-------
                                  DISCLAIMER

    This report  Is  an external draft  for  review purposes only and  does  not
constitute Agency  policy.   Mention  of  trade names  or  commercial  products
does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                       11

-------

-------
                              EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    Caprolactam  1s  a white hygroscopic,  crystalline  solid at room  tempera-
ture and  has  a unique odor  (Fischer  and  Crescent1n1, 1982).  It  Is  soluble
In many  common organic  solvents  Including petroleum distillates, methanol,
ethanol and  ether  and  1s very  soluble In water  (Fischer and  Crescentlnl,
1982;  Hawley,  1981;  Wlndholz,  1983).   Current domestic  manufacturers  are
Allied Corp.  1n  Hopewell,  VA,  BASF  1n Freeport,  TX,  and  N1pro,  Inc.,  1n
Augusta,   GA  (CMR, 1986).  During 1985, 189.5  million pounds of  caprolactam
was  produced  In  the United States  (USITC,  1986).   The  most recent  Import
data available  Indicate  that  18.973 million  pounds  was  Imported Into  the
United States  through, principal U.S. customs  districts during 1983  (USITC,
1984).   Allied  uses phenol  and BASF  and  N1pro use cyclohexane as feedstock
1n the manufacture  of caprolactam (CMR,  1986).   The  use  pattern  for  capro-
lactam 1s  as  follows (CMR. 1986):   Nylon  6 fibers Including monofllaments,
87%; Nylon 6 resins and film.  10%;  exports, 3%.
    If released  to  air,  this compound  1s  expected to  exist  almost  entirely
1n the vapor phase  (E1senre1ch et al.,  1981).   The half-life for  caprolactam
vapor  reacting   with   photochemically   generated  hydroxyl  radicals   was
estimated  to  be  3.5 days (U.S.  EPA,  1987a).   Small amounts of  the  compound
may  be  removed by  wet  deposition.   Reaction  with  ozone  and removal  by  dry
deposition are  not  expected to be  significant fate processes.    If  released
to water,  aerobic blodegradatlon and  chemical  degradation  are expected to be
significant   removal  mechanisms   (t-i/o   of   <1<5  weeks)   (Fortman   and
Rosenberg, 1984).  B1oaccumulat1on  In  aquatic organisms  and adsorption  to
suspended  solids  and sediments should  not be  significant.   If  released  to
                                      1v

-------
soil,  caprolactam  may  undergo  significant  blodegradatlon.   Based  on  Us
estimated  low  K    value,   residual  caprolactam  In  soil  may  leach  Into
groundwater.
    Caprolactam  may be  released to  the environment  1n  the  effluent  from
production  and  use  facilities  and 1n  leachates from  waste  disposal  sites
(Abrams et  al.,  1975).   This compound was detected In  drinking water  1n  the
United States and 1n Germany (Kopfler  et  al., 1977; Shackelford and  Keith,
1976; Kool  et al.,  1982),  surface waters downstream from  a tire  fire  runoff
zone  1n  Virginia  (Peterson  et   al.,  1986),  the  final  effluent  from  a  dye
manufacturing  plant  In  Massachusetts   (Games  and  H1tes,   1977)   and   the
effluent water from landfill  sites 1n  Delaware (Shackelford and  Keith,  1976).
    Little  Information  was  available concerning  toxlclty  of caprolactam  to
aquatic organisms.  The two  available studies  (Loewengart, 1984;  Stuplna  and
Blleka, 1973) Indicated  that caprolactam was relatively nontoxlc to aquatic
b-lota.
    Pharmacoklnetlc  studies  of  caprolactam  Indicate  that the  compound  Is
nearly completely  and  rapidly absorbed  from the gastrointestinal tract  and
distributed  throughout  the   body  with peak   concentrations  In  most tissues
except the  kidney  and bladder,  similar  to blood levels  (Unger et al.,  1981;
Maddell et  al.,  1984).   No  tissue appears  to have  a tendency to  retain
caprolactam.   A   whole-body autoradlography  study  using  pregnant  mice
Indicated  that caprolactam distributes to, but does not  concentrate  1n  fetal
tissues (Waddell et al., 1984).
    Little  1s known about  the metabolism of  caprolactam.   Goldblatt et  al.
(1954) found an  Increase  In  urinary ami no adds In rats Injected Intraperl-
toneally with caprolactam, so  It Is  likely  that the compound Is hydrolyzed
to  c-am1nocapro1c  acid.  Because  an  Increase In  urinary ami no  adds  was

-------
not  observed  1n  rabbits,  Goldblatt  et al.  (1954)  suggested  that  rabbits
metabolize caprolactam more completely  than rats.   Unger et al.  (1981)  found
two  unidentified  metabolites  and unmetabollzed  caprolactam  1n  the urine  of
male F344 rats  orally  dosed  with the compound.  Caprolactam and  Us  metabo-
lites  were  excreted  predominantly  In  the  urine   and  expired  air  of  rats
(Goldblatt et al.,  1954;  linger  et  al., 1981).  Mice excrete caprolactam  or
Us metabolites (or both) through the kidneys  and  through  the liver  (Waddell
et al., 1984).
    No subchronlc Inhalation studies of caprolactam toxlclty were available.
In  an  occupational  study,  no  effects  on  general health were   observed  In
workers exposed  to  0.2-12.3 ppm (0.9-56.9 mg/m3)  caprolactam  vapor  for  up
to 18 years (Ferguson and Wheeler,  1973).   Irritation,  however, was reported
at  >7  ppm  (32  mg/m3).   Occupational  exposure to caprolactam  dust  at  >6
mg/m3 was associated with respiratory and  dermal Irritation (Kelman, 1986).
    An early  subchronlc  study  of  caprolactam  found that water   Intake  and
body weight was  depressed  1n  rats that were given  drinking water containing
caprolactam at  0.75  g/100  ml  (Goldblatt   et  al., 1954).  No  other  param-
eters were examined.
    Three studies completed  In the Netherlands, summarized by Gross  (1984),
found  hyaline  droplet  degeneration  1n   the   epithelium of   the proximal
convoluted tubules  of  kidneys  In rats  exposed  to  caprolactam In  the  diet  at
>0.05% for  up to 90 days.  Hale rats  were more sensitive than  female  rats.
Other  effects observed at  1% of  diet Included body weight  depression  and
Increased liver  and kidney  weights.  Powers et al.  (1984) found reversible
renal effects 1n  stressed  rats fed low (0.01-0.5X)  levels of caprolactam In
the diet  for  90 days.   In unstressed rats, elevated  BUN  and  hyaline  droplet
degeneration  1n the kidney occurred at 0.5% but not at 0.1% of  the diet.
                                      vl

-------
    The only  effects  noted  In the 13-week NTP  (1982)  study  were  weight  gain
and food Intake depression  1n F344 rats  fed  caprolactam at levels >2500  ppm,
and weight gain depression In mice fed caprolactam at levels  >5000 ppm.
    In a 90-day  study (Burdock  et a!., 1984)*  female  beagle dogs fed  capro-
lactam  1n  the diet at  1% showed an  Insignificant decrease   1n body weight.
No effects were noted at dietary levels <0.5X.
    In the NTP (1982) study, weight gain  and food consumption were depressed
In  F344  rats fed  at  3750 and  7500  ppm  for  103  weeks.  Caprolactam In  the
diet at 7500  and  15,000 ppm reduced body weight  gain  In B6C3F1 mice but  had
no effect on food Intake.  No other  effects  were noted.
    Acute exposures  of  humans  to  caprolactam vapor at 100  ppm  (463 mg/m3)
resulted In  severe nose, throat  and  eye discomfort (Ferguson and Wheeler,
1973).  At  7  ppm (32  mg/m3)  no  distress  was  noted.  Tuma  et  al.  (1981)
reported a case of dermatitis,  fever and  grand  mal seizures  In a  man occupa-
tlonally exposed to caprolactam for  3  days.
    Guinea pigs  exposed to  caprolactam  dust at  118-261  mg/m3,  7  hours/day
for 7 days coughed occasionally (Goldblatt et al., 1954).
    The only significant effect noted In  rats fed caprolactam In  the diet at
levels >5000 ppm  were pale  mottled  kidneys   In all groups  of male rats  (NTP,
1982). No effects were observed  In mice at dietary levels  of  5000-30,000  ppm.
    Acute  toxic   signs   observed  1n  rats   Injected  1ntraper1tonea11y   with
caprolactam Include cries,  tremors, apprehension,  depression of temperature,
chromodacryorrhea  (500-600  mg/kg),   convulsions  and  death   (900  mg/kg)
(Goldblatt et  al., 1954).   Oral  LD5Q  values   1n  rats vary  from 1.15  g/kg
(Bormann and Loeser,  1959) to "2.5 g/kg (Friedman  and Salerno. 1980).
    The NTP  (1982) oral  cardnogenldty  study  of caprolactam did  not result
1n  Increased  tumor  Incidences  1n either  rats  or  mice.  The carclnogenlclty
of caprolactam has not been  studied  by  any other route  of  exposure.

-------
    Negative  results  were found  1n mutation  assays  1n  S.  typh1mur1um.  1n
mltotlc  gene  conversion,  chromosome  aneuploldy,  mltotlc  segregation  and
mitochondria!  mutation  1n yeast,   1n  assays for  DNA single-strand  breaks,
sister chromatld  exchange  and metabolic  cooperation  In mammalian cells  and
cell transformation assays 1n  C3H10T1/2,  Balb/c 3T3,  Fischer rat  embryo  and
CHO cells.   Positive  results  were  found 1n  assays  for nuclear mutation  1n
yeast, somatic  recombination  and  mutation   In  J).  melanoqaster.  chromosomal
aberrations  1n  human  lymphocytes and  Chinese hamster  lung  cells, and  cell
transformations 1n Syrian hamster embryo  cells.
    Khadzhleva  (1969a)   reported a concentration-related  decrease  1n  the
percent of pregnant rats, the  average  number  of  young/litter  and the  average
fetal  weight  of  fetuses from  pregnant rats  exposed to caprolactam vapor  at
139.2 and 473.4 mg/m3  for various segments of the gestation period.
    In teratogenlclty studies  by Gad  et  al.  (1984),  rats treated by gavage
with  caprolactam  at 0,  100, 500 or  1000 mg/kg/day  on  gestation days  6-12
experienced  a significant  Increase In  fetal resorptlons  In the high-dose
groups.   In  rabbits treated by gavage  at  150  mg/kg/day on gestation  days
6-28,  maternal  body weights  were decreased  and fetal weights were  signifi-
cantly reduced.  No effects  were noted  at 50 mg/kg/day.
    Gross  (1984)  summarized  Russian   studies  (Hartynova, 1972;  Khadzhleva,
1969b, 1972;  Pestrl, 1970; Nadezhdlna  and Talaklna, 1971; Hartynova  et  al.,
1972)  and  found an excess of  dysmenorrhea, menorrhagla,  ollgomenorrhea  and
obstetrical  complications In women  occupatlonally exposed to caprolactam at
levels ranging  from 1-400 mg/m3.   Reproductive effects reported  In  Russian
studies where  rats  were exposed to caprolactam vapor at  425-525  or  120-150
mg/m3  Include a  shortening  of the rutting  phase and  a  lengthening  of  the
resting phase  with  an   Increase  In  the number of  corpora  lutea  (Khadzhleva,
1969b, 1972).
                                     V111

-------
    Results of a  3-generatlon  study  (Serota et al., 1984)  showed  lower  body
weights  1n  the offspring  of  F344 rats  fed caprolactam  at 5000 and  10,000
ppm.  An Increase In the severity of  spontaneous  nephropathy was  observed  In
parental rats at 10,000 ppm.   No other hlstopathologlcal  effects  were  noted.
    Caprolactam was assigned the EPA  Class  E,  evidence of noncardnogenlclty
to humans based on a negative NTP (1982)  bloassay using  rats and mice.   Lack
of pertinent data precludes recommendation of  an  RfD for  Inhalation exposure
to  caprolactam.   An  RfD for  subchronlc  oral  exposure  of 0.5 mg/kg/day  (35
mg/day)  was  based on  a NOAEL  for  kidney  effects In rats  (Powers  et  al.,
1984),  and  further  supported  by a  NOAEL of  50  mg/kg/day for  fetotoxldty
without maternal effects 1n another study (Gad et al., 1984).  An  RfD  of 0.5
mg/kg/day  (35  mg/day)   for chronic  oral   exposure was  based on  a NOAEL for
reduced  body  weight of offspring  1n rat  pups   1n a  dietary 3-generat1on-
reproductlon  study  (Serota  et  al.,  1984).   An  RQ  of  1000  was  based  on
reduced  rate  of body  weight  gain In  rats  1n a  13-week  subchronlc  dietary
experiment.
                                      1x

-------
                             TABLE  OF  CONTENTS
                                                                       Page
1.  INTRODUCTION	    1

    1.1.   STRUCTURE AND CAS NUMBER	    1
    1.2.   PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES 	    1
    1.3.   PRODUCTION DATA	    2
    1.4.   USE DATA	    2
    1.5.   SUMMARY	    4

2.  ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND TRANSPORT	    5

    2.1.   AIR	    5

           2.1.1.   Reaction with Hydroxyl Radicals .  .  	    5
           2.1.2.   Reaction with Ozone 	    5
           2.1.3.   Physical Removal Processes.	    5

    2.2.   WATER	    5

           2.2.1.   Chemical Degradation	    5
           2.2.2.   Mlcroblal Degradation 	 .....    6
           2.2.3.   Bloconcentratlon	  .  .  .  .    1
           2.2.4.   Adsorption	    7

    2.3.   SOIL	    7

           2.3.1.   Chemical Degradation	-.  .    7
           2.3.2.   B1odegradat1on	    7
           2.3.3.   Adsorption	    7

    2.4.   SUMMARY	    8

3.  EXPOSURE	    9

    3.1.   WATER	    9
    3.2.   SUMMARY	    9

4.  AQUATIC TOXICITY	   10

    4.1.   ACUTE TOXICITY	   10
    4.2.   CHRONIC EFFECTS	   10
    4.3.   PLANT EFFECTS	   10
    4.4.   SUMMARY	   10

5.  PHARMACOKINETCS	   11

    5.1.   ABSORPTION	   11
    5.2.   DISTRIBUTION	   11
    5.3.   METABOLISM	   13
    5.4.   EXCRETION	   14
    5.5.   SUMMARY	   15

-------
                           TABLE  OF  CONTENTS (cont.)

                                                                        Page
 6.  EFFECTS	   17

     6.1.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY	   17

            6.1.1.   Inhalation Exposures	   17
            6.1.2.   Oral Exposures	   18
            6.1.3.   Other Relevant Information	   23

     6.2.   CARCINOGENICITY	   25

            6.2.1.   Inhalation	   25
            6.2.2.   Oral	   25
            6.2.3.   Other Relevant Information	   27

     6.3.   MUTAGENICITY	   27
     6.4.   TERATOGENICITY	   30
     6.5.   OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS 	   32
     6.6.   SUMMARY	   34

 7.  EXISTING GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS	;	   38

     7.1.   HUMAN	   38
     7.2.   AQUATIC	   38

 8.  RISK ASSESSMENT	   39

     8.1.   CARCINOGENICITY	   39

            8.1.1.   Inhalation. ... 	   39
            8.1.2.   Oral	   39
            8.1.3.   Other Routes	   39
            8.1.4.   Weight of Evidence	   39
            8.1.5.   Quantitative Risk Estimates	   39

     8.2.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY	   39

            8.2.1.   Inhalation Exposure 	   39
            8.2.2.   Oral Exposure	   41

 9.  REPORTABLE QUANTITIES 	   46

     9.1.   BASED ON SYSTEMIC TOXICITY 	   46
     9.2.   BASED ON CARCINOGENICITY	   50

10.  REFERENCES	   51

APPENDIX A: LITERATURE SEARCHED	   62
APPENDIX B: SUMMARY TABLE FOR CAPROLACTAM	   65
                                      x1

-------
                               LIST OF  TABLES
No.                               Title                               Page
1-1     Current Domestic Manufacturers  of  Caprolactam 	     3
6-1     Acute and LQ$Q Values  for  Caprolactam  	      26
6-2     Mutagenldty Testing of Caprolactam	    28
9-1     Oral Tox1c1ty Summary  for  Caprolactam  	    47
9-2     Oral Composite Scores  for  Caprolactam	    48
9-3     Caprolactam: Minimum Effective  Dose (MED)  and Reportable
        Quantity (RQ)	    49

-------
                            LIST OF ABBRIVIATIONS

ALP                     Alkaline phosphatase
BUN                     Blood  urea  nitrogen
CAS                     Chemical Abstract Service
CHO                     Chinese hamster ovary
CNS                     Central nervous system
COD          .           Chemical oxygen demand
CS                      Composite score
DMA                     DeoxyMbonuclelc acid
GABA                    Y-am1nobutyr1c acid
GFR                     Glomerular  filtration rate
HPLC                    High performance liquid chromatography
K                       Soil sorptlon coefficient
K                       Octanol/water partition coefficient
 ow                                   r
LOH                     Lactate dehydrogenase
LOAEL                   Lowest-observed-adverse-effect level
MAC                     Maximum acceptable concentration
MED                     Minimum effective dose
NOAEL                   No-observed-adverse-effect level
ppm                     Parts  per million
RQ                      Reportable quantity
RV.                     Dose-rating value
RV                      Effect-rating value
RfD                     Reference dose
SHE                     Syrian hamster embryo
STEL                    Short-term-effect level
TAT                     Tyroslne amlnotransferase
TLV                     Threshold-limit value
TPO                     Tryptophan oxygenase
TWA                     Time-weighted average

