AIR POLLUTION CONTROL TECHNOLOGY APPLICABLE

     TO 26 SOURCES OF VOLATILE ORGANIC

                 COMPOUNDS
                Prepared By
   Emission Standards and Engineering Division
   Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
                 May 27, 1977
    U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
  Research Triangle Park, North Carolina  27711

-------
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL TECHNOLOGY APPLICABLE

     TO 26 SOURCES OF VOLATILE ORGANIC

                 COMPOUNDS
                Prepared By
   Emission Standards and Engineering Division
   Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
                 May 27, 1977
    U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
  Research Triangle Park, North Carolina  27711

-------
                             INTRODUCTION

     In recent months, OAQPS has redirected much of its effort to the
review of control technology for principal  sources of volatile organic
compounds (VOC).  The output of these studies will be control  technology
guidelines (CTG) documents and, where appropriate, new source performance
standards.  CTG documents identify the effectiveness of alternative
control technologies as well as costs, applicability, and energy and
environmental considerations.  CTG documents are now available in draft
or final form for degreasing, dry cleaning, gasoline bulk terminals,
five specific surface coating operations, and miscellaneous petroleum
refinery sources.
     Since much of the requisite control technology and related information
is available for several other VOC sources, it was deemed desirable to
prepare statements which highlight air pollution control aspects for the
26 VOC sources cited herein.  The statements briefly describe technologies
which are applicable and cite costs, energy and environmental  impacts,
and factors which may limit applicability of the technologies along
with principal references.  It is OAQPS intention to finalize CTG
documents for these VOC sources over the next 12 months.
     The VOC sources for which control technology summaries are presented
cover a broad spectrum of industry ranging from petroleum refining
through gasoline marketing, surface coating, and solvent-use industries.
Current emissions from the 26 sources are estimated to be approximately
6,500,000 metric tons per year.  This total represents 23 percent of
all VOC sources and 37 percent of stationary sources.

-------
     A number of major VOC sources (representing an additional 38 percent
of the stationary source emissions) are under study but are not included
in this summary.  Five specific surface coating industries  (automobile
assembly, can, coil, paper, and fabric coating) and the dry cleaning
industry were not summarized since CTG documents will  be available in the
very near term.  Chemical manufacturing operations are also not included
since OAQPS has just initiated a major contract effort in this area which
will not yield initial results until mid-1978.   Work has also been
initiated to assess VOC emissions from ship and barge transfer operations.
Stage II (vehicle fueling) service station controls are not included
because comments on the November 1, 1976, proposal are under review.
The remaining 25 percent of the VOC emissions from stationary sources are
emitted from combustion sources, other manufacturing processes, and
small solvent users.  Should you be aware of major VOC sources which
                                  d
have not been scheduled for review, please bring them to the attention
of Mr. Robert T. Walsh, Chief, Chemical and Petroleum Branch, Emission
Standards and Engineering Division, MD-13, U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina  27711.
                                   ii

-------
                           TABLE OF CONTENTS
                                                                 Page Number
Storage of Crude Oil and Gasoline . 	 	 ....   1
Tank Truck Gasoline Loading Terminals	   5
Bulk Gasoline Plants	 8
Gasoline Service Station Underground Tank Loading ..........  11
GasolineJTank Trucks in Transit .	  14
Petroleum Refineries
     Leaks from Miscellaneous Refinery Sources  •	"• •  •  16
     Refinery Process Drains and Wastewater Separators  . .   . . .. .  .  19
     Refinery Vacuum Producing Systems  	 ....   	  22
     Refinery Process Unit Turnaround • 	 ..........24
Leaks from Natural Gas and Natural Gasoline Processing  	  26
Plants               .
Leaks from Oil and Gas Production Fields	  29
Cutback Asphalt Paving	  .31
Cold Cleaning with Organic Solvents . . 	34
Vapor Degreasing	  .  38
Graphic Arts
     Rotogravure Printing Operations	 ...  43
     Web-Offset Printing Operations	  4.5
     Web Letterpress Printing Operations	  48
     Flexographic Printing Operations 		  52
                                 iii

-------
                                                             Page Number
Rubber Tire Industry
     Camel back or Tread End Manufacture	  55
     Fabric and Wire Dip and Cement	57
     Green Tire Spraying	60
Adhesives  	 .......  62
Large Appliances	64
Magnet Wire Coating		67
Flat Wood Products	70
Industrial Surface Coating  	  ............  73
                                  iv

-------
                   STORAGE OF CRUDE OIL AND GASOLINE

Process Description
     The floating roof tank is most commonly used for storage of gasoline
and crude oil.  The tank consists of a welded or riveted cylindrical
vessel equipped with a deck or roof which floats on the liquid surface
and rises and falls according to the liquid level in the tank.  The liquid
surface is completely covered by the roof except for the space between the
roof and the wall.  A sliding seal(s) attached to the roof contacts the
tank wall and covers this space.  Escape through this seal is the primary
source of hydrocarbon emissions.
Base Line Emissions
     Base line (current control) hydrocarbon emissions nationwide from
gasoline and crude oil storage tanks calculated from correlations in API
                                                 1 7
Bulletin 2517 are 1,540,000 metric tons per year. '   This represents 8.9
percent of the estimated 1975 national emissions from stationary sources.
Approximately 60 percent or 926,000 metric tons per year are from floating
roof tanks.  The new source performance standard promulgated March 8, 1974,
and many State and local regulations require floating roofs for storage of
gasolines and crude oils after the point of crude oil custody transfer.
The remaining 614,000 metric tons per year .emissions are primarily from the
storage of crude oil and gasoline in fixed roof tanks where floating roof
tank control is not required.
Control Technology
     A floating roof tank with a single (primary) sliding seal, either a
metallic-shoe-type seal or nonmetallie-resilient-type seal, is the most commo.
used control technology.  While this technology has the potential for

                                    1

-------
reducing emissions by 70-90 percent compared to storage in a fixed roof
tank, nevertheless there are still substantial emissions largely through
the seal system.  Seal losses increase if there is an improper fit
between the single seal and wall which creates gaps through which vapors
are released, leakage through the fabric cover that is used to bridge
the space between the shoe seal  and the floating roof, or gaps caused by
rivet heads in the older riveted tanks.
      While good maintenance and inspection .programs may be effective in
reducing emissions through the single seal, recent industry tests have
indicated that significant reductions can be achieved by using double
seal technology.   This consists of installing a second seal (secondary)
over the single shoe or resilient type seal (primary).  Limited test
data indicate that losses with tight secondary and tight primary resilient
type seals are 10 to 25 percent of the loss with a tight primary only.,
Double seal technology will not eliminate the need for frequent maintenance
and inspection programs.
Cost of Control
      Since most gasoline and crude oil storage tanks already are equipped
with single seals, the cost of control will be limited to the additional
cost for installing a secondary seal on new tanks or the cost of retro-
fitting existing tanks.  Retrofit will be more costly.
      Secondary seals cost about $16 per linear foot installed for retrofit
applications.   For a tank 200 feet in diameter and 44 feet high with a
capacity of 250,000 barrels the capital cost to retrofit a secondary seal
is $9,800 and the annualized cost $3,000 per year excluding value of the
recovered product.  The total capital cost of a floating roof tank with a

-------
primary seal installed at an East Coast location is $9.80 per barrel
or $2,450,000.    Emission reduction and hence cost effectiveness of secondary
seals over and above primary seals will vary with the wind velocity and  the
true vapor pressure of the stored product.   This is illustrated in the
table below.

Hydrocarbon emission
reduction, metric tons/yr
Value3of hydrocarbon
saved
Annual cost to retrofit
minus saving
Cost of emissions
controlled, $/metric ton
4 MPH
3.0 psia
3.6
$400
$2,600
$722
1
6.0 psia
7.2
$800
$2,200
$305
8 MPH
3.0 psia 6.0 psia
10.9 21.8
$1,200 $2,300
$1 ,800 $700
$165 $ 32
 Wind velocity, miles per hour.
2
 Vapor pressure of stored liquid product, pounds per square inch absolute.
3
 Value of recovered hydrocarbons is assumed to be $110 per metric ton.

References
     1.  American Petroleum Institute Bulletin 2517, "Evaporation Loss
from Floating Roof Tanks," February, 1962.
     2.  "Control of Hydrocarbon Emissions from Petroleum Liquids,"
EPA-600/2-75-042, September, 1975.
     3.  "Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary
Sources - Volume I: Control Methods for Surface-Coating Operations,"
EPA-450/2-76-028, November, 1976.
     4.  "SOHIO/CBI Floating Roof Emissions Program, Interim Report,"
October 7, 1976; "SOHIO/CBIFloating Roof Emissions Program, Final
Report," November 18, 1976.
                                    3

-------
     5.  Personal Communication with Manufacturers and Fabricators, May,.
1977.
     6.  "Petroleum Storage Capacity for National  Security," draft report,
National Petroleum Council, August 6, 1975.

-------
                  TANK TRUCK GASOLINE LOADING  TERMINALS

Process Description
     Motor gasoline produced at petroleum refineries  is  transferred  primarily
by pipeline, ship or barge to intermediate storage at loading terminals.
Various grades of gasoline are dispensed through loading facilities  into
tank trucks.  From terminals the gasoline is delivered to bulk plants  or
to commercial or retail accounts (service stations).   It is estimated  that.
there are approximately 2000 tank truck gasoline loading terminals in  the
United States.  At uncontrolled terminals the truck compartments are
vented to the atmosphere during loading operations.
Base Line Emissions
     Base line (uncontrolled) emissions of hydrocarbon nationwide from
tank truck  gasoline loading terminal operations are estimated to be
300,000 metric tons per year, assuming an emission factor of 1 kilogram
per liter (kg/1) and a national throughput of 1065 million liters per
day (1/d).1  This  represents 1.8 percent of the estimated 1975 national
                                              2
hydrocarbon  emissions  from stationary sources.   Based on sparse data,
it is estimated that 25 percent of 2000 tank truck gasoline loading
terminals are controlled  to some degree.
Control Techno!ogy
     Control technology utilized to minimize emissions during tank truck
gasoline loading include: 1) top-submerged or bottom  loading of gasoline
(58 percent  efficient); 2) vapor recovery equipment  (93+ percent efficient);
and 3) thermal oxidation  (99+ percent efficient).  A  well designed vapor
recovery system will reduce the hydrocarbon concentration of exhaust gases
to less than 5 percent by volume.   In a thermal oxidizer system if a firebox
temperature  of 760°C or greater is maintained,  a  99+  percent efficiency for
the unit would be  anticipated.

-------
     When vapor recovery or incineration are used, precautions should
be taken to ensure that there are no leaks from the trucks and vapor
collection equipment during loading.  Leaks can be monitored with portable
hydrocarbon detectors.  Hatches and pressure relief valves on trucks and all
valves and connections leading to the vapor control device should be
monitored.  An emission level of 80 milligrams per liter (mg/1) of
gasoline loaded can be achieved with a vapor recovery system and
27 mg/1 with an oxidation system provided good leak prevention is
maintained.  Emission levels with bottom fill or top-submerged fill
will be approximately 610 mg/1.   Approximately 300 terminals have
been equipped with vapor control equipment; most have retrofitted
vapor recovery systems to existing facilities.  It is estimated that
10 facilities are equipped with thermal oxidizers.

