v>EPA
United Sttttt
Environmental Protection
Agency
Off in of
PwtteidM and Toxic SubcUnow
Washington DC 20460
December 1981
PacticidM
Bifenox
Methyl
5-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)
-2-n itro benzoate
Pesticide Registration
Standard
-------
BIFENOX
Pesticide Registration Standard
June, 1981
Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
-------
BIFENOX
PESTICIDE REGISTRATION STANDARD
Allie M. Little
Amy Ri spi n
Wi11i am Boodee
Michael Rexrode
Robert Lenahan
Patricia Ott
Rose Henderson
Delores Henderson
Bruce Sidwell
Chad Sandusky
Jacolyn Dzuiban
Project Manager (SPRD)
Science Policy Staff (HED)
Residue Chemi st (HED)
Wildlife Biologist (HED)
Economist (BFSD)
Environmental Chemist (HED)
Typist (SPRD)
Typist (SPRD)
Plant Scientist (BFSD)
Toxicologist (HED)
Product Manager (RD)
June 1981
Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter Page
I. How to Register Under a Registration Standard 1
II. Regulatory Position
A. Introduction 10
B. Description of Chemical 10
C. Regulatory Position 10
D. Regulatory Rationale 11
E. Criteria for Registration Under the Standard 12
1. Acceptable Ranges and Limits 13
a. Manufacturing-use Bifenox 13
Product Composition Standard
Acute Toxicity Limits
Use Patterns
b. End Use Bifenox - Wettable Powder 13
Emulsifiable Concentrate, Flowable
Product Composition Standard
Acute Toxicity Limits
Use Patterns and Application Methods
F. Required Labeling 14
6. Tolerance Reassessment 15
III. Data Requirements and Data Gaps
A. Manufacturing-use Bifenox 17
/ B. End Use Bifenox 18
C. Tables 1 Generic Data Requirements 19
., .. . ..2 Product-Specific Data Requirements 33
for Manufacturing-use Products
3 Product-Specific Data Requirements 36
for End Use Products
IV. Product Chemistry
A. Introduction 42
B. Manufacturing-Use Bifenox 42
C. Physical/Chemical Properties 44
D. Summary of Data Gaps 45
1. Technical Grade Bifenox 45
2. Manufacturing-Use Bifenox 46
3. End Use Bifenox 46
V. Envi ronmental Fate
A. Use Profile 47
B. Manufacturing-use Bifenox — — 48
C. Exposure Profile 51
D. Summary of Data Gaps —— 52
VI. Toxicology 53
-------
VII. Residue Chemistry
A. Introduction 54
B. Residue Chemistry Profile 55
C. Summary of Data Gaps 56
VIII. Ecological Effects
A. Ecological Effects Profile •— 57
1. Fish and Wildlife 57
2. Plants - 57
B. Hazard Assessment 58
1. Manufacturing-use Bifenox 58
2. End Use Products 58
3. Non-Target Plant 59
C. Summary of Data Gaps — 59
1. Manufacturing-use Bifenox 59
2. End Use Products 59
Case Bibliography
A. Guide to Use of the Bibliography
Section I
Section II
Section III
-------
Chapter 1
HOW TO REGISTER
UNDER A REGISTRATION STANDARD
Organization of the Standard
Purpose of the Standard
Requirement to Re-register Under the Standard
"Product Specific" Data and "Generic" Data
Data Compensation Requirements under FIFRA 3(c)(l)(D)
Obtaining Data to Fill "Data Gaps"; FIFRA 3(c)(2)(B)
Amendments to the Standard
Organization of the Standard
This first chapter explains the purpose of a Registration
Standard and summarizes the legal principles involved in
registering or re-registering under a Standard. The second
chapter sets forth the requirements that must be met to
obtain or retain registration for products covered by this
particular Registration Standard. In the remaining chapters,
the Agency reviews the available data by scientific discipline,
discusses the Agency's concerns with the identified potential
hazards, and logically develops the conditions and requirements
that would reduce those hazards to acceptable levels.
Purpose of the Standard
Section 3 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) provides that "no person in any
State may distribute, sell, offer for sale, hold for sale,
ship, deliver for shipment, or receive (and having so
received) deliver or offer to deliver, to any person any
pesticide which is .not registered with the Administrator [of
EPA]." To approve the registration of a pesticide, the
Administrator must find, pursuant to Section 3(c)(5) that:
"(A) its composition is such as to warrant the proposed
claims for it;
(B) its labeling and other material required to be
submitted comply with the requirements of this Act;
(C) it will perform its intended function without
unreasonable adverse effects on the environment;
and
(D) when used in accordance with widespread and
commonly recognized practice it will not generally
cause unreasonable adverse effects on the environment."
In making these findings, the Agency reviews a wide range of
data which registrants are required to submit, and assesses
the risks and benefits associated with the use of the
proposed pesticide. But the established approach to
making these findings has been found to be defective on two
counts:
-I-
-------
First, EPA and its predecessor agency, the United
States Department of Agriculture (USDA), routinely reviewed
registration applications on a 'product by product1 basis,
evaluating each product-specific application somewhat
independently. In the review of products containing similar
components, there was little opportunity for a retrospective
review of the full range of pertinent data available in
Agency files and in the public literature. Thus the 'product
by product1 approach was often inefficient and sometimes
resulted in inconsistent or incomplete regulatory judgments.
Second, over the years, as a result of inevitable and
continuing advances in scientific knowledge, methodology,
and policy, the data base for many pesticides came to be
considered inadequate by current scientific and regulatory
standards. Given the long history of pesticide regulation
in several agencies, it is even likely that materials may
have been lost from the data files. When EPA issued new
requirements for registration in 1975 (40 CFR 162) and
proposed new guidelines for hazard testing in 1978 (43 FR
29686, July 10, 1978 and 43 FR 37336, August 22, 1978), many
products that had already been registered for years were
being sold and used without the same assurances of human
and environmental safety as was being required for new
products. Because of this inconsistency, Congress directed
EPA to re-register all previously registered products, so as
to bring their registrations and their data bases into
compliance with current requirements [See FIFRA Section
3(9)]-
Facing the enormous job of re-reviewing and calling-in
new data for the approximately 35,000 current registrations,
and realizing the inefficiencies of the 'product by product1
approach, the Agency decided that a new, more effective
method of review was needed.
A new review procedure has been developed. Under it,
EPA publishes documents called Registration Standards, each
of which discusses a particular pesticide active ingredient.
Each Registration Standard summarizes all the data available
to the Agency on a particular active ingredient and its
current uses, and sets forth the Agency's comprehensive
position on the conditions and requirements for registration
of all existing and future products which contain that
active ingredient. These conditions and requirements, all
of which must be met to obtain or retain full registration
or re-registration under Section 3(c)(5) of FIFRA, include
the submission of needed scientific data which the Agency
does not now have, compliance with standards of toxicity,
composition, labeling, and packaging, and satisfaction of
the data compensation provisions of FIFRA Section 3(c)(l)(D).
-2-
-------
The Standard will also serve as a tool for product classi-
fication. As part of the registration of a pesticide
product, EPA may classify each product for "general use" or
"restricted use" [FIFRA Section 3(d)]. A pesticide is
classified for "restricted use" when some special regulatory
restriction is needed to ensure against unreasonable adverse
effects to man or the environment. Many such risks of
unreasonable adverse effects can be lessened if expressly
designed label precautions are strictly followed. Thus, the
special regulatory restriction for a "restricted use"
pesticide is usually a requirement that it be applied only
by, or under the supervision of, an applicator who has been
certified by the State or Federal government as being
competent to use pesticides safely, responsibly, and
in accordance with label directions. A restricted-use
pesticide can have other regulatory restrictions [40 CFR
162.11 (c)(5)] instead of, or in addition to, the certified
applicator requirement. These other regulatory restrictions
may include such actions as seasonal or regional limitations
on use, or a requirement for the monitoring of residue
levels after use. A pesticide classified for "general use,"
or not classified at all, is available for use by any
individual who is in compliance with State or local regu-
lations. The Registration Standard review compares infor-
mation about potential adverse effects of specific uses
of the pesticide with risk criteria listed in 40 CFR 162.11(c)
and thereby determines whether a product needs to be
classifed for "restricted use." If the Standard does
classify a pesticide for "restricted use," this determination
is stated in the second chapter.
R,equi rement t_p_ Re-regi ster Under, the Standard..
FIFRA Section 3(g), as amended in 1978, directs EPA to
re-register all currently registered products as expeditiously
as possible. Congress also agreed that re-registration
should be accomplished by the use of Registration Standards.
Each registrant of a currently registered product to
which this Standard applies, and who wishes to continue to
sell or distribute his product in commerce, must apply for
re-registration. His application must contain proposed
labeling that complies with this Standard.
EPA will issue a notice of intent to cancel the regist-
ration of any currently registered product to which this
Standard applies if the registrant fails to comply with the
procedures for re-registration set forth in the Guidance
Package which accompanies this Standard.
—3—
-------
"Product Specific" Data and "Generic" Data
In the course of developing this Standard, EPA has determined
the types of data needed for evaluation of the properties
and effects of products to which the Standard applies, in
the disciplinary areas of Product Chemistry, Environmental
Fate, Toxicology, Residue Chemistry, and Ecological Effects.
These determinations are based primarily on the data Guidelines
proposed in 1978 (43 FR 29686, July 10, 1978, and 43 FR
37336, August 2, 1978), as applied to the use patterns of
the products to which this Standard applies. Where it
appeared that data from a normally applicable Guidelines
requirement was actually unnecessary to evaluate these
products, the Standard indicates that the requirement has
been waived. On the other hand, in some cases studies not
required by the Guidelines may be needed because of the
particular composition or use pattern of products the
Standard covers; if so, the Standard explains the Agency's
reasoning. Data guidelines have not yet been proposed for
the Residue Chemistry discipline, but the requirements for
such data have been in effect for some time and are, the
Agency believes, relatively familiar to registrants.
Data which we have found are needed to evaluate the registra-
bility of some products covered by the Standard may not be
needed for the evaluation of other products, depending upon
the composition, formulation type, and intended uses of the
product in question. The Standard states which data require-
ments apply to which product categories. (See the second
chapter). The various kinds of data normally required
for registration of a pesticide product can be divided
into two basic groups:
(A) data that are "product specific," 'i.e:, data
that relates only to the properties or effects
of a product with a particular composition
(or a group of products with closely similar
compositi on); and
(B) "generic" data that pertain to the properties
or effects of a particular ingredient, and thus
is relevant to an evaluation of risks and
benefits of all products containing that
ingredient (or all such products having a
certain use pattern), regardless of any such
product's unique composition.
The Agency requires certain "product specific" data for each
product to characterize the product's particular composition
and physical/chemical properties (Product Chemistry), and to
characterize the product's acute toxicity (which is a function
of its total composition). The applicant for registration or
-4-
-------
re-registration of any product, whether it is a manufacturing-
use or end-use product, and without regard to its intended
use pattern, must submit or cite enough of this kind of data
to allow EPA to evaluate the product. For such purposes,
"product specific" data on any product other than the
applicant's is irrelevant, unless the other product is
closely similar in composition to the applicant's. (Where
it has been found practicable to group similar products for
purposes of evaluating, with a single set of tests, all
products in the group, the Standard so indicates). "Product
specific" data on the efficacy of particular end-use products
is also required where the exact formulation may affect
efficacy and where failure of efficacy could cause public:
health problems.
All other data needed to evaluate pesticide products
concerns the properties or effects of a particular ingredient
of products (normally a pesticidally active ingredient, but
in some cases a pesticidally inactive, "inert," ingredient).
Some data in this "generic" category are required to
evaluate the properties and effects of a 11 products
containing that ingredient [e.g., the acute LDrQ of the
active ingredient in its technical or purer graae; see
proposed 40 CFR 163.81-l(a), 43 FR 37355],
Other "generic" data are required to evaluate all products
which both contain a particular ingredient and are intended
for certain uses (see, e.g., proposed 40 CFR 163.82-1, 43 FR
37363, which requires subchronic oral testing of the active
ingredient with respect to certain use patterns only).
Where a particular data requirement is use-pattern dependent,
it will apply to each end-use product which is to be
labeled for that use pattern (except where-such- end-use
product is formulated from a registered manufacturing-use
product permitting such formulations) and to each manufac-
turing-use product with labeling that allows it to be used
to make end-use products with that use pattern. Thus, for
example, a subchronic oral dosing study is needed to evaluate
the safety of any manufacturing-use product that legally
could be used to make an end-use, food-crop pesticide. But
if an end-use product's label specified it was for use only
in ways that involved no food/feed exposure and no repeated
human exposure, the subchronic oral dosing study would not
be required to evaluate the product's safety; and
if a manufacturing-use product's label states that the
product is for use only in making end-use products not
involving food/feed use or repeated human exposure, the
subchronic oral study would not be relevant to the evalua-
tion of the manufacturing-use product either.
-5-
-------
If a registrant of a currently registered manufacturing-
use or end-use product wishes to avoid the costs of data
compensation [under FIFRA Section 3(c)(l)(D)] or data
generation [under Section 3(c)(2)(B)] for "generic" data
that is required only with respect to some use patterns, he
may elect to delete those use patterns from his labeling at
the time he re-registers his product. An applicant for
registration of a new product under this Standard may
similarly request approval of only certain use patterns.
IData Compensation Requirements under FIFRA 3(c) (1) (D)
Under FIFRA Section 3(c)(l)(D), an applicant for registration,
re-registration, or amended registration must offer to pay
compensation for certain existing data the Agency has used
in developing the Registration Standard. The data for which
compensation must be offered is all data which is described
by all the following criteria:
(1) The data were first submitted to EPA (or to its
predecessor agencies, USDA or FDA), on or after
January 1, 1970;
(2) The data were submitted to EPA (or USDA or FDA) by
some other applicant or registrant in support of
an application for an experimental use permit,
an amendment adding a new use to a registration,
or for re-registration, or to support or maintain
in effect an existing registration;
(3) They are the kind of data which are relevant to
the Agency's decision to register or re-register
the applicant's product under the Registration
Standard, taking into account the applicant's
product's composition and intended use pattern(s);
(4) The Agency has found the data to be valid and
usable in reaching regulatory conclusions; and
(5) They are not data for which the applicant has been
exempted by FIFRA Section 3(c)(2)(D) from the duty
to offer to pay compensation. (This exemption
applies to the "generic" data concerning the
safety of an active ingredient of the applicant's
product, not to "product specific" data. The
exemption is available only to applicants whose
product is labeled for end-uses for which the
active ingredient in question is present in the
applicant's product because of his use of another
registered product containing that active ingredient
which he purchases from another producer).
-6-
-------
An applicant for re-registration of an already registered
product under this Standard, or for registration of a new
product under this Standard, accordingly must determine
which of the data used by EPA in developing the Standard
must be the subject of an offer to pay compensation, and
must submit with his application the appropriate statements
evidencing his compliance with FIFRA Section 3(c)(l)(D).
An applicant would never be required to offer to pay
for "product specific" data submi tted by another firm. In
many, if not in most cases, data which are specific to
another firm's product will not suffice to allow EPA to
evaluate the applicant's product, that is, will not be
useful to the Agency in determining whether the applicant's
product is registrable. There may be cases, however, where
because of close similarities between the composition of two
or more products, another firm's data may suffice to allow
EPA to evaluate some or all of the "product specific"
aspects of the applicant's product. In such a case, the
applicant may choose to cite that data instead of submitting
data from tests on his own product, and if he chooses that
option, he would have to comply with the offer-to-pay
requirements of Section 3(C)(1)(D)for that data.
Each applicant for registration or re-registration of
a manufacturing-use product, and each applicant for registration
or re-registration of an end-use product, who is not exempted
by FIFRA Section 3(c)(2)(D), must comply with the Section
3(c)(l)(D) requirements with respect to each item of "generic"
data that relates to his product's intended uses.
A detailed description, of the. procedures an applicant
must follow in applying for re-registration (or new registra-
tion) under this Standard is found in the Guidance Package
for this Standard.
Obtaining Data t£ Fill "Data Gaps"; FIFRA 3(c)(2)(B)
Some of the kinds of data EPA needs for its evaluation
of the properties and effects of products to which this
Standard applies have never been submitted to the Agency
(or, if submitted, have been found to have deficiencies
rendering them inadequate for making registrability decisions)
and have not been located in the published literature
search that EPA conducted as part of preparing this Standard.
Such instances of missing but required data are referred to
in the Standard as "data gaps".
FIFRA Section 3(c)(2)(B), added to FIFRA by the Congress
in 1978, authorizes EPA to require registrants to whom a
data requirement applies to generate (or otherwise produce)
data to fill such "gaps" and submit those data to EPA. EPA
-7-
-------
must allow a reasonably sufficient period for this to be
accomplished. If a registrant fails to take appropriate
and timely steps to fill the data gaps identified by a
section 3(c)(2)(B) order, his product's registration may
be suspended until the data is submitted. A mechanism
is provided whereby two or more registrants may agree to
share in the costs of producing data for which they are
both responsible.
The Standard lists, in the third chapter, the "generic"
data gaps and notes the classes of products to which these
data gaps pertain. The Standard also points out that to be
registrable under the Standard, a product must be supported
by certain required "product specific" data. In some cases,
the Agency may possess sufficient "product specific" data on
one currently registered product, but may lack such data on
another. Only those Standards which apply to a very small
number of currently registered products will attempt to
state definitively the "product specific" data gaps on a
'product by product1 basis. (Although the Standard will in
some cases note which data that EPA does possess would
suffice to satisfy certain "product specific" data require-
ments for a category of products with closely similar
composition characteristics.)
As part of the process of re-registering currently registered
products, EPA will issue Section 3(c)(2)(B) directives
requiring the registrants to take appropriate steps to fill
all identified data gaps -- whether that data in question is
"product specific" or "generic" -- in accordance with a
schedule. ,
Persons who wish to obtain registrations for new products
under this Standard will be required to submit (or cite)
sufficient "product specific" data before their applications
are approved. Upon registration, they will be required
under Section 3(c)(2)(B) to take appropriate steps to submit
data needed to fill "generic" data gaps. (We expect they
will respond to this requirement by entering into cost-sharing
agreements with other registrants who previously have been
told they must furnish the data.) The Guidance Package for
this Standard details the steps that must be taken by
registrants to comply with Section 3(c)(2)(B).
-8-
-------
Amendment to the Standard
Applications for registration which propose uses or
formulations that are not presently covered by the Standard,
or which present product compositions, product chemistry
data, hazard data toxicity levels, or labeling that do not
meet the requirements of the Standard, will automatically
be considered by the Agency to be requests for amendments
to the Standard. In response to such applications, the
Agency may request additional data to support the proposed
amendment to the Standard, or may deny the application
for registration on the grounds that the proposed product
would cause unreasonable adverse effects to the environment.
In the former case, when additional data have been
satisfactorily supplied, and providing that the data do not
indicate the potential for unreasonable adverse effects, the
Agency will then amend the Standard to cover the new
registration.
Each Registration Standard is based upon all data
and information available to the Agency's reviewers on
a particular date prior to the publication date. This
"cut-off" date is stated at the beginning of the second
chapter. Any subsequent data submissions and any approved
amendments will be incorporated into the Registration
Standard by means of addenda, which are available for
inspection at EPA in Washington, D.C., or copies of which
may be requested from the Agency. When all the present
"data gaps" have been filled and the submitted data have
been reviewed, the Agency will revise the Registration
Standard. Thereafter, when the Agency determines that the
internally maintained addenda have significantly altered the
conditions for registration under the Standard, the document
will be updated and re-issued for publication.
While the Registration Standard discusses only the
uses and hazards of products containing the designated
active ingredient(s), the Agency is also concerned with
the potential hazards of some inert ingredients and impurities
Independent of the development of any one Standard, the
Agency has initiated the evaluation of some inert ingredients
of concern in a specific product to which the Standard
applies, these ingredients will be pointed out in the
Guidance Package. '
-9-
-------
II. REGULATORY POSITION
A. INTRODUCTION
This chapter presents the Agency's regulatory position
on products which contain bifenox as the sole active
ingredient and have the same use patterns as described
in this Standard. The regulatory position adopted by the
Agency incorporates a number of considerations. Foremost
among these considerations is an analysis of the regis-
trability of products containing bifenox based on the
risk criteria found in Section 162.11(a) of Title 40 of
the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations. The Agency's
determination is presented below, and the rationale for this
decision follows the position.
In addition to the basic regulatory decision and rationale,
this chapter includes the following: criteria for the
registration of bifenox products under the Standard;
acceptable ranges and limits for product composition, acute
toxicity, and use pattern/application method; required
labeling; and tolerance reassessment.
A summary of data requirements is contained in Chapter III,
Tables 1-3. Discussion of the data upon which this regulatory
position is based is presented in each of the disciplinary
chapters, (Chapters IV-VIII).
B. DESCRIPTION OF CHEMICAL
Bifenox is the common name for the herbicide methyl
5-(2 ,4-dichlorophenoxy)-2-nitrobenzoate. ' This herbicide is
used for preemergent weed control on soybeans, corn and
sorghum; pre- and postemergent use on rice, barley, wheat,
and oats, and postemergent use on forest tree nursery
seedbeds.
D
The trade name for this chemical is Modown . The Chemical
Abstracts Registry (CAS) number for bifenox is 42576-02-03.
This number was formerly 12680-11-4.
C. REGULATORY POSITION
The Agency has reviewed the data available to it on bifenox.
As will be indicated in the Topical Discussions which
follow, scientific data on bifenox products are limited.
While a complete data base is available on the residue
chemistry of bifenox, data on the physical/chemical properties,
ecological effects, and environmental fate are limited,
insufficient, or unavailable. Data needed to determine the
toxicity of bifenox to humans are absent because the studies
available to the Agency were conducted by Industrial Bio-Test
Laboratories (IBT), see Chapter VI. Thus, much of the data
needed to assess the hazard of bifenox to man and the
environment do not now exist.
-10-
-------
Based on review of the available scientific data obtained
from the open literature as of May, 1981, and the data
submitted by the registrant up through publication of
this Standard,the Agency believes that none of the risk
criteria found in Section 162.11(a) of Title 40 of the U.S.
Code of Federal Regulations would be met or exceeded and
that bifenox does not appear to cause unreasonable adverse
effects with proper label directions and precautions.
In accordance with FIFRA, the Agency's policy is not to
cancel routinely the registration of products merely because
it lacks data, or to withhold registration merely for the
lack of data [See Section 3(C)(2)(B) and Section (3)(c)(7)
of FIFRA]. Bifenox products as described in this Standard,
therefore, may be registered for sale, distribution,
reformulation and use in the United States subject to the
the conditions imposed for data requirements. New products
may be registered under this Standard and are subject to
the same requirements. When the data gaps identified in
this Standard are filled, the Agency will reassess the
registration status of bifenox.
D. REGULATORY RATIONALE
Bifenox is a pre-emergent herbicide used to control a variety
of weeds. The chemical is used also as a postemergent
treatment on some agricultural sites. Bifenox was developed
during the early 1970's by the Phosphorous Division of Mobil
Chemical Company. This chemical has had appreciable use
since then, with an annual estimated production of 2-3
mi 11 i"on pounds.
Numerous, gaps in the data base preclude completion of an
assessment of the hazards and potential risks to humans and
the environment as a result of exposure to Bifenox products.
Other than the data generated by IBT, toxicity data are not
available on any bifenox products. Some data are available
on the physical/chemical properties of bifenox, but several
gaps exist in the product chemistry data base. There are
limited data on the environmental fate and ecological
effects of bifenox. Several of the submitted studies on
ecological effects either did not meet Agency's guideline
requirements due to deviations from acceptable protocols, or
were IBT data which could not be included in the Standard
(see Chapters III, VI and VIII). ^
A review of the studies sufficient to meet data requirements
and those which failed to meet data requirements but which
provided some level of qualitative information revealed no
adverse effects of regulatory concern. Thus, the Agency
does not have reason to believe that the use of bifenox will
cause unreasonable adverse effects when used in compliance
with proper label directions and precautions.
-11-
-------
As noted in Chapter V on the fate of bifenox in the environ-
ment, some exposure can be expected from use of this pesticide,
with the greatest potential occurring during mixing, loading,
and spraying operations. However, data are not available to
estimate the degree of such exposure. Exposure can be
minimized by the use of gloves and protective clothing
during mixing and loading and by following use and disposal
directions currently found on the labels.
E. CRITERIA FOR REGISTRATION UNDER THE STANDARD
To be subject to this Standard, bifenox products must
meet the following conditions:
(a) contain bifenox as the sole active ingredient or
contain bifenox in a mixture which has the same
use patterns described in this Standard;
(b) be within acceptable standards of product
com positi on;
(c) be within acceptable acute toxicity limits;
(d) be labeled for acceptable end-uses; and
(e) bear required labeling.
Manufacturing-use bifenox products must bear label directions
for formulation into acceptable end-uses.
Applicants for registration or reregistration of bifenox
products subject to this Standard must comply with all terms
and conditions described in this Standard, including commitment
to fill data gaps on a time schedule specified by the Agency
and, when applicable, offer to pay compensation to the
extent required by 3(c)(l)(D) and 3(c)(2)(D) of the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), as
amended, 7 U.S.C. 136(c)(l)(D) and 136(c)(2)(D). As discussed
in Chapter I, applicants for registration under this Standard must
contact the Agency for specific instructions, including
updated information on data requirements and companies whose
data must be cited and to whom compensation must be offered.
The only registrant that has submitted data in support
of bifenox registrations, and has not waived rights to
compensation for data, is Mobil Chemical Company.
-12-
-------
Acceptable Ranges and Limits
a. Manufacturing-use Bifenox
1. Product Composition Standard
To be covered under this Standard, manufacturing-use
bifenox products must contain bifenox as the sole active
ingredient. Manufacturing-use bifenox products with any
percentage of active ingredient with appropriate
certification of limits are acceptable under this
Standard.
2. Acute Toxicity Limits
The Agency will consider registration of manufacturing-
use bifenox products in the following toxicity categories
I II III IV
Acute oral toxicity yes yes yes yes
Acute dermal toxicity yes yes yes yes
Acute inhalation toxicity yes yes yes yes
Primary eye irritation yes yes yes yes
Primary dermal irritation yes yes yes yes
3. Use Patterns
To be covered under this Standard, manufacturing-use
bifenox products must be labeled for formulation into
end-use pesticides which are intended for terrestrial
and aquatic appl icati ons.
b. End Use Bifenox - Wettable Powder. Emulsifiable
Concentrate, Flowable
1. Product Composition Standard
End use bifenox products with any percentage of active
ingredient are acceptable under this Standard with
appropriate certification of limits.
Inert ingredients in food-use formulations must be
cleared for such use under 40 CFR 180-1001. The inert
ingredients in the end use bifenox products are exempt
according to 40 CFR 180.1001(c) and (d).
-13-
-------
2. Acute Toxicity Limits
The Agency will consider registration of any end use
bifenox product for nondomestic use in the following
categori es:
I II III IV
Acute oral toxicity yes yes yes yes
Acute dermal toxicity yes yes yes yes
Acute inhalation toxicity yes yes yes yes
Primary eye irritation yes yes yes yes
Primary dermal irritation yes yes yes yes
3. Use Patterns and Applications Methods
To be registered under this Standard, end use products
of bifenox must be labeled as herbicides for the
foilowi ng uses :
food uses non-food uses
corn forest nursery seedbeds
rice
sorghum
soybeans
small grains
(oats, barley, wheat)
The Agency finds that it must limit application rates
not to exceed current levels because of a lack of adequate
data needed to complete a hazard assessment. This is an
interim measure which may need to be reassessed following
the receipt of required data.
F. REQUIRED LABELING
All manufacturing-use and end-use bifenox products must
bear appropriate labeling as specified in 40 CFR 162.10.
The guidance package for this Standard contains specific
information"regarding label requirements.
1. Manufacturing-Use Products
a. Use Pattern Statements
All manufacturing-use bifenox products must list on
the label the intended end-uses of formulated products
-14-
-------
produced from the manufacturing-use product. In accordance
with data to be submitted or cited, all manufacturing-use
bifenox labels must bear the following statement:
"For Formulation into End-Use Herbicide Products
Intended Only for Terrestrial and Aquatic Use"
b. Precautionary Statements
There are no unique precautionary statements which
must appear on the bifenox label. The guidance package
provides an updated list of all standard precautionary
statements which must appear for this type of product.
The Agency may, after review of data to be submitted
under this Standard, impose additional label
requi rements.
2. End Use Bifenox Products
There are no unique precautionary statements which must
appear on the bifenox label. The guidance package provides
an updated list of all standard precautionary statements
which must appear for this type of product.
The Agency may, after review of data to be submitted
under this Standard, impose additional label requirements.
G. TOLERANCE REASSESSMENT
A tolerance of 0.05 ppm has been established in the United
States for residues of bifenox (40 CFR 180.351) in or
on the following raw .agricul tural commodities:.
Barley (grain, straw)
Corn (field, fodder, forage)
Oats (grain, straw)
Rice (grain,straw)
Sorghum (forage, grain)
Soybeans (forage, hay)
Wheat (grain, straw)
Residue studies conducted on the above commodities show
that bifenox residues do not exceed the established
pesticide tolerance of 0.05 ppm. No evidence of bifenox
residues were found in animal feed items at the practical
sensitivity (0.05ppm) of the method. Thus, there is no
reasonable expectation of residues in meat, milk, or
poultry and eggs.
-15-
-------
Based on the established tolerances, the theoretical maximum
residue concentration in the diet of bifenox is calculated
to be 0.0099 mg/day. In the absence of a toxicology data
base, the Agency is unable to set a No Observable Effect
Level (NOEL) for bifenox.
No recommendation for maximum residue limits has been
made for this chemical by the Codex Alimentarius Commission.
Tolerances have not been established in Mexico for residues
of bifenox. Negligible tolerances have been established in
Canada at 0.1 ppm in barley, oats and wheat for residues of
bi fenox.
The U.S. tolerance is a negligible tolerance and could be
made consistent with the Canadian tolerance; i.e. 0.1 ppm
for the grain crop grouping as defined under Title 40,
section 180.34(F), which states in part:
"It may be possible to make a reliable estimate
of negligible residues of pesticide chemicals
to be expected on each commodity in a designated
grouping on the basis of data on a representative
number of commodities listed in the following
desi gnated groups."
The commodities listed for grain crops include any crop
belonging to the family Graminae that produces mature seeds
that are used for food or feed, barley, buckwheat, corn
(field corn, sweet corn, and popcorn), millet, milo, oats,
rice, rye, sorghums (grain), and wheat.
When the Agency establishes "crop group" tolerances, bifenox
would appear to be an ideal candidate for a grain crop
tolerance.
Upon receipt of the required toxicology data, tolerances may
be reassessed.
-16-
-------
III. DATA REQUIREMENTS AND DATA GAPS
A. MANUFACTURING-USE BIFENQX
The toxicology data available to the Agency on bifenox
were generated by Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories (IBT).
These studies currently are being reviewed by the Canadian
government under the EPA Laboratory Audit Program. Under
the Registration Standard Program, Agency's policy provides
that IBT studies which have not yet been reviewed are
considered administratively invalid and will not be included
in the Registration Standard. Thus, data requirements
identified in the Tables which follow do not reflect company
submitted studies which were conducted by IBT. In addition,
science chapters do not reflect information contained in IBT
studies that have not yet been validated.
Table 1, entitled Bifenox Generic Data Requirements,
includes those data that pertain to the properties or
effects of bifenox as an active ingredient. Thus, these
data are relevant to an evaluation of the risks and benefits
of all products containing bifenox. Providing data to
fulfill indicated gaps is the primary responsibility of the
manufacturing-use product registrant(s). Registrants
of end-use products which are not exempted by FIFRA Section
3(c)(2)(.D) are also responsible for the submission of
these data. Applicants for the registration or reregistrati on
of manufacturing-use bifenox products must acknowledge
reliance on existing data which fulfill indicated'data
requirements under FIFRA 3(c)(l)(D). These data are listed
under the column entitled Bibliographic Citation in this
table.
Table 2, entitled Bifenox Product-Specific Data Requirements
for Manufacturing-Use Products,includes those data that
relate only to the properties or effects of a product with a
specific composition. Thus, these data are required of each
product to characterize the product's particular composition
and physical/chemical properties, and acute toxicity.
Providing data to fulfill these data requirements for a
particular product is the responsibility of each applicant
for the registration or reregistration of a manufacturing-use
bifenox product. If the Agency has in its possession
product-specific data which fulfill a data requirement for a
particular product, this is indicated in the guidance
package accompanying this Standard.
Applicants for the registration of new manufacturing-use
bifenox products must submit all required product specific
data or establish that the proposed product is substantially
similar to another product for which the Agency has received
acceptable product specific data.
-17-
-------
If the Agency has determined that one or more existing
manufacturing-use bifenox products are substantially similar,
then this, too, is indicated. Product specific data need
not be acknowledged under FIFRA 3(c)(l)(D) unless the
Agency or registrant has established that a product is
substantially similar to another product for which the
Agency has received acceptable product specific data. If
this should occur, the registrant(s) of the former product(s)
is required to acknowledge reliance on these data.
B. END USE PRODUCTS OF BIFENOX
•Registrants of end-use bifenox products not exempted by
FIFRA Section 3(c)(2)(D) are responsible for the submission
of "generic" data described in Tables 1 and 2 of this
Chapter, in addition to the product specific data listed in
Table 3.
Registrants of all end-use bifenox products are advised
that if data are not generated to fulfill generic data
requirements for the manufacturing-use product(s), these
registrations will be suspended. If continued availability
of the manufacturing-use product is desired, this data must
be supplied.
Table 3, entitled Bifenox Product-Specific Data Requi rements
for End-Use Products, includes those data that relate only
to the properties or effects of an end-use product with a
specific composition.
-18-
-------
Table 1
Bifenox product-Chemistry (See Chapter IV)
Generic Data Requirements
Guidelines
Citation
163.61-8(1)
163.61-8(2)
163.61-8(3)
163.61-8(4)
163.61-8(5)
1
163.61-8(6)
163.61-8(7)
Does EPA Have
Data to Partially
Name of Are Data - or totally Satisfy
Test . Required Composition this Requirement
Color Yes Technical Grade All
-
Odor Yes Technical Grade All
Melting Point Yes Technical Grade All
Solubility Yes Technical Grade Partial—'
Stability Yes Technical Grade All
Octanol/water Yes Technical Grade No
Partition coefficent
Physical State Yes Technical Grade All
Must Additional Data be
Submitted under FIFRA
3(c)(2)(B)? If so, months
allowed for submission
Bibliographic from published date of
Citation standard
Mobil No
MRID 800003518
Mobil NO
MRID 800003518
Mobil No
MRID 800003518
Mobil Yes/8 mos.
MRID 800003518
Mobil NO
MRID 80003518
yes/8 mos.