-------
                               1.  INTRODUCTION
1.1.   STRUCTURE AND CAS NUMBER
    Caprolactam  Is  also  known as  e-caprolactam,  hexahydro-2H-azep1-2~one
and  2-oxohexamethylene1m1ne  (Wlndholz,   1983).    The  structure,   molecular
weight* empirical formula and CAS Registry number are as follows:
Molecular weight:  113.16
Empirical formula:  C,H,,ON
                     o 11
CAS Registry number:  105-60-2
1.2.   PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
    Caprolactam  Is  a  white, hygroscopic,  crystalline solid at  room tempera-
ture and has  a  unique odor (Fischer and Crescent1n1, 1982).  It  Is a  cyclic
amide  and  undergoes  reactions  typical of  this class  of  compounds such  as
hydrolysis,   N-a1ky1at1on,   0-alkylatlon,   nltrosatlon   and   halogenatlon
(Fischer and  Crescent1n1,  1982).   Caprolactam Is  soluble  1n many  common
organic  solvents  Including  petroleum distillates,  methanol,  ethanol  and
ethyl  ether  (Fischer  and  Crescent1n1,  1982;  Hawley, 1981; Wlndholz,  1983).
Selected physical properties are given below.
Melting point, °C:
Boiling point, °C:
Vapor pressure (25°C):
Hater solubility (25°C):
Log Kou:
69.3
266.9
1.9xlO"3 mm Hg
5.25x1O6 mg/l
-0.19
Fischer and Crescentlnl, 1982
Fischer and Crescentlnl, 1982
Jones, 1960
Fischer and Crescentlnl, 1982
Hansch and Leo, 1981
0065d
        -1-
                     01/20/88

-------
Density (77°C):             1.02 g/cm3          R1dd1ck et  al.,  1986
Refractive Index, njj1:      1.4935              Fischer and Crescentlnl,  1982
Flashpoint (°C):            125 (closed cup)     Rlddlck et  al..  1986
Water odor threshold
(60°C):                     59.7 ppm            Llllard and Powers, 1975

1.3.   PRODUCTION DATA
    Current domestic  manufacturers  of caprolactam are listed 1n Table  1-1.
During 1985, 1089.5 million pounds of  caprolactam was  produced  1n  the  United
States (USITC.  1986).   The most  recent  Import  data  available  Indicate  that
18.973 million  pounds was  Imported  Into the United States  through the prin-
cipal U.S.  customs  districts  during  1983  (USITC,  1984).   Allied Corp.  uses
phenol, and BASF  and Nlpro use  cyclohexane  as  feedstock  In  the manufacture
of  caprolactam  (CHR,  1986).    Cyclohexanone,  obtained either  by catalytic
hydrogenatlon   of  phenol  or  by  oxidation  of  cyclohexane,  Is  reacted  with
hydroxylamlne   to  form   cyclohexanone oxlme.   Cyclohexanone  oxlme  In   the
                   *
presence  of oleum  can   then  be  converted to  caprolactam  by  Beckmann   re-
arrangement (Fischer and Crescentlnl,  1982).
1.4.   USE DATA
    The use pattern  for caprolactam  1s as  follows   (CHR,  1986):   Nylon  6
fibers Including monofllaments,  87%;  Nylon  6  resins  and film,  10%;  exports,
3%.  Small  amounts  of caprolactam (<1X)  are used 1n  special  coatings, brush
bristles  and   textile  stlffeners and  as  a  reactive  additive  for  floor
polishes (IARC, 1979a).  Allied  Corp.  uses Us  entire output of caprolactam
captWely  1n the  production  of  fibers  and  plastics.   BASF uses the bulk  of
Us output captlvely for fiber production and sells both monomer and polymer
products.    Nlpro  uses   Us  entire  output  of  caprolactam  to  supply   the
merchant market (Fischer and  Crescentlnl, 1982;  CMR, 1986).
0065d                               -2-                              01/20/88

-------
                                  TABLE 1-1
                Current Domestic Manufacturers of Caprolactam3
Company
Allied Corp.
BASF
N1pro, Inc.
Location
Hopewell, VA
Freeport, TX
Augusta, GA
Annual Capacity
(millions of pounds)
560b
350
180C
aSource: CMR, 1986
^Allied  1s  planning  an  Incremental  expansion  of  plant  capacity  to  600
 million pounds by 1988.
cN1pro has 180 million pounds of Idled capacity at this plant.
0065d                               -3-                              06/16/87

-------
1.5.   SUMMARY
    Caprolactam  1s  a white hygroscopic,  crystalline  solid at  room  tempera-
ture and has  a  unique odor (Fischer  and Crescent1n1,  1982).   It  1s  soluble
1n  many  common  organic  solvents  Including  petroleum  distillates,  methanol,
ethanol  and  ether  and  Is very  soluble  In water  (Fischer and  Crescentlnl,
1982;  Hawley,  1981;  Wlndholz, 1983).   Current domestic  manufacturers  are
Allied Corp.  In  Hopewell,  VA, BASF  In  Freeport,  TX, and  Nlpro,  Inc.,  1n
Augusta,  GA  (CMR,  1986).  During 1985,  189.5  million pounds of  caprolactam
was  produced  1n  the  United States  (USITC,  1986).   The  most  recent  Import
data available  Indicate  that  18.973 million  pounds  was  Imported  Into  the
United States  through principal U.S.  customs  districts during 1983  (USITC,
1984).   Allied  uses phenol and BASF  and Nlpro use cyclohexane as  feedstock
In  the manufacture  of caprolactam  (CHR,  1986).   The  use  pattern for  capro-
lactam 1s  as  follows (CHR, 1986):   Nylon 6 fibers Including monofllaments,
87%; Nylon 6 resins and film,  10%;  exports,  3%.
0065d                               -4-                              01/20/88

-------
                     2.  ENVIRONMENTAL FATE  AND TRANSPORT

    Limited  data  pertaining  to  the  environmental   fate  and  transport  of
caprolactam  could  not be  located In  the available  literature  as cited  1n
Appendix A.  Information concerning  the  fate and transport of this  compound
was derived from physical property data or molecular  structure.
2.1.   AIR
    Based  on a  vapor  pressure   of  1.9xlO~a  mm Hg  at 25°C  (Jones,  1960}
caprolactam  1s  expected  to exist almost  entirely  1n the vapor phase  In  the
atmosphere (Elsenrelch et al., 1981).
2.1.1.   Reaction  with  Hydroxyl  Radicals.    The   estimated   half-life  for
caprolactam  vapor  reacting with  photochemlcally generated hydroxyl  radicals
1n  the  atmosphere  1s 3.5  days using an ambient hydroxyl  radical  concentra-
tion  of 8.0x10" molecules/cm3 and  an  estimated reaction  rate  constant  of
2.89x10'" cmVmolecule-sec at 25°C (U.S.  EPA,  1987a).
2.1.2.   Reaction with Ozone.  Caprolactam  1s not  susceptible  to oxidation
by ozone In the atmosphere (U.S.  EPA, 1987a).
2.1.3.   Physical Removal  Processes.   Because  of the  relatively  high  water
solubility of  caprolactam  (see  Section 1.2.),  significant  amounts  of  this
compound may be removed from the atmosphere by wet  deposition.   It  appears
that  removal by  dry  deposition would not be significant since this  compound
1s expected to exist almost entirely  1n the  vapor phase 1n  the atmosphere.
2.2.   WATER
2.2.1.   Chemical  Degradation.   Degradation  of   50  ppm  caprolactam   1n
sterilized natural water  samples at  20°C was  >355i  In lake water  and  50%  In
0065d                               -5-                              01/20/88

-------
stream water over a 3-week period, which  Indicates  that  chemical  degradation
of  caprolactam   may   be  a   significant  removal  mechanism   (Fortman  and
Rosenberg,  1984).   Amides may  be susceptible  to  chemical  hydrolysis under
environmental conditions (Lyman et al.,  1982).
2.2.2.   M1crob1al  Degradation.   Degradation  of  caprolactam  In  natural
water samples was markedly higher  1n unsterlUzed samples than  In  sterilized
water samples, which  suggests  that blodegradatlon Is an  Important mechanism
for the  removal  of caprolactam from natural  waters (Fortman and  Rosenberg,
1984).   Degradation  of 50 ppm  caprolactam In  unsteMUzed  lake and  stream
water  samples  at  20°C  was  75-100%   after   3  weeks   (!,.„   <1.5  weeks),
compared with  >35 and  50% degradation  In sterilized  lake  and stream water
samples,  respectively   (Fortman   and   Rosenberg,   1984).   14COp  evolution
from  unsterlUzed lake  and  stream  waters  containing  40.4  ppm  14C-capro-
lactam was <5% after 3 weeks, which suggests  that primary degradation  of the
compound to  an  Intermediate  product  Is more  easily mediated by  microorgan-
isms  than  mineralization (Fortman and  Rosenberg,  1984).  Provided  suitable
acclimation  can  be  achieved,  caprolactam can be  degraded  by  conventional
biological sewage treatment  (Thorn  and Agg, 1975).   Results of  blodegradatlon
screening  studies  Indicate   that  caprolactam  1s degraded rapidly by  accli-
mated activated sludge  (Zahn and  Wellens, 1980; Zahn and Huber,  1975; Pagga
and Guenthner, 1982; PUter, 1976).  For  example,  caprolactam at an Initial
concentration equivalent  to  200 mg/l COD underwent 94.3%  COD removal when
Incubated with  adapted  activated  sludge  1n  the  dark at 20°C  for  20 days
(PUter,  1976).   A  wide variety  of  microorganisms are known  to  degrade
caprolactam  Including  Achromobacter.  Arthrobacter,  Asperglllus.  Bacillus.
0065d                               -6-                              01/20/88

-------
CorynebacteMum and  Pseudomonas (Shama  and Wase,  1981).  A  proposed mecha-


nism for  the metabolism of caprolactam 1s shown  below (Shama and Wase, 1981).



                             a-tttoglutiHc  g1ut*»1c «cid
                              •eld             .

                                                   CHO                COO

                                                   I                 I
                                                   (CH,),              (CHj).
          	           - "I *'*        ">«^   ^S-        'j ?'<              'l t '4

                   Uctwm COON      ftninoeaproic «cid      COOH     idipic      COOt-
                                   trtnttnintsc                Mtii*ldt»ydt
                                                          dtnydro?tn«tc
        t-c«prolict«-         c-Mrinoc*proi:                  idipic              idipic
                         add                      MBitlMhydt            tcid




2.2.3.    B1oconcentrat1on.   A  BCF  of  <1 was  estimated  by using  a  measured



log  KQw  of   -0.19  (Hansch   and   Leo,   1985)  and   the  linear . regression


equation,  log  BCF  =  0.76 log KQW  -  0.23 (Lyman  et  al., 1982).   This  BCF



value  suggests  that  bloaccumulatlon  of  caprolactam  In  aquatic  organisms


would not be significant.


2.2.4.    Adsorption.   Considering  the relatively  high water  solubility  of


caprolactam  [5.25x106   mg/l   (Jones,  I960)]   and  Its  estimated  KQC   value


of  0.8   (Section   2.3.3.),  physical  adsorption   to  suspended  solids   and


sediments 1s not expected  to be significant.



2.3.   SOIL



2.3.1.    Chemical   Degradation.   Amides  may   be  susceptible   to  chemical


hydrolysis  under  environmental  conditions  (Lyman  et  al.,   1982);  however,


lack  of   quantitative kinetic  data  precludes  determination of  the  signifi-


cance of  this  reaction.


2.3.2.    Blodegradatlon.   Although  no  quantitative  kinetic  data  on   the


blodegradatlon of  caprolactam  1n  natural   soil  are  available,  based  on  Us


blodegradatlon 1n  aquatic media  (see  Section 2.2.2.),  blodegradatlon   1s



expected  to be a significant loss process In soil as  well.


2.3.3.    Adsorption.   The  K    for  caprolactam  was  estimated  to  be  0.8  by


using  a  log K   of  -0.19  (Hansch and Leo, 1985)  and  the linear  regression
0065d                                -7-                               01/20/88

-------
equation,  log  KQC  = 0.544  log K    - 0.006  (Lyman et  al., 1982).   Based
on  this  KQC  value, caprolactam  1s expected  to  be highly  mobile 1n  soil
(Swann et al., 1983).
2.4.   SUMMARY
    If released  to  air,  this compound  Is  expected  to exist  almost entirely
1n the vapor phase  (E1senre1ch  et al.,  1981).   The half-life  for caprolactam
vapor  reacting   with  photochemically  generated  hydroxyl   radicals   was
estimated to  be  3.5 days  (U.S.  EPA,  1987a).   Small amounts  of  the compound
may  be  removed by  wet  deposition.   Reaction with  ozone  and  removal  by  dry
deposition are not  expected to be  significant  fate processes.   If released
to water, aerobic blodegradatlon and chemical degradation  are expected to be
significant   removal  mechanisms   (t-i/o  Qf   <1<^  weeks)   (Fortman   and
Rosenberg, 1984).   Bloaccumulatlon 1n  aquatic  organisms  and adsorption  to
suspended  sol Ids  and sediments  should  not be  significant.   If  released  to
soil,  caprolactam  may  undergo  significant  blodegradatlon.   Based  on  Us
               •
estimated  low K    value,  residual  caprolactam   In  soil  may  leach  Into
groundwater.
0065d                               -8-                              06/16/87

-------
                                 3.   EXPOSURE

    Pertinent  data  regarding human  exposure  to  caprolactam by  Inhalation,
1ngest1on of contaminated food or dermal contact  could  not  be  located  1n  the
available literature as  dted  In Appendix  A.   This compound may  be  released
to the environment 1n the effluent from production and  use  facilities  and In
leachate from waste disposal sites (Abrams  et  a!., 1975).
3.1.   WATER
    Caprolactam was qualitatively Identified  In drinking water  In the  United
States  (Kopfler  et  a!., 1977;  Shackelford and Keith,  1976) and  In Germany
(Kool et al.,  1982).  The  U.S.  EPA STORET Data Base  reports 110  occurrences
of  caprolactam  1n  whole  water   samples  (U.S.  EPA,  1987b).   The  minimum,
maximum  and  mean concentrations detected  were  500.0,  1000.0  and   513.6
vg/l,  respectively.   This  compound   was  detected  1n  surface  waters  down-
stream  from a tire  fire runoff  zone In  Winchester, VA  (Peterson  et al.,
1986).   Caprolactam  was  detected  at  a   concentration  of  36-150  yg/J.   1n
the final effluent of a  dye  manufacturing  plant In Massachusetts  during July
1976  (Games  and  Hltes,  1977).   It was  also  detected In effluent  water from
landfill sites In Delaware  (Shackelford  and Keith, 1976).
3.2.   SUMMARY
    Caprolactam  may  be  released to  the   environment  In the  effluent from
production  and use facilities  and  1n  leachates  from  waste disposal  sites
(Abrams et  al.,  1975).   This compound was  detected 1n  drinking water  In  the
United States  and In  Germany (Kopfler  et  al.,  1977; Shackelford  and  Keith,
1976; Kool  et  al., 1982),  surface waters  downstream  from a  tire  fire  runoff
zone  1n  Virginia (Peterson  et   al.,  1986),   the  final  effluent  from  a  dye
manufacturing  plant   1n  Massachusetts   (Games  and   Hltes,   1977)  and  the
effluent water from landfill sites In Delaware (Shackelford  and Keith,  1976).

