'07/07/87 Employee Occupational Health I Safety
-------
DIRECTIVE i
9285.3-05
9285.3-06
9285.4-01
9286.4-02
9285.4-03
9285.4-06
9285.5-r
r928S.6-0;ft
9285.6-04FS
9285.6-1
f928S.7-OU
^5285.7-02)
"9285.7-01A]
^9285.7.018)
f9285.7-OlQ
^9285.7-05^
r92B5.7-05FSj
^9285.7-090,
r9285.7-09AFS}
T928ST-
^923577-
f9S85.7-15-D
REGION 5 • OSUER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 11
NOTE: (*) • ELIMINATED
•
DAE TITLE
05/22/90 Hazmat Team Planning
03/01/90 Priority for Health & Safety Requirements. Especially Medical Surveillance Requirements
for EPA Employees Who Support OSWER Programs
10/01/86 Superfund Public Health Evaluation Manual
03/11/87 Guidance for Coordinating ATSDR Health Assessment Activities with the Superfund Remedial
Process
04/07/88 Health Assessments by ATSDR 1n FY'88
11/21/91 ATSDR Health Consultations Under CERCLA
11/16/87 Updated Reference Dose & Cancer Potency Numbers for Use 1n Risk Assessments
01/14/86 DRAFT Superfund Exposure Assessment Manual
03/25/91 Human Health Evaluation Manual. Supplemental Guidance: "Standard Default Exposure Factors'
03/01/94 Emergency Respbnders Agreements for Fund-Lead Remedial Actions
12/17/86 Superfund Risk Assessment Information Directory
03/01/89 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund - Environmental Evaluation Manual (EPA/540/1-
89/001A)
03/01/89 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund — Environmental Evaluation Manual. Vol. II.
Interim Final (EPA/540/1-89/001)
12/01/89 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Part A -• Health Evaluation Manual. Vol. 1.
Interim Final (EPA/540/1-89/002)
12/31/91 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Vol. I. Human Health Evaluation Manual. (Part B.
Development of Risk-based Preliminary Remediation Goals, Interim)
12/01/91 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Vol. I. Human Health Evaluation Manual. (Part C.
RUk Evaluation of Remedial Alternatives. Interim)
'10/01/90 Guidance for Data UseabllUy 1n Risk Assessment (Interim Final)
09/01/90 Guidance for Data UseabllUy 1n Risk Assessment
04/01/92 Guidance for Data UseabllUy 1n Risk Assessment (Part A). Final
05/01/92 Guidance for Data UseablHty 1n Risk Assessment (Part A). Final
05/01/92 Guidance for Data UseabllUy 1n Risk Assessment (Part B). Final
OS/26/92 Implementing the Deputy Auminlstrator's Risk Characterization Memorandum
02/01/94 Guidance Manual, for the Integrated Exposure Uptake Blok1netlc Model for Lead in Children
01/04/94 < Guidance on Use of Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) Values
-------
DIRECTtUE*
9285.9-02
9285.9-03
9285.9-04
9285.9-05
9285.9-06
9285.9-07
9295.0-02
9295.1-01
9295,2-02
9295.2-04
9295.4-01
9295.5-01
9295.5-02
9295.9-05
9318.0-05
9319.0-01FS
9320.1-01
9320.
9320.
9320.
9320.
-02
-03
-04
-07
08/12/94
02/03/89
05/01/89
06/01/89
06/30/89
09/29/89
10/31/89
11/01/89
05/07/92
04/02/85
06/24/83
12/03/84
03/21/90
'11/05/90
04/05/85
06/14/85
09/29/89
04/13/87
02/01/90
02/02/82
06/28/82
1 05/17/83
07/17/84
05/29/87
REGION 5 • OSWER OlftECTlVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 12
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED ,
TlTlf
Role of the Ecological Risk Assessment in the Baseline Risk Assessment
Inauguration of the OSC/RPN Program
OSC/RPN Support Program - Mentoring (Pilot. 3 attachments)
Superfund University Training Institutes - Request for Workshop Attendees
On-Scene Coordinator and Remedial Project Manager Special Recognition Awards
Mandatory Training Requirements of OSCs and RPMs
Mandatory Comnunlty Relations Training - Superfund Management Review Implementation
Product Recommendation: |43.P(1)
Implementing the Mentoring Program for Newly-Hired OSCs/RPHs - Superfund Management Review
Implementation Product (Recommendation I45JL1)
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Between the NOAA and the USEPA Concerning the
Notification and Coordination of Activities Pursuant to the CERCLA ,
MOU Between ATSOR and EPA
Joint Corps/EPA Guidance
Interagency Agreement Between The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ft U.S.
EPA In Executing P.L. 96.510 (CERCLA)
EPA/U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Payment Process. Direct Cite/Revised Reimbursement
Methods ' '
MOU Between ORD and OERR
MOU Between FEMA and EPA for the Implementation of CERCLA Relocation Activities Under PL
96-510
Implementation of EPA/FEMA MOU on CERCLA Relocations
Mandatory Training Requirements for OSCs and RPMs
Environmental Review Requirements for Removal Actions
The Final National Contingency Plan: New Directions for Superfund
Guidance for Establishing the National Priorities 11st
Guidance for Establishing the National Priorities list
Promulgation of the National Priorities List
National Priorities List Categorization
Interim Guidance for Consideration of Ss 105(g) and 125 of the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorlzatlon Act of 1986 Prior to NPL Proposal of Special Study Waste Sites
-------
REGION 5 • OSNER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) -ELIMINATED
13
DIRECTIVE *
9320.1-05
9320.1-09
9320.1-11
9320.2-03A
9320.2-038
9320.2-03C
9320.2-05
9320.2-06
9320.2-07
9320.2-2
9320.3-01
9320.3-02
9320.3-03
9320.3-04
9320.3-05
9320.3-06
9320.3-08
9320.4-01
9320.7-01FS
9320.7-02FS
9320.7-04FS
9330.1-01
9330.1-2
9330.2-01
f9330.2-04,
:9330.2-OSJ
9330.2-
DtiE . TITLC
09/10/86 RCRA NPL Listing Policy
08/21/86 Listing Municipal Landfills on the NPL
04/30/93 Discussions with the Public Concerning NPL Listings
12/01/88 Procedures for Completion and Deletion of Sites fran the NPL
12/29/89 Update to the "Procedures for Completion and Deletion of NPL Sites' Guidance Document
Regarding the Performance of Five-Year Reviews
02/19/92 Update No. 2 to 'Procedures for Completion and Deletion of NPL Sites"
10/08/92 Amendment to Historical Definitions of NPL Deletion Start and Completion Dates
06/21/93 NPL Construction Completion Definition at Bloremedlatlon and Soil Vapor Extraction Sites
08/26/93 Additional Guidance on "Worst Sites" and "NPL Caliber Sites" to Assist in SACM
Implementation
04/04/PC Completion and Deletion of NPL Sites
05/12/83 Guidance for Updating the National Priorities List
01/18/84 Instructions for Promulgating the National Priorities List Update
05/23/84 Procedures for Updating the National Priorities List
12/10/84 Guidance for Proposed NPL Update 13 - February 1985
04/30/85 NPl! Information Update - Update 14
09/17/85 Updating the National Priorities List: Update 16 Proposal
02/05/90 CERCLIS Listing
04/18/85 Intern Information Release Policy
11/01/90 The Revised Hazard Ranking System: An Improved Tool for Screening Superfund sites
11/01/90 The Revised Hazard Ranking System: Qs and As
11/01/90 Closing the NPL Book Under the Original HRS
01/28/83 Requirements for Selecting an Off-Site Option 1n a Superfund Response Action
12/03/86 Evaluation of Program and Enforcement-Lead RODs for Consistency with RCRA Land Disposal
Restrictions
05/06/85 Procedures for Planning and Implementing Off-site Response Actions
04/15/86 Discharge of Uastewater from CERCLA Sites 1n POTWS
05/12/36 CERCLA Off-site Policy: Providing Notice to Facilities
09/14/89 Notification of Out-of-State Shipments of Superfund Site Wastes
08/01/90 CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS TreatablUty Hanual
-------
DIRECTIVE
9335.0-2SA
f9335.3-02FS-O
C 933S.
9340.1-01
(9340.1-023
9340.2-01
9345.0-01'
9345.0-04
9345.0-051
9345.0-07
9345.1-02
9345.1-05
9345.1-08
9345.1-1
9345.1-1SFS
.9345.1-16
9345.1-16FS
9345.2-01
9345.2-02
9345.3-01
9345.3-03FS
9347.0-01
C9347.1-023
CJ347.2-01J
'9347.3-01FS]
REGION 5 • OSMER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) • ELIMINATED
«
TITLE
14
DATE
03/01/91 Guide to Discharging CERCLA Aqueous Wastes to Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs)
02/08/89 Use of Removal Approaches to Speed Up Remedial Action Projects
11/01/89 A Guide to Developing Superfund Records of Decision
11/01/89 A Guide to Developing Superfund Proposed Plans
03/20/84 Participation of Potentially Responsible Parties 1n Development of Remedial Investigations
& Feasibility Studies Under CERCLA
01/26/96 Revised Policy On Performance of Risk Assessments During Remedial Investigation
/Feasibility Studies (RIFS) Conducted by Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs)
02/27/85 Preparation of Decision Documents for Approving Fund-Financed and "Potentially Responsible
Party Remedial Actions Under CERCLA
01/01/88 Preliminary Assessment Guidance FY'88
.11/07/88 Policy Requiring Utlllztlon of Brochure on Preliminary Assessment Petitions
05/01/92 ECO Update. Vol. 1. No. 4
12/08/92 Standard Document for Remedial Site Assessment Decisions
02/26/87 Expanded Site Inspection: Transitional Guidance for FY'88
09/09/92 Guidance for Performing Site Inspections Under CERCLA
12/26/91 Regional Quality Control Guidance for NPL Candidate Sites
01/07/86 Coninent on Draft Sampling Strategy to Support MRS Scoring
08/24/93 Guidance on Conducting Site Inspection Prlorltlzatlon Activities
10/21/93 Integrating Removal and Remedial Site Assessment Investigations
09/01/93 Integrating Removal and Remedial Site Assessment Investigations
02/12/88 Pre-Remedial Strategy for Implementing SARA
03/10/89 Regional Pre-r«ned1al Program Objectives for FY'89 and First Quarter of FY'90
01/30/89 Request for Designation of State Natural Resource Trustees
04/01/92 Guide to Management of Investigation - Derived Wastes
03/03/86 Interim RCRA/CERCLA Guidance on Non-Contiguous Sites and On-S1te Management of Waste and
Treatment Residue
04/17/89 Policy for Superfund Compliance with the RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions Under RCRA
06/05/89 Land Disposal Restrictions as Relevant and Appropriate Requirements, for CERCLA
Contaminated Soil and Debris
07/01/89 Superfund LDR Guide II: Overview of RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs)
-------
DIRECTIVr i
9347.3-02FS
f3347.3-03Fp
9347.3-04FS
g347.3-OSFj
9347.3-06FS
9347.3-06FS
9347.3-06BFS
^9347.3-07F!p 12/01/89
9347.3-09FS
9347.3-10FS
r9347.3-UFSJ
9347.3-15
9355.0-3
C9355.0-4A,;
C935S.O'4B1
9355. 0-7A
9355. 0-7B
9355.0-08
9355.0-10
9355.0-12
9355.0-14
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 15
NOTE: (*) • ELIMINATED
DATE TITLE
07/01/89 Supei fund LDR Guide #2: Complying With the California List Restrictions Under Land
Disposal Restrictions (LDRs)
07/01/89 Superfund LDR Guide #3: Treatment Standards & Minimum Technology Requirements Under Land
Restrictions Under Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs)
07/01/89 Superfund LDR Guide #4: Complying With the Hammer Restrictions Under Land Disposal
Restrictions (LDRs) i
07/01/89 Superfund LDR Guide 15: Determining When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are Applicable
to CERCLA Response Actions
07/01/89 Superfund LDR Guide I6A: Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatab1l1ty Variance for Remedial
Actions
09/01/90 Superfund LDR Guide *6A (2nd Edition): Obtaining a Soil and Debris TreatabllUy Variance
for Remedial Actions
09/01/90 Superfund LDR Guide #6B: Obtaining a Soil and Debris TreatabllUy Variance for Remedial
Actions
Superfund LDR Guide 17: Determining When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) are Relevant
and Appropriate to CERCLA Response Actions
10/01/90 Superfund LDR Guide 18: Compliance with Third Third Requirements under the LDRs
09/01/90 A Guide to Del1sting of RCRA Wastes for Superfund Remedial Responses
04/01/91 Guide to Obtaining No Migration Variances for CERCLA Remedial Actions
10/01/90 CERCLA Compliance with the RCRA Toxldty Characteristics (TO Rule: Part II
10/01/91 Compendium of CERCLA ARARs Fact Sheets and Directives
07/16/82 Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Site Ranking System - A Users Manual (HW-10)
06/01/86 Superfund Remedial Design and Remedial Action Guidance .
