EPA 560/5-75-004             A  ., in_c
                      April 1975
    LABORATORY TEST
   METHODS TO ASSESS
THE EFFECTS OF CHEMICALS
      ON TERRESTRIAL
      ANIMAL  SPECIES

          FINAL REPORT

     Office of Toxic Substances
  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
      Washington, D.C. 20460

-------
                                        April 1975
    LABORATORY TEST METHODS TO ASSESS

 THE EFFECTS OF CHEMICALS ON TERRESTRIAL

             ANIMAL SPECIES
               Prepared by
Ryckman/Edgerley/Tomlinson & Assoc. Inc.
           12161 Lackland Rd.
       St. Louis, Missouri  63141
              Prepared for
       Office of Toxic Substances
  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
         Washington, D.C.  20"460
      Contract/Order No. 68-01-1896
            Project Director
             Mr. Frank Kover

-------
     This report has been reviewed by the Office of Toxic
Substances, EPA, and approved for publication.  Approval
does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the
views and policies of the the Environmental Protection  Agency,
nor does mention of trade names or commercial products
constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

-------
                     TABLE OF CONTENTS
                                                   Page  No.

Letter of Transmittal                                i
Title Page                                          ii
Table of Contents                                  iii
List of Tables                                     vii
List of Figures                                     ix
Abstract                                           xii
Acknowledgments                                    xiii

SECTION

    I    CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS              1

   II    INTRODUCTION                                 2

         Toxic Substances and the Environment         2
         Toxicity Testing:  An Historical
          Perspective                                 2
         Pertinent Legislation                        3
         Methodology Used in this Study               4

  III    SPECIAL PROBLEMS                             5

         Problems in Toxicity Testing                 5
         Variations in Experimental Design            5
            Homeothermic vs. Poikilothermic           5
            Sex, Weight and Age                       5
            Random Sampling Variation                 6
            Variations in Breeding and Holding
             Environs                                 7
            Genetic Variations                        8
            Non-Genetic Variations                    8
            Genetic Drift                             9
         Resistance                                   9
            Mechanisms                                9
            DDT Resistance - A Case Study            11
         Natural Selection                           11
         Testing of Dynamic Ecological
          Associations                               12
         Experimental Design of Test vs. Cost        13
         Wild Native Species vs. Domestic
          Laboratory Species                         14
         Chemical Problems  in Testing:
          Degradation                                15
                            111

-------
                  TABLE OF CONTENTS
                     (continued)
                                                Page  No,
         Nonbiological Oxidation,  Reduction
          and Hydrolysis                           15
         Nonbiological Miscellaneous Reactions     16
         Biological Oxidation,  Reduction and
          Hydrolysis      .                         16
      Dosages                                      17
      Biostatistics in Toxicological Testing       17
         Introduction                              17
         Randomization                             17
         Sample Size                               18
      The Normal Distribution                      18
         Tests of Hypotheses                       19
         Linear Regression and  Correlation         19

IV    ANIMAL SUITABILITY                           21

      Introduction                                 21
         Establishment of Animal Groupings         21
         Animal Suitability Tables                 22
      Invertebrates                                26
         Helminths                                 26
         Mollusca                                  29
         Arachnida                                 31
         Orthoptera                                3 5
         Hemiptera-Homoptera                       38
         Coleoptera                                40
         Lepidoptera                               42
         Diptera                                   45
         Hymenoptera                               50
         Miscellaneous Invertebrates               52
      Vertebrates                                  53
         Amphibians and Reptiles                   53
            Anurana                                55
            Chelonia                               62
            Squamata                               64
         Birds                                     69
            Pelecanidae and Phalacrocoracidae      73
            Gaviiformes and Podicipediformes       75
            Anseriformes                           76
            Procellariiformes                      86
            Ardeidae and Threskiornithidae         88
            Gruidae and Rallidae                   90
            Scolopacidae                           91
            Lari                                   93
            Picidae                                95
                       IV

-------
                 TABLE OF CONTENTS
                    (continued)
                                                Page No.

           Falconiformes and Strigiformes         .96
           Columbiformes                          100
           Colinus virginianus                    104
           Phasianus colchicus                    107
           Miscellaneous Galliformes              109
           Passeriformes                          111
           Domestic Galliformes                   121
           Galliformes:   Coturnix coturnix
            japonica                              124
           Exotics                                129
     Mammals                                      132
        Insectivora                               135
        Chiroptera                                140
        Lagomorpha                                143
        Rodentia                                  148
        Carnivora                                 176
        Ungulates                                 187
        Primata                                   205
        Marsupiala                                210
        Edentata                                  213
        Exotic Species                            216
     Suggested Species                            219
        Final List                                219
        Selection of Animal Species for Testing   221

V.   METHODOLOGIES                                225

     Introduction                                 225
        General Scientific Procedure              225
        Selection of Categories                   226
        Physical/Chemical Tables                  226
     Physical/Chemical Methods                    239
        Ciliary Transport                         239
        Stress                                    239
        Respiration                               240
        Enzymes                                   241
        Anesthesia                                242
        Telemetry                                 242
        Observe/Monitor                           242
        Population Dynamics                       243
        Chromatography       .                     244
        Residues                                  245
        Bioassay                                  245
        Metabolism                                246

-------
                  TABLE OF CONTENTS
                      (continued)
                                                 Page No.

          Genetics                                  246
          Anticholinesterases                       247
          Hepatic Studies                           247
          Endocrinology                             248
          Anatomy                                   248
          Physiology                                249
          Histology                                 249
          Pathology                                 250
          Pharmacology                              251
          Hematology                                251
          Oology                                    252
          Embryology                                252
          Other                                     253
       Behavioral Methods                           254
          Introduction                              254
          Repellents                                254
          Discrimination                            262
          Stress                                    266
          Pheromones                                267
          Neurophysiology                           267
          Other                                     268
          Instinct                                  270
          Learning                                  276
       Suggested Methodologies                      279
          Introduction                              279
          Suggested Approaches to Toxicity
           Testing                                  279
          General Studies                           283
          The Selection of Methods for
           Toxicity Testing                         283
          State-of-the-Art                          284
          The Future                                285
 VI.   APPENDICES
       A. Contacts and Consultants
       B. List of Suppliers
       C. Suggested Species Synopsis Sheets
VII.   BIBLIOGRAPHY
                         VI

-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table No. Page No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Suitability of Invertebrates for
Toxicological Testing
Composition of an Artificial Medium Used
for Rearing Noctuid Species
Suitability - Herpeto fauna
Food Recommended for Amphibian Larvae
Young Animals and Adults
Natural Breeding Habits of Common North
American and European Anura
Suitability of Birds for Toxicological
Testing
Distribution of Indigenous Breeding
Waterfowl Species by Zoogeographic
Regions
Incubation Periods of Various Waterfowl
Fledging Periods of Various Waterfowl
Some Longevity Records for Waterfowl
Suitability of Mammals for Toxicology
Testing
Composition of an Experimental Creep-
Feed
Breeding and Rearing Characteristics
of the Wild Rats
Components of the Standard Laboratory
Feed Used for Maintaining Microtus
ochrogaster in the Laboratory
Reproduction of M. ochrogaster in the
Laboratory at DirTerent Temperatures
25
43
54
57
58
70
77
81
82
84
133
145
153
164
165
       Vll

-------
                      LIST OF TABLES
                        (continued)

Table No.                                            Page  No.

  16       Reproduction of M. ochrogaster in the
           Laboratory on DifTerent Light Schedules     165

  17       Reproduction in Mustelidae Under  Natural
           Conditions                                 181

  18       Growth Ration                              193

  19       Gestation Ration                           194

  20       Maintenance Ration                         195

  21       Artificial Diets for Baby Pigs             196

  22       Final List of Suggested Species            219

  23       List of Suggested Species from Selected
           Terrestrial Animal Groups                  220

  24       Ecological Roles of Suggested Species      223

  25       Methodology:  Physiological                228

  26       Methodology:  Behavioral                   255

  27       Selected Approaches to Toxicity Testing     280

-------
           LIST  OF FIGURES
igure No. Page No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

17
18
19
Web Building Enclosure
Mallard Test Chamber
Raptor Cages Converted into Mallard Cages
Mallard Cages (Base 4 •' x: 4 ' )
Barn Owl Cages of Chicken Wire and Wood,
50' x 6" x 10', with Nest Boxes as Shown
Nest Box for Barn Owl Cages
Mourning Dove Cage
Food and Water Distribution System for
Mourning Dove Cages
Bobwhite Quail Outdoor Holding Pens
(Base approximately 4' x 8')
Starling and Wild Bird Cages
Wild Bird Traps - Birds Trapped Include
Starlings, Sparrows, Robins and Crows
Coturnix Laying Cages (12" x 10" x 16")
Coturnix Incubation Chamber
Coturnix and Mourning Dove Testing
Cages (10" x 10" x 12")
Miniature Swine Transport Apparatus
Miniature Swine Observation Enclosures
(20" x 30" Floor Area)
Miniature Swine in Holding Pen
(8' x 12' Floor Area)
Deer Holding Pen
Primate Cages - Squirrel Monkeys -
32
78
78
79
97
97
101
101
105
117
117
125
125
126
190

190
191
202

Metal - Commercially Available             206
                  IX

-------
                      LIST OF FIGURES
                        (continued)
Figure No.                                          Page

  20       Plexiglas and Metal - Fabricated at
           Iowa State                                 206

  21       Plexiglas Cage, Fabricated at Iowa
           State University                           207

  22       Trophic Triangle                           222

  23       The Interrelationships of Testing
           Methodologies                              238

  24       Diagram of Visual Acuity Chamber           263

  25       Cutaway of a Visual Cliff Used as a
           Test Apparatus                             264

  26       Discriminatory Device Used in Primate
           Testing               :                     265

  27       Inside of Visual Discrimination Chamber
           for Primate Testing                        265

  28       Wiring Diagram of Traffic Counter.
           Mountain Beaver Burrow with Pictorial
           Drawing of Burrow Probe in Place           269

  29(a)     Runways with Frightening Device at End     271

  29(b)     Runway Mechanism for Operating
           Frightening Device                         271

  29(c)     Runways, Frightening Device, and Camera
           Used to Record Chick's Response            271

  30(a)     Enclosure for 10 Runways                   272

  30(b)     Runway with Speaker at Far End             272

  30(c)     Holding Area - Point of Release            273

  31(a)     Examination Table Prior to Photographing
           Web                                        274

 31(b)    Examination  Table Prior  to Photographing
          Web                                         274

-------
                      LIST OF FIGURES
                        (continued)
Figure No.                                          Page No.

  32       Apparatus for Photographing Web            275

  33       An Automated Method for Studying
           Aggression in Primates                     277

  34       Succession of Toxic Response               282
                             XI

-------
                          ABSTRACT
This report presents a review of test species and method-
ologies utilized in toxicological research on terrestrial
animals.  It involved an extensive survey of available
literature, interviews with toxicologists, physiologists
and ecologists, and visits to research facilities around
the country.  The report contains reviews of each major
animal group and individual species where specific infor-
mation was available, that have been used as test subjects
in past or present toxicological research programs.
Suitability for use in such testing, both actual and
potential, and general information relative to laboratory
maintenance and possible alternative species is presented
for each group.  Brief synopses of general characteristics
for each group and/or species are also included.  Existing
methodologies used in toxicological research are dis-
cussed and evaluated for their particular applicability
to testing programs and general recommendations for
approaches to toxicity testing, test animals, and methods
are made.

This report was submitted in fulfillment of Project
Number        , Contract Number 68-01-1896,  by  Ryckman/
Edgerley/Tomlinson and Associates, Inc. under the sponsor-
ship of the Environmental Protection Agency.  Work was
completed as of April  1975.
                            Xll

-------
                     ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
                                 1
The investigation, data handling and report preparation
were performed by RETA and consultants.   Primary contribu-
tors were R. Matter, Project Scientist,  W.  Zegel,  Project
Manager, E. Edgerley, Project Principal, L. Hathaway,
T. Anderson, K. Cherryholmes, R. Bessent, K. Schaffer,
T. Weyenberg, M. Kane, C. Teig and B. Skwiot.  C.  Hamlin,
P. Braden, E. Ratz and M. McReynolds are given special
acknowledgment.

A special debt of gratitude  is owed  to those scientists  and
technicians  from numerous university research teams and
private  industries who gave  of their time,  ideas and
information.

Keith Long,  Director  of  the  Institute of Agricultural
Medicine, University  of  Iowa, who reviewed  the draft docu-
ment and whose  comments  and  interests were  very beneficial
to  the  RETA staff is  acknowledged with  sincere thanks.

RETA extends thanks  to  the EPA,  Washington, D.  C.  personnel
including M.  Prival  and  F. Kover for their interest  and
schedule considerations.
                            Xlll

-------
                         SECTION I

              CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Selection of test organisms should depend primarily on the
following criteria:

1.   The trophic level at which the test substance is known
     to effect a reaction, either directly or indirectly.

2.   The general habitat in which the test substance is
     used.

3.   The availability of the organism and level of back-
     ground information on the prospective test species.

4.   The degree to which the test species represents a
     trophic level and accommodates the testing methodologies
     of the program.

Optimally, multispecies test programs in which a number of
trophic levels are represented should prod-ice results of
greater ecological significance.  Such programs, though
more difficult to design, fund and manage than traditional
single species tests, will hopefully illustrate composite
effects of test substances on ecosystems instead of indi-
vidual species.

Toxic substances can only be termed detrimental if they
adversely affect the reproductivity of a species.  There-
fore, methodologies used in toxicity testing should be
selected for their ability to show short or long-term
effects on the survival of the test species  (e.g., genera-
tion studies at subacute dosages).  If this approach is
followed, morbidity and functional studies, biochemical
analyses and residue determinations are significant only
to the extent that they aid in projecting or precisely
determining the eventual effects of the test substance on
the species' survival  (short and/or long-term).  Ultimately,
toxicity testing results should provide an indication of
the relative health of the ecosystem.

-------
                          SECTION  II

                         INTRODUCTION


 TOXIC SUBSTANCES  AND THE ENVIRONMENT

 This  report reviews terrestrial animal species and existing
 testing methodologies  to assess their suitability for use
 in  toxicological  testing.  A toxic substance has been de-
 fined as a man-made chemical or man-caused concentration of
 chemicals which may come in contact with living organisms
 other than man, either accidentally or purposely, on a
 small or large scale.  This definition has been used to
 avoid the problematic  aspects of  the concept of toxicity.
 For example, many naturally occurring compounds  (certain
 plant fluids and  animal  secretions) are toxic if ingested
 or  touched.

 Toxicity is incremental,  depending on such factors as the
 concentration of  the substance in question, the contact
 organism and its  immune  systems,  sensitivities, and toler-
 ance  levels, and  on routes of exposure.  Some compounds,
 which are essential to living systems, are beneficial at
 low concentrations and lethal at  high concentrations (e.g.,
 salts and trace elements).  The effects of toxic chemicals
 can also be very  slight  and only  discernible after long
 periods  of time,  even  several generations.  In wild animals
 the level could be so  low as to be unmeasurable, but still
 affect the ability of  the creature to survive in a natural
 system.

A more thorough and sophisticated testing system is required
 to overcome these difficulties in assessing toxic substances,
This  report provides the  basic data on selection of test
 species  and methods necessary to  develop this system.  It
.presents  the judgments of the scientific community on the
 suitability of certain animals and methods for use in toxi-
cological testing and, in that light, attempts to determine
the adequacy of present  testing procedures.

TOXICITY  TESTING:  AN  HISTORICAL  PERSPECTIVE

Modern toxicology is considered to have begun with the work
of M. J. B.  Orfila (1787-1853)  who investigated toxic chemi-
cals  and  their effect on physiology.  His two-volume trea-
tise  served as a  basic reference  for many years.  Since

-------
Orfila's time, the science of toxicology has  grown  steadily
and incorporated discoveries and technology from chemical
and biological disciplines.

A rapid evolution in the science of toxicology has  occurred
in the past few decades.  In addition to the  older  LD5Q  and
percutaneous tests, teratogenic, carcinogenic, biochemical,
and behavioral methods have been introduced as more effi-
cient and effective ways of quantifying and defining tox-
icity.  This evolution has been provoked primarily  by the
increasing amount of chemicals introduced by  man into the
environment.

PERTINENT LEGISLATION

Toxic substance control legislation deals primarily with
pesticide useage.  The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act
of 1938 is the cornerstone of all present pesticide legis-
lation in the U.S.  This act deals primarily  with the con-
trols placed on useage of economic poisons in the natural
environment.  In 1955, an amendment to the hct defined an
orderly procedure for establishing pesticide  tolerance
levels and provided penalties for violations   (1).

The welfare of animals used in biological research  is con-
trolled by Public Law 89-544, enacted in 1966 (2),  and its
amendment, Public Law 91-579 of 1970 (3).  The purpose of
the original Act was to establish the Secretary of  Agri-
culture's authority to license and regulate suppliers of
laboratory animals.  The Act as amended in 1970 states:

     The Secretary shall promulgate standards to govern
     the humane handling, care, treatment, end transpor-
     tation of animals by dealers, research facilities,
     and exhibitors.  Such standards shall include  mini-
     mum requirements with respect to handling, housing,
     feeding, watering, sanitation, ventilation, shelter
     from extremes of weather and temperatures, adequate
     veterinary care, including the appropriate use of
     anesthetic, analgesic or tranquilizing drugs,  when
     such use would be proper in the opinion of the
     attending veterinarian of such research facilities,
     and separation by species when the Secretary finds
     such separation necessary for the humane handling,
     care, or treatment of animals.

As of 1971, legislation concerning toxic substances  (cadmium,
mercury, miscellaneous heavy metals, PCB's, etc.,)  had been
promulgated by a number of different federal agencies.  Sec-
tion 12 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act passed

-------
in 1970 is concerned with toxic materials discharged into
navigable waters.  The Clean Air Amendments of 1970 contain
a section directly related to hazardous substances.  The
Department of Transportation regulates transport of hazard-
ous materials with legislation such as the Transport of
Explosives Act and Hazardous Cargo Act (4).  Current legis-
lation applicable to pesticides includes the Federal Envi-
ronmental Pesticide Control Act of 1972.  Major concerns
of this act are registration of pesticides under EPA guide-
lines, statements of use, and unlawful acts in relation to
pesticide sale, distribution and use.

METHODOLOGY USED IN THIS STUDY

Data presented in this report were gathered from a variety
of sources by several means.  First, a literature search was
conducted in over 120 scientific journals.  Further relevant
literature sources were identified and obtained from bib-
liographies and from interviews with scientists conducted
by phone.  In addition to phone contacts, a number of visits
were made to particularly interesting and relevant research
facilities where information was gathered using sketches,
photographs, further interviews and, in some cases, actual
observation of testing procedures.  Finally, outside con-
sultants and correspondence with the Environmental Protec-
tion Agency offered direction and review throughout the
preparation of this document.  (A list of contacts and
visits can be found in Section VI.)

-------
                        SECTION III

                     SPECIAL PROBLEMS
PROBLEMS IN TOXICITY TESTING

Special problems inherent in toxicological testing revolve
around the ramifications of experimental manipulations of
biological systems.  Such deliberate interventions by
toxicologists are termed treatments.  A direct result pro-
duced by a specific treatment is described as an effect.
The primary goal in designing and conducting a toxi-
cological experiment is to ensure, insofar as possible,
that no factor other than the treatment will contribute
to the observed effects. Unfortunately, this ideal
situation is almost impossible to attain due to extraneous
influences.  Therefore, it is imperative to insure that all
influences except those of the treatment will act equally
on the test (treated) animals and the control animals
(those exposed to identical conditions excluding the
treatment).

VARIATIONS IN EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Homeothermic vs. Poikilothermic

The predominance of homeothermic animals in toxicity
testing is immediately apparent in a review of the
literature.  There seems to be greater scientific
knowledge pertaining to the physiology, metabolism,
biochemistry and behaviorisms of homeotherms than there
is for these same parameters in poikilotherms.  Poikilo-
therms, however, pose a special problem in toxicity
testing.  They must be maintained in a carefully controlled
environment since their metabolic rate is &. function  of
environmental temperatures.  Environmental control is
important to all toxicity testing since inaclmissable
experimental error would be produced if the metabolic rate
of the test animal fluctuated from  one exposure of the
toxin to the next.

Sex, Weight and Age

Sex, weight and age variations  influence  many toxicity
tests.  Researchers using mammals and primates tend  to
use males because of the problems encountered with the
estrous and menstrual cycle of  the  females.  Not only
do these cycles arouse the male animals being kept in the

-------
same laboratory, but they also greatly affect the physiology
of the two groups.  However, it is not scientifically sound
to extrapolate male toxicity data to females  (5).  The
fluctuations in hormone levels, coupled with the nervous
stress created by the estrous and menstrual cycles, may
greatly influence the results of a specific toxicity test.

Unless  the toxicity test  is aimed  at postnatal  toxicology,
age  variation  is  often  introduced  since  test  animals  are
generally selected  from a stock  of sexually mature
animals  (6).   The very  old animal  is almost always  ex-
cluded  from toxicity testing.  Closely related  to age is
the  weight of  the test  animal.   When the test animals
are  sexually mature,  their weights are comparable within
a certain deviation.  Test animals that  are procured
through  animal supply houses ace supplied with  a  controlled,
well-balanced  diet, and are relatively uniform  in weight.
Undernourished or extremely obese  animals are normally
excluded from  laboratory  supply  house stocks.

Age, weight, and  sex must be considered  when  interpreting
toxicity test  results.  The very young animal does  not
respond  (detoxify)  to toxic materials nearly  as fast  as
the  sexually mature,  while the very old  animal  has  even
less ability to detoxify  poisonous materials.   Weight can
be the key factor in determining a test  animal's  tolerance
of a certain poison.  The undernourished as well  as the
extremely obese animal  is much more prone tc  a  high mor-
tality rate  with  a  given  toxin than a well  nourished
animal of the  same  species (5).

Random Sampling Variation

Random sampling can be  defined as  selecting individuals
in such a manner  that every animal  in a  population  has
an equal  and independent  chance  of being chosen.  Unfor-
tunately,  human errors  and natural  phenomena  frequently
bias a "random" sample.   When researchers are selecting
animals from within a species group, it is  easy to introduce
variation into the sample by  choosing potential test animals
that are less alert or slower to escape the collector.
The collector is also frequently prejudiced by a potential
test animal's well being  (e.g., healthy looking fur, skin,
teeth,  etc.).  Thirdly,  docile animals within a species
group are normally selected over pugnacious fellow-members.
These selection tendencies could all greatly bias a toxicity
test.

In addition to the problem of random selection within a
species group,  there is a lack of true random selection

-------
between various animal groups.   As stated previously,
homeothermic animals are generally selected for research
much more frequently than poikilothermic animals.  Animals
that adapt well to laboratory environments are chosen
over those animal groups that do not.  Size is another
factor which will bias the sampling of various animal
groups; small sized  (rodents) to moderately sized (sheep)
animals are preferred over large animals  (moose) due to
the limitations of laboratory space.  Polyestrous animals
are more desirable than monestrotis animals such as toxicity
test animals, especially in chronic studies dealing with
a toxin's effect on  fecundity and transplacental migration.
These kinds of biases affect the true random selection of
toxicity test animals.  One must also consider the possi-
bility that the effects demonstrated in the laboratory by
a wild animal are not necessarily those which a toxin
would produce in the animal's natural environment.

Variations in Breeding and Holding Environs^

Variations are  introduced  into  toxicological  testing by
the ease of procurement  of certain  animals which are
potentially good test animals.   Researchers have two main
avenues to obtain  toxicological  test animals:   biological
supply houses,  and  actual  field capture of test animals.
"Animals for  Research"  (7),  a publication of  the Institute
of Laboratory Animal Resources,  National  Research Council
of the National Academy  of Sciences, lists 315  biological
supply houses throughout the  United States that specialize
in selling various  species of test  animals.   The animals
available through these  supply  houses  fall into two
categories:   (1) domestic  laboratory animals  and (2)
animals collected in the wild — 19 phyla of  animals from
all over the  world.

The major problems  associated with  animals collected from
the natural environment  are:  (1)  the high cost  per animal,
(2) the possibility  of collecting diseased animals and
(3) the rarity  of certain  species.   It is not uncommon for
large terrestrial animals, e.g.,  Artiodactyla,  to cost
$200 to $1,500  per  animal, depending on the species  used.
Even the smaller animals,  carnivores and  rodents, are
generally very  expensive compared to most domestic labora-
tory animals.   Animals collected in the wild  and then
brought into  animal  supply houses often suffer  from  disease
or stress.  The animal may have been captured because it
was diseased  and not as  alert as its more healthy brothers.
In addition,  the stress  and  fear involved in  the capturing
can render these animals more sensitive to toxicants than
other members of their species  in the  wild.   Thus,  these

-------
 animals may introduce significant bias into toxicity
 testing.  Many species sought as test animals also fall
 into the rare or endangered species category.  The En-
 dangered Species Conservation Act of 1969, Public Law
 91-135, sets very stringent regulations on the use of
 endangered animal species as toxicological test subjects.
 The best solution for obtaining an ample supply of native
 North American terrestrial animals for toxicological
 testing is to collect animals that are easily bred and
 maintained in captivity.  Collection of these potential
 wild test species should be confined to geographical
 areas where environmental contamination is minimaJ to
 avoid collecting animals which have developed resistances.
 If the animal does not lend itself to breeding in captivity
 or if it is from an area of heavy environmental contami-
 nation, it should be viewed with skepticism as a potential
 test subject.  Repeated collection of a certain species
 from the wild should also be avoided since this may
 seriously deplete species numbers.  It must be kept in
 mind that a breeding colony of."wild" animals in the
 laboratory is very different from a breeding colony in
 nature, and is subject to a loss of the genetic diversity
 which enables wild populations in the natural environment
 to adapt to change.

 Genetic Variations

 Genetic variations involve a chemical rearrangement of an
 organism's DNA which produces a mutant form.  This vari-
 ation or change may be very subtle (alteration in a single
 enzyme's activity) or the change may be very drastic such
 as the critical shortening of the wings on a bird.
 Mutation is the original source of variation within a
 biological  system,  but  it is  only through  many sexual  re-
 combinations  that a  mutation  establishes itself in the
 species.  Mutations  occur constantly  in biological
 organisms.  The average  spontaneous rate for a given gene
 locus  is  1-2  mutations per 100,000 genes per generation
 (8).   Of  these  mutations, the vast majority are of a
 detrimental rather than  of a  useful nature.   However,  to
 remain viable under  continuous  environmental changes,  it
 is extremely  important for the  population  to carry  this
 potential for change.

 Non-Genetic Variations

 There are instances where  non-inherited changes will occur
 in .an animal, altering body structures, functions and
behavior, without being  transmitted to  the next gene-

-------
ration.  For example, if certain muscles are used very
intensively in an animal they become much thicker and
stronger; if one organ is removed such as the kidney,
the other kidney will increase in size and degree of
function.  Skin in areas that receive a lot of rubbing
or pressure become very thick and impervious.  Animals
that are exposed intermittantly for short periods to
extremely cold weather or perhaps low oxygen concentrations
can learn to acclimate, whereas they would have died had
they been suddenly introduced to these environmental
conditions.

Genetic Drift

Biological variation in a population is greatly reduced if
the gene pool is small; some of the more uncommon vari-
ations of the pbpulation-at-large will not be represented
or will be lost.  This phenomenon is commonly referred
to as genetic drift, which is simply the raudom loss or
gain of genes rather than loss or gain by natural selection
in large gene pools.

RESISTANCE

Resistance is a phenomenon resulting from a combination of
biological variations and genetic adaptation.  In toxicity
testing, resistance is the developed ability of a species
to tolerate dosages of toxicants which would once have
been lethal to 50 percent  (LD50) of the individuals
within a population.

Mechanisms

The vast majority of data collected on resistance deals
primarily with the various economic poisons.  An animal's
resistance to an economic poison is observed as the  pro-
gressive inability of a given compound applied at a
fixed rate to achieve control on its target organisms.
The mechanisms involved in developing resistance to
economic poisons are very similar to those used to avert
mortality and morbidity from other toxicants encountered
by animals in the natural environment.

It has been discovered that resistance can be induced in
laboratory test species by exposing the test animals to
toxic levels which kill 90 percent of the population, and
then breeding the survivors.  Ozburn and Morrison  (9) have
bred white laboratory mice  (Mus musculus) in order to
develop a strain that after nine generations is 1.7  times
more tolerant to DDT than the controls.  Dosages of  DDT
to which these mice are exposed kill the control animals.

-------
 Recent toxicological  testing confirms  that there  are  four
 mechanisms working simultaneously or independently  to
 develop resistance:   (1)  physiological mechanisms that
 reduce the penetration  and transportation  of  a  toxin  to
 the site of action{10);  (2)  unusual capacities  for
 storing toxins at inert sites coupled  with rapid  excretion
 (10);  (3)  microsomal  detoxification  (10);  and (4) genetic
 resistance resulting  from selective breeding  within a
 population (9).   It has been found that reduced penetration
 and transportation, rapid excretion and microsomal  de-
 toxification are manifested in populations of animals that
 have never been exposed to toxic materials.

 Reduced penetration is  significant because even a small
 reduction  in the rate with which a toxin enters an  animal
 may enhance the  activity  of detoxification centers.

 Certain animals  have  capacities for storing toxins  in
 inert  areas of  their  body which prevent toxins  from
 entering metabolic pathways.   Chlorinated  hydrocarbon
 pesticides  can be assimilated in the adipose  tissue of
 animals having ample  adipose reserve.   Once isolated.in
 the adipose tissue, chlorinated hydrocarbons  exert  little
 if  any effect on the  animal  until  the  animal  is forced
 to  catabolize the tissue.   This delayed reaction  can  be a
 significant effect of a toxin in a time of stress.  The
 increased  excretion of  toxins has  not  been verified.
 It  is  believed that certain enzymes convert foreign
 substances  into  less  toxic materials by making  them more
 water  soluble.   These enzymatic reactions  are accompanied
 by  reduced  tubular reabsorption in the kidney which in-
 creases  urine output.

 Microsomal  enzyme systems  play a primary role in  the
 metabolism  of foreign chemicals.   Anything which  tends to
 change  the  effectiveness of  this system in metabolizing
 toxins  alters the resistance  of the animal.   Microsomal
 enzyme  induction is another phenomenon related  to
 resistance.  Chlorinated hydrocarbons  are  very  good
 microsomal  enzyme inducers.   Chlordane increases  the
metabolism  of hexabarbital  aminopyrene and chloro-
promazine  (11).

 Research by Webb et al.  (6)  offers preliminary  support
 for the  thesis that genetics  play  a role in specific
resistance  processes.  Pine mice (Pitymys  pinetorum)
were exposed to  endrin in  apple orchards in Maryland  and
Virginia and then live-trapped and brought into the
 laboratory  and bred.  Offsprings of these  field-trapped
pine mice were held between  60-90  days  after  birth and
then LD5Q values  were established  using endrin.   It was


                             10

-------
the cohsensus of Webb et al.  that the results of their
toxiclty studies on first generation offspring raised
under a pesticide-free environment offered preliminary
support for a genetic basis for the demonstrated endrin
resistance.  Other genetic work by Cory et al. (12)  supports
the thesis that exposure to environmental  levels of  DDT
induced chromosomal changes in Drosophila pseudoobscura.

DDT Resistance - A Case Study

The most celebrated case of resistance recorded in the
scientific literature is that which houseflies (Musea
domestica) have developed to DDT.  The work of Sternburg
and Kearns (13) demonstrated that resistant houseflies
have a high titer of DDT - dehydrochlorinase which allows
them to dehydrochlorinate DDT to DDE.  There is good
information to substantiate a correlation between dehydro-
chlororinase activity and DDT resistance.

It was first believed that only the cuticle of resistant
flies was the site of the enzymatic reduction (14);
however, later work has demonstrated that: most tissues of
the resistant flies are active (16) .  Refined genetic
procedures conducted on the housefly by Lovell and Kearns
(17) reflected the fact that dechlorination and resistance
were genetically linked.  It is also the belief of pesti-
cide toxicologists that the development of DDT de-
chlorinating ability in the housefly is preadaptive, that
is to say, it already existed prior to DDT application.

Resistance is important in toxicity testing because the
possibility always exists that researchers will select
test animals that possess one or all of the resistance
mechanisms for a particular toxin.  These biased test
animals can produce erroneous dose/effect responses.
This is at best misleading and could be devastating if,
for example, the results are used to set threshold
exposure limits.

NATURAL SELECTION

Natural selection involves a combination of environmental
and interspecies pressures.  Most species produce more
offspring than can possibly survive, necessitating a
competition for existence.  Structural, functional, and
behavioral variations in some individuals provide them
with advantages over other individuals who lack these
distinctions.  These variations must- be phenotypic before
natural selection can occur.  If they are, they will
make a much greater contribution to the gene pool of
                            11

-------
 the next generation.  Accumulation of  a desirable variation
 within a population  generally  facilitates  the  species
 adaption to  its  environment, enhancing its chances  for
 survival.