0065d                               -9-                               01/20/88

-------
                             4.  AQUATIC TOXICITY
4.1.   ACUTE TOXICITY
    Pertinent  data  regarding  acute  toxlclty  of  caprolactam  to  aquatic
organisms  could not  be  located 1n  the available  literature  as  cited  In
Appendix A.  The  only  Information  available was  a  statement  by  Loewengart
(1984)  that  caprolactam had  a "low toxic  potential"  1n bluegllls,  Lepomls
macrochlrus.   fathead  minnows,   Plmephales   promelas.   channel   catfish,
Ictalurus punctatus and Daphnla magna.
4.2.   CHRONIC EFFECTS
    Pertinent  data  regarding chronic  toxlclty  of  caprolactam  to  aquatic
organisms  could not  be  located 1n  the available  literature  as  dted  1n
Appendix A.
4.3.   PLANT EFFECTS
    Stuplna and  Blleka (1973) reported  that growth of  the algae  Anklstro-
desmus  braunll.   Chlorella   pyrenoldosa  and   Scenedesmus   quadrlcauda   was
Inhibited  by  caprolactam concentrations  of 8-10  g/i.   At  lower  concentra-
tions, caprolactam apparently was a nitrogen source  for  these  algae,  causing
Increased total nitrogen content and protein content at  a  concentration  of 3
g/l.  Loewengart  (1984) reported that  caprolactam had  a  "low  toxic  poten-
tial" In duckweed and algae.
4.4.   SUMMARY
    Little  Information  was  available concerning  toxlclty  of  caprolactam to
aquatic organisms.  The two available studies  (Loewengart,  1984;  Stuplna and
Bllenka, 1973)  Indicated that  caprolactam was  relatively nontoxlc  to  aquatic
biota.
0065d                               -10-                             01/20/88

-------
                             5.   PHARMACOKINETICS
5.1.   ABSORPTION
    Caprolactam Is absorbed readily from the gastrointestinal  tract  of  rats.
In  the first  24  hours  after dosing, male F344 rats  that were  Intubated with
[carbonyl-14C]-caprolactam  at  0.18 mg/kg  excreted  ~77.6,  3.5  and  1.5X  of
the dose of  radioactivity  1n  the urine, feces and  expired  air,  respectively
(Unger et  al.,  1981).   Excretion 1n the urine  and  expired air was  the most
rapid during  the  first  6  hours  after treatment,  after  which  the  rate  of
excretion was reduced markedly.
    Unger et al. (1981) sacrificed rats treated  as  described above  to  deter-
mine tissue levels of  radioactivity  at 0.5, 1,  2,  3,  4,  6, 15 and  24  hours
after treatment  (Section  5.2.).   They determined a half-life  of 1.87  hours
for radioactivity  1n  the  stomach and  Us  contents.  The short  half-life  1n
the stomach  coupled  with  the  observation  that  the concentration of  radio-
activity 1n the  small  Intestine  and Us contents did  not  exceed  the concen-
tration In blood by  >35-40X 1n the first 15 hours  after  treatment  suggested
to  the  Investigators  that  passive absorption occurred rapidly directly from
the stomach.   A whole-body autoradlography  study  1n  mice  (Waddell  et  al.,
1984)  also  Indicated  that  [carbonyl-14C]-caprolactam 1s  absorbed rapidly
from the gastrointestinal  tract,  particularly  from  the stomach.  No quanti-
tative absorption data were provided.
5.2.   DISTRIBUTION
    In a  low-dose study  of the  disposition  of caprolactam,  a  group   of  40
male  F344   rats  were  orally  dosed with   [14C]-caprolactam  at  0.18   mg/kg
(Unger et  al.,  1981).   Five rats were sacrificed 0.5, 1, 2, 3,  4, 6,  15 and
24  hours after  dosing and  tissue radioactivity  was  determined.   Radioactiv-
ity levels  In  most tissues were similar to those found 1n  blood,  In which a
0065d                               -11-                             01/20/88

-------
maximum  (128 ng  equivalents caprolactam/g  tissue)  was  reached  at 1  hour
after dosing.  The exceptions were  the  stomach,  kidneys  and bladder In which
concentrations  were  higher  than  those  found  1n  the  blood,  and  adipose
tissue, In which concentrations were lower than those found In the blood.
    In  a  high-dose  experiment  (Unger  et  al.,  1981),  five rats  were  given
oral  doses  of  1.5  g/kg  [14C]-capro1actam   and  were  sacrificed  6  hours
later;  six  rats  were pretreated with  unlabeled  caprolactam at  1.5 g/kg/day
for  7  days  before  a 1.5  g/kg dose  of labeled  compound.   Results  of  this
experiment agreed with  those of the  low-dose study; most  tissue  concentra-
tions were  similar  to blood values  In  rats  receiving one  or  eight doses  of
1.5  g/kg.   An exception was the  stomach,  where 42.3%  of  the high  dose and
6.2% of  the  low  dose remained In  the  stomach  6  hours after dosing,  which
suggested  that  passive  absorption  from  the  stomach was  saturated at  the
higher  dose.   Pretreatment with caprolactam  had little effect  on distribu-
tion of radioactivity.
    Using  whole-body autoradlography,  Waddell  et  al.  (1984)  examined  the
distribution  of   [carbony1-14C]-capro1actam  1n  male  mice  and  pregnant  and
nonpregnant  female  mice.  One  nonpregnant  female  and five pregnant (gesta-
tion day  14.5) Swiss Webster   mice  were dosed  by gavage  with  [14C]-capro-
lactam  at  6.5-6.7 mg/kg.   Two male  mice were  Injected  Intravenously  with
labeled compound  at  6.4-6.9  mg/kg.   Pregnant  mice were frozen  and prepared
for autoradlography  20 minutes, 1.  3,  9 or 24 hours  after  dosing, while the
nonpregnant  female  mouse was frozen 3  hours  after dosing  and the male  mice
were frozen 20 minutes or 9 hours after  dosing.
    During  the first hour  after  dosing,   radioactivity   Increased 1n  the
fetuses and  brain of the dams,  but only  the  kidney  and  nasal  epithelium
showed affinity to  the   radioactivity.  After  1  hour, the  bile  ducts  In the
0065d                               -12-                             01/20/88

-------
liver were  heavily  labeled,  which Indicated hepatic  excretion.   At 3 and  9
hours, evidence of renal excretion and hepatic excretion  Into  the  Intestines
was  observed.   No evidence of  enterohepatlc  circulation  was  noted.   Levels
of radioactivity In most tissues of the dam were  decreasing, although  higher
levels were observed 1n the brain, nasal epithelium,  optic  lens, bone,  Inner
ear  and  Harderlan gland.  Radioactivity  levels  were higher  1n  the fetuses
but  decreased over  time.   At  24 hours, small residues of  radioactivity  were
present  In  the  umbilical  cord, amnlon and yolk  sac,  and  1n the optic  lens,
Harderlan gland and liver of the dam.  Results 1n  the nonpregnant  mouse  were
similar.  In  the male mice.  Intravenous  administration  resulted  In a  more
rapid equilibrium 1n tissue levels  of  radioactivity.
5.3.   METABOLISM
    Goldblatt et  al.  (1984). administered 1ntraper1toneal  doses of  12.3-17.3
mg caprolactam  nitrogen  (-99-140 mg  caprolactam)  to  rabbits  and  determined
the  cumulative  percentages  of  the doses excreted  In  the urine as  unmetabo-
11 zed compound  and  as  an  Increase  over background urinary  concentrations  of
ami no add.   Considerable  variation  was  observed  In  the  excretion  by  rats,
with urinary recovery of unmetabollzed compound accounting  for 10-65%  of the
administered  dose.   Increased  ami no  acid  excretion  over background  levels
ranged from undetectable to 60.2% of  the dose.  The excess  ami no acid  excre-
tion was  assumed to be  c-amino caprolc add.   Increased  urinary  excretion
of ami no add  was  not observed  1n  caprolactam-treated  rabbits.   Unmetabo-
llzed  compound  1n  the  urine accounted  for  <14%  of  the  administered  dose.
The  Investigators  concluded   that   rabbits  metabolize   caprolactam   more
completely than rats.
    Six  hours  after  a  0.18  mg/kg  oral  dose  of  [14C]-caprolactam,   78.1,
16.9  and 3.9%  of  the  radioactivity  1n  the  urine   of  male  F344  rats  was
0065d                               -13-                             01/20/88

-------
Identified by  HPLC  as metabolite I,  metabolite  II  and the parent  compound,
respectively  (Unger  et al.,  1981).   Metabolite  I  and II  were not  further
Identified.  In contrast, 6 hours after a 1.5 g/kg  dose 25.1,  14.1  and  55.2%
of  the  urinary radioactivity was  1n the form  of metabolite  I,  II and  the
parent compound, which suggested that the metabolic pathway for formation of
the major metabolite (metabolite I)  had  become saturated at  the higher dose.
5.4.   EXCRETION
    Goldblatt  et  al.  (1954)  examined the  urinary  excretion  of caprolactam
and ami no  add  N  1n albino rats and  rabbits following 1ntraper1toneal  doses
of caprolactam.  The  authors  found  that  rats excreted 10-65% of a  99-140 mg
caprolactam dose In  the  urine as unchanged  compound,  generally over a  2- to
5-day  period.   Comparison  of ami no  acid  N levels  with control  values In
urine Indicated that  Injections  of  caprolactam  resulted  In  the excretion of
excess ami no  adds  1n some  rats but not  In others.   The  amount   of capro-
lactam  excreted  In  the  urine,  presumably as  e-am1nocapro1c  add,  was
estimated  to  range  from  an Insignificant amount  to as much as 60.2% of  the
dose.  Together, unmetabollzed  compound  and excess  ami no add accounted  for
a  total  of -32-103%  of  the  administered  dose  over  a 2-  to  5-day  period.
Three rabbits  Injected with caprolactam  at  400  mg/kg  excreted 8.7, 22.3 and
10.1% of  the  dose  1n the urine  and  feces as the parent  compound.   No  addi-
tional ami no add N  over  background  concentrations was  detected 1n the urine.
    The  Importance  of  renal  excretion  1s  Indicated by  higher  levels of
radioactivity In the  kidneys  and bladder  than  1n other tissues of  male  F344
rats  following oral  dosing  with  [14C]-caprolactam  (Unger et  al.,  1981).
Twenty-four  hours   after  male   rats were   orally  dosed   with  0.18   mg/kg
[14C]-caprolactam,  77.6,  3.5  and 1.5% of the radioactivity had been elimi-
nated In the urine,  feces and expired air,  respectively.  In male rats  given
0065d                               -14-                             01/20/88

-------
a  1.5  g/kg dose, 13.8% of  the radioactivity was eliminated  1n  the urine  6
hours  after  dosing,  compared  with  38.6% eliminated  6  hours after  a  0.18
mg/kg  dose.   Differences  between  the two  dose  groups  1n  the excretion  of
radioactivity In  the  feces  were not  observed.   In  rats  pretreated with  1.5
g/kg caprolactam for  7  days,  0.25%  of  the  administered  radioactivity  was
excreted 1n  the  expired  air compared with  0.05% excreted 1n  rats  receiving
one dose at 1.5 g/kg.
    Autoradlography of mice killed  at  several  time  points  up  to 24  hours
after  oral  or   Intravenous   administration   of [carbonyl-14C]-capro!actam
Indicated  that  excretion  of radioactivity  occurred  efficiently through  the
kidney or  the liver (Waddell et al.,  1984).   Enterohepatlc  reclrculatlon  was
not observed.
5.5.   SUMMARY
    Pharmacoklnetlc studies  of  caprolactam  Indicate  that  the  compound  1s
rapidly and  almost completely absorbed .from  the gastrointestinal   tract  and
distributed  throughout  the  body  with peak concentrations  In most  tissues,
except the kidney  and  bladder,  similar  to blood levels  (Unger et  al.,  1981;
Waddell et al.,  1984).   No  tissue  appears  to  have  a   tendency  to  retain
caprolactam.   A  whole-body  autoradlography study using  pregnant mice  Indi-
cated  that caprolactam,  distributes  to,  but  does not concentrate In  fetal
tissues (Waddell et al.,  1984).
    Little 1s known about  the metabolism  of  caprolactam.   Goldblatt et  al.
(1954)  found an  Increase In  urinary ami no adds In rats  Injected  1ntraper1-
toneally with caprolactam so It 1s  likely  that the compound  1s hydrolyzed to
c-am1nocapro1c add.   Because  an  Increase 1n urinary ami no  adds was  not
observed In  rabbits,  Goldblatt  et  al. (1954)  suggested that  rabbits metabo-
lize caprolactam  more  completely  than rats.   Unger  et al.  (1981)  found  two
0065d                               -15-                             01/20/88

-------
unidentified metabolites and  unmetabollzed  caprolactam In the urine of  male
F344 rats  orally  dosed with  the  compound.   Caprolactam and  Its  metabolites
were excreted predominantly In  the  urine and expired air  of  rats (Goldblatt
et al., 1954; Unger et al., 1981).  Mice  excrete  caprolactam  and  Us metabo-
lites through the kidneys and  through  the liver  (Haddell  et al., 1984).
0065d                               -16-                             01/20/88

-------
                                 6.  EFFECTS
6.1.   SYSTEHIC TOXICITY
6.1.1.   Inhalation Exposures.
    6.1.1.1.   SUBCHRONIC ~ Pertinent   data   regarding   the   toxlclty   of
caprolactam following subchronlc Inhalation exposure could not  be  located  In
the available literature as cited In Appendix  A.
    6.1.1.2.   CHRONIC — Ferguson  and  Wheeler  (1973)  found no  differences
In  the  general health  of an  unspecified number  of  workers  occupatlonally
exposed to  caprolactam  vapor  over  an 18-year  period compared with unexposed
workers.   Concentrations   1n  the  factories  were  measured  at  0.2-12.3  ppm
(0.9-56.9  mg/m3).   Generally,  Irritation  was   not   reported  at   <7   ppm
(32 mg/m3).
    In  an  examination  of  eight caprolactam-exposed  workers,   Kelman  (1986)
found no  consistent abnormalities  In   blood  counts,  urinary  B.-mlcroglobu-
I1n  levels,  or In  liver  and  lung  function  tests.   A  few  workers  reported
eye,  nose  or  throat Irritation, and all  but  one  experienced peeling  of  the
hands and  sometimes the  feet.   The Individuals  examined  had  worked  at  the
factory between  9 months  and  13 years  (mean  4.8 years).   Caprolactam  dust
levels, measured  with  a   static  sampler, were  found  to  range from  22-168
mg/m3.  Dust levels of 6-131 mg/m3  were found  with personal samplers.
    Gross  (1984)   summarized  a  number  of Russian   studies of  caprolactam
exposed workers   (Martynova,  1972;  Bashurov,  1964;  Spath,  1967;  Antonova,
1968; PestM,  1970; Petrov,  1975).   Exposure levels varied from below  the
MAC  of  10 mg/m3  to peak  levels as high  as  400  mg/m3.  Exposures  to other
compounds Including dlnyl  (a mixture of dlphenyl  and  dlphenyl  oxide),  cyclo-
hexane, cyclohexanol,  cylcohexanone, benzene, acetone  and  trlchloroethylene
were  commonly  reported.  High  noise  levels,  temperatures and  humidity  were
0065d                               -17-                             01/20/88

-------
also  reported  1n  some  factories.   Effects  noted  Included  neurological
effects  (neurosis,  neurasthenia,  autonomlc  vascular  dystonla,  polyneurltls
and polyradlculltls), gynecological  effects  (Section 6.5.). gastrointestinal
effects  (nausea,  heartburn,  ulcers and  chronic gastritis),  cardiovascular
effects  (sinus  bradycardla,  hypotension and  palpitation)  and dermatologlcal
and 1mmunolog1cal changes.
6.1.2.   Oral Exposures.
    6.1.2.1.   SUBCHRONIC — In  an  early  subchronlc  study  (Goldblatt  et
al.,  1954),  a group  of six rats  was  provided with  caprolactam  1n drinking
water at  0.75 g/100 ml  for  70 days.  A  second  group of  six  rats  served as
controls.   Fluid  Intake,  measured  throughout  the  study, was  found to  be
lower 1n  treated  rats.   Initial average  body weight of both  groups  of  rats
was  124 g.   By  70  days,  the  treated  rats weighed less  than  controls.
Following  the  treatment period, all rats  were not treated for 20  days.  At
the end  of the  recovery period, weights  of  treated rats  Increased  to  near
the control  level,  Indicating to  the  Investigators that  the  weight  differ-
ence  observed  at  the end  of  the exposure period  was a result of  decreased
water Intake  In  the caprolactam-treated rats and was  completely  reversible.
This  Is  supported by  an additional phase  of  the  study 1n  which the original
control  rats  were treated for  29  days,  while the  first treatment  group was
left  untreated.   Body weights at  the  end of  this  period  were lower  In the
treated  rats  compared  with  the untreated rats.   No  other  parameters  were
examined In this study.
    Wljnands and  Feron  (1969) fed  an  unspecified number  of  male  and female
CIVO  Wlstar  rats  caprolactam  1n  their  diets  for  28  days  at  0.2-5.0%
(170-3800  mg/kg/day).   Body  weights of  rats fed  >1%  were  depressed;  the
depression was greater  In  males than females.  Liver  weights  were  Increased
0065d                               -18-                             01/20/88

