EPA (Environmental Protection Agency)
Method Study 24, Method 601—Purgeable
Ealocarbons by the Purge Trap Method
Monsanto Co., Dayton, OH
Prepared for
Environmental Monitoring and Support Lab.
Cincinnati, OH
Jul 84
-------
RtPORT DATA
(Please read >r,struclio.-u on the rvfrw he/we completing}
1. REPORT NO.
EPA-600/4-84-064
|3 RECIPI
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
EPA Method Study 24, Method 601 —
Purgeable Halocarbons by Purge and Trap
6. BePOBT CATS
July 1984
'C *iCCESJ
1*1 _1
NO.
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
B. J. Warner, C. S. Friedman, L. Metcalfe, T. J, Morrow
A. D. Snyder, and C. R. McMillin
8. PERFORMING ORQMNIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDPESS
Monsanto Company
1515 Nicholas Road
Dayton, OH 45407
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
CBL1A
II.CONTfiACtTGRANT NO.
68-03-2856
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
Quality Assurance Branch, EMSt-Cincinnati
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
26 W. St. Clair Street
Cincinnati, OH 4b268
13. TYPE Of REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final 9-79 to 12-82
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CCDF
EPA 600/06
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
The experimental design and results of a validations study for an analytical
method to detect 29 halocarbons in water are described herein. In Method 601, the
halocarbosis are purged by an inert gas which is bubbled through the aqueous sample.
The vapors are then trapped in a short column containing a suitable sorbent. The
trapped components are then thermally desorbed onto the head of a chroniatograph-jc
column and measured by means of halide specific detector. In this study, the 29
halocarbon compounds were divided into three separate mixes to minimize interferences
from co-eluting peaks. The spiking solutions employed in the study contained the 29
halocarbons at six concentrations. Six water matrices were used in the study:
distilled water, drinking water, and s surface water all supplied by the cooperating
laboratories; and three industrial wastewaters supplied by the Monsanto Company.
Statistical analyses and conclusions 1n this report are based on analytical data
obtained by 20 collaborating laboratories, v „
17.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
fc.lDENTIPIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release to Public
t8. SECURITY CLASS (This Reportf
Unclassified
20. SECURITY CLASS (Tilt page)
Unclassified
c. COSATI Field/Group
21. NO. OF PAGES
23. PRICE
2230-1 (R«*. 4-77)
EDITION i» O»»OLETE
-------
EPA-600/4-84-064
July 1984
EPA METHOD STUDY 24, METHOD 601- PURGEABLE
HALOCARBONS BY THE PURGE TRAP METHOD
by
Beverly J. Warner, Charles S. Friedman, Leroy Metcalfe,
Thomas J. Morrow, Arthur D. Snyder, and Carl R. McMillin
Monsanto Company
Dayton, Ohio 45407
Contract No. 68-03-2856
PROJECT OFFICER
Raymond Wesselman
Quality Assurance Branch
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory
Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND SUPPORT LABORATORY
OFFICE OF RESEAP.CH AND DEVELOPMENT
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Cincinnati, Ohio 45268
-------
DISCLAIMER
The information in this document has been funded v/holly or in part
by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under con-
tract 68-03-2856 to Monsanto Company. It has been subject to the
Agency's peer administrative review, and it has been approved for
publication as an EPA docment. Mention of trade names or commer-
cial products does not constitute endorsement or recoiunendation
for use.
il
-------
FOREWORD
Environmental measurements are required to determine the quality
of ambient waters and the character of waste effluents. The
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory (EMSL)-Cincinnati's
research responsibilities are to:
• Develop and evaluate techniques to measure the presence and
concentration of physical, chemical, and radiological pollu-
tants in water, wastewater, bottom sediments, and solid waste.
• Investigate methods for the concentration, recovery, and
identification of viruses, bacteria, and other microorganisms
in water.
• Conduct studies to determine the responses of aquatic organ-
isms to water quality.
• Conduct an Agency-wide quality assurance program to assure
standardization and quality control of systems for monitoring
water and wastewater.
This publication reports the results of EPA's interlaboratory
study for analysis of 28 priority pollutants by the method 601
purge and trap technique.
Federal agencies, states, municipalities, universities, private
laboratories, and industry should find this evaluative study of
assistance in monitoring and controlling pollution in the
environment.
Robert L. Booth, Acting Director
Environmental Monitoring & Support Laboratory
iii
-------
ABSTRACT
An interlaboratory method study to detect 28 halocarbons in water
is described herein. In Method 601, the halocarbons are purged by
an inert gas which is bubbled through the aqueous sample. The
vapors are trapped in a short column containing a suitable sorbent.
The trapped components are then thermally desorbed onto the head
of a chromatographic column and measured by means of a halide-
specific detector. In this study the 28 halocarbon compounds
were divided into three separate mixes to minimize interferences
from co-eluting peaks. The spiking solutions employed in the
study contained the 29 halocarbons at six concentrations. Six
water matrices were x-sed in the study: a distilled, drinking,
and surface water supplied by the cooperating laboratories; and
three industrial wastewaters supplied by Monsanto Company.
Statistical analyses and conclusions in this report are based on
analytical data obtained by 20 collaborating laboratories.
Participating laboratories were selected based upon technical
evaluation of proposals and upon the analytical results of pre-
study samples. Data obtained from the interlaboratory study were
analyzed employing EPA's computer programs known as the Interlab-
oratory Method Validation Study (IMVS) system, which are designed
to implement the concepts recommended in ASTM Standard D 2777.
The statistical analyses included rejection of outliers, estimation
of mean recovery (accuracy), estimation of single-analyst and over-
all precisions, and tests for the effects of water type on accuracy
and precision.
IV
-------
This report, was submitted in fulfillment of contract 68-03-2C56
by Monsanto Company under the sponsorship of the U.S. Environmen-
tal Protection Agency and covers a period from September 1979 to
December 1982.
-------
CONTENTS
Foreword.
Abstract 1V
Tables vii
Acknowledgments . xiv
1. Introduction 1
2. Conclusions 3
3. Recommendations 16
4. Description of Study . 18
Selection of participating laboratories 18
Phase I - analysis of prestudy samples 28
Phase II - prestudy conference 29
Phase III - inter laboratory method 30
5. Statistical Treatment of. Data 35
Rejection of outliers , 35
Statistical summaries ... 40
Regression analysis of basic statistics 43
Comparison of accuracy and precision
across water types 45
6. Results and Discussion 52
Accuracy- 52
Precision 58
Effects of water types 63
Response to Questionnaire 65
References 78
Appendices
A. Test Method; Purgeable halocarbons - Method 601. . 80
B. Additional notes on Method 601 sent to
participating laboratories for prestudy
conference analyses , 91
C. Raw Data: Method 601 95
D. Statistical summaries for purgeable
hydrocarbons by water type . 198
E. Effects of water type on precision and accuracy. . 227
VI
-------
TABLES
Number Page
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Regression Equations for Accuracy and Precision. .
F.evised Equations for Accuracy and Precision . . .
Participating Laboratories
Procedures for Preparation of Stock Solutions. . . .
Procedures for Preparation of Aqxieous Calibration
Standards
Procedures for Spiking Water
List of Suppliers for Volatile Organic Compounds . .
Maintenance Procedure for Hall 700 Detector
Concentrations of Method 601 Parameters in
Spiked Solutions
Youden Laboratory Ranking Procedure for Chloro-
methane Data in Water 6
Critical Values for Thompson's T (Two-Sided
When Standard Deviation is Calculated
^rom the Same Sample
Results of Test for Individual Outliers
( Chi orome thane in Water 6)
Overall Percent Relative Standard Deviations ....
Single-Analyst Percent Relative Standard Deviations.
Summary of the Tests for Difference Across
Water Tvoes ...
4
12
21
23
24
25
26
31
38
39
40
53
59
61
64
Vli
-------
TABLE (continued)
Number
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Laboratory Analytical Conditions , . . .
Raw Data for Trichlorofluoromethane Analysis
by Water Type
Raw Data for Chloromethane Analysis by
Water Type , . . . .
Raw Data for Vinyl Chloride Analysis by
Water Type
Raw Data for trans-1, 2-Dichloroethene
Analysis by Water Type
Raw Data for 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane Analysis by
Water Type
Raw Data for Trichloroethene Analysis by Water
Type
Raw Data for Dibrcmcchloromethane Analysis by
Water Type ...
Raw Data for 2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether Analysis
by Water Type ,
Raw Data for Tetrachloroethene Analysis by
Water Type
Raw Data for 1,2-Dichlorobenzene Analysis by
Water Type
Raw Data for Bromomethane Analysis by Water
Type
Raw Data for Chloroethane Analysis by Water
Type . . . .
Raw Data for l,l~Dichloroethene Analyses by
Water Type
Raw Data for Chloroform Analysis by Water
Type
Page
66
96
99
102
105
108
. Ill
, 114
. 117
. 120
. 123
126
. 129
. 132
. 135
viii
-------
TABLES (continued)
Nun.ber Page
32 Raw Data for Carbon Tetrachloride Analysis by
Water Type 138
33 Raw Data for trans-l,3-Dicbloropropene Analysis
by Water Type 141
34 Paw Data for 1,1,2-Trichloroethane Analysis by
Water Type 144
35 Rav Data for Bromoform Analysis by Water Type. . . . 147
36 Raw Data for Chlorobenzene Analysis by Water
Type 150
37 Raw Data for 1,4-Dichlorobenzene Analysis by
Water Type 153
38 Raw Data for Methylene Chloride Analysis by
Water Type 156
39 Raw Data for 1,1-Dichloroethane Analysis by
Water Type 159
40 Raw Data for 1,2-Dichloroethane Analysis by
Water Type 102
41 Paw Data for Eromodichloromethana Analysis by
Water Type 165
42 Raw Dav.a for 1,2-Dichloropropane Analysis by
Water Type 168
43 Raw Data for cis-1,3-Dichloropropene Analysis
by Water Type 171
44 Raw Data for 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane Analysis
by Water Type 174
45 Raw Data for 1,3-Dichlorobenzene Analysis by
Water Type 177
46 Legend for Tables 63 Through 65 180
47 Blank Values (pg/L) - Mix #1 181
-------
TABLE?, (continued)
Number I-age
48 Blank Values (pg/L) - Mix #2 186
49 Blank Values (j;g/!.) - Mix #3 192
50 Statistical Summary for Trichlorofuoronethane
Analyses by Water Type 199
51 Statistical Summary tor Chloromethane Analyse*
by Water Type 200
52 Statistical Summary for Vinyl Chloride Analyses
by Water Type 201
53 Statistical Summary for trans~l,2-Dichloroethene
Analyses by Water Type ......... 202
54 Statistical Summary for 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Analyses by Water Type 203
55 Statistical Summary for Trichloroethene
Analyses by Water Type 204
56 Statistical Summary for 2-Chloroet.hylvinyl
Ether Analyses by Water Type 205
57 Statistical Summary for Dibromochloromethane
Analyses by Water Type 206
58 Statistical Summary for T^trachloroethene
Analyses by Water Type ..... 207
59 Statistical Summary for 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Analyses by Water Type 208
60 Statistical Summary for Bromomethane Analyses
by Water Type " 209
61 Statistical Summary for Chloroethane Analyses
by Water Type 210
62 Statistical Summary for 1,1-Dichloroethene
Analyses by Water Type 211
63 Statistical Summary for Chloroform Analyses
by Water Type 212
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number Page
64 Statistical Summary for Carbon Tetrachloride
Analyses by Water Type 213
65 Statistical Summary for trans-1,3-Dichloro-
propene Analyses by Water Type 214
66 Statistical Summary for 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Analyses by Water Type 215
67 Statistical Summary for Bromcform Analyses by
Water Type 216
68 Statistical Summary foi^ Chlorobenzene Analyses
by Water Type 21V
69 Statistical Summary for 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Analyses by Water Type 218
70 Statistical Summary for Methylene Chloride
Analyses by Water Type 219
71 Statistical Summary for 1,1-Dichloroethane
Analyses by Water Type 220
72 Statistical Summary for i,2-Dichloroethane
Analyses by Water Type 221
73 Statistical Summary for Bromodichloromethane
Analyses by Water Type 222
74 Statistical Summary for 1,2-Dichloropropane
Analyses by Water Type 223
75 Statistical Summary for ci's-1,3-Dichloropropene
Analyses by Water Type 224
76 Statistical Summary for 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloro-
ethane Analyses by Water Type 225
77 Statistical Summary for 1,3-Dichlorobenzene
Analyses by Water Type 226
78 Effect of Water Type On Trichlorofluoromethane
Analyses 228
79 Effect of Water Type On Chioromethane Analyses . . . 229
80 Effect of Water Type On Vinyl Chloride Analyses. . . 230
XI
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number
61
62
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
Effect of Water Type On tran3-l,2-Dichloroethene
Analyses
Effect of Water Type On 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane
Analyses
Effect of Water Type On Trichloroethene
Analyses
Effect of Water Type On Dibromochloromethane
Analyses
Effect of Water Type On Tetrachloroethens
Analyses
Effect of Water Type On 1,2-Dichlorpbenzene
Analyses
Effect of Water Type On Bromomethane Analyses. . . .
Effect of Water Type On Chloroethane Analyses. . . .
Effect of Water Type On 1, 1-Dichloroethene
Analyses
Effect of Water Type On Chloroform Analyses
Effect of Water Type On Carbon Tetrachloride
Analyses
Effect of Water Type On trans-l,3-Dichloro-
propene Analyses
Effect of Water Type On 1,1, 2-Trichloroethane
Analyses
Effect of Water Type On Bromoform Analyses
Effect of Water Type On Chlorobenzene
Analyses
Effect of Water Type On 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Analyses
ZZ2S.
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
Xll
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number
97 Effect of Water Type On Methylene Chloride
Analyses 247
98 Effect of Water Type On 1,1-Dichloroethane
Analyses 248
99 Effect of Water Type On 1,2-Dichloroethane
Analyses 249
100 Effect of Water Type On Bromodichloromethane
Analyses 250
101 Effect of Water Type On 1,2-Dichlcropropane
Analyses 251
102 Effect of Water Type On cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Analyses 252
103 Effect of Water Type On 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloro-
ethane Analyses 253
104 Effect of Water Type On 1,3-Dichlorobenzene
Analyses 254
Xlll
-------
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors gratefully acknowledge the hard work and cooperation
of the staff of the Quality Assurance Branch, EMSL-Cincinnati, who
assisted in the study. They especially acknowledge the excellent
technical assistance, guidance, and understanding of Raymond Vessel-
man of EMSL-Cincinnati. Also acknowledged is the work of Dr.
Thomas Bis.hop at Battelle Memorial Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio.
for statistical analysis of the data under contract No. 68-03-2624.
xiv
-------
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
The analytical laboratories of the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) gather water quality data to provide information on
water resources, to assist research activities, and to evaluate
pollution abatement activities. The success of these pollution
control activities, particularly when legal action is involved,
depends upon the reliability of the data provided by the labora-
tories.
Under provisions of the Clean Water \ct, the EPA is required to
promulgate guidelines establishing test procedures for the analy-
sis of pollutants. The Clean Water Act Amendments of 1977 empha-
size the control of toxic pollutants and declare the 65 "priority"
pollutants and classes of pollutants to be toxic under Section
307(a) of the Act. ~ This report is one of a series that investi-
gates the analytical behavior of selected priority pollutants,
The EMSL-Cincinnati of the EPA develops analytical methods and
conducts a quality assurance program for the water laboratories
which is designed to increase the reliability and legal defensi-
bility of water quality information collection by EPA laboratories,
The responsibility for quality assurance (QA) is assigned to the
Quality Assurance Branch (QAB). One of the QA activities is to
conduct interlaboratory tests of the methods. This study reports
the results of the interlaboratory study on Method 601 (Study 24).
-------
The study consisted of three distinct phases. Phase I involved
the analysis of two prestudy samples per analyte by the 20 partici-
pating laboratories in order that they become familiar with the
methodology employed and to identify any potential problems associ-
ated with the analytical methodology. The purgeable halocarbons,
were combined into three mixes to minimize interferences from co-
eluting chrowatographic peaks. These mixes were supplied by Mon-
santo (MC) at two concentrations in sealed glass ampuls. The
higher concentration mixes were spiked into drinking water supplied
by the individual participating laboratories and the lower concen-
tration mixes were spiked into a wastewater sample supplied by MC.
/» short report, including the data obtained and any potential pro-
blems encountered, was sent to MC by each participating laboratory
at the completion of Phase I.
Phase II consisted of a prestudy conference held at EMSL-Cincinnati.
Each subcontracting laboratory sent at least one participant to the
meeting. The analyst, or principal analyst if more than one was
involved, attended this meeting. This meeting held after the data
from the prestudy had been evaluated, examined the results of the
prestudy and discussed problems encountered in the methodology.
Phase III consisted of the formal interlaboratory study. In the
case of Method 601, the analyses of three mixes at each of six
concentrations (three Youden pairs) was required in six different
water matrices. In addition, the participating laboratories per-
formed an analysis of all water blanks with no spiked compounds.
Each participating laboratory then issued a report to MC containing
all data obtained, copies of representative chrotnatograms, and any
comments.
The final step in the study was a statistical analysis of all data
by Battelle Memorial Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio, under contract
68-03-2624 employing EPA's 1WS system.
-------
SECTION 2
CONCLUSIONS
The object of this study was to characterize the performance of
Method 601 in terms of accuracy, overall precision, single-analyst
precision and the effect of water typee on accuracy and precision.
Through statistical analyses of 26,160 analytical values, esti-
i
mates of accuracy and precision were made and expressed as regres-
sion equations, which are shown in Tables 1 and 2. Table 1 pre-
sents the linear regression equations as originally calculated by
EPA's Intel-laboratory Method Validation Study (IMVS) system of
computer programs. A detailed examination of the analytical 'data
results in the revised equations presented in Table 2 for 10 of
the 28 compounds. Of the 26,160 analytical values only 17% were
rejected as outliers.
The accuracy of the method is obtained by comparing the mean
recovery to the true values of concentration. For all but two of
the 27 analytes, the average accuracy over all six waters ranged
from 83% to 108%. The two exceptions were trans-l,3-dichloropro-
pene at 76% and cis-l,3-dichloropropene at 56% which were found to
be unstable.
The overall stanaa; d deviation indicates the precision associated
with measurements generated by a group of laboratories. The per-
cent relative standard deviation (%RSD) over six waters ranges
from 16% to 29% for all but four of the 27 analytes. Exceptions
include cis-l,3-dichloropropene at 40%, bromomethane gas at 42%,
trans-l.S-dichloropropene at 45%, and chloromethane gas at 50%.
-------
TMU 1. RBGfSISSIOft EQUATIONS K» ACCURACY AND PRECISION
MATER TT?B
APPLICABLE CWTC. RAKE
DISTILLED H»TSB
SINGLE-AMALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
TAP WftTSR
SINCU-ARUYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
scitnct K&TZR
3IWLB-AJOLTST PRCCISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCORACY
BASTE HATES 1
SIKSLE-ARALYST KECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
VAST! tSTXR 2
S1ROLS-ABALTS7 PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
HASTE MATER 3
SIBGLE-&KALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ATOIRACY
TRICHLOROFLUORU&TKAHS CHLOROMETHAi
(8.00 - 499
.00)
SX • 0.1SX » 0.67
S • 0.26X «•
X • 0.89C •
SB • 0.22X
S * 0.30X *
X - 0.92C -
SB * 0.1SX
• " 0.25X «
X • 0.9SC -
SB " 0.1BX
S « 0.31X »
X • 0.96C -
SB « 0.14X
S « 0.28X +
X - 0.92C -
SR • C.I6X
S - 0.29X +
X « 0.96C -
0.91
0.07
• 0.03
0.64
1. 21
- 0.42
0.02
1.11
* 0.46
0.20
0.86
* 0.69
0.26
1.17
» 1.12
0.75
1.57
(8.00 - 499
SS i
S •
X •
SR >
S «
X "
> 0.28X
O.S2X +
0.77C *
• 0.26X
0.49X +
0.91C -
Sa • 0.24X
S *
X -
SR •
S «
X -
SR >
S -
X *
SR '
S «
X «
0.55S »
0 99C -
• 0.22S
P.49X +
O.S4C -
• 0.13X
O.S8X ^
0.81C -
• 0.1«X
n
.00)
• 0.31
1.31
0.18
+ 0.27
1.51
0.99
« 1.26
0.45
2.07
+ 2.27
1. 35
0.87
+ 3.19
1.11
0.16
+ 4-99
0.38X » 5.31
0.7CC + 6.44
VIHTL CHLORIDE
(a. oo - soo
SR <
S »
X -
SR '
S *
X »
• 0.13X
0.27X *
0.97C -
• 0.14X
O.J2X *
1.06C -
SR • 0.16X
S •»
X «
SR
S «
X »
sa
s »
X *
SR
S »
X »
0.33X -
1 12C -
" 0.12X
0.22X »
1.13C -
* 0.12S
0.37X -
1.08C -
« 0.09X
.00)
» 0.6S
0.40
0.3&
- 0.17
0.07
1.36
+ 0.15
0.29
1.59
+ 1.00
i.06
2.63
+ 1.69
0.10
2.16
•f 2.04
0.21X > 1.36
1.14C -
• 1.05
TRUSS - 1 , 2 - D I CHU)BO«TKC«S
(8.00 - SO".
SR -
S »
X •
sa •
s •
X *
SR •
S *
X "
sa <
s «
X "
SS '
s «
x •=
SR <
s =
X =•
,00)
O.HX + 1.46
o.m +
0.97C -
> O.I6X '
0.24X +
0.98C -
1.46
0.16
» 0.29
0.95
1.02
• C.12J! * 0 36
0.21K *
1.03C -
' O.S3X
0.23X »
1.02C -
° 0.10X
0.15X 4
l.OOC -
« 0.14X
0.28S *
1.03C -
0.59
0.95
» 0.27
0.96
1.55
» J.ll
1.47
0.30
< 1.10
1.21
0.90
X « MEAIi RBCOVHTT
C • TRW VALUE TO* THE COBCTWTRATIOK
-------
TABLE 1 (continued)
WATER TYPE
APPLICABLE CONC. RANGE
DISTILLED WATER
SINGLE-AKALTST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
TAP WATER
SINCLE-AKALTST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
sonnet ram
SinCLE-HULTST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCdSUtCY
WASTE WATER 1
S18QLE-A8ALYJT PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
WASTE WATER 2
SI8CLE-AHALTST PRECISION
OVESALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
WASTE WATER 3
S!«CLr-A*ALYST PRECISION
OVEP JJ. PRECISION
ACCURACY
1.1
,1-TRICtOOROETKAHE TRICHLOROETHEKE*
(8.00 • 500.00)
SR • 0.1SX + 0.04
S * 0.20X + 0.37
X « 0.90C - 0.16
SR
S "
X -
SR
S •
X •
SR
S "
X »
SR
S "
X -
SR
S «
X »
• 0.14X
0.27X -
O.MC <
• 0.14X
0.23X •
0.94C -
» 0.15X
0.30X +
0.94C -
» O.IOX
0.22X »
0.92C +
* 0.18X
0.37X -
1.11C -
- 0.33
0.76
0.02
- 0.17
0.67
0.00
+ 1.65
1.24
0.51
+ i.oi
0.91
0.42
+ 2 93
0.50
0.17
(S.OO - 501
SR • 0.13X
S • 0.23X +
X « 1.32C -
SR -
S *
X •
SR -
S,'
X *
SR <>
S »
S «
SS *
S *
X *
SR *
S -
X *
0.13X
0.32S -
1.40C -
0.13X
0.37X -
1.46C -
' g.tox
0.27X +
1.3SC -
0.16X
8.25X +
1.41C -
0.15X
0.28X +
1.40C -
.00)
- 0.03
0.30
2.52
» 0.23
0.57
3.26
-0.39
0.90
4.16
•» 2.22
1.41
2.49
- 0.41
0.50
3.14
+ 0.83
0.47
2.32
DIBROHOCHLOROHETHANZ 2-CHLOROfmm.Vttm. ETHER*
(8.
SR
S *
X «
SR
S »
X «
SR
S =
X »
SR
S »
X *
SR
S =
X =
SR
S =
X =
00 - 484
» 0.11X
0.24X +
0.94C +
= O.IOX
0.23X +
0.98C +
« 0.12X
0.25X +
0.92C +
= o.osx
0.14X +
0.92C +
= O.IOX
o..?sx +
0.95C +
« 0.13X
0.28X +
0.97C +
.00) (8.00 - 501.00)
+ 1.10
1.68
2.72
+ 1.55
0.91
2.89
+ 1.22
1.44
1.45
+ 3 74
3.68
2.44
+ 2.99
2 46
3.27
+ 0.49
1.1B
3.98
X • K2AH RECOVERT
C » TRUE VALUE FOR TMB CONCENTRATION
• * Revised equation* presented in Table 2
-------
TABLE 1 (continued)
WATER TTPR
APPLICABLE CWIC. RANGE
DISTILLED RA1SR
SINGLE-ANALYST PREaSION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
TAP M»TSR
SIHCLE-AHALYST PRSaSION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
SURFACE NATES
SIMSLB-Att&LYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
efcsni warn i
SIBOLB-WOU.TST PRSCISJCN
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
WASTE HATER 2
OVESAli PRECISION
ACCURACY
WASTE WiTBI 3
SnCU-AKJLLTST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
TETRACHLOIIOETHEHE
(8.00 - 500.00)
SR • 0.14X » 0.38
S • 0.1BX * 2.21
X • 0.94C * 0.06
SR » 0.17X » 0.96
S » 0.2SX + 0.58
X « 0.96C + 0.35
SR - 0.13X
S - 0.22X +
R - 0.97C -
SR •
S -
X •
' 0.22X
0.35X »
0.65C »
» 0.71
O.S6
0.66
* 2.54
2.33
0.03
SB * C.18X •» 0.20
S " 1.2f>X » 0.57
X • 0.96C - 0.12
SR '
S *
X »
« 0.13X + 1.03
0.26X * 1.1.1
0.96C * 1.24
1 . 2-DICHLOROFSHZEKE*
(8.00 - 501.00)
SR " 0.10X * 0.97
S • 0.13X 4 6.13
X - 0.93C + 1.70
SR -
S «
X *
SR »
S »
X =
SR >
S *
X «
0.12 »
0.17X +
0.9JC *
2.02
2.26
1.12
0.09S +0.11
0.19K » 0.38
0.90C - 0.28
< 0.14X
0.19X +
0.89C -
SR «• 0.13X
S « 0.18X *
X « 0.91C •
SR = O.IOS
S » 0.17X »
X = 0.91C -
+ C.66
3. JO
9.29
+ 0.65
1.26
0.47
+ 0.72
1.79
0.71
x = mia RgcovgRT
C * TKUC VALUE FOR Iff. COHCC«rTRATIO«
• « Revised equ&tion* presented In Table 2
-------
TABLE 1 (continued)
WATER TYPE
APPLICABLE CONC. RANGE
DISTILLED WATER
SINGLE-ANALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
TAP WATER
SINGLE-ANALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
SURFACE WATER
SINGLE-ANALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
WASTE W1TK8 1
SINGLE-ANALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
WASTE WATSR 2
SINGLE-ANALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
WASTE WATER 3
SINGLE-ANALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
BROHOHETHANE6
(8.00 - 499
SR
S «
X •
SR
S «
X '
SR
S *
X -
SR
S =
X *
SR
S =
X «
SR
S "
X =
* 0.28X
0.36X +
0.76C -
= 0.24S
0.65X -
1.03C -
= 0.23X
0.45X +
0.91C -
• O.llX
0.40X +
0.79C +
- 0.13X
0.40X +
0.82C -
» 0.12X
.00)
+ 0.27
0.94
1.27
+ 0.12
0.82
3.70
+ 1.37
1.29
2.05
+ 1.6S
1.69
0.03
+ 2.57
0.69
1.29
+ 0.62
0.26X » 2.13
0.69C » 0 48
CHLOROETHANE
(8. 00 - 498
SR * 0.14X
S » 0.1 JX +
X - 0.99C -
SR • 0.07X
S = 0.19X +
X » 1.08C -
SR = 0.18X
S * 0.22X +
X = 1.11C -
SR * o.oax
S = 0.09X +
X » 1.01C »
SH « 0.07X
S = 0.22X »
X * I. IOC -
SR « 0.10X
S » 0.29X +
X - I.09C -
.00)
- 0.13
0.63
1.53
•
* 0.65
0.39
1.97
+ 0.17
1.70
1.61
+ 0.45
5.79
0.61
+ 1.16
0.87
2.58
+ 1.02
0.35
1.50
1.
<8
SR
S
X
SR
S
X
SR
S
X
SR
S
X
SR
S
X
SR
S
X
l-DICHLOROETHENE*
.00 - 499
= 0.21X
= 0.29X -
» 0.98C -
» 0.12X
- 0.31X -
- 1.03C -
= 0.10X
= 0.21X +
= 0.98C ^
= 0.19X
- 0 28X +
= 0 93C -
= 0.07X
= 0 32X +
= ! .CISC -
= 0.14X
= 0 20X +
* 1 02C -
.00)
- 0 23
0.40
0.87
+ 0 13
0.71
1.16
T 1 46
1.24
0.05
- 0.81
0.14
0.07
+ 1.62
0.34
1.82
- 0 58
0 "'O
0 82
CHLOROFORK
(8
SR
S
X
SR
S
X
SR
S
X
SR
S
X
5R
S
X
SR
S
X
.00 - 501
» 0.13X
= 0.19X -
^ 0.93C -
= 0.05X
* 0.09X »
00)
+ 0 15
0 02
0.3?
+ 5.58
6.21
' 0.90C + 3.44
= 0.12X
* 0 20X +
= 0.95C «
= 0.13X
» 0.1BX »
= 0.90C +
' 0 10X
= o.nx <
= 0.95C -
= 0 07X
^ 0.1 9X +
* 0 95C »
+ 1.48
0.50
0.29
+ 0.47
i.Ot
0.49
» 0 75
0 11
0.55
+ 2 93
2.26
0.29
I * MEAN RECOVERY
C * TRUE VALUE FOR THE COHCEMTRAT10H
• = Reviled equation presented in Table 2
b * Further concents contained in Section 6
-------
mtE 1 (continued)
»TCK TTO
iTPLICiBLT. COIfC. WWGS
DISTIUZD WmtR
si«sLi-Ajai.TST rszcisio*
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCUSACT
TAP tan*
SIHCLE-AKALTST PttSCISZCM
OVESAU. precision
ACCURACT
si&fAcv mna
SHGU-ASALTST mCISIGH
OVERALL memo
ACCURACY
W25TE WTO 1
SIBSU-AJOLTST PffECISIO*
OVERALL rrxcmai
ACCCSACT
EASTS van* 2
SlBGU-AmtTST PSfCISIOM
OVEMU HOCXS10M
tCOJRACT
tatsTC wra 9
SUKU-AKALTST PRZCISIOH
OVESAU. memo*
ACCURACT
CARBON TmiACHLOSlOe
(8.00 - 501.00)
SB « 0.155 4 0.38
S • 0.20X * 0.39
X " 0.98C - 1.04
S* » O.HW + 1.57
S > 0.20X * 1.04
I • l.OOC - 2.20
SB • 0.13X - 0.21
S - 0.20K - 0.30
S » 0.«C - 0.39
SS » 0.101! 4 0.90
S - 0.23X » 1.09
X • 0.92C - 2.02
S8 • 0.091 * 1.33
S - 9.21S * 9.47
X • 0 95C - O.*l
St - 0,101 * 1,10
S » 0.22X « 2.62
X « 1.02C - 1.62
TRUSS- 1 . 3-DICHLOROPBOPEKE*
(8.00 - 408.00)
SS « 0.1SX * 0.14
S • 0.40X + 0.26
X - 0.74C - U.23
SB « 0.14V 4 0.64
S " 0.39X * 0.79
£ • 0.60C * 0 26
SR « 0.17X « 1.01
S » 0.39S + 0.73
X = 0.75C t t.ll
SR « 0.23X * 1.14
S <• 0.64X ' t.60
X • 0.7ZC •> 0.25
ss * o.m ^ 1.20
S « 0.37X + 0.91
S » 0.8SC - 0.59
SR = 0.20X - 0.55
S * 0.51X t 1.78
K « 0.78C + 1.36
1,1, 2-rRIOCXJROCTHWW''1
(8.00 - 499.00)
SR » O.UX - 0.04
S » 0.19X » 0.67
X * 0.86C » 0.30
SB " 0.06X « 0.99
S •> 0.19X * 0.69
X « O.B4C + 0.03
58 « 0,12X » 0.47
S « O.Z^X + O.OJ
X • 0.65C + 0.39
3K - 0.17X + 0.15
S = 0.2«X * 1.53
S = 0.73C » 0.03
SR * 0.09S » O.E3
S = 0.19Z » C.79
X « 0.9JC - 0.40
SR » 0.08X » 1.52
S • 0.22!5 » 1.73
S * 0.92C - 0.15
DRCWOfOSH
(a. oo - &oa. co)
sa » o.ux * c.vs
S « 0.211 * 2.41
X • 0.96C - 2.01
SR « l.JOX * 0.20
S » 0.24X » 1.25.
X » 1.02C - 1 81
SR « 0.17X » 0.47
S « 0.20X i 1.41
X = 1.03C - 1.81
5k - 0.1M » 0.27
S » 0.21X « J-81
X* O-SIC - 0.39
S8 » 0.08X » 2.79
S » 0.22X » 2-82
X ' 3.97C -1.54
SS » 0.1. 'X « 1.77
S » 0.2ZS » 2.50
X « 1.31C - 1.00
S • HEAS KOOVZBT
C • THUE m0Z FOS 7?3 COHCEItrRATIOK
• " Revl*ed *qu*U«u presented in Table 2
-------
TUBLC 1
WATER TTPt
AmiCABU COKC. RANGE
DISTILLED WATCt
SINGLE -ANALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
TAP WATER
SINGLE-ANALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACOmACT
SURFACE WATER
SINGLE-ANALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACrUHACT
WASTE WATER 1
SINGLE-ANALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PKECISION
ACCURACY
WASTE WATER 2
SINGLE-ANALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
WASTE WATER 3
SINGLE-ANALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
iCCURACT
CHLOROBENZEH
•
(8.00 - 500.00)
SR » 0.15X -
S * 0.18X «
I • I.OOC -
SR « 0.07X 4
S - O.lbX 4
X « I.OOC -
SR » 0.12X 4
<5 » 0.18X 4
X - 0.98C -
SR " O.I4X 4
S - 0.33X 4
X » 0.93C 4
SR * 0.12X 4
S " 0.21X *
X • 0.93C -
SR •> o.iax 4
S « 0.36X »
X * 1.04C t
0.02
1.21
1.23
1.71
1.43
1.39
0.99
0.72
0.54
63.60
79.41
13.00
0.43
0.99
1.44
2 24
1.23
1.45
(continued)
1 ,4-DICHLOROBEMZEVE*
(8.00 - 499
SR
S *
X •
SR
S «
X «
SR
S •
X *
SR
S =•
X «
SR
S =
X =
SR
S «
X =
> 0.14X
0.2BX »
0.80C «
• O.lbX
0.20X 4
0.81C »
" 0.09X
0.23X -
0 84C »
= 0.17X
0.27X +
0.82C 4
» O.llX
0.30X 4
0.60C +
» O.lfeX
0.37X »
0.94C -
00)
- 0 03
0.13
1.23
4 0.22
0.74
0.60
4 0-87
0.54
1.06
» 0.9S
0.93
1.57
4 0.95
0.06
0.34
4 1 14
0.03
1 26
X ° HEM RECOVER?
C * TRUE VALUE FOR THE COMCEHTRATION
« « Reviled equations presented in Table 2
-------
TABLE 1 (continued)
WATER TTPS
APPLICABLE CCmC. RAMIE
PtSTlLUtt WATE»
D.'HQLS- ANALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
TAP WAT^K
SIHGLE-ANALTST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCIfSACY
STOM.CB WITH
SINCtE-AKALYST PRECISION
OVERAU. PSEC731CM
ACCURACY
WASTE WATgS 1
SIHGLE- ANALYST FRECISIOK
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
WASTE WATER 2
SINGLE- AM<ST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
WASTE WATt* 3
SINGLE- ANALYST PR2CI6ION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
HETHYLENE CHLORIDE
(6.00 - SOX. 00)
SR > 0.1U v 0.33
S • 0.21X + 1.43
X « 0.91C - 0.93
SR = 0.03X +1.04
S » 0.17X + 2.43
X » 0.97C - 1.50
SR « 0.08X + 1.44
S » 0.14X + 2.55
K - C.99C - 2.08
SR * O.OOX + 0.97
S = 0.18X + 1.50
X » i.OOC - 1.76
SR * 0.12* + 0.37
S * 0.20X + 1.11
K » 0.98C - 0.28
SR - 0.14X + 1.41
S = 0.19X + 1.91
X * 0.95C - 0.31
i . I-DICHLORCETHA.NK*'
(8.00 - 494.00)
S' • 0.09X * 0.17
S - 0.14X + 0.94
X » 0.95C - 1 08
SR " 0.09X + 0.47
S " 0.18X + 1.13
X • 0.93C - 2.04
SR » O.C6X + 0 68
S •» 0.14X + 1.C7
X * 0.97C •- 1.72
SR » 0.13X + 0.70
S = 0.16X + 0.90
X = 0.96C - > .21
SR « 0.13X + 0.17
S * 0 16X + 0.95
X » 0.96C - 0.32
SR - O.'.ZX + 0.24
S = O.lfcX + 0.20
X « 0.95C - 0.57
1 , 2-DJCHLOR06TKANr>
(8.00 - 500.00)
SK « 0.11X + 0.70
S » 0.1 SK » 0.94
X " 1 . 04C - 1.0*'
SR = 0.06X + 1 69
S - 0.1SX + !..?!
X « 1.03C - 0.41
SR « 0.08X + 0.73
S = 0.18/. + 0.89
X •• 1. QIC - 1.70
sa « o.i ax + 7. JS
S = 0.2SX + 9.59
X = P.86C + 11.31
SR « 0.10X » 0.53
S = 0.13X ^ 0.89
X « 0 S7C + 0.53
SR » 0.25X + 14 54
S = 0.71X +4.18
X = 0-39C » 50.00
BROWGDIOrCOSii
\8.00 - 501.1
?P - 0.11X +
S -• 0.20X «
X • J.12C -
SR » 0.1 IX +
S => 0.18X +
X » l.OQC «
SR - 0.0?X +
S = 0.17X +
X « 1.1 2C -
SR « O.inx <
S = 0.21X +
X = 1.01C +
SR = 0.09X •>
5=0 22X +
X « 1.09C -
SR = O.tZX <
S * 0.24X *
X = 1.04C +
xxraxx
00)
0.04
1.00
:.02
1.41
3.06
0.44
1.14
1.63
•1.09
0.32
• 2.20
1.02
0.4T
i J.33
l.SO
0,86
X • KEAN RECOVERY
C - THUS VALUE FOR THE CCHCEHTRATIOH
b • Further cansBentc contained in Section 6
-------
TABLE 1 (continued)
MATER TYPE
APPLICABLE CONC. RANGE
DISTILLED WATER
SINGLE-ANALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
TAP WATER
SINGLE-ANALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
SURFACE WATER
SINGLE-ANALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
WASTE WATER 1
SINGLE-ANALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
WASTE WATER 2
SINGLE-ANALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
WASTE WATER 3
SINGLE-ANALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
1 , 2-DICHLOHOPROPANE
(3.00 - 499
.00)
SR * 0.18X + 0.49
S = 0.28X +
X « 1.02C -
SR = 0.19X
S » 0.27X -
X = 0.98C +
SR •= 0.12X
S = 0.21X +
X = 0.91C -
SR = 0.17X
S = 0.30X +
X * 0.87C +
SR = 0.20X
S = 0.30X *
X = 1.04C -
SR = 0.21X
S * 0.33X +
X = 1.10C *
1.17
0.52
- 0.61
0.10
1.19
+ 0.67
0.94
0.42
+ 2.88
6,t>3
4.67
+ 1.42
1.63
0.82
+ 2.19
2.65
1.47
ClS-l,3-DICHLOhOPROPENEa 1,1,
(8.00 - 488.
SR =
S =
X =
SR =
S =
X =
0.11X +
0.38X -
0.59C -
0.17X -
O.J4X +
0.60C -
SR = 0.23X +
S =
X =
0.49X «•
0.56C -
00)
0.42
0.26
0.90
0.04
0.44
1 07
0.01
0.26
0.13
SR = 0.19X + 1.94
S =
X =
SR =
S =
X =
0.46X +
0.61C -
• 0.20X *
0.37X »
0.50C +
0.36
0.70
0.02
1.77
0.69
SR = 0.18X + 1.64
S =
X =
0.36X +
0.53C +
1.08
1.35
2 , 2-TETRACHLOROETHAHEa 1,3-DICHLOROBEMZEHE
(8.00 - 499.
SR =
S =
X =
SR *
S =
X =
SR =
S =
X =
SR =
S =
X =
SR =
S =
X =
0.14X +
0.23X +
0.9SC +
0.09X +
0.20X +
0.92C -
0.11X +
0.26X +
0.97C -
0.19X +
0.44X +
0.84C +
0.16X +
0.30X +
0.91C -
00)
2.41
2.79
0.19
1.42
1.65
0.60
1.03
0.44
0.82
9.29
3.99
7.12
0.87
1.26
0.15
SR = 0.15X + 2.33
S =
X =
0.28X *
l.OOC +
2.63
0.98
(8.
SR
S =
X =
SR
S -
X =
SR
S =
X =
SR
S =
X =
SR
S =
X =
SR
S =
X =
00 - 500.
= 0.14X +
0.26X «
0.95C +
00)
2.33
2.34
0.43
= 0.15X * 0.64
0.24X +
0.91C -
= 0.15X +
0.23X +
0.98C -
= 0.21X +
0.29X +
0.94C -
= 0.14X +
0.20X +
0.92C -
* 0.13X «
' 0.23X +
• 0.93C -
1.48
0.13
0.45
0.69
0.33
0.37
1.19
0.06
0.64
1.60
0.65
1.98
1.27
0.89
X « MEAN RECOVERY
C * TRUE VALUE FOR THE CONCENTRATION
a " Revised equations presented in Table 2
-------
K>
TABLE i. REVISED EQUATIONS FOR ACCURACY AND PRECISION
HATER TYPE TRICHLOROETHENE 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER 1,2-DICHLOROBEHZENE
APPLICABLE COMC. RANGE (8.00 - 501.00) (8.00 - 501.00) (8.00 - 501.00)
DISTILLED HATER
SINGLE-ANALYST PRECISION SR = 0.13X - 0.03 SR = 0.10X + 0.94 SR " 0.11X <• 0.64
OVERALL PRECISION S " 0.23X + 0.30 S = 0.29X * 1.65 S ' 0.158 + 5.90
ACCURACY X » 0.87C * 0.48 X » 0.93C + 0.77 X « 0.92C « 1.80
TAP HATER
SINGLE-ANALYST PRECISION SR « 0.13X + 0.23 SR = 0.19X - 1.03 SR « 0.12X + 2.02
OVEHALL PRECISION S » 0.32X - 0.57 S = 0.46X + 0.03 S = 0.17X * 2.26
ACCURACY X * 0.9ZC - 0.10 X = 0.72C + 1.00 X = 0.91C + 1.12
SURFACE WATER
SINGLE-ANALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
HASTE HATER 1
SINGLE- \NALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
HASTE HATER 2
S1KGLE-ANALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
HASTE HATER 3
SINGLE-AKALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
SR '
S «
X =
SR =
S =
X =
SR =
S =
X =
SR =
S =
X =
' 0.13X
0.37X -
0.97C -
= 0.10X
0.27X +
0.90C +
' 0.16X
0.2SX +
0.95C -
= 0.15X
0.28X +
1.11C +
- 0.39
0.00
0.88
+ 2.22
1.41
0.57
- 0.41
0.50
0.02
+- 0.83
0.47
0.86
SR '•
S =
X =
SR
S =
X =
SR
S =
X =
SR
S =
X =
= 0.23X
0.43X -
0.67C -
= 0.12X
0.41X +
1.01C -
= 0.14X
0..19X +
0.84C -
= 0.1GX
0.52X -
0.88C -
- 1.77
0.33
0.57
- 0.40
0.03
0.19
+ 0
0.
0.
+ 0
0.
0.
.07
23
00
.26
79
19
SR »
S *
X =
0.11X
0.21X +
0.89C -
SR = 0.14X
S = 0.19X +
X * 0.89C -
SR =
S =
X =
SR =
S =
X =
- 0.13X
0.13X 4
0.91C -
• 0.10X
0.17X H
0.91C •
- 0.03
0.22
0.19
4 0.66
3.30
0.29
+ 0.65
1.26
0.47
+ 0.72
>• 1.79
• 0.71
X = MEAN RECOVERY
C = TRUE VALUE FOR THE CONCENTRATION
-------
TABLE 2 (continued)
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE TRAN5-1,3-DICHLOROPROPEHE
WATER TYPE
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
(8.00 - O9.00)
SR » 0.13X - 0.04
S - 0.18X + 1.18
X * 0.87C - 0.00
APPLICABLE CONC. RANGE
DISTILLED WATER
SINGLE-ANALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
(B.OO * 499.00)
SR • 0.21X - 0.23
S > 0.29X - 0.40
X * 0.98C - 0.87
(8.00 - 488.00)
SR » 0.1SX + O.P3
S = 0.40X + 0.56
X * 0.74C + 0.02
TAP WATER
SINGLE-ANALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
SURFACE WATER
SIHCLE-AKALTST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
WASTE WATER 1
SINGLE-ANALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
WASTE WATER 2
SINGLE-ANALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
WASTE WATER 3
SINGLE-ANALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
SR = 0.12X 4 0.13
S = 0.31X - 0.71
X « 1.03C - 1.16
SR « 0.10X +1.46
S « 0.21X + 1.24
X » 0.93C + 0.05
SR * 0.19X - 0.80
S = 0.32X - 0.06
X = 0.93C - 0.06
SR = 0.07X * 1.82
S = 0.32X + 0.34
X - 1.05C - 1.82
SR » 0.14X - 0.58
S = 0.20X + 0.70
X = 1.02C - 0.82
SR
S »
X «
SR
S =
X =
SR
S =
X =
SR
S =
X =
SR
S =
X =
» 0.14X * 0.64
0.39X t 0.79
0.69C + 0.26
« 0.17X + 1.01
0.39X + 0.73
0.75C + 1.11
» 0.28X +1.14
0.64X + 1.60
0.72C + 0.25
= 0.11X + 1.28
0.40X + 0.74
0.87C - 0.76
= 0.20X - 0.55
0.51X + 1.78
0.78C +1.36
SR « 0.06X + 0.99
S * 0.19X + 0.69
X * 0.84C + 0.63
SR - 0.12X + 0.47
S » 0.22X + 0.80
X » 0.85C + 0.39
SR » 0.17X + 0.15
S = 0.24X + 1.S3
X •= 0.76C + 0 03
SR « 0.09X » 0.83
S * 0.19X « 0.79
X - 0.93C - 0.40
SR = 0.08X + 1.52
S » 0.22X + 1.73
X » 0.92C - 0.15
X « MEAN RECOVERY
C * TRUE VALUE FOR THE CONCENTRATION
-------
TABLE 2 (continued)
1.4-DIdfljOROBSMZEKX CIS-l-3-01CMLOSOPK5rEBB 1.1.2,2-TTmaCMLOROCTHftte;
(8.00 - 499.00) (8.00 - 488.00) (8.00 - 499.00)
V»TIR rm
APPUOkBU CONC. RAWC1
CHLOROSSNZDCS
(8.00 - 500.00)
DISTILLED WkTKR
STOLE- ANALYST PRECISION
OVWUU. PRECISION
•ccesACY
TAP MATER
SIB8LE-AMALYST PRECISION
OVSBA1X PRECISION
ACCURACY
SURFACE HSTK*
SIBSLC-A8ALYST PRECISION
OVZRALL PRECISION
AOCS8ACT
MASTS MATER 1
SINGLE-ANALYST PREasiON
OVERALL PRECISION
ACC8BACY
HASTE MATER 2
SINGLE-ANALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
HASTE HATER 3
SINGLE-ANALYST PRECISION
OVERALL PRECISION
ACCURACY
811 • 0.15X • 0.02
S • 0.18X t 1.21
X - l.OOC - 1.23
SB • 0.07X 4 1.71
S • 0.16X 4 1.43
E • l.OOC - 1.39
SR • 0.12X t 1.04
S • 8.1BX » 0.89
X • 0.96C - 0.41
SR « 0.14X 4 63.40
S - 0.33X * 79.41
X « 0.93C 4 13.00
SR « 0.12X 4 0.48
S - 0.21X 4 0.99
X « 0.93C - 1.44
SR - 0.18X * 2.24
S « 0.36X 4 1.23
X • 1.04C 4 1.45
SR • 0.10X - 0.61
S • 0.43X - 1.19
X • 0.96C - 0.28
SR - 0.06X * 0.54
S « 0.26X * 0.21
X • 0.9SC - 0.97
SR • O.OSX 4 0.73
S « 0.19X - 0.16
X • 0.95C 4 0.03
SR - 0.12X 4 0.34
S » 0.39X - 0.16
X « 0.99C - 0.06
S3 - 0.07X » 0.73
S - 0.40X - 0.69
X - 0.96C - 1.10
SR « 0.09X * 0.95
S * 0.37X 4 0.03
X « l.CSC - 2.55
SR - O.liX 4 0.42
8 - O.MX - 0.26
X • 0.59C - 0.90
SR • 0.17X • 0.04
» • 0.34X 4 0.44
X • 0.60C - 1.07
SR - 0.232 4 0.01
S - 0.49X 4 0.26
X • 0.56C - 0.13
SSI - 0.20X 4 1.90
S * 0.4831 4 0.24
X • 0.63C - 0.87
SR • C.20X 4 0.02
S - 0.37X 4 1.77
X • 0.50C 4 0.69
SR • 0.188 4 1.64
S • O.J&X 4 1.09
X - 0.53C 4 1.35
SR - 0.14X 4 2.41
8 • 0.23X 4 2.79
X » 0.9SC 4 0.19
SR • 0.09X 4 1.43
S « 0.21X 4 1.53
X • 0.93C - 0.71
S« " 0.11X 4 1.03
S • O.iW 4 0.44
X • 0.97C - 0.62
SR - 0.198 4 9.29
S « 0.30X 4 3.99
X • 0.84C 4 7.12
ES • 0.1SS 4 0.87
S • 0.30X 4 1.25
X * 0.91C - 0.1S
S» « 0.15X 4 2.33
S « 0.2SX 4 2.63
X - l.OOC 4 0.98
X • IBM R8COVERT
c • THUS mm POK TIB COWCEWTRATIW
-------
The gases are expected to be less precise due to handling problems
associated with both the sample and standard preparations. The
average precision of all analytes in a given water was relatively
independent of water type, ranging from 24% to 29% for the six
water matrices. In all cases, as expected, the highest %RSD (poor-
est precision) occurred at the lowest Youden pair concentration.
The precision is acceptable at all levels when the background in-
terferences are minimal.
The single-analyst standard deviation indicates the precision
associated with a single laboratory. The percent relative stand-
ard deviation for a single analyst (%RSD-SA), averaged overall
the waters, ranged from 10% to 22% for the 27 analytes, while the
average value of %RSD-SA for all analytes in a given water ranged
from 12% to 15%. In all cases, the highest %RSD-SA (poorest pre-
cision) was associated with the lowest Youden pair concentration.
The precision is acceptable at all levels where background inter-
ference is minimal.
Statistical comparisons of the effect of water type were performed
on all amalytes. These indicated a statistical effect of water
matrix on the accuracy or precision of Method 601 in the following
cases:
Carbon tetrachloride in wastewater 1
Chlorobenzene in wastewater 1
1,4-Dichlorobenzene in wastewater 3, and
1,2-Dichloioethane in wastewater 3.
15
-------
SECTION 3
RECOMMENDATIONS
Method 601 is recommended for the analysis of purgeable halocar-
bons in municipal and industrial wastewaters. The accuracy and
precision are acceptable, while the matrix effects are signifi-
cant only at low concentration levels.
Care should be taken in the handling or packing of the chromato-
graphic columns. Any type of mechanical shock may damage the
fragile packing material and produce fines which result in plugged
columns, decreased separation efficiency, and/or a contaminated
detector furnace.
Metal columns are not recommended as they may be adversely affected
by halogen compounds.
The proper size quartz combustion tube should be flamed prior to
installation.
Care must be taken in obtaining laboratory pure ("organic-free")
water. The use of an activated carbon column to purify distilled
water is recommended. The waters should be capped tightly to
prevent contamination from solvent vapors in the laboratory
atmosphere.
The analyst should check the analytical curve for linearity. Sev-
eral laboratories reported non-linearity above 200 ppt.
16
-------
It is recommended that the purity of cis and trans-1,3-dichlo.ro-
propene standard materials be checked. Some laboratories have
observed impurities of 1,2 dichloropropane as a decomposition
product.
Extra care should be observed in the preparation of gaseous stand-
ards due to potential losses of analyte. It is recommended that
at least 10 mg. of standard be weighed for the standard solution
to allow three significant figures in the calculations. Premixed
standards for gases are not recommended due to instability.
17
-------
SECTION 4
DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY
Before initiation of the study, MC performed preliminary studies
of method detection limit in both reagent water and two waste-
waters; analytical curves for individual compounds over a wide
range of concentrations; and stability studies on the ampul solu-
tions used in the study. The objective of thase preliminary stu-
dies was to develop a detailed knowledge of the Method 601 proce-
dure before the 20 participating laboratories began their analyses.
This put MRC in a position to offer assistance to these laborator-
ies if they experienced difficulties during the method study.
SELECTION OF PARTICIPATING LABORATORIES
In June, 1980, MC, as prime contractor, sent requests for quota-
tion (RFQ) to approximately 150 laboratories which had been
identified as potential subcontractors for this interlaboratory
study.
The RFQ contained a Scope of Work, the fixed price allowed for the
effort, a description of the projected timing of the required ana-
lyses, and a copy of the analytical method. A copy of Method 601
is presented in Appendix A of this report. Interested laboratories
were asked to respond to the RFQ describing:
• Facilities available at the laboratory, including all instru-
mentation to be used for the study.
18
-------
• Previous experience in carrying out the types of analyses
specified in the Scope of Work for the ccinpounds of interest.
• Handling procedures for working with hazardous and potentially
hazardous chemicals.
• The organization and managerial structure of the laboratory.
identifying those personnel involved in managing this study.
• The analyst involved in the analyses to be performed, includ-
ing his/her experience.
• Quality control/quality assurance procedures and good labora-
tory practices followed by the laboratory.
Approximately 25 proposals were received in response to the RFQ.
These proposals were ranked and the 20 most qualified laboratories
were selected for participation, Table 3 gives the list of par-
ticipating laboratories for the Method 601 interlaboratory study.
Throughout this report, data provided by these laboratories will
be identified only by an anonymous code number.
19
-------
TABLE 3. PARTICIPATING LABORATORIES
Acurex Corporation
285 Clyde Avenue
Mountain View, CA 94042
Analytics
Division of CBL
Subsidiary of Rohm & Haas Co.
1415 Rhoadmiller
Richmond, VA 23260
Clayton Environmental Consultants, Inc.
25711 Southfield Road
Southfield, MI
Engineering Science, Inc.
Research and Development Laboratory
600 Bancroft Way
Berkeley, CA 94710
Environmental Research Group, Inc.
117 North First
Ann Arbor, KI 48104
ERCO/Energy Research Co., Inc.
185 Alewife Brook Parkway
Cambridge, KA 02138
Global Geochemistry Corp.
6919 Eton Avenue
Canoga Park. CA 91303
Jacobs Laboratories (formerly PJB
Laboratories)
373 South Fair Oaks Avenue
Pasadena, CA 91105
Normandeau Associates, Inc. (formerly
Texas Instruments, Inc.)
1710 Firman Drive
Richardson, TX 75081
Northrop Services, Inc.
Environmental Services
P.O. Box 3437
Little Rock, AR 72203
O'Brien & Gere Engrs., Inc.
Box 4873
1304 Buckley Road
Syracuse, NY 13221
Orlando Laboratories, Inc.
P.O. Box 8008
90 West Jersey Street
Or land, FL, 32806
PEDCo Environmental, Inc.
11499 Chester Road
Cincinnati, OH 45246
SERCO Laboratories
Sanitary Engineering Laboratories, Inc.
1931 West County Road, C2
Roseville, MN 55113
State of New York
Department of Health
Tower Building
The Governor Kelson A. Rockeller
Empire State Plaza
Albany, NY 12201
Technical Services, Inc.
103-7 Stockton Street
P.O. Box 52329
Jacksonville, FL 32201
UBTL, Division of University of Utah
Research Institute
520 Wakara Way
Salt Lake City, UT 84108
Versar, Inc.
6621 Electronic Drive
Springfield, VA 22151
Weston Designers Consultants
Weston Way
West Chester. PA 19380
Wilson Laboratories
Analytical & Research Chemists
Biologists
528 North Ninth
Salina, KS 67401
and
20
-------
PHASE I - ANALYSIS OF PRESTUDY SAMPLES
In November 1980, MC forwarded to each participating laboratory
six sealed glass ampuls containing three mixtures each at two
concentration levels. The higher concentration mixes of these
purgeable halocarbons were to be spiked into reagent water provided
by the laboratories, while the lower concentrations were to be
spiked into a wastev/ater supplied by MRC. Also forwarded were pro-
cedures for the preparation of stock solutions, the preparation of
aqueous calibration standards, and for spiking tap water and waste-
water with the samples contained in the ampuls. These recommended
procedures are presented in Tables 4, 5, and 6. Some notes on
Method 601 were also sent to each participating laboratory and are
presented in Appendix B herein. These notes included specifica-
tions of purge/trap samplers that could be employed, acceptable
chromatographic detectors, and the chromatographic column to be
employed. Also included in the information packet was a list of
some of the suppliers for volatile organic compounds as presented
i£\
in Table 7, and procedures for cleaning a Hall detector cell (see
Table 8).
21
-------
TABLE 4. PROCEDURES FOR PREPARATION OF STOCK SOLUTIONS
1. Place about 9.8 mL of methyl alcohol into a ground-glass stop-
pered 10-mL volumetric flask^
2. Allow the flask to stand unstoppered about 10 minutes or until
all alcohol wetted surfaces have dried.
3. Weigh the flask to the nearest 0.1 rng.
4. Using a 100 |jL syringe, immediately add 2 drops of the refer-
ence standard to the flask, then reweigh. Be sure that the 2
drops fall directly into the alcohol without contacting the
neck of the flask.
5. Dilute to volume, stopper, then mix by inverting the flask
several times.
6. Transfer the solution to a dated and labeled 15 mL screw-cap
bottle with a Teflon cap. liner.
7. Calculate the concentration in micrograms per microliter from
the net gain in weight.
8. Store the solution at 4°C.
NOTE: All standard solutions prepared in methyl alcohol are
stable up to four weeks when stored under these conditions.
They should be discarded after that time has elapsed.
NOTE: Because of the toxicity of the purgeables, it is necessary
to prepare primary dilutions in a hood. It is further re-
commended that a NIOSH/MESA approved toxic gas respirator
be used when the analyst handles high concentrations of
such materials.
22
-------
TABLE 5. PROCEDURES FOR PREPARATION OF
AQUEOUS CALIBRATION STANDARDS
In order to prepare accurate standard solutions, the following
precautions must be observed.
• Do not inject more than 20-|jL of alcoholic standards into 100
mL of organic-free water. Do not inject into organic-free
water solvents that are immiscible such as hexane or methylene
chloride.
• Use a 25-pL Hamilton 702N microsyringe or equivalent. (Varia-
tions in needle geometry will adversely affect the ability to
deliver reproducible volumes of rnethanolic standards into
water. )
• Rapidly inject the alcoholic standard into the expanded area
of the filled volumetric flask. Remove the needle as fast as
possible after injection.
• Mix aqueous standards by inverting the flask three times only.
• Never use pipets to dilute or transfer samples or aqueous
standards.
• Aqueous standards when stored with a headspace are not stable
and should be discarded after one hour.
23
-------
TABLE 6. PROCEDURES FOR SPIKING WATER
If duplicate analyses are to be performed on one ampul, concur-
rently perform all the steps below in duplicate.
• Fill a 10Q-:nL volumetric flask to volume with organic-free
water.
• Stabilize the ampuls to 20°C.
• Use a 25 pL Hamilton 702N microsyringe or equivalent. - (Varia-
tions in needle geometry will adversely affect the ability to
deliver reproducible volumes of methanolic standards into
water.)
• Open the ampuls by breaking the top cff at the break area on
the neck and immediately fill the syringe.
• Rapidly inject 20 pL of the ampul concentrate into the expand-
ed area of the filled volumetric flask. Remove the needle as
fast as possible afuer injection.
• Mix the sample by inverting the flask three times only,
• Never use pipets to dilute or transfer samples or aqueous
standards.
• Aqueous standards when stored with a headspace are not stable
and should be discarded after one hour.
24
-------
TABLE 7. LIST OF SUPPLIERS FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Chemical
Bromodichlorome thane
Bromoform
Bromome thane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Dibromochlorome thane
] , 2-Dichlorobenzene
1 , 3-Dichlorobenzene
1 , 4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodifluorome thane
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
1 , 2-Dichloroethane
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
tranc-1 , 2-Dichloroethene
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
trans-1 , 3-Dichlorpropene
Methylene chloride
1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
1,1, 2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluorome thane
Vinyl chloride
Suppliers3
1,
1,
4,
1,
1,
2,
1,
1,
4,
1/
1,
1,
1,
4,
I,
1,
1
2,
1,
6
6
1,
i;
1,
1,
1,
1,
4
••
3
2,
5
2,
2,
3,
3
2,
5
3
2,
2
2,
5
3
2,
3
2,
2,
2,
2,
3
2,
3
3
3
4, 5
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
aKey to suppliers:
1 = Aldrich Chemical Company
2 = Fisher Scientific
3 = Chem Services
4 = Matheson Gas
5 = Linde Gas
6 = Columbia Organic Chemicals.
No known supplier found.
25
-------
TABLE 8. MAINTENANCE PROCEDURE FOR HALL 700 DETECTOR
1. Clean Cell
a. Sonicate disassembled cell components in 25-33% H3P04 for
10 minutes in 100-mL beaker.
b. Rinse three times with distilled water.
c. Sonicate with 75 mL distilled water for 5 minutes.
d. Sonicate with dilute HCl (1-2%) for 10 minutes.
e. Rinse three times with n-propanol.
f. Sonicate in 50-75 mL n-propanol for 5 minutes.
g. Pour off n-propanol and drain cell components on Kim-Wipes
h. Reassemble cell wet and install.
2. Clean 1/4" •* 1/1§" stainless steel union connecting quartz
tube with Teflon transfer line. Use same procedure and
clean along with cell.
©i
3. Clean Teflon transfer line between quartz tube and cell by
flushing with concentrated HCl using Pasteur pipette. Con-
nect to stainless steel union and blow out with effluent
gases for 3-4 minutes before attaching to cell.
4. Quartz combustion tubes should be conditioned before use:
i
a. Soak in aqua regia for 24-48 hours. Pour off.
b. Soak in dilute (^1%) HCl for 2 hours.
c. Air dry.
(continued)
26
-------
TABLE 8 (continued)
d. Heat to red hot from center out with Fisher burner.
e. Cool and install in furnace, being careful not to scratch
inner surface of tube.
NOTE: The torching alone produces -^90% of the improvement
in tube performance.
Solvent - use 100% n-propanol with 50% each #77 and #150
resin. Be sure glass wool is unsilanized. Flush resin with
150 mL n-propanol to remove methanol from slurry.
Assembly of quartz tube:
a. Use 1/4" or 6 mm Vespel ferrules to prevent later
development, of leaks.
b. After seating ends of tube into fittings,~pull out
1/6" - 1/8" before torquing down. Vespel ferrules
tend to pull the tube towards the fitting and this
will prevent the tube from breaking.
c. Teflon tube should extend about 1/4" into 1/4" section
of the 1/4" -» 1/6" union.
27
-------
PHASE II - PRESTUDY CONFERENCE
After the participating laboratories analyzed the prestudy confer-
ence samples, the analysts from the 20 participating laboratories
met at EMSL-Cincinnati on January 15, 1981 to discuss Method 601
procedure and potential problems. Potential problems identified
at this meeting are summarized below.
• The most common comment about Method 601 was the difficulty
in obtaining an "organic-free" blank (distilled water). Two
methods were suggested:
- Boil the distilled water, cap tightly, and us^ immediately
- Run distilled water through an activated carbon column. Cap
tightly and use immediately.
• Reductions in column flow during the course of an analysis
indicated that the chromatographic column needed to be re-
packed. The packing material for Method 601 is very fragile
and easily damaged, giving less than optimal results.
• Metal columns have exhibited some adverse characteristics
with halogenated compounds. Their use is not recommended.
• Several laboratories reported problems preparing gaseous
analytical standards. Cooling the solvents in dry ice
will aid in preparation of these standards.
• A number of laboratories inquired about MRC supplying the par-
ticipating laboratories with stock standard mixes for the
method study (Phase III). Since this would eliminate a valid
bias from the study, it was decided that all laboratories
should prepare the Method 601 standard mixes from neat
materials.
28
-------
• Difficulties were reported in trying to maintain the oven
temperature of non-cryogenic gas chromatographs at 50°C
during the initial portion of the cbromatographic run.
• Some laboratories reported better results with Vespel
ferrules than with graphite ferrules.
• Two similar sizes of combustion tubes were available. In some
cases it might be necessary to check the diameter of the tube
to assure that the proper size was used. The quartz tubes
must be flamed before installation.
PHASE III - INTERLABORATORY METHOD STUDY
The method study samples were sent to the participating labora-
tories in March 1981. The design of the method interlaboratory
study was based on Youden's original non-replicate design [1] for
collaborative evaluation of precision and accuracy for analytical
methods. According to Youden's design, two similar yet different
samples are analyzed in pairs. The analyst is directed to do a
single analysis and report one value for each sample.
Six spiking solutions were prepared for each of the three mixes,
resulting in three different concentration ranges for each of the
purgeable halocarbons. Each concentration range was represented
by two solutions (a Youden pair). The low level concentration
after spiking in water matrix was designed to approximate very low
levels of the halocarbons (8 to 10 pg/L). The intermediate concen-
tration range was 80-100 pg/L. The highest concentration range was
to be a factor 8 to 10 times the middle concentration. Table 9
shows the calculated concentration of individual halocarbon for
each ampul after spiking by the required procedure in a water ma-
trix.
29
-------
TABLE 9.
CONCENTRATIONS OF METHOD 601
PARAMETERS IN SPIKED SOLUTIONS
Ampul
Parameter
Nix #1
Trichlorofluorome thane
Chlorome thane
Vinyl chloride
trans-1 , 2-Dichloroethene
1 , 1 . 1-Trichlorog thane
Trichloroethene
Dibromochloromethane A
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
Tetrachloroethene
1 , 2-Dichlorobenzene
Mix #2
Bromome thane
Chlorome thane
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
Carbon tetrachloride
trans-1, 3-Dichloropropene
1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroe thane
Bromoform
Chlorobenzene ^
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
Mix «3
Methylene chloride
1,1-Dichloroe thane
1 ,2-Dichloroe thane
Bromodichlorome thane
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1 , 3-Dichlorobenzene
A
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
B
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
c
40
40
40
40
40
80
80
80
30
80
80
40
40
40
40
80
80
30
80
80
40
40
40
40
80
80
80
80
D
50
50
50
50
50
100
102
100
100
100
100
50
50
50
50
100
100
101
100
100
50
50
50
50
100
100
100
100
E
400
399
401
400
399
399
400
-
399
399
398
399
400
400
399
400
401
399
400
-
401
400
399
394
400
400
400
399
F
499
499
500
500
500
501
488
-
500
501
499
498
493
501
501
488
499
500
500
-
501
499
500
501
499
488
499
500
K
Further discussion of these compounds are presented in Section
30
-------
Verification of the ampul concentrations was performed by both MRC
and the Quality Assurance Branch of EMSL-Cincinnati. MRC employ-
ing Method 601 performed zero day analyses on all ampul concentra-
tions and six month stability on one low concentration and one
high concentration. QAB analyzed only those compounds which were
not verified by MRC as stable employing direct injection GC-MS.
See the discussion section for more details.
Instructions to participating laboratories for the analysis of the
halocarbons in the six water matrices included the procedures for
preparation of stock solutions, preparation of calibration stand-
ards and preparation of quality control samples that had been
recommended for the prestudy conference analysis (see Table 6
through 8). In addition each laboratory was instructed to perform
their analyses in the following manner:
1. A total of 114 analyses (108 spiked samples and six water
blanks) are to be performed by each participating laboratory.
2. The six water types to be used in the study are:
(1) distilled water from your laboratory,
(2) tap water from your laboratory,
(3) a surface water collected by you from a location
near your laboratory,
(4) three industrial wastewaters supplied by MRC.
3. Each laboratory will receive 19 individual bottles of each
of the three wastewaters. Use one bottle for each ampul and
one bottle for the blank analysis.
31
-------
4. Follow "Recommended Procedure for Preparation of Halogenated
Purg*:able Quality Control Samples" for spiking waters with
contents of the ampuls.
5. For each of the six types of waters listed above, spike 100 mL
of water with 20 \tL of each of the following ampuls:
601 Mix
Cone . 1
601 Mix
Cone . 4
601 Mix
Cone . 1
601 Mix
Cone . 4
601 Mix
Cone . 1
601 Mix
Cone. 4
#1
#1
#2
#2
#3
#3
601 Mix
Cone. 2
601 Mix
Cone . 5
601 Mix
Cone. 2
601 Mix
Cone . S
601 Mix
Cone . 2
601 Mix
Cone . 5
#1
#1
#2
#2
#3
#3
601 Mix
Cone . 3
601 Mix
Cone . 6
601 Mix
Cone . 3
601 Mix
Cone . 6
601 Mix
Cone . 3
601 Mix
Cone . 6
#1
#1
#2
#2
#3
#3
In addition, analyze one blank. It is not necessary to
analyze ore blank per mix. F^r each wastewater you have been
supplied with only one bottle for blank analyses.
Report results on the forms provided in pg/liter of the
spiked water sample (or blank) using the following signifi-
cant figure format:
XXX
XX.X
x.xx
o.xx
32
-------
The results from the 20 participating laboratories for analysis of
the 28 haiocarbons in the six water matrices are tabulated in Ap-
pendix C. All values shown are corrected for the blank values.
33
-------
SECTION 5
STATISTICAL TREATMENT OF DATA
Data obtained from the interlaboratory study were subjected to
statistical analyses by the Battelle Columbus Laboratories, Colum-
bus, Ohio, under EPA Contract 68-03-2624. The analyses were per-
formed employing U.S. EPA's Interlaboratory Method Validation Study
(IMVS) system [2] of computer programs. This system of programs
was designed to implement ASTM procedure D2777, "Standard Practice
for Determination of Precision and Bias of Methods of Committee
D-19 on Water" [3]. The analyseo conducted using the IMVS system
included tests for the rejection of outliers (both whole labora-
tories for a water-type and individual data points), estimation of
mean recovery (accuracy), estimation of single-analyst and overall
precision, and tests for the effects of water type on accuracy and
precision.
