-------
                                  DISCLAIMER

    This report  Is  an external  draft  for review purposes only  and does not
constitute  Agency  policy.   Mention of  trade  names  or  commercial  products
does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                      11

-------
                                   PREFACE
    Health and  Environmental  Effects  Documents  (HEEOs)  are prepared for  the
Office of Solid Waste  and  Emergency Response (OSHER).  This document  series
1s Intended to support listings under the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act  (RCRA) as  well  as to  provide  health-related  limits and goals for emer-
gency and  remedial  actions under  the Comprehensive  Environmental Response,
Compensation   and  Liability  Act  (CERCLA).    Both  published  literature   and
Information obtained from  Agency Program  Office  files are evaluated as  they
pertain to potential human health,  aquatic life and environmental effects of
hazardous waste constituents.   The  literature searched  for 1n this document
and  the  dates  searched  are  Included 1n  "Appendix:  Literature  Searched."
Literature search material  1s  current up to  8  months previous to the final
draft date  listed  on  the  front cover.   Final  draft  document dates  (front
cover) reflect the date the document 1s  sent  to  the  Program Officer (OSWER).

    Several quantitative  estimates are  presented  provided sufficient  data
are available.  For systemic toxicants, these Include Reference doses  (RfDs)
for  chronic  and  subchronlc  exposures   for   both  the  Inhalation and  oral
exposures.  The  subchronlc or  partial  lifetime  RfD,  Is  an  estimate  of an
exposure  level  that  would not  be expected  to  cause  adverse effects  when
exposure occurs during  a  limited time  Interval,  for  example, one that  does
not constitute a significant portion  of the Hfespan.   This type  of exposure
estimate has  not  been extensively  used,  or  rigorously  defined  as previous
risk  assessment  efforts   have  focused  primarily  on .  lifetime  exposure
scenarios.  Animal  data  used  for  subchronlc  estimates  generally  reflect
exposure durations  of 30-90  days.   The  general  methodology   for estimating
subchronlc RfOs 1s  the same as  traditionally  employed for  chronic estimates,
except that subchronlc data are utilized  when  available.

    In  the case  of   suspected  carcinogens,  RfOs  are  not   estimated.   A
carcinogenic  potency  factor,  or q-j*  (U.S. EPA,  1980),  Is  provided  Instead.
These potency  estimates are derived  for  both oral  and  Inhalation exposures
where possible.  In addition, unit risk estimates for air  and  drinking water
are presented  based on Inhalation and  oral data,  respectively.

    Reportable quantities  (RQs)  based on both chronic  toxldty and cardno-
genldty are derived.  The  RQ  1s used to determine the  quantity  of a  hazar-
dous substance for  which notification 1s  required 1n the  event of a release
as specified  under  the CERCLA.  These two RQs (chronic  toxldty and cardno-
genldty) represent two of  six  scores developed (the remaining four reflect
1gn1tab1lHy,   reactivity,  aquatic  toxldty,  and  acute mammalian  toxldty).
Chemical-specific  RQs reflect the lowest of these six primary  criteria.   The
methodology for chronic  toxldty and  cancer-based  RQs  are defined  1n  U.S.
EPA. 1983 and  1986a, respectively.
                                      111

-------
                              EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    Furfural  1s  a  colorless,  oily  liquid  with an  aromatic  odor, which  1s
similar  to  that  of benzaldehyde  or  almonds  (Hlndholz,  1983;  McK1ll1p  and
Sherman,  1980).   It  1s  mlsdble  with  most common  organic  solvents and  1s
slightly  soluble  In  water  (McK1ll1p and Sherman, 1980).   In  1977,  five  U.S.
manufacturers of  furfural  (at nine production sites) had  a combined  produc-
tion  range  of 41  to >210 million  pounds  (U.S.  EPA, 1977).  Currently,  two
manufacturers at  three production  sites  produce an  unknown  volume  of  this
chemical  (SRI,  1986).  Furfural  1s commercially manufactured  from agricul-
tural feedstocks  such as oat hulls,  rice  hulls,  cereal  grasses, corncobs and
sugarcane by-products (McK1ll1p  and Sherman,  1980).  The  use pattern  for
furfural  Is as  follows   (Lawler,  1977):    furfural  alcohol   (33X),  solvents
(16X), tetrahydrofuran (9%), miscellaneous (3%), and exports  (39X).
    The  dominant  environmental  fate  process  for furfural 1n the  atmosphere
is expected  to  be vapor  phase oxidation by  hydroxyl  radicals and  ozone.  In
a normal  ambient  atmosphere,  the  furfural oxidation  half-life  was estimated
to be 20.4  minutes  (U.S.  EPA,  1987a).   In water,  mlcroblal degradation  1s
likely  to be  the  dominant  fate  process.   Tests   using  four  natural  river
waters have shown  that microorganisms can  reduce an Initial  furfural  concen-
tration  of  1.0 to  0 ppm  1n  <3 days  (Ettlnger  et  al.,  1954).  Hydrolysis,
adsorption to sediment and bloconcentratlon are not  expected to  be Important.
Based on the significant  blodegradatlon  1n natural  water,  1t   1s  predicted
that  this  process  will  be  the  dominant  degradation  process  1n  soil.
Estimated K   values  (9-40)  Indicate a  very high  degree of  soil  mobility
for  furfural.   In the absence  of  degradation processes,  furfural  may  leach
through  soil  to groundwaters;  however, mlcroblal attack  of  furfural may  be
rapid enough to significantly diminish the Importance of leaching.
                                      1v

-------
    Furfural  1s  a naturally  occurring  compound.   It  Is  present In  various
essential  oils  (Wlndholz,  1983)  and  In a variety of  fruits,  such as  pine-
apples,  apples,  limes,  peaches,  strawberries,   raspberries  and  mandarin
oranges  (NRC,  1982;  Nicholas,  1973).   It was  detected  In  drinking  water
(Lucas,  1984;  Shackelford  and  Keith,  1976;  Kool  et  al.,  1982),  1n  Lake
Michigan  water   (Konasewlch   et  al.,   1978),   1n  wastewater  effluents  from
chemical,  paper  and  synthetic  rubber  manufacturing  facilities  (Shackelford
and Keith,  1976;  Keith, 1974), In  ambient air of the Southern  Black  Forest
(Juttner,  1986)  and  In tobacco smoke  (Schmeltz  et  al., 1977; Johnstone and
Pllmmer, 1959).   Furfural can be  emitted  to the ambient atmosphere  1n  dlesel
exhaust  (Graedel,  1978; Hampton  et  al., 1982),  1n   emissions  from  forest
fires (Graedel,   1978),  In  emissions from wood burning fireplaces (LIpaM et
al.,  1984;  K1e1nd1enst et   al.,   1986)  and  1n  volatile  plant   emissions
(Graedel, 1978).
    There was relatively Uttle Information available  concerning toxldty of
furfural  to  aquatic  biota.   LC.Q values  for  fish  ranged from  16  mg/i for
bluegllls, Lepomls  macrochlrus  (Turnbull  et  al.,  1954) to  29 mg/i for the
golden  orfe,  Leudscus 1dus  (Juhnke  and Ludemann, 1978).   LC5Q values for
Daphnla  magna  ranged  from  13-36  mg/i  (BMngmann  and  Kuehn,  1977;  Hessov,
1975).   The  lowest  reported   toxic   concentration   was  0.6  mg/l,  the
threshold for Inhibition of cell  multiplication 1n the flagellate protozoan,
Entoslphon  sulcaturo  (Brlngmann  and Kuehn,  1980).   Data  concerning  marine
species  could  not   be located  1n  the  available  literature  as   cited 1n
Appendix A.  The lowest concentration  reported to  be  toxic to aquatic  plant
species  was  2.7  mg/i,  the  toxldty  threshold  for  Inhibition  of  cell
multiplication 1n the  blue-green  alga,  H1crocyst1s aeruqlnosa  (Brlngmann and
Kuehn, 1978).

-------
    Furfural  appears   to   be  readily  absorbed  after  oral,   Inhalation  or
cutaneous  exposure  (Jodyn1s-L1ebert  and  Laboda,   1982;  Flek  and  Sedlvec,
1978).  Metabolism appears to be rapid, with furoylglydne the major metabo-
lite  1n  orally exposed  animals  (Jodynls-Llebert  and Laboda,  1982}  and In
humans  exposed by  Inhalation (Flek  and  Sedlvec,  1978).  2-FuranacryluMc
add  1s a  secondary metabolite  1n  humans and furolc acid Is  a metabolite of
animals, but not  of humans.   The major route of excretion after either oral
or  inhalation  exposure appears to  be the urine (Jodynls-Llebert and Laboda,
1982; Flek and Sedlvlc, 1978).  Unchanged  furfural was not Identified  1n  the
urine of humans or animals.
    Furfural  was  not  carcinogenic  1n  an 81-week   Inhalation  study  where
hamsters were  exposed  to 293 ppm  (1151  mg/ma),  7  hours/day,  5  days/week
for  52  weeks  (Feron  and  Kruysse,  1978).   The NTP (1987) has  sponsored  a
gavage  study using rats   and mice, but  hlstopathology  1s In  progress,  and
results are not available.  Sh1m1zu  (1986) reported that  livers of  rats made
clrrhotlc by dietary  pretreatment  with furfural were  more  sensitive  to  the
carcinogenic effects of FAA, as evidenced  by the occurrence of  preneoplastlc
hyperplastlc nodules In 16/16 rats  compared  with  2/16 rats treated  with  FAA
without pretreatment with  furfural.   In  an experiment In which furfural  was
coadmlnlstered with BAP Intratracheally  to hamsters,  furfural was  associated
with  a  reduced period  of latency  but not with  an  Increased  Incidence In
respiratory tumors (Feron, 1972).   Furfural, however,  did appear  to  Increase
the  Incidence of BAP-lnduced  perHracheal   tumors  In  this  study.   In  a
subsequent  experiment,  Inhalation   exposure  of  hamsters  to  furfural  had no
effect on the  Incidence of tumors  Induced  by  Intratracheal administration of
BAP or  subcutaneous administration  of  d1ethyln1trosam1ne  (Feron and  Kruysse,
1978).
                                      v1

-------
    Furfural  was  negative  (Sasaki  and  Endo,  1978;   Soska  et  al.,  1981;
Harriett  et  al., 1985),  equivocal  (Mortelmans et  al.,  1986) or  only weakly
positive (Zdzlenkka et al.,  1978; Loquet  et  al.,  1981) 1n mutation tests In
microorganisms.  Positive  results  1n a sex-linked recessive  lethal  test  and
negative  results  In  a reciprocal  translocatlon  test  were  reported In  0.
melanoqaster  (Woodruff  et  al.,  1985).   Positive results were also  reported
In CHO cells  (Stlch et  al.,  1981)  and  In human lymphocytes (Gomez-Arroyo  and
Souza,   1985).   Data   were   not   located   regarding   the   developmental   or
reproductive toxldty of furfural.
    The  olfactory  epithelium  appears  to  be  the  target  organ   1n  hamsters
exposed  to  furfural by  Inhalation.   Feron et al.  (1979) observed disruption
and atrophy  In  the olfactory epithelium of hamsters exposed  to  115  ppm  (448
mg/ma)  but   not  to  20 ppm  (77 mg/m3),  6  hours/day,  5   days/week  for  13
weeks.   Similar  lesions were observed In  hamsters exposed to a  TWA  concen-
tration  of   293  ppm  (1151  mg/m3),  7  hours/day,  5  days/week  for 52 weeks
(Feron and  Kruysse,  1978).  In  dogs,  fatty  liver degeneration  was  reported
at 130  ppm  (511 mg/m3), 6 hours/day,  5  days/week for 4 weeks  (AIHA, 1965).
No adverse  effects were reported at  63  ppm (248 mg/m3).   In humans  exposed
occupaUonally,  1.9-14  ppm  (7-53  mg/m*) has  been associated with  headache
and  Irritation  (Korenman  and  Resnlk,  1930)  and  30-130  mg/m3  has  been
associated with hepatitis and disorders of the nervous  system.
    Data Indicate  that  the liver 1s  the  target organ  of furfural In rats  and
mice exposed orally to  the compound.   In  rats  treated  by gavage with 11,  22,
45, 90 or 180 mg/kg 5  days/week  for  13 weeks,  mortality was  associated with
>90 mg/kg and  hepatocytlc  cytoplasmlc  vacuollzatlon  was seen In  all  treated
groups  (SRI,  1981a).   Mice  appear   to  be  more  resistant  than  rats when
administered  furfural   orally.   In  mice  treated  by  the   same  schedule  as

-------
rats with doses of  75,  150,  300, 600 or 1200 mg/kg, high mortality  occurred
at >600  mg/kg (SRI, 1981b).   Degenerative,  necrotlc and Inflammatory  liver
lesions were noted at >150 mg/kg but not at 75 mg/kg.
    The  available  data  do not  suggest a  carcinogenic role  for furfural.
Therefore,  according to  the  U.S.  EPA   (1986b)  guidelines  for  carcinogenic
risk  assessment,   furfural   should  be  assigned   to   EPA  Group  0,   not
classifiable as to  cardnogenldty  1n humans.   RfOs for Inhalation  exposure
to furfural  were  based  on  the NOAEL of 20 ppm  (77 mg/m3),  6  hours/day,  5
days/week  1n  the  13-week hamster   study  by  Feron  et  al.   (1979).    The
subchronlc  Inhalation  RfO was 0.1 mg/kg/day or  9 mg/day for  a 70  kg  human
and the  chronic Inhalation RfO was  0.01 mg/kg/day or 0.9 mg/day  for a  70 kg
human.   RfDs  for  oral  exposure of   hamsters  to  furfural were  based on  the
LOAEL of  11  mg/kg,  5 days/week  (7.9 mg/kg/day)  In the 13-week  gavage  study
by SRI  (1981a).   The subchronlc oral RfD  was  0.008 mg/kg/day or  0.6 mg/day
for a  70 kg human.   The  chronic oral RfO  was  0.8 yg/kg/day. Or  0.06 mg/day
for a 70 kg human.   An  RQ of  100 was based on  the hepatocellular cytoplasmlc
vacuollzatlon observed In rats at 7.9 mg/kg/day  (SRI, 1981a).

-------
                              TABLE  OF CONTENTS
1.  INTRODUCTION	    1

    1.1.   STRUCTURE AND CAS NUMBER	 .    1
    1.2.   PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES 	    1
    1.3.   PRODUCTION DATA	    2
    1.4.   USE DATA	    4
    1.5.   SUMMARY.	    4

2.  ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND TRANSPORT	    5

    2.1.   AIR	    5

           2.1.1.   Chemical Degradation Processes	    5
           2.1.2.   Physical Removal Processes. 	    5

    2.2.   WATER	 .    5

           2.2.1.   Hydrolysis	    5
           2.2.2.   Photolys1s/Photoox1dat1on 	    5
           2.3.3.   M1crob1al Degradation 	    6
           2.2.4.   Volatilization.	    7
           2.2.5.   Adsorption	    7
           2.2.6.   B1oconcentrat1on	    7

    2.3.   SOIL	    8

           2.3.1.   M1crob1al Degradation 	    8
           2.3.2.   Chemical Degradation. ....  	    8
           2.3.3.   Adsoprtlon	    8
           2.3.4.   Volatilization	    8

    2.4.   SUMMARY	    9

3.  EXPOSURE	   10

    3.1.   HATER	   10
    3.2.   FOOD	   10
    3.3.   INHALATION	   11
    3.4.   DERMAL	   11
    3.5.   SUMMARY	   11

4.  AQUATIC TOXICITY	   13

    4.1.   ACUTE TOXICITY	   13
    4.2.   CHRONIC EFFECTS	   13
    4.3.   PLANT EFFECTS	   13
    4.4.   SUMMARY	   13
                                     1x

-------
                          TABLE  OF  CONTENTS  (cont.)

