-------
                                  DISCLAIMER

    This report  Is  an external draft  for  review purposes only  and  does  not
constitute  Agency  policy.   Mention of  trade  names  or  commercial  products
does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                      11

-------

-------
                              EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    TMchloropropanes  are colorless liquids at  room  temperature  and  have an
odor  typical  of  chlorinated  hydrocarbons  (Williams,  1949).    They  are
sparingly soluble  1n  water  (see Table 1-2).  When  heated  to decomposition,
trlchloropropanes emit toxic  chlorine  fumes  (Sax,  1984).  The U.S  EPA TSCA
Production File  (U.S. EPA,  1977)  reported that one  manufacturer  produced
1,1,2- and 1,2,2-tMchloropropane and  four manufacturers produced l,2,3-tr1-
chloropropane  during  1977;  however,   this source  contained  no production
Information on  1,1 ,l-tr1chloropropane or  a  tMchloropropane  mixture.  SRI
(1986) cites  Dow Chemical U.S.A.  In Freeport,  TX,  and Shell  011  Co. In Deer
Park, TX, as  the only current manufacturers of  1,2,3-tr1chloropropane  1n the
United States.  Production data on 1,1,1-, 1,1,2- and 1,2,2-tMchloropropane
and tMchloropropane mixture were not  located In current sources of chemical
production and  sales Information,  suggesting  that  these   compounds have
IHtle,   1f  any,  commercial   Importance  In  the United  States.   1,2,3-Trl-
chloropropane  1s  used as  a  crossHnklng  agent, chemical  Intermediate for
agricultural  and pharmaceutical  products  (Kuney, 1985), solvent, degreaslng
agent, and paint and varnish  remover (Hawley,  1981).
    In water,  volatilization  1s  expected   to be a  p/lmary removal mechanism
for  trlchloropropanes.   The  volatilization half-life of  1,2,3-tr1chloropro-
pane from water 1 m deep, flowing at a speed  of 1 m/sec  with  a wind speed  of
3  m/sec   has  been  estimated  to  be  -9  hours.  Trlchloropropanes  are not
expected  to  undergo  significant  chemical  hydrolysis, oxidation, photolysis
(Jaber et al.,  1984), bloaccumulatlon  In  aquatic organisms or adsorption  to
suspended solids or sediments.  Insufficient data are available  to  determine
the significance of  mlcroblal  degradation  as a removal  mechanism.   In  air.
                                      1v

-------
tMchloropropanes are expected  to  exist  entirely  1n the vapor phase.  These
compounds  are  expected  to  react  with  photochemlcally  generated  hydroxyl
radicals.   Estimated  reaction   half-lives  for  1,1,1-,  1,1,2-,   1,2,2- and
1,2,3-trlchloropropane at  25°C  have  been  estimated to  be  15, 6,  30  and 7
days, respectively (U.S.  EPA, 1987b).  Potential exists  for removal  from the
atmosphere  by  dissolution  Into  clouds  and washout;  however, trlchloropro-
panes removed by dissolution or washout are.likely  to  reenter  the  atmosphere
by volatilization.  These compounds may be persistent  In the  atmosphere.   In
soil,  leaching  and  volatilization  are  expected  to  be Important  transport
processes  for  the tMchloropropanes.  These  compounds  are  not  expected  to
hydrolyze or oxidize and H  Is  not  known whether m1crob1al  degradation would
be significant  because soil  blodegradatlon studies on these compounds are
not available.
    TMchloropropane  Isomers  have  been detected In drinking  water  from New
Orleans, LA {Keith et a!., 1976), Ames,  IA  (U.S. EPA,  1983b)  and  Cincinnati,
OH  (Lucas,  1984)  and  surface  water  samples  from  Narragansett  Bay,   RI
(Wakeham et al.,  1983),  the Delaware  River  basin   (DeWalle and Chlan,  1978)
and the Rhine River  (U.S. EPA,  1983b).   Since  trlchloropropanes are volatile
compounds,  1t 1s  likely  that workers using these compounds would  be exposed
by Inhalation.   Based on  the National  Occupational  Exposure Survey,  NIOSH
(1984) estimated that 490 workers are  likely to be  occupatlonally exposed  to
1,2,3-tr1chloropropane.   Pertinent  monitoring  data  for  estimating  the  dally
human  exposure  to  trlchloropropanes by  Inhalation,   Ingestlon  of  food  and
drinking  water  or  dermal   contact   could  not   be   located  1n the  available
literature as dted 1n Appendix  A.

-------
    Little Information was available concerning effects of  trlchloropropanes
on aquatic biota.  The  only  data were  those of Hutchlnson et al.  (1980) who
reported  3-hour   EC5Qs   for   Inhibition   of  photosynthesis  of  112  mg/i
1,2,3-trlchloropropane   for   Chlamydomonas  angulosa   and   170   mg/a,  for
Chlorella vulgaMs.
    Patterns of  excretion  of  radioactivity following oral  administration  of
14C-1,2,3-tr1chloropropane  to  rats  (Slpes  et  al.,  n.d.)  are  similar   to
those  observed  following  Intravenous  treatment  (Volp  et  al.,  1984),  which
suggests  that  gastrointestinal  absorption was fairly  rapid and nearly com-
plete.  Data were not located regarding absorption  by the  respiratory tract.
    Following  Intravenous  treatment  1n   rats,   1,2,3-tr1chloropropane was
distributed  rapidly   (half-life  0.29  hours)   from the blood,  primarily  to
adipose tissue, muscle and skin  (Volp  et  al.,  1984).   After 4 hours, concen-
trations  of  radlolabel,  associated primarily with metabolites, were highest
In  the kidneys  and  liver.  No  organ or  tissue  showed  a  tendency to  retain
                                                            i
radlolabel following a single Intravenous  (Volp et al., 1984)  or  oral  (Slpes
et al., n.d.)  dose,  although  no prediction can be made for  a  chronic  dosing
schedule.
    Metabolism  of  1,2,3-tMchloropropane  appears  to  be  rapid;  and  carbon
dioxide,  at  25X of  the  dose,  Is the major  metabolite.   Urinary  metabolites
(several,   but   unidentified)  accounted  for  40%  of   the  dose  by  24  hours.
Conjugation with glutathlone  results 1n metabolites  that  are excreted  1n  the
bile.   The  metabolism  of  other  trlchloropropanes  1s  likely  to   occur  by
1somer-spec1f1c Intermediate  pathways, with  the  probability of  the formation
of Isomer-speclf1c.toxic Intermediates.   The liver appears  to be  the princi-
pal site  of  metabolism.   Excretion  of  Intravenously  administered  1,2,3-trl-
chloropropane and  Its metabolites  was  virtually complete  (99%  of  dose) by 6
                                      v1

-------
days  (Volp  et al., 1984).   Excretion  occurred  primarily by the urinary  and
respiratory  routes  (40  and 30% of dose by  24  hours)  and less (18% of  dose)
by  the  fecal  route.   Biliary excretion 1s substantial (30% of dose within  6
hours),  but  appears  to  be  followed  by  Intestinal  absorption.   Excretion
patterns  following  oral  administration (S1pes  et al.,  n.d.)  are similar  to
those following Intravenous dosing^
    Few  data were  located  regarding  the  Inhalation  toxldty  of  the  tr1-
chloropropanes.  Several  Russian  studies reported  the  effect of  l,2,3-tr1-
chloropropanes  1n  rats   exposed  continuously for  7 days to  3 months.   The
liver  and lungs appeared  to be  the  target organs  1n  these  studies,  which
reported  hlstopathologlcal  lesions  after   3  months  exposure  to  2  mg/m3
(Sldorenko et  al.,  1979; Tsulaya et al.,  1977,  1979; Bonashevskaya,  1977).
Lesions  were  not   reported  at  0.4  or   0.45   mg/m3.    Chronic  Inhalation
toxldty data were  not located.
    Oral  toxldty  data   were limited  to  subchronlc studies.   In  a  13-week
drinking  water  study   using  rats.   1,1,2- or   1,2,3-tr1chloropropane  was
administered  to  both  sexes; and  1000  mg/i  was  a LOAEL  associated  with mild
but  significant lesions  In  the  liver,  lungs   and  thyroid.  The  100  mg/l
level  was  a  NOAEL  for  both  compounds.    Subchronlc   gavage  studies  were
performed with  1,2,3-tr1chloropropane  using  rats  (NTP, 1983a)  and  mice (NTP,
1983b).   Rats  were  more  sensitive   than   mice,  as  Indicated  by  greater
mortality at  250 mg/kg,  the  highest  dosage  tested.   The  dosage of  8 mg/kg, 5
days/week  (5.7 mg/kg/day)  1n  rats  was  a   NOAEL  associated  with  transient
clinical  signs  and  blood chemistry alterations, and  elevated  relative liver
weight.  The  next higher  dosage,  16  mg/kg,  5 days/week  (11.4 mg/kg/day), was
a LOAEL asso-  dated with  c!1n1copatholog1cal evidence  of liver  damage.  The
NOAEL and  LOAEL for  mice were 32  and 63  mg/kg (22.9  and  45.0 mg/kg/day),
respectively.

-------
    Completed cardnogenldty studies were  not  located for any  of  the tr1-
ch.loropropanes by either oral or Inhalation exposure.  The NTP Is evaluating
the  cardnogenlcHy . of  1,2,3-tr1chloropropane  by gavage  In  rats  and mice
(NTP,  1986).   Data were  not located regarding  the cardnogenlclty  of  the
tMchloropropanes  by   other   routes  of  exposure.   Mutagenldty data  were
located only  for the  1,2,3-1somer.   Positive  results  were obtained  In  the
reverse mutation test  In  S.  typhlmuMum.   Results In various  mammalian test
systems were  mixed.   The mammalian  data  are difficult  to  evaluate as they
are primarily presented In only  abstract  form.
    1,2,3-Trlchloropropane was  not associated with  fetotoxldty or  terato-
genldty  In  an   Intraperltoneal   study using rats  (Hardln  et  al., 1981}  and
had  no effect  on  mating performance,  fertility or hlstomorphology  of  the
testes  In  a  dominant  lethal  study using  rats  (Salto-Suzukl  et  al.,  1982).
Data  regarding   the . developmental  or  reproductive  toxlclty  of  the other
trlchloropropanes could not  be  located  1n  the available literature as cited
1n Appendix A.
    Because  no  data were available  regarding   the  cardnogenlclty  of trl-
chloropropanes,  these chemicals  were placed 1n EPA Group D, not  classifiable
as to  human  cardnogenlclty.  A subchronlc oral  RfD, of 0.2 rag/kg/day or  14
mg/day  for a  70 kg man and a chronic oral  RfD of 0.02 mg/kg/day  or  1  mg/day
for  a  70  kg  man were  derived   for  1,1,2-trlchloropropane based on  a sub-
chronic NOAEL  of 100  mg/l  (20.3  mg/kg/day)  1n  drinking water  of  rats for
13  weeks.   At   the  LOAEL  of  1000  mg/l,  the  rats  had  hlstopathologlcal
lesions  In  the  liver,  kidney  and  thyroid  (Vllleneuve et   al.,   1985).
Uncertainty factors of  100 for   the  subchronlc  RfD and 1000 for  the  chronic
RfD  were   used.   The  uncertainty  factors  reflect  factors  of   10  each for
1nterspec1es   and Intraspecles  variability for  the subchronlc  and  chronic
RfDs and an additional  factor of 10  for  the use  of subchronlc data  to derive

-------
a  chronic  RfD.   An RQ  of  1000 was derived  for  1,1,2-tr1chloropropane based
on  the  hlstopathologlcal  lesions  In  rats  treated  at a  drinking  water level
of 1000 mg/a, for 13 weeks 1n the study by Vllleneuve et  al. (1985).
    A subchronlc oral  RfD  of 0.06 mg/kg/day or 4 mg/day  for  a  70 kg man and
a  chronic  oral  RfD of  6  wg/kg/day  or  0.4 mg/day  for  a  70  kg  man  were
derived  for  1,2,3-trlchloropropane based  on a  subchronlc oral  NOAEL  of  8
mg/kg/day,  5  days/week  (5.7  mg/kg/day) administered  to  rats  for   120  days
(NTP, 1983a).   At  the  LOAEL  of  16 mg/kg/day,  5 days/week  (11.4 mg/kg/day)
rats  had  biochemical   evidence  of   Impaired  liver  function.   Uncertainty
factors  of  100  for  the subchronlc  RfD and  1000  for  the chronic  RfD  were
used.  The uncertainty factors reflect  factors  of  10 each  for 1nterspec1es
and  Intraspedes  variability  for the  subchronlc  and  chronic  RfDs  and  an
additional  factor  of  10 for the  use  of subchronlc  data  to  derive  a chronic
RfD.  An RQ of  100 was  derived for 1,2,3-trlchloropropane based on the NOAEL
of 5.7 mg/kg/day for  slight biochemical evidence of  Impaired liver function
of rats treated for 120 days In the study by NTP (1983a).  .
                                       1x

-------
                             TABLE OF CONTENTS
                                                                       Page
1.  INTRODUCTION	     1

    1.1.   STRUCTURE AND CAS NUMBER	     1
    1.2.   PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES 	     1
    1.3.   PRODUCTION DATA	     1
    1.4.   USE DATA	     5
    1.5.   SUMMARY	     5

2.  ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND TRANSPORT	     7

    2.1.   AIR	     7

           2.1.1.   Reaction with Hydroxyl Radicals 	     7
           2.1.2.   Reaction with Ozone 	     7
           2.1.3.   Physical Removal Processes	     7

    2.2.   WATER	     7

           2.2.1.   Hydrolysis	     7
           2.2.2.   Oxidation 	     8
           2.2.3.   Photolysis	     8
           2.2.4.   M1crob1al Degradation 	     8
           2.2.5.   Adsorption	     8
           2.2.6.   B1oaccumulat1on	.•	     8
           2.2.7.   Volatilization.'	     8

    2.3.   SOIL	     9

           2.3.1.   Chemical Degradation	     9
           2.3.2.   Leaching	     9
           2.3.3.   Volatilization	     9

    2.4.   SUMMARY. . .	    10

3.  EXPOSURE	 '	    11

    3.1.   WATER	    11
    3.2.   FOOD	    11
    3.3.   INHALATION	    11
    3.4.   DERMAL	    12
    3.5.   SUMMARY	    12

4.  AQUATIC TOXICITY	    13

    4.1.   PLANT EFFECTS	    13
    4.2.   SUMMARY	    13

5.  PHARMACOKINETCS	    14

    5.1.   ABSORPTION	    14
    5.2.   DISTRIBUTION	    16

-------
                           TABLE  OF  CONTENTS (cont.)
     5.3.   METABOLISM	   19
     5.4.   EXCRETION	   21
     5.5.   SUMMARY	   22

 6.  EFFECTS .	   24

     6.1.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY	   24

            6.1.1.   Inhalation Exposures	   24
            6.1.2.   Oral Exposures	   25
            6.1.3.   Other Relevant Information	   32

     6,2.   CARCINOGENICITY	   34

            6.2.1.   Inhalation	   34
            6.2.2.   Oral	   34
            6.2.3.   Other Relevant Information	   34

     6.3.   MUTAGENICITY	   34
     6.4.   TERATOGENICITY	  .   36
     6.5.   OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS 	   36
     6.6.   SUMMARY.	   36

 7.  EXISTING GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS		  .   39

     7.1.   HUMAN.	   39
     7.2.   AQUATIC.	  .   39

 8.  RISK ASSESSMENT	   40

     8.1.   CARCINOGENICITY	   40

            8.1.1.   Weight of Evidence	   40
            8.1.2.   Quantitative Risk Estimates 	   40

     8.2.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY	'.	   40

            8.2.1.   Inhalation Exposure	   40
            8.2.2.   Oral Exposure	   41

 9.  REPORTABLE QUANTITIES	   45

     9.1.   BASED ON SYSTEMIC TOXICITY 	   45
     9.2.   BASED ON CARCINOGENICITY	   55

10.  REFERENCES	   56

APPENDIX A: LITERATURE SEARCHED	   67
APPENDIX B: SUMMARY TABLE FOR 1,1,2-TRICHLOROPROPANE 	   70
APPENDIX C: SUMMARY TABLE FOR 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE . .  	   71
                                      x1

-------
                              LIST OF TABLES

No.                              Title

1-1     Synonyms,  Structure and CAS Registry Number of Selected
        TMchloropropane  Isomers
1-2     Some Physical  Properties of Selected TMchloropropane
        Isomers ...........................     3

1-3     Production  Data  for  the TMchloropropane Isomers .......     4

5-1     Cumulative  Excretion of Radioactivity In Male Fischer 344
        Rats 8 Days Following Single Oral Doses of Radlolabeled
        1 ,2,3-TMchloropropane ....................    15

5-2     Tissue/Blood Radlolabel Concentration Ratios at
        Representative Times After Administration of 1,2,3-TM-
        chloropropane  ........................    18

6-1     Mutagen1c1ty Testing of 1 ,2,3-TMchloropropane. .......    35

9-1     Toxldty Summary for 1 ,1 ,2-Tr1chloropropane 1n a 13-Week
        Drinking Water Experiment  1n Rats ..............    46

9-2     Oral Toxldty  Summary for  1 ,2,3-TMchloropane  .........    47

9-3     Oral Composite .Scores for  1 ,1,2-Trlchloropropane
        Using Rats ...........  . .  . . ......  .....    50

9-4     Oral Composite Scores for  1,2,3-Trlchloropropane .......    52

9-5     1,1,2-TMchloropropane: Minimum  Effective Dose (MED)
        and Reportable Quantity (RQ) .................    53

9-6     1,2,3-Trlchloropropane: Minimum  Effective Dose (MED)
        and Reportable Quantity (RQ) ....... ......... .    54