 When the ratio of one characteristic to another changes
 from 1:00  :  1:00 to  1:01  :  1:00  in each generation,  it
 is  known that more individuals with this characteristic
 are surviving than are  individuals without it  (8).   With
 a selective  advantage of  1  in  100, it  has  been demon-
 strated that a dominant characteristic will become
 established  in 99 percent of a population  in about  1200
 generations  (18), a  rapid evolution rate.  When selection
 has decreased to 1 in 100,000  or more, evolution is  rela-
 tively slow.  The phenomenon of  natural selection and its
 effect on  speciation can  introduce a great amount of dis-
 torted data  in toxicological testing.  Species collected
 in  geographical areas where natural selection  and
 resistance have influenced  the population  will be entirely
 different  from the same species  collected  in areas where
 the parameters of selection and  resistance are dissimilar.
 Hence,  the dynamic processes of  resistance and natural
 selection must be taken into careful consideration when
 selecting  species of toxicological test animals.

 TESTING OF DYNAMIC ECOLOGICAL  ASSOCIATIONS

 An  ecosystem may be generally  thought  of as the biotic
 community and abiotic environment functioning  together
 as  a  system.  From a structural  standpoint there are four
 constituents in the ecosystem:   (1) abiotic substances
 which are basic elements  and compounds of  the  environment;
 (2)  producers, the autotrophic organisms that  are com-
 prised largely of green plants;  (3) consumers, the
 heterotrophic animals that  ingest other organisms or par-
 ticulate organic matter;  and (4) the decomposers, the
 heterotrophic organisms,  chiefly bacteria, that
 break down complex materials from dead biota.

 The use of model ecosystems has  recently been  recognized
 as  being a valuable tool  in toxicity testing.  The
majority of  the environmental  toxicological testing  to
date  has involved the use of aquatic ecosystem models.
Kapoor et al. have constructed several aquatic model
ecosystems to assess the  biodogradability  of pesticides (19)

The use of terrestrial ecosystems in toxioity  testing is
still  in the developmental stages.  Terrestrial model
ecosystems containing a predator require sizeable en-
closures and refinement (20).
                            12

-------
A food web is the system of dynamic transfer of food
energy from primary producers (plants)  through various
trophic levels.  It has been estimated by ecologists
that food webs allow approximately 10 percent of the
energy entering one trophic level to pass on to the next
higher level.  The least complex version of this type
of system takes the form of a pyramid, with each suc-
cessive population receiving approximately a tenth of the
energy received at the level below it.

Unfortunately, nature seldom builds communities with such
a simple structure and the use of food webs as tools to
measure the biological magnification of environmental
toxins is not without problems.' Almost invariably, energy
is not passed along neatly ordered chains, but instead is
transferred to a great many organisms through a highly
complex sprawling web of pathways.  It is this inherent
complexity that becomes one of the principal factors to
be considered in investigating how toxic materials are
disseminated and concentrated within food webs.

Another factor that becomes a problem in using food
webs as toxicity test devices is the nature of the various
metabolic processes of the members of a food web.
Normally less than 50 percent of the products of metabo-
lism go into the construction of new tissue, the remainder
is spent as respiration.  The crux of the problem is that
some substances within a food web are not involved in
respiration, and consequently not excreted efficiently.
Therefore, these materials may be concentrated in the
tissues twofold or more when passed from one population
to another  (21).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN OF TEST vs. COST

The experimental design of a toxicity test dictates  the
cost of the research project.  In toxicity testing,  two
major considerations are reflected in costs:   (1) retro-
spective versus prospective studies and  (2)  field investi-
gations.  A retrospective study examines the distribution
of concentrations of toxins in the physical  aspects  of
an ecosystem and the biological aspects.  From this  residue
data, an attempt is made to assess the impact  of the
various toxins on the animals colleqted.  Retrospective
tests rely  very heavily on  data  that has already been
collected and are usually of a shorter duration  and  are
much less costly than prospective  studies.

Prospective studies are those that start with  a  thesis
which is to be experimentally tested, e.g.,  to ascertain
                            13

-------
 if  exposure  to  200 ppb  of polychlorinated biphenyls
 (PCB's)  in crayfish will have  any  chronic effect on the
 fecundity of raccoons fed on these crayfish.  In this
 example, mature raccoons must  be used that are known not
 to  have  been exposed to PCB's  (laboratory reared subjects,
 perhaps) and they must  be fed  for  one year or more on
 dosed  crayfish  containing 200  ppb  of PCB's.  During this
 study  period the levels of PCB's in the crayfish and
 raccoon  must be closely monitored.  Observations must
 be  made  on the  reproduction capabilities of these test
 animals.  Even  if reproduction is  accomplished in these
 animals, it  may be necessary as well to observe their
 offspring for possible  effects.  It is clear from this
 example  that prospective testing can become highly complex
 and in general  is more  costly  than retrospective testing.

 Field  investigations are usually concerned with monitoring
 toxic  residues  in terrestrial  animals and comparing
 these  levels to those found in the air, water and soil of
 the animal's ecosystem.  Generally, the volume of bio-
 chemical analyses, tissue residue  level determinations
 and histopathology examinations required by field studies
 are fewer than  in laboratory studies.  Field investi-
 gation studies  will frequently require the services of a
 commercial laboratory to conduct the biochemical, histo-
 pathological and residue analyses.  Although these two
 characteristics sometimes make field studies less costly
 than laboratory studies, it is generally the latter type
 of  study that is more expensive.   There are unique
 features which  make laboratory studies more costly than
 field  studies:   (1) animal maintenance, including
 veterinary services; (2) original  cost of the test
 animals; (3)  sophisticated laboratory instrumentation;
 (4)  large numbers of technically trained personnel; and
 (5)  the  fact that they  are generally prospective studies
 (whereas field  studies  are generally retrospective).

 WILD NATIVE  SPECIES vs. DOMESTIC LABORATORY SPECIES

 A unique group  of domestic animals has been bred for use
 in  biological research  throughout  the world.  This group
 includes white  mice and rats of various strains, crickets,
 chickens, ducks, guinea pigs,  hamsters, gerbils, dogs,
 cats,  etc.    The majority of these  animals reproduce at
 relatively fast rates,  are easily  maintained in a labora-
 tory environment, and have been inbred (especially the
white  mice and  rats) to produce a  very homogenous,
well-defined animal.  Inbreeding results in a loss of the
 genetic diversity and plasticity which a natural population
of  animals relies on to adapt  to changing environmental


                           14

-------
conditions, and, in this sense, laboratory animals are
no longer representative of wild populations.

Laboratory rats and mice -are excellent test animals where
the experimental design calls for consistent, genetically
similar animals in large quantities.  However, using these
domestic animals in environmental toxicological testing
may bias the results and not really reflect the reactions
that a natural population might exhibit.  For this reason,
new animals, either naturally or captively bred, should
be added to each captive colony, periodically introducing
new wild-type genes.  The results of toxicity testing on
animals from populations whose ancestors have been sub-
jected to natural selection would seem to be less biased
and much more indicative of the real impact of a toxin
on the natural environment.

Wild animal species recommended for toxicity testing are
reviewed in detail in the Animal Suitability section of
this report.

CHEMICAL PROBLEMS IN TESTING:  DEGRADATION

Once released into the environment, chemical toxicants
undergo a continual dynamic change with the rate of
change being governed by the chemical stability of the
toxin.  Environmental toxicants, in general, go through
two degradation processes:   (1) nonbiological transfor-
mations and (2) biological transformations.

Nonbiological Oxidation, Reduction and Hydrolysis

Except for a few locations (i.e., certain soil types),
oxygen is a ubiquitous force for environmental transfor-
mation of toxicants, especially pesticides.  The usual
reactions of oxygen focus around the free-radical character
of its usual triplet electronic state.  However, recent
research has revealed the significance of the more
reactive double-boned singlet oxygen produced by both
light and chemical means  (22) .  Photooxidation at aliphatic
carbons is a common reaction in some pesticides.  However,
DDT is normally very resistant to oxidation  - either
photochemical or otherwise - given normal temperatures
and light.

The removal of hydrogen atoms from organic solvents by
free radicals is well understood.  Photochemical study of
pesticides has revealed that energetic irradiation in
methanol will lead to the replacement of aromatic ring
halides with hydrogens  (22).  Strictly chemical reductions
                            15

-------
by  transitional metal ions are probably very widespread
throughout the environment, but have not been reported
in  the literature.  A good example of this type of
reaction is the reduction of DDT to DDD by iron
porphyrins.

Water, like air, is present to some degree almost every-
where in the natural environment.  Water has unique
chemical properties:  it has high heat capacity, polarity,
is  a good solvent, and is transparent to uv light; thus
it  is an extremely important medium for chemical re-
actions.  Pesticide hydrolysis occurs very readily and
many researchers are surprised that the extent of these
environmental transformations has received so little
attention (22) .

Nonbiological Miscellaneous Reactions

A number of degradation reactions have been reported
under various other environmental conditions.  It has been
demonstrated that dieldrin undergoes an internal cycli-
zation in the presence of light to form photodieldrin
(22).  Many organophosphorus esters such as the phos-
phorothionates will isomerize under the influence of
heat and light.

Biological Oxidation, Reduction and Hydrolysis

Generally all biochemical oxygenations of pesticides and
other toxins are carried out by low-specificity, mixed-
function oxidases often localized in microsomes or
similar structures.

Reduction of toxins through metabolic pathways is much
less obvious than oxidative processes, perhaps because
life exists in and on an oxidizing system.  The biological
reduction of C-C double bonds has been suggested to
explain the intermediates observed in the metabolism of
DDT and its chlorinated hydrocarbon relatives; however,
simple olefins to not display these reduction products.

It has been found that pesticides react with water within
living organisms.  The hydrolysis of the epoxide ring of
dieldrin has provided one of the most important routes
for the metabolic degradation of dieldrin.  Hydrolysis,
however, like many other types of environmental trans-
formations,  is not always straightforward.  The primary
route for the detoxification of DDT in animals is by
the hydrolysis of the trichloromethyl group to a
carboxyl group.
                           16

-------
DOSAGES

Dosages used on test animals in toxicity testing can be
critically important in obtaining reliable test results.
As discussed under Biological Variation, individuals from
a homologous population display variations.  The real
nature of these variations is seldom obvious except when
the organisms are challenged, such as by exposure to a
toxic material.  For example:  if the toxic agent is
capable of producing an observable effect  (such as death),
then the chemical dose can be selected to produce that
effect on each test animal in a series of tests using
the same species group.  However, it has been demonstrated
that, if the effect could be measured by means other than
death, then the test would show that not all members of
the group responded in the same manner.

Another problem associated with dosages is the method
used to administer the toxin.  Methods include filling
gelatin capsules with a prescribed dose, injecting marsh-
mallows with the toxin by using a microsyringe, and putting
the toxin dosage into the animals' normal food or water.
It is questionable whether the test animal really receives
the intended dosage since some of the dosed food may spill
or the loaded marshmallows may be unpalatable.

There are four major routes to administer toxicants:
(a) percutaneous, (b) inhalation, (c) oral, and (d)
parenteral.  Within a species and from species to species,
these four routes of administration greatly influence the
toxicity exhibited.  If not taken into careful consider-
ation, they can introduce variation into the testing.

BIOSTATISTICS IN TOXICOLOGICAL TESTING

Introduction

Toxicological studies should be well-designed to assure the
collection of unbiased and precise data which are tech-
nically defensible and amenable to biostatistical evalu-
ation.  Some of the basic concepts and techniques of
sampling design and data evaluation by biostatistical
methods are discussed in the following paragraphs.

Randomization

In toxicity testing, the experimental animals must be
selected with known probability.  As mentioned previously
in "Variations in Experimental Design,"" the manner in
which a random sample is obtained can introduce a great
                             17

-------
 deal  of  variation  into the experiment.  The careful use
 of  random  selection  is the only feasible technique by
 which to satisfy the "known probability" criterion.
 For example, knowing the probability of selecting an ex-
 perimental animal  makes it possible to extrapolate from
 the sample to  the  population in an objective way.

 It  becomes obvious that there is a fundamental distinction
 between  a  "haphazardly-selected" experimental animal and
 a "randomly-selected" animal.  The distinction can be
 made  that a  "haphazardly-selected" animal is one chosen
 with  no  conscious  bias, whereas a "randomly selected"
 animal is one  chosen when there is consciously no bias
 (the  rationale being that there is consciously no bias
 since the randomization is planned, and therefore bias is
 planned  out of the selection).

 Sample Size

 In  any toxicological  study, the number of animals to be
 exposed  and the number of animals to be employed as con-
 trols should be decided early.  Sample size is important
 since frequently too many animals are used which is
 wasteful, or not enough experimental animals are used
 which results  in invalid data.  There are two biostatistical
 techniques which can be employed to ensure adequate random
 sample size:   estimation of a binominal proportion and
 estimation of  a population mean for measurement data.

 The Normal Distribution

 Due to unavoidable error in the measurement process, all
 measurements in toxicity testing are uncertain to some
 extent.  There is, of course, only one correct measurement,
 which researchers  can only attempt to estimate by one
 mere  measurement or  by the mean of a number of measure-
ments.   If measurements of some treatments are repeatedly
 redone in a specific test, it is found that most outcomes
 tend  to  cluster about a central value while a few deviate.
 A frequency distribution of the results forms  a somewhat
 irregular histogram with the density of measurements being
 greatest in the center and diminishing to the right and
 left.  It has been observed that the accumulation of more
data  tends to make the histogram appear less irregular.
 This  type of measurement distribution is approaching a
mathematically defined bell-shaped curve known as the
Gaussian curve of error, or simply the normal distribution.

 The mean is a biostatistical technique that locates the
center of distribution of the x-axis of measurement.
                             18

-------
In other words, it is the long-run, arithmetical average
of all x-values.

The statistical variance is useful in describing the amount
of data variability or data dispersion which, in turn,
determines the distribution curve's breath.  Variance is
the expected value of the squared deviation of a measure-
ment from the mean, or simply the long-run arithmetical
average of all such squared deviations.

The square root of the variance is known as the standard
deviation.  The standard deviation is the distance measured
along the x-axis, from the center (mean) to the point of
inflection of the curve which is the steepest point.

Tests of Hypotheses

In toxicity testing, frequently some aspect of the study
is directed to answering a hypothetical question regarding
a population.  If the hypothesis is quantifiable, then the
hypothesis can be tested statistically by either the T-test,
Chi-Square Test, or the F-test.

The T-test can be used to compare a sample statistic
(i.e., the mean) from a toxicity experiment with some value
for the purpose of making a judgment regarding the popu-
lation as indicated by the sample data.

If there are more than two alternative categories of
response known or assumed, the sample methods developed
for binomial populations no longer serve.  A useful tool
that can be applied to various problems involving enumer-
ation data, without regard to sample size, is the Chi-
Square Test.

In biostatistics the F-test is used for testing the
equality of variance.  The computation of the F-values
involves the ratio of two variances, each with associated
degrees of random.

Linear Regression and Correlation

In various toxicity testing it is often desirable to
investigate relationships between different variables,
i.e., rate of weight loss in a t^st animal and the concen-
tration of toxin in blood serum, or mortality of test
animals per unit of time and the concentration of poly-
chlorinated biphenyls in the test animals brain, etc.
Toxicologists appreciate the complexity of actual world
                             19

-------
 relationships between variables and those mentioned
 above; however, toxicologists may also wish to investigate
 further  approximating these relationships with a straight
 line.

 Such an  approximation may prove invaluable if used
 judiciously  in toxicity testing within the limits of the
 conditions where the relation holds.  It is important to
 recognize that regardless of how well the straight line
 describes the data, a casual relationship between the
 variables is never implied.  Causality is much more dif-
 ficult to establish than mere description by a statistical
 relation.

 When studying the relationship between two variables, the
 data may be taken in one of two ways.  One way is to
 measure  two variables, e.g., measure body weight and as-
 sociated blood serum measurements.  Where two variables
 are measured, the data are termed bivariate.  The al-
 ternate  way is to choose the level of one variable and
 measure  the associated magnitude of the other variable.

 Straight line equations may be obtained for each of these
 situations by the technique of linear regression analysis,
 and if the object is to predict one variable from the
 other, it is desirable to obtain such a relation.  When
 the degree of (linear) association is to be examined, no
 straight line need be derived - only a measure of the
 strength of the relationship.  This measure is the cor-
 relation coefficient, and the analysis is termed correlation
 analysis.

 Thus, linear regression analysis and linear correlation
 analysis are two ways in which linear relationships
 between  two variables may be examined.

 By judiciously employing the biostatistical techniques
described above, the conclusions drawn from toxicity
 testing  can be made much more valid.  It must be remembered
 that all biostatistical methods are based on an abstrac-
tion (math model)  which is an approximation of some
actual world phenomenon.  If the approximation is reliable,
researchers have a useful tool; if the approximation is
unreliable, researchers can easily draw erroneous
conclusions.
                            20

-------
                        SECTION IV

                    ANIMAL SUITABILITY
INTRODUCTION

After determining the suitability of animals or animal
groups for use in toxicological testing,  species have been
recommended in this section as good potential test subjects.
The basic criteria for these recommendations are:  (a) the
availability of the species; (b)  the ability of the species
to breed under captive conditions; (c)  the ease with which
it can be maintained; (d)  the previous  use of the animal in
toxicological testing; and (e)  the degree to which a
species is representative of the group.  Most of the species
considered are wild native North American forms.  Exotic
or domestic animals were substituted only if suitable
organisms for a specific group could not  be found (see
Section III - Wild Species Versus Domestic/Lab Species for
further discussion).

Establishment of Animal Groupings

The animal groupings reflect natural, taxoncmic associa-
tions.  Certain mammalian taxa were divided or aggregated
because of different or similar food habits, or because of
size and/or habitat preference.  Invertebrates have been
aggregated on the basis of phylogeriy due  to the paucity of
research information.

Sample species for each group were used wherever possible
and are meant as general guides to the  group.  In all
cases, the text refers to North American  members of the
animal groups unless otherwise specified  and it should be
noted that the stated requirements may diffar widely from
those of non-temperate species.  Indeed,  animals of the
same species from different latitudes can require different
maintenance methods.

A format consisting of 12 major categories has been estab-
lished for the discussion of the animal groups.  Where no
information was available in a category for a specific group,
that section was omitted from the presentation.  Previous
research is briefly presented under the category of Toxi-
city Testing.  The large amount of information accumulated
makes it difficult to describe each study in detail, but
they may be located for further information via the list of
references.
                           21

-------
An effort was made to identify the specific qualities of a
species that make it particularly suited for a certain type
of test or procedure.  The inclusion of information on
habitat preference and ecological roles enables the reader
to further evaluate the suitability of an animal for a given
test or methodology.

Animal Suitability Tables

The suitability of each animal subgroup for use in toxico-
logical testing is described in a table found in each major
animal group section.  These tables synopsize the char-
acteristics of the animal group discussed in the text, with
central consideration afforded the recommended test species
in each group.  The final section of this chapter sum-
marizes pertinent information on each suggested form and
contains a final list of the most suitable species for
testing from each group (general use of the suggested
species is further discussed in Section V, Suggested
Methods).
                            22

-------
INVERTEBRATES

Invertebrates, a very large group, include all animals that
do not possess a backbone, from the tiniest single-celled
creature to highly developed forms like squids, snails,
insects, and crustaceans.  Despite their enormous variety
and number, invertebrates have been scientifically studied
far less than vertebrates, partly because they are not as
conspicuous as vertebrates or as directly important to man,
and because they are considered by many to be "lower" forms
of life.  Information is available for relatively few species
and these are largely pests and otherwise economically
important species.

By far the largest group of invertebrates both in numbers
of individuals and species is the insects.  Insects belong
to the phylum Arthropoda and possess jointed appendages and
an exoskeleton.  They are one of the three animal groups
that have attained true flight, a characteristic which sepa-
rates them from other Arthropods.  Three pair of walking
legs, compound eyes, tracheal respiration and metamorphosis
also characterize insects.

The information on insects is very heavily skewed in favor
of pest species and honeybees, because both groups are of
major importance in agriculture.  The seemingly unimportant
species have largely been neglected, but research on these
will increase as more importance is attached to evaluating
and assessing the effects of chemicals on whole ecosystems.

Invertebrates can be rewarding as well as difficult test
organisms.  Their life cycles are complex, often involving
many distinctive, morphologically different stages which
can cause the researcher some difficult maintenance and
rearing problems.  The limited knowledge of this group
hinders research, and the generally small size of its
members restricts testing methods.  On the other hand, they
are important members of the world ecosystem as basic
sources of food for many animal species.  Furthermore, most
are very instinctual and therefore routine and stereotyped
in their behavior so that differences or alterations in
behavioral norms can be easily measured.  In statistical
studies, their characteristics make them potentially good
test organisms.  Finally, the group offers the researcher
a vast array of ecological roles.  The greatest amount of
research to-date is concentrated in genetics   (Drosophila)
and bioassays,  (Musca).
                            23

-------
General criteria for selection of a test species include
the position of the species in the food chain, its availa-
bility, breedability in captivity, ease of maintenance and
previous use in toxicity testing.  These criteria are sum-
marized for each invertebrate species investigated in
Table 1.
                             24

-------
             TABLE  J.   SUITABILITY OF  INVERTEBRATES FOR TOXI COLOR 1CAt



INVERTEBRATES

Helminths

Molluscs

Arthropods
Arachnxds


Insecta
Orthoptera
Hemiptera
Homoptera

Coleoptera

Lepidoptera
Diptera

Bymenoptera


Misc.
Arthropods
^

•H
Availabi:

G

G

G




G

G

E

G
E

E


G

>i -U
4J -H
•H >
Breedabi:
in Capt:

G

G

P




G

G

E

G
E

E


F

Q) fl> 01
o 10 tr c
CDC 0
id -H -H
C M 4J *»
>w QJ 3d U
O 4-) O 0) -H
C -H M U
w id v c n
H S Ł "* «

E F

G P

G P No
previous
breeding
work

G G

E F

E G

E G
E E

E G


G F

>i

•H •-*
r-l Id
-rf U
*f\ -H
id id en
U 4J O O
OJ -H .-» rH
C 3 O O
o to u ^
U W

G E

G D
Ł.
F B2




G B- f D-

G D2

E B2,D2

G D,
E D2

E D2

E,
G B2



u
c
Habitat
Prefere
Fo
Gr
Fo
Gr
FO
Gr



Fo
Gr
Fo
Gr
Fo
Gr
Fo
Gr
Fo
Do
Fo
Gr
Do
Fo
Gr



•o
o in
4J CJ
W -H
a> o
tr 'Btri3

Helix naj^erso
Milax sp.
4ra^eus ^-aJ^.tMo




Gryllue penneylvanious
praying mantids
B lie eus leujci ~er^s
leafhoppers
Tribolium sp .
Tenebrio sp .
CQrpocapea per- 'veils
Aprotis ypsilci
Musca domestica
Drceophila me^ .i'io paste

Apis mel-ifera

Isopods
Centipedes

Legend:
General Ecological Role

A - Large carnivore
B - Small carnivore
     1.  General
     2.  Insectivore
C - Omnivore
D - Herbivore
     1.  Seed, fruit eater
     2.  Grass,  foliage eater
E - Decomposers
Habitat Preference
Fo
Gr
De
Aq
Do
Forest
Grassland
Desert
Aquatic
Domestic
E = Excellent
G = Good
F = Fair
P = Poor
Sources:   - literature cited in text

           - interviews of Scientists
                                          25

-------
 Helminths

 Introduction -

 This invertebrate group is comprised  of  several  phyla,  the
 number depending upon the classification scheme  used.   Gen-
 erally, the flatworms (Platyhelminthes), round worms
 (Aschelminthes), segmented worms  (Annelida),  and a  few  other
 smaller groups (e.g., Onychophora), are  recognized  as the
 major divisions  (24).

 Worms are distributed throughout  the  world and occupy many
 types of ecological niches.  Earthworms  (class Oligochaeta)
 are  fossorial, and ingest organic materials found in the
 soil.   There are also a great number  of  parasitic worms
 ranging from the externally attaching, blood  sucking leeches
 (class Hirudinea) to  the basically internal,  often  highly
 specialized groups  (classes Trematoda, Cestoda,  and Nema-
 toda).   Whether  this  last group can be classed as terres-
 trial  is questionable.   However,  they do infect  terrestrial
 organisms to a great  extent.  Because of bhe  small  amount
 of data available on  worms in toxicological testing and
 the  large extent of the group, most will be treated in
 this section in  a general manner.

 The  only worms used to  any extent in  toxicity testing are
 members of  the Oligochaeta because of their close associa-
 tion with soils.  Most  of the following  comments pertain
 to earthworms.

 Caging/Lab  Conditions -

 The  common  earthworm  species, Lumbricus  terrestris  (family
 Lumbricidae), is  widely  used in zoology  courses and in re-
 search.   They are readily available in large  quantities
 from biological  supply houses or from bait dealers.  How-
 ever,  if  greater  quality control is desired,  earthworms can be
 easily  reared.  Three general methods are used:  small box
 cultures  that are handled easily; large  containers; and
open fields.  Any size container will do, but for frequent
 inspection  or sorting, a depth of more than six inches is
not desirable.  Containers  should have drainage holes
covered with screen.  The bottom should  be layered  with
one-half  inch of gravel  and, if kept  outdoors, covers
should be provided (25,26).  Temperatures of  50°F to 75°F
 (depending on the species)  should be maintained  (25).
                             26

-------
Nutrition -

Culturing media should be a combination of  organic  matter
and soil.  Any combination of peat moss, manure,  leaf  mold,
sod, decaying sawdust, straw, hay and leaves and  one-third
soil of high organic content will be a sufficient substrate
for most earthworms.  Other foods, like table scraps,  chick
starter, or cornmeal should be added periodically.   About
40 g of dried food for 300 worms is a sufficient  food  addi-
tion at any one time  (26).  The substrate must always  be
moist, but not wet  (25) with an approximate pH of 7 (26).

Breeding/Rearing -

If provisions are made for adequate space,  temperature
(about 50°F for L._ terrestris, higher for some other species) ,
and moisture, earthworms will reproduce successfully in a
loose substrate of one-part dung, three parts soil, and five
parts peat moss (26).  Though earthworms are hermaphroditic,
an exchange of sperm takes place during conjugation.  The
fertilized eggs are deposited in the soil in small  pea-sized
cocoons.

Special Needs -

Moisture and moderate  temperatures are necessary.  In
nature, worms will burrow until the desired conditions are
found.  Since this may be impossible in small containers,
care should be taken to keep their environment satisfactory.

Ecological Role -

Earthworms occur in upper soil levels and feed on decaying
organic matter.  They  are particularly important as soil
mixers, aerators and drainers and serve ab food for many
insectivores  (robins,  woodcock, mice, shrews).

Problems with Mass  Culture -

A bin 4x8x2 feet will support 50,000 worms, so crowding
is  seldom a problem when sufficient moisture and food are
available  (25).

Toxicity Testing -

Tissue residues in  earthworms have been monitored  extensively
in  areas where toxic  substances have  entered the soil  (27,
28).  The effect of chemicals on  earthworm population
levels is of great  concern and has been investigated under
                             27

-------
various conditions (29, 30, 31, 32), including in the open
field  (33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39).  The U. S. Fish and
Wildlife Service has published a thorough review of the ef-
fects of chemicals on earthworms (see Reference 40).

General Suitability -

Worms occupy a variety of ecological niches and occur
throughout North America.  Their diversity, wide distribu-
tion, and importance as a food source for many vertebrate
species make them desirable test species.  Earthworms are
particularly valuable because of their role in soil eco-
systems, their past use and ease of maintenance.

Ecological Alternatives -

Isopods, snails.
                            28

-------
Molluscsa

Introduction -

Molluscs are mainly shelled invertebrates and most are aqua-
tic; however, the pulmonate snails (class Gastropoda) are
common terrestrial forms with a modified mantle for air
breathing.  Certain slugs are also terrestrial and cause
crop damage in some sections of the U. S.

Cepaea nemoralis, a snail, Testacella sp. (carnivorous) and
Milax sp., both slugs, have been successfully used in lab
research (41).  Helix aspersa, a nocturnal pulmonate snail
found throughout temperate areas of the world, has been suc-
cessfully bred and reared in captivity since the life cycles
of snails and slugs are similar, the comments in this sec-
tion, which are primarily concerned with Helix aspersa, can
be applied to many other species.

Caging/Lab Conditions -

Colonies of Helix aspersa have been kept in 55 x 40 x
28 cm wooden boxes with a 5 cm layer of damp soil.  The
boxes were covered with aluminum screen.  Room temperature
 (avg. 23°C) is suggested  (42).  C. nemoralis has been bred
in 20 cm flower pots two-thirds filled with soil.  Testa-
cella sp. has been bred in corked glass tubes and fed on
earthworms.  Milax sp. seems*to reproduce better under
conditions of varying temperature  (41).

Nutrition -

Snails in captivity thrive on lettuce and other fresh vege-
tables  (43).  Slugs will very probably do equally well on
similar foods.  Carnivorous slugs do well or. a diet of
earthworms (41).

Breeding/Rearing -

Helix aspersa has been successfully bred and reared  in quart
fruit jars containing 5 cm of damp soil  (43).  The best re-
sults occur when only two individuals are housed in  each
jar  (43).  Copulation is extended  (the average per pair of
62 pairs was recorded as 6.25 hours) compared with that of
other animals.  The eggs, which'are white and about  3mm in
diameter, are oviposited in nests prepared in the soil.  In
one study, the average number of eggs deposited was  53, of
which, on the average, 10 hatched.  Sexual maturity  occurred
within four months after birth  (43).~ The photoperiod af-
fects egg-laying  (45).
                            29

-------
 Special Needs  -

 Constant moisture and suitable temperatures are required
 for  snails to  remain active  (43).  If sufficient moisture
 is not present, snails will withdraw into their shells and
 excrete a seal over the opening.

 Ecological Role -

 Terrestrial snails and slugs are primary consumers and eat
 a varied diet  of plant materials.  They are a food source
 for  larger insectivores.

 Longevity -

 The  average lifespan of snails and slugs is unknown.

 Toxicity Testing -

 Helix sp. have been subjects in drug testing  (46, 47, 48,
 49)and in open field pesticide studies where general popu-
 lation fluctuations were measured  (50).  Learning behavior
 in Helix is described in reference 42.

 General Suitability -

 Helix sp. is a very widely distributed snail and abundant
 in certain moist habitats.  In terms of rearing, abundance,
 and  present use, it may be the only suitable terrestrial
mollusc for use in toxicity testing.  However, other pul-
monate snails  and slugs, with the exception of the carni-
vores , may prove to be equally suitable after preliminary
maintenance procedures are worked out.

Ecological Alternatives -

Earthworms, some herbivorous insects.
                             30

-------
Arachnida

Introduction -

Spiders, mites and ticks belong to the class Arachnida in
the phylum Arthropoda.  Members of this class are pri-
marily terrestrial and possess two main body segments.  The
spiders, mites and ticks have four pairs of legs on the
cephalothorax and no abdominal appendages.   They have com-
pound eyes but lack antennae.  Many Arachnids have poison
glands and some spiders and ticks are able to produce silk
from special glands in the abdomen.  Other members of this
class are scorpions and harvestmen.

Caging/Lab Conditions -

These invertebrates can be very easily maintained in almost
any container from individual glass tubes to covered ter-
raria and fruit jars.  Mites and ticks are parasitic and
can be kept with their host in its enclosure.  However,
the life cycles of ticks vary, some requiring only one
host and some up to three different host species, with
maintenance conditions changing accordingly.  Boophilus
sp. and Dermacentor sp. are examples of some species that
have been used in the laboratory  ( 51 ).

Spiders are also relatively easy to keep in the laboratory.
Dr. Peter N. Witt and his colleagues from the North Caro-
lina Department of Mental Health have very successfully
used web patterns in orb-weaver spiders to test the effects
of drugs.  Araneus diadematus is their best subject.
(see Toxicity Testing for -details).  Special 50 x 50
10 cm aluminum enclosures  (See Figure 1) with removable
glass windows and provision for air circulation were con-
structed for web-spinning.  To encourage nightly spinning,
a photoperiod of 13L:11D has been used.  A temperature
change  (colder at night) is also important  (52) .

Nutrition

The feeding of mites and ticks often requires a host.  All
their nutritional requirements are met by the blood meals
they extract  (51).  Spiders are fed flies and mealworms.
They require water, which  can be provided by spraying a
ball of cotton placed in the cage or, in lab reared in-
dividuals, administered by a syringe placed up to the
animal's mouth  (53).
                           31

-------
 Figure 1.  Web building enclosure
            Raleigh, NC
Source:  (52,53)
                 32

-------
Breeding/Rearing -

Breeding mites and ticks is simple when the appropriate
host is provided.  The instar stages vary in number and
length, but if their natural host is available,  a con-
tinuous supply of organisms can be produced.  Female ticks
usually fall from the host after engorgement and mating to
lay their eggs, necessitating some method of collection
and housing (such as glass vials) ( 51 ).  Success at
breeding spiders in captivity has been minimal,  probably
due to the lack of effort.  Most supplies of spiders are
acquired by gathering cocoons in the fall and hatching
the young in the lab  (53).

Special Needs -

The special needs of parasitic mites and ticks have been
described above under Caging/Lab Conditions.  Spiders need
a cold-dark, warm-light rhythm in order to build webs
nightly.  Water should also be given frequently ( 53 ) .

Ecological Role -

Mites and ticks are parasitic on plants and animals, de-
riving their sustenance directly from the fluids of their
hosts.  Spiders are carnivorous invertebrates whose food
consists entirely of small animals, primarily insects.
All Arachnids are potential food sources for insectivores.

Longevity -

The lifespan of mites and ticks are relatively unknown.
Spiders of the genus Araneus can live up to 18 months
( 53 ) and Tarantula and wolf spider life spans are measur-
able in terms of years.