-------
1n males at >1% and  1n  females  at  5%.   Kidney weights  were Increased 1n both
sexes  at  1%t  and  hyaline droplet  degeneration  1n  the  epithelium of  the
proximal convoluted tubules occurred at >1% 1n both sexes.
    In  other   studies,  male  and  female  CIVO  Ulstar  rats  were  fed  diets
containing caprolactam  at  0.1-2.0% (110-1700 mg/kg/day; 1% =  980  mg/kg/day)
(De  Knecht-van  Eekelen and  van  der  Meulen,  1970)   and  male  and  female
Sprague-Dawley  rats  were   fed   diets   containing  caprolactam  at  0.05-1.0%
(50-710 mg/kg/day; 1% = 700 mg/kg/day)  (De  Knecht-van  Eekelen  et  al.,  1971).
Both  strains  of  rats  showed  weight depression  at 1%.  CIVO  male  rats  had
Increased  liver  weight at  0.3%, while female  CIVO rats  and  both  sexes  of
Sprague-Dawley rats had Increased  liver weight at  1%.   In  CIVO males,  kidney
weights  were   Increased  at >1%,  and  hyaline  droplet  degeneration  1n  the
epithelium of  the  proximal  convoluted tubules  was observed  at  >0.3%.   In
Sprague-Dawley male  rats,  kidney weights were  Increased at 1%, and hyaline
droplet  degeneration  1n  the  epithelium  of  proximal  convoluted  tubules
occurred  at  >0.05%.   Kidney  effects  were  not  noted  1n  females  of  either
strain of  rats.   The  significance  of the  kidney  effects 1s not clear because
Increases  In urinary proteins  were not  observed.
    To further explore  the effects of  caprolactam on  renal  function.  Powers
et  al.  (1984)  conducted  a  subchronlc  study  1n   F344,  Sprague-Dawley  and
Ulstar rats.   In  this three  phase  study,  male and female rats of  all  three
strains were  fed  caprolactam  In the diet at 0,  0.01,  0.05, 0.1 or  0.5% for
90  days.   Phase  I  of the  study consisted  of resting  renal function  tests,
extracellular  volume  expansion  tests,  urine  concentrating ability  tests and
limited  pathologic  examination; all tests  were conducted  Immediately  after
the  90-day treatment  period.   In  the  resting  renal  function tests,  urine
samples collected  for  24 hours  were analyzed  for  volume,  sodium,  potassium.
0065d                               -19-                             01/20/88

-------
chloride,  protein  and  glucose  concentration,  ALP  and   LDH   activities,
osmolalHy, pH,  creatlnlne concentration and  microscopic sediment  content.
Blood samples were  analyzed  for BUN, protein, creatlnlne, sodium,  potassium
and  chloride  concentration,   hematocrH and   osmolalHy.    At   this   time,
extracellular volume expansion  studies were also conducted.   Rats were  given
1ntraper1toneal   Injections  of  Isotonlc  saline at  2.5%  of  body  weight  and
urine was collected every 3 hours for 9  hours  and analyzed for  urine volume,
sodium,  potassium, chloride, osmolalHy and creatlnlne.   In  a measurement of
urine concentrating ability, other  rats  were  placed 1n metabolism  cages  and
deprived of drinking water.   Urine  from the first 6 hours was discarded  and
the  two  consecutive  24-hour  samples   were   analyzed  for   the  parameters
examined above.   In the limited pathologic examination of the phase I  study,
six rats/straln/sex/group were  sacrificed, kidney-to-body weight  ratios were
determined and the kidneys were examined by light microscopy.  In phase I of
the study,  180  rats were used.   In  phase  II  of the study,  renal parameters
         •                                                            , .
of  caprolactam  treated  rats  were  studied  using  Invasive   techniques.   The
parameters  examined Included  urine  flow  rate,  fractional   reabsorptlon  of
water, Ion  excretion rates  and  GFR.  In phase II of the  study 240  rats were
used.  In  phase  III, phase I  procedures were  repeated In rats that were  fed
caprolactam for  90  days,  followed  by a  90-day recovery  period.  The  number
of rats  used 1n  phase III was  not  stated.
    The  results of  the  phase  I  24-hour  urlnalysls showed no effect on  renal
function  In  any of  the  three  strains of   rats  tested.   A dose-related
Increase  In  BUN  was noted  In male  F344 and Sprague-Dawley  rats  at 0.1  and
0.5%.  This  Increase was  significant (p<0.05) only 1n  Sprague-Dawley  males
at  0.5%.    Results  of   the extracellular  volume study   showed  an   abnormal
response  1n males  of  all  strains  and  In  Vllstar  females.   A dose-related
0065d                               -20-                             06/16/87

-------
decrease  1n  urine  sodium was  observed  1n  F344 males  at  all  dose  levels
(0.01, 0.05 and  0.1% p<0.05;  0.5% p<0.01).  Sprague-Dawley and Wlstar  males
showed a  dose-related  decrease 1n urine  volume  at  3 hours after  the  saline
Injection.  In Wlstar males and females,  the urine volume was  significantly
Increased  by  9  hours  postlnjectlon.   In  the  urine  concentrating  ability
test, F344 rats were the  only  strain that exhibited  effects.   A dose-related
Increase  1n  urine  volume was observed  1n  F344  males  (p<0.05)  and  urine
osmolallty was decreased at >0.05%.  A  similar response was  observed  In F344
females with  the effect  beginning  at   the 0.1%  dose level.   Kidney-to-body
weight  ratios  were  Increased  In  Sprague-Dawley  males  at  0.1   and  0.5%
(p<0.05)  and  In Wlstar males  at 0.5%  (p<0.05).   Changes 1n  kidney-to-body
weight  ratios  were  not  observed 1n  other groups.   Results of microscopic
examination of  the kidneys revealed an Increased frequency of eoslnophlUc
hyaline droplets  In the renal  tubules  of male  rats  of  all  three  strains  at
0.5%.  According to  the authors,  the degree of susceptibility  appeared to  be
Sprague  Dawley   >   F344  >  Wlstar.   The   kidneys  of female rats  were not
affected.
    The  only  change  observed  In  the   phase  II  Invasive  studies  was  lower
fractional reabsorptlon of water  when  expressed  as a kidney weight ratio  In
male F344 and Sprague-Dawley rats at 0.5%.  This  effect corresponds with the
altered urine concentrating response observed  1n  phase I.
    After a 90-day  recovery period, phase III studies revealed  no  effects  on
urine  concentrating ability.    Elevated kidney  weight  was  observed  In  male
Wlstar rats but  this effect  was less than that  observed  In  phase  I.   Micro-
scopic examination  of kidneys  of  phase  III rats  showed  recovery;  the  kidneys
appeared almost normal In all  groups.
0065d                               -21-                             01/20/88

-------
    Powers  et  al.  (1984)  stated  that  "dietary  caprolactam  Is  capable  of
altering renal function at low doses,  but  only  In  the stressed animal.   This
appears to be more of a physiological  than a  lexicological  effect 1n that  It
Is morphologically  and  functionally reversible and  does not  compromise  the
health of the animal."
    In a  13-week study by the  NTP (1982), groups of 12 F344  rats/sex  were
fed diets  containing caprolactam  at  0,  625,  1250,  2500,  5000 or 7500  ppm,
and groups of  10 B6C3F1  mice/sex were fed  diets containing  0,  5000, 10,000,
15,000, 20,000 or  30,000  ppm.   Clinical observations were made  twice  dally
and animals were weighed weekly.   Weight gain depression  (<12% for males  and
<14% for  females)  was not dose  related.   Food  consumption by  rats  fed  7500
ppm  as  compared with  controls  was   decreased  23  and  19%  for  males  and
females,   respectively.    No   compound-related  hlstopathologlc  effects  were
observed (NTP. 1982).
    In the  same  study (NTP,   1982), three  female  mice died at  doses >20,000
ppm.   A depression  In mean  body weight gain was observed  In  all  dosed  mice,
but mean  body weight  gain  was  no different  for  male  mice  fed 30,000  ppm
(36%)  than  for  those fed  5000 ppm.   However,  weight  gain depression  for
females was dose  related (NTP, 1982).
    In a  90-day  study (Burdock  et al.,  1984),  groups of four  male  and  four
female beagle  dogs  were  fed  caprolactam In the diet at 0, 0.1,  0.5 or  1.0%
(0, 32,  160  or  292  mg/kg/day 1n  males  and 0,  33,  158 or 390 mg/kg/day  In
females).   During  the  study,  the dogs were observed  for  signs   of  toxic
effects,   and  body weights  and  food  consumption  were  recorded weekly.   At
weeks  0,   5,  8  and  13,  blood   (hematocrH,  hemoglobin,  platelet   counts,
differential  leukocyte counts, total protein, albumin,  ALP,  total bHlrubln,
BUN,  calcium,  fasting  glucose,  aspartate  amlnotransferase,  alanlne  amlno-
transferase,  sodium  and potassium) and  urine  (pH,  glucose, ketones,  total

0065d                               -22-                              01/20/88

-------
protein and  blUrubln)  analyses  were completed.   Preliminary  ophthalmologlc
examinations  were  conducted.    At   the  end  of  the  study,  ophthalmologlc
examinations and  complete  necropsies were performed  on  all  dogs.  The  only
possible treatment-related effect noted In this study was  a  decrease  In  body
weight 1n females  fed  caprolactam at IX.   This effect was not statistically
significant and was  not observed 1n  males.   The other  parameters, examined.
Including food Intake,  were not affected by caprolactam treatment.
    6.1.2.2.   CHRONIC  — In  the NTP  (1982)  chronic  study,  groups   of 50
male  and  50 female  F344 rats were  fed diets  containing  caprolactam at  0,
3750 or 7500 ppm  for 103 weeks.   Groups of 50 B6C3F1  mice/sex  were fed diets
containing  caprolactam  at  0,  7500  or 15,000 ppm  for  103 weeks.   After  105
weeks,  both rats  and  mice were  sacrificed  and  comprehensive  hlstopatho-
loglcal examinations were completed.
    The results of  the  study showed weight gain depression  In both sexes  of
rats  and  mice 1n  both dose  groups.   The weight  gain  depression  was  dose-
related In  rats.   Male and  female  rats  also showed a dose-related decrease
In  food consumption  that  was  70-80%  of control  levels In  the  high-dose
groups.   Survival  of   all   groups  of  rats   and  mice  was  comparable  with
controls.    H1stolog1c  examination of  tissues did  not  reveal  any  compound-
related toxic lesions 1n either rats or mice.
6.1.3.   Other Relevant Information.  In  a   study  by Ferguson  and  Wheeler
(1973), human responses  to caprolactam at  vapor concentrations of  10-100 ppm
(46-463 mg/m3) were  examined.  Subjects were  exposed  In  monomer  or  polymer
plants  for  periods  of  30 minutes.   Concentrations of  100  ppm resulted  1n
severe discomfort  consisting of  burning nose and throat and eye Irritation.
No  eye Irritation  was  noted at  <25  ppm (116 mg/m3),  although  transient
nose  and  throat   Irritation  occurred In some  Individuals  at  levels  >10 ppm
(46 mg/m3).  At ~7 ppm  (32 mg/m3), no distress was  observed.

0065d                               -23-                             01/20/88

-------
    Tuma  et  al. (1981)  reported  a case of  dermatitis,  fever and  grand  mal
seizures  In  a  22-year-old  man  occupatlonally exposed  to  caprolactam for  3
days  (concentration  not  reported).  A comprehensive  neurological  Investiga-
tion  revealed  no CNS abnormalities.  Because convulsive disorders  have  been
observed  In  laboratory animals, and because  the  sunburned-Uke  appearance of
the  skin was   similar  to  reports  of  caprolactam Induced  dermatitis,   the
authors  concluded  that  the seizures  were  likely  a  result  of  caprolactam
exposure.
    Goldblatt et al.  (1954) exposed three  guinea  pigs  to caprolactam dust at
118-261  mg/m3,  7 hours/day for  7 days.   The guinea  pigs coughed  occasion-
ally, but no other adverse effects were noted.
    In  a 14-day study  (NTP,  1982), groups  of five  F344  rats/sex  and  five
B6C3F1 mice/sex were  fed  caprolactam In  the  diet  at 0,  5000,  10,000, 15,000,
20,000  or 30,000 ppm.  No  deaths  occurred 1n either species.   Pale mottled
kidneys  were  observed at Incidences of  60-100%  In all groups of  dosed  male
rats.  No compound-related effects were noted 1n  mice.
    Goldblatt et al.  (1954) Injected rats  Intraperltoneally with caprolactam
at  500-600  mg/kg; toxic  signs  observed  Included cries,  tremors,  apprehen-
sion, depression  of  temperature and chromodacryorrhea.  Deaths,  preceded by
convulsions, occurred at 900 mg/kg.   In  rabbits, apprehension,  salivation,
accelerated  respiration,  cries,  muscular  tremors, convulsions,  oplsthotonos
and  mydrlasls  were   observed  at  single  1ntraper1tonea1  doses  of  100-300
mg/kg.  No deaths occurred.
    Goldblatt et  al.  (1954) found that rats  Injected  Intraperltoneally  with
veronal  (sodium salt  of  5,5-d1ethyl barbituric add) at 36 mg/kg followed by
a lethal  Injection of caprolactam (1  g/kg) did not die or develop  the signs
of acute  caprolactam  toxldty.  This  protective  effect was observed up  to 2
hours after  the rats were  Injected with  veronal.  Only  1/6  rats  died  that
0065d                               -24-                             01/20/88

-------
were  Injected  with  caprolactam at  0.8  g/kg followed by  an  Injection of 36
rag/kg  veronal,  compared  with  4/6  receiving  just  0.8  g/kg caprolactam.
Severe signs  of  toxlclty were  observed 1n both  groups.   Veronal and other
barbiturates have clinical  use In  the prevention  of  convulsions.
    Kerr   et  al.   (1976),  using urethane  anaesthetized  rabbits,  found  that
caprolactam 1s a GABA antagonist;  positive field  potentials  evoked  In  the
substantla  nlgra  by   stMopalUdal   stimulation  were  blocked  following
Intravenous admlnstratlon of caprolactam.   The dose required to produce  this
response  was not  stated.
    Friedman  and Salerno  (1980)  found that  the enzymes  TAT and  TPO  were
Induced 1n  rats  given  a  single dose of caprolactam 1n  food  or water at  1.5
g/kg.  The maximum  enzyme  levels  were  observed  6  hours  postdoslng.   No
change 1n the activity  of  fructose-l,6-d1phosphatase  was  observed.   Rats
given  eight  dally   Intraperltoneal  Injections   of  caprolactam  showed an
Increase   1n  TAT  and TPO  activities after  the  first Injection,  but  by  the
eighth Injection, enzyme  activities  were comparable  with  controls.
    Acute  and LD5Q  values  for  caprolactam  are  shown   In  Table  6-1.   As
Indicated 1n the  table, the oral toxlclty  of caprolactam  1s relatively low.
6.2.   CARCINOGENICITY
6.2.1.   Inhalation.    Pertinent  data  regarding  the   cardnogenldty  of
caprolactam  following   Inhalation  exposure  could  not  be  located   1n   the
available literature  data  as cited 1n Appendix A.
6.2.2.   Oral.   In an  NTP  (1982)  carclnogenlclty study, groups  of   50  F344
rats/sex   and  50  B6C3F1 mice/sex  were  fed caprolactam 1n  their  diets for  2
years.  The  rats ate  diets  containing  caprolactam at 0,  3750 or 7500  ppm,
while  the  mice were  fed  at 0,  7500  or  15,000  ppm.   This dosing  regimen  did
not  result In significantly  Increased  tumor  Incidences  1n either   rats or
0065d                               -25-                             01/20/88

-------
                                   TABLE  6-1
                     Acute and 1059 Values  for  Caprolactam
Species/Strain/Sex
Mouse/NR/NR
Mouse/NR/NR
Mouse/NR/NR
Mouse/NR/NR
Mouse/NR/NR
Mouse/B6C3Fl/male
Mouse/B6C3Fl/female
Rat/F344/male
Rat/F344/female
Rat/F344/NR
Rat/NR/NR
Route of
Administration
Inhalation
Intraperltoneal
Intravenous
subcutanous
oral
oral
oral
oral
oral
oral
oral
1050 Value
0.45 mg/l
(450 mg/m3)*
0.58 g/kg
0.48 g/kg
0.75 g/kg
1.2 g/kg
(LD100)
2.07 g/kg
2.49 g/kg
1.65 g/kg
1.21 g/kg
-2.5 g/kg
1.15 g/kg
Reference
Lomonova, 1966
Hohensee, 1951
Hohensee, 1951
Hohensee, 1951
Hohensee, 1951
NTP, 1982
NTP, 1982
NTP, 1982
NTP, 1982
Friedman and
Salerno, 1980
Bormann and
Loeser, 1959
*Durat1on of exposure not reported
0065d
-26-
01/20/88

-------
mice,  and according  to  NTP,  1t  1s  highly  likely  that  the  animals  were
receiving the maximum tolerated dose.
6.2.3.   Other Relevant Information.   Additional  data  concerning  the card-
nogenldty of  caprolactam could  not be  located  1n the available  literature
as cited 1n Appendix A.
6.3.   MUTAGENICITY
    Hutagenldty data  for caprolactam are  summarized  1n Table 6-2.   Capro-
lactam  was  one of  several  chemicals  tested  In  a  large  number  of  mutation
assays  1n an  International  collaborative  program sponsored  by  the  Inter-
national  Programme  for Chemical  Safety  (IPCS).   All  of  these  studies  are
found In Progress  1n Mutation Research, as  cited  1n the reference  section.
    Negative results were found  In  all mutation assays 1n  Salmonella  typhl-
imirlum  (Venltt  et  al.,  1985), and  In mltotlc  gene  conversion,  chromosome
aneuploldy, mltotlc  segregation  and mitochondria! mutation studies  In  yeast
(Parry  et al.,  1985).   Positive  results  1n assays'for  nuclear mutation were
observed  1n  one  strain  of  yeast.   Caprolactam  tested  positive  In  three
studies  of  somatic  recombination  and mutation  1n Drosophlla melanoqaster
(Vogel et al., 1985).
    In  studies  using  mammalian  cells,  negative  results  were  reported  In
assays  for DNA  single-strand breaks, unscheduled DNA  synthesis (Williams  et
al.,  1985),  sister  chromatld  exchange  (Dean  et al.,  1985),  gene  mutation
(Garner et al.,  1985)  and metabolic  cooperation (Elmore and Nelmes,  1985).
An  Increased  number of chromosomal  aberrations  were  noted In human  lympho-
cytes  and Chinese  hamster  lung  cells,  but  not  In other  cell types  tested
(Dean  et  al.,  1985).   Cell  transformation assays  1n  Syrian hamster  embryo
cells  were  also  positive (McGregor  et  al.,  1985),    although  negative  or
equivocal results  were found  1n  C3H10T1/2,  Balb/c 3T3,  Fischer  rat  embryo
and CHO cells.