-------
                             LIST OF  ABBREVIATIONS

ADI                Acceptable dally Intake
BCF                B1oconcentrat1on factor
BUN                Blood urea nitrogen
CAS                Chemical Abstract Service
CHO                Chinese hamster ovary
CNS                Central nervous system
CS                 Composite score
DMSO               Dimethyl sulfoxlde
ONA                Deoxyrlbonuclelc acid
EC5Q               Concentration effective In 50% of recipients
HPLC               High performance liquid chromatography
K                  Soil sorptlon coefficient
 oc
K                  Octanol/water partition coefficient
LDrQ               Dose lethal to 50% of recipients
LOAEL              Lowest-observed-adverse-effect level
MED                Minimum effective dose
MTD                Maximum tolerated dose
NAOPH              N1cot1nam1de adenlne dlnucleotlde phosphate, reduced form
NOAEL              No-observed-adverse-effect level
OCT                Orn1th1ne carbamyl transferase
PEL                Permlssable exposure level
ppm                Parts per million
RfD                Reference dose
RQ                 Reportable quantity
RV.                Dose-rating value
RV                 Effect-rating value
SDH                Sucdnlc dehydrogenase
SGOT               Serum glutamlc oxaloacetlc transamlnase
SGPT               Serum glutamlc pyruvlc transamlnase
STEL               Short-term exposure level
TLV                Threshold-limit value
TOC                Total organic carbon
TWA                Time-weighted average

-------
                                1.   INTRODUCTION
 1.1.   STRUCTURE AND CAS NUMBER
     The  synonyms,  structures  and  CAS  Registry  numbers  for  selected  tr1-
 chloropropanes   are  provided  In  Table   1-1.   All  of  the   trlchloropropane
 Isomers  have  a  molecular  weight  of  147.43 and an  empirical  formula  of
 C3H5C13.
 1.2.   PHYSICAL  AND  CHEMICAL  PROPERTIES
     TMchloropropanes  are colorless liquids  at  room  temperature and have an
 odor typical of chlorinated hydrocarbons (Williams, 1949).   1,2,3-Tr1chloro-
 propane 1s mlsclble  with acetone,  ethyl  alcohol  and higher alcohols, benzene
 and other  aliphatic  hydrocarbons,  and with  other chlorinated  hydrocarbons.
'It   Is  moderately to  highly  soluble  1n cellulose  derivatives,  chlorinated
 rubbers,  fats,   oils  and waxes  (Williams,  1949).  When  heated to decomposi-
 tion,   trlchloropropanes  emit  toxic  chlorine fumes   (Sax,  1984).  Selected
 physical  properties  are listed  1n  Table  1-2. The conversion factor at 20°C
 for the selected Isomers Is  1  mg/m3 =  0.16  ppm.
 1.3.   PRODUCTION  DATA
     Table  1-3  lists production  data  for  the  tMchloropropane Isomers;  no
 production data were  available for  1,1 ,l-tr1chloropropane  or  a commercial
 trlchloropropane mixture.
     SRI (1986)  dtes Dow Chemical  U.S.A.  In  Freeport, TX, and  Shell 011  Co.
 In  Deer  Park, TX, as  the only  current  domestic manufacturers  of l,2,3-tr1-
 chloropropane;  however, recent  production  volume data  could not be  located
 In  the available literature as cited  1n Appendix  A.   Production  data  for  the
 other   trlchloropropane  Isomers  could   not   be  located   1n  the  available
 literature  as   dted  In  Appendix A,  which   suggests   that  these  compounds
 have Uttle,   1f  any,   commercial   Importance  1n   the   United   States.


 OOlld                                -1-                               04/10/87

-------
o
o
                                    TABLE 1-1

Synonyms. Structures and CAS Registry  Numbers of Selected TrIchloropropane Isomers
       TrIchloropropane
                            Synonym
  Structure
CAS Registry Number
   1,1.1-TrIchloropropane
   1,1,2-TrIchloropropane
   1.2.2-TrIchloropropane
   1,2,3-TrIchloropropane
   Trlchloropropane mixture
                    ethylchloroforra
                    NR
                    NR
                    allyl  trichloride.
                    glycerol  trlchlorohydrtn
                    trtchlorohydrln
                    trIchloropropane
   Cl H  H
   I  I  I
Cl-C—C—C—H
   I  I  I
   Cl H  H

  Cl H  H
  I  I  I
H-C—C—C—H
  I  I  I
  Cl Cl H

  Cl Cl H
  I  I  I
H-C—C—C—H
  I  I  I
  H  Cl H

  Cl Cl Cl
  I  I  I
H-C—C—C—H
  I  I  I
  H  H  H

NR
     7789-89-1
      598-77-6
     3175-23-3
       96-18-4
    25735-29-9
   NR  =  Not  reported
o
•»v
CD

-------
                                                   TABLE  1-2
o
Q.
Trlchloropropane
Isoroer
1.1.1-
1.1.2-
1.2,2-
1.2.3-
i
CJ
boroe i

Melting
Point
-77.64a
-68. 7a
-66.183
-14. 7b
'nysicai m

Boiling
Point
107. Oa
130. 9a
121. 3a
156.85b
iperues or beie

Vapor
Pressure
(mm Hg)
30 (25°C)d
12 (25°C)d
19 (25°C)h
2 (20*C)b
3.1 (25*C)C
ctea iricnioropi

Water
Solubility
(rag/l)
210 (25°C)g
710 (25°C)g
710 (25*C)9
1900 (20°C)C
ropane isomers

Specific
Log Kow Gravity
3.01e 1.287j3f
2.58e 1.37215f
2.58e 1.31825f
1.98e 1.38892^^


Refractive
Index. NJJ0
1.4490a
1.46843
1.46163
1.4852a
  aU1111aros. 1949


  bDow Chemical Co.. 1985


  cNacKay and Shul. 1981


  dPerry and Green. 1984


  eU.S. EPA. 1987a


  fUeast. 1985


  QEsttmated using the equation, log 1/S = 1.221 log Kow - 0.832 (Lyroan  et al., 1982)


o "Estimated by the method of Neely and Blau (1985)
o
•^
GO

-------
                                  TABLE 1-3

               Production  Data  for the TMchloropropane Isomers*
Isomer
Company/Location
                Freeport, TX

                Dow Chemical Co.
                Midland, HI

                Columbia Organic  Chemicals Co.
                Columbia, SC

                Shell Oil Co.
                Deer Park, TX
1977 Production Volume
   (million pounds)
1,1,2-
1,2,2-
1,2,3-
Columbia Organic Chemicals Co.
Columbia, SC
Columbia Organic Chemicals Co.
Columbia, SC
Dow Chemical Co.
<0.001
<0.001
10.00-50.00
                                  (site limited  use)

                                     10.00-50.00
                                  (site limited  use)

                                        <0.001
                                      1.00-10.00
*Source: U.S. EPA, 1977
001 Id
                                              04/10/87

-------
1,1,1-TMchloropropane  1s  manufactured  by  the  reaction  of  1 ,l-d1chloropro-
pane  with  HC1  1n  the  presence  of  A1CK.   1,1,2-Tr1chloropropane  1s  manu-
factured by  the chlorlnatlon of  either  1-chloropropane  or  1,2-d1ch1oropro-
pane,  and   1,2,2-tr1chloropropane  1s  made  by  the  chlorlnatlon  of  either
1,2-d1chloropropane  or  2-chloropropane  (Williams,  1949).    1,2,3-Tr1chloro-
propane Is  derived from the chlorlnatlon  of propylene  (Hawley, 1981).
1.4.    USE  DATA
    1,2,3-TMchloropropane 1s used as  a  crossllnking agent, chemical Inter-
mediate for agricultural and pharmaceutical products  (Kuney, 1985), solvent,
degreaslng  agent,  and paint and  varnish remover  (Hawley,  1981).   Uses for
the other  Isomers  could  not  be  located 1n  the available literature as dted
1n Appendix A.
1.5.    SUMMARY
    TMchloropropanes are  colorless  liquids  at  room temperature and have an
                                                     •
odor   typical  of  chlorinated  hydrocarbons  (Williams,   1949).   They  are
sparingly  soluble  1n  water (see Table 1-2).  When  heated to decomposition,
trlchloropropanes emit  toxic chlorine  fumes (Sax,  1984).   The  U.S EPA TSCA
Production   File  (U.S.  EPA,  1977)  reported that one manufacturer produced
1,1,2- and  1,2,2-tMchloropropane and four  manufacturers produced  1,2,3-trl-
chloropropane  during  1977;  however,  this  source  contained  no  production
Information on  1,1 ,l-tr1chloropropane or  a  tMchloropropane  mixture.   SRI
(1986) cites  Dow Chemical  U.S.A.  1n  Freeport,  TX, and Shell 011 Co. 1n Deer
Park, TX, as  the only  current manufacturers  of  1,2,3-tMchloropropane 1n the
United States.  Production data on 1,1,1-,  1,1,2- and 1,2,2-tr1chloropropane
and trlchloropropane mixture were not located 1n  current  sources of  chemical
production   and  sales  Information,  suggesting   that  these  compounds  have
OOlld                               -5-                              05/12/87

-------
little,  1f  any,  commercial   Importance  1n  the  United  States.   1,2,3-TM-
chloropropane  1s  used  as  a  crossHnklng  agent, chemical  Intermediate  for
agricultural and  pharmaceutical  products  (Kuney, 1985), solvent, degreaslng
agent, and paint and varnish  remover  (Hawley,  1981).
001 Id                               -6-                              04/10/87

-------
                     2.  ENVIRONMENTAL FATE  AND  TRANSPORT

    Limited  data  pertaining  to  the  environmental- fate  and  transport  of
tMchloropropanes  were  located  1n  the  available  literature  as  dted  In
Appendix A.   Information  concerning  fate and  transport of  these  compounds
was derived from physical property  data or molecular structures.
2.1.   AIR
2.1.1.   Reaction  with Hydroxyl  Radicals.   Based  on  the  relatively  high
vapor  pressures  of  the  trlchloropropane  Isomers  (see  Table  1-2),   these
compounds  are  expected to exist almost entirely In the vapor  phase In  the
atmosphere  (E1senre1ch  et al.,  1981).  The half-lives  for  1,1,1-, 1,1,2-,
1,2,2- and   1,2,3-tMchloropropane   vapor   reacting   with   photochemically
generated hydroxyl radicals have been estimated to  be 15,  6, 30 and 7  days,
respectively,  using  an  ambient hydroxyl  radical  concentration  of S.OxlO9
molecules/cm3   and  estimated   reaction   rate  constants   of   6.7xlO~13,
1.6xlO~12,   3.3xlO~ia   and    l.SxlO"12    cm'-sec/molecule,    respectively,
at 25°C (U.S. EPA, 1987b).
2.1.2.   Reaction  with  Ozone.   TMchloropropanes  are  not   susceptible  to
oxidation by ozone (U.S. EPA,  1987b).
2.1.3.   Physical  Removal  Processes.   Based  on  the  water   solubilities
listed  In  Table  1-2,  potential  exists  for  removal   of  small  amounts  of
trlchloropropanes  from  the  atmosphere  by   dissolution  Into clouds  or  wet
deposition;  however,   any  trlchloropropane   removed  from  the  atmosphere by
dissolution or washout 1s likely to reenter  the  atmosphere  by volatilization.
2.2.   WATER
2.2.1.   Hydrolysis.    Based  on  estimated  neutral  hydrolysis  reaction rate
constants   of   2xlO"«,  8x10"*,   8xlO"»  and   8xlO"5  hour"1   for  1,1,1-,


OOlld                               -7-                              04/10/87

-------
1,1,2-,  1,2,2- and   1,2,3-tMchloropropane,   respectively,   hydrolysis  of
trlchloropropanes   1s  not  expected to  be  environmentally  relevant (Jaber et
al., 1984).
2.2.2.   Oxidation.   Trlchloropropanes  are not  expected  to  be  susceptible
to oxidation (Jaber et al.,  1984).
2.2.3.   Photolysis.  Photolysis  of  trlchloropropanes  Is  not  expected to be
environmentally relevant (Jaber et al., 1984).
2.2.4.   M1crob1al  Degradation.   An  aerobic  blodegradatlon  screening  study
using  55  mg/i  of  1,2,3-tMchloropropane  Inoculated  with  activated  sludge
at  25°C  resulted  1n  40,  51  and  76%  TOC removal  after  2,  4  and 6  hours,
respectively (Matsul et al., 1975).
2.2.5.   Adsorption.  Given  the water  solubilities  of the  trlchloropropane
Isomers  listed  1n  Table  1-2  and  KQC values  of  69-231  (Section  2.3.2.),
physical adsorption of  these  compounds to suspended solids and  sediments  Is
not expected to be significant.
2.2.6.   B1oaccumulat1on.    Based  on  the  estimated log  K    values  listed
                                                           ow
1n Table 1-2, BCFs  of 114,  54,  54 and  19  were  estimated  for  1,1,1-,  1,1,2-,
1,2,2- and   1,2,3-trVchloropropane,    respectively,    using   the   following
equation (Lyman  et al.,  1982):  log  BCF  = 0.76  log KQW  - 0.23.  These  BCF
values suggest  that bloaccumulatlon of trlchloropropanes 1n aquatic  organ-
Isms would be of limited environmental  significance.
2.2.7.   Volatilization.   The  half-life  for  evaporation  of  1,2,3-trlchloro-
propane from a  1  ppm aqueous solution at  25°C  with a  depth  of  6.5 cm, under
200 rpm  stirring  In  still  air  (<0.2  mph air  currents)  was measured  to  be
56.1  minutes  (Dining,  1977).   Henry's  Law  constant for  1,2,3-tMchloro-
propane  has  been  estimated  to  be  2xlO~*  atm-mVmol  based  on  a  vapor
pressure of 2 mm Hg  at  20°C and  a  water  solubility  of  1900 mg/i at 20°C.
OOlld                               -8-                              05/12/87

-------
Using  this  value of  Henry's Law  constant  and  the  method of  Lyman  et al.
(1982), the  volatilization  half-life  of this  compound  from water 1 m  deep,
flowing  at   a  speed  of  1  m/sec  with  a  wind  speed  of  3 m/sec  has  been
estimated to be  8.8  hours.   These  data  suggest that volatilization may be a
primary method for removal of 1,2,3-tMchloropropane from water.  Because of
the  similarities 1n  the physical  properties among  the  trlchloropropanes,
volatilization Is also  expected to  be  a primary  removal  mechanism for the
other trlchloropropane Isomers.
2.3.   SOIL
2.3.1.   Chemical  Degradation.    Based   on  Information  available  on  the
chemical degradation  of  trlchloropropanes  In  water,  these compounds are not
expected to hydrolyze or  oxidize 1n soil (see  Sections  2.2.1. and  2.2.2.).
2.3.2.   Leaching.    The   KQC   values,  of   1,1,1-,   1,1,2-,   1,2,2- and
1,2,3-tMchloropropanes  were estimated  to  be 231, 118,  118 and  69, respec-
tively, using the water solubility data given  1n Table  1-2,  and the equation
log  KQ   =  -0.55 log  S  *  3.64 (Lyman  et  al.,  1982).   KQC  values  of 72,
79, 72 and 99 were estimated for 1,1,1-, 1,1,2-,  1,2,2-  and 1,2,3-tMchloro-
propane using the quantitative  structure-activity  analysis  method of SablJIc
(1984).  Based  on  these  K    values  trlchloropropanes  are expected  to  be
highly mobile 1n  soil (Swann et  al.,  1983).
2.3.3.   Volatilization.    The   relatively   high  vapor   pressure  of   the
trlchloropropane   Isomers  (ranging  from 3-30  mm  Hg  at  25°C)  suggest  that
volatilization from dry soil surfaces 1s likely  to be  significant.   Evapora-
tion  from moist  soils may also  be significant since these  compounds do  not
tend  to adsorb  to   soil  and apparently  evaporate rapidly  from water  (see
Sections 2.2.7.  and  2.3.2.).
OOlld                               -9-                              05/12/87

-------
2.4.   SUMMARY
    In water,  volatilization  1s  expected to  be  a primary  removal  mechanism
for  trlchloropropanes.   The volatilization  half-life  of  1,2,3-tMchloropro-
pane from water 1 m deep,  flowing  at  a  speed  of  1 m/sec  with a wind speed of
3  m/sec  has   been  estimated  to  be  ~9  hours.    Trlchloropropanes  are  not
expected  to  undergo  significant  chemical  hydrolysis, oxidation,  photolysis
(Jaber et al.,  1984), bloaccumulatlon 1n aquatic  organisms  or  adsorption to
suspended solids or sediments.   Insufficient  data are available to determine
the  significance  of  mlcroblal degradation as  a  removal  mechanism.   In  air,
trlchloropropanes are  expected  to  exist entirely  In  the  vapor  phase.   These
compounds  are  expected   to  react  with  photochemlcally  generated  hydroxyl
radicals.   Estimated  reaction  half-lives   for   1,1,1-,  1,1,2-,  1,2,2- and
1,2,3-trlchloropropane at 25°C  have  been estimated  to  be  15,  6, 30 and  7
days, respectively (U.S.  EPA,  1987b).   Potential  exists  for removal from the
atmosphere by  dissolution  Into  clouds  and  washout;  however,  trlchloroprd-
panes removed  by dissolution  or  washout  are  likely to reenter the atmosphere
by volatilization.  These  compounds may  be persistent In the atmosphere.  In
soil,  leaching and  volatilization are  expected  to be  Important transport
processes  for  the  trlchloropropanes.   These  compounds  are  not  expected to
hydrolyze or oxidize  and  H  1s  not known whether mlcroblal degradation would
be  significant because  soil  blodegradatlon  studies  on   these  compounds are
not available.
OOlld                               -10-                             05/12/87

-------
                                 3.   EXPOSURE
3.1.   WATER
    1,1,1-Trlchloropropane and  1,2,3-tMchloropropane have  been  detected at
concentrations  of  <0.1   and   0.2   yg/l,   respectively,   In  drinking  water
taken  from the Carrollton Water Plant 1n New Orleans, LA, during August 1974
(Keith  et al.,  1976).   1,2,3-TMchloropropane  was  also  detected  1n  the
drinking  water  of  Ames,   IA  (U.S.  EPA,  1983b) and  trlchloropropane  (Isomer
not  specified)  was  qualitatively  Identified  1n  drinking water  taken from
Cincinnati,  OH  during   1978   (Lucas,  1984).   1,2,3-TMchloropropane  was
qualitatively Identified  1n  water  samples  taken  from  Narragansett  Bay,  RI
during  1979-1981  (Wakeham et  al.,   1983)  and trlchloropropane  (Isomer  not
specified) was detected  In 1/30  water  samples  taken from the Delaware River
1n  February,  1976  (DeWalle  and  Chlan,  1978).   1,2,3-TMchloropropane  has
also been found In the Rhine River  1n Germany  at maximum  and mean concentra-
tions  of  0.1  and  1.3  yg/i,  respectively  (U.S.  EPA,   1983b)l   Trlchloro-
propane  (Isomer   not specified)  was  Identified   1n water   taken   from  an
advanced waste treatment  plant  1n Lake Tahoe, CA, during 1974  (Lucas,  1984).
3.2.   FOOD
    Pertinent monitoring  data regarding the presence of tMchloropropanes 1n
food could not be  located 1n  the available  literature as dted 1n Appendix A.
3.3.   INHALATION
    Limited  monitoring   data  were  available  concerning  the  detection  of
tMchloropropanes  1n  the  atmosphere.   Since tMchloropropanes are  volatile.
It  1s  likely  that  workers using these compounds  would be exposed by  Inhala-
tion.   Based  on  the National  Occupational  Exposure   Survey,  NIOSH  (1984)
estimated  that  490  workers  are  likely   to   be  occupatlonally  exposed  to
OOlld                               -11-                             05/12/87