REJECTION OF OUTLIERS
An outlying observation, or "outlier," is a data point that appears
to deviate markedly from other members of the sample in which it
occurs. Outlying data points are commonly encountered during in-
terlaboratory test programs. If they are not removed, they can
distort the accuracy and precision statistics which characterize
the analytical method. These outlying points cannot be removed
indiscriminantly, however, because they may represent an extreme
manifestation of the random variability inherent in the method.
34
-------
ASTM procedure E178-80, "Standard Practice for Dealing with
Outlying Observations" [4], and ASTM procedure 02777-77 [3]
present explicit statistical rules and methods for identifi-
cation of outliers.
Data from outlying laboratories for a particular water type were
rejected employing Youden's laboratory ranking test procedure [3,
5] at the 5% level of significance. Data remaining after the
laboratory ranking procedure were subjected to individual outlier
tests. After zero, missing, "less than," and "nondetect" data
were rejected «?s outliers, the average and standard deviation for
remaining data were calculated. The data then were examined for
additional outliers employing the two-sided Thompson's T-test for
outlier rejection [6]. Data rejected as outliers for this study
are identified by an asterisk in the tables of raw data shown in
Appendix D.
Youden's Laboratory Ranking Procedure
Using the data for each water type, Youden's laboratory ranking
test [3, 5] was performed at the 5% level of significance. The
Youden laboratory ranking procedure requires a complete set of
data from each laboratory within each water type. Missing data
from laboratory "i" for water type "j" were replaced by the follow-
ing procedure. Letting X-.u denote the reported measurement from
IjK
laboratory "i" for water type "j" and concentration level C^, it
is assumed that
Xijk = Pj ' CkVj ' Li ' cijk (1)
where p. and y• are fixed parameters which determine the effect of
water type j; L- is the systematic error due to laboratory "i",
and C. is the random within-laboratory error.
35
-------
Taking natural logarithms, it follows that
Hn Xijk = -en Pj + t . £n C, + £n 4 + £n e (2,
which is a linear regression model with dependent variable £n X
and independent variable 2n C. . (Details and justification for
this model are discussed in the section "Comparison of Accuracy
and Precision Across Water Types.'1)
The natural logarithms of the individual laboratory's data were
regressed against the natural logarithms of the true concentra-
tion levels for the sir ampuls in each water type. The predicted
values for £n~X> . . were obtained from the regression equation, and
1}X
the missing values for X^.^, were estimated by X — ^ = exp(£n~X^ • ^) .
(For complete details of this procedure, see Reference 2.)
An example of the use of Youden's laboratory ranking procedure
is presented in Table 10, where the rankings of the values for
chloromethane in water 6 are listed for each laboratory and for
ampuls 1 through 6. For 20 laboratories and six ampuls, the upper
and lower critical limits of the sums of the rankings are 104
and 22. If the sum of the rankings of any laboratory equals or
exceeds 104 or is equal or less than 22 that laboratory's data
are rejected for all determinaitons for that analyte (chloro-
methane) in that water (water 6). From Table 10, is is apparent
that the data from laboratories 6, 11, 15, and 17 must be
rejected. The estimated missing data were then removed from the
data sets.
Test for Individual Outliers
The data remaining after rejection of zero, missincv "less than,"
and "nondetect" data were subjected to an individual outlier test
based on calculation of Thompson's T-value.
36
-------
TABLE 10. YOUDEN LABORATORY RANKING PROCEDURE
FOR CHLOROMETHA.ME DATA 7N WATER 6
1 ' - ' • '' '" ' •- • '~- "• — — — —
Labor-
atory
number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Ampul 1
7
12
3
14
S
17.5
11
17.5
9
13
4
6
17.5
10
1
2
17.5
17.5
8
17.5
Ampul 2
14
15
7
13
4
IS
9.5
16
11
8
6
5
2
12
1
3
19
19
9.5
17
Ranking
Ampul 3
8
13
17
10
4
19
9
15
7
6
2
16
4
5
1
3
19
19
11
12
values
Ampul 4
4
14
18
12
10
]9.5
7
16
6
9
3
11
8
5
1
2
19.5
17
15
13
Ampul 5
13
15
14
11
17
19.5
6
7
3.5
1
3.5
13
5
10
2
9
19.5
8
16
12
Ampul 6
5
18
15
11
17
19.5
7
13
4
1
3
10
12
6
2
14
19.5
8
16
9
Cumulative
score
51.0
87.0
74.0
71.0
57.0
144. O3
49.5
84.5
40.5
38.0
21, 5a
66.0
58.5
48.0
e.oa
33.0
114. Oa
88.5
75.5
80.5
laboratories rejected versus upper and lower criteria of 104 and 22.
The criterion for rejection of individual outliers is based on
calculation of the T-value [3,6].
In these calculations the mean recovery, x, is given by
n
X =
(3)
and the standard deviations, s, is given by
Vn
^i?!
(xi-x)2
(4)
37
-------
where x • - individual analyses
n - nv'mber of retained analyses
values in the ampul set
Thompson's T is defined by
x - x.
where x is the retained x value farthest away from the mean (x)
e i
of the set of retained values.
The outlier may be rejected if the value of T calculated exceeds
the critical value for T (two-sided test) as presented in Table
11. The 5% significance level was employed. If the extreme value
is rejected as an outlier, the test is repeated for the next ex-
treme value among the data until the value being tested is less
than the critical T-value.
TABLE 11. CRITICAL VALUES FOR THOMPSON'S T (TWO-
SIDE TEST) WHEN STANDARD DEVIATION IS
CALCULATED FROM THE SAME SAMPLES
Number of 5%
observations, significance
n level
6
7
6
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
1,89
2.02
2.13
2.21
2.29
2.36
2.41
2.46
2.51
2.55
2.58
2.62
2.65
2.68
2.71
38
-------
Table 12 summarizes calculations to examine suspect data points
for chloromethane in water 6 by the T-test outliers.
TABLE 12. RESULTS OF TEST FOR INDIVIDUAL OUTLIERS
(CHLOROMETHANE IN WATER 6)
Ampul
3
4
5
6
Lab
16
16
10
10
Ex-
treme
Value
xe
91.0
127.0
1150
1910
Calculated T
Mean
(x)
29.5
43.5
355
512
Standard
deviation
(s)
23.7
28.7
234
389
_
x -x
e
(s)
2
2
3
3
.60
.91
.40
.60
Number
of
points
n
15
16
16
16
Critical T
T
2.
2.
2.
2.
c
55
58
58
58
Decision
Reject
Reject
Reject
Reject
As shown in Table 12, four additional data points are identified
as outliers by the Thompson's T-test for the illustrative example
of the analyte chloromethane in water 6. In summary, of the
original 120 data points for chloromethane in water 6 (20 labora-
tories x six ampuls), all data points for laboratories 6, 11, 15,
and 17 were rejected on the basis of Youden's laboratory ranking
procedure (total of 24 points), and four additional data points
were found to be outliers based on the T-test (for a total of the
28 data points that are identified by an asterisk as outliers in
Table 19). These same tests were applied for all other analytes
in all six waters.
STATISTICAL SUMMARIES
After the outlier rejection tests were performed, the following
summary statistics were calculated employing the remaining data
for each ampul (single analyte, single concentration, single water
matrix):
• Number of retained data points, n
• Mean recovery of retained data, X
39
-------
• Accuracy as a percent of relative error, % RE
• Overall absolute standard deviation, S
• Percent relative overall standard deviation, % RSD
• Absolute single-analyst standard deviation, SR
• Percent relative single-analyst standard deviation,
% RSD-SA
All of these statistics, except the single-analyst absolute and
relative standard deviations, were calculated using the retained
data for each ampul. The basic statistical formulas used for
these calculations are given below, where %i , X2 , . . . , X denote
the values for the n retained data points for a given ampul.
Mean Recovery (X):
n
5 Xi
Accuracy as a % Relative Error
7 RE = * - true value
/0 **• true value x
Overall Standard Deviation:
s =
and
Percent Relative Overall Standard Deviation:
% RSD = x 100 (7)
40
-------
The overall standard deviation, S, indicates the precision
associated with measurements generated by a group of laboratories.
This represents the broad variation in the data collected in a
collaborative study. A measure of how well an individual analyst
can expect to perform in his own laboratory is another important
measure of precision. This single-analyst precision, denoted by
SR, is measured by
SR
where m = number of retained Youden-paired observations
th
D^ = difference between observations in the i * pair
D = average of D- values
The Youden-pair design employed in this study permits the calcula-
tion of this single-analyst precision without making duplicate
measurements on the same sample. This helps to avoid the well-
intentioned manipulation of data that can occur when laboratories
make duplicate analyses.
The percent relative standard deviation for the single-analyst
precision is calculated by
SR
% RSD-SA = — x 100 (9)
X*
where X* is the average of the two mean recoveries corresponding
to the two ampuls defining the particular Youden pair. These sum-
mary statistics are presented in Appendix D for each of the 21
halocarbons in the six water matrices.
41
-------
REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF BASIC STATISTICS
Systematic relationships frequently exist between the mean recovery
statistics and the true concentration levels across ampuls, and be-
tween the precision statistics and the mean recovery statistics.
Given a plot of precision values versus concentration levels, a
smooth curve drawn through the points can show that the precision
is found to (1) be constant and not vary with level, (2) vary
directly with level in a linear manner, or (3) vary with level in
a curvilinear fashion.
To derive statements for method accuracy and precision, the basic
statistics were regressed assuming linear relationships, fitting
the data to a line using weighted least-squares. The weights were
chosen to be inversely related to the true concentration in the
case of accuracy and inversely related to the mean recovery in the
case of precision. The inverse weightings were employed to mini-
mize skewing created by the high Youden-pair data. The results of
the regression analyses are discussed below.
Statements of Method Accuracy
The accuracy is characterized by comparing the mean recovery of
the analyte, X, to the true concentration level of the compound,
C, in the spiked solution. The IMVS program conducts these calcu-
lations via matrix algebra, where weighted least-squares linear
regression of X versus C is conducted with weights chosen to be
inversely related to the square of the true concentration levels
(see page 108 of Reference 2 for details). This method is equiva-
lent to that suggested by Britton [7] where the linear regression
for X versus C is achieved by using the customary least-squares
algorithm to fit:
(*)
(10)
42
-------
which can then be converted to the desired relationships by
multiplying through by C, giving:
X = aC + b (11)
If the intercept (b) associated with the fitted line is negligible
(i.e., essentially zero), then the slope (a) provides a unique
value which represents the percent recovery over all the concen-
tration levels.
Statements of Method Precision
The precision of Method 601 is characterized by comparing the
overall and single-analyst standard deviations to the mean
recovery, X. The IMVS program conducts these calculations via
matrix algebra, where a weighted least-squares linear regression
of S and SR versus X is conducted with weights chosen to be
inversely proportional to the square of the mean recovery (see
Reference 2, page 108 for details). This method is equivalent to
that suggested by Britton [7] where the linear regressions for S
and SR versus C ara achieved by using the customary least squares
procedure to fit the equations,
(*)
§ = c + d [i] (12)
In this study, however, the regression was conducted versus X as
follows:
(I)
£ = C + df il (13)
which is then converted by multiplying through by X to yield the
linear relationships
S = aX + b (14)
and
SR = cX + d (15)
43
-------
These equations are also presented in Tables 1-2.
If the intercepts (b) and (d) are negligible, then the slopes (a)
and (c) are good approximations to the overall and single-analyst
percent relative standard deviations, respectively. These, in
turn, are measures of the method precision.
COMPARISON OF ACCURACY AND PRECISION ACROSS WATER TYPES
It is possible that the accuracy and precision of Method 601
depend upon the type of water being analyzed. The summary statis-
tics X, S, and SR are calculated separately for each concentration
level within each water type. They can be compared across water
types in order to obtain information about the effects of water
type on accuracy and precision. However, the use of these summary
statistics in this manner has several disadvantages. First, it is
cumbersome since there are 36 irean recovery statistics (X) (six
ampuls x six waters), 36 precision statistics (S), and 18 precision
statistics (SR) calculated for each compound. Comparison of these
statistics across concentration levels and across water types
becomes unwieldy. Second, the statistical properties of this type
of comparison procedure are difficult to determine. Finally, due
to variation associated with X, S, and SR, comparisons based on
these statistics can lead to inconsistent conclusions about the
effect of water type. For example, distilled water may produce a
significantly lower value than drinking water for the precision
statistic S at a high concentration, but a significantly higher
value for S at a low concentration.
An alternative approach, described in detail in Reference 2, has
been developed to test for the effects of water type. This
alternative approach is based on the concept of summarizing the
average effect of water type across concentration levels rather
than studying the local effects at each concentration level. If
44
-------
significant differences are established by this alternative tech-
nique, then the summary statistics can be used for further local
analysis.
The test for the effect of water type is based on the following
statistical model. If X^-^ denotes the measurement reported by
laboratory "i," for water type "j," and ampul "k," then
where i = 1,2,..., n
j = 1,2,..., 6
k = 1,2,..., 6
Model components p• and y. are fixed parameters that determine the
effect of water type "j" on the behavior of the observed measure-
ments (X -j^). The parameter C^ is the true concentration level
associated with ampul "k." The model component L- is a random
factor which accounts for the systematic error associated with
laboratory "i." The model component t-.. is the random factor
IJK
that accounts for the within-laboratory error.
The model is designed to approximate the global behavior of the
data. The multiplicative structure was chosen because of two
important properties. First, it allows for a possible curvilinear
relationship between the data (X-•.) and the true concentration
i JK
level (C. ) through the use of the exponent Y- °n cj,- This makes
the model more flexible in comparison to straight-line models.
Second, as will be noted below, an inherent increasing relation-
ship exists between the variability in the data and the concen-
tration level C. in this model. This property is important
because it is typical of interlaboratory data collected under
conditions where the true concentration levels vary widely.
45
-------
Accuracy is related directly to the mean recovery or expected
value of the measurements (X- -. ). The expected value for the
data modeled by Equation 1 is
E = Pj * CkYj ' E
Precision is related to the variability in the measurements (
The variance of the data modeled by Equation 1 is
Var(Xijk) «p. - C Var(L - s), (17)
which is an increasing function of C. . (See Reference 2 for a
complete discussion of this model.)
The accuracy and precision of Method 601 depend upon water type
through Equations 16 and 17 and the parameters p. and Y-J- If P-;
and Y-J vary with "j" (i.e., vary across water type), then the
accuracy and precision of the method also vary across water type.
To determine if these parameters do vary across water type and to
compare their values, they must be estimated from the laboratory
data using regression techniques. Equation 1 represents the basic
model. However, taking natural logarithms of both sides of Equa-
tion 1, the following straight line regression model is obtained.
£n Xijk = in Pj + Yj in Ck + An 1^ + in e (2)
The parameter £n p . is the intercept, and Y^ is the slope of the
regression line associated with water type "j." It is assumed that
in L. is normally distributed with mean 0 and variance o.2, that
•*• LI
in e is normally distributed with mean O and variance o 2, and
that the £n Li and In e^jk terms are independent.
46
-------
Based on Equation 2, the comparison of water types reduces to the
comparison of straight lines. Distilled water is viewed as a
control, and each of the remaining lines is compared directly to
the line for distilled water.
Using the data on the log-log scale and regression techniques, the
parameter £n p. (and hence p.) and Y can be estimated. These
estimates are then used to test the null hypothesis that there is
no effect due to water type. The formal null and alternative
hypothesis, HQ and HA/ respectively are given by:
HQ: £n p. - An pj = 0 and y. - ^ = 0 for j = 2 (18)
H-: Zn p. - £n p, ? 0 and/or y. - y. i 0 for some j = 2 (19)
A J i. }1
The null hypothesis (HQ) is tested against the alternative hypoth-
esis (H..) using an F-statistic. The probability of obtaining the
value of an F-statistic as large as the value which was actually
observed, Prob(F > F OBS), is calculated under the assumption that
HQ is true. HQ is rejected in favor of H, if Prob(F > F OBS) is
less than 0.05.
If HO is not rejected, then there is no evidence in the data that
the p. vary with "j" or that the y. vary with "j." Therefore,
there is no evidence of an effect due to water type on the accu-
racy or precision of the method. If HQ is rejected, then some
linear combination of the differences (£n p- - £n p) and (Y.J - Y^)
is statistically different from zero. However, this does not
guarantee there will be a statistically significant direct effect
attributable to any specific water type since the overal F test can
be overly sensitive to minor systematic effects common to several
water types. The effect due to water type is judged to be statis-
tically significant only if one of the differences, (£n pj - in p^
and/or (y. - i^), is statistically different from zero. This is
determined by checking the simultaneous 95% confidence intervals
47
-------
which are constructed for each of these differences. Each true
difference can be stated to lie within its respective confidence
interval with 95% confidence. If zero is contained within the con-
fidence interval, then there is no evidence that the corresponding
difference is significantly different from zero.
If at least one of the confidence intervals for the differences
(in p. - in p, ) or (Y• - YI ) fails to include zero, then the stat-
istical significance of the effect due to water type has been
established. However, establishment of a statistically signifi-
cant effect due to water type does not necessarily mean that the
effect is of practical importance. Practical importance is
related to the size and interpretation of the differences.
The interpretation of the differences involves comparing the mean
recovery and standard deviation for each water type to the mean
recovery and standard deviation obtained for distilled water.
These comparisons are made on a relative basis. The mean recovery
for water type "j," given by Equation 16, is compared to that for
distilled water (j = 1) on a relative basis by
_ Pj CkYj E
-------
which depends on the true concentration level (i.e., the concen-
tration dependent bias), If (Y - YI) is zero, then the relative
difference in mean recovery is p./p,, which is independent of con-
centration level C^. Then the mean recovery of water type "j" is
P-/P-. x 100 percent of the mean recovery for distilled water. If
(YT ~ Yi ) is not zero, then the mean recovery of water type "j"
[Y • ~ Y 1
is ( [pj/P-^'Ck J 1 ) x 100 percent of that for distilled
water, and therefore depends on the true concentration level C. .
l\
To illustrate these points, consider the following example. Sup-
pose that a significant F-value has been obtained, and the confid-
ence intervals for all of the differences contain zero except for
water type 5. For water type 5, the point estimate for (£n P5 -
in p,) is -0.38, and the confidence interval for (£n P5 - £n p,)
is (-0.69, -0.07). The point estimate for (YS - Y-, ) is -0.07, and
the confidence interval for (YC - YT) is (-0.04, 0.18). In this
case, a statistically significant effect due to water type has
been established that involves only water type 5. The practical
significance of this effect is judged by considering Equation 20.
The ratio of mean recoveries for water type 5 and distilled water
is given by
E(Xi5k> ** " YI>
and the ratio of the standard deviations is given by
/VirTx^J f (^ - Yl)
Vvar,XUk) - 5^k (2J>
Because the confidence interval for (v5 - Y^) contains zero, this
difference is assumed to be insignificant and is set to zero.
49
-------
Therefore, Equations 21 and 22 reduce to pri/p,. The point estimate
for (£n p,- - £n £•,) was -0.36, Therefore, the point estimate for
PC/PI is 0.68, and the mean recovery for water type 5 is estimated
to be 68% of the mean recovery for distilled water. Similarly,
the standard deviation for the data for water type 5 is estimated
to be 68% of the standard deviation for distilled water. Since
the 95% confidence interval for (£n P5 - in f^) was (-0.69, -0.07),
any value in the interval (0.50, 0.93) is a re?sonable estimate for
Pc/Pjf and the mean recovery (standard deviation) for water type 5
can be claimed to be from 50% to 93% of the mean recovery (standard
deviation) for distilled water. The practical significance of the
effect due to water type ? would depend on the importance of a mean
recovery (standard deviation) that is between 50% and 93% of the
mean recovery (standard deviation) observed for distilled water.
The comparison of accuracy and precision across water types just
discussed is based on the assumption that Equation 1 approximately
models the data. It is clear that in practical monitoring programs
of this type that such models cannot model the data completely in
every case. This analysis therefore is viewed as a screening pro-
cedure which identifies those cases where differences in water
types are likely to be present. A more detailed local analysis
can then be pursued using the basic summary statistics for preci-
sion and accuracy.
For a complete discussion of the statistical model and the analyses
associated with the test for the effect of water types, see pages
A-l through A-17 of Reference 2. Results of the accuracy and pre-
cision comparison among the waters in the study are presented in
Appendix E.
50
-------
SECTION 6
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The objective of this study was to characterize the performance of
Method 601 in terms of accuracy, overalJ precision, single-analyst
precision, and the effect of water type on accuracy and precision.
One measure of the performance of the method is that 17% of the
20,160 data points were rejected as outliers.
ACCURACY
The accuracy is obtained by comparing the mean recovery, x, to the
true values of concentration in pg/L. In Appendix E, individual
values of accuracy as percent relative error are listed for each
analyte, in each water matrix, and at each of the six concentration
levels in that water matrix (three Youden pairs). This results in
1008 separate values for accuracy The linear regression of mean
recovery, x, versus true concentration level, c, provides values
representing the percent recovery over all the concentration lev-
els. This reduces the separate values for accuracy to 168; one
value for each of 28 analytes in each of six waters. Table 13
presents the percent recovery for each compound in water types as
measured by the slopes of the linear regression equations for re-
covery presented earlier in Tables 1-2.
51
-------
TABLE 13. PERCENT RECOVERY STATISTICS
Mix
number
1
2
Compound
Trichlorofluorome thane
Chlorome thane
Vinyl chloride
trans-1 , 2-Dichloroethene
1,1, 1-Trichloroe thane
Trichloroethene
Dibromochlorome thane
Tetrachloroethene
1 , 2-Dichlorobenzene
Bromome thane
Chloroe thane
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
Carbon tetrachloride
trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
1,1, 2-Trichloroe thane
Bromoform
Chlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
Distilled
water
89
77
97
97
90
132
94
94
93
76
99
98
93
98
74
86
96
100
70
Tap
water
92
91
106
98
92
140
98
96
91
lOo
108
103
90
100
69
84
102
100
81
Slope
Surface
water
96
99
112
103
94
146
94
97
90
91
111
98
95
95
75
85
103
98
84
of regression equation
Wastewater
1
96
94
113
102
94
135
93
85
89
79
101
93
90
92
72
78
91
93
82
Wastewater
2
92
81
108
100
92
141
95
96
91
82
110
105
95
95
85
93
97
93
80
Wastewater
3
96
70
114
103
111
140
98
96
91
69
109
102
95
102
78
92
101
104
94
Average
of all
waters
94
85
103
101
96
139
95
94
91
83
107
100
93
9"/
V6
86
93
98
[>4
(continued)
-------
TABLE 13 (continued)
in
to
Mix
number
3
Compound
Methylene chloride
1 , 1-Dichloroe thane
1 ,2-Dichloroe thane
Bromodichlorome thane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroe thane
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
Average of all analytes
Distilled
water
91
95
104
112
102
59
95
95
93
Tap
water
97
93
103
100
98
60
92
91
95
Slope
Surface
water
99
97
101
112
91
56
97
98
97
of regression equation
Wastewater
1
100
98
86
109
87
61
84
(93)
94
92
Wastewater
2
98
96
97
109
104
50
91
92
95
Wastewater
3
95
95
39
104
110
53
100
93
95
Average
of all
waters
97
96
88
108
99
56
93
94
95
From Tables 1 for accuracy.
-------
The validity of using the slope to estimate the percent recovery
depends upon a negligible magnitude for the intercept of the lin-
ear regression equation. An examination of the regression equa-
tions shows five instances where the intercept for the mean re-
covery exceeds the value of 5: Intercept 50 for 1,2-dichloro-
ethane in wastewater 3; Intercept 16.3 for 1,2-dichloroethane in
wastewater 1; Intercept 10.0 for chlorobenzene in wastewater 1;
Intercept 7.1 for 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane in wastewater 1; and
Intercept 6.4 for chloromethane in wastewater 3.
An examination of the statistical summaries of 1,2 dichloroethane
indicates very high recoveries of the lowest Youden pairs (waste-
water 3; 666% and 561%: wastwater 1; 263% and 156%). These large
values can be attributed to the high background levels (waste-
water 3; avg. of 636 ppb: wastewater 1; avg. of 147 ppb) which
contribute to the wide variability of the percent recovery when
the measured values are corrected for the blank values. If the
two lowest concentrations was excluded from the calculations be-
cause the lowest Youden pair concentration was too low in compari-
son to the background the average recoveries for wastewaters 3 and
1 would be 95% and 98% respectively. See revised equations in
Table 2.
An examination of the blank values for chlorobenzene in waste-
waters 1 indicates an extremely high background of 1823 ppb. This
high background affected analyses of all the Youden pairs. (low
Youden pair 1275% and 1502%; middle Youden pair 212% and 252%;
high Youden pair 88% and 67%) An examination of the other waters
at all concentrations indicates that wastewater 1 produced unrea-
sonable results; hence the regression equations are invalid.
The background level of 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane in wastewater 1
averaged 110 ppb. The percent recoveries of the lowest Youden
54
-------
pair (8 and 10 ppb) were 233% and 81%. Deleting the lowest Youden
pair from the calculations because the background was too high
yielded an average recovery of 91%.
The background level of chloromethane is wastewater 3 was low with
an average of only 17 ppb. The percent recoveries from the bias
of the statistical summaries for the six concentrations were 129%;
167%; 63%; 76%; 75% and 84%. The large variation in recoveries
are probably due to the handling problems associated with a gas.
The handling problems are also evident in the poor precision seen
in the regression equations.
Inspecting the average percent recoveries for each compound across
all water types is another means of interpreting the data. Low
recoveries were noted for chloromethane; bromomethane; cis and
trans 1,3-dichloropropene; 1,2-dichloroethane; 1,1,2-trichloro-
ethane and 1,4-dichlorobenzene. High recoveries were noted for
trichloroethane.
The low recoveries for chloromethane across all water types indi-
cate a problem with the handling of the sample since the compound
is a gas and readily volatilizes.
Bromomethane also a gas has another facet to consider. Analyses
of the ampuls after completion of the method study indicated that
degradation had occurred and therefore the regression equations
are not suggested for use. This problem also occurred in the
quality control samples which are made available to the public
through the QAB of EMSL-Cincinnati.
Stability problems for both cis and trans 1,3-dichloropropene were
also discovered by analyzing the ampuls after the method study was
completed. Therefore the equations are not recommended for use.
55
-------
The 88% mean recovery for 3,2-dichlcroethane from all waters in-
cl Me the original recovery values for both wastewaters 1 and 3.
Calculations of percent recovery across all waters using the new
revised equations resulted in an average of 99.7%.
Examining bias in the statistical summaries for 1,1,2-trichloro-
ethane in all waters and concentration levels indicates a close
comparison with the average percent recovery of 86%. This re-
covery also compares closely with those reported in Method 602
which were 91% and 75% for trichloroethane and its isomer 1,1,1-
trichloroethane respectively. Therefore the method study value
of 86% appears reasonable.
.The high Youden pair true value for 1,4 dichlorobenzene appears to
be in error since the recoveries for the highest concentration
averaged approximately 65% in comparison to 95% for the other con-
centrations. Stability of the ampuls were confirmed by both MC
and QAB. MC data indicated no change from time zero to time six
months. However an error in production of the standard solution
could have occurred which could yield only meaningful values for
stability but not for accuracy. The QAB analytical data at the
end of the study agreed with the true values of the low and middle
Youden pairs yet had an analytical value of 66% for the true value
for the highest Youden pair. Since the highest concentrations
could not be verified and a reasonable value could not be substi-
tuted the revised equations were based on the low and middle /ou-
den pairs only.
An examination of the bias in the statistical summaries of
trichloroethene also indicates an apparent error in the middle
Youden pair by a factor of two which is probably due to a dilu-
tion error during production. Analyses by MC showed no change
in the ampul concentration from time zero to time six months.
Analyses by QAB at a later date indicated degradation because
only 2% of the true value was found. The low QAB value is not
56
-------
considered meaningful because trichloroethene easily decomposes
when exposed to light and moisture. Revising the regression equa-
tions by changing the middle Youden pair true value by a factor of
two yielded an average of 92%.
PRECISION
Similarly, the overall and single-analyst precisions were deter-
mined as %RSD's for each analyte, water type, and concentration
level. As presented in Appendix D, 1008 individual values of
overall %RSD and 504 individual values of %RSD-SA result. The
linear regression of standard deviation, S, versus mean recovery,
X, provides values of %RSD over all the concentration ranges.
This reduces the separate measures of precision to 168; one value
for each of 28 analytes in each of six w?ter-types. Tables 14 and
15 present the %RSD as measured by the slopes of the linear regres-
sion equations presented earlier in Tables 1-2 for the overall and
the single-analyst precision, respectively.
In Table 14, the overall %RSD's are entered for the analytes in
the six water matrices. The average %RSD for each analyte in all
six waters is entered in the column on the far right, while the
average value for all analytes in each water is entered in the
bottom row. Further investigations indicated poorer precision
(higher values of %RSD) were obtained for chloromethane (50),
trans-l,3-dichloropropene (45), cis-1,3-dichloropropene (40), and
bromomethane (42). No other average values of %RSD exceeded 30.
The average %RSD for all analytes in each of the water matrices
was quite constant, varying between 24 to 29%.
Again the validity of the %RSD and %RSD-SA as obtained from the
slopes of the linear regression equations depends on a negligible
value for the intercept. The probable reasons for the poor preci-
sions are stability and background as previously explained under
the section of accuracy- Another source of variation is that two
57
-------
TABLE 14. OVERALL PERCENT RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATIONS
00
Mix
number
1
2
Compound
Trichlorofluorome thane
Chlorome thane
Vinyl chloride
trans-1 P2-Dichloroethene
1,1, 1-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Dibromochlorome thane
Tetrachloroethene
1 , 2-Dichlorobenzene
Bromome thane
Chloroe thane
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
Carbon tetrachloride
trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
1,1, 2-Trichloroe thane
Bromoform
Chlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
Distilled
water
26
52
27
17
20
23
24
18
13
36
17
29
19
20
40
19
21
18
28
! Tap
water
30
49
32
24
27
32
23
25
17
65
19
31
9
20
39
19
24
16
20
Slope oi
Surface V
water
25
55
33
21
23
37
22
22
IS
45
22
21
20
20
39
22
20
18
23
: regressioi
fastewater
1
31
49
22
23
30
27
14
35
19
40
9
28
18
23
64
24
21
33
27
n equation
Wastewater
2
28
58
37
15
22
25
25
26
18
40
23
32
17
21
37
19
22
21
30
Wastewatei
3
29
38
21
23
37
28
26
26
17
26
29
20
19
22
51
22
22
36
37
Average
• of all
waters
28
50
29
21
27
2S
22
25
17
42
20
27
17
21
45
21
22
24
28
(continued)
-------
TABLE 14 (continued)
Mix
number
3
Compound
Hethylene chloride
1 , 1-Dichloroe thane
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
Bromodichlorome thane
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
1,1,2. 2-Tetrachloroe thane
1 , 3-Dichlorobenzene
Average of all analytes
Distilled
water
21
14
15
20
28
38
23
26
24
Tap
water
17
18
18
18
27
34
20
24
26
Slope
Surface
water
14
14
18
17
21
49
26
23
26
of regression equation
Wastewater
1
18
16
28
21
30
46
44
29
28
Wastewater
2
20
16
18
22
30
37
30
20
26
Wastewater
3
19
16
71
24
31
36
28
23
29
Average
of all
vaters
18
16
28
20
23
40
29
24
27
From Table 1 for overall precision.
-------
TABLE 15. SINGLE-ANALYST PERCENT RELATIVE STANDARD DEVIATIONS
Mix
number
1
2
Compound
Trichlorofluorome thane
Chlorome thane
Vinyl chloride
trans-1 , 2-Dichloroe thene
1 . 1 , 1-Trichloroe thane
Tr ichloros thene
Dibromochlorome thane
Tetrachloroe thene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
Bromome thane
Chloroe thane
1 , 1-D.ichloroe thene
Chloroform
Carbon tetrachloride
trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene
1 , 1 , 2-Triehloroe thane
Bromoform
Chlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
Distilled
water
15
28
13
11
15
13
11
14
10
28
14
21
13
15
15
13
12
15
14
Tap
water
22
28
14
16
14
13
10
17
12
24
7
12
5
10
14
6
10
7
16
Slope ol
Surface V
water
15
24
16
12
14
13
11
13
9
23
18
10
12
13
17
12
17
12
9
: regressio
fastewater
1
18
22
12
13
15
10
5
22
14
11
8
19
13
10
28
17
18
14
17
a
n equation
Wastewater
2
14
13
12
10
10
16
10
18
13
13
7
7
10
9
11
9
8
12
11
Wastewater
3
16
19
9
14
18
15
1?.
13
10
12
10
14
7
10
20
8
17
18
16
Average
of all
waters
17
22
13
13
14
13
10
16
11
19
11
14
10
11
13
11
14
13
14
(continued)
-------
TABLE 15 (continued)
Mix
number
3
Compound
Hethylene chloride
1 , 1-Dichloroe thane
1 ,2-Dichloroe thane
Bromodichlorome thane
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
1,1,2, 2-Tetrachloroe thane
1 , 3-Dichlorobenzene
Average of all analytes
Distilled
water
11
9
11
11
18
11
14
14
14
Tap
water
8
9
6
13
19
17
9
15
13
Slope
Surface
water
8
6
8
9
12
23
11
15
13
of regression equation
Wastewater
1
9
13
18
10
17
19
19
21
15
Wastewater
2
12
13
10
9
20
20
16
14
12
Wastewater
3
14
12
25
12
21
18
15
13
14
Average
of all
waters
10
10
13
11
18
18
14
15
14
From Table 1 single-analyst precision for accuracy.
-------
labs (8 and 9) heated the column past the manufacturer's recom-
mended maximum temperature which results in a loss of liquid phase
and change of retention times related to the other laboratories.
Also three laboratories used prem.ixed standard solutions which are
not recommended due to instability of the gaseous standards over
time.
The values for %RSD-SA presented in Table 15 indicated the ex-
pected improvement in intralaboratory precision over that of the
interlaboratory precision as given in Table 14. The analytes giv-
ing the poorest average precision over all six waters were, again,
chloromethane (22), bromomethane (19), cis-1,2-dichloropropene
(18), and trafls-l,2-dichloropropene (18) along with 1,2-dichloro-
propane (18). The average %RSD-SA values for all compounds in
each water were very constant, ranging from 12 to 15%.
EFFECTS CF WATER TYPES
The comparison of accuracy and precision across water types is
summarized in Table 16 where the observed F values and the
probability of exceeding the F values are entered for each of
the 27 analytes in each of the six water matrices. For 12 of
the halocarbons, the F-test suggests a statistically significant
effect due to water type [P(F > observed F) ^0.05].
I
Although statistical significance is indicated by the F-test, the
null hypothesis test indicates that a practical effect due to
water type is established for only four of the analytes: carbon
tetrachloride in wastewater 1; chlorobenzene in wastewater 1; 1,4-
dichlorobenzene in wastewater 3; and 1,2-dichloroethane in tap
water, surface water and wastewater 3. The practical significance
of water type on accuracy and precision was calculated using the
null hypothesis approach that zero is not contained within the
four compounds in the specific waters (see Tables presented in
Appendix E.
62
-------
TABLE 16. SUMMARY OF THE TESTS FOR DIFFERENCE ACROSS WATER TYPES
Mix
number
1
2
3
Compound
Trichloroflu :oraet.iane
Chlorome thane
Vinyl chloride
trans-1 , 2-Dichloroethene
1,1, 1-Trichloroe thane
Trichloroethene
Dibroraochlorome thane
Tetrachloroethene
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
Bromome thane
Chloroethane
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
Chloroform
Carbon tetrachloride
trans-1 ,3-Oichloropropene
1,1, 2-Trichioroe thane
Bromoform
Chlorobenzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene
Methylene chloride
1 , 1-Dichloroe thane
1 ,2-Dichloroe thane
Bromodichlorome thane
1 , 2-Dichlcropropane
cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1 , 3-Dichlorobenzene
F-test
statistically
significant
at the
5% level?
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Statistical Practical
significance significance
established established
by the 95% by the 95%
confidence confidence
limit? limit?
.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Yes Yes
-
-
-
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
-
-
Yes Yes
-
-
-
-
-
haters
4
4
6
6
-------
In the case .f rarbon tetrachloride the regression equations for
water 4 indicated at least 10% lower than any other water. The
primary reason for this is the low recoveries of the low Youden
pairs (65-70%). In the cases of chlorobenzene in wastewater 1 and
1,2-dichloroethane in wastewater 3 the effect of water type is
niost likely attributed to the high background concentrations of
these analytes in the specific water matrix (e.g., an average of
1717 ug/L chlorobeazene in wastewater 1, and an average of 636 }jg/L
1,2-dichloroethane in wastewater 3). The resultant high blank cor-
rections would contribute to a wide variability in accuracy and
precision among the 20 laboratories, especially for the low and
medium Youden pair concentration levels. This problem is graphi-
cally illustrated in Table 68 where the mean recovery of chloroben-
zene in ampul 1 (wastewater 1) is 150.25 pg/L compared to a "true
value" of 10.00 M9/L- A similar effect as noted in Table 72 where
the mean recoveries of 1,2-dichloroethane in ampuls 1 and 2 (waste-
water 3) are 53.23 (jg/L and 56.08 pg/L compared to true values of
8.00 and 10.00 ug/L, respectively. Examination of 1,4 dichloro-
benzene data indicated an overall high recovery at all concentra-
tions which indicates a practical significance.
The above rationale does not, however, .ccount for the practical
effect of 1,2-dichloroethane in tap and surface waters. In these
cases the background levels of the analytes in the specific waters
were low. Further investigations of data show no practical signi-
ficance.
RESPONSE TO QUESTIONNAIRE
A questionnaire was provided to the 20 participating laboratories.
Ten laboratories completed the questionnaire. Table 17 summarizes
the analytical conditions employed by the responding laboratories.
Of the respondents, four used a Tracer Model 560 gas chromatograph
while the other six use various models of Varian, Perkin-Elmer,
64
-------
TABLE 17. LABORATORY ANALYTICAL CONDITIONS
in
Carrier
Laboratory Gas Temperature program gas/flowrate,
code chroma tograph min, °C mL/min
3C
4
Tracer 560 45°(3 min), 8°/min
to 225°, hold 15
min
Tracer
Varian 3740 45°(3 min), 8°/min
to 220°, hold 15
min
Perkin-Elmer 45°(3 min), 8°/min
Sigma I to 220°
Hewlett-
Packard
5750
Tracer 560
Varian 3700
55°(3 min), 8°/min
to 220°, hold 17
min
45°(3 min), 8°/min
to 220°
45°(3 min), 8°/min
to 250°, hold 7
min
He-40 1% SP-1000 on bO/' mes1
Carbopack B
He-40 1% SP-1000 on 60/80 mash
Carbopack B
SP-21C precolumn
He-60 1'?; -'?-•-1000 on 6C/80 mesh
: iopack B
3.\ - 000 precolumn
He-40 1% -.000 on 60/80 mer.h
Cu.oopack B
He-40 1% SP-1000 on 60/80 mesh
Carbopack B
He-40 1% SP-1000 on 60/80 mesh
Carbopack B
(continued)
-------
TABLE 17 (continued)
Carrier
Laboratory Gas Temperature program gas/flowrate,
code chroma tograph min,°C mL/min
Column packing
o>
10'
11
14
17'
18
19
20{
Perkin-Elmer
3920
Tracor 560
Tracer 560
Hewlett-
Packard
5840
Micro Tek
MT-22G
Hewlett-
Packard
5730-A
Tracor
MT-220
45°(3 min), 8°/min
to 220°, hold 25
min
45°(3 min), 8°/min
to 220°
45°(3 min), 7.5°/min
to 220°, hold
45°(4 min), 250°(32
min)
He
He-30
He-56
He-40
He-40
1% SP-1000 on 60/80 mesh
Carbopack B
1% SP-1000 on 60/80 mesh
Carbopack B
1% SP-1000 on 60/80 mesh
Cardopack B
1% SP-1000 on 60/80 mesh
Carbopack B
(continued)
-------
TABLE 17 (continued)
Laboratory
code
1
3a
4
5
6
7
8
Gas
chromatograph
Tracer 560
Tracer
Varian 3740
Perkin-Elmer
Sigma I
Hewlett-
Packard
5750
Tracor 560
Varian 3700
Column size
8 ft
-
8 ' x 2 mm.
8' x 2 mm.
glass
8' x 1/8"
stainless
steel
8' x 1/10"
glass
8' x 2 mm
glass
Detector
model
Hall
700A
Hall
700A
Hall
700A
Coulson
451
(WSA)
Hall
700A
Hall
700A
Hall
700A
H2 flow,
mL/min
25
-
60
20
30
50
30
Furnace
temperature
°C
850
-
810
820
875
825
800
Electrolyte/
flowrate,
mL/min
Methanol-0.65
-
n-Propanol-0. 8
100% water
n-Propanol-0 . 6
n-Propanol-0 . 5
n-Propanol-1 . 0
(continued)
-------
TABLE 17 (continued)
00
Laboratory
code
9a
ioa
11
14
17a
18
19
20a
Gas
chromatcgraph
Perkin-Elmer
3920
—
Tracer 560
Tracer 560
Hewlett-
Packard
5840
Micro Tek
MT-220
Hewlett-
Packard
5730-A
Tracor
MT-220
Detector H2 flow,
Column size model mL/min
_
_
Hall 60
700A
8' x 2 mm Hall 20
glass 700A
— — ••
8' glass Coulson 20
Hall 30
700A
_
Furnace Electrolyte/
temperature flowrate,
°C mL/min
-
-
900 n-Propanol-1.0
820 n-Propanol-0.35
_ —
800 P/N AG501-X8,
20/50 mesh
1,000 n-Propanol-0.5
-
(continued)
-------
TABLE 17 (continued)
vO
Laboratory Gas
code chromatograph
1 Tracer 560
3a Tracor
4 Varian 3740
5 Perkin-Elmer
Sigma I
6 Hewlett-
Packard
5750
7 Tracor 560
Purge/trap
instrument
Tekmar
LSC-2
Tekmar
LSC-2
Tekmar
LSC-1
CDS 310
Tekmar
LSC-2
Tekmar
LSC-2
Purge/desorb/
bake cycle,
Mode min
Manual 11-4-7
-
Manual 11-4-7+
Automatic 11-purge
7-burn at
180°
Automatic 11-7-4
Automatic 11-4-20
Trap material
Tenax/silica gel/
charcoal
-
Tenax/silica gel/
charcoal
Tenax/silica gel/
charcoal
Tenax/charooal
50/50
Tenax/silica gel/
3% OV-1
Varian 3700
Homemade
Manual
11-4-variable
Silicone/Tenax/
silica gel/
charcoal
(continued)
-------
TABr.E 17 (continued)
Laboratory
code
9a
10a
11
14
17a
18
19
20a
Gas
chromatograph
Perkin-Elmer
3920
—
Tracer 560
Tracer 560
Hewlett-
Packard
5840
Micro Tek
MT-220
Hewlett-
Packard
5730-A
Tracer
MT-220
Purge/desorb/
Purge/trap bake cycle,
instrument Mode min
Homemade
Tekmar
Homemade Manual 1.2-3-30
Homemade Manual 11-4-7
«-
Tekmar
LSC-2
Tekmar Manual 12-4-10
LSC-1
Tekmar - 12-5-45
LSC-2
Tekmar Automatic
LSC-2
Trap material
Tenax/OV-1/silica
gel/charcoal
tf
Tenax/3% OV-1/
silica gel/
charcoa]
Tenax/3% OV-1/
silica gel/
charcoal
-
Tenax/silica gel/
charcoal
Tenax/silica gel/
charcoal
-
Responses to questionnaire not received from these laboratories. Information supplied
in table was obtained from original proposals from the laboratories.
-------
Hewlett-Packard and Microtech gas chromatographs. In every case
helium was used as a carrier gas with flows from 30 to 60 mL/min
(the majority employing a flow of -40 mL/min). In every case an
8 foot Carbopack B 60/80 mesh column coated with 1% SP-1000 was
used. One laboratory reported using a 4 cm, SP-2100 precolumn.
In most ca^e the temperature programming on the column was held
three or four minutes at 45°C (one laboratory, 55°), followed by
an 8°C/min temperature program (one laboratory, 7.5°C/minute), to
a final temperature of from 220°C (six laboratories) to 250°C (one
laboratory). This final temperature was held constant from periods
of 7 to 32 minutes to assure elution of all the purgeable halocar-
bons. The laboratory which used 250°C as the final temperature
exceeded the maximum recommended temperature for the column. This
results in a lost of liquid phase and changes the retention times.
Eight of the ten respondents employed the Tracor 700A Hall Detector,
while two used a Coulson Detector. The hydrogen gas flow rate em-
ployed ranged from 20 to 60 mL/minute with furnace temperatures
ranging from 800°C to 1000°C. n-Propanol was the electrolyte used
in seven laboratories; others used methanol or water. The elec-
trolyte flows ranged from 0.35 mL/minute to 1 mL/minute.
Six of the ten laboratories used Tekmar Purge/Trap Systems (three
used Model KSC-1, manual). Another laboratory used a CDS
Model 310 automatic concentrator, while the other three labora-
tories employed instruments designed and fabricated in their labor-
atories. Purge times ranged from 11 to 12 minutes; desorb times
from 3 to 7 minutes; and bake times from 4 to 45 minutes. In all
cases but one, helium was used as the carried gas primarily at a
40 mL/min flow rate. In one case a 40 mL/min N2 flow was used as
the carrier gas.
71
-------
The trap materials employed should have consisted of four mate-
rials: 3% OV-1 on 60/80 mesh Chromsorb W; Tenax®-GC porous poly-
mer, silica gel, and cocoanut charcoal. As described in the me-
thod two traps are acceptable. However lab 6 use3 a different
trap which is incapable of valid data for those compounds which
elute prior to methylene chloride. The data from lab 6 was re-
jected by the IMVS program as outliers for those compounds. Four
cases were reported where longer bake times were needed due to
concern of carry over from high concentrations samples. Installa-
tion of the trap in a backwards manner can cause this type of pro-
blem.
Most laboratories prepared their gaseous standard using gravi-
metric techniques (e.g., injecting gas into tared volumetric flask,
reweighing and diluting to mark). One laboratory bubbled gas
through methanol and determined standard concentration gravimetric-
ally. Three laboratories purchased premixed standards. Premixed
standards containing gases are not recommended due to stability
problems with the gases.
Comments on incidences of inability to detect low-chlorinated
volatile concentrations included the following:
• Interference peaks - high background of trans-l,3-dichloro-
propene in wastewaters R and T, and of chlorobenzene in
wastewater T interferred with the ability to measure low-
level spikes into these wastewaters (two comments).
• Poor detector sensitivity - three of the ten laboratories
that responded reported difficulties with detector sensitiv-
ity. One laboratory sited the following compounds; 2-chloro-
ethylvinyl ether, chloromethane, 1,2-dichlorobenzene, 1,3-di-
chlorobenzene, trans-l,2-dichloroethene, tetrachloroethene,
72
-------
and trichloroethene. Two other laboratories reported sensi-
tivity problems with bromoform, bromornethane, dichioro-
fluoromethane, and vinyl chloride. Seven laboratories
reported no problems with sensitivity.
• Analyte not released from trap - one laboratory felt that
1,1-dichloroethene, chlorobenzene, and the dichlorobenzenes
did not trap well. Another questioned the purge/trap effi-
ciencies of the dichlorobenzenes.
• Baseline noise - no laboratories experienced baseline noise
problems.
• Initial concentrations too low - no laboratories reported
specific problems with low initial concentrations.
• Other comments - one laboratory felt that some compounds
were lost in the purge/trap cycle but didn't specify which
ones. Two laboratories had difficulties in eluting the
dichlorobenzenes, one feeling that the final column temper-
ature employed (220°C) was not sufficient to get sharp peaks,
while the other did not elute these compounds at 250°C (held
32 minutes).
»
esponses to other questions concerning the Method 601 analysis are
ummarized as follows:
Linearity of detector response - eight of the ten responses
had comments on the linearity of detector response. General-
ly, the response was not linear over concentrations of 200
(jg/L. Two other laboratories observed a diminished response
foj lower concentration standards (5-15 ppb). One labora-
tory sited nonlinear behavior for bromoform, chloromethane,
dibromochloromethane and dichlorobromomethane below 50 ppb.
73
-------
Another laboratory noted a decrease in linearity with an
increase in bromine content. In some cases, the high con-
centration spikes resulted in overload of the gas chromatog-
raphic integrator. One laboratory diluted all high concen-
tration spikes before final analysis to overcome this problem.
Calibration method - several calibration methods were em-
ployed by the ten respondents including: (1) two-point cali-
bration with bracketing standards; (2) external standards at
three concentration levels and blank; (3) external standards
using closest standard to concentration (three laboratories);
(4) linear least squares calibration; (5) seven to eight
point standard curve initially, with one point confirmation
using standard near concentration; (6) average response fac-
tor of at least five calibration points; and (7) calibration
factor from digital integrator.
Day-to-day detection sensitivity variability - eight labora-
tories reported no problem with variations in detection
sensitivity. One laboratory which noted problems felt the
variation was due to slight changes in flow rate. Another
laboratory suspected that variations in laboratory ambient
temperature could be affecting performance of the conductiv-
ity cell.
Problem compounds - The isomers of 1,3-dichloropropene were
found to be unstable after completion of the study by QAB.
This instability is verified by the regression equations which
show overall low recoveries and poor precision. An impurity
or breakdown product of 1,2-dichloropropane was found during
analyses by both QAB and one of the participating laborator-
ies.
74
-------
The gas bromomethane is suspect to stability. The interpre-
tation of the mean recovery generally low is hampered by the
large standard deviation. However, past history of quality
control samples also indicated instability of bromomethane.
Gases are difficult to handle and the accuracy and precision
regression equations show this by poor recoveries and poor
precision.
Water type problems - several comments were centered on the
high halocarbon backgrounds in the wastewaters that resulted
in cross-contamination and column deterioration. This was
particularly true of wastewaters 1 and 3, but one laboratory
had difficulty only with wastewater 2, citing interference to
detection of low-level concentrations. The high level of
1,2-dichloropropane in wastewater 3 caused co-elution of this
compound with cis-1,3-dichloropropene in one laboratory. One
laboratory observed late eluting peaks in wastewater 1, and a
variable concentration of methylene chloride in wastewater 3.
Several laboratories received water samples especially 3,
with cracked caps. Two of the ten laboratories reported no
problems with wastewaters.
Miscellaneous comments - one laboratory experienced problems
due to CH2C12 and CHC13 vapors in the ambient laboratory air
causing contamination, and had to move to a "cleaner" room.
One laboratory had to dilute solutions involving the high con-
centration spikes in order to quantitate. Another laboratory
stated that retention times indicated that mix 1 contained
1,3-dichlorobenzene rather than 1,2-dichlorobenzene.
The participating laboratories were asked for any recommendations
which might improve Method 601. Of the ten responses, seven had
suggestions as follows:
75
-------
Consider alternative methods of handling highly contaminated
samples (waters). Two laboratories critiqued the study (not
the method) by suggesting lower background levels in the
wastewaters, and decreasing either the number of samples/
injections or the total Method 601 run time.
Tedious sample preparation and handling is a problem. The
method itself is not a problem.
In preparation of standards, specify that enough neat com-
pound be added to result in a mass change greater than 10
mg. This will permit three significant figures to be used
in later calculations.
To alleviate carryover problems from the purge/trap cycle:
(1) use disposable sample purger; or (2) use several purgers
and selector valves. This would permit removal of contami-
nated purging volumes for cleaning during chromatographic
cycle.
Specify the analytical ranges of the halocarbons u»ing the
Hall detector. In some cases one laboratory was at the
upper limit for detector at the lOx setting.
Specify that ambient air concentrations of organic solvents
must the minimized.
Two laboratories recommended that tht; dichlorobenzenes be
omitted from Method 601. The feeling here is that Method
602 has much better efficiency (extraction) for the dichlo-
robenzenes and that the omission of these compounds would
shorten the chromatographic run time in Method 601.
76
-------
REFERENCES
1. Youden, W. J. Statistical Techniques for Collaborative
Tests. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Inc.,
Washington, D.C., 1969. 64 pp.
2. Outler, E. C. and McCreary, J. H., Interlaboratory Method
Validation Study: Program Documentation, Battelle Columbus
Laboratories, 1982.
3. ASTM D2777-77, 1980 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Part 31,
pp. 16-28. American Society for Testing and Materials,
Philadelphia, Pa.
4. ASTM E178-80, 1980 Annual Book of ASTM Standards Part 41,
pp. 206-231, American Society for Testing and Materials,
Philadelphia, Pa.
5. Youden, W. J. "Statistical Manual of the AOAC", The Associa-
tion of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, 1975.
6. Thompson, W. R. "On a Criterion for the Rejection of Observa-
tions and the Distribution of the Ratio of the Deviation to the
Sample Standard Deviations". The Annals of Mathematical Stat-
istics, AASTA 6_ (1935) pp 214-219.
7. Britton, P. W.. "Statistical Basis for Laboratory Performance
Evaluation Limits." Presented at the 142nd Joint Statistical
Meeting, Cincinnati, Ohio, August 17, 1982.
77
-------
8. Warner, B. J., et al. "Determination of Trihalomethanes by
the Purge and Trap Method (Method 501.1): Validation of Ana-
lytical Method." U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Qual-
ity Assurance Branch, EMSL-Cincinnati, contract 68-03-2856.
9. Warner, B. J., et al. "Determination of Trihalomethanes by
Liquid/Liquid Extraction (Method 501.2): Validation of Ana-
lytical Method." U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Qual-
ity Assurance Branch, EMSL-Cincirnati, contract 68-03-2356.
10. Warner, B. J., et al. "Determination of Purgeable Aromatics
(Method 602): Validation of Analytical Method." U.S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency, Quality Assurance Branch, EMSL-Cin-
cinnati contract 68-03-2856.
78
-------
APPENDIX A
TEST METHOD: PURGEABLE HALOCARBONS - METHOD 601
79
-------
ijn.ied Slates
Environmental Protection
Agency
SuDOOrt lsr:or 31 ir y
Cincinnati OH 4526
Test f
Purgeable Halocarbons
Method 601
1. Scope and Application
1.1 This method covers the determi-
nation of 29 purgeabie halocarbons.
The following parameters may be
determined by this method:
Parameter
STORF.T No.
CAS No.
BromodicMoromethane
Bromoform
Bromomethane
Carbon tetrachlonde
Chloroben/ene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Dibromochloromethans
,2-Dichlorobenzene
,2-Dichlorobenzene
,4-Dichloroben/ene
Jichlorodif luoromethane
,1-Dichloroethane
,2-Dichloroethane
1 ,1 -Dichloroethene
trans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethpne
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Methylen* chloride
1 .1 ,2.2-Tntrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1,1.1 -Tnchioroethane
1 , 1 ,2-Tnchloroethane
Tnchloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethan*
Vinyl chloride
32101
32104
34413
32102
34301
3431 1
34576
32106
34418
32105
34536
34566
34571
34668
34496
34531
34501
34546
34541
34704
34699
34423
34516
34475
34506
34511
391 BO
34438
39175
75-27-4
75-25-2
74-83-9
56-23-5
108-90-7
75-00-3
100-75-8
67-66-3
74-87-3
1 24-48-1
95-50-1
541-73-1
106 46-7
75-71-8
75-".4-3
107-06-2
75-35-4
1 56 60-5
78-87-5
10061 01-5
10061 02-6
75-09-2
79-34-5
127-18-4
71 5S-6
79-00-5
79-01-6
75-69-4
75-01-4
1.2 This is a pu'ge and trap gas
chron,Biographic method applicable to
the determine.on of the ".ompounds
listed above in municipal and industrial
discharges as provided under 40 CFR
1 36.1. When tr.ii method :s u^ed to
analyze urifarrvliar samples for any or
all of the compounds above, compound
identification should ce supported by at
least one additional qualitative
80
-------
technique. This method describes
analytical conditions for a second gas
chromatogiaphic column that can be
used to confirm measurements made
with the primary column. Method 524
provides gas chromatograph/mar.s
spectrometer (GC MS) conditions
appropriate for the qualitative and
quantitative confirmation of results (of
most of the parameters listed above.
1.3 The method detection limit (MDL.
defined m Section 1 2.1 )M' for each
parameter is listed in Table 1. The MDL
for a specific wastewater may differ
from those listed, depending upon the
nature of interferences in the sample
matrix.
1.4 Any modification of this method,
beyond ihose expressly permitted,
shall be considered as major . ..odidca-
tions subject :o application and
approve1 of alternate test procedures
under 40 CFR 1 36.4 and 1 36.5.
1.5 This method is restricted to use
by or under the supervision of analysts
experienced
-------
not be heated higher than 1 80 °C and
the remaining sections should not
exceed 220 °C. The desorber design,
illustrated in Figure 2, meets thasa
criteria. '
5.2.4 The purge and trap device may
be assembled as a separate unit or b«
coupled to a gas chromatograph as
illustrated in Figures 3 and 4.
5.3 Gas chromatograph —An analyti-
cal system complete with a tempera-
ture programmable gas chromatograph
suitable for on-coiumn injection end all
required accessories including syringes,
analytical columns, gases, detector,
and strip-chart recorder. A data system
is recommended for measuring peak
areas.
5.5. 1 Column 1 —8 ft long x 0.1 in
ID stainless steel or glass, packed with
1% SP-1000 on Carbopack 8(60/80
mesh) or equivalent. This column was
used to develop the method perfor-
mance statements in Section 12.
Guidelines for the use of alternate
column packings are provided in
Section 10.1.
5.3.2 Column 2-6 ft long x 0.1 in
10 stainless steel or glass, packed with
chemically bonded n-octane on Porasil-
C (10011 201 mesh or equivalent.
5.3.3 Detector—Electrolytic conduc-
tivity or microcoulometric. These types
of detectors have proven effective in
the analysis of wastewaters for the
parametars listed in the scope. The
electrolytic conductivity detector was
used to develop the method perfor-
mance statements and MOL listed in
Tables 1 and 2. Guidelines fcr the use
of alternate detectors are provided in
Section 10.1.
5.4 Syringes — 5-mL glass hypo-
dermic with luerlok tip (two each), if
applicable to the purging device.
6.5 Micro syringe*-25 ML, 0.006 in
10 needle.
5.6 Syringe valve— 2-way. with Luer
ends (three each).
6.7 Syringe - 5-mL, gas-tight with
shut-off valva.
6.8 Bottle-1 5-mL, screw cap, with
Teflon cap liner.
5.9 Balance —Analytical, capable of
accurately weighing 0.0001 g.
6. Reagents
6.1 Reagent water-Reagent water in
defined as a water in which an
interferes is not observed at the MOL
of the parameters of interest
6.1.1 Reagent water can ba ganeratod
by passing tap water through a carbon
filter bed containing about 1 Ib of
activated carbon (Filuasorb-300 or
equivalent (Cslgon Corp,)).
6.1.2 A Wuter purification system
(Millipore Super-Q or equivalent) may
ba used to generate reagent water.
6,1.3 Raagent water mey also ba
prepared by boiling water for 1 5
minutes. Subsequently, while maintain-
ing the temperature at 90 °C, bubbta a
contaminant-frae inert gas through the
water for one hour. While still hot.
transfer the water to a narrow mouth
screw-cap bottie and seal with a
Teflon-lined septum and cap.
6.2 Sodium thiosulfate-(ACS)
Granular.
6.3 Trap Materials
6.3.1 Coconut charcoal (5/10 mesh
sievjd to 26 mesh), (Bernaby Chaney,
CA-580-26 lot * M-2649 or
equivalent).
6.3.2 2.6-Oiphenylena oxide
polymer —Tenax, (60/80 mesh),
chromatographic grade or equivalent.
6.3.3 Methyl silicone packing—3 %
OV-1 on 60/80 mesh Chromosorb-W
or equivalent.
6.3.4 Silica gel—35/60 mesh,
Lavison, grade-1 5 or equivalent.
6.4 Methyl Alcohol—Pesticide quality
or equivalent.
6.5 Stock standard solutions—Stock
standard solutions may be prepared
from pure standard materials or
purchased as certified solutions.
Prepare stock standard solutions in
methyl alcohol using assayed liquids or
gas cylinders as appropriate. Because
of the toxicity of some of the
organohalides, primary dilutions of
these materials should be prepared in a
hood. A NIOSH/MESA approved toxic
gas respirator should be used when tha
analyst handles high concentrations of
such materials.
S.S.I Place about 9.8 ml.of methyl
alcohol into a 10-mL ground glass
stoppered volumetric flask. Allow the
flask to stand, unstoppered, for about
10 minutes or until ell alcohol wetted
surfaces have dried. Weigh the flask to
the nearest 0.1 mg.
G.S.2 Add the assayed reference
material:
6.5.2.1 Liquids - Using a 100-/1L
syringe, immediately add two or more
drops of assayed reference material to
Ihe flask, then rewci^h. Be sure that •
the drops fall directly into the alcohol
without contacting tha neck of the
flask.
5.5.2.2 Gases—To prepare standards
for any of the six hslocarbons that boil
below 30 °C (bromom
-------
7. Calibration
,7.1 Assemble a purge and trzp device
that meets the specifications in Section
5.2 Condition the trap overnight at
180°C by b&ckflushing with an inert
gas (low of at least 20 mL mm. Prior to
use daily condition traps 10 minutes
while backflushmg at 1 80 °C.
7.2 Connect the purge and trap
dev.ce to a gas chromatog'aph. The
gas chtomatcgraph must be operated
using temperature and flow rate param-
eters equivalent to those in Table 1.
Calibrate the purge and trap-gas
chromatographic system using either
more
than x 10%. the test must be repeated
using a fresh calibration standard
Alternatively. • new calibration curve
or calibration factor must bo prepared
for that parameter.
7.4 Internal standard calibration
procedure. To use this approach, the
analyst must select one or more internal
standards that are similar in nn.Mytical
behavior to the compounds of interest.
The analyst must further demonstrate
that the measurement of the internal
standard is not affected by method or
matrix interferences. Because of these
limitations, no internal standard can be
suggested that is applicable to all
samples. The compounds recommended
for use as surrogate spikes in Section
8 7 have been used successfully as
internal standards, because of their
generally unique retention times.
7.4. 7 Prepare calibration standards
at a minimum of three concentration
levels for each parameter of interest as
described in Section 7.3.1.
7.4.2 Prepare a spiking solution con-
taining each of the internal standards
using the procedures described in
Sections 6.5 and 6.6. It is recom-
mended that the secondary dilution
standard be prepared at a concentra-
tion of 1 5 ^o/mL of each internal
standaid compound. The addition of
10/iL of this standard to 5.0 ml of
sample or calibration standard would
be equivalent to 30 pg/L.
7.4.3 Analyze each calibration stand-
aid, according to Section 10, adding
10 n L of internal standard spiking so'u-
tion directly to the syringe (Section
10.4). Tabulate peak height or a'ea
responses against concentration for
each compound and internal standard.
and calculate response factors (RF) for
each compound using equation 1.
Eq. 1 RF - (AtC,,)/(A,tCV
where:
AC - Response for the parameter to
be measured.
A,, - Response for the internal
standard.
C,, » Concentration of tha internal
standard.
C, « Concentration of the
parameter to be measured.
If the RF value over the working range
is a ccr.stant (-<:10% RSO), the RF can
be assumed to be invariant and the
average RF can be used for calculations.
Alternatively, the results can be used
to plot a calibration curve of response
ratios, A,/Art. vs. RF.
7.4.4 The working calibration curve
or RF must be verified on each working
day by the measurement of one or
more calibration standards. If the
lesponse for any parameter varies from
the predicted response by more than
± 10%. the test Tiust be 'epeated
usmrj a U»sh calibration standard.
Alternatively, t n^w calibration curve
must be prepared for that compound.
8. Quality Control
8. I Each laboratory that uses this
method is required to operate a formal
quality control p/ogram. The minimum
requirement^. o< this program consist of
an initial demonstration of laboratory
capability and the analysis of spiked
samples as a continuing check on
performance. The laboratory is required
to maintain performance records to
define the quality of data that is
generated. Ongoing performance
checks must be compared with estab-
lished performance criteria to determine
if the results of analyses are within
accuracy and precision limits expected
of the method.
8. J. 1 Before performing any
analyses, the analyst must demonstrate
the ability to generate acceptable
accuracy and precision with this
method. This ability is established as
described in Section 8.2.
8.1.2 In recognition of the rapid
advances that are occurring in chroma-
tography, the analyst is permitted cer-
tain options to improve the separations
or lower the cost of 'neasurements.
Each time such mojifications arc made
to the methrd. the analyst is required
to repeat tiie procedure in Section 8.2.
8.1.3 The laboratory must spike and
analyze a minimum of 10% of all
samples to monitor continuing labora-
tory performance. This procedure is
described in Section 8.4.
8.2 To establish the ability to generate
acceptable accuracy and precision, the
analyst must perform tha following
operations.
8.2. / Select a representative spike
concentration for each compound to be
measured. Using stock standards.
prepare a quality control check sampls
concentrate in methyl alcohol 500
times more concentrated than the
selected concentrations. Quality
control check sample concentrates,
appropriate for use with th.s method,
will be available from the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agen-y.
Environmental Monitoring and Support
Laboratory. Cincinnati, Ohio 45268.
8.2.2 Usin; • syringe, add 10 tit of
the check sample concentrate to each
of a minimum of four 5-mL aliquots of
reagent water. A representative waste-
83
-------
•vater may be used in placs of tha
reagent water, but one or more addi-
tional aliquot* must be analyzed to
determine background levels, and the
spiks level must exceed twice tha
background level for the test to be
valid. Analyze the aliquocs according to
the method beginning in Section 10.
8,2.3 Calculate the average percent
recovery, (R). and t(i* standard devia-
tion of the percent recovery Is), for tha
results. Westewater background cor-
rections must be made before R and »
calculations are performed.
8.34 Using Tarye 2. note the average
recovery (XI and standard deviation (p)
expected for each method parameter.
Compare these to the calculated value*
for Rands. If s :»• 2p or |X-R| =»• 2p,
review potential problem areas and
repeat the test.
8.3 The ?;ialyst must calculate
method performance criteria and define
the performance of the laboratory for
each spike concentration and parameter
being measured.
5.7.5 The U.S. Environmental
Protee'.ion Agency plant to establish
perfo-mar.ce criteria for R and s based
upon the r-«ults of interlaboutory
testing. When they become available,
these criteria must be met before any
samples may be analyzed.
8.3.1 Calculate upper end lower
control !>mts for method performance:
Upper Control Limit (UCU • R + 3s
Lower Control Limit (LCD - R - 3a
where R and s ere calculated as in
Section 3.2.3. The UCL«nd LCLcan
be used to construct control charts17'
that are useful in observing trends in
performance. The control limits above
must be replaced by method perfor-
mance criteria as trwy become available
from the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency.
8.3.2 The laboratory must develop
and maintain separate accuracy state-
ments of laboratory performance for
wastewater samples. An accuracy
statement for tha method is defined as
R ± s. Tha accuracy statement should
be developed by the snarysis of four
afiquots of wastawatet as described in
Section 8.2.2. followed by the calcu-
lation of R and s. Alternately, the
analyst may u»a four waetewatw data
points gathered through tha require-
ment for continuing quality control In
Section 8.4. The accuracy statement*
should be updated reguterty.m
8.4 The laboratory is required to
collect s portion of their samples in
duplicate to monitor «pik« recoveries.
The fr»cjij«ncy of spiked sample
analysis must be at least 10% of all
samples or one sampla per monjh,
whichever is grestar. One aliquot of tha
sample must be spiked and analyzed e»
described in Section 0.2. If tha
recovery for a particular parameter
does not fall within the control limits
for method performanca, the results
reported for that parameter in all
samples processad as part of the same
set must te Qualified as described in
Section 11.3. The laooraiory should
monitor the frequency of data so
qualified to ensure that it remains at or
below 5%.
8.S Each day, the analyst must
demonstrate through the analysis of
reagent water, that interferences from
the analytical system are under control.
8.8 It is recommended that the
laboratory adopt additional quality
assurance practices for use with this
method. The specific practices that are
most productive depend upon the
needs of the laboratory and the nature
of tho samples. Field duplicates may be
analyzed to monitor the precision of
the sampling technique. Whan doubt
exists over the identification of a peak
on the chrcmatogram, confirmatory
techniques such as gas chromatography
with a dissimilar column, specific
element detector, or mass spectrom-
eter must be used. Whenever possible.
the laboratory should perform analysis
of standard reference materials and
participate in relevant performanca
•valuation studios.
8.7 The analyst should maintain
constant surveillance of both the per-
formance of tha analytical system and
tha effectiveness of the method in
dealing with each sample matrix by
spiking each sample, standard and
blank with surrogate halocarbons. A
combination of bromocri>romethane,
2-bromo-1-chloropropane, and
1,4-dichlorobutane is recommended to
encompass the range of tha tempera-
ture program used in this method. From
stock standard solutions prepared as
above, add a volume to give 7500 pg
of each surrogate to 45 mL of reagent
water contained in a 50-mL volumetric
flask, mix and dilute to voluma (1 5
ng/j^LV If th« internal standard calibra-
ti^n procedure is being used, th«
surrogate compounds may be added
directly to tha internal standard spiking
solution (Section 7.4.21. Add 10^Lof
this surrogate spiking solution directly
into the 5-mL syringe with every sample
and reference standard snsl/ied. ,
Prepare a fresh surrogate spiking
solutivi on a weekly basis.
9. Sampla Collodion,
Preservation, and Handling
9.1 At! samples must be ic«d or
refrigerated from the time of collection
unti' extraction. If t>ie sample contain*
free or combined chlorine, add tedium
thiosulfate preservative (10 ffig/40 mL
is sufficient (or up to 5 ppm CI21 to the
empty sample bottle just prior to
shipping to the samp'ing si:e. US5PA
methods 330.4 and 330.5 may be
used for measurement of residual
chlorine.<8> Field test kits are available
for this purrosa.
9.2 Grab samples must be collected
in glass containers having a total
volume of tt least 25 mL. Fill the
sample bottle just to overflowing in
such a manner that no air bubbles pass
through tr> * sample as the bottle is
being filleu. Seal the bottle so that no
air bubbles ere entrapped in it. If
preservative has been added, shake
vigorously for onn minute. Maintain the
hermei'C seal on the sampls bottle until
time of analysis.
9.3 All samples must be analyzed
within 14 days of collection.
10. Sample Extraction and
Gas Chrom&tography
10.1 Table 1 summarizes the
recommended operating conditions for
the gas chromatograph. Included in this
Table are estimated retention timett and
method detection limits that can be
achieved by this method. An example
of the separations achieved by Column
1 is shown in Figuro 5. Other packed
columns, chromatographic conditions.
or detectors may be used if the
requirements of Section 8.2 era met.
10.2 Calibrate the system daily at
described in Section 7.
10.3 Adjust the purge gas (nitrogen
or helium) flow rate to 40 mUmin.
Attach the trap inlet to the purging
device, and set the device to purge.
Open the syringe valve located on the
purging device sample introduction
needle.