                                                                       Page

5.  PHARMACOKINETCS	   16

    5.1.   ABSORPTION	   16
    5.2.   DISTRIBUTION	   16
    5.3.   METABOLISM	   16
    5.4.   EXCRETION	   17
    5.5.   SUMMARY	   17

6.  EFFECTS	   19

    6.1.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY	   19

           6.1.1.   Inhalation Exposures	   19
           6.1.2.   Oral Exposures	   22
           6.1.3.   Other Relevant Information	   24

    6.2.   CARCINOGENICITY	   25

           6.2.1.   Inhalation	   25
           6.2.2.   Oral	   25
           6.2.3.   Other Relevant Information	   25

    6.3.   MUTAGENICITY	   .27
    6.4.   TERATOGENICITY	   30
    6.5.   OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS 	   30
    6.6:   SUMMARY	   30

7.  EXISTING GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS 	 ....   33

    7.1.   HUMAN	   33
    7.2.   AQUATIC	   33

8.  RISK ASSESSMENT	   34

    8.1.   CARCINOGENICITY	   34

           8.1..1.   Inhalation	   34
           8.1.2.   Oral	   34
           8.1.3.   Other Routes	   34
           8.1.4.   Weight of Evidence	 . .  .   34
           8.1.5.   Quantitative Risk Estimates 	   35

    8.2.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY	   35

           8.2.1.   Inhalation Exposure 	   35
           8.2.2.   Oral Exposure . .	   37

-------
                           TABLE  OF  CONTENTS (cont.)

                                                                        Page

 9.  REPORTABLE QUANTITIES	   39

     9.1.   BASED ON SYSTEMIC TOXICITY 	   39
     9.2.   BASED ON CARCINOGENICITY	   43

10.  REFERENCES	   44

APPENDIX A: LITERATURE SEARCHED	   58
APPENDIX B: SUMMARY TABLE FOR FURFURAL 	 	   61
                                      x1

-------
                              LIST OF TABLES
No.                              Title                                Page
1-1     1977 U.S.  Production Data for Furfural	     3
4-1     Acute Toxldty of Furfural to Freshwater Organisms	    14
6-1     Genotoxldty  Testing of Furfural	    28
9-1     Toxldty  Summary for Furfural	    40
9-2     Composite  Scores for Furfural	    41
9-3     Furfural:  Minimum Effective Dose (MED) and Reportable
        Quantity  (RQ)	    42

-------
                             LIST OF  ABBREVIATIONS

BAP                     Benzo(a)pyrene
CAS                     Chemical Abstract Service
CHO                     Chinese hamster ovary
CS                      Composite score
DEN                     D1ethyln1trosam1ne
DNA                     DeoxyMbonuclelc add
FAA                     N-2-fluorenylacetamlde
Koc                     Soil sorptlon coefficient
Kow                     Octanol/water partition coefficient
LCso                    Concentration lethal to SOX of recipients
1050                    Dose lethal to 50% of recipients
LOAEL                   Lowest-observed-adverse-effect level
MED                     Minimum effective dose
NOAEL                   No-observed-adverse-effect  level
ppb     .                Parts per billion
ppm                     Parts per million
RQ                      Reportable quantity
RV,j                     Dose-rating value
RVe                     Effect-rating value
S6PT                    Serum glutamlc pyruvlc transamlnase
STEL                    Short-term eposure level
TLV                     Threshold limit value
TWA                     Time-weighted average
UV                      Ultraviolet

-------
                               1.  INTRODUCTION
1.1.   STRUCTURE AND CAS NUMBER
    Furfural 1s the common chemical name, but  this  compound  Is  also  known as
fural,  furfurole.  2-furaldehyde,  2-furancarbonal,  fur furaldehyde,  2-furan-
carboxaldehyde,  pyromudc  aldehyde  and artificial  oil   of  ants  (Ulndholz,
1983;  SRI,  1986).  The  structure, Molecular  weight,  empirical formula and
CAS Registry number for furfural are as follows:
Molecular weight:  96.08
Empirical formula:  CjH.O.
CAS Registry number:  98-01-1
1.2.   PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
    Furfural  Is  a  colorless,  oily liquid  with an aromatic  odor, which  Is
similar  to  that  of benzaldehyde or  almonds (Hlndholz.  1983;  McKlllIp  and
Sherman. 1980).   It 1s mlsclble with most common organic  solvents,  but  It Is
only  slightly  mlsclble with saturated  aliphatic  hydrocarbons  (McKlllIp  and
Sherman, 1980).  Selected physical properties are  listed below:
Melting point:             -36.5'C
Boiling point:             161.7*C
Specific gravity:
  (20/4°C)                 1.1598
Mater solubility (ppm)
  at 20°C:                 83,000
  at 25'C:                 77,800
Vapor pressure (mm Hg)
  at 18.5°C:               1.0
  at 20.0'C:               1.5
  at 42.6*C:               5.0
               McKlllIp and Sherman,  1980
               McK1111p and Sherman,  1980
               McKlllIp and Sherman.  1980
               McKlllIp and Sherman,  1980
               Tewarl et al.. 1982
               Perry and Green,  1984
               Weber et al..  1981
               Perry and Green.  1984
0069d
-1-
01/06/88

-------
Log Kou:                   0.41                    Hansch and Leo, 1981
Flash point:
   (open cup)               68°C                    Wlndholz, 1983
A1r conversion             1 mg/m3 = 0.251 ppm     Verschueren, 1983
factors at 20°C:           1 ppm » 3.991 mg/m3
A1r odor threshold:        0.006-5 ppm             Ruth, 1986
                           0.078 ppm (v/v)         Amoore and Hautala,  1983
Water odor threshold:      3.5 ppm                 Amoore and Hautala,  1983

    Furfural  Initially  turns  yellow  to  brown  and  then  polymerizes  on
exposure to  air and light  (Wlndholz,  1983).   The polymerization  1s  greatly
accelerated  In  the presence  of  heat,  adds   or  alkali  (Wlndholz,   1983;
R1dd1ck et at.,  1986;  McKlllIp and Sherman,  1980).   The  chemical  properties
of  furfural  are similar  to  aromatic aldehydes,  with some differences  that
are attributable to the furan ring (McK1l11p and Sherman,  1980).
1.3.   PRODUCTION DATA
    Production data are presented  In Table  1-1.   In  1977,  five U.S.  manufac-
turers of  furfural  at  nine production sites  had  a  combined production range
of  41  to >212  million pounds.  Seven  companies  Imported a minimum of  1-10
million pounds  of   this chemical  In the  United  States  In  1977.   SRI  (1986)
reported that  Pentech  Corporation  (Belle Glade, FL  and  Omaha,  NE) and the
Quaker  Oats   Co.   (Cedar   Rapids,   IA)  currently  manufacture   furfural;
Information on  the current U.S. production  volume  of this chemical was not
located.
    Furfural  1s  produced   commercially  from agricultural  source  feedstocks.
These feedstocks  Include  cereal grasses,  rice  hulls, cottonseed  hulls,  oat
hulls,  corncobs,   by-products  of  sugarcane  harvesting,  and  wood and  wood
products.    The  major   precursors   of  furfural  contained  1n  these   plant
materials are  the   pentosan  polysacchaMdes.   Commercial  dlgestors are  used
0069d                               -2-                              01/06/88

-------
                                  TABLE  1-1

                    1977  U.S. Production  Data  for Furfural*
 Producer/Location
Manufacturer/Importer
Production Range
    (pounds)
Quaker Oats
  Pasadena, TX
  Belle Glade, FL
  Cedar Rapids, IA
  Memphis, TN

  Omaha, NE

  Chicago, IL

Flambeau Paper Co.
  Park Falls, HI

Delaware City Plant
  Delaware City, DE

Lemoyne Plant
  Axis, AL

Polak's Frutal Works
  Mlddletown, NY
    manufacturer
    manufacturer
    manufacturer
    manufacturer

    manufacturer

    Importer

    manufacturer


    manufacturer


    manufacturer
    manufacturer
    and Importer
1-10 million
10-50 million
10-50 million
10-50 million

10-50 million

1-10 million

10-100 thousand


0.1-1.0 million


0.1-1.0 million


confidential
EM Laboratories
Elmsford, NY
Hercules, Inc.
Wilmington, DE
ICC Industries
New York, NY
Fallek Chem.
New York, NY
Stebblns Eng. & Mfg.
Water town. NY
Importer
Importer
Importer
Importer
Importer
confidential
confidential
confidential
none
none
*Source: U.S. EPA, 1977
0069d
      -3-
        06/25/87

-------
to  hydrolyze  the  pentosans  to pentoses,  which are subsequently cyclodehydro-
genated to furfural (McKllllp and Sherman, 1980).
1.4.   USE DATA
    The  use   pattern  for furfural  1s as  follows  (Lawler,  1977):  furfural
alcohol (33%),  solvents  (16X),  tetrahydrofuran  (9X),  miscellaneous  (3%),  and
exports  (39X).   As  a  solvent,   furfural  has  applications  1n  extraction
(petroleum and  lube oil  refining,  butadiene separation) and 1n  resin  formu-
lations  (McKllllp  and  Sherman,  1980).   The  miscellaneous   uses  Include
chemical  Intermediate use  In the synthesis  of resins  and other  chemicals
(McKllllp and Sherman, 1980).
1.5.   SUMMARY
    Furfural   1s  a  colorless,  oily liquid  with an  aromatic  odor, which  1s
similar to  that  of  benzaldehyde  or  almonds  (Wlndholz,  1983; McKllllp  and
Sherman,  1980).   It  Is  mlsdble  with  most common  organic  solvents and  1s
slightly soluble  1n water  (McKllllp  and  Sherman, 1980).   In 1977,  five U.S.
manufacturers of  furfural (at nine production sites) had  a combined  produc-
tion range of 41  to  >210 million pounds  (U.S.  EPA, 1977).   Currently,  two
manufacturers at  three production sites  produce an  unknown  volume of  this
chemical  (SRI,  1986).  Furfural  1s  commercially manufactured  from agricul-
tural feedstocks such as oat  hulls, rice  hulls,  cereal  grasses,  corncobs  and
sugarcane by-products (McKllllp  and  Sherman,  1980).  The  use pattern  for
furfural  1s  as  follows  (Lawler,  1977):  furfural  alcohol  (33X),  solvents
(16X).  tetrahydrofuran (9X), miscellaneous (3X),  and exports  (39X).
0069d                               -4-                              01/06/88

-------
                     2.  ENVIRONMENTAL FATE  AND TRANSPORT
2.1.   AIR
    Based  on  Us  relatively  high  vapor   pressures   (see   Section   1.2.),
furfural  Is  expected  to  exist almost  entirely 1n  the vapor  phase  In  the
atmosphere.
2.1.1.   Chemical  Degradation  Processes.   The  dominant  removal  mechanism
for  furfural  1n  the  atmosphere Is  expected to  be  vapor phase oxidation  by
photochemically-produced  hydroxyl  radicals   and ozone.   The  rate constants
for  the  reaction with hydroxyl radicals  and with  ozone are estimated  to  be
2.296X10"11   and   7.0x10""   cm3/molecule-sec,   respectively,   at    25°C
(U.S.  EPA,  1987a).   Given  typical  atmospheric  concentrations  of 8xl09  for
hydroxyl  radicals/cm3  and   6x10"  ozone   molecules/cm3,  an   atmospheric
furfural half-life of 20.4 minutes 1s  estimated (U.S.  EPA,  1987a).
2.1.2.   Physical  Removal  Processes.   The  relatively  high water  solubility
of  furfural  (83,000  ppm  at  20°C)  suggests  that  atmospheric  wash-out  1s
possible; however, the rapid  rate at  which  furfural reacts chemically  In the
atmosphere should preclude physical  removal.
2.2.   WATER
2.2.1.   Hydrolysis.   Pertinent data  regarding the environmental  hydrolysis
of  furfural  could not  be located  1n the available  literature  as cited  1n
Appendix A.  Aldehydes, however,  are  generally  not  susceptible  to hydrolysis
under  environmental  conditions (Lyman  et al.,  1982;  McK1l11p and  Sherman,
1980).
2.2.2.   Photolys1s/Photoox1dat1on.    Since   furfural   absorbs   UV  light  of
wavelengths  >300  nm  (Hlraoka  and  SHnlvasan,  1968),  direct  photolysis  1s
possible; however, photolysis rate  data  were  not  available  to estimate the
relative significance, 1f any, of  direct photolysis  1n water.

0069d                               -5-                              01/06/88

-------
    M111 and  Mabey  (1985)  estimated the half-life  for  the  reaction of alde-
hydes  (as a general  chemical  class)  with  hydroxyl  radicals  In sunlit natural
water  to  be between 10 and  11  days.  The reaction of  aldehydes  with peroxy
radicals  1n  natural  water,   however,  Is   not  significant  (Mill  and  Mabey,
1985).   This  suggests  that   furfural  oxidation by photochemically-produced
hydroxyl  radicals   1n  natural water  may   be  Important  1n  Us removal  from
water.
2.2.3.   M1crob1al  Degradation.   Available  data   Indicate  that  microblal
degradation will  be  an Important  and possibly  dominant  fate process  for
furfural In natural  water.
    Ettlnger  et  al.  (1954)  examined  the  blodegradatlon and  persistence  of
furfural  1n  four  natural  river  waters:   the  B1g Miami  River,  the  Little
Miami  River  and   two  Ohio   River   waters.   The  die-away  tests  Initially
Involved  treating  each water  with  1.0  ppm  furfural  and  measuring,  the
disappearance rate.   In  all  four  waters,   the furfural  concentration dropped
to  0  1n  <3  days.   Subsequent tests  measured  the disappearance  rate  upon
redoslng the  waters with 10  or 25  ppm furfural.   A  maximum of  12 days  was
required to reduce  the furfural concentration  to  zero.  Control tests  were
conducted to  determine  the  stability of furfural 1n water  1n  the absence of
seeding organisms.   A reduction of  furfural  concentration  from  1.5  to  0.1
ppm  took  >30  days  under  this condition.   Based on their test results,  the
authors  concluded  that most  surface waters  contain  organisms  that  are
capable  of  degrading  furfural and that  acclimated  organisms can  readily
destroy elevated levels of  the compound.
    Results of  the Japanese  MITI   blodegradatlon  test  (which utilizes  an
activated  sludge   Inoculum)   show   that  furfural   Is  readily  biodegradable
(Sasaki, 1978;  Kawasaki,  1980).  PUter  (1976) used  a batch  system  and  an


0069d                               -6-                              01/06/88

-------
activated  sludge  Inoculum to  test  the  blodegradabHUy of  a  number  of
organic  compounds;  the   test  results  Indicated  that   furfural  Is  readily
biodegradable.   Furfural  was  found  to  be at  least  partially degradable  by
anaerobic bacteria  1n  both the  presence and absence of  other  carbon sources
In batch bloassay tests (Benjamin et al., 1984).
2.2.4.   Volatilization.    Based  on  a vapor  pressure  of  1.5  mm  Hg and  a
water solubility of  83,000 ppm  (see Section 1.2.), the  Henry's  Law constant
for  furfural  at  20°C  was  estimated  to  be  2.3xlO~6  atm-mVmol.   This
value of  Henry's Law  constant  Indicates  that volatilization  from  water  Is
likely  to be slow, although some  significant  volatilization may occur  from
shallow  rivers.    Using  the method outlined  1n  Lyman  et al.  (1982),  the
volatilization half-life  of  furfural from a  river 1  m deep flowing 1  m/sec
with a wind  velocity of 3 m/sec  was estimated  to be 15.5 days.   The volatil-
ization  rate from deeper  bodies  of water or  less rapidly moving  bodies  of
water will  be slower.   Therefore,  with  the  exception  of shallow,  rapidly
moving bodies of water,  volatilization Is not likely to  be  competitive with
blodegradatlon In the removal  of furfural from the aquatic environment.
2.2.5.   Adsorption.  Given Us  high water  solubility  (83,000 ppm)  and low
log KQW  (0.41),  significant partitioning  of  furfural  from the  water column
to suspended partlculate matter  or to sediment 1s not  likely to occur.
2.2.6.   Bloconcentratlon.  The BCF  of  an organic chemical can  be  estimated
from the following regression  equations (Lyman et al.,  1982):
                       .  log BCF *  0.76  log KQw - 0.23                   (2-1)
                    log BCF = 2.791  - 0.564 log US (1n ppm)             (2-2)
For furfural, BCF  values  calculated  from Equations  2-1  and 2-2 are both  -1
using a  log K    of 0.41  and a water  solubility of  83,000 ppm.   These BCF
values  Indicate  that furfural  Is  not  expected to bloconcentrate  In aquatic
organisms.
0069d                               -7-                              06/25/87

