United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
                         Office of
                         Emergency and
                         Remedial Response
EPA/ROD/R02-92/173
September 1992
PB93-963822
SEPA   Superfund
          Record of Decision:
          Facet Enterprises, NY

-------
                                         NOTICE

The appendices listed in the index that are not found in this document have been removed at the request of
the issuing agency. They contain material which supplement but adds no further applicable information to
the content of the document All supplemental material is, however, contained in the administrative record
for this site.

-------
50272-101
REPORT DOCUMENTATION
PAGE
1. REPORT NO.
EPA/ROD/R02-92/173
2.
3. Recipient1* Acceeaion No.
 4. THto and Subtitle
   SUPERFUND RECORD OF DECISION
   Facet  Enterprises,  NY
   First  Remedial  Action - Final
5. Report Date
 09/04/92
 7. Aulhon»
                                                                    8. Performing Organization Rapt No.
 «. Performing Organization Nam* end AddiMB
10. ProJecl/Taek/Work UnH No.
                                                                    11. Contr*ct(C) or Grant(Q) No.

                                                                    (C)

                                                                    (G)
 12. Sponeorlng Organization Htm* and Addm*
   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
   401 M Street,  S.W.
   Washington,  D.C.  20460
13. Typo of Report * Period Covered

  800/000
                                                                    14.
 15. Supplementary Notee

   PB93-963822
 18. Ab*tmct(Umlt: 200 word*)

  The  31-acre Facet  Enterprises  site is a manufacturing facility located  in the Village
  of Elmira Heights,  Chemung County,  New York.   Land use in the area is primarily
  residential and commercial.  The  site overlies a Class Ila  aquifer, which is a
  potential source of potable water.   The facility,  constructed in 1895,.  was first used
  by Eclipse,  Inc. to manufacture bicycles.  From 1900 to 1960,  Eclipse manufactured
  motorcycles, engine and airplane  parts, military support parts,  ammunition,  and fuel
  pumps.   During that time, Bendix  Aviation Corporation acquired control  of Eclipse.
  From 1960 to 1975,  Eclipse, then  a division of Bendix, manufactured electric clutches
  and  brakes.   In 1974,  Facet Enterprises was organized; then,  in 1989, Purolator
  Products Company became the corporate successor to Facet.   Over 10 different areas were
  used at  the site for disposal  of  wastes, including plating  wastes, oil  sludge, metal
  hydroxide sludge,  chromic acid, PCBs, grinding chips, and miscellaneous  liquid wastes.
  These areas include an oil/water  separator, ponds, lagoons,  drainage ways,  and several
  dry  wells for the  disposal of  liquid wastes.   Since 1979, several site  investigations
  have been conducted by EPA and the state.  A  1986 draft remedial investigation revealed
  that VOCs,  PCBs, and PAHs were present in site soil and sediment, and that VOCs,

   (See Attached Page)
 17. Document AnalyeJe a. Descriptor*
   Record of Decision  -  Facet Enterprises,  NY
   First Remedial Action - Final
   Contaminated Media: soil,  sediment,  debris, gw
   Key Contaminants: VOCs (benzene, PCE,  TCE, toluene,  xylenes),  other organics (PAHs,
       ^  ~- *^,     PCBs),  metals '(arsenic, lead)
   b. Uentifiera/Open-Ended Terme    •
   c. COSATI Reid/Group
 18. Availability Statement
                                                     18. Security Cleee (Thie Report)
                                                            None
                                                     20. Security Cleee (Thie Page)
                                                     	None	
           21. No. of Pagee
             146
                                                                               22. Price
(See ANSI-Z39.1S)
                                      See Instruction* on Ronne
           OPTIONAL FORM 272 (4-77)
           (Formerly NTO45)
           Department of Commerce

-------
EPA/ROD/R02-92/173
Facet Enterprises, NY
Second Remedial Action - Final

Abstract  (Continued)

organics, and inorganics were detected in ground water and surface water drainage streams
at concentrations above New York State standards.  Remedial measures, which were
implemented at the site in 1979, included excavating surface water diversions, covering
past disposal areas with soil, and constructing a leachate collection system.  In 1992,
Purolator excavated and removed 469 buried drums; excavated 2,250 tons of contaminated
soil; and removed and sent 30,000 gallons of contaminated liquids offsite to a RCRA
facility  .  This ROD addresses a final remedy for the onsite contaminated soil, sediment,
debris, and ground water.  The primary contaminants of concern affecting the soil,
sediment, debris, and ground water are VOCs, including TCE, benzene, toluene, xylenes,
and PCE; other organics, including PCBs and PAHs; and metals, including arsenic, and
lead.

he selected remedial action for this site includes excavating contaminated soil and
sediment from the disposal areas; disposing of approximately 1,275 cubic yards of TSCA
waste with PCBs concentrations greater than 50 ppm offsite in a secure double-lined
landfill facility; stabilizing of all RCRA wastes to prevent leaching of metals and
disposing of 2,124 cubic yards of waste in a secure offsite RCRA-lined facility;
disposing of approximately 120 cubic yards of non-RCRA wastes in an offsite industrial
waste landfill; extracting and storing contaminated ground water in a central onsite
collection tank, followed by treatment using air stripping to remove VOCs, and filtration
and precipitation to remove metals, if necessary; discharging the treated effluent onsite
to the facility non-contact cooling system or to surface water; and implementing a
long-term ground water monitoring program and institutional controls including land use
restrictions.  The estimated present worth cost for this remedial action is $4,850,656,
which includes an annual O&M cost of $1,305,596 for 20 years.

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OR GOALS:

Action levels for excavation of surface soil/sediment are health-based and include
benzo(a) anthracene 20 ppm/3 ppm; benzo(b)flouroanthene
20 ppm/3 ppm; benzo(k)flouranthene 43 ppm/7 ppm; benzo(a)pyrene-
3 ppm/1 ppm; indeno(l,2,3-cd)  pyrene 12 ppm/2 ppm; dibenzo(a,h) anthracene 3 ppm/1 ppm;
PCBs 10 ppm/1 ppm; arsenic 19 ppm/7 ppm;  and chromium 1110 ppm in sediment only.  Action
levels for excavation of subsurface soil are also health-based and include
benzo(a)anthracene 54 ppm; benzo(b)fluoranthene 55 ppm; benzo(k)flouranthene 118 ppm;
benzo (a) pyrene 8 ppm; indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 33 ppm; PCBs 25 ppm; and arsenic 52 ppm.
Chemical-specific clean-up goals for soil and sediment are based on RCRA TCLP, Land Ban
regulations, and TSCA regulations.  Chemical-specific ground water clean-up goals are
based on SDWA MCLs and state drinking water standards including TCE 5 ug/1; xylenes 5
ug/1; and lead 25 ug/1.  Chemical-specific ARARs will be waived if it is determined by
EPA that certain portions of the ground water cannot be restored for beneficial use.

-------
                                 ROD FACT SHEET

 SITE

 Site name:  Facet Enterprises,  Inc.

 Site location:  Village  of  Elmira Heights,  Chemung  County,  New York

 HRS  score:  46.67


 ROD

 Date Signed:  September 4,  1992

 Selected remedy: Soil and Sediment - Off-site Shipment for Treatment and Disposal
                  Ground Water  -  Pump,  filtration/precipitation,  air  stripping

 Capital cost: $3,545,060

 O &  M cost: $1,305,596

 Present-worth cost:  $4,850,656


 LEAD

 United States Environmental Protection,Agency

 Primary Contact:  J.  Jeffrey Josephson  (212) 264-4183

 Secondary Contact: Kevin Lynch (212) 264-6194

Main PRPs: Purolator Products Company
           Allied-Signal Corporation
Waste type: VOCs, PAHs, PCBs, Metals

Waste origin: Industrial Disposal

Estimated waste  quantity:  At  least  3,519 cubic  yards sediment  and  soil and
4.7xl08  gallons  contaminated  ground water

Contaminated mediums: Soil, sediment, and Ground water

-------
           RECORD OF DECISION

             Facet Enterprises, Inc.

Village of Elmira Heights, Chemung County, New York
   United States Environmental Protection Agency
                  Region II
             New York, New York
                  June 1992

-------
       DECLARATION FOR  THE RECORD OF DECISION
SITE NAME AND LOCA TION

Facet Enterprises, Inc.
Village of Elmira Heights
Chemung County, New York

STA TEMENT OF BASIS AND PURPOSE

This decision document presents the selected remedial action for the Facet Enterprises,
Inc. Site, which was chosen in accordance with the requirements of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (CERCLA),
and  to the extent practicable, the  National Oil and Hazardous Substances  Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP). This decision document explains the factual and legal basis for
selecting the remedy for this Site.

The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) concurs with
the selected remedy, per the letter attached as Appendix IV. The information supporting
this remedial action decision is contained in the administrative record for this site, the index
of which is attached as Appendix III.

ASSESSMENT OF THE SITE

Actual or threatened releases of hazardous substances from the site, if not addressed by
implementing the response actions selected in this Record of Decision, may present an
imminent and substantial endangerment to public health, welfare or the  environment.
DESCRIPTION OF THE SELECTED REMEDY
The major components of the selected remedy for the treatment of soils, sediments, and
ground water at the Facet Enterprises, Inc. Site include the following:   '
  o Excavation of contaminated soils and sediments from the Disposal Areas as identified
    in the Risk Assessment and in those areas where soils and sediment pose a risk to
    ground water quality,

  o  Disposal of TSCA waste (PCBs > 50 ppm) in a secure TSCA double lined landfill
    facility (estimated at approximately 1,275 cubic yards),

  o  Stabilization of RCRA waste to prevent leaching of metals and subsequent disposal
    in a secure RCRA lined facility (approximate volume 2,124 cubic yards),

-------
   o Disposal of non-RCRA wastes in an industrial waste landfill (approximate volume
     120 cubic yards),

   o Strategic placement of pumping wells to extract the contaminated ground water
     from the aquifer,

   o Storage of extracted ground water in a central collection tank for subsequent
     treatment in an above-ground system,

  o  Treatment of the contaminated ground water to meet Federal and State Standards
     for surface water discharge. Treated ground water would then be either discharged
     as effluent to the facility non-contact cooling system, or to a surface water
     discharge,

   o Recommendation that local institutional controls, in the form of local zoning
     ordinances, be implemented in an attempt to control any future site use that could
     create an exposure pathway to subsurface soils,

  o  Recommendation that institutional controls be provided/maintained to restrict
     access to those portions of the aquifer which remain contaminated above cleanup
     levels, and

   o Implementation of a long-term monitoring program to track the migration and
     concentrations of the contaminants of concern.
DECLARA TION OF STA TUTORY DETERMINA TIONS

The selected remedy is protective  of human health and the environment, complies with
federal and state requirements that are legally applicable or relevant and appropriate to the
remedial action, and is cost effective.  The selected remedy utilizes permanent solutions
and alternative treatment (or resource recovery) technologies to the maximum extent
practicable, and it satisfies the statutory preference for remedies that employ treatment that
reduces toxicity, mobility,  or volume as their principal  element.

Because this remedy will result in hazardous substances remaining on site above health-
based levels, a review will be conducted within five years after commencement of remedial
action, and every five years thereafter, to ensure that the remedy continues to provide
adequate protection of human health and the environment.
     Constantine Sidamon-Eristoff
      Regional Administrator

-------
          RECORD OF DECISION
           DECISION SUMMARY
            Facet Enterprises, Inc.


Village of Elmira Heights, Chemung County, New York
   United States Environmental Protection Agency
                  Region II
             New York, New York

-------
                        TABLE OF CONTENTS
SITE NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION 	1

SITE HISTORY AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES	3

HIGHLIGHTS OF COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION	4

SCOPE AND ROLE OF OPERABLE UNIT	4

SUMMARY OF SITE CHARACTERISTICS 	5

SUMMARY OF SITE RISKS 	8

DESCRIPTION  OF REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES	13

SUMMARY OF COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES	20

SELECTED REMEDY	25

STATUTORY DETERMINATIONS	27

DOCUMENTATION OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGES	29
ATTACHMENTS

APPENDIX (.FIGURES
APPENDIX Il.TABLES
APPENDIX (((.ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
APPENDIX IV.STATE LETTER OF CONCURRENCE
APPENDIX V.RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY

-------
 SITE NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION

 The Facet Enterprises, Inc. site includes a 31-acre parcel of land in the Village of Elmira
 Heights, Chemung County, New York. The Facet Enterprises facility property is bounded
 to the north by a municipal golf course, to the east by State Route 14, to the south
 by residential property along West 17th  and West 18th Streets, and to the west by
 residential property and Robinwood Avenue. The Village of Elmira Heights is a mixture of
 residential, commercial, industrial, and wooded land, but the section  in which the site is
 located is zoned primarily for residential and commercial use. The closest residences are
 within 60 feet of the present manufacturing facility to the south and west. (See Figure 1.)

 Approximately one half of the facility property is currently developed.  Between one third
 and one quarter of the facility property is comprised of one manufacturing plant and the
 foundation and cement slab of a former manufacturing plant, while the remainder of the
 developed property is comprised of parking  areas or other small production  buildings
 including a starter drive laboratory, a maintenance shop, a fuel pump test laboratory, a
 boiler room, and several other small buildings.  (See Figure 2.)

 The facility is not located on  or adjacent to a New York State regulated wetland.  Any
 existing Federally regulated wetlands at the Site will be delineated prior to conducting any
 remediation activities.  No Federal or State endangered species have been identified at the
 site, and no critical habitats are present.

 The Facet facility was constructed in 1895 and was used by the Eclipse Bicycle Company
 (Eclipse) for the manufacture of bicycles.  In the early 1900s, Eclipse began manufacturing
 motorcycles and engine parts and changed its name to Eclipse Machine Company. During
 World  Wars I and II, Eclipse manufactured military support  parts, ammunition, airplane
 parts, and  fuel  pumps.  In 1929, Bendix Aviation Corporation, later to become Bendix
 Corporation (Bendix), acquired control of Eclipse. Although the Eclipse name remained,
 Bendix controlled the company. From 1960 until 1975, Eclipse, as a  division of Bendix,
 manufactured electric clutches and brakes.

 Facet Enterprises, Inc. was organized as a result of an antitrust action between Bendix and
the U.S.  Federal Trade Commission in  1974.  Purolator Products Company  (Purolator)
 became the corporate successor to Facet  in 1989 and maintains the  Purolator name to
date.

The following areas at the facility are known to have been used for  disposal purposes
based on the site history.

Area 1 - Plating wastes, oil sludges, and grinding wastes were disposed of in this area
between  1960 and 1971.  Liquid wastes may have also been disposed in this area; lime
was dumped here in an attempt to neutralize the waste prior to covering it with  soil.

Area 2 - Plating waste was thought to have been disposed of at Area 2 between 1960 and
1971. Attempts were apparently made to neutralize the waste prior to covering it with soil.

-------
Area 3 - Plating waste, oil sludge, grinding waste and non-characterized liquids may have
been disposed of at Area 3 between 1940 and 1965. After 1965, miscellaneous'wastes
(cinder blocks, metal grindings) were disposed of at Area 3 until 1980.  During  use, the
area was periodically covered and graded.  Leachate outbreaks have been noted at the
base of this disposal  area.

Area 4 • Oils and unknown liquid wastes were disposed of in this currently inactive lagoon
between 1920 and 1971.  Liquid from this area previously  was discharged to the North
Drainage Way via a swale which is now filled. In  1981 a soil sample collected from Area
4 contained polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) at 320 parts per million (ppm).

Area 5 - Area 5 was previously used as a sludge disposal area containing wastewater
treatment units and sand filter beds; metal hydroxide sludge was disposed of in Area 5 until
1965.  After 1965, sludge  was spread over the surface. The area has been filled and
seeded. Sampling conducted by NYSDEC in 1981 detected the presence of cadmium and
chromium in excess of 100,000 ppm and  copper  in excess of 10,000 ppm.

Area 6 - This area, constructed in the early 1970s, is a small pond originally designed to
collect seepage and runoff from Areas 1 and 2. Chromic acid may have been treated near
this area.

Area 7 - Ash from the production facilities was stored at Area 7 from the early 1940s to
the mid 1950s.

Area 8 - Sediments and oily soil have drained over time from a drain pipe from Area 4 into
this area.

Area 9 - Ash from the production facilities was stored at Area 9 from the early 1940s to the
mid 1950s.

Area 10 •  Heat treatment water,  non-contact  cooling water, and possibly oils were
disposed of in this lagoon. The lagoon is  no longer active but a surface water impound-
ment remains in this area.  This area is thought to have once been a filter bed.

Plant 2 Yard • Grinding chips, machinery oil, and drummed waste were stored in this area
from as early as 1940. The area has been graded and seeded.

Oil/Water Separator - This area was used to segregate oil and particulates from runoff
or treatment  water at the  facility.   The oil/water separator is located at the southern
boundary of the property.

Dry Wells - Up to five dry wells used for the disposal of liquid wastes and/or water from
the facility are present at the facility.  The dry wells are being closed pursuant to a consent
order with the New York State Department of Envrionmental Conservation (NYSDEC).

-------
Surface Water -  In addition to the Area 10 lagoon and the Area 6 pond, Mays Creek, an
unnamed drainage way south of the Facet facility, and a drainage way which drains surface
water from the northern portion of  the facility have all received  industrial  waste from
production activities by way of surface run-off and point source discharge.
SITE HISTORY AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES

Several investigations of the facility have been conducted by EPA or NYSDEC since 1979.
In 1979, an initial Facility inspection conducted by NYSDEC resulted in the implementation
of remedial measures which included excavation of surface water diversions, covering of
past disposal areas with soil, and construction of a leachate collection system. A facility
inspection and sampling was conducted by USEPA in 1980, and additional sampling and
investigation was conducted by NYSDEC during March and June 1981. These investiga-
tions  indicated that volatile organics, inorganics, pesticides, and PCB compounds  were
present in surface soils, in soils and sediments in the disposal areas, and "in surface water
drainage streams at the facility.

The Site  was first proposed for the National Priorities List on October 1, 1981 and was
placed on  the NPL on  September  1,  1983.   In  1983 a  preliminary hydrogeologic
investigation was conducted  at the facility by Facet Enterprises,  Inc. under an EPA
Administrative Order pursuant to Section 3013 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA). The investigation concluded that trichloroethylene (TCE) contamination in the
ground water exceeded NYSDEC standards.  In 1986, Facet Enterprises, Inc. agreed to
conduct a Remedial Investigation /Feasibility Study (RI/FS) under a CERCLA Administrative
Order (Allied-Signal Corporation, the corporate successor to Bendix Corporation, was also
a signatory to this consent order). The 1986 draft Rl  concluded that TCE, perchloro-
ethylene,  1,1,1-trichloroethane,  1,1-dichloroethane,  trans  -1,2-dichloroethene,  1,2-
dichlorobenzene,  trichlorofluoromethane,  methylene  chloride, acetone,  PCBs,  and
polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were present in Site soils.  In addition, 14  volatile
organic contaminants, pentachlorophenol, and 4 inorganics contaminants were detected
in ground water at concentrations above  NYSDEC standards.

Based upon a review of the 1986 Rl, EPA concluded that additional Site characterization
was required before the Rl could be finalized. In 1990, Purolator began the necessary field
work  required to complete the Rl.  The findings of this field work are reported below.

Enforcement

Facet Enterprises, Inc. has conducted investigations under the following Administrative
orders with the EPA:

1) Administrative Order RCRA 11-3013-20201 -April 8,1983 - Hydrogeological Investigation

2) Administrative Order CERCLA II-60205 - May 1986 - (Allied-Signal is also a signatory this
Order). -  Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study

-------
 Facet Enterprises, Inc. has conducted investigations under the following Administrative
 order with the NYSDEC:

 1) NYSDEC Consent Order under the Clean Water Act R8-0771-90-04 - Dry Well
 Investigation
 HIGHLIGHTS OF COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION

 The Rl report, FS report, and the Proposed Plan for the Site were released to the public
 for comment on May 27,1992. These documents were made available to the public in the
 administrative  record file at the  EPA Docket Room in  Region II,  New York and the
 information repositories at Village of Elmira Heights, Village Hall, 215 Elmwood Ave, Village
 of Elmira Heights, New York. The notice of availability for the above-referenced documents
 was published in the Elmira Star-Gazette on May 27, 1992. The public comment period
 on these documents was held from May 27, 1992-until June 27, 1992.

 On June 16, 1992,  EPA,  the NYSDEC,  and the New York State Department of Health
 conducted  a public  meeting at the Village  of Elmira Heights Village  Hall, to inform local
 officials and interested citizens about the Superfund process, to review current and planned
 remedial activities at the Site, and to respond to any questions from area residents and
 other attenders.

 Responses to the comments received at the public meeting and in writing during the public
 comment period are included in the Responsiveness Summary (see  Appendix V).
SCOPE AND ROLE OF OPERABLE UNIT

This Record of Decision outlines EPA's strategy to eliminate the threat to human health and
the environment posed by contaminated ground  water and contaminated soils  and
sediments present at the Site.  Specifically, remediation of soil and sediment in disposal
areas in concentrations above site specific cleanup levels will be conducted. The proposed
remediation of ground water will treat contaminated ground water at the facility to meet
Federal and State  drinking water  standards.  No  further operable units are currently
planned for this site.

During the Spring of 1992, pursuant to the CERCLA Administrative Order,  Purolator
excavated and removed 469 drums buried in Disposal Areas 1,2,3, and 4.  In addition,
2,250 tons of contaminated soil was excavated and 30,000 gallons of contaminated liquids
were removed to be sent off-site for treatment and disposal at a permitted industrial waste
landfill.  The drum and soil excavation activities were conducted with oversight by EPA.
Purolator and EPA collected confirmatory samples  from the excavation floor in each of
these disposal areas.   Based on the data obtained during the  Summer 1992,  EPA will
evaluate if further action is required.

-------
 Once the excavation of the drums and the contaminated soil from Disposal Areas 1,2, and
 3 is completed, the potential threat that these materials pose to ground  water 'will be
 removed. Final remediation of Disposal Area 4 is discussed  in this ROD.

 Dry well closure, which includes excavation of contaminated sediment and sludges, will be
 addressed by  Purolator Products Company under the consent agreement with the
 NYSDEC.

 The proposed actions to be undertaken  at this Site, in conjunction with dry well cleanup
 actions currently underway under the supervision of the NYSDEC, will address the sources
 of ground water contamination and the principal threats posed by contaminated soils and
 sediments.
SUMMARY OF SITE CHARACTERISTICS

A. Site Geology and Hydrology

The Purolator facility lies along the western side  of the Newtown Creek Valley.  The
unconsolidated sediments which underlain the western portion of the facility consist of
sands, silts, and clays.  In the eastern portion of the facility the unconsolidated sediments
consist of outwash sands and gravels and may contain silts and clays.  The ground-water
flow direction, as determined by water level measurements taken at facility monitoring wells,
is south easterly.   Figure 3 illustrates ground-water flow direction measured during the
summer of 1990.  Figure 4  presents the estimated regional ground water flow direction
presented in  the  Kentucky Avenue Wellfield Remedial Investigation  Report.  Figure 5
illustrates surface  water drainage at the facility.


B. Nature and Extent of Contamination

The following section summarizes the known contamination at and near the facility as
determined during the Remedial Investigation: This study consisted of the following: eighty-
five soil samples were collected from the surface soils or from subsurface borings in known
or suspected disposal areas; twenty-five sediment samples were collected from streams;
ponds or lagoons  at the facility or .in streams adjacent to the facility; fourteen ground water
samples were collected from monitoring wells or production wells at or near the facility; and
8 surface  water samples were  collected from streams  or lagoons at the facility or in
streams adjacent to  the facility. Tables 1-11 present analytical data collected  during
remedial investigation activities.  More detailed descriptions of the work can be found in the
Rl report.

Area  1/Area 2 -   A total of 27 samples from these areas were collected for chemical
analyses from depths ranging from 1 to 12 feet below ground level. Soil collected from one
boring in Area 2 had elevated levels of contaminants.  The analytical results indicate the

-------
presence of cadmium (351 ppm), chromium (2410 ppm), and copper (1120 ppm). The
maximum TCE concentration in soil was 110 ppb. (Table 1)

Area 3 • A total of 12 samples were collected for chemical analyses from this area at
depths from 8 to 14 feet below ground surface.  Elevated levels of chromium (2110 ppm),
cadmium (72.3 ppm), and copper (270 ppm) were found in soil samples. (Table 2)

Area 4 - A total of 13 samples from this area were collected for  chemical analyses at
depths ranging  from 8 to 20.5 feet below ground surface. The soil borings in this area
indicate that a  layer of fill approximately 8 feet thick is  saturated with oil product.
Numerous volatiles and semi-volatiles were detected in Area 4 including toluene (210 ppb),
PCB (Arochlor 1248) (35 ppm). (Table 3)

Area 5 • Three samples out of the 21 samples collected at depths ranging from 8 to 20 feet
below ground surface from Area 5 had elevated levels of chromium (13,000 ppm). TCE
was detected in 14 soil samples in concentrations up to 240 ppb. (Table 4)

Area 6 - Two surface soil samples collected from pond sediments had TCE in concentra-
tions  up to 130  ppb.  Elevated  levels of arsenic (588 ppm), cadmium (79 ppm), and
chromium (1220 ppm) were also detected.  Confirmatory sampling conducted during the
FS, completed in order to determine the presence of Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) hazardous waste, revealed that a sediment sample exhibited the characteristic
for cadmium waste. (Table 5)

Area 7 - Three surface soil samples were collected from this area. PCB compounds were
detected at concentrations ranging from 0.32 ppm to 5.3 ppm. Semi-volatile organics were
detected in the one surface sediment sample at concentrations up to 22 ppm. (Table 5)

Area 8 - Area 8  soils contained elevated concentrations of eighteen semi-volatile organic
compounds at concentrations up to 69 ppm (benzo(b)fluoranthene). PCBs were detected
in concentrations up to 11 ppm. (Table 5)

Area 9 - The one surface soil sample collected from Area 9 contained 1  ppm PCBs. (Table
5)

Area 10 - Two sediment samples and one duplicate sample was collected from Area 10.
PCBs were detected in sediments in concentrations up to 14 ppm: Cadmium (796 ppm),
chromium (10,100 ppm), and copper (1,110 ppm) were detected in-these surface sediment
samples. (Table 5)

Plant 2 Yard - Soil sampling (24 samples including duplicate samples in  soil boring
samples collected from 0-8 feet below the ground surface.) conducted  during the 1986 Rl
field work detected TCE in concentrations ranging from 3.4 ppb to 253 ppb.  In addition
the analyses revealed tetrachloroethylene (150 ppb), 1,1,1-trichloroethane (48.1 ppb), and
1,1  dichloroethane (8.58 ppb). (Table 6)

-------
 Oil/Water Separator -  Twenty  two semi-volatile compounds  (8  of which  were in
 concentrations over 100,000 ppb) were detected in soil collected from near the oil/water
 separator.  Soil samples contained slightly elevated levels of cadmium (41.4 ppm), copper
 (502 ppm), and zinc (675 ppm). 0"able 7)

 Dry Wells • Sampling and analysis of dry well liquids, sludges, and sediment has been
 conducted by Purolator as a part of a consent order with the NYSDEC. The sampling has
 detected liquid with PCB concentrations up to 31 ppm. TCE was present in sludge material
 in concentrations up to 60 ppm. Lead was present in concentrations up to 5500 ppm, and
 chromium was present in concentrations of 450 ppm in dry well sludge. Benzene (1390
 ppb), toluene (3050 ppb), chlorobenzene (9260 ppb), ethylbenzene (3330 ppb), p-xylene
 (3780 ppb), o-xylene (3780 ppb), and 1,3-dichlorobenzene (4940 ppb) were also detected
 in dry well sludges or liquids.

 Unnamed  Drainage Swale South of Facility (Also known as the Heights Drainage
 Swale)  - Twenty-one soil and sediment samples were collected from 0 - 6 feet below
 ground surface from this area. Soil samples and boring data collected from the drainage
 way south of the Facet facility contained the semi-volatiles benzo(a)anthracene (11 ppm),
 benzo(a)pyrene (11 ppm), benzo(b)fluoranthene (30 ppm), benzo(k) fluoranthene (30 ppm),
 and ideno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene (6  ppm); PCB 1254 (6.8 ppm), and the inorganics arsenic (23
 ppm) and chromium (3920 ppm) in elevated concentrations. (Table 8)

 North Drainage Way - Arsenic (320 ppm) was detected in the North Drainage Ditch in a
 surface sediment sample collected  in July 1980. (Table 9)

 Buried Drums - A magnetometry survey and interviews with employees indicated that
 buried drums were present at the facility.  Based on the magnetometry survey results,
 Purolator Products Company, with oversight by EPA, removed 469 drums from Disposal
Areas 1,2,3 and 4.  In addition,  at least 2,250 tons of contaminated  soil  have been
excavated, and approximately 30,000 gallons of contaminated water have been contained
for off site treatment and disposal.

Surface Water  Sampling -. Seven surface water samples were collected from surface
water bodies at the Site. TCE was detected at the oil/water separator effluent at up to 26
ppb, and chloromethane was present at 24 ppb. TCE was detected in Mays Creek surface
water at 11 ppb. Surface water samples collected from Area 10 contained elevated
concentration of cadmium (77.8 ppb), chromium (2190 ppb), and zinc (894 ppb). (Table
 10)                               1

Ground water - A total of 13  monitoring wells were  installed at or  near the facility in the
unconsolidated sediments below the Site. The wells vary in depth from 12.5 feet to 49.2
feet below ground  surface.  Fourteen organics:  n-butylbenzene (13 ppb), 1,1-dichloro-
ethene (160 ppb), ethylbenzene (12 ppb), isopropylbenzene (8 ppb), 4-lsopropyltoluene
 (12 ppb), methylene chloride (69 ppb), n-propylbenzene (22 ppb), 1,1,1-trichloroethane (13
ppb), trichloroethene (190 ppb), trichlorofluoromethane (19 ppb),  1,2,4-trimethylbenzene
(18 ppb), 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (81 ppb), vinyl chloride (33 ppb Spring  1991 sampling),

-------
and xylenes (14 ppb),  and six inorganic contaminants: cadmium (55.8 ppb), chromium
(1540 ppb), copper (1200 ppb), lead (146 ppb), mercury (5.6 ppb), zinc (1180 ppb) we're
detected in ground water at the facility at concentrations  in excess of State and Federal
standards for potable drinking water sources. (Table 11)

In addition, the concentrations of antimony (45.8 ppb), beryllium (4.2 ppb), and nickel (602
ppb) exceeded either NYSDEC guidance values or EPA proposed Maximum Contaminant
Levels (MCLs), the latter of which were promulgated under the Federal Safe Drinking Water
Act.

Figures 6  and 7,  present respectively, the  sampling results of facility groundwater
monitoring wells with volatile organic contaminants or inorganic contaminants present.

The ground water contamination flows in the direction consistent with the regional ground
water flow direction. The facility contamination contributes to the contamination within the
Newtown Creek Aquifer which is classified by EPA a Class-lla aquifer.  See Figure 8.

Floating Product - EPA detected a fayer of pure product floating on top of the water table
(approximately 20 feet below the ground surface) at monitoring well D-5 located  on the
facility property. (See Figure 2).

SUMMARY OF SITE RISKS

EPA conducted a baseline risk assessment to evaluate the potential risks to human health
and the environment associated with the Facet Enterprises, Inc. Site in its current state.
The Risk Assessment focused on contaminants in the soil, sediment, surface water, ground
water and air which are likely to pose significant risks to human health  and the environ-
ment. The summary of the contaminants of  concern (COG) in sampled  matrices is listed
in Table 12.

The baseline risk assessment evaluated the health effects which could result from exposure
to contamination as a  result of ingestion of ground water, inhalation  of ground water
contaminants during showering, ingestion of sediments in the drainage swale south of the
facility, incidental ingestion of sediments while wading in the North Drainage way, ingestion
of on site  soils, ingestion  of  sediments in Mays Creek, and  incidental  ingestion  of
sediments in areas 6 and 10 lagoons. Both current and future land use at the facility was
considered to be industrial with exposure scenarios for on site workers  and trespassers.
For Mays Creek and the unnamed drainage way south of the facility, exposure to small
children and adults was considered because these areas are generally more accessible to
the public.  A total of 12 exposure pathways were evaluated under  possible on site current
and future  land-use conditions.  The exposure pathways considered under current and
future uses are  listed in Table 13.  The reasonable maximum exposure was evaluated.

Under  current  EPA guidelines,  the  likelihood  of  carcinogenic  (cancer-causing)  and
noncarcinogenic effects as a result of exposure to site chemicals are considered
separately. It was assumed that the toxic effects of the site-related chemicals would be

                                       8

-------
 additive.  Thus, carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic risks associated with exposures to
 individual compounds of concern were summed to indicate the potential risks associated
 with mixtures of potential carcinogens and noncarcinogens, respectively.