Mobil NO
MRID 80003518
V The Proposed guidelines require that the solubility be reported preferably in g/100 mi of
_ solvent at 20 C or in other terms as ppm. The solubility was reported in percentages
"without giving the basis on which these percentages were calculated. Therefore, additional
data are required.
These data requirements are current as of June, 1981. Refer to guidance
package for updated requirements.
-------
Table 1 (oont.)
Bifenox Product-Chemistry (See Chapter IV)
Generic Data Requirements
Must Additional Data be
Submitted under FIFRA
Guidelines
Citation
163.61-8(8)
163.61-8(9)
163.61-8(10)
163.61-8(11)
Name of
Test
Density or
Specific Gravity
Boiling Point
Vapor Pressure
PH
Are Data
Required
Yes
No*/
Yes
Yes
Does EPA Have
Data to Partially
or totally Satisfy
Composition this Requirement
Technical Grade No
Technical Grade All
Technical Grade No
3(c)(2)(B)? If so, months
allowed for submission
Bibliographic from published date of
Citation standard
yes/8 mos.
Mobil No
MRID #00003518
yes/8 mos.
I/ Not applicable to a solid.
These data requirements are current as of June, 1981. Refer to guidance
package for updated requirements.
-------
i
ru
V 163.62-8(c)
163.62-8(d)
163.62-8(e)
Table 1 (Cont'd)
Bifenox Environmental Fate (See Chapter V)
Generic Data Requirements—'
Guidelines
Citation
163.62-7{b)
163.62-7(c)
163.62-8(b)
Name of Are Data
Test Required
Hydrolysis yes
Photodegradation Yes
Aerobic soil Yes
metabolism
; ' Does EPA Have
Data to Partially
or totally Satisfy
Composition this Requirement
See Footnote 2 Partial—'
See Footnote 2 No
See Footnote 2 Partial-/
Must Additional Data be
Submitted under FIFRA
3(c)(2)(B)? If so, months
allowed for submission
Bibliographic from published date of
Citation standard
Lee, Metcalf, Yes/24 mos.
Hsu 1976
MRID #05002741
Yes/24 mos.
Ohyama, Yes/24 mos.
Kuwatsuka, 1975
MRID #05005107
Mobil
MRID #00003427
Mobil, 1972
800003428
Mobil, 1976
#00003358
Anaerobic soil No
metabolism
Anaerobic aquatic Yes
metabolism
Aerobic Yes
aquatic
metabolism
See Footnote 2
See footnote 2
No
No
Yes/24 mos.
Yes/24 mos.
I/
I/
I/
4/
Data requirements apply to manufacturing-use and end-use products.
.Radio-labelled analytical grade or non-radio-labelled technical.
The formation of transformation products by hydrolysis could not be distinguished from other chemical
or biological means because the study was not conducted under controlled laboratory conditions
in the dark.
All data specified in section 163.62-8(b) of the Guidelines for aerobic soil metabolism are needed
to assess the metabolism of bifenox in soil.
These data requirements are current as of June, 1981.
package for updated requirements.
Refer to guidance
-------
tu
Table 1 (Cont'd)
Bifenox Environmental Fate (See Chapter V)
Generic Data Requirements
Must Additional Data be
Submitted under FIFRA
Guidelines
Citation
163.62-8(f)
Name of
Test
Microbial
metabolism
(2) effects of _
microbes on
pesticides
(3) effects of _
pesticides on
microbes
Are Data
Required Composition
Yes*/
i /
Yesi'
Does EPA Have
Data to Partially
or totally Satisfy
this Requirement
No
No
3(c)(2)(B)? If so.
months
allowed for submission
Bibliographic from published date
Citation standard
Reserved
Reserved
of
I/ The requirement for the submission of these data is currently being reserved pending
the review and modification of the testing protocols.
These data requirements are current as of June, 1981. Refer to guidance
package for updated requirements.
-------
Table 1 (Cont'd)
Bifenox Environmental Fate (See Chapter V)
Generic Data Requirements
Guidelines
Citation
163.62-8(g)
163.62-9(b)
163.62-9(c)
163.62-9(d)
163.62-9(e)
163.62-10(b)
i
Name of
Test
Activated sludge
metabolism
Leaching
Malatility
Adsorption/
desorption
Water dispersal
Terrestrial field
dissipation
(1) Field &
vegetable crop
(2) Tree Fruit
& nut crop uses
(3) Pasture land
uses
Are Data
Required
Yes!/
Yes!/
No
Yes<>/
Yes
A /
Yes!/
NO
No
Must Additional Data be
Submitted under FIFRA
Does EPA Have 3(c)(2)(B)? If so, months
Data to Partially allowed for submission
or totally Satisfy Bibliographic from published date of
Composition this Requirement Citation standard
No . Reserved
See Footnote 1 Partial—/ Leather, Foy Yes/24 mos.
MRID #05002738
See Footnote 1 No Yes/24 mos.
-
See Footnote 2 No Yes/24 mos.
See Footnote 2 No Yes/24 mos.
No
-
No
(4) Domestic outdoor
parks, ornamentals
and turf uses
No
•
I/ Radio-labelled analytical grade or non-radio-labelled technical.
_2/ A representative formulated product.
3/ ,The requirement for the submission of these data is currently being reserved pending the review and modification of the testing protocols.
_4/ For terrestrial noncrop uses, orchard crop uses, field-vegetable crop uses, and forestry uses, the mobility of the test substance and
its degradatc-s in soil shall be assessed either by soil thin layer caronatography, soil columns, or batca equilibrium (adsorption/
disorption) procedures.
j>/ Only one stu'iy was used to test pesticide leaching. A minimum of four studies is required according to 163.62-9 of the guidelines.
All specific.! data in 163.62-9(b) are needed to determine the susceptability of bifenox to leaching.
6/ For domestic outdoor uses, greenhouse uses, aquatic uses, and aquatic impact uses, the mobility of the test substance and its
degradates in soil shall be assessed only by the batch equilibrium (adsorption/desorption) procedure.
-------
•Bible i (Cont'd)
Bifenox Environmental Fate (See Chapter V)
Generic Data Requirements
Guidelines
Citation
ro
f
Name of
ttest
Are Data
Required
Composition
Does EPA Have
Data to Partially
or totally Satisfy
this Requirement
Bibliographic
Citation
Must Additional Databe
Submitted under FIFRA
3(c)(2)(B)? If so, months
allowed for submission
from published date of
standard
See Footnote 1
Partial-/
Mobil, 1973
MRID *00003461
Yes/24 mos.
(5) Rights of No
way, shelterbelts
and related uses
163.62-10(0 Aquatic field
dissipation
(1) Aquatic food
crop uses Yes
(2) Aquatic noncrop
uses No
(3) Specialized
aquatic uses No
163.62-10(d) • -terrestrial/
aquatic (forest)
field dissipation No
163.62-10(6) Aquatic impact
uses
(1) Direct discharge No
(2) Indirect
discharge No
(3) Wastewater
. treatment No
I/ Each formulated end-use product.:
y All data specified in Section 163.62-10(c) of the Guidelines are needed to determine the dissipation rate of bifenox of each formulated
end-use product in the aquatic environment.
These data requirements are current as of June, 1981. Refer to guidance
package for updated requirements.
-------
t
I\J
163.62-ll(e)
163.62-13
Table 1 (Cont'd)
Bifenox Bwironmental Fate (See Chapter V)
Generic Data Requirements
Guidelines
Citation
163.62-10(f)
163.62-10(9)
163.62-ll(b)
163.62-ll(c)
163.62-ll(d)
Must Additional Data be
, Submitted under FIFRA
Does EPA Have 3(c)(2)(B)? If so, nonths
Data to Partially allowed for submission
Name of Are Data • or totally Satisfy Bibliographic from published date of
Test Required Composition this Requirement Citation standard
Combination and tank No -
mix field dissipation
8/
Long term field Yes5-' See Footnote 3 No Reserved
dissipation study
Accumulation in Yes See Footnote 2 Partial— Leather/Foy, 1977 Yes/ S^mos.
rotational crops MRID *05002738
Accumulation in Yes See Footnote 3 No Yes/24 mos.
irrigated crops
Fish accumulation Yes See Footnote 4 Partial— Lee, Metacalf Yes/24 mos.
Hsu, 1975
MRID 005002741
Special studies
accumulation in
aquatic, noncrop
uses
Disposal and
storage
No
Yes!/
No
Reserved
I/ Not applicable to single active ingredient standard.
2/ Radio-labelled analytical grade (if residues are found, then a field test using a representative formulation).
_3/ A representative formulated product.
4_/ fciclio-labelled analytical grade or non-radio-labelled technical.
J>/ Tne requirement for the submission of these data is currently being reserved pending the review and modification
of the testirvj protocols.
6/ Additional data are needed in greenhouse studies using crops other than oats to determine if bifenox residues will
accuraiulate in rotational crops and additional field data are needed on the accumulation of bifenox in oats.
T/ Additional .-undies using other recannended species of fish, a flow-through exposure system, more extensive
sampling, a:; i a depuration period are needed to properly evaluate the environmental effect of bifenox on fish.
S/ The requireir.-..-nt for submission of these data is reserved pending evaluation of terrestrial and aquatic
field data.
-------
Table 1 (Conf d)
Bifenox Toxicology (See Chapter VI)
Generic Data Requirements
Must Additional Data be
Submitted under FIFRA
Does EPA Have 3(c)(2)(B)? If so, months
Data to Partially allowed for submission
Guidelines Name of Are Data or totally Satisfy Bibliographic from published date of
Citation Test Required Composition this Requirement Citation standard
163.81-1 Acute Oral Yes Technical Grade No
Toxicity
163.81-2 Acute Dermal Yes Technical Grade No
Toxicity
163.81-3 Acute Inhalation Yes Technical Grade No
b 163.81-4 Primary Eye Yes Technical Grade No
T Irritation
163.81-5 , Primary Dermal Yes Technical Grade No
Irritation
163.81-6 Dermal Sensitization Yes Technical Grade No
163.81-7 Acute Noi/ Technical Grade No
Neurotoxicity
Yes/8 Mos.
Yes/8 Mos.
Yea/8 Mos.
Yes/8 Mos.
Yes/8 Mos.
Yes/8 Mos.
No
I/ Acute delayed neurotoxicity data are not required because bifenox is not expected to cause
'esterase depression nor is it structurally related to a compound that induces neutopathy
or delayed neurotoxicity.
These data requirements are current as of June, 1981. Refer to guidance
package for updated requirements.
-------
Table 1 (Cont'd)
Bifenox Toxicology (See Chapter VI)
Generic Data Requirements
Guidelines
Citation
163.82-1
163.82-2
163.82-3
163.82-4
Name of
Test
Subchronic
Oral Toxicity
Subchronic
21-day Dermal
Toxicity
Subchronic
90-day Dermal
Toxicity
Subchronic
Inhalation
Toxicity
Must Additional Data be
Submitted under FIFRA
Does EPA Have 3(c)(2)(B)? If so, months
Data to Partially allowed for submission
Are Data or totally Satisfy Bibliographic from published date of
Required Composition this Requirement Citation standard
Yes-' Technical Grade Yes/24 mons.
2/
Yes-7 Technical Grade Yes/24 mos.
No Technical Grade No
No=- Technical Grade No
163.82-5
Sity
Technical Grade
No
I/ This test is required for bifenox because its use requires a tolerance.
2/ This test is required for bifenox because its use may result in repeated skin contact.
3/ Acute inhalation data were not available. A Subchronic test may be required pending results of an acute inhalation test.
_£/ Acute delayed neurotoxicity data are not required because bifenox is not expected to cause esterase depression, nor is it
•structurally related to a compound that induces neuropathy or delayed neurotoxicity.
• These data requirements are current as of June, 1981.
package for updated requirements.
Refer to guidance
-------
Table 1 (Cont'd)
•
Bifenox Toxicology (See Chapter VI)
Generic Data Requirements
Guidelines
Citation
163.83-1
163.83-2
163.83-3
, 163.83-4
?° 163.84-2
through 4
163.85-1
Name of Are Data
Test Required
Chronic Feeding Yes
Cncogenicity Yes
Tteratogenicity Yes
Reproduction Yes
Mutagenicity Yes
Metabolism Yes
Must Additional Data be
Submitted under FIFRA
Does EPA Have 3(c)(2)(B)? If so, months
Data to Partially allowed for submission
or totally Satisfy Bibliographic from published date of
Composition this Requirement Citation standard
Technical Grade No— Yes
Technical Grade No-* Yes
Technical Grade No^ Yes
Technical Grade No-' Yes
Technical Grade No— Yes
Technical Grade No Yes 2*) mos.
I/ The submitted data are IBT data that are considered invalid for purposes of this standard.
IBT data for EPA. Consult with EPA Laboratory Audit Program prior to initiating studies.
The Canadian government is validating
These data requirements are current as of June, 1981. Refer to guidance
package for updated requirements.
-------
\0
Table 1 (Cont'd)
Bifenox Residue Chemistry (See Chapter VII)
Generic Data Requirements
Guidelines Name of
Citation Test
—
—
—
—
—
—
— —
V This
2/ This
3/ This
Metabolism in
in Plants
Metabolism in
Animals
Analytical Methods
Residue Data:
Field Com
Residue Data:
Rice
Residue Data:
Sorghum, Grain
and Fodder
Residue Data:
Barley, Oats,
and Wheat
Residue Data?
Milk, Meat, and Eggs
Storage Stability
requirement is satisfied by
requirement is satisfied by
requirement is satisfied by
Are Data
Required Composition
Yes Technical Grade
Yes Technical Grade
Yes Technical Grade
Yes Technical Grade
Yes Technical Grade
Yes Technical Grade
Yes Technical Grade
Yes Technical Grade
Yes Technical Grade
the following studies: MRID
the following studies: MRID
the following studies': MRID
Does EPA Have
Data to Partially
or totally Satisfy
this Requirement
All
All
All
All
All
All
All
All
All
05005107, 05002738, 05002879
00003522, 05005105, 00003413
00003432, 00003478, 00003521
Bibliographic
Citation
Leather/Foy
MRID 105007738
Leather"
MRID #05002878
See Footnote 1
See Footnote 2
See Footnote 3
See Footnote 3
See Footnote 3
See Footnote 3
MRID 100003478
MRID 800003523
, 00003435,
Must Additional Data be
Submitted under FIFRA
3(c)(2)(B>? If so, months
allowed for submission
from published date of
standard
No
NO
No
No
No
No
NO
No
No
00003536, 00004175, 00003434, 00003433.
These data requirements are current as of June, 1981.
packaqe for 'updated requirements.
Refer to guidance
-------
163.72-3
163.72-4
163.72-5
163.72-6
Table 1 (Cont'd)
Bifenox Ecological Effects (See Chapter VIII)
Generic Data Requirements
Guidelines
Citation
163.72-1
163.72-2
Name of
Test
Fish Acute LC5Q
Acute Toxicity to
Are Data
Required
Yes
Yes
0
Composition
Technical Grade
Technical Grade
Does EPA Have
Data to Partially
or totally Satisfy
this Requirement
NO*'
NO!/
Must Additional Data be
Submitted under FIFRA
3(c)(2)(B)? If so, months
allowed for submission
Bibliographic from published date of
Citation standard
Yes/8 mos.
Yes/8 mos.
Aquatic Invertebrates
Acute Toxicity to
Estaurine and
Marine Organisms
Embryolarvae and
Life-cycle Studies
of Fish and Aquatic
Invertebrates
Aquatic Organism
Toxicity and Residue
Studies
Simulated or Actual
Field Testing for
Aquatic Organisms
Yes
Technical Grade
No*/
Yes/8 mos.
Reserved
Reserved
Reserved
V The requirement for submission of these data is currently reserved pending the results of the following tests: Fish Acute l£cnt
Acute Toxicity to Aquatic Invertebrates.
_2/ Six studies (contained in 3 reference^ were evaluated and reviewed and found to be unacceptable for use in establishing the acute
toxicity of bifenox to freshwater fish (warmwater or coldwater).
_3/ The guideline requirements for an LE>cn on aquatic invertebrates with technical bifenox have not been satisfied.
4/ No studies wore submitted on technical bifenox. The guideline requirements for an LCcn on estaurine and marine organisms have
not been satisfied.
"50
These data requirements are current as of June, 1981.
package for updated requirements.
Refer to guidance
-------
Table 1 (Cont'd)
*
Bifenox Ecological Effects (See Chapter VIII)
Generic Data Requirements
Guidelines
Citation
163.71-1
163.71-2
163.71-3
i
V 163.71-4
163.71-5
Must Additional Data be
Submitted under FIFRA
Does EPA Have 3(c)(2)(B)7 If so, months
Data to Partially allowed for submission
Name of Are Data : or totally Satisfy Bibliographic from published date of
Test Required Composition this Requirement Citation standard
Avian Single-Dose Yes Technical Grade No-' Yes/8 mos.
Oral LD5fl
Avian Dietary Yes Technical Grade No- Yes/8 nos .
^50
Mammalian Acute No No
Tbxicity
Avian Reproduction No No
Simulated and Actual No No
Field Testing for
Mammals and Birds
I/ The submitted data are IBT data and are considered invalid for purposes of this standard. The Canadian
government is validating IBT data for EPA. Consult with EPA Laboratory Audit Program prior to initiating
studies.
These data requirements are current as of June, 1981. Refer to guidance
package for updated requirements.
-------
Table 1 (Cont'd)
Bifenox Ecological Effects (See Chapter VIII)
Generic Data Requirements for Bifenox by Composition Characteristics
L/O
ro
Does EPA Have
Data to Partially
Guidelines Name of Are Data or totally Satisfy
Citation Test Required Composition this Requirement
163.122-1 Seed Germination Yes No
163.122-1 vegetative Vigor Yes Yes
163.122-2 Aquatic Macrophytes Yes No
163.122-2 Algae Yes tto
I/ Data requirements must be fulfilled within 2 years using technical bifenox.
2/ This requirement is satisfied by the following studies in aggregate: 00003364,
~ 00003379,, 00003381, 00003384, 00003387, 00003402, 00003404, 00003408, 00003410,
00003415, 00003450, 00003453, 00003462, 00003463, 00003466, 00003471, 00003472,
00003475, 00003482, 00003483, 00003484, 00003494, 00003499, 00003508, 00003520,
00003527, 00003533, 00003544, 00003546, 00003547, 00003550, 00003551, 00003553,
00003555, 00003558, 00003561, 00003571, 00004176, 00004181, 00004183, 00004185,
Must Additional Data be
Submitted under FIFRA
3(c)(2)(B)? If so, months
allowed for submission
Bibliographic from published date of
Citation standard
Yesi/
See Footnote 2 No
Yesi/
Yesi/
00004186, 00004189, 00004192, 00004194, 00004202, 00004986, 00004988, 00004989,
and 05004454.
These data requirements are current as of June, 1981.
package for updated requirements.
Refer to guidance
-------
•l&ble 2
Product Ctxjiiiistry (See Chapter IV)
Bifenox Product-Specific Data Requirements for Manufacturing-use Products
Must Additional Data be
Submitted under FIFRA
Guidelines
Citation
163.61-3
163.61-4
Hame of
Test
Product Identity
and Disclosure of
Ingredients
Description of
Are Data
Required
Yes*
yes*
Does EPA Have
Data to Partially
or totally Satisfy
Composition this Requirement
MUP All
MUP All
Manufacturing Process
163.61-5
163.61-6
,
163.61-7
163.61-8(7)
163.61-8(6)
.
163.61-8(9)
* These data r
ProJuct Chfc:u:
I/ Analytical i;/
2/ 'iV.e data was
Discussion of
Formation of
Unint. Ingredients
Declaration and
Certification of
Ingredient Limits
Product Analytical
Methods and Data
Physical State
Density or Specific
Gravity
Boiling Point
Yes*
Yes*
Yes*
Yes
Yes
No
MUP All
MUP All
MUP Partial-/
MUP All
MUP NO
-quireirents for the manufacturing-use product are satisfied by the requirements
i.stry.
•thodoloqy are needed to detect
obtained from the Confidential
3(c)(2)(B)? If so,
months
allowed for submission
Bibliographic
Citation
Mobil
MRID 800003518
Mobil
MRID #00003518
Footnote^/
flootnot^-'
Melnizek, 1972
MRID #00003522
Mobil
MRID 800003518
for the tedinical
and measure any ingredient or impurity in the intent ionally-added
Statement of Formula.
These data requirements are current
.-. ..-I--.,,,-, c.,*- .,.• i ,....-1 ....:.
as of. June, 19UJ
from published date
standard
No
No
No
No
Yes/8 mos.
No
Yes/8 mos.
. Refer to Chapter
inert ingredients.
Fit-ftr to guidance
of
IV
-------
Table 2 (Cont'd)
Product Chemistry (See Chapter IV)
Bifenox Product-Specific Data Requirements for Manufacturing-use Products
Guidelines
Citation
163.61-8(11)
163.61-8(12)
163.61-8(13)
163.61-8(14)
163.61-8(15)
163.61-8(16)'
163.61-8(17)
163.61-8(18)
Name of Are Data
Test Required
pH Yes
Storage Stability Yes
Flammability Yes
Oxidizing or Yes
Reducing Action
Explosiveness Yes
Miscibility Yesi/
2/
Viscosity Yes-'
Corrosion Yes
Characteristics
Composition
MJP
MJP
MJP
MJP
MJP
MJP
MUP
MJP
Must Additional Data be
Submitted under FIFRA
Does EPA Have 3(c)(2)(B)? If so, months
Data to Partially allowed for submission
or totally Satisfy Bibliographic from published date of
this Requirement Citation standard
No Yes/8 mos.
All Mobil No
MRID 800003523
No Yes/8 mos.
No Yes/8 mos.
No Yes/8 mos.
No
No
No Yes/8 mos.
V EC liquids only.
2/ Liquids only.
These data requirements are current as of June, 1981. Refer to guidance
package for updated requirements.
-------
• Cable 2 (Cont'd)
Bifenox Toxicology (See Chapter VI)
Product-Specific Data Requirements for Manufacturing-Use Products
Guidelines
Citation
163.81-1
163.81-2
163.81-3
163.81-4
163.81-5
163.81-6
Must Additional Data be
Submitted under FIFRA
Does EPA Have 3(c)(2)(B)? If so, months
Data to Partially allowed for submission
Name of Are Data or totally Satisfy Bibliographic fron published date of
Test Required Composition this Requirement Citation standard
Acute Oral Yes* MJP No Yes/8 mos.
Toxicity
Acute Dermal Yes* MJP No Yes/8 mos.
Toxicity
Acute Inhalation Yes* MJP No Yes/8 mos.
Toxicity
, Primary Eye Yes* MJP No Yes/8 mos.
Irritation
Primary Dermal Yes * MJP No Yes/8 mos.
Irritation
Dermal Yes* MJP No Yes/8 mos.
Sensitization
* The technical and the manufacturing-use have been determined to be the same. These requirements may be filled by data
'required in Table 1 entitled "Bifenox Toxicology Generic Data Requirements."
These data requirements are current as of June, 1981. Refer to guidance
package for updated requirements.
-------
CO
a\
Table 3
Product Chemistry (See Chapter IV)
Product-Specific Data Requirements for End-Use products
Guidelines
Citation
163.61-3
163.61-4
163.61-5
163.61-6
163.61-7
163.61-8(1)
163.61-8(2)
163.61-8(7)
163.61-8(8)
163*61-8(9)
Name of Are Data
Test Required
Product Identity Yes
and Disclosure of
Ingredients
Description of Yes
Manufacturing Process
Discussion of Yes
Formation of
Unint. Ingredients
Declaration and Yes
Certification of
Ingredient Limits
Product Analytical Yes
Method and Data
Color Yes
Cflor Yes
Physical State Yes
Density or Specific Yes
Gravity
Boiling Point No
Must Additional Data be
Submitted under FIFRA
Does EPA Have 3(c)(2)(B)? If so, months
Data to Partially allowed for submission
• or totally Satisfy Bibliographic from published date of
Composition this Requirement Citation ~" standard
Each product All Mobil , No
MRID #00003519^
Each product All Mobil . No
MRID $QQQ03519=f
Each product All Mobil _. No
MRID (tOOOOSSlS^
Each product No Yes/8 mos.
Each product No Yes/8 mos.
Each product No Yes/8 mos.
Each product No Yes/8 mos.
Each product All Mobil No
,. MRID #00003523
Each product Partiali' Mobil Yes/8 mos.
MRID 00003523
I/ Data requirements have been satified for the EC, 75% wettable powder and flowable. Data are required for the 80% wettable powder.
2/ Some of the data was obtained fron the Confidential Statement of Ingredients.
These data requirements ace current as of June, 1981. Refer to guidance
package for updated requirements.
-------
Table 3 (Cont'd)
Bifenox Product Chemistry (S2e Chapter IV)
Product-Specific Data Requirements for End-Use Products
Guidelines
Citation
163.61-8(10)
163.61-8(11)
163.61-8(12)
163.61-8(13)
163.61-8(14)
163.61-8(15)
163.61-8(16)
163.61-8(17)
163.61-8(18)
Name of
Test
Vapor Pressure
PH
Storage Stability
Flaimvability
Oxidizing or
Reducing Action
Explosiveness
Miscibility
Viscosity
Corros ion
Characteristics
Are Data
Required
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Composition
Each product
Each product—''
Each product
Each product-
Each product
Each product
Each product
Each product—'
Each product
Does EPA Have
Data to Partially
or totally Satisfy
this Requirement
All
NO
All
Ito
ND
NO
Partial*
NO
partial**
Bibliographic
Citation
See Footnote 4
See Footnote *)
MRID 00003523
MRID 00003523
*
See Footnote^'
See Footnote *»
See ^ootnote "
Must Additional Data be
Submitted under FIFRA
3(c)(2)(B)? If so, months
allowed for submission
from published date of
standard
No
Yes/8 mos.
Mo
Yes/8 mos.
Yes/8 mos.
Yes/8 mos.
Yes/3 mos.
Yes/8 mos.
Yes/8 mos.
* Data are require on emulsifiable liquids only. Data is needed on the EC.
** Data requirements have been satisfied for the EC. Data are required on the 4 flowable and WP.
I/ Data requirements have been satisfied for the EC and flowable. Data are required on the 75 and 80% wettable powder.
2/ Data requir<;-nonts have been satisfied for the EC and WP. Additional data are required on the 4 flowable.
3/ Data requirements have been satisfied for the EC and WP. Additional data are required on the 4 flowable.
4/ The data was obtained from the Confidential Statement of Formula.
'Ihese data requirements are current as of June, 1981. Refer to guidance
package for updated requirements.
-------
Table 3 (Cont'd)
Bifenox Toxico'logy (See Chapter VI)
Product-Specific Data Requirements for End-Use Products
Guidelines Name of Are Data
Citation Test Required
1. Wettable Powder (80%)
163.81-1 Acute Oral Yes
Toxicity
163.81-2 Acute Dermal Yes
Taxicity
163.81-3 Acute Inhalation Yes
, Ttoxicity
LO
CO
1 163.81-4 ' Primary Eye Yes
Irritation
163.81-5 Primary Dermal Yes
Irritation
163.81-6 Dermal Yes
Sensitization
Must Additional Data be
Submitted under FIFRA
Does EPA Have 3(c)(2)(B)? If so, months
Data to Partially allowed for submission
or totally Satisfy Bibliographic from published date of
Composition this Requirement Citation standard
Each Product-7' No Yes/8 mos.
Each Product-/ No Yes/8 mos.
Each Product-/ No Yes/8 mos.
Each Product-/ No Yes/8 mos.
Each Product-^-/ No Yes/8 mos.
Each Product-/ No Yes/8 mos.
I/ Each product or substantially similar product.
These data requirements are current as of June, 1981. Refer to guidance
package for updated requirements.
-------
Table 3 (Cont'd)
Bifenox Toxicology (See Chapter VI)
Product-Specific Data Requirements for End-Use Products
Guidelines Name of Are Data
Citation Test Required
2. Emulsifiable Concentrate (21%)
163.81-1 flcute Oral Yes
Toxicity
163.81-2 flcute Dermal Yes
•toxic ity
i 163.81-3 Acute Inhalation Yes
to Tbxicity
163.81-4 , Primary Eye Yes
Irritation
163.81-5 Primary Dermal Yes
Irritation
163.81-6 Dermal Yes
Sens itizat ion
Must Additional Data be
Submitted under FIFRA
Does EPA Have 3(c)(2)(B)? If so, months
Data to Partially allowed for submission
or totally Satisfy Bibliographic from published date of
Composition this Requirement Citation standard
Each product No Yes/8 mos.
Each product No Yes/8 mos.
Each product Mo Yes/8 mos.
Each product No Yes/8 mos.
Each product No Yes/8 mos.
Each product No Yes/8 mos.
I/ Each product or substantially similar product.
These data requirements are current as of June, 1981. Refer to guidance
package for updated requirements.
-------
Table 3 (Cont'd)
Bifenox Toxicology (See Chapter VI)
Product-Specific Data Requirements for End-Use Products
Guidelines
Citation
3. Plowable
163.81-1
163.81-2
l
f. 163.81-3
163.81-4
163.81-5
163.81-6
Name of Are Data
Test Required
(-10%)
Acute Oral Yes
Tbxicity
Acute Dermal Yes
Toxicity
Acute Inhalation Yes
Toxicity
Primary Eye Yes
Irritation
Primary Dermal Yes
Irritation
Dermal • Yes
Sensitization
Must Additional Data be
Submitted under FIFRA
Does EPA Have 3(c)(2)(B)? If so, months
Data to Partially allowed for submission
or totally Satisfy Bibliographic fron published date of
Composition this Requirement . Citation standard
Each Product.^ No Yes/8 mos.
Each Product^/ No Yes/8 mos.
Each Product— No Yes/8 mos.
Each Product-/ No Yes/8 mos.
Each Producti' No Yes/8 mos.
Each Product^ No Yes/8 mos.
I/'Each product or substantially similar product.
These data requirements are current as of June, 1981. Refer to guidance
package for updated requirements.
-------
Table 3 (Cont'd)
Ecological Effects (See Chapter VIII) Product-Specific
Data Requirements for End-use Products
i
-tr
Guidelines
Citation
1 . Wettable
163.72-1
163.72-2
163.72-3
Name of Are Data.
Test Required
Powder (80%)
Fish Acute IAjQ
Acute Toxicity to
Aquatic Invertebrates
Acute Toxicity to
Estaurine and
Marine Organisms
Yes
Yes
Yes
Composition
Each product
Each product
Each product
2. Bnulsifiable Concentrate (21%)
163.72-1
163.72-2
163.72-3
3. Flowable
163.72-1
163.72-2
163.72-3
Fish Acute iJCcQ
Acute Toxicity to
Aquatic Invertebrates
Acute Toxicity to
Estaurine and
Marine Organisms
(-30%)
Fish Acute 1C,-
Acute Toxicity to
Aquatic invertebrates
Acute Toxicity to
hstaurine and Marine
Organisms
Yes
Yes
Yes
yes
Yes
Yes
Each product
Each product
Each product
Each product
Each product
Each product
Must Additional Data be
Submitted under FIFRA
Does EPA Have 3(c)(2)(B)? If so, months
Data to Partially allowed for submission
or totally Satisfy Bibliographic from published date of
this Requirement Citation standard
Noi/ Yes/8 mos.
No= Yes/8 mos.
No Yes/8 mos.
No^' Yes/8 mos.
No Yes/8 mos.
N>/ Yes/8 mos.
No?/ Yes/8 mos.
Yes LeBlanc , 1976 No
^. MRID #00003366
Partial-7 Hollister, 1976 Yes/8 mos.
MKID 00003367
I/ The direct .-.: j.-lication of bifenox to water (rice use) poses a potential hazard to aquatic organisms. These data are needed to
~~ assess this potential hazard.
2/ Additional acute toxicity data are needed on the 40% flowable product.
3/ The 96-hour . ,-ute toxicity on pink shrimp was submitted (LCcn = 2.6 ppm. ftowever, an ICcn study on an estuarine fish,
"~ and a 48-hour oyster euibryolarva study are still required.
These data requirements are current as of June, 1981. Refer to guidance
package for updated requirements.
-------
IV. PRODUCT CHEMISTRY
A. INTRODUCTION
FIFRA 3(c)(2)(A) requires the Agency to establish guidelines
for registering pesticides in the United States. The Agency
requires registrants to provide quantitative data on all
unintentional ingredients which are equal to or greater than
0.1% of the product by weight.
To establish the composition of products proposed for
registration, the Agency requires :data and information
not only on the manufacturing and formulation processes,
but also a discussion on the formation of manufacturing
impurities and other product ingredients, intentional
and unintentional. Further, to assure that the composition
of the product as marketed will not vary from the composition
evaluated at the time of registration, applicants are .
required to submit a statement certifying upper and lower
composition limits for the added ingredients and upper
limits only for some unintentional ingredients. Guidelines
Subpart D (43 FR 29696) suggests specific precision limits
for ingredients based on the percentage of ingredient
and the standard deviation of the analytical method.
In addition to the data on product composition, the Agency
also requires data to establish the physical and chemical
properties of both the pesticide active ingredient and its
formulations. For example, data are needed concerning the
identity and physical state of the active ingredient (e.g.,
melting point data, ambient vapor pressure and so-lubi 1 i ty).
Data are also required on the properties of the formulated
.pr.oduct to establish 1 abel i ng. caut io ns (e.g., f 1 ammabi 1 i ty/,
corrosivity and storage stability). The agency uses these
data to characterize each pesticide and to determine its
environmental and health hazards.
B. PRODUCT CHEMISTRY - MANUFACTURING-USE BIFENQX
product Chemi stry Profile
1. Chemical Identity
Bifenox is the accepted common name for methyl
5-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)-2-nitrobenzoate. It is also known
by the trade name Modown . Other chemical names include:
benzoic acid, 5-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)-2-nitro-, methyl ester
(8, 9 CI), and 2 ,4-Dichlorophenyl 3'-methoxycarbonyl-4'-n1tro-
phenyl ether.
The chemical structure is: _..
.
-------
The chemical formula for bifenox is Ci/iHgClpNOc
and the molecular weight is 342.12. The Chemicial Abstracts
Registry (CAS) number for bifenox is 42576-02-3 (formerly
12680-11-4), and the EPA Shaughnessy Number is 104301.
The common name bifenox will be used routinely in this
registration standard in lieu of trade and other names.
2. Manufacturing Process
Bifenox can be made by the reaction of potassium
2 ,4-dichlorophenolate with methyl 5-chloro-2-nitrobenzoate
(Martin and Worthing, MRID 05000993). Chemicals of the
type of bifenox "are readily prepared by the Ullman (sic)
ether synthesis reaction between the alkali metal (Na,K)
salt of a halophenol and a 5-halo (Cl or Br)-2-nitro-
benzoic acid or an ester, amide, or salt thereof. The
5-halo-2-nitrobenzoic acid is readily prepared by nitrating
an m-halo-toluene followed by oxidation of the methyl group
by well known procedures" (Sittig, 1977). The company has
submitted data on its manufacturing process. These data are
included in Confidential Appendix A.