Energy Requirements
     The energy requirements for top-submerged or bottom fill are minimal.
When vapor recovery is used, the energy required to operate the recovery
system is more than offset by the increased gasoline recovery.  Thermal
oxidizers have about the same energy requirements as vapor recovery
systems, but there is no offsetting credit for product recovery.  Terminals
rarely can utilize waste heat from incinerators.

Cost of Control
     Estimated capital costs to retrofit an existing top-splash fill,
950,000 1/d terminal, are estimated to be $1500 where simple drop tubes
are installed at two racks (with 3 loading arms per rack); $194,000
for converting the two loading racks and the trucks from top-splash

-------
loading to bottom loading; plus an additional $141,000 for thermal
oxidizers or $205,000 where vapor recovery is installed.  Estimated
annual direct operating costs are negligible for drop tubes or bottom
loading.  Estimated annual direct operating costs range from $5,500
per year for thermal oxidizers to $8,000 per year for vapor recovery
systems.  For a 950,000 1/d terminal with vapor recovery with 100
percent recovery of vapors from the tank truck, an estimated annual
credit of $48,700 for recovered gasoline would be realized.   The
estimated cost effectiveness of a 950,000 1/d terminal converted to
bottom-fill loading with refrigeration type vapor recovery approximates
$0.18 kilogram of hydrocarbon controlled.

References
     1.  "Control of Hydrocarbon Emissions from Petroleum Liquids,"
EPA-600/2-75-042, September 1975.
     2.  "Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary
Sources - Volume I:  Control Methods for Surface Coating Operations,"
EPA-450/2-76-028, November 1976.
     3.  "Control of Hydrocarbon from Tank Truck Gasoline Loading
Terminals," EPA guideline document in preparation to be released
in 1977.

-------
                          BULK GASOLINE PLANTS

process Description
      Bulk gasoline plants are typically secondary distribution facilities
which  receive  gasoline  by large tank trucks, and subsequently distribute
it via small tank trucks to farms, businesses, and service stations.  A
typical bulk plant has  three fixed roof storage tanks with a total storage
capacity of 185,000  liters and an average daily throughput of 75,700 liters.1
In 1972 there  were -approximately 23,000 bulk plants in the U.S.; the number
.declined- by ,11.3 percent from 1967 to 1972.2
Base  Line ;Emisston.s
      Hydrocarbon vapors are emitted to the atmosphere during filling of
storage tanks  and loading of tank trucks.  Additionally, breathing losses
occur at storage tanks.  The estimated nationwide uncontrolled emission from
bulk  plants is ,146,000-metric tons per year (68,000 metric ton's per year
from  tank truck loading losses and 78,000 metric tons per year from storage
                                   2
tank  breathing and working losses).   Emissions from bulk plants contributed
to about 0.8 percent of the total 1975 National hydrocarbon emissions from
                   4
stationary sources.
Control Technology
     Vapor control techniques currently in use at bulk plants include:
top-submerged  fill, bottom fill, and vapor balance.   Bottom and top-
submerged loading can reduce truck loading emissions by 58 percent, and
can be retrofitted to existing racks and tank trucks.  Probably the only
vapor control  system currently in use is .the vapor balance system.  Tests
on two vapor balance systems indicate that they can achieve 90 to 100 percent
             5
efficiencies.   Although condensation, adsorption, and incineration systems
are commonly used in controlling gasoline bulk terminal  emissions, they
                                    8

-------
have not been installed at bulk plants because of their high cos-ts.
No technical impediments prevent their use at bulk plants.
     Vapor leakage from tank truck hatch seals, piping connections,  and
pressure-relief valves will result in low vapor recovery efficiencies for
balance systems.  It is particularly important that the tank truck hatches
be tightly sealed during all transfer operations.  The overall  effective-
ness of vapor balance systems will depend on efficient recovery or
destruction of the vapor collected in the bulk plant delivery truck at
the bulk terminal.  If bulk terminals are not equipped with vapor recovery
or incineration systems there will be some loss in efficiency.
Cost of Control
     For an existing 75,700 liters per day top-splash fill  bulk gasoline
plant the estimated capital cost of conversion for top-submerged fill is
$640 or $71,800 for bottom fill.  The approximate annualized cost for
conversion from top-splash to bottom fill is $8,900 or $270 per metric
ton of hydrocarbon recovered.  Conversion from top-splash to top-submerged
fill will result in an annualized.credit of $4,800 or $120 per metric ton
of recovered hydrocarbon.
     The capital and annualized costs of installing a vapor balance control
system at an existing 75,700 liters per day plant are $47,100 and $1,410
respectively.  The cost-effectiveness of a vapor balance system is $179
per metric ton of HC controlled for plants using top-splash and $470 per
metric ton of HC controlled for plants using bottom or top-submerged fill.
References
     1.  "Study of Gasoline Vapor Emission Controls at Small Bulk Plants,"
EPA 68-01-3156, October, 1976.

-------
     2.  U. S. Department.of Commerce,  Bureau of Census,  1972 Census  of
Wholesale Trade, subject series, "Petroleum Bulk Stations and Terminals,"
#WL 72-5-2, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
     3.  "Control of Hydrocarbon Emissions from Petroleum Liquids,"
EPA-600/2-75-042, September, 1975.
     4.  "Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary
Sources - Volume I: Control  Methods for Surface-Coating Operations,"
EPA-450/2-76-028, November,  1976.
     5.  "Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Bulk Gasoline Plants,"
EPA guideline document in preparation to be released in 1977.
                                    10

-------
                       GASOLINE SERVICE STATIONS
                        UNDERGROUND TANK LOADING

Process Description
     There are two major emission sources in gasoline service stations;
the loading of gasoline into underground storage tanks (Stage I) and the
fueling of vehicles (Stage II).  In both cases, gasoline vapor is displaced
from the tanks by the incoming liquid.   A lesser source is breathing losses
in storage tanks.

Base Line Emissions
     Emissions vary with filling rate, filling method, Reid vapor pressure,
and system temperatures.  Based on an estimated loss of 1.1 grams per liter*
(g/1) of gasoline loaded, national emissions from loading underground tanks
at service stations are 400,000 metric tons per year or 2.3 percent of total
stationary source emissions in the United States.  An additional 0.1 g/1
of vapor is lost through breathing vents in underground tanks.  This adds
42,000 tons per year bringing the total emissions from the storage tanks
to 442,000 tons per year or 2.6 percent of.stationary source emissions.

Control Technology
     Stage I losses can be reduced significantly by returning the displaced
vapors from underground storage tanks to the delivery tank truck.  The
collected vapors are displaced to a vapor recovery system at the bulk
terminal when the truck tanks are filled.  Thus, vapors from service
station storage tanks are ultimately controlled at the terminal.  The
"vapor balance system" itself (vapor return hose from service station
*Submerged fill = 0.88 gram per liter, splash fill = 1.4 grams per liter.
                                   11

-------
underground storage tanks to tank truck compartments and a submerged
fill pipe to reduce vapor generation) is 93 to 100 percent efficient
in controlling working losses.   The effectiveness of the system is
reduced considerably if leaks exist in the vapor collection lines
or in the truck tanks or if the truck hatches are not tightly sealed
while in transit.
     Fifteen air quality control regions have implemented this control
strategy (Stage I) in service stations.   No devices are used specifically
to control breathing losses, however, where Stage II control systems are
employed (balance underground tanks and vehicle tank) breathing losses
are greatly reduced.
Cost of Control
     Stage I capital costs have been estimated at $1900 per station made
up as follows:
                    Drop tubes, vent valves     -  $ 300-500
                    Installation                -  $ 100
                    Trenching, backfill
                      paving                    -  $1,300-1,600
     Operating costs are insignificant.   For a typical  service station
dispensing about 227,000 liters (60,000  gallons) of gasoline per month,
the cost effectiveness of a Stage I is estimated to be a credit of $77
per  metric ton of gasoline recovered.
     These do not include minor costs associated with conversion of trucks
to balance systems.  They do, however, include trenching and backfill
paving costs which could be associated with Stage II controls.
                                  12

-------
References
     1.   "Revision of Evaporative Hydrocarbon Emissions Factors,"
Radian Corporation for EPA-OAQPS, EPA-450/3-76-039, August 1976.
     2.   "Control of Hydrocarbon Emissions from Petroleum Liquids,"
Radian Corporation for EPA-IERL, EPA-600/2-75-042, September 1975.
     3.   "A Study of Vapor Control Methods for Gasoline Marketing
Operations," Volume I and II, Radian Corporation for EPA-OAQPS,
EPA-450/3-75-046 a and b, April 1975.
                                   13

-------
                     GASOLINE TANK TRUCKS  IN TRANSIT

Process Description
     Motor gasoline is loaded into tank trucks  for distribution  to  bulk
plants, commercial accounts, and retail  service stations.   During transit
on the return trip from the site of the gasoline drop to  the terminal,
open or leaking hatches, connections,  or pressure-vacuum  valves  can cause
the loss of hydrocarbon vapors.

Base Line Emissions
     Base line (uncontrolled) emissions nationwide from tank truck  hatch
covers are estimated to be 45 to 90 metric tons per year.   This  estimate
is based on a volume of 1065 million liters per day of gasoline  transported
in tank trucks;  the vapors in the truck being  saturated;  and a  gross
estimate of 10 to 20 percent loss of the vapor  during transit.   EPA source
tests indicate that a large loss of vapor  from  tank trucks has occurred
in many instances prior to gasoline loading operations.  These losses  are
0.25 to 0.5 percent of the estimated 1975  national hydrocarbon emissions
from stationary sources and 4.0 to 8.0 percent  of the emissions  from
                       2
transportation sources.

Control Technology
     The installation and maintenance of effective hatch  seals and  pressure-
vacuum vents and ensuring that the hatches are  shut and locked prior to
transit is all that is required to virtually eliminate the estimated 45  to
90 metric tons or more of hydrocarbon currently being emitted.   There will
still be some emission, however, due to the effect of diurnal temperature
changes on truck compartments causing venting through relief valves to the
atmosphere.
                                   14

-------
Cost of Control
     The cost of control will be limited to the cost of installing and
maintaining effective seals, connections, and pressure-vacuum valves.
This cost is considered to be minimal compared to the value of the product.
recovered.
References
     1.  "Control of Hydrocarbon Emissions from Petroleum Liquids,"
EPA-600/2-75-042, September, 1975.
     2.  "Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Stationary Sources
Volume I:  Control Methods for Surface-Coating Operations," EPA-450/2-76-028,
November, 1976.
                                     15

-------
               LEAKS FROM MISCELLANEOUS  REFINERY  SOURCES

Process Description
     Petroleum refining is the third largest industry  in  the United  States
and presents a potential hydrocarbon (HC)  emission  problem by virtue of
the large quantities of petroleum liquid refined  and the  intricacy of the
refining process.  There are 266 refineries  currently  operating  in the
United States.  Refineries process crude oil  through fractionation,
decomposition, rebuilding and rearrangement,  extraction,  and product
finishing into over 2500 products.

