&EPA
             United States
             Environmental Protection
             Agency
             Hearth Effects Research
             Laboratory
             Research Triangle Park NC 27711
EPA-600/1-78-055
August 1978
             Research and Development
Epidemiologic  Study
of the  Effects  of
Automobile Traffic
on Blood  Lead  Levels

-------
                RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES

Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, have been grouped into nine series. These nine broad cate-
gories were established to facilitate further development and application of en-
vironmental technology.  Elimination of traditional grouping  was  consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields.
The nine series are:

      1.  Environmental  Health Effects Research
      2.  Environmental  Protection Technology
      3.  Ecological Research
      4.  Environmental  Monitoring
      5.  Socioeconomic Environmental  Studies
      6.  Scientific and Technical Assessment Reports (STAR)
      7.  Interagency Energy-Environment Research and Development
      8.  "Special" Reports
      9.  Miscellaneous Reports
This report has been assigned to the ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH EFFECTS RE-
SEARCH series. This series describes projects and studies relating to the toler-
ances of man for unhealthful substances or conditions. This work is generally
assessed from a medical viewpoint, including physiological or psychological
studies. In addition to toxicology and other medical specialities, study areas in-
clude biomedical instrumentation and health research techniques utilizing ani-
mals — but always with intended application to human health measures.
 This document is available to the public through the National Technical Informa-
 tion Service,  Springfield, Virginia 22161.

-------
                                   EPA-600/1-78-055
                                   August 1978
EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF AUTOMOBILE

          TRAFFIC ON BLOOD LEAD LEVELS
                        by

  D. E. Johnson, R. J. Prevost, J. B. Tillery,
        K. T. Kimball and J. M. Hosenfeld
          Southwest Research Institute
                3600 Yoakum Blvd.
              Houston, Texas 77006
             Contract No. 68-02-2227
                 Project Officer

                 Warren A. Galke
           Population Studies Division
       Health Effects Research Laboratory
       Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
      U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
       OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
       HEALTH EFFECTS RESEARCH LABORATORY
       RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, N.C. 27711

-------
                         DISCLAIMER
   This report has been reviewed by the Health Effects
Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
and approved for publication.  Approval does not signify
that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies
of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, nor does
mention of trade names or commercial products constitute
endorsement or recommendation for use.
                              11

-------
                            FOREWORD

     The many benefits of our modern, developing, industrial
society are accompanied by certain hazards.  Careful assessment
of the relative risk of existing and new man-made environmental
hazards is necessary for the establishment of sound regulatory
policy.  These regulations serve to enhance the quality of our
environment in order to promote the public health and welfare and
the productive capacity of our Nation's population.

     The Health Effects Research Laboratory, Research Triangle
Park, conducts a coordinated environmental health research
program in toxicology, epidemiology, and clinical studies using
human volunteer subjects.  These studies address problems in air
pollution, non-ionizing radiation, environmental carcinogenesis
and the toxicology of pesticides as well as other chemical
pollutants.  The Laboratory participates in the development and
revision of air quality criteria documents on pollutants for
which national ambient air quality standards exist or are proposed,
provides the data for registration of new pesticides or proposed
suspension of those already in use, conducts research on hazardous
and toxic materials, and is preparing the health basis for non-
ionizing radiation standards.  Direct support to the regulatory
function of the Agency is provided in the form of expert testimony
and preparation of affidavits as well as expert advice to the
Administrator to assure the adequacy of health care and surveillance
of persons having suffered imminent and substantial endangerment
of their health.

     Lead, because of its variety of uses and its toxicity,
has been a pollutant of much concern.  The present study is an
attempt to investigate the impact of automotive lead emissions
on the amount of lead in the body of persons living along
streets with typical urban traffic volume.  The blood lead
levels of persons of different ages have been investigated in
relationship to traffic volumes of up to about 30,000 vehicles
per day.
                              F. G. Hueter, Ph. D.
                                Acting Director,
                      Health Effects Research Laboratory
                                111

-------
                         ABSTRACT
      The objective of this research project was to character-
ize the.  absorption of lead by people of different age-sex
groups exposed to automobile emissions of lead at traffic
densities from less than 1000 cars per day to 25,000 cars
per day.  The relationships between traffic densities and
lead content of various environmental and household samples
were also examined.  Participant selection was based upon
a strict set of criteria which eliminated anyone whose
blood-lead level was affected by exposure to sources of non-food
lead other than automobile emissions.
      The degree of absorption by the participants was de-
termined by measuring blood-lead concentrations and blood-
FEP levels.  Blood CO levels were also measured.  A micro-
analytical technique was developed to accurately measure
blood-lead at concentrations less than 30 yg/100 ml in
100 yl capillary blood samples from children.  Also, hand-
wipe samples from children were analyzed for lead.
      The relationships between blood lead, handwipe lead
and blood CO levels of participants of different age-sex
groups and different traffic densities were examined.  No
significant relationships with traffic densities were found
in the range of exposures studied.
      Selected household samples were also measured for lead
content to eliminate them as possible sources of lead for the
participants and to examine the relationship of their lead
concentration to traffic densities.  Household samples in-
vestigated included  water from resident's kitchen tap, paint
from the interior and exterior surfaces of the residences,
28-day indoor dust samples, and window sill wipe samples.
                            IV

-------
Water was eliminated as a significant source of lead ingestion
and there were no relationships between any household samples'
lead content and traffic densities.
     Outside environment a], samples were also analyzed for
lead.  These included sell from participant residences,
outdoor dust from selected sites in the study area, and
air particulate matter from streets of different traffic
densities where participants lived.  Traffic counts were
also made on these streets to determine traffic densities.
Physical and chemica] properties of the soil samples were
also determined.
     Increased soil lead concentrations were observed with
increasing traffic density.  Physical and chemical charac-
teristics cf the soil in the study area favor lead retention
in the soil matrix.  Lead in air was found to be related to
increasing traffic density although the slope of the regression
line was not steep.
     A positive relationship between smoking and blood lead
levels was found for both females and males in this study.
Females who smoke had significantly higher blood lead levels
than female exsmokers and nonsmokers.  Male smokers and
exsmokers had higher blood lead levels than nonsmokers,
although this difference was not significant.
                              v

-------
                   TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                      Page

I.    Introduction                                      1

II.   Methods                                          14

      A.    Site Selection                             14

            1.    General Site Requirements            14
            2.    Study sites considered               15
            3.    Description of final study site      18
                        selected
            4.    Authorization of study by local      22
                        governments

      B.    Project Staff                              25

            1.    Overall project                      25
            2.    Field operations                     28

      C.    Determination of the relationship          35
                  between air lead levels and
                  traffic flow characteristics

            1.    Design                               35
            2.    Sample collection                    48
            3.    Sample analysis and quality          55
                        control procedures

      D.    Determination of the relationship          65
                  between blood lead levels
                  and traffic density

            1.    Description of study                 65
            2.    Data collection procedures           67
            3.    Sample analysis procedures           88
            4.    Statistical procedures              122
            5.    Participant recruitment             125

III.   Results                                         138

      A.    Determination of the Relationship         138
                  between Air Lead Levels and
                  Traffic Flow Characteristics
                            VI

-------
                                                      Paqe
            1.    Results of traffic density           138
                        mini-study
            2.    Results of replicate hi-vol          141
                        mini-study
            3.    Results of particle size             144
                        mini-study
            4.    Results of distance from street      149
                        mini-study
            5.    Results of intersections             150
                        mini-study
            6.    Results of speed limit               158
                        mini-study
            7.    Results of indoor vs outdoor         160
                        air lead mini-study
            8.    Results of indoor vs outdoor         164
                        dustfall mini-study
            9-    Results of collection times less     166
                        than 24 hours mini-study

      B.    Determination of the Relationship          170
                  between Blood Lead Levels and
                  Traffic Density

            1-    Results of recruitment activities    170
            2.    Description of study participants    182
            3.    Environmental data                   184
            4.    Biological data                      201
            5.    Multivariate analysis                239

IV.   Discussion                                       241

      A.    Air Monitoring Study                       241

      B.    EpidemiologicStudy of Traffic Density      249
                  Relative to Levels of Lead in the
                  Environment and Blood of Residents

V.    Conclusions                                      253

VI.   Recommendations                                  256

References                                             258

Appendix A  Justification for Change of Study Site     262
            to Dallas

Appendix B  Letters of Permission to Proceed from      270
            Local Governments

Appendix C  Justification for Household Health Survey  282
            for Lead
                         Vll

-------
                                                      Page
Appendix D  Air Lead Concentrations & Corresponding    292
            Traffic Counts

Appendix E  Variables Tap Water Lead, Soil Lead,       297
            Indoor Dust Lead, Windowsill Wipe
            Lead and Traffic for each Household

Appendix F  Variables for Hand-wipe Lead, Blood        305
            Lead, and Traffic Counts for each
            Participant (Children only)

Appendix G  Variables pertaining to Identification     309
            of the Participant and Blood Analyses

Appendix H  Fingerprick Samples 1 & 2 for each         325
            Participant

Appendix I  Paint Lead Concentration, Distance from    328
            Street, and Composition of each
            Household

Appendix J  Report to Southwest Research Institute     335
            by Geoderma Consultants - Dallas, Texas
                         Vlll

-------
                       LIST OF TABLES
                                                         Page
 1.    Analytical Parameters of Environmental             56
       Samples

 2.    Analytical Parameters for Atomic Absorp-           61
       tion Spectrophotometric Lead Analysis

 3.    Analytical Parameters of Environmental             93
       Samples

 4.    Effect of Refrigeration on Blood Lead             102
       Values of Whole Blood (CDC) Bovine Blood

 5.    Analytical Parameters of Biological               104
       Samples

 6.    Determining Blood Volume in Capillary             112
       Tube by Indirect Measurement

 7.    CDC Bovine Blood as Quality Control for           113
       Capillary Blood Lead Analysis

 8.    Sample Opinion Survey re Air Pollution            134
       Concern

 9.    Mean Air Lead Concentrations and Traffic          138
       Counts at Each Location and Traffic Density

10.    Lead Concentration in Five Particle Size          145
       Ranges at Four Distances from the Street

11.    Lead Concentration and Proportion in Five         147
       Particle Size Ranges at Four Distances
       from the Street

12.    Concentration of Lead Suspended in Air at         148
       Increasing Distances Expressed at as Percent
       of Lead at Five Feet from the Street

13.    Concentration of Lead Suspended in Air at         150
       Four Distances from the Street for Two Days
       at Three Traffic Densities

14.    Intersection Study: Air Lead Concentration at     155
       Intersections and Midblock Locations

15.    Corner Home Study:  Air Lead Concentration at     156
       Intersections and Midblock Locations
                              IX

-------
                  LIST OF TABLES CONT'D
                                                        Page

 16.    Air  Lead  Concentrations at Two Speed Limits       158

 17.    Outdoor Dustfall Lead Concentrations from         164
       Ten  Locations with Corresponding Indoor
       Dustfall  Lead Concentrations and Traffic
       Counts

 18.    Collection Times Less Than 24 Hours: Air Lead     167
       Concentrations  and Traffic Counts  for  Five
       Collection Times at Three Traffic  Densities

 19.    Recruitment Results                               I"72

 20.    Number of Participants by Age, Sex, and           176
       Traffic Level

 21.    Number of Participating Households at             187
       Intersections

 22.    Participant Demographic Characteristics-          183

 23.    Test  for  Differences Among Sites in Tap           191
       Water Using Kruskal-Wallis Test

 24.    Paint Lead Concentration: Means, Standard         208
       Errors and Sample Sizes for  Indoor and
       Outdoor Paint Lead at Each Traffic Density

 25.    Results of Test for Extreme  Values (Dixon's       212
       B-^ Test)  on Blood Samples for Participants
       Potentially Exposed to other Lead  Sources

 26.    Two-Way ANOVA of the Effects of Sites  and         213
       Samples on Log  (Blood Lead)  for Each
       Age-Sex Group

 27.    Blood Lead Concentrations: Means,  Confidence      214
       Limits, and Sample Sizes for Each  Age-Sex
       Group at  Each Site

 28.   Two-Way ANOVA of the Effects of Sex and Age       217
      on Log (Blood Lead)  at Sites 1,2,3 and 4
      and All-Sites

29.   FEP for Each Age-Sex Group at Each Site           223

30.   HCT for each Hematocrits  for Each Age-Sex         224
      Group at Each  Site
                            x

-------
                  LIST OF TABLES CONT'D
                                                      Page

31.    Variables and Regression Coefficients            230
      Used in Least Squares Regression Analysis

32.    Simple Correlation Coefficients among All        231
      Variables for Children (above) and Adults
      (below)

33.    Correlations with the 25 Independent Variables   235
      of the Six Principal Component Factors that
      Contribute Most to R2 (Data from Children Only)

34.    Correlations with the 25 Independent Variables   238
      of the Six Principal Component Factors that
      Contribute Most to R2 (Data from Adults Only)
                               XI

-------
                         LIST OF FIGURES

                                                        Page

  1.     Traffic Artery Map  of Dallas  Metro  Area          20

  2.     Principal Study Areas within  the  Dallas          23
              Metro Area

  3.     Qualifications for  On-Site  Coordinator           29
              and Sample Task Descriptions

  4.     Dallas Traffic Lead Study Instructions           31
              for Performing Household  Surveys

  5.     General Criteria for Placement  of High           36
              Volume Particulate Sampler

  6.     Placement of Samplers for Distance  from          39
              Road Mini-study

  7.     Placement of Samplers for Intersection           41
              Mini-study

  8.     City of Dallas,  Western  Section                  44

  9.     City of Dallas,  North Central Section            45

 10.     City of Arlington                                46

 11.     Placement of Samplers for Collection  Times        47
              Less Than  24  Hours Mini-study

 12.     Air  Sampling and Traffic Counting                53

 13.     Apparatus  for the Acid Digestion  of              60
              Air,  Windowsill Wipe, and Hand-Wipe
              Samples

14.    Analytical  Curve  for  Lead in  Air  Particulate      63

15.    Analytical  Curve  for  Lead in  Outdoor  Dust         64

16.    Traffic  Lead  Household Questionnaire              68-69

17.    Traffic  Lead  Individual  Questionnaire             70-71

18.    Neighborhood  Lead Study  - Participants and        72
             Household Checklist

-------
                  LIST OF FIGURES  CONT'D

                                                      Page


19.   Household Validation Form                        83

20.   Traffic Lead Validation                          34

21.   Analytical Curve for Lead in Soil                92

22.   Analytical Curve for Lead in Water               94

23.   Analytical Curve for Lead in Indoor Dust         95

24.   Analytical Curve for Lead in Windowsill          97
            Wipes

25.   X-ray Fluorescence Analyzer - Rhenium            98
            Filter-Calibration Curve

26.   X-ray Fluorescence Analyzer - Lead Filter-       99
            Calibration Curve

27.   Analytical Curve for Lead in Hand-wipes          101

28.   Analytical Curve for Lead in Venous Blood        107

29.   Analytical Curve for Lead in Capillary Blood     116

30.   General Information for Participants of          127
            Traffic Lead Public Health Survey

31.   Letter of Introduction                           133

32.   Volunteer's Informed Consent                     136-137

33.   Air Lead Levels by Traffic Count                 139

34.   Frequency Distribution of the Variable Air       140
            Lead

35.   Replicate Air Samples                            142

36.   Proportion of Total Lead Found in each           146
            Particle Size Fraction vs Distance
            from Street

37.   Air Lead vs Distance from Street                 148

38.   Air Lead Concentrations as a Function of Distance 151
            from Road and Traffic Density
                           Kill

-------
                  LIST OF FIGURES CONT'D
 39.    Intersection  Study:   Air  Lead Levels  at          153
             Intersection and  Midblock Locations

 40.    Corner Home Study:   Air Lead  Levels at           157
             Midblock  and Intersection Locations

 41.    Air Lead Concentrations vs  Two Speed  Limits      160

 42.    Indoor vs Outdoor  Air Lead  Concentrations        162
             at Two  Traffic Locations

 43.    Lead in Dust  (Indoor and  Outdoor)  vs              165
             Traffic Density

 44.    Indoor vs Outdoor  Dust  Lead Concentrations       166
             at Nine Matched. Locations

 45.    Air Lead Levels vs Traffic  Density for Four      169
             Collection Times  at Three Traffic Levels

 46.    Frequency Distribution  of Soil Lead               185

 47.    Frequency Distribution  of Soil Lead at           185
             Each Traffic Density

 48.    Soil Lead vs  Traffic Density                      186

 49-    Frequency Distribution  of Tap Water Lead         190

 50.    Frequency Distribution  of Tap Water Lead         191
             at  Each Traffic Density

 51.    Tap  Water Lead  vs  Traffic Density                 192

 52.    Frequency Distribution  of Indoor Dust Lead       193

 53.    Frequency Distribution  of Indoor Dust Lead       194
             at  Each Traffic Density

 54-    Indoor Dust Lead vs.  Traffic  Density              195

55.   Frequency  Distribution  of Windowsill  Wipe Lead   196

56.   Frequency  Distribution  of Windowsill  Wipe        196
            Lead at Each Traffic  Density
                            xiv

-------
                  LIST OF FIGURES CONT'D

                                                      Page


57.   Windowsill Wipe Lead vs Traffic Density          197

58.   Frequency Distribution of Hand-wipe Lead         199

59.   Frequency Distribution of Hand-wipe Lead         200
            at Each Traffic Density

60,   Hand-wipe Lead vs. Traffic Density               201

61.   Venous Blood Lead vs Capillary Blood Lead "       203
            Samples from the Same Participants

62.   Frequency Distribution of Mean Blood Lead        205

63.   Frequency Distribution of Mean Blood Lead        205
            for Each Age and Sex Group

64.   Frequency Distribution of Mean Blood Lead        206
            at Each Traffic Density

65.   Paint Lead vs Traffic Density                    209

66.   Frequency Distribution of Mean Blood Lead        210
            Levels of Participants Exposed to
            Paint Lead Below and Above 4.0
            mg/cm2 in their Homes

67.   Blood Lead Levels vs Traffic Density for         215
            Each Age and Sex Group

68.   Frequency Distribution of FEP                    219

69.   Frequency Distribution of FEP at Each            220
            Traffic Density

70.   Frequency Distribution of FEP for Each           221
            Age and Sex Group

71.   Frequency Distribution of HCT                    222

72.   Frequency Distribution of HCT at Each            222
            Traffic Density

73.   Frequency Distribution of HCT for Each           223
            Age and Sex Group

74.   Frequency Distribution of Carbon Monoxide        225
            in Blood
                           xv

-------
                  LIST OF FIGURES CONT'D

                                                      Page

75.   Frequency Distribution of the Variable Blood     227
      Lead in Three Smoking Groups of Adult Females
      and the Results of ANOVA among these Groups

76.   Frequency Distribution of the Variable Blood     228
      Lead in Three Smoking Groups of Adult Males
      tne the Results of ANOVA among these Groups
                           xvi

-------
                    I.  INTRODUCTION






MOBILE EMISSIONS




      Review of Related Lead Studies




      Contributions of lead from various sources in the




environment (air, water, soil, house dust, food) to accumu-




lations in people have been the subject of many scientific




investigations.  These have been well summarized in the Envir-




onmental Protection Agency's air quality criteria document




for lead, now in its third draft^).  The investigation




reported herein is centered on the contribution of lead to




populations from ambient air sources, primarily from auto-




mobile emissions; accordingly, discussion of the literature




in this report will be restricted to these subjects.




      Approximately 88 percent of the total atmospheric




emissions of lead in 1975 were from automobile use with




the remainder coming from lead-using industries primarily




smelters.  There has been concern regarding the contri-




bution of lead from mobile sources to the levels of lead in




people, especially those people living near heavily traveled




roads.  Lead originates from automotive sources via the




burning of gasoline which contains tetraalkyl lead as




an antiknock agent.  The quantity of lead utilized

-------
in the United States has  decreased  somehwat  during  the  last  several
years due to reduced gasoline  lead  content and  to the introduction of
the catalytic converter which  requires  nonleaded fuel.

       In a  previous  program conducted  by Southwest Research
 Institute(2),  it was shown that traffic policemen  and  parking
 garage attendants had elevated blood leads  levels  as compared
 with control groups  of participants.   The blood lead levels
 were as follows:  traffic policemen -  23.1  yg  per  100  ml
 as  compared to their controls - 18.4 yg; and parking garage
 attendants  28.3 yg  per 100 ml as compared to their controls -
 21.3 yg.  The elevations in blood  lead were attributed to
 exposure to lead primarily from mobile emissions.  The control
 groups of participants were selected to match  as closely
 as  possible the positive group of  participants for age, sex,
 smoking habits, and socioeconomic  parameters.  In general,
 the study participants did match  closely  regarding these
 parameters;  however, the traffic  policemen  tended  to have
 less eduation than  their controls  and  the parking  garage
 attendants  were slightly younger  than  their controls.  A
 second portion of the study involved adult  females living
 near freeways and a control group  of adult  females living
 away from freeways.   The results  showed no  significant dif-
 ferences  in  the blood lead of the  two  female populations,
 the  values being 12.9  (near freeways)  as compared  with
11.9 yg per  100 ml.   Blood lead values for  males were  con-
sistently higher than  for females and black participants

-------
tended to have higher blood leads than did white partici-




pants.  Air lead measurements were not performed as a part




of this study.




      Galke, et al.  (^)determined the blood levels of lead




in 187 children, age one to five years living in Charleston,




South Carolina. The relationship of lead in soil, paint




and air  was examined with regards to traffic densities




and levels of lead in the blood of the children. It was




found that the arithmetic mean blood lead level was related




to both the lead in soil and automobile traffic.




      Caprio, et al.(4) examined blood lead levels of children




relative to how close they lived to a major traffic artery.




The study, reported in 1974, included some 5,226




children living in Newark, New Jersey.  Over 57 percent




of the children living within 100 feet of a roadway had




blood levels in excess of 40 tag per 100 ml.  Lower levels




of lead were seen for those children living further away




from major roadways.  The authors concluded that residential




proximity to high traffic densities can contribute substan-




tially to lead absorption in children.  Their findings indicated




that residential areas located immediately adjacent to an




urban highway exhibited higher rates of excessive blood




lead absorption in children than did households beyond 200 feet




from the street.  This study did not consider lead from other




sources.   Other studies of the contribution of mobile emissions to




blood leads indicate that these higher blood lead values are not

-------
usually seen as a result of lead from automobile emissions




alone.  Contribution of lead from sources such as lead in




paint might have been involved in this investigation.




      Daines, et al,  ^ ' studied black females living near



a heavily trafficked highway in New Jersey.  The study popula-



tion in this investigation lived in houses on streets paral-




leling a major highway at three distances from it.  Air




lead levels were measured as were blood lead values. Mean




annual air lead concentrations ranged from 4.6 yg per cubic




meter to 2.24 yg per cubic meter from the closest to the




furthermost distances.  Mean blood lead levels of the three




study groups of women in order of increasing distances from




the freeway were 23.1, 17.4, and 17.6 yg per 100 ml.  Measure-




ment of lead was also performed in the air inside and outside




of the homes, in those homes with and without air conditioning,




and during times of winter and summer.  The results showed




levels of lead indoors were reduced approximately 50 percent




in the wintertime when the windows were closed.  Approximately




the same percentage reduction in lead from outside to inside




air was seen in homes with air conditioning units operated




during the summertime.  It was noted that the quality of




the air conditioners utilized in these homes was poor.




      Thomas, et al.(6) examined blood lead levels in 50




adults who lived at least three years within 250 feet of



a major freeway in Los Angeles as compared with 50 other



participants who had lived for similar periods near the

-------
Pacific Ocean.  The participants living close to the Pacific


Ocean in this particular area were upwind  (prevailing wind)


of significant mobile emissions.  Thomas et al.  reported


mean blood levels of 22.7 yg/lOOml for males and 16.7 yg/lOOml


for females while their controls were 16.0 yg per 100 ml


for men and 9.9 yg per 100ml for women.  The results show


significantly higher levels of lead in the population living


near the freeway as compared with their control groups of


participants.  The authors concluded that the differences


observed were consistent with coastal-inland atmospheric


and blood lead gradients in the Los Angeles basin and that


the effect of residential proximity to a freeway was not


demonstrated.  The results seen in this paper do not support


the conclusion of the authors.


      Waldron  (7) reported on the mean blood lead levels of


41 males and 51 females living within 800 meters of a highway


interchange.  In this study, blood lead levels were measured


in these participants prior to the opening of the highway


interchange, and similar measurements were made following


the opening of the freeway-  The lead levels were 14.41


for males and 10.93 yg per 100ml for females during the


baseline period, 18.95 and 14.93 approximately one year


after interchange was open and two years after opening the


values were 23.73 and 19.21 yg/lOOml.

                    / Q \
      Jones, et al. v '  studied taxi drivers for blood lead


value using a calculation of the driver's relative lead

-------
 exposure as  a result of  the  night versus day  shift  and




 the total mileage  driven.  The mean blood  lead  for  the  50



 London taxi  drivers  was  28 yg per 100 ml.   These  authors




 found no statistically significant differences  in the blood




 lead levels  related  to their index of exposure.




       A study performed  in California by this laboratory




 examined the relationship of lead from  mobile sources present




 in two communities,  one  in Los Angeles  and the  other  in




 Lancaster (9,10,11)^  Tne study  area in Los Angeles was




 located on the downwind  side of  the San Diego Freeway  (traffic




 density of more than 200,000 cars per day)  and  the  second




 was in the city of Lancaster, California located  in a high




 desert area  with a population of approximately  50,000.




 The two areas were selected  to represent a relatively high




 and a relatively low area of exposure to mobile emissions.




 In each of the two areas, environmental measurements were




 made for lead in ambient air, soil and  tap water.  In ad-




 dition,  measurements of  lead in  paint of selected  res-




 idences  were made  in the Los Angeles area.  Participants




 from these two areas were examined for  lead in  blood, urine,




 hair  and feces.  Lead in ambient air in the Los Angeles




 site  averaged  6.3  yg per cubic meter while in the control




 area  (Lancaster),  the average was 0.6 yg per  cubic  meter.




Considerably higher  levels of lead in soil  were found in



the Los Angeles site  (1913.6 yg/g)  than in  Lancaster (66.9  yg/g)



There was also a sharp dropoff of soil lead values at  the

-------
Los Angeles site when samples were examined with regard to dis-


tances downwind of the San Diego Freeway out to 300 feet.  There


were no differences in levels of lead in tap water for these


sites.  There were no painted surfaces with high levels of lead


within residences in the Los Angeles study area.


      Participants from each of the two areas of study included


three primary age groups:  children, young adults and elderly


of both sexes.  Lead levels of the Los Angeles participants were


significantly higher than those of corresponding age and sex


groups of the Lancaster participants for blood, hair and urine.


Blood lead levels for all males and females were 19.3 and 14.2


yg/lOOml, respectively, in Los Angeles and were 11.8 and 9.6 yg/


100ml in Lancaster.  The lead levels in feces of the Los Angeles


participants were about the same or less than the average lead


concentration of the Lancaster participants.  Fecal lead measure-


ments have been shown to be useful indicators of the consumption


of lead in the diet.  This study indicated that the levels of


lead in the participants living near a significant source of


mobile emissions of lead had substantially higher levels of lead


in blood, urine and hair than did their control group of par-


ticipants.  It was also concluded that these differences were


the result of exposure to lead present in air.

           / 1 Q \
      Snee v    performed an analysis of nine epidemiology


studies on male and female adult populations, four epide-


miology studies of children, and four clinical studies of


adult humans.   He calculated the blood lead-air lead relation-


ship for adults and found it to be approximately 1:1.  He

-------
 stated that this  implies  an  exposure  to an additional one



 microgram of lead per  cubic  meter of  air  can result  in  an



 increase  of approximately 1  ug  lead per 100 ml  in blood.



 This  calculated relationship of air lead  values to blood



 lead  is extremely important  in  the establishment of  a standard



 for lead  in ambient  air.   Using similar calculations of



 the blood lead to air  lead relationship Bridbord (13) re-



 ported the ratio  of  air lead to blood lead was  approximately




 1:2 rather than the  1:1 calculated by Snee.



       In  the air  quality  criteria document for  lead, a  summary



 of the data on mobile  emissions states that automobiles



 produce sufficient emissions of lead  to increase air and



 nearby soil concentrations as well as to  increase blood



 lead  concentrations  of both  children  and  adults. The problem



 of accumulation of lead in these populations  is of greater



 importance when the  residences  are located within 100 feet



 of the roadway.t1)




       General Objective of this Research  Project




       This report describes  the results of an epidemiologic



 study  on  the impact  of automobile emissions on  blood lead



 levels of persons of similar socioeconomic status, resident



 in an  urbanized area.  The residents  to be studied were



 to live on streets with traffic densities that  vary  from



 less than  1,000 cars per  day to approximately 25,000 cars



per day.   Previous studies have examined  the impact on blood



lead levels of lead emissions from mobile sources for traffic

-------
densities up to 250,000 cars per day.  Unlike the above-mentioned



studies, this one examined neighborhoods which probably



represent a major portion of the population in the United



States, that is, residents who live on streets with traffic



densities between 1,000 cars per day and 25,000 cars per



day.  The general objective was to evaluate the contribution



of airborne sources of lead, primarily from automobile emissions,



to the environments near roadways and the contribution of



this source of lead to residents living nearby.  The data



from this study should help to contribute to the body of



knowledge necessary for the Environmental Protection Agency



to assess the types of control measures needed, if any,



on avoiding possible health effects of exposed populations



in the United States.



      Specific Objectives



      The specific objectives of this study were to collect



the necessary data such that the following relationship



could be examined:



      1.    Traffic counts versus blood lead.



      2.    Traffic counts versus FEP levels.



      3.    Traffic counts versus ambient air lead levels.



      4.    Traffic counts versus soil lead.



      5.    Traffic counts versus house dust lead.




      6.    Traffic counts versus hand wipe lead.



      7.    Traffic counts versus windowsill wipe lead.

-------
      These relationships would be examined for traffic



 counts of 1,000 cars per day or less and up to approximately



 25,000 cars per day with multiple points in between.  In



 addition to these primary relationships, the following mini-




 studies were to be accomplished:



      1.    Determination of the effects of speed limits,



            intersections, and distances from roadway on




            correlation #3.



      2.    Determination of the quantities of lead present in



            different particle sizes as a function of distances



            from the roadway.



      General Description of Project



      This study was designed to minimize to the extent



 possible the confounding variables on  the contribution of



 mobile emissions of lead to  levels in  the environment and



 exposed populations.  A major metropolitan  area was selected



without significant sources  of air emissions of lead other



 than from mobile sources.  The site selected was Dallas,



Texas which does not have any significant sources of lead



other than two small stationary sources  (smelter and battery



manufacture)  present on the  south side of the city.  Study



areas were selected to avoid possible contribution of lead



from these two secondary sources.



      This investigation was composed of two primary components:
                             10

-------
      1.    Examination of the relationship between traffic
            density and the level of lead in associated ambient
            air.
      2.    Examination of the relationship of blood lead and
            other household lead levels with traffic densities
            on adjacent streets.
The two parts of the study were performed in the same general
area of north and northwest Dallas, Texas.
      1.  Ambient Air Lead Study
      The air sampling program was to be performed in several
locations within the same metropolitan area in which study
participants lived.  Air lead measurements were to be made
using high volume samplers with sufficient numbers of 24
hour samples collected to provide for an accurate assessment
of the air lead levels associated with different traffic
densities.  Mini-studies were conducted to examine the rela-
tionship of air lead values and traffic densities at varying
distances from the roadway, and for in block as well as
between block variation in air lead levels for the same
traffic densities.  Additional air samples were to be collected
to provide an estimation of indoor/ outdoor differences
of air lead levels at selected residences. The mini-studies
were also to include examination of various sizes of lead
containing particles as related to distances from roadways
                             11

-------
at selected traffic densities and evaluation of the effects
of speed limits on the relationship of ambient air lead
to traffic densities.
      2.    Exaininati£n__of_^ig_Relatjx>-nshlp Between
            TrafficDejisi.ty_and Household Lead_Levels_
            This part of the study was designed to examine
the relationship of traffic densities and the levels of
lead present in the immediate environment of selected
households, and blood lead and hand wipe lead level  in
household residents.  The study was designed such  that par-
ticipants from residential units only at the ground  level
and within 100 feet of the center  of the roadway would be
selected.  Additional restrictions included that the house-
hold would not be within  300  feet  of any crossing  roadway
or within 500 feet of a major roadway.   The study  partici-
pants to be selected were pre-school  age,  25 to 45 years,
and over 60 years of age.  For each age group,  the intent
was to  examine those participants  who  spent a major  portion
of their time at home.  Thus,  for  the middle age group,
the objective was to recruit  women that worked  at  home and
in the  elderly category,  those  individuals  both male and
female  that were retired  or had  jobs within their  home.
The program included the  development and design of a suitable
questionnaire for collecting  the necessary  demographic char-
acteristics of the study participants.  The information
                             12

-------
was to include not only age, sex, length of time of resi-




dence, smoking habits, but also whether or not they made



use of homemade or craft pottery for culinary purposes and



any history of occupational exposure to lead.



            For each of the households involved in this



study, measurements were to be made of the lead in house



dust and in the soil near the front stoop.  In addition,



measurements were to be made of the closest and most distant



point of the living space to the center of the roadway.



A traffic count would also be obtained near each residence.



Paint surfaces of the residences were to be screened for



lead content to preclude the involvement of leaded paint



as a possible source of lead for young children.



            All blood samples collected from the study par-



ticipants were to be analyzed for lead, free erthrocyte



protoporphyrin (FEP) and hematocrits.  Hand wipes were also



to be collected from each pre-school child for lead measure-



ments. The measurements for both lead and FEP were to be



made with a rigid quality control program to include some



duplicate analysis with the Center of Disease Control.



Additional environmental monitoring was to include measure-



ment of lead in paint, in windowsill wipes and in the




tap water of each residence.
                             13

-------
                      II.  METHODS




A.   Site Selection



     1.    General Site Requirements



           To accomplish the objectives of this  study, a



site was  required at which populations are  in residence



on urban streets having traffic densities in the range



of <1/000 to >25,000 cars per day.  The population  living



on the urban streets must include a spectrum of  ages  of



both sexes from preschool ages to over 60 years.   In  order



to minimize interferences from extraneous parameters, the



study was designed for middle economic class neighborhoods



which are primarily white in ethnic makeup.   Further, the



areas selected should exhibit a  low background in ambient



air lead levels and  in other identifiable  lead sources



 (such as drinking water).




           A most critical  ingredient for  site selection




was the presence of  sufficient members of populations living



on streets with higher traffic densities:  >15,000 cars per




day.  In many cases, perhaps the preponderance of cases,



urban streets with greater  than  15,000 cars  per  day become



commercialized and have  few or no residences directly on



the street front.  The following characteristics were con-



sidered in determining the appropriateness of each  proposed



study site:  ambient lead levels; the numbers of persons living



on streets with higher traffic densities; and the age, ethnic,



and economic structure of these streets and areas.
                           14

-------
     2.    Study Sites Considered

           Two metropolitan areas were considered as pos-

sible site locations for the study:  San Antonio and Dallas,

Texas.  Each of these cities has ambient air conditions

which are conducive to studying air lead from automotive

sources due to the lack of heavy, polluting industry. Traffic

densities and populations of both of the cities lead the

study team to estimate that both should be able to supply

the necessary populations-at-risk in the appropriate age,

race, sex, economic, and traffic-density mixes.  The specific

study design called for 480 white, middle economic class

participants living in residences on streets selected for

the study, with 120 participants at each of four separate

traffic density levels:

Traffic Density    Site           Number of
(1000 cars/day)  Designation      Participants
<1000
8-14
14-20
>20
Site
Site
Site
Site
1
2
3
4
120
120
120
120
           To meet the requirements of the study for 120

participants at each traffic density level, it was estimated

that a minimum of 200-300 candidate residences must be

identified for each traffic density site.  To qualify,

candidate residences must be single-family dwellings or
                          15

-------
duplexes which lie within 100 feet of the center of the




roadway but not within 100 yards of any traffic signal




or stop sign on the roadway and must be located only on




streets with 30-45 mph speed limits.  In addition, a




preference was indicated for houses which face the road-




way and not on the corner of an intersection with a




side street.



      It should be noted that, in the original study




design, inclusion of 5 traffic density levels was con-




sidered:  <1,000; 7,500-12,500; 12,500-17,500; 17,500-




22,500; >22,500 cars per day.  These study  design criteria




were submitted to the Office of Management  and Budget




(OMB) with the standard information regarding requests




for permission to use specific questionnaire forms.




The OMB indicated that the  design number of participants




(480) would be more properly applied to four rather than




five traffic density levels.  Thus, the study design




criteria were changed to the four site designations




listed.




      A preliminary siting  study was performed at




San Antonio to determine if that city could support




the study with adequate numbers of  residences qualified




for the study.  Census tract data from the  1970 census
                            16

-------
of population were used to determine areas of the city



which met the basic ethnic and economic design, i.e.,



areas predominently white, middle class.  From the



census data, areas indicating 70% or greater white,



non-Spanish residents were selected for on-site in-



spection.  The areas selected were then inspected by



driving through the potential neighborhoods and count-



ing candidate residences.  By direct inspection, the



candidate areas were judged to be acceptable or not



acceptable economically.  Those exhibiting the run-down



appearance of a poverty-level neighborhood or the



extremely affluent appearance of a well-to-do neigh-



borhood were omitted from further consideration.



            Due to the problems encountered in San



Antonio, a preliminary siting study was initiated in



Dallas to determine the possibility of that city



providing sufficient numbers of candidate residences,




particularly at the higher traffic densities: >15,000



cars per day.  Data from the 1970 census of the popu-



lation in that city were obtained and reviewed and data



regarding estimates of current traffic densities on




main thoroughfares were obtained through the traffic



department of that city. Candidate areas meeting ethnic
                            17

-------
and economic requirements (70% or greater white, non-



Spanish) were selected and on-site inspections were



conducted to determine the numbers of candidate



residences available on the thoroughfares with higher



traffic densities in these areas.  Results of the



preliminary siting study in Dallas indicated that more



than adequate numbers of residences would be available



in that city and its surrounding urbanized suburban



areas.



            Contacts were then made with the Institute



of Urban Studies at Southern Methodist University in



Dallas and preliminary arrangements were made for a



field office and an on-site coordinator for the study



based at that University.  The City of Dallas was con-



tacted and it was determined that the air pollution



control group and the traffic department of that city



were very interested in assisting SwRI to conduct a



traffic lead study.  Based on these findings, Dallas



was selected as the study site.  Pertinent data re-



garding justification for the change of site are



presented in Appendix A.




      3.    Description of the Study Site



            The general site selected for this study



is the Dallas Metropolitan Area, located in north central
                            18

-------
Texas.  The area has a mild, somewhat dry climate and



has sufficient population to support the study; 1.5



million persons reported in the 1970 census of the



population.  It is a highly industrialized and com-



mercialized area with little or no heavy polluting



industries.  The industrial-commercial makeup of the



area is typified by light and sophisticated industries



such as electronics, aircraft, merchandizing, and



financial institutions.  An abundance of heavily



trafficked, multi-lane thoroughfares exists in the



city, with residences located immediately along many



thoroughfares.  The traffic system in that city has



historically been designed around these multi-lane



thoroughfares and a network of such arteries exists



across all of the metropolitan area.  A map of the



metropolitan area showing the traffic artery system



is shown in Figure 1.



            For use in this study, a set of thorough-



fares was selected by use of data from the 1970 census



of the population and data regarding current estimated



traffic densities obtained from the traffic department




of the city.  At the outset, the study area was des-



igned to include major portions of the north central
                            19

-------
Figure 1,  Traffic Artery Map of the Dallas Metro Area.

-------
and northwest metropolitan areas, with some sections



in the southwestern portion of the metro area.  In-



cluded in the initial design area, in addition to the



City of Dallas, were portions of the cities of High-



land Park, University Park, Richardson, and Garland.



These cities are either surrounded by the greater city



of Dallas or are immediately adjacent to Dallas city



limits.  Review of the selected areas with City of



Dallas and with EPA Region VI personnel revealed the



location of a battery reclamation factory in the south



central portion of the city.  The plant was a known



emitter of particulate lead and its location was such



that a possible interference was established with the



potential study areas selected in the southwest por-



tion of the city.  The southwest area was eliminated



from use of the study because of potential contamina-



tion by the battery reclamation factory.



            The loss of the southwest area of Dallas



presented a handicap to the study efforts.  One street



in that area, Illinois Avenue, had been identified



to contain more than 140 residences on portions of



the thoroughfare with traffic densities greater than



20,000 cars per day.  The loss of Illinois Avenue
                          21

-------
required the expansion of the study area to include

the cities of Grand Prairie and Arlington and more

areas in the city of Dallas in the east central and

northeast.  Detailed on-site inspection were performed

for candidate streets in the added areas; a number of

residences qualifying for the study were counted and

a catalog was prepared showing numbers of residences

versus traffic counts for all candidate streets.  A

map showing the principal areas of the metro area

which served as study sites is shown in Figure 2.
      4.     Authorization of Study by Local
            Governments
            Officials of the local governments in each

municipality included in the siting analysis were then

contacted regarding their selection as candidate study

sites.  Included were:

            City of Dallas

                  Department of  Health

                  Department of  Consumer  Affairs

                  Department of  Environmental  Health
                        & Conservation

            Town of Highland Park

            City of University Park
                             22

-------
                                     Figure 2.  Principal Study Areas within the Dallas Mstro Area
NJ

-------
            City of Garland




            City of Richardson




            City of Grand Prairie




            City of Arlington




For each municipality,  a letter was prepared which




provided general information regarding the traffic-lead




study and requested permission for performing house-




hold surveys, recruiting volunteer participants, col-




lecting biological samples, and performing traffic counts.




Visits were made to each municipality requesting a




briefing and more detailed information regarding specifics




of the study were provided.




            Letters of permission to proceed were




received from each of the municipalities,  including




each of the three departments of the City  of Dallas.




A great deal of interest was indicated in  the results




of the study from a number of the communities and




copies of our documentation upon completion of the




study, were requested.   Letters of permission from each




of the communities are presented in Appendix B.
                           24

-------
B.    Project Staff

      1.    Overall  Project

            a.     Roles

                   Staffing of the project called for a

number of significant roles,  headed by the Project Man-

ager.  Organization  of these  roles is shown in a project

organization chart shown below.


Recruitment
Manager
Recruitment
Survey
Team




Biological
Manager
Biolc
and HOL
Samplin
Project
Manager






On-Site
Coordinator

1


Environmental
Manager


I
gical Environmental
isehold Sampling
g Team Team




Chemical
Analysis
Manager
Chem
labor
Tea
ical
atory
m

1
Data
Manager
1
Data
Entry
Personne
                              Traffic
                              Counting
                              Team
                   Project Organization Chart
                           25

-------
                 The Project Manager had total technical
and administrative responsibility for the conduct of the
study.
                 The Recruitment Manager was responsible
for development of survey materials, establishment of the
on-site-field office, and conduct of the household surveys.
The on-site coordinator and the Household Survey Team re-
ported directly to the Recruitment Manager during the survey
activity period.
                 The On-site Coordinator was responsible
for recruitment of the Survey Team, the Biological and
Household Sampling Team, and the Environmental Monitoring
Team, for management of the household survey activities,
and for coordinating activities during the biological and
environmental sampling period.
                 The Biological Manager had the overall
responsibility for the field sample collection operations.
His special duties were to direct the activities of the
biological collection teams in the collection and process-
ing of the biological and household samples.
                 The Environmental Manager had the responsi-
bility for directing the personnel involved in the air
sampling, traffic counting, paint analysis, and soil sampl-
ing operations.  The principal duties of the environmental
manager were to establish daily sites for the air samplers
                          26

-------
and to coordinate the traffic counting activities with the



city traffic department involved. These duties also included



the maintenance and repair of the air samplers and traffic



counters.  His activities in regard to the paint and soil



sampling involved monitoring the daily activities of the



personnel involved and to investigate any problems which



occurred in these areas.



                 The Chemical Analysis Manager was responsi-



ble for the laboratory analysis of all samples collected



and for the preparation of all data obtained from these



analyses for submission to data analysis.



                 The Data Manager was responsible for entry



of all data into computer processing format and for main-



tenance and analysis of the data obtained.



           b.    Personnel



                 With the exception of the On-site-coordinator,



Ms. Linda Johnson, a graduate student at Southern Methodist



University, all principal personnel involved in the study



are staff of the Department of Environmental Sciences, Divi-



sion of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Southwest Research




Institute.



                 The Project Manager and principal investigator




for the study reported herein was Dr. D. E. Johnson, Director,



Department of Environmental Sciences.



                 The remaining principal personnel are listed




as follows:
                            27

-------
        Role                     Personnel

Recruitment Manager         R. J. Prevost
                            Senior Research Analyst


Biological Manager
       and
Chemical Analyses Manager   J. B. Tillery
                            Senior Research Chemist

Environmental Manager       J. M. Hosenfeld
                            Research Scientist

Data Manager                K. T. Kimball
                            Research Statistician


     2.    Field Operations

           a.    Field Office

                 An on-site field office was established

on the campus of Southern Methodist University at the In-

stitute of Urban and Environmental Studies.  An arrangement

was made with the Director, Mr. Bennett Miller, for the

use of office space, telephones, and a graduate student

to serve as on-site-coordinator of study activities.  For

the purpose of recruitment of the on-site-coordinator and

for definition of the support required for the coordinator,

a qualifications list (Figure 3) was generated and provided

to the Institute for Urban and Environmental Studies.

                 A qualified student was located and es-

tablished as the on-site-coordinator for the study:  Ms.

Linda Johnson, a graduate student in public administration.

Throughout the remainder of study activities in Dallas,

Ms.  Johnson served as the principal coordinator of all

study activities in recruitment and field sampling and


                            28

-------
                                      Figure 3.
             Qualifications for On-Site Coordinator and Sample Task Descriptions


           1.  Title:        On-Site Coordinator

           2.  Availability:   20 Hours Per Week

           3.  Rate:        $5. 20 per hour   (including SMU overhead rate)

           4.  Duration:     3-6 months

           5.  Office Space to store printed materials

           6.  Telephone:    Available during normal work hours or receptionist/
                           secretary available to take messages for coordination
                           in absence of coordinator.

           7.  Transportation for Coordinator:  Must have car; reimbursed @ $. 15/mile

           8.  Sample Tasks:

                   a.  Making appointments
                   b.  Meeting with officials to coordinate study activities and to col-
                        lect information
                   c.  Picking up materials
                   d.  Delivery of materials
                   e.  Site surveying - counting residences in specific areas; streets
                        with specific traffic densities
                   f.   Locating and interviewing survey team of 10 members
                   g.  Help set up traffic counting equipment
                   h.  Help set up air sampling equipment
                   i.   Coordination of household survey of 1000 households
                   j.   Record traffic counts
                   k.  Collect filters from air sampling equipment
                   1.   Help collect soil,  dust,  and blood samples from selected
                        households.
served  as  the point of  contact with municipal  agencies

and  the general  public.

                       A  survey team was  recruited through SMU

and  through manpower  placement firms by the  on-site  coordi-

nator.   A  set of recruitment  and  training materials  was
                                    29

-------
prepared by the project team with the help of the coordi-



nator and a candidate team was assembled for training.



A set of instructions (Figure 4)  was distributed to the



survey team members and details of the study were explained.



The importance of recruitment of volunteers was stressed



in the training sessions.  Persons with previous experience



in survey work were selected, where possible, and detailed



instructions in the survey procedures to follow were pro-



vided in the training session.



                 Survey team members were hired through



the offices of SMU or through local temporary manpower firms.



No team members were hired directly by Southwest Research



Institute.  As an incentive, the survey workers were offered



payment based on the number of forms completed and delivered



to the coordinator.  Two separate stages of survey activities



were performed using these methods. In the first state,



the workers were offered $2.50 per household form completed,



and $2.00 per participant form completed.  A minimum of



$3.00 per hour worked up to 40 hours was established as



a minimum payment.  Most workers, however, were able to



better this figure substantially.  Because of difficulties



in recruitment of volunteers, the amount paid per completed



form was raised to $5.00 per participant form in the second



stage of survey activities.  Instruction materials used



in training survey workers during the second stage are shown
                           30

-------
 in Figure  4.
                                  FIGURE 4.
                   DALLAS TRAFFIC LEAD STUDY INSTRUCTIONS
                     FOR PERFORMING HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS
     Schedule of Activities

     Friday, May 21    Training Session
     Saturday, May 22   Survey Begins
     Tuesday, May 25   Turn in Completed Forms and Review Progress
     Thursday, May 27 - Turn in Completed Forms and Review Progress
     Saturday, May 29   Survey Complete
     Tuesday, June 1    All Forms must be turned in by this Date

     Rate of Pay

     $5. 00 per participant form completed
     $2. 50 per household form completed

     If not enough forms are completed to yield $3. 00 per hour worked,  then $3. 00
     per hour will  be paid.  However,  a good worker will be able to complete enough
     forms  to always make more than this minimum rate.

     Work Assignment

     You will be assigned approximately  60  residences by address, along one or more
     busy streets.  These residences have been carefully selected to meet certain re-
     quirements of the study.  The  work  assignment is designed to take a normal 40
     hour work week.  You should have no trouble completing the assignment in one
     week of work.  You may work  any hours and days which you choose.  Some  work-
     ers have better success on weekends.  You must complete the assignment and
     turn in all forms on or before  Tuesday, June 1.


     Early Completion

     If you complete your  assignment early,  so much the better.  You will be paid for
     the number of forms  delivered.  A goal should be to have all work completed by-
     Friday, May 29.  The sooner you complete your work, the sooner we can process
     the paper so you can  be paid.


                       Each survey  worker  was  provided  with  a

specific assignment  area  for  which he was  responsible.

Approximately  60  residences were  located  in  each  assignment,

and the  worker  was asked  to complete at least  50  household

forms within one  week.
                                    31

-------
           b.    Sample Collection



                 (1)   Biological Collection Team



                       (a)  Recruitment



                            The biological collection teams




were composed of two individuals.  One person was required



to be a laboratory technician with recent experience in



drawing blood from children.  The other team member was



not required to have any special technical skills but a



friendly attitude and outgoing personality were qualities



necessary for the job activities.  These people were all



hired through a temporary employment agency.  Some of the



laboratory technicians hired for this project were already



working in a clinic or hospital  (night shift or part .time)



specifically drawing blood from young children.  The other



technicians were not presently working at their profession



but had recently been so.  The longest time any laboratory



technician had been away from this type of work was 6 weeks.



All of the laboratory technicians were female and judged



mature enough to perform the required tasks without direct



supervision.




                            The second member of each



biological collection team was a young woman between 18 and




22 years old.  Most, if not all, were undergraduate students



at local universities.  These women were selected for this



project based upon their demonstrated maturity and personality.
                           32

-------
                       (b)  Training



                            The week prior to the actual



collection of samples, a training session for the biological



collection teams was held on the SMU campus.  The main purpose



of the training session was to familiarize the laboratory



technicians with the care necessary in taking blood samples



for Pb analysis. (14)  since contamination  (especially with




the finger-prick technique) is a major concern in the collec-



tion of blood samples for Pb analysis, special emphasis



was placed upon the modifications of the routine collection



procedures to minimize this problem.  Other points covered



during the training session included: (1) what information



was to be collected and how it was to be recorded, (2) how



and where to collect the household samples, (3) procedure



for taking handwipe samples from children, and, (4) procedures



to follow during medical emergencies.



                            It was necessary that at least



one team member have transportation available.  Time was



allotted during the training session for everyone to meet



and to pair off as teams such that the transportation problem



would be solved and there would not be any personality




conflicts between team members.



                 (2)   Environmental Sampling Team



                       (a)  Recruitment




                            Collection of environmental




samples required two individuals for the air sampling and
                           33

-------
traffic counting, one person for the paint analysis and



one person for the soil sampling.  No specific technical



Skill was required for these individuals but a steady job



record along with demonstrated maturity were essential




qualities necessary.



                       (b)   Training



                            Team members were trained in




the tasks they were to perform by the environmental manager.




For the most part, this consisted of on-the-job training



during the first week of field sampling.  The individuals



selected for these tasks were all male college students



between 20 and 24 years old.



                            The most difficult job assign-



ment, i.e., the task requiring some degree of technical



know-how was the operation of the portable x-ray analyzer



used to measure Pb content of paint in the participant's



homes.  The individual selected for this particular job



received several hours of instruction and observation with



the instrument before he was judged qualified to obtain



accurate data with the instrument.




                            Instruction, demonstration,



and observation by the environmental manager and soil chemist



(subcontractor)  were used to qualify the individual collecting



the soil samples.
                          34

-------
C.   Determination of the Relationship Between Air Lead
     Levels and Traffic Flow Characteristics

     1.    Design

           a.    General Outline

                 The determination of air lead levels and

traffic flow can be correlated using a variety of mini-

studies.  While each ministudy as described below was complete

in itself, their contribution to correlating the traffic

and air lead values should not be underestimated.

                 The basic study involved a continuous twenty-

five day sampling period during which traffic and air lead

values were recorded.  Streets with various traffic

densities were monitored that included rates of less than

1,000 vehicles/day; 5,000; 10,000; 15,000; 20,000; and

25,000+ vehicles/day.  Supplementing this basic study

was the determination of the effects of speed limits, inter-

sections and distances from the roadway.  How the particle

size varied as a function of distance from the roadway was

also examined.  Another ministudy determined the accuracy

of collection times less than 24 hours.  Studies were also

performed to compare indoor and outdoor lead values of

streets with 10,000 and 25,000 vehicles/day-  In contrast

to the above studies which used active collectors such as

high volume samplers, one ministudy used a passive collector

for settleable particulates.
                          35

-------
                        In defining the lead particulate

pattern  from highways, it was  important to eliminate  or

reduce as  many confounding variables as was practical and

so all of  the air samples collected in this study  had a

number of  common points between them.  Figure  5  illustrates

these common points.  With the exception of those  samples
           Figure 5.  General Criteria for Placement of High
                   Volume Particulate Sampler.


        >25,000 cars/day
<25,000 cars/day
                       >150m
                                    •HI VOL SAMPLER


                                        >90m
                              TRAFFIC
                              COUNTER
                                       15m
                               t
                              WIND
                             DIRECTION
                                                      I


taken for  the distance and  intersection studies,  all


samplers were placed in the middle of the block  and 15


meters  from the roadway.  The  samplers were approximately


1 meter above the ground on the same plane as  the roadway;


and unless the wind was parallel to the roadway,  the


samplers were placed on the downwind side.  The  selec-
                              36

-------
tion of sites for air sampling was also based on the cri-


teria of speed limit, i.e., between 30-45 mph, and distance

from another major roadway, i.e., no closer than 150 meters.

A major roadway for this study was defined as 25,000 cars/day


or more.  However, for those cross streets having less than

25,000 cars/day the minimum distance was 90 meters.  During

the period that the samplers were collecting particulates,

meteorology data was also being collected.  All sites chosen

for air lead sampling were distant from any other known

sources of lead. Sampling was performed only during periods

of dry weather and with the exception of the 25-day study,

only on weekdays.

           b.    Traffic Density Mini-study

                 During the time period that biochemical

monitoring of the participants took place, an in-depth

air sampling program was also performed.  Begun approxima-

tely one week before the biochemical monitoring, air samples


were collected at six different traffic densities for 25

days.  Traffic counts were conducted at each site where

air sampling occurred.  Streets in each of the following

traffic densities were monitored: 1,000; 5,000; 10,000;

15,000; 20,000; and 25,000 cars/day. Rather than sampling


at just one site for each traffic density, three streets

in each of the six densities were monitored.  The streets


were chosen in different sections of the city within the
                                                       f


                           37

-------
boundaries of the study area.  The angle of the street in



relation to the wind direction was also varied.  Because



of  this wind direction variation, a set of three streets



with  the same traffic density was not monitored at the same



time.  While the monitoring of the streets for a specific



traffic density was not purposefully randomized, the  task



of  locating streets as other streets were being sampled



created its own randomization.  Each of the three streets



studied for a given traffic density was monitored for 8



consecutive days plus an additional day at one site to meet



the 25-day sampling requirement.  Each street thus monitored



had at least one weekend of sampling.  Therefore, for the



entire 25-day study at each of the six traffic densities



having three streets each, a total of 150 air samples/



traffic counts were collected.



           c.    Replicate High Volume Ministudy



                 A large number of air samples were collected



throughout the air monitoring studies of this project.



These samples were collected using single high volume



samplers deployed in the various sampling schemes described



previously and also following this subsection.  Since single



samplers were used, it was important to determine the



accuracy and precision that any one sampler might exhibit.



A study was thus performed to determine these variables.
                           38

-------
                  Two high volume samplers  were placed about


one meter apart from one another.  These  samplers were


placed at one  of the locations sampled  during the twenty-


five day study and followed the common  point criteria men-


tioned above.   Simultaneous air sampling  using the same


two samplers took place for 10 consecutive days.  Traffic


counting was also performed during these  sampling runs.


            d.     Distance from Road Mini-study


                  Sites selected for this  study required an


area that was  unobstructed for a minimum  of 40m back


from the roadway on the downwind side.  (Figure 6).  Four


             Figure 6.  Distance from Road Mini-Study.
                           30m
                           15m-
                           7.6 m.
                           1.5 m.
                                          HI VOL SAMPLER
                                       TRAFFIC
                                      nCOUNTER
                                      ••TRAFFIC
                                       COUNTER
                           WIND
                         DIRECTION
                            39

-------
samplers were set up at 1.5, 7.6, 15 and 30m from the

roadway in the middle of the block.  A traffic count

was initiated and all samplers were turned on simultaneously.

Two 24-hour sampling periods were recorded for each of the

following traffic densities: 5,000, 15,000, and 25,000+

cars/day.

           e.    Particle Size as a Function of
                 Distance from Road Mini-study

                 These samples were collected at the same site

as the distance from the roadway study (25,000+cars/day

only).  An Andersen high-volume particle-sizing collection

head was used to collect and separate the particles.  This

collection device separated the particulates into five

aerodynamic size ranges, by particle diameter: 7 microns

or larger; 3.3 to 7 microns; 2 to 3.3 microns; 1.1 to 2.0

microns and 0.01 to 1.1 microns.  Samples were taken at

each of the four distances as mentioned in the distance

study using the Andersen sampling head.

           f.    Intersection Mini-study

                 Five different intersections with varying

traffic densities were studied.  These intersections were:

25,000 vs 10,000; 25,000 vs 5,000; 15,000 vs 1,000; 10,000

vs 5,000; and 10,000 vs 1,000 cars/day streets. Each of

these combinations was studied for four weekdays.  One

sampler was set up on the downwind corner 15 meters from
                           40

-------
both  roadways (Figure 7).  The second  sampler was set up


at mid-block on the principal roadway  and each roadway had


its own traffic counter.  With the  aid of radio communica-


tions,  the samplers were started simultaneously and the


traffic count taken.