The Farms Chemical Handbook (1980) lists the Mobil Chemical
Company as the only basic producer of bifenox in the
United States.
3. Formation of Unintentional Impurities
Data identifying impurities in the technical product have
been submitted but cannot be discussed because of its
confidentiality. These data are found in Confidential
Appendix A.
4. Active Ingredient Limits in Pesticide Products
Manufacturing-Use Bifenox
The active ingredient limits for technical bifenox contains
a minimum of 96% of the active ingredient, methyl
5-(2 ,4-dichlorophenoxy)-2-nitrobenzoate. Depending upon the
manufacturing process, up to 4% related impurities can be
expected. Because of its confidentiality, submitted
data identifying impurities in the technical product
and a discussion of the specific procedures, equipment and
manufacturing conditions required for the commercial produc-
tion of bifenox will not be discussed or included in this
Standard.
-------
End Use Products
The intentionally added inert ingredients of the end use
products are exempt from the requirements of a tolerance under
40 CFR 180.1001 (c) and (d). These data are to be found in
Confidential Appendix B.
5. Product Analytical Method
The analytical method (Mobil Chemical Method 69-72) is
considered an adequate method for bifenox and is in compliance
with section 163.61-7(a)(3) of the Proposed Guidelines.
However, there are no methods for the unintentional ingredients,
C. PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
1. Available data from the open literature and registrant
submissions on the physical/chemical properties of technical
bifenox are:
Color Pale yellow to tan (00003518)
Odor Faint (00003518)
Melting point 84-86°C (00003518)
Physical state ---- Crystalline solid (00003518)
Vapor pressure 2.4 x 10~6 mm Hg at 30°C
(00003518)
Stability Heat stable to 175°C, loses
weight to 285°C, total decom-
position occurs above 290°C
(00003518)
' ' Solubility - - - --(00003518)
Sol vent Approximate % (at 20°C)
Corn Oil 3-4
Methanol 2
Xyl ene 30
Methyl Isoamyl Ketone 25
Methyl Chloride 50
Pine Oil 2-3
Chiorobenzene 35-40
Ethylene Dichloride 40
Methyl Methacrylate 35-40
Kerosene, other aliphatics <1
Mesityl Oxide 40-50
Isophorone 20-40
Cyclohexanone 40-50
Diacetone alcohol 16-20
1,4-Dioxane 10-15
Water 0.36 ppm
-------
2. The following physical/chemical properties for manufac-
turing-use bifenox are:
Physical state Crystalline solid (00003518)
Storage stability Technical bifenox stored at
20-30°C for 52 weeks showed
no loss of active ingredient
(00003523)
3. Available data on the physical/chemical properties on
the end-use products are:
80% Wettable Powder
Physical state Solid (00003523)
75% Wettable Powder
Physical state Solid (00003523)
Density 24 Ibs./cu.ft.
4 Flowable
Physical state Liquid (00003523)
Density 10 Ibs./gal.
pH 7
Flash point greater than 200
Emulsifiable Concentrate
Physical state Liquid (00003523)
Density 9.63 Ibs./gal.
Flammability 94°F (TOC)
Viscosity 2.03 cp at 25°C
Storage stability The formulation is stable for
... 12 weeks at 50°C (00003523)
Corrosion —? Not corrosive to stainless
Characteristics steel or aluminum, but corrosive
to the extent of 0.8 mils/year
to carbon steel, and 0.6
mils/year to brass
D. SUMMARY OF_ DATA GAPS
1. Technical Bifenox
The data gaps for technical bifenox are solubility,
octanol/water partition coefficient, density or specific:
gravity and pH.
-45-
-------
2. Manufacturing-Use Bifenox
The data gaps for manufacturing-use bifenox are product
analytical methods, density or specific gravity, pH,
f1ammabi1ity, oxidizing or reducing action, explosiveness,
and corrosion characteristics.
3. End Use Products
The data gaps for the end use products are color, odor,
density or specific gravity (80 WP only), pH (75 and 80%
WP), flammability (4F), oxidizing or reducing action,
explosiveness, miscibility (EC only), viscosity (4F) and
corrosion characteristics (4F, WP).
In addition, the following will be required for each product:
a description of analytical methods for the determination of
each identified impurity associated with the technical product;
declaration and certification of the upper and lower limits
for each active ingredient and intentionally added inert
ingredients, and the upper limit of each impurity, reaction
and degradation products based on representative samples.
-46-
-------
V. ENVIRONMENTAL FATE
A. USE PROFILE
Bifenox is a selective herbicide used in preemergence
or postemergence treatments to control many annual
broadleaf and certain grass weeds. Registered use sites
include soybeans, rice, grain sorghum, field corn, wheat,
and forest tree nursery seedbeds.
Bifenox apparently acts by inhibition of photosynthesis
or plant respiration. At recommended rates, it is
herbicidally active for 6 to 8 weeks in the soil. All
formulations are applied in a water carrier without additional
sufactants at volumes of 10 to 50 gallons per acre, depending
on crop, target weeds, and method of application.
Principal target weeds in rice fields include annual sedge,
barnyardgrass, dayflower, ducksalad, redstem, hemp sesbania,
sprangletop, and water hyssop. Target weeds in other
sites include jimsonweed, 1ambsquarters, pigweed, smartweed,
velvetleaf, morningglory, and teaweed. Bifenox is seldom
used for control of hard-to-kill perennial or woody weeds.
There are currently five bifenox formulations, including
the technical product. All are single active ingredient
formulations. They include two wettable powders containing
75% and 80% active ingredient, a 40% flowable concentrate,
and a 21% emulsifiable concentrate. Currently, the most
frequently used products are the 80% wettable powder and the
40% flowable concentrate.
More than one-half of current bifenox production is used
on soybean, mostly in the Midwestern states. Treatments are
either broadcast or applied in bands by ground rig boom
sprayers. Bifenox is applied to soybeans mostly as a
preemergence treatment, although some preplant treatments
are made. Tank mixes with the herbicides alachlor or
trifluralin are frequently used.
About 25% to 30% of bifenox production is used for treatment
of rice in the South. Both preemergence and postemergence
treatments are usually applied by air, although preemergence
treatments are occasionally broadcast by ground rig booms.
Postemergence treatments are usually tank-mixed with the
herbicide propanil, while preemergence treatment is done
with bifenox alone.
-47-
-------
A small portion of bifenox production is used on field
corn and grain sorghum in the Midwest. It is applied to
these sites as a preemergence broadcast treatment by ground
rig booms. Bifenox may be tank-mixed with the herbicide
propachlor for use on sorghum or with the herbicide alachlor
for use on corn.
About 2% of bifenox production is used to control weeds in
forest tree nursery seedbeds. Principal use areas are
conifer plantations in the South and West. Bifenox is
applied postemergence by ground rig boom sprayers to young
conifer seedlings.
Bifenox, though registered for use on wheat, is not currently
used on that crop. According to label instructions, bifenox
should be applied as a postemergence broadcast treatment
to wheat having from 2 to 4 leaves. Either aerial or
ground application may be used.
Additional information about bifenox application on its
registered use-sites is contained in Table 1.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL FATE - MANUFACTURING-USE BIFENOX
1. Environmental Fate Summary
Bifenox is hydrolyzed under acidic (pH 4.7) conditions
to 5-(2',4'-dichlorophenoxy)-2-nitrobenzoic acid and methyl-5-
(2 ' ,4'-dichlorophenoxy)anthrani1 ate. Ten potential degra-
dation products were identified that may be contaminants in the
st.arti.ng . material , or the result, of hydrolysis . or photolysis.
The products are:
3-Carboxymethyl-4-nitrophenol
3'-Hydroxy-4'-nitro-2,4-di chloro-di phenyl ether
3 '-Carboxymethyl-4'-nitro-2,4-dichloro-6-hydroxy-di phenyl ether
3'-Carboxymethyl-4'-hydroxy-2,4-dichloro-di phenyl ether
3'-Carboxymethyl-4'-amino-2,4-dichloro-diphenyl ether
2,4-Dichlorophenol
jD-Ni trophenol
3'-Hydroxy-4 '-nitro-2-hydroxy-4-chloro-di phenyl ether
3 '-Hydroxy-4 '-ami no-2,4-di hydroxy-di phenyl ether
Ni trofen
(Mobil 1976, MRID 00003543)
Laboratory data indicate that bifenox had a half-life
in Anjyo (mineral soil, Kaolin), Tochigi (volcanic ash
soil, allophane), and Nagano (mineral soil montmorillonite)
soils of 2-4 days under flooded conditions and a half-life
of 6 days under aerobic conditions. (Ohyama, Kuwatsuka,
1975, MRID 05005107)
-48-
-------
TABLE 1 - Registered Application Rates of Bifenox
Site
Formulation
Appl i cat ion
Method
1
Application rate
(1b. or oz. a.i.)
Soybeans
Ri ce
Grai n
Sorghum
Forest tree
nursery
seedbeds
Field Corn*
Wheat*
•>
WP
F
EC*
WP
F
EC
WP
F
WP
F
EC
WP
F
EC
Preplant or 1.2-2.0 Ibs. A. I. /A
preemergence
broadcast, band,
or incorporate
Preemergence or 2.0-3.0 Ibs. A.I./A /
Postemergence
Broadcast
Preemergence 1.5-2.0 Ibs. A.I. /A
Broadcast
Preemergence 3.0 Ibs. A. I. /A
or
Postemergence 3.0 Ibs. A. I. /A
after seedlings
are 4 wks. ol d
Preemergence 1.6-2.0 Ibs. A. I. /A
broadcast
Postemergence 0.7-1.0 Ib. A.I./A2/3
Broadcast
In pounds of active ingredient per acre.
2
Aerial
Ground
*Not currently marketed for this site in the United States.
-49-
-------
In sandy loam and loam soils the half-life of bifenox
was 3-14 days. At 6 weeks after treatment, 0.06-0.11 ppm
(4-11% of the chemical applied) remained in the sandy loam
soils and 0.12-0.21 ppm (11-16% of the chemical aplied)
remained in the loam soil. A metabolite [methyl-5-
(2 ,4-dichlorophenoxy) anthrani1 ate] was found in the sandy
loam soil at a concentration of 0.12 ppm. These data indicate
that bifenox will not present a persistence problem in soil;
however, without field data, the true rate of bifenox soil
dissipation cannot be determined (Mobil 1972, MRID 00003427,
28; 1978, MRID 00003358).
Data from a nitrification study indicate that bifenox
at 31 ppm inhibits nitrification in clay soils for at least
60 days. This may be beneficial in rice fields since rice
plants take up NHL instead of NO-. However, 31 ppm is
far in excess of the maximum recommended application rate
of 1.5 ppm.
A sludge study shows that bifenox is degraded in sewage
sludge with approximately two-thirds of the bifenox present
in the effluent at zero time degrading in 4 hours (pseudo-
first-order rate constant -0.26/hour). (Greer, 1978, MRID
05020066).
A study using a clay loam soil indicated that bifenox
and two transformation products 5-(2 ' ,4'-dichlorophenoxy)-2-
nitrobenzoic acid (a hydrolysis product) and 2,'4'-
dichlorophenyl-4-nitrophenyl ether (nitrofen) will leach in
soil to a depth of 40 centimeters. However, since the soil
was eluted with the equivalent of 332 acre-inches of water,
f irm ..concl usi ons cannot, be drawn from.the .data.. (Leather ......
and Foy, 1977, MRID #05002738)
Preliminary data from an aquatic field dissipation study
conducted in a rice field treated with 2 or 4 Ib/A show that
bifenox residue levels decreased from 0.007 and 0.13 ppm,
respectively, on the date the field was flooded (18 days
after treatment) to nondetectable levels of less than 0.005
ppm at 7 days after flooding (25 days after treatment).
Mosquito fish placed in a model ecosystem 30 days after
treatment with bifenox accumulated to 0.024 ppm of bifenox
(accumulation factor 50) over a 3-day period. (Lee et at.,
1976, MRID 05002741)
-50-
-------
Bifenox was applied alone and in combination with alachlor,
propanil, and propachlor to sandy loam and loam soils. When
bifenox was applied alone, 79-96% of the compound dissipated
from the sandy loam and loam soils within 6 weeks. Similar
results (73-95% dissipation) were observed when bifenox was
applied in combination with alachlor, propachlor, or propanil.
Thus, the dissipation rate of bifenox in the environment is
not expected to change when it is applied in combination
with these compounds. (Mobil MRID 00003327, 3358).
Bifenox residues will accumulate in greenhouse-grown
oats. Residues of [14C] bifenox in oats 310 days after
treatment included 5-(2',4'-dichlorophenoxy)-2-nitrobenzoic
acid, nitrofen, and 5-(2',4'-dichlorophenoxy)anthrani1ic
acid. (Leather & Foy, 1977, MRID #05002738)
Although the data are insufficient to form a comprehensive
profile of the fate of bifenox in the environment, it can be
concluded that bifenox should not present a persistence
problem in soil when used alone or in combination with
alachlor, propachlor, propanil. The dissipation of bifenox
in soil appears to be through hydrolysis to
5-(2 ' ,4'-dichlorophenoxy)-2-nitrobenzoic acid and methyl-5-
(2 ' ,4'-dichlorophenoxy) anthrani1 ate. However, a trans-
formation product (2 ,4-dichlorophenyl-4-nitrophenyl ether,
the herbicide nitrofen, appears to be a microbial degradation
product of bifenox (based on the structural differences
between nitrofen and bifenox). Therefore, microbial degradation
must still be considered as a possible degradation pathway.
The impact of bifenox on the aquatic environment cannot
be determined because the rate of hydrolysis is not known.
In addition, the structures of the two hydrolysis products
are similar to bifenox, which suggests that they may have
similar influences on the environment.
C. EXPOSURE PROFILE
1. All Formulations
The greatest potential for exposure to bifenox occurs
during mixing, loading, and spraying operations, but no
data are available to estimate the degree of such exposure.
Aerial applications may potentially expose humans, livestock
and wildlife outside the application site via spray drift.
A potential exposure to wildlife exists because of bifenox
use on grains and to aquatic species because of use on
rice. Exposure resulting from groundwater contamination is
unlikely due to the fairly rapid soil metabolism of bifenox
-51-
-------
and its low leaching potential. The potential for leaching
of the degradation products cannot be assessed from available
data. A bioaccumulation factor of 50 was reported in mosquito
fish after 3 days in a static model ecosystem. No other
bioaccumulation data are available.
v
The greatest potential for exposure of wettable powder
formulations is respiratory, during opening and pouring
when "puff back" can occur. Splashing during dilution,
mixing, and loading may result in dermal or ocular exposure.
Potential dermal exposure of the flowable and emulsi-
fiable concentate formulations is greatest during mixing
and loading, when splashing may occur. Such exposure
can be minimized by the use of gloves and protective clothing
during mixing and loading.
0. SUMMARY OF DATA GAPS
The data gaps for this chemical are: hydrolysis studies.
photolysis studies, aerobic soil metabolism studies, aerobic
and anaerobic aquatic metabolism, leaching studies, adsorption/
desorption studies, water dispersal studies, terrestrial
field, aquatic dissipation studies, rotational and irrigated
crop studies, and fish accumulation studies.
The data requiremnts for manufacturing-use bifenox and the
end use products are the same. Refer to Chapter III,
Table 1.
-52-
-------
VI. TOXICOLOGY
The Proposed Guidelines for Registering Pesticides in the
United States sets forth conditions under which specific
data would be required to support the registration of a
product, specifying the standards for acceptable testing.
Toxicity data needed to determine potential adverse
toxi col ogi cal effects to humans and domestic animals as a
result of the use of bifenox were generated by Industrial
Bio-Test Laboratories (IBT) or were not available to the
Agency.
IBT was one of the laboratories audited jointly by the EPA
and the Food and Drug Administration under the Agency's
Laboratory Audit Program. The function of this program was
to ensure the reliability and integrity of data supplied to
the Agency by pesticide manufacturers for purposes of
supporting pesticide registrations and tolerances. The
audit of the IBT Laboratories revealed a number of questionable
scientific practices which led the Agency to require raw
data for purposes of reevaluating all IBT studies used in
support of pesticide registrations and tolerances. Review
of the IBT toxicology data base on bifenox currently is
being conducted by the Canadian government. Under the
Registration Standards Program, Agency • policy provides
that IBT studies which have not yet been reviewed are
considered administratively invalid and will not be included
in the Registratiqn Standard document. Thus, in the absence
of the Canadian validation'and the lack of any other toxicology
data on bifenox, a detailed assessment of the hazard of
bifenox to man and the environment cannot be made.
The data requirements needed to evaluate the continued
registration of bifenox products to which this standard
applies are listed in Chapter III, Tables 1-3.
-53-
-------
VII. RESIDUE CHEMISTRY
A. INTRODUCTION
This chapter of the Registration Standard is concerned
only with those formulations containing a single active
ingredient. Conclusions or implications derived from data
on such formulations do not necessarily apply to those
having mutiple active ingredient.
The use pattern and restrictions for the formulations
(F, EC and WP) of bifenox are used primarily for
pre-emergent and some post-emergent weed control. This
chemical is said to be particularly effective against
broadleaf weeds.
According to current labels, the following additional
instructions and restrictions apply when end-use products
are used:
1. Reduce dosage in proportion to band
areas actually treated.
2. Pre-emergence applications are not
incorporated in the soil.
3. Post-emergence applications are made
when the first leaves appear.
* ti ' ,
4. Cover crops can be planted if not grazed.
Specifically for rice:
1. Do not apply to second rice crop in areas
where double cropping is practiced.
2. Do not use in areas where crayfish farming
is practiced.
3. Do not use water from treated rice fields
to irrigate upland crops.
-------
5, Do not use bifenox on rice grown in
California.
Specifically for sorghum:
1. Do not use bifenox on sweet sorghum or sorghum
sudan.
B. RESIDUE CHEMISTRY PROFILE
The absorption, translocation and metabolism in plants have
been investigated thoroughly in rice, corn, soybeans, and
other plants. The metabolism of bifenox is adequately
understood to be via reduction and/or hydrolysis to the
corresponding amine and/or acid, followed by cleavage of the
ether linkage to form various phenols which are further
degraded and/or "bound", probably as gylcoside conjugates.
Degradates include 2 ,4-dichlorophenol and p-nitrophenol.
14
C- metabolism data from a study on soybeans indicate
little or no transl ocation from the plant root. Maximum
C- activity in leaves, stems and beans had an absorptivity
level of only 0.03 ppm in tracer studies of wheat and rice
involving foliar sprays of C- materials. At the use
rate, low levels of <0.05 ppm were found. Bifenox was found
to metabolize rapidly in the rice plants.
1 4
Studies with rats fed C- tagged bifenox and dogs
fed cold bifenox showed little tissue accumulation. Large
amounts of degradation or me.tabol,ism pro.ducts were found i.n
the liquid and solid waste of the dogs. Bifenox is rapidly
metabolized and almost totally eliminated. Radio tracer
studies on rats showed 90% of bifenox is eliminated within
48 hours.
Residue data from various crops treated at use rate and
in excess of use rate showed <0.05 ppm, the practical method
sensitivity. Adequate methods are available for residue
determination and for enforcement purposes.
Residue studies on corn, rice, sorghum, soybeans, barley,
oats, and wheat show that bifenox residues do not exceed the
established pesticide tolerance of 0.05 ppm.
-55-
-------
Since there was no evidence of bifenox residues in the
animal feed items at the practical sensitivity (0.05 ppm) of
the method there is no reasonable expectation of residues in
meat, milk, or poultry and eggs.
There is no report of any regulatory action taken by
the Food and Drug Administration with respect to residues
of bifenox.
All residue data submitted for bifenox were obtained
by the use of Mobil Chemical Method 70-72. This method
consists of acetonitrile extraction, hexane partitioning,
clean-up on mixed Fl orisi1/alumina/Florex AA-LMV column
followed by sweep co-distillation, and measurement by
GLC equipped with halogen-specific microcoulmetric detection.
The Florex-LMV is presently substituted for the specific
Florex-AA-LMV.
Mobil Chemical Method 70-72 is found to have adequate
specificity and is judged satisfactory for enforcement of
established tolerances.
Over 200 crop samples were analyzed for residues of bifenox,
using Mobil Chemical Method 70-72, sensitive to 0.05 ppm of
the chemical. Samples were obtained from herbicide tests in
17 states, in Canada, Nicaragua and the Phillipines, and
represented product use under a wide variety of climatic and
soil conditions.
C. SUMMARY OF DATA GAPS
Presently, all data requirements have been fulfilled.
Refer to Chapter III, Table 1, of this Standard.
-56-
-------
VIII. . ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS
A. ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS PROFILE
1. Fish and Wildlife
Available data are insufficient to assess the toxicologigal
effects of technical bifenox on freshwater fish (warmwater
or coldwater), freshwater aquatic invertebrates, estuarine
and marine organisms, and birds due to deviations from
acceptable protocols.
Data' submitted to the Agency for review to determine the
toxicity of bifenox to birds are IBT data. These studies
are considered administratively invalid and cannot be
included in a Registration Standard.
The 40% flowable bifenox end-use product is moderately
toxic to aquatic invertebrates. The 48 hour acute LCro
for daphnia was 1.8 mg/L and the 96 hour LCrn for p i n K
shrimp was 2.6 ppm (Le'Uanc 1976, MR ID 00003366).
Environmental fate data, chronic fish (fresh and estuarine)
and/or marine and freshwater invertebrates studies may be
required after review of the above acute toxicity studies on
technic al bi fenox.
2. PI ants - Phytotoxici ty
Emulsifiable Concentrate
Available data concerning the phytotoxic effects -of bife-nox •
emulsifiable concentrate on various crops indicate that the
no-effect levels for post-emergence application to barley,
oats, and wheat varied from less than .5 to 1 Ib. ai/A. The
no-effect level for postemergent application to rice was
less than 1 Ib. ai/A. The no-effect levels for pre-emergence
application to corn and rice varied from less than 2 to 2.5
Ib. ai/A. Sorghum suffered 10% injury following pre-emergence
applications of 1.5 to 2 Ib. ai/A and the no-effect level
for a similar application to soybeans was 1 to 2 Ib. ai/A.
-57-
-------
Flowable
The no-effect level for pre-plant incorporation (PPI) of
flowable bifenox to corn, sorghum, and soybeans, wheat, and
oats was less than 2 Ib. ai/A. At 2 Ib. ai/A PPI, alfalfa
was damaged 65% and clover 45%. The no-effect level to rice
for a pre-emergence application was less than 2.5 Ib. ai/A
and less than 2 Ib. ai/A for a post-emergence application.
Pre-emergence applications of 1.5 to 2 Ib. ai/A resulted in
a 10% injury to sorghum or soybeans, although some soybean
tests resulted in damage at rates as low as 0.5 Ib. ai/A. A
post-emergence application of 1 Ib. ai/A has no effect on
wheat.
Granular
Although the 10% granular dust is no longer manufactured,
a study showed that a 3 Ib. ai/A post-emergence application
resulted in a 10% injury to rice.
Wettable Powder
The no-effect level for pre-emergence application of
wettable powder bifenox to corn or sorghum was 1.5 Ib. ai/A
and varied from less than 1.6 to 3.75 Ib. ai/A for rice.
The no-effect level for pre-emergence treatment on soybeans
varied from less than 1 to 2 Ib. ai/A. Postemergence
application of 1 Ib. ai/A caused no injury to wheat and 1.5
Ib. ai/A caused no injury to black walnut or white pine, but
the no-effect level for a similar application to tulip
poplar was less than 0.75 Ib. The no-effect levels for
preplant incorporation treatment were 2 Ibs. ai/A for wheat
and less than 2 Ibs. for oats, sorghum, soybeans
-------
3. Non-Target PI ant
Although sufficient information exists to characterize the
hazard of bifenox to nontarget area crops, little information
is available concerning the effects to other nontarget area
plants. Bifenox is registered for use on corn, nursery
seedbeds, rice, sorghum, soybeans, and wheat. Label rates
for these crops allow for some temporary injury, but label
cautions and the acceptable nature of the injury indicate
that bifenox is not hazardous enough to these crops to be
of concern. Ninety-five percent of bifenox is currently
used on soybeans, rice and sorghum. It seems unlikely
that large areas of nontarget plants would be exposed,
although some drift to adjacent land strips resulting from
normal application patterns would be expected.
The effect of bifenox on nontarget aquatic plant cannot
be assessed at this time due to the lack of toxicity data.
C. SUMMARY OF DATA GAPS
1. Manufacturing-Use Bifenox
The ecological effects data gaps for technical bifenox are as
follows: one avian single-dose oral LD5Q (mallard duck
or bobwhite quail); two avian dietary LCcn studies
(mallard duck and bobwhite quail); two 96-hour LC5Q tests on
freshwater fish (rainbow trout and bluegill sunfiln);
one 48-hour acute toxicity study on an aquatic invertebrate
(D a p h n i a ma g n a); one estuarine and marine organism toxicity
study ("9~6-hour LCc0 oyster embryolarva or a 96-hour EC5Q
shell deposition for moMuscs)'.
The data requirements for a seed germination, aquatic
marcrophytes and algae study on technical bifenox will be
required within two years.
2. End Use Products
The ecological effects data gaps for the 80% wettable powder
and the 21% emulsifiable concentrate are fish acute LC5Q
on one coldwater (rainbow trout) and one warmwater fisn
(bluegill sunfish), a 96-hour acute toxicity test on an
aquatic invertebrate (Daphnia), estuarine and marine organisms
toxicity study (preferably 96-hour LC5Q for shrimp and
fish, and either 48-hour LC50 for embryolarvae or 96-hour
ECcn shell deposition for molluscs.
-59-
-------
Additional acute toxicity testing on the 40% flowable is
required on one coldwater fish (rainbow trout) and one
warmwater fish (bluegill), and one estuarine fish. A
48-hour oyster embryolarvae study is also required.
The data requirements needed to evaluate the continued
registration of bifenox products to which this Standard
applies are listed in Chapter III, Tables 2 and 3.
-60-
-------
GUIDE TO USE OF BIBLIOGRAPHY
-------
Guide to Use of This Bibliography
Content of Bibliography. This bibliography contains
citations of all the studies reviewed by EPA in arriving
at the positions and conclusions stated elsewhere in
this standard. The bibliography is divided into 3
sections: (1) citations that contributed information
useful to the review of the chemical and considered to
be part of the data base supporting registrations under
the standard, (2) citations examined and judged to be
inappropriate for use in developing the standard, and
(3) standard reference material. Primary sources for
studies in this bibliography has been the body of data
submitted to EPA and its predecessor agencies in support
of past regulatory decisions, and the published technical
literature.
Units of Entry. The unit of entry in this bibligraphy
is called a "study". In the case of published materials,
this corresponds closely to an article. In the case of
unpublished materials submitted to the agency, the
Agency has sought to identify documents at a level parallel
to a published article from within the typically larger
volumes in which they were submitted. The resulting
"studies" generally have a distinct title (or at least
a single subject), can stand alone for purpose of review,
and can be described with a conventional bibliographic
citation. The Agency has attempted also to unite basic
documents and commentaries upon them, treating them as a
single study.
Identification of Entries. The entries in this biblio-
graphy are sorted by author, date of the document, and
title. Each entry bears, to the left of the citation
proper, an eight-digit numeric identifier. This number
is unique to the citations, and should be used at any
time specific reference is required. This number is
called the "Master Record Identifier", or "MRID". It
is not related to the six-digit "Accession Number" which
has been used to identify volumes of submitted data; see
paragraph 4(d)(4) below for a further explanation. In a
few cases, entries added to the bibliography late in the
review may be preceded by a nine-character temporary
identifier. This is also to be used wheneer a specific
reference is needed.
-------
Form of the Entry. In addition to the Master Record
Ident i fier (MR ID:), each entry consists of a biblio-
graphic citation containing standard elements followed,
in the case of materials submitted to EPA, by a
description of th earliest known submission. The
bibliographic convention used reflect the standards
for the American National Standards Institute (ANSI),
expanded to provide for certain special needs. Some
explanatory notes of specific elements follow:
a. Author. Whenever the Agency could confidently
identify one, the Agency has chosen to show a
personal author. When no individual was identified,
the Agency has shown an identificable laboratory
or testing facility as author. As a last resort,
the Agency has shown the first known submitter
as author.
b. Document Date. When the date appears as four digits
with no question marks, the Agency took it directly
from the document. When a four-digit date is
followed by a question mark, the bibliographer
deduced the date from evidence in the document.
When the date appears as (19??), the Agency was
unable to determine or estimate the date of the
document.
c. Title. This is the third element in the citation.
In some cases it has been necessary for the Agency
bibliographers to create or enhance a document
title. Any such editorial insertions are contained
between square brackets.
d. Trailing Parenthesis. For studies submitted to us
in the past, the trailing parenthesis include (in
addition to any self-explanatory text) the following
elements describing the earliest known submission.
(1) Submi ssion Date. Immediately following the
word 'received' appears the date of the
earliest known submission.
(2) Administrative Number. The next element,
immediately following the word 'under', is
the registration number, experimental permit
number, petition number, or other administra-
tive number associated with the earliest known
submi ssi on.
-------
(3) Submitter. The third element is the submitter,
following the phrase 'submitted by1. When
authorship is defaulted to the submitter, this
element is omitted.
(4) Volume Identification. The final element in
the trailing parenthesis identifies the EPA
accession number of the volume in which the
original submission of the study appears.
The six-digit accession number follows the
symbol 'CDL1, standing for "Company Data
Library". This accession number is in turn
followed by an alphabetic suffix which shows
the relative position of the study within the
volume. For example, within accession number
123456, the first study would be 123456-A; the
second, 1234456-B; the 26th, 123456-Z; and the
27th 123456-AA.
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD.BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Considered to be Part of the
Data Base Supporting Registrations
Under the Standard
MRID CITATION
000003475 Arnold, W.E.; O'Neal, W.B. (1972) Small Grain Herbicide Screening.
(Unpublished study received May 7, 1974 under 4G1505; prepared
by South Dakota State Univ., Plant Science Dept., submitted by
Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:
093937-AU)
000004189 Bayer, D.; Goss, J., camps. (1972) 1972 Rice Weed Control Report.
(Unpublished study received May 7, 1974 under unknown admin.
no.; prepared by Univ. of. California—Davis, submitted by Mobil
Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:210036-U)
000003499 Boyles, M.; Banks, P.; Santelmann, P.W. (1976) Herbicides in Grain
Sorghum: Report No. C 76-14. (Unpublished study received Mar 9,
1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by Oklahoma State Univ. [of
Agriculture and Applied Science], submitted by Mobil Chemical
Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL-.228701-AG)
000003415 Collins, W.K. (1975) Field Evaluation Report on Tolerance of Flue-
Cured Tobacco to Modown 80 WP. (Unpublished study received Jan
29, 1976 under 2224-EX-14; prepared by North Carolina State
Univ., submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL:224669~D)
000003555 Cornell University (1975) Herbicide Field Evaluation Trials on
Field Crops, 1975. (Unpublished study received Mar 9, 1977
under 2224-EX-10; prepared by Dept. of Agronomy, Weed Control
Research, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL:228702-U)
000003462 Crane, L.E. (1973) Differential Response of Commerical Rice Vari-
eties to Rates of Modown. (Unpublished study received May 7,
1974 under 4G1505; prepared by Chocolate Bayou Land and Water
Co., submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chanicals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL:093987-AF)
000003402 Delta Branch Experiment Station (1975) Weed Control in Soybeans
with Experimental Formulations. (Unpublished study received
Oct 8, 1976 under 2224-50; submitted by Mobil Chemical Co.,
Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:226291-J)
000003558 Doersch, R.E.; Vfeis, G.; Harvey, R.G. (1975) Herbicide Performance
in Soybeans at Hancock. (Unpublished study received Mar 9, 1977
under 2224-EX-10; prepared by Univ. of Wisconsin, Dept. of
Agronomy, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL:223702-Y)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Considered to be Part of the
Data Base Supporting Registrations
Under the Standard
MRID CITATION
000004176 Eastin, E.F.; Stansel, J.W.; Flinchum, W.T.; Halpert, C.W.; Young,
J. (1973) Herbicide Field Evaluations for Rice, 1973: Report
No.7. (Unpublished study received May 7, 1974 under 4G1505;
prepared by Texas A i M Univ., Agricultural Experiment Station,
Agricultural Research St Extension Center at Beaumont, submitted
by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.;
CDL.-093987-AE)
000003546 Gorodenski, S. (1976) Mobil Modown Soybeans. (Unpublished study
received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-iO; prepared by Chomonics
Industries, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemi-
cals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:228702-B)
000003494 Gossett, B.J. (1975) Weed Control Researcn. (Unpublisned study re-
ceived Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-IO; prepared by Clemson Univ.,
Dept. of Agronomy and Soils, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co.,
Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:228701-S)
000003408 Harvey, R.G.; Jacques, G.L. (1975) Soybean Herbicide Studies: Proj-
ect No. 755. (Unpublished study received Oct 8, 1976 under
2224-50; prepared by [Univ. of Wisconsin], Dept. of Agronomy,
submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va.; CDL:226291-S) ... .,
000003381 lieikes, E. (1975) Grain Sorghum. (Unpublished study received
Dec 12, 1975 under unknown admin, no.; prepared by Colorado
State Univ., [Dept. of] Weed Science-Botany, submitted by Mobil
Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:223556-K)
000003561 Heikes, G. (1976) Linley Stum and Orville Johnson Farms Observa-
tions—September 21 & 22. (Unpublished study received Mar 9,
1977 under 2224-EX-IO; prepared by Colorado State Univ., submit-
ted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.;
CDL:228702-AC)
000004202 Heikes, G. (1976) Winter Wheat: Linley Stum Farm, Towner, Colorado.
(Unpublished study received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-IO; pre-
pared by Colorado State Univ.. submitted by Mobil Chemical Co.,
Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:228702-AD)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Considered to bo Part of the
Data Base Supporting Registrations
Under the Standard
MRID CITATION
000003367 Holiister, T.A.; Heitmullcr, T. (1976) Acute Tbxicity of Modown
Herbicide 4 Flowable to Embryos of Eastern Oysters ( Crasso-
strea virginica ), to Pink Shrimp ( Ponaeus duorarum ),
to Fiddler Crabs ( Uca pugilator ), and to Sneepshead Minnows
( Cyprinodon variegatus ): Preliminary Toxicity Test Report.
(Unpublished study received Jan 26, 1977 under 2224-53; prepared
by EG&G, Bionomics, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial
Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:223017-D)
005004454 Holt, H.A.; Wickham, S.H.; Wichman, J.R. (1976) Forest nursery
weed control results. Pages 175-177, _In Proceedings, North
G2ntral Weed Control Conference. Vol. 31. Lincoln, Nebr.:
North Central Weed Control Conference.
