PB86-179678
       Dissolved Oxygen and
       Oxidation-Reduction
       Potentials in Ground Water
       Illinois State Water Survey Div.,  Champaign
      Prepared  for

      Robert S.  Kerr  Environmental  Research Lab.
      Ada, OK
      Apr 86
I
1

-------
                                                  EPA/600/2-86/042
                                                  April 1986
DISSOLVED OXYGEN AND OXIDATION-REDUCTION POTENTIALS IN GROUND WATER
                                 by
                           Thomas R. Holm
                         Gregory K. George
                        Michael J. Barcelona
                    Illinois State Water Survey
                  Champaign, Illinois  61820-7407
                             CR-811477
                          Project  Officer

                          Bert  E.  Bledsoe
             Processes and Systems Research Division
         Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory
                       Mi, Oklahoma  74820
          ROBERT S.  KERR ENVIRONMENTAL  RESEARCH LABORATORY
                 OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
                U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENC?
                        ADA.  OKLAHOMA  74820

-------
                                    TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                             (Plftse read /nitrucliont on the rtvene be fort completing)
  1. REPORT NO.

   EPA/600/2-86/042
                            2.
                                                         3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
                                                            PM6179678/AS
 4. TITLE ANDSUBTITLE
     DISSOLVED OXYGEN AND OXIDATION-REDUCTION POTENTIALS
     IN  GROUND WATER
                                                           5. REPORT DATE
                                                              April 1986
                                                         «. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
   AUTHORISE
    Thomas R.  Holm,  Gregory K.  George and
       Michael J.  Barcelona
                                                         •. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO
  PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
    Illinois State Water Survey
    2204 Griffith Drive
    Champaign, Illinois  61820-7407
                                                         10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                                                                  CBPC1A
                                                         11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
                                                                 CR-811477
  2. SPONSORING AGENCr NAME AND ADDRESS
    Robert S. Kerr Environmental  Research Laboratory
    Office of Research and  Development
    U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
    Ada,  Oklahoma  74820
                                                         13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                                                          1nal (June 1984  - March  1986]
                                                         14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
                                                                 EPA/600/15
 5. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
 6. ABSTRACT
       Water samples were collected  from various depths 1n a pristine sand  and  gravel
  water table aquifer at monthly  intervals over a period of one year.  Dissolved  oxygen
  concentrations were near saturation  9 feet below tha water table and decreased  to
  nearly zero at 78 feet below the water table.   Changes 1n the Eh values were  consisten
  with  changes in the dissolved oxygen concentrations.  Hydrogen peroxide was detected
  in  nanomolar concentrations at all depths, but not on every sampling run.  Of all
  oxidation-reduction potentials calculated from substituting analytical results  Into
  the Nernst equation, only the Fe^/Fe2"1" couple in the deepest well agreed with  the
  measured  Eh within 50 millivolts.  For the 02/Ha02 and NOa'/WV  couples the  range of
  potentials calculated from one year's  data overlapped the range of measured Eh  values,
  so  there  was some agreement on the average.  However, for a given sampling run, the
  various calculated potentials spanned  several  hundred millivolts, which means that
  the activity ratios for the various  couples differed by many orders of magnitude  (I.e.
  the system was not 1n redox equilibrium).  The concentration profiles of many, solutes,
  including dissolved oxygen, suggest mixing of  shallow and deep ground waters.  The
  observed  concentration profiles were relatively constant  over the duration of the
  sampling.
                                KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
                                              b.tDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS  C. COSATI Field/Group
                                              19. SECURITY CLASS (Ttiti Report!
                                                  UNCLASSIFIED
                                                                        21. NO. OF PAGES
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

   RELEASE TO THE PUBLIC
                                             20. SECURITY CLASS (Thitpaffl
                                                  UNCLASSIFIED
                                                                      22. PRICE
EPA F*m 2220-1 (*•». 4-77)   PREVIOUS COITION i* OMOLKTK
                                             1

-------
                                DISCLAIMER
     The information  in  this  document has been  funded  wholly  or  in part by
the United States Environmental Protection Agency under Cooperative Agreement
No. CR-811A77 to Illinois State Water Survey.  Although it has been subjected
to the Agency's  peer  and administrative review  and  approved  for publication
as an EPA document, mention of trade  names  or  commercial  products  does not
constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                     ii

-------
                                     FOREWORD
       EPA Is  charged by Congress  to  protect  the Nation's land,  «lr and water
  systems.   Under a mandate of national  environmental  laws  focused on air and
  water quality,  solid waste  management  and the  control  of toxic substances,
  pesticides,  noise and  radiation, the Agency  strives  to  formulate and imple-
  ment  actions which lead  to a compatible balance between human activities and
  the abilir.y  of  natural systems  to support  and nurture life.

       The Robert  S.  Kerr  Environmental  Research Laboratory  Is  the Agency's
  center of  expertise for  investigation  of the  soil and  subsurface environ-
 ment.  Personnel  at  the Laboratory are  responsible for management of research
 programs to:  (a)  determine  the fate,  transport and transformation  rates  of
 pollutants in the  soil,  the unsaturated  zone  and  the saturated  zone  of  the
 subsurface environment; (b)  define   the  processes  to be  used in  character-
 izing the  soil   and subsurface  environment  as a  receptor  of  pollutants;
 (c) develop  techniques  for  predicting  the  effect  of pollutants on  ground
 water, soil  and  Indigenous  organisms;  and  (d) define  and  demonstrate  the
 applicability and limitations of  using  natural processes, indigenous  to  the
 soil and   subsurface environment,   for   the*  protection   of   this  resource.

     Currently,  there is  a very  limited  amount of information  and  under-
 standing of   oxygen  and   oxidation-reduction  processes  in   the  subsurface
 environment of  ground  water.   This   report is  a first attempt  at  defining
 and understanding  the  dynamic  relationships  involved  in  this  environment.
These  relationships   should  be  useful  to  olcroblologlsts, geochemists  and
engineers studying  ground-water  quality  and  the  fate  of contaminants  In
ground water*.
                                         Clinton W. Hall
                                         DltWOT
                                         Robert S. Kerr Environmental
                                            Research  Laboratory
                                     iii

-------
                                   ABSTRACT
      Water  samples  were  collected  from  various depths  in a pristine sand and
 gravel  water table aquifer at monthly  intervals  over  a period of one year.
 Dissolved oxygen  concentrations  were near saturation 9 feet below the water
 table and decreased to nearly zero at 78  feet below the water table.  Values
 of  Eh reflected  the dissolved oxygen concentrations.   Hydrogen peroxide was
 detected  in  nanoroolar  concentrations  at  all  depths,  but  not  on  every
 sampling run.   Of all oxidation-reduction  potentials  calculated  by substi-
 tuting  analytical  results into   the  Nernst  equation,  only  the  Fe3*/Fe2*
 couple  in the deepest well agreed  with  the measured Eh within 50 millivolts.
 For  the 02/H2°2  and  N03~/NHjj*  couples the range of  potentials  calculated
 from  one year's  data overlapped the range  of  measured Eh values,  so there
was some agreement  on the average.  However,  for a  given sampling run, the
 various calculated  potentials differed  by several hundred millivolts, which
means that  the  activity ratios  for the  various couples differed  by  many
orders  of magnitude (i.e. the system  was not in redox equilibrium).   The
concentration profiles of many solutes, including dissolved  oxygen, suggest
mixing  of   shallow  and  deep ground waters.   The  observed  concentration
profiles were relatively constant over the duration of the sampling.
                                     iv

-------
                                   CONTENTS

                                                                        Page
 Abstract	     iv
 Acknowledgements	     vi
 Introduction  	     1
 Conclusions   	  .........  	     3
 Recommendations 	     3
 M«i*rl«lM  and  Molhodn  	  .......... 	     D
      Well  Drilling and  Installation   	     H
      Water  Sampling	     5
      Analytical Methods	     6
           Hydrogen Peroxide  	     7
 Results and  Discussion   	     8
      Dissolved Oxygen, Trace Metals, and Eh  	     9
      Hydrogen Peroxide	    10
      Other Solutes   	    11
      Calculating Redox Potentials  	    13
References	    1l|
Appendices	   21
      A.   Oxygen Diffusion Through Sampling Tubing  	    22
      B.   Tabulation of Ground Water Analyses 	    23
Figures	    35

-------
                               ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
     The authors  thank the reviewers for  their  comments  on the manuscript,
the  Illinois  Department of Conservation  for  access to the  field  site, the
Illinois Department of Transportation for well drilling, Ms. Para Beavers for
typing the manuscript, and Ma. Lynn Weiss for drawing figures 1,  2, and 22.
                                     vl

-------
                                  IHTRODUCTION
      Because  ground water  makes up  a  significant  fraction  of  the  water
 resources of  the United States,  comprising  approximately  40J of the  water
 withdrawn for  agricultural,  municipal,  and  industrial use    [Anon.  1978],
 ground-water  quality  is  of  great  concern.    If ground-water  quality  is
 defined  in  terms  of  the  concentrations  and  properties  of   substances
 dissolved in  the water,  then  the presence  or  absence of dissolved oxygen
 affects many aspects of ground-water quality. The mobilities,  reactivities,
 and toxlclties  of many elements  may  all  depend  on  their oxidation state.
 Microblal populations  are distinctly different  in oxlc  and anoxlc waters
 and,  therefore, the rates of nicrobial degradation of  organic  compounds  are
 also quite different.   Thus,  dissolved oxygen affects both  the geochemlcal
 and microblal  processes which are  likely  to influence water quality.   In
 this  project  we  have  begun  the  chemical  characterization of  a  shallow
 aquifer with  dissolved oxygen  concentrations  ranging  from near-saturation to
 neai—anoxic,   conditions  that   are  typical   of  many  aquifers   which  are
 susceptible  to contamination.   The results of this study should,  therefore,
 be   useful   to  mlcrobiologists,   geochemlsts,  and   engineers   studying
 ground-water  quality and the fate  of contaminants  in  ground waters.

     Improper  disposal of municipal and  industrial wastes  in landfills  and
 land applications of sludges,  industrial wastes, fertilizers,  or  pesticides
 can lead to degradation of ground-water quality  through  leaching of  these
 materials   and  percolation  of  the  contaminated  leachate   into  shallow
 aquifers.     Aquifer  contamination  may  be  partially  mitigated  by  natural
 physical  processes,  but the time scale for flushing a conservative substance
 from an  aquifer  is  proportional  to the hydraulic  residence  time of  the
 ground  water,  which  can be hundreds of years  in  some aquifers.  Furthermore,
 the time required  for the flushing  of  a  hydrophobia contaminant  that   is
 strongly  sorbed by the aquifer  solids  may be much longer than the residence
 time.   Clearly, physical processes for aquifer self-purification can be very
 slow.   However, natural chemical and biological  processes  can also  contri-
 bute to aquifer self-purlfloat ion.

     The  rates of many  of  these self-purification processes  depend on the
 oxidation-reduction  (redox) atatus of  the ground-water/aqulfer system.   The
 redox status of the ground water can control the chemical speciation of many
 elements  and   can  also  Influence  microblal  ecology  and  metabolism.    Fo-
 example,  In  the pH  range  of most ground waters,  ferric hydroxide  is  much
 less soluble   than  ferrous hydroxide.    Also,   in  oxic systems  containing
hydrous  metal  oxides,  sorption processes  limit  the  solubilities of  many
 trace elements  [Jenne 1968].   For example,  arsenate,  which  is the  thermo-
dynamically favored form of arsenio In oxic waters is  more  strongly adsorbed
on  metal oxides  than arsenite, which is  thermodynamically  favored  in anoxlc

-------
  waters  [Ferguson  and Gavls  1972].  Arsenite  is,  thus,   more  mobile  than
  arsenate  In aquifer  systems.   Arsenite  is  also  more  toxic than  arsenate
  [Lemmo et al.  1983].  Thus, in aquifers in which arsenic-containing minerals
  are  present,  redox  conditions  are  very  Important  in  determining  water
  quality.  In  very   anoxlc  waters,   precipitation  of  sulfides  controls  the
  solubilities  of  many elements.   The solubilities of such toxic metals  as
  cadmium and lead are likely to be highest in mildly anoxlc environments that
  contain neither  sulfide  nor metal  oxides, which  are  found in many  shallow
  aquifers.