0065d                               -27-                              01/20/88

-------
                                                        TABLE 6-2
                                     Nutagentclty Testing of Caprolactara (>99X pure)
Assay
Reverse and
forward
mutation
Nilotic gene
conversion
Chromosome
aneuploldy
Hltotlc
segregation
Nuclear
nutation
Mitochondria!
mutation
Somatic
recombination
and mutation
DMA single-
strand breaks
Unscheduled
ONA synthesis
Indicator /Organism
Salmonella typhl-
myrlum strains
TA97. 98. 100.
102. 1535. 35.
37. 38. TN677
Saccharorevces
cerevlslae strains
JD-1. 0-7
S. cerevlslae
strains 061 -N. D-6
S. cerevlslae
strains 061 -H. 0-6
S. cerevlslae
strains 06. 061 -N.
XV185-14C. PN52.
07; Saccharomyces
pombe strain PI;
Asperglllus
nldulans strain 35
S. cerevlslae
Ttraln 05
Drosophlla
roelanogaster
rat hepatocytes.
CHO
Hela cells, male
rat hepatocytes
Application
plate Incorpora-
tion, pretncuba-
tlon. treat and
plate
treat and plate
treat and plate
treat and plate
treat and plate
Asperglllus
treatment on
solid medium
treat and plate
acute feeding of
larvae or con-
tinuous feeding
of larvae
cultures exposed
1-3 hours
cultures exposed
2.5-18 hours
Concentration/ Activating
Dose System
30-10.000 n9/ »S-9
plate
maximum *S-9
2000 pg/mt
maximum +S-9
5000 vg/nt
maximum »S-9
15.000 vg/l
maximum tested . .+S-9
In negative
studies 2000
vg/mt. lowest
effective con-
centration In
positive studies
100 ug/ml
max none
5000 ug/t
1-200 mg/l NA
max »S-9
11,300 pg/ot
max ±S-9
10,000 vg/on
Response Comment
« Negative results were
found In five studies
conducted at five
different laboratories
• Negative results from
two laboratories
• Negative results from
two laboratories
• Negative results from
two laboratories
t XVI 85-1 4C reverse Results from six
mutation producing laboratories
arglnlne* prototrophs
» XVI 85-1 4C forward
mutations; equivocal
or negative results In
remaining strains
Results from one
laboratory
«• 1n all three tests Results from three
laboratories; endpolnts
studied: wlng-mosalclsm,
whlte-zeste eye mosaic -
Ism and white/white-
coral eye mosaic Ism
Negative results from
three laboratories
Negative results from
five laboratories
Reference
Venltt
et al..
Parry
et al..
Parry
et al..
Parry
et al..
Parry
et al..
\
Parry
et al..
Vogel
et al..
U1 11 lams
et al..
Williams
et al..
1985
1985
1985
1985
1985
1985
1985
1985
1985
(Holtzman.  F344)

-------
                                                                            TABLE
(cont.)
en
0.
Assay
Chromosomal
aberrations
Indicator/Organism Application
human lymphocytes. cultures exposed
CHO. CH lung flbro- 3-48 hours
blasts CH liver
flbroblasts. rat
liver -epithelial
like (RL4)
Concentration/ Activating
Dose System
max 16.980 pg/l »S-9
LPC 270 pg/l
human lymphocytes
LPC 12.000 pg/m
CH lung
Response
i In human lymphocytes
I In CH lung flbroblasts
= In other cell types
Comment Reference
Results from eight Dean et al..
laboratories; the 1985
results In CH lung
flbroblasts should be
Interpreted with
caution — S-9 LPC
concentration was
cytotoxlc
 I
IN;
Sister
chromatld
exchange
Mammalian
cell gene
mutation
Metabolic
cooperation
Cell trans-
formation
CHO. V79 (lung).
RL4
mouse L5178Y TK*'-;
human TK6. AHH-1;
hamster V79. CHO
CH V79 lung cells
SHE.
C3H10T1/2 cells.
Balb/c 3T3 cells.
Fischer rat embryo
CHO cell cultures
cultures exposed
1-32 hours
cultures exposed
3-28 hours
compound added
to culture 3
days -continuous
added to
cultures
max »S-9
16.980 pg/mt
max »S-9
11.320 pg/mft
max none
>2 mg/mt
max frS-9
1000 pg/mt
lowest positive
response 10 mg/mt
Results from six
laboratories
Results from 12
laboratories
Results from three
laboratories
t In SHE cells Results from eight
colony morphology laboratories; endpolnts
= or equivocal In other examined: colony morph-
assays ology, viral dependence
and altered growth In agar
Dean et .al..
1985
Garner
et al.. 1985
Elmore and
Nelmes. 1985
McGregor
et al.. 1985
    max  °  Maximum negative concentration tested;  LPC • lowest concentration Inducing structural aberration
oo
-J

-------
6.4.   TERATOGENICITY
    Khadzhleva  (1969a)  examined the  reproductive  parameters of  albino  rats
exposed  to  caprolactam by  Inhalation.  The  study was  completed using  107
female and  12  male  rats.   Groups of 46 and 40 pregnant  rats  were exposed to
caprolactam  at 473.4  and 139.2  mg/m3, respectively,  while a  group of  21
pregnant  rats  served  as  controls.   The  rats were exposed  4 hours/day  for
various  exposure regimens.   An  unspecified  number   of rats  were  exposed
beginning on  gestation  days  1-5,  while others  were  exposed  beginning  on
gestation days  6-12  or gestation day  13.   Exposures  generally continued  to
gestation day  24 or  until  parturition.   One  dam,  exposed  at   473.4  mg/m3
died  on  gestation day 21,  the  17th day of  caprolactam exposure.   Fetuses
from  this dam  had unspecified abnormalities.   After delivery, the remaining
rats  were  sacrificed and the number of corpora  lutea,  Implantation  sites,
live  and  dead  young and  fetal  weights  were determined.  The results  of  the
study  showed  a dose-related  decrease  1n the  percent  of pregnant rats,  the
average  number  of young/Utter  and  the average  fetal  weight.    The  average
duration of  pregnancy  was longer than controls 1n the  high-dose  group (27.8
vs. 23.2  days) but  shorter  (22.6 days) In the  low-dose group.   The  report
does not Indicate whether the fetuses were  examined for teratogenlc effects.
    In a teratology  study, groups of  20 mated F344 rats were dosed by gavage
with  caprolactam  In distilled  water at 0.   100,  500  or  1000  mg/kg/day  on
gestation days  6-15  (Gad et  al., 1984).   Body weights  and  food  consumption
were measured  on  gestation  days 6,  11, 15 and 20.  The  dams  were sacrificed
on gestation day  20 and  the  number  of corpora lutea,  Implants,  resorptlons
and live and dead fetuses were  determined.  Fetal  weights, crown-rump length
and sex were recorded.   The  fetuses  were examined for  gross  anomalies,  with
one-third examined  for visceral  anomalies  and two-thirds examined for  skel-
etal anomalies.  Survival of  dams at  100 and  500  mg/kg/day was  not affected.
0065d                               -30-                             01/20/88

-------
At  1000  mg/kg/day,  nine  dams died,  resulting In  a  survival rate  signifi-
cantly (p<0.05) lower than controls.  Clinical  signs  noted  In treated groups
at a slightly higher  Incidence than  1n  controls Included  urine stains, rough
hair coat,  red discharge  from  the vagina,  bloody  crust  around  the  eye(s),
mouth and nose, hunched and thin appearance,  and  depression.   A  dose-related
decrease  In  mean  body weight was  observed throughout the  study.  Mean body
weights  of  the 500  and 1000  mg/kg/day groups  were significantly  (p<0.05)
lower than  controls  at  various times during the experiment.  Food  consump-
tion In  the low-dose group was  similar to controls; while food consumption
In the middle- and high-dose  groups  was lower  than controls.  No treatment-
related  effects were noted 1n pregnancy  rate,  the number  of  corpora lutea,
the  mean number  of  Implantations  per  group or  1n  the  Incidence of  fetal
death.    The Incidence  of  resorptlons  In  the  high-dose  group  was  signifi-
cantly (p<0.05) higher  than  the  control value.  A  slight but nonsignificant
decrease  In mean  fetal  body weights  was  observed  1n  all   treated  groups
except  low-dose  females.   Crown-rump  measurements  were  slightly  but  not
significantly decreased  1n high-dose fetuses,  but  were similar  to  controls
In other  dose  groups.   Results  of  gross,  visceral  and  skeletal  examinations
did not reveal a teratogenlc effect.
    In  another study  (Gad  et  a "I.,  1984),  groups  of  25 Inseminated  New
Zealand White rabbits were dosed by  gavage with caprolactam at 0, 50, 150 or
250  mg/kg/day  on  gestation  days  6-28.   A  group  of 18  rabbits  dosed with
6-am1non1cot1nam1de  at  3  mg/kg/day  on  gestation  day 9  served   as  positive
controls.   The  does  were  sacrificed  on gestation  day  29,  and  examinations
similar  to  those  described for the  rat study  were completed.  Four  rabbits
treated  at  250  mg/kg/day  died.   Survival   1n  other  groups was not affected.
0065d                               -31-                             01/20/88

-------
High- and mid-dose rabbits had  significant  (p<0.05)  losses  of weight between
gestation  days  6 and  9.  Through  the  rest  of the  study, body weights  of
these  two  groups  continued  to be  lower  than  controls.   Body weights  of
rabbits treated at 50 mg/kg/day were  not affected.   No effects on the number
of  live  fetuses,  resorptlons or  postlmplantatlon  losses were  noted.   Fetal
weights from  the  150 and 250 mg/kg/day  rabbits were  decreased significantly
(p<0.05 and p<0.01,  respectively),  and the Incidence  of  thirteenth  ribs  was
significantly  (p<0.05)   Increased  at   250  mg/kg/day.  Caprolactam  treatment
did not affect the Incidence of  major  malformations.
6.5.   OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS
    Gross  (1984)  summarized  Russian   studies  (Hartynova,  1972;  Khadzhleva,
1969b;  Pestrl,  1970;  Nadezhdlna  and  Talaklna,   1971;  Khadzhleva,   1972;
Hartynova et  al.,  1972)  that  found gynecological effects  In  women  occupa-
tlonally  exposed  to  caprolactam and other compounds  (see Section 6.1.1.2.}.
Exposure  concentrations  fluctuated  and  were  reported  to  be  as  high  as
100-400  mg/m3  during  some  processes  and  low  as  1-10  mg/m3  at  other
times.  Adverse effects  observed 1n excess  In  exposed women as compared with
controls  were  dysmenorrhea, menorrhagla,  ollgomenorrhea  and  obstetrical
complications   Including  postpartum  hemorrhage,   toxemia   of   pregnancy,
premature birth and Inadequate uterine contractions during labor.
    Rats  exposed  to  caprolactam at  425-525  or  120-150  mg/m3  developed  a
shortening  of  the  rutting  phase  and  a  lengthening of  the  resting  phase
(Khadzhleva,  1969a;  Martynova et  al..  1972).   The   number  of  follicles  1n
these rats were reduced, and the number of corpora  lutea were Increased.
    Serota  et  al.  (1984)  conducted  a 3-generat1on  study of  caprolactam  In
which groups  of 10 male and 20 female F344 rats were fed caprolactam In  the
diet at  0,  1000,  5000 or  10,000 ppm  for 10 weeks  before mating.   The  first
0065d                               -32-                             01/20/88

-------
Utter  (F-ja)  was  sacrificed  and gross  necropsies were  conducted on  about
one-third of the pups.  The parental  generation was mated a  second time 7-13
days  after  the first  Utter  was sacrificed.  Ten male  and  20  female  rats,
selected  from  the  second  Utter (F,. )  served as the  P- generation,  while
the  remaining  pups were  sacrificed.   At  weaning of  the F,.   pups,  the  P,
rats  were  sacrificed  and  complete  necropsies were performed.   The P?  rats
were  fed caprolactam  at  the  same level as their  parents.  After  10 weeks  of
treatment,  the   P~  rats   were  mated   twice  as  described   for  the  P,
generation,  except that  the  P2 rats  were  not  necropsled.   The P.  rats,
selected  from  the F2b  generation,  were treated  for  10  weeks  and  mated
twice.   Gross  necropsies  Including  kidney weights were completed on  about
half  of  the F,..  pups.   The  remaining  pups  and  the  P«   rats were discarded
without necropsy.  All Utters were observed  and  the  number  of  live and dead
pups,  body  weights and  evidence of abnormality  were  recorded  on days  1,  7
and 21 of lactation.
    Lower mean body weights and  food  consumption  of both sexes  were observed
1n  the  Pp  and  P~  generations treated  at  5000  and  10,000  ppm.    Body
weights were significantly lower  (p<0.05)  1n  most offspring  of  the high-dose
group and In some  offspring of the  middle-dose group  at  various times.   Body
weight and  food consumption  were not  affected In rats  treated  at 1000 ppm.
Gross  examinations of all  three generations  of  parental  rats revealed  no
abnormalities.  Microscopic  examination  of  kidneys  of  P,  males  treated  at
10,000 ppm  showed  a slight Increase  In  the  severity of spontaneous  nephro-
pathy,  which  was  accompanied by granular  casts In  three rats   that  were
examined.  No other hlstopathologlcal  effects were noted.
    No effects  on  pregnancy and  fertility Indices (live  birth,  neonatal and
weaning survival,  percentage  of  male  offpsrlng) were  noted.  Hale  and  female
pup body  weights  were consistently lower  at the  two highest dose levels  1n

0065d                               -33-                             01/20/88

-------
all generations.  This response was  dose-related  and  significant (p<0.05)  at
10,000  ppm.   Analysis  of  kidney-to-body  weight  ratios   In  the  F«.   pups
revealed no significant differences.
6.6.   SUMMARY
    No subchronlc Inhalation  studies  of  caprolactam toxlclty were available.
In  an occupational  study,  no  effects  on  general health  were  observed  In
workers  exposed  to  0.2-12.3  ppm  (0.9-56.9 mg/m3)  caprolactam vapor for  up
to 18 years (Ferguson and Wheeler, 1973).   Irritation,  however,  was reported
at  >7 ppm  (32  mg/m3).   Occupational  exposure  to caprolactam  dust  at  >6
mg/m3 was associated with respiratory and dermal Irritation (Kelman, 1986).
    An early  subchronlc  oral study  of  caprolactam found  that  water  Intake
and body weight  was  depressed 1n rats provided with  drinking  water contain-
ing  caprolactam  at  0.75  g/100  ml  (Goldblatt  et  al.,  1954).   No  other
parameters were examined.
    Wljnands  and Feron  (1969),  De  Knecht-van Eekelen  and  van der  Meulen
(1970) and  De Knecht-van  Eekelen et  al.   (1971)  all found hyaline  droplet
degeneration 1n  the epithelium of the  proximal  convoluted  tubules of  kidneys
In  rats  exposed  to  caprolactam 1n  the  diet at  >0.05X for  up  to 90  days.
Male  rats were more sensitive than  female rats.    Other effects  observed  at
IX  of  diet  Included  body  weight depression  and  Increased  liver and  kidney
weights.   Powers  et al. (1984)  found reversible  renal  effects  1n stressed
rats fed low  (0.01-0.5X) levels  of  caprolactam 1n  the diet  for  90  days.   In
unstressed rats, elevated BUN and hyaline  droplet  degeneration In the  kidney
occurred at 0.5X but not at 0.1% of  the diet.
    The only effects  noted  In the 13-week  NTP  (1982)  study  were weight  gain
and food Intake  depression In F344 rats  fed caprolactam  at levels >2500  ppm,
and weight gain depression  1n mice fed caprolactam at levels >5000 ppm.