000003466 Isom, W.H. (1972) Weed Control Cereal Crops. (Unpublished study
received May 7, 1974 under 4G1505; prepared by Univ. of Califor-
nia—Riverside, Agricultural Extension Service, submitted by
Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:
093987-AJ)
000003520 Isom, W.H. (1973) UCR Moreno: 1973 Pre-Emergence Herbicide Test—
Cereal Crops. (Unpublished study including letter dated
Aug 23,.1973 from W.H. Isom to,John P. Lanigir, received
May 7, 1974 under unknown admin, no.; prepared by Univ. of Cali-
fornia—Riverside, Agricultural Extension Service, submitted by
Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.;
CDL.210036-AD)
000003450 Kapusta, ; Strieker, (1973) Grain Sorgnum Weed Control
Study. ""(Unpublished study received May 7, 1974 under 4G1505;
prepared by Southern Illinois Univ., Belleville Research Center,
Plant and Soil Science Dept., submitted by Mobil Chemical Co.,
Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:093937-K)
000003334 Kapusta, G.; Strieker, (1975) Table: Soybean Preplant Incor-
porated Herbicide Study, 1975. (Unpublished study including
letter dated Sep 12, 1975 from G. Kapusta to Cooperator [Mobil
Chemical Co.], received Dec 12, 1975 under unknown admin, no.;
prepared by'Southern Illinois Univ., Belleville Research Center,
Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:223556-O)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Cications Considered to be Part of the
Data Base Supporting Registrations
Under the Standard
MRID CITATION
000003533 Kapusta, G.; Strieker, C.F. (1973) Late Season Application of Com-
bination Herbicides for Soybean '/feed Control. (Unpublished
study received Feb 9, 1978 under 2224-50; prepared by Southern
Illinois Univ., Plant and Soil Science Dept., submitted by Mobil
Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:232381-E)
000004181 Kapusta, G.; Strieker, C.F. (1975) Milo Herbicidal Weed Control
Study, 1975. (Unpublished study received Mar 9, 1977 under
2224-EX-10; prepared by Southern Illinois Univ., Belleville Re-
search Center, Plant and Soil Science Dept., submitted by Mobil
Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:228701-X)
000003483 Kapusta, G.; Strieker, C.F. (1975) 1975 Progress Report: Combina-
tion Herbicides for Corn vfced Control. (Unpublished study re-
ceived Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by Southern Illi-
nois Univ., Belleville Research Center, Plant and Soil Science
Dept., submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL:228701-D)
000003434 Kapusta, G.; Strieker, C.F. (1976) 1976 Progress Report: Preplant
Incorporated and Preemergence Corn Herbicide Study. (Unpub-
lished study received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by
Southern,Illinois Univ., Belleville Research Center, Plant and
Soil Science Dept., submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial
Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL.-228701-E)
000003550 Kapusta, G.; Strieker, C.F. (1976) 1976 Progress Report: Soybean
Preemergence Herbicide Study. (Unpublished study received Mar
9, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by Southern Illinois Univ.,
Belleville Research Center, Plant and Soil Science Dept., sub-
mitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va.; CDL:228702-L)
000003471 Kushnak, G.; Dubbs, A. (1973) Herbicide Control of Field Cromwell
in Winter Wheat. (Unpublisned study received May 7, 1974 under
4G1505; prepared by [Montana State Univ.], Central Montana Agri-
cultural Research Center, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co.,
Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL-.093987-AQ)
005005105 Leather, G.R.; Foy, C.L. (1976) Differential absorption and
distribution as a basis for the selectivity of bifenox. Pages
123, _In Proceedings of the Northeastern Weed Science Society.
Vol. 30. Painter, Va.: Virginia Truck and Ornamentals Research
Station.
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Considered to be Part of tho
Data Base Supporting Registrations
Under the Standard
cIRID CITATION
005002733 Leather, G.R.; Foy, C.L. (1977) Metabolism of bifenox in soil and
plants. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 7(5):437-442.
005002379 Leather, G.R.; Foy, C.L. (1978) Differential absorption and
distribution as a basis for the selectivity of bifenox. Weed
Science 26(1):76-81.
000003366 LeBlanc, G.A. (1976) Acute Toxicity of Modown Herbicide 4 Flowable
to Daphnia magna . (Unpublished study received Jan 26, 1977
under 2224-53; prepared by EG&G, Bionomics, submitted by Mobil
Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Ricnmond, Va.; CDL:228017-C)
005002741 Lee, A.H.; Lu, P.Y.; Metcalf, R.L.; Hsu, E.L. (1976) The
environmental fate of three dichlorophenyl nitrophenyl ether
herbicides in a rice paddy model ecosystem. Journal of
Environmental Quality 5(4):482-486.
000003547 Leeper, C.D. (1975) Study of the Preplant, Preemergence and Post-
emergence Soybean Herbicides. (Unpublished study received Mar
9, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by Univ. of Illinois, North-
ern Illinois Agronomy Research Center, Dept. of Agronomy, sub-
mitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va.; CDL:223702-G) , .
000003553 Meggitt, W.F. (1975) New Herbicides Applied Preemergence and Post-
emergence for Corn and Soybeans, E. Lansing, 1975. (Unpublished
study received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by
Michigan State Univ., (Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences], sub-
mitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va.; CDL:228702-Q)
000003522 Meinizek, W., Jr. (1972) Determination of MC-4379 by Gas Chromatog-
raphy: Mobil Chemical Method 69-72. Metnod dated Jul 21, 1972.
(Unpublished study received Nov 2, 1973 under 2224-EX-2? submit-
ted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Qiemicals, Richmond, Va.;
CDL:210033-C)
000003523 Mobil Chemical Company (19??) Basic Information—Formulations: [Mo-
down J . (Unpublished study received Nov 2, 1973 under 2224-EX-2;
CDL:210033-D)
000003519 Mobil Chemical Company (19??) Basic Manufacturing Process: [Mo-
down] . (Unpublished study received Nov 2, 1973 under 2224-EX-2;
CDL:210083-B)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Considered to be Part of the
Data Base Supporting Registrations
Under the Standard
MRID CITATION
000003518 Mobil Chemical Company.(19??) Chemistry: [Modown]. (Unpublished
study received Nov 2, 1973 under 2224-EX-2; CDL:210083-A)
000003478 Mobil Chemical Company (19V?) Reasonable Grounds in Support of
This Petition: Analytical Method and Crop Residue Determina-
tions: [Bifenox]. (Unpublished study received May 1, 1974 under
4G1505; CDL-.094586-A)
000003413 Mobil Chemical Company (19??) The Determination of Residues of
Bifenox in Plant Materials: Mobil Chemical Method 70-72. (Un-
published study received Jan 29, 1976 under 2224-EX-14; CDL:
224669-B)
000003428 Mobil Chemical Company (1972) Soil Degradation of Bifenox and
Propachlor Alone or in Combination. (Unpublished study received
Feb 3, 1976 under 6F1738; prepared in cooperation with Rutgers
Univ., Soil Testing Laboratory; CDL:095207-B)
000003461 Mobil Chemical Company (1973) Analysis of Water from Treated Rice
Plots. (Unpublished study received May 7, 1974 under 4G1505;
CDL:093937-X)
0000,03472 Mobil Chemical Company (1973) • Experiment: Wheat Herbicide -•
Screening. (Unpublished study received May 7, 1974 under
4G1505; CDL:093937-AR)
000004175 Mobil Chemical Company (1974) MC-4379 (Bifenox) Residues in Sor-
ghum, Rice, Barley, Oats and Wheat. Summary of studies 093987-E
through 093937-AM and 09398'. -AO through 093987-AY. (Unpublished
study received May 7, 1974 under 4G1505; CDL.-Q93987-A)
000004936 Mobil Chemical Company (1975) Com Results. (Unpublished study
received on unknown date under 5H1738; CDL:23S039-B)
000003434 Mobil Chemical Company (1975) Discussion and Summary: [Rice
Analyses for Bifenox and Propanilj . (Unpublished study received
Feb 3, 1976 under 6F1738; prepared in cooperation with 3io/
dynamics, Inc.; CDL:095209-C)
000003427 Mobil Chornicul Company (1972) Soil Degradation of Bifenox and
AJ.acnior, /'done and in Combination. (Unpublished study received
Fob 3, 1976 uruJor 6F1738; prepared in cooperation with Rutgers
Univ., ;Joii Testing Laboratory; CDL:095207-A)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Considered to be Part of the
Data Base Supporting Registrations
Under the Standard
MRID CITATION
000003435 Mobil Chemical Company (1975) Discussion and Summary: [Small Grain
Analyses for Bifonoxj. (Unpublished study received Feb 3, 1976
under 6F1738; prepared in cooperation with Bio/dynamics, Inc.;
CDL:095209-D)
000003433 Mobil Chemical Company (1975) Discussion and Summary: [Sorghum
Analyses for Bifenox and Propachlorj . (Unpublished study
received Feb 3, 1976 under 6F1738; prepared in cooperation with
Bio/dynamics, Inc.; CDL:095209-B)
000003503 Mobil Chemical Company (1975) Mobil Chemical Modown Herbicide Per-
formance Report. (Unpublished study received Jun 18, 1975 under
2224-EX-4; CDL:210039-A)
000003425 Mobil Chemical Company (1975) Rice. (Unpublished study received
Jun 3, 1976 under 2224-EX-4; CDL:226095-B)
000004938 Mobil Chemical Company (1975) Rice Results. (Unpublished study
received on unknown date under 5H1738; CDL:238040-A)
000004989 Mobil Chemical Company (1975) Small Grains. (Unpublished study re-
ceived on unknown date under 5H1738; CDL:238040-B)
000003544 Mobil Chemical Company (1976) Mobil Chemical Modown Herbicide
Performance Report. (Unpublished study received Dec 30, 1976
aider 2224-EX-10; CDL:096899-B)
000003521 Mobil Chemical Company (1976) Modown Herbicide 4 Flowable Residue
Data. (Unpublished study received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-10;
prepared in cooperation with Bio/dynamics, Inc.; CDL:
228700-A)
000003536 Mobil Chemical Company (1976) Modown 4 Flowable: Rice Residue Data.
(Unpublished study received Jan 26, 1977 under 2224-53; prepared
in cooperation with Univ. of Southwestern Louisiana and Louisi-
ana State Univ. [.and Agricultural rind Mechanical College]; CDL:.
228019-A)
000003358 Mobil Chemical Company (1976) Soil Degradation of Bifenox and
Propanil Alone or in Combination. (Unpublished study received
Jan 26, 1977 under 2224-53; prepared in cooperation with Bio/
dynamics Laboratories; CDL:228015-A)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Considered to be Part of the
Data Base Supporting Registrations
Under the Standard
MRID CITATION
000003432 Mobil Chemical Company (1976) Stability of Bifenox Residues in Fro-
zen Com Samples: Procedure and Results. (Unpublished study re-
ceived Feb 3, 1976 under 6F1738; CDL:095208-A)
000004192 Mobil Chemical Company (1977) Weed Control in Tobacco. (Unpub-
lished study received Feb 9, 1978 under 2224-50; prepared by
Rim Experiment Station, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Indus-
trial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:2328SO-D)
000004172 Mobil Chemical Company (1974) Post Emergence Foliar Application
Study: Bifenox-14C Applied on Rice. (Unpublished study received
Feb 3, 1976 under 6F1738; prepared in cooperation with Rutgers
Univ., Soil Testing Laboratory; CDL:095207-F)
000004173 Mobil Chemical Company (1974) Post Emergence Foliar Application
Study: Bifenox-14C Applied on Wheat. (Unpublished study re-
ceived Feb 3, 1976 under 6F1738; prepared in cooperation with
Rutgers Univ., Soil Testing Laboratory; CDL:095207-G)
000003431 Mobil Chemical Company (1975V) Radioactive Uptake Study of 14C-
Bifenox in Plants: Rotational Crops Grown in 14C-Bifenox Aged
Soil. . (Unpublished study, received Feb 3, 1976 under 6F1738;
CDL;095207-E)
0050U5107 Ohyama, H.; Kuwatsuka, S. (1975) Fate of bifenox (MC-4379) in rice
plant and soil environment. Pages 227-230, _In Proceedings of
the Fifth Asian-Pacific Wsed Science Society Conference.
000003463 Palmer, R.D.; Helpert, C.W. (1973) Rice vfecd Control in the Western
Belt of Texas. (Unpublished study received May 7, 1974 under
4G1505; prepared by Texas [A & M Univ.J, Agricultural Experiment
Station and Agricultural Extension Service, submitted by Mobil
Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:
093987-AG)
000003571 Rogers, R.L.; Crawford, S.H.; Bannon, J.B.; Killmer, J.L. (1974)
Uniform Preemergence Surface Applied Herbicide Tests. (Unpub-
lished study received May. 14, 1976 under 2224-50; prepared by
Louisiana State Univ. (and Agricultural and Mechanical College],
Agricultural Experiment Station, submitted by Mobil Chemical
Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:224427-K)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Considered to be Part of the
Data Base Supporting Registrations
Under the Standard
MRID CITATION
000003453 Russ, O.G. (1973) Report of 1973 Herbicide Data. (pp. 30-31,36-37,
40-45 only; Contribution no. 1412; unpublished study received
May 7, 1974 under 4G1505; prepared by Kansas State Univ., Dept.
of Agronomy, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemi-
cals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:093937-N)
000003551 Russ, O.G. (1975) Weed Control Research Plot Data. (Unpublished
study received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by Kansas
State Univ., Agronomy Dept., submitted by Mobil Chemical Co.,
Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:228702-N)
000003404 Rutgers University (1973) Soybeans—1973: Preemergence—I: MC-4379,
Alone and in Combinations. (Unpublisned study received Oct 8,
1976 under 2224-50; submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial
Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:226291-L)
000003432 Smith, W.R. (1975) Corn Test. (Unpublished study received Mar 9,
1977 under 2224-EX-10; submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Indus-
trial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:228701-B)
000003410 South, D.; Crowley, R.H.; Gjerstad, D.H. (1976) Recent herbicide
weed control results in pine seedbeds. Proceedings of the
Southern .Weed Science Society 29(?):300-308. (Also In_ unpub-
lished submission received Oct 3, 1976 under 2224-50; submitted
by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:
226306-A)
000004194 Thompson, L., Jr.; Slack, C.H.; Rieck, C.E.; Horron, J.W. (1972)
Results of Herbicide Evaluation Trials, 1972. (Unpublished
study received Feb 9, 1978 under 2224-50; prepared by Univ. of
Kentucky, Dept. of Agronomy, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co.,
Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:232881-1)
000003364 Viator, D.; Doselle, L. (1976) Control of Alligatorweed in Rice.
(Unpublished study received Jan 26, 1977 under 2224-53; prepared
by Univ. of Southwestern Louisiana, submitted by Mobil Chemical
Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:228016-M)
000003379 Viator, D.P. (1975) [Herbicide Control of vfeeds in RiceJ.
(Unpublished study received Dec 12, 1975 under unknown admin.
no.; prepared by Univ. of Southwestern Louisiana, Dept. of
Plant Industry and General Agriculture, submitted by Mobil Chem-
ical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:223556-H)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Considered to be Part of the
Data Base Supporting Registrations
Under the Standard
MRID
OU0003387
000004186
000004183
000004135
000003527
CITATION
Walker, J.D.; Triplett, G.B. (1975) Preemergence Weed Control in
Conventional Soybeans: Project No. Hatch 306. (Unpublished
study received Dec 12, 1975 under unknown admin, no.; prepared
by Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, [Dept. of]
Agronomy, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL:223556-R)
Wiese, A.F. (1975) [Efficacy Data on Sorghum]. (Unpublished
study received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by Texas
Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.;
228701-AI)
CDL:
Wu, C.H.; Hill, L.; Santelmann, P.W. (1975) Weed Control in Grain
Sorghum: Report No. C75-2. (Unpublished study received Mar 9,
1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by Oklahoma State Univ. [of
Agriculture and Applied Science], submitted by Mobil Chemical
Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:228701-AD)
Wu, C.H.; Hill, L.; Santelmann, P.W. (1975) Weed Control in Grain
Sorghum: Report No. C75-2. (Unpublished study received Mar 9,
1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by Oklahoma State Univ. [of
Agriculture and Applied Science], submitted by ffobil Chemical
Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL.-228701-AF)
Yocum, J.O. (1976) 1976 Tobacco Herbicide Trial. (Unpublished
study received Feb 9, 1978 under 2224-50; prepared by Pennsyl-
vania State Univ., Agriculture |sic«| Experiment Station, submit-
ted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.;
CDL:232880-B)
-------
Additional citations used to support this registration are
listed belowed that were manually assigned temporary MRID
numbers.
MRID
00130001
00130002
00130003
00130004
00130005
00130006
00130007
00130008
Citation
Mobil Chemical Company (19??). Efficiency of
Method 70-72 for Extraction of Residues from
Watery and Dry Substrates, Section D1-D4
Supplement under Pesticide Petition 1362.
Mobil Chemical Company (19??). Specificity of
Mobil Chemical Method 70-72 for Methyl 5-(2',4'-
Dichlorophenoxy)-2-Notrobenzoate [MC-4378,
Modown] in the Presence of 2,4-Dichlorophenyl
4'-Nitro-phenyl Ether (MC-1002, TOK) under
Pesticide Petition 1362.
Mobil Chemical Company (19??). MC-4379 Residues
in Soybeans/ Corn, Sorghum and Rice; Section
D1-D4 under Pesticide Petition 1362.
Mobil Chemical Company (19??). Metabolism and
Fate of MC-4379 in Plants and Soil - Soil
Degradation and Plant Metabolism Studies;
Section D-5 under Pesticide Petition 1362.
Mobil Chemical Company (19??). Metabolism
and Fate of MC-4379 in Plants and Soil: Plant
Metabolism Studies; Section D-5 Supplement under
Pesticide Petition 1362.
Mobil Chemical Company (1974). MC-4379 (Bifenox)
Residues in Soybean and Corn Alachlor;
Section D1-D2 Supplement under Pesticide
Petition 1493.
Mobil Chemical Company (19??). Metabolism and
Fate of MC-4379 (Bifenox) in Plants. Section
D-5 Supplement under Pesticide Petition 1493.
Mobil Chemical Company (19??). Radioactive Uptake
in Plant Rotational Crops Grown in 14 MC-4379
(Bifenox) Aged Soil; under Pesticide Petition
1493.
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPliY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
000004187 Abemathy, J.R. (1975) Sorghum Screening Trial- -Glover: [Report]
No. 116E--75. (Unpublished study received Mar 9, 1977 under
2224-EX-10; prepared by Texas A & M Univ., Agricultural Experi-
ment Station, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemi-
cals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:223701-AJ)
005005109 Adams, D.R.; Cihacek, D.J.; Smith, W.T.; Vannoy, R.K.; Dregcr,
R.H. (1976) Bifcnox--results of the 1975 experimental permit on
small grains and sorghum. Pages 75-76, In Proceedings of che
North General Weed Control Conference. Vol. 30. Lincoln,
Nebr.: North Central iveed Control Conference.
OOOU1806B Addink, 3.; Keaton, J.A.; Rogers, W.E.; et al. (1975) Surflan plus
Lorox plus Paraquat and Surflan plus Metribuzin plus Paraquat
Tank-Mix Combinations Surface Applied Postplant for Weed Control
in Soybeans under No-Till Conditions. (Unpublished study in-
cluding addendum; experiment nos. SA4-24, SA4-25, SA4-27...;
letter dated Mar 6, 1974 from J.A. Keaton to J.L. Barrentine,
received May 1, 1975 under 1471-96; prepared in cooperation with
Univ. of Kentucky, Dept. of Agronomy, North Carolina State
Univ., Crop Science Dept. and Clemson Univ., Ediston Experiment
Station, submitted by Elanco Products Co. , Div". of Eli Lilly and
Co., Indianapolis, Ind.; CDL:009797-A)
000003435 Agri-Research Associate [sic], Incorporated (1975) [Efficacy
Data on Corn and Soybeans]. (Unpublished study received Mar 9,
1977 under 2224-EX-10; submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Indus-
trial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:228701-F)
000003488 Agri-Research [Associates], Incorporated (1975) [Efficacy
Data on Com and Soybeans] . (Unpublished study received Mar 9,
1977 under 2224-EX-10; submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Indus-
trial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:228701-I)
000003567 Agri-Research Associates, Incorporated (1973) Adrian, Illinois
Plots: [Efficacy Data]. (Unpublished study received May 14,
1976 under 2224-50; submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial
Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:224427-E)
000003569 Agri-Research Associates, Incorporated (1973) Burlington, Iowa
Plots: [Efficacy Data]. (Unpublished study received May 14,
1976 under 2224-50; submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial
Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:224427-G)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
000003492 Agri-Research Associates, [Incorporatedj (1975) [Efficacy
Data on Corn and Soybeans.] (Unpublished study received Mar 9,
1977 under 2224-EX-10; submitted by Mobil Ghenical Co., Indus-
trial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:228701-Q)
005009229 Agronomy and Rice Production Training and Research Departments
(1976) ifeed control in rice: transplanted rice. Pages
224-226, In IRRI Annual Report for 1974. Los Banos, Laguna,
Philippines: International Rico Research Institute.
005007916 Ahrens, J.F.; Cubanski, M. (1977) Herbicides for hemlock seedbeds.
Pages 315-319, In Proceedings of the Northeastern r/feed Science
Society. Vol. 31. Painter, Va.: Virginia Truck and
Ornamentals Research Station.
005004663 Akins, M.B.; J-offery, L.S.; Overton, J.R.; Morgan, T.H., Jr.
(1976) Soybean response to preemergonce herbicides. Pages
50, In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Southern
vfeed Science Society. Athens, Ga.: Southern '/feed Science
Society.
000017024 Alley, H.; et al. (1973) Weed control in corn. Research in :,ifeed
Science 119(Jan):26-23,31. (Test no. 11553a; also In unpub-
lished submission received Nov 20, 1973 under 100-533; submitted
by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:235353-G)
000017439 Alley, H.; Humburg, (1976) Surface Applied Preomerg'jnce-Postemer-
gence Treatments under Sprinkler Irrigation, Torrington; Test
No. 11255. (Unpublished study received Nov 10, 1977 under 100-
EX-59; prepared by Univ. of VJyoming, submitted by Ciba-Geigy
Corp., Greensboro, tl.C.; CDL:232203-B)
005006631 Alley, H.P.; Humburg, N.E. (1978) Annual weed control in wheat and
barley. Pages 14-22, In Research in tJeed Science, 1977.
Laramic, Wyo.: Doming Agricultural Experiment Station.
(Wyoming Agricultural Experiment Station research journal no.
119)
000017243 Andersen, R.N.; Ziebart, D.J. (1975) [Evaluations of Herbicides in
a Soybean Weed Nursury, 1975]: Test No. 10498. (Unpublished
study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-583; prepared by Univ. of
Minnesota, Dept. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, submitted by
Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, M.C.; CDL:0957769-AP)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
000016142 Andersen, R.N.; Ziebart, D.J. (1975) Evaluations of Herbicides in a
Soybean Weed Nursery, 1975: Tost No. 10498. (Unpublished study
received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-533; prepared by Univ. of Min-
nesota, Dept. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, submitted by Ciba-
Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:095762-R)
000004167 Anderson, R.N.; Ziebart, D.J. (1973) Evaluations of Herbicides in a
Soybean vfeed Nursery. (Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Sta-
tion, Scientific journal series, paper no. 8457; unpublished
study received Oct 8, 1976 under 2224-50; prepared by U.S. Agri-
cultural Research Service, North Central Region in cooperation
with Univ. of Minnesota, Dept. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics,
submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va.; CDL:226291-1)
005003765 Anon. (1973) Dwarf beans: weed control. Pages 53-53, In Pea
Growing Research Organisation Annual Report 1972. Thornhaugh,
Peterborough, England: Pea Growing Research Organisation.
005007913 Anon. (1973) Legumes in general: tolerance to herbicides. Pages
73-75, In Pea Growing Research Organisation Annual Report 1972. .
Thornhaugh, Peterborougn, England: P^a Growing Research
Organisation.
t, i > • •
005008015 Anon. (1973) Peas: weed control. Pages 21-30, In Pea Growing
Research Organisation Annual Report 1972. Thornhaugh,
Peterborough, England: Pea Growing Research Organisation.
005003660 Anon. (1974) New herbicides. Soybean Digest 34(5):4-5.
005016731 Anon. (1975) Stale seedbed control of red rice. Pages
101-106, In Louisiana State University Agricultural Experiment
Station, 66th Annual Report. Edited by J.B. Baker. Crowley,
La.: Rico Experiment Station.
OOOOU3477 Arnold, (1973) Experiment: Small Grain Herbicide Screening."
(Unpublished study received May 7, 1974 'under 4G1505; submitted
by Mobil Chemical Co*, Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.;
CDL:093987-AW)
-------
. OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
tIRID CITATION
000003453 Arnold, (1973) Experiment: Sorghum Herbicide Screening.
(Unpublished study received May 7, 1974 under 4G1505; prepared
by South Dakota [State Univ., Dept. of Plant Sciencej , submitted
by Mobil Giemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.;
CDL:093987-U)
000003500 Arnold, G. (1975) Effect of Herbicides on Sorghum—RecJfield. (Un-
published study received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared
by South Dakota State Univ., Dept. of Plant Science, submitted
by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:
228701-AH)
000003476 Arnold, W.E.; O'Neal, W.B. (1972) Wild Buckwheat Control in Winter
Wheat. (Unpublished study received May 7, 1974 under 4G1505;
prepared by South Dakota State Univ., I .ant Science Dept., sub-
mitted by Mobil Chenical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va.; CDL:093937-AV)
000017710 Ashley, R.A. (1974) Preemergence Herbicides on Sweet Com. (Unpub-
lished study received May 11, 1978 under 100-583; submitted by
Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:233950-AJ)
000015439 Ashley, R.A. (1974) 1974 Sunroary of Weed Science Research in Horti-
cultural Crops. By Univ. of Connecticut, Storrs Agricultural.
Experiment Station. Storrs, Conn.: UC. (Plant science working
paper; pp. 12,20-23 only; test no. 10440; also In unpublished
submission received Feb 18, 1977 under 100-583; submitted by
Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:228115-T)
005005267 Baird, D.D.; Brown, R.H.; Phatak, S.C. (1974) Influence of
preemergence herbicides, nitrogen, sod density, and mowing on
postemergence activity of glyphosate for quackgrass control.
Pages 76-86, In Proceedings of the Northeastern \fetxj Science
Society. Vol. 28. Painter, Va.: i-fortheastern Weed Science
Society.
000004162 Baker, J.B. (1977) Rice Weed Control Studies: A Preliminary
Report. (Unpublished study received Apr 11, 1973 under 2224-EX-
4; prepared by [Louisiana State Univ. and Agricultural and
Mechanical College, Agricultural and Experiment Station, Dept.
of Plant Pathology], submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial
Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL.-233847-B)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID
CITATION
000016207 Bauman, T.T.; Williams, J.L., Jr.; Ross, M.A.; et al. (1975) Purdue
ifeed Science Agronomic Crops Investigations: Test No. 10557.
(pp. 4-5,13-14,17-18 only; unpublished study received Jan 19,
1977 under 100-533; prepared by Purdue Univ., Botany & Plant
• Pathology Dept., submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro,
N.C.; CDL:095759-N)
000016202 Bauman, T.T.; Williams, J.L., Jr.; Ross, M.A.; et al. (1975) Purdue
tfced Science Agronomic Crops Investigations: Test No. 10557.
(pp. 4-5,44-49 only; unpublished study received Jan 19, 1977 un-
der 100-533; prepared by Purdue Univ., Botany & Plant Pathology
Dept., submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:
095759-G)
000013387 Bauman, T.T.; Williams, J.L. , Jr.; Ross, M.A.; et al. (1975) Stand-
ard 1; Soybeans 1975: Tesc No. 10557. (Unpublished study re-
ceived 3ep 13, 1977 under 100-523; prepared by Purdue Univ.,
Botany and Plant Pathology Dept., submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp.,
Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:231563-D)
000013394 Bauman, T.T.; WilliaTE, J.L. , Jr.; Ross, M.A.; ct al. (1975) Stand-
ard 1; Soybeans 1975: Test No. 10557. (Unpublished study re-
ceived Sep 13, 1977 under 100-523; prepared by Purdue Univ.,
Botany & Plant Pathology Dept., submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., .
Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:231563-L)
000014360 Bauman, T.T.; Williams, J.L. , Jr.; Wiley, G.L.; ct al. (1973) Uni-
form Soybeans, 1978. (Unpublished study received Apr 30, 1979
under 2224 -EX-5; prepared by Purdue Univ. , submitted by Mobil
Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL.-233281-O)
000016341 Bayer, G. (1974) [Development of Corn and Weeds, Soil Conditions
and Weather at Time of Treating] : Test No. 10167. (Unpublished
study received Feb 18, 1977 under 100-583; submitted by Ciba-
Gcigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:228107-AI)
000015441 Bayer, G.H. (1975) Conventional Com Herbicide Test: 'lest
No. 10512. (Unpublished study received Feb 18, 1977 under 100-
583; submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:
228115-W)
000003554 Bayer, G.H. (1975) Three Bean Herbicide Test: Fabius, New York:
1975. (Unpublished study received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-10;
prepared by 2gway, Inc., submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Indus-
trial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL.-223702-T)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID
000016209
000013395
005010474
000003463
000004179
000016943
000004164
Bayer, G.H. (1975) Three Bean Herbicide Test: Test No. 10513. (Un-
published study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-583; submitted
by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL.-095759-P)
Bayer, G.H. (1975) Three Bean Herbicide Test: Tost No. 10513. (Un-
published study received Sep 13, 1977 under 100-523; submitted
by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:231563-M)
Behm, J.A.; Arnold, W.E. (1976) Agronomic effects of bifenox on
spring wheat as affected by growth stage .and variety
Weed Control Conference. Vol. 30. Lincoln, Nebr.: L-forth
Central Weed Control Conference.
Behrens, R.; Elakkad, M. (1973) Heed Control in Oats and Wheat.
(Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, Scientific journal
series, paper no. 3466; unpublished study received May 7, 1974
under 4G1505; prepared by Univ. of Minnesota, Dept. of Agronomy
and Plant Genetics and Agricultural Experiment Station, sub-
mitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va.; CDL:093937-AM)
Behrens, R.; Elakkad, M. (1974) Precmergence Herbicide Applications
for Weed Control in Corn. (Minnesota Agricultural Experiment
Station,.Scientific journal .series, paper no.; unpublished
study received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-iO; prepared by Univ.
of Minnesota, Dept. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, submitted by
Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:
228701-M)
Behrens, R.; Elakkad, M. (1974) Preplanting Herbicide Applications
for /feed Control in Corn: Test No. NCWCC 1974. (Unpublished pa-
per presented at the Thirty-Firsc Annual Nortn Central vfecd Con-
trol Conference; unpublished study received Jan 6, 197S under
100-EX-38; prepared by Univ. of Minnesota, Agricultural Experi-
ment Station, Dept. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, submitted by
Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:223432-J)
Behrens, R.; Elakkad, M. (1975) Preemergence Herbicide: Applications
for vfeed Control in Corn, 1975. (Minnesota Agricultural Experi-
ment Station, Scientific journal series, paper no.; unpub-
lished study received Dec 12, 1975 under unknown admin, no.;
prepared by Univ. of Minnesota, Dept. of Agronomy and Plant
Genetics, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL:223556-C)
-------
OFFICE OF' PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to bo Inapproprate for
Use in D^vojtoping This Standard
MRID CITATION
000005551 Benrens, R.; Elakkad, M.A. (1978) Herbicide Evaluation for Weed
Control in Oats and Wheat, Rosemount, MN-1978. (Unpublished
study received Mar 2, 1979 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by Univ.
of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station, Dept. of Agronomy
and Plant Genetics, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial
Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:237703-E)
000014348 Sehrens, R.; Wiersma, J.; Elakkad, M.A.; et al. (1978) Herbicide
Evaluation in Spring Wheat at Crookston, MN—1973. (Minnesota
Agricultural Experiment Station, Scientific journal series,
Paper no. 10,527; unpublished study received Apr 30, 1979 under
2224-EX-5; prepared by Univ. of tlinnesota. Dipt, of Agronomy &
Plant Genetics, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial
Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:238281-C)
005007917 Bell, V.D.; Oliver, L.R. (1977) Control and competition of
cut-leaved groundcherry in soybeans. Pages
49-49, In Proceedings of the Southern Vfced Science Society.
Vol. 30. Athens, Ga.: Soutnern Weed Science Society.
J05013084 Still, V.D.; Oliver, L.R. (1979) Germination, control, and
competition of cutleaf groundcnerry (Physalis angulata) in
soybeans (Glycine max). v-fecd Science 27(1): 133-138.
005004450 Boidt, P.F.; Putnam, A.R. (1976) Onion and weed response to
several newer herbicides. Pages 107, In Proceedings—North
Central Weed Control Conference. Vol. 31. Lincoln, Nebr.;
North Central r/feed Control Conference.
000003361 Bowman, D.H. (1975) Table: Mobil Herbicide Experiment, Stonevilie,
Mississippi, 1974. (Unpublished study including letter dated
Jan 22, 1975 from D.H. Bowman to P.J. Kruger, received Jan 25,
1977 under 2224-53; prepared by [Mississippi State Univ. of
Applied Arts and Sciences], Delta Branch Experiment Station,
submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va.; CDL:228016-G)
000003391 Bowman, D.I!. (1975) Table: Modown Herbicide Experiment, Stonevilie,
Mississippi, 1975. (Unpublished study received Dec 12, 1975
under unknown admin, no.; prepared by [Mississippi State Univ.
of Applied Arts and Sciences], Delta Branch Experiment Station,
submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va.; CDL:223554-E)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
000014369 Sozarth, J. (1978) Preplanc Incorporated Study. (Unpublished study
received Apr 30, 1979 under 2224-EX-5; submitted by Mobil Chemi-
cal Co., Industrial Gvemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:238281-X)
000014366 Bozarth, J. (1978) Prepiant Incorporation of Modown. (Unpublished
scudy received Apr 30, 1979 under 2224-EX-5; submitted oy Mobil
Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL;233281-U)
000014370 Bozarth, J. (1978) Prepiant Incorporation of Modown (Largo Scale).
(Unpublished study received Apr 30, 1979 under 2224-EX-5; sub-
mitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va.; CDL:238281-Y)
000014368 Bozarth, J. (1978) Prepiant Incorporation of f-todown (Large Scale).
(Unpublished study received Apr 30, 1979 under 2224-EX-5; sub-
micted by Mobil Chanical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va.; CDL:233281-W)
000014367 Bozarth, J. (1978) Prepiant Incorporation of Modown (Large Scale).
(Unpublished study received Apr 30, 1979 under 2224-EX-5; sub-
mitted by itobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va.; CDL:233281-V)
0050009.93 British Crop Protection Co.unc.il .(1974) Pesticide, Manual: Basic
Information on the Giemicals Used as Active Components of
Pesticides. Edited by il. Martin and C.R. Worthing. 4th ed.
London, England: British Crop Protection Council.