         Figure 7.  Intersection Ministudy
                    TRAFFIC
                    COUNTER
                        HI VOL
                    15m"
                     15m
                             TRAFFIC
                            n COUNTER
                             WIND
                           DIRECTION
                                               HI VOL
                                              15m
                  With the addition of corner homes  to  the

study to increase the potential number of participants,  an

expanded intersection study was initiated.  This dealt with

the effect that  side  streets of less than 1,000 cars/day

had on the lead  levels of the principal street.  Samples were

set up on the corner  and midblock of the principal  street as


                               41

-------
described above and run for 24 hours.   At the end of this time



period the samplers were physically interchanged and the second




sample collected.  The samplers were switched to prevent



any inherent bias in the collection. Traffic counts also



were recorded on each street.  Samples were taken at in-



tersections of less than 1,000 cars/day vs 1,000; 8-14,000



vs 1,000; 14-20,000 vs 1,000; and 20,000+ vs 1,000 cars/day.



Only four-corner intersections having stop signs on the



side streets were selected.



           g.    Speed Limit Mini-study



                 Two streets were chosen that had



approximately the same number of cars per day.  However,



one street had a speed limit of 30 MPH while the other



had a 45  MPH speed limit.  Air samples and traffic counts



were collected at each site for five days.



           h.    Indoor vs. Outdoor Mini-study




                 Ten residences of participants selected



for biochemical monitoring were also selected for indoor



air sampling.  Five residences were chosen from a 25,000+



car/day street and five from 10,000 car/day street.  The



indoor sampler was usually placed in the living room. These



samplers were of the same type as used outside, although



the ones that were cleanest and with the best appearance



were placed inside the home.  If the homeowner objected



to the living room placement, then another room such as



a  bedroom was chosen that was the same distance from the
                           42

-------
roadway as the living room.  The second sampler was placed



outside of the home.  Each sampler was started simultaneously



and a sample collected for 10-12 hours during the daytime



(usually from 8-9 a.m. to 6-7 p.m.).  Flow rates for both



indoor and outdoor samplers were approximately 50 cubic feet



per minute.  Two days of sampling were conducted at each



of the selected residences.



            i.    Dustfall Mini-study



                  Ten locations were selected throughout



the study area to collect settleable particulates for 28



days.  The number of locations assigned to specific sectors



of the study area approximated the density of participants



anticipated for that sector.  Maps with the ten locations



are illustrated in Figures 8, 9, and 10.
                            43

-------
      CITY OF DALLAS
       WESTERN SECTION
SCALE: 1" = 0.6. MILES
      * * HIVOL SAMPLERS
      • =• DUSTFALL COLLECTORS
               8
 44

-------
       CITY OF  DALLAS
    NORTH CENTRAL SECTION
SCALE: 1" = 0.6 MILES
      * = HIVOL SAMPLERS
      • =DUSTFALLCOLLECTORS
         "igure  9
45

-------
    DALLAS FORT WORTH TURNPIKE
    CITY OF ARLINGTON

SCALE: V = 075 MILES
      • = DUSTFALL COLLECTOR

         Figure 1C
          46

-------
            j.     Collection Time Less Than
                  24  Hours Mini-study

                  Twenty-four samples were collected  under

the common  point  specifications described above  except  that

they were collected  for time intervals less than 24  hours.

Time intervals  of 1,  2, 4, 12 hours were used at traffic

densities of  10,000,  15,000 and 25,000 cars/day.   The col-

lection scheme  consisted of four samples placed  side by

side and equidistant from the roadway (Figure 11).   All

four samplers were started at the same time as was the
         Figure 11.  Collection Times Less than 24 Hours
                  Ministudy.
                      HI VOL SAMPLERS
                      1234
                      Fol [ol  fol [o\
                          t
                         15m
1


TRAFFIC
n COUNTER


                         WIND
                        DIRECTION
traffic counter,  usually between 8 and 9 A.M.  When  the  one

hour time interval  came up the traffic count was  noted  and

sampler 1 was turned off and the filter removed.  At  the

next time interval  of two hours, the cumulative traffic
                            47

-------
 count was  noted and sampler 2  was  turned off.   This  sequence



 continued  until the last collection was  terminated 12  hours



 later.   The  following  day,  the sequence  was  repeated at



 the same location.   Two  sampling days  were also performed



 at each of the  remaining two traffic densities.



      2.   Sample  Collection



           a.    Traffic Volume




                 A successful  traffic  counting  operation



 was vital  to the purpose of this contract.   To  insure  that



 accurate and meaningful  counts were obtained, coordination



 efforts were set up and  maintained  with  the  traffic  and



 safety offices  of  the  following governmental agencies



 located in the  State of  Texas:



                 City  of Arlington



                 City  of Dallas



                 City  of Garland



                 City  of Grand Prairie



                 City  of Highland Park



                 City  of Richardson



                 City  of  San Antonio




                 City  of  University Park




                 Texas Department of Highways



                 The purpose of the coordination efforts



was twofold.   The necessity of informing these different



agencies of the anticipated traffic counting operations
                           48

-------
that would be conducted in their jurisdictional areas is




obvious.  Permission to conduct the surveys was then



necessary before any type of activity cound be performed.



                 At this point, it should be mentioned



that the data gathered under this contract would not have



been possible without the excellent help and advice of the



governmental agencies listed above.  Instructions as to



the proper placement of the traffic counting devices, loan



of counting equipment, availability of previous traffic count



data, donations of detailed city maps, all of these items



contributed by the agencies listed above played an important



role.  Our gratitude to them is humbly offered.



                 Following contact with the various



cities on whose streets the counting would be performed,



a review of all published traffic count data was made to



identify potential streets and areas for the counting survey.



The streets were categorized based on their traffic count,



i.e., less than 1,000 cars per day; 5,000; 10,000; 15,000;



20,000; and 25,000 cars/day and above.  With the streets



thus pigeon-holed, a culling of the unacceptable streets



was based on availability of potential volunteer residences.



A visual on-site survey of the tentatively selected streets



was then made and the list of potential streets was further




refined.



                 The apparatus used for traffic counting




was mainly the Traficounter Junior  (Streeter Amet, Grayslake,

-------
Illinois) although others such as Models RCH and MR from



the same manufacturer were also used, but to a lesser extent.



The Traficounter Junior is a digital counter which records



axle count, while the MR and RCH counters print the axle



count hourly on a paper tape. Other than this output dif-



ference, the operation and set-up of all counters was the




same.



                 The streets for which traffic counting



was required were inspected to determine proper placement



of the counters.  Instructions received from the Texas



Highway  Department, training by the City of San Antonio,



and installation instructions from the equipment manufact-



urer provided the basis for traffic counter placement.



Basically, a minimum distance of 50 meters was required



from any cross street or intersection.  Both ends of the



road tube were attached to the pavement with concrete nails.



One end  of the tube was plugged and the other end was at-



tached to the counter.  A two-lane street was counted with



one road tube and one counter since the counter was capable



of an accurate count over both lanes even with the opposite



traffic  flow.  On the streets included in the study, there



were no  three-lane streets.  Four lanes of traffic required



two counters, one for each direction of travel and where



possible, the counters were placed on a center median and



the road tube was extended to the outside lanes.  The same
                            50

-------
set-up was used for 6 lanes of traffic with one counter



for each direction of travel.




                 After the road tubes were in place



and the counter turned on, a validation procedure was



begun.  For each counter, fifty cars were counted that



passed over the road tube.  This figure was compared with



the value of the mechanical counter.



                 On a two lane street with one lane of



traffic in each direction, occasionally two cars would



activate the road tube simultaneously.  The result was



that three axles were counted instead of four as occurred



when two cars crossed the road tube independently-  Similar



missed counts occurred when two or more lanes of traffic



were flowing in the same direction.  In this case when



two cars were traveling side by side and crossed the road



tube only two axles were counted instead of four.  A cor-



rection factor was developed for each traffic count that



would take into account these simultaneous crossings.  This



correction factor was based on the ratio of cars counted



mechanically versus the visual count.  The twenty-four hour



count was then increased to reflect this ratio.  A similar



correction factor was also developed for multi-axled vehicles



such as dump trucks or somi-trailer trucks. During the set



up of the traffic counter(s) on a street, a visual count



was made of multi-axled vehicles.  This count, which usually
                            51

-------
lasted for an hour was then applied to the final traffic



count in a manner similar to the simultaneous crossing



factor.  However, the truck factor decreased the total



mechanical count because while the total axle count in-



creases, only one vehicle passed over the road tube.  With



the exception of those streets over 15,000 vehicles/days,



the truck correction factor decreased the twenty-four hour



count on the average of 5 to 20 vehicles.  On streets above



15,000 vehicles/day, the total count decreased an average



of 15 to 35 vehicles.



                 At each location where traffic counting




was performed, a data sheet was completed (Figure 12).



The form had spaces for the counter machine number, set-up



time and count, removal time and count, day, date, visual



vs machine count, and a place for remarks.  The set-up and



removal time interval was maintained as close as possible



to twenty-four hours with a one-hour difference being the



exception.  In the majority of cases, the equipment per-



formed as it was designed.  However, occasional problems



included loose or broken road tubes, and tubes removed from



the counter by vandals.




           b.    Air Particulates




                 The collection of air samples for the



various studies described above was performed to define



the lead particulate patterns near streets with varying






                           52

-------
                             Figure 12.
                  AIR SAMPLING i TRAFFIC COUNTING
                           Dallas, Tuxas - 1976
                              Project 01-4a94
Street
Sec Uo
Direction
• No.
>I Sam ale r No .
Rotam eter (cfm)
Hour Dav Date
val
D
ige
volume of air sampled
Total X Calibratic
Factor
Traffic  Counter
Machine No .
             Counter Readings
                                       Hour
Day
                                                                   Date
Removal    	

Set Up      	

Total       	

Visual/Machine Count:
Axle factor:
             24 hour weekday total =
                                                   vehicles
Remarks:
                             53

-------
traffic densities.   For each air sample that was collected,
a traffic count was recorded for that same collection in-
terval.
                 The equipment used to collect the
air samples were high-volume particulate samplers of standard
design.  Equipment from three different manufacturers
 (Staplex, BGI and General Metal Works) was used on this study.
 All high-volume samples used in this study used the same flow
 rate,  50-60 cfm.  Basically, each consisted of a blower with an
 8" x 10" holder for the filter.  A weatherproof unit composed of
 wood or aluminum, depending on the manufacturer, protected the
 filter and the motor from the weather.  Prior to sampling opera-
 tions  in the field, each hi-vol sampler was calibrated with
 a  series of resistance plates.  A secondary calibration
 curve  was  then developed for each sampler based on the primary
 calibration curve for the resistance plates.  Each sampler
 was thus indirectly comparable to other samples used in  the
 study  since all were calibrated using a common  source.
 Additional comparisons were made when duplicate simultaneous
 samples were taken using hi-vols placed next  to one another.
                 Glass fiber filters, Type A  (20.3 x 25.4  cm),
without an organic binder  (Gelman Instrument  Co.) were used
 for the particulate collection media.  A  light  table was
used for visual inspection of each  filter for thickness
variation and pinholes.  Filters passing  this test were
then sequentially numbered and separately placed  in clean
                            54

-------
polyethylene bags and sealed.  Those filters used for the particle



size distribution study were conditioned at a constant temperature



and humidity until a constant weight was achieved and then the



filters placed in separate bags and sealed.



            c.     Dustfall




                   Ten locations were selected throughout the study



area to collect settleable particulates.  Locations and times when



hi-vol samplers were operating nearby were avoided.  The open-top



collectors were set out for 28 days and were patterned after ASTM



designation D 1739-70.  Specifically the collection apparatus



consisted of an acid-washed polyethylene bucket with a polyvinyl-



chloride extension tube.  The dimensions were such that the height



of the bucket/extension tube was three times the diameter of the



opening in the extension tube.  The device was mounted atop a



2.5m pole and secured with guy wires.  A maximum 30-degree angle



was observed from the top of the collector to the nearest obstacles



such as trees or houses.  On top of the collection tube was a bird



ring.  It was placed so that if birds attempted to land on top of



the tube, the ring prevented this from happening.  Thus, any possible



contamination from birds was prevented.



                   Following the 28-day collection period, the




device was removed from its perch and covered.  The sample was




transferred to an acid-washed polyethylene bottle with multiple



deionized water rinses.  The sample was labelled and frozen.
                                   55

-------
      3.    Sample Analysis and Quality Control Procedures

            a.    Development of Analytical Methodology

                  Studies were performed to evaluate the analytical

methods for determining the lead concentration in  air particulate

samples collected on 20.3 x 24.4 cm glass fiber filters.

                  A single 2.5 x 20.3 cm strip was used from each

filter  (9.8% of total surface area) for lead analysis.   To determine

the variability of lead concentration over the total filter,  seven

2.5 x 20.3cm strips were cut from a single glass fiber filter sample

and analyzed according to the procedure for air particulate samples.

The results are given in Table 1 under precision of data.
                  Table 1. Analytical Parameters of  Environmental
                                  Samples
Sample Matrix
Sensitivity
Detection Limit '
Linear Range
Recovery
Precision:
n
mean
std. dev .
RSD
\ *• i
Air Particulate
0.019 (ig/m3
0.0 21 fig/m
3.38 jj-g/rn
96.3%

7
1.44 ug/m3
0.19 >ig/m3
13.2%
Outdoor Dust '
0.0006 ^g/cm
0.0058 ug/cm
0.070 (ig/cm
96.2%

7
0.035 jig/cm2
0.003 ng/cm2
8.3%
Soil10'
0.95 pg/g
1.02 |jLg/g
150 pg/g
90.0%

4
5.90 (jg/g
0.44 (ig/g
7.4%
            (1) see text  for  definition
            (2) does not  amply max inum linear range
            (3) based upon  average  recovery of low Pb spite in sample
               matrix
            (4) calculations  based  on 2000 m3 sample
            (5) surface area  of  179.07 cm2
            (6) based on  5g sample
                                    56

-------
At a mean lead concentration of 1.44 yg/m3, the relative



standard deviation was 13.2%.



                 While performing the field studies,



several air samplers were run simultaneously in pairs to



obtain some indication of the variation due to the air



samplers.  Section IIIA2 summarizes the results of this



study.  There was no significant variation in the lead



concentration of filters collected simultaneously.



                 The digestion time of air filters



was investigated to determine if this would be a critical



step in the procedure.  Replicate samples were digested



for 3 hours and for 24 hours according to the methodology.



The 3-hour samples' average lead concentration was 6.6 yg/m3



(RSD = 8.2%) and the 24-hour samples' average lead concentra-



tion was slightly higher at 7.2 yg/m3 (RSD = 8.6%).  This



slight difference between the 3-hour and 24-hour digestions



was not significant.



                 Table 1 summarizes the analytical para-



meters for air particulate samples.



                 The detection limit is defined as that



quantity of lead which will give a signal 2X the standard



deviation of a series of spiked samples whose lead signal



is distinctly above the background signal.  All values have




been converted into the appropriate unics for each sample




matrix.
                            57

-------
                 Sensitivity is defined as that quantity



of lead in the digested sample matrix which will give 1% absorp-




tion.



                 In summary, these investigations show




that low temperature ashing of the glass fiber filters prior



to digestion was not necessary.  The difference between



the ashed and non-ashed filters was within the 13.2 varia-



tion recorded for different samples from the same filter.



                 Digestion of the air filters was complete



within 3 hours and longer digestion times were not needed.



                 Since there could also be variation in



the collection process, high-vol air samplers were run in



pairs on several occasions to determine the range of varia-



tion due to the samplers themselves.  There were no signi-



ficant variations noted for any of these paired samplers.



                 The analytical methodology used for



air particulate lead analysis was simple and required mini-



mum sample handling.  This allowed for less contamination



of the samples and better data.  The time involved in evap-



orating off the digestion acids was rather lengthy, but



the addition of a flow of N2 reduced this time considerably.



                 For samples with high lead concentrations,



the method was easily adaptable to dilutions to maintain



the lead concentration in the linear working range of the



AAS.
                           58

-------
           b.    Air Particulate



                 The procedure of Thompson, Morgan and



Purdue (l->) was modified and used to analyze the air par-




ticulate samples for lead.



                 The 20.3 x 25.4 cm glass-fiber filter



was removed from its polyethylene bag and placed on a poly-



ethylene sheet.  A plexiglas template and stainless steel



surgical knife were used to cut a 2.5 x 20.3 cm strip from



the filter.  The remainder of the filter was returned to



its polyethylene bag.



                 The strip of filter removed was carefully



cut into 1-cm lengths and placed into a 2.5 x 8.5 cm Pyrex



extraction thimble using Teflon-coated forceps. Eighty mil-



liliters of digestion acid (16 ml of redistilled HC1 and



64 ml of redistilled HNC>3) was added to the specially con-



structed boiling flask (Figure 13)  and the extraction thimble



carefully lowered into its neck.  The flask was then connected



to the condenser unit and heat was applied.  Once the acids



began to reflux and wash over the filter strips, the tem-



perature was adjusted such that a continuous refluxing occurred.



Refluxing was continued for 3 hours before the heat was



removed and the digestion acids allowed to cool.  Several



milliliters of 0.1 NHNO^ were poured through the top of the



condenser and allowed to drain into the boiling flask.
                            59

-------
     Figure  13. Apparatus for the Acid Digestion of Air, Window Sill Wipe,
                      and Hand Wipe Samples
                                  Dust Cover
                                      Water Out
                                 — Water In

                                 34/45 Groundglass Joint
                A  Ahlin-type condenser
                B  Extraction vessel with course glass disk
                C  Specially constructed boiling flask
                D  Hot plate
                   The boiling  flask was  removed  from the

condenser unit and the extraction thimble removed.  The

boiling flask was placed on a hot plate (30QOC)  and a flow

of N2  added to assist in evaporating  the digestion acids.

Once the volume was reduced to several  milliliters (never
                              60

-------
to dryness)  the  flask was removed from the hot plate, cooled,

and quantitatively transferred to a graduated centrifuge

tube  (15 ml).  The sample volume was made to 5.0  ml with

deionized water  before the  sample was  centrifuged for 30

minutes  at 2000  RPM.

                   A portion  of the filtrate was decanted

into  a polyethylene vial  (5-ml)  taking care not to disturb

the precipitate  present.  One ml of this solution was pipetted

into  a 10-ml volumetric flask and made to volume  with de-

ionized  water.   This diluted solution  was then analyzed

for Pb by aspiration into an air-acetylene flame  AAS.

Table 2  gives the analytical parameters use for the AAS

determination of air and other sample  matrices.
                     Table 2.  Ana.lyti.cal Parameters lor Atomic
                        Absorption Spectrophotometric
                             Lead Analysis

[nsfrument
Pa ran1 ^^ ; r
ENVIRONMENTAL
Air
Soil
Outdoor
Dust
HOUSEHOLD | BIOLOGICAL
Water
Indoor
Dust
WmdowSdl| Veneous
Wipe ; Siood
Capillary 1 Hand-
Blood 1 wipe
                               233. 3 am
    Slit
    ~ o u r c •? L, ^ r r e n t
    Atomizatton   F'.anie  Flame Flame Flameless  FlameLesa  Flame Flameless  Flameless^'  Flame
     '.l^t:or. Factor  10
    () Flame = air/acetylene
     Flamclesa = grapnue tube furnace (HGA-2000).
    Ul F'-ar.ieless = graphite tube furnace (IL-455).
                              61

-------
                 Air particulate and outdoor dust samples



 (soil also) were quantitated for Pb content by analyzing



a series of appropriately spiked sample matrices using the



"method of additions" technique to establish an analytical



curve (peak height vs Pb concentration).  Analytical curves



were calculated on a Hewlett-Packard Model 9810A program-



mable calculator using a least-square regression program



to obtain the best fit to the data points.  Figures 14 and



15 are typical analytical curves used to determine the Pb



content of air and outdoor dust samples, respectively. Spiked



sample standards were routinely analyzed with every 15 to



20 samples.  This allowed a continuous upgrading of the



analytical curve used to quantitate the samples.



                 Air samples were diluted 1:10 to keep



their concentration within the linear range of the instrument.



                 Quality control samples consisted of spiked



samples of the appropriate matrix analyzed routinely with



the unknown samples.  At least 4 quality controls were used



to determine a daily recovery factor which was applied to



the unknown samples.



           c.    Dustfall




                 Outdoor dust samples were thawed and



transferred to a 250-ml Vycor beaker.  The sample container



was rinsed with several milliliters of concentrated HN03



and these rinsings added to the sample.  Then, 20 ml of
                            62

-------
concentrated  HN03 were added to  the sample and it was  placed




on a hot plate (150°C).  A raised  watchglass was placed




on the beaker to keep out contamination while the same was




digested-evaporated.  The sample was never allowed  to  boil





             Figure 14. Analytical Curve for Lead in Air Particulate
          300-
                                             15
                             63

-------
              Figure 15..  Analytical Curve for Lead in Outdoor Dust
   •rH
   0)
    0)
    cu
        180 L_
         160
         140
         1ZO
         100
         80
         60
          40
         20
                          5.0
                                         J_
                                         10.0
                                                      15.0
                                  Jig
and  when  1 to  3  ml remained, it  was  removed from the  hot

plate and allowed to  cool.
                                 64

-------
                 The sample was quantitatively transferred

to a graduated centrifuge tube (12-ml) and made to 5 ml

with deionized water.  After centrifuging for 30 minutes

at 3000 RPM, the supernatant was decanted into a small vial

without disturbing the silica precipitate.  This solution

was then analyzed for Pb using flame AAS.

                 Quantitation and quality control of the

outdoor dust samples has been described above.

D.   Determine the Relationship of
     Blood Level and Traffic

     1.    Description of the Study

           a.    Study Design

                 The study described herein was designed

to determine the relationship between blood lead and traffic

density.  To that purpose, a set of 442 volunteer partici-

pants were recruited who resided on streets with traffic

densities varying from less than 1,000 cars per day to greater

than 20,000 cars per day.  Only persons who routinely were

to be found at home and who did not have occupations which

routinely took them away from their residence were selected

to participate in the study.  From each participant, blood

samples were obtained as were other samples from the residence

(dust, soil, water) and these samples were chemically an-

alyzed regarding the amount of lead present.  Traffic den-

sities were measured for the street on which each partici-

pating residence was located.  A detailed statistical analysis
                            65

-------
was then performed on the numerical results of chemical



analysis and traffic counts to determine the relationship



between these parameters.



           b.    Data to be Collected



                 (1)   Demographic



                       The study was designed around a



population of participants who can be generally character-



ized as white, middle class, who routinely spend their time



at home most of the time and who do not have unusual exposure



to lead.  To obtain demographic information on selected



households and on the residents of selected households,



appropriate questionnaire forms were designed.  The study



design was to collect demographic information with question-



naire forms on 1000 households and on 480 individuals re-



cruited and selected as voluntary paid participants.



                 (2)   Environment a].



                       On each street and residence selected



for the study, study design included collection of a set



of environmental data.  This included obtaining traffic



counts on each street selected and collection of a set of



environmental samples at each residence: soil samples, tap



water, house dust,  and windowsill wipes.  In addition a



measurement of the amount of lead in surface paint and a



handwipe(from pre-school children) was obtained from par-



ticipating residences.
                           66

-------
                 (3)   Biological



                       From each study participant the study




design included collection of a blood sample for analysis



of lead content.  For adults and larger preschool children,



this was accomplished with a venipuncture.  For smaller



preschool children, the required blood sample was collected



with a finger prick.



     2.    Data Collection Procedures




           a.    Demographic



                 For use in the household surveys, a house-



hold questionnaire form was developed in two parts, one



directed to information on households, including all persons



in the household collectively, and a second part directed



to information on individuals who might serve as study par-



ticipants.  Appropriate questions were formulated to obtain



the information sought on households and on individuals.



This questionnaire as well as supporting material was then



sent to OMB for approval (see Appendix C).



                 Clearance for development of a new form



was obtained from OMB, and an OMB number was assigned (0MB-



158-575022 with an expiration date of February 1977).  A



number of changes and improvements to the draft form shown



in Appendix C were made by EPA and OMB in the process of



obtaining OMB clearance.  These are reflected in the final




format of the form, shown in two parts:  Traffic Lead House-
                            67

-------
hold   Questionnaire   (Figure   16)   and  Traffic  Lead  Indivi-

dual   Questionnaire   (Figure   17).
                    INTERVIEWER USE ONLY
                    Interviewer ID *	
                    Household ID tt	
                    Estimated Traffic Level I
                                                                                 OMB #168-375022
OFFICE USE ONLY
Expiration Date February, 1977
'p*i  i   i   i  1   D
Cols. 1234    5
                                                       TRAFFIC LEAD
                                                 HOUSEHOLD QUESTIONNAIRE
                     NAME:
                               Last Name

                     ADDRESS:    Street_

                                 City	
                                                      Middle Initial
                                 Zip Code_
                                 Talephone_
                          How long have you and your household lived at this address?.
                          Does any member of your household routinely spend a portion of most
                          days away from the home?
                             Yes 	    No 	      Total Number
                          If Yes, specify by name_
                          Then, are there any other members of your household who routinely spend
                          most of their time at home?
                             Yes	___   No	         Total Number

                          What are the ages, sexes, and family position jf these members?
Name
Age
Sex
Position
























                                                      Total Number Meeting Criteria

                          During the time in which your household has lived at this address, has
                          any household member been employed as:
                          (a) garage mechanic
                          (b) road maintenance worker
                          (c) solderer or welder
                          (d) shipyard worker
                          (e) battery reclamation plant worker
                          (0 electrical parts assembler
                          (g) plumber
                          (h) ore smelter worker
                             Yes
                                             No
                          If Yes, complete the appropriate sections of the matrix.

                     6.    Are any of the following articles used in storing, preparing, or serving
                          food in your household?
                          (1)  Unglazed Mexican type pottery
                          (2)  Glazed Mexican type pottery
                          (3)  Hand painted china flatware
                          (4)  Any combination of (he above
                          (5)  None of the above
                  9-28

                  29-43
                                                                                                  49-50
             D"-
Name of
Member








No. Years
Employed








Dates of
Employment








Total
No.








54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
                      Figure  16.    Traffic  Lead  Household Questionnaire.
                                                    68

-------
 10.
 11.

 12.
 13,
        Has any member oi" your household been screened for excess lead
        absorption?
        (1) Yes	(2)  No	

        Has any member of your household been diagnosed as having excess
        lead absorption?
        (1) Yes	 (2)  No	
        If Yes, specify members by name	
  9.     Is your home cooled with any of the following appliances?
        (1) Central air conditioning           (5) Ceiling exhaust fan
        (2) Window air conditioning          (6) Other	
        (3) Evaporative cooler
        (4) Window fan
        What type of structure is your house?   (Sl'~o or more of exterior
        surface)
        (I) Sc'id brick, concrete, or rock      (6)  Composition siding
        (2) Brick or rock veneer              (7)  Wood frame
        (3) Stucco                         (8)  Other	
        (4) Asbestos shingle
        (5) Aluminum siding
        Wlut is the approximate age of your house? .
                                                    _ years
What is the highest educational level completed by your head of
household?
(1)  less than 8 th grade                (5) trade or vocational schoot
(2)  Sih grade                           beyond high school
(3)  lugh school - incomplete           (6> college (4 years) - incomplete
(4)  high-.chool-complete             {7) college (4 years) - complete
                                   (8) post graduate

Would you or any of your family members participate in a health survey as
a paid volunteer?
    Yes	    No	
If yes, specify members by name       ^     	 	          	
                                       Total Number of Participant Forms Collected
                                                                                     D
                                                                             D
                                                                                        64
                                                                                               65
                                                                                               70
  INTERVIEWER NOTE AND RECORD

 14.    Width of road bv number of lanes.

 IS.    Is street a divided highway?
       (I)  Yes	(2) No	
 16.    Estimated distance ot' residence from center of roadway m leet.
 17.    Is residence at an intersection?
       (1)  Yes	(2) No
 18.    Is residence facing primary street?
       (1)  Yes	 (2) No_
                                                                             n
                                                                             n
                                                                             D
                                                                             n
71


72

73-75


76


77
19.    On which side of street is house located?
       ll)  East    12) West    (3)  North     (4) South
                                                                             D
       Interviewer's Initials.
                                                                                       H       80
Figure  16.    Traffic  Lead  Household  Questionnaire   (Cont'd.)
                                      69

-------
 INTERVIEWER USE ONLY
 Interviewer ID &	
 Household ID *	
                                                               OMB # 158-S75022
OFFICE USE ONLY
Expiration Date February, 1977
ID #|_
Cols. 1
Mill
2345
                                      TRAFFIC LEAD
                               INDIVIDUAL QUESTIONNAIRE
 NAME:
               Last Name
                  6-20
      Sex:    (I) Male_

      Date of Birth:
   First Name
     21-32

(2)  Female	
Middle Initial
    33
                                                  DOB
                    Month
                               Day
                                        Year
     How many years have you lived in this city?
  4.  How many years have you lived at this address?
                    ACE IN YEARS

                   	 years

                   	 years
  5.  In your hobbies do you either make or use any of the following items?
     (I)  Homemade pottery      (5)  Other known contacts with lead
     (2)  Lead soldiers                Specify	
     (3)  Hand painted china      (6)  Any combination of the above
     (4)  Solder                 (7)  None of the above

  b.  On the average how many hours a week do you spend away from home?
     	hours.

  7   On the average how many hours do you spend riding in cars or buses
     around town?	hours.

  8.  Have you ever been diagnosed as being anemic?
     tl)  Yes	          (2)   No
 9.  Have you experienced in the last month any of the following?
     (I)   Fever over 10! degrees    (4)   Any combination of the above
     (2)   Hospitalization          (5)   None of the above
     (3)   Traumatic injury

1 0.  Have you ever smoked as many as five packs of cigarettes, that is. as many
     as 1 00 cigarettes during your entire life?
     (I)   Yes _        (7)   No _
II    Do you now smoke cigarettes''
     (I)  Yes _
                                  NO
                                                                                      6-33
                                                         47
                                                       48-50
                                                       51-53
                                                •D

                                                 D
                                                                                       54
                                     55
                                                                                       56
                                                                                       57
     Figure 17.   Traffic Lead Individual Questionnaire
                                          70

-------
12.   Ifyouarea current or an e \-cigarette smoker:
     a. How many cigarettes do (did) you smoke per day?
       (I)   Less than 1/2 pack per day ( 1-5 Cigarettes per davl
       (2)   About  1/2 pack per day (6-14 cigarettes per day)
       (3)   About  1 pack per Jay I 15-25 cigarettes per Jay)
       (4)   About  1-1/2 packs per day (26-34 cigarettes per day)
       ( 5)   About  2 packs  per day (35 or more cigarettes per  day)
       (9)   N/A
     b. How old were you when you first started smoking?	years
       (99)  N/A
     c. How old were you when you last gave up smoking, it  you no
       longer smoke'.'	years
       (09)  N/A

13.   If individual is a child:    (Preschool Ould!
     a. Is the child involved in my oi the following activmes'
       (  I)   Play or nursery school
       I 2)   Day care  away  from its hume
       (3)   Routinely stays away Horn home either at relatives or with Iriends
       (4)   Any combination of Hie above
       (5)   None ol the above
14
    n
m
                                                                                      5^-60
     b. What is I he child'; usual play site''
       At home indoors
       At home outdoors near the  hou.-e
       \t home outdoors near the street
       Elsewhere
                                        Number of Hours Per Day
                                        Number of Hours Per Day
                                        Number of Hours Per Day
                                        Number of Hours Per Day
     It individual is an adult.    ( 20 years old or over)
     j  Winch of the following best describes your activity pattern?
       (I)  Employed outside  the home     5)  Full-time student
       (2)  Employed inside the home     !6)  Rclired
       (3l  I'nemployed                 (71  Other	
                                             N/A
       14)   Housewife                   C'l
       For all lobs held in the last year please -.tale lor each:
       I 1)   Nature of company, business or agency	
       (2)   Specific job performed	
       (3)   Number of years spent on job	 years
       (4)   On the job were you ever exposed lo lead?
             (ll   Yes	  (2)   No	
       It >'ei. ^pe^il\ details	
                                                                                      61-62
         64-65
         66-67
         68-60
         70-71
                                                                                        72
                                                                                 n
                       YOU HAVE COMPLETED THE QUESTIONNAIRE.
                                       THANK YOU
Interviewer's Initials.
                                                          IMNO\VOI2345(.
                                                                                         74

                                                                                         so
            Figure 17.    Traffic  Lead  Individual  Questionnaire   (Cont.'d)
                                           71

-------
            b.      Household Data Recording and  Scheduling
                     (1)    Data Recording
                            This  project  required  that  a large

amount of sample  information be  gathered  from the  partici-

pants and their homes.   To minimize  duplication and centralize

this information,  a "Participants and Household Checklist"

was  made for  each household  participating  in  this  study-

Figure 18 is  an example of the form  used.
                                   Figure 18.
                            NEIGHBORHOOD LEAD STUDY
                           Participants &c Household Checklist
                                    01-4294
                                 Appnt. Time:
                                 Day:	~
                                 Area:
                      Prtcpnt
         Prtcpnt
                                                Prtcont
Prtcpnt
        I. Informed Consent
          Blood
          Handwipe
          (children only)
          Date Collected
        II.  Window sill wipe
           Tap water
           Soil
           Indoor dust
           Outdoor dust
       HE. Lead in Paint
            Rhenium filter count
            Lead filter count
            Results
1st- sample-Znd










1st- sample- Znd










1st- sample- 2nd










1st- sample- Znd










                           Date Collected
                                           Start Date
                              Indoor
                                                Outdoor
                                       mg/cm
                                17-20
       IV  Distar-ce from
           Roadway to:
House front
              ft;
                                                  2Z-Z5
                    House rear
                                                                  Date
                                 mg/cm-
                                   ft.
                                  28-30
                                                      33-33
       V.   CadmiurnParticipants ?
                                72

-------
                       Information collected by the bio-




logical collection teams, the paint analyzer, and on the



soil collected were all recorded on this one sheet for each



household.



                       Item I on this checklist provided



space for up to four participants at each household to



include 1st and 2nd blood samples, hand-wipe samples, and



date collected.



                       Item II provided information on the



household samples collected.



                       Item III was for recording x-ray



analyses data on paint measurements.



                       Item IV provided space for measure-



ment of house location in relationship to the street where



traffic densities were measured.



                       Item V was included for informa-



tional purposes on another EPA project  (EPA Contract 68-02-



1725).



                       Also, a specific area on the check-




list was used to indicate that the second set of validation



forms had been completed.



                       Prior to each day of biological and



environmental sample collection, these checklist sheets



were organized in each team's notebook according to the



households that team was scheduled to visit.  Also included






                            73

-------
with each household checklist was  the  necessary sample




labels for all samples to be collected at that location




at that specific time.



                       Once the biological collection teams




had collected the first samples from each household, the




checklist sheets were placed into  the  paint analyzer's




notebook.  After the paint analysis had been completed




at each residence, the checklist sheets were placed into




the soil collector's notebook.  The checklist sheets were




stored in a master notebook following  the entry of the soil




data until the biological collection teams needed them for




the collection of the second blood samples.




                       After all samples at each household




had been completed, the checklist  sheets were returned




to the master notebook to prevent  them from being lost




during shipment to the San Antonio laboratories.




                       These checklist sheets provided




a convenient means of accounting for which and what type




of samples had been collected at each  household.




                       Similar checklist sheets were main-



tained on the traffic counting and air sampling operations




as described under the appropriate heading.




                 (2)    Scheduling




                       Once the household surveys were complete



(March 26,  1976), the SMU on-site coordinator  began scheduling
                            74

-------
participants for collection of biological and household



samples.  This was accomplished using the following protocol:




                        (a)  Participant information sheets



were arranged according to general location within the city.




                        (b)  Next, the sheets were grouped



by street name, then by address.




                        (c)  One to three schedulers would



then begin telephoning  the participant in a specific area



to arrange a time for the biological collection teams to



come by.



                        (d)  As the appointments were made



they were listed on worksheets giving the date, time, name,



and address of the participant(s).  These worksheets were



made up daily for each biological collection team.



                        (e)  At the end of each day the bio-



logical manager would pick up the worksheets and arrange



the checklist sheets in each biological collection team's



notebook according to the schedule.  The appropriate computer



printed labels were attached to each checklist and the note-



books were ready for the following day's sampling activities.



                        (f)  The day before the scheduled



appointment, a second telephone call was made to remind the



participants about the appointment.



                       In the first week of scheduling,




30 minutes per household was alloted for sample collection.
                            75

-------
This was later reduced to 20 minutes because of the effici-



ency and experience of the biological collection teams.



                       Because the study could not be con-



fined to one area of the city as initially planned, scheduling



of participants became a critical factor to the success



of the project.  The primary thought behind the scheduling



protocol was to minimize the travel time of the collection



teams between appointments.  A self-contained "mobile lab-



oratory"  (16 ft. motor home) was used to further reduce



travel time of the collection teams.  Each day of sample



collection, the mobile laboratory would be parked at some



central location within the area being sampled.  Usually



this was a church or school parking lot.  This allowed the



biological collection teams to bring their samples in for



processing and provided a convenient place to wait between



appointment (if necessary).  Also, the biological manager



was located at the mobile laboratory and this gave him better



control of the sample collection efforts.  Frequent contact



was made between the SMU on-site coordinator and the bio-



logical manager at the mobile laboratory to accommodate



any last minute schedule changes.




                       After the second week of sampling,



the biological collection teams were familiar with the



different sampling areas and the scheduling was routine



enough that a centralized location was used to coordinate



the activities of the collection teams rather than the mobile



laboratory.




                            76

-------
                       Scheduling of paint analysis and



soil collection was usually made one to two days before



the actual collection.  This was handled by the individual



performing the collection or analysis.



           c.    Environmental



                 (1)   Traffic Counts



                       Traffic was counted to categorize



participant homes into sites.  Each street on which a par-



ticipant's residence was located had a traffic count taken.



If a number of participants lived within a given block and



there was no major cross street between residences then



one count was taken to represent all those particular re-



sidences.  For certain streets, th-en, multiple counts were



required because of the intervention of major side streets



or controlled intersections.  Participant homes located



on corners had both the principal street counted as well



as the side street.



                 (2)   Soil



                       At each residence of participants



in this study, a soil sample was collected.  The sample



was collected at the front of the house near the front



door.  Surface soil was collected from flower beds or similar



exposed areas.  In selecting an area for sampling, an effort



was made to stay away from those areas which appeared to



have sand or top soil recently applied.  If the area to



be sampled was next to the house, a check of the area for
                            77

-------
paint chips was made.  If no chips were seen, then a sample




was taken at least 0.3m away from the house.  This minimum




distance was maintained to avoid any possible contamination




that might have occurred if the house had been previously




painted with lead-based paint.  The soil sample was collected




with a stainless steel trowel.  The sample was then trans-




ferred to an acid-washed 250-ml polyethylene bottle for




Pb analysis.  A computer-printed label designating soil




from that particular residence was attached to the bottle.




A second sample was also collected for the determination




of soil characteristics.




                  (3)   Tap Water




                       Water samples were collected in




474-ml polyethylene containers by the biological collection




team during the first visit to each household.  The samples




were collected from the cold water tap in the kitchen.




The water was allowed to run for approximately 1 minute.




Then the polyethylene container was rinsed 3 times before




being filled.  The appropriate label was attached and within




3 hours of collection the water samples were returned to




the mobile laboratory.  The samples were acidified  (approxi-




mately 1%)  with HN03 (reagent grade) and stored at room




temperature until shipment.  Water samples were frozen and




packed in dry ice to minimize leakage during shipment to




the San Antonio laboratories.






                            78

-------
                 (4)   Housedust



                       These samples were collected in a



23.0 x 31.2 cm plastic tray over a period of 28 days.



The trays were placed by a member of the biological collec-



tion team during their first visit to the household.  Loca-



tion of where the tray was placed and the date was recorded



on the checklist sheet.  Ideally the trays were to be placed



in an area where air current would not affect them or children



have access to them.  Usually the top of the refrigerator



was the place where most dust trays were placed.



                       Instructions were given to the house-



hold participants about the dust trays.  The trays were



not to be disturbed for any reason and a staff member would



call in about 28 days to make arrangements to pick up the



tray.



                       Collection of the dust trays was



carried out by one member of the biological collection



team.  Usually appointments were made by areas to reduce



the travel time required to collect them.  This caused



some trays not to be collected exactly on the 28th day. The



exact number of days for each dust sample is given in Appendix E.




                       The contents of the tray were quan-



titatively rinsed into a 474-ml polyethylene bottle with



deionized water.  The appropriate computer-generated label



was attached and the sample stored at room temperature





                            79

-------
until shipment to the San Antonio laboratories.  To mini-



mize leakage during shipment, all samples were frozen and




packed in dry ice.



                  (5)    Windowsill Wipes



                       These samples were collected in a




room nearest the street being counted.  The biological



collection team collected these samples from each household.



Commercially available "Wash'n Dri Towelettes" were selected



for this particular sampling after several brands were



analyzed for Pb content prior to the field sampling.  This



particular brand had the lowest Pb content of any brand




tested.



                       Initially, a plexiglas template 7.7



x 45.5 cm was used as a reference in collection of windowsill



wipes.  This proved unsuitable because many windowsills



were too small to cover all of the template.  Each collec-



tion team was supplied with a ruler and the actual area



of the windowsill sampled was measured and recorded on the



checklist sheet.  The procedure used to wipe the windowsill



was standardized so each team would collect the samples



the same way. After wiping the windowsill by the prescribed



method, the handy wipe was placed in a self-sealing poly-



ethylene bag and the appropriate label attached.



                       These samples required no further



processing in the field.  They were packed and shipped at



ambient temperature.





                            80

-------
                 (6)   Paint




                       A description of the x-ray analyzer



used for paint analysis is given later (see sample analysis).



During the first visit of the biological collection team



to each household,  the participants were told to expect



a call from the paint analyzer to set up a time to survey



their home (usually within 2 to 3 days).



                       Normally, the time required to complete



the Pb paint survey for each household was approximately



20 to 25 minutes.  At each household, two rooms were anal-



yzed and at least two separate readings were performed on



the exterior paint of the house. These readings were immed-



iately recorded on the checklist sheet and converted into



mg Pb/cm^ with the appropriate calibration graphs.




                       Verification of the calibration of



the x-ray analyzer was performed at least twice each day.



Every night the instrument was connected to a charger unit



so the batteries would be fully charged for each day's sampling,



                 (7)   Hand-wipes



                       Each child participating in this



study had one hand-wipe sample collected from him/her during



the first or second visit of the biological collection team



to the home.   Collection of handwipe samples from children




recently bathed were postponed until the second visit.






                           81

-------
                       The hand-wipe sample was collected




 just prior to taking the blood sample from the child.   If




 a capillary blood sample was to be collected, then the  hand-




 wipe became an integral part of the blood collection pro-




 cedure  (see Biological Samples).



                       One "Wash  *n Dri Towelette" was  used




 to  thoroughly wipe both hands of  the child. This  "towelette"




 was then placed in a polyethylene bag and the proper label




 attached.  Prior to taking this hand-wipe, the laboratory




 technician would use a "towelette" to clean her hand to




 reduce  the possibility of contamination.




                  (8)   Validation




                       A validation of information regarding




 each residence was performed during the collection of bio-




 logical samples.  A validation form  (Figure 19) was used




 to  collect pertinent data on each residence to be checked




 against the household questionnaire data.  All households




 selected for the study met the established criteria.




                       A validation of information regarding




 each participant was performed during the collection of




 participant samples.  A validation form (Figure 20) was




 used to collect pertinent data on each participant to be




 checked against the participant questionnaire data.  All




participants selected for collection of biological samples




met the established criteria.
                            82

-------
                   Figurel9. Household Validation Form
                          Traffic Lead Validation
     Informant's Name:
           Address:_

           Phone $~
      Family Position:_
     Household Queaiions-Circle Responses-Far right responses disqualify household.

     1. Do you live in a. corner residence?
             No       Yes

     2. Do you live in d single family dwelling or a duplex?
             Yes      No

     3. Is your residence 100 feet or less from the street?
             Yes      No

     4. Does your residence face the street?
             Yes      No

     5. Do you live on the ground floor?
             Yes      No

     6. Do you live within 300 feet of a traffic signal or a stop sign?
             No       Yes                         Household Eligible-Yes  No
             d.     Biological

                     (1)    General

                           The biological  collection  teams  collected

two  blood samples from each participant approximately one

week apart.     These  were  venous  blood  samples collected

from trie  antecubital vein using  a 10 ml Vacutainer  (minimal  Pb) .

From previous  experience,  collecting venous blood from  small

children  was not always possible and many  times  this would

bias the  data  in the younger age groups.   To assure sufficient
                                 83

-------
                            Figure 20. Traffic Lead Validation

        Individual Questions — Circle Responses-Far right responses disqualify individual.

        1.  Name of Member:	

        2.  How long have you lived at this address?
             3 months or more            Less than 3 months

        3.  Sex:     Male
                  Female

        4.  Age in years: 	
        5.  If individual is a. child:

             Age:     1 thru 5 years             Less than 1  year 8c
                                            more than 5 years

             Does your child spend more than 30 hours a week away from home?
                     No                      Yes

             If yes:
               How many hours does your child spend away from home?
               Where does your child spend those hours?	
        6.  If individual is a female:

             Age:     20 thru 49 years           Less than 20 years k
                                           more than 49 years

             On the average, how many hours a week do you spend away from home?
                     Less than 30 hours per week     30 hours or more per week

        7.  If the individual is 50 years old or more:

             On the average, how many hours a week do you spend away from home?
                     Less than 30 hours per week       30 hours or more per week

             Are you retired from your work or work in your home?
                     Yes                    NO

        8.  I  M  N  O  W  O	Unk.

        9.  Date of Validation:
       10. Interviewer's Initials
                                               Individual Eligible     Yes     No


data  points  in  the  younger age  groups,  an alternate type

of blood  sampling procedure  would  be used in those diffi-

cult  cases.   Capillary blood taken by  the "finger-prick"

method was the  alternate  procedure chosen because  it was

relatively easy to  perform on a reluctant child  and it was

less  traumatic  than the venipuncture technique.


                                  84

-------
                       Because the "finger-prick" technique



limits the volume  (lOOul) of blood taken for analysis and



the procedure is more liable to contamination problems(-^)



every effort was made to convince the child and parent(s)



to allow the venous blood be taken.



                       Fewer venous blood samples were



taken from children on this project than we initially an-



ticipated.  The reason for this may be the fact that pro-



viding an alternate procedure, which in the mind of the



parent is less traumatic to the child, may counteract any



argument for the venous blood sample that the laboratory



technician could make.



                 (2)   Venous



                       Venous blood was taken from partici-



pants by the routine venipuncture technique commonly used



in clinical laboratories.  The procedure was modified in



that dilute HNO3 (3ml/liter) rinse of the puncture site



was included to reduce the possibility of Pb contamination



from the skin.  The blood was collected in 10ml Vacutainer



(Becton-Dickinson Co., Rutherford, N.J.) using the minimal



Pb type  (L3200XF313) containing 143 USP units of sodium



heparin.  Previous tests with this type of Vacutainer in-



dicated the Pb content to be approximately 0.1 yg per tub



                       Once the blood had been drawn, properly



labeled, and thoroughly mixed, it was immediately placed
                            85

-------
in a small styrofoam cooler containing wet ice to maintain



it at a chilled temperature.  The blood samples remained



in this cooler from 30 minutes up to 3 hours depending upon



the sampling schedule of the biological collection teams.



At the centralized location (mobile laboratory) one of the



10ml Vacutainers from each participant was opened and an



aliquot taken for hematocrit determination.  The unopened



Vacutainers were properly marked to be used for the blood-



Pb determination at the San Antonio laboratories.  The Vacu-



tainer which was opened was also sent along with the unopened



one as a reserve.



                  (3)   Fingerprick



                       Capillary blood samples were collected



from children using the recommendations of Bratzel and Reed



                       Usually, the child would sit in the



parent's lap during the blood drawing to maintain control



and to relieve the stress associated with the procedure.



The child's arm would be fully extended and held at the



elbow by the parent.  The laboratory technician would grasp



the child's hand and wash it very thoroughly using a "Wash1



Dri towelette."  Next, the 3rd or 4th finger would be held



in such a way that the terminal digits were exposed and



under complete control of the technician.  A vigorous scrub



was then made of the exposed finger using a gauze pad soaked



in Phisohex soap.  This would be followed by another gauze
                             86

-------
pad soaked in deionized water.  Another gauze pad soaked



in dilute HNO^(3ml/liter) would be used to scrub the finger




tip followed by another deionized water rinse and a final



rinse with an isopropyl alcohol soaked pad.  A sterile micro-



lance was used to puncture the skin and the first few drops



of blood were allowed to flow freely.



                       A 100 yl capillary blood-collection



tube (ESA, Inc., Burlington, MA)  was then used to collect



the blood.  Care was taken not to contaminate the puncture



site or the capillary tube.  Once the tube was filled to



the mark, the laboratory technician would tilt the tube



so the blood would not run out either end and hand it to



the other team member to seal with polyethylene end caps.



If possible, 3 or 4 such samples were collected from the



same puncture site along with two hematocrit tubes.



                       These samples were placed into a




polyethylene bag and the appropriate label attached.  They



were stored in the styrofoam ice chest until the collection



team returned to the mobile laboratory.



                       Immediately upon receipt of the



samples at the mobile laboratory, the hematocrits were de-



termined and the samples stored in the refrigerator until



shipment to the San Antonio laboratories.



                       Following each day of sample collec-




tion, all blood samples were packed in styrofoam mailers



containing dry ice and shipped to the San Antonio laboratories

-------
by air express (counter to counter delivery).  Usually the




time from collection of the blood until it was analyzed




for Pb averaged less than 24 hours.



     3.    Sample Analysis Procedures



           a.    General



                 (1)   Instrumentation



                       All analyses were performed on either



a Perkin-Elmer Model 503 Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer



 (AAS) or a Perkin-Elmer Model 306 AAS.  The Model 306 AAS



is modified  (Perkin-Elmer Modification Kit 040-0286) to



reduce "stray light" from reaching the photomultiplier tube



during operation of the flameless sampling devices.



                       Both AAS units are equipped with



a Deuterium-Arc background corrector which corrects for



non-specific absorption.  The background corrector was



routinely used on all analyses.




                       Absorption peaks were recorded on



a Perkin-Elmer Model 056 Recorder with a lOmv range.




                       Flameless analyses were performed



with the following graphite tube furnaces:  (1) a Perkin-



Elmer HGA-2100 with the Model 503 AAS, (2) a Perkin-Elmer



HGA-2000 with the Model 306 AAS, and  (3)  an Instrumentation



Laboratory IL-455 with the Model 306 AAS.  Flame analyses



on both AAS units were by air-acetylene flames using a



single-slot,  10-cm Burner Head  (Perkin-Elmer Model 303-0418).






                            88

-------
                  (2)   Reagents




                       All  regents  used  for  the preparation



and analysis of  the  samples on this contract were  of  analy-



tical grade or better.




           b.     General Quality Control



                  A major problem in trace metal analysis



is contamination of  glassware, reagents, and samples  with



the metal(s) being analyzed.  Minimizing this problem re-



quires an extensive  control program involving glassware



cleaning, protection, and quality control measures.



                  (1)   Cleaning



                       All  glassware and polyethylene con-



tainers  that come in contact with samples or reagents are



cleaned  by the following procedure:  Items are washed



thoroughly with  a laboratory detergent  (Alconox, Inc., New



York) in tap water.  The clean glassware is  rinsed with



deionized water  and  placed  in an acid vat containing  HNC>3(1:1)



and allowed to soak  for 6 to 18 hours.  Clean polyethylene



containers are also  placed  in the acid vat but are removed



after 4  to 6 hours.  After  acid soaking, the items are rinsed



thoroughly with  deionized water and placed in a drying oven



until dry.  The  dry  items are placed in a dust-free area



and allowed to cool.  Polyethylene  containers are  capped



and sealed in polyethylene  bags until ready  for use.  Glass-



ware  is returned to its proper container  (see below) and



stored in glassware  cabinets until  ready for use.
                            89

-------
                 (2)    Protection




                       All glassware items are kept in poly-




ethylene containers to minimize exposure to dust in the




laboratory.  Each container is numbered and contains one




type of glassware (i.e., watchglasses, 4-ml volumetric flask,




etc.).  When all the glassware in a container has been used,




it is returned to that container and carried through the




washing procedure (see above) as a unit.  While the glassware




is being washed, the container is also washed.  Once the




glassware has completed the wash cycle and dried, it is




returned to the proper container.  Several items (3 to 7)




of glassware are removed from the container at this time




for quality control checks.




                 (3)   Quality Control




                       The number of each container of glass-




ware going through the wash cycle is entered into a log




book.  Other information, such as name of technician per-




forming washing procedure, type of glassware, length of




acid-soaking, etc., are also recorded in this log book.




This allows the glassware removed for quality control checks




to be identified with a particular set of glassware being




used in the laboratory.  The glassware removed for quality




control purposes is checked by rinsing with a known volume




of 0.1N HN03 and comparing with the same acid that has not




been used for rinsing.  Normally one metal (Pb) is used




for quality control checks but other metals may also be
                           90

-------
included if needed. The graphite furnace (AAS) is used for



quality control analysis.  Glassware which shows a signi-



ficant difference between the used and unused rinsing acids



metal content is referred back to the container number from



which it came.  That container is then returned to the wash-



room and the wash cycle repeated on all of its glassware.



           c.    Soil



                 Soil samples were analyzed for Pb using



a modification of the preferential leach procedure Smith



and Window'-*-"'used on dried sediment samples.  Table 1 sum-



marizes the analytical parameter for soil samples.  The



soil sample was dried at 65°C overnight in an oven.  The



dried soil was ground to powder using a mortar and pestle



and sieved through a 250 micron stainless steel screen.



Then 5 g of the powdered sample was weighted into a 125-ml



Erlenmeyer flask and 50 ml of the leach solution {acetic



acid: hydroxylamine HCL  (7:3)} was added.  A polyethylene



stopper was used to seal the flask.  The sample was then



placed on a mechanical shaker for 12 to 18 hours  (overnight).



                 The leach solution was filtered through



a glass-fiber filter (9cm) which had previously been rinsed



with the leach solution.  The filtrate was collected in



a 50-ml polyethylene bottle and lead was determined on this




solution using flameless AAS.
                            91

-------
                 Soil  samples were quantitated  for  Pb con-


tent by the procedure  used for air particulate  and  outdoor


dust.  Figure 21 represents a typical analytical  curve for


soil-Pb.  Quality control  samples were spiked soil  samples


which were handled according to the procedures  detailed for


air particulate samples.


              Figure 21. Analytical Curve for Lead in Soil
          180,—
                        50
       100

\ig Pb / g m



 92
 J
150

-------
             d.
Water
                   Acidified water  samples  were analyzed

directly by  flameless AAS.   No digestion  or concentration

was  necessary on these samples.   Table  3  summarizes  the

analytical parameters for  water samples.   Water  samples


              Table 3..  Analytical Parameters of Environmental Samples
        Sample Matrix

        Sensitivity * '
   Window Sill Wipes

    0.6 ng/cm
                                   (4)
        Detection Limit    5.0 ng/cm2
Linear Range
Recovery
Precision
n
mean
std. dev.
RSD
110 ng/cm2
109.5%

6
26.0 ng/cm2
2.0 ng/cm2
8.7 %
Water
                                       94.4%
                                       25.0%
           Indoor Dust
                                                          (5)
0.04 ng/ml   0.075 ng/cm'

0.2 ng/ml    1.0 ng/cm2

4.0 ng/ml    7.0 ng/cm2
                              95.6%
                                       0.4 ng/ml   8.7 ng/cm2
                                       0.1 ng/ml   0.7 ng/cm2
                              8.0%
        (1)  see text for definition
        (2)  does not imply maximum linear range
        (3)  based upon average recovery of low Pb spike in sample matrix
        (4)  surface area used to calculate = 350.4 cm2
        (5)  surface area = 717.6 cm2
were quantitated  by the  "method of additions"  described

earlier  for air particulate samples.   Figure  22 represents

a  typical  analytical curve.  Quality  control  consisted of

Pb spiked  water samples  routinely analyzed with the  unknown
                                93

-------
samples.  A recovery factor was  determined from  these quality
controls and  applied to the water samples.

              Figure 22. Analytical Curve for Lead in Water
         180 r-
         160 L_
                   1.5
3,0      4.5      6.0
  ng Pb/ml  (ppb)
                                              7.5
            e.     House Dust
                   The same procedure used to  analyze the
 outdoor dust  samples was used  to determine the  Pb content  of

                                94

-------
the indoor dust  samples.   Table 3 summarizes  the analy-




tical parameters for house dust samples.   The Pb concentra-




tion was determined by flameless AAS.  Indoor dust samples




were measured  by the same procedures used  for water samples,




Figure 23 is a typical analytical curve.   Quality controls




and recoveries were the same as described  for water.






             Figure 23. Analytical Curve for Lead in Indoor Dust
                                          5.0     6.0     7.0
                            95

-------
           f.     Windowsill Wipes



                 The windowsill wipe samples which were



collected on "Wash 'N Dri"  towelettes were analyzed by the



procedure used for the particulate air samples.   Table 3



summarizes the analytical parameters for windowsill wipes.



The towelette was carefully removed from the polyethylene



bag and placed into the 2.5 x 8.5 cm extraction  thimble.



Eighty milliliters of the digestion acid were added and



the apparatus assembled as  previously described  (Figure



13).  The final volume of the sample was brought to 5.0



ml with deionized water prior to centrifuging.  An aliquot



of this final volume was analyzed for Pb by flame AAS.



Quantitation of these samples was by the procedure given



for water samples above.  Figure 24 is a typical example



of an analytical curve.  Quality controls and recoveries



were the same as described above for water samples.



           g.     Paint X-Ray Fluorescence



                 Each home where participants of this study



resided was analyzed for lead in wall paint.  An x-ray fluor-



escence analyzer, Model 700, manufactured by Columbia Scien-



tific Industries, Austin, Texas, was used for this determina-



tion.  This instrument employed a 3 me Cd10^ source with



a lead and rhenium filter.   Standardization of the instru-



ment was obtained using lead standards borrowed from Columbia



Scientific.  These standards consisted of various concentra-



tions of lead ranging from 0 to 6.89 mg/cm2 in polyethylene
                           96

-------
              Figure 24. Analytical Curve for Lead in Window,Sill Wipes
          20 —
wafers.  By  a  combination of these  standards with various




substrates  (1/4"  masonite, 1/2"  sheetrock, 3/4" and 1-1/2"



wood, aggregate and brick), a calibration curve was obtained



for any combination of substrate material and/or lead  level





                            97

-------
encountered in participants'  homes.   Figures 25 and 26




illustrate these calibration  curves.





       Figure 25.. X-Ray Fluorescence Analyzer  Rhenium Filter  Calibration Curve
                          ug / cm  Pb





                  The  commonly  accepted value for excessive




lead in paint is  difficult  to  measure in situ, as the cor-




responding paint  thickness  is  undefined.  For this study,




the unit mg/cm2Pb was used  which corresponds to the measuring




geometry of the x-ray fluorescence detector.  The relation-




ship of paint thickness  and mg/cirf Pb corresponding to 1%




Pb is 1 to 4 mg/cm2Pb.   The instrumentation used had a  sen-




sitivity of + 0.1 to  0.3 mg/cm2pb.