06/01/95 Remedial Design/Remedial Handbook
10/17/86 Data Quality Objectives Development Guidance for Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Site
Remedial Response Activities (DRAFT)
03/01/87 Data Quality Objectives for Remedial Response Activities (Development Process)
04/01/85 Modeling Remedial Actions at Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites
09/01/85 Remedial Action Costing Procedures Manual
11/26/85 Suggested Actions to Keep Projects Moving During Funding Suspension
12/01/87 A Compendium of Superfund Field Operations Methods
-------
DIRECTIVE f
9355.0-15
9355.0-16
9355.0-17
9355.0-19
9355.0-20
9355.0-21
9355.0-23
9355.0-24
9355.0-24A (*)
9355.0-25
9355.0-25A <*)
9355JL-26
27FD
)-28
9355.0-29
r93SS.O-30
9355.0-36
9355.0-36
9355.0-38FS
9355. (
H55.0-47FS
9355.0-46FS
3S5.0-49FS
9355. 1-02
9355.1-1
REGION S • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
TITLE
16
OttE
04/02/86 Third Quarter Superfund Strategy
05/30/86 Superfund Slowdown
07/03/86 Superfund Slowdown
12/24/86 Interln Guidance on Superfund Selection of Remedy
'07/23/87 RIFS Improvements
07/24/87 Additional Interln Guidance for FY'87 Records of Decision
10/26/87 Interim Policy on Funding for Gmmd ft Surface Water Restoration Actions
12/28/87 OSWER Strategy for Management Oversight of the CERCLA Remedial Action Start Mandate
12/22/92 The SARA "200" Remedial Action Starts Requirement
12/09/88 Statement of Policy: Requirements for Using Removal Authorities for Speeding Up Remedial
Projects
07/06/89 Use of Removal Approaches to Speed Up Remedial Action Projects
02/21/89 Advancing the Use of Treatment Technologies for Superfund Remedies
04/01/90 A Guide to Selecting Superfund Remedial Actions
06/15/89 Control of Air Emission from Superfund Air Strippers at Superfund GroundMter Sites
08/13/90 Scoper's Notes. An RIFS Costing Guide
04/22/41 Role of the Baseline Risk Assessment 1n Superfund Remedy Selection Decisions
12/11/91 FY'92 Themes for Regional Coordination to Support Continuous Improvements of Super fund's
Remedial Program
05/01/92 Guide for Conducting Treatablllty Studies Under CERCLA - Chen leal Dehalogenatlon
05/01/92 Chemical Dehalogenatlon Treatablllty Studies under CERCLA: An Overview
06/01/92 Remedial Action Report • Documentation for Operable Unit Completion
03/01/95 Guidance for Scoping the Remedial Design
09/01/93 Presumptive Remedies: Policy and Procedures
09/01/93 Presumptive Remedies: Site Characterization and Technology Selection for CERCLA Sites With
Volatile Organic Compounds 1n Soils
09/01/93 Presumptive Remedies for CERCLA Municipal Landfill Sites
06/01/95 Remedial Design/Remedial Action (RD/RA) Handbook
09/01/87 The RPM Primer • An Introductory Guide to the Role and Responsibilities of the Superfund
Remedial Project Manager
01/27/86 Draft Federal-Lead Remedial Project Management Handbook
-------
RESIGN 5 • OSUER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) • EUNINATED
17
DIRECTIVE «
9355.2-1
9355.3-01
9355.3-01FS1
935L3-01FS2
t.-ra.-»B'HfrSi
tvK-.iicfl.mif
9355.3-02FS-3
9355.3-03
9355.3-05
9355.3-06
9355.3-07
9355.3-08
9355.3-09
9355.3-11
9355.3-11FS
9355,3-17
9355.3-20
.4-01
eMwraa
t^atffiE^
rVTC
9355.4-07FS
^9355.4-1!
DUE
12/01/86
10/01/88
11/01/89
11/01/89
11/01/89
03/01/90
07/01/89
04/01/91
04/01/91
02/01/88
04/25/88
02/14/89
05/01/89
11/30/89
03/30/90
02/02/91
09/01/90
03/23/93
06/25/93
08/15/90
09/07/89
08/29/91
01/26/90
10/18/89
01/01/92
07/14/94
TITLE
Supertax! State-Lead Remedial Project Management
Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations & Feasibility Studies Under CERCLA -
Interim Final
Getting Ready Scoping The RIFS
The ReMdlal Investigation Site Characterization & TreatablHty Studies
The Feasibility Study: Development & Screening of Remedial Action Alternatives
The Feasibility Study: Detailed Analysis of Remedial Action Alternatives
Interim Final Guidance on Preparing Superfund Decision Documents: The Proposed Plan. The
Record of Decision. Explanation of Significant Differences. The Record of Decision
Guide to Developing Superfund No Action. Interim Action, and Contingency Remedy RODs
Guide to Addressing Pre-ROD and Post-ROO Changes
Guidance Document for Providing Alternate Water Supplies
RIFS Improvements Follow-up
RI/FS Improvements Phase II. Streamlining Recommendations
Result of FY 88 Record of Decision Analysis
FY 90 Regional Coordination Plan and Themes for the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility
Study and Selection of Renedy Process
Result of FY 89 Record of Decision Analysis Superfund Management Review Implementation
Product - Recommendation I 25A
Conducting Remedial Investigations/Feasibility Studies for CERCLA Municipal Landfill Sites
Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Municipal Landfill Sites
Compendium of ROD Language for FY 93 Focus Areas
Revisions to OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines & Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis
Guidance on Remedial Actions for Superfund Sites w/PCB Contamination
Interim Guidance on Establishing Soil Lead Cleanup Levels at Superfund Sites
Update on OSMER (Directive 19355.4-02. Sept. 1989) Soil lead Cleanup Guidance
Supplement to Interim Guidance on Establishing Soil Lead Cleanup Levels at Superfund Sites
Considerations 1n Ground Water Remediation at Superfund Sites
Estimating Potential for Occurrence of ONAPL at Superfund Sites
Revised Interim Soil Lead Guidance for CERCLA Sites and RCRA Corrective Action Facilities
-------
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) - ELIMIHATED
18
9355.4-13
f93SS.4-lfl
9355.4-14F5.
^9355.4-23
'. s-oi
3
)
'
r 9355.5-01)
9355.5-OlFS
9355.5-03FS
9355.5-05FS
9355.5-07FS
,.
9355.7
9355.7-01
9355.7-02
9355.7-02A
9355.7-03
9355.7-03A
DATE TITLE
09/01/93 Evaluation of the Likelihood of ONAPL Presence at NPL Sites - National Results. Final
Report
09/01/93 Draft Soil Screening Level Guidance
12/01/94 Soil Screening Guidance
07/01/96 Soil Screening Guidance: Fact Sheet
07/14/94 Guidance on Residential Lead-Based Paint. Lead-Contaminated Oust, and Lead-Contaminated
Soil
Draft Soil Screening Guidance: Issues Document
11/01/94 Technical Background Document for Soil Screening Guidance
05/01/96 Soil Screening Guidance: Technical Background Document
04/01/96 Soil Screening Guidance: User's Guide
02/01/90 Intern Final Guidance on EPA Oversight of RD/RA Performed by PRPs (Pre-Publlcatlon
Version)
04/01/90 Interim Final Guidance on EPA Oversight of RO/RA Performed by PRPs
09/01/69 ARCS Construction Contract Modification Procedures
06/04/90 Guidance on Expediting Remedial Design and Remedial Action
10/01/89 Expediting Remedial Construction
05/01/90 Value Engineering
12/01/89 USAGE Preplaced and Rapid Response Contracts
02/01/90 Real Estate Acquisition Procedures for USACE Projects
05/30/90 EPA/USACE Payment Process. Direct Cite/Revised Reimbursement Methods
02/01/90 EPA Oversight of RO/RA Performed by PRPs
03/01/90 Scoping the Remedial Design
12/01/93 ROD Annual Report: FY/92 (11/19/93)
11/05/85 Data Quality Objectives for the RI/FS Process
01/02/91 FY'91 Implementation Themes & Regional Coordination Plan for'Superfund's Remedial &
Enforcement Programs '
05/23/91 Structure and Components of Five-Year Reviews
07/26/94 Supplemental Five Year Reviews Guidance
02/19/92 Permits and Permit 'Equivalency Processes for CERCLA On-site Response Actions
05/01/95 Estimated OSN Costs for Rods: Historical Trends and Projected Costs Through FY 2MQ
-------
DIRfCTTVF *
9355.7-Q3A
|.7-04^
9360.0-02B
9360.0-038
9360.0-05
9360.0-06
9360.0-06
9360.0-08
9360.0-10 <*)
9360.0-12
9360.0-12A
9360.0-13 (*)
9360.0-14
9360.0-15 (*)
9360.0-16A
9360.0-18
9360.0-19
9360.0
9360.0
9360.0
9360.0
9360.0
9360.0
9360.0
9360
9360
9360
9360.2
20
23BFS
29FSA
32
32FS
34
•36FS
•37FS
-01
-01
-02
REGION 5 • OSHER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: <*) - ELIMINATED
<
TITLE
19
DUE
12/21/95 Second Supplemental Five-Year Review Guidance
06/23/95 Land Use 1n the CERCLA Renedy Selection Process
09/01/93 Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund - Interim Final Guidance
04/01/88 Removal Cost Management Manual
02/01/88 Superfund Removal Procedures. Revision No. Three
01/06/85 User's Guide for Removal Cost Management Software
11/27/85 Draft - Relationship of the Removal ft Remedial Programs under the Revised NCP
03/17/86 Relationship of the Removal ft Remedial Programs under the Revised NCP
01/23/86 CERCLA Removal Actions at Methane Release Sites
07/08/86 Expedited Response Actions
04/06/87 Guidance on Implementation of the Revised Statutory Limits on Removal Actions
06/12/89 Final Guidance on Implementation of the 'Consistency* Exemption to the Statutory Limits on
Removal Actions
04/06/87 Guidance on Implementation of the "Contribute to Remedial Performance' Provision '
02/07/87 Use of Expanded Removal Authority to Address NPL and Proposed NPL Sites
04/21/87 The Role of Expedited Response Action Under SARA
07/26/88 Guidance for Conducting Federal-Lead Underground Storage Tank Corrective Action
03/31/88 Removal Program Priorities
• 03/03/89 Guidance on Hon-NPL Removal Actions Involving Nationally Significant of Precedent-Setting
Issues
02/17/89 Required Use of the Removal Cost Management System for All Removal Actions
08/01/95 ERNS and CERCLA - Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS)
03/01/95 An Overview of Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS)
08/06/93 Transmlttal of Guidance on Conducting Non-T1me-Cr1t1ca1 Removal Actions Under CERCLA
12/01/93 Conducting Non-Time-Critical Removal Actions Under CERCLA
08/19/93 Determination of Imminent and Substantial Endangerment for Removal Actions
03/01/95 ERNS and Site Searches
03/01/95 ERNS Statistics
10/06/87 Interim Final Guidance on Removal Action Levels at Contaminated Drinking Water Sites
07/18/88 Model Program for Removal Site Management
12/03/90 Policy on Management of Post-Removal Site Control
-------
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) • ELIMINATED
20
DIRECTIVE i
9360.2-04
9360.2-04A
9360.3-01
9360.3-01
9360.3-01FS
9360.3-02
9360.3-02FS
9360.3-03
9360.3-05
9360.3-06
9360.3-06FS
9360.3-12
9360.3-14FS
9360.3-15FS
9360.4-01
9360.4-02
9360.4-03
9360.4-06
9360.4-07
9360.4-08
9360.4-10
9360.4-12
9360.5-00
9360.7-01
9360.7-02
9360.7-14
9360.8-10
DATE
02/24/92 Authorization for Regional Administrators to Approve Consistency Exemptions at NPL Sites
06/03/92 Clarification of Delegation to Approve Consistency Exemptions at NPL Sites
09/26/90 Trarumlttal of Advance Copy of Action Memorandum Guidance
12/01/90 Superfund Removal Procedures Action Memorandum Guidance
12/01/90 A Guide to Developing Action Memorandums
09/01/91 Superfund Removal Procedures: Guidance on the Consideration of ARAs During Removal Actions
04/01/92 Consideration of ARARs During Removal Actions
06/01/94 Sdperfund Removal Procedures Removal Response Reporting: POLREPs and OSC Reports
07/01/92 Superfund Removal Procedures Public Participation Guidance for On-Scene Coordinators:
Comnunlty Relations and the Administrative Record
04/01/92 Superfund Removal Procedures Removal Enforcement Guidance for On-Scene Coordinators
07/01/92 A Guide to Removal Enforcement
08/12/93 Response Actions at Sites with Contamination Inside Buildings
06/01/94 Removal Response Reporting: OSC Reports
06/01/94 Removal Response Reporting: POLREPS
06/13/90 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Guidance for Removal Activities
01/01/91 Compendium of ERT Soil Sampling & Surface Geophysics Procedures. Interim Final
01/01/91 Compendium of ERT Surface Water & Sediment Sampling Procedures. Interim Final
01/01/91 Compendium of ERT Groundwater Sampling Procedures. Interim Final
01/01/91 Compendium of ERT Waste Sampling Procedures. Interim Final
01/01/91 Compendium of ERT Toxlclty Testing Procedures. Interim Final
04/03/92 Removal Program's Representative Sampling Guidance Document: Volume 1 — Soil
02/04/12 CERCLA Reporting Requirements for Releases of Ethylene Glycol from Airplane De-Icing
Operations
.06/02/69 Proposed Guidelines for the Cleanup of Clandestine Drug Laboratories
10/25/90 Reporting Requirements for Continuous Releases of Hazardous Substances: A Guide for
Facilities and Vessels on Cowpl lance
10/25/90 Continuous Release- Emergency Response Notification System: Users Manual for Industry
01/01/95 Questions & Answers on Release Notification Requirements and Reportable Quantity.