000016647 Burnside, O.C. (1974) Abstract for the 1974 North Central vfeed Con-
trol Conference Research Report: Soil Persistence of Soybean
Herbicides during the Growing Season: Test Ho. 10103. {Unpub-
lisned scudy received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-533; prepared by
Univ. of Nebraska, Agricultural Experiment Station, Dept. of
Agronomy, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:
095769-EA)
000018b97 Burnside, O.C. (1974) Abstract for the 1974 :
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
I-IRID CITATION
000017246 Burnside, O.C. (1975) Abstract for the 1975 North Central Wbod Con-
trol Conference Research Report: Control of Weeds in Close-
Drilled Soybeans: Test No. 10467. (Unpublished study received
Jan 19, 1977 under 100-583; prepared by Univ. of Nebraska, Agri-
cultural Experiment Station, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp.,
Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:095769-BD)
000017075 Surnside, O.C. (1977) Abstract for the 1977 North Central Weed Con-
trol Conference Research Report: Selective Control of vfeods in
Com: Test No. 11488. (Unpublished study received Oct 20, 1978
under 100-533; prepared by Univ. of Nebraska, Agricultural Ex-
periment Station, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro,
N.C.; CDL:235354-BK)
005013033 Burnside, O.C.; Schultz, M.E. (1978) Soil persistence of
herbicides for corn, sorghum, and soybeans during the year of
application. Weed Science 26(2):108-115.
005013384 Clay, D.V.; Rutherford, S.J.; Wiseman, J.S. (1975) New herbicides
for strawberries: crop tolerance and weed control performance.
Pages 599-706, In Proceedings of the 12th British c/fced Control
Conference; 1974. London, England: British Crop Protection
Council.
00001G170 Coan, R.M. (1976) To Obtain Data to Register Dual + Sencor and Dual
+ Lorox for Weed Control in Soybeans: Test No. MW OH 210 76.
(Unpublished study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-533; submit-
ted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, M.C.; CDL:095765-N)
000005390 Coble, H.D. (1973) [Weed Control, Crop Safety,' and Yield Figures on
the Modown Tests]. (Unpublished study including letter dated
Dec 1, 1973 from H.D. Coble to Harvey Dail, received Fob 27,
1979 under 2224-EX-17; prepared by North Carolina State Univ.,
Dept. of Crop Science, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Indus-
trial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:237709-E)
000003556 Cornell University (19??) Regional Research Work with Com and
Soybeans. (Unpublished study received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-
EX-10; submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL:228702-V)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
0000053^1 Crane, L.E.; Schoppe, K. (1973) Research Report of Cooperative Her-
bicides Experiment with Mobil Chemical Company. (Unpublished
study including letter dated Jan 25, 1979 from L.E. Crane to
William C. Odle, received Mar 2, 1979 under 2224-EX-10; prepared
by Chocolate Bayou Co., submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Indus-
trial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:237708-D)
000003395 Crop Chemical Testing Service (1973) Modown and Modown-Treflan
Overlaid Combinations. (Unpublished study received Oct 3, 1976
under 2224-50; submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chem-
icals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:226291-B)
000003396 Crop Chemical Testing Service (1973) tlodown and Modown/Lasso Tank
Mix Combinations. (Unpublished study received Oct 8, 1976 under
2224-50; submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL:226291-C)
000003528 Currin, R.E.; Pitnor, J.B.; Bcnton, D.A.; Stephens, R.L.; Ford,
Z.T. (1977) Tobacco Herbicide Evaluation—1977. (Unpublished
study received Feb 9, 1978 under 2224-50; prepared by (Clemson
Univ.J, Pee Dee Experiment Station, submitted by Mobil Chemical
Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:232330-C)
005015725 Dallyn, S.L.; Stone, K.W.; Warholic, D.T.; Schippers, A.M. (19771,
Control of prostrate spurge in muck onions. Pages
275-282, In Proceedings of the Northeastern V-Jeed Control
Conference. Vol. 31. Farmingdale, N.Y.: Northeastern Weed
Control Conference. (Department of Vegetable Crops, Cornell
University, paper no. 729)
005019822 Davis, J.H.; Habetz, R. (1975) Preemergence surface applied
herbicides on the Habetz Farm, Crowley, La. (a preliminary
report). Pages 204-205, In Rice Experiment Station, Crowley,
Louisiana, 66th Annual Progress Report, 1974. Crowley, La.:
Rice Experiment Station.
005006609 Dean, J.W.; Caudill, J.B.; Fuselier, G.G.; Clayton, C.A.; Dreger,
R.H. (1976) Bifenox: results of the 1975 experimental permit on
rice. Pages 439-441, In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting
of the Southern Weed Science Society. Athens, Ga.: Southern
Weed Science Society.
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
i-'IRID CITATION
005004449 Dean, J.W.; Dreger, R.H.; Jones, D.F. (1977) The effect of timing
of bifenox applications for tne control of barnyard grass in
rice. Pages 402-403, In Proceedings of the Southern vfeed
Science Society. Vol. 30. Athens, Ga.: Southern tfeed Science
Society.
000014362 Dekker, J.; Meggict, W.; Bond, R. (1978) Herbicide Trials on Vel-
vetleaf in Soybeans. (Unpublished study received Apr 30, 1979
under 2224-EX-5; prepared by Michigan State Univ., Dept. of Crop
& Soil Science, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial
Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:233281-QJ
000003513 Dcsselle, L.J. (1977) Control of Alligatorweed in Rice. (Unpub-
lished study received Dec 5, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by
Univ. of Southwestern Louisiana, [Dept. ofJ Agronomy, submitted
by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.;
CDL:232454-F)
000005335 Desseile, L.J. (1978) Chemical Control of Alligatorweed in Rice.
(Unpublished study including letter dated Oct 11, 1978 from L.J.
Desseile to Gregg Fuslier, received Mar 2, 1979 under 2224-EX-
10; prepared by Univ. of Southwestern Louisiana, Dept. of Plant
Industry and General Agriculture, submitted by Mobil Chemical
Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL.-237703-J)
005017724 Desseile, L.J.; Foret, J.A. (1978) Chemical control of
alligatorwecd (Alternantnera philoxeroidcs (Mart.) Griseb.)
in rice [abstract no. 107]. Pages 50-51, In Abstracts of the
1978 Meeting of the ;\feed Science Society of America.
Champaign, 111.: Weed Science Society of America.
000016369 Dexter, A.G.; Nalewaja, J.D. (1974) Evaluation of Preplant Incor-
porated, Preemorgence, and Postemergence Herbicides on Sugar-
beets and Several Other Species: Test No. 10584. (Unpublished
study received Feb 18, 1977 under 100-583; submitted by Ciba-
Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:228107-BO)
000018393 Doersch, R.E. (1974) Herbicide Performance in Soybeans at Arling-
ton: Test No. 10196. (Unpublished study received Sep 13, 1977
under 100-523; prepared by Univ. of Wisconsin, Dept. of Agrono-
my, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:
231563-K)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inappropratc for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
000017149 Doersch, R.E. (1975) Herbicide Performance in Com at Arlington:
II. Preemergence Treatments. (Unpublished study received May
11, 1978 under 100-583; prepared by Univ. of Wisconsin, Dept. of
Agronomy, submi ;ted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:
233950-U)
000003557 Doersch, R.E. (1975) Herbicide Performance in Soybeans at Arling-
ton: II. Preemergence Treatments. (Unpublished study received
Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by Univ. of Wisconsin,
Dept. of Agronomy, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial
Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:228702-X)
000017152 Doersch, R.E. (1976) Herbicide Performance in Corn at Arlington:
II. Preemergence Treatments. (Unpublished study received May
11, 1978 under 100-583.; prepared by Univ. of Wisconsin, Dept. of
Agronomy, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:
233950-X)
000017154 Doerscn, R.E. (1977) Annual Weed Control in Corn at Arlington.
(Unpublished study received May 11, 1978 under 100-533; prepared
by Univ. of Wisconsin, Dept.. of Agronomy, submitted by Ciba-
Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:233950-Z)
000017.143 .Doerscn, R.E.; Paulson, W.H.; .Harvey, R.G. (1976) Herbicide Per-.. .
formance in Corn at Lancaster. (Unpublished study received May
11, 1978 under 100-533; prepared by Univ. of Wisconsin, Dept. of
Agronomy, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:
233950-K)
000003407 Doersch, R.E.; Rand, R.; Harvey, R.G. (1975) Herbicide Performance
in Soybeans at Spooner. (Unpublished study received Cot 3, 1976
under 2224-50; prepared by [Univ. of Wisconsin] , Dopt. of Agron-
omy, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL:22629l-R)
000017141 Doersch, R.E.; Rand, R.E.; Harvey, R.G. (1976) Herbicide Perform-
ance in Corn at Spooner. (Unputalisned study received May 11,
1978 under 100-583; prepared by Univ. of Wisconsin, Dept. of
Agronomy, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:
233950-G)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to bo Inappropratc for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
000017133 Docrscn, R.E.; Weis, G.; Harvey, R.G. (1976) Herbicide Performance
in Com at Hancock. (Unpublished study received May 11, 1973
under 100-533; prepared by Univ. of Wisconsin, Dspt. of Agron-
omy, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:
233950-C)
005011385 Dreger, R.H. (1977) New herbicides. Weeds Today 3(2):18.
000018396 Duke, W.B.; Hann, R.R. (1975) Soybean Herbicides—Seneca County:
Test No. 10556. (Unpublished study received Sep 13, 1977 under
100-523; prepared by Cornell Univ., Dept. of Agronomy, submitted
by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL-.231563-N)
000003330 Eastin, E.F. (1975) Table: Effect of Bifenox and Butachlor -Applied
to Rice on Weed Control 3 Weeks after Emergence at Beaumont,
1975. (Unpublished study received Dec 12, 1975 under unknown
admin, no.; prepared by Texas A & M Univ., Agricultural Experi-
ment Station, Agricultural Research & Extension Center at
Beaumont, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL:223556-J)
005002799 Eastin, E.F. (1976) Separation of bifenox and related compounds by
thin-layer chromatography. Journal of Chromatography
124(2):422-423.
005013925 Eastin, E.F. (1973) Soybean response to selected rice herbicides.
Crop Science 13(6):967-968.
000003459 Eastin, E.F.; Helpert, C.W. (1973) Herbicide Field Evaluations for
Sorghum, 1973: Report No. 2. (Unpublished study received May 7,
1974 under 4G1505; prepared by Texas A Si M Univ., Agricultural
Experiment Station, Dept. of Soil and Crop Sciences, submitted
by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:
0939S7-V)
000016112 Eplee, R.E. (1974) Soybeans—Preliminary Evaluation Control of
Witchweed Host Grasses: Test No. 10074. (Unpublished study
received Jan 19. 1977 under 100-533; prepared by U.S. Dept. of
Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant
Protection and Quarantine Programs, Witciiweed Methods Develop-
ment Laboratory, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro,
N.C.; CDL:095751-T)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to bo Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
iiRID CITATION
000016934 Eplec, R.E.; Langston, M. (1974) Corn—Preliminary Evaluation
Herbicidal Control of Witchwecd and Witchweed Host Grasses: Test
Mb. 10074. (Unpublished study received Jan 6, 1976 under 100-
EX-38; prepared by U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine Pro-
grams, Witchweed Methods Development Laboratory, submitted by
Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, M.C.; CDL:223432-A)
000016099 Eplce, R.E.; Langscon, M. (1975) Small Plot Soybeans: Test
No. 10458. (Unpublished study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-
583; prepared by U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service, Plane Protection .and Quarantine Pro-
grams, Witchweed Methods Development Laboratory, submitted by
Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:095751-F)
000003467 Erickson, L.C. (1973) Preliminary Report: Modown and Other Products
for Control of Veronica hederaefolia Ivyleaf Speedwell.
(Unpubiisned study received May 7, 1974 under 4G1505; prepared
by Univ. of Idaho, Dept. of Plane and Soil Sciences, submitted
by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.;
CDL;093987-AL)
005007048 Fairchild, E.J., ed. (1977) Agricultural Chemicals and Pesticides:
A Subfile of the NIOSH Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical
Substances. Cincinnati, Ohio: National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health. (Pagination includes 46 pages
numbered i-xlvi; available from: OTIS, Springfield, VA: PB-274
748)
000017428 . Ferrant, N. (1976) No-Till Field Com: Test No. 10939a. (Unpub-
lished study received Nov 10, 1977 under lOO-Ex-59; prepared by
Agway, Inc., submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, M.C.;
CDL:232201-D)
000017426 Ferrant, N. (1976) No-Till Field Com: Test No. 109S9c. (Unpub-
lished study received Nov 10, 1977 under 100-Ex-59; prepared by
Agway, Inc., submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.;
CDL:232201-B)
000018729 Ferrant, N. (1976) No-Till Field Com: lest No. 10989c. (Unpub-
lished study received Nov 10, 1977 under 100-EX-59; prepared by
Agway, Inc., submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.;
CDL:232201-N)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRA!1S
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID
CITATION
OUOU10728 Ferrant, N. (1976) No-Till Field Corn: Test No. 10989d. (Unpub-
lished study received Nov 10, 1977 under 10U-EX-59; prepared by
Agway, Inc., submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.;
CDL:232201-K)
000017429 Ferrant, N. (1976) No-Till Field Com: Tost No. 10939e. (Unpub-
lished study received Nov 10, 1977 under 100-EX-59; prepared by
Agway, Inc., submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.;
CDL:232201-E)
000003397 Fink, R.J. (1973) Preemergence Herbicides for Soybeans. (Unpub-
lished study received Oct 8, 1976 under 2224-50; prepared by
western Illinois Univ., Dept. of Agriculture, submitted by Mobil
Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL;226291-D)
005001056 Finke, R.L.; Warner, R.L.; Muzik, T.J. (1977) Effect of herbicides
on in vivo nitrate and nitrite' reduction, l-feed Science
25(1): 18-22.
000003479 Fisons (Canada), Limited (1973) 1973 Modown Development. (Unpub-
lished study received May 7, 1974 under 4G1505; prepared in
cooperation with Canada, Dept. of Agriculture, submitted by
Mobil Giemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:
093937-AX) . ,. . - .
000017056 Fletchall, O.K.; Meyer, M.; Perkins, C.; et al. (1977) The Control
of Meeds: Project 350. (Unpublished study received Oct 20, 1978
under 100-533; prepared by Univ. of Missouri, submitted by Ciba-
Geigy Corp . , Greensboro , N . C . ; CDL : 23 5 3 54 -AB )
000003454 Fletchall, O.K.; Rains, L.J. ; Roskamp, G. (1972) Project 350 — The
Control of Weeds. (Unpublished study received May 7, 1974 under
4G1505; prepared by Univ. of Missouri, Dept. of Agronomy, sub-
mitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Ricomond,
Va.; CDL: 093937-0)
000004195 Fletcher, D. (1972) Report to Mobil Chemical Company: 8-Day Dietary
LC-50? Study with MC-^379 Technical Grade (99?) In Mallard Ducklings
EBT ::o. J1225. (Unpublished study received Sep 1, 1977 under
222-53', prepared by Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories, Inc.,
Va.:
by f
-CVi
(Th^nr? r>a 1 s PI phmnnr)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
000004196 Fletcher, D. (1972) Report to Mobil Chemical Company: 8-Day Dietary
LC-50: Study with MC-4379 Technical Grade (9$%) In Ringneck
Pheasants: IBT No. J1886. (Unpublished study received Sep 1,
1977 under 2224-53; prepared by Industrial Bio-Test Laborato-
ries , Inc., submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemi-
cals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:23l48l-E)
000003507 Fletcher, D. (1976) Report to Mobil Chemical Company: Acute Oral
Toxicity Study with Bifenox Technical in Mallard Ducks: IBT
No. 3580-09570. (Unpublished study received Oct 5, 1976 under
2224-50; prepared by Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories, Inc.,
submitted by .'tobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va.; CDL:228348-A)
000003565 Frans, R. (1972) Table: Soybeans: Secondary Evaluation of Preemer-
gence Herbicides on Crowley Silt Loam, Stuttgart. (Unpublished
study received May 14, 1976 under 2224-50; prepared by Univ. of
Arkansas, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL:224427-B)
000005837 Frans, R.; McClelland, M.; Sharp, T. (1973) Herbicide Field Trials
on Field Crops, 1978. (pp. 2,21-44,68-72 only; unpublished
'study received Feb 27, 1979 under 2224-EX-17; prepared by Univ.
of Arkansas, Agricultural Experiment Station, Dept. of Agronomy,
submitted bv Mobil Chemical Co.,. Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va.; CDL:237709-B)
000013390 Frans, R.E. (1975) Soybeans: Primary Evaluation of Preemergcnce
Herbicides, Fayetteville: Test tto. 10779. (Unpublished study
received Sop 13, 1977 under 100-523; prepared by Univ. of Arkan-
sas, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:
231563-G)
000003446 Frans, R.E.; Blythe, T.O. (1973) Herbicide Field Evaluation Trials
on Field Crops, 1973. (Unpublished study received :iay 7, 1974
under 4G1505; prepared by Univ. of Arkansas, Agricultural
Extension Service, Dept. of Agronomy, submitted by Mobil
Chanical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:093937-G)
005005456 Frans, R.E.; Blythe, T.O. (1974) Herbicide Field Evaluation Trials
on Field Crops, 1973. Fayetteville, Ark.: Agricultural
Experiment Station. (University of Arkansas Agricultural
Experiment Station mimeograph series no. 218)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to bo InappropratG for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
000004200 Frans, R.E.; Blythe, T.O.; Richardson, J.T. (1975) Herbicide Field
Evaluation Trials on Field Crops, 1975. (Unpublished study re-
ceived Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by [Univ. of Ar-
kansas] , Agricultural Experiment Station, Dope, of Agronomy,
submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Ricnmond,
Va.; CDL:22S702-C)
000018235 Frans, R.E.; Currey, W.; Dowler, C.C.; et al. (1972) [Evaluation of
Herbicides on Weed Control in Soybeans]. (Unpublished study in-
cluding test nos. 72-3 and 72-5, received Jul 16, 1973 under
352-270; submitted by E.I. du Pont de Ncmours & Co., Wilmington,
Del.; CDL:002892-B)
000016124 Frans, R.E.; et al. (1975) Soybeans: Primary Evaluation of Pre-
a-nergence Herbicides, Fayetteville—Early Rating: Test
I-to. 10779. (Unpublished study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-
583; prepared by Univ. of Arkansas, submitted by Ciba-Geigy
Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:095751-AG)
005013006 Frans, R.E.; Richardson, J.T.; Gordon, E.G. (1977) Herbicide Field
Evaluation Trials on Field Crops, 1976. Fayetteville, Ark.:
University of Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station.
(University of Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station
mimeograph series no. 249) . ,. , .
Frans, R.E.; Staton, H.C.; Blythe, T.D. (1973) Soybeans. Pages
4-6,18-29, In Herbicide Field Evaluation Trials on Field Crops,
1972. Fayetteville, Ark.: University of Arkansas Agricultural
Experiment Station. (University of Arkansas Agricultural
Experiment Station mimeograph series no. 210)
005007919 Frans, R.E.; Staton, H.C.; Blythe, T.O. (1973) Com and sorghum.
Pages 6-7,30-31, In Herbicide Field Evaluation Trials on Field
Crops, 1972. Fayetteville, Ark.: University of Arkansas
Agricultural Experiment Station. (University of Arkansas
Agricultural Experiment Station mimeograph series no. 210)
000016134 Gardner, P.P.; Chambliss, C.G.; Cooper, R.L.; et al. (1975) 1975
Progress Report: Soybean Researca Studies: Test No. 10492. (Un-
published study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-583; prepared by
Western Illinois Univ., Dept. of Agriculture in cooperation with
Univ. of Illinois, Dept. of Agronomy, submitted by Ciba-Geigy
Corp., Greensboro, M.C.; CDL:095762-D)
005013897
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
i-lRID CITATION
005014304 Gjcr, R.D. (iy78) Predicting the Anaerobic Degradation of Organic
Chemical Pollutants in Waste Water Treatment Planes from their
Electrochemical Reduction Behavior. Washington, D.C.: U.S.
Department of the Interior, Office of Water Research and
Technology. (Montana University Joint Water Resources Research
Center, Bozeman, research report no. 95; available from;: OTIS,
Springfield, VA; PB-289 224)
005020066 Geer, R.D. (1978) Predicting the Anaerobic Degradation of Organic
Chemical Pollutants in waste Water Treatment Plants from Their
Electrochemical Reduction Behavior. Bozeman, Mont.: Montana
State University Joint Water Resources Research Center.
(MUJWRRC report no. 95; available from: NTIS, Springfield, VA;
PB-239 224)
005020073 Gill, H.S.; Walia, U.S.; Brar, L.S. (1979) Chemical weed control
in wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) with particular reference
to Pnalaris minor Retz. and wild oats ( Avona ludoviciana Dur.).
Pesticides 13(12):15-20.
OUU003411 Gjerstad, D.H.; South, D.B. (1975) Supporting Data for Application
for Registration of: Mex-320, Devrinol, Modown, Devrinol SOiflP /
Modown 80WP—Tank Mix, Enide 50WP / Modown 80WP—Tank Mix: For
Weed Control in Pine Seedbeds. (Unpublished study received
Oct 8, 1976 under 2224-50; prepared by Auburn Univ., Dept. of
Forestry in cooperation with U.S. Forest Service, State and
Private Forestry, Southeastern Area, submitted by Mobil Chemical
Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:226305-C)
000004190 Gjerstad, D.H.; South, D.fl. (1976) Supporting Data for Application
for State Registration of: Modown for Weed Control in Pine Seed-
beds. (Unpublished study received Dec 13, 1977 under 2224-50;
prepared by Auburn Univ., Dept. of Forestry in cooperation with
U.S. Forest Service, State and Private Forestry, Southeastern
Area, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL:232503-A)
005013082 Gjerstad, D.H.; South, D.B.; Crowley, R.H. (1979) Effect of
selected herbicides on production of southern pines
( Pinus spp.) in nursery seedbeds. Weed Science
27(2):173-177.
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inappropratc for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
000017523 Gossett, B.J. (1974) Weed Control Research: Teat No. 10216. (Un-
published study received Nov 10, 1977 under 100-EX-59; prepared
by Clemson Univ., Dcpt. of Agronomy and Soils, submitted by
Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:232197-B)
000003J76 Gossett, B.J. (1975) Experiment IF: Evaluation of Soil-Surface
Applied Herbicides for vfeed Control in Com, Pee Dee Experiment
Station, Florence, South Carolina, 1975. (Unpublished study
received Dec 12, 1975 under unknown admin, no.; prepared by
Clemson Univ., Dept. of Agronomy and Soils, submitted by Mobil
Cnemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:223556-E)
000016101 Gossett, B.J. (1975) Weed Control Research: 'lest No. 10781. (pp.
1,26,32,39,41 only; unpublished study received Jan 19, 1977 un-
der 100-583; prepared by Clemson Univ., Dept. of Agronomy and
Soils, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:
095751-H)
000016102 Gossett, 3.J.; Musen, H.L.; Cohoon, D.F. (1974) Soybean Ueed Con-
trol (Experiment 2B, Blackville, S.C.): Test No. 10216. (Unpub-
lished study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-533;' submitted by
Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL-.095751-I)
000004170 Gossett, B.J.; Pitner, J.B.; Purvis, D. (1972) Experiment 7F.. Flor-
ence, 3.C., 1972. (Unpublished study received Get 8, 1976 under
2224-50; prepared by Clauson Univ., [Dept. of Agronomy and
Soils], Pee Dee Experiment Station, submitted by Mobil Chemical
Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL;226291-Q)
000016103 Gossett, B.J.; Pitner, J.B.; Purvis, D. (1974) Soybean I feed Con-
trol (Experiment 3F, Florence, S.C.): Test No. 10216. (Unpub-
lished study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-583; prepared by
Ciemson Univ., Dept. of Agronomy and Soils, submitted by Ciba-
Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:09575i-J)
000016051 Gossett, B.J.; Pitner, J.B.; Purvis, D. (1974) Soybean Weed Control
(Experiment 7F, Florence, S. C.): Test No. 10216. (Unpublished
study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-583; prepared by Clemson
Univ., Dept. of Agronomy and Soils, submitted by Ciba-Geigy
Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:095754-C)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
000016356 Hahn, R.R. (1975) Regional Rescarcn vfork with Corn and Soybeans:
Test No. 10556. (pp. 38,42-44 only; unpublished study received
Feb 18, 1977 under 100-533; prepared by Cornell Univ., submitted
by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:228107-AX)
000016357 Hahn, R.R ;1975) Regional Research Work with Corn and Soybeans:
Test No. 10556. (pp. 38,58-60 only; unpublished study received
Feb 18, 1977 under 100-583; prepared by Cornell Univ., submitted
by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:223107-AY)
000016355 Hahn, R.R. (1975) Regional Research Work with Corn and Soybeans:
Test No. 10556. (pp. 38,55-57 only; unpublished study received
Feb 18, 1977 under 100-583; prepared by Cornell Univ., submitted
by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:228107-AW)
000016353 Hahn, R.R. (1975) Regional Research Work with Corn and Soybeans:
Test No. 10556. (pp 38,45-47 only; unpublished study received
Feb 13, 1977 under 100-583; prepared by Cornell Univ., submitted
by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:228107-AU)
000016351 Hahn, R.R. (1975) Regional Research Work with Corn and Soybeans:
Test No. 10556. (pp. 38-41 only; unpublished study received Feb
18, 1977 under 100-533; prepared by Cornell Univ., submitted by
. . Ciba-Geigy Corp.., Greensboro, N.C., CDL:223107-AS) .., ., .
005004919 Hahn, R.R.; Herendeen, N.R.; Shepard, D.N. (1976) Herbicide
combinations for annual weed control in corn. Pages
64, In Proceedings of the Northeastern Vfeed Science Society.
Vol. 30. Painter, Va.; Virginia Truck and Ornamentals
Research Station.
000003423 Haley, S. (1972) Report to Mobil Chemical Company: Teratogonic
Study with MC-4379 in Albino Rats: IBT No. B2156. (Unpublished
study including report and letter dated Nov 7, 1977 from T.
Ellison to R.M. Scnweikher, received Nbv 10, 1977 under 2224-50;
prepared by Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories, Inc., submitted by
Mobil CheTiical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:
096602-A)
000003465 Hamilton, K.C. (1973) Postemergenco Applications of Herbicides in
Wheat 1972-1973—Mesa. (Unpublished study received May 7, 1974
under 4G1505; prepared by Univ. of Arizona, Dept. of Agronomy
and Plant Genetics, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial
Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:093937-AI)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to bo Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
000003566 Hardcastle, W.S. (1972) Summary Sheet: Test Ref. No. 71-14. (Un-
published study received May 14, 1976 under 2224-50; prepared by
Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Ricnmond, Va.; CDL:
224427-D)
000016119 Harger, T.R.; Rogers, R.L.; Bannon, J.S.; et al. (1975) Soybean
Uniform Preenergence Surface Applied Herbicide Test: Test
No. 10354. (Unpublished study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-
533; prepared by Louisiana State Univ., Agricultural Experiment
Station, Dapt. of Plant Pathology, submitted by Ciba-Gcigy
Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:095751-AA)
000016113 Harger, T.R.; Rogers, R.L.; Bannon, J.S.; et al. (1975) Uniform
Preemergence Surface Applied Herbicide Test: Test No. 10854.
(Unpublished study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-533; prepared
by Louisiana State Univ., Agricultural Experiment Station, Dept.
of Plant Pathology, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro,
N.C.; CDL:095751-Z)
000016123 Harger, T.R.; Rogers, R.L.; Bannon, J.S.; et al. (1975) Uniform
Preemergence Surface Applied Herbicide Test: Test No. 10354.
(Unpublished study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-533; prepared
by Louisiana State Univ., Agricultural Experiment Station, Dept.
.of Plant Pathology, ..submitted by Ciba-Gcigy Corp., Greensboro,.
N.C.; CDL:095751-AM)
000016120 Harger, T.R.; Rogers, R.L.; Bannon, J.S.; et al. (1975) Uniform
Preeuergence Surface Applied Herbicide Test: Test No. 10354.
(Unpublished study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-533; prepared
by Louisiana State Univ., Agricultural Experiment Station, Dept.
of Plant Patnology, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro,
N.C.; CDL:095751-AB)
000016146 Harger, T.R.; Rogers, R.L.; Sannon, J.S.; et al. (1975) Uniform
Preemergence Surface Applied Herbicide Test: Test No. 10354,
(Unpublisned study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-533; prepared
by Louisiana State Univ., Agricultural Experiment Station, sub-
mitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:095752-Y)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
OOOOU3572 Harger, T.R.; Rogers, R.L.; Bannon, J.3.; KilJUner, J.L.; Vidrine,
P.R.; Crawford, S.H.; Marshall, J.G.; Melville, D.R.; Lawrence,
R. (1975) Soybean ifeed Control Research: Progress Reporc—1975.
(Unpublished study received May 14, 1976 under 2224-50; prepared
by Louisiana Stace Univ. [and Agricultural and Mechanical Col-
lege] ,. Agricultural Experiment Station, submitted by Mobil
Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:224427-L)
005005042 Harrison, S.; Oliver, L.R. (1977) Texas gourd, a potentially
serious weed problem to Arkansas producers. Arkansas Farm.
Research 26(3):7.
OU5006913 Harvey, R.G.; Andrew, R.H.; Ruscoe, A.M. (1977) Giant foxtail and
velvetleaf control in sweet corn. Agronomy Journal
69(5):761-764.
000017403 Harvey, R.G.; Baker, C.R. (1974) Annual Weed Control in Corn Study:
Test. No. 10196. (Unpublished study received Fob 9, 1976 under
100-EX-44; prepared by Univ. of Wisconsin, Dept. of Agronomy,
submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, H.C.; CDL:096496-J)
000014359 Hayes, (1978) Herbicide Evaluations for Weed Control in Field
Crops, (pp. 1-3,60 only; unpublished study received Apr 30,
. . . 1979 .under .2224-EX-5; submitted by Mobil..Chemical Co., Indus-
trial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:233231-M)
000003447 Heikes, E. (1972) Sorgnum Yields. (Unpublished study received May
7, 1974 under 4G1505; prepared by Colorado State Univ., Coopera-
tive Extension Service, Arkansas Valley Experiment Station at
Rocky Ford, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemi-
cals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:093987-H)
000003448 Heikes, E. (1973) Evaluation of Herbicides Field Tested. (Unpub-
lished study received May 7, 1974 under 4G1505; prepared by
Colorado State Univ., [Cooperative Extension Service], Arkansas
Valley Research Center at Rocky Ford and Nortnern Colorado
Research Development Center at Greeley, submitted by Mobil Chem-
ical, Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:093937-1)
000016316 Heikes, E. (1974) Corn/Herbicide Experiments: Test No. 10258. (Un-
published study received Fob 18, 1977 under 100-533; submitted
by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, H.C.; CDL:228107-B)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged co be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
;-IRID CITATION
000005871 Heikes, E. (1975) Evaluation of Herbicides Field Tested, 1975.
(pp. 5-6,21-24,26, only; unpublished study received Mar 28,
1979 under CO 79/7; prepared by Colorado State Univ., Coopera-
tive Extension Service, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Indus-
trial Chemical, Richmond, Va.; CDL:237942-A)
U00004163 Heikes, E. (1975) Evaluation of Herbicides for Wood Control in
Com. (Unpublished study including letter dated Oct 22, 1975
from E. Heikes to W.T. Smith, received Dec 12, 1975 under un-
known admin, no.; prepared by Colorado State Univ., Cooperative
Extension Service, [Dopt. of Botany and Plant Pathology], sub-
mitted by Mobil Chemical Co... Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va.; CDL:223556-A)
000016317 Heikes, E. (1975) Evaluation of Herbicides for weed Control in
Corn: Test No. 10568. (Unpublished study received Feb 18, 1977
under 100-583; submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.;
CDL:223107-C)
000014373 Heikes, E. (1976) Sorghum Yields. (Unpublished study including
letter dated Jan 1977 from E. Heikes to R. Dreger, received Jun
5, 1979 under NB 79/8; prepared by Colorado State Univ., Coop-
erative Extension Service, Dept. of Botany and Plant Pathology,
submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals,.. Richmond,
Va.; CDL:238572-E)
000005372 Heikes, E. (1976) Sorghum Yields: Arkansas Valley Research Center—
Rocky Ford, Colorado, 1976. (Unpublished study including letter
dated Jan 1977 from E. Heikes to R. Dreger, received Mar 28,
1979 under CO 79/7; prepared by Colorado State Univ., Coopera-
tive Extension Service, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Indus-
trial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:237942-B)
000017045 Heikes, E. (1977) [Herbicide Application Summary]. (Unpublished
study received Oct 20, 1978 under 100-583; submitted by Ciba-
Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL.-235354-K)
000005873 Heikes, E. (1977) Progress Report, 1977. (Unpublished study re-
ceived Mar 28, 1979 under CO 79/7; prepared in cooperation with
Colorado State Univ., Cooperative Extension Service, submitted
by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:
237942-C)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
;IRID
CITATION
000014346 Lieikes, E. (1978) Com: Evaluations—NCRDC—1978. (Unpublished
study received Apr 30, 1979 under 2224-EX-5; submitted by Mobil
Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:233281-A)
000006056 Heikes, E. (1978) Progress Report, 1978. (Unpublished study re-
ceiviid Mar 28, 1979 under CO 79/7; prepared by Colorado State
Univ., Cooperative Extension Service, submitted by Mobil Chemi-
cal Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:237942-D)
000005879 Heikes, E. (1978) Progress Report, 1978. (Unpublished study re-
ceived Mar 2, 1979 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by Colorado State
Univ., Cooperative Extension Service, submitted by Mobil Chemi-
cal Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:237703-B)
000014347 Heikes, E. (1978) Sorghum. (Unpublished study received Apr 30,
1979 under 2224-EX-5; submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Indus-
trial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:230281-B)
000017329 Heikes, G. (1975) Com Herbicide Experiments: Test No. 10962. (Un-
published study received Feb 18, 1977 'under 100-533; submitted
by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:228112-C)
000017022 Heikes, G. (1976) Center Pivot/Corn/Herbicide Experiments: Test
.No. 10958.. (Unpublished study received Oct 20, 1978 under.100-
533; prepared by Colorado State Univ., Weeds Research Labora-
tory, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:
235353-C)
000017374 Heikes, G. (1976) Corn Herbicide Experiments: Test No. 10955. (Un-
published study received Feb 13, 1977 under 100-583; prepared by
Colorado State Univ., Weeds Research Laboratory, submitted by
Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:228119-1)
000005380 Helper;:, C.iJ.; Eastin, E.F. (1978) Herbicide Field Evaluations for
Rice, 1978. (pp. 1-5,10-24 only; unpublished study received
Mar 2, 1979 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by Texas A & il Univ.,
Agricultural Experiment Station, Agricultural Research and Ex-
tension Center at Beaumont, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co.,
Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:237708-C)
005003010 Helpert, C.W.; Eastin, E.F.; Merkle, M.G. (1974) Herbicide
combinations for weed control in sorghum. Pages
133-143, In Proceedings of the Southern i-Jeed Science Society.