10.4 Allow sample to con-,) to
ambient temperature prior to introduc-
ing it to the syringe. Remove th*
plunger from e 5-mL syringe and attach
a closed syringe valve. Open the sample
bottle (or standard) and carefully pour
the sample into the syringe barrel to
just snort of overflowing. Replace the
84
-------
plunger and ccmp-ess The
sample Open the syringe valve end
vent any residual air while adjusting the
sample volume to 5 0 ml Since this
process ot taUmg an aliquot destroys
the valiQity ot the sample for future
analysis, the analyst should till a
second syringe at this time to protect
against possible loss of data. Add
10.0 vt of the surrogate spiking solu-
tion (B.7) and ' 0.0 ^L of the internal
standard spiking solution (Section
7.4.2). ii applicable, through the valve
bore, then close the valve.
10.5 Attach the syringe-syringe
valve assembly to the syringe valve on
the paging device Open the syringe
valves and inject the sample into the
purging chamber.
10.6 Close both valves and purge the
sample fof 11.0 ± .1 minutes at
ambient temperature.
10.7 After the 1 1-minute purge time.
attach the trap to the chromatogrsph.
adjust the device to the desrj.-b mode,
and begin to temperature program the
gas chromatograph. Introduce the
trapped materials to the GC column by
rapidly heating the trap to 1 80 °C
while backfiushmg the trap with an
inert gas between 20 and 60 mL'min
for four minutes. If rapid heating of the
trap cannot be achieved, the gas
chromatographic column must be used
as a secondary trap by cooling it to
30 °C (subambient temperature, if poor
peak geometry or random retention
time problems persist) instead of the
initial program temperature of 45 °C.
10.8 While (he trap is being desorbed
into the gas chromatograph. empty the
purging chamber using the sample in-
troduction syringe. Wash the chamber
with two 5-mL flushes of reagent
water.
10.9 After desorbing the sample for
four minutes recondition the trap by
returning the purge and trap device to
the purge mode. Wait 1 5 seconds then
close the syringe valve on the purging
dev ce to begin gas flow through the
trap. The trap temperature should be
maintained at 1 80 °C. After approxi-
mately seven minutes turn off the trap
heater and open the syringe valve to
stop the gas flow through the trap.
Wlien cool the trap is ready for th«
next sample.
10.10 The width of the retention
time window used to make identifica-
tions siiouid be based upon measure-
ments of actual retention time variations
of standards over tr>e course of a day.
Three times the standard deviation of •
retention time foi a compound can be
used to calculate a suggested window
Size; however, the experience of the
analyst shou'd wtigh heavily in the
interpretation of chtomatograms.
10.11 If the response for the peak
exceeds the working range of the
system, prepare a dilution of the
sample with reagent water from the
aliquot in the second syringe and
reanalyze.
11. Calculations
11.1 Determine the concentration of
individual compounds in the sample.
11.1.1 If the external standard
calibration procedure is used, calculate
the concentration of material from the
peak response using the calibration
curve or calibration factor determined
in Section 7.3 2.
11.1.2 If the internal standard
calibration procedure was used, calcu-
late the concentration in the sample
using the response factor (RF) deter-
mined in Section 7.4.3 and equation 2.
Eq. 2.
Concentration /jg/L = (A,C,,)/(A,,)(RF|
where:
A, = Resoonse for the parameter to
be measured.
A* * Response for the internal
standard.
C, = Concentration of the internal
standard.
11.2 Report results in micrograms
per liter. When duplicate and spiked
samples are analyzed, report all data
obtained with the sample results.
11.3 For samples processed as part
of a set where the spiked sample
recovery falls outside of the control
limits which were established according
to Section 8.3, data for the affected
parameters must be labeled as suspect.
12. Method Performance
12.1 The method detection limit
(MOD is defined as the minimum
concentration of a substance that can
be measured and reported with 99%
confidence that the value is above
iero.111 The MDL concentrations listed
in Table 1 were obtained using reagent
water."' Similar results were achieved
using representative wastewaters. The
MDL actually achieved in a given
analysis will vary depending on instru-
ment sensitivity and matrix effects.
12.2 This method is recommended
for use in the concentration range from
the MDL up to 1000 x MDL. Direct
aqueous injection techniques should be
used to measure ccncentration levels
above 1000 K MDL.
12.3 In a sioo'e laboratory (Mons-.-n-cT
Rasearchl, using reagent water a>id .
wastewateis spiked at or near back-
ground levels, the average recoveries
presented .n Table 2 were obtained131.
The siandard deviation of the measure-
ment in percent recovery is also
included in Table 2'9'.
12.4 The U.S Environmental
Protection Agency is in th? process of
cnductmg an mterlaboratory method
study to fully define the performance
of this method
References
1 See Appendix A
2. Bellar, T.A., and Lichtenberg. J.J.
Journal American Water Wo.-ks
Association. 66. 739, (19741.
3. Bellar, T.A., and Lichijnberg, J.J.
"Semi-Automated Headspace Analysis
of Drinking Waters and Industrial
Waters for Purgeable Volatile Organic
Compounds." Proceedings from
Symposium on Measurement of
Organic Pollutants in Water and
Wastewater, American Society for
Testing and Materials, STP 686. C.E.
Van Hall, editor. 1978.
4. "Carcinogens —Working Wrth
Carcinogens," Department of Health.
Education, aid Welfare. Public Health
Service, Center for Disease Control,
National Institute for Occupational
Safety end Health, Publication No,
77-206. Aug. 1977.
5. "OSHA Safety and Health Stand-
ards, General Industry." (29 CFR
1910), Occupational Safety and
Health Administration. OSHA 2206.
(Revised. January, 19761.
6. "Safety in Academic Chemistry
Laboratories." American Chemical
Society Publication, Committea on
Chemical Safety. 3rd Edition. 1979.
7. "Handbook for Analytical Quality
Control in Water and Wastewater
Laboratories," EPA-600 4-75-019.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Environmental Monitoring and Support
Laboratory —Cincinnati. Ohio 45268,
March 1979.
8. "Methods 330.4 (Titrimetric. DPD-
FAS) and 330.5 (Souctrophotometric,
DPD) for Chlorine. Tote! Residual."
Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water
and Wastes. EPA 600 4-79-020. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency.
85
-------
Environnrintel Monitoring and Support
Laboratory -Cincinnati, Ohio 45268,
March 1979.
9"FPA Method Validation Studv 23
. £ r f^ IV 1C * ' l»/w VO'tUOtlwfl1 wlU^Jf it v j
Method 601 tPurgcable Haiocarbonsl,"
Report (or EPA Contract 68-03-2856
(In preparation),
Tab!* 1. ChromatO(jfap,i'C Conditions and Method Detection Limits ,
Parameter
ChJorome thane
Bromomethpne
Dichloroditluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
Chloroethene
Methylene chloride
Trichlorolluoromsthans
1, 1 -Dichloroethene
J, 1-Dichloroethane
tranr- t.2~Dichloroethene
Chloroform
1, 2-Dichtoroeihona
1, J, 1 -Trichloroethane
Carbon te'.rachloride
Bromodichtoromethane
1, 2-Dichloropropane
trans- 1,3-Dichloropropene
Tnchloroethene
Dibromochlofiyme:hjne
1. 1.2-Trichhroethane
cis- 1, 3-Dich.'oropropena
2-ChloroethyMnyl ether
Bromoforr.t
1, 1,2.2-Tetrachloroethsne
Tetrach/oroethenn
Chlorobentene
1 , 3-Oichlorobemene
1. 2-Dichlorobemene
1,4-Dich/orobemene
Retention
!min. i
Column 1
1.50
2.17
2.62
2.S7
3.33
5.25
7.18
7.93
9 30
10 1
10.7
11.4
12.6
13.0
13.7
14.3
15.2
15.8
16.5
16.5
16.5
18.0
19.2
21.6
21.7
24.2
34.0
34.9
35.4
Tims
i
)
Cokimn 2
5.26
7.05
nd
S.2B
8.68
10.1
nd
7.72
12.6
9.38
12.1
15.4
13.1
14.4
14.6
16.6
76.6
13.1
16.6
18.1
18.0
nd
19.2
nd
15.0
13.8
22.4
23.5
22.3
Method
Detect ion Limit
Ite'L ._
O.OC
1.18
t.Cl
0.18
0.52
0.25
net
0.13
0.07
0.10
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.12
0.10
0.04
0.34
0.12
0.09
0.02
020
0.13
0.20
O.Oj
0.03
0.25
032
O.'S
0.24
nd * not determined
Column 1 conditions: Carbopack 8 60/80 mesh coated with 1 % SP-1000 pt eked in
en 8 ft x 0.1 in ID stainless steel or glass column with helium currier ges it 40
mL/min flowrate. Column temperature hnld at 45"C for 3 min. then programmed
»t 8 °C/min. to 220° and held for 15 rr/in.
Column 2 conditions: Porssil-C 10O/120 mesh coated with n-octane packed in a 6 ft
x 0.1 in IO stainless steel or glass column with helium carrier gas at 40 mL/min
flow rate. Column temperature held at 50"C for 3 m:n then programmed at
6 "C/min to 170" «nd held for 4 min.
86
-------
'Tab/* 2. Sing,',- Op *n, tor A ccurtc y and Prt-c.sion
A v triage
Percent
Parameter
Bromodicrtlorometha',ii
Bromolorm
Bromomethsne
Carbon tetrach/oride
Chlorobentene
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Chloromethane
Dibromoch/oromethane
1.2-Dichlorobement
1, 3-Dich/orobemene
1. 4-Dichlorobentena
Dichlorodif/uoromelha ~>e
1, 1 -Dichloroethane
1.2-Oichloroethane
1, 1 -D'Chloroethene
trans- 1.2-Dichlo:oethene
1. 2-Dichloropropane
cis- 1. 3-Oichloropropene
trans- 7 ,3-Dich/oropropene
Methylene chloride
1. 1.2.2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrach/oroethene
1. 1. 1 -Trichloroethane
1. 1,2-Trich/oroethane
Trichlc -oethene
Trichlo. jfluoromethane
Vinyl chloride
Standard
Deviation
Recovery %
1OO.
89
105.
82.
93.
91.
96.
101.
91.
98.
9
5
0
5
9
5
3
7
4
3
10.20
91.
97.
6
5
87.8
102.
97.
101.
91.
97.
86.
73.
97.
9;.
94.
75.
91.
106.
UP
8
1
0
7
7
5
9
9
1
1
0
1
89.3
101.
9
5.
9
17.
25.
8.
22.
9.
20.
13.
6.
2.
4.
9.
id.
5.
4.
21.
19.
8.
0
O
3
6
9
4
9
6
4
5
0
3
3
0
5
8
7
3
8
6.0
17.
2.
15.
18.
12.
25.
7.
13.
11.
2
6
0
1
5
1
**
3
4
0
f.
3
Range
(ug_^U
43-46.
45-50
39-49.
of Matix
Analyse:, T//ues
7
2
0. 55-50
2.
21-50
3.95-50
4.
0.
39-133
44-50
0.55-23.
0.
4.
2.
2.
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
O.
0.
0.
0.
0.
75-93.
9
0
89-154
94-46.
99-51.
7
6
18-43.4
44-46.
44-46.
37 50
44-98.
29-39.
44-46.
43-50
73-46.
46-46.
50-35.
37-29.
45-50
38-46.
7
7
0
0
7
7
7
0
0
7
149
0.
82-32.
3
J?
20
21
19
20
21
20
20
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
21
19
20
21
21
20
21
21
21
21
21
21
14
21
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
Optional
foam ,
Tree (
I
\
2 .ft
~
Inl
•
r/r Vt in.
O.D.
14mm
O.D.
'et Vt in.
O.D.
Sample Inlet
•— 2-wty Syringe vulva
20 giuge syringe needle
O.O. Rubber Septum
_ 10mm O.O. '/,, in. O.O.
— Inlet ^/'Stainless Stutt
Vt in. O.O.
N.
13X molecular
sieve purge
ges filter
Purga get
flow control
10mm glass frit
medium porosity
Flgur* 1. Purging davica
87
-------
Pacing crocrdurn
Construction
• per_zx \rvTtijst e j -itij/i liiiuij/
Class 5/nm p) 7"^ foot f LLj.'"""" nut and ftrrulss
- I
Activated 7.7cm
charcoal
Grade IS
Silica gel 7.7cr
n
7
•
Tenax 7.7cm
3% OV-1 ,cm
Glass
wool 5mm
»•(
/'
'•'••'.
^
\
vv
^
-.
.;-.
-
— '
w/V» wrtpped
solid -err^
-r
(Double layer} ; ^ j--*'
^— -*^' controller
°£L, — sensor
'5C"H 3t
^ '^"^
CVy ^x^'"
7-*/foot T . C' /
/••*/sf«ncff
w/>« wrapped
solid
(Single layer)
8cm —
--^ /
Electronic
temperature
control
end
pyrometer
'-, Tubing 25 cm.
^ — ^ / o. ro5 //T. /.o.
- ^ / 0. J25 in O.D.
,- — -^ y' stainless steel
I fS=Pl
_J I ii_AJ
Trap inlet
Figure 2. Trap packings and construction to include desorb capability
Carrier gas flow control
Pressure regulator
iJS
Purge ges
flow control N
13X rrohcular
sieve titter
Liquid injection ports
Column oven
,-— Confirmatory column
-Analytical column
optional 4-port column
6-port selection valvt
valve , Trap inlet
Resistance wire
.Trap fO)T
control
Purging
device
Nott:
AH lines between
trap end GC
should be heeled
Figure 3. Schematic of purge and trap device — purge mode
88
-------
• Carrier gas flow control Liquid injection ports - ,
x-.^_ -, Column oven
V- • V4 --a J. t \"
rt-gvlntor \ - A J^.,». --^ - '. | ^._ Csr.tirrratt.rf column
;.-}"" "*J~.-"_ | f- To detector
il column
Purge gas
tlo * control *"
13X molecular
sieve filter
6-port
optional 4-port c
selection
j Resistance wire
/ \,. L ^Hester control
-/ - •*>
. Or,
:.^4—J
Purging
' device
Note:
All lines between
trap and GC
sh'ju/d be heated
tc, 80° C
F gur» 4. Schematic o! putgt and trap device — desorb mode
Column: J% SP-1000 on Carbopack-8
Program: 45°C-3 minutes. 8*/minute to 220"C
Detactor; Ha/I 700-A electiolyti'c conductivity
02 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36
Retention time, minutes
Figure 6. Cat chromntogrim of purgseb/e ht/ocarbons
89
-------
APPENDIX B
ADDITIONAL NOTES ON METHOD 601 SENT TO PARTICIPATING
LABORATORIES FOR FRESTCJDY CONFERENCE ANALYSES
90
-------
ADDITIONAL NOTZS ON METHOD 601
5.2 Appropriate purge/trap samples are those such as the
Hewlett Packard with up to a 15 ml purging vessel or the
Tekmar with 5 ml purging vessel. Do not use Tekmar with
25 mL purging vessel.
5.3 Acceptable detectors are the Hall, Coulsen, and Dohrman
detectors. Electron capture is not considered halide
specific!
5.8 A 10 to 15 ml screw-cap is acceptable. We have found
a 10 mL to be preferable.
6.2/ Any sodium thiosulfate needed in the wastewater samples
9.2 has already been added by MRC.
6.3 The trap for this study must contain all four of the
specified materials. Any lab having difficulty obtain-
ing the specified silica gel or coconut charcoal may
request a sample from MRC. Also, traps containing the
specified materials are available from Tekmar.
6.5.2.2 Note, if chloroethane is purchased as a liquid, the
container must be cooled in dry ice before opening
since its boiling point is 3°C.
7. Note, all standards and samples are to be analyzed by
purge/trap. Determination of purging efficiency, or
recovery by direct injection is not required for this
study. Method precision and sensitivity limits will
be determined by multiple laboratory results and do
not need to be determined by individual laboratories.
91
-------
7.4.3 Reference to section 10.6 in the method should he 1&.4.
8.5 Standard quality assurance practices should be used.
In the conduct of this work, it is recorrmended that a
blank and a thiee point calibration curve be analyzed
on the first day. On following days, a blank and one
point should be sufficient if the point falls wi hin
10% of the previously generated calibration curve.
8.6 For the purposes of this study do not add surrogate
compounds. The three mixes have been selected to
optimize separation between the peaks, without con-
sideration of surrogate compounds.
9.2 Samples should be refrigerated until analysis.
9.3 Delete.
10.4 Delete last sentence concerning surrogates.
10.8 We recommend a minimum of three washes.
10.1 The column packing material must be Carbopack B 60/80
mesh coated with 1% SP-1000 in an 8 foot by 0.1 inch
(or 2 mm) ID column.
Note: Any type of mechanical shock may damage the
packing material (cracking the packing material and
producing fines). The instructions included in the
Carbopack should be followed to avoid this problem
when packing your own columns. This problem may re-
sult in plugged columns, decreased separation effi-
ciency and/or a dirty furnace in the detector.
92
-------
11.2 No duplicates will be run.
Table 1 - The samples may be analyzed by following the temperature
programming as indicated except hold for 15 min. o_r until all com-
pounds are eluted.
93
-------
APPENDIX C
RAW DATA: METHOD 601
94
-------
TABLE 18. RAW DATA FOR TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE ANALYSIS BY WATER TYPE
vD
en
DISTILLED WATER
TAP WATER
LOW fOUDEN PAIH, UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE HATER WASTE WATER 1
AMPUL HO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
1
8.00
10.10
7.35
1.41*
8.89
*
5.71
7.77
11.90
5.37
1.94
4.14
7.98
19.00*
5.09
7.03
12.60
4.23
3.30
5.81
5.97
2
10.00
11.70
8.11
1.96*
12.30
*
6.95
10.90
13.00
5.60
13.70
6.29
11.00
14.80
8.03
8.i7
12.40
5.30
3.09
7.30
8.18
1
8.00
8.96
*. 69
1.51*
8.15
*
5.14
5.86
8.41
4.82
1.61
5.34
8.51
15.90*
4.32
3.24
10.30
4.00
0.94
5.80
7.30
2
10.00
11.20
7.92
1.86*
10.80
*
7.63
9.12
7.00
7.42
9.38
4.41
11.70
11. bO
7.96
5.07
10.90
5.70
1.41
10.20
9.48
1
8.00
7.72
6.62
1.06*
7.52
*
5.36
5.83
8.53
5.12
2.94
6.38
4.37
16.30*
6.21
5.33
8.83
4.35
4.99
10.00
6.54
2
10.00
11.80
8.87
1.40*
8.19
*
7.97
9.45
11.50
7.34
18.20*
7.00
8.30
11.20
9.08
6.56
11.60
6.00
6.04
12.20
8.79
1
8.00
8.52
6.87
9.00
8.85
*
7.42
8.68
3.36
5.30
1.66
5.47
11.20
18.00*
6.54
4.35
6.31
5.60
3.03
10.60
6.93
2
10.00
11.20
8.36
0.00*
12.40
*
8.47
9.34
7.45
7.15
12.50
8.06
12.30
8.00
7.77
5.70
12.20
6.80
2.94
11.40
8.90
WASTE WATER 2
1
8.00
8.95
4.78
0.82*
7.90
*
7.14
7.46
3.84
3.81
1.86
4.52
8.33
7.65
5.53
4.29
7.91
70
39
70
WASTE WATER 3
7.94*
2
10.00
10.40
7.6?
1.39*
11.20
*
9.00
8.64
5.53
5.54
12.70
5.76
12.10
9.04
7.78
6.15
0.00*
6.00
6.33
9.58
10.90*
1
8.00
9.90
7.94
1.07*
8.26
•
7.43
7.16'
3.43
3.05
1.59
3.83
8.09
7.12
7.93
4.75
6.83
*
2.59
12.10
6.98
2
10.00
0.00*
8.50
0.74*
11.00
*
8.54
10.20
3.17
5.49
14.20
'>.72
6.62
8.17
8.92
6.18
5.33
7.00
3.54
1H. 50*
6,74
-------
TABLE 18 (continued)
cr»
DISTILLED HATES
MEDIUM YCUDEN PA1K. UNITS - UG/L
TAP WATER SURFACE WATER WASTE WATER 1
WASTE WATER 2
WASTE WATER 3
AMPUL RO:
TRUE COKC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
3
40.00
SI. 10
34.50
4.97*
33.80
*
37.90
43.10
23.50
28.30
49.40
39.60
48.60
40.10
33.20
30.60
34.90
40.00
34.80
24.70
37.90
4
50.00
43.90
44.30
8.81*
40.60
*
46.40
54.00
32.60
42.40
56.20
40.50
39.50
54.70
31.60
38.70
«5.90
48.90
40.70
35.60
49.30
3
40.00
SI. 40
29.90
6.11*
35.30
*
35.90
44.90
29.80
28.40
49.00
33.80
35.80
48.10
14.00
27.00
0.00*
43.20
39.40
40.20
4.73
4
50.00
52.50
40.50
8.47*
49.90
*
51.40
48.50
39.00
38.80
58.30
36.40
67.40
53.60
31.90
33.00
45.00
61.90
39.90
49.70
65.40
3
40.00
41.00
34.40
6.12*
36.40
«
36.50
37.70
23.40
29.80
44.50
37.90
39.10
48.70
36.60
27.70
42.00
40.40
35.40
31.10
41.40
4
50.00
50.80
39.00
3.47*
44.90
t
55.00
58.20
25.20
57.50
49.90
45.30
46.70
55.90
37.50
34.20
60.80
55.70
48.60
47.60
50.10
3
40.00
40.30
28.10
84,50*
40.00
*
37.10
42.50
20.10
34.80
54.70
37.30
21.20
39.00
34.20
28.00
44.20
45.00
27.80
51.80
38.60
4
50.00
50.50
44.10
4.45*
42.60
•
60.00
58.00
30.30
38.40
45. CO
46.90
78.70
58.40
44.90
34.10
58.20
49.00
48.30
59.50
60.50
3
40.00
39.70
33.80
4.73*
39.43
*
39.40
39.30
15.80
33.30
50.80
33.80
25.10
51.90
35.70
26.60
0.00*
38.30
28.10
47.50
46.00*
4
50.00
47.80
39.60
5.07*
47.90
*
54.30
39.10
23.80
41.80
51.40
36.10
21.80
44.80
44.60
30.40
0.00*
55.20
39.90
47.60
62.50*
3
40.00
45.00
30.70
5.05*
41.80
4
22.90
48.70
19.00
32.30
46.30
34.40
21.10
38.40
31.30
28.60
51.90
45.00
32.10
49.70
33.70
4
50.00
55.30
43.80
6.60*
52.10
»
56.40
51.20
37.00
40.90
66.00
42.40
71.50
bO.SO
39.00
33.90
55.00
59.00
40,00
65.30
43.20
-------
TABLE 18 (continued)
vO
AMPUL HO:
THUE CONC:
UB N'JMBEK
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
16
19
20
DISTILLED WATEH
TAP WATEH
HIGH YOUDEN PAIK, UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATEH WASTE WATEH 1
WASTE WATER 3
5
400.00
362.00
331.00
152.00*
403.00
*
494.00
465.00
235.00
542.00
264.00
309.00
589.00
304.00
339.00
378.00
156.00
219.00
343.00
277.00
389.00
6
499.00
516.00
482.00
185.00*
465.00
*
395.00
560.00
335.00
706.00
283.00
493.00
672.00
459.00
196.00
648.00
171.00
177.00
471.00
299.00
524.00
5
400.00
256.00
354.00
160.00*
331.00
*
508.00
508.00
266.00
525.00
245.00
310.00
358.00
357.00
244.00
313.00
171.00
191.00
389.00
308.00
522.00
6
499.00
549.00
507.00
184.00*
458.00
4
440.00
545.00
344.00
711.00
262.00
488.00
745.00
437.00
404.00
432.00
185.00
215.00
527.00
314.00
699.00
b
400.00
438.00
346.00
151.00*
452.00
*
505.00
415.00
245.00
533.00
235.00
3b7.00
519.00
360.00
336.00
333.00
177.00
233.00
453.00
324.00
411.00
6
499.00
574.00
509.00
167.00*
564.00
*
411.00
569.00
330.00
680.00
232.00
519.00
719.00
466.00
411.00
550.00
184.00
288.00
824.00
330.00
542.00
5
400.00
313.00
367.00
129.00
427. CO
*
515.00
451.00
276.00
481.00
254.00
344.00
647.00
358.00
327.00
350.00
167.00
161.00
389.00
337.00
517.00
6
499. OU
341.00
498.00
142.00
508.00
*
493.00
563.00
362.00
770.00
292.00
537.00
879.00
452.00
466.00
617.00
0.00*
178.00
643.00
369.00
659.00
5
400.00
352.00
388.00
133.00*
411.00
*
508.00
527.00
287.00
579.00
296.00
332.00
492.00
298.00
329.00
330.00
0.00*
166.00
413.00
317.00
526.00*
6
499.00
480.00
514.00
170.00*
595.00
*
439.00
545.00
395.00
692.00
255.00
479.00
859.00
479.00
427.00
551.00
187.00
181.00
506.00
355.00
654.00*
5
400.00
173.00
387.00
134.00*
423.00
*
523.00
493.00
499.00
527.00
274.00
342.00
571.00
395.00
320.00
387.00
164.00
197.00
406.00
302.00
372.00
6
499.00
308.00
473.00
174.00*
616.00
*
480.00
532.00
416.00
833.00
295.00
495.00
785.00
434,00
439.00
627.00
184.00
206.00
522.00
395.00
486.00
-------
TABLE 19. RAW DATA FOR CHLOROMETHANE ANALYSIS BY WATER TYPE
CD
AMPUL NO:
TROE COHC:
LAB NUMBER
i
2
3
4
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
DISTILLED UATEK
TAP HATER
LOU YOUOEN PAIR. UNITS - UG/L
SUKFACE WATER HASTE HATER 1
WASTE HATER 2
HASTE HATER 3
1
8.00
7.41
4.22
o.;3
5.39
62.50*
0.00*
10.60
1.41
7.35
38.30*
2.85
4.07
13.30
10.60
0.00*
17.30
0.00*
3.05
4. BO
1.94
2
10.00
10.10
4.92
0.85
7.77
0.00*
0.00*
12.60
3.27
5.96
10.00
9.92
6.69
10.80
13.60
0.00*
18,70
0.00*
2.25
4.97
3.07
1
8.00
6.22
5.04
0.88
6.24
4.46
0.00*
10.30
5.45
5.48
57.20*
0.00*
5.07
11.90
17.50
0.00*
12.50
0.00*
1.99
5.23
1.12
2
10.00
12.20
6.58
.0.72
7.44
4.49
0.00*
il.10
10.20
6.32
46.90*
3.07
2.09
15.50
11.50
0.00*
16.80
0.00*
2.52
6.06
0.81
1
8.00
5.13
6.03
0.22
5.04
0.00*
0.00*
9.63
6.44
5.24
3.23
0.00*
2.61
4.20
11.60
0.00*
11,20
0.00*
1,70
4.25
3.97
2
10.00
9.93
7.91
0.46
6.17
0.00*
0.00*
11.20
9.31
8.42
18.30
6.87
3.41
12.80
14.50
0.00*
16.10
0.00*
2.27
6.03
2.56
1
8.00
8.69
8.83
0.47
5.36
0.00*
0.00*
10.80
0.82
5.44
8.53
1.34
2.92
12.20
9.05
0.00*
10.90
0.00*
2.44
7.57
20.90
£
10.00
10.00
10.70
0.63
7.76
4.35
0.00*
11.20
4.36
7.16
2.82
8.78
2.90
26.80*
12,60
0.00*
16.40
0.00*
6.52
8.12
5.15
1
8.00
5.81
4.47
0.24
5.33
0.00*
0.00*
10.20
2.78
2.15
20.30
0.81
2.96
2.23
10.10
0.00*
14.30
0.00*
1.58
6.41
10.20
2
10.00
12.90
6.68
16.10
7.36
0.00*
0.00*
12.00
2.54
5.00
?.80
5.18
3.72
12.20
11.50
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
1.97
5.42
7.46
1
8.00
12.30
5.01
19.20
0.50
14.40
0.00*
6.50
0.00*
8.65
2.25
16.10*
12.80
0.00*
7.60
74.90»
24.10
0.00*
0.00*
10.30
o.co*
2
10.00
4.12
3.73
12.30
7.90
40.70
0.00*
11.80
2.71
11.10
12.10
14.00*
1*.60
54.70
10.80
96.10*
50.50
OoOO*
0.00s
11.80
1.60
-------
TABLE 19 (continued)
-------
TABLE 1C (continued)
o
o
01 STILLED MATEH
TAP WfcTER
HIGH YOUDEN PAIR. UNITS - UG/L
SUKFACE MATER WASTE WATER 1
WASTE WATER I
WASTE WATER 3
AMPUL HO:
TRUE COftC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
S
$
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
13
19
20
$
399. 00
298.00
135.00
377.00
234.00
178.00
0.00*
439.00
173.00
516.00
1860,00*
465.00
211.00
310.00
560.00
287.00
250.00
0.00*
311.00
154.00
133.00
6
499.00
400.00
223.00
242.00
344.00
453.00
0.00*
609.00
283.00
635.00
2232.00*
679.00
77.70
524.00
502.00
410.00
298.00
0.00*
465.00
193.00
239.00
5
399.00
239.00
340.00
181.00
265.00
264.00
0.00*
402.00
217.00
493.00
1070.00*
593.00
60.70
375.00
529.00
316,00
296.00
0.00*
375.00
188.00
430.00
6
499.00
466.00
498.00
226.00
360.00
276.00
0,00*
467.00
298.00
570.00
2800.00*
774.00
329.00
583.00
455.00
413.00
352.00
0.00*
701.00
202.00
795.00
5
399.00
387.00
277,00
360.00
320.00
478.00
0.00*
422.00
187.00
447.00
925.00
567.00
167.00'
327.00
551.00
410.00
320.00
0.00*
101.00
244.00
602.00
6
499.00
518.00
416.00
213.00
397.00
359.00
0.00*
474.00
286.00
597.00
3190.00*
789.00
266.00
598.00
553.00
515.00
334.00
0.00*
379.00
267.00
1060.00*
5
399.00
435.00
263.00
280.30
306.00
419.00
0.00*
375.00
212.00
367. OC
829.00*
453.00
463.00
371.00
173.00
389.00
300.00
0.00*
611.00
284. CO
340.00
6
499.00
471.00
331.00
297.00
413.00
30$. 00
0.00*
517.00
300.00
659.00
637.00
731.00
613.00
514.00
413.00
582.00
303.CU
0.00*
863.00
319.00
4/4.00
5
399.00
432.00
233.00
88.00
250.00
105.00
0.00*
478.00
200.00
305.00
2100.00*
499.00
0* ~-
. w«/
67.70
297.00
323.00
269.00
0.00*
424.00
231.00
665.00
6
499.00
596.00
338.00
344.00
408.00
168.00
0.00*
559.00
305.00
546.00
1770.00*
610.00
28.00
142.00
598.00
435.00
341.00
0.00*
551.00
313.00
844.00
5
399. OQ
2S6.00
227.00
241.00
286.00
184.00
0.00*
407.00
393.00
474.00
1150,00*
474.00*
122.00
457.00
310.00
590.00*
317. OC
0.00*
370.00
191.00
285.00
6
479.00
560.00
248.00
339.00
402.00
274.00
0.00*
511.00
344.00
652.00
1910,00*
894.00*
435.00
380.00
533.00
983.00*
340.00
0.00*
483.00
315.00
467.00
-------
TABLE 20. RAW DATA FOR VINYL CHLORIDE ANALYSIS BY WATER TYPE
DISTILLED WATER
TAP UATEH
LOW YOUDEN PMK. UNITS - UG/L
SUKf'ACE WATER HASTE MATER 1
AMPUL NO:
TKUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
$
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
2U
1
8.00
8.37
6.92
11.10*
7.12
6.01
0.00*
9.72
12.90*
10.30
8.10
5.83
4.91
12.10
6.89
f,67
10.80
*
4.37
4.80
b.36
2
10.00
11.70
8.24
17.90*
9.89
9.17
0.00*
14.50
39.10*
9.38
17.40
9.60
7.36
10.90
9.79
7.54
12.10
*
3.41
6.53
7.74
1
tt.OO
8.01
6.59
12.70*
8.56
6.01
0.00*
7.49
6.44
7.02
8.17
6.11
5.62
10.30
8.80
6.03
0.00*
*
1.21
6.74
2.62
2
10.00
10.90
8.47
17.90*
11.20
7.92
0.00*
9.03
8.13
10.40
13.80
8.38
5.96
12.30
8.62
8.43
6.91
*
1.59
9.21
5.24
1
8.00
6.90
6.72
11.10
b.91
6.43
0,00*
7.46
7.42
6.24
10.40
7.45
5.95
10.30
8.90
7.37
3.67
*
2.86*
6.91
2.86
2
10.00
12.20
9.31
14.10
8.79
10.70
0.00*
13.60
8.45
14.90
15.20
8.83
8.08
11.50
11.40
9.81
3.72
*
3.65*
8.27
5.12
1
8.00
7.60
7.56
6.83
8.37
6.10
o.ou*
11.20*
3.41
17.90*
6.20
7.13
6.18
11.90
4.44
5.88
4.87
*
0.96
9.23
6.99
2
10.00
10.80
8.'i8
3.47
10.80
7.67
0.00*
12.30*
27.60*
9.50
13.90
9.60
5.61
12.60
li.20
8.58
6.96
*
1.36
9.31
8.41
WASTE WATER 2
HASTE WATER 3
1
8.00
3.88
5.75
6.06
7.<1
5.71
0.00*
9.89*
4.15
5.38
8.10
6.89
5.78
8.66
7.33
5.52
11.70
4
3.00
4.95
7.60
2
10.00
11.90
8.51
13.60
10.00
8.07
0.00*
12.70*
4.38
7.45
16.20
8.26
8.06
11.80
11.70
7.34
1.63
4
3,94
4.95
10.20
1
8.00
8,08
6.96
7.78
8.54
9.99
0.00*
11.90
6.91
4.01
7.61
6.97
5.11
8.23
9.12
0.00*
2.50*
2.06
11.60
5.49
2
10.00
7.08
8.53
14.20
11.90
15.50
0.00'
11.60
6.91
7.80
19.60
9.38
14.10
12.20
10.80
9.43
0.00'
2.73
24.10
7.17
-------
TABLE 20 (continued)
o
CO
DISTILLED WATER
MEOIW YOUDEN PMR, UNITS - UG/L
TAP UATEH SURFACE MATER WASTE WATER 1
WASTE WATER 2
WASTE WATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE COMC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
XI
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
3
4C.OO
26.90
39.20
40.10*
34.40
36.00
0.00*
66.80*
44.10*
42.10
48.80
42.10
34.60
38.40
41.00
41.70
31.50
*
28.10
35.30
27.40
4
50.00
20.50
48.70
68.90»
44.50
45. 7U
0.00*
60.10
70.30*
56.00
60.10
58.70
- 18.30
46.50
48.80
55.30
47.50
*
37.90
37,30
33.30
3
40.00
30.20
33.90
44.10*
34.60
40.50
0.00*
63.10
69.00
46.40
47.60
47.40
37.10
42.70
37.50
43.10
34. 2U
*
29.00
35.30
25.80
4
50.00
28.30
46.10
72.70*
51.40
44.70
0.00*
70.40
87.40
52.40
61.60
59.90
47.90
50.20
50.50
58.10
39.30
*
41.30
45.60
30.00
3
40.00
23.80
40.20
50.10
40.60
34.90
0.00*
52.40
48.30
52.50
43.20
49.80
21.40
42.40
43.80
45.30
38.90
*
18.50*
37.10
Z9.10
4
50.00
41.40
44.70
27.60
47.10
40.50
0.00*
80.60
63. SO
53.40
50.50
63.60
31.40
43.60
52.50
55.90
67.80
*
25.20*
27.90
38.30
3
40.00
39.70
38.40
9.02*
42.40
38.90
0.00*
b6.10*
67.10*
47.30
48.10
52.00
32.30
40.10
46.80
49.40
38.10
*
32.30
48.00
37.60
4
50.00
52,80
50.20
44.70
43.90
49.00
O.OU*
72.70*
71.60
62.90
45.60
66.00
16,80*
55.80
52.10
63.90
66.10
*
45.20
46.70
41.00
3
40.00
35.00
41.00
34.30
42.30
38.90
0.00*
64.50*
24.40
54.40
49.90
49.80
11.60
37.80
35.80
44.40
30.00
ft
33.20
31.50
29.30
4
50.00
44.00
45.70
53.10
51.10
*7.60
0.00*
63.40*
38.60
59.40
70.60
59.50
16.20
45.60
46.40
48.40
39.90
*
45.30
27,90
45.10
3
40.00
44.80
35.30
46.70
41.40
48.60
0.00*
57.70
43.20
S0.3il
49.20
48.20
17.00*
39.60
50.40
50.30
29.20*
4
28.20
i8.60
38.20
4
50.00
63.50
51.50
63.40
52.50
59.10
0.00*
*2.SO
58.10
62.30
46.90
64.40
55.80
53.30
53.80
57.40
51.90*
*
37.10*
55.40
51. 3C
-------
TABLE 20 (continued)
o
OJ
DISTILLED WATER
TAP WATER
HIUH YOUUEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATER WASTE UATER 1
WASTE WATER I
WASTE WATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB HUM3ER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
IB
19
20
b
4D1.00
456.00
396.00
720.00*
380.00
408.00
0.00*
541.00
768.00*
814.00*
308.00
617.00
330.00
375.00
480.00
412.00
309.00
*
372.00
302.00
338.00
6
500.00
52Z.OO
498.00
906.00*
455.00
527.00
0.00*
677.00
1176.00*
1026.00
315.00
744.00
170.00
598.00
550.00
544.00
327.00
*
480.00
313.00
468.00
5
401.00
314.00
428.00
789.00*
381.00
369.00
0.00*
628.00
998.00*
702.00
270.00
573.00
139.00
461.00
507.00
389.00
225.00
#
466.00
335.00
383.00
6
500.00
776.00
540.00
856.00*
457.00
436.00
0.00*
655.00
1212.00*
983.00
298.00
703.00
435.00
580.00
523.00
464.00
258.00
*
584.00
328.00
480.00
5
401.00
547.00
416.00
762. UU
444.00
318.00
0.1)0*
591.00
784.00
682.00
283.00
595.00
277.00
455.00
513.00
479.00
244.00
*
311.00*
334. UO
388.00
6
500.00
689.00
562.00
743.00
526.00
515.00
0.00*
629.00
1205.00
920.00
313.00
789.00
378.00
629.00
544.00
575.00
257.00
*
442. OU*
331.00
467.00
5
401.00
591.00
459.00
590.00
444.0')
400.00
0.00*
495.00*
982.00*
688.00
248.00
558.00
480.00
448.00
456.00
459.00
249.00
*
527.00
369.00
368.00
6
500.00
594.00
546.00
539,00
548.00
634. UO
0.00*
707.00*
1211.00*
973.00
335.00
807.00
573,00
601.00
592.00
623.00
218.00
*
609.00
391.00
454.00
5
401.00
628.00
462.00
607.00
437.00
406.00
0.00*
612,00*
939.00
687.00
338.00
554.00
153.00
414.00
421.00
399.00
197.00
*
471.00
307. CO
468. CO
6
500.00
401.00
564.00
77U.OO
546.00
474.00
0.00*
674.00*
1253.00
991.00
320.00
817.00
135.00
616.00
549.00
492.00
251.00
*
640.00
388.00
608.00
5
401.00
404.00
433.00
465.00
422.00
311.00
0.00*
603.00
1756.00*
762.00
312.00
558.00
230.00
506.00
432.00
•J46.00
211.00*
*
454.00
316.00
496.00
6
500.00
308.00
504.00
752.00
540.00
476.00
0.00
710.00
1499.00
941.00
320.00
746.00
489.00
614.00
555.00
500.00
244.0i?
561.00
d33.00
576.00
-------
TABLE 21. RAW DATA FOR TRANS-l,2-DTCHLOROETHENE ANALYSIS BY WATER TYPE
M
O
DISTILLED WATER
AMPUL NO:
THUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
1
8.00
9.32
8.78
8.74
6.40
2.64
6.43
11.30
27.50*
7.70
4.80
5.24
5.66
8.55
7.86
8.70
12.20
6.70
4.98
6.78
6.51
2
10. 00
10.70
9.99
10.30
8.72
3.68
7.50
13.00
19.90
7.73
20.70
7.48
7.73
9.58
10.20
10.90
11.90
6.00
4.00
9.29
7.92
TAP WATEK
LOW YOUDEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATEH WASTE WATEK 1
WASTE WATER 2
WASTE WATEH 3
1
8.00
7.01
7.23
6.27
7.70
6.89
6.43
9.69
8.37
3.19
4.72
3.25
0.00*
8.36
8.59
7.4i
14.50
4.80
0.00*
6.86
0.11
2
10.50
10.20
8.84
7.86
10.10
' 9.42
8.25
10.10
9.33
4.72
20.60*
4.08
0.00*
11.60
8.49
9.76
9.15
6.20.
0.00*
12.20
0.11*
1
8.00
8.71
8.44
7.16
7.55
12.00
6.50
9.61
7.42
7,00
1.09
6.53
6.73
8.69
10.60
8.28
6.22
5.30
4.04
8.24
2.44
2
10.00
11.80
10.60
«.39
9.32
10.60
8.42
10.70
10.30
9.22
22.80*
7,74
8.43
9.91
12.10
10.90
8.12
7.90
5.38
9.97
11.40
1
8.00
4.06
7.00
4.25
3.17
8.46
8.14
10.30
3.74
4.41
6.31
5.68
6.13
8.84
7.23
8.91
4.46
6.60
3.82*
11.60
2.22
2
10.00
7.35
8.53
4.17
4.19
11.40
10.20
11. 60
9.08
5.91
14.20
7.17
7.47
11.60
8.64
11.40
8.52
8.40
4.96*
13.40
5.68
1
8.00
10.60
6.23
3.69
8.57
11.20
7.64
10.30
11.20*
5.90
4.75
7.98
6.86
8.68
7.80
8.51
6.92
5.90
1.36
11.30
6.80
2
10.00
11.00
8.65
6.30
10.70
15.40
10.30
10.80
19.30*
8.28
18.30
8.95
8.50
10.90
10,10
11.00
8.14
8.00
2.14
11.40
10.40
1
8.00
13.40
6.69
5.24
7.36
22.10*
8.14
10.50
3.56
5.21
5.90
4.67
0.00*
9.24
9.49
9.27
7.14
6.70
2.42
13.00
2.15
2
10.00
8.94
8.09
4.23
8.87
42.10*
10.00
12.20
5.88
6.26
18,50
5.68
0.00*
11.90
12.80
11.50
9.73
9.40
0.00*
12.60
3.03
-------
TABLE 21 (continued)
DISTILLED WATER
MEDIUM YUUUEN PAIK. UNITS - UG/L
TAP WATEH SUHFACE WATEK WASTE WATER 1
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
It)
19
20
3
40. 00
61.90*
37.70
32.20
33.70
44.30
38.90
36.10
38.30
34.10
84.90*
34.00
34.90
40.20
42.00
45.60
39.00
38.40
40.60
40.20
34.10
4
50.00
48.20
47.10
52.90
42.90
56.10
46.30
40.40
51.10
54.90
103.80*
45.50
51.00
53.60
52.30
56.40
54.20
55.80
49.40
61.40
43.80
3
40.00
59.30
33.00
28.70
34.00
36.20
38.30
25.60
50.60
27.80
81.70*
31.70
30.40
43.00
43.70
45.40
43.60
29.70
0.00*
52.40
62.80
4
50.00
50.00
42.50
44.10
46.30
42.10
48.80
31.70
70.60
31.80
93.90*
42.30
39.30
51.40
48.90
59.40
50.20
58.80
0.00*
67.40
48.50
3
40.00
49.40
38.40
40.20
40.90
43.90
38.30
24.70
50.10
38.70
80.00*
39.80
27.30
44.80
43.90
50.50
49.10
43.00
33.10
42.60
42.30
4
50.00
61.20
47.80
23.30
49.50
54.90
50.00
38.90
55.30
al.80
86.90
51.70
34.90
48.30
55.60
58.30
67.70
61.00
43.40
56.60
49.80
3
40.00
47.60
25.40
19.30
37.70
44.90
40.00
32.10
39.00
30.60
113.00'
38.60
47.10
31.90
36.60
46.80
47.80
50.00
12.50'
60.80
56.40
HASTE WATER 2
WASTE
4
50.00
42.30
46.50
29.90
43.10
57.20
54.40
43.20
57.80
36.20
73.90
53.10
57.10
58.40
44.40
60.40
66.70
53.00
32.00*
66.00
70.10
3
40.00
50.70
44.30
29.60
42.90
39.60
41.10
31.20
44.40*
42.30
86.90*
38.00
42.30
46.00
35.10
44.20
39.60
38.00
36.80
56.80
46.60
4
50.00
53.90
46.70
40.20
53.00
64.60
52.50
32.00
68.10*
50.70
110.00*
47.40
163.00*
51.40
46.60
54.20
48.20
56.00
47.50
56.60
56.30
3
40.00
52.10
32.30
22.50
37.30
63.90*
27.80
28.40
25.30
28.20
75.60
34.50
34.60
40.40
27.40
49.20
64.40
42.00
52.30
57.20
37.70
4
50.00
73.80
44.30
34.70
48.00
71.70*
53.80
38.10
64.90
42.50
76.70
45.50
50.30
102.00*
62.20
60.90
64.40
53.00
45.90
75.00
52.30
-------
TABLE 21 (continued)
M
O
DISTILLED WATEK
TAP WATEK
HIGH KOUOEN PAIH, UNITS - WJ/L
SURFACE WATEK WASTE WATEH 1
WASTE WATEK 2
WASTE WATER 3
AMPUL MO:
TKUE CONC:
LAB NUMBEH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
5
400.00
376.00
348.00
388.00
384.00
380. CO
400.00
541.00
385.00
510.00
468,00
367.00
314.00
341.00
366.00
400.00
200.00
372.00
490.00
32b.OO
381.00
6
500.00
547.00
452.00
498.00
462.00
513.00
121.00
743.00
451.00
591.00
501.00
494.00
401.00
483.00
398.00
583.00
219.00
410.00
566.00
340.00
485.00
5
400.00
359.00
344.00
408.00
379.00
337.00
433.00
526.00
386.00
414.00
460.00
394.00
358.00
392.00
390.00
333.00
199.00
401.00
258.00*
354.00
617.00
6
500.00
578.00
447.00
423.00
465.00
417.00
138.00
646.00
473.00
539.00
580.00
460.00
508.00
520.00
375.00
485.00
210.00
426.00
333.00*
351.00
762.00
5
400.00
490.00
366.00
421.00
407.00
311.00
398.00
560.00
501.00
459.00
434.00
403.00
330.00
413.00
378.00
479.00
220.00
341.00
437.00
389.00
478.00
6
500.00
576.00
478.00
458.00
475.00
500.00
225.00
727.00
643.00
624.00
508.00
521.00
404.00
495.00
394.00
583.00
228.00
387.00
602.00
384.00
620.00
5
400.00
310.00
368.00
373.00
415.00
443.00
414.00
573.00
370.00
477.00
438.00
362.00
358.00
401.00
318.00
385.00
195.00
352.00
259.00*
383.00
563.00
6
500.00
369.00
458.00
417.00
4S7.00
714.00
250.00
645.00
471.00
6*8.00
521.00
518.00
454.00
490.00
452.00
605.00
195.00
385.00.
409.00*
413.00
670.00
5
400.00
454.00
385.00
380.00
423.00
443.00
398.00
757.00*
570.00*
460.00
491.00
388.00
316.00
37i.OO
312.00
368.00
197.00*
367.00
446.00
343.00
362,00
6
500.00
484.00
477.00
470,00
516.00
530.00
257.00
726.00
737.00*
613.00
510.00
549.00
425.00
516.00
402.00
599.00
239.00
399.00
532.00
417.00
400.00
5
400.00
235.00
356.00
337.00
380.00
455.00*
413.00
539.00
691.00
509.00
397.00
378.00
362.00
432.00
309.00
395.00
198.00
357.00
t>70.00
343.00
548.00
6
500.00
366.00
430.00
413.00
493.00
660.00*
257.00
621.00
582.00
565.00
485.00
472.00
437.00
496.00
402.00
606.00
215.00
375.00
759.00
438.00
675.00
-------
TABLE 22. RAW DATA FOR 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ANALYSIS BY WATER TYPE
DISTILLED WATER
LOW YOUDEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
TAP WATEK SURFACE WATER WASTE WATER 1
2
10.00
7.87
6.41
WASTE WATER 2
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
1
8.00
8.05
7.92
8.57
7.49
4.99
6.50
8.16
24.20*
3.38
7.03
6.10
6.34
10.40
7.26
7.48
15.80*
6.10
2.53*
8.72
7.97*
2
10.00
9.69
8.79
10.30
9.08
4.92
7.36
8.82
18.50*
4.02
26.80*
7.69
8.46
5.87
9.66
9.14
14.80
6.50
9.39*
11.80
9.71*
1
8.00
7.23
7.00
7.23
8.51
3.28*
6.63
6.59
10.00
8.20
4.62
6.42
7.20
10.10
6.88
6.88
13.40*
5.30
10.60
7.88
7.09 '
2
10.00
9.03
8.16
9.56
11.00
6.47*
7.97
7.43
10.70
11.00
24.10*
9.23
8.68
7.80
7.46
8.51
7.43
6.80
16.20*
14.70*
8.90
1
8.00
7.89
7.26
7.38
7.37
6.50
6.50
6.95
8.28
6.16
9.00*
6.99
4.56*
9.57
8.59
7.50
5.87
5.50
8.12
8.66
8.13
2
10.00
10.00
9.00
8.71
9.42
8.86
8.38
7.93
10.90
8.28
27.40*
7.83
6.27*
6.90
9.69
9.41
8.76
7.50
13.00
12.40
9.55
1
8.00
5.62
5.83
0.34
5.29
14.20
9.09
10.60
5.79
7.71
9.00
7.36
6.34
68.00*
6.29
5.11
3.85
C.RO
0.00*
13.00
12.30*
51
14
98
69
44
14.40
11.90
27.00*
8.86
11.20
68
30
56
77
9.00
0.00*
16.10
20.10*
1
8.00
7.43
3.31*
6.49
6.54
6.12
11.00
5.08
8.68
6.45
5.71
9.98
6.36
13.70
6.80
7.50
5.21
5.70
5.60
12.90
8.60
2
10.00
6.79
5.50*
9.14
9.44
9.83
12. 8C
5.89
16. «
8.51
23.00*
9.38
8.59
4.20
8.30
9.41
0.00*
6.60
16.80
12.00
10.10
1
8.00
15.20*
6.30
7.46
7.91
0.00*
6.17
7.29
4.51
6.88
9.35
5.64
35.00*
5.4J
7.80
6.15
6-82
6.60
0.00*
12.80*
5.83
WASTE WATER 3
2
10.00
14.70
6.79
6.12
10.10
9.7;
6.27
5.39
9.15
11.60
22.30
8.75
32.20
23.20
9.80
7.35
P.30
10.00
0.00*
22.40
Z5.00
-------
TABLE 22 (continued)
o
CD
DISTILLED WATER
MEDIUM YOUDEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
TAP WATEK SURFACE HATER WASTE WATEK 1
WASTE WATER 2
WASTE WATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
3
40.00
40.70
36.00
24.90
36.00
41.50
36.70
33.60
36.00
33.40
94.50*
30.80
42.60
38.40
•36.50
33.60
41.20
37.40
4.64*
45.00
44.40*
4
50.00
47.80
45.90
57.50
47.20
51.70
44.20
43.40
46.40
47.60
93.20*
52.80
42.60
53.60
56.00
41.40
50.90
52.40
9.28*
65.20
59.20*
3
40.00
50.90
32.10
35.90
38.30
30.30*
37.10
29.20
51.60
39.30
93.30*
41.20
31.60
41.80
40.10
34.40
42.80
39.00
13.50
59.70
36.10
4
50.00
52.80
42.60
52.30
51.60
36.30*
45.30
35.00
64.50
42. bO
108.00*
52.80
41.00
54.00
51.80
43.80
56.20
50.00
10.80*
73.20
48.70
3
40.00
45.00
35.60
38.70
43.80
41.70
37.10
29.90
43.80
34.70
88.10*
44.20
34.60*
43.90
39.80
31.90
44.90
42.00
0.00*
54.70
42.40
4
50.00
53^60
43.50
24.90
50.60
4^.50
47.40
45.90
48.70
40.80
97.70*
51.40
31.00*
44.40
53.30
39.80
64.90
49.60
0.00*
60.80
51.30
3
40.00
41.50
12.00
25.90
44.70
40.40
37.20
31.70
42.00
39.60
91.60*
39.40
34.90
25.80
28.20
30.10
51.20
53.00
0.00*
69.30
59.40*
4
50.00
39.50
52.10
32.70
51.80
51.10
49.30
35.30
61.40
46.90
83.10
62.30
54.50
55.50
28.40
40,90
67.80
57.40
0.00*
78.90
86.20*
3
40.00
37.90
13.70*
32.70
44.50
29.80
41.90
20.80
32.10
43.70
117.00*
38.40
30.00
44.60
36.20
31.91
'.4.60
33.30
0.00*
60. 9C
44.40
4
50.00
39.10
37.20*
41.00
53.60
41.20
53.70
30.00
49.50
49.90
121.00*
48.60
36.90
53.10
45.00
39.80
46.80
50.30
0.00*
55.80
50.30
3
40.00
55.80
34.80
45.60
63.90
21.00
26.00
40.00
29.10
39.90
90.50
48.50
39.90
43.10
35.80
31.00
59.30
81.60
C 00«
54.20
71.80
4
50.00
85.80
29.20
39.10
76.60
44.70
48.30
55.10
61.60
63.80
195.00*
64.20
40.90
48.30
50.10
37.90
65.30
95.60
0.00*
129.00
103.00
-------
TABLE 22 (continued)
o
vD
DISTILLED WATER
HIGH YOUUEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
TAP WATER SURFACE WATER WASTE WATER 1
WASTE WATER 2
WASTE WATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CUNC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
IB
19
20
5
399.00
367.00
324.00
343.00
372.00
319.00
386.00
508.00
301.00
458.00
490.00
446.00
30
-------
TABLE 23. RAW DATA FOR TRICHLOROETHENE ANALYSIS BY WATER TYPE
DISTILLEO UATEH
TAP KATER
LOU TOUDEN PAIK, UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE UATEK HASTE WATER 1
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
IS
17
18
19
20
1
8.0U
7.58
7.77
6.74
7.46
*
8.83
9.30
26.90*
7.12
5.52
4.32
22.90*
8.99
8.24
7.46
13.30
6.80
l.«?
7.47
10.20*
2
10.00
7.80
9.52
8.75
9.40
*
8.09
11.10
19,60*
6,61
5.13
6.56
34.10*
9.67
10.40
9.32
12.00
10.20
1.36*
11.20
10.80*
1
8.UO
7.24
7.21
5.99
a. 74
4
7.26
8.27
10.70
7.49
5.49
4.93
25.80*
9.20
8.22
6.66
19.00*
5.90
4.72
7.47
4.51
2
10.00
7.39
9.08
8.65
11.50
•
8.65
10.10
12.40
10.60
5.84
6.27
26.20*
SI. 40
9.89
8.36
10.10
8.^0
6.61
15.90
5.09
WASTE WATER 2
WASTE WATER 3
1
8.00
8.38
7.38
5. 98
7.51
4
6.75
7.90
8.36
5.96
4.32*
5.30
2.50
9.31
8.83
7.51
6.67
6.78
3.04
8.3S
6.13
2
IO.UO
11.30
9.70
7.19
9.46
*
9.55
9.5S
10.90
7.55
1.79*
6.13
5.20
9.78
11.20
9.39
8.64
8.48
4.70
12.90
9.52
1
8.00
9.02
5.44
11.00
9.62
*
15.70
9.58
0.87
9.42
9.90
6.25
24.30*
4.91
9.07
6,73
4.13
8.47
4.51
10.30
11.70*
2
10.00
12.20
6.74
0.22
11.80
*
16.60
5.78
8.03
12.40
6.10
6.48
34.90*
12.20
9.77
9.23
6. IB
12.80
5.01
15.10
30.80*
1
8.00
10.50
5.60
4.47
8.38
*
8.83
5.11
8.05
6.09
4.10
5.60
25.40*
7.30
7.67
7.51
6.12*
6.00
n.io
12.90
9.50*
2
10.00
10.90
7.39
6.66
10.90
*
10.00
6.84
11.50
7.97
30.60*
6.?5
36.60*
11.00
9.52
9.90
0.39*
7.70
15.00
10.80
13.50*
1
8.00
13.40
6.41
0.00*
9.13
*
8.93
7.45
5.34
9.93
4.38
5.80
29.30*
9.36
7.31
8.17
9.01
8.50
3,68
14.60
11.00*
2
10.00
14.80
8,41
0.00*
10.80
•
13.80
6.65
28.40*
12.10
5.06
6.83
38.70*
15.20
9.86
9.78
12.60
11.00
8.18
7.00
16.90*
-------
TABLE 23 (continued)
HIGH YOUUEN
DISTILLED WATEK TA»
AMPUL NO:
TKUE CONC:
LAB NUMBEK
1
2
3
4
5
A
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
5
399.00
236.00
362.00
301.00
383.00
*
342.00
437.00
321.00
537.00
200.00
344.00
108.00
331.00
391.00
373.00
147.00
198.00
440.00
390.00
652.00*
6
501.00
285.00
461.00
372.00
475.00
*
112.00
487.00
381.00
622.00
200.00
461.00
1200.00*
492.00
420.00
510.00
155.00
228.00
490.00
427.00
857.00*
5
399.00
234.00
366.00
363.00
388.00
*
308.00
498.00
321.00
487.00
165.00
371.00
777.00*
395.00
405.00
333.00
150.00
201.00
363.00
460. CO
653.00
WATEK
6
501 .00
308.00
471.00
375.00
482.00
•
111.00
511.00
369.00
622.00
225.00
454.00
1360.00*
489.00
420.00
426.00
159.00
162.00
428.00
455.00
892.00
PAIK. UNITS - UG/L
SUHFACE WATEK
5
399.00
256.00
375.00
323.00
419.00
*
305.00
415.00
394.00
457.00
198.00*
330.00
1270.00*
401.00
415.00
354.00
156.00
119.00
383.00
465.00
969.00*
6
501.00
284.00
484.00
359.00
483.00
*
125.00
474.00
461,00
613.00
173.00*
481.00
1220.00
469.00
422.00
509.00
156.00
295.00
490.00
464.00
1200.00
WASTE
5
399.00
*
382.00
304.00
434.00
*
276.00
417.00
322.00
518.00
179. OC
357.00
1270.00*
390.00
3*3.00
362.00
144.00
276.00
343.00
469.00
911,110*
WATEk 1
6
501.00
t
461.00
353.00
511.00
*
134,00
484.00
409.00
693.00
212.00
499.00
417.00*
478.00
439 CO
529.00
0.00*
306.00
460.00
520.00
S05(l.mi*
WASTE
5
399.00
576.00
382.00
297.00
430.00
*
306.00
392.00
460.00
463.00
256.00
362.00
830.00*
331.00
350.00
347.00
0.00*
278.00
594.00
413.0.
SS6.00*
WATEK 2
6
501.00
504.00
456.00
379.00
517.00
ft
139.00
402.00
580. CO
609.00
193.00
510.00
1180.00*
506.00
421.00
513.00
157.00*
292.00
726.00
504.00
668.00*
WASTE
5
399.00
264.00
368.00
297.00*
423.00
•
300.00
401.00
549.00
524.00
203.00
359.00
1140. CO*
434.00
328.00
3/9.00
15UOJ
293. OC
420.00
407.00
6< 5.03*
WATER 3
C
501.00
*
452.00
350.00*
523.00
*
143.00
440,1)0
454.00
596.00
200.00
480.00
1400.00*
514.00
409.00
503.00
161.00
293.00
514,00
553.00
80^.00*
-------
TABLE 23 (continued)
DISTILLED WATER
HEOIUH YOUUEH PAIK, UHITS - UG/^
TAP WATEH SUKFACE WATER WASTE WATER 1
WASTE WATER 2
WASTE WATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TKOE CONC:
LAB NUfffiEK
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
3
00.00
72.60
78.50
67.40
76.60
*
71.00
73.50
74.90
66.20
91.40
74.30
B4.40
ao.oo
82.40
78.10
72.00
66.00
40.20*
86.80
132.00*
4
100.00
74.70
96.70
103.00
J6.40
*
83.40
97.40
99.10
106.00
98.40
94.40
196.00*
96.10
110.00
97.80
85.50
72.00
48i20*
125.00
159.00*
3
80.00
/2.70
72.90
71.30
76.10
*
74.50
74.90
98.70
81.70
102.00
77.80
12J.OO*
60.80
83.80
78.90
0.00*
55.10
37.60
115.00
101.00
4
iou."o
75.40
92.40
95.70
103.00
•
89.50
90.00
99.90
110.00
105.00
101.00
160.00*
99.00
108.00
98.50
93.50
77.10
12.60
142.00
148.00
3
80.00
59.00
79.10
62.90
87.40
*
72.90
76.60
92.70
73.40
76.50*
81.60
251.00*
86.60
89.10
77.50
77.40
67.80
31.90
112. 01)
161.00*
4
100.00
74.70
97.20
«2.00
106.00
*
90.80
112.00
103.00
110.00
86.10* '
107.00
186.00
95.00
89.20
98.50
95.50
107.00
42.90
109.00
196.00
3
80.00
60.40
55.40
58.10
89.30
*
73.70
62.90
80.20
93.80
75.20
82.70
259.00*
73.30-
78.80
84.50
85.90
45.80
37.40
130.00
209,00*
4
100.00
•
94.50
67.80
102.00
t
93.40
99.00
114.00
112.00
82.60
111.00
327.00*
108.00
92.10
101.00
99.80
71.20
46.50
151.00
281.00*
3
80.00
83.40
76.40
56.10
87.50
*
68.20
69.60
68.10
83.00
106.00
80.90
76.50*
86.00
79.90
75.20
0.00*
72.90
55.50
113.00
148.00*
4
100.00
65.50
94.50
74.09
106.00
*
84.70
66.70
140.00
101.00
110.00
96.10
111.00*
99.70
102.00
95.20
0.00*
72.00
58.90
107.00
185.00*
3
80.00
*
73.80
41.40*
85.90
*
55.70
64.80
56.50
80.10
87,30
8*. 40
132.00*
37. 40
80.10
84.10
93.80
48.20
48.30
120.00
152.00*
4
100.00
*
94.90
66.90*
107.00
•
86.20
129.00
127.00
125.00
94.00
103.00
20?. 00*
IQS.QQ
105.00
100.00
102. GO
76. 'JO
52.70
155.00
250.00*
-------
TABLE 24. RAW DATA FOR DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ANALYSIS BY WATER TYPE
DISTILLED WATER
TAP WATtK
LOW YOUDCN PA1H. UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATEK WASTE HATER 1
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUH3EK
1
2
3
4 '
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
1
8.00 .
14.30
11.30
11.20
13.40
6.20
12.30
27.10
49.20*
12.80
1.95*
4.96
0.00*
14.80
10.90
12.70
27.10
8.70
6.23
5.89
14.80*
2
10.00
12.10
9.29
9.68
11.70
5.11
8.10
26.50*
22.40*
5.98
0.76*
4.87
0.00*
9.37
8.90
10.70
14.60
6.60
4.65
6.13
13.90*
1
8.00
15.50
10.60
10.40
16.60
13.80
12.10
61.10*
40.60*
14.70
2.32*
7.20
0.00*
19.60
12.60
12.80
21.20
8.20
7.43
5.81
13.10*
2
10.00
11.90
8.71
8.36
15.40
13.60
9.00
11.20
12.10
23.30*
1.14*
4.20
0.00*
10.70
7.96
10.80
8.67
6.70
7.90
7.60
12.40*
1
a. oo
17.50*
10.90
0.64
10.70
10.80
12.00
25.30
13.50
12.00
4.95*
6.44
0.00*
16.10
11.80
12.40
7.21
7.70
4.07
5.31
13.20*
2
10.00
15. /O*
9.26
8.18
9.56
6.70
10.30
25.20*
11. EO
8.86
8.15*
5.14
0.00*
9.26
9.47
10.90
2.59
6.40
4.95
6.10
11.60*
1
8.00
11.20
8.04
19.80
13. (JO
13.70
13.20
27.40
8.87
14.50'
1.75'
6.94
0.00'
13.80
8.94
11.30
0.44
11.00
8.19
8.25
22.20'
WASTE WATEK ?
WASTE WATER 3
2
10.00
13.20
8.46
1.11
10.70
10.30
13.30
17.40
16.10
13.20*
1.18*
3.62
0.00*
4.56
6.58
9.4
-------
TABLE 24 (continued)
DISTILLED WATEH
MEDIUM YOUOEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
TAP HATER SURFACE WATEH WASTE HATER 1
WASTE UATErt 2
HASTE WATER 3
AMPUL HO:
TRUE COWC:
LAB NUKUER
1
2
3 '
4
5
6
7
3
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
IS
17
18
19
20
3
80.00
99.40
78.30
66.60
74.80
69.50
49.10
77.20
85.80
86.30
38,30*
93.60
0.00*
84.20
80.30
68.70
87.80
89.50
97.50
55.20
142.00*
4
102. DC
108.00
97.80
113.00
111.00
89.30
71.10
99.40
118.00
142.00
40.40*
109.00
0.00*
101.00
116.00
89.30
110.00
122.00
118.00
83.80
197.00*
3
80.00
99.40
70.40
64.90
78.70
78.00
48.20
75.50
126.00
12.90*
44.00*
91.30
0.00*
67.20
75.80
71.60
95,30
95,00
89.50
70.80
110.00*
4
102.00
108.00
95.20
99.00
122.00
91.10
68.00
90.50
165.00
148.00
47.90*
128,00
0,00*
109 00
109.00
i'4.50
135. Ou
138,00
1G5.00
80.00
152.00*
3
80.00
118.00*
74.70
60.30
86.50
63.30
49.60
74.90
101.00
95.80
43.40*
86.90
0.00*
89.60
83.80
69.20
83.00
82.00
75.50
68.80
109.00*
4
102.00
136.00*
99.90
42.90
114.00
87.70
73.30
99.10
119.00
139.00
32.80*
129.00
0,00*
95,40
94.50
91.90
130.00
133.00
93.60
58.50
146.00*
3
80.00
71.60
49.00
61.30
87.10
68.50
47.90
65.70
86.70
106.00*
44.60*
87.00
0.00*
76.10
76.10
69.80
99.60
93.70
89.40
75.20
126.00*
4
102.00
•
94.20
70.70
107.00
33.80
70.10
87.50
122.00
144.00*
31.40*
126.00
9.00*
104.00
99.90
88. SO
142.00
112.00
110.00
97.10
143.00*
3
80.00
93.00
66.10
5*.00
77.90
78.30
33.30
81.50
105.00
105.00
;3.90*
90.10
0,00*
91.80
74.30
72.70
102,00
95.00
108.00
66.10
113.00*
4
102.00
116.00
96.10
75.00
109.00
96.80
65.60
75.30
151.00
127.00
50.30*
104.00
0.00*
97.00
99.70
68.70
128.00
124.00
130.00
68.50
151.00*
3
SO. 00
*
71.30
31.40
86.10
98.90
34.30
73.90
68.30
91.50
42.90*
90.50
0.00*
81.90
78.40
77.10
131.00
111.00
89.90
$7.8C
115.00*
4
102.00
*
92.70
51.70
120,00
1U.03
73.30
124.00
149.00
152.00
36.00*
116.00
0.00*
99.20
10/.QO
90.20
144.00
Hl.OO
115. CO
91.50
203.00*
-------
TABLE 24 (continued)
DISTILLED UATEK
HIGH YQUDEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
TAP UATEK SURFACE MATER WASTE WATER 1
WASTE WATER 2
WASTE MATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TKUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
b
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
5
400.00
447.00
374.00
283.00
414.00
344.00
142.00
414.00
347.00
602.00
94.00*
386.00
0.00*
315.00
402.00
337.00
344.00
444.00
480.00
244.00
803.00*
6
488.00
784.00
444.00
356.00
516.00
431.00
98.30
495.00
441.00
693.00
94.00*
576.00
0.00*
512.00
416.00
-------
RAW DATA FOR 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER ANALYSIS BY WATER TYPE
DISTILLED HATER
TAP HATER
LOW YOUDEN PA1H, UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATER HASTE HATER 1
WASTE WATER 2
HASTE HATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE COHC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
1
8.00
8.88
7.10
3.15 .