Base Line Emissions
     Miscellaneous sources of HC emissions that are considered here
include:  (1) pipeline valves, flanges,  and  other connections, (2) pump
and compressor seals, (3) pressure relief devices,  and (4) sampling
systems.
     Based on January 1, 1977, refinery  capacity  the  hydrocarbon
emissions from the refinery sources listed above  are estimated to
                                          2
amount to over 160,000 metric tons per year   or about  one percent of
the stationary source hydrocarbon emissions.   These estimates are
based on data obtained by the Los Angeles County  Joint Study of
                                               34
petroleum refinery emissions in the late 1950's  and EPA  studies.

Control Technology
     Controls for refinery hydrocarbon emissions  fall  into two categories,
equipment specifications and monitoring  techniques. Proper equipment must
be installed and kept in good working order  by a  regular  leak detection
                                   16

-------
and maintenance program.  A component is considered to be in good working
order if there is no hydrocarbon concentration above 100 ppm as hexane
at 5 centimeters from the surface.
     There should be a daily unit area walkthrough inspection to locate
leaks.  When the ambient hydrocarbon concentration anywhere within the ;
unit area is over 20 ppm, there is probably a leak present in the unit.
The component causing the elevated concentration should be located and <
should be repaired if it exceeds the 100 ppm level.
     In addition to the daily unit area monitoring, certain components
should be individually checked for leaks and certain components should
have specified control equipment installed.  The pipeline valves should
be individually checked for leaks monthly.  Rotating pumps and compressors
should be fitted with mechanical seals when possible, and all pumps and
compressors should be checked for leaks daily.  Pressure relief valves
should either be vented to the flare header system, protected by a rupture
disc, or inspected monthly.  Sampling equipment should be checked daily
for leaks.  It is estimated that implementation of this program would
reduce hydrocarbon emissions from these sources by 91 percent to 14,000
                     2
metric tons per year.
                                  17

-------
Cost of Control
     Since the control equipment discussed above is presently being
operated in several refineries, it appears the controls are justifiable
either in terms of cost-benefit for recovered product or safety.  It
is also felt that the cost of the additional instrumentation and personnel
needed to implement the leak detection and maintenance plan will be
appreciably offset by savings from product recovery.  Therefore, no
rigorous cost-benefit analysis has been developed since the cost impact
will be minimal.

References
     1. "Annual Refining Survey," The Oil and Gas Journal, March 28,
1977.
     2.  "Control of Hydrocarbon Emissions from Miscellaneous Refinery
                                  •»                 ••»      •••••..
Sources," EPA guideline document in preparation to be released in 1977.
     3. "Joint District, Federal and State Project for the Evaluation of
Refinery Emissions," Los Angeles County Air Pollution Control District,
Nine reports 1957-1958.
     4,  U. S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, MDAD-
MRB, "National Air Quality and Emission Trends Report 1975," EPA-450/1-
76-002, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina  27711, November 1976.
                                  18

-------
            REFINERY PROCESS DRAINS AND WASTEWATER SEPARATORS

Process Description
     Petroleum refineries generate large quantities of process wastewater.
Depending on many factors, a refinery may generate up to one barrel  of
wastewater for every barrel of crude oil throughput.  Process wastewater
originates from several sources in petroleum refineries including, but not
limited to, crude desalting, leaks, spills, pump and compressor seal cooling
and flushing/sampling, and equipment cleaning.  Contaminated wastewater is
collected in the process drain system and directed to the refinery treat-
ment system where oil is skimmed in a separator and the wastewater undergoes
additional treatment as required.

Base Line Emissions
     The nationwide hydrocarbon emissions from petroleum refinery process
drains and wastewater separators are estimated to be 295,000 metric tons
per year  based on January 1, 1977, throughput of 2.69 million cubic meters
                     2
of crude oil per day.   This is approximately 1.6 percent of the nationwide
                                            3
stationary source emissions of hydrocarbons.

Control Technology
     Controls for refinery process drains and wastewater separators consist
of 1) the refinery operator should perform a monthly monitoring program
for detection of hydrocarbon concentrations above 100 ppm as hexane at
5 centimeters.from the process drains and wastewater separators and 2) floatin
roof covers for all forebays and all initial wastewater separators.   The
monitoring program is necessary to ensure that no excess hydrocarbons have
been released into the drain system and that all hatches remain closed

                                    19

-------
 when not in use.  The covers are necessary to ensure that the volatile
 hydrocarbons are returned to the system (crude desalter unit usually)
 before they can evaporate to the atmosphere.  Application of these controls
 will result in an estimated 90 percent reduction in emissions from these
 sources.
      There are important considerations that need to be taken into account
 when covering a wastewater separator.  When using a floating roof cover,
 care must;be taken'to ensure that the cover'wilV'not interfere with the
••operation of the oil skimmer.  Fixed roof covers can have a vapor space
 between the cover>and the liquid surface,  this vapor space may constitute
 an explosion hazard unless it is gas-blanketed with hydrocarbon or nitrogen
                 -     ;4
-and vented to a flare.

 Cost -of Control
      The H976'•estimates'for-cos4:-e^
 separators -by installing flo'ati rig* roof -covers 'for the forebay and main
 separator are a cre:dit of $70.48 and $79.73 per metric ton of emissions
                                                                            45
 reduced .for a 9850 and a 31,800 cubic meter per day refinery, respectively.  '
 The cost of the portable hydrocarbon analy'zier needed for the monitoring
 .program "should'range from $800 to $4000 each, depending on the type of
 instrument used.  Although'no rigorous cost-effectiveness analysis has been
 •performed for the 'Teak detection plan, it is felt that the costs will be
 appreciably off-set ;by savings from-product recovery.
 References
      1.  "Control of Hydrocarbon Emissions  from Miscellaneous Refinery
 Sources," EPA guideline document in preparation to be released in 1977.
                                   20

-------
     2.  Annual ;Refining Survey, The Oil  and Gas Journal,  March 28,  1977.
     3.  U. S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards,  MDAD-MRB,
"National Air Quality and Emission Trends Report 1975," EPA-450/1-76-002,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina  27711, November 1976.
     4.  "Hydrocarbon Emissions from Refineries," Committee on Refinery
Environmental Control, American Petroleum Institute Publication No.  928,
July 1973.
     5.  "Economic Impact of EPA's Regulations on the Petroleum Refining
Industry," U. S. EPA, Office of Planning and Evaluation, Report Number
230/3-76-004, April 1976.
                                    21

-------
                   REFINERY VACUUM PRODUCING SYSTEMS

Process Description
     Bottoms from the atmospheric distillation tower can be further
fractionated if the temperature is increased and the pressure is lowered.
This is performed in the vacuum distillation tower.   Three types of vacuum
producing devices are  used to remove gases and vapor from the tower:   steam
jets with barometric condensers, steam jets with surface condensers, and
mechanical vacuum pumps.  The educted vapors and evaporation from the
accumulators or hot  wells(barometric condensers only) are potential
hydrocarbon emissions from refinery vacuum producing systems.

Base Line Emissions
     Based on January 1, 1977, refinery capacity (2.69 million cubic meters
                                                                     inc
                                                                      2
per day),   The hydrocarbon emissions from the refinery vacuum producing system!
are estimated to amount to approximately 127,000 metric tons per year.'
This is about 0.7 percent of the total stationary source hydrocarbon
emissions.
Control Technology
     The non-condensable gases should either be vented directly to a
combustion device or compressed and added to the refinery fuel gas system.
The hot wells and accumulators should be covered and vented to a combustion
device.  Implementation of these controls will result in negligible
emissions of hydrocarbon to the atmosphere.

Energy Requirements
     There will be an energy requirement for the non-condensable gas
compressor if one is used, but this requirement will more than be off-set
                                    22

-------
by the savings from the recovered hydrocarbons.   A 15,900 cubic meter per
day refinery will  recover the equivalent of 1300 cubic meters  of crude oil
per day.  Other energy requirements for the controls listed are minimal.
Cost of Control
     Estimates of the cost-effectiveness of compressing the non-condens-
ables and incinerating them in the nearest firebox are a credit of $31.16
per metric ton of hydrocarbon emissions reduced.   This is based on a
                                                      45
15,900 cubic meter per day refinery operating in  1973. '   This estimate
does not include the cost of a condensate receiver for a surface condenser
or the cost of covering the barometric hot well.
References
     1.  Annual  Refining Survey, The Oil and Gas Journal, March 28, 1977.
     2.  "Control of Hydrocarbon Emissions from Miscellaneous Refinery
Sources," EPA guideline document in preparation to be released in 1977.
     3.  U. S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, MDAD^MRB,
"National Air Quality and Emission Trends Report 1975," EPA-450/1-76-002,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, November 1976.
     4.  "Hydrocarbon Emissions from Refineries," Committee on Refinery
Environmental Control, American Petroleum Institute Publication No. 928,
July 1973.
     5.  "Economic Impact of EPA's Regulations on the Petroleum Refining
Industry," U. S. EPA, Office of Planning and Evaluation, Report Number
230/3-76-004, April, 1976.
                                   23

-------
                      REFINERY PROCESS UNIT TURNAROUND



Process Description


     Periodically every refinery processing unit must be shut down for


maintenance.  The shutting down, purging and restarting of a unit is


called a turnaround.  In short, when a unit is shut down, the hydrocarbon


liquids are pumped to storage and the hydrocarbon gases are purged from


the vessel.  It is then ventilated to provide a safe atmosphere for


workmen.  The emissions that occur as a result of the shutting down is


called blowdown.  Unit turnarounds occur every one to five years depending


on many factors.


Base Line Emissions


     The nationwide hydrocarbon emission estimate for refinery blowdown


systems is 450,000 metric tons per year,  based on January 1, 1977, capacity

                                                             2
of 2.69 million cubic meters of crude oil  throughput per day.   This is


approximately 2.5 percent of the total stationary source emissions of


hydrocarbons.