Adjustments
06/15/93 Interim Guidance for the Determination of Significant and Substantial Harm Facilities for
-------
DIRECTIVE *
9370.0-1
9375.0-01
9375.1-06
9375.1-08
9375.1-09
9375.1-2A-6
9375.1-4
9375.1-4-9
9375.1-4-10
9375.1-4-c
9375.1-4-C
9375.1-4-f
9375.1-4-h
9375.1-4-k
9375.1-4-1
9375.1-4-n
9375.1-4-p
9375.1-4-T
REGION 5 • OSWER DIREaiVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 21
NOTE: (*) • ELIMINATED
'DATE TITLE
Oil Pollution Act Response Plans
08/15/86 Preliminary FY 87 SPMS Targets
05/06/89 Interim Final Guidance on Preparation of Superfund Memoranda of Agreement (SMQAs)
07/12/87 Cooperative Agreements with Political Subdivisions for Remedial Response
06/22/87 Role of EPA Personnel 1n the State Contractor Selection Process Under a Cooperative
Agreement
07/21/87 Interim Guidance on State Participation 1n Pre-Remedlal and Remedial Response
12/16/85 Audits of Superfund Response Agreements: Proposed Addenda to State Participation in the
Superfund Remedial Program Manual
02/01/84 State Participation 1n the Superfund Remedial Program
03/20/86 STATE PARTICIPATION IN THE SUPERFUND PROGRAM MANUAL Chapter IX. Audits of Superfund
Cooperative Agreements
12/17/66 STATE PAftllCIPATION IN THE SUPERFUND PROGRAM MANUAL Chapter X. Closeout of Superfund
Remedial Response Agreements
05/02/86 STATE PARTICIPATION IN THE SUPERFUND PROGRAM MANUAL Appendix C - Documenting State CERCU
Credits & Advance Match
12/31/86 STATE PARTICIPATION IN THE SUPERFUND PROGRAM MANUAL Volume 1:
Appendix C - Documenting State CERCLA Credits & Advance Match
01/05/87 STATE PARTICIPATION IN THE SUPERFUND PROGRAM MANUAL Volume 1:
Appendix F • Sample Cooperative Agreement Provisions
10/20/86 STATE PARTICIPATION IN THE SUPERFUND PROGRAM MANUAL Volume 1:
Appendix H - Sample Articles for Superfund State Contracts
03/24/86 STATE PARTICIPATION IN THE SUPERFUND PROGRAM MANUAL Volume 1:
Appendix H - Community Relations Plan Format and Sample Plan
02/07/86 STATE PARTICIPATION IN THE SUPERFUND PROGRAM MANUAL Volume 1:
Appendix L - State Lead Quality Assurance Project Plan Guidance
08/22/66 STATE PARTICIPATION IN THE SUPERFUND PROGRAM MANUAL Volume 1:
Appendix N - How to Obligate CERCLA Funds for State & Federal-Lead Response
03/06/86 STATE PARTICIPATION IN THE SUPERFUND PROGRAM MANUAL Volume 1:
Appendix P - Superfund Supplemental Guidance
11/21/86 STATE PARTICIPATION IN THE SUPERFUND PROGRAM MANUAL Volume 1:
-------
DIRECTIVE i
9375.1-4-U
9375.1-4-W (*)
9375.1-5
9375.1-6
9375.1-11
9375.1-12
9375.1-13
9375.2-01
9375.2-03
9375.2-04
9375.5-01
9375.5-02
9375.5-02A
1,375.5-03 .
9375.5-03FS
9375.5-04
9375.6-08A
9375.6-11
9375.6-11A
9375.7-01
9375.7-02
9380.0-05
9380.0-06
9380.0-08
9380.0-3
9380.0-13
RttilON 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
TITLE
22
DATE
Appendix T - Obtaining and Disposing of Equipment Under a CERCLA Cooperative Agreement
09/11/86 STATE PARTICIPATION IN THE SUPERFUND PROGRAM MANUAL Volume 1:
Appendix U - Cost Documentation Requirements for Cooperative Agreements
09/29/86 CERCLA Funding of State-lead Removals
Q3/10/86 STATE PARTICIPATION IN THE SUPERFUND PROGRAM MANUAL Volume II:
State Procurement Under Superfund Remedial Cooperative Agreements
10/07/86 Draft Guidance for Cooperative Agreements with Political Subdivisions
06/01/88 Guidance: Procurement Under Superfund Remedial Cooperative Agreements
04/27/88 State Access to EPA Contractors During Remedial Response
09/27/88 Clarification on Alienability of Management Assistance to States for ERAs and Removals
12/18/87 Final Guidance on State Core Program Funding Cooperative Agreements
08/02/88 Funding for State Core Program Cooperative Agreement State-Specific Additional Functions
07/19/89 Core Program Cooperative Agreements and Sma11/01sadvantaged Business Utilization In the
Superfund Program]
03/10/89 40 CFR Part 35 Subpart 0, Cooperative Agreements and Superfund State Contracts for
Superfund Response Actions
10/18/89 Interim Final Guidance on Indian Involvement In the Superfund Program
11/28/89 Revised Interim Final Guidance on Indian Involvement In the Superfund Program
05/01/89 Political Subdivision-Lead for Remedial Response
04/01/90 Political Subdivision Involvement In Superfund
02/12/90 Involvement of Superfund Program Managers In Superfund Response Agreement Audits
09/01/90 An Analysis of State Superfund Program: 50-State Study. 1990 Update
05/03/95 Guidance on Deferral of NPL Listing Determinations While States Oversee Response Actions
05/03/95 Response to Comments on the 1988 Proposed NCP Deferral Policy Concept
03/29/93 Ensuring the Adequacy of Cost Share Provisions in Superfund State Contracts
08/05/93 Obligation of Funds Under Superfund State Contracts
11/01/85 Leachate Plume Management
07/17/86 Guidance Document for Cleanup of Surface Impoundment Sites
09/01/88 Field Screening Method Catalog (USER'S GUIDE)
05/28/95 Guidance Document for Cleanup of Surface Tank & Drum Sites
09/01/85 Covers for Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites
-------
DIRECTIVE *
9380.0-16
9380.0-17
9380.0-17FS
93*0.0-19
9380.0-25
9380.0-46
9380.1-02
9380.1-03FS
9380.1-04
9380:1-06
9380.1-1
9380.1-13
9380.1-14
9380.2-02
9380.2-06
9380.2-3
9380.3-01
9380.3-02
9380.3-02FS
9380.3-03
9380.3-03
9380.3-04
9380.06FS
9380.3-38
9380.4-01
(9380.5-01A7
"9380.5-01B)
REGION 5 - OSUER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 23
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
»
DATE TITLE
09/01/89 Foroni on Innovative Hazardous Waste Treatment Technologies: "Technical Papers'
Domestic & InL'l (6/19-21/89). Atlanta. GA
06/10/91 Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment Technologies In OSUER Programs
08/10/91 Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment Technologies In OSUER Programs
01/01/91 Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-Annual Status Report (No. 1)
04/29/96 Initiatives to Promote Innovative Technology 1n Waste Management Programs
07/01/89 Terra Vac In S1tu Vacuum Extraction System Applications Analysis Report
10/01/87 Hazardous Waste Bibliography
07/01/90 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program - Site Program FS
08/01/90 CF Systems Organ1cs Extraction Process - Applications Analysis Report. New Bedford Harbor.