      Redox  conditions also Influence  mlcrobial   speciation  and  metabolic
  rates.  Different  classes  of  bacteria use different elements and  compounds
 as electron acceptors in respiration  [Stumm and Morgan  1981, Stanier et al.
  1979],  If dissolved oxygen is present in an aquifer,  then aerobic  organisms
 predominate.  If  aerobic  respiration  depletes  the  dissolved  oxygen  in  a
 system that  is closed to  the atmosphere, such as the deeper  parts of  an
 aquifer,   then a  succession  of microbial  populations  utilizing  electron
 acceptors  with decreasing redox potentials may  be  expected.  A typical ^micro-
 bial  succession  may  Include  aerobes,  denitrifiers,  fermentors,   sulfate
 reducers,  and methanogens.   Such microbial successions  have been invoked  to
 explain  the chemical  evolution of  ground waters in several aquifers [Champ
 et al. 1978].  The  availability of preferred electron acceptors will affect
 nicrobial  speciation and  the rates  of biotransformation  of toxic substances.
 For example, the  rate of  degradation of DDT  Is  much greater  in anoxic fresh-
 water  sediment systems than in oxic systems  [Cambrell et al. 198H and refer-
 ences  cited  therein].

     In view of the importance of the redox status  of ground water and other
 natural waters it is desirable to  have a convenient,  reliable indicator  of
 redox  status.   The  potential of a  platinum electrode,  or Eh,  is often  used
 as  a geochemical  redox Indicator [Carrels  and Christ 1965].  This is  because
 the Eh  of  a  water  sample can  be  readily  measured and in veil   defined
 synthetic solutions the Eh  provides a  quantitative  indicator of redox speci-
 ation  [Laitinen 1960].  Also,  in  certain aquatic environments  the Eh can be
 quantitatively  related to  chemical  speciation,  e.g.  waters  of  low  pH and
 high Fe concentrations  [Nordstrom et  al.  1979]  and certain anoxic sediments
 [Emerson 1976].   However,  using the Eh  as a  redox potential for an  entire
aquatic system   is  only meaningful in  systems  that are  in chemical equili-
brium  and  that contain  electroactive  solutes  at   approximately  mi111molar
concentrations  [Stumm and  Morgan   1981],   Most  ground  waters  are  not  in
equilibrium  [Lindberg  and  Runnels  1981].   Furthermore,  the  Eh of natural
waters are often  mixed potentials  determined by two or  more redox  couples,
rather than one dominant couple [Stumm and Morgan 1981].  Thus,  it is usually
not possible to quantitatively relate  chemical speciation  and Eh  in natural
waters.

     In spite  of  its limitations,  the Eh  can be a  useful  qualitative indi-
cator of the redox  status.   Consistently  measured or calculated Eh  values
can  Indicate relative redox levels  in  a single  system.  Such  systems  may
Include successive depths in a sediment or zones in flow systems with simi-
lar concentrations  of major electrolyte ions and electroactive minor ions.

-------
 On  the  other hand,  comparison of the  Eh  values of very  different  waters,
 e.g. well-poised anoxic ground  waters and  poorly-poised  oxic  ground  waters,
 is probably not meaningful.  The most reliable characterization of the redox
 level of  a natural  water is  a complete  chemical  analysis,   including  all
 redox-active species [Hostotler 1981*].   This  is  the  approach  which has been
 taken in this project.

      We have been  collecting  ground  water  samples from  a  pristine sand  and
 gravel aquifer in the Sand Ridge State  Forest near Havana,  Illinois.   Using
 the  materials  and  techniques  that  are  the  least  likely to disturb  the
 chemistry of the ground waters, we have measured Eh, redox speciation,  and
 complementary chemical  parameters  that   enable  calculation of redox  condi-
 tions in the aquifer.  We will  report  our  results and our  interpretations,
 including  calculation  of redox   potentials  from  analytical  data,   redox
 processes causing changes  in  dissolved  oxygen concentrations, the presence
 of hydrogen peroxide,  and  physical  mixing in the  aquifer.
                                  CONCLUSIONS
      The  relative redox status  of ground water  at  the Sand  Ridge  site  is
 related  to the  dissolved  oxygen concentration as shown  by Eh measurements
 and  chemical  speciation calculations.  The  Eh also  qualitatively indicates
 the  relative  redox status  of the ground waters, i.e.  the  lower  the DO the
 lower the  Eh.    In  the deepest waters  sampled,  the  Eh  is  quantitatively
 related  to Fe  speciation.   However,  for other redox  couples and at other
 depths,  there is no quantitative relationship  between  redox speciation and
 Eh.   The  aquifer-ground water  system is not  in redox equilibrium  at any
 depth sampled because calculated redox potentials for several  couples differ
 by  up to hundreds of  millivolts,  corresponding  to  differences in activity
 quotients of  orders of magnitude.  The concentration profile of DO is fairly
 constant and  Is consistent with mixing of  layers of oxic and anoxic water.
 Modeling the  DO  profile may help understand mixing in the aquifer.
                               RECOMMENDATIONS
     The  field studies  should be  expanded to  include  very  anoxic  ground
waters in a  similar  hydrologic environment,  preferably  in  the same aquifer.
Solid oxldants and reductants  in  the aquifer can  be studied  to  determine
their role in  redox  processes.  Geochemical  extractions  can give an estimate
of the aquifer oxidizing or  reducing  capacity.   Redox titrations of aquifer
sediments  can  estimate  the  redox  buffer  capacity of  the aquifer  system.
Respirometry experiments may estimate kinetics of aquifer  redox processes.
Characterization  of  the  organic matter  In ground  water  Is essential  to
understanding aquifer redox  processes  In both oxic and anoxic waters.   This
characterization should  Include complexation of  electroactive metals,  which

-------
  may  influence  measured  Eh  values,  and molecular  weight  and functional group
  determinations,  which  can  indicate  potential  substrates  for  raicroblal
  respiration.
                             MATERIALS AND METHODS
 WELL DRILLING AND INSTALLATION

      The monitoring  wells  for ground water  sampling  were installed  in  the
 Sand Ridge State Forest near Havana, Illinois in the Havana Lowlands region.
 The aquifer being studied  is a water table  aquifer composed of  coarse sand
 and gravel.  The geology and hydrogeology of the area  have been described by
 Walker et al.  [1965].  Hydrologic  investigations have been conducted in the
 area by the Illinois State Water Survey  [Naymik and Sievors 1983,  1985].

      Three wells were drilled in October, 1984  to  nominal  depths  of 35,  50,
 and 65 feet below grade.   One additional well was drilled  in September,  1985
 to a depth  of  104 feet.  The wells were drilled with a  hollow-stem  auger.  The
 auger flights,  well  casing sections, and well screens were steam  cleaned to
 minimize introduction  of foreign  matter into  the boreholes.    During  the
 drilling of the 65-foot  and 104-foot  wells,  split  spoon samples  of  the
 aquifer  material,  i.e.  coarse sand  or sand and gravel, were  taken  for deter-
 mination of Fe  and Mn oxide  contents.

      For  each  well the  casing and screen were  lowered  by han-' through  the
 hollow auger stem.  When  the auger  was  withdrawn,  the sand collapsed around
 the  screen  and  casing  up to  the water  table, approximately 27  feet below
 grade.   Bentonite pellets were poured into the  borehole to form a two-foot
 barrier  to  rapid percolation.   The hole  was  then backfilled with drill
 cuttings  to two to three feet below grade.   Finally,  the hole was filled
 with  expanding  cement and a  steel  locking well protector  was  inserted and
 allowed  to  set   in the  cement.   Details of  construction  of the  wells are
 shown in Figure  1 .

     The 50-, 65-, and 101-foot wells were developed by air lifting.  An air
hose was  lowered to  the bottom of  the well  and compressed air was  used to
 force  the  water out   of  the  well until  the  expelled water was clear.   The
water level in the 35-foot well was too  low  to allow sufficient submergence
 for development by air lifting.  This well was developed  by swabbing.

     A Teflon positive-displacement bladder pump connected  to Teflon tubing
was installed in each well.   Before installation the  pumps  and tubing were
detergent  and  acid-cleaned  followed by thorough  rinsing  with  deionized
water.

-------
   WATER SAMPLING

        For pH,  Eh,  specific  conductance, and temperature measurement ground
   water was  pumped  from  the  well  and  through  a flow-cell  that  held  the
   electrodes  and probes [Garske and Schock  In  press]. The cell was designed so
   that  there would  be  no  air contact with the  ground water and  so that the
   axes  of the  pH and  Eh  electrodes were  aligned  parallel  with,  rather than
   perpendicular   to,  the  direction  of   flow.    This  cell  design  minimizes
   streaming  potential problems in  pH  and Eh measurements  [Gray 1985] as well
   as  preventing accumulation  of  bubbles  in the cell.   The pH  electrode  waa
   calibrated  at  the  temperature of  the ground water using two buffers.

        The  Eh was calculated  from  redox electrode (Orion 977800)  potentials
   using an empirical equation for reference electrode potential as a function
  of temperature [Garske, E. E. unpublished data, Illinois State Water Survey,
  J98UJ.  The response of the two Eh electrodes waa also checked using a redox
  buffer at the  temperature of the ground  water.   The  Eh values calculated
  using  the empirical equation differed from Eh values calculated relative to
  the buffer by +30 to +80 mV.

      Beginning  in  August,  1985  a  polarographic dissolved oxygen (DO) probe
  (Orion  970800)  mounted  in' a  flow-through cell  was  Installed  immediately
  downstream from  the flow-cell.  The DO probe waa calibrated  according to the
  manufacturer's  Instructions.  Conductivity,  pH,  Eh,  and  temperature  were
 monitored in  the flowing  water.   When all parameters  reached  stable values
  (i.e.   less  than 0.05  pH  unite, 10  mV,  or  10  ohms"1  change  in  successive
 casing volumes) the well was considered to be completely flushed.  That  is,
 the water  that  was being  pumped  from  that point on  was considered  to  be
 representative of the aquifer water.  These stable values  were  recorded.

      After well  flushing,  water samples were collected.   Unfiltered  water
 samples were collected  for  organic carbon,  ammonia,  hydrogen  peroxide,
 hydrogen  sulfide,   and  dissolved   oxygen   determinations.  Organic  carbon
 samples were collected In precombusted glass vials. Samples  for ammonia were
 preserved  with f^SOij.  Samples for  hydrogen sulfide were preserved with zinc
 acetate and  sodium  hydroxide.   Samples  for  dissolved  oxygen  and  hydrogen
 peroxide  were  analyzed  immediately  after collection.   Oxygen diffusing
 through the  sampling tubing probably did not appreciably contaminate any of
 our  samples  from the 35-,  50-,  or  65-foot  wells,  but may have contaminated
 the samples from the 101-foot  well  (see Appendix A).

     After  collection  of  the unfiltered samples,  the sampling  tubing was
connected to  a 90 mm diameter  In-line  filter holder (Mllllpore)  containing a
membrane of nominal  pore size 0.1  ym  (Nuclepore 1^1705).  (Note:   the hose
barbs supplied with  the filter holder were replaced "by pressure-tight tubing
fittings.)  The in-line  filter  holder  was  used  to prevent air contact during
filtration, which can cause contamination of ground water  samples  by atmos-
pheric  oxygen accompanied  by oxidation  of ferrous  iron  [Stolzenberg  and
Nichols  1985].    Filter membranes  of nominal pore size 0.1 urn were  used
rather  than  the  more commonly  used 0.45  inn filters because'0.1 jim  filters
are more effective  for the removal of fine particulate  metala from  water

-------
  samples  [Kennedy  et  al.  1974,  Laxen  and Chandler  1982].    A new  filter
  membrane was  used for each well.   At  least 500 mL of water was allowed  to
  flow  through  a new membrane  to  remove soluble contaminants and to equili-
  brate  the  filter  surfaces with dissolved  trace  metals,  thus minimizing
  adsorptive losses [Gardner and Hunt 1981].  After the initial washing,  a 500
  mL filtered sample was collected for alkalinity determinations.  Filtration
  of the alkalinity sample provided further washing of the  filter.  Subsequent
  filtered samples  were collected for major  cations,  anions and silica, and
  trace metals.   Samples for major cations and for trace metals were  collected
  in acid-cleaned bottles  and  were preserved with 1  percent  (by  volume)  HNOj
 and 0.1  percent HC1,  respectively.