Control Technology


     Controls for refinery blowdown systems consist of combusting the


non-condensable vapors.  When the vessel is dep^essarized, the non-condensable


vapors can be--either added to tte refinery fye3vg3S."*a#stem or


the ^pressure in the vessel dropsK'fcelow that of;4$tetjlie1 gas


vapors are then combusted in the flare.  This should continue at l^ast


until the hydrocarbon concentration in the vessel drops below 10 percent


by  volume.  The vessel is then ventilated to atmosphere to allow maintenance


personnel to enter.  Application of these controls will result in emissions


of  2300 metric tons per year from process unit turnaround.
                                     24

-------
Cost of Control
     Since the control technology described above is presently being applied
in several refineries, it appears the controls are justifiable either in
terms of recovered product or refinery safety.  Piping costs are involved
with attaching some of the units to existing fuel gas and flare systems;
these costs should be minimal.
References
     1.  "Control of Hydrocarbon Emissions from Petroleum Liquids," U.  S.
EPA Report No. 600/2-75-042, September, 1975.
     2.  Annual Refining Survey, The Oil and Gas Journal, March 28, 1977.
     3.  U. S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, MDAD-MRB,
"National Air Quality and Emission Trends Report 1975," EPA-450/1-76-002,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, November, 1976.
                                   25

-------
       LEAKS FROM NATURAL GAS AND NATURAL GASOLINE PROCESSING PLANTS

Process Description
     Natural gas is produced in conjunction with crude oil, natural gas
liquids, water, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen sulfide.   The crude oil and
water are generally separated from the gases near the wellhead.   Gas free
crude and other liquids are stored for eventual  transfer to the refinery.
The remaining liquids and gases are sent to a gas plant where" the liquids,
hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide, and C2 to C,- hydrocarbons are separated
from methane before it is placed in the pipeline.  The emissions and
control techniques described below apply only to the natural gas and
natural gasoline plant not to any facilities between the wellhead and
the gas plant.
Base Line Emissions
     The nationwide hydrocarbon emission estimate for natural gas and
natural gasoline processing plants is 152,000 metric tons per year, based
on 1973 estimates of 1.86 billion normal cubic meters of production per
day.   This is about 0.9 percent of the total stationary source hydrocarbon
emissions.
Control Technology
     Oil-water separators, pump and compressor seals, pressure relief
devices, and pipeline valves and flanges are the sources of hydrocarbon
emissions.  These emissions occur as a result of leaks.  One of these
components is deemed to be leaking if there is a concentration of 100 ppm
hydrocarbon as hexane at a distance of 5 centimeters from the component.
The leaks will be minimized if the oil-water separators are covered,
mechanical seals are used on all rotating pumps and compressors, all
pressure relief devices are vented to flares or protected by rupture discs,
                                    26

-------
and if a regular program of leak detection and maintenance is followed.
The frequency with which each type of component should be individually
checked for leaks is 1) oil-water separators - monthly; 2) pump and
compressor seals - daily; 3) pressure relief devices - monthly; and
4) pipeline valves - monthly.  Also the ambient air concentrations should
be measured daily throughout the plant using a portable hydrocarbon
detector.  The source of any ambient hydrocarbon readings over 20 ppm
should be located and repaired if the source is in excess of the 100 ppm
level.  Application of the above controls will result in an estimated
91 percent reduction in hydrocarbon emissions from these sources.
Energy Requirements
     Implementation of these controls will have a minimum impact on energy
use and can result in an energy savings due to decreased losses of hydro-
carbon product.
Cost of Control
     Since the control equipment discussed above are presently being
applied in many plants, it appears the controls are justifiable either in
terms of cost-benefit for recovered product or refinery safety.  Even
though additional instrumentation and personnel may be needed to implement
the leak detection and maintenance plan, these costs will be off-set by
savings from product recovery.  The cost of a portable hydrocarbon detector
should range from $800 to $4000 each, depending on the type of instrument
used.  Therefore no rigorous cost-benefit analysis has been developed
since the cost impact will be minimal.
References
     1.  "Control of Hydrocarbon Emissions from Petroleum Liquids" U. S.
EPA Report No. 600/2-75-042, September, 1975.
                                    27

-------
     2.  U.  S.  EPA, Office.of Air Quality Planning and Standards,  MDAD-MRB,
"National Air Quality and Emission Trends Report 1975," EPA-450/1-76-002,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina  27711,  November, 1976.
     3.  "Control of Hydrocarbon Emissions from Miscellaneous  Refinery
Sources," EPA guideline document in preparation to be released in  1977.
                                   28

-------
               LEAKS FROM OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION FIELDS

Process Description
     In a producing oil  well, there are three basic methods of bringing
the oil to the surface:   natural  flow, steam or water lifting (injection
of steam or water into the well), and pumpiag.  Oil and gas production
                                                 i.
operations include the separating and transferring of oil  and gas.   The
production from each well is sent to a gathering system Which consists
of the piping, valves, and fittings that are necessary to collect and
combine the production from the individual wells.
     Crude oil and natural gas liquids are produced in association with
gases and water which must then be treated to separate crude oil  from
gas and water.  The gas free crude and other petroleum liquids are
stored for eventual transfer to the refinery.  The gases are then piped
to a gas plant where any remaining liquid hydrocarbon, hydrogen sulfide.
carbon dioxide, and C2 to C5 hydrocarbons are separated before the methane
is placed in the pipeline.  The control techniques described below apply
to the well head equipment, heater treaters, separators, and the piping
and valves up to but not  including the gas plant.

Base Line Emissions
     Leaks from pump seals, compressor seals, relief valves, open crude
ponds, and pipeline valves are the source of  hydrocarbon emissions from
production fields.  The  nationwide hydrocarbon  emission estimate of
148,000 metric tons per  year1 for crude and gas  production  is  extremely
 rough.
                                  29

-------
Control Technology
     Effective control of potential  leaks requires a good detection and
maintenance program.  Any leak which exceeds 100 ppm at a distance of
                                               2
5 cm from the source would require maintenance.    All potential  leak
sources should be checked monthly with a portable hydrocarbon detector.
Ponds or other types of open crude storage should be eliminated  and
replaced by storage tanks.

Costs of Control
     The cost of the maintenance program is dependent on the size of the
field, the number of sources, and the degree of maintenance employed but
is not expected to be significant.  The hydrocarbon detector would cost
about $800 to $4,000.

References
     1.  "Control of Hydrocarbon Emissions from Petroleum Liquids,"
Radian Corporation.  September 1975.
     2.  "Control of Hydrocarbon Emissions from Miscellaneous Refinery
Sources," EPA guideline document in preparation to be released in 1977.
                                  30

-------
                         CUTBACK ASPHALT PAVING

Process Description
     Asphalt is a by-product of petroleum distillation (natural  or
manmade) which is used in many different paving applications.   Asphalts
take the form of asphalt cement (the residue of the distillation of
crude oils) and liquefied asphalts.  Liquefied asphalt is frequently
thinned with volatile petroleum distillates (cutbacks) such as naphtha
and kerosene.  Heat is used with cutbacks to facilitate spraying.  The
volatiles in cutback asphalts release hydrocarbons into the atmosphere
in amounts that vary according to the type of cutback.

Baseline Emissions
     The national hydrocarbon emission estimates from the use of cutback
asphalt paving products was 672,000 metric tons per year in 1975.

Control Technology
     The technology to control hydrocarbon emissions from these paving
operations consists of substituting emulsified asphalts in place  of
cutback asphalts.  Emulsified asphalts use water and non-volatile emulsifying
agents for liquefaction; virtually no pollutants are emitted during the
curing of emulsions.  Emulsified asphalts are used widely in the construction
and maintenance of pavements ranging from high traffic volume highways and
airports to  low-volume rural roads and city streets.  Emulsions have been
available since 1903 and used extensively since the 1930's.
                                   31

-------
Energy Requirements
     The substitution of emulsions for cutbacks could save almost 1.59
billion liters of petroleum distillate annually for use as or conversion to
fuels and eliminate the 672,000 metric tons  of hydrocarbons  currently
being emitted to the atmosphere.  Also, much of the energy required  to
heat the cutbacks would be saved.

Environmental Considerations
     There are no adverse environmental  effects  associated  with the
substitution of emulsified asphalt for cutback asphalt.

Costs of Control
     The price difference between the two types of liquefied asphalt
concrete is insignificant.   Therefore, there is no control  cost
associated with the substitution.

Factors Which Affect Applicability - Emulsified asphalt can be substituted
for cutbacks in almost any application.  Some emulsified asphalts,  however,
usually are not used when rain is anticipated or when temperatures  fall
below 10°C.  Emulsified asphalt is not recommended for long-term stockpiling
(more than 3-4 weeks) whereas cutback asphalt can be stockpiled indefinitely.
The same construction equipment used for cutbacks can be used for emulsions.
A moderate amount of training (one or two days) is necessary to familiarize
operators with technology for employing emulsions.
                                  32

-------
References
     "Some Air Quality and Energy Conservation Considerations for the
Use of Emulsions to Replace Asphalt Cutbacks in Certain Paving Operations,"
Prepared by Francis M. Kirwan and Clarence Maday, U. S. Environmental
Protection Agency, March 1977, draft report.
                                  33

-------
                    COLD CLEANING WITH ORGANIC SOLVENTS

Process Description
     Cold cleaners are tanks of organic solvent used  for cleaning  or
degreasing metal  parts at or near room temperature.   Metal  parts
may be cleaned manually by spraying and brushing or automatically
by immersion into an agitated solvent bath.   Automotive  parts
cleaning and plant maintenance are normally  performed using cold
cleaning because it is inexpensive and there is no need  for the
cleanliness obtainable with vapor degreasing.   There  are an estimated
1,300,000 cold cleaners in operation in the  United States.

Base Line Emissions
     An estimated 360,000 metric tons of organic solvents were emitted
as a result of cold cleaning in 1974.  Evaporation of disposed waste
solvent accounted for over half of the total.   The solvents included
aliphatic (50 percent), halogenated (34 percent), aromatic  (10 percent),
and oxygenated (6 percent) organics.   Three-fourths of the  halogenated
solvent used were methyl chloroform, methylene chloride, and trichloro-
                          (g\
trifluoroethane (Freon 113^.  All three react very slowly  in  the  atmos-
phere yielding negligible oxidant.  However, because  of  their  chemical
stability, they pose a threat to the earth's ultraviolet shield  in that
they may deplete ozone in the stratosphere.

Control Technology
     Emission standards are not practical  because degreasing is  by nature
an open operation that prevents complete capture or measurement  of emissions,
                                  34

-------
Equipment and operating standards appear to be the only viable alternatives.
     Emission control is accomplished through both improved operating
practices and addition of control equipment.  The most important operating
improvements are:  (1) store and then dispose of or distill waste solvent
so as to minimize atmospheric evaporation, (2) close covers on cold cleaner
tanks whenever possible, and (3) drain cleaned parts sufficiently.  The
basic control equipment is the cover and a parts drainage facility.  These
should be standard on cold cleaners.  For cleaners using high volatility
solvents (greater than 33 mm Hg vapor pressure at 38°C), important
control devices are the water cover (for halogenated solvents) and a
high freeboard (the clearance as measured from the so-1 vent level to the
top of the cleaner).
     Controls on waste solvent disposal can reduce total cold cleaning
emissions by 10 to 40 percent; controls on direct emissions can reduce
emissions by an additional 10 to 30 percent, for a total  efficiency of
20 to 70 percent.

Energy Requirements
     No significant energy is consumed to control cold cleaners.  Distillatio
consumes approximately 0.3 kilowatt-hour per kilogram of waste solvent
compared to approximately 25 kilowatt-hours per kilogram required to
produce replacement solvent.