MA
05/01/91 Synopses of Federal Demonstrations of Innovative Site Remediation Technologies
09/16/86 Superfund Technology Transfer Program. Draft
06/01/91 Survey of Materials-Handling Technologies Used at Hazardous Waste Sites
11/01/90 Technical Support Services for Superfund Remediation. 2nd Edition
07/01/87 SUPERFUND INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY EVALUATION (SITE) Operations Plan
03/22/88 SUPERFUND INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY EVALUATION (SITE) Program Requirements
12/01/86 SUPERFUND INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY EVALUATION (SITE) Strategy and Program Plan
07/12/89 Treatablllty Studies Contractor Work Assignments
12/28/89 Treatablllty Studies Under CERCLA
12/01/89 Tredtablllty Studies Under CERCLA
12/28/89 Inventory of Treatablllty Study Vendors
03/01/90 Inventory of Treatablllty Study Vendors: Vol. II
11/30/89 Analysis of Treatablllty Data for boll & Debris: Evaluation of Lan Ban Impact on the Use
of Superfund Treatment Technologies
11/01/91 A Guide to Principal Threat & Low Level Threat Wastes
05/01/89 Hazcon Solidification Process - Applications Analysis Report. Douglassvllle. PA
03/12/90 Use of ORD's B1oremed1at1on Expertise 1n Superfund Removal Programs
07/01/89 AIR/SF NAT'L TECHNICAL GUIDANCE STUDY SERIES: Vol. I.-Application of Air Pathway Analyses
* for Superfund Activities" - Interim Final
00/01/90 AIR/SF NAT'L TECHNICAL GUIDANCE STUDY SERIES: Vol. II. "Estimation of Baseline Mr
-------
DIRECTIVE *
J380.S-01C,
1*9380.5-010;
9380.5-04
f9380.5-053
9380.5-13
9380.6-01
9380.6-01A
9380.6-018
9380.6-01C
9380.6-010
9380.6-01E
9380.6-01F
9380.6-01G
9380.6-01H
9380.7-01
9380.7-02A
.7-02BJ
^380.7-02C
r9380.7-03A)
01/01/89
07/01/89
05/01/90
07/01/90
11/01/89
09/01/89
05/01/90
03/01/90
09/20/90
09/20/90
09/20/90
09/20/90
09/20/90
09/20/90
05/01/90
05/01/91
05/01/91
03/01/90
03/01/89
03/01/91
03/01/91
04/01/91
REGION 5 • OSMER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 24
NOTE: (*) • aiHINATEO
TITLf
Emissions at Superfund Sites' - Revised Edition
AIR/SF NAT'L TECHNICAL GUIDANCE STUDY SERIES: Vol. III. "Estimation of Air Emissions from
Cleanup Activities at Superfund Sites' - Interim Final
AIR/SF NAT'L TECHNICAL GUIDANCE STUDY SERIES: 121. IV. 'Procedures for Dispersion Modeling
ft Air Honltorlng for Superfund Air Pathway Analysis' - Interim Final
Air Stripper Design Manual
AIR/SF NAT'L TECHNICAL GUIDANCE STUDY SERIES: Development of Example Procedures for
Evaluating the A1r Impacts of Soil Excavation Associated w/ Superfund Remedial Actions
Area Source Dispersion Algorithms for Emission Source at Superfund ^Sltes
Soil Vapor Extraction VOC Control Technology Assessment.
User's Guide for the Fugitive Dust Model
Comparisons of Air Stripper Simulations ft Field Performance Data
Transmlttal of Solvent Extraction Engineering Bulletin
Engineering Bulletin: Solvent Extraction Treatment
Engineering Bulletin: Mobile/Transportable Incineration Treatment
Engineering Bulletin: Chemical Dehalogenatlon Treatment:Apeg Treatment
Engineering Bulletin: Slurry Blodegradatlon ,
Engineering Bulletin: Soil Washing Treatment
Engineering Bulletin: In Situ Steam Extraction Treatment
Engineering Bulletin: In Situ Soil Vapor Extraction Treatment
Engineering Bulletin: Thermal Desorptlon Treatment
Basics of Pump-and-Treat.. Groundwater Remediation Technology
Superfund Ground Water Issue - Ground Water Sampling of Metals Analyses
SuperTund Ground Water Issue - Characterizing Soils for Hazardous Waste Site Assessments
Superfund Ground Water Issue - Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquids
Superfund Engineering Issue: Treatment of Lead-Contaminated Soils
9410.00-1
* * * RCRA (OSW) * * *
02/01/8S Draft Guidance on Implementation of Minimum Technology Requirements and Corrective Action
-------
REGION 5 • QSMER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) • ELIMINATED
25
DIRECTIVE
9410.00-2
9420.00-01
9420.00-03
9420.00-04
9420.00-05
9420.00-07
9420.00-08
9420.00-09
9420.00-09*
9420.00-10
9431.01(84)
9432.00-01
9432.00-1
9432.00-2
9432,01(80)
9432.01(81)
9432.UK83)
9432.01(84)
9432.01(85)
9432.02(81)
9432.02(83)
9432.03(B4i
9432.07(84)
9433.00-01
9433.00-2A
9433.00-3
DATE TITLE
Requirements of the Hazardous and Solid Haste Amendments of 1984
06/01/86 EPA Guide for Infectious Waste Management
OS/19/86 FY'87 RCRA Implementation Plan
10/16/85 FY'86 PA/SI Strategy - Addendum to the FY'86 RIP
03/31/67 FY'88 RCRA Implementation Plan
04/05/88 FY'89 RCRA Implementation Plan
05/06/91 FY'92 RCRA Implementation Plan
04/27/92 FY'93 RCRA Implementation Plan
04/02/93 FY'94 RCRA Implementation Plan .
04/02/93 FY'94 RCRA Implementation Plan Addendum
05/19/94 FY'95 RCRA Implementation Plan Addendum
09/10/84 Permit Policy Question and Answer Quarterly Report
02/11/86 Totally Enclosed Treatment Facilities Exemption for Bag House Sludge
02/01/88 Totally Enclosed Treatment System Proposal TDJ Group. Inc.
03/02/87 Joint EPA/NRC Guidance on the Definition & Identification of Commercial Mixed Lowel-Level
Radioactive and Hazardous Waste
12/30/80 RCRA Regulation of Aerosol Cans
06/28/81 Definition of "Liquid Waste"
02/18/83 Regulatory Clarification of Totally Enclosed Treatment Facility
01/27/84 Determination of Operator at the DOE Oak Ridge Facility
06/26/85 Definition of Treatment
07/27/81 Totally Enclosed Treatment Facilities
11/29/83 Recent Court Decisions on RCRA Applicability to Storage Facilities
02/02/84 Regulation of Hazardous Aqueous Waste at Wastewater treatment Facilities
04/26/84 Permit Policy for Decanting & Crushing Operations '
08/30/8r, Certification of "Existing Units' Under HSWA
11/06/84 Definition of Treatment as Defined 1n 40 CFR $260.10 Subpart B - Definition
12/24/84 Guidance on Implementation of Wastewater Treatment Unit Exemption
04/16/86 RCRA S3001(f)(2)(8) and States Exclusion of Wastes from Regulation as Hazardous
04/30/86 Determination of Regulatory Status-Light Bulbs
08/11/82 Concurrence on Responses to Pennsylvania Der Del1sting Activities
-------
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 19%)
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
DIRECTIVE *
9433.01(63)
9433.01(84)
9433.02(64)
9433.02(65)
9433.03(84)
9433.05(84)
9433.06(84)
9433,07(84)
9434.00-6
9435.00-1
LOO-1
9441.
9441.01(82)
9441.01(84)
9441.01(85)
9441.01(91)
9441.02(80)
9441.02(81)
9441.02(83)
9441.02(85)
9441.03(80)
9441.03(81)
9441.03(83)
9441.03(84)
9441.03(85)
9441.04(80)
9441.04(81)
PATE ' TITLE
11/14/83 Withdrawal of a Facility's Del1sting Petition
02/08/84 Changes Regarding the Dell sting Review Procedures
08/08/84 Response to Questions from State Pesticide Personnel Deregulating Decontaminated Water
05/16/85 RORA RSI |4: Effect of HSWA on State Dellstlng Opinions
10/23/84 Dellstlng of Spent Pickle Liquor Generated from the Porcelain Enamel Industry
12/11/84 Test Methods & Standards to Evaluate Cyanide Level In Inorganic Wastes
12/16/84 Issues Regarding a Dellstlng Petition
12/21/84 Information Required for Review of Dellstlng Petitions
12/10/80 Effect of EPAs NOU with the DOT on Activities In States with Cooperative Agreements (PIG-
81-9)
11/03/67 Procedures for Developing Regulations ft Guidance Documents
01/07/87 Guidance on the Definition & Identification of Radioactive Mixed Wastes
03/01/66 Guidance Manual on the RCRA Regulation of Recycled Hazardous Waste
05/30/80 Hazardous Waste Regulation of Empty Drum for Reuse & Reconditioning
01/13/81 Interpretation of the fossil Fuel Conbustlon Waste Exclusion In S261.4(b)(4)
07/07/62 Interpretation of the Fanner Fx<»mt1on Under 40 CFR f261.51
01/06/84 Determining 1f the Soils from Missouri Dloxln Sites are Hazardous
01/11/85 Impact of the RCRA Regulations on Landfill Gas Condensate
07/05/91 Applicability of the 'Mixture* Rule to Petroleum Refinery Wastewater Systems
08/19/60 Agricultural Waste Exclusion
02/18/81 EPA Regulation of Utility Waste
04/19/83 Subtitle C Exclusion of Drilling Fluids and Produced Waters
01/16/85 Exclusion of Sodium Azlde In Air Bag Canisters of Obsolete Automobile Hulks from RCRA
Regulations
09/04/80 Exemption of Certain Waste From Drilling Operations
04/06/81 Paint Wastes as Hazardous Wastes
05/26/83 Scope of Oil and Gas Waste Exemption In §3001(b)(2)(A) of RCRA: 'Iron Sponge' Process
02/16/84 Residue from a Reclamation Operation
01/23/85 Clarification of the Laboratory Waste Exclusion
11/17/80 Railroad Ties as Hazardous Wastes Under the Mixture Rule
04/10/81 Interpretation of 40 CFR $261.6(b) As It Applies to the Reuse of 'Red Water* from TNT
-------
DIRECTIVE
9441.04(83)
9441.05(80)
9441.05(81)
9441.05(83)
9441.05(84)
9441.05(85)
9441.06(81)
9441.06(84)
9441.06(85)
9441.07(84)
9441.07(85)
9441.08(83)
9441.08(84)
9441.08(85)
9441.09(84)
9441.10(84)
9441.10(85)
9441.11(85)
9441.12(84)
9441.12(85)
9441.13(85)
9441.14(85)
9441.15(84)
9441.15(85)
9441.18(85)
REGION 5 • OSHER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 27
NOTE: (*) - aiHINATED
PATE TITLE
Production
06/06/83 Disposal of Outdated Ordinance by Incineration
11/17/80 Small Quantity Generator
04/14/81 Treatment of Listed Waste
07/12/83 Exactions fro Presumption of Hazardousness
02/19/84 Listing of Residue fron the Treatment of a Listed Hazardous Haste
02/04/85 Exemption of Haste Streams Resulting fron Extraction. Beneflclatlon. or Processing of An
Ore or Mineral
06/09/81 Operation of the Nixing Rule '
04/10/8* Regulatory Status of Mixtures of Spent Solvents - F001-F005
02/13/85 Use/Reuse Provisions In the Definition of Solid Haste Rulemaklng
03/19/84 Exclusion of Household Hastes
02/13/85 Exclusion of Laboratory Hastes from Dloxln Regulation
10/21/83 Leachate Fro* a Municipal Landfill
05/03/84 Emission Control Dust/Sludge Generated fron Electric ARC Furnaces
02/22/85 Use of a Secondary Wastewater Treatment System to Remove biological Solids from an
Activated Sludge Unit
05/09/84 Status of Mining Laboratory Hastes Under 40 CFR 261.4(b)(7)
12/13/83 Triple Rinsing of Containers
05/15/84 Regulatory Status of Residue frai Stream-Stripping of Process Haste Containing Toluene
04/10/85 Perchloroethylene Residue as a Hazardous Haste
04/30/85 Generation of Oloxln Hastes from a Labs Analytical Procedures
06/04/84 Status of Supernatant Fron Line Neutralization of Spent Pickle Liquor
05/13/85 Zinc Plating (Segregated Basis) on Carbon Steel
05/15/85 Disposal of Haste Electrolyte from Rechargeable Nickel -Cadmium Batteries with a Potassium
Hydroxide Electrolyte
05/16/85 Clarification of Mining Waste Exclusion
07/31/84 Existing and Proposed Regulations Addressing RCRA's Coverage of Incinerators that Receive
Gaseous Emissions
05/20/85 Emptying Hazardous Waste from Paper Bags
05/21/85 Determination of Primary SIC Code for a Facility
-------
DIRECTtVg 4)
9441.19(84)
9441.19(85)
9441.20(84)
9441.20(85)
9441.21(85)
9441.23(85)
9441.24(84)
9441.27(84)
9441.27(85)
9441.28(85)
9441.29(84)
9441.29(85)
9441.30(84)
9441.31(84)
9441.