 Noncarcinogenic risks were assessed using a hazard index (HI) approach, based on a
 comparison of expected contaminant intakes and safe levels of intake (Reference Doses).
 Reference doses (RfDs) have been developed by EPA for indicating the potential for
 adverse health effects.  RfDs, which are expressed  in units of mg/kg-day, are estimates
 of daily exposure levels for humans which are thought to be safe over a lifetime (including
 sensitive individuals).  Estimated intakes of chemicals from environmental media (e.g., the
 amount of a chemical ingested from contaminated drinking water) are compared to the RfD
 to derive  the hazard quotient for the contaminant in the particular medium.  The  HI is
 obtained by adding the hazard quotients for all compounds across all media that impact
 a particular receptor population.

 An HI greater than 1.0 indicates that the potential exists for noncarcinogenic health effects
 to occur as a result of site-related exposures.  The HI provides a useful reference point for
 gauging the potential significance of multiple contaminant exposures within a single medium
 or across media.  The reference doses for the compounds of concern at the Site are
 presented in Table 14.  A summary of the noncarcinogenic risks associated with these
 chemicals across various exposure pathways is found in Table 15.

 It can  be  seen from Table 5 that the HI for noncarcinogenic effects from ingestion  of
 untreated  ground water exceeded one (HI = 46) for reasonable maximum exposure for
 children, therefore, noncarcinogenic effects may occur from the exposure routes evaluated
 in the Risk Assessment.  The noncarcinogenic risk was attributable to several compounds
 including  vinyl  chloride,  cis-1,2  dichloroethylene, TCE,  antimony, arsenic, cadmium,
 chromium, mercury, and nickel. Furthermore, it can be seen from Table 15 that the HI for
 noncarcinogenic effects from ingestion of sediment in the  unnamed drainage swale (also
 known as  the Heights drainage swale) exceeded one (HI = 3.5) for reasonable maximum
 exposure  for children, therefore,  noncarcinogenic effects may occur from the exposure
 routes evaluated in the Risk Assessment. The noncarcinogenic risk was attributable to
 several compounds including chromium..

 Potential carcinogenic risks were evaluated using the  cancer slope factors (Sfs) developed
 by EPA for  the  chemicals  of potential concern. Sfs  have been  developed  by EPA's
Carcinogenic Risk Assessment Verification Endeavor-(CRAVE) for estimating.excess lifetime
cancer risks associated with exposure to potentially carcinogenic chemicals.  Sfs which are
expressed in units of (mg/kg-day)"1, are multiplied by the estimated intake of a potential
carcinogen,  in mg/kg-day,  to generate an upper-bound estimate  of the excess lifetime
cancer risk associated with exposure to the compound at that intake  level.  The term
"upper bound" reflects the conservative estimate of the risks calculated from the SF. Use
of this  approach makes the underestimation of the risk highly unlikely.  The SF for each
indicator chemical is presented in Table 16.

-------
 For known or suspected  carcinogens, EPA considers excess  upper bound individual
 lifetime cancer risks of between 10"4 to 10"6 to be acceptable.  This level indicates that an
 individual has not greater than a  one in  ten thousand to one in a million chance  of
 developing  cancer as a result of site-related exposure to  a carcinogen  over a 70-year
 period under specific exposure conditions at the Site.  The total cancer risks at the Facet
 Enterprises, Inc. Site are outlined in Table 17.  In addition,  MCLs are currently exceeded
 for several hazardous substances in ground water. Although the risks posed by the soils
 are within EPA's acceptable risk criteria, contamination in the soils, if not addressed, will
 likely continue to contribute to further contamination of the  ground water at the Site.

 Uncertainties

 The procedures  and  inputs used to assess risks in this evaluation, as in  all such
 assessments, are  subject to a wide variety of uncertainties.  In general, the main sources
 of uncertainty include:

 - environmental chemistry sampling and analysis
 - environmental parameter  measurement
 - fate and transport modeling
 - exposure parameter estimation
 - toxicological data.

 Uncertainty  in environmental sampling arises in part from the potentially uneven distribution
 of chemicals in the media sampled. Consequently, there is significant uncertainty as to the
 actual  levels present.   Environmental chemistry-analysis error can  stem from several
 sources including the errors inherent in the analytical methods and characteristics of the
 matrix  being sampled.

 Uncertainties in the exposure  assessment are  related to estimates of how often an
 individual would actually come in contact with the chemicals of concern, the period of time
 over which  such  exposure  would occur,  and  in the models  used to estimate  the
 concentrations of the chemicals of concern at the point of exposure.

 Uncertainties in toxicological data occur in extrapolating both from animals to humans and
from high to low doses of exposure,  as well as from the difficulties in assessing the toxicity
 of a mixture of chemicals.  These uncertainties are addressed by .making  conservative
 assumptions concerning risk  and exposure parameters throughout the assessment. As
a result, the  Risk Assessment provides upper-bound estimates of the risks to populations
 near the Site, and  is highly  unlikely to  underestimate actual  risks related to the Site.

There are, also, additional uncertainties unique to the Site that would  serve to underesti-
mate Site-related risks. Specifically, they are: the presence of previously undetected drums
and  associated contaminated  soils;  an on-site "reservoir" of contaminants that may
potentially migrate from the facility property; designation of  future land use at the facility
property as industrial rather than residential;  and the contribution to risk resulting from - but
not quantified, as a result of limited scientific data - dermal exposure to soil-borne contaminants.

                                        10

-------
 More specific information concerning public health risks, including a quantitative evaluation
 of the degree of risk associated with various exposure pathways, is presented in the Risk
 Assessment Report.

 Current federal guidelines for acceptable exposures are a health Hazard Index equal to 1.0
 and an individual lifetime excess carcinogenic risk in the range of 10"4 to 10"6. Some of the
 on site soil and sediment risks fall within EPA's acceptable risk range.  However, EPA has
 determined that remedial action is necessary in these areas due to: the uncertainties as
 mentioned above,  the  contribution  of some  of the  chemicals to  the  ground water
 contamination,  and that unless these soils and sediments are remediated, they would
 continue to migrate off the facility property and accumulate which would likely result in an
 unacceptable risk to the public.

 Actual or threatened releases of hazardous substances from this Site, if not addressed by
 the preferred alternative or one of the other active measures considered, may present a
 current or potential threat to public health, welfare or the environment.

 REMEDIAL ACTION OBJECTIVES

 Remedial action objectives are specific goals to protect human health and the environment;
 they specify the contaminant(s) of concern, the exposure  route(s), receptor(s),  and
 acceptable contaminant level(s) for each exposure route. These objectives are based on
 available information  and  standards such as  applicable, or  relevant and appropriate
 requirements (ARARs) and risk-based levels established in the risk assessment.

The cleanup levels have been chosen for each area where  an unacceptable exposure risk
was  determined or from data which indicates that a disposal area  contributes  to the
 groundwater contamination. These cleanup levels are derived from the point of departure,
 as defined in the  NCP, of 1.0Q.X10"6 or a  Hazard Index of 1  and using the same risk
 modeling assumptions used in the risk assessment, thereby yielding a cutoff value below
which the ingestion of sediment at the Site is no longer a risk.

Soils and Sediments - The following remedial action objectives have been determined for
clean-up of soils and sediments at the Site.

Surface Soils (0 to 2 feet below ground surface) and Sediments

                          Unnamed Drainage Way and Mays Creek Soils/ -
	Facility Surface Soils/Sediments    Sediments
Semivolatiles (ppm)

Benzo (a) anthracene      20              3
Benzo(b)fluoranthene      20              3
Benzo (k)fluoranthene     43              7
Benzo(a)pyrene          3              1
lndeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene    12              2
                                        11

-------
 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene    3              1

 PCBs (ppm)           10              1


 Inorganics (pom)
 Arsenic               19              7
 Chromium               -            1110

 Cleanup levels are lower for the Unnamed drainage way and Mays Creek soil/sediment
 than for facility soils and sediment because there is a greater potential for residential
 exposure (as opposed to industrial exposure) in areas off the facility property.

 Subsurface Soils ( > 2 ft below ground surface)

 Facility Subsurface Soil

 Semivolatiles (pom)

 Benzo(a)anthracene     54
 Benzo(b)fluoranthene    55
 Benzo(k)flouranthene   118
 Benzo(a)pyrene         8
 lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene  33

 PCBs (ppm)           25

Inorganics (ppm)

Arsenic             52
The facility subsurface soils cleanup levels are higher than facility surface soils cleanup
levels because the potential for  human exposure to  subsurface soils is restricted to
occasional exposure to utility workers.
Soils and Sediments Which May Pose a Threat to the Aquifer

Analytical data from soils and sediment collected from Disposal Areas 6,10, and 5 indicate
that these areas may be contributing to the Site ground water contamination.  For these
areas, soils and sediments  will be analyzed  using the TCLP method to determine this
potential, and soils or sediments which do  not  pass this test will be  remediated.   In
addition, preliminary confirmatory data from the bottom of the excavation in drum removal
areas 1,2,3 indicate that a small volume of soils remaining  pose a threat to ground water
quality. These areas will be re-excavated, and confirmatory sampling will be re-conducted.
                                        12

-------
 Ground water

 Cleanup levels for ground water are established by federal and State laws and regulations.
 According to Rl data,  the aquifer beneath the Site  is contaminated with  a variety of
 chemicals.  The aquifer is designated by EPA as a Class Ha aquifer and New York State
 designates the aquifer as a class GA aquifer, or a potential source of potable water. This
 designation requires that applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs) for
 drinking water be met.  Cleanup levels are thereby driven by MCLs established by State
 and federal regulations. See Table 8. For example, the maximum concentration of the
 organic chemical TCE in ground water is 190 ppb, while the MCL for TCE for the aquifer
 is the NYSDEC standard of 5 ppb.  For chromium, an inorganic chemical, the maximum
 concentration in ground water at the facility is 1540 ppb, while the MCL for chromium is the
 NYSDEC standard of 50 ppb.
DESCRIPTION OF REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES

CERCLA requires that each selected site remedy be protective of human health and the
environment, be cost-effective, comply with other statutory laws, and utilize permanent
solutions, alternative  treatment technologies and resource recovery  alternatives to the
maximum extent practicable. In addition, the statute includes a preference for the use of
treatment as a principal element for the reduction of toxicity,  mobility, or volume of the
hazardous substances.

This Record of Decision evaluates in detail eight soil and sediment and two ground water
remedial alternatives for addressing the contamination associated with the Site. The time
to implement reflects only the time required to construct and/or implement the remedy and
does not include the  time required to design the remedy, negotiate with the responsible
parties,  if appropriate, or procure contracts for design and construction.
These alternatives are:
MEDIA 1 and 2: SOILS AND SEDIMENTS
Alternative 1 - No Action

Capital Cost: $ 0
Annual O&M Costs: $0
Present Worth: $ 0
Time to Implement: Could be implemented immediately.

The Superfund program requires that a "no action" alternative be evaluated at every site
to establish a baseline for comparison. Under this alternative, a public awareness program
concerning surface soil contamination would be implemented, including conducting public
                                       13

-------
 meetings and posting warning signs.  The Site would be reviewed every five years to
 evaluate the protectiveness of the remedy.
Alternative 2 - Access Restriction

Capital Cost: $9,750
Annual O&M Costs:$0
Total Cost: $9,750
Time to Implement: Approximately 6 months

This alternative consists  of deed restrictions to restrict future  uses of the  Facility to
industrial operation, to prohibit the extraction of ground water to be used as drinking water,
to provide maintenance  of the fences surrounding the facility,  including the unnamed
drainage way south of the facility, and to continue 24-hour security. The Site would be
reviewed every five years  to evaluate the protectiveness of the remedy.
Common Action for Sediment and Soil Remedial Alternatives

Six of the remedial alternatives evaluated for remediation of surface, subsurface soils and
sediment contain the common actions of removal and de-watering of sediment, consolida-
tion of soil, and product recovery, as described below:

1) Excavation of sediment from May's Creek, the Unnamed  Drainage way,  the North
drainage way, and Area 10 Lagoon. The sediment would be staged in one area and de-
watered.

2) Excavation of surface soils from Areas 6,7, and 8 and subsurface soil from the oil/water
separator and Area 4.

(Volume calculations of the amount of soils and sediments exceeding cleanup levels, which
were performed during the FS, indicate that an estimated 3,480 cubic yards of contaminat-
ed soil and sediment must be removed to reduce risks posed by the contaminated soil to
the 10"6  range.  In addition, it is estimated that 55 cubic yards of cadmium contaminated
soils must be removed from disposal Area 6 to remove the potential threat to ground water
posed by these contaminated soils.)

3} Confirmation sampling to ensure remediation goals are obtained.

4) Replacement of existing sediment and soil with clean fill.

5) Implementation of a free-product investigation and remediation program.  This program
will investigate the source  (likely to be contaminated soils) of the floating product detected
at monitoring well D-5, and following this study, source control and product recovery will
be performed.

                                       14

-------
 6) Access restrictions in the form of existing fences and facility security. This prevents
 inadvertent trespassing onto the industrial property.

 7) Collection of additional soil samples from Area 5 and analysis for TCLP. Based on the
 TCLP data, a RCRA cover pursuant to 40 CFR  Part 264  would be installed over the
 contaminated areas of Disposal Area 5. A fence with a gate would be placed around the
 disposal areas. If the volume of contaminated material is very small, EPA will consider off-
 site treatment and disposal of this material.

 8) Collection of additional samples from Area 4 so that wastes may be segregated for
 proper disposal of PCB-contaminated soils.

 9) Installation of a geotextile membrane under rip-rap in May's Creek.  This will be installed
 as a protective measure for aquatic species exposure to low levels of cadmium which have
 been detected.

 Alternative 3 - Consolidate Soil and Sediment. Install RCRA Cover

 Capital Cost: $913,094
 Annual O&M Costs: $14,300
 Present Worth of O&M: $134,849
 Total Cost: $1,047,943
 Time to Implement: 1 year

 The common actions described above would be completed prior to clearing vegetation and
 grading in a portion of the western half of the facility property selected for the disposal and
 capping.  The consolidated and de-watered sediment would be placed in this selected
 area.  A RCRA cover pursuant to 40 CFR Part 264 would be installed over the soil  and
 sediment. A  RCRA cover includes  two feet of  soil  capable  of  supporting  adequate
 vegetation, a six inch thick drainage layer or synthetic drainage net, a 60 mil geotextile
 membrane liner, non-woven geotextile, and a one-foot thick  layer of intermediate cover
 above consolidated soil and sediment. A fence with a gate and lock would be installed
 around the RCRA cover area.  Post closure care would include maintenance of the RCRA
 cover and restricting of facility operations in the area of the RCRA cover.

 Alternative 4 - Consolidate Soil  and Sediment. Stabilize. Install RCRA  Cover

 Capital Cost: $1,447,869
 Annual Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs: $14,300
 Present Worth of O&M: $134,849
 Total Cost: 1,582,718
Time to Implement: 1 year

The common actions described above except de-watering would be completed prior to
 clearing vegetation and grading in a portion of the western  half of the facility property
selected for the disposal of the stabilized material.  A treatability study would have to be

                                       15

-------
 conducted in order to determine the most effective stabilization agent. Stabilization agents
 include Portland cement, lime, cement kiln dust, and commercially available materials. The
 RCRA cover and fencing would be identical to that described for Alternative 3.
Alternative 5 - Segregate Soil and Sediment. Use Low Temperature Thermal Treatment.
Stabilize. Install RCRA Cover

Capital Cost:  $2,207,215
Annual O&M Costs: $14,300
Present Worth of O&M: $134,849
Total Cost: $2,342,064
Time to Implement: 2 years

The common actions as described above would be conducted. The soil contaminated with
inorganics in Area 7 would be segregated from the remainder of the excavated soil and
sediment. The Area 7 soil exceeds cleanup levels for metals (arsenic) but not for PAHs
and PCBs.  Soil and sediment would be treated using a low temperature thermal treatment
system. The excavated soil and sediment from Area  7  would then be mixed with  the
thermally treated material and would be stabilized following a stabilization treatability study.
An area in the western portion of the facility property would be selected for placement of
the consolidated soil, cleared of vegetation, and graded. The RCRA cover and fencing
would be identical to that described for Alternative 3.

Alternative 6 - Consolidate Soils and  Sediment. Dispose of Off-Site at Industrial Waste
  andfill
Capital Costs; $2,811,931
Annual O&M Costs: $0
Total Cost: $2,811,931
Time to Implement:  1  year

This alternative consists of all the common actions described above.  The excavated soil
and de-watered sediment would be staged in a central area. After consolidation, all the soil
and sediment would be transported to a RCRA approved industrial waste landfill.
                                       16

-------
 Alternative 7 - Consolidate Soil and Sediment. Build an On site RCRA-Disposal Landfill

 Capital Costs: $ 1,052,252
 Annual O&M  Costs: $14,300
 Present Worth of O&M: $134,849
 Total Cost: $1,187,101
 Time to Implement: 1 year

 This alternative consists of all the common actions described above.   An area in the
 western portion of the Facility property would be selected for construction of the on-site
 RCRA landfill  (approximately 10,340 square feet are required).  The on-site RCRA landfill
 would be constructed as follows:  a multi-liner would be constructed from top to bottom
 consisting of: 1 foot protective cover, non-woven geotextile, 60 mil- geotextile membrane,
 non-woven geotextile, 1-foot  drainage layer, non-woven geotextile, 60 mil- geotextile
 membrane, non-woven geotextile, 6" compacted sub-base. The liners would be designed
 and constructed to meet 40 CFR and NYS 6 NYCRR 373-2 requirements. The contaminat-
 ed soil would be placed over the liner and non-impacted soil would be placed between the
 contaminated soil and the RCRA cover. The RCRA cover and fencing would be identical
 to that described for Alternative 3.
Alternative 8 - Consolidate Soil and Sediment. Ship Off-site For Treatment and Disposal
Capital Costs: $ 2,462,334
Annual O&M Costs:$0
Total Costs: $2,462,334
Time to Implement: 1 year

This alternative consists of all the common actions described above.  The soil and de-
watered sediment would be staged in a central area. After consolidation, all the soil and
sediment would  be  transported to an approved treatment  and/or disposal  facility.
Treatment would be  conducted in  order to meet RCRA Land Ban Regulations.  This
alternative includes TSCA waste (PCBs > 50 ppm) disposal in a secure TSCA double lined
landfill facility (approximate volume 1,275 cubic yards). RCRA waste (e.g. PCBs < 50 ppm,
Arsenic > 5 ppm, Chromium > 5ppm) would be stabilized to prevent leaching of metals
and disposed of in a secured RCRA lined facility .(approximately 2,124 cubic yards as
determined as the reasonable likely quantity in the Feasibility Study), and non-RCRA wastes
would be disposed of in an industrial waste landfill (approximate volume 120 cubic yards).
Based  on soil estimates of 3000 to  6000 cubic yards,  approximately 150 to 300 trucks
would be expected to leave the facility.  The cost estimate  is based on the 2,124 cubic
yards and may vary depending on the final volume actually  excavated.
                                      17

-------
 MEDIUM 3: Ground Water

 Ground water analyses conducted during the Rl indicate that 14 organics and 7 inorganics
 are present in concentrations above cleanup levels at the facility.

 The ultimate goal of the EPA Superfund Program's approach to ground water remediation,
 as stated in the NCP (40 CFR Part 300), is  to return usable ground waters to their
 beneficial uses within a time frame that is reasonable.  Therefore, for this aquifer, which is
 classified by New York State as a potential drinking water source, the final cleanup levels
 will be federal and State drinking water standards. The remedial alternatives for ground
 water include no action and ground water treatment.
 Alternative 9  - No Action

 Capital Costs: $12,000
 Annual O&M  Costs: $14,300
 Present Worth of O&M: $134,849
 Total Costs: $146,849
 Time to Implement: At least 30 years

 As previously stated, the Superfund program requires that a "no action" alternative be
 evaluated at every site to establish a baseline for comparison.  Under this alternative, a
 public awareness program concerning ground water contamination would be implemented,
 including conducting public meetings and posting warning signs.  Institutional controls
 would be implemented to prevent untreated ground water use as a source of potable water
 at the Site. Long-term surface water and ground water monitoring would be included to
 track any contaminant migration. The Site would be reviewed every five years to evaluate
 the protectiveness  of the remedy.
Alternative 10 - Ground water Treatment

Capital Cost: $1,082,726
Annual O&M Cost: $153,419
Present Worth of O&M  (20 years): $1,305,596
Total Costs:$ 2,388,322
Time to Implement: Approx 20 years

This alternative involves the pumping and treatment of contaminated ground water with the
goal of achieving federal and state drinking water cleanup levels.  Treatment will consist of
air stripping  the extracted water to remove VOCs and, if necessary, metals removal by
either filtration or precipitation. Air emission treatment, if necessary, will be installed to meet
6 NYCRR Parts 200,201, and 212 regulations and New York State Air Guide 1. See Figure
9. The exact treatment specifications required will be determined during the remedial
design. Treated ground water will be discharged to the non-contact cooling system at the

                                       18

-------
 plant,  or to surface water in accordance with the State Pollutant Discharge Elirnination
 System requirements.  The costs are based  on pumping and treating 30 gallons per
 minute. It is possible that higher pumping rates will be required to contain and/or capture
 contamination in ground water at the facility. The exact pumping rate will be determined
 during the design stage.  Recent studies  have indicated that  pumping and treatment
 technologies may contain uncertainties in achieving concentrations required under Federal
 and State standards  over a reasonable period  of time.   However, these studies also
 indicate  significant decreases  in  contaminant concentrations  early  in  the  system
 implementation, followed by a leveling out.  For these reasons, this alternative stipulates
 contingency  measures, whereby the  ground water extraction and  treatment system's
 performance will  be monitored on  a  regular basis  and adjusted as warranted by the
 performance data collected during operation.  Modifications may include any or all of the
 following:

    a) at individual wells where cleanup goals have been attained, pumping may be
      discontinued;

    b) alternate pumping at wells to  eliminate stagnation points;

    c) pulse pumping to allow aquifer equilibration and to allow adsorbed contaminants to
      partition into ground water; and

    d) install additional extraction wells to facilitate or accelerate cleanup of the contaminant
      plume.

If it is determined, on the basis of the preceding criteria and the system performance data,
that certain portions of the aquifer cannot be restored to their beneficial use in a reasonable
time frame, all of the following measures involving long-term management may occur, for
an indefinite period as a modification of the existing system:

    a) engineering controls such as  physical barriers including trenches, source control
     measures, or long-term gradient control provided by low level pumping, may be
     implemented as containment measures;

    b) chemical-specific ARARs will be waived for the cleanup of those portions of the
     aquifer which cannot be restored based on the technical impracticability of achieving
     further contaminant reduction;

   c) institutional controls will be provided/maintained to restrict access to those portions
     of the aquifer which remain above cleanup levels;

   d) continued monitoring of specified wells; and

   e) periodic reevaluation of remedial technologies for ground water restoration.
                                       19

-------
The decision to invoke any or all of these measures may be made during a periodic review
of the remedial action, which will occur at intervals of no less often than every five years
after the initiation of the operation.

All costs and implementation times are estimated.
 Remedial design period is not included in implementation times.

SUMMARY OF COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES

During the detailed evaluation of remedial alternatives, each alternative was assessed
utilizing nine evaluation criteria as set forth in the NCR and OSWER Directive 9355.3-01.
These criteria were developed to address the requirements .of Section 121 of CERCLA to
ensure all important considerations are factored into remedy selection decisions.

The following "threshold" criteria are the  most important, and must be satisfied by any
alternative in order to be eligible for selection:

    1. Overall protection of human health  and the environment addresses whether or not
      a remedy provides adequate protection and describes how risks posed through each
      exposure pathway  (based on a reasonable maximum exposure scenario) are
      eliminated, reduced, or controlled through treatment, engineering controls, or institu
      tional controls.

   2. Compliance with ARARs addresses whether or not a remedy would meet all of the
      applicable, or relevant and appropriate requirements of federal and state environmen
      tal statutes and requirements or provide grounds for invoking a waiver.

The following "primary balancing" criteria are used to make comparisons and to identify the
major trade-offs between alternatives:

   3. Long-term effectiveness and permanence refers to the ability of a remedy to maintain
      reliable protection of human health and the environment over time, once cleanup
      goals have been met.  It also addresses  the magnitude and effectiveness of the
      measures that may be required to manage the risk posed by treatment residuals
     and/or untreated wastes.

   4. Reduction of toxicity, mobility, or volume through treatment  is the anticipated perfor
     mance of a remedial technology, with respect to these parameters, that a remedy may
     employ.

   5. Short-term effectiveness addresses the period  of time needed to achieve protection
     and any adverse impacts on human health and the environment that may be posed
     during the construction and implementation periods until cleanup goals are achieved.

   6. Implementability is the technical and administrative feasibility of a remedy,  including
    the availability of materials and services needed.

                                      20

-------
   7. Cost includes estimated capital and operation and maintenance costs,.and the
     present-worth costs.

The following "modifying" criteria are considered fully  after the formal public comment
period on the Proposed Plan is complete:

   8. State acceptance indicates whether, based on its review of the RI/FS and the
     Proposed Plan, the State supports, opposes, and/or has identified any reservations
     with the preferred alternative.

   9. Community acceptance refers to the public's general response to the alternatives
     described in the Proposed Plan and the RI/FS reports.  Factors of community
     acceptance to be discussed include support,  reservation,  and opposition by the
     community.

A comparative analysis of the remedial alternatives based upon the evaluation criteria noted
above follows.
Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment

Soils and Stream Sediments: All of the alternatives, with the exception of the no action
alternative and access restriction alternative (Alternatives 1 and 2), would provide adequate
protection of human health and the environment by eliminating or controlling risk through
containment, removal, or treatment.

Alternatives 1 and 2 are not an acceptable remedial option given that the current risk from
PAHs, PCBs, and inorganics posed by the Site exceeds the acceptable risk range of 10"*
to 10"6 in certain areas of the Site. Therefore, since Alternatives 1 and 2 do not meet this
threshold criterion, they will  not be discussed further in this section.

Ground water: Only the treatment alternative (Alternative 10) for ground water attempts
to provide adequate  protection  of human  health and  the  environment by  reducing
contaminant levels to cleanup levels. Although there is no current exposure pathway for
ground water use at the facility, the no action alternative is not protective
of public water supplies because it will not prevent the migration of contaminants within the
Newtown Creek Aquifer.  Consequently, and in accordance with EPA ground water policy
as set forth in the NCP, Site remediation is warranted to restore ground water to  its
beneficial use.  Therefore, since  Alternative 9 (no action) does not meet this threshold
criterion, it will  not be discussed further.

Compliance with ARARs

Soils and  Stream  Sediments:  Alternatives 3,4,5,6,7, and  8  provide containment  or
treatment as a means of eliminating potential exposures.
                                       21

-------
 Land Disposal Restrictions  (LDRs)  are  chemical- and  action-specific ARARs that are
 triggered by the placement of wastes regulated under RCRA. LDRs require that excavated
 hazardous wastes be treated to acceptable levels before land disposal.  For  non-listed
 wastes, on-site or off-site disposal of treated wastes is permitted provided the wastes are
 not, after treatment, RCRA  characteristic hazardous  wastes.   Soils in Area  6 contain
 hazardous waste and must therefore be treated so that the contaminants remaining in the
 leachate (as determined by TCLP) are less than the Toxicity Characteristic limit so as to
 no longer be considered hazardous waste and therefore be eligible for disposal. Area 5
 contains listed hazardous waste, and LDR restrictions would prevent any land disposal of
 these materials.  The  LDR  requirements, however are not triggered if the material is
 contained without excavation with a RCRA cover. Alternative 8 would meet Land Disposal
 Restrictions for all wastes while Alternatives 3 and 6 would not.

 One sample from Disposal Area 4 indicated PCBs  at a  concentration of 320 ppm.
 Therefore, the potential exists that additional soils and  /or sediments will be encountered
 with concentrations above 50 ppm.  For these sediments or soils, Alternative 8, which
 includes excavation, segregation and off site disposal in a TSCA regulated landfill, would
 meet TSCA ARARs.

 Alternative 7 would not meet New York State requirements as set forth at 6 NYCRR 373-2
 for all contaminated soil or sediments because ground water must be greater than 10 feet
 from a landfill's  cell bottom  and because the area proposed for the landfill is  a ground
 water recharge zone.  Perched ground  water was encountered  at 4-5  feet below the
 ground surface during drum excavation activities in Disposal Areas 1 and 2 and therefore
 this requirement cannot be satisfied.

 Other action-specific and location-specific  ARARs that are applicable or relevant and
 appropriate would  be met under the selected alternative (Table 9).  Examples include
 Occupational  Safety and  Health Administration  (OSHA)  Standards  for Hazardous
 Responses and New York RCRA Hazardous Waste Facility Requirements for the handling
 and storage of hazardous wastes.

 Ground water:  According to the federal site-specific  classification scheme, the ground
 water at the Site is Class 2A, which is potential drinking water.  New York State classifies
 the Site ground water "GA" which indicates that the underlying aquifer is a potential drinking
 water aquifer. Safe  Drinking Water Act (SDWA) MCLs are federal chemical-specific ARARs
 as are NYSDEC Class GA Ground water Quality  Standards.

 Alternative  10 attempts  to  meet these ARARs;  if  ARARs are  demonstrated  to be
 unattainable after implementation of a ground water extraction and treatment system, the
 contingency exists for a waiver of these ARARs, as outlined in the Summary of Alternatives
 section.

 Alternative 10, ground water treatment,  would also meet action-specific ARARs.  Location-
 specific ARARs that are applicable or relevant and appropriate would also be met under
the preferred alternative.  Examples include OSHA Standards for Hazardous Responses

                                       22

-------
 and New York State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (SPDES) Requirements for Site
 Runoff, Surface Water and Ground Water Discharge Limits (Table 9).
 Long-term Effectiveness and Permanence

 Soils and Stream Sediments: Alternative 8 would be both effective and permanent once
 the construction phase is complete because the potential risks posed by the contaminated
 soil and sediments would be removed and the contaminated soil areas would be restored
 to  ambient conditions.  Alternative 8 will result  in transporting additional material to an
 existing off-site disposal facility as opposed to  creating a new  disposal facility on-site,
 thereby restricting future uses of that on site piece of property.   Each of the remaining
 alternatives offer long-term effectiveness and some degree of permanence by removing the
 exposure pathway or treating the contaminated materials.

 Ground water:  Alternative 10 is effective and permanent in that the remedial goal is to
 achieve ARARs and the pumping  and  treatment would remove  the ground  water
 contamination and prevent further negative impacts to the Newtown Creek Aquifer.
 Reduction of Toxicity. Mobility, or Volume

 Soils and Stream Sediments:  Alternative 3 provides no reduction in toxicity or volume
 because of the absence of treatment, but it would reduce the mobility of contaminants in
 the soil because they would be contained and no longer exposed for transport by wind or
 water erosion.

 Alternatives  4  and 8 would reduce the  mobility  of  inorganic contaminants  through
 treatment.  These alternatives may increase the total volume of waste material.  No
 reduction in toxicity of contaminated soils or sediments would occur under Alternatives
 3,4,6, 7 or 8. Only Alternative 5 meets this criterion fully.

 Ground water:  Alternative 10, pumping and treatment, would contain the ground water
 contaminants thereby reducing mobility and the ability of contaminants to migrate into the
 Newtown Creek Aquifer.  The treatment process would reduce contaminant concentrations
 in the treated ground water to below surface water discharge standards and would have
the goal of reducing contaminant concentrations in the aquifer to below ARARs, effectively
 diminishing both toxicity and volume.

Short-term Effectiveness

Soils and Stream  Sediments: The short-term effectiveness of all the alternatives is high
since each alternative involves  relatively little construction and implementation. Although
the potential for dust release is higher for Alternative 8 than for on-site alternatives, this
alternative is neverthless effective in regard to this criterion.  Reliable technologies would
                                       23

-------
 be used in the excavation, treatment, transport, and consolidation phases to ensure that
 any dust releases would be minimized.

 Ground water: The short-term effectiveness of Alternative 10 is high since there is no
 exposure to contaminated ground water during implementation. Any short-term risks are
 derived from the potential of constructing and using a ground water well on site before
 institutional controls are in place, which is considered highly unlikely since the Site is
 provided with water from the town municipal system.  Implementation of Alternative 10
 would not result in any exposures through proper operational procedures.  The estimated
 time for implementation of the construction phase for the preferred alternative is 24 months,
 with a minimum of 20 years of monitoring to complete the remedial  action.
 Implementability

 Soils and Stream Sediments:  Alternative 3 is technically easy to implement, although it
 requires maintenance to remain effective.