-------
2.3.   SOIL
2.3.1.   M1crob1al  Degradation.   Pertinent  data  regarding  the  m1crob1a!
degradation  of  furfural   In  soil  could  not  be  located  1n  the  available
literature  as   dted   In   Appendix  A.    As   discussed  In  Section  2.2.3.,
degrading  furfural  rapidly; most surface  waters  contain  mlcroblal  organisms
that  are  capable of this  suggests  that blodegradatlon Is also  likely  to be
rapid 1n most types of soil.
2.3.2.   Chemical   Degradation.   Pertinent   data  regarding  the   chemical
degradation  of  furfural   In  soil  could  not  be  located  1n  the  available
literature as  dted In Appendix A.   Hydrolysis 1s not  likely  to occur  based
on  the  chemical  structure  of  furfural.   Given  Us  aldehyde  structure,
furfural may  be susceptible  to  free radical  oxidation 1n  soil;  however, no
data are available  to support this possibility.
2.3.3.   Adsorption.   The   K     of   an  organic  chemical   can  be  esUndated
from the following  regression equations (Lyman et al., 1982):
                     log KQC = 3.64  - 0.55 log  US  (In  ppm)               (2-3)
                        log KQC  =0.544  log KQW *  1.377                  (2-4)
For  furfural,  the  respective  K   values  calculated  from Equations 2-3  and
2-4  are  9 and  40  based  on a  water  solubility of 83,000  ppm  and  a log  K
of  0.41.   These  K    values  Indicate a  very  high degree  of  soil  mobility
(Swann  et al.,  1983);  therefore,   furfural  Is  susceptible  to  significant
leaching  1n  soil.   In the absence  of  degradation  processes,  furfural  may
leach  through  soil  to groundwaters; however, mlcroblal  attack  of furfural
may  be  sufficiently  rapid  to  significantly  diminish  the  Importance  of
leaching.
2.3.4.   Volatilization.    Given  the  vapor pressure  of furfural  (1.5  mm Hg
at  20°C),  significant  evaporation from  dry  surfaces  Is expected to  occur.
0069d                               -8-                              01/06/88

-------
Sufficient data  are  not available  to  predict the  Importance  of  evaporation
from  moist  soils, but  data  regarding  evaporation  from  water (see  Section
2.2.4.) Indicate that volatilization from moist soil may not be significant.
2.4.   SUMMARY
    The dominant  environmental  fate process  for  furfural  In  the atmosphere
Is expected  to  be vapor phase oxidation by hydroxyl  radicals  and ozone.   In
a normal  ambient  atmosphere,  the furfural oxidation  half-life was estimated
to be 20.4 minutes  (U.S.  EPA,  1987a).   In  water, mlcroblal  degradation  1s
likely  to be  the dominant  fate process.   Tests  using  four  natural  river
waters have shown  that  microorganisms can  reduce  an Initial furfural  concen-
tration of  1.0 to 0 ppm  In  <3 days  (Ettlnger  et al.,  1954).  Hydrolysis,
adsorption  to   sediment   and  bloconcentratlon  are   not   expected   to   be
Important.  Based  on the  significant blodegradatlon 1n natural water,  H  1s
predicted  that  this  process  will  be  the dominant  degradation   process  In
soil.   Estimated  K    values  (9-40) Indicate  a  very  high  degree of  soil
mobility  for  furfural.   In  the absence  of  degradation  processes,  furfural
may   leach  through  soil   to  groundwaters;   however,  mlcroblal   attack   of
furfural  may  be  rapid  enough  to  significantly  diminish the  Importance  of
leaching.
0069d                               -9-                              01/06/88

-------
                                 3.  EXPOSURE

    Furfural  1s  a naturally  occurring compound.   It  1s present  In  various
essential  oils  (Wlndholz, 1983)  and In a  variety  of fruits, such as  pine-
apples,  apples,  limes,  peaches,  strawberries,  raspberries  and  mandarin
oranges (NRC, 1982; Nicholas, 1973).
    A  National  Occupational  Hazard Survey conducted  between 1972 and  1974
estimated  that  -15,400  U.S.  workers  may  be  occupationally  exposed  to
furfural annually (NIOSH, 1984).
3.1.   HATER
    Lucas  (1984)  detected furfural  1n  Ottumwa,  IA drinking  water collected
In  September 1976.   Shackelford and  Keith  (1976)  and Kool  et  al.  (1982)
qualitatively  detected  furfural  1n  finished drinking  water,  but  did  not
specify the locations.
    Konasewlch et  al.  (1978) detected  furfural  at  a concentration of  2 ppb
In  Lake Michigan  water  collected   near  the  Chicago Central  Water  Works.
Furfural was Identified  1n  effluent  wastewaters  generated  at  unspecified
chemical and paper plants (Shackelford  and  Keith, 1976).   A furfural  concen-
tration of  1.7  ppb was  detected 1n a  wastewater  effluent from  a synthetic
rubber  manufacturing  facility  (Keith,  1974).  U.S.  EPA (1987b)  dted  only
one  reporting station  for  furfural,   where  a  concentration of  2  ppb  was
reported.
3.2.   FOOD
    As  noted  above,  furfural occurs  naturally  In  a  variety of  fruits.   It
has also been  Identified  as  a volatile component of  baked potatoes  (Coleman
et al., 1981),  fried  bacon and  pork  (Ho  et al., 1983), and  roasted  filbert
0069d                               -10-                             06/25/87

-------
nuts  (Klnlln  et  al.,  1972).   Furfural  was  detected  In  processed  cassava
products  (Dougan  et  al.,  1983); cassava,  a  root vegetable, 1s a major  food
staple of the tropics.
    Furfural was detected 1n 2/12 samples  of  human  breast  milk  (samples  were
collected from  volunteers  In Bayonne, NJ, Jersey  City, NJ, Brldgevllle.  PA
and Baton Rouge, LA (Pelllzzarl  et  al.,  1982).
3.3.   INHALATION
    Furfural  can  be emitted to  the ambient  atmosphere  1n  dlesel  exhaust
(Graedel,  1978;  Hampton  et  al.,   1982),  1n emissions  from  forest  fires
(Graedel, 1978),  In  emissions  from wood burning fireplaces (LIpaM  et  al.,
1984; Klelndlenst  et al.,  1986), and  1n  volatile plant emissions  (Graedel,
1978).  Using pine,  cedar,  oak and  ash  wood, LIpaM et al. (1984)  measured
the furfural emission rate to range from 0.030-0.225 g/kg of burned  wood.
    Furfural  was  Identified as  a  component  of  tobacco smoke  (Schmeltz  et
al., 1977;  Johnstone and  Pllmmer,  1959)  and   tobacco  (Johnstone and  Pllmmer,
1959).
    Juttner (1986) qualitatively detected  furfural  In the  ambient forest air
of  the  Southern Black Forest  In Germany.   Other  ambient   atmospheric  moni-
toring  data could not be  located  In  the  available  literature  as   cited  1n
Appendix A.
3.4.   DERMAL
    Pertinent dermal monitoring  data could not  be  located In the  available
literature as dted 1n  Appendix A.
3.5.   SUMMARY
    Furfural  1s  a naturally occurring  compound.   It  Is present In various
essential oils  (Ulndholz,  1983) and  1n  a variety  of fruits,  such  as  pine-
apples,  apples,  limes,   peaches,   strawberries,  raspberries   and   mandarin


0069d                               -11-                             06/25/87

-------
oranges  (NRC,  1982;  Nicholas,  1973).  Approximately  15,400 workers may  be
occupatlonally exposed  to  furfural  annually (NIOSH, 1984).   It  was  detected
In  drinking  water (Lucas,  1984;  Shackelford and  Keith,  1976; Kool et  al.,
1982),  In Lake  Michigan  water   (Konasewlch  et  al.,  1978),  In  wastewater
effluents from chemical, paper and  synthetic  rubber  manufacturing  facilities
(Shackelford and  Keith,  1976;  Keith, 1974),  1n  ambient  air  of  the  Southern
Black  Forest  (Juttner,  1986) and  1n tobacco  smoke  (Schmeltz et  al.,  1977;
Johnstone and Pllmmer,  1959).  Furfural  can be emitted to  the ambient  atmo-
sphere 1n dlesel exhaust (Graedel,  1978; Hampton  et  al.,  1982),  In emissions
from forest fires (Graedel, 1978),  In emissions  from wood  burning  fireplaces
(LIpaM  et   al.,  1984;  Klelndlenst  et  al.,  1986) and   In  volatile  plant
emissions (Graedel,  1978).
0069d                               -12-                             06/25/87

-------
                             4.   AQUATIC  TOXICITY
4.1.   ACUTE TOXICITY
    The  available  data concerning  toxldty  of furfural  to  freshwater fish
and  Invertebrates  are  presented  In Table 4-1.  LC5Q  values  for fish  ranged
from 16  mg/l  for bluegllls, Lepomls macrochlrus  (Turnbull et  al., 1954) to
29  mg/l  for  the  golden orfe, Leudscus Idus (Juhnke  and  Ludemann,   1978).
LC50  values  for  Daphnla   magna  ranged from 13-36   mg/l  (Brlngmann  and
Kuehn,  1977; Hessov, 1975).  The lowest  reported toxic  concentration was 0.6
mg/l,  the  threshold for  Inhibition of  cell  multiplication  In  the flagel-
late protozoan,  Entoslphon sulcatum  (Brlngmann  and Kuehn,  1980).   No data
concerning marine species were  found In the available literature.
4.2.   CHRONIC EFFECTS
    Pertinent  data  regarding chronic  toxldty of  furfural to aquatic  organ-
Isms could not be located  In the  available literature as dted  1n Appendix A.
4.3.   PLANT EFFECTS
    Brlngmann  and Kuehn (1978)  reported 8-day toxldty  thresholds of 2.7 and
31  mg/l   for  Inhibition  of cell   multiplication  In  the blue-green  alga,
H1crocyst1s aeruqlnosa. and the  green alga, Scenedesmus quadrkauda.   Brlng-
mann and  Kuehn  (1980)  reported  a  16-hour toxldty  threshold of 16 mg/l for
Inhibition of  cell  multiplication 1n the  bacteria, Pseudomonas  putlda.
4.4.   SUMMARY
    There was relatively little  Information available concerning toxldty of
furfural   to  aquatic biota.  LC5Q  values for  fish  ranged from  16 mg/l for
bluegllls, Lepomls  macrochlrus  (Turnbull et  al.,  1954)  to  29 mg/l for the
golden orfe,  Leudscus 1dus (Juhnke  and Ludemann,  1978).   LC5Q values for
Daphnla  magna  ranged  from  13-36 mg/l (Brlngmann  and  Kuehn,  1977; Hessov,
1975).    The   lowest  reported  toxic   concentration   was   0.6  mg/l,  the

0069d                               -13-                             06/25/87

-------
                                   TABLE  4-1

              Acute Toxlclty of  Furfural  to Freshwater Organisms*
       Species
Concentration
   (mg/i)
Effect
Reference
FISH
Blueglll
Lepomls macrochlrus

Mosqultoflsh
Gambusla afflnls
Golden orfe
Leuclscus Idus
Harlequin fish
Rasbora heteromorpha

16
1.2

24
29
12
23
10

48-hour LC5Q
calculated safe
concentration
96-hour LCso.
turbid water
48-hour LC5Q
48-hour LC0.
48-hour LCso
estimated thresh-

Turnbull
et al., 1954

Wallen et al.,
1957
Juhnke and
Luedemann, 1978
Alabaster, 1969
                                         old concentration
INVERTEBRATES

Flagellate protozoan
  Entoslphon sulcatum
  Euqlena qracllls
  Chllomonas paramedum
      0.6       72-hour  toxlclty
                threshold,  In-
                hibition of cell
                multiplication

   >512         killing  or
                bleaching concen-
                tration, 1  week

      3.9       toxlclty threshold
                Inhibition  of  cell
                multiplication
               Brlngmann and
               Kuehn,  1980
               HcCalla,  1965
               Brlngmann
               et al.,  1980
Water flea
Daphnla roagna





29

13

36
25
13
24-hour ECsQ,
Immobilization
24-hour EC0.
Immobilization
24-hour LCso
24-hour LCQ
72-hour LCso
Brlngmann and
Kuehnn, 1982


Brlngmann and
Keuhn, 1977
Hessov, 1975
*A11 results were determined In static exposures.
0069d
           -14-
                      06/25/87

-------
threshold for Inhibition of cell multiplication In the flagellate protozoan,
Entoslphon sulcatum (BMngmann and Kuehn,  1980).   No  data concerning marine
species  were  found In  the available literature.  The  lowest concentration
reported  to  be toxic  to  aquatic  plant  species, was  2.7  mg/i,  the  toxldty
threshold  for  Inhibition  of  cell  multiplication In  the  blue-green  alga,
HHcrocystls aeruglnosa (BMngmann and  Kuehn, 1978).
0069d                               -15-                            06/25/87

-------
                             5.  PHARHACOKINETICS
5.1.   ABSORPTION
    Jodynls-Llebert and  Laboda (1982) administered an  unspecified  oral  dose
of furfural to rats and  recovered  the equivalent  of 60X of the dose from the
urine  as  Us  metabolite,  furoylglydne.   Although  the rate  of  gastrointes-
tinal  absorption  cannot  be  determined from these  data,  these data  suggest
that  at  least 60X of an  oral dose  1s absorbed  from the  gastrointestinal
tract of rats.  Furfural appears to be absorbed  readily from the respiratory
tract.  Flek  and   Sedlvec  (1978)  measured the concentration of  furfural  In
Inspired and  expired air  of  volunteers  over  an  8-hour  period.   Pulmonary
retention,  estimated  at  77.9X, did not  appear  to be affected by either  the
concentration or  duration of exposure.
    Percutaneous   absorption  of furfural  occurs   In  humans  exposed  to  a
contaminated  atmosphere.   Flek and   Sedlvec  (1978) stated  that the  amount
absorbed by  the  skin corresponds  to  -20-30X of  the  amount retained  by  the
respiratory  tract.   Increasing the   ambient  temperature  or  the  relative
humidity Increases percutaneous uptake.   Immersion  of the  hand  In  liquid
furfural to the  level of  the  wrist  for 15 minutes resulted  In  percutaneous
absorption  of  an   amount equivalent  to that which  would  be retained  by  the
respiratory tract  during  Inhalation  of air  containing  10 mg/m3  for  8 hours
or 20 mg/m3 for 4 hours.   No other  details were  provided.
5.2.   DISTRIBUTION
    Pertinent data regarding the  tissue  distribution  of furfural  could  not
be located  In the available literature as cited  In Appendix A.
5.3.   METABOLISM
    Furoylglydne  appears  to be the  principal  metabolite of  furfural  after
oral administration to  rats  (Jodyn1s-L1ebert and Laboda,  1982); -60X of  an
unspecified dose of  furfural was   recovered  as  furoylglydne In  the  urine.
0069d                               -16-                             06/25/87