References
     1.  "Control of VOC from Organic Solvent Metal Cleaning Operations,"
EPA Guideline Document in preparation to be released in 1977.
                                  35

-------
     2.  "Study to Support New Source Performance Standards for Solvent
Metal Cleaning Operations," Dow Chemical Company, Prepared for EPA
under Contract No. 68-02-1329, Task No. 9.
                                   36

-------
         Control Cos!ts
                                 Typical Retrofit Cases
  Solvent Used
 Control Devices
Capital   Annualized
 Cost    Cost (Credit)
 ($)        ($/yr)
             Cost (Credit)     Emissit
             Effectiveness     Reducti
           ($/kg controlled)    (kg/y»
Low Volatility     Drainage Facility
(Mineral Spirits)
                     25
              0.5
              0.3-(0.07)
                    25
High Volatility
(e.g. blended
solvent with
60% methyl
chloroform)
Drainage Facility,
Mechanically
assisted cover
  65
(25)
(0.08)-(0.3)
100
                                              37

-------
                            VAPOR DECREASING

Process Description
     A vapor degreaser is a tank in which  metal  parts  are cleansed
by the washing action of condensing solvent.   Vapors are contained within
the tank by means of cooling coils near the top.   Only non-flanmable
halogenated solvents are employed in vapor degreasers.   The cleaning
process may be assisted by spraying or by  immersion into the boiling
liquid solvent.  Open top vapor degreasers are by definition open and
are batch loaded; conveyorized degreasers  are enclosed and are
continuously loaded.  The most recent estimates indicate that there
are about 4000 conveyorized and 22,000 open top vapor  degreasers  in
operation in the United States.

Base Line Emissions
     In 1974, vapor degreasing operations  resulted in  approximately
300,000 metric tons of organic solvent emissions.  One-third came
from conveyorized and two-thirds from open top degreasing.
     Halogenated organics are always used  for vapor degreasing because
of non-flammability and high vapor density.  In decreasing order  of
usage, the predominant solvents are trichloroethylene, 1,1,1 trichloro-
ethane (methyl chloroform), perchloroethylene, trichlorotrifluoroethane
(Freon 113^ and methylene chloride.
Control Technology
     For most vapor degreasers, it is difficult or impossible to  measure
emissions directly.  Furthermore, emissions tend to vary widely depending
upon the type of parts being degreased, solvents and operating practices.
                                   38

-------
Thus, losses do not necessarily reflect the degree of control  being
exercised.  For these reasons, equipment and operating standards appear
to be the most viable control approaches.
     Open Top Vapor Degreasers - Organic emission reductions are
accomplished through both improved operating practices and installation
of control equipment.  The ten most effective operating practice improve-
ments are:  (1) keep cover closed whenever possible, (2) minimize solvent
carry-out by proper parts racking, convey parts at less than 3.3 meters
per second, cook work loads for at least 30 seconds and dry for at least
15 seconds, (3) do not degrease porous materials, (4) do not process  work
loads that occupy more than 50 percent of the horizontal open area,
(5) do not let the vapor level drop more than 10 centimeters below
normal, (6) do not spray above the vapor level, (7) repair leaks
immediately, (8) store and then dispose of or distill waste solvent
so as to minimize atmospheric evaporation, (9) maintain exhaust
ventilation below 20 meters per minute per square meter of air/vapor
interface, and (10) ensure that the water separator operates properly.
     Control equipment and features which reduce emissions are covers,
safety switches, .increased freeboard, refrigerated chillers, enclosed
design and carbon adsorbers.  A complete control system would include
the first two devices and one of the last three.
     Covers may be manually operated, mechanically assisted, powered
or automated, but the crucial factor is that they be convenient to operate.
Safety switches should be designed to cut off the spray if the vapor
level drops too low, and to cut off the sump heater if the sump overheats
                                   39

-------
or the cooling coils cease functioning.   A minimum freeboard ratio
(freeboard height divided by degreaser width) of at least 0.5 is
recommended by degreaser manufacturers,  but it should be as large
as possible consistent with ease of inserting and removing parts.
Refrigerated chillers cool the air immediately above the vapor zone
to impede outward diffusion and convection of vapors.  An enclosed
design keeps the cover closed at all  times except when dry parts are
actually entering or exiting the degreaser.   Carbon adsorption systems
are effective organic vapor control devices but are limited in degreasing
by the difficulty in capturing fugitive emissions.
     Use of all ten operating practices  may reduce emissions by 20 to
40 percent; the control equipment and design features may reduce them
by an additional 30 to 60 percent, for an overall efficiency of 45 to
75 percent.
     Conveyorized Degreasers - For control of conveyorized units, the
most effective operating practices are:   (1) repair leaks immediately,
(2) store and then dispose of or distill waste solvent so as to minimize
atmospheric evaporation, (3) maintain exhaust ventilation below 20 meters
per minute per square meter of air/vapor interface, (4) ensure that the
water separator operates properly, (5) minimize solvent carry-out by
proper parts racking, and (6) convey parts at less than 3.3 meters per
second.
     Control equipment and features which reduce emissions are safety
switches, refrigerated chillers, carbon adsorption, minimized conveyor
openings and downtime cover.  Safety switches, refrigerated chillers,
and carbon adsorption were discussed earlier.  The entrance and exit
                                  40

-------
opening for conveyed parts should, be as small as possible to minimize
vapor escape; all openings should be covered during shut down to
prevent vapors from escaping.
     A complete control system for a conveyorized unit with all of the
devices listed, i.e., chiller or adsorber (but not both), will  reduce
VOC emissions by 50 to 70 percent.
Energy Requirements
     Carbon adsorption requires energy, usually in the form of steam
for desorption.  The steam requirement is typically 5 kilowatt-hours
per kilogram solvent recovered.  This energy expenditure is more than
offset since production of replacement solvent consumes about 25 kilowatt-
hours per kilogram.

References
      1.   "Control  of VOC  from  Organic Solvent Metal Cleaning Operations,"
OAQPS guideline  document  to  be released  in 1977.
      2.   "Study  to Support New Source Performance Standards for Solvent
Metal Cleaning Operations,"  Dow Chemical, prepared for EPA under contract
no. 68-02-1329,  Task No.  9.
                                   41

-------
     Control  Costs (retrofitted)
                                              Major  Control  Device  Option
For Typical Open Top Vapor
Degreaser: (1.67 m2 area)
Capital Costs ($)
Avg. Annual i zed Cost
.Manual
Cover
300
(800)
Freeboard
& Powered
Cover
8000
310
Re frig.
Chiller
6500
85
Enclosed
Design
16,000
35
Carbon
Adsorption
10,300
800
      (Credit)($/yr)

     Cost (Credit) Effectiveness  (0.4)
      ($/kg controlled)

     Emission Reduction (metric    1.1-3
      ton/yr)
               0.4-(0.04) 0.03-(0.1) 0.2-(0.1)   0.5-0.06
                1.7-3.8    2.3-4.2    6.1-4.2     2.3-4.6
For typical Conveyprized
Degreasers: (3.8 n£ vapor
area)
       Monorail  Deg.
  Adsorber       Chiller
                    Cross-Rod Deg.
               Adsorber        Chiller
Capital Cost ($)

Avg. Annualized Cost
 (Credit) ($/yr)

Cost (Credit)
 Effectiveness
 ($/kg controlled)

Emission Reduction
 (ton/yr)
   17,600

   (1,600)
 8,600

(3,700)
17,600

(1,500)
7,500

(650)
(0.03)-(0.19)   (0.24)-(0.32)   (0.53)-(0.14)   (0.016)-(0.19)
   10-17
10-17
 4-7
 4-7
                                         42

-------
                                 GRAPHIC ARTS
                       ROTOGRAVURE PRINTING OPERATIONS

Process Description
     In the gravure method of printing, the very fluid inks fill  the recessed
image areas, excess ink is wiped off by a doctor knife, the image is trans-
ferred directly to the paper or other substrate and the product is dried.
When the paper is fed from a roll, the process is known as rotogravure.
Since sheet-fed gravure is slow, it is little used and is not included in
this subject category.

Base Line Emissions
     The emission from rotogravure presses are estimated to be 140,000
metric tons per year.

Control Technology
     Carbon adsorption has been successfully used at several large publication
                   2
rotogravure plants.   Overall recovery efficiency is about 90 percent, giving
an emission level of 0.05 kilograms per liter of ink.
     Packaging and specialty gravure printers use a wide range of solvents
                                           2
depending upon the substrate to be printed.   Carbon adsorption may be more
expensive for such operations because of the difficulty or impossibility of
reusing the recovered solvents.  Fume incineration has been used in a few
instances.   Overall efficiency is 85 to 90 percent with a resultant emission
level of 0.07 kilograms per liter of ink.  Although water-borne inks are used
                                    43

-------
for certain specialties, they are not available for all  uses.

Cost of Control
     The cost of carbon adsorption units ranges from $170,000  for a
single press plant to over $1,000,000 for a large publication  printing
plant.  Annual costs, without solvent reuse, are $70,000 and $520,000
or $250 and $120 per metric ton of solvent controlled for a small and
large plant respectively.  With solvent reuse, a profit would  be assured
since rotogravure ink solvents cost about 10 cents per kilogram.  Additional
details on costs are given in Reference 3.
     Installed costs of incinerators without heat recovery range from
$100,000 for a small (2.4 Nm3/s) plant to $325,000 for a large (43 Nm3/s)
plant.3  Annual costs would be about $100,000 and $1,000,000,  respectively,
or $275 and $185 per ton.  With primary and secondary heat recovery,
installed costs would be $140,000 and $500,000 respectively.  Annual costs
would be $34iOOO and $220,000, respectively, or $120 and $40 per ton.
More details on incinerator costs are given in Reference 3.

References
     1-.  Gadomskii R. R., et. al., "Evaluations of Emissions and Control
Technologies in the Graphic Arts Industries, Phase I," Graphic Arts
Technical Institute, August 1970.
     2.  "Environmental Aspects of Chemical Use in Printing Operations,"
EPA-560/1-75-005, Office of Toxic Substances, U. S. Environmental
Protection Agency, January 1976.
     3.  "Control of Volatile Organic Emissions From Existing Stationary
Sources - Volume I:  Control Methods for Surface Coating Operations,"
EPA-450/2-76-028, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, November 1976.
                                 44

-------
                              GRAPHIC ARTS   ;
                      WEB-OFFSET PRINTING OPERATIONS

Process Description                          ;
     In offset lithography, the printing and non-printing areas of the
image carrier are on the same plane.  The image areas are sensitized so
as to be ink wettable and water repellent.  The image is first transferred
to a rubber covered roll (called a blanket) and hence is transferred to
the paper.  The image carrier is thus "offset"  from the substrate.  The
paper is fed to the press from a roll and forms a continuous "web" as it
travels through the printing and drying operations.