 Alternative 8, excavation and off-site disposal after treatment, utilizes technologies that are
 readily implementable.  The equipment and personnel required for this alternative are
 readily available.  The removal of all surface soil and sediment will require approximately
 150 to 300 trucks leaving the facility.

Treatment alternatives 4 and 5 would require treatability studies to ensure effectiveness,
and Alternative 5 must be able to meet NYS air regulations prior to full scale operation.

Ground water: Alternative 10 uses standard equipment and well developed technologies
that are commercially available.  Treatment alternatives for the extracted ground water
would require  treatability testing during remedial design.  The small volume of residuals
from  the construction of this  alternative would  be transported  off-site  for disposal.
However, contingencies will be included to maximize the pump and treatment system's
effectiveness in realizing this goal.

Cost

Soils  and Stream Sediments:  Based on the Rl data and the FS evaluation, the cost of
treating soils and sediments to meet LDR's, prior to off-site disposal in an Industrial Waste
Landfill (Alternative 8) is not substantially higher than the cost of the on-site disposal and
treatment alternatives (Alternative 4 and 5).  The cost of off site treatment is higher than
construction of a  RCRA cell for treated wastes, but removal and treatment provides for
permanent removal of the contaminants.

The estimated  present worth cost of the selected Alternative #8 is $2,462,334. The present
worth costs for soil and sediment remediation ranged from $9,750 for Alternative 2  to
$2,811,931 for Alternative 6.
                                       24

-------
 Ground water: The actual cost of Alternative 10 could be considerably less depending on
 whether the contingency measures are invoked after initial implementation, or if EPA
 decides that the treatment system should be operated for more than 20 years.

 The thirty year present worth cost of the no action alternative is $146,849, while the twenty
 year (estimated time for remediation) present worth cost of the treatment alternative is
 $2,714,721.   Individual cost breakdowns are included in the  Summary of Remedial
 Alternatives section of this Proposed Plan.
State Acceptance

The State of New York concurs with the preferred alternatives presented-in this Record of
Decision.
Community Acceptance

The Public Comment Period on the Proposed Plan for the Site was held from May 27,1992
through June 27, 1992.  In addition, a Public Meeting was held at the Village of Elmira
Heights Village Hall on June  16, 1992 to discuss, answer questions about, and accept
comments on the Proposed Plan. No negative comments regarding EPA's Proposed Plan
were made by the public during the Public meeting.
SELECTED REMEDY

Based upon consideration of the requirements of CERCLA, the detailed analysis of the
alternatives,  and public comments,  both NYSDEC and EPA have  determined  that
Alternative 8: Consolidate  Soil and  Sediment, Ship  Off  site for Treatment  and
Disposal; and Alternative 10: Extraction/Air Stripping /Metals Precipitation and or
Filtration/Surface Water Discharge are the appropriate remedies for the Site.

The major components of the selected remedy are as follows:

  o  Excavation of contaminated soils and sediments from the Disposal-Areas identified
    in the Risk Assessment and where  soils and sediment pose a risk to ground water
     quality,

  o  Disposal of TSCA waste (PCBs >  50 ppm) in a secure TSCA double lined  landfill
    facility (estimated at approximately 1,275 cubic yards),

  o  Stabilization of RCRA waste to prevent leaching of metals and disposal in a secure
    RCRA lined facility (approximate volume 2,124 cubic yards),
                                      25

-------
   o  Disposal of non-RCRA wastes in an industrial waste landfill (approximate volume
     120 cubic yards),                                                     '

   o  Strategic placement of pumping wells to extract the contaminated ground water
     from the aquifer,
  o   Storage of pumped ground water in a central collection tank for subsequent
     treatment  in an above-ground system,

  o  Treatment of the contaminated ground water to meet Federal and State Standards
     for surface water discharge. Treated ground water would then be either discharged
     as effluent  to the facility non-contact cooling system or to a surface water
     discharge,

   o Recommendation that local institutional controls, in the form of local zoning
     ordinances, be  implemented in an attempt to control any future site use that could
     open an exposure pathway to subsurface soils,

  o  Recommendation that institutional controls will be provided/maintained to restrict
     access to those portions of the aquifer which remain above cleanup levels, and

   o Implementation of a long-term monitoring program to track the migration and
     concentrations of the contaminants of concern.

The ground  water  alternative  also stipulates  contingency  measures,  outlined  under
Alternative 10 in the Summary of Remedial Alternatives section of this Record of Decision,
whereby the ground water extraction and  treatment  system's performance  will  be
monitored on a regular basis and adjusted as warranted by the performance data collected
during operation.  If it is determined, in spite  of any contingency  measures that may be
taken, that portions of the aquifer cannot be restored to its beneficial use, ARARs may be
waived based on technical impracticability of achieving further contaminant reduction. The
decision to invoke a contingency measure may be made during periodic review of the
remedy, which will occur at intervals of no less often than every five years.

The selected alternative is believed to provide the best balance of trade-offs among the
alternatives with respect to the  evaluation criteria. Based on the information available at
this time, EPA believes the selected alternative would be protective  of human health and
the environment, would comply with ARARs, would be cost effective, and would utilize
permanent technologies to the maximum extent practicable. The preferred alternatives also
treat the most grossly contaminated material (surface soils, sediments, and ground water),
meeting the statutory preference for the use of a remedy that involves treatment as a
principal element.
                                       26

-------
 STATUTORY DETERMINATIONS

 Under its legal authorities, EPA's primary responsibility at Super-fund sites is to undertake
 remedial actions that are protective of human health and the environment.  In addition,
 Section 121 of CERCLA establishes several other statutory requirements and preferences.
 These specify that when complete, the selected remedial action for this Site must comply
 with applicable, or relevant and appropriate environmental standards established under
 Federal and State environmental laws unless a statutory waiver is justified.  The selected
 remedy  also must  be  cost-effective  and utilize permanent solutions  and alternative
 treatment  technologies or  resource-recovery technologies to the maximum  extent
 practicable. Finally, the statute includes a preference for remedies that employ treatment
 that permanently and  significantly reduce the volume, toxicity, or mobility of hazardous
 wastes, as  available. The following  sections discuss how the selected remedy meets these
 statutory requirements. The contingent remedy will also meet these requirements.
Protection of Human Health and the Environment

Once excavation and shipment off-site of sediment and soils with unacceptable levels of
contamination  is completed, the unacceptable risks posed by these materials  will be
permanently removed. The soils and sediments will be shipped off-site for treatment and
disposal, confirmatory sampling will be conducted in the excavated areas to ensure that
all unacceptably contaminated material is removed, and the  excavated areas  will be
covered with clean fill. In addition, EPA will recommend to local officials that institutional
controls be  implemented to prevent activities  at the facility from opening an  exposure
pathway to the subsurface soils.

After design and construction of a  ground water pump and treat system is completed,
contaminated ground water will be pumped in order to contain the facility ground water
contamination, and to restore  the  aquifer quality to appropriate  State and Federal
Standards for a Class Ha and GA  aquifer.  EPA will recommend to local officials that
institutional controls be implemented to prevent installation of a drinking water well in areas
effected by the contamiantion caused by releases at the facility.
Compliance with ARARs

At the completion of the response actions, the selected remedy will have complied with the
following:

Action Specific ARARs

Soils and Sediments -
6 NYCRR 373-1 Hazardous Waste Facility standards for permitting, 40 CFR 761 PCB Spill
Cleanup Policy, and RCRA Land Disposal restriction under 40 C.F.R. 268, 40 C.F.R. 261
                                       27

-------
 determination of whether a waste is hazardous, 40 C.F.R.262 Hazardous waste generator
 requirements, and 40 C.F.R. 263 Hazardous waste transporter requirements.

 Ground Water -
 Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) Maximum Contaminant Levels (40 C.F.R.  141.11-141.16)
 and 6 NYCRR Ground Water Quality Regulations (Parts 703.5, 703.6, 703.7) as well as NYS
 10 NYCRR 5, 10NYCRR  170 (State Public Drinking Water Standards and State Public
 Drinking Water Sources Standards, 6 NYCRR 750-757 State Pollution Discharge Elmination
 System. For air pollution control 6 NYCRR 200, 201, 211, and 212, as well as 6NYCRR 257,
 and NYS Air Guide 1 will have been considered.
Chemical-Specific ARARs:

Since the ground water at the Site is classified by EPAas lla (GA by NYSDEC), drinking
water standards are relevant and appropriate.  Again, these include SWDA MCLs and
6NYCRR Ground Water Quality Regulations. However, achieving chemical-specific ARARs
for ground water is dependent on remediation of the contaminant sources at the facility.
The remedial action is intended to result in attainment of chemical specific ground water
ARARs  providing that the  remedy is effective  in eliminating the sources of aquifer
contamination.

Other potential remedial action objectives are presented in Table 18.

Cost-Effectiveness

The selected remedy is cost effective and provides the greatest overall  protectiveness
proportionate to costs.  Excavation, segregation and shipment off-site for treatment and
disposal at a present worth of $2,462,334, is more expensive than some of the other
alternatives but  it does not result in the incurrence of the cost of treatability studies; also
it can be completed more quickly than these other alternatives at a reasonable cost. The
present worth cost of the ground water treatment and discharge (to the non-contact
cooling  system  or the surface water directly after treatment) is $2,388,322 based on
pumping and treating for 20 years and pumping and treating 30 gallons per minute.  This
alternative provides for containment of the contaminant plume and restoration of the aquifer
at the facility to  meet Federal and State standards at a reasonable cost.

Utilization of Permanent Solutions and Alternative Treatment Technologies to the Maximum
Extent Practicable

The selected remedy  utilizes permanent  solutions and treatment technologies to the
maximum extent practicable. The selected remedy represents the best balance of trade-
offs among the  alternatives with respect to the evaluation criteria.
                                       28

-------
Preference for Treatment as a Principal Element

The preference for treatment as a principal element is satisfied since treatment of the
principal threat (soil and sediment and ground water) will be conducted. The off-site
treatment of soil and sediment may include stabilization and incineration, if necessary, to
meet LDRs. For ground water treatment: filtration and/or precipitation, and air stripping
of contaminants will be utilized to attain ARARs.
DOCUMENTATION OF SIGNIFICANT CHANGES

There are no significant changes from the preferred alternative presented in the Proposed
Plan.
                                      29

-------
APPENDIX I




 FIGURES

-------
                                    Figures

Figure 1 - Site Location
Figure 2 - Facility Plan
Figure 3 - Ground Water Flow Direction
Figure 4 - Regional Ground Water Flow Direction
Figure 5 - Surface Water Flow at the Facet Facility
Figure 6 - VOC Concentrations in Ground Water
Figure 7 - Cadmium and Chromium Concentrations in Ground Water
Figure 8 - Regional TCE Concentration in Ground Water
Figure 9 - Ground Water Treatment System

-------

                     •o>  «•  \'
                                                   FACILITY LOCATION
                                               PUROLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY
                                                       ELMIRA. N.Y.
                                               PUROLATOR PRODUCTS
TAKEN FROM  USGS 7.8 MINUTE QUADRANGLES
ELMIRA AND HORSEHEADS. N.Y.

-------
Figure  2
                                                   HARK TWAIN MUNICHAL OOLF COURSE
                                                  Ot/WATIN
                                                  •fPAMATOM
          	Intermillenl Drainage Swale
            ~   Wetland
          :t11l: Railroad Tracks
                Facol Facility Dotirakiiy
Mx*tod tam f HU. I9QO3
lluilding
Dirllioad
Disposal Area
Standing Water
FACET ENTERPRISES

-------
Figure 3
                                                                                                                                           Go
                                                                                                                                            O
                                                                                                                                             o-
                                                                                                                     UONTTORMd WELL
                                                                                                                      ESTIMATED OROUNOWATER CONTOUR


                                                                                                                     GROUNOWATER FLOW DIRECTION
                           J	!	L
                           _J	U
                                                              PUROLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY
                                                                    ERM-Northeast
ESTIMATED GROUNDWATER


    CONTOUR MAP
                                                                                                              i':roo'

-------
Figure  4
                              SiNNSSfcWh'    .5

                                                               'X\\ CW3RHH.JBI
                                                                    rfirrTioifcwiOS *'
                                                                                          «'W-CW15S '••'.•"-*'
                         USGS OPENFILE REPORT 82-110
                         MYOROGEOLOGY OF THE VALLEY-FILL
                         AQUIFER IN THE ELMIRA AREA.
                         CHEMUNG COUNTY. N.Y.
                         AND FLOW DIRECTION IFEET MSD


                   U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

                              AGENCY
                  KENTUCKY AVENUE WELLFIELO SITE
                      GROUNOWATER ELEVATIONS

                        DECEMBER 13-1$. 1988
                    EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED
                                                   SOUKCE: USDS. HOKIEMEAOI. llri 4 ILUIRA. 1I«I OUAOKANOLC^ .

-------
SNuauvd MOU aovNivua AJJIDVJ
      6NV3UXG -««


       S3H31ia •«.



    MOld 133H6 O


          ON3O31

   0§
   22 ^
   Qo


-------
I
     Figure 6

                                                                        '
                                           =D r >r,'K is
                                                                                                                       LEGEND

                                                                                                                     ESTIMATED TOTAL VOLATILE
                                                                                                                     ORGANIC COMPOUNDS I3OCON
                                                           «UMf V IUMA iCOin
                                                                                                                    MOMTORMQ WQ1

                                                                                                           — —•. — •   INFERREO
                                                                                                             ESTIMATED TOTAL VOLATILE
                                                                                                            ORGANIC COMPOUNDS ISOCON3
                                                                                                            BASED OH 1»»0 OROUHOWATER DATA
                                                                                                                                       10-

-------
Figure  7
                                                                                                                  NORTH
                                                                                                                    e
                                                                                                                     GO
                                                                                                                     C*L C£
                                                                                                                     00
                                                                                                                     o
                                                                                                                     o-
                                                                                                  LEGEND


                                                                                                  Cd: CADMIUM CONCENTRATION (ppb)


                                                                                                  Cn CHROMIUM CONCENTRATION (ppb)


                                                                                                  NO: NOT DETECTED


                                                                                                  9 MOWTORMO WELL
                                                                                      CADMIUM AND CHROMIUM CONCENTRATIONS


                                                                                          IN GR^UNDWATER (UNFILTERED)


                                                                                        BASED ON 1900 GROUNDWATER DATA
                                                                                          PUROLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY
                                                                                                                   l':20O'
                                                                                                                  DAT!
                                                                                                                   10/90

-------
 Figure 8
                                                             0107534
                                    62 MW3S
                                    120 MW3D
                                              f"/' FUMT'IV:
                                             i'^Jswrifc
                                   SCALE
                                                      POOR QUALITY
                                                         ORIGINAL
   LEGEND:

   •—• AQUIFER BOUNDARY

     22   CONCENTRATION OF TCE
         IN ppb, JANUARY 1990

   NOTE:  NYSDEC WELLS WERE INSTALLED
         BY CLEAN HARBORS INC.,1989.
SOURCE: USQS. MORSEHEAOS. 1978 & ELMIRA, 1*69 OUAORANQLE
 U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
           AGENCY
KENTUCKY AVENUE WELLFIELD SITE
       TCE DISTRIBUTION IN
SULLIVAN STREET MONITORING WELLS
           (NYSDEC)
                                            EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED

-------
   ""i'.v_: re 9
 Ca(OH),
                        • o*
  • o
o* .  •
                       loop p «QOP
                   1ST RECARBONATION
           1ST  STAGE
           TREATMENT
     INFLUENT
EFFLUENT
                                                           LAMELU
                                                           SETTLE??
                                           r
                                           ft
                      Na,CO,
          2ND STAGE
          TREATMENT
                                                    POLYMER
                                                       I
SAND
FILTER
                                                  2ND RECARBONATION
                        POLYMER MIX TANK
                          (IF NEEDED)
                                                               imc
                                                                  PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM
                                                                  METALS REMOVAL SYSTEM
                                                                 GROUND WATER TREATMENT
                                                                PREPARED FOR
                                                                PUROLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY

-------
  Figure 9 contd.
                                        AIR EMISSIONS
                                                STACK HEIGHT:
                                                    JO FT
            METALS REMOVAL SYSTEM
               SEE FIGURE 4-8
             PROCESS FlOW DIAGRAM
                            \
GROUND WATER
  RECOVERY
   SYSTEM
              GROUND WATER
              PUMP STATION
TREATED WATER
  DISCHARGE
                                                                         GROUND WATCT THEATMBOT
                                                                         SCHEMATIC FLOW DIAGRAM
                                                                     HPHOtOt
                                                                       PUROLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY
                                                                                              NIB

-------
APPENDIX II




  TABLES

-------
                                                             TABLE  1
                                                             TABLE  ,
                                                 VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                        AREA I AND AREA 2 SOIL BORING SAMPLES

                                              VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
                                                1990 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION

                                              PUKOLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY



                                                 StUi1:6-a
TCL Compound                   SBS:4<   SBV68   (SB5:6*Dup.|   585:6-10  566 6 B   SB6:6 10  SB6 6 10  SB9:4fi   589:6-6   SB12:4<  SB12:6<  5B12:I

Acetone                          7J       6J         8J          «J—        _-.      _gj___
1.1-tXchtoroelhani                   1J
1.2-OlcNoroetheni                   12       5J         —           6       —        —       —      —       —
1.1.1-TrteMoroetherw                 2J       —         —           -       —        —       —               —                —
TikNoroethene                    110       69         12          53       3J        4J               -       -        12       30       42
Benzene                         -•        --         •-•           —       —        —       2J      ...       _        _       _
Tetrachtofoettiene                  —        —         —           —       -••        —               1J       —        —       —
Notes:    At concentriUont In mtoogrimi per Uogram (uoAg - pwls per Mkm (ppb)).
         No voMte orgMk compoundi (Mr* detected ki 586:4-6. 587:4-6.587:6-6. 587:6-10.
         588:4-6. 586^6. 589:6-10. 5810:4-6. SB10:6A 5810:6-10. S811:4«. 5811:6-6.5811:6-10.
         5813:0-2. 5813:2 4. end 5813:4«
—   -    Compound not detected kitNsMmple. but present In anotlier.
J    •    Semt-qumtltatlve due to concentration below Contract Required Ouanillatlon Until (CROL).

-------
                                                           TABLE 1  contd.


                                                               TABLE'
                                                     VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                             AREA I AND AREA 2 SOIL BORING SAMPLES
                                               SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
                                                    1990 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
                                                  PUROLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY
TCL Compound

2 Methytoaphthalene
Phenanthrene
Fkioranlhene
Pyrene
Benzo(a)Anihracene
Chrysene
Benzo(b)Fhjoranlhene
Benzo(k)Fhiroanlhene
Benzo(a)Pyrene
Di-n-Butylpfithalaie
Bb(2 ElhythexyOphthalale
                 SB5I66
SB5:4<  SB5:64  (SB5:6 6 Pup I
SB5:8 10 SB7:6 6 SB7:9 10 SBtO B 10
                                                       SB12:6-6 SB12:B 10    SB13:0 2 SBt3:2 4 SBI3:4 6
                                                                    B6J     —
                                        51J
                             53J
                                                    74J
84J
tOOJ
B4J
66J
66J
130XJ
130XJ
51J

72J
                                                                                    56J
                 44J
TIC Compounds

Total Unknowns
Total Unknown Hydrocaibons
2H-1 Benzopyran-2-one
UHBenzoduorene
Mono(2 Ether)Hexanedioic Add
Trimdhythexane
  230J    240J
240J
                                             230J    230J
                                 140J
47SOJ
3820J
 190JN
 300J
                                                        190 JN
                                                                    300J    -
Notes:   AH concentrations In mtcrograms per Mogram (ug/kg = parts per bWon (ppb)).
        No semi-volatile organic compounds were delected In SB6:4 6. SB6:64. SB6:8 10, SB7:46.
        SB8:4«. SB8:6fl. SB8:6-10, SB9:4«. SB9:64.  SB98 10. SB10:4«.  SBtO6^1, SB11:46. SB11:6 10. and SB12:4«.
     -   Compound not detected In this sample, but present in another.
J    •   Semi-quantitative due to QA/QC criteria outside of control limits, value below Contract Required Ouanlilalion Limit (CROL) or compound being a TIC.
X    »   Identifies coeKitkig Indistinguishable isomers.
N    -   Identified TIC.

-------
                                                                    TABLE   1  contd.

                                                                   TABLE  -i
                                                       VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                            AREA I  AND AREA 2 SOIL BORING  SAMPLES
                                                            METALS AND CYANIDE
                                                     1990  REMEDIAL  INVESTIGATION
                                                   PIIROI.ATOR  PRODUCTS COMPANY
AnaMe

Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
BeryMum
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Tin
Zinc
Cyanide

Anatyt«

Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
DCf JflPUIH
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Mcket
Tin
Zinc
Cyanide
              565:46    565:6-8
107OOJ
  9.2
 91.6J
   .•JOB
 S7.3J
2410J
1170J
  98J

 792

 242J
10400J
  5.2
 9B.4J
   .590
 77.9J
 224J
 62/J
  9.3J

 2S.S

 17SJ
 5851:68
(SB5: 6< Oup.1

  8790J
    7.0
   64.3J
    .428
   73.BJ
   2I5J
   63.4J
   10.2J

   23.4

   174J
    18
                                               SB5:8 10  566:46   566:68    566:810  567.4-6    567:68   567:8-10  SBB:4-6    568:68   SB8:6 10   SB9:4 6
B71OJ
  16
 84.3J
   460
 3!i1J
 548.1
 532.1
  B.ai

 379
15 I

9.7
 .12J
21.9
         14.7
8.5
                    16.9
                                  442J
                                   3.O
 26.3

  92

 17.0

 60.1
                                   634      590


                        SU 10:6-8  5610:8-10  SBIMfi  5611:6-8
                   43.4
                   24.1J
                                       296
                                                                         81.3
          53.1
          27.2.1
                                                329
                                                6SS
                                                 1.2
                                                                                           7740
                                               639
                                                 .306
          18.1
          20.2J
                                                          22.1

                                                          68.6
        13600J
          7.0J
         129J
          .516
         11.8
         96.6J
         30.4J
         10.8

         27.8

         139J
       11300J
         7.6J
         9S.4J
          .416

         49 6J
         25 8J
         g.a

         263

         81 5J
                                                                11SOOJ    7170
                                                                  5.7J      41.1
                                                                  95.4J     604
                                                                   .388      .316
50.4J
26.1J
11.4

30.2

87.2J
12.5
20.9J
                                                                                     22.7

                                                                                     67.2
                                                                                          5612:6-6  5612:810 5613:02  5613:2-4  5613:4-6
                                 17500     12900     8870
                                   4.0J       3.8J      37J
                                  132        99.6     100
                                    .546       .536      .376
  158J
  9 IJ
  9.3J

  23.0
  4.7U
  63 5J
  20 OJ
  11 OJ
  11 8J

  27.1

  92.4J
  18.5
  219.1
  31.1

  66.2
 25.8
 302.1
 382

 105
 19 tt
 24.6.1
 330

 94.5
16.7
21.2J
243

692
9600
  6.7J
 151
  .326

 14.4
 73.8J
 308

 78.2
10800    20100
  4.0J      8.9.1
 1S1      152
  .356     .776
          776
  166     113
  20.2.1    42.7.1
 256

 702
436

137
         8760
          3.7J
          77.1
           .338
          2.7
          67.3
          21.4J
32.2

88.7
                                                                                                    15900
                                                                                                             14900
                                                                                                                       17500
          7.8J       88J     —
         125       162      145
           .578      .548      .756
         -        16.8     —
         100       545       25.1
          26. IJ     81.4J     32.SJ
          10.4      -
29 d I

81.2
                                                                                            780
                                                                                                              137
                                                                                                               7.0
                                                                                                     322
                                                                                                               803
                                                                                                               38
                                                                                                                       12100
                                                                                                                        11.5J
                                                                                                                        989
                                                                                                                         .386
                             185
                             27.3J
          316

          87.0
Notes:     Al concenhiHom are In mMgrams per klogram (mg/kg - puils per mnon (ppm)).
     >    Analyle not detected n IMs tampta but present ki another.
J    -    Semi-quantitative due to QAAX requirements.
8    -    Value Is above Instrument Detection Umlt (IOI). tint licit iw Cunliutl HennheO Detection Umll (CROL).

-------
                                        TABLE 2
                                        TABLE 2
                               VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                              AREA 3 SOIL BORING SAMPLES
                             VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
                              1990 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
                            PIIROLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY
                                        SB50:2-4
TCL Compound            SBI:2-4       (SBI:2-4 Pup.)       51)2:8-10        SB4:6-8

Acetone                    —            —               9J               —
1,2-Dichloroelhene          —            3J                —              —
2-Hulanone                 6J             ---               ---              2J
Trichloroelhene             2J             —               —              —
Toluene                    ---            ---               2J


Notes:        All concentrations in micrograms per kilogram (ug/kg - parts per billion (ppb)).
             No volatile organic compounds were detected in SB 1:4-6, SBI:8-IO, SB2:2-4, SB2:4-6,
             SB3:2-4, SB3:4-6, SB3:6-8, SB4:2-4, and SB4:4-6.
—  m       Compound not detected in this sample, but present in another.
J    -       Semi-quantitative due to concentration below Contract  Required Quantitation Limit (CRQL).

-------
                                                               TABLE 2  contd.



                                                               TABLE
                                                    VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                   AREA 3 SOIL BORING SAMPLES
                                              SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
                                                   1990 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
                                                 PIIROLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY


                                            SB5024
TCI Compounds                  SB1:2-4     (SBt:24 Pup)    SBI:B-10    SB2:23      SB3:24  SB3:46      SB3:66      SB4:2~4     SB4:46      SB466

Benzole Add                      -                           -          —          -      -          -          67J
Penlachlorophenol        '         —             •••            —     .     —          —      •••          —          66J
Fkioranlhene                      50J           -            -          —          —     '-          ~          —
Pyrene          '                45J           •••            —          —          —      • ••          —
Benzo(a)Anlhracene                48J           ••-            —          —          —      —          ~
Bis(2 Elhylhexyt)phinatale            -             40J           -          —          -      ..-          68J         —          -          52J
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene              69XJ          -            - -          -          -                 _____
Benzo(V)Fluoranthene              69XJ          —            —          —          —      ...___


TIC Compounds

Total Unknowns                  2600J          13SOJ         220J      3760J       620J   2640J       590J        -          250J
Total Unknown Hydrocarbons        1220J          I650J         -         3240J       -     430J        —          -          _          _
Total Unknown Aldehydes            240J                          -          -          ......•_          _          _          _
Decane                          -                           -          -          150JN   -- -          -          -          -          -
Octadecanal                      -             -            -          -          -     360JN       -          —          -          -



Notes:   Al concentrations In micrograms per Mogram (ug/kg * parts per bMon (ppb)).
        No semi-volatile organic compounds were detected In SB1.46.
     m  Compound not detected hi this sample, but present In another.
J    •  Semi-quantitative due to QA/QC criteria outside of control limits, value  below Contract Required Ouanlitalion Limit (CflQl) or compound being a TIC.
X    -  Identities coduting Indistinguishable bomers.
N    •  Identified TIC.

-------
                                                               TABLE 2  contd.
                                                               TABLE
                                                   VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                  AREA 3 SOIL RORING SAMPLES
                                                                 METALS
                                                 1990  REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
                                               PIIROLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY
Anaryte

Aluminum
Arsenic
Balkan
BeryMum
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Zmc
          SB50:24
SB1:24   (561:2-4 Pup I   581:4 li   !iUI:B 10  SB2:2-3   562:3-4
                                                                                    SB3:24    583:46   563:64
                                                                                                              584:2-4   SB4:4<   SB468
13600      129001       12700
   7.3J       3.4J         a 4.1
  147       103          505
   .458      .288          479
             1.5J          1.3J
  265        29.9         4/5
  27.9       243J         33 4
  14.9        41. U        12.4

  26.S        284         214
  889       27BJ         805
IOBOOJ
58
74 3J
S.1B
IJ3J
4C*J
1431
1I.M

938
2b6J
16100
55J
174
.556
S0.7J
2110
270
180
.14J
S76
209
15400
60.1
33.38
.438
S7J
664
231
117
...
253
73.7
                                                         10900J    13300J
 4.S
6631
 .588

22. U
12.2J
 9.SJ

301
84 5J
165
  .498

 16.7
 4.JO.I
 15.9

 267
 73.6J
15800J
   56
  92 at
   .728
  17.6J
   52BJ
  16.4J

  263
  81.U
                                                                                    10000J
                  70.4
           152
11.7
27.S
76.4J
                                                                                             15000J   13000J
152
  .488

 19.3

 21.6

 12.7
 78.1J
121
 .388

 15.9

 14.9

 292
 M.9J
13500
  4.8J
 128
   .448

  17.Z
  247
  12.4

  259
  74.4
Note*:    At canccnlfallom «r« In mMgrams pa ktogiani (ing/kg - parts pet mWan (ppm))
         Cyanide was not dMactad h any ol VMS* samples.
—   •    Anatylt not dettcUd In W» sample but present m another.
J    •    Seml-quanmatJvt due to QAAX requirements.
B    •    Value Is above mstrument Delecflon Limit (ItM |. but below Contract Required Detection UrnM (CHOL).

-------
                                                                TABLE  3  r
                                                  .   VALID ANALY.  ^AL  RESULTS
                                                    AREA 4 SOIL BOKING SAMPLES
                                                   VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
                                                    1990 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
                                                  I'llROLATOK  PRODUCTS COMPANY
TCL Compounds

1.1-Dfchloroethane
Chloroform
2-Butanone
Benzene
Toluene
Elhyibcnzune
Xytenes
SB21:10 14
  2IOJ
  520J
  760J
SB22.9 H    SU2369

              1J

             29J
              3J
              7
              9
  3J         47
             SB32:6 9
           1SB23:6 9 Pup.)
              B40J
                 SB23:910    SB24:3 5
                                                                       3J
                                            4J
                                                                                  SB24:11 15
                                                        SJ
                                                        4J
TIC Compounds

Total Unknowns
Total Unknown Hydrocarbons
Unknown Sub. Cydohexane
Oecane
Dimelhyl Cydohexane
Dimethyl Cydopenlane
Dimelhyl Nonane
Dimethyl Octane
Elhylmethyt Benzene
Elhytmelhyl Heptane
Heptane
Methyl Cydohexane
Methyl Nonane
Methyl Propyl Cydohexane
Propytheptanol
Trimelhytoenzcne
Trlmelhyl Octane
 7000J
 13600J
 4000J
 4300JN
 4000J
 3300JN
 5900 JN
 4000J
  13J
                 B.5J
  I8JN
220J
 180J
 160J

1570J

 360J

 450JN
 390J
 5BOJ
 320J
35300J
2B600J
12000J
                          5900J
                          tOOOOJ
                   23J


                   1BJN



                   13J
Notes: AN concentrations In mJcrograms per klogram (ug/kg « parts per biRkm (ppb)).
      No votalle organic compounds were deteded In SB22:I1 13. SB22:13 15. SB23:11 13.  SB24:03. SB2524. SB25:46. andSB25:6«.
      Compound not detected In this sample, but present In another.
J     Semi-quantitative due to QA/QC criteria outside ol control limits, value below Contract Required Quanlilalion Limit (CRQL) or compound being a TIC.
N     Identified TIC.