-------
1,2,3-trlchloropropane.-    1,2,3-TMchloropropane   was   detected    In   the
atmosphere of  Bochum,  Germany  at  a  concentration  of 0.4  yg/m3  (U.S. EPA,
1983b).
3.4.   DERMAL
    Pertinent data  regarding  dermal  exposure to trlchloropropanes could not
be located 1n the available literature as  cited  1n Appendix  A.
3.5.   SUMMARY
    TMchloropropane Isomers  have  been detected 1n  drinking water  from New
Orleans, LA  (Keith  et al., 1976), Ames, IA  (U.S. EPA,  1983b) and  Cincinnati,
OH  (Lucas,   1984),  and  surface  water samples  from  Narragansett  Bay,   RI
(Wakeham et  al.,  1983).  the  Delaware  River  basin  (DeWalle  and Chlan,  1978)
and the Rhine River (U.S.  EPA,  1983b).  Since trlchloropropanes are  volatile
1t 1s  likely that  workers  using these compounds would be exposed  by Inhala-
tion.   Based on  the  National  Occupational  Exposure Survey,  NIOSH  (1984)
estimated  that   490 workers  are  -likely   to be  occupatlonally  exposed   to
1,2,3-trlchloropropane.   Pertinent monitoring data  for estimating the dally
human  exposure  to  trlchloropropanes   by  Inhalation,  1ngest1on  of  food  and
drinking  water  or  dermal  contact  could  not  be  located  In the available
literature as cited 1n Appendix A.
OOlld                               -12-                             05/12/87

-------
                             4.   AQUATIC  TOXICITY

    Pertinent data  regarding  acute  or  chronic toxlclty of tMchloropropanes
to  aquatic  organisms could  not  be  located  In the  available  literature as
cited 1n Appendix A.
4.1.   PLANT EFFECTS
    Hutchlnson  et  al.   (1980)   reported  3-hour   EC5Qs   for   Inhibition  of
photosynthesis   of   112   mg/a   1,2,3-tr1chloropropane   for   Chlamydomonas
anqulosa and 170 mg/l for  Chlorella  vulgarls.
4.2.   SUMMARY
    Little Information was available concerning effects of tMchloropropanes
on aquatic biota.   The  only  data were  those of Hutchlnson et al. (1980) who
reported  3-hour  EC,Qs   for   Inhibition  of   photosynthesis   of  112  mg/l
1,2,3-tMchloropropane  for   Chlamydomonas    anqulosa  and   170  mg/l  for
Chlorella vulqarls.
OOlld                               -13-                             05/12/87

-------
                             5.  PHARMACOKINETICS
5.1.   ABSORPTION
  •
    S1pes  et  al.  (n.d.)  reported  the  results  of  oral  administration  of
single  doses of  14C-1,2,3-tMchloropropane  In  ethanol/Emulphor  EL-60/water
to  groups  of three male Fischer 344 rats at 0.35, 3.0  or  32  mg/kg..   Cumula-
tive  excretion  of radioactivity 1n  urine  and  feces  during an  8-day  collec-
tion  period  are  presented  1n  Table 5-1.   Because total  recovery was  particu-
larly  low  1n the 3.0 mg/kg group, expired air was collected  from one rat 1n
this  group for 24 hours  and  was  found  to  contain  "30% of  the administered
dose  of radioactivity.   Upon sacrifice  at  8 days,  the  body  was found  to
contain -1-3% of  the dose of radioactivity.
    Assuming exhalation of -30%  of the  dose,  urinary  excretion  of 37.6-56.3%
and body  retention of  -2%, a  minimal gastrointestinal  absorption of  -70-80%
can be  estimated.   Alternatively,  minimum gastrointestinal absorption can be
estimated  by subtracting the  percentage  of  the dose recovered 1n the feces
from  100%.   Using  this  method,  minimum  gastrointestinal  absorption  of
-75-83% can  be estimated.  In this  study, however,  total  recovery  was only
54.3-81.6%.
    Biliary  excretion  may  be  substantial  as  demonstrated  by  Volp  et  al.
(1984),  who  administered  an  Intravenous  3.6 mg/kg  dose  of  14C-1,2,3-tr1-
chloropropane  to  male  Fischer  344  rats  with  bile duct  cannulae and recovered
30% of  the dose of radioactivity  1n the bile  within  6  hours (Section 5.4.).
In  Intact  rats at  24 hours  after treatment,  18% of the dose was  recovered 1n
the feces, 50%  In  the  urine  and  30% 1n the expired air.  The similarities In
the disposition  of radioactivity following Intravenous  administration of 3.6
mg/kg  and  oral administration of  0.35-32 mg/kg suggest  that  both   previous
                                              *
estimates  of minimum extent  of gastrointestinal absorption  are low  and  that
absorption may be  virtually complete.

OOlld                               -14-                              05/12/87

-------
                                   TABLE  5-1

        Cumulative Excretion of Radioactivity In Male Fischer 344 Rats
              8 Days Following Single Oral Doses of Radlolabeled
                            1,2,3-Tr1chloropropanea
Dose
(mg/kg)
0.35b
3.0b
3.2C
Percent of
Urine
42.5
37.6
56.3
Dose Recovered
Feces
19.5
16.8
25.3
1n
Total
62.0
54.3
81.6
aSource: Slpes et al., n.d.
cn=3
OOlld                               -15-                              05/12/87

-------
    The excretion data reported by Slpes et al.  (n.d.)  suggest  that  the  rate
of absorption from the gastrointestinal tract  Is  fairly  rapid  following  oral
administration.   Urinary  excretion  at  all   three  dose  levels   was   >91%
complete within  the  first 24  hours,  accounting  for 34-51% of  the  dose.   An
additional  30% was  recovered  from  the expired  air  of one  3.0  mg/kg  rat
within  24  hours,  which  also  suggests  that  the  rate  of  gastrointestinal
absorption  Is fairly rapid.
5.2.   DISTRIBUTION
    Volp  et al.  (1984)  Investigated  the fate of [1,3-14C]-l,2,3-trlchloro-
propane  In  young adult  male  Fischer 344  rats given  single  Intravenous 3.6
mg/kg  doses.   Following  administration,   the  disappearance  of   unchanged
parent compound  from the  blood was  observed  to  be  rapid  and  blexponentlal,
with a phase  I  (distribution  phase)  half-life  of 0.29 hours.  These observa-
tions  suggest rapid  uptake by the tissues of  the body.  Maximum  levels of
radioactivity In adipose  tissue,  skin and muscle were reached  by 15 minutes,
with  37,  16  and  18%  of  the  dose located In these  tissues,  respectively.
These  tissues contained  most  of  the radioactivity  that  remained 1n the body
through 4 hours posttreatment.  After 4 hours, the liver contained a greater
portion of  the  administered  dose   than  did other  tissues.   Maximum levels of
radioactivity 1n the liver (7.3%   of dose) and  small Intestinal tissue  (9.3%
of dose)  were measured  at 1  hour, 1n  the  kidney (2.8% of  dose)  at 2  hours
and In large  Intestinal tissue  (2.0% of dose) at 8 hours.
    The concentration  of unaltered parent compound  as well as total  radio-
activity was  measured 1n  several tissues,  and  for  all tissues the rate of
decline  of   unchanged  parent   compound  was   found  to  be  greater   than  the
decline of  total  radioactivity.   At 1 hour, parent compound  consisted of
    0
<10% of the radioactivity present In liver and  kidney and  45  and  34% of  the


OOlld                               -16-                             05/12/87

-------
radioactivity  In  muscle and  skin,  respectively.   By  24  hours, parent  com-
pound  had  declined to  <12% of the radioactivity  In  these tissues as  well.
In  fat,  however,  unaltered  parent  compound was  69%  of  the  radioactivity
present at 4 hours and 37% at 24 hours.
    The concentrations  of  radlolabel  1n tissue/blood for  several  tissues  at
three  time  points are  presented  1n Table  5-2.   With  the exception  of  the
data  for  adipose  tissue,   levels  of  radioactivity  represent  predominantly
metabolites.  Coupled with  the data presented above, these data suggest that
adipose tissue may serve as a primary  but  temporary depot for  the distribu-
tion of 1,2,3-tMchloropropane.  No tissue  studied exhibited  a  propensity  to
bloaccumulate  the  parent  compound  following  a  single  dose.   The  levels  of
radioactivity 1n the  liver  and kidneys  appear to  be relatively persistent.
    Slpes et  al.  (n.d.) reported  the tissue  concentrations  of  radioactivity
In  several   tissues  of   rats  at  8  days  after  single   oral   doses  of
l4C-l,2,3-tr1chloropropane   to be  0.35,  3.0  or   32  mg/kg.    Concentrations
were expressed as percent of  the dose  In  each tissue and as  the ratio of the
concentration  In  tissue to  blood.   Because total recovery  of  radioactivity
1n this experiment was  low, IHtle confidence can be  placed  1n the absolute
values reported.   Generally,  however,  these data  confirm  the observations
reported by Volp et al. (1984) following  Intravenous  administration.   At all
dose  levels,  the  greatest   percentages  of  the  dose  of  radioactivity were
located  In  the muscle,  blood, skin  and adipose  tissue.   Ratios  of  tissue
radioactivity  to  blood radioactivity  at  8  days  were  >1  only  In  liver and
kidneys,   and  this  occurred  only   at   the  low and  high  doses.   No  tissue
appeared to  retain radioactivity  to a  great extent following  oral adminis-
tration.
OOlld                               -17-                             05/12/87

-------
                                  TABLE 5-2

                Tissue/Blood  Radlolabel Concentration Ratios at
                 Representative Times After  Administration  of
                     1,2,3-TMchloropropane  (x±SO, n=3)a«b
Tissue
Liver
Kidneys
Adipose tissue
Skin
Muscle
Testes
Ep1d1dym1des
Blood concentration
(nmol-equ1v/g)

1 Hour
2.9*0.2
5.4*1.1
6.5*2.4
0.9*0.3
0.4*0.1
0.5*0.1
1.8*0.1
11.0*0.0
Time
8 Hours
5.5*0.4
10.8*0.3
2.7*0.4
1.3*0.3
0.4*0.1
0.7*0.1
ND
4.8*0.2

2 Days
4.1*0.7
6.7*1.7
0.6*0.5
0.6*0.2
0.3*0.1
0.2*0.1
0.6*0.0
2.0*0.3
aSource: Volp et al., 1984

b3.6 mg/kg Intravenous

NO > Not determined
OOlld
-18-
04/10/87

-------
 5.3.   METABOLISM
     In the  rat  study  by Volp et  al.  (1984) (see  Section  5.2.),  25X of  the
 administered dose  of  radioactivity was  recovered  from  the expired  air as
 carbon dioxide within 24 hours.   Urinary  excretion of metabolites within 24
 hours  accounted  for 40X of the dose.  In  rats  with biliary cannulae, 28.5X
 of the administered dose was recovered from the bile as metabolites within 6
 hours.  Although these urinary and biliary metabolites have not been  defini-
 tively Identified,  the  Investigators  noted that  a large  number  of  metabo-
 lites  were  present  and  that  no  one metabolite  constituted  >10%  of   the
 administered dose.   The  large number of urinary metabolites observed  and  the
 rapid  recovery  of  25X  of  the dose as  expired carbon dioxide  suggest  that
'one- and   two-carbon  fragments may  have  been   Incorporated  Into endogenous
 molecules.
     Volp  et  al.  (1984)  suggested  that  the biliary metabolites were products
 of glutathlone  conjugation,  formed either  by  direct  conjugation  following
 dechlortnatlon  or  after cytochrome P-450  catalyzed oxidation.   Administra-
 tion  of   glycldol   to   deplete  hepatic  glutathlone  before  treatment  with
 l4C-l,2,3-tr1chloropropane   resulted  1n   a  69-84X reduction   In  excreted
 biliary   radlolabel.   Reacting  bile  from  non-glyc1dol   treated  rats  with
 2,4-d1n1trofluorobenzene (to  form  2,4-d1n1trophenyl derivatives  of products
 of glutathlone  conjugation  that  are separable by  HPLC) led  to  the separation
 of  five  major  fractions  representing metabolites formed  from  conjugation
 with glutathlone.  Four  of  these  fractions  were present  at very  low  concen-
 trations   and  the  fifth was  decreased  by  40X  1n the  bile  from  glyddol-
 treated  rats.   These data support the theory that  glutathlone  conjugation 1s
 Important In the metabolism of 1,2,3-tr1chloropropane and suggest that  the
 liver  1s  the major  site  of  this  blotransformatlon reaction.


 OOlld                                -19-                              04/10/87

-------
    Several  ]_n  vitro studies  have  been performed  with  various chlorinated
alkanes  to   Investigate   their  Interactions  with  mlcrosomal   hepatic  drug
metabolizing  enzymes,  and  the Impact  of  chemical structure  on   enzymatic
dechloMnatlon  and  the  mechanisms  by  which  1t  occurs  (Ivanetlch  et  al.,
1978; Van Dyke and Wlneman, 1971; Salmon et al.,  1981).  1,2,3-TMchloropro-
pane has  been shown  to  undergo Type I binding  to  cytochrome P-450  derived
from the livers of phenobarbHol-lnduced male Wlstar rats and cause  degrada-
tion of  Us  heme  moiety  (Ivanetlch  et al.,  1978).   Van  Dyke  and  Wlneman
(1971)   Investigated  the  dechlorlnatlon  of several  chlorinated  ethanes  and
propanes 1n  a system using mlcrosomes  and cell  supernatant from  the livers
of male rats.  Dechlorlnatlon was found to be  NADPH-dependent.   The presence
of a single hydrogen molecule  on  the dechlorlnated carbon atom appeared  to
enhance  dechlorlnatlon.    After  30  minutes of  Incubation  In  this  system,
1,1,2-tr1chloropropane, the only  trlchloropropane tested, was  40.8% dechlor-
lnated.   By  comparison,  dechlorlnatlon of  various mono- and  dlchloHnated
propanes ranged from 2.5-24.6X.
    Salmon  et al.  (1981)  noted marked differences  1n  the  toxic  potencies of
several haloalkanes  that  appeared to be  roughly correlated with  the extent
of  dechlorlnatlon  they  undergo ^n  vivo.   It  had  been  suggested  that  the
breaking of  a C-C1  bond,  presumably with  the formation  of  a  reactive Inter-
mediate, was  responsible  for  the  toxldty  of  these  compounds.   These authors
Investigated  the  enzymatic  dechlorlnatlon of  six  chlorinated ethanes  and
reviewed the  data of  Van  Dyke and  Wlneman  (1971)  for  chlorinated ethanes  and
propanes.  and  concluded   that  the  extent  of  dechlorlnatlon  was  strongly
dependent on  molecular  structure.   They also noted that the  tendency toward
dechlorlnatlon was  not  linearly correlated with  either  the  effective charge
                                    a
on  the  most  electron-deficient carbon atom  or   with  hydrophobldty of  the

001 Id                               -20-                             05/12/87

-------
 test  chemical,  which  suggested  to  them  that  dechloMnatlon  of  different
 chloroalkanes probably proceeds by different mechanisms.
    According  to the data of  Van  Dyke  and Wlneman (1971) and Salmon  et  al.
 (1981),  marked  differences may  be expected  1n  the metabolic reactions  and
 their rates  In  the  b1otransformat1on  of  the  various Isomers  of  trlchloropro-
 pane.   Since  toxic  potency  and  effects  may  depend at  least  partially  on
 these reactions, marked  differences  may also be expected  1n  the  toxldty of
 these chemicals.
 5.4.   EXCRETION
    Following  the  Intravenous  administration of a  single 3.6 mg/kg  dose of
 14C-l,2,3-tr1chloropropane to  male  rats,  99% of  the dose  of  radioactivity
was  excreted within 6  days  through  urine,  feces   and  expired  air  (Volp et
al., 1984).  Total  excretion  appeared to be  blphaslc with half-times of  5.1
and  44  hours for phase  I  and phase  II,  respectively.   Within the  first 24
hours,  expired  air  contained  30%  of  the  dose  of  radioactivity,  urine
contained 40% and feces 18%.
    The  expiration  of  unchanged  parent  compound,   accounting  for 5%  of  the
dose, was  trlphaslc  with half-times of 0.44, 1.2  and 4.0 hours,  and was  85%
complete  after   4  hours.  Expiration  of  carbon dioxide  was blphaslc  with
half-times of 1.2'and 3.4 hours.
                                                    •r
    Unchanged  parent  compound   was   not   detected  In  urine.    Intestinal
contents contained 1% of the dose as  unchanged  compound at 15 and 30 minutes
but <0.1%  of  the dose  at >4 hours.   Excretion  by  either  route was blphaslc,
with half-times  of  2.6  and  54  hours  for  urinary  excretion and  5.1  and 44
hours for fecal excretion.
    In rats  with biliary cannulae,  30% of the  dose  of  radioactivity (5% of
                                                                    0
dose as  unchanged  compound)  was recovered from  the bile  within  6 hours.  At