Problems with Mass Culture -

Spiders need more research on breeding before they can be
mass-bred under controlled conditions.

Toxicity Testing -

Because certain mites are serious crop pests, a significant
amount of toxicological research has been conducted using
these mites as test species  ( 54, 55, 56  )•  Spiders have
been used in drug testing to some extent.  Since some
groups build very uniform webs, the researcher has a very
                             33

-------
discriminating parameter for measuring drug effects.  The
application of this technique to the testing of toxic
substances seems rather simple  ( 53 ) .

General Suitability -

Mites and ticks are easily maintained under controlled
conditions and because many derive their substenance from
the fluids of their hosts, they might be used in a variety
of ways to monitor the host.

Spiders are excellent test subjects because they are preda-
tors on many insects, they are relatively easy to maintain,
if not to breed, and their web-building provides a very
useful experiment tool.  Araneus diadematus has been a
most successful web-weaver and quite common in the Eastern
U.S.  Mr. Leonard Pankhurst, 204 Stroud Street, Canastota,
New York, 13032, supplies this species in limited
quantities (52).

Ecological Alternatives -

For spiders, centipedes.
                            34

-------
Orthoptera


Introduction -

This order includes many large and well-known insects:
crickets, grasshoppers, roaches, locusts,  and praying
mantids.  Most are plant feeders and can be very de-
structive to man's crops.  A few species are predacious
( 57 ).  The Orthopterans usually have wings (two pair)
and their mouthparts are of the chewing type.  Auditory
stimuli are important for intraspecific communication and
oval eardrums, or tympana, are the receptor organs.
Stridulations (the songs) are the results  of rubbing cer-
tain body-parts together (e.g., hind femora and wing).

Most past toxicological  research has been done on wide-
ranging and easily obtainable species, the common cockroach
(Periplaneta americana), the field cricket  (Gryllius
pennsylvanicus),the locusts  (Schistocera gregaria and
Locusta migratoria), and the Mantids(Mantis sp., Stagmo-
mantis sp., Tenodera sp.).

Caging/Lab Conditions -

Crickets, G. pennsylvanicus, have been housed in a great
variety of containers.   Successful breeding has occurred in
cages with a moist sand  substrate to facilitate oviposition.
Stock cages 42 x 18 x 18 inches made of aluminum screen
will house 250 adults.   Five hundred nymphs can be reared
together in an 11 x 7 x  8 inch glass aquarium.  A 16-
hour photoperiod at a temperature of about  24°C and a  rela-
tive humidity of 60 to  65 percent are appropriate conditions
for rearing crickets  (58).

Roach colonies have been kept in larvae cages 40 cm high by
20 cm in diameter with  plastic sides, metal bases and  per-
forated lids.  The ten  hardboard platforms  provided added
surface area and relative seclusion  for the roaches.   A 70
percent relative humidity and a temperature of  27.5°C  were
maintained for the colonies.  Any enclosure with layered
surfaces to increase the area should be adequate for roach
maintenance  (59).

Locusts and grasshoppers have been housed in many types of
enclosures.  Electric lights of 25 watts are suggested as a
heat source  (60).
                            35

-------
Praying mantids can be kept at 75° to 88 °F and at a rela-
tive humidity of 50 to 70 percent, but after the fifth molt
they become cannabalistic and should be separated  (61).

Nutrition  -

The main diet of crickets in one lab consists of a mixture
of biscuit meal, dried milk, Bemax and dried yeast in a
ratio of 50:5:40:5..  Fresh greens are provided about once a
week.  A constant supply of water is required  (62).

Cockroach  diets can have many components.  Table scraps,
dog food,  and rat food are suggested.  Water should be
constantly available  (59).

Fresh grass and dry wheat bran are the components of one
diet for locusts.  Water is necessary at all times  (60).

Praying mantids will eat almost any living insect of an
appropriate size (61).

Breeding/Rearing -  •

Some crickets breed all year long, while others have but
one generation per year  ( 58 ).  For all types, moist sand
should be  provided for oviposition and the eggs removed
to petri dishes for hatching.  Incubation takes 15 days
at 24°C but hatchina can only take place after a three
month diapause period at 4 C  ( 62 ).

Cockroaches oviposit their eggs in dried food mixtures,
from which they can be removed with a sieve and incubated
at a relative humidity of 70 per cent  ( 59 ).

In the lab, locusts lay eggs in moist well-packed sand.
The pods can be removed and incubated at 32°C and will
hatch in 11 to 25 days, depending on the species  (60).

All Orthopterans have simple metamorphosis:  the nymphs
hatch from the egg as miniature adults except for the
wings and  achieve adulthood by periodic molts.

Special Needs -

Most insects need high humidity and a constant supply of
water.
                            36

-------
Ecological Role -

Crickets and roaches are omnivorous insects and will feed
on many kinds of organic matter.   Locusts and grasshoppers
are vegetarians and can occur in very large numbers, some-
times defoliating the countryside.  Praying mantids are
predators and feed primarily on insects.   All of these
species are possible food items for insectivorous inverte-
brates and vertebrates.

Longevity -

Few representatives of this order live longer than one
season as adults.

Problems with Mass Culture -

Adult praying mantids cannot be housed together for they
tend strongly toward cannabalism.

Toxicity Testing -

Cockroaches are extensively used in toxicity testing in a
great number of ways, e.g., effects of pesticides on enzymes
(63, 64, 65} and the nervous system (66).  Orthopterans
have been used in studies of metabolic reactions (67, 68,
69, 70) and in open field studies  (71).

General Suitability -

The insects in this order are easily maintained and very
abundant.  Roaches, grasshoppers,  crickets and praying man-
tids are available commercially  from suppliers.  Praying
mantids, being strictly  carnivorous and relying heavily
on insects  for food, might accumulate  certain chemicals or
be more heavily  exposed  to target  animals.   This ecological
role might make  them especially  interesting  test subjects.

Ecological Alternatives  -

For crickets,  leaf hoppers.  For praying mantids,  carni-
vorous beetles.
                             37,

-------
 Hemiptera-Homoptera

 Introduction -

 Hemipterans  are true bugs.  Their upper half-wings, or
 hemelytra, are proximally tough and leathery, and distally
 membranous.   Their  mouth parts are the sucking-piercing
 type,  enabling them to extract vital juices from plants
 and  animals  (  57  ).  The Homoptera are closely associated
 with the bugs  and share many characteristics with them.
 A distinct difference is implied in their name:  both pairs
 of wings are similar and entirely membranous.  However,
 some members of this group are wingless.  All Homopterans
 are  plant feeders (57).  Both orders undergo simple meta-
 morphis.

 Caging/Lab Conditions -

 There are no special requirements for rearing most of the
 common species of Hemiptera and Homoptera, though the
 life cycles  of some groups may present difficulties
 (e.g.,  cicadas).  Milkweed bugs  (Oncopeltus fasciatus) can
 be reared in small  glass tubes.

 Nutrition -

 In natural situations all of these insects utilize the
 fluids  of many kinds of plants and animals.

 Ecological Role -

 Hemipterans  and Homopterans are feeders on organic fluids,
 primarily plant juices.  They can be destructive agri-
 cultural pests.   These insect groups are food for
 insectivorous  invertebrates and vertebrates.

 Longevity -

 It is  doubtful that' most adult Hemipterans and Homopterans
 will live longer  than one year.  Cicada larvae however,
 care long-lived and could -provide a unique means for toxi-
 city in soil ecosystems.

 Toxicity Testing  -

 Chinch  bugs.(Blissus) are serious pests of cereal crops.
 The  effects  of chemical control measures on their numbers
 have been studied ( 72 ).  Assassin bugs (Triatoma) are
.blood-sucking  insects which transmit a Trypanosome known
 as Chagas disease in South America.  The effects of chemi-
 cals on this species have also been studied ( 73, 74 ).
                            38

-------
Aphids or plantlice are a large group of Homoperans and fre-
quent pests on vegetation.  Toxicity testing with aphids have
been concerned with their control (75, 76).

General Suitability -

The herbivorous aphid species are good selections for use
in studies of environmental contaminants that may accumulate
or deposit on vegetation.

Ecological Alternatives -

For aphids , herbivorous invertebrates.
                             39

-------
 Coleoptera

 Introduction -

 About 40  percent of  all  known  insects  are  beetles.  They
 comprise  the largest order of  animals/ with well  over
 25,000 species in the U.S.  alone.  The sizes, habits, and
 ecological niches of beetles vary  greatly.   Some  are  phyto-
 phagus, some predacious,  some  scavengers,  some  saprophagus,
 and others parasitic on  plants and animals,  Beetles  are
 found almost everywhere  in freshwaters and on land  (  57 ).
 The Coleopterous (sheath-wing)  insects have four  wings,
 the top pair a thick,  hard set (elytra) to protect  the
 membranous under set.  Mouthparts  are  basically of  the
 chewing type though  some  are modified  for  sucking.
 Metamorphosis is complete.  The life cycles vary  con-
 siderably within the group (57).

 Beetles that have been used in research are frequently
 pest species,  though not  exclusively.   Included are ground
 beetles,  [Harpalus,  Agonum ( 77),  Feronia  (  39)], lady
 beetles,  [Hippodamia,  Coleomegi1la ( 7 8 , ~7 9 )]  and  flour
 beetles,  [Tribolium  (  80)]. Mealworms,  Tenebrio sp. are
 commonly  reared as food  for insectivorous  animals ( 81 ).

 Caging/Lab Conditions  -

 Depending on their size and habits, beetles  are relatively
 easy to maintain under controlled  conditions.   The  proper
 temperature,  25° to  30 °C,  and  humidity, 50  to 65  percent,
 are essential  to all insects.   Insect  breeding  may  depend
 on  the photoperiod.  A list of species bred in  Great  Brit-
 ain,  their nutrition and  temperature requirements is
 found in  reference 81.

 Nutrition -

 The food  habits of beetles  are so  varied that a general
 statement about them would  be  useless.  A  close matching
 of  natural foods has been the  general  system in animal
 maintenance and sould  be acceptable for beetles.  For a
 large  number of pest species,  artificial diets  have been
 determined and a keyed list of them  can be found  in
 reference 81.

 Breeding/Rearing -

Many species are easily bred in captivity, given the proper
medium e.g., grain weevils  (Sitophilus) on cereal grains,
                            40

-------
or mustard beetles (Phaedon)  on potted cabbage,  turnips
or radish plants.  Tenebrio sp. can be bred year round
with great ease  ( 81 ).

Ecological Role -

Some beetles are pests on agricultural crops and other
are predacious ground dwelling species (e.g., Harpalus)
( 82).  Others feed on fungi and carrion.  All beetles
are potential food for insectivorous invertebrates and
vertebrates.

Longevity -

Like most other  insects, the generation time of beetles
is seldom longer than a year and it is unusual when adults
live for more than one year.

Toxicity Testing -

Insects are the  primary pests which afflict man and his
domestic stock and crops/ and millions of dollars are  spent
yearly for insect control.  By far, the majority of toxi-
city testing using beetles has been concerned with pest
species.  Pesticide residues in many species have been
studies including Popillia,  (83, 84, 85 );   Tribolium
(80 ); ground beetles ( 36, 39, 77, 82 );   and lady
beetles  ( 78, 79 ).  Large numbers of toxic chemicals
have been tested on beetles  (78 ).

General Suitability -

Beetles are an ecologically diverse group which generally
appears to be attractive for use in toxicity testing.

Ecological Alternatives^ -

For ground beetles, centipedes.  For  scarab beetles,
millipedes.  For plant  eaters, Hemiptera and slugs.
                            41

-------
Lepidoptera

Introduction -

Butterflies and moths are conspicuous and well-known in-
sects, among which are some of the most beautiful animals
we know.  However, the adults that please the eye are often
metamorphosed from destructive phytophagus larvae that are
major insect pests of cultivated plants.  The adult mouth
parts are the sucking type and metamorphosis is complete in
the species of this order.  The larval forms can produce
silk for cocoons and shelter (57).

Many Lepidopterans have been reared under lab conditions.
Three general methods - two for pest species and one for
nocturnal moths  (the largest family of Lepidoptera) will be
discussed.

Nutrition -

Some Lepidopteran larvae are general feeders and others are
very specific, feeding on one plant species exclusively.
Lab diets must reflect these natural habits and require-
ments.

Breeding/Rearing -

The black cutworm (Agrotis ypsilon) has been difficult to
rear due to cannabalism, but because of its economic impor-
tance, a method has been found by some Canadian researchers.
Pupae are obtained from nature and after emergence the adults
are held in 12 x 12 x 16 inch cages with sliding glass panels
to permit air circulation.  Twenty moths per cage is the
normal capacity and ambient temperature is 80 + 2°F.  Gallon
jars with moist paper are used to supply an egg laying
environment and a light-dark photoperiod is maintained.
Pyrex trays 12 x 8 x 2 inch with 1 inch moistened sand are
provided for larvae.  At the initiation of the fifth instar,
each larva is separately placed in a small flint jar with a
1.5 inch layer of a 1:1:1 sand-sandy loam-vermiculate mix-
ture with about 6 percent moisture added (86).

The codling moth (Carpocapsa pomonella) is reared in 53.3
x 30.5 x 7.6 cm stainless steel trays with a 10 to 13 mm
layer of burrowing medium on the bottom.  To prevent con-
tamination and dehydration, a thin layer of paraffin is
sprayed over the surface with a specially designed apparatus
(87).  Larvae of Noctuid moths have been successfully reared
in the lab from eggs in 6 ounce waxed paper cups with
                            42

-------
standard cardboard lids.  A diet,  shown in Table 2,  is
placed in each cup.  The number of larvae per cup depends on
the species (88).

Adult black cutworm larvae are fed by means of dental cotton
plugs soaked in a 10 percent dextrose solution suspended
in the cages on strings.  Larvae are fed red clover  or
tobacco (86) .

Artificial diets for codling moths are based on ingredients
such as wheat germ, soybean meal,  rice flour, pinto  beans,
alfalfa meal, cottonweed meal, corn meal and carrot  powder
(87).

Noctuid larvae have been successfully reared on the  medium
described in Table 2 below.
           Table 2.  COMPOSITION OF AN ARTIFICIAL
          MEDIUM USED FOR REARING NOCTUID SPECIES
 Ingredient

 Soaked lima beans
 Soaked pinto beans
 Dried brewers'  yeast
 Ascorbic acid
 Methyl p-hydroxybenzoate
 Sorbic acid
 Formaldehyde (40%)
 Agar
 Water
Grams for 120-150 Cups

     Present Method
         2133
          320
           32
           20
           10
           20
          128
         6400
 Source:   88
                             43

-------
 Special  Needs  -

 Excessive  humidity  can  cause  fungi  and bacteria growth on
 insect growth  media and infections  of the animals them-
 selves.  On the  other hand, a lack  of moisture and the
 resulting  dehydration can also cause mortality in lab
 colonies.   A careful balance  of  temperature and humidity
 is mandatory (87,88).

 Special  diets  for the various life  stages of Lepidopterans
 may be expensive and time-consuming to prepare.

 Ecological Role  -

 The larvae of  butterflies and moths, often severe agricul-
 tural  pests, are economically much  more important than the
 adults,  some of  which never feed.   They frequently supply
 food for insectivorous  predators.

 Longevity  -

 Most Lepidopterans  have an annual cycle.  Eggs or pupae
 overwinter.  The larvae feed  voraciously and pupate.  Adults
 often  have the sole task and  ability to mate and lay eggs.

 Problems with  Mass  Culture -

 Many larval forms are cannibalistic, especially in crowded
 quarters.   Isolation may be necessary during certain instar
 stages (86,88).

 Toxicity Testing -

 Much of  the  research with butterflies and moths has been
 with pheromones  (89,90,91,92,93)  often with the goal of
 achieving  population control.  However, a few toxicity
 studies  are  available (94,95,96).

 Researchers have found  a way of closely scrutinizing the
 flight of  insects and the comparison of certain measurements
 between controls and test organisms gives a reliable, be-
havioral test  (97) .

 General Suitability  -

 Some Lepidopterous  insects can be routinely bred and reared
 in captivity and can make excellent test animals.

Ecological Alternatives  -

Other phytophagous  insects.

                            44

-------
Diptera                                                 !

Introduction -

The "flies" are a well-known group o'f insects and one of
the larger orders.  They possess only one pair of wings -
the front pair.  The hind set are reduced to balancing, knob-
like organs.  Mouth parts are sucking and metamorphosis is
complete.

Most flies are small soft-bodied insects, many of which are
economically important.  Mosquitoes, stable flies, house
flies, and blow flies are pests of man"and other animals.
Many diseases can be transmitted by Dipterans.  Many other
flies are predacious on harmful insect species, some are
important as pollinators, and still others are useful
scavengers  (57).

Most of the available maintenance procedures are concerned
with pest species and these will be reviewed.  A group of
smaller insects (family Chironomidae) has also been suc-
cessfully reared in the lab and will also be discussed be-
low with mosquito (family Culicidae) rearing techniques.

Caging/Lab Conditions -

Larger flies (i.e., Muscidae, Calliphoridae) can be kept
in any escape-proof container at a temperature of 27.5 +
1°C and relative humidity of 50 to 55 percent.  Windows are
not necessary but proper air circulation is important.
Wooden cages (45 x 45 x 45 cm) with screen sides that can
be dismantled for cleaning are used to keep adult house
flies (Musca domestica), and stable flies (Stomoxys calci-
trans) (98, 99).A minimum of 50 cm3 for each adult is a
good guide for space requirements (98).

Mosquito adults (Culex, Aedes, Anopheles) can be easily
housed in 18 x 18 x 18 inch plywood cages screened with
18 mesh screen.  In most fly cages, a muslin sleeve is
attached (24 inches long, 9 inches circular opening) to
provide access while preventing the escape of the animals.
Temperatures between 24° and 27°C and relative humidity
around 80 percent are satisfactory ambient conditions.  A
12L:12D photoperiod enables Anopheles quadrimaculatus to
carry out its normal life cycle "(100) .

Chironomids can be housed in cages similar to those of mos-
quitoes, but because they may need ample space to swarm in
order to reproduce, larger enclosures (5.25 x 4.5 x 7 feet)
                            45

-------
must be provided with a 75 gallon aquarium filled with mud
for the floor  (see Breeding/Rearing for further discussion).
Chironomus plumosus will breed under such conditions with an
ambient temperature of about 25°C and a relative humidity of
70 percent (101).

Fruitflies (Drosophila), can be easily raised in the lab in
many sizes of cages and are widely used in many types of
research  (102).

Nutrition -

Adult houseflies and blowflies are provided with a shallow
dish of sugar for feeding.  Stable flies are fed blood
offered in soaked cotton, the live host, or in dishes on
the floor of the cage.  Water soaked cotton pads should be
available for drinking in all fly. enclosures (98, 99, 103).

Larval houseflies and blowflies are reared on many media,
the general ingredients consisting of various combinations
of dog biscuits, fish, wheat bran, alfalfa meal, baker's
yeast, malt extract, manure, sugar, and water (98, 103).
Larval stable flies are more difficult to rear.  Stoiaoxys
cultures should be fed the diet found in reference 99.

Only small amounts should be given at one time until larval
consumption increases.  Shallow flat dishes are suitable
holding containers for larvae and medium.  A pH of above
7 is desirable  for the medium, and using only 24-hour old
medium assures  that newly hatched larvae will not encounter
acid conditions (99).

Adult mosquitoes can be maintained on soaked seedless
raisins or a 10 percent sugar solution in saturated gauze padi
Females get a blood meal via a shaved guinea pig three
times a week  (  100).  Adult female mosquitoes can also be
fed on shaved rabbits.  Larval mosquitoes are fed a diet
of wheat  flour, dry brewer's yeast, dried beef blood, and
non-fat dry milk.  The finely ground mixture is sprinkled
sparingly on the surface of the water (100).

Breeding/Rearing -

The procedure  for breeding houseflies is to transfer
adults to a cage made of gauze with a plywood bottom  (see
Caging)  (104).  Cotton-wool pads soaked with a milk-water
solution  (1:1)  provide an oviposition site.  The pads with
                             46

-------
eggs are then transferred to jars with rearing medium and
muslin caps.  About eight days after the eggs are laid,
larvae will migrate to upper layer of medium and pupate.
This layer is removed to an adult cage where emergence
takes place (98) .

Ground horse meat is the medium most often used for ovi-
position by blowflies.  Eggs remain in the meat and are
transferred to larvae medium in glass jars.  They hatch  in
24 hours.  In eight days they pupate and emergence occurs
six days later.  Sawdust is used as a sponge to soak up
excess moisture from the meat in the culture jars (103).

Oviposition cages for stable flies are of the same con-
struction as adult holding cages, but smaller in size
(25 x 25 x 25 cm).  Oviposition occurs more readily in
confined spaces.  About 6.5 days after emergence, well-fed
flies will produce the first eggs, but full production
doesn't occur until the 10th day, when the transfer of
gravid adults to Oviposition cages is suggested.  Eggs are
laid through perforations in a zinc floor and caught on the
black cloth surrounding the cage.  Flurorescent lighting
and adult food should be present.  About 60 to 70 percent
of the eggs will hatch and placed on a culture medium, will
pupate in nine to ten days.  Pupae are placed in adult
cages for emergence  (99).

Mosquitoes  (Anopheles guadrimaculatus) oviposit in 8.5 x
4.5  x 2 inch enamel dishes of aerated tap water two to
three days after a blood meal.  Eggs are transferred to
rearing pans  (9  x  15 .x 2.5 inch).  Dechlorinated water
should be used.  After hatching, larvae are  separated to
500 per pan and fed  the larval diet  (see Nutrition).  Pupae
are transferred to the holding cages for emergence.  It
should be noted that different species of mosquitoes have
different specific requirements, though the  rearing pattern
for A. quadrimaculatus is, in general, characteristic for
other species(100).

Midges  (Chironomus plumpsus) have been bred  and  reared in
the laboratory.  The Chironomid group swarm  under  specific
conditions, and successful breeding depends  on  suitable
ambient temperature  and light.  Cages are  lit by fluores-
cent and incandescent lamps and natural conditions  are simu-
lated by a gradual  increasing and diminishing of intensities.
Swarming takes place in the "evening".  Some successful
breeding has taken place in small cages  (3.0 x  1.9 ~x 1.5 cm)
 (105) .  Larvae will  develop to the fourth  ?.nstar in the  mud
substrate at the cage bottom.  Trainer1s Dog rewards are
added as food after  they are given thorough  soaking.  Pupa-
tion occurs in the  substrate and adults emerge  after nine
to 13 days  (101).

                            47

-------
Special Needs -

Diets and maintenance requirements are different for each
species.  There are many entomology laboratories throughout
the United States which can supply procedural data and
special needs for many Dipteran species.

Behaviora]^ Restrictions -

Life cycles can be very complex and difficult.  Species-
specific behavioral idiosyncrosies abound in this animal
group.  These facts can make lab breeding/rearing difficult
or at least, demand special provisions  (e.g., swarming
cages for Chironomids).

Ecological Roles -

Many adult Dipterans are vectors of disease and nuisance
pests of other animals.  However, they also can represent
staple foods for insectivorous predators (i.e., bats,
swallows, frogs).  Aquatic larvae are frequently major food
sources for fish in quiet waters.

Longevity -

It is doubtful that adult Dipterans live for more than one
year; they probably live for a much shorter period of time.

Toxicity Testing -

Dipterans have been the subjects of conditioning experi-
ments, with mixed success  (106, 107).   They have been used
in a great number of experiments with toxic substances to
determine mode of entry  (108, 109) and  general effects  (80,
110, 111).  Sublethal effects on reproduction, behavior
under stress conditions  (112) and physiology have also been
studied  (113, 114, 115).  Insect resistance to toxic sub-
stances  (116, 117, 118) and even the effects of toxic sub-
stances on Dipteran eggs have been studied  (119).
                            48

-------
General Suitability -

Many flies have been used in research and for a good number
of species the maintenance procedures are available.  This
makes them worth consideration as test species.  The double
association of some forms (e.g., mosquitoes) to aquatic and
terrestrial systems at different times during their life
cycles may make them particularly suitable subjects in ex-
periments in which land-water transfer of a substance is to
be studied.

Ecological Alternatives -

Blood sucking Hemipterans.
                           49

-------
Hymenoptera

Introduction -

The Hymenoptera  (membrane-wing) contain what man regards as
the most beneficial group in the insect kingdom, the honey-
bees.  There are also a good number of wasps that parasit-
ize other insects, many important pollinators and several
interesting social groups.  Ants, sawflies, Ichneumons,
Chalcids, wasps and bees all belong to this order.  They
have chewing and chewing-sucking mouthparts and undergo
complete metamorphosis.  Bees are the only members that
have been maintained to any extent.

Caging/Lab Conditions -

Housing of honeybee (Apis) colonies is an old and well-known
practice and there are very extensive texts available on the
subject.  Bumble bees  (Bombus) are also important as polli-
nators of legume crops and have been bred and reared in the
lab.  Wooden nest boxes contain 'two compartments:  a feeding
and a brood chamber.  Nesting material such as dried grass
or cotton is supplied, and, for feeding, a honey-and-pollen
mixture.  The queens are introduced to the nest and their
natural nesting instinct usually takes over.  Some reports
attribute success in colony establishment to the addition
of some workers to the nest with the queen.  Queens are
caught in nature and fed on pollen and honey.  After the
establishment of colonies in the lab, they have been set
outdoors to do their pollination job.  Successes have been
reported for about 30 species.  Some success at overwinter-
ing queens has also been reported  (120).

The Agricultural Research Services, USDA, Tucson, Arizona,
has utilized honey bees (Apis mellifera) in toxicity testing
under lab and field conditions.  Their lab cages are 6 x
6x2 inches with 100 bees per cage  (121).

Nutrition -

Bumblebees have been kept in the lab on honfcy and pollen
(120).  Honeybees have been maintained on 60 percent suc-
rose and pollen  (121).  The larvae require no special diet
because of the care given them by the adults.
                           50

-------
Breeding/Rearing -

Once a bee colony is established it will be self-perpetuating
for at least that season.  Honeybee colonies remain intact
over winter and may last for many years, but whether
colonies which have been kept in the lab year-round are still
able to reproduce is uncertain, because uiost have been
initiated for research outdoors.

Special Needs -

Nest boxes are. necessary for the colony.

Ecological Role -

Many Hymenoptera are important as pollinators and as
parasites on other insects.  They feed on pollen, plant
juices, and many other liquid foods.

Longevity -
                              i
The lifetime of most adult Hymenopterans can be measured
in months.

Toxicity Testing -

There have been numerous studies of the resistance of
Hymenopterans to the adverse effects of toxic substance
 (122, 123, 124, 125, 126,  127,  128).   General studies
both in the lab and field  have  also been completed  (129).

General Suitability -

The social species of  insects,  e.g., ants  and bees, appear
to be very interesting potential  subjects  because  there
already exists a considerable body of  knowledge  on  their
social organization and  population dynamics and  because
some species  are relatively  easy  to keep and simple to work
with  (121  ).   Studies  at the population level and  of  sub-
lethal effects on behavior could  easily be performed  and
the results reviewed in  the  light of known patterns.
                             51

-------
Miscellaneous Invertebrates

This section discusses a group of insects which have not
been extensively studied in the laboratory, but which may
prove to be useful subjects for toxicity testing.  Included
here are the soil arthropods and those that are closely
associated with ground and other substrates, as well as
other miscellaneous groups.  Centipedes  (Chilopoda) and
millipedes  (Diplopoda) are interesting animals and play im-
portant roles in the micro-systems in which they exist:
centipedes are predators, sucking the fluids from their prey
through their mandibles; millipedes feed mainly on dead or-
ganic matter.  Both have been used as test animals (130).

Springtails  (Collembola) are apterygote insects that loco-
mote by means of a forked structure which, extended, causes
the animal to jump.  Springtails are inhabitants of leaf
litter, decaying logs and fungi.  They are basically vege-
tarians .

Thrips (Thysanoptera) are also insects and plant feeders.
They occur on all types of vegetation and can be serious
pests of cultivated plants.

Another Arthropod group are the Isopods, or pill bugs.  They
are frequently found around decaying matter and play an im-
portant role in the decomposition of organic solids.  Iso-
pods are abundant throughout North America and because of
their saprophagous feeding habits and abundance, may prove
to be very good test animals.  They have been used previous-
ly  (131).

Scorpions  (Arachnoidea) are rapacious arthropods that occur
primarily in subtropical and desert regions of the United
States.  They nocturnally feed on insects and spiders, first
killing or immobilizing them with the sting apparatus on
the distal tip of the abdomen.  Scorpions are relatively
easy to keep.  Palamnaeus gravimanus have been kept in wood
cages 3 x 2.5 x 1 foot with a soft earth substrate for
burrowing.  Wads of wet cotton kept them moist and cock-
roaches were the staple food.  Some evidence indicates they
may be quite suitable for use in toxicity testing  (132).
                            52

-------
VERTEBRATES

Amphibians and Reptiles


Amphibians and reptiles, the herpetofauna, are poikilother-
mic vertebrates that inhabit both terrestrial and aquatic
environments of all types.  The herps are basically egg
laying animals.  Amphibians usually require water for
successful reproduction.  Reptiles on the other hand,
through evolution,have developed a land egg which can be
deposited in many types of terrestrial nests.  Some rep-
tilian species are live-bearers and do not lay eggs.

Most reptiles and amphibians are carnivorous and feed on
insects, other invertebrates, ybung birds, eggs, and small
mammals.  However, a few lizards and turtles are herbiv-
orous.

Amphibians and reptiles have been used in laboratory re-
search in a few ways that may prove applicable to toxicity
testing.  For example, amphibian eggs are excellent for
embryological studies and are often used in college courses.
In toxicological research, however, there has been very
little attention paid to the poikilothermic vertebrates
probably because of their lack of economic importance.


The following text discusses species which are judged to be
potentially suitable for toxicity testing based on their
ecological importance, availability, ease of laboratory
maintenance, and reproductive success in captivity.  Be-
cause of the paucity of information available in the liter-
ature on herpetofauna that might aid in such a selection, a
number of herpetologists were consulted for suggestions.  A
summary table indicating the suitability of herpetofauna for
toxicology testing is provided in Table 3.
                             53

-------
                            TABLE 3.  SUITABILITY - HERPf:P
HERPS


Amphibians



Turtles


Lizards


Snakes
>.
-U
•H
t-(
-H
f>
a
r-t
-H

>
A

E


G
4J
-H
>
-H

C Q.

•a o


^ -H


G


F
01
O
c
a
c

o -u
c
01 -H
10 as
as


F


G
o>
tn a>
a c
•H
tn -i*
3 01
O 01

j>

M *H
P*

F


P
w
C
o
-H
4J
O
•H

JJ
tn
Hi
K
Pure water
Housing
methods
Captive
breeding
>,
tJ
•H
i-t
-H
r-tŁ>

l-l 4J .
01 -H
c a
0) CO


G


F

iH
to
0
•H
Dl
O 01
r-J r-t
O O
o a


B2

B,
D2
(j
o
d

±> ^4
10 O

-H OJ

CO 0.
X

All

Aq
Fo


•o

-p a
tn -H
01 0
O> 0

3 Ul
CO
Rana pi:
Amb'.fs tor

Terrapen
Cheliidrj.











ens
.1 ifxi -anu".

e sp.
8 erper.ti.na
                             FofGr  AncLis earoZ inms
                             De     Phrvnosorna eornut
                    F-G
                                                                   All
                                    Tha^ncphis sirtalie
                                    Elarhe sp.
Legend:

General Ecological Role

A - Large carnivore
B - Small carnivore
     1.  General
     2.  Insectivore
C - Omnivore
D - Herbivore
     1.  Seed, fruit eater
     2.  Grass foliage eater
Habitat Preferences
Fo
Gr
De
Aq
Do
Forest
Grassland
Desert
Aquatic
Domestic
E = Excellent
G = Good
F = Fair
P = Poor
Sources:   - literature cited in text
           - interviews of Scientists

-------
Anurana

Introduction -

Amphibians are so named because they metamorphose from
aquatic forms into air-breathing and often terrestrial
tetrapods.  The aquatic forms of frogs and toads, the tad-
poles, have provided scientists with unique opportunities
to study developmental biology.

There are six families of Anurans in North America:  the
spadefoot toads, Pelobatidae, the narrow-mouthed toads,
Microhylidae, the other toads, Bufonidae, the leptodactylid
frogs, Leptodactylidae, tree frogs and their allies, Hylidae,
and the true frogs, Ranidae.  Of the true frogs, the leopard
frog  (Rana pipiens) has been utilized by researchers for
many types of investigations.  It is a very abundant and
widespread species that occurs in many kinds of waterbodies
throughout the U. S., Mexico, and Southern Canada  (133).
Many other species of toads  (Bufo) and true frogs  (Rana)
are locally abundant and also bred, reared and maintained
in labs throughout the U. S.  However, since the leopard
frog is the major subject in amphibian research, the follow-
ing text is focused primarily on this specie..

Caging/Lab Conditions -

For adult frogs, just about any waterproof enclosure with
available water is sufficient to house large numbers  (134).
Plastic tanks, large sinks  (22 "x  14 x 14  inches) for about
25 adults  (135), and plastic rat cages  (22-3/4  x 11 x
6 inches) with perforated stainless steel lids  (136) have
been suggested cages.  Adults can also be maintained for
weeks under refrigeration  (4°C) in water.  No feeding  is
necessary during this time.  The water, however, should be
changed three times weekly  (134).  Further enclosure speci-
fications and handling techniques can be  found  under Breed-
ing/Rearing.