-------
                                                                               TABLE  3  contd.
                                                                 AREA 4 SOIL L     aNG SAMPLES
                                                          SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC  COMPOUNDS
                                                              PUROLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY
TCt Compound

Napthalena
2-Metrtykiaphthalene
Acenaphthene
Dtoenioluran
Fkjoiena
Phenanltecne
Anthracene
» n-Butylphthalate
Fkxxanthene
Pyretic
Benzo(a)Anlhracern
Ctvysenc
Bh(2 Elhyt
Dt nOclyl PWhatate
Bnuo(b)Fkjor*nnwnc
B«KO(k)Fluoc«nlhen*
                                       SB 72:9- 11
 670J
1400
                            4:«IJ
                           ItOO
                           670
                                          44J
                                          47J
                                          85J
                                         190XJ
                                         190XJ
                                                      SB??:I? U
                                                        48.1
                                                        44.1
                                                        40J
                                                       111) I
                                                                    SB??:14 li
                                                                                   SB?3:6 9
                                                          78OJ
                                                          MOJ
                                                          IrtWJ
                                                          4WW
                                                          10HOJ
                                                          580J
                                                          49TIO
                                                          76(10
                                                          7300
                                                          2100.1
                                                          970J
                                                          3
                930J

               4MXI
               J9W
               3300
               79OO
                                                                                                                     SB?3:9 10
                                                                                                                       56J
                                                                                                                      170J
                                                                                                                                   SB7311 13      SB?4:35
                                                                                                                                                                SB7V4-6
                                                                                                                       6JJ
                                                                                                                                      45J
                                                                                                                                                    73J
lndeno( 1.7.3 td)Prrene
Ot>eiuo(a.h)AnU»acefM
Bento(g.h.l)Pery*ptadeean«
Hexalrlaconlam
lron.Tilcarbonyl|N |Phenyt)|
Methyl Tildccane
N-Ptopyl-Benzamldc
Ttlramelhyl Bcrucne
Telramelhylhepladccane
2.6.10.14-
Telramethylpenladccane
Undecylcyclone>ane
441OOJ
99900J
                          57OOJ
                          BTOOM
                          6200J
  S390J
2100OJ
                                        390OJN
                                        44OOJN
                                                        7700J
                                                      17900J
                                                       IMOJ
                                                       813OJ
                                                                     740J
530J
                                                        143600J
                                                        1640001
                                                                                                    47OOXJ
                                                                                                    700OJ
                                                                                                     B5OJ
                                                                                                     360J
             1450OOJ
             211000J
                                                                                                  74000J
                                                                                   _
                                                                                   20TJOOJN
                                                                                   21000JN
                                                                                                                      4SOOJ
                                                                                                                     14SOOJ
                                                                                                                     17500J
                                                                                                                      1100JN
                                                                                                                      2100J
                                                                                                                      3ODO.I
                                                                                                                     1100J
                                                                                                                                                    J610J
                                                                                                                                                                  46OJN
Notes:  Al conccnliatlons are In mtcrograrns per tier (ug/t - parts pei bMion (ppb|)
       No aeml-vokilie organic compound* were detected ki 5823:0-3. S874:1 Mb. 5875:6-6.
—  -  Compound not present hi tNs sample but present ki another.
J   -  Semi-quantitative due to concentration below Contract Requkud duiillkitlon Limit (CROL). data validation requirements » cunipuund being a TIC.
N   -  Identified TIC.
X   -  Identities codutkig Indistinguishable Isomers.

-------
                                                    TABLE 3 contd.
                                           VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                          AREA 4 SOIL BORING SAMPLES
                                           PESTICIDE/PCII COMPOUNDS
                                          1990 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
                                         PIIKOLATOU PRODUCTS COMPANY


                                                                                       SB32:6-9
TCL Compound        SB2I:IO-I4      SD22:9-H        SB22:12-I3       SB23:6-9         (SB23:6-9 Duo.)     SB23:9-IO

Arochlor 1248            I3000C         780              140            35000C           28000C
Arochlor 1254             —           ---              —            —               —                190
Notes:        All concentrations in micrograms per kilogram (ug/kg - parts per billion (ppb».
             No pesticide/PCB compounds were detected in SB22:I3-I5, SB23:11-13, SB24:0-3, SB24:3-5.
             SB24:II-IS, SB25:2-4, SB2S:4-6, and SB25.6-8.
—.  -       Compound not detected in this sample, but present in another.
C    -       Value confirmed by GC/MS Analysis.

-------
                                                                   TABLE  3  contd.
                                                         VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                        AKEA 4 SOIL BORING SAMPLES
                                                             METALS AND CYANIDE
                                                        1990 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
                                                      PUROLA TOR PRODUCTS COMPANY
                                                                5832:69
Anatyte
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
BetyNum
Cadmium
Ctwomkjm
Copper
lead
r Mercury
.•':. Nkket
I'."' tin
2mc
Cyanide
5621:1014
13600J
_.
16 6J
628J
.648
322
851J
22IJ
1J3
1.9J
2T3
...
11601
S7.S
5622:911
281001
...
B6J
272J
1.1B
2.3
40.9J
40. U
12.9J
.28J
60.1
_
141J
1.7
5822:1213
16000
—
3.9J
135
.558
4.5
31.9J
11.1
13.1
—
44.2
—
108J
2.9
5622:14 15
7480
9.9BJ
39J
91.7
.348
...
12 BJ
154
7.9
...
19.5
—
48.2J
—
SB2J:6 9
2OOOOJ

96J
II10J
.908
476
12MI
382J
235
2.2J
386
528
2590J
38.5
15823:6 9 Pup >
215OO
I13DJ

553
I.OB
IbO
482J
146
88.0
1.7
159

962J
29.1
5623:910
22900J

14. U
278J
.988
440
137J
66 9 J
28 OJ
94J
796
...
293.1
18.2
5623:11-13
14600J
...
145J
150J
518
1116
476.1
29 8J
193J
.24J
38.3
•-
126J
25
5624:0-3
14600J
-.
47J
139J
.658

213J
22.3J
11.4J
.27J
29.7
—
84 BJ
—
SB24:35
13SOOJ
—
3.0J
84.1J
.598
...
18.6J
I8.3J
12.SJ
.36J
24.0
—
73.9J
—
5624:11 15
24400J
—
12.3J
202J
.998
...
3S.4J
40 7 J
17 6J
33J
48.0
—
154J
1.0
5625:2-4
13700J

74J
817J
.588
...
194J
20 5J
136J
.31J
27.4
—
75 7J
—
5625:4-6
19200J

97J
194J
.758

29. U
33. U
14 4J
22J
430
—
104J
—
5625:6-8
27100J

8.2J
252J
1.18
...
32 JJ
28. U
16 BJ
.26J
52.1
—
. 105J
—
Notes:   At concentrattom ate ti mMgrnnt per Mogram (mg/kq - parts per mMon (ppni))
—   -   AnatyU not delected kithbtampte but praa*nl ki anottwr.
J   •   Semt-quartlUllve due to QAAK requkemenl*.
B   •   Value Is above Instrument Defection Urn* (101). but below Contract Rcujmud Uulu-cllon limit (CRDL)

-------
                                    TABLE  3 contd.
                                    TABLE 6-9
                          VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                    SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS,
                              PESTICIDES AND PCBs
                                  SOIL SAMPLES
                         1986 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
                       PUROLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY
 Compound

 PCB-1016
 PCB-1248
 PCB-1254
 PCB-1260
 4-Methylphcnol
 Naphthalene
 2-Methylnaphihalene
 Flurorene
 Phenanihrene
 Anthracene
 Di-n-butylphthalate
 Fluoranthene
 Pyrene
 Benzo (a) Anthracene
 Chrysene
 Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
120
      24000  —
            230
-kg"
290
3130 J --
      150
                                     LJ.    D-12-S    SB-31-7
53
110
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
• —
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
—
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
—
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
—
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
—
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
—
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA -
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
—
96J
170
140 J
83 J
605
190
230
550
350
250 J
370
...
                                                     3600 J
                                                     800 J
NOTES:       All concentrations in parts per billion (ppb).
      =      Compound not detected in this sample, but present in another.
NA   =      Compound not analyzed for in this sample.
J     =      Semi-quantitative value due to QA/QC data validation requirements or value below CRQL.
*     =      L-8 is a duplicate of L-4.
                                       6-34

-------
                                                                                 TABLE  %  -

                                                                     VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                                    AREA S SOIL BORING SAMPLES

                                                    VOLATILE ORGANIC AND PESTICIDE/I'CB COMPOUNDS
                                                                   1990 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION

                                                                  I'llROLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY




TCtVOC                SB14:13   SB14:35  SBt4:6-B  5615:13  5615:3545     SB 15:4 5  SB16 4 6  SBU:24  SB17:S 1  5617:8 10  SBlB:1-3   5618:44  5618:68  5B19:2 4  5619:46  5620:4 «  S6?0:B 5 1U

Carbon Usulflde             -       -       -       -        -                     -       -       -         -       4J       -       1J       —       -
I.l-Olcltoroelhane           •••       -       -       -                              —       —       —                 4J       5.1
1.2-achtoroelherw           —       —       —       -••        5U                     —       —       '—         -.        UO       no
1.1.1-TrtoNoroethane         —       —       —       —        10           -        —       2J
Trkhkxoethene             4J       3J       2J       /        240U         27        3J       -       -         2J       14       19      -       3D       2J       1J        2J
Toluene                   —       —       -       -        ~           -        -       SJ       —         --       _._.____
Einrtoenzene               —       ••-       —       —        -•-           —        —       I        —         ..._.__       —       —       _        —
Slyrene                   —       —       —       —        •••           ••-        —       U       —         .._.       —       ____
Xvlenea                   •--       •••       *••       —        •••           •••        —•       2J       -••         • -•—-       —       —       „___        	


TICVoloMes

ToM Unknowns             -       —       -       -        16J          -        -       35.8J     140J             24S.1J      -       23J      —       -       -        —
Total Unknown Alcohols       -       -       -       -        -           -        -       -       -         -       -       —       31J      —       —       —


TCI Pesllchte/PCB

Arochtor1248              -       -       -       -        580         -        -       -       -                 1500      '___.__
Atochtot 1254              310      —       —       —        —           -        —       —       —        •-•        —       —       —       _.__.




Moles:    AI concentrations we ki mlcrogiwns per Mogrim (ug>g • p«rt» per bIMon (ppb)).
         No volatle o»g«nk «nd pestlcMe/PCB compounds were detected In SBIbfl 2. SB 16:2 4. 5619:6 8. md SBM 6 8.
—  -     Compound not present In INs sample, but present In another.
J   -     Semi-quantitative due to QA/OC criteria outside of control Imlts. value bHnw Contract Required Quantltatton Umtt (CRQL) or compound being u TIC.
8   »     Contamination found In associated blank. Sample value h greater then 111 times Hie associated blank value
E   •     Estimated value.  Sample result Is over the Instrument's linear calbrallon unye by less than 10"*.

-------
                                                   TABLE A contd.
                                           VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                          AREA 5 SOIL BORING SAMPLES
                                              METALS AND CYANIDE
                                         1990 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
                                        P1IROLA TOR PRODUCTS COMPANY
Anal vie
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Silver
Tin
Zinc
Cyanide
SBI4:l-3
8220J
—
8.3J
95.91
.28B
143
2961
82.3J
24.4
.12
130
2.0BJ
IIS
406J
2.2
SBI4:3-5
9870J
—
II. 2J
S6.5J
.266
18.6
45.3J
34.2J
17.8
—
36.7
___
12.8
I28J
1.6
SBI4:6-8
I0600J
—
54J
85.8J
28D
—
25.8J
I8.7J
8.4
—
227
—
—
72.7J
1.0
SUI 5: 1-3
9-I70J
—
5.0J
643J
—
1.6
I9.2J
32.0J
12.3
—
22.6
—
—
92.4J
.70
SBI5:3.5-4.5
I3700J
—
9.4J
2I9J
56B
107
2750J
352J
73.0
.96
138
6.8J
113
373J
25.0
SBI5:4~5
I6IOOJ
—
II 9J
I73J
.61 B
—
II2J
35.IJ
15.5
—
34.4
—
—
I02J
—
Sll 16:0-2
I3300J
—
5.4J
I06J
.39B
5.7
38.6J
24. 6 J
I6.9J
—
29.3
—
—
9I.9J
.63
SB 16:2-4
I5IOOJ
—
—
I3IJ
580
—
I9.2J
I6.6J
40.7
—
25.6
—
—
79.0J
—
SB 16:4-6
I4400J
—
—
II9J
.508
4.9
3I.3J
54.3J
11.8
—
40.3
—
—
87.3
—
SBI7:2-4
I0900J
—
—
52.6J
JIB
1.3
I9.2J
39.3J
11.2
—
26.9
—
—
99.4J
—
Notes: All concentrations are in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg = parts per million (ppm)).
      SB 15:6-8 not submitted for analysis.
—  - Analyle not detected in this sample but present in another.
J    - Semi-quantitative due to QA/QC requirements.
B    = Value is above Instrument Detection Limit (IDL), but below Contract Required Detection Limit (CRDL).

-------
                                                   TABLE  4   (conf'd)
Analvte
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Silver
Tin
Zinc
Cyanide
SBI7:5-7
I8300J
—
—
I24J
.67 B
—
29. IJ
24.6J
14.9
—
39.3
...
._.
93.7J
.86
5017:8-10
I5200J
—
5.2J
I05J
.61 B
—
23.IJ
2I.9J
12.5
—
26.2
__.
...
7I.6J
—
SBI8.I-3
9780J
8.6BJ
2.3BJ
I32J
.260
439
4060J
337J
45.1
.39
516
7.9J
193
2290J
114
SOI8:4-6
9070J
—
—
5I.9J
.29B
15.7
54.6J
38.6J
12.8
—
35.2

9.7
IIIJ
2.2
SB 18:6-8
20900J
—
—
I26J
.67 B
1.9
52.8J
29.8J
14.9
—
44.0
	
—
I06J
I.I
SB 19:2-
7940J
23.7J
—
85.8J
—
3390
I3000J
I9IOJ
50.3
—
320
3.0J
133
3460J
167
SB 19:4-6
9030J
5.3J
76.9J
280
—
26.9J
38. IJ
I0.9J
2IJ
20.3
—
7I.2J
6.2
SBI9:6-8
9060J
5.3J
77.9J
.258
—
I5.9J
20.2J
22.8J
25J
20.7
—
62.8J
3.2
SB20:4-6
9I50J
5.IJ
55.IJ
.258
38.7
94.8J
94.4J
14. IJ
.22J
21.6
2.8J
I65J
6.2
SB20:7-8
8740J
5.IJ
46.4J
.286
4.0
78.6J
49.6J
9.4J
.26J
21.2
—
72. IJ
.57
,5SB20:8.5-I
II300J
32.4J
116
.50B

I26J
23.6J
23.6J
.30J
23.1
—
74.0J
.67
Notes:  All concentrations are in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg - parts per million (pprn)).
       SBI 5:6-8 not submitted Tor analysis.
—  - Analyte not detected in this sample but present in another.
J    - Semi-quantitative due to QA/QC requirements.
B    «• Value is above Instrument Detection Limit (IDL), but below Contract Required Detection Limit (CRDL).

-------
                                                                  TABLE  4 contd.
                                                      VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                      AKKA 5 SOIL BORING SAMPLES
                                                SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
                                                     1990 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
                                                   PIIROLATOR  PRODUCTS COMPANY

TCLCompounds                  SB14:1 3    SBM35     SBI5:1 3     SBI5.3545 SBt5:45    SB1602    SB16:2-4     SB17:24     SB17:57

Benzole Acid                       220J        -          -            990J        -          -          ...           B5J
Acenaphlhytene
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
N Nilrosodiphenytamlne               -          •-•          -            42J
Pentachlorophenol                   —          -          --            -          -         54J
Phenanthrene                       100J
Anthracene
CM n-Butytpltlhalate                   -          -           -            I20J        -         MOJ         —          —           S5J
Fhioranthene                        84J
Pyrene                            11OJ        ---          —            —          —          —          —
Bulyfcenzytphlhalale                 -                       -            I60J        -                      -          _
Benzo(a)Anlhracen«                 —          —         .—            —          —          —          —
Chrysene                          -          -                          100J        -          ...          _          420         -
Bis(2€lhyfhexyi)phlhalale             250 J        52 J        89 J            340 J       42J         -          -          -          1BOJ
U* Oclyl Phlhalale                 -          - -           -            74J        -                 .     -          -          -
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene                 84XJ       —          —            —          —          —          —          —
Benzo(k)Fhioranthena                 8«J                   -            -           -          ...___

TIC Compounds

Total Unknowns                    S72BOJ      8760J        -          171300J       -         220J         600J       36100J      10700J
Total Unknown Hydrocarbons          -                      -            -          -          -          260J       B3800J       8680J
Total Unk. Cyclic Hydrocarbons        -                      -            -          -                      -          4700J       -
Aiochlor                           -                     2IOJN         -          -           -          -  j
Bromochkxobenzene                 —          —          —            —          —          —          —  |
Benzo Oulnofine
Dimethyl Heptadecane                •-          -          —            —          -          -          300J        —          3900J
Hepladecane                       —          —          —            —          —          —          —          —          990JN
Mono(2 Ether)Hexanedk)Jc Add        -                      --            -           :                                 -          -
2.6.10.14 Tetramdhyl Hexadecane      -          -            -            -          -          -          -          —          1000JN
2.6.10.15-Tetramethyl Heptadecane     -          -           -            -          -          -          -          —          2200JN


Notes:  All concentrations In microgmms per hlogram (ug/kg - parts per bMon (poo)).
        Nosentvolalte organic compounds were detected In SB 14:6-8, SB15:64. SB16.44.  and SB20:6 8
    •   Compound not detected hi this sample, but present in another.
J   »   Semi-quantitative due .to QA/QC criteria outside ol control NmHs. value below Contract Required Quanlitalion Limit (CHOI) or compound being a TIC.
X   -   Identifies coelutinglndislingulshableisomers.
N  -   Identified TIC.

-------
                                                              TABLE  4  o(conl'd)
TCL Compounds                  SB 17:610    SB16:1 3     SBI946     5816:66    SB19:24     SBt9:46     SB19:6*     SB20:4*     SB20:6.5 10

Benzole Acid                         —           84J                      —          —           ...           ._          /2J
Acenaphthytene                      —           —          —            —          —           —           —          360           47J
Acenaphthene                        —           —          —                       —                        —          77J           —
Fkiofene                             —           —          —            —          —           —           —          130J
N-NHrosocfiphenyfamine                —           —          —            —          —           —           ~
PenlachkNophenol                    --•           —          -            —          —           —           —
Phenanthrene                        —           9IJ         -            -          05J          -           —          67J           -
Anthracene                          —           —          —            —          —           •--           —          530
Di n Butytphlhaiate                    —                       56J          47J
Fluoranthene                         —           64J         —            —          340J         -           -          120J
Pyrene                              ~           130J                                 360J           -           -          130J
Butylbenzylphthalala                  -           -                                  180J         -           -
Benzo(a)Anthrac«n«                  —           310J                      -          380XJ
Chrysene                            —           -             -            -           380XJ
Bis(2€lhytiexyQphthaMe              7SJ                     56J          -         1200          45J         53J         270J
Dta-Octyl  Phthatale                  —           150J         -            -          230J                      —          -
Benzo(b)FhJormthene                 —           —          •••            —          —           —           —
Benzo(kJFhjoranthene                 —           —          —            —          —           —           _          _            _

TIC Compounds

Total Unknowns                      -         120300J      9990J        670J       104000J                    -         34300J         -
Total Unknown Hydrocarbons           ~         20700J       2960J         —         92000J        —           —         91300J         —
Total Unk. Cycfc Hydrocarbons         -                                               -                         -          -            -
Alochlor                             -                                    -          -           -           -
Bromochlorobenzene                  —           —          —            —          —           —           —          —            230J
Bemo Oubiofine                      —           -                       -          -                        -         2100J         -
Dimethyl Heptadecane                 —           —          —            —          —           —           —          —            ~
Heptadecane                         —           —          —            —          —           —           —
Mono(2Ether)HexanedioteAdd        390JN
2.6.10.14-Telramethyl Hexadecane       —           —          —            —          —           —           —
2.6.10,15 Tetramelhyl Heptadecane


Notes:  Al concentrations in micrognims per Mogram  (ug/kg = parts per bWon (ppb)).
        No semUotatfe organic compounds were detected In SB14:6^,  SB15:6fl.  SB16:46. andSB20:66.
—  •   Compound not detected In this sample, but present in another.
J   »   Semi-quantitative due to OA/QC criteria outside ol control fcnils, value below Contract Required Ouanlilation Unit (CROL) or compound being • TIC.
X   -   Identifies coetutinglndistingulshabteteomers.
N  •   Identified TIC.

-------
                                               TABLE  5
                                      VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                         SURFACE SOIL SAMPLES
                                    VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
                                     1990 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
                                    PUROLATOK PRODUCTS COMPANY
                                                                                                      SS2I:0-I
TCL Compounds               SSI:0-I    SS2:0-I    SS4.0-I    SS5:0-1    SS6:0-I   SS7:0-I    SS9:0-1    (SS9.-Q-I Pup.)

Vinyl Chloride                   2J
Melhylene Chloride              ---       ---       ---       22BJ
Acetone                        ---       ---       ---        5J        34J
Carbon Disulfide                ---       ---       ---       ---        —       —       —         I5J
1,1 Dichloroelhane                3J        —       —       —        —       —       —         —
1,2 Dichloroelhene               43        2J        IJ        ---        4J
2-Butanone                     —       —       —       —        9J        —       —         —
1,1,1 Trichloroethane            II        ---       —       —        —       —       —
Trichloroelhene                 130        —       5J        —        2J        —       7J          IOJ
Chlorobenzene                  ---       ---       —        IJ        -—       —•       —

TIC Compounds

Unknowns                      —       —       —       —        —       99J       —         —

                                                                                   I
Notes:        All concentrations are in micrograms per kilogram (ug/kg = parts per billion (ppb)).
             No volatile organic compounds were delected in SS3:0-I, and SS8:0-I.
—  "       Compounds not present  in this sample, but present in another.
J    -       Semi-quantitative due to QA/QC criteria outside of control limits, value below Contract Required Quantitation Limit
             (CRQL) or compound being a TIC.
B    «=       Contaminant found in associated blank. Sample value is greater than 10 limes the associated  blank value.

-------
                                                                        TABLE  5  contd.
                                                            VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                               SURFACE SOIL SAMPLES
                                                     SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
                                                          1990  REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
                                                        PUROLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY
TCI Compounds
                                   ssiai
                                                       SS20:0- I
                                                     ISS2:01Dup.>
                                                                                                 555:01   556:0-1
4-Methylphenol
2.4 DJmcthylphcnol
Benzole Acid
Naphthalene
2-MethytnaphalefM
Acenaptithene
(Mbenioluran
Fluocene
PentacMorophenol
Anthracene
04 n-B
Fluoranfhene
Pytene
Benio(«)Antt»»cenf
Cnryiene
01 n-Oclyl PMhaMa
Bnuo(b)F(iKX«mhen«
Benzo(k)Fluo(*nthciM
Benzo(*)Pytene
lndeno(1.2.3-cd|Pyrent
Dlbenz((.h)Anthracen«
Ben/o(g.h.l(P«yl»f>e
Acenaphthytenc
 71J
450
1301

770
520
430
340J
46J

690XJ
690KJ
aaoi
210J
50J
59J
480
3201
220)
200J
62J
130J
410XJ
410NJ
2IOJ
                                                         13UJ
21HJ
14OJ
350J
190J
80.1

360IU
380 XJ
200J
99.1

991
 300J
 1101
 2601
 200J
 250J

2600
 560
 60J
3700
2400
14in
1500
 86J

2500XJ
2500XJ
1400
 490
 190J
 440
                                                               5SJ
                                                               84J
                                                               49J
                                                   9901
                                                  7600J
                                                  3OOOJ
                                                  83OOJ
                                                  490OI
                                                  8400J

                                                  77000
                                                  18000
19000XJ
19000XJ
 7400
 2800
  610
 7500
  150J
22OJ     110000
180J     65000
 76J     43000
 54J     32000
 52XJ    69000X1
 52XJ    6900DXJ
        33000
        16000
         5200J
        17000
                                                                      2601
                                                                      210J
                                                                      350J

                                                                       83J
                                                                                                                    2601
                                210J
                                200J
                                140J
                                1401
                                                                                                          5521:0-1
                                                                                       558:0-1   559:0-1   (559:010up.l
                                                                                          72J
 -       3400J
 —       360OI
220OI     7300

 150J
                                                           490J

-------
                                                         TABLE 5 '-contd.
                                                 VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                   SURFACE SOIL SAMPLES
                                                    METALS AND CYANIDE
                                                1990 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
                                              PIIROI.ATOK PRODUCTS COMPANY

Analvte
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Tin
Zinc
Cyanide

SS 1:0-1
9420
—
II.3J
229
—
25.IJ
1280
33.7
19.6
—
119
—
—
—
—
106
.74

SS2:0- 1
8280
—
—
129
.368
50.9J
823
46.6J
20.3
I3J
59.6
—
—
—
—
135
2.3
SS20:0- 1
(SS2:0-I DUD.)
10300
—
—
152
—
I7.IJ
641
34.3J
15.3
.3IJ
46.9
—
—
—
—
121
1.2

SS3:0- 1
M400J
—
9.5J
288
.478
2.9
28.1
83.8J
29.5
.12
40.4
—
—
—
—
I62J
.73

SS4:0- 1
69IOJ
—
—
25IOJ
.528
26.5J
I69J
I2IOJ
292J
.35
224
—
—
—
15.5
2840J
3.6

SS5:0-1
I6400J
—
247
732J
7.6
—
26.2J
56.6J
57.IJ
.13
52.5
—
—
I6.7J
—
95. IJ
—

SS6:0-I
6760J
—
6.4J
588
.448
78.9J
1220
442J
88.2J
.51
138
—
—
—
—
535J
10.7

SS7:0- 1
8I80J
—
16.3
88.4J
.768
—
I0.6J
64.3J
N IJ
—
—
—
—
—
5.4
44.IJ
—

SS8:0- 1
7550
II. 7J
4.IJ
318
—
622
3940
459J
110
.52
198
—
2.6BJ
—
435
3880
25.5

SS9:0- 1
7840J
25.9J
8.IJ
766J
—
796J
IOIOOJ
IIIOJ
3IIJ
.78J
452J
—
4.6BJ
—
387J
IIIOOJ
40.3J
SS2 1:0-1
(SS9:0-I DUD.)
7440J
18. IJ
	
697J
	
830J
7370J
8I9J
286J
1 IJ
520J
—
—
_ —
478J
I2600J
38.5J
Notes: All concentrations are in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg= parts per million (ppm)).
—  = Analyte not detected in this sample but present in another.
J    = Semi-quantitative due to QA/QC requirements.
B    = Value is above Instrument Detection Limit (IDL), but below Contract Required Detection Limit (CRDL).

-------
                                                          TABLE'S contd.
                                                 VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                    SURFACE SOIL SAMPLES
                                                  PESTICIDE/PCB COMPOUNDS
                                                1990 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
                                                •UROLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY
TCL Compound

HeptachlorEpoxide
Arochlor 1248
Arochlor 1254
          SS20:0-1
S2:0-1    (SS2:0-I DUD.)    SS3:0- i   SS4:0- i    SS5:0-1    SS6:0-1
                                                                    SS2I:0-I
                                      57:0-1    SS8:0-I   SS9:0-I    (SS9:0-I Pup.)
15
           540
3700C    5300C     320      I1000C
         1000
1000
3300C    I4000C     8900C
Notes:  All concentrations are in micrograms per kilogram (ug/kg = parts per billion (ppb)).
       No pesticide/PCB compounds were detected in SS 1:0-1.
—  = Compound not present in this sample, but present in another.
C    - Value confirmed by GC/MS analysis.

-------
                                                                       TABLE  6
Compound

Trichloroelhenc

Tdrachlofodhene

l.t.Dichloroethane

1.1,1 Trichloroelhan*

1-1.2Dlchloroe1hene

Trichtorofluoromelhane

Methytene Chloride

1 .2 Dtchtorobetuene



Compound

Trichloroethene

Tetrachloroelhene

1,1 Dlchlor oelhane

1.1.1 Trichloroelhane

1-1.2-CNchloroethene

Trichtorofluofomelhane

Melhytene Chloride

 1.2-Dtchterobenzene
                                                                       TABLE 6-11
                                                             VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                           VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
                                                                     SOIL SAMPLES
                                                            I9R6 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
                                                          PUROLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY
                                                                                                                                  SB 1525
124 50.8 23 5 J 289 25.4 J
150 — 634
858
- - 13.5 J 185 15.0 J
9.22 J 13 0 J
SB 17 7.5 SB 18 2.5 SB 18 5 SB 19 5 SB 20 5
7.13 156 16.9 149 7.59
253 397 J 118 65.1 7.57 83.9 139 118
20.5 -- 20.2 J — 14.6 - - 8.04
_ ... ... 5.75
SB 22 5 SB 23 7.5
SB 22 5 PUP) SB 22 7.5 SB 23 7.5 (DUP) SB 24 2.5 SB 24 7.5 SB 25 2 5
28.9 189 236 - - 112 27.5 4.92
18.5
11.2
                  19.8
24.7
22.7
                                                          20.7
                                                                                     25.7

                                                                                     226
                                                                                      10.4
                                                                   216
                                                                                                         150

-------
                                                                             TABLE 6

                                                                             TABLE 6-11 (conl'il)


                              SB252.5                                  SB277.5                          SB 31-7
Compound                     (PUP)    SB 26 2.5   SB 26 7.5  SB 277.5    PUP)      SB 29 10    SB 31 7      (PUP)     Q 9 2.5     D95      D97.5

Trlchloroelhene                 5.14       121         346      585       424        569        507        7.53       47.7      06.2        44.4

Tetrachloroclhcne               —         7.97                 12.7       17.0         .                     ...          see      7.31

1,1 Dlchloroelhane               —         ....           .          ...          ...          ...          ...        _

1.1.1-Trichloroetham             26.9        48.1       122      18.1        20.4                               ...          _       20.8

11.2Dlchloroelhene             —         —                              —          —           -          —          —        ...         22.2

Trichtorofluoromethane           18.4        29.0        —        15.3       13.1        —          -          —          _.        _

Mdhytene Chloride              -          15.8

l.2Dtchlorobcnzene             —         —                   —          —          —                     —          —       14.3


Notes:      All concentrations are In parts per bWon(ppb)
—           Compound not detected In this sample, but present In another.
J    •      Semi quantitative value due to QA/QC data vaRdalion requlremenls.

-------
                                TABLE 7
                       VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                     OIL/WATER SEPARATOR SAMPLES
            VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS, PESTICIDES/PCBs
                 AND TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS
                    1990 REMEDIATION INVESTIGATION
                     PUROLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY

TCL - VOC                SW-OWS    SED-OWS   SB26'    SB27:0-4    SB:28:2-4

Acetone                   91J        6800J       —
Chloroform                 0.6J        ~        —
Toluene                    —          —        —         2J         —
Chlorobenzene               —          —        —         U
TIC Volatiles

Unknown Compounds         65J         —
Unknown Hydrocarbons      120J        50000J
Decane                     —         24000JN
Undecane                   25JN
Undecane and Unknown       —         13000J
Dichlorobenzene and          —         15000J
 Unknown
Ethylmethylbenzene           ™         6200J
Trimethvlbenzene             —         8800J
TCL Pesticide/PCB

Delta-BHC                 —          —         —        130

Total Petroleum             1100       180000       NA      3000         NA
Hydrocarbons
Notes:      All volatile and pesticide concentrations are in micrograms per kilogram
           (ug/kg) except SW-OWS which is in micrograms per liter (ug/1).  Both
           units are equivalent to parts per billion (ppb). TPH concentrations are
           milligrams per liter (mg/1) for SW-OWS and milligrams per kilogram
           (mg/kg) for SED-OWS and SB27:0-4. Both units are equivalent to parts
           per million (ppm).
     =     Compound not present in this sample but detected in another.
J    =     Estimated value due to QA/QC criteria outside of control limits, value
           below Contract Required Quantitation Limit (CRQL), or compound being
           a TIC.
N    =     Identified TIC.
NA  =     Not analyzed for in this sample.
"    =     Sample from SB26 was collected at a depth of 5.5 to 7.5 feet.

                                   9-55

-------
                                                                       TABLE   7
                                                           VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                        OIL/WATER SEPARATOR SAMPLES
                                                    SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
                                                         1990  REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
                                                        PUROLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY
TCL Compounds
                                                    SB//.I) 4  bU2B:?4


?
On
o\











Phenol
2-Mcthytphenol
4-Methylphenol
Nitrobenzene
2.4 CHmethylphenol
Naphthalene
2-Methylnapthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Dibenzoturon
Dtethytphthalate
Fluor ene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluor anthene
Pyrene
Benzo(a)Anthracene
Chrysene
Bls(2-Ethy1he>ry1)phthalate
Benzo(b)Fhjoranthene
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
Benzo(a)Pyrene
lndeno(1 ,2.3-cd) Pyrene
Dlbenzo(a.h)Anthracene
Benzo(g.h.l)Peryfene
!
—
15J
29J
-.
22J
48J
21J
32J
--
60XJ
60XJ
18J
—

—
220J
400J
10OOJ
380J
180J
—
650J
3100J
3100J
2300J
2400J

...
UOOJ
3400J
34OOJ
130OJ
B90J
400J
1000J
...
71J
—
55J
—
79J
69J
SOJ
...

40J
—
—


...
390.1
230.1
550.1
SbHJ
IHUtIO
64(10
noo.i
^5000
151100

200HO
IWJJKXI
31000
320000
210000
160000
13'WOO

3JI«IIX)XJ
330WIOXJ
130000
29000
12000
28000
1IC Compounds

Total Unknowns
Total Unknown Hydrocarbons
Total Unknown PAH
Tola) Unknown Alcohol
Benzofluoranthune
Benzonapthoturan
Dlmethylphenanlhrcne
Dodecanamlde.N.N-Bls(2-Hydro)
Heptadecane
Hexadecane
Henadecanolc Acid
Methyl Chrysene
Tetradccanolc Acid
sw-ows
28300J
48000J
—
2BOOJ
...
...