7.11
9.53
7.38
11. SO
31.60*
9.71
0.09
5.88
0.00*
7.29
7.17
8.58
0.00*
3.70
150.00*
0.00*
10.10
2
10.00
9.28
8.57
4.34
8.20
21.20
7.14
23.90
23.00
7.08
4.64
8.92
0.00*
10.70
9.54
10.10
27.10
5.70
133.00*
0.00*
11.20
1
8.00
8.06
0.75
8.32
4.27
4.83
7.05
0.00*
1.84
13.00
0.00*
8.82
0.00*
8.31
7.58
6.98
0.00*
0.00*
7.00
0.00*
8.78
2
10.00
9.05
2.16
9.40
1.90
3.63
8.16
0.00*
7.22
13.90
4.92
10.90
0.00*
6.34
8.11
8.43
0.00*
0.00*
14.00
0.00*
12.30
1
8.00
7.91
7.37
1.13
6.70
8.89
6.89
17.60*
7.26
9.53
0.00*
8.74
0.00*
23.10*
8.15
6.73
7.90
4.00
3.00
0.00*
8.55
2
10.00
8.73
8.93
5.11
8.61
9.38
8.78
19.60*
9.90
10.10
1.25
9.69
0.00*
9.20
8,01
8.73
2.28
5.30
7.00
0.19
10.30
1
8.00
15.10
4.61
8.35
4.54
7.45
8.03
9.30
4.33
13.60
0.00*
7.80
0.00*
7.97
7.24
7.37
0.00*
6.80
0.00*
0.00*
6.67
2
10.00
14.90
5.57
9.50
6.2S
8.81
12.00
19. ?0
4.76
17.10
3.90
9.33
0.00*
8.27
7.47
8.91
3.57
11.00
0.00*
16.40
8.90
1
8 00
12.10
5.06
3.42
6.93
6.68
7.54
9.90
48,20*
5,31
0.00*
8.13
0.00*
4.13
8.59
6.99
20.00*
4.90
5.60
10.40
10.80
2
10.00
11.10
6.75
5.09
8.52
7.22
0.20
21.80*
37.40*
7.22
5.23
8.21
0,00*
8.13
9,14
9.47
o.co*
5.20
0.00*
5.50
11.60
1
8.00
44.50*
5.97
30.60*
5.09
6.46
8.52
8.61
2.68
5.68
0.00*
7.51
0.00*
101.00*
8.04
7.59
19.10*
7.40
4.64
10.00
11.70
2
10.00
38.60*
8.49
31.90*
7.22
S3, 10
2.40
8.99
9.78
6.53
0,17
9.25
O.OO1
9.45
10.40
3.76
16.80
9.40
4.37
0.82
11.30
-------
TABLE 25 (continued)
DIStlLLED WATER
MEDIUM YOUDEN PAIK, UNITS - UG/L
TAP HATER SURFACE WATER WASTE WATER 1
WASTE WATER 2
WASTE WATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
3
BO. 00
78.60
69.70
52.50
36.00
57.70
76.00
69.00
73.40
0.00*
195.30*
77.60
0.00*
12.70
77.20
72.20
109.00
80.60
0.00*
0.00*
100.00
4
100.00
93.00
84.10
82.90
0.00*
71.20
97.10
120.00
138.00
0.00*
0.00*
97.90
75.60*
0.00*
108.00
87.20
63.30
106.00
0.00*
63.30*
112.00
3
90.00
80.30
44.40
90.60
16.00
66.70
77.30
30.60
83.20
0.00*
428.00*
72.30
0.00*
4.74
71.50
69.30
39.90
55.00
0.00*
0.00*
87.90
4
100.00
85.70
20.70
70.50
0.00*
12.30
88.60
101.00
52.60
0.00*
5.90
103.00
0.00*
0.00*
94.40
85.60
86.10
83.00
0.00*
77.20
113.00
3
80.00
66.20
69.90
52.70
20.30
74.20
74,70
".20
92.40
0.00*
129.00
86.10
0.00*
7.09
71.30
65.80
41.30
90.00
0.00*
0.00*
102.00
4
100.00
74.40
87.90
35.30
0.00*
57.50
92.90
130.00
106.00
0.00*
2.70
109.00
0.00*
0.00*
92.70
81.60
135.00
118.00
0.00*
65.40
130.00
3
80.00
102.00
56.60
48.20
24.10
87.70
82.70
70.40
83.00
0.00*
36.40
84.80
0.00*
0.00*
85.20
74.60
92.60
123.00
0.00*
134.00
85.50
4
100.00
85.70
85.30
60.10
0,00*
45.90
92.90
103.00
1 3 1 • w
0.00*
2.30
106.00
0.00*
0.00*
10S.OO
88.20
141.00
187.00
0.00*
170. 00
129.00
3
80.00
58.40
65.20
49.20
20.50
91.80
66.70
79.60
114.00
0.00*
26.50
81.80
0.00*
50.10
79.60
67.60
236.00*
91.00
O.UO*
73.20
0.00*
4
100.00
0.00*
88.40
60.30
0.00*
34.80
82.90
68.40
61.60
0.00*
U.OO*
93.00
0.00*
0.00*
104.00
80.60
111.00
122.00
0.00*
65.40
130.00
3
80.00
111.00
73.40
40.80
20.60
75.10
45.30
69.90
79.40
0.00*
65.70
85.60
0.00*
1.38
92.70
69.50
194.00*
123.00
o.ou*
72.60
0.00*
4
100.00
51.90
87.30
68.30
0.00
4.89
91.40
105.00
83.20
0.00'
0.00
92. 70
0.00'
0.00'
137.00
84.43
169.00
190.00
0.00'
81.00
31.40
-------
TABLE 25 (continued)
03
DISTILLED WATER
TAP HATER
HIGH YOUDEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATER HASTE WATER 1
HASTE HATER 2
HASTE HATER 3
AMPUL HO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
5
398,00
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
c.oo*
0.00*
6
501.00
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
o.co*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
o.uo*
0.00*
0 W=
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
5
398.00
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
16.00*
O.M*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
6
501.00
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
84.10*
o.co*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
5
398.00
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
6
501.00
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
1.27*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
5
398.00
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
o.on*
0.00*
0.00*
5.13*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
59.00*
0.00*
6
501.00
267.00
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00'
0.00*
0.00*
144.00
0.00*
0.00*
71.00
0.00*
5
398.00
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
6
501.00
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
o.co*
0,00*
0.00*
0.00*
2.79*
o.oc*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0,00*
0.00*
0.00*
5
393.00
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
4,64*
0.00*
0.00*
o.co*
O.OU"
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
6
501.00
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
O.OD*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
o.co*
0.00*
0,00'
0.00*
0,00*
0.00*
o.co*
0.09*
0.00*
0.0 u*
0.00*
-------
TABLE 26. RAW DATA FOR TETRACHLOROETHENE ANALYSIS BY WATER TYPE
DISTILLED WATER
TAP WATER
LOW YOUOEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATER HASTE WATER 1
WASTE WATER 2
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAG NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
1
8.00
8.04
7.12
8.35
6.85
1.20
7.07
17.30
29.00*
8.35
3.31
3.93
31.50*
10.70
8.07
6.59
15.80
7.04
4.73
7.20
8.23
2
10.00
9.92
9.32
11.50
8.49
2.00
7.99
18.10
28.30*
8.14
10.86
2.83
43.10*
9.59
10.70
8.03
13.30
7.30
4.09
11.00
9.19
1
8.00
7.98
6.77
9.31
7.83
10.90
7.29
17.10*
8.66
7.40
3.28
3.90
39.00*
10.20
7.53
4.90*
19.60*
5.40
7.00
9.21
6.99
2
10.00
9.60
8.22
11.40
10.60
9.33
8.74
18.30
20.10
10.70
14.40
1.77
45.20*
11.50
9.82
6.40*
8.90
6.80
9.80
14.00
7.77
1
8.00
8.32
6.91
7.97
7.34
3.29
7,18
17.00*
8.59
7.72
5.21
5.29
0.00*
10.00
9.13
6.42
3.64
7.90
3.50
6.86
6.21
2
10.00
11.20
9.03
9.07
9.48
11.40
9.08
17.70
10,10
8.72
12.30
2.91
0.00*
10.20
11.30
6.17
9.04
8.00
4.70
11.20
8.78
1
8.00
0.00*
9.64
0.00*
2.60
129.00*
4.60
18. bO
4.80
8.57
3.04
0.00*
15.00
0.00*
2.40
0.00*
0.00*
0.00'
0.00*
6.30
10.90*
2
10.00
3.48
6.00
0.00*
1.50
0.00*
15.40
9.70
27.50*
11.90
9.21
o.oov
45.00*
2.17
4.60
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
9.50
22.10*
1
8.00
10.10
6.35
6.54
7.71
11.40
8.09
15.10
5.29
6.13
3.42
5.94
27.50*
6.07
7.26
3.70*
6.94
6.80
4.67
13.50
8.65
WASTE WATER 3
2
10.00
10.80
8.33
9.54
10.50
10.20
7.18
15.30
7.30
8.61
8.75
6.07
36.20*
10.30
8.83
4.71*
3.89
8.00
7.23
9.20
12.00
1
8.00
11.80
6.05
9.16
9.49
0.00*
8.51
16.30
12.50
8.79
3.27
5.83
39.80*
10.00
9.16
3.24*
6.83
7.80
3.98
16.40
9.20
2
10.00
10.20
7.41
8.15
11.20
27.60*
8.27
16.00
5.19
11.60
12.00
6.63
53.40*
12.50
11.80
4.13*
10.10
12.50
4.82
19.00
10.10
-------
TABLE 26 (continued)
o
DISTILLED MATER
MEDIUM YOUDEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
TAP MATER SURFACE MATER HASTE MATER 1
MASTE WATER 2
MASTE WATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
3
80.00
80.80
73.50
83.50
72.30
68.30
74.20
89.60
73.10
73.30
69.50
78.40
80.90
79.50
81.30
73.20
78.10
100.00*
80.00
78.60
86.50
4
100.00
103.00
88.50
124.00
91.10
102.00
85.00
108.00
95.90
114.00
78.60
101.00
0.00*
107.00
110.00
85.80
89.60
110.00
95.00
117.00
103.00
3
80.00
82.50
70.60
117.00
75.30
159.00*
75.30
71.70
78.10
81.90
85.40
81.40
50.30
83.30
81.00
68.50*
81.20
82.70
90.70
112.00
82.50
4
100.00
108.00
87.40
109.00
97.30
125.00
91.70
93.50
99.40
112.00
97.80
103.00
64.60
109.00
107.00
84.50*
93.20
104.00
103.00
142.00
118.00
3
80.00
95.20
71.60
75.20
83.50
72.90
75.70
76.50
83.80
79.80
65.40
88.80
373.00*
86.70
88.70
65.00
78.30
91.00
59.10
81,10
85.80
4
100.00
110.00
92.10
49.90*
99.40
110.00
93.20
121.00
97.30
112.00
71.10
110.00
94.00
96.90
106.00
80.00
95.40
111.00
75.80
101.00
107.00
3
80.00
12.30
72.40
38.90
77.00
177.00*
78.20
100.00
82.30
90.90
81.60
76.60
0.00*
53.40
72.30
64.50
60.50
58.40
0.00*
122.00
117.00*
4
100.00
21.00
95.40
73.00
90.00
50.70
77.20
97.30
102.00
110.00
99.00
95.60
248.00*
80.40
87.30
78.50
66.50
49.40
0.00*
132.00
144.00*
3
80.00
88.40
84.80
72.80
83.20
95.20
76.90
61.20
62.90
89.20
73.50
86.40
23.70*
84.30
82.20
53.30*
64.60
102.00
103.00
80.40
86.90
4
100.00
108.00
89.50
85.90
103.00
146.00
88.20
81.20
94,20
103.00
53.90
106.00
33.70
113.00
98.70
69.70*
74.60
125.00
122.00
101.00
135.00
3
80.00
93.80
66.50
64.30
87.20
134.00
54.10
72.00
41.00
85.10
66.90
86.00
69.60*
91.00
81,80
60.10*
90.40
118.00
80.50
119.00
95.00
4
100.00
100.00
77.70
94.70
105.00
220.00*
92.10
91.80
94.30
121.00
'4.70
104.00
133.00*
106.00
106.00
73.60*
'02.00
147.00
95.10
149.00
119.00
-------
TABLE 26 (continued)
DISTILLED WATER
TAP WATER
HIGH YOUOEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/l
SURFACE WATER WASTE WATER 1
WASTE WATER 2
WASTE WATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
5
399.00
384.00
331.00
367.00
381.00
401.00
401.00
375.00
297.00
491.00
168.00
319.00
607.00
310.00
387.00
366.00
165.00
391.00
376.00
400.00
416.00
6
500.00
690.00
448.00
462.00
475.00
557.00
104.00
435.00
376.00
604.00
171.00
456.00
603.00
490.00
421.00
473.00
171. :>0
428.00
460.00
442.00
479.00
5
399.00
325.00
346.00
434.00
379.00
312.00
397.00
349.00
326.00
449.00
135.00
355.00
340.00
408.00
413.00
312.00*
154.00
419.00
398.00
509.00
467 ,00
6
500.00
719.00
456.00
480.00
477.00
327.00
104.00
454.00
366.00
597.00
246.00
425.00
702.00
466.00
429.00
390.00*
167.00
395.00
489.00
286.00
629.00
5
399.00
461.00
345.00
599.00
413.00
289.00
393.00
375.00
389.00
434.00
148.00
373.00
488.00
394.00
412.00
322.00
157.00
356.00
311,00
511.00
525.00
6
500.00
712.00
460.00
444.00
497.00
497.00
122.00
424.00
464.00
571.00
133.00
477.00
665.00
485.00
428.00
448.00
168.00
401.00
448.00
532.00
643.00
5
399.00
661.00
363.00
338.00
406.00
327.00
382.00
372.00
318.00
473.00
145.00
313.00
1050.00*
358.00
350.00
345.00
104.00
291.00
135.00*
518.00
4/7.00*
6
500.00
99.00
453.00
417.00
490.00
627.00
110.00
385.00
423.00
662.00
192.00
467.00
1300.00*
464.00
453.00
182.00
105.00
338.00
226.01)*
721.00
602.00*
5
399.00
661.00
364.00
191.00
423.00
332.00
387.00
350.00
447.00
438.00
178.00
353.00
347.00
344.00
364.00
313.00*
141.00
426.00
475.00
439.00
389.00
6
500.00
436.00
467.00
480.00
519.00
357.00
138.00
395.00
6C7.00
586.00
183.00
514.00
586.00
529.00
433.00
448.00*
171.00
465.00
628.00
642.00
488.00
5
399.00
340.00
341.00
382.00
429.00
440.00
396.00
370.00
554.00
475.00
168.00
341.00
989.00*
424.00
337.00
329.00*
154.00
449.00
354.00
0.00*
454.00
6
500.00
367.00
429.00
4S4.00
535.00
519.00
141.00
407.00
452.00
568.00
i; 3.00
474.00
1600.00*
523.00
450.00
449.00*
166.00
502.00
489.00
0.00*
582.00
-------
TABLE 27. RAW DATA FOR 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE ANALYSIS BY WATER TYPE
DISTILLED WATER
TAP HATER
LOW YOUOEN PAIK, UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE HATER HASTE HATER 1
HASTE WATER 2
HASTE HATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE COMC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
1
8.00
16.40
6.01
6.71
7.00
2.02
7.28
22.80
28.60
5.33
4.87
0.00*
0.00*
7.54
6.87
6.25
12.10
0.00*
2.51
*
0.00*
2
10.00
10.70
8.78
8.64
8.85
2.11
9.55
23.30
28.10
9.61
0.67
0.00*
0.00*
10.70
10.20
7.86
15.40
0.00*
2.51
*
0.00*
1
8.00
15.90
6.11
6.85
8.15
6.08
7.21
22.70
11.80
5.76
3.57
0.00*
0.00*
7.61
7.29
5.49
20.60
0.00*
4.24
*
0.00*
2
10.00
10.00
7.77
8.16
10.80
10.10
10.00
23.20*
12.20
7.64
5.32
0.00*
0.00*
11.40
9.00
6.48
8.38
0.00*
7.06
*
0.00*
1
8.00
7.21
6.18
6.02
8.61
3.21
6.72
22.60*
10.20
6.00
5.65
0.00-
0.00*
7.17
8.26
5.72
7.27
0.00*
4.35
*
0.00*
2
10.00
10.30
8.35
7.54
11.30
2.12*
10.00
23.20*
11.70
7.43
10.50
0.00*
0.00*
11.30
9.91
7.27
8.08
0.00*
6.08
*
0.00*
1
8.00
5.80
7.23
0.12
9.52
4.04
10.40
3.10
8.44
7.58
1.00
0.00*
0.00*
10.20*
5.32
4.55
2.83
0.00*
17.00
*
0.00*
2
10.00
*
8.56
0.54
13.90
3.73
14.40
3.30
14.40
9.48
6.20
0.00*
0.00*
15.80*
12.60
6.84
8.91
0.00*
19.80
*
0.00*
1
8.00
9.78
5.33
4.75
9.73
9.21
7.84
22.10*
8.93
4.08
4.82
0.00*
0.00*
10.80
6.88
5.00
10.50
0.00*
2.05
*
0.00*
2
10.00
•*
7.51
6.60
12.10
3.20
3.80
22.60*
11.90
7.18
7.85
0.00*
0.00*
11.40
8.94
6.69
5.67
0.00*
4.11
*
0.00*
1
8.00
12.70
6.87
5.49
8.81
9.70
8.73
21.90«
4.94
5.01
5.04
0.00*
0.00*
17.80*
8.73
5.12
6.96
0.00*
4.13
»
0.00*
2
10.00
13.80
8.90
5.23
12.50
0.00*
9.09
22,70*
7.63
6.83
0.90
0.00*
0.00*
11.30*
9.19
5.85
5.60
0.00*
3.86
*
0.00*
-------
TABLE 27 (continued)
DISTILLED WATER
MEDIUM YOUUEN PA IK, UNITS - UG/L
TAP MATER SURFACE WATEK WASTE WATER 1
WASTE WATEK 2
WASTE WATEK 3
AMPUL NO:
TKUE CUNC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1Z
13
14
15
16
17
'8
19
20
3
BO. 00
80.70
69.60
64.20
77.80
55.50
82.90
57.00
73.70
68.10
79.00
278.00*
0.00*
87.30
87.90
65.20
81.10
64.00*
82.60
*
0.00*
4
100. OU
104.00
85.30
122.00
95.30
88.80
84.50
64.30
88.60
99.80
90.40
353.00*
0.00*
105.00
113.00
81.90
105.00
59.10*
191.00*
*
0.00*
3
80.00
81.50
69.30
73.50
77.70
52.30
74.40
47.90
89.90
78.10
92.10
254.00*
O.OO1
85.90
84.10
64.30
74.00
68.90
40.40
*
0.00*
4
100.00
101.00
88.00
91.80
101.00
81.80
89.40
58.00
115.00
107.00
96,20
286.00*
0.00*
118.00
106.00
81.20
130.00
104.00
113.00
*
0.00«
3
80.00
86.00
71.90
61.20
79.10
77.50
74.40
46.00
90.50
79.00
64.30
278.00*
0.00*
93.10
88.30
62.00
80.70
63.00
144.00*
*
0.00*
4
100.00
101.00
87.20
41.10
97. 80
85.90
96.90
65.90
98.80
104.00
73.30
322.00*
0.00*
96.70
108.00
79.00
111.00
82.70
134.00
*
o.co*
3
80.00
75.60
73.90
53.10
75.40
74.20
74.90
31.40*
71.90
84.10
78.60
239.00*
0.00*
83.30*
60.30
61.20
89.60
83. UO
66.20
it
0.00*
4
100.00
112.00
89.30
62.30
96.80
71.20
110.00
59.40
90.70
109.00
75.80
293.00*
0.00*
143.00*
68.30
74.60
124. CO
91.00
90.40
*
0.00*
3
80.00
78.80
79.40
59.50
73.70
53.30
76.70
53.70
72.40
80.20
75.90
284.00*
0.00*
89.50
79.70
56.10
69.80
62.00
88.70
*
0.00*
4
100.00
106.00
89.30
69.40
96.70
69.10
103.00
64.70
107.00
97.70
79.50
241.00*
0.00*
96.10
101.00
74.60
80.10
82.00
60.80
*
0.00*
3
80.00
87.20
72.80
51.30
80.10
60.40
61.50
43.80
47.00
75.40
71.50
333.00*
0.00*
91.40*
84.50
61.20
103.00
82.00
69.50
*
0.00*
4
100.00
114.00
88.30
75.10
99.00
102.00
101.00
58.50
110.00
110.00
72.90
253.00'
0.00'
137.00'
105.00
72.80
116.00
101.00
82.60
1
0.00'
-------
TABLE 27 (continued)
DISTILLED MATER
TAP WAHK
HIGH YOUDEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATER WASTE WATER 1
HASTE WATER 2
WASTE WATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB KUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
S
399.00
3B2.00
343.00
296.00
38*. 00
524.00
225.00
368.00
319.00
460.00
340.00
328.00
0.00*
355.00
419.00
336.00
423.00
277.00*
487.00
*
0.00*
6
501.00
548.00
457.00
370.00
471.00
582. Ol
153.00
561.00
448.00
605.00
320.00
419.00
O.CO*
520.00
401.00
437.00
509.00
314.00*
556.00
*
0.00*
5
399.00
360.00
351.00
374.00
375.00
255.00
245.00
327.00
355.00
443.00
429.00
289.10
O.vO*
483. 0>>
397. CO
290.00
371.00
393.00
517.00
*
0.00*
6
501.00
537.00
459.00
362.00
467.00
418. CO
162.00*
498.00
413.00
600.00
359.00
383.00
0.00*
473.00
435.00
339.00
480.00
452.00
549.00
*
0.00*
5
399.00
410.00
347.00
328.00
396.00
250.00
246.00
282.00
421.00
437.00
328.00
y. i.oo
0.00*
419.00
433.00
273.00
414.00
342.00
880.00*
*
0.00*
6
501.00
544.00
463.00
412.00
461.00
278.00
147.00
375.00
424.00
564.00
346.00
403.00
0.00*
535.00
419.00
390.00
452.00
457.00
1480.00*
*
0.00*
5
399.00
371.00
367.00
177.00
394.00
32C.OO
248.00
337.00
352.00
486.00
318.00
297.00
0.00*
390.00*
307.00
262.00
370.00
405.00
332.00
*
0.00*
6
501.00
405.00
458.00
399.00
498.00
382.00
152.00
514.00
437.00
621.00
346.00
478.00
0.00*
516.00*
391.00
3/8.00
379.00
466.00
623.00
*
0.00*
5
399.00
371.00
371.00
318.00
406.00
305.00
245.00
350.00
419.00
459.00
362.00
309.00
0.00*
390.00
399.00
284.00
317. CO
363.00
504.00
*
0,00*
6
501.00
452.00
471.00
434.00
488.00
381.00
186.00
575.00
638.00
580.00
375,00
505.00
0.00*
622.00
400.00
389,00
488.00
424.00
661.00
4
0.00*
5
399.00
381.00
356.00
328.00
395.00
303.00
25?. 00
394.00
657.00*
465.00
319.00
360.00
0.00*
438.00*
347.00
2bO.OO
381.00
44i .00
243.00
•
0.00*
6
501.00
470.00
429.00
40.5.00
494.00
468.00
166. CO1
494.00
517.00
562.00
33S.OO
508.00
O.CO'
614.00'
453.00
371.00
481.00
538.00
452.00
0.00
-------
TABLE 28. RAW DATA FOR BROMOMETHANE ANALYSIS BY WATER TYPE
DISTILLED WATER
TAP WATER
LOW YOUDEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WAUK WASTE WATER 1
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
AB NUKBER
1
2
3
4
9
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
1
8.00
6.34
11.20
6.06
3.52
3.83
0.00*
3.99
0.50*
3.17
7.30
0.92
8.85
3.78
6.14
7.21
4.59
48.30*
2.88
0.08
5.06
2
10.00
9.95
13.00
5.73
4.71
4.80
20.50*
3.62
0.44*
4.99
12.10
2.30
9.72
3.89
6.21
9.06
5.37
100.00*
3.39
10.20
5.38
1
8.00
4.98
16.20*
5.26
4.18
3.39
0.00*
5.42
0.35
2.42
9.17
2.83
7.43
3.06
4.74
6.01
4.65
11.70*
2.30*
5.37
6.21
2
10.00
10.80
17.00
5.68
5.49
6.37
22.30*
8.50
1.10
3.92
13.30
0.00*
9.06
4.50
7.30
7.12
6.21
12.30*
2.74*
6.39
1.84
1
8.00
5.70
9.94
1.49
3.53
4.97
23.30*
7.07
2.61
0.56
9.17
2.36
5.48
3.13
5.69
7.21
12.60
76.00*
1./4*
16.40
5.16
2
10.00
9.26
14.40
1.94
5.43
6.01
33.50
11.90
4.09
1.82
10.90
2.04
7.73
4.57
7.64
8.86
0.07
91.00'
2.21
13.20
2.80
1
8.00
7.65
11.50
1.23
4.41
3.07
9.30
17.40*
0.52*
2.22
10.20
2.14
8.98
3.22
7.79
5.98
4.43
14.70
1.21*
4.70
2
10.00
5.66
13.20
13.20
2.34
7.18
4.30
23.30
20.60*
0.60*
3.51
15.20
1.51
12.30
4.96
7,29
9.25
4.35
16.00
1.82*
J.61
6.42
WASTE WATER 2
WASTE WATER 3
1
8.00
8.08
10.90
6.34
4.55
3.71
16.70*
14.50*
0.50
a. 23
£f.2o
0.00*
7.23
1.70*
5.97
6.09
5.04
23.00'
1.57*
b.91
3.75
2
10.00
5.48
12.80
4.99
4.91
16.60
17.70*
55.30*
5.04
3.63
15.40
2.50
10.60
3.23*
7.54
8.56
4.38
66.30*
3.07*
9.68
3.53
1
8.00
8.57
13.20
0.00*
4.82
8.18
14.80*
57.60*
0.00*
3.59
0.00*
2.97
9-37
3.40
6.69
7.27
4.43
95.00*
3.25*
2.20
4.73
2
10.00
10.50
17. HO
0.00*
7.67
J4.20
16.70*
61.20*
0.00*
3,92
4.90
6,06
11.20
3.99
8.58
10.90
3.30
26.00*
2. 77*
1.&7
4.99
-------
TABLE 28 (continued)
cr>
DISTILLED WATER
MEDIUM tOUDEH PAIR. UNITS - UG/L
TAP WATER SUKFACE WATER WASTE WATEK 1
WASTE WATEH 2
WASTE WATEH 3
AMPUL HO:
TRUE CCWC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
3
80.00
22.60
28.40
12.50
20.70
23.10
125.00*
65.70*
12.00*
26.30
103.00*
20.80
20.10
27.00
27.30
39.00
36.60
82.70*
23.10
21.50
25.50
4
100.00
30.80
41.20
102. 00
27.90
24.80
139.00
92.30
23.60*
30.00
124.00
11.50
68.60
34.60
38.80
49.70
28.30
110.00*
26.10
26.90
34.00
3
80.00
22.20
37.90
87.40
28.00
22.00
125.00
82.50
11.70
26.00
113.00
22,80
50.30
25.20
27.80
34.60
27.40
73.00*
20.00*
13.90
37.70
4
100.00
32.60
68.40
138.00
34.40
26.90
146.00
123.00
61.40
30.80
161.00
28.10
70.00
31.00
38.10
41.80
45.80
102.00*
27.70*
26.90
44.80
3
80.00
28.50
37.00
53.10
24.80
26.10
146.00*
83.90*
22.00
24.90
97.40*
18.40
48.20
25.70
25.30
32.90
29.10
23.20
15.50*
15.20
36.60
4
100.00
38.60
50.50
72.90
37. ?0
32.30
146.00*
121.00
29.60
39.80
104.00
24.90
62.00
27.70
33.80
43.70
35.20
96.70
21.60*
40.60
52.50
3
80.00
24.90
49.90
9.29
23.90
22.80
132.00*
108.00*
22.40*
26.70
97.10*
18.10
62.80
26.50
30.20
33.90
31.70
20.40
1«.70*
12.90
37.70
4
100.00
34.70
72.00
8.00
29.00
33.10
153.00*
161.00*
18.00*
27.80
122.00*
34.70
78.50
34.40
40.80
44.80
35.20
23.90
?Z.bC*
29.90
49.30
3
80.00
22.30
41.10
49.70
21.20
25.60
125. 00A
125.00*
13.90
26.80
110.00*
21.80
49.70
18.10*
29.10
37.80
24.50
78.70*
19.70*
20.10
30.00
4
100.00
20.10
52.00
82.50
29.70
26.60
139.00*
245.00*
51.00
28.60
135.00*
31.70
67.00
24.50*
38.90
50. 6U
29.70
112. OU*
26.00*
38.80
54.20
3
80.00
24.00
53.30
2.71
24.50
23.20
125.00*
166.00*
10.10
22.90
107.00*
28.10
58.60
27.50
32.70
32.50
32.00
100.00*
15.40*
21. BO
32. 20
4
100.00
22.50
71.60
19.10
32.30
30.30
180.00*
229.00*
34.30
38.00
137.00*
33.70
78.20
30. SC
38.60
48.90
30. SO
38. yo*
19. eo*
26.40
39. 2
-------
TABLE 28 (continued)
DISTILLED WATER
HIGH YOUOEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
TAP WATER SURFACE WATER WASTE WATER 1
WASTE WATEH 2
WASTE KATEH 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CUNC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
13
19
20
5
398.00
291.00
415.00
667.00
295.00
424.00
737.00
470.00
343.00*
395.00
425.00
326.00
752.00
388.00
356.00
421.00
389.00
2600.00*
261.00
511. 00
459.00
6
499.00
427.00
535.00
1200.00*
403.00
656.00
1684.00*
625.00
450.00*
516.00
523.00
553.00
1070.00*
496.00
4S«i.OO
647.00
431.00
2200.00*
351.00
338.00
685,00
5
398.00
539.00
513.00
1130.00
301.00
405.00
884.00
655.00
343.00
439.00
433.00
279.00
1100.00
349.00
339.00
394.00
406.00
2100.00*
271.00*
348.00
587.00
6
499.00
474.00
628.00
1480.00
405.00
515.00
1850.00
831.00
394.00
552.00
556.00
622.00
1550.00
523.00
440.00
685.00
483.00
2500.00*
351.00*
350.00
751.00
5
398.00
244.00
483.00
643.00
343.00
474.00
800.00*
1050.00
306.00
484.00
456.00
379.00
1140.00
355.00
357.00
411.00
333.00
495.00
326.00*
345.00
964.00
6
499.00
509.00
738.00
1270.00
424.00
586.00
2900.00*
897.00
444.00
619.00
451.00
538.00
1120.00
492.00
502.00
685.00
376.00
640.00
419.00*
433.00
1410.00
5
393.00
438.00
634. UO
1150.00*
336.00
390.00
0.00*
1100.00*
353.00*
446.00
415.00
350.00
872.00*
257.00
376.00
392.00
350.00
560.00
318.00*
343.00
608.00
6
499.00
49Z.OO
672.00
1320.00
465.00
459.00
2190.00*
1320.00*
346.00*
637.00
513.00
540.00
1400.00
500.00
446,00
682.00
387.00
580.00
428.00*
301.00
732.00
5
398 »00
457.00
H5.00
869.00*
321.00
342.00
800.00*
1300.00*
337.00
466.00
465.00
372.00
1264.00*
260.00*
3u9.00
453.00
296.00
1900.00*
321.011*
471.00
623.00
6
499.00
^.00
t.S.OO
1650.00
412.00
416.00
1980.00*
1370.00*
359.00
635.00
513.00
566.00
1527.00
372.00*
504.00
706.00
332.00
2400.00*
398.00*
389.00
777.00
5
398.00
453.00
624. Od*
908.00*
329.00
349.00
1100.00*
1750.00*
363.00
431.00
418.00
329.00
1170.00*
374.00
386,00
402.00
299.00
2900.00*
298.00*
352.00
438.00
6
499.00
468.00
67<-00
976.00*
436.00
478.00
2060.00*
1960.00*
489.00
433.00
518.00
582.00
1550.00*
539.00
525.00
631.00
370.00
Z4QO. CO*
40'J.OO*
487.00
611.00
-------
TABLE 29. RAW DATA FOR CHLOROETHANE ANALYSIS BY WATER TYPE
CD
DISTILLED WATER
TAP WATER
LOW YOUOEN PAIR. UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE MATER HASTE WATER 1
WASTE WATER ?
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CCNC:
LAE NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
1
6.00
7.44
5.77
9.71*
7.39
6.34
0.00*
5.99
3.33
6.70
11.60
4.41
5.86
5.54
9.45
7.34
7.66*
45.30*
4.77
4.46
6.48
2
10.00
10.70
9.«5
9.5;i*
10.40
9.24
3.15*
6.60
5.73
8.96
24.00*
8.78
7.19
7.65
10.30
10.80
15.30*
69.00*
7.27
9,50
8.80
1
8.00
5.54
5.68
9.98*
8.39
6.85
0.00*
6.90
3.73
4.97
9.53
4.92
5.96
5.00
8.11
6.69
13.20*
11.30*
4.43*
7.05
7.50
2
10.00
11.70
8.53
11.90*
11.30
10.50
0.00*
12.80
5.60
9.00
25.00*
7.72
8,30
8.34
12.00
9.28
16.90*
14.80*
6.30*
6.23
10.80
1
8.00
6.82
6.22
4.88
9.25
6.92
0.00*
11.60*
2.93
5.17
14.50
5.55
5.61
4.08
3.29
7.03
6.32
64.00*
3.81
16.60
9.89
2
10.00
10.10
8.85
7.54
12.90
10.00
0.00*
19.70*
6.40
6.09
22.20*
7.38
6.5/
8.31
12.50
11.30
14.70
59.00*
5.14
14.70
11.20
1
8.00
7.47
3.71
3.05
9.65
6. 88
0.00*
15.20*
4.00
5.48
22.50
5.40
6.49
4.55
9.25
6.69
12.20*
24.60
2.25*
5.26*
7.36
2
10.00
9.41
8.79
4.87
14.60
9.96
0.00*
19.30*
2.80
8.53
29.30
7.64
9.50
8.67
12.40
10.60
18.40*
27.10
3.57*
3.66*
9.66
1
8.00
6.35
5.6fl
4.20
8.09
7.16
0.00*
9.33*
4.00
6.21
4.83
3.38
6.30
2.53*
8.45
6.45
12,20
17.50*
3.94
5.71
8.12
2
10.00
7.88
8.12
4.35
10.60
12.80
2.10*
20.30*
6.67
8.37
20.00*
8.09
9.25
6.43*
11.30
10.10
10. UU
65.00*
6.75
3.25
7.31
i
8.00
7.38
S.96
6.14
11.20
7.98
0.00'
13.40
7.07
7.10
8.36
5.51
6.36
4.08
9.15
6.95
7.19
12.60
4.64
2.63
8.76
HASTt WATER 3
2
10.00
7.99
8.92
1.30
IS.40
12,«0
0,00*
42.40*
11.90
7.62
30.60*
8.33
9.79
7.75
11.50
1Z.?0
11. SO
23.00*
5.71
0.12*
3.59
-------
TABLE 29 (continued)
\D
DISTILLED HATER
MEDIUM YOUDEN ?AIR, UNITS - UG/L
TAP HATER SURFACE WATEK WASTE WATER 1
WASTE WATER Z
WASTE WATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
3
40.00
37.20
31.50
64.10*
32.10
31.50
25.30*
93.20*
24.40
31.50
68.40*
34.50
15.60
39.50
38.30
48.20
81,60*
43.00*
33.60
26.60
37.70
4
SO. 00
47.80
44.60
119.00*
45.80
42.60
0.00*
113.00*
26.30
40.90
93.50*
45.80
55.90
53.30
54.10
58.60
61.50*
67.00*
39.40
33.10
46.70
3
40.00
44.80
32.60
90.20*
42.20
34*30
33.60*
104.00*
23.70
31.70
90.90*
31.60
44.00
36.60
38.40
49.10
65.20*
56.00*
26.70*
18.70
49.90
4
50.00
44.80
43.70
135.00*
52.50
44.00
25.30*
154.00*
42.10
42.90
72.80
46.20
57.40
48.30
52.60
54.40
101.00*
65.00*
38.80*
33.10
63.90
3
40.00
35.10
37.20
56.30
42.80
37.00
25.30*
73.70*
25.20
31.00
65.80*
33.40
30.90
36.90
40.30
47.50
58.70
18.60
26.60
24.10
55.40
4
50.00
57.30
44.50
93.30
56.60
48.00
42.10*
86.90*
35.70
47.60
103.00
40.60
41.80
44.60
50.30
57.20
66.30
106.00
41.50
43.10
47. 2U
3
40.00
32.20
38.70
21.00
35.80
39.30
25.00*
78.20*
26.00
32.00
66.50*
32.60
41.60
37.30
45.30
47.40
77,80*
30.70
25.30*
15.20*
41.50
4
50.00
48.30
48.10
20.00
45.20
51.60
25.60*
109.00*
35.20
39.50
90.50*
45.00
53.70
54.80
60.30
56.30
•:e.oo*
38.30
35.00*
33.70*
i>7.90
3
40.00
30.70
29.70
49.90
33.60
37.00
8.40*
67.70*
21.70
32.00
7*. 50
33.40
33.20
25.80*
42.40
48.50
63.50
56.50*
29.30
25.70
38.00
4
50.00
38.20
34.70
77.20
47.80
42.40
16.90*
147.00*
32.50
40.60
96.30
18.20
48.70
32.90*
60.40
60.90
85.60
75.00*
38.10
40.70
60.50
3
40.00
27.90
36.00
11.50
36.90
42,20
25.30*
116.00*
37.90
32.20
70.30
35.80
39.10
36.:>0
43.20
45.90
60.80
18. SO
27.80
25.70*
40.30
4
50.00
41.50
43.70
21.90
50.70
43.70
0.00
1W.OO'
51.10
44. tO
90.50
45.80
52.80
40.50
56.00
60.40
80.50
10.50
3?.?0
'8. ?n<
53.40
-------
TABLE 29 (continued)
CO
O
DISTILLED WATEK
TAP WATER
HIGH YOUDEN PAIR. UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATEK WASTE WATER 1
WASTE WATEK 2
WASTE WATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CUNC:
LAS NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
5
399. 00
391.00
386.00
666.00*
372.00
523.00
75.00*
498.00
426.00
381.00
514.00
386.00
342.00
466.00
497.00
535.00
551.00*
930.00*
334-00
489.00
435.00
6
498.00
480.00
521.00
1100.00*
456.00
665.00
248.00*
508.00
574.00
450.00
54 4. 'JO
484.00
421.00
512,00
678.00
591.00
674.00*
830.00*
443.00
337.00
516.00
5
399.00
537.00
377.00
1060.00*
370.00
435.00
0.00*
595.00
490.00
401.00
542.00
386.00
460.00
441.no
507.00
522.00
562.00*
850.00*
321.00*
337.00
598.00
6
498.00
579.00
487.00
1270.00*
491.00
504.00
500.00*
551.00
536.00
447.00
550.00
522.00
587.00
518.00
604.00
624.00
632.00*
950.00*
420.00*
386.00
740.00
5
399.00
380.00
405.00
623.00
418.00
491.00
250.00*
872.00*
485.00
433.00
287.00
382.00
477.00
455.00
486.00
562.00
614.00
360.00
461.00
346.00
539.00
6
498.00
555.00
532.00
1000.00*
491.00
575.00
300.00*
709.00*
623.00
513.00
565.00
485.00
485.00
501.00
644.00
641.00
661.00
490.00
552.00
440.00
690.00
5
399.00
446.00
453.00
93U.UO*
422.00
491.00
0.00*
919.00*
487.00
422.00
504.00
409.00
369.00
379.00
493.00
532.00
556.00*
450.00
394.00*
342.00*
516.00
6
498.00
510.00
531.00
1010.00*
540.00
516. OU
400.00*
1110.00*
457.00
562.00
522.00
450.00
530.00
531. UO
547.00
658.00
596.00*
420.00
446.00*
237.00*
576.00
5
399.00
474.00
407.00
793.00*
408.00
402.00
175. 00«
1110.00*
481.00
429.00
520.00
424.00
525.00
273.00*
513.00
571.00
487.00
980.00*
389.00
430.00
539.00
6
498.00
533.00
511.00
1130.00*
489.00
492.00
400.00*
1160.00*
457.00
523.00
534.00
472.00
559.00
445.00*
640.00
649.00
527.00
1000.00*
427.00
414.00
599.00
5
399.00
452.00
400.00
741. UO
411.00
414.00
175.00*
1340.00*
553.00
352.00
506.00
387.00
480.00
396.00
512.00
b63.00
252.00
840.00
40S.UO
357.00*
436.00
6
498.00
513.00
464.00
753.00
518. UO
499.00
400.00*
1400.00*
663.00
457.00
510.00
499.00
57Z.OO
515.00
657.00
649.00
546.00
740.00
510.00
465.00'
557,00
-------
TABLE 30. RAW DATA FOR 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ANALYSIS BY WATER TYPE
DISTILLED WATER
TAP WATER
LOW YOUUCN PA IK, UN I TV - UG/L
SURFACE WATER WASTE WATER 1
WASTE WATER 2
WASTE WATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TKUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
1
B.OO
8.41
6.93
9.40
6.63
6.89
5.82
4.57
5.08
8.38
2.76
5.34
7.90
5.35
7.75
7.92
8. 03
7.60
4.07
4.05
8.42*
2
10.00
10.50
9.21
12.20
9.27
10.10
10.20
8.22
8.88
10.30
12.10
9.03
9.41
8.60
9.92
12.10
9.04
7.00
6.19
b.37
12.40
1
8.00
6.93
6.65
9.44
7.63
7.90
7.45
7.46*
6.47
6.03
2.73
5.37
8.17
5.11
6.76
7.40
6.71
4.80
3.74*
5.00
6.45
2
10.00
11.10
9.12
12.40
9.87
13.00
9.67
11.50"
8.47
8.79
10.10
7.84
10.20
9.89
9.76
10.50
9.44
5.90
8.80*
6.16
10.60
1
8.00
6.37
6.81
8.51
9.77
14.10
8.18
16.10*
5.08
6.35
1.91
6.45
8.20
5.16
8.01
7.61
8.94
5.10
0.49
14.10
8.69*
2
10.00
9.60
8.70
12.10
12.70
15.30
10.30
26.70*
8.^3
9.80
15. VO
9.16
8.10
9.42
10.50
11.40
9.04
7.00
0.49*
12.'. J
11,6'J*
1
8.00
8.23
6.89
7.98
10.60
0.00*
7.27
17.70*
6.47
6.24
3.42
7.93
10.40
5.96
6. '94
9.62
6.12
7.00
1.70
5.09
30.60*
2
10.00
10.20
8.55
10.60
15.30
0.00*
8.85
23.90-
7.45
3.68
7.29
11,2!)
14.40
10.50
y.-i8
12.40
9.31
9.10
2.?7
6.72
42.10*
1
8.00
8.23
6.11
8.11
4.70
12.10*
8.45
8.28*
5.70
6.90
2.50
1.29
9.02
5.22
7.0?
6.91
6.61
7 . HO
4.70
3.«5
12.30*
2
10.00
7.77
10.00
10.30
7.5!
19.20*
11.30
13.50*
12.20
10.50
J3.80
5.43
12.90
11.70
9.24
10.70
7.U4
9.60
1.7-t
1.78
17.70'
1
8.00
6.45
7.06
2.54
8.14
22.20*
9.81
17.10*
10.10
6.71
6.92
6.43
10.10
4.11
7.17
S-87
5.80*
25. DO*
o.uo*
5.?4
58. CO*
2
10.00
8.49
10.40
4.31
10.80
2«.7U*
11.30
21.50*
12.50
7.44
10.30
8. SI
13.40
6.89
9.43
1 1 . JO
6.b'3*
38.50*
O.iX''
7.20
4 3. UO*
-------
TABLE 30 (continued)
N)
DISTILLED UATEH
HEUIUM YOUDEN PAIR. UNITS - UG/L
TAP HATER SURFACE WATER WASTE WATER 1
WASTE HATER 2
WASTE HATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUHBER
1
2
3
4-
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
n
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
3
40.00
36.40
38.20
50.50
34. 3U '
33. 6U
30.20
68.80*
36.40
34.20
80.70*
37.30
39.50
41.00
41.00
41.20
53.00
29.80
35.10
30.60
68.10*
4
50.00
65.60
47.90
84.90
47.80
51.40
26.90
84.00
40.90
46.60
88.00
48.60
83.10
58.60
53.70
52.70
44.10
38.30
91.80
36. bO
90.40*
3
40.00
39.20
40.50
67.20
44.00-
37.40
33.70
81.60*
35.40
36.50
76.10
34.20
63.30
39.70
39.10
39.80
42.00
28.00
32.40*
26.20
60.40
4
50.00
73.00
46.80
92.80
57.00
49.10
32.60
117.00*
48.20
48.80
101.00
45.40
77.70
52.20
53.20
48.00
54.30
31.40
36.10*
37.20
80.40
3
40.00
41.40
37.40
55.20
47.90
47. 50
34.90
70.20*
37.90
34.90
114.00*-
35.70
43.70
42.10
40.80
37.40
39.10
29.40
35.70
32.40
73.10*
4
50.00
56.60
47.30
64.20
63.10
57.40
38.30
73.70*
51.60
43.60
93.80*
43.50
59.20
52.30
49.10
50.10
48.00
67.00
72.30
44.00
204.00*
3
40.00
48.30
39.50
34.20
42.10
146.00*
39.80
79.80*
41.90
34.90
84.30*
35.10
63.20
41.30
47.7C
41.60
40.00
37.60
11.20
31. 50
196.00*
4
50.00
67.30
48.20
40. BO
47.90
240.00*
28.10
102.00*
49.50
47.70
90.20
45.70
77.70
55.50
62. JO
51.80
45.30
49.20
?16.00*
38.10
257.00*
3
40.00
49.60
49.30
51.00
36.60
77.80*
28.50
87.40*
32.50
37.10
79.40
34.00
55.20
40.20
42.70
38.90
54.40
47.30
76.00
28.40
88.80*
4
50.00
65.60
61.60
127.00*
50.80
123.00*
30.70
93.20*
46.40
43.30
83.00
44.60
68.70
49.60
54.20
51.30
64.50
62.00
55.90
37.50
113.00*
3
40.00
49.70
47.00
31.70
41.20
98.10*
44.20
91.60*
54.10
40.00
104.00*
36.50
58.20
40.10
44.70
39.50
33.90*
105.00*
159.00*
33.70
248.00*
4
50.00
63.90
57.60
43.60
54.00
133.00*
32.20
113.00'
6/.70
28.20
79.00
47.60
78.40
44.60
S9,20
53.20
41.60*
106.0')*
174.00'
35.30
304.00*
-------
TABLE 30 (continued)
OJ
DISTILLED WATER
TAP WATER
HIGH YOUDEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATER WASTE WATER 1
WASTE WATER 2
WASTE WATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
5
400.00
324.00
435.00
128.00
432.00
566.00
229.00
627.00
414.00
434.00
370.00
398.00
298.00
466.00
516.00
614.00
248.00
410.00
464.00
660.00
845.00*
6
499.00
456.00
337.00
133.00
375.00
578. OU
246.00
509.00
348.00
357.00
326.00
333.00
249.00
394.00
500.00
451.00
211.00
350.00
541.00
295.00
714.00*
5
400.00
536.00
447.00
178.00
456.00
649.00
ii06.00
827.00*
436.00
503.00
346.00
429.00
386.00
475.00
516.00
575.00
255.00
460.00
209.00*
475.00
831.00
6
499.00
465.00
324.00
141.00
414.00
485.00
286.00
821.00*
328.00
361.00
438.00
370.00
341.00
397.00
444.00
469.00
240.00
330.00
205.00*
344.00
724.00*
5
400.00
511.00
431.00
123.00
495.00
639.00
341.00
7 4;. 00*
447.00
552.00
412.00
404. UO
392.00
484.00
544.00
578.00
212.00
330.00
633.00
491.00
2370.00*
6
499.00
471.00
297.00
122-00
408.00
481.00
314.00
539.00*
380.00
466.00
325.00
369.00
357.00
383.00
471.00
473.00
207.00
320.00
470.00
365.00
1960.00*
5
400.00
389.00
419.00
150.00
521.00
1530.00*
63.30
713.00*
413.00
569.00
367.00
416.00
339.00
463.00
525.00
617.00
194.00
545.00
2060.00*
508.00
2U10.00*
6
499.00
392.00
300.00
120.00
446.00
1330.00*
330.00
704. GO*
291.00
490.00
392.00
316.00
255.00
4/9.00
413.00
492.00
205.00
225.00
1560.00*
314.00
1770.00*
5
400.00
428.00
482.00
144.00
474.00
737.00*
306.00
912.00*
423.00
511.00
389.00
437.00
40b.OO
436.00
506.00
697.00
191.00
570.00
767.00
499.00
1300.00*
6
499.00
396.00
275.00
141.00
399.00
692.00*
286.00
812.00*
296.00
478.00
411.00
349. OC
338.00
478.00
464.00
467.00
180.00
500.00
657.00
388.00
1000.00*
5
400.00
350.00
459.00
126.00*
472.00
2290.00*
529.00
948.00*
464.00
371.00
35/.00
397. UO
404.00
466.00
561.00
582.00
196.00*
1200.00*
2680. 'JO*
531.00
2910.00*
6
499.00
338.00
299.00
9/4.00*
12 '1,00
2150.00*
314.00
832.00*
405. UO
328.00
3ib.uO
333.00
329.00
416.00
466.00
441. UO
193.00*
110J.OO*
1320.00*
559.00
2600.00*
-------
TABLE 31. RAW DATA FOR CHLOROFORM ANALYSIS BY WATER TYPE
U)
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
DISTILLED WATER
1 2
8.00 10.00
TAP WATER
LOW YOUDEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATER WASTE WATER 1
7.56
8.20
7.51
7.63
8.75
7.19
4.60
4.67
8.32
4.95
7.76
6.86
4.88
7.83
4.64
7.41
7.30
6.65
7.07
6.85
9.48
10.20
8.67
9.33
10.90
10.10
6.05
8.76
11.20
11.80
11.60
8.26
7.03
8.92
8.11
8.77
7.00
8.42
5.62
9.12
1
8.00
6.80
5.02
27.80
6.10
4.45
18.70
0.00*
11.00
23.80
1.70
21.80
50.40*
6.75
5.90
5.70
9.40
5.90
0.00*
30.80
3.30
2
10.00
10.10
8.96
1.30
8.80
7.36
16.30
0.00*
16.30
37.30*
13.40
22.30
33.70*
5.90
7.60
7.30
12.20
7.20
0.00*
18.90
13.40
1
8.00
6.07
7.62
6.33
8.39
7.28
8.98
10.10
0.00*
6.01
6.07
9.41
7.14
4.88
7.59
4.92
9.70
5.50
5.03
21.50*
6.78
2
10.00
8.52
9.93
7.98
10.20
9.25
10.30
14.30
19.70
10.50
11.20
10.80
O.OO1
9.18
9.41
20.40
8.59
7.20
P. 35
12.40
8.94
1
8.00
9.46
10.70
5.02
9.59
7.H3
7.64
9.38
5.56
6.65
4.52
8.22
10.10
0.00*
.12
6.
13.50
6.80
4.60
2
10.00
10.20
6.61
5.47
12.70
10.20
7.
11.
0.00*
0.00*
8.10
.55
.10
6.83
8.33
11.80
10.90
10.90
5.60
8.22
15.30
9.04
5.90
0.00*
4.91
9.00
WASTE WATER 2
1
8.00
7.13
9.78
6.69
7.52
7.34
9.40
7.99
WASTE WATEK 3
4.30
7.14
5.11
6.47
7.84
.77
.87
.00
.44
.30
.82
6.32
6.66
O
i_
10.00
7.31
9.79
8.45
9.00
10.30
8.97
6.60
9.48
10.40
10.00
8.27
11.10
11,50
9.34
8.90
8.95
6.90
10.40
2.62*
8.62
1
8.00
2.40*
3.83
0.00*
8.20
7.69
55.30*
5.bU
8.60
6.79
7.10
10.40
8.00
0.00*
6.70
4.80
13.20
5.30*
0.00*
0.00*
25.20*
2
10.00
6.19*
1.51
0.00*
9.10
10.00
52.70*
17.7Q
15.20
8.86
18.90
9.40
4.40
0.00*
9.00
6.00
0.00*
58.30*
0.00*
1.10
21.60
-------
TABLE 31 (continued)
MEDIUM YOUUEN PAIR, UNITS - UU/L
LTI
AMPUL NO:
TKUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
UISTILLEO
3
40.00
37.20
42.80
36.60
35.20
38.10
37.60
44.70
34.30
38.30
46.60
39.90
54.80*
40.50
38.10
36.40
47.50
36.20
38.30
45.30
39.80
WATER
4
50.00
51.00
52.80
54.70
45.50
45.30
29. 1U
58. BO
33.20
49.10
46.80
50.40
68.60
58.50
47.10
41.00
39.40
46.10
46.00
49.50
50.70
TAP
3
40.00
39.40
43.40
58.20
39.90
37.30
67.10
0.00*
34.50
36.20
38.90
42.10
95.70*
23.10
32.20
39.00
40.40
39.70
25.10
49.40
40.00
WATER
4
50.00
57.20
50.00
78.20*
53.00
47.10
50.80
12.90*
50.80
40.30
44.60
60.10
97.80*
43.50
42.90
43.70
49.50
49.50
103.00*
42.30
45.40
SURFACE
3
40.00
37.40
42.50
35.60
44.60
37.90
36.60
35.20
39.60
40.40
39.70
38.40
38.40
41.50
34.70
40.10
39.30
32.80
30.90
41.00
43.00
WATER
4
50.00
48.80
49.10
42.60
56.10
47.10
37.00
40.00
77.60
50.40
59.30
44.00
42.80
49.70
42.40
43.00
48.80
71.00
43.10
53.10
74.20
WASTE
3
40.00
45.40
49.30
19.90
36.80
38.40
39.10
41.30
35.00
34. yo
49.60
42.40
46.00
34.00
37.80
36.50
44.40
28.70
0.00*
36.80
40.10
WATER 1
4
50.00
33.50
53.00
54.70
42.30
47.80
25.4(1
49.90
39.40
44.90
52.10
46.80
58.00
49.70
46.80
43.40
51.90
32.90
28.00
44.60
53.00
WASTE WATEK 2
3 4
40.00 50.00
41.40
47.30
36.90
37.bO
38. bO
30.60
46.bO
25.40
43.80
42.00
38.80
55.40
44.00
37.20
32.40
46.40
38.00
39.10
4J.40
38.20
37.
51.
34.70
56,10
100.00*
48.90
48.70
34.20
54.60
.50
.00
46.00
49.10
47.70
52.60
46.20
41.40
54.80
50.00
46.80
51.00
47.20
WASTE HATER 3
3 4
40.00 50.00
16.90*
51.00
0.00*
41.10
32.60
33.80
65.40
54.90
47,10
33.50
40.80
41.60
27.20
39.30
31.00
35.20
58.30*
23.70
38.40
50.80
20.40*
6U.90
10.30*
47.80
36.50
17.90
64. yo
48.60
44.20
50.00
50.00
54.30
28.60
48.10
41.40
41.50
116.00*
33.40
37.00
60.20
-------
TABLE 31 (continued)
U)
cr>
UISTILLEU WATER
TAP WATER
HIGH YOUOEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATER WASTE WATER \
WASTE WATER 2
WASTE WATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
5
400.00
283.00
382.00
361. OU
391.00
493.00
289.00
271.00
349. OU
337.00
304.00
375.00
327.00
440.00
347.00
429.00
179.00
390.00
341.00
477.00
401.00
6
bOl.OO
470.00
459.00
517.00
496.00
632.00
274.00
279.00
403.00
408.00
338.00
519.00
445.00
499.00
500.00
521.00
187.00
460.00
431.00
301.00
487.00
5
400.00
321.00
371.00
545.00*
383.00
373.00
367.00
272.00*
373.00
403.00
295.00
371.00
489.00*
425.00
378.00
428.00
168.00*
410.00
310.00
335.00
420.00
6
501.00
459.00
458.00
554.00
492.00
459.00
385.00
318.00*
373.00
408.00
339.00
507.00
637.00*
470.00
436.00
606.00
181.00*
460.00
389.00
350.00
491.00
5
400.00
389.00
384.00
341.00
412.00
352.00
310.00
289.00
360.00
436.00
227.00
365.00
476.00
431.00
370.00
414.00
16H.OO
280.00
385.00
329.00
628.00*
6
501.00
473.00
482.00
475.00
496.00
459.00
345. UO
309.00
618.00
519.00
381.00
475.00
503.00
402.00
499.00
557.00
189.00
370.00
496.00
358.00
790.00
5
400.00
280.00
387.00
424.00
418.00
375.00
308.00
311.00
343.00
415.00
290.00
390.00
400.00
407.00
342.00
416.00
1:5.00*
345.00
363.00
358.00
418.00
6
501.00
316.00
494.00
480.00
518.00
486.00
333.00
314.00
325.00
523.00
352.00
433.00
483.00
592.00
420.00
590.00
193.00
305.00
443.00
31H.OO
511.00
5
400.00
288.00
•335.00
392.00
405.00
348.00
298.00
349. 0'J
348.00
413.00
313.00
4 11 . 00
509.00
392.00
362.00
336.00
191.00
400.00
386.00
364.00
421.00
6
501.00
416.00
529.00
541.00
'.93.00
454.00
322.00
378.00
358.00
537.00
328.00
456.00
543.00
609.00
474.00
607.00
197.00
480.00
498.00
381.00
492.00
5
400.00
134.00*
417.00
324.00*
386.00
355.00
332.00
333.00
417.00
294.00
292.00
383.00
441.00
400.00
364.00
419.00
156.00*
530.00*
497.00
353.00
383.00
6
501.00
191.00*
509.00
374.00*
501.00
473.00
347.00
366.00
446.00
383.00
330.00
470.00
547.00
612.00
480.00
527.00
164.00*
530.00*
59S.OO
450.00
466.00
-------
TABLE 32. RAW DATA FOR CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ANALYSIS BY WATER TYPE
to
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
b
6
7
8-
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
DISTILLED WATER
1 2
8.00 10.00
9.34
8.54
8.07
6.91
.62
.90
.94
.43
.42
.00
,18
0.64*
6.50
6.48
7.96
6.31
7.60
6.72
2.92
7.69
10.20
11.00
9.39
8.61
10.20
9.28
5.76
8.66
10.30
12.40
10.10
0.88*
7.81
7.41
10.70
5.91
7.40
8.97
6.50
10.20
TAP WATER
1 2
8.00 10.00
8.19
7.74
5.73
7.53
8.00
8.40
4.78
5.95
1.14
0.00*
5.18
9.40
6.41
5.27
8.00
3.07
6.00
4.84
5.88
13.60*
LOW YOUUEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATER HASTE WATER 1
10.60
9.67
7.52
8.86
7.%
10.00
77
86
05
20
71
42
9.54
7.38
9.68
0.69
7.80
2.95
6.20
16.30*
1
8.00
6.79
7.92
7.50
9.43*
7.59
8.47
14.40*
5.56
6.28
2.98*
7.44
0.00*
5.52
6.72
9.00
8.38
5.80
0.12*
17.20*
7.77
2
10.00
9.57
9.92
8.97
11.20*
10.40
10.00
19.40*
9.19
8.33
17.20*
9.70
7.72
8.35
7.91
11.10
7.25
7.60
6.18
11.80
10.70
1
8.00
10.40
4.18
4.23
10.40
0.84
9.34
12.10*
6.72
5.32
5.25
6.75
3,06
4.60
4.78
5.07
5.87
0.00*
24.50*
4.77
13.40*
2
10.00
12.00
5.42
4.73
6.45
6.32
8.40
12.70*
8.27
7.55
15.60*
9.37
4.47
6.25
5.56
6.67
4.04
1.60
0.00*
7.31
16.00*
WASTE WATER 2
WASTE WATER 3
1
8.00
8.63
5.96
5.91
7.96
8.34
9.4;
9.53*
8.66
7.56
4.10
7.83
0.00*
5.60
6.42
5.25
8.30
5.00
1.28*
6.55
2
10.00
8.95
6.63
7.24
9.42
21.70*
8.43
12.40*
12.70
9.83
13.20
7.81
3.70
11.80
8.31
7.70
9.60
5.50
25.10*
3.37
1
b.OO
13.60
3.63
5.49
16.00
2.46
9.47
15.00*
7.91
6.30
0.00*
6.63
0.00*
4.83
5.20
3.51
7.50
2.60
5.90
3.38
2
10.00
14.50
5.34
4.40
18.70
7.85
8.66
18. HO'
11.90
7.66
21. UO
8.U1
0.00'
9.37
5.55
5.41
0.00'
7.60
1.7'J
5.51
7.01
9.60
23.40*
4.07
-------
TABLE 32 (continued)
OJ
00
DISTILLED WATER
MEDIUM YOUDEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
TAP WATER SURFACE WATEK WASTE WATEK 1
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAS NUMBER
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
3
40.00
34.20
39.70
38.70
36.50
34.30
37.70
42.40
34.50
37.80
59.10
35.00
8.60*
42.60
32.90
36.40
56.70
35.80
39.70
29.40
44.60
4
50.00
56.60
53.10
63.40
49.50
41.80
31.10
55.90
39.90
50.30
67.10
41.30
20.50*
68.90
39.20
46.20
38.70
47.00
36.80
38.20
55.10
3
40.00
35.40
39.50
53.30
40.90
49.70
38.10
46.60
34.00
40.90
75.90*
35.70
14.10
41.30
28.40
37.00
36.80
38.70
36.90
25.80
50.80*
4
50.00
61.80
49.70
74.10
54.80
64.10
33.30
81.40
45.90
53.00
54.80
47.0:1
18.70
60.70
38.50
44.70
50.40
51.50
45.70
38.20
60.90*
3
40.00
39.40
40.80
40.70
46.70*
34.20
36.90
60. 4G*
34.70
40. bO
70.40*
36.70
11.60*
41.50
27.80
36.70
42.30
33.00
35.40
31.10
46.10
4
50.00
51.90
47.70
48.80
62.40*
50.70
38.30
102.00*
50.40
52.20
69.70
43.40
14.60
59.80
36.40
47.80
51.30
82.00
40.50
43.50
55.90
3
40.00
43.10
20.80
26.90
42.00
48.20
39.30
61.10*
42.20
53,80
72.30*
36.70
18.40
41.10
32.40
33.00
31.90
32.90
20.90
27.80
53.20*
4
50.00
46.40
25.10
28.10
46.20
54.20
33.80
106.00'
48.30
61.10
70.30
47.80
26.30
57.00
43.70
42.20
51.50
38.90
224.00
35.80
74.40
WASTE WATER 2
WASTE WATEH 3
3
40.00
41.30
27.50
41.00
38.00
31.50
30.30
54.20*
32.70
42.30
59.90
36.80
15.70
39.80
34. UO
34. 3U
42. UO
36,20
31. 9U
30.70
45.20
4
50.00
4^.10
37.90
51.60
52.50
22. bO
J5.60
64.10*
46.60
43.50
71.50
49.30
13.70
58.20
38.21'
44.10
50.00
51.60
35.50
41.40
58.30
3
40.00
52.40
28.70
25.70
51.50
42.30
36.50
4H.90*
57.10
86.10
66.80
38.80
7.45
H3.30
25.40
25.10
33.10
52.60
23.70
28. 6C
50.20
4
50.00
54.90
37. 4U
38.10
62.30
44.00
44.90
87. 8U
70.50
70. 4U
47.20
47.00
12.30
53. 6U
36.10
39.40
41.40
52.40
29.70
31.90
65. UO
-------
TABLE 32 (continued)
DISTILLED WATEK
TAP WATER
HIGH rOUUEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATER WASTE WATER 1
WASTE WATER 2
WASTE WATER 3
AMPUL HO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
5
399.00
442.00
405.00
388.00
405.00
459.00
309.00
434.00
325.00
329.00
415.00
349.00
217.00*
428.00
312.00
488.00
256.00
400.00
335.00
516.00
464.00
6
501.00
604.00
499.00
568.00
502.00
721.00
340.00
473.00
381.00
407.00
445.00
425.00
328.00*
484.00
474.00
543.00
247.00
460.00
441.00
355.00
b79.00
5
399.00
452.00
388.00
518.00
419.00
423.00
327.00
518.00
335.00
421.00
367.00
337.00
348.00
447.00
313.00
470.00
272. UO
420.00
328.00
3H6.00
502.00*
6
501.00
546.00
511.00
586.00
553.00
565.00
412.00
605.00
360.00
447.00
552.00
481.00
555.00
474.00
398.00
573.00
288.00
450.00
4i!4.00
383.00
578.00*
5
399.00
428.00
406.00
369.00
444. UO*
393.00
327.00
468.00*
343.00
420.00
376.00
351.00
396.00
411.00
330. OU
463.00
216.00
270.00
402.00
394. UO
480.00
6
501.00
619.00
456. CO
520.00
541,00*
508.00
406.00
516.00*
425.00
503.00
339.00
469.00
441.00
454.00
478.00
567.00
240.00
4UU.OO
533.00
43U.OO
594.00
5
399.00
233.00
361.00
412.00
441.00
362.00
327.00
503.00*
328.00
429. UO
417.00
357. UO
395.00
383.00
317.00
426.00
187.00
385.00
558.1)0
444. UU
494. UO*
6
501.00
386.00
457.00
475.00
536.00
469.00
404.00
561.00*
328.00
541.00
432.00
424.0"
478.00
583.00
407.00
580.00
212.00
345.00
576.00
386.00
628.00*
5
399.00
357.00
408.00
423. OU
428.00
356.00
309.00
481.00*
343.00
359.00
427.00
385.00
550.00
444.00
328.00
473.00
209.00
430.00
334.00
400.00
492.00
6
501.00
529.00
475.00
588.00
527. UO
418.00
387.00
522.00*
340.00
453.00
441.00
154.00
475.00
587.00
44b.OO
563.00
216.00*
520.00
3'i'J.OO
«46.UO
568.00
5
399.00
386.00
396.00
390.00
418.00
365.00
409.00
543.00*
403.00
339.00
415.00
322.00
482.00
412.00
356.00
448.00
191.00*
455.00
516.00
441.00
463.00
6
501.00
514.00
469.00
437.00
535.00
468. UO
413.00
560.00
440.00
432.00
430.00
460.00
637.00
606.00
4^,6.00
538.00
205.00'
595.00
642.0U
581.00
578. OU
-------
TABLE 33. RAW DATA FOR TRANS-l,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ANALYSIS BY WATER TYPE
DISTILLED WATEK
TAP UATEK
LOW YOUUEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATER WASTE WATEH 1
AMPUL NO:
TKUE CONC:
LAB NUHUEK
1
2
3
4
b
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
1
8.00
6.41
b.32
10.40
3.37*
6.65
5,61
2.20
8.05
10.40
1.26
9.36
4.57
11.00*
3.76
4.38
4.85
0.00*
2.75
7.63
10.20*
2
10. UO
7.38
7.94
11.60
3.88*
8.58
9.02
3.24
12.00
7.33
2.62
17.90
5.39
13.90*
8.41
b.80
5.BS
0.00*
3.62
5.90
13.30*
I
8.UO
b.98
12.70
10.60*
4.15
8.20
6.10
8.27
4.83
7.04
1.49
7.42
4.81
11.90*
3.86
3.28
6.50
0.00*
1.80
7.57
10.80*
2
10.00
;.36
16.50
12.10*
4.87
10.20
9.27
4.36
6.71
8.25
2.74
11.50
1.59
18.50*
5.02
3.41
8.48
0.00*
2.10
9.81
13.80*
1
8.00
4.9'J
6.73
8.79
3.35
7.29
5.83
11.50
8.98
7.64
1.83
11.80
13.80
10.70*
7.28
4.72
6.02
0.00*
1.27
20.00*
10.80*
WASTE WAUK 2
WAS IE WATER 3
2
10.00
6.54
8.23
10.70
4.84
9.44
9.02
15.00
10.30
9.53
3.17
16.90
3.96
17.40*
4.90
5.78
7.b7
0.00*
5.98
15.00
13.40*
1
8.00
O.b4
0.00*
10. UO
0 = 00'
o.ou*
0.00*
0.80
0.00*
3.88
0.76
0.00*
0.00*
13.10*
16.50
242.00*
5.00
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
12.00*
2
10.00
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
4.98
0.00*
0.00*
15.90*
12. !0
242.00*
4.00
0.00*
0.00*
12.30
90.00*
1
8.00
10.40
2.?7
8.04
2.30*
7.78
7.68
2.53
15.60
7.57
1.19
10.70
3.40
9.34*
3.65
4.41
4.94
0.00*
3.00
6.30
10.20*
2
10.00
10.80
4.23
10.30
3.02*
9.H9
7.56
11.30
21.20*
6,88
5.60
12.30
7.92
18.70*
4.42
5.83
5.54
0.00*
9.45
3.52
12.70*
1
8.00
0.69
2.02
0.00'
0.00*
S.04
0.00*
7.10
13.30
7.99
4.10
12.50
22.00
0.00*
5.60
3.60
10.40
0.00*
1.30
0.00*
22.50*
2
10.00
2.35
1.4R
0.00*
0.00*
8.33
10.40
9.50
14.80
11.30
8.30
12.00
22.40
0.00*
R.OO
S.10
0,00*
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
16,00*
-------
TABLE 33 (continued)
DISTILLED WATER
MEDIUM YOUDEN PAIH. UNITS - UG/L
UP WATER SURFACE WATEK WASTE WATEH 1
WASTE WATER 2
WASTE WATEK 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAS NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
1U
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
3
80.00
52.00
42.60
85.20
28.70*
66.40
59.40
42.40
77.20
163.00*
102.00
79.80
37.80
103.00*
40.40
35.80
29.70
0.00*
35.00
90.20
1H.OO*
4
100. 00
69. HO
56.50
126.00
36.10*
85. 50
48.00
31.90
89.80
217.00*
110.00
109.00
54.30
17K.OO*
50.90
44.30
24.00
0.00*
42.00
104.00
149.00*
3
80.00
54.00
46.50
105.00*
33.40
71.90
59.40
26.30
73.80
197.00*
90.20
80.40
60.80
97.60*
37.40
34.00
24.80
0.00*
33.90
72.40
118.00*
4
100.00
73.20
60-00
144.00*
44.90
90.10
52.90
40.40
95.50
244.00*
127.00
104.00
41.40
160.00*
49.10
41.80
25.80
0.00*
43.50
104.00
145.00*
3
80.00
60.00
48.50
85.20
36.30
76.00
57.90
93.20
76.60
177.00*
88.70
77.90
44.40
99.60*
35.20
35.50
26.60
0.00*
57.10
83.40
114.00*
4
100.00
7/.60
56.70
107.00
48. bO
95.60
59.80
152.00
105.00
229.00*
121.00
98.10
21.40
163.00*
31.60
45.00
29.50
0.00»
70.60
112.00
201.UO*
3
80.00
0.06
41.10
64.00
34.10
49.80
0.00*
318.00*
0.00*
229.00*
109.00
91.70
13.90
245.00*
53.70
37.10
22.00
0.00*
0.00*
29.40
209.00*
4
iOO.OO
0.06
50.60
O.OU*
38.40
129.00
0.00*
306.00
0.00*
260.00
125.00
123.00
11.90
148.00*
69.00
44.50
21.00
0.00*
0.00*
108.00
314.00*
3
80.00
52.60
40.00
87.90
29.00*
79.50
45.40
108.00
85.00
181.00
137.00
84.80
51.80
104.00*
67.30
35.10
23.70
0.00*
69.00
92. 5U
123.00*
4
100.00
55.60
56.40
108.00
35.10*
104.00
49.20
131. UO
97.10
215.00
127.00
109.00
25.80
129.00*
8S.90
43.70
26.60
0.00*
81.10
116.00
146.00*
3
80.00
5.80
4;. 70
55.20
35.90
73.30
46.80
92.30
108.00
229;UO*
136.00
135.00
61.80
24.70
40.60
8.70
52.70
0.00*
66.70
82.60
129.00*
4
100.00
5.42
60.20
85.20
42.10
85.60
' 75.70
145.00
126.00
188.00
83.30
164.00
68.90
48.00
55.30
19.60
11.20
c.oo*
67.i')
80.60
166. UO*
-------
TABLE 33 (continued)
DISTILLED WATEK
TAP WATEK
HIGH YOUUEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATER WASTE WATER 1
WASTE WATER I
WASTE WATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
zn
5
400.00
263.00
187.00
420.00
110.00"
499.00
250,00
224.00
455.00
351.00
409.00
384.00
84.30
538.00*
198.00
170.00
255.00
0.00*
297.00
396.00
560.00*
6
488.00
318.00
238.00
578.00
131.00*
622.00
280.00
540.00
528.00
415.00
424.00
483.00
153.00
621.00*
259.00
199.00
272.00
0.00*
373-00
376.00
685.00*
5
400.00
296.00
173.00
526.00*
108.00
383.00
283.00
210.00
471.00
422.00
460.00
3/3.00
254.00
573.00*
219.00
162.00
261.00
0.00*
132.00
424.00
586.00*
6
488.00
311.00
296.00
613.00*
136.00
440.00
376.00
359.00
492.00
435.00
403.00
508.00
394.00
639.00*
248.00
194.00
278.00
0.00*
165.00
428.00
690.00*
5
400.00
266.00
209.00
359.00
119.00
399.00
283.00
405.UO
459.00
459.00
254.00
369. UO
190.00
545.00*
213. UO
163.00
271.00
0.00*
305.00
423.00
787.00*
6
488.00
339.00
224.00
541.00
132.00
479.00
392.00
170. UO
567.00
536.00
313.00
460.00
280.00
575.00*
270.00
201,00
303.00
O.OU*
384.00
446.00
930.00*
5
400.00
20.40
181.00
431.00
108.00
78.10
73.00
589.00
326.00
287.00
422,00
443.00
233.00
460.00*
449.00
164.00
176.00
0.00*
1020.00*
472.00
710.00*
6
488.00
45.20
25H.OO
418.00
125.00
245.00
91.00
269.00
279.00
444.00
419.00
494. t'J
269. JO
670.1)0*
261.00
20b.OO
214.00
0.00*
544.00
435.00
9H.OO*
5
400.00
310.00
288.00
472.00
103.00'
353.00
267.00
232.00
456.00
461.00
378.00
414.00
361.00
510.00*
198.00
155.00
271.00
0.00*
321.00
480.00
643.00*
6
488.00
342.00
257.00
594.00
124.00*
453.00
320.00
302.00
428.00
525.00
411.90
464.00
234.00
6C4.UO*
254.00
205.00
280.00
0.00'
385.00
469.00
/43.00*
5
400.00
35.90
235.00
406.00
110.00
370.00
354.00
230,00
460.00
284.00
405,00
410. UO
281.00
436.00
377.00
137.00
432.00
0.00*
492.00
472.00
607.00*
6
488.00
94.70
Z43.0U
445. UO
132.00
452.00
347.0!)