Water for use in amphibian  cages  should be unchlorinated  and
unfluoridated, especially water in which  larval forms  are
kept  (134, 137, 138, 139, 140).

Proper temperature regimes  are quite variable for  adults,
and should depend on the state of mobility desired  and the
techniques to be performed.  Certain anesthesia doses  are
differentially effective at different temperatures  (141).
For active adult animals, 18°  to  20° C  is suggested (134).
                             55

-------
Larval anurans are affected in their sexual development by
ambient water temperatures.  For normal results, a 15° to
25°C range is sufficient (134) .

The Mexican axolotl, Ambystoma mexicanum, have been main-
tained in the laboratory in containers made of asbestos
cement at the time they reach 5 mm, for caging specifications
see reference 142.  Water in the salamander containers
should be unchlorinated and circulated constantly (142).

Work in the Amphibian Facility at the University of Michi-
gan, Ann Arbor, is proving the feasibility of mass producing
Rana pipiens as well as other amphibian species (137).

Nutrition -

Cooked lettuce and various other greens have been most often
used as food for tadpoles  (137, 138) , but one nutritional
study showed a 300 percent weight, increase at seven weeks in
larvae fed Purina No. 1 trout chow over those fed just let-
tuce (143).  Natural pond plankton and bits of liver have
a.lso been successfully used to rear tadpoles (148) .  Spinach,
however, has been shown to cause kidney stones in some
amphibians (144) and is not recommended (137).

For recently metamorphosed frogs, small mosquitoes are ex-
cellent food, and can be replaced by flies (137), crickets
and liver bits  (134) as they mature.  Adults have survived
in excellent condition by being fed twice weekly, crickets
(two to three) alternated with worms (134).
Suggested diets for  the appropriate life  stage  for amphibi-
ans are presented in Table 4.  Adult axolotls thrive on
beef heart with vitamins A, D, B complex  and powdered CaCO0
added  (142) .                                               ^

Breeding/Rearing -

The breeding  and rearing of most amphibious  species  are
more complicated than those of birds or mammals because
amphibians show no parental care for the  young.   In  frogs
and toads, the  eggs  are laid  in water and fertilized ex-
ternally  by the  males during  amplexes.   (Salamanders have
internal  fertilization by means of  spermatophores deposited
by the male and taken up by the females into her  cloaca.)
The eggs  are  left to develop, hatch and mature on their own.
Therefore, rearing techniques must  include care for  the or-
ganisms from  the zygote stage to the adult stage.  Table 5
presents  the  natural breeding habits and  numbers of  eggs for
some North American  and European Anurans.
                            56

-------
      Table 4.   FOOD RECOMMENDED FOR AMPHIBIAN  LARVAE
                  YOUNG ANIMALS AND ADULTS
Stage In Life History
Anura
Newly hatched larvae
Older larvae
Boiled spinach or lettuce,
green part of Romaine let-
tuce; for Xenopus:  dried
nettle or alfalfa powder,
dried yeast, egg or liver
powder

As above
Newly metamorphosed
animals  (terrestrial)
Drosophila
Juveniles  (terrestrial)
Larger Drosophila species,
mealworms, small earth-
worms, crickets
Metamorphosed animals
 (more or less aquatic) and
large, neotenic larvae
 (e.g., axolotl)
For Xenopus;  Tubifex,
Enchytraeus, small pieces
of liver; later:  earth-
worms and beef heart cut
into small blocks
Adults  (aquatic)
For Xenopus:  earthworms,
beef heart cut into small
blocks
Adults  (terrestrial)
Larger  species of Drosophila,
house flies, mealworms,
crickets, grasshoppers and
other insects.
Source   (142)
                               57

-------
                            Table 5.   NATURAL BREEDING HABITS OF COMMON
                                  NORTH AMERICAN AND EUROPEAN ANURA
     Scientific
        Name
                 SPECIES
                    Common
                     Name
               Breeding Season
               (in northern
                 latitudes)
                  Approximate Number of Eggs
                   Laid by One Female,  and
                      Mode of Deposition
I/I
CO
Rana catesbiana

Rana clamitans

Rana palustris

Rana pipiens
Rana sylvatica
Hyla grucifer
Hyla versicolor

Bufo americanus
Bufo Fowleri
Rana esculenta
Rana temperaria
Bufo bufo
                         Bullfrog
                         Green frog
Leopard frog
Woodfrog
Spring peeper
Treefrog

American toad
Fowler's toad
Edible frog
Common frog
Common toad
                 June-July
                 June-August
                         Pickerel frog    April-May
April-May
March-April
April-June
May-July

May-June
May-June
May
February-April
March-April
10,000 or more, in large film on
surface, 60 cm across
1000-4000, in film on surface,
less than 30 cm across
2000-3000, in firm globular
masses attached to twigs
3000-5000, in flattened sphere
2000-3000, in globular mass
800-1000, laid singly among plants
1000-2000 in small packets of
30-40 eggs
4000-8000, in two long strings
Up to 8000, in two long strings
1600-1900, in clumps
1000-4000, in large clumps
3000-4000, in two long strings

-------
George W. Nace, et al. ,  began an amphibian maintenance pro-
gram in the mid-W60' s at Ann Arbor, Michigan and has very
successfully bred and reared a variety of frogs,  and sala-
manders, with the purpose of developing genetically defined
strains.  A general review of their techniques and inserts
from various other maintenance programs follows (for speci-
fic detail, see 137).

It has been discovered that breeding can be induced in
Anurans by injecting the animals with pituitary tissues
from other frogs, and progesterone (145).  Females can be
injected and stripped of their eggs which are then insemin-
ated by sperm from excised testes, or males can also be in-
jected and natural breeding behavior allowed to occur.  The
artificial method allows for unique egg-sperm distributions
or for other specific handling techniques.   (The specific
procedure for inducing ovulation can be found in reference
138).  Generation time  (at Ann Arbor, Michigan) is 13 to 15
months.

Embryos are held in enamel pans and water  (unchlorinated) is
changed every third day.  When the tadpoles begin to swim
they are transferred into specially designed bottles which
hold 25 to 75 larvae, depending on the species and size of
individuals.  These are one-gallon bottles with their bot-
toms removed.  A one-hole cork is fitted in the neck, they
are positioned upside-down and a leveling-drain tube extends
from it to the desired water level.  A wire screen keeps the
 tadpoles from the narrow neck  and from debris that collects
 at the  bottom of  this aquarium.   Water is  slowly added to
 the system and circulated through it.   There is  good evi-
 dence  that the average growth  rate  of tadpoles decreases as
 the density rises (138).

 Metamorphosed animals are transferred to larger  plastic con-
 tainers with appropriate water circulation.   These are
 tipped up on one  side leaving  a pool at the lower end and a
 terrestrial area  at the other.

 Adults  are housed in larger containers that can  be easily
 cleaned and that  provide both  aquatic and terrestrial areas.

 Salamanders breed from January to June.   After two to three
 months  some species can be bred again.  Breeding is conveni-
 ently induced in  the Mexican axolotl by a sudden decline in
 temperature (22°C to 12°C for  two days).  Males  and females
 are kept separately except to  breed and put together into
 the colder water.  The breeding chamber should be-sheltered
 from light and no food provided until after oviposition on
 plastic tubes (13mm diameter)  fitted to aquarium sides be-
 low the water line.  Eggs are  reared in 14° to 18°C water
 in shallow trays.  During culture,  crowding should be

                             59

-------
 avoided.  Larvae should be fed Artemia or small Daphnia ob-
 tainable from supply houses.  Mosquitoe larvae also can be
 used.  Containers should be cleaned of detritus daily.
 Sexual maturity is achieved in males at about seven months
 and in females in nine or ten months (142).

 Special Needs -

 Larval forms need fresh, unchlorinated water, which must be
 changed frequently.  Tap water can be treated in various
 ways to remove the chlorine (134).

 Fresh live insects must be continuously available for
 adults (135, 137).

 Embryos and tadpoles need special handling (137).

 Ecological Role -

 Anurans are carnivorous animals that feed on a great variety
 of invertebrate species, particularly insects.  Many larger
 predators utilize them as a food source.  Birds,  snakes,
 turtles and mammals feed on the adults, and the tadpoles
 provide food for predators associated with aquatic habitats
 (133).

Longevity -

Rana pipiens has achieved life spans of three years in the
laboratory  (134).

Problems with Mass Culture -

Mass culture of anurans requires a large supply of unchlo-
rinated water  (134,137) and sufficient lab personnel to
feed and maintain the various life stages.

The susceptibility of frogs and toads to parasites is well
known and health maintenance programs including penicilin
inoculations, etc., may be required (137,146).

Toxicity Testing -

Larval and adult frogs and toads have been used in studies
of the effects of pesticides on survival and reproductive
behavior in outdoor enclosures '147,148,149,150 151) and
under lab conditions (152,153,154,155,156).'  Heavy metal
(157 ) and irritant vapor (158,159) studies have also been
performed.  Their use in cancer research is very extensive
(160,161,162,163,164).
                             60

-------
General Suitability -

In toxicity tests, the accessibility of the early life
stages of anurans and the sensitivity of frog skin makes
them very suitable subjects.  An increase in breeding
amphibians in recent years has made them more available than
in the past.

Rana pipiens is the most likely subject due to its wide use
in many research areas, its availability and the large body
of basic information that has been gathered.  Ambystoma sp.
are salamanders that have received much previous attention
and are being bred at the University of Michigan Amphibian
Facility  (137).

Ecological Alternatives -

Turtles, Lizards.
                             61

-------
Chelonia
 Introduction  -

 Turtles are reptiles with a very long history on earth.
 They are  shelled organisms that are mostly associated with
 aquatic environments, but wholly terrestrial species are
 not uncommon.  The feeding habits of turtles are quite
 variable  and most species seem to be omnivorous, feeding
 on a great variety of plants and animal materials.  They
 are found in many natural habitats, particularly around
 ponds, streams and rivers.

 Caging/Lab Conditions -

 Aquatic turtles have been adequately housed in concrete
 tanks  (130 x  72 cm) lined with paraffin through which
 unchlorinated water was constantly circulated and main-
 tained at a depth of 25 cm.  Wooden platforms were pro-
 vided onto which the turtles could crawl.  Terrestrial
 species were kept in dry tanks and provided with water
 for drinking  (165).

 Terrariums are also excellent enclosures for keeping tur-
 tles, and are easily transported (133).

 Nutrition -

 Ground horsemeat and lettuce is a suitable diet for many
 species of turtles (165) and raw hamburger and table scraps
 are also  recommended ( 133).  In the wild they consume
 insects,  crayfish and other invertebrates.

 Breeding/Rearing -

 No information is available on breeding turtles in captiv-
 ity.  Since they are egg layers, the collecting of eggs
 from natural nest sites is a possibility.  Most species
produce large amounts of eggs yearly.

 Ecological Role -

Turtles are basically omnivorous reptiles and are important
elements  in the aquatic systems.  They are predators on all
types of  invertebrates and some species are avid consumers
of aquatic vegetation.
                             62

-------
Problems with Mass Culture -

Turtles are susceptible to a great variety of parasites and
diseases including tuberculosis and many types of Salmonella
(166).

Toxicity Testing -

Turtles have been used in terrestrial DDT studies (167) and
parathion distribution studies in aquatic ecosystems (152).

General Suitability -

Turtles might prove very suitable for testing.  Their court-
ship rituals are unique and may supply a means by which
behavioral modifications, etc., might be studied.  However,
their external dermal skeleton makes minor surgical tech-
niques difficult.

Their morphology and taxonomy are known and sexes are easily
distinguished  (165).  Terrapene sp. has a number of terres-
trial species and is recommended for use in the toxicity
testing of terrestrial forms.  Young snapping turtles
(Chelydra serpentina)are frequently used in laboratory ex-
periments, and though primarily an aquatic species, they are
a likely second choice.
                           .  63

-------
Squamata ~ Lizards

Introduction -

The lizards are represented in North America by five fami-
lies:  the iguanids  (Iguanidae), the skinks  (Scincidae), the
glass lizards and alligator lizards  (Anguidae), the whiptails
(Teiidae), and the geckos  (Gekkonidae).

Caging/Lab Conditions -

Lizards can be housed in terrariums  (133) , wooden cages
with glass doors  (168), or nearly any escape proof enclos-
ure.  Many lizard species are desert or tropical forms and,
being poikilothermic, require rather warm ambient conditions.
Some recommended temperatures are 85° to 90°F for iguanas
(169)  (this can be achieved locally by infrared lamps) and
75° to 85°F for gila monsters  (168).  Arboreal species should
have appropriate props  (170).

Photoperiod is important for the regulation of the endocrine
system in some lizards and should be regulated if animals
are kept indoors  (171).  Light might also influence feeding
in certain lizard species and it has beer reported that re-
luctant feeders can often be induced to eat by putting them
under a wide spectrum artificial light (170).

Nutrition -

Most lizards are carnivorous and can be maintained on a
large variety of foods.  However, there are some native
herbivorous species, such as chuckwalla, in the southwest.
Iguana iguana, a common South American lizard seen frequently
in pet stores is also herbivorous and can be satisfactorily
maintained on fresh green vegetables  (169).

Carnivorous  species  like  Sceloporus, a native iguanid,
have been fed larval wax  moths (Galleria mellonella)  (172)
and other easily obtainable insects.  Some  desert  lizards
will not eat if  their body temperature  is below 35 to 40°C.

Gila monsters, Heloderma,  have been maintained  for years on
a diet of hens eggs(one  every two  weeks).   Ground whole
rat was  substituted  for a time with no  significant effect
on weight (168).

Water should be  provided  ad libitum, though certain desert
species  will make little  use  of  it.   Some Anolis may not
                             64

-------
drink at pools, but will only take water in the form of dew '
off of leaves.  Spraying the cage may be the only means of
watering this lizard group (173).

Breeding/Rearing -

There is no information concerning captive breeding in
lizards.  They are egg layers and usually breed in the
spring in nature.

Special Needs -

Infrared lamps or some other local heat source may be re-
quired for lizard cages.

Live food may be necessary because lizards respond to
movement and under natural conditions attack only moving
prey.

Behavioral Restrictions -

Many desert lizards are highly territorial {e.g. Crotaphytus)
and there may be some difficulty in caging individuals of
this species together in any numbers.  However, Anolis can
be housed in rather large quantities in cages with suffi-
cient vertical twig surface for all individuals (173).

Ecological Role -

Lizards are both primary consumers, insectivorous, and
carnivorous (Gila monsters eat eggs, young oirds and
mammals).  They all, in turn, are consumed by predatory
snakes, birds and mammals.

Problems with Mass Culture -

Lizards, like most reptiles, are relatively unprolific.
Their breedability in captivity has not been thoroughly
investigated and their potential as laboratory colonial
animals does not appear to be very good.

Toxicity Testing -

Lizards have not been extensively used as subjects for
toxicity testing.  However, field investigations of DDT
effects on faunal elements have included lizards  (174).

General Suitability -

Their poor availability and the lack of knowledge of their


                             65

-------
reproductive behavior in laboratory situations makes lizards
rather poor candidates for wide use as toxicity experiments.
Anolis carolinensis has been successfully bred in captivity
and would be the most likely candidate (175).

Ecological Alternatives -

Toads, snakes.
                             66

-------
Squamata-Snakes


Introduction -

Snakes are more closely related to lizards than to other
reptiles.  They are legless poikilothermic vertebrates that
are significant predators on smaller animals.   North America
has three families:  the constrictors, Colubridae, the
rattlesnakes, Viperidae, and the coral snake,  Elapidae.
Snakes of the last two groups are venomous (133).

Reptiles differ from amphibians in their ability to breed
without returning to an aquatic environment and in pos-
sessing internal fertilization.  Their eggs are laid in a
terrestrial nest.  There is no metamorphosis.

Snakes inhabit many types of habitat and are carnivorous
in their natural feeding habits.

Caging/Lab Conditions -

Snakes are easily housed in terrariums with tightly sealed
lids  (133 ), but can be kept in various types of cages.
Pea gravel or artificial grass are recommended substrates.
Fibrous substrates have been found unsuitable.  Rocks and/or
branches should be available to all snakes as aids in
ecdysis  (171,173).

Preferred ambient temperatures range from 26° to 36°C
depending on the species.  Local heat  (infrared lamps) if
supplied, will allow the snakes to position themselves in
order to achieve a desired body temperature.

Humidity can be critical for some snakes and a range from
33 to 60 percent is recommended.  At very high humidities
snakes succumb easily to bacterial infections and at low
humidity levels the danger of dehydration is always present
(171).

Proper lighting is important for feeding responses in  some
reptiles and sufficient light is most  important (l7l)«

Anesthesias for snakes are variable  (141,176>111/178»179 )•

Nutrition -

Carnivory is the rule with snakes.  Some species may need a
visual stimulus to attack and eat  (173).
                             67

-------
 Water should  be  supplied  in open bowls or other containers
 ad libitum.

 Breeding/Rearing -

 Very little information is available on the breeding and
 rearing of snakes  in  captivity.

 Special  Needs -

 A  source of heat is necessary for snakes.  Live food may be
 an additional requirement for some species.

 Behavioral Restrictions -

 Some species  are prone to biting each other and their
 keepers.

 Ecological Role  -

 Snakes are predators  on various small mammals and other
 animals.  In  turn, they are a food source for larger preda-
 tors, especially birds and mammals.

 Problems with Mass Culture -

 Reproductive  potential seems to be rather low for snakes.

 Toxicity Testing -

 Snakes  (Opheodrys)  have been analyzed for DDT content in
 open areas where spraying took place  ( 174 ) .  In toxicity
 testing  their use  has been very limited, but the effects of
 radiation on  some  species is known (180 ).

 General Suitability -

 It would be difficult to  obtain a large number of snakes
 for testing.  Thamnophis sirtalis  has been successfully
 bred in  captivity  and is  suggested for that reason.  Elaphe
 obsoleta is a common  snake and a likely second choice.

Ecological Alternatives -

 Lizards, turtles.
                             68

-------
   Birds

   Birds are a fairly large vertebrate group (about 1,780
   species in North America) that is unique because all of its
   members are feathered.   With the exception of such birds as
   emus, ostriches, penguins and a few South American waterfowl,
   all birds are capable of flight.  They are as diverse in
   their ecological roles as they ate in physical size.  Des-
   pite these facts, far fewer scientific endeavors use birds
   as subjects than mammals for a number of reasons.  First,
   most birds are protected by federal and state laws.  Second,
   birds have a high metabolic rate which means they need a
   constant supply of food, and migration is an innate urge
   which makes the maintenance of many species very difficult.
   Lastly, even when the birds can be maintained, they still
   may not breed in captivity  (this is true of other animal
   groups as well).  Because of relaxed statutes, easier main-
   tenance and breedability, exotic species have received the
   most attention in labs.  Wild North American species have
   been used only infrequently, so many gaps occur in the data
   presented here.

   The life cycles of birds are complicated and controlled by
   their endocrine glands which are stimulated by the photo-
   period of their surrounding environment.  Establishment and
   maintenance of appropriate photoperiods is a major problem
   in breeding birds.

   In spite of these difficulties in using birds in the labora-
   tory, they are potentially very valuable subjects.  First,
   birds are very important in the world ecosystem.  They are
   primary and secondary consumers, feeding on plants, inverte-
   brates and vertebrates alike.  They in turn are food for
   mammalian predators  (including man), a few amphibians and
   reptiles, and a few species of birds.  Second, most birds
   are highly instinctual and therefore are routine and stereo-
   typical in certain aspects of their behavior.  This means
   that differences or alterations in some behavioral norms
   can easily be measured.  Last, a vast array of ecological
   roles can be seen in this group of animals.

   While limited background information hinders in-depth testing
   of most birds, it is evident, nevertheless, that many avian
   species are good indicators of environmental quality and
   good potential test subjects.  A summary table indicating the
   suitability of birds for toxicology testing is.provided  in
/  Table 6.
                                69

-------
TABLE 6, SUITABILITY OF BIRDS FOR TOXICOLOG1CAL TESTING
•tl -H >.
!o c >
a -H -H
i-( T) -P
•H (UP.
B 0) 10
> l-l U
5 M
Pelicans and F P
Cormorants


Loons and F P
Grebes
Waterfowl E E-G


Shearwaters P P
and Petrels

Herons and Ibises G P

Cranes, Rails E P
and Coots

Woodcock E P


Gulls and E P
Terns
Woodpeckers E P

Raptors F P

Doves and E E
Pigeons
Bobwhitc Quai] E E


Pheasant E E


S S2 § 2 -3
S -3 2 -H S
*w 0) D W U >— 1 A4 •'-'
O-U OOJ 'H T]fl CF1
11 -H > *> " 'H "-1 73
MB 01 Ci 01 C 3 P.P.
BE H -^ «! /" " «
U & K 0 U
F P *Large size, F DZ
slow repro-
ducers, expen-
sive to house
F P *Don't live well P ' Di'D2
in captivity
E-G G-F * E A««B,
Al
J
P P 'Don't live P D. ,D.
well in
captivity
F P *Don't live well P D, ,D,
in captivity
F P *Hard to house, F D,
don't breed in
captivity
P P "Very high P D,
strung, hard
to teed
P F *Don't breed F-P Di'D?
in captivity
F P *Doii't breed in F-P A, ,C.
captivity . i
F F **Require large F C,E
cages
E E E A3,A4

E E 'Cannibalistic E A3'A4
if not "de-
be aked"
E E 'Cannibalistic E A,, A,
if not "de- J
beak od "
01
u
c
01
tf O
•f-l CJ
Is

Aq



Aq


Aq

Aq


Aq

Aq-Ed


Fo-Ed


Aq

• Fo •' .

Fo-Gr-Do

Gr-Do

Fo-Gr


Go-Gr


OJ W
4-* 0
01 -H
(U O
en (U
Cn CL
3 Ul

Phalacrocorax curitus



Podilymbus podiceps


Anas platyrhynchos
Branta canadensis"
Puffins griseus


Puffinus griseus

Fu] ica. americana


Ph^lohela minor


Larus argentatus

Helanerpes erythrocephalus
/
Falco sparverius
Tvto alba
Columba livia

Colinus virqinianus


Phasianus coJchicus



-------
TABLE 6  (CONL),   SUITABILITY OF BIRDS FOR TOXICOLOGICAL TESTING

Miscellaneous
Galliforms

Perching
Birds -
Granivores
Perching Birds -
Insectivores
Perching Birds -
Onmivores
Domestic
Ga.1. liforms

Japanese Quail

Exotic;-,
Availability
E


E

E
E
E

E

E
Breeding
in Captivity
E


P

P
F-P
E

. E

F
Ease of
Maintenance
E


G

F
E-G
E

E

G
Previous Use
in Testing
F


P

F
G
E

E

P
y>
c
o
•H
4J
U
• H
M
JJ
V)
0
K
*Cannibalistic
if not "de-
beaked"
*Territoriality

*Territoriality
**u-starlings ,
weaver finches,
territorial ity
Cannibal istic
if not "de-
beaked"
Cannibalistic
if not "de-
beaked"
**Many species
>~
4J
•H rt
r-* Id
•H U
f-H 43 -H
tj 4J O Q)
0) -H --, ^
C 3 O O
O W O (S
0 W
E A ,A
3 4

P A3'A4

F A2/C
G C,A,,
•E '. A3,A4

E A3,A4

G A,CI,
                                                              IU
                                                            -P l-l
                                                            ra m
                                                            4-* ^-1
                                                            •H QJ
                                                            43 H
                                                            (tj ft
                                                           Fo-De



                                                           Fo-Gr


                                                           Fo-Gr


                                                           Fo-Gr-Do


                                                           Do



                                                           Do
     •a
     o en
     4-) C)
                                                                         Dendragupus obscurus
Melospiza melodia
Richmondena cardinali s
Turdus migratorius


Sturnus vu3garis
Passer domesticus

Callus qallus
                                                                         Coturnix coturnix
                                                                         lielopsittacus undulatus
                     in captivity  and
                     unavailable in
                     large numbers

-------
                          TABLE  6 (CONT.),  SUITABILITY OF BIRDS FOR TOXICOLOGICAL TESTING
                                                       LEGEND
    ECOLOGICAL ROLE
    A.   Herbivorous - Terrestrial
         1.   Nector Feeding-
         2.   Fruit Eating
         3.   Seed Eating
         4.   Granivores
    B.   Herbivorous - Aquatic
    C.   Carnivorous - Terrestrial
         1.   Insectivorous
         2.   Other Invertebrates
         3.   Vertebrates
    D.   Carnivorous - Aquatic
         1.   Invertebrates
         2.   Vertebrates
    E.   Carrion Foragers
    C  = Nestling Diet
                                          HABITAT PREFERENCE
Fo
Gr
De
Aq
Ed
Do
Forest
Grassland
Desert
Aquatic
Edge
Domestic
E = Excellent
G = Good
F = Fair
P = Poor
                    RESTRICTIONS
                *A11 species protected
                  by legislation
               **Some species protected
                  by legislation
                 Unprotected
Sources:  Literature cited in text, interviews of scientists

-------
Pelecanidae and Phalacrocoracidae


Introduction -

These two families are represented by the pelicans and cor-
morants.  Pelicans are large, bulky water-birds with long
flat bills and tremendous throatpouches.   Cormorants are
dark water-birds the size of loons and geese.  Both are pri-
marily coastal birds, are active during the day, and feed on
aquatic animal life.  They are colonial nesters and migrate
to their northern breeding grounds each year where most nest
on the ground along the rocky shores.  They make their nests
from pebbles and other debris they find on the nesting site.
Like most other birds, they are protected by legislation.

Caging Conditions -

A cage 6: x  6 feet made of wood, cement and chicken wir^,
painted, and  fitted with indoor-outdoor carpeting will
house three pelicans or six cormorants.  This  cage was
equipped with tree trunks and large  tanks  for  bathing and
drinking  (181).

nutrition -

In captivity, pelicans and cormorants  can  be maintained  on
a diet of  fish  ( 182) .  Food and water should  be  given ad
libitum.

Breeding/Rearing -  _

Pelicans  and cormorants  usually lay two  eggs per  clutch  and
one  clutch per  year  ( 183 ) .  Their young are altricial  and
born with  their eyes closed.  They are also nidicolous
 (remain in the  nest until  fledged)   (183)-  These birds  are
 colonial  nesters (182).

Behavioral Restrictions  -

 These birds are large and have  voracious appetites (182).

Ecological Role -
                  t
 Pelicans and cormorants are at the top of their food chain.
 They are carnivores and feed mainly on marine .vertebrates.
                              73

-------
Problems with Mass Culture -

Pelicans and cormorants are difficult to maintain in captivit
for  long periods of time and are even harder to breed in
captivity  (184) .  They do not mature rapidly as smaller
birds do and they lay small clutches  (183).  They require
a good deal of  space and are expensive to  feed  (182).

Toxicity Testing -

Because of maintenance problems most of the work on these
birds has been  done in the field.  DDT and toxaphene levels
have been checked in birds found dead in the field  (185).
DDT  and its metabolities were studied in penned cormorants
(186) .  The largest body of knowledge comes from oological
studies done in the field  (184, 187, 188,  189, 190).

General Suitability ~

Pelicans and cormorants make good subjects for short-term
and  field studies because they are large and easily marked
for  identification.  Their eggs are also easily obtainable.
They feed on a  wide variety of marine organisms thus making
them good indices for environmental contamination levels.
The difficulty  encountered in maintaining  and breeding them
makes them poor candidates for chronic toxicity testing.
The cormorant was chosen as a selected species because it
has been used more frequently in laboratory tests.

Ecological Alternatives -

Gulls,  terns, herons, shearwaters.
                            74

-------
Gaviiformes and Podicipediformes


Introduction -

These two orders are represented by loons and grebes.   Loons
are swimming birds that are larger than ducks but have
shorter necks than geese.  Grebes are duck-size.   Both loons
and grebes are expert divers.  They have elaborate courtship
displays, like those of ducks and geese.  Both groups  are
ground nesters and migrate to their breeding grounds each
year.  Loons are basically northern birds ranging from the
north edge of the United States to Labrador and Newfoundland.
Some populations winter in the Gulf of Mexico.  Grebes are
more widespread in their distribution and are found through-
out the United States.  Grebes, like most birds, are di-
urnal, while loons are crepuscular.  Both groups are pro-
tected by legislation.

Breeding/Rearing -

Loons and grebes usually lay two eggs per clutch and one
clutch per year.  Their'young are precocial and hatch with
their eyes open.  Like most precocial young, they are
nidifugous  (183) .
                                   t
Ecological Role -

Loons and grebes are aquatic carnivores arid feed on a variety
of vertebrate and invertebrate species.

Problems with Mass Culture -

These birds are poor breeders in captivity  (182).

Toxicity Testing -

DDT and toxaphene have been applied to  the habitat of loons
and grebes.  They have also been fed in capsule form to
these birds  (185) .

General Suitability -

Loons and grebes are fairly available,  but they are poor
breeders in captivity.   The pied-billed grebe was chosen  as
a selected  species on the basis of its-availability.

Ecological Alternatives  -

Diving Ducks.

                              75

-------
 Anseriformes
 Introduction -

 There are 43 species  of waterfowl  in  the U.S.  (see Table  7),
 nine species of swans and geese, and  34 species of ducks.
 All  species  of  waterfowl  have webbed  or at  least partially
 webbed feet  to  increase swimming efficiency.   They have
 down-covered precocial young that  are able  to  swim soon after
 hatching.  The  individual species  exhibit a remarkable diver-
 sity in size, form, behavior, and  environmental requirements,
 They range in size  from the pygmy  geese  (Nettapus) to the
 trumpeter swan  (Cygnus cygnus)  and have a variety of bills
 which are modified  to suit the  individual species' feeding
 habits.

 Some species such as  the  mallard  (Anas platyrhynchos) are
 practically  omnivorous in their diet.  Others, such as the
 common shoveler (Anas clypeata) are purely  strainers of
 aquatic life.   A flock of geese can cause significant damage
 to an agricultural  grain  crop.

 Waterfowl are migratory and the largest concentration of
 breeding is  in  Manitoba and the potholes of the Dakotas.  A
 less impressive number of them  breed  along  the coasts of
 North America.   A few refuges have established flocks of
 year 'round  residents, especially  in  the case of the Canada
 goose (Branta canadensis)  (191).

 Caging/Lab Conditions -

A recommended pen for  ducks is  30  x 15 x 6  feet.  This will
house  five adult birds.  The birds must be  provided with
access to water  10 inches  or more  deep (192).  Pens of this
size with nest  boxes,  250  gallon water troughs and feeders,
were used to breed mallards (193).  A  14L:10D photoperiod
is recommended  (194).  See Figure  2 for the mallard test
chamber  used at  the Denver Wildlife Research Center and
Figure 3  for the cages used.  See  Figure 4  for the outdoor
mallard  cages used at  Patuxent Wildlife Research Center.

A more elaborate structure is a 12 x  7 foot room with one-
way glass windows so  that  the birds can be  observed without
being disturbed  (194) .

Nutrition -

Commercial game bird  breeder ration is available, but many
 labs  supplement this  with  millet,  cracked corn, wheat, milo,
 and  barley,  all fed ad libitum  (195).  An alternate diet

                             76

-------
                   Table 7.  DISTRIBUTION OF INDIGENOUS BREEDING
                    WATERFOWL SPECIES BY ZOOGEOGRAPHIC REGIONS


                        Palearctic^-Nearctic Neotropicals Australian Ethiopian Oriental

Magpie Goose  (1 sp.)                                         1
Whistling Ducks (9spp.)                24           233
Swans and Geese             15         9         2           2
    (21 spp.)
Freckled Duck  (1 sp.)                                        1
Sheldgeese and Shelducks     4                   623
     (15 spp.)
Steamer Ducks  (3 spp.)                           3
Perching Ducks (13 spp.)     214           3          43
Dabbling Ducks              11         9        10           8          8     -  3
     (39 spp.)
Pochards (16 spp.)           652           2          21
Sea Ducks (20 spp.)         14        16         1           1
Stiff-tailed Ducks           113           2          1
     (8 spp.)

 Europe, Asia north of the Himalayas, and northern Africa
     i
2
 North America, Greenland, northern Mexico, and Hawaiian Islands

 South and Central America (except Mexican uplands), and West Indies

 Australia, New Zealand, New Guinea, Melanesia, and Polynesia

 Africa (except northern part), southern Arabia, and Madagascar

 India, Southeast Asia, Sumatra, Java, Borneo, and Philippine Islands


Source:  (196)

-------

Figure 2.  Mallard test chamber.  Denver Wildlife Research
           Center, Denver, Colorado
Figure 3.  Raptor cages converted into mallard cages
                              78

-------
                                          gj


Figure 4.  Mallard cages (base 4*  x 4').
           Patuxent Wildlife Research Center
                      79

-------
consists of cracked corn with quartz and oyster shell grit
fed aid libitum  (192).  In the wild, grazers, such as B. can-
adensis feed on all sorts of grains, while aquatic strainers
such as A. clypeata feed primarily on spaeriids, gastropods,
mayflies, and caddisflies.  Waterfowl consume an average of
230 gm of food per day  (191).   Water should be available at
all times.

Breeding/Rearing -

Waterfowl are territorial during the breeding season.  Some,
such as the gadwall (Anas strepera), Canada goose  (B. cana-
densis), and greater scaup  (Aythya marila) are colonial
nesters.  Waterfowl seek nesting sites that suit their indi-
vidual ecological niches.  Hence, they are found nesting on
land, on improvised platforms, in tree holes, on limbs, and
over water in marshy areas.