                  Two  different painted surfaces, both in-




side and outside, of  the participants' homes were analyzed.
                            98

-------
Figure 26. X-Kay Fluorescence Anily/
                                      Lead Filter  Calibration Curve
                                           12.49
                                                           100
                           (i g I c m   P b
On the inside of  the  home,  measurements were taken in the




room closest to the street  such as a living room and, also,



in the child's bedroom if applicable.  The outside measure-



ments were taken  on either  the front door or door jamb  and



the garage door.   Condition of the painted surface analyzed



was noted as was  the  general condition of all painted sur-



faces in the home.  The exterior composition  (brick, siding,



etc.) was also noted.   Twice a day, usually in the morning



and afternoon, a  100%  Pb standard was analyzed.  This






                            99

-------
measurement gave a visual indication of the condition of




the instrument and also provided a decay factor for the




radioactive source.  All readings were subsequently ad-




justed to reflect the condition of the source at the time




of calibration.



           h.    Hand-Wipe Samples




                 Hand-wipe samples, which were collected




on "Wash 'N Dri" towelettes, were analyzed by the procedure




outlined above for windowsill wipe samples.




                 Hand-wipe samples from children were quan-




titated by the "method of additions" as described for the




water samples.  Figure 27 illustrates a typical analytical




curve for hand-wipe samples.  Quality controls for the hand-




wipes were also similar to those of the water samples.




           i.    Blood




                 (1)   Venous Blood




                       Development of_ Analytical Methodology




                       Several studies were performed to




determine what parameters would affect the Pb content of blood




samples collected in 10ml minimal Pb Vacutainers (sodium



heparin anticoagulant).




                       One important question which needed



addressing was whether the blood needed to be frozen, re-




frigerated or maintained at ambient temperatures between




collection and analysis.  Contact with several investiga-




tors  running large-scale blood-Pb screening programs indicated
                          100

-------
             Figure 27. Analytical Curve for Lead in Hand Wipes
        160,-
                                                  I
                2.5
                       5.0
                                    10.0
                                                15.0
they either  maintained the blood at ambient temperature



or refrigerated it for shipment.  Most investigators would



refrigerate  the blood once it  arrived at the  laboratory



and analyze  it within 3 to 5 days.
                             101

-------
                        When the study site shifted to

Dallas, plans were made such that blood samples collected

would be refrigerated  from the time of collection until

Pb analyses were performed.  Also these plans made provi-

sions for the blood-Pb determinations to be done within

24 hours of collection.

                        A set (3 vacutainers) of bovine blood

samples from the Center for Disease Control (CDC) Blood-Pb

evaluation program were analyzed in duplicate for Pb on

three different occasions over a period of 20 days.  The

blood was refrigerated during shipment (wet ice) from CDC

and maintained in a  cold room (40°C)  during the 20-day period.

Table 4 summarizes the data from this study.  The average

variation from the CDC Reference Lab value of the low Pb


          Table 4.  Effect of Refrigeration on Blood-Pb
            Values of  Whole Blood (CDC Bovine Blood)


        Sample   Day No. 1   Day No.  10  Day No.  20   Mean &
         ID    yg/100 ml   yg/100 ml   yg/100 ml    Std. Dev.
1 38.9
2 80.2
3 60.3
41.0
88.5
67.3
38.3
86.7
63.9
39.4 + 1.4
85.1 + 4.4
63.8 + 3.5
sample over 20 days was  14.7%  while the high Pb sample

varied only an average of  2.9%.   Refrigeration  (at 40°C)

of whole blood samples is  adequate protection to get accurate

blood-Pb concentrations  from venous   blood samples up to

20 days.
                            102

-------
                       Bovine blood samples from the CDC

program were collected in Vacutainers containing EDTA as


an anticoagulant whereas the Vacutainers used for this study


contained sodium heparin.  A comparison was made to deter-

mine if this would bias the blood-Pb data.  Freshly drawn

human blood was collected in both types of Vacutainers from

the same individuals at the same time.  Blood-Pb analysis


of these bloods indicated the Vacutainers containing the

EDTA gave results which were 21.9% lower than the blood

from the Vacutainer containing the sodium heparin.  Adding

    Q
CaCl  to the blood with EDTA gave blood-Pb values the same


as obtained from the sodium-heparin blood.

                       This effect of the anticoagulant

would not affect the venous blood-Pb data from the Dallas

study site since all samples were collected in Vacutainers

containing sodium heparin and the spiked bloods used to

quantitate these samples also contained sodium heparin.

                       Another study was performed to eval-

uate the effect different kinds of blood would have upon

the blood-Pb values.  The purpose here was to investigate

bovine blood as a source for spiking to quantitate the human

blood samples.  This would be less expensive than having

to purchase human blood for spiking standards.  Both bovine


and human blood samples were spiked with known amounts of

Pb to establish calibration curves  (concentration vs peak
                            103

-------
heights).   The slope  of the human  blood calibration curve

was 1.365  while the slope of the bovine blood  calibration

curve was  1.692.  This  represents  an approximate 24% dif-

ference  which favors  the human blood.   Therefore, it was

necessary  to match the  kind of blood used for  spiking stand-

ards with  the kind of blood being  analyzed for Pb.   All

venous blood samples  collected in  Dallas were  quantitated

using human blood purchased from a local blood bank.  All

CDC blood  samples were  quantitated using bovine blood (anti-

coagulant-EDTA)  purchased  from a local  veterinarian.

                         Table 5 gives the analytical para-

meters for venous blood using this methodology.

             Table 5. Analytical Parameters of Biological Samples
Sample Matrix
Sensitivity* '
Detection Limit'1'
Linear Range ' '
R ecovery (~> 1
Precision:
n
mean
std. dev.
RSD
Venous Bloodv '
0.5 fig/100 ml
1.4 fig/100 ml
80 fig/100 ml
101.0%

7
5.8 fig/100 ml
0.3 fig/100ml
5.2%
Capillary Blood1 '
1 .2 fig/100 ml
9.2 fig/100 ml
80 |j.g/100 ml
112.8%(6)

7
46.3 fig/100ml
4.6 fig/100ml
9.9%
Hand Wipes
0.11 ug
1.60 fig
12.5 fig
103.8%

6
9.21 fig
0.80 fig
8.7%
        (1) see text for definition
        (2)  does not imply maximum linear range
        (3)  0.5 ml of whole blood
        (4)  0.1 ml (100 fil) of whole blood
        (5)  based upon average recovery of low Pb spike in sample matrix
        (6)  recovery based upon CDC bovine blood analyzed over period of 11 days

                             104

-------
                       Analysis Procedures
                       Venous blood taken from the antecu-
bital vein of the participants was analyzed for Pb within
24 hours of collection.  The samples were refrigerated (but
not frozen) from collection until they were prepared for
Pb analysis in the laboratory-  Lead determinations were
performed on the blood from the unopened vacutainer (see
sample collection).  The blood from the other vacutainer
was transferred to a 30-cc polyethylene bottle and frozen
(0°C)  for future analysis if needed.
                       The method of blood-Pb determina-
tions used on the venous blood was patterned after that
of Hwang, Ullucci, and Mokeler,(17) and Kubasik and Volosin.
A 500yl aliquot of whole blood was pipetted from the 10-ml
vacutainer into a 5-ml screw-cap extraction tube.  Then,
500yl of Trizma buffer solution  (pH 7.0)  (Sigma Chemical
Co., St. Louis, Mo.) was added, followed by SOOyl of a
chelating-hemolyzing solution consisting of 2% ammonium
pyrrolidine-dithiocarbamate  (Aldrich Chemical Co., Milwaukee,
Wisconsin) in a 2% solution of Triton X-100 surfactant (J. T.
Baker Co., Phillipsburg, Pa.).
                       The sample was shaken to mix the
reagents and then allowed to stand 10 to 15 minutes to en-
sure complete hernolysis of the blood.  To extract the
chelated Pb, SOOyl of methyl isobutyl ketone  (Eastman Kodak,

                            105

-------
Rochester,  N.Y.)  was added and the sample vigorously shaken




for 5 minutes.   The sample was centrifuged for 10 minutes




at 2500 RPM and the organic layer removed for Pb determina-




tion by graphite furnace AAS.



                       Venous  blood-Pb concentrations were




determined by the "method of additions" using human blood




 (purchased from local blood bank) spiked at 3 or 4 different




levels with Pb standards.  From these spiked samples, an




analytical curve was calculated on a Hewlett-Packard 9810A




programmable calculator using a least-squares regression




program to obtain the best fit to the data points.  Figure




28 represents typical analytical curves for venous blood.




                       The unknown blood samples' Pb con-




centrations were determined using the slope of the analy-




tical curve and the peak height of the sample less the peak




height of the reagent blank.  After every 15 to 20 samples




were analyzed, a series of the spiked blood standards was




analyzed to allow a continuous upgrading of the analytical



curve.




                       Daily quality controls for the venous



blood samples were the spiked human blood used to establish




the analytical curve for Pb quantitation.  The Pb concentra-




tion of this human blood used for quality controls was veri-




fied against CDC bovine blood samples of known Pb content.
                           106

-------
           Figure 28.  Analytical Curve for Lead in Venous Blood
                -P
                ^
                tji
                •rH
                      160
                      140
1ZO
                      100
                       80
                       60
                       40
                       20
             5.5 |j.g/100 ml
           20
                  10
                                      _L
                         0     10     20

                         lag Pb/100 ml
                      30
                             40
                         In  summary, the extraction procedure

used for  Pb  determinations in venous blood  is relatively

simple procedure that requires a minimum  quantity of blood

and because  it is an extraction procedure avoids many of


the matrix interferences commonly associated with blood-Pb
                             107

-------
analysis.   The procedural steps are kept to a minimum thereby




avoiding contamination and improving the accuracy and pre-




cision of the data.



                       It is important that the same anti-




congulant is used on both the blood spiking standards and




the unknown blood samples.  Blood samples which contain




EDTA as the anticoagulant give lower blood-Pb values than




blood samples preserved with sodium heparin.  The reason




for the lower results with EDTA could be the ability of




the Pb to form complexes with the EDTA which would be more




favored than the pyrollidinedithiocarbamate complex used




to extract the Pb.




                       It is important to match the kind




 (species) of blood being analyzed for Pb with the spiked




blood used to quantitate it.  Extraction of bovine blood




and human blood showed a matrix effect which was not




compensated for by the extraction process.




                       The conditions which are used to pre-



serve the whole blood samples until they are analyzed




can affect the blood-Pb data.  The studies performed




to determine the best method of handling blood once it




was collected until  it was analyzed indicated that




refrigeration (40°c)  will maintain the blood in a condition




acceptable for blood-Pb analysis up to 20 days.  The var-




iation between duplicate blood samples collected from the




same individual over a two-week period will also give
                           108

-------
information as to the effectiveness of the preservation



technique and the analytical methodology used.  A large



variation between duplicates could be one indication that



the preservation method is not adequate since the normal



blood-Pb values would not be expected to vary over a very



wide range within a short period of time.  Microclotting



of the whole blood caused by inadequate preservation tech-



niques, would give highly variable results both on in-



dividual samples and on duplicates.  There were no signi-



ficant differences between the duplicate venous blood-Pb



values for the subjects in this study.



                       The studies undertaken prior to



collection and analyzing blood from the study participants



helped to eliminate some variables which might have other-



wise confounded the blood-Pb data and made it more difficult



to interpret.



                 (2)   Capillary Blood



                       Development of Analytical Methodology



                       Previous studies involving blood



collection from young children indicated an alternate, less



traumatic procedure should be available in those instances



where child and/or parent object to venous blood being taken.



                       There are a number of screening



methods based upon taking capillary blood by finger-prick


                                                       (19-22)
and analyzing by a microanalytical technique using AAS.x     '
                            109

-------
These methods have generally been for screening purposes




where blood-Pb concentrations below 40 ug/lOOml were not




quantitated.  Our purpose was to adapt one of these micro-




techniques to analyze blood with Pb concentration less than




30 ug/100ml.



                       After considering the different tech-




niques available for collecting the capillary blood for




Pb analysis, we decided the 100 yl capillary tubes would




provide the best method considering the field-sampling




and shipping conditions they would be exposed to.  Precal-




ibrated capillary tubes are now made specifically for blood-




Pb determinations, i.e., minimal Pb contamination.




                       The original methodology development




involved diluting the blood to 2.5 ml rather than to 5.0ml.




This dilution was not sufficient to reduce the matrix effect




caused by the blood.  At this dilution the background cor-




rector (D2arc) could not compensate for all the matrix in-




terferences present when the sample was atomized in the




graphite furnace.  Increasing the ashing temperature to




remove more of the matrix effect resulted in losses of Pb.




                       Increasing the dilution to 5ml im-



proved the data but there were still some matrix effects




not being corrected.  At this point a chemical solution




was tried since the instrument parameters (ashing tempera-




ture,  time,  etc.) had reached their maximum effect.  A






                           110

-------
"Keeper" element was introduced into the furnace with the



sample to retain the Pb at the higher ashing temperatures



of the furnace. A lOyl injection of a 50ppm Ni solution




placed on top of the sample injection allowed ashing tem-



perature of 600°C to 650°C without losses of Pb.   This ef-



fectively removed all matrix effects.



                       Since the capillary blood samples



would be taken by laboratory technicians without direct



supervision and under conditions unfamiliar to the technician,



the possibility of collecting more or less than the 100 yl



was considered.



                       By using the diameter of the capillary



tube and measuring the length of blood collected, the volume



of blood in the capillary tube could be determined.  To



determine if this was a valid assumption, capillary tubes



were fitted to various size Eppendorf pipets using a modi-



fied pipet tip.  Known quantities of CDC blood were drawn



into the capillaries.  The length of the blood in the cap-



illaries was measured and the blood was then analyzed by



the capillary blood procedure.  Table 6 gives the results



of this study.  The variation due to calculating the blood



volume ranged from 1.2% to -14.3%.  Most of the blood-Pb



values determined by calculating the volume of blood were



less than the CDC Reference Laboratories value for the blood.



All were within the +15% variation from the mean value




54.5 yg/100 ml).
                            Ill

-------
                Tablo 6.  Determining Blood Volume in Capillary
                      Tube by Indirect Measurement

Sample
ID
80-1
80-2
80-S
90-1
90-2
90-S
95-1
95-2
95-S
100-1
100-2
100-S
110-1
110-2
110-S
120-1
120-2
120-S



Measured
Volume
^
80
80

90
90

95
95

100
100

110
110

120
120

Total


Pb-Conc.
Length of Calculated
Blood, mm Volume, ul
47
47

53
53

57
57

59
58

65
66

71
71




.0
.5

.5
.5

.0
.0

.0
.5

.5
.0

.5
.0




78.
79.

89.
89.

95.
95.

98.
97.

109
110

119
118

Mean
SD
CV %
6823
5194

5639
5639

4232
4232

7714
9344

.653
.490

.698
.861




in Blood
|ig/100ml
51.
53.
52.
58.
52.
55.
47.
46.
46.
46.
46.
46.
50.
47.
49.
49.
52.
50.
50.
3.
6.
96
55
75
01
30
15
30
41
86
56
96
70
49
79
14
10
07
88
25
35
7%
% Difference
from Extract
Blood Value


-3.2%


+ 1.2%


-14.0%


-14.3%


-9.8%


-6.6%
-7.8%


                        As a precaution,  all capillary blood

samples were measured and the length  of  blood recorded

prior to  analysis.   Calculation of the blood-Pb values

using the measured  volume and 100 yl  did not change any

of the data  significantly.

                        Variations in  the instrument para-

meters were  determined to be a serious problem.  The degrading
                            112

-------
of the graphite  tube  seemed to be a constantly changing

parameter that would  affect the blood-Pb data if not com-

pensated for.  Analyzing spiked blood standards and CDC

bovine blood routinely with every 5 to 10 capillary blood

samples eliminated  this problem.  Table 7 summarizes the

results of the CDC  bovine blood analyzed as quality control

over a period of 8  consecutive days.
           Table 7-  CDC Bovine Blood as Quality Control for
                    Capillary B'cod-Pb Analysis
                                            Blood-Pb
         Number Days                        (xg/100ml

             0                                43.5

             1                                44.5

             2                                47.0

             3                                45.8

             4                                39.9

             5                                54.4

             6                                49.1

             7                                44.8

             mean                            46 .1
             st.dev.                            4.3
             RSD                              9.3%
                            113

-------
                       Analysis Procedures



                       Capillary blood taken by the finger-




prick technique was refrigerated from the time of collec-



tion until Pb analyses were performed in the laboratory.



At least one and in some cases two of the extra blood



capillary-tube samples were frozen for later Pb determina-



tion if the necessary information could not be obtained



from the capillary tube analyzed immediately upon receipt




at the laboratory.



                       Lead analysis of the capillary blood



samples was performed by a procedure similar to that of



Norral and Butler(23)using the graphite furnace technique



 (AAS) to improve sensitivity.  The micro-capillary tube



containing the blood sample was fitted to a modified pipet



tip attached to a 200-yl Eppendorf pipet  (Brinkman Instru-



ments, Inc., Westbury, N. Y.).  The blood was expelled from



the microcapillary tube by slowly depressing the pipet



plunger.  This blood was expelled into a 5-ml volumetric



flask containing 1.0 ml of 0.02% Triton X-100 solution.



The tip of the microcapillary tube was placed below the



surface of the X-100 solution while ejecting the blood



sample.  Then, approximately 100 to 150 yl of the X-100



was drawn into the capillary tube several times to rinse



all the blood into the vial.  Deionized water was used to



make the volume to 5ml and the sample was thoroughly mixed.
                           114

-------
Lead determination was made on this diluted blood sample



by injecting 20 yl into a preprogrammed graphite tube furnace



(IL 455 model) AAS, followed by lOyl of 50ppm Ni as described earlier.




                       Quantitation of the capillary blood



followed the same "method of additions" procedure outlined



above for venous blood.  Figure 29 represents a typical




analytical curve plotted out.




                       For capillary blood, the daily quality



controls were the spiked human blood used for quantitation



of the samples.  This human blood's Pb content was estab-



lished by comparison with CDC bovine blood-Pb samples of



known Pb concentration.



                       In summary, adapting a finger-prick



blood sampling procedure to quantitate blood-Pb in a non-



exposed population is subject to many hazards because of



the quantity of blood available to work with.  The extremely



small volume  (100 yl) of blood makes this methodology more



susceptible to contamination since the Pb levels analyzed



are in the ppb range.  Due to the absolute Pb concentration



analyzed and the increased possibility of contamination,



the data will be more variable than the venous blood procedure,



                       Using the very sensitive graphite




furnace AAS technique has allowed this micro method of blood-



Pb analysis to succeed.  Increases in the sophistication




of the commercially available heated graphite furnace units
                            115

-------
        Figure 29 .  Analytical Curve for Lead in Capillary Blood
            tn
            •H
            0)
            ffi


            •s
                   90 -
                   80
                   70
                   60
                   50



                  m m





                   40
                    30
                    20
                    10


           6. 0 jig/100 ml
        40      20      0      ZO     40



                      jig Pb/100 ml
60
       80
has moved  the finger-prick method of  blood-Pb analysis from



a semiquantitative procedure to a fully quantitative one.



This is  important in that recent evidence indicates children



may suffer from subacute Pb intoxication and not  have a
                             116

-------
blood-Pb level high enough to measure accurately by the



standard screening techniques.  For these children it is



critical to have a quantitative measure of their blood-Pb



concentrations which can be used to evaluate their treat-



ment programs.  Since most clinical laboratories are now



equipped with AAS, this makes the finger-prick technique



a rapid and economical means of monitoring these children.



                       Also for epidemiological studies



involving a blood-Pb monitoring the micromethod of analyzing



capillary blood is both economical and provides better


data with less trauma to the subjects being monitored.



                       Because commercial instrumentation



has developed to where ppb and ppt levels of metals can



be quantitated the general approach has been to dilute the


sample to where matrix effects are not a problem.  This
                                                     i

requires very careful collection techniques in taking blood



and also in preparing the sample to prevent excessive amounts


of contamination.  Recently, chemical methods have become



popular in reducing these matrix effects to avoid the hazards



associated with trying to analyze diluted samples in the



ppt range.


                       Studies using 50 ppm Ni solution



along with the sample aliquot in the graphite furnace have



illustrated the feasibility of this technique to retain



Pb while higher ashing temperature are used to remove
                            117

-------
matrix interferences.



                       Calculating the volume of blood by




actually measuring the length of blood in the capillary



tube provides a means of compensating for the collection



problem which may be encountered under field conditions.



Studies indicate this will provide accurate results even



when the actual quantity of blood taken is more or less




than lOOyl.



                  (3)   Hematocrits



                       Hematocrits were determined on all



blood samples at the time of collection (see Sample Collection).



Only one of the two 10ml vacutainers containing venous blood



was opened so an aliquot of blood could be taken for hem-



atocrit determination.  This vacutainer was marked so it



would not be used for the initial blood-Pb determination



at the laboratory.  It was retained  (frozen) as a reserve



sample.




                       A Clay-Adams hematocrit centrifuge



was used to spin the collected capillary blood tubes and



to measure their hematocrit value.




                  (4)   Free Erythrocyte Protoporphyrin



                       Blood samples from each participant



were analyzed for Free Erythrocyte Protoporphyrin  (FEP).



The method used was based on that described by Piomelli. (24) (25)
                           118

-------
                       Blood that was collected from the



participants was analyzed for FEP the day after collection.



The blood was allowed to come to room temperature before



pipeting 20yl into an acid-washed test tube.  While the



tube was agitated on a Vortex mixer, 50yl of a 5% "celite



in 0.9% saline solution was added.  Two milliliters of



a 4:1 ethyl acetate:acetic acid mixture was added and the



tube agitated for 10 seconds.  Following centrifugation



at 2500 RPM for 5 minutes, the supernatant was decanted



into a clean cuvette.  To the supernatant, 4 ml of 1.5N



HC1 was added, agitated, arid then allowed to stand in




a dark area for 30 minutes.  This allowed the HCl/ethyl



acetate interface to develop.  The ethyl acetate layer



was then aspirated with care so that none of the HCl layer



was removed.  The sample was then read in a filter fluoro-



meter  (Turner Model 430) with the excitation wave-length



set at 405 my and the emission wavelength at 610 my.



                       Preparation of a standard curve for



each run was based on the method of standard addition.



One participant s sample from each day's run was selected



and used for spiking.  Triplicates of 20* yl of blood were



pipetted into five sets of test tubes.  These represented



samples with no spike added  (the blank) and samples to which



50, 100, 150 and 200 yl of a 1 yg/ml coproporphyrin I



standard were added.  The spiking solution was added to
                            '-119

-------
the blood already in the tube as it was agitated.  The tubes




were covered and set aside for 1 hour.  After this setting




time, 50 yl of the celite solution was added.  The blank




and standards were then extracted and analyzed along with




the blood samples for that day.  The amount of FEP in the




samples was computed based on the factor obtained from the




least squares method, then corrected for the hematocrit




of the sample and reported as yg FEP/100 ml RBC.



                       The source for spiking the blood




was coproporphyrin I obtained from Sigma Chemical (COP-I-5).




To preweighed vials with 5 yg/vial, 5 ml of 1.5N HC1 was




added and then placed in a boiling water bath for 5 minutes.




The vial was removed from the bath and then placed in a




light-tight box to cool to room temperature.  The light-




sensitive contents were withdrawn as quickly as possible




and the remaining portion returned to the darkened area.




                       In addition to the other reagents




used, which had the highest purity obtainable, the ethyl




acetate used in this procedure was cleaned prior to use.




Approximately 500 ml of ethyl acetate was poured into a




separatory funnel.  To this approximately 200 ml of a 10




N NaOH solution was added and the two mixtures shaken for




about 5 minutes.  The NaOH was decanted and two deionized




water washes followed.  The cleaned ethyl acetate was then




stored in an acid washed brown bottle until used.
                           120

-------
                (5)   Carbon  Monoxide  In  the  Blood


                     The  determination of carbon monoxide  in  the


 blood was  performed  based on  a  modification of  the  method reported

                    i r~)f.\
 by  Collisorij  et  al.       Carbon monoxide was released  from


 the blood  sample by  the  addition of  sterox  and  potassium


 ferricyanide  into a  sample  loop previously  purged with helium


 carrier  gas.   The released  gases were then  swept onto  a


 molecular  sieve  column and  the  separated CO was then detected


 by  gas chromatography.


                 (6)   CDC Blood-Lead Proficiency
                       Testing  Program


                       Our laboratory began participating


in this evaluation program to verify  the accuracy of the


blood-lead extraction procedure  (venous blood)  used on


this study.


                       Each month, 3 bovine blood samples


were received in our laboratory  from CDC in Atlanta, Georgia.


The blood samples were to contain a low, high,  and medium


concentration of Pb obtained from cows fed various quanti-


ties of lead acetate with their  feed.  The medium Pb con-


centration of these samples was  to be approximately 40 yg


Pb/100 ml but this was actually  closer to the average low


concentration.  The Pb concentrations of the blood were


to be determined and reported by seven reference laboratories.


Other laboratories participating in the program would try

-------
to come within +15% of the reference laboratories'  reported




mean Pb concentrations of each sample.  Monthly  reports




were issued summarizing the results of  reference labora-




tories and participating laboratories.



                       All CDC bovine blood samples were




analyzed  for  Pb  using the procedure outlined earlier for




venous blood  and capillary blood  samples.



                       These bovine blood  samples were used




 to calibrate  the spiked blood used daily to quantitate




 the venous blood samples  (see venous blood analysis).




Also the  capillary blood samples  (finger-pricks) were




 quantitated  against these reference blood  samples on a




 daily basis  (see capillary blood  analysis).




      4.     Statistical Procedures




            The statistical  procedure was to characterize




the environment with respect to airborne lead in resi-




dential areas with traffic  densities  from less than  1000




to greater than 25,000 cars  per day,  and also to charac-




terize and compare differences,  if any,  in blood lead




levels among  people who  live  on these  streets.  The en-




vironmental  parameters that  were  measured for lead were




air,  soil, indoor and outdoor  dust, windowsill wipes,




and hand-wipes.   Lead in  tap water and  house paint was



also measured  and used as  a  screening variable.  The
                            122

-------
effects of traffic density, distance from street, inter-



sections, particle size, speed limits and shorter collec-



tion times were also considered.




            In general, the blood and environmental vari-



ables were tested either for differences among traffic



sites using analysis of variance  (ANOVA) or for a rela-



tionship with individual traffic counts using regression



analysis or, in some cases, using both methods.  When



ANOVA was used, the variables were assigned to one of four



traffic density sites: <1,000  (site 1); 1,000-13,500  (site



2); 13,500-19,500 (site 3); and >19,500 cars/day (site 4).



These traffic classes were slightly modified from the



more general classes discussed earlier to conform to



natural grouping in the traffic counts.  Histograms were



made for each variable and transformations were applied




if needed to meet the assumptions for the ANOVA.  In all



cases which were transformed, base 10 logarithms were used.



When the assumptions could not be met, nonparametric tests



were substituted.  The same methods were applied in the



smaller studies using t-tests, paired t-tests, and two-



way ANOVA or their nonparametric analogues.



            Regression analysis was used to define the



relationship of some variables to actual traffic counts
                            123

-------
over the range <1,000 to >25,000 cars/day.  Two procedures




were used in interpretation of the regression analyses:




scatter plots were examined and R2 (the amount of variation




in the dependent variable explained by the regression) was




evaluated.  Scatter plots of X and Y variables and residuals




were generated in each analysis and were examined for non-




linear relationships or possible transformations to improve




the fit.  When no transformations were suggested by the data,




and R2 was very small, further interpretation of the regres-




sion equation and the significance of the regression coef-




ficient was not attempted.




            The two blood lead measurements from each




participant were handled in two ways.  For the ANOVA, the




duplicate measurements were arranged in a two-way mixed




model design with Samples 1 and 2 as random effects and the




four traffic densities as fixed effects.  Variation between




Samples 1 and 2 was then evaluated for bias in every sampling




group and accurate estimates of the variances at each level




could be obtained.  The advantage of this method is that




the alternative (averaging the two blood samples) signifi-




cantly depressed the sample variance (P <0.001).  For the




regression analyses, however, the intuitively correct ap-




proached  is to pair a blood lead value for an individual




with the traffic count at his residence; therefore, the




average blood lead for each individual was used.
                            124

-------
            The raw data for all variables are listed in



the appendices  (D-I) or included in the text space  (for



the smaller studies).   Zeros were used when no measurable



lead could be detected.  Blanks were used when no data



was collected.




      5.    Participant Recruitment



            a.    General Approach



                  Volunteer participants who met a set



of age, occupation, race, sex, and residence requirements



were required for successful conduction of this study.  The



general approach to participant recruitment in this study



was through use of a house-to-house survey in which volun-



teer participants were recruited.  A household survey form




was designed for use in the survey which solicited infor-



mation regarding health and other characteristics of house-



holds along the selected streets.  The household health



questionnaire also served to determine if one or more



members of a candidate household were eligible for inclu-



sion in the study as volunteers.



                  To obtain background information on per-



sons determined to be eligible for the study, a second



portion of the household survey form was designed.  With



this individual questionnaire, information regarding per-



tinent characteristics of the individual was obtained for



later use in selecting study participants from those indiv-



duals volunteering for the study and completing an individual
                            125

-------
questionnaire.

                  The household surveys, including adminis-

tration of the  individual questionnaires, were performed

by survey workers going house-to-house along streets se-

lected for study by the project team.   The procedure in-

corporated at each doorway included the following:

      •     approach doorway of house, ring doorbell
            or  knock

      •     survey worker introduces self and explains
            survey

      •     concept of a public health survey regarding
            traffic-produced lead is stressed

      •     permission to administer household survey
            is  determined

      •     household questionnaire is administered

      •     eligibility of members of household is
            determined

      •     if  no member is eligible,  survey worker
            thanks resident for information

      •     if  one or more member is eligible, survey
            worker determines if any would offer their
            services as paid volunteers and explains
            payment for biological samples

      •     individual questionnaire is administered
            to  persons who volunteer

      •     volunteers are told they will be notified,
            if  selected, and arrangements will be made
            for sample collection

      •     volunteer families are provided copy of
            information sheet on study  (shown in Figure
            30) .

      •     survey worker thanks resident for information
                            126

-------
                 Figure 30.
                      GENERAL INFORMATION FOR PARTICIPANTS OF
                          TRAFFIC LEAD PUBLIC  HEALTH SURVEY
        This public health survey is being conducted by Southwest Research Institute for
        the Environmental Protection Agency.  The object of this  survey is to determine
        if residents living near heavily trafficked streets are exposed to undue amounts
        of lead.  The health survey will be conducted in three stages.  The first is a
        house-to-house survey of selected residences, using a questionnaire form approved
        by the  EPA and specifically designed for use on this study.  The second stage in-
        volves collection of  water,  soil,  and dust samples from residences and blood sam-
        ples from individuals who volunteer to participate in the survey.  All participants
        who provide samples to the study will be paid $25 for their services.  In the third
        stage,  air samples will be  taken in the  vicinity of residences and traffic will be
        counted.

        As a volunteer paid  participant,  the following samples  will be collected:

        From Residence                         From  Participant
        Soil sample(one cup)                     Questionnaire form
        Water  sample(one cup)                   Consent form
        Dust sample (window sill wipe)            Handwipe from children
        Dust sample! srrvt.ll tray)                  Two blood samples
        Examination of sar:ace inside and           -One week apart
          outside of house for lead                   -Venipuncture  for  adults
                                                  -Finger prick for  small children

        Each Participant %vill receive:

        (1) Results of screening for lead in paint surfaces of their residence
        (2) Summary of results of the overall survey
        (3) Direct information if any abnormal blood lead levels are indicated in the
            participant
        (-<) S25 paid to each  participant for their help

        Schedule of Activities

        (1) You will receive a  letter to notify you of your1  selection as a  participant

        (2) You will be called to confirm your selection and to  schedule  a visit of the
            study team

        (3) The study team will visit your home three times to  collect samples  and to pay
            you for your participation

        (4) You will receive a  letter indicating study results and thanking you for your
            help in this important study.
                  b.      Eligibility  Requirements

                          Participant  eligibility requirements may

be  summarized  as  follows:

         •        persons  who  live in  residences  on streets
                  selected  for  study
                                         127

-------
      •     residence at address for 6 months or more

      •     normal occupation does not take individual
            away from residence

      •     preschool children (males & females-toddler
            or older) females who work at home (ages
            20-49) older persons (males & females-ages
            50+)

In addition, only persons who are white, non-Spanish, were

to be selected as participants in the study.  To optimize

the recruitment efforts required to solicit participants

meeting all requirements, streets were selected for use

in this study which census data indicate are 70% or more

white, non-Spanish.  In the recruitment activities, no

effort was made at the survey worker level to bias the

number of volunteers racially, i.e. all races were accepted

as eligible volunteers.  Only persons meeting all require-

ments, including race, were later selected as participants

for collection of biological samples.

                  The distinction regarding persons eligible,

volunteers, and participants should be noted at this time.

Persons are regarded as eligible for the study if study

criteria regarding age, occupation, sex, ethnic background,

and residence are met.  Eligible persons who volunteer

are termed volunteers.  From those who volunteered, a set

of participants was selected and biological samples were

collected from these participants.  In the study recruit-

ment activities, volunteers were sought without reference

to the ethnic requirement (white, non-Spanish); i.e. persons
                            128

-------
of all races were recruited as volunteers.  From those

who volunteered, only persons who met all requirements,

including ethnic, were selected as participants.  Partici-

pants who delivered all required biological samples to

the study team were each given $25 as compensation.  The

$25 is intended as partial compensation for the services

these participants provided to the public health survey.

This compensation provides an additional incentive for

persons who would be interested in serving the study, but

who otherwise might "let his neighbor" be bothered with

giving blood samples and other samples.

            c.    First Stage of Household Surveys

                  In the first stage of survey activities,

20 survey workers were hired, trained, and released to

perform surveys.  The assignment for each worker consisted

of a designated street (or streets) between two specified

intersections.  The worker was provided with an estimate

of the number of qualified residences in his assignment and

he was given strict criteria for the residences qualified

for survey:

      •     single family dwellings or duplexes

      •     within ]QO feet of roadway

      •     no houses within 100 yards of traffic
            signal or stop sign

      •     no corner houses

      •     only houses which face roadway.
                             129

-------
                  The design criteria for this study was




based on a compensation of $15 to participants selected




for sample collection.  As per the design criteria, the




survey workers made this offer to eligible persons in their




efforts to recruit them as volunteers.



                  After completion of nearly 1,000 house-




hold surveys, it became apparent that the design estimate




of one participant for every two households was incorrect.




The actual results were closer to one qualified participant




for every four households.  Examination of the possible




alternatives indicated that a second stage of survey activi-




ties would be required, and that some changes in techniques




would be necessary if the survey was to be a success inso-




far as recruitment of volunteers was concerned,




            d.    Second Stage of Household Surveys




                  A second stage of survey activities was




designed to increase the success rate of volunteer recruit-




ment.  For the higher traffic density levels, an immedi-




ate problem was seen:  most of the available residences




in Sites 3 and 4 had been surveyed in the first stage of




activities.   In order to perform additional surveys, addi-




tional qualified residences would be required.  To this




purpose, it was proposed that the restrictions regarding




usage of corner houses and only houses facing the main




roadways be lifted.  The Project Officer agreed to the




lifting of these restrictions and thereby provided a sig-
                            130

-------
nificant new set of residences qualified for survey in



Sites 3 and 4.




                  Because the percentage of volunteers



per those eligible was viewed to be lower than expected




in the first stage of recruitment activities, additional



incentives were introduced for both the survey worker and



the candidate volunteers.  The amount paid to each survey



worker in the stage two activities was raised to $5.00



for each complete participant form delivered to the coor-



dinator.  Additionally, the amount offered to the volunteer



for compensation (if selected as a participant)  was raised



from the design value of $15 to the amount of $25 for



each study participant providing a complete set of samples



for the study.



                  The method of assignment of survey areas



to each survey worker was also changed.  A complete list



of addresses of qualified residences was compiled by driving




through all remaining candidate areas.  Each survey worker



was given a specific set of approximately 60 addresses of



qualified residences.  Fifteen survey workers were recruited



and trained for the second set of survey activities and



were each given the assignment of 60 addresses.   The neces-




sity for recruitment of preschool children was stressed to



the workers since the first stage of survey activities had



failed in this one group.  When qualified preschoolers were
                            131

-------
determined to be present at a residence, the survey workers

were asked to be particularly persuasive in recruiting that

family as volunteers.

                  Two additional techniques were introduced

in the second stage of survey activities to increase the

success rate regarding recruitment of volunteers.  A letter

designed to introduce the survey worker was placed in the

doorway of residences on a day preceding the actual survey-

ing of the household.  A copy of the letter, signed by the

Project Director, is shown in Figure 31.  Analysis of reactions

to the household survey form revealed negative feelings regarding

whether or not anyone was at home during daytime hours, as

though they were worried about potential theft.  Due to this

noticed uneasiness regarding the form, the sequencing of

questions was rearranged so that Questions 2 and 3 regarding

routine of spending time at home or away from home were

asked later in the interview.  Also, a brief set of opinion

questions were introduced in a sampling of cases to determine

if these could soften the questionnaire and generate more

response in those being interviewed.  Questions on the sample

opinion survey included the following:

      1.    Have you received a letter recently informing
            you about a public health survey?

      2.    Are you concerned about air pollution in your
            neighborhood?

      3.    Are you aware that automobile exhaust often
            contains lead?
                            132

-------
               Figure  31.  LETTER OF INTRODUCTION

   SOUTHWEST  RESEARCH  INSTITUTE
   8500 CULEBBA  HOAO  •  POST OFFICE  OHAWEB 28510  .  SAN ANTONIO TEXAS 7328J

                             May 17, 1976
      As you may know, the Environmental Protection Agency is
conducting a public health survey in the Dallas Metro Area.  This
survey is being performed by Southwest Research Institute with
the help of the Center for Urban and Environmental Studies at SMU.
The subject of the survey is air pollution resulting from automobile
traffic. As you are probably aware, automobile exhaust often con-
tains lead.  The object of the study is to determine if undue amounts
of lead are present in residents living near heavily trafficked streets.

      We need your help to accomplish this survey.  A member of
our survey team will be contacting you in the next few days to ask
you a. few questions about air pollution in your neighborhood and to
discuss our health study.

      Interested persons can participate as paid volunteers to aid
the study.  Each participant will be paid $25 for providing blood sam-
ples and samples of water, soil, and dust from their homes.  In
addition, air in the vicinity of participating homes will be sampled
and analyzed for the presence of pollutants.

      Please remember that public health surveys can only be accom-
plished with the help  of interested citizens  such as yourself.   You can
help us determine the pollution  level in your neighborhood.  Our inter-
viewer will be contacting you in a few days.  If you would like to con-
tact us, call Linda Johnson at SMU, 692-2532.

                                    Sincerely,
                                    Dr. Donald E. Johnson
             ANTONIO, HOUSTON, CORPUS CHRISTI, T £ x A S . AND WASHINGTON. O.C
                           133

-------
            Which of the following places do you consider
            air pollution to be more of a problem for you
            and your family:

            a)    In the vicinity  of your home?
            b)    Away from your home,  i.e., work, while
                  shopping, driving, etc.?

            For which age group do you  consider air pollu-
            tion to be more of a problem:
            a)
            b)
            c)
Children?
Adults?
Older?
The sample opinion surveys were  introduced at the beginning

of the survey for approximately  200  residences.   The accep-

tance rate of the survey workers was viewed to be much

higher by the survey workers involved with the sample

opinion survey.  Results of the  sample  survey are shown

in Table 8.

        Table 8. Sample Opinion Survey  re Air Pollution Concern
           1.   Received Letter:


           2.   Concerned:


           3 .   Aware of Lead:


           4.   More Problem:


           5 .   Problem Group:
             Yes
             No

             Yes
             No

             Yes
             No

             Home
             Away

             Children
             Adults
             Older
% Total

 71
 29

 76
 24

 93
  7

 48
 52

 44
 14
 42
                            134

-------
                  Survey activities were continued by



repeatedly going into areas already surveyed to work the



few residences not reached during earlier rounds.  The



survey activities were terminated when the resulting number



of qualified participants was approximately equal to the



redefined criteria of 40 participants per category.



            e.    Informed Consent



                  The use of individuals as participants



in a public health study such as that described here re-



quires the complete disclosure of information regarding



the objective of the study, the use of individuals for



provision of study samples, and any risks or potential



of harm, if any, to the individuals as a result of their



participation in the study.  An Informed Consent form



was specially designed for use in the study and is present




in Figure 32.



                  During the initial visit to the resi-



dence of each participant, the details of the study and



any risks to the participant were explained.   The Informed



Consent form was provided and a signature was obtained




before initiation of sample collection.
                            135

-------
           32.   Volunteer's Informal Consent

     SOUTHWEST  RESEARCH   INSTITUTE
               CULEBRA ROAD        SAN ANTDNlO, TEXAS 78228
                 VOLUNTEER'S INFORMED CONSENT
I,  	
residing at
hereby acknowledge and certify to the following:

      i.    That I hereby volunteer and consent to participate as a human
test  subject in an experiment identified as 'Epidemiologic  Study of the
Effects of Exposure to Automobile Traffic on the Blood Lead Levels of
Persons  in Selected Age  Groups' which is designed to determine the extent
of exposure to environmental pollutants.

      Z.    That I have been given, in my opinion,  an adequate explanation
of the nature,  duration and purpose of the experiment,  the means by which
the experiment will be conducted and any possible inconveniences, hazards,
discomforts, risks, and adverse effects on my health which could result
from my participation therein;

      3.    That I have been informed of all appropriate alternative procedures,
if any exist, that  might be advantageous to me;

      4.    That I understand my questions concerning  procedures which
affect me will be  answered fully and promptly;

      5.    That I understand that I have the  right to  withdraw my consent
and to discontinue participation in this experiment at any time without prejudice
regardless of the status of the experiment and regardless  of the  effect of such
withdrawal on the objectives and results which the experiment is designed to
achieve;  and I also understand that my participation in the experiment may
be terminated at any time by the investigator in charge of  the project or
the physician supervising the project regardless of my  wishes to the matter;

      6.    That I hereby understand and agree  that the  samples collected
from me will be analyzed for lead, FEP,  hematocrit and carbon monoxide
and that these are the only tests that will be made on these samples and
that  no medicinal compounds will be analysed.
                                 136

-------
     Figure  32.   Volunteer's Informed Consent (cont'd)
      7.    That I attained the age of	years on my last birthday
which was	^^^^	,  and that I
am executing this  Volunteer's Informed Consent as my free act and deed.

           Executed	                          , 19
                                                Volunteer
                                    Signature of Person Informing Volunteer
                                    and Obtaining Volunteer's Consent

Executed in the presence of:



        Signature of Witness


(If volunteer is a minor,  parent or guardian must  complete the following.)

On behalf of	, I hereby
                   (insert volunteer's name)
consent to and approve his/her executing the foregoing consent and participating
in the above-identified experiment as a human test subject.
                                       Signature of Parent/Guardian

                                    Date: .
Executed in the presence of:
       Signature of Witness
                                   137

-------
                    III.  RESULTS

A.   Determination of the Relationship Between Air
     Lead  Levels and Traffic Flow Characteristics"

     1.     Results of Traffic Density Mini-study

            The objective of this study was to examine the

relationship  of air lead to traffic counts.  Air  lead was

measured concurrently with traffic counts for several 24-

hour periods  at each of 17 locations.  These locations were

selected to cover the range of  less than 1,000 to greater

than 25,000 cars per day.  The  air lead concentrations and

traffic counts obtained are presented in Table 9.   For

purposes of comparison and analysis, the data are also grouped

into four  traffic densities and the mean, standard error

(SE), and  number of days of observation  (sample size) are shown.
                        Table 9. Mean Air Lead Concentrations and Traffic Counts at
                             each Location and Traffic Density.
                Air Pb
                Mean 1 SE *
                                  Days
M>rli,e
• oat.! Mcaa
Mlm.,,-1
Bai IIL- a M ridge
UlulltieW
Miduiv KillM
1'rj.rie Creek
Gates
Inwood
Lo^urs Lane
Moukin^bl rd
Royal
Forest
Jim Miller
Marsh
Coit
N. \V. llvfcy.
Sue 1 1, 000
Site 2 1, 000
Site 3 1 3, 500
Site 4 -19. 500
0. 53
0. hO
0.89
0. 63
1. 07
1. 09
0.83
0. 91
1. 21
1. 48
1.20
1. 10
0. 93
0..15
1.10
1.25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1 . 8b 0.
cars /day
- 13, 500 cars
073
099
103
097
131
109
145
1 10
1 14

1 30
21 3
104
111
097
313
228

/day



3
5
7
9
10
14
16
17
17,
17
18,
20,
23,
37,


117 -•
31o -
)7I •
578 1
24t>±
1Z9 1
340 I
761 '-
480 t
128
042 •-
102 !
740 I
004-'
001 J
311 =
531 !


7
4
10
257
51 D
295
433
509
1245

1182
1912
LOI4
343
841
2175
1042


10
7 Site l«
8
9
7
7 Site 2
8
16
1 1
1
8
7 "
9
9
10
6 Site 4
19
All Sites

- 19. 500 cars/day
cars/day





Air Pb
Mean *SE
                                              u. 67 • 0.059
                                              0. 89 t Q. 058
Mean Traffu
 Level
                                              1.07 * 0.060     16,737
                                              1. 54 ! 0. 148     30, 1)85
                                              1. 06 r 0. 049
      ** Standard Error
            The  data for mean air  lead vs mean  traffic count

for each  location has been plotted and is shown  in Figure 33,

Over all  sites,  the mean air lead was 1.06 yg/m3  and the


                             138

-------
mean  traffic count was  17,330 cars per  day.   The mean air

lead  vs  mean traffic  density is also plotted for the four

traffic  density sites.   An apparent relationship between

traffic  density and air lead is readily detected in Figure  33
            ri qure 33.
   Hit
  '.EAD
  LEVEL
  u9/m3)
                    AIR LEAD LLVELS BY TRAFFIC COUNT
                                         r»0.65911 to.0263 X

                                         • = mean for each street


                                         A= mean for each traffic site
                     12    Lfi    20     24     2B

                      Traffic Density (thousand cars/day)
A total  of  152 air lead measurements with corresponding

traffic  counts were taken  and are listed in Appendix D.

Using the method proposed  by Mickey et al.,'   '  outlier

cases were  tested with regression analysis.   One outlier

(4.93 yg/m3  - NW Hwy.) was rejected with the  result that

the variable air lead was  normally distributed (with outlier

included, skewness = 2.38,  P = 0.02; without  outlier,

skewness =  1.20, P = 0.23).   The frequency distribution

of the variable air lead is  given in Figure 34.   Airlead
                             139

-------
     Figure 34.  Frequency Distribution of the Variable Air Lead.
                        ANl) COM'-MllAriOfr, iVHICI' FOLLOW EXCLUDE VALUES LISTED AHOVE
    '•1 10POINTS
       >. 1W>
       '•). AIM)
       ?. "550)
       2. 4iH1) **
       2.25PO**
       2. UH1) **
       I . 9W)***
       I . Tjiid) «•**
       I . 6Sfl) * ********
       I . Si)H) ********
       I .3c>Pi) **********
       I .2iHM **************
       I. )S0)'1 **************
       .}. '•'Cl^) * ** * ***********************
       H. 750) ******* *********
       }. V]0) * ******* **********
       •1. 1')P)) *** ***** ****
       'I. 3l)PI) *******
       •I. I 50)*
       .). -.111(1)*
      -'). I "id)
     ;>;om> MHANS ART lya-ioiTD w »."s  ir IIIPY COINCID^ rnni *'s, N's o-

               i . -;i M
               !' . 4 ? 7
    (J) The values 4.93 and 3 . 56 were excluded so that narrower class intervals could be used.




values  were regressed  on  traffic  counts  with  the  result

that  32.3% of the  variation in air  lead  was explained.

The regression equation given below was  significant  at

P  = 1.2  x 10"11.

                      Y  = 0.6598 + 0.0263X

where

                      X  = 24-hour  traffic count/1,000

and

                      Y  =   air  lead  (yg/m3)
                                   140

-------
Examination of scatter plots of X and Y and residuals also




indicated that the variable air lead was normally distri-




buted and independent.




           Further examination of the scatter diagrams in-




dicated that most of the increase of Y(air lead) with X




(traffic count) was in the 30,000 to 40,000 cars/day range.




To verify this, air lead was regressed on traffic counts/




1,000 with the highest location (NW Hwy.) omitted. This




location included almost all of the traffic counts above




30,000 cars/day.  The result was that only 15.1% of the




variation in air lead was explained.  The regression equa-




tion for air lead at these traffic densities was Y = 0.7059




+ 0.0214X.  There could be a nonlinear relationship, but




the range of traffic counts prohibits its estimation (i.e.,




plots do not give any suggested transformation).




           Conclusions:  We conclude that on streets with




traffic densities less than 25,000 cars/day, there is a




small but significant relationship between air  lead and




traffic counts.  Furthermore, as soon as traffic levels




are increased to the range of 30,000 to 40,000  cars/day,




the relationship improves markedly-  The relationship is




estimated by the equation Y = 0.6598 + 0.263X,  where X is




thousands of cars per day and Y is air lead,  (yg/m3).




     2.     Results of Replicate Hi-vol Mini-study




           The objective of this study was to determine the
                            141

-------
reproducibility of  air sampling data  from replicate samples,

For this purpose, replicate air samples  were taken each

day for 10 days at  one location (NW Hwy)  by placing two

air samplers side by  side for the 24-hour period.  The lead

concentrations of the 10 pairs of samples,  their means,

and standard errors are listed below.  The  air lead levels

for the replicates  on each day are shown in Figure 35.
      AIR
     LEAD
    LtVELS
         3.0
         2.0
         1.0
                      FIGURE 35.  REPLICATE AIR SAMPLERS
                 2     3     4     5     6     7     8

                               DAY MUHDER
in
                            142

-------
A paired comparisons t-test showed that there was no sig-

nificant difference between lead concentrations in the two

air samples taken each day  (t = 0.73, P = 0.48); however,

there was considerable variation over days for each air

sampler. This can be explained by the fact that these samples

include the outlier value  (4.93 yg/m3) discussed in the

traffic density mini-study above. Means and standard errors

were calculated omitting the outlier and its replicate with

the result that the standard errors were similar to those

in Table 13.  The standard deviation divided by the mean

or coefficient of variation  (CV) which is a relative

measure of variation was calculated for these two sets

of samples as well as for the sixteen locations in Table

13 (one location had only one sample).  The CV's ranged

from 0.26 to 0.61 and these two samples had midrange CV

values  (0.41 and 0.43).  Using a paired t-test the air

samples from the remaining nine days were also not signi-

ficantly different  (t = 0.13, P = 0.90).

                    Air Lead  (yg/m3)

           Air Sampler 1              Air Sampler 2

                *4.93                     4.11
                 2.33                     2.42
                 2.06                     2.09
                 3.56                     3.35
                 1.51                     1.26
                 1.91                     1-55
                 2.32                     2.38
                 0.93                     1.09
                 0.82                     0.92
                 1.89                     2.30
                            143

-------
     Mean ±  SE  2.23 ±0.388      2.15 ± 0.320




     N           10               10




     **Mean ±SE  1.93±0.262       1.93±0.274




                 9                 9




 * - Outlier (P «0.001)




** = Outlier excluded







      3.    Results of Particle Size Mini-study




            The proportion of lead particles which are in




the respirable range in suspended air lead at heights above




the ground breathable by adults and children is important to




the relationship between blood lead and an airborne lead




source.  It has been estimated that one-half to two-thirds




of particulate lead emissions are in the respirable range




(0.1 y to 0.5 y) ,   (-*) an(j that a density decline gradient




in airborne lead concentration exists up to 200 feet from




a highway.(•   Using <1.0 y as the upper size limit for




respirable particles, analyses were made to determine the




proportion of suspended lead measured 1 meter above the




ground in each of five particle size classes; whether these




proportions changed over distances of 5 feet (1.5m), 25 feet




(7.6ra), 50 feet (15m), and 100 feet (30m) from the street;




and the density decline gradient, if any, in respirable and




non-respirable size ranges.  This study was made in two




cities  (San Antonio, Texas and Dallas, Texas) on streets




selected to have traffic densities of approximately 25,000




cars/day.   Both sets of data are presented in Tables 10 and  11
                           144

-------
           Table 10 shows the air lead  concentrations

in each particle size class for one air sample taken at each of

five distances  from the street in San Antonio.   The upper half

of the table  shows  the lead concentrations  (yg/m3), and

the lower half  shows the lead concentration expressed

as a proportion of  the whole sample.  The proportions in

each size class remain approximately the same as the distance

from the street increases.  Approximately 50% of the lead

in the sample is in the respirable range regardless of the

distance from the street.  The proportion of lead in each

fraction vs.  distance from the street is plotted in Figure 36.
             Table 10- Lead Concentration (Ug/ma) in Five Particle Size
          Ranges at Four Distances from the Street

          San Antonio, Texas
Distance
(Feet)
5
25
50
100

5
25
50
100
Mean
SE
>
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
7. 0
8175
4417
2882
612Q
3
0
0
0
0
roportion
185
101
153
244
171
0299
0
0
0
0
0
0
Particle Size (u)
.3-6.9 2.0-3.2
. 5216
.6624
. 1939
. 2749
of Lead
. 118
. 152
. 103
. 110
. 121
. 0109
0
0
0
0
in
0
0
0
0
0
0
. 4664
. 4053
.2830
. 2142
Each Size
. 106
. 094
. 151
. 085
. 109
. 0146
1.
0.
0.
0
0.
0-1. 9
3360
3112
1 123
2479
<
2
2.
1.
1.
1. 0
2775
5472
0003
1593
Total
4. 4190
4. 3718
1. 8777
2. 5092
Range
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
076
071
060
099
077
0082
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
515
583
533
462
523
0250
1. 000
1. 001
1. 000
1. 000
	
                            145

-------
                           FIGURE 36
              PROPORTION OF TOTAL LEAD FOU!!D IN EACH PARTICLE SIZE FRACTION
                         vs. DISTANCE FROr< STREET
            .4-
   Proportion of
   Lead in Eacii
   Particle Size
   Range
            .3
                5       25        50


                   DISTANCE FROM STREET (Feet)
                                                    >7.n
                                                    3.3-6.P
                                                    1.0-1 .9
                                                    2.0-3.3
ion
Table  11 shows the  same information from the  Dallas  study.

The  two filters from the  respirable range at  50 and  100

feet were lost and  the results  for the  distances  5  feet

and  25 feet  are given. Again, more than half  of the  lead

is in  the respirable range with the remainder distributed
                               146

-------
            Table 11- Lead Concentration (L'g/m3) and Proportion in
        Five Particle Size Ranges at Four Distances from the Street.
        Dallas, Texas
        Distance
        (Feet)
         5

        25

        50

        100
                >7. 0
           Particle Sizes (u)

       3.3^7.0  3.0-3.2  1.0-1.9  <1. 0
0.2224   0.2073  0.1295

0. 1290   0. 0999  0. 0707

0. 1163   0. 1074  0.0667

0.0871   0.1147  0.0382
                                                     Total
0.1209   0.5461   1.2262

0.0811   1.6987   2.0794

0.0646   	

0.0616
                Proportion of Lead in Each Size Range
5
25
50
100
Mean
0.
0.


0.
181
062


122
0.
0.


0.
169
048


109
0. 106
0. 034


0. 070
0.099 0.445
0.039 0.817


0. 069 0631
1. 000
1. 000



among  the other four size classes.   The total  air lead

concentrations  vs. distance from  street for  San Antonio

and Dallas are  plotted  in Figure  37.

            In Table 12,  the lead  concentrations at each

distance are expressed  as the percentage of  the lead con-

centration at 5 feet from the street for the nonrespirable

and respirable  size ranges.  There  is no perceptible decline

in the first 25 feet; in fact, the  Dallas sample at 25  feet

had a  higher lead concentration.   (This variation is not

unexpected in a sample  size of two.)   At 50  feet and beyond,

the lead concentration  drops to approximately  one-half  the
                              147

-------
Ai r lead
                             FIGURE 37
             A:R LEAD C;'!.':CE:ITRATIO;:  vs. nirT/>'!CE  FPW  STREET
                             'Dallas
                                                            _  — - ~"ran Antonio
                         25            50

                        DISTANCE FROM STREET (Feet)
TOO
              Table  12. Concentration of Lead Suspended in Air at Increasing
            Distances Expressed at % of Lead at 5 Ft.  from Street.
                              i 1. 0 u             < 1. 0 U
           Distance (Ft. )      Nonres pirable Pb   Respirable Pb
Total Pb
San Antonio
5
Z5
50
100
Dallas
5
25
50
100

100%
85. 2
41. 0
63. 0

100%
56. 0
52.2
44. 3

100% 100%
111.8 98. 9
43.9 42.5
50.9 56.8

100% 100%
311.1 169.6
---
	 	
                                      148

-------
concentration at 5 feet and is fairly consistent at this




level in these three samples.




            Conclusions:  Approximately 50% of the airborne




lead concentration is in the respirable range  (< 1.0 y)




at distances from 5-100 feet from the street.  In the non-




respirable and respirable ranges, lead concentrations did




not decline in the first 25 feet from the street but were




approximately one-half the street level at 50 feet and




at 100 feet.




      4.     Results of Distance from Road Mini-study




            In the previous section, a density decline




gradient in air lead concentrations at distances up to




200 feet from the street was discussed.   Air samples and




traffic counts were taken for two days at three traffic




densities at four distances from the street: 5 feet (1.5m),




25 feet (7.6m), 50 feet (15m), and 100 feet (30m).   The




air lead concentrations in yg/m , and also expressed as




a percentage of the air lead at 5 feet from the street,




are given in Table 13.  At every traffic locality there




is a decline in air lead concentration with increasing




distance from the street.  Air lead levels vs distance




from street for each locality are plotted in Figure 38.




The decline seems to be more rapid at the higher traffic




counts (32, 761 and 34, 645), but the sample size for




this study is not large enough to make general statements




regarding decline rate and air lead levels.
                            149

-------
Distance
(Feet) Actual Traffic Counts (Cars/Da^
5
25
50
TOO
9360 '1538
2.15 1. 04
1.35 0. 86
1.17 0. 59
0.74
16, 886
1. 38
1.65
1.22
0. 47
18,
1
1
1
0
1Z3
. 82
. 37
. 02
.99
       Table 13. Concentration of Lead Suspended in Air (Ug/ma at Four
     Distances from the Street for Two Days at Three Traffic Densities.
                                            I, 761   34,645

                                            3. 24    3. 14

                                            1. 48    1. 85

                                            1.22    1.46

                                            1.09    1.02
         Concentration of Lead Suspended in Air Expressed as the
     Percentage of Lead at 5 Ft. From Street

                    Actual Traffic Counts (Cars/Day)
       5

      25

      50

     100
rapidly in the first 50 feet  from the  street to  levels of

about  55% of the  street concentration.   At 100 feet from

the street, the lead levels were less  than 40% of the

concentration at  the street.