-------
Metabolites  excreted   by  other  routes  were  not  reported.   Furoylglydne
appears  to  be the  predominant  metabolite  1n  humans exposed  by Inhalation
(Flek and Sedlvek,  1978).  The  aldehyde  group  Is probably first oxidized to
an  acid  group,  which  1s  then  conjugated  with  glydne  (Brabec,  1981).   A
metabolite of secondary Importance 1n humans Is  2-furanacrylur1c add.  Both
metabolites apparently were Identified 1n  the  urine.   Dogs  and rabbits also
excrete  furolc  add.   The  metabolism of  furfural  appears  to be  rapid  as
Indicated by  a  half-life  of 2-2.5  hours  In  humans exposed  by Inhalation
(Flek and Sedlvlc, 1978).
5.4.   EXCRETION
    The major excretory route for orally administered furfural appears to be
the  urine.    About  60X  of  an   unspecified oral  dose  given  to   rats  was
recovered as  furoylglydne 1n the  urine  (Jodynls-llebert  and Laboda, 1982).
Unchanged furfural was  not  Identified  1n  the urine.
    The urine also appears  to be the major  excretory route In humans exposed
by  Inhalation (Flek  and  Sedlvec,  1978).   Metabolites,  but  not   unchanged
compound, were reported 1n the  urine.   In humans exposed by  Inhalation. <1X
of the retained  dose was exhaled as  unchanged  compound.  Excretion by other
routes has not been reported.
5.5.   SUMMARY
    Furfural appears to be readily absorbed after oral, Inhalation or cuta-
neous exposure (Jodynls-llebert  and  Laboda, 1982;  Flek and  Sedlvec, 1978).
Metabolism appears  to  be rapid,  furoylglydne  being the major metabolite in
orally exposed  animals  (Jodynls-Uebert and  Laboda,   1982)  and  1n humans
exposed by  Inhalation  (Flek and  Sedlvec,  1978).   2-Furanacrylur1c  add Is a
secondary metabolite In humans  and furolc  acid  1s  a metabolite of animals,
0069d                               -17-                             01/06/88

-------
but  not  of  humans.   The  major  route  of  excretion  after  either  oral  or
Inhalation exposure  appears  to  be  the urine  (Jodynls-Uebert  and Laboda,
1982; Flek and Sedlvlc, 1978).  Unchanged furfural was not Identified In the
urine of humans or animals.
0069d                               -18-                            06/25/87

-------
                                  6.   EFFECTS
6.1.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
6.1.1.   Inhalation Exposures.
    6.1.1.1.   SUBCHRONIC — Feron et  al.  (1979)  exposed groups  of  10 male
and 10 female 5-week-old Syrian golden  hamsters to  atmospheres  containing 0,
20, 115  or  552  ppm  (0,  77,  448  or  2165 mg/m3),  6  hours/day,  5  days/week
for 13 weeks.   Parameters  of toxldty  evaluated  Included general condition,
body  weight,  hematology, urlnalysls,  serum chemistry,  Indicators of  liver
damage  (I.e.,  serum  alkaline  phosphatase),   gross   necropsy  examination,
relative  weights  of  major  organs  and hlstopathologlc  appearance of  major
organs and  tissues.   All  hamsters were sacrificed on  the day  after  the last
exposure.   At  552 ppm,  hamsters  showed signs  of Irritation  throughout  the
experimental  period.    Transient   restlessness  for  the  first   2 weeks  was
observed In the 115 ppm group.  A slight  reduction  In growth,  which was.more
apparent In  the males,  was  observed In hamsters  at 552 ppm (p<0.05).   There
were  no  effects  on hematology or  urlnalysls.   SGPT appeared  to  be  elevated
In  males  at  552  ppm  (p<0.05).   Although  several   relative  organ  weights
differed  significantly  from  controls,  these  occurrences  appeared  to  be
random, with  the  exception of  elevated relative  liver weights  In males at
552 ppm,  which  was possibly  attributed to treatment  with  furfural.   Hlsto-
pathologlc lesions were  limited to  the  nasal cavity and consisted of disrup-
tions  and atrophy  of  the olfactory epithelium  In the  absence  of rhinitis or
signs  of Irritation of  the  respiratory  epithelium.  This lesion was  noted at
115 and   552 ppm,  with  both  the Incidence  and  Intensity of  the  lesion
occurring  In a  concentration-related  manner.   Thus,  exposure  to  20  ppm
appears to represent a NOAEL for this  study.
0069d                               -19-                             06/25/87

-------
    AIHA  (1965)  reported the  results  of an  unpublished study  In  dogs.   No
effects  were  reported  In dogs exposed to  63  ppm (248  mg/m3),  6 hours/day,
5  days/week  for   4  weeks;   however,  fatty degeneration  of  the  liver  was
reported  at 130  ppm (511  mg/m3).   In another  study,  rats  exposed  to  200
mg/m3,  5  hours/day,  6  days/week  for  12  weeks  had  disruption  of  the
hypothalamlc-hypophyseal-adrenal  system resulting  1n altered  neurochemlcal
parameters  (Brzezlnskl  et al.,  1978).   Altered alkaline phosphatase activity
and disturbed  calcium and  phosphorus  metabolism  were also reported  1n rats
exposed 5  hours/day,  6  days/week for  3 months  (Oledzka  and S1korsk1, 1981);
abstracts  of  this  study reported different  concentrations  1n  air,  10 and 20
mg/m3.   Pecora  et  al.  (1961)  reported  that  exposure  to  60  ppm  (236
mg/m3),  4  hours/day  for  80   days  caused no  toxic  effects  1n  rabbits.
Concentrations of  140-160  ppm  (550-630 mg/m3) were  associated  with  Irrita-
tion of  the eyes  and respiratory tract and death  In  16-20  days.  Concentra-
tions of 240-280 ppm (943-1100 mg/m3) resulted 1n death 1n 8-10 days.
    6.1.1.2.   CHRONIC — Conflicting  reports  exist  regarding  the  toxldty
of  occupational  exposure   to  furfural.   Bugyl  and  Lepold  (1949)  reported
numbness  of the  tongue and  oral mucosa,  loss of  the  sense  of  taste  and
breathing  difficulty  In workers at  a  furfural plant, which  lacked adequate
ventilation.  Korenman and  Resnlk  (1930) associated headache,  Itching of  the
throat and eye Irritation  with concentrations of  1.9-14 ppm  (7-53  mg/m9).
Usmanov  and  Akhmedkhodzhaeva  (1961)   diagnosed  hepatitis  and  functional
disorders  of   the nervous   system  In workers  exposed  to  0.03-0.13  mg/i
(30-130 mg/m>).   Pawlowlcz   et  al.  (1984)  studied the  effects  of  furfural
exposure on the  respiratory tract of  exposed  workers  1n a  butadiene plant.
Furfural  concentration  did   not exceed 7.3 mg/m3.   Results  of  a  question-
naire  Indicated that  12/51  (23%)  of  those  exposed had  chronic  bronchitis.


0069d                               -20-                             01/06/88

-------
SplrometMc  testing,  however, did  not confirm  the presence  of  bronchitis.
In a more  recent  review,  Dunlop and Peters  (1953)  stated  that an occasional
skin allergy  1s  the  only  adverse reaction to  long-term  exposure  to furfural
when ventilation Is adequate.
    One  chronic  animal   Inhalation  experiment  with  furfural  was  located.
Feron and  Kruysse  (1978)  exposed groups of  18 male and  18 female 6-week-old
Syrian  golden hamsters to  furfural vapor  7 hours/day,  5 days/week  for  52
weeks  followed  by  a  29-week  observation period.   A similar  group  of  air.
exposed controls  was  maintained.  Exposure  was  to  400 ppm  (1550 mg/m3)  for
9 weeks,  330 ppm  (1280  mg/m3)  during  weeks 10-20  and  250 ppm  (970  mg/ma)
during  weeks 21-52,   resulting  In  a   TUA  concentration  of  293 ppm  (1151
mg/m3).  Concentrations were reduced during the exposure period  because  of
marked  reduction  of  growth  and to avoid early mortality.  At  the end  of the
exposure period,  three males and three females  from each group  were  sacri-
ficed  for  hematology,  limited  clinical chemistry,  gross necropsy  examina-
tion,   organ  weight   determinations   and   hlstopathology.   Survivors  were
sacrificed at 81 weeks and examined similarly.
    Exposed  hamsters  showed  signs  of   Irritation and developed  a yellowish
brown discoloration  of the  hair coat.  Exposed  hamsters  of  both  sexes  had
significantly reduced body weights during the  exposure period, but there was
a tendency  to regain weight  similar to controls after  the  exposure period.
Exposure to furfural  had  no  effects  on clinical  chemistry,  hematology  or
relative organ weights.  Pathologic  lesions,  restricted  to the nasal epithe-
lium, consisted of degeneration  and atrophy of  the  olfactory  epithelium and
disruption of the Bowman's glands.  A  comparison of the  nasal lesions  at the
end of  the  29-week recovery  period  with those observed Immediately at  termi-
nation  of  exposure gave  no  Indication   that  the  lesions  had  either regressed
or progressed during the recovery period.

0069d                               -21-                             06/25/87

-------
6.1.2.   Oral Exposures.
    6.1.2.1.   SUBCHRONIC — SRI  (1981a)  treated  groups  of  10  male  and  10
female 46-day-old  Flscher-344  rats by gavage with  furfural  In corn oil at 0
(vehicle control),  11, 22, 45,  90 or 180  mg/kg,  5 days/week for  13 weeks.
Terminal sacrifice  was begun  the  day after the last  treatment.   Parameters
of  toxldty  evaluated Included  clinical   observation,  body  weights,  gross
necropsy examination  of all  rats, relative organ  weights  of  several  major
organs  of  all  groups  and  complete  hlstopathology of  controls,  90  and  180
mg/kg rats.   In addition,  lungs  and  livers  from all 11, 22 and 45 mg/kg rats
were  examined histopathologlcally.  All  the females and  nine males  at  180
mg/kg and  one male and  four  females at 90 mg/kg  died.  All  but  one of  the
deaths at  90 mg/kg were  attributed  to  gavage error.  The  most  significant
treatment-related clinical  sign  was  red fluid  from the  nose and mouth, which
occurred In  males  at  >90  mg/kg  and  1n females  at 180 mg/kg.  At  necropsy,
gross alterations attributed to  treatment were  restricted  to enlarged livers
1n  four  males at  180  mg/kg.   A  slightly Increased relative  liver  weight  1n
male  rats  at 90 mg/kg  may  also  have been  associated with  treatment.  Liver
weights were  not elevated  In  a  dose-related manner and statistical analysis
was  not  performed.   Biologically significant  hlstopathologlc lesions  were
restricted  to the  lungs and  liver.   Perlvascular   and  perlbronchlolar  edema
was seen 1n  an apparently  randomly distributed  number  of  control  and treated
rats  of  both sexes and was attributed to  the  lung perfuslon technique used
1n  tissue  preparation  1n   this  study.  Liver  lesions,  restricted  to  male
rats, consisted  of minimal to  moderate  cytoplasmlc vacuollzatlon confined
largely to  the  centrllobular  regions.  This lesion was observed  1n controls
and  In  all  treated groups.   The  Incidence was  clearly  not  dose-related,
0069d                               -22-                             01/06/88

-------
but was  present  In only three controls and  1n  at least seven males  1n  each
of  the treated  groups,  except  In males  at 180 mg/kg  that probably  died
before the lesion had time to develop.
    SRI (1981b) also  treated  groups  of 10 male and  10  female 53-  to  57-day-
old B6C3F1 mice with  furfural  In corn  oil  by gavage  at  0 (vehicle  controls),
75, 150,  300,  600 or  1200  mg/kg,  5 days/week  for  13 weeks.  Parameters  of
toxldty evaluated were  as  described  for  the 13-week SRI  (1981a)  rat  study
described  above  except  that   comprehensive  hlstopathologlc  examination  was
performed on all Interim death mice, controls,  and those 1n the  300,  600 and
1200 mg/kg groups.   In  addition,  lungs and  livers from  all  75 and 150  mg/kg
mice were  examined h1stopatho1og1cally.   All mice  1n  the  1200 mg/kg  group
and nine males and nine  females  In  the 600 mg/kg  group  died; the deaths  were
attributed to  treatment.   Deaths of one  female at 150 mg/kg and  one female
In  the  control  group  were  attributed  to  gavage  error.   Clinical  signs
associated with  furfural toxldty were  confined  to  mice  at >600  mg/kg and
Included Inactivity,  ruffled  fur,  labored breathing, recumbency and  opacity
of  the  eyes  In both  sexes  and posterior  paralysis  In  females.  Body weight
gain was  depressed  In males  -53% and  In  females  -13% at  600  mg/kg.   No
adverse effects  on body weight were noted at <300 mg/kg.   The  only  toxlco-
loglcally  significant gross  necropsy   lesion was "prominent lobular  liver
architecture"  In  1200 and 600 mg/kg males and  600  mg/kg  females.  Relative
liver weights  were elevated  -16X In males and  ~27%  1n  females at  300 mg/kg,
-•7% 1n  females at 150 mg/kg  and ~12%  In  females at 75 mg/kg.  The  toxlco-
loglc significance of the elevated relative  liver weight 1n 75 mg/kg females
1s  not   clear.    Biologically  significant  hlstopathologlc   lesions   were
restricted to  the  liver.  Liver lesions,  which consisted  of  various stages
of  degeneration,  coagulatlve  necrosis  and  subchronlc  Inflammation, appeared


0069d                     v          -23-                             01/06/88

-------
to  be more  severe  In males, and  occurred In  both  sexes  In  a  dose-related
manner  at  >150 mg/kg.   Lesions at  150  mg/kg were  described  as minimal  to
moderate.  Lesions  1n the lungs,  which  consisted of peMvascular  and  peM-
bronchlolar  edema  occurred  1n control and  treated mice and were  attributed
to the lung perfuslon technique used 1n tissue preparation.
    6.1.2.2.    CHRONIC — Pertinent  data  regarding  the  toxldty of  chronic
oral  exposure  to  furfural could not  be  located  1n  the  available  literature
as dted 1n Appendix A.
6.1.3.   Other  Relevant   Information.    Oral   LD5Q  values   for   furfural
Include 50-100 mg/kg  (Brabec, 1981), 65 mg/kg  (NIOSH,  1987), 127 mg/kg  (Sax,
1984) and  135  mg/kg (AIHA,  1965) for rats, 400  mg/kg  for  mice {NIOSH,  1987;
Sax,  1984),  541 mg/kg for guinea pigs, and 2300 mg/kg  for dogs  (Sax, 1984).
Single large  oral  doses are  associated  primarily with CNS effects  (Brabec,
1981; AIHA, 1965).
    Furfural   vapors  are Irritating  to  skin,  eyes and  mucous  membranes  and
the liquid Is  dangerous to the  eyes  (Sax.  1984;  AIHA,  1965; Wlndholz, 1983).
Thresholds for odor  detection of the vapor have  been  reported as  0.024-20.0
mg/m3  (0.006-5  ppm)  (Ruth,  1986)  and  0.078  ppm  (Amoore   and   Hautala,
1983).  The  odor  1s  reported to be similar  to almonds.  The  threshold  for
Irritation  Is  listed  as   48   mg/ma.   Furfural  1s   also said   to  be  a
photosensltlzer (Hamilton and Hardy, 1974).
    Nakahara  and Mori  (1942)  described a series  of experiments In which rats
were  fed diets containing furfural  to produce liver cirrhosis.  Diets  con-
sisted of  polished  or unpolished  rice with  or without fish meal and carrot
supplement.  The period of  feeding ranged from 38-548 days.    The  Investi-
gators  noted  that   furfural volatility  precluded  accurate  estimation  of
animal dosages.  Nominal  dietary  concentrations  ranged from  1-5%  furfural.
Mortality  was  generally high.   Liver  cirrhosis was consistently produced.