Vol. 27. Athens, Ga.: Southern Weed Science Society.
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged co be Inappropratc for
Use in Developing This Standard
i-lRID CITATION
000016941 Hill, L.; Santelmann, P. (1974) Corn Pro-Plane and Precmergence
Weed Control: Tost No. 10094. (Unpublished study received Jan
6, 1976 under 100-EX-38; prepared by Oklahoma State Univ., sub-
mitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:223432-H)
000003574 Hogue, C.W. (1971) Primary Field Valuation of Preemergence Herbi-
cides in Cotton and Soybeans. (Unpublished study received
May 14, 1976 under 2224-50; prepared by [Mississippi State
Univ. of Applied' Arts and Sciences], Delta Branch Experiment
Station, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL:224427-N)
000004207 Hogue, C.iv. (1972) Primary Field Evaluation of Preemergencc Herbi-
cides in Cotton and Soybeans. (Unpublished study received
May 14, 1976 under 2224-50; prepared by [Mississippi State
Univ. of Applied Arts and Sciences], Delta Brancn Experiment
Station, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL:224427-0)
000016863 Holt, B.E. (1977) Obtain Data for Labeling Dual and Dual Combina-
tions on Sorghum Treated with CGA-43089: Test No. SW OH 304 77.
(Unpublisned study received Nov 8, 1977 under 100-EX-bO; submit-
ted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, U.C.; CDL:096616-H)
. - '!
005017468 Humpnrey, W.A.; Elmore, C.L.; Mock, T.W. (1977) Postemergence
control of common groundsel in container-grown Buxus
microphylla : progress report. Flower and Mursery import
1977:6.
000014350 Humy, C. (1978) Modown 30WP and 4F Pre-Plant Incorporated. (Unpub-
lished study received Apr 30, 1979 under 2224-EX-5; submitted by
Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:
238281-E)
000014351 Humy, C. (1978) Modown SOW7? and 4F Preplant Incorporated. (Unpub-
lished study received Apr 30, 1979 under 2224-EX-5; submitted by
Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:
238281-F)
000014352 Humy, C. (1978) Modown 30WP Combinations. (Unpublisncd study re-
ceived Apr 30, 1979 under 2224-EX-5; submitted by Mobil Chemical
Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:238281-G)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE.PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
000014349 Humy, C. (1978) Modown 30WP Pre-Plant Incorporated. (Unpublisned
study received Apr 30, 1979 under 2224-EX-5; submitted by Mobil
Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:238281-D)
000016150 Hurst, H. (1975) [weed Control Tests on Soybeans]: Test No,, 10SSO.
(Unpuolished study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-533; sub-
mitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:095762-AI)
000016116 Hurst, H. (1975) Standardized Weed Control Tests—Soybeans,, Pre-
emergcnce: Test No. 10855. (Unpublished study received Jan 19,
1977 under 100-533; submitted by Ciba-Goigy Corp., Greensboro,
N.C.; CDL:095751-X)
000016117 Hurst, H. (1975) 1975 Standardized Weed Control Tests: Herbicide
Treatment Information: Tesc No. 10861. (Unpublished study re-
ceived Jan 19, 1977 under 100-583; submitted by Ciba-Geigy
Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL.-095751-Y)
000016135 Hurst, H. (1975) 1975 Standardized Weed Control Tests: Test
No. 10856. (Unpublished study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-
583; submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:
095762-F)
000016136 Hurst, H. (1975) 1975 Standardized Weed Control Tests: Test
No. 10858. (Unpublisned study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-
583; submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, M.C.; CDL:
095762-G)
000017247 Hurst, H. (1976) [Weed Control Tests on Soybeans]: Test No, 10860.
(Unpublished study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-583; submit-
ted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:095769-BE)
000016121 Hurst, H.R. (1975) 1975 Standardized Weed Control Tests: Planting
Information: lest Mo. 10859. (Unpublished study received Jan
19, 1977 under 100-533; submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greens-
boro, N.C.; CDL:095751-AC)
005013045 Ikeuchi, M.; Yasuda, S.; Matsunaka, S. (1970) Mode of action of
diphenylethers and related herbicides on mosquito larvae.
Pages 470-474, In Advances in Pesticide Science: Symposia
Papers Presented at the Fourth International Congress of
Pesticide Chemistry; Jul 24-28, Zurich, Switzerland. Part 3:
Biochemistry of Pests and Mode of Action of Pesticides,
Pesticide Degradation, Pesticide Residues .and Formulation
Chemistry. Vol. 3. Edited by H. Geissbuonlcr. Oxford,
England: Pergamon Press.
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inupproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
005019477 Ikeucni, £•!.; Yasuda, S.; Matsunaka, S. (1979) Mode of action of
diphenylethers and related herbicides on mosquito larvae.
Pages 470-474, In Advances in Pesticide Science: Plenary
Lectures and Symposia Papers Presented at the 4th International
Congress of Pesticide Chemistry; Jul 24-23, 1973, Zurich,
Switzerland. Vol. 3. Edited by H. Geissbuehler. Oxford,
England: Pergamon Press.
'JOOOQ3403 Ilnicki, R. (1973) Soybeans—1973: Preemergence I. (Unpublished
study received Oct 8, 1976 under 2224-50; prepared by Rutgers
Univ., Dcpt. of Farm Crops, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co.,
Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:226291-K)
005004453 Isora, W.H.; ifeng, V.K. (1977) The effects of five herbicides
applied at five different growth stages of Anza wheat. Pages
47-50, In Proceedings of the western Society of Weed Science.
Vol. 30. Boise, Idaho: Western Society of Weed Science.
005005471 Jennings, V.M. (1974) Soybean herbicide evaluations across Iowa in
1974. Pages 79-83, In Proceedings of the North Central Weed
Control Conference. Vol. 29. Lincoln, Nebr.: North Central
weed Control Conference.
QUJ017030 Jennings, V.M.; Barnes, D.; Vogel, A. (1977) Evaluation,of Corn .
Herbicides at the Northwest Iowa Research Center, Sutnerland,
Iowa, 1977: Test No. 11520g. (Unpublished study received Oct
20, 1978 under 100-5
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION .
000016349 Jennings, V.M.; Barnes, D.L.; Ross, K. (1975) Evaluation of Herbi-
cides in Com, Northwest Iowa Experimental Farm, Sutherland,
Iowa, 1975: Test No. 10713. (Unpublished study received Fob 13,
1977 under 100-583; prepared by Iowa State Univ., Agriculture
and Home Economics Experiment Station, Cooperative Extension
Service, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, M.C.; CDL:
228107-AQ)
01)0016139 Jennings, V.M.; Barnes, D.L.; Ross, K. (1975) Evaluation of Herbi-
cides in Soybeans, Nortnwest Iowa Experimental Farm, Sutherland,
Iowa, 1975: Test No. 10623. (Unpublished study received Jan 19,
1977 under 100-533; prepared by Iowa State Univ., Agriculture
and Home Economics Experiment Station, Cooperative Extension
Service, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:
095762-K)
000016345 Jennings, V.M.; Dietz, W.P.; Henderson, J.E. (1975) Evaluation of
Herbicides in Corn, Jackson County, Iowa, 1975: Test No.. 10713.
(Unpublished study received Feb 18, 1977 under 100-583; prepared
by Iowa State Univ. of Science and Technology, Agricultural and
Home Economics Experiment Station, Cooperative Extension Ser-
vice, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:
228107-AM)
000018698 Jennings, V.M.; Murdock, S.J.; Tool, A.W. (1975) Evaluation of Her-
bicides in Soybeans, Clark County, lava, 1975: Test No. 10623.
(Unpublished study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-583; prepared
by Iowa State Univ., Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment
Station, Cooperative Extension Service, submitted by Ciba-Geigy
Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:095759-Z)
000016395 Jennings, V.M.; Peterson, K.; Schnirring, F. (1976) Evaluation of
Herbicides in Corn, Sac County, Iowa, 1976. (Unpublished study
received Jun 20, 1977 under 100-590; prepared by Iowa State
Univ. of Science and Technology, Agriculture and Home Economics
Experiment Station, Cooperative Extension Service, submitted by
Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:230676-I)
000016346 Jennings, V.M.; Peterson, K.R.; Scnnirring, F. (1975) Evaluation of
Herbicides in Corn, Sac County, Iowa, 1975: Test No. 10713.
(Unpublished study received Feb 18, 1977 under 100-583; prepared
by Iowa State Univ., Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment
Station, Cooperative Extension Service, submitted by Ciba-Geigy
Corp., Greensboro, H.C.; CDL:223107-AN)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to bo InappropratG for
Use in Developing This Standard
ilRID CITATION
000016365 Jennings, V.M.; Staniforth, D.W.; Seim, A.L. (1975) Evaluation of
Herbicides in Corn, McNay Memorial Experimental Farm, Lucas
County, Iov;a, 1975: 'Test No. 10713. (Unpublished study received
Feb 13, 1977 under 100-583; prepared by Iowa State Univ., Agri-
culture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Cooperative Ex-
tension Service, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro,
N.C.; CDL:228107-BI)
000017378 Jennings, V.M.; Vincent, G.B.; Goodwin, N.J. (1975) Evaluation of
Herbicides in Corn, Clinton County, Iowa, 1975: Test >to. 10713.
(Unpublished study received Feb 18, 1977 under 100-583; prepared
by Iowa State Univ. of Science and Technology, Agriculture and
Home Economics Experiment Station, Cooperative Extension Ser-
vice, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, M.C.; CDL:
228119-Y)
000003487 Jennings, V.M.; West, J.A.; Johnson, J.C. (1975) Evaluation of
Herbicides in Com, West Pottawattamic County, Iowa, 1975. (Un-
published study received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared
by Iowa State Univ. [of Science and Technology], Agriculture and
Home Economics Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Ser-
vice, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL:228701-H)
005013597 Jensen, K.I.N.; Bandeen, J.D.; Machado, V.S. (1977) Studies on the
differential tolerance of two lamb's-quarters selections to
triazine herbicides. Canadian Journal of Plant Science
57(4):1169-1177.
000005374 Kansas State University, Agronomy Department (1975) Herbicide Per-
formance: Grain Sorghum, 1975. (Unpublished study received Mar
23, 1979 under CO 79/7; submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Indus-
trial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL;237942-E)
000004197 Kapusta, ; Strieker, (1977) Basic Agronomic Data, 1977,
Belleville Research Center. (Unpublished study received
Dec 5, 1977 under 2224-EX-5; prepared by [Southern Illinois
Univ.j, Belleville Research Center, submitted by Mobil Chemical
Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:232453-8)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inappropratc for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
000003541 Kapusta, ; Strieker, (1977) Modown 30WP—Sorghum: Summary
of Data Collected under 2224-SUP-5. (Unpublished study
received Dec 5, 1977 under 2224-EX-5; prepared by Southern
Illinois Univ., Belleville Research Center, submitted by Mobil
Chemical Co., Industrial Chanicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:232453-E)
000014353 Kapusta, G. (1973) [Soybean and Corn Diphenyl ether Analog Stud-
ies] . (Unpublished study including letter dated Jul 11, 1978
from G. Kapusta to Paul Kruger, received Apr 30, 1979 under
2224-EX-5; prepared by Southern Illinois Univ., Belleville Re-
search Center, Dept. of Plant .and Soil Science, submitted by
Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:
233281-H)
000003375 Kapusta, G.; Streiker [sic], C.I. (1975) Combination Herbicides fo
Corn Weed Control, 1975. (Unpublished study received Dec 12,
1975 under unknown admin, no.; prepared by Southern Illinois
Univ., Belleville Research Center, Plant and Soil Science Dept.,
submitted by itobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va.; CDL:223556-B)
000016336 Kapusta, G.; Strieker, (1974) New Herbicides for Corn Meed Con-
trol, 1974: Test No. 10153. (Unpublished study received Feb 18,
1977 under 100-583; submitted by Ciba-Gcigy. Corp., Greensboro,
N.C.; CDL:223107-AD)
000003549 Kapusta, G.; Strieker, (1976) Preplant Incorporated Soybean
Herbicide Study, 1976: Table. (Unpublished study received Mar
9, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by Southern Illinois Univ.,
nutted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va.; CDL:228702-K)
000003398 Kapusta, G.; Strieker, C.F. (1973) Combination Herbicides for Soy-
bean yfced Control. (Unpublished study received Get 3, 1975
under 2224-50; prepared by Southern Illinois Univ., Plant and
Soil Science Dept.., submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial
Cnemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:226291-E)
000016123 Kapusta, G.; Strieker. C.F. (1974) New Herbicides for Soybean Weed
Control, 1974: Test No. 10153. (Unpublished study received Jan
19, 1977 under 100-583; prepared by Soutnern Illinois Univ.,
Plant and Soil Science Dept., submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp.,
Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:095751-AE)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD 3I3LIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
000004245 Kapusta, G.; Strieker, C.F. (1975) 1975 Progress Report: Soybean
Preemergence Herbicide Study. (Unpublished study received Mar
9, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by Southern Illinois Univ.,
Belleville Research Center, Plant and Soil Science Dept., sub-
mitted by Mobil Ghemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va.; CDL.-228702-E)
000004201 Kapusta, G.; Strieker, C.F. (1975) 1975 Progress Report: Soybean
Preplant Incorporated Herbicide Study. (Unpublished study re-
ceived Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by Southern Ill-
inois Univ., Belleville Research Center, Plant .and Soil Science
Dept., submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL.-223702-F)
000017524 Kapusta, G.; Strieker, C.F. (1976) Preplant Incorporated and Pre-
emergence Corn Herbicide Study 1976: Test No. 11037. (Unpub-
lished study received Nov 10, 1977 under 100-EX-59; prepared by
Southern Illinois Univ., Plant and Soil Science Dept., submit-
ted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL.-232197-F)
000016390 Kapusta, G.; Strieker, C.F. (1976) Preplant Incorporated and Pro-
emergence Corn Herbicide Study, 1976. (Unpublished study re-
ceived Jun 20, 1977 under 100-590; prepared by Southern Illinois
Univ., Plant and Soil Science Dept., submitted by Ciba-Geigy
Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:230676-D)
000017052 Kapusta, G.; Strieker, C.F. (1977) Com Preemcrgence Herbicide
Study 1977: Test No. 11448b. (Unpublished study received Oct
20, 1978 under 100-533; prepared by Soutnern Illinois Univ.,
Plant and Soil Science Dept., submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp.,
Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:235354--v^)
000003497 Keliey, K. (1976) Weed Control Research Plot Data. (Unpublished
study received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by Kansas
State Univ., submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemi-
cals, Richmond, Va.; CDL.-228701-Z)
000017683 Kern, C.L. (1978) Evaluate Dual and Tolban in Combination on Soy-
bean: Test No. MW OH 107 77. (Unpublished study received [far 1,
1973 under 100-597; submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro,
N.C.; CDL-.232947-D)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
flRID
CITATION
000017631 Kern, C.L. (1978) Evaluate Dual 6E and 3E PPI and Pre Mono and in
Combination with Sencor, Amiben, Modown: Test No. MW OH 103 77.
(Unpublished study received Mar 1, 1978 under 100-597; submitted
by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:232946-K)
000016107 Kerr, H.D.; Royster, C.M. (1974) [Evaluation of New Herbicides and
Techniques for Controlling Weeds in SoybeansJ: Test No. 10253.
(Unpublished study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-533; prepared
by Univ. of Missouri, Dept. of Agronomy, Delta Center, submitted
by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:095751-O)
000017676* Kincaid, L.R. (1978) To Obtain Data for Labeling Dual 8E, Dual/
Lorox, Dual/Sencor, Duai/Dyanap in Soybeans: Test No. MvV OH 204
77. (Unpublished study received Mar 1, 1973 under 100-597; sub-
mitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:232946-C)
000016151 Knight, C. (1975) vfeed Control Research Plot Data: 'lest No.. 10742.
(Unpublished study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-533; prepared
by Kansas State Univ., Agronomy Dept., submitted by Ciba-Geigy
Corp., Greensboro, U.C.; CDL:095762-AI<)
005005923 Kruger, P.J. (1974) Bifenox broadleaf herbicide—a status report.
Pages 161-162, In Proceedings—Soutncrn vfced Science Society.
Vol. 27. Aphens, Ga.: Southern Vfeed Science Society.
005006393 Kruger, P.J.; Ward, D.; Theissen, R.J.; Downing, C.R.; Kaufman,
H.A. (1974) Bifenox: a selective weed killer. Pages
339-345, In Proceedings of the 12th British vtood Control
Conference. London, England: British Crop Protection Council.
000003370 Kuc, W.J. (1977) Acute Toxicity of Modown 30% W.P. to the Bluegill
Sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus Rafinesque and Rainbow Trout,
Salmo gairdneri Richardson: ES Proj. # 11506-01 B,T. (Unpub-
lished study received Mar 31, 1977 under 2224-50; prepared by
Union Carbide Corp., submitted by .'fobil Chemical Co., Industrial
Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:229601-A)
000004166 Kushnak, G. (1975) Tablo 1: Wild Buckwheat Control in Winter Wheat
with Modown. (Unpublished study received Dec 12, 1975 under un-
known admin, no.; prepared by [Montana State Univ.], Central
Montana Agriculture Research Center, submitted by Mobil Chemical
Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL;223556-I)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inappropratc for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID
000003470
005009715
005005112
000018399
000003534
005005037
005004443
000015936
CITATION
Kusnnak, G.; Dubbs, A. (1973) Herbicide Control, of Annual Broad-
leaved vfeeds in Snail Grains. (Unpublished study received
May 7, 1974 under 4G1505; prepared by [Montana State Univ.],
Central Montana Agricultural Research Center, submitted by
Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:
093987-AP)
Kuwatsuka, S. (1977) [Studies on the fate and behavior of
herbicides in soil and plants.] Nippon Noyaku Gakkaishi.
Kuwatsuka, S.; Niki, Y.; Oyamada, M.; Shimotori, H.; Ohyama, H.
(1976) Fate of diphenyl ether herbicides in soils and plants.
Pages 223-226, In Proceedings of Fifth Asian-Pacific i-Jeed
Science Society Conference; 1975, Tokyo, Japan.
Ladlie, J.S.; Meggitt, W.F.; Bond, R.C. (1974) Preplant Incorporat-
ed: Preplant Incorporated Tank Mixes: Preplant Incorporated plus
Prcemergence Overlays: And Preplant Incorporated plus Postemer-
gence Applications in Soybeans: Test No. 10070. (Unpublished
study received Sop 13, 1977 under 100-523; prepared by Michigan
State Univ., Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences, submitted by Ciba-
Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:231563-Q)
Lanne, R.E. (1973) A 1973 Study of the Secondary Screening of Pre-
plant and Pre-Emergencc Soybean Herbicides. (Unpublished study
received Feb 9, 1973 under 2224-50; prepared by Univ. of Illi-
nois, Northern Illinois Agronomy Research Center, Dept. of
Agronomy, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL:232331-G)
Leather, G.R. (1976) .Absorption, distribution and metabolism of
bifenox. Dissertation Abstracts International 3 36(11):5330.
Leather, G.R.; Foy, C.L. (1976) Uptake and distribution of
14C-bifenox in crop and weed species. Pages
122, In Proceedings of the Northeastern vfccd Science Society.
Vol. 30. Painter, Va.: Northeastern Weed Science Society.
Lee, G.A.; Alley, II.P.; Gale, A.F. (1974) Weed control in corn.
Research in i^eed Science 91(/Mar):35-46. (Test no. 10273; also
In unpublished submission received Jan 6, 1975 under 1QQ-EX-
33; submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:
223432-C)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
000003451 Lipsoy, (1973) Paris,. Missouri Plots: [Grain Sorghum]. (Unpub-
lished study received .'lay 7, 1974 under 4G1505; prepared by
Agri-Research Associates, Inc., submitted by Mobil Chanical Co.,
Industrial Cnemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:093937-L)
000004987 Lipsey, vl. (1975) Evaluation of Modown 4L and Modown 30 WP for Weed
Control in Com and Soybeans. (Unpublished study received on
unknown date under 5H1738; prepared by Agri-Research Associates,
Inc., submitted .by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL:238039-D)
005016199 Lobato dos Santos, C.A.; Leidenuann, L.; Aranha, C. (1976) Estudo
comparativo de diferentes formulacoes do herbicida bifenox na
cultura do arroz. [Comparative study of different formulations
of the herbicide bifenox in rice cultivation.] Lavoura
Arrozeira. [Rice Culture.] 29(295):16-18,20,22-26,28-30,32-34.
005016200 Lobato dos Santos, C.A.; Leidcrmann, L.; Aranha, C. (1977) Estudo
comparativo de diferentes formulacoes do nerbicida Bifenox na
cultura do arroz. [Comparative study of different formulations
of the herbicide Bifenox on rice crops.1 Lavoura Arrozeira.
000017057 i-'laddux, L. (1977) [Weed Control Research Plot Data and Herbicide
Performance of Corn, 1977]: Test No. 11518c. (Unpublished study
received Oct 20, 1978 under 100-533; prepared by Kansas State
Univ., Agronomy Dept., submitted by Ciba-Gcigy Corp., Greens-
boro, N.C.; CDL:235354-AC)
000004165 Mason, J.; Hill, L.; Santelmann, P.W. (19??) Preplant and Preemer-
gence Weed Control in Corn: [Report] No. C75-4. (Unpublished
study received Dec 12, 1975 under unknown admin, no.; prepared
by Oklahoma State Univ., submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Indus-
trial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:223556-D)
000016339 Mason, J.; Hill, L.; Santelmann, P.W. (1975) Proplant .and ?recmer-
gence 'ifced Control in Corn: Test No. 10777. (Unpublished study
received Feb 18, 1977 under 100-533; prepared by Oklahoma-State
Univ., submitted by Ciba-Gcigy Corp., Greensboro, M.C.; CDL:
228107-AG)
005005301 Matthews, R.3.; O'Hcil, J.B.; Kust, C.A. (1
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
000003338 McCall, D.A.; Greer, H.A.L.; Santclmann, P.W. (1975) PPI and Prc-
emergenee vfeed Control Experiments in Soybeans: [Report]
No. C75-16. (Unpublished study received Dec 12, 1975 under
unknown admin, no.; prepared by Oklahoma State Univ., submitted
by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Ricnmond, Va.; CDL:
223556-3)
OU0003568 McGlamery, M.D.; Gardner, F. (1975) Soybean Weed Control at Macomb,
Illinois—1975. (Unpublished study received May 14, 1976 under
2224-50; prepared by Univ. of Illinois, Dspt. of /Vgronomy in
cooperation with Western Illinois Univ., Dept. of Agriculture,
submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va., CDL:224427-F)
000016154 McGlamery, M.D.; Gardner, F. (1975) Soybean Weed Control—Macomb,
Illinois, 1975: Test No. 10492. (Unpublished study received Jan
19, 1977 under 100-533; prepared by ifestern Illinois Univ.,
Dept. of Agriculture in cooperation with Univ. of Illinois,
Dept. of Agronomy, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., 'Greensboro,
N.C.; CDL:095752-AN)
000016337 McGlamery, M.D.; SLifc, F.W. (1974) Corn Herbicide Trials at
Brownstown, Illinois, 1974: Test No. 10063. (Unpublished study
received,.Feb 13, 1977 under 100-533; submitted by Ciba-Geigy
Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:228107-AE)
000016366' McGlamery, M.D.; Slife, F.W. (1974) Preemergence Corn Herbicide
Trials at Urbana, Illinois, 1974: Test No. 10059. (Unpublished
study received Feb 18, 1977 under 100-533; submitted by Ciba-
Geigy Corp., Green ;toro, N.C.; CDL:228107-BJ)
000017390 McGlamery, M.D.; Slife, F.W. (1975) Corn Herbicide Trials--Urbana,
Illinois, 1975: Test No. 10497. (Unpublished study received Feb
L8, 1977 under 100-583; prepared by Univ. of Illinois, Dept. of
Agronomy, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:
223119-AO)
000016912 McGlamery, M.D.; Slife, F.W. (1976) Corn Herbicide Performance at
Urbana, Illinois in 1976: Test No. 11047. (Unpublished study
received Nov 10, 1977 under 100-EX-59; prepared by Univ. of
Illinois, Dept. of Agronomy, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp.,
Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:232199-H)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged co be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
i-iHID
CITATION
000016367 McGlamery, M.D.; Zajicek, F. (1975) Corn Herbicide Trial—Browns-
town, 1975: Test:'No.- 10496. (Unpublished study received Feb 18,
1977 under 100-583; prepared by Univ. of Illinois, Dept.. of
Agronomy, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:
223107-BL)
000017513 McGlamery, M.D.; Zajicek, F. (1976) Com Herbicide Performance at
Brownstown, Illinois in 1976: Test Ho. 11046. (Unpublished
study received Mov 10, 1977 under 10Q-EX-59; prepared by Univ.
of Illinois, Dept. of Agronomy, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp.,
Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:232199-D)
000016205 McKibben, G. (1975) [Soybean Herbicides for Conventional Seedbeds—
1975]: Test No. 10813. (Unpublished study received Jan 19, 1977
under 100-533; submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.;
CDL:095759-L)
000016132 McKibben, G. (1975) Soybean Herbicides for Conventional Seedbeds—
1975: Test No. 10813. (Unpublished study received Jan 19, 1977
under 100-533; submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.;
CDL:095751-AR)
000017053 McKibben, G. (1977) Conventional Com Herbicides—1977: Test
.:•• . ito. 11342. (Unpublished study received Oct 20, 1973 under 100-
533; prepared by Univ. of Illinois, Cooperative Extension Ser-
vice, Dept. of Agronomy, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greens-
boro, N.C.; CDL:235354-AD)
000003489 Meggitt, (1975) Preemergence Meed Control Evaluations in Corn, East
Lansing, Michigan, 1975. (Unpublished study received Mar 9,
1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by Michigan State Univ.,
submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Riciimond,
Va.; CDL:228701-K)
000004173 Meggitt, (1976) Preplant Weed Control Evaluations in Com,
Potterville, Michigan, 1976. (Unpublished study including rain-
fall data, received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by
Michigan State Univ., submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industri-
al Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:228701-L)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to bo Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
i-lRID CITATION
000017070 Meggitt, W. (1976) [Preplant and Pro-emergence Weed Control Evalu-
ations in Corn, Pottervillc, Michigan, 1976]: Test Mo. 10875 A.
(Unpublished study received Oct 20, 1978 under 100-583; prepared
by Michigan State Univ., Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences, sub-
mitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:235354-B3)
000017336 Meggitt, W. (1976) Preplant weed Control Evaluations in Corn, Pot-
terville, Michigan, 1976: Test No. 10375. (Unpublished study
received Fob 18, 1977 under 100-583; prepared by Michigan State
Univ., Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences, submitted by Ciba-Geigy
Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:228119-AJ)
000016329 Meggitt, W.; Bond, R.; Ladlie, J.; et ai. (1974) Preemorgence Ap-
plications for Annual Weed Control in Field Corn, E. Lansing,
Michigan, 1974: Test No. 10070. (Unpublisned study received Feb
18, 1977 under 100-5d3; prepared by Michigan State Univ., Dept.
of Crop and Soil Sciences, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp.,
Greensboro, M.C.; CDL:228107-V)
000016203 Meggitt, W.E. (1976) Preplant, Preplant Followed by Preemergcnce
and Preemergencc Weed Control Evaluations in Soybeans, Hillsdale
County, Michigan, 1976: Test No. 10375. (Unpublished study re-
ceived Jan 19, 1977 under 100-583; prepared by Michigan State
Univ., submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:
095759-0)
000003385 Meggitt, W.F. (1975) Preplant Incorporated, Preemergence & Post-
energence vtecd Control Evaluations in Soybeans, East Lansing,
Michigan, 1975. (Unpublished study received Dec 12, 1975 under
unknown admin, no.; prepared by Michigan State Univ., [Dope, of]
Crop and Soil Sciences, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Indus-
trial Chanicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:223556-P)
000016059 Meggitt, W.F. (1976) Preplant Incorporated Weed Control Evaluations
in Soybeans, Potterville, Michigan, 1976: Test No. 10375. (Un-
published study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-533; prepared by
Michigan State Univ., suonitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro,
N.C.; CDL:095754-N)
000017048 Meggitt, tf.F.; Bond, R.; Stearns, R. (1977) Preplant Incorporated,
Preemergence and Postemergence Weed Control Evaluations in
Com, Michigan, 1977: Test No. 11385b. (Unpublisned study re-
ceived Oct 20, 1^73 under 100-533; prepared by Micnigan State
Univ., Dept. of Crop Si Soil Sciences, submitted by Ciba-Geigy
Corp., Greensboro, W.C.; CDL:23 5 3 5 4-0)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to bo Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
;liUD CITATIObI
000016213 Meggitt, W.F.; Bond, R.; Stearns, R.; et al. (1975) Preemergence &
Postemergence vfeed Control Evaluations in Soybeans, East Lans-
ing, Michigan, 1975: Test No. 10511. (Unpublished study re-
ceived Jan 19, 1977 under 100-533; prepared by Michigan State
Univ., Dept. of Crop & Soil Sciences, submitted by Ciba-Geigy
Corp., Greensboro,.N.C.; CDL:095759-X)
000017375 Meggitt, W.F.; Bond, R.; Stearns, R.; et al. (1975) Preplant Weed
Control Evaluations in Corn, East Lansing, Michigan, 1975: Test
No. 10511. (Unpublished study received Feb 18, 1977 under 100-
583; prepared by Michigan State Univ., Dept. of Crop & Soil
Sciences, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:
228119-N)
000016212 Meggitt, W.F.; Bond, R.; Steams, R.; et al. (1976) Preemergenco
Weed Control Evaluations of Soybeans, Potterville, Michigan,
1976: Test No. 10875. (Unpublished study received Jan 19, 1977
under 100-583; prepared by Michigan State Univ., Dept. of Crop &
Soil Sciences, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.;
CDL:095759-U)
OU0003399 Meyer, L.J.; Season, E.J. (1973) Herbicides: Herbicide Research.
(Unpublished study including letter dated Nov 20, 1973 from L.J.
, . Meyer to Paul J. Kruger, received Get 8, 1976. und^r 2224-50;
prepared by Kansas State Univ., Southeast Kansas Branch Experi-
ment Station, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial
Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:22b291-F)
000003452 Meyer, L.J.; Fuller, W.W.; Boren, F.W.; Season, E.J.; Kilgore,
G.L.; Dayton, A.D.; Mickeil, C.D.; Walter, T.L.; Overley, C.B.
(1973) Plant and Soil Science Research Results, 1973. (South-
east Kansas Branch Experiment Station, Contribution no. 29;
Dept. of Agronomy, no. 1342; unpublished study received May 7,
1974 under 4G1505; prepared by Kansas State Univ., Agricultural
Experiment Station, Dept. of Agronomy, Southeast Kansas Branch
Experiment Station and Dept. of Statistics & Computer Science,
submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va.; CDL:093987-M)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
005004855 Michieka, R.W.; Ilnicki, R.D.; Somody, J. (1976) Weed control in
soybeans with dinitroaniline herbicides followed by
preemergence herbicides. Pages 19-22, _In Proceedings of the
Northeastern Weed Science Society. Vol. 30. Painter, Va.:
Northeastern ifeed Science Society.
000005389 Midwest Research Farms (1978) Modown 30WP and 4F: Soybeans—Amsoy
71. (Unpublished study received Fob 27, 1979 under 2224-EX-17;
submitted by Mobil Giemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va.; CDL:237709-D)
000003511 Miller, ; Lueschen, ; Fond, (1977) Corn Herbicide Performance,
Minnesota, 1977. (Unpublished study received Doc 5, 1977
1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by Univ. of Minnesota,
Agricultural Extension Service, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co.,
Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL;232454-D)
00000419d Miller, ; Lueschen, ; Ford, (1977) Herbicide Performance
on Soybeans, Minnesota, 1977. (Unpublished study received
Dec 5, 1977 under 2224-EX-5; prepared by Univ. of Minnesota,
Agricultural Extension Service, submitted by Mobil Chemical
Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL.-232453-C)
000018714 Miller, G.R..; Ford, H.J. (1975) Herbicide Performance on Corn at
Lamberton, Minnesota in 1975: Test Mo. 10571. (Unpublished
study received Feb 18, 1977 under 100-533; prepared by Univ. of
Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station, Dept. of Agronomy
and Plant Genetics, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro,
N.C.; CDL.-228112-AV)
000016156 Miller, G.R.; Ford, H.J. (1975) Herbicide Performance on Soybeans
at Lamberton, Minnesota in 1975: Test No. 10571. (Unpublished
study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-533; prepared by Univ. of
Minnesota, Dept. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, .submitted by
Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:095762-AS)
OJ0017506 Miller, G.R.; Ford, H.J. (1977) Herbicide Performance on Com at
Lamberton, Minnesota in 1977: Test No. 11555d. (Unpublished
study received Get 20, 1978 under 100-583; prepared by Univ. of
Minnesota, Dspt. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, submitted by
Ciaa-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:235354-3R)
000017J46 Miller, G.R.; Luescnen, W.E. (1975) Herbicide Performance on Com
at Wascca, Minnesota in 1975: Test No. 10571. (Unpublished
study received Feb 18, 1977 under 100-533; prepared by Univ. of
Minnesota, Dept. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, submitted by
Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:228112-AZ)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
000016159 Miller, G.R.; Lueschen, W.E. (1975) Herbicide Performance on Soy-
beans at Waseca, Minnesota in 1975: Test No. 10571. (Unpub-
lished study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-533; prepared by
Univ. of Minnesota, Dept. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, sub-
mitted oy Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:095762-AX)
J00015397 Miller, G.R.; Lueschen, W.E. (1976) Herbicide Performance on Corn
at Wascca, Minnesota, in 1976. (Unpublished study received Jun
20, 1977 under 100-590; prepared by Univ. of Minnesota, Dept. of
Agronomy and Plant Genetics, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp.,
Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:23067S-K)
000017038 Miller, G.R.; Lueschen, W.E. (1977) Herbicide Performance on Corn
at Wascca, Minnesota in 1977: Test No. 11555c. (Unpublished
study received Oct 20, 1978 under 100-583; prepared by Univ. of
Minnesota, Dept. of Agronarty and Plant Genetics, submitted by
Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL-.235353-AD)
000017338 Miller, G.R.; i-farnes, D.D. (1975) Herbicide Performance on Com at
Morris, Minnesota in 1975: Test Mo. 10571. (Unpublished study
received Feb 18, 1977 under 100-583; prepared by Univ. of Minne-
sota, Agricultural Experiment Station, Dept. of Agronomy and
Plant Genetics, submitted by Ciba-Gaigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.;
CDL:228112-AD) ...