     5.     Results  of Intersection Mini-Study

            Two different intersection  studies were done.

The first study measured air  lead for  four days  at each

of five combinations of block and intersecting street  traffic

densities:  10,000/1,000;  10,000/5,000;  15,000/1,000;
                              150
9360 9588
100% 100%
62.8 82.7
54.4 56.7
34.4
Conclusions :
16, 886 18, 123
100% 100%
119.6 75.3
88.4 56.0
34. 1 54. 4
32,761 34645
100% 100%
45.7 58.9
37.7 .46.5
33.6 32.5
Ave. %
100%
74. 2%
56.6%
37.8%
Air lead concentration declines

-------
     A1r Laad
     Concentration
     (up/n-3)
              1-
                                    38
                     AIR LEAP CONCENTRATION-: AS f FU?!CTIP»! "F DISTANCE
                           FROM P.OAf AMD TRAFFTC OFNSTTY
                                 3.588
                                                  16,886
                       25       50

                              DISTANCE FROM ROAD (FEET)
100
25,000/5,000; ana 25,000/10,000 cars/day.   The purpose  of

this study was to determine whether  air lead levels were

higher  at intersections  than at neighboring midblock  loca-

tions.   The intersecting streets were  selected to add from

1,000 to 10,000 cars/day to the midblock traffic levels.

At the  time this study was designed, we did not expect  to

recruit participants  for human studies from homes near

intersections.

            The second study was designed when it

became  necessary to recruit participants from corner  homes

(discussed in Section III B 1).  The purpose of this  study
                             151

-------
was to determine whether those participants who  lived near




1,000 car/day  intersecting streets were exposed  to  addi-




tional air lead.   Four traffic density combinations were




used: 1,000/1,000;  10,000/1,000; 15,000/1,000; and  25,000/




1,000 cars/day-  For  clarity, we will refer to this study




as the corner  home study.



           Air lead levels (ug/m3) with actual traffic




counts at the  five traffic densities in the intersection




study are given in Table 14.   In Figure 39, mid-block ys



intersection air lead levels  were plotted to  examine the



correspondence between these locations within a block  and to  observe




whether these air lead levels were related to increasing traffic density.




Each point on the plot is a letter which defines its traffic  density group;




                 A = 10,000/1,000




                 B = 10,000/5,000




                 C = 15,000/1,000




                 D = 25,000/5,000




                 E = 25,000/10,000 cars/day-




The line drawn at  45° merely indicates which  of  the two



air leads determining a point is higher.  Those  points below




the line have  higher air lead at midblock than  at inter-




sections; and  those above the line have higher  air  lead




at intersections.   The graph implies an approximate 1:1




correspondence between air lead at blocks and intersections
                             152

-------
          Figure 39.  Intersection Study:  Air Lead Levels at Intersection

          and Midblock Locations.  Traffic Densities:  A = 10,000; B = 10,000/5,000;

          C = 15,000/1,000; D = 25,000/5,000; E = 25,000/10,000 cars/day.
       an
       •o
       fl
       32
                                        0  D
                1        2       3       if       5      6       7

                             Air Lead at Midblock (ug/m1)





for  traffic  densities A-D(less than  30,000  cars/day).  In



addition,  50% of the points at these traffic  densities



fall below the 45°  line indicating air lead is not higher



at these intersections.   There seems to be  little differ-



entiation  between air lead  levels  at traffic  densities  less



than 20,000  cars/day as indicated  by the lack of clustering



of groups  A,  B,  and C.   This agrees  with our  findings in
                               153

-------
traffic density mini-study (section III A 1) where the



relationship between air lead and traffic density increased



substantially only after traffic levels rose above 25,000



cars/day.  Points labelled D and E on the graph are at



traffic levels above 30,000 cars/day and indeed have higher



air lead levels.  The graph also implies that above 30,000



cars/day the relationship between midblock and intersection



air lead changes;  however, three of the midblock air lead



levels at density E seem unusually low compared to other



midblock air leads at similar traffic densities (see Table



14).  As in the traffic density mini-study, the data are



scarce at levels above 25,000 cars/day and few conclusions



about trends can be drawn.  The statistical significance



of differences in air lead demonstrated in this graph was



tested using a two level nested ANOVA with the result that



significant differences were found among traffic densities



(P = 5.0 x 10" ) and between midblock and intersection



locations (P = 1.1 x 10~4).  The variances of the ten groups



were homogeneous.




           Air lead and traffic density levels for the



corner home study are listed in Table 15 and are plotted



in Figure 40.  Again a line is drawn at 45° to assist visual



differentiation between air lead levels which were greater



at midblock  (below the line)  and those greater at inter-



ections (above the line).  Air lead levels were greater
                           154

-------
            Table  14. Intersection Study: Air Lead Concentrations at
                    Intersections  and Midblock Locations.
Air Lead (ug/r.3)
Block
1.44
1.05
.98
1.96
2.61
1.61
1.88
1.39
3.23
1.87
.90
3.69
4. 15
3.47
4. 47
3.88
4.02
1.63
1.31
1.99

Intersection Block Intersecting Street Traffic Density
1.65
2.02
1.09
1.91
2. 18
2.56
2.98
1. 44
2.46
2. 19
1.25
2.73
3.48
2. 19
3.46
2.70
5.77
4.30
5.04
6.80
7,794
9,971
9,970
9,804
10,960
10,994
11, 446
12,259
12,698
12,858
14, 114
14,252
22,818
23, 189
23,429
23,431
23,607
27,7-40
28,226
30, 199
261
1,632
1,803
1.697
5,671
6,908
6, 184
6,781
461
437
427
433
7,646
7,819
8, 105
7,901
7.918
10,337
10,239
11,220
A
10,000/1,000
B
10, 000/5, 000
C
15.000/1,000
D
25,000/5,000
E
25,000/10, 000
Mean Air Lead (yg/m3)
Block
A 1.36
B 1.87
C 2.42
D 3.99
E 2.24
Intersection
1.67
2.29
2. 15
2.96
5.48
at intersections at  8  of the 14 pairs  of locations.  There

seems  to be no clustering of traffic density levels A, B,

C, or  D.   For this reason and the fact that two density
D samples were lost, a paired comparison t-test was used
to test  for differences between air lead levels at inter-
sections  and midblock  locations.  Variances were tested
                             155

-------
       Table  15.  Corner Home  Study;  Air Lead Levels (yg/m3)
                 at Intersections and Midblock Locations


       Air Lead  (Ug/m
Block Intersection
.22
.89
1.19
.12
1.64
. 81
1. 06
1.30
.73
1.42
.58
.63
1.19
1.42
.41
.33
.86
.98
1.01
2.15
1.17
2.29
.99
1.72
.71
.58
.90
1.07
Block Intersecting Street Traffic Density
121
146
390
393
3,980
8,651
11,266
12,712
11,467
12,411
16,567
16,629
21,324
23,883
120
140
292
245
199
728
1,229
996
200
146
831
952
249
246
A

1,000/1,000

B

10,000/1,000

C

15,000/1,000

D
25,000/1,000
Mean Air Lead (ug/m3 )
Block
Intersection
       A   0.61     0.65
       B   1.20     1.66
       C   0.84     i.OO
       D   1.31     0.99


        Overall Mean

           0.94    1.08

        Standard Error of Mean

           0.122   0.158
and were homogeneous. No significant difference was found

between air  lead levels at these  locations at the  0.05

level  (t = 0.90, P = 0.39).

           Conclusions:  Two  intersections studies were

done.  In the  first, significant  increases in air  lead

levels were  found among traffic densities which ranged

from 8,000 to  40,000 cars/day.  In the same study  air lead

levels were  significantly higher  at intersections  than at

in midblock  locations primarily due to differences at the


                            156

-------
         Figaro 40. Comer Home Study: Mr Le.id Levels at Midblock and Intersections
         locations. Traffic Densities: A = 1,000/1,000; B  10,000/1,000; C = 15,0000/1,000;
         D = 25,000/1,000 cars/day.
                      1.0             2-0

                           Air Lead at MidbJock (uq/m't
                                                    3. 0
highest  traffic density.  The second study tested for  an

increase  in air lead  levels  for participants in  this study

who  lived near  1,000  car/day intersecting  streets.   No

significant differences in these midblock  and 1,000 car/day

intersections locations were found.
                                157

-------
      6.     Results of Speed Limit Mini-study

             The objective of this  study was to determine the effect of

traffic speed on the amount of  air  lead for a given traffic leve.  Air lead

concentrations  (vig/m ) were measured  in two speed zones: 30 MPH and 45 MPH.

Air samples and traffic counts  were taken for five days each on a 30 MPH

and on a 45 MPH street which had similar traffic densities.  Although an

attempt was made to locate two  streets with the same traffic density, the

mean traffic count on the 45 MPH street (9369 cars/day) was 19% higher than

the mean for the 30 MPH street' (7879  cars/day) .   We would expect lower air

lead levels at the faster traffic speed due to the shorter time that the

vehicle is present to emit lead.  Higher traffic counts at the faster speed

could cause elevation of air lead levels thereby reducing the difference in

air lead between the two speed  zones.   This effect, if it exists, will make

the difference in air lead over speed zones more difficult to detect.  The

air lead levels and associated  traffic counts and means are given in Table 16.
             Table 16.  Air Lead Concentrations (ug/m?) at Two Speed Limits
                       (30 and 45 MPH).
                     30 MPH
                                                45 MPH
Air Lead
(UB / m3 )
0 . 8 '-1 8
0.650
0. 844
0. ^47
1. 860
Traffic
Count
7433
7665
8570
8054
7672
Air Lead
( "s/nV3)
0. 827
0. 424
0. 623
0. 598
0. 219
Traffic
Count
9853
9624
8994
9198
9176
        Mean 1. 040
                            7879
                                          0.538
9369
             Air Lead (ug/m3)

30 MPH
45 MPH
Geometric
Mean
0.97
0.49
Li
0.60
0.26
LZ
1.58
0.93
                                  158

-------
           A two fold difference can be seen between the



mean values for air lead, with the higher level being



associated to the 30 MPH site.  It will be noticed that



one value at the 30 MPH site is significantly higher than



the others.  Even without this data point (1.860), the mean



value for the 30 MPH site is still 0.835 yg/m3 vs 0.538



for the 45 MPH site.  Comparison of geometric means also



shows a factor of two between the two sites.



           To examine the statistical significance of these



results, a paired t-test was used with log transformation



to achieve homogeneity of variance.  No significant difference



was found between the air lead levels at the two speed



zones (t = 1.31, P = 0.07), although a two fold difference



can be seen between the geometric means (0.97 and 0.49).




The large variation in these samples is reflected in the



size of the confidence limits plotted in Figure 41.



            Conclusions:  A large apparent difference was



noticed between air lead levels on 30 MPH and 45 MPH



streets with the lower speed having nearly twice the air



lead of the higher speed.  However, the statistical con-



fidence was not established in this result,  perhaps due




to the limited sample size.
                             159

-------
                       Figure 41
             Air Lead Concentrations vs Two Speed Limits
           2.0
           1.5
T31.0

O


l-l
•H
<


 0.5
                              L 1
                                           -i- L 2
                              L 2
                                           -L L .1
                          30 mph
                               45 mph
     7.    Results of  Indoor  vs  outdoor Air Lead
           Mini-study

           It was of interest to know whether a significant

portion of the lead in outside air near the street was

present inside homes.   Air  lead measurements were made

both inside and outside the same house simultaneously for

a 10-12 hour period.   As these measurements were made using

standard  HI vol samples run between 50 and 60 cfm the distinct

possibility exists  for the  sampler to have acted as  a vacuum and

therefore produced  artiflcally low air lead levels.  Sixteen

of these  pairs of measurements were made at two different

traffic densities  (9  at 10,000 cars/day, and 7 at 20,000

cars/day).  These data with means and confidence limits are

given below and are plotted in Figure 42.
                               160

-------
           Indoor vs Outdoor Air Lead (yg/m3)
      10,000 cars/day
                      20,000 cars/day
Indoor
*0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.34
.65
.30
.07
.09
.10
.08
.34
.19
Outdoor
0.
•
3.
0.
1.
1.
0.
1.
0.
87
17
01
69
70
12
81
32
74
Indoor
0
0
0
0
0
0
0


.12
.23
.27
.07
.12
.25
.55


Outdoor
1.
2.
0.
1.
2.
2.
3.


70
17
98
92
31
46
87


Arithmetic
Mean         0.24
Geometric
Mean
0.18
             0.10
         1.16
0.92
         0.50
N
0.34     1.68


9        9
             0.23
0.19
             0.10
                                   0.36
2.20



2.05


1.40


3.01


7
* Evaporative Cooler
                             161

-------
       12VJ
                                     FIGURE 42
                         INDOOR vs.  OUTDOOR AIR LEAD CONCENTRATION:
                                AT TUO TRAFFIC DEIJHTIES
             3.Or
             2.5
             2.0-
              .0"
I
                                                               95%
                                                               CONFIDENCE
                                                               LIMITS
                indoor outdoor  indoor outdoor
                   JO,000        20,000
                 cars/day       cars/day
All of these houses  had central or window air conditioning units

with one exception  (marked with an asterick) which  had an evaporative

cooler.  A two-way ANOVA (fixed effects) was used to test the effects of

indoor  vs outdoor air  lead  and  10,000 vs  20,000  cars/day.
                                  162

-------
Prior to a log-,g transformation, the variances of the four



groups were heterogeneous; therefore, log transformed data were



used for the ANOVA.  There was no significant difference in the



traffic densities  (P = 0.10) nor was the interaction term sig-



nificant (P = 0.14).  The difference between indoor and outdoor



air lead levels was highly significant  (F = 61.70, P = 1.5 X 10~'



            The sampling variation is often large in small



samples such as these.  For example, the standard deviation for



these data is 1.11, roughly twice 0.61, the standard deviation



of the 152 air lead measurements used in the traffic density



study-  For this reason, differences among means which seem



large may not be significant, i.e., the difference between



outdoor air lead means, 1.16 and 2.20.  Referring to Table 9, we



see that air lead means at traffic densities similar to 20,000



cars/day vary from 0.85 to 1.25 ug/m  with 6-10 replicates per



mean.   Mean air lead for these 25 samples was 1.05 yg/m  with



mean traffic count 20,076 cars/day.  Interpretation of a 2X



difference in outdoor air lead in this mini-study would be in-



valid in view of the large variation here and the findings of



the larger air lead/traffic density mini-study (IIIA1).



            Conclusions:  There were highly significant dif-




ferences between outdoor and indoor air lead with outdoor air



lead 5 to 10 times higher.  There were no differences between



indoor samples taken on a 10,000 cars/day street and those



taken on a 20,000 cars/day street.  Outdoor lead samples



at the 10,000 vs 20,000 cars/day were very close to but not



significantly different at the 0.05 level.
                            163

-------
       8.     Results of Indoor vs. Outdoor
              Dustfall Mini-study

              Outdoor dust samples (28-day dustfall) were taken at 10

locations and each sample was paired with an indoor dust sample either

from the same residence or within the same area.  The lead concentrations

of these pairs of samples and actual traffic counts and their means and

standard errors are given in Table 17 and are plotted in Figure 43.  One

outdoor dust lead (0.7252) was tested as an outlier using Dixon's r-,0

         Table  17. Outdoor Dustfall Lead Concentrations (ug/cma) from Ten
     Locations with Corresponding Indoor Dustfall Lead Concentrations
     and Traffic Counts.
                                                Traffic Count

                                                  474
                                                 6654
                                                10637
                                                15156
                                                16219
                                                16381
                                                17452
                                                20483
                                                20928
                                                31542
Outdoor Dust
Pb (ug/cma)
0. 2000
0. 0827
0. 0865
0. 0945
0. 0811
0. 1586
0. 0913
0. 0392
0. 7252-
0. 2121
Indoor Dust
Pb (i£_/cm9
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0026
0092
0025
0604
0016
0128
0104
0034
0047
0071
    Mean.SE                Meanj.SE
    0. 121£f±0. 01779           0. 0122"±0. 0062
    N=9                    N=9
    - Rejected as outlier (P<<0.005)

      (28)
test,      found  to be  significantly  higher than  the other sam-

ples  (r1Q  =  0.80,  P «  0.005),  and rejected.  If this  outlier

had not been rejected,  the results of this analysis would have

been  the same but  with  a lower  level of significance,  because

retaining  it makes the  variance considerably higher.   The

lead  concentrations of  the 9  remaining pairs of  samples
                                164

-------
                             FIGUJC 43
                   LEAD IN OUf-T (INDOOR AND OUTDOOR) vs. TRAFFIC r>E?lMTv
Lead
Concentration
Dust Samples
                             15000     2nnni



                               TRAFFIC DENSITY
 were conpared using Wilcoxon's signed ranks test and were found to be sig-

 nificantly different  (P<0.005).   Indoor vs. outdoor dust lead is plotted

 in Figure 44.  The mean outdoor dust lead  (0.1218 yg/cm2)  was approximately

 10 times the mean for  indoor dust lead (0.0122 yg/cm2).   When outdoor dust

 lead was compared with the mean of all 268 indoor dust lead samples dis-

 cussed in section  III B 3 (0.0082 yg/cm2), the ratio  was approximately 15:1.

               Different collection methods were used:  indoor dust samples

 with a tray and outdoor samples with a bucket.  Both are described in the

 Methods section.  The  reason for this difference was to avoid possible

 effects of wind outside.   Rain had no effect on outdoor.samples since rain-

 water was simply held  in the bucket (see Section III C 2).

               Conclusions:  Outdoor dust lead concentrations from 9 locations

 were found to be significantly higher (at least 10X) than indoor dust lead

 concentrations in adjacent or nearby residences.
                                   165

-------
              FI'MiE 44. IIIDOOR vs. OUTDOOR flUVT LF./IO COUCENTRATIOns AT » MtTCI'ED LOCATIONS
        I'-d'-.rr rt'ist Lead
        CT.cir.trMtirr.
         (un.'c.i-)
                             .10     .15     .20      .25

                             miTiywp OUST LE'.n cn'iCENTR'TtoN (uo/ci"2)
      9.     Results of  Collection Times Less
            24 Hours Mini-study

            Twenty-four hour collection times for air  lead

and traffic density have  been used for most  of the studies

described in this report.   This mini-study was designed  to

determine whether shorter sampling times  could be used to

measure  air lead as efficiently as 24 hour sampling periods.

Air samples and traffic counts were taken for two days each

at three traffic densities for following  shorter time periods:

1 hour,  2 hours, 4 hours,  and 12 hours.   One location was

used  for each traffic  density (10,000, 15,000 and 25,000

cars/day).   Twenty-four hour samples from the same street

which were begun either on the same day,  the same day of
                             166

-------
the week, or  a  similar  day of the  week were  used.(Midweek

days  were not considered similar to Mondays,  Fridays,  or

weekends.)  The number  of hours sampled, date sampling began,

traffic counts, and air lead levels are listed in Table 18.
       Table 18.
              Collection Times Less Than 24 Hours: Air Lead and Traffic Counts
              for Five Collection Times at Three Traffic Levels.
                        Traffic Count         Range of
       i Hours  Date   Traffic    Projected  Air Lead   Air Lead
       Sampled  Began  Count    to 24 Hr.   (uglm3)  for each time Estimated Traffic Level
1
' 1
2
' 2
4
' 4
12
'12
24
'24
1
1
2
2
4
4
12
12
24
24
1
1
2
2
4
4
12
12
24
24
9/24
9/25
9/24
9/25
9/24
9/25
9/24
9/25
9/24
9/25
9/29
9/30
9/29
9/30
9/29
9/30
9/29
9/30
10/1
9/23
10/17
10/24
10/17
10/24
10/17
10/24
10/17
10/24
10/21
10/22


1.

2,
1,
7,
7,
9,
9,


1,
1,
2,
3,
9,
9,
12,
14,
1,
1,
2,
2,
5,
5,
17,
io,
22,
23,
483
139
110
653
244
908
624
453
970
971
534
671
158
338
941
086
004
422
693
252
374
282
671
718
396
949
314
903
313
429
11
4
13
7
13
11
15
14
9
9
14
16
13
16
17
13
18
18
12
14
32
30
32
32
35
35
34
33
22
23
,592
,536
,320
,396
,464
,448
,248
,916
,970
,971
,016
,104
,896
,056
,646
,516
,003
,384
,698
,252
,976
,768
,052
,616
,376
,694
,628
, 806
,318
,429
2.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
1.
0.
1.
3.
2.
1.
1.
1.
0.
1.
1.
3.
3.
2.
6.
2.
7.
1.
7.
1.
Q ,
4.
4.
23
61
74
01
91
65
31
35
93
OS
19
30
40
24
40
76
77
19
23
69
00
91
33
28
83
23
29
92
15
47
0.

0.

0.

0.

0.

0.

0.

0.

0.

0.

4.

4.

5.

5.

0.

62

27

26

04

07

39

16

64

58

46

91

95

35

63

32

10,000 cars/day









15,000 cars/day









25,000 cars/day









        Shows effect of sampling began at 10 A.M.
        Others began at 3-9 A.M.
Also listed  are all  of the traffic counts adjusted to a

24  hour time period  and the  range  (or  difference  in this

case)  between the  two air lead samples for each  time period.

On  a given day the 1, 2, 4,  and 12 hour samplers  were begun

at  the same  time  (8-9 A.M.).   On the  following day or the

same day  one week  later, the samplers  were begun  again  at

the same  time.  There is an  exception  at the  10,000 car/day


                               167

-------
location where samplers were begun on 9/25 at 10 A.M. in-



stead of 8-9 A.M.  As a result the 1, 2, and 4 hour traffic



counts are depressed by 60%, 41%, and 15%, respectively,



when compared to the corresponding traffic counts on 9/24.



Comparison of the two 12 hour counts shows that the dif-



ference has diminished to 2% after this length of sampling



time, and there is no difference after the 24 hour sampling



period. Thus longer sampling minimizes the effects of the



exact time when sampling began.  Air lead levels did not



seem to be affected by the late starting time; however,



the results of the other mini-studies show that air lead



is not especially sensitive to differences in low traffic



counts.  The difference in starting time would probably



have caused a difference in air lead at a 30,000 car/day



location.



           Traffic counts were overestimated when sampled



for less than 24 hours as indicated by the lower 24 hour



counts in the column for traffic counts adjusted to 24 hour



time periods.  This is expected since the shorter time periods



were during the daytime.




           The range in air lead decreases as sampling time



increases at all three traffic locations  (see Table 18).



This implies that longer sampling periods have lower var-



iances although two samples are not adequate for drawing



conclusions about variances.  At the 25,000 car/day location,
                           168

-------
the range or  difference between  duplicate times  is  unusually

large.  Comparison of air lead levels and sampling  dates

shows that  for times 1, 2, 4, and  12  hours, air  lead  levels

on 10/17 are  2.00, 2.33, 1.88, and 1.29 and on 10/24  are

6.91, 7.28, 7.23,  and 6.92 yg/m3.   Traffic counts for du-

plicate samples are similar.  The  consistently lower  air

lead levels on 10/17 are probably  the result of  some  meteoro-

logical condition, i.e., a change  in  wind direction,  rain,

or air stagnation.  It is not possible to determine the

exact cause at this time.  The air lead levels vs.  traffic

counts  (adjusted to 24 hour level)  are plotted in Figure

45 with each  of the three locations encircled.   The dif-

ferences in dates  10/17 and 10/24  at  the 25,000  car/day
       Injure •!'.». Ml lu.i.l U-vi'ls v;;Ti,»flu UriMly toi I ixii mil- -I i
       h-vi-Li, (• - lO.uilO, * IS,mill; • 2'j, '10(1 ,\tr:> 'd.r, ) .
                                      . Illl,-.' Vl ll I 1
            (,0'>u   I il, 'Hin   I 1 , nun   | ft , •

             .'.l-lli'in '1 i ,il I i .' '•••ui.i '• H  'I ' l
                                           ii, nun  l-l, nut)
                             169

-------
location are prominent.  The smaller ranges of the 24 hour

samples as opposed to the 1, 2, 4, and 12 hour samples are

seen in the 10,000 and 15,000 car/day locations. The low

outlying point at 2280 cars/day reflects the 10 A.M. start-

up time.  No relationships such as higher or lower estimates

of air lead associated with length of sampling times can

be seen.

           Conclusions;  Shorter collection times tend to

overestimate traffic volume and introduce more variability

in air lead measurements.  The range in air lead measure-

ments increased with shorter sampling times at all traffic

densities.  No relationship between air lead levels and

length of collection times was seen.

B.   Determination of the Relationship Between
     Blood Lead Levels and Traffic Density

     1.    Results of Recruitment Activities

           a.    Number of Subjects

                  (1)   Original Design

                       The original design criteria for

participants included the following numbers of qualified

volunteers in each age, sex, and traffic density category:
                               Traffic Density
                  Site 1  Site 2  Site 3  Site 4  Total

Preschoolers
  Male              30      30      30      30     120
  Female            30      30      30      30     120

Females that        30      30      30      30     120
  work at home
  (20-49 yrs)

Older persons       30      30      30      30     120
  (50+ yrs.)
  Male & Female
                            170

-------
                 (2)   Modified Design

                       Even with additional incentives

and techniques, the results of recruitment of volunteers

was less than completely successful in the second stage

of survey activities.  This is particularly true regarding

the recruitment of preschoolers.

                       Because of the severe problems of

meeting the required numbers of preschoolers, it was pro-

posed to the Project Officer that the number be revised

to the following specifications:

                                 Traffic Density
                    Site  1   Site  2  Site 3   Site  4   Total

  Preschoolers
   Male  & Female     40      40       40       40       160

  Females that
   work  at  home
    (20-49 yrs.)      40      40       40       40       160

  Older Persons
    (50+ yrs.)
   Male  & Female     40      40       40       40       160
                                                     480



The Project Officer agreed to this change as being acceptable

and within reasonable probability of attainment, seeing the

results at that time.

                 (3)   Volunteers Obtained

                       Results of the survey recruitment

activities are presented in Table 19.  A total of 1850
                           171

-------
                                TABLE 19.


                           RECRUITMENT RESULTS
Parameter
No. HHQ Forms
Total No. Residents
Ave. No. Residents/HH
Total No. Eligible*
Total No. Volunteers
Ave. % of Volunteers
(of those eligible)
Traffic Density
Site 1
545
1452
2.66
523
201
38.4
Site 2
485
1283
2.64
533
213
40.0
Site 3
409
1026
2.51
242
119
49.2
Site 4
411
1130
2.75
301
184
61.1

Total
1850
4891
2.64
1599
717
44.8
      *  Number eligible obtained from Household Questionnaire form; no
      reference to race on HHQ form.


household surveys were performed for households with 4891 residents.  A


total of 1599 residents were encountered who were eligible  regarding age,


occupation, sex, and residence of which 717 volunteers were recruited.   Of


the 1850 residences, 986 or 53% of the total reported  one or more persons


eligible for the study (without regard to race).  From the  986 residences


reporting one or more eligible person, 476 or 48% of the total provided


one or more volunteers for the study.  The total of 717 volunteers from the


986 residences reporting one or more eligible persons  yields a rate of  .72


volunteers per residence with one or more eligible persons.  This response


rate is considered to be very good for a residential study  involving free


living  (rather than institutional or isolated) populations.


              The Household Questionnaire Form used in this study makes no


reference to race or ethnic background.  In the recruitment of volunteers,


no reference was made to any requirement for race or ethnic background. The


neighborhoods selected for the study were selected so  as to maximize the
                                  172

-------
potential for finding white, non-Spanish volunteers.  The



number of volunteers obtained, shown in Table 19, include



some who were later ineligible due to the requirements for



participants to be white, non-Spanish.  From these numbers,



the average percent of volunteers of those listed as eligible



is 44.8%.  It is expected that this number would be higher



if the statistics accounted for only white, non-Spanish.



Because no reference is made to race in the HHQ form, and



the number of eligible persons is determined with use of that



form, it is not possible to calculate the precise number.



                        A second factor is also reflected



in the statistics presented in Table 19 regarding the per-



cent of volunteers.  The volunteer rate was significantly



higher in the second stage of recruitment due to the in-



creased efforts directed at recruitment and additional re-



cruitment techniques applied.  The second stage of recruit-



ment was concentrated on the higher traffic densities



(Sites 3 and 4)  and the percent volunteering reached greater



than 60% as opposed to 40% for Sites 1 and 2.



                        An analysis has been performed to



compare household characteristics for volunteers versus



persons eligible who did not volunteer for this study.



Results are presented below.  Five pertinent characteristics




of the households were used in the comparison:  (1) Median



education level of the household head, (2) Occurrence of






                             173

-------
        Comparison of Household Characteristics:
         Volunteers vs. Eligible Non-Volunteers
Household
Characteristics

Median Education
Level of House-
hold Head

Occurrence of
Lead Screening

Presence of
Air Conditioning

Median Age of
Structure

Median Length
of Residence
Households of
Eligible Persons
Who Volunteered
(Col 53>0,Col 70>0)

Level 6 - Partial
College
1.9%


94.7%


21 years


7 years
Households of
Eligible Persons
Who Refused
Col 53>0,Col 70=0)

Level 6 - Partial
College
1.8%


95.5%


22 years


11 years
lead screening for one or more members of the family previous

to this study, (3) Presence of air conditioning  (central

or window unit) in the home, (4)  Median Age of the structure,

and (5) Median length of residence at the address.  For four

of the five characteristics, the volunteers are remarkably

similar to those refusing to volunteer.  On the fifth charac-

teristic, length of the residence at the address, a sizeable

difference is noticed in the median values: 7 years for

volunteers, 11 years for eligible non-volunteers.  This

difference may be interpreted to mean that those who were
                           174

-------
the more established residents (having lived in the neigh-




borhood longer)  may be more reluctant to volunteer than




those with less length of residence in the neighborhood




who are more mobile by definition and perhaps more open to




change or approach by a study such as this.  The conclusion




of this comparison is that little or no bias is indicated




due to any differences in characteristics of volunteers




versus those eligible who did not volunteer.




                       In summary, the average number of




eligible persons per household encountered was 0.86 and




the average number of persons volunteering per household




was 0.39, or approximately one for every 2.5 residences.




The average number of volunteers per residence with one or




more eligible persons is 0.72, and is considered high.  The




average number of eligible preschoolers per household was




0.10 and the average number of preschool volunteers per




household was 0.067, or approximately one for every 15




residences.  The low number of preschoolers is considered




to be at least in part due to the high traffic densities




involved in the study.  A strong bias exists for families




with small children not to locate on busy thoroughfares.




Characteristics of the eligible population who volunteered




are very similar to characteristics of eligible non-volunteers
                           175

-------
            b.     Participant Selection

                  (1)   Number of Participants
                        Accomplished

                        The number  of  participants for which

samples have been obtained is presented in Table 20 by age,

sex, and traffic level.  Of the persons volunteering for the

study, only those meeting all criteria, including the

ethnic criterion of white, non-Spanish were included as

participants.  The numbers presented in Table 20 accounts

for dropout of volunteers who were  selected but who sub-

sequently were unable to participate  (refused, moved, etc.).
  Table 20. Number of Participants by Age, Sex, and Traffic Level
Traffic
Level
1
2
3
4
Total
Total
130
113
117
82
442
M
35
35
28
22
120
F
95
78
Sy
60
322
1-8 yrs
M
20
17
6
11
54
F
24
15
19
9
67
19-49 yrs
M
0
0
0
0
0
F
50
41
48
39
178
50 yrs.
M
15
18
22
11
66
F
21
22
22
12
77
                             176

-------
                       Ot the total 442 participants selected





for the study, the number of preschool participants totaled





121, females 13-49 years totaled 178, and older persons





totaled 143.  These numbers compare to the design criterion





of 160 persons in each category.  It is apparent that re-




cruitment of the younger and older participants was less





successful than the middle group.  The worst statistics





were obtained for the highest traffic density level. Site





4, where a total of 20 preschoolers and 23 older persons





were recruited.  The design criterion was 40 persons in





each of these categories.






                  (3)   Selection Criteria





                       From the volunteers recruited, a





set of participants was selected which best met all the





study criteria for age, sex, race, economic level, occu-




pation, langth of residence, and traffic density-  For





each of these parameters a set of guidelines was established





for minimum restrictions and for selection of bias where





more than sufficient candidate volunteers were available
                             177

-------
for a given category of participants.





                       (a)    Age



                             The age groupings for partici-





pants were adjusted to miximize usage of the volunteers





available for selection.   The minimum age for older persons





was shifted from 60 years to 50 years due to insufficient





members of volunteers in the 60 and over group.  A small





number of females who work at home were selected with





ages less than 20 years due to multiple members of family





being selected.






                       (b)    Sex






                             For the preschool children,





the design criteria included separate categories for




males and for females.  Because of the difficulties encoun-




tered in recruitment, the separate categories for males




and females were combined to a single category and volun-




teers were selected on the basis of age rather than age





and sex.  For Site 1, sufficient volunteers were available





to select equal numbers of males and females.
                             178

-------
                       (c)  Race




                            Of those persons volunteering




for the study, only white, non-Spanish persons were selected




to participate in the study.




                       (d)  Economic Level




                            Study volunteers were obtained




from areas of the city designated as middle class by use




of census records and by direct observation of the apparent




economic level of study neighborhoods.




                       (e)  Occupation




                            The occupation of volunteers




was restricted to those who were routinely occupied at




home.  For persons partially occupied away from home, a




guideline cut off level of 20 hours per week was estab-




lished and applied to candidate volunteers.  If the candidate




volunteers spent more than 20 hours a week (half-time of




a normal 40 hour week) at an occupation (work, school,




nursery, etc.) away from home, the volunteer was not accepted




as a participant.




                       (f)  Length of Residence




                            A minimum of 6 months residence




was required of volunteers selected as participants.
                             179

-------
                       (g)  Traffic Density



                            Candidate volunteers were select-




ed for each traffic density site on the basis of estimated



traffic densities determined from maps and existing traffic



records.  Traffic on each of the streets from which volunteers



were selected was counted during the study activities.



The traffic counting activities and results are documented



in Section IV. D.  These actual traffic counts were used



to replace the estimated counts used to initially assign



candidate volunteers to specific traffic density sites.



Thus, the final assignment of study participants to specific



traffic density levels is based on measured rather than



estimated traffic counts.



                       (h)  Excess Volunteers



                            Where an excess of volunteers



was available, selection of participants was based on two



premises.  First, for preschoolers and persons over 50



years, an equal number of males and females was desired.



Secondly, in all age classes, an even distribution of ages



was desired; i.e., equal representation of all ages within



the category.  Participants were selected to meet these



goals as much as possible from the volunteers available.




                            For preschoolers, no surplus



was available from the volunteers.  All qualified volunteers



were selected.  For females in the middle group, all with



preschool children enrolled as participants were selected




                            180

-------
first.  Selection of  the  remainder was based on an even

distribution of ages.   In the  older group,  no excess of

males was available.  No  excess  of older group females was

available in Site 4;  all  qualified volunteers were selected.

In Sites 1,2, and 3,  older females were selected on the

basis of the best distribution of  ages.

                  (3)    Participating Households at.
                        Intersections

                        An analysis of the number of par-

ticipating households at  intersections is presented in Table

21.  Of the total of  280  participating households, 55 were

at intersections or a total  of 19.6% of all residences.
        Table 21. Number of Participating Households at Inter-
                sections
Parameter

Total Number
of Households
Contacted
Total Number
of Partici-
pating House-
holds
Total Number
of Partici-
pating House-
holds at Inter
sections
5 Participat-
ing House-
holds at
Intersections
Traffic Densitv
Site 1

545


76




5



6.6

Site 2

485


70




7



10.0

Site 3

409


79




29



36.6

Site 4

411


55




14



25.4

Total

1850


280




55



19 .6

                             181

-------
The number at intersections varied considerably from lowest



6.6%, Site 1) to highest (36.6%, Site 3).  A significant



difference is also noted between the lower two traffic



density sites (average of 8.2%) and the higher two traffic



density sites (average 32.0%).  This difference is explained



in that more recruiting occurred in the higher two sites



during stage 2 of the study.  It was also taken into account



that location on an intersection with very low traffic density



is less important for thoroughfares with very high traffic



densities  (Sites 3 and 4) than for streets with less traffic




density (Sites 1 and 2).



     2.    Description of the Study Participants



           a.    General Description



                 In the study reported herein, the par-



ticipants who were selected and who actually provided the



study with biological and other environmental samples can



be generally characterized as white, middle class residents



of a very urbanized community.  Participating families have



heads of household who are educated to the level of partial



college education, as a median value.  Of the adult parti-



cipants, 32% are classified as smokers.




           b.    Paint Lead Restriction



                 Participants were selected without regard



to paint lead at the outset.  Biological and other samples



were collected from all participants.  The measurement for
                           182

-------
paint  lead was analyzed after sample collection  activities

were complete.  Participants with  paint lead measurements

in excess of 1% lead  (1-4 mg/cm2)  were excluded  from statis-

tical  analysis if  the  lead levels  for these individuals

were found to be elevated.  Following this criterion, data

were eliminated for four female  participants and no male

participants.

            c.    Demographic Characteristics

                  The demographic characteristics of selected

participants is shown  in Table 22.   These characteristic

patterns are representative of the volunteers  excluded

from the study as  well as those  selected as participants.

The excluded volunteers were of  essentially the  same dem-

ographic structure as  the participating volunteers.  From

Table  22 it may be seen that for the characteristics of

number of persons  routinely at home, median education, median

length of residence, and median  hours per week away from

home,  the participant  characteristics are remarkably con-


      Table 22. Participant Demographic Characteristics
; , Persons Routinely
Traffic . :iumoer or ; i Smokers ' at home
-evel ; omct;?rs . lAdults) ' median
! I 23 26.4 ; 2
2 33 39.3:2
3 32 j 34.3 ' 2
4 13 ' 23.1 ' 2
r^tai. 10: 32.5 j 2
avo.
] .9
L.8
1.8
1 . 6
1.8
Median
Education
6
5
*
6
6
Median
Length of
Residence
6 yrs .
6 yrs .
6 yrs .
5 yrs.
6 yrs .
Median hrs/week
away form home
10
10
10
10
10
      •What is -re highest educational level completed by your head of
      housencld?
      \ i)  less than 3th grade           (5)  trade or vocational school
      (2;  3th grade                    beyond high scnool
      \2"  iigh sor.oo I-incomplete         ; 5}  college-incomplete
      4)  r.ich school-complete           (7)  col Lege (-4 years) -complete
                               ! 8)  post graduate
                             183

-------
sistent for the four traffic density sites.  The percentage




of smokers does vary significantly between the highest



39.3%, Site 2) and the lowest (26.4%, Site 1).  Sites 1-4



are sufficiently similar in demographic characteristics



to serve as comparison groups for use in the study.



      3.    Environitiental__Data



           a.    Soil



                 Soil lead concentrations  (ug/g) from



outside 277 residences were examined to determine their



relationship  to traffic density.  The frequency distribu-



tions  of soil lead over all sites and within the four traffic



densities  (sites) are shown in Figures 46 and 47.  Soil



lead  concentrations were significantly skewed to the right



both  in the overall distribution (skewness = 39.6) and in



the four sites  (skewness = 9.5, 20.4, 5.2, and 6.8 for sites



1-4,  respectively).  The critical value for skewness at



P = 0.05 is 1.96.  After a base 10 logarithmic transforma-



tion,  the data were not significantly skewed  (overall



skewness = -0.85, skewness at sites = 0.13, -0.45, -0.33,



0.92).  A single classification ANOVA was used to test for



differences among the four sites using a log transformation



to meet the assumptions for this test.  There were signi-



ficant differences in soil lead among the four sites at



P = 0.008, F = 4.0.  Multiple comparisons tests  (Student-



Newman-Keuls or SNK procedure) were done to determine at
                            184

-------
  Figuru 46.   Frequency  Distribution of Soil  Lead.
  1-1 ). 1.Vi>
  M 1. 1.1(1)
  /•"> )..1'.)(1>
  /  ' t.ll'lll) *
  "i- 1 i. lilt))
  •i'\ !..)ilH) +
  *>  ' 'i. 1(1(1)
  'i.V1. .)<)<*)*
  •1'1 I. 1'1H) *****
  M i. 1.10)**
  -1") l.-1'.ICI) ****•
  i')... lllO) ***
  I? l.'IO'l) ***V
  '•! )..HH1) ********
  .-"•1 i. 'HUD ***********
  ?''.). KJO) **************
  I ft i.(K)O) **+*•**+•* + ******•************< * **
  1^ ;.OH0) '! ******* A-*******************-******-******-******
   ;i i.')H(') •t*-**-v-***-* v********* ****** *•+*•*** tvt-v**********-***1* *********/ H
   ^ J..HH1) *-*r>VA"**tA-t **********************•****:*********************/ I
     1. '1   ) ',-*•' A--1-*
  -4 J. 01)11)
  - ( 1. HIM)
 J-JOIJP T-^NS  \r?'- DTNfrrrn  nv '"i  ir  ni^y  concin:- .vim  *'s,  ri'.s 'inii-nwi
MAXIMUM
•UNIMUH
                   I27.56H
                   IIW.424
                   2~l 1.
        Fiquru 47.  Fruqucncy DisLihution of  Soil Lc.id dt cai.-h Yrnftlu

        Sill:  I                  Sill:  '                  Sill  1
0-M..U1W)
rt.l J.DD15)
/c> I.-UIM)
'>•!.). t hill I
'>.-! I..MB)
   . I.-IU) *
   ..)»())*
   ..M(»>*
   . -MM) «*
      K4) *****
****

M"«
   ..HIM)
   ./IfrllD
   i1 MI.AHS HIIR Di-nrirtn nr
 HI-. Ml      III.V/4
:i.  .)(•».     l-"3.i-H
   I         /'J.u.n)
M1XIMIM     ;iw.nvn
•UN IMUM      6. lkl;t
                                mi r cniMcinH KITH *'s,
  I 
-------
which sites  soil  concentrations were different.  The SNK

procedure is  a posteriori test which delimits sets of means

which are not significantly different but are within a

larger set of means  which are significantly different.(29)

The four sites are  listed below in increasing size of the

mean  (column  5),  and nonsignificant sets  of sites are under-

lined.  The back-transformed means, their confidence limits

(LI and L^),  and  sample sizes (N)  are also given.  The rela-

tionship between  these means is shown graphically in Figure 48,

              Figure  48.  Soil Lead vs. Traffic Density.
            150'
            '00-
    Soi1 UvJ
    Concentration
             50
                                              9.3°' Con'i •lence Lirits



Site 1
Site 2
Site 3
Site 4


Geometric
Mean
73.62
92.26
110.92
105.93
Site :

L
59.
76.
94.
87.


i
74
21
44
92
Site 2
TRAFFIC
L2
90.73
111.69
130.27
127.62
Site 3
DENSITY
N
75
68
79
55
Site <:

Nonsignificant
Sets of Means
1234
	 	 -


                             186

-------
                     The means for soil  lead in Sites 3 and 4 (>13,500




cars/day are  significantly higher than in Sites 1 and 2 (<13,500  cars/day);




and Sites 2,  3 and 4  (>8,000 cars/day)  are significantly higher than Site 1




<600 cars/day) .  Although the mean for Site 3 is higher than the  mean for




Site 4,  the difference is not significant.  When the means are ranked in




increasing order  (as shown above), they are also in order of increasing




traffic  density  (with the exception of Sites 3 and 4 in which soil  lead




concentrations are approximately the same).




                     The relationship between soil lead and actual traffic




counts for the residences can be further  described by the regression




equation: y = 117.60 + 0.80 X, where y =  soil lead (yg/g)  and X = traffic




count/1000.   This regression equation must be interpreted with caution;




however, since only 0.5% of the variation soil lead has been explained




(R2 = 0.0049).  When R2 is small (<0.04), the variance around the re-




gression is almost as large as the original variance of y (soil lead) and




interpretation of the regression is inadvisable. '   '   Examination of




scatter  plots and residuals did not suggest any transformations for this




range of traffic counts.  The soil lead concentrations and corresponding




traffic  counts are listed in Appendix E.




                     A study was performed to  determine how




selected  soil characteristics would effect  the availability




of  lead deposited  on soil from auto emissions in the study




areas.   This  study was  conducted by an independent soil




chemist and the detailed report is given in  Appendix J.
                                 187

-------
                 The soil characteristics examined were



texture, clay minerology, organic content, and pH.  The



texture of the soils varied but a majority contained a clay



content which would favor retention of divalent Pb deposited



from auto emissions.  This clay texture makes the soils



less permeable to rain water and would minimize the amount



of downward transportation of Pb from the top soils.  This



would also favor runoff from the top soil layers during



heavy thunderstorms.



                 A majority  (80%) of the soils had moderately



high to high organic contents.  Due to the complexing and



chelating agents normally present in organic matter, it



is reasonable to believe these soils would favor retention



of Pb.



                 Most of the soil was within a pH range



of 7.0 to 8.0.  This along with the high carbonate and



sulfate ion content of the soils in this area favor the



formation of insoluble Pb carbonates, phosphates and sulfates.



These compounds are not likely to be leached from the soils



thereby favoring retention of the Pb.  About 20% of the



soils examined showed signs of alteration of the natural



texture of the soils.  This is thought to be the mixing



of fluvial sands to improve the plant growth characteristics



of the soils.  The addition of this sand does not favor Pb



retention on these particular soils.
                            188

-------
                 The soil samples studied in the Dallas




county-Arlington area indicated retention of Pb deposited



on them would be favored and leaching by environmental



factors (i.e., rainfall) would be minimal.



                 Conclusions;  There were significant dif-



ferences in soil lead concentrations among the four sites



with Sites 1 and 2  (lower traffic density) significantly



lower than Sites 3 and 4 (higher traffic density).   No



linear  (or nonlinear) relationship could be described for



these data.  In the study of soil characteristics,  the



majority of the soils were high in clay content and in



organic matter.  These types of soils have a high potential



for adsorption and storage of lead and formation of rela-



tively insoluble precipitates of lead.  The clay soils re-



tain lead deposited on and adsorbed by them; however, low



permeability of the clay may reduce initial infiltration



during heavy rainfall.



           b.    Tap Water



                 Tap water samples were taken from 271



residences for determination of lead content (yg/ml.).



Because drinking water is a source of lead, it was necessary



to determine the exact levels to which the participants



of this study were exposed and whether these lead levels



varied over the four traffic density sites.  The frequency



distributions for the variable water lead over all sites
                            189

-------
and for  each site are  shown in Figures 49 and  50.  The  data

are very skewed to the right because of the  large number


             Figure 49. Frequency Distribution of 'i'np Water Lead.
        •i U)"0 HIT'S
          .) IH17)
           1105)
            HIM) **
           MHD*
            11)2 ) +
           imp) *****
           oil,?)*
           •idl ) **
           '111 I ) ***********
           Mill ) ** + •**•***•******** + >* V*******
           .HI I ) .", *+ v***t*********fr *****************
            Hid) ***>**•*•*
.HI I ).", ** v***t*********** ****************
KH1) *• ** t* ^** *• t'VV*^***-^ ********* v **-**+**•* t:-V* ************* *-****R A
'I'll) H-H(-**1rJ-**-t '•*•'•***'•*• t ******* t*^+*t *•*• + + ************•****** KM
ICC)
                     "1.00177
                   ? n.
                     '•1.!1dV,0
                     U. II
of  very low values  (103 of the  total 271 were below  the

detection limit of  0.0002 yg/ml and are recorded as  zeroes).

Transformations of  the data did not correct the skewness;

therefore, a nonparametric test (Kruskal-Wallis one  way

ANOVA)  was used to  determine whether there  were differences

in  water lead among traffic sites.   The results (Table 23)

indicate that lead  content is similar in Sites 1,  2, and

4;  and  the significant difference is caused by low lead

content in Site 3.   Therefore,  no adjustments were made

for additional sources of lead  in water.  Means and  95%
                               190

-------
 Figure 50.  Frequency Distribution of Tap Water Lead at each Traffic Density.


SITE 1                SITE 2               Sll K i
                                                                    SHE 4
1.-IH7)
).'.M6)
I.D06)
J . 006) *
1.M06)
). .Mb)
1..H-M)
l./KM)* *
1.CK14) *
J.MM3)
J.0I13)
'!. ll^)
). 002) ** **
.1.1)02)*
^. 0'.1 I ) **
•.1.00 I ) **** **
H. ',101 )********* *****
J.0HI ) W ************ »(***
1.000) ******************* ********************
-•••). 000) *********************24 *********************3I
CJI'IOUI' MEANS ARE DENOTED BY M-"5 IF THEY COINCIDE HITH *"5
'(HAN 0.00052 0.00049
"i • i)EV. 0.00067 0.00100
i'l 75.000 67.000
M\XIMUM 0.00430 .5.00580
MINIMUM 0.0 0.0










*




*
*******
********
i( ******* *************2 8
*********************"! 2
, N'S OTHERWISE
0.00030
0.00042
77.^00
0.00280
").0

*









*
*


****
*****
«•******
*****************
****************

0.00057
0.00097
52.000
0.00620
0.0
confidence  limits at each site and over  all  sites  are  shown

in  Figure 51.    The mean  lead  concentration in tap  water

from all sites  was 0.00046  ±  0.000047  pig/ml.
         Table  23. Test for Differences Among Sites in H20 Lead Concentration (ug/ml)
                  Using Kruskal-Wallis Test
Site
Site
Sice
Site
1
2
3
4
N
75
67
77
52
Rank
Sum
11280.
8249 .
9571.
7-755.
Mean
5
0
0
5
0.
0.
0,
0.
,00052
.00049
.00030
.00057
SE
0.
0.
0.
0.
of Mean
0000778
0001224
0000474
0001349
         Kruskal-Wallis test statistic = 7.99*, Prob. = 0.045
         All Sices:  Mean ± SE = O.C0046 ± 0.000047  pg/ml
                                   191

-------
           Figure 51.  Tap Water Lead Concentration vs. Traffic Density.
            .0010
            .0008
             .0006


      Tai: Vata- Lsad
      ^or. 23'" tT£ti c11.
      ':'*'.'"' I


             .0004
             .0002
                         Site 1     Site 2    Site ?

                                   TRAFFIC DENSITY
                                                        All-sites
                   Conclusions:   Lead content in drinking

water was similar in Sites  1,  2, and 4 and lower in Site

3.   No adjustments were made  for an additional source  of

lead via drinking water.
                                192

-------
             c.
                    Indoor Dust
                    Indoor dust  samples  (28-day dustfall) were


 taken at 268  residences.  In  some cases,  the dust tray


 could not be  collected on the 28th day;  therefore, all dust


 lead  values were adjusted to  a 28-day base.  The  adjusted


 dust  lead concentrations (yg/cm2)  and the number  of collec-


 tion  days are given  in Appendix E.  Frequency distributions


 of  the variable indoor dust lead over all traffic densities


  (Figure 52) and for  each site (Figure 5.3)  were  examined.


 The mean indoor dust was highest in Site 2 and  a  relation-


 ship  with increasing traffic  density is  not apparent.  Re-

gression analysis explained only  0.7% of the variation in indoor dust lead


(R2 = 0.0065);  y = 0.007Q + 0.0001 X, where y = indoor dust  lead  (yg/cm2)



         Figure 52.  Frequency Distribution of Indoor Dust Lead.

     Ml POINTS

         '1M4)
         .'(W) *
         •176)
         ,572) *
         :i68)
         164)**
         ..16(1)*
         .'S6>

         .148) *
         ir
         I I 1.1)
                                  •>••* V-V-V** u •-*
                                            : IT***

                                      • t******* V******* | | H
                  iif.-.j or !:n n,Y '""5 II7 T'lf-'Y
                                     //IT1! *T>, N'S OTII^'WIS^
     " \ X
\:I       0.0082
1|-'V.     0.0112
I      268.0000
I"!'"     0.0802
r"ii'i     o.o
                                 193

-------
                Figure 53. Frequency Distribution of Indoor Dust Lead it each Traffic Density.


            SITE .           SITE 2           "SITE 1          SITE 4
       ^ i nro I NTS
         J.HSH)
          .
          l.H7ci>
          J.H72)
          J..164)
          O.H6H)
          I.J4B)
          .J.J16)
          J.J2H1*
          1.1)2'!)**
          O..I2B)
          1.H Irt)***

          I..112)**
          1. -I i)H) ***********
          }.'H)4) M **********
        OTOlli''MEANS *RE DENOTED BY M'S IF THEY COINCIDE KITH *>S, N'S OTHERWISE

         4FAN    0.0051           0.0102           O.OOM           0.0077
        S 1EV    0.0054           0.0144           0.134           0-0079
          -I     73.0000          67.0000           76.0000          52.0000
        •HXIMIIM   0.0285           0.0736           0.0802           0.0488
        HNII1UM   0.0             0.0010           0.0            0.0
and X = traffic  count/1000.   Scatter plots did not  suggest

any transformations.   The means and 95%  confidence  limits  for

each site  and all sites  are  shown  in Figure  54.

                    Conclusions:   No  detectable  relationship

between traffic  density  and  lead concentration in  indoor

dust samples was found.

             d.     Windowsill  Wipes

                    Windowsill  wipes  were  taken  at 258 resi-

dences and the lead content  of each was  measured.   Frequency

distributions of the variable windowsill wipe lead over

all sites  and at each  site are shown in Figures 55 and  56.

Two outliers were rejected:   1.9540 in  Site  2 and  4.6857
                                 194

-------
     Figure 54.  Indoor Dust Lead vs Traffic Density
       .015
       .010
        .005
                 Site 1     Site 2    Site 3    Site 4





                         Traffic Density
in Site  3 which were 5.5 aiii  13.3 standard deviations above




the overall mean  (P« .001).   Means and  confidence  limits




of each  site and  over all sites are shown in Figure 57.
                              195

-------
       Figure  55.   Frequency  Distribution  of Windowsill Wipe  Lead

HXCIJIDF.n
 VAMII-S(l)

           * \Anui. AT IONS  Ann oo'iPUTArinr^ wurcn  FOLLOW EXCLUDF VALUES I.ISTEO
    i .nco)
    • 1.0511)
    ••i. ^iici) **
    .1. ri50)*
    i.a1"'^)**
    0.750)
    1.7(1(1)*
     l.rt(IO)*

    H.550) **
    "1.500) *
     1.450) **
     1.4MO)**
     1.350) ****
    '1.25(5) ****
    '4.2HO) *********
    >'1. I 5(1) ***************
    1. U10) M **********************
      '
   - ldOO)
            -.1:****** ******** ***************************************** I C14
   -•1 HIM)
 GRo:jp '(FVJS AR^ npNornn  nv M'S IF THEY  coiMcinp wini  *'s,  N'S  OTHERWISE

  '/RAN          ',t.W>2
                 0. I 55
               56.0t10
                 M.9I I
  MNIMU'l        ;.>:
 (1) Excluded values arr 1.9540 (Site 2) and 4.6857 (Site 3).
            Figure lj\t.  Froquoncy Distribution of Vrindowaill v/ipo Load at each Traffic Density.


              SiTE I                 SITE 2                SITE 1                SITE 4
                                   ..I.                  . 
               TABULATIONS AND COMPUTATIONS WHICH FOLLOW EXCLUDE VALUES I ISTFO AROVF
        1.1150)
        I.. 1110)
        1.950)
        I.9H0)
        •?. 1)50)
        M. HUB)
        I). 75B>
        1.7(10)
        H.A50)
        H.450)
        'I.. 1(10) •
        .1.2H0)*                     ****                   „,                    M

        .1.1110) *******                „„„                   JJ"..                 **..,.*
        •). 050) M *******************    *********************   *************+*******p>1 **********
       -i'.0((10) *************»*******T5 ********************    **********-t^*.*A.h.t.*.b.fc,hin j.^j.^.j.x^.j.j.
       -J.J50)
       -«.IH0)
     GROUP MEANS ARE DENOTEO M M'S IF THEY COINCIDE KITH •'S, N'S OTHFBXISF:

      MEAN        0.052                 a.||2                 a.103                  0.105
     S. JEV.      0.072                 n.179                 0.168                  H.179
        '.',..     6*-"?i;                6I.B00                74.01)0                 52.HIM)
     MAXIMUM      0.414                 ^.B98                 0.871                  JI.9II
     (1)  1.9540, (2) 4.6857
                                         196

-------
              Figure 57. Windowsill Wipe Lead vs.Traffic Density.
            .20
 Window 5111
 Dust Lead
 Concentration
            .10-
            .05-
                   Site 1     Site 2   Site 3

                             TRAFFIC DEIISITY
Site 4  All-Sites
Examination of the means  r_.reals no relationship between window-

sill  lead and traffic density.   Scatter plots  did not indicate

any appropriate transformations, and only  1% of the variation

was explained by regression of  windowsill  lead on traffic counts

(Y =  0.0718 + 0.0016 X, where Y = windowsill lead and X =

traffic  count/1000).  Mean  lead content in windowsill wipe  lead

concentrations with corresponding traffic  counts are given  in

Appendix E.

                   Conclusions:   No significant relationship could

be found between lead in  windowsill wipes  and  traffic density.
                               1:17

-------
            e.    Hand-wipes



                 The lead measured in hand-wipes from 122




children was examined with respect to traffic counts and




blood lead  (see Appendix F).   The rationale for hand-wipe




analysis is that small children playing outside will come




in more direct contact with lead in soil and outside dust




and can transfer this lead into their bodies by putting




their hands into their mouths.  The frequency distribution




of the variable hand-wipe lead over all sites and for each




site are shown in Figures 58 and 59.  Hand-wipe lead values




were regressed on traffic counts with the results that only




a small amount of variation (6.2%) in hand-wipe lead was ex-




plained (y  = 7.35 + 0.20 X, where y - hand-wipe lead and X =




traffic count/1000).  The relationship between blood lead and




hand-wipe lead was also examined but only 0.3% of the varia-




tion in blocd lead was explained by lead on children's hands.




The means and confidence limits for hand-wipe lead  (yg/cm2)




over all sites and at each traffic density site are given in




Figure 60;  the mean hand-wipe lead concentration over all



sites was 9.3 + 0.65 yg/cm2.




                 Conclusions:   No substantial relationships




were found between lead in hand-wipe samples and traffic




counts or between blood lead and hand-wipe lead.
                            198

-------
     Figure  58.  Frequency Distribution of  Hand-wipe  Lead
lJ: MINTS
-} I .000)
-I::. HH'.i)
 .>. -v.
      ,'•;))
                                                                                        CT>
-u
AXIMIW
                        RY
  9.379
  7. I 73
I2I.
 41.410
                IF THiiY
:?v-  ,vii!^ *'s,  N'S op:i-r?wi

-------
     Figure  59.   Frequency Distribution of Hand-wipe Lead  at  each Traffic  Density.
                                   SU'R 2
                                                            '>n>:  3
                                                                                      SITR -1
.IIUPOINI'S
  !}l .
  4 i
  4-5. IHW)
  3-S.-IHH)
  27.
I 2.i)lM) ******
 V./1HM)M******
 ">. HUB) **************
 l.HOH) **************
 •I.*!   )
-3. -l
                                   *
                                   **
                                   **
                                   *
                                   ****
                                   M****
                                   **********
                                   *******
                                                            ***

                                                            **
                                                            M*
                                                            **********
                                                            *****
J")f)IJI> MRM'JS  ARI7

              7. 898
              A.7fjy
             45. (WM
             •W.Viit
              I.6H1
                         fiY M'S  IF  TIIRY COINCIOP  rtlTH *'S, N'S  OTHFRWISF

                                       9.177                    9.405
'\XI.MUM
                                      21.240
                                       2.77H
                                                                                      **
                                                                                      *
                                                                                      H***
                                                                                      +*
                                                                                      ****
                                                                                      ****
                                                                                          I2.99B
                                                                                          10.114
                                                                                          2PI.0HCI
                                                                                          41.410
                                                                 T.M.1PI
                                               200

-------
I'lgurc 60. Ilntvl-Wi|
                                       vs Traffic 'Tensity
                 20 -
                  15
        Hand-wipe
        Concentration
        dig/cm")
                         Sit.o 1    Site 2    511: 3

                                TRAFFIC DENSITY
                                              Ml,- 
-------
fingerprick and the remaining 81 were venipuncture samples.