0069d                               -24-                              01/06/88

-------
These data confirm the liver as  the  target organ  of  furfural  toxldty  1n  the
rat, but are not useful for quantitative risk  assessment.
6.2.   CARCINOGENICITY
6.2.1.   Inhalation.    The  only  data   regarding  the   cardnogenldty  of
furfural by  Inhalation exposure are  from the 81-week  study  1n hamsters by
Feron and  Kruysse (1978)  described  1n  detail In Section  6.1.1.2.  In  this
study, groups of  18 males  and 18 females  were  exposed  to a  TWA  concentration
of  0 or   293  ppm  (1151  mg/m3),  7  hours/day,   5  days/week  for  52   weeks
followed by  an  observation period of 29 weeks for  all  but three males  and
three females  from  each  group, which  were  sacrificed at  the  end  of  the
exposure  period.   There  was  no  Indication   of  a  carcinogenic  effect of
furfural 1n this study.
6.2.2.   Oral.   Pertinent  data  regarding the cardnogenldty  of  furfural
associated with oral  exposure could  not be located  1n  the  available litera-
ture as cited 1n  Appendix  A.  The  NTP  (1987)   sponsored a gavage  study  using
rats and mice,  but hlstopathology 1s currently  In progress and  the results
are not  yet available.
6.2.3.   Other   Relevant   Information.    Sh1m1zu   (1986)    Investigated   the
ability  of furfural-Induced hepatic  cirrhosis  to  potentiate the  carcinogenic
effects  of orally administered  FAA  1n  rats.   Groups of 16 male Wlstar  rats
treated  with  furfural In  the diet  for   120 days  to produce  liver  cirrhosis
were then  treated with 0  or 0.03X  FAA   1n the diet  for 3 weeks  followed by
control  diet  for   1  week.   Another  group  was  treated  with  FAA without  the
furfural pretreatment.   Hyperplastlc  nodules  of  the liver, considered  to be
preneoplastlc changes,  did not   occur  In rats treated  with furfural  alone,
occurred  1n  2/16   rats  treated  with  FAA alone  and occurred  1n 16/16  rats
treated  with  furfural  followed by  FAA.  The  Investigators  concluded  that
liver cirrhosis  enhances the carcinogenic effect  of FAA.

0069d                               -25-                             01/06/88

-------
    Feron  (1972)  Investigated the effect of coadmlnlstratlon  of  furfural  on
the  Incidence  of  BAP-lnduced  respiratory  tract  tumors  In  Syrian  golden
hamsters.   Groups  of   35  males  and  35  females  were  given  Intratrachael
Instillations  of  0.2  ma  of  1.5X furfural, 0.2  ml  of  0.5X  BAP  or 0.2  ml
of  the  combination In  0.9% saline once  weekly  for 36 weeks.  A group  of  35
males treated  similarly with  0.9X saline for 36 weeks  served  as  the control
group.   Three males and   three  females  from  each  treated  group and  three
control males  were  sacrificed at  30 weeks  for  Interim  necropsy  Information;
the survivors  were  sacrificed at  78 weeks.  Treatment with  saline (control)
or  furfural  alone  Induced  no respiratory  tract  tumors.   BAP alone  Induced
respiratory  tract  tumors  1n  19  male  and  22  female hamsters  and BAP  and
furfural  Induced   respiratory tract  tumors  In  15   males  and  15  females.
Although  the  Incidence  of  respiratory  tract  tumors  In BAP and  furfural
treated hamsters  was  no higher  than 1n  the BAP-treated group,  H  appeared
that furfural may have reduced the  latency  period  of BAP-lnduced  respiratory
tract tumors.   The Investigator  also  noted the development of  perltracheal
tumors  1n  2  females 1n the BAP alone group and In 9  males and 11  females  In
the BAP and -furfural  group.   Feron  (1972) concluded  that  furfural had  no
carcinogenic activity of Us own,  but was cocardnogenlc with BAP.
    In  a  subsequent experiment,  Feron  and  Kruysse (1978) exposed  groups  of
18 male and  18 female Syrian golden  hamsters  to a TWA concentration of  293
ppm  (1151  mg/m3)   furfural  7  hours/day,  5 days/week  for 52  weeks  followed
by a  29-week observation  period  (see  Section  6.1.1.2.).   Similar  groups  of
hamsters were  exposed  to  a TWA  concentration  of  293 ppm furfural  7  hours/
day, 5  days/week  and  simultaneously given  52 weekly  Intratracheal  Instilla-
tions of  0.2 ml  of saline or saline containing  BAP at  0.175 or  0.35X,  or
52 weekly  subcutaneous  Injections of 0.2  ml of saline or  saline  containing
DEN at  0.0625X,  to evaluate  the  cocarclnogenlcUy   of  furfural  with  these

0069d                               -26-                             01/06/88

-------
known  respiratory  tract  carcinogens.   The  Incidence of  respiratory tract
tumors was  not greater  In furfural/BAP- or  furfural/DEN- treated hamsters
than  1n  those treated with  BAP or  DEN  alone.   The  Investigators concluded
that  Inhalation exposure to furfural had no cocardnogenlc activity with BAP
or OEN.
6.3.   MUTAGENICITY
    The  genotoxldty  of  furfural   has  been  tested  1n  several  systems  as
summarized In Table 6-1.   Results  1n reverse mutation tests with  Salmonella
typhlmuMum were generally negative (Sasaki  and  Endo, 1978;  Soska  et al.,
1981;  Marnett  et   al.,   1985)   or   equivocal   (Mortelmans  et  al.,   1986).
Positive results were reported only  In strain TA100 and were generally weak,
the number of reverted colonies on  treated plates exceeded control plates by
a factor of ~2  (Zdzlenlcka et al.,  1978; Loquet et  al., 1981).  Furfural was
negative 1n the DNA repair test 1n  Escher1ch1a  coll.  the  prophage Induction
test  1n  lysogenlc   E..  coll  and the  chloroplast  bleaching test  1n   Euglena
graclHs  (Soska  et al.,  1981).  Woodruff  et  al.  (1985)  reported positive
results  1n  the sex-linked recessive lethal  test  1n  DrosophUa melanogaster
1n an adult Injection but  not 1n an adult feeding protocol; negative  results
were reported 1n the reciprocal  translocatlon  test 1n  0. melanoqaster.
    Few  data  were  located  regarding  the  mutagenldty  of  furfural  In
mammalian test  systems.   Positive  results were reported for the  chromosomal
aberration test In CHO  cells  In culture (Stlch et al., 1981).  A relatively
high  proportion of  chromatld  breaks  and  exchanges   were  observed  1n  the
absence of metabolic activation.  Adding  Swiss  rat  S-9 appeared  to strongly
Increase the  magnitude  of the  response.  A concentration-dependent Increase
1n the Incidence of sister chromatld exchanges was  observed In  cell cultures
of exposed  lymphocytes  from  healthy human subjects  (Gomez-Arroyo  and  Souza,


0069d                               -27-                            01/06/88

-------
                                                                              TABLE 6-1



                                                                  Genotoxlclty Testing of Furfural
§
a.


i
to
CD
t




o
9>
rj
Assay
Reverse
Mutation
Reverse
Mutation
Reverse
Mutation
Reverse
•utatlon
Reverse
Mutation
Reverse
Mutation
DMA repair
test
Prophage
Inductest
Chloroplast
bleaching test
Sex-linked
recessive
lethal
Reciprocal
translocatlon
test

Indicator
Organ ls«
S. tvphlMuMuM
TA98. TA100
S. typhlMurluM
TA98. TA100.
TA1535
S. typhlMurluM
TA98. TA100
S. typhlMurluM
TA100. TA98.
TA1535. TA1537
S. typhlMurluM
TA100
S. typhlwrtuM
TA104
i- coM.
several strains
E. coll. lysogens
GV5027R. 4015
£. qracllls
strain Z
0. Melanogaster
P.. Melanoqaster

Purity
purified
NR
NR
97. ex
purity
checked
highest
purity
available
purity
checked
purity
checked
purity
checked
97. ex
97. ex

Application
plate
Incorporation
plate
Incorporation
plate
Incorporation
plate
Incorporation
plate
Incorporation
plate
Incorporation
spot test
spot test
NR
adult feeding or
adult Injection
adult Injection

Concentration
or Dose
0-15 nt/plate
0.05-60 M«ole/
plate
NR
0-6666 tig/plate
NR
<1 t*o1/p1ate
10 ng/dlsk
several concen-
trations NR
<300 tig/Mt
(toxic)
25.000 or 25.500
PPM. respectively
25.500 PDM

Activating
SysteM
»S-9
±S-9
»S-9
»S-9
none
none
none
none
none
NA
NA

Response Coonent
» Positive only In TA100;
» toxic at >7 pi/plate
Weakly positive In TA100
* only
Prelncubated 15 Minutes
before plate Incorporation
Prelncubated 20 Minutes;
results from 2nd of two
testing laboratories
equivocal
Tested at lower than cell-
kllllng concentrations
TA104 More sensitive to
carbonyl conpound-lnduced
•utagenlclty than TA100
NC
NC
NC
» Positive response In
Injection experiment
NC

Reference
Zdztenlcka
et al.. 1978
Loquet
et al.. 1981
Sasaki and
Endo. 1978
NorteUuns
et al.. 1986
Soska
et al.. 1981
Narnett
et al.. 1985
Soska
et al.. 1981
Soska
et al.. 1981
Soska
et al.. 1981
Woodruff
et al.. 1985
Woodruff
et al.. 1985


-------
                                                                            TABLE 6-1 (cont.)
Assay
Chroaosoaal
aberration
test
Sister
chroaattd
exchange
Indicator
Organ Isa
CHO cells
hunan
lymphocytes
Purity Application Concentration
or Dose
MR cell culture 0-40 aN
NR cell culture 0.035. 0.07 or
0.14 aN
Activating Response
Systea
»S-9 »
»
none *
Coatent
More strongly » with S-9
Concentration -dependent
response at two higher
concentrations
Reference
Stlch
et al.. 1981
Goaex -Arroyo
and Souza.
1985
       NR « Not reported; NC - no coawnt; NA - not applicable
CO
CO

-------
1985).   Metabolic activation  was not  used  1n  this  system.   An  Increased
Incidence of sister chromatld  exchanges was  not  observed In lymphocytes from
occupationally exposed workers compared with unexposed workers.
6.4.   TERATOGENICITY
    Pertinent  data  regarding  the  developmental  toxldty  of  furfural  could
not be located In the available literature as cited In Appendix A.
6.5.   OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS
    Pertinent  data  regarding  other  reproductive  effects  of  furfural  could
not be located 1n the available literature as cited In Appendix A.
6.6.   SUMMARY
    Furfural  was not  carcinogenic  1n  an  81-week   Inhalation  study  where
hamsters  were  exposed  to 293  ppm  (1151  mg/m3),  7  hours/day,  5  days/week
for  52  weeks  (Feron  and Kruysse,  1978).   The  NTP   (1987)  has  sponsored  a
gavage  study   using  rats and  mice,  but  hlstopathology Is  In progress  and
results are not  yet  available.  Shlmlzu (1986) reported that  livers  of rats
made drrhotlc by dietary pretreatment  with furfural were  more  sensitive to
the  carcinogenic  effects  of  FAA,  as   evidenced   by the  occurrence  of
preneoplastlc  hyperplastlc  nodules  In  16/16  rats compared  with  2/16  rats
treated with  FAA without pretreatment  with furfural.   In  an experiment  In
which  furfural  was  coadmlnlstered  with  BAP Intratracheally to  hamsters,
furfural  was  associated  with  a reduced  period  of latency  but  not with  an
Increased  Incidence  1n  respiratory  tract  tumors  (Feron,   1972).   Furfural.
however,  did  appear  to  Increase  the Incidence  of BAP  Induced  peMtracheal
tumors  In  this study.   In  a  subsequent  experiment,  Inhalation exposure  of
hamsters  to  furfural had  no effect on  the Incidence  of  tumors Induced  by
Intratracheal  administration  of  BAP  or  subcutaneous  administration  of
diethylnltrosamlne (Feron and Kruysse,  1978).

0069d                               -30-                             01/06/88

-------
     Furfural  was  negative  (Sasaki  and   Endo,  1978;  Soska  et  al.,  1981;
 Harriett  et al.,  1985),  equivocal  (Mortelmans  et  al.,  1986)  or only weakly
 positive (Zdz1en1cka et  al., 1978; Loquet et al.,  1981) In mutation  tests  1n
 microorganisms.   Positive results  In a  sex-linked  recessive lethal  test and
 negative results  In a  reciprocal  translocatlon  test  were  reported  1n  D.
 melanoqaster  (Woodruff et  al.,  1985).   Positive results  were also  reported
 1n CHO cells  (Stlch et al., 1981) and In  human  lymphocytes  (Gomez-Arroyo and
 Souza,  1985).    Data  were  not  located  regarding  the  developmental   or
 reproductive  toxldty of  furfural.
     The  olfactory  epithelium appears  to be  the   target  organ  1n  hamsters
 exposed  to furfural by Inhalation.   Feron et  al.  (1979) observed  disruption
 and atrophy In the  olfactory epithelium  of  hamsters exposed to 115  ppm  (448
 mg/m3)  but  not  to  20  ppm  (77 mg/m3),  6  hours/day,  5  days/week  for  13
 weeks.  Similar lesions  were observed  1n hamsters  exposed  to a TWA concen-
 tration  of  293 ppm (1151  mg/m3),  7 hours/day,  5  days/week  for  52 weeks
 (Feron and Kruysse,  1978).   In  dogs, fatty  liver  degeneration was  reported
 at 130  ppm (511  mg/m3),  6 hours/day, 5 days/week  for  4 weeks  (AIHA, 1965).
 No adverse effects  were  reported at 63 ppm  (248 mg/m3).   In humans exposed
 occupationally,  1.9-14 ppm (7-53  mg/m3)  has been  associated with  headache
90 mg/kg and hepatocytlc  cytoplasmlc vacuollzatlon  was seen 1n all treated
 groups  (SRI,  1981a).   Mice  appear  to be more resistant  than rats to the
 effects  of  orally  administered  furfural.    In mice  treated  by  the   same


 0069d                               -31-                              01/06/88

-------
schedule  as  rats  with  doses  of  75,  ISO,  300,  600 or  1200  rug/kg,  high
mortality  occurred at >600  mg/kg  (SRI, 1981b).   Degenerative,  necrotlc and
Inflammatory liver lesions were noted at >150 mg/kg but not at 75 mg/kg.
0069d                               -32-                             06/25/87

-------
                    7.  EXISTING GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS
7.1.   HUMAN
    The recommended ACGIH  (1986a)  TLV-THA for  furfural  Is 2 ppm  (-8  mg/m3)
based primarily  on  Irritation In humans  exposed  occupatlonally to  5-16  ppm
(-20-63 mg/m3)  (ACGIH,  1986b).  The  TLV corresponds  to  the maximum  allow-
able concentration  permitted  1n East  Germany and  the Soviet  Union  (ACGIH,
1986b;  Sedlvec and  Flek,  1978).  ACGIH  (1986a)  currently recommends  a  STEL
for furfural  of  10  ppm (-40  mg/m3).   The OSHA (1985) standard for  furfural
1s  currently  5  ppm  (-20  mg/m3).   Both  the  TLV-TWA  and  the  OSHA  standard
have a  "skin" notation because furfural 1s readily absorbed dermally.
    U.S.  EPA-NIH  (1987) lists  a recommended  drinking  water limit  of 98  ppm,
but the basis for this recommendation Is unclear.
7.2.   AQUATIC
    Guidelines and  standards   for  the protection  of  aquatic organisms. from
the effects of furfural could not  be  located  In  the available  literature as
cited In  Appendix A.
Q069d                               -33-                             06/25/87

-------
                              8.   RISK ASSESSMENT
8.1.   CARCINOGENICITY
8.1.1.   Inhalation.   Data  were  not  located  regarding  the  carclnogenlclty
1n  humans  of  Inhalation exposure  to  furfural.   In  the  only animal  study
available, no  carcinogenic  effects were  observed In  hamsters exposed  to  a
TWA  concentration  of   293   ppm   (1151   mg/m3}   furfural,   7  hours/day,   5
days/week for  52  weeks,  followed  by a  29-week observation  period  {Feron and
Kruysse, 1978).
8.1.2.   Oral.   The NTP  (1987)  has  sponsored a  gavage study using rats  and
mice,  but  hlstopathology  1s  In  progress  and  the  results  are  not  yet
available.
8.1.3.   Other  Routes.   Sh1m1zu (1986)  noted a marked Increase In  the Inci-
dence  of  FAA-lnduced  hyperplastlc  nodules  In rats  previously treated  with
furfural  to  Induce hepatic  cirrhosis.   Feron (1972)  observed an  Increased
Incidence of perUracheal  tumors  In hamsters treated  by  Intratracheal Infu-
sion with furfural  In  combination with BAP  compared with  those treated with
BAP  alone.   The   Investigator  concluded  that  furfural  had  cocarclnogenlc
activity with BAP.  In a  later experiment,  feron  and Kruysse (1978) observed
no evidence In hamsters  for cocardnogen1c1ty  of  Inhaled  furfural  and Intra-
tracheal Instillation of BAP or subcutaneous Injection of  DEN.
8.1.4.   Height of  Evidence.   Data  were  not  located  regarding the carclno-
genlclty  of  furfural  In  humans  and  the  data  regarding  the evidence  for
carclnogenlclty of  furfural to animals  are Inadequate. Therefore,  according
to  the  U.S.   EPA  (1986b)   guidelines  for  carcinogenic  risk  assessment,
furfural  should  be  assigned  to  EPA  Group 0,  not classifiable  as  to
carclnogenlclty In humans.
0069d                               -34-                             01/06/88