SEDOWS SB26
71000J 4900J
96200J 160J
_
._


._ _.
SB27.0-4
302000J
B6000J
344000J
-.
soono.i
5600IIJ
36000J
SB2B:2-4
3120J


...

...

                                                                                                                                        480JN     -
                                                                                                                                        520JN
                                                                                                                                        —      5000OJ
                                                                                                                                        360JN    -
                                                                                                                                                          370JN
                                                                                                                                                          370JN
Notes:    SW-OWS concentrations In mlcrograms per Uter (ug/l - parts |n.-i tulllon (ppb)). AH other concentrations In mlcrograms per kilogram (ug/kg - parts per bIDon (ppb)).
J  -     Seml-quantttatlve due to QA/OC crtterla outside ol control llmlis. value below Contract Required QuantHallon Umtt (CRQL). or compound being a TIC.
N  -     Identified TIC.
X  -     Identifies coelutlng Indistinguishable Isomers.
—  -     Compound not deluded In this sample, but present In unotliu

-------
                                 TABLE 7 contd.
                        VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                      OIL/WATER SEPARATOR SAMPLES
                           METALS AND CYANIDE
                       1990 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
                     PUROLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY
 Analvte

 Aluminum
 Arsenic
 Barium
 Beryllium
 Cadmium
 Chromium
 Copper
 Lead
 Mercury
 Nickel  '
 Tin
 Zinc
 Cyanide
sw-ows

 933J

 165BJ

  11.5J
  16.2J
  67. U
  51.9J



 269J
SED-OWS   SB26
           SB27:0-4    SB28:2-4
 9700
    7.7J
  256

  44.0J
  153J
  425
  158J
    .65
  73.5
  26.5
 767
  2.7J
13000J
   5.0J
  98.8J
    .60B

  18.5J
  23.5J
  11.4J
    24J
  22.8

  75.1J
10900J
   10.9J
  319J
    .6 IB
  41.4
  45.1J
 502J
  583
    .43J
 129
   8.4
 675J
   4.3
13600J
   3.4J
  156J
    .67B

  37.7J
  41.4J
  123J
    .25J
  31.0

  78.0J
Notes:       All concentrations,  except for SW-OWS, are in milligrams per  kilogram
            (mg/kg = parts per  million (ppm)). Units for SW-OWS are micrograms per
            liter (ug/1 = pans per billion (ppb)).
     =      Analvte not detected in this sample but present in another.
J    =      Semi-quantitative due to QA/QC requirements.
B    =      Value  is above Instrument Detection Limit (IDL),  but  below  Contract
            Required Detection Limit (CRDL).
                                   9-57

-------
                                                         TABLE  8
                                               VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                     UNNAMED DRAINAGE WAY SEDIMENT SAMPLES
                                            VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
                                              1990 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
                                            I'UKOLATOK PRODUCTS COMPANY



                                                                 TS2I:01                               TS20:01
TO.Compound       TS1:2-3      TS2:0 1      TS2:23     TS*01     (TS*0-t Pup)    TS6.01      TS7:01     (TS7:0-t  Oup\   TS9:01

2-Butanone           —          —            -          —            —            —          —            1J
TffcMoroelhene        3J         2J          8          5J           6J            6          3J           7J            3J


 Notes: •     Al concentrations In mlcrogrwns per Mogram (tig/kg « parts per bMHon (ppb)).
           No votalle organic compounds were delected In TS1.D-1. TS1:S4. TS2:Sfl, TS3:0 I, TS323. TS3:56, TS4:23. TS4:54,
           TS5:(H. TS5:2-3. TS5:5«. TS6:2-3. TS6:54J. TS8:01.
 J   »     Seml^juanlH«llve due to concentration betow Contract Required QuanlitatlonLimW (CRQL)
 —   •     Compound not detected In this sample, but present hi another.

-------
                                                            VALID ANALV'CAL KfcSULIS
                                               UNNAMED DRAINAGE      V SEDIMENT SAMPLES
                                                     SEMI-VOLATILE Ofc^ANIC COMPOUNDS
                                                           1990 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
                                                         PtIROLATOR  PRODUCTS COMPANY
TCI Compounds                TS1:0-1         TSI:2 3         IS2O I

Phenol                        —
4-Mcthylphcnol
Nitrobenzene                   —
Benzole Acid                   —             B7J
Naplithalene                    110J           33W           1»U
2-Mcttiylnaphthalene             130J           540            330J
Acenaphthylene                 —             76J           120J
Acenaplilhen«                  —             5IJ           !ft.l
Dtbcnznluan                   -             UilU           IWI
Fluorene                       —             6SJ           I4UJ
PentacMorophenol
Ptienanthrene                   54OJ           560           liMO
Anthracene                     140J            76J           170J
CH n Butytphthalate               —             140J
Fluocamhene                   890            090           IbOtl
Pyrene                        430J           570           '.fM
Benzo(a)Anthracene             380J           530           1WIO
Ctwysene                      420J           4BO           000
Bls(2-Ethytieifyl)phttiaMe         —              6UJ
Dl-n-Octyl PMhatate
Benzo(b)Fkmrmlhene            690XJ         13OOXJ          13OUXJ
Benzo(k)Fkior«nthcne            690XJ         1300XJ          13UOXJ
Benzo(a)Pyfene                 380J           440J           U)0
lndeno(1.2.3-cd)Pytene           120J           13OJ           300J
Olbenzo(a.h)Anthraceiw          —             62J
Benzo(g.n.l)Perylefie             11OJ           16OJ           470
1.2.4-TMchtorobeniene
4-CNoro-3-Memylphenol

TIC Compounds

Benxeneam>rve.HydtochtofMe      —
BenzoFhiorene                  —             —
BenzoPyrene                   J10J           —
Oecane
4 Methyl Octane
Total PCS                      —            3SOOJ
Total Unknown AMehyde         4900J
Total Unknown Hydrocarbon     4570J
Total Unknown Sub.Hydrocarbon  S400J
Total Unknown PAH
Total Unknowns                1840J          36760J         BUGUOJ
                                                                         TABLE 8  contd.
                                                                        TS?:?3         TS?:56
               470J
 aoj
 68J
 110J
 99J
2001
110J
130J
140J
 I90JXJ
 190JXJ
 1OOJ
 56J

 51J
                                                                                                     TSJ:I) I
 240.1
 3M)J
 670
  /2.I
  6/.I
 A»t.l
  7JJ

 670
 100J
  6M
 StiO
 6110
 B10
 480
 10OOXJ
 1000IU
 32OJ
 190J
 56.1
 300J
                                                           TS21:01
                                           TS4:Ot
  7SOJ
  330J
  490
  69J
  t7(U
  I70J
  140J

 1500
  210J
  66J
 2500
 1700
 1100
 1100
 100J

 1700KJ
 1700XJ
  77O
  310J
  98J
  380J
                                                                            TS4:?3
360J
120J
1301
260J

16OJ
300J

2BOJ
2BOJ
330J

460XJ
460XJ
300J
200J

190J
                                                                              82J
                46J
               930JN
3690J

 S20J


14430J
30600J

 i7onj


83tiOOJ
B700J

14140J


20370J
                                                                                                                                 263200J
                                                                             200JN
                  3030.1
                                                                                                                                                     2250J
Notes:         At concentrations tn mtcrograms per klogram (ug/kg - |ioili per bHlon (ppb)).
               No seml-votatte organic compounds were detectedm IS 1:5-6. TS3:2-3. TS3:5-6. TS5:5«.
J    >         Semt-quanMatlvc due to QAAX criteria outside of control ImRs. value below Contract Required Quanlrlatlon I Inilt (Cl Wl) or compound being a TIC.
N    -         Identified TIC.
X    -         Identities coekitlng InrJstlnguishiitalc Isomrrs
               Compound not delected In this sample, but prudent In unullwr.

-------
                                                                             TABLE    8   (confd)
TCL Compounds                 TS4:S-6         TSVO-t

Ptwool                          •••              •*•
4 M<-thflph<-nol
Nitrobenzene
Benzole Acid
Naphthalene                     —              45J
? Mrthylnephthalene              —              80J
Acenaphthytene                  —             130J
Acenaphthene                    —
Dtoenzoruran                    —              S1J
Fkioiene                         —             130J
PenlBchlorophenol                —
Pherantlicne                    «3J            380.1
Anthracene                      —              92J
DI-n-Butylphthalute
Fhjoranthene                    75 J            310J
Pyrene                          SSJ            2»J
Benzo(a)Anlhracene              54J            2SOJ
Chrysene                        42J            1MJ
Bls(2 Ethyt>e«y1)pt>thatate          —              53J
Ol-nOctyl Pnthalale
B«uo(b)Fluorannwnc        .     B8XJ          29UXJ
Bcnto|li)Fluoranth«n<             MXJ          290XJ
Benzo(a)Pyien«                  S2J            ISO!
lndeno<1.?.3-cd)Pyrene            —              SflJ
O*>«nzo(a.h)Ann»acefw
Benzo(g.h.l)PctylefW              —              6?J
1.2.4 Trfchlorobefuene
4<:Hoco-3-Me«hylphenol

TIC Compounds

Bctuenramlne. Hydroehtorlde
BefUoFkiorcne                   —             23OI
BcnxoPyicnc                     •*•              *~*
Oecan*
4 Methyl Oclune
Total PCB                        —
Total Unknown Aldehyde
Total Unknown Hydrocarbon
Total Unknown Sub.Hydrocarbon
Tola! Unknown*                  TOO!           S490J
TS6:0 t
 1.10J
                              TS6:5€
 B4J
 I40J
 IIWJ
 100J
 74J
 IdilXJ
 teoxj
 en
                 S9J


                 59J

                120J
I3IU
 94J
 94J
 67J
12IIXJ
120XJ
 SSJ
                                              TS7:0-1
                               210J

                               230J
                               440J
                               550J

                               330J
                               290J
                               340J

                              4300
                               S70J
                                4SJ
                                42J
 strnu
 3900J
 5100J
 BHOJ
 '440J
t^UOXJ
12000XJ
 560OJ
 laooj
 830J
 1BOOJ
 TSTttOI
fTS7:0-1 Oup 1

   100J
   320J

   440J
   460J
   560J
   110J
   470J
   310J
   4501
   370J
  6600
   770J

 1SOOO
 11000
 8000
 7000
 12008

 KXinoxj
 18000KI
 6200
 4ono
  800J
 3900
                                                                            TS001
 640J
 5501
 6901

 B40J
 S40J
 60OJ
 440J
8300
 950J
 3«U
20000
13000J
11000
11000
 6OOJ

jnoooxj
30000KJ
11OOO
6OOO
1SOOJ
6300
                                                                                           TS9:0-1
 290J

 180J
 47UJ
 690J
 140J
 350J
 330J
 320.1

 3900
  690J

11000
 67UO
 4400
 5500
  440J

1/UOOXJ
17000XJ
 6700
 4100
 1000.1
 4900

 160.1
                                                              800J
 150JN
1310J
3600J
                                                                            S670J
                                                                                            2070J
                                                                                                            1020J
                                              76000J

                                              389000J
                                                                                                                                          3866001
                                                            111200J

                                                            394300J
                                               52800J

                                              168100J
Notes:    Al concentratlom In mtciogianra per Mogtam (ug/hg - parts rx-i taHon - |ppb|).
          No wml-votalie organic compound> wcra delected kt TS1:S-6. TS3:2-J. TS3:5-6.
J   -    Seml-quantllatlve due to OA/QC crRerki oulsMe of control Imfls. value below Contracl Required Quantllallon Urn* (CROL) or compound being • TIC.
N   -    Identified TIC
X   -    Identifies coekitlng Indistinguishable Isomers.
    •    Compound not delected In this sample, but present In another.
B   -    Contaminant round In associated blank. Sample value Is greulor lluii to limes the assoculed blank value.

-------
                                                       TABLES  contd.
                                             VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                    UNNAMED DRAINAGE WAY SEDIMENT SAMPLES
                                              PESTICIDE/PCB COMPOUNDS
                                            1990 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
                                           PIIKOI.ATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY
TCL Compound

HeptachkxEpoxkfe
DieWrin
Arochlor1260
Arochlot 1254
                                             TS21:01                              TS20:01
TS1:01  TS1:23 TS2:0 1  TS2:2 3  TS3:01  TS4:0 t  fTS4:0 1  Pup)   TS5:01  TS6:01 TS7:0 1  (TS701 Pup)
                                                                          31
                                                                          39
                                              240
 570
3400C  1500C   1100C   6800C   3000C
210
1200C
                                                                                   570
 Notes:      Al concentrations In mkrograms per kilogram (ug/Kg > parts per bWon (ppb))
           No pestWde/PCB compounds were detected In TS1:S8. TS2:5fl. TS323. TS3:56. TS423.
           TS4:5<. TS5:2 3. TS5:56. TS6:23.  TS6:56. TS8:0-t. TS8:0 1.
 C  -      Value confirmed by GC/MS analysis.
 —  m      Compound not detected In this sample, but present hi another.

-------
                                                         TABLE  8 contd.
                                                VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                      UNNAMED DRAINAGE WAY SEDIMENT SAMPLES
                                                   METALS AND CYANIDE
                                               1990 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
                                             PUKOLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY

Anatyte
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
BeryWum
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Tin
Zinc
Cyanide

TS1:01
15400J
—
—
510
.658
96J
68.4
146J
61 .5 J
.44
38.7
_
21 7 J
.82

TS1:2-3
20000J
._
6.3J
327
.768
6.7J
56.1
72.4J
45.8J
2.3
34.9
—
160J
16.7

TS1:5-6
12100J
...
92J
126
.408
...
18.5
—
132
.12
23.0
—
58 3 J
-

TS2:01
10100J
...
15.7
260J
.658
44.8J
246J
181J
153J
.68
41.8
77
443J
.87

TS2:23
15200J
-
120
637J
958
59. U
208J
217J
126J
.60
599
5.2B
386J
13

TS2:56
14800J
...
2.4
127J
BOB
1.5J
22.0J
4.9BJ
43.9J
—
20.9
—
60 7 J
—

TS3:01
14600
...

455
.638
49.4J
373
338
199J
99J
730
5.18
964
3.7

TS3:23
21 BOO J
—
...
253
1.0B
_.
27.8
—
16.0
—
21.4
—
102J
—

TS3:5<
15300
...
23 OJ
174
.408
...
22.3
—
14.0
—
21.5
—
65.1
—

TS4:01
8620
—
—
B30J
.448
55 6J
150J
542
109J
.57J
96 5J
7.7
621J
198
TS2t:01
(TS4:0 1 Dup)
10100
10.6BJ
._
194J
.308
372J
3920J
814
108J
.97J
1510J
— .
1090J
49.5
Notes:  Al concentrations are In mWgrams per kftogram (mg/kg « parts per mMon (ppm)).
—   •  Analyte not detected In this sample but present in another.
J   >  Semi-quantitative due to QA/OC requirements.
B   -  Value Is above Instrument Detection Limit (IDL). bill below Contract Required Detection UmH (CRDL).

-------
                                                       TABLE   8   (conf'd)
Analyte
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
BeryMhim
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Tm
Zinc
Cyanide
TS4:23
16400
...
95J
254
.698
81. 5J
67.1
79.9
17.3
—
60.1
—
96.7
1.1
TS4:5«
16100
—
50J
230
668
22.4J
30.0
34.2
14.1
—
355
6.0B
65.0
—
TS5:01
20600J
—
...
243
.698
52.6J
394
104J
36.9J
.21
63.9
—
126J
61.0
TS5:23
25100J


29^
948
2.7J
409
...
166
.40
30.9
...
11IJ
74
TS5:5^
14000J
_.
6.6J
166
.308
...
230
—
110
—
21.6
—
58.4J
—
TS6:0 1
21100J

...
257
718
47J
32.7
—
25.6
.29
30.3
—
113J
2.2
TS6:23
22100J
...
...
334
.658
16.6J
406
333
182
.19
36.4
._
132J
1.5
TS6:5<
14400
—
	
179
.468
—
166
—
12.6
.11J
24.1
_
61.2
—
                                                                                                                 TS20.01
                                                                                                       TS7:01   (TS7:0 1  Dupl

                                                                                                       6300J    10500J
                                                                                                         60J
                                                                                                        tea
                                                                                                          .328
                                                                                                        25.9J
                                                                                                        157
                                                                                                        269J
                                                                                                        143J
                                                                                                          62J
                                                                                                        57.0
                                                                                                         85
                                                                                                        619J
                                                                                                         1.6
 5.5
224J
  .628
 36.3J
299J
349J
190J
  .68
 60.2
 13.1
SOU
 1.2
Al concentrations are hi mHgrwns per Mogrwn (mg/kg = parts per mWon (pom)).
Anatyte not detected hi tnto sample but present hi another.
Semi-quantitative due to QA/QC requirements.
Value Is above Instrument Detection Limit (IDL). but below Contract Required Detection LhnH (CRDL).

-------
                                                                              TABLE 9

                                                          PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS ANALYTICAL RESULTS

                                                                  PUROLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY

             4L^_^«   IHtsnA   *.---- ^B 4^feMt                                                     *44h»»4M^rih     *- ._ 4^^hH                     _M^M^^H  ..  - — _	.
             VMHE   WK^H   JWV <•• IW                                                     MTgDEC  HHP9I e. iwl                     NT9DBC  *ftM TO, «!•»
             Lun4Ui. Arxt   Awl       «ml   «ra>a  Ami   *-«   >Lt»s»  laui   M.Dh*  a am  NJXm   an       *m»   TV    -      AM)   Hmvr-    Arv4      Arm!

                   Moai   aom       MBI   SMS^  ^m   jam
M.3 auMUM-K         MM    M»        NMNMNMNMMMNMNMNM--         -      J     MM     -     -         —        -         -
1.1.1-TAMonMMM         NMNM        NMNMMMNMMMNMMMN/III1—         »    —     MM     MM    —         —        MM         I
TiMoroMM—i            NMNM        MMMMMMMMMMNMNMNMM9         MOMNMMM—0        —        MM        —
                    NMNM        MMMMMMMMNMNMNMWAMMMM       0.01    —     MM     MM    190        —        MM        —


                    MM    NM        MM    NM     MMNMNMNMMMNM     —     —         —     —     MM     N/A    JO        —        MM        —
PCI-1141               MMNM        NMNMN/AMMNMWANMIW--         -     -     H,*     tvt    -        J»000      MM        -



                    40    440        HO    «      »    MO     U9    •     -     —     —     -        -     -     _     «    »        NM       -         -

                    4      a         i      4     m    ixa     aoo    re     O.IM   ajnr   tarn   ojno      OJOT   ooa    jt    130000   a        MM       -         -
                    i»    1400       ion    S40     MOO    m     f4o    no     aiw    —    0040   aoos        «    ojoot    400    1*000   w        MM      14         -
                    140    SB        110    MO     9BO    JJOD     OB    940     O.HJ    —    OJ40   «_•      0.14    —     MOO    11000   B        NM      0.040       OJB
                    140    1JO        109    1«0     MO    1«0»     1*0    BO     -     —     -     U*        —     —     -DO     -10»   -         MM      OMO        -

                    MM        JJ     40     wo    10B     •«     t7     ioojj*i»----        _____         MM
                    m    190        •     aoo     ao    sot    900    ao     OJT    turn   u     OJTS      OJBO   bon    a    19001   "        MM       -        0.1
                    NMNM        MMMMMMNMMMMMNMMM-     ttffN)      Ojn»    —     NM     NM    NM        NM       NM        X,
            uminnmm
           «if«t«u t
                                                                                                                                                 6-23
                                                                                                                        POOR QUALITY
                                                                                                                             ORIGINAL

-------
                                                                           TABLE 9
                                                        PREVIOUS INVESTTGATTONS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                               PUROLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY
  **    Sol
« JSH1   9«1
                                        «n»f
                                        ha
I-M Ok
1.1.1-Ti*
TrtoMW
                                  tat
                                  HIH    MM
                                  MM    N/»
                                  MM    MM

                                  MM    NM
                                                    «n>«  N.OMI  SAMl   MOM COkM  H
                                                    M    M.   SMI    Wxv  «MV   *M
                                                    sal  asei   ast   B 1M1
                                                                                                  OL.    ta.   ac
                                                                                                  001
irnatc  JHO 10.1*11
nmt   tntia—
M    Sot
      ii-11-oj

       joo
       no
                                                                                                                           30


                                                                                                                           10
                                                                                                                                   (el
                                                                                                                                   fi-in-04
PC»-1J«»
CfMW
                   no    n»
                   140    m

                   M    »
                   *      »
                   >•      ISO
                                                     iao    BOB    ra     am    amr    aa»
                                                     tioo    MO    no     an«    —     awo
                                                     WO    MO    VO     aM9    —     03M
                                                                                                   —     —     N     U    »
                                                                                                   —     —     M     -    -
                                                                                                  OJJOT   OJODS    n    IJOMO   a
                                                                                                   i*    OJODO    4io    ixa»   n
                                                                                   aoi
                                                                                                  •ear
                                                                                                              -n»    -no   -
                                                                                                              aw    -     OJT
                                                                                                              •oo    -«o   n
                                                                                                              O.K    -     OJ4
                                                                                                                                    MA       14

                                                                                                                                    m»       a«o
                                                                       air    aaa
             • m>nM>K»Mi m««
             •MtrMCfM Bimn.
        •va-c
                                                                                                                                          6-23
                                                                                                                   POOR  QUALITY

-------
If,
TCL Compounds

1,1-Dichloroelhane
cis-1,2-Dichloroelhene
Trichloroethene
Chloroform
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Chloromethane
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide

TIC Compounds

Unknown Compounds
Unknown Hydrocarbons
                                       I.OJ
                                                              TABIJL 10
                                                     VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                      SURFACE WATER SAMPLES
                                                   VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
                                                   1990 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
                                                  PIIROLATOR PRODUCrS COMPANY
                                      SW-I      SW-2
  SW-IO
(SW-2 Pup.)
0.2J
—
0.03J
—
6J
0.7J
IIJ
0.08J
5J
6J
0.6J
10
0.07J
4
4
SW-3
                                                                          26J
                                                                          24J
                                                                         34UJ
                                                                          O.IJ
                 2.2J
                 7.9J
SW-4
SW-5      SW-6     SW-7
                          5J
                    3J
           O.SJ
                                             0.4J
                                             5J
                                             2J
                    6J

                    O.IJ



                    I.SJ
                                                                                                                 O.SJ
                                                       4J
                    0.9J
         Notes:  All concentrations are in micrograms per liter (ug/l = parts per billion (ppb)).
                Or the compounds detected, only TCE has a guidance value (I Ippb) Tor Class C waters as presented in NYSDEC Water Quality
                Standards, Parts 700-705, effective September I, 1991.
         —  -  Compound not present in this sample but present in another.
         J    -  Semi-quantitative due to concentration below Contract Required Quanlitation Limit (CRQL), data validation requirements or
                compound being a TIC.
         D    =  Contaminant found in associated blank Sumple value is greater than 10 limes the associated blank value.

-------
                                                       TABLE  10  contd.
                                            VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                              SURFACE WATER SAMPLES
                                      SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
                                           1990 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
                                         PIIROLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY

                                                       SWIO
TCLCompounds                  SW I        SW2       (SW2 Dupl     SW3        SW 4       SW5       SW<        SW7

Ms (2 ElhylhexyQphthalale           -                        -            5J          ---         -         BJ          4J
Benzole Acid                                                                                 -         -          3J
1.2Dichlorobenzene               -                        -                                  -         2J          2J


TIC Compounds

Dfcnethylheptadecane              -                        -            52J                   -         19BJ        -
Tetramelhytpenladecane            —           —            —            48J         ...         _         _          _
Trimelhyldodecane                —           —            —            —          —         —         38J          72J
Unknowns                       -           -            -            62J          -         -         192J        990J
Unknown Hydrocarbons            -                        -            462J        -         -         490J        1570J
Unknown Cycle Hydrocarbons       —           •-•            —            —          —         —         28J         —


NOTES:  Al concentration are In mtooo/ams  per liter (ug/l • parts per bMon (ppb)).
        Ol the compounds delected, only 1,2-Otahtof obenzene has a standard (5.0 ppb) tor Class C waters as presented In NYSOEC Water Oualty Standards. Parts
        700-705, eftecltve September t. 199t.
      > Compound not present In this sample but present hi another.
J     • Semi-quantitative due to concentration below Contract Required OuanlHalion Limit (CRQL), data validation requirements or compound being a TIC.

-------
                                           TABLE  10
                                VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                  SURFACE WATER SAMPLES
                                    METALS AND CYANIDE
                               1990 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
                             PUROLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY

Analvte
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
C -ide
NYS
sws
100
1901
NS
5
16
22
110
2185
30
S.22

SW-1
174B
-—
81.8B
.—
_
—
2.7BJ
—
~
_

SW-2
127B
...
149B
._
._
_
_.
—
18.6BJ
_
SW-10
(SW-2 Duo.1
134B
...
L50B
_
_
._
—
._.
17.9BJ
_

SW-3
766
_
1100
5.4
11.6
36.7J
15.7J
~
153
20 SB

SW-4
133B
...
45.8B
—
_
_
_
—
302
413

SW-5
379
3.0B
81.4B
—
...
27.0J
9.9
.~
171
._

SW-6
194BJ
•••
163BJ
77.8J
1290J
29.0J
11JJ
—
335J
...

SW-7
548J
—
24QI
76.61
219QJ
70.8J
28.1J
6121
894J
12.7
Notes:
NYS SWS

NS
1
J
B
All concentrations are in micrograms per liter (ug/1 = parts per billion (ppb)).
New York State Surface Water Standard for Class C waters as presented in NYSDEC Water Quality
Standards, Parts 700-705, effective September 1,1991, based on a reported average hardness of 125 ppm.
No standard.
Dissolved form.
As free cyanide.
Analyte not present in this sample but present in another.
Estimated value due to QA/QC requirements.
Value is  above Instrument Detection Limit  (IDL), but below Contract  Required Detection Limit
(CRDL).

-------
                                                                                    TABLE   11
                                                                       VALID  ANALYTICAL  RESULTS
                                                                         GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
                                                                    VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
                                                                     1990 REMEDIAL  INVESTIGATION
                                                                   PUROLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY

TCL Compounds
Mctnylcnc CWocWtj
1.1-DlcNoroethane
crs-1.2-OtcNoroethene
TrfcNoroetherw
1.1-Olchloroethena
Chloroform
1.1.1-TrlchkHoethane
Vinyl CNorlde
1 .2 -Otchlor oethana
TrlcrMoronuui uinetnana
Isopropyfbenrene
tf vns • i ,2 *OICiWOf octtMfM
CMorotncthsM
Acetone
NYS
OW5
9
9
9
9
9
7
9
2
9
9
9
9
9
90
                                MWU-2
                                       MWD 20
                                      (MWD 1 dup 1   MWD-2    MWO-3   MWD 4   MWD-9   MWO6   MWD-7    MWD*    MWD-9    MWD-10   MWD 11   MWD-1
                                                      41J
                                                      140J
                                                     2J
                                                    41
                                                    190J
                                                     2J
                                                     0.2J
                                                    13J
                                                       19J
                                                                          0.4J
                                                              0.4J
                                                              03J
                                                              0.4J
                                                              0.2J
                                                              0.7J
0.3J
19J
10J
0.3J
6J
                                                                                                      1J
                                                                                             0.4J
                                                                                             0.2J
 U
1601
64J
 1J
0.08J
0.4J
33J
                                                                                                                2J
7J
40J

0.1J
                                                                                                                         0.1J
                                                                                                                         0.3J
                                                                                                                                 0.8J
                                                                                                                                 9
                                                                                                                                 0.09J
                                                                                                                                 0.9J
                                                                                                                                          0.8J
                                                                                                                                                    23J
                                                                                                                                                    1J
                                                                         0.1J
                                                                         OBJ
                                                                                                                                                                      O.JJ
                                                                                                                                                                               •J
                                                                                                                                                                               BBJ
TK Compountfi

Unknown Compounds       NS
Unknown Hydrocartiont     NS
Heune                  NS
                                                    2BJ
                                                              0.9J
                                                                                0.7J
                                         SOJ
                                                                                                            J.4J
                                                                                                            0.9J
                                                                                                                                                                   2.0JN
Notes:
NYS QWS
NS

J
B
N
Al concentrations are ki mfcrograms per tier (ug/l - parts per Mon (ppb)).
New York State Oroundwater Standard as presented In NYSOEC Water OuaDtr Standards. Parts 700-705. effective September 1.1991.
No standard.
Compound not present ki Ms sample, but present ki another.
Seml-quantllatlve due to concentration below Contract Required Ouantltatlon UmN (CROL). data validation requkements or compound being a TIC.
Contaminant found ki associated blank. Sample value Is greater than 10 times Hie associated blank value.
Identified TIC.
ttouriuwaler samples were oJeUed during Ha 1990 M usteq • WaTerra kMrtM pmnp tjatitsOim ol a »ka>fc»s ateel etiCT* wJve and tetton lubkig.  UStFA ftetfon • H4»aaai*j«>
-------
                                                                       TABLE  11  contd.
                                                          VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                             GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
                                                    SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
                                                         1990 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
                                                       I'UROLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY


                                             MWD 20
TCL Compounds              MWU-2   MWD t   (MWD 1 Dm 1  MWO 2   MWD 3   MWD-4   MWD i   MWD-6   MWO7   MWD 8    MWD 9   MWD-10  MWD-11  MWD-12  MWD-13

bis (2-EthytieKyl)phttialate        -       -        —          4J                -        -       -       -       —                -      —       -
Benzole Acid                 •••       —          •          ••                         —   .    •••               —       —       —      3J
2.5-Cyclohexadlcne-1.4-Dlone     —      —         •••                   -       —        8OJN    •••        •        —       —       —       ---       --
Unknown Oxygenated Afcane      •••      —         ---                    •       •-        —       —       •••        —       —       —       10J
1.2 Berwtncdtol.J Fkjoro         -      -         —                           -        -       -       -        -       16JN     -       -
Total Unknowns               -      74J        -                   172J     -         -       -        -        7U      116J     -       20J      32J



NO1ES:            Al concentrations are ki mlerogranis pe> Mogram (itg/kg - parts pv> bMon (ppb))
                  O> tha compounds delected, orty bta<2-Etn|fliei)i«)pMhalate has a standard (SO ppb) as presented In NYSDEC Wdler Quatty Standards. Part* 700-705. effective September 1.1991.
      -           Compound not present In IMs sample but present ki another.
J     •           Semi quantitative due to concentration below CIXH or data validation requirements.

-------
                                               TABLE 11 contd.
                                      VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                       CKOUNDWATEK SAMPLES
                                         METALS AND CYANIDE
                                    1990 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
                                   PUROLA TOR PRODUCTS COMPANY

Analvte
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Silver
Zinc
Cyanide
Notes:
NYS GWS
NS
•*
J
B
NA
F
NYS
GWS
NS
3*
25
1000
3*
10
50
200
25
2
100*
50
300
100
Allc(
- New
• Nost
fllll/fl
» OUIQ
- Tents
B Anal;
- Semi
- Valu<
« Anal]
= Fillei
          MWU-2   MWD-I   MWD-IF
          6360
           NOB
           18.1
           3I.2J
           10 IJ
           104
29800J

 9.2B
 778
 I.6B

 249
 I52J
 36.2J
  .25
 74.1

26IJ
 36.7
12511
NA

75.41)
NA

334J
I5.6B
7.2B
NA
  MWD-20
(MWD-I Dun.)

  22500

    10.2
   917
     I.2B

   296
   I54J
    40.2J

    71.7

   222J
    32.8
                                                         MWD-20F
(MWD-IF Dun.)
I37B
NA
2.2B
76.0B
NA
_--
43.3J
I7.2B
—
—
—
10 IB
NA
MWD-2
29900
—
7.3B
491
• LIB
—
54.0
168
—
.26
88.4
413
—
MWD-3
21100
—
6.5B
547
I.2B
11.3
52.4
148
46.8J
—
62.3
264
36.6
MWD-4
4570
—
3.41)
I7IB
—
35.2
202
73.7J
8.7J
	
86.7
66. IJ
99.4
MWD-4F
I860
—
—
56.3B
—
—
I45J
9.5
—
—
—
5.6B
NA
MWD-
39400
40. IB
300
679
I.5B
55.8
55.0
I200J
IIIJ
5.6
79.1
615
—
All concentrations in micrograms per liter (ug/l ** parts per billion (ppb)).
New York State Groundwater Standard as presented in NYSDEC Water Quality Standards, Parts 700-705. effective September I, 1991.
No standard.
Guidance value.
Tentatively proposed USEPA MCL
Analyte not present in this sample but present in another.
Semi-quantitative value due to QA/QC requirements.
Value is above Instrument Detection Limit (IDL), but below Contract Required Detection Limit (CRDL).
Analyle not analyzed for in this sample.