      Field blanks  were  collected  using  the  apparatus shown  in  Figure  2.
 Deionized water was forced through  the  filtering  apparatus and  collected  by
 the same procedure as the water  samples.  Thus,  the  field  blanks and samples
 were treated  identically.

      Water  samples were  stored  on ice  immediately after collection.  Upon
 arrival   at  the  laboratory  the  samples  were  refrigerated.   Nonacidified
 samples  were stored for less  than 24 hours before being analyzed.
 ANALYTICAL METHODS

     Determinations  of  the  unstable solutes  dissolved  oxygen, alkalinity,
 and  hydrogen peroxide were  performed in  the  field.   Dissolved  oxygen was
 determined  using the azide modification of  the  Kinkier  method [Rand et al.
 1975].   Alkalinity was determined by potentiometric  titration using Gran's
 method to  locate the equivalence point [Stumm and Morgan 1981].

     Manual  colorimetric methods were  used  to  determine  ammonia [Standard
 Methods  1975]  and iron [Stookey 1970].   Both  solutes were below detectable
 levels  in  early samples. For  the 9/19/85  and  10/17/85  samples from the
 101-foot well,  Fe and  Mn were determined by atomic absorption spectrophoto-
 metry.   After  12/13/84,  samples were screened in  the field for NHj  using a
 field  colorimetric method  (Chemetrics,  Inc.  Calverton,  VA).   If  the NHj
 concentration   was  less  than  0.1   mg  L""1,  the   detection  limit  of  the
 Chemetrics method, the sample was not analyzed for NHj.

     Automated  adaptations of  standard  colorimetric  methods  were  used  to
 determine  orthophosphate,  dissolved  silica,  sulfate,  nitrite,  and nitrate.
 Chloride was determined by automated potentiometrio titration.   Volatile and
 nonvolatile  organic  carbon fractions were determined by wet  oxidation and
 infrared C02 detection [Barcelona 1981].

     Manganese  determinations were  attempted  using   two  electroanalytioal
methods.    From  November,  1981 until March,  1985 cathodic  stripping  voltam-
metry  [Huber   and  Lemmert   1966,   Hrabankova   et   al.   1969]  using   a
wax-impregnated  graphite  electrode.    Manganese concentrations  in  ground
water samples were not significantly different  from blank Mn concentrations.
From  4/23/85  to  6/20/85,  anodic  stripping  voltammetry  using  a  hanging

-------
  mercury drop electrode [O'Halloran  1982]  wa3  used.   However, manganese was
  not detected In any sample.   After  the 6/20/85 sampling trip, Mn determina-
  tions were discontinued because the concentrations were too low for quanti-
  tation.

  Hydrogen  Peroxide

       The  fluorlmetric  scopoletin/horseradish peroxidase method [Andrae 1955]
  incorporating  published modifications [Perschke and Broda  1961 ,  Van Baalen
  and Marler 1966, Cooper  and Zika 1981] and  further  optimization developed
  during  this project,  was used for' hydrogen  peroxide determinations.   Ths
  method has been used to measure 2 nM HgOg in rain water [Zika et al. 1982],
  and recently, H2C>2  in  ground and surface waters [Cooper and Zika 1983]:  The
  method  has  several advantages over other methods  for ^02:   1.    It  is
  extremely  sensitive,   being  based  on  a  compound  which  has  detectable
  fluorescence  in concentrations  lower  than  1  nM;  2.   It  is rapid,  with
  immediate a;     nplete reaction due  to the large turnover rate of the enzyme
 catalyst;   3.     ^t  is  selective,  since the  fluorophore  is  stable  unless
 oxidized by  activated  enzyme and the enzyme  itself  is highly specific  for
 and activated only by peroxides.  (The contribution of organic peroxides  can
 be  determined  separately  if necessary.);  1.   The  stoichiometry has  been
 established — one molecule of fluorophore  is  oxidized  for  each molecule  of
 H2C>2;  and 5.  It is adaptable  to  field  determinations,  eliminating  problems
 of  sample  instability  frequently  encountered  in determinations of very  low
 levels of  H202-

      In the analysis, hydrogen peroxide  present in  the  sample  stoichiometri-
 cally oxidizes  scopoletin, a fluorescent lactone. The reaction is catalyzed
 by the peroxidase enzyme.  The fluorescence  of  the buffered mixture of sample
 and reagent la  measured before and  after  the  addition of  the  enzyme, the
 decrease or quenching  of  fluorescence being proportional to  the  amount of
 hydrogen  peroxide present.   The fluorescence  quenching  is related  to the
 concentration  of hydrogen peroxide  by  the method of standard  additions.
 Linear regression on a plot of fluorescence vs. moles  added peroxide gives
 the  fluorescence response per  mole  of  hydrogen  peroxide  reacted.    This
response factor is used  to calculate  the  amount  of  hydrogen  peroxide in the
ground  water sample.    Ground   water  samples taken  at Sand  Ridge  were
analyzed in  triplicate  within minutes of collection.   At the low observed
concentrations,  i.e.  near  the detection  limit,  It Is important to minimize
the  imprecision  of  the  concentration  determinations and  the potential  for
     In order  v.o correct  for any HgC^  contribution from the reagents,  we
initially  anaij^ed  blanks, substituting  de ionized,  distilled,  and  freshly
redistilled water for the  sample.  However, hydrogen peroxide concentrations
in  the reagent blanks were equal  to  or up to three times greater than those
of  the samples  for  all sampling runs except 1/17, 3/19, 5/15, and 10/17/85.
We  suspected  that  the  distilled water  contained 'HgOg and  tested  this
hypothesis by varying th« oonointralions  of soopolatin una pwoxiaas* and by
adding  the peroxidase before the  scopoletin. Varying the reagent concentra-
tions had no  effeot on  the blanks  and  the H202 signal  in the blanks was

-------
 eliminated  by  addition of the  enzyme  prior to the scopoletin.   Therefore,
 the measured quenching  in  the reagent  blanks  was  due  to ^02 present in the
 distilled water.

      Hydrogen  peroxide  contamination  of  distilled water  may be the  major
 problem with obtaining  reliable reagent blanks.   The stoichiometry of  the
 reaction in distilled water blanks has been found to  be 0.7  to 0.9  moles of
 scopoletin  per  mole  of hydrogen peroxide,  which  is  close to  the  accepted
 value of  1.0  [Perschke and  Broda  1961].    This  supports the  hypothesis  of
 ^2^2 contamination of the  distilled  water  and suggests that  side reactions
 are not responsible for quenching.

      Blanks have  not  been addressed  in  the literature  on  this   method.
 However,  a  number  of authors have  suggested  that f^Og  can  be produced  in
 deionized  distilled water  as a  result  of microbial activity  [Lazrus et  al.
 1985],  photochemical  reactions [Zika  1984],  or by  sparging  with air  [Zika et
 al.  1982].   Perschke and  Broda  [1961]  suggested successive distillation  of
 blank  and  reagent water from KMnOjj,' ' AgNOg,  and finally from  a  quartz  still
 to achieve  sufficient water purity.  However,  none of the previous  workers
 reported  any problems with background  1^2  concentrations  in  their  experi-
 ments.
      We  have further  investigated  the origin of  the  f^Og contamination in
 the distilled water.   We  did  not observe   increases in the levels of H202 In
 the  water during  storage  over  those  in  freshly distilled  water.   Also,
 sparging  the water with  oxygen-free  nitrogen  for several  hours  did  not
 reduce  the  levels  of  #2^2  either.    The  most likely  source of  the ^02
 contaminant  is   in  the distillation  process or  is carried  over  from  the
 original amount  in  the deionized water.

      Only  one set  of  measurements of ^03 in  distilled water  using  the
 scopoletin/peroxidase  method  has been  reported [Perschke and Broda 1961]. In
 this1  paper the water was  redistilled from KHnOj|,  AgN03,  and finally, -from a
 quartz still.  Unfortunately,  since the experiments were  intended  only  to
 establish the stoichiometry of  the  reaction, the  background contribution of
 H202  in  the  distilled water  was  not reported.   It is likely  that hydrogen
 peroxide is  a normal  trace component of our  distilled water,  produced from
 the water itself and varying  with inputs  of radiation  and  dissolved oxygen.
Therefore, while a  large  fraction of our  H202 determinations  do not satisfy
 the conventional analytical criterion of low blanks,  we feel  that  we have
positively identified 1^2  in ground waters from the Sand Ridge site.
                           RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
     The results of chemical analyses of ground water samples from the moni-
toring wells  in the Sand Ridge  State Forest are  presented  in Appendix  B.
Aqueous ammonia, sulfate, phosphate, and dissolved silica concentrations are
expressed  as  milligrams  of solute  per liter  (mg  L~1).    For  example,   a
                                      %

                                      8

-------
 sulfate concentration of  1  mg L~1 is equivalent to 0.0104 millimolar  (mM).
 For nitrate and nitrite the concentrations are expressed as mg N  per liter,
 i.e. a  concentration of  1  mg NOj"  per liter is  equivalent  to 0.0711 mM.
 Alkalinlties are in units of milliequivalents per liter  (meq L~^)  and can  be
 converted to milligrams per liter as CaCOj by multiplying by 50.


 DISSOLVED OXYGEN,  TRACE METALS AND EH

      The dissolved oxygen (DO) profile for 9/19/85  is shown in Figure 3. The
 profile  of  the  upper three wells was  typical of  all  sampling runs.   The
 35-foot  sample  had  the  highest  DO  concentration, which  was near  the  DO
 saturation limit at  the  ground-water temperature.   The 50-foot  sample was
 near DO  saturation with  about  1 mg L~1  less than  in the 35-foot sample.  The
 65-foot  sample had less than 1.5 mg L~* DO.   The DO measured in the deepest
 sample  was approximately-  0.2  mg  L~^.   However,  because of  the presence  of
 Fe2* and  Mn^* in  the  deep waters,  (described  below)  the measured  DO was
 probably an  artifact of sampling.  The  suspected DO  contamination nay have
 resulted from  gas  diffusion through the  sampling  tubing (Appendix A).  Thus,
 0.2  mg  L~1 may  actually  be an upper  limit to the DO  concentration in the
 deep ground waters.   The  gradient in  DO may be caused by mixing of recharge
 water  saturated in  DO  with deep  ground water that is anoxic  and contains
 solutes, such  as Fe^*, that  consume DO.  The time series graph of DO (Figure
 4) shows fluctuations of  up to 1.5 mg L""1  in  one month at all depths.  This
 is greater than the  uncertainty t)f  +/- 0.2 mg  L~1 in the Kinkier DO determi-
 nations, so  the observed  fluctuations  were not an artifact  of the analyses.
 There were no  temporal trends  in DO at any depth.

     The Eh  in the aquifer  is related  to  the DO as shown by  comparing the
 profiles of  DO and  Eh  (Figures 3  and  5,  respectively).  The Eh values  are
 high  in  oxic  waters  from shallow  and  Intermediate depths and  low in  the
 nearly anoxic  deep  waters.  The relative  values  of Eh measured  in the  35-,
 50-,  and 65-foot wells were typical of all sampling trips with  the highest
 Eh measured in the waters from 35 feet, the lowest Eh  in  the  65-foot waters,
and a range of less than 50 mV.  The tine  series  graph of Eh values (Figure
6) shows that,  with the exception  of 2/19, 3/19, and 9/19/95 the  Eh  in  the
three shallow  wells varied  between +330  and  >130  mV.    The  spread in Eh
values for the 35-,  50-,  and 65-foot  wells  was nearly constant for  all
sampling trips and agreement between duplicate readings was usually good.