65.30
565.00
353.00
421.00
453. GO
315.00
594.00
266.00
166.00
464,00
0.00
583.00
556.00
736.00
-------
TABLE 34. RAW DATA FOR 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ANALYSIS BY WATER TYPE
OJ
DISTILLED MATEK
TAP WMTER
LOU YOUOEN PA1H. UNITS - U(i/L
SURFACE WATER WASTE WATER 1
WASTE WATER 2
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CUNC:
LAB NUMBER
1
^
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
Ib
17
18
19
20
1
8.00
7.U7
6.48
10. 1U
9.07
7.10
8.03
3.78*
5.60
11.70
0.93*
7.45
36.00*
4.91
6.90
7.69
6.93
5.30
5.89
0.19
8.51*
2
10.00
9.20
8.84
11.40
10.80
7.86
8.91
4.89*
8.88
14.20
1.60*
11.80
43.70*
5.86
8.66
10.20
6.82
4.80
7.69
4.19
10.40*
1
8.00
6.63
7.58
9.71
10.60
8.98
10. ?tl
8.30
7.89
12.40*
1.19*
13.50*
9.54
5.34
6.T1
7.57
7.75
4.00*
4.02
4.99
9.90*
2
10.00
8.95
10.20
11. 30
12.50
12.80
!0, ?0
10.20
10.30
14.20*
1.25*
17.50*
4.02
7.49
8.22
8.72
7.42
5.00*
4.78
5.87
12.90*
1
3.00
6.21
6.03
7.56
9.09
6.73
9.17
iU.90
5.23
8.36
0.82*
9.49
4.50
4.53
7.22
7.54
9.15
3.70
3.52
P. 80
0.44*
2
10.00
8.43
H.U7
10.00
11.20
8.63
8.69
13.50
8.66
10.40
1.23*
10.90
2.43
7.66
8.29
10.10
8.44
4.80
6.39
l.dl
11.40*
1
8.00
2.99
7.73
0.51
11.20
8.07
10.30
6.39
8.79
23.20*
1.67
6.08
29.20*
3.07
7.55
6.95
5.64
5.20
6.38
4.03
18.30*
2
10.00
3.99
8.14
2.92
15.40
10.00
10.50
6.79
10.00
24.20*
1.10
13.80
53.60*
4.96
10.40
8.97
7.28
6.50
9.39
7.04
15.20*
1
8.00
6.38
6.90
8.23
5.58
7.57
9.62
7.^5
6.75
9.92
3.16*
10.30
11. 80*
4.33
6.04
7.24
6.20*
4.70
4.40
4,74
7.90
2
10.00
7.12
7.57
12. ?0
8.33
10.40
6.52
10. HO
8.78
12.40
4.78*
15.00
52.80*
7.35
7.83
10.10
6.33*
5.bO
9.97
2.60
9.89
1
8.00
8.60
6.78
2.97
10.50
9.43
1.59
8.75
11.30
5.90
1.05
12.00
32.80'
0.00'
6.04
7.0!
12.80
5.20
4.22
4.23
10.00
WASTE WATER 3
2
10.00
12.10
7.27
7.35
14.30
10.90
8.91
13.HO
U.fO
8.44
3.25
14.80
30.70*
.94
.08
5.
8.
8.61
4.68
9.50
5.22
7.82
11.80
-------
TABLE 34 (continued)
MEDIUM YOUDEN PA1H, UNITS - UG/L
DISTILLED WATER
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
b
6
7
8
9
10
11
a
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
3
80.00
74.20
66.40
81. bO
74.60
62.20
62.90
38.20*
72.60
74.50
49.70*
82.60
136.00*
64.10
69.40
72.00
67.50
49.30
79.70
54.60
107.00*
4
100.00
83.00
82.30
120.00
98.90
87.70
51.40
bO.80*
79.70
99.90
50.40*
110.00
208.00*
101.00
87.90
88.80
b7.20
62.60
90.00
62.50
121.00*
TAP
3
80.00
71.40
76.70
94.10
85.40
65.10
63.60
52.80
70.90
83.90*
51.80*
85.40*
164.00*
60.80
58.70
71.00
58.30
50.00*
69.70
45.50
123.00*
WATER
4
100.00
87.00
91.40
126.00
112.00
db.OO
55.60
60.40
94.30
106.00*
60.90*
118.00*
97.10
88.20
80.70
86.10
67.90
64 00*
85.60
63.10
147.00*
SURFACE WATER
3
80.00
58.80
68.70
71.30
89.60
69.10
64.40
69.20
75.30
80.60
44.00*
77.50
211.00*
63.10
59.40
67.90
60.00
50.00
67.00
54.90
107.00*
4
100.00
81.00
80.50
99.40
116.00
82.30
63.30
101.00
104.00
104.00
54.40*
93.10
73.40
91.40
81.00
85.00
71.00
130.00
81.70
69.90
150.00*
WASTE
3
80.00
69.20
77.70
76.80
75.80
64.70
63.00
61.50
86.90
88.30*
ISO. 00*
78.80
327.00*
29.90
74.60
65.60
51.80
63. bO
57.60
47.00
110.00*
WATER 1
4
100.00
58.70
90.30
59.10
85.80
90.50
40.40
71.00
93.10
112.00*
52.80
95.70
348.00*
88.30
92.90
80.10
65.40
75.10
55.80
61.50
152.00*
WASTE
3
80.00
77.20
75.10
84.00
75.40
79.50
53.10
67.50
65.50
83.60
52.00*
86.00
180.00*
63.80
67.50
66.30
56.90*
68.00
69.20
58.10
101.00
WATER 2
4
100.00
80.70
99.60
98.00
99.50
104.00
49.70
83.50
92.10
97.30
55.40*
109.00
99.80*
80.70
82.90
82.70
61.00*
85.00
89.10
68,90
132.00
WASTE
3
80.00
81.10
75.40
60.70
82.60
74.90
65.10
7.70
122.00
89.50
159.00*
84.40
186.00'
74.60
68.00
61.90
50.50
70.70
69.90
55.70
112.00
WATER 3
4
100.00
80.20
106.00
88.80
106.00
91.10
49.40
93.60
123. UO
117.00
152.00
102.00
261.00'
80.40
91.00
79. 6U
65. HO
73. BO
79.60
57.70
136. Ui)
-------
TABLE 34 (continued)
DISTILLED WATER
TAP WATEK
HIGH YOUDEN PAIR, UNITS - Uli/L
SURFACE WATEK WASTE WATEK 1
WASH WATER 2
WASTE WATEH 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUHBEK
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
5
401.00
314.00
324.00
407.00
412.00
399.00
277.00
260.00*
380.00
418.00
245.00*
4U7.00
354.00*
376.00
372.00
371.00
150.00*
260.00
34?. 09
451.00
520.00*
6
499.00
376.00
396.00
543.00
517.00
468.00
312.00
301.00*
461.00
514.00
260.00*
473.00
617.00*
434.00
520.00
446.00
157.00
320. CO
430.00
296.00
626.00*
5
401.00
323.00
352.00
496.00*
405.00
338.00
3UO.OO
298.00
386.00
500.00*
284.00*
397.00*
833.00*
384.00
391.00
350.00
149.00*
260.00*
303.00
332.00
562.00*
6
499.00
378.00
394.00
621.00
514.00
386.00
383.00
334.00
424.00
524.00*
266.00*
456,00*
1360.00*
447.00
451.00
432.00
156.00
290.00*
392.00
340.00
687.00*
5
401.00
299.00
324.00
274.00
431.00
302.00
300.00
205.00
409,00
552.00
261.00*
3U4.00
820.00*
3'J3.00
396.00
344.00
147.00
270.00
338.00
329.00
616. OC»
6
499.00
405.00
451.00
491.00
507.00
355.00
396.00
224.00
492.00
638.00
185.00*
441.00
670.00
417.00
518.00
427.00
166.00
350. UO
422.00
359.00
722.00*
5
401.00
239.00
344.00
409.00
424.00
303.00
165. UU
241.00
391.00
525.00*
240. DO
413.00
1630.00*
322.00
367.00
331.00
131.00
345.00
460.00
351.00
557.00*
6
499.00
344.00
412.00
435.00
508.00
43U.OO
355. 00
261.00
328.00
645.00*
252.UD
404.00
1510.00*
497.00
436.00
431.00
145.00
305.00
514.00
325.00
69?. UU*
5
401.00
350.00
329.00
420.00
402. UO
282. UO
2'jb.OO
2-J2.UO
394.00
547.00
279. UO*
435.00
2490.00*
367.00
370.00
342.00
133.00*
360.00
366.00
377.00
554.00
6
499.00
456.00
582.00
540.00
472.00
401.00
338. OC
307.CO
378.00
659.00
26H.OO*
423.00
1290.00*
500.00
492.00
429.00
144.00*
430.00
433.00
371.00
647.0U
5
401.00
402.00
372.00
392.00
399.00
332.00
345.00
298.00
428.00
397.00
216.00
406. UO
1420.00*
378.00
388.00
331. UO
134.00
370.00
407.00
378. UO
563.00
6
499.00
457.00
521.00
423.00
507.00
452.00
354. UO
303.00
473.00
4H4.00
289.00
432.00
1/20. UO1
5U5.0i)
476,00
403.00
145.00'
44U.OO
503.00
43S-UO
febS.UU
-------
TABLE 35. RAW DATA FOR BROMOFORM ANALYSIS BY WATER TYPE
DISTILLED WATER
TAP HATER
LOW YOUDEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATEH WASTE HATER 1
CT>
AMPUL NO:
TH,!JE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Ib
16
17
18
19
20
1
8.00
8.10
7.17
12.10*
6.24
6.47
13.80
1.51
0.81
6.89
0.99
0.00*
0.00*
5.69
5.19
8.26
0.52
6.10
6.49
0.00*
- 6,08
2
10.00
11.70
9.00
13.80*
7.51
7.71
18.90
1.60
7.08
9.96
2.51
6.84
0.00*
7.17
6.61
11.30
0.09
b.C'J
9.20
3.07
10,40
1
8.00
7.43
8.22
11.10*
7.97
1.78
15.60*
0.00*
8.94
b.47
1.31*
0.00*
0.00*
6.96
4.37
8.40
2.2b
6.00
4.49
3.29
6.77
2
10.00
11.60
10.30
13.20*
9.89
1.51
20.00
0.00*
13.20
9.24
2.41*
12.00
0.00*
9.06
6.71
10.10
5.22
7.50
5.62
3.91
10.40
1
8.00
6.92
7.70
8.06
7.34
7.19
16.30*
10.50
6.23
6.89
0.38
6.03
O.UO*
5.27
4.99
8.64
1.59
4.00
4.20
10.90
5.79
2
10.00
9.27
9.70
10.80
9.07
9.50
20.00'
12.60
13.30
8.35
2.63
8.9H
0.00
8.48
6,17
11.90
3.24
4.70
12.80
7.73
9.63
1
8.00
10.40
4.88
6.12
10.70
10.80
29.40*
7.51
9.42
7.77
0.00*
9.10
0.00*
0.00*
4.25
9.04
3.31
3.50
10.90*
2.49
8. 2'0*
2
10.00
10.70
11.20
11.40
14.00
0.00*
7.30
10. bO
12.10
7.28
!.69
13.20
0.00*
2.91
6.bO
11.00
0.00*
1.50
18.20*
b.81
12. bO*
1
8.00
8.11
6.28
12.50
2.55
6.S2
16.88
2.91
9.76
5.85
0.00
9.59
0.00
6.96
3.96
12.00
0.80
3.20
3.H6
2.49
4.35
HASTE HATEK 2
2
10.00
9.33
7.91
3.40
5.Ob
11.60
6.32
1.83
13.20
5.68
3.92
18.00
0.00*
11.70
5.5B
13.60
0.1)0*
3.bO
10. bO
I.Ob
6.22
WASTE WATER 3
1
8.00
5.22
6.96
4.32
7.87
6.24
2.50
4.44
15.30
8.33
0.00*
lb.00
0.00*
10.10
4.03
8.5.7
6.84
7.60
1.02
o.uo*
5.70
2
10.00
7.46
6.35
H.59
10. bO
8.11
21.10
6.59
15.30
11.00
19,40
O.UO*
8.H6
5.21
10.10
0.00*
H.bO
2.4/
4.8'J
-------
TABLE 35 (continued)
DISTILLED HATER
MEDIUM YOUDEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
TAP WATER SURFACE HATER WASTE HATER 1
AMPUL NO:
TKUE CUNC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
14
20
3
80.00
76.80
75.40
86.50*
69.20
62.50
50. OU
61.80
77.20
89.30
46.211
75.00
0.00*
72.70
S8.80
'4.40
-16.00*
.7.40
•7.40
.90
'.30
4
101.00
113.00
95.40
134.00*
94. 6C
97. 3C
35.70
103.00
89.40
128.00
56.20
109. GO
0.00*
127.00
76.00
93.10
96.20
88.00
102.00
32.30
135.00
3
80.00
79.20
77.80
114.00*
80.70
65.10
50.00
108.00
78.90
109.00
53.90*
71.50
0.00*
74.60
48.10
77.50
115.00
78.00
80.00
59.30
97.50
4
101.00
118.00
105. UO
155.00*
114.00
82.70
40.50
134.00
112.00
141.00
65.90*
129.00
0.00*
110.00
64.70
96.80
187.00
104.00
97.50
82.30
117.00
3
80.00
78.00
78.40
74.10
85.20
78.20
43.80
69.30
91.10
99.50
54.40
72.30
0.00*
82.40
45.20
73.40
120.00
65.00
76.10
69.00
73.40
4
101.00
106.00
104.00
116.00
117.00
89.90
47.60
75.20
133.00
130.00
91.10
89.10
O.OU'
110.00
72.20
92.10
182.00
200.00
99.70
95.70
115.00
HATER 2
HASTE HA1ER
3
80.00
89.60
69.10
89.40
68.10
69.50
34.40
64.20
94.20
98.20
43.50
73.40
0.00*
38.40
61.30
72.70
75.20
87.30
90.20*
68.30
96.90*
4
101.00
102.00
88.80
83.60
87.00
62. 6U
28.60
83.20
119.00
123.00
56.70
85.30
0.00*
117.00
82.30
91.70
117.00
92.10
138.00*
89.20
139.00*
3
80.00
65.60
1,7.30
91.90
69.20
89.90
37.50
44.80
75.60
103.00
40.00
84.30
0.00*
88.30
53.50
75.90
79.70
65.70
84.90
71.40
85. 50
4
101.00
93.90
116.00
119.00
97.90
113.00
40.50
58.50
112.00
122.00
59.30
109.00
0.00*
112.00
70.90
97.40
113.00
100.00
99.60
95.20
115.00
3
80.00
84.60
82.10
87.10
64.80
92.30
40.60
34.90
136. UO
79.50
50.20
86.30
0.00'
93.50
52.70
70.50
40.00
71.80
77.80
66.70
87.80
4
101.00
9;. 10
15?. 00
87.50
116.00
120.00
38.10
104.00
173,00
128.00
58.30
100.00
O.OO1
106.00
74.80
92.^0
80.10
84.00
106.00
45.50
127.00
-------
TABLE 35 (continuded)
oc
DISTILLED WATER
TAP WATER
HIGH YOUUEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATER WASTE WATER 1
WASTE WATER 2
WASTE UATEK 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
'M
5
399. UO
416.00
373. UO
477.00*
380.00
483.00
159.00
491.00
356. OK
317.00
386.00
380.00
0.00*
420.00
338.00
373.00
1010.00*
360.00
328. UO
557.00
564.00
6
500.00
501.00
467.00
639.00*
500.00
540.00
200.00
615.00
481.00
425.00
412.00
548.00
0.00*
514.00
500.00
470.00
1360.00*
450.00
416.00
403.00
724.00
5
399.00
411.00
366.00
579.00*
371.00
363.00
181.00
643.00
367.00
393.00
194.00*
408.00
0.00*
443.00
379.00
379.00
1040. CO*
400.00
335.00
434.00
568.00
6
500.00
563.00
447.00
694.00*
500.00
420.00
320.00
615.00
429.00
423.00
370.00*
474.00
0.00*
551.00
457.00
472.00
1350.00*
470.00
409. UO
446. UO
696.00
5
399.00
405.00
374.00
372.00
404.00
407.00
182.00*
532.00
416.00
460.00
485.00
388.00
0.00*
452. UO
391.00
364.00
1171.00*
400.00
392. UO
426.00
529.00
6
500.00
571.00
423.00
594.00
500.00
478.00
326.00
485-.00
523.00
536.00
331.00
482.00
0.00*
514. UO
492.00
465.00
1445. UO*
560.00
5U6.0U
475. UO
676.00
5
399.00
339.00
371.00
468.00
362.00
304. OU
500.00
554.00
377.00
415.00
366.00
465.00
0.00*
359. OU
356.00
3faU.OO
876.00*
435.00
490.00*
497.00
555. UC*
6
500.00
516.00
436.00
557.00
455.00
435.00
240.00
795.00*
292.00
501.00
405.00
403.00
0.00*
501. UO
424.00
466. OU
1066.00*
415.00
581.00*
438.00
728.00*
5
399.00
335.00
411.00
515.00
368.00
319.00
182.00
312.00
397.00
430.00
403.00
466.00
0.00*
411. UO
346.00
378. UO
700.00*
410.00
384. UU
482.00
539.00
6
500.00
590.00
378.00
660.00
436.00
484.00
220.00
492.00
349. CO
562.00
403.00
433.00
O.UO*
520.00
482.00
469.00
841.110
530.00
50/.UO
467.00
647.00
5
399.00
398.00
408.00
487.00
369.00
401. UO
590.00
556.00
443.00
49U.OO
410.00
481.00
0.00*
450.00
399.00
356.00
845. 00*
4UO.OO
48U.UO
445.00
479.00
6
500.00
562. UU
4HH.OO
540.00
475.00
507. UO
280.00
879.00
Wfl.OO
353.00
423.00
454.00
O.UU
552.00
465.00
439.00
1202.00
b 30.00
607.00
bb6.UO
554. UU
-------
TABLE 36. RAW DATA FOR CHLOROBENZENE ANALYSIS BY WATER TYPE
DISTILLED HATEK
TAP WATER
LOW YUUDEN PA1K, UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATER WASTE WATER 1
WASTE WATER 2
WASTE WATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Ib
16
17
18
19
20
1
8.00
9.01
7.53
7.76
7.25
0.00*
8.89
4.21
5.27
8.56
4.06
0.00*
0.00*
5.19
10.60*
8.52
8.11
8.50
6.44
1.96
7.04
2
10.00
10.80
9.51
8.78
8.74
12.80
12.10
5.61
8.99
10.70
2.32
15.10
0.00*
7.08
12.60*
11.90
8.78
8.00
8.16
0.60
9.41
1
8.00
7.74
8.59
7.30
8.55
6.25
8.00
7.24'
5.80
6.76
3.34
0.58
0.00
5.54
9.47
8.32
8.50
7.40
3.65
3.65
5.37
2
10.00
11.30
8.95
8.68
9.59
7.83
13.20
12.10*
7.12
9.73
2.10
13.90
0.00*
9.55
11.60
9.73
10.40
0.00*
3.83
4.47
9.28
1
8.00
7.02
8.64
5.03
8.25
9.4i
8.67
10.40
6.59
7.25
4.00
2.20
U.OO*
5.06
10.40*
8.09
9.65
6.80
3.13
12.10
6.44
2
10.00
9.50
9.24
7.14
10.10
8.70
14.70
11.10
8.97
9.43
2.b6*
12.00
0.00*
8.28
12.00*
11.40
10.30
7 30
24.60*
9.02
9.02
1
8.00
16.80
375.00
20.00
240.00
0.00*
0.00*
20.00
55.00
0.00*
53.00
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
40.00
0.00*
0.00*
1890.00*
0.00*
0.00*
870.00*
2
10.00
0.00*
194.00
0.00*
290.00
137.00
61.00
0.00*
166.00
0.00*
144.00
140.00
0.00*
0.00*
70.00
0.00*
0.00*
1790.00*
0.00*
0.00*
160.00*
1
8.00
5.33
5.50
2.08*
6.53
0.00*
39.60*
3.70
6.38
3.45
4.78
10.30
0.00*
8.84
7.74*
6. DO
5.bO
9.20
5.57
9.95
4.0')
2
10.00
7.33
3.76
3.11
7.71
0.00'
13.20
4.75
8.47
7.11
4.22
0.00'
0.00:
11.30
9.14'
8.42
7.51
7.60
4.38
7.96
5.37
1
8.00
7.00
5.9R
0.00*
4.80
14. DO
0.00*
0.00*
5.70
9.49
16.30
3.90
0.00*
0.00*
7.20
5.bO
17.
-------
TABLE 36 (continued)
en
o
DISTILLED WATER
htUIUM YUUDEN PAIH, UNITS - UG/L
TAP WATER SURFACE WATER WASTE WATER 1
WflSTE WATER 2
WASTE WATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONG:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
3
80.00
82.80
81.90
74.20
70.40
136.00*
80.50
85.30
73.10
99.60
87.70
70.50
0.00*
76.60
97.80*
77. bO
104.00
81.50
77.60
57.60
82.30
4
100.00
110.00
99.00
108.00
103.00
132.00
53.00
120.00
85.60
130.00
106.00
109.00
0.00*
114.00
122.00*
94.70
79.80
109.00
61.60
75.10
115.00
3
80.00
86.40
77.90
93.10
91.00
64.20
69.50
115.00*
67.30
113.00
85.20
66.60
0.00*
76.90
87.40
73.90
78.70
80.40
76.40
50.30
90.30
4
100.00
115.00
97.40
125.00
113.00
78.60
57.60
173.00*
84.10
142.00
81.90
105.00
0.00*
101.00
106.00
91.80
112.00
102.00
95.50
75.10
109.00
3
80.00
76.90
78.80
64.80
92.10
131.00
56.10
64.20
72.30
108.00
99.60
70.60
119.00
84.50
91.90*
73.40
78.00
85.80
65.40
61.40
85.90
4
100.00
109.00
94.10
92.40
115.00
113.00
65. 90
7/.30
98.40
132.00
132.HO
95.50
0.00*
99.10
116.00*
90.90
99.40
260.00*
82.60
82.30
55.80
3
80.00
20.60
0.00*
34.00
O.UO*
236.00
0.00*
0.00*
256.00
294.00
407.00
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
110.00
3.00
0.00*
1790.00*
0.00*
0.00*
520.00*
4
100.00
0.00*
329.00
0.00*
0.00*
374.00
0.00*
O.OC*
237.00
262.00
213.00
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
70.00
0.00*
33.00
1690.00*
495.00
0.00*
270.00*
3
80.00
69.60
80.20
44.70*
78.70
5&..60*
56.10
57.70
61.70
103.00
78.00
82.20
O.UO*
70,40
94.60*
66.70
83.60
79.10
74.00
74.60
51.50
4
100.00
80.50
90.10
59.80*
97.10
0.00*
57.50
61.30
87.20
122.00
116.00
118.00
0.00*
93.30
1E1.00*
83.50
101.00
112.00
82.40
88. 4U
64.90
3
80.00
109.00
106.00
33.20
85.70
372.00*
61.70
57.50
106.00
105.00
105.00
71.40
0.00*
37.80
98.10
66.90
73.90
135.00
106.00
63.50
122.00*
4
100.00
95.00
52.00
59.50
109.00
241.00'
38.00
85.50
93.60
159.00
119.00
98. 4(J
0.00'
51.30
!?9.00
H5.60
86.90
140.00
118.00
48.20
146.00
-------
TABLE 36 (continued)
OtSTILLED WATER
HIGH YOUDEN PAIK, UNITS - UG/L
TAP WATEK SURFACE WATER WASTE WAI EH 1
WASTE WATER 2
WASTE WATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
5
400.00
430.00
431.00
405.00
370.00
594.00
277.00
532.00
353.00
327.00
293.00
398.00
0.00*
386.00
470.00*
386.00
390.00
41U.OO
441.00
529.00
462.00
6
500.00
538.00
495.00
537.00
477.00
1010.00*
300.00
567.00
419.00
402.00
330.00
572.00
0.00*
529.00
656.00*
488.00
418.00
550.00
551.00
347.00
569.00
5
400.00
430.00
392.00
469.00
373.00
426.00
315.00
766.00*
357.00
387.00
312.00
435.00
692.00*
428.00
489.00
372.00
397.00
420.00
319.00
364.00
453.00
6
500.00
562.00
502.00
566.00
483.00
565.00
386.00
975.00*
416.00
412.00
293.00
555.00
1100.00*
511.00
609.00
486.00
463.00
500.00
368.00
429.00
627.00
5
400.00
412.00
410.00
322.00
383.00
440.00
315. OU
517.00
360.00
425.00
396.00
385.00
494.00
406.00
495.00*
365.00
355.00
410.00
441.00
382.00
269.00
6
500.00
587.00
439.00
482.00
449.00
479.00
400.00
551.00
467.00
516.00
251.00
530.00
885.00*
481.00
681.00*
475.00
415.00
530.00
523.00
432.00
326.00
5
400.00
0.00*
764.00
398.00
107.00
457.00
0.00*
83.00
523.00
144.00
414.00
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
510.00
137.00
29.00
8790.00*
5460.00*
657.00
790,00*
6
500.00
197.00
469.00
346.00
219.00
706.00
0.00*
207.00
256.00
354.00
443.00
0.00*
0.00*
228.00
590.00
54.00
46.00
5790.00*
4480.00*
586.00
1100.00*
5
400.00
332.00
366.00
296.00*
360.00
268.00*
308.00
591.00
366.00
428.00
285.00
454.00
3810.00*
37';. 00
479.00*
361.00
375.00
440.00
133.00
414.00
333.00
6
500.00
414.00
577.00
366.00*
445.00
251.00*
287.00
610.00
366.00
532.00
367.09
531.00
1010.00*
596.00
624.00*
4H4.00
411.00
570.00
443.00
434.00
445.00
5
400.00
203.00
466.00
250.00
360.00
b49.00
483.00
826.00
391.00
324.00
286.00
444.00
1450.00*
348.00
522.00
365.00
351.00
660.00
600.00
367.00
77-0.00*
6
500.00
423.00
376.00
438.00
467.00
1020.00
375.00
956.00
490.00
412.00
328.00
529.00
1510.00'
583.00
657.00
450.00
394.00
940.00
871.00
507.00
755.00'
-------
TABLE 37. RAW DATA FOR 1,4-DICHL.OROBENZENE ANALYSIS BY WATER TYPE
Ui
DISTILlEi) WATER
TAP WATEK
LOW YOUDEN PAIR. UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATER WASTE WATER 1
AMPUL HO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
1
B.OO
8.33
6.95
10.40
7.b5
25.30*
7.06
5.21
8.35
10.70
6.57
0.00*
0.00*
6.21
10.10
7.15
2.97
11.00
5.52
0.00*
5.93
2
10.00
10.50
9.94
10.90
8.70
12.80
12.40
8.45
10.30
11.80
7.75
0.00*
0.00*
5.98
10.40
9.92
3.92
9.80
7.11
5.22
7.26
1
8.00
7.08
9.09
8.96
7.91
10. 80
7.41
8.13*
7.28
9.84
5.82
0.00*
0.00*
4.18
6.17
6.89
2.92
0.00*
3.36
6.96
5.64
2
10.00
10.60
9.26
10.50
9.72
25.60*
12.70
9.06*
8.13
10.10
7.67
0.00*
0.00*
6.06
10.40
8.03
9.59
0.00*
4.05
6. 09
7.65
1
8.00
6.56
8.25
7.38
8.49
7.04
6.32
8.03
7.49
8.50
6.70
0.00*
O.DO*
5.57
8.96
5.93
5.88
O.OU*
11.90*
17.00*
6.57
2
10.00
8.77
9.09
9.26
10.20
13.10
14.60
10.20
10.10
8.12
8.29
0.00*
0.00*
8.27
10.90
8.60
12.40
0.00*
35.60*
13.10
10.20
1
8.00
9.55
4.22
0.00'
11.60
10.30
8.12
8.41
8.30
9 09
8.68
0.00'
0.00'
5.33
6.30
0.00'
4.57
0.00'
7.68
12.00
4.08
2
10.00
10.90
14.60
0.00*
15. 3U
9.61
10.40
11.10
2.80
12.30
12.30
0 . 00*
U.UU*
6.41
6.94
1.25
10.30
0.00*
9.08
17.40
6.46
1
8.00
7.03
6.79
7.1;/
7.80
6.41
6.76
5.25
4.28
5.21
13.00
0.00
0.00
4.79
8.02
5.89
3.13
O.UU
13.50
6.96
4.58
WASTE WATER 2
2
10.00
8.73
8.70
8.98
9.47
9.73
7.82
9.8U
6.85
7.35
6.53
59.6U*
O.OU*
8.28
8.99
7.66
32
0.00*
22.70*
0.00*
6.06
WASTE WATER 3
1
8.00
6.77
7.04
.02
.58
.92
.23
.33
.73
.33
.20
0.00*
0.00*
5.27
7.32
5.74
9.28
O.UU*
3.74
3.48
3,64
2
10.CO
8.60
8.57
7.9<:
11.30
3.0/
9.56
13.60
7.73
11.40
O.OU*
O.OU*
0.00*
5.96
8.32
7,72
8.26
O.UU*
3.49
43.50*
13.90
-------
TABLE 37 (continued)
tn
u>
DISTILLED HATEH
r*UUJM YOUOEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
TAP WATER SURFACE WATER WASTE WATEH 1
WASTE WATER 2
WASTE WATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
3
80.00
57.40
82.80
64.80
71.70
66.30
89.30
162.00
73.40
80.00
142.00
117.00
0.00*
74.60
80.50
66.20
103.00
85.00
38.90
12.20
73.70
4
100.00
107.00
105.00
91.60
106.00
40.10
48.90
267.00*
86.20
106.00
160.00
158.00
0.00*
95.30
102.00
85.40
82.50
107.00
24.90
13.90
97.70
3
80.00
58.20
79.00
79.40
88.30
60. 50
92.30
237.00*
70.00
94.30
165.00*
98.50
0.00*
78.00
75.00
62.70
82.20
82.00
74.30
8.70*
RS.80
4
100.00
110.00
99.40
105.00
111.00
73.70
51. JO
312.00*
86.90
115.00
162.00
163.00
0.00*
91.80
94.00
74.80
109.00
41.70
97.90
13.90
104.00
3
80.00
71.80
81.50
54.00
92.10
60.90
7b.20
68.60
76.00
89.00
152.00*
114.00
0.00*
79.80
59.60
59.10
82.50
6H.20
65.10
10.40*
95.10
4
100.00
95.60
94.70
81.10
117.00
UK). 00
66.40
81.70
101.00
112.00
92.70
155.00*
0.00*
83.20
104.00
72.60
109.00
330.00*
81.00
19.10*
113.00
3
80.00
95.30
94.40
57.50
76.20
119.00
91.70
85.50
70.00
93.70
143.00
96.90
0.00*
86.10
79.10
50.70
83.60
94.80
10.00
3.48
82.90
4
100.00
117.00
134.00
66.40
100.00
312.00*
41.10
94.70
94.30
124.00
165.00
lll.OJ
o.uo*
105.00
104.00
63.10
88.40
115.00
127.00
12.20
111.00
3
80.00
86.00
74.40
60.50
82. HO
38.10
61.90
29.40
60.60
83.00
153.00
120.00
0.00*
77.50
82.70
59.70
74.10
109.00
61.90
13.90
63.50
4
100.00
103.00
103.00
78.50
102.00
97.10
59.50
92.20
83.40
106.00
178.00
151.00
0.00*
91.20
111.00
75.50
91.90
165.00
81.90
15.70
83.30
3
80.00
85.10
99.40
68.60
83.00
82.20
76.10
72.40
102.00
87.90
153.00
113.00
0.00*
79.70
86.80
50.60
68.80
0.00«
154.00
11.30
128.00
4
100.00
118.00
91.50
97.20
110.00
117.00
44.40
93.40
103.00
84.90
160.00
112.DO
0.00'
s; .60
113.00
68.40
8B.70
98.80
91.10
12.20
172.00
-------
TABLE 37 (continued)
OISTl: LEO WATER
TAP WATER
HIGH YUUUEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATER WASTE WATER 1
WASTE WATER 2
HASTE WATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE COKC:
LAb NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
5
3J9.00
?«?.'JU
£/0'U
23:>.00
263.1)0
247 ,00
200.00
41)0.00
251.00
219.00
205.00
390.00
0.00*
304.00
259.00
243.00
290.00
290.00
233.00
662.00*
272.00
6
499.00
321.00
345.00
301. CO
333. UO
308.00
260.00
368.00
289.00
284.00
353.00
465.00*
0.00*
383.00
351.00
294.00
346.00
350.00
330.00
515.00*
347.00
5
291.00
281.00
259.00
287.00
261.00
241.00
298.00
408.00*
260.00
271.00
263.00
273.00
0.00*
318.00
247.00
219.00
285.00
300.00
221.00
184.00
306.00
6
499.00
324.00
335.00
350.00
334.00
335.00
300.00
704.00*
300.00
290.00
418.00
479.00
0.00*
377.00
273.00
296.00
363.00
360.00
270.00
625.00*
372.00
5
399.00
245.00
256.00
221.00
270.00
496.00
283.00
306.00
269.00
297.00
205.00
281.00
0.00*
322.00
234.00
210.00
277.00
330.00
240.00
515.00
359.00
6
499.00
344.00
J51.00
295.01)
333.00
631.00
373.00
341.00
323.00
369.00
332.00
473.00
0.00*
378.00
321.00
270.00
338.00
400.00-
294.00
588.00
455.00
5
399.00
290.00
260.00
237.00
284.00
242.1)0
285.00
320.00
234.00
301.00
200.00
349.00
0.00*
260.00
234.00
214.00
269.00
300.00
289.00
515.00*
384.00
6
499.00
336.00
36H.OO
26b.OO
356.00
301.00
357.00
451.00
201.00
395.00
335.00
368.00
O.UO*
339.00
293. UO
271. no
347.00
250.00
321.00
662.00*
408.00
5
399.00
254.00
332.00
228.00
268.00
232.00
280.00
338. OU
255.00
311.00
232.00
315.00
0.00*
287.00
247.00
205.00
24/.00
4bU.UO
95.40
551.00*
259.00
6
499.00
357.00
396.00
302.00
335.00
268.00
314.00
376.00
263.00
385.00
342. UO
432.00
0.00*
370.00
348.00
282.00
308.00
470.00
247.00
588.00*
326.00
5
399.00
295.00
279.00
219.00
264. UO
243.00
429.00
440.00
279.00
227.00
256.00
427.00
0.00*
273.00
252.00
192.00
271.00
350.00
635.00
441.00
632.00
6
499.00
339.00
2*0.00
-------
TABLE 38. RAW DATA FOR METHYLENE CHLORIDE ANALYSIS BY WATER TYPE
DISTILLED WATER
en
en
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
1
8.00
7.36
7.70
6.56
8.00
7.21
9.43
8.60
3.45
7.22
1.65
2.81
5.67
5.05
11. 20*
7.34
16.80*
0.00*
2.95
11.40
9.60*
2
10.00
10.40
6.20
8.36
10.80
9.62
*
11.00
5.23
11.80
2.36
4.10
6.75
10.10
13.40*
9.64
13.90
0.00*
3.67
191.00*
16.50*
1
8.00
7.89
5.99
12.00
10.60
7.01
7.92
9.04
4.12*
6.38
0.14
4.28
5.24
7.45
10.40
7.71
4.82
1.80
1.81
37.00*
0.00*
TAP WATER
2
10.00
LOW YOUDEN PAIR, UNITS - 'JG/L
SURFACE WATER WASTE WATER I
I
10.00
9.98
9.06
13.40
16.20
26.50*
*
8.37
5.78*
11.30
2.65
5.86
5.61
13.70
9.00
8.01
9.05
3.20
0.86
8.34
0.74
1
8.00
7.71
8.30
6,48
13.20*
2.58
7.17
6.24
3,57
6,44
1.76
12.60
4.82
4.C5
9.30*
6,95
9.02
1.30
0,00*
U.OO*
3.73
2
10.00
10.20
7.80
8.83
17.20*
O.UO*
*
6.76
5.71
7.70
2.49
15.50
6.22
9.01
16.50*
10.90
1.72
2.30
0.00*
17. bO
6.18
1
8.00
9.49
6.55
6.17
7.51
0.00'
10.40
6.92
4.23
7.25
1.56
3.74
5.69
4.85
11.40
8.04
4.57'
4.34
6.23
46.70'
5.f3
11.40
6.33
8.89
12.00
5.00
*
9.29
5.09
8.03
75
29
16
11.10
12.80
9.42
4.87*
5.95
7.93
11.80*
8.90
WASTE WATEH 2
1
8.00
10.10
5.74
6.00
8.49
12.60
11.10
9.83
5.10
7.23
1.45*
4.77
4.80
3.67
11.50
7.32
.12
.20
WASTE WATEK 3
5.
5.
12.20
8.73
5.51
2
10.00
9.00
7.79
10.00
1C. 30
15.60
•*
10.00
7.18
8.37
3.83*
6.26
6.40
9.57
13.20
10.80
71.80*
7.10
10.10
6.93
7.54
1
8.00
9.72
7.10
5.18
8.81
17.90
9.82
7.53
5.65
6.92
1.42
5.28
12.70
2.79
10.90
0.00*
12.70
4.53
5.32
197.00*
5.ai
2
10.00
10.70
7,72
7.06
9.68
10. «0
7.60
6.82
10.60
2.95
6.33
9.04
7.67
11,20
O.OO1
22.40-
13.40
5.97
0.00'
6.99
-------
TABLE 38 (continued)
D5STILLEO WATEH
MEDIUM YOUDEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
TAP WATEK SURFACE WATEH WASTE WATEH 1
WASTE WATER 2
HASTE WATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TKOE CONC:
LAS NUM3EK
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
IB
'••i
2U
3
40.00
41.70
38.70
53.60
39.60
35.40
37.50
33.70
Z8.50
42.30
25.10
29.20
31.30
42.60
49.20*
42.20
24.40
23. 7!)
17.80
0.00*
4*>.40*
4
50.00
53.10
44.70
49.40
48.20
45.50
47.90
38.60
34.00
56.90
35.00
52.00
34.50
48.80
54.20*
52.60
28.80
36.90
24.90
0.00*
68.10*
3
40.00
42.50
35.50
59.00*
36.60
38.40
39.60
32.60
28.50*
46.30
28.20
29.70
31.30
43.40
44.00
40.70
79.40*
33.40
35.80
33.10
29. 4C
4
50.00
50.70
45.70
47.10
46.60
45.50
45.80
36.30
33.20*
59.20
33.60
44.10
36.30
52.00
51.10
50.50
34.2U
46.00
34.40
50.60
46.50
3
40.00
42.30
29. bO
39. HO
51.30*
3/.70
35.10
33.00
24.80
43.80
21.90
43.60
41.60
44.40
48.90*
4fc.lO
29.10
29.00
0.00*
0.00*
49.80
4
50.00
50.90
38.80
37.10
56.00*
48.50
40.60
50.60
31.90
55.90
35.90
41.40
44.50
55.90
57.90*
54.20
36. 6U
43.60
0.00*
0.00*
63.30
3
40.00
4?. 00
33.20
36.60
48.70
34.70
40.60
31.70
31.30
42.40
25.00
26.00
29.20
40.70
45.fio
4/.3U
20.20*
39.20
6 2. HO
48.20*
51.00
4
50.00
58.20
42.20
38.40
58.40
54.70
52.10
43.50
41.80
50.70
36.50
41.50
38.10
53.10
50. 2U
5H.20
23.30*
50.90
60.20
56 . 60*
60.20
3
40.00
45.20
30.80
39.70
40.40
14.60
35.40
31.90
30.80
45.30
25.00*
27.30
3b.70
66.70
6!. 00
46.60
24.20
52.80
2^.00
36.40
147.00*
4
50.00
56.10
41.50
38.80
53. bO
20.70
4H.90
3H.40
51.70
57.00
37.50*
41.90
36.20
51.20
58.20
67.10
5H.80
6, '.SO
46.30
18.40
65.00
3
40.00
36.10
33.70
62.00
43.80
33.20
37.50
24.50
26.70
38.10
30.80
31.40
103.00'
58.50
47.70
34. «0
41.60
51.90
37.90
11.70
47.30
4
50.00
47.20
40.50
27.50
55.30
'.6. 30
45.80
29.60
34.80
54.20
40.80
40.10
23.00
57.50
61.80
57.90
27.10
62.90
51.90
36,20
79.00
-------
TABLE 38 (continued)
D'STILLED WATER
TAP WATER
HIGH YOUDEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATEH WASTE WATER 1
WASTE HATER 2
WASTE WATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
5
401.00
459.00
410.00
346.00
423.00
261.00
364.00
502.00
385.00
498.00
434.00
322.00
303.00
350.00
450.00*
421.00
136,00
370. Ot;
218.00
337.01'
758. 00-
6
501.00
540.00
412.00
504.00
510.00
376.00
424.00
556.00
407.00
681.00
497.00
446.00
385.00
583.00
564.00*
525.00
152.00*
405.00
501.00
449.00
1120.00*
5
401.00
445.00
374.00
467.00
429.00
288.00
408.00
503.00
291.00*
555.00
413.00
340.00
327.00
376.00
466.00
423.00
145. UU
3UO.OO
351.00
4)4.00
710.00
6
501.00
493.00
254.00
568.00
520.00
410.00
424.00
459.00
418.00*
661.00
529.00
402.00
431.00
530.00
579.00
529.00
115.00*
430.00
459.00
b43.00
989.00*
5
401.00
477.00
329.00
397.00
433.00*
391.00
378.00
510.00
302.00
463.00
427.00
348.00
415.00
347.00
454.00*
441.00
82.50*
377.00
360. 00*
298.00
915.00*
6
501.00
521.00
424.00
537.00
539.00*
563.00
331.00*
531.00
521.00
502.00
544.00
486.00
518. UO
538.00
564.00*
551.00
91.20*
423.00
488.00*
459.00
1150.00*
5
401.00
243.00
280.00
364.00
376.00
301.00
439.00
550.00
311.00
467.00
'4.38.00
345.00
434.00
347.00
173.00
451.00
80. bO*
39b.OO
451.00
492.00"
940.00*
6
501.00
338.00
487.00
386.00
482.00
410.00
4U6.00
513.00
329. CO
b84,OU
522.00
417.00
522.00
553.00
516.00
^69.00
76.60*
442. CO
565,00
563.00*
1220.00*
5
401.00
255.00
134.00
393.00
388. CO
319-00
"f.2.00*
4C5.00
300.00
477.00
364.00*
3 58. 00
337.00
356-00
OC1.UO
456.00
64.70*
460.00
433.00
418.00
843.00*
6
501.00
356.00
447.00
637.00
465.00
454.00
398.00
535.00
423.00
56C.OO
40c.no*
449.00
521.00
537.00
472.00
556.00
65.50*
48S.OO
641.00
595.00
1170.00*
5
401.00
192.00*
337. Ol)
447.00
392.00
304.00
403.00
430.00
361.00
44b.OO
417.00
3*1.00
420.00
334.00
429.00
434.00
69.611"
39T-00
392.00
359.00
876.00*
6
501.00
302.00
375.00
557.00
498.00
409.00
506.00
454.00
3b7.00
612.00
442.00
470.00
5(16.00
5113.00
il7.00
b_'2.UO
74.10*
450.00
t 70. 00
Vb.OO
11*0.00*
-------
TABLE 39. RAW DATA FOR 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ANALYSIS BY WATER TYPE
AMPUL NO:
THUE CONC:
I) I STILLED WATER
TA? WATER
1 2
8.00 10.00
LOW VOUDEN PA1K, UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATER WASTE WATER I
e.oc-
2
10.00
1 2
8.00 10.00
WASTE WATEK 2
1
8.00
2
10.00
WASTE WATEH 3
1
8.00
2
10.CO
CD
LAB NUrtBER
1
2
3
4
J.
6
7
8
^
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Ib
19
20
6.70
6.85
9.86
7.76
7.66
7.62
3.89
5.42
6.20
0.55*
5.21
5.30
5.72
5.79
7.32
8.19
0.00*
6.80
14.60*
7.73
9.05
7.9\
12.60
10.20
9.33
*
7.46
6.53
9.56
0.82
6.6S
6.79
10.60
8.57
9.31
8,67
2.00
7.66
7.17
9.94
6.98
4.28
9.75*
8.10
7.08
7.30
6.02
5.29
5.12
0.48
5.31
6.05
6.48
7.52*
6.66
6,08
1.90
4.44
7.75
2.32
8.61
7-04
13.30*
10.20
9.29
*
8.72
8.65
8.70
0.99
6.96
6.b5
10.90
11.20*
8.44
8.07
4. JO
5.80
5.26
4,27
7.47
6.07
2.71
K.67
8-28
b.35
3.9-5
4.. '2
5.34
1.00
b.4b
5.75
ii.44
7.28
7.31
7.58
2.80
5.98
6.28
7.22
9.00
6.13
8.82
10.50
10. /O
a
6.76
6,63
6.43
0.7,'*
7.41
7.24
li.OO
11 . < '0
10.30
7.23
4.70
7.73
8.78
3.77
6.45
5.02*
/.U4
8.07
8.. '8
8.73
4.59
7.04
6.48
0.56*
6.01
7,'jy
6.92
9.07
8.3b
5.!3i*
b.7L
4.23
7.23
7.81
9.25
4.17*
H.61
10.20
10.80
*
7.87
6.84
7.17
0.96
8.71
1.39
12.00
4.88
!O.IO
b.95*
7 .J3
5.88
7.C1
10.30
8 . i 1
3.63*
6.30
8.42
9,31
8.57
9.32
5.63
b.41
0.65
5.73
5.55
4.47
S.46
7.91
4 . 7 'i k
6.20
13.40
7.58
7.50
8.26
6.79*
8.17
1T.40
1 1.4Q
*
9.57
;o.ro
8.12
1.1!*
8.3^
fe.67
11.70
10. 6U
10.90
t.OO"
8.21)
23. bO*
8.54
9.30
8.90
5.85
6.0«
8.22
8.43
8,41
7.93
6.<<3
5.96
U.GU*
6.75
7,39
6.44
7.44
R.'i?
9.?0
5.67
5.<>4
6.78
9.50*
9.03
7.24
8.38
10.60
10.90
*
7.17
6.74
9.62
0.96'
8.37
9.07
l'J.^0
4.48
10. ^0
6,f>2
6. 5b
5.90
7.17
11. 6C*
-------
TABLE 39 (continued)
Ul
vo
DIST1UEO WATEH
MEDIUM YOUOErl PAIR, UNITS - Ufi/t
TAP WATER SURFACE WATEH WASTE WATEH 1
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
3
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
3
40.00
39.80
34.20
50.40
35.70
35,00
35.10
52.90
34.60
36.70
21.10
33.90
30.60
42.50
42.30
37.10
35.60
31.20
53.50
39.10
3
-------
TABLE 39 (continued)
DISTltlEU WATER
TAP WATER
HIGH YOUOEN PAIR, UNITS - OG/l
SURFACE WATEH WASfE WATEH 1
WASTE WATER 2
UAS'E WATER 3
AMPUL NO:
THUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
Z
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
5
400.00
435.00
320.00
361.00
395.00
336.00
274.00
363.00
380.00
506.00
415.00
323.00
321.00
354.00
442. 0
376.00
157.00*
393.00
475.00
403.00
404.00
6
499.00
470.00
429.00
574.00
481.00
417.00
375.00
413.00
390.00
659.00*
460.00
457.00
413.00
499.00
508.00
483.00
170.00*
450.00
492.00
509.00
524.00
5
400.00
437.00
317.00
480.00*
420.00
346.00
386.00
445.00
276.00
535.00
418.00
364.00
329.00
335.00
447.00*
386.00
163.00*
400.00
437.00
417.00
390.00
6
499.00
402.00
195.00
565.00*
500.00
432.00
410.00
418.00
387.00
664.00
485.00
433.00
427.00
476.00
528.00*
491. OU
162.00
450.00
483.00
519.00
482.00
5
400.00
45H.OO
283.00
418.00
420.00
314.00
381.00
360.00
275.00
400.00
486.00
?r;4.00
416.00
341.00
4 3D. 00
391.00
184.00*
410.00
387.00
380.00
4U5.00
6
499.00
444.00
348.00
573.00
511.00
137.00
4£5.00
419.00
367.00
4/4,00
544,00
485.00
515.00
45'i.OO
570.00
495.00
173.00*
462. C'U
5:4.10
5! t.UU
489.00
5
400.00
150.00*
237.00*
378.00
380.00
341.00
427.00
395.00
315.00
40/.00
427. UO
372.00
443.00
348.00
426. DO
439.00
i:9.()0*
4?0.00
4b2.00
4/2.1)0
408.00
6
499.00
223.00
349.00*
393.00
460.00
446.00
473.00
405.00
308. 0'J
61?. 00
408.00
'130.00
538. UO
'89.00
456.00
566.00
125.00*
469.00
5/2.00
'.)<-/'. HO
527.00
5
400.00
171.00*
288.00*
398.00
380.00
395.00
392.00
351.00
285.00
420.00
400.00
38i.OO
344.00
303.00
394.00
409.00
155. OU*
471.0H
42/.!)U
4.1 .'.CO
385.00
b
499.00
27(1.00
356.00*
644,00
15). 00
4H9.0C
415.00
369.00
390.0C
52 /.UO
364.00
463.00
523.00
492. CC
443.00
531.00
16C.OO*
bZ4,00
6T;.CO
V-3.00
495.00
5
4'JO.OO
171. CO*
311.00
450.00
JbH.OU
360.00
421.00
383.00
341.00
403.00
270 00
361.00
403.VJ
327.1:0
370.00
410.00
U5.00*
13G.UO
4?2.00
3.o.uO
43' .00*
6
499-00
245.00
326.00
559.00
46?. 00
439.00
t '3 6. 00
40'j.no
343.00
510.00
4"?. 00
4^.1 . ,0
4QO.UJ
465.0U
aQ'1.00
•5lC.i"l
121. J
4t5.': :
V,0..,j
- - I . . ! J
';'.{. JO
-------
TABLE 40. RAW DATA FOR 1,2-D1CHLOROETHANE ANALYSIS BY WATER TYPE
cr>
DISTILieD WATER
TAP HATER
LOW YOUDEN PAIR, UMTS - UG/L
SURFACE HATER HASTE HATEK 1
WASTE WATER 2
HASTE. WATER 3
Z
10.00
1
8.00
Z
.uo
LAB NIWBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
7.11
7.37
11.10*
8.61
7.84
7.79
5.38
5.29
5.74
1.64*
5.67
7.02
6.87
7.83
5.04*
9.86
2.«0
7.^1
22.70*
10.90
9.59
I' . 26
14.20*
11.10
9.61
*
9.36
6.92
11.20
2.36*
11.60
4.50
11.50
9.93
6.90*
10.86
4.30
12.90
10.60
13.10
7.65
7.45
8.61
9.56
b.29
6.47
7.83
4.92
21.80*
8.73
5.35
8.02
6.75
10.20
5.41
5.00*
3.70
0.00*
12.00
12.60
9.52
9.51
?4.50*
11.90
7.74
+
11.90
12.50
8.55*
2.41
10.40
10.40
10. bO
14.50
H.OO
6.71*
6.10
0.00*
9.72
15.30
7.59
5.62
8.92*
H.15
6.46
6.76
5.68
7.37
6. OB
1.7H
5.33
6.49
7.00
8.04
5.02
8.38
4.30
3.08
8.40
7.26
9.80
7.46
11.40*
10.30
12.60
*
6.48
10.40
6.76
2.31
9.41
5.10
12.50
12.50
1.2')
8.70
6.30
1.56
9. '32
9.34
3.53
7.30
6.86
0.00*
1 5 , yo
0.03*
10.00
61.41)
25.50
1.60
O.'JO*
0.00*
411.60
48.00
23.00
O.L'O*
6.bO
C.OO*
27.00
17.00
3.24
13.70
7.21
3.55
0.00*
f,
7. 30
37.90
12.30
O.UO*
C.OO*
o.nu*
32.10
2.0'.)
26.00
0.00*
H.H1
0.00*
31.00
15.00
P. 47
6.73
8.50
7.99
11.10
8.53
12.00
6.2d
6.99
2.34*
4. by
5.00
P. 69
9.7H
4.93
4.59'
13.1)0
13.00
8,77
7.67
8.42
7.04
11.10
10.00
14.00
*
H.H3
d. 66
90.40*
3.93*
8.02
6.75
14.80
11.90
7.68
•"..95*
U.OO
25.70*
J.16
1U.OO
o.oc*
0.00*
132.00
0.00*
20.10
72.00
25.00
189.00'
0.00*
0.00*
0.00*
19.00
0.00*
42.00
150.00
5.UO
4.00
O.OU*
O.UO*
0.00*
0.00*
37.00
157.00
0.00*
r\oo*
*
0.00*
132.00*
fj/.Mi
15.00
O.iiQ*
O.iiU*
0."'J*
52. On
108.00
5..U
7 . \ 1 1 i
O.Oi."
0.00*
(-.00*
-------
TABLE 40 (continued)
CTi
M
DISTILLED WATER
MEDIUM VOUDEN PAIR, UNITS - OG/L
TAP WATErt SURFACE WATER WASTE WATER 1
AMPUL N'J:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
fl
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
3
40.00
41.60
35.70
54. SO*
39.10
40.00
40.20
33.10
33.40
•M.OO
23.70*
37.40
49.70
43.20
47.70
?9.40*
3b.20
40.00
48.80
42.20
48.30
.1
50.00
50.40
42.70
79.60*
49.30
47.90
48.00
43. iO
41.00
58.80
30.80*
76.20
61.20
52.00
58.80
43.40*
32.40
55.80
65.00
49.00
60.50
3
40.00
44.00
33.30
44.90
37.10
35.60
41.20
47.40
37.10
67.20*
23.00
38.10
60.20
46.60
50.10
34.40
28.00*
41.00
21.90*
33.00
43.50
4
50.00
48.10
46.40
90.20*
47.60
42.90
48.00
53.30
46.50
79.80*
29.50
59.10
66.90
52.30
56.40
61.80
42.70*
51.60
41.60*
49.50
59.70
3
40.00
43.60
32.20
51.40*
42.80
44.10
37.30
32.30
31.30
42.80
18.30*
40.30
31.10
47.60
45.30
31.90
39.40
44.80
33.80
40.70
41.80
4
50.00
49.60
41.60
53.30*
48.70
52.00
45.10
49. 4(J
41.70
57.60
31.00
46.30
51.70
57.60
54.50
54.60
47.90
60.80
64.60
47.50
55.60
j
40.00
9.56
10.50
28.00
28.00
37.00
56.00
44.00
74.90
64.80
92.10
0.00*
0.00*
40.30
44.00
62.00
0.00*
-M.10
28.00
63.00
34.00
4
50,00
0.00'
24.90
10.90
30.00
56.30
39.00
64.00
38.90
61.80
43.50
0.00
2.00
65.10
54.00
52.00
3.70'
55.40
65,00
66.00
49.00
WASTE WATER 2
WASTE WATE« 3
3
40.00
37.40
25.60
49.90
35.50
43.80
32. JO
35.50
37.70
46.30
21.10*
38.10
42.10
47.30
56.50
17.10
32. 3 J*
23.00
4.33*
3f>.50
47.70
4
50.00
41.60
41.80
53,30
50. .00
54.00
48.00
11.60
49.30
58.60
27.00*
49.40
45.50
51.80
5%, 40
67.20
47.70'
26.00
7.25*
4*.f-0
57.30
3
40.00
0.00*
49.10
188.00*
0.00*
41.70
22.50
0.00*
228.00*
U.UU*
75.00
0.00*
0.00*
13.70
49.00
0.00*
31.. JO
0.00*
0.00*
o.cu*
0.00*
4
50.00
o.oo-
0.00'
32.00
u.oo
110.00
4/.00
12.00
394.00
49.70
40. ?0
0.00'
87.00
0.00'
71.00
0.00*
2.00
i.OO
o.oo-
o.no1
O.OO'
-------
TABLE 40 (continued)
cr>
DISTILLED WATER
TAP WATER
HIGH YOUUEN PAIK. UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATER WASTE WATEK 1
WASTE WATER 2
WASTE WATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
b
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
5
399. UO
450.00
320.00
442.00*
413.00
347.00
278.00
410.00
372.00
500.00
388.00*
323.00
431.00
371.00
467.00
3i7.00*
154.00*
440.00
470.00
385.00
445.00
6
500.00
681.00
499.00
627.00*
496.00
428.00
407.00
531.00
401.00
652.00
437.00*
446.00
638.00
547.00
559.00
385.00*
160.00*
490.00
465.00
488.00
617.00
5
399.00
452.00
312.00
537.00
422.00
352.00
391.00
546.00
285.00
580.00*
398.00
348.00
541.00
367.00
475.00
364. OC
155.00*
425.00
380.00*
377.00
475.00
6
£00.00
618.00
362.00
608.00
507.00
406.00
413.00
564.00
407.00
735.00*
452.00
397.00
658.00
515.00
600.00
38R.OO
149.00*
490.00
400.00*
504.00
578.00
5
399.00
506.00
220.00
450.00*
415.00
356.00
375.00
437.00
291.00
415.00
435.00
323.00
592.00
366.00
428.00
339.00
148.00
450.00
369.00
372.00
440.00
5
500.00
653.00
375.00
617.00*
51?. 00
432.00
413.00
565.00
410.00
517.00
438.00
469.00
670.00
b50.00
592.00
384.00
162.00*
513.00
494.00
504.00
539.00
5
399.00
28.50*
275.00
3/6.00
339.00
337.00
524.00
455.00
348.00
444.00
374.00
275.00*
651.00
366.00
500.00
250.00
56.10*
429.00
301.00
455.00
395.00
6
500.00
52.10
310.00
363.00
404.00
478.00
621.00
446.00
328.00
639.00
480.00
316.00*
8?8.00
584. UO
476.00
663.00
54.10*
'80.00
621.00
540. OU
542.00
5
399.00
154.00*
326.00
4;o.oo
375. OU
391.00
396.00
335. OU
290.00
427.00
348.00''
347.00
477.00
341. OU
427.00
333.00
152.00'
566.00*
394.00
424.00
43U.UO
6
500.00
225.00
374.00
666.00
449.00
465.00
423.00
421.00
404.00
530.00
386.00*
42b.OO
759.00
517.00
506.00
406.00
158.00*
57^.00
54/.00
542.00
540.00
5
399.00
0.00*
526.00
562.00
3b2.00
516.00
927.00
146.00
560.00*
459.00
475.00
233.00
474.00
81.90
552.00
331.00
5. CO
81'i.OO
0.00*
680.00
107,00
6
500.00
47.20
435.00
622.00
479.00
658.00
1000.00
171.00
510.00
61f-.:;0
53b.OO
0.00'
644.00
2.76
702.00
373.00
11.00
436.00
O.CO"
164.00
56.00
-------
TABLE 41. RAW DATA FOR BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ANALYSIS BY WATER TYPE
DISTILLED WATER
en
LOW YOUOEN PAIR, UNITS - 'JG/L
TAP WATER SURFACE WATER WASTE WATER 1
2
10.00
9.14
2.80*
16.50
6.88
10.10
*
15.10
7.78
12.50
2.57
11.40
0.00*
10.10
8.81
10.30
1.61*
7.30
8.75
12.2C
13.20
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
1
8.00
6.97
9.80
20.00*
10.30
7.38
13.30
12.30
5.15
5.84
0.90*
4.65
0.00*
6.99
7.30
7.24
6.74
0.00*
6.75
20.70*
10.40
2
10.00
9.14
11.60
15.60*
U.90
9.57
*
15.50
6.83
9.85
1.29*
7.19
0,00*
12.40
9.06
9.12
6.56
3.30
7:33
7.15
11.60
1
8.00
7.28
5.33
14.80*
10.40
9.29
37.50*
0.00*
4.20
12.30*
0.00*
16.70
0.00*
12.50
8.74 .
6.80
7.10
3.20
3.44
13.60
12.40*
2
10.00
9.05
10.70
19.40*
13.00
12.40
*
0.00*
9.80
23.10*
4.97
23.10
0.00*
26.10
13.50
9.20
8.60
b.10
5.74
11.20
15.20*
1
8.00
7.47
7.03
8.70*
9.20
8.07
10.80
12.50
0.00*
5.40
0.79*
5.84
2.85
7.15
7.91
7.33
6.34
3.30
4.63
7.12
7.47
2
10.00
9.38
8.58
11.40*
10.90
13.10
*
14.00
8.20*
6.68
1.23*
8.89
0.00*
12.90
10.50
10.30
4.89
5.70
5.61
9.55
9.42
1
8.00
7.03
1.54
13.50
4.36
7.82
20.00
14.80
12.70
11.40
1.03
6.78
17.10
1.37
7.81
8.22
1.16
5.10
7.00
13.90
8.20
WASTE WATER 2
1
8.00
7.78
3.30*
9.78
10.10
8.68
13.60
13.50
J.57
6.24
O.B6*
6.29
0.00*
7.98
5.86
8.30
WASTE WATEK 3
5.77
9.90*
2.10
7.75
7.59
2
10. CO
8.19
4.15*
11.90
12.10
11.20
*
14.10
11.70
8.10
1.53*
9.48
0.00*
17.60
8.16
11.10
3.64
12.40*
27.70*
7.80
10.40
1
8.00
21.10
3.90*
6.99
4.53
7.84
10.00
5.00
10.00
19.50
11.30
8.94
59.30*
0.70
6.21
8.87
13.60
9.96
18.00
8.97
12.20
2
10.00
10.80
4.28*
10. 7U
6.02
10.20
*
2.90
6.48
27.60*
2.24
11.70
66.00*
8.87
9.8>!
11.10
10.50
11.00
21.80*
9.44
13.10
-------
TABLE 41 (continued)
DISTILLED HATER
MEDIUM YOUOEN PAIH. UNITS - UG/L
TAP WATER SURFACE WATER WASTE W.'TEH 1
WASIE WATEH 2
WASTE WATER J
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
)5
16
17
18
19
20
3
40.00
45.90
45.60
73.60*
50.60
46.70
52.00
40.30
42.70
55-00
26.70*
45.70
77.80*
b5.60
54.60
47.60
47.00
47.80
69.00
54.10
62.10
4
50.00
59.20
49.90
94.10*
51.50
51.80
52.00
40.20
46.50
73.10
31. 40"
70.50
79.90
57.40
61.60
57.80
42.20
54.00
77.70
56.70
75.00
3
40.00
48.30
40.60
71.00*
42.40
45.90
54.10
53.20
45.30
76.70*
30.40
S2.10
65.60
33.00
58.30
56.50
32.80
49.00
48.30
44.70
72.00*
4
50.00
53.30
45.00
100.00*
47.00
52.60
51.40
18.00
49.10
87.00*
25.00
71.50
"•"•.40
67.90
58.50
62.40
55.80
59.50
54.40
58.70
79.90*
3
40,00
48.10
43.00
67.10*
54.60
45.30
49.30
41.10
36.20*
59.70
26.60*
53.00
33.60
56.80
r.4.70
58.10
55.90
56.30
41.40
51.00
59.00
4
50.00
57.70
50.30
64.00*
58.30
51.60
50.70
48.30
49.90*
69.80
i4JC5
51.90
59.50
64.40
62.60
65.10
59. 3U
65.00
5J.70
54. iO
69.30
3
40.00
59.80
13.70*
75.70
45. CO
49.30
45.30
29.50
60.80
4P,60
27.30
51.70
77.30
50.10
52.70
59.10
30.1D*
48.80
65.30
51.20
57.60
4
50.00
52.20
12.50*
54.10
48.30
54.20
60.00
28.80
50.70
59.90
34.90
52.20
117.00*
56.70
58.00
68.10
35.00*
58.80
79.00
60.30
60. ?0
3
40.00
50.20
19.60*
65.90
41.50
48.10
44.00
39.30
47.60
61.30
23. 8U«
51.40
55.00
30 . 00
€3.30
61. yO
51.20
75.00*
44. 30
42.00
57 30
4
50.00
52.10
22.40*
65.10
48.90
56.30
53,30
42.40
61.00
73.00
38.30*
57.80
39.00
62.90
56.40
78.00
54.80
83.20*
46.50
49.40
61.70
3
40.00
63.20
19.80*
72.60
51.00
43.90
16.70
25.00
57.40
47.10
24.30
55.50
73.00*
20.80
64.80
57. «U
42.4,;
54.40
43.60
51.30
57.80
4
50.00
63.60
22.70
3K.70
55.50
50. 5U
56.00
45.50
56.10
59.10
38.10
62. SO
78.30'
54.60
62.90
77.50
41.40
74.30
75.20
63.50
54.70
-------
TABLE 41 (continued)
cr«
DISTILLED HATER
TAP WATER
HIGH YOUOEN PAIR, UNITS - UO/L
SURFACE WATER WASTE KATER 1
WASTE WATER 2
WASTE WATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CUNC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
5
394.00
444.00
333.00
511.00*
427.00
353.00
300.00
334.00
366.00
503.00
364.00*
317.00
521.00
332.00
522.00
323.00
261.00
430.00
194.00
379.00
517.00
6
501.00
596.00
471.00
678.00*
535.00
445.00
410.00
443.00
398.00
663.00
404.00*
451.00
838.00
524,00
578.00
373.00
276.00
500.00
478.00
487.00
758.00
5
394.00
452.00
315.00
563.00*
442.00
345.00
386.00
456.00
283.00
569.00*
367.00
362.00
707.00*
361.00
492.00
325.00
262.00
440.00
396.00
371.00
596.00*
0
501.00
544.00
356.00
662.00*
530.00
444.00
386.00
403.00
404.00
735.00*
425.00
409.00
907.00*
521.00
595.00
425.00
227.00
500.00
446.00
487.00
750.00*
5
394.00
453.00
255.00
479.00*
439.00
356.00
373.00
404.00
286.00*
518.00
379.00*
330.00
719.00*
379.00
423.00
335.00
291.00
460.00
369.00
359.00
523.00
6
501.00
554.00
417.00
660.00*
546. '10
441.00
3tiO.OO
520.00
415=00*
528.00
389., 00*
483.00
848.00
591.00
583.00
429.00
224.00
528.00
474.00
487.00
655.00
5
394.00
224.00
249.00*
414.00
371.00
350. 0'j
402.00
408.00
324.00
535. OC
365.00
346.00
1190.00*
375.00
480.00
345.00
i66.GO*
431.00
680.00*
43?. 00
491.00
6
501.00
294. 00
320.00-
438.00
46rf.OO
449.00
446.00
452.00
318.00
809.00
457.00
410.00
1490. 00-s
506.00
546.00
462.00
1/1.00*
488.00
820.00
542.00
673.00
5
394.00
347.00
283.00*
604.00
38 3. CO
376.00
330.00
326.00
295.00
560.00
342.00*
356.00
634.00
338.00
432.00
333.00
249.00
521.00*
1110.00*
414.00
488.00
6
501.00
363.00
389.00*
718.00
470.00
472.00
395.00
4 06.Cn
412.00
701.00
385.00*
449.00
1020.00*
527.00
528.00
447.00
266, (.'0
574.00*
1680.00*
523.00
620.00
•j
391.00
224.00
233.00*
497.00
388.00
341.00
402.00
323.00
347.0C
548.00
''.26. OU
392.00
859.00*
328.00
4i2.00
343.0C
155.00
464.00
392.00
348.00
500.00
fj
501.00
29*. OU
352.00'
655. uO
504.00
417.00
439.00
477.00
350.00
736.00
479.00
522.00
854.00'
496,00
52',. 00
423.00
178.00
500,00
a??. 00
518.00
530.00
-------
TABLE 42. RAW DATA FOR 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ANALYSIS BY WATER TYPE
cr<
-j
DISTILLED WATER
TAP WATER
LOW YJUUEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATER WASTE WATER 1
AMPUL NO:
TRUS CONC:
LA8 NUMBER
1
2
3
4
b
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
1
8.00
7.28
7.40
1.64
8.89
*
8.85
7.60
7.63
9. S3*
3.09
*
1.95
6.54
6.76
7.36
12.60
0.00*
4.26*
44.70*
12.70
2
10.00
11.50
8.38
11.50
11.80
*
*
16.40
9.99
16.80*
4.17
*
2.13
11.70
8.16
9.43
15.50
0.00*
1.95*
14.60
13.50
1
8.00
7.88
7.29
8.41
9.87
*
7.66
8.bO
9.27
17.60*
3.93
*
0.00*
7.00
7.73
6.31
9.92
2.10*
0.72*
19.50*
13.60
2
10.00
11.50
9.8S
15.20
12.60
*
*
11.70
13.30
26.30*
5.06
*
0.00*
14.20
11.60
8.18
15.30
3.72*
4.96*
15.70
16.90
WASTE WATEH 2
1
8.00
7.46
6.53
7.U7
9.23
4
7.54
7.72
6.87
9.74*
2.68
*
2.86
7.06
7. 03
7.54
10.40
2.10*
4.83
12,70*
10.50*
2
10.00
11.40
8.79
9.12
11.40
*
*
12.30
10.10
12.80*
3.37
*
2.30
13.60
10.60
10.60
8.10
2.90*
6.50
21.80*
12.70*
1
8.00
15.40
2.13
0.00*
24.10
*
183.00*
0.00*
0.00*
45.70*
3.54
*
0.00*
6.53
29.80
0.00*
22.80
10.40
0.34
0.00*
13.00*
2
10.00
16.00
0.00*
4.00
30.80
A
*
0.00*
0.00*
29.20*
5.14
*
0.00*
8.83
21. 8C
0.00*
6.99
12.46
0.48
0.00*
13.00*
1
8.00
11.00
4.90'
5.79
9.04
9.67
12.30
7.72
8.65'
1.19
2.53
6,rc
7.22
7.55
9.72
2.00
2.50
17.90
7.93
WASTE WATER 3
2
10.00
3.61
6.12*
7.56
11.80
*
*
10.40
12.60
11.70*
3.40
*
2.68
15.00
9.68
10.90
6.39
14.60
26.00*
14.40
9.66
1
e.oo
0.00*
4.47*
0.99
13.40
*
8.69
14.60
18.00
21.50*
1.50
*
37,50*
0.00*
10.30
8.80
15.40
14.50
0.00*
15.10
5.70
2
10.00
0.00*
6.20*
7.15
15.10
•
*
5.90
10.70
41.10*
0.00*
»
64.50*
0.79
15.10
10.70
17.60
12. SO
0.00*
27.90
7.20
-------
TABLE 42 (continued)
CD
DISTILLED WATER
MEDIUM YOUDEN PAI!(, UNITS - UG/L
TAP WATER SURFACE WATER WASTE WATEH 1
WASTE WATEH 2
WASTE WATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONG:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
n
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
3
80.00
59.40
34. GO
70.60
57.20
*
60.00
80.30
76.90
111.00*
61.50
*
39.50
64.00
57.30
49.80
67.10
35.90*
40.80*
79.60
105.00
4
100.00
59.90
77.60
132.00
96.40
*
100.00
138.00
H7. 00
203.00*
89.80
*
124.00
93.80
106.00
84.00
59,00
45.60*
51.80*
137.00
1Z2.00
3
80.00
62.70
19.30*
71.40
56.60
*
64.40
51.50
84.20
152.00*
65.60
*
0,00*
63.80
60.80
50.60
42.60
40.50*
28.30*
58.50
If 20
4
100.00
67,60
7 6 '.50
138.00
135.00
*
96.70
90.20
120.00
231.00*
112.00
*
98.00
96.50
101.00
84.40
89.00
46.30*
41.70*
164. UO
128.00
3
80.00
61, 10
29.30
64.50
64.40
*
61.10
56.60
73.20
132.00*
57.30
*
61.50
61.50
57.90
57.00
J6.30
49.60*
42.90
75.70*
132.00'
4
100.00
65.50
70.40
9B.20
104.00
*
94,40
y9.10
107.00
211.00*
109.00
*
97.50
107.00
101.00.