For comparison of the two methods, both types were collec-




ted from some participants.   Eight participants allowed




both fingerprick and venipuncture samples to be taken on




the same day, and the blood lead levels were determined.




Venous blood lead vs fingerprick blood lead levels for each




of these participants is plotted in Figure 61.  The slope




of the fitted line is 1.24.   Using these 8 matched pairs,




the difference between the methods was examined using a




paired comparisons t-test and was not significant  (t=1.80,




P-0.11).  With log transformed data, the variances from




these two groups of 8 were homogeneous.  This means that




the blood lead levels from fingerprick samples were not




significantly higher or lower than matched venipuncture




samples.  However, the fingerprick method was significantly




more variable as indicated by a F test comparing the var-




iances of fingerprick samples (n = 154) and venipuncture




samples  (n = 81) from all children  (F = 2.09, P <.001).




This relationship is approximately the same in the smaller




sex-age-site groups of children.  Exclusion of the more




variable fingerprick samples would cause sample size in




most sex-site groups for children to be inadequate for




interpretation of the analysis;  therefore, the alternatives




were to either combine the methods or omit the venipuncture




samples for children using only fingerprick samples.  The




second alternative would also result in small samples in




                            202

-------
            Figure 61.  Venous Blood Lead vs Capillary Blood Lead

                     Samples from the Same Participant.
      a
      o
      o
        35 -•
        30 .-
        25 ..
        20
     .J cc

     E 3-

     u
        15 ..
        10 ..
         5 ..
                                        O
                  ^       10       15       2D       25       30


                             VENOUS BLOOD

                               jig/100 ml




some groups; i.e.,  Site 4.   Since both methods  were used



in every sex and site group  (for children) in approximately



the proportions mentioned  above (2  fingerprick:  1 venous),



it was  decided to  use the  combined  methods for  analysis.
                               203

-------
The site, sex, age, and blood analyses  for each  participant



are given in Appendix G.  Finger prick  blood  lead  concentra-



tions are listed in Appendix H.  Two blood samples were  taken



one week apart from each participant.   Evaluation  of  the



paired venous blood samples using a paired t-test  on  log



transformed data indicated there was no significant difference



between the two samples  (mean difference = 0.14  yg/100 ml,



t  = 0.85, P = 0.39); the same analysis  performed on finger-



prick blood lead samples showed no significant difference



in samples 1 and 2  (mean difference = 0.56, t =  0.21, P  =



0.84).  The two samples  from each participant were therefore



averaged for most of the statistical analyses.   The frequency



distribution of mean blood lead over all participants excluding



those eliminated from analysis due to other lead exposures (see



page 208) Is shown in Figure 62.  The frequency  distribution



of the mean blood lead for each age-sex  group and  for each



traffic density are shown in Figures 63  and 64, with the same



exclusions as above.  The overall frequency distribution was



significantly skewed to the right (P =  5 x 10~^) as were



most  of the smaller age-sex and site groups.  A  log trans-



formation caused the data to be normally distributed.   Blood



samples 1 and 2 were not averaged for the ANOVA as in the



other analyses.   In the ANOVA,  differences between samples



1  and  2 were  examined in each analysis.   For this  reason, the



frequency distribution for all blood samples  (ri =  708) was
                              204

-------
      Figure  62.   Frequency Distribution of  Mean Blood  Lead..
   t i.tHNI)*
   M.11M0)*
   II . IMOT)
  2/..K1I1)
  2l>. 0(1(1)**
  24.MH)***
  23.000)*
  P.'./Mfl) ******
  ? 1.1-100) ***
  2.1./100)****
  I J. 0(10) **********
  I i.000) ***********
  I /..Xlf1)) ****************
  I 6. /WO) *****************
  I5.;1H0) *********************
  I 4. ''(10) *******************************
  I 3.1100) *********************************
  I 2.''00)M **********************************
   I 1.0(10) ***************************************************
  I 1."H1H) **************************************
    J. .H1H) ***************************************
    !J. (1410) **************************************
    7.'^t10) ********************
    3. :)UO) *******************
    b.'KK-l) *********
    1..IOH)**
O'JTIP HF7\NS  \RE  D^IOl'I-D BY M-'S IF  rMRY COIMCIDE  iVIi'H  *'S, N'S OTHRI7WISK

 MFM'I        12.193
S.  ni^V.       't.ft?'!
    I         4 I 6. PI -.If)
      JM      Ti.(VM
      J^       4. 29H
          Figure 63.  Frequency Diltribution of Mean Blood Lead foe each Age and Sex iroup.
          MALES  LI' 1         MALES Of 49        F6MM.FS LT 9       FR"*LB!7  19-49       PEMALFS GT49
   MIDPOINTS
    37.5HH)
    3 I.HMO

    27..11)11)*

    24.'.(1)01*                                  **

    27!min>**                                 ****
    t •)». S'H*) ***               *                 *****
    H.,JM(1)***               ******            *****
    I ft. 5|W) *******            ****              M*****
    15.'1Mtf) '1 *******           **********         *******

    12. MO)*****             *************      *******
    1.1.500)*******            *******           *****
     j'.'KlO)***               *****             *
      l.'j'IH)

        MEANS ARC OBJOfEn  RY «'S  IF THEY COHClnE rtlTH •-'S, N'S nTtiCTWISF

   MEAN      15.424             12.929             lrt.714            UI.HA'i             1B.D34
   S. OKV.      4.a^6             1.14ft              5.515             1.1W4             3.J47
     .1       52.:)un             A4.,):w             44.mil)           lA5.rfirf             7I.DOH
   MAXIMUM     27.52H             19..'75             31.HHM            2I.5H5             IV. DHb
   MINIMUM      7.ftTi)             4.4U)              7.25rf             4.ft2H             4. 2-JM
                                         205

-------
examined and  found to  be normally distributed after log

transformation.   The distribution of  all fingerprick blood

lead  was also normal after log transformation.
      Fi'jura 64. Frequency distribution of mean blood lead at each traffic density,


         SITE I          SITE 2          SI IT. 3          SITF
     12. ilnnl*
     II.. HIM)
     2 /.Hl)0)
     2-S.MMH)
     21. MM)
     1 "5.
     I 1 ,
     I t.
     I 2.I
        ) ******* Ir*
        ) ****
       HUPI) *
       .IH11)
      1 MF:n<; ARE UPIOTRB nv n"; IF THEY COINCIDE ivirn *">, N'S
           12 27A
           •1 5HJ
 I 1.559
 1.94rt
I 12.HUM
 28.rt(M
 4.2011
                                                  76.ROD
                                                  25.lb«
                   The  distribution of traffic counts for

the  280 households of the participants is  shown below:

There  is no overlap among the sites  because these traffic

counts  were used to assign  households to sites.   The mean
                                206

-------
traffic  count, number  of  residences  in  a site  (N),  and

minimum  and maximum traffic counts are  given for  each  site

and over all sites.


         Frequency Distribution of Traffic Counts for Households for Participants by Sites
    MX; uju
    * i 't i H UM
          ARI; il^NOl HI
            76
           5V9
U,3ft(i

 '280
37,H5H
  155
                             WITH *'S, N'S
           J, l-j?
             70
           I 1,117?
           5,9 IH
I"., IP I
 I .9^7
  79
I9.MC10
                                                25,964
                                                 rt,7!4
                                                 I9,57fl
                  Conclusions:   The venipuncture and  finger-

prick  blood samples  for children were  combined for statis-

tical  analysis.  Normal distribution of the variable blood leac

can be achieved using  a logarithmic transformation.

                   (2)    Screening Variables

                         Tap water and house paint were samples

at each residence and  measured for lead content so that these

potential sources of lead would not confound the results of

the blood lead analyses.   Lead in tap  water was discussed in
                              207

-------
Section III B  3 b and no adjustments will be made for additional sources

of lead in water.

                             Lead measurements were made on 985 painted

surfaces in the  280 households  (two indoor and two outdoor at each house)

and are listed in Appendix I.  The means, their standard errors, and

sample sizes  for indoor paint lead and outdoor paint lead for each of  the

four traffic  density sites are given in Table 24; means and confidence

limits are plotted in Figure 65.   A measurement of 1.0 to 4.0 mg Pb/cm2

paint  (depending on the thickness  of the paint) corresponds to 1% lead

content  in paint.  Using the highest paint lead value obtained, forty-

four percent  (124/280) of the residences had a paint lead value over

1.0 mg/cm2.   Eight percent  (23/280) had a paint lead value over 4.0  mg/cm2

therefore, this  level was used as  a screening level  for excessive lead

in paint.  The blood lead levels of participant residing in a house  with

any paint value 4.0 mg/cm2 was examined  (39 participants, 12 of these  39

were children) .   Figure 66 shows the frequency distribution of blood lead

of participants  residing in houses with paint lead above and below 4.0

mg/cm2.   Blood lead of participants who had used pottery for food containe
          Table 24. Paint Lead Concentration (mg/cm2):  Means, their Standard Errors and Sample
      Sizes lor Indoor and Outdoor Paint Lead at each Traffic Site.

                                    Indoor Paint Lead          Outdoor Paint Lead
      Site I         Mean -SE           0.21 ±0.041               i 10 ±0 167
                   X                 152                     125

      Sl'-e ~         MeaniSE           0.22 ±0.070               1.04 ±0.148
                   N                 138                     108

      Si---          Mean-SE           0.44 ±0.137               1 22 == 0 209
                                    153                     121

                   Mean^SE           0.10 ±0.026               0.84*0.167
                   >•'                 108                     80
                                    208

-------
             Figure 65.  Paint Lead vs Traffic Density
        1.75-,
        1.50-
        1.25-
        1.00-
         .75.
   Paint
   Lead
   Concentra-
   tion
   (mg/cm2)


•indoor  .50-


1 Outdoor
         .25-
               Site 1
                            Site  2
                                             Site  3
                                                            Site 4
                                   209

-------
                 Figure 66. frequency Diatribition of Mean Blood Lead Levels of Participants
                        exposed to Paint Lead bolov and above 4.0 mg/cnz in Lheir homes.
                    LOPUNT                  HIPUNT
               MIDPOINTS
                n.000)
                32.«)i>0>*
                31. Until
                3.).0»0>*
                2s>.Ufr)M)*
                2-1.1)1)1))*
                27.HHH)
                24..]0i)>***
                21. DOHI*
                Zi.MM) ****
                2 I .H00) ***
                2j..Jl!0>*»**
                IM.IHI«>*****
                13.01)0) *****
                I 7.H»«) *****
                H.flHB) *
                I 1.000) *
                I 2. «Hfl)M
                t l.klWft)
                 ?.t!H0> *****.**
                 8. PtOH *********
                 /.H«H> ********
                 •S.VH10) ********
                 5. ao») *******
****
*****
               uDOUP MFANS ARE DS^nrRD BY 'i'S If THEY COINCIDE iH FH *'S, N'S OTHER.IISR

                «E*N    12.155                   12.140
               S. JEV.   4.5U                    5.061
                 N    310.000                   tiA.iWO
               MAXIMUM   31.551)                   .13.1100
               >4IMIMUM   4.2VO                    4.A20
 (47),  had  hobbies  or occupations involving lead (44  and

 9) ,  and children who often played near the street  (13)  were

 also examined.  Because  there  was some overlap, the  total

 number of  participants  examined was  127.   Each log  (blood

 lead)  for  each of  these  participants was  compared to the

mean for that age-sex-site group.   Only those  which  were

 higher than the mean were tested using Dixon's test  for

 extreme values:  BX =  (xn -  x)/a(28), where  x   = the blood

lead measurement,  x = the mean for  that age-sex-site group,

and  s  - an independent  estimate of  the standard deviation.

The  standard deviation  of all  venous blood samples  (n =  708)

was  used as the independent  estimate of a.   The analogous

                                 210

-------
fingerprick standard deviation (n = 160) was used for the



fingerprick blood samples.  Because these are screening




variables, a very conservative level of a (0.10) was set



which rejected cases greater than 1.3 standard deviations



above the mean.  This is a one-tailed test,  because the



alternative hypothesis is that the mean of these blood lead



values is higher due to this additional exposure to lead.




                       Twenty-nine blood samples from 20



of the 127 participants were found to be outliers (P<0.10).



This means that 29 blood lead measurements were greater



than 1.3 standard deviations (one-tailed test)  above the



mean for their respective age-sex-site group.  From a table



of areas of a normal curve, we see that 9.68% or 84 of the



868 blood samples are expected to be this deviant in a



normally distributed variable and we have examined approxi-



mately 30% of the total participants (127 of 441).  There-



fore, more stringent requirements for rejection were sought.



Ten of these participants were found to have significantly



high blood lead in both samples.   These 10 were rejected.



Their blood lead measurements and probabilities are shown



in Table 25.



                       Conclusions; Six screening variables




(tap water, house paint, pottery, hobbies, occupations,



and playsites near street) were examined as additional



sources of lead exposure.  The blood lead levels of 127




participants who could have been exposed to lead from




                             211

-------
           Table 25. Results of Test for Extreme Values (Dixon1 s Bi Test) on
         Blood Samples of Participants Potentially Exposed to Other Lead Sources

         ID #  Site  Sex Age  Exposure13  Meana  Bl lc   P   Bl 2    P  _df_

         2412   1    M   55    2,3      14.55   25.38 .067  25.21  .070 28

         0076   1    F    31    1,2,5    8.98   18.73 .022  27.50  .001 95

         0276   1    F    38    2        8.98   17.00 .040  15.69  .063 95

         0067   1    F    42    5        8.98   16.42 .049  16.07  .055 95

         5397   2    F    54    2        9.97   15.74 .106  19.95  .031 41

         9326   2    F    66    2        9.97   19.47 .036  17.58  .062 41

         5498   3    F     1    5        15.93   28.50 .093  40.60  .019 30

         5626   3    F    31    1,2,3    10.15   17.01 .078  16.23  .099 93

         3311   3    F    54    1        8.96   16.25 .053  18.73  .024 42

         7821   4    F    36    1        9.30   15.16 .090  19.27  .024 74
         a  antilog of mean of log y

          Exposure Code
         1 Paint
         2 Hobby
         3 Job
         4 Playj near street
         5 Pottery

         c Bl 1  blood sample 1,  Bl 2  blood sample 2
one  or more of  these sources were  examined,  and 10  partici-

pants were rejected  as outliers.

                     (3)    Blood Lead  vs Traffic Density

                           Two way ANOVA was used to  test  for

differences in  blood lead among sites and among samples

(1 and 2)  for each age-sex group.   The  ANOVA was  mixed-

model with sites  fixed and samples as random effects.   Inter-

action and error  mean squares  were pooled for testing  the

                                 212

-------
fixed effects according  to the rules proposed by Bancroft(^1).

The  results  are  shown in  Table 26.   There  are significant

differences  among sites  at P<0.05  in all sex-age groups

except  males >49.  Wo significant  differences between samples

1 and 2  are  seen in  any  groups nor  are  there any signifi-

cant interactions (sites x samples).

         Table 26. Two-Way ANOVA of the  Effects of Sites and Samples
                on Lcg(Blood Lead) for Each Age-Sex Group
        Males < 9

        Source

        Sites
        Samples
        Sites^Samp
        Error
 DF
       MS
             F Ratio   Prob.   Nonsignificant Sites
  3   0.1034   4.2033   0.0076
  1   0.0017   0.0670   0.7963
  3   0. 0027   0. 1080   0. 9553
 98   0. 0252
                          3 < 1 < 4 < Z
       Males > 49

       Sites        3   0.0377
       Samples      1   0.0002
       Sites*Samp   3   0.0114
       Error      121   0.0169
             2.2575   0.0850
             0.0139   0.9064
             0.6736   0.56Q8
                               3 < 2 < 4 < 1
        Females < 9

        Sites
        Samples
        SLtes*Samp
        Error
  3
  1
  3
121
0. 0868
0.0601
0.0015
0.0263
3. 3806   0. 0205
2.2891   0.1329
0.0580   0.Q816
                               4 < 3 < 1 < 2
        Females 19-49

        Sites        3   0.0807
        Samples     1   0.0126
        Sites-Samp   3   0.0065
        Error      328   0.0201
             4.4039   0.0076
             0.6270   0.4290
             0.3251   0.8072
                               1 < i < 2 < 3
        Females > 49

        Sites
        Samples
        Sites#Samp
        Error
  3   0.0685   3.3438   0.0211
  1   0.0044   0.2111   0.6467
  3   0. 0068   0. 3293   0. 8042
136   0.0208
                           < 4 < 2 < 1
                                   213

-------
                        The mean of  each site  (with  samples

1 and 2 pooled)  were ranked from smallest to largest,  and

multiple comparisons (SHK procedure)  were used to determine

groups of site  means which were not significantly different

at P<0.05.  These nonsignificant sets of sites are  under-

lined in Table  26.   There appears to  be no pattern  of  in-

creasing blood  lead with increasing traffic density (site

number) at these traffic levels.  The back-trans'formed means

 (antilog of mean of log x), their confidence limits (L^

and L2), and  sample sizes (N)  are given in Table 27.   Mean

blood lead vs.  traffic density is plotted for each  age and

sex group in  Figure 67.

                        The relationship of individual  blood

lead values to  corresponding actual traffic counts  was ex-

amined using  regression analysis.   The blood lead concen-
             . 3!ood Lead Concentrations 'us/100ml): Means, Confidence Limits (L and L ), and
              l f-r ..-ich A^e-Sax Grouo at each Site (Computed from Log (Blood Lead) and'Sack-Tramformed).
               \lejn
               L
12.
; !
• '•
3.J
13
; 2 .
1 5 .
-7
14
13
16.
4S
i
i
*
"
:o.
J

11
dO
20
32

•(,
35
1 ~

n
37
33

-7
20
i8

7b
75
d7

16
14.
18.
34
12
11.
13.
36
13
16.
21
30
10.
q.
10.
70
VJ.
3.
10.
38
48
}0
23

42
08
'I

58
26
23

07
>0
^0

3 5
37
45

11.
9.
14.
12
11.
10.
12.
44
14.
13.
16.
36
10.
Q
10.
•'2
i.
1 .
9.
41
67
38
51

56
52
71

do
22
78

05
44
69

6 7
6^
76

15.
12.
17.
22
12.
11.
14.
22
13.
10.
17.
15
9.
8.
9.
73
8.
8.
9.
24
07
94
54

53
08
17

60
77
19

14
47
87

91
03
89

                              214

-------
                Fi
-------
to be significantly higher than either adult female group



(P<0.001)  and female children to be significantly higher



than male children at a probability approximately equal



to 0.05 (ts = 1.71 as opposed to critical value = 1.65).



These were one-tailed tests.



                 Conclusions:  Blood lead was significantly



higher in children than in adults for both males and females.



With regard to sex differences in blood lead, female children



were slightly higher than male children, and male adults



were significantly higher than female adults.  There were



no differences between middle-age and older female groups.



           b.    FEP and Hernatocrit



                 FEP determinations have been shown to



be related to lead exposure and have been proposed as a



simple and reliable prescreening test for undue lead ab-


                                                (25^
sorption especially at levels above 39 yg/100ml.v  '



Hematocrits have also been suggested as a less expensive



and more efficient method of detecting lead exposure.



                 The frequency distributions of the FEP



and HCT are shown over all sites, for each site (ages and



sexes combined), and for each age and sex group (traffic



sites combined)  in Figures 68-73.  Each FEP and HCT value



represents the average of two samples from one participant.



Regression analysis was used to examine the relationship
                             218

-------
                    Table 28. Two-Way ANOVA of the Effects of
           Sex and Age on Log(Blood Lead) at Sites 1, 2.. 3, 4, and All-Sites
           Site 1

           Source

           Sex
           Age
           Sex*Age
           Error
   SS
 0. 0240
 0.1047
 0.2874
 3. 4837
DF

  1
  1
  1
150
                      MS
0.0240
0. 1047
0.2874
0. 0232
 F Ratio

  1.0327
  4.5074
 12. 3767
Prob.

0.3112
0. 0354
0.0006
           Site 2

           Sex
           Age
           Sex* Age
           Error
 0.0427
 1. 5161
 0.2595
 2.7189
  1
  1
  1
134
0. 0427
1. 5161
0.2505
0.0203
  2.1048
 74.7177
 12.7911
0. 1492
0. 0000
0.0005
           Site 3

           Sex
           Age
           Sex*Age
           Error
 0. 0022
 0.3624
 0.3354
 3.0016
  1
  1
  1
129
0.0022
0.3624
0. 3354
0.0233
  0.0945
 15.5735
 14.4137
0. 7590
0.0001
0. 0002
           Site 4

           Sex
           Age
           Sex* Age
           Error
 0. 1854
 0.3494
 0.0541
 1.4726
  1
  1
  1
 79
0.1854
0.3494
0.0541
0. 0186
  9.9484
 18.7444
  2.9043
0. 0023
0.0000
0. 0923
           All-Sites

           Sex
           Age
           Sex* Age
           Error
 0.2115
 2.3628
 0.7658
11.5633
  1
  1
  1
504
0.2115
2.3628
0'. 7658
0.0229
  9.2171
102.9859
 33.3784
0.0025
0. 0000
0. 0000
                              Neither  sex had  consistently  higher

blood  lead  levels  over all  age  groups.   Using  t-tests,  the

age groups  were examined  individually-   Adult  males  were shown
                                     217

-------
                  (4)    Sex  and Age Difference in Blood
                        Lead

                        Previous studies have shown that males

as a group maintained higher blood lead levels than females living in

the same area with much the same external lead exposures and that children

had higher levels than adults ^ (32) _  Two-way ANOVA (fixed effects)

were used at each site  and  for all sites with sexes  (male,

female) as rows and  ages(<9, >49)  as columns to determine

whether the same relationships were true for these  data

(Table 28).  Because the  design must be balanced for  this

analysis, the  females  19-49 group was not included.   The

interaction term  (sex  X age) was a highly significant

(P<0.001) at sites  1,  2,  3, and all-sites.  In Figure 67,

we see the explanation  for  the significant interaction:

the lead values for  male  adults were higher than for  female

adults; but for children,  the  females were higher  than the

males.  In Site 4,  the  males were higher than females in

both age groups; therefore, the interaction term in the

ANOVA was not  significant.   In all five ANOVA, the  terms

for differences among  ages  were significant at P<0.05 (in

spite of the slight  overlap at Site 1) or at P<0.01 (sites

2, 3, 4, and all-sites).   Because the interaction  involved

the sexes and  not the  ages, we can safely generalize  that

age groups were significantly  different; i.e., blood  lead

for children was significantly higher than for adults in

both male and  female groups.


                             216

-------
           Figure 68.  Frequency Distribution FLIP
           ODD)
        6 t
         -1. .1110)
        47.300)*
        I i.ihW)*
        t }.")',W ***
 -Kid)
 ;H1H)
 PK1d)
 ,1;1;1)
              *****
              ******
              ***************
              ********************<*
              *****************************
              ********* t*************************
              ************ *********************
              M ******************* ************* ************
              ********* *********** * A *************
              ******************************
              *** V*** ** V********** *******
              ********************
              * ** ****** ***
              **
              *****
         I 1
/."i
           .)(1!1)
           "ill")
              )
            »F\rlS ARF
                           BY »"S IF THEY COIHCinE WITH *'S, N'S OTHERWISF
        Ml- \fl
       S.  ih'V.
       'I [ i [MUM
                 7?
                 U)
between FEP and blood lead resulting in the equation, Y = 71.96 + 0.07 X,

where Y = FEP concentration  (yg/100 ml RBC) and X = blood lead (ug/100 ml)

Only  0.01% of the variation in FEP was explained (R2 = 0.0001)  by this

regression.  This is consistent with the findings of Piomelli  (25)  who

reported no significant relationship between FEP and blood lead levels

when  only the samples with lead levels up to 39 ug/100 ml were considered

(R =  0.02).  Although we did not  find any blood lead levels above 40

yg/100 ml (see Appendix G) , the blood lead in children was higher than in

adults.   Therefore,  FEP concentration was regressed on blood lead from

children only with the same result:   only 0.3%  was explained  (Y = 61.07 +

0.42  X,  where Y = FEP concentration in yg/100 ml RBC, and X =  blood lead

in yg/100 ml) .   Examination of  scatter  plots  of X  and  Y  and
                                    219

-------
              1'iyure 69.  irequency Distribution of FEP at each Traffic Density.

              siru:  i                sm- 2
                                                                       SITE -1
        16 3.1100)*
        I6I .000)
        lb4.l7ll.1M)
        14 /.'1H0)
        I .1:-1.000)*
        I H.V100)*
        I r>.'100>**
        i 12.000)**
U)l
 9.-(.
 9 I .
 H t.
   . 000) ******
   .:100) ********
   . ,)00) ***********
   .000) *************
  7 /.1100)M*********
  /•.1. 000) *********
  63.01H3) ********
  56. MM) *******
  49.000) ***•*
  42. ',11)0 )*****
  35.HOHJ*
  2;i.00H>
   .000)
   .0110)
   .000)
   ,1.0  )*
  -7.000)
GDOIJP MEAilS  \Ri= il':NnrEri ilY
 'Ul.OUB
 24.9-1M
 •J 1. 0;<:i
167. s.i,1
         21.
         I t.
          7.
                                    ******
                                    *******
                                    **********
                                    ***** *****
                                    M****
                                    ************
                                    ***********
                                    *******
                                    ******
                                    ***
                                    **
                                    *
                                    **
                                  J|- illl-Y COINCinR lU'l
                                      /'). I 111
                                      .V. /V i
                                        **
                                        *+*
                                        *****
                                        *******
                                        ** **********
                                        ***********
                                        !(*******
                                        ***********
                                        *************
                                        *******
                                        ********
                                        *
                                        **
       MXIMILM
                                                    6S.64 1
                                                    21.HHV
                                                           I 44. l
                                                           2 I . '
+***
***
*****
******
!f* **********
********
*****
****
*****
*
                                                                         /H.4il7
                                                                         2S.I49
                                                                         ujV.OHH
                                                                        179. WO
 residuals  did not  indicate  that transformations  would im-

 prove  the  fit.

                               The  relationship of hematocrits  and

 blood  lead was  examined.   Only 3.7%  of  the variation in hema-

tocrits was  explained by the regression on blood lead (Y =  38.64 + 0.22 X,
        *
where Y = HCT and X = blood lead in  yg/100 ml).  Scatter plots and plots

of  residuals were examined, and further transformations and analyses were
                                       220

-------
     Figure 70.  Frequency Distribution of FUt1 for Crtch Acjc-3cx Croup.

       MAI.KS ! 1'  9        '(M.l-'i 01' 49        l-l"'< M.i-"S LT ')       i^'
                                                               19-49
                                                                         H-"Al.i-S GT49
  .l.iHU))
   I.OHM)
   I. KIM)
   i. 1(10)
   j.'KKD*
  I /. 1(1(1) *V*
  i j.'l'Kl) **
  I I. '11111) *
       **
  • 1. OC'dl) **

   l.HIKD*
   i. )00>*
   1. 1  )
   l.lJllll)
   l.OIH-1)
 P MKANS ARE l)l:K)On;0 RY M'S  IF THEY COINCIDE iVIFM -*"~<,  N'

                       7(1.929            67.H41
 •V.    .>R.9'1H           2ft. I74            10. 3()S
'I      I 7.'mo           64.'100            16*. 00 1
'UN I
      -i7.71r>
      .>R.9 tM
      I 7.'mo
MUM    l'.17.'-vM
MUM    I.'. .1 10
                                                      ******* IT* C        ******
                                                      * k-*** ****** ***+**27 ********

                                                      * k 
-------
             Fiyure 71.   Frequency Distribution of  IICT.


       'I IMI'OIH l'!j
         ';..'. -HIM) *
         '•) I. !),«))
            OOH) ***
            MOtt) ****
            illllJ)
                ) ****,*********
                 **********
                ) *****************
                ) *************************
                ) **********************************************
                ) **********************************************
                ) M * * **** * * A i* A** * *** »:*•***** *********
                I***********************************
                 ***************************************
                 ***** ************************************
                ) **********************
                ) *** ** *> ** **
                ) *************
                ) *****
           .OillD *
           . mil)
           . .HIM)
           . "1110)
           |'  "1F4NS
                      (I;  I)|-N(1|T,|)
                                      M'S Il;  THffY COINCIDfT  WITH  *'S, N'S OTIIKDWISF
                    •111.
          fJ         1/V.IV10
       MAXIMUM      'il.V.HI
       nguro /i.  frequency Distribution of IICT at each Traffic Density.

       SHE I                Ml i.  >               -iHF I
 'I I ..
 4 l.i-li
 ./M.'MIM)
 .^ /. .llMt
'ct'ir MI AUS AKK ui-.iiori-[) ny
'! *******
******
*******
                                (J(IINCII)I: ,11111 *'S, II "i
                                                                       W.64S
                                               222

-------
            riguro 73.   Frequency Distribution of I1CV for each Afjo-Gcx Group.


          HAI.^S Lf 9           MALES Of 49          I-GJALE--, LT 9          FMM.I-S  19-49
                                                                                               R-MALGS C'l 49
MIDPOINTS
  Sl.tWM)
  •jU.fHH)
  49.HMHI
  41.111101
  41.HHHI
  4H.HOH) **
  1V.H0M) ******
  H.HUH) *****
  17. HUM) II******
  M.HH0J ***
  lr>.HU0) ***
                               ***
                               *****
   )I. UWO) ***                                        **
   1J.10M)                      *
   II.H(W)
   W.IWP)
   JJ.11IIH)
OIIOIII' HI:AMS AI1E UE-iOIKD RV M"~.  II  THIJY  COI'ICIIIE  WITH *'S,
 MI-Afl
s. nsv
IV.2^7
 I.7M
17.(Mil
                                  44.
 •t'1.171
  ?.H?9
I A'i.llOH
 -IV.IV-lvl
 11.,I'M
41.117
 .1. MO
oV.il.U
           Ta:sLe 29.  FEP (L^/ 100 ml RBC 's )   Meana,  :heir Standard Errors,  and Sample Sizes (N) lor each
     Aye  - 5*x Group ac each Site.

>.[ean ~SE
N
Mean = SE
N
Mean ^SE
N
Mean ^SE
N
Mean - SE
X
Site 1
34 7-12. OO
1 1
16 . b ~ ~ . ib
n
66.4=3 J0
1 J
34. 9 ^3. 87
>1
78 3=5 44
41
Site 2
59.5=7 05
21
70. 5 = 4. 78
36
60. 1 * 11. 24
10
80. 3 i 3. 64
77
73 7=4 36
38
Site 3
50 3 =19. 69
4
66. a =4. 90
44
65 6 i 14. 5
9
63. 7 ±3. 56
92
68 8 =6 04
41
Site
38. 5
6
76. 5
22
68. 5
4
68. 5
73
72. 3
23
4
= 9. 27

= 9. 14

i26.63

±2. 80

= 7 40

                                                     223

-------
            Table 30. Hemacoc r-.t |"»)- Means and Their Standard Errors and Simple Sizes (N) for
          Each A^e - Sex Group it each Site.
                          	      Site i      Site 3      Site 4

                  Mean - 5E
                  Mean -S
                  N
                  Mean =S
                  N
          Females ^ 4li  Mean -S
                  X
3o 6-0. il
25
42. 5 -0. 56
28
37.5 ~0 38
31
40.4 0.34
04
40. 3 i-0. 41
41
37.
33
45.
36
37
28
40.
79
41
40
3 -i-0. 34

3 i-0. 32

0 *0. 43

8 to. 41

9 ±0. 68

37. 0
11
44. 5
40
36. 9
34
40.5
90
40. 8
39
±0.

*0.

±0.

±0.

=0.

65

51

37

35

.59

36.
21
43.
22
36.
18
39.
76
41.
23
9 *0. 34

4 *1.08

4 to. 47

7 ±0.32

0 ±0.51

           c.    Carbon Monoxide (CO)

                Carbon monoxide levels in the blood were

determined on  a subsample of the study population.  From

the venipuncture blood specimens collected an attempt  was

roade to  select  an approximately equal number of specimens

for males  and  females,  smokers and norsmokers for each of

the four traffic density  sites.  This resulted In CO deter-

minations  being made  on 201 blood specimens from 163 persons.
Thirty-eight of these samples were second samples from the

same person.   The frequency distribution of the ?01 samples

is shown in Figure 7^-   Two peaks can be seen in the

histogram:  one at 0.1$ which represents the nonsmokers

and one at 0.8% for the smokers.  Before a relationship

between traffic levels and %CC could, be determined, the
smokers were separated from the nonsmokers.  CO content  in

blood samples  from 141 participants who do not smoke was

analyzed for differences  among the four traffic density  sites

using a Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance and found  to be

not significant (H =  2.237, X2 _05(3) =7.815).  The nonpara-

metric test was used  after transformations did not correct

                               224

-------
skewness  of the data.   The means and their standard  errors

and  sample sizes are  given below:



                            Mean +  SE      N

                 Site  1   0.136 + 0.0107  42

                 Site  2   0.138 + 0.0125  32

                 Site  3   0.122 + 0.0088  37

                 Site  4   0.139 + 0.0114  30


                     All  concentrations (for  nonsmokers  and

smokers are given in Appendix G.

                     Conclusions;   There was  no significant

difference in  CO content  in the blood of persons who  do

not  smoke and  who live at four  different traffic densities.
      Figure 74.  Frequency Distribution of Carbon Monoxide in Blood.
 0. o ) *****
 0.10) **************##******#
-------
          d.    Blood Lead Levels and Cigarette Smoking




               Smokers, exsmokers, and nonsmokers were  ex-




amined for differences in blood lead levels.  Participants




from all traffic densities were pooled for this analysis,




since increasing traffic density had no detectable  effect




on blood lead at the traffic levels in this study.  Data for




adult males and adult females were examined separately,




however, because their blood lead levels were shown to  be




different.  Single classification ANOVA was used to test for




differences among mean blood lead levels for the three




groups:  smokers, exsmokers, and nonsmokers.  The blood




lead value for each participant was the average of  two  blood




lead measurements.  A log transformation was used on  the




variable blood lead to meet the assumptions for this  test;




therefore, the means discussed below are geometric  means.




               For the adult females, blood lead levels were




11.2, 9.2, and 8.7 yg/lOOml for smoker, exsmokers,  and  nonsmokers,




respectively.   The differences were highly significant  (P =




1.1 x 10 ~8).   Multiple comparisons tests (SNK procedure) showed




no significant difference between exsmokers and nonsmokers;




however, blood lead levels in smokers were significantly higher




than in either exsmokers or nonsmokers.  The log (base  10)




transformed frequency distribution, means, standard deviations




and sample sizes are presented in Figure 75.  The backtransformed




(geometric)  mean for each group is given in parentheses.
                           226

-------
          Figure •'  frequency DiSLnbatlon c: -
                 Groups of Adult Fe.Ti.iles j- -
-p "ariabii-' blO'-a Lrad 1-"' Three Smoking
 the Pesults -f ASOVA a-no-.g these Groups.
                                            .!.'.»•; (8.7)
                                            i. i "n
               •'. J^. (9.6)
               '.Mi
                                                       0.000000011
                For the adult  males, mean blood lead levels

for smokers,  exsmokers,  and nonsmokers were  12.9,  13.1

and 11.5  yg/100 ml, respectively.   Although  these  means were

not significantly different  (P = 0.20), a positive relation-

ship can  be  seen between blood lead levels in  males and

cigarette smoking.  Blood  lead levels for smokers  and ex-

smokers are  greater than for  nonsmokers.  Figure 76 shows

the log transformed frequency distribution for these three

groups.

                Conclusions:   A highly significant  association

between smoking and blood  lead levels was seen in  adult females

Blood  lead levels among  female smokers was significantly

greater than  for exsmokers and nonsmokers.   The relationship
                              227

-------
       Figure 76.  Frequency Distribution of the Variable Blood Lead in Three Smoking
              Groups of Adult Males and the Results of ANOVA among these Groups.
           I? (12.9)
                             ) (13.1)
           I , 2H.1
           t!. /S44
                                         *****
                                         M+-*
                                            I . !'» i (11.5)
                                            1. I -I.1
                                         Hi A-; '-/)•) -L T p :j,\ fin

                                            I.1" i|  I .ft1T>
between blood lead levels  for  the three groups was  as

follows:   smokers>exsmokers>nonsmokers.  In  adult males,

differences  among  groups were  not statistically significant;

however, smokers and exsmokers had similar blood lead

levels which were  higher than  those  for nonsmokers.
                               228

-------
      5.     Multivariate Analyses




            In earlier sections of this report, each variable




 was examined either singly or for a relationship with one




 other variable.   The variation in blood lead is here ex-




 amined for a relationship to the combination of all environ-




 mental variables and other characteristics of the partici-




 pants and their  homes obtained through the questionnaire




 information.  Twenty-five independent variables were



 used in a least  squares regression analysis with




 blood lead as the dependent variable.  Separate analyses




 were made for children and for adults using the same vari-




 ables with the exception of number 22 (smoking for adults




 and hand-wipe lead for children).  The 25 variables and




 regression coefficients for each least squares regression




 analysis are listed in Table 31.  The analyses estimated




 the amounts of variation in blood lead that is accounted




for by the simultaneous effect of the environmental and




other variables.   Simple correlation coefficients among all




of the 26 variables for adults and for children are presented




in Table 32.




             For  children,  21,7% of  the variation  about  the




mean blood  lead  can be  attributed to  the  linear effects  of




the variables  listed  in Table  31.   This result  is obtained




using ordinary least  squares  regression.   The  regression




coefficient  associated  with  traffic count is  negative but not
                             229

-------
Table 31. Variables and Regression Coefficients  for Least Squares
         Regression Analysis
                                              Regression Coefficients
Number          Name

  0
  1        Traffic Count
  2        Occupational Lead Exposure
  3        Glazed Pottery
  4        Screened for Lead Absorption
  5        Diagnosed as Lead Poisoned
  6        Cooking Appliances
  7        Age of House
  8        Education of Head of Household
  9        Paint Lead - Indoor
  10        Paint Lead - Indoor
  11        Paint Lead - Outdoor
  12        Paint Lead - Outdoor
  13        Distance from Road
  14        Sex
  15        Age
  16        Length of Residence
  17        Exposure to Lead Through Hobby
  18        Hours Away from Home
  19        Hours in Car/Bus
  20        Anemia
  21        Sick
  22        Smoke  (Adult) Handwipe (children)
  23        Tapwater
  24        Soil
  25        Indoor Dust
  26        Blood Lead
Children
17.33
0.37
3.95
•0.46
1.92
3.36
• 3.68
0.09
0.91
• 0.14
0.31
• 0.16
0.05
• 0.01
• 1.90
•0.34
0.11
• 3.72
• 0.07
0.21
•2.86
1.74
• 0.02
• 6.51
• 0.00
42.00
Adults
11.55
- 0.17
- 0.91
0.62
1.98
- 4.25
- 0.86
- 0.01
0.13
- 0.13
0.18
- 0.07
- 0.06
- 0.00
2.76
0.03
- 0.02
- 0.33
0.02
0.02
- 0.68
1.22
- 1.15
- 0.42
0.00
- 4.77
significantly different from zero at  the 5%  level.  A  negative

coefficient here  indicates  that when  the other 24 variables

are held constant that blood lead tends to decrease as traffic

count  increases.   Since the coefficient is not significant

this means that if we exclude the variable traffic count from

the regression we can expect that the resulting R2 will not

decrease significantly from 21.7%.
                                230

-------
Table 32.
Simple Correlation Coefficients Among All Variables for Children and
Adults.



to
CO
1— '










llil l.liii
1-000
.00)
-.in)
.Ob2
.105
.045
I/I
. 1 JU
-.011
- . oy6
-.OaO
-.025
015
.\2U
-.oy7
.019
.064
-.006
.052
.211
.2)2
-.OH
-.020
.1 JO
-.020
n
1 ooo
. 122
. ib5
- Ij45
"73
-.163
-.000
-.OJ3
-.it;
-.020
-. 166
-.025
-.005
-.031
JO 2
- . 0'J5
- . O'J >
.080
-.12)
.Ibl
.0)1
. JUd
-.114
.158
1.000
-.Ob4
- .052
.9b4
.077
211
.113
- Oil
.001
.0/1
-.'141
- . 033
. 115
.oj;
.072
- . 07b
- 0'J3
-.14)
. iy4
.125
.007
-.127
-.053
1.000
.623
.050
. 14)
.126
- 012
. 1 JO
-.123
-.0)9
all
-.045
-,1)J
-.022
- , Ob9
- . 092
-.055
- . ube
.050
.201
-.053
-.0/4
.m
1 . 000
.•m
.'I2b
.j)b
-.329
-. Jbl
-.077
-. 151
. ill
-. J64
-.011
-.114
- 12b
. 139
-.114
-. J55
. Jbb
. J'35
-. )4b
-. 163
.147
1.000
-.005
.503
.047
.004
-.ota
.049
-.073
-.366
.015
.022
.oyi
.005
-.13b
-,43'J
-.250
.041
-.121
-.205
-.039
l.UOO
.009
.064
.259
.301
.408
.040
-.022
.200
-.159
-.246
-.011
-.073
-.261
.107
.025
.045
.124
.110
1.000
.095
-.013
-.002
.Ib7
-.016
- 195
.061
.055
-.OJJ
-.027
-.200
-.331
-.044
.190
-.230
-.234
.044
1.000
-.067
-.039
-.Ob5
-.065
.018
-.066
-.021
-.065
-.001
-.052
-.073
-.031
.090
-.053
-.077
-.024

-.061
-.076
-.037
.044
-.061
-.145
-.026
.067
-.01J
.013
.21D
-.004
-.093
-.055
.233
.out

1.000
.491
.193
.058
.064
.079
-.057
-.062
.117
-.002
.007
.010
-.0)3
-.021
.010
-.059

1.000
.080
-.072
.105
.142
-.023
-.15U
.11U
-.028
-.011
.146
.057
.060
.157
.059


1.000
.061
.04g
.188
-.013
-.082
-.011
-.123
-.109
-.169
.065
-.071
-.125
-.030



1.000
-.135
-.109
-.08)
-.060
.035
.196
-.120
.068
-.011
-.045
.011
-.167



1.000
.325
.045
.249
-.070
-.052
.140
-.050
-.000
-.062
.048
-.128



1.000
.021
.300
-.056
-.075
-.176
.091
.128
-.054
-.044
-.058




1.000
.093
.194
-.024
-.038
-.004
.133
-.075
-.063
.002





1.000
.150
-.058
-.007
-.215
.116
-.188
-.059
-.163






1.000
-.056
.079
-.059
.070
-.004
.051
.088







1.000
.145 1.000
.007 .127 I. 000
-.082 -.02) -.044 1.000
.024 .102 .079 -.133 1.000
.016 .117 .199 -.190 .029 l.OOO
-.177 .058 .169 .Oil .029 .103
                                                     (continued)

-------
Table  32.  (continued)


M
U>
NJ










Alulls
1.000
-.05)
-.200
-.IXJ/
.015
.028
-.201
.0-10
.009
-.029
-.097
.053
.071
-057
.056
-.012
-.042
.058
-.002
-.044
-.085
-.Ml
.113
.015
-.005
-.006
i
1.000
.015
.17U
.063
.056
.030
-.112
-.047
-.057
.038
-.013
.052
.116
.11?
.129
.071
-.046
-.058
-.031
-.081
-.097
-.019
.045
-.010
.005
1.000
-.065
-.04U
.069
.070
.074
-.001
-.017
-.023
-.076
.002
-.042
-.028
.033
.107
.132
.003
•122
.036
.059
-.003
.034
.121
.018
I.CLIO
.740
.036
-.042
-.008
-.027
.091
.067
-.049
.007
.053
.014
-.061
-.063
-.103
-.106
-.044
-.052
-.137
-.006
-.001
.011
.021
1.000
.027
.038
-.052
-.030
.158
.107
-.055
.017
.061
019
-.008
-.047
-.089
-.117
-.039
-.038
-.030
.004
.054
.036
-.066
1.000
-.147
.181
.004
-.067
-.055
.050
.018
.007
.050
-.003
-.060
.040
.061
-.026
.055
-.048
.023
-.133
-.027
-.018
1.000
.050
.121
.236
.248
.267
.129
.110
.112
.298
.048
-.150
-.099
-.050
.011
.025
-.117
.207
.OU9
.021
1.000
.073
-.068
-.082
.062
.069
-.112
-.198
-.090
.083
.082
.053
.042
-.126
.095
.041
.025
-.024
-.065
1.000
.051
-.004
.044
-.092
-.015
-.043
-.034
-.001
-.032
-.058
-.014
-.030
.027
-.002
.003
-.030
-.045
1.000
.070
.060
.023
.000
.005
.079
.010
.018
-.030
-.013
-.002
.020
-.023
.062
-.009
.021
1.000
.359
.072
.041
-.013
.025
-.185
-.133
-.053
.028
-.027
-.015
-.051
.108
.060
-.043

1.000
.152
.041
,028
.060
-.043
-.042
-.004
-.061
.035
-.06L
-.013
.057
.011
.000


1.000
.161
.191
.Ul
.021
-.067
.004
.163
-.058
-.017
-.057
.004
-.022
.060


1.000
.606
.34£
.137
-.043
-.040
-.316
-.113
.008
-.029
-.016
-.002
.388


1.000
.594
-.012
-.052
-.042
-.263
-.152
.129
-.018
-.073
-.051
.268



1.000
.116
-.020
-.120
-.178
-.064
.089
-.061
.012
-.025
.121




1.000
.008
-.002
.007
-.005
-.077
-.011
-.OJ2
-.041
.010





1.000
.408
.013
.029
.053
.039
-.101
.017
.037






1.000
-.029
.073
.024
-.022
-.062
-.057
.047







1.000
.008 1.000
-.004 -.118 1.000
.082 -.018 -.012 1.000
.038 -.040 -.074 -.028 1.000
-.054 -.046 .081 -.005 .061 1.000
-.199 .092 -.215 .048 .068 -.063
                                                               1.000

-------
          Ridge regression is a biased estimation technique




which in theory can provide regression coefficients that are




closer to their true value on the average than those coefficients




resulting from least squares regression.   This method of analysis




yielded the fact that_the sign of the traffic count coefficient




did not change to a positive value for the set of possible ridge




coefficients (ridge trace)  computed by Hocking's program.  Evident-




ly, the reason that the sign of this coefficient is negative is




not due to the independent variables being highly correlated.




          Variable selection methods developed by Hocking




selected the variable traffic count only after many other variables




had been included in the regression equation.  In no case was  traffic




count selected before 14 of the other 25 variables had been selected.




In this sense the traffic count is an important determinant of blood




lead only when many other more important variables are held constant.




          Apparently, when traffic count is measured as in this




study its linear effect on children's blood lead is weak. However,




it seems plausible to assume from this analysis that the suggestion




that blood leads decrease as traffic count increase is a general




conclusion that can be expected to be found in other studies similar




to this one.  There may be underlying factors that are specific to




this study situation that are responsible for this coefficient
                               233

-------
having the wrong sign.
          Factor analysis is a multivariate technique used
to probe the variables for underlying factors of central
importance.  Principal component extraction of factors was
applied to the 25 independent variables.  Each factor explains
a portion of the variance in the correlation matrix of the
25 independent variables.  Normally, only the factors explain-
ing the highest portions are considered worthy of further
analysis.  However, our goal in using factor analysis is to
attempt to determine if the reason that the regression
coefficient of traffic count is negative is due to spurious
error sources.
          We do this in three steps.
          First, it should be noted that the regression
coefficient of traffic count and blood lead can be written
as a linear combination of the ith factor loading with the
jth variable (say a. .) and the regression coefficient (say
b^) of the ith factor on blood lead.  That is, the regression
coefficient, of traffic count on blood, lead (including as
independent variables  all 25 variables) is equal to
                              25
                                —x
                                 J   alj bi
                              1=1
So our first step is  to regress these 25 underlying factors
on blood lead to obtain the a..
          Nov. some  of  these terms are positive and some are
negative.   (If the  25  variables had all been unccrrelated then
                             234

-------
only one term would be nonzero).   Also some of these factors



primarily represent true underlying mechanisms of central



interest in this study.  That is, mechanisms that can be



expected to influence the data whether this study was conducted



in Dallas or San Francisco.  Other factors represent mechanisms



that are unique to this study.  We call these common factors



error factors.



            Secondly, we proceed on the assumption that factors



whose terms are positive in the above sum are the true factors.



If we add only these terms we can expect to obtain an adjusted



positive regression coefficient.   When the last assumption



is completely false this correlation should be 'too big'.



            Thirdly, we concentrate our analysis on the 'positive



factors'.  If we can identify these factors then we will obtain



assurance that the last assumption holds (at least for those



factors so identified).



            Instead of concentrating our efforts on identify-



ing the positive factors we could have considered the negative



factors.  However, we did not do this because it was thought



that identifying negative factors correctly would be a much




more difficult process.



            Lastly, even though this process may seem sub-



jective, it is not difficult to consider relationships between



variables that could pass undetected by this analysis.  For




example, the requirement of orthogonality which simplifies
                           235

-------
the analysis  usually makes  the factor identification process

more difficult.   Thus, we consider this method to be a quick

and dirty  look at the multivariate aspect of  this problem.

Considering only the first  six factors  (listed in Table  33)
       Table  33.  Correlations with the 25 independent variables
                  of the six principal component factors  that
                  contribute most to R2 (Data from children only)
Variable
No. I
1 .0298
2 .0679
3 -.1711
4 .0299
5 -.0662
6 -.0390
7 .1232
8 .0159
9 -.4392
10 -.2759
11 .1086
12 .0860
13 .1473
14 .5012
15 .0931
16 .2082
17 -.0232
18 .1108
19 -.1616
20 .4570
21 -.1308
22 .0256
23 -.1247
24 -.0320
25 -.2187
Percentage
Variation
Explained
6.62

II
.0523
.1399
-.1145
.2411
.2589
-.0074
.3555
.0719
-.0234
-.0417
.1950
.2750
.1077
.1676
-.2542
-.1358
-.1538
-.5144
-.0931
.0038
-.1226
. 3277
.0143
.1896
.1166


4.25

III
.1697
-.2458
-.1503
-.3407
.2344
-.0514
-.0887
-.2639
.0143
-.1592
.2367
-.0971
-.1783
.1563
-.0938
-.0428
.2868
-.0146
-.3619
-.3172
-.2442
-.1717
.1666
.2165
.0381


2.15

IV
-.1521
-.1452
.0722
-.1389
.1530
.2393
-.4509
-.1507
.0543
.0911
-.0425
-.0905
.4074
-.0722
.2140
-.2838
-.0499
.0730
.0299
.0968
-.2668
.4381
.0611
.1390
.0403


1.81

V
.2027
.2890
-.1461
.3904
.2629
.0166
-.3858
.0115
.0062
. 0043
-.3594
-.3278
-.3126
.0300
-.1516
-.2698
.1102
-.0199
-.0628
.0603
.0941
.0849
.0907
.0595
-.0659


1 . Id

VI
.0173
-.2559
.0676
-.2163
-.2441
.2591
-.0135
.0768
.0655
.1540
-.0767
-.2371
-.0070
.1970
-.4575
-.3860
-.2252
-.1547
-.0326
.1558
-.0786
-.2058
-.3335
-.0548
.0115


1 1 9
                           236

-------
that are most highly correlated with blood lead we find that
                              o                            P
these factors account for an Rc of 17-1 whereas before an R

of 21.7 was achieved using all the variables.  Thus, we see

that most (79% - 17-1/21.7) of the variation explained using

the 25 variables is explained using only these six factors.

Factors II, IV and V are the positive factors of the six

factors.  Combined they account for 1.8l + 4.25 + 1.14 =

7.20 of the R2 of 17.85? or 40$ of 17.8.

          Factor II is correlated with the age of the house,

hours away from home and handwipes.  The blood lead is

higher due to this factor when the chrld spends less time

away from home, lives in an older house and has higher

handwipe lead values.

          Factor IV is correlated with age of house, distance

from the road and handwipes.  The blood lead is higher on

this factor for a child who lives in a newer house farther

from the road and has higher handwipe lead levels.

          Factor V is correlated with screened for lead

absorption, age of house, and both indoor and outdoor paint.

The blood lead is higher on this factor for a child who

lives in a newer house which has low lead in the indoor and

outdoor paint.  Neither he nor members of the family in the

house have been screened for excess lead absorption.

          Factor II seems to be indicating that the subgroup

of this population of children that have the characteristics

that are correlated with factor II are in a slightly higher
                              237

-------
exposure category to automobile generated lead.  Factor  IV,



the most important of the three factors, indicates  that



distance from the road to the house is an additional




important variable.



             Factor V is difficult to interpret  as  reflecting




exposure from environmental lead.  For this reason  this  factor is



regarded as an error factor.



             In conclusion, there are 3 positive factors that



suggest that blood lead increases when traffic counts  increase.



Two of these factors suggest that more careful screening is



required to insure that the children live in houses



of a  similar age and a similar distance from the road  and spend



only  a short amount of time away from home.  However,  even with



such  increased control there is no suggestion that  a  dramatic



improvement in the R2 will result.  This analysis only consid-



ered  the effect on the relationship between blood lead and



traffic count caused by these 24 other variables.   The inclusion



of additional variables may improve the relationship.  For



example, traffic speed limits would be a good variable to



include.  More confident conclusions would require  a more



in depth analysis.




          For  adults,  28.6$  of  the  total  variation in



blood lead  was  explained  by  regression on the 25 environmental




variables.   Using  only  the first  six  factors we achieve



an R2 of 21.0,  which is  73%  (21.0/28.6)  of the variation
                            238

-------
Table 34.  Correlations with the 25 independent variables of the six
           principal component factors that contribute most to R2
           (data from adults only).
Variable
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Percent
Variation
Explained
I
.0076
-.1587
.0405
-.1033
-.1289
.0373
-.3030
.1211
.0130
-.1077
-.1555
-.1460
-.2944
-.4072
- .4481
- .4346
-.0497
.1556
.1444
.2538
.1145
-.0311
.0941
-.0574
-.0173
5.2%
II
-.1876
.2371
.0341
.0183
-.0574
.0953
-.0198
-.3481
-.2379
-.0376
.1315
.1346
.0310
.0229
-.0275
-.0033
.0781
.1343
.2720
-.0614
.5298
-.4834
-.1611
-.0761
-.1718
4.58%
III
.2276
.3788
-.2032
-.0045
.0929
.0118
-.0003
.0611
-.0054
-.0780
-.0277
.0824
-.0999
-.1661.
-.0759
.1277
.2114
-.0086
-.0228
-.0802
.4945
.5968
.0015
.1573
-.0207
4.30_%
IV
-.1453
-.2511
-.0311
.0008
.1412
.2382
-.1343
-.4398
.0837
-.1805
-.0301
.1775
.0730
-.4620
-.0653
.2806
.2726
.1147
-.0241
-.2089
-.2719
.0363
.0669
.1982
-.0474
2.32%
V
-.3840
-.1922
-.0081
.1148
.0913
-.2541
.0907
.1652
.0418
-.4358
.0684
-.0665
.0096
.1636
.0259
-.0817
-.0911
-.0597
.1971
-.2477
.1567
.0756
.4648
.2089
-.2387
2.30%
VI
.1015
.1172
.1075
-.0164
-.0412
.0449
-.0278
-.0560
.5955
-.0319
.0229
.1092
-.3751
.2371
-.0051
-.1403
.1488
.1277
.0214
-.3209
.0466
-.2037
.0454
.1525
.4011
2.29%
                                 239

-------
explained by using all 25 factors.  These six factors are



shown in Table 3^.  Only factors IV and VI which are the



positive factors will be interpreted.  Factor IV is cor-



related with sex and education of head of household.  Blood



lead is higher on this factor for adult males living in



households of lower educational levels.  Factor VI is cor-



related with indoor paint lead, distance from road, and



indoor dust lead.  Blood lead levels were higher on this



factor for those persons exposed to higher indoor dust lead,



indoor paint lead, and living closer to the roadway.  The



meaning of an association between paint lead and blood lead



in adults is not clear.  Perhaps these paint lead levels are



related to higher dust lead levels inside the home.



          In summary, for adults from 2% to 5% of the varia-



ation in blood lead can be explained by factors concerned



with sex, education, indoor dust lead, and distance from



road.  The exact nature of these relationships is not clear.



At this low level of correlation, the effect of a variable



on blood lead may be positive when combined with one variable



and negative when combined with another.  None of the relation-



ships shown here seem to have a strong effect on blood lead



or clarify the effect of traffic density on blood lead.



          Conclusions:  No strong relatjonships between



blood lead and environmental variables were seen in the
                              240

-------
regression analyses for children and for adults.  A smell



portion of the variation in blood lead was explained by



factors concerned with these who spent more tine awcy fron



home, sex, education levels, indoor dust lead, ard distance



from the road.  No effects of traffic density on blood leac



were clarified for adults or children.
                              241

-------
                    IV-   DISCUSSION








A.    Air Monitoring Study



      The principal objective of this air monitoring



effort was to examine the relationship of ambient air



lead levels with concurrent traffic count measurements.



Previous studies have demonstrated that there is a



general relationship between traffic counts and air



lead values obtained immediately adjacent to the road-



way.  This study was designed to calibrate the relationship



in the general vicinity of the epidemiologic study as well



as to investigate the importance of other parameters of



traffic exposures from combustion of leaded baseline.



Furthermore, these data may be useful in estimating the air



lead exposures of a number of urban residents in the United



States, since traffic count data are often available for



urban areas.  These data are relevant to the total problem



of air lead exposures from automobiles because, as stated



in the Introduction of this report, a very large proportion



of the total population of the United States resides on



streets with traffic densities ranging from less than 1,000



cars per day up to 25,000 cars per day, the traffic densities



covered in this study.