     Iron  and  Mn  concentrations  were  below  the detection limits of  the
 ferrozlne colorimetric and differential  pulse  anodic stripping  voltammetrlo
m^'.nods,  approximately 2 and 1  yg L""1, respectively, In all samples from the
35-,  50-, and  65-foot wells, in the samples from the  101-foot well, Fe  and
 Mn  concentrations  wort  tpproxlmttly  0,5 ind  0,2 ng  I"1,  roapootivily,
 Assuming that  most  of the dissolved Fe is ferrous;  the partial  pressure of
 oxygen In  equilibrium with this Fe24 concentration at  the pH of the 101-foot
 well is  approximately 10**57 atmospheres,  more than 50 orders  of  magnitude
 less than the partial pressure calculated from  the measured  DO concentra-
 tion.   Using  the  rate  law  for the oxidation of ferrous iron  by  dissolved
 oxygen  [Stumra  and Lee 1961, Singer and  Stumm  1970, Morgan and Stumm 1961],

-------
  the half-life of ferrous iron In the aquifer should be less than two hours,
  which  is certainly much shorter  than  the hydraulic residence time.   These
  discrepancies were  probably  the  result  of  oxygen  contamination  during
  sampling.
 HYDROGEM PEROXIDE

      The time  aeries graph of hydrogen peroxide  is  shown  in  Figure 7.   The
 highest concentrations  were  measured  on  1/17/85.  The 2/19/85  concentrations
 were somewhat  lower than  those  observed  on 1/17.   There  was no consistent
 profile for
      Hydrogen  peroxide  is  an  Important  intermediate  in  the reduction  of
 oxygen in natural waters, a reaction which may  be written  as  the product  of
 two two-electron reductions as shown in equations 2-5 [Breck 197*0


                       02 + 2 H* + 2 e~ --> H202                          (2)
                       H202 - H* * H02~                                   (3)
                       H202 •«• 2 H* + 2 e- --> 2 H20                       CO
                       H02~ * H20 * 2 e- --> 3 OH"                        (5)


 where arrows  indicate  reactions proceeding  in  one  direction and an  equals
 sign Indicates equilibrium.   A steady state concentration may develop  as the
 result of balancing production and consumption reactions.

      The  02/H202  couple  may  be  a  significant participant  In  the   redox
 chemistry of certain natural waters,  but its  Influence has  not been studied.
 In principle, the oxidizing  power  of dissolved oxygen can be controlled  by
 the kinetics of  Its reduction; if the  rate  of reduction of H202 is  slower
 than the  rate of  its  formation,  then the potential  is effectively  that  of
 reaction  4  and 02 becomes a weaker oxldant than  If  it were directly reduced
 to H20 rstumo and Morgan 1981 J.   The reactivity of  H202 Is limited by the
 stability of  th« O-O bond, which  has  half the strength of a single oovalent
 bond.   Although  the dlsproportlonatlon of  H202 to  H20  and  02  is  favored
 thennodynamically  (delta  G -  -234  KJ  mole"*1), It is  klnetloally  slow In the
 absence of trace metal  or enzyme catalysts [Hoffmann  1984].   Thus,  the low
 Fe and Mn concentrations  In the oxlc shallow ground waters at Sand Ridge may
contribute to the persistence of H202.

     The contribution of  the 02/H202  couple to the redox potential measured
 in natural waters may be  important [Breck  1974]*  but  has  not  been assessed.
In the  Sand  Ridge ground waters,  HgO^ concentrations may  be  comparable to
those of other electroactive solutes.  For example,  dissolved  Fe  concentra-
tions were below  the detection limit of approximately 2 yg L~1 , or 36  nM,
which is similar to H202 concentrations measured on some sampling  trips;

     There is now evidence  that H202  is formed, and accumulates,  in the
photooxldatlon of organic compounds in surface and ground waters [Cooper and
                                     10

-------
 Zika 1983].  However, the presence of H202 in  untreated  ground water has not
 previously been reported.  The superoxide radical anion has been implicated
 as a  precursor of H202  [Cooper  and  Zika  1983].  It may  be  formed by many
 reaction pathways  in natural  waters, including the  reduction  of  dissolved
 oxygen by trace metals [Zika 1981].   Hydrogen  peroxide is  formed microbially
 as a by-product  of the  destruction  of  the toxic  superoxide  radical anlon
 [Stanier et al.  1979].   Hydrogen peroxide might accumulate in water due to
 its slow  kinetics  of decomposition  or  the presence of tolerant  organisms
 lacking peroxidase or  catalase enzymes  for its destruction.   For example,
 bottom  waters  of the Volga River contain  hydrogen peroxide concentrations
 1.5 to 2 times higher  than in surface waters, due to biochemical  processes
 [Sinel'nikov  and  Liberman 1971].   Since ^2^2 concentrations in precipitation
 are frequently   orders  of magnitude greater  than  in  ground water  [Zika
 et al.  1982]  due to  atmospheric  photoproduction,  rain  water may also be a
 source  of peroxide  in ground water  (i.e. relict H2(>2 from recharge).
     Van  Baalen  and  Marler  [1966]  first measured  HgOg in  unfiltered sea
 water,  suggesting  that  It might  be  a  "significant  ecological  variable".
 Concentrations  from 15  to 200 nanomolar  were found  in  the  surface ocean.
 From  samples  taken  at  several  sites   they  concluded that  ^2Q2  was  a
 ubiquitous solute  in sea water In the  sampling area.  No evidence was avail-
 able as  to the  source  of the oxidant,  but  atmospheric photoproduction and
 precipitation, photocatalysls by  pigments In the open  water,  and microbial
 activity were suggested.   Kok [1980]  measured H202 in rain water, finding 5
 to 17 micromolar H202  and a dependence of the concentration on "photochemi-
 cal activity prior  to the rainfall".   Zika et al. [1982] found variations in
 rain water  from  south Florida and Bahama  Islands  from 11 to 75 micromolar.
 Draper  and  Crosby  [1983]  reported   levels  from  less  than  the  minimum
 detectable for their  assay, 2 yM, to  30 pM  in irradiated,  highly eutrophic
 surface  waters.     The  photoproduction  of  H202  from naturally  occurring
 organlcs,  including humic compounds,   was  observed.  Cooper  and Zika  [1983]
 exposed unfiltered  surface water and ground water to sunlight and determined
 that H202 photoproduction was a function of the total organic carbon content
 of the water, specifically the concentration of humics. Measurements of H202
 in eight ground  waters prior to sunlight  Irradiation  were  below  unreported
 minimum detectable  concentrations.  They were  probably less than  5  nM [Zika
 et  al.   1985].    The  identification  of   superoxide  as  the H202  precursor
 suggested  to  the  authors  that other  transient reactive  species,  such  as
 hydroxyl radical  and "organic radicals and metastable  intermediates of many
 transition metals  and  nonmetallic  elements"  might be  involved  in  the redox
chemistry  of  natural waters.   It  was  concluded  that the  levels  of  H202
 measured in  irradiated waters could  affect  the  poise,  or redox  buffering
 Intensity,  of the systems. Studies of  H202 photoproduction In  several  ground
waters and surface waters Indicated that  there was little production of H202
 in waters with low  UV absorbance at wavelengths  above  250 nm,  corresponding
 to low concentrations of  humio substances [Cooper and Zika 1981],  Despite
 the wide-ranging  sampling and detailed  analysis of H202 photoaccumulation
 rates,  the only  measurements  of H^   In  ground waters  prior  to irradiation
were below detection limits [Cooper and Zika  1983].
                                     11

-------
  OTHER SOLUTES

       The   concentration   profiles   of  Ca,   Mg,   alkalinity,   and  specific
  conductance  (Figure 8) show a  sharp decrease between 35  feet and 50  feet
  with a smaller decrease between 50 and 65 feet.  These profiles were consis-
  tent for  all  sampling runs. There was  a  small decrease  between 65 and  101
  feet In alkalinitles  and  concentrations of Ca and Kg. Th9 specific conduc-
  tance profile is consistent with the profiles of the major ions.   The  time
  series  graphs  of  Ca,  Mg  and  alkalinity  are  shown   In  Figures   9-11.
  Alkalinlties and Ca,  and Mg concentrations  tend to  Increase with time  at
  depths of 35  and  65  feet and  are  fairly constant at 50  feet.   There  are
  concentration fluctuations of more  than 0.5 mg L~1  month'1  at  all depths.

       The  concentration profiles of  Na,  K, sulfate and chloride  (Figure  12)
  for were  typical of all observed profiles.   There  was a  decrease between 35
  and 50  feet for all four solutes.   Between 50  and 65  feet  concentrations  of
  Na,  K,   and  chloride  concentrations  changed  by  small   amounts,   either
  Increasing or  decreasing,  while sulfate increased.  Between 65 and  101  feet
  Na and  K  increased slightly while chloride and sulfate changed very little.
  Sodium  and sulfate   concentrations   increased  with  time  in  the  35-foot
  samples,  similarly  to  Ca,  Mg,  and alkalinity,  while K  and chloride showed  no
  trend with time  (Figures  13-16).

      The  pH profile  (Figure 17) was typical of all  sampling runs  with  pH
  increasing from  35  to 65  feet.  There was a decrease  in pH from 65 to  104
  feet.   The pH  of  35-,  50-, and  65-foot ground  waters  passed  through a
  maximum  on 12/13/84 and  varied  only  within  0.3  units for  the rest of the
  sampling runs.

      The  concentration profiles of  nitrate and  orthophosphate (Figure 18)
  were representative of most sampling  runs.  Nitrate concentrations decreased
  with depth,  while  phosphate  concentrations  increased.   The decrease  to a
  nearly undetectable nitrate concentration  in the 104-foot  well is consistent
  with the   sharp  decrease   in DO  and  Eh  between  65  and 104 feet. However,
  reduced nitrogen  species,  nitrite or ammonia, were  not  detected.  Nitrate
 concentrations tended  to  decrease  with time  (Figure  19),   while  phosphate
 concentrations  showed   no  particular trend  after  a  sharp  drop  between
     The  concentration  profiles of  DO,  NO*", and  ,  possibly, Q-POjj3"  for
9/19/85 have two  Inflection  points.   All three profiles are  concave upward
from 35 to 65 feet and concave downward from 50 to 104  feet.   Concentrations
of N03~  and DO decrease  with depth, while o-POjj3* concentrations  increase
with  depth.    Concentration  profiles  like  these  can  be  produced   by
diffusion/dispersion.   The  conceptual model  is  that  upgradient from  the
monitoring wells two layers of ground water with different  concentrations of
DO and nitrate  are separated by a thin transitional region.   Diffusion  and
dispersion  causes  the   transitional  layer  to  broaden  and  produces  the
observed   profile.     The   analogous   heat   transfer   problem,  which   is
mathematically  identical,  is  that  of two  semi-infinite rods  of the same
material  but  at   different  temperatures  that are  placed  face  to  face.


                                     12

-------
 Solutions to this problem have been published  [e.g. Churchill 19^1].  It may
 be possible to estimate the average dispersion coefficient  in the  aquifer by
 modeling the concentration profiles of DO,  nitrate, and other solutes.