Hole nesters such as the wood duck (Aix sponsa) have larger
clutches and longer incubation periods than ground nesters
(see Table 8).   Clutch size in all waterfowl varies with
environmental and physiological stimuli and with the
breeding abilities of the adults.  In general, a large clutch
size means small eggs and vice versa ( 191).  Some ducks
such as the ruddy duck (Oxyura jamaicensis) lay their own
weight in eggs  (191 ).

There is a great variety in average clutch size between
species (5.1 to 9.3 eggs per clutch)  and also in the time it
takes to lay the clutch (191).

Renesting, dump nests, parasitic layers, and indeterminate
layers are some phenomena which are characteristic of the
duck nesting period.  The best known parasite layer is the
redhead (Ay thy a americana).  Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos}
and pintail (Anas acuta)  are the most persistent renesters.
Gadwall (Anas sjtrepera)  are indeterminant layers (191).

Geese and swans become mature in their second or third year.
Ducks mature in their first, but are usually not successful
breeders until their second year.  Waterfowl young are all
precocial.  For an idea of fledging periods see Table 9.

Imprinting is a behavioral phenomena found only in precocial
young.  During a relatively brief period shortly after hatch-
ing, the young will develop a permanent attachment for any
moving object presented to it whether it be a human, a dog
or a matchbox on a string Q.91).

-------
                       Table 8.   INCUBATION PERIODS OF VARIOUS WATERFOWL

          Species  or  Group                               Days

     Magpie Goose                               28-30
     Whistling Ducks                            26-30(White-backed Duck 31)
     Swans                                      34-40
     True Geese                                 24-30(Ross1  Goose 21-23)
     Sheldgeese and Shelducks                   28-30
     Perching Ducks                             28-32(Brazilian Teal 25;
                                                      Muscovy Duck 35)
     Dabbling Ducks                             21-28(Hottentot Teal 18-20;
      1                                                Crested Duck 30)
     Pochards                                   23-29
     Sea Ducks                                  25-30(Bufflehead 22; Goosander
M                                                     and Harlequin Duck  30-32)
     Stiff-ta.'.led  Ducks                         21-27 (Musk Duck and Black-
                                                      headed Duck unknown)


     Source:   (196).

-------
       Table  9.  FLEDGING  PERIODS OF VARIOUS WATERFOWL
   Species

Magpie Goose
Fulvous Whistling Duck
Mute and Trumpeter Swans
Black and Bewick's Swans
Pink-footed Goose
Graylag Goose
Snow Goose
Hawaiian Goose
Canada Goose  (large races)
Cackling Canada Goose
Ross1 Goose
Freckled Duck
Shelducks
Egyptian Goose
Gadwall
Mallard
Northern Shoveler
Pintail
Blue-winged Teal
Redhead
Canvasback
European Pochard
Ring-necked Duck
White-winged Scoter
Common Goldeneye
Ruddy Duck
Days
Source:  (196).
                             82

-------
Behavioral Restrictions -

Most waterfowl are very territorial during the breeding seas-
on.  It is necessary to minimize crowding during this time
if reproductive studies are being carried on.

Ecological Role -

Waterfowl are primarily herbivores, utilizing many plant
foods but preferring grains and aquatic vegetation.  In late
spring and summer they become insectivorous, scouring the
lakes and rivers for all forms of insect life.  Ducklings,
goslings and cygnets thrive on this high protein diet.  Dur-
ing the nesting period waterfowl prefer secluded sites near
small bodies of water.  Once the young are off the nest the
families head for open, bodies of water whare the young are
preyed upon by turtles, hawks and larger carnivores  (191).

Longevity -

Waterfowl are rather long-lived, but between species there
is a wide range of life spans.  For a more specific  list see
Table 10.

Problems with Mass Culture -

Waterfowl are protected by legislation and so might  be hard
to procure.

Ducks, geese and swans can be heavily parasitized  but  the
effects of this are not known.  Juveniles are more prone  to
parasitism, because of their feeding habits, than  adults  are.
Bacteria pose the greatest threat to waterfowl  although fowl
cholera, avian tuberculosis and malaria  also occur.   Infesta-
tions with trematodes, mites and leeches  are common  (191).

Toxicity Testing -

Because of their large size, ecological  role,  and  importance
in hunting, much testing has been done with waterfowl,  al-
though work with captive birds has  been  limited because of
the stringent migratory bird code.  Most of the penned
studies have used the oral route of exposure  for pesticide
testing  (193,195,197,198,199,200,201).   Disease studies have
been another area where oral administration was used (202).
Heavy metals and pesticides are also  introduced into wild
populations by the oral route  (203,204,205,206,207).  This
has been the major route of exposure  for heavy metals too
 (192,208).  Spraying  enclosed  fields  and ponds has been
another field study method-(209,210,211).
                              83

-------
       Table  10.   SOME LONGEVITY RECORDS TOR WATERFOWL
     Species

Magpie Goose
Wandering Whistling Duck
Trumpeter Swan
Whistling Swan
Graylag Goose
Canada Goose

Egyptian Goose
Northern Green-winged
  Teal
Common Mallard

Canvasback
European Pochard

Redhead
Common Goldeneye
Maximum Age in Years

26 (captivity)
15 1/4 (captivity)
32 1/2 (captivity)
19 (captivity)
26 (captivity)
33 (captivity);
23 (wild)
25 (captivity)

20 (wild)
20 (captivity);
16 (wild)
19 (captivity)
20 (captivity; fertile
    entire period)
16 1/2 , (captivity)
17 (wild)
Source:  (196).
                             84

-------
Post mortem metabolism studies are another area of study  (113).
Yolk injection  is a common method of pesticide and drug study.
The stomach tube has been used in toxicological test-
ing  (212).  Tests for the presence of certain metals have
also been developed  (213).  Reference 214 has extensive tests
of pesticides on waterfowl.

General  Suitability -

Waterfowl are large enough to be easily handled.  Many of
them will breed readily  in captivity, especially  the mallard
 (Anas  p1atyrhynchos) and black duck  (Anas rubripes).  Some
waterfowl species are indeterminate layers(e.g., A. strepera)
and will continue to renest if their eggs are destroyed or
removed.  This  makes them good candidates for oological
studies  as they offer an almost  unlimited supply  of  eggs  dur-
ing the  breeding season. Because of their  sensitivity, they
are good models for ecological indices.  Finally, most species
adapt  readily to laboratory conditions.  A major  drawback to
their  use in toxicological research is the migratory water-
fowl code.  The Canada goose  and mallard duck were  chosen as
selected species because of their abundance  and adaptability
to laboratory conditions.

Ecological Alternatives  -

Other  waterfowl of  the world.
                              85

-------
Procellariiformes
Introduction -

This order is commonly called the tubenosed swimmers because
of the peculiarly shaped openings of the birds' nasal pass-
ages.  These sea birds have the ability to convert sea water
to usable drinking water by means of their nasal salt glands.
Shearwaters and petrels are usually found far out at sea.
They are gull-like birds but their flight is distinctive.
They are migratory and have diurnal habits.  Their popula-
tions are small compared to most other birds and they are
protected by legislation.

Caging Conditions -

Sea birds do not keep well in the lab, and to date, no suc-
cessful arrangement has been made for long term laboratory
studies of them.

Nutrition -

In nature, sea birds eat fish, Crustacea, cephalopods, and
macroplankton (215,216).  It is not necessary to give them
freshwater as they can convert sea water with their nasal
salt glands.  However, food and water should be supplied
ad libitum.

Breeding/Rearing -

Shearwaters and petrels are colonial nesters (215).  They
have altricial young which are nidicolous.  Most petrels are
born with their eyes closed, while other sea birds are born
with their eyes opened (183) .  The Bermuda petrel is wholly
pelagic and visits land only to breed (216).  Most lay one
egg per year (183,215).  If their nest is destroyed, they
will not lay again that year (215).  Incubation varies from
six weeks to 11 weeks, depending on the species.  Young
petrels fledge at 9 1/2 weeks while shearwaters take 13 to
14 weeks (215).  Young sea birds never breed their first
year (215).  The incubation period broadly correlates with
the fledging period but apparently is not affected by egg
size.  Fledging period does not correlate .with body size.
The young have fat deposits (subcutaneous and visceral)
which probably act as reserves- when food is scarce  (215).
                             86

-------
Ecological Role -

Sea birds are aquatic carnivores feeding on both vertebrates
and invertebrates.

Problems with Mass Culture -

Sea birds, although not hard to obtain,  are not easily main-
tained in captivity and are hard to breed (215).

Toxicity Testing -

Because of their limited number and poor adaptation to lab-
oratory conditions, little testing has been done on sea
birds.  What little has been done, has been conducted in the
field.  The effects of DDT and organochlcrines on population
dynamics have been studied  (216,217,218/219).  Gas liquid
chromatography has been used on PCB concentrations (220).

General Suitability -

Sea birds range widely so they are not suitable for local-
ized studies.  They are slow reproducers (183).  Their
existing populations are too small for extensive testing to
be done  (216).  Sea birds have not yet been successfully
maintained for long periods under laboratory conditions.
The sooty shearwater was chosen as a selected  species on the
basis of its relative abundance.

Ecological Alternatives -

Gulls and terns.
                              87

-------
 Ardeidae  and Threskiornithidae
 Introduction  -

 These  two  families  are  commonly known as herons and egrets
 (Ardeidae)  and  ibises  (Threskiornithidae).  They are all
 stork-like wading birds with  long necks, long  legs and
 pointed, herons and egrets, or decurved, ibises, bills.
 They are semi-aquatic birds associated with coasts, marshes
 and rivers.   They are large birds with body lengths ranging
 from 11 inches, least bittern, to 52 inches, Great blue
 heron  (221).  They  are  primarily colonial tree nesters and
 their  colonies  are  called rookeries.  Herons,  egrets and
 ibises are diurnal  and  migratory.  There were  never large
 numbers of them, but man's encroachment has made many of
 them endangered species.  For this reason, they are all pro-
 tected by  legislation.

 Caging Conditions -

 An outdoor cage, made of chickenwire with a wooden frame and
 measuring  50  x  10  x 6 feet  has been successfully used  (20).

 Breeding/Rearing -

 Herons and their allies usually lay a clutch of three eggs
 once a year  (222).  Their young are altricial  but have their
 eyes open  at  hatching.  As with other altricial young, they
 are nidicolous  (183).   Young  ibis fledge at about five weeks
 of age (222) .

 Ecological Role -

 Herons, ibises  and  egrets are aquatic carnivore.  They feed
 on both vertebrates and invertebrates.

 Problems with Mass  Culture -

 Herons and their allies are slow breeders.  They require a
 good deal  of  space  because of their size and habits (182).

 Toxicity Testing -

These birds have been used very little in toxicological
 studies.    However,  DDT  and toxaphene have been fed to them
 in capsule form as  well as sprayed in their natural environ-
ment (185).   General pesticide studies have been done on
population dynamics in  the field (222).
                             88

-------
General Suitability -

Size is a somewhat limiting factor in using some herons.
As with most other birds, Ciconiids are protected by law.
They are fairly easy to maintain in captivity; however,
they are not easy to breed.  The American egret was chosen
as a selected species because it typifies this group of
birds.

Ecological Alternatives -

Cranes, rails, coots.
                            89

-------
 Gruidae and Rallidae
 Introduction -

 The first family is reoresented by the cranes,  the
 second family by the rails and coots.   Cranes are found on
 the prairie  and, like rails and coots are semi-aquatic.
 Cranes are large stork-like birds wnilo rails and'coots
 are plump somewhat chicken-like birds.  Both families have
 secretive habitats, are shy and much more often heard than
 seen.   Cranes, rails and coots have diurnal habits, are
 migratory and are protected by legislation.

 Breeding/Rearing -

 Gruiiforms have precocial young that are born with open eyes.
 Like most precocial birds, they are nidifugous (183)'.

 Ecological Role -

 Cranes,  rails and coots are primarily  aquatic carnivores
 and feed on invertebrate populations.

 Problems with Mass Culture -

 Cranes are slow reproducers (182).

 Toxicity Testing -

 Not much testing has been done on  this group,  however,  tissue
 residual studies have been done using  dieldrin  and organo-
 chlorides  (223,224).   Hatchability  studies have also been
 done on  a  limited scale (223).

 General  Suitability -

 Rails  and  coots  are readily available  for study,  but cranes
 are not  nearly as numerous.   The American coot  was chosen
 to  represent  this group because of  its abundance.

 Ecological  Alternatives -

Herons, ibises,  ducks.
                            90

-------
   Scolgpacidae

                                  i
   Introduction -

   Shorebirds have not been used very extensively in laboratory
   research.  The most widely used member of this group is the
   woodcock  (Philohela minor) and for this reason it will be
   discussed here.  The woodcock is a little larger than the
   bobwhite quail and has an extremely long bill.  It inhabits
   woodland swamps and leafy thickets throughout the United
   States.  At dusk, during the breeding season, it makes
   aerial displays, calling loudly,  and beating its wings.  The
   woodcock is migratory, territorial and protected by legis-
   lation.

   Caging Conditions -

   Various types of cages have been employed to house woodcock,
 *-'' ranging from a 20 x  40 x  8 feet field enclosure and a
./  4 x  4 x  5 feet cage resting on the ground, to a 22 x  29
   x  30 inch stainless steel cage in a laboratory.  All cages
   had water and food pans (225).  Hemmed burlap was placed
   over the top and front of the cages to prevent the birds
   from flushing and injuring themselves at the least disturb-
   ance.  The burlap was hemmed to keep the woodcocks from be-
   coming ensnared in its ends and injuring themselves.  Injur-
   ies of birds attempting to flush were also reduced by clip-
   ping feathers from one wing, making the cage walls opaque
   and using high cages or false ceilings of fabric  (225).  The
   smaller cages were found to be more satisfactory because
   they allowed the birds to find their food more readily.
   Smaller steel cages also helped eliminate the sanitation
   problem common in the maintenance of woodcock.

   Nutrition -

   Woodcocks were fed a diet of earthworms, mealworms and fly
   larvae placed in peat moss in food pans  (225).  Because the
   bird has a high metabolism rate, food and water should be
   supplied ad libitum  (225).

   Breeding/Rearing -

   Woodcocks have precocial  young that are born with their eyes
   open  (183).  They are nidifugous  (183).
                               91

-------
 Special Needs -

 Woodcock require a constant supply of fresh, live earth-
 worms  (38,225).

 Behavioral Restrictions -

 Woodcock are high strung and therefore prone to injuries ir
 caged  conditions.  Their cages are impossible to keep clear
 and being nonperching birds they live on the contaminated
 floors, causing themselves to become soiled  (225) .

 Ecological
Woodcocks are carnivorous, feeding on invertebrates they
find near the shores of ponds, lakes and streams.

Problems with Mass Culture -

The major problem with maintaining woodcocks is keeping an
adequate supply of fresh, live earthworms  (38,225).  This
is particularly hard to do in winter.  Another important
problem arises from the unsanitary conditions under which
the birds are caged; foot infections are a particular prob-
lem (225) .  Cages must be built to maximize cleaning effici-
ency and minimize self-inflicted injuries of the birds.

Toxicity Testing -

Because of the effort it requires to keep woodcocks, not
much work has been done with them.  DDT studies  (226,227,
228) and Heptachlor studies  (228,229) have been conducted
however, in addition to general pesticide studies  (27,230).

General Suitability -

Woodcocks are fairly available and socially tolerant of one
another.  They are relatively hardy in captivity, withstand-
ing heat and cold well and fighting off a wide range of
minor injuries and infections.  However, they are costly and
troublesome to feed and create a difficult cage sanitation
problem.  Cages must be built to minimize injuries as wood-
cocks are far more prone than other birds to injure them-
selves (225) .

Ecological Alternatives -

Snipe.
                             92

-------
Lari


Introduct ion -

The suborder Lari is composed of two groups of birds: gulls
and terns.  They are all colonial nesters.  Gulls and terns
are primarily coastal birds, but some species are also
found along river banks.  In any case, they are associated
with the aquatic environment.  Gulls range in size from the
great black-backed gull (Larus marinas)  (28-31 inches long)
to the Bonaparte's gull (Larus Philadelphia) (12-14 inches
long) ( 221).  The most widely known gull is the herring or
"sea" gull.  Terns are the size of smaller gulls and are
more streamlined than a gull.  Members of the suborder Lari
are diurnal, migratory and protected by legislation.

Nutrition -

Gulls and terns eat a variety of aquatic life, both verte-
brate and invertebrate.  In captivity, food and water
should be supplied ad libitum.

Breeding/Rearing -

Gulls and terns usually lay four eggs to a clutch and one
clutch per year (183 ).  They are colonial nesters and will
renest if their nest is destroyed early enough in the
season (184) .  The young are precocial and have their eyes
open when they hatch, but they are nidicolous  ( 183) ; the
average incubation time is 27 days, and the young are able
to fly at 43 days (231).

Ecological Role -

Gulls and terns are carnivorous in the wild, feeding on
vertebrates and invertebrates alike.  They have become
scavengers of refuse dumps.

Problems with Mass Culture -

They do not live well in captivity  (185 ).  Like other
birds they are hosts for fleas, mites, ticks, and lice(182)
                            93

-------
Toxicitv Testing -

Most testing has been done in the field because long term
studies are not possible at present .in the laboratory.
The primary route of exposure has been oral and the birds
have been tested for DDT (135, 231  )» PCB's  (220,232,233,
234, 235), organochlorines (210)/ chlorinated hydrocarbons
(236,237), general pesticide  (231 ) and pollution effects
(184) as well as eggshell changes  (ics) •

General Suitability -

Gulls and terns are hard to maintain in captivity  (185).
For short term studies and ecological studies they make
good subjects because they are colonial nesters and it is
relatively easy to capture large quantities of birds in
a short time.  Their eggs are also easily obtainable,
Herring gulls were chosen as a selected species because 01
their abundance and previous use in the laboratory.

Ecological Alternatives -

Pelicans, cormorants.

-------
Picidae^


Introduction -

This is the family of chisel-billed tree-climbers known as
woodpeckers.  These birds have stiff, spiny tails which act
as props as they hitch their way up the trees.  The males
of most species have some amount of red on the head.  They
are represented throughout the U. S. in woodlands.  They are
hole nesters, usually excavating their homes in tree trunks.
Woodpeckers are diurnal and migratory.  Like most birds,
they are protected by legislation.  Very little is known
concerning their adaptability to laboratory conditions.

Breeding/Rearing -

Woodpeckers lay two to six eggs per clutch.  There is a one-
day laying interval between eggs and a 12-day incubation
period  (215).  The young are altricial and are born with
their eyes closed.  They are nidicolous (183) and usually
fledge in about 24 days (215).  Sexes are readily disting-
uishable in breeding adults  (182).

Ecological Role -

Woodpeckers primarily eat insect larvae which inhabit the
interior of tree trunks and limbs but also eat seeds.  They
are a major check on insects that attack trees.

Problems with Mass Culture -

All birds are hosts for fleas, mites, lice and ticks and
can become heavily infested with them (132).

Toxicity Testing -

Very little work has been done with woodpeckers in this
area.  Field spraying has been done, however, and the popu-
lation dynamics that result have been studied  (238).

General Suitability -

The red-headed woodpecker has been chosen as a representa-
tive of this group because it is abundant.  However, no
member of this group of birds is judged to be very suitable
for testing.

Ecological Alternatives -

Brown creeper, nuthatch.

                            95

-------
Falconiformes  and Striqiformes
 Introduction -

 The Falconiformes are eagles, hawks, arid  falcons.  Strigi-
 formes  are owls.  Most of these birds are impressive in sist
 and perform spectacular  aerial displays.  Of all the birds,
 they  are probably the best knov/n in American folk stories.
 Their feathers  are especially adapted for soaring, sudden
 aerial  dives and silent  flight.  Their beaks and claws are
 modified into sharp cutting and tearing implements with
 which they can  grasp, kill.and eat their prey.  Members of
 the order Falconiformes  are diurnal, while Svrigiformes are
 nocturnal.  Like most other North American species of birds,
 raptors are migratory.   Some of them, such as the bald eagle
 (Halioeetus leucocephalus) are on the Federal endangered
 species list.   Although  some species are very restricted in
 their distribution, most are represented at least by a sub-
 species throughout the United States.  With the exception of
 eagles  and fish hawks, which prey on fish, all raptors are
 associated with terrestrial environments.  Most raptors
 build their nest platforms in high tree tops or fairly inac-
 cessible nooks  and crags.  The sparrov; hawk  (Falco sparveri-
 us) is  an exception as it is commensal with humans.  It can
 be found nesting in attics, and other nooks and crannys of
 barns,  factories, school buildings, churches, etc.  (182).

Caging  Conditions -

A recommended outdoor pen for a pair of sparrow hawks is
 8 x 12  x 7 feet with a roof to keep predators out.  The
cage  consists of a wooden framework with 1 x  1-1/2 inch
mesh  partially  sunk in the ground.  Each cage has a nest box
 10 x  10 x 15 inches with a 3 inch diameter opening and a
slab  perch below the opening.  Larger scaled (50 x 20 x
6 feet)  versions of this cage were used to house multiple
pairs of hawks  (239) .  An alternate cage for a pair cf
sparrow hawks is 6 x 6 x 8 feet solid wire (240).  See
Figure  5 (Cage)  and Figure 6 (Nest Box)  for the outdoor
housing used for barn owls at the Patuxent Wildlife
Research Center.

Nutrition -

Sparrow hawks have been maintained on day-old dead cockerels
 (240), but a more rounded diet consists of ground beef
 (mostly muscle, liver, tongue, jowls and heart), vitamins,
minerals and turkey breeder crumbs (239).
                             96.

-------


                                            :
                                      •••' •;
                                          . X
                                          .•*»
                                           •>
                                           •
                                           r
                           ^
Figure 5.  Barn owl cages of chicken wire and wood,
           50* x 6' x 10', with nest boxes as shown.
           Patuxent Wildlife Research Center (Dr. I. Klaus)
                                  .
                                           -
                           33ŁL'
rat
Figure 6.  Nest box for barn owl cages.
           Patuxent Wildlife Research Center
          (Dr. I. Klaus)
                        97

-------
A  combination  of whole white  rats, white  mice  or  hamsters,
chicken heads  and  skinned  chicken necks can be substituted
for  the ground beef  (239).  This diet will sustain  most
other hawks  and owls  also, but  eagles and. fish hawks  must h
given fish  (182).  Food  and water should  be available ad
libitum.

Breeding/Rearing -

Sparrow hawks  lay  three  to seven eggs per clutch  and  will
breed their  first  year.  Pairs  need  not be housed separate
(239,241).   Peregrine falcons also lay three to seven egg:;
per  clutch,  and lay one  clutch  per year  (239).  Prairie
falcons lay  two to five  eggs  per clutch per year  (242).
Peregrine and  prairie falcons cannot be housed in multiple
pairs.  There  is usually a two  to three day laying  interval
between eggs in raptors  and incubation generally  takes 30
days.  The usual fledging  period is  also  30 days  (215).
Raptors have altricial young  which are born with  closed eyt
They are nidicolous  (183).  Most raptors  do not breed until
they are two to three years old (182).

Spec i a 1 Ne eds  -

Raptors need some  types  of roughage  in their diet to  help
them form fecal pellets..   This  can be in  the fo:rm of
feathers, fur  or crumbs  (239).  They need shelters  to esc.n,
the  wind if they are  kept  outdoors  (239).  They also  need
smaller mesh around the  cage  by the 'nest  box to keep  mammal
ian  predators  away from  the eggs and young  (239).

Behavioral Restrictions  -

Wild adult raptors never tame and even hand-reared  young
must constantly be worked  with  to keep them gentle.   Even
the  smaller hawks  are capable of inflicting deep  lacera-
tions.

Ecological Role -

With the exception of eagles  and fish hawks, raptors  are
carnivorous mammalian predators and  constitute  a  major chec
on small mammal populations.  Eagles and  fish  hawks are prŁ
dators on fish populations.

Longevity -

Next to members of the parrot family (Psittacidae), raptors
are probably the most long lived birds on earth.
                            98

-------
Problems with Mass Culture -

Raptors are relatively slow reproducers and require large
pens for breeding and rearing (182).   These birds are hosts
for external parasites also, but not to the extent that most
birds are (182).

Toxicity Testing -

Most testing has been done on wild trapped birds.  The birds
were usually fed the toxic substances in foods.  Whole bird
analysis of DDT has been done on sparrow hawks (243,244),
PCB analysis with most raptors (240,242,245,246), and
Methyl mercury has been studied in the red-tailed hawk (247).
Finally, egg shell thinning as the result of organchlorines
has been studied in nearly all raptors (138,184,188,210,237,
248), while DDT residue studies have been done with bald
eagles  (249).

General Suitability -

Raptors are fairly available and fairly easy to maintain but
with the exception of sparrow hawks they are hard to breed
in captivity and they are slow reproducers.  The larger
species are somewhat hard to handle.  However, they can be
easily marked for identification and are good indicators of
pesticide levels in their environment.  The barn owl and
sparrow hawk were chosen from this group because of their
abundance and previous use in testing.

Ecological Alternatives -

Kites, shrikes.
                             99

-------
Columbiformes
 Introduction -

 This  group  is unique  in  North America  because  it.  feeds  j.-;
 young crop  (or  pigeon) "milk",  a  pasty substance  produce-
 in the bird's crop.   Both  male  and  female birds are  capar
 of producing this  substance.  The domestic  pigeon is the
 most  common and widespread member of this group.   Most  >-:
 of this  group are  diurnal,  migratory,  and territorial.
 domestic piegon is an exception to  the last two of thes>}
 classifications.   Except for the  domestic piegon,  these
 birds are protected by legislation.

 Caging Conditions  -

 Cage  specifications differ  as the number of  birds  to be
 caged varies.   For a  cage  designed  to  house  one bird, a 2i
 x 29  x 19 cm steel rat cage (250),  and a 40  x  40  x 64 cm
 cage made of adequate materials (251)  have  been suggested.
 Pairs should be kept  in  7.3 x 2.5 cm2,  welded  wire^cages,
 having an area  of  45.7 cm2.  A  perch,  food  can, automatic
 watering device and a nest  box  (15.2 cm2, 5.1  Cm  deep)  sK
 be provided (252).  A cage  having the  dimensions  115 x  13-
 x 229 cm has also been suggested  for a  pair  of birds (253)
A  14L:10D photoperiod is  recommended  for breeding pairs
 (251, 252,  253).  Cages  should be kept in an environment ha
 ing a temperature of  20°C  + 1°C (253).  See  Figure 7 for tfc
 caging system used at the  Denver  Wildlife Research Center,

 Nutrition -

 Various  diets have been  suggested for  this  group  of  birds.
 One includes a  strictly  commercial  pellet diet while the
 other incorporates a  mixture of wheat,  maize and  tick beatf
 (251) .   Grit should be available  to the birds  at  all times
 as a  digestive  aid and mineral  supplement  (182).   See
 Figure 8 for the  feeding  and watering system  used at the
 Denver Wildlife Research Center.

 Breeding/Rearing -

 In the wild, this  group  of birds  breeds all year.  A reduce
 rate of  breeding is generally noticed  between  October and
 December (254) .  Domestic  pigeons breed readily in captivi-
 and are  available  from commercial breeders  (255).  Under
 tropical conditions,  two eggs make  up  a clutch.   The usual
 laving interval between  eggs is 1.5 to two  days,  the
                            100

-------
       fi:
Figure 7.
             Mourning  dove  cage.   Denver Wild
             life  Research  Center,  Federal
             Center, Denver,  Colorado

Figure 8.
          Food  and water  distribution system
          T;°^f^rning dove ca
-------
incubation period is 15 days, and the  fledging period is
17 days  (215) .  Adult birds stay sexually active for years
(256).  Fertility in these birds ranges from 83.3 percent
to 92.9 percent, while hatching occurs in 81.9 to 90.5 p--;•:-
cent of eggs produced  (252).  In general, experienced pa; ••<•
prove to be more successful propagators than Inexperience.:
pairs  (252).

At birth, these birds have their eyes closed and they are
both altricial and nidicolous  (183).

Ecological Role -

Pigeons and their allies eat seeds  and grains.  They are
preyed upon by domestic cats, other carnivorous mammals,
and birds of prey.

Toxicity Testing -

Much toxicity testing has been done using pigeons, ring
doves and mourning doves as test specimens in the laboratc:
PCB's have been administered to these birds to examine ef-
fects on eggshells  (257) and to measure residue  (253).
Methods of PCB administration include oral injection (253,
257), and intraperitoneal injections  (257) .  Lead residues
have been analyzed at laboratories  in birds wounded by
hunter shotgun pellets  (258).  The  synergistic effects of
dieldrin and DDE on the thyroid gland  (251) have been stuJi
along with steroid breakdown due to dieldrin and DDT admin-
istered through the diet.  The reproductive effects of DDi:
(250), the effect of DDT on the thyroid gland, and metabol:
(256,259)have been observed after oral administration.  Res
dues have been analyzed in eggs and tissues after aldrine
and dieldrin have been orally administered through a bird's
diet.  Acute toxicity has also been measured  (260).  Resict
studies have been performed using dieldrin which was admin-
istered orally  (255).  Breeding and reproductive effects  oJ
mestranol when added to synthetic grit have been studied
(252,261).  Parathion metabolism and liver activation have
been investigated (152).  Acute toxicity of a wide variety
of pesticides has been investigated (199).

Anesthetic effects of drugs and other materials on this
group of birds have been evaluated.  Pentobarbital and
ketamine, injected into the pectoral muscle, have been
used to evaluate these effects.  Anesthesia chamber experi-
ments have also been documented  (262).
                             102

-------
Various behavior studies have been performed on this bird
group.  The behavioral effects of pentobarbital (263) ,
chloropromazine (264), and promazine (264) ,  orally adminis-
tered, have been evaluated.  The reversal of discriminatory
performance due to orally administered scopolamine has  baen
observed (265).  SC-12937 has been placed on food to evalu-
ate a bird's taste discrimination (266).  General drug  tests
and their relation to behavior have been documented  (267),
and numerous Skinner-type behavior experiments have been
performed (268,269,270,271,272).

Field studies on these birds include an evaluation of breed-
ing effects after exposure to SC-12937 via wheat, and of
lead residue in tissues of birds to determine air pollution
levels (273).

General Suitability -

This group of birds has been found to be fairly suitable for
testing because they are large enough for good samples, yet
they are easily housed and marked.  Pigeons, ring doves, ana
mourning doves also have good temperaments  (182) .  Easy con-
ditioning and training are other advantages of this bird
group (267,272).  The rock dove  (domestic pigeon) has been
chosen to represent this group on the basis of availability
and previous use in testing.

Ecological Alternatives -

Seed-eating passerines.
                            103

-------
Colinus virginianus


Introduction -

This is the bobwhite quail, one of th
-------

                 "J'lfSp
         • ^,
            *- o
V •
~  «.

                J
                                          f
                               I
    *
  ••

->a      "»>
                    •

   m  .             ^.,
           •^^:r%-  -
;

Figure 9.
       Bobwhite quail outdoor  holding pens
       (base approx. 4'  x 8").  Patuxent
       Wildlife Research Center
                     105

-------
Ecological Role -

Quail eat seeds and grains.   They  are  pray  for  larger  mam-
malian carnivores.  Their young  are  preyed  upon by  raptor;
as well as mammalian carnivores.

Problems with Mass Culture -

Birds can become heavily infested  with a  number of  fleas.
mites, ticks and lice  (182).

Toxicity Testing -

In all penned studies the toxic  substances  were fed in
dietary form.  Blood parameters  (274),  behavioral  (280)  an:
residue studies (278) have been  done with DDT.   Population
dynamics were studied using chlorinated hydrocarbons  (231,
282) and PCB's  (283).  Assays were done with, aroclor  (27"
and chlorinated hydrocarbons  (284).  General  observation
studies were done with fenuron  (279) .   Residue  studies were
done with mosquitoe larvicides  (275) and  mirex  (276) .  'Thy-
roid studies were done using  calcium deficient  diets  (2u< )
Studies on bait acceptability were done with  chemical  repel
lants (285).  Population dynamics  were also studied in
fields sprayed with heptachlor  (286).

General Suitability -

The bobwhite is a prolific breeder and does not require rau;
housing space.  It is readily available and easy to maints:
For these reasons it is a recommended  species.

Ecological Alternatives -

Coturnix, pheasant, grouse.
                            106

-------
Phasianus colchicus
Introduction -

This is the ring-necked pheasant, an introduced bird in the
Americas.  It has become established in farming country,
mainly north of the Mason and Dixon Line.   A long pointed
tail readily distinguishes it from other upland game birds.
The pheasant is the largest of the wild gallinaceous birds
and, like all members of this, it is a diurnal creature.
The pheasant is a denizen of open country and an excellent
bird for sportsmen.  It is protected by legislation.  Al-
though the pheasant is not as mobile as passeriforms, it is
still considered to be migratory.

Caging Conditions -

A pen complex 22  x 6.1 . x 1.7 m was portioned into 27 in-
dividual cages.  Of these, nine pens were 2.4  x 2.4  x 1.7m
with dirt runways and 1.2x1.2  x 1.7 m plywood shelters.
The other 18 pens were only half as wide but otherwise ident-
ical (287).

Nutrition -

As with all birds, food and water should be fed ad libitum
(282,287).  A basal diet was that recommended for~~nine to
eighteen week old pheasants in the Poultry Formula Guide  (288)

Breeding/Rearing _

Like other gallinaceous birds, pheasant young are precocial
and hatch with their eyes open  (183).  They are nidifugous
(183) .  Sexes are distinguishable in adults  (182).