      The results of this study indicate that there was



a small but significant relationship between ambient air
                          242

-------
lead levels and traffic counts.  This relationship was



much stronger when the traffic densities reached  30,000



to 40,000 vehicles per day.  The ambient air  lead levels



ranged from 0.5 at less than 1,000 vehicles per day  to




1.9 yg/nr for the higher traffic- density levels.  This



study shows that a relationship exists between traffic



counts and air lead over this range but that  the  rela-



tionship is not a strong one and that other variables



such as the presence of obstructions near the site where



the air samplers were located, meteorological factors



and sampler variability may have obscured the primary



relationship.  During the study, placement of the high



volume air samplers was conducted very carefully  to



avoid the problems of interference from high  shrubs  and



buildings; however, thei'r influence could not be  com-



pletely avoided.  The samplers were always located at



a specified distance from the roadway and were always



located downwind from it relative to the wind direction




for that 24 hour period of monitoring.  Air data  collected



during the early stages of the project indicated  that



placement of a high volume air sampler near a residence



with a large shrub in between the sampler and the road-




way provided a much l..-we:/ level of lead than  for  corresponding




residences in which no shrub was present  In the pi 3rr.Hrv



study samplers vere placed t~ avoid thiy type cf  prctl-Ki
                           243

-------
The high volume air samplers were also located at approximately



3 feet above ground level which is near the breathing zone



for small children.  Most ambient air samplers operating in the



United States for regulatory purposes are located between



10 and 20 feet above ground level.  Data from this study



may not be directly comparable to data collected at other



sites with samplers located between 10 and 15 feet above



ground level due to the possibility that a vertical gradient




in air lead levels may be present.



       Outdoor  air  lead was  measured at  four  distances from



 the  street  to  determine whether  air lead  levels  decline



 in the  first  100 feet from  the roadway.   For all distances



measured, 5 to 100 feet from  the road,  air lead  concen-



 trations  declined  rapidly with distance  from the street.



At 50 feet, concentrations  were  about  55  percent of  the



 street  concentrations.  For air  lead  collections from



 5  to 100  feet  from the street, approximately 50  percent



of the  airborne  lead was in the  respirable range,  that is,



 less than 1 y  and  the proportions in  each size class



 remained  approximately the  same  as the  distance  from



the  street  increased.




       Two intersection studies were done  to  determine



whether residents  at intersections are  exposed to  higher



air  lead  levels than their  neighbors  at midblock locations



on the same street.  One study used only  intersections



with  small side streets  (less than 1,000  cars per  day).



The objective  of this study was  to determine additional



lead  exposure, if  any, of corner home residents  who
                          244

-------
were participants in the epidemiology portion of thds study




No additional lead exposure was measured for these parti-




cipants.  However, in the second study where larger inter-




sections were used, significantly higher lead levels were




found at intersections.  This occurred mainly at inter-




sections where primary streets had greater than 25,000




and secondary streets had at least 10,000 cars per day.




Further studies will have to be made to clarify this,




because of the small amount of data collected at the




higher traffic densities.




      Air lead levels were measured at two speed limits




(30 MPH and 45 MPH) on streets with approximately the




same traffic density to determine whether air lead levels




are influenced by vehicular speed   The air lead levels




at 30 MPH were twice those at 45 MPH, although a statis-




tical difference in the two samples could not be shown,




possibly due to large variation and small sample sizes.




      Most of the air lead samples in this study were




taken for a 24 hour period.  A study was made of air lead




measurements taken for shorter collection times: one, two,




four and twelve hours.  Shorter collection times over-




estimated traffic volume and introduced more variability




in air lead measurements.  The range in air lead measure-




ments increased with shorter sampling times at all traffic




densities.  No relationship between air lead levels and




length of collection times was seen.
                          245

-------
          Two of the ministudies conducted under the air-



sampling program dealt with the influence of indoor versus



outdoor exposures.  These studies were the simultaneous



hi-vol monitoring inside and outside of homes and the dustfall



study.  Although the use of hi-vol samplers in the indoor



environment may be somewhat questionable because cf the



possible "cleansing" effect of the high sampling rate the



results obtained in this study are not greatly different



from those obtained in studies which used lower sampling rates.



          In this study, indoor/ourdoor air lead samples were



taken at two traffic densities, nine samples at 10,000 cars



daily and seven at 20,000 cars daily.  The results showed



a highly significant difference in the levels cf lead indoors



versus outdoors at both the sites.  Thus at 10,000 cars per



day, the indoor air lead levels were 0.18 yg per cubic meter



while the mean value for the outside air was 0.92 yg per



cubic meter.  The levels cf lead in air indoors at the 20,000



cars per day was 0.20 yg per cubic meter.  Therefore, our



results indicate an approximate ten-fold reduction in air



lead levels from outdoor to indoor air.  These monitoring



studies were conducted during the summer months in Dallas,



Texas where the temperatures are usually in the 90's.



Questionnaire data indicated that virtually all the houses



in both the epidemiology study as well as the monitoring study



had air conditioning of seme type.



          Daines et al.  using a low volume sampler in




New Jersey  during the summer discovered a 65# reduction in





                           246

-------
air lead levels when air conditioners were used.
Benson et al. have summarized the indoor/outdoor  literature
as indicating particulate lead may be significantly reduced
by efficiently operating air conditioners with  filters
in place, but that operation of evaporative cooJers produce
an almost one to one ratio of air lead to indoor  lead.
          That there might be a problem with the  "cleansing"
effect may be seen from the following calculations.  The hi-
vol samp lei' was operated at a flow rate of approximately 50
cubic feet per minute usually in the living room  of the
selected residences.  Both indoor and outdoor monitoring were
performed over the same 12 hour period during the daytime.
A typical room in which the sampler was placed  would contain
350 cubic feet of air, and in this study the doors into the
other rooms we're left open, thus allowing free  movement of
air within the home.  Allowing for no infiltration of air
into the room there would be a complete passage of air through
the fLiter every 7 minutes or 100 times during  the monitoring
period.  If the living room was 1/4 of the cubic  footage of
the home there would be 25 passages v/jthjn the  monitoring
day.
      Outdoor dust samples were taken at ten locations and
each sample was paired with an indoor dust sample covering
the same time period  (28 days).  These comparisons of
indoor versus outdoor dust levels were made at  traffic
densities from less than 500 cars per day to more than
30,000 cars per day.  The mean for the ten outdoor samples
was 0.12 ug per square raster while the mean for  indoors

                             247

-------
was 0.012 yg per square meter.  These results are consistent

with the approximate ten-fold reduction of  lead outdoors

versus indoors in the air lead measurements.   This  ten-fold

relationship occurred at each traffic density.


      In a study conducted in Southern California there

were two study areas, one near a freeway in Los Angeles

with traffic densities of more than 200,000 cars per day

and the other in a city of 50,000  (Lancaster)  in a  high

desert area.  The mean air lead values were 6.3 yg/m3

for Los Angeles and 0.6 yg/m3 for Lancaster.   The range

of air lead means for this study were from  0.5 to 1.9

yg/m3.  The residences studied in Los Angeles  were  within

100 feet of the edge of the freeway and they did not have

air conditioning.  During the sampling effort  (September

1974), the windows of these residences were open much of

the time.  The majority of the residences in Lancaster

utilized evaporative coolers which provide  a large  ex-

change of outside air with inside air.  It  has been

concluded(33) that air lead levels present  indoors  in homes

with evaporative coolers are equal to levels present in

outside air.  The outside air lead measurements were

therefore good representations of air lead  exposure for

the Southern California studies.  As stated earlier,

this probably is not true for the  Dallas  study;  soil

lead levels in the Los Angeles study area ranged from

673 to 3633 yg/m3 and from 43 to 98 yg/m3   in  the

Lancaster area.   For this study the soil lead  values
                                       (34)
ranged from 4 to  730  yg/m3. Yankel et al.   reports an extensive


                         248

-------
study of the relationship of air and soil lead levels

to levels of lead in blood of children living in these

environments.  He stated that soil levels in excess of

1000 ug/m3  (30 day average) will result in excessive

percentages of children exceeding 40 pg lead/100 ml

blood.  These conditions were present for the Los

Angeles site for our southern California study but not

for this study.

      Topsoil  characteristics were determined for the

study area near participants' residences.  These

characteristics were determined on the same soil samples

in which soil lead measurements were made.  The objec-

tive of this effort was to examine the potential of the

type of soil with regards to lead adsorption, retention

and release of these top soils.  The majority of the soils

were high in clay content and in organic matter.  These

types of soils have a high potential for adsorption and

storage of lead.  The chemistry of the soil favors the

formation of relatively insoluble precipitates of lead.

The clay soils should retain lead deposited on and absorbed

by them; however, low permeability of the clay may reduce

initial infiltration during heavy rainfalls.

B.     Epidemiology Study of Traffic Density Relative to
      Levels of Lead in the Environment and Blood of
      Residents

      It has been suggested that the distribution of blood

lead levels for any relatively homogeneous population
                          249

-------
closely follows a log normal distribution   '   '   .In

the southern California study performed in this laboratory
(9,10,11)
        blood leads were log normal for the adult popula-


tion.  Results from this study show that the blood lead

values for adults and children had log normal distributions.


The measurement variance was considerably smaller for

this study than for the one in southern California and was

consistent with the variance in other lead studies.  This

was true for venous blood lead measurements but not for

the micromethods used on blood collected from the finger


prick method.  The micromethod of blood lead measurement

results in more variability than for the usual macro

method of analysis.  Also the procedure for collecting


capillary blood using the fingerprick technique is sub-

ject to more contamination effects at the time of collection

and analysis than the venipuncture procedure.

      Examination of the relationship of traffic counts to

levels of lead in the blood of participants revealed no

detectable relationship for traffic counts ranging from

less than 1,000 cars per day to more than 25,000 cars per

day.  No significant statistical relationship between-

traffic density and blood lead levels for any age group or

sex was found.  Blood lead levels were significantly higher


in children, ranging from 7  to 33 Mg per 100 ml, than in

adult-, which ranged frcn '< to ?1 yg per JOO ml.  No
                          250

-------
relationships were found between traffic counts and measure-




ments of FEP, hematocrits, carbon monoxide levels in blood,




and lead in hand-wipe samples.




     A positive relationship between smoking and blood lead




levels was found for both females and males in this study.




Females who smoke had significantly higher blood lead levels




than female exsmokers and nonsmokers.  Male smokers and




exsmokers had higher blood lead levels than nonsmokers,




although this difference was not significant.




     This study was designed to examine participants at



four basic traffic densities: less than 1,000; 8,000-14,000;




14,000-20,000; and 20,000-30,000 cars per day.  The epidemio-




logy study was designed such that there would be some




expected differences in exposure of these residents to levels




of lead in the air as a result of their living on streets of




these traffic densities.  The results of the air monitoring




study discussed above indicated that mean air lead levels




ranged from 0.5 yg per cubic meter to a high of 1.9 yg per




cubic meter.  This differential in levels of lead in the




air is quite small.  Previous studies examining the rela-




tionship of air lead with blood lead levels have been




successful for air lead at 2 yg and above.  If there are




significant differences in blood lead over the range in-




vestigated in this study, it is obvious that it could have




been seen only with much larger numbers of participants




than were included in this study.




                          251

-------
          Another factor which may have contributed to the



failure to demonstrate a relationship between blood lead and



traffic court in this study was the difference in exposure



between the indoor and outdoor environments.  Since this



study was performed during the hottest time of the year it



may be reasonabJe to suppose that participants may have spent



a significant proportion of the:"r day in the cool environment of



their hone produced by their air conditioners.  If the air lead



levels measured within the home are accurate then the observed



result would be entirely predictable.
                              252

-------
                                 V.  CONCLUSIONS





1.    Examination of the relationship of traffic  counts  from >1,000 to



     <25,000 cars per day with  the concentrations  of lead in the blood



     of residents on these streets revealed no  detectable relationship.



2.    No significant relationships were found between traffic counts and



     FEP,  hematocrits,  carbon monoxide levels in blood,  and lead in



     hand-wipes.



3.    There was  a small  but significant relationship  between levels of



     lead  in the air and traffic  densities.   Mean  air lead values  for



     each  street ranged from 0.5  to  1.9 yg/m^ from Site  1  to Site  4.



4.    There were significantly higher levels of  lead  in  soil near resi-



     dences in  Sites 3  and 4 than in Sites  1 and 2.   Soil  characteristics



     in the study site  areas favor retention of  lead.



5.    No significant relationships were found between traffic counts and



     the level  of lead  in indoor  dustfall  and window-sill  wipes.



6.    Comparison of lead levels  in air and  dustfall inside selected resi-



     dences with similar measurements taken outside  revealed tenfold



     higher levels of lead indoors.



7.    The lack of an association between traffic  counts  and blood lead



     levels can be understood in  terms of  the
                                   253

-------
       lead, exposures generated by the studied traffic volumes.



       The air lead levels observed at the maximum traffic-



       densities  (<2 yg/rr.-') have not been previously  shown  to



       result in  increased blood leads and neither have  the



       soil Jead  levels observed.  Furthermore,  the use  cf  air-




       conditioning may have contributed to  the  lack  of  an



       association by further reducing the effective  air lead




       exposure.




  8.    The levels of lead in the populations studied  are



       similar to values seen in other middle class sub-



       burban populations without occupational lead expo-



       sures and  not living near an expressway.



  9.    Higher levels of lead in blood were found in



       children than in adults and higher blood  leads were



       seen in adult males than in adult females.  In



       children,  females had slightly higher levels of



       lead in blood than did males.



 10.    Approximately 50% of the airborne lead was  in  the



       respirable range at distances from 5-100  feet  from



       the street.  The ratio of particle sizes  of lead



       did not change with distances from the street  (5-



       100 feet).  Air lead concentrations decline rapidly



       in the first 50 feet from the street.




11.    There were no increases in lead levels at intersections.



12.    Air lead levels in 30 MPH speed zones were approximately



       twice  air lead levels in 45 MPH zones; however, this



       difference  was not statistically significant.



13.    No significant relationship was found  between  lead



       levels  at peak traffic  hours and traffic  counts.





                                254

-------
14.     A significant association between blood lead and




       smoking was seen.  Female smokers had significantly




       higher blood lead levels than exsmokers and nonsmokers



       In males,  smokers and exsmokers had higher blood




       lead levels than nonsmokers,  although this difference




       was not significant.




15.     Lead contamination of blood samples is more critical




       with the capillary blood (finger-prick)  collection




       than with the venous  blood collection.




16.     The accuracy and precision of the capillary blood




       methodology is more variable than the venous blood




       methodology.
                             255

-------
                VI.  RECOMMENDATIONS








1.     To provide the data needed to accurately evaluate




      the effects of automotive emissions of lead on the




      population and the environment,  more studies of this




      type are needed.   This type of data is essential




      in making regulatory decisions regarding lead in




      gasoline.



2.     Efforts should be made to evaluate the levels of




      lead present  indoors in air and dust.   Indoor lead




      levels of residential homes, particularly those




      using air conditioning units appear to be much




      lower than in outdoor areas.  More information is




      needed regarding  how and where people  spend their




      time at home.   Factors such as the amount of time




      spent indoors vs  the amount spent outdoors need to




      be addressed.   Sampling should be done to better




      quantitate the indoor vs outdoor environments in




      various types of  residential areas.




3.     Evaluation of alternate dispersion mechanisms for




      lead emissions from automobiles should be done to




      better identify what happens to it in  the environ-



      ment .




4.     Analytical methods used to quantitate  the amount




      of lead in people and the environment  need to be




      standardized  so that improved comparisons and
                          256

-------
evaluations can be made -
                    257

-------
                             REFERENCES
 1.     Air Quality  Criteria for Lead, Environmental Protection
        Agency,  Draft  3, August, 1977.

 2.     Johnson,  D.E., J.B. Tillery, J.M. Hosenfeld and J.W. Register.
        "Development of Analytical Techniques to Measure Human Exposure
        to Fuel  Additives."  EPA Contract 68-02-0595, March 1974.

 3.     Galke, W.A., D.I. Hammer, J.L. Keil and W.W. Lawrence.   "Environ-
        mental Determinants of Lead Burdens in Children."  Proceedings of
        the International Conference on Heavy Metals in the Environment,
        October,  1975.

 4.     Caprio,  R.J.,  H.L. Margulis, and M.M. Joselo.  "Lead Absorbtion
        in Children  and Its Relationship to Urban Traffic Densities."
        Arch. Environ. Health 28:195, 1974.

 5.     Daines,  R.H. ,  D.W. Smith, A. Feliciano and J.R. Troup.   "Air
        Levels of Lead Inside and Outside of Homes."  Industrial Medi-
        cine & Surgery 41:26, 1972.

 6.     Thomas,  H.V. ,  B.K. Milmore, G.A. Herdbreder and B.A. Kogan.  "Blood
        Levels in Persons Living Near Freeways."  Arch. Environ. Health
        15:695,  1967.

 7.     Waldron, H.A.  "Lead Levels in Blood of Residents Near M6-A38 (M)
        interchange, Birmingham."     Nature 253:345, 1975.

 8.     Jones, R.D., B.T. Commins and A.A. Cernik. "Blood Lead and Cor-
        boxy Hemoglobin Levels in London Taxi Drivers."  Lancet  2:302, 1972.

 9.     Johnson,  D.E., J.B. Tillery and R.J. Prevost.  "Levels of Platinum,
        Palladium and  Lead in Populations of Southern California."
        Environmental  Health Prospectives 12:27, 1975.

10.     Tillery,  J.B.  and D.E. Johnson.  "Determination of Platinum,
        Palladium and  Lead in Biological Samples by Atomic Absorption
        Spectrophotometry."  Environmental Health Prospectives 12:27. 1975.

11.     Johnson,  D.E., R.J. Prevost, J.B. Tillery, D.E. Camann,  and
        J.M.  Hosenfeld.  "Determine Requirements for Obtaining Baseline
        Levels of Platinum and Palladium in Human Tissues."  EPA Contract
        68-02-1274,  1975.

12.    Snee, R.D.    "Evaluation of Studies  of the Relation-
       ship Between Blood Lead and Air Lead."   Technical
                               258

-------
      Report PLMR-8-77 Petroleum Laboratory, E. I.
      duPont deNemours and Company, April 7, 1977.

13.   Bridbord, K.C.  Commission of the European
      Communities Proceedings of the International
      Symposium on Environmental Health Aspects of Lead.
      Amsterdam, 1972.

14.   Bratzel,  Jr.,  M.P-  and A.J. Reed. Microsampling
      for bloodlead  analysis. Clin.  Chem.  20, 2, 217-221
      (1974) .

15.   Thompson, R.J.,  G.B. Morgan and L.J. Purdue. Analysis
      of selected elements in atmospheric particulate matter
      by atomic absorption.  Air Quality Instrumentation,
      Vol. 1,  Ed. J.W. Scales, Instrument Society of
      America Pittsburgh, Pa., 178-188 (1972).

16.   Smith,  Jr., R.G. and H.L.  Windom.  Analytical hand-
      book for the determination of arsenic, cadmium,
      cobalt,  copper,  iron, lead, manganese, mercury,
      nickel,  silver and zinc in the marine and estuarine
      environments.   Georgia Marine Science Center, Uni-
      versity Systems  of Georgia, Skidaway Island, Ga.,
      Technical Report Series No. 72-6, p 49-50 (1972).

17.   Hwang,  J.Y.,  P.A.  Ullucci, and C.J.  Mokeler. Direct
      flameless atomic absorption determination of lead
      in blood. Anal.  Chem. 45,  4,  795-798  (1973).

18.   Kubasik,  N.P.  and M.T. Volosin.   Use of the carbon
      rod atomizer for direct analysis of lead in blood.
      Clin.  Chem.  20,  2,  300-301, (1974).

19.   Delves,  H.T.   A micro-sampling method for the rapid
      determination  of lead in blood by atomic absorption
      spectrophotometry.   Analyst (London) 95,  431(1970).

20.   Olsen,  E.D. and P.L. Jatlow.   An improved delves
      cup atomic absorption procedure for determination
      of lead in blood and urine. Clin. Chem.,  18, 1312
      (1972) .

21.   Crisler,  J.P., N.T. Lao, L.C.  Tang,  B.A.  Serrano,
      and A.  Chields.   A microsampling method for the
      determination  of blood lead.   Miorcchem.  J., 18,
      77  (1973) .

22.   Cernik,  AA. and  M.H.P. Sayer.   Determination of lead
                          259

-------
      in capillary blood using a paper punched disc
      atomic absorption technique. Brit, J. Ind. Med.,
      18, 392(1971).

23.   Norral, E.  and  L.R.P. Butler.  The determination
      of lead in  blood by atomic absorption with the
      high temperature graphite tube.  Anal. Chim. Acta.}
      58, 47-56(1972).

24.   Piomelli, S. A  micromethod for free erythrocyte
      porphyrins: The FEP test. J. Lab. Clin. Med., 81,
      6, 932-940(1973).

25.   Piomelli, S., B. Davidow, V.F. Guinee, Young, P.,
      and G. Gay.  The FEP (Free Erythrocyte Porphyrins)
      test: a screening method for lead poisoning.
      Pediatrics, 51,  2, 244-259,  (1973).

26.   Collison, A., F. Rodhey, and D. O'Neal. Determina-
      tion of carbon  monoxide in blood by gas chromato-
      graphy. Clin. Chem., 14,  162-171(1968).

27.   Mickey, M.R., O.J. Dunn, and V. Clark. Note on the
      use of stepwise regression in detecting outliers.
      Computers and Biomedical Research. 7:105-111(1967).

28.   Dixon, W.J. Analysis of extreme values. Ann. Math.
      Stat. 21:488-506(1950).

29.   Sokal, R.R. and F.J. Rohlf. Biometry: the principles
      and practice of statistics in biological research.
      W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, p 776(1969).

30.   Dunn, O.J.  and  V.A. Clark.  Applied statistics:
      analysis of variance and regression. J. Wiley &
      Sons, New York,(1974).

31.   Bancroft, T.A.  Analysis and inference for incom-
      pletely specified models involving the use of pre-
      liminary test(s)  of significance. Biometrics, 20:
      427-442(1964).

32.   Johnson, D.E.,  J.B. Tillery, and R.J. Prevost.  Trace
      metals in occupationally and nonoccupationally
      exposed individuals. Env. Health Persp. 2tf:151
      (1975) .

33.   Benson, F.D., J.J. Henderson, and D.E. Caldwell.
      Indoor-outdoor  air pollution relationships. EPA
      Publication AP  112. August 1972.
                          260

-------
34.    Yankel, A.J.,  I.H. van Lindern, and S.D. Walter. "Tiie Silver Valley
      Lead Study.  "The relationship  of  childhood lead
      poisoning and Environmental Exposure."  Journal
      Air Pollution Control Association.  27:763(1977).

35.    Tepper, L.B. and L.S. Levin.  "A survey  of arid
      population lead levels in selected  American com-
      munities." EPA-Rl-005, U.S. Environmental Protec-
      tion Agency, Washington B.C.  1972.

36.    Azar, A., R.D. Snee  and K. Hapibi.  "An epidemic-
      logical approach to community  air lead  exposure
      using personal air samplers."  Environmental Quality
      and Safety,  Supplement Volume  2 - Lead  254-288,
      (1975).
                           261

-------
                   APPENDIX A
JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE OF STUDY  SITE TO DALLAS
                         262

-------
     JUSTIFICATION FOR CHANGE OF STUDY SITE TO DALLAS










       San Antonio, Texas, was selected at the outset of this study as the





study site after preliminary studies of traffic densities and general





population characteristics. Thoroughfares with adequate traffic densities





were identified for each of the five major categories of traffic density for





which the study is designed:  1) 1,000 or less cars per day,





2) 7,500-12,500 cars per day,  3) 12, 500-17 , 500 car s per day,





4) 17,500-22,500 cars per day,  and  5)  22,500 and more cars per  day.





Demographic information from census records were used to identify





expected population characteristics.   From the limited pre-analysis, it





was  concluded that San Antonio cauld meet the study requirement for





adequate number of participant populations residing on thoroughfares with





appropriate traffic densities.





       An in-depth site analysis was performed in San Antonio as the first





step in Contract 68-02-2227.   Table 1 presents a summary of the results of





that  site analysis.  The residences indicated in Table 1 are located on





thoroughfares or residential streets in areas of the city appropriate for





study due to economic and ethnic requirements: areas which are primarily





white and middle class.





       Residences which are  not at an intersection are desired for the study,





This restriction would eliminate all corner houses.  To meet the minimum





study requirement of 200 or more residences in each traffic density level,





corner houses would have to be considered in San Antonio for four  of the
                                  263

-------
Not on Corner
300
120
64
61
77
On Corner
--
159
156
122
35
Total
300
279
220
183
112
five traffic density classes,  as seen from Table 1.  For 1000 or less

cars/day, there are-more than adequate numbers.  The 300 shown are


                               Table 1.
      Summary of Site Analysis for Selected Areas of San Antonio


    Traffic Density         Number of Residences Within 100 ft. of Roadway
    1 or less

    7.5-12.5

    12.5-17.5

    17.5-22.5

    22.5 or more
 but a sampling of those available.  For all other traffic density levels,

 corner houses would have to be considered.    For the highest two levels,

 even consideration of. corner houses would not provide the  200  residences

 required.



        Review of the results of the in-depth site analysis has indicated that

San Antonio will not provide the study with the desired numbers of

residences for the purposes of recruitment of study participants.  Three

principal factors are seen as the cause of this.  First, much of the traffic

in San Antonio is carried by the freeway network, which is quite extensive,

rather than by non-freeway, mul+i-lane traffic arteries.  This  limits the

area of the city which can provide potential for study.  A major freeway

                                  264

-------
is presently under construction in the central northside area of the city.





Until it is completed, the existing multi-lane thoroughfares are  carrying





the  traffic load.  Sufficient traffic densities were found to exist in that





area of the city to much greater extent than any other area.  This,





coupled with economic and  ethnic restrictions regarding the candidate





populations,  provided the basis for  limiting the study to the central





northside area.  Second, much of the portions  of thoroughfares with the





highest two  levels of traffic density has been developed commercially





such that few residences are present in many of the best areas considering





the  traffic densities. Third,  large  numbers of the residences found on the





thoroughfares are corner houses which face the side street rather than





the  primary thoroughfare.  Use of these residences in the study is not





desired due to  possible error introduced by traffic from the side street.





       A preliminary siting study in Dallas, Texas,  has indicated that the





potential exists for finding  adequate numbers of residences appropriate





for  study in that city. The city has sufficient population to support a study





of this type,  with 1.5 million people reported in the metropolitan area in





the  1970 census.   The current estimate of population in the combined





Dallas/Fort  Worth metropolitan area is approximately Z.5 million persons.





Though highly industrialized and commercialized with light and sophisticated





industries such as electronics, aircraft,  and merchandizing,  little or no





heavy or polluting industry exists in the area.   Data  on air quality indicate





there are no point sources  of lead  (telephone  contact with Mr. Fred





Barnes,  Chief, Air  Pollution Control, City of  Dallas, Texas).




                                   265

-------
An abundance of heavily trafficked, multi-lane thoroughfares exist in all





parts of the city: some in excess of 30,000 cars per day.  The traffic




system in Dallas has historically been designed around such multi-lane





thoroughfares,  and a network of such arteries spreads across the city.





Figure 1 shows a map of the metropolitan area of Dallas, Texas.




       Results of preliminary counting of residences on a sampling of





thoroughfares in Dallas are presented in Table 2.  Only single family





residences which face the roadway were counted.  Thus,  corner houses





facing side streets  are not included in the count.  Corner houses facing





the primary  thoroughfare were not excluded from the count. It is




estimated that no more than 20% of the residences counted were  corner





houses and, thus,  80% or more would be appropriate for this  study.





The streets shown  are but a sampling of those available throughout the




city and were selected from areas estimated to have acceptable economic





and  ethnic  characteristics.  From Table 2,  it is apparent that the minimum





study requirement  of 200  or more residences in each traffic density class




should be easily obtained  in that city.





       Because working in Dallas, rather than San Antonio, will require




significant efforts away from the facilities of Southwest Research Institute,





there will be need for establishing a base  for activities in that  city.





Preliminary contacts have been made with personnel of the Center for





Urban and Environmental Studies at Southern Methodist  University.





Preliminary arrangements have been made to devote a graduate student





part-time to  this project to serve as  on-site coordinator  for study activities







                                  266

-------
in Dallas.  Through the office of the graduate student, the University





will provide office space and telephone facilities for utilization by the





study team while on location in Dallas.





       Contacts have also been made with the air pollution control





group of the City of Dallas,  and they are very interested in assisting in





the study proposed for their city.   The traffic department  of Dallas has





also indicated that they will assist in the study.
                                   267

-------
             TABLE 2.  SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES:  DALLAS
                         Number of Residences Within 100 Feet of Roadway
                                   Which Face the Roadway
Street
Mockingbird Lane

Jupiter Road

Garland Road

Forest Lane

Marsh Avenue

Lemon Avenue

Inwood Road

Gaston Avenue

Illinois Avenue

Buckner Blvd.

East Grand Avenue

Hampton Road


TOTAL
 12.5-17.5
Thous. cars/day

      184
      60
     120



      16

      23

      50
  17.5-22.5
thous.  cars/day

     127

       29
       10

       27

       78



       32

       69
   22.5 -
thous. cars/day

     68
                                             10
                                             29
                                             32
    146
     453
                                                372
                                           285
80% of Total
     362
                                               297
                                           228
                                      268

-------
              Figure 1.
Expressways and Major Thoroughfares
            Dallas,  Texas

-------
                        APPENDIX B
LETTERS OF PERMISSION  TO PROCEED FROM LOCAL  GOVERNMENTS
                             270

-------
                    CITY OF DALU\S


March 17, 1976
R. John Prevost
Senior Research Analyst
Department of Social Sciences
Southwest Research Institute
Post Office Drawer 28510
San Antonio, Texas  78284

Dear Mr. Prevost:

In response to your letter of March 4, we  certainly
have no objection to your conducting the proposed
study of blood lead levels in people exposed  to
particularly high levels of air pollution  by  auto-
mobiles in Dallas.  We would appreciate receiving
a copy of whatever information you develop.

Sincerely,
          Berry, MVDV,-^M .f . H.
Director of Public Healtl(

ELB:tg
                           271
    DEPART MCNT OF PUt'UC HEALTH

-------
                       CITY OF DALLAS
March 10, 1976
Mr. R. John Prevost
Senior Research Analyst
Department of Social  Sciences
Southwest Research Institute
Post Office Drawer 28510
San Antonio, Texas   78284

Dear Mr. Prevost:

This is to acknowledge our  telephone conversation this
date dealing with your plan to  conduct a public health
survey in Dallas under contract with the U. S. Environmental
Protection Agency.

I do appreciate your  informing  me that you will have
representatives conducting  a  door-to-door survey using
an EPA questionnaire.  Since  your proposed survey as
described will involve neither  charitable solicitation
nor home solicitation as defined in existing City ordinances,
no permit of any type from  this department will be required.

Please contact me if  you need further information.
Sincerely,
Charles H. Vincent, Director
Department of Consumer Affairs

CHV/jec
                             272
        DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS  OlYHALL P'L1. *S TEXAS 7SZOI rELEPHOIvf 214 • 740-9711

-------
                       CITY OF DALLAS
      March 10,  1976
      Mr. R. John Prevost
      Senior Research Analyst
      Department of Social Sciences
      Southwest Research Institute
      8500 Culebra Road
      P. 0. Drawer 28510
      San Antonio, Texas  78284

      Dear Mr. Prevost:

      We thank you for sending us your plans March 3
      on lead surveys in Dallas.  Our department has
      no objections to these plans.

      Please let us know if we can be of assistance,
      and keep us informed of the results of this
      survey -
      Very truly yours,
             ^           _
      George"1\7. Ilintgen, P.E.
      Environmental Research Coordinator
      Environmental Health and Conservation
      GWH : wg
                             273
ENVIHONMtNT AL HfALTH AND CONSERVATION •

-------
   MAYOR
 Ashley H. Priddy
MAYOR PRO TEM
 Richard L. Jones
  COUNCILMEN
George Rather Jones
  Robert F. See
Ralph W. Smith. Jr.
  W. L. Todd, Jr.

    JUDGE
 Pat A. Robertson
THE  TOWN OF
                              4700 DREXEL DRIVE, DALLAS 75205
                                    Telephone  521-4161


                                    March 23, 1976
                                                         SECRETARY AND
                                                           TREASURER
                                                            Jerry T.Btll

                                                         TOWN ATTORNEY
                                                         H. Lou Morrison, ],

                                                         CHIEF OF POLICE
                                                            AND FIRE
                                                           r. H. Gardntt
        Mr. R. John Prevost
        Southwest Research Institute
        8500 Culebra Road
        P. O. Drawer 28510
        San Antonio, Texas 78284


        Dear Mr. Prevost:

        This will acknowledge your letter of March 19 in which you indicate
        the selection of Mockingbird Lane in Highland Park for a portion of
        your surveys.

        The Town attempts to control the activities of solicitors of all types
        through the Police Department.  For this reason, and because  of the
        possibility of traffic surveys, you are  asked to  contact the Police
        Department prior to beginning any activity of the type described.
                                                   Sincerely yours.
        JDHrmrn
        CC:  Chief W. H. Gardner
                                 I. D.  Hancock, Jr. ,
                                 Town Administrator
                                            274

-------
               ,^-r -T^^F^^TT-"'-   7
               !  :':• !,-: La./.!..;'.'-• ••* k- .
n. 'f.'-i" ;  :-:v '.    " '-•< ! "-=••-" • -•  "   -^
w>.-'^' V"l*:''-'-:''':'"': N i:NL-i'-      -     •;-£*
                                ssoo
E. WILSON GERMANY
   Usyor
 FRED N PEEK

PETER S. CHANTILIS

IELAND D. NELSON
Cilv Manager - tier*
                                           .O. a OX SOO5
                                             75205
                                          March 9,  1976
Mr.  R. John Prevost
Senior Research Analyst,  Department of Social Sciences
Southwest Research Institute
8500 Culebra Road
P. O.  Drawer 28510
San Antonio,  Texas  78284

Dear Mr.  Prevost:

I have  your letter of March 4, 1976,  in which you indicate that you are
going to conduct a study in the Dallas metropolitan area under an EPA
contract.  More definitely, you are going to study and examine the re-
lationship between traffic density and lead in the air and blood of exposed
populations.  Included in that sample study will be a portion of Univer-
sity  Park.

In response to your  request to use a portion of the City of University
Park for your study, I would  say that we would  have no objection what-
soever.  In fact,  if we can help y^u in any way in your study, please let
us know.   We would be  interested in the results of your study.
                                          Sincerely yours,
                                          Leland Nelson
                                          City Manager
LN:dh
cc: Mr. Jim Murphy, City Engineer
    Mr. J. D.  Brown,  Chief of Police
                                     275

-------
                                                                       L/Ou RAINCi
                                                                         MAY HP

                                                                       IOMKhELE

                                                                     MAW "PO TEM

                                                                     ROM P i HPAND

                                                                      Dt I Of-1 A LE#l->
                                                                    CHAPLK:G.CLACK
                                                                     r.iM NICHOLSON
                                                                     Uw.VfilC GFNTSCH
                                                                     VLPti'Jti £ . EMORY
                                                                   JOHNIE I' I.UfjHALL

              Post Office  Box  189 / Garland,  Texas  75040            CHAS.E.D;CKWOPTH

                                                                      CIT'r MANAU P
City  of   Garland
March  30,  1976
Mr.  R,  John Prevost
Senior  Research Analyst
Southwest  Research Institute
P. 0. Drawer 28510
San Antonio, Texas 78284

Dear Mr. Prevost:

The purpose of this letter  is  to confirm the  results of our
visit Monday, March 29.  The Southwest Research  Institute is
authorized to conduct the study to examine  the relationship
between traffic densities and  lead in the ambiant air and
blood in the exposed populations on Walnut  Street in Garland.
As we discussed, you agreed to supply the City of Garland with
the names  of all project researchers assigned to Garland, the
locations  to which they will be assigned, and the location of
traffic densities and air quality measuring devices.  This in-
formation  should be supplied to Mr. Bill Cox, City Sanitarian.

Should  further information be  required, please advise.

Sincerely,
Donald  E.  Paschal, Jr,
Community  Services Administrator

DEP/hc

cc:   Linda Johnson
                              276

-------
                                    THE   CITY  OF
                                          RICHARDSON
                                          RICHARDSON.  TEXAS
                                                             May 2.6,  1976
                 "'TH A
'"< COUNCIL

iiYMONO D. NOAH
  (Mayor)
"M J. EWBANK
 !Voyor Pro Tern)
--OMAS G. HARDY, JR.
-3WARD D. HERN
= ETER L. ROLLOSSON
.:SEPH E. DUGGAN, JR.
VARTHA E. RITTER
= :S HUGHEY
1 ~i Manager
Mr. R. John  Prevost
Senior Research Analyst
Department of Social Sciences
Southwest Research Institute
Post Office  Drawer 28510
San Antonio,  Texas  7828^
                             Subject:    EPA  Contract 68-02-2227
                    Dear Mr. Prevost:
                    This letter is to advise  that Richardson will participate  in the
                    above cited EPA study  at  the following locations.

                         1.   Belt Line Road from Central Expressway west to  Coit Road.

                         2.   Coit Road from Spring Valley Road north to Arapaho Road.

                    If further locations are  considered in your survey, please advise
                    this office prior to commencement of survey work.

                    Yours very truly,
                    Bob Hughey

                    BH:br

                    cc:   Mr.  Ted C. Willis
                         Assistant City Manager

                    cc:   Mr.  Kenneth R. Yarbrough
                         Chief of Police
                                                  277
   'THE ELECTRONICS CITY OF THE WORLD"   A  CITY OF FINE CHURCHES, SCHOOLS, HOMES AND  INDUSTRY
             P  0. BOX 309      RICHARDSON, TEXAS  75080      AREA CODE 214  235-8331

-------
                                THE   CITY  OF
                                        RICHARDSON
                                        RICHARDSON, TEXAS
                                                         May 27,  1976
 •UNCIL

 ID D. NOAH
 tor)
 EWBANK
 ' Pro Tern)
  G. HARDY, JR.
 5 D. HERN
 L. ROLLOSSON
 E. DUGGAN, JR.
 k E. RITTER
 IGHEY
 lager
Mr. R. John Prevost
Senior Research Analyst
Department of Social  Sciences
Southwest Research Institute
Post Office Drawer  28510
                            Subject:    EPA Contract 68-02-2227
                 Dear Mr. Prevost:
                 This letter  is  confirming our telephone conversation today whereby
                 Mr. Hughey is granting permission to extend the boundaries of your
                 EPA study from  Coit Road at Spring Valley Road north to Campbell
                 Road to include the nine residences between Arapaho Road and
                 Melrose Drive.
                 Yours very  truly,
                 (Mrs.) Barbara A.  Rusch
                 Secretary to Mr. Hughey
                 /BR
                 cc:
     Mr. Ted C. Willis
     Assistant City Manager
                                              278
•THE ELECTRONICSCITY OF THE WORLD"   A CITY OF FINE CHURCHES, SCHOOLS, HOMES AND  INDUSTRY
          P 0. BOX  309      RICHARDSON, TEXAS  75030      AREA CODE 214  235-8331

-------
                                                                             pn,i' n on r'.n't
                                                                             \ii\k iJ i uAlitit
                                                                          ALL AMERICA  CITY
                                                                            i 1
np
! !/
         March 22,  19?6
         R.  John Prevost
         Dept.  of Social Sciences
         Southwest Research Institute
         P.  0.  Box 28^10
         San Antonio,  TX  7325k

         Dear Mr.  Prevost:

         I have been asked tc  answer your letter dated March YJ.  1976.  We
         will be happy to cooperate in a_.y way possible in your public health
         survey.   Please feel  free to call on me.

         Yours  truly,


        .  ''# . —  (     '''<'/..','(
        ''Burl Cockrell,  F:.  S.
         Director  of Environmental Health

         BC ''j'ni

         cc:   Kenneth Burr,  Chief of Police
                                            279
CITY OF GRAND PRAIRIE, P.O. BOX 11, GRAND PRAIRIE, TEXAS 7f,050 TEL. (AC 214) 2G3-5221

-------
                                                                   v i -  i *•.-
   Oty of /irhng tonTexas
               Box 231
               Zip Code 76010
               Arlington Phone
               (817)275-3271
               Dallas Phone
               (214)262-4660
          Mr. R. John  Prevost
          Senior Research  Analyst
          Department of  Social  Sciences
          Southwest Research Institute
          P.O.  Drawer  28510
          San Antonio, TX   78284

          Dear  Mr. Prevost:

          In regard to your correspondence of March  17,  1976,  the City of
          Arlington has  no objections to the lead study  work to be conducted
          in the City  by the Southwest Research Institute.

          In this  connection, please inform me of the proposed locations for
          automatic traffic counting, and particulate air  sampling devices within
          the City at  least one week prior to their  planned  installation.  City
          Public Safety, and Traffic and Transportation  personnel will review  the
          locations to determine their adequacy from a safety  standpoint.  You
          will  be  notified only if the locations proposed  are  not satisfactory.

          Enclosed for your information is correspondence  sent to your Project
          Coordinator  at SMU.

          Sincerely,
          Ross B. Calhoun
          City Manager

          cc:  Linda Johnson,  Project Coordinator
               SMU
          enclosure
                                          280
Tori J V.v-V'j-ift M.!u». Council S J Slo\ ill M ivor Pn>T, • n Df '"i G Aii'\,i"Jt". CiroV' W SnuVr H iroM P.irh'r'.m K i ill Snollon M. n

-------
  Giy of A-lrngtonTexas
               Box 231
               Zip Code 7G010
               Arlington Pnonu
               (817)275-32/1
               Dallas Phone
               (214)262-4660
March 29,  1976
          TO WHOM  IT  MAY CONCERN:
          This letter  is  to certify that  the Southwest Research Institute
          has the  permission of the City  of Arlington to conduct a house-
          to-house public health survey.

          This survey  is  part of a study  by the Institute  to  examine re-
          lationships  between traffic densities, and lead  in  the ambient
          air and  lead in the blood of  exposed populations.

          The study is being conducted  by the Institute for the U.S.
          Environmental  Protection Agency.

          Thank you for cooperating with  the survey team.  —

          Sincerely,
          Ross B.  Calhoun
          City Manager


          /ss
                                          281
lomj Vanctajriff, Mjyor. Carnal S J Stovjil. M:-i/0'Pro-Tom. Dr R G Alexander. C.vo'yn W Snider H iroM P iMuison Rjiph Sh.'iion Mirth,, V\i'ker

-------
                     APPENDIX C




JUSTIFICATION  FOR HOUSEHOLD HEALTH SURVEY FOR LEAD
                           282

-------
  JUSTIFICATION OF HOUSEHOLD HEALTH SURVEY FOR LEAD
A.      Supporting Statement Justification





        1.    This new questionnaire is required to obtain information on





a population on human volunteers living in a major metropolitan area





(San Antonio, Texas).  The primary objective of this program is.to





determine body burden levels of lead in populations of a major metropolitan





area without occupational exposure to lead.  The amount of lead found in





blood of the human participants, lead in soil,  lead in house dust, lead





in hand wipes, lead in tap water, and lead in ambient air will be correlated





with traffic densities.   No suitable questionnaire forms of this type are





currently available within the Environmental Protection Agency or known





from other agencies which meet the design requirements of this  study.





This questionnaire is  to be utilized on EPA contract number 68-02-22.2,1





entitled  "Epidemiologic Study of the Effect of Exposure to Automobile





Traffic on the Blood Levels  of Persons in Selected Age Groups".  A copy





of the Work Plan for this program is attached.





       It has been shown that the levels  of lead in body burdens of





populations are related to factors such as age, sex, race, cigarette





smoking, and use of certain types of lead-containing articles to prepare





or serve food.   This questionnaire form would provide the necessary





information to assist in the final statistical evaluation of collected data





that would  guide the EPA in its  assessment of potential health effects





associated with body burdens of lead.  This questionnaire will solicit






                                283

-------
personal information from  some 1Z50 individuals living within the study




area with regard to age,  sex,  smoking habits,  and occupation. From




a maximum of 1250 subjects completing the questionnaire,  440 will be




selected to provide the study with the following three age groups:




preschool, 1-6 years; adult, 20-59 years; retired, 60 years and  over.




Each of these individuals would then be sampled twice for blood.  These




samples would be analyzed for concentrations of lead.  The mean




concentrations of each of the three age groups will be calculated along




with standard deviations and confidence limits for the means.   These data




will then be correlated with traffic density levels to determine the




relationship.  Additional statistical correlations will be made  to determine




the possible relationship between concentrations of lead and the covariate




information collected on the questionnaire.




        This project will be conducted as  a contract with SwRI  under




the technical direction of Dr. Donald E. Johnson.   The attached Work




Plan from Southwest Research Institute provides more details on the




plans for this survey.







        2.    The data collected using this survey instrument and the




follow-up statistical analysis will be utilized by the Environmental




Protection Agency to assess the potential  health effects associated with




body burdens  of lead as  related to automobile traffic.
                               284

-------
        3.    There are some preliminary data in the literature which





indicate that certain parameters such as age, sex,  ethnic origin,





smoking history,  etc. , are associated with the body burdens of lead.





This in-depth survey of human subjects and comparisons to traffic density





will provide more definitive information about these relationships.







B .      Description  of Survey Plan






        1.    The survey design will be aimed at determining the body





burdens of lead of populations living within 100 feet of streets carrying





traffic densities which vary from less than 1000 cars per day to greater





than 25, 000 cars  per  day.  It is  estimated that the total population living





within 100 feet of such streets within the United States is significantly




over one million.







        2.    The  survey is designed to initially contact and survey





1,000 households, ZOO at streets carrying each of the following approximate





traffic densities:  less than 1000 cars per day,  10, 000 cars per day,





15, 000  cars per day,  20, 000 cars per day, and 25, 000 or  more cars per





day.  Each household will be contacted by a personal interviewer.  A set





of general information will  be obtained from the person interviewed. If





appropriate age and occupational status are determined,  the person will





be asked questions 12  and 13 of the Household Health Survey for Lead:





"Would you participate in a health  survey as a paid volunteer ?  Other





members of household?" It is anticipated that approximately 440 subjects





who respond to this  questionnaire will be chosen, on the  basis of age,




                                285

-------
occupation, and location categories,  to participate as paid volunteers.




Each subject will be sent a letter announcing that he or she has been




selected for the survey; a time and place will be specified as to when a




team will visit the subject's  house  to accomplish the blood and soil





samples.




       A pre-test of the questionnaire has been conducted.  This




pre-test was conducted with  five representative individuals from the staff




of Southwest Research Institute, and no  difficulties were encountered.




The question of non-responders for this particular  survey does not




appear to represent a problem, since the burden for the individuals at




households to respond to this is minimal and number of non-responders




is expected to be very low.







       3.    The statistical  design of the project will come primarily




from Mr.  David Camann with Southwest Research Institute.  The




Environmental Protection Agency's statistician,
                            ,  has reviewed this protocol.
       4.    Name of the Contractor:  Southwest Research Institute.




Contractor's role:  the primary role is to collect information and provide





a final report to include statistical evaluation of data and conclusions





regarding the body burdens of lead found and the correlation to traffic




density.





       Southwest Research Institute guarantees confidentiality of





the collected data to the subjects surveyed.   No direct reference to the




                                286

-------
 collected data using the subject's name or address will be made.  The




 compilation of subject's name and address will be maintained in a




 confidential file and will not be directly related to any of the collected




 data.  Each subject surveyed will be assigned a code number,  and the




 coded number with the individual's name will be maintained only in the




 files of Dr. Donald E. Johnson, principal investigator, at Southwest




 Research Institute.







 C.     Time Schedule for Data Collection and Publication




        The contract term is for twelve months with an additional 60 days




 for review of the draft final report.  The final report should be completed




 September, 1976.  Monthly progress reports will also be submitted.  It




 is estimated that the elapsed time between the completion of data collection




 and the issuance of the  first published report will be six months .







 D.     Consultations Outside the Agency




        Southwest Research Institute has consulted with the City of San




 Antonio for assistance and coordination in the conduct of the survey.







 E.     Estimation of Respondent Reporting Burden




        The estimation of respondent reporting burden for the Household




 Health Survey is ten minutes, with a maximum of 20 minutes.  This





estimate is based on a preliminary pre-test  survey of randomly selected




Southwest Research Institute employees and should be the amount of time




necessary for even a large household to complete.





                                287

-------
F.     Sensitive Questions




       Questions 7 and 8 of the General Information Questions ask




questions regarding diagnosed incidence of lead poisoning and




approximate age of the home.  This information is essential in order




to provide an assessment of the background of lead poisoning and potential




for lead poisoning due to pica.  Questions 10 and 11 of the General




Information and 5,  6,  and 7 of the Individual Information Questions provide




data regarding the occupation of the individual.  These questions are




essential to establish that the individual is not occupationally exposed to




lead and that he generally spends his day in the vicinity of his home.




Questions 8 and 9 of the Individual Information  establish the individual's




smoking history.  This is essential because this study is concerned with




air-borne pollutants,  and cigarette smoking affects the absorption rate




of such chemicals.   Other questions refer to some of the socio-economic




background necessary to make valid statistical  comparisons with other




areas.
                                288

-------
                                   QUESTIONNAIRE 4Z94-1
                         HOUSEHOLD HEALTH SURVEY FOR LEAD
      Name
               Last Name, First Name  M. I.
     Address:      Street_
                       City_
                  Zip Code
                 Telephone
      General Information Questions
 1.   How many persons reside in your household?
 2.  For each person in your household, including yourself,  please indicate the age and sex,
     beginning with the oldest and proceeding to the youngest:

     Age 	  	  	  	  	  	  	  	
     Sex
 3.  Households with minor children present:
     Do both parents reside in household? 	
 4.   What educational level has been completed by the head of your household?

                1  - Less than 8th grade                 5  -  College - Incomplete
                2  - 8th grade                           6  -  College - Complete
                3  - High School - Incomplete            7  -  Graduate School
                4  - High School Completed

 5.   Do you cool your home with any of the following appliances?

                1  - Central air conditioning             4  -  Window fan
                2  - Window air conditioner              5  -  Ceiling exhaust fan
                3  - Evaporative cooler                  6    Other	
 6.  Are any of the following articles used in preparing or serving meals in your household:

     1 -  Unglazed pottery made in Mexico              3 - Hand painted flatware
     2 -  Glazed pottery made in Mexico                4 - None of these

 7.  "Has any member of  your household been diagnosed for lead poisoning? 	
     If so, which member or members? 	

 8.  What is the approximate age of your home? 	years

 9.  .Are you ever  aware of a smell o.r odor from automobile traffic?
     Inside house 	
     Outside house
10.  Do any members of your household have occupations which normally take them away from
     home during their work hours? 	
     If so, which members?	

11.  Do any members of your household have occupations which normally do not take them a\vcv
     irom home? 	
     li so, which members?
12.   Would you participate in a health survey as a paid volunteer ? (P^iid $15 for  blood, dust,
     and soil samples) 	

13.   Other members of household? 	


                                             289

-------
    Individual Information Questions

1.   Date of Birth	Month	Day	Year

2.   Sex:       1  -  Male       2  -  Female

3.   What is your marital status?
              1    Single             4  - Divorced
              2  -  Married            5   - • Widowed
              3  -  Separated          6   -  Other

4.   How many years have you lived in San Antonio? 	years
    At your present address?                     	years

5.   What is your usual occupation?  (Please specify)  	
    Are you presently occupied in this manner? 	
6.  Does your occupation usually take you away from home?
7.  Which of these best describes your present occupational status?

              1  -  Employed fulltime (including self employed)outside home
              2.    Employed part-time outside home
              3  -  Employed inside home
              4    Unemployed
              5    Housewife
              6  -  Student
              7    Play/Nursery School
              8  -  Pre-school
              9  -  Retired

8.  Have you ever  smoked as many as five packs of cigarettes, that is, as many as  100
    cigarettes during your entire life? 	
    Do you now smoke cigarettes? 	

9.  If you are a current or an ex-cigarette smoker:

    a.   How many cigarettes do (did) you smoke per day

         l--Less than 1/2 pack per.day (1-5  cigarettes per day)
         2--About 1/2 pack per day (6-14 cigarettes per day)
         3--About 1 pack per day (15-25 cigarettes per day)
         4--About 1-1/2 packs per day (26-34) cigarettes per day)
         5--About 2 packs per day (35 or more cigarettes per day)

    b.   How old were you when you first started smoking? 	Years

    c.   How old were you when you last gave up smoking, if you no longer smoke?        Yeai


              YOU HAVE COMPLETED THE QUESTIONNAIRE-THANK YOU

    Intei-vjewer Note and Record

    1.  Site Number
    2-  Distance  to center of primary roadway
    3.  Distance  to other nearest roadway     ^~~~
    4.  IMNOWO   123456
                                            290
    8/7/75

-------
 iTANDARD FORM NO. 83
 JFFICE Of MANAGEMENT
  .NO BUDGET
                     CLEARANCE REQUEST AMD  NOTICE OF ACTION

        (Under Federal Reports Act and Bureau of the Budget Circular No. A-40, as amended)
                                                                                             FOR O.M.B. USE
  MPORTANT — Submit the required number of copies of SF-83, together
                with the material for which approval is requested to:

    READ INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE COMPLETING FORM
                                                              CLEARANCE  OFFICER
                                                              OFFICE  OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
                                                              WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503
                    ^           PART A - REQUEST BY FEDERAL AGENCY FOR CLEARANCE
                     Items marked with asterisk may be omitted for preliminary plans or recordkeeping requirements
  , SEND "NOTICE OF ACTION" TO:  Name and mailing address
                                                                      2. Bureau and division or office originating
                                                                         request
                                                                                     3. Name(s), title(s), and telephone numbers of
                                                                                       person(s) who can best answer questions
                                                                                       regarding request.
IFORM OR
 DOCUMENT
 IDENTIFI-
 CATION
  4. Title of form or document submitted

    HOUSEHOLD HEALTH SURVEY FOR  LEAD
                                          "5. Agency Form Number(s)
                 6. Type of form or document

                   i Q Application

                   2 fj] Program evaluation

                   3 Q Other management
                        report
                   4[^Statistical survey
                        or report
                            51  |  Preliminary plan
                                 or contract

                            6 O  Recordkeeping
                                 requirement

                            7 Q  Other - Specify-
                                                      7. Current (or former) O.M.B. clearance
                                                        Number
                            Expiration date
                                                      8. Requested expiration date

                                                        June  1976
                            9. Type of request
                              i [Xj New

                              z[  | Revision

                              3 I  I Extension
                                   (No change)

                              4I  | Reinstatement
               *10. Frequency of use
                   i Q Single time  s D Quarterly
                   2 (Xj On occasion 6 O Semi-annually
                   3 Q Weekly      7 O Annually
                   4 D Monthly     e D Other <** i
                                               11. Related forms or documents (Give O.M.B. number.  Enclose in
                                                  parentheses any to be replaced.)
                                               12. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program number (if applicable)
COLLECTION
AND
RESPONDENTS
*13a. Collection method
     ( Check as many as apply)
                      ]  Personal interview

                        Other - Describe
               *13b. Collected by -

                   4 Q Agency

                   y[XI Contractor
                   6 I   I Other - Describe -
14a. Type of respondents involved
    (Check predominant one)

    i [X] individuals or households

    2 |   | Business firms (non-farm)

    3 Q Farms

    4 Q Government agencies

    5 Q Other - Describe —,
*15. Summary of estimated
    respondent burden
  a. Estimated number of
    respondents
                            14b. Brief description of respondents
                                (i.e., "households in 50 largest
                                SMSA's; "retail grocery stores")
                                                                b. If sample, approximate
                                                                  number in universe
                                                                              c. Reports filed annually by
                                                                                each respondent (item 10)
                                                                d.Total annual responses (a X c)
                                    e. Estimated average number of
                                      man-hours required per response
                                                                              f. Estimated TOTAL MAN-HOURS
                                                                                of respondent burden (d X e)
                                                                                                                 Number
                                                                                                 1250
                                   over
                                one million
                                                                                                 onee
                                                                                                 1250
                                    1/3
                                                                                                 416
AUTHORITY
AND CONFI-
DENTIALITY
*16a.ls report form -
    i Q Voluntary?