OOlld                               -21-                              05/12/87

-------
24 hours,  only  18% of the dose was  found  1n the feces, which  suggests  that
Intestinal  absorption  of  biliary  excretion  products  occurred,   followed
possibly by further metabolism and excretion by alternate routes.
    The  excretion of  radioactivity  following  oral  treatment  of rats  with
14C-l,2,3-tr1chloropropane at  doses  of  0.35,  3.0 and  32  mg/kg (Slpes  et
al., n.d.)  was  reported  1n  Section  5.1.   Although confidence  In these  data
1s  low  because  total  recovery  of  radioactivity was  poor,   the  excretion
patterns  following oral  treatment  are  similar  to those following  Intravenous
treatment.  Urinary  excretion accounted  for 37.6-56.3% and  fecal  excretion
for 16.8-25.3X  of the dose  by  8 days posttreatment.   Expiration of  ~30X of
the dose occurred within 24 hours.
5.5.   SUMMARY
    Patterns of  excretion of radioactivity  following  oral  administration of
l4C-l,2,3-tr1chloropropane  to-  rats   (Slpes  et  al.,  n.d.)  are  similar  to
those  observed  following  Intravenous  treatment  (Volp et al., 1984),  which
suggests  that  gastrointestinal  absorption  was  fairly  rapid  and  nearly
complete.   Data  were  not located  regarding  absorption by  the  respiratory
tract.
    Following  Intravenous  treatment  1n  rats,  1,2,3-tr1chloropropane  was
distributed  rapidly   (half-life  0.29  hours)  from the  blood, primarily to
adipose  tissue, muscle and skin  (Volp  et  al., 1984).   After 4  hours, concen-
trations  of  radlolabel,  associated primarily  with metabolites, were highest
1n the  kidneys  and  liver.   No  organ  or  tissue showed  a  tendency  to retain
radlolabel following a single Intravenous  (Volp et al., 1984)  or  oral (Slpes
et al.,  n.d.) dose,  although no  prediction  can be made for a  chronic dosing
schedule.
OOlld                               -22-                             05/12/87

-------
    Metabolism  of  1,2,3-tMchloropropane  appears  to  be  rapid,  and  carbon
dioxide, at  25% of the dose,  1s  the major metabolite.  Urinary  metabolites
(several,  but  unidentified)  accounted  for  40%  of  the  dose by  24  hours.
Conjugation with glutathlone results 1n metabolites that are  excreted  1n  the
urine.   The  metabolism  of  other  trlchloropFopanes  1s  likely to  occur  by
1somer-spec1f1c Intermediate pathways, with the probability of the  formation
of  1somer-spedf1c  toxic  Intermediates.   The  liver   appears   to  be  the
principal  site  of  metabolism.    Excretion   of  Intravenously administered
1,2,3-tr1chloropropane and  Us metabolites was virtually  complete (99%  of
dose) by 6  days (Volp et a!., 1984).   Excretion occurred  primarily  through
the urine and  expired  air (40  and 30% of dose by 24 hours) and less  (18% of
dose) by the  feces.   Biliary  excretion 1s substantial  (30% of dose within 6
hours),   but  appears  to  be followed  by  Intestinal  absorption.    Excretion
patterns following  oral  administration (Slpes et al.,  n.d.)  are similar  to
those following Intravenous  dosing.
001 Id                               -23-                             05/12/87

-------
                                 6.  EFFECTS
6.1.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
6.1.1.   Inhalation Exposures.
    6.1.1.1.   SUBCHRONIC — Several    Inhalation   studies   with   1.2,3-trl-
chloropropane  In  adult male white  rats,  all  performed  at the same  labora-
tory,  have been  reported  (Tsulaya  et al.,  1977,  1979;  Bonashevskaya  and
Belyaeva,  1975, Bonashevskaya, 1977; Bonashevskaya et al.,  1978;  Belyaeva et
al., 1977; Tarasova, 1975;  Shalpak,  1976; Sldorenko  et al.,  1979).   Although
H  was  not  clearly   stated  1n  each   report,   1t  appears  that  continuous
exposure was  used 1n all of  these  experiments and the  duration  of  exposure
ranged from 7 days to 3 months.
    The  evaluated  parameters of  toxldty  Included rate  of  body weight  gain,
hematology,  and   hlstopathologlcal  appearance   of   the  liver   and  lungs.
Several  h1stochem1cal,  biochemical and  CNS  function  parameters  of unknown or
questionable  biological  significance  were  also reported.   The  nature  and
severity  of  the  effects  observed   at  each  concentration were  not  always
clearly presented.
    In experiments  lasting  <3 months,  which Investigated atmospheric concen-
trations  of  0.2-800  mg/m3  1,2,3-tr1chloropropane,   no  effects  on   rate of
body weight gain  or hematologlcal parameters  occurred 1n rats at  any concen-
tration  tested (Sldorenko et al., 1979; Tsulaya  et al.,  1979; Bonashevskaya,
1977).   At 2  mg/m3,  mild  hlstopathologlcal  lesions  1n the  Hver   Included
mlcrodrculatory  alterations,  fatty Infiltration,  hypochromlc and   (rarely)
lysed  nuclei  (Tsulaya  et al., 1977).   Significant hlstopathologlcal altera-
tions  1n  the  liver  were not  observed at  0.45  mg/m3  (Bonashevskaya,  1977)
or 0.4 mg/m3 (Tsulaya et al., 1977).
001 Id                               -24-                             05/12/87

-------
    The  lungs  appeared  to be another target organ  In  these  studies.   Degen-
erative  lesions  (desquamatlon and  proliferation  of  bronchial  and bronchlolar
epithelium, macrophage  Infiltration  and  "reactive alterations  In the  pleural
mesothellum"  were reported  at   2  mg/m3  but  not at  0.4  mg/m3  (Tsulaya  et
al.,  1977).   Based  on  the effects  reported  1n the  liver  and  lungs,  known
target  organs  for  1,2,3-tr1chloropropane  (Section   6.1.2.1.),  continuous
exposure  to  2  mg/ra3  appears   to  be  a  subchronlc  LOAEL  and  0.4  mg/m3  a
NOAEL for rats In these Russian  studies.
    6.1.1.2.   CHRONIC — Pertinent  data  regarding  the  chronic  toxlclty  of
Inhalation  exposure  to  the  trlchloropropanes  could  not be  located   In  the
available literature as dted 1n Appendix A.
6.1.2.   Oral Exposures.
    6.1.2.1.   SUBCHRONIC ~ Vllleneuve    et    al.    (1985)    administered
1,1,2- or 1,2,3-tr1chloropropane to  groups  of 10 male  and  10 female  weanling
Sprague-Oawley rats  at  concentrations  of  1,  10,   100  or  1000  mg/i   In  the
drinking water  for  13  weeks.    Emulphor  (0.5X) was  used  as  a  solub1l1z1ng
agent:   Controls  consisted  of   a  group  given  tap  water  alone  and  another
group given  tap  water  containing Emulphor.   Parameters evaluated  Included
clinical  appearance,  body weight,  water  consumption  and  at  termination,
comprehensive  hematology   and   clinical   serum  chemistry   determinations,
hepatic   mixed-function  oxldase activities,  organ  weights  and  hlstopatho-
loglcal  examination of major (unspecified) organs and tissues.
    The  equivalent  dosages of  each  test  chemical  for  each  treatment group
are estimated  from starting body  weight,  weight gain and water Intake data
provided  by  the  Investigators  for   vehicle  control  rats  and  groups  that
differed significantly  from vehicle controls.   For  1,1,2-tr1chloropropane,
males Ingested -0,  0.15,  1.5,  15.0  or  150 mg/kg/day  and females Ingested 0,


OOlld                                -25-                             04/10/87

-------
 0.20,  2.0, 20.3  or  203 mg/kg/day  at 0,  1,  10,  100 and  1000  mg/i, respec-
 tively.   For  1,2,3-trlchloropropane,  doses  were  estimated at  0,  0.15,  1.5,
 15.0 and  113 mg/kg/day  for males and  0,  0.20, 2.0, 17.6  and  149 mg/kg/day
 for  females,  respectively.
     One  male  given  1000  mg/l  and  one  female  given  100  mg/l  I,l,2-tr1-
 chloropropane  died   of  undetermined  causes.   Water  consumption  and  body
 weight  gain were  unaffected  by  treatment at any  level.   Increased relative
 liver  weight was  noted  1n 1000  mg/l males  and  Increased serum  cholesterol
 was  measured  1n  1000  mg/l females.  There were  no  effects on hematology or
 mixed-function   oxldase  activity.   H1ld  but  significant  hlstopathologlcal
 lesions  were  observed 1n  the  liver,  kidney  and thyroid of males  and  females
'at  1000  mg/l  but  not  at <100  mg/l.   Liver  changes  Included  anlsokaryo-
 s1s, accentuated  zonatlon  and  occasional  fatty vacuolatlon.    Kidney  effects
 Included   eos1noph1l1c  Inclusions,  pyknosls,  nuclear  displacement,   fine
 glomerular adhesions and  occasionally  Interstitial  reactions  and hlstologlc
 protelnurla.    Thyroid  changes  consisted   of  angular  collapse  of   some
 follicles, reduction  In  colloid  density  and  Increased  epithelial  height.
 Lesions  appeared  to be  milder and  less prevalent 1n females than males.   In
 this study,  the  level  of 1000  mg/l,  150  mg/kg/day  1n  the  males and  203
 mg/kg/day   In   the-  females,   was  clearly  a  LOAEL,  and   100   mg/l,   15.0
 mg/kg/day  In males and 20.3 mg/kg/day 1n females,  was a NOAEL.
     1,2,3-Trlchloropropane  appeared   to  be   slightly   more   toxic   than
 1,1,2-trlchloropropane  1n  this  study.   Water  Intake  and body   weight  gain
 were reduced  1n  rats  of  both  sexes  at 1000 mg/l 1,2,3-tr1chloropropane,
 and  water  consumption was reduced  In  females at  100 mg/l.   One  100  mg/l
 female  died,  but  the  cause  of death could  not  be  determined.   Elevated
 relative  organ  weights  were  observed  1n  the  livers and kidneys  In males at


 OOlld                                -26-                             04/10/87

-------
 1000 mg/l  and  1n females  at  100 and 1000 mg/l,  and In the  brains  1n both
 sexes  at  1000  mg/l.   The  Increased  relative kidney and brain  weights were
 attributed to reduced body weights and  were  not  considered toxic manifesta-
 tions  of  1,2,3-trlchloropropane.   Significantly  Increased  serum cholesterol
 levels  were noted 1n  females  at 1000 mg/l.   Mixed-function  oxldase activi-
 ties were  Increased  1n  both  sexes at  100 mg/l.   There were  no  statisti-
 cally   significant  effects  on  hematology.   Mild  hlstopathologlcal  lesions
 similar  to  those  observed   with  1,1,2-trlchloropropane  occurred  In  the
 livers,  kidneys  and   thyroids  of  both  sexes  at  1000  mg/l.   Lesions were
 more prevalent  and more  severe  than  those observed with 1,1,2-trlchloropro-
 pane and were more marked  and  occurred more frequently 1n males  than females.
'As   with  1,1,2-tr1chloropropane,  1000   mg/l   (113  mg/kg/day  In males;  149
 mg/kg/day   In females)  was a  LOAEL and  100  mg/l  (15.0  mg/kg/day  1n   males;
 17.6 mg/kg/day  In females)  was a NOAEL.
     The  NTP  (1983a,b)  performed  preliminary  subchronlc  120-day   gavage
 studies  with 1,2,3-trlchloropropane In  Fischer  344 rats and  B6C3F1  mice; a
 chronic  cancer  experiment  Is  still  In  progress  (NTP,  1986).   Treatment
 groups  contained 20 an1ma1s/sex/spec1es and  the  control groups contained 30
 an1ma1s/sex/spedes.   Controls  received  the  corn  oil  vehicle on  the same
 5-day/week  schedule  that  treated animals  received the   test  chemical  at 8,
 16,  32, 63,  125 or  250  mg/kg.  Parameters   of  toxkUy evaluated Included
 food consumption and  body  weight gain,  clinical  observations, and at  termi-
 nation,  gross  necropsy,  body and  organ  weights,, clinical blood  chemistry,
 hematology, limited  urlnalysls,  sperm count  and morphology, and hlstopatho-
 loglcal  examination.   In  addition, an  Interim sacrifice of  10  controls/sex/
 species  and one-half  of  the  animals 1n  each  test group was  performed after
 60   days   for   evaluation   of  clinical   chemistry,  hematology, urlnalysls,
 testlcular   and  ep1d1dymal  weights  and  gross  and  microscopic pathology.

 OOlld                                -27-                             04/10/87

-------
Extensive hlstopathologlcal examinations were performed  on  animals  that  died
or  were sacrificed  1n a  moribund  condition,  and  at  both  the 60-day  and
terminal sacrifices  on control  animals  of both  species  and  on rats at  125
mg/kg,  male  mice, at  125  and  250 mg/kg and  female mice at  250 mg/kg.   In
other  groups  of rats, hlstopathologlcal  examination was  limited  to selected
target  organs  at 63 mg/kg at  the  60-day  Interim sacrifice  and at  32 and 63
mg/kg  at  termination.  In other  groups  of mice,  hlstopathologlcal  examina-
tion at  termination  was  restricted to selected  target organs  of  males  at 32
and 63 mg/kg and of females at 16, 32, 63 and 125 mg/kg.
    In  the NTP (1983a)  study using rats,  all rats  at 250 mg/kg and one male
and  five  females  at  125  mg/kg died  from  renal and hepatic  toxldty.   Food
consumption  was  markedly  decreased  at  250  mg/kg, slightly decreased  In
females at 125 mg/kg, but  comparable with  controls  In  other  test groups.  A
decrease  1n  rate  of  body weight  gain,  resulting  1n significantly  reduced
terminal body  weights, was  marked 1n rats  of  both  sexes  at  125  mg/kg and
moderate 1n males  at  63 mg/kg.   Clinical  signs  Including a  transient hunched
and  thin  appearance  were  observed  1n all test  groups  early  1n  the  study.
These  signs  disappeared  In males  after  week  7 and  1n females  after  week 9.
Alopecia 1n  125 mg/kg males  and  63  mg/kg females  persisted  throughout the
study.
    The  liver  and  kidney  appeared  to  be   the  major  target, organs  for
1,2,3-tr1chloropropane.  A dose-related  statistically   significant Increase
1n  absolute  and  relative  liver  weights  occurred  1n  all  treated  groups of
males  and  1n  females at >16  mg/kg.  Significantly  elevated  relative kidney
weights occurred 1n both sexes  at  >32 mg/kg.   Relative  testlcular weight was
elevated at  both 60  and 120  days  and epldldymal  weight  was  decreased  at 60
days at 125  mg/kg, but there were  no effects  on sperm  count or morphology.


OOlld                               -28-                             05/12/87

-------
Biologically  and  statistically  significant  clinical  chemistry  alterations
reflected  hepatotoxldty  and Indicated greater  sensitivity 1n females  com-
pared with  males.   In  males, decreased BUN at  125  mg/kg  and  pseudochollnes-
terase activities at 63*and  125 mg/kg  were  observed at  both 60 and  120  days.
In  females,  elevated   S60T, SGPT  and  SDH  were  observed  at  125  mg/kg,
decreased  BUN was  noted  at  >32  mg/kg,  and  decreased  pseudochollnesterase
activity was  noted In  all  treated  groups  at  >8 mg/kg and at >16 mg/kg  at
termination.   There  appeared to  be few  other  differences between observa-
tions at 60 or 120 days.  Decreased erythrocyte  count,  hematocrU,  and  blood
hemoglobin  concentrations attributed  to  reduced erythropolesls was observed
1n rats  of  both  sexes  at  >16 mg/kg at both time points.   The  changes  at  16
and 32 mg/kg  at  termination, however,  seemed to have  little  biological  sig-
nificance.  There were  no  treatment-related effects  on  urlnalysls  parameters.
    Altered gross  appearance of  organs at  necropsy,  limited  to  the  stomach
and kidney,  were observed  only  In rats  that died  or  were  sacrificed  when
moribund.   Several necrotlc  and  degenerative hlstopathologlcal lesions  were
noted 1n the  liver, kidney and nasal  turblnates  of  rats of both sexes at 125
mg/kg  at  both  time  points.   Milder  lesions  1n  the  kidney   and  nasal
turblnates  were  observed  In both  sexes  at  63 mg/kg  at  60  and 120  days.
Minimal   renal  changes  were  observed  1n male  rats  1n  the 32  mg/kg group  at
termination.
    The  dosage of 8 mg/kg (5.7 mg/kg/day)  1s  designated a NOAEL,  although 1t
1s   associated  with   mild   clinical   signs   1n   both   sexes,   reduced
pseudochollnesterase  activity  1n   females  at   60  but   not   120  days,  and
Increased  relative  liver  weight  1n  males.   At this  dosage, the  clinical
signs were  transient,  having disappeared  by 7 weeks.   The elevated relative
liver weight  1n male rats may be  considered an adaptive  response since  there


OOlld                               -29-                             05/12/87

-------
was  no  functional  Impairment  Indicated  by  c!1n1copatholog1cal  tests and  no
morphological alteration Indicated by  h1stopatholog1cal  examination.  The  16
mg/kg  (11.4  mg/kg/day)  dose  may  be  considered  a  LOAEL  associated   with
chronically  depressed  psuedochollnesterase  values, which,  according to NTP
(1983a), 1n  the  absence  of known Inhibitors may represent  reduced  synthesis
that 1s due to hepatocellular damage.
    The mice  1n  the NTP  (1983b)  study  exhibited  fewer  signs of  toxldty than
did  rats  1n the NTP  (1983a)  study.   Treatment-related mortality (8  females
and  17  males)  occurred  only  1n  the  high-dose group,  and  appeared  to  be
related  to   hepatotoxldty   and  renal  toxldty.    Food   consumption was
unaffected  at <125 mg/kg  and  elevated 1n  males at  250 mg/kg.   Body weight
gains and  terminal  body  weights  were unaffected except  for  being reduced  In
surviving  250 mg/kg  males.    Clinical  signs  Including  a  thin  and  hunched
appearance, rough  fur  and  alopecia,  and sores on  the  genital  areas occurred
In  control  and  treated  groups;  a dose- or  treatment-related  trend  was  not
apparent.
    Reduced relative testlcular weight was  observed at  125  mg/kg and reduced
relative  epldldymal  weight  was   observed  at  32 and  125  mg/kg  (not  at  63
mg/kg) at the 60-day  sacrifice but  not  at  the 120-day sacrifice.  Results  of
the  sperm  studies  were  Inconclusive,  but  the lack of  testlcular lesions  at
either  the  60-  or 120-day  sacrifice  reduces  concern  that   the  decreased
testlcular and epldldymal  weights  observed  at  60 days  reflect  a biologically
significant change.   Although the absolute and relative weights of several
other organs  differed significantly  from  controls,  only  elevated absolute
and  relative  liver weights  at  >125  mg/kg  were accompanied by hlstopatho-
loglcal  change, suggesting biological significance.
001 Id                               -30-                             05/12/87

-------
    Although  there  were sporadic  significant  changes  1n clinical chemistry
and  hematologlcal   parameters  and  no  dose-related  response  was apparent,
these  changes   with   one   exception   were  not  attributed   to   treatment.
Decreased  BUN at >16  mg/kg In  females  was observed  at  60 but  not  at  120
days.   Clinical  chemistry  tests  were  hampered by  small   sample  size.  No
effects  were  reported  on  appearance  or  specific  gravity  of  urine.    There
were no  apparent effects on  gross  appearance at  necropsy.   Hlstopathologlcal
examinations  of  surviving  mice  revealed the  lung,  spleen, forestomach  and
esophagus  to  be  target  organs.   At the  60-day  sacrifice,  necrotlc  lesions
were noted 1n the  liver at  125  mg/kg  In  males and  250  mg/kg  1n females.
Regenerative  lesions   were   noted  1n  the  lungs  of  high-dose  females.
Hyperkeratosls was  observed  1n  the  forestomach  of males  at 125  and  250
mg/kg.    At  termination 1n  females,  liver lesions were  noted  at >125  mg/kg
and  changes  1n  the   bronchlolar  epithelium   and  hyperkeratosls   of  the
forestomach were observed  at  >63 mg/kg.   Splenic  lesions,  consisting of
slightly Increased  hematopolesis,  occurred In most  groups  of  both sexes at
>32 mg/kg.
    In  this  study,  63  mg/kg (45  mg/kg/day)  1n mice  1s  designated  a  LOAEL
associated  with  hlstopathologlcal  lesions In the bronchlolar  epithelium and
forestomach.  The minor and  transient depression  1n  BUN  at  >16 mg/kg  and the
slight extramedullary  hematopolesis observed  1n the  spleen at  >32 mg/kg are
not considered adverse; therefore,  32 mg/kg  (22.9 mg/kg/day)  1s considered  a
NOAEL.
                                                                   «
    6.1.2.2.   CHRONIC — Completed studies of  the chronic  oral  toxldty of
the  tMchloropropanes  could not  be located In  the  available  literature as
cited 1n Appendix A.   1,2,3-TMchloropropane  1s  undergoing  cancer testing 1n
a  NTP  gavage  study  1n  rats and mice  (NTP,   1986).   When completed, this
experiment  may provide useful chronic  toxldty data.