-------
TABLE  11 (coql'd)

Analvte
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Silver
Zinc
Cyanide
Notes:
NYSGWS -
NS
• „
** m
	 .
J
B
NA
F
NYS
GWS MWD-6
NS 9080
3*
25 3.9B
1000 294
3*
10
50 20.5
200 3I.8J
25 50. IJ
2
100**
50
300 124
100

MWD-7 MWD-8
43300 8<>00
— —
7.IB 3.711
739 517
1.80
6.9
92.8 17.2
274 34.IJ
58.2J 27.8J
.25
117
— —
698 147
— —
All concentrations in micrograms per liter (ug/l •

MWD-9
29600
—
20.4
672
1.411
10.5
960
456
45.8J
.77
338
10.2
254
31.9
> parts per

MWD-IO
6380
—
5.IB
II8B
—
—
27.6
30.9J
6.2J
—
64.1
—
65.0J
—

MWD-
9710

6.8B
237
—
—
47.2
68.7J
I5.3J
—
—
—
106
—


II MWD-IIFMWD-12
I3IB
NA
5.111
II3B
NA
—
_._
9.IB
—
—
—
—
6.3B
NA
95500J
4S.8BJ
—
9IIJ
4.2BJ
—
3I8J
337J
I46J
.25J
290J
...
II80J
—

MWD-13 MWRB-I
4 5 500 J 10211
43.5BJ
6.7BJ
6I3J
I.9BJ
... —
I540J
353J
56.8 J
___ —
602 J
— —
792J I0.7BJ
	 —
billion (ppb)).
New York State Groundwater Standard as presented in NYSDEC Water Quality
No standard.
Guidance value.








Standards.


Parts 700-705,


effective September 1. 1991


Tentatively proposed USEPA MCL
Analyle not present in this
sample but present in
another.





Semi-quantitative value due to QA/QC requirements.
Value is above Instrument
Detection Limit (IDL)
, but below Contract
Required
Detection
Limit (CRDL).

Analyte not analyzed for in this sample.
Filtered sample.








-------
                                                            TABLE  11 contd.
                                                   VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
                                                     GRO1INDWATER SAMPLES
                                                  1986 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
                                                PUROLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY
Compound

 . ,1-Dichloroethene
I-1,2-Dichloroethene
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Tetrachloroethene
Chlorobenzene
Vinyl Chloride
Trichlorofluoromelhane
 1,1-Dichloroethane
Melhylene Chloride
Chloroform
Total Xylenes
D-6   D-7   P-8
 D-8                D-ll
(PUP)  D-9   D-ll  (PUP) D-12   D-i:
PW-3  FT
J.J 	 	 	 	 	 — - 	 	 --- 	 	
31 176 — - 11.5 2.96 189 25.4 23.4 — - 14 Q 12
7 S J Aft S 	 .- - - 	 	 	 	 - - -- 	
140 438 7.3 Q 10.0 13.9 66.5 51.3 55.1 34
inj 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

MO -- 1 1 1 IS O 99

2 1 J
"

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 MR
140 8.85
	 I 
-------
                              TABLE  11 contd.
                      VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                 SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS COMPOUNDS,
                         PESTICIDES AND PCBs
                        GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
                     1986 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
                    PUROLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY
                                                 MWD-11
Compound               MWD-1 MWD-9  MWD-11 (PUP)   MWD-12

Pemachlorophenol         300     —       —       —      —
Bis(2-ethylhexyi)phthalate    7Q      5        3       4       3
4,4'-DDT  '             —      —       —       0.02
Methoxychlor             3.0      —       —       ~      --

NOTES:    All concentrations are in parts per billion (ppb).
—    =    Compound not detected in this sample but present in another.
Q    =    Qualitative due to QA/QC data validation requirements.
                                 6-43

-------
                                                                     TABLE  11  contd.
                                                          VALID ANALYTICAL RESULTS
                                                TOTAL AND DISSOLVED METALS AND CYANIDE
                                                             GROUNDWATER SAMPLES
                                                         1986 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
                                                        PUROLATOK PRODUCTS COMPANY
           MWD-1  MWD-1   MWD 3  MWD 3  MWD 4  MWD 4  MWD 9  MWD 9  MWD 10 MWD-IO MWD II  MWD-11 MWD-11D
Analyle     Total    Fit.      Total    F«.     Total    FIB.	  Total    Fit	  Total   FHt.	 Total    F«.	Total
                                                                                                                 MWD 11D
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Zinc
Cyanide
NOTES:
NA
J
                   42
12 J

280
115
50

65
165 J    -
           10 J

           41
           135
           53
           0.2
                                  0.1
                          208 J   -
           51J
    NA
                           24
                       NA
5J
7
119
68
14
0.1
61
75 J
100
                                                 67
NA
10 J

50
13/
18
0.2
68
130 J
27
                                                                11
                                                                29
Al concentrations are hi parts per bWon (ppb).
D-110 Is duplicate sample of 0-11.
Anaryte nol detected In this sample, but present hi another.
Anaryte nol analyzed for in this sample.
Semi-quantitative value due to QA/QC data validation requirements.
16 J

64      -
86
28
0.1
109     -
251 J    -
        NA
                                      9 J

                                      62
                                      125
                                      21
                                      02
                                      78
                                      162 J
                                                                                              21
                                                                                               O.t
NA
       12 J

       78
       157
       69
       0.1

       218 J
                                                                                                             MWD 12 MWD 12 MWU-2  MWU2
                                                                                                             Total    f».     Total    FMt
41 J

135
193
63

201
566J
                                                                                                      NA
                                                                                           NA
18 J
6
106
355
17

218
648 J
NA
                                                                                                                                                   NA

-------
TABLE 12
SOM4AMT STATISTICS ro* FACET BITS. BT CHEHICAL AMD NBDIOM/AKBA
Hum. Hum. Lov««t Highest Oao«. 95 Pet. Hln. Max.
TIM* 8e*ple« Detected Detected Mean Opp. Conf. Detect. Detect.
Anelyte Detected Anelyted Cone. Cone. Cone. Limit Limit Limit
Vinyl Chloride
Hethylene chloride
1. 1-Dlchloroethehe
1 . 1-Dlchloroethene
cle-1.3-Dlcbloroethene 1
Chloroform
1.2-Dlchloroetbue
1. 1. 1-Trlchloroetnene
Trlchloroetbene
Bthylbenzene
TrlchloroCluoroMthejM
tr«na-l. 2-Dlchloro«tb«n«
I Bopropy lb«nt«n«
••nzolc Acid
bla( 2-Bthylb«xyl|phthalat«
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
11
13
.40 20.
.00 69,
.00 1.
.30 2.
.30 1(0.
.05 2.
.30 0.
.90 11.
.00 190.
.40 0.
.10 19.
.20 2.
.70 0.
.00 3.
.00 4.
AlUHlnua 1J 13 4570.00 tSSOO.
Antimony 3 13 40.10 45.
Araanlo 12 13 3.00 20.
BarluM 13 13 110.00 »11.
B«rylllUM • 13 1.10 4.
C«dalUB 5 13 t.90 55.
ChroMlua 13 13 17.30 1540.
Copper 13 13 30.90 1200.
L««d 12 12 C.20 14C.
ttarcury * " 0.25 5.
Mlckcl 10 13 C2.30 602.
Silver 1 13 10.20 10.
Zinc 13 13 65.00 1100.
Cytnid* 4 13 31.90 99.
Tin 1 13 1C. 10 1C.
0.04
1.91
o.oc
0.«9
5.70
0.59
0.09
1.09
9.69
0.91
0.02
0.03 . 1.
0.95 . 1.
20.62 . SO.
4.91 . 10.
20016.06
21.54 . 35.
5.25 . 2.
450.14
1.04 . 1.
5.20 . . 5.
6.
20.
12.
1.
1.
12.
12.
5.
1.
12.
10.
12.
12.
50.
10.
*
35.
2.
•
1.
S.





















104.24 .
144.06
36.19
0.21 ' . 0. 0,2
03.12 . 39. 39.0
4.30 . 0. 0.0
257.05
9.02 . 10. 10.0
0.39 . IS. 15.9

-------
                                         TABLE 12  contd.
                      SOMtAKY STATISTICS POR FACET SITB. BT CHEMICAL AND MBDION/AMBA

                     	 TTPB-Oroundvat«r (Filtered) 	
Anelyt*
  Hum.
  TlB««
D«C«ct«d
                          NUM.
                         Sanplca
Areenlo
Berltm
chroeilua
copper
lino
D«t«cc«d
  Cone.

 131.00
   2.20
  SC.30
  3t.3S
   ».10
   S.iO
 Highest
O«t«et«d
  Cone.

 IOC.00
   S.10
 113.00
 145.00
  1C.40
   o.ts
 o<
 Mean
 Cono.

147.230
  2.23t
 70.304
 25.552
 11.234
  t.733
  fS Pet.
Opp. conC.
   LlMlC
  Hln.
O«t«ct.
 Limit
Detect.



   e
   2
   e
   C

-------
                                       TABLE  12 contd.
                     BONNART STATISTICS rOK FACET 8ITB,  BT CHBHICAL AMD MSDIOM/ARRA

                    —	—-- TYPE'droundwater (Background)  -—-----------—.-
Analyte
  MUM.
  TlM«
D«t«ct«d
  NUM.
 Samples
Analyxcd
Bar tun
ChroMluai
Copper
Lead
tine
Detected
  Cone.
                         CJCO.
                          140.
                           !•.
                           II.
                           10.
                          104.
 Highest
Detected
  Cone.
Oeo«.
Hean
Cone.
  tS ret.
Opp. Cent.
   Llalt
  Kin.
Detect.
 Llnlt
  Men.
Detect.
 Llalt
•360.0
140.0
10.1
31.2
10.1
104.0
•360.0
140.0
10.1
31. >
10.1
104.0

-------
TABLE 12 contd.
flOMMARY STATISTICS FOR FACET SITB. BT CHEMICAL AMD HBDIOM/ARBA
NUM.
Tla.ee
Analyta Datactad
Matbylana Cblorlda
Acatona
1,2-Dlcbloroatnana (total)
2-Butanona
Trlchloroathana
Ch lorobanzana
' Benzole Acid
Maphtbalana
2-Hethylnapbtbalana
Aeanapbthana
Dlbenzofuran
Fluorana
Pan t acb loropbanol
Pbanantbrana
Anthraeana
Dl-n-butylphtbalata
Fluoranthana
Pyrana
Benzol a) antbraeana
Chryaana
bla( 2-BthylheByl)pbthelate
Banxo(b) (luorantbana
Benzoi k) fluor an thane
Banzo( a)pyrana
Indanof 1, 2,3-ed)pyrena
Dibenzof a, h) anthracene
Benzol g.h, Dperylene
Aroclor-124* S
Aroclor-1254 1
AluMlnue) 7
Areenio 7
Be clue) 7
BerylliUM 7
CadnluM S
Chroaiua 7
Hum.
Baaplaa
Analyzed
7
7
7
7
7
7





















7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
Lowest Hlflheat
Datactad
Cone.
22.00
5.00
1.00
9.00
2.00
1.00
•90.00
55.00
45.00
260.00
200.00
250.00
49.00
• 4.00
560.00
60.00
100.00
• 4.00
66.00
54.00
72.00
52.00
52.00
51.00
490.00
190.00
440.00
320.00
1000.00
6760.00
5.40
08.40
0.39
2.90
10.60
Datactad
Cone.
22.00
34.00
4.00
9.00
5.00
1.00
••0.00
7600.00
3000.00
•300.00
4900.00
•400.00
54.00
77000.00
10000.00
110.00
110000.00
65000.00
43000.00
32000.00
430.00
69000.00
69000.00
33000.00
16000.00
5200.00
17000.00
11000.00
1000.00
16400.00
247.00
2510.00
7.60
76.90
1220.00
aeon. 95 Pet.
Mean Opp. Conf.
Cone. LI* It
5.00
7.20
2.54
5.97
2.M .
2.49
•36.06
•11.40
245.90
515.01
421.14
512.60
215.16
1332.59
747.41
126.42
1760.94
1290.79
••6.69
701.53
158.10
1265.06
1265.06
933.39
755.02
3*6.74
753. (6
756.15
200.01
10*65.77
17.39
334.8*
0.75
5.75
85.64
Hln.
Detect.
Limit
5.00
10.00
5.00
10.00
5.00
5.00
1*00.00
370.00
370.00
370.00
370.00
370.00
1800.00
370.00
370.00
300.00
370.00
370.00
370.00
370.00
370.00
370.00
370.00
370.00
370.00
370.00
370.00
90.00
170.00
e
.
.
.
1.10
•
Max.
Detect.
LlBlt
1*.00
14.00
6.00
12.00
6.00
7.00
2000.00
300.00
370.00
410.00
410.00
410.00
1*00.00
370.00
410.00
410.00
370.00
370.00
370.00
370.00
410.00
370.00
370.00
410.00
410.00
410.00
410.00
91.00
1000.00
,
*
*
,
1.30
*

-------
TABLE 12 contd.
(Continued)


Anelyte
copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
BelenlUM
Thai llua
line
Cyenlde
Tin
NUM.
Tlaee
Detected
7
7
4
t
1
1
7
S
a
NUM.
•••plee
Analysed
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
Lowest Highest
Detected
Cone.
24.60
14.10
0.12
20.00
11.00
16.70
44.10
0.63
5.40
Detected
Cone.
1210.00
292.00
0.51
224.00
11.00
16.70
2040.00
10.70
15.50
Oeoa. 95 Pet.
Mean Opp. Conf.
Cone. Lie It
110.42
41.70
0.12
41.00
0.63
0.43
200.44
1.40
2.97
Mln.
Detect .
LlMlt
.
.
.10
.40
.43
.43
.
.54
.50
Hex.
Detect.
LlMlt
.
.
.11
.40
.30
.52
.
.63
.20

-------
TABLE 12 contd.
SUMMARY STATISTICS POK
Nu*. NUM.
Tlaiaa Saaplaa
Analyta Datactad Analytad
Acatona
Carbon DlaulClda
1, 1-Dlchloroatbana
1,2-Dlchloroatbaaa (total)
Ctilorofon
2-Butanona
1, 1. 1-Trlcbloroatbaoa
Trlcbloroathana 2
Benzene
Tetrechloroe thane
Toluana
Bthylbantana
•tyrana
Xylana (total)
N-Nltroao-Dl-a-propylaalne
Bantolc Acid
Naphthalana
2 -Hathylnaphtbalana
Acanaphthylan*
Acanaphthana
Dlbansofuran
Pluorana
N-Nltroaodlphaaylaalna
Pantachlorophanol
Phananthrana
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
70
71
71
70
71
60
60
70
70
60
69
69
70
60
60
71
Anthracana 2 69
Dl-n-butylphthalata 7 69
Pluorantbana 10 70
Pyrana 7 70
Butylbenzylphthalata 2 69
Benzo( •) anthracene 5 70
Chryaene 7 71
bl*(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 22 70
Dl-n-octylphthalate 4 70
Benzo( b|f luoranthana 3 69
FACET 8ITB.
Lowe at
Detected
Cone.
7.00
1.00
1.00
2.00
S.OO
2.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
7.00
1.00
2.00
400.00
67.00
S6.00
120.00
47.00
77.00
580.00
130.00
42.00
66.00
44.00
530.00
44.00
40.00
45.00
160.00
40.00
110.00
40.00
74.00
69.00
BY CHEMICAL
Hlgheat
Detected
Cone.
170.00
4.00
S.OO
110.00
S.OO
29.00
10.00
240.00
3.00
1.00
210.00
520.00
1.00
760.00
400.00
2100.00
1200.00
1550.00
360.00
670.00
500.00
1050.00
42.00
66.00
S350.00
965.00
500.00
4700.00
3250.00
100.00
2000.00
2450.00
1200.00
340.00
3650.00
AND MRDItM/ARBA
OeoM.
Mean
Cone..
.52
.04
.03
.44
.90
.74
.09
.25
.06
.03
.10
.10
.03
.33
109.10
707.31
192.29
197.17
105.33
100.41
190.27
193.32
103.14
074.77
105.02
194.70
172.57
173.53
107.34
106.60
193.74
200.00
152.54
106.10
190.42
95 Pet.
0pp. Conf.
tli














•It
.03
.96
.02
.24
.90
.36
.05
.62
.00
.95
.01
.54
.95
.24
194.41
1112.01
315.52
226.60
196.66
200.01
190.20
200.97
193.96
900.16
241.97
210.61
190.00
230.42
223.03
180.00
226.15
234.45
216.49
193.97
224.41
Mln.
Detect.
Limit
10.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
11.00
S.OO
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
340.00
1400.00
340.00
340.00
340.00
340.00
340.00
340.00
340.00
1600.00
340.00
340.00
340.00
340.00
340.00
340.00
340.00
340.00
340.00
340.00
340.00
Max.
Detect.
LlMlt
79.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
92.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
430.00
2100.00
430.00
430.00
430.00
430.00
430.00
430.00
430.00
2100.00
430.00
430.00
420.00
430.00
430.00
' 430.00
430.00
430.00
430.00
430.00
430.00

-------
TABLE 12 contd.
(Continued)

Analyte
Bencot k) f luoranthene
Benso(a)pyrene
IndenoC l,a.3-cd)pyrene
Dlbenxot a.h) anthracene
Beoiolo.h.Dperylene
Aroclor-1240
Aroclor-1254
MUMlnua
Antimony
Arvenlc
Barlua
Berylllua
Cadnlun
CbroBlua
copper
Lead
Mercury •
H'ckel
a Iver
Sine
Cyanide
Tin
Nun.
TIM*
Detected
71
70
71
67
29
71
71
71
21
71
6
71
27
I

Nun. Low«at Highest
Samples Detected Detected
Analysed " 	 •*—
69
69
69
69
69
71
70
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71
71

Cone.
69.00
1700.00
690.00
360.00
605.00
140.00
190.00
7170.00
0.60
1.50
33.30
0423
1.30
12.50
3.70
3.60
0.12
16.90
1.00
40.20
0.57
4.20

konv.
3650.00
1700.00
690.00
360.00
605.00
31500.00
310.00
20100.00
23.70
32.40
031.50
1.10
3390.00
13000.00
1910.00
161.50
1.95
S16.00
7.90
3460.00
167.00
193.00

Oaon.
Hean
Cone •
190.42
193.34
190.75
100.96
190.73
62.04
95.90
12434.26
4.26
5f>*
a 02
109.43
• «*
e 1J
2.52
53.03
34.19
14.70
011*1
• vy
36.09
In*
• Q J
110.30
0.75
2. SI

95 Pet.
Opp. ConC.
LlMlt
224.41
212.26
200.14
360.00
200.05-
173.10
105.21
14011.09
4.70
7.71
142.45
O.SS
04.36
301.63
109.00
20.30
0.10
S3. 43
1.22
200.56
4.53
S.73

Mln.
Detect.
LlBlt
340.00
340.00
340.00
340.00
340.00
04.00
170.00
7ilO
3.70
0.21
1.00
•
•
0.10
•
1.40
O.S4
3.20

Max.
Detect.
LlBlt
430.00
430.00
430.00
430.00
430.00
100.00
1000.00
9.30
2.70
e
0.34
1.30
e
• .
0.13
•
2.10
0.63
4.20


-------
TABLE 12 contd.
SUMMARY STATISTICS FOR FACET SITE
NUM. Nu«. Loweet
Tlnee Saaploe Detected
Analyte Detected Analyzed Cone.
Toluene
Ch lorobentene
Naphthalene
2-Hethylnaphthelene
Acenaphthene
Dlbensofuran
Olethylphtbalete
Pluorene
Phenantbrene
Anthracene
Pluoranthene
Pyrene
Benzol •) anthracene
Chryaene
• B«nzo(b)f luoranthene
Benzol k) f luorantnene
Benzol a) pyrene
indenol 1. 3, 3-cd)pyrene
Dlbensof a, h) anthracene
Benzol g, h. 1 ) perylene
AluMlnuai
Araenlc 4
Barlu*
Beryl HUM
CadejlUM
ChroBlUM
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Zinc
Cyanide
Tin

































2.00
1.00
15000.00
5600.00
21000.00
13000.00
71.00
22000.00
55.00
50000.00
79.00
(9.00
50.00
130000.00
40.00
330000.00
130000.00
35000.00
13000.00
34000.00
10900.00
3.40
90.00
0.60
41.40
10.50
23.50
11.40
0.24
22.00
75.10
4.30
0.40
, BY CHEMICAL
Ntoheet
Detected
Cone.
2.00
1.00
15000.00
5600.00
21000.00
13000.00
71.00
22000.00
190000.00
50000.00
320000.00
210000.00
160000.00
130000.00
330000.00
330000.00
130000.00
35000.00
12000.00
34000.00
13600.00
10.90
319.00
0.67
41.40
45.10
502.00
50.30
0.43
129.00
675.00
4.30
0.40
AND MEDIUM/AREA
Oeoei. 95 Pet.
Mean Opp. Conf.
Cone. Llnlt
2.62
2.00
036.34
602.21
935.61
797.39
119.16
950.23
1270.54
1312.70
1716.34
1425.72
1169.61
1717.92
1302.00
2343.47
1717.92
1109.29
776.39
1090.62
12444.27
5.70
170.04
0.63
2.10
31.57
70.75
20.14
0.30
45.01
150.13
0.65
2.01

Mln.
Detect.
Limit
6.00
6.00
390.00
390.00
390.00
390.00
400.00
390.00
400.00
390.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
390.00
400.00
390.00
390.00
390.00
390.00
390.00
.
.
.
.
1.00
.
.
.
.
.
.
0.51
3.20

Ma*.
Detect.
Limit
6.00
6.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
400.00
• 400.00
400.00
.400.00
e
.
e
.
1.00
.
.
.
.
.
.
O.S1
• 3.30

-------
                                                     TABLE 12 contd.
                              a
-------
                                        TABLE  12  contd.
                              SUMMARY STATISTICS FOR FACET SITE,  BT CHEMICAL AMD MEDIOH/ARBA
                                      TTPB-Plent 2 Yard Soll-fiubaurf.  (190C date)
                              Mu
Analyte

trana-1.2-Dlcbloroethene
1,1.1-TrIchloroethane
Trlchloroethene
Tetrachloroethene
1.2-Dlchlorob«ns«n«
TricbloroCluoroM«chMi«
 S
10
!•
 4
 1
 1
           NUM.
          Saapla*
         Analyzed
21
21
21
21
 txnraat
D*t«ct«d
  Cone.

   S.T5
   • .04
   3.46
   7.31
  14.30
  14.20
D«t«ct«d
  Cone.

   22.2
   23.7
  tlO.O
  150.0
   14.3
   14.2
 Mean
 Cone.

 1.2740
 9.0790
17.3334
 2.00SC
 1.0009
14.2000
  95 Pet.
Opp. Conf.
   LlBlt

   4.3440
  14.5403
  •1.9965
  22.305
   1.C949
  Mln.
Detect.
 LlBlt

  1.30
  0.50
  3.20
  0.30
  1.90
  Hex.
Detect.
 LlBlt

   1.3
  19.0
   4.4
   4.0
   1.9

-------
TABLE 12 contd.
8UHMAMT STATISTICS FOR FACET 8 ITS, BT CHEMICAL AMD MBDIOM/ARBA
HUM. MUM. Lowest Highest Oeo*. 95 Vet. Min. Me*.
Tl*ee 8aaple» Detected Detected Mean Opp. ConC. Detect. Detect.
Analyte Detected Analysed Cone. Cone. Cone. Llalt Llalt Llait
Ace ton*
Phenanthren*
Pluoranthenej
Pyrene
B«nao( •) anthracene
Cnryeene
Benzo(b) fluoranthen*
Bensot k) f luoranthen*
Benso( e)pyrene
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd) pyren*
B«nco(a.b,l)perylene
AluBlnu*
Areenlo
Barlua
Beryl HUM
ChroeiluM
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Mlckel
lino





















5.00 5.00 5.63 . 11.
120.00 120.00 162.69 . 350.
220.00 220.00 199.10 . 350.
220.00 220.00 199.10 . 350.
140.00 140.00 171.25 . 350.
120.00 120.00 162.68 . 350.
230.00 230.00 202.07 . 350.
230.00 230.00 202.07 . 350.
130.00 130.00 167.08 . 350.
53.00 53.00 123.09 . 350.
CO. 00 CO. 00 129.12 . 350.
. 13.0
410.0
410.
410.
410.
410.
410.
410.
410.
410.
410.
14400.00 1C300.00 15347.00
4.00 7.40 5.14
•7.90 103.00 94. CC
0.50 0.71 O.C2
18.80 42.20 25.70
4.80 5.90 5.20
12.90 33.40 20.05
0.15 0.85 0.19 . 0.1 0.1
1C. 00 30. CO 22.91
72.70 105.00 90.22

-------
TABLE 12 contd.
8DHHART STATISTICS FOR FACET SITE, BT CHEMICAL
Mum. Mum. Loweet Highest
Tlmee Samples Detected
Analyte Detected Analyzed Cone.
2-Butanone
Trlchloroetbene
Toluene
4-Methylphenol
Benzole Acid
Naphthalene
4-Chloro-3-methylpbenol
2-Hethylnaphthelene
Acenaphthylene
Acenapbthene
Dlbenzofuran
Fluorene
Pentechloropheaol
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Dl -n-buty Iphtbalate
Fluoranthane
Pyrane
Benzot a) anthracene
Chryaene
bla( 2-EthylbexyUphtbalata
Benzo(b) fluor an thane
Benzot k) fluor an thane
Benzot a) pyrene
Indenot 1.2.3-cd)pyrene
Dlbenzot a, b) anthracene
Benzot a. h.llperylene
Heptechlor epoxlde
Dleldrln
Aroclor-1254
Aroclor-1260
Aluminum
Antimony
Araanle
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead







































1.00
2.00
2.00
50.00
130.00
45.00
140.00
45.00
72.00
67.00
51.00
73.00
440.00
04.00
92.00
67.00
140.00
100.00
100.00
74.00
53.00
100.00
100.00
07.00
50.00
56.00
62.00
31.00
39.00
210.00
240.00
9360.00
10.60
3.20
203.50
0.37
4.70
32.70
21.00
as. oo
Detected
Cone.
1.00
6.00
2.00
300.00
640.00
550.00
140.00
690.00
140.00
040.00
540.00
600.00
440.00
0300.00
950.00
390.00
20000.00
13000.00
11000.00
11000.00
1500.00
30000.00
30000.00
11000.00
6000.00
1500.00
6300.00
31.00
39.00
6000.00
240.00
21100.00
10.60
15.70
512.00
0.71
213.00
2035.00
470.00
210.00
AND HEDION/ARBA
Oeom. 95 Pet.
Mean 0pp. Conf.
Cone. Limit
5.61
3.65
3.39
213.07
500.07
235.57
232.04
260.69
140.05
226.03
210.40
221.44
1043.52
1003.19
254.21
190.40
1730.20
1257.24
1111.55
939.70
294.01
1945.75
1945.75
055.29
403.73
309.32
554.10
7.05
14.92
050.07
143.15
13336.37
5.34
5.30
311.74
O.SS
33. iO
100.06
202.54 .
103.37 .

Mln.
Detect.
Limit
12.0
6.0
6.0
370.0
1900.0
370.0
370.0
.
370.0
370.0
370.0
370.0
1000.0
^
370.0
370.0
*
• •
*
*
370.0
.
,
.
370.0
370.0
370.0
9.0
10.0
290.0
100.0
a
0.1
2.3
.
.
.
•
•
t

Max.
Detect.
Limit
10.0
9.0
9.0
760.0
3700.0
370.0
760.0
.
760.0
760.0
740.0
760.0
3700.0
.
370.0
760.0
.
.
.
.
7(0.0
.
.
.
370.0
760.0
370.0
60.0
140.0
1400.0
1400.0
.
12.7
2.3
.
.
.
.
t
t

-------
                                                           TABLE 12  contd.
                                                        IContinued)
                                            TVPE-aedlHent-Oreln Swele (flurf.)
Analyte

Mercury
Nickel
Zlno
cyanide
Tin
  HUH.
  Ti«e«
Detected

    9
    9
    *
  Nua.
 Saaple*
Analysed
 Lowect
Detected
  Cone.

    e.2i
   30.90
  119.00
    0.82
    S.10
 Highest
Detected
  Cone.

    0.99
  003.25
  964.00
   Cl.OO
   U.70
 Oeo*.
 Heen
 Cone.

  0.57
 75. (•
433.01
  3.1«
  S.47
  95 ret.
Opp. ConC.
   LlMlt
  Mln.
Detect.
 LlMlt
  Hex.
Detect.
 Ll«lt
                                                                             3.7
                                                                            3.7

-------
TABLE 12 contd.
SUMMARY STATISTICS FOR FACET SITE, BY CHEMICAL AND MEDIUM/AREA


Analyte
Trlchloroethene
Nitrobenzene
Benzole Acid
1,2.4-Trlchlorobenteoe
Naphthalene
2-M«thylnaphthaleae
Acenaphthylene
Acenephthene
Dlbenzofuran
Fluorene
Phenanthrea*
Anthracene
Dl-n-butylphthalate
Fluoran thane
pyrene
Benzot a) anthraceae
Chryaene
bla( a-Kthylhexyllphthalate
Benzo(b) C luorantbane
Benzol k) fluor an thane
Banzo(a)pyrane
lndeno< 1,2,3-cdlpyrene
Dlbenzo( a, h) anthracene
Benzol o.h, Dperylane
Aroclor-1254
AlUBlnUM
Araenle
BarluB
Beryl lUm
CadMlua
ChroalUB
Copper
Load
Mercury
Nickel
line
Cyanide
Tin
Nua.
TlMe
Detected










•-














12
0
12
12
7
12
12
12
6
12
12
5
a
NUB. Loweat Hlgheet Oaoau 95 Pot.
Sa«plea
Analysed
ia
la
la
la
la
la
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
ia
Detected
Cone.
3.00
470.00
00.00
46.00
60.00
110.00
59.00
51.00
160.00
59.00
43.00
76.00
140.00
45.00
55.00
54.00
43.00
40.00
43.00
00.00
52.00
50.00
42.00
51.00
1100.00
12100.00
2.40
126.00
0.30
1.50
16.00
4.40
11.00
0.11
20.90
50.30
0.74
S.20
Detected
Cone.
0.
470.
02.
46.
330.
540.
76.
51.
160.
OS.
5(0.
76.
140.
090.
520.
530.
400.
02.
1300.
1300.
440.
130.
63.
160.
3400.
35100.0
23.0
637.0
1.0
01.5
200.0
217.0
126.0
2.3
(0.1
306.0
K.7
C.O
Mean 0pp. Conf.
Cone. Halt
3.30
219.30
635.09
100.60
190.05
206.11
166.05
179.04
196.94
160.41
173.07
105.10
194.76
176.96
173.55
174.90
166.34
160.05
103.03
306.07
160.69
173.54
101.90
174.69
150.10
17313.40
3.07
233.74
0.64
3.57
36.13
17.36
31.30
0.14
30.37
90.44 .
0.65
a. 34
Mln.
Detect.
LlMlt
6.00
300.00
1000.00
300.00
300.00
300.00
300.00
300.00
300.00
300.00
300.00
300.00
300.00
300.00
300.00
300.00
300.00
300.00
300.00
300.00
300.00
300.00
300.00
300.00
100.00
.
0.50
*
.
1.10
.
. .
.
0.10
.
.
0.57
J.70
Max.
Detect.
Llalt
7.00
470.00
2100.00
470.00
430.00
430.00
430.00
430.00
430.00
430.00
430.00
430.00
430.00
430.00
430.00
430.00
430.00
430.00
430.00
430.00
430.00
430.00
430.00
430.00
310.00
.
3.30
.
.
. 1.30
.
.
.
0.13
.
.
0.66
4. CO

-------
TABLE 12 contd.
SONMARY STATISTICS FOR FACET SITE. BT CHEMICAL
Num. NUM. Lowest
Times Samples Detected
Analyte Detected Analysed Cone.
Hethyleno Chloride
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
•yrene
Benzol a) anthracene
chryeene
bls( 2-Ethylhexyllphthalste
Benzo(b) Cluoranthene
Benzol k) Cluoranthene
Benzol a) pyrene
Indenol 1.2.3-cd)pyrene
Benso(g,h,l)perylene
Aroclor-1240
Aluminum
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
nickel
Potassium
Vanadium
Zinc
Cyanide















.
