9441.36(84)
9441.37(84)
9441.50-01A
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 28
NOTE: (*) • ELIMINATED
PATE ' TITLE
08/15/84 Mineral Processing Residuals Generated by Combustion Units Burning Hazardous Waste Fuel
05/31/85 Empty Drums Containing Metallic Nickel or Nickel Oxide
08/16/84 Clarification of Exemptions Enacted 1n 1980 RCRA Amendments
06/05/85 Use/Reuse Exemption as Applied to Spent Pickle Liquor
06/06/85 Regulatory Status of Brass Dross Skimmings
06/27/85 Disposal Requirements of Scrap OEHP and Small Capacitors Containing OEHP
09/06/84. Oe11st1ng of Waste Generated from Zinc Phosphatlng on Carbon Steel - F006 (Wastewater
Treatment Sludges from Electroplating Operations)
06/27/85 Clarification of Recycling Under Revised Solid Waste Rules
09/10/84 Definition of "Empty Container"
07/01/85 Scope of the Term "Abandoned- under Revised 40 CFR 261.2
09/11/84 Definition of "Empty Container" Removal Methods
07/05/85 D1ox1n-Conta1n1ng Laboratory Waste
09/20/84 Regulatory Status of Dlbutyltm D1fluoride
07/16/85 Status of Spent Pickle Liquor Used In Production of Ferric Chloride '
07/16/85 Regulatory Status of Creosote Treated Cross Ties
09/24/84 Zinc Plating (Waste Streams)
08/23/85 Applicability of "Mixture" and "Derived From" Rules to Petroleum Refinery Wastewater
Systems
10/22/84 Contamination of Used 011 Through Normal Use of Through Purposeful Mixing With Hazardous
Wastes
10/25/84 Clarification of Federal Register Notice Pertaining to Lime-Stabilized Waste Pickle Liquor
Sludge (LSWPLS) from the Iron and Steel Industry (6/5/84)
11/07/64 Clarification of fiCRA Regulations on Hazardous Characteristic
11/28/84 Empty Container Rule
12/07/84 Regulations Applicable to Oil/Water Emulsions Generated by Refinery Wastewater Systems
12/17/84 RCRA Implications of Treating Gases Vented from Compressed Cylinders
11/14/84 Clarification of'Policy on Hazardous waste Derived from Mixture of Leachate &
Precipitation Run-off at landfills. Waste Piles and Land treatment Units
11/20/86 RCRA Exclusions under S3001(b)(2)(A) of RCRA as Applied to Hydrogen (H£) Sulflde Scrubber
Wastes from Geothermal Power Plants
-------
REGION 5 • OSUER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: <*) - ELIMINATED
DIRECTIVE *
9442.01(84)
9443.00-OiA
9443.00-02A
9443.01(80)
9443.01(81)
9443.01(83)
9443.01(84)
9443.01(85)
9443.02(80)
9443.02(84)
9443.02(85)
9443.03(80)
9443.03(84)
9443.03(85)
9443.04(83)
9443.04(85)
9443.05(83)
9443.05(84)
9443.05(85)
9443.06(85)
9443.07(85)
9443.08(84)
9443.09(84)
9443.10(84)
9443.11(84)
9444.01(80)
9444.01(81)
9444.01(82)
9444.01(83)
DATE TITLE
02/07/84 Listing of Spent Iron Sponge as a Hazardous Waste
04/21/86 Evaluating the Ignltablllty of Physical Solids
04/30/86 Determination of Regulatory Status-Light Bulbs
09/15/80 Corroslvlty as It Applies to Solid Haste
06/17/81 Sufficient Agitation for the Extraction Procedure Toxlclty Test
01/10/89 Definition of Ignltable Solids
03/01/84 LlthlMHSulfur Dioxide Battery. RIL
02/21/85 HanageKnt of Excavated Construction Soil Containing Quantities of Volatile Organic
Compounds
09/16780 The hpact of Hazardous Waste Regulations on Food Processors
03/07/84 Regulatory Status of Spent and/or Discarded LltMua-Sulfur Dioxide (LI/SO,) Batteries
02/26/85 Clarification of the Definition of the Characteristic of Ignltablllty for Hazardous Wastes^
12/22/80 Hazardousness of Paint Residues on Conveyor Hooks
06/04/84 Listing of Agents GB. VX. and HX
04/22/85 Reactivity Test Methods
07/05/83 Regulation of Phosphate Wastes, and Gas Processing Industry Wastes
07/16/85 Clarification of the Sulflde Reactivity Characteristics
07/27/83 Hazardous Waste Identification Regulations as They Apply to Waste Batteries and Cells
09/11/84 Blasting Caps as Reactive Wastes
07/22/85 Regulation Interpretation for Pesticide Applicator Washing Rinse Water
07/31/85 Notes on RCRA Methods and QA Activities
09/18/85 Remit Requirements Applicable to a Water/Nethanol Mixture
11/23/84 Designation for Waste Ink and Solvent Mixtures Generated from Printing Facilities
11/29/84 Hazardous Waste Identification: Three Questions
11/30/84 Classification of Snail Ams Ammltlon with Respect to Reactivity
12/03/84 Evaluation of EP Toxldty on the Basis of Total Chromium,
09/04/80 Interpretations of $261.33
03/12/81 Manufacturing Wastes Containing 261.33 Compounds
09/15/82 Regulation of Paint Filters
06/10/63 Interpretation of RCRA Hazardous Waste Regulations as Pertaining to Spent Solvent Listings
-------
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
30
DIRECTIVE f
9444.01(84)
9444.02(60)
9444.02(81)
9444.02(83)
9444.02(85)
9444.03(80)
9444.03(81)
9444.03(83)
9444.03(84)
9444.03(85)
9444.04(81)
9444.04(84)
9444.04(85)
9444.05(80)
9444.05(81)
9444.05(85)
9444.06(80)
9444.07(84)
9444.07(85)
9444.08(84)
9444.08(85)
9444.09(84)
9444.09(85)
9444.10(84)
DATE TITLE
and the Status of Leachate Fran Sanitary Landfills that have Received Hazardous Waste
03/05/84 Clarification of the Listings for Metal Heat Treating Wastes F010. FOIL and F012
11/13/80 Wastewater fran Refineries
05/19/81 Hazardous Waste Listing P120
07/11/83 Scope of the Listing K061. Emission Control Dust/Sludge from the Primary Production of
Steel 1n Electric Furnaces
03/04/85 Applicability of the RCRA 01oxln Listings Published 1n the Federal Register on 1/14/85. to
Wastes from Wood Preserving Processes Using Pentachlorophenol
11/17/80 RCRA Regulation of Wastes from Storage of Petroleum Products
06/06/81 Clarification of Hazardous Waste Listing K052
07/20/83 Hazardous wastes from Solar Cell and High Tech Industries
04/10/84 Toxlclty of 2.4-D Waste
04/01/85 Identification of F Solvent Wastes
06/22/81 Freon TF Recovery Still Bottoms
04/26/84 Wastewater Treatment Sludges from Wood Preserving Processes Using Creosote and/or
Pentachlorophenol
04/10/85 Guidance on the Management of Dloxln Wastes
11/18/80 Asbestos as a Hazardous Waste
09/16/81 Pesticides Containing A 1261.33(e) Compound
05/14/85 Discarded Commercial Chemical Products
12/02/80 Application of K061 Hazardous Waste Listing to Steel Foundries
05/30/84 Ballast Fluid Classification
05/17/85 Exclusion from RCRA Requirements of Used Embalming Fluids
06/06/84 Clarification of RCRA Hazardous Waste Identification Regulation as They Apply to
Deodorants for Portable Toilets
05/24/85 Wastes Containing Unreacted Materials are not Listed Spent Solvents
06/13/84 Z1nc Plating (Segregated Basis) on Carbon Steel
06/03/85 Toluene-Laden Filter Residue Generated from an Ink Production Process
07/25/84 Regulation of Wastewater Treatment Effluent from Processes that Generate K001 ft F006
Wastewater Treatment Sludge
-------
REGION 5 • OSUER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) • aiMIMATED
31
DIRECTIVE *
9444.10(85)
9444.11(84)
9444.11(85)
9444.12(84)
9444.13(84)
9444.13(85)
9444.14(84)
9444.14(85)
9444.15(84)
9444.15(85)
9444.16(85)
9444.18(84)
9445.01(84)
9445.01(85)
9445.02(84)
9445.02(85)
9445.03(84)
9445.03(85)
9445.04(84)
9445.04(85)
9445.05(84)
9445.05(85)
9450.00-01
9451.00-1A
9451.01(80)
9451.01(85)
06/05/85
07/27/64
06/19/85
07/30/84
07/30/84
09/03/85
07/30/84
09/10/85
08/08/84
06/24/85
09/26/85
10/04/84
04/23/84
04/05/85
04/23/84
04/23/85
05/25/84
05/31/85
11/19/84
06/01/85
12/20/84
01/18/85
04/01/86
02/05/86
11/05/80
03/01/85
Dellstlng of Process Hater Resulting fro* Incineration of 01 oxIn-Contanri nated Wastes
Clarification of K062 - Spent Pickle Liquor Listing
Status of Ion Exchange Resin frm Metal Reooval fro Electroplating Rinse
Regulatory Status of Spent Add froi Electro-polishing of Stainless Steel
Michigan Petition SbO, Listing
Application of the F006 Listing to Wastewater Treatment Sludges from Electroplating
Operations
Oragout froi EPA Hazardous Wastes No. F007 - Spent Cyanide Plating Bath Solutions from
Electroplating Operations (Except for precious Mtals electroplating spent cyanide plating
bath solutions)
Disposal of Dloxln Containing Waste Rlnsates by Deep Well Injection
Response to Questions fro State Pesticide Control Office: What 1s Distribution Criteria
for Waste with Only 1 Active Ingredient '
Regulatory Status of Nalcast 6015/Water/Wax Mixture ,
Clarification of January 14. 1985. Dloxln Ruling
Listing of Spent Cartridges Containing Perchloroethylene froi Dry Cleaning Establishments
No^es on RCRA Methods ft Quality Assurance Activities
Regulating Status of Soil Contaarinated with Toluene
Topics Relating to RCRA Methodology and Quality Assurance (QA) Activities
Notes on RCRA Methods and QA Activities
Analytical Methods for Petroltui Refining Residues and Wastes
Clarification of F019 Listing
EPA-Approved Waste Analyses Test Methods
Notes on RCRA Methods and QA Activities
RCRA Methods and Quality Assurance (QA) Activities
Analytical Methods to Determine the Presence of Creosote and Its Toxic Characteristics
Upleacntatlon Strategy for Snail Quantity Generators of 100-1000 KG/Month
Letter to Vice Admiral Peter J. Rotz concerning the Interaction between Marpol and RCRA
regulations from Marcla WllHans
Liability of a Servicing Company as a Generator of Hazardous Waste
Waste Exchange Programs
-------
9451.02(80)
9451.02(84)
9451.02(85)
9452.02(84)
9453.01(82)
9453.01(84)
9453.02(85)
9453.03(85)
9454.00-IA
9455.01(85)
9461.01(85)
9463.01(80)
9463.02(80)
9471.00-Ola
9471.03(84)
9471.05(84)
9472.00-1
9472.00-02A
9472.00-03
9472.03(83)
9474.01(84)
9476.00-01
9476.00-02
9476.00-03
REGION 5 • OSUER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 32