001 Id                               -31-                              05/12/87

-------
6.1.3.   Other Relevant Information.   In  a  series of  range-finding  experi-
ments using  male  Carworth-Hlstar rats, Smyth  et al.  (1954,  1962)  reported
oral  LD50  values   for  1,1,1-,  1,1,2- and  1,2,3-tMchloropropane  of  7.46
ml/kg,  1.23  g/kg  and  0.32  ml/kg,   respectively.    LD5Q  values  for  the
l,2,3-1somer  for  mice,  guinea pigs, rabbits and rats of 369,  340,  380 and
505 mg/kg  were  reported 1n  a  Russian  study  (Shcherban and PHen'ko, 1975),
but  the  route  of  administration was  not reported.   Sax  (1984)  and NIOSH
(1986) reported an oral LD5Q of 1230 mg/kg for  1,2,2-tMchloropropane.
    In a preliminary screening study of the anthelmlntlc efficacy of  several
chemicals,  Wright  and  Schaffer  (1932)   administered  single  0.2-0.5 mi/kg
oral  doses  of   1,2,3-tMchloropropane  to  three  dogs.    Complete  narcosis
occurred within  1.5  hours,  followed by  death within  2  days.  Severe liver
necrosis was observed during h1stopatholog1cal  examination of  all  three dogs.
    The acute  Inhalation  toxlclty  of the trlchloropropanes was  Investigated
1n an  experiment  1n  which groups of six  male  rats  were  exposed for  4 hours
(Smyth et  al.,  1954,  1962).   1,1,1-TMchloropropane at  8000  ppm (48 g/m3)
killed  four  of  six  rats,  1,1,2-trlchloropropane   at  2000  ppm  (12 g/m3)
killed  three  of six  rats and  1,2,3-tMchloropropane at 1000  ppm (6 g/m3)
killed  five of  six  rats.   In  a  similar experiment  using mice,  20-m1nute
exposures  to  1,2,3-tMchloropropane  at   30   mg/i   (30   g/m3)   killed   8/15
mice within  48  hours  and  an additional  4  mice within  10  days  (McOmle  and
Barnes,  1949).    Reducing  both  the  exposure  time  and   concentration  by
one-half resulted In the death of 7/10  mice exposed  for 10  days.
    Smyth  et  al.  (1954,   1962)  reported  dermal LDcgS  1n rabbits   of  >20,
14.1  and  1.77  ml/kg   for   the  1,1,1-,  1,1,2- and  1,2,3-1somers,  respec-
tively.    Following  oral,  Inhalation  or  dermal  exposure,  the  l,2,3-1somer
appears to  be most  toxic  and the  l,l,l-1somer  appears  to be  least  toxic.
OOlld                               -32-                             05/12/87

-------
These  Investigators also  scored  the  ability of the trlchloropropanes to  act
as  primary  skin  and  eye Irritants In rabbits on a scale of 1  (least  severe)
to  10  (most  severe).   For  skin  Irritation,  1,1,1-,  1,1,2- and  1.2,3-tM-
chloropropane  scored  4,  4  and   1,  respectively.   For  eye  Irritation  the
scores  were 2,  5 and  4.   McOmle  and  Barnes  (1949)  considered  1,2,3-trl-
chloropropane to be an Intense skin Irritant 1n rabbits.
    Ruth  (1986)   reported  that  1,2,3-tMchloropropane  has a  strong,  acrid
odor,  which 1s  Irritating  at  300 mg/m3.   Based  on  a  !5-m1nute  exposure,
the majority of  a group of  12 human subjects  (both sexes) predicted  that  50
ppm  (-300  mg/m3)  would   be  satisfactory  for an   8-hour   exposure.    All
subjects  found  exposure  to  100   ppm  (-600 mg/m3)  to be  Irritating  to  the
eyes and throat.
    The  liver  1s the major  target organ  for  1,2,3-tMchloropropane by  any
natural  route  of exposure.   In   order  to measure  the Interaction of  known
hepatotoxlcants  1n  producing  liver   toxIcHy,  Drew  et  al.  (1978)  exposed
groups  of  15  adult  male CD-I  rats  to  1,2,3-trlchloropropane .at  500  ppm
(-3000  mg/m3)  or 1,2-d1chloropropane  at   1000  ppm (-4600 mg/m3)  or to  the
mixture  at  the  same  concentrations  for  4 hours.   Hepatotoxlclty  was
evaluated by measuring  SGOT,  SGPT, serum  glucose-6-phosphatase  and serum OCT
periodically for  48  hours posttreatment.    SGOT, SGPT and  OCT  were  elevated
by exposure to each compound.  The effects  on  SGOT and OCT were additive and
the effect  on  SGPT  was  synerglstlc at 24  hours.   By  48  hours,  the effect on
SGOT, SGPT  and OCT  was  less than additive.  Neither  compound alone affected
glucose-6-phosphatase levels,  but the combination  caused  a reduction  In the
serum level of this  enzyme at 4  and  24 hours  after  treatment.   The Investi-
gators  concluded  that  there was  little evidence  that 1,2,3-trlchloropropane
and 1,2-dlchloropropane,  when combined,  had an additive effect on producing
liver damage.

OOlld                               -33-                             05/12/87

-------
6.2.   CARCINOGENICITY
6.2.1.   Inhalation.   Pertinent  data regarding  the carclnogenlclty  of  the
tMchloropropanes  by  Inhalation  could  not  be  located  1n  the  available
literature as cited 1n Appendix A.
6.2.2.   Oral.   1,2,3-Trlchloropropane  Is  undergoing chronic  testing In  an
NTP  gavage  study using  rats  and  mice  (NTP,  1986).  The  subchronlc  studies
are discussed 1n Section 6.1.2.1.
6.2.3.   Other   Relevant   Information.    Other   relevant   carclnogenlclty
Information  for  the trlchloropropanes  could  not be  located  In  the  available
literature as dted In Appendix A.
6.3.   MUTAGENICITY
    Hutagenldty  testing of  the  trlchloropropanes  has  been limited  to  the
1,2,3-lsomer.   Results of  several tests  In  prokaryotes and mammalian  test
systems are  presented  1n Table 6-1.   1,2,3-Trlchloropropane  was consistently
positive In  the  reverse mutation  test In  at  least  two  strains  of Salmonella
typh1mur1um.  Generally,  the  presence of  an  activating  system was required
for  a positive  result.   Results  1n mammalian  tests yielded mixed results.
Positive results were  obtained In viral  transformation  (Hatch et al., 1983).
sister chromatld exchange and mlcronucleus tests  (Douglas et  al.,  1985)  in
vitro, but negative  results were reported  for the  mlcronucleus  test  (Douglas
et  al.,  1985).   unscheduled  DNA  synthesis test  (Nlrsalls et al.,  1983)  and
dominant  lethal  test  (Sa1to-Suzuk1  et  al.,   1982)  in.  vivo.   It  should  be
noted  that  the  structurally-similar  compounds,  1,2,3-trlbromopropane  and
1,2-d1bromo-3-chloropropane   both   yielded    positive    responses    In   the
dominant-lethal  test  (Salto-Suzukl  et  al.,  1982).   The Interpretation  of
these mammalian  studies  Is  limited 1n  that all  but the dominant  lethal study
were  reported only  as  abstracts with no data,  and the  dominant  lethal study
was conducted using a  single dose.

001 Id                               -34-                              07/07/87

-------
                                                                          TABLE 6-1
o
o
«j
0.


1
a
i






07/07/8

Assay
Reverse
mutation


Enhancement
of viral
transformation
of DNA
Sister
chromattd
exchange
Hlcronucleus
test

Unscheduled
DNA synthesis
Dominant
lethal


Indicator
Organism
Salmonella
typhlmurlum
TA9B. TA100.
1A1535. TA1537
S. typhlmurlum
TA100
S. typhlmurlum
TA98. TA100
TA1535. TA1537
S. typhlmurlum
TA9B. TA100.
TA1535. TA1537
Syrian hamster
embryo cells

CHO cells

CHO cells
mouse bone
marrow
male rat
hepatocytes
SO rats

nuiag
Purity Application
NR plate
Incorporation
99* plate
Incorporation
99. IX prelncubatlon
NR plate
Incorporation
NR cell culture

NR cell culture

NR cell culture
t
NR In vivo

NR In vivo
(gavage)
>99X 5 days by
gavage In
olive oil

(eniciiy icsung or i.^.j-iricnl
Concentration Activating
or Dose System
NR ±S 9
1 or O.T tS-9
i«ol/plate
0-333 »S-9
i«ol/plate
0.5-5000 iS-9
tMol/plate
NR none

NR none

NR none
NR NA
NR NA
80 mg/kg/dose NA

oropropane
Response Comments
i Applied In DNSO 1:50;
negative In TA98
| Response was dose-related and
greater In presence of S-9
» Negative In TA9B. TA1537
» Negative In TA9B. TA1537
t Treatment enhanced transfor-
mation with SA7 virus

t Abstract only

» Abstract only
Abstract only
Abstract only
Structurally-related 1.2.3-
trlbromopropane and 1.2-dl-
bromo-3-chloropropane were
used as positive controls
single dose <20X of ID^o


Reference
Blomedtcal Testing
Laboratories Inc.,
1979
Stolzenberg and
Hlne. 1980
Haworth et al.,
1983
Ratpan and
Maumann. 1985
Hatch et al.. 1983

Douglas et al. .
1985

Douglas et al..
1985
Douglas et al. ,
1985
Nlrsalls et al..
1983
Salto-Suzukl
et al.. 1982

NR - Not reported;  NA -  not  applicable;  NC  •  no  comment

-------
6.4.   TERATOGENICITY
    The only  Investigation  of the developmental  toxldty  of  the tMchloro-
propanes  available  was   a   preliminary   study  with  1,2,3-tMchloropropane
(purity not  reported)  In Sprague-Oawley  rats.   Groups  of  10-15  mated rats
were  given  0 or  37  mg/kg/day In  corn  oil by  1ntraper1toneal  Injection  on
days 1-15 of gestation (Hardln et al., 1981).  This dosage  was determined as
the  MTD resulting 1n  no mortality,  no  marked signs  of  toxldty  and <10X
reduction  In  rate of  body  weight  gain  In  nonpregnant  females  treated  by
Intraperltoneal  Injection for  15  consecutive  days.   Dams were sacrificed on
gestation day  21  and  fetuses  were  examined  for  abnormalities  and  signs  of
fetal  toxldty.    In  treated  rats,  maternal  toxldty  was   manifested  as
statistically significantly  altered  absolute  or  relative  weights  of  two or
more organs.  There was no evidence  of fetal  toxldty or  teratogenlclty.
6.5.   OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS
    The  only study  available  regarding  the reproductive effects  of  the
tMchloropropanes  was   the  dominant   lethal   study   using   SO  rats  by
Salto-Suzukl et al.  (1982).  No effects on mating,  fertility or  hlstologlcal
appearance  of  the testes  were observed  1n  a  group  of  15 rats treated by
gavage  with  80  mg/kg  1,2,3-tMchloropropane  In  olive  oil  for  5 days.   The
structurally-related   chemical  1,2,3-tr1bromopropane  was  associated  with
reduced  fertility and  hlstopathologlcal  lesions  In  the  testes   1n this
study.  Similar lesions  were also observed with  1,2-d1bromo-3-chloropropane,
which was used as a positive control  In the dominant lethal test.
6.6.   SUMMARY
    Few  data  were  located   regarding  the Inhalation  toxldty  of  the  tM-
chloropropanes.    Several  Russian  studies  reported  the  effect of  l,2,3-tr1-
chloropropanes In rats  exposed  continuously  for  7 days  to  3 months.   The
liver  and  lungs   appeared  to be  the  target  organs  In  these studies,  which

001 Id                               -36-                             07/07/87

-------
reported  hlstopathologlcal  lesions  after exposure  to  2 mg/m3  for  3 months
(Sldorenko  et  al.,  1979; Tsulaya et  al.,  1977,  1979;  Bonashevskaya, 1977).
Lesions  were  not  reported  at  0.4  or  0.45   mg/m3.   Chronic   Inhalation
toxldty data were not located.
    Oral  toxldty  data  were  limited to  subchronlc  studies.   In  a  13-week
drinking  water  study  using  rats,  1,1,2- and  1,2,3-tr1chloropropane  were
administered to  both  sexes; and  1000 mg/8.  was  a LOAEL associated with mild
but  significant  lesions  1n  the liver,  lungs  and  thyroid.  The  100  mg/l
level  was  a   NOAEL  for  both  compounds.   Subchronlc  gavage  studies  were
performed with 1,2,3-trlchloropropane using rats (NTP, 1983a) and mice  (NTP,
1983b).   Rats   were  more   sensitive  than  mice,  as  Indicated  by   greater
mortality at 250 mg/kg,  the highest  dosage  tested.   The dosage  of  8  mg/kg,  5
days/week  (5.7 mg/kg/day)  In rats  was a  NOAEL associated with  transient
clinical  signs and  blood chemistry  alterations,  and elevated relative  liver
weight.  The next higher dosage,  16  mg/kg,  5  days/week  (11.4 mg/kg/day),  was
a  LOAEL  associated  with cllnlcopathologlcal  evidence  of  liver damage.   The
NOAEL  and  LOAEL  for  mice  were   32  and  63  mg/kg  (22.9  and  45.0  mg/kg/day).
respectively.
    Completed  carclnogenlcHy studies were  not located for  any of  the  tr1-
chloropropanes  by either oral or  Inhalation exposure.  The NTP  Is  evaluating
the  carclnogenlcHy of  1,2,3-trlchloropropane  by  gavage  In  rats and  mice
(NTP,  1986).   Data were not located  regarding  the  carclnogenlcHy of  the
trlchloropropanes  by  other  routes   of exposure.   Mutagen1c1ty  data   were
located  only  for the  1,2,3-lsomer.   Positive results  were  obtained 1n  the
reverse mutation test  In S. typhlmuMum.  Results In various mammalian test
systems were mixed.
OOlld                               -37-                             07/07/87

-------
    1,2,3-TMchloropropane  was not  associated  with fetotoxldty or  terato-
genlclty 1n an  1ntraper1toneal  study  1n rats (Hardln et al.,  1981}  and  had
no  effect   on  mating,  fertility  or  hlstomorphology  of  the   testes  In  a
dominant  lethal  study  using  rats  (Salto-Suzukl  et   al.,   1982).   Data
regarding   the   developmental   or  reproductive   toxldty   of  the  other
tMchloropropanes could not be located  1n  the  available  literature  as  dted
In Appendix A.
OOlld                               -38-                            07/07/87

-------
                     7.   EXISTING GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS
7.1.   HUMAN
    ACGIH  (1986a)  adopted  a TLV-TWA  of  50 ppm  (-300 mg/m3) for  l,2,3-tr1-
chloropropane.  A  STEL  of  75  ppm  (450 mg/m3)  was  also recommended.  ACGIH
(1986b)  recommended  that  the STEL  be  dropped  and  the TLV-TWA be  reduced  to
10  ppm  (-60  mg/m3),  based primarily on the NTP  (1983a,b)  oral  data on  rats
and mice 1n which  the dosage of 8  mg/kg for 5  days/week  was  a NOAEL  1n rats.
Assuming   equivalent  exposure   among  species,   human   Inhalation  of   10
m'/workday, a  human  body  weight   of  70  kg and  100%  absorption  of  Inhaled
chemical. ACGIH (1986b) estimated  an equivalent human  exposure  concentration
level of  -56 mg/m3  (9-10  ppm).    The  current  OSHA  (1985)  standard PEL  for
1,2,3-tMchloropropane  Is 50 ppm  (300  mg/m3).
    U.S. EPA  (1986b) verified  an  RfO  of 6 yg/kg/day  or  0.4 mg/day  for  a  70
kg  human  for 1,2,3-tr1chloropropane  based on  a  NOAEL  of  5.7  mg/kg/day  In
rats 1n the NTP  (1983a)  study (Sections 8.2.2.1. and  8,2.2.2.).
7.2.   AQUATIC
    Guidelines  and  standards for  the protection  of  aquatic organisms  from
the  effects  of  tMchloropropanes  could  not  be   located  In  the  available
literature as cited 1n  Appendix A.
OOlld                               -39-                             05/12/87