0065d                               -34-                              01/20/88

-------
    In a 90-day  study  (Burdock  et  a!.,  1984), female beagle dogs fed capro-
lactam In  the diet at  154 showed an  Insignificant  decrease  In body weight.
No effects were noted  at dietary levels  <0.5X.
    In the NTP (1982)  study, weight gain and  food consumption  were  depressed
1n F344 rats  fed at 3750  and 7500  for 103  weeks.  Caprolactam  1n  the diet at
7500  and  15,000  ppm  reduced  body weight  gain  1n  B6C3F1  mice  but  had no
effect on food Intake.   No other effects were  noted.
    Acute exposures of  humans   to  caprolactam vapor at  100  ppm  (463 mg/m3)
resulted In  severe nose,  throat and  eye  discomfort  (Ferguson and Wheeler,
1973).  At  7  ppm  (32 mg/m3),  no  distress was  noted.   Tuma  et  al.  (1981)
reported a case of dermatitis,  fever and grand mal  seizures  In a  man occupa-
tlonally exposed to caprolactam for 3  days.
    Guinea pigs  exposed to caprolactam dust  at 118-261 mg/m3, 7  hours/day
for 7 days coughed occasionally (Goldblatt  et  al., 1954).
    The only  significant effect noted In rats fed caprolactam  1n  the diet at
levels >5000  ppm were  pale mottled kidneys In all groups of male rats  (NTP,
1982).  No  effects were  observed  1n  mice  at  dietary  levels  of  5000-30,000
ppm.
    Acute  toxic   signs   observed   In  rats  Injected  1ntraper1tonea11y   with
caprolactam Include cries,  tremors, apprehension, depression of temperature,
chromodacryorrhea  (500-600  mg/kg),  convulsions   and   death  (900  mg/kg)
(Goldblatt et al., 1954).   Oral  LD5Q  values  In rats  vary from 1.15   g/kg
(Bormann and Loeser, 1959) to -2.5  g/kg  (Friedman  and Salerno,  1980).
    The NTP  (1982) oral  cardnogenldty study of  caprolactam  did not result
In  Increased  tumor Incidences  In either rats  or  mice.   The cardnogenldty
of caprolactam has not been studied by any  other route of exposure.
0065d                               -35-                             01/20/88

-------
    Negative results were found  1n mutation assays  In  S.  typhlmuMum (Venltt
et  al.,  1985),  In  mltotlc gene  conversion,  chromosome aneuploldy,  mltotlc
segregation  and  mitochondria! mutation  In yeast  (Parry et  al.,  1985),  In
assays for  DNA single-strand  breaks  and unscheduled DNA  synthesis  (Williams
et al.,  1985),  sister  chromatld  exchange,  gene mutation  (Dean  et  al.,  1985;
Garner et al.,  1985)  and metabolic cooperation (Elmore and  Nelmes,  1985)  In
mammalian cells  and  cell  transformation  assays  1n  C3HTOT1/2, Balb/c  3T3,
Fischer  rat  embryo  and  CHO  cells (McGregor et al.,  1985).   Positive results
were  found  1n assays  for  nuclear mutation  1n yeast  (Parry et al.,  1985),
somatic  recombination and mutation In  D_.  melanogaster (Vogel et al.,  1985),
chromosomal  aberrations  In  human lymphocytes  and Chinese hamster  lung  cells
(Dean et al.,  1985), and cell  transformations  In  Syrian  hamster embryo  cells
(McGregor et al., 1985).
    Khadzhleva  (1969a)   reported  a  concentration-related  decrease  In  the
percent of pregnant rats, the  average  number of young/Utter and the average
fetal weight  of  fetuses from  pregnant  rats  exposed to caprolactam  vapor  at
139.2 and 473.4 mg/m3 for various segments  of  the  gestation  period.
    Gad  et al.  (1984)  completed  teratogenlclty studies 1n rats  and  rabbits.
In rats  treated  by  gavage  with caprolactam at 0, 100, 500 or  1000  mg/kg/day
on gestation days 6-12  a significant Increase was  observed  In  fetal resorp-
tlons In  the high-dose groups.   In  rabbits  treated by gavage  at 150 mg/kg/
day on gestation days 6-28, maternal  body weights  were decreased and  fetal
weights were significantly  reduced.  No effects were noted at 50 mg/kg/day.
    Gross  (1984)   summarized  Russian  studies   that  found  an  excess   of
dysmenorrhea,  menorrhagla,  ollgomenorrhea  and  obstetrical   complications  1n
women occupatlonally  exposed  to caprolactam  at  levels  ranging from  1-400
mg/m3.   Reproductive  effects  reported 1n  Russian  studies  In  rats  exposed
0065d                               -36-                             01/20/88

-------
to  caprolactam  vapor at  425-525 or  120-150 mg/m3  Include  a shortening  of
the rutting phase and a lengthening of  the  resting  phase  with an Increase In
the number of corpora lutea (Khadzhleva, 1969b,  1972).
    Results of a  3-generat1on  study  (Serota et al., 1984) showed  lower  body
weights  1n  the offspring  of  F344 rats  fed caprolactam  at  5000 and  10,000
ppm.  An Increase In the severity of  spontaneous  nephropathy  was observed 1n
parental rats at 10,000 ppm.   No other hlstopathologlcal  effects  were noted.
0065d                               -37-                             01/20/88

-------
                     7.   EXISTING GUIDELINES  AND  STANDARDS
7.1.   HUMAN
    The ACGIH  (1986a,b)  Is  currently 1n the process  of  changing the TLV-TWA
for caprolactam.   The old TLV-TWA  guideline  1s  5 ppm (20 mg/m3)  for capro-
lactam  vapor  and  1  mg/m3  for  dust,  with TLV-STELs  of 10  ppm  (40 mg/m3)
for vapor  and  3  mg/m3  for  caprolactam dust.   The  proposed  TWA  for capro-
lactam  vapor  and aerosol  Is  1  mg/m3  or 0.22 ppm  when  present as  a vapor.
No  STEL  value  Is  recommended.  The TLV Is  designed  to prevent  skin  Irri-
tation.
    Other guidelines  or  standards  for  caprolactam could not be  located  In
the available literature as cited 1n Appendix A.
7.2.   AQUATIC
    Guidelines  and  standards  for  the   protection  of  aquatic organisms  from
the effects of  caprolactam  could not be located  1n  the  available  literature
as cited 1n Appendix A.
0065d                               -38-                             01/20/88

-------
                             8.  RISK ASSESSMENT
8.1.   CARCINOGENICITY
8.1.1.   Inhalation.    Pertinent  data  regarding   the   cardnogenldty   of
caprolactam following Inhalation exposure  could not be located 1n the avail-
able literature as cited  In  Appendix A.
8.1.2.   Oral.   In the NIP  (1982) carclnogenlclty  study,  no Increased tumor
Incidences were found In male  and  female  rats  fed caprolactam at 0, 3750 or
7500 ppm and male and female mice fed at 0, 7500 or  15,000 ppm.
8.1.3.   Other   Routes.   Pertinent  data   regarding the  cardnogenldty  of
caprolactam following other  routes  of  exposure could not be  located 1n the
available literature  as cited In Appendix  A.
8.1.4.   Weight of Evidence.  Caprolactam was  negative  1n  carclnogenlclty
studies  using  rats and  mice (NTP, 1982).   The epidemlologic data  base Is
Inadequate  to  demonstrate  or  refute  carcinogenic  potential.  The  negative
results  1n  two  species receiving the maximum tolerated  dose In the presence
of  Inadequate   data  for  cardnogenesls   among  exposed  humans  permits  the
we1ght-of-ev1dence classification  of  Group  E  for  caprolactam   (U.S.  EPA,
1986b), evidence of noncarclnogenldty  for humans.
8.1.5.   Quantitative  Risk   Estimates.   Caprolactam  was  negative   1n   a
cardnogenldty  study using rats  and mice  (NTP,  1982),   and   1t  1s  not
possible to derive risk assessment  values  based  on  carclnogenlclty.
8.2.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
8.2.1.   Inhalation Exposure.
    8.2.1.1.   LESS THAN  LIFETIME  EXPOSURES (SUBCHRONIC) — Because  of  the
lack  of  data  concerning the  toxldty of caprolactam  following subchronlc
Inhalation  exposure,  the chronic  Inhalation RfD  of  0.01  mg/kg/day  or  0.7
mg/day  for  a  70 kg  human   based  on   the  ACGIH  (1986a)  proposed TLV  of  1
mg/m3 1s adopted as the  subchronlc  Inhalation RfD  (Section 8.2.1.2.).

0065d                               -39-                             01/20/88

-------
    8.2.1.2.   CHRONIC EXPOSURES — No effects  on  general  health were noted
In  workers  exposed  to  caprolactam at  0.2-12.3 ppm  over  an  18-year  period
(Ferguson and  Wheeler,  1973).   Kelman (1986) found no  consistent abnormali-
ties  1n  blood counts,  urinary B2-m1croglobul1n  levels,  or  In liver  and
lung  function  tests 1n  eight  caprolactam-exposed workers.   Several  workers
complained  of  eye,  nose or throat  Irritation and all  but  one  experienced
peeling of the hands and feet.
    In  contrast  to  the  above  studies,  Gross  (1984)  summarized  a  number  of
Russian  studies   (Martynova,  1972; Bashurov,  1964;  Spath,   1967;  Antonova,
1968; PestM,  1970;  Petrov,  1975)  1n  which effects were  reported In  workers
exposed to  caprolactam  as  well  as  to other compounds and  high noise  levels,
temperatures  and  humidity.   The   effects  observed   Included  neurological
effects,  gynecological  effects,  gastrointestinal  effects,  cardiovascular
effects and dermatologlcal and  1mmuno1og1cal changes.
    Given the  lack of appropriate experimental  data,  the proposed TLV  of  1
mg/m3 for  vapors  and dust  (ACGIH,  1986a) may  be  considered a basis  for  an
RfD for  chronic  Inhalation exposure  to  caprolactam.   The proposed TLV  of  1
mg/m3  Is  a  weak  basis  for  an RfD  because   1t  1s  designed primarily  to
prevent early  signs of  Irritation and  dermal  effects  1n  exposed  workers.
The  limited  occupational   data available,  however,  suggest  that  adverse
health  effects do  not  occur  In workers  exposed  to  vapors  at 0.2-12.3 ppm
(0.9-56.9 mg/m3)   (Ferguson  and Wheeler,  1973) or  to  dust at  6-131  mg/m3
(Kelman,  1986).   Generally, 7  ppm (32  mg/m3)  appears  to  be  the  threshold
for Irritation associated  with  exposure  to the vapor (Ferguson  and  Wheeler,
1973).  Since  the  TLV  for vapors  and  dust  of 1  mg/m3  appears  to   be the
lowest  NOAEL  for  Irritation and health  effects associated  with  exposure  to
caprolactam, 1t  1s  selected as  the  basis  of  an  RfD  for  chronic Inhalation
0065d                               -40-                             01/20/88

-------
exposure.   The  concentration  of   1  mg/m3  1s  multiplied  by  10  m3,   the
reference human Inhalation volume for a workday, and  5  days/7  days to expand
from occupational  to  continuous exposure to derive  an  equivalent  dosage  of
7.14 mg/day.   An  uncertainty  factor of  10 to  protect unusually  sensitive
humans 1s  applied  to  the equivalent dosage  of  7.14  mg/day to derive  an  RfD
for chronic Inhalation  exposure of  0.01  mg/kg/day or 0.7 mg/day  for  a 70  kg
human.   However, because  the TLV without adequate  supporting studies Is  an
Inappropriate  basis  for  the  derivation  of an RfD,  this value cannot  be
endorsed for use at this time.
8.2.2.    Oral Exposure.
    8.2.2.1.   LESS   THAN   LIFETIME   EXPOSURES   (SUBCHRONIC) — An  early
subchronlc study of caprolactam found that water Intake and body  weight  were
depressed  1n  rats  provided  with  drinking  water  containing  caprolactam  at
0.75 g/100  ml  (Goldblatt  et al.,  1954).   No other parameters were examined
In this study,  which 1s  Inadequate  for  use In risk  assessment.
    Wljnands and Feron  (1969) observed body weight depression  1n  CIVO Mlstar
rats fed  caprolactam at >1X for 28 days.  Other effects observed at  dietary
levels of  1  and 5X Included  Increased  liver and kidney weights  and  hyaline
droplet degeneration  1n the epithelium  of  the proximal convoluted  tubules.
Males were more sensitive  to all effects  noted.
    Changes 1n  body weight,  liver  and  kidney  weights, and hyaline  droplet
degeneration were also  found In 90-day studies  using  CIVO  Wlstar  (De Knecht-
van Eekelen and van der Meulen,  1970) and Sprague-Dawley rats  (De Knecht-van
Eekelen et  al., 1971).    The  most   sensitive effect,  hyaline  droplet  forma-
tion,  was  observed at >0.1X  In CIVO Wlstar rats and at  >0.05%  1n  Sprague-
Dawley rats, with males  of both strains  more sensitive than females.
0065d                               -41-                             01/22/88

-------
    In  an examination  of  renal  function  In  caprolactam-fed  male rats  of
three  strains,  Powers et  al.  (1984) found  elevated  BUN 1n rats  treated  at
>0.5X  for 90  days.   Microscopic examination  of kidneys revealed  Increased
frequencies of  hyaline  droplets 1n  renal  tubules  of male rats  of  all  three
strains at 0.5%.  The degree of  susceptibility  appeared  to  be  Sprague-Dawley
>  F344 > Wlstar.   All  kidney effects  were found  to  be reversible  1n  rats
treated  with   caprolactam In  the   diet  for  90 days  followed  by  a  90-day
recovery period.
    The only effects  noted In  the 13-week  NTP  (1982)  study  were weight  gain
and food  Intake  depression In  F344 rats fed caprolactam at  levels  >2500 ppm
and weight gain depression 1n mice fed caprolactam at levels  >5000 ppm.
    In a  90-day  study (Burdock et al., 1984),  female  beagle dogs fed capro-
lactam  1n the  diet at  1% showed an  Insignificant  decrease In  body  weight.
No  effects  were  noted  at  dietary  levels  <0.5X.   The  parameters  examined
Included  food  consumption,  blood and  urine  analyses,  ophthalmologlc examina-
tions and complete necropsies.
    Gad et  al.  (1984) completed  teratogenlclty studies  1n  which  rats  were
gavaged with caprolactam  at  0, 100, 500 or  1000 mg/kg/day on  gestation  days
6-20,  and a dose-related  decrease  1n maternal body weights  was observed.   A
slightly  Increased  Incidence  of  fetal  resorptlons  was  observed  at  1000
mg/kg/day (p<0.05).   In rabbits gavaged with 150 mg/kg/day on  gestation  days
6-28,  maternal  body weights were decreased and fetal weights  were signifi-
cantly (p<0.05) reduced.  No effects were noted at 50 mg/kg/day.
    The subchronlc  rat  studies  summarized  by Gross  (1984)  1n  which  kidney
effects were observed In  male  rats (Wljnands and Feron,  1969; De Knecht-van
Eekelen and  van der  Heulen,  1970;  De Knecht-van Eekelen  et  al.,  1971)  are
not appropriate  for  risk assessment because  Insufficient  details of  these
0065d                               -42-                             01/20/88

-------
studies were available and because the  toxlcologlcal  significance  of  hyaline
droplet formation  1n  the kidney of male  rats  1s  not clear.  [Hale rats  are
predisposed to  the "formation of hyaline  droplets,  which 1s believed  to  be
associated with  the  relatively large amount of  protein that Is excreted  by
the male kidney" (Calabrese,  1985).]
    Th'e 90-day  dog study (Burdock et al.,  1984)  1s not appropriate  for  the
derivation  of   a  subchronlc   RfD.   The  NOAEL   In  this  study was  the  0.5%
dietary level which  according to the authors  provided a dally dose  of -160
mg/kg.  This dose  level  1s above the LOAEL for fetotoxldty  1n rabbits (150
mg/kg/day) observed 1n the developmental toxldty  study (Gad et al., 1984).
    The most appropriate basis  for  an  RfD for  subchronlc  oral  exposure  1s
the kidney  function  study by Powers et  al.  (1984)  1n which  groups of  three
strains of rats  were  fed diets containing 0, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1 or 0.554 capro-
1actam for  90  days.   The only  adverse  effect  noted was a  slightly elevated
BUN, which was  statistically  significant only  In  Sprague-Dawley male  rats  at
0.5%.  The  0.1% dietary  level,  equivalent to  50 mg/kg/day assuming a food
factor for  rats of 0.05,  1s a  NOAEL.   Since  the  NOAEL of 50 mg/kg/day  Is
below  the level associated  with Increased  fetal  resorptlon  In  rats  (1000
mg/kg/day) and  below  the level  associated with fetotoxldty  In rabbits (150
mg/kg/day) (Gad  et al.,  1984),  1t can serve as the basis for the  RfD.   This
NOAEL of  50 mg/kg/day Is further supported by the  NOAEL of the  fetotoxldty
study by  Gad  et al.  (1984),  but the Powers et  al. (1984) study  design  and
critical  effects  are  more useful  for  subchronlc  RfD  calculation.  Applica-
tion of an  uncertainty  factor of 100, 10  to extrapolate from rats  to humans
and  10  to protect  unusually sensitive  humans,  results In  an  RfD for sub-
chronic oral exposure to caprolactam of  0.5 mg/kg/day,  or  35  mg/day for a 70
kg human.