0.00
500.00
1200.00
630.00
560.00
1700.00
2300.00
1400.00
2300.00
2000.00
2000.00
1100.00
1000.00
1100.00
5400.00
7.50
130.00
9(.20
1*200.00
225.00
(.00
200.00
14100.00
40.30
4130.00
165.00
0.20
47.10
•10.00
11.00
572.00
7.10
UB. 9»AI*.eltf V w"»
Hlgheat
Detected
Cone.
0.00
4400.00
1200.00
0500.00
•300.00
4000.00
4000.00
1400.00
4000.00
3700.00
3900.00
2000.00
1000.00
1100.00
((80.00
13.20
390.00
003.00
17(000.00
4340.00
(.00
2070.00
20400.00
111.00
5170.00
(32.00
0.32
202.00
1120.00
15.40
7730.00
7.10
AMD MEDIOM/ARBA
Oeom. 95 Pet.
Mean Opp. Conf.
Cone. Limit
7.01
15(4.31
1909.02
2523.25
2557.74
2445.21
2873.00
2460.69
2704.43
2515.11
2559.43
1(70.63
1570.01
253.16
S999.79
10.19
222.00
225.51
(97(3.70
•(3.35
3.49
712.53
1(133.70
(0.4(
4700.02
345.94
0.31
115.27
538.89
0.09
1(52.10
1.09

Mln.
Detect.
Limit
14.0
*
4300.0
*
e
4300.
4300.
4300.
4300.
4300.
4300.
4300.
4300.
100.
B
%
e
e
^
B
4.«
9
#
9
i
^
i
t
345.0
0.3
.
0.0

Man.
Detect.
Limit
17.00
e
(100.00
e
.
4300.00
4300.00
9900.00
4300.00
4300.00
4300.00
4300.00
4300.00
590.00
t
e
e
e
t
e
3.20
e
m
e
t
B
e
e
345.00
0.30
^
0.92

-------
                                              TABLE  12 contd.
 Analyta

 Acetone
 Naphthalene
 2-Methylnapbtnalene
 Acenaphthana
 Dlbanxoturaa
 Pluorene
 Phananthrana
 Anthracene
 Plueraothaaa
 Pyrana
 Benio(•)antbracaaa
 Chryaene
 blat2-Ktbylbe>yl)pbtbalate
 Benso(b)fluoranthena
 Baniolk)fluorantbene
Benio(a)pyrana
Indano(l,2,:
 Barlua
 Beryl Hua
 Cadalua
 Calclua
 Chroalua
 Cobalt
 Xron
 Lead
 Hagnealua
 Manganeaa
 Mercury
 Nickel
 Potaaalua
Vanadium
Xlno
                                 ^
                                 •*tact.<|

1
Bi
Jit












""•• u>v..t
'•Plea Datactad
lyzad (v»i<.
* ~ •• WOOC.
290.00
3600.00
2500.00
•400.00
4900.00
7(00.00
55000.00
14000.00
50000.00
56000.00
29000.00
26000.00
990.00
36000.00
50000.00
22000.00
6300.00
5900.00
11300.00
22.00
195.00
1.20

24.10
6390.00
92.20
0.40
21900.00
53.80
3930.00
276.00
0A -
.06
23.90
1630.00
19.60
M •* A j. —
4 jf .00
	 * WMJf |
Hlghaat
Detected
Cone.
290.00
3(00.00
2500.00
•400.00
4900.00
7COO.OO
55000.00
14000.00
50000.00
5(000.00
29000.00
2(000.00
990.00
3(000.00
50000.00
22000.00
(300.00
5900.00
11300.00
22.00
195.00
14A
• afO
94 t A
«* • 10
€390.00
92.20
• An
• VII
21900.00
53.80
3930.00
9?£ A A
i'O .00
0.0(
23.90
1(30.00
19.60
439.00

2T .J'S':
•—. i£l' •2T- °"
"»»a)it Limit tl
290.00
3(00.00
2500.00
•400.00
4900.00
7(00.00
55000.00
14000.00
50000.00
56000.00
29000.00 ' * <
26000.00 ' * •
990.00
36000.00
50000.00
22000.00
•300.00
5900.00
11300.00
22.00
195.00
19A •
• al V •
24.10
C390.00
92.20
a
0.40
21900.00
53.80 ' '
3930.00
276.00
041f • •
.86 •
23.90
1(30.00 '
19.60
439.00

la«.
•act.
•1C
a
• 1
• 1
a I
a 1
t 1
• 1
» 1
1

1


1
1

1
1

-------
TABLE 12 contd.
SOMMAMT STATISTICS rO« f*CBT SITE.
•JtVDffe* A a* ft 1 fBflint —
HUH. Nun. Loweet
Tlaee Sa»pl«e Detected
An.lyt. "•t-C"d *n'l¥"d CO"C'
t •» 00
Vinyl Chloride
1, l-Dlchloroeth«n«
1.2-Dlchloroethene ( total)
1.1. l-Trlehloroethene
Trlehloroethen*
Acenaphthene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Dl-n-butylphtbaUt*
riuoranthene
Pyrene
Benxot •) •nthrMWM
Chryeene
ble( 2-«thylhemyl)P»>th«l«t«
Dl-n-octylphthelate
Bento(b) f luoranthen*
Benxo( k) fluorenthen*
Benio(a)pyrene
lndeno(1.2,3-cdlpyt«i«
B«nzo(«,h,i)p«ryl«n«
Heptachlor epoxld*
Aroclor-1240
AlUMlnUB
Areenlc
Barluai
Beryl llua
CadaluM
Chroailua
Copper «
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Zinc
2 3.00
2.00






























1 Cyanide
11.00
130.00
71.00
170.00
50.00
59.00
345.00
230.00
205.00
195.00
46.00
130.00
395.00
395.00
205.00
99.00
99.00
15.00
540.00
9290.00
4.90
140.50
0.36
25.10
732.00
33.70
17.00
0.22
S3. 25
106.00
0.74


BT CHEMICAL
Htoheet
Detected
Cone.
2.00
3.00
43.00
11.00
130.00
71.00
450.00
130.00
59.00
720.00
520.00
430.00
' 340.00
71.00
130.00
690.00
690.00
350.00
99.00
99.00
15.00
540.00
9420.00
11.30
229.00
0.36
34.00
1200.00
40.45
19.60
0.22
119.00
120.00
1.75


AND HBDIOH/MIBA
Deo*. 95 Pet.
Mean OPP- Conf.
Cone. LlMlt
3.67
3.12 •
9.27
5.90
20.55
124.27
276.59
00.62
112.63
490.40
345.03
350.07
257.49
57.15
167.10
522.06
522.06
267.06
145.09
145.09
0.66
.164.32
9354.77
7.44
179.37
0.22
29.21
967.97
3«.92
18.60 1
0.11
79.60
116.40
1.14



Hln. Hax.
Detect. Detect.
LlBlt Limit
13.50 13.50
6.50 6.50
• •
6.50 6.50
6.50 6.50
435.00 435.00
. •
• •
•30.00 430.00
. •
• •
. •
. •
• •
•30.00 430.00
• •
. •
• •
•30.00 430.00
430.00 430.00
10.00 10.00
100.00 100.00
e •
• •
e •
0.2C 0.2C
e . •
• •
• •
• •
0.12 0.12
• •
4 *
»



-------
TABLE 12 contd.
SUMMARY STATISTICS FOR FACET SITE, BY CHEMICAL
Mu*. NUB. Loveee Hloheee
TlBea Samplee Detected
Analyte * Detected Analyzed Cone.
Carbon Dl suicide
Trlchloroetbeae
2-Methylnaphthalane
Benzot a) anthracene
Cbryeene
ble( a-lcbylbeayDphtbalate
Benzol b) f luorantbene
Aroclor-1241
AluBlniw
AntlBoay
Areenlo
Barltui
CadMlUB
ChroBlm
Copper
L«ad
Mercury
Mlckel
silver
Zlne
Cyanide
Tin
15.00
o.so
72.00
3400.00
2045.00
2200.00
ISO. 00
3300.00
7550.00
11.70
4.10
310.00
•22.00
3940.00
459.00
110.00
0.52
190.00
2.40
3000.00
25.50
•32.50
Detected
Cone.
15.00
0.50
72.00
3400.00
2045.00
7300.00
ISO. 00 •
11450.00
7440.0*
22.00
7.2S
731. SO
013.00
•735.00
944.50
290.50
0.94
404.00
«.«•
11050.00
39.40
435.00
AMD MBDION/AMA
Oeo*. 95 Fct. Mln. MaM.
Mean 0pp. Conf. Detect. Detect.
Cone. LlMlt Limit Limit
7.75 . 0 0
5.93 . 0 •
72.00
940.21 . 520 520
729.10 . 820 520
4007.49
ISO. 00
•144.95
7594.97 . . ' .
1«.04
S.4S
402.30
711.12
5044.51
««5.3«
101.20 . . .
0.70
310.21
' 3.4C
(790.71
31.70
433.75

-------
                                      TABLE 12 contd.
Analyt*

ChloroMtbui*
cl*-l, 3-Dlchloro«tb«n*
Chlorofom
   80TMARY STATISTICS POM PACBT BITE, BY CHEMICAL AND MKDIOH/AMRA

	 TYPE'Burf. tUt«r-May» Crk.  (Dpard) 	

   HUM.         MUM.
   TlM«      8»pl«B
 D«t«cC«d    Analyzed
 Lowe«c
D«t«cc«d
  Cone.
 Highest
D«t*ct«d
  Cone.
O«o*.
M««n
Cone.
                                                                                      »s  ret.
                                                                                   Opp.  Conf.
  Mln.
O«t«ct.
 Limit
  MAM.
D«t«ct.
 Limit
Mrim
   C.OO
   • .20
   0.03
 174.00
  01.00
   >. 70
«.oo
0.20
0.03
174.00
01.00
2. 70
(.00
0.20
0.03
174.00
• 1.00
a. 70

-------
TABLE 12 contd.
8OMMART STATISTICS fOR FACET SITE. BT CHEMICAL
Nua. NUM. Loweet Hlgheet
Tlaea Beetplee Detected
Anelyte Detected Analyied Cone.
Acetone
Mltrobeniene
Naphthalene
2 -Methy Inaphtbelene
Aeenephthene
DlbenxoCurea
Fluorene
Phen enthrone
Ji ithrecene
Pluorentbene
Pyrene
ble< 2-Ethylhexyl>phtbelete
Bensoi b) C luorenthene
Benso< k) f luorentbene
Ben*o( e ) pyrene
Indenof 1. 2. 3-cdl pyrene
Dlbenio( e , b) anthrecene
Benso(0,h.l)perylene
Al:i«lnua
At ienla
Barium
CedMluM
CbroMluei
Copper

Mercury
Nickel
Cine
Cyenlde
Tin





























6000.00
220.00
400.00
1000.00
300.00
100.00
650.00
3100.00
3100.00
2300.00
2400.00
1700.00
3400.00
3400.00
1300.00
090.00
400.00
1000.00
9700.00
7.70
25C.OO
44.00
• 153.00
425.00
150.00
0.65
73.50
767.00
2.70
1 26. SO
Detected
Cone.
6000.00
220.00
400.00
1000.00
300.00
100.00
650.00
3100.00
3100.00
2300.00
2400.00
1700.00
3400.00
3400.00
1300.00
•90.00
400.00
1000.00
9700.00
7.70
256.00
44.00
153.00
425.00
150.00
0.65
73.50
767.00
2.70
26.50
AND MEDIUM/ARIA
Oeo«. 95 Pet. Mln. Max.
Mean 0pp. Conf. Detect. Detect.
Cone. LlMlt LlHlt Lleilt
6000.00
220.00
400.00 .
1000.00
300.00
100.00
650.00
3100.00
3100.00
2300.00
2400.00
1700.00 . .
3400.00
3400.00
1300.00
090.00
400.00
1000.00
9700.00
7.70
256.00
44.00
159.00
425.00
150.00
0.65
73.50 . .
767.00
2.70
26.50

-------
                                                       TABLE  12 contd.
                                               rot mcrr »m,  »T CHMICAL JUH> MIDION/AUA

                                        TYPB-flurf. ltat«r-M*y* Crk. tDvngrd)	
                                       HUM.
Aaalyt*
D«t«et«4

    1
                                                   Cone.
clB-l,3-Dlc)iloro«tli«n«
Chlorofom
1*1, l-Trlehloro«thwi«
Trlchloro«th«n«
••rim
Xlno
Cyaald*
                                                             D«t«ct«d
                                                               Cone.
Cone.
  9S Pet.
Opp. ConC.
   LlBlt
                        Mln.
                      D«t«ct.
  Hax.
D«t*ct.
 Limit
5.000
0.450
0.07S
4.SOO
10.SOO
130. SOO
149. SOO
it. 250
20.400
s.ooo
o.cso
0.075
4.500
10.500
130.500
149.500
10.250
20.400
S.OOO
O.C50
0.075
4.500
10.500
130.500
149.500
10.250
20.400

-------
                                                TABLE  12  contd.
                               •GMtAJtr •TATimca fO« PACIT •!«.  BT CHEMICAL AMD MKDItlM/AMA

                              	 TYPI-aurt. Meter-Area 10 	
                                MUM.
                                TlM*
                              D«C«cC«d
          MUM.
         •••pi**
ChloroMthene
Carbon DleulClde
1, 1-Dlcbloroethane
ele-l,a-Dlcbloroetbeae
Trlcbloroetbene
1 , a-Dlobloroben*eae
Benzole Acid
biaf a-ltbylbeKyUphtfaaUte
Aroclor-1340
Alualntw
BarlUM
Copper
Lead
tine
Cyanld*
t
I
 Lowest
Detected
  Cone.
                        0.
                        0.
                        • .
                        t.
                        a.
                        3.
                        4.
                        1.
Detected
  Cone.
  10.
   7«.
 lato.
   2*.
   11.
   *a.
  us.
   ta.7
Oera.
Mean
Cone.
<
<
1
1
1
<
t
1
4
S4I
241
T
2191
7(
a
C,
09
1
(.
1.
>.
I.
1.
1.
•
>.
1.
1.
I.
».
1.
1.
1.
K
1.
1.'
4
1
I
I
- 1
<
«'
1
\
3J(
n
7'
1441
4
1
3
54
r
1.90
i.aa
>.45
L.50
1.00
1.00
If £
.••
(.00
1.97
f.OC
1.19
».JO
1.00
1.31
i.oa
1.03
T.ac
1.97
  95 Pet.
Opp. ConC.
   LlMtt
  Nln.
Detect.
 Limit
                                                    1
                                                    1
                                                    e
                                                    1
                                                    e
                                                   50
  MM.
Detect.
 LlBlt
                                                   1
                                                   1
                                                   •
                                                   1

                                                  SO
                                       39

                                       10
                                                                                                                    39

-------
                                               TABLE 12 contd.
                           •OtWARY CTATimCI POM MCCT CITC.  »T CHBHICAt AMD NtOIOM/JUUA
ChloroMthu*
riuor«n«
Ph«nMithr«n«
Chry*«n«
B«oio( b) (luor«nth«n«
B«nso( k) f luor«ntli«n«
B«nso( •)pyr«n<»
CmOmlvm
ChroMl
Copp«r
L*«d
tine
S.
IS.
at.
aa.
48.
ai.
32.
CO.
CO.
10.
§33.
1CS.
11.
1C.
C7.
SI.
act.
s.
IS.
at.
aa.
48.
ai.
32.
CO.
CO.
10.
§33.
1CS.
11.
1C.
C7.
SI.
act.
s.
15.
at.
aa.
48.
ai.
32.
CO.
CO.
10.
§33.
1CS.
11.
1C.
C7.
SI.
act.
O«OB
H*«n
Cone.
S.
15.
at.
aa.
48.
ai.
32.
CO.
CO.
18.
§33.
1CS.
11.
1C.
C7.
SI.
act.
tS Pee.
Opp. Conf.
klalt
•
»
•
*
•
•
•
•
*
*
•
•
*
•
•
•
*
Mln.
D«t«ct .
Ll.lt
•
•
•
*
*
•
*
•
*
*
*
*
•
•
*
*
*
tux.
D«t«ct .
Limit
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
*
•
•
•
•
*
*
•
*
*

-------
                                             TABLE 12  contd.
                               SOHHARV STATISTICS FOR FACET SITS.  BY CHEMICAL AMD MEDIUM/AREA

                              	 TYPB-SurC. ««t«r-Dr«ln 8«ral* (Dvngrd)  	
  Nu*.

D«t«ct«d    Analysed
ChloroMtbMM
Ac«ton«
Carbon Dlaulfld*
bl*< 2-Behylh«Brl)phthftUt«
BndriD k«ton«
AlualntM
Ar««nle
••rim
Copper
line
Cyuiid*
Tla
D«t*ct*d
  Cone.

  24.00
   3.00
   0.10
   S.OO
   0.11
 133.00
   3.00
  • S.OO
   5.40
  11.CO
  27.00
   9.90
  30.20
  • 1.30
  20. SO
                                                                  D«t«ct«d
                                                                    Cone.
                                                                               Cone.
  95 Pet.
0pp. Conf.
   LlMlt
24.00
34.00
0.10
S.OO
0.12
7CC.OO
' 3.00
1100.00
5.40
11. CO
3C.70
15.70
171.00
• 1.30
20. SO
1.017
7.990
0.292
S.OOO
O.OC7
337.992
2.4CC
ICO. 064
3.232
• .709
1S.02C
S.377
92.440
10.107
10.902
  Hln.
O«t«ct.
 Limit

   1.0
    •
   1.0
  10.0
   0.1

   2.0

   5.0
   c.o
   0.0
   2.0

  10.0
  15.9
  H«X.
D«t«ct.
 tl«lt

   1.0

   1.0
  10.0
   0.1
    •
  10.0

   s.o
   c.o
   0.0
   2.0
    •
  10.0
  IS.9

-------
                                           TABLE  13
 TABLE    WOSLTS.PATHWAY: woesnoNorSHXMBTO IN AREAS <* 10BYTHESTASSSI& RESENTANDFUIUWSONAWOS
 VARIABLE
IAHOB
            ,: VALUE
IfiDTONT   ' ^XJSED ';   BXnONALB
 lm
  Youtfe(A|«»-ll)
                      417
                                                  tmwn
              (Ytft)
  Touch
    i .  w
        8    -:';:;:  10    Tool jmn it i|t r°°P
                                                 uo
                                       AHum* youth
                                                                        . tod bD CM
                                                                   Ml)
 You*
  too .   »
      w    i.:--? loo;
                                             RAOS.IN*
 'rtcrim hftiujfrtm
                                                                                              KAOS.19I9
                                                                           eenaalaiMd
 *-"tl*l Jm* ffttft)
 Yecft
 oanevcmefts
  MS  .  MB
IOMO  - wso
uas    |;;, x»;   1*^. *<&;*. * **t>»
       "'         i»4 *n bMtf oe «xpow«
                                                 RAQS.l«n
        ErpoAjn Fiaan Htndbook. ffA «OOt-»««S.
          .U A»aa«t Ouidinc* for S^»rfjid. Volunt IE7A J40rt-«9«01 Offi
f)EAH ini. S^wfunO Eipcun Aw«ata Mioual ffA 5*Oa4M»L OBa of R*m«S«! Kjtporm. April INt

-------
                                                   TABLE  13
 TABLE    ES«SUMfATHWAY:IHOESnON OF SHXMBTOD* MATS CREEK BY LOCAL REBDOfB,
    	                    mSBfTANDFUTUWSCB«AJUOS
 VARIABLE
RAWB
                                                                  MFEMSCZ
  AAJl
                                                         fc-   ^
                                                         ?-   r^
                                                               "
                                 10	fn
                                                                  miun
                                                                  MOS.1M9
 XnfiaDef Etpeui (Ywit)
  SMJIChDd
    1  .  1
    1  .  JO
                        a
                       U
                                                                                              KAO&1M*
                                1 • 27}
                               I • 27)
                     ULS   f •  M
                                                                   teim ^rini vid bD (M
                                                                        Hl)
 CkM
                                                            "100
                                                                  RACS.1N9
                                                                   RAOS
                                                                                              RA011M9
                                                                       ^ b eanafflinrad
     ciw|«m
 M5 . 1019
10950 . 2S550
 M5 .  10*90
10MO •  29550
                                                  HO   I/  JJO»3X
                                                 11290
                               29590
                                                                  IUO&1M*
                                                                  1UOS.1M9
                                                                      MI kiMd oe txpoun
EFH1N9. E>powriF«aanHuw*ac*.EPA/«QO.t.l9/0<). ttpaert *.iiaim»lCraap,Offie«cfHMlthiadEBviiBe»BalA»«ittta. 1N9

SEAH l*U. Supefjxi Eipoun Aumacet Maom; ETA 54QA4M01. 00e« of Xcau6*l lUpxK. Afril INI

-------
                                         TABLE 13
TABU   EXPOSURE PATHWAY: INCESHON OF OCTO SUBSWACE SOTLS BY imiJTY WORKERS, fREB*T AHD FUIVRE SCENARIOS
VARIABU tAHOB
MBPCCKr rUSEO '"" BAnOKALB
BEFERENCZ
tm*,~P^lM~. ?;?-.,: :':: UiHiijWarUf.
1*4 *•«*,  10 . Aauoi miiounMBi of
f;V:'':- ' " kl»Md OllitiM It *
^P::T BAGS
iJ4;;";; . 1 ':: A*uat tet ill BD
:.::-••.;.;:, -.•; mtirifi it eonUBiniMd
KTS 1 ':• UOO Rjrft, midpoint ft vih*
U2SO HvC 2SSSO emt tn b«Md en tipoun
|:;?;:l:.V;;:-; Antfea
RAC&19K


RAOS.19I9
RAGS.W9
KAO&1M9
DH m« EipeaiTt Ficon Hindkoek. E?A «O,t49«<3. Expaun AMUMDICroup. Offict rfHultk ind Enviicnacmal AMUEXM. 1919
RAGS. 19W. Kik AutHBcn GuiUne. fvSupirfund. Veluw I E?AS40n<9«01 Offiei of Eo«jenej and liau£i! KMJXMM.
SEAM 1*U. &f»rfjnd Etptmif* Auwatac MMMal ETA HO/14MOI. OOc* of lUotdiil t mprtm. April 1MI.

-------
                                              TABLE  13
TABU   EXPOSURE PATHWAY: DCEST10N OP OWTTE SUUACE SOUS IY TOESP ASEKS, PRESEW AND FUTURE SCEXAJUO5
 VARIABLE
KAHOB
             ;VALDB
MIDfOWT     vUSH>"
!•* *••«*/ f*>
                                     «C.7
                                   S9    SO* praedk «•>!)• to
                                  s...- ''•'•    nap; nlu* 0*4 • r*.
                                    ^:    rf«T
 You*
    1 •  10
                  10    Teal jr«n to i|t |m^
 Youfc
                                i • m
                      uts
                                                                     AamM you*
                                                                              (ill (J»
                                                                     Mil)
                               100 -  »
      ISO   ,    100
            *
                                                                    RA011M9
                                                                     toehfldraeaenkia*
                                                                           •kltlltBO
                                                                          td b CDnusinittd
  MS -  MSO
 IOMO -  XSM
     U25
     ISBO
 MSO    R«(t.Bidpoi«.*«»l<
3SSSO    MdirtbMdCB
                                                                                                 RAO&1N9
                                                      BI Group. OCBe* of H«hb uti Enviranataal
RAO& 1W«. Hsk AIMMSK Gui&m (or S^ttfiM Velm V ETA S40/149O02. OOei of BB«|IW} «rf lUndii! K
SEAM 1WI. Scpef^ Eipcaun ABORMOI Masuil ETA 54ai4M01. OOJa eTIUatdiil lUpeMi. Afrt 1«H.

-------
                                       TABLE  13
 TABLE    BPORKE PATHWAY: DGESHON OF SEZXMEXIS v THE NORTH ORAINAOE DTTCH BY TRESPASSER PRESORT
                              AND FUTURE SCENARIOS                              	
 VARIABLE
tANOB
             VALUE
MBFOOrr      USED     BAHOKALB
                                                                 J
  YaA(Ap9-lf)
  &? .  «L7
      417
                                                                    EFHIW*
 9ttr*ie* ffC^a
  You*
    1 . 30
                                  10    Teal
                                i . m
                      uu
                                                                               ted bO
 nj«sao lUu
 Y«A
  100 •   *0
      UD
100
                                                                    yvidd
RAO&1K9
            frwe
                                                         ,*     I
                                                                           it eonuaiaiMd
                                                                   RAOS.1M*
           (Dffl)
 eonorcino|*a
  MS  •  MM
 10ISO  •  2USO
                       Rjnp. Bidpoim. ft nth*
                                                  UBO   ?  V5SO
                                                                                                KAOS.19I9
%TK 1M9. Ei^ajnFtaanKwdboek. EPA AOO/149&O. Expocun «aara*iiOroup, OOe*of H*tttud Gnviranocnal AMHWIS. 1919
&ACS. 1919.  UtkAuc^aOudne* fa Sotted VeluaiL ETA $40/149M1 Offiaof Effl«f|«ney«id!Un»di»lR«por»t. DKtab«19l9.
SEAM1M*.  &ip«fuod E»?o«u» AaaraimM«nuiV EPA Wl-ttW. Ottct oflUandUl KapcaM. Aprtl I9C.

-------
                                     TABLE 13  .
TABLE   EXPOSURE PATHWAY: WOESTION OF SSXMBTO w KBOHIS WUOUOE SWALB BY IOCAI «smexis,
VARIABLE
RANDS teoKorr * USED »ATWNALB REFTO&CE
KmV<,'F**J~~, - - UctJRjKfeflU
lull Chnd (AT M)
Aduh
SoallCfeild
Adutt
Scdl Child
Adult •
•laoan Hmt Otf&iy)
Child
Adult
(Utiilta)
Boncarcioofc"
AAih
Mnevrioo|ffli
1 tl.4 Vilw^dB^laent EfKlM*
. * ' HJ iy aaBMabee RAOS. I*t9
1*9 3 (;' • J Tea] put to ift p«v
1 - JO IJ i 10 MftfKMdktotfM RAQS.19W
X
1 . 771 UU ? 1O ftr-imt T l^t mnfr-n
; " ' *»ia|wfflm«&ld«k
1 . XTl 1X4 >;- 11 Aauu 2 4*4 ncdoen
? . - - MM
i''" 100 V«I»cMdiitpclB*b RAOS.1N9
«v
RAOS
^ ' - i A»vn« tat all BD RAQS. 1919
if'o v *
•BB^Bfld • ODQUBIBItrf
MS . 10tS HO 1; 10BS R«|«.Bldpoia.AvmliB RAOS. 1919
10HO . aSMO 1S2SO 1" J5SSO gBd«nbMdae«poM«
MS • 10190 JU fTlOWO Rjn|t,nidpBia.*mvB RAOS. 1W»
10930 - 2S550 1C50 f »»^ wd m l«^ ce «|MM
EFH m». Eipewn F*aon Htadbook. B A *00,l-l?flO. ExpoMn A*aM«ii Oreup, OCCci rfHulih tad bm
SEAM. 19U Supt^und EipoKft AHCUWOI MKMX ETA S40/14MOI. Offie* of fcMditl lUtpoeM. Apfl 1MI,

-------
                                       TABLE 13
TABU!   EXKSUie PATHWAY: DOMIATION OP OOKTAMINAWS VOLATTLIZE) PHQM (WOUND WATER WHEN
                            RSDQTO SWWEK. PWSEXT AND nnvw SCENARIOS
VALUE
VARIABLE RANGE Mrrynvf ^ jif»p RATIONALE REFEXS4Q
*«w r*r»iM~* leaJRMifa

ModtW value (5t* AppMdii Q !p -
* — ;
MMB • • ^Q ^J) flQ^ABtBQO
Adui A.XU , flj 41S f, oj Ma p^mlk Mlw tar
|j , ^^
^ - «t i anfU tmadcnoi
fv»t F'tf^uy (DfytVtf) 1 • MS 1CJ SC5 AHUM diily Aowin
AAJtt . \ M V«J» uMd k M bourfy

RAOS.1M9
RAB&1N9
RAOV1W9
SEAM 19*1
MO&1M*
V
ocoureinona. MS. 25SSO IITPS f IOMO R«|«, ai^oia. * vtha RAOS. 1IW
(wciaepoi 10MO • 255JO 12TTS JSSSO iMdtnbiMdeDaacan
^
Anbeo
EFH.J9I9. Etpoun Ftaon Hin^aok. VAMOf49AO.
HAG& 1919. Rjik AOUBMI Cuidtau (or i$»rfur< Veluat
SEAH tni Supafind Eipoun ABMacoi KUoial ETA WM-ttOOl.
up. 0^-r rf Hritft tn* Bn'nrompnl
                                                                                      1M9
                                                     Offm of EoMrgtacy vd Ktat&il Import*. Dvio^r 1M9.
                                                  rf lUaxdUl Rapamt. A^il IfU.