000016054 Miller, G.R.; Warncs, D.D. (1975) Herbicide Performance.on Soybeans
at Morris, Minnesota in 1975: Test No. 10571. (Unpublished
study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-583; prepared by Univ. of
Minnesota, Dept. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, submitted by
Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:095754-I)
000015434 Mitchell, W.M.; Uniatowski, R. (1975) weed Control in Com, Soy-
beans and Turf Grass: Test No. 10822. (Unpublisncd study re-
ceived Feb 18, 1977 under 100-583; prepared by Univ. of Dela-
ware, Dept. of Plant Science, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp.,
Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:223115-B)
000003339 Mobil Chemical Company (19??) Chemical and Physical Properties:
^ known admin, no.; CDL:223554-A)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprace for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
000003509 Mobil Chemical Company (19??) Modown 4 Flowable—Corn: Summary of
Data Collected under 2224-EUP-10. Summary of studies 232454-B
through 232454-D. (Unpublished study received Dec 5, 1977 under
2224-EX-10; CDL:232454-A)
000003363 Mobil Chemical Company (19??) Modowti 4 Flowable: Summary of Re-
search Trials: Postemergence. Summary of studies 223016-M
through 223016-N. (Unpublished study received Jan 26, 1977
under 2224-53; CDL:223016-J)
000003360 Mobil Chemical Company (19??) Modown 4 Flowabie: Summary of Re-
search Trials: Preemergence. Summary of studies 223016-C
through 228016--H. (Unpublished study received Jan 26, 1977
under 2224-53; CDL:223016-B)
000003539 Mobil Chemical Company (19??) Modown SOvVP—Corn: Summary of Data
Collected under 2224-EUP-5. Summary of studies 23245J-B through
232453-C. (Unpublished study received Dec 5, 1977 under 2224-
EX-5; CDL:232453-A)
000006057 Mobil Chemical Company (19??) Reasonable Grounds in Support of this
Petition: Analytical Method and Crop Residue Determinations:
6F1738; CDL:097963-A)
00000339D Mobil Chemical Company (19??j Residue Data: [Modov/n]. (Unpublished
study received Dec 12, 1975 under unknown admin, no.; CDL:
223554-C)
000003368 Mobil Chemical Company (19??) Summary of Data: [Modown Herbicide
4 Flowable]. Summary of studies 223013-B through 223018-G.
(Unpublished study received Jan 26, 1977 under 2224-53; CDL:
22301S-A)
000005377 Mobil Chemical Company (1972?) The Fate of MC-4379 Fed to Mammals
Residue Studies with Dogs. Undated method. (Unpublished study
received on unknown date under 3G1362; CDL:097939-A)
000003524 Mobil Chemical Company (1972) Analytical Method for Determination
of Impurities in Technical MC-4379. (Unpublished study received
otov 2, 1973 under 2224-EX-2; CDL:210033-E)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
llRID CITATION
000003464 Mobil Chemical Company (1973) [Barley, Oats and Wheat:
Efficacy of Bifenox]. Summary of studies 093987-AI through
093937-AM and 093937-AO through 093937-AY. (Unpublished study
received May 7, 1974 under 4G1505; CDL:093987-AH)
000003480 Mobil Chemical Company (1973) Brookings Small Grain Herbicide
Screening. (Unpublished study received May 7, 1974 under
4G1505; CDL:093987-AY)
005013523 Mobil Chanical Company (1973) Modown Herbicide. Ricnmond, Va.:
MoDil Chemical Company. (Mobil Chemical technical bulletin no.
3)
000003576 Mooil Chemical Company (1973) Modown 30 Wettable Pov*3cr and Modown
2 Emulsifiable Concentrate: Summary of Efficacy Data (Large
Scale Trials): Supporting Control of Prickly Sida in Soybeans.
(Unpublished study received May 14, 1976 under 2224-50; CDL:
224427-R)
000003450 Mobil Chemical Company (1973) Rice. Summary of studies 093937-X
througn .093987-AG. (Unpublished study received May 7, 1974
under 4G1505; CDL:093937-W)
000003445 Mobil Chemical. Company (1973), Sorghum. Summary of .studies 09J987-F
through 093987-V. (Unpublisned study received May 7, 1974 under
4G1505; CDL:093937-E)
000003532 Mobil Chemical Company (1973) Soybean Weed Control--Mobil Chemical
Company. (Unpublisned study received Feb 9, 1978 under 2224-50;
prepared in cooperation witn [Univ. of Florida], Agricultural
Research Center; CDL:23288i-D)
000003531 Mobil Chemical Company (1973) Summary of Rosearcin Data: Soybeans—
Annual Morning Glory. Summary of studies 232381-D through
232331-L. (Unpublished study received FeS '), 1978 under 2224-
50; CDL:232831-C)
000004171 Mobil Chemical Company (1974) Large Scale Field Tests in Soybeans
and Com with Modown Herbicides. (Unpublished study received
Nov 6, 1974 under 2224-50; CDL-.023027-A)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprato for
Use in Developing This Standard
,-iRID CITATION
000003429 Mobil Chemical Company (1974) Radioactive 14C-Uptake in Flooded
Rice Grown in 14C-Bifenox Soil. (Unpublished study received Feb
3, 1976 under 6F1733; prepared in cooperation with Rutgers
Univ., Soil Testing Laboratory; CDL:095207-C)
000003430 Mobil Chemical Company (1974) Radioactive 14C-Uptake in Small
Grains Grown in 14C-Bifenox Soil. (Unpublished study received
Feb 3, 1976 under 6F173S; prepared in cooperation with Rutgers
Univ., Soil Testing Laboratory; CDL:095207-D)
000003543 Mobil Chemical Company (1975) Bifenox Environmental Chemistry
Review. Includes method MQ1 72-72 dated Sop 26, 1972; undated
method entitled: Photolysis (simulated sunlight) of MC-4379
(Bifenox) in water solution. (Unpublished study including
letter dated Jan 2, 1975 from D.D. Campt to A.J. Huvar, received
Jan 24, 1975 under unknown admin, no.; prepared in cooperation
with Cannon Laboratories, Inc.; CDL:120447-A)
000003421 Mobil Chemical Company (1975) Mobil Chemical Modown Herbicide Per-
formance Report. (Unpublished study received Aug 3, 1975 under
2224-EX-4; CDL:226094-A)
000003374 Mobil Chemical Company (1975) Modown Herbicide Performance
, . . .Report. (Unpublished study received Nov 11,. 1975 under
2224-EX-4; CDL:223553-A)
000003564 Mobil Chemical Company (1975) Modown 30 Wettable Powder and Hodown
2 Emulsifiable Concentrate: Summary of Efficacy Data (Research
Trials): Supporting Control of Prickly Sida in Soybeans. Sum-
mary of studies 224427-B through 224427-Q. (Unpublished study
received May 14, 1976 under 2224-50; CDL:224427-A)
000003412 Mobil Chemical Company (1975) Re- idue Data: [Bifenox| : Study No.
75017. (Unpublished study received Jan 29, 1976 under 2224-EX-
14; CDL:224659-A)
000003426 Mobil Chemical Company (1975) Small Grains. (Unpublished study
received Jun 3, 1976 under 2224-EX-4; CDL:226095-C)
000003424 Mobil Chemical Company (1975) Sorghum. (Unpublished study received
Jun 3, 1976 under 2224-EX-4; CDL:226095-A)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
000003577 Mobil Chemical Company (1975) Summary of and Reference to Modown
30% Wettable Powder and 2EC Data Supporting Control of Prickly
Sida in Soybeans. (Unpublished study received May 14, 1976
under 2224-50; CDL:224427-S)
000003394 Mobil Chemical Company (1975) Summary of Research Trials: Soy-
beans—Modown 30% vfcttable Powder and Modown 2 Emulsifiable
Concentrate. Summary of studies 226291-B througn 226291-S.
(Unpublished study received Oct 8, 1976 under 2224-50; CDL:
226291-A)
000003517 Mobil Chemical Company (1975) Temporary Permit No. 2224-EXP-2G,
Modown Herbicide Vfettable Powder: Temporary Permit No. 2224-EXP-
3G...: Fourth Quarterly Report:. (Unpublished scudy including 17
state summaries of weed control, received Jun 4, 1975 under
2224-EX-2; CDL:210030-A,210079)
000003386 Mobil Cnemical Company (1975) Three Scan Herbicide Test, Fabius,
New York, 1975. (Unpublished study received Dec 12, 1975 under
unknown admin, no.; CDL:223556-Q)
000003359 Mobil Chemical Company (1976?) Modown Herbicide 4 Flowable. Sum-
mary of studies 223016-B through 288016-E, 288016-G through
228016-J, 228016-M through 223016-N and 223016-P. (Unpublished
study received Jan 26, 1977 under 2224-53; CDL:223016-A)
000003504 Mobil Chemical Company (1976) [Modown Herbicide Performance
Report]. (Unpublished study received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-
10; CDL:228701-AO)
000003505 Mobil Chemical Company (1976) [Modown Herbicide Performance
Report]. (Unpublished study received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX--
10; CDL:223701-A?)
000003506 Mobil domical Company (1976) [Modown Herbicide Performance
Report]. (Unpublished study received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-
10; CDL:228701-AQ)
000003502 Mobil Chemical Company (1976) [Modown Herbicide Performance
Report]. (Unpublished study received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX™
10; CDL:223701-AL)
000003503 Mobil Chemical Company (1976) [Modown Herbicide Performance
Report]. (Unpublished study received Mir 9, 1977 under
2224-EX-10; CDL:228701-AN)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
. REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY .
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing Tnis Standard
000004188
00000420 3
000003373
000003372
000003393
000003560
000003559
000003530
000003436
CITATION
Mobil Chatiical Company (1976) (Modown Herbicide Performance
Report]. (Unpublished study received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-
10; CDL:228701-AM)
Mobil Chemical Company (1976) Modown Herbicide Performance
Report. (Unpublished study received Mar 9, .1977 under
2224-EX-10; CDL:228702-AH)
Mobil Chemical Company (1976) Modown Herbicide Performance
Report. (Unpublished study received Jan 17, 1977 under
2224-EX-4; CDL:229150-A)
Mobil Chemical Canpany (1976) Modown Herbicide Performance
Report. (Unpublished scudy received Jan 17, 1977 under
2224-EX-5; CDL:230077-A)
Mobil Chemical Company (1976) f-todown Herbicide 10% Granular: Rice.
(Unpublished study received Jan 10, 1977 under 2224-EX-ll; CDL:
096900-D)
Mobil Chemical Company (1976) Modown 4 Flowable: Summary of Effica-
cy Data on Small Grains. Sutmary of studies 228702-AC through
228702-AH. (Unpublished study received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-
EX-10; ,CPL:2287.02-AA) ,;.
Mobil Chemical Company (1976) Modown 4 Flowable: Summary of Large
Scale Efficacy Data Supporting Control of Jimsonweed. (Unpub-
lished study received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; CDL:
228702-Z)
Mobil Chemical Company (197G) Modown 4 Flowable: Summary of Large
Scale Efficacy Data Supporting Control of Horning Glory. (Un-
published study received Feb 9, 1973 under 2224-50; CDL:
232881-B)
Mobil Chemical Company (1976) Modown 4 Flowable: 2224-EUP-10:
Summary of Shipment .and Use: March through June 5, 1976. (Un-
published study received Jun 29, 1976 under 2224-EX-10; CDL:
096898-A)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
000003501 Mobil Chemical Company (1976) Summary of Large Scale Data Support-
ing Registration of Modown 4 Flowable for Control of Jiinsonweed
on Com and Sorghum. Summary of studies 228701-AL througn
223701-AQ. (Unpublished study received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-
EX-10; CDL:228701-AK)
OOQ003365 Mobil Chemical Company (1976) Summary of Large Scale Efficacy Data
Supporting Control of Alligator Weed in Rice (Postemergence).
(Unpublished study received Jan 26, 1977 under 2224-53; CDL:
223016-P)
OOOOU3362 Mobil Chemical Company (1976) Summary of Large Scale Efficacy Data
Supporting Control of Annual Sedge in Rice (Prcemergence). (Un-
publisned.study received Jan. 26, 1977 under 2224-53; CDL:
223016-1)
000003409 Mobil Chemical Company (1976) Summary of Large Scale Trials: Soy-
beans—Modown ciO'-i Wettable Powder and Modown 2 Ernulsifiable Con-
centrate. (Unpublished study received Oct 8, 1976 under 2224-
50; CDL:226291-T)
000003481 Mobil Chemical Company (1976) Summary of Research Data Supporting
Registration of Modown 4F on Corn. Summary of studies 2237Q1-B
through 223701-T. (Unpublished study received. Mar 9, 1977, under
2224-EX-10; CDL.-228701-A)
000003495 Mobil Chemical Company (1976) Summary of Research Data to Support
Registration of Modown 4F on Sorghum. Summary of studies
228701-V tnrough 228701-AJ. (Unpublished study received Mar 9,
1977 under 2224-EX-10; CDL:223701-U)
000003545 Mobil Chemical Company (1976) Summary of Research Data to Support
Registration of Modown 4F on Soybeans. Summary of studies
228702-B through 228702-Y. (Unpublished study received Mar 9,
1977 under 2224-EX-iO; CDL:228702-A)
000003526 Mobil Chemical Company (1976) Summary of Research Trials: 'Ibbacco.
Suumury of studies 232330-B through 232330-D. (Unpublished
study received Feb 9, 1978 under 2224-50; CDL:232830-A)
000003512 Mobil Cnemical Company (1977?) Modown 4 Flowable—Rice. Summary of
Data Collected under 2224-EUP-10. Summary of studies 232454-F
and 232454-K. (Unpublished study received Dec 5, 1977 under
2224-EX-IO; CDL.-232454-E)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Cications Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
ilRID CITATION
000003510 Mobil Chemical Company (1977) Mobil Chemical Modown Herbicide
Performance Report. (Unpublished study received Dec 5, 1977
under 2224-EX-10; CDL:232454-C)
J00003516 Mobil Oiemical Company (1977) Mobil Chemical Research Report. (Un-
published study received Dec 5, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; CDL:
232454-K)
000003371 Mobil Chemical Company (1977) Mobil Chemical Research Report. (Un-
published study received Apr 11, 1973 under 2224-EX-4; CDL:
233347-A)
000003514 Mobil Chemical Company (1977) Modown 4 Flowable—Sorghum: Summary
of Data Collected under 2224-EUP-10. (Unpublished study re-
ceived Dec 5, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; CDL:232454^)
000003515 Mobil Chemical Company (1977) Modown 4 Flowable—Soybean: Summary
of Data Collected under 2224-EUP-1Q. Summary of studies 232454-
I through 232454-J. (Unpublished study received Dec 5, 1977
under 2224-EX-iO; CDL:232454-H)
000003540 Mobil Chemical Company (1977) Modown 30v^P—Rice: Summary of Data
Collected under 2224-EUP-5. (Unpublished study including un-
dated letter from L. Zaunbrecker to Greg Fuselier, received
Dec 5, 1977 under 2224-EX-5; CDL:232453-D)
000003419 Mobil Chemical Company (1977) Suirraary of Efficacy Data: Modown
30WP—Tobacco. (Unpublished study received Jan 27, 1978 under
2224-EX-14; CDL:232747-A)
OOU003420 Mobil Chemical Company (1977) Summary of Efficacy: Modown 4 Flow-
ablc: Soybean. (Unpublished study received Jan 24, 1978 under
2224-53; CDL:232731-A)
000003535 Mobil Chemical Company (1977) Summary of Large Scale Efficacy Data:
Soybeans—Annual Morning Glory. (Unpublished study received Fcb
9, 1973 under 2224-50; CDL.-232331-M)
000003529 Mobil Chemical Company (1977) Sunnary of Large Scale Efficacy Data:
Tobacco. (Unpublished study received Fcb 9, 1973 under 2224-50;
CDL:232330-S)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprace for
Use in Developing This Standard
i-IRID CITATION
OOOU33418 Mobil Chanical Company (1977) Summary of Preplant Incorporated
Efficacy Data. (Unpublished study received Jan 16, 1978 under
2224-EX-5; CDL:232653-B)
000003525 Mobil Chemical Company (1977) Summary of Residue Data: [Project
Mos. 75017 and 76057]. (Unpublished study received Feb 3. 1973
under 2224-50; CDL:232879-A)
000005878 Mobil Chemical Company (1978) [Efficacy Data on Modown]. Summary
of studies 237708-B through 237703-J. (Unpublished study re-
ceived Mar 2, 1979 under 2224-EX-10; CDL:237708-A)
000005386 Mooil Qieinical Company (1973) Summary of Efficacy: Modown 4 Flow-
able (2224-EUP-17): Soybeans. (Unpublisncd study received
Feb 27, 1979 under 2224-EX-17; CDL:237709-A)
000017240 Moomaw, R.S. (1976) Soybean Herbicide Performance in Narrow Row
Soybeans: Test No. 10540. (Unpublished study received Jan 19,
1977 under 100-583; prepared by Univ. of Nebraska, Northeast
Station, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C..; CDL:
095769-AH)
000003457 Murray, D.; Hill, L.; Santelmann, P.17. (1973) Precmergence ;fced
Control in Sorghum: [Report] No. 73-18. (Unpublished study
received May 7, 1974 under 4G1505; prepared by Oklahoma State
Univ., submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL:093987-T)
000003332 Murray, D.S. (.1975) Preemergence vfeed Control: [Report] No. 75-15.
(Unpublished study received Dec 12, 1975 under unknown admin.
no.; prepared by Auburn Univ., Black Belt Substation, submitted
bv Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:
223555-M) '
000003392 Murray, D.S. (1975) Preplant and Preemergence vfeed Control:: [Re-
port] No. 75-3. (Unpublished study received Dec 12, 1975 under
unknown adain. no.; prepared by Auburn Univ., Gulf Coast Sub-
station, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL:223556-T)
000017244 Murray, D.S.; Sotores, J.K. (1976) Preemergence itoed Control and
Delayed Planting in Soybeans: Test No. 10366. (Unpublisned
study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-533; prepared by Auburn
Univ., Agronomy Depc., submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greens-
boro, N.C.; CDL:095769-AU)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPI-IY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
000003473 Nalewaja, J.D.; Mcssersmith, C.G.; D2xter, A.G. (1971) Summary of
1971 weed Control Trials: Field Crops. (Unpublished study
received May 7, 1974 under 4G1505; prepared by Ltortn Dakota
State Univ., Dept. of Agronomy in cooperation with Univ. of
Minnesota, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chem-
icals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:093937-AS)
000003474 Nalewaja, J.D.; Messcrsmith, C.G.; Miller, S.D.; Dexter, A.G.
(1973) Suimary of 1973 Weed Control Trials: Field Crops. (Un-
published study received May 7, 1974 under 4G1505; prepared by
North Dakota State'Univ., D_>pt. of Agronomy in cooperation with
Univ. of Minnesota, submitted by Mobil Cnemical Co., Industrial
Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:093987-AT)
000017345 Nalewaja, J.D.; Messersmith, C.G.; Miller, S.D.; et ai. (1975) Prc-
emergenco vfced Control in Com, Casselton, 1975: Test No. 10302.
(Unpublished study received Feb 18, 1977 under 100-533; prepared
by North Dakota State Univ. of Agriculture and Applied Science
and Univ. of Minnesota, Dept. of Agronomy in cooperation with
Minot, vtfilliston, Langdon and Carrington Experiment Stations,
submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:223112-AX)
000003490 North American Farms (1976) Modown Herbicide Corn Plots. (Unpub-
lished study received Mar 9., 1977 under 2224-EX-10; submitted by.
Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:
228701-0)
OU0003491 Oakman, J.H. (1975) Research Report to Mobil Chemical Co. (Unpub-
lisned study received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by
Ag-Test, Inc., subraitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chem-
icals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:228701-P)
000016620 Orr, J.P.; Colbert, (1978) 1978—Grain Sorghum Weed Control Tri-
al—Gonsumnes College (Evaluated 7-7-78). (Unpublished study
received Mar 16, 1979 under 100-604; submitted by Ciba-Geigy
Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:237814-E) ;
005005111 Palmer, R.D.; Helpert, C.W. (1974) Rice weed control in the
western belt of Texas. Pages 127-135, In Proceedings of the
Southern vfccd Science Society. Vol. 27. Athens, Ga.:
Soutnern Weed Science Society.
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPIiY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
000004163 Parham, J.; Greer, H.; Santelmann, P.W. (1973) PPI and Procmer-
gonce Weed Control in Soybeans (Perkins). (Unpublished study
received Oct 8, 1976 under 2224-50; prepared by Oklahoma State
Univ., submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL:225291-0)
000004169 Parham, J.R.; Greer, H.; Santelmann, P.W. (1973) PPI and Preemcr-
gence Vfeed Control in Soybeans (Coweta). (Unpublished study
received Oct 8, 1976 under 2224-50; prepared by Oklahoma State
Univ., submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL:226291-P) .
000003552 Parochetti, J. (1975) Soybeans—1975: Preplant Incorporated, Pro-
emergence and Postemcrgence Combinations. (Unpublished study
received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by Univ.. of
Maryland, [Agriculture Experiment Station, Dept. of Agronomy] in
cooperation witn iJye Institute, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co.,
Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL.-22S702-O)
005016755 Parochetti, J.V.; Harris, T.C. (1979) Bifenox alone and with
selected herbicides applied incorporated versus preemergencc
for soybean weed control. Pages 11-16, In Proceedings of tne
Northeastern vfced Science Society. Vol. 33. Painter, Va.:
Virginia Truck and Ornamentals Research Station. (Department
of Agronomy, Maryland Agricultural Experiment Station,
scientific article no. A-2543 and contribution no. 5576)
000003414 Pennsylvania State University, Southeastern Field Research Labora-
tory (1974) 1974 Tobacco Herbicide Trial. (Unpublished study
received Jan 29, 1975 under 2224-EX-14; submitted by Mobil Chem-
ical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:224669-C)
000016322 Peters, R.A. (1974) Summary Statement: Test tto. 10305. (Unpub-
lished study received Feb 18, 1977 under 100-503; submitted by
Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, H.C.; CDL:223107-J)
000015440 Peters, R.A. (1975) [Effect of Herbicides on Crabgrass and Pigweed
Control and Silage Corn Yields]: Test No. 10555. (Unpublished
study received Feb 18, 1977 under 100-583; prepared by Univ. of
Connecticut, Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station, submitted
by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, H.C.; CDL:223115-V)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
005UU4455 Peterson, K.R.; Jennings, V.M.; Staniforth, D.W.; Fawcett, R.S.
(1977) Com herbicide evaluations across Iowa, 1977. Pages
71-73, In Proceedings, Worth Central Weed Control Conference.
Vol. 32. Lincoln, Nebr.: North Central v-fced Control
Conference.
005012007 Poole, R.T.; Waters, W.E. (1974) Influence of several herbicides
on yield of leatherleaf fern. Pages 279-232, In Proceedings of
the Tropical Region, American Sociecy for Horticultural
Science. Vol. 13. (Florida Agricultural Experiment Stations
journal series no. 5462)
005017725 Prairie Farm Rehabilitation Administration (1978) Field trials.
Pages 45-49, In Prairie Farm Rehabilitation Administration,
Tree Nursery, Summary Report, 1977. Indian Head, Saskatchewan,
Canada: Canada Department of Regional Economic Expansion,
Prairie Farm Rehabilitation Administration.
000003369 Quinn, R.J.; Paa, H. (1976) Report to Mobil Chemical Company: 21-
Day Subacute Dermal Toxicity Study with Modown 4 Lb/Gal Flowable
Herbicide in Albino Rabbits: IBT No. 3530-03513. (Unpublished
study received Jan 26, 1977 under 2224-53; prepared by Industri-
al Bio-Test Laboratories, Inc., submitted by Mobil Chemical Co.,
• v Industrial Choraicals, Richmond, Va<.; CDL:223013-G)
000003455 Rains, L.J. (1974) Experiment 13: Bradford—Block 10: Weed Control
in Grain Sorghum. (Unpublished study including letter dated
Feb 5, 1974 from L.J. Rains to Bill Smith, received May 7, 1974
under 4G1505; prepared by Univ. of Missouri, Dept. of Agronomy,
submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Ricnmond,
Va.; CDL:093987-P)
000017071 Raney, R.J. (1977) [Weed Control Research Plot Data!. (Unpublished
study received Get 20, 1973 under 100-533; prepared by Kansas
State Univ., Agronomy Dept., submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp.,
Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:235354-BC)
000003533 Rausina, G. (1972) Report to Mobil Chemical Company, Research and
Development Division: Four-Day Static Fish Toxicity Studies with
MC-4379 Technical in Rainbow Trout and Blucgills: IBT l-to. R2497.
(Unpublished study received Sep 1, 1977 under 2224-53; prepared
by Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories, Inc., submitted by Mobil
Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:231431-C)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAM
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inappropratc for
Use in Developing This Standard
t-lRID
OU5019813
005005395
OOU005338
000003496
0000143G1
000003400
000016205
000004177
CITAP: ON
Research Station, Rcgina, Saskatchewan (1974) Crop tolerance for
new herbicides. Pages 246-246, _In Research Branch Report 1973,
Research Station, Regina, Saskatchewan. Ottawa, Ontario,
Canada: Canada Department of Agriculture.
Research Station, Regina, Saskatchewan_(1974) Weed control. Pages
246-243, In Research Branch Report 1973. Ottawa, Ontario,
Canada: Agriculture Canada.
Richard, E.P., Jr. (1978) Preliminary Field Evaluation of Herbi-
cides in Cotton and Soybeans. (Unpublished study received Feb
27, 1979 under 2224-EX-17; submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., In-
dustrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:237709-C)
Richardson, J.T.; Gordon, E.G.; Frans, R.E. (1976) Herbicide Field
Evaluation Trials on Field Crops, 1976. (Unpublished study re-
ceived Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by Univ. of Arkan-
sas, Agricultural Experiment Station, Dept. of Agronomy, submit-
ted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.;
CDL:228701-V)
Riock, C.E.; Slack, C.H.; Bohn, J.A. (1973) Herbicide Evaluation
Trials—1978. (pp. 1-3,5-10,34-42 only; unpublished study re-
ceived Apr 30, 1979 under 2224-EX-5; prepared by Univ. of Ken-
tucky, Dept. of Agronomy, submitted by Mobil Chemical GD. , In-
dustrial Gaemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:233281-P)
Rieck, C.E.; Slack, C.H.; Herron, J.W. (1973) Results of Herbicide
Evaluation Trials. (Unpublished study received Oct 8, 1976
under 2224-50; prepared by Univ. of Kentucky, Dept. of Agronomy,
submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va.; CDL:226291-G)
Riock, C.E.; Slack, C.H.; Price, J.H.; et al. (1975) Soybean Pro-
emergence, 1975: Test t-Jo. 10743. (Unpublished study received
Jan 19, 1977 under 100-533; prepared by Univ. of Kentucky, Dept.
of Agronomy, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, H.C.;
CDL:095759-M)
Ricck, C.E.; Slack, C.H.; Price, J.H.; Hayes, R.M. (1975) Results
of Herbicide Evaluation Trials, 1975. (Unpublished study re-
ceived Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by Univ. of Ken-
tucky, D3pt. of Agronomy, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., In-
dustrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:228701-J)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
000017245 Roeth, F. (1975) Results of Uniform Soybean Herbicide Trials at
Clay Center, Nebraska, 1975: Test No. 10579. (Unpublished
study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-583; prepared by Univ. of
Nebraska, South Central Station, submitted by Ciba-Gcigy Corp.,
Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:095769-BC)
000003498 Roeth, F.»V. (1976) vfeed Control in Irrigated Grain Sorghum. (Un-
published study received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared
by Univ. of Nebraska, Agricultural Experiment Station, submitted
by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Riciimond, Va.; CDL:
223701-AB)
000004205 Rogers, L. (1972) Preemergence Eierbicide Screening Trial. (Unpub-
lished study received May 14, 1975 under 2224-50; prepared by
Louisiana State Univ. [and Agricultural and Mechanical College],
submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va.; CDL:224427-H)
000004206 Rogers, L. (1972) Preemergence Herbicide Screening Trial. (Unpub-
lished study received May 14, 1976 under 2224-50; prepared by
Louisiana State Univ. [and Agricultural and Mechanical College],
submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va.; CDL:224427-I)
000003573 Rogers, L. (1975) Experiment:: Uniform Preemergcnce Surface Applied
Herbicide Test. (Unpublished study received May 14, 1976 under
2224-50; prepared by Louisiana State Univ. [and Agricultural and
Mechanical College] , ^Jortheasc. Experiment Station, submitted by
Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:
224427-M)
000016648 Rogers, R.L.; et al. (1975) Preemergence Surface Applied Herbi-
cides: Test No. 10948. (Unpublished study received Jan 19, 1977
under 100-583; prepared by Louisiana State Univ., Agricultural
Experiment Station, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro,
N.C.; CDL:095759-W)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judgc3d to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
CITATION
000003570 Rogers, R.L.; Zaunorecher, S.J.; Vidrino, P.R. ; Crawford, S.H.;
Phillips, S.A.; Marshall, J.G.; Melville, D.R.; Trahan, G.
(1972) Soybean "vfeed Control Research: Progress Report — 1972.
(Unpublished study received May 14, 1975 under 2224-50; prepared
by Louisiana State Univ. [and Agricultural and Mechanical Col-
lege] , Agricultural Experiment Station, submitted by Mobil Chem-
ical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:224427-J)
000003401 Rogers, R.L.; Zaunbrecher, S.J.; Vidrine, P.R.; Crawford, S.II.;
Phillips, S.A.; Marshall, J.G.; Melville, D.R. ; Trahan, G.
(1972) Soybean Weed Control Research: Progress Report— 1972.
(Unpublished study received Oct 3, 1976 under 2224-50; prepared
by Louisiana State Univ. [and Agricultural and Mechanical
College] , Dept. of Plant Pathology, Agricultural Experiment
Station, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL-.226291-H)
000013400 Ross, M.A.; Williams, J.L. , Jr., Bauman, T.T.; et al. (1974) Stand-
ard Soybeans II, 1974: Test No. 10164. (Unpublished study re-
ceived Sep 13, 1977 under 100-523; prepared by Purdue Univ.,
Botany and Plant Pathology Dept., submitted by Ciba-Gcigy Corp.,
Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:.231563-R)
000017630 .Ross, R.H. (1973) To Provide Bridging Data between Dual 6E and 8E
on Soybeans: Test: No. NE OH 203 77. (Unpublished study received
Mar 1, 1978 under 100-597; submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp.,
Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:232946-I)
000017636 Ross, R.H. (1973) To Provide Bridging Data To Show Dual 6E Is Bio-
logically Equivalent to Dual 8E and To Test Dual + Modown: Test
No. NE OH 108 77. (Unpublished study received Mar 1, 1978 under
100-597; submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:
232947-H)
000016410 Ross, R.H., Jr. (1975) Evaluate Herbicide Combinations for Pre Weed
Control in Soybeans: Tesn No. NE OH 111 75. (Unpublished study
received Nov 25, 1975 under 100-EX-43; submitted by Ciba-Geigy
Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:094329-F)
000016323 Rud, O.E. (1975) Preliminary Evaluation of Herbicides on Field and
Sweet Corn: Test No. 10302. (Unpublished study received Feb 18,
1977 under 100-533; prepared by Virginia Polytechnic Institute
and State Univ. , Tidewater Research .and Continuing Education
Center, Dept. of Plant Patnology, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp.,
Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:228107-U)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
000004132 Russ, O.G. (1974) Weed Control Research Plot Data. (Unpublished
study received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by Kansas
State Univ., Agronomy Dipt., submitted by Mobil Chemical Co.,
Indus trial Chemicals, Ricnoiond, Va.; CDL:223701-Y)
000018639 Russ, O.G. (1975) Weed Control Research Plot Data: Test Wo. 10575.
(Unpublished study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-583; prepared
by Kansas State Univ., Agronomy Dept., submitted oy Ciba-Geigy
Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:095754-H)
000013693 Russ, O.G. (1975) VJeed Control Research Plot Data: Test No. 10742.
(Unpublished study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-533; prepared
by Kansas State Univ., Agronomy Dept., submitted by Ciba-Geigy
Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; • CDL:095762-B)
000005375 Russ, O.G. (1976) Report of 1976 Herbicide Data: Keeping Up with
Research....Ito. 29. (pp. 25-36 only; contribution no. 1530-E;
unpublished study received iiar 23, 1979 under CO 79/7; prepared
by Kansas State Univ., Agronomy Dept., submitted by Mobil Gnomi-
cal Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:237942-F)
000017059 Russ, O.G. (1977) ['/feed Control Research Plot Data and Herbicide
Performance of Corn, 1977]: Test No. 11518a. (Unpublished study
<,. .. received Qct 20, 1978 under 100-533,; prepared by Kansas State
Univ., Agronomy Dept., submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greens-
boro, H.C.; CDL:235354-AF)
000005876 Russ, O.G. (1977) Weed Control Research Plot Data. (Unpublished
study received Mar 28, 1979 under CO 79/7; prepared in coopera-
tion with Kansas State Univ., Dept. of Agronomy, submitted by
Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond Va.; CDL:
237942-G)
000014371 Russ, O.G. (1973) Weed Control Researcn Plot Data. (Unpublished
study received Apr 30, 1979 under 2224-EX-5; prepared by Kansas
State Univ., Dept. of Agronomy, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co.,
Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:233231-Z)
000016105 Russ, O.G.; Axtholm, L. (1975) Report of 1975 Herbicide Data. By
Kansas State Univ. of Agriculture and Applied Science, Dept. of
Agronomy. Manhattan, Kans.: KSU. (Keeping up with re-
search. .. .no. 22; pp. 24-25 only; test no. 10742; also In unpub-
lished submission received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-583; submitted
by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:095751-M)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
.'IRID CITATION
000018692 Russ, O.G.; Raney, R.J. (1975) Report of 1975 Herbicide Data. By
Kansas State Univ. of Agriculture and Applied Science, Dept. of
Agronomy. Manhattan, Kans.: KSU. (Keeping up with re-
search. .. .no. 22; pp. 22-23 only; test no. 10742; also In unpub-
lished submission received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-583; submitted
by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, H.C.; CDL:095751-AO)
000014374 Russ, O.G.; Sloan, R.F.; Knight, C.; et al. (1975) Weed Control Re-
search Plot Data. (Unpublished study received Jun 5, 1979 under
N3 79/8; prepared by Kansas State Univ., Agronomy Dept., submit-
ted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.;
CDL:233572-1)
000014375 Russ, O.G.; Sloan, R.F.; Knight, C.W.; et al. (1976) Weed Control
Research Plot Data. (Unpublished study received Jun 5, 1979
under NB 79/8; prepared by Kansas State Univ., Agronomy Dept.,
submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va.; CDL:238572-J)
005011014 Sato, K.; Tamura, J.; Kuriharar, T., inventors; Hokko Chemical
Industry Co., assignee (1975) Josozai soseibutsu. [A herbicide
component.] Japanese kokai 75-125030. Oct 1. 4 p. Int.
(-1
V-J. .