-------
                             8.  RISK ASSESSMENT
8.1.   CARCINOGENICITY
8.1.1.   Weight of Evidence.  A  gavage  study  with 1,2,3-tMchloropropane 1n
rats  and  mice 1s  1n  progress  (NTP, 1986).   No studies by  other routes of
exposure were  located  that  contribute  to  the  quantitative  evaluation of the
cardnogenlcHy of the trlchloropropanes  to animals.   Results of mutagenlc-
Hy tests  with 1,2,3-tMchloropropane,  positive 1n S. typh1mur1u'm and mixed
In  mammalian  test  systems,  suggest that  this  chemical  may be carcinogenic.
However,  most of  the  mammalian mutagenldty  data  are  available  only In
abstract  form.  Neither  human  case reports nor epldemlologlcal studies  were
located  regarding  the  trlchloropropanes.  According  to   the  guidelines of
U.S.   EPA   (1986c),   all   trlchloropropane  Isomers  and  all  mixtures  of
trlchloropropane Isomers are Included  In EPA Group 0 - not  classified.
8.1.2.   Quantitative  Risk  Estimates.    The   lack  of  data   regarding   the
carclnogenldty  of any • of  the  trlchloropropanes precludes  estimation of
carcinogenic potency for Inhalation or  oral exposure.
8.2.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
8.2.1.   Inhalation Exposure.
    8.2.1.1.   LESS THAN  LIFETIME  EXPOSURES  (SUBCHRONIC)  — Data  regarding
subchronlc  Inhalation  exposures  are   limited  to  several  Russian  reports
concerning  1,2,3-trlchloropropane   (see   Section  6.1.1.1.).    Experiments
lasting up  to  3 months (Sldorenko et al.t  1979;  Tsulaya et al.,  1977,  1979;
Bonashevskaya, 1977)  Investigated continuous exposure of rats  to  atmospheric
concentrations of  0.2-800  mg/m3.  Although 1t  was reported that  there  were
no  effects  on  rate of body weight gain or  hematology at the  highest concen-
tration  tested,   hlstopathologlcal  lesions  1n  the  "liver  and  lungs  were
reported  at  2  mg/m3.   ACGIH  (1986b)  dismissed  these Russian  reports as
•not  entirely  consistent*  with   the NTP  (1983a,b)  gavage  studies  using  rats

OOlld                               -40-                             07/07/87

-------
and  mice.  In  which  8  mg/kg,  5  days/week  was  a  NOAEL  1n  rats,  the  more
sensitive  species.   Primarily because the Russian  studies were  Incompletely
reported  and  because It  1s  not possible  to critically evaluate either  the
experimental  method  or  the   results,  these  studies  are  judged   to   be
Inadequate  for quantitative risk assessment; and a  subchronlc  Inhalation  RfO
1s not derived for any of the tMchloropropanes.
    8.2.1.2.   CHRONIC   EXPOSURES ~  Chronic   Inhalation   studies   of   the
trlchloropropanes could  not be  located In  the available literature as  cited
1n  Appendix A.   ACGIH  (1986a)  recommends  a TLV  of 50 ppm  (300 mg/m3)  for
occupational exposure to the  1,2,3-1somer.   In the  most recent ACGIH  (1986b)
documentation, based  on the  NTP  (1983a)  study using  rats,  a change  In  the
TLV-TWA to  10 ppm  (-60  mg/m3)  Is proposed  to protect against damage  to  the
liver and  kidneys,  known target organs  for  this  compounds.   In  the  absence
of  adequate  chronic  or  subchronlc   Inhalation  data,  the  current  and  the
proposed  TLV-TUAs   are  considered  Inadequate  to  serve as  the   basis  of  a
chronic Inhalation  RfD.  Therefore,  no  chronic  Inhalation  RfOs   are  derived
for any of the trlchloropropanes.
8.2.2.   Oral  Exposure.
    8.2.2.1.   LESS THAN  LIFETIME  EXPOSURES  (SUBCHRONIC) ~  Subchronlc  oral
data were  located  for  1,1,2- and 1,2,3-tMchloropropane.   Vllleneuve  et  al.
(1985) administered  0,  1, 10,  100  or  1000  mg of  1,1,2-tr1chloropropane In
drinking water to rats  for 13 weeks.   H1ld  but  significant  hlstopathologlcal
lesions 1n  the  liver,  kidneys  and  thyroid  were  observed at 1000 mg/i  but
not at  100 mg/l.   The  NOAEL of 100 mg/l,  equivalent to  dally dosages of
15.0 mg/kg  In males and 20.3  mg/kg  In females,  1s  an appropriate basis for a
subchronlc oral RfO.  Choosing  the higher  NOAEL of  20.3 mg/kg/day In females
and applying an  uncertainty factor of 100  (10  for  Interspedes extrapolation


OOlld                               -41-                             05/12/87

-------
and  10  to protect unusually  sensitive  Individuals)  results In a  subchronlc
oral  RfD  for 1,1,2-tr1chloropropane of 0.2  mg/kg/day  or  14 mg/day for a  70
kg  human.   Confidence 1n this  study  Is  high,  the database low and this  RfO
medium  because  the  cardnogenlclty  and  developmental   toxldty of  this
chemical have not been tested.
     VUleneuve  et al.   (1985)  also  administered  1,2,3-tr1chloropropane  to
rats  In drinking  water  at  0,  1,  10,  100  or  1000 mg/i  for  13  weeks.   At
1000  mg/l,  lesions similar  to  but  more severe than those  observed with  the
1,1,2-lsomer  were  observed  1n  the  liver,  kidney  and  thyroid.   Lesions  were
not  observed  at  100 mg/l   (15.0  mg/kg/day  In  males,  17.6  mg/kg/day  In
females),  which  was  considered  a  NOAEL.   Effects   observed  at  100  mg/l
Included  reduced  water  Intake and altered relative liver  and  kidney  weights
In  females.
     The NTP  performed 120-day  gavage  studies  with  1,2,3-tr1ch1oropropane 1n
.rats  (NTP,  1983a) and mice  (NTP,  1983b).  Animals were  treated  5 days/week
at  0,  8,  16, 32, 63, 125 or  250  mg/kg.  Mice appeared to  be  less sensitive
than  rats,  since mortality  occurred  only In the high-dose group.  In mice,
biologically  significant  alterations  1n relative  organ weights were observed
at  >125 mg/kg, along  with hlstopathologlcal  lesions  1n the liver, kidney and
stomach.   Lesions   In   the   bronchlolar   epithelium  and  forestomach  were
observed  1n  females  at  >63  mg/kg.   The 32 mg/kg dosage  (22.9 mg/kg/day) Is
designated a  NOAEL associated with a  transient depression  1n  BUN at  60 days
but  not at  termination  and  a  slight  Increase  1n  splenic (extramedullary)
hematopolesis In the absence of significant hematologlcal effects.
     In  rats,  mortality  occurred at 125 and  250 mg/kg  (NTP, 1983a).  Lesions
were  observed  1n the liver  and kidneys at  125 mg/kg  and  1n  the kidneys of
OOlld                               -42-                             05/12/87

-------
males  at  >32 mg/kg.   Cl1n1copatholog1cal  data (reduced BUN and  pseudcholln-
esterase  activity)  suggest  Impaired  liver  function  at  >16 mg/kg,  particu-
larly  In  females.  The 8 mg/kg  dosage  (5.7  mg/kg/day)  was  designated a  NOAEL
associated  with  transient  clinical   signs  1n   both  sexes   and   Increased
relative  liver  weight In  males.  The  16 mg/kg  (11.4 mg/kg/day)  dosage  1s
regarded a LOAEL.
    The NOAEL of  5.7  mg/kg/day  from the NTP  (1983a)  study  using rats  1s  the
only NOAEL below  which adverse  effects have  not  been  observed and  1s  chosen
as the  basis  of  a subchronlc oral RfD  for  1,2,3-tr1chloropropane.   Applying
an uncertainty  factor of  100  (10 for  Interspedes  extrapolation  and  10  to
protect unusually sensitive  Individuals) results  In an  RfD  of  0.06  mg/kg/day
of 4 mg/day  for  a 70 kg human.  The  confidence  In the study  1s  considered
high  and  1n  the  database  low.   The  cardnogenlcHy  and   developmental
toxlclty of this compound have  not yet  been tested  adequately.  Confidence 1n
the RfD. Is rated medium.
    Data  regarding  the  subchronlc oral  toxlclty  of  other  trlchloropropanes
or mixtures  of  trlchloropropanes were  not  located;  1t Is Inappropriate  to
derive RfDs by analogy to 1,1,2- or  1,2,3-tr1chloropropane.
    8.2.2.2.    CHRONIC EXPOSURES  — Chronic  oral  data  were not  located  for
any of  the trlchloropropanes.   An NTP chronic gavage  study In  rats  and mice
1s 1n progress, but results  are not  yet available (NTP, 1986).  Chronic oral
RfDs can  be  estimated for  1,1,2- and 1,2,3-trlchloropropane by applying an
additional uncertainty  factor  of 10  to  the  subchronlc oral  RfDs  estimated
from the  subchronlc studies  (see  Section  8.2.2.1.).   The subchronlc oral RfD
for  1,1,2-tr1chloropropane  was  0.2  mg/kg/day,   based on  a   NOAEL  of  20.3
mg/kg/day  (Vllleneuve et al.,  1985).   The chronic  oral RfD  for  1,1,2-trl-
chloropropane, therefore,  Is 0.02 mg/kg/day or 1 mg/day  for  a 70  kg human.


OOlld                               -43-                             05/12/87

-------
Confidence In  this  RfD  Is  rated medium  for  the  reasons  discussed  1n Section
8.2.2.1.   For  1,2,3-tr1chloropropane,   the   subchronlc   oral  RfD  was  0.06
mg/kg/day based on application  of  an  uncertainty factor  of 100 to a NOAEL of
5.7 mg/kg/day.  The  chronic oral  RfD  for  1,2,3-tr1chloropropane,  therefore,
1s  6  yg/kg/day or  0.4  mg/day  for a  70  kg  human.  A  confidence  level  of
medium  Is assigned   to  this  RfD  as  discussed  1n  Section  8.2.2.1.   This
analysis  reflects  the U.S. EPA  (1986b)  analysis for 1,2,3-tMchloropropane.
For  reasons   discussed  previously,  this  RfO  1s  not applied  to  the  other
Isomers or mixtures of Isomers of trlchloropropane.
OOlld                               -44-                              05/12/87

-------
                           9.   REPORTABLE  QUANTITIES
9.1.   BASED ON SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
    Tox1c1ty studies  with  the tMchloropropanes Include the  Russian  Inhala-
tion  studies (Tsulaya  et  al., 1977, 1979; Bonashevskaya and  Belyaeva,  1975;
Bonashevskaya,   1977;   Bonashevskaya  et  al.,  1978;  Belyaeva  et  al.,  1977;
Tarasova, 1975; Shalpak, 1976; Sldorenko  et al., 1979)  briefly summarized  In
Section  6.1.1.1.    In  these   studies,  rats  were  exposed  continuously  to
1,2,3-tr1chloropropane for 1  week to 3 months at concentrations  ranging from
0.2-800  mg/m3.   These reports  associated  hlstopathologlc   lesions  1n  the
liver  with  exposure  to   2   mg/m3.   The ACGIH  (1986b)  noted  that  these
reports  were   Inconsistent  with  the  results  of  the  NTP  (1983a,b)  studies
using  rats  and  mice,  and  dismissed  the  Russian  studies  from  further
consideration  In  derivation   of  a  TLV.   As noted  1n Chapter  8,  the  Russian
studies  were   Insufficiently  reported  for critical  evaluation and were  not
considered  In  the  derivation of Inhalation  R'fDs.   Because  of  the  lack  of
confidence  1n  these reports,  they  are not  considered In the  derivation  of
toxiclty-based  RQs.
    Subchronlc   oral  tox1c1ty data for   the  1,1,2- and  1,2,3-lsomers  are
summarized  In  Tables  9-1  and  9-2,  respectively.  For  the  1,1,2-1somer, mild
histologic,  biochemical  and   organ  weight  changes   were  observed  at  1000
mg/i  1n  rats   1n  a 13-week drinking water study.    CSs  for  1,1,2-tr1chloro-
propane  are presented 1n  Table  9-3.   For  both  males  and females,  the mild
lesions  observed   1n  liver,  kidney and  spleen were assigned  an  RV   of  5.
The higher  RV. calculated for  the males  reflects  the substantially  lower
dosage consumed by the males  In this  experiment.   The  CS of  11.  which was
associated  with hlstopathologlcal  lesions In  male rats, Is  chosen to  repre-
sent  the chronic  toxldty of 1,1,2-tr1chloropropane  since   1t  1s  slightly
higher than the CS of 10.5 for females.

OOlld                               -45-                             05/12/87

-------
                                                    TABLE 9-1
     Toxlclty Summary for 1,1,2-Trlchloropropane  (99X Pure)  In a  13-Heek Drinking Mater  Experiment  In Ratsa-b
o
CL
Average
Sex Body Weight
Male 0.301
0.301
0.301
0.301
0.301
i
Female 0.177
0.177
0.177
0.177
0.177
Exposure
0 •
1
10
100
1000

0
1
10
100'
1000
Transformed
Animal Dose
(mg/kg/day)c
0
0.15
1.5
15.0
150

0
0.20
2.0
20.3
203
Equivalent
Human/Dose
(rag/kg/day)d
0
0.02
0.24
2.4
24.4

0
0.03
0.27
2.77
27.7
Response
no effects
no effects
no effects
no effects
biochemical and mild
change, organ weight

no effects
no effects
no effects
no effects
biochemical and mild
change, organ weight





hlstologlcal
changes





hlstologlcal
changes
   aSource:  Vllleneuve et  al..  1985
2  D10 weanling Sprague-Dawley  rats/sex/group
0  Estimated from data provided by  Investigators
GO
   dCalculated by multiplying  transformed  animal  dose by the cube  root  of the ratio of  the  animal  to human
    (70 kg)  body  weight.

-------
Oral loxlclty Summary for 1,2.3-TrIchloropropane
•^
Q. Species/
Strain
Rat/Sprague-
Oawley




i Rat/Sprague-
5 Dawley
i



Rat/f Ischer
r-344

O
•t*
•v.
O.
•^
CO
Sex
H
H
N
N
N
f
f
f
r
f
H
N
N

No. at
Start
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
30
20
20

Average
Height
(kg)
0.301
0.301
0.301
0.301
0.241
0.177
0.177
0.177
0.170
0.151
0.33
0.33
0.33

Vehicle/
Physical
State
drinking
water
drinking
water
drinking
water
drinking
water
drinking
water
drinking
water
drinking
water
drinking
water
drinking
water ,
drinking
water
corn oil
corn oil
corn oil

Purity
NA
99X
99X
99X
99X
NA
99X
99X
99X
99X
NA
>99X
>99X

Exposure
0 mg/l for 13 weeks
1 mg/l for 13 weeks
10 *g/t for 13 weeks
100 mg/l for 13 weeks
1000 mg/t for 13 weeks
0 «g/l for 13 weeks
1 mg/t for 13 weeks
10 mg/» for 13 weeks
100 mg/t for 13 weeks
1000 mg/» for 13 weeks
0 mg/kg. S days/week.
for 120 days
6 mg/kg. S days/week
for 120 days
16 mg/kg. 5 days/week
for 120 days
,
Transformed
Anlnal Dose
(•g/kg/day)
0
0.15a
1.5a
15. Oa
113a
0
0.20^
2.0a
17. 6a
149a
0
5-'
11.4

Transformed .
Hunan Oosed
(•g/kg/day)
0
0.02
0.24
2.44
17.1
0
0.03
0.27
2.37
19.3
0
1.0
1.9

Response
NA
No adverse treatment -
related effects
No adverse treatment-
related effects
No adverse treatment -
related effects
Biochemical and hlsto-
logtc changes, organ
weight changes
NA
No adverse treatment-
related effects
No adverse treatment -
related effects
No adverse treatment-
related effects
Biochemical and hlsto-
loglc changes, organ
weight changes
NA
Elevated relative
liver weight
Elevated relative
liver weight

Reference
VIDeneuve
et al.. 1985
Vllleneuve
et al.. 1985
Vllleneuve
el al.. 1985
Vllleneuve
et al.. 1985
Vllleneuve
et al.. 1965
Vllleneuve
et al.. 1985
Vllleneuve
et al.. 1985
Vllleneuve
et al.. 1985
Vllleneuve
et al.. 1985
Vllleneuve
et al.. 1985
NTP. 1983a
NTP. 1983a
NTP. 1983a


-------
TABLE 9-2 (conl.)
§ Species/
^ Strain
0.
Rat/flscher
f-344



Rat/flscher
f-344

i
00


Mouse/B6C3M


o
•^
o
CO
Sex
M
M
M
M
f
f
f
f
f
f
r
N
M
M
M

No. at
Start
20
20
20
20
30
20
20
20
20
20
20
30
20
20
20

Average
Weight
(kg)
0.33
0.32
0.275
NAb
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.15
NA°
0.029
0.029
0.029
0.029

Vehicle/
Physical
State
corn oil
corn oil
corn oil
corn oil
corn oil
corn oil
corn oil
corn oil
corn oil
corn oil
*
corn oil
corn oil
corn- oil
corn oil
corn oil

Purity
>99X
>99X
>99X
>99X
NA
>99X
>99X
>99X
>99X
>99X
>99X
NA
>99Xe
>99XC
>99XC

Exposure
32 ag/kg, 5 days/week
for 120 days
63 ag/kg. 5 days/week
for 120 days
125 ag/kg. 5 days/week
for 120 days
250 ag/kg. 5 days/week11
0 ag/kg. 5 days/week.
for 120 days
8 ag/kg. 5 days/week
for 120 days
16 ag/kg. 5 days/week
for 120 days
32 ag/kg. 5 days/week
for 120 days
63 ag/kg. 5 days/week
for 120 days
125 ag/kg. 5 days/week
for 120 days
250 ag/kg. 5 days/week0
0 ag/kg. 5 days/week.
for 120 days
8 ag/kg. 5 days/week
for 120 days
16 ag/kg. 5 days/week
for 120 days
32 ag/kg. 5 days/week
for 120 days

Transforaed
Anlaal Dose
(ag/kg/day)
22.9
45.0
89.3
179
0
5.7
11.4
22.9
45.0
89.3
179
0
5.7
11.4
22.9

Transforaed
Human Oosea
(mg/kg/day)
3.8
7.5
14.1
NAD
0
0.8
1.6
3.2
6.4
11.5
NAD
0
0.42
0.85
1.71

Response
Elevated relative
liver weight
Liver damage, at Id
lesions
Mortality, severe
lesions
Mortality
NA
Mild biochemical
changes
Altered biochemistry
Altered biochemistry
Liver damage, mild
hlstopathologlc lesions
Mortality, severe
hlstopathologlc lesions
Mortality
NA
No definite treatment-
related adverse effects
No definite treatment-
related adverse effects
Mild splenic lesions

Reference
NTP.
NTP.
NTP.
NTP.
NTP.
NTP.
NTP.
NTP.
NTP.
NTP.
NTP.
NTP.
NTP.
NTP.
NTP.