      The time series graph  of total organic carbon (TOG)  in  the  35-,  50-,
 and 65-foot monitoring wells  is  shown in Figure 21.  There are considerable
 changes in TOC with time  at all depths. Some of the TOC changes in consecu-
 tive  months were in the same direction,  i.e. in one month the changes at 35,
 50,  and 65  feet were all  increases or all decreases. In  other  months the
 changes at  different  depths were  in different directions.  There  did not
 appear  to be a consistent profile of TOC.   Wood and Peraltis [1981] observed
 that  DO decreased and  the partial pressure  of  CO2 increased with depth below
 the active soil zone,  probably due to microbial respiration.   We compared
 month-to-inonth changes  in DO  and TOC in  an attempt to explain the observed
 variations in DO, with significant  correlation indicating  control of DO by
 microbial  respiration.    However,  the relative  uncertainty in  TOC measure-
 ments was  too  large to  make  meaningful correlations.
CALCULATING REDOX POTENTIALS FROM ANALYTICAL DATA

     At equilibrium  the  potential of  a redox couple is given  by the Nernst
equation (equation 6)
                                               *

                     E - E° + (RT In10 / nF) log(Ox/Red)                  (6)
where E  is the potential,  E°  is the standard potential (a  constant),  R is
the gas  constant,  T is absolute temperature,  n  is the number  of electrons
transferred,  F  is  Faraday's  constant,  and  Ox and Red are  the  product of
chemical activities of  the  oxidized  and reduced  aides  of  the atoionioroetric
equation,  respectively.   At   12eC,  the  temperature  of Sand Ridge  ground
waters,   the value  of   RTlnlO/F is 56.6 mV.   In a solution  containing  more
than one redox couple at  equillbriumi all potentials calculated by equation
6 are equal.  However,  natural waters are rarely In redo* aqullibrlum iStuatt
and Morgan 1981].  Thus,  the  potentials  calculated using equation 11  for a
natural  water are  strictly theoretical.  In this section  we  describe how
potentials  are calculated  from  analytical  data  and  compare  measured and
calculated potentials.

     The redox  couples considered were  02^2^2*  Fe(III)/Fe(II), NOa~/NHij*,
Mn(III)/Mn(II)  and SOjj2-/HS~.   For each  couple a range of potentials was
calculated based on ground water analyses in  Tables 1-12 and  these calcu-
lated potentials are compared to the observed range of Eh values.
The potential of the 02/^2^2 GOUPle is given by equation 7


          E(mV) - 695 * 28.3 ( log(DO/54.1) - 2 pH - log[H2023 )         (7)



                                     13

-------
  where  the  standard potential  at  12°C is  695  mV,  square brackets  indicate
  molar  concentrations,  DO is  dissolved oxygen  in  mg L~1  and 51.1  is the
  factor  that  converts  DO to  oxygen partial pressure  at 12°C.    (Strictly
  speaking,  activities  should be  used in  the  Nernst equation,  rather than
  concentrations.    However,  02 and  ^2^2  are  uncharged  species,  so their
  activity coefficients  were assumed to  be 1.0.   Because  pH measures  H+
  activity,  no further ionic  strength correction  is  necessary.)  The maximum
  calculated  0^>/^2^2  potential  was  for  water  samples  collected  from  the
  35-foot well  with a DO of 9 mg L~1 , and  pH of  7.5.   The minimum potential
  was  for 65-foot  samples with DO of  3 mg L'1 and pH of 8.  The DO concentra-
  tions  measured in  the  101-foot well were not considered  because it was felt
  that  the  values  were  questionable.   A.  range  of  H^g concentrations  of
  0.1-10.0  nM was  assumed  for  these calculations.   The  DO-H202  potentials
  ranged  from +130 to +525  mV,  which  overlaps  the observed range  of  most  of
  the  Eh measurements for  the 35-  to 65-foot ground waters,  roughly +350  to
  +1J50 mV.
      For  the  NO^'/NHjj*  couple only nitrate was detected.   As  a result,  the
 Nernst equation becomes an inequality (equation 8)


              E(mV) > 881 + 7.08 ( log[N03~] -• 10 pH - log DL )            (8)


 where the standard potential at 12°C Is 881 mV and DL is the detection limit
 for ammonia nitrogen  (0.05 mg L'1).  (Because the activity coefficient  for
 singly charged ions at  the  Ionic strength of Sand  Ridge ground waters  was
 0.92  as  calculated by  the  Da vies approximation,  the concentration of nitrate
 was used in place  of  the  activity.)  The  minimum nitrate concentration  in
 ground waters  from 35  to 65 feet was 21 microoolar In a  65-foot sample.  The
 calculated  lower  bound for  NOf-NHn*  potentials was   +321  mV,  which  la
 consistent  with the observed  range of Eh values.  If the KHjj* concentration
 were  less than 7  ng L~1 ,  then the calculated potentials would  fall  In the
observed  Eh range.   The NOj'-NHn* potential for the  101-foot ground  waters
of +333 mV  is far from the observed value of +110 aV.

     Iron and  manganese  were  below detection in all  samples collected from
 the 35-,  50-,  and 65-foot wells.  However,  hydrous oxides of Fe  and Mn were
 found In  aquifer  sand  samples,  Thus, lower bounds  for  apparent potentials
of  couples  involving  these  metals can  be  calculated assuming  equilibrium
with the oxides. For the couple Fe(OH)3/Fe2* the Nernst equation becomes the
 inequality  given by  equation 9
                E(mV)  >  756  + 56.6  ( log K - 3 pH - log DL )              (9)


 where a detection limit of 1  vg L~1  is assumed for Fe determination by the
 ferrozlne  method,  all soluble  Fe Is assumed to be Fe2*, and K is the equili-
 brium constant for dissolution  of Fe(OH)3.  The value of K at  12°C Is 1.88


                                      11

-------
 [Langmuir  1969].    (Note  that  the only variable In equation 9  is  pH.)   The
 lower  bound  for  the  Fe(OH)3/Fe2*  potential was  estimated  to be  + 155  raV,
 which  is not  close  to  the observed Eh  values, but  Is at least consistent. If
 the  Fe2*  concentrations  were  less  than 20 ng L"1, and Fe3*  levels were in
 equilibrium   with   Fe(OH)j  as  assumed,  then  the calculated  Fe(OH)3-Fe2*
 potential would fall in the observed Eh range.

     Iron was detected in the 10il-foot ground  waters.   It was assumed that
 all soluble Fe was  in  the ferrous form.  The activity of Fe2* was calculated
 assuming  equilibrium  with  sulfate  and  hydroxide complexes  and using  the
 extended Debye-Huckel  approximation to calculate  the  activity coefficient.
 The activity  of Fe2* was  substituted  for  the detection limit in equation 9.
 The calculated  Fe(OH)3/Fe2* potential was +38 mV.   An uncertainty  in  the
 value  of  the solubility  product  of Fe(OH>3  of one logarithmic unit, a pH
 reading that  was high  by  0.33  pH  units, or a combination  of  smaller uncer-
 tainties  in   these  parameters would  explain the  disagreement between  the
calculated and  measured  potentials.    The  solubility  product  determined at
25 °C was used for  the  potential calculation because the  enthalpy  change of
 the reaction was not listed, which precluded a temperature correction. Thus,
the calculated Fe(OH)3/Fe2* potential  agrees  reasonably well  with  Eh. FeOOH
was also considered as the phase  controlling  Fe3*.  Because the value of  log
K for  FeOOH is 0.98, the  calculated potentials  were lower  than those calcu-
lated  assuming FetOH)} control by approximately 200 mV.   This disagreement
cannot  be rationalized  in terms of experimental  uncertainties.  Obviously, it
 is important to know the form of hydrous Fe oxide%ppesent  in  the aquifer.

     Hanganite, HnOOH, was  assumed to  be  the form  of   hydrous  Mn  oxide
 pr««& in «\i t^iVttr*   For  NnQQtt/Ntt** il\ tilt l^T XQ famCQQ\ frO\H\ 1491 * 56.6 ( -log DL - 3 pH )                (10)


 As with the Fe calculations the only variable in this  inequality is pH.  The
 lower bound for Kn  potentials  calculated according to equation 5 is +570 mV,
 which  is greater than  all but  two extreme  Eh values.   In order for the cal-
 culated Mn potential to fall in the measured Eh range the Mn2* concentration
 would  have to  be  greater than  40 mg  L~^,  which would have  been easily
 detectable.   The standard  potential  for Mn02/Mn2* is higher  than that  for
 MnOOH/Mn2*,  so the potentials calculated  for  the former couple  disagreed
 with measured potentials  by an even greater  amount. Manganese was detected
 in  the 104-foot waters.   However,  assuming the  presence of MnOOH  at  104
 feet,  the calculated Mn potential is +474  mV, which is much  higher than the
 observed  value of  +100   mV.   Apparently  the MnOOH-Mn2*  couple  is  not at
 equilibrium in the  aquifer.

     Measured and calculated potentials are compared in Figure 22.   The best
 agreement  between   calculated  and  measured  potentials was  for  Fe  In  the
 nearly  anoxic 104-foot well.  The potentials  of the other couples  differed


                                      15

-------
  from  Eh  by amounts that were not possible to explain by experimental uncer-
  tainty.   In the shallower,  oxic  wells,  the range  of  potentials calculated
  for  the  Q2~^2°2 couple overlapped the range of  Eh values  measured over one
  year.  However,  for  individual  samples,  the differences between calculated
  and measured potentials correspond to differences in the ratio of Q£ to f^Og
  concentrations  of  many orders  of  magnitude.    Similar lack of  agreement
  between  measured  potentials and  potentials calculated  from  analytical data
  has  been noted  by  Lindberg  and  Runnels  [1984],   in  their   examination  of
  published  ground  water  data.    In  certain special situations  measured  Eh
  values have been found  to correspond to  speciation  of  one  or more elements.
  These  environments  include waters of  streams  receiving acid  mine drainage
  and having low pH values and high Fe concentrations [Nordstrom et al.  1979],
 anoxic ground waters having high Fe concentrations [Back  and Barnes  1965],
 and anoxic sediment  interstitial  waters  having high sulfide concentrations
 [Emerson 1976].   However, in oxic waters at near  neutral pH  the  measured  Eh
 is usually far  from  that calculated from elemental  speciation. The probable
 reason for the  lack  of  agreement  between measured  and  calculated Eh is that
 the system is not in chemical equilibrium.
                                  REFERENCES
 Andrae,  W. A.   1955.   A sensitive  method  for the  estimation of hydrogen
 peroxide  in  biological  materials.   Nature.   175:859-860.

 Anonymous.    1978.    The  Nation's  Water  Resources  1975-2000.    Volume   1:
 Summary.   U.S.  Water  Resources  Council.
                                           i
 Back,  W.  and I. Barnes.   1965.   Relation of electrochemical potentials and
 iron content  to ground-water flow patterns.  USGS Prof. Paper 498-C. 16 pp.

 Barcelona,  M. J.   1984.   TOC  determinations  in ground water.  Ground Wat.
 22:18-24.

 Barcelona,  M. J.,  J.  P.  Gibb,  and R.  A.  Miller.    1983.   A  guide  to the
 selection  of  materials for  monitoring well  construction  and groundwater
 sampling.  U.S.  E.P.A.  - R.  S.  Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory. Ada,
 Oklahoma.  Contract report 809  966-01.

 Barcelona, M.  J.,  J.  A. Helfrich,  and  E.  E.  Garske.   1985.  Sampling tubing
 effects on groundwater  samples.  Anal. Chem.  57:460-464.

 Barcelona, M.  J.,  J.  A.  Helfrich, E.  E. Garske,  and  J.  P. Gibb.  1981.  A
 laboratory  evaluation of  ground water  sampling mechanisms.   Ground  Wat.
Monit.  Rev.  4:32-41.

Barcelona,  M.  J.  and  T.  G.   Naymik.    1984.    Dynamics  of  a  fertilizer
contaminant plume In groundwater.  Environ. Sci. Technol.   18:257-261.
                                     16

-------
 Qreck,  W.  G.    1971.    Redox levels  In the  sea.    In "The  Sea" vol.  5.
 Goldberg, E.  D. (ed.).  Wiley- Interscience.   New York,  pp 153-179.

 Champ,  D.  R.,  J.   Gulens,  and R.  E. Jackson.   1978.  Oxidation-reduction
 sequences in ground water flow systems.  Can.  J. Earth  Sci.  16:12-23.

 Churchill  R.  V.    1941.    "Fourier  series  and  boundary  value  problems".
 McGraw-Hill.   New York,  pp 122-123.