000004208 Scnrader, J.,v'.; Haskins, W.F. (1972) The Preliminary Valuation of
Preemergcnce Herbicides for Use ii Soybean Production. (Unpub-
lished study received May 14, 1976 under 2224-50; prepared by
North Carolina State Univ., submitted by Mobil Chemical Co.,
Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:224427-Q)
000003405 Schrdder, J.W.; Haskins, W.F. (1974) Experiment: H-133—The Prelim-
inary Evaluation of Herbicides for Use in Soybean Production:
Project Wo. 3378. (Unpublished study received Oct 3, 1976 under
2224-50; prepared by [North Carolina State Univ.], Agricultural
Experiment Station, Tidewater Research Station, submitted by
Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:
226291-M)
000003406 Schrader, J.W.; Haskins, W.F. (1974) Tho Preliminary Evaluation of
Herbicides for Use in Soybean Production. (Unpublished study
received Oct 8, 1976 under 2224-50; prepared by [North Carolina
State Univ., Agricultural Experiment Station, Tidewater Research
Station], submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL:226291-N)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPIiY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
i-lRID CITATION
000016393 Schrib, J. (1975) Com—Pre-emergence: Test No. 10647. (Unpub-
lished study received Jun 20, 1977 under 100-590; prepared by
Texas A & M Univ., Agricultural Experiment Station, submitted by
Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:230676-G)
000004180 Schrib, J.V. (1975) Weed Control and Com Yields fraa Pre-emergence
Herbicide Applications, 1975. (Unpublished study including
wcathor and application data, received i-lar 9, 1977 under 2224-
EX-10; prepared by Texas A $ 14 Univ., Agricultural Experiment
Station, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL.-223701-T)
005004664 Seim, A.L.; Jennings, V.tl. (1975) Soybean herbicide evaluations
across Iowa in 1975. Pages 54-53, In Proceedings of the North
Central Weed Control Conference. Vol. 30. Lincoln, Nebr.:
North Central Weed Control Conference.
005004552 Selleck, G.W.; Sanok, 'W.J. (1973) Herbicide candidates for weed
control in cabbage. Pages 226-229, In Proceedings of the
Northeastern Weed Science Society. Vol. 32. Painter, Va.:
Northeastern Weed Science Society.
000016361 Sloan, R.F. (1975) Report of 1975 Herbicide Data. By Kansas State
. . Univ. of. Agriculture and Applied Science, Dept.. of Agronomy.
Manhattan, Kans.: K3U. (Keeping up with research....no. 22; pp.
4-5 only; test no. 10742; also In unpublished submission re-
ceived Feb 13, 1977 under 100-583; submitted by Ciba-Goigy
Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:228107-BE)
000016149 Sloan, R.F. (1975) Weed Control Research Plot Data: Test No. 10742.
(Unpublished study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-533; prepared
by Kansas State Univ., Agronomy Dept., submitted by Ciba-Geigy
Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:095762-AH)
005011918 Smith, R.J., Jr. (1974) Herbicide combinations for weed control.
Rice Journal 77(7):3i-32.
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD 3IBLIOGRAPI-JY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Daveloping This Standard-
MRID CITATION
000005334 Smith, R.J., Jr. (1973) Effect of Selected Herbicide Treatments on
Control of Aquatic Weeds in Drill-Seeded Rice: Values Arc Aver-
ages of 2 Replicates: (1001-16-78): Table. (Unpublished study
including letter dated Jan 15, 1979 from R.J. Smith, Jr., to
Jim Caudill, received Mar 2, 1979 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by
U.S. Science and Education Administration, Federal Research,
Southern Region, Rice Production and Weed Control Research, sub-
mitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va.; CDL;23770S-I)
000005383 S-nith, R.J., Jr. (1973) Effect of Selected Herbicide Treatments on
Control of Aquatic Weeds in Water-Seeded Rice: Values Are Aver-
ages of 2 Replicates: (1001-15-78): Table. (Unpublished study
including letter dated Jan 15, 1979 from R.J. Smith, Jr., to
Jim Caudill, received Mar 2, 1979 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by
U.S. Science and Education Administration, Federal Research,
Southern Region, Rice Production and Weed Control Research,
submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va.; CDL:237703-H)
000005332 Smith, R.J., Jr. (1973) Effect of Selected Herbicide Treatments on
Control of Weeds in Drill-Seeded Rice: Values Arc Averages of 2
. . Replicates: (1001-14-78): Table.,. (Unpublisned study including
letter dated Jan 15, 1979 from R.J. Smitn, Jr. to Jim Caudill,
received Mar 2, 1979 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by U.S. Science
and Education Administration, Federal Research, Southern Region,
Rice Production and Weed Control Rescarcn, submitted by Mobil
Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:237708-G)
01)0003449 dmitil, R.L. (1974) Herbicidal Control of Weeds in Corn, Cotton,
Grain Sorghum, Peanuts, and Soybeans—1973: WFES RR ARCJ 74-2.
(Unpublished study received May 7, 1974 under 4G1505; prepared
by (Univ. of Florida], Agricultural Research Center, submitted
by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:
093987-J)
005004452 Smith, W.T. (1973) Modown—a new broadleaf herbicide. Pages
31-32, In Proceedings of the Western Society of Weed Science.
Vol. 25. Boise, Idaho: Western Society of Weed Science.
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGKAilS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
005005457 Smith, W.T.; Adams, D.R.; Cihacek, D.J.; Vannoy, R.K.; Dregor,
R.H. (1976) Bifenox: results of the 1975 experimental permit on
small grains and sorghum. Pages 97, In Proceedings of the
Western Society of :/feed Science. Vol. 29. Boise, Idaho:
western Society of ifeed Science.
005004&66 Jouth, D.; Crowley, R.H.; Gjerstad, D.H. (1976) Recent herbicide
wood control results in pine seedbeds. Pages
300-308, In Proceedings of the Southern Ueed Science Society.
Vol. 29. Athens, Ga.: Southern Uecd Science Society.
005011919 South, D.3.; Gjerstad, D.H.; Crowiey, R.H. (1973) Bifenox: a
promising new herbicide for southorn pine nurseries. Southern
Journal of Applied Forestry 2(1):11-14.
000017687 Stahlberg, L. (1978) Evaluate Dual + Dyanap, + Premergc, + Amiben,
•and Modown for i-fccd Control in Soybeans: Test No. 04 OH 010 77.
(Unpuolished study received Mar 1, 1978 under 100-597; submitted
by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:232947-J)
000017643 Staiilberg, L. (1978) Evaluate Dual and Dual Combinations on .Sorghum
Treated with CGA-43089 (MSOT): Test No. 04 OH 012 77. (Unpub-
lished study received Jul 12, 1978 under 100-590; submitted by
. . Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:234416-L)
000016064 Staniforth, D. (1975) [Comparison of Dual 6E with Various Vfced Con-
trol CompoundsJ: Test No. 10625. (Unpublished study received
Jan 19, 1977 under 100-533; prepared by Iowa State Univ., sub-
mitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, U.C.; CDL:095754-U)
000016063 Staniforth, D.; Miller, G. (1975) [Comparison of Dual 6E and Vari-
ous '.teed Control Compounds!: Test No. 10624. (Unpublished study
received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-533; prepared by Iowa State
Univ., submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, M.C.; CDL:
095754-T)
000016368 Staniforth, D.W. (1975) Preemcrgence Herbicides for Com, Amos,
Iowa, 1975, No. 1: Test No. 10713. (Unpublished study received
Feb 18, 1977 under 100-53J; prepared by Iowa State Univ., Agri-
cultural Experiment Station, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp.,
Greensboro, H.C.; CDL-.228107-BN)
000017243 Stanifortn, D.W. (1975) Preamergence Herbicid •;: for Soybeans. (Un-
published study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-5U3; prepared by
Iowa State Univ. of Science and Technology, Agricultural Experi-
ment Station, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp.,. Greensboro, N.C.;
095769-BL)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
ilRID CITATION
000016215 Staniforth, D.tf. (1975) Preemergonce Herbicides for Soybeans: Test
Ito. 10623. (Unpublished study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-
533; prepared by Iowa State Univ., Agricultural Experiment Sta-
tion, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:
095759-AB)
000017343 Stanifortii, D.W. (1975) Preplant Incorporated Herbicides for Corn,
ATIOS, Iowa, 1975: Test No. 10713. (Unpublished study received
Feb 13, 1977 under 100-533; prepared by Iowa State Univ. of
Science and Technology, Agricultural Experiment Station,, submit-
ted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, H.C.; CDL:228112-AT)
000014354 Staniforth, D.W.; Fawcett, R.S.; Jennings, V.M.; et al. (1978)
Evaluation of Soybean Herbicides at the Northern Iowa Research
Center, Site #2, Kanawha, Iowa, 1978. (Unpublished study re-
ceived Apr 30, 1979 under 2224-EX-5; prepared by Iowa State
Univ., Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Coop-
erative Extension Service, submitted by ;tobil Chemical Co.,
Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:238281-1)
000013732 Staniforth, D.H.; Jennings, V.M. (1976) Evaluation of Pro-emergence
Herbicides for Corn, Ames, Iowa, 1976: Test No. 11103. (Unpub-
lished study received'Nov 10, 1977 under 100-EX-59; prepared by
Iowa State Univ. of Science and Technology, Agriculture and Home
Economics Experiment Station, Cooperative Extension Service,
submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:232199-G)
000017036 Staniforth, D.W.; Jennings, V.M.; Fawcett, R.S. (1977) Evaluation
of Preplant Incorporated Herbicides for Corn at Ames, Iowa,
1977: Test No. 11520a. (Unpublished study received Get 20, 1973
under 100-533; prepared by Iowa State Univ. of Science and Tech-
nology, Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station,
Cooperative Extension Service, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp.,
Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:235353-AA)
00001^357 Stanifocth, D.iV.; Jennings, V.M.; Fawcett, R.S. (1978) [Ilodown 30WP
Preplant Incorporated and Modown 4F 80WP Preemergence on Soy-
beans] . (Unpublished study received Apr 30, 1979 'under 2224-EX-
5; prepared by Iowa State Univ., submitted by Mobil- Chemical .
Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:238281-L)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing Tnis Standard
ilRID CITATION
000014355 Staniforth, D.W.; Jennings, V.M.; Fav/cett, R.S. (1973) Evaluation
of Preplant Incorporated and Preemergence Soybean Herbicides at
Ames, Iowa, 1978. (Unpublished study received Apr 30, 1979
under 2224-EX-5; prepared by Iowa State Univ., Agriculture and
Home Economics Experiment Station, Cooperative Extension Ser-
vice, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL:238281-J)
000017033 Staniforth, DM.; Jennings, V.M.; Fav/cett, R.S.; et al. (1977)
Evaluation of Corn Herbicides at the McNay Memorial Research
Center, Chariton, Iowa, 1977: Test No. 11520d. (Unpublished
study received Oct 20, 1978 under 100-533; prepared by Iowa
State Univ. of Science and Technology, Agriculture and Hone
Economics Experiment Station, Cooperative Extension Service,
submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:235353-X)
000017037 Stanifortn, D.iV.; Jennings, V.M.; Fawcett, R.S.; et al. (1977)
Evaluation of Corn Herbicides at the Northern Iowa Research Cen-
ter, Kanawha, Iowa, 1977: Test No. 11520c. (Unpublisned study
received Oct 20, 1973 under 100-533; submitted by Ciba-Geigy
Corp., Greensboro, U.C.; CDL:235353-AC)
000014356 Staniforca, D.VM".; Jennings, V.M.; Fawcett, R.S.; ct al. (1978)
Evaluation of Soybean Herbicides at the Mo^ti.yjast Iowa Research
Center, Nashua, Iowa, 1978. (Unpublished study received Apr 30,
1979 under 2224-EX-5; prepared by Iowa State Univ., Agriculture
and Home Economics Experiment Station, Cooperative Extension
Service, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL:238281-K)
000016894 Staniforth, D.W.; Jennings, V.M.; Seim, A. (1976) Evaluation of
Herbicides in Corn, McNay Memorial Research Center, Lucas Coun-
ty, Iowa, 1976. (Unpublished study received Jun 20, 1977 under
100-590; prepared by Iowa State Univ. of Science and Technology,
Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Stacion, Cooperative
Extension Service, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro,
N.C.; CDL:230676-H)
000016396 Staniforth, D.W.; Jennings, V.M.; Studt, D.; et al. (1976) Evalua-
tion of Herbicides for Com at the North Iowa Experimental Farm,
Kanawha, Iowa, 1976. (Unpublished study received Jun 20, 1977
under 100-590; prepared by Iowa State Univ. of Science and 'tech-
nology, Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Coop-
erative Extension Service, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp.,
Greensboro, W.C.; CDL:230676-J)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
•REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to bo Lnapproprate for
Uso in Developing This Standard
flRID CITATION
000018740 Staniforth, D.W.; Jennings, V.M.; Studt, D.; et al. (1976) Evalua-
tion of Herbicides for Corn at the North Iowa Experimental Farm,
Kanawha, Iowa, 1975: Test No. 11102. (Unpublisned study re-
ceived Sep 19, 1977 under 100-EX-53; prepared by Iowa State
Univ. of Science and Technology, Agriculture and Home Economics
Experiment Station, Ccoperacive Extension Service, submitted by
Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, M.C.; CDL:233128-G)
000018744 Staniforth, D.W.; Jennings, V.M., Fav/cett, R.S.; et al. (1977)
Evaluation of Corn Herbicides at tne Northeast Iowa Researcii
Center, Nasnua, Iowa, 1977: Test No. 11520e. (Unpublished study
received Get 20, 1973 under 100-533; prepared by Iowa State
Univ. of Science and Technology, Agriculture .and Home Economics
Experiment Station, Cooperative Extension Service, submitted by
Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:235353-P)
000003469 StempKc, L.W. (1972) Weed Control Investigations: winter and Spring
Annual Weed Control in Small Grains. (Unpublished study re-
ceived May 7, 1974 under 4G1505; prepared by [Montana State
Univ.], Central Agricultural Research Center, submitted .by Mobil
Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:093937-
AO)
000004199 Stewart, R.E. (1977) Herbicides for weed control in western forest
nurseries. Proceedings, Western Society of iveed Science
30( ): 78 - 39. (Also _In unpublished submission received
Apr 11, 1978 under VJA 78/12; submitted by; CDL.-235633-A)
000003542 Stewart, R.E.; Vfcatherly, H.G. (1978) Evaluation of Six Herbicides
for ifeed Control in Pacific Coast Forest Nurseries. (Unpub-
lished study received Apr 11, 1978 under vJA 78/12; prepared by
U.S. Forest Service, Div. of Timber Management Research,, a
Forestry Sciences Laboratory, submitted by; CDL:23563o-B)
005019964 Stoct, K.G.; Jefferies, C.J.; Belcher, A. (1975) Tolerance of
strawberries to new heroicides. Pages 25-26, In Long Asnton
Research Station, The National Fruit and Cider Institute:
Report 1974. Bristol, England: University of Bristol, Long
Ashton Researcn Station.
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing Tnis Standard
MRID CITATION
OOOOU3563 Strand, O.E.; v/arnes, D.D. (1975) Herbicide Performance on Spring
Wheat at Morris, Minnesota in 1975. (Minnesota Agricultural Ex-
periment Station, Scientific journal series, papsr no. 9270; un-
published study received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared
by Univ. of Minnesota, Dept. of Agronomy and Plant Genetics,
submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va.; CDL:223702-AG).
000017603 Stroube, E.W. (1976) Com—1976. (Unpublished study received Oct
20, 1978 'under 100-583; prepared by Ohio Agricultural Research
and Development Center and Ohio State Univ., submitted by Ciba-
GcigyCorp., Greensboro, H.C.; CDL:235354-BH)
000018746 Sweet, R.D. (1977) Sweet Com Follow-Up: Test No. 11433a. (Unpub-
lished study received Get 20, 1978 under 100-533; prepared by
Cornell Univ., Dept. of Vegetable Crops, submitted by Ciba-
Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:235354-AV)
000017304 Talbert, R.E.; Frans, R.E.; Blythe, T.O.; et al. (1971) Field
Screening of New Chemicals for Herbicidal Activity, 1971. By
Univ. of Arkansas, Agricultural Experiment Station. Fayette-
ville, Ark: UA. (Mimeograpn series 195; also _In unpublished
submission received Mar 17, 1975 under 33329-2; submitted by
Consolidated Chemical Co., Denver, Colo.;. CDL:225259-T).
00501U078 Talbert, R.E.; Frans, R.E.; McClelland, M.R. (1977) Field
Screening of New Chemicals for Herbicidal Activity, 1977.
Fayetteville, Ark.: University of Arkansas, Agricultural
Experiment Station. (Arkansas /Agricultural Experiment Station
mimeograph series no. 253)
000014353 Talbert, R.E.; Frans, R.E.; McClelland, M.R. (1973) Field Screening
of New Chemicals for Herbicidal Activity, 1973. (Unpublished
study received Apr 30, 1979 under 2224-EX-5; prepared by Univ.
of Arkansas, Agricultural Experiment Station, Bspt. of Agronomy,
submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va..; CDL.-233281-M)
000004204 Talbert, R.E.; Frans, R.E.; Ramthun, L.E. (1974) Field screening of
new chemicals for herbicidal activity, 1974. Fayetteville,
(Mimeograph series 226; also In unpublished submission received
under 2224-50; submitted by Mobil domical Co., Industrial Chem-
icals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:222427-C)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Uso in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
005019553 Talbert, R.E.; Hodges, L. (1970) Soil factors affecting the
adsorption and activity of bifenox [-abstract] . Pages
233-283, _In Proceedings of the Southern Weed Science .'Society.
Vol. 31. Athens, Ga.: Southern Weed Science Society.
005005113 Tamura, J.; tiara, T. (1976) Hcrbicidal activity of bifenox in
transplanted rice paddies. Pages 253-255, _In Proceedings of
Fifth Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference; 1975,
Tokyo, Japan.
000017679 Taylor, T.D. (1978) 'To Evaluate Several Dual Combinations on Soy-
bean and 'To Compare A 8E with A 6E Formulation: Test No. MW OH
406 77. (Unpublished study received Mar 1, 1978 under 100-597;
submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:232946-H)
005005265 Teem, D.H.; Crowlcy, R.H.; Buchanan, G.A.; Hoveland, C.S. (1977)
Response of six Ipomoea sp. and two Cassia sp. to
postemergenco applied herbicides. Pages 136, _In Proceedings of
the Southern i-fccd Science Society. Vol. 30. Athens, Ga.:
Southern weed Science Society.
000014372 Thiisted, E.; Murray, D.S. (1978) '.feed Control in Soybeans with
Preplant Incorporated, Preemergence, and Postemergence Applied
, . Herbicides. (Unpublished study received Apr 30,. 1979 .under
2224-EX-5; prepared by Oklahoma State Univ., submitted by Mobil
Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:
238231-AA)
000003422 Thompson, W.; Smith, S. (1977) Final Report to Mobil Chemical
Company- Three-Generation Reproduction Study with Bifenox in
Albino Rats: IBT No. 623-06793. (Unpublished study including
letters dated Dec 19, 1977 from T. Ellison to R.il. Schweikher,
and Jan 6, 1977 from J.C. Calandra to A.J. Huvar, received Dec
21, 1977 under 2224-50; prepared by Industrial Bio-Test Labora-
tories, Inc. in cooperation witn Bob iJest Associates, Inc. and
Donald A. Willigan, Inc., submitted by Mobil Chemical Co.,
Industrial Chemicals, Riciimond, Va.; CDL:232517-A)
000016915 Threewitt, T. (1977) To Obtain Additional Data and Cross Over [sic]
Data for Dual 3E, Dual + Aatrex Prepack and Dual + Bladax for
Corn: Test ito. MW OH 304 77. (Unpublished study received Nov
10, 1977 under 100-EX-59; submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp.,, Greens-
boro, N.C.; CDL:232196-E)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
i-IRID CITATION
000016859 Threewitt, T. (1977) To Obtain Additional Information on the Spec-
trum of Activity of CGA-43089: Test Ito. MW OH 308 77. (Unpub-
lished study received Nov 8, 1977 under 10G-EX-60; submitted by
Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:096616-D)
000015494 Threewitt, T. (1977) To Obtain Additional Information on the Spec-
trum of Activity of CGA-43039: Test: No. MvV OH 308 77. (Unpub-
lished study received Nov 14, 1977 under 100-EX-51; submitted by
Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, M.C.; CDL:096613-H)
000016493 'Thrcewitt, T. (1977) To Obtain Data for Labeling Dual and Dual Com-
bos on Sorghum Which Has Been Treated with CGA-43039 and To Look
at CGA-43039 Spectrum of Activity: Test Ho. MW OH 307 77. (Un-
published study received Nov 14, 1977 under 100-EX-61; submitted
by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:096618-G)
000017659 Threewitt, T. (1978) To Obtain Additional Data and Cross Over Data
for Dual 8E, Dual + Aatrex Prepack and Dual -t- Bladex for Corn:
Test No. MW OH 304 77. (Unpublished study received Mar 1, 1978
under 100-597; submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.;
CDL:232945-C)
000017129 Threewitt, T. (1978) To Obtain Additional. Information on the Spec-
.. trura of Activity of CGA-43089: 'Test Ho. MW. OH 308 77. . (Unpub-,
lisned study received Jul 12, 1978 under 100-590; submitted by
Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:234413-B)
000016571 Threewitt, T. (1978) To Obtain Data for Labeling Dual and Dual Com-
bos on Sorghum which lias Been Treated with CGA-43039 and To Look
at CGA-43039 Spectrum of Activity: Test ffo. MvJ OH 307 77. (Un-
published study received Jul 12, 1978 under 100-597; submitted
by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:234408-Q)
005007211 Thurston, R. (1965) Effect of insecticides on the green peach
aphid, ilyzus persicae (Sulzer), infesting burley tobacco.
Journal of Economic Entomology 53(6):1127-1130.
005013690 Tosh, G.C. (1975) New herbicides for the control of weeds in
direct sown rice on upland soil. Indian Journal of Farm
Sciences 111:60-63.
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
rlRID CITATION
000017431 Triplett, G. (1974) H-306-4-B-74: Tost No. 10307. (Unpublished
study received itov 10, 1977 under 100-EX-59; prepared by Oliio
Agricultural Research and Development Center, submitted by Ciba-
Gsigy Corp., Greensboro, H.C.; CDL:232201-H)
OOU014363 Triplett, G.B. (1973) Weed Control in Soybeans: Project No. H-306-
8-3-78. (Unpublished study received Apr 30, 1979 under 2224-EX-
5; prepared by Ohio Agricultural Research -and Development Cen-
ter, submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL:233231-R)
000014364 Triplett, G.B.; Cooper, R.L. (1973) Soybean Row Width X vfced Con-
trol Requirements: Project No. H-306-9-B-78. (Unpublished study
received Apr 30, 1979 under 2224-EX-5; prepared by 'Ohio Agricul-
tural Research and Development Center, submitted by Mobil Chem-
ical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:2332b!l-S)
000014365 Triplett, G.B.; Jeffers, D. (1978) Weed Control in Relay Crop Soy-
besns [sic]: Project No. H-306-14-B-78. (Unpublished study re-
ceived Apr 30, 1979 under 2224-EX-5; prepared by Ohio Agricul-
tural Research and Development Center, submitted by Mobil Chem-
ical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:2332l!l-T)
005006915 Triplett, G.B., Jr.. (1978.) 'Weed control for doublecrop soybeans
planted with the no-tillage method following small grain
harvest. Agronomy Journal 70(4):577-581.
005020389 Turner, F.T. (1979) Soil nitrification retardation by rice
pesticides. Soil Science Society of America Journal
43(5):955-957.
000017238 Tweedy, J.A.; Rutledge, T.; Kolweier, W. (1975) 1975 Progress Re-
port: Weed Control Studies: Test No. 10693. (Unpublished study
received Jan 19. 1977 under 100-533; prepared by Southern
Illinois Univ., Plant and Soil Science D2pt., Agronomy Research
Center, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL;
095769-U)
000003416 Union Carbide Corporation (1976) Acute Toxicity of Mobil Modown
Herbicide (30% Wet table Powder) to Bluegill Sunfisn— Liipomis
macrochirus Rafinesque, and Rainbow Trout— Salmo gairdneri
Richardson. (Unpublished study received Nov 18, 1976 under
2224-80; submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chanioals,
Richmond, Va.; CDL:22-5901-A)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprato for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
OJ0005569 Velsicol Chemical Corporation (1972) Summary: [Tank Mixtures of
Dicamba + Bronoxynil and Dicumba + Brornoxynil + MCPA for Weed
Control]. (Unpubiisned study received Jan 3, 1973 under 876-25;
CDL:005050-A)
0000io933 Vengris, J. (l'J74) Annual Weed Control in Field Corn, 1974: Test
No. 10270. (Unpublished study received Jan 6, 1976 under 100-
EX-33; prepared by Univ. of Massacnusetts, Dapt. of Plane and
Soil Sciences, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.;
CDL:223432-E)
005005799 Vengris, J. (1975) Annual weed control in field com 1974. Pages
58-70, _In Proceedings of the Nortneastern Weed Science .Society.
Vol. 29. Painter, Va.: Northeastern vfeed Science Society.
005009228 Vengris, J. (1977) Annual weed control in field corn. Pages
1-5, _In Proceedings of the Northeastern Vfceu Science Society.
Vol.31. Painter, Va.: Virginia Truck and Ornamentals Research
Station. (Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station paper
no. 2039)
000003537 Vilkas, A.G. (1977) Acute Toxicity .of Bifenox 933 Tec mical to the
Water Flea Daphnia magna Straus: ES Proj. ^11506-05-02. (Un-
pubiisned study received Sep 1, 1977 under 2224-53;. prepared by
Union Carbide Corp., submitted by ifobil Chemical Co., Industrial
Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:231481-B)
000004193 wax, L.M. (1973) Evaluation of Herbicides in Soybeans, 1973. (Un-
published study received Feb 9, 1973 under 2224-50; prepared by
U.S. Agricultural Research Service, itorth Central Region in
cooperation with Univ. of Illinois—Urbana, Dapt. of Agronomy,
submitted by :-lobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Ricnmond,
Va.; CDL:232S3i-H)
000016140 wax, L.M. (1D74) Evaluation of Herbicides in Soybeans, 1974: Test
No. 10100. (Unpublished study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-
583; prepared by Univ. of Illinois, submitted by Ciba-Geigy
Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:095752-N)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inappropratc for
Use in Developing Tnis Standard
»1RID CITATION .
000003333 Wax, L.M. (1975) Evaluation of Herbicides in Soybeans, 1975. (Un-
published study received Dec 12, 1975 under unknown admin, no.;
prepared by Univ. of Illinois, Dept. of Agronomy in cooperation
with U.S. Agricultural Research Service, North Central Region,
submitted by Mobil Giemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va.; CDL:223556-N)
000003548 Wax, L.M. (1975) Evaluation of Herbicides in .Soybeans, 1975. (Un-
published study received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-1Q; prepared
by U.S. Agricultural Research Service, ttorth Central Region in
cooperation with Univ. of Illinois, Dept. of Agronomy, submitted
by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:
228702-1)
000017242 Wax, L.M. (1975) Evaluation of Herbicides in Soybeans, 1975: Test
t-fo. 10491. (Unpublished study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-
583; prepared by Univ. of Illinois, Dopt. of Agronomy, submitted
by Ciba-Geigy Corp.., Greensboro, H.C.; CDL:Q957S9-AM)
000003562 Webb, F.J. (1975) Barley and Wheat Herbicide Trials, (pp. 20-22
only; 1975 Wheat and Barley Review, Aug, 1975; unpublished
study received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by Univ.
of Delaware, Cooperative Extension Service, submitted by Mobil
,, Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,. Va.; CDL:223702-
AF)
000003486 Wells, I. (1975) Herbicide Demonstration Plots. (Unpublished study
received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by Van Diest
Supply Co., submitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemi-
cals, Richmond, Va.; CDL.-228701-G)
000003575 Wheeler, C. (1975) Tests Conducted by Charles Wheeler. (Unpub-
lished study received May 14, 1975 under 2224-50; prepared by
Riverside Chemical Co., Div. of Cook Industries, Inc., submitted
by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:
224427-P)
000018392 Whitwell, T.; Santelman, P.W. (1976) PPI, Pro and Sequential Treat-
ments for Weed Control in Soybeans: Test No. 10848. (Unpub-
lished study received Sep 13, 1977 under 100-523; prepared by
Oklahoma State Univ., submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro,
N.C.; CDL:231563-I)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inapproprato for
Use in Developing This Standard
MRID CITATION
000003456 vVicks, G.A.'(1973) Preemergonce and Postemergence Herbicides for
Selective weed Control in Sorghum: Project cfo. 43-2. (Unpub-
lished study received May 7, 1974 under 4G1505; prepared by
Univ. of Nebraska, Uorth Piatte Station, submitted by Mobil
Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:093987-S)
000016359 Wiese, A.F. (1974) 1974 Preliminary Research Report: Corn '.feed Con-
trol Studies: Test No. 10396. (Unpublished study received Fab
13, 1977 under 100-583; submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greens-
boro, N.C.; CDL:228107-BB)
000003377 Wiese, A.F. (1975) Pro-emergence Trial on Corn. (Unpublished study
received Dec 12, 1975 under unknown acfcnin. no.; prepared by
Southwest Great Plains Research Center, submitted by Mobil Chem-
ical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:223555-F)
000018719 Williams, J.L., Jr.; Bauman, T.T.; Ross, M.A.; et al. (1975) 1975
Com Trials: Test No. 10557. (Unpublished study received Fab
18, 1977 under 100-583; prepared by Purdue Univ., Botany & Plant
Pathology Dept., submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro,
N.C.; CDL:223119-AR)
000004191 Willigan, D.A. (1977) Bifenox: Three-Generation Reproductive Study
in Charles River Albino Rats: Summary of Histopathological
Observations. (Unpublished study including letter dated Dec 12,
1977 from D.A. Willigan to Theodore Ellison, received Dec 21,
1977 under 2224-50; prepared by Donald A. Wiliigan, Inc., sub-
mitted by Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond,
Va.; CDL:232516-A)
005005104 Wilson, H.P.; Hines, T.E. (1974) Activities of bifenox and 11-22234
in com. Pages 7-12, _In Proceedings of the itortheastern iJeed
Science Society. Vol. 28. Painter, Va.: Virginia Truck and
Ornamentals Researcn Station.
000013336 Wilson, H.P.; Milbocker, D.C.; Hines, T.E. (1975) Soybeans—1975:
Preplant Incorporated, Prcemergence and Postemergencc Combina-
tions; Test No. 10464. (Unpublished study received Sep 13, 1977
under 100-523; prepared by Virginia Truck and Ornamentals Re-
search Station, Virginia Beach Branch and Eastern Shore Branch,
Dept. of Plant Physiology, submitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp.,
Greensboro, N.C.; CDL.-231563-C)
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to be Inappropratc for
Use in Developing This Standard
LIKID CITATION
000003373 v/ilson, H.P.; Milbocker, D.C.; llinos, T.E. (1975) ly75 vfeecl Science
Rescarcn Summary. (Unpublishc-d study received Dec 12, 1975 un-
der unknown admin, no.; prepared by Virginia Truck and Ornamen-
tals Research Station, Virginia Beach Branch and Eastern Shore
Branch, Dept. of Plant Physiology, submitted by Mobil Chanical
Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:223556-G)
000016110 Wilson, H.P.; Milbocker, B.C.; Hin«s, T.E. (1975) 1975 Weed Science
Research Suimary: Test Mo. 10464. (Incomplete study; unpub-
lished study received Jan 19, 1977 under 100-533; prepared by
Virginia Truck .and Ornamentals Research Station, Virginia Seacn
Branch and Eastern Shore Branch, Dept. of Plant Physiology, sub-
mitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL.-095751.-R)
005013333 Wiltrout, T.R.; Holt, H.A. (1975) Prospects of controlling
vegetation in new forest plantations. Pages
31-36, In. Proceedings of the North Central vfeoci Control
Conference. Vol. 30. Lincoln, Nebr.: North Central '.feed
Control Conference.
000003493 vforsnam, A.D.; Saunders, E. (1975) Preliminary Evaluation of Bife-
nox Formulations Preemergence on Corn, Clayton, NC. (Unpub-
lished study received Mar 9, 1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by
North Carolina,. State Un?.v., Crop Science Dept., submitted, by
Mobil Chemical Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:
228701-R)
000019047 vvu, C.; Santelmann, P.W. (1973) Pre-plant Incorporated, Preemer-
gence weed Control in Cotton: Test No. Lib. ito. 10092. (Unpub-
lished study including submitting company summary, received Apr
29, 1976 under 100-523; prepared by Oklahoma State Univ.; sub-
mitted by Ciba-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, N.C.; CDL:225271-AN)
000004134 Wu, C.H.; Hill, L.; Santelmann, P.W. (1975) '.feed Control in Grain
Sorghum: Report No. C75-2. (Unpublisned study received Mar '},
1977 under 2224-EX-10; prepared by Oklahoma State Univ. [of
Agriculture and Applied Science], submitted by Mobil Chemical
Co., Industrial Chemicals, Richmond, Va.; CDL:223701-AE)
005014993 Yamada, T. (1976) Dipnenyl ether kei josozai no dojochu ni okcru
•Jotai. [Dynamics of diphenyl ether derived herbicides in
soil.] Shokubutsu Boeki. [Plant Protection.] 30(8):312-317.
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Citations Judged to bo Inapproprate for
Use in Developing This Standard
ilRID CITATION
005004451 Ych, H.J.; Benrcns, R. (1974) Factors causing bifcnox injury to
com. Pages 13U, _In Proceedings—North Central Weed Control
Conference. Vol. 29. Lincoln, Nebr.: t torch Central Vfced
Control Conference.
-------
OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS
REGISTRATION STANDARD BIBLIOGRAPHY
Section 3: Standard Reference Material
Farm Chemical Handbook. (1979) Meister Publishing. Willoughby,
Ohio.
The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, as
amended in 1978, 7th U.S. Code, Chapter 135, 61 Statute
163.78 Statute 190.
Pesticide Process Encyclopedia, 1977, Noyes Data Corporation,
Park Ridge, New Jersey.
Pesticide Index: Basic Information on the Chemicals Used as
Active Components of Pesticides.; Martin, H., and
Worthington, C.R., eds., 1977.5th ed., British
Corporate Protection Council, Worcestershire, England.
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (1978a); Proposed
Guidelines for Registering Pesticides in the United
States. Federal Register. 43 (132) 29696.
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (1978b); Proposed
Guidelines for Registering Pesticides in the United
States; Hazard Evaluation: Humans and Domestic Animals.
Federal Register, 43 (163) 37336.
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency- (1980); Regualt.ions
for the Enforcement of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,
and Rodenticide Act, Title 40, Chapter 1, Part 162.
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (in press) Proposed
Guidelines for Registering Pesticides in the United
States. Subparts G (Product Performance) and H (Label
Development).
------- |