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
DATE TITLE
11/18/80 Multiple Generator Liability
09/04/84 Responsibility of Generator in Hazardous Waste Determinations
07/30/85 Activities that Constitute Hazardous waste Generation
10/25/84 Violation of EPA Hazardous waste Manifest Regulations by Federal Facilities
08/31/82 90-Day Accumulation of Hazardous Haste 1n Tanks
05/18/84 Applicability of EPA's Hazardous Haste Marking Requirement (262.32) to State-Regulated
Hastes
03/12/85 Exclusion from RCRA Permitting Requirements for Less Than 90-Day Accumulators of Dloxln-
Contalnlng Wastes
06/10/85 Intent of 40 CFR 262.34 on 90-Day Accumulation Time
05/23/86 Submission of Waste Minimization Information
06/25/85 Generator Responsibilities for Importation of Hazardous Waste
09/19/85 Building and Consolidating Shipments of Compatible Wastes with Different Hazardous Codes <
06/16/80 Department of Transportation Role In the Transportation of Hazardous Waste
11/26/fti Program Implementation Guidance on Issuance of Provisional EPA Identification Numbers
(PIG-81-8)
04/15/91 Assurance of Hazardous Waste Capacity Guidance to State Officials
09/06/84 Regulation of Tanks Used for Emergency Containment
11/21/84 Interim Status Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment. Storage
• and Disposal Facilities
02/01/85 Permit Writers' Guidance Manual for Hazardous Waste Land Stprage and Disposal Facilities-
'Phase I: Criteria for Location Acceptability and Existing Applicable Regulations
07/01/86 Statutory Interpretative Guidance: Criteria for Identifying Areas of Vulnerable
Hydrogeology
07/01/86 Technical Guidance Document: Construction Quality Assurance for Hazardous Waste Land
Disposal Facilities
12/13/83 Waste Analysis Requirements at Off-SUe Storage Facilities
09/10/84 Permit Policy Question and Answer Quarterly
09/01/82 Evaluating Cover Systems for Solid and Hazardous Waste
09/01/82 Closure of Hazardous Waste Surface Impoundments
05/07/82 Financial Assurance for Closure and Post-Closure Care: Requirements for Owner/Operator of
-------
MPgCTlVE *
9476.00-05
9476.00-06
9476.00-07
9476.00-08
9476.00-09
9476.00-12
9476.00-13
9476.00-14
9476.00-16
9476.00-18
9476.00-22
9476.02(83)
9476.02(85)
9476.03(85)
9476.04(83)
9476.04(84)
9476.04(85)
9476.05(83)
9476.05(84)
9477.00-04
9477.00-05
9477.00-06
9477.01(82)
REGION 5 - OSHER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 33
MOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
ME IHLE
Hazardous Waste Treatment. Storage & Disposal Facilities
01/01/87 RCRA Guidance Manual for Subpart G Closure and Post-Closure Care Standards and Subpart H
Cost Estimating Requirements
11/01/86 Final Report/Guidance Manual-.Cost Estimates for Closure & Post-Closure Plans (Subparts
G4H) Vols. I-IV
12/30/86 RCRA Policy Compendium for Subparts G and H
03/31/87 Surface Impoundment Clean Closure Guidance Manual
04/14/87 Part 265 Land Treatment Closure/Post Closure Guidance
02/02/88 Closure Requirements
02/08/88 Regulatory Interpretation of.the Closure Performance Standard
03/31/88 Ground-Water Monitoring at Clean Closing Surface Impoundment and Waste Pile Units
04/01/89 Effective Dates for Characteristic and Listed Hastes per March 19. 1987 Clean Closure
Regulation ^
05/12/89 Guidance on Demonstrating Equivalence of Part 265 Clean Closure with Part 264 Requirements
11/01/82 Liability Coverage • Requirements for Owners or Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment.
Storage, and Disposal Facilities
01/11/83 Interpretation of Closure and Post-Closure Requirements Regarding Hazardous Waste
Treatment. Storage and Disposal Facilities
08/27/85 RCRA Policies on Ground-Hater Quality at Closure
10/11/85 Permitting Units Created for Facility Closure
08/10/83 Trip Report: Region X • Closure Standards for Disposal Facilities
08/07/84 Closure Issues Related to Hood Preserving Plants
10/25/85 Applicability of Post-Closure Permitting Requirements to Non-Regulated Units
08/17/83 Definitions for Data Element Dictionary
09/18/84 Closure Activities
03/02/87 Liability Requirements for Facilities Seeking a RCRA Permit
11/23/87 Risk Retention Groups and Financial Assurance Requirements
12/29/87 Guidance for Reviewing Exclusions for Pre*Ex1st1ng Conditions in RCRA TSDF Insurance
Policies i
05/24/82 Part B Financial Responsibility information Requirements for Owners or Operators 1n States
with Only Phase I Authorization
-------
DIRECTIVE •
9477.01(83)
9477.01(84)
9477.02(84)
9477.03(82)
9477.04(84)
9935.0
9935.1
9936.0
9936.1
9936.2
9936.3
9938.0
9938.025
9938.1
9938.2A
9938.3
9938.4
9938.4-03
9938.5
9938.7
9938.9
9938.12
9938.13
REGION 5 • OSUER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) - ELIHINATED
*
TITLE
34
DUE
01/05/83 Applicability of the Subpart H Financial Responsibility Requirements
01/12/84 Closure Cost Estimates Based on Third Party Costs
01/30/84 EPA Authority to Enforce Subpart H Compllance at Facilities Located on State-Owned Land
10/08/82 Clarification of Intended Meanings In Hazardous Waste Facility Certificates of Liability
Insurance
11/20/84 Insura (SuMary of Requlrenents)
03/14/81 Interim Status Under S3005(e) of RCRA
07/31/81 S3005(e) of RCRA Operation of Hazardous Haste Facilities by Owners or Operators Who have
Failed to Achieve Interim Status
.11/29/84 Part B Penrit Applications with Insufficient Groundwater Monitoring Data
09/09/83 Guidance on Compliance Orders for failure to Submit ft Submlttal of Incomplete Part B
Remit Application
02/19/87 Final Administrative Hearing Procedures for RCRA §3008(h) Orders i
01/24/89 Enforcement of Authorized State Laws Pursuant to 40 CFR $271.19 - Formal Comments on State
Requirements Applicable to Facility Permits
04/17/86 Inspection Authority Under $3007 of RCRA
10/01/93 Revised RCRA Inspection Manual (1993 Edition)
04/01/87 Compliance Review Guidance for the Land Disposal Restrictions Rule for Solvents
04/22/88 RCRA Inspection Manual
07/13/88 RCRA Technical Case Development Guidance Document
10/06/88 inspection Manual for Hazardous Waste Storage ft Treatment Tank Systems (not releasable to
public under Exemption 7 of FOIA)
04/26/94 Waste analysis at Facilities that Generate. Treat. Store ft Dispose of Hazardous Hastes (A
Guidance Manual)
01/23/89 Enforcement Strategy for the Land Disposal Restrictions First Third Rule (not releasable
to public under Exemption 7 of FOIA)
09/28/84 RCRA Compliance/Enforcement Guidance Manual
07/01/91 Conducting RCRA Inspections at Mixed Haste Facilities
03/01/93 Toxlclty Characteristic Rule Enforcement Training Manual
12/17/93 Procedures for Recovering Costs Incurred During Implementation of RCRA Requirements of the
Federal Facility Compliance Act (FFCA) of 1992
-------
DIRECTIVE
9938.14
9939.0
9940.0
9940.1
9940.2
9940.3
9940.4
9943.3-la
9943.3
9945.1
9946.1
9950.1
9950.la
9950.2
9950.3
9951.1
9971
9972.00
9990.0
9992.0
9992.la
9992.1
9992.2
9992.3
9992.4
81.15(84)
DATE
03/14/94
05/19/86
07/28/81
09/26/84
09/21/84
06/26/87
07/06/89
12/30/86
09/16/86
10/01/86
02/08/88
09/09/86
07/01/88
12/01/86
03/30/88
12/30/86
07/25/86
02/22/94
06/22/83
01/25/88
03/24/88
05/27/88
REGION 5 • OSUER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) • ELIMINATED
<
TITLE
35
Transmlttal of Used Oil Management Inspection/Enforcement Strategy*
Guidance on RCRA Overflllng
Use of RCRA S3008(g) Independently of S3008(a)
Issuance of Administrative Orders Under S3013 of RCRA
Issuance of Final Revised Guidance on the Use of Issuance of Administrative Orders Under
f 7003 Of RCRA
Criteria for Eliminating Headquarter's Concurrence on RCRA §3008(h) Orders
Guidance on Administrative Records for RCRA I3008(h) Actions
Enforcement of the UST Interim Prohibition
Enforcement Strategy ft Procedures for the "Interim Prohibition" S9003(g) of SWDA
Guidance Concerning EPA Involvement in RCRA S7002 Citizen Suits
RCRA State Oversight Inspection Guide (not releasable to public under Exemption 7 of FOIA)
RCRA Ground-Water Monitoring Technical Enforcement Guidance Document ^
Executive Summary - RCRA Ground-Hater Monitoring Technical Enforcement Guidance Document
Final RCRA Comprehensive Ground-Water Monitoring Evaluation Guidance Document
RCRA Comprehensive Ground-water Monitoring Evaluation Document (RCRA Ground-Water
Monitoring Systems, not releasable to public under Exemption 7 of FOIA)
Transmlttal of the Final Waste 011 Interim Enforcement Guidance Document
FY'87 SPMS Targets for RCRA Enforcement
Regional Project Officers. Headquarters Zone Project Officers. Contracting Officers, and
Work Assignment Managers Roles ft Responsibilities
RCRA Regulation of Wastes Handled by DOE Facilities
Enforcement Actions Under RCRA ft CERCLA at Federal Facilities
Elevation Process for Achieving Federal Facility Compliance under RCRA
Agreement With the Department of Energy - Model Provisions for CERCLA Federal Facilities
Agreements
06/17/88 Agreement with the Department of Defense -- Model Provisions for CERCLA Federal Facilities
Agreements
08/10/89 Federal Facilities Negotiations Policy
01/09/90 Federal Facilities Hazardous waste Compliance Manual
11/20/84 Definition of Regulated Units
-------
9481.16(84)
9481.17(84)
9483.00-01
9483.00-02
9483.00-03
9483.00-04
9483.01(83)
9483.01(84)
9483.02(83)
9483.03(83)
9483.05(83)
9483.50-1A
9484.00-18
9484.00-03
9484.00-05*
9484.01(85)
9484.00-1A-K86)
9484.01(85)
9484.50-1A
9486.00-02
9486.01(81)
9486.01(85)
9487.00-01A
9487.00-02A
9487.00-03
REGION 5 • asm DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) • ELIMINATED .