Base Line Emissions
     It is estimated that web-offset presses emit 100,000 metric tons per
year of VOC.]'2

Control Technology
     A number of direct flame incinerators have been installed to control
emissions from web-offset dryers.  Nineteen test reports show an average
                         3
efficiency of 95 percent.   Conventional inks average about 45 percent
organic solvent by volume, and contain 0.36 kilgrams  per liter.  Allowing
for a slight loss of capture, overall efficiency is 90 percent, equivalent
to an emission level of 0.036 kilograms per liter of ink used.
     Eight test reports on catalytic incinerators averaged 89 percent
efficiency.  Allowing for a slight lack of capture, overall efficiency is
85 percent.  Achievable emission level is 0.054 kilograms per liter of
ink.
                                  45

-------
     Ultraviolet curing inks eliminate the use of solvent.   The vehicle
of the ink consists entirely of monomers and prepolymers which polymerize
under the influence of heat and a catalyst.  Since time and temperature
requirements are about the same as for drying conventional  ink, conventional
dryers can be used.  The inks contain some organic solvent, averaging
                                                             a
about 15 percent of the solvent content of conventional inks.   Emission
rates are about 0.054 kilograms of VOC per liter of  ink.
     A carbon adsorption system has been used in one web-offset printing
plant.  Conventional heat-set inks are used, averaging about 45 percent
solvent.  Overall-recovery efficiency is about 90 percent,equivalent to
an  emission level of about 0.036 kilograms per liter of ink used.

Cost of Control
     The costs of incineration for web-offset presses are the same as
those cited for rotogravure printing.  Additional details on costs are
given in Reference 5.
     In Reference 5, page 262, it is estimated that ultraviolet curing inks
cost two or three times as much as conventional inks.  The cost of hardware
to replace the existing oven is considerable, but no specific figures are
available.  However, the cost of operating a UV unit is less than the fuel
cost of a conventional oven.
     The cost of heat-reactive inks is reported to be 140-200 percent of the
                          5
     of conventional inks.   Sim
is no additional equipment cost.
                          5
cost of conventional inks.    Since conventional  ovens  can  be  used, there
                                   46

-------
     A carbon adsorption system controlling a web-offset printing plant
                                                             3   5
is reported to have a capital cost of 3.3 to 4.7 cents per Nm /s.
                                                           3
Presumably, installed cost would be 6.6 to 9.4 cents per Nm /s.  In the
desorption and recovery process in this system, electric heaters, vacuum
pumps, and refrigerated condensers are used.  The cost of conventional
systems using steam for desorption are given in Reference 4.

References
1.  Gadomski, R.R., et.al.."Evaluations of Emissions and Control
    Technologies in the Graphic Arts Industries, Phase I".  Graphic
    Arts Technical Institute, August 1970.
2.  Test Report Summaries.  Los Angeles County Zone, South Coast Air
    Quality Management District.  El Monte, California.
3.  Gadomski, R.R., et.al., "Evaluations of Emissions and Control
    Technologies in the Graphic Arts Industries, Phase II" Graphic Arts
    Technical Institute, May 1973.
4.  "Environmental Aspects of Chemical Use in Printing Operations."
    EPA-560/1-75-005.  Office of Toxic Substances, Environmental Protection
    Agency, January 1976.
5.  "Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources -
    Volume  I: Control Methods for Surface Coating Operations I1  EPA-450/2-76-02
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, November 1976.
                                   47

-------
                               GRAPHIC ARTS
                     WEB LETTERPRESS PRINTING OPERATIONS

Description of the Process
     In the letterpress method of printing, the image areas are raised
relative to the nonimage areas.  This is the original method of printing
with type.  Ink is applied to the image areas and transferred directly
to paper or other substrate.  The ink is viscous enough not to run into
the recessed (nonimage) areas.
     Letterpress printing can be divided into three categories.  Newspaper
printing ulitizes ink composed of petroleum oils and carbon black, but no
volatile solvent.  The ink "dries!l by absorption into the porous newsprint
paper.  Roll-fed (web) presses utilizing nonporous paper employ organic
solvent-borne inks which dry by solvent evaporation.  Sheet-fed presses
ulitize a non-solvent ink which dries'by air oxidation at room temperature
in racks.  Only web presses using solvent-borne inks are included in the
subject category.

Base Line Emissions
     The total national annual emissions of VOC web letterpress are
estimated to be 78,000 metric tons.

Control Technology
     A number of  incinerators have been installed to control print dryers*,
Test reports siiov; an average efficiency of 95 percent.  '   Allowing for a
                                    48

-------
slight loss of capture, overall  efficiency is 90 percent, comparable
to an.emission level of 0.036 kilograms per liter of ink used.
     Ultra-violet curing inks eliminate the use of volatile solvents.
The vehicle of the ink consists  entirely of monomers and prepolymers
which polymerize to a dry resin  film in a few seconds in an ultra-violet
light chamber.  Emissions are essentially zero.
     Heat reactive inks reduce the use of solvents.  The vehicle for these
inks consists mostly of monomers and prepolymers which polymerize under
the influence of heat and a catalyst.  Time and temperature requirements
are about the same as for drying conventional inks, hence conventional  dryers
can be used.  The inks contain only about 15 percent of the organic solvent
content of conventional inks.   Emission rates are about 0.054 kilograms  per
1i ter.
     Conventional heat-set inks averaging about 45 percent solvent can  be
controlled with carbon adsorption.  Overall recovery efficiency is about  90
percent.  Achievable emission level is about 0.036 kilograms per liter  of
ink used.
                                                                  /
     Water-borne inks are used in some letterpress applications and can
achieve an emission level of 0.06 kilograms of VOC per liter of ink (minus
water) representing a reduction of 80 percent over a typical heat-set ink.

Cost of Control
     The cost of incineration for letterpress operations are similiar to
those cited earlier for rotogravure printing.  Additional details are given
in Reference 4.
                                    49

-------
     In Reference 3, page 262,  it is  estimated that ultraviolet curing
inks cost 2 to 3 times as much  as conventional inks.   The cost of the
hardware to replace the existing oven would be considerable,  but no
specific figures are available.   However,  the cost of operating a UV
unit is less than the fuel cost of a  conventional  oven.
     The cost of heat-reactive  inks is reported to be 140 to  200 percent
of the cost of conventional  inks.   Since  conventional ovens  can be used,
there is no additional equipment cost for  a changeover.
     The hardware of a carbon adsorption system controlling a web-offset
                                                          3
printing plant is reported to cost 3.3 to  4.7 cents per Mm /s.   Presumably
                                               o
installed cost would be 6.6 to  9.4 cents per Mm /s.  In the desorption and
recovery process in this system, electric  heaters, vacuum pumps, and
refrigerated condensers are used.  The cost of conventional systems
using steam for desorption is given in Reference 4.
                                  V
References
     1.  Gadomski, R. R., "Evaluations of  Emissions and Control Technologies
in the Graphic Arts Industries, Phase II," Graphic Arts Technical Institute,
May 1973.
     2..  Gadomski, R. R., "Evaluations of  Emissions and Control Technologies
in the Graphic Arts Industries, Phase I,"  Graphic Arts Technical Institute,
August 1970.
     3.  "Environmental Aspects of Chemical Use in Printing Operations,"
EPA-560/1-75-005, Office of Toxic Substances, U. S. Environmental
Protection Agency, January 1976.
                                  50

-------
     4.  "Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary
Sources - Volume I:  Control Methods for Surface Coating Operations,"
EPA-450/2-76-028, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, November 1976.
     5.  Test Reports from the Los Angeles County Zone, South Coast Air
Quality Management District, El Monte, California.
                                   51

-------
                                GRAPHIC ARTS
                     FLEXOGRAPHIC  PRINTING OPERATIONS

 Process  Description
      In  flexographic printing,  like  letterpress,  the  image areas are
 raised above the nonimage surface.   The distinguishing  feature  is that
 the image carrier is made of rubber.  Flexographic  presses are  usually
 rotary web presses, i.e., roll-fed.   The major  categories of  the flexo-
 graphic  market are:  flexible packaging and  laminates,  multiwall bags,
 milk cartons, folding cartons,  corrugated paper,  paper  cups and plates,
 labels,  tags, tapes,, envelopes  and gift wrap.
      Flexography uses very fluid  inks, typically  about  60 percent organic
 solvent.  The inks dry by so.lvent evaporation,  usually  in high  velocity  air
dryers at temperatures generally below 121°C.
 Base Line Emissions
      It  is estimated that flexographic presses  emit 58,000 metric tons per
             2
 year of  VOC.
 Control  Technology
      A few flexographic presses are  controlled  by incineration. One  test
 report of a direct-flame incineration showed a  control  efficiency of  98
         3
 percent.   No test reports of catalytic  incinerators  have been  received,
 but the  technique appears to be applicable,  unless  fouling or poisoning
 substances are present.  No such  materials  are  evident  in flexography.
                                   52

-------
2.  Gadomski, R.R., et.al., ''Evaluations of Emissions and Control Tech-
    nologies in the Graphic Arts Industries, Phase  I.  Graphic Arts
    Technical Institute, August 1970.
3.  Test Reports from Los Angeles County Zone, South Coast Air Quality
    Management District.  El Monte, California.
4.  "Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources
    Volume I: Control Methods for Surface Coating Operations",
    EPA-450/2-76-028.  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, November 1976.
                                   54

-------
With a typical ink of 60 percent organic solvent, an incinerator system
with an overall efficiency of 85 percent would have an overall efficiency
of 85 percent and would have an achievable emission level of 0.07 kilogram
per liter of ink.
     Water-borne inks are used in several types of flexography applications,
A typical water-borne ink can achieve an organic emission level of 0.1
kilogram per liter of ink (minus water), representing a reduction of 80
percent over a typical solvent-borne ink.
     Ultraviolet curable and heat reactive inks have not been developed
with the low viscosity and other properties required for flexographic
inks, but there is a potential for their use.   Since most of the solvents
used in flexographic inks are water soluble, a carbon adsorption system
using conventional steam desorption would require a distillation system
to recover the solvents.  This wouTd be a deterrent but the method is
potentially viable.

Cost of Control
     The costs of incineration for flexographic presses would be similar
to those cited above for rotogravure printing.  Additional details are
given in Reference 4.
     The costs of water-borne inks are comparable to those of solvent-
borne inks.  Fuel cost for drying may be increased slightly.

References
1.   "Environmental Aspects of Chemical Use in Printing Operations",
     EPA/560/1-75-005.  Office of Toxic Substances, Environmental Protection
     Agency, January 1976.
                                   53

-------
                          RUBBER TIRE INDUSTRY
               Part 1 - CAMELBACK OR TREAD END MANUFACTURE

Process Description
     This operation involves the use of organic solvent-borne cement
to "tackify" the tire tread after extrusion but before it is used to
build tires.  The extruded tread-sidewall is assembled, cut to proper
length and the ends are coated with rubber cement.  The solvent, generally
naptha,  evaporates rapidly as the tread is conveyed through the building.

Base Line Emissions
     The emission factor for undertread cementing is estimated to be 28
grams per tire.   Since 250,000,000 tires are produced annually in this
country, these emissions amount to 7,000 metric tons per year.

Control Technology
     The control system consists of a collection system (to collect the
evaporated solvent from organic solvent-borne cement spray originating
from the spray operation and conveyors) and a control device (carbon
adsorber).  Collection efficiency is 90 percent and adsorption efficiency
is 95 percent for an overall control efficiency of 85 percent.  This
technology is not in widespread use in the industry but has been used at
several plants.