-------
8.1.5.   Quantitative  Risk  Estimates.   Data  were  Inadequate  for  estimating
the  carcinogenic  potency  of  furfural  to  humans   for  oral  or  Inhalation
exposure.
8.2.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
8.2.1.   Inhalation Exposure.
    8.2.1.1.   LESS  THAN  LIFETIME  EXPOSURES  ~ A   NOAEL   and  LOAEL  for
subchronlc  Inhalation  exposure  were  defined  In a  13-week  hamster  study
(Feron et  al.,  1979).  In this  experiment,  groups  of 10 male  and  10 female
hamsters were exposed  to  0,  20,  115 or  552  ppm (0,  77, 448 or  2165  mg/m3),
6 hours/day,  5  days/week  for  13 weeks.   The critical effect  appeared  to  be
disruption  and  atrophy of   the  olfactory epithelium,  which  occurred   In  a
concentration related manner with respect  to  Incidence and  Intensity  at >115
ppm.  No  adverse effects  were reported  at 20 ppm.   In an  unpublished  study
In  dogs   reported  by  AIHA   (1965),  no effects  were  noted  at  63  ppm. (248
mg/m3), 6  hours/day,  5 days/week for  4  weeks,  but  fatty  liver degeneration
was  noted  at 130  ppm  (511  mg/m3).   Abstracts  of   a  3-month  rats study  by
Oledzka and  S1korsk1   (1981) reported  altered alkaline phosphatase activity
and  disturbed  calcium and phosphorus  metabolism associated with  Inhalation
exposure to  furfural.   One  abstract reported the concentration as 10  mg/m3
and  the  other as  20  mg/m3,  5  hours/day,  6 days/week.   Because  data  were
not  available  for  evaluation of  this  study  and because Feron  et  al. (1979)
did  not  report  altered serum  alkaline phosphatase   1n hamsters  exposed  to a
much  higher  concentration,  2165  mg/m3,  the  Oledzka and  S1korsk1  (1981)
data  are  not considered  In  quantitative  risk  assessment.   The NOAEL  of  20
ppm  (77  mg/m3)  1s the  most  appropriate basis  for an  RfD  for  subchronlc
Inhalation  exposure  to  furfural.   Expanded  to  continuous  exposure,  the
concentration  of  77  mg/m3  corresponds   to   13.8 mg/m3.    From body  weight


0069d                               -35-                              01/06/88

-------
data provided by  the  Investigators  an  average  body weight of 0.105 kg can be
estimated.  From  a  formula  provided  by U.S.  EPA (1985)  an Inhalation rate of
0.099  mVday  1s  calculated and  an  equivalent dosage  of 13.0 mg/kg/day  Is
estimated.   Applying  an  uncertainty  factor  of  100,   10   for  Interspedes
extrapolation and 10  for   Intraspedes  variability,  results  In  an RfO  for
subchronlc Inhalation exposure  to furfural of  0.1  mg/kg/day, or  9 mg/day for
a  70  kg  human.   Confidence  1n  this  RfD  1s   low as  explained   1n  Section
8.2.1.2.
    8.2.1.2.    CHRONIC  EXPOSURES — Occupational   studies  report  Irritation
at  exposures  as  low  as  1.9 ppm (7 mg/m3)  (Korenman  and Resnlk,  1930)  and
hepatitis  and  CNS  effects  at  30  mg/m3  (Usmanov  and  Akhmedkhodzhaeva,
1961).  Adequate  data  from  these studies were  not  available for  evaluation.
Dunlop and Peters  (1953)  stated that an occasional  skin  allergy  Is the  only
adverse  reaction   to   long-term exposure  to  furfural  when ventilation  1s
adequate.  ACGIH   (1986a)   recommended  a  TUA-TLV   of  2  ppm  (-8  mg/m3)  to
protect against  Irritation 1n  the  workplace.   In  the  only chronic  animal
study, Feron  and  Kruysse  (1978)  exposed  hamsters  to furfural at  a TWA  con-
centration of  293 ppm  (1151  mg/m3), 7  hours/day,  5 days/week for  52 weeks
followed  by  a 29-week  observation  period.  Degradation  and atrophy of  the
olfactory epithelium  occurred  and  this  study   failed  to  define a  NOAEL  for
chronic Inhalation exposure.
    An RfD of 6 mg/day for chronic  Inhalation  exposure to  furfural could  be
derived by expanding  the  TUA-TLV of 2 ppm (8  mg/m3) to  continuous exposure
and by applying an  uncertainty  factor  of 10 to unusually sensitive Individ-
uals.  Since  the  TUA-TLV  Is Intended  to protect  against Irritation but  not
necessarily against  toxldty,   the  TUA-TLV  1s  rejected as  a basis for  the
RfD.  A more  sound  approach 1s  to apply an  additional  uncertainty factor  of
10  to  the subchronlc  NOAEL to  expand  from subchronlc  to chronic  exposure.

0069d                               -36-                             01/06/88

-------
Application of an  additional  factor  of 10 to the NOAEL of  13.0 mg/kg/day  In
the  subchronlc  study by Feron et  al.  (1979) results  In  an RfD for  chronic
Inhalation exposure  to  furfural  of 0.01  mg/kg/day or 0.9 mg/day for  a  70  kg
human.   Because the cardnogenlclty,   chronic  toxldty,  developmental and
reproductive  toxldty   of  furfural  have  not been  Investigated adequately,
only low confidence can be placed 1n this  value.
8.2.2.   Oral Exposure.
    8.2.2.1.   LESS  THAN  LIFETIME  EXPOSURES  (SUBCHRONIC)  — Oral  exposure
studies are  restricted to 13-week  gavage experiments,  which  Indicated  that
the  liver Is the target  organ of  furfural  1n rats  and mice.  In groups  of  10
male  and   10  female  rats treated with  11, 22,  45,  90  or  180  mg/kg,   5
days/week,  mortality   was  associated   with   >90  mg/kg  and  hepatocytlc
cytoplasmlc vacuollzatlon was seen  In  all treated groups (SRI, 1981a).  The
lesions were  described as mild  to moderate, and  the low  dose  level of  11
mg/kg may  be  considered a LOAEL  1n  rats.   Mice appear to  be  more  resistant
than rats  to  the effects  of  orally  administered  furfural.   In mice  treated
by  the  same schedule  as  rats but with doses  of  75,  150,  300,  600  or  1200
mg/kg,  high  mortality  occurred  at >600  mg/kg  (SRI, 1981b).   Degenerative,
necrotlc and Inflammatory  liver  lesions were noted at >150 mg/kg  but not  at
75 mg/kg.   Lacking a suitable NOAEL,  the LOAEL of 11 mg/kg,  5 days/week  In
rats may  serve  as  the  basis for  an  RfO  for  subchronlc  oral  exposure  to
furfural  (SRI,   1981a).   Multiplication  by  5  days/7  days  results  In  an
expanded dosage  of 7.9 mg/kg/day.  Application of  an uncertainty  factor  of
1000, 10  to estimate a  NOAEL from a LOAEL, 10  to extrapolate from  rats  to
humans, and 10  to  protect unusually sensitive Individuals  results  In an RfD
for  subchronlc exposure  to furfural  of 0.008 mg/kg/day,  or 0.6 mg/day  for  a
70  kg   human.   Confidence 1n  this RfD  1s  low  because  the  key  study, the


0069d                               -37-                             01/06/88

-------
13-week gavage study (SRI, 1981a) did not  Identify  a  NOAEL  for  liver  effects
In  rats,  the  more  sensitive  of   the  species   tested,   and   because   the
carclnogenldty,  developmental  and   reproductive  toxldty  of  furfural  have
not been Investigated adequately.
    8.2.2.2.   CHRONIC EXPOSURES —  Data were  not  located  regarding  chronic
oral exposure to  furfural.   In the  absence of suitable chronic  data,  an  RfD
for chronic  oral  exposure to  furfural  may be estimated from the  subchronlc
oral RfD  by application  of  an additional  uncertainty  factor  of  10   to  the
LOAEL  of  7.9   mg/kg/day.    An  RfO  of   0.8  pg/kg/day  or  0.06  mg/day   for
chronic oral exposure  to  furfural Is calculated.   Confidence 1n  this  RfD  Is
low as explained  1n  Section  8.2.2.1. and because chronic oral exposure  data
are lacking.
0069d                               -38-                             01/06/88

-------
                           9.   REPORTABLE QUANTITIES
9.1.   BASED ON SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
    Information regarding  the  systemic  toxlclty of furfural was  reviewed  1n
Chapter  6.   Data  potentially  useful  for  deriving  CSs  based  on  systemic
toxldty  are available  from  subchronlc  Inhalation,   occupational  and  oral
studies and are summarized  In  Table 9-1.  Effects  associated with Inhalation
exposure  to  furfural   Include  nonreverslble  disruption  of  the  olfactory
epithelium  In  hamsters  (Feron  et  al.,  1979;  Feron  and Kruysse, 1978), and
headache  and  Irritation of  the eyes  and  throat  In   occupatlonally  exposed
humans (Korenman and Resnlk, 1930).  Oral exposure to  furfural  Is associated
with mortality and liver lesions In rats  and  mice (SRI, 1981a,b).
    CSs for  these  effects  are  calculated and  presented In Table 9-2.   A  CS
for  lesions  of the  olfactory  epithelium  1s calculated  only  from  the  sub-
chronic data of  Feron  et  al.  (1979) because the effect was observed  Iri the
subchronlc study at  a  level  lower  than that of  the chronic  study.   Although
the  occupational  study  by  Korenman  and  Resnlk  (1930)  1s  not  adequately
reported  to  be considered  In  quantitative   risk  assessment,  a CS  1s  calcu-
lated  from  these  data  for comparison.   CSs  for mortality and  liver effects
were calculated only from the  rat  data  (SRI,  1981a)   because  rats  were  more
sensitive than mice to these effects.
    CSs  range  from  6.0 for  headache  and   Irritation  1n humans  to 27  for
mortality  In rats.   The  CSs   Indicate  that  orally  exposed  rats   are  more
sensitive than occupatlonally  exposed  humans or hamsters exposed by Inhala-
tion.  Although human data are  available, the  CS of  27 associated with an  RQ
of 100 1s chosen to  represent  the  systemic toxldty of furfural (Table 9-3).
0069d                               -39-                             06/25/87

-------
                                                                          TABLE 9-1
                                                                Toxtclty Summary for Furfural
o.



1
o
1




Q
0»
IS)
Route
Inhalation
Inhalation
Inhalation
Oral
Oral
Oral
Oral
'Calculated
weight of
"Calculated
'Calculated
^Reference
•Reference
Species/
Strain
hamster/
Syr Ian
golden
hamster/
Syr Ian
golden
human/
NA
rat/F344
rat/F344
mouse/
B6C3F1
mouse/
B6C3F1
Sex/
Number
N/10.
F/10
N/18,
F/18
NR/NR
N/10.
F/10
N/10.
F/10
N/10.
F/10
N/10,
F/10
by mutlttplylng the
70 kg.
Average
Body
Height
0.105°
0.099°
70<
0.350*
0.350*
0.03f
0.03f
animal dose
as the mean body weight for males
Purity/
Vehicle
purity
checked
purity
checked
MR
99.6V
corn oil
99.6V
corn oil
99.6V
corn oil
99.6V
corn oil
expressed as
and females
Exposure
115 ppm (448 mg/m»)
6 hours/day, 5 days/
week or 13 weeks
TUA concentration of
293 ppm (1151 mg/m»)
7 hours/day, 5 days/
week or 52 weeks
1.9-14 ppm (7-53
mg/m*) occupational
90 mg/kg. 5 days/week
for 13 weeks
11 mg/kg. 5 days/week
for 13 weeks
600 mg/kg, 5 days/
week for 13 weeks
150 mg/kg. 5 days/
week for 13 weeks
Transformed
Animal Dose
(mg/kg/day)
75. Oc
226. 3C
NA
64.3
7.9
429
107
Equivalent
Human Dosea
(mg/kg/day)
8.59
25.4
0.11 at
1.9 ppm
11.0
1.4
32.3
8.07
mg/kg/day by the cube root of the ratio of the animal
from data provided by the
by expanding to continuous exposure and applying the formula 0.7488xbw°-
human body weight (U.S
rat body weight
(U.S.
. EPA. 1980)
EPA. 1980)




Investigators.
* (U.S. EPA. 1985)



Response Reference
Mild disruption and Feron et al..
atrophy of olfactory 1979
epithelium
Decreased body Feron and
weight, destruction Kruysse. 1978
of olfactory epi-
thelium
Headache. Irritation Korenman and
of eyes and throat Resnlk. 1930
Mortality SRI. 1981a
Minimum to moderate SRI. 1981a
hepatocellular cyto-
plasmlc vacuollzatton
In males
Mortality SRI. 19815
Degeneration, focal SRI. 19815
necrosis and Inflam-
mation of the liver
body weight to the reference human body

to estimate Inhalation rate.




'Reference mouse body weight (U.S.  EPA. 1980)
NR = Not reported; NA = not applicable

-------
o
o»
tO
                                                                          TABLE 9-2


                                                                Co*posHe Scores for Furfural
Route
Inhalation
Inhalation
Oral
Oral
Spec les
hamster
human
rat
rat
Animal Dose
(mg/kg/day)
75.0
NA
64.3
7.9
Chronic
Human NED9
(•g/day)
60.1«>
50
77»
9.8»»
RVd
2.8
3.0
2.7
4.0
Effect RVe
Disruption and atrophy 6
of olfactory epithelium
Headache and Irritation 2
of eyes and throat
Mortality 10
Moderate hepatocellular 5
vacuollzatlon
CS
16.8
6.0
27
20
RQ
1000
1000
100
1000
Reference
Feron et al..
1979
Korenman and
Resnlk. 1930
SRI. 1981 a
SRI. 1981a
       'Calculated  by  Multiplying the equivalent hiwan dose  expressed  In term of mg/kg/day by 70 kg  to express the Chronic Human  NED In terms of
        •g/day for a 70 kg human.


       DAn uncertainty factor of 10 was applied to expand  from subchrontc  to chronic exposure.
 en

 oo

-------
                                   TABLE  9-3
                                   FURFURAL
           Minimum Effective  Dose  (MEO) and Reportable  Quantity  (RQ)


Route:                  oral
Dose*:                  77 mg/day
Effect:                 mortality
Reference:              SRI,  1981a
RVd:                    2.7
RVe                     10
Composite Score:        27
RQ:                     100
*Equ1valent human dose
0069d                               -42-                             01/06/88

-------
Selection of the CS based on the oral rat data represents the more conserva-
tive approach and gives  preference  to data  from  a study In which dosage was
carefully  controlled.    Furthermore,  data  regarding  the  toxldty of  oral
exposure of  humans  to  furfural  are  limited, and  occupational  exposures are
difficult to quantify.
9.2.   BASED ON CARCINOGENICITY
    The  only  data regarding  the  cardnogenldty of  furfural  by  Inhalation
exposure are from  an  81-week  hamster   study  by Feron  and  Kruysse  (1978)
described In detail  In  Section  6.1.1.2.  In this study,  groups  of 18 males
and 18  females  were exposed  to  a TWA  concentration  of  0 or 293  ppm (0 or
1151 mg/m3), 7  hours/day, 5  days/week  for  52  weeks, followed by  a 29-week
observation  period  for  all   but  three   males  and  three  females  from  each
group,  which were  sacrificed  at  the end  of  the  exposure  period.  There was
no Indication of a carcinogenic effect of furfural 1n  this study.
    Pertinent  data  regarding  the  cardnogenlclty  of  furfural  after  oral
exposure could   not  be  located   In  the  available  literature as   cited  In
Appendix A.   The  NTP  (1987)  has  sponsored  a  gavage  study using  rats and
mice,   but   hlstopathology 1s  1n  progress  and   the  results  are not  yet
available.
    Data were not located regarding the cardnogenldty of human  exposure to
furfural and the chemical was assigned  to EPA Group D.  Data were  not suffi-
cient   for  estimation  of  a  potency  factor  for  furfural  and  hazard ranking
based  on cardnogenldty  Is not possible.
0069d                               -43-                            01/06/88

-------
                                10.   REFERENCES

ACGIH  (American  Conference of  Governmental  Industrial  Hyg1en1sts).   1986a.
TLVs: Threshold Um1t Values  for  Chemical  Substances  In  the Work Environment
Adopted  by  ACGIH  with  Intended  Changes  for  1986-1987.   Cincinnati,  OH.
p. 19.