TITLE
36
DATE
12/26/84 RCRA Regulatory Status of Contaminated Groundwater
12/27/84 Analytical Methods for Appendix VIII Constituents
.12/01/86 Technical Resource Document for the Storage & Treatment of Hazardous Waste 1n Tank Systems
02/01/87 Technical Resource Document for Obtaining Variances from the Secondary Containment
Requirement of Hazardous Haste Tank Systems. Vol. 2: Risk-Based Variance (EPA 530-SW-87-
0028)
10/02/87 Questions ft Answers Regarding the July 14. 1986 Hazardous Waste Tank System Regulatory
Amendments
05/19/87 Implementation Strategy for the Hazardous Waste Tank System Regulations
04/15/83 Definition of Tank and Surface Impoundment
02/23/84 Remitting of Hazardous Waste Treatment/Storage Tanks
04/20/83 Tank Shell Thickness Requirement
09/26/83 Tank Inspection Procedures
12/08/83 Waiver of Minimum Shell Thickness Requirement
. 01/07/86 Guidance Manual for Hazardous Waste Tank Standards (*
-------
DIRECTIVE •
9487.00-40
9487.00-6C
9487.00-08
9487.00-09
9487.01(81)
9487.01(83)
9487.01(84)
9487.01(85)
9487.01-01
9487.02(84)
9487.02(85)
9487.03(85)
9487.04(85)
9487.05(84)
9487.05(85)
9487.50-01A
9488.00-01A
9488.00-02
9488.00-03
9488.00-3
9488.00-04
9488.00-06
9488.00-08
9488.01(65)
9488.02(65)
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) • ELIMINATED
TITLE
37
Qftlfc
01/01/84 The Hydrologlc Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) Model. Volumes I & II
10/01/85 Construction Quality Assurance for Hazardous Waste Land Disposal Facilities
08/03/87 Joint NRC-EPA Guidance on a Conceptual Design Approach for Coonerclal Mixed Low-Level
Radioactive ft Hazardous Waste Disposal Facilities
02/10/88 Vertical Expansion at the U.S. Ecology's Trench 10. Beatty. Nevada Facility
03/12/81 Interla Status of Proposed Landfill Cells
12/05/83 Landfills & Land Disposal Standards
02/07/84 Liner Design
01/22/85 Clarification on the Disposal of Nonhazardous Liquid Uastewaters & Sludges In Sanitary
Landfills Under RCRA & HSWA
04/30/86 Restrictions on the Placement of Nonhazardous Liquids 1n Hazardous Waste Landfills
05/14/84 Conditions for a Variance from Part 264 Landfill Liner ft Leachate Collection Requirements
05/10/85 Clarification of Continued Landfill Disposal of "Lab Packs'
05/29/85 Clarification of Ban or Disposal of Liquids 1n Landfills
08/07/85 Management of Liquid Hazardous Wastes 1n Landfills
11/12/84 Existing Regulations on the Placement of Liquids 1n Landfills & Expected Requirements of
the RCRA Amendments
09/20/85 User of Absorbents for Containerized Liquid Hazardous Wastes
11/18/85 "Waiver from Double Liner Requirements Pursuant to I3015(b)(l) and 40 CFR §265.301(c)" for
CECOS International. Inc.. W1ll1amsburg. OH. Landfill Cell No. 9
05/21/86 D1ox1n Trial Burns for Purposes of Certification or a RCRA Permit
06/10/86 Permitting Incinerators
06/30/86 Acceptability of Thermal Relief Vents on Hazardous Waste Incinerators
09/01/81 Engineering Handbook for Hazardous Waste Incineration
.07/01/83 Guidance Manual for Hazardous Waste Incinerator Permits
08/01/86 Hazardous Waste Incineration Permitting Study
06/30/86 Acceptability of Thermal Relief Vents on Hazardous Waste Incinerators
01/10/85 Dilution of a Characteristic Waste as a Treatment Process to Qualify for the 5264.340
Exemption
01/14/65 Summary of EPA's Regulations Concerning Disposal of Dloxln - Contaminated Wastes by
Incineration or Landfllllng
-------
DIRECTIVE *
9488.03(85)
9488.04(85)
9488.05(85)
9488.06(85)
9488.07(85)
9488.08(85)
9488.50-01A
9489.00-02
9489.01(82)
9490.00-02
9493.00-01A
9493.01(85)
9494.00-01
9500.00-01A
9501.01(82)
9501.01(84)
9501.02(82)
9502.00-02
9502.00-03
9502.00-04
9502.00-05
9502.00-06
9502.00-06C
9502.00-060
9502.00-07
9502.01(84)
9502.01(85)
REGION 5 • OSUER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) • ELIMINATED
i
TITLE
38
DATE
04/01/85 Acceptable Levels of Residual Contaminants 1n the EPA Incinerator Residues (Revision)
05/20/85 Modification of Incinerator Permits to Burn 01ox1n Wastes
05/22/85 Effective Incineration of Infectious wastes
06/18/85 Certifying Incinerators & Thermal Treatment Units
06/26/85 tffect of Water-Stripped POHCs on Incinerator ORE
08/30/85 Regulatory Status of Drum Furnaces Burning Hazardous Waste Fuel
,11/08/85 Burning Hazardous Waste Fuels 1n Cement KILNS
04/22/88 Issues Relating to Miscellaneous Units
11/23/82 Status of 000 Munitions Deactivate on Facilities
11/14/80 Used 011 Recycling Act of 1980 (P.L. 96-463) (PIG-81-6)
07/31/86 EPA's Interpretation of the HSWA Prohibition on the Use of Hazardous Waste as a Dust
Suppressant •
07/12/85 Prohibition on Use of Hazardous Waste for Dust Suppression or Road Treatment
08/24/87 Implementation Strategy to Accompany the Proposed Rule for Burning of Hazardous Waste
Fuels
03/14/86 Guidance Document on RCRA Public Involvement
07/09/82 Guidance for Permitting of Hazardous waste Incinerators
11/09/84 RCRA Reauthorlzatlon Statutory Interpretation #1: Immediate Permit Requirements
12/29/82 RCRA Land Disposal Permit Strategy
04/16/86 RCRA Corrective Action at Federal Facilities
08/04/86 Implementation of UIC Corrective Action Requirements
08/14/86 Implementation of RCRA Facility Assessments
10/09/86 RCRA Facility Assessment Guidance
07/24/87 Definition of Solid Waste Mgmt Unit for the Purpose of Corrective Action Under S3004(u)
07/01/87 RCRA Facility Investigation (RFI) Guidance
06/16/89 RCRA Facility Investigation (RFI) Guidance Vol. 1 of IV
(EPA 530/SW-89-031. May 1989)
03/08/88 Use of Corrective Action Authorities at Closing Facilities
12/07/84 Permitting of Refinery 01 ly Wastewater Treatment Ponds
02/05/85 RCRA Heauthorlzatlon Statutory Interpretation 13: Immediate Implementation of New
Corrective Action Requirements
-------
REGION 5 • OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) • ELIMINATED
39
DIRECTIVE i
9502.02(85)
9502.05(85)
9502.05(858)
9503.01(85)
9503.02(85)
9503.50-01A
9503.51-01A
9503.52-01A
9504.01(84)
9504.02(84)
9505.00-01
9521.00-01
9521.01(84)
9521.02(84)
9521.03(84)
9522.00-01
9522.00-02
9522.00-02a
9522.00-03
9522.01(82)
9522.01(85)
9522.02(83)
9522.02(85)
9522.03(84)
9522.03(85)
9522.04(84)
9522.04(85)
9523.00-01A
9523.00-02A
DATE TITLE
06/17/85 Regulation of Wood treatment Plant Drip Areas as SWMUs
02/05/85 RSI: Guidance on Corrective Action for Continuing Releases
02/05/85 RCRA Reauthor1zat1on Statutory Interpretation #3: Immediate Implementation of New
Corrective Action Requirements
05/10/85 Definition of Mixed Waste (DOE Facilities)
08/30/85 Regulation of "Mixed Wastes" at DOE Facilities
12/23/85 RSI Memorandum for RD&D Permits
12/24/85 RD&D Permit for a Sludge Drying Process 1n a Wastewater System
01/02/86 Permit-Exempt Status of Sludge Dryers Added to Wastewater Treatment Units
08/16/84 Enforcing Groundwater Monitoring Requirements 1n RCRA Part B Permit Applications
•11/29/64 Response * and Mechanisms to Prevent GWM Deficiencies
08/19/93 RCRA Public Involvement Manual
10/03/90 RCRA Permit Appeals Guidance Manual
05/02/84 Inadequate Part B Permit Application
02/22/84 Public Participation In Permit Issuance
07/09/84 Reporting Withdrawals 1n SPMs as Final Permit Determinations
09/15/86 Effect of Land Disposal Restrictions on Permits
11/16/87 RCRA Permit Requirements for State Superfund Actions
03/09/88 RCRA Permit Requirements for State Superfund Actions
11/13/87 Region 10's Recommended Revision of 40 CFR §s 270.4(a) & 270.32(b)(l)
05/14/82 Definition of "Major" Hazardous Waste Generators. Transporters, & Facilities (PIG-82-2)
02/11/85 Signatories to Department of Defense Permit Applications
07/11/83 Revised Definition of "Major Handlers* of Hazardous Waste
04/09/85 Steam Team RCRA Permit Issuance to Facilities 1n Violation of Other Federal Laws and
Regulatory Programs
07/30/84 Issuance of RCRA Permits to Facility Owners and Operators
07/05/85 Requirements of S213 of HSWA
10/01/84 EPA Review of Draft State RCRA Permits
08/30/85 Partial Permitting
07/05/86 Permit Applicants' Guidance Manual for Exposure Information Requirements Under RCRA §3019
09/26/86 Procedural Guidance for Reviewing Exposure. Information Under RCRA §3019
-------
DIRECTVP f
9523.00-05
9523.00-10
9523.00-11
9523.00-12
9523.00.14
9523.00-15
9523.00-16
9523.00-17
9523.00-18
9523-01(62)
9523.01(64)
9523.01(85)
9523.02(84)
9523.03(63)
9523.03(85)
9523.05(83)
9523.05(64)
9523.09(64)
9523.10(64)
9523.50-01A
9524.01(82)
9524.01(84)
9524.01(85)
9524.02(84)
9525.01(82)
9527.00-01A
DUE
07/01/86
KBIOM 5 - OSWER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
"TO: (*> - ELIMINATED
IULE
40
10/01/83
12/10/86
03/30/87
. 03/14/86
03/30/88
04/19/88
09/02/68
03/14/89
10/22/82
01/17/84
02/25/85
05/24/84
06/17/fl.l
08/19/85
07/29/63
09/06/64
11/23/64
11/29/84
li/18786
02/08/62
10/05/84
08/01'j5
10/11/64
01/29/82
05/01/86
Perilt Applicant's Guidance Manual for Hazardous Haste Land Treatment. Storage and
Disposal Facilities
Penult Applicant's Guidance Manual, for the General Facility Standards of 40 CFR 264
Denial of RCRA Operating Permits
Summry of Permit Assistance Team (PAT) Comments
Sunmry of Recent Permit Assistance Team (PAT) Comments
Sumnary of Permit Assistance Team (PAT) Comments
Call-In of Storage and Treatment Applications
Summary of Assistance Branch Permitting Comments
Summary of Assistance Branch Permitting Comments
Existing Incinerators and Data 1n Lieu of Trial Burn
Estimated Closure Dates 1n Permit Applications
Required Signatures on Part 8 Permit Applications ^
Guidance on Petroleum Refinery Waste Analyses for Land Treatment Permit Applications (list
of 89 Hazardous Constituents Possibly Present In Refinery Wastes ft Column Clean Up
Procedure)
Land Owner Signature on Part A Applications
Additional Organic Parameters In Evaluation of Interim Status Groundwater Monitoring
Supplemental PAT Comments on McDonnell-Dough* Electronics Part B Applications
Groundwater Monitoring Requirements at a Site Overlying by Two Aquifers
Criteria for Using Trial Burn Information Obtained from One Incinerator to Issue a Permit
at a Second Incinerator in Lieu of Conducting a Second Trial Burn at the Second Facility
EPA Authority Under RCRA $3008 to Assess Penalties for Failure to Submit a Complete and
Adequate Part B Application
Post-Closure Part B Permit Requirements
RCRA Permits for Facilities that have Underground Tanks
Use of Compliance Schedules in RCRA Permits
Future Permitting of Incinerators Burning Non-Hazardous Waste
Permit Writer Responsibilities 1n Writing Permit conditions, the Velslcol Decision
Proposed Mechanism for Handling Mobile Treatment Units
Guidance Manual for Research. Development and Demonstration Permits Under 40 CFR §270.s&
-------
REGION 5 • OSUER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) » ELIMINATED
41
DIRECTIVE i
9527.01(82)
9527.01-84
9527.02(82)
9527.02(84)
9528.00-01
9528.01(82)
9528.02(82)
9528.50-1A
9540.00-1C
9540.00-03
9540.00-04
9540.00-05
9540.00-6
9540.00-07
9540.00-08
9540.00-09
9540.00-09A
9540.00-10
9540.50-1A
9541.00-01A
9541.00-03
9541.00-03A
9541.00-04
9541.00-6
9541.00-7
9541.00-09
9541.00-10
PATE TITLE
*
11/02/82 RCRA Permits for Mobile Treatment Units ft Multiple Sites Using the Same Type of Equipment
03/19/84 The Revised Delegation to Process "Research and Special Inc1nerat1on-at-Sea Permits"
11/02/82 EPA's Mobile Incinerator
07/20/84 Permitting Mobile Treatment Units. PAT Comments: EPA's Mobile Incinerator. Denney Farm
Site. MO
05/25/88 Interim Status Expansion to Add an Incinerator
05/28/82 Changes to Hazardous Haste Mgmt Facilities During Interim Status; Current & Proposed
Regulations
07/20/82 Facility Changes During Interim Status
11/05/85 Interpretation of 40 CFR 270.70(b)
03/31/86 Draft State Consolidated RCRA Authorization Manual
06/25/85 Guidance on RCRA State Program Reversion
06/06/85 Review of State Statutory Authorities for the HSMA Amendments
08/09/82 Status of Permits Issued Before a State Receives RCRA Phase II
07/01/85 RCRA Reauthorlzatlon and Joint Permitting 1n Authorized States:
Statutory Interpretation 15 .