Cost of Control
     The costs of carbon adsorption for this source are presented in
Table 1.  When the recovered solvent is credited at its market value,
there is a net cost savings when a carbon adsorber is installed  in a plant.
                                   55

-------
                  Table 1.  CARBON ADSORPTION COSTS FOR A,TYPICAL
                           UNDERTREAD CEMENTING OPERATION3
                                                 Annualized      Control  cost,
                                                 operating        $/ton  of
                                    Capital         cost,          hydrocarbons
     Incineration device            cost,  $       $/year           removed

 Case with no credit for recovered  180,000         65,000          160
   solvent
 Case with recovered solvent        180,000         35,000           85
   credited at fuel value
 Case with solvent credited at      180,000        (10,000)b        (24)b
   market value
                         «
a Exhaust rate of 2.3'Nm  /s, temperature  of 21°C, operation at 25 percent LEL.
  Costs in parentheses indicate a net gain.
 References
 1.  "Identification and Control  of the Hydrocarbon Emissions from Rubber
     Processing Operations", EPA guideline document in preparation to be
     released in 1977.
 2.  "Assessment of Industrial Hazardous Waste Practices, Rubber and Plastics
     Industry", Chapter III, Rubber Products, Contract 68-02-3194,
     Foster D. Snell.
 3.  "Source Assessment Document" No. 24 Rubber Processing, EPA Source
     Assessment Document in preparation to be released in 1977.
                                      56

-------
                           RUBBER TIRE INDUSTRY
                Part 2 - FABRIC AND WIRE DIP AND CEMENT

Process Description
     Tire manufacturers dip textiles, cord,  and wire into rubber cement
or latex dip before calendering with rubber.  In this process,  sheets
of textiles, cord, and wire are fed under controlled tension to a cement
or latex dip tank.  After dipping, the material is fed past a series of
vacuum lines or rotating beater boxes to remove excess rubber or latex.
The coated material passes through a drying  oven to remove almost all
the solvent.  There is a trend to perform this operation at the textile
mills rather than the tire manufacturing plant.

Base Line Emissions
     The emission factor for textile, cord,  or stranded wire cementing
or latex dipping is 100 grams per tire.  Since 250,000,000 tires are
presently produced annually in this country, these emissions amount to
25,000 metric tons per year.  Fabric dipping or cementing is used on
other segments of the rubber industry such as the manufacturing of
braided hose, braided belts, and rubber footwear.  The emission factor
for cementing or dipping in these industries is 25 grams per kilogram
of product produced.

Control Technology
     Incineration and carbon adsorption can be.employed to control
volatile organic emissions from textile and stranded wire cementing
or dipping operations.  Thermal incineration can reduce the volatile
                                    57

-------
organic emissions by 95 percent.   Catalytic incinerators  can reduce
the volatile organic emissions by 90 percent.   Carbon adsorption can
reduce volatile organic emissions by 90 percent.   It has  not been feasible
to replace organic-borne with water-borne or high-solids  materials.
Space may be a problem since half of the tire manufacturing plants
are housed in older buildings with little available vertical  space
between floor and ceiling.
Cost of Control
     Cost calculations for incineration and carbon adsorption are shown
in Tables 1 and 2.

References
     1.  "Identification and Control  of Hydrocarbon Emissions from
Rubber Processing Operations." EPA guideline document in preparation
to be released in 1977.
     2.  "Assessment of Industrial Hazardous Waste Practices, Rubber
and Plastics Industry." Foster D.  Snell, Inc. Florham Park, New Jersey.
February 1976.
     3.  "Source Assessment Document - Rubber Processing." Monsanto
Research Corporation. Dayton, Ohio. August 1975.  (Draft Document).
                                   58

-------
                Table 1. :  INCINERAr'T'^J COSTS FOR A TYPICAL

                           FABRIC CCMENTTNG OPERATION1"*
Incineration device
Ho !>ent rocovory
Thermal
Catalytic
Primary heat recovery
Themal
Catalytic
Primary and secondary heat recovery
Thermal
Catalytic
Capital
cost, $

100,000
' 105,000

20,000
120,000

145,000
140,000
Annual ized
operating
cost ,
$/year

50,000
50,000

35,000
35, -000

28,000^
30,000
Control cost,
$/ton of
hydrocarbons
removed

90
90

63
63

$
aExhaust rate of 2.3 Nm /s, temperature of 160°C, operation at 25 percent
.of the LEL.
 Assumes that heat is recovered and used.


             Table 2.   CARBON ADSORPTION COSTS FOR A TYPICAL

                        FABRIC CEMENTING OPERATION0"

se with no credit for recovered
solvent
sc with recovered solvent
credited at fuel value
se with solvent credited at
market value
Capital
cost, $
180,000
180,000
180,000
Annual ized •
operating
cost ,
$/year
65,000
38,000
(9,COO)h.
Centre] • cost,
S/ton of
hydrocarbons
removed
160 .
90
(23)b
aExhaust rate of 2.3 Nm /s, temperature of 80°C, operation at 25 percent
.of the LEL.
 Costs in parentheses indicate a net gain.
                                     59

-------
                            RUBBER TIRE  INDUSTRY
                        Part 3 - GREEN TIRE SPRAYING

Process Description
     Before molding and curing, a "green" (nonvulcanized) tire is sprayed
both inside and out with organic solvent-borne release agents  (a material
that prevents sticking to the vulcanizing mold).  The solvent  evaporates
in the spray and vulcanizing areas.

Base Line Emissions
     Emissions due to green tire spraying are estimated at 140 grams  per
tire.  Since 250,000,000 tires are produced annually in this country,
these emissions amount to 35,000 metric tons of VOC each year.

Control Technology
     Emissions would be 90 percent reduced by the substitution of water-
borne for organic solvent-borne materials for both the inside and outside
spray for green tire application.  Water-borne materials have been used
by several plants but are not in widespread use.
     There are no technological impediments to the replacement of organic
solvent-borne release agents with water-borne materials.
     Adsorption is a feasible option but would likely be higher in cost
than use of water-borne materials.  Adsorption has not been used for this
process.

Cost of Control
     The switch from organic solvent-borne to water-borne material  will
not require significant capital investment.  Most of the same equipment
                                    60

-------
usually can be, employed.   Although the spray parameters are changed, the
cost of the water-borne material  is less.   There are no known factors
limiting control technology application.

References
1.  "Identification and Control of the Hydrocarbon Emissions from Rubber
    Processing Operations", EPA guideline document in preparation to be
    released in 1977.
2.  "Assessment of Industrial Hazardous Waste Practices, Rubber and
    Plastics Industry", Chapter III, Rubber Products, under EPA Contract
    68-02-3194, by Foster D. Snell.
3.  "Source Assessment Document -  Rubber".   EPA source assessment
    document in preparation to be released in 1977.
                                    61

-------
                               ADHESIVES



Process Description

     Adhesives are used for joining surfaces in assembly and construction

of a large variety of products.  Adhesives allow faster assembly speeds,

less labor input, and more ability to join dissimilar materials than

other fastening methods.  Adhesives may be water-borne, organic soWent-

borne, hot melt or high-solids.


Base Line Emissions

     Organic solvent usage for various adhesive applications are given
below:
                                                   Organic Solvent -,
                 Application                     (metric tons/year)

          Flooring, tile, wall covering               11,000
          Other construction                          14,000
          Aircraft assembly                              900
          Automobile assembly                         20,000
          Plywood and veneer                           2,000
          Particle Board                               1,300
          Furniture assembly                           7,300
          Other wood products                         11,800
          Textile products                             2,000
          Footwear                                     7,300
          Pressure sensitive tapes and labels        263,000
          Gummed tapes and labels             .         5^700
          Packaging laminates                          5,800
          Other paper products                        14,000
          Glass insulation                            13,000
          Abrasive products                            5,900
          Printing and publishing                      6,300
          Rubber Products                             21,500
          Tires                                        1,000
          Other                                       67,600
                                             Total496,800
                                    62

-------
     Essentially all of the organic solvent used in these adhesive
applications is emitted to the atmosphere when the adhesive dries.

Control Technology
     Organic solvent-borne adhesives can, in many instances, be replaced
with water-borne adhesives, hot melt adhesives, sol vent!ess two com-
ponent adhesives, or radiation cured adhesives.  Organic solvent
reduction of 80 to 99 percent per job can be achieved by such replacement.
     Water-borne natural adhesives (including animal glue, starches, dextrin
and proteins) already account for over 50 percent of the total  adhesive
      2
volume  and have been in use for a long time.  Synthetic water-borne
adhesives recently have been developed which have properties comparable
to organic solvent-borne adhesives.  These water-borne synthetic adhesives
can replace organic solvent-borne adhesives for many applications.

Cost of Control
     Low solvent adhesive may be lower or higher in cost,depending on the
product.  In any case, the adhesive is only a small part of the cost of
the manufactured product and does not substantially affect product cost.

References
1.  "Adhesives", Predicaste, Inc., 137, May 29, 1975.
2. "Synthetic Adhesives", Connolly, Eleanor, Stanford Research Institute,
    1967.
                                    63

-------
                            LARGE APPLIANCES

Process Description
     Large appliance parts typically are stamped from metal  sheets,
cleaned, and pretreated.  Exterior parts are coated with a prime
coating by flow or spray coating techniques.  Interior parts are
coated by flow or dip coating techniques.   (Sometimes the prime
and interior part coatings are the same.)   After curing, interior
parts are ready for assembly, and exterior parts are moved to the
topcoat application area.  The topcoat is  applied by automatic
electrostatic spraying and manual air spraying for touchup and
shading.  After curing, the parts are assembled.

Base Line Emissions
     Base line emissions for 1973 were about 32,300 metric tons per
year  uncontrolled.
Control Technology
     Table 1 shows the VOC reductions possible with applicable control
technology.  Powder and electrodeposition provide the greatest reduction
of organic emissions but may involve extensive equipment changes.
Although water-borne and high-solids coatings do not provide as great
a reduction in emissions (60 to 90 percent), they usually may be
applied using existing coating application equipment.  Add-on control
technology (incinerators and adsorbers) may be difficult to install  due
to the multi-level structure and limited floor space in some existing
plants.
                                   64

-------
Cost of Control :
     If new coating application equipment is necessary, capital  costs
for converting to low-solvent coatings may be appreciable.  However,
reduced solvent and energy and labor requirements may lower operating
costs.  Add-on control technology may be the most costly control method
                         p
($450-$650 per metric ton  of organics removed for incinerators for
                                               3
control of ovens and about $1100 per metric ton  of organics removed
for carbon adsorbers for control of application and flashoff areas).

Energy Requirements
      Incineration may require additional energy since ovens are often
located on the top level of the plant while the processes that can use
the recovered heat are often located at ground level.