 Cooper,  W.  and R.  Zika.  1983.  Photochemical  formation of hydrogen peroxide
 in surface  and ground waters exposed to sunlight.  Science. 221:711-712.

 Cooper,  W.  J.  and  R.  G.  Zika.   1981.   Photochemical  formation of H202  in
 surface  and ground  water  systems  exposed to sunlight.  Manuscript  submitted
 to Environ. Sci.  Technol.  July,  1984.

 Draper,  W.  M.  and  D.  G.  Crosby.    1983.   The  photochemical generation  of
 hydrogen peroxide   in  natural  waters.   Arch.  Environ.  Contain.   Toxicol.
 12:121-126.

 Emerson,  S.   1976.   Early diagenesls  in anaerobic lake sediments:  chemical
 equilibria  in  interstitial waters.   Geochim. Cosmochira.  Acta. 40:925-934.
                                               «
 Ferguson, J.  F.  and G. Gavis.   1972.   A review of the arsenic  cycle  in
 natural  waters. Wat.  Res.   6:1259-1274.

 Gambrell, R.  P.,  C. N.  Reddy, V.  Collard, G.  Green,  and W.  H. Patrick, Jr.
 1984.    The  recovery  of  DDT,  kepone,  and  permethrin added  to  soil  and
 sediment  suspensions  Incubated under  controlled redox  potential and  pH
 conditions.  J. Wat.  Poll.  Cont. Fed.  56:174-182.

 Gardner,  M. J.  and  D. T. E. Hunt.    1981.  Adsorption of trace metals during
 filtration of  potable water samples with particular  reference to the deter-
 mination  of filtrable lead  concentration.  Analyst 106:471 -
Carrels,  R.  M.   and C.  L.  Christ.    1965.    "Solutions,  Minerals,  and
Equilibria".  Harper and Row, New York.  450 pp.

G?.rske, E. E. and M. R. Schock.  In press.  An inexpensive flow through cell
and measurement system for monitoring selected chemical parameters in ground
water.  Ground Wat. Monit. Rev.

Gray,  D.  M.   1985.   Upgrade  your  pH  measurements  in high-purity  water.
Power, March, 1985, 95-96.

Hitchman, M. L.  1978.  Measurement of dissolved oxygen. Wiley-Interscience.
New York,  pp 71 -74.

Hoffmann,  M.  R.     1984.    The  thenaodynamic,  kinetic,   and  mechanistic
characteristics of hydrogen peroxide In  aqueous solution:   implications  for
atmospheric  chemistry.    Extended  abstract  no.   12  from  conference   on
                                     17

-------
 gas-liquid chemistry of natural waters.   BNL 51757.  Brookhaven National  Lab.
 Long Island, New York  11973.

 Hostetler, J. C.   1984.   Electrode electrons, aqueous electrons, and redox
 potentials in natural waters.  Am.  J.  Sci.   281:731-759.

 Hrabankova,   E. ,  J.  Dolezal,  and  V.  Masin.    1969.    Cathodic stripping
 voltammetry  of manganese.   J. Electroanal.  Chera.   22:32-31.

 Huber,  C. 0. and L.  Lemmert.  1966.  Stripping  and voltammetric  determina-
 tion of manganese via manganese dioxide.  Anal. Chera.  38:128-129.

 Hwang,  C. P., T. H.  Lackie,  and R. R. Munch.   1979.   Correction for total
 organic  carbon,  nitrate,   and  chemical  oxygen  demand  when   using   the
 MF-millipore filter.   Environ.  Sci.  Technol.   13:871-872.

 Jenne,  E. A.  1968.  Controls on Mn,  Fe, Co," Ni, Cu,  and Zn  concentrations
 in  soils and water:   the significant  role  of hydrous  Mn and Fe oxides.   In
 R.  A. Baker  (ed.)   "Trace Inorganics in Water".   ACS Symposium series 73. pp
 337-387.

 Kennedy,  V.  C.,  G.  W.  Zellweger,  and  B.  F. Jones.  1971.  Filter pore-size
 effects on the analysis of Al,  Fe,  Mn,  and Ti in water.  Wat. Resour.   Res.
 10:785-790.

 Kok,  G.  L.  1980.   Measurements  of hydrogen peroxide  in rainwater.   Atmos.
 Environ.  14:653-656.

 Kreyszig,  E.   1972.   "Advanced Engineering  Mathematics"  3rd ed. Wiley.  New
 York.

 Laitinen,  H.   1960.    "Chemical Analysis".   McGraw-Hill.   New  York.   pp
 276-296.

 Langmuir,  D.   1969.   The Gibbs  free  energies of substances  in  the system
 Fe-02-H20-C02 at  25°C.   U.S.  Geol.  Survey  Prof.  Paper 650-B,  pp B180-B183.
 Cited by  Truesdell,  A.  H. and B.  F. Jones,  197lf   J. Res.  U.S.  Geol. Survey
 2:233-218.

Laxen, D. P.  H. and M. Chandler.  1982.  Comparison of  filtration techniques
 for size distribution in freshwaters.  Anal. Chem. 51:1350-1355.

 Lazrus,  A. L., G. L. Kok, S. N. Gitlin, J. A. Lind, and S. E.  McLaren.  1985.
 Automated  fluorometric  method  for  hydrogen   peroxide  in   atmospheric
 precipitation.  Anal. Chem.  57:917-922.

Lemmo, N. V., S.  n.  Faust,  T. Belton,  and    Tucker.   1983.   Assessment of
the chemical and bio Laical significance o*  irsenical compounds in a  heavily
contaminated watsrahrri. Part  1.   The fate and speciation of arsenical com-
pounds  in aquatic  «r-vironments—A  literature review.   J.  Environ.  Sci.
Health.   Al8:3i3-36«.
                                     18

-------
 Lindberg, R. D. and D. D. Runnels.   1981.   Ground water  redox  reactions: an
 analysis cf  equilibrium  state applied  to Eh  measurements  and  geochemica;
 modeling.  Science. 225:925-927.

 Morgan,  J.  J.  and  W.  Stumm.   1961.   Proc.  Second Conf.  on Wat. Poll. Res.
 Pergamon, Elmsford, NY.   Cited by Stumm and  Morgan 1981.

 Naymik,  T.  G. and M. E. Sievers.   1983.   Groundwater  tracer experiment (II)
 at Sand  Ridge State Forest,  Illinois.   SWS Contract Report 331.  Champaign.

 Naymik,  T.   G.  and M.  E.  Sievers.   1985.   Characterization  of dye tracer
 plumes:   in situ field experiments.   Ground  Wat.  23:716-752.

 Nordstrom,  D. K., E. A. Jenne, and J. W.  Ball.  1979.  Redox equilibria of
 iron  in  acid mine waters.   In E.  A- Jenne  (ed.)    "Chemical  Modeling  in
 Aqueous  Systems".   Symposium series  no.  93.  Amer. Chem.  Soc.  Washington,
 D.C.  pp 51-79.

 O'Halloran,  R,  J.    1962.   Anodic  stripping  voltammetry  of  manganese  in
 seawater at  a mercury film electrode.  Anal.  Chim.  Acta. 110:51-58.

 Perschke, H. and E. Broda.   1961.  Determination  of  very  small amounts  of
 hydrogen peroxide.  Nature.   190:257-258.

 Rand, M.  C.,  A.  E.  Greenberg,  and M. J. Taras,  eds.  1975. "Standard Methods
 for  the   Examination  of Water  and Wastewater".  11th  edition.  APHA,  AWWA,
 WPCF.  Washington,  D.C.                           '

 Sinel'nikov  V.  E.  and  A.  Sh.  Llberman.  1971.  Factors influencing the con-
 centration  of hydrogen peroxide and  other oxidants In natural  waters.  Tr.
 Inst. Biol. Vnutr. Vod., Aked. Nauk.   29:27-10. Cited by Zlka [1981].

 Singer,  P.  C. and W. Stumm.   1970.   Science 167:3921.  Cited  by Stumm and
 Morgan 1981.                       '           ...     •

 Stanier,   R.  Y., E. A.  Adelburg,  J. L.  Ingraham,  and  M.  L. Wheells.  1979.
 "Introduction'to the Microbial World".  Prentice-Hall,  Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
 168 pp.

 Stolzenberg,  T.  R.  and  D.   G.  Nichols.    1985.    Preliminary  results  on
 chemical  changes In  groundwater  samples  due  to sampling  devices.    EPRI
 EA-1118.   Elec.  Power Res. Inst. Palo Alto, CA  91301.

 Stookey,   L.  L.    1970.   FerroZine —  a  new  spectrophotometric  reagent for
 iron.  Anal. Chem.  12:779-781.

Stumm, W. and G. F. Lee.   1961.   Ind. Eng.  Chem.   53:113.  Cited  by Stumm
 and Morgan 1981.           ....

-------
 Stumm,   W.   and  J.   J.   Morgan.    1981.    "Aquatic  Chemistry"    2nd  ed.
 Wiley-Intenselence.   New York.

 Van Baalen,  V. and J.  E. Marler.  1966.  Occurrence of hydrogen peroxide In
 sea water. Nature,  no.  5052, p. 951.

 Walker,  w. H.,  R.  E.  Bergstrom, and W.  C. Walton.   1965.  Preliminary report
 on  the  ground-water resources of the Havana region  In west-central Illinois.
 Cooperative  Ground-Water  Report  3.    State Water  Survey,  State Geological
 Survey.   Champaign, IL 61820.

 Wood, W.  W.  and M. J.  Peraitis.   1984.  Origin  and distribution of carbon
 dioxide  in  the unsaturated zone of  the southern high  plains.  Wat.  Resour.
 Res.  20:1193-1208.

 Zlka, R.  G.    198U.   Short-lived oxidants  in  natural  waters.  Conference on
 gas-liquid chemistry  in  natural waters.   April, 1981.  Brookhaven National
 Laboratory.   Extended abstract 52.

 Zika, R.,  E. Saltzman,  W.  L.  Chameldes, and  D.  D. Davis.   1982.  Hydrogen
 peroxide  levels  in  rainwater  collected In.  south   Florida  and  the Bahama
 Islands.  J. Geophys.  Res. 87:5015-5017.

Zika, R.  G.,  E. S. Saltzman, and  W.  J.  Cooper.    1985.   Hydrogen peroxide
concentrations  in the Peru upwelling area.  Mar. Chem.  17:265-275.