ACGIH  (American  Conference of  Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).   1986b.
Documentation of the threshold  Limit  Values  and  Biological  Exposure Indices,
5th ed.  Cincinnati,  OH.   p. 280.

AIHA  (American  Industrial  Hygiene Association).   1965.   Furfural.   Am.  Ind.
Hyg. Assoc. Hygienic  Guide Series  p.  196-199.

Alabaster,  J.S.   1969.   Survival  of fish  In  164 herbicides,  Insecticides,
fungicides,  wetting  agents   and  miscellaneous  substances.    Int.   Pest.
Control.  11(2):  29-35.

Amoore,  J.E.  and  A.E. Hautala.   1983.   Odor  as  an  aid   to  chemical  safety:
Odor  thresholds  compared with  threshold  limit  values and  volatilities  for
214  Industrial chemicals  1n air  and  water dilution.   J. Appl.  Toxlcol.   3:
272-290.

Benjamin, N.N., S.I.  Woods and  J.F. Ferguson.  1984.   Anaerobic  toxldty  and
b1odegradab111ty of pulp  mill  waste constituents.  Water  Res.  18: 601-607.
0069d                               -44-                             01/06/88

-------
Brabec, M.J.   1981.  Aldehydes  and  acetals.   In,: Patty's Industrial Hygiene
and Toxicology, Vol. 2A,  3rd ed., G.O.  Clayton  and F.E. Clayton, Ed.  John
Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.   p.  2662-2669.

BMngmann, G.  and  R. Kuehn.   1977.   Results  of the damaging effect of water
pollutants on Daphnla magna.   Z.  Wasser  Abwasser  Forsch.  10(5): 161-166.

Brlngmann, G. and R. Kuehn.  1978.  Testing of substances for  their toxldty
threshold: Model  organisms H1crocyst1s  (01plocyst1s)  aeruglnosa  and Scene-
desmus quadMcauda. MHt.  Int.  Ver.  Theor. Angew.  Llmnol.   21: 275-284.

Brlngmann. G. and R. Kuehn.  1980.  Comparison of  the  toxldty thresholds of
water pollutants to bacteria, algae  and protozoa 1n the cell multiplication
Inhibition test.  Water Res.   14(3):  231-241.

Brlngmann, G.  and  R. Kuehn.   1982.   Results  of toxic action of water pollu-
tants on  Daphnla maqna  Straus  tested by an Improved standardized  procedure.
Z. Wasser Abwasser  Forsch.   15(1):  1-16.

Brlngmann, G.,  R.  Kuhn and  A.  Winter.  1980.   Bestlmmung  der blologlschen
schadwlrkung wasserge-fahrdender  stoffe gegen  protozoen.   III. Saprozolsche
flagellaten.    (Determination of  the...)  Z.  Wasser Abwasser Forsch.  13(5):
170-173.  (Ger.)                                                    ^
0069d                               -45-                             01/06/88

-------
Brzez1nsk1,  J.,   B.   Wysocka-Paruszewska,   I.   Gradowska-Olszewska   and  A.
Oslcka-Koprowska.   1978.   Effect  of  furfural on  neurochemlcal balance  and
body  adaptation  processes.   Part  I.  Alterations of  the level  of  catechol-
amlnes,  adrenal   cortex  hormones  and  chollnesterase  activity   following
exposure  by Inhalation.   Bromatol.  Chem.  Toksykol.   11(4):  403-408.   (CA
90:116108d)

Bugyl,  B.   and  J.  Lepold.   1949.   Nepegeazsegugy  (Hungarian).  Ind.  Hyg.
Foundation Abstr. 60.  30: 229.  (Cited In ACGIH, 1986b)

Coleman, E.G.,  C.  Ho and  S.S.  Chang.   1981.   Isolation and  Identification of
volatile compounds from baked potatoes.  J.  Agrlc.  Food Chem.   29:  42-48.

Oougan, J.,  J.M.   Robinson,   S.  Sumar,  G.E.  Howard  and  O.G. Coursey.   1983.
Some  flavoring  constituents of  cassava and  of  processed  cassava  products.
J. Sc1. Food Agrlc.  34: 874-884.

Dunlop, A.P.  and  F.N.  Peters.  1953.   The Furans:  ACS Monograph No.  119.
Relnhold Publishing Corp.   (Cited In ACGIH,  1986b;  Brabec, 1981)

Ettlnger,   M.B.,   R.J.   Llshka  and W.A.  Moore.   1954.   Determination  and
persistence of furfural  In  river  waters,   Proc.  8th  Industrial Waste  Conf.
Purdue Univ. Ext. Ser.   83:  206-214.

Feron, V.J.  1972.  Respiratory  tract  tumors  In  hamsters after Intratracheal
Instillations  of  benzo(a)pyrene  alone  and  with   furfural.    Cancer   Res.
(United States).   32(1): 28-36.

0069d                               -46-                             06/25/87

-------
Feron, V.J. and A. Kruysse.  1978.  Effects of  exposure  to furfural  vapor  In
hamsters  simultaneously  treated with  benzo(a)pyrene or  d1ethyln1trosam1ne.
Toxicology.  11(2): 127-144.

Feron,  V.J.,   A.   Kruysse  and  H.C.   Dreef-Vander  Meulen.   1979.   Repeated
exposure  to  furfural  vapor:   13-week  study  1n   Syrian  golden  hamsters.
Zentralbl. Baktevlol Pavasltenkd Infection Skv. Hyg. Abt.  1.   Or1g.  Relhe  B.
168(5-6): 442-451.

Flek, J. and V. Sedlvec.  1978.  The  absorption, metabolism and  excretion  of
furfural  1n  man.   Int.  Arch.  Occup.  Environ.  Health.   41(3):  159-168.
(Taken from HEEP/79/0025)

Gomez-Arroyo,  S. and S.V. Souza.  1985.  in vitro  and  occupational Induction
of sister-chromatld exchanges In human  lymphocytes with  furfuryl  alcohol and
furfural.  Mutat.  Res.  156(3):  233-238.

Graedel, T.E.   1978.  Chemical Compounds 1n the Atmosphere.   Academic  Press,
Inc., New York.  p. 175.

Hamilton,  A.   and  H.L.  Hardy.   1974.   Industrial  Toxicology,  3rd ed.
Publishing Science Group,  Inc.,  Acton, MA.

Hampton, C.V.,  U.R.  Plerson, T.M.  Harvey, N.S. Updegrove and  R.S.  Harano.
1982.  Hydrocarbon  gases  emitted from  vehicles  on the road.  I.  A  qualita-
tive  gas chromatography/mass  spectrometry survey.   Environ. Sc1.  Technol.
16: 287-298.

0069d                               -47-                             01/06/88

-------
Hansch,  C.  and  A.J.  Leo.  1981.   Hedchem Project.  Issue  No.  19.  Pomona
College, Claremont, CA.

Hessov,  I.B.   1975.   Toxldty of  5-hydroxymethylfurfural  and  furfural  to
Daphnla maqna.  Acta Pharmacol. Toxlcol.   37(1):  94-96.

Hlraoka,  H'.  and   R.  Sr1n1vasan.   1968.   Vapor-phase  photochemistry  of
furfural.  J.  Chem. Phys.   48(5):  2185-2189.

Ho,  C., K.N.  Lee  and Q.Z.  Jin.   1983.   Isolation and  Identification  of
Volatile Flavor Compounds  In Fried  Bacon.   J. AgMc.  Food. Chem. 31: 336-342.

Jodynls-Llebert,  J. and K.  Laboda.  1982.  Study  of furfural  metabolism In
rats.   Bromatol.  Ghem.   Toksykol.   15(1-2):  61-66.   [CA  97(23):194058w]
(Cited  In Brabec, 1981)

Johnstone,   R.A.W.  and J.R.  PUmmer.    1959.   The  chemical  constituents  of
tobacco and tobacco smoke.  Chem.  Rev.   59: 885-936.

Juhnke,  I.  and  D.  Luedemann.   1978.   Results  of  the study  of 200 chemical
compounds  on  acute fish  toxldty  using  the  Golden Orfe test.   Z.  Wasser
Abwasser Forsch.   11(5): 161-164.

Juttner, F.  1986.  Analysis of organic compounds  (VOC)  In the forest air of
southern Black Forest. Chemosphere.  15:  985-992.   (Ger).
0069d                               -48-                             01/06/88

-------
Kawasaki, M.   1980.   Experience  with  the  test  scheme under  the  chemical
control  law  of  Japan:   An  approach  to   structure-activity  correlations.
Ecotoxlc. Environ.  Safety.  4:  444-454.

Keith, L.H.   1974.   Chemical characterization  of  Industrial  wastewaters by
gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.   Scl.  Total  Environ.   3: 87-102.

K1nl1nt  T.E.,  R.  Muralldhara, A.O.  PHtet,  A. Sanderson  and  J.P.  Walradt.
1972.  Volatile components  1n  roasted filberts.  J.  Agrlc.  Food Chem.   20:
1021.

Klelndlenst, T.E.,  P.B.  Shepson,  E.O. Edney,  L.D.  CLaxton and  L.T.  CupUt.
1986.  Wood  smoke:  Measurement of  the mutagenlc activities of  Its gas  and
partlculate-phase   photooxldatlon   products.    Environ.   Sd.  Technol.  .  20:
493-501.

Konasewlch,  0., M. Traversy and H. Zar.  1978.  Status  report on  organic  and
heavy  metal  contaminants In  the  Lakes  Erie,  Michigan, Huron  and  Superior
Basins.  Great Lake Water Qual.  Board,  p. 290, 292.

(Cool, H.J., C.F. Van  Kreljl  and B.C.J. Zoeteman.  1982.   Toxicology assess-
ment  of  organic compounds  In  drinking water.  Crlt.  Rev. Environ.  Contol.
12: 307-357.

Korenman, I.M.  and  I.B.  Resnlk.  1930.  Arch.  f.  Hyg.  104:344.   (Cited  1n
ACGIH, 1986b)
0069d                               -49-                             01/06/88

-------
Lawler,  G.M.,  Ed.  1977.   Chemical  Origins and  Markets,  5th ed.   Stanford
Research Institute, MenTo Park, CA.  p. 99.

LIpaH,  P.,  J.M.  Oasch  and W.F.  Scruggs.  1984.   Aldehyde emissions  from
wood-burning fireplaces.   Environ.  Scl. Technol.   18:  326-330.

Loquet,  C.,  G.T. Toussant  and  J.Y.  Letalaer.   1981.   Studies on  mutagenlc
constituents of  apple brandy  and  various  alcoholic  beverages collected  In
Western  France,  a high Incidence  area  for oesophageal  cancer.  Hutat.  Res.
8: 155-164.

Lucas,  S.V.   1984.   GC/MS  Analysis  of  organlcs In  drinking  water  concen-
trates  and  advanced waste  treatment concentrates:  Vol.  1.  Analysis  results
for  17 drinking  water.   16  Advanced  waste  treatment  and  3  process  blank
concentrates.  Health Eff.  Res. Lab.,  Columbus Labs., Columbus, OH.   p.  321.
EPA 600/1-84-020A.  NTIS  PB85-128221.

Lyman,  W.J., W.F. Reehl   and  O.H.  Rosenblatt.   1982.   Handbook of  Chemical
Property Estimation Methods.   McGraw-Hill  Book  Co,  New York.  p. 4-9;  5-4;
5-10; 7-4;  15-16 to 15-29.

Harriett, L.J.,  H.K. Hurd, M.C. Hollsteln,  D.E. Levin, H.  Esterbauer  and  B.N.
Ames.   1985.   Naturally  occurring  carbonyl compounds are mutagens  In  Salmo-
nella tester strain TA104.  Mutat.  Res.  148:  25-34.

McCalla, O.R.   1965.   Effect  of   nitrofurans  on the chloroplast  system  of
Euglena gradlls.  J.  Protozool.   12:  34-41.


0069d                               -50-                             01/06/88

-------
McKlllIp, W.J.  and E. Sherman.   1980.   Furan derivatives.   In:  K1rk-0thmer
Encyclopedia  of  Chemical  Technology,  Vol  11,  3rd  ed.,  M.  Grayson  and  D.
Eckroth, Ed.  John Wiley & Sons,  Inc.  New York.   p.  499-510.

Mill, T.  and  W.  Mabey.  1985.  Photochemical transformations.  JJK Environ-
mental Exposure  from  Chemicals,  Vol.  I., W.8. Neely and  G.E.  Blau, Ed.   CRC
Press, Inc., Boca Raton,  FL.  p.  209.

Mortelmans,  K.,  S. Haworth,  T.  Lawlor,  W. Speck,  B.  Talner and E.  Zelger.
1986.  Salmonella  mutagenlclty  tests.   II. Results  from  the testing of  270
chemicals.   Environ.   Mutagen.   8(Suppl.  7):  1-119.   (Taken  from  BIOSIS/
86/26737)

Nakahara, W. and K. Hor1.   1942.  Experimental  production of liver  cirrhosis
by furfural  feeding.  Gann.  35:  208.

Nicholas, H.J.   1973.   Miscellaneous  volatile  plant  products.   Phytochem-
1stry.  2: 381-399.

NIOSH  (National  Institute  for   Occupational  Safety   and  Health).    1984.
Current  Awareness  File.    RTECS  (Registry   of  Toxic  Effects  of Chemical
Substances).

NIOSH (National  Institute  for Occupational Safety and  Health).   1987.   RTECS
(Registry  of  Toxic  Effects  of  Chemical  Substances).   CAS  No. 98-01-1.
Online: January, 1987.
0069d                               -51-                             01/06/88

-------
NRC  (National  Research Council).  1982.   Formaldehyde  and other aldehydes.
U.S. EPA, Washington, DC.   p.  352.   EPA 600/6-82-002.

NTP  (National  Toxicology  Program).   1987.   Management Status Report.  Dated
1/9/87.

Oledzka, R.  and S.  Slkorskl.   1981.   The  Influence  of  furfural Inhalation
poisoning on calcium and  phosphorus metabolism In rats.   Pol. 3. Pharmacol.
Pharm.   33(2):  167-175.  [CA 95(23):198454d]

OSHA (Occupational  Safety and  Health  Administration).   1985.   Occupational
Standards Permissible Exposure Limits.   29  CFR  1910.1000.

Pawlowlcz,   A.,  H.  Droszcz,  A.  Garllck,  J.  Kutyla, H.  Kowalcyzyk  and Z,
KUnlkl.  1984.   Effect of  furfural  on  the  respiratory  system.   Med.  Pr.
(Poland).  35(1):  39-45.  (CA  101:176742m)

Pecora,  L.,  N. CastelUno  and  0.  Elmlno.   1961.   The  maximum acceptable
concentration 1n furfural  poisoning.   Pure  Appl.  Chem.  3:  179-182.

PelUzzaH,  E.D.,  T.D.  Hartwell, B.S.H.  Harris,  R.D. Waddell. D.A.  WhUaker
and  M.D.  Erlckson.  1982.   Purgeable  organic  compounds  In  mother's milk.
Bull. Environ.  Contain.  Toxlcol.   28: 322-328.