Behavioral Restrictions -

Pheasants are cannibalistic in close quarters.  To prevent
this, young chicks should be "debeaked" (289).

Ecological Role -
                                t
Pheasants are primary consumers, feeding on seeds and grain.
Young pheasants, however, are primarily insectivorous for
the first weeks of their  life.
                            107

-------
Problems with Mass  Culture^ -

Birds  can become  heavily  infested with ticks,  lice,  mites
and  fleas  (182) .

Toxicity Testing  -

Numerous studies  have  been done  on the pheasant.   The
two  major routes  of exposure to  toxic substances  are
mixing the substance with chow and force feeding  gel at i:.
capsules.  The  former  method was used to study populati :..
dynamics with dieldrin (290,291)  chlorinated instctici...
(282)i chlorinated  hydrocarbons  (281), DDT and toxaphene
(291)  and ethyl mercury p-toluene sulfonanilide (292).
It was also used  in monitoring studies with pesticides
(293 ), metabolism  studies with  PCB (294), residue studi,-.
with heptachlor and 14c-lindane  (295  ),  behavior  studies
with PCB's and general physiology studies  with DDT (296).
The  latter method was  used to study dieldrin residues (29
PCB residues  (298 ), eggshell thinning caused  by  dieldrin
(299)/ pharmacodynamics of dieldrin (300)  population
dynamics caused by  dieldrin (301)and  stress due to PCB's
(302 )•  Behavior due  to  dieldrin (303).LD50s  of  pesti-
cides  (199), monitoring of aldrin (304 ),  residue studies
on organochlorine insecticides  (248,  305 ), aldrin (306),
and organochlorines in general  (210)  were  also done  in
the field.

Genera!! Suitability -

Pheasants breed readily in captivity.   They are easily
maintained although they  require larger  cages  than most
other gallinaceous  birds.

Ecological Alternatives -

Grouse, turkey.
                         108

-------
Miscellaneous Galliformes
Introduction -

This group includes several species of grouse, prairie
chicken and partridge.  The birds on the whole are chicken-
size or slightly smaller.  Of the galliforms, this group
has the most spectacular courtship displays.  The booming
grounds of the prairie chicken and drumming logs of the
grouse attract many amateur and professional ornithologists
each year.  These displays are used to establish breeding
territories and also to attract mates.  Grouse designate
certain trees in their territories as roosts and use these
trees habitually.  Galliforms are classed as upland game
birds because of their topographical distribution and the
sport they provide for hunters.  Like other gallinaceous
birds, they are diurnal creatures.  They are migratory and
are protected by legislation.

Caging Conditions -

A number of different cages have been used for housing
gallinaceous birds.  A 24-1/2  x 2-1/2  x 2-1/4 inch concrete
tank with wire mesh top is recommended  (307).  An alternate
type of housing is 20 x  10  x 6 feet pens constructed of
fish netting on steel posts  (307).  A third method of hous-
ing consists of pens 8.1 ' x" 16.2 feet with turf floors and
mesh roofs (308) .

Nutrition -

Commercial game bird chow in pellet form has been fed these
birds  (308).  Food and water were given ad libitum.

Breeding/Rearing -

Gallinaceous birds have precocial young that hatch with
their eyes open.  They are nidifugous  (183) .  Grouse reach
sexual maturity in approximately 112 days  (309).

Behavioral Restrictions -

Gallinaceous birds aire cannibalistic and need to be "de-
beaked" (289).
                             109

-------
Ecological Role -

Galliforms are primarily seed and grain eaters.  Their
young, however, eat insects as well for the  first weeks of
their life.  All these birds are preyed upon by mammalian
carnivores.

Problems with Mass Culture -

Birds are hosts for a number of ticks, mites, fleas and
worms (310).

Toxicity Testing -

Zectran was fed to birds in capsule form followed by gross
observation and monitoring  (307).  Dieldrin  and malathion
were mixed with game chow and general behavior disruptions;
in the peck order were studied  (311).  Chlorinated hydro-
carbons and organophosphate were mixed with  chow and fed tc
the birds.  Various parameters of population dynamics were
then studied (308).  Field studies include work with phos-
phamidon  (312), DDT (313), and zinc phosphide baits  (314).
Telemetric studies were also done with dosed birds  (307, 31
316) .

General Suitability -

Gallinaceous birds are easy to maintain and  breed in capti/\
ity.  They are particularly useful in field  and laboratory
telemetric studies because of their physical size and high
fidelity to their territories (307).  The blue grouse has
been chosen to represent this group because  of its previous
use in testing.

Ecological Alternatives -

Coturnix , bobwhite,  pheasant.
                            110

-------
Passeriformes-Granivores
Introduction -

This group includes the cardinal, song sparrow and other
finches.  These are mostly small, sparrow-size birds and
are distributed throughout North America.  They are in-
hibitants of wooded areas and fields and are associated
therefore with a terrestrial environment.  Members of this
group are diurnal, migratory, highly territorial and
protected by legislation.

Caging Conditions -

Different investigators have used different sized cages
to house this bird group.  One cage used measures
120 x  60  x 60 cm; the floor, iroof, and back of this cage
are wood, while the front and sides consist of 12 mm
mesh (317).  Food and water must be available at all times.
A nest box should be provided in the cage, or materials for
building nests may be put at the birds' disposal  (318).
Another investigator specifies a cage 61  x"41  x 38 cm for
a single bird  (319 )•  Large communal aviaries are recom-
mended for long term experiments (320).

Nutrition -

In the lab, these birds are usually fed either pigeon chow
(275), canary or millet seed  (319), or a mixture of
biscuit meal, dried milk, soya bean meal, and maw seed.
The mixture diet is considered good for breeding  (319).
Cuttle bone should be available and grit should be pro-
vided as a digestive aid and mineral supplement  (182,319).

Breeding/Rearing -

This bird group commonly has four nestings a season with
two to five eggs per nesting.  The female usually incubates
the eggs, and incubation lasts 13 to 14 days.  Hatchlings
usually leave the nest after nine to 11 days, and are con-
sidered fleged at 45 days.  A complete molt occurs, in both
young and adults, during August or late summer (288).

Behavioral Restrictions -

These birds are highly territorial and so require separate
cages for each breeding pair  (182).


                            Ill

-------
Ecological  Role  -

Cardinals,  sparrows  and  finches  serve  as  granivores  in  th=
food chain.   Small mammals  commonly  eat their  eggs,  and
cowbirds parasitize  them (321).

Longevity -

A song  sparrow's life  span  in  the wild is approximately r-,.
years  (327).  A  cardinal lives between three to  six  years
in a natural  environment (321).

Problems with Mass Culture  -

The main problem encountered with mass culture is  parasite
Common  parasites on  this bird  group  are lice,  flies, mite?
and ticks  (321).

Toxicity Testing -

Limited toxicity testing has been performed on this  bird
group.  Acute toxicity of mosquitoe  larvicides has been
evaluated after  ingestion (275).  Reproductive effects  of
orally  administered  DDT  (319)  and residue analysis (323)
have been documented.

Various non-toxicological investigations  have  been done in-
cluding prehatching  and  hatching behavior (324) , flocking
behavior (317),  hostile,  sexual, and social behavior, and
adaptive behavior  (325).

General Suitability  -

This group, although readily available in the  wild,  does
not do well under laboratory conditions.   They are relativ;
ly difficult  to  breed  in captivity,  although there has  bee:
some success  with house  finches  (320).  Cardinals, song-
sparrows and  house finches  were recommended as test  specie:
because of their numbers  and somewhat  successful breeding
in captivity; the house  finch  was also chosen  because it i-
representative of western birds.

Ecological Alternatives  -

Blackbirds.
                            112

-------
Passeriformes-Insectivores
Introduction -

This category is represented in laboratory testing by the
families Turdidae (thrushes), Troglodytidae (wrens),
Alaudidae (larks),  and Hirudinidae (swallows).   Most species
are highly territorial with monogamous mating systems the
rule.  This presents inherent problems for attempting to
rear them under controlled laboratory conditions.

Most passeriformes are diurnal.  The swallows are crepuscul-
ar.  All are migratory and most winter in Central America.

Although they are associated with streams and other bodies
of water, insectivorous passerines are purely terrestrial
denizens.  With the exception of the horned lark which
nests on the ground, and the swallows, which nest where
their common names suggest  (i.e., banks, cliffs, barns,
chimneys), these birds are tree and shrub nesters.

Virtually all species of passerines are protected by legis-
lation which makes them generally unavailable from the wild.

Caging Conditions -

A recommended communal cage is 9  x 12  x 7 feet.  This will
house 20 to 70 individuals  (326).  Ten birds can be housed
in a cage 20 x  15  x 22 inches (327).  Individual metabo-
lism cages for these birds are 9-3/4  x 7 x  8 inches  (327).
To stimulate spermatogenesis, birds were maintained on a
15L-.9D photoperiod  (328) at 70° to 80°F  (329).

Nutrition -

These birds feed on a variety of insect life including
beetles, true bugs, spiders, caterpillars, ants  and other
small Hymenoptera.  Grasshoppers, crickets, craneflies,
moths, millipedes and snails are minor food items while
dragonflies, mites, sowbugs, daddy-longlegs and  pseudo-
scorpions are merely tasted  (330).

Breeding/Rearing -

Passerines usually lay five to six eggs per clutch with a
one-day laying interval between eggs  (330).  The incubation
                            113

-------
 period  is  usually 13  to  16  days  (215,  330).   The  young are
 altricial  and are born with eyes  closed  (183) .  Temperature
 is an important factor in determining  the  length  of  incuba-
 tion (330).   They are nidicolous  (183) and fledging  on the
 average takes 13 days (215).   Sometimes  3  broods  are reared
 per season (330).   Both  parents usually  care  for  the young
 after hatching (330) . Swallow eggs  have a 20 day incubation
 period  and young are  fledged  40 days after hatching  (215).
 Adult passerines undergo a  complete  postnuptial molt in
 August  and young birds undergo a  partial juvenal  molt at
 this time  also (330).

 Behavioral Restrictions  -

 Passerines hare highly territorial birds and  so require
 individual cages for  each breeding pair  (182).

 Ecological Role -

 Wrens,  swallows,  thrushes and horned larks are all insec-
 tivores.   Wrens are forest  foragers, swallows and horned
 larks are  denizens of open  country,  and  thrushes  occupy
 both habitats.   All are  preyed upon  by carnivorous mammals
 and predatory birds.

 Longevity  -

 The average life  span for wild birds is  one to three years,
 but passerines  have been known to live 12  years  (331).

 Problems with Mass Culture  -

 Passerines are  territorial  so each pair  must  be kept in
 separate cages  if  breeding  studies are undertaken (182).
 Passerines can  become heavily infected with mites and
 ticks (330).   Swallows are  poor breeders in captivity and
 cannot be  easily maintained for long periods  in the  lab
 (182).

 Toxicity Testing  -

 Birds were dosed by mixing  the toxic substances with their
 food or by loading the food with the substance.   DDT was
 fed and residual  studies  were done (326, 332).  DDT  was
 also used  in  field studies of populations  (333, 334) and
residue  (37,  335,  336, 337).   Loaded food  was used to
 study the  residue  and  pharmacodynamics of  dieldrin (38).
Methoxychlor was fed  in  field and lab residual studies.
                             114

-------
General Suitability •-

Because they require a constant and abundant supply of
insects, they are poor candidates for testing subjects.
The robin is the best candidate among them because of its
distribution and abundance.

Ecological Alternatives -

Vireos, warblers, goatsuckers.
                            115

-------
 Passeriformes-Omnivores
Introduction  -

This  group includes four North American families: Stur^id
 (starling) ,  Corvidae (jays and crows) , Icteridae  (blacr.-
birds)  and Ploceidae (weaver birds) .   Ecologically the;;o
families range  from prairie and open field denizens (inea-
dowlarks)  to early successional and edge species  (grac;- ••••[
cowbirds,  redwings) to late successional woodland (jay3
and crows).   With the exception of the house sparrow
 (Passer domesticus) and the European tree 5;p,irrcw (P.  u.vŁ
tanus), which are both permanent residents, these birds
are all migratory.  Most species are highly territorial
and monogamous,  breeding in loose but discrete colonies
and foraging and roosting in flocks at other times of  I:...-
year.   Many  of  these birds are not protected by the Mi-
gratory Bird Treaty Act and so they are readily available
from  the wild.

Crackles and redwings are usually found around water,
while the  other  members of this group are usually associ-
ated  with  purely terrestrial environments.  Blackbirds
generally  nest  in swampy or marshy areas or wet meadows,
Jays  and crows  usually nest in tree tops and weaver birds
and starlings, who are commensal with man, nest in almost
any available nook or cranny.

Caging/Lab Conditions  -

Because  these passerines  are so diverse in their physical
sizes,  a number  of different cage dimensions are in use.
For the  sparrow-sized members of the  group,  a cage 7 :x  7
x   7 feet will hold 50  to 100 birds indoors  for a four to
six week period  (285).  A cage 2 x 2*2 feet will hole
seven to ten of  these  birds  for three days (285) .   Indivi-
dual test cages  are 6  'x  9  x_  6 inches.   One inch mesh
poultry netting  is used in ail cases.   A community cage
for grackles, red-wing blackbirds and other  blackbirds is
9   x 12  x- 7 feet;  this will house 20 to 70  individuals
(326).  Ten birds  of this  size can be housed in a cage
20  x  15 x 22 inches  (327).   Individual metabolism cages
for these birds  are six inches cubed  (339,  340)  or 9-3/4
!x  7 " x8 inches  (327).   Caging requirements for crow-
sized passerines were not  available.   See Figure  10 and
Figure  11 for cages  and traps used at the Denver Wildlife
Research Center.
                            116

-------

                                       •
                 "aa»-  .'*«*»**,,
            '•; v  -           ,$*••
        1 ^1"$*
                \     -
                            ,

                                             I

  Figure 10.   Starling  and wild  bird  cages.
              Denver Wildlife  Research  Center,
              Denver, Colorado

                   «*


                                           •

                       .

Figure 11.
Wild bird traps - birds trapped
include starlings, sparrows, robins and
crows.  Denver Wild]ifo Research Center,
Denver, Colorado
            117

-------
To stimulate spermatogenesis,  birds  were maintained  on a
15 L:  9D cycle  (328) at  70°  to  80°F (329).

Nutrition -

Pigeon chow checkers  (275)  and chick starter  mash (335)
were used to feed house sparrows.  Hulled  rice  (285,  3^/!
turkey starter crumbs  (326,  340,  341),  chicken  mash  (342
and a cracked corn  and oats mixture  (339)  were  used  to
the smaller blackbirds.   Crows,  bluejays and  ravens  were
fed pigeon chow  checkers  (275).   A suggested  diec for
breeding smaller omnivores  is  a  seed mixture  (75:25:1 -
canary - rape -  thistle)  supplemented with patainine,
collard greens,  lettuce and mealworms (343).  Water  and
food should be given ad libitum.

Nesting food consists of  the  following:  five pounds pou.
cage bird nesting food, two pounds yellow  cornmeal,  10  ':,.
ounces Kretschmer wheatgerm with sugar  and honey, two po::.
ten ounces quick Quaker oats  and one teaspoon iodized sal;
These ingredients are mixed thoroughly  and refrigerated
until used.  To  this is added  dried  crushed wholewheat
bread and hard boiled eggs  as  follows.  Equal volumes of
the first mixture and wheat bread are mixed,  then to ever.
1 1/2 cup of this mixture,  one finely ground  hard boiled
egg and shell is added.   All  this is mixed thoroughly and
enough water is  added to  make  the mixture  crumbly (343).

Breeding and Rearing -

Like other passerines, blackbirds and their allies have
altricial young  that hatch with  their eyes closed (183,
344).  They are  nidicolous  (183).  In general,  passerines
lay two to six eggs per clutch,  have a  one day  laying
interval between eggs, a  13 day  incubation period and a
13 day fledging  period  (215).  The incubation and fledgin
period is longer for jays and  crows. Passerines  usually
rear two clutches per breeding season,  and the  first clut
is generally larger.  Both male  and  female partners  incu-
bate the eggs and feed the young.  Starlings  (Sturnus
vulgaris) have a clutch size  of  four to six eggs, incuba-
takes 12 days and there is  a  21  day  fledging  period  after
hatching (344).  House sparrows  (Passer domesticus)  havf
clutch size of three to six eggs, an 11 day incubation
period and a 14  day fledging period  (345).  They  rear two
to four clutches per breeding  season (March to  September)
(345, 346).
                            118

-------
Redwings (Agelaius phoeniceus)  usually have four eggs per
clutch and fledge 11 days after hatching.  Two clutches
per season is standard (310).  Cowbirds  (Molothrus ater
ater) are completely parasitic, but an egg laying potential
of four to five eggs has been suggested.  Incubation is
believed to take 12 days (310).  Crackles (Quiscalus
quiscula) also lay four to five eggs.  The "Incubation
period is 14 days and the young are fledged 18 days after
hatching (310).

All junenile passerines have a partial postjuvenal molt in
early August and adults have a complete postnuptial molt
a few weeks later (310).  Omnivorous passerines as a whole
are sexually mature and breed at one year of age  (310).

Behavioral Restrictions -

Most of these species are highly.territorial and so re-
quire separate cages for each breeding pair (182).

Ecological Role -

Blackbirds and their allies are omnivores, feeding primarily
on grains, seeds and insects.  All these birds are consi-
dered to be agricultural pests, but cowbirds are really
more beneficial than harmful.  Passerines are food for
mink, weasel, owls, hawks, and falcons.  In addition their
young are often attacked by other species of omnivorous
passerines.

Longevity -

Life expectancy in nature for smaller members of  this  group
of passerines is three years, but they have been known to
live up to 12 years  (331).  The larger members,  such as
the crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos) can live past 20 years of
age  (182).

Problems with Mass Culture -

The house sparrow (Passer domesticus) is a carrier of  St.
Louis encephalitis  (346).  All birds are parasitized by
lice, flies, mites and ticks (310).

Toxicity Testing -

Pesticide studies were undertaken using  a stomach tube and
LDso's were done  (347).  Field applications of pesticides
were used for tissue analysis  (335), eggshell thinning
                            119

-------
studies  (188), and residue  (210).  DDT was given in  loaded
food and necropsy was done  (342).  LD^Q'g were done  on
birds fed mosquito larvicides  (275) and DRC-1339 bait  (3451
LDgs's were conducted on birds  fed strichnine bait  (339).
SC-12937 was fed and physiological and histological  studie;
were undertaken  (328).  A field study on the repellant
power of 4-Aminopyridine was also undertaken  (349).

General Suitability -
                       \
Bluejays are particularly sensitive to toxic substances
(275) .  This group of passerines is fairly easily raised
in captivity (182).  The starling and house sparrow  were
chosen to represent this group  because they are numerous
and not protected by legislation.

Ecological Alternatives -

Most non-grain eating seed-eaters.
                            120

-------
Domestic Galliformes
 Introduction -

This group is comprised of two species: the chicken(Callus)
and the turkey(Meleagris). Both of them have down-covered,
precocial young.  Many different strains of these domesti-
cated birds have been developed for commercial purposes
but the leghorn is probably the best known.  For this
reason, the text that follows will concern itself only
with the leghorn unless otherwise stated.  Chickens, like
all gallinaceous birds, are grain and seed eaters and are
strictly terrestrial in their habits.  They are ground
nesters, but they roost in trees.

Caging Conditions -

A recommended cage for domestic  fowl is  30  x  20  x  8 inches
will house ten  to  50 chicks.  For animals used in experi-
mentation, a pen 15  x 10  x  8 inches will house ten to  50
chicks.  Individual cage  units and brooder facilities are
available commercially.   Shavings, peat  moss or commercial
litter should be used on  the  floor of the cage (289).  A
14L:10D photoperiod should be observed.  Relative humidity
for day-old chicks should be  78  percent, for five-week old
chicks 65 percent, and for adults 45 to  55 percent  (289,
350).  Adult domestic fowl should be kept at a temperature
of 23.9°C  (350).  A restrainer for blood collection  has
been described  in  351.
 A commercial  brand  of  chow was  fed,  food  and water were
 available  ad  libitum ,(289) .

 Breeding/Rearing -

 The chicken has  been domesticated for so  long  that  it no
 longer has a  clutch size;  a  hen lays for  a few months con-
 tinually and  then ceases  for a  few weeks  (352).  Chickens
 have an incubation  period of 21 to 23 days.  They mature
 sexually in 20 to 22 weeks.   At four weeks,  secondary sex
 characteristics  appear and sexing becomes a relatively
 unskilled  job.   Before this  time vent sexing and feather
 sexing are used. There are  two types of  feather sexing -
 growth rate of primaries  and color of feathers.  Both of
 these traits  are sex linked  (352).  One cock can service
 several hens  (352).
                            121

-------
 Special  Needs  -

 A supply of  calcium must be available for good egg laying
 results   (353).  Coarse textured food is preferred over a
 food with fine texture  (354).    Drafts should be  avoided
 and  noise and  excitement should be  kept to a  minimum.   Th<:
 pens should  be kept dry and sudden  changes in temperature
 should also  be avoided  (289).    For the first four to  six
 weeks, temperature control is  most  important.   Chicks
 should be started at 90 to 95  F and gradually decreased
 (approximately 5  per week) to 60 to 65°F  (352).

 Behavioral Restrictions -

 Fowl have cannibalistic tendencies.  To help  eliminate
 these tendencies they can be "debeaked" as young  chicks
 (289,  352)   and the light intensity can be diminished
 (352).

 Ecological Role  -

 Because  they are domesticated  and have been for centuries,
 it is doubtful that these birds can be considered to
 have an  ecological role in the wild.

 Longevity -

 Domestic fowl, like other larger birds, are fairly long-
 lived.   Age  limits have not been definitely established,
 however, as  the  adults are usually  sacrificed after a
 few years (352).

 Problems  with Mass  Culture -

 Fowl are.prone to many parasites and diseases.  Some,  such
 as Newcastle's disease, bronchitis, fowl pox and coccidio-
 sis can  occur  in epidemic proportions unless controlled
 by vaccines  (352).   Other diseases and parasites are
 common but can usually be eliminated without much effort
 or loss  to the flock (352).

Toxicitv  Testing -

 Because  they can be readily supplied and their biology and
 anatomy  are  well-known, chickens are frequently used in
 toxicity testing.   Almost every conceivable route of ex-
 posure has been  used on adults and juveniles.  Injecting
 chemicals into yolk sacs  (355, 356) and studying the
                            122

-------
development of embryos (357) are some of the experiments
done with the eggs themselves.  Ciliary transport studies
(358, 359) and teratological studies have been done (360,
361, 362, 363) along with disease studies (350), enzyme
studies  (364) drug studies  (363, 365, 366, 367), population
dynamics studies  (368, 369, 370, 371), hjstological studies
(372), x-ray morphology studies (373) and stress studies
(374).

Methods of tissue culture  (375, 376) and devices for collec-
tion of excretions (377)  have been developed.  The piezoe-
lectric transducer has also been used in domestic fowl
study (378).

General Suitability -

Chickens are large yet easily handled.  They can readily be
marked for later identification (289).  They are obtainable
in large numbers from commercial breeders on short notice.
They are continuous nesters, so ecological studies could be
carried out year-round.  Chicks can be housed in limited
space fairly cheaply.

Ecological Alternatives -

Jungle fowl, wild turkey.
                             123

-------
Galliformes:  Coturnix coturnix japonica

Introduction -

The Japanese quail was introduced into this country by the
Missouri Department of Conservation in an effort to supple-
ment existing game bird species.  Coturnix are now found in
several states.  It is slightly smaller than the bobwhite
quail in size and far more amenable to laboratory condi-
tions.  Because it is an upland game bird, it is associated
with a terrestrial environment.  Like other gallinaceous
birds, it is diurnal in habits and migratory.

Caging Condi tions -

Several cages have been used in the laboratory testing of
Coturnix.  A frame of 3  x 6  x 1.5 feet covered with 1/2
inch mesh hardware cloth is suitable to house 20 adult
birds (379).  Cages to house 25 brooding birds have a floor
surface area of 69  x 100 cm and a height of 24 cm; three
sides are mesh and a fourth side is sheet metal.  This caae
also serves as a test chamber in behavior studies of
Coturnix (380).  Breeding cages for Coturnix having vari-
able dimensions may be purchased from GOF Mfg. Co., P.O.
Box 8152, Savannah, GA 31402 (381).  Laying, incubation,
and testing cages used at the Denver Wildlife Research
Center are shown in Figures 12, 13, and 14 respectively.

Diurnal light schedules differ.  Some workers recommend a
14L:10D photoperiod  (379, 382, 383, 384); others recommend
an 18L:6D photoperiod (385).  Cages should be kept in an
environment of 60 to 80 percent humidity  (379) .  Temperature
in brooding units should range between 29.3°C to 37.8°C
(380).

Nutrition -

It is common practice to feed Coturnix commercially pre-
pared game bird feed in experimental laboratories.  In some
cases, the birds are given turkey starter ration which is
approximately 22 percent protein (380, 386, 387).  Some
labs place Coturnix on feeding regimes.  An example is
Game Bird Startena  (Purina) for two weeks; then Game Bird
Growena is increasingly mixed with Game Bird Startena until
Growena becomes the exclusive diet of the bird.  After
weeks the young bird's diet consists exclusively of Game
Bird Layena (379, 381).   An oyster shell should be avail-
able to the birds at all times to provide calcium for
                            124

-------



Figure 12.


Coturnix laying cages (l2" x 10" x 16").
Denver Wildlife Research Center,
Federal Center, Denver, Colorado





Figure 13.  Coturnix incubation chamber.
            Denver Wildlife Research Center,
            Denver, Colorado
                        125

-------
                  --


                                           .  ?
                                       1_
                          	
                ...       1 •• '           »«»%'"
                   *Ł- «i^. »'^i*^M*- 7/ * -»•>»' .v '. -  <•  .tiiS^
Figure 14


                             • :
Coturnix  and mourning dove  testing
cages  (10"  x 10" x 12").  Denver
Wildlife  Research Center, Denver,
Colorado
                          126

-------
general good health and for adequate egg development in
females (382, 386).

Food and water should be available at all times because of
the high rate of metabolism of Coturnix (379, 380).

Breeding/Rearing^ -

The natural breeding season for Coturnix is April to Sep-
tember.  A year-round breeding season can be induced in
the lab by providing the birds with the correct lighting
and photoperiod.  Eggs laid by Coturnix required an
incubation period of 16 days + eight hours at a temperature
of 100°F.   It has been found tTha't temperatures above 102°F
are harmful to developing embryos.  For purposes of embryo-
logical study, eggs may be held at 25°C for as long as two
weeks before incubation without damage (388).

Coturnix are born with their eyes open, they are precocial
and nidifugous  (183).

Behavioral Restrictions -

Migratory restlessness occurs from April to September and
birds may damage themselves when they fly against their
cage (379).

Ecological Role -

Japanese quail are seed and granivores primarily although
newly hatched young feed on insects.  They are prey for
predatory birds and carnivorous mammals,

Toxicity Testing -

A wide variety of toxicity testing has been performed on
Coturnix with numerous test substances.  Enzyme assays  (386,
389, 390,  391), egg production and shell characteristic
studies (382, 392), physiological effect studies  (326, 393),
acute toxicity studies  (249), stress studies  (394) and
residue studies ( 392, 395) have been conducted after the
oral administration of DDT and DDE to these birds.  The
effects of oral administration of dieldrin and PCB's have
been evaluated through egg studies  (396), acute studies
(249), and tissue residue studies  (255, 396,  397).  Sleep
studies have been documented after the oral administration
of PCB's and terphenyls  (398).  Reproductive  effects have
been evaluated upon oral administration of Hexachloroben-
zene (399), and physiological and endocrinologic effects
                            127

-------
of Kepon have been evaluated after it was  administered  in
the birds dret  (385) .  Enzymatic effects have been  examined
upon dietary application of Bidrin and Azodrin  (400), and
parathion and guthion  (401).  Coturnix sterility  has been
studied after egg application of Mestranol  (402).   Pesti-
cides have had their effects evaluated, after oral  applicr.-
tion, in physiological testing  (403), sleep  testing (364V
synergistic testing  (293) , behavior testing  (380) ,  and  res:
due testing (404).  A crop-tube method for administering
pesticides for acute toxicity tests has been documented
(199) .  Solitary PCB testing has been performed to  evaluate
liver residue, biological effects, and behavior after oral
administration  (380, 405).  The development  of different
pesticides has dictated acute, subacute, and chronic testn.:
after oral administration of a particular material  (406).

General Suitability -

The Japanese quail is considered a good laboratory  aniiv.ul
because it is hardy, grows rapidly, reaches  sexual  maturity
early, and is a prolific egg producer under  lab conditions
(379, 383, 400, 406, 407).  It also has simple housing
requirements (379, 383, 406, 407), and is considered repre-
sentative of upland game birds  (199, 406).   Research with
these quail has become sophisticated to the  point that
strain numbers have been assigned.

Ecological Alternatives -

Bobwhite quail, ring-necked pheasant.
                            128

-------
Exotics


Introduction -

This group encompasses a wide variety of foreign species
including members of the parrot family, mynahs, and finches.
The most popular and well-known member of the group is the
parakeet or budgerigar. Along with canaries,  mvnahs and cock-
atiels,  it is sold by the thousands as a household pet.
The physical size of these exotic birds is as varied as their
distribution and ecological niches, ranging from the large,
brilliant colored macaws to the almost hummingbird-size
finches.  The bills and claws of these birds  reflect the
peculiar habits each has acquired from evolution.  Many
members of this group are considered to be the most intell-
igent birds in the world.  Parrots, parakeets and mynahs
can be taught to talk, whistle, do tricks and solve problems.
Most of the exotic birds are colonial nesters and are tro-
pical inhabitants.  Many of them are native to Australia,
Africa, Central and South America.

Caging/Lab Conditions -

Standard breeding cages, nest boxes, and next bowls are
available commercially for the smaller members of this
group such as the finches and parakeets.  Lovebirds can use
parakeet cages, but they need larger nest boxes with bigger
holes (408).  Nest material for canaries and  finches can be
bought commercially (408).  Cages for small finches should
be 24 x  12 x  12 inches and at least four feet long for
larger finches.  Perches should be made from twigs or
branches rather than doweling (408).  A suitable nest box
for cockatiels is 9 x  9  x* 15 inches with two to three
inches of coarse sawdust or woodchips on the floor and a
ladder of hardware cloth stapled inside the box from the
entrance hole to the bottom of the box  (408) .  Birds ac-
customed to flying should be housed accordingly  (354).
An alternate method of housing is the aviary.  This should
be eight feet high with four foot high doors, a small
entrance chamber to prevent birds from escaping, and a
shelter of some sort for the birds at one end  (354).
Planted aviaries are best  (408).

Nutrition
Commercial chows are available for all these birds.  Sun-
flower seeds should be used to supplement this diet in seed
eating birds.  Mealworms,  flies, maggots, crickets and
cockroaches have been used to feed the insectivorous
                            129

-------
members  of  this  group (409) .   Water should be kept availe
ble  at all  times with these birds (410).

Breeding and  Rearing -

Lovebirds are sexually distinguishable only by surgery.
They lay three to eight eggs per clutch and have a 23 day
incubation  period.   The young are fledged at seven weeks
 (408).   Parakeets average three to four eggs per clutch
and  can  have  as  many as six eggs per clutch.  They have  ?.;
18 to 23 day  incubation period and the young are f ledger.
at six to nine weeks of age.   Parakeets become sexually
mature at six months and at this time the sexes are fairly
easy to  distinguish (408).   Parakeets will breed year-
round, starting  a new clutch of eggs before the old cluth
is fledged.   In  order to insure quality stock, a pair
should only be allowed to raise three overlapping broods
before they are  given a rest of a month or so (408).
Canaries show no sexual dimorphism,  except that mature (r^l
sing while  females  do not.   They lay three to five eggs  pe
clutch and  breed year-round  (408) .   Some  finches are  sex.oa
dimorphic.  They have the shortest incubation time of exot
birds — only 12 days,  and their young are fledged at two
to three weeks (408) .   Sexes  are distinguishable in cocka-
tiels but their  breeding habits are not well-known.  Mynai
and  parrots show no sexual dimorphism and many species do
not  breed readily in captivity (408).

Special  Needs -

Routine  care  and definite scheduling are  a must for these
birds (213) .   Social birds  should not be  kept in individual
cages if they can still hear  and see members of their own
species  (409) .   Adequate flying space is  a must (354, 409).
Ground foragers  should  be fed on the ground and tree
foragers  should  have their  feeders placed higher (409).
Grit is  essential for all exotic birds along with vitamins
(410).   Parakeets need  iodine in their diet (410).   Parrots
and  parakeets  need  pieces  of  tree branch  to chew on and
keep their  bills trimmed (408).   Lovebirds need a supply
of green twigs for  moisture  for hatching  eggs (408)."

Behavioral  Restrictions  -

Larger birds  such as  parrots  and mynahs  can give nasty
bites.   Lovebirds can only be caged  with  members of their
own  species as they are  vicious  in interspecific encounter:
(408).
                             130

-------
Ecological Role -

These birds feed primarily on seeds, grain or fruit.  When
not kept in check by their natural predators (snakes ancl
carnivorous mammals), they can fnflict serious damage on
agricultural crops.