ZoBell,  C. E.   1946.*  Studies on redox  potential  of marine sediments.  Bull.
Amer. Assoc.  Petr. Geol.  30:177-513-
                                     20

-------
                                   APPENDIX  A
 OXYGEN DIFFUSION THROUGH SAMPLING TUBING

      Oxygen  is  known  to  diffuse  through  polymeric  materials,  including
 Teflon.    (Teflon membranes  are  used  in  polarographic  oxygen  analyzers
 [Hitchman 1978].)  Thus, it  is  possible that  our ground water  samples  were
 contaminated by  atmospheric  oxygen.   If this were true, then our  dissolved
 oxygen measurements would be biased and there  could have been some  oxidation
 of ferrous iron before sample acidification.   To estimate the extent  of  this
 contamination we  assumed that  the  gradient  of  oxygen  fugacity across  the
 tubing wall  is  linear  and  equal to  the difference between  the fugacity
 inside and  outside the  tube divided  by the  tubing thickness.   Assuming
 steady state in a completely mixed control volume of tubing  and rearranging
 terms yields equation  A1


                   d f(02)  /  dx - (2  v r K A f)  / (Q A r)                 (AT)


 where f(02>  is  the oxygen fugacity,  r is the distance from the center of  the
 tube,A f/A r is  the gradient of D£ fugacity,  Q is the  flow rate,  and K is
 the  mass transfer  coefficient for 02  through Teflon.   The  dimensions of K
 are  (cm3  02 at  STP) (cm~2 sec"1)  (cm of Teflon)  (cm of Hg)~1 and the magni-
 tude  is approximately  1  x 10~9  [Personal communication,  William Buxton, Du
 Pont  Company, February 1985],  Integration of equation B1 gives


                       z  / z0 -  exp(-2  K L / (KH Q))                    (A2)


 where  z  is the  difference in  Og  fugacity (in atmospheres) between the atmos-
 phere  and the inside of  the  tube at a given point, L is the distance from
 the  beginning of the tube to the point of integration,  and  Zo  is the value
 of  z  at  the beginning  of th«  tube,  i.e. at  L  -  0.    The difference  in
 fugacity  is defined by equation  A3


                             z - 0.2 - DO / KH                          (A3)


 where,  the approximate  fugacity  of 02 in air  is 0.2 atmospheres, and  KH is
 the Henry's law constant for oxygen dissolution.  For  initially  anoxic water
 being  pumped through  100 feet  of tubing at a  rate  of  1000 mL min'1  the
measured  DO would  be  0.14  mg  L"1,  which Is  similar  to the  observed  DO
values.   For waters having  initial DO  values  of 3*5 and 8.5  mg L~1,  the
 calculated  Increases  in  DO  would be  0.10 and  0.03  ng  L"1, respectively.
 These  increases are less than the uncertainty  in the Kinkier  titration.
                                      21

-------
     Using  the rate  law for  ferrous  Iron  oxidation by  dissolved  oxygen
[Stumm and Morgan 1981] It Is possible to predict the rate of oxidation  due
to 0? diffusion through sampling tubing.  The resulting  system  of  differen-
tial equations cannot be conveniently  solved  in closed form.   We used  a
fourth-order  Runge-Kutta method  [Kreyszig  1972]  to solve  the  equations
numerically.   The solutions for a  number  of Initial conditions (DO,  Fe  )
and pumping rates are presented In Table A1.  The flow rates  of  100 and 1000
mL  rain"1  are  typical  of flow  rates  during  ground water  filtration  and
sampling  for  DO measurements, respectively.   The  DO concentrations of  0,
3 5, and  8.5  mg IT1  are typical of ground waters from 10H,  65, and 35 feet
depths,  respectively.   If this model Is correct, then oxygen contamination
can seriously  affect  the  determination of DO, Fe  speciatlon, and,  possibly,
Eh in mildly anoxic ground waters.  We are  planning experiments to  test  the
diffusion hypothesis.
     	TABLE A1.  OXYGEN DIFFUSION THROUGH SAMPLING TUBING	

      Initial DO     Initial Fe2*         •   •         DO         Fe2*
     Concentration   Concentration   Flow Rate     Increase    Decrease
       (mg L~1)          (pM)        (ml rain"1)   (ml min"1)     (wM)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.5
3.5
8.5
8.5
0.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
100
100
1000
1000
100
1000
100
1000
1.36
1.36
. 0.11
0.1H
0 ,94
0.10
0.33
0.03
KM
0.85
—
0.99
—
—
VM
—
                                      22

-------
                           APPENDIX B

               TABULATION OP GROUND WATER ANALYSES
TABLE B1.  ANALYSES OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED 11/13/81
Depth (feet)
Temperature (degrees C)
PH
Eh1a (mv)
Eh2a (mv)
Conductivity (yS/cra)
Alkalinity (meq/L)b
Ammonia
Nitrite
Nitrate
SulfaU
Chloride
Orthoptiosphate
Sulfide
Dissolved Silica
Purgeable Organic Carbon
Nonpurgeable Organic Carbon
Calcium
Magnesium
Sodium
Potassium
Iron (yg/L)
Manganese (\ig/L)
35
13.2
7.90
379
379
310
3.69
<0.05
<0.01
1.72
S8»9
2.38
0.11
<0.025
11.1
1.6
0.7
55.7
19.1
2,66
0.59
<0.1
<0.05
50
13.1
8.09
371
357
255
3.20
<0.05
<0.01
1.16
\9»7
1.88
0.16
<0.025
11.1
1.7
0.1
15.5
16.5
2.23
0.57
<0.1
<0.05
65
12.0
8.19
371
371
208
2.15
<0.05
<0.01
2.03
\9tl
1.96
0.17
<0.025
13.3
1.1
0.1
36.7
13.1
1.97
0.17
<0.1
<0.05

Notes:  aE1, E2 are Eh values calculated according to
         equation 1.
        ^Concentration units are mg/L except as noted.
                              23

-------
TABLE B2.  ANALYSES OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED 12/13/83
Depth (feet)
Temperature (degrees C)
pH
Eh1 (mv)
Eh2 (mv)
Conductivity (pS/cm)
Alkalinity (meq/L)
Amn»nla-N
Nitrite
Nitrate
Sulfate
Chloride
Orthophosphate
Total Phosphate
Dissolved Silica
Nonpurgeable Organic Carbon
Purgeable Organic Carbon
Calcium
Magnesium
Sodium
Potassium
Iron (ug/1)
Manganese (pg/1)
Dissolved Oxygen
Hydrogen Peroxide (nM)
35
11.1
8.20
338
336
272
3.81
0.1 Up
<0.01
1.20
3*».8
1.95
<0.050
<0.050
15.2
0.7
2.0
56.0
19.6
2.8
0.8
<2.0
<1.0
9.30
6.9
50
10.3
8.U6
311
339
235
3.42
0.098
<0.01
1.42
19.7
1.33
<0.050
<0.050
15.1
0.7
1.6
47.6
17.2
2.4
0.8
<2.0
<1.0
8.00
2.8
65
9.7
8.66
338
335
180
2.45
0.071
<0.01
1.56
19.7
1.60
0.055
0.067
13.9
0.7
2.2
36.0.
12.8
2.0
0.4
<2.0
<1.0
4.21
6.5

-------
  TABLE B3.   ANALYSES OF GROUND  WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED  1/17/85
Depth (feet)a
Temperature (degrees C)
PH
Eh1b (mv)
Conductivity (uS/cm)
Alkalinity (meq/L)
Amraonia-N
Nitrate
Sulfate
Chloride
Orthophosphate
Dissolved Silica
Nonpurgeable Organic Carbon
Purgeable Organic Carbon
Calcium
Magnesium
Sodium
Potassium
Iron (vg/1)
Manganese (wg/1)
Dissolved Oxygen
Hydrogen Peroxide (nM)
35
8.9
7.73
293
224
3.79
<0.05
1.16
30. 34
2.09
<0.05
15.2
0.5
1.7
56.4
19.6
2.8
0.8
<2.0

-------
TABLE B4.  ANALYSES OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED 2/19/85

Depth (feet)
Temperature (degrees C)
PH
Eh1 (mV)
Eh2 (mV)
Specific conductance (uS/cm
Alkalinity (roeq/L)
Nitrate
Sulfate
Chloride
Dissolved Silica
Prugeable organic carbon
Nonpurgeable organic carbon
Calcium
Magnesium
Sodium
Potassium
Iron (pg/L)
Dissolved Oxygen
Hydrogen Peroxide (nM)
35
10.5
7.65
532
553
320
4.43
1.58
35.7
2.70
15.5
3.9
3.8
58.0
20.2
2.8
0.8
<2.0
10.2
23.0
50
10.2
7.96
539
562
250
3.64
1.43
17.9
-2.17
• 15.1
•1.1
1.3
44.8
16.7
2.0
0.4
<2.0
9.4
2.9
65
10.1
8.16
517
538
210
2.77
1.17
22.7
5.70
11.2
0.9
1.1
36.4
13.6
2.0
0.4
<2.0
5.3
7.5
                               26

-------
TABLE B5.  ANALYSES OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED 3/19/85
Depth (feet)
Temperature (degrees C)
PH
Eh1 (mV)
Eh2 (mV)
Conductivity (yS/cm)
Alkalinity (meq/L)
Nitrate
Su.lfate
Chloride
Orthophosphate
Dissolved Silica
Purgeable Organic Carbon
Nonpurgeable Organic Carbon
Calcium
Magnesium
Sodium
Potassium
Iron (yg/1)
Manganese (yg/1)
Dissolved Oxygen
Hydrogen Peroxide (nM)
35
13.0
7.57
386
108
358
1.10
0*81
12.1
2.28
0.0173
16.3
0.6
1.2
58.3
21.1
2.6
0.7
<2.0
<1 .0
9.6
<1.0
50
11.5
7.82
386
107
270
3.02
KOI
18.5
0.68
0.0300
15.7
0.1
<0.1
13. 1
16.5
2.0
0.6
<2.0
<1 .0
8.6
1.3
65
13.2
8.01
372
388
221
2.12
1*60
22.3
1.10
0.0668
11.5
0.5
0.1
36.1
13.8
1.9
0.6
<2.0
<1 .0
3.7
1.2
                               27

-------
TABLE B6.  ANALYSES OF GROUND WATERS SAMPLES COLLECTED 4/23/85
Depth (feet)
Temperature (degrees C)
PH
Eh1 (mV)
Eh2 (mV)
Conductivity (,\iS/cm)
Alkalinity (meq/L)
Sulfate
Chloride
Orthophosphate
Dissolved Silica
Purgeable Organic Carbon
MonpuTffMbl* Organlo Carbon
Calolu*
Magn«9liun
Sodlua
Potassium
Iron (ug/D
Dissolved Oxygen
Hydrogen Peroxide (nM)
35
13.0
7.55
321
359
3*0
3.86
HO.O
2.33
0.023
15.2
<0.1
0.2
60. t
20.4
2.?6
0.66
<2.0
9.8
<1 .0
50
13.2
7.71
321
359
265
3.07
20.0
1.26
0.035
13.8
<0. 1
<0. 1
44.7
16.0
2. OS
0.62
<2.0
8.6
1.3
65
n.i
7 '.97
31*
342
225
2.H6
20.0
1.50
0.072
15.0
0.2
0.4
37.*
13.4
1.91
0.54
<2.0
1.5
<1 .0

-------
TABLE B7.  ANALYSES OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED 5/15/85
,
Depth (feet)
Temperature (degrees C)
PH
Eh1 (mV)
Eh2 (mV)
Conductivity (uS/cm)
Alkalinity (meq/L)
Nitrate
Sulfate
Chloride
Orthophosphate
Dissolved Silica
Purgeable Organic Carbon
Nonpurgeable Organic Carbon
Calcium
Magnesium
Sodium
Potassium
Dissolved Oxygen
Hydrogen Peroxide (nM)
35
12.6
7.17
121
113
350
3.95
1.13
11.1
1.95
<0.010
15.1
0.2
0.9
60.2
20.1
2.71
0.61
9.5
8.5
50
13.0
7.76
112
131
270
3.13
1.09
19.2
0.82
<0.010
11.9
0.1
0.6
11.3
15.9
2.10
0.60
8.8
2.3
65
13.1
7.95
107
127
230
2.53
0.77
23.3
1.02
0.053
11.0
0.2
0.1
37.2
13.2
1.93
0.52
1.2
1.9
                              29

-------
 TABLE B8.   ANALYSES OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED 6/20/85
Depth (feet)
Temperature (degrees C)
pH
Eh1 (mV)
Eh2 (mV)
Conductivity (uS/cm)
Alkalinity (meq/L)
Nitrate
Sulfate
Chloride
Or thophosphate
Dissolved Silica
Purgeable Organic Carbon
Nonpurgeable Organic Carbon
Calcium
Magnesium
Sodium
Potassium
Dissolved Oxygen
35
11.9
7.10
129
111
119
1.18
1.11
16.0
2.36
0.018
*
15.1
1.7
<0.1
61.8
21.6
2.88
0.65
9.1
50
12.7
7.67
123
109
120
3.19
1.22
21.7
1.25
0.016
11.9
0.2
0.1
15.2
16.7
2.19
0.61
7.9
65
13.0
7.90
318
361
70
2.66
0.15
27.6
1.11
0.088
11.0
0.1
<0.1
38.9
11.2
2.05
0.51
1.5

Note:  Hydrogen peroxide analyses not performed.
                              30