H9.20
41.50*
35.10*
95.60
179.00*
205.00*
3
80.00
89.00
19. BO
25.00
74.40
*
C5.70
66.10
162.00*
201.00*
67.00
*
•o.oo*
56.80
75.10
0.00*
37.50
103.00
23.10
0.00*
255.00*
4
100.00
104.00
".8.70
37.00
H8.00
*
111.00
9G.OO
131.00
232.00*
94.10
*
:io.oo
94.80
112.00
0.00*
46.60
141.00
3.57
0.00*
319.00*
3
30.00
71.60
24.40*
59.60
55.20
*
52.20
84.90
87.60
129.00*
C5.60
*
64.00
>5.20
71.80
56.80
52.00
58.10
28.00
62.20
126.00*
4
100.00
156.00
59 . 30*
S9.40
103.00
*
100.00
55.90
135.00
210.00*
92.00
*
78.00
'W.70
97.60
98.90
109. OJ
60.30
31.30
164.00
198.00
3
80-00
87.20
26.50*
64.20
59.00
*
04.40
50.80
87.40
94. 6')*
59.20
A
103.00*
57,80
122.00
52.80
61.50
1U6.00
28.50*
135.00
156,00
4
100.00
79.70
51.20*
57.40
104.00
*
97.00
176.00
135,00
'.87.00*
88.90
*
196.00*
79.50
108. OU
93.90
88.00
152.00
52. 9U*
218. UO
196.00
-------
TABLE 42 (continued)
DISTILLED WATER
TAP WATER
HIGH YOUOEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATER WASTE WATLH 1
HASTE WATEK 2
WASTE WATEH 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CUNC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
5
400.00
287.00
291.00
445. CO
429.00
*
306.00
631.00
532.00
826.00*
540.00
*
378. CO
342.00
471.00
336.00
147.00
165.00*
224.00*
582.00
598.00
6
499. oa
-------
TABLE 43. RAW DATA FOR C/S-1,3-D1CHLOROPROPENE ANALYSIS BY WATER TYPE
-j
o
DISTILLED HATER
TAP WATER
LOW YOUUEN PAIR. UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATER WASTE HATER 1
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
H
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
1
8.00
•
4.03
13.90*
2.89
4.89
2.56
3.02
7.54*
2.40
2, .25
3.62
*
0.00*
4.62
2.83
2.87
0.00*
0.00*
3.04
29.20*
4.14
2
10.00
5.18
17.80*
4.29
7.17
3.86
*
10.40
3.20
6.80
5.39
4
0.00*
8.34
3.81
4.00
0,00*
9.70
2.82
14.10*
6.09
I
8.00
4.21
16.50*
3,96
6.24
3.2.'
4.53
51.90*
5.34
0.11
0.56
*
0.00*
0.00*
3.29
2.H5
0.00*
7.40*
1.73
11.50*
a. 28
WASTE WATER 2
WAS'E WATER 3
2
1C. 00
5.22
23.10*
4.70
6.38
5.07
*
69,20*
6.68
14.20*
4.29
*
0.00*
5.75
4.57
3.79
0.00*
13.00*
3.19
8.42*
10.10*
i
8.00
4.26
12.90*
2.24
3.75
2.94
2.45
8.09
3.H7
1.68
2.93
*
o.oc*
4.88
2.51
2.97
3.12
10.40
2.57
11.20*
i.30
2
10.00
5.31
16. bO*
3.06
4.77
4.20
-t
9.45
4.94
2.12
4. SI
*
0.00*
9.06
3.95
4.88
9. 53
15. 6U*
3.58
12.00*
10.10
1
8.00
4.27
1.46
0.00*
6.60
2.80
0.00*
0.00*
2.09
5.41
4.83
*
0.00*
2.47
5.41
1.27
0.00*
10.40*
0.00*
39.90*
3.60
2
10.00
4.61
12.00
0.00*
12.20
3.23
*
0.00*
1.56
0.00*
6.74
i
0.00*
10.20
2.t>2
2.18
0.00*
16. 'JO*
0.00*
16.80*
7.06
1
8.00
4,52
10.60*
2.71
4.40
2.413
3.30
13.00
2.94
2.20
1.62
*
O.OC*
5.39
1.10
3,09
0.00*
15.00
7.14
9.28*
4.6U
2
10.00
5.41
14.40*
3.80
5.46
3.10
*
13.00
4.81
2.78
2.9«
*
o.ou*
10.5'J
2.44
1.63
o.oc*
?5.UO*
61.20*
14.10'
3.78
1
8.00
3.73
8.33
0.00*
2.85
3.07
3.77
20.10*
2.00
3.86
4.50
*
0.00*
G.15
2.53
1.50
2.88*
14.00*
0.00-
13.60*
8.20
2
10.00
10.50
10.20
0.00*
4.35
3.62
V
10.90
6.54
J6.0G
8.46
*
58.40*
17.20
2.94
2.92
l./O*
24.30*
O.OU*
17. UO*
6.10
-------
TABLE 43 (continued)
DISTILLED WATER
MEDIUM YOUDEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
TAP WATEK SURFACE HATER WASTE WATER 1
WASTE WATER 2
WASTE WATEK 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CUNC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
u
18
19
20
3
80.00
42.50
146.00*
35.50
28. SO
33.59
34.60
5P.50
33.30
45.10
44.00
*
123.00*
54.00
33.30
34.00
46.10*
79.00
53.40
148.00*
72.00
4
100,00
59.50
166.00*
52.40
35.20
39.30
42.30
58.80
40.30
66.00
57.80
*
123.00
64,90
*2.40
41.90
39.50*
211.00*
62.10
186.00*
109.00
3
80.00
44.80
145.00*
23.30
28.40
43.00
35.90
101.00*
37.30
47.00
42.30
*
0.00*
49.30
34.00
35.30
33.80*
73.00*
39.10
105.01)*
43.70
4
100.00
50.80
181.00*
51.00
36.30
40.80
43.60
125.00
43.30
62.30
60.30
*
114.00
62.90
. 38.60
44.10
53.40*
204.00*
46.80
162.00*
96.00
3
80.00
42.30
126.00*
35.40
29.70
32.10
34.60
46.60
33.00
42.40
43.90
*
45.40
59.80
32.90
37.20
8.26
84. Oi/
30.80
139.00*
70.10
4
100. CO
52.00
118.00*
33.80
J5.30
37.70
41. CO
63.10
39.90
56.80
63.90
«
83.70
71.90
42.60
44.10
7.66
2?. 40
50. to
165.00*
88.20
3
80.00
43.10
115.00*
45.00
33.90
29,40
32.10
35.00
53.10
42.90
50.80
*
84.80
49.10
34.60
34.20
0.16*
126.00*
28.60
162.00*
72.30
4
100.00
47.50
118.00
43.40
38.80
37.10
48.60
60.50
38.90
4b.90
59.. 50
*
114.00
£7,60
38.60
44,00
4.46*
190.1)0*
59.20
201.00*
46.60
3
30.00
99.80
103.00*
31.40
19.10
35.50
29.50
44. bO
:<8.40
40.50
43.20
*
97.30
96.30
39.00
38.30
4U.3U
0.00*
35.90
Ii4.00*
67.90
4
100.00
59.40
166. CO*
34.40
29.00
"0.90
42. 3U
49.40
43.20
56.60
55.60
*
52. 2C
69.00
39.20
49.00
19.90
52.00
33.90
156.00*
73. 20
3
80.00
49.00
S6.HO
31.30
30. DO
30.60
33.30
44.50
39-50
26.30
46.00
*
193.00*
83.60
40.40
32.90
0.00*
1JD.OO*
3 ,.50
142.00*
74.50
4
100.00
65.40
153.00*
27.00
38.10
40.10
44.90
el. so
47.10
41.90
66.90
»
187.00*
77.30
41.80
44.00
0.00*
201.00*
44.40
1*4. GC*
76.00
-------
I-e 43 (continued)
DISTILLED WATER
TAP WATER
HIGH VUUDEN PAH, UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATEK WASTE WATER 1
WASTE WATEH 2
HASTE WATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TKUt CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
n
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
5
4UO.OO
352.00
627.00*
181.00
138.00
152.00
139.00
179.00
196.00
267.00
342.00
*
435.00
253.00
214.00
165.00
82.00*
840.00*
253.00
1130.00*
336.00
ii
483.00
382.00
803.00*
236.00
164.00
175.00
198.00
262.00
206,00
346.00
390.00
*
1247.00*
377.00
229.00
203.00
83.00*
950.00*
226.00
1410.00*
447.00
5
400.00
388.00
583.00*
200.00
136.00
147.00
196.00
452.00
218.00
295.00
356.00
«
567.00
233.00
198.00
167.00
80.20*
850,00*
216.00
997.00*
293.00
6
488.00
3/3.00
670. OU*
240.00
166.00
171.00
198.00
349.00
206.00
373.00
409.00
*
804.00*
378.00
227.00
201.00
0.00*
940.00*
219.00
1490.00*
402.00
5
400.00
364.00
520.00*
165.00
150.00
150.00
190.00
216.00
149.00
154.00
307.00
*
?87.00*
243.00
183.00
173.00
150.00
880.00*
170.00
1280.00*
328.00
r
488.00
360.00
468.00*
227.00
171.00
174.00
205.00
239.00
213.00
196.00
•5U4.00
*
1020=00
423.00
236.00
206.00
32.40
1000.00
210.00
1490. 00*
410.00
5
100.00
190.00
577.00
347.00
128.00
142.00
205. 0'J
272.00
172.00
149.00
365.00
*
567.00
232.00
202.00
173.00
11.60*
782. OU*
26!. 00
1310.00*
314.00
6
483.00
352.00
627.00
147.00
1^9.00
180.00
241.00
255.00
161.00
215.00
456.00
fr
804.00
394.00
196.00
214. UO
12.50*
630,00*
338.00
1570.00*
413.00
•j
400.00
13-". 00
5t*5.90*
148.00
i ; 9 . ou
161.00
168.00
191.00
152.00
156,00
311.00
A
721.00*
227.00
175.00
176.00
13.50
884 . 00*
202.00
1030.00*
322.00
6
488.00
719.00*
639.00*
264.00
15^,00
174. 0'i
198.00
2.JO
3"/0.'JO
V
1130.00'
23b.OO
157. CO
rv.oo
7.77*
943.00*
189.nO
1050.00*
322.00
6
438.00
398.00
698.00
238.00
173. OC
207.00
241.00
27b.OO
169.00
202.00
347.00
1740.00
364.00
137.00
19?. CD
10.50
93?. 00'
715.00
1*80. OJ
301.00
-------
TABLE 44. RAW DATA FOR 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ANALYSIS BY WATER TYPE
AMPUL NO:
fKUE CUKC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
5
6
7
3
9
10
H
12
13
1'4
15
16
17
18
19
20
DISTILLED MATER
1
8.00
7.02
8.37
10,, 10*
TAP WATER
LOW YOUDEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATEK WASTE WATER 1
HASTE WATER 2
WASTE WATEH 3
7.37
5.33
7.70
22.40
0.87
5.35
1.&5
0.00*
0.00*
6.16
5.74
6.03
10.50
0.00*
6.80
23.20
8.53
2
10.00
8.96
9.74
12-70*
10. ?0
8.51
*
23,70*
3,94
9.50
2.35
15,40
0.00*
10.70
3.39
6.8f.
11.80
o.oc*
7.47
7.12
12.50
1
8.00
7.89
8.43
10.30*
8.51
6.07
7.70
19.60*
4.92
7.12*
1.1.6
7.11
0.00*
6.46
6.69
3.81
0.00*
c oo<-
3.'Jb
8.4i
2.93
2
10.00
9.66
11.10
1?.90*
10.40
10.20
«
21.00
9.tiJ
12.60*
1.39
16.10
0.00*
13.40
11.50
3.70
0.70*
1.204
6.31
5.21
5.38
1
8.00
7.64
7.99
10.60*
8.48
6.51
7.U5
20.90*
3.t)2
6.37
1.95
a . 9 1
0 Of v
7.1U
6.82
3.97
10.90
•J.UU*
6./H
6.51
6.42
2
10.00
9.58
8.27
13.10*
10.50
10.80
*
21.70*
9.16
8.74
2.3?
10.40
0,00*
i J.-'J
1 6 . ' 0
6.49
9. ID
1 . i J*
7.38
8.23
8.33
1
8.00
5.30
3.14
4.07
o.on*
41.60
56.70
1.40
47.10
18.30
0,0'')*
0.00*
0.00*
70.30*
22.60
O.CO*
3.99
0.00*
O.UO*
8.5<;
11. yo
2
10. (10
0.00*
2.48
10.40
6.32
3.92
*
9.60
19.10
'20.10
2.40
0.00*
0.00*
121.00*
2.20
0.09*
4.40
2.00*
c.ou*
7. 7y
0.00*
1
8.00
7.85
7.40
11.10*
8.06
li.bO
8.85
18. iO*
4.59
3.64
1.75
12.00
0.00*
5.56
7.72
2.84
6.33
3.50*
9.20
7.70
6.41
2
10.00
7.38
10.60
14.10
1C. 40
10.20
20.60
10.30
4.90
2. IS
lt.40
0.00'
54.40
7.82
6.02
4.06
4.60'
44. 70*
6.23
8.28
1
8,00
8.68
5.52
10.90
8.27
12.80
8.69
21.20
14.70
5. .3
1.97
15.20
0.00*
7.71
7.40
3.30
1H.OO
2.'7*
2.72
8.40
7.bO
?
10.00
9.69
8.18
16.00
10.30
10.00
•
21. 2G
4.69
19.50
2.18
16. HO
0.00*
16.00
7.90
5.91
9.94
2.P2*
3.19
7.65
B.20
-------
TABLE 44 (continued)
DISTILLED WATER
MEDHJK YOUDEN PA!HC UNITS - UG/L
TA= HATER SURFACE PATER WASTE WATEP 1 WA^TE HATtR 2 WASTE HATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUHPER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
IS
17
18
19
20
3
80.00
80.60
72.10
lib. 00*
77.20
65.70
79.50
79.40
53.30
70.40
41.00
53.80
95.30
7/.30
87.40
64.70
63.00
20.00*
116.00
87.30
96.20
4
100.00
100.00
107.00
164.00*
96.80
63.50
95. 20
102.00
56.60
108. CO
57. SO
122.00
92.70
89.20
ni.oo
82. CO
58.70
25.90*
144.0')
108. ijO
136.00
3
80.00
83.80
75.50
126.00*
6?. 20
68.50
80.10
58.30
50.20
109.00*
45.40
63.30
60.40
80.70
80.90
62.00
54.30*
21.00*
65.40
57.80
97. 7C
4
100.00
103.00
106.00
156.00*
88.60
08.90
98.80
76.20
68.70
146.00*
80.90
121.00
73.60
102.00
82,40
79.50
78.60*
2P.40*
88.50
80.80
122.00
3
80.00
83.6'.)
82.6U
119.00*
75.. '0
64.6?
70.50
7b.60
46.10
°8.00
34.t>0
85.00
38.10
9 1 . 90
80.8'.'
62.00
77.10
38.00*
69.40
81.70
109.00
4
100.00
98.30
80.10
132.00*
93.80
67. ^0
89.20
110.00
59.80
131.00
65.81'
104.0(1
74. h
iOb.i:;
9U "J
80. M>
91. bO
28.10"
107.GU
96.71'
145.00
3
80.00
43. MO
'o.;o
9n.tM;
66.60
41. JO
79, .V
07 , ,ji;
1 c:"* ' ,'. '•
a3.30
'fe.oo
58.70
n.'i' -
1 a./o
110.00
64.80
4T.60
107.00
',2.10
104.00
0.00*
187.00*
'Jl.SO
34.30
53.00
29,90*
H8.20
11)7.00
1HO.OO*
3
80.00
83.00
56.20
117.00*
54.70
66.80
71.10
52.10
57.00
93.00
a/,90
/0.40
17.60
H3.00
105.00
60.10
60.50
25.80*
75.30
74. 80
109.00
4
100.00
105.00
109.00
132 00"
?9.00
67.70
Q6.40
81.20
74. GO
129,00
43.20
105.00
14.30
100.00
77. 6U
83.30
96.30
34.90*
98.30
93.90
140.00
1
80.00
97.90
76.90
124.00
81.00
55.20
77.10
59.10
73.70
77.50
48.50
66.40
1Z5.UO
10S.OO
83.70
56.90
77.10
27.00*
74.70
84.10
113.00
4
100.00
128.00
67.50
38.00
103.00
94.70
101.00
69.60
63. 6U
109.00
43.50
119.00
64.60
93.90
106.00
00.30
88.40
37.10*
110.00
115.00
139.00
-------
TABLE 44 (continued)
DISTILLED WATEK
HIGH YUUDEN ,'AIR, i'MTS HG/L
TAP UATEn SUKFACE WATEK WASTE WATER 1
WASTE W.'-fEK 2
WASH WATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAP NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
S
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
5
400.00
388.00
432.00
522.00*
402.00
35o.cn
262.00
425.00
402.00
499.00
371.00
232.00
0.00*
342.00
516.00
320.00
191.00
86,30*
509.00
353.00
•;8o.oo
6
499.00
538.00
436.011
671.00*
483.00
358.00
396.00
533.00
413.00
597.00
417.00
550.00
510.00
493.00
813.00
408.00
207.00
140.00*
473.00
525.00
588.00
5
400.00
430.00
345.00
591.00*
402.00
312.00
351.00
515.00
276.00
638.00*
332.00
245.00
446.00
360.00
557.00
317.00
190.00*
115. OU*
356.00
365.00
500.00
6
499.00
515.00
378.00
698.00*
499.00
326.00
396.00
598.00
380.00
821.0H*
423.00
491.00
567.00
490.00
836.00*
398.00
195.00*
15C.OO*
460.00
439.00
623.00
5
400.00
414.00
288.00
510.00*
390.00
339.00
306.00
451.00
287,00
457.00
436.00
269.00
474.00
371.00
602.00
31/.00
173.00
120.00*
337.00
430.00
564.00
6
499.00
508.00
405.00
689. UO*
•319.00
3i\.00
••o?.oo
51 I . C '.j
<• jti.'j'J
+•)> .K
4/7.00
J- P vi '^
64S.GO
653.00
31'XfiO
337,00
212.110
l?f! 00*
463.00
556. 'jO
703.00
5
400.00
181.00
299.00
440.00
348.00
401.00
457.00
n:,6.00
422.00
435.00
387.00
217.00
910.00
395.00*
660.00
271.00
108.00
124.00*
511.00
452.00
61'j.OO
6
499.00
418.00
36^.00
459.00
386.00
506.00
509.00
t.^a.oo
391.00
691.00
404.00
292.00
1240.00*
654.00*
554.00
34b.OO
124.00
89.70*
632.00
514.00
736.00
5
400.00
496.00
320.00
475.00*
340.00
331.00
376. UO
295.01.
306. OU
385.00
294.00
306.00
4?9.00
339.00
483.00
306.00
,l'3.00
120.00*
362.00
212.03
568. UU
6
499.00
719.00
3o 1.00
7 :-1.00*
403.00
336.00
409.00
469.00
454.00
546.00
494.00
". 1..JU
671.00
550.00
579.00
412.10
200.00
163.00*
524.00
586.00
705.00
5
400.00
575.00
/87.00
5b6.00
364.00
339,00
402.00
4J7.CJ
368.00
460.00
428.00
293.00
748.00
326.00
526.00
301.00
136.00
144. OU*
401. OU
38^.00
568.00
6
-------
TABLE 45. RAW DATA FOR 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE ANALYSIS BY WATER TYPE
OISTILLEU WATER
\ 2
8.00 10.00
IOW YOUUEM PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
TAP WATER SURFACE WATER WASTE WAFER 1
1 2
2
10.00
8.00
10.00
WASTE WATER 2
1
8.00
2
10.00
WASTE WATER 3
o
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
lb
19
20
7.81
5.62
11.80
8.74
6.82
8.48
14.10
5.15
8.41
2.44
0.00*
0.00*
5,65
b.34
4.32
12.10
0.00*
7.24
21.80
U.OO
8.73
6.86
12.40
9.31
4.47
*
12.60
4.45
10.10
3.4b
0.00*
0.00*
9,72
5.90
4.yo
1J.20
0.00*
5.94
3.00
1S.ZO
7.93
4.58
11.80
9.45
9.80
8.28
12.30*
5.29
3.85
0.98
0.00*
0.00*
6.91
13.65
5.51
11.00
0.00
2.66
5.00
0.00*
8.39
10.50
11.90
9.59
12.20
*
12.90*
11.60
10.60
3.32
0.00*
0.00*
8.36
11.70
4.55
17.80
0.00*
6.66
6.00
0.00*
7.72
6.30
10.10
9.37
0.00*
7.41
10.80
5.29
7.01
2.58
0.00*
0.00*
6.22
7.69
4.73
11.60
0.00*
8.46
10.30
11.80
8.78
6.26
9.12
9.69
0.00*
*
13.10
6.25
7.14
3.79
0 . 00*
0.00*
10.70
12.40
7.38
8.28
0.00*
5.77
11.60
9.22
3.57
7.32
17,80
8.67
0.00*
16.30
10.60
5.20
9.76
3.14
0.00"
0.00*
0.00*
16.80
5.26
4.24
0.00*
9. '8
0,00*
6.90
1.97
7.84
23.80*
10.80
0.00*
*
6.50
4.90
8.40
3.9h
0.00*
0.00*
6.99
10.40
5.3>o
B.o7
0.00*
8.18
4.67
8.00
8.26
5.20
9.09
9.20
13.30
8.51
11. PO
3.23
6.63
2,35
0.00*
0.0 '3*
2.23
8.8?
4.52
7.-0
U.OO*
r.oo
6. 00
4.06
6. 35
7.12
9.16
•,.37
9.52
*
10.90
2.95
7.61
4.30
u.ou*
0.00*
3.73
7. 79
7.15
7.34
4.00
36. HO*
0.00-
5.66
9.72
6.19
7.47
9.04
33.50*
6.87
10.50
5.55
6.89
2.38
0.00*
0.00*
6.22
7.70
5. 20
12.80
0.0. J*
«..'?
14.6'J
••\5?
a. 66
5.12
7.0'J
8.30
21.10*
*
10.80
7.92
C.25
3.48
o.no*
O.U'J*
10. HO
7.32
6.92
9.5b
O.JII*
4,4%
1.33
7.119
-------
TABLE 45 (continued)
DISTILLED HATEK
MEDIUM YOUDEN PAIR. UNITS - uG/L
TAP WATER SURFACE WATER WASTE WATER 1
WASTE WATER 2
WASTE WATER 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
3
80.00
91.20
49.70
150.00*
75.70
61.80
80.90
76.80
57.80
77.40
36.80
42.10
0.00*
92.10
84.50
69.80
74.60
82.70
122.00
95.20
83. 3D
4
100.00
111.00
63.80
192.00
90.30
84.50
119.00
119.00
76.80
111.00
45.60
121.00
0.00*
107.00
125.00
93.50
65.50
106.00
160.00
108.00
114,00
3
80.00
90.20
68.00
133.00*
74.00
63.00
85.70
111.00*
67.50
87.10
43.10
50.60
0.00*
89.30
96.80
60.80
61.00
80.00
53.00
47.90
67.90
4
100.00
107.00
91.10
179.00*
87.70
87.60
124.00
118.00*
76.80
115.00
55.80
112.00
0.00*
100.00
97.50
81.00
93.80
71.80
106.00
91.00
94.70
3
80.00
91.50
66.60
128.00
85.50
147.00
83.30
87.70
56.30
83.60
35.80
67.60
0.00*
85.30
95.70
73.10
75.50
95.00
72.30
76.90
90.60
4
100.00
108.00
89.40
120.00
95.90
185.00*
114.00
94.80
73.10
113.00
57.80
83.90
0.00*
88.10
108.00
89.40
88.90
47.30
118.00
97.30
117.00
3
80.00
108.00
68.50
54.40
77.50
97.70
85.70
81.10
80.90
86.10
33.90
65.20
0.00*
78.90
81.00
71.90
52.70
71.30
42.80
93.20
94.00
4
100.00
81.30
86.90
47.90
93.10
69.20
120.00
91.40
73-90
107.00
4^.60
108.00
0.00*
83.90
110.00
99.00
58.00
98.90
129.00
8b.90
112.00
3
80.00
90.60
70.80
123.00
69.70
61.40
86.60
75.70
70.30
79.30
39.20
65.50
0.00*
94.40
128.00
68.20
67.80
393.00*
77.60
72.10
82.50
4
100.00
104.00
88.20
123.00
98.10
84.30
105.00
89.20
93.40
111.00
50.90
94.00
0.00*
83.20
83.30
92.20
84. OU
200.00*
86.30
41.70
99.00
3
80.00
93.00
74.70
144.00*
85.60
77.40
72.70
71.80
70.20
71.30
36.60
76.10
0.00*
97.20
79.10
63.70
71.60
74.80
1U4.00
58.50
H9.80
4
100.00
110.00
85.50
33.70
106.00
111,00
104,00
99.80
82.90
111.00
47.30
88.80
0.00'
76.10
144.00
95.10
66.50
115.00
157. 00
81.80
107.00
-------
TABLE 45 (continued)
ro
DISTILLED WATER
TAP WATEK
HIGH YOUDEN PAIR, UNITS - UG/L
SURFACE WATER WASTE WATER 1
WASTE WATER 2
WASTE WATEK 3
AMPUL NO:
TRUE CONC:
LAB NUMBER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
13
19
20
5
399.00
419.00
447.00
261.00
397.00
416.00
191.00
3b4.00
395.00
807.00*
365.00
198.00
0.00*
379.00
564.00
308.00
260.00
430.00
525.00
431.00
390.00
6
500.00
571.00
555.00
322.00
491.00
524.00
314.00
507.00
429.00
975.00*
395.00
480.00
0.00*
522.00
650.00
379.00
303.00
230.00
475.00
589.00
458.00
5
399.00
422.00
365.00
287.00
411.00
351. OC
210.00
451.00*
302.00
707.00
368.00
182.00
0.00*
99.40
505.00
301.00
257.00
440.00
316.00
475.00
365.00
6
500.00
521.00
435.00
336.00
510.00
628.00
372.00
578.00*
418.00
998.00*
412.00
380.00
0.00*
523.00
654.00
359.00
379.00
560.00
465.00
515.00
481.00
5
399. 00
432.00
341.00
233.00
426.00
595.00
210.00
450.00
315.00
412.00
445.00
270.00
0.00*
380.00
488.00
319.00
383.00
470.00
347.00
497.00
435.00
6
500.00
532.00
423.00
323.00
525.00
635.00
390.00
500.00
431.00
453.00
441.00
529.00
0.00*
537.00
502.00
390.00
381.00
260.00
459.00
591.00
524.00
5
399.00
541.00
350.00
216.00
389.00
342.00
284.00
485.00
343.00
377.00
350.00
197.00
0.00*
338.00
572.00
326.00
212.00
405.00
614.00
525.00
429.00
6
500.00
621.00
411.00
220.00
466.00
667.00
780.00
428.00
345.00
661.00
442.00
307.00
0.00*
517.00
555.00
404.00
239.00
517.00
794.00
626.00
616.00
\
5
399.00
456.00
352.00
208.00
375.00
369.00
216.00
320.00
333.00
398100
315.00
331.00
0.06*
306. 00 \
338.00 '
297.00
320.00
1820.00*
349.00
431.00
421.00
6
500.00
559.00
413.00
376.00
437.00
599.00
510.00
456.00
462.00
536.00
396.00
458.00
O.OO4
592.00
432.00
\ 387.00
\376.00
2340.00*
569.00
628.00
500.00
5
399.00
428.00
308.00
243.00
380.00
455.00
202.00
419.00
361.00
392.00
381. DO
258.00
0.00*
341.00
398.00
316.00
155.00
885.00*
449.00
*
414.00
6
500.00
520.00
429.00
326.00
482.00
538.00
540. 00
460.00
424.00
515.00
412.00
425.00
0.00'
521.00
561.00
340.00
231.00
586.00
587.00
616.00
541.00
-------
TABLE 46. LEGEND FOR TABLES 47 THROUGH 49
Mix #1
Analytes
TCFM = Trichlorofluoromethane
CM = Chloromethane
VC = Vinyl chloride
t-l,2-DCE = trans-1.2-Dichloroethene
1,1,1-TCE = 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
TCE = Trichloroethene
DBCM = Dibromochloromethane
2-CEVE = 2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
TCE2 = Tetrachloroethene
1,2-DCB = 1,2-Dichlorobenzene
BM = Bromomethane
CE = Chloroethane
1,1-DCE = 1,1-Dichloroethene
C = Chloroform
CT = Carbon tetrachloride
t-l,3-DCP = trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1,1,2-TCE = 1,1,2-Trichloroethane
BF = Bromoform
CB = Chlorobenzene
1,4-DCB = 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Mix #2
Mix #3
DCDFM
MC
1,1-DCE
1,2-DCE
3DCM
1,2-DCP
c-l,3-dcp
1,1,2,2-TCE
1,3-DCB
Dichlorodifluoromethane
Methylene chloride
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,2-Dichloroethane
Bromodichloromethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ND - not detected.
3NA - not analyzed.
:O.S. - off scale.
179
-------
TABLE 47. BLANK VALUES (\ig/L) - MIX #1
oo
o
Laboratory
number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
TCFH
ND
1
<0
0
NA
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0
ND
0
0
ND
0
<0
-------
TABLE 47 (continued)
CO
Laboratory
number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
B
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
TCFH
ND
1.62
<0.50
0
NA
0
ND
0
0
0
- o
ND
0.06
ND
0
0
ND
0
0.02
<0.06
CM
ND
ND
<0.10
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0
ND
0
0
ND
0
<0.02
<0.21
VC
ND
ND
<0.50
0.34
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0
ND
0
0
NA
0
<0.02
<0.13
t-l,2-DCE
ND
ND
<0.10
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0.05
ND
0
1.54
ND
0
<0.02
<0.11
Surface water
1,1,1-TCE
ND
ND
<0.10
0
0.39
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0.21
2.11
0
0
ND
0
<0.02
<0.10
TCE
ND
0.22
<0.10
0
NA
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0.21
ND
0
0
ND
0
1.08
<0.21
DBCM
ND
ND
<0.10
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0.28
ND
0
2.19
ND
0
<0.01
<0.14
2-CEVE
ND
ND
<0.05
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0
ND
0
0
ND
0
<0.08
<0.21
TCE/
ND
ND
<0.06
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
2.57
ND
0.15
ND
0
0.88
ND
0
' <0.01
<0.13
1,2-DCB
ND
ND
<0.10
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0
ND
0
1.41
ND
0
Nli
<0.4i
(continued)
-------
. TABLE 47 (continued)
CD
K>
Laboratory
number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Wastewater ttl
TCFM
ND
1.67
1.60
0.08
NA
0
ND
0
0.61
0
0
ND
0
ND
0.07
0.78
ND
0.28
0
<0.]0
CM
ND
ND
<0.15
0.15
0
ND
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0.47
ND
0
0
ND
0.82
0.72
<0.81
VC
ND
ND
1.71
0.59
0
ND
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0.05
ND
0
1.45
NA
0.04
0
<0.12
\t-l,
\ 5
1
Vo
\0
'p
D
Nii.
C>
0
0
0
ND
0
ND
0
0
ND
4
0
<0
2-DCE
,76
.24
.06
.20
I
i
•,
sv
\
\
.4d
'(
\
-12 \
',
. 58 '.
.56
.14
1,1,1-TCE
8.27
0.81
2.29
i.24
28.5
2.81
3.77
0
-£270
3.40
2.84
4.36
10.9
4.8j.
4.84
2.23
9.30
1029
6.35
10.7
TC£
ND
7.47
2.85
3.68
NA
3.86
8.02
4.97
11.3
11.1
3.52
29.1
8.68
4.63
6.27
5.22
4.23
0.74
14.5
14.7
DBCM
ND
3.68
<0.05
4.27
2.68
4.27
8.35
0.43
13.3
5.40
5.4S
ND
11.6
3.06
5.24
4.42
5.30
3.61
8.95
11.8
2-CEVE
ND
1.59
<0.40
0
0
0
ND
0
0
7.20
0
ND
0
ND
0
0
ND
25.7
0
<0 24
TCE^
ND
47.3
71.1
58.0
274
41.8
55.7
21.7
56.5
0
66.4
224
68.6
58.7
46.5
51.5
73.6
364
90.5
54.1
1,2-DCB
ND
5.50
1.46
10.2
8.03
4.18
23.2
0
7.54
10.2
0
ND
0
9.88
5.16
6.69
ND
22.6
NA
<0.44
(continued)
-------
TABLE 47 (continued)
00
U)
Laboratory
number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1C
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Wastewater #2
TCFM
ND
1.51
<0 . 50
0
NA
0
.
-------
TABLE 47 (continued)
CD
Laboratory
number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Wastewater #3
TCFH
ND
1.70
<0.50
0.18
NA
0
NO
0
2.49
(2.49)*
0
0
ND
0.04
ND
0
4.87
ND
0
0.11
<0.07
CM
24.4
9.85
<0.50
22.7
0
ND
19.8
5.16
15.8
(15.8)
0
6.17
ND
12.8
31.8
14.9
0
ND
21.7
19.1
11.9
VC
ND
ND
<1.00
0.62
0
ND
ND
0
4.26
(4.26)
0
0
ND
0
ND
0
17.0
NA
25.6
0
0.02
t-l,2-DCE
27.1
1.01
<0.50
0.21
0
0
ND
0
0
(0)
0
0
ND
0.30
ND
0
0
ND
NA
0.34
<0.07
1,1,1-TCE
18.2
6.91
0.&9
3.59
13.4
5.43
9.11
4.95
4.83
(33.8)
0
2.45
4.16
10.1
5.40
6.75
2.10
6.40
6.42
6.18
<0.09
TCE
ND
1.43
15.8
2.37
NA
0
4.45
2.49
3.48
'7.80)
0
1.28
6.48
0.79
2.54
1.82
1.29
1.70
1.80
4.43
<0.11
DBCM
ND
3.11
<0.50
4.19
3.04
0
6.75
3.67
5.97
(18.0)
0.35
1.97
ND
9.35
3.88
5.88
2.00
3.30
0
3.92
2.31
2-CEVE
ND
ND
<0.50
0
0
0
MO
0
0
(0)
2.61
0
ND
0
ND
0
0
ND
0
0
<0.20
ICE*
ND
ND
<0.50
0.71
0
0
ND
2.27
2.02
(2.02)
0.29
2.66
ND
0.51
0.70
0.37
2.16
2.90
0.34
0
2.11
1,2-DCB
ND
ND
<0.50
0.16
0
0
ND
0
0
(0)
0.08
0
ND
0.97
ND
0
3.24
ND
0
NA
<0.17
*First set of values for ampuls 1-2; ( ) set of values for ampuls 3-6.
-------
TABLE 48. BLANK VALUES (pg/L) - MIX #2
CD
en
Laboratory
number
1
2
3
4
C
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
BH
ND3
ND
<0.14
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0
ND
0
0.20
ND
0
0
<0.14
CE
ND
ND
<0.17
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0.10
ND
0
0
ND
0
0
<0.07
1,1-DCE
ND
ND
<0.09
0
0
0
ND
0
C
0
0
ND
0.05
ND
0
0
ND
0
0.66
<0.37
C
ND
ND
<0.04
5.57
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0.73
ND
0
0
ND
0
0
<0.0!3
Distilled water
CT
ND
ND
<0.05
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0.08
ND
0
0
ND
0
0
<0.06
t-l,3-DCP
ND
ND
<0.08
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0.12
ND
0
0.10
ND
0
0
<0.11
1,1,2-TCE
ND
ND
<0.05
0.41
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0.02
ND
0
0
ND
0
0.55
<0.08
BF
ND
ND
<0.16
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0
ND
0
0
ND
0
0
<0.19
CB
ND
ND
<0.11
0
u
0
ND
0
0
0
6.06
ND
0.30
ND
0
0.76
ND
0
0
<0.59
1,4-DCB
ND
ND
<0
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0
ND
0
0
ND
0
0
<0
.09
.63
.26
(continued)
-------
TABLE 48 (continued)
oo
o>
Laboratory
number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Tap water
BM
ND
ND
<0.49
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0
ND
2.68
0.30
ND
0
0
<0.18
CE
ND
ND
<0.07
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0
ND
0
0
ND
0
0
<0.11
1,1 -DCE
ND
ND
<0.10
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0.02
ND
0
0.76
ND
0
0
<0.34
C
ND
25.3
64.8
19.3
35.7
27.7
46.6
16.9
109
50.6
27.5
20.8
51.5
17.7
20.9
16.4
ND
22.8
7.25
19.9
CT
ND
ND
<0.05
0
0
0
ND
0
0
10.8
0
ND
0.32
ND
0.19
0
ND
0
0
<0.06
t-l,3-DCP
ND
ND
<0.08
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0
ND
1.52
0.51
ND
0
0
<0.11
1,1,2-TCE
ND
ND
<0.05
0.78
0
0
ND
0
7.24
0
0
ND
2.20
1.52
0.10
i.71
ND
0
0
1.92
BF
ND
ND
<0.16
0
0
0
35.1
0
0
0
3.20
ND
0
ND
0
0.23
ND
0
0
<0.19
CB
ND
ND
<0.11
0
0
0
K'D
0
0
0
5.77
ND
0.30
ND
0
0.21
ND
0
0
<0.63
1,4-DCB
ND
ND
<0.09
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0.63
ND
0.28
0
;:D
0
0
<0.30
(continued)
-------
TABLE 48 (continued)
CD
-J
Laboratory
number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Surface water
BM
ND
ND
<0.14
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0
ND
0
0.11
ND
0
0
<0.18
CE
ND
ND
<0.07
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
2.81
ND
0
0.84
ND
0
0
<0.10
1,1-DCE
ND
ND
<0.09
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0.04
ND
0
1.56
ND
0
0
<0.34
C
ND
ND
<0.
0.
0
0
ND
77.
0
0
0
ND
0.
ND
0.
0.
ND
-0.
0
<0.
04
06
4
22
16
04
34
05
CT
ND
ND
<0.05
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0.32
ND
0.01
0.16
ND
0.23
0
<0.06
t-l,3-DCP
ND
ND
<0.08
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0
ND
0
0.81
ND
0
0
<0.11
1,1,2-TCE
ND
ND
<0.05
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0.07
ND
0
0.03
ND
0
0.52
<0.08
BF
ND
ND
<0.16
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0
ND
0
0.05
ND
0
0
<0.19
CB
ND
ND
<0.11
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
4.45
ND
0.18
ND
0
0.18
ND
0
j
<0.63
1,4-DCB
ND
ND
<0.09
0
C
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0
ND
0
0.25
ND
0
0
<0.30
(continued)
-------
TABLE 48 (cortinued)
CD
03
Laboratory
number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
BM
ND
ND
<0.91
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
n
ND
0
0.34
ND
0
0
<0.20
CE
ND
1.28
<0.27
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0.40
ND
0
0.15
ND
0
0
<0.09
1,1-DCE
ND
3.24
<0.34
0.87
36.4
1.45
ND
1.55
3.02
0.96
0
ND
0.50
1.12
0.09
0.31
3.80
0
0
1.14
C
ND
4.11
2.35
3.31
4.66
6.35
4.92
2.95
6.17
0
5.98
4.23
11.6
4.18
2.72
2.76
4.30
1.25
5.19
4.04
Wastewater ttl
CT
ND
1.
1.
0
29.
0
ND
0
5.
0
0
1.
3.
ND
4.
1.
5.
8.
0
2.
92
58
7
57
59
19
93
89
50
49
15
t-l,3-DCP
19.0
1.14
227
0
227
269
10.1
163
365
0
0
ND
2.02
ND
0
240
ND
320
0
209
1,1,2-l'CE
ND
2
<0
1
2
2
2
0
4
3
5
21
3
1
2
0
2
0
3
13
.53
.19
.79
.01
.87
.71
.64
.32
.45
.32
.3
.52
.62
.73
.64
.70
.26
.0
BF
ND
383
<0
1
0
0
2
6
4
3
0
ND
10
-^
i.
J
0
5
0
0
5
.60
.21
.26
.78
.93
.63
.8
.01
.86
.82
.20
.12
CB
ND
1861
1120
1460
1653
679
1160
962
1681
369
1530
12009
1270
1580
1190
572
410
1648
1480
2000
1,4-DCB
ND
3.18
3.38
0
0
0
ND
10.7
0
0
0
ND
0.63
ND
7 .16
0.42
vn
U
0
<-0.34
(continjed)
-------
TABLE 48 (continued)
CD
Laboratory
number
1
2
3
4
5
r
0
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 ,
Wastewater »2
BM
ND
ND
<0.18
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0
ND
0
0.40
ND
0
0
<0.20
CE
ND
ND
<0.09
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0.80
0
ND
0.10
ND
0
0.41
ND
0
0
<0.09
1,1-DCE
ND
ND
<0.11
0
0
0
ND
0
0
3.48
1.84
ND
0.20
ND
0
0.11
ND
0
0
3.99
C
1.66
0.24
<0.05
0.71
1.38
0
0.75
1.12
0
1.36
2.63
0.70
l.?4
1.06
0.79
0.08
ND
0
0
<0.44
CT
ND
ND
1.61
1.08
2.29
0
ND
0
0
1 .32
0
1.81
1.12
NL
3.40
0.50
1.40
0.32
0
1.41
t-l,3-DCP
ND
ND
<0.10
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0.59
0
ND
0.31
ND
0
0.11
ND
0
0
<0.80
1,1,2-TCE
ND
0.42
1.99
1 ,69
0
0
1.09
0
0
0
0
ND
0.11
ND
1.39
0.56
ND
0
0
<0.08
BF
ND
1.92
1.84
1.86
0
0
0.61
0
0
0
0
ND
0
ND
0
0.64
ND
0
0
<0.18
CB
1.44
2.24
<0.14
1.80
0
0
1.00
1.53
5.06
0
29.8
ND
16.4
3.16.
1.40
1.87
ND
1.82
0
<0.12
1,4-DCB
ND
ND
<0.11
0
0
0
ND
2.14
0
0
0
ND
0.63
ND
0.42
0 09
ND
0
0
<0.36
(continued)
-------
TABLE 48 (continued)
Laboratory
number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Wastewater #3
BM
ND
ND
9.13
0
0
0
ND
8.81
0
(0)*
25.2
0
ND
0
ND
0
1.28
ND
0
0
<0.61
CE
ND
ND
<0.45
0
0
0
ND
0
0
(0)
0
0
ND
0
ND
0.16
2.39
ND
0
0
<0.27
1,1-DCE
2.51
2.18
5.56
2.66
13.0
0
3.35
3.55
2.61
(3.85)
0
2.59
2.27
3.98
2.37
2.13
2.47
ND
28.9
0
2.06
C
ND
26.8
32.1
21.9
27.0
25.9
17.3
22.4
4.53
(19.1)
43.2
23.5
25.6
42.9
20.4
22.1
24.2
20.7
21.3
26.8
1.85
CT
ND
0.42
<0.46
0
14.3
0
ND
0.36
0
(0)
33.2
0
1.68
4. 73
»-*-k
i*f
7.29
13.9
3.40
10.5
0
2.75
t-l,3-DCP
9.12
10.2
44.1
0
32.6
29.3
41.7
51.2
17.0
(88.8)
34.5
43.5
ND
113
19.0
26.1
19.9
ND
29.3
28.4
46.2
1,1,2-TCE
ND
1.66
<0.32
2.31
3.50
0
2.85
4.94
4.17
(9.81)
0
0
ND
3.30
1.62
3.09
1.76
1.30
0.63
0
6.86
BF
ND
3.33
3.67
2.07
2.62
0
i.79
11.8
1.70
(8.10)
0
0
ND
6.76
1.89
5.13
0.37
2.20
4.32
12.2
4.68
Cri
33.6
39.9
36.9
36.3
240
24.9
53.5
39.4
19.1
(38.2)
36.9
56.6
ND
61.9
33.9
28.4
28.1
25.0
0
25.8
26.9
1,4-DCB
ND
0.48
<0.28
0.14
9.56
0
0.27
8.77
2.35
(0)
0
0
ND
1.25
1.02
0
0.16
ND
0
0
<0.75
*First set of values for ampuls 1-2; ( ) set of values for ampuls 3-6.
-------
TABLE 49. BLANK VALUES (pg/L) - MIX #3
Laboratory
number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Distilled water
DCDFM
ND3
ND
<0.11
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0
ND
0
1.71
ND
0
0
<0.33
MC
ND
ND
7.54
0.65
0
0
ND
3.43
0
0
1.81
ND
1.98
4.37
4.76
2.66
ND
2.16
63.8
19.1
1,1-DCE
ND
ND
<0.23
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0.28
ND
0
0
ND
0
0
<0.11
1,2-DCE
ND
ND
<0.22
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0.15
ND
0
0.44
ND
0
0
<0.11
BDCM
ND
ND
<0.27
4.10
0
0
ND
0
0
U
0
ND
0
ND
0
0
ND
0
0.39
<0.16
1,2-DCP
ND
ND
<0.12
NAb
0
ND
0
0
0
NA
ND
0.11
ND
0
0
ND
0
0
<0.08
C-1.3-DCP
ND
ND
<1.00
0.65
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0
ND
0
0
ND
0
0
<0.17
1,1,2,2-TCE
ND
ND
<0.22
0
0
0
ND
3.16
0
0
0
ND
0.68
ND
0
0
ND
0
0
<0.18
1,3-DCB
ND
ND
<0.47
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0.40
ND
0.11
0
ND
0
0
<0.62
(continued)
-------
TABLE 49 (continued)
vO
Laboratory
number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Tap water
DCDFM
ND
ND
<0.07
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0
NC
0
8.14
ND
0
0
4.32
MC
ND
ND
<0.09
0.01
0
0
ND
3.43
0
0
0
ND
11.1
5.0
0.81
1.95
ND
1.45
0
<0.05
1,1-DCE
ND
ND
<0.13
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0
ND
0
0
ND
0
0
<0.01
1,2-DCE
ND
ND
<0.14
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
1.23
ND
0
3.13
ND
13.3
0
<0.01
BDCM
ND
5.99
7.65
13.7
21.1
8.60
66.8
10.5
34.8
0
25.1
8.33
12.2
9.06
3.20
16.6
ND
1.43
0
4.89
1,2-DCP
ND
ND
<0
0
NA
0
ND
0
0
0
NA
ND
0
ND
1
1
ND
0
0
<0
.07
.10
.11
.34
.98
.58
.08
C-1.3-DCP
M-
hU
<0
i
3
0
ND
0
7
0
0
ND
12
1
0
3
ND
0
0
0
.13
.64
.29
.24
.6
.•>&
-14
.63
.40
1,1,2,2-TCE
ND
ND
<0.14
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0.57
ND
0.02
11.3
ND
0.47
0
<0.03
1,3-DCB
ND
ND
<1 .17
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
KD
0
ND
0.18
0
ND
1.96
0
<0.18
(continued)
-------
TABLE 49 (continued)
vD
U)
Laboratory
number
1
2
3
4
I
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
DCDFM
ND
ND
<0.06
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0.42
ND
0
0
ND
0
MC
ND
2.
2.
0.
122
0
ND
0
0
0
0.
ND
3.
5.
3.
8.
ND
400
08
97
04
96
50
00
45
58
1,1-DCE
ND
ND
<0.13
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0
ND
0
0
ND
0
1,2-DCE
ND
ND
<0.13
0.19
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0
ND
0.26
0
ND
1.30
Surface
BDCM
ND
ND
<0.16
0.14
0
0
ND
12.0
0
8.34
0
ND
0
ND
0.07
0
ND
0
water
1 , 2-DCP
ND
ND
<0.07
0
NA
0
ND
0
0
0
NA
ND
0
ND
0.02
0
ND
0
c-l,3-DCP
ND
ND
<0.12
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0
ND
0
0
ND
0
1,1,2,2-TCE
ND
ND
<0.13
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0
ND
0.01
0.40
ND
0
1,3
ND
ND
<0
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0
ND
0
0
ND
0
-DCB
.28
.13
(0)*
19
20
0
<0.33
84.
5
<0.19
0
<0.09
0
<0.09
0
<0.14
0
<0.06
0
<0.20
0
<0.14
0
<0
.62
(continued)
-------
TABLE 49 (continued)
Laboratory
number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
13
19
Wastewater 81
DCDFM
ND
ND
<0.27
0
0
0
NO
0
0
0
0
ND
0
J.T)
0
5.71
ND
0
0
MC
ND
ND
<0.37
4.35
0
0
ND
3.01
0.72
0
1.02
ND
1.00
5.10
0.78
1.43
ND
0.68
0
1,1-DCE
ND
ND
<0.54
0.27
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0
ND
0.21
0
ND
0
0
1,2-DCE
ND
54.1
179
153
158
115
121
80.1
157
88.7
196
312
99.5
168
185
93.9
ND
114
(220)*
132
BDCH
ND
3.98
<0.66
0.79
1.05
0
10.5
1.47
7.45
0.12
2.55
4.98
8.39
2.19
2.48
5.56
ND
0
0
1,2-DCP
ND
26.4
152
0
NA
0
ND
0
236
0
NA
ND
5.59
ND
201
0
ND
0
379
c-l,3-DCP
19.0
25.3
5.53
3.14
1.25
0
15.2
0.71
16.5
0
209
ND
6.98
5.99
3.90
5.53
ND
2.18
13.3
1,1,2,2-TCE
ND
52.7
79.2
99.4
b6.4
60.3
68.2
42.3
89.7
53.3
0
886
21.1
96.5
63.9
50.9
ND
45.4
(56.8)
0
1,3-DCB
ND
4.53
<1.10
9.88
18.0
0
11.6
10.6
8.89
0
0
ND
10,0
8.48
7.04
5.33
ND
0
0
20 47.8 <0.30 <0.14 166 3.90 167 13.8 39.7 7.11
(continued)
-------
TABLE 49 (continued)
cn
Laboratory
number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Wastewater «2
DCDF^
ND
ND
<0.18
0
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0.16
ND
0
0
ND
0
0
191
MC
ND
ND
0.76
7.87
0
0
ND
0
1.06
0
0
ND
3.50
3.60
0.76
0.14
ND
1.97
4.07
<0.21
1,1-DCE
1.J8
0.21
<0.36
0.22
0.79
0
ND
0
1.59
0
0
ND
2.63
1.84
0
1.58
ND
1.88
0.96
0.76
1,2-DCE
ND
ND
<0.37
0.03
1.26
0
ND
0
0
0
2.08
ND
0.26
1.72
0.30
1.85
137
1.22
0
<0.09
BDCM
ND
3.27
2.52
2.96
0
0
ND
0
0
0
2.02
5.68
0
2.2-1
1.90
0
ND
11.1
0
<0.12
1,2-DCP
ND
ND
<0.19
0
NA
0
4.35
0
1.22
0
NA
ND
0.20
ND
0
0
137
0
0.29
<0.06
C-1.3-DCP
ND
1.25
2.35
4.31
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0
1.72
2.40
4.62
246
0
0
<0.19
1.1.2,2-TCE
ND
ND
<0.36
0.68
0
0
ND
0
3.75
0
0
29.6
2.34
0.88
0.07
0
ND
0
0
0.20
1.3-DCB
ND
ND
<0.78
0
0
0
ND
3.16
0
0
0
ND
3.30
ND
0
0.75
ND
0
0
<0.57
(continued;
-------
TABLE 49 (continued)
vO
Laboratory
number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
3
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Wastewater «3
DCDFM
NO
ND
<0.14
0
0
0
ND
7.16
12.1
0
0
ND
0
ND
0
1.22
ND
0
0
<0.29
MC
ND
ND
0.98
4.70
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
0.43
2.63
2.90
16.7
4.82
ND
0
25.5
0.30
1,1-DCE
ND
0.44
<0.28
0.39
0.21
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0.66
ND
0.13
0.51
ND
0.10
0
0.63
1,2-DCE
ND
656
708
772
838
108
716
318
884
174
917
1220
690
828
947
151
141
0.5C
460
923
BDCM
ND
3.04
2.41
0.75
1.20
0
12.6
0.32
9.73
0
1.46
5.29
12.3
1.52
3.33
0.85
ND
0
0
12.5
1,2-DCP
ND
9.56
2i.l
28.1
NA
87.0
29.1
12.6
32.5
19.1
NA
ND
30.9
22.1
18.1
19.0
ND
0
12.6
26.6
c-l,3-DCP
9.12
11.7
4.61
5.25
2.18
0
ND
0
3.78
0
30.3
ND
1.56
2.78
4.37
1.81
27.3
0
7.19
8.92
1,1,2,2-TCE
3.65
1.33
<0.30
1.07
6.67
0
ND
4.26
4.56
0
0
ND
1.12
2.80
0.20
1.86
1.60
1.19
0
2.65
1,3-DCB
ND
ND
<0.60
0.14
0
0
ND
0
0
0
0
ND
0.52
ND
0
0
0
0
0
<0.57
*First value for ampuls 1-4; ( ) values for ampuls 5, 6.
-------
APPENDIX D
STATISTICAL SUMMARIES FOR PURGEABLE
HALOCARBONS BY WATER TYPE
197
-------
TABLE 50. STATISTICAL SUMMARY FOR TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE ANALYSES BY WATER TYPE
CD
WATER 1
LOW YOUUEN PAIR
NWRER OF DATA PUINTS
TROE CONC (C) Uli/L
«AN RECOVERY (X)
ACCUSACY(1REL ERROR)
OVERALL STO OEV (S)
OVERALL REL STO OEV. X
SINGLE STO OEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL DEV. I
HEOIUH YOUUEN PAIR
HIW8ER Of DATA POINTS
TKUE CONC (C) UG/L
KEAS RECOVERY (X)
ACCUSACY(1REL ERROR)
OVERALL STO OEV (S)
OVERALL SEi. STO OEV. t
SINGLE STO DEV, (SR)
ANALYST HEL OEV, I
HIGH YOVDEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TKUE CONC (C) UG/L
KEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACOJRACY(%REL EKHOR)
UVEUALL STD OEV (S)
OVERALL REL STD DEV, %
SINGLE STD DEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL OEV, t
1
17
8.00
6.78
-15.31
2.90
42.87
1
23
3
18
40.00
37.01
-7.49
7.83
21.15
4
11
5
18
400.00
355.50
-11.12
113.17
31.83
73
18
2
18
10.00
9.27
-7.32
3.30
35.64
.92
.92
4
18
50.00
43.66
-12.69
7.12
16.32
.74
.75
5
18
499.00
436.22
-12.58
164.49
37.71
.64
.60
WATER 2
1
17
8.00
5.85
-26.92
2.59
44.37
1
20
3
17
40.00
34.75
-13.11
12.17
35.00
10
24
5
18
400.00
342.00
-14.50
111.46
32.59
77
19
Z
18
10. DO
8.2H
-17.17
2.82
34.02
.48
.96
4
18
50.00
47.95
-4.10
10.75
22.41
.21
.68
6
18
499.00
459.00
-8.02
160.59
31.99
.60
.38
WATER 3
1
17
8.00
6.28
-21.55
1.82
28.99
3
18
40.00
36.89
-7.78
6.13
16.62
5
18
400. 00
370.67
-7.33
104.12
28.09
2
17
10.00
8.93
-10.65
2.07
23.21
0.76
9.97
4
18
50.00
47.94
-4.12
9.28
19.37
5.06
11.93
6
18
499.00
483.44
-3.12
16S.M2
35.15
72.39
16.95
WATER 4
1
18
8. (XI
6.66
-16.74
2.59
38.95
1
23
3
18
40.00
36.93
-7.6H
9,19
25.42
9
22
b
19
4UO.UO
358.42
-10. J9
131.65
36.73
67
15
2
1H
10.00
8.94
-10.59
2.63
29.46
.84
.65
4
18
50.00
5C.41
C.82
11.51
22.84
.65
.10
6
18
499.00
487.17
-2.37
190.74
39.15
.62
.99
WATER 5
1
17
8.00
6.1U
-23. /I
2.19
35.83
1
24
3
16
40.00
36.16
-9.61
9.49
26.25
4
ll
5
16
400.00
376.56
-5.ee
107.22
28.47
72
17
2
16
10.00
8.34
-16.61
2.39
28.65
.73
.OU
4
16
50.00
41.63
-16.74
9.84
23.64
.60
.84
6
17
499.00
470.53
-S.71
170.39
16.21
.04
.01
WATER 6
1
17
8.00
6.41
-19.87
2.80
43.68
3
18
40.00
36.33
-9.18
10.15
27.93
s
H
400.00
3/5. 2S
-6.!8
122. U7
32.53
2
16
10.00
7.59
-24.11
2.32
37.15
2.27
32.46
4
18
50.no
50.14
0.28
1 .9)
21 .67
8. 20
18.96
6
18
499.00
4/3.67
-5.08
1/2.08
36.33
70.92
16.71
HATES LEGEND
1 - DISTILLED WATEK
2 - TAP WATER
3 - SOVFAtE WATEK
4 - WASTE WATER 1
b - WASTE WATER 2
6 - WAiFE WATtH 3
-------
TABLE 51. STATISTICAL SUMMARY FOR CHLOROMKTUANE ANALYSES BY WATER TYPE
'O
WATER 1
LOW YOUDEN PAH
NUHBEH Of DATA POINTS
TKUE CONC (C) UG/L
KEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(%REL ERROR)
OVERALL STO DEV (S)
OVEHALL REL STD DEV, I
SINGLE STO OEV. (SR)
ANALYST PEL OEV. I
MEDIUM YOUDEN PAIR
NUM8ER Of DATA POINT:
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(IKEL ERROR)
OVERALL STD OEV
OVERALL REL STU UEV. t
SINGLE STO DEV, (SR)
ANALYST KEL UEV. I
HIGH YOUDEN PAIR
NUMtJEH Of DATA POINTS
TKUE CONC ;c; UG/L
KEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(%KEL ERROR)
OVERALL STD OEV (S)
OVERALL REL STD DEV, *
SINGLE STO DEV. (SR)
ANALYST HEL.UEV, I
I
15
8.00
6.jl
-21. IS
4.79
75.87
1.
22.
3
17
40. OU.
32.12
-19.71
20.02
62.33
11.
32.
5
17
399.00
295.71
-25.89
132.75
44.89
79.
23.
2
16
10.00
7. 84
-21.58
4.77
60.89
59
44
4
18
50.00
38.44
-23.11
26.92
70.02
49
56
6
,7
499.00
386.86
-22.47
170.09
43.97
52
30
WATER 2
1
15
8.00
6.63
-17.18
4.58
69.11
2
30
3
18
40.00
39.89
-0.27
25,09
62.90
15
35
5
17
399.00
327.28
-17.98
137.03
41.87
83
21
2
16
10.00
7.34
-26.63
5.07
69.15
.12
.39
4
18
50. UO
44.95
-10.10
27.94
62.16
.20
.83
6
17
494.00
457.06
-8.41
180.20
39.43
.81
.37
WATER 3
1
15
8.00
5.37
-32.92
3.2;
60.88
2
41
3
17
40.00
38.06
-4.84
26.19
68.81
13
31
5
18
399.00
405.11
1.53
209.31
51.67
84
2D
2
16
10.00
8.51
-14.85
5.15
60.45
.86
.21
4
18
50.00
51.97
3.93
36.59
70.41
.98
.05
6
16
499.00
435. C6
-12.81
154.07
35.41
.25
.06
WATER 4
I
16
8.00
7.27
-9.17
5.27
72.59
3
52
3
18
40.00
39.72
-0.71
31.69
79.78
13
33
5
17
399.00
355.35
-10.94
105.36
29.65
77
18
2
16
10.00
7.47
-25.34
4.12
55.13
.85
.22
4
18
50.00
44.72
-10.57
29.39
65.72
.94
.02
6
IK
499.00
4;-!S.y4
-2.o2
168.S2
34.68
.32
.38
WATER 5
1
16
8.00
6.24
-21.98
5.51
88.32
4.
58.
3
17
40.00
35. 4H
-10.04
25.96
72.13
6.
18.
S
17
399.00
292.41
-26.71
1&9.20
57. H6
59.
16.
2
15
10. UO
7.99
-20.11
1.22
52.82
16
,43
4
19
50.00
39. <2
-21.17
26.72
67.80
81
o;
6
17
409.00
419.24
-15.98
20S.50
4t).;s
25
65
WATER 6
1
12
H.UO
10.30
2H.76
6.81
66.10
7
5?
3
14
40.00
25.11
-37.22
17.05
67.90
10.
31.
"5
is
399.00
301 .33
-24.48
102.^8
34.18
79.
2?.
2
is
10.00
16.73
67.31
17.21
102.85
.72
.11
4
15
5U.OJ
3'.94
-24.13
18.76
49.44
,07
96
5
is
499. :'0
dlH.^7
-1^ .06
114.47
27.33
54
09
WATER LEGEND
1 - DISTILLED WATER
2 - TAP HATER
3 - SURFACE WATER
4 - WASTE WATER 1
5 - WASTE WATtR 2
6 - WASTE WATER 3
-------
TABLE 52. STATISTICAL SUMMARY FOR VINYL CHLORIDE ANALYSES BY WATER TYPE
O
O
WATER 1
LOW YOOOEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TKUE CONC (C) UG/L
HE AN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(1KEL ERROR)
OVERALL STO 0£V (S)
OVERALL REL STO OEV, »
SINGLE STO DEV. (SR)
ANALYST REL OEV. *
HEDIUH YOUUEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
NEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(*REL ERROR)
OVERALL STD OEV (S)
OVERALL REL STD OEV. I
SINGLE STD OEV. (SR)
ANALYST HEL DEV. I
HIGH YQUUEN PAIR
NUMBER Of OATf POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(*REL ERROR)
OVERALL STD DEV (S)
OVEKALi. REL STD DEV. *
SINGLE STO OEV. (SR)
ANALYST KEL UEV, t
HATER LEGCNO
1 - DISTILLEO WATER
2 - TAP WATER
3 - SURFACE WATER
4 - WASTE WAItK 1
5 - WASTE HATER 2
6 - WASTE WATER 3
1
16
8.00
7.33
-ij.38
2. 35
;I2.10
1
20
J
IS
40.00
36. SO
-8.75
6.28
17.21
6
14
5
15
401.00
401.60
0.15
90.08
22.43
61
13
2
16
10. UO
9.70
-2.97
3.26
33.63
.78
.93
4
16
50.00
44.98
-10.04
12.76
28.36
.09
.94
6
16
500.00
513.38
2.67
198.56
38.68
.40
.42
WATER 2
1
16
8.00
6.61
-17.41
2.23
33.75
3
17
40.00
41.32
3.29
11.53
27.91
5
16
401 .00
410.63
2.40
146.20
35.60
2
17
10.00
8.62
-13. H3
2.82
32.77
0.96
12.55
4
17
50.00
50.89
1.78
14.22
27.95
3.62
7.84
6
16
500. UO
531.25
6.25
185.38
34.89
88.12
18.71
WATER 3
1
17
8.UO
7.23
-9.57
2.U
29.52
1
17
3
17
40.00
40.81
2.03
9.31
22.82
8
19
5
17
401.00
4/7.18
19.00
166.11
J4.81
77
14
2
17
10.00
10.23
2.34
3.21
31.39
.55
.70
4
17
50.00
48.86
-2.27
14.53
29.73
.63
.25
6
17
500.00
592.47
18.49
235.91
39.82
.53
.50
WATER 4
1
16
8.00
6.48
-19.02
2.46
38.03
1
25
3
15
40.00
42.09
5.23
6.17
14.66
5
12
5
16
401.00
4b8.38
14.31
118.53
25.86
67
13
2
16
10.00
8.6;
-13.28
3. a
36.97
.90
.14
4
16
50.00
53.59
7.19
9.60
17.91
.77
.07
6
16
500.00
565.13
13.02
174,23
30.83
.87
.26
WATFR 5
1
17
8.00
6.35
-20.68
2.06
32.46
3
17
40.00
36.68
-8.29
10.32
28.13
5
17
401.00
464.29
15.7ct
185.23
39.90
2
17
10. UO
8.71
-12.95
3.73
42.87
2.88
38.22
4
17
50.00
46.14
-7. '2
12.16
26. J5
4.17
10.06
6
17
500, UO
577.35
15,17
2T2.01
47.1!
92.23
17. M
WATER 6
1
16
8.UO
7. Or,
-6.75
2.55
34.13
2.
30,
3
16
40.00
44.42
11.05
7.27
16.38
4
8
5
16
401. 'JO
446. S3
11.44
128. Ob
28.66
63
12
2
17
10.00
11.39
13.87
5.13
45.04
.91
.90
4
16
50.00
5>>.95
1 3.90
5.26
9.24
.19
.27
6
16
5"'). 00
569.75
13.95
16?. 18
2S.47
,64
.52
-------
TABLE 53. STATISTICAL SUMMARY FOR TKAffS-1,2-DICHLOROETHKNE ANALYSES BY WATER TYPE
to
o
WATER 1
LOH YOUUEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY (IREL ERROR)
OVERALL STO UEV (S)
OVERALL REL STO DEV. I
SINGLE STO DEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL UEV, X
MEDIUM JOUUEN PAIH
NUMBER OT DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVER* (X)
ACCURACYfWEL ERROR)
OVERALL STO DEV (S)
OVERALL HEL STO OEV; 1
SINGLE STO OEV. (SR)
ANALYST REL DEV, 1
HIGH YOUOErl PAIH
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UC/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACYflHEL EHROR)
OVERALL STU OEV (S)
OVERALL HEL STO OEV, I
SINGLE STO DEV, (SR)
ANALYST KEL OEV, 1
WATER LEGEND
1 - DISTILLED WATER
2 - TAP WATER
3 - SURFACE WATER
4 - WASTE WATFR 1
5 - HASTE WATLH 2
6 - WA^Tb WATER 3
1
19
8.00
7.3i
-8.64
2.29
31.35
2,
29
3
18
40.00
38.02
-4.96
3.79
9.96
3
7
5
20
400.00
386.80
-3.30
74.49
19.26
70
16
2
?0
10.00
9.86
-1.39
4.28
43.38
.49
.01
4
19
50.00
50.70
1.40
5.43
10.70
.»3
.73
6
i\i
500.00
462.SO
-7.42
133.11
28.76
.29
.55
WATER 2
1
18
8.00
6.74
-15.71
3.03
44.96
1
20
3
18
40.00
39.79
-0.53
11.05
27.77
6
15
5
19
400.00
393. 89
-1.53
83.53
21.21
76
17
2
16
10.00
8.77
-12.31
2.21
25.23
.58
.35
4
18
bJ.OO
48.56
-2.H8
10.49
21.60
.8?
.45
6
H
500.00
463.32
-7.34
140.77
30.38
.08
.75
WATER 3
1
20
8.00
7.13
-10.91
2.56
35.92
1
16
3
19
40. OU
41.11
2.76
7.01
17.07
5
11
5
20
400.00
410.75
2.sy
76. 4i>
18.61
59
12
2
19
10.00
9.54
-4.63
1.68
17.59
.36
.27
4
20
50.00
52.34
4.69
12.83
24.53
.26
.26
6
20
500.00
491.60
-1.68
130.40
26.53
.13
.88
WATER 4
1
l^t
8.UO
6.40
-20.06
2.54
39.74
1.
16.
3
18
40.00
40.70
1.75
10.60
26.04
b.
11.
5
19
400. OU
391.63
-1.34
as. 35
21 63
63.
14.
2
19
10. DO
H.90
-10.99
2.89
32.45
27
J8
4
19
50.00
53.35
6.;i
11.71
21.95
25
15
6
19
WO. 00
4ri2.21
-3.56
135. h?
28.12
/O
53
WATER 5
1
19
8.00
7.42
-7.2«
2.55
34.37
2
23
3
18
40.00
41.39
3.49
6.53
15.78
4
9
5
17
40o.no
39-1.53
-1.37
51.24
12.99
55
12
2
n
10.00
9.96
-0.39
3.29
33.06
.03
.37
t
17
50.00
50.46
0.92
7.24
14.34
.33
.43
6
19
500. DI)
4/6.84
-4.b2
115.38
24.19
.75
.80
WATER 6
1 2
18 17
3.00 10.00
7.23 9.39
-9.67 -6.11
3.21 3.78
44.47 40.31
2.34
28.20
3 4
19 18
40.00 5J.OO
40.44 54.79
1.21 9.59
14.48 12.65
35.77 23.09
7.94
16. 6^
5 6
19 19
400.00 500. (JO
407. H4 47H.J6
1. 'If, -4.35
119.35 135.18
29.26 ^.33
61.01
13.77
-------
TABLE 54. STATISTICAL SUMMARY FOR 1,1,1-TR1CHLOROETHANE ANALYSES BY WATER TYPE
O
HATER 1
LuW YOUOEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY) 1REL ERROR)
OVERALL STD DEV (S)
OVERALL REL STD OEV, 1
SINGLE STD DEV. (SR)
ANALYST REL OEV, t
MCDIUK YOUDEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(IREL ERROR)
OVERALL STD OEV (S)
OVERALL KEL STO UEV. X
SINGLE STO DEV. (SH)
ANALYST REL OEV, i
HIGH tOVUEN PAIR
NUMBER UF DATA POINTS
TKUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY {SKEL ERROR)
OVERALL STO OEV (S)
OVERALL HEL STD OEV. %
SINGLE STD DEV, (SR*
ANALYST REL OEV, t
HATER LEGEND
1 - DISTILLED HATER
2 - TAP HATER
3 - SURFACE HATER
4 - HASTE WATER 1
5 - HASTE WATER 2
6 - HASTE HATER 3
1
16
8.00
7.16
-10.55
1.63
22.79
1
15
3
17
40.00
36.84
-7.90
4.83
13.10
5
12
5
18
399.00
363.83
-8.81
80.17
22.03
64
16
2
16
10.00
8.56
-14.44
2.62
30.66
.22
.59
4
17
50.00
49.80
-0.40
5.16
12.37
.27
.18
6
18
500.00
403.61
-19.28
127.19
31.51
.82
.89
HATER 2
I
18
8.00
7.46
-6.69
1.56
20.95
0.