References
     1.  "Sources and Consumption of Chemical Raw Materials in Paints
and Coatings - By Type and End Use," Stanford Research Institute,
October 197.4, page 210.
     2.  Combustion Engineering, Inc., Wellsville, New York, "Report on
Fuel Requirements, Capital Costs, and Operating Expense for Catalytic
and Thermal Afterburners," prepared for the U. S. Environmental  Protection
Agency under Contract No. 68-02-1473, Task 13, EPA-450/3-76-031,
September 1976.
      3.   "Control  of Volatile Organic Emissions  from Existing Stationary
 Sources  -  Volume  I:   Control  Methods  for Surface Coating Operations,"
 EPA-450/2-76-028,  November 1976 (OAQPS No.  1.2-067).
                                    65

-------
                                         Table 1
                      Control  Technology for Large Appliance Coating
VOC Emissions,



Application
Primer
Application:
Interior Part
Single Coat
Application:
Topcoat
Application:



Control
Technology
Water- Borne
Electrodeposition
Water- Borne
Electrodeposition
Powder
Water-Borne
"Higher" Solids
Powder

Has Been Used
In Large
Appliance Plant?
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
Major
Equipment
Change
Necessary?
no
yes
no
yes
yes
no
no
yes
kilograms per
liter of coat-
ing (minus
water)
0.29b
0.02
0.29b
0.02
0.02
0.29b
0.44C
0.02
Percent
Reductic
80b
99
80b
99
99
80b
57C
99
All Applications:

Coating Area
and Flashoff
Tunnel:

Oven:
Carbon
Adsorber
Incinerator
no
yes
no
no
                                                     0.29
                                         81
           a The base case assumed that the previous organic solvent-borne coatings
             contain 30 volume percent solids.

             The water-borne coating is assumed to contain 30 volume percent solids,
             14 volume percent organic solvent, and 56 volume percent water.  This
             is equivalent to the 80/20 Rule 66 definition of a water-borne coating.

           c This is equivalent to about 45-50  volume solids coating presently
             applied.  Research is currently being done to apply high-solids (70-80
             volume percent)coatings.  Such application techniques should be
             available in the near future.

             Although no change in coating equipment is necessary, perhaps other plant
             modifications will be necessary in large appliance plants to install
             such equipment.
                                             66

-------
                            MAGNET WIRE COATING

Process Description
     Wire coating is the process of insulating electrical  wire by applying
insulation varnish or enamel.  Coated wire is used in a variety of
electrical machinery such as motors and transformers.
     During coating, the wire is unwound from a spool and passed through
a bath of coating.  The wire is then drawn through an orifice or die which
scrapes off excess coating, leaving a layer of predetermined thickness.
The wire is conveyed through an oven (around 800°F) where the solvent is
driven off and the coating cured.

Base Line Emissions
     Annual solvent use for wire coating is 29,500 metric tons per year.
There is a high degree of control already in the industry, especially on
newer coating lines.  Estimates of current solvent emissions are 8,000
metric tons per year.

Control Technology
     Incineration, the only control technology commonly used, achieves
                                                        2 3
90 - 95 percent control and may be thermal or catalytic. *   M6st newer
wire coating ovens are built with an internal catalytic incinerator which
burns solvents inside the oven.  Control is common because recovered heat
can be .used, and because it eliminates malodors and avoids the buildup of
flammable resins in the stack.  Some newer types of coatings
                                    67

-------
will poison catalysts.  If coatings that poison catalysts are used,

thermal incinerators are required.

     Powder coatings and water-borne coatings have been developed for

only a small number of wire products to date.


Cost of Control
     A typical wire coating oven with an internal catalyst costs $100,000 to

$200,000.  The catalytic bed represents about $20,000 of the total.

     For internal incinerators, ten or more ovens are frequently vented
                                                                        4
to one incinerator.  Costs for such an incinerator are given in Table 1.
                  TABLE 1  INCINERATION COST FOR WIRE COATING
                            (7 NnT/s, 290°C, 15% of LEL)
Type of
Incineration
Installed
Cost$
Annuali zed
Operating
Cost, $/yr
Cost Effectiveness
$/metric ton
of Solvent Removed
Non Catalytic        183,000

  Primary and
  Secondary Heat
  Recovery
Catalytic            220,000
  Secondary Heat
  Recovery
34,800
39,690
48
55
                                    68

-------
References
1. "Sources and Consumption of Chemical  Raw Materials in Paints and
    Coatings - By Type and End Use", Stanford Research Institute,
    October 1974, page 210.
2.  Ruff, R.J., "Catalytic Combustion in Wire Enameling", Wire,
    October 1951, pages 936-940.
3.  KJoppenburg, W.B., DeBell and Richardson Trip Report No. 106,
    April 6, 1976.
4.  Combustion Engineering, Inc., Wellsville, N.Y.,"Report of Fuel
    Requirements, Capital Cost and Operating Expense for Catalytic and
    Thermal Afterburners". Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection
    Agency, Research Triangle Park, N.C. under Contract No. 68-02-1473,
    (Task No. 13), Publication No. 450/3076/031.
                                    69

-------
                            FLAT WOOD PRODUCTS

Process Description
     Flat wood products include plywood, particle board, hardboard, cedar
siding, and Softwood molding.  Not all  such products are factory coated.
When they are factory coated, VOC emissions occur from:  reverse-roll-
coating of filler; direct roll-coating of sealer; direct roll-coating of
topcoats; curtain coating; printing of wood-grain patterns and drying in
an infrared or steam-heated oven after one or more of the above coating
operations.

Base Line Emissions
     At present, approximately 54,000 metric tons of VOC are emitted
yearly by sources in this category.

Control Technology
     The control technology available for flat wood products includes
low-solvent ultraviolet (UV) curable coatings, water-borne coatings,
                 2
and incinerators.   UV curable coatings are sensitive to UV radiation,
under which rapid polymerization takes place to form the coating film.
UV fillers are frequently employed but only a few lines use UV cured
topcoats.  UV curable inks> from the paper coating industry would seem
to be applicable for grain printing as well.  Opaque base coats
curable with UV radiation are not now available though they are expected
to be available soon.  Where UV coatings are applicable, they produce
                                    70

-------
essentially zero VOC emissions.  Use of water-borne coatings usually
results in about an 80 percent VOC emission reduction.  Water-borne
coatings are available for filling and base coating but few water-
borne graining inks or topcoats are marketed.
     Afterburners can be used to control VOC emissions from baking ovens
                                                     2
with control efficiencies of greater than 90 percent.   Although no
flatboard coating facility is now known to use carbon adsorption as
an air pollution control device, it is technically feasible.
     Limitations to the use of UV coatings are lack of suitable opaque
basecoats and the difficulties associated with curing  irregular shapes.
Water-borne coatings have problems with "blocking" (i.e., the sticking
of the paper sheets used to separate boards), poor adhesion or staining.
Also, high gloss water-borne topcoats are not generally available at
present.

Cost of Control
     Accurate cost estimates are not yet available, but there probably
would be increased costs associated with water-borne coatings.  First,
the coatings themselves may cost more.  Also, there may be higher main-
tenance and utility costs with these coatings.  Utility costs for UV
curing are less than the costs for curing conventional coatings.

Environmental Considerations
     UV cure coatings do not have any adverse impact on the environment.
Water-borne coatings may result in slightly increased cost for water
pollution control since clean-up residue is sewered.
                                   71

-------
Energy Requirements
     Energy requirements for UV curing are less than for conventional
curing.  For water-borne coatings, energy requirements may be slightly
greater than for conventional  coatings though some plants are able to
operate at the same fuel usage.  At afterburner equipped plants, there
would seem to be ample opportunity to make use of recovered heat in
the baking oven.

References
     1.  "Sources and Consumption of Chemical Raw Materials in Paints
and Coatings - By Type and End Use," Stanford Research Institute,
October 1974, page 210.
     2.  Emission Test Reports from Metropolitan Office of Southern
California Air Pollution Control District, No. C-2133, C-2292.
                                   72

-------
                         INDUSTRIAL SURFACE COATING



Process Description

     There are many surface coating operations for which emission

limitations have not been recommended in specific EPA guidelines

(Control Technology Documents) or Standards Support and Environmental

Impact Statements.  While each product  has to meet usage and possibly

substrate specifications which may be unique, nevertheless, generali-

zations can be made as to the applicability of the low solvent coatings,

i.e. powder, water-borne and high solids coatings.  These coatings are

adaptable to many metal and plastic products.  Particularly where the

coating is hand sprayed or air dried, low solvent coating may represent

the most cost effective means of VOC control.


Base Line Emissions

     Base line emissions are shown below.

                                                       Solvents Used    -|
                  Industry                        (metric tons per year)


     Transportation equipment  (other                     15,400
        than auto and light trucks)
     Marine equipment                                     27,300
     Factory finished building products                    6,800
        (other than flat wood products)
     Exterior industrial maintenance                      68,600
     Interior industrial maintenance                      38,600
     Other products finishes                              84,100
     Thinners used                                       114,500

                                           Total         335,300


Control Technology

     Metal and plastic can be coated with enamels or other coatings con-

taining at least 33 percent feollds by volume.  With average percent solids
                                     73

-------
now around 20 percent, there will  be  about  a  50 percent  emission  reduction
achieved by going to the higher solids  coating.  Coating with  33  percent
solids have already been used in many products, so no new technology  should
be involved for most industries to use  this technology.   The coatings are
also applicable to wood products with opaque  coatings.
     The 33 percent solids coatings are not feasible for wood  furniture and
other wood products with clear coatings which show the wood grain.  Neither
do they apply to "trade sales", that  is shelf goods or stock type coatings
sold through retail or wholesale outlets to jobbers, dealers,  painters,
contractors, builders, automobile refinishers, or jobbers for  maintenance of
residences, institutions, and office  buildings.  These types of coatings
can't usually be employed in industrial maintenance finishes which are
specifically formulated for a particular performance requirement in the
industrial environment.
     There are many small metal products that are coated in only a few
colors.  Such products include lawn and garden machinery, light fixtures,
bicycles, tools, playground equipment,  small  parts, metal furniture,  and
innumerable other fabricated metal products.   These products usually can
be primed by electrodeposition (EDP)  and topcoated with  powder coatings,
resulting in significantly less volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions.
EDP and powder coatings have been used by numerous sources in  these
industries for both new and retrofit installations.  Organic solvent emissions
when using these coating technologies are almost zero, so efficiency of
control approaches 100 percent.  A realistic number limit is 0.04 kilogram
of VOC per liter of coating used.  Water-borne dip and spray and high-solids
                                     74

-------
coatings also are applicable to these sources but emission are greater,
about 0.37 kilograms per liter of coating used.  This is an 80-90
percent VOC reduction over typical organic solvent-borne coatings.   If
EDP or powder cannot be used, the latter should be evaluated.  The  key
factor governing applicability is whether the product meets normal  use
specifications when coated with powder or by EDP.  This is not usually
a problem since EDP and powder almost always give superior finish.   Many
colors, frequent color change, large size,or the presence of heat-
sensitive materials may affect the feasibility of these options.

Cost of Control
     The cost for metal coaters to switch to 33 percent solids enamels
usually is not great.  There should be no development costs since such
coatings are already marketed.  Conventional application techniques  and
equipment frequently can be used but some capital  investment may be  necessary.


References
1.  Stanford Research Institute, "Sources and Consumption of Chemical
    Raw Materials in Paints and Coatings - By Type and End Use",
    October 1974, page 210.
                                      75

-------