    2 S3 Required to obtain benefit?
              Mandatory? Cite statute
                *16b. Does your agency pledge
                     confidentiality?

                     i [^ Yes       2QNo
CONSULTA-
TIONS OUT-
SIDE AGENCY
 17.  In developing the report form or other documents, were
     consultations held with individuals or organizations
     outside your  agency?
                                 Yes - If "yes," identify persons and describe outcome in
                                       SUPPORTING STATEMENT. (See instructions)
                                 NO
 CERTIFICATION BY AUTHORIZED OFFICIALS SUBMITTING REQUEST - We certify that the form or other document submitted (or approval is
 necessary for the proper performance of this agency's functions, that the information requested is not available from any other source, to the best
 of our knowledge, and that the request is consistent with applicable O.M.B. and agency policy directives.  Signature and title of:
Approving official for agency
                                   Date
                     Agency clearance officer or other agency official
                                                                                                                 Date

-------
                           APPENDIX  D

       AppendixD contains  the air lead  concentrations and corres

ponding traffic counts.  The abbreviated variables  and their units

are explained below.
       Traffic Class    Estimated traffic class
       Street           Name of street
       Date             Date on which 24-hour count was started
       Traffic Count    Actual traffic count
       Air Pb          Air lead concentration ((a/m^
                                292

-------
APPENDIX  D
Traffic
Class
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
0J000
01000
0J000
01000
.01000
01000
,01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
01000
.01000
01000
01000
01000
05000
05000
05000
05000
05000
05000
05000
05000
05000
05000
05000
05000
05000
05000
05000

Street
MIMOSA
M I MOS A
MIMOSA
MIMOSA
MIMOSA
M I MOS A
MIMOSA
MIMOSA
COSTA MCSA
COSTA MESA
COSTA MPSA
COSTA MESA
COSTA MRS A
COSTA MESA
COSTA MPSA
MY9TICH
MYRTICC
MYRTICE
MYRTICE
MYRTICE
MYRTICE
MYRTICE
MYRTICE
MYRTICE
MYRTICE
BLUFFVIEW
BLUFF VI Erf
BLUFFVIEW
BLUFFVIEW
BLUFFVIEW
BLUFFVIEW
BLUFFVIEW
MIDWAY HILLS
MIDWAY MILLS
MIOWAY HILLS
MIDWAY HILLS
M 10 WAY HILLS
MIDWAY HILLS
MIDWAY HILLS
MIDWAY HILLS

Date
05/26/7*
?5/27/76
05/28/76
05/29/76
06/02/76
06/^3/76
06/^4/76
06/05/76
06/05/7*
06/06/76
06/07/76
."16/08/76
06/09/76
^6/1(^/76
(36/1 1/76
26/15/76
06/16/76
'•16/17/76
06/18/76
06/19/76
06/20/76
06/21/76
^6/22/76
06/23/76
06/24/76
05/28/76
05/29/76
05/3CV76
05/31/76
06/^1 /76
06/02/76
06/03/76
06/^3/76
06/^5/76
^ 6/06/7 6
^6/^7/76
,36/^8/76
^6/^9/76
;'56/hV76
:»6/1 1/76
Fr =i f £ \ r
Co-int
336
164
375
358
3^5
4-17
343
421
32 (-1
.3-11
3 15
325
327
321
314
69
4 1
•18
26
06
J6
12
33
21
146
4947
3 6 "17
3193
5977
*>56R
6146
62-P0
6577
7344
6634
-! 1 6 f'
7555
VT'-ll
5338


Air Pb
.65
1 .22
1 .v3
.35
.74
.89
1 ,f)5
1.16
.46
.32
.33
.65
.56
1 .05
.36
.61
.46
.4 i
.41
.71
. 89
.43
.33
.22
.89
1 .50
.61
.60
1 . 02
1.21
1 . 2 -:J
1.33
1.32
.82
.74
1 .53
1.25
.92
1.08
.62
                              293

-------
APPENDIX D (CONTINUED)
05000
05000
05000
05000
05000
05000
0 50 rA 0
05000
05000
10000
10000
10000
10000
10000
10000
10000
10000
10000
10000
10000
I0000
10000
100:50
10000
10000
10000
10000
10000
10000
1 0000
10000
10000
10000
1 5000
1 5000
1500;'
1 500 }
\ 50 0 ;i
15000
TVr'Cc;
RARN'FS
R ARM ES
RARNFS
RAINES
RARNFS
BARMF'S
RARNFS
RA'A'ES
PRA I PI
PRA I R!
PRA IR I
p P A I o i
PRA IP I
PRAIPI
PRA IP I
PRA IP!
OATCS
OATHS
OATFS
OATHS
OATFS
OATFS
OATnS
OATFS
OAT-?
OATHS
OATFS
OATFS
OATPS
OATFS
OAT^S
OATF.S
r-i-.'oon
IN..1 001
I'J.;oOf;
IN (001
I,'! vOOO
L>,: A'Onn
RPIDO1"
nR IOGC
nR Ll'li:
RR I10r-
RR ID OH
^.R lOO^
RR IDGE
PR [OOP
R.RlDOi;
~ CRFFK
E CRFFK
F CRCCK
F CRFFK
F CRFFK
p CR-:FIC
F CRFF!<
F CPFFK























o^t°
06/17/76
0V 1 8/76
06/ 1 9/76
OV20/76
06/21/76
06/22/76
06/23/76
06/24/76
06/25/76
06/04/76
06/05/76
06/06/76
06/07/76
06/08/76
06/09/76
0 VI 0/7 6
06/1 1/76
06/1 1/76
06/12/76
0VI3/76
06/14/76
06/15/76
06/16/76
06/17/76
06/18/76
06/29/76
06/30/76
07/01/76
07/03/76
07/04/76
07/05/76
07/06/76
07/07/76
05/26/76
05/2c
-------
APPENDIX D (CONTINUED)
Traffic
Class
1 5000
15000
15000
15000
15000
1 5000
1 5000
15000
15000
15000
15000
1 5000
15000
15000
15000
15000
1 5000
15000
15000
1500^
15000
15000
15000
20000
200^0
20000
20000
20000
20000
20000
20000
20000
20000
2VW*
2'/J . ,"j ^
H943 .62
M4'iA |.63
13 66 '3 ..74
M 6 7 -' .53
1 7^ M .37
191^2 .97
13475 .94
16 P.I .54
M9!^ I.0.?
1 7221 1 .42
H P P 1 . P
16V55 .67
15569 .53
R '252 .69
-VJ431 .76
P36T 1 . |'J
1 >.•} ^, .V4
P 1 '?": 1 . . ;;
H.^'1 i.";-ri
PW^ 1.62
1 5 12 3 1 . -!- 3
21 177 .62
2n 3 '"-3 1 . 6 J
I>1|4 .31
19625 l.-.)o
2 i.^9 .97
2 '6 -i- 1 .M,-
196o^ 1.42
2PM 1.19
R3r.3 1.42
2-U7- 1.16
16 M- l.j?
17 '. '-. .25
ispii ?.-.•: 3
P534 .77
                                06/-17/76
                                295

-------
APPENDIX D (CONTINUED)
Traffic
Class
20000
20000
20000
20000
20000
20000
20000
20000
25000
25000
25000
25000
25000
25000
25000
25000
25000
25000
25000
25000
25000
25000
25000
25000
25000
25000
25000
25000
25000
25000
25000
25000
25000
Street
MOCKINGBIRD
MOCKINGBIRD
MOCKINGBIRD
MOCKINGBIRD
'{OCKINOBIRD
MOCKINGBIRD
MOCKINGBIRD
MOCKINGBIRD
N. W. HWY
N. W. HWY
N. W. HWY
N. W. HWY
N. ;v. HWY
N. W. HWY
N. W. HWY
N. W. HWY
N. W. HWY
N. W. HWY
N. W. HWY
N. W. HWY
N. W. HWY
N. 'ft. HWY
N. W. HWY
N. W. HWY
N. W. HWY
N. A!. HWY
N. W. HWY
CO IT
CO IT
COIT
COIT
COIT
COIT

Date
06/24/76
06/25/76
06/26/76
06/27/76
06/28/76
06/29/76
06/30/76
07/01/76
05/27/76
05/28/76
05/29/76
05/30/76
05/31/76
06/02/76
06/03/76
,36/04/76
06/05/76
06/06/76
06/07/76
06/04/76
06/05/76
06/06/76
06/07/76
06/08/76
06/09/76
06/10/76
06/1 1/76
06/22/76
07/02/76
07/04/76
07/05/76
07/06/76
07/07/76
fr^flc
Count
13790
21 197
10877
1 3878
17902
18495
16857
13345
42529
45805
.33762
33700
42800
41079
42899
41602
3^846
33716
38950
4038 1
3801 8
31477
32835
31217
.35137
3^345
31 998
.31542
26355
20483
20481
24572
164.30

Air Pb
1.37
1.37
.73
.93
1 .20
1.94
1.01
.97
1.34
4.93*
2.33
2.06
3.56
1.51
1.91
2.32
.93
.82
1.89
2.22
.95
.88
1.51
.69
.74
.53
.22
.67
.38
.63
1 .61
.84
2.40
   Rejected as outlier (P « .001)
                                 296

-------
                      APPENDIX E



      The variables tap water lead, soil lead, indoor

dust lead, windowsill wipe lead, and traffic for each

household are given in Appendix E.  The abbreviated

captions and units are given below.
      Hsld. ID

      Site

      H20


      Soil

      # Days


      Idust



      Wsill


      Traffic
Household ID

Traffic density site

Lead concentration in tap water
       (yg/ml)

Lead concentration in soil  (ug/g)

Actual number of sampling days
      for indoor dust

Lead concentration in indoor
      dust  (ug/cm2)adjusted to
      to a 28 day base

Lead concentration in windowsill
      wipe dust (ug/cm2)

Actual traffic count
                            297

-------
APPENDIX E
 Hsld.
    .ID    Site
H20
Soil   #Days     Idust     WslH  Traffic
150.0
2435
5115
5880
7240
0005
0010
0015
0,025
0050
0055
0060
0065
0070
0075
0080
0090
0100
0J05
0120
0130
0135
0140
0J45
0J50
0155
0160
0165
0170
0180
0250
0255
0260
0265
0270
0275
1395
.1400
1405
1410
0.0009
0.0000
0.0005
0.0002
0.0004
0.0003
0.0002
0.0000
0.0000
0.^)004
0.0017
0.0003
0.0009
0.0021
0..0003
0.0005
0.0002
0.0000
0.0000
0.0008
0.0003
0.0012
0.0007
0.0005
0.0012
0.0009
0.0000
0.0003
0.0000
0.0016
0.0006
0.0000
0.0013
0.0003
0.0010
0.0003
0.0000
0.0020
0.0000
69.78

6. 10
38.61
36.58
40.64
39.62
54.87
45.72
75.19
1 18.88
127.01
49.79
49.79
424.47
481 .07
86.37
184.92
81.29
95.51
168.67
29.47
28.43
22.34
44.69
47.73
133.03
63.98
140. 14
76. 17
82.26
157.41
60.93
481.07
61 .94
1 10.69
77. 18


27
27
28
27
27
27
27
27
27
31
27
27
27
27
27
29
28
47
27
27

27
27
27
27
28

27
28
28
28
27
28
27
27


0.0035
0.0055
0.0080
0.001 1
0.0024
0.0059
0.0(327
0.0046
0.0015
0.0033
0.0000
0.0048
0.0062
0.0030
0.0038
0.0027
0.0031
0.0032
0.0146
0.0029

0.0062
0.0022
0.001 .1
0.0054
0.0013

0.0122
0.0113
0.0235
0.0164
0.0024
0.0065
0.0016
0.0012


0.0838
0.3143
0. 1 162
0.0104
0.0000
0.0093
0.0000
0.0461


0.0246
0.0050
0.01 16
0.0061
0.0183
0. 0049
0.0954
0.01 15
0.0126
0. 0400
0.0545
0,0127
0.0403
0.0926
0. 1349
0.041 1
0. 1282
0.0332
0.0384
0.0421
0. 0300
0.0152
0.0000
0. 1 172
0.0563


320
320
194
599
558
558
186
596
596
596
599
599
529
529
537
346
346
336
336
336
336
336
336
.346
336
472
596
474
155
346
471
.155
202
155
155
                               298

-------
APPENDIX  E (CONTINUED^
 Hsld.
    10
Soil
I dust
Wsill
1415 1
1420
1 42 5
1515
1520
15.30
15.35
1540
1550
1560
1565
1840
1845
1850
1855
1860
187(5
1875
1390
1895
1900
1905
1915
1925
2145
2 1 60
2165
217.3
21 75
2200
2205
24 1 ,•)
2440
2460
2465
2470
2480
2485
2490
2500
0.^006
0.0000
0. 0^02
'0.0004
0.0002
0.0000
0.0000
0.0005
0.0000
0.0'^ 00
0.^002
0.0043
0.0000
0.^014
0.0005
0.0008
0.0000
0.0006
0.0008
0.0000
0.0010
0.0000
0.0004
0 . 00 0 0
0.0013
0.0009
0.0007
0.0000
0.0007
0.0006
•1.0002
0. 0005

0.0r*00
<••).• ?OH2
0. 1000
0.0000
0.0007
0. -5009
',). 00(52
8 7 . 3 3
47.73
1 17.80
1 13.82

73 ).09
8. 1 3
33.56
96.61
103.32
2 OH. 40
73.22
65.09
95.60
1 15.93
43.81
27.46
14.74
29.49
I 0 . I 7
29.49
17.29
43.31
45.77
243. 83
2 9 1.21
46.49
63.63
65.70
1 0 1.03
17 6., 38
51.54
26'\34
26.23
3'?. 5.51
271 .67
147.57
51.5 6
37.93
37.40
27
27
27
23
29
27
27
23
27
38
27
23
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
28
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
pp.
27
27
27
?7
27
30
27
23
:\i
21
0.0030
0.0010
0.0041
0.001 3
0 . 0 06 1
0.0027

0.0000
0.0089
0.009 1
0.0027
0.0037
0.0030
0.0/57 1
0.0155
0.0029
0.0000
0.0022
0.0026
0.0026
0.0024
0.0012
(1.0022
0.0285
0.001 3
0 . 0 ^ \ 2
0 . 0 1 1 8
0.0029
0.0 '3 50
0.0000
0.0038
ii.0.524
0.0056
0.0033
0.0013
0.0225
0.0J20
f 1.0 '06 3
0 . 0 02 7
0.0059
0.0143
3.0248


0.047'}
0.0574
0.0356
0.0742
0.01 56
0.2126

0.02 13
0. 10.35
0.0242
0.0082
0.4133
0. 0148
0. 044 1
0.0064
0.0070
0.01 57
0. 1375
0.0539
0.0369
0. 0.304
0.0000
0.0503
0.0165
0. 0206
0.0097
0.0087
0.0227


0.0451
0. 2273
0.0071
0. (52 19
0.07)59
0.0602
343
255
343
571
571
571
571
571
571
57 1
571
320
194
194
194
335
335
.3.35
320
320
320
32 0
335
320
336
173
173
173
471
471
471
479
259
259
259
300
300
474
474
364
                                299

-------
APPENDIX E (CONTINUED)
H.sld.
ID
2505
3105
31 15
3210
3220
3225
3230
3425
3435
3665
3670
3675
3695
3870
3875
3900
3905
5380
5390
5395
55/5
5590
5645
5660
5665
5670
5675
5685
5700
5725
7185
7265
7290
90 1 0
901 5
9020
9070
9075
9090
9095
Site
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
H20
0.0000
0.0035
0.0022
0.0005
0.0058
0.0002
0.-1000
0.0010
:3.0003
0.0041
0.0003
0.0002
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0010
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000

0.0005
0. W02
0.001 2
0.0020
0.0000
0.75000
0.0^13
0.0000
0.0002
0.0004

0.0009
0.0000
0.^006
0.0000
0.0008
0.0004
0.0000
Soil :
56.60
97.22

73.69
47.07
143.27
74.71
104. 38
1 10.52
61 .40
148.38
103.48
1 1 1 .55
1 35.08
56.23
1 90.67
26.0.5
1 1 1 .65
53.03
214. 14
28.77
95.57
55.63
31 .55
32.48
26.91
34. 33
105.57
173.24
51 . 44
39 . 3 1
37.39
230. 34
312.67

167.56
156.97
59.71
145.42
91 .49

27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
28
27
29
29
27
28
28
28
29
27
29
27
27
27
27
29
27
27

27
28
27
27
27
27
26
29
29
Irfust
0.004 1
0.0043

0.0187
0.0 157
0.0:167
0.0066
0.0055
0.0095
0.0027
0.0030
0 . 0 1 1 1
0.0030
0.0086
.1.0.32 1
0.0092
0.001 1
0.0 59 1
0.0025
0.0016
0.0024
0.0039
0.0020
0. 0-332
0 .001 0
0.0102
0.0 126
0 . 0 08 0
0.0043
0 . 0 '52 0

0.0059
0.0068
0.0030
0.0073
0.4712
0.0041
0.0028
0.0 132
°'i .001 0
Wsill
0 . 0 1 49
0.0231

0.0312
0.0139
0. 1728
0. 3.309
0.0087
0.0102
0.0390
0.0264
0.4468
0.0506
0.01 55
0.0093
0.0867
0.0124
0. 1749
0.2145
0.2357
0.0031
0.0193
0.0126
0.0296
0.0242
1.9540
0.0303
0.2196
0.0337
0.0012
0.0102

0. 1906
0. 0159
0. 2072
0.0819
0.0261
0.0479
0.0298

Traffic
364
9538
6577
1 1765
1 1 765
1 1 76 5
1 I7-S5
8651
6654
12514
12514
12514
12514
1 1467
1 1467
1 '32W
10200
130 00
1 3000
1 3(W J
10637
1241 1
9362
9362
1 1765
12411
10637
12514
1 1765
1241 1
9098
12331
1 2 3.3 1
7154
7154
6776
7154
7154
7154
7154
                                300

-------
APPENDIX E (CONTINUED)
Hs 1 d.
in
9100
9 105
91 15
9125
9130
9195
9205
9210
9215
9220
9225
9230
9235
9280
9285
9290
9295
9300
9305
9310
9315
9325
9340
9345
9360
9365
9370
9380
9390
9485
9490
3080
3090
3100
3310
3335
3650
3660
4020
4025
Sites
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
H20
0.0001
0.0000
0.0000
;).0000
0.0002
0.0003
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0002
0.0002
0.0000
0.0000
0.0003
0.0004
0.0000
0.0000
0.0002
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0002
0.0007
0.0002
0.0004
0.0003
0.00150

0.0010
0.0004
0.0004
0.0008
0.0000
0."|004
0.0007
0.0000
0.0003
0.0004
Soil t
235.30
494. 17
124.71
58.74
1 10.74
73.78
102.56
540.84
72.57
122.83
307.49
145. 14
84. 19
200.30
196.43
163.05
57.09
83.22
64.83
109.34
106.44
49.84
144. 17
3.87
77.44
3 1 .77
iflv.21
140.98
169.78
41.70
298.84
1 37. 1 3
63.41
91 .08
38/1.35
345. V2
226.36
1 19.73
104.97
8! .86
£nRv^
27
27
27
27
27
28
27
34
28
28
28
28
28
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
29
29
21
37
27
27
27
20
27
27
28
27
27
27
27
28
27
31
28
28
Id'ist
0.0178
(\ 0.590
0.0 (Ml
v',.0123
0.0 ^72
0.001 1
0. 0403
0.0,138
0.0314
0.0012
0.0043
0.0083
0. 0:52 4
,'.0736
0.0100
0.0037
0.0054
0.0204
0.0138
0.0304
0.01531
Pi.0-:5?9
d.0598
0 . 0 02 5
0.15022
0.0135
0.0624
0.0056
0.0048
0.0038
0.0050
0.001 2
r'. 0(3 17
0.0362
3.0802
0 . 0 ' 5™ 0
0.0624
'.'1.1,1 553
0.0036
(1.0,352
rtstll



0.029 1
0.02R6
0.0249
0. 1 190
0.4858
0.3855
0.0350
0. 0330
0.8182
3.3286
0.3980
0.0217
0.0318
0.0125
0.0279
0.0130
0. 1 128
0.0196
0.0247
0.0529
0. 0986
0.07 16

0.0439
0.0466
0.0282

0. 1563
0.0140
0.0174
?!.02 27
0. 0523
0.0342
0.0147
0. 0509
0.0653
0.0092
Tr =\ f f t c
7154
1 154
71 -54
7154
7 1 54
8209
1 708
1708
1708
1338
1338
1338
1 1 338
11817
1 1 494
8197
13072
1 3072
8464
r;708
8464
9456
9456
9456
9456
1 1708
1 1 708
13072
9456
1 1 494
5918
16219
16219
16219
13800
1 3300
16128
16128
17931
17931
                                  301

-------
APL>ENT>_X £  (CONlir.JU.LD)
Hsld.
    ID    Site
H20
Soil   #Day.s     Must    Wsill   Traffic
5080
5085
5090
5095
5100
5105
5130
5! 35
5165
5240
5365
5370
5400
5405
5440
5445
5455
5460
5465
5^70
5430
54915
5495
55*15
5510
5520
5525
5540
5545
5550
5555
5565
5585
5595
5605
5625
5635
5630
5690
5695
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3

0.0000
0.0003
0.0005
0.0002
0.0004
0.0004
0.M010P!
0.0003
0.0000
0.0005

0.0000
0. 00 H0
0.0000
0.0003
0.00 13
0.0PI02
0.0003
0.0002
0.0000
0.0009
0.0009
0.0000
(/). n^0r/i
0.0004
0.0000
0.0004
0.1^007
0.000Q
0.0004
0.0005
0. Mf/HKI
l>. 0(^00
0.000"}
0.0000
'4.(V02
0.0002
0.0008
•'.0009
33. 15
30. 70
1 12.59
73. 50
31 .64
9! . 18
236.95
1^7.21
137.70
7R. 16
153.52
141.43
124.68
45.39
39. 16
7,3. 32
2 5 3 . '0 1
1 87.80
58.74
1 14.82
1 30.84
70. 31
69.43
1 10.36
84.55
62.68
236.03
236.07
16.79
61.33
222.03
67. 74
2 39.61
77.95
337.87
1 16.56
I 3. 91
62. 1 7
7' 1.3 3
105.57
27
27
28
27
27
28
27
27
26
27
29

28
27
28
28
27
30
28
28
28
28
28
28
27
23
27
28
23
27
39
23
28
28
23
27
27
31
27
27
0. 0.579
0.001 5
'.,.0100
0.0030
',-1.0037
0.0027
0.0097
0.0030
0.0073
0.0055
0.0024

0 .0127
0.0150
0.0,512
0.0026
0.0046
0.0047
0.0000
0.0037
0.0104
0.001 8
0. 003!
0.0337
0.0019
0.0023
0.0.563
0.0097
0.0052
0.0032

0.0035
0.0053
0.0233
0.0038
0.0330
0.0041
0.0(532
0.0063
0.0020
0. 0974
0.0333
0.0, ')80
0. 1608
0.15097
0.0180
0. 0142
0.2062
0.2792

0. 1411

0.0065

0.0203
0.0563
0. 0385
0.01 77
0. 0336
0.0171
0.0331
0.0256
0. 1234
0.4252
0. 1405
0.0714
0.2477
0.0364
0. 1041
0. 0404
4.6857
0.0746
0.0739
0.0407
0.0105
0.3451
0.0391
0.0071
0.0471
0.0:500
13790
1 879 1
18790
13790
13790
1 3790
14000
14000
13245
13835}
15257
15257
15570
1 5570
16832
16882
15442
15442
18245
13245
17452
17452
1 8543
17000
1 5000
13300
14000
190 '50
13245
17000
1 3800
16500
1 8245
16381
17119
13354
18354
1 3354
18543
17119
                               302

-------
APPENDIX E  (CONTINUED)
Hsld.
in
5705
5715
5730
5735
5740
5745
5755
5760
5765
5770
5775
5780
5785
5850
7075
7 I 00
7340
7385
7580
7605
7620
7630
7655
7705
7720
7745
7775
7850
0470
0475
3700
5225
5230
5360
54 1 0
5415
5485
7170
7130
7220
Site
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
H2D
0.000 0
0.0005
0.0000
0.0000
0.000?
0.0000
0.0000
','.'1000
0.ft00ft
0.0003
0.^00 0
0.0000
0 . 00 0 0
0.0002
0.0002
0.0005
0.0002
0.0000
0.0003
0. 0005
0.0<7103
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0003
0.0000
0.0028
0.0000
0.0009
0.0000
0.ftft05
0.0003
0.0000
0.0(7100
0.0000
0.0006
0.0013
0.0004
0.0025
0.0003
80 il -
65.87
93.84
160.6?
31.21
27.07
109. 18
1 !">.09
434.4 1
76.70
39.33
79.40
1 33.84
347. 53
170.54
1 1- ! . 8 9
387. 13
33.2'1
1 78.3?
492. 97
203.40
203.40
1 46 . 2 2
132. 16
1 36. 84
68 . 60
401 .34
33.27
55. 13
54. M
1 86.65
191. 3 6
1 60.96
47.45
76. 30
58.7 >r
56.07
40.05
1 17.92
95. 37
260.22
frnny.
28
33
23
28
23
23
30
27
28
27
27
29
28
23
27
23
28
28
27
27
27
27
27
29
28
27
27
27
27
35
28

27
28
23
28
27
27
PR
3 1
lH,,*t
0.01 'f:l
0.0445
11.0080
0 .016 0
0.0063
0.0123
0.0047
0.0022
0 . PHI Q
0.0199
0.0160
'1.0080
0.01^3
0.0,170
0.0017
01.0153
0.0128
0.0240
0.0036
0.00! 3
0.007 1

0.0044
0.0057
0.006 1
0.0045
0.001 7
0.0094
0.0080
'..0033
0.0157

ft. 00 3 4
ft. 006 7
0.00 17
< * ft 1 T I
• ' • I I \
0 . '-; ft i 7
'- 1.003 5
ft .0 } I ft
0.0065
,-lL Tr,
ft 03^7
0.2357
0.01 32
0.5395
0.01 1 3
0.0483
0. 0248
O. 0469
0.0193
0.0289
0.2812
'A. 0208
0. 01 05
0.0157
0.0ft9!
0.0175
0.2517
O. 0875
0.0230
0.2223
0.0322
0.5377

0. ftf^ft ft
0.0108
0.0302
0.0043
0.0053
0.7161
0. 1 126
ft. 0 ft 42
0.5263
0.2164
•'". 1 580
0.0043
0. 1258
0 . ft4 1 I
O. 7964
0.0583
-0. 0O4 1
=if ^i r
7119
1515 6
37-M
37/10
37-lfl
370,1
377M
3700
37T0
1 3700
3 7'i 0
3700
37-1 1
6536
3790
3790
6331
633 1
8790
3790
3634
3684
3684
3424
4500
3634
3790
8216
7047
3354
37350
^089J
^0362
20923
20923
20928
2.0890
20483
21 340
2.1432
                               303

-------
APPENDIX E (CONTINUED)
l-hld.
    ID    Site
H20
Sni. 1
IdMSt
Wsill  Traffic
7225
727H
7275
7390
7395
74! 5
7515
7520
7525
7545
7550
7585
7610
7640
7645
7650
7660
7665
7670
7675
7680
7635
7690
7700
771 5
7725
7735
7750
7760
7765
7780
7785
7790
7795
7800
7805
7810
781 5
7820
7825
7830
7835
7840
7845
9465
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
0.0062
0.0004
0.0003
0 . 00 0 0
0.00(53
0.0000
0.0000
0.0002
0.0004
0.0009
0.0004
0.0002
0.0003
0.0009
0.0006
0.0002
0.0000
0.0009
0.0000
0.0021
0.0000
0.0004
0.0007
0.0003
0. "1(7)02
J.0002

0.0006
0.0000
0.0013
0.0945
0.001 1
0.0000
0.0000
0.0007
0.0000
0.0000
0.0007
0.0002
0.°>009
0.0008
0.0000
0.0000

0.0013
86.28
214.37
1 60. 10
127.51
175.44
78.61
71 .90
1 17.92
222.63
53.43
22 1 .67
1 57.47
100.29
620. 1 9
233.06
76.86
136.84
76.86
79.67
30.93
79.67
29.06
92.79
312.74
60.34
64.64
169.2 1
471 .77
262. 14
65.59
101 .72
52.29
1 53.06
50.89
173.01
112.18
212.03
26.62
54. 10
8?. 70
349.34
106.47
55. 1 3
56.09
39.85
27
27
27
32

25
27
32
27
28
27
32
27

27
32
27
29
27
27
31
27
23
28
27
27
27
27
27
27
29
27
27
27
28
29
28
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
28
0.0113
0.0035
(1.0133
0 . 0 1 1 7

0.0074
0.0000
0.0332
0.0073
0.0142
0.0027
0.0488
0.0045

0.0033
0.0016
0.0130
0 . 0 02 5
0 . 0 1 5 0
0.0099
^.0070
0.0030
0 . 0 0 1 7
0.0027
0.0074
0.0056
0.0J32
0.0262
0.0057
0.01 44
0.0032
0.0057
0.0023
0.004 1
0.0224
0.0036
0.0022
0.0040
I1. 01 17
0.0057
0.0093
0.0075
0.0074
0.0030
0.0038
•0.0949
0.0643

0.0246
0. 0057
0.0641
0.0044
0. 1065
0.0161
0.0238
0.0147
0.21 18
0. 03 15
0.0837
0. 1 169
0.051 3
0. 9109
0.01 32
0.3727
0.0185
0.0036
0. 1710
0. 1531
0. 1206
0.0063
0.0094
0.0269

0.0358
0. 0602
0.0189
0.0180
0.0090
0.0592
0. 1 392
0.0426
0. 0601
0.0174
0.0662
0.0149
0. 0245

0.0000
0.0175
0. 0365
20432
20432
20432
23835
23885
22670
37850
37850
37850
37350
37850
20432
37850
27537
37850
20fl fl0
31542
31542
31542
19578
19578
31542
20141
20572
20483
21300
20432
21300
2 1 300
20432
31542
3 1 542
31542
20928
20432
20928
20141
31542
31542
31542
31542
31542
31 542
20432
20362
                               304

-------
                          APPENDIX F

       Appendix F contains the variables handwipe lead,  blood lead,

and traffic counts for each participant (children only).  The units are

given below.
       Site
       Traffic Count
       Part. ID
       Handwipe Pb
       Blood Pb 1
Traffic density site
Actual traffic count
Participant ID
Lead concentration in handwipe sample (|Jg/cm )
Lead concentration in blood sample 1 (^lg/100 ml)
                               305

-------
APPENDIX F
Traffic
te Count
320
194
599
558
553
558
186
^6
596
D96
399
1 599
1 ^29
529
346
336
336
336
336
336
346
346
336
1 336
1 472
T96
506
346
346
202
67 1
1 571
I-- -i t
5/ 1
i .— 	 , .
' 57 1
1 194
1 3 3 5
I_
320
1 ^20
1 173
I. 	
17 *
1 471
Part.
ID
0007
0017
0026
0052
0053
0059
006 1
0066
0072
;i077
,•109 1
0:^92
,'103
0107
0132
0 1 52
0156
0 1 6 1
0 1 6 7
0163
0172
0173
0 1 82
•3 M 3
0252
0257
0253
0271
02 72
402
53 1
532
561
562
352
362
392
393
2 1 72
2173
2201
H^rr^w i o°
Pb
10.82
9. 22
2.22
7. 37
3.84
8. 42
9.27
3.35
11.37
7.73
1.83
7. 1 1
6. 12
5.60
4.25
13. 35
1 . 64
7. 10
2.29
9. 79
6.54
1 . 6<3
5. 19
7.50
5. 38
1 1.53
10.71
8.45
3.36
6.57
3.34
14. 31
4.62
39.73
5. 39
17.371
3.84
1 . 92
26. 30
5. 21
3. 34
Rlor><-f
Pb 1
6.40
17.47
30. 90
36.00
17.81
1 3.70
19.60
3 1 . 3P!
10.40
15. 12
19.70
5.40
28.20
5.40
14. 10
9. 10
19.60
R. 30
1 3.90
15.10
15.93
11 .06
12.00
8.10
17.00
16.08
15.80
16. 30
7.25
1 3.29
7.50
1 1 . 93
1 1 .93
9. 36
14.86
1 4.R0

10.41
18.40
20. R^
17.60
                        306

-------
APPENDIX F   (CONTINUED)
Site

e
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
3
2
2
3
3
T
3
3
3
4
4
f r =if f i c
Count
471
474
364
364
1 1765
1 1765
16128
12514
12514
1251 4
12514
1 1467
20390
20928
20028
20923
200? 3
7452
3548
7000
7000
5'. * 0 0
8245
3300
650,1
3245
638 1
7119
P3.62
1 I 765
13354
2514
1 7*5
370T
37i'0
3700
3700
3700
6536
20433
20432
D^rt .
ID
2206
2437
2501
2502
3226
3227
3662
3667
36/2
3673
3697
3876
5227
5362
54 1 2
541 3
5417
5493
5497
5507
5508
5512
5547
5557
5567
5586
5597
5606
5662
5667
5681
5686
6701
5732
o757
5771
5776
5731
5352
7171
7272
U^n,-fwi Qra
°b
5.72
12.04
6. 82
5. 54
11.01
1 2. 46
12.^0
5.57
10.57
1 1 .69
10. 14
6. 54
9.23
4. 1 3
4. 42
6.72
6.65
7. 30
3.33
10.08
1 9 - 03
17. P6
23.30
1 3.29
9. 70
19. 73
6. ?3
4.23
4. 13
8. 68
4. ?5
6. 86
2.99
4. }1
4.90
3.03
7. 40
1 8 . 6 3
7. 34
12.70
3. 45
nl^n8
Pb 1
3 1 . 00
1 M. 03
11.10
1 4 . 4 71
1 7 . 06
24.^5
12.90
1 4.40
1 7 . 06
1 2.38
1 3.48
16.^8
15.80
15.95
20.80
9.50
21 .*0
R. 20
17. f0
16. 10
24.20
1 ^.64
15.61
5.40
12.70
1 9.^0
19.70
* . 10
15.90
? 3.4f/l
10.52
1 "> . 44
13. 35
1 3.70
14. 40
•50.5'?
1 7 . 00
1 ^. 70
1-4.46
17.1'*
1 1 . 60
                          307

-------
APPENDIX F  (CONTINUED)

Site
2
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
.4
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
n
£.
2
2
4
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
3
i'ra f f i c.
Count
12331
21835
27537
37850
20572
14500
2 1 300
2 1300
31542
31542
20928
2.4928
20141
31542
13216
7154
7154
1 1 333
1 1333
11317
3197
3197
1 3072
1 3(372
13072
9708
9708
1 1 708
13072
9456
20362
17047
17047
1 1 494
5918
5918
59 18
5913
17452
Part.
ID
7291
7392
7642
7647
7702
7722
7752
7753
7787
7783
7797
7807
7312
7817
7351
9071
9131
9221
9237
9282
9292
9293
9297
9302
9303
9312
931 3
9372
9382
9392
9466
9471
9472
9437
9492
9493
9494
9496
5492
4qn --
-------
                          APPENDIX  G

       The variables listed in Appendix G pertain to identification

of the participant and the blood analyses.  Abbreviated  captions are

explained below and units are given for each variable.
Hsld. ID
Site
Traffic  Count
DOW
Part. ID
Sex
Age
Blood Pb 1

Blood Pb 2

HCT 1
HCT 2
FEP 1
FEP 2
CO 1
CO2
Smok. code
Paint
- Household ID
- Traffic density site
- Cars/day
- Day of week on which the traffic count was made
- Participant ID
- Sex of the participant (1 = Male; 2 = Female)
- Age of the participant
- Blood lead measurement (|_lg lead/100 ml blood) from
  blood sample 1
- Blood lead measurement (|_lg lead/100 ml blood) from
  blood sample 2
- Hematocrit value from blood sample 1
- Hematocrit value from blood sample 2
- FEP value from blood sample  1 (p.g/100 ml RBC's)
- FEP value from blood sample  2 (|_lg/100 ml RBC's)
- % carbon monoxide in blood sample 1 (ml/100 ml)
- % carbon monoxide in blood sample 2 (ml/100 ml)
- Smoking  Code     # packs/day
        0                 0 (does not  smoke)
        1               £1/2
        2                 1
        3                 1 1/2
       4                 2
- Highest of the four paint values for the household (mg/cm  )
                                 309

-------
             APPENDIX  G
u>
\->
o
Hsld. Traffic
ID Site Count
1530
1 H90
2brtH
t)075
0105
01 55
0'125
HI50
Ml 60
0165
0255
I860
1890
22C15
0v155
>H590
24.-S5
25M0
01 70
1560
0120
2480
1425
2470
1410
1 550
1515
2160
1540
2165
571
320
364
596
529
336
599
336
3.36
336
596
335
320
471
558
599
474
.364
346
571
5.37
300
34.3
300
155
571
• 571
178
571
I7B
OOW
3
3
5
5
5
2
4
2
2
2
5
4
3
5
4
4
5
5
2
3
5
3
3
3
2
3
3
2
3
2
Pirt.
ID SRX Aoo
15.31
1892
2501
0077
'-1107
0156
0(126
0152
0161
0167
M258
IH62
IH93
2206
0058
0092
2487
2502
0172
1 56 ->
0122
2481
U26
2471
141 1
1551
1517
2162
1541
2167
HI
01
01
02
02
02
03
03
H.3
03
03
03
03
03
05
05
05
05
06
06
60
60
61
61
65
65
66
67
6t5
72
TlnnH
Pb 1
7.50

11.10
15. 12
5.40
19.60
30.90
9. 10
8 . 30
1 3 . 90
15.80
14.80
10.41
31 .'10
I7.8I
5.40
I 0.08
I 4. 40
I 5. 98
9.36
12.95
24.52
12.24
I 3. 88
I2.5I
14.07
1 4. 64
I I. 22
18.73
15.73
Tloo-1
Pb 2
1 4 . 4 'A
9.50
10.60
22.9£1

22.50
8.80
12.90
7.30
1 .ftPI
4.30
M.20
1.12
3.50
7.12
29. tin
10.39
7.9M
IH. 17
8.76
12.94
1 1.25
12.42
14.47
15.00
16.00
12.17
10.13
16.47
16.75
HCT 1



36






35

38

42

38

39
37
45
41
46
44
48
43
39
43
45
37
MCI ?
37
36
3i1


32
33
35
35
• 35
36
33
4.1
38
39
37
37
37
39
37
41
33
44
41
45
41
.39
1/1
48
4:-)
FEP 1



48








80

IM

7.3

70
98
107
My
43
2 '/i
87
21
56
53
146
83
FRP 2 CO 1 CD 2












121 .1

177 .1 .1

47 .1 .1

ML .2
R9
I cm .1 .3
114 .3 .8
44
67 .1 .2
81 .2
51 .8
71
82 .2 .2
47 .1 .2
43 .1 .3
Co.-!*? 9 -Tint
.2
2. 5
. •-•)
1. i
. .)
I. 6
I . I
I . 5
2.7
. )
I'!. I
.2
'1 2.5
6. >
(1 . ;1
. .1
'1 . .1
. .)
(1 I.I
.9
:1 1 . 4
1 . 1
.2
v'i . ,i
..; 1 . 5
1 .5
3.2

-------
APPENDIX  G (CONTINUED)
Hslr).
ID Sltf
M030
2465
0140
24/4-)
0.)5k4
0 1 in.'
00yii
0 I 30
0 I 80
!H155
0250
I41HJ
0270
I ('. 50
2 I /W
•MM 5
IK1I5
0"160
0065
Ml 65
Ml 7U
0 1 r)0
0255
I5i'5
22lH1
(1070
2170
1 560
0 1 55
1 520
Traffic
Count
599
259
336
259
558
529
599
.346
336
5 58
472
2M2
346
194
178
320
194
186
596
336
346
3.36
596
571
471
596
178
571
3.36
571
now
4
2
2
2
4
5
4
2
2
4
3
3
2
4
2
3
4
4
5
2
2
2
5
3
5
5
2
3
2
3
Part.
in 5
0081
246/
0142
2441
0052
i) 1 (1 3
!)09 1
.1 1 .32
/)I82
0059
0252
1402
0271
1852
217?
0110 /
0.1 1 7
0:-16 1
0r;>66
0168
0173
018.3
0257
15.32
22/11
007 ">
217.3
1561
0157
1521
i
. \)
. ..t
.5
. ••>
1. 1
2. /
1.1. 1
0 .2
*. )
1 '•> . I)
. .)
. y
1 . 6
i 1 . '-)

-------
            APPENDIX G (CONTINUED)
OJ
H-1
hJ
llsld.
ID Slt(
0265
I85H
00 1 5
0250
0 1 50
1400
1 530
1890
02 7 H
005;')
0 1 <10
0255
I860
0I60
2205
0025
0I30
H I 70
2 I 70
0005
0055
(II 65
I875
2485
0I0H
0I05
0I45
0060
22-40
I 845
Traffic
? Count f
1 55
I94
I94
472
336
202
57!
320
.346
558
.3.36
596
335
336
47!
599
346
.346
I 78
320
558
336
335
474
529
529
336
I 86
47!
I 94
~\f)i.'l
2
4
4
3
2
.3
3
3
2
4
2
5
4
2
5
4
2
2
2
3
4
2
4
5
5
5
2
4
5
4
Part.
in 5
0267
1 85 1
00 I 6
025I
0 I 5 1
I 40 I
1 53 3
I 89 1
0272
005 I
0I8I
0256
I 36 1
0I62
2207
0027
0I3I
0I7I
2I7I
0006
0056
0I66
I 376
2486
0I0I
0I06
HI 46
0062
2202
I 846
5ex
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2-
2'
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
a.ne
23
23
25
25
26
26
26
26
27
28
28
28
23
29
29
30
30
.30
39
3
3
3
3
3
33
33
33
34
34
35
Blood
Pb I
I 7 . 00
5. 18
I 3.55
1 0.59
9.28
5. 18
9. in
5. 18
7.25
10. I 8
1 0.4 I
14.25
5.7I
8.06

10.87
3.75
I 1. 69
8.09
I6.0I
6.94
6.48
I5.9I
I 2. 00
I I . 1 0
9.94
6.22
6.0 1
II. 10
3.44
8 1 oor|
Pn 2 h
15.69
4.59
10.36
12.06
8.12
6.94
9.29
5.00
16.99
10.0-1
10.1.3
12.57
7.26
7.54
8.99
1 1 . 38
8. II
10.34
6.24
1 0 . 85
7.75
5.25
13.73
10.64
12.95
9.90
5.83
5. II
10.53

or i H
35
35
42
34
41
39
46
40
34
43
42
35
43
44
44
4M
37
43
41
45
44
43
47
47
41
4.3
38
40
46
41
CT 2 t
41
33
11
38
.39
37
38
4 t
.37
38
42
43
43
43
34
42
38
43
41
37
.39
* 42
3")
45
41
41
39
33
35
4'-l
~P.n 1
199
103
Q'J
97
62
107
55
1 19
128
4
127
79
151
58

19
89
51
49
1 19
3;i
85
118
1 f*3
47
IH
96
4:5
55
2'W
S:n
FRP 2 00 1 CO 2 C
'fl 76
• 68
105
68
94
131 . i!
l?8 I.I
95
96
100
87 .9
48
85
72 .1
66
66
70
64
IP5 . 1
61
124
101 .2
197
75 .2
118
67
58
128
93 .0

ok.
o.i « "alnt
.2
.5
.9
. '•)
1.6
Ci 1 . /
3 .2
2 . '.)
2. 1
1.4
1 2.7
UK 1
.2
0 2.7
6.5
I.I
.7
1. 1
;'( . *•)
4.5
. ;:)
0 . 'J
.2
0 .,)
. 5
. .)
1. 1
. H
0 3.0
1.4

-------
           APPENDIX  G  (CONTINUED)
U)
I—'
U)
Hslcl.
IU Sttp
1915
2 5' -10
iK)70
2I7'5
(-I26H
1 56 5'
IH95
1195
H 0 1 (•)
1515
249')
IH7D
0115
1405
1425
2505
0140
142(1
2460
1415
1905
24,-Hl
0120
1410
190(1
1925
2410
IH4rJ
2 1 6(1
IH55
Traffic
Count
115
164
596
471
474
571
120
155
.120
571
474
1.15
146
155
141
164
1.16
255
259
14.1
120
100
517
155
.120
32H
479
120
178
194
DOW
4
5
5
5
5
3
3
2
3
3
5
4
2
2
3
5
2
.1
2
.1
3
3
5
2
3
3
5
3
2
4
P.irt.
10
!9I6
2501
Ml \
2176
0261
1566
IH96
1 196
HOI 1
15.16
2491
1871
01 16
1406
1427
2 506
0141
1421
2461
1416
1906
24b2
0121
1412
1901
1927
241 1
IH4I
2161
1 856
Sex
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Aqe
35
36
37
40
42
42
42
43
44
44
44
47
49
49
49
50
52
53
53
54
55
55
56
56
56
brt
59
61
66
67
Ph 1
9. 10
5.12
n.56
10. IH
7.20
H.06
5 . '16
11.96
7.54
11.53
6 . fl 1
1 1.72
9.H9
6. 12 '
6.75
10. in
16.69
9. R9
14.57
1 1.98
9. 11
15.96
17.1 1
6.4H
9.84
9.R9
16. 19
I'.j.'i?
rt.79
1.1.41
llood
Ph 2
7.71
4.50
9.71
1 1 .64
7.90
0.50
6.42
11.57
7 . 5'^)
10.90
5.5M
I2.6H
H.44
6.27
10.13
I(}.0'1
1 .1 . 6!1
9.H4
13.^9
1 W . 99
7.05
17.75
17.00

7.96
10.25
18.69
1 0 . 99
24.52
9.66
HCT 1
44
17
41
45
14
4f1
43
42
41
42
39
47
42
40
41
43
43
42
40
44
4«i
17
41

44
/16
1'i
41
42
42
'iOT 2
19
3 a
43
17
16
•H
19
1 1
11
1H
17
45
41
4U
42
4.1
4?
41
.11
45
1'1
11
3 j
'1 1
41
17
4?
1.1
16
4 1
FEP I
I 14
54
18
20
5d
50
61
78
62
77
65
77
74
1 f6
129
59
97
47
•rbi-t
li-M
1 19
54
in
0
H2
7d
24
r)H
IB
I6>J
F.P2
71
73
79
89
57
121
97
1 12
52
34
lnl
96
92
95
73
IMH
50
75
06
54
05
4:1
UK)

R9
1(53
1(11
HI
123
99
CO 1 CO 2

.1

.0





.2
. 1



. 1
1.2


.7

.2
. 1

. 1
1 . .1

.9



'^TOk .
Co^ Pnlnt
.,
(•\ )
12! j
(1 4. 4
1. 1
. '-1
1. ti
?.7
1.4
D 2.1
.1 . .)
1.4
. /
2. 1
0 .2
2 ..!
.9
1.6
1 . :i
. .)
:i . 2
;) . .•)
1.1
0 I . '-j
?. .'V
I. I
•1 . v>
. /
. /
I.I

-------
            APPENDIX  G (CONTINUED)
OJ
rlsl-1.
If) S
2165
1515
2440
2145
1925
5660
92»>(>
9.:) 7;)
9290
3665
36 7 M
3875
93.10
3225
36/0
9291)
9295
93 1 1)
5685
7290
9485
3695
3220
3425
9230
9345
3I«5
9325
5380
"
ite

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
traffic.
Count r
178
571
259
259
116
320
9362
lid 17
7154
H 197
12514
12514
1 1467
13072
1 1 765
12514
8197
1 3472
9708
12514
12331
1 1494
12514
1 1765
8651
1 1 338
9456
9588
9456
1 3'MW
10W
2
3
2
2
3
3
2
2
3



5
3
3


3
2

3
2

3
4
4
3
3
3

Part.
in se>
2166 ;
isi^ ;
2466 ;
2442 ;
2U6 ;
1926 ;
5662
9282
9M7I
9292
3667
3671
3376
9102
3227
3672
9293
9297
9312
5696
7291
9487
3697
3221
3427
9231
9346
3106
9127
5381
A cj f*
> 6/
1 ^O
? 6V
> 77
> 79
> 84
HI
(11
02
cv?
;*3
(13
(11
i)3
04
04
H4
04
04
05
(15
05
06
51
57
59
59
62
63
68
ninor)
Ph 1
9.012
7. 01
9.H2
7.63
9.94
9.83
15.90
19.60
10.61
14.40
14.40
12.88
16.88
13.113
24.85
1 7 . 06
13. 18
35.84
13.1)3
12.44
23.40
18. 15
13.48
14.64
12.50
1(1.50
8.58
17.36.
1 3. 84
7. (15
Ph 2 \
9 .rid
7.20
9.75
9.82
8. 3D
7.48
13. SCI
14.60
13.57
16. W
14.50
13.2:4
15.61
14.14
27.21
17. Ml
16.30
19.20
15. (-10
16.65
16. hi
15.98
13.57
16.43
15.28
7.58
14.14
14.04
13.37
7.12
or i i
41
4;>
3f
45
43
35
34
37
33
38
37
38
41
39
33
39
38
38
40
33
36
41
45
43
44
4(1
48
46
42
rrr ">. H
41
42
44
15
i;
43
35
35
17
14
39
37
4-)
33
38
33

37
35
37
36
33
38
45
43
44
42
46
45
43
RP 1 F
75
6H
52
3d
81
77


14


08
67
53
28
95
B4
86
43
44

102
1 02
85
89
7;>
1 19
99
59
63
"VI
CP 2 CO 1 00 2 0
67
116 .2
124 .1
97
1 31 . 2


13



70
81
51
1 12


38 .1 .1
118 .1

29
112
85
72 . 1
6'.i
73 . 1
95 . 1
95 .7
26 .1 .>
3K.
oi'l" I'qint
0 3.2
'1 . '•'•
o i! i
. .)
3.3
1 ..-i
1.4
.2
1.4
?.. 1
. •)
. J
1.4
1.4
2.6
.1 R.I
0 I.I

.2
4.7
.2
i< ,2
1.5
il 2.3
ci .;1
1 1 . •'>
," a ^J

-------
             APPENDIX  G  (CONTINUED)
LJ
M
Ul
HsU. Traffic
in 31 1
43
44
44
33
.37
38
39
35
37
39
38
38
.38
35
41
3*!
33
39
38
37
46
37
Snoi: .
ICT 2 F:-:'> I FRP 2 CO I CO 2 Co
43
41
37
34
37

38
3-S
37
.31
36
41
37
41

33
3'J
35
34
4^S
33
40
3
87
93
45
7;-)
25
|i'"9
76
""7
37


1 10
42


48
1 14




57

7(1
57
89
35
102
81 1 . 3
56
4fi
5M .«3 .6
8.3 .2 .1
I2PI . 1
1 18
37 ' 1.7
1 '1 1 .3 . 2
72 . 1
63



ri


. 1
96


58 . 1



96
88
91 .5
95
17
3
«
2.
2 2.
il
^
m
;,1
•1
'1 1.
B
o^
1.
3.
1 1.
2.
3.
">
5.
6.
2.
.1
.
f
•>_
.
i.
2 1.
.
•> ^
5
0
1
5
i,
T
-',
7
.J
6
/
1
6
ij
3
1
( >
2
7
9
1
t)
n
;>
1
i,
'<
i
/
1

-------
           APPENDIX G   (CONTINUED)
U)
in <•
5/K0
3 6ft 5
39M0
94, J5
5675
9295
9100
566 b
92 9i !
.1225
91.170
9I3H
93911
91ft5
y020
3671!
56 H 5
9115
3695
9.190
9170
9205
50 70
9I0C-)
92IK
9.3 1 0
5590
9235
39,15
5575
Jtte
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Traffic
Co'int
1 1 765
12514
IU200
1 1494
10637
13072
1.3072
1 1 765
til 97
1 1765
7154
7154
13072
1 1 70H
6776
12514
12514
7 1 54
12514
9456
1 1 708
1 1 70H
1241 1
7154
1 1 708
97(18
1241 1
11338
1 M^00
10637
now-
3


2
2
1
3
3

3
3
3
3
2"
3


3

3
2
2
6
3
2
2
6
4

2
Part.
in
57M2
3666
3901
94H.1
5676
9296
9301
5*66
9291
3224
9:172
9132
938 1
9166
9C12 I
16 7 1
5687
9116
3696
9391
9171
9206
5671
9101
921 1
931 1
5591
92.16
39H6
5576
Sex
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Ane
24
26
26
26
27
27
27
28
2H
29
29
29
29
.10
31
32
32
32
31
.11
14
37
.19
3M
3 a
3H
39
39
40
41
TlorH
Pi) 1
S.90
12.29
4.66
12.99
7.97

10.61

1 H.50
1 1 . 30
11.14
11.15
21.62
7.40
6.12
9.01
9.32
1 :i . 6 1
(1.71
19.29
15. IB
14.64
17.7.1
1 1 . 99
14.92
12.76
'). 11
1 1.99

>i.67
ninorl
Ph 2
9 . 89
9.Wi
4.78
IP). 15
7.96
8.12
15.^6
5.15
8.4 |
12.42
I3.H6
11.27
1 7 . 58
7.54
6.98
7.54
12.66
12.71
7.26
23.9.3
11.27
13.57
10. 17
9.42
14.72
1 3.70
10.14
1 1 . 04

9.i*>6
HCT 1
.14
39
34
37
43
4. ''I
41

45
37
48
41
5"
42
38

40
41
39
46
44
44
3H
41
41
47
41
42
36
42
MCT 2
14
4'-)
1 \
35
42
41
4'1
41
46
17
41
41
42
4-1
16
17
42
41
41
43
42
44
15
45
19
42
41
33
41
41
FK? I
1 12
122
1 19
36
92
6?»
9.1

61
59
6K
80
44
65
72
0
/14
80
91
67
62
62
I-.1.3
71
89
46
77
,1 |

107
FFtP 2 CO 1 CO 2 Co
105 .3
74 .2
47
A4
1 '17
75
°?
68
1 17
90
193
1.32
49
106
102
68
RB
112
89

54
H3
84 . 1
46
71
97 .1
43
72

69

.2
1.4
1. 1
1. 1
4.7
3. j
6.9
i. :j
,1 . ,)
2.'1>
1. 1
1 8. 3
. •.)
5. 7
.5
1.9

-------
APPENDIX G  (CONTINUED)
ilslr).
if) s
566 0
5/25
3210
90 1 5
9195
94b5
934H
3425
9235
5645
9.195
9215
9090
9345
9O 1 0
53PO
7IH5
31 4)5
5380
36 /^
9230
9360
9225
3230
9 3 05
9315
9125
5/75
5555
5515
1
tte
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
raffle
Count r
9362
1241 1
11765
7154
82M9
1 1494
9456
0651
1 1494
9362
7154
1 1 /0H
7154
9456
7 1 54
1 30H0
909H
96HH
1 3,)0tf
12514
1 1 13H
9456
1 1 330
1 1 /65
SJ464
9464
/I54
13700
1 3800
IH245
)OW
2
6
3
3

2
3
4
2
2
3
2
3
3
3


3


4
•3
4
3
2
2
3
3
3
5
Part.
in <
5661
5726
3211
9(1 1 6
9196
94H6
934 1
3426
9286
5646
9096
9216
9091
9347
9012
5391
7 Id 6
3107
53
37
3 J
4 I
43
3 1
3/
33
3/
F«=P 1 1
46
97
93
71
164
77
39
42
63
og
Pi 3

55
1 13
53
75
58
H2
f»6

• '•)
1. 1
.-1
. •)
0 2.3
4 . j
• 1 . . i
0 3. )
; ) . •. '>
;) .0
2. 1
3.5
. 5
6.2
'i . 2
•1 .2
1 1 . 6
. /
. ->
2.4
n I.I

-------
           APPENDIX G  (CONTINUED)
00
ID Sttf?
5490
56)0,'l
H245
.3684
3 )OO
7452
16219
18790
1 5570
I68B2
17931
I6H82
1 5 1 56
IB 790
18245
1 36.S4
16128
18790
18790
18790
15570
16219
16381
Iti245
1.3700
16381
17*147
17452
6

3
3
5
4
3
6
3
5
4
4
4
4

5
5
4
6
5
5
5
4
.3
4
5
3
4

6
Port.
ID SOY A<7<>
5492
5681
5781
5242
5166
76.31
331 ?
5481
3 1 0 1
50,-i 1
540 1
5441
4025
5446-
5717
5 1 06
5466
76? .J
3651
5096
5102
7076
5406
308 1
7387
f)5
06
05
53
54
56
59
59
60
63
64
65
66
67
67
6H
68
6H
70
70
77
77
78
8:)
81
5586 2 01
5771 2 01
5597 2 02
9471 2 iI2
5493 2 H3
D 1 onH
Ph 1
14.60
I-/I.52
13.70
1 0. (19
12. 38
8.67
9 . 0 1
9. 1 3
I5.H7
12.93
12. 32
5.43
15.57
7.R4
10. 50
1 1.27
1 1.45
17. -38
9.90
1 1 . 50
1 1.50
12.68
10.45
1 1.99
10.74
19.60
39.50
19.7:)
19.27
3. 2W
PI nod
Ph 2 IICT 1 '
16.10
H.29
14.91
1(1.39
12.43
9.9I
I0.6I
1. 3. 55
15.86
13.79
12.57
3.34
12.64
8.42
15.57
13.61
13.73
17.44
?I.C-t2
13.31
12.58
15.25
18.06
9.27
8.42
17.10
17.70
1 1 . 60
15.69
12.8:1
.4(1
.34
37
47
43
43
41
4>>
47
5"!
45
44
4d
4M
45
44
4.3
47
48
48
43
41
35
45
40
36
35
.34
37
39
\Cf 2 1
4'1
33

47
4?
44
41
49
4.)