0.1/15/87 Compliance Schedules for State Program Revisions
04/08/87 Capability Assessments for RCRA Authorization Program Revisions
01/21/88 State Consolidated RCRA Authorization Manual (SCRAM)
11/09/90 State Authorization Manual (SAM) Vols. I & II
01/30/92 Capability Assessment Guidance
11/06/85 Effect on State Authorization of HSMA S3006(f): Availability of Information
06/16/86 State Program Revisions for RCRA
06/10/83 RCRA State Final Authorization Guidance Manual
09/01/82 Equivalency of State Financial Responsibility Mechanisms
02/21/84 Review of State Capability 1n RCRA Final Authorization
07/30/87 State Program Advisory 12: RCRA Authorization to Regulate Mixed Waste
06/09/88 State Program Advisory (SPA) 13: RCRA Authorization. Non-HSMA Cluster III & HSMA Cluster
08/22/88 State Program Advisory 15: Revised Model Attorney General's Statement and Models G & H
Federal Register Notices for Codification
09/27/88 State Program Advisory 14: State Program Changes for Non-HSWA Cluster IV and HSWA II and
Authorization (PIG-82-5)
RCRA Reauthorlzatlon
-------
9541.00-11
9541.00-12
9541.00-13
9541.00-14
9541.00-16
9541.00-17
9541.00-18
9541.00-19
9541.00-20
9541.01(81)
9541.01(82)
9541.01(83)
9541.01(84)
9541.01(85)
9541.02(83)
9541.02(84)
9541.02(85)
9541.03(84)
9541.03(85)
9541.04(84)
9541.05(85)
9541.05(84)
9541.05(85)
9541.06(84)
9541.06(85)
9541.07(84)
REGION S • OSUER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996) 4!
NOTE: (*) • ELIMINATED
BATE TITLE
Associated Revisions to the SCRAM
07/13/89 State Program Advisory 16
09/10/90 State Program Advisory |7 (Memo to Regional Division Directors (1-10)
03/01/91 State Program Advisory f8
01/08/92 State Program Advisory 19
07/28/92 State Program Advisory 110
09/23/93 State Program Advisory 111
04/04/94 State Program Advisory 112
04/07/94 State Program Advisory 113
07/12/94 State Program Advisory 114
09/29/81 States' Role In Assigning EPA Identification Numbers (PIG-81-12)
05/17/82 EPA Enforcement of RCRA-Authorized State Hazardous Waste Laws ft Regulations (PIG-82-3)
09/08/83 State Regulation Development ft RCRA Final Re-authorization
02/21/84 State Regulation of Radioactive Waste
03/06/85 RCRA Permit Re-authorization Issues 1n Region 3
12/14/83 State Financial Regulations
03/05/84 Jurisdiction ft Implementation of the Hazardous Waste Program on Indian Lands
11/20/81 Universe of Wastes for EPA Permit Activities 1n State Authorized for Phased II or Final
Authorization (Ref. PIG-82-1)
04/16/84 Effect on Authorized State of Recent Addition of a Waste Stream to 40 CFR 261.31
03/08/85 Review of State Statutory Authorities for the Hazardous ft Solid Waste Amendments of 1984
05/21/84 Determining Whether State Hazardous Waste Requirements are Broader 1n Scope or More
Stringent than the Federal RCRA Program PIG-84-1
03/20/85 Application of 40 CFR 271.21 (e) ('Moving Target") to Recently Promulgated Regulations
06/13/84 Transfer of Federal RCRA Permits to Authorized States ft Compliance with 40 CFR 124 10(e)
05/08/85 Management of Wastes Newly Regulated Under HSWA
06/27/84 Effect of Applicability Revision on Final Authorization Requirement
05/20/85 Role of Local Governments In Operating Harardous Waste Programs
06/29/84 State Adoption of Regulations In Anticipation of Pending Federal Regulations Which would
Reduce the Stringency or Scope of the Federal Program
-------
REGION S • OSUER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
43
DIRECTIVE •
9541.08(84)
9541.08(85)
9541.09(85)
9542.00-03
9542.00-04
9542.01(80)
9542.01(81)
9542.01(82)
9542.01(83)
9542.01(85)
9542.02(80)
9542.02(81)
9542.02(82)
9542.02(84)
9542.03(80)
9542.03(81)
9542.04(80)
9542.05(80)
9543.00-02
9543.01(84)
9545.00-2
9545.00-4
9545.00-06A
DATE TITLE
» •
09/13/84 Radioactive Haste Exemption 1n North & South Carolina
08/16/85 Revisions to State Program
07/01/85 Re-authorization Statutory Interpretation • 15 RCRA Re-authorization & Joint Permitting in
Authorized States \
10/23/80 Federal Register Notice of Public Hearing & Cement Period on State Applications for
Interim Authorization (PIG-61-2)
12/01/80 Final Determinations on State Applications for Interim Authorization Action Memo & Federal
Register Notice tPIG-81-7)
10/03/80 Requirement that State-Permitted Hazardous Haste Facilities have 'Interim Status" (PIG-80-
3)
02/12/81 Involvement of States Without Phase II Interim Authorization in RCRA Permitting (PIG-81-
11)
05/25/82 State & EPA Interaction Regarding Exclusion of Waste Generated at Individual Facilities^
("Oellstlng11) (PIG-82-4)
08/02/83 Changes During Interim Status In Phase II Authorized States
01/11/85 RCRA RST112: Extensions of Interim Authorization of State Hazardous Haste Programs
10/03/80 Interim Authorization of Program Based on Emergency State Regulations (PIG-80-2)
03/24/81 Transfer of Notification & Penult Application Information to States (PIG-81-10)
07/09/82 Federal Oellstlng & RCRA Permitting In Interim Authorized States
12/17/84 Clarification of State Vs. Federal Role in Interim Authorization
10/17/80 The Use of State Permitting Systems During Phase I Interim Authorization Not Based on
Explicit Regulatory Standards (PIG-81-1)
11/20/81 Universe of Hastes for EPA Permit Activities 1n States Authorized for Phase I Only (PIG-
82-1)
10/31/80 "Del1sting" of Hastes by Authorized States (PIG-81-4)
11/14/80 State Regulation of Federal Agencies for Purpose of Interim Authorization (PIG-81-6)
12/27/84 Additional Guidance on RCRA State Capability Assessments
06/26/84 State Capability Assessment Guidance
07/01/86 RCRA Permit Quality Protocol
05/15/86 FEDTRAK Federal RCRA Regulation Tracking System
08/11/88 RCRA Program Evaluation Guide
-------
DIRECTIVE *
9551.00-01
9551.00-01A
9555.00-01
9560.01(85)
9560.02(83)
9560.02(85)
9560.03(85)
9560.05(85)
9560.10(85)
9560.12(85)
9560.14(85)
9560.15(85)
9571.00-OIA
9572.00-01
9572.00-02
9573.00-01
9574.00-01
9574.00-02
9581.01-1M86)
9595.00-1
REGION 5 • OSHER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) - ELIMINATED
«
TITLE
44
DATE
«
05/23/94 RCRA Policy Statement: Clarification of the Land Disposal Restrictions" Dilution
Prohibition ft Combustion of Inorganic Metal-Bearing Hazardous Wastes
02/26/86 Land Disposal Ban Variance Petitioner's Guidance Manual
09/28/90 Man to All NRC Licensees: Guidance on the Land Disposal Restrictions' Effects on Storage
ft Disposal of Commercial Mixed Haste
01/08/85 The Use & Nature RSIs
11/15/83 RCRA PenRlts for Superfund Sites
04/29/85 Delegation of Authority to Issue Permits
05/08/85 Joint Permitting & Compliance Schedules for Corrective Action
05/24/85 Loss of Interim Status Provisions
06/03/85 Detection of Gasoline Contamination 1n GM ft Detection of LUST
07/10/85 Clarification of Points Raised at an EPA Symposium on RCRA ft KSHA
08/05/85 Clarification of Types of Activities that May Be Used to Satisfy the Waste Minimization
Certification
09/11/85 Waste Minimization: Permit Certification ft Joint Permitting
07/29/88 Cooperative Agreement Guidance for State Mining Waste Programs
10/16/87 Implementation of HSWA Subtitle D $4005(c)(l)(A) ft S4005(c)(l)(C)
02/22/88 Letter to State Environmental Commissioners: Subtitle D State Solid Waste Management Plans
09/18/92 Exemption for Municipal Waste Combustion Ash from Hazardous Waste Regulation Under RCRA
13001(1)
11/01/88 Clarification of Issues Pertaining to Household Hazardous Waste Collection Programs
07/22/92 RCRA Subtitle C Requirements Applicable to Household Hazardous Waste Collection Programs
Collecting Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Waste
01/09/86 Guidance on Use or FY86 Additional RCRA Grant Funds
05/06/86 Facility Management Plarmlng/Multl-year Strategies
9610.1
9610.2
* * * UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS (OUST) * * *
02/10/66 When Is a Tank Considered to be Installed
04/07/d6 Clarification of the Definition of "Underground Storage Tank"
-------
REGION 5 • OSUER DIRECTIVES LIST (AUGUST 1996)
NOTE: (*) - ELININATED
45
PIPgCTlVE *
9610.3
9610.05
9610.05-01
9610.06
9610.07
9610.08
PATE
05/02/86
04/13/88
01/30/89
05/06/88
03/14/88
Revisions ft Additions to the Underground Storage Tank (UST) Notification Definitions
FY'89-rV90 Transition Strategy for the Underground Storage Tank Program
Transition Tasks List
The UST Progra* Appraisal Strategy
UST ProgrM Indian Lands Strategy for FY'88 ft FY'89 and Guidance for Regional Pilot
Project
------- |