-------
TABLE B9.  AMALYSES OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED 7/23/85
Depth (feet)
Temperature (degrees C)
PH
Ehl (mv)
Eh2 (mv)
Conductivity (pS/cm)
Alkalinity (meq/L)
Nitrate
Sulfate
Chloride
Orthophosphate
Dissolved Silica
Purgeable Organic Carbon
Monpurgeable Organic Carbon
Calcium
Magnesium
Sodium
Potassium
Dissolved Oxygen
Hydrogen Peroxide (nM)
35
11.2
7.56
385
375
355
3.69
1.18
42.3
2.11
0.019
15.7.
<0.1
0.8
65.0
22.4
2.96
0.66
10.3
<1.0
50
11.9
7.83
379
367
258
2.97
0.97
23.7
2.18
0.037
15.2
<0.1
<0.1
43.7
16.1
2.14
0.60
9.4
5.8
65
12.2
8.04
371
357
237
2.59
0.56
31.6
1.41
0.028
14.2
<0.1
0.4
39.9
14.6
2.10
0.56
4.5
<1.0

-------
TABLE  B10.  ANALYSES OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED 8/22/85
,
Depth (feet)
Temperature (degrees C)
PH
Eh1 (mV)
Eh2 (mV)
Conductivity (uS/cm)
Alkalinity (raeq/L)
Nitrate
Sulfate
Chloride
Orthophosphate
Dissolved Silica
Purgeable Organic Carbon
Nonpurgeable Organic Carbon
Calcium
Magnesium
Sodium
Potassium
Dissolved Oxygen
35
11.9
7.57
433
435
317
4.37
1.07
44.5
2.31
0.0100
15.0
0.7 .
0.7
63.2
22.6
2.80
0.60
9.1
50
12.8
7.76
421
420
228
3.13
0.89
20.5
1.15
0.0167
11.5
0.6
<0.1
42.5
16.2
2.00
0.50
8.0
65
13.1
8.13
381
376
228
2.74
0.43
28.6
1.49
0.0670
13.9
0.7
0.3
41.0
15.4
2.00
0.50
4.2

Note:  Hydrogen peroxide analyses not performed.
                                32

-------
TABLE B11.  ANALYSES OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED 9/19/85
,
Depth (feet)
Temperature (degrees C)
PH
Eh1 (mV)
Eh2 (mV)
Conductivity (pS/cm)
Alkalinity (meq/L)
Nitrate
Sulfate
Chloride
Orthophosphate
Dissolved Silica
Nonpurgeable Organic Carbon
Calcium
Magnesium
Sodium
Potassium
Iron
Manganese
Dissolved Oxygen
Hydrogen Peroxide (nM)
35
12.5
7.60
568
555
325
1.16
1.06
43.8
2.45
0.004
15.7
0.7
65.6
22.7
3.00
0.66
<0.08
<0.03
8.5
4.5
50
13. 4
7.91
557
546
234
.2.98
0.80
19.9
1.14
d.021
15.1
0.2
42.3
16.0
2.04
0.58
<0.08
<0.03
7.3
1.7
65
13.8
8.08
524
504
230
2.73
0.34
29.4
1.42
0.051
14.3
0.1
41.9
15.6
2.13
0.54
<0.08
<0.03
3.5
1.7
104
15.9
7.77
114
116
223
2.39
0.04
28.6
1.30
0.101
16.4
0.4
38.6
12.3
3.06
0.72
0.49
0.18
0.2
2.3
                              33

-------
 TABLE B12.  ANALYSES OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED 10/17/85

Depth (feet)
Temperature (degrees C)
PH
Ehl (mv)
Eh2 (mv)
Conductivity (mS/cm)
Alkalinity (meq/L)
Nitrate
Sulfate
Chloride
Orthophosphate
Dissolved Silica
Calcium
Magnesium
Sodium
Potassium
Iron
Manganese
Dissolved Oxygen
Hydrogen Peroxide (nM)
35
12.0
7.76
418
394
345
4.52
0.86
46.0
2.58
0.04
15.4
68.2
23.9
3.08
0.68
<0.08
<0.03
9.7
27.5
50
11 .8
8.04
420
396
235
3.00
0.77
20.9
1.18
0.04
14.6
42.8
16.1
2.03
0.58
<0.08
<0.03
8.5
a
65
12.1
8.21
401
381
236
2.86
0.42
29.6
1.50
0.07
14.0
43.2
16.1
2.14
0.56
<0.08
<0.03
3.1
22.0
104
12.4
8.00
109
101
230
2.59
0.03
27.8
1.46
0.11
15.8
39.0
12.5
3.03
0.72
0.46
0.16
0.7
a

Note:  aHydrogen peroxide only determined in 35- and 65-foot
        samples.

-------
          WELL DOM         WELL DOM

                  8 Inch dlanwttr
                                 WELL006S        WELL 00105
   20
m
Z
t
in
O  60
   80
  100 L-
                                           X
                                     Bmtonta
                                       Plug
                                      inttrval
77J
TIL
                                            feu
                                           Tabta
                                                    bonhote
                                                                   ZZZ
             Figure f.  Construction of monitoring wells.
                                   35

-------
                Nitrogen
                Pressure
Tubing Connector
   (Swagelok)
                                     To Filter Holder
Bored-through Fitting
     (Swagelok)
                                                -Bottle Containing
                                                 Deionized Water
                                               • Pressure-tight
                                                Plexiglas Vessel
   Figxire 2.   Apparatus for filter  blanks.
                             36

-------
9
    0


 -10


 -2O


 -3O


 -4O


 -50


 -60


 -7O


 -8O


 -90


-100 H


-11O
                                      4             6

                               DTs*olvftd Oxygan (mg/L)
                                                                i
                                                                8
             Figure 3.   Concentration profile of dissolved oxygen in
                        Havana lowlands aquifer, 9/19/85.
                                      37

-------

c
9



I

o
1

o
M
J»

O
11





10






 9 -






 8 -






 7 -






 6 -






 5 -






 4 -
                      I

                     100
                                               200


                                      Time (days)
300
    Figure 4.  Tine aeries graph of diaaolved oxygen concentrations

                      in Havana lowlanda aquifer.

                       n 35, * 50. O 65 feet.
                             38

-------
    0 -|
  -10 -
  -20 -
  -3O -
  -4O -

  -50 -
  -60 -
  -70 -

  -80 -
  -90 -

-100 -
-11O -
     1OO
200
30O         400
    Eh (mV>
500
60O
   Figure 5.   Profile of Eh values In Havana lowlands aquifer, 9/19/85.
                                 39

-------
v^


U
     eoo
     soo -
     4OO -
     300 -
     2OO -
     100 -
                                                               300
                 O   35
   Tlm« (days)
50      o   65
A   104
       Figure 6.   Tine series graph of Eh values in Havana lowlands aquifer.
                        D35,   * 50.  O 65.  A 101 feet.

-------
9
Q.
9

2
•o
      20 -
      10 -
                          100
    200

Tim* (days)
300
4OO
          Figure 7.  Tlae series graph of hydrogen  peroxide concentrations
                             in Havana lowlands aquifer.
                             D 35. * 50,  O 65 feet.
                                      JJ1

-------
0.
&
         Co
         Concentration, Conductivity
Mg       *  Alk (m«q/L>             A   Cond/100
         Figure 8.  Concentration profiles of  calolum, magnesium, alkalinity
          and  profile of conductIvlties In Havana lowlands aquifer,  9/19/85.
              D Ca2*.  + Mg2*. O Alkalinity,   ASpeolfio Conductance.

-------
 o
v^
 o
o
                            100
                              35
        2OO
TIm« (days)
 •f  SO
          300
OS
               Figure 9.  TiM aeries graph of oalolua concentrations
                             In Havana lowlands aquifer.
                             D 35. * 50. O 65 feet.

-------
I
25
24 -
23 -
22 -
21 -
2O -
10 -
18 -
17 -
   •
10 -
15-
14 -
13 -
12 -
11 -
10
                         100
                                   200
                               Tim* (day*)
300
4OO
               Figure 10. Tiae series graph of magnesium concentrations
                             In Havana lowlands aquifer.
                             D 35. * 50. O65 feet.

-------
 ?
&
&
 c
1=
 o
JX
                            100
         200

Ttm« (doy»)
300
                    Figure 11.  Time aeries graph of alkalinities
                             in Harana lowlands  aquifer.
                              D 35,  * 50.  O 65  feet.

-------
I
o
     o

  -10

  -20

  -30 -

  -4O -

  -50 -

  -60 -

  -70 -

  -80 -

  -90 -

-100 -

-110
     0.0
      Sulfote
                      0.1
0.2
 i
0.3
                                  Concentration (mM)
                               Chloride            o   Na
0.4
                           6.   K * 10
0.5
      Figure 12.  Concentration profiles  of sulfate, chloride, sodium,
             and potassium in Havana lowlands aquifer, 9/19/85.
                      D SOj,2", + Cl",  O  Na*,  A K*.

-------
             100
  I  -
200
300
                             (days)
Figure 13.  Time aeries;graph of sodium concentrations
             In Havana lowlands aquifer.
               D35,  * 50, O65 feet.

-------
o
\
£
      20 -:
      15
                            100
300
                                      Tlm« (days)
                 Figure 14.   Time series  graph of aulfate concentrations
                               in Havana  lowlands aquifer.
                               D 35,  + 50,  O 65 feet.
                                        48

-------
o>
      o.o
     0.8 -
     O.7 -
     0.6 •;
     0.5 -
     0.4 -
     O.3
          0  •
100         .       200

          Tim* (day*)
300
              Figure 15.  Time aeries graph of potassium concentrations
                             In Havana lowlands aquifer.
                              D35, * 50,  O 65 feet.

-------
•o
*c

3.
c.
u
                            100
         200


Tim* (days)
                Figure 16.  Time aeries graph of chloride  oonoentrationa

                              in Havana lowlands aquifer.

                                D35, + 50,O 65 feet.
                                      '50

-------
ex
9
o
    0



 -10 -i



 -2O -



 -30 -



 -4O -



 -50 -



 -60 -



 -7O -



 -80 -



 -90 -



-100 -



-11O
         7.5
                         i

                        7.7
7.9
8.1
                                          PH
        Figure  17.  Profile of pH raluea in Havana lowlands aquifer,  9/19/85.
                                       51

-------
a
a
 -20 -


 -JO -


 -4O -


 -50 -


 -60 -


 -70 -


 -80 -


 -9O -


-10O -
   -110
        O.OO
                O.02
                     NftraU
0.04
O.OO
O.Od
O.10
                              Concentration (mi
                                  •f  •  Phoapnat* * 100
         Figure 18.  Concentration  profiles of nitrate and orthophosphate
                oonoentratlona In Havana lowlands aquifer* 9/19/85*
                              D 1103-, * o-PO*3-.
                                    :  52

-------
V—»


s
*->
z
                            10O
         2OO

Tlm« (day*)
300
               Figure 19.  Time series graph of nitrate concentrations
                             In Havana lowlands aquifer.
                               D 35,  *  50,O 65 feet.
                                        53

-------
a.
M
o
.c
OL
O
                                               200


                                      Tim* (days)
          Figure 20.  Ti«e series graph of orthophosphate concentrations
                            in Havana lowlands aquifer.

                             D35,  * 50,  O65 feet.

-------
w«

1
v«*

I
c
o
o»
o
»•
o
           Figure 21.  TiM aeries graph of organic carbon concentrations
                             In Harana lowlands aquifer.

                             O 35,  * 50,  O 65 feet.
                                     55

-------
                600
                              Eh     O2/H2O2
                500
                400
   (35-65)
NOJTNHj


      (35-65)
               300
           ui
               200
               100
—   Fe(OH)3/Fe2+


             (35-65)



Eh

— (104)


     Fe(OH)3/Ft2*

          — (104)
Figure 22.  Comparison of" Measured and calculated redox potentials
                 in Havana Lowlands ground waters.
   MuBbers in parentheses are depths.   Dotted lines in Eh range
include extreaw values, solid line includes all but extreme values.
      Arrows  indicate lower bounds of  calculated potentials.
                                56

-------