\?
43
45
4 1
42

•12
46
43
45


41
47
-1,1

.31
33
37
39
•rink.
:9J I FRP 2 CO 1 CO 2 Cn.(i i'-ilnt

5-

62
5.3
44
53
ny
1 °r>
69
6(-'
.6"
•;y
6/
46
67
65
M4
75
126
0?
46
34
1 :!6
66



1 17


91

r;
73
69
73
1 3
56
0
85
7.3
85
110
0
'.•t
107
65
28



17


.1 .1

1.6 1.9
.1 .1
.2 . 3
. !•
. 1
.2

.2 .2
.1 .1

I.I \."t
.1 .1
.1 .1
.1 .1
.2
.2
.2
.2

.1 .1
.2
. 1



.2

3.ii
0 1 . •)
2.3
2 .7
0 .•'
n 12. 5
1 J. 5
'" 12.5
" . 2
.2
4.6
0 I.I
1. 1
r< I.I
:! . 7
0 .2
I.I
n 4 . 4
0 2.5
C* ; J
0 . /)
. ,1
1 . 6
1 3. 1
0 I.I
2.3
. )
. 2
(I . .)
3. 0

-------
APPENDIX G  (CONTINUED)
Ms Id.
5505
56.15
5/55
3660
7/20
/'J50
V470
5505
55 1 1)
5565
5/30
5(150
54; 5
5 570
5 7/0
5-)4l)
7100
55 1 J
5525
5550
5565
5/60
366-1
54/0
5595
/•j IW
5 4 -t 5
5->5"j
5/05
5 755
1
)tf>
.,
3
}
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
-)
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
•)
3
nff Ic
17, tOU
1 /I 19
13700
16128
14500
1 H2 1 6
17047
1 /i'JM;1
I5.WO
I6511H
1 3700
I65H6
18548
15257
13/011
I 9000
I o/yn
I'.H.W
I40H0
1700,1
I 6500
13/00
16128
U5245
16381
1 879H
15442
I3-W0
1 /I 19
13700
or.'
3

3
6



3
2

3

5
3
3

"3
2
5


3
6
5
4
5

3

3
P^rt.
in r
^V'jOT
S -^(^^
575 /
3662
7722
735 1
94/2
5508
551 2
556 /
5752
535?
549 /
53/1
57/2
5541
7101
551 1
552 S
5551
5566
5761
3661
5471
559 -S
758 1
5^56
5556
57.16
5756
«Y
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
81 nod
AQ P '""h 1
03 1 6 . I H
03 6. 10
03
',14
C'1
(51
04 ,
05 ,=
i'5
t'5
05
05
C'6
19
22
23
23
4.40
2.90
7.4,1
1.91
7. ovi
4.20
3.64
2.70
3.7!i
4.46
/ . I 0
I. 74
I. 27
0.52
0.56
26 14.43
26 10.80
26 6.24
?.(•> '3.67
26 11.66
27 14.68
2H 12.44
28 11.53
28 7.02
29 H.H.3
30 14.77
30 l;).4.-5
31 /.05
Blood
Pli 2 MCT I HOT 2
33.91-1
12^00
1 1 .9'-1
1O.80
I 3. 00
I5.?0
13.36
I 4 . I C1
9.9'5
15.4)1
14.90
13.11
9 . 00
1 1 .H5
10.75
IH.9-1
12.09
11.79
9 . 66
6 . f 19
3.37
14.27
7.07
13.1 3
1 5 . 69
7.72
9.13
7.12
9.6;)
H . 1 6
3ti
3.3

3 H
4'"!
36
37
36
37
36
34
35
33
45
4»
37
4?
41
41
36
30
4!
37
43
39
44
40
39
40
35
41
] )
f5
37
.j )
41
4 1
33
57
36
3 J
31
) j
43
4 5
36
42
44
41
37
4 I

33
42
33
4 5
"i 7
3 i
4.1
'.3
-FP 1

46






72


"•" 5

53 '
66
I ia
45
37
97
34
18
104
9.3
55
39
55
')')
•I 3
.66
59
^ no!:.
FTP 2 cn I CO :» !>rin :^Tlr>t

I24




16

3O


II5

92
26 .9
83
67 .2
25
64
50
73
0
87 .1 .1
62
42
105
122
55
68 . ?
48
3. 2
3.,)
1..-.
.2. 4
. /
1.3
. •)
3. ;
. j
1 '•' . 5
1. 1
. .)
. 2
6. 3
.? . .1
. /
1
. .1
. 2
5. 5
l?.5
12. ->
0 2 . 4
. /
. ^
.?. '
. 5
.). ;
1 1.6
1.6

-------
APPENDIX G  (CONTINUED)
Hsld.
IU SI
5460
4020
5490
5545
57/5
3335
5535
56 HO
56 VO
5/45
55:0 5
94 70
9475
57t;0
5135
5495
7775
5520
5740
56 ^5
57 30
56 3 5
5765
7705
5365
5(350
57ii5
3090
7745
5735
te
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
.3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
.3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Traffic
Co'int
15442
17931
17452
IB245
I3700
1 3300
18245
IB 354
1 B54B
13700
1 7000
17047
IH354
I.37M0
I4'J00
I854B
K5790
1 3 i:-)0
1 3 700
1 7 1 1 9
13700
IB 354
13700
IB424
15257
16586
1.3700
16219
I36H4
13700
DOW

4
6
5
3
3
5

5
3
3


3
5
5
5
2
.3

3

3
4
3

3
3
/I
3
Part.
I!)
5461
402 1
5491
5546
5777
3336
55H7
5682
5691
5746
5506
9473
9476
57B2
5136
5496
7776
552 1
574 1
5696
57.31
5636
5766
7706
5366
5B5 1
5786
.3091
7746
5736
SRX
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Aqp
32
33
33
33
33
.34
34
34
34
35
36
36
36
37
38
38
38
39
39
40
4rt
41
41
42
44
44
45
47
47
49
ninod
Pb 1
1 1 . 50
10.50
10.98
1 1.91

9.27
7 . 28
B.67
7.74
7.7.3
1 0. T)
9.50
7.24
1.27
5.74
'•1.52
1.27
9.66
9.95
0. 29
7.58
9.37
11.27
7.97
7.02
10. 14
16.37
25.41
5.84
6.53
"1 rind
Pb 2
10.64
8.08
9.6.3
6.76

9.18
4.51
7.36
9.13
8.95
R.I 7
9.46
15. 4.6
12.57
13.1 "I
9.82
1 1.91
16.99
14.40
8.37
9.93
10.39
11.61
5.53
7.72
10.54
12.67
14.77
6.02
6.86
MCI' 1
43
38
44
40
40
48
41
39
36
.37
43
42
42
43
41
42
3 P.
43
3M
41
41
42
3;>
41
39
41
46
45
37

'iCT 2
41
37
41
35
43
'50
36
4 1
37
4.)
43
4'-l
43
45
46
41
H
44
.3 )
3>
43
41
45
4?
42
43


37
29
FKP 1
53
80
51
4.3

22
29
31
7,i
|0n
~l'\
79
71
62
92
54
I'M
1 IB
71
8 1
19;
41
95
73
62
45
129
144
79
0
FF.P 2 CO 1
69
1 02
87
0

67 1.6
*7
47 . 1
III .1
99
69
28
36
|4 1.2
45
45
185
25
16
48 . 1
26
73 . 1
74
40
121
50
0
0
45
71
S-no-: .
CO 2 Code i-'iint
1
. 5
.7 1 3 . )
1. 1
.2
1.4 2 . H
2. 3
n I . ;>,
••) 1 . 6
. .-'
1.2
.;-) 'i ..i
. ••'
.2 2. 3
.6 2 2.5
.9 1 .2
. 0
1.4
.'••I
•:! 2.3
1.4
0 . 2
. v)
. -J
••I
. 0
.0
1.4 4 1.4
4.5
. i)

-------
           APPENDIX  G  (CONTINUED)
oo
to
HsH. '1
n sitfi
5 1 30
5240
7720
7340
7.385
4025
54H0
7655
7620
5.)90
5105
5715
3,)h.-)
509 '3
5445
7605
5465
5085
5405
5 1 00
7075
54IO
78 15
/ J90
/ M0
-i 160
5.11-3
7/50
7/85
7640
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
r^f'fr
Count HOW
1 4000
1 3300
14500
16381
16381
7931
7452
3684
3684
8/90
8/90
15156
16219
18/90
168/12
18790
18245
18790
15570
18790
18790
20928
31542
23885
20572
20928
20928
2 1 300
31542
27537
5
3

4
4
4
6
4
4
5
5

3
5
4
5
5
5
4
5
5
4
3
4
4
4
/i
5
3

Pnrt.
5131
5241
7721
7341
7386
4.127
5482
7656
7621
509 1
5li)7
5/16
3082
509 7
5447
7606
5467
5086
5407
5101
7077
5112
7817
7392
7702
5362
5417
7753
7788
7642

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2









Aae
5?
52
53
54
58
60
6/)
60
62
63
63
63
64
64
64
64
65
66
66
71
75
01
01
02
02
0.3
04
04
(.14
05
Pb I
7.97
7.97
5.2I
7.32
7.58
lb.28
12.38
10.32
6. 31
8.37
8.90
6. 3/
9.01
7.49
7.84
14. 5/
19.79
8.90
7.61
1 1.98
8.20
20. 80
9.50
1 7.32
29. 10
15.95
2 1. 60
15.16
7.00
14.60
Rl OT-)
Pb 2 HOT 1 MOT ?
7.48

4.52
7.38
7.12
10.58
11.36
10.83
5.5.3
7.8.1
10.50
2.21
6.68
7.96
9.46
15.5.4
11.94
8.45
11.27
14.28
8.93
17.40
15.10*
17.20
21.20
19.90
21 .60
1.3. "6
11.20
17.50
39
45
35
38
41
43
4.3.
40
44
36
46
43
49
4.3
38
41
38
47
37
41
39
33
34
35

39
37
37
37
37
37
41
36
41
42
41
42
39
45
35

35
45
4 1
38
45
36
46
39


36
33
36
.37
38
1 )
36
3 i
37
FF'> 1 FRP 2 CD 1 cn 2 O-HO ->qlnt
75
53
43
70
92
81
40
43
78
I 05
64
4H
I 79
68
I 00
59
87
62
4R
I22
I 15


59

39

4


132

31
3 .2
26 . (.1
118
107
5tt .7
75
65 .2
0 .1
102
55 . 1
43
81
100
67 .1 .1
98
24
Pi
0


. 1

. 1

20 .1 .1


.,
!/
. 7
1 1.6
0 I.I
1. 1
12.5
2 .>.'
1.1
J . /)
0 .2
. /
0 1. 1
. /'
1. 1
. /
0 I.I
.7
1.6
. "i
. )
. 2
.5
0 1.4
3. 1
•'i . :>
. i
0 1.6
. .1
T. 2

-------
           APPENDIX  G (CONTINUED)
u>
N)
HslH.
ID Site
7795
7,510
3/tW
7545
7415
765(1
7520
7 IU/)
7395
7550
7275
7610
7525
7750
7645
77H5
7>i05
5225
54IH
727M
9165
7 1 70
775.1
7H25
7/CH1
7cH)5
7640
54 1 ,)
5.36U
72/0
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
frafflc
Count DOW
20928
20 I 4 I
37.-)5iJ
3/J50
22670
2vM3H
37^50
2 I 37)0
2.3805
.17;) 50
20432
3/H5H '
37.350
2 1 .300
37S5M
3 1 542
2092R
20-J90
20928
20432
20.362
2048.3
21 30(1
3 1 542
20572
20928
27537
2092B
2092H
20432
4

5
5


5
5
4
5
3
5
5
5
5
3
4
5
4
.3
5
5
5
.3
4
4

4
4
.3
Part.
10 SRX Aq°
7/97
7812
37v) 1
7546
7417
7652
7522
7IH2
7397
7551
7276
761 1
115
"5
65
65
66
67
69
7(1
72
74
75
77
7527 1 93
7752 2 H 1
7647 2 02
77H7 2 H2
7807 2 C"2
5227 2 03
541.3 2 H3
7272 2 0.3
9466 2 05
7171 2 06
775 1 2 1 9
7026 2 19
77.11 2 24
7SM6 2 24
7641 2 25
5411 2 26
5.361 2 28
7271 2 2'.'
FUnrH
Ph I
I I . 8^
IP). M
I I. 79
I 7. I 7
8.6.3
I3.9C1
8.67
1 2. 38
1(1.21
11.74
12.45
14. 1 I
16.22

I4.9k1
1 1.40
.3i1.9',1
15. R«
9.50
11.60
1 1.27
17. 1:1
9.H3
10.52
9.13
4.95
10.90
4.95
1 1.5.3
9.62
Ph 2 HCT 1 MCT 2
9.21
12.4.3
12.88
13.55
8 . 6fl
1 .1 . 1 3
7.23
2.3.67
9.98
1 5 . Pi 1
1 1.66
15.74
16.97

18.30
10.50
5.56

11.50
1 7 . 70
1 1 . (12
2.3.04
1 1 . 32
3.63
i-i.93

11.66
5.56
12.06
10. 14
.36
39
4*
46
4:.?
5.3
4R
42
32
41
47
42
39
.34
.37
.34
.34
.37
4C1
34
.37
.38
43
.39
37
.34
37
39
43
4;i
37
39
4<)
46
4>1
51
47
4 I
33
•11
44
43
4.1
.35
.3-1
35
35
4.)
38
^
.36
33
41
4 )
.37
.35
31)
39
42
41
-I?1 1 1


132
52
38
61
9.3
29
1 «6
59
84
82
\\'-2







1.31
04
5.3
ia
61
4.3
47
83
62
7.3
••RP 2 CO 1 CO 2 Co-iR ^nlnt
47
62 . 1
45 .7
73 . 1
r>9 .1 .2
22 .1 .2
04 . .3
42 .2 .1
173 .2
54 . 1
42 ..3 .4
65 . 1
1(17 .1



1 8



31

5.9
61 .3
122 .7

73 1.3
41 .1
, F> >i • ^
'•'"is . i
2 . 5
n . ?
i: 1.4
fi 2. 1
" 2.7
(i . ii
« . '1
0 . 5
2 1.4
I) 8.7
1 .2
:) .•)
:) .5
1.6
.V
. .)
.•.I
1.6
.2
. vl
. !•)
1. i
1.6
1 3.9
2- l.t>
. •)
2 .3.2
il . 2
2 .9
i1 . -1

-------
          APPENDIX  G (CONTINUED)
U)
to
Hsld. Traffic
in Sit*; Count OOW
7645
7/95
5415
5485
7715
7785
7810
7815
5225
/5<)5
7(i30
/5I5
7685
//35
9465
7665
767!)
Y7«0
76/0
7335
/390
/ 760
7800
/66v)
76iH1
/69H
7790
784;)
7/25
//65
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
37850
20928
20928
20890
2H483
31542
20141
31542
20890
20432
.31542
37850
31542
20432
20362
31542
195/8
31542
31542
31542
23885
2 1 300
20432
31542
19578
21)141
3 1 542
31542
? 1 300
20432
5
4
4
5
5
3

.3
5
3
.3
5
3
3
5
3

3
3
3
4
5
3
3


3
3
5
3
Part.
ID Sex Aoe
7646
7796
5416
5486
7716
7786
7811
7816
5226
7586
7331
7516
7686
7736
9467
7666
7676
7781
7671
7836
7391
7761
7801
7661
7681
7691
779 1
784 1
7726
7766
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
29
29
30
3
3
3
.3
3.
3
3
33
34
34
34
.34
35
37
37
39
4'1
4l
42
42
46
46
48
48
48
49
49
llood
Ph I
7.26
8.55
9.42
6.59

7.74
9.M
\ 1.45
12. 15
6.27
1 8 . .39
10.32
7.07
7.97
10.85
5. 19
1 1.0.3
11.91
6.35
1 1.45
15.22
9.13
5. 13
10.29
9.84
8.44
10.98
8.67
8.67
12.21
Rlood
Ph 2 HOT 1 !
6.50
4.67
10.50
6.34
4.22
8.94
16.99
10.9 >1
10.65
5.83
19.02
10.8-3
8. 37
6.32
1 1.53
7.10
1 1.66
13.19
5. 86
8.90
12.06
12.17
6.10
9.89
11.31
7.I;1
9.32

1 1.66
15.21
43
39
40
40
40
41
41
3R
44
41
40
42
.38
4!-i
42
41
38
30
41
41
43
38
41
45
44
32
4-')
40
4P!
37
Sn
ICT 2 F'EP 1 FSP 2 CO 1 CO 2 (
4-1
37
39
4 I
4?
43
38
37
41
4.1
.37
39
36
43
41
13
35
4.3
4;)
33
42
37
38
45
4'1
3;i
36
42
41
33
6fi
66
1 f'9
57

55
81
60
63
65
57
70
73
86
1 15
55
77
18
68
0
75
59
.84
74
62
137
57
4.3
57
93
7(1
IH7
66
70 . 1
79
48
79 .6
81 .2
87 .6 I.I
47
66 .2
72 l.t<
52
64 .2
39
83
69
109 .2
24
88
61 .1
76 .5
1 12
79
74
58
115

87
64 .,1
:rHn i'nlnt
.9
?.5
. '••'
0 1.4
. .)
. •>
2 .2
0 .0
4 1.6
. "3
1 .2
1 . /
. .)
4 .,)
• '*'
. 5
. . i
•:i .2
. •.)
. i;i
M 1 . 4
0 .-J
. il
.2
. 5
• "
. 'l
. >1
.2
1 .:-)

-------
                                                                                                                                  I'.
           APPENDIX  G  (CONTINUED)
Us Id.
liJ Si
52.1*1
722H
7650
7H-J5
/225
'1* 1 5
/52v)
7 3V 5
7 55'"
761;)
7 1 
-------
                         APPENDIX H

       Fi.ngerpri.ck samples 1 and 2. for each participant are given

in Appendix H.  The  units are explained below.

       Participant ID

       Fingerprick 1        Lead concentration in fingerprick
                            sample 1 ([_ig/100 ml)

       Fingerprick 2        Lead concentration in fingerprick
                            sample 2 (Hg/100 ml)
                                325

-------
APPENDIX .W


P^rticioant  ID     Fimerorl ck I       r irnrirV-
                         10.90
     '•4 '52                16.00
                         13.70
                         19.60
                         ii. 10
                         10.40
     0107                5.4
     Ml-12               14.1
      0\ s —i
      167               13.90
     /•• i x r-i
     •/1168               15.10
                        I2-1^
                        8.10
                        19-70               |~/;yf,
                         5.40              ?-).UV
                                             .
                        19.60              pp 5,,
                                           ^ •<•_)«•'
                         B.10              ,7 ?n
                                           ' ' • - ' '
                                            9. D0
    2                  ^98:^
    "                   :r
                         -'1              V..5H
    54                    •««              17.40

    b417                2?*60              !!-^
    w*                il:^                -f:
    -")4c;^                 «  :>«.                   '
    r- , ,,-,                 O . id 0              I 5 V-< *
    D497                17  I i              1^.^
    5'^'7                Mr,               -;-'^
                       16.10                   ,
                   326

-------
APPENDIX H  (CONTINUED)
P^rticioant  ID
     5 5 5 7
     556V
     55^,6
     5597
     5606
     5662
     5667
     57'i!
     5732
     5/57
     5771
     5776
     5781
     71 71
     7272
     7291
     7392
     7642
     7647
     7702
     7722
     7737
     7788
     7797
     7807
     78 1 2
     7817
     7851
     9131
     922!
     9^32
     9292
     9293
     9297
     9303
     9^72
     9382
     9392
     Q'72
     9-'-9 2
     9493
     9194
     9 -96
 5.4 
-------
                          APPENDIX I

       The paint lead concentrations,  distance from street, and

composition of each household are given in Appendix I .   The

abbreviated captions and units are explained below.
Hsld. ID
Site
Inside  1st & 2nd

Outside 1st & 2nd

Dist 1

Dist 2

Composition
Household ID
Traffic density site
Lead concentrations in paint from, two places
inside the house (mg/cm^)
Lead concentrations in paint from two places
                         o
outside the house (mg/cm )
Distance from the street to the front of
the house (ft)
Distance from the street to back of the
house (ft)
Composition of the house, cross street,  speed limit
                      BK
                      WD
                      ST
                      ASB.SHGL.
                      AL. SHGL.
                      AL. SIDING
                      METAL SHGL.
                      WD.SHGL.
                 Brick
                 Wood
                 Stucco
                 Asbestos shingle
                 Aluminum shingle
                 Aluminum siding
                 Metal shingle
                 Wood shingle
                                328

-------
APPENDIX I
Hsld. Inside In<;ld» Outside Outside
ID Site 1 st 2 nd 1 st 2 nd Dlst 1 nist 2
0005
0010
0015
0025
0*450
H355
0060
0065
0073
0075
0^J80
0^90
0100
0105
0120
0130
0135
0140
0145
0153
0155
0163
0165
0170
0183
0250
0255
0263
0265
0270
0275
1395
1400
1405
1410
1415
1420
1425
1515
1520
.2
.2
.3
.0
.0
.0
.0
.5
.0
4.3
.3
.3
.0
.0
.0
.2
.0
.7
.7
.2
.0
.0
.7
.0
.2
.0
.3
1. 1
.0
.0
.0
.3
1.7
.0
.7
.0
.0
.0
.0
.3
.0
.0
.0
I.I
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.0
.0
.0
.3
.0
.2
.5
.0
.2
.7
.7
.2
.2
.5
.0
.0
.2
.2
.0
.0
2.5
.0
.5
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.9

1


1



12





1




1

2

1
2

10


1
3
1

2


1

3

.7
.4
.9
.0
.4
.0
.0
.0
.5
.0
.0
.0
.5
.0
.4
.7
.7
.7
.0

.0
.7
.9
.1
.7
.0
. 1
.9
.2
. 1
.0
.3
.9
.3
.0
.0
.6
.2
.2
.7
4.

,

1.


^
a.
2.

.


.

„
,
i.

i!
2.
.
.

.
1.


2.

2.
.
I .
1 .
.


1 .

5

0

1


0
6
1

0


7

3
9
1
0
6
3
5
5

0
4


1

7
0
6
5
0


6

40
42
38
79
53
51
43
1 16
82
80
68
73
70
69
90
44
44
44
43
42
47
42
62
64
42
77
85
63
52
54
64
46
63
48
46
49
46
47
47
51
66
74
69
1 19
86
85
1 19
178
1 15
1 13
94
88
98
98
183
66
32
74
77
86
3:4
73
85
9fl
71
10.3
128
100
73
86
103
69
86
74
69
7S
71
75
81
81
Composition
wn*w
BK.
BK. iwn.
BK.
BK.
BK.
BK.
BK
ST.
ST.

BK
BK
BK
BK.
BKSWO.
T^.WD.
RKKWn
/iD^> RK
3 ^
BK&wn
8K*WD.
TK&iVH
BK
8KSWD
BK
BK
iVO.
BK.
BK
BK
'.•(O.ABK.
1KS.HD
BK&WD.
8K*WD
8KS.W")
BK.
TKAifl.
.VD&BK
SKKWD.
                                   329

-------
APPENDIX I (CONTINUED)
Hsld. Inside Inside Outside O'jtsHe
ID Site 1 st 2 nd 1 st 2 nd Dlst 1 Hist 2
1530
1535
1540
1553
1560
1565
1843
1345
1850
1855
I860
1873
1875
189^
1895
I9v>0
1905
1915
1925
2145
2160
2165
2173
2175
2200
2205
2410
2440
2463
2465
2470
2480
2485
2490
2500
2505
.2
.3
.0
.2
.5
.0
.0
.5
.5
.0
.2
.5
.0
.9
.2
.2
.0
.0 --•
.5
.0
.0
.0
.3
.0
.5
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.3
3105 2 .0
3115 2 .9
-3210 2 .0
3220 2 .0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.a
.0
.0
.2
.0
.0
.2
.2
.2
.2
.7
.0
.0
.7
,2
.0
.0
.0
.0
2.1
.0
.5
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.1
.2
.0
2.1
.5
.0
.9

.7
1.4
.0
1 .4
.2
1.4
.0
2.5
2.7
.9
.0
.0
1.1
.0
.5
.0
.0
2.5
3.0
3.0
.9
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0


.5
.0
.0

.7
.5
.0

.0

.5

.2
1 . t
.2
2.5
3.0

.2
.0


.7
.3
.0
4.4
.0
6.5
.5
.0

.0
.0



.0
.0


1.4
.0
38
47
45
4.3
44
43
40
45
45
47
5">
48
45
44
44
53,
64
44
40
S3
6(5
69
65
57
52
73
75
83
62
48
57
71
59
53
75
60
87
45
43
48
71
72
73
63
68
71
75
75
76
76
76
72
67
76
67
71
87
69
68
I 17
96
1 14
85
89
73
1 17
148
126
95
1 19
87
107
92
89
1 14
103
1 14
34
63
83
Comnosl tlon
RK*WD.
rtO
BKXWD
BKAWD.
WD1BK
^K&wn
Rtr*WD
,yn&RK
WD*8K
3K&WO
.KQ*RK. '
3KKWO
rtnXRK
r*v:*WD
s»c*wn
3K
3KSWD
BK&IVD.
3<
BKKWn
BK
3K.
BK&WD.
BK
BK
3K&WD.
F)K
BK
WD*BK.
3KRWD.
rfD
RK
BK&WT)
HD.
ST.
BK.
BK.
RK
RWWD-.35MPH
R>C-35MPH
                                       330

-------
APPENDIX I (CONTINUED)
 Hsld.        Inslrie   Inside 0-.
    ID Site     1  st     2  rrf
:«lri<>  Outside
 !  st     2  nd  Dist  1  Hist 2
3225
3230
3425
3435
3665
367(9
3675
3695
3870
3875
3903
3905
5383
5390
5395
5575
5593
5645
5663
5665
5670
5675
5685
5703
5725
7100
7185
7265
7290
7583
7605
9013
9015
9023
9,470
9075
909(3
9095
9100
9105
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
.5
.2
.2
.0
.3
.0
.0
.0
.5
.3
.3
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.5?
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.2
.2
.0
.0
.0
.2
.3
.3
.0
.0
.9
.a
.d
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.a
.2
.3
.3
.2
.0
.0
.3
.0
.5
.3
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.3
.0
.0
.0
.0
.4
.0
.2
.0
.7
.7
.2
.0
.0
. J
.0
.0
.0
.0
.7
.0
.2
.0
.7

J.4
2.1
4.7
.0
2.7
1.3
.0
.0
.0
1 . 1
3.9
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
I.I
.0
.0
.2
1.4
2.5
.0
2.5

.5
.7
.2
1.8

.0
.0
2.3
.0


.0
1 .8



.0
.7


.5

.0
.5



.0
.5

.0


.0

3.0
.0
.0



.3




1. 1
2.5
.0
43
53
39
51
60
62
60
59
85
J20
41
42
103
64
93
42
21
42
45
52
38
55
53
23
15
83
84
43
63
55
46
59
68
63
39
38
40
39
42
32
66
70
62
82
91
100
89
89
\2"i
175
96
97
130
95
1 19
76
8T
8H
81
92
125
91
91
67
97
128
122
65
96
1 12
74
87
97
98
54
69
79
6?
65
65
RKKWH.-35VPH
'/Wr.-35>'PH,
rtn&RK.
BIT
RK.
BK.
8K8.WO
ST..
RK&WD
RK.
RK.
BK.
RK.
RK*WD.
Rf
RTKWD.-35MPH.
SK-HILLCPf-ST
Rl«'^wn.-35"PH
Rr*WD-35VPH
RK.*ST.*WD.
RK-HILLCPEST
RKKWD.-35MPH
R<
BK-FHDGUSON
BK-PPFSTON
RK
BKXWD.
BK
BK.
BK
RK
BK
BK
RKAWD
RK
RK.
RK.
BK.
RK*WD.
RK*WD.
                                            331

-------
APPENDIX!  (CONTINUED)
Hsld.
ID
91 15
9125
9130
9195
9205
9210
9215
9220
9225
9230
9235
92d0
9285
9290
9295
9300
93k)5
93M
9315
9325
9340
9345
9360
9365
9370
9380
939J
9435
9490
3030
3090
3100
3310
3335
3650
3660
4023
4025
5083
5085
InsHe Inside 0;
Site
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1 st
.0
.3
.0
.0
.0
.9
.0

.0
.0
.0
.0
.5
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.2
.2
.5
.0
.0
.0
.2
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.3
.0
.a
.0
.2
.0
.2
.5
2 nd
.0
.5
1.6
.0
.9
1 . 1
.0

.0
3.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
2.6
.0
.2
8.3
.2
.0
.9
.0
.0
.0
.0
.2
1.8
.2
.0
3. 1
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
2.4
.0
.0
.0
.2
Jtslde Outside
I




2



2
3
5
3

1




1
1
3
2




3



1

9

2


1


st
.2
.7
.0
.0
.5
.0
.0
.0
.7
.5
.7
.8
.6
.4
.2
.0
.0
.0
.6
.4
.9
.3
.0
.0
.0
.0
.8
.0


.4
.0
.5
.0
.5
.0
.5
.1
.0
.7
2 nd Dist 1 Dlst 2
1.1


2.5
.0
.4

3.9
6.2

.0
.0
.0
1. 1
.9
.0
.0
.0
.0
1.6
5.6
1 . 1


6.9
.2
2.7
.0
2. 1


.2
.0
.0



.5
.0

42
39
31
43
41
44
73
57
57
60
60
54
32
60
60
60
50
50
50
45
44
57
17
83
42
60
33
53
40
70
66
67
46
46
53
62
36
36
40
45
77
73
65
74
7*
73
1 1 !
85
91
103
|f)4
35
73
90
84
86
33
91
83
78
65
87
57
124
94
84
66
95
69
100
93
103
67
74
84
91
64
64
100
108
Compost t Ion
BKSWD
Bf.
R < & WD .
RK.
ID.— 35'^PH.
WO-35«PH







rfOOD*AL.SIDINO-35MPH.
RK&wn
WD.
RK
RKKWD.
WO.-35MPH
WD.— 35MPH
RKRWD.
rtD.— 35MPH
WD.— 35''PH
BK.-35MPH
WD^AL.SHGL— J
R<-35Ut>H
WD-35MPH.
WD.-35MPH
WD.— 35'fPH
ifD.-35>
-------
APPENDIX I (CONTINUED)
Hsld.
ID Site
5J93
5395
51013
5105
5130
5135
5165
5249
5365
5373
5403
5405
5440
5445
5455
5463
5465
5473
5483
5493
5495
5505
5510
5523
5525
5543
5545
5550
5555
5565
5585
5595
5635
5625
5635
5680
5690
5695
5705
5715
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Inside Insldf? Outside Outside
1 st 2 nd 1 st 2 nd Dlst 1 ni,t 2
.0
.0
.0

.0
.0
.0
.0
,ij
.0
.0
.0
.3
.0
.5
.2
I.I
.2
•5 ^
.3
.0
.3
.0
.0
.2
.0
.3
.0
.9
12.5
.0
.2
.0
8.0
.2
.0
.0
.3
.3
.0
.a
.a
.0

.0
.0
.0
.0
.2
.0
.0
.0
.0

.0
.5
.0
.0
.0
.a
.2
.0
.0
.3
.0
.7
.0
5.3
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
2.5
.0
.0
.0
2.3
.a
.0





2



6
3
1

1

1



2

1

I


1

2

2




1
1

1

.0
.0
.0
.2
.9
.5
.0
.7
.0
.3
.6
. 1
.7
. 1
.0
.8
.0
.0
.0
.7
.0
.1
.0
.4

.a
.1
.0
.4
.0
.1
.0
.5
.3
.0
.8
.6

.6
.7
.0
.0
.3

.9
.0


.0
1 .5
4.6
1.6
I.I
.0

.0


12.5
3.3
.0
3.2

.0


.9
.9


2.3

3.8
3.0
.3
) . 1


1.6
.7
46
43
46
47
35
44
40
45
49
49
60
62
93
84
58
44
39
34
82
150
35
25
30
25
45
16
50
47
25
21
38
41
58
12
56
23
61
65

26
96
89
87
79
73
77
65
7'?
78
79
83
91
132
1 30
1 16
84
84
64
105
233
94
73
57
73
78
56
10'*
83
71
71
1 11
68
138
57
94
89
8'1
185

62
Con on i It Inn
RK
RK
RK
BK
RK
RK
RK 35«PH
RK.— 3"5MPM.
RKKWn.
dD.

RKKWD
RK.
rfD.
RK.
RK.
Rf. 3C5'
-------
APPENDIX I (CONTINUED)
Hsld.
Inside Insidfi Outside Outside
ID Site
5733
5735
5743
5745
5755
5763
5765
5773
5775
5783
5785
5850
7375
7343
7385
7623
7633
7655
7705
7723
7745
7775
7853
9473
9475
3703
5225
5233
5363
5413
5415
5485
7173
7183
7223
7225
7270
7275
7393
7395
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1 st
1.4
.0
.3
.3
.0
12.5
.0
.0
.3
.3
.3
.0
.3
.5
.0
2.1
.3
.3
.3

1.6
.3
.2
.3
.3
.0
1.6
.3
.3
.3
.3
.3
.3
.2
.0
.0
.0
.0
.3
.0
2 nd
.3
.0
• H
.0
.2
.0
.0
.0
.2
.2
.0
.0
.0
.3
.3
4.4
.0
.3
.3

.i)
.3
.y
.0
.0
.<3
.0
.0
.3
.0
.0
.5
.2
.5
.0
.0
.0
.2
1.4
.0
1 St
.2
.3
.0
.0
1.6
4.1

.3
.3
.7
.0
.3
.0
1.6
.9
1.6
12.5
.3
.0
.3
4.6
.0
1.3

.0
1.4
.0
.3
.9
.2
.0
.9
1.8
.5
.7
.0
.0
.0
I.I
1.4
2 nd Dlst 1 Dtst 2


.0
.3
.0



.0
2.3
.0
.3
.0
.2
1. 1
2.3
12.5
.9

.7
.0

.9

.3
.5
.3
.0
.0
.0

1.4
.3
.5
1.6
.0



.0
66
71
49
72
50
91
22
15
33
63
73
68
50
47
43
73
45
73
1 15
45
49
54
83
48
61
82
56
69
47
49
53
80
1 13
47
57
57
63
53
47
44
131
Iflfl
133
132
ai
135
84
74
76
92
1(14
I03
131
88
66
1.34
72
1 15
167
92
95
123
125
1 0H
1 32
I3S
9>^
1 18
84
76
79
1 18
158
73
99
104
93
85
69
67
Cnnnosl tion.
BK
BK
RK
BK





RK&wn-BELT LINE
ST.
RK.
RK RH.r f-INE
RK.-RELT LINE
RKKrfD.
RKXASR. SHGL
3K.
BK
wo.
RK&WD.
RK
WD.-
RK
BK
wn.
qr-CCHAR CREST
















RK»,',VD. E. MOCKINGBIRD
.vn&^SR. SHGL
RK. PRESTON


RK.-WPRBS CHAPEL
RK.
rtD— 4CH1PH
BKKiVn-40MPH
HD.
BK1WD.
RKAASR.SHGL
BK*rtD. 4PMPH
VSB.SHGI.-35MPH
RKAHH.— 35VPH
BK
BK
BK
BK
A SB. SHGL
WD.







^







                                     334

-------
APPENDIX I (CONTINUED)
Hsld. Inside Inside Outside OutsHe
ID Site 1 st 2 nd I st 2 nd Rlst 1 Dlst 2
7415
7515
7523
7525
7545
7553
7585
761 i)
7643
7545
7650
7660
7665
7673
7675
7683
7685
7690
7700
7715
7725
7735
7750
7760
7765
7780
7785
7790
7795
7300
7805
7813
7315
7320
7325
73313
7335
7840
7845
9465
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
.0
.2
.0
.5
.0
.9
.0
.0
.0
.5
.0
.0
.5
.0
.0
.5
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0 -~
.0
.0
.0
.0
.2

.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.2
.9
.5
.0
.3
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.2
.0
.0
.5
.0
.0

.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.5
.0
.0
.2
.0
.0
.2
.0
2.7
.0
.0
.0
1.4
3.2
.5
.2
3.2
.9
.0
.0
.0
.0

.2
.0

3.0
.0
.0
.0
I.I
.5
.0

.0

1.4
.0
.0
.2
.0
7.5
.9


.0
.5
.0
2.3
.7
.0
.2
2.1
8.7
.2
.9
.2
.5
.0
.2



.5


2.3



J.6
.0




2.5
.0




3.9




.0
77
57
67
60
81
63
55
122
45
152
107
32
35
35
25
24
33
35
45
33
31
51
35
34
44
33
34
34
41
43
33
59
30
31
35
47
34
30
41
55
1 15
141
93
1 13
1 15
1 14
86
162
37
175
1 32
75
76
67
95)
95
. 95
1 IM
30
1 15
1 1 1
75
74
37
93
74
93
87
35
37
69
' 33
84
82
85
74
9v5
79
85
125
Composition
Rv*WD.
T'&wn.
3WWD.
RKKWT.
RK
RK
Rlf
WO&RK
ASB.KD SHGL
rt'D&RK
>VD.
RK-COIT RD
3K.
RK.
3 K. -A R PA. MS
RK. -ARRAYS
BK-COIT PD
BK PPESTON TO
SK.
RT-MADSH
BK.->'\RSH
RV-w*LNUT
Rfft WD.-WA.BSH 35MPH
wn&RKT-MAPSH-aSf-'PH
RK WALNUT
Rf.-COIT PD
RkT.-COIT PD
Rf COPNEP HOUSE-COIT
ST*WD
.vnitJK-WALNUT
ASR.SHGL
R>C.-PPI=STON
B^-COIT
RK-COIT
RK&wn.
T'-COIT
RK.-HILLCPEST
RK.
RK- WALNUT
RK.40MDH-FOPCST LN.
                                  335

-------
          .APPENDIX  J
Report to Southwest Research Institute by
  Geoderma Consultants  - Dallas, Texas
                    336

-------
STUDY OF SELECTED SOIL CHARACTERISTICS IN

DALLAS COUNTY/ARLINGTON AREA IN RELATION TO

THE RETENTION, RELEASE AND TRANSMISSION OF

         AUTOMOBILE EXHAUST LEAD
REPORT TO SOUTHWESTERN RESEARCH INSTITUTE
                   by

          Geoderma Consultants
            4810 Cole Avenue
           Dallas, Texas 75205
            October 26, 1976
                 337

-------
                          Abstract






     A study was performed to examine soil characteristics




which have the potential to affect lead adsorption, reten-




tion and release from top-soils in the Dallas/Arlington




metroplex area.




     In particular, texture, clay mineralogy, organic  con-




tent, and soil pH were studied.  The majority of soils were




high in clay content and organic matter and had high poten-




tial for adsorption and storage of automobile exhaust  if




it were deposited on the soil surface and allowed to infil




trate into the top soil.  Soil chemistry is such that  rela-




tively insoluble precipitates are likely to be favored.




     The slowly  permeable native of the clay soils might




reduce the amount of lead infiltrating into the soil and




allow it to be removed by runoff.




     Introduction of exotic sand has modified the texture




of 10 to 20% of  the soils checked by laboratory procedures




and would reduce lead retention in such soils.
                           338

-------
                           Table of Contents

                                                       Page
Title Page	      i

Abstract  ...........     ii

Table of Contents	iii

  I.   Introduction    ........      1

 II.   Method	      2

III.   Results	      3

      a)  S.C.S. Classifications of Soil Textures .      3

      b)  Laboratory Analysis Check on Grain Size .      5

      c)  Clay Mineralogy of Selected Soil Samples.      5

      d)  Organic Content of Soils	      7

      e)  The pH of Soil Samples	      8

 IV.   Conclusions .........      9

  V.   List of Tables	     11

      Table 1.  Master List of Soil Conservation
        Service Texture Classification.    ...     11

      Table 2.  Classification of Top-Soils Accord-
        ing to the S.C.S. Soil Texture Classes.    .     23

      Table 3.  Laboratory Analysis of 50 Soils
        for Grain Size, pH, Organic Content and
        Clay Mineralogy(10 Samples)  ....     24

      Table 4.  Summary of the Percentage of
        Organic Matters in Soils of the Laboratory
        Analyzed Sub-Samples  ...    ...     28

 VI.   References	    ...     29
                                 339

-------
I.    Introduction




     A study to examine levels of lead in the blood of




Dallas/Arlington metroplex residents was conducted under




the auspices of the Southwest Research Institute and fund-




ed by the Environmental Protection Agency.  It was hypo-




thesized that top-soils in yards might be a source of lead




absorbed into the blood of the local residents.  The ori-




gin of the lead was thought to be automobile exhaust.




     A supplementary study was conducted contemporaneous-




ly with the examination of lead levels in residents' blood




and in yard top-soils.  The study examined the soil compo-




nents which would affect the retention and release of lead




from the soil and soil characteristics which might deter-




mine potential routes for lead ingestion into the human




bloodstream.




     Soil components known to interact with atmospherically




derived lead are clay minerals and a variety of chelating




and complexing compounds.  Soil chemistry, in particular




pH and the availability of anion groups such as C0§, SO^




and phosphates, is important in the formation of lead com-




pounds of varying solubility and in affecting the fixation




of 1ead in soil.




     Other characteristics such as texture, amount of hu-




mus material and permeability are important in determining




the leaching environment, and the susceptibility of top-





                          340

-------
soil to erosive forces which  remove  and  transport  lead




contaminated particles.




     The supplementary study,  designed to  provide  back-




ground information to aid  in  the  interpretation  of the




lead analyses, was confined to  top-soil  environments,  0-6




inches, in residential yards.   Samples were  collected  by




staff of the Southwest Research  Institute.




     Each sample was classified  according  to  grain-size




distribution (texture) and a  large sub-sample  was  random-




ly chosen for more detailed laboratory analyses  of tex-




ture. pH, clay mineralogy  and  total  organic  matter.






II.  Method




     Soil Conservation Service  (S.C.S.)  mapping  of soils




in Dallas County and Arlington  is available  on 1:20,000




scale aerial photographs.  The  location  of each  sample




site was examined and the  soil  texture described in the




S.C.S.  soil series descriptions,  noted for the upper six




inches .




     A randomly chosen sample  of  50  soils were examined




by laboratory procedures to ascertain the reliability  of




the S.C.S.  classification  and  mapping.




     The same 50 samples were  later  analyzed  for pH and




total organic content.  The three major  soil  textural




classifications found in the  Dal 1 as/Ar1ington  area were





                           341

-------
analyzed for clay mineral species using x-ray diffraction




methodology;  a total of ten soils were thus examined.




     Additional information on soil chemistry was taken




from the S.C.S. soil series descriptions and available




chemical data and used as an aid to interpret the soils




as potential sources and sinks of environmental lead.






III. Results




     a)  S.C.S. classification of soil textures (Table 1)




         More than 50% of the soil samples had a clayey




(C) texture (see tables 1 and 2).  For these soils clay




size particles constitute greater than 40% of the inor-




ganic content.  Clay size particles are the principle ad-




sorbers of divalent lead (Pb~) and retain lead longer than




other inorganics.  The clay textured soils have the great-




est potential for lead storage.




         Greater than 33% of the samples have a silty clay




(Sic)  texture-  These soils also have greater than 40%




clay size particles and a similar high potential to retain




le.ad as the clayey soils.




         Clay loam (CL)and sandy clay loams (SCL), greater




27% and 20% clay respectively, have sufficient clay to make




them significant storers of lead but constitute such a small




part of the total sample as to be insignificant.




         Sandy loams (SL) have less than 20% clay and are






                          342

-------
 capable  of  adsorbing  far  less  lead on the mineral surfaces




 than  the  clayier  counterparts.




*         The majority of  the  soils have textures and min-




 eralogy  which make  them slowly  permeable to  rain-water or




 artificial  sprinkling.  Lead  deposited in the  upper hori-




 zons  would, after  initial  wetting  of the soil,  be subjected




 to  a  slow downward  flow of water  through miniscule  capil




 lary  spaces and along adsorbed  layers coating  the clay min-




 eral  surface.  Downward transportation of lead  would be




 minimized compared  to the  coarser  textured loamy sands or




 sandy loams.  Indeed  ca    ions  which are usually more  solu-




 ble and  transportable than Pb   ions are often  incompletely




 removed  from the  top-soils of  the  clays  and  silty clays.




         However,  the surface  water runoff from the soils




 is  greater  than for the coarser textured soils  and  if  auto-




 mobile lead were  confined  by  fall-out to the very upper




 part  of  the topsoil surface it  might be  largely washed a-




 way across  the soil surface during heavy thunderstorms on




 even  gentle (>1%)  slopes.




         The clayey and silty  clay soils have  a certain




 degree of cohesiveness when dry and are  less susceptible




 to  wind  erosion than  the  loamier  or fine sandy  soils.  How-




 ever,  transportation  into  houses  by wet  clay adhering  to




 boots  and shoes is  obvious.





                           343

-------
     b)  Laboratory analysis check on grain size




         Fifty of the samples were checked for  grain  size




by laboratory procedures.  Twenty percent had coarser,




sandier textures than allowed by the S.C.S. mapping units




and classification (Table 3).




         Two possible reasons exist for this discrepancy.




Soils of limited areal extent can either be overlooked




during field mapping or be too small to include as separ-




ate map units.  Alternatively, the soil texture could have




been altered by the addition of exotic sands for purposes




of improving soil drainage or yard fertility, or during




cons truction.




         The practice of adding fluvial sands to clayey




or silty clay soils is common on the Blackland  Prairie




areas of Dallas County and other parts of North Central




Texas.  That it occurred for 20% of the subsample serves




as a warning that a considerable part of the total sample




probably has been modified by sands brought into the  gar-




den.  This may be significant when interpreting the impor-




tance of on-site adsorption of lead by soil minerals.






     c)  Clay mineralogy of selected soil samples




         Ten subsamples representing the 3 major soil tex-




ture classes were analyzed for clay mineralogy  (Table 3).




The clay fraction was divided into coarse  (2p to 0.2p) and





                          344

-------
medium to fine  (<0.2y)  sizes.




         The clay textured  soils  showed  no  significant




difference between coarse and medium  size  fractions.  Mont-




morillonite  (>40%) was  dominant,  kaolinite  present  in




smaller quantities (10-20%).  Montmorillonite  has  a high




cation exchange capacity  (CEC 80  to 120  me.) and a  great




potential to adsorb and retain  lead.   Kaolinite  (CEC  10




to 20 me.) has  a lesser potential  to  retain  lead.   Thus




the clayey montmori1lonite  soils  that  formed over  the




Austin Chalk and Eagle  Ford Shales could be  significant




sinks for atmospheric derived lead.   Especially if  acting




in conjunction with high  amounts  of soil organics.




         The clay mineralogy of the silty clay textured




soils changes from coarse to medium clays.   In the  coarser




clays, degraded mica  (illite?) predominates  (>40%)  with




kaolinite and montmori1lonite in  lesser  quantities  (10-




20%).  The degraded mica  has a high cation  exchange capa-




city and could be a good  potential storer of lead.  In the




finer clay fraction montmori11onite is the  dominant clay




(>40%) and consequently the potential  for storing  lead on




the many small  clay surfaces is high.




         The sandy loam textured  soils are predominantly




kaolinite (>40%) in the coarser fractions, with degraded




mica and mixed mica/montmori1lonite interlayered clays




subordinate.  Kaolinite,  as previously noted has a  lesser




                          345

-------
potential for adsorbing lead.  In the finer textured  clays




kaolinite gives way to mixed layered clays and these.mica/




montmori1lonite interlayered minerals have a high cation




exchange capacity and potential to adsorb lead.  However,




the smaller total clay amount in sandy loam must be con-




s idered.




         The predominant adsorbed cation is ca + in most




of the soils derived from the Cretacious formations.




Bittel and Miller (1974) measured the exchange of Pb2 +




against Ca   on montmori1lonite , illite and kaolinite.




In these experiments Pb2 + was preferentially adsorbed, re-




sulting in selectivity coefficients of about 2-3.






     d)  Organic content of soils




         The great majority of soils (80%) had organic




contents between 6 and 15% dry weight (Table 4).  Sixty




percent of soils had organic contents greater than 9%.




These soils have moderately high to high organic amounts.




Various organically derived compounds and organo-clay com-




plexes are the major retainers of lead along with clay in




the soil.  Although the analyses was not designed to  anal-




yze for chelates and complexing agents, it is a reasonable




assumption that soils with high percentages of organics




anc clays have a good probability of forming such deri-




vatives.  Certainly clay soils with organic matter >9%
                           346

-------
 have much  greater  potential to adsorb and retain  environ-




 mental  lead  than the  sandier or loamier textured  soil with




 low organic  contents  such  as samples #9100 and #9345.






      e)  The pH of soil  samples




         The great majority of the laboratory analyzed sub-




 samples had pHs between  7.0 and 8.0.  This is within the




 neutral to moderately alkali range that  is expected of top-




 soils derived  from calcium carbonate rich parent material.




 Apparently yard practices,  including addition of fertili-




 zers  and organic matter  (?)  have  not substantially changed




 surface soi1 pHs.




         Relatively little is  presently  known about lead




 chemistry in soils.   Gasoline  combustion being the main




 source of lead most of the lead will be  deposited as  solu-




 ble halides, lead  Chlorobromide,  Pb  CLBr.   Singer and Han-




 son  (1969)  described  how excess lead is  probably  decreased




 after deposition on the  soil due  to  the  formation of  rela-




 tively insoluble compounds  with carbonates,  phosphates and




 sulfates.   The clayey  and  silty clay soils  derived from




 the Austin Chalk and  Eagle  Ford Shales are  high  in both




 carbonate and  sulfate  ions.  At neutral  to  moderately




 alkaline pHs the formation  of  the  lead carbonate  and  lead




 sulfates would be  favored    At  very  high  pHs  the  lead would




be partially released  from  these  compounds.   At  very  low
                           347

-------
pHs lead would be desorbed from the clay-mineral surfaces.




However, the large reservoirs of ca   ions in the soils,




especially on the clay surfaces acts as a buffer against




extremes of pH and favors stabilization and retention of




the lead against leaching and root absorption.  The low




hydraulic conductivity (K factor) of the clay and silty-




clay soils would further reduce the leaching of the lead




compound precipitates.






IV.  Conclusions




     Soil characteristics in the study area appear to be




favorable for the retention of lead and lead compounds




within the soil system.  In particular high quantities of




negatively charged clay mineral surfaces for adsorption




of Pb^+, high organic contents to form complexing and




chelating agents,and an ample supply of sulfates and car-




bonates at favorable pHs so that insoluble lead compounds




can form.  In addition soil permeability is  low due to




the swelling clays in the profile,and the climatic char-




acteristics of heavy rainfalls with associated high water




losses in surface runoff do not favor leaching.  The latter




factor might be important in reducing the initial infil-




tration of automobile lead into the soil due to losses in




surface runoff, or preferential movement of water through




dessication cracks to depth within the profile.
                            348

-------
     As high as 20% of the sub-sampled soils had coarser




textures than would be expected from S.C.S. mapping and




classification.  This is thought to be due to the practice




of mixing fluvial  sands with clayey soils to produce more




favorable textures for plant growth.   The sand would have




lesser capability  to retain lead within the soil system.




The problem of the exotic sands being contaminated with




lead from non-automobi1e exhaust sources has not been




studied and is unknown at this time.
                          349

-------
Table 1.   Master List of Soil  Samples  with Soil Conserva-
          tion Service Texture Classification
Sample #
2485
2490
0005
0010
1840
1880
1890
1895
1900
1905
1925
0050
0120
1505
1515
1520
1530
1535
1540
1550
1560
1565
2160
2165
2170
2175
2180
2200
2205
Traffic Density
474
474
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
320
558
537
571
571
571
571
571
571
571
571
571
178
178
178
178
471
471
471
Texture
C
Sic
C
C
Sic
Sic
Sic
Sic
C
C
Sic
Sic
C
C
C
C
C
C
Sic
C
C
C
Sic
Sic
Sic
Sic
Sic
Sic
Sic
                           350

-------
Sample
0130
0135
0170
0270
2440
2460
2465
2470
2475
2480
2410
2500
2505
2145
0025
0090
1860
1870
1875
1915
0015
1845
1850
1855
1395
1405
1410
0250
1400
0140
0145
Traffic Density
346
346
346
346
259
259
259
300
300
300
479
364
364
336
599
599
335
335
335
335
194
194
194
194
155
155
155
472
202
336
336
Texture
Sic
C
C
n
\_
c
Sic
Sic
Sic
C
C
Sic
C
C
Sic
Sic
C
Sic
Sic
Sic
Sic
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
351

-------
Sample
0150
0155
0160
0165
0180
1415
1425
1420
0060
0065
0070
0275
0255
9220
9225
9295
9300
9380
4020
4025
3210
3220
3225
3230
3900
3905
3310
3335
3870
3875
3285
Traffic Density
336
336
336
336
336
343
343
255
186
596
596
471
596
11338
11338
13072
13072
13072
17931
17931
11765
11765
11765
11765
10200
10200
13800
13800
11467
11467
12944
Texture
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
SL
SL
SL
SL
SL
SL
SCL
Sic
Sic
Sic
C
Sic
Sic
Sic
Sic
CL
Sic
Sic
352

-------
Sample
9305
9315
9485
9310
9325
9340
9345
9360
9390
5620
5685
3650
3660
3665
3670
3675
3695
9480
3105
3425
9490
9495
3435
9010
9015
9020
9070
9075
9090
9095
Traffic Density
8464
8464
11494
9708
9456
9456
9456
9456
9456
12514
12514
16128
16128
12514
12514
12514
12514
12514
9588
8651
5918
5918
6654
7154
7154
6776
7154
7154
7154
7154
Texture
C
C
Sic
SL
C
C
C
C
C
Sic
Sic
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Sic
C
C
C
C
Sic
Sic
Sic
Sic
Sic
C
Sic
353

-------
Sample
9100
9105
9115
9125
9130
5575
5615
5645
5660
5675
3080
3090
3100
9195
9290
9205
9210
9280
9365
9370
5440
5445
5555
5730
5780
5545
5635
5365
5370
5625
5695
Traffic Density
7154
7154
7154
7154
7154
10637
9362
9362
9362
10637
16219
16219
16219
8209
8197
11708
11708
11817
11708
11708
16882
16882
13800
13700
13700
18245
18354
15257
15257
18354
17119
Texture
Sic
Sic
C
Sic
Sic
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
SL
SCL
C
C
C
C
C
C
SL
C
C
354

-------
Sample
5670
5520
5665
5225
5230
5485
5240
5480
5490
5550
5510
5585
5080
5085
5090
5095
5100
5105
5110
5115
5455
5460
5725
5410
5415
5360
5400
5405
9465
5605
Traffic Density
1244
13800
11765
20890
20362
20890
13800
17452
17452
17000
15000
18245
18790
18790
18790
18790
18790
18790
18790
18790
15442
15442
12411
20928
20928
20928
15570
15570
20362
17119
Texture
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Sic
Sic
C
SL
Sic
Sic
Sic
Sic
Sic
Sic
Sic
Sic
Sic
Sic
Sic
Sic
SCL
SCL
SL
SL
SL
C
C
355

-------
Sample
5560
5380
5390
5595
5680
5700
5505
9475
5130
5135
5525
5540
9470
5715
5495
5500
5590
5470
5690
5710
5165
5465
5770
5565
7815
7840
7690
7750
7835
Traffic Density
17119
13000
13000
13000
18354
11765
17000
18354
14000
14000
14000
19000
17047
15156
18548
14769
12411
18245
18548
18245
18245
18245
13700
16500
31542
31542
20141
21300
31542
Texture
Sic
SL
SL
SL
C
C
C
C
Sic
Sic
Sic
C
C
C
C
Sic
Sic
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Sic
Sic
C
C
C
356

-------
Sample
7700
7705
7720
7775
7675
7390
7395
7415
7790
7660
7680
7845
7760
7640
7780
7805
7170
7180
7850
7810
7075
7100
7580
7605
7620
7630
7655
7745
7800
3700
Traffic Density
20572
18424
14500
18790
19578
23885
23885
22670
31542
31542
19578
20432
21300
27537
31542
20928
20483
21300
18216
20141
18790
18790
18790
18790
13684
13684
13684
13684
20432
37850
Texture
Sic
C
SL
Sic
Sic
C
C
SL
C
Sic
Sic
C
C
C
C
Sic
C
C
C
C
Sic
Sic
Sic
Sic
Sic
Sic
Sic
Sic
C
CL
357

-------
Sample
7515
7520
7525
7545
7550
7610
7645
7710
7765
7340
7385
7785
7185
7665
7670
7825
7685
7755
7220
7225
7265
7270
7275
7290
7585
7725
7820
7830
7650
Traffic Density
37850
37850
37850
37850
37850
37850
37850
21336
20432
16381
16381
31542
9098
31542
31542
31542
31542
20928
20432
20432
12331
20432
20432
12331
20432
21300
31542
31542
20000
Texture
CL
C
CL
CL
CL
CL
CL
C
C
LS
SL
Sic
Sic
Sic
Sic
Sic
Sic
SL
C
C
C
C
C
C
Sic
C
C
C
CL
358

-------
Table 2.  Classification of Top-Soils According  to S.C.S.  Soil
          Texture Classes
           SILTY CLAY    SANDY       CLAY        SANDY  CLAY     LOAMY
CLAY(C)    (Sic)         LOAM (SL)   LOAM  (CL)   LOAM (SCL)     SAND  (LS)
  142          93          17
                               359

-------
Table 3.   Laboratory Analysis of Subsample of 50 Soils  for Grain
          Size,  pH,  Organic Content and Clay Mineralogy (10 Samples)
#
5130
7675
1395
7705
7170
7800
3695
9090
5590
9115
3210
5550
7700
9205
5460
9315
5115
9100
5605
CLASS
16
16
90
90
9

9
12
16
12
16
9
18
9
16
41
16
16
9
GRAIN
SIZE
Sic
Sic
C
C
C
C
C
C
Sic
C
Sic
C
Sic
C
Sic
SL
Sic
Sic
C
CHECK pH
/ 7.3
/ 7.8
/ 7.2
/ 7.8
/ 7.8
/ 7.6
/ 7.6
SL 7.3
/ 7.4
SL 7.2
/ 7.7
/ 7.9
/ 7.1
/ 7.8
/ 7.1
/ 7.6
/ 7.8
LS 6.8
/ 7.4
ORG
0.7
8.8
15.9
11.8
11.3
11.4
8.2
8.1
11.0
12.0
7.3
11.5
11.7
8.3
9.0
5.2
12.3
2.7
11.3
CLAY MINS CLAY MINS
<.02y >.02p
Ml K3 Ml K2 M2
Q3
Ml K3 Ml K2 M2
Ml K3 Ml K2 Q3
Ml K3 Ml K2 QS
MI K3 MI K3 Q3

MI K3 Mj K2 Q3

Ml K3 Mi3 Mi K2 M2


Ml K3 013 M! K2 013



MCI K? Ki Mi-z Mc-i
J -L J J.



                                  360

-------
#
3650
9345
9390
5455
7790
7835
2440
7630
2460
3675
5495
7075
2480
5585
7850
7185
9325
7745
5480
5660
5665
7100
CLASS
9
9
9
90
9
9
9
16
16
9
9
18
9
85
9
16
9
18
85
9
9
16
GRAIN
SIZE
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Sic
Sic
C
C
Sic
C
Sic
C
Sic
C
Sic
Sic
C
C
Sic
CHECK pH
/ 7.9
S 7.8
/ 7.7
/ 7.9
/ 7.6
/ 7.6
/ 7.8
/ 7.4
/ 7.2
/ 7.8
/ 7.4
SCL 5.5
/ 7.3
/ 7.0
SC 7.5
/ 7.6
SCL 7.4
/ 7.6
/ 7.2
SC 7.8
/ 7.4
SL 7.5
ORG CLAY MINS CLAY MINS
% < . 02y > . 02(j
13.1
1.3
8.2
9.6 Mj K3 Q3 M! K2 Q13
13.4
11.1
12.3
8.0
9.6
12.7
7.8
12.9
11.7
5.5
6.2
8.8
4.8
9.6
5.3
5.5
11.5
12.4
361

-------
#
5505
7725
5080
5485
7680
3335
9305
5670
5715
CLASS
9
85
16
9
16
16
41
9
9
GRAIN
SIZE
C
Sic
Sic
C
Sic
Sic
SL
C
C
CHECK pH
/ 7.6
/ 7.6
SL 7.4
/ 7.7
/ 7.4
/ 7.2
/ 7.3
/ 7.7
/ 7.8
ORG CLAY MINS CLAY MINS
% <.02y >.02u
10.6
9.6
4.8
11.2
10.5
12.1
4.3
13.0
12.8
362

-------
M   =   Montmorillonite




K   =   Kaolinite




Mi  =   Mica (Illitie)




Me  =   Mixed layered clays;  montmorillonite/mica.




Q   =   Quartz
1   =   > 40%                 Estimation from




2   =   > 20%                 areas under x-ray diffractogram




3   =   < 10%                 curve.
Note:  % will not necessarily sum to 100% due to non-crystalline




       allophanic substances within clay fraction.
                             363

-------
Table 4.  Summary of the Percentage  of Organic Matter in Soils of  the
          Laboratory Analyzed Sub-Sample
Percent Organic
Matter             >1%       >3%       >6%       >9%       >12%      >15%
# Samples           2         7        10        19        10
                             364

-------
                         References
Bittel, J.E. and Miller, R.J., 1974.  Lead, cadmium  and
     calcium selectivity coefficients on montmori1lonite,
     illite and kaolinite.  Journal Environmental  Quality,
     rr _ ^ r f\ ""i r~ T
     3 : 250-253.

Lindsay,  W.L.
     in soils
     pp .  41-51
1973.   Inorganic reactions of sewage wastes
 Chapter 3 of micro-nutrients in Agriculture,
Singer, M.J., and Hanson, L., 1969.  Lead accumulations in
     soils near highways in the Twin Cities metropolitan
     area.  Soil Science Society of America Proceedings,
     33, pp. 152-153.
                          365

-------
                                   TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
   EPA-600/1-78-055
                              2.
                                                            3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
  EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF AUTOMOBILE
  TRAFFIC ON BLOOD LEAD LEVELS
              5. REPORT DATE
               August 1978
              6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
  D. Johnson,  R.  Prevost, J. Tillery,  K.  Kimball,
  J. Hosenfeld
                                                            8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
  Southwest  Research Institute
  3600 Yoakum Blvd.
  Houston, Texas 77006
              10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.

                  1AA601
              11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.

                  68-02-2227
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
  Health Effects Research Laboratory
  Office of  Research and Development
  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
                                                            13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
RTF, NC
              14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE

                  EPA 600/11
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
       This study investigated the  absorption of lead by persons of different  age-sex
   groups  exposed to automobile emissions of lead at traffic  densities from  less  than
   1,000 cars per day to 25,000 cars per day.   The relationships between traffic
   density and lead in various environmental samples were also examined.  A  house-to-
   house survey based on a strict  set of selection criteria was used to recruit study
   participants.  At each house a  series of environmental measurements were  taken:
   traffic volume, tap water, paint-interior and exterior, housedust and window sill
   wipes.   Two blood samples were  taken a week apart.  In the range of traffic
   exposures studied no relationship with blood lead levels was observed  (maximum mean
   air  lead  < 2.0 yg/m3).  A positive relationship between smoking and blood lead
   levels  was found for both males and females.  This relationship was statistically
   significant for females but not for males.
17.
                                KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
                                              b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                            c. COSATI Held/Group
  lead
  blood  analysis
  toxicity
  automobiles
  vehicular  traffic
  epidemiology
  environmental surveys
    Dallas

    Texas
 06 F,  T
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

   RELEASE TO PUBLIC
 19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
  UNCLAj
3. SECURiT
        SSIFIED
                                              20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
                                                 UNCLASSIFIED
21. NO. OF PAGES

  378
                            22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (Rev. 4-77)   PREVIOUS EDITION is OBSOLETE
                                             366

-------