Longevity -

Larger birds such as mynahs and parrots live 20 years or
longer.  Parakeets have been known to live 12 to 15 years
and the small finches probably live three or four years in
captivity (182).

Problems with Mass Culture -

With the exception of finches, these birds are all very
noisy  (407).  They are extremely messy eaters and sani-
tation can become a problem (182).  The insectivorous
species require a constant supply of live insects (408) .
All are hosts for fleas, ticks, lice and mites (182).

General Suitability -

The smaller birds are easily bred and prolific.  All of
these birds are relatively easy to maintain.  The Aus-
tralian parakeet, or budgerigar, is recommended as a test
species because its initial cost is low and its life
history and diseases are best known in this group.  It is
also the most prolific breeder of the group.
                            131

-------
MAMMALS

Mammals are a homeothermic group of vertebrates  character-
ized by the presence of hair and milk producing  glands.
They are considered by many to be the dominant group of
animals on the earth today.  Man and most of his domestic
animals belong to the class Mammalia and probably for  this
reason our biological knowledge of this class far exceeds
what is known about the rest of the animal world.   This  1"
particularly true in the medically-oriented scientific
disciplines such as physiology.

While most research has been concerned with the  economical-
ly important mammals, other species are valuable to their
ecosystems and have recently received increased  attention.

The following text attempts to consider all mammal groups
in light of present knowledge and to select from each, one
or two species suited for laboratory testing of  the effect-
of chemicals on terrestrial species.  A summary  table
indicating the suitability of various mammal species for
toxicology testing is provided in Table 11..
                             132

-------
TABLE 1]..  SUITABILITY OF WM.S FOR  TOXICOLOGY TESTING







MAMMALS
Shrews
Bats
Vesperti-
lionidae
Phyllosto-
matid
Rabbits and
Hares
Desert
Rodents
Wild rats
Ground
squirrels
and allies
Chipmunks
and allies
Voles and
allies

Deermice and
allies
Lab rats
and mice
Large
herbivores
Large
carnivores

Small
carnivores

Domestic
carnivores
Horse and
allies
Swine and
allies
Sheep and
goats
Deer and
allies
Primates


Opossum


Armadillo

Exotic
species
•fi
r-\
_f)
flj

•H
nj

*
G

F
Ea

E

G
G
G


G

E


E

E

F
P


G


E

E

E

E

G

PC


G


F

E

C
-H
tP-P
C -H
•H >

O 4J
0) a
^ ft
03 U
P

F
F

E

F
E
F


F

E


E

E

G
G


G


E

E

E

E

G

G


G


F

E

ance
U-4 C
C G
.p
G C
in -H

W Ł
F

G
G

E

G
E
G


G

E


E

E

G
G


G


E

G

G

G

G

G


G


F

E

U]
tfl -H
3 -P
O W
•H 0
t»- ^
1)
Vj C

F

P
P

E

P
G
G


F

E


E

E

G
P


G


E

G

E

E

F

G


F


P

E

C
o
-rH
-P
U
-H

4J
tn
a
K
Difficult to
house
Breedability
in captivity
poor



Territoriality

Not social
animals

Not social
animals








Unavailable
in large
numbers
Some very
hard to
keep


large size





large size

long
generation
time
very
susceptahle
to disease
difficult
to house


j?
.-t -.-(
« a
n r3
0) P
C'H
a> 3
O w
F

F
F

E

•F
G
G


F

E


E

Eb

G
P


G


E

G

E

E

G

G


G


F

E

o
•H
tj"
o

o
U
w
B2

B2
D!

D2

DI (C)
C
C


C

D2


DI (C)'

C

Dl-2
A


B-C


C

D2

C

D2

D2

C


c


c

c

O •Ł
C OJ
.p cj .P in
(0 W tr. G
P 0) O -H
•r4 *±4 CJ1 U
.Q iu

De Dipodo-ni/s jrdi
Fo-Gr-Aq A'aotcna li^ijs
Gr Sperr.cpki Ins
beethey I

Fo-Cr FutaTias ^ini'tiis

Fo-Gr Micro tun
per.nsy lyan-izue
.'.'. of Jircfjaat f r
Fo-Gr-De P. rsntV:. .'ur UP

DO Mli? '•lUSu'U t U.S
Sat f us r.crvenic-jf


Fo-Gr '/litre." ;". "r.;«


Fo-Gr- Musi^;.[ "'e . >
Aq-De

Do C.ir.is ''-vi? i .'/'.'s

Do

Do-Gr Miniature swine f^u

Do
OV'.'-p ŁP-

Fo-Gr -'«: j'i<'ua virfii*::-'
0, h;.^ic~.us
Fo-Gr .'.'jinj'rt .;<7!i,.^.?i..>


Fo-Gr i' •:>;.. ;': > .• .:
r ..-iri.ri^;; .-

Fo-Gr ii^if.vr iii- f
no'.'t:r^i j".?i«s


                              133

-------
        TABLE 11  (CONTINUED).   SUITABILITY OF MAIWL:-- FOP: TOXlCOLfl'
Legend:
     General Ecological Role

     A - Large carnivore
     B - Small carnivore
           1.  General
           2.  Insectivore
     C - Omnivore
     D - Herbivore
           1.
           2.
    Seed, fruit eater
    Grass foliage eater
                                        E = Excellent
                                        G = Good
                                        F = Fair
                                        P = Poor
a - Tropical species
    availability is good in  tropi..
b - The suitability of long
    inbred ' (horaozygous) popu-
    Jacions in toxicologies 1
    testing is suspect.
c - No native non-human species
     Habitat Preference
     Fo
     Gr
     De
     Aq
     Do
Forest
Grassland
Desert
Aquatic
Domestic
     Sources:
     - literature cited in text
     - interviews of Scientists
                                     134

-------
Insectivora
Introduction -

Two of eight Insectivora families are represented in North
America:  Soricidae  (shrews) and Talpidae (moles).   There
is little literature on moles and they will not be treated
in detail in this report.   Crandall  (411) gives one ac-
count of a captive Condylura cristata, and two accounts
from other authors for Scalopus aquaticus .   Most of the
seven U.S. mole species are restricted to a few states.
The eastern mole,(Scalopus aquaticus), however, has a large
distribution (34 states); it is found generally east of
the 100th meridian and south of 43° latitude  (412) .  Of  the
27 U.S. species of shrews, three have wide distributions.
Cryptotis parva  [the least shrew (or lesser short-tail
shrew], and Blarina brevicauda  (the short-tail shrew) , are
generally found east of the 100th meridian.  C. parva occurs
in 31 states, mostly south of 43° latitude.  B. brevicauda
occurs in 37 states.  Sorex cinereus is a northern species,
distributed roughly from 40° latitude to the Arctic Ocean.
Identification of shrew species is often difficult and
should be verified  (412).

B. brevicauda, the principal subject of this section, lives
Tn "well wooded.  . . low ground"  (413) , mature beech-maple
forest with abundant leaf litter  (414) , and sometimes in
grasslands  (415).  Like other shrews, it is fossorial, but
not   so completely   as moles.  The short-tail shrew main-
tains two nests, a breeding nest about 2 x 2-3/4 inches
which is lined with grass, whole or broken leaves, and
sometimes mouse fur and a resting nest described as about
the size of a large apple  (413).  Hamilton  (413) found a
dung pile about four inches from a breeding nest and, com-
monly, snail shells in the runways.  Scats are usually
piled on one side of the runway near the nest.

Caging/Lab  Conditions  -

Shrews do well in cages made in a variety of materials and
sizes, plastic  (14 x 18 inches) and glass have been used,
with  cages  made  as small  as  20  x  2  inches  (314, 411,  416).
There is little danger of shrews jumping out of their cage
as mice do.  For example, Blus  (417)  kept shrews  in
2 x 1. x 1 foot  (288 square inches) open-topped aluminum
boxes.  In designing cages, it should be remembered that
Rood  (416) observed the animals frequently licking screen
sides and tops of cages  (without speculating on the cause


                            135

-------
of this behavior) and that Blus  (417)  rejected wire cages
because of the  inadequacy of the substrate.

Shrews are frequently provided with a tin can  (411,  413,  418)
for a nest, but have been forced to sleep in the open, liv-
ing months with no cover and very little soil  (416) .  When
cover, such as  sod, is provided, the shrews use it  (416)
Cotton  (418), leaves, and grass (411,  416,  417)   have been
provided as nest material.  Shrews treat nest materials
in a variety of Ways:  the softer may be placed inside the
rougher; they may be burrowed into  (417) ,  or dragged into
a corner, and they may be ignored when there is a good
layer of soil in the cage where the animal can enlarge one
tunnel for a sleeping chamber  (416).  Two nests are pro-
vided a pair of shrews by Blus  (417),  who also placed a
plywood platform supported by dowel legs above the nest
chamber to support the weight of a water dish and to pro-
vide additional cover.  Usually, captive shrews are sup-
plied with soil - from just enough to cover the bottom of
their cage, to  several inches (411,  416)  - or sphagnum
 (413,  417).   Shrews immediately start to dig in either
substrate, honeycombing it with tunnels  (see 416  for de-
scription of digging behavior)  (417).   Other beddings are
wood shavings  (418  genus unspecified), pine chips (417),
corn cob litter (417),  peat  (417),  grass [(413  genus and
condition unspecified)].  Blus (417)   identifies milled
sphagnum peat moss, three inches deep, as the best substrate.

Rood  (416) and  Blus  (417)  kept the animal room at 70°F.
Doremus  (419) kept the room at an "air-conditioned" 17°C
(referring to temperature, not quality or humidity) and
controlled lighting to "approximate outside conditions"
(probably off-on roughly with sunset-sunrise, ignoring
brightness and  spectrum).  Blus (417)   kept a regimen of 14
hours continuous fluorescent light followed by ten hours
continuous darkness.

Only Hamilton (413)  mentions odor, which he found most pro-
nounced in April, lingering two days after a pair of shrews
had been removed from the room.  No authors have reported
on the method and frequency of cleaning cages.  Some shrews
dropped scats in the sphagnum and the water, and never in
the nest box, and a female with a litter left scats in the
corner of the nest box, rarely venturing from the nest (413).
Blus1  animals usually defecated and urinated in one corner
of the next box, either on or below the surface (417).
                             136

-------
 Nutrition -

 Shrews are very sensitive to  shortages  of  water  and food
 but the amounts required by Blarina  have probably been con-
 fused by experiences with Sorex  '(418) .   Blarina  consumes
 less than one-half their body weight in food every 24 hours
 (416) .  Blus (417) ,   however,  provided  15 to 20g food per day
 per individual.  In  nature, soricids consume earthworms,
 slugs, snails,  insects,  mice,  fungi, berries,  seeds,  and
 greens  (411, 420).   In  captivity, they have survived on
 an array of foodstuffs:   ground  raw  horse  meat,  bone  meal
 with cod liver  oil,  chopped hard-boiled egg,  earthworms,
 mealworms, mice,  diced fruits, greens,  and cottage cheese
 (416).  Additional items are  dead  shrews,  dead birds,
 chicken, canned dog  food, peanuts, crackers,  whole wheat
•bread, cheese  (416).  There is much  individuality in  food
 preferences  (416).  Pearson (421)  fed  a mixture of ham-
 burger, ground  liver, and dry commercial dog food;  Mann
 (418) substituted commercial  dog food for  the meat portion.
 Mann kept shrews up  to 16 months solely on canned dog food,
 starting the animals on  it immediately  upon their arrival.
 Doremus  (419) kept animals on a  basic diet of canned  dog
 food, occasionally supplementing with mealworms  and raw
 beef.  A mixture of  "ground carcasses of laboratory rodents
 (61.3 percent), chicken  heads (15.4  percent),  turkey
 breeder ration  (7.1  percent),  Vionate, a vitamin  supplement
 (0.5 percent}, and bone meal (0.3 percent)" was fed by
 Blus  (417).  Rood  (416) found that  most shrews  readily
 ate dead shrews.   A  shortage  of  food may induce  cannabilism
 in a group  (418) .

 Breeding/Rearing  -

 The most complete description of breeding  captive Blarina
 is that of Blus  (417).   The  average number of young is
 five to seven  (413,   417)  with a range  of  four to ten (413,
 422) .  The peak of breeding activity in nature is in April
 (413, 414, Ithaca, New York)  when  there is maximum testes
 development and captured females have embryos.  In May and
 early June, females  are  nursing.  Breeding is minimal in
 late August and early September  (413,   415) .  Dapson  (414)
 concludes that  breeding  may occur  throughout the year.
 There are probably spring and late summer  litters, and
 occasionally, a vigorous female  produces a third litter
 (413, 415).  Crandall (411) reports  that E. P. Walker had
 a  captive Cryptotis  garva female which  produced  66 young
 in one year. Some individuals breed one or two  months after
 birth (414,  423).  As a  rule,  males  with testes  greater than
 5 by 7 mm have sperm  in the cauda epididymis if the acces-
 sory reproductive glands are  developed   (414). The

                              137

-------
 gestation  period  is21 to 28 days (413).  Hamilton (422)  be-
 lieves post-partum  estrus  is  normal  for  wild Blarina, as
 well  as  for  Sorex fumeus and  S_.  cinereus.

 The development of  the newborn  shrew has been described in
 detail by  Hamilton  (413).   At birth,  the shrews  are  dark
 pink  and the size of  a honeybee.  A  wild female  was  ob-
 served moving each  of her  young (about nine  days old) by
 the belly  when the  nest was disturbed in the wild.   By  13
 days, shrews weigh  about  9 g;  mammae are  visible on the
 females; the ears are open; the side glands  are  obscured;
 the mid-ventral bare  patch is prominent.   Litters have  been
 kept  together up  to one month following  weaning   (417).

 Special  Needs -

 Shrews are very sensitive  to  food and water  shortages and
 require continuous  supplies of  both.

 Behavioral Restrictions -

 The greatest concerns in maintaining shrews  in captivity
 are their  voracious appetites and pugnacious behavior,  both
 over-rated.   Although Blair (415)  found  that Blarina are  no'
 territorial,  most researchers keep shrews  in individual
 cages except when pair are mated  (417).    Shrews pair for
 very  long  times in  the wild,  perhaps  for life, and parents
 may stay together until  the young are born (413). Rood
 (416) describes the behavior  of captive  shrews in various
 combinations and  as strange animals  are  introduced.   Indi-
 viduals are  marked  with  #1 bird bands on the hind legs (416)
 or by toe-clipping  (415, 424).  Playful  pushing  and  snug-
 gling occurs among  a  few individuals  living  together with
 a minimum  of quarrel  (416) .   The important factor is the
 disposition  of the  individuals  involved, with age and sex
 only secondarily  important.   Rood  (416)  doubts that  Blarina
 are "as solitary  as is generally believed."

 Ecological Role -

 Shrews are energetic  predators  in the ecosystem,  consuming
quantities of earthworms,  snails, and slugs,  various in-
 sects, and mice.  The  role  of shrews  in  controlling  mice
has been disputed and  probably  depends on  the local  popula-
 tion as well  as individual differences  (416).
                            138

-------
 Longevity  -

The longevity record for Blarina brevicauda may well be that
established at the National Zoological P'ark of two years,
three months, and one day  (411).  Life expectancy in nature
is 20 months (414).   The age to toothwear relationship is
curvilinear (414).

 Problems with  Mass  Culture  -

No diseases have been identified for Blarina (413).

 Toxicity Testing -

Shrews have not been used much as subjects for toxicity test-
ina except in field studies where lead content was analyzed
 (425).

 General Suitability -

Blarina has had previous maintenance work completed (416,
 417) , and  is of a suitable size to be easily housed in
relatively small cages.   Its voracious appetite and
abundance  in nature makes Blarina a good candidate for use
in toxicological testing.

 Ecological Alternatives -

Other shrews, moles.
                             139

-------
Chiroptera


Introduction -

Bats  (Chiroptera) are  the only mammals capable of  true
flight.  Almost all North American bats  (about: 30  species)
are members of the family Vespertilionidae, and are
nocturnal, insectivorous, and weigh no nore than a fraction
of an ounce.  During the day they roost  in various types
of shelters including  caves, attics, trees, and old mine
tunnels  (412).   Some  species are migratory, changing
their range with the seasons and availability of insects.
Other bats hibernate in caves and buildings during the win-
ter.  Four Phyllostomidae are found in the southwestern
United States and feed on pollen and nectar.  Six  species
of Molossidae occur in the United States and are primarily
insectivorous.

Caging/Lab Conditions  -

Because of the small size of bats, many  different  cage en-
closures have been successfully used. A  20 "x  ^J x 25 cm
cage was used to house 12 individuals.   A wood-wire mesh
structure 80  x  92  x  128 cm, with a roostinq box 80 x  92 x-
51 cm was used to house a bat colony of  unknown size (426).
Bats have been individually housed in pint ice cream con-
tainers with wire mesh lids (427), and in battery  jars
15 cm wide and 20 cm high (428).  All types of materials -
wood, metals, etc. can be used for cages.

Sanitation of cage facilities seems to be the major dif-
ficulty in the maintenance of bats.  Overcrowding  leads to
sanitation problems and much time is spent cleaning the
cages C428, 429, 430).    Paper on the bottom of the cages
should be changed daily (431).

Because bats are nocturnal, they require dim light for feed-
ing.  Other special needs include room to exercise or to
fly (431) ,  chitin in  their diets (428) , and water made
available in such a way that bats can readily find it.
High relative humidity (71-81 percent) and high ambient
temperatures  (78-84°F) increase their activity and facili-
tate the feeding process (427, 428, 432) .  The use of
light bulbs to provide local heat is a common practice
(427).
                             140

-------
A photoperiod of 13L:11D, a 21-28°C temperature range, and
a relative humidity of 55-92 percent, have proven effective
in maintaining Phyllostomid colonies  (426).

Nutrition -

Eats eat a great variety of foods in captivity.  One elabo-
rate diet consists of hard-boiled egg yolk, dry cottage
cheese, ripe banana, live mealworms, six drops of liver
extract with iron, six drops of wheat germ oil, and three
gms of milti-vitamin preparation, all mixed in a blender.
If desired, it can be frozen.  This preparation is given
ad_ libitum  (428) .  Insects are a necessary component of tne
diet of insectivores because the chitin aids the formation
of fecal pellets  (428).

Successful diets for Phyllostomids include young birds, in-
sects, raw beef, banana  (433), cereal, wheat germ, milk,
powder, protein and mineral supplements, corn oil mixture
in a fruit base (426, 429).    Mealworms are used widely
as a staple food for bats in captivity  (434).

Breeding/Rearing -

North American bats do not usually breed in captivity  (431).
In nature copulation takes place in  late autumn and birth
in spring.  The sperm is stored for  several months in  the
body of the female  (429, 433).

Gestation lasts 56-100 days in Corynorhinus   (435) and is
rather variable in many  species.  Usually only one or  two
young are produced each  year (429).   There have been  a
number of tropical bats  maintained in captivity with mixed
breeding success  (436).

Behavioral Restrictions  -

One drawback to keeping  bats, since  bats  usually forage  on
the wing, is that they must be conditioned  to  feed in  cages
from the food source  (see  427 for a thorough  description
of techniques).  North American bats are  hibernators  and at
roost they  assume the temperature of their  immediate  en-
vironment.  If  temperatures  are  low  enough  they will  enter
into a semi-torporous state  every day.  The seasonal  hiber-
nation pattern  conflicts with long-term physiological
experiments and many  researchers  have resorted to  tropical
species which do  not  hibernate (434).
                             141

-------
 Ecological Role -

 The bats of North America are primarily insectivores feed-
 ing entirely on airborne species.   Bats are known to loca:e
 their prey by means of ultra-sound and navigate with ease ir
 the absence of light.   Their ecological role is not fully
 understood.

 The leaf-nose bats, Phyllostomidae, feed in part on pollen
 and nectar, acting as  pollinators  of certain angiosperms
 specifically adapted to their visitations.

 Longevity -

 For Mexican free-tailed bats,(Tadarida brasiliensis),  the
 life span is greater than 4.5 years in captivity.   Pacific
 pallid bats have lived to eight years , three months and cer-
 tain Desmodontidae average five to six years  (433).

 Toxicity Testing -

 Bats are rather unusual members of the laboratory world.
 Myotis lucifugus has been used for taste reception work
 '(437) , and  the Mexican free-tailed bat  (Tadarida brasilien-
 sis)  (427)  for metabolic versus temperature studies.

 The little  brown bat  fay otis  lucifugus), has been shown to bn
 highly sensitive to DDT  (438) and  studies have been used
 also for the  effects of ethyl alcohol  on subcutaneous
 microcirculation (439).

 General  Suitability -

 Most species  of North  American bats are not plentiful
 enough to withstand large harvests to  stock lab colonies.
 The  possibilities  for  breeding in  captivity are relatively
 unknown.  This,  added  to the  seasonal  activity changes of
 temperate-region species,  makes them poor subjects  for wide
 use  in toxicity testing.   Tropical species  have a wide
 range of ecological niches and may be  better test  subjects
 (434).

 If a North American species is  chosen  to begin lab  breeding/
rearing work,  Eptesicus  fuscus,  because of  its large size,
 is recommended (434).

 Ecological  Alternatives -

Other bats, insectivorous  animals,  (wrens,  shrews).
                            142

-------
Lagomorpha            * "


In troduc t i o n -

The Lagomorphs are composed of tv/o families, the rabbits and
hares (Leporidae) and the pikas (Ochotor.idae) .   Though they
resemble the rodents, there is good evidence that they have
been separately evolving for a very long time in terms of
mammalian history.

Rabbits  (Sylvilagus) and hares  (Lepus) have long ears
and long hind legs modified for saltatorial locomotion.  In
warmer climates, they are carriers of tularemia.  There are
about 15 native species that are basically openland-edge
animals.  The largest hares are about 26 inches long and
weiqh up to 12 pounds.  Leporids are basically herbivorous
(412).

Pikas, Qchotona, are inhabitants of talus slopes in the
Northern and Central Rockies.  There are only two native
species of this smaller, rat-sized, tail-less animal.  They
store food in hay piles and feed almost entirely on grasses
and herbs  (412) ..

In research, the domestic New Zealand white rabbit,
Oryctolagus cuniculus, is utilized almost exclusively, and
the following comments refer to this species unless other-
wise stated.  They weigh from nine to 14 pounds and are
very gentle lab animals  (289).

Caging/Lab Conditions -

Recommended cages for New Zealand white males are 30 x 18 x
18 inches, which are  also sufficient for a breeding aiea.
Does with litters need larger enclosures  (30  x~  36  x  18
inches)  and a nest box, 18! x 9. xr 7 inches, with fresh straw
bedding.  Temperatures from 65-75°F are suitable and rela-
tive humidity of 50  percent is ideal, but not a necessity.
A 14L:10D photoperiod is recommended.  Drafts should be
avoided  (289).

A breeding pair of European hares,  (Lepus europaeus) were
successfully housed  in an  8  x  6  x  8 foot "brick"", outdoor
enclosure with a concrete floor and a wire front which was
covered in winter.   One-half of the floor was covered with
straw (440) .
                            143

-------
 Snowshoe hares have been kept in captivity.  One-half inch
 wire cloth  flooring is suggested as a deterrent to the
 spread of coccidiosis, a perennial problem with this species,
 This cage alteration  increased survival of new born rabbits
 from 11.6 percent  (when they were born on the ground) to
 63.3 percent  (441).

 For handling  lab rabbits the restraint device described in
 reference 442 has proven very effective.

 Nutrition -

 Commercial  rabbit pellets are available, but many labs
 supplement  the diet with greens, raw vegetables, hay,
 and oats  (441).  Adults should receive four to six ounces
 of food daily, pregnant females six to eight, and lactating
 does eight  to 16 ounces.  Growing juveniles need from one
 to two pounds per diem  (289) . .  Pikas have been maintained
 on lettuce, cabbage,  raw potatoes, dandelions, grass, oat-
 meal, and bread  (441).  Lagomorphs are coprophagus and
 apparently  obtain some nutritional benefit from this habit
 (443).   Water should be supplied ad libitum to all species.

 Growth of suckling rabbits has been shown to increase faster
 in creep-fed  individuals than in those reared naturally
 (444).   Creep-feeding is the practice of self-feeding
 concentrates  to young suckling animals in a separate en-
 closure away  from mothers.  The composition of one experi-
 mental creep-feed diet is shown on Table 12.

 Breeding/Rearing -

 Domestic rabbits and many wild Lagomorphs are polyestrous.
 The gestation period  for New Zealand whites is 30-32 days,
 litter size varies from one to 18 with an average of eight,
 the young are weaned in eight weeks and both males and
 females can breed approximately six months from birth.
 Females can be rebred about 35 days after parturition.  The
 breeding life of females and males is one to three years.
 One buck can  service six to ten females in a breeding
 colony.  Pair mating is recommended in the buck's cage (289) •

European hares have a 42-day gestation period, snowshoe
hares 37 days, and pikas 32 days.  There has been some suc-
 cess breeding pikas in captivity  (441).

 In the wild,  cottontails  (Sylvilagus  floridanus) gestate
 for 27 to 30  days, and produce three to five litters per
 annum.   The number of young per litter is four to seven
 (412).


                            144

-------
               Table 12.  COMPOSITION OF AN EXPERIMENTAL CREEP-FEED*
Protein, 22 percent; fat, 5 percent; fiber, 13.4 percent
Ingredients:  Dehydrated alfalfa meal, soybean meal, oats, red wheat bran, distillers
              dried corn solubles, skimmed milk, salt, anise oil powder, vitamin A,
              balance of trace minerals, vitamin pre-mix, and vegetable fat or oil.
Mixing Formula;

   Dehydrated Alfalfa Meal
   Soybean Meal (expeller)
   Oats
   Red Wheat Bran
   Distillers Dried Corn Solubles
   Skimmed Milk
   Vegetable Fat or Oil
   Salt  (NaCl)
   Vitamin Pre-mix
   Anise Oil Powder
   Trace Minerals
   Vitamin A
Percent
Of Total
  37.5%
  10.0
  10.0
  15.0
  13.5
  11.5
   1.25
   0.5
                                                100%
Pounds
Per Ton
 750
 200
 200
 300
 270
 230
  25
  10
   7.5
   4.5
   2
   1
            2,000  pounds
*Feed was a crumble in Trial 1 and pelleted at 3/32" diameter in Trial  2.   Also,  in
Trial 2, the formula was modified slightly by Albers Milling Company.   Essentially,
the modification was to increase the level of protein and reduce the level  of  fat.
SOURCE:   (444).

-------
Behavioral Restrictions -

The restrictions associated with maintaining domestic rab-
bits are very minor.  Wild species may have some difficulty
adjusting to caging.  Frequently the cage elicits an escape
response which sends the animal nose first into the wall of
the cage, often with sufficient force to cause self-injury
(441).

Pikas are very territorial creatures in their natural en-
vironment.  This behavior may restrict attempts to cage a
number of-them.

Ecological Role -

Rabbits and hares are primarily herbivorous, utilizing many
plant foods, but preferring grasses and herbaceous materials
(412).   They are typically openland-edge inhabitants and
remain active year round (443).   Pikas have similar food
habits and are easily detectable on the talus slopes where
they live because of the "hay" piles they build in the fall
as storage heaps (412).

All Lagomorphs are desirable prey for larger predaceous
birds and mammals.

Longevity -

In captivity, eastern cottontails have lived to five years
and European hares to 11 years of age (441).

Problems with Mass Culture -

Rabbits and hares are quite susceptible to a variety of ills,
particularly coccidiosis which is highly communicable and
causes high infant mortality when it occurs (441) .

Toxicity Testing -

Domestic rabbits are a rather popular subject in American
laboratories because of their gentleness and in some cases/
their relatively large size.  They have been used in many
types of toxicity experiments, particularly those testing
dermal reaction where the substance is directly applied to
the shaved skin (445, 446,  447, 448, 449, 450, 451).  Other
routes of exposure are also utilized with a great variety
of substances.   Work with wild species is limited to a few
pesticide studies of free roaming subjects (452).
                             146

-------
General Suitability -

Domestic rabbits are readily available and easy to use in
toxicity testing.  The applicability of such work to natural
populations is difficult to judge.

Wild species, particularly the eastern cottontail (Syl-
vilagus floridanus) and a western species  (S.'auduboni)
are available and should prove adaptable to laboratory
conditions.

Ecological Alternatives -

Woodchucks, nutria.
                            147

-------
 Rodentia:   Heteromyidae


 Introduction -

 The  Heteromyidae,  the  family of kangaroo rats,and  pocket
 mice,  are  found  in the southwestern United States  and in
 Mexico.  They are  specially adapted to desert habitats.
 They have  fur-lined cheek pouches.  The large forms have
 modified rear limbs for  leaping and very long tails used
 for  balance.  All  Heteromyids are nocturnal.  There are
 more than  20  species of  pocket mice, one kangaroo  mouse,
 and  14 species of  kangaroo rat in North America.   The rats
 are  the largest, with  four to eight inch bodies and weigh-
 ing  from two  to  five ounces.  Pocket mice are similar to
 laboratory mice  in size.

 Caging/Lab Conditions  -

 For  the kangaroo rats  (Dipodomys) glass front metal cages,
 2x2x3  feet with dried leaves for a floor and a small
 shelter, have been  used.  A quantity of sand was supplied
 and  used by the rats for cleaning their pelage  (453).
 Other cages,  10 x  11 x 16 inches ( 3 x 4 m) are also
 adequate,  but for  breeding a larger enclosure, 5x7x2
 feet, is recommended.  Shelters, such as small boxes or
 mailing tubes and  a sand substrate are also desirable
 (454).


Pocket mice (Perognathus) were routinely housed in 12 * 12
 x 12 cm cages with  sand bottoms  (455).  It was found that
 the pocket mouse (P. flavus)  tolerates physiological stresses
very well  such as sound,  heat, vibration, and G forces (456)-

 The  Heteromyids/ though desert forms, are greatly  affected
 by exceedingly high or low ambient temperatures  (457) and
 should be  protected from them.

 Nutrition  -

 Kangaroo rats were  fed a diet of 26 percent rolled oats, 25
 percent rolled barley, 20 percent meat meal, 10 percent
 powdered milk, 11  percent whole wheat kernel, 2 percent
 cod  liver  oil, 2 percent sunflower seeds, and traces of
 birdseed,  salt, powdered calcium carbonate.  Lettuce was
 provided every other day.  They seemed to do equally well
 on just barley, sunflower seeds, and lettuce (454).
                            148

-------
Pocket mice have been successfully nourished for seven
years on mixed seeds alone  (453).  A more varied diet in-
cluded dog food, greens, and vegetables  (453).  Desert
rodents may need green vegetation to induce breeding in the
spring.

The water requirement of heteromyids is negligible in the
laboratory; even when water is made available, they do not
drink it  (453) .

Breeding/Rearing -'

Heteromyids are very territorial and will usually destroy
each other when two or more are caged together.  Increased
cage size may improve the success of co-habitation  (455,
458).   In one case, individual kangaroo rats were .kept
separate until estrous and then a pair were placed together
in a neutral cage, 30 x 30 x 10 inches.  This resulted in
pregnancy in six of ten females (459).  Successful lab
breeding is recorded for D_. ordii, D. merriami, and
D_._ deserti in large rooms  (453) .  Some success at group liv-
ing has been reported for the, Fresno kangaroo rat, D_._
nitratoides, but only in large cages with rather violent
initial skirmishes (453).

All heteromyid rodents are seasonally polyestrous.  The ges-
tation period in captivity for Dipodomys is 29 to 32 days
and varies little from one species to another  (453).
Young of D. merriami and p_._ deserti were weaned at 22 to 25
days and were fully mature at 90 days.  Sex of the young can
be determined after 11 days (454).   The number of young 'per
litter for Dipodomys is two to four  (459).

Behavioral Restrictions^ -

Though heteromyids are nocturnal, some specimens have over-
come this habit in the lab.  Under red light, these rodents
have been quite active  (453).

Kangaroo rats are very easy to handle and are essentially
very gentle creatures   (453).  However, because of their
territorial instinct, communal caging may not be possible,
with the exception of a few species.

Ecological Role -

Desert heteromyid rodents are primarily seed eaters and
serve as food for many predators.  They are particularly
important in snake diets.
                            149

-------
Longevity -

In captivity, the life span  of various pocket mice
(Perognathus) differs from four years  (P . pqryus) to seven
years (P. longimembris) to eight years TP. fallax)  (453).
Their mortality in nature is much higher as would be ex-
pected.

Toxicity Testing -

Because of the unique fashion in which these desert rodenc;
metabolize water, their physiology has been rather well
studied.  Some blood work has been done for kangaroo rats
(454).

The effects of psychomimetics like LSD-25 and psilocybin
have been studied as has the uptake of l!31 in the thyroid
of D. merriami (454).   Kangaroo rats have also been used
in a~field study on the effect of a rodenticide  (Gophacide)
(460). They seem very suitable for these experiments.

General Suitability -

Kangaroo rats and pocket mice are gentle laboratory sub-
jects and would make good species for  use in experiments.
However, the difficulty of breeding them in captivity de-
tracts from their suitability.

Ecological Alternatives -

Other rats, mice.
                            150

-------
Rodentia:  Cricetidae, Muridae - Wild Rats
Introduction -'

The wild rats of North America are from two rodent families,
the Cricetidae and the Muridae, and four genera,  Rattus,
Neotoma, Sigmodon, and Oryzomys.  Members of all  four have
been used in some way in the laboratory.

Neotoma, the woodrats or packrats, is a widespread genus
ranging from the east coast forests to the deserts of the
west.  There are eight species, all easily distinguished  by
their hairy tails.