0065d                               -43-                             01/20/88

-------
    8.2.2.2.   CHRONIC  EXPOSURES  —  In  the NTP  (1982)  cancer study,  weight
gain  depression  was  observed 1n  F344 rats  fed  at 3750 and 7500  ppm for  103
weeks.  Caprolactam  in  the diet  at  7500 and 15,000 ppm  reduced  body weight
gain  In  B6C3F1  mice  but had  no effect  on  food Intake.   Hlstopathologlc
effects were not observed In either rats or mice.
    Results of a  3-generat1on  study  (Serota et  a!., 1984)  showed lower body
weights 1n  the  offspring of  both sexes  of  F344  rats fed  caprolactam at 5000
and 10,000  ppm.  Parental body  weight and  food  consumption  were  also reduced
at >5000  ppm.   Body  weight  and  food consumption  were  not  affected  at 1000
ppm.   An  Increase In  the  severity of spontaneous nephropathy  was  observed 1n
P, rats at 10,000 ppm.  No other hlstopathologlcal effects were noted.
    The  lowest  chronic  LOAEL  Is the   decrease In pup  and  parental  body
weights observed 1n the  3-generat1on  study  {Serota  et al.,  1984)  In rats  fed
caprolactam at  5000  ppm.  This  effect was  not  observed  at  the  1000  ppm
level.  Multiplying the  1000  ppm level  by a 0.05  rat food  factor (U.S. EPA,
1985)  results  1n a NOAEL of  50 mg/kg/day.  This  NOAEL  Is  Identical  to  the
subchronlc  oral  NOAELs  Identified 1n a  90-day  dietary rat study (Powers et
al.,   1984)  In which  elevated  BUN was   observed 1n males  at 250  mg/kg/day
(0.5% of  diet),  and  the NOAEL of 50 mg/kg/day for  rabbits  1n  the Gad et  al.
(1984)  study.  The  Serota et al.  (1984) study was selected  for  the chronic
RfD  because  these   effects  were seen  1n  other  studies  and   this  was  a
3-generat1on study.   Dividing  the  rat   NOAEL  of 50 mg/kg/day by  an uncer-
tainty  factor  of 100  (10 for  Interspecles  extrapolation and 10  to protect
sensitive Individuals) results  In a  human  chronic  RfD of  0.5  mg/kg/day or 35
mg/day for a 70 kg human.
0065d                               -44-                             01/20/88

-------
    Confidence In this  RfD  1s  high.   The 3-generat1on study  (Serota  et  al.,
1984) was adequate.  The effect of concern was  decreased  body weight  1n  both
pups and parental  rats.  This  study  Is supported by the  NTP  (1982) study  1n
which the only  effect  noted was  decreased  body weight and  food  consumption
1n  rats  and  decreased  body weights  1n mice fed  caprolactam In the  diet  at
much higher  levels.  The  study  Is  further  supported  by  the NOAELs  of  the
subchronlc studies (Powers  et  al., 1984; Gad  et  al.,  1984).
0065d                               -45-                             01/20/88

-------
                          9.  REPORTABLE QUANTITIES
9.1.   BASED ON SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
    The  toxldty  of  caprolactam  1s  discussed  1n  Chapter  6.   Data  from
studies sufficient  In  length  and adequately reported  for  derivation of  CSs
are  summarized  1n Table  9-1.    The  major  effects  attributed  to  chronic
exposure to  caprolactam are weight  gain  depression In  rats  and mice  (NTP,
1982),  reduced  body weights  of fetuses  of  rabbits  (Gad  et  al.,  1984)  or
offspring of rats  (Serota et  al.,  1984),  Increased fetal resorptlon  In  rats
(Gad et al., 1984) and  compromised  renal  function Indicated by  elevated  BUN
1n  male rats  (Powers  et al.,  1984).   Although  chronic  data  regarding  the
effect  on  body weight  gain In  rats  and mice are available  from the  cancer
bloassay, data  from the subchronlc  (90-day)  studies are  Included  In  Table
9-1  because  the  effect occurred at  lower  levels  1n  both species  In  the
subchronlc  studies.  An  uncertainty  factor  of  10 was  applied  1n estimating
the  equivalent  human  dose  to expand to chronic  exposure  1n  the subchronlc
studies of NTP  (1982) and  Powers et  al. (1984).  CSs based on  these  effects
are presented In Table  9-2.
    CSs for  the toxldty of caprolactam were  similar,  ranging from  5.4  for
elevated BUN In  rats (Powers  et al., 1984)  to  8.8 for decreased  body weight
gain 1n  rats  (NTP, 1982).   All  CSs  corresponded  to  an  RQ  of 1000, with  the
exception of the  Powers  et  al.  (1984)  study which was a borderline CS  value
between 5 and  6.   The  CS of 8.8 associated with  reduced body  weight  gain  In
rats 1s chosen to  represent the chronic toxldty  of  caprolactam.  This  CS  Is
presented In Table 9-3.
0065d                               -46-                            01/20/88

-------
                                                            Oral Toxlclty Summary for  Caprolactam
Species/
Strain
Rat/F344

Mouse/
B6C3F1
Rat/
Sprague-
Oawley
Rat/F344


Rabbit/
NZU

Rat/F344


No. at
Sex Start
M.F 12/sex

H.F 10/sex

H 6


F 20


F 25


M.F 10 M
20 F

Average
Weight
(kg)
0.35b

0.03b

0.35b


0.18f


3.9*


0.35°


Vehicle/
Physical
State
diet

diet

diet


distilled
water

distilled
water

diet


Purity Exposure
pure >2500 ppa In the
diet for 13 weeks
pure >SOOO ppm In the
diet for 13 weeks
NR 0.5X of diet for
90 days

NR 1000 ng/kg/day by
gavage on gesta-
tion days 6-15
NR 150 ng/kg/day by
gavage on gesta-
tion days 6-28
NR 5000 ppn In the
diet for three
generations
Transformed
Animal Dose
(mg/fcg/day)
125C

650e

250C


1000


150


250e


Equivalent
Human Dosea
(mg/kg/day)
2.14<1

4.90d

4.27d


137.0


57.3


42.7


Response
Height gain depression

Uelght gain depression

Elevated BUN


Increased fetal resorptlon


Maternal and fetal body
weights decreased

Lower mean body weights
of offspring

Reference
NTP. 1982

NTP. 1982

Powers
et al.. 1984

Gad et al..
1984

Gad et al..
1984

Serota
et al.. 1984

Calculated by multiplying the animal  transformed dose by the cube root of the ratio of the animal body weight  to the human body weight  (70 kg).
bReference body weight (U.S.  EPA.  1985)
^Calculated using 0.05 rat food factor (U.S.  EPA. 1985)
dAn uncertainty factor was applied to  expand  from subchronlc to chronic exposure.
Calculated using 0.13 mouse  food  factor  (U.S. EPA. 1985)
^Estimated from Investigators'  data
NR = Not reported

-------
in
Q.
                                                      TABLE 9-2


                                        Oral Composite Scores for Caprolactam
I\J
o
*v
CD
CD
Species
Rat
House
Rat
Rat
Rabbit
Rat
Transformed
Animal Dose
(mg/kg/day)
125
650
250
1000
150
250
Chronic
Human MED*
(mg/day)
150
343
299
9590
4011
2989
RVd
2.2
1.7
1.8
1
1
1
Effect
Weight gain depression.
decrease In food con-
sumption
Weight gain depression
Elevated BUN
Increased fetal resorp-
tlon
Decreased maternal and
fetal body weights
Lower mean body weights
of offspring
RVe
4
4
3
8
8
8
CS
9
7
5
8
8
8
RQ
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
Reference
NTP. 1982
NTP. 1982
Powers
et al.. 1984
Gad et al..
1984
Gad et al..
1984
Serota
et al.. 1984
     *Est1mated  by multiplying the equivalent human dose In Table 9-1 expressed In mg/kg/day by 70 kg  to  express
      the  HED In mg/day for a 70 kg human.

-------
                                  TABLE 9-3
                                 Caprolactam
           Minimum  Effective Dose (MED) and Reportable Quantity  (RQ)


Route:                  oral
Dose*:                  150 mg/day
Effect:                 decrease In  body  weight gain
Reference:       .      NTP.  1982
RVd:                    2.2
RVe:                    4
Composite Score:        9
RQ:                     1000

*Equ1valent human dose
0065d                               -49-                             01/20/88

-------
9.2.   BASED ON CARCINOGENICITY
    Caprolactam was  negative  1n carclnogenlcUy studies  1n  rats and  mice
(NTP, 1982), and no human carclnogenlcUy data  are  available.   The  compound
1s assigned an EPA classification of E ~ evidence  of noncardnogenldty  In
humans,  so  that  the derivation  of  an RQ based  on carclnogenlcUy Is not
applicable.
0065d                              -50-                             01/20/88

-------
                               10.  REFERENCES

Abrams,  E.F.,  C.V.  Derklcs,  O.K.  Fong,  et  al.   1975.   Identification  of
organic  compounds  1n  effluents  from  Industrial   sources.    Versar   Inc.,
Springfield, VA.   EPA 560/3-75-002.

ACGIH  (American  Conference of Governmental  Industrial Hyg1en1sts).   1986a.
Documentation  of  the  Threshold Limit  Values,  5th  ed.   Cincinnati,  OH.
p. 95-96; 95(86): 96.2(86).

ACGIH  (American  Conference of Governmental  Industrial Hyglenlsts).   1986b.
Threshold  Limit   Values  and  Biological   Exposure   Indices   for   1986-1987.
Cincinnati, OH.

Antonova,  A.N.   1968;   Hygienic evaluation  of  the educational  Industrial
system  of  students  1n  a  professional-technical  school  specializing  1n  the
twisting of acetate  and  capron fibers.  Hater.-Nauch.-Prakt.  Konf.  Molodykh.
G1g. Sanlt. Vrachel.  11: 279.  (CA 72:35487c)

Bashurov, A.A.   1964.   Functional  condition  of the  parenchymatous  organs  of
workers In the kapron Industry.  (Translation)   Gig.  Sanlt.   29:  42.   (Cited
1n Gross, 1984)

Bormann,  G.  and  A.  Loeser.   1959.  Monomer-polymer  studies with  e-capro-
lactam and b1s-phenol A.  Arznelmlhel-Forsh.   9: 9-13.  (CA 53:111662f)
0065d                               -51-                             01/20/88

-------
Burdock, G.A., B.A. Kulwlch, R.D. Alsaker and  P.M.  Marshall.   1984.   Ninety-
day  toxlclty  study In dogs with  caprolactam.   In.:  Proc. Symp.  2nd  Approach
Chem.  Risk Assess.:  Caprolactam and  Related  Compounds as  a  Case  Study.
p. 97-113.

Calabrese, E.J.   1985.   Toxic  Susceptibility.  Male and  Female  Differences.
John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.   336  p.

CMR  (Chemical  Marketing  Reporter).   1986.   Chemical  Profile:  Caprolactam.
October 18, 1986.

Dean,  B.J.,  N.  Danford,  G.  Douglas, et  al.   1985.  Summary  report on  the
performance of cytogenetlc assays In cultured  mammalian  cells.   Prog.  Mutat.
Res.  5: 69-83.

De  Knecht-van  Eekelen,  A.  and   H.C.  van  der Meulen.   1970.   Sub-chronic
(90-day) toxldty  study  with  caprolactam 1n albino rats.   Central  Institute
for Nutrition and Food Research,  Netherlands.   (Cited  1n  Gross,  1984)

De  Knecht-van  Eekelen,  A., H.C.  van der Meulen  and  H.P. T11.   1971.   Sub-
chronic  (90-day)  toxldty study  with  caprolactam  In  Sprague-Dawley  albino
rats.   Central  Institute for  Nutrition  and  Food  Research,  Netherlands.
(Cited 1n Gross.  1984)

Elsenrelch, S.J.,  B.B.   Looney  and  D.J.   Thornton.   1981.  Airborne  organic
contaminants of  the Great Lakes  ecosystem.   Environ.  Sc1.  Technol.   15(1):
30-38.
0065d                               -52-                             01/20/88

-------
Elmore, E. and A.J. Nelmes.  1985.  Summary report on  the  performance of  the
Inhibition of metabolic cooperation assay.   Prog.  Mutat.  Res.   5: 95-102.

Ferguson, W.S.  and O.D. Wheeler.   1973.   Caprolactam vapor exposures.   Am.
Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J.  34: 384-389.

Fischer,  W.B.   and L.  Crescentlnl.   1982.   Caprolactam.   In:  K1rk-0thmer
Encyclopedia of  Chemical  Technology,  Vol.  18,  3rd  ed.,  H.  Grayson and  D.
Eckroth, Ed.  John Wiley and Sons,  Inc.,  New York.  p.  425-436.

Fortman, L.  and  A. Rosenberg.   1984.  Fate of  e-caprolactam In the aquatic
environment.  Chemosphere.   13(1):  53-65.

Friedman,  M.A.  and  A.J.   Salerno.   1980.    Influence   of  caprolactam   on
rat-liver tyroslne  amlnotransferase  and  tryptophan oxygenase.  Food Cosmet.
Toxlcol.  18(1): 39-45.

Gad, S.C.,  W.J.  Powers, K.  Robinson,  D.G. Serota and B.R. Colpean.   1984.
Rat  and rabbit  teratology  studies  of caprolactam.    in:   Proc.  Symp.  Ind.
Approach Chem.  Risk Assess.  Caprolactam Relat.  Compd  Case Study,  p.  164-189.

Games,   L.H.  and  R.A.  HHes.   1977.   Composition, treatment efficiency  and
environmental  significance   of  dye manufacturing  plant  effluents.   Anal.
Chem.  49(9): 1433-1440.

Garner. R.C.,  D.  Amacher,  W. Caspary, et  al.   1985.  Summary report on  the
performance  of  gene mutation assays  1n  mammalian cells  In culture.   Prog.
Mutat.  Res.  5: 85-94.

0065d                               -53-                              01/20/88

-------
Goldblatt,  M.W.,  H.E.  Farquharson,   G.   Bennett   and   B.M.   Askew.    1954.
e-Caprolactam.  Br. 0. Ind.  Med.   11:  1-10.

Gross, P.   1984.  Biologic activity  of  e-caprolactam.   CrH. Rev. Toxlcol.
13(3): 205-216.

Hansch,  C.  and  A.J.  Leo.   1985.   Medchem Project.  Issue  No.  19.   Pomona
College,  Claremont CA.

Hawley,  G.G.    1981.    The  Condensed  Chemical  Dictionary,  10th  ed.   Van
Nostrand Relnhold Co., New York.   p. 191.

IARC  (International  Agency  for Research  On  Cancer).   1979a.  Monographs  on
the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans.   Caprolactam  and
Nylon 6.   IARC, WHO,  Lyons,  France.   Vol.  19,  p.  115-118.

IARC  (International Agency for Research on Cancer).  1979b.   IARC  Monographs
on  the  Evaluation of  the  Carcinogenic Risk  of  Chemicals  to  Humans   - Some
Monomers, Plastics and  Synthetic Elastomers and Acroleln.   IARC, WHO,  Lyons,
France.   Vol. 19, p.  119-130.

Jones, A.H.    1960.   Sublimation-pressure data  for organic  compounds.   J.
Chem. Eng. Data.  5:  196-200.

Kelman,  G.R.    1986.    Effects  of  human  exposure  to  atmospheric e-capro-
lactam.  Hum.  Toxlcol.  5(1):  57-59.
0065d                               -54-                             01/20/88

-------
Kerr, D.I.B., B.J. Dennis, E.L.H. Breaker, et al.  1976.  Antagonism of GABA
mediated Inhibition 1n the CNS by caprolactam derivatives.  Brain Res.  110:
413-416.

Khadzhleva,  E.D.   1969a.   Effect  of  caprolactam on  the reproductive func-
tions of albino  rats.  Hyg.  SanH.   34(7):  28-32.  (In  Russian with English
translation)

Khadzhleva,  E.D.   1969b.   Effect of caprolactam  on  the sexual cycle.  Gig.
Tr. Prof. Zabol.  13:  22.   (Cited 1n Gross,  1984)

Khadzhleva,  E.D.  1972.  Effects of caprolactam on female reproductive func-
tions.  Vopr. Gig.  Norm1rovan1ya Izuch Otdalennykh Pusledstvll Vozde1sn1ya.
p. 68.  (Cited In Gross,  1984)

Kool, H.3.,  C.F.  Van  Kreljl  and B.C.J. Zoeteman.  1982.  Toxicology assess-
ment  of organic  compounds  1n  drinking  water.   Cr1t.  Rev.  Env.  Cont.   12:
207-357.

Kopfler, F.C.,  R.G.  Helton, 3.L.  Mullaney  and  R.G.  Tardlff.   1977.  Human
exposure to water pollutants.  Adv.  Environ.  Sc1.  Technol.   8:  419-433.

Llllard, D.A.  and J.J.  Powers.   1975.   Aqueous odor  threshold  of organic
pollutants   In Industrial  effluents.  U.S. EPA,  Off.  Res.  Dev., Athens,  GA.
20 p.  EPA  660/4-75-002.
0065d                               -55-                             01/20/88

-------
Loewengart,  G.   1984.  Aquatic  toxlclty and  environmental  fate studies  —
Caprolactam.  In;.  Proc.  Symp.  Ind. Approach Chem. Risk  Assess.:  Caprolactam
Relat. Compd. Case Study, 35-52.  Ind.  Health Found., Pittsburgh, PA.   [CA
103(l):1681e]

Lomonova,  G.   1966.   Toxlclty of  Caprolactam.  G1g.  Tr.  Prof. Zabol.   10:
54-57.  (CHed In IARC, 1979b)

Lyman, W.J.,  W.F.  Reehl  and  D.H.  Rosenblatt.   1982.   Handbook of Chemical
Property Estimation  Methods.   McGraw-Hill  Book Co.,  New York.   p. 4-9,  5-5,
7-4.