1983a
1983a
1983a
1983a
1983a
1983a
1983a
1983a
1983a
1983a
1983a
19B3b
1983b
19B3b
1983b


-------
1ABII 9-2"[conl.)
g Species/ No. at Average Vehicle/ Transformed
— • Strain Sex Start Height Physical Purity Exposure Animal Dose
^ (kg) State (mg/kg/day)
Mouse/B6C3fl N 20 0.029 corn oil >99XC 63 mg/kg. 5 days/week 45.0
for 120 days
M 20 0.029 corn oil >99XC 125 mg/kg. 5 days/week 89.3
for 120 days
N 20 0.029 corn oil >99XC 250 mg/kg. 5 days/week 179
for 120 days i
Nouse/B6C3Fl F 30 0.023 corn oil NA 0 mg/kg. 5 days/week. 0
for 120 days
F 20 0.023 corn oil >99XC B mg/kg. 5 days/week 5.7
for 120 days
F 20 0.023 corn oil >99XC 16 .mg/kg. 5 days/week 11.4
for 120 days
, F 20 0.023 corn oil >99XC 32 mg/kg. 5 days/week 22.9
4* for 120 days
^O
F 20 0.023 corn oil >99XC 63 mg/kg. 5 days/week 45.0
for 120 days
F 20 0.023 corn oil >99XC 125 mg/kg. 5 days/week 89.3
for 120 days
F 20 0.023 corn oil >99XC 250 mg/kg. 5 days/week 179
> for 120 days
^Estimated from data provided by Investigators.
DA11 animals died within first 5 weeks of experiment.
cBased on analysis of test chemical of same lot number reported by NTP (1983a).
NA = Not applicable
o
4^
^^
^k»
O
^^
0°
Transformed
Human Oosea Response
(mg/kg/day)
3.35 Nlld splenic lesions
6.66 lesions In liver.
stomach
13.3 Mortality
0 NA
0.39 No definite treatment-
related adverse effects
0.79 No definite treatment-
related adverse effects
1.58 Nlld splenic lesions
3.11 Lesions In stomach
and lungs
6.16 Lesions tn liver
12.4 Mortality







Reference
NTP. 19836
NTP. 19836
NTP. 19836
NTP. 19836
NTP. 19836
NTP. 19836
NTP. 19836
NTP. 19836
NTP. 19836
NTP. 19836








-------
                                                    TABLE 9-3


                           Oral  Composite  Scores  for  1.1.2-Trlchloropropane  Using  Rats3
' ft
Sex Animal Dose
(rog/kg/day)
i
o Hale 150
Female 203
Chronic
Human NED
(rag/day)b
171
194

RVd
2.2
2.1

Effect RVe CS
mild hlstopatho- 5 11
logic lesions
mild hlstopatho- 5 10.5
logic lesions

RQ
1000
1000
   aSource:  Vlllcneuve et  al..  1985  ,


   bAn  uncertainty  factor  of  10 was  applied  to expand  from  subchronlc  to chronic exposure.
o
•—
CO

-------
    Subchronlc oral  toxIcHy  studies  with  1,2,3-tMchloropropane  Include  the
drinking  water  study   1n  rats  (VUleneuve  et  al.,  1985)  and  the  gavage
studies  1n  rats  and mice  (NTP,  1983a,b)  (see  Table  9-2).   Data  were  not
available  from  oral  or  Inhalation  developmental  toxlclty  or  reproductive
toxldty  studies.   Generally,  the effects  observed  1n  the oral  studies  and
their  associated  RV s  were  mortality  (RV =10),   severe  degenerative   or
hyperplastlc   hlstopathologlc   lesions   (RV =8),   mild   cellular   changes
(RV =5),  organ   weight  changes   (RV =4)   and   biochemical   evidence   of
Impaired  organ  function  (RV =6).   Table 9-4  presents  CSs  for each  of  these
effects.  When  a given  effect  was observed  at  more than  one dosage or  1n
more than one species or  sex,  the  CS  for that  effect was calculated  only  for
the data  point for which  the  lowest human  equivalent dose  was  calculated.   A
CS was  not  calculated  for  severe  hlstopathologlc effects  because they were
observed  only  at  dosages   associated  with  mortality.    CSs  ranged from
17.2-26.4, which correspond to RQs of '100 or  1000.   It  1s  apparent  that rats
exposed by gavage develop more serious  effects at lower dosages  than do rats
exposed by  drinking water.    Rats  appear  to be  more sensitive than  mice  to
the  oral  effects  of  1,2,3-tMchloropropane.   The highest   CS,  26.4,  was
associated with  biochemical evidence  of  Impaired  liver  function 1n  female
rats (NTP,  1983a)-.   This value 1s  chosen  to represent the  chronic  toxldty
of 1,2,3-tMchloropropane.
    The CSs chosen  for the 1,1,2- and  1,2,3-1somers are   presented  In Table
9-5 and 9-6,  respectively.   Data  were not  sufficient  for  calculation of  CSs
for the  other tMchloropropane Isomers  or mixtures of  the Isomers.   It  1s
Inappropriate to adopt  the  CS  for  either 1,1,2-  or  1,2,3-tr1chloropropane as
the CS for the other Isomers or for mixtures  of Isomers.
OOlld                               -51-                             05/12/87

-------
o
o
                                                    TABLE 9-4


                                Oral Composite Scores for 1,2.3-Trlchloropropane
Species/Sex
Rat/female
i
7* Mouse/female
Rat/male
Rat/female
*An uncertainty
o
•**
o
CO
Chronic
Animal Dose Human NED
(mg/kg/day) (rog/day)*
89.3 80.6
22.9 11.1
5.7 6.7
5.7 5.7
factor of 10 was applied



RVd Effect RVe CS RQ
2.6 Mortality 10 26 100
3.9 Mild hlstopathologlc 5 19.5 1000
lesions
4.3 Organ weight changes 4 17.2 1000
4.4 Biochemical evidence 6 26.4 100
of Impaired liver
function
to expand from subchronlc to chronic exposure.

•

Reference
NTP. 1983a
NTP. 1983b
NIP. 1983a
NTP. 1983a





-------
                                  TABLE 9-5
                            1,1,2-TMchloropropane
          Minimum Effective Dose (MED) and Reportable Quantity (RQ)


Route:                  oral
Dose*:                  171  mg/day
Effect:                 mild hlstopathologlc  lesions
Reference:               Vllleneuve  et  al.,  1985
RVd:                    2.2
RVe:                    5
Composite Score:         11
RQ:                     1000
'Equivalent human dose
OOlld                               -53-                             04/10/87

-------
                                   TABLE 9-6
                            1,2,3-TMchloropropane
           Minimum Effective  Dose  (MED) and Reportable Quantity  (RQ)


Route:                  oral
Dose*:                  5.7 mg/day
Effect:                 biochemical evidence of Impaired liver function
Reference:              NTPt  1983a
RVd:                    4.4
RVe:                    6                        •
Composite Score:        26.4
RQ:                     100
'Equivalent human, dose
0011d                               -54-                             04/10/87

-------
9.2.   BASED ON CARCINOGENICITY
    As  noted  In  Section  6.1.,  there  were  no  studies of  the carcinogenic
potency  of  any  of  the  tMchloropropanes  by  any route  of administration.
Because  of  the  lack of animal  data  and  because ep1dem1olog1c  data were not
located,  these  compounds were assigned an  EPA  classification  of  D:   not
classifiable as  to  human carcinogenic potency.   Data  were Insufficient for
estimation  of  an F factor.   Since  these compounds  are  classified  In EPA
Group  D,  no hazard  ranking  can be performed and  no  RQ for cardnogenldty
can be assigned.
OOlld                               -55-                             07/07/87

-------
                               10.  REFERENCES

ACGIH  (American  Conference of Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).   1986a.
TLVs: Threshold  L1mH  Values  and Biological  Exposure Indices for  1986-1987.
Adopted  by  ACGIH  with  Intended  changes  for  1986-1987.   Cincinnati,  OH.
p. 32.

ACGIH  (American  Conference of Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).   1986b.
Documentation  of  the   Threshold  Limit  Values,  5th  ed.   Cincinnati,  OH.
p. 601-602.

Belyaeva, N.N., V.R. Tsulaya, T.L. Marshak and  V.Y.  Brodsk11.   1974.   Effect
of  1,2,3-tr1chloropropane  on the  ploldy of  rat  hepatocytes.  Byull.  Eksp.
B1ol. Med.  78(12): 74-77.   (CA  082:133673H)

Belyaeva,  N.N.,  T.I.  Bonashevskaya, T.L.  Marshak  and V.Y.  Brodskll.   1977.
Study of  the effect of  some  chlorinated hydrocarbons on  the composition  of
rat  liver  hepatocyte  populations.   Byull.  Eksp. B1ol. Med.   83(3):  345-348.
(Russian with English translation)

B1omed1cal Testing  Laboratories, Inc.   1979.   Mutagenlclty  Testing,  Monthly
Report, Submitted  to NIOSH under Contract  No.  210-76-0153.   August  15,  1979
(unpaglnated).  (CUed 1n Franklin Research Center, 1981)

Bonashevskaya, T.I.  1977.   Morphological  characteristics of  the adaptation
of  the  liver  to  the effect  of  some chemical  substances.  Gig.  Sanlt.   4:
45-50.  (Russian with English translation)
001 Id                               -56-                             05/12/87

-------
Bonashevskaya, T.I.  and  N.N. Belyaeva.  1975.  Structural  and  hlstochemlcal
changes  1n  the  liver  1n exposure  to  a series of  aromatic and  halogenated
hydrocarbons.  Gig. Sanlt.  6: 111-112.  (Russian  with English  translation)

Bonashevskaya, T.I., V.R. Tsulaya, V.V. Zykova, N.B.  Kumpan and  V.V.  Shalpak.
1978.   Effect  of chlorine derivatives  of  propane and ethylene on white  rat
lungs.  Subacute experiment.  Deposited Doc.   ISS VINITI  1733-78:  11  p.   (CA
91:187533v)

Dewalle,  F.B.  and  E.S.K. Chlan.   1978.  Presence of trace organlcs  In  the
Delaware  River  and  their  discharge  by  municipal   and   Industrial  sources.
Proc. Ind. Waste Conf.   32:  908-919.

D1ll1ng,  H.L.   1977.   Interphase transfer processes.  II.  Evaporation rates
of  chloroetha'nes,  ethanes;  ethylenes,  propanes,  and propylenes  from dilute
aqueous solutions.   Comparisons  with theoretical  predictions.   Environ.  Scl.
Technol.  11(4): 405-409.

Douglas,  G.R.,  E.R.  Nestmann,  E.  Lee, R.  Marshall  and  J.A. Heddle.  1985.
How well  do  jji vitro tests  predict  in  vivo  genotoxlclty.  Environ.  Mutagen.
7(3): 31.  (Abstract)

Dow Chemical  Company.   1985.  Allyllcs the  allyl chloride  family  of Inter-
mediates.  Dow Chemical Co., Midland, MI.

Drew,  R.T.,  J.M.  Patel  and  F.N.  Lin.  1978.  Changes  1n  serum  enzymes  1n
rats  after  Inhalation  of  organic  solvents  singly  and  1n  combination.
Toxlcol. Appl. Pharmacol.  45(3): 809-819.

OOlld                                -57-                              04/10/87

-------
 Elsenrelch,  S.J.,  B.8.  Looney and  J.D.  Thornton.  1981.   Airborne organic
 contaminants  In  the  Great  Lake  Ecosystem.   Environ.  Sc1.  Technol.  15(1):
 30-38.

 Franklin Research Center.  1981.   TMchloropropanes.  ISS NIOSH-210-79-0091;
 Order No.  PB83-112870.   91  p.

 Hardln,  B.O.,  G.P.  Bond,  M.R.  S1kov,  P.O. Andrew.  R.P.   Bellies  and  R.W.
 N1eme1er.   1981.   Testing of  selected  workplace chemicals  for teratogenlc
 potential.   Scand.  J. Work Environ.  Health.   7(4): 66-75.

.Hatch,  G.,  T. Anderson,  E.  Elmore  and S. Nesnow.  1983.  Status of enhance-
 ment of  DNA viral transformation  for determination of mutagenlc and carcino-
 genic potential  of  gaseous  and  volatile compounds.  Environ.  Mutagen.   5:
 422.  (Abstract)

 Hawley,  G.G.    1981.   The  Condensed  Chemical  Dictionary,  10th   ed.    Van
 Nostrand Relnhold Co.,  New York.  p.  1043.

 Haworth, S.,  T.  Lawlor,  K.   Hortelmans,  W.  Speck  and  E.  Zelger.    1983.
 Salmonella  mutaqen1c1ty  test  results for 250  chemicals.    Environ. Mutagen.
 5(1): 3-142.

 Hutchlnson,  T.C..  J.A.  Hellebust,  D. Tarn,  0.  Hackay,  R.A. Mascarenhas  and
 W.Y. Sh1u.   1980.  The  correlation  of the toxldty to  algae  of  hydrocarbons
 and   halogenated   hydrocarbons   with  their   physical-chemical  properties.
 Environ. Sc1. Res.  16:  577-586.
 001 Id                                -58-                              04/10/87

-------
Ivanetlch,  K.M.,  S.   Lucas,  J.A.  Marsh,  M.R.  Z1man,  I.D.  Katz  and  J.J.
Bradshaw.  1978.   Organic  compounds.   Their  Interaction  with  and  degradation
of  hepatic  mlcrosomal  drug-metabolizing  enzymes  jjn  vitro.   Drug  Metab.
Dlspos.  6(3): 218-225.

Jaber, H.M..  W.R.  Mabey,  A.T.  Liu, T.W. Chou and H.L.  Johnson.   1984.   Data
acquisition   for   environmental    transport   and   fate   screening.    EPA
600/6-84/009.  (NTIS PB84-243906,  PB84-243955).   312 p.

Keith, L.H.,  A.W.  Garrison,  F.R.  Allen,  et al.   1976.   Identification  of
organic compounds  In drinking water from thirteen United  States  cities.   14:
Ident. Anal.  Organic  Pollut. Water,  L.H.  Keith, Ed.   Ann Arbor  Press,  Ann
Arbor, HI.  p. 329-373.

Kuney, J.H.,  Ed.   1985.   Chemcyclopedla 1986.   Vol.  4.  American  Chemical
Society,  Washington. DC.  p. 299.

Lucas, S.V.   1984.  GC/MS analysis  of  organlcs 1n  drinking water  concen-
trates and advanced waste treatment  concentrates.   Vol.  2.  Computer-printed
tabulations of compound 1ndet1fIcatlon results  for large-volume concentrates.
Columbus   Labs.,   Columbus,  OH.    Health  Eff.  Res.  Lab.   EPA-600/1-84-0208.
NTIS PB85-128239.  397 p.

Lyman, W.J.,  W.F.  Reehl  and O.H.  Rosenblatt.   1982.   Handbook  of  Chemical
Property  Estimation Methods.  McGraw  H111  Book Co., New  York.   p. 4-9,  5-4,
Chapter 15.
001 Id                               -59-                             04/10/87

-------
Mackay, 0. and H.Y. Shlu.  1981.  A critical review of  Henry's Law constants
for chemicals of environmental  Interest.   J.  Phys.  Chem. Ref. Data.   10(4):
1175-1199.

Matsul,  S.,  T.  Murakami,   T.   Sasaki,   Y.   Hlrose   and  Y.   Iguma.    1975.
Activated  sludge degradabllHy  of organic substances  1n the  waste water  of
the Kashlma  petroleum  and petrochemical  Industrial  complex 1n Japan.   Prog.
Water Technol.  7:  645-659.

McOmle,  W.A.  and   T.R.   Barnes.    1949.   Acute  and  subacute  toxlclty  of
1,2,3-tr1chloropropane In mice and rabbits.  Fed.  Proc.  8: 319.

M1rsal1s,  J., K. Tyson,  J. Beck,  et al.   1983.   Induction of  unscheduled DNA
synthesis  (UOS)  In hepatocytes  following In  vitro   and in  vivo  treatment.
Environ. Mutagen.  5:  482.  (Abstract)

Neely,  W.B.  and G.E.  Blau.   1985.   Environmental  Exposure  from  Chemicals.
Vol. 1.  CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, PL.   p.  31.

NIOSH   (National  Institute  for  Occupational  Safety  and  Health).    1984.
Current  Awareness   File.  RTECS  (Registry   of  Toxic   Effects  of  Chemical
Substances).

NIOSH  (National  Institute for Occupational Safety and Health).  1986.  RTECS
(Registry  of Toxic  Effects  of  Chemical  Substances).   CAS   No.  3175-23-3.
Online.
OOlld                               -60-                             04/10/87

-------
NTP  (National  Toxicology  Program).   1983a.   Final  report  120-day  toxIcHy
gavage  study  of  1,2,3-tMchloropropane  In  Fischer  344  rats.   Performed by
Hazelton Laboratories.

NTP  (National   Toxicology  Program).   1983b.    Final  report  120-day gavage
toxIcUy  study   In   B6C3F1  mice.    1,2,3-Tr1chloropropane.   Performed  by
Hazelton Laboratories.

NTP  (National  Toxicology  Program).   1986.  Management Status Report.  Dated
9/5/86.