10.
3
18
40.00
38.59
-3.53
9.84
25,50
2.
6.
5
18
399.00
368.56
-7.63
78.04
21.17
75.
19.
2
16
10.00
8.73
-12.7'
1.31
15.02
88
85
4
17
50.00
50.48
0.95
9.U3
17.89
70
06
6
19
500.00
401.25
-19.75
159.25
39.69
,02
,49
WATER 3
1
18
8.00
7.40
-7.49
1.07
14.39
1
12
3
17
40.00
40.83
2.117
5.83
14.40
5
11
5
17
399.00
377.24
-5.45
78.14
20.71
65
16
2
18
10.00
9,25
-7.49
1.58
17.07
.06
.72
4
17
50.00
47.96
-4.07
8.82
18.38
.03
.33
6
17
500.00
420.35
-15.93
138.20
32.88
.61
.45
WATER 4
1
17
8.00
7.19
-10.13
3.31
46.09
2
36
3
17
40.00
38.05
-4.87
12.85
33.77
7
16
t
J
19
399.00
370.42
-7.16
99.10
26.75
67
17
2
17
10.00
8.12
-16.82
3.83
46.02
.85
.70
4
18
50.00
52.72
5. ',3
14.74
27.97
.68
.92
6
19
500.00
416.63
-16.67
149.31
35.84
.2-3
.09
WATER 5
1
19
8.00
7.68
-4.05
2.54
33.06
2
34
3
17
40.00
38.39
-4.01
8.91
23.21
3
8
5
18
399.00
38?. 78
-4.U7
92.21
24.09
61
15
2
17
IQ.no
9.66
-3.39
3.34
34.56
.95
.00
4
17
50.00
46.15
-7.69
7.11
15.41
.53
.34
6
18
5UO , 00
427.33
-14.53
121.38
28.40
.29
.13
WATER 6
1
15
8.00
6.68
-16.56
1.19
17.78
4.
46.
3
19
40.00
48.52
21.29
18.17
37.46
13
23
S
19
399.00
412.26
3.32
107.13
25.99
79
H
2
1°
10.00
13.59
35.89
7.82
57.53
73
67
4
H
00.00
63.25
26.50
26.08
41.23
.02
.29
6
19
500.00
1S4.37
-•). 13
HO. 45
30.^1
.12
.2h
-------
TABLE 55. STATISTICAL SUMMARY FOR TRICHLOROETHENE ANALYSES BY WATER TYPE
K)
o
OJ
MATER 1
LOW YOUUEN PAIR
NUM8EH OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(IREL ERROR)
OVERALL STO DEV (S)
OVERALL REL STO OEV, I
SINGLE STO DEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL DEV, %
MEDIUM YOUDEN PAIR
NUMSER OF DATA POINTS
THUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(XREL ERROR)
OVERALL STD DEV (S)
OVERALL REL STD DEV, I
SINGLE STD !)£V, (SR)
ANALYST REL DEV, X
HIGH YOUDEN PAIH
NUMBER OF UATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCUHACY(%H£L ERROR)
OVERALL STD DEV (S)
OVERALL KEL STD DEV, 1
SINGLE STO DEV, (SR)
ANALYST KEL OEV, t
WATER LEGEND
1 - DISTILLED WATER
2 - TAP WATER
3 - SURFACE WAfER
4 - WASTE WATt.H 1
5 - WASTE WATFH 2
6 - WASTE WATER 3
1
16
8.00
7.40
-7.52
2.49
33.65
1
13
3
17
80.00
76.24
-4.70
7.18
9.41
7
9
5
18
399.00.
324. 78
-18.60
110.26
33.95
59
16
2
15
10.00
9.05
-9.50
1.92
21.21
.07
.04
4
16
100.00
95.99
-4.01
12.93
13.47
.87
.14
6
17
501.00
386.94
-22.77
142.24
36.76
.58
.74
WATER 2
1
17
8.00
7.12
-11.03
1.66
23.39
1.
15.
3
17
80.00
79.69
-0.38
18.01
22.60
8.
9.
5
18
399.00
358.94
-10.04
124.49
34.68
62.
16.
2
18
10.00
9.24
-7.59
2.63
28.49
29
72
4
18
100.00
98.37
-1.63
22.98
23.36
19
20
6
18
501. 00
408.93
-18.40
182.90
44.74
16
19
WATER 3
1
18
8.00
6.81
-14.83
1.83
26.88
0
8
3
16
80.00
76.74
-4.07
17.35
22.61
10
12
5
16
399.00
351.06
-12. Ul
99.20
28.26
59
14
^
2
18
10.00
8.95
-10.47
2.14
23.96
.67
.55
4
18
100.00
103.43
3.43
37.88
36.62
.90
.09
6
18
501.00
4S9.39
-0.3Z
287.00
57.47
.85
.O/
WATER 4
1
17
8.00
7.94
-0.79
3.40
42.90
3
35
3
17
80.00
74.55
-6.81
21.20
28.43
7
8
5
16
399.00
344.75
-13.60
97.27
28.22
52
13
2
17
10.00
9.21
-7.85
4.19
45.51
.07
.77
4
16
100.00
96.62
-3.38
23.26
24.08
.40
.64
6
15
501.00
431.93
-13.79
136.46
31.59
.13
.42
WATER 5
1
16
8.00
7.57
-5.31
2.71
35.80
0
11
3
16
80.00
79. 4B
-0.65
16.14
20.37
13
16
5
16
399.00
39^.94
-1.52
96.27
24.50
65
15
2
15
10.00
9.49
-5.11
2.36
24.92
.96
.31
4
16
100.00
92.08
-7.92
20.88
22.67
.96
.27
6
16
501.00
453.19
-9.54
149.48
32.98
.97
.59
WATER 6
1
16
8.00
R.22
2.70
2.92
35.57
2
23
3
15
80.00
76.71
-4.12
19.34
25.21
13
IS
5
16
399.00
362. ftl
-9.07
105.16
28.99
59
15
2
15
10.00
10.12
1.25
3.12
30.81
.18
.77
4
15
100.00
104.14
4.14
21.09
23.13
.75
.21
6
15
501.00
416.00
-16.97
146.21
35.15
.50
.28
-------
TABLE 56. STATISTICAL SUMMARY FOR DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ANALYSES BY WATER TYPE
WATER 1
LOW YOUOEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(%REL ERROR)
OVERALL STO DEV (S)
OVERALL REL STD DEV, %
SINGLE STO DEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL UEV, %
MEDIUM YOUDEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(1REL ERROR)
OVERALL STO DEV (S)
OVERALL REL STD DEV, *
SINGLE STD DEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL DEV, %
HIGH YOUDEN PAIR
NUMUER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCUHACY(%K£L ERROR)
OVERALL STD OEV (S)
OVERALL KEL STO OEV, 4
SINGLE STO OEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL UEV, I
WATER LEGEND
1 - DISTILLED WATER
2 - TAP WATER
3 - SURFACE WATER
4 - WASTE WATER 1
5 - WASTE WATER 2
b - WASTE WATER 3
1
16
8.00
12.49
56.16
6.51
52.10
2
21
3
17
80.00
79.05
-1.19
13.96
17.66
8
9
5
17
400.00
373.47
-6.63
100.41
26.89
58
13
2
15
10.00
8.52
-14.81
2.97
34.85
.28
.67
4
17
102.00
105.81
3.73
16.67
15.76
.40
.09
6
17
488.00
464.61
-4.79
154.73
33.30
.53
.97
WATER 2
1
15
8.00
12.57
57.12
4.50
35.81
2
16
10.00
9.67
-3.25
2.79
28.87
2.63
23
3
1,6
80.00
81. iO
1.37
17.97
22.16
8
9
5
16
400.00
406.56
1.64
68.63
16.88
49
11
.67
4
17
102.00
110.90
8.73
25.43
22.93
.99
.36
6
17
488.00
456.65
-6.42
144.77
31.70
.73
.52
WATER 3
1
16
8.00
10.53
31.62
5.60
53.17
2
24
3
ie
80.00
78.12
-2.35
13.68
17.51
12
13
5
16
400.00
373.06
-6.73
87.81
23.54
45
11
2
15
10.00
7.96
-20.35
2.55
32.06
.29
.80
4
16
102.00
100.99
-0.99
25.99
25.73
.37
.82
6
16
488.00
438.66
-10.11
135.36
30.86
.37
.18
WATER 4
1
16
8.00
11.50
43.80
5.93
51.54
4,
41
3
16
80.00
75.29
-5.88
14.96
19.87
8
9
5
14
400.00
370.86
-7.29
46.36
12.50
23
5
2
16
10.00
8.99
-10.13
4.60
51.24
.22
.22
4
15
1°2.00
101.65
-0.34
20.84
20.50
.03
.08
6
14
488. UO
461.00
-5.53
66.40
14.40
.24
.59
WATER 5
1
17
8.00
13.23
65.42
6.33
47.85
4
37
3
17
80.00
82.30
2.87
19.30
23.45
8
9
5
17
400.00
378.53
-5.37
102.77
27.15
58
13
2
16
10.00
8.95
-10.54
4.50
50.31
.11
.06
4
17
102.00
103. C4
1.02
24.19
23.47
.62
.30
6
17
488.00
475.59
-2.54
143.94
30.27
.73
.75
WATER 6
1
U
8.00
1?.96
62.05
4.47
34.51
2
16
3
16
80.00
80.24
0.30
24.65
30.72
13
13
5
17
400.00
389.18
-2.71
124.82
32.07
53
12
2
16
10.00
11.65
16.54
4.76
40.81
.06
.70
4
16
102.00
111.35
9.17
27.89
25.05
.17
.75
6
16
488.00
466.19
-4.47
129.37
27.75
.54
.52
-------
TABLE 57. STATISTICAL SUMMARY FOR 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER ANALYSES BY WATER TYPE
O
cn
WATER 1
LOW YOUDEN PAIH
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TKDE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACYftKEL ERROR)
OVERALL STU UEV (S)
OVERALL REL STD UEV, I
SINGLE STD DEV. (SR)
ANALYST REL DEV, S
MEDIUM YOUDEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(XREL ERROR)
OVERALL STO OEV (S)
OVERALL HEL STD DEV. J
SINGLE STD DEV, (SR)
ANALYST rtEL DEV, %
HIGH "OUOEN PAIH
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) Uli/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCU«ACY(*m EKROR)
OVERALL STD DEV (S)
OVERALL HEL STO DEV, 1
SINGLE STD OEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL DEV, I
WATER LEGEND
1 - DISTILLED WATEK
2 - TAP WATEK
3 - SURFACE WATtH
4 - WASTE WATER 1
b - WASTE WATER 2
6 - WASTE WATER 3
1
15
8.00
7.14
-10.69
2.98
41.71
2.
30.
3
15
80.00
69.48
-13.15
23.40
33.67
17,
21,
5
0
398.00
UND
UNO
UNO
UND
2
17
10.00
11.80
18.01
7.20
61.04
87
34
4
13
100.00
96.98
-3.02
20.24
20.87
,93
.54
6
U
501.00
UND
UNO
UNO
UNO
U.OO
U
.00
WATER ?
1
14
8.00
6.83
-14.65
3.10
45.39
1,
24,
3
15
80.00
59.32
-25.86
26.59
44.83
24
36
5
0
398. U'J
UND
UND
UND
UND
0
0
2
15
10.00
8.03
-19.72
3.82
47.58
.82
.46
4
15
100.00
71.97
-28.03
33.73
46.86
.16
.BO
6
0
501. UO
UNU
UND
UND
UND
.00
.00
WATER 3
1 2
15 18
8.00 10.00
6.85 7.30
-14.33 -26.95
2.36 3.16
34.41 43.24
1.57
22.18
3 4
16 15
80.00 100.00
b!!.64 87.89
-14.20 -12.11
29.98 37.00
43.68 42.10
35.22
4S.OO
b 6
0 0
398. OU 501.00
UND UND
UND UNO
UND UND
UND UNO
0.00
0.00
WATER 4
1
15
8.0U
7.98
-0.28
3.01
37.69
1.
19.
3
16
80.00
79.74
-0.33
28.66
35.95
21.
23.
5
0
398. UU
UND
UNO
UND
UNO
0.
0.
2
18
10.00
9.77
-2.31
4.59
46.95
71
22
4
15
100.00
102.16
2.16
46.77
45.78
18
28
6
3
SO \. 00
160.67
-67.93
99.06
61.65
00
i)0
WATER 5
1
16
8.00
7.28
-8.96
2.55
34.98
2
28
3
15
80.00
67.68
-15.40
24.57
36.30
21
27
5
0
398.00
UNO
UND
UNO
UNO
0
0
2
15
10.00
7.24
-27.61
2.82
38.99
.09
.79
4
13
100. UO
85.18
-14.82
27.34
32.10
.32
.89
6
0
501.00
UNJ
UNU
UND
UNO
.00
.00
WATER 6
1
14
8.00
7.21
-9.92
2.24
31.12
2
39
3
15
80.00
63,47
-14.42
jl.61
46.17
28
35
5
0
398. UO
UNO
UNO
UtJ
UNU
U
0
2
17
10.00
8.07
-19.28
4.26
52.81
.99
.U9
4
14
100.00
91.46
-8.54
49.13
53.71
.67
.H6
6
0
501.00
USU
UNO
UNI)
UNO
.00
.OU
-------
TABLE 58. STATISTICAL SUMMARY FOR TETRACHLOROETHENE ANALYSES BY WATER TYPE
O
CM
WATER 1
LOW YOUUEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY (XKEL ERKOK)
OVERALL STO UEV (S)
OVERALL HEL STD UEV, t
SINGLE STO DEV, (SK)
ANALYST HEL OEV, X
MEDIUM YOUDEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
THUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY (IKEl EHKOR)
OVERALL STO UEV (S)
OVERALL REL STU OEV. I
SINGLE STO DEV, (SR)
ANALYST HEL DEV, %
HIGH YOUUEN PAIR
NUMBER OF UATA POINTS
THUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCU«ACY(IREL ERROR)
OVERALL STD DEV (b)
OVERALL KEL STO OEV, X
SINGLE STD OEV, (SR)
ANALYST KEL UEV, X
MATER LEGENO
1 - DISTILLED HATER
2 . TAP HATER
3 - SURFACE WATEH
4 - HASTE HAUH 1
5 - HASTE HATER 2
1
18
8.00
1.11
-2.66
3.88
49.93
1
18
3
19
BO. 00
77.61
-2.99
5.63
7.26
7
8
5
20
399. UU
366.65
-8.11
95.29
25.99
79
19
. 2
18
10.00
9.02
-9,S1
3.73
41.33
.59
.9U
4
19
100.00
100.45
0.45
12.11
12.05
.30
.20
6
20
500.00
437.25
-12.55
144.97
33.15
.25
.72
HAFER 2
1
16
8.00
7.48
-6.52
2.05
27.41
2,
28,
3
18
80.00
82.38
2.98
14.47
17.57
6
7
5
19
399.00
363.95
-8.79
93.39
25.66
111
28
2
18
10.00
10.65
6.53
4.15
38.99
.67
.88
4
19
100.00
103.42
3.42
15.86
15.33
.80
.32
6
19
500.00
432.32
-13.54
163.58
37.84
.52
.01
HATER 3
1
18
8.00
6.75
-15.60
1.94
28.68
1,
22,
3
19
80.00
79.16
-1.05
'.t.58
12.10
6
7
5
20
399.00
384.75
-3.57
110.32
28.67
82
19
2
19
10.00
9.49
-5.06
3.08
32.40
.83
.52
4
19
100.00
99.12
-U.H8
13. U8
13.20
.62
.42
6
20
500.00
453.45
-9.31
152.51
33.63
.63
.72
HATER 4
1
10
8.00
7.54
-5.69
5.48
72.59
4
57
3
16
80.00
71.33
-10.84
24. H9
34.90
7
10
5
17
399.00
356.71
-10.60
125.82
35. 2l
138
36
2
10
10.00
7.35
-26.51
4.53
61.64
.26
.24
4
17
100.00
82.66
-17.3*
25.96
31.40
.93
.29
b
17
500.00
405.18
-18.96
187.36
46.24
.99
.49
HATEM 5
1
18
8.00
7.78
-2.81
3.02
38.84
1.
20.
3
18
80.00
8?. 11
2.63
12.01
14.63
10.
\2.
5
19
399.00
3/1.00
-7.02
116.03
31.28
96.
23.
2
1H
10.00
9.00
-9.98
2.47
27.J9
;4
69
4
19
100.00
97.99
-2.01
26.53
27.07
R8
OH
6
19
500.00
45J.89
-9.22
15D. 28
33.11
39
.37
HATER 6
1
17
H.OO
9.12
14. U2
3.64
39.95
2
23
3
18
80.00
84. HI
6.01
23.11
27.25
8
9
5
17
399.00
376.94
-5.53
100.27
26.60
f.9
17
2
17
10.00
10.44
4.39
3.64
34.87
.31
.67
4
17
100.00
104. ft 7
4.b7
20.17
19. tl
.71
.20
6
\l
500.00
47S.94
-14.81
136.99
32.16
.33
.21
6 - HASTE HATER 3
-------
TABLE 59. STATISTICAL SUMMARY FOR 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE ANALYSES BY WATER TYPE
WATER 1
LOU YOUDEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (r.)
ACCURACY (XREL ERROR)
OVERALL STD DEV (S)
OVERALL REL STO UEV, 1
SINGLE STO DEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL OEV, I
MEOIUM YUUDEN PAIR
NUMBER Of DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY (IREL ERROR)
OVERALL STD DEV (S)
OVERALL REL STO DEV, %
SINGLE STD OEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL UEV, t
HIGH YOUOEN PAIR
NUMBER OF OATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN KECUVERY (X)
ACCURACY (WEL ERROR)
OVERALL STU OEV (S)
OVERALL REL STO UEV, I
SINGLE STO OEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL OEV, t
1
15
8.00
9.49
18.57
7.52
7V. 30
2
15
10.00
10.4;
4.65
7.30
69.77
1.97
19.
3
15
80.00
74.17
-7.28
10.41
14.03
9
11
5
16
399.00
374.56
-6.12
75.16
20,07
51
12
,79
4
14
100.00
94.85
-5.15
14.61
15.41
.63
.40
6
16
501.00
459.81
-8.22
114.60
24.92
.21
.28
WATER 2
1
15
8.00
9.29
16.13
5.87
63.13
3.
34.
3
16
80.00
72.14
-9.82
14.79
20.49
12.
14.
5
17
399.00
367.88
-7.80
74.48
20.25
50,
12.
2
14
10.00
8.88
-11.21
1.97
22.17
09
02
4
16
100.00
98.84
-1.16
17.29
17.50
00
04
6
16
501.00
451.50
-9.88
72.75
16.11
74
38
WATER 3
1
14
8.00
6.61
-17.35
1.75
26.53
3
15
80.00
74.47
-6.92
13.10
17.59
5
16
399.00
352.25
-11.72
67.39
19.13
2
13
10.00
9.21
-7.88
I.B4
19.93
0.84
10.67
4
16
100.00
91.46
-8.54
21.08
23.05
8.35
10.06
6
16
501.00
416.88
-16.79
102. H2
24.f,6
45.40
11.81
WAKW 4
1
14
8.00
6.21
-22.38
4.36
70.14
1
22
3
14
80.00
73.00
-8.75
9.97
13.66
9
11
5
16
399.00
3J7.Sh
-15.40
72.14
21.37
63
16
2
13
10.00
9.44
-5.t5
5.43
57.58
.75
.42
4
15
100.00
88.85
-11.15
19.76
22.24
.49
.72
6
16
501.00
436.06
-12.96
111.81
25.64
.65
,46
WATER 5
1
14
8.UO
7.12
-10.98
2.78
39.07
1
21
3
16
80.00
71.84
-10.20
11.69
16.28
4
12
5
17
399.00
363.06
-9.01
64.71
17.82
>H
13
2
13
10.00
fl.07
-19.27
2.51
31.14
.62
.36
4
16
100.00
86.06
-13.94
15.48
17.98
.88
.52
6
17
501.00
474. SS
-5. <"&
11H.65
25.00
.25
.91
MATER 6
i
13
8.00
7.09
-11.32
2.50
35.25
1.
19.
3
15
80.00
70.41
-11.98
15.69
22.29
11.
1 3.
b
15
34H.67
-12.61
66,09
18.95
32.
?'
2
12
10.00
7.45
-25.52
3.58
48.03
44
80
4
15
100.00
93. RS
-N.12
17.68
H.R4
o;
«y
6
15
50 1.00
4f,5.33
-7.12
t, 1 . 1 5
!3.14
Ob
HH
WATER LEGEND
1 - DISTILLED WATER
2 - TAP WATER
3 - SURhACE WATER
4 - WASTE WAftH 1
5 - WASTE WATER 2
6 - WASTE WATER 3
-------
TABLE 60. STATISTICAL SUMMARY FOR BROMOMETHANE ANALYSES BY WATER TYPE
O
CD
WATER 1
LOW YOUOEN PA IK
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TKUE CONC (C) UG/L
WAN KECOVEHY (X)
ACCURACY(1KEL ERROR)
OVEKALL STD OEV (S)
OVERALL REL SIU OEV, %
SINGLE STO OEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL OEY, I
MEDIUM YOUOEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY (%REL ERROR)
OVEKALL STD DEV (S)
OVERALL REL STD DEV, I
SINGLE STO DEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL UEV, %
HIGH YUUDEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC 'C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCUKACY(tHF.L ERROR)
OVEKALL STO DEV (S)
OVERALL REL STO DEV, t
SINGLE STO DEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL OEV. »
1
17
8.00
5.00
-37. b6
2.77
55.42
1
30
3
15
80.00
24.98
-68.77
6.51
26.08
17
45
5
18
398.00
443.44
11.42
142.93
32.23
68
14
?
17
10.00
b.73
-32.69
3.2b
48.32
.80
.69
4
18
100.00
51.69
-48.31
37.44
72.43
.47
.58
6
15
499.00
505.40
1.28
100.41
19..87
.29
.39
WATER 2
1
16
B.UO
4.7?
-41.04
2.08
44.16
1
26
3
18
80.00
44.19
-44.76
34.06
77.08
11
?1
5
18
398.00
524.67
31.83
259.97
49.55
162
25
2
16
10.00
7.16
-28.39
4.02
56.19
.55
.17
4
18
100.00
63.83
-36. 17
45.45
71.19
.83
.91
6
18
499.00
727.17
45.72
437.14
60.11
.47
.96
HATER 3
1
17
8.00
6.06
-24.21
4.12
67.89
2.
43.
3
16
80.00
29.44
-63.20
10.12
34.38
n.
.28.
5
18
398.00
514.56
29.29
264.68
51.44
123.
20.
2
17
10.00
6.63
-33.73
4.33
65.35
79
94
4
18
100.00
52.39
-47.61
28.26
53.94
69
57
6
18
499.00
674.11
35.09
305.07
45.26
67
81
HATEK 4
1
17
8.00
&.30
-21.19
3.73
59.18
2
33
3
15
80.00
L8.78
-64.03
13.68
47.54
4
13
5
1-1
398.00
421.07
5. HO
109.10
25.91
65
12
2
17
10.00
8.70
-12.99
5.96
68.55
.49
.15
4
15
100.00
3H.41
-61.59
17.71
46.11
.60
.70
6
Ib
499.00
632.88
26.83
305.68
48.30
.58
.44
WATEK b
1
14
8.00
5.33
-33.42
2.55
47.82
3
52
3
14
80.00
29.54
-63.07
11.02
37.31
e
22
b
13
39R.OO
422.08
6.05
92.39
21.89
63
11
2
15
10.00
7.71
-22.91
4.45
57.67
.40
.18
4
14
100.00
42.96
-57.04
17.50
40.74
.21
.65
6
IS
4S9.00
663.00
32.87
398.85
60.16
.60
.72
WATEM 6
1
13
8.00
6.11
-23. b3
3.14
51.36
1
21
3
15
80.00
2'. 74
-65.3?
14.01
50.50
5
15
b
13
398.00
3/8. 69
-4.85
47.49
12.54
51
11
2
14
10.00
7 H3
-21.66
4.61
58.90
.46
.01
4
15
100.00
3H.27
-61.71
16.55
43.23
.13
.55
6
14
14^). 00
517.21
3.65
H4.16
16.2?
.0?
.31
WATER LEGCNO
1 - OISTILLEO WATER
2 - TAP WATER
3 - SURFACE HATEK
4 - WASTE WATtK 1
5 - WASTE WATEK 2
6 - WASTE WATEK 3
-------
TABLE 61. STATISTICAL SUMMARY FOR CHLOROETHANE ANALYSES BY WATER TYPE
WATER 1
LOW YOUOEN PAIR
NUMBER Of DATA POINTS
TKUE CONC (C) IHi/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(tKEL ERROH)
OVEKALL STD DEV (S)
OVEKALL KEL STU DEV. 1
SINGLE STD OEV. (SR)
ANALYST KEL DEV. I
MEDIUM YOUUCN PAIK
NUMBER Of DATA POINTS
TKUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(iKEL ERROR)
OVEKALL STO DEV (S)
OVERALL REL STD DEV. S
SINGLE STD DEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL DEV, t
HIGH YOUOEN PAIR
NUMBER Of DATA POINTS
TKUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY (IKEL EKKOR)
UVEHALL STD DEV (S)
OVEKALL REL STD DEV, I
SINGLE STO OEV. (SR)
ANALYST KEL DEV, %
WATER LEGEND
1 - DISTILLED WATER
2 - TAP WAFER
3 - SUKFACE WATEK
4 - WASH WAILK 1
5 - WASTE WATtH 2
6 - WASTE WARM 3
1
16
». 00
t>.42
-19.71
2.00
31.07
0.
M.
3
14
40.00
33.01
-17.46
7.C9
23.30
6
IS
5
16
399.00
43b.94
9.26
67.44
IS. 47
S3
11
2
15
10.00
8.76
-12.42
1.56
17.81
.86
.33
4
14
SO. 00
4S.35
-9.30
H. 82
19.45
.24
.93
6
1
498. ..0
bll.25
2.66
87.42
17.10
.44
.2i)
WAFER 2
1
15
8.00
6.45
-19.32
1.55
23.99
1
14
3
13
40.00
36.74
-8.15
9.34
25.42
3
7
5
15
399.00
466.53
16.93
82.94
17.78
36
7
2
14
10.00
9.44
-5.64
2.17
22.95
.19
.99
4
14
50.00
49.91
-0.19
10.07
20.18
.28
.57
6
15
498.00
541.73
8.78
82.27
15.19
.65
.27
WATER 3
1
17
8.00
7.29
-8.92
3.63
49.76
1.
18.
3
17
40.00
37. 4/
-6.32
11. b6
31.12
14.
JO.
5
18
399.00
455.78
14.23
90.79
19.92
43.
8.
2
16
10.00
9.60
-3.95
3.06
31.83
56
49
4
18
50.00
56.92
13.84
21.60
37.94
38
47
6
17
498.00
555.47
11.54
73.51
13.23
64
63
WATEK 4
1
15
8. CO
8.47
5.90
6.42
75.75
1.
12.
3
14
40.00
J6.03
-9.93
7.52
20.87
3.
7.
5
14
399. UO
45S.21
14.09
50.68
11.13
44.
9.
2
15
10. CO
il.59
15.89
7.?9
62.91
28
77
4
14
50.00
46.73
-6.54
10.81
23.13
25
85
6
1*
4Q8.00
525.00
5.42
58.21
11.09
45
07
WATEK 5
1
16
H.IIO
6.32
-21.04
2.21
35.02
1.
22.
3
16
40. UO
38.94
-2.M
14. U4
36.04
4.
!0.
5
15
399.00
466.60
16.44
5;. S3
12.42
30.
6.
2
15
10.00
8.32
-16.77
2.52
30.29
64
43
4
16
50.00
53.30
6.60
18.93
35.57
69
17
6
15
448.00
521.73
4.77
69.26
13.28
20
11
WATEK 6
1
17
8.00
7.45
-6.89
2.20
29.43
1
21
3
17
40.00
37.85
-5.38
13.72
36.24
4
11
5
17
399.00
477.06
19.56
140.3U
29.41
54
10
2
15
10.00
9.40
-6.03
3.35
35.65
.85
.95
4
17
50.00
48.32
-3.55
18.77
38.92
.HH
.33
6
17
498.00
566.00
13.65
42. 06
16.26
.55
.46
-------
TABLE 62. STATISTICAL SUMMARY FOR 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ANALYSES BY WATER TYPFi
WATER 1
LOW YOODEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(XREL ERROR)
OVERALL STO DEV (S)
OVERALL KEL STO OEV. 1
SINGLE STO OCV, (SR)
ANALYST REL OEV. I
HE01UM YOUOEN PAIR
NUMBER OF OATA POINTS
THUE CONC (C) UG/L
ft AH RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY (IKEL ERI-9H)
OVERALL STO OEV (S)
OVERALL REL STO OEV. X
SINGLE STO OEV. (SR)
ANALYST HEL DEV, X
HIGH YOUDEN PAIR
NUMBER Of- OATA POINTS
TKUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCUKACY(XHEL ERROR)
OVERALL STO OEV (S)
OVERALL REL STD DEV, X
SINGLE STD DEV. (SR)
ANALYST REL DEV, X
WATER LEGEND
1 - OI5TILLED WATER
2 - TAP HATER
3 - SURFACE WATER
4 - WASTE WATEK 1
5 - VASTE UATEK 2
0 - UAbTE WATER 3
1
19
8.00
6.47
-19.13
1.82
26.17
1
17
3
17
40.00
37.78
-5.54
6.40
16.94
11
24
5
19
400.00
422.79
5.70
139.77
33.06
71
18
2
19
10.00
9.35
-6.51
1.84
19.64
.40
.76
4
19
50.00
57.44
14.88
19.64
34.19
.63
.43
6
19
499.00
367.84
-26.28
116.84
31. /6
.;e
.00
WATER 2
1
18
8.00
6.50
-18.75
1.52
23.45
3
18
40.00
43.48
8.71
13.83
31.81
5
IB
400.00
453.28
13.32
154.01
33.98
2
IB
10.00
9.60
-3.99
1.80
18.75
1.08
13.48
4
18
50. 1)0
67.17
14.34
19.80
34.63
5.81
11.53
6
17
499.00
363.35
-27.18
89.28
24. b7
50.39
12.34
WATER 3
1
18
8.00
7.28
-9.00
3.41
46 77
2.
25.
3
I/
40.00
39.61
-0.97
6.35
16.04
6.
14.
b
18
400.00
445.50
11.37
135.08
30.32
36.
8.
2
17
10.00
10.58
5.79
2.38
22.53
30
74
4
17
50.00
53.39
6.78
9.43
17.67
59
17
6
18
499.00
371.06
-25.64
98.67
26.59
01
82
WATER 4
1
17
8.00
6.93
-13.34
2.26
32.65
0
9
3
16
40.00
39.37
-1.58
10.53
26.75
4
10
5
16
400.00
406.14
1.54
156.20
38.46
87
23
2
I/
10.00
9.58
-4.24
2.91
30.43
.81
.83
4
16
50.00
52.83
5.66
15.27
28.91
.93
.69
6
16
499.00
341.19
-31.83
109.27
32.03
.91
.53
WATER 5
1
17
8.00
6.07
-24.18
2.15
35.43
3
17
40.00
45.95
14.87
14.63
31.85
5
17
4UO.OO
445.18
11.29
144. KO
32.53
2
17
10.00
9.03
-9.70
3.49
38.61
2.37
31.39
4
16
50.00
56.86
13. /I
16.66
29.30
3.21
6.24
6
17
499.00
362.53
-23.34
125. HI
3Z.89
44.51
10.76
WATER 6
1
14
n.uo
7.12
-11.03
2.22
31.13
3
13
40.00
43.12
7.81
7.68
17.82
5
13
400.00
4S7.77
M . 4 4
76.95
16.31
2
14
10.00
9.50
-5.02
2.44
Z5.73
0.55
6.57
4
14
50.00
53.34
6.47
15.95
29.96
7.05
14.63
6
13
4 19 . 00
341. 3d
-21.57
eo.a?
?0.65
50. S/
12.00
-------
TABLE 63. STATISTICAL SUMMARY FOR CHLOROFORM ANALYSES BY WATER TYPE
WATER 1
LOW YOUUEN PA IK
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) Uli/L
MEAN RECUVEKY (K)
ACCURACY(WEL ERROR)
OVEHALL STO OEV (S)
OVERALL HEL STO OEV. X
SINGLE STO OEV. (SK)
AHALYST REL OEV. I
MEOIUM YOODEN PAIR
hUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCORACY(XHEL ERROR)
OVERALL STO OEV (S)
OVERALL REL STD OEV. t
SINGLE STD DEV. (SR)
ANALYST HEL OEV, 1
HIGH YOUOEN PAIK
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) OG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (I)
ACCURACY {TWEL ERROR)
OVEHALL STU OEV (S)
OVERALL REL STt DEV. t
SINGLE STO DEV. (SH)
ANALYST REL UEV. i
WATER LEGEND
1 - D1STIILEO WATER
2 - TAP WAftH
3 - SURFACE WAT^M
4 - HASTE WAT[H 1
5 - UASTE WATER Z
6 - HAiTE WATEK 3
1
20
8.00
6.83
-14.61
1.33
19. S3
3
19
40. on
39.65
-0.87
2.12
9.89
5
20
400.00
35H.3Q
-10.43
73.91
20.63
2
20
10.00
8.97
-10.33
1.72
19.14
1.20
IS. 19
4
20
50.00
48.18
-3.64
8.79
18.24
b.28
12.03
6
20
501.00
431.30
-13.91
1U7.09
24.83
56.16
14.23
WATE
1
17
8.0U
11.47
43.32
9.28
60.91
6.
55.
3
18
40.00
40.33
0.82
10. Z7
25.45
6.
14.
5
16
400.00
372.64
-6.83
40. 48
10.86
36.
8.
H 2
2
16
10.00
11. OU
10.82
5.43
48.98
25
45
4
16
50. UO
48.17
-3.66
5.51
11.44
63
98
6
17
501. OU
449.18
-10.34
71.03
15. HI
ZH
83
WATEH 3
1
18
8.00
7.10
-11 25
1.67
23.51
2
27
3
20
40.00
38.48
-3.80
3.46
8.99
7
17
b
19
4oo.no
353. 58
-11.61
74.97
21.20
42
10
2
19
10.00
10.80
7.97
3.72
34.45
.50
.90
4
20
50.00
51.00
2.01
11.42
22.40
.71
.23
b
20
501.00
462.80
-7.62
123. U9
2o.60
.06
.JO
WATER 4
1
17
8.00
7.87
-1.63
2.42
30.76
1.
18.
3
19
40.00
38.76
-3.11
7.07
18.25
7.
16.
5
19
400.00
367.89
-8.03
46. 1H
12.61
14.
1 1.
2
19
10.00
8.98
-10.23
2.79
31.03
54
25
4
?0
50.00
44.90
-10.19
9.01
20.07
01
77
6
20
501.00
421.45
-15.88
100.45
25. 73
26
21
WATER 5
1
20
8.00
6.72
-15.94
1.52
22.68
1.
20.
3
20
40.00
40.14
0.35
6.55
16.33
3.
8.
5
20
40'J.OO
3>>3.0S
-9.24
64.45
17.75
52.
12.
2
19
!0.00
9.1?
-8.27
1.33
14.47
59
04
4
19
50.00
47.29
-5.42
6.J3
13.39
86
84
6
20
501.00
454.65
-9.25
103.24
22.71
58
H6
WATEH 6
1
12
8.00
7.59
-5.09
2.48
32.68
3
41
3
17
40.00
40.44
1.09
10.69
26.44
i
1 J
5
16
400.00
3M2.56
-5.36
b2.30
13. b?
37
8
?
13
10.00
10.21
2.13
6.47
63.31
.65
.03
4
17
50.00
4-J.02
-1.96
12. li
26.90
.te
.2)
6
16
501.00
4bS.m
-6.41
8?. 32
17.56
.82
.Hrf
-------
TABLE 64. STATISTICAL SUMMARY FOR CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ANALYSES BY WATER TYPE
NJ
M
N>
WATER I
LOW YOUOEN PAIH
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
*AN KECOVEKY (I)
ACCURACY (tHEL ERROR)
OVERALL STO OEV (s)
OVERALL KEL STO OEV, I
SINGLE STO UEV, (SR)
ANALYST KEL OEV. I
MEOIUM YOUUEN PAIR
NUMBER OF UATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY (MEL ERROR)
OVERALL STO 0£V {$)
OVERALL REL STO OEV, »
SINGLE STC OEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL DF.V, I
HIGH YOUOEN PAIR
NUHBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(tHEL ERROR)
OVERALL STU OEV (Sj
OVERALL REL STO DEV. 1
SINGLE STl) OEV, (SH)
ANALYST REL OEV. I
WATER LEGEND
1 - DISTILLED WATER
2 - TAP WATER
3 - SURFACE WATER
4 - WASTE WATEK 1
b - WASTE WATER 2
b - WASTE WATEK J
1
19
8.00
6.62
-17.28
i.s;
28.31
3
19
40.00
39.37
-1.58
7.49
19.02
5
19
399.00
392.58
-1.61
69.16
17.62
2
19
10.00
8.99
-10.11
1.81
2U.13
1.52
19.53
4
19
50.00
48.43
-3.15
10.75
22.20
7.35
16.75
6
19
501.00
470.95
-6.00
106.76
2?. 67
60.94
14.11
WATER 2
1
la
8.00
6.19
-22.56
2.05
33.06
2.
33.
3
18
40.00
37.42
-6.44
8.84
23.63
5.
13.
b
19
399.00
394.16
-1.21
68.93
17.49
42.
9.
2
19
10. 00
7.04
-29. bb
2.89
41. Oi
20
25
4
19
50.00
50.36
1.93
14.26
27.99
95
47
C
19
bGl.JO
482.79
-3.63
89. Oh
18.45
20
62
WATER 3
1
14
8.00
7.21)
-10. Ob
1.11
15.47
3
16
40.00
37.36
-6.59
4.67
12.49
5
18
399.00
376.39
-S.67
61.15
17.04
2
17
10.00
9.10
-9.01
1.51
16.55
0.80
9.79
4
1H
50.00
49.16
-1.68
13.94
28.36
7.51
1?.3S
6
18
501.00
465.67
-7.1)5
90.65
19.4.;
39.19
9.31
HATER 4
1
16
8.00
5.72
-28.45
2.56
44.73
1
24
3
17
40.00
34.79
-13.03
9.91
28.48
4
10
5
18
349.00
3/5.67
-5.8b
82. bG
21.98
-57
n
2
\f>
10.00
6.53
-34.74
2,40
36.79
.52
.81
4
17
50. nu
44.51
-10.98
12.44
27.95
.08
.30
6
18
501.00
445.50
-11. 08
98.01
22.00
.b?
.60
WATER 5
1
17
8.00
6.97
-12.83
1.52
21.85
2
26
3
19
40.00
36.3/
-9.07
8,82
24.25
4
11
5
19
399.00
392.37
-1.66
;s./'a
19.31
41
9
?
17
10.00
8.46
-15.42
2.74
32.44
.01
.01
4
19
50.00
4b.ll
-9.78
13.03
28. B8
.54
.15
6
18
501.00
478.6;
-4.46
71.89
IS. 02
.61
.bt>
WATEK 6
1
16
8.00
6.53
-18.43
3.80
58.26
1
23
3
19
40.00
40.86
2.15
18.17
44.46
e
14
5
18
399.00
412. HO
3.2b
50. OH
12.15
35
7
2
17
10.00
8.66
-13.39
5.19
59.87
.80
.69
4
19
SO. 00
4^ ,;<>
-7.53
14.73
31. Kb
.4ft
.87
6
18
501.00
t.n.3 >
2.47
7 7 . j ]
1 5 . 00
.4?
.05
-------
TABLE 65. STATISTICAL SUMMARY FOR TKANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ANALYSES BY WATER TYPE
U)
WATER I
LOW YOUDEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCUKACY(IKEL ERROR)
OVERALL STD OEV (S)
OVERALL REL STD DEV, I
SINGLE STU DEV, (SR)
ANALYST RF.L DEV, t
MEDIUM YOUDEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE C0«r iC) JG/L
KEAN RECOVERY (f.)
ACCURACY(1REL ERROR)
OVERALL STD DEV (S)
OVERALL REL STD DEV, %
SINGLE STO OEV, (SR)
ANALYST HEL DEV, I
HIGH YOUOEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(1KEL ERROR)
OVERALL STD DEV (S)
OVERALL REL STD DEV, 1
SINGLE STD DEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL OEV, t
WATER LEGEND
1 - DISTILLED WATEK
2 - TAP WATER
3 - SURFACE WATEK
4 - WASTE WAHR 1
5 - WASTE WATLK 2
6 - WASTE WATEK 3
1
16
8.00
S.85
-26.88
2.78
47.58
1
27
3
15
80.00
58.39
-27.01
23.43
40. \2
9
15
5
16
400.00
302.64
-24.34
117.46
38.81
54
16
2
Ib
10.00
7.66
-23.39
3.82
49.87
.84
.30
4
15
100.00
69.73
-30.27
32,00
45.89
.73
.19
6
16
488.00
378.63
-22.41
142.29
37.58
.56
.02
WATER 2
1
16
8.00
S.H7
-26.56
2.79
47.46
1
23
3
15
80.00
53.28
-33.40
21.22
39.83
9
16
5
16
400.00
291.94
-27. 0
-------
TABLE 66. STATISTICAL SUMMARY FOR 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ANALYSES BY WATER TYPE
WAUR 1
LOW YOUDEN PA IK
NUMBtK OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(IREL ERROR)
OVERALL STO DEV (S)
OVERALL REL STO CEV, I
SINGLE STD PEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL OEV. »
MEDIUM YOUOEN PAIR
NUJt.iER OF OATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(lREl ERROR)
OVERALL STO OEV (S)
OVERALL KEL STD OEV. i
SINGLE STO OEV. (SR)
ANALYST REL OEV. %
HIGH rOUDEN PAIR
NUMBER OF UATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MtAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACYfXREL ERROR)
OVERALL STO OEV (S)
OVERALL HEL STD DEV. t
SINGLE STO OEV. (SR)
ANALYST KEL OEV, *
1
16
8.00
6.90
-13.74
2.51
36.41
0
12
3
16
80.00
69.26
-13.43
9.23
13.32
10
12
5
16
401.00
367.67
-8.31
53. °8
14.68
48
12
2
16
10.00
8.76
-12.43
2.62
29.92
.94
.06
4
16
100.00
B5.18
-14.82
19.19
22.53
.02
.98
6
16
499.00
416.44
-16. 56
103.17
24.77
.03
.26
WATER 2
1
15
8.00
7.72
-3.49
1.94
25.14
1
18
3
14
80.00
67.43
-15.71
12.66
18.78
;
9
5
12
401.00
347.25
-13.40
37.22
10.7?
19
5
2
15
10.00
8.H6
-11.35
2.61
21.48
.50
.08
4
15
100.00
85.39
-14.61
18.83
22.05
.00
.17
6
14
494.00
403.71
-14.10
102.51
25.39
.36
.16
WATER 3
1
18
8.00
/.37
-7.83
2.67
36.25
3
17
80.00
67.46
-15.68
9.79
14.52
5-
17
401.00
335.1?
-16.43
91.96
27.44
2
18
10.00
8.6B
-13.18
2.47
28.39
1.39
17.33
4
18
100.00
89.33
-10.67
17.22
19.27
11.98
15.29
6
IB
449.00
4?9.39
-13.46
122.20
2H.46
34.51)
9.U3
WATER 4
1
17
8.00
6.03
-24.60
2.91
4H.22
3
16
80.00
66.2?
-18.41
14.14
21.66
5
17
401.0')
322. ?4
-19.63
91.70
28.45
2
17
10.00
y.i9
-18.13
3.66
44.65
1.31
18.42
4
17
100.00
73.91
-26.09
17.17
23.23
13.13
18.87
6
17
499.00
375.47
-24.76
99.72
26. 5b
60.88
14.68
WATER 5
1
17
H.OO
6.97
-12.90
1.89
27.18
1
19
3
17
80.00
72.99
-8.76
11.62
15.92
6
7
5
17
401.00
JH1.29
-4.41
76. So
21). 08
4t
11
2
17
10.00
8.96
-10.38
2.91
32.46
.54
.35
4
i:
100.00
90,28
-9.72
17.74
19.66
.01
.36
6
17
494.1)0
462. <'4
-7.37
99.67
21.5h
.96
.13
WATER 6
1
18
H.OO
7.13
-10. H5
3.53
44.44
2
26
3
18
80.00
75.37
-5.78
18.44
24.53
9
11
5
14
401.00
36L,.05
- H . ) b
H6.4}
23. Dd
29
7
2
19
10.00
4.?6
-7.38
3.38
36.55
.in
.63
4
19
100.00
9 t. 32
-6.68
26.02
27.HH
.47
.23
6
1H
44'J ,;iO
4; '. .''6
-9.21
(54.? j
11.59
.4}
.31
WATER LEGEND
1 - OISTILLED WATER
2 - TAP WATER
3 - SURFACE WATER
4 - WASTE WATER 1
5 - WAbTE WATER 2
6 - WASTE WATER 3
-------
TABLE 67. STATISTICAL SUMMARY FOR BROMOFORM ANALYSES BY WATER TYPE
N)
I—»
tn
WATER 1
LOW YOUOEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY (WEL ERROR)
OVERALL STU DEV (S)
OVERALL REL STO DEV. X
SINGLE STO DEV. (SR)
ANALYST REL DEV, I
MEOIUM YOUOEN PAIR
NUMBER Of OAT A POINTS
TRUE CONC (O UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY (13EL ERROR)
OVERALL STD UEV (S)
OVERALL REL STO DEV, *
SINGLE STO OEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL UEV. t
HIGH YOUOEN PAIR
NUMBE" OF OATA POINTS
TRUE CUNC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(IKEL ERROR)
OVEHALL STD UEV (S)
OVERALL REL STO DEV, 1
SINGLED SID OEV, (SR)
-ANALYST REL UEV. 1
WATER LEGEND
1 - UKTILLEO WATER
2 - TAP WATtH
3 - SURFACE WATEH
4 - WASTE WA.JH 1
5 - WASTE WATtH C
b - WASTE WATtH 3
1
lh
8.00
5.64
-29.45
3.41
60.34
1.
21.
3
17
80.00
70.55
-11.82
12.07
17.10
11.
13.
5
17
399.00
393.29
-1.43
95.64
24.32 '
52
11
2
1H
10.00
7.64
-24.64
4.36
57.90
40
27
4
18
101.00
95.62
-5.32
24.22
25.33
.52
.86
6
17
500.00
480.35
-3.93
107.71
22.42
.09
.92
WATER 2
1
14
8,00
5.88
-26.48
2.3-4
39.74
3
17
80.00
79.42
-0.72
19.10
24. US
5
16
399.00
402.56
0.89
99.31
24.67
2
16
10.00
9.14
-8.i9
4.28
46.84
0.96
12.72
4
17
101.00
107.97
6.90
32,28
29.90
12.47
13.31
6
16
500.00
480.75
-3.85
89.54
18.63
33.79
7.65
'"
WATER 3
1
1H
8.00
6.26
-21.79
2.68
42.81
1
22
3
19
80.00
75.20
-6.00
I/. 55
23.33
19
21
5
17
399.00
423.35
6.10
51.47
12.16
59
13
2
18
10.00
8.82
-11.75
3.08
34.85
.73
.88
4
19
101.00
108.7?
7.64
35.52
32. b7
.91
.65
6
18
500.00
496.50
-U. 70
83.31
16.78
.HH
.02
WATER 4
1
14
8.00
7.09
-11.35
2.96
41.73
1
21
3
17
80.00
70.40
-12.00
18.66
26.50
14
17
5
16
3^.00
408.00
2.26
70.49
I/. 28
bO
19
7
15
10. OU
8.54
-14.61
4.U7
47.72
.70
.72
4
17
101.00
88.77
-12. 11
24.14
27.19
.11
.7:
6
15
500 . 00
432.27
-13.55
ril.21
18.79
.05
.05
WATER 5
1
1H
8.00
6.61
-17.38
4.22
63.91
3
47
3
19
80.00
73.37
-8.29
18.43
25.12
5
6
5
18
39i:).i>o
343.78
-1.31
H2.22
2H.84
60
13
2
1H
in. oo
7.69
-23.12
4.61
59.99
.41
.70
4
19
101.00
97.06
-3.90
23.22
23.92
.72
.72
6
19
500.00
49R.M4
-0.23
132.29
26.52
.53
.56
WATER 6
1
17
H.OO
7.06
-11.74
3.81
53.91
3
39
3
19
80.00
73.75
-7.H2
23. M6
32.35
16
19
5
18
39S.UO
44b. 78
11.4.'
62. Ml
13.C8
A?
\:
2
1H
10.00
9.23
-7.69
4.^5
53.63
.18
.03
4
19
101.00
99.45
-1.53
33. bl
33.80
.98
.60
6
17
500.00
490.06
-1.99
83.44
1 7 . U 3
.05
.52
-------
TABLE 68. STATISTICAL SUMMARY FOR CHLOROBENZENE ANALYSES BY WATER TYPE
fo
WATER 1
LOW YOUOEN PAIR
NUMBER OF OA1A POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UU/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(IKEL ERROR)
OVERALL STO DEV (S)
OVERALL KEL STO L)EV, X
SINGLE STO OEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL DEV, I
MEDIUM YOUOEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVEHY (X)
ACCURACY(1KEL EHHO«)
OVERALL SID OEV (S)
OVEPALL REL STU UEV, %
SINGLE STD DEV. (SR)
ANALYST HtL UEV. I
HIGH YUUDEN PAIR
NUMBEK OF DATA POINTS
THUE CONC (C) Uti/1.
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY (iREL EKRUR)
OVERALL STU UEV (S)
OVERALL REL STO UEV, %
S1NULE STO OEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL UEV, t
1
16
8.00
6.77
-15.39
2.07
30.59
1
14
3
17
80.00
80.18
0.23
10.77
13.43
14
16
5
Id
400.00
411.89
2.97
al.23
19.72
56
12
2
18
10.00
8.85
-11.46
3.50
39.51
.11
.15
4
13
100.00
ICO. 27
0.27
21.78
21.72
.92
.53
6
17
500.00
475.82
-4.84
89.84
18.88
.23
.b7
WATER 2
1
18
8.00
6.38
-20.27
2.35
36.82
2
29
3
18
80.00
79.36
-0.80
13.83
17.43
8
9
5
18
400.00
396.56
-O.M6
51. 8J
13.07
32
7
?.
17
10.00
8.90
-11.02
3.13
35.22
.26
.63
4
18
100.00
99.56
-0.44
19.73
19. H2
.52
.53
6
1H
500.00
485.17
-2.97
88. 9B
18.34
.02
.26
WAIER 3
1
18
8.00
7.15
-10.60
2.58
36.12
2
23
3
19
80.00
H2.52
3.14
20.03
24.28
11
13
5
19
400.00
394.05
-1.49
58. H4
14.93
4H
11
2
16
10.00
9.76
-2.38
1.87
19.20
.01
.80
4
17
100.00
96.16
-3. HI
20.49
21.31
.65
.04
6
18
500.00
4h2.9<
-7.41
HO. 9?
17.48
.97
.43
WATER 4
1
H
8.00
102.47
1180.94
132.41
129.21
82
65
3
8
80.00
U0.07
112.59
149. U9
87.6*)
83
39
5
12
4IM.OO
)51 .92
-12.02
244.98
69.61
119
34
2
8
10.1)0
150.25
141)2.50
72.13
48.01
.71 '
.45
4
8
100.00
251.63
151.62
152.50
hU.61
.17
.4b
6
14
500.00
315.79
-32.84
2ilil.y2
59.84
.52
.76
WATER 5
1
15
8.00
6.34
-20.73
2.22
35.04
I.
19
3
16
80.00
72.94
-H.H2
12.69
17. J9
7
9
5
16
400.00
369.75
-'.56
95.35
25.7')
62
H
2
15
10.00
7.27
-27.27
2.60
35. Ml
.31
.19
4
16
100.00
90.95
-9.05
19. 74
21. M
.64
.33
6
16
500.00
469.50
-ft. Ill
92.91
19. '4
.45
.88
WATER 6
1
13
8.00
9.19
14.87
4.50
48.97
3
17
80.00
83.63
4.54
28.12
33.6?
5
18
41111.1)1)
433.06
H.^K
155.08
35.81
2
!0
10.00
12.99
29.89
6.111
46.29
4.28
38.57
4
17
100.00
92.24
-J.lh
34. M
37.5?
18.10
20.59
6
18
5:iu.HO
"j *i ' . s *•
' 3.51
2?3.'<)
39.47
•-15.77
1 J 111
WATEK LEGEND
1 - DISTILLED WATEK
2 - TAP WATER
3 - SURFACE WATER
4 - WASTE WATER 1
5 - WASTE WAFLK 2
6 - WAiTt WA1LK 3
-------
TABLE 69. STATISTICAL SUMMARY FOR 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE ANALYSES BY WATER TYPE
WATER 1
LOW YOUDEN PAIH
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
*AN KECOVEHY (X)
ACCURACY ( IRE L ERROR)
OVERALL STO DEV (i )
OVERALL KEL STO UEV, I
SINGLE STD UEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL DEV, %
MEOIUM YOUDEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE COMC (C) UG/L
teAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY ( IRE L ERROR)
OVERALL STD UEV (S )
OVERALL REL STU DEV, I
SINGLE STU DEV, (Sft)
ANALYST KEL DEV, t
HIGH YOUDEN PAIR
NUMBER OF UATA PO.INTS
TKUE CONC (C) UG/L
HAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY UKEL ERHOH)
OVERALL STU UEV (S )
OVERALL REL STU DEV, t
SINGLE STU OEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL OEV, %
WATER LEGEND
1 - DISTILLED WATER
2 - TAP WATER
3 - SURFACE WATER
4 - WASTE WATER 1
b - WAbTE WAIEK Z
6 - WASTE WATER 3
1
16
8.00
7.50
-6.25
2.23
24. 69
1.
13.
3
19
80.00
31.09
1.37
33.46
41.26
16.
19.
5
18
399. UO
269.83
-32.37
S3. 98
20.00
:&.
a.
2
18
10.00
9.06
-9.36
2.47
27.21
09
16
4
18
100.00
89.86
-10.11
38.63
42.99
96
85
6
17
499.00
327.24
-34.42
33. £3
10.16
0'.'
41
WATER 2
1
16
8.00
6.89
-13.82
2.21
32.09
1
18
3
16
80.00
78.78
-1.52
11.84
15.03
18
21
5
18
399. UO
265. ?2
-33.53
33.99
12.81
34
11
2
15
10.00
8.70
-12.97
2.21
25.36
.45
.54
4
18
100.00
94.69
-b.31
36.51
38.56
.65
.51
6
17
499.00
339.76
-31.91
53.73
15.81
.45
.39
MATER 3
1
15
8.00
7.18
-10.28
1.08
15. UO
1.
18.
3
17
80.00
76.09
-4.89
15. 5U
20.37
9.
1U.
5
19
399.00
298.21
-25.26
83.24
27.91
26.
7.
2
16
10.00
10.32
3.25
1.99
19.32
62
55
4
16
100.00
94.06
-5.94
15.17
16.13
35
99
6
19
499.00
379.42
-23.96
95.60
25.20
77
90
WATER 4
1
15
8.00
7. 88
-1.48
2.53
32.15
2
27
3
19
80.00
79.68
-0.40
32.56
40.86
21
24
5
18
399.00
275.11
-31.05
46.66
16.96
34
11
2
16
10.00
9.U2
-1.78
4.32
44.03
.44
.54
4
IS
100.00
98.51
-1.49
35.40
35.94
.48
.11
6
18
199.00
331.22
-33.62
60.72
18.33
.54
.39
WATER 5
1
17
H.OO
6.88
-13.99
2.75
39.98
1
23
3
19
80.00
73.26
-8.42
31.47
42.95
12
14
5
18
399. UO
268.63
-32.67
71.11
26.47
25
8
2
15
10.00
7.95
-20.49
1.53
19.24
.72
.15
4
19
100.00
98.41
-1.59
36.46
37.05
.21
.22
6
18
499. UO
340. U6
-31.85
59.21)
17.41
.83
.49
WATER 6
1
17
8.00
5.80
-27.49
2.22
38.26
2
31
3
18
80. OU
aa.gy
11.24
34.01
38.22
18
19
b
19
399.00
337. U5
-15.53
130,37
JH.bH
52
14
2
15
10.00
8.63
-13.73
3.11
35.99
.29
.80
4
19
100.00
97.80
-2.20
35.27
36. U6
.26
.55
6
10
499.00
399.05
-20.03
140. 2U
35.13
.55
.28
-------
TABLE 70. STATISTICAL SUMMARY FOR METHYLENE CHLORIDE ANALYSES BY WATER TYPE
CD
HATER 1
LOW YOUDEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) IG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY (%REL ERROR)
OVERALL STO DEV (S)
OVERALL REL STD DEV, X
SINGLE STD DEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL DEV, I
MEDIUM YOUDEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(TREL ERROR)
OVERALL STD DEV (S)
OVERALL REL STD DEV, X
SINGLE STO DEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL DEV, %
HIGH YOUDEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(%REL ERROR)
OVERALL STD DEV (S)
OVERALL REL STU DEV, %
SINGLE STD DEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL DEV, X
WATER LEGEND
1 - DISTILLED WATER
2 - TAP WATER
3 - SURFACE WATER
4 - WASTE WATtR 1
b - WASTE WATER 2
1
16
8.00
6. 40
-20.00
2.64
41.31
3
17
40.00
34.55
-13.63
9.07
26.26
5
18
401.00
363.28
-9.41
94.21
25.93
2
15
10.00
8.26
-17.38
3.37
40.78
1.16
15.84
4
17
50.00
43.05
-13.91
9.37
21.78
4.05
10.45
6
17
501.00
482.41
-3.71
81.08
16.81
52.34
1-2.38
WATtR 2
1
17
8.00
6.50
-18.76
3.25
50.07
2
17
10.00
7.96
-20.39
4.42
55.54
1.69
23.34
3
17
40.00
36.50
-8.75
b.57
15.27
5
19
401.00
411.26
2.56
1)3.42
27.58
4
19
50.00
45.09
-9.82
7.06
15.65
3.42
8.40
6
17
501.00
483.59
-3.48
91.55
18.93
48.88
10.92
WATtR 3
1
16
8.00
5.79
-27.56
2.96
50.99
2
29
3
16
40.00
36.92
-7.69
8.34
22.59
4
10
5
15
401.00
393.33
-1.91
63.04
16.03
43
9
2
15
10.00
7.92
-20.79
4.45
56.16
.02
.41
4
16
50.00
45.98
-8.04
9.70
21.10
.40
.61
6
14
501.00
508.43
1.48
44.79
8.81
.00
.54
WATtR 4
1
17
8.00
6.44
-19.56
2.50
38.81
1
22
3
18
40.00
39.62
-0.94
9.78
24.68
3
7
5
17
401.00
394.00
-1.75
79.61
20.21
51
11
2
17
10.00
7.78
-22.16
3.23
41.43
.63
.95
4
18
50.00
49.38
-1.23
8.21
16.62
.48
.82
6
17
501.00
484.18
-3.36
90.65
18.72
.54
.74
WATER 5
1
19
8.00
7.77
-2.89
2.87
36.98
1
16
3
18
40.00
38 54
-3.64
12.93
33.55
7
17
5
16
401.00
380.63
-5.08
61.22
16.08
40
9
2
17
10.00
9.18
-8.15
2.48
27.02
.36
.09
4
19
50.00
49.85
-0.29
11.87
23.80
.68
.39
6
17
SO 1.00
503.53
0.50
82.23
16.33
.07
.06
WATtR 6
1
18
8.00
7./8
-2.72
4.02
51.61
2.
30.
3
19
40.00
38.33
-4.17
11.93
31.11
10.
24,
b
1?
401.00
390.82
-2,54
43.84
11.22
37.
8.
2
16
10.00
8.38
-16.17
2.54
30.31
46
38
4
20
50.00
46.47
-7.06
14.51
31.23
34
39
6
18
501.00
469.94
-6.20
75.17
15.99
83
,/9
6 - WASTE WATER 3
-------
TABLE 71. STATISTICAL SUMMARY FOR 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ANALYSES BY WATER TYPE
•£>
HATER 1
LOW YOUOEN PAIH
NUMBER OF UATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MtAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY (IKEL ERROR)
OVERALL STD OEV (S)
OVERALL HEL STD OEV, 1
SINGLE STO DEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL DEV, X
MEDIUM YOUOEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DMA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
HE AN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(XREL ERROR)
OVERALL STD DEV (S)
OVERALL REL STD DEV, X
SINGLE STD DEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL DEV. I
HIGH YOUDEN PAIR
NUMBER UF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(IREL ERROR)
OVERALL STD DEV (S)
OVERALL REL STO OEV, »
SINGLE STO OEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL DEV, »
WATER LEGEND
1 - DISTILLED WATER
2 - TAP WATER
3 - SURFACE WATER
4 - WASTt WATtH 1
5 - WASTE WAFER 2
6 - WASTE WATE^ 3
1
17
8.00
6.77
-15.43
1.40
20.72
0
10
3
20
40.00
38.02
-4.95
7.68
20.20
4
9
5
19
400.00
382.95
-4.26
57.34
14.97
35
8
2
19
10.00
7.94
-20.60
2.77
34.90
.80
.92
4
18
50.00
45.83
-8.33
7.22
15.75
.02
.59
6
18
499.00
463.56
-7.10
51.25
11.06
.17
.31
WATER 2
1
18
8.00
5.42
-32.19
2.09
38.45
1
16
3
17
40.00
34.97
-12.57
5.31
15.19
3
7
5
17
400.00
390.47
-2.38
60.57
15.51
47
11
2
17
10.00
7.22
-27.82
2.50
34.70
.07
.94
4
18
50.00
45.20
-9.60
8.75
19.35
.03
.56
6
18
499.00
434.22
-12.98
111.7b
25.73
.66
.56
WATER 3
1
20
8.00
5. HO
-27.47
2.00
34.48
1
15
3
20
40.00
36.40
-9.00
7.47
20.53
2
6
5
19
400.00
386.32
-3.42
52.50
13.59
28
6
2
18
10.00
8.31
-16.93
1.92
23.07
.08
.35
4
20
50.00
47.90
-4.20
8.02
16.73
.59
.13
6
19
499. 01)
472.89
-5.23
58.21
12.31
.16
.56
WATER 4
1
17
8.00
7.06
-11.76
1.35
19.08
1
21
3
17
40.00
39.51
-1.22
5.14
13.02
8
1H
5
17
400.00
402.94
0.74
42.47
10.54
41
9
2
17
10.00
7.91
-20.94
3.01
38.12
.62
.58
4
18
50.00
49.25
-1.50
10.87
22.08
.20
.47
6
18
499.00
46U.67
-7.68
94.52
20.52
.34
.57
WATER 5
1
18
8.00
7.20
-10.06
2.72
37.75
1
14
3
18
40.00
37.83
-5.42
8.07
21.32
6
16
5
17
400.00
386.94
-3.26
46.29
11.96
50
11
2
15
10.00
9.51
-4.89
1.29
13.58
.25
.99
4
18
50.00
46.95
-6.10
9.31
19.83
.79
.01
6
1H
499. UO
476. 5U
-4.51
92.4?
19.40
.13
.61
WATER 6
1
18
8.00
7.26
-9.24
1.26
17.29
1.
14,
3
ia
40.00
38.24
-4.39
5.21
13.63
6.
14.
5
17
400. UO
384.94
-3.76
45. U2
11.70
42.
9.
2
17
10. UO
P. 50
-14.97
1.69
19.86
,13
,33
4
19
60.00
47.21
-5.58
10.13
21.46
15
39
6
18
499.00
460.50
-7.72
U.45
18.34
15
9?
-------
TABLE 72. STATISTICAL SUMMARY FOR 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ANALYSES BY WATER TYPE
WATER 1
LOH YOUDEN PAIR
NUMBER OF OATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(XREL ERROR)
OVERALL STU DEV (S)
OVERALL REL STO OEV, X
SINGLE STO OEV, (SR)
ANALYST HEL OEV, X
MLOIUM YOUDEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(XREL ERROR)
OVERALL STD DtV (S)
OVERALL REL STO OEV, X
SINGLE STO DEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL DEV, X
HIGH YOUDEN PAIR
NUMBER OF OATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (Xf-
ACCU«ACY(XREL ERROR)
OVERALL STO UEV (S)
OVERALL REL STD DEV, X
SINGLE STD DEV. (SR)
ANALYST KEL OEV, X
HATER LEGEND
1 - DISTILLED HATER
2 - TAP HATER
3 - SURFACE WATER
4 - HASTE WATER 1
5 - WASTE WATER 2
6 - WASTE WATER 3
1
16
8.00
7.06
-11.80
1.9?
27.92
1
18
3
17
40.00
41.04
2.59
5.20
12.66
6
12
5
16
399.00
401.38
0.60
62.50
15.57
45
9
2
16
10.00
9.71
-2.89
2.60
26.75
.57
.73
4
17
50.00
52.52
5.05
10.38
19.76
.02
.88
6
16
500.00
521.56
4.31
87.38
16.85
.86
.94
WA'i ER 2
1
17
8.00
7.68
-4.01
2.46
32.06
2
25
3
17
40.00
40.62
1.54
8.33
20.51
4
9
5
'7
399.00
417.47
4.63
80.17
19.20
30
6
2
15
10.00
10.03
0.33
3.22
32.07
.24
.32
4
16
50.00
51.22
2.45
8.74
17.07
.57
.96
6
17
500.00
498.06
-0.39
93.75
18.82
.38
.64
WATER 3
1
19
8.00
6.25
-21.85
1.79
28.69
3
18
40.00
39.06
-2.35
5.58
14.28
5
19
399.00
383.00
-4.01
98.16
25.63
2
18
10.00
8.43
-15.71
2.88
34.13
1.33
18.16
4
19
50.00
50,42
0.83
7.72
15.31
4.83
10.81
6
18
500.00
501.67
0.33
85.34
17.01
34.06
7.70
WATER 4
1
14
8.00
21.05
163.12
18.16
86.27
10
58
3
17
40.00
44.54
11.36
22.04
49.48
16
35
5
17
399.00
401.12
0.53
99.35
24.77
86
19
2
13
10.00
15.62
56.24
12.63
80.84
.76
.68
4
17
50.00
46.93
-6.14
20.14
47.91
.43
.92
6
18
500.00
491.95
-1.61
169.96
34.55
.05
.27
WATER 5
1
18
8.00
8.45
5.64
2.57
30.37
1
15
3
17
40.00
40.14
0.34
8.72
21.72
4
9
5
16
399.00
382. 6S
-4.U9
50.00
13.07
49
11
2
15
10.00
9.96
-0.43
2.50
25.15
.46
.89
4
17
50.00
49.14
-1.72
9.04
18.40
.06
.10
6
ia
5oo.no
487.67
-Z.47
117.??
24.15
.63
.40
WATER 6
1
9
8.00
53.23
565.42
56.90
106. Bb
2(1
37
3
7
40.00
40.29
U. 71
20.29
50.36
30
70
5
i ;
399.00
427.46
7.13
255.26
59.72
135
32
2
p
10.00
56. o;
460.75
53.59
95.56
.61
.71
4
10
50.00
45.59
-8.82
35.62
7R.13
.17
.26
6
17
500.00
408.64
-18.27
291.28
71.28
.33
.37
-------
TABLE 73. STATISTICAL, SUMMARY FOR BROMODICHLOROMETHANE ANALYSES BY WATER TYPE
NJ
NJ
WATER 1
LOW YOUOEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
HE AN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY (SREL ERROR)
OVERALL STO DEV (S)
OVERALL REL STO DEV, I
SINGLE STD OEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL DEV, %
MEDIUM YOUOEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(1REL ERROR)
OVERALL STO OEV (S)
OVERALL REL STD UEV, %
SINGLE STO DEV, (SR)
ANALYST HEL OEV, S
HKiH YOUOEN PAIR
NUMBER OF UATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(IREL EKROP)
OVERALL STD DEV (S)
OVERALL REL STO tfEV, %
SINGIE STO DEV. (SR)
ANALYST REL OEV, 1
WATER LEGENO
1 - DISTILLED WATER
1
15
8.00
8.07
0.92
2.56
31.66
1.
11.
3
17
40.00
50.72
26.81
7.20
14.20
5.
9.
5
18
394.00
400.33
1.61
84.48
21.10
55.
12.
2
16
10.00
9.38
-6.19
3.08
32.88
01
59
4
18
50.00
58.72
17.44
11.99
20.42
22
53
6
18
501.00
512.44
2.28
136.48
26.63
.84
23
WATER 2
1
13
8.00
8.35
4.40
4.10
49.10
2
26
3
17
40.00
47.09
17.72
9.46
20.08
10
20
5
16
394.00
378.44
-3.95
65.29
17.25
40
9
2
14
10.00
11.60
16.04
6.17
53.16
.64
.44
4
17
50.00
53.15
6.29
14.38
27.06
.21
.38
6
16
5C1.00
443. B8
-11.40
87.38
19.69
.49
.85
WATER 3
1
17
8.00
7.08
-11.46
2.41
34.01
1
14
3
17
40.00
50.64
26.60
7.52
14.85
4
7
5
16
394.00
391.69
-0.59
74.92
19.13
48
10
2
15
10.00
9.36
-6.40
2.78
29.69
.18
.38
4
17
50.00
58.24
16.47
6.93
11.90
.06
.46
6
17
501.00
511.53
2.1U
129.98
25.41
.10
.65
WATER 4
1
18
8.00
9.34
16.75
5.19
55.53
2
21
3
18
40.00
53.23
33.07
12. H8
24.20
6
12
5
16
394.00
393.31
-0.17
74.08
18.84
46
10
2
16
10.00
10.16
i.64
3.39
33.32
.07
.27
4
17
50.00
55.08
10.16
11.32
20.54
,53
.06
6
17
501.00
504.09
0.72
143.96
28.51
.82
.43
HATEK 5
1
16
8.00
7.93
-0.87
2.90
36.58
1
21
3
17
40.00
50.25
25.63
9.71
19.32
7
13
5
16
394.00
400.94
1.76
116.95
29.17
30
6
2
14
10.00
10.39
3.91
3.30
31.81
.97
.49
4
17
I.. 00
56.39
12.78
10.14
17.98
.24
.58
6
15
501.00
466.47
-2.90
122.43
25.17
.70
.92
WATER 6
1
18
8.00
10.21
27.58
5.25
51.47
3,
35,
3
18
40.00
48. d4
22.11
14.13
28.94
10.