Martynova,  A.P.,  V.M.  Lotls,   E.D.  Keadzhlfua  and  P.S.  Galdova.    1972.
Occupational health  of women  In  the  production of caprolactam  fibres.   G1g.
Tr. Prof. Zabol.  16: 9.   (Cited  In Gross,  1984)

McGregor,  0.,  J.  Ashby,  C.  Barrett, et  al.   1985.    Summary  report  on  the
performance  of  the  cell  transformation  assays.   Jji:  Progress In Mutation
Research.   Evaluation of Short-term  Tests  for   Carcinogens,  Vol.  5.,  D.
Ashby, et al., Ed.   WHO,  Elesvler Science Publishing, Amsterdam,  p. 103-115.

Nadezhdlna,  L.Z.  and  E.I.  Talaklna.   1971.   Status  of  the  menstrual  and
child-bearing  function   of  pregnant   female  workers   1n  the  caprolactam
Industry.  G1g.  Tr. Prof.  Zabol.   15: 43.   (Cited  In  Gross, 1984)

NTP  (National Toxicology  Program).  1982.   Carcinogenic bloassay of  capro-
lactam (CAS No.  105-60-2) F344 rats  and B6C3F1 mice  (feed  study).  NTP  Tech.
Rep. Ser. No. 214.   [Also publ. as  NIH  Publ. NIH-81-1770]

0065d                              -56-                            01/20/88

-------
Pagga, U. and W. Guenthner.  1982.  B1odegradat1on and toxldty studies with
microorganisms:   A  comparison  of  laboratory  tests  with a  treatment plant
model system.  Com. Eur.  Comm.,  Environ.  Qual.  Life.   p.  498-504.

Parry, J.M.,  P.  Arn1,  T. Brooks, et al.   1985.   Summary report on the per-
formance of the  yeast and Asperglllus assays.   Prog.  Hutat.  Res.   5: 25-46.

Pestrl,  Yu.  N.   1970.   State  of the  nervous  system of  workers producing
caprolactam.  G1g.  Tr.  Prof.  Zabol.   14:  37.   (Cited  1n Gross,  1984)

Peterson, J.C.,  D.F.  Clark  and P.S. Sleevl.   1986.   T1re fire oil monitor-
Ing: A new environmental  pollutant.   Anal.  Chem.   58(1):  70A-72A,  74A.

Petrov,  N.Y.  1975.   Health status  of  women working  In the chemical fiber
Industry according to data of  medical  examinations.   Vrach. Delo.  10: 145.
(Cited In Gross, 1984)

PHter,  P.    1976.   Determination  of   biological  degradablllty  of   organic
substances.  Water  Res.   10:  231-235.

Powers, W.J., Jr.,  J.C. Peckham,  K.H. Sllno and S.C.  Gad.   1984.   Effects  of
subchronlc  dietary caprolactam  on  renal  function.   In.:   Proc.  Symp. Ind.
Approach  Chem.  Risk Assess.:  Caprolactam  Relat.   Compd.  Case Study.  77-96
Ind. Health Found., Pittsburgh,  PA.   [CA 103(l):1681e]

R1dd1ck, J.A., W.K.  Bunge and  T.K.  Sakano.  1986.  Organic  solvents:  Physi-
cal  properties  and methods  of purification.  Ln:  Techniques of  Chemistry,
Vol. 2, 4th ed.   Wlley-Intersclence,  New York.  p.  1325.
0065d                               -57-                            01/20/88

-------
Serota, D.G., A.M.  Hoberman  and S.C. Gad.  1984.   A  three generation repro-
duction study with  caprolactam  1n  rats.   In.:  Proc.  Symp.  Ind.  Approach Chem.
Risk  Assess.:  Caprolactam Relat.  Compel.  Case Study,  191-204.    Ind.  Health
Found., Pittsburgh, PA.

Shackelford,  H.M.  and  L.H.  Keith.   1976.   Frequency  of Organic  Compounds
Identified 1n Water.  U.S. EPA,  Athens,  GA.  EPA 600/4-76-062.

Shama,  G.  and  D.A.J.  Wase.   1981.   B1odegradat1on  of  e-caprolactam  and
some related compounds: A review.  Int.  B1odeter1or. Bull.  18(1): 1-9.

Spath,  P.   1967.   An  accidental  poisoning with  perchlorocuprlc  phthalocya-
mlne  and  e-caprolactam.   Int.  Arch. Gewerbepathol.  Gewerbe Hyg.  24:  183.
(Cited In Gross, 1984)

Stuplna,  V.V. and  H.M. Blleka.   1973.   Effect  of  e-caprolactam  on  biochem-
ical  composition of some chlorococcal algae.   UKR  Bot ZH.  30(6):  751-756.
(Taken from HEEP/74-11884)

Swann, R.L., D.A. Laskowskl, P.J.  McCall,  K.  Vander Kuy and  H.J.  Dlshburger.
1983.   A  rapid method for  the estimation of  the  environmental  parameters
octanol/water partition  coefficient, soil  sorptlon  constant,  water   to  air
ratio and water solubility.  Res. Rev.  85: 17-28.

Thorn,  N.S.  and A.R.  Agg.   1975.   The  breakdown of  synthetic organic  com-
pounds 1n biological processes.   Proc. R.  Soc. Lond. B.   189: 347-357.
0065d                               -58-                             01/20/88

-------
Tuma, S.N.,  F.  Orson, F.V. Fossella  and  W. Waldhofer.  1981.   Seizures  and
dermatitis  after  exposure  to  caprolactam.   Arch.  Intern.  Hed.   141(11):
1544-1545.

Unger,  P.O.,  A.3.   Salerno  and  M.A.   Friedman.   1981.    Disposition   of
[14C]caprolactam 1n the rat.  Food Cosmet. Toxlcol.   19(4):  457-462.

U.S.  EPA.   1980.   Guidelines  and  Methodology Used  In the  Preparation  of
Health  Effect Assessment   Chapters  of  the  Consent  Decree  Water  Criteria
Documents.  Federal Register.   45(231): 49347-49357.

U.S.  EPA.   1984.   Methodology  and Guidelines  for Reportable  Quantity  Deter-
minations Based  on  Chronic  Toxlclty  Data.  Prepared by the Office of  Health
and  Environmental  Assessment,  Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office,
Cincinnati,  OH  for  the   Office  of   Solid  Haste  and  Emergency  Response,
Washington, DC.

U.S.  EPA.   1985.   Reference  Values   for  Risk Assessment.   Prepared by  the
Office  of  Health  and Environmental   Assessment,  Environmental   Criteria  and
Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH for  the  Office  of  Solid Waste, Washington,
DC.

U.S.  EPA.   1986a.   Methodology for  Evaluating Potential Carclnogenlclty 1n
Support of  Reportable Quantity Adjustments  Pursuant  to CERCLA  Section  102.
Prepared  by  the Office  of Health and Environmental Assessment,  Carcinogen
Assessment  Group,  for  the Office  of  Solid  Waste  and Emergency  Response,
Washington, DC.
0065d                               -59-                             01/20/88

-------
U.S.  EPA.   1986b.    Guidelines   for  Carcinogen  Risk  Assessment.   Federal
Register.  51(185):  33992-34003.

U.S. EPA.  1987a.  Graphical Exposure Modeling System  (GEMS).   Fate  of  Atmo-
spheric Pollutants (FAP).  Office of Toxic  Substances,  U.S.  EPA,  Washington,
DC.

U.S. EPA.  1987b.  STORET Water Quality  Database.   Online:  February,  1987.

USITC  (U.S.  International Trade  Commission).   1984.   Imports  of  Benzenold
Chemicals and Products.  1983.   USITC Publ.  1548,  Washington,  DC.

USITC  (U.S.  International  Trade  Commission).    1986.   Synthetic   Organic
Chemicals.   United  States  Production  and  Sales, 1985.   USITC Publ.  1745,
Washington, DC.

VenHt, S.,  R.  Baker,  H. Liber,  T.  Matsushlma,  G.  Probst  and  E.  Zelger.
1985.  Summary  report  on the  performance of  the bacterial mutation  assays.
In:  Progress  1n Mutation  Research.   Evaluation of   Short-term  Tests  for
Carcinogens, Vol. 5.,  D.  Ashby,  et al., Ed.  WHO, Elesvler  Science  Publish-
ing, Amsterdam,  p.  11-23.

Vogel, E.W.,  H.  Fre1,  K. Fujikawa,  et al.   1985.   Summary  report on  the
performance of the Drosophlla assays.  Prog. Mutat. Res.  5:  47-57.

Waddell,   W.J.,  C. Marlowe  and M.A.  Friedman.    1934.   The  distribution  of
[14C]caprolactam  1n  male,  female and  pregnant   mice.   Food Chem.  Toxlcol.
22(4): 293-303.

0065d                               -60-                             01/20/88

-------
Wljnands, W.C. and F.J. Feron.  1969.  Range-finding (28-day) Toxldty Study
with  Caprolactam  1n  Rats.   Central  Institute  for  Nutrition  and  Food
Research, Netherlands.   (Cited 1n  Gross,  1984)

Williams, G.M., R. Barratt, H. Bradley, et al.  1985.  Summary report on the
performance of the assays  for  DNA  damage.   Prog. Hutat. Res.  5: 59-67.

Wlndholz, M.,  Ed.   1983.   The Merck  Index,  10th ed.  Merck  and  Co., Inc.,
Rahway, NJ.  p. 243.

Zahn,  R.  and  U.  Huber.   1975.    Ring test  for  biological  degradation  of
products.  Tenslde Deterg.  12: 266-270.   (Ger.)

Zahn,  R.  and  H.  Wei lens.   1980.   Examination of  biological  degradabUHy
through  the  batch method —  Further experience  and  new  possibilities  of
usage.  Z. Wasser Abwasser Forsch.   13: 1-7.   (Ger.)
0065d                               -61-                             01/20/88

-------
                                  APPENDIX A

                              LITERATURE SEARCHED



    This  HEED  Is  based  on  data  Identified  by  computerized  literature

searches of the following:


         TSCATS
         CASR online (U.S. EPA Chemical  Activities Status  Report)
         TOXLINE
         TOXBACK 76
         TOXBACK 65
         RTECS
         OHM TADS
         STORET
         SRC Environmental Fate Data Bases
         SANSS
         AQUIRE
         TSCAPP
         NTIS
         Federal Register


These searches were conducted  1n February,  1987.   In  addition,  hand  searches

were made of  Chemical  Abstracts  (Collective Indices 5-9), and  the  following

secondary sources should be reviewed:


    ACGIH (American  Conference of Governmental Industrial  Hyglenlsts).
    1986.  Documentation  of  the Threshold  Limit  Values  and  Biological
    Exposure Indices, 5th ed.  Cincinnati, OH.

    ACGIH (American  Conference of Governmental Industrial  Hyglenlsts).
    1986-1987.  TLVs: Threshold Limit Values for  Chemical  Substances  1n
    the  Work  Environment  adopted  by  ACGIH with  Intended Changes  for
    1986-1987.  Cincinnati, OH.  Ill  p.

    Clayton,   G.D.   and  F.E.  Clayton,  Ed.   1981.   Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene and  Toxicology,  3rd  rev.  ed., Vol.  2A.  John  WHey  and
    Sons, NY.   2878 p.

    Clayton,   G.D.   and  F.E.  Clayton,  Ed.   1981.   Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene and  Toxicology,  3rd  rev.  ed., Vol.  2B.  John  Wiley  and
    Sons, NY.   p. 2879-3816.

    Clayton,   G.D.   and  F.E.  Clayton,  Ed.   1982.   Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene and  Toxicology,  3rd  rev.  ed., Vol.  2C.  John  Wiley  and
    Sons, NY.   p. 3817-5112.
0065d                               -62-                             01/20/88

-------
    Grayson,  M.  and  D.  Eckroth,  Ed.   1978-1984.  K1rk-0thmer  Encyclo-
    pedia of  Chemical Technology, 3rd ed.  John Wiley and Sons,  NY.   23
    Volumes.

    Hamilton,  A. and H.L. Hardy.  1974.  Industrial Toxicology,  3rd  ed.
    Publishing Sciences  Group,  Inc.,  Littleton,  MA.  575  p.

    IARC  (International  Agency  for  Research  on Cancer).   IARC  Mono-
    graphs on   the  Evaluation  of Carcinogenic Risk  of  Chemicals   to
    Humans.   MHO, IARC,  Lyons,  France.

    Jaber, H.M.,  U.R.  Mabey,  A.T.  L1eu,  T.W.  Chou and H.L.  Johnson.
    1984.   Data  acquisition  for  environmental  transport  and  fate
    screening for compounds  of Interest to  the Office  of Solid Waste.
    SRI   International,   Menlo   Park,   CA.   EPA  600/6-84-010.   NTIS
    PB84-243906.

    NTP  (National Toxicology  Program).   1986.   Toxicology Research  and
    Testing   Program.   Chemicals  on   Standard Protocol.    Management
    Status.

    Ouellette,   R.P.  and  J.A.  King.   1977.    Chemical  Week Pesticide
    Register.   McGraw-Hill  Book Co.,  NY.

    Sax,  I.N.   1984.  Dangerous  Properties of  Industrial  Materials,  6th
    ed.  Van  Nostrand Relnhold Co., NY.

    SRI  (Stanford  Research  Institute).   1986.  Directory  of  Chemical
    Producers.   .Menlo Park,  CA. .

    U.S.  EPA.   1986.   Report  on Status  Report 1n the  Special Review
    Program,   Registration   Standards   Program   and  the   Data  Call   1n
    Programs.    Registration  Standards  and  the Data Call  1n Programs.
    Office of Pesticide  Programs, Washington, DC.

    U.S.  EPA.   1985.  CSB Existing Chemical  Assessment Tracking System.
    Name  and  CAS Number Ordered  Indexes.   Office  of Toxic  Substances,
    Washington,  DC.

    USITC  (U.S.  International  Trade   Commission).    1985.   Synthetic
    Organic  Chemicals.   U.S.  Production  and Sales, 1984,  USITC  Publ.
    1422, Washington,  DC.

    Verschueren, K.   1983.   Handbook of  Environmental  Data  on  Organic
    Chemicals,  2nd ed.   Van  Nostrand  Relnhold Co.,  NY.

    Wlndholz,  M., Ed.  1983.  The Merck Index,  10th ed.   Merck  and Co.,
    Inc., Rahway, NJ.

    Worthing,  C.R. and  S.B. Walker, Ed.   1983.  The Pesticide  Manual.
    British  Crop Protection  Council.  695  p.
0065d                               -63-                             01/20/88

-------
    In  addition,  approximately 30  compendia of  aquatic  toxldty data  were

reviewed. Including the following:


    Battelle's  Columbus  Laboratories.   1971.   Water  Quality  Criteria
    Data  Book.   Volume  3.  Effects  of  Chemicals  on   Aquatic  Life.
    Selected  Data  from the Literature  through  1968.   Prepared  for  the
    U.S. EPA under Contract No. 68-01-0007.  Washington,  DC.

    Johnson,  W.W.  and H.T. Flnley.   1980.   Handbook  of  Acute  Toxlclty
    of  Chemicals   to  F1sh and   Aquatic  Invertebrates.    Summaries   of
    Toxlclty  Tests  Conducted  at  Columbia  National Fisheries  Research
    Laboratory.   1965-1978.   U.S.  Dept.  Interior, F1sh  and  Wildlife
    Serv. Res. Publ. 137,  Washington, DC.

    McKee, J.E. and  H.W.  Wolf.  1963.  Water Quality Criteria,  2nd  ed.
    Prepared  for   the  Resources   Agency  of  California,  State  Water
    Quality Control Board.  Publ.  No. 3-A.

    Plmental, D.  1971.   Ecological  Effects  of  Pesticides  on  Non-Target
    Species.  Prepared for the U.S.  EPA, Washington, DC.   PB-269605.

    Schneider, B.A.   1979.  Toxicology  Handbook.   Mammalian and Aquatic
    Data.  Book 1: Toxicology  Data.   Office  of  Pesticide  Programs, U.S.
    EPA, Washington, DC.   EPA 540/9-79-003.  NTIS PB 80-196876.
0065d                               -64-                             01/20/88

-------
0
9*
a.






i
i




APPENDIX B
Summary Table for Caprolactam
Species Exposure Effect RfD or qj*
Inhalation Exposure
Subchronlc NA .,. NA NA NA
Chronic NA NA NA NA
Carclnogenlclty NA NA NA NA
Oral Exposure
Subchrontc , rat 0.1X of diet for 90 days at 0.5X of diet, elevated BUN 0.5 mg/kg/day or
35 mg/day for a
70 kg human
Chronic rat 1000 ppm of diet In a at 5000 ppm of diet, reduced 0.5 mg/kg/day or
3-generatlon reproduction body weight of offspring 35 mg/day for a
study 70 kg human
Carclnogenlclty NA NA NA NA
REPORTABLE QUANTITIES
Based on Chronic Toxlclty: 1000
Based on Carclnogenlclty: NA


Reference

NA
NA
NA

Powers
et al.. 1984
Serota
et al.. 1984
NA

NTP. 1982
NA
          NA = Not applicable
rvi

00
CO

-------