OSHA  (Occupational  Safety  and Health  Administration).   1985.  OSHA  Occupa-
tional Standards.  Permissible  Exposure Limits.   29 CFR  1910.1000.

Perry, R.H. and  D.  Green.   1984.   Perry's  Chemical Handbook.  Physical  and
Chemical Data,  6th ed.  McGraw  Hill, New York,  NY.   p.  3-61.

Ratpan, F. and H. Plaumann.  1985.   MutagenlcHy of halogenated  three-carbon
compounds and  their  methylated  derivatives.   Environ.  Mutagen.   7(3):  15.
(Abstract)

Ruth, J.H.  1986.  Odor thresholds  and  Irritation  levels  of  several  chemical
substances.   A review.  Am. Ind.  Hyg. Assoc.  0.   47: A142-A151.

Sabljlc, A.  1984.  Predictions  of  the nature and  strength  of  soil  sorptlon
of  organic  pollutants  by  molecular  topology.   J.  Agrlc.  Food  Chem.   32:
243-246.
OOlld                               -61-                             04/10/87

-------
Sa1to-Suzuk1,  R.,   S.  Teramoto  and  Y.  Shlrasu.    1982.    Dominant  lethal
studies  1n  rats   with   1,2-d1bromo-3-chloropropane  and  Us  structurally
related compounds.   Mutat. Res.   101:  321-327.

Salmon, A.G.,  R.B.  Jones and W.C.  Mackrodt.   1981.  Mlcrosomal dechlorlna-
tlon  of  chloroethanes:   Structure-reactivity   relationships.   Xenob1ot1ca.
11(11): 723-734.

Sax, N.I.  1984.  Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, 6th ed.  Van
Nostrand Relnhold Co..  New York.   p. 2631.

Shalpak,  V.H.    1976.    Biological   effect   of  chlorinated   hydrocarbon   on
animals following their  Inhalation.  Sb. Tr.,  Nauchno-Issled.  Inst. G1g. Tr.
Profzabol., T1fl1s.   15:  194-196.  (Russ.)   (CA 89:18050p)

Shcherban, N.G.  and N.N.  PUen'ko.  1975.  Effect of trlchloropropane and
pentachloropropane  on  the  body  of warm-blooded  animals.   Sb.  Nauch. Tr.
Khar'kov. Med.  In-t.  124: 27-29.  (CA 89:191916Y)

Sldorenko, G.I.,  V.R.  Tsulaya,  T.I.  Bonashevskaya  and V.H.  Shalpak.   1979.
Study  of  the combined action  of a group  of  chlorine derivatives  of  hydro-
carbons  entering the  organisms  by Inhalation.   Environ.   Health  Perspect.
30: 13-18.

Slpes,  I.G.,  D.E.   Carter  and R.F.  Volp.   n.d.   Pharmacok1net1cs of  xeno-
blotlcs: 1,2,3-Trlchloropropane.  Unpublished  study performed for  N.I.E.H.S.
under Contract  No.  N01-ES-8-2130.
OOlld                               -62-                             04/10/87

-------
 Smyth,  H.F.,  C.P.  Carpenter,  C.S.  Well  and  U.C.  Pozzanl.   1954.   Range-
 finding  tdxIcHy  data:  List  V.   A.M.A.  Arch.  Ind.  Hyg.  Occup.  Med.   10:
 61-68.

 Smyth,  H.F.,  C.P.  Carpenter,  C.S.  Well,  U.C.  Pozzanl  and  J.A.  StMegel.
 1962.   Range-finding  toxlclty  data:  List  VI.  J. Am.  Ind.  Hyg. Assoc.  23:
 95-107.

 SRI  (Stanford  Research  Institute).    1986.   1986  Directory   of  Chemical
(Producers:  United  States  of  America.  SRI  International,  Menlo  Park, CA.
 p. 1067.

 Stolzenberg,  S.J.  and  C.H.  Nine.   1980.   Hutagenlclty  of 2- and 3-carbon
 halogenated compounds  1n  the  Salmonella/mammal1an-m1crosome test.  Environ.
 Mutagen.  2(1):  59-66.

 Swann, R.L., D.A.  Laskowskl, P.O. McCall.  K. Vander Kuy and H.J. Olshburger.
 1983.   A  rapid  method  for the  estimation  of the  environmental  parameters
 octanol/water  partition  coefficient,  soil  sorptlon  constant,  water  to air
 ratio and water  solubility. Res. Rev.  85:  17-28.

 Tarasova,  K.I.   1975.  Morphological  and functional  changes  of mast  cells
 under  the effect  of  1,2,3-trlchloropropane  and tetrachloroethylene.   G1g.
 Sanlt.  11: 106-109.  (Taken from HEEP/76/09661 and  CA  84:69971u)

 Tsulaya,  V.R.,  T.I.  Bonashevskaya, V.V.  Zykova,  et al.  1977.   Toxlcologlc
 characteristics  of  some chlorinated  hydrocarbons.   G1g.  Sanlt.  8:  50-53.
 (Russian with  English translation)

 OOlld                               -63-                             04/10/87

-------
Tsulaya, V.R., T.I. Bonashevskaya, V.M. Shalpak and V.V. Zykova.  1979.  The
combined effect  of  some chlorinated hydrocarbons  on  the body.  Gig.  SanH.
0(8): 20-22.  (Russian w1th-Engl1sh translation)

U.S. EPA.   1977.  Computer  print-out of nonconf1dent1al  production data  from
TSCA Inventory.  OPTS, CIO, U.S. EPA,  Washington,  DC.

U.S.  EPA.   1980.   Guidelines   and  Methodology Used  1n the  Preparation  of
Health  Effect  Assessment   Chapters  of  the  Consent  Decree  Water   Criteria
Documents.  Federal Register.  45(231): 49347-49357.

U.S.  EPA.   1983a.   Methodology  and  Guidelines  for   Reportable   Quantity
Determinations  Based  on Chronic  Toxldty  Data.    Prepared  by  the Office  of
Health  and  Environmental  Assessment,  Environmental  Criteria  and Assessment
Office, Cincinnati, OH  for .the  Office  of Solid Waste  and Emergency  Response,
Washington, DC.

U.S. EPA.   1983b.  Health  and  Environmental  Effects Profile  for  TMchloro-
propane  Isomers.   Prepared  by  the  Office  of  Health  and   Environmental
Assessment, Environmental  Criteria  and Assessment Office,  Cincinnati,  OH for
the Office of Solid Waste.  Washington, DC.

U.S. EPA.   1986a.   Methodology  for Evaluating Carc1nogen1c1ty  In Support  of
Reportable Quantity Adjustments  Pursuant to CERCLA Section 102.   Prepared  by
the  Office  of  Health  and Environmental  Assessment,   Carcinogen  Assessment
Group,  Washington,  DC  for  the  Office  of Solid Waste  and Emergency  Response,
Washington,  DC.
OOlld                               -64-                             05/12/87

-------
U.S.  EPA.   1986b.   Integrated Risk  Information System  (IRIS),  Reference  Dose
(RfDs)  for  Oral  Exposure.   1,2,3-TMchloropropane.   On  line.   (Verification
date  05/14/86).    Prepared  by   the  Office  of  Health   and   Environmental
Assessment, Environmental Criteria and Assessment  Office,  Cincinnati,  OH.

U.S.  EPA.   1986c.    Guidelines   for  Carcinogen  Risk  Assessment.    Federal
Register.  51(185):  33992-34003.

U.S.  EPA.    1987a.   Graphical   Exposure  Modeling  System   (GEMS).    CLOGP
computer program.  Office of Toxic Substances,  U.S.  EPA,  Washington,  DC.

U.S.  EPA.   1987b.    Graphical  Exposure  Modeling  System (GEMS).   Fate  of
Atmospheric  Pollutants  (FAP).   Office  of  Toxic  Substances,  U.S.   EPA,
Washington, DC.

Van Dyke,  R.A.  and  C.G.  Wlneman.  1971.  Enzymk dechlorlnatlon.   Dechlorl-
natlon  of  chloroethanes  and propanes  in vitro.   Blochem.  Pharmacol.   20(2):
463-470.

Vllleneuve, D.C., I. Chu. V.E.  Secours,  M.G.  Cotle,  G.L.  Plaa and V.E. ValH.
1985.    Results  of a 90-day toxlclty  study on  1,2,3- and  1,1,2-trlchloropro-
pane administered via the drinking water.   Sd.  Total  Environ.   47:  421-426.

Volp,   R.F.,  I.G.   S1pes,  C.  Falcoz,  O.E.  Carter   and   J.F.  Gross.   1984.
Disposition  of  1,2,3-trlchloropropane  1n  the  Flscher-344 rat:  Conventional
and physiological pharmacoklnetlcs.  Toxlcol. Appl.  Pharmacol.   75(1): 8-17.
001 Id                               -65-                             05/12/87

-------
Wakeham, S.G.,  J.T.  Goodwin and A.C.  Davis.   1983.   Distributions and  fate
of  volatile  organic  compounds  1n  Narragansett Bay,  Rhode  Island.  Can.  J.
F1sh Aquat. Sc1.  40: 304-321.

Weast,  R.C.   1985.  CRC  Handbook of  Chemistry and  Physics,  66th ed.   CRC
Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.  p. C-444.

Williams,  P.M.    1949.    Chlorine  compounds,  organic.    In.:   K1rk-0thmer
Encyclopedia  of Chemical  Technology,  1st ed.,  Vol.  3,  R.E.  Kirk and  D.F.
Othmer, Ed.  Intersdence Encyclopedia, Inc.,  New York.   p.  775-776, 838.

Wright,  W.H.  and  J.M.  Schaffer.    1932.   Critical  anthel1m1nt1c tests  of
chlorinated alkyl  hydrocarbons and  a  correlation between  the anthe!1m1nt1c
efficacy,  chemical  structure  and  physical   properties.   Am.  J.   Hyg.   16:
325-428.
OOlld                               -6S-                             05/12/87

-------
                                  APPENDIX A

                              LITERATURE SEARCHED



    This  HEED  Is  based  on  data  Identified  by  computerized   literature

searches of the following:


         TSCATS
         CASR online (U.S. EPA Chemical  Activities  Status  Report)
         TOXLINE
         TOXBACK 76
         TOXBACK 65
         RTECS
         OHM TADS
         STORET
         SRC Environmental Fate Data Bases
         SANSS
         AQUIRE
         TSCAPP
         NTIS
         Federal Register


These searches were conducted. 1n December,  1986.   In  addition,  hand searches

were made of  Chemical  Abstracts  (Collective Indices  5-9), and  the following

secondary sources should be reviewed:                     .


    ACGIH (American  Conference of Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).
    1986.   Documentation  of   the Threshold  Limit  Values  and  Biological
    Exposure Indices, 5th ed.  Cincinnati, OH.

    ACGIH (American  Conference of Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).
    1986-1987.  TLVs: Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances In
    the  Work  Environment  adopted  by  ACGIH with  Intended Changes  for
    1986-1987.  Cincinnati, OH.  Ill p.

    Clayton,  G.D.   and  F.E.  Clayton,  Ed.   1981.    Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene and Toxicology,  3rd   rev.  ed.. Vol.  2A.   John  Wiley  and
    Sons, NY.   2878 p.

    Clayton,  G.D.   and  F.E.  Clayton,  Ed.   1981.    Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene and Toxicology,  3rd   rev.  ed.. Vol.  2B.   John  Wiley  and
    Sons, NY.   p. 2879-3816.

    Clayton,  G.D.   and  F.E.  Clayton,  Ed.   1982.    Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene and Toxicology,  3rd   rev.  ed., Vol.  2C.   John  Wiley  and
    Sons, NY.   p. 3817-5112.
OOlld                               -67-                             05/12/87

-------
    Grayson, M.  and 0.  Eckroth,  Ed.  1978-1984.   K1rk-0thmer  Encyclo-
    pedia of Chemical Technology, 3rd ed.   John  Wiley  and  Sons,  NY.   23
    Volumes.

    Hamilton, A. and H.I.  Hardy.  1974.   Industrial  Toxicology,  3rd  ed.
    Publishing Sciences Group, Inc., Littleton, MA.  575 p.

    IARC  (International  Agency  for  Research  on  Cancer).  IARC  Mono-
    graphs  on  the  Evaluation  of  Carcinogenic  Risk   of  Chemicals  to
    Humans.  WHO, IARC, Lyons, France.

    Jaber,  H.M.,  W.R.  Mabey,  A.T.   Lieu,  T.W.  Chou  and  H.L.  Johnson.
    1984.    Data   acquisition   for   environmental   transport   and  fate
    screening for  compounds  of Interest  to  the Office  of  Solid  Waste.
    SRI   International,  Menlo   Park,  CA.    EPA   600/6-84-010.    NTIS
    PB84-243906.

    NTP  (National  Toxicology  Program).   1986.   Toxicology Research  and
    Testing  Program.    Chemicals   on  Standard  Protocol.   Management
    Status.

    Ouellette,  R.P. and  J.A.  King.   1977.   Chemical  Week  Pesticide
    Register.  McGraw-Hill  Book Co., NY.

    Sax,  I.N.   1984.   Dangerous  Properties  of  Industrial Materials,  6th
    ed.  Van Nostrand Relnhold Co.,  NY.

    SRI  (Stanford   Research  Institute).   1986.   Directory of  Chemical
    Producers.  Menlo Park, CA.      .     .

    U.S.  EPA.   1986.  Report  on Status  Report  In  the Special  Review
    Program,  Registration  Standards  Program  and  the  Data  Call  In
    Programs.   Registration  Standards  and  the  Data  Call   1n  Programs.
    Office of Pesticide Programs. Washington, DC.

    U.S.  EPA.   1985.   CSB  Existing  Chemical Assessment Tracking System.
    Name  and CAS Number Ordered  Indexes.  Office  of  Toxic Substances,
    Washington,  DC.

    USITC  (U.S.  International  Trade  Commission)..  1985.   Synthetic
    Organic  Chemicals.   U.S.  Production  and  Sales,  1984, USITC Publ.
    1422, Washington. DC.

    Verschueren, K.   1983.  Handbook of  Environmental  Data  on Organic
    Chemicals, 2nd ed.   Van Nostrand Relnhold Co., NY.

    Wlndholz. M.. Ed.  1983.  The Merck  Index, 10th ed.  Merck and Co.,
    Inc., Rahway, NJ.

    Worthing, C.R.  and  S.B.  Walker,  Ed.    1983.   The  Pesticide Manual.
    British Crop Protection Council.  695 p.
OOlld                               -68-                             05/12/87

-------
    In addition,  approximately 30  compendia  of aquatic  toxldty  data were

reviewed, Including the following:


    Battelle's  Columbus  Laboratories.   1971.   Water  Quality  Criteria
    Data   Book.    Volume  3.   Effects   of   Chemicals   on   Aquatic   Life.
    Selected  Data  from the Literature  through  1968.   Prepared for  the
    U.S.  EPA under Contract No. 68-01-0007.  Washington,  DC.

    Johnson,  W.W.  and  M.T. Flnley.   1980.  Handbook  of Acute  Toxldty
    of Chemicals  to   Fish  and  Aquatic  Invertebrates.   Summaries   of
    Toxldty  Tests  Conducted  at  Columbia  National  Fisheries  Research
    Laboratory.    1965-1978.    U.S.  Dept.   Interior,  F1sh  and  Wildlife
    Serv. Res. Publ.  137,  Washington,  DC.

    McKee, J.E.  and H.W.  Wolf.  1963.  Water  Quality Criteria, 2nd  ed.
    Prepared  for  the   Resources   Agency   of   California,   State   Water
    Quality Control Board.   Publ.  No.  3-A.

    Plmental, D.  1971.  Ecological Effects of  Pesticides  on  Non-Target
    Spedes.  Prepared  for the U.S.  EPA, Washington,  DC.   PB-269605.

    Schneider, B.A.  1979.  Toxicology  Handbook.  Mammalian and Aquatic
    Data.  Book 1: Toxicology  Data.   Office of  Pesticide  Programs, U.S.
    EPA,  Washington,  DC.  EPA 540/9-79-003.  NTIS  PB  80-196876.
001 Id                               -69-                             05/12/87

-------
                                                                  APPfNOIX B



                                                        ry Table for 1,1,2-TrJchloropropane
Species/
Sex
Inhalation Exposure
Subchrontc ID
Chronic ID
Carclnogenlclty ID
Oral Exposure
Subchrontc rat/
female
Chronic rat/
female
Carctnogenlclty ID
BJ PORTABLE QUANTITIES
Based on Chronic Toxtclty:
Based on Carclnogenlclty:
Exposure

ID
ID
ID

100 mg/t In drinking
water for 13 weeks
(20.3 mg/kg/day)
100 mg/t In drinking
water for 13 weeks
(20.3 mg/kg/day)
ID
t
1000
ID
Effect

10
ID
ID

htstopathologlcal lesions
In liver, kidney, thyroid
at 1000 mg/l
hlstopathologlcal lesions
In liver, kidney, thyroid
at 1000 mg/l
10



RfD or q)* Reference

ID NA
ID NA
ID NA

0.2 mg/kg/day Vllleiieuve
or 14 mg/day et al., 198S
for 70 kg human
0.02 *g/kg/day Vllleneuve
or 1 ng/day for et al.. 1985
70 kg human
NA

Vllleneuve
et al.. 198S
NA
ID » Insufficient  data;  NA *  not  applicable

-------
                                                                   APPENDIX  C



                                                    Suonary Table for 1.2,3-Trlchloropropane
Species Exposure
Inhalation Exposure
Subchronlc 10 10
Chronic ID 10
Carclnogentclty ID ID
Oral Exposure
Subchronlc rat 8 mg/kg. 5 days/week
J5.7 Mg/kg/day)
Chronic rat 8 Mg/kg. 5 days/week
(5.7 Mg/kg/day)
Carclnogenlclty ID ID
RE PORT ABL E QUANTJT 1 E S
Based on Chronic Toxlclty: 100
Based on Carclnogenlclty: ID
Effect

ID
ID
ID

transient clinical signs;
elevated relative liver
weight In Mies
transient clinical signs;
elevated relative liver
weight In Males
ID



RfD or qj»

ID
10
10

0.06 mg/kg/day or
4 Mg/day for 70 kg
human
6 »jg/kg/day or 0.4
mg/day for 70 kg
human
NA



Reference

NA
NA
NA

NIP. 1983a
NTP. 1983d


NTP. 1983a
NA
ID . Insufficient data; NA « not applicable

-------