-------
                                              TABLE  13
 TABLE   BPC5URE PATHWAY: DCBDON OP OKOUND WAT» IT LOCAL KB OEHI* PRESS*! AKD PVIUHE SCENARIOS
 VARIABLE
                              ftANOB
MDPOKT     * USED"   KATMNALB
 »•+*•<*/ 
-------
                           TABJ.f.
TABLE    POTENTIAL NONCARCINOGENIC EFFECTS OF FACET COCs: TOXICITY VALUES
Uncertainty and
Contaminant Chronic RID (oral) Confidence Critical Modifying Factor*
or Concern (rog/kQ/day) Laval (a) EffecVSpaclw (b)
Volatile*
Acetone 1 X Iff'
Benzene -
2-Bulanone 6 x 10*
Carton dfeuTide 1x19*
Chloroform 1 x 10*
tttorornatham -
1.1-Ofchto»oetnan« 1 x Iff'
U-Oichtoroefhane 7.4 X 104 (d)
cb-U- 1 x 10*
ff*tM»A^MB%AfftiajlAMam

low incraasad Nvar waighl UF • 1.000
and nephrotoxicity/rat MF • 1

MF.1
madkm fetal toxidly/hialfonnationa in UF-100
rabbits MF-1
HIOUUII lany cyst NMiiiwion n ur « ituuu
Kvei/dbg MF - 1
- - - '
— — —

_ — —
RfD
Sourc*

IRIS (2«1)
(US. EPA atudy)
IRIS (3W91) (UBela
•rwl nti^nAr 11K';t
ana Dnvyoi, i;f93|
IRIS (5WV91) (Hanfh et.
a)., 1981)
IRIS (2/91)
(Haywood at. al., 1979)
Haast. 1990
HEAST. 1990
U.S. EPA
Drinking Water
Regulations and
Health Advisories.
1990
HEAST. 1990

-------
         TABLE 14
TABLE    (CONTINUED)

Contanrinanl Chronic HID (oral)
of Concern (mg/kg/day)
•ans-1.2- 2 x 1 0*
Dichloroelhylene
1,1-Otehtoroetfiytene 9 x 10*
EViybenzene 1 x 10*'
AA.aaVi d.ta . **«-• — »_a— m M -ttfvff
MVUIJflVIIV vtaWfUJP O Jl IV
TelracNoioetfiytene 1 x Iff*
Toluene 2x1ff'(c.e)
1,1.1-Trichlororthane 9 x 1O*
TnttMoroethytene 7x10*
»-* • • - ^ •§..--.• 4 H -i Ar^
incrworonuuiDiiieinane j x iu
Confidence Critical
Uvel (a) EffectfSpeclM
bw increased serum alhafne
mmfium hepatic lesions In rats
loxicnyrat
_ iwgwbwMh^hrt
CMS effects**
in guinea pigs
medium hblopalholugy in rats/mice
Uncertainty and
Modifying Factor*
(b)
UF. 1.000
MF.1
UF.1000
MF.1
UF. 1,000
MF.1
UF.100
MF.1
UF.1000
MF.1
UF.100
MF-NA
UF . 1,000
MF.1
*•
UF. 1.000
MF-100
RID
Source
IRIS (2/91)
(Barnes el. al.. 1985)
IRIS (2/91)
(Quasi el. al.. 1983)
IRIS (2/91)
(Wo», el al.. 1958)
IRIS (2/91)
IRIS (2/91) (Buben and
O-Flahmty, 1985)
HEAST, 1990
IRIS (2^1) (Adams el.
al., 1950 Torkelson
el. al.. 1958)
US. EPA Drinking
Water Regufstions
and Health Advisories.
1990
IRIS (2/91) (NCI. 1978)

-------
                                                            TABLE 14
                                                 TABLE     (CONTINUED)
Contaminant
of Concern
Chronic RID (oral)
{mg/kg/day)
Confidence
Level (a)
Critical
Effect/Specie*

Uncertainty *nd
Modifying Factors
(b)

RID
Source
 Vinyl Chloride
 Xytenes (total)
Arthracene
BenzofcAcid
 1.4 x 10* (d)
 2X10*
                     fix Iff*


 AcenapNhytene       6x10*
3x10'
4x10*
Benzo(a)anthracene   —

Benzo(a)pyrene       —

Benzo(b)fluoranthene  —

Benzo(g,h.i)P*ryk**   4 x 10* (g)
imdhm      hyperactkHy. In-
             creased mortatty/rals
                                                     no effada In mica
                                                     inilation. malaise/
                                                     human
                                                                                  UF-100
                                                              UP. 3.000
                                                              MF.NA
                                         UF. 3.000
                                         MF-1

                                         UF-1
                                         MF-1
 US. EPA
 Drinking Water
 Regulations and
 Health Advisoriea,
 1990

 IRI3(Z/91)
IRIS (3/91) (U.S. EPA.
1989)

U.S. EPA Drinking
Water Regulations
and Health Advisories,
1990 (DWRHA. 1990)

IRIS (3/91) (U.S. EPA.
1989)

IRIS (2/91)
(U.S. EPA. 1987)

IRIS (3/91)

IRIS (2/91)

IRIS (3/91)

IRIS

-------
r>
-.1
                                                               TABLE 14
                                                 TABLE     (CONTINUED)
 Contaminant
 of Concern
Chronic RfO (oral)    Confidence   Critical
(mg/kgYday)         Level (a)     Effect/Species
Uncertainty and
Modifying Factors     RfO
(b)                   Source
 Benzofkjfkjoranlhene  —

 Bb(2-ethyflMxyO       2ji Iff*
 phlhafe'a

 Cnryaana             •«•

 Dfcenzo(«.h)          ~


 Dfcanzofuran (T)       -

 r***uty!phthafate    1»Iff'
                     2K10*
                     4x1ff*
  -itwUale

                   4X10*


deno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene —

; Methyl naphthalene —

laphthalene         4 x 1ff»
                                         tow
                                 Increased fcver weighV
                                 guinea pig
    UF. 1,000
    MF-1
                                              ally in rats
                                 elevated Mill ray and
                                 fiver weighlafral
    UF. 1.000
    MF.1

    UF-fOOO
    MF-NA
                                 nephropathdogy. ftver          UF • 3.000
                                 weight changes, hematological   MF-1
                                 changes/mice

                                 hematological changes/mice     UF « 3000
                                                              MF.1
                                                                                                  IRIS (3/91)

                                                                                                  IRIS (10790);
                                                                                                  (Carpenter, el al.. 1953)

                                                                                                  IRIS (3/21/91)
                                                      ocular and internal lesionsfol    —
                                                                                                  IRIS (3/91) (Smth.
                                                                                                  1953)

                                                                                                  HEAST. 1990
                                                                                                  (Piehacz. 1971;
                                                                                                  EPA, 1987)

                                                                                                  IRIS (3/91)
                                                                                                  (U.S. EPA. I960)
                     IRIS (3/91)
                     (U.S. EPA, 1989)

                     IRIS (3/91)
                                                                               HEAST. 1990
                                                                                                                                QUAL/TY

-------
                                                        TABLE  14
                                               TABLE    (CONTINUED)
Contaminant
of Concern
                   Chronic RIO (oral)
                   (mg/ko/day)
                                       Confidence)   Critical
                                       Uval (•)
                        Uncertainty and
                        Modifying Factors     RID
                        (b)                  Source
I ertacMoraprwnol    3x10*
Pestickles/PCB*

Aiodor-1248

Arodor-1254
Aluminum
An0nio
Barium
                   1.2 x 104 (d)
                    1 x 10* (c)


                    7x10*
                                       low
                                       medkm
                                                         •fradwiiiwo
reduced Mespan.
altered blood
chemistries/rat

kwafosts and hyper*
pigmentation/human

increased blood pressure
in humans
                                                                               UF- 1.000
                                                                               MF«1
                                                                                UF- 3.000
                                                                                MF«1
                                                                                UF. 1,000
                                                                                MF»1
UF.i
MF.NA

UF.3
MF«1
                                                                                                IRIS (2/91)
                                                                                                (Schwetx et. al.,
                                                                                                1978)

                                                                                                IRIS (3791)

                                                                                                IRIS (3/91)
                                                                                                (U.S. EPA. 1989)
                                                                                                IRIS (2A1)
                                                                                                IRIS (2/91)
                                                                                                (Shroeder, el at., 1970)
                                                                                                HEAST. 1990
IRIS (2/91) (Wooes el.
al.. 1990; Brenniman and
Levy. 1984)

-------
            TABLE  14
TABLE     (CONTINUED)
Uncertainty and
Contaminant Chronic RID (oral) Confidant* Critical Modifying Factor*
ofConcam (mg/kg*tey) Laval (a) EffacVSpaclaa (b)
Ben/Hum 5x10*
Cadmium 6x10*
Chromium VI 6*10*
Copper
Cyanide 2x10*
Load NothraahoM
Meicun/ 3xUT*
Nickel 2x10*
Star 3 x 10*
low no observed advene
effect/rat
high aigniNcanl protoinuria/
human
low not dafinadYat

nWQMnl WMgnl 1089, •lyiUM viiowiA,
m/efina degeneration in rats
- -
- neuratoxidry. kidney
effects/rat

HNHJkflii aigyrla/huiiHMu
UF-100
MF-1
UF-10
MF-1
UF-500
MF-100
UF-100
MF-S
-
UF- 1.000
UF-100
MF«3
UF-2
MF-1
RID
Souroa
IRIS (2^1)
(Shroedarand
MHchner, 1975)
IRIS (2/91)
(U.S. EPA, 1964)
IRIS (2/91)
(MacKenria, at. a!.,
1958)
IRIS (2/91)
IRIS (2/91)
\nowmra ana mnzai.
19SS;PhHbricketal.,
1979)
IRIS (2/91)
HEAST. 1990;
(Fewer, at. at., 1987)
IRIS (2^1)
IRIS (2/91);
(Gad and Staud. 1935:
                                              East. at. al. I960)

-------
                                                  TABLE 14
                                                            (CONTINUED)
Contaminant
of Concern
tti
Zinc
	 « 	 ««-«-»-
•• nOt •VBBBDIV
Chronic RfO (oral)
(moAg/day)
6x10*'

Confidence Criticn
Level (a) Effsct/bpeelea
~ • anemia/humane

Uncertainty and
Modifying Factor*
(b)
UF-tO
MF.N7A

RfD
Source)
HEAST. 1990
HEAST. 1990
(Pones, et. al.,
Prasad. et. al..


1967;
1975)

rtftl I tin»»«t«iMiAi fT^riil ~ ^ *^* ~»^ * i i f^ T • f* .i> • • AJffl K*. ^-JS-- • *^. ».— -* *• 	 * JAM •A.Atf.a_.t .•..
     UFi (104bkf factor for each):

     •  variation in human aanrt
    •  animal to human axtrapolnlion
    •  extrapolation from aubchronic to chronic NOAEL
                   rom LOAELlo NOAEL
MF§ (greater tfian zero and I»M than or equal to 10)

    •  fYofasafcnal judgment baaed on adantific ittoartaMiaa of afi«iy and datab
> other than those listed above; defauR value is 1.
(c)  Under review by the EPA RfD Work Group; therefore, no IRIS entry.
(d)  No RfO available. Chronic protective dose derived from Long-Term Health Advisory (HA) for aduMs as follows:

       Protective dose (moAoMay) • (Long-term HA jio/L) (21 exposureAiav^   (mo/1000 ug)
(e)  New revised RfD pending.
(0  Available data inadequate for quantitative risk assessment (HEAST. 1990).
(g)  The RfD for naphthalene b used as a surrogate for PAHs showing evidence of nonoardnoganfe effects.
Note:  Sources are IRIS (EPA. 199f b) and HEAST (EPA. 1990a).

-------
                                   TABLE 15
  TABLE     SUMMARY OF NONCARCINOGENIC HAZARD INDICES (HI) FOR THE
                                  FACET SITE*
                                              Current/    Acute       Chronic
Scenario                            Receptor  Future .    HI          HI


Ground Water

Ingestion                            Resident     C/F   10 x 10°(b)*  2.0 x 10'(b)*
                                                       4.6 x 10°(c)»  4.6 x 10'(c)»
Volatfles Inhalation While Showering     R<"            "   N/A          14 x 10'5

Sou                                         °)

Surface Soil - Ingestion                                    ^ x 104     1.6 x 10"1
Subsurface SoU - Ingestion                                3.9 x 10*     6.8 x 10*
Surface Soil, Plant 2 Yard - Ingestion                 jf   6.6 x 10*     12 x 10*1
Subsurface Soil, Plant 2 Yard • Ingestio.              C/F   1.7 x 10*7     6.2 x 1CT7
Oil/Water Separator - Ingestion                      C/F   3.5 x 10*     4.1 x 10*1

Sediment
Height's Drainage Swale • Ingestion

North Drainage Ditch - Ingestion
May's Creek - Ingestion

Area 6 • Ingestion
Area 10 - Ingestion
Resident

Trespasser
Resident

Trespasser
Trespasser
OF

OF
OF

OF
OF
1.3 x ICT'O))
1.0 x 10°(c)*
5.1 x 10-1
1.1 x 10*(b)
8.5 x 10*(c)
3.9 x 10*
5.8 x Iff1
WxKT'Cb)
3.5 x 10°(c)*
3.9 x la1
19 x 10*(b)
4.3 x 10-'(c)
6.8 xlO4
6.0 x lO"1
•Dermal pathways not evaluated quantitatively based on current EPA Region n guidance for the
Facet site (EPA, 1992).
(b) • adult
(c)-child                                                                       ^
* ffl exceeds one (1).                                               POOR QVJA*.Vn
                                                                    ORIGINAL

-------
                                   TABLE  15
 TABLE     SUMMARY OF NONCARCINOGENIC HAZARD INDICES (HI) FOR THE
                                  FACET SITE*
Scenario
          Current/    Acute
Receptor  Future  .    HI
Chronic
HI
Ground Water

Ingestion                           .  Resident

Volatile* Inhalation While Showering     Resident

Soil

Surface Soil • Ingestion                Trespasser
Subsurface Soil • Ingestion             Worker
Surface Soil, Plant 2 Yard • Ingestion     Trespasser
Subsurface Soil, Plant 2 Yard • Ingestion  Worker
Oil/Water Separator • Ingestion          Worker

Sediment
             C/F   2,0 x 10°(b)*   2.0 x 10'(b)*
                   4.6 x 10°(c)»   4.6 x 10'(c)»
             C/F   N/A          2.4 x 10*
OF
C/F
C/F
OF
OF
73x10-*
3.9 x 10*
6.6 x 10*
1.7 x 10*
3.5 x 10-'
1.6 x 10*
6.8 x 10*
2.2 x 10*
6.2 x ID"'
4.1 x 10*
Height's Drainage Swale - Ingestion

North Drainage Ditch - Ingestion
May's Creek - Ingestion

Area 6 • Ingestion
Area 10 - Ingestion
Resident

Trespasser
Resident

Trespasser
Trespasser
C/F

OF
C/F

OF
OF
1.3 x 10*(b)
1.0 x 10°(c)»
5.1 x 10*
1.1 x 10*(b)
8.5 x 10*(c)
3.9 xlO*
5.8x10*
2.4 x lO-'OO
3.5 x 10e(c)*
3.9 x 10*'
2.9 x 10*(b)
4.3 x 10*(c)
6.8 x 10*
6.0 x 10*1
•Dermal pathways not evaluated quantitatively based on current EPA Region H guidance for the
Facet site (EPA, 1992).
(b) • adult
(c) - child
* HI exceeds one (1).

-------
                             TABLE 16




TABLE  .. POTENTIAL CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS OF FACET COCS: SLOPE FACTORS
Chemical
Voiatltoa
Acetone
Oenzene
2-Butanone
Carbon Dlsuflide

Chbromethana
1,1-Dfcrtoroemane
1,2-Jtehkxoethan*
Stope Factor
(mo/kg/day)'

-
2.9x10* (oral)
2.9 x 10* (InhaQ
-
6.1 x 10* (oral)
8.1* 10* (Wai)
1.3 x 10* (oral)
6.3 x 10* (Intel)
-
9.1 x 10* (oral)
EPA
Weight of Evidence
Classification

0
A
O
D
B2
C
C
B2
Type of Cancer/Species

lack of data In humans
and animals
leukemia/human
lack of data In humans
and animals
lack of data In humans
and animals
kidney tumors/rat
hepatoceHular cardnoma/
female mouse
mouse kidney
mouse kidney
hemangio-sarcoma In rat
tar/rat and mouse

Slope Factor Source

IRIS (2/91)
IRIS (2*1)
(Rinsky. et el.. 1961;
On. et al.. 1978;
Wang, et al., 1963)
IRIS (3/91)
IRIS (201)
IRIS (201)
(Jorgensen. et al..
1985; NCI. 1976)
HEAST. 1990 (CHT.
1981 ;NIOSH. 1984;
US EPA. 1986.87)
IRIS (201)
(NCI, 1978)
IRIS (201)

-------
TABLE-16 (CONTINUED)
Slope Factor
Chemical (mg/fcg/day)1
Cte-1.2-D(Chloroe1hy1ene
trans-1.2-Dichkxoethytene
Ifl a"ht a • •• I i 1 1 • A A w 4 ft* tf <*M fall
,1-Otehtoroelhylene 6.0 x iw lorai)
1.2(MiaJ)
EthytMiuena ••
Mettytone Chtoifcto 7.5 nKT1 (oral)
TftracNoroettiytom S.1 • 10* (oral)
Toluene

,1,1-Tnciaoroeinan* —
TrtcKoroelhylene 1.1 « W* (o«0
EPA
Weight of Evident*
Classification
-
D
C

0
B2
B2
0
0
B2
Type of Cancer/Spectoa
-
lack ol data ki humans
and animate
auivnai |HK>\M«iiiwiiiui«yiuiiid8
In male raVF344
kidney adenocardnoma In
mate ownss mouse
lack of animal btoassay
and human studies
^M^Mtmt* m^mmMt mln m
•vef/VBi ano nwce
1.4 x 104 (Inhal)
Ivef/mouse
no human data; Inadequate
animal data
ro human data; Inadequate
animal data
lunQ and Iver tumoisAiwuse
Stop* Factor Source
-
IRIS (Z/91)
IRIS (2«1)
(NTO, 1982)
IRIS (2/91)
(Mattorl. et at.
1977, 1985)
IRIS(2/9t)
IRIS (2^1)
HEAST.1990
(NCI. 1978)
IRIS (391)
IRIS (2/91)
HEAST, 1990
jkjoA^ni «« «i lanei

-------
                                               TABLE  16  (CONTINUED)
i^i,-—,1,,—i
vnanucai
                            Slop* Factor
                            (mg/ko/dayy1
                                                     EPA
                                                     Weight of Evidence
                                                     Classification       Type of CanceriSpeclea     Slope Factor Source
TrichtorolhMKOinethana



Vinyl Chloride


Xytene* (total)


     Neutral/Add
                             1J(oral)(b)
Aoanaphthytena


Anthracene


Oanzoto Acid


Benzo(a)anthracana
                             1.15 x 10' (c)
                                                     D


                                                     D


                                                     D


                                                     B2
                                                                        tack of data hi humana
                                                                        and aiwiiab
                                                                        animal and human dna
                                                                        (nadequata
                                                                         no human A
                                                                         animal data
no
animal data

no human data; Inadequate
animal data

human cardnogenicHy
in mixture (d)
                                                                                                   IRIS (2^1)
                                                                                                   HEAST.1990
                                                                                                   (Maltonl, rt al., 1980)
                                                                                                  IRIS (3*1)

                                                                                                  IRIS
                                                                                                   IRIS (991)


                                                                                                   IRIS (2»1)
IRIS (3/91)
(US EPA. 1984.1990;
(ARC. 1984)

-------
                                              TABLE  16  (CONTINUED)
Stopo Factor
Chamlcal (mg/kg/day)-*
3amo(a)pyrana 1.15 « 10*
Oaiuo(b)FluofoajtftwBiia 1.15 K 10 (c)
f?snxo(g,h.l)pafytene —
DafuontjnoufBitnsiM i.is * TO icf
^ft^*fi% ^^A^h^a^^^uK^k 4 ^ •• 4)Av aV^a*SBS%
osiz-aiiiyiiiajiyi) i.^ • iu iv*ai|
phthalala
Chrysena 1.15 • 10f(c)
Dnanz(a,h)aninracan8 1.19 • iu w
(Mbanzofufan ••
EPA
Weight of Etndeoca
Ctasslflcatlon
B2
B2
D
B2
B2
B2(b)
D
^.«C««Sp^

tract/mousa stomach .
human cafdnoganlcKy
(nmtxtura (d)
no human data; Inadequate
animal data.
In mixture (d)
and adenoma/mouse
Ivar lumom In mala mica
N/A
lack of data In humans

SWIM Factor sowcf)
AWOC(1966)
(Thyssan. et al.. 1990
US EPA. 1980: Meal
and Rlgdan. 1987)
IRIS (3/91)
(US EPA. 1984, 1990;
(ARC. 1984)
IRIS (3/91)
IRIS (3/91)
(US EPA. 1984, 1990;
(ARC, 1984)
IRIS (2/91)
(NTP.1982)
IRIS (3/91)
(Wbtockl. al. al. 1988;
Buartng at. at., 1986)
HEAST, 1990
IRIS (2/91)
                                                                      and animals
DMHMlylphthalala
lack of data In humans
and animals
IRIS (3/91)

-------
TABLE  16  (CONTINUED)
Slope Factor
Chemical (mg/kg/day)'
DMMxaylphthalale

rHMJIMIIimiV
Fkiorsne . -
Meno<1.23-cd)pyr«ne 1.15 x 10'(c)
A X^aa^ J — •-ii^* — • 	
Z M6uiyi raprafltWM ••
>l»«itiiii-* 	 __
N^TCIHWnV •*
Pertad*XDphenol l^nlff'

EPA
Weight of Evidence
ClasslHcatlon
••
O
0
B2
-
0
B2(b)
O
n
Type of Cancer/Species
~
no human data; Inadequate
animal data
no human data; Inadequate
animal data
epMenrori careaiomas
In rat's lungs
-
no human data; toadequato
animal data
Hver, adrenal! cfecuhrioiy
systems
m human ifala* hiMtemato
animal data
•M lamiiMi d«l*> lna
-------
TABLE 16 (CONTINUED)
Cnamk*
ilarf||||li«»«lf»|l»
t^aaiicioaSfrvoa
Aioctor-1248
kiofQanlca
Akimkwm
AlKNIWiy
Aiaante
Barium
Barytlum
Cadmium
Chromium VI
Co par
Stopa Factor
(mg/kg/tfay)'
7.7 (oral)
7.7 (oral)
1.75 (oral)
••
4 J (oral)
6.1 (WwO
4.1 x 10* (Inhaf)
EPA
Weight of Evktenca
Classification
B2
62
A
B2
B1
A
D
Typa of Cancar/Spaclaa

rats and mtoa
rats and mtoa
cMnlhumans
gross tumors al sUss/lals
VI iy VaiKsOIMWIIKIIIB
lung tumors/rats
king cancsf /humans
Stopa Factor Sourca
IRIS (2/91)
1965)
IRIS (201)
1965)
IRIS (201)
IRIS (2/91)
IRIS (2*1)
IRIS (2/91)
IRIS (2/91)
(Thun. at al., 1985)
IRIS (2/91)
(Mancuso. 1975)
IRK f?A11

-------
                                                   TABLE 16  (CONTINUED)
 Chemical

 Cyanide

 Leadfa)

 Mercury
    %
 Nickel

 SeVer

 Tin

Zinc
Slope Factor
                                                        EPA
                                                        Wef oM of Evidence
                                                        Classification
                                                                           lack of data on humans
                                                                           andanhnab
                                                       B2

                                                       D


                                                       O

                                                       0
                                            animal data
                                                                          •"•mat and human data
                                                                          Inadequate
                                                                      WIS (2/91)
 IRIS (2*1)

 IRIS (2/91)


 IRIS (2/91)

 IRIS (2/91)



IRIS (3/91)
 (a) EPA Cancer Assessment Group recommends numerical estimate not be used for toad.
 (b) IRIS input pending.

 (c) Per EPA guidance, the benzo(a)pyrene stops factor b used as a surrogate tor other PAHs where sufficient evidence of cardnomnfcttv
    exists, as designated in IRIS or HEAST.                                                                      w»»"wiy
(e) Soot containing these chemicals was found to be carcinogenic (IRIS, 1991).
*%•_       	  —
Sources:  IRIS - See EPA. 1991 b
         HEAST. See EPA. 1990a.

-------
                                         TABLE 17
          TABLE   . SUMMARY OF CARCINOGENIC RISK ESTIMATES
                              FOR THE FACET SITE1
                                                          Current/   Incremental
                                            Receptor      Future     Risk
Scenario
Ground Water

                                            Resident       OF        2.0x10-**
Ingestion                     .               Resident       C/F        8.0 x 10 *
Volatiles Inhalation While Showering            Kesioem

Soil

                                            T                            x 10"**
Surface Soil - Ingestion                           *     /".//U-           * 10~'
Subsurface Soil - Ingestion                     r°r    /f^               x 10'10
Surface Soil, Plant 2 Yard - Ingestion            Tres     J t                  x 1(JrI1
Subsurface Soil, Plant 2 Yard - Ingestion         Wor                          x 1Q^»
Oil/Water Separator - Ingestion

Sediment

                                            p «A.nt       C/F        4.0 x 10"**
Height's Drainage Swale - Ingestion             R^en^      ^        g g R ^
North Drainage Ditch - Ingestion                R^denV      CVF        6.5x10"**
May's Creek - Ingestion                        «££*     ^        1.7 x 10j
Area 6 - Ingestion                             Trespasser     OF        5.1 x 10 *
Area 10 - Ingestion
*   Exceeds 10"* risk.
**  Exceeds 104 risk.
•Dermal pathways not evaluated quantatively based on current EPA Region n guidance for
the Facet site (EPA, 1992).

-------
                                      TABLE 17
          TABLE   . SUMMARY OF CARCINOGENIC RISK ESTIMATES
                            FOR THE FACET SITE1
Scenario
Receptor
Current/    Incremental
Future     Risk
Ground Water
Ingestion
Volatilcs Inhalation While Showering
Soil
Surface Soil - Ingestion
Subsurface Soil - Ingestion
Surface Soil, Plant 2 Yard - Ingestion
Subsurface Soil, Plant 2 Yard - Ingestion
Oil/Water Separator - Ingestion
Sediment
Height's Drainage Swale - Ingestion
North Drainage Ditch • Ingestion
May's Creek - Ingestion
Area 6 - Ingestion
Area 10 • Ingestion

Resident
Resident

Trespasser
Worker
Trespasser
Worker
Worker

Resident
Trespasser
Resident
Trespasser
Trespasser

C/F
C/F

C7F
C/F
C/F
C/F
C/F

C/F
C/F
C/F
C/F
C/F

2.0 x 10'3**
8.0 x 10'5*

1.1 x 10"**
4.2 x 10'7
2.5 x 10'10
2.4 x 10'"
1.5 x 10"**

4.0 x 10"**
8.8 x 10"*
6.5 x 10"**
1.7 x 10"*
5.1 x 10"*
*  Exceeds 10" risk.
** Exceeds 10" risk.
"Dermal pathways not evaluated quantatively based on current EPA Region n guidance for
the Facet site (EPA, 1992).

-------
                                             TABLE 18
                              PUROLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY

CHEMICAL


s-BuryfbcazcBe
C&JOTofonB
U'DienJoraethaae
U-DichJoroethaac
l,l-Dic&JoraetBeae
cavlJ-Dicalofoetbcac
B»n»-l,3-D*nloroet*eBe
DieUoredtfluoroaethtae
EtbytbcazeM
ItopropylbeBzeDe
4-boprDpyttoluenc
Metbylene Chloride
Nipbihtlcac
a-Propylbeazeae
1,1,1-TrichJoroeihanc
Thrbloroethcnc
TrichJorofluoromethiac
U>Thmeinytbtazene
U>Tnmethyftxttient
Vinyl Chloride
Xyknet

AJumiBum
Antimony
Ane nic
Bihum
Beryllium
Cadmium
Omnium
Copper
Uad
Mercury
Nickel
Silver
Tin •
Zwc
Cyanide

MAXCONC
<««/l)

U
1
2
A3
2
160
2
2
12
1
12
«9
23
22
13
190
19
11
tl
33
14

95300
4SJ
20.4
911
O
55J
1540
1200
146
54
•02
102
16.1
1110
994
GROUND
WATER
ARAR(l)
.v: :••::: .•:::-•..; ORGAKJCS ,. .. •
Standard
Standard
Standard
Suadutf
Suadutf
Sundud
SuDdwd
Sundu4
Studu4
SuiJutf
Sttftdifd
Sundiitf
Sandud
Sundiid
Sundird
Sundaid
Sundtrd
Sundird
Sundifd
Sundiri
Sundird
1NORGA>OCS
NA(3)
3 Cyidum Value (4)
25 Sundud
1000 Sundird
3 Cuidinec Value (4)
10 Sundird
50 Sundird
200 Sundird
25 Sundird
2 Sundird
100 Tcauiivc Pfopaed MCL (4)
JO Sundird
ZlpOO Chronic RID (4)
~JOa Sundird
100 Sundird

SOURCE (2)


NYSDEC (9/90)
KYSDEC (5/91)
NV$DEC(9/90)
NYSDEC (9/90)
NYSDEC (9/90)
KYSDEC (9/90)
KYSDEC (9/90)
KYSDEC (9/90)
KYSDEC (9/90)
KYSDEC (9/90)
KYSDEC (9/90)
KYSDEC (9/90)
KYSDEC (9/90)
KYSDEC (9/90)
KYSDEC (9/90)
KYSDEC (9/90)
KYSDEC (9/90)
KYSDEC (9/90)
KYSDEC (9/90)
KYSDEC (5/91)
KYSDEC (9/90)

_ •
KYSDEC (9/90)
KYSDEC (5/91)
KYSDEC (5/91)
KYSDEC (9/90)
KYSDEC (5/91)
KYSDEC (5/91)
KYSDEC (5/91)
KYSDEC (5/91)
KYSDEC (5/91)
USEPA (5/90)
KYSDEC (5/91)
USEPA-HEAST (1991)
KYSDEC (5/91)
KYSDEC(5/91)
MAX CONG
IS GREATER
THANAJUR

YES
NO
NO
NO
NO
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES

_
YES
NO
NO
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
NO
NO
YES
NO
NOTE&

0)


(2)
Wbce BO ARAR bat bc«B etublithed, aa appropriate
fuidinei or other bealib^aied vtluc • lifted, at
•oted.
a.       KYSDEC  1991.   Reviiion of  Water
        Quality RcfuUtiOBS for Surface Water aid
        Crouad Watcn. May.
k.       KYSDEC  1990.   Drvuioc of Water •
        TacBBJea!   and  Opentional  Cuidanet
        Strict  (1.1.1) • Afflbitm Water Quality
        Siaadirdi   aad  OuJdinet  Valuct.
        September.
c       USEPA.   1991b.     Healtk   Effent
        Aaestmcat Summary Tablet (HEAST).
        January.
        «.      USEPA, 1990a.  Fact Sheet - Drinkin|
                Water  Re|ulationt  vndcr the  Safe
                Drinkini Water AA. May.
(3)      No ARAR or fccalin-oaKd toaciiy vilue tvtiUbJe.
        RA did  Ml identify aluminum at a chemical  of
        concern.    Therefore,  ao  remcdiatic*  goal  at
        developed.
(4)      No ARAR available at denned in USEPA. 19t9a.
        Therefore, aa acceptable concentration wat derived
        •tin| tkc USEPA oral chronic reference dote (RfD)
        and the nandird expoture astumptioru of 2 liten/day
        infection rate and 70 k| average body wtijht.

-------
 Citation

 NYS; 6 NYCRR 736


 NYS; 6 NYCRR 757


 NYS; TOGS 1


 NYS; TOGS 2


 NYS; 10 NYCRR 5


 NYS; 10 NYCRR 170
                                  FEASIBILITY STUDY
                         PUROLATOR PRODUCTS COMPANY
Pescriotiop           .                   TVDC

Stile pollutant discharge elimination system     action


State pollutant discharge elimination system     action
Technical  and  operational guidance  for   action
pollutant discharge elimination system

Technical and operational guidance for ground   action
water
State public drinking water standards
chemical
State public drinking water source standards     chemical
                             GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS
Reason for Listing

May  relate  to on-site
treatment of wastes.

May  relate  to on-iite
treatment of wastes.

May  relate  to on-site
treatment of wastes.

May relate to remediation
of ground water.

May relate to remediation
of ground water.

May relate to remediation
of ground water.
ARARi   •   Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements

CAA      •   dean Air Act

OVA     .   Clean Water Act

OSHA    •   Occupational Safety and Health Act

RCRA    •   Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

SDWA    •   Safe Drinking Water Act

TBCs     •   To Be Considered

TSCA     •   Toxic Substances Control Act

-------
                                          TAULt
                              POTENTIAL ARARS AND TBCS
                                   FEASIBILITY STUDY
                          PUROL4TOR PRODUCTS COMPANY
 pUtJOD

 OSHA, 29 CFR 1910



 CAA;40CFR50


 CAA;40CFRS2


 CAA;40CFR60


 CAA; 40 CFR 61


 CWA, 40 CFR 122


 CWA;40CFR136


 SDWA; 40 CFR  141


RCRA; 40 CFR 261


RCRA; 40 CFR 262


RCRA; 40 CFR 263


RCRA; 40 CFR 264
 Description                                Type

 Guideline* and requirements for worker* at   actioa
 hazardous waste  site*  (subpart 120)  and
 ataodards for air contaminants (subpart 1)

 National Ambient air quality standards         chemical
 National  ambient   air  quality standards    location
 attainment areas

 New source performance standards            action
National emission standards for hazardous air    action,
pollutants                                  chemical

Treatment system discharge standards          action,
                                          chemical

Approved   lest  methods  for  discharge    action
monitoring

National primary drinking water standards       chemical
Determination of whether                   action,
a waste is hazardous                        chemical

Hazardous waste generator requirements       action
Hazardous waste transporter requirements      action
TSDF standards
action,
chemical,
location
           Reason for Listing

           May relate to remediation
           of all areas.
May  relate  to  on-site
treatment of wastes.

May  relate  to  on-site
treatment of wastes.

May  relate  to  on-site
treatment of wastes.

May  relate  to  on-site
treatment of wastes.

May  relate to  ground
water remediation.

May  relate to  ground
water remediation.

May relate to remediation
of ground water.

May relate to remediation
of all areas.

May  relate to  off-site
disposal of wastes.

May  relate to  off-site
disposal of wastes.

May relate to remediation
of all areas.

-------
        APPENDIX IV



STATE LETTER OF CONCURRENCE

-------
Now York State Department of Environmental Conservation
60 Wolf Road, Albany, New Yortc 12233
                                                                         Thorns* C. Jorilng
                                                                         CommlMloner
                                              JUN 30 I992
  MB.  Kathleen C. Callahan
  Director
  Emergency  & Remedial Response Division
  USEPA, Region XX
  26 Federal Plaza
  New  York,  NY  10278

  Dear MB. Callahan:

             R«:  Facet Enterprises Site/ Chemung Co, MY
                  Record of Decision

        The purpose of this letter is to confirm the New York State Department  of
  Environmental Conservation's concurrence with USEPA 'a Record of Decision  for the
  Facet Enterprises NPL site in Elmira Heights, NY.  The selected remedial  measure
  will remove a significant source of groundwater contamination in the Newtown Creek
  Aquifer.

        The ROD notes that EPA will evaluate the need for further action in  areas
  1,2, and 3 based on the results of confirmatory sampling performed after  the drum
  removal.  NYSDEC must have the opportunity to review and concur with this decision
  when it is made.

        We  greatly appreciate USEPA' s efforts to have as much contaminated material
  as possible removed from the site for proper treatment and disposal.  However,  as
  mentioned  in the ROD, some hazardous substances will remain on- site,  we  support
  efforts to restrict access to this site in the future to prevent inadvertent human
  exposure to these substances.  A deed restriction would be the most effective  means
  to accomplish this.  If this option is unavailable, then NYSDEC and NYSDOH  retain
  the  option of filing a deed notification letter with the appropriate local
  authorities.

                                       Sincerely,
                                       Michael J. O'Toole, Jr.  P.E.
                                       Director
                                       Division of Hazardous Waste Remediation
 GC/kp

 cc:    A. Carlson
                                       Post-It" brand fax transmffial memo 76H
                                                                             TOTflL P. 01

-------