Perry,  R.H.  and D.U. Green.  1984.   Perry's Chemical Engineers Handbook, 6th
ed.  McGraw-Hill Book Company,  New  York.  p. 3-57.
0069d                               -52-                             01/06/88

-------
PHter,  P.    1976.   Determination  of  biological  degradabllHy  of organic
substances.   Water Res.   10:  231-235.

R1dd1ck, J.A., H.B. Bunger and T.K. Bakano.  1986.  Organic  solvents:  Physi-
cal  properties  and methods  of purification,  in:  Techniques  of Chemistry,
Vol. 2, 4th  ed.   W1ley-Intersc1ence,  New York.  p.  1119-1120.

Ruth, J.H.  1986.  Odor thresholds and  Irritation  levels of  several chemical
substances:  A review.   Am.  Ind. Hyg.  Assoc.  J.  47: A-142,  A-151.

Sasaki, S.  1978.  The  scientific  aspects  of the  chemical substance control
law  In   Japan.   in:   Aquatic  Pollutants:  Transformation  and  Biological
Effects, 0.  Hutzlnger,  L.H.  Von  Letyoeld and B.C.J. Zoeteman, Ed.  Pergamon
Press,  Oxford,  p. 283-298.

Sasaki, Y.  and   R.  Endo.   1978.   Hutagenldty  of  aldehydes  1n  Salmonella.
Mutat.  Res.   54(2):  251-252.

Sax, N.I., Ed.   1984.   Dangerous Properties of Industrial  Materials, 5th  ed.
Van Nostrand Relnhold Co.,  New York.   p. 1461.

Schmeltz,  I., J. Tosk, G.  Jacobs  and  D.  Hoffmann.   1977.  Redox  potential
and qulnone  content of cigarette smoke.   Anal. Chem.   49:  1924-1929.
              »
Sedlvec, V. and  J.  Flek.  1978.   Biologic  monitoring of  persons exposed  to
furfural vapors.   Int.  Arch.  Occup. Environ.  Health.   42(1):  41-50.
0069d                               -53-                             01/06/88

-------
Shackelford,  U.M.  and  L.H.  Keith.   1976.   Frequency  of  Organic  Compounds
Identified 1n Water.   U.S. EPA,  Athens,  GA.   EPA 600/4-76-062.

Shlmlzu,  A.   1986.  Experimental  studies  on hepatic  cirrhosis  and hepato-
cardnogenesls.  II.  Influence  of  drrhotlc  Hver  on  2-FAA hepatocardno-
genesls 1n rats.  Acta.  Pathol.  Jap.   36(7):  1039-1048.   (CA  105:16681,))

Soska,  J.,  B.  Koukalova  and L.  EbMnger.   1981.   Mutagenlc  activities of
simple  nltrofuran  derivatives:   I.  Comparison  of related compounds  In the
phage Inductest, chloroplast-bleachlng and bacterial-repair  and mutagenldty
tests.  Mutat. Res.  81(1):  21-26.

SRI  (Southern  Research  Institute).   1981a.   90-Day Rat Report.  Unpublished
Study performed for NTP.  Paper  obtained  from  NIOSH.

SRI  (Southern  Research  Institute).   1981b.   90-Day House  Report.  Unpub-
lished Study performed  for NTP.   Paper obtained  from  NIOSH.

SRI  (Stanford  Research  Institute).    1986.    1986  Directory  of  Chemical
Producers:  United  States of America.   SRI  International,  Menlo  Park, CA.
p. 697.

Stlch, H.F., M.P.  Rosin.  C.H. Wu and W.O.  PowMe.   1981.  Clastogenlclty of
furans found In food.   Cancer Lett.   13(2): 89-95.
0069d                               -54-                             01/06/88

-------
Swann, R.L., D.A.  Laskowskl,  P.J.  HcCall,  K. Vanderkuy and  H.J.  Dlshburger.
1983.  A  rapid method  for the  estimation  of  the environmental  parameters
octanol/water  partition  coefficient, soil  sorptlon constant,  water to  air
ratio and water solubility.  Residue Rev.   85:  17-28.

Tewarl,  Y.B.,  M.M.  Miller,  S.P.  Waslk and O.E.  Martlne.   1982.   Aqueous
solubility and  octanol/water  partition coefficient  of organic compounds  at
25°C.  J. Chem. Eng. Data.  27:  451-454.

Turnbull,  H.,  J.G.  Oemann and  R.F.  West on.   1954.   Toxldty  of  various
refinery materials to fresh water fish.   Ind. Eng. Chem.   46(2): 324-333.

U.S. EPA.  1977.   Computer print-out of nonconf1dent1al production  data from
TSCA Inventory.  OPTS, CIO, U.S.  EPA, Washington, DC.

U.S.  EPA.   1980.   Guidelines  and  Methodology  Used  In  the Preparation  of
Health  Effect  Assessment Chapters  of  the  Consent   Decree Water  Criteria
Documents.  Federal Register.   45(231):  49347-49357.

U.S.  EPA.   1985.   Reference  Values for  Risk Assessment.   Prepared by  the
Office  Health  and  Environmental   Assessment,  Environmental  Criteria  and
Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH for the  Office of Solid Waste,  Washington,
DC.
0069d                               -55-                             01/06/88

-------
U.S.  EPA.   1986a.  Methodology  for  Evaluating Potential  CardnogenlcHy  1n
Support  of  Reportable Quantity  Adjustments  Pursuant  to CERCLA  Section  102.
Prepared  by  the  Office  of Health  and Environmental  Assessment,  Carcinogen
Assessment  Group, for  the Office  of  Solid  Waste and Emergency  Response,
Washington, DC.

U.S.  EPA.   1986b.    Guidelines   for   Carcinogen  Risk  Assessment.   Federal
Register.  51(185):  33992-34003.

U.S. EPA.  1987a.  Graphical  Exposure  Modeling  System (GEMS).   Octanol/Water
Partition Coefficient  (CLOGP) and/or  Fate of  Atmospheric Pollutants  (FAP)
computer data system.   U.S. EPA,  Research Triangle Park, NC.

U.S. EPA.  1987b.  STORET Water Quality Data  Base.  Online: January,  198-7.   .

U.S.  EPA/NIH  (U.S.  Environmental  Protection   Agency/National  Institute  of
Health).  1987.   OHMTADS  (011 and  Hazardous  Materials Technical  Assistance
Data System).  CAS Registry No. 98-01-1.  Online:  February, 1987.

Usmanov,  M.K.  and Kh.  G. Akhmedkhodzhaeva.    1961.   Furfural poisoning and
Its control.  Sb. Nauchn.  Tr.  Tashkentsk.  Gos.  Med. Inst.   20:  182-185.  (CA
60:3416c)

Verschueren, K.   1983.  Handbook  of Environmental Data  on  Organic  Chemicals,
2nd ed.  Van Nostrand  Relnhold Co, New York.   p. 687.
0069d                               -56-                             01/06/88

-------
Wallen,  I.E.,  W.C.  Greer  and  R.  Lasater.   1957.   Toxlclty  to  Gambusla
afflnls  of  certain pure  chemicals  1n  turbid  waters.   Sewage  Ind. Hastes.
29(6): 695-711.

Weber, R.C., P.A.  Parker  and  M.  Bowser.  1981.  Vapor pressure  distribution
of  selected organic  chemicals.   U.S.   EPA,   Cincinnati,  OH.   p.  22.   EPA
600/2-81-021.

Wlndholz,  M.,  Ed.   1983.   Merck  Index,  10th  ed.  Merck  and  Co.,   Inc.,
Rahway, NJ.  p. 614.

Woodruff, R.C.,  J.M. Mason,  R. Valencia and  S.  ZlmmeHng.  1985.  Chemical
mutagenesls testing In DrosophHa.  V.  Results of  53 coded compounds tested
for the National  Toxicology Program.   Environ.  Mutagen.   7(5):  677-702.

Zdz1en1cka, M.,  B.  Tudek, M.  Zlelenska and T.  Szymczyk.   1978.   Mutagenlc.
activity of furfural In Salmonella typhlmurlum TA100.  Mutat.  Res.  58(2-3):
205-219.
0069d                               -57-                             01/06/88

-------
  Zdzlenlcka, H.,  B.  Tudek, M.  Zlelenska  and T.  Szymczyk.   1978.   Mutagenlc
  activity of furfural In Salmonella typhlmuMum TA100.  Mutat. Res.  58(2-3):
  205-219.
0069d
                                    ~57-                             06/25/87

-------
                                  APPENDIX A

                              LITERATURE SEARCHED



    This  HEED  Is  based  on  data  Identified  by  computerized  literature

searches of the following:


         TSCATS
         CASR online (U.S. EPA Chemical Activities Status Report)
         TOXLINE
         TOXBACK 76
         TOXBACK 65
         RTECS
         OHM TADS
         STORET
         SRC Environmental Fate Data Bases
         SANSS
         AQUIRE
         TSCAPP
         NTIS
         Federal Register


These searches were conducted  In  February,  1987.   In  addition,  hand searches

were made of  Chemical  Abstracts  (Collective Indices  5-9), and  the following

secondary sources should be reviewed:


    ACGIH (American  Conference of  Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).
    1986.   Documentation  of the  Threshold  Limit Values  and  Biological
    Exposure Indices, 5th ed.  Cincinnati, OH.

    ACGIH (American  Conference of  Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).
    1986-1987.  TLVs: Threshold Limit  Values for  Chemical Substances In
    the  Work  Environment  adopted  by  ACGIH with  Intended Changes  for
    1986-1987.  Cincinnati, OH.  Ill p.

    Clayton,  G.O.   and  F.E.  Clayton,  Ed.   1981.    Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene  and Toxicology,  3rd   rev.  ed., Vol.  2A.   John  Wiley  and
    Sons, NY.  2878 p.

    Clayton.  G.D.   and  F.E.  Clayton,  Ed.   1981.    Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene  and Toxicology,  3rd   rev.  ed., Vol.  28.   John  Wiley  and
    Sons. NY.  p. 2879-3816.

    Clayton,  G.D.   and  F.E.  Clayton,  Ed.   1982.    Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene  and Toxicology,  3rd   rev.  ed., Vol.  2C.   John  Wiley  and
    Sons, NY.  p. 3817-5112.
0069d                               -58-                             06/25/87

-------
    Grayson,  M.  and D.  Eckroth,  Ed.   1978-1984.   K1rk-0thmer Encyclo-
    pedia of  Chemical Technology, 3rd  ed.   John Wiley and Sons, NY.  23
    Volumes.

    Hamilton, A. and H.L.  Hardy.  1974.   Industrial  Toxicology, 3rd ed.
    Publishing Sciences Group, Inc., Littleton, MA.  575 p.

    IARC  (International  Agency  for Research  on  Cancer).  IARC  Mono-
    graphs  on  the Evaluation  of  Carcinogenic  Risk  of  Chemicals  to
    Humans.  WHO, IARC, Lyons, France.

    Jaber,  H.M.,  W.R.  Mabey,  A.T.   L1eu,  T.W.  Chou  and  H.L.  Johnson.
    1984.   Data   acquisition   for   environmental   transport   and   fate
    screening for  compounds  of Interest  to  the Office of  Solid  Waste.
    SRI   International,  Menlo   Park,   CA.    EPA   600/6-84-010.    NTIS
    PB84-243906.

    NTP  (National  Toxicology  Program).  1986.   Toxicology Research and
    Testing   Program.   Chemicals   on   Standard  Protocol.   Management
    Status.

    Ouellette,  R.P. and   J.A.  King.   1977.    Chemical  Week  Pesticide
    Register.  McGraw-Hill  Book Co., NY.

    Sax,  I.N.   1984.  Dangerous Properties  of  Industrial  Materials, 6th
    ed.  Van Nostrand Relnhold Co.,  NY.

    SRI  (Stanford   Research  Institute).   1986.   Directory of  Chemical
    Producers.  Menlo Park, CA.

    U.S.  EPA.   1986.   Report  on  Status  Report  In  the Special  Review
    Program,  Registration   Standards  Program  and  the  Data   Call  In
    Programs.   Registration  Standards  and  the  Data  Call   1n  Programs.
    Office of Pesticide Programs,  Washington,  DC.

    U.S.  EPA.   1985.  CSB  Existing  Chemical Assessment Tracking System.
    Name  and  CAS Number Ordered  Indexes.   Office of  Toxic  Substances,
    Washington,  DC.

    USITC  (U.S.  International   Trade   Commission).    1985.   Synthetic
    Organic  Chemicals.   U.S.  Production  and   Sales,  1984, USITC  Publ.
    1422, Washington,  DC.

    Verschueren, K.  1983.  Handbook  of  Environmental Data on Organic
    Chemicals, 2nd ed.   Van Nostrand Relnhold  Co., NY.

    Wlndholz, M., Ed.  1983.  The Merck Index,  10th  ed.   Merck and Co.,
    Inc., Rahway, NJ.

    Worthing, C.R.  and  S.B. Walker, Ed.   1983.  The  Pesticide Manual.
    British Crop Protection Council. 695  p.
0069d                               -59-                             06/25/87

-------
    In addition,  approximately 30  compendia  of aquatic  toxlclty data were

reviewed, Including the following:


    Battelle's  Columbus  Laboratories.   1971.   Water  Quality  Criteria
    Data  Book.    Volume  3.   Effects   of  Chemicals  on   Aquatic   Life.
    Selected Data  from the Literature  through  1968.   Prepared for  the
    U.S.  EPA under Contract No. 68-01-0007.  Washington,  DC.

    Johnson, W.W.  and  M.T. Flnley.   1980.  Handbook  of Acute  ToxIcHy
    of  Chemicals  to   Fish  and  Aquatic  Invertebrates.    Summaries   of
    Toxldty Tests  Conducted  at  Columbia  National  Fisheries  Research
    Laboratory.    1965-1978.    U.S.  Dept.  Interior,  Fish  and  Wildlife
    Serv. Res.  Publ.  137,  Washington,  DC.

    McKee, J.E.  and H.W.  Wolf.   1963.  Water  Quality Criteria, 2nd  ed.
    Prepared  for  the   Resources   Agency  of   California,   State   Water
    Quality Control Board.  Publ.  No.  3-A.

    Plmental, D.  1971.   Ecological Effects of  Pesticides  on  Non-Target
    Species.  Prepared  for the U.S.  EPA, Washington, DC.   PB-269605.

    Schneider,  B.A.  1979.  Toxicology  Handbook.  Mammalian and Aquatic
    Data.  Book 1: Toxicology  Data.   Office of  Pesticide  Programs, U.S.
    EPA,  Washington,  DC.  EPA 540/9-79-003.  NTIS  PB 80-196876.
0069d                               -60-                             06/25/87

-------
                                                                        APPENDIX B


                                                                Summary Table for Furfural
Species
Inhalation Exposure
Subchronlc haaster
Chrontc haaster
Carctnogenlclty ID
Oral Exposure
Subchronlc rat
Chronic rat
Carclnogenlclty 10
IMPORTABLE QUANTITIES
Based on Chrontc Toxlclty:
Based on Carclnogenlclty:
Exposure Effect
•'&•*•;.
>-|; '
20 ppa (7? ag/a*). 6 olfactory degeneratloh
hours/day. 5 days/week at higher levels. .- .;
for 13 weeks . ;„ .' C
20 ppa (77 ag/a*). 6 olfactory degeneration
hours/day. 5 days/week at higher levels * "•
for 13 weeks
ID ID /

11 ag/kg, 5 days/week. alld hepatocellular
13 weeks (7.9 ag/kg/day) vacuollzatlon
11 ag/kg. S days/week. «11d hepatocellular
13 weeks (7.9 ag/kg/day) vacuollzatlon
ID ID

100
10
RfD Reference
0.1 ag/kg/day or Feron
9 ag/day for a et al.. 1979
70 kg human
0.01 ag/kg/day or Feron
0.9 ag/day for a et al.. 1979
70 kg human
ID 10

0.008 ag/kg/day SRI. 1981a
or 0.6 ag/day
0.8 vg/kg/day or SRI. 1981 a
0.06 ag/day
10 10

SRI. 1981a
10
      10 - Insufficient data
in
>»
oo

-------