20.
5
1H
394.00
379.44
-3.b9
94.95
25.02
40.
9.
2
15
10.00
9.00
-10.05
3.18
35.34
,44
,81
4
18
50.00
5'.?1
14.41
11.71
20.47
7H
33
6
18
501.00
4/-J.OO
-5.59
1
-------
TABLE 74. STATISTICAL SUMMARY FOR 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANF ANALYSES BY WATER TYPE
K>
WATER 1
LOW YOUDEN PA IK
NUMBEH Of OATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCUHACYflHEL ERROR)
OVERALL STO OEV (S)
OVERALL KEL STO DEV, I
SINGLE STO DEV. (SRI
ANALYST REL OEV. %
MEDIUM YOUDEN PAIK
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
M£AN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY (IHEL ERROR)
OVERALL STO OEV (S)
OVERALL REL STO OEV, I
SINGLE STO OEV. (SR)
ANALYST HEL DEV, I
HIGH YOUOEN FAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(IREL ERROR)
OVERALL STO DEV (S)
OVERALL REL STD OEV, 1
SINGLE STO OEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL DEV, %
MATER LEGEND
1 - OtSTIUtO HATER
2 - TAP WAUK
3 - SUKFACE WATER
4 - WASTE WAUK I
5 - WASTE WAIEH Z
6 - WASTE WATLK 3
1
14
8.00
7.!6
-10.46
3.30
46.04
2
24
3
15
80.00
67.52
-15.60
17.06
25.27
14
16
5
15
400.00
421.00
5.25
138.73
32.95
99
20
2
14
10.00
10.63
6.26
4.04
38.01
.14
.09
4
15
100.00
106.10
6.10
31.09
29.30
.59
.81
6
15
499.00
542.80
8.78
158.79
29.25
.06
.56
WATER 2
1
13
8.00
e.26
3.24
2.25
27.26
1
12
3
13
80.00
62.22
-22.22
11.05
17.75
18
21
5
15
400.00
398.73
-0.32
129.91
32.58
73
15
2
13
10.00
12.39
23. 9b
3.31
26.70
.30
.58
4
15
100. UO
105.73
5.73
27.20
25.73
.11
,56
6
15
499.00
539.67
a. 15
172.09
31.89
.52
.67
WATER 3
1
14
8.00
6.??
-15.34
2.11
31.15
1
20
3
14
80. UO
56.06
-29.93
11.87
21.18
8
11
5
14
400.00
385.14
-3.71
108.00
28.04
57
12
2
13
10.00
9.09
-9.09
3.34
36.69
.60
.14
4
13
100.00
95.22
-4.78
13.36
14.04
.55
.31
6
14
499.00
502.07
0.62
104.99
20.91
.03
.86
WATER 4
1
9
8.00
12.78
59.78
10.74
84.05
5.
41.
3
12
80.00
58.62
-26.72
26.89
45.87
13.
17.
5
15
400.00
415.33
3.83
96.27
23.18
93.
20.
2
9
!O.Ut)
11.83
18. ?3
9.65
81.52
06
07
4
14
100.00
89.13
-10.87
39.73
44.58
05
66
6
15
499.00
4«0.87
-3.63
138.73
28.85
19
80
WATER 5
1
16
8.00
7.52
-6.05
4.32
57.50
3.
36.
3
15
80.00
62.33
-22.08
14.71
23.60
21.
26.
5
16
400.00
448.81
12.20
151.99
33.86
88.
17.
2
14
10.00
9.87
-1.30
3.83
38.85
17
44
4
16
100.00
105.44
5.44
41.39
39.25
99
21
6
16
499. UO
583.19
16.87
165.33
28.35
03
06
WATCH 6
1
12
8.00
10.60
32.48
5.60
52.83
4
39
3
14
80.00
83.09
3.87
33,98
40.89
2S
25
b
14
400. UO
4«7.U7
11.77
149.77
33.50
91
1«
2
11
10.00
11.95
19.49
7.23
60.47
.47
.65
4
1"
100. 00
119.53
19.53
48.47
40.55
.64
.31
6
14
499.00
545.36
9.29
134. Ob
24. S8
.99
.54
-------
TABLE 75. STATISTICAL SUMMARY FOR C/S-1,3-DICI.LOROPROPENE ANALYSES BY WATER TYPE
NJ
U)
HATER 1
LOU YOUDEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA P01NIS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY (IREL ERROR)
I'VtRALL STD DEV (S)
OVERALL REL STD OEV, I
SINGLE STD DEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL DEV, I
MEDIUM YOUDt ?! PAIR
«LW8ER Of DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY (XREL ERROR)
OVERALL STD DEV (S)
OVERALL REL STO DEV, %
SINGLE STD DEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL DtV, *
HIGH YOUDEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(tREL ERROR)
OVERALL STD DEV (S)
OVERALL REL STO DEV, %
SINGLE STD DEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL OEV, I
HATER LEGEND
1 - DISTILLED WATER
2 - TAP HATER
3 - SURFACE HATES
4 - WASTE WATLK 1
5 - WASIE HATER 2
6 - HASTE HATER 3
1
13
8.00
3.32
-58.45
0.85
25.68
0,
20,
3
15
80.00
44.90
-43.88
14.79
32.94
5
11
5
15
400.00
240.13
-39.97
90.65
37.75
28
11
2
14
10.00
5.79
-42.11
2.41
41.55
.92
.16
4
15
100.00
59.66
-40.34
25.18
42.21
.93
.34
6
14
488.00
274.36
-43.78
93.68
34.15
.95
.25
WATER 2
1
12
8.00
3.70
-53.78
2.31
62.55
0
16
3
13
80.00
38.72
-51.60
7.43
19.18
9
19
5
15
400.00
270.80
-32.30
)2?.49
45.23
41
15
2
10
10.00
4.96
-50.36
1.10
22.12
.71
.32
4
15
100.00
61.12
-38.88
27.93
45.70
.74
.51
6
14
488.00
279.43
-42.74
93.90
33.61
.81
.20
WATER 3
1
16
8.00
4.25
-46.91
2.65
62.28
1
22
3
17
80.00
41.70
-47.87
17.15
41.12
14
31
5
15
400.00
206.13
-48.47
71.58
34.72
43
16
2
14
10.00
5.70
-42.96
2.66
46.60
.14
.88
4
17
100.00
49.20
-50.80
20.96
42.59
.23
.30
6
17
488.00
336.85
-30.97
272.56
80.91
.99
.20
WATER 4
1
11
8.00
3.66
-54.31
1.7H
48.70
2
5R
3
15
80.00
44.59
-44.26
15.99
35.85
10
21
5
16
400.00
268.81
-32.80
137.93
51.31
67
23
2
10
10.00
6.24
-37.60
4.Uo
65.10
.89
.51
4
16
100.00
56.84
-43.16
24.79
43.62
.71
.13
6
16
488.00
320.75
-34.27
185.13
57.72
.86
.0?
HATFH 5
1
15
8.00
4.90
-38.76
4.02
82.04
1
19
3
16
80.00
49.81
-37.73
25.77
51.74
13
27
5
15
400.00
177.10
-55.72
7J.92
41.74
27
13
2
12
10.00
5.22
-47.79
3.25
62.33
.01
.88
4
17
10U.CO
49.07
-50.93
11.65
23.74
.42
.14
6
14
488.00
231.41
-52.58
93.64
40.46
.66
.54
WATER 6
1
12
8.00
4.38
-45.22
2.46
56.04
2.
43.
3
15
80.00
4C.15
-42.43
21.61
46.92
7.
15.
6
14
4UU.OO
197.93
-50.52
70.48
35.61
52.
23.
2
\7
10. (JO
«.4H
-15.23
4.78
56.42
82
84
*
14
100.00
52.62
-0.38
17.24
32.76
76
73
6
13
4 MS. 00
251.79
-4«.40
74.03
?9.40
5d
Jri
-------
TABLE 76. STATISTICAL SUMMARY FOR 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ANALYSES BY WATCR TYPE
N>
N>
WATER 1
LOW YOUDEN PAIR
NUH8EK Of DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVEHY (X)
ACCURACY(WEL ERROR)
OVERALL STD DEV (S)
OVERALL REL STD DEV, %
SINGLE StO OEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL DEV. I
MEDIUM YOUDEN PA1K
NUMBER Of DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(WEL ERROR)
OVERALL STD DEV (S)
OVERALL REL STO DEY, X
SINGLE STD CEV. (ixj
ANALYST REL DEV. %
HIGH YOUDEN PAIR
NUMBER Of DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY (%REL ERROR)
OVERALL STD OEV (S)
OVERALL REL STD OEV. »
SINGLE STD DEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL OEV, %
WATER LEGEND
1 - DISTILLED WATER
Z - TAP WATER
3 - SURFACE WATEK
4 - WASTE WATEK 1
5 - WASTE WATEK 2
6 - WASTE WAT IK 3
1
16
8.00
8.33
4.16
6.13
73.52
3
41
J
It)
80.00
75.57
-5.54
17.77
23.51
1?
14
'5
17
400.00
381.41
-4.65
94.50
Z4.78
68
15
2
15
10.00
8.90
-11.04
3.24
36.41
.60
.82
4
18
100.00
95.8«
-4.11
25.89
26.99
.56
.65
fi
18
'.99.00
485.44
-2.72
124.14
25.57
.70
.85
WATEK 2
1
14
8.00
6.01
-24.90
2.32
38.56
2.
27.
3
16
80.00
68.26
-14.67
13.77
20.17
9.
11.
5
16
400.00
391.19
-2.20
101.85
26.04
38.
9.
2
14
10.00
9.80
-2.01
4.99
50.91
15
25
4
16
100.00
90.37
-9.63
16.71
18.49
18
57
6
15
499.00
465.53
-6.71
86.12
18.50
83
07
WATER 3
1
16
8.00
6.70
-16.21
2.12
31.69
1
24
3
18
80.00
74.18
-7.28
19.46
26.24
8
10
5
18
400.00
383.61
.-4.10
107.08
27.91
58
13
I
15
10.00
9.26
-7.40
3 Oi
32. 9H
.93
.21
,!
Id
100.00
93 89
-6.11
21. 6
2:. 29
.67
.31
6
18
499.00
506.50
1.50
141.23
27.88
.89
.21
WATFR 4
1
12
8.00
18.71
133.87
19.28
103.07
11
87
3
16
80.1)0
71.91
-10.11
41.24
57.35
29
39
5
18
400.00
431.67
7.92
193.94
44.93
62
13
2
11
10.00
8.06
-19.35
6.3/
78.99
.65
.06
4
16
100.00
78.09
-21.91
25.08
32.12
.92
.89
6
17
499.00
471.12
-5.59
156.82
33.29
.41
.83
WATER 5
1
16
8.00
6.96
-12.97
2.84
40.85
2.
26.
3
18
80.00
70.42
-11.98
23.87
33.90
14.
17.
5
18
400. UO
351.72
-12.07
95.53
27.16
65.
15.
2
15
10.00
9.32
-6.82
4.88
52.37
17
70
4
18
100.00
88.54
-11.46
28.81
32.54
21
88
6
18
499.00
493.28
-1.15
133.62
27.09
68
SI
WATEH 6
1
18
8.00
9.38
P. 28
5.23
55.74
3
38
3
19
80.00
82.09
2.62
22.32
27.19
19
22
5
19
4QO.OO
412.11
3.03
134.41
32.61
5b
12
2
I/
10.00
10.46
4.61
5.59
53.42
.83
.56
4
19
luo.ua
94.16
-5.84
24.63
26.15
.66
.31
6
19
499.00
522.34
4.78
160.94
3U.78
.34
.16
-------
TABLE 77. STATISTICAL SUMMARY FOR 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE ANALYSES BY WATER TYPE
U1
WATER 1
LOW VOUDEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY (IREL £«RO«)
OVERALL STO DEV (S)
OVERALL REL STO DEV. I
SINGLE STU DEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL DEV, X
MEDIUM YOUDEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
TRUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY(tREL ERROR)
OVERALL SID OEV (S)
OVERALL REL STD DEV, I
SINGLE STD DEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL OEV. I
HIGH YOUDEN PAIR
NUMBER OF DATA POINTS
THUE CONC (C) UG/L
MEAN RECOVERY (X)
ACCURACY (%REL ERROR)
OVERALL STD OEV (S)
OVERALL REL STO DEV, 1
SINGLE STD DEV, (SR)
ANALYST REL DEV, I
WATER LEGEND
1 - DISTILLED WATER
2 - TAP WATER
3 - SURFACE WATER
4 - WASTE WAIEH 1
b - WASTE WATU 2
6 - HASTE WAFtK 3
1
17
8.00
8.99
12.37
4.98
55.42
3
41
3
18
80.00
75.24
-5.94
20. 45
27.18
13
14
6
18
399.00
373.33
-6.43
100.29
26.86
69
16
2
16
10.00
8.33
-16. 71
4.24
50.90
.57
.24
4
19
100.00
105.95
5.95
33.45
31.57
.12
.43
6
18
500.00
455.22
-8.96
11Z. 48
24.71
.86
.86
WATER 2
i
1
15
8.00
6.78
-15.26
3.13
46.21
1
23
3
17
80.00
70.08
-12.40
16.59
23.68
13
16
5
18
399.00
353.47
-11.41
135.87
38.44
63
15
T
(.
14
10.00
9.55
-4.52
3.70
38.76
.90
.22
4
17
100.00
93.69
-6.31
16.85
17.98
.16
.07
6
17
500,00
461.65
-7.67
85.47
18.51
.28
.53
WAT:
1
16
8.UO
7.96
-0.47
2.61
32.75
1.
20.
3
19
80.00
84.06
5.08
2J.95
28.49
1>.
1,.
5
19
399. OU
392. OU
-1.75
96. t-4
24. 6b
55.
15.
R 3
2
13
10.00
8.63
13.68
2.62
30.31
69
35
4
18
100.00
94.66
-5.34
20.40
21.55
68
31
6
19
500.00
469.79
-6,04
97.00
20.65
51
20
WATER 4
1
14
8.00
H.95
11.91
4.94
55.20
1
25
3
19
80.00
74.98
-6.27
18.98
25.31
18
22
5
19
399.00
383. Sb
-3.77
120.08
31.27
85
19
2
14
10.00
6.92
-30. ?6
2.51
36.25
.99
.10
4
19
100.00
89.74
-10. 2b
22.79
?5.40
.30
.22
6
!9
500.00
49b.b8
-U.H8
158.97
32.08
.4S
.43
WATER 5
1
17
8. 00
7. 55
-5.48
3.94
52.05
1
23
3
18
80.00
79.04
-1.20
20.85
26.37
13
17
b
18
399.00
34'v . n 3
-14. b8
64.76
19.00
53
12
2
15
10.00
7.20
-28.03
2.24
31.14
.70
.00
4
18
100=00
89.49
-10.51
19.04
21.28
.44
.14
6
18
500. UO
"d>.89
-3.42
82.14
17. Ul
.05
.88
WATER 6
1
16
8.00
7.41
-7.41
3.32
44.86
2,
2
15
10.00
7.00
-30.00
2.62
37,41
,92
40.53
3
18
80.00
76. 0;
-4.99
15.21
20.01
I'.
16.
b
17
399. UO
346.17
-13.1 1
88. 15
2b.44
51.
12.
4
19
100.00
9S.92
-4.08
29.24
30.48
17
44
6
19
500. 1)0
47b.'!0
- 4 . 80
1D'J.06
Jl.OZ
76
59
-------
APPENDIX E
EFFECTS OF WATER TYPE ON PRECISION AND ACCURACY
226
-------
TABLE 78. EFFECT OF WATER TYPE ON TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE ANALYSIS
** POINT ESTIMATES ••
OISTILLEO WATEK SLOPE:GAHHA(1) « .99915
WATER INTERCEPT(WATER-DISTILLEO) SLOPE(WATER-D1ST ILLE1;)
-.2449
-.0630
-.0346
-.1917
-.2U7
.04',7
.0752
.0195
.0423
.0511
SOURCE
•* ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE •*
OF SUM OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARE
KEG(OISTILLEO) I 1728.09191
REG(WATER/DIST!LLED) 10 1.30668
ERROR 601 69.09710
1728.09191
.13067
F
PROS
1.14 .3321
TOTAL
612 1798.49b69
•• TABLE OF 951 CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INTERCEPTS AND THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SLOPES **
WATEH
INTERCEPTjWATEK-OlSTILLED)
ESTIMATE INTERVAL
SLOPE(WATER-OISTILLEO)
INTERVAL
2
3
4
5
6
-.2449
-.0630
-.0346
-.1917
-.2137
( -.6987 .
( -.4181 .
( -,3B'j8 ,
( -.5S14 .
( -.5707 .
.1089)
.2922)
.3167)
.1681)
.1433)
.0457 (
.0252 (
.0195 (
.0423 (
.0511 (
-.0355 ,
-.0562 .
-.0612 ,
-.0403 .
-.030S ,
.1269)
.1066)
.1002)
.1249)
.1328)
NOTE: IF ZERO IS CONTAINED WITHIN A GIVEN CONFIDENCE INTERVAL THEN THERE IS NO STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE BETWEEN
UlSTILLEO WATtK ANU THE CORRESPONDING WASTE HATER fOR THE ASSOCIATED PARAMETEK(INTERCEPT/SLOPE).
THE SLOPE ANO INTERCEPT ESTIMATES FROM THIS ANALYSIS ARE NOT THE SAME AS THOSE OBTAINED FROM THE PRECISION
AND ACCORACY REGRESSIONS PERFORMED EAHL1EH.
-------
TABLE 79. EFFECT OF WATER TYPE ON CHLOROMETHANE ANALYSIS
•• POINT ESTIMATES **
DISTILLED WATER SLOPE:GAMMA(\) * 1.02998
WATER INTEKCEPT(WATER-OISTILLEO) SLOPEfWATER-DISTILLED)
-.0027
-.0517
-.0832
.0274
.50/6
.0324
.0553
.0584
-.0089
-.0672
SOURCE
** ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE **
DF SUM OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARE
CD
REG(DISTILLED) 1 1593.20511 1593.20511
REG(WATEH/D1STILLED) 10 7.17013 .7U01
ERROR 561 259.16800 .46198
TOTAL
572 1859.54325
PR 08
1.S5 .1175
** TABLE Of 95% CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR THE DIFFERENCES ttETWEtN INTERCEPTS AND THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SLOPES
WATER
1NTERCEPT(WATER-U;STILLED)
ESTIMATE INTtHVAL
SLUPE(WATEH-OISTILLEO)
ESTIMATE INTtHVAL
2
3
4
5
6
-.0027
-.0517
-.UH32
.02/9
.50 76
-.7475
-.7970
-.H21R
-.7164
-.2680
.7420)
.6936)
.6554)
.7/21)
1.2833)
.0324
.05^3
.0KH4
-.0189
-.06/2
-.I37b
-.1147
-.1100
-.1787
( -.2435
.2024)
. 2 <"' b 4 )
.226HJ
.Ift'.Mj
.1091)
NOTE: IF ZE'.0 IS rjNTAlNEU WITHIN A GIVEN CONFIDE NT t INTERVAL THEN TMLRE IS NU STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE BETWEEN
DISTILLED WATER AHO THE CORRESPOND! NG WAbTE WATtK FUW THE AbSUCIATEl) PAKAME TLKJ I NIEKCt PT/ SLOPE ).
THE SLOPE AND INTERCEPT ESTIMATES FROM THIS ANALYSIS ARE NOT THE SAME AS THOSE OBTAINED FROM THE PRECISION
AND ACCURACY REGRESSIONS PEHHIRMEU EARLIER.
-------
TABLE 80. EFFECT OF WATER TYPE ON VINYL CHLORIDE ANALYSIS
»• POINT ESTIMATES **
DISTILLED WATER SLOPE:GAMMA(1) . 1.02245
WATER INTERCEPT(WATER-DISTILLEO) SLOPE(WATER-OISTILLED)
-.1717
-.221,2
-.2624
.0369
.0384
.0?89
.0658
SOURCE
vD
•* ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE **
OF SUM OF S()OAHES MEAN SIJUARE
REG(OISTILLEO) 1 1697.74002 1697.790J2
HEGJWATER/OISTILLED) 10 1.75323 .1/532
ERROR S60 54.36370 .U9/U8
F-KOB
l.t'l .0567
TOTAL
671 1753,40695
TA8LE Of 95t CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INTERCEPTS ANU THE DIFFERENCES liENEEN SLOPES ••
1NTERCEPT(WATEH-UI STILLED)
WATER ESTIMATE INTERVAL
2 -.1717 ( -.5119 .
3 -.OH25 ( -.4146 .
1 -.Sttt ( -.5d56 ,
6 -.,'624 ( -.54)5 ,
6 .0369 (
SLOME(^ATER-JISTtLLED)
ESTIMATE INTERVAL
.1686)
.?54l>)
.1147)
. '1 1 4 7 )
.37/9)
.03.-M ( -.oJ'H .
.11?.-)') ( -.iH.H.-i
,0h5tl ( -.01 Jl ,
.DS7») ( -.(1,'Mij
.01/4 ( -.Hhb7 ,
.11/1)
. I0t. 6)
.1407)
. 1 JS3)
.1)416)
NOTE: IF ZERO IS CONTAINED WITHIN A GIVEN CONFIDE MCE INTERVAL THEN THIRL IS NO s'ATISTICM Sli.NlFUANU UE'TWEEN
EU WATER ANO TML CORKESPONUl NL. WASTE WATER \ OK THE A'j!>UC IATE I) PARAML i ER( I NTt KLEPT/SLUPL ) .
T'lE SLOPE AND INTERCEPT ESTIMATES FROM THIS ANALYSIS AKE NOT THE SAMt AS THU'.E OlUAINED MOM TH|_ PRECISION
AUD ALCUHACT REGRESSIONS PEKFORHEU EARLIER.
-------
TABLE 81. EFFECT OF WATER TYPE ON TRANS-1,2-D1CHLOROETHENE ANALYSIS
•* POINT ESTIMATES *•
DISTILLED WATER SLOPE:GAMMA(1) = 1.00323
WATER INTERCEPT(WATER-OISTILLEO) SLOPE(WATER-DISTILLED)
2 -.2593 .0454
3 -.0669 .0231
4 -.1852 .0384
5 -.0142 .0107
6 -.1057 .0270
**
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE
tJ SOURCE DF SOM OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARE F PROB
O
REG(DISTtLLEO) 1 1856.56630 1856.56630
REGfWATER/DISTILLED) 10 1.25158 .12516 1.0* .3899
ERROR 643 75.80354 .11/89
TOTAL 654 1933.62142
TABLE OF 95% CONflDENCE INTERVALS FOR THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INTERCEPTS ANO THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SLOPES
1NTERCEPT(WATER-UibTILLED) SLOPE(WATER-D!STILLED)
WATER ESTIMATE INTERVAL ESMMATE INTERVAL
2 -.2593 ( -.6094 , .0908) .0454 ( -.0343 , .125!)
3 -.06b9 ( -.4068 , .2/29) .0231 ( -.0547 , .1010)
4 -.1852 ( -.5783 , .15/8) .0184 ( -.0402 . .1171)
5 -.0142 ( -.3583 , .3299) .0107 ( -.Ob85 , .UH99)
6 -.1057 ( -.4t)3H . .24<:4)
NOT£: IF ZERO IS CONTAINED WITHIN A GIVEN CONFIDENCE INTLnVAL THEN THERE IS NO jTAMSTlCAL S1GN1HCANCL BETWEEN
DISTILLED WATER AND THE CORRESPONDING WASTE WATER IOR THE ASSUUAUK PAHAML TER( 1 N rtRCEPT/MOPt).
THE SLOPE ANO INTERCEPT ESTIMATES FROM THIS AfvALfSIS AwE NUT THE SAME AS THOSE OHTAINED FROM THE PRECISION
ANO ACCURACY REGRESSIONS PERFORMED EARLIER.
-------
TABLE 82. EFFECT OF WATER TYPE ON 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE ANALYSIS
** POINT ESTIMATES **
DISTILLED WATER SLOPE:GAMMA(1) = .98541
WATER INTERCEPT(WATEH-DISTILLEO) SLOPE(WATER-DISTILLEO)
.1249
.0946
-.1928
.0435
.2091
-.0336
-.0120
.0390
-.0060
-.0145
to
u>
SOURCE
** ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE **
OF SUM OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARE
KEG(OISTILLED) 1 1585.93530 1585.93530
REGJWATER/DISTILLEO) 10 3.09921 .30992
ERHOH 603 74.43980 .12345
F PHOB
2.51 .OU58
TOTAL
614 1663.47432
** TABLE OF 95% CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INTERCEPTS AND THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SLOPES **
WATER
INTERCEPT(WATER-lM STILLED)
ESTINATE INTERVAL
SLOPE(WATEK-OISTILLEO)
ESTIMATE INTERVAL
2
3
4
5
6
.1249 (
.0946 (
-.1928 (
.0435 (
.2091 (
-.2492 ,
-.2789 ,
-.5666 ,
-.32H6 ,
-.1651 ,
.4990)
.4682
.181U)
.4155)
.5834)
-.0336 \
-.0120 1
.0390 (
-.0060 (
-.0145 (
-.1184
-.0975
-.0458
-.0907
-.0993
.0512)
.0735)
.1237)
.(HK71
.0703)
NOTE: II- ZERO IS CONTAINED WITHIN A GIVEN CONFIDENCE INTERVAL THEN THERE IS NO STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE BETWEEN
DISTILLED WAlER AND THE CORRESPONDING WASTE WATER FOR THE ASSOCIATED PArtAMETER(INTERCEPT/M.OPE).
THE SLOPE AND INTERCEPT ESTIMATES FROM THIS ANALYSIS ARE NOT THE SAME AS THOSE OBTAINED FROM THE PRECISION
AND ACCURACY REGRESSIONS PEKFORMEl) EARLIER.
-------
TABLE 83. EFFECT OF WATER TYPE ON TRICHLOROETHENE ANALYSIS
** POINT ESTIMATES **
DISTILLED WATER SLOPE:GAMMA(1) = .96123
WATER INTERCEPT(WATER-DISTILLED) SLOPE(WATER-DISTILLED)
-.0538
-.1879
-.2026
-.0968
.0/68
.0153
.0483
.0170
.0380
-.0020
N)
U>
K)
SOURCE
** ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE **
OF SUM OF SQUARES MEAN SO.UARE
REG(DISTILLEO) 1 1496.26068 1496.26068
HEG(WATER/OISTILLED) 10 1.16/63 .11676
ERROR 564 68.36207 .12121
TOTAL
575 1565.79039
PR 08
.96 .4745
** TABLE OF 951 CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INTERCEPTS AND THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SLOPES
WATER
INTEHCEPT(WATEK-DISniLED)
ESTIMATE INTERVAL
SLOPE(WATER _i:>TILLtD)
ESTIMATE INTERVAL
2
3
4
5
6
-.0538 (
-.1879 (
-.2025 (
-.U%d (
.0768 (
-.4466
-.5805
-.t994
-.5005
-.3274
.3389)
.2046)
.1943)
.3069)
.4809)
.0\53 (
.0483 (
.0470 (
.OJHO (
-.0020 (
-.0700
-.0372
-.0400
-.0497
-.0901
.1006)
.1338)
. 1 34 1 )
-125H)
.llrtbll)
NOTE: IF ZERO IS CONTAINED WITHIN A GIVEN CONFIDENCE INTERVAL THEN THERE IS NO STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE UETWEIN
DISTILLED HATER AND THE CORRESPONDING WASTE WATLR FOR Till ASSOCIATED PARAMtTLR( INTEl'CEPT/SLOPE).
THE SLOPE AND INTERCEPT ESTIMATES FROM THIS ANALYSIS AHE NOT THE SAME AS THOSE UtUAINEI) FROM THE PRECISION
AND ACCORACY REGRESSIONS PERFORMED EARLIER.
-------
TABLE 84. EFFECT OF WATER TYPE ON DIBROMOCHLOROMETHANE ANALYSIS
** POINT ESTIMATES **
01STILLEJ HATEH SLOPE:GAMMA(1) = .94567
WATER INTEHCEPT(WATtR-OlSTlLLEO) SLOP£(WATEH-D1ST ILLf.O)
2
3
4
5
6
.11)96
-.2468
-.2439
-.0931
.2142
-.0133
.0423
.04H3
.UM4
-.0336
to
U)
SOURCE
** ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE **
Of SUM OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARE
HEG(DISTILLED) 1 1353.o2416 1353.62416
REG(WATER/UISTILLEU) 10 2.59815 .25981
ERROR 553 92.11652 .16658
TOTAL
564 1448.33883
f PR OB
1.56 .1151
TABLE OF 95% CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INTERCEPTS WO THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SLOPES *•
WATER
INTERCEPT(WATER-DISTILLED)
ESTIMATE INTERVAL
SLOPE(WATER-DIiTILLED)
ESTIMATE INTERVAL
2
3
4
5
6
.1096 (
-.2468
-.2439 (
-.0931 (
.2142 (
-.3643 ,
-.7213 ,
-.7185 ,
-.5601 .
-.2538 ,
.5835)
.2277
.2307)
.3739)
.682!)
-.0133 (
.0423
.0483 (
.01H4 (
-.0336 (
-.1163
-.06)0
-.U562
-.0834
-.1357
.0897)
.1457)
.1529)
.1201)
.0686)
NOTE: IF ZERO IS CONTAINED WITHIN A GIVEN CONFIDENCE INTERVAL THEN THERE IS NO STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE BETWEEN
DISTILLED HATER AND THE CORRESPONDING WASTE HATEH FOR THE ASSOCIATED 1>AHAMETE«( INTERCEPT/SLOPE).
THE SLOPE AND INTCRCEPT ESTIMATES FROM THIS ANALYSIS ARE NOT THE SAME AS THOSE OBTAINED FKOM THE PRECISION
AND ACCURACY REGRESSIONS PERFORMED EARLIER.
-------
TABLE 85. EFFECT OF WATER TYPE ON TETRACHLOROETHENE ANALYSIS
** POINT ESTIMATES **
DISTILLED WATER SLOPE:GAMMA(1) - 1.00553
WATEK INTERCEPT(WATER-013T1LLED) SLOPE(WATER-DISTILLED)
.1830
.U142
-.3278
.0844
.2864
-.0330
.0014
.0342
-.0141
-.0460
U)
SOURCE
** ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE **
OF SOM OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARE
HEG(DISTILLEU) 1 1572.52747 1572.62747
H£G(WATE«/D1ST1LLED) 10 4.34955 .43496
ERHOR 608 77.11310 .12683
TOTAL
619 1653.99012
PROS
3.43 .0002
** TABLE OF 95% CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INTERCEPTS AND THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SLOPES
MATER
INTERCEPT(WATER-DISTILLED)
ESTIMATE INTERVAL
SLOPE(WATER-OISTILLED)
ESTIMATE INTERVAL
?
3
4
5
6
.1830 (
.0142 (
-.3278 (
.01(44 (
.2854 (
-.2055 ,
-.3661 .
-.7/13 .
-.29'H ,
-.1051) ,
.5715)
.3446)
.1156)
.4678)
.b758)
-.0330 (
.0019 (
.0342 (
-.0141 (
-.04hO (
-.1170
-.OHU6
-.0591
-.0973
-.ni7
.0510)
.UH44)
.l?7S)
.llt.'M)
-U391)
NOTE: IF ZEWU IS CONTAINED WITHIN A GIVEN CONFIDENCE INTERVAL THEN THERE IS NO STATISTICAL SlGNirICANCE BETWflN
DISTILLED WATER AND THE CORRESPONDING WASTE WATER FOR THE ASSOCIATED PAwAMtTEK(INTEHCtFt/SLUPL).
THE SLOPE AND INTERCEPT ESTIMATES FROM THIS ANALYSIS ARE NOT THE SAME AS THOSE OBTAINED FRO* THE PRECISION
AND ACCURACY REGRESSIONS PERFORMED EARLIER.
-------
TABLE 86. EFFECT OF WATER TYPE ON 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE ANALYSIS
** POINT ESTIMATES **
DISTILLED WATEK SLOPE:GAMMAf1) - 1.016/1
HATEH INTEHCEPT(WATEH-DISTILLED) SLOPE(WATEH-DISTILLEO)
2
3
4
5
6
.1436
.03Hb
-.4149
-.10//
-.2U6/
-.0269
-.0186
.U64H
.0156
.0360
K)
CO
cn
SOURCE
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE **
OF SUM OF SQUARES MEAN SQOARE
REG(OISTILLEO) 1 1382. (16309 1382.06304
REG(WATER/DIS7ILLED) 10 2.65/98 .265HO
ERROR 513 72.6^084 .141/U
PROS
1.88 .0461
TOTAL
524 1457.41191
** TABLE OF 95%-CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INTERCEPTS AND THE DIFFERENCES tftTWEEN SLOPES *•
WATER
INTERCEPT!WATER-01 STILLED)
ESTIMATE INTERVAL
1436 (
03H5 (
414y (
HJ77 (
i^O'W (
-.3028 ,
-.415h ,
-.8690 ,
-.5604 .
-.6/00 .
.5900)
.492')
.0392)
.3450)
.2566)
SLOPE(WATER-DlSmiED)
ESTIMATE INHKVAL
•.Ol'lh ( -.HfiH , .(tJ-ff;)
.Oh4H ( -.033J , .Ihjil)
.1131)
.11156 ( -.0820 .
.0360 ( -.OtrJl ,
NOTE: IF /FRO IS CONTAINED WITHIN A GIVEN CONFIDENCE INTERVAL THEN THERE IS NO STATISTICAL SK.NIt ICANCE BETWEEN
DISTILLED WATER AND THE CORKl SPONIJING WASTE WATER KOH THE ASSOCIATED PAHAMtUK( INTEKUPT/iLOPL ).
THE SLOPE AND INTERCEPT ESTIMATES FROM THIS ANALYSIS ARE NOT THE SAME AS THOSE OBTAINED Fh'OM THE PRECISION
AND ACCURACY REGRESSIONS PERFORMED EARLIER.
-------
TABLE 87. EFFECT OF WATER TYPE ON BROMOMETHANE ANALYSIS
** POINT ESTIMATES •*
DISTILLED WATER SLOPE:GAMMA(1) = 1.14667
WATER INTERCEPT(UATER-OISTILLED) SlUPE(WATEK-UlSTILUl))
2
3
4
b
6
-.U117
-.114?
.23/1
.1H3U
.0365
.052H
-.UJb6
-.00^5
-.0546
U>
SOURCE
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE **
OF SUM OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARE
REG(OJSTILLEO) 1 1933.28671 1933.28671
REG(WATEH/DISTILLED) 10 3.40849 .34083
ERROR 540 208.53868 .38618
PROS
.P.8 .5493
TOTAL
551 2145.23388
** TABLE Of 951 CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR THE DII-FEKENCES BETWEEN INTERCEPTS AND THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SLOPES •'
WATER
INTERCEPT(WATER-OISTILLED)
ESTIMATE INTERVAL
SLOPE(WATER-OISTILLED)
ESTIMATE INTERVAL
2
3
4
5
6
.0117 ( -.7146 . .6913)
.1142 -.8088 , .5HD4)
.2371 ( -.4662 , .9404)
.1830 ( -.5443 . .9103)
.3129 ( -.4273 . 1.0530)
0365 (
05?8 (
1)356 (
U095 (
0546 (
-.1166
-.0994
-.1911
-.1693
-.2172
.1897)
.2049)
.1200)
.1504)
.1080)
NOTE: IF ZERO IS CONTAINED WITHIN A GIVEN CONFIDENCE INTERVAL THEN THEME IS NO STATISTICAL SIliNiF ICANCE BETWEEN
OISTILLEU WATER AND THE CORRESPONDING WASTE WATER FOR THE ASSOCIATED PAKAMF UK( INFl HCLPT/SLO^'t ).
THE SLOPE AND INTERCEPT ESTIMATES FROM THIS ANALYSIS ARE NOT THE SAME AS THOSE OUTAINEO FHOM THE PRECISION
AND ACCURACY HEGMESSIONS PERFORMED EARLIER.
-------
TABLE 88. EFFECT OF WATER TYPE ON CHLOROETHANE ANALYSIS
" POINT ESTIMATES **
DISTILLED HATER SLOPE:GAMMA(1) = 1.06383
HATER INTERCEPT(WAIEH-DISTILLEO) SLOPE(WATEH-DISTILLEO)
.0044
• - - .0295
.10/0
.lb6H
-.0432
.0293
-.0271
.0178
.0043
to
u>
-J
** ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE **
SOURCE OF SUM OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARE
1633.6^,009
REG(DISTILLED)
REGJHATER/OISTILLEU)
ERROR
TOTAL
1 1633.6^,009 1633.65009
10 .65447 .06b4b
529 37.29273 .0/050
b40 1671.b9729
• PR08
.93 .5064
** TABLE OF 951 CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INTERCEPTS ANO THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SLOPES •*
WATER
INTERCEPT(UATER-OISTILLED)
ESTIMATE INTERVAL
SLOPE(WATER-OISTILLFD)
ESTIMATE INTERVAL
2
3
4
5
6
.0295 (
.1070 (
.IbbH {
-.0432 (
.02V3 (
-.2708 .
-.1833 ,
-.1341 .
-.3400 .
-.2629 ,
.3298)
.3973)
.46/H)
.2b3b)
.3216)
.0044 (
-.0048 (
-.02M (
.0178 (
.0043 (
-.0641 ,
-.0710 .
-.U4fV ,
-.OM13 .
-.0623 .
.0730)
.0614)
.0420)
.OHb^j
.070^)
NOTE: IF LtM IS CONTAINED WITHIN A UIVEN CONFIDENCE 1NTLHVAL THEN THERE IS NO STAtlStlCAL SI&NIFICftNCE BEIWEtN
OISTILLLI) WA1EH AND THE CORRESPONDING WASTE WATER FOR THE ASSOCIATED PARAMETER; IN1ERCEPT/SLUPL ).
THE SLOPE AND INTERCEPT ESTIMATES FROM THIS ANALYSIS ARE NOT THE SAME AS THOSE OBTAINED FKIX tut PRECISION
AND ACCURACY REGRESSIONS PERFORMED EARLIER.
-------
TABLE 89. EFFECT OF WATER TYPE ON 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE ANALYSIS
*» POINT ESTIMATES **
DISTILLED WATER SLOPE:GAMMA(1) • .99100
WATER INTERCEPT(WATER-OISTILLED) SLO#fi WATER-DISTILLED)
-.0115
.0381
.0987
-.1316
-.0048
.0074
-.0006
-.1)292
.0375
.0141
NJ
CJ
00
SOURCE
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE **
OF SUM OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARE
KEG(OISTILLEC) 1 1558.48244 1558.48244
REli(WATER/01STILLED) 10 .89287 .08929
ERROR 573 78.41573 .13685
TOTAL
584 1637.79104
PR 08
.65 .7687
** TAULE Of 95* CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INTERCEPTS AND THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SLOPES ••
!NT£RCEPT(WATER-DISTILLED) SLOPE(HATER-DISTILLED)
HATER ESTIMATE INTERVAL ESTIMATE INTERVAL
.0946)
2
3
4
5
6
-.0115 (
.0381 (
.0987 (
-.1316 (
-.0048 (
-.3919
-.3417
-.2867
-.5153
-.4125
.3688)
.4180)
.4H42 )
.2b?l)
.4U2J})
.0074
-.0006
-.02V2
.037b
.014)
( -.0799 ,
( -.0876 .
( -.11H2 .
( -.ObOb
( -.0800 ,
.10H2)
NOTE: IF ZERO IS CONTAINED WITHIN A lilVEN CONFIDENCE INTERVAL THEN THERE IS NO STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE BETWEEN
DISTILLED WATER ANU THE CORRESPONDING WASTE WATER FOR THE ASSOCIATED PAKAMETER(INTERCEPT/SLOPE).
THE SLOPE AND INTERCEPT ESTIMATES FROM THIS ANALYSIS ARE NOT THE SAME AS THOSE OBTAINED FROM THE PRECISION
AND ACCURACY REGRESSIONS PERFORMED EARLIER.
-------
TABLE 90. EFFECT OF WATER TYPE ON CHLOROFORM ANALYSIS
** POINT ESTIMATES •*
DISTILLED WATER SLOPE :GAMMA( 1) « .99445
HATER INTEHCEPT(WATER-DISTILLEO) SLOPE(WATEH-OISTILLEO)
2
3
4
5
6
.1720
.1004
.0243
-.0297
-.1448
-.0237
-.0145
-.UU75
.0103
.0326
W
vD
SOURCE
** ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE **
DF SUM OF SQUARES MEAN S'JUARE
REG(OISTILLED) 1 1655.54096 1655.S4Q96
REG(WATER/UlSTILLED) 10 1.08846 .10885
ERROR 627 55.12/09 .08/92
PH03
1.24 .2631
TOTAL
638 1711.75651
** TABLE OF 951 CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FUR THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INTERCEPTS ANU THE QOFERENCES BETWEEN SLOPES,
WATER
INTERCEPT (WATER -DISTILLED)
ESTIMATE INTERVAL
SLOPE (WATER-li 1ST! LI EO)
ESMMATE INTERVAL
2
3
4
5
6
.1720 (
.1064 (
.0243 (
-.0297 (
-.1448 (
-.1333 .
-.18c>4 ,
-.2725 ,
-.3213 .
-.4bB4 ,
.47/3)
.4nl3)
.32 I/)
./'hi 4)
.17U8)
-.0237 (
-.0115 (
-.0075 (
.0103 (
.U32b (
-.O'-MO ,
-.OK 2 2 ,
-.()•' 54 ,
-.lib*/
-.0407 ,
.0466)
.0531)
.UM)5)
.am)
. lOb-0
NOTE: IF /ERO IS CONTAINED WITHIN A GIVEN CONFIDENCE INTERVAL 1HEN THERE IS NO STATISTICAL SlONIKK'ANCE HEIWEEN
DISTILLED WATER ANO THE CORRESPONDING WASTE WATER FOR THE ASSOCIATED PAKAMLTER(INTERCLPT/SlORE ).
THE SLOPE AND INTERCEPT ESTIMATES 'ROM THIS ANALYSIS ARE NOT THE SAME AS THOSE OBTAINED FROM THE 1'REClb.tUN
AND ACCURACY REGRESSIONS PERFORMED EARLIER.
-------
TABLE 91. EFFECT OF WATER TYPE ON CARBON TETRACHLORIDE ANALYSIS
** POINT tSTlMATtS **
DISTILLED HATER SLOPE:GAMMA(1) = 1.0287H
WATEH INTERCEPT(WATER-DISTILLED) SLOPE(WATER-Ui$TILLEO)
-.2940
.1178
-.3602
-.0605
-.2611
.0610
-.Ol9t>
.0585
,0116
.0578
N)
4*
O
SOURCE
** ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE **
Gf SUM OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARE
REG(OISTILLED) 1 1842.9H572 1842.98572
HEG(WATER/DISTILLEO) 10 3.09999 .31000
ERROR 614 58.49217 .09526
PR 08
3.25 .0004
TOTAL
625 1904.57789
TABLE OF 951 CCKHOENCE INTERVALS FOR THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INTERCEPTS AND THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SLOPES
WATER
INTERCEPT(WATER-DISTILLED)
ESTIMATE INTERVAL
SLOPE(WATEH-UISTILLEO)
ESTIMATE INTERVAL
2
3
4
b
6
-.2940
.1178
-.3602
-.0605
-.2611
( -.6060 ,
( -.2068 ,
( -.6825 ,
( -.3776 .
( -.5803 ,
.01H1)
.4425)
-.0378)
.2565)
.U5H1)
.0610 (
-.0196 (
.U5»b (
.0116 (
.0578 (
-.0106
-.0934
-.0149
-.Obll
-.0154
.1327)
.0542)
.1320)
,UH«,')
.1310)
NOTE: IF ZERO IS CONTAINED WITHIN A GIVEN CONFIDENCE INTERVAL THEN THERE IS NO STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE BETWEEN
DISTILLED WATER AND THE CORRESPONDING WASTE WATER KOK THE ASSOCIATED PARAMETER!INTtRCEPT/SLOHt).
THE SLOPE AND INTERCEPT ESTIMATES FROM THIS ANALYSIS ARE NOT THE SAME AS THOSE OUTA1NEO FROM THE PRECISION
AND ACCURACY REGRESSIONS PERFORMED EARLIER.
-------
TABLE 92. EFFECT OF WATER TYPE ON TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ANALYSIS
** POINT ESTIMATES ••
U1STILLEO WATER SLOPE:GAMMA(1) = 1.01654
WATER INTERCEPT(WATER-OISTILLEO) SLOPE(WAiER-DISTILLEO)
2 -.0032 -.1)003
3 .3014 -.0473
4 -.6017 .0451
5 .0520 .0127
6 .1252 ..0293
** ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE **
SOURCE OF SUM OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARE F PHQ8
REDISTILLED) 1 1366.37811 1366.37811
HEli(WATEH/DISTILLEU) 10 12.38472 1.2384/ 3.16 .0006
ERROR 518 202.96658 .39183
TOTAL 529 1581.72942
•* TABLE OF 951 CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR THE UIFFEKENCES BETWEEN INTERCEPTS AND THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SLOPES ••
INTEHCEPT(HATER-OISTILLED) SLOPE (WATEP-DISTILIED)
WATER ESTIMATE INTERVAL ESTIMAIE INTERVAL
2 -.0032 ( -.7245 . .7181) -.1)003 ( -.1586 . .15HO)
3 .3014 ( -.4136 . 1.0164) -.04/3 ( -.2040 . .1093)
4 -.6017 ( -1.5334 . .3301) .0451 ( -.M4b . .i'MM
5 .0520 ( -.6728 , .7/67) .0127 ( -.I4b2 . .I71b)
6 .1252 ( -.b3Ub , .HH10) -.0243 ( -.1921 ,
NOTE: IF i!EXO IS CONTAINED WITHIN A lilVEN CONFIDENCE INTERVAL THEN THERE IS NO STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE BETWEEN
DISTILLED HATER AND THE CORRESPOND1NU WASTE HATER FOR THE ASSOCIATED PAHAMt Tt «( INTEKCEPT/SLOI'L (.
[HE SLOPE AND INTERCEPT ESTIMATES FROM THIS ANALYSIS AKE NOT THE SAME AS THOSE OBTAINED FKOM THE PRECISION
AND ACCURACY RECESSIONS PERFORMED EARLIER.
-------
TABLE 93. EFFECT OF WATER TYPE ON 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE ANALYSIS
*• POINT ESMMATFS •*
DISTILLED WATER SLOPE:GAMMA(1) ' 1.02381
WATER INTERCEPT(WATER-DISTILLED) SLOPE(WATER-OISTILLED)
2
3
4
b
6
.2H85
.17/0
-.1)9/5
.0432
.Ub05
-.0629
-.0334
.0055
-.0010
.0015
SOURCE
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE **
DF SUM OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARE
REG(DISTILLED) 1 1587.45499 1587.45
-------
TABLE 94. EFFECT OF WATER TYPE ON BROMOFORM ANALYSIS
*• POINT ESTIMAffS **
DISTILLED HATER SLOPE :C,ArW\( 1) = 1.14bf>8
SLOPi;(WATER-:»ISTlLLEU)
-.07b8
HATEK tNTEKCEPT(UATER-OlSTILLEU)
.4471
.4036
.1803
-.04?7
-.OJV
.4b67
LO
SOORCE
•• ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE **
OF SUM OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARE
REG(DISTILLED) 1 1H46.03473 1846.01473
KEG(HATER/01STILLEO) 10 3.100<>b .3lnii3
ERROR b91 10H.41bbl .18344
PH08
1.69
TOTAL
602
TABLE OF 9b% CONFIDENCE INTEHVALS FOK THE DIFFERENCES DETUEEN INTERCEPTS ANU THE OI^ERENCES BETyctN
SLOPE (WATEK-Dlsni LEU)
WATER
2
3
4
b
h
INTtHCLPT(UAIEH-niSTILLEO)
INftKVAL
.44/1 (
.41)36 ( ..ObH4 ,
( -.0174 ,
( -,^b44 ,
,4bb7 ( -.0183 ,
.H/bh)
-47K1)
- . 1H 34
-. 1&4II
-./01J
-.176H
.0314)
.11433)
.0316)
NOIL; IF /LHO Ib CDU1AIMLU WITHIN A lil VEN CONF lULMCt INTtHVAL HUN Till K[ [ •> NO SlAtlbTlrAL Mi.NUHAN'E
OISIILLE!) WATLK AHO THE COHKESPONU1 NO UAilE WAftK KM THE AbSOtMAfLU PAPAMM I H ( I Nl tHCH'1 / SI OPE ) .
THE SLOPE ANU INTERCEPT ESTIMATES FROM Tlllb ANALYSIS AKL NOT THE SAME AS THUM HHTAINED I KiW THE PRECISION
ANU ACCUK/'.C* HtWESSIUNS PEHFUHMEU EAKLiEK.
-------
TABLE 9b. EFFECT OF WATER TYPE ON CHLOROBENZHNE ANALYSIS
•* POINT ESTIMATE **
DISTILLED HATER SLOPE .GAHMA( 1) = 1.0bU3S
WATEK INTERCEPT(WAIER-DISTILLED) S LOPE (WATER-U IS T ILLED)
-.Ob 38
.2068
3.4U29
-.0835
.3t>54
.0055
-.044«
-. 7bl)b
.0012
-.UG32
NJ
SOURCE
*• ANALKS IS (jf VARIANCE **
OF SUM OF SQUARES MAN SQUARE f PROS
REG(DISTILLEO) 1 1342.2HOH1 1342.2HIJH1
REGfWATEK/DlSTILLED) 10 84.45342 8.44S34
ERROK 532 \lZ.tiOdhl .21203
. 19 .01)00
TOTAL
543 1544.53490
** TABLE OF 951 CONFIDENCE INTEHVALS FOK THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INTERCEPTS AND TH DlFFErtfNCfS BE TWEE N S LOFT S **
HATER
1NTEKCEPT(WATE«-U IS TILLED)
ESTIMATE INTERVAL
StUH (WATER-ObTllUO)
INTERVAL
2
3
4
b
b
-.11533 (
.20f>H |
3.41)29 (
-.!>«?!• (
.3554 (
-.3630 ,
-.3041 ,
3.3520 ,
-.5120 ,
-.202' ,
.4S54)
.71/8)
4.613/)
.4444)
.4135)
.DUbb (
-.04-18 (
-./hOb (,
.0012 (
-.Oh32 (
-.1057 ,
-. 15b3 ,
-.8425 ,
-.1140 ,
-.1817 .
.lib/)
.Obb?)
-.628o)
.1164)
.Ob53)
MOTE: IF ZEKO b COffTAUCD WITHIN A GIVEN CONFIDE Ni. INTERVAL THEN THfKC IS NO S TAT Is T ICAL -, ll.NIF iLftNCE H£Ti*KN
U1ST1LLEO WATER ANU T* COHHES PUNUING HAjiE UATcR VUR IKE ASSOCIATED I'AKAM TE K( I NU RU PI h L0t\ ).
THE SLOPE AKO IN1ERCEPT ESTIMATES FKOM THIS ANAL ft b ARE NUT THE SAME Ab THOSE UUTAINEU FROM THE PRECISION
AND ACCURACY REbRESS IONS PEHFURMED EARLIER.
-------
TABLE 96. EFFECT OF WATER TYPE ON 1,4-DiCHLOROBENZENE ANALYSIS
** POINT ESTIMATES **
DISTILLED WATER SLO'X :GAhMA( 1) * .92167
WATER INTERCEPT(WATER-DISTILLED) SLOPE (WATER-DISTILLED)
-.0380
.031)0
.0452
-.1361
-.3686
.0131
.0144
-.OU84
.0251
.0939
fvj
>^
en
SOURCE
** ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE **
DF SUM OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARE
REG(OISTILLEU) 1 1369.38906 1369.38906
REGJWATER/DIST1LLED) 10 2.69944 .26994
EKROR 595 79.41649 .13347
PR08
2.02 .0290
TUTAL
bU6 1451.b0499
** TABLE OF 95% CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INTERCEPTS AND THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN S
INTERCEPT (WATER-CIST I LIEU)
WATER ESTIMATE INTERVAL
S LOPE (WATER-0 IS TILLED)
ESTIMATE INTERVAL
0380 (
1)300 (
0452 (
1361 (
3586 (
-.4527 .
-.3840 ,
-.3695 ,
-.5470 ,
-.7b8/ ,
.3768)
.4.141)
.4599)
.2/4H)
.0516)
.01J1 (
.0144 (
-.0(1114 (
.0251 (
.0939 (
-.0770
-.0751
-.0984
-.0643
.0050
.1033)
.1039)
.0816)
.1145)
.1829)
NOIE: IF /CRO IS CONTAINED WITHIN A GIVEN CONFIDENCE INTERVAL THEN THERE IS NO S TA1 IS TICAL SIGNIFICANCE 8ETWELN
DISTILLED WATER AND THE CORRESPONDING WASTE WATER FOR THE ASSOCIATED PARAMt TER( I NTERCE PT/S LOPE ).
THE SLOPE AND INTERCEPT ESTIMATES FROM THIS ANALYSIS ARE NOT THE SAME AS THCbE OBTAINED FROM THE PRECISION
AND ACCURACY REGRESSIONS PERFORMED EARLIER.
-------
TABLE 97. EFFECT OF WATER TYPE ON METHYLENE CHLORIDE ANALYSIS
** POINT ESTIMATES •*
DISTILLED WATER SLOPE:GAMMA(1) * 1.05426
HATER INTERCEPT(WATER-DISTILLED) SLOPE(WATER-DIST.ILLED)
-.2520
-.1809
-.0200
.2355
.1601
.0522
.0497
.0141
-.0384
-.0244
N)
SOURCE
** ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE **
Of SUM OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARE
REG(OISTILLED) 1 1733.23569 1733.23569
REG(WATER/D1STILLED) 10 2.83985 .28398
ERROR 585 75.37595 .12885
PR08
2.20 .0163
TOTAL
596 1811.45149
** TMJLE OF 95% CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INTERCEPTS ANO THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SLOPES ••
WATER
INTERCEPT(WATER-OISTILLEU)
ESTIMATE INTERVAL
SLUPE(WATER-OISTILLEO)
ESTIMATE INTERVAL
-.2520 ( -.63/8 .
-.1009 ( -.5792 .
-.0200 ( -.4072 ,
.2355 ( -.1481 ,
.IbOl ( -.2255 ,
.U3H)
.217b)
.3672)
.6191)
.5457)
.0522 f
.04y; (
.0141 (
-.0384 (
-.1)244 (
-.0355 .
-.OJ18 .
-.0713 ,
-.12(5 ,
-.llil ,
.1399)
.1411)
.1025)
.0497)
,0h35)
NOTE: IF ZERO IS CONTAINED WITHIN A GIVEN CONFIOF.NCE INTERVAL THEN THERE IS NO STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE HETWEEN
OIST1LLEO HATER AND THE CORRESPONDING WASTE WAT1R FOR THE ASSOCIATED I'AKAMETER( INTERCEPT/SLOPE).
THE SLOPE ANU INTERCEPT ESTIMATES FROM THIS ANALYSIS ARE NOT THE SAME AS THOSE OHIAINEO FROM THE PRECISION
AND ACCURACY REGRESSIONS PERFORMED EARLIER.
-------
TABLE 98. EFFECT OF WATER TYPE ON 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE ANALYSIS
** POINT ESTIMATES **
DISTILLED WATER SLOPE:GAMMA(1) = 1.052/2
WATER INTERCEPT(WATER-DISTILLED) SLOPE(WATER-DISTILLEO)
-.2240
-.0738
.0118
.1334
.1517
.0349
.0155
-.0011
-.0247
-.0284
to
SOURCE
** ANAI YSIS OF VARIANCE *•
OF SUM OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARE
REG(DISTILLED)
REG(WATER/D1STILLED)
ERROR
TOTAL
1
10
616
1813.70310
1.76091
47.52303
1813.70310
.17609
.0771S
6?7 1862.98703
PKOB
2.28 .0125
TABLE OF 95% CONFIQENCE INTERVALS FOR THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INTERCEPTS AND THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SLOPES
WATER
INTERCEPT(WATER-DISTILLED)
ESTIMATE INTERVAL
SLOPE(HATER-DISTILLEU)
ESTIMATE INTERVAL
2
3
4
5
6
-.2240 (
-.0/38 (
.U118 (
.1334 (
.1517 (
-.5122 ,
-.3555 ,
-.2786 ,
-.1578 .
-.13(>1 ,
.0643)
.2080)
.3021)
.4/16)
.4395)
.0349 (
.11155 (
-.0011 (
-.024? (
-.0?84 (
-.0314 ,
-.11494 ,
-.Od/h .
-.0914 ,
-.0947 .
.101?)
.081)5)
.Ct>55)
.04?!)
.U379)
NOTE: IF ZERO IS CONTAINED WITHIN A GIVEN CONFIDENCE INTERVAL THEN THERE IS NO STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE BETWEEN
DISTILLED WATER AND THE CORRESPONDING WASTE WftTER FOK IHL ASSOCIATED PAKAMLUR(INTERCEPT/SLOPE).
THE SLOPE AND INTERCEPT ESTIMATES FROM THIS ANALYSIS ARE NOT THE SAME AS THOSE OBTAINED FHOM THE PRECISION
AND ACCURACY REGRESSIONS PERFORMED EARLIER.
-------
TABLE 99. EFFECT OF WATER TYPE ON 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE ANALYSIS
** POINT ESI1MATES *•
DISTILLED WATER SLOPE:GAMMA(1) * 1.01408
WATER INTERCEPT(WATER-OISTIUEO) SLOPE(WATER-UISTILLEO)
-.0407
-.2102
.4150
.U564
1.9431
.UU35
.0327
-.1046
-.U306
-.4340
NJ
•f>
GO
SOURCE
** ANALYSIS Of VARIANCE **
OF SUM OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARE
ReG(OISTlLLEO) 1 1331.91142 1331.91142
REG(WATER/DIST1LLEO) 10 31.30708 3.13071
ERROR 542 177.65199 .32777
TOTAL
5u3 1540.87049
PROS
9.55 .0000
** TABLE OF 951 CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INTERCEPTS AND THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SLOPES
WATER
1NTERCEPT(WATE«-0!STILLEO)
ESTIMATE INTERVAL
SLOPE(WATER-OISTILLEO)
ESTIMATE INTERVAL
0035 (
0327 (
1046 (
0306 (
434(1 (
-.1398
-.1068
-.2502
-.1733
-.590J
.1467)
.1721)
.0409)
.1120)
-.2778)
2 -.0407 ( -.6664 , .5HSO)
3- -.2102 ( -.B150 , .J'Mb)
4 .4150 ( -.2293 , 1.0'iS4)
5 .0564 ( -.5650 , .6/78)
6 1.9431 ( 1.2U8 , 2.0724)
NOTE: IF ZFRO IS CONTAINED WITHIN A GIVEN CONFIDENCE INTtHVAL THEN THUE IS NO STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE BETWEEN
UIST1LLED HATER AND THE CORRESPONDING WASTE WATER FOR THE ASSOCIAltD PARAMl IEN( INUHCIPT/SLOPE).
THE SLOPE AND INTERCEPT ESTIMATES FHOM THIS ANALYSIS A«E NOT THE bA^E AS THOSE OBTAIW.O FROM THE PRECISION
AND ACCURACY REGRESSIONS PERFORMED EARLIER. x
-------
TABLE 100. EFFECT OF WATKR TYPE ON BROMOD1CHLOROMETHANE ANALYSIS
•• POINT ESMMAUS ••
DISTILLED WATfH SLOPf :GAMMA( 1 ) . 1.0031;
WATER INTEHCEPT(WATER-OISTILLED) SLOPE(WATER-OISTILLED)
2 .1246 -.0283
3 -.121)1 .0209
4 -.0093 -.0006
5 .00?; -.009H
6 .UbSS -.0213
*• ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE **
SOURCE DF SUM OF SQUARES MEAN SiJUARE F PR OB
REG(OISTILLEO) 1 1497. 49639 1497.49b34
REG(WAIER/OISTILLEU) 10 .54275 .05427 .49 .8956
ERROR 565 62.32876 .11032
TOTA\ 576 1560.36/89
TABLE OF 951 CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INIfRCEPTS ANO THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SLOPES ••
.1NTEHCEPT(WATE«-OI STILLED) SLOPE ( WATER -01 STILLED)
WATER ESTIMATE INIERVAL ESTIMATE
2 .1246 ( -.2449 . .4991) -.U.^3 ( . . n 3U . .0564)
3 -.1201 ( -.4U21 , .2411!) .02iN ( ..0616 . .1033)
4 -.;)U43 ( -.3hHl , .34^b) -.OUHh ( -.OH2b , .UH15)
5 .1)027 ( -.3b4H , .J702) •-.inwn ( -.0136 . .(lMn\
6 .(!lj54 ( -.2923 , .4242) -.U213 (
NOTE: IF ZERO IS CONTAINED WITHIN A GIVEN CONFIDENCE INTERVAL THEN THERE IS NO STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE BETWEEN
DISTILLED HAHK AND THE CORRESPONDING WASTE WAHR FOR THE ASSOCIATED VAHWU IEH( INTERCEPT/SLOPE ) .
THE SLOPE AND INTERCEPT ESTIMATES FROM THIS ANALYSIS AKE NOT THE SAME AS THUS*. OBTAINED FHOM THE DECISION
AND ACCURACY REGRESSIONS PERFORMED EARLIER.
-------
TABLE 101. EFFECT OF WATER TYPE ON 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE ANALYSIS
** POINT EST1MA1ES **
DISTILLED WATER SLOPE:GAMMA(1) « 1.039U
HATER INTERCEPT(WATER-OISTULEO) SLOPE(rfATER-UlSTlLLEU)
.3328
.0305
.0279
-.1719
.0776
-.0667
.0012
-.0130
.0421
-.0095
cn
o
SOURCE
** ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE **
DF SUM OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARE
REG(DISTILLED)
REG(WATER/D1ST1LLED)
ERROR
TOTAL
1
10
472
1339.85997
1.67214
93.31996
1339.85997
.16/21
.19771
483 1434.86207
PR 08
.85 .5846
** TABLE OF 951 CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOK THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INTERCEPTS AND THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SLOPtS ••
MATER
:NTEHCEPT324)
.3620)
.h4b9)
-.Ubb7 (
.0(112 (
-.OUU (
.O')?l (
-.0095 (
-.1861
-.1183
-.1399
-.0740
-.1320
.0527)
.1207)
.lUrt)
.1581)
.1130)
NOTE: If /.EHO IS CONTAINED WITHIN A GIVEN CONflDLNCL INUKVA1. HUN till «f. IS NO SfATISMrM SIGNIHLANCE liETWILM
DISTILLED WATER ANU THE CORRESPONDING WASTt WATIH FOR THE ASSUI.IAIED PARAMt FLR( I NTt KCI -PT/SLOV'E ).
THE SLOPE AND INTERCEPT ESTIMATES FROM THIS ANALYSIS ARE NOT THE SAME AS THOSE OBTAINED FKOM THL PRECISION
AND ACCURACY REGRESSIONS PERFORMED EARLIER.
-------
TABLE ]">. EFFECT OF WATER TYPE ON C/S-i,3-DICHLOROPROPENE ANALYSIS
** POINT ESTIMATES **
DISTILLED WATER SLOPE:GAMMA(1) > 1.04151
WATER INTERCEPT(WATER-DISTILLED) SLOPE(HATER-DISTILLED)
2 -.2285 .0472
3 .1267 -.0365
4 -.1608 .0265
5 .1602 -.0573
6 .3193 -.0715
** ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE ••
SOURCE OF SUM OF SQUARES MEAN SQUARE f PR08
REG(DISTRLED) 1 1291.31341 1294.31341
REG(WATER/DISTILLED) 10 2.71965 .27197 1.77 .0626
ERROR 486 74.48584 .16326
TOTAL 497 1371.51890
** TABcE OF 95% CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INTfKCEPTS AND THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SLOPES
INTERCEPT(WATER-OISTILLED) SLOPEfWATER-DISTILLED)
WATER ESTIMATE INTERVAL ESTIMATE INftHVAL
2 -.2285 ( -.7379 , .2809) .0472 ( -.DM? , .1566)
3 .126? ( -.3485 , .fiU'fl) -.0365 ( -.1400 , .Uf>69)
4 -.1608 ( -.6749 . .3533) .11^65 ( -.UH27 . .1358)
b .1602 ( -.32db , .h4ft^) -.11573 ( -.1635 . .0490)
6 .3193 ( -.1H51 , .823H) -.0/15 ( -.1805 , .0375)
NOTE: IF 2l.HO IS CONTAINED WITHIN A GIVEN CONFIDENCE INTERVAL THEN THEME IS NO STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE BETWEEN
OISTILLEO WATER AND THE CORRESPONDING WASTE WATEK FUW THE ASSOtlATEU PAHAMt\l*(INTERCEPT/SLOPE).
THE SLOPE AND INTERCEPT ESTIMATES FROM THIS ANALYSIS AKE NOT THE SAME AS THOSE OBTAINEO F«OM THE DECISION
AND ACCURACY REGRESSIONS PERFORMED EARLIER.
-------
TABLE 103. EFFECT OF WATER TYPE ON 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE ANALYSIS
"* POINT ESTIMATES **
DISTILLED WATER SLOPE:GArtMA(1) = 1.03221
WATER INTEXCEPTfWATER-OISTILLEU) SLOPE(WATER-OISTILLED)
-.1630
-.0028
.0633
-.0426
.16b3
.0249
.0013
-.0<'66
-.U044
SOURCE
** ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE •*
Uf SUM Of SQUASES MEAN SQUARE
REG(DISTILLED) 1 1548.39t'H9 1548.39889
REG(WATER/DISTILLEO) 10 1.62606 .16261
ERROR S70 93.294b2 .16367
PR OB
.99 .4477
TOTAL
b81 1643.31947
TABLE Of 95% CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INTERCEPTS Alii) THE DIFFERENCES 6ETJEEN SLOPES
HATER
INTEHCEPT(WAT£R-OISTILLEO)
ESTIMATE INTERVAL
SLOPE(WATEK-CISTILLEO)
ESTIMATE INTERVAL
I
3
4
5
6
-.1630 (
-.002H (
.0633 (
-.0426 (
.1653 (
-.6426 ,
-.4683 ,
-.4364 ,
-.bom .
-.2886 .
.316?)
.4627)
.M)31)
.4229)
.6192)
.0249 (
.0013 (
-.0266 (
-.0044 ,
-.0242 (
-.0789
-.0992
-.1323
-.1049
-.1225
.1?K7)
.1018)
.0791)
.09M)
.0740)
NOTE: IF ZEHO IS CONTAINED WITHIN A GIVEN CONFIDENCE INTERVAL THEN THEHL IS NO STATISTICAL SIGNIV" ICWE BETWEEN
DISTILLED WATER AND THE CORRESPONDING WASTE WATER FOR THE ASSOCIATED PARAMETER! INIERCEPT/SUH'f ).
THE SLOPE ANO INTERCEPT ESTIMATES FROM THIS ANALYSIS ARE NOT THE SAME Aj THOSE OHTAINEO FROM THE
AND ACCURACY REGRESSIONS PERFORMED EARLIER.
-------
TABLE 104. EFFECT OF WATER TYPE ON 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE ANALYSIS
** PUiNT ESTIMATES **
DISTILLED HATER SLOPE:GAMMA(1) = 1.01538
WATER INTERCEPT(WATER-OISTILLEO) SLOPL(WATER-OISTILLED)
2
3
4
5
6
-.0797
.0323
-.1404
-.1867
-.2133
.0077
-.0003
.0238
.0302
.0344
K>
SOURCE
** ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE **
DF SUM OF SO.OARES MEAN SQUARE
REG(DISTILLED) 1 1596.89114 1596.89114
HEG(WAT£R/D1STILLED) 10 1.00089 .10009
ERROR 592 61./4U74 .10429
PKOB
.96 .4777
TOTAL
£03 1553.63277
TABLE OF 95% CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INTERCEPTS AND THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SLOPES **
WATER
INTERCEPT(HATER-D1STILLED)
ESTIMATE INTERVAL
SLOPE(WATER-DISTILLED)
ESTIMATE INTERVAL
2
3
4
5
b
-.0797 (
.0323 (
-.1404 (
-.IHb? (
-.2133 (
-.4524 ,
-.3336 .
-.5143 ,
-.5510 .
-.5799 ,
.2930)
.3982)
.?336)
.17/7)
.1534)
.0077 (
-.uno3 (
.0238 (
.030? (
.0344 (
-.0727 ,
-.0792
-.0563 ,
-.04*8 ,
-.O'!4y ,
.0881)
.0786)
,10j4)
.100.1)
.1137)
NOTE: IF ZERO IS CONTAINED WITHIN A GIVEN CONFIDENCE INTIRVAL THEN IllluE IS NO SIAIISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE I'ETWEEN
DISTILLED WATER AND THE CORRESPONUING WASTE WATLR KM THE ASSOCIATED PARAMETER(INTERCEPT/SLOPE).
THE SLOPE AND INTERCEPT ESTIMATES FROM THIS ANALYSIS ARE NOT THL SAME AS THUSL OBTAINED FHOM THL PRECISION
AND ACCURACY REGRESSIONS PERFORMED EARLIER.
-------
-------
•a
o>
0 fc % oJ
£ v v >,
K
2"S S
(A
6- fc£
2^?fe
u
O< ^2 C &
0 &S u
*
G
Reproduced by NTIS
National Technical Information Service
U.S. Department of Commerce
Springfield, VA 22161
This report was printed specifically for your
order from our collection of more than 2 million
technical reports.
For economy and efficiency, NTIS does not maintain stock of its vast
collection of technical reports. Rather, most documents are printed for
each order. Your copy is the best possible reproduction available from
our master archive. If you have any questions concerning this document
or any order you placed with NTIS, please call our Customer Services
Department at (703)487-4660.
Always think of NTIS when you want:
• Access to the technical, scientific, and engineering results generated
by the ongoing multibillion dollar R&D program of the U.S. Government.
• R&D results from Japan, West Germany, Great Britain, and some 20
other countries, most of it reported in English.
NTIS also operates two centers that can provide you with valuable
information:
• The Federal Computer Products Center - offers software and
datafiles produced by Federal agencies.
• The Center for the Utilization of Federal Technology - gives you
access to the best of Federal technologies and laboratory resources.
For more information about NTIS, send for our FREE NTIS Products
and Services Catalog which describes how you can access this U.S. and
foreign Government technology. Call (703)487-4650 or send this
sheet to NTIS, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161.
Ask for catalog, PR-827.
Name _
Address.
Telephone
- Your Source to U.S. and Foreign Government
Research and Technology.
------- |