Sigmodon, the cotton rats, are represented by S.  hispidus,
which is abundant in grassland habitats throughout the
southern U. S.  Two minor species are found in the foothills
of northern Mexico, southern Arizona, and New Mexico.

Oryzomys palustris, the rice rat, occurs in marshy areas  in
the southeastern U. S.  It is a semi-aquatic species that
usually nests under debris above high-water level.

The Rattus  species have been introduced by man and are
adapted to living in and around man-made structures, parti-
cularly where food is stored.

Rattus and Neotoma weigh about six to 12 ounces and their
body length is from seven to nine inches.  Sigmodon and
Oryzomys are smaller weighing between two and six ounces
and measuring between four to seven inches in body length
 (412).   All have long tails, are typically rodent-like in
appearance, nocturnal, and omnivorous.  They are relatively
abundant locally within their ranges.

The multimammate mouse  (Rattus  natalensis) , an African wild
rodent, has been introduced to  the U. S. for laboratory
testing and is laboratory-adapted  (461).

Caging/Lab Conditions -

Wire mesh, glass, and sheet metal are acceptable materials
for cages  (453, 462).   Wooden  enclosures  should be avoided.
The dimensions of cages in use  range from  27 x 37 x 34
inches for a  mesh cage with a  galvanized  removab]e floor
tray, to 16 x  15 x 15 inches for  a sheet metal cage with
a wire mesh door  (463) .  A 3 x  8  x 35 foot  enclosure with
                            151

-------
  28 compartments  has  been used  to house  a  colony  of wild t
  (462).   Nesting materials  such  as  cotton,  excelsior, and
  twigs  are necessary  (464, 465)   as are nest boxes  (453,
  463) .

  Conditions under which Central American cotton rats
  Sigmodon, were successfully maintained  in a lab  are 15 to
  16 C,  75  to  80 percent relative  humidity, and 24 hours of
  light  per day  (466) .

  Male rice rats were  kept  in a  common enclosure while ferna]-
  were housed  individually  and no  serious confrontations or""
  fights were  reported (467).

  Nutrition -

  The rice rat has been successfully maintained on a diet
  of small grains, whole or rolled oats, greens, fruit and  re-
 vegetables, plus dog food fortified with cod liver oil (453
  468) .

 Recommended diets for Neotoma floridana include carrots
 sunflower seeds,  peanuts, stale bread, tomatoes,  oatflakes,
 berries, hard and fresh corn (463, 464).

 Cotton  rats have been fed combination diets  of sunflower
 seeds,  whole  wheat, oatmeal, cod liver oil,  corn, and pow-
 dered protein (meat scrap) with periodic greens  and apple
 or  tomato supplements (463).

 Diets for Rattus   are not available, but it  is  likely that
 combinations  of the above would prove suitable because  the
 feeding habits of all the wild  rats  are  comparable.

 Water should  be provided  ad  libitum  for  all  wild  rats.

  Breeding/Rearing -

 The breeding  and  rearing  characteristics of  the wild rats
 are summarized in Table  13.

  Behavioral Restrictions  -

Researchers who have  kept  Sigmodon hispidus, the  cotton rat,
report  that cage mates are likely to  fight, and that the
cotton rats do not  tame easily  or lend themselves to han-
dling (453, 463).   Rice rats are docile and handle easily
 (469).  The eastern woodrat  (Neotoma floridana) fight when
caged in numbers, but usually becomes habituated  to others
and ceases hostilities  (464).   Wild populations are


                            152

-------
              Table  13.   BREEDING AND REARING CHARACTERISTICS OF THE WILD RATS
     Group

     Siqmodon
      (463,  470)
Litters/
 Years

  3-6
Gestation
27 days
                    Young/   Age at
Time of Estrous*    Litter   Maturity
  Feb. to Nov.
3-6      50 days
      Rattus
      (412,  467)
  12
21-22 days       Year-round
                     8-10     90 days
U1
U)
      Neotoma
      (464,  465,  471,
      472,  473)
            30-36 days       March to Nov.       3-4
                                             60-90
                                             days
      Oryzomys
     (467,  468)
            25 days
                 Feb. to Oct.
                     3-4      50 days
      *The wild rats are polyestrous in captivity,

-------
 somewhat colonial  and should adapt well to lab  conditions.
 Species  of  Rattus  which have been bred for laboratory
 animals, will be treated elsewhere.

 Ecological  Role  -

 All wild rats are  ominivorous.   The woodrats  (Neotoma)  and
 Old World rats (Rattus)  feed more on  animals  than the cot-
 ton rats (Sigmodon) and rice  rats (Oryzomys) which favor
 green vegetation (412).

 All wild rats are  potential  and often valuable  sources of
 food for predatory snakes, birds, and mammals (412).
 Sigmodon hispidus  affects grassland bird populations  by
 eating eggs and  are agricultural pests in certain areas
 (463).

 Longevi ty -

 Desert woodrats, Neotoma lepida,  have lived over  five years
 in captivity and the other species of wild rats probably
 are capable of rather long lives in captivity (412).

 Problems with Mass  Culture -

 Woodrats  have a  musky odor that may become rather unpleasant
 to lab workers  (465)  and are very suitable hosts for fleas,
 mites, etc.   Care  should be  taken to  eliminate  parasites
 from new individuals received from natural populations
 (471, 474).

 Toxicity Testing -

 The genus Rattus has been used  extensively to determine the
 feasibility of using U-5897,  a  male chemosterilant, to
 control pest populations of  wild  rats.   Single  oral doses
 ranging  from 0 to  300 mg/kg  were  administered to  males of
 four species  of Rattus with  mixed results (475, 476).

 Other rodenticide  studies have  employed Norway  and Black
 rats with a variety of administration methods,  primarily
 forced ingestion of food additives  (477,  478, 479).

General Suitability  -

The suitability of  wild rats  for  lab  research is  good due
to their ability to  reproduce in  large  numbers, their
small size, and their relatively  inexpensive  diets.
Oryzomys palustris  is recommended by  labs that  use it (469)-
                            154

-------
Ecological Alternatives -

Cotton rat alternatives include voles, Microtus,  and rice
rat (412).                             	

The eastern woodrat could be replaced by other woodrats and
by the Norway and Black rat (412).

The rice rat alternatives are the Norway rat, packrat, and
cotton rat  (412) .

The genera of the wild rats are somewhat ecologically inter-
changeable .
                            155

-------
Rodentia:   Sciuridae  - Ground  Squirrels


Introduction  -

Ground  squirrels  (Spermophilus,  Ammospermophilus) ,  are ro-
dents that  inhabit openlands of  many types and are  limited
to  the  midwestern  and plains region of North America.   The
are diurnal,  burrow dwellers,  and hibernate during  adverse
seasons.  Their average  body length is five to ten  inches,
and they possess long furry  tails.   Adult body weights in
this group  range from six to 38  ounces (144).

Caging/Lab Conditions -

Wooden  cages  will  be  gnawed  through by ground squirrels
(453).   However, 12 cubic feet packing crates surrounded
with wire mesh with a sand floor have served as suitable
housing (480).   Metal suspension cages  from four to ten
cubic feet  have been  used (481)  .   Litter composed  of  pine
shavings and  burlap sacking  has  been used (481).

The  California ground squirrel,  Spermophilus beecheyi  ,
has  been housed and bred in  4  x  8 x 2 feet enclosures  of
1/2  x 1 foot  welded wire.  A nest box, 12 x 12 x 12 inches
should  be included (481).

Nutrition -

Ground  squirrels are  omnivorous  and have  been successfully
sustained on  combinations  of seeds,  greens,  fresh vege-
tables, dog food,  raw meat,  bone meal, and cod-liver oil
(853).  Purina lab show  has  proven  adequate for Spermophilus
(=Citellus) parryi (480).    Ground  squirrels like to
hoard food  in nest boxes even  if it is supplied a<5  lib it urn
and  the nest  boxes should  be cleaned daily (482).

Breeding/Rearing -

The  gestation period  for the Columbian ground squirrel
(Spermophilus columbianus) is  24 days  (453).   The young of
the  thirteen-lined ground  squirrel  ( S. tridecemlineatus)
are weaned at 30 days, but those of  the spotted ground
squirrel (s .  spilosoma)   are  not  weaned until  about  48  days
after birth (483).
                            156

-------
Various ground squirrels have been bred successfully in
captivity, including the golden-mantled ground squirrel,
ftmmospermophilus lateralis)  the antelope squirrel ( A_._
leucurus)for three generations, the Columbian ground
squirrel (S. columbianus) the thirteen-lined ground squirrel,
S. tridecemlineatus  (453) , and S_._ beechayii  (481) .  Green
vegetable material  (i.e., lettuce) given before spring
breeding (60 to 70 g per day) may influence the reproductive
performance in ground squirrels (481).

Behavioral Restrictions -

Ground squirrels are solitary in nature and present problems
when confined in small areas.  When housed together they
fight, except for a  few weeks during the breeding season
(484).   The arctic  ground squirrel  S^ parryi  is canniba-
listic in captivity  (480) and there is evidence that other
species will eat their young when caged (484) .    While
single individuals adapt well to cage living, they do not
become docile and cannot be handled easily.  Ammospermo-
philus from the Mojave Desert makes a good cage squirrel
and becomes fairly domesticated (485).

Ecological Role -

Ground squirrels are primarily herbivores though certain
species rely heavily on insects during dry seasons in arid
habitats.  They are  a food source for raptors and large
carnivorous mammals.

Longevity -

The life span of ground squirrels in nature is quite vari-
able, but in captivity they have been known to live up  to
eight years (453) .

Toxicological Testing -

Bishydroxycoumarin  has been successfully administered to the
California ground squirrel via an oral administration tube
and later assayed from liver and fecal samples.   A dose of
20 mg/kg body weight was given every  24 hours to  adult
squirrels.  Differences  in plasma dicoumarol were reported,
the concentration depending on differences in diet (486) .
                             157

-------
 General  Suitability -

There are problems with breeding wild caught ground squir-
rels.  Successes with S. beecheyi  are encouraging and makes
this species a prime choice for future use.

 Ecological  Alternatives -

Chipmunks ,  prairie  dogs.
                           158

-------
Rodentia; Scuridae - Chipmunks and Squirrels
Introduction -

The chipmunks are rodents of the squirrel family and closely
related to ground dwelling squirrels.  There is one species
common throughout eastern North America, Tamias, and six-
teen western species, Eutamias.  They are from three to
seven inches in length, excluding their long, furry tails.
They weigh from two to five ounces, the eastern chipmunk
being larger than the western forms.

Chipmunks occur in all types of habitats from woodlands in
eastern North America to rocky slopes, high deserts and
conifer scrubland in the Rockies.  They are diurnal, pri-
marily ground dwellers, and omnivorous although they can
exist for long periods on seeds alone.

These small squirrel-like creatures are very active and
alert.  They require facilities with adequate room for
exercise.

Tree squirrels  (Sciu.rus , Tamia sciurus)  and flying
squirrels  (Glaucomys) are well studied in the wildlife
literature, but there appears to be very little maintenance
information available.

Caging/Lab Conditions  -

Glass or metal cages 2x2 feet with tops of fine wire
mesh have been successfully used to house chipmunks in the
lab.  A substrate  of dead leaves or another adequate
substance  should be used  (453).  An exercise wheel would
probably increase the acceptability of the enclosure.

Nutrition -

Chipmunks are omnivorous, but feed mainly on fruits, nuts,
seeds, and invertebrates.  Their natural diets conform to
the seasonal availability of foods.  In the laboratory,
mixtures of seeds  (canary and sunflower) with fresh greens,
fruits, chopped raw meat and cod liver oil have been
successful diets  (453).  The average daily water intake for
Tamias is about 33 ml.  (487), and  it has been found that
Eutamias need less water per gm of body weight than its
eastern cousin  (488) .
                             159

-------
 Tree squirrels are primarily consumers of nuts and these
 dietary items are suggested as food for captive indi-
 viduals (489).

Breeding/Rearing -

 Chipmunks  are not readily bred in captivity, but the long-
 eared chipmunk (Eutamias quadrimaculatus) has been success-
 fully bred in a large, screened, outdoor cage in Californis
 (453).  Pregnant females brought into a lab may eat their
 young  (487)  or refuse to care for them  (490).

 The gestation period is 31 .days for all chipmunks.  Tamias
 striatus produces two litters each year of four to six
 young each    (491), while Eutamias breed but once in the
 spring and average five young per litter  (490) .

 The gestation period in Sciurus is about 44 days, in
 Tamiasciurus about 38 days, and for Glaucomys about 40
 days.They all breed once a ye at and give birth in late
 spring or  early summer.  The number of young varies from
 two to eight  (412).   There is little known about captive
 breeding in these genera.

 Behavioral Restrictions -

 Because chipmunks and other squirrels are solitary in
 natural situations, there may be difficulty in keeping
 more than  one individual in each cage.  Their social
 intolerance is well documented  (453, 492).    Various
 species of Eutamias have been housed in groups with no
 fighting;  however, most chipmunks and squirrels are non-
 social and territorial in nature and would probably be
 difficult  to house in numbers.

 Longevity  -

 Chipmunks  have been known to live up to eight years in
 captivity.  Because they adapt well to conditions of
 captivity, their mortality is minimal in  laboratory
 situations (453) .

 Squirrels  will live from 10 to  15 years in captivity  (&17.)

 Toxicity Testing -

 Other than for simple residue analysis, squirrels and
 chipmunks  have not been used in toxicological  testing.
                             160

-------
General Suitability -

Chipmunks and squirrels are difficult to. breed and
maintain in a laboratory.  Suggested species from this
group are the eastern chipmunk  (T. striatus) because of
its abundance in the eastern United States and its size,
and the least chipmunk  (E. minimus)  for similar reasons,
though its range is northern and western.  These species,
and Glaucomys   are available from some dealers.

Ecological Alternatives -

Mice, ground squirrels.
                             161

-------
Rodentia; Cricetidae - Voles and Allies

Introduction -  '

The microtines  include the  lemmings  (Dicrostonyx,  Lemmus)
the red-backed voles  (Clethrionomys) and other basic grass-
land dwellers  (Phenacomys, Microtus).

This group includes both woodland, grassland and tundra
species.  All occupy similar niches  in these habitats, being
consumers of green vegetation with dentition specifically
adapted for crushing grasses, sedges, seeds, bark, etc.
They are mouse-like in form and size.

Because species of Microtus for example, M. pennsylvanicus,
M. ochrogaster, are the most utilized in laboratory work,
and most of the available information refers to these
forms, the following comments are generally restricted to
them.

Caging/Lab Conditions -

Two basic sizes of enclosures have been used to house these
small rodents.  Smaller cages of various sizes and materials
have been used to house breeding pairs; 12 x 8 x 5 inch metal
cages with lift off lids,  (493  , 494) 12 x 11 x 6  inch
plastic cages with wire mesh tops 12 x 18 x 11 inch
stainless steel, 18 x 7 x 4 inch fiberglass  (496); 29 x
19 x 13 inch polypropylene cages  (496).  A 36 x 30 cm
cage for mother and young has been used  (496).  Substrates
of peat moss  (493, 494) , and sand  (497) have been  used.
It has been reported that wire mesh  flooring is unsatis-
factory (495) .

Large enclosures for colonies have been used by some labs.
A 6 x 25 x 2 foot galvanized metal cage with 48, 2x3x6
inch nest boxes, has been used for studies on adrenocortical
activity in confined populations  (498).

Feeders have been used of 6 x 2-1/4  x 9/16 inch dimensions
with a 2 x 2-1/4 x 1 inch catch basket for overspill  (398).

Bedding materials are necessary, and some that have been
used include cotton, corn husks (499), dried grass, hay and
wood shavings  (496).
                            162

-------
Nutrition -

Corn, hay, wheat, oats, mixed vitamized olive oil and
excess hay (493,500) are some foods administered to
Microtus in the lab.  Others include Rockland mouse diet
supplemented with fresh greens (lettuce and cabbage)  (498)
though one report states green vegetable material is not
necessary and when given causes diarrhea and undue mess
(495).  One lab, whose feed is given in Table 14, reports
that M. ochrogaster is quite sensitive to deficiencies cf
any sort  (495).  Other feeds can be found in references
499, 501 and 496.  All sources state that water should
be available ad libitum.

Breeding/Rearing -

Microtus breeds well under laboratory conditions.  The
gestation period is 21 days  (453, 493, 502)and M.
agrestis averages 3.7 pups per litter.  M. oregoni averages
four or five litters each year under natural conditions.
Gestation is about  25 days in this species (503) .  M.
ochrogaster pups are weaned at .21 days, females reach
maturity at 35 to 40 days and males at 42 to 45 days  (495) .
Grasshopper mice, Onychomys, are seasonally polyestrous
in the wild with single females producing three to six
litters each year for two or three years  (497).

Female pine voles,  M. pinetorum, usually have two to  four
litters each year,  but could produce eight  (504).

The effect of ambient temperature and light conditions
on the reproductive ability of M. ochrogaster is shown in
Tables  15 and  16.

Special Needs -

Overcrowding Microtus impairs their reproductive potential
and sociability(498).  Acceptable population optimum
densities are not known.  Small cages are sufficient  for
one breeding pair and a single litter  (495).

Grasshopper mice  (Ocychomys; should be supplied  with  a
substrate suitable  for dust  baths  (497).

Pine voles  (M. pinetorum) are inhabitants of the cooler
woodland  floor and  are sensitive to high  temperature  (504).
                             163

-------
 Q
 W >:
 W tf
 D O


 Ql
 W Cf
 W C
O K
EH SC
O 2
fp H
    W
    &\
 Q  C3
 2  Q
 W
 a

 *Ł

 Ł8
    u
 cn H
 EH S
 2
 W CJ3
 2 2
 O H
§!
O  <
U  EH
    2
  •  H
 CU  &
rH  C
XI  &-
 (d
EH
              CT
Xll


•rl|
 0)
 C
 Q)
•H
t3
 0)
 n
 cr
 c
H
 04
 id
 M
 o
 CO

-P
 id


^•ro^rromoininm
rH rH rH rH rH










^-^
c
•H
0)
-P
0
>H
•p a
cn
id «*> cn
cu r- rH -P
A; >i rH «J J rH O Id O -rl
o C cn xi id H g
g id <4-i !S UH TJ
1-H-HMHrH MrH Q)
•HOV)SHrHO)OO.G
t,CQQQ«<>
a)
0)
u

c:
o
-P
4J
O
O

in
O

C
S-l
0
u












CN in
m on
0 rH rH O 0











,_^
1
\
D
U
H

O
rH 0
n3 o
ni *
H g in
•H rH
O (U *-'
^ c:
gQ o o
M XJ Q rH
 <












id
S-l
Q)
c
CU
cn
cu
EH
*
cn •
cu x:
•H cn
•a id
gdP
CTi
m »
4J
x: ia
Cnt-i
r*4
P
0 c»P
M oo
x:
•p -
c
rrt -- '
rQ '»H
0) 0)
JJ -p
o o
,_ 1 t.
r~l W
rH (X
CU
ftdP
rH
C 04
CU
X! -P
-P 3
O
T3 id
(U
X -P
•H id
g
'O
>1 0
rH C
XI-H
cn id
3 -P
0 C
M -H
O id
x; g
-p
c
0) O
rl 0)
CU XI
s
cn
cn id
•PX;
c
cu cn
•r| -H
»a tn
O >i
MrH
Cn (d
G C
M nj
*















r-
U3
1
Q)
CO
A:
o
o
u

1
IS

M
Q)
•rl
O
^-x


in
c^
TT

••
Q)
U
M
0
0
C/5

-------
             TABLE 15. REPRODUCTION OF U. Of.HROGASTER IN THE LABORATORY
                                AT DIFFERENT TEMPERATURES
  Temperature*
  Night   Day
   25
   20
   10
    5
    0
30
24
15
 9
 4
Number of
Days Pairs
160
120
102
60
48
16
15
12
16
20
Reproductive
Period
38
34
31
24
27.5
No.
Born
3.6
3.7
4.0
4.6
4.4
Young
Weaned
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.5
3.0
Percent
Survival
91
92
88
82
67
  •There was no consistent shift from one temperature to another,  with some animals spending
   several months at the same temperature.  Light was maintained above 20 foot candles for
   14 hours.
                   TABLE 1G.  REPRODUCTION OF ft. OCHROGASTER IN THE LABORATORY
                                      ON DIFFERENT LIGHT SCHEDULES
Hours*
Light
14
12
10
11
12
13
Number of
Days Pairs
60
35
32
37
38
32
16
25
26
28
30
31
                             Average re-
                             productive Period
                                   24
                                   36
                                   48
                                   59
                                   28
                                   23.5
% Bred 3 Days
Postpartum
86
43
39
40
83
88
Average
No . Young
4.57
(..2
3.7
3.7
4.55
4.6
Repr oduc tive
Efficiency
93
73
46
38
84
94
*The colony was stabilized at 14 hours light, 10 hours dark, then shifted down to 10 hours
 light by the steps and periods listed below, with approximately 50 cycles accumulated in
 each stage.  Temperature was maintained at 9 C day and 5 C night, on 12-12 hour changes.
Source:
          495
                                               165

-------
Behavioral  Restrictions  -

Fighting  is frequently reported  among  the  microtine
rodents  (412)  and  aggressiveness,  litter mortality and
infectious  disease have  been  shown -to  increase  as  the
density increases  (498).

Ecological  Role  -

The  small herbivorous rodents are  important components  of
nearly all  natural terrestrial communities.   They  are a
primary food source of smaller predacious  reptiles,  birds,
and  mammals.

Longevity -

Members of  this  group have  a  life-time of  about one  year
(503).

Problems  with  Mass Culture  -

Parasites can  be a problem  (497, 504).

Toxicity  Testing -

The  use of  Microtus in behavioral  studies  of overcrowding
is well documented (498, 505)  and  their reactions  to
certain pesticides (e.g., endrin,  dieldrin)  have also been
studied.  The  substances were administered orally  in a  corn
mixture and the  subjects individually  caged (6) .   The effect
of endrin on an  enclosed outdoor population was studied
by periodic trapping following administration of the
chemical  by spraying.  The  result  was  an immediate decline
in numbers  and no  recovery  in numbers  for  years after
(506).  Similar  studies with  endrin administered
orally to pine voles were conducted (507).   Rodenticide
studies have also  utilized  voles (508,  509).

General Suitability -

They are  small animals, easily and inexpensively kept.  M.
pennsylvanicus,  for example,  is plentiful,  has  a large
range, and  is  easily bred in  captivity.  These  are very
suitable  animals,  in general.

Ecological  Alternatives -

Other voles  (412),  Onychomys  (grasshopper mice), Clethriono'
(red-backed voles).
                             166

-------
Rodentia:  Cricetidae - Wild Mice

Introduction -

The mice of the genus Peromyscus and allies, Onychomys,
Reithrodontomys, Zapus, are by far the most abundant and
widespread native mammal group in North America.  The
white-footed mice are medium-sized mice with grey to brown
backs and sides and a very light underbody.  There are
about 16 species in the United States and representatives
of the genus can be found in all types of habitat.  The
most widespread species, P. maniculatus, ranges through
North America with the exception of the southeastern U.S. ,
the tundra of northern Canada, and the hot deserts of
Mexico.

All members of the genus are nocturnal; they are generally
ground dwellers, though some species nest in trees.  In
nature, they rely heavily on seeds for their food, but
eat invertebrates readily.  Spedies that have been used
for laboratory research include the white-footed mouse
(P. leucopus) , the deer mouse   (P_. maniculatus) , the golden
mouse  (Peromyscus = Ochrotomys nuttali), and "the cotton
mouse  (P_. gossypinusTT

Caging/Lab Conditions -

Lab enclosures that have proved satisfactory for housing
wild mice include a 15.5 x  14.2 x 12 inch cage  of 1-1/4
inch wire mesh with baking  pans for the tops and bottoms,
quart  fruit  jars with cotton for nesting and a  sawdust
floor  (510); a 9 x 7 x  5 inch wire mesh cage with re-
movable wood top and a  metal pan for the floor  and cotton
for nesting  (511); large aquariums or wire  cages with
solid bottoms covered with  a layer of sand  or wood chips
and nest material in small  nest boxes  (512).  For numbering
systems and data card see reference 494.

Nutrition -

Successful diets include frisky dog crackers and lettuce
(510); rolled oats, dry meat scraps, dry skim milk, whole
wheat, wheat germ, cod  liver oil, sunflower seeds, hemp
seeds, canary seeds, millet, iodine salt and lettuce
(494, 513); and commercial mouse chow supplemented with
rolled oats, whole corn, sunflower seeds, nuts, greens,
and fruits  (512).  Food and water are always supplied
ad libitum.
                             167

-------
 Breeding/Rearing  -

 The members  of  this  group  that have been used in labs,  for
 the most  part,  breed year  round and have three to six young
 per litter.   Gestation last from 23 to 30 days,  the young
 are weaned at about  25 days and achieve sexual maturity at
 about  55  days (510,  511, 514).   P.  maniculatus females
 mature faster than males  (514).

 P^ gossypinus is  known to  hybridize with P._ leucopus in
 captivity and produce fertile  offspring.   Cotton mice
 (P_. gossypinus)  ,  are  somewhat colonial  in  captivity and  a; -
 parently  reach  sexual maturity  later than some other wild
 mice  (approximately  70 days)  (510).   This species usually
 nests  off the ground in nature  (511).

 Golden mice  (O. nuttali) share  communal nest boxes in the
 lab.   In  nature,  they do not breed  from November to
 February.

 Special Needs -

 Nest boxes are better for  litter rearing than open cage
 floors.

 Ecological Role -

 Mice are  small omnivores that  are an important food source
 for small carnivorous reptiles,  birds,  and mammals.  They
 are found in  almost  all habitats throughout the  world and a
 very plentiful in many areas.   In some  cases  they are sig-
 nificant dispersers of seeds.

 Longevity -

 It is very unlikely  that the average life  span of wild  mice
 in nature exceeds two years, but in  captivity, a life span
of five to eight  years is not unusual  (412) .

Problems with Mass Culture  -

There are many known  parasites of mice,  e.g.,  nematodes
 (510,  515), fur mites,  and  fleas  (516),  lice  (494), and
these should be controlled.  Otherwise, wild  mice
 (Peromyscus)  seem quite suitable  for mass  culture.
                            168

-------
Toxicity Testing -

Wild mice, (Peromyscus maniculatus, 1?. leucopus) , have been
used in studies of the effects of DDT (167) and Endrin
(348, 506, 517) both in the lab and under natural condi-
tions.  Mouse populations declined after the ground appli-
cation of endrin by spraying  (eight ounces per acre) and
when fed endrin with their food in the laboratory, showed
adverse effects (348).

Experiments on the effects of sodium flouracetate - the
rodenticide was fed with bait in a natural environment -
have also been performed (518).

General Suitability -

This group in general is very easily bred and maintained
in the lab.  P^ maniculatus is the most abundant and wide-
spread species, but others are just as suitable for re-
search.

Ecological Alternatives -

Other mice (412).
                             169

-------
Rorientia:  Muridas - Lab Rats and Mice


Introduction -

The choice of research animals in the past has been based
on availability and ease of maintenance.  No group of
animals was more available than the old world rats   (Rattus
norvegicus) and mice  (Mus musculus) which have adapted so
well to living with man.  The white lab rats and mice of
today are albino strains of these species that have beer.
selectively bred for research purposes.

Caging/Lab Conditions -

There are numerous suitable cages available commercially
for housing laboratory animals, largely designed for lab
mice and rats.  Unique apparatuses for restraining, anesi':
tizing, bleeding, and feeding them are available, and are
specially designed for these gentle, docile, easily mani-
pulated species.

Lab rats and mice can be housed in nearly any enclosure
including fruit jars  (519), screened cages  (520), metal or
plastic cages  (521, 522).  Overcrowding should be avoided.
Typical mice cages are 18 x 12 x 6 inches and typical rat
cages are 24 x 20 x 10 inches  (289).

The type of bedding seems to be more important than the
cage.  Pregnant mice produced larger litters, and a
greater percentage of their progeny was successfully
weaned on sawdust than on a commercial deoderized cellu-
lose (523).  Mice housed on sawdust bedding also out-
produced those on corn cob bedding (524).  Other bedding
suggestions can be found in references 525, 526 and 527.
Other environmental factors found to affect the performance
of lab mice are ambient light conditions  (528, 529), noise
(530) , feeding schedules  (531) , isolation and stress  (532),
NH3, dust, and relative humidity (521). A thorough mainten-
ance procedure for mice is presented in reference 533.

Sawdust bedding for rats is considered inadequate due to
the intestinal obstruction it causes.  When it is screened
of small particles it provides a better substrate  (534).
Ventilation of the lab facilities is a proven necessity
(535).
                            170

-------
Nutrition -

Commercially prepared lab diets are used exclusively by
many institutions and together with water and a few minor
additions in specific cases, is supplied ad libitum  (519,
522, 536, 537, 538, 539, 540, 541).  There are food tube
dispensers available for accurate dispensing of certain
diets.  Feeding frequencies have been shown to affect growth
in young rats  (543).  There are controls for diarrheal
disease available  (544).

The suggested ration for adult mice is four to five gins per
day and for adult rats, 12 to 15 gms per day (289).

Breeding/Rearing -

The breeding of lab rats and mice is very easily accom-
plished if they are allowed space enough.  The mouse
gestation period lasts an average of 19 days; the litter
size averages 10 to 12 young and they are weaned at 16 to
21 days of age.  They are sexually mature at 60 days.
Females can produce up to ten litters in a lifetime and the
male breeding life lasts about 18 months.  One male to
three females is a suggested ratio for colonies  (289).

Albino rats are sexually active for about one year.  Females
gestate for 20 to 22 days and eight to 12 young per litter
can be expected.  They are weaned at about 21 days and
sexually mature at 100 days  (289) .

Behavioral Restrictions -

Overcrowding should be avoided.

Ecological Role -

Lab rats and mice are bred for man's uses only and have no
ecological role in the wild.

Toxicity Testing -

Albino rats and mice have been the most used subjects to
date in toxicity testing.  LDso's for large numbers of
compounds are available (545). (Testing methodologies, it
should be noted, vary greatly).  Behavioral tests have
also been developed.  Reviews of these methods and their
validity may be found in references 546 and 547.
                             171

-------
General Suitability -

Laboratory bred rats and mice are readily available and
easily maintained.  However, because they have been selec-
tively bred for laboratory work and long removed from the
genetic influences of wild-types, their relationship to
natural fauna is indefinable, and the results of studies
using them may not be extrapolable to populations in the
wild.

Ecological Alternatives -

Wild strains of rats and mice.
                             172

-------
Rodentia:  Castoridae, Cricetidae, Erethizontidae, Sciuridae,
Capromyidae - Large Herbivores

Introduction -

The beaver  (family Castoridae), the muskrat (family
Cricetidae), the porcupine (family Erethizontidae), the
yellow-bellied marmot, the woodchuck (family Sciuridae), and
the nutria  (family Capromyidae) are large herbivores not
often used  in laboratories,  In nature the beaver (Castor
canadensis) is distributed locally throughout North America,
utilizing streams and ponds with nearby cottonwoods, alders,
aspens, and so on  (412).  Both the muskrat (Ondatra
zibethica)  and the nutria (Myocastor coypus)are inhab-
itants of marshes, swamps, and bayous.  The muskrat ranges
throughout  most of North America.  The nutria occurs only
in the southern U.S. and Mexico, having been originally
a South American form.  The porcupine (Erethizon dorsatuir.)
is a heavy  bodied inhabitant of forested areas of the
western mountains and Canada.  The woodchuck  (Marmota monax)
occurs throughout the boreal Canadian forests and down into
the eastern U.S.  It prefers open woods, and brushy ,
rocky ravines (412).  The yellow-bellied marmot,  (Marmota
flaviventris) is an inhabitant of talus slopes, valleys,
and foothills throughout the Rocky Mountains  (412).

These large herbivores measure from 20 inches in total
length  (muskrat) to 45 inches  (beaver).  They feed on all
types of vegetation - leaves, bark, twigs, and roots.

Caging/Lab  Conditions -

Woodchucks  were caged outdoors in 5 x 20 x 5  feet cages
made of wire mesh which was extended into the ground to
prevent escape by burrowing  (548).  Porcupines  (2-3)
have been housed in 3 x 6 x 6 foot wire mesh  (549), and  a
pair of nutria in  3 x 2 x 1 foot metal cages with sawdust
bedding  (550).

Nutrition -

Captive woodchucks were fed on ear corn and smoked herring
 (548), porcupines on  lawn grass, hay, fruits, oats, and
lab chow  (549), and nutria on sugar beets and grasses  (550).
                             173

-------
 Breeding/Rearing  -

 Woodchucks  breed  in  February and March and average 3.5
 young per litter  (551,552).   Marmots breed about the same
 time  as  woodchucks and produce from three to six young per
 litter.  The  young emerge  from the burrow after about 30
 days.

 The colonial  beaver  has one  litter each year which averages
 three young.   They are born  between April and July.   Female
 beavers  do  not breed until they are 2 1/2 years old (412).

 The gestation period for porcupines is seven months and
 usually  there is  one young each time.  Breeding takes  place
 in the fall and birth in spring.   There has been some  suc-
 cess  breeding porcupines in  captivity (549).

 Nutria gestate for 120 to  139 days (the average is 128 days
 and average five  young per litter.  There is post-partem
 estrous  and two litters a  year seems to be the norm.  In
 captivity the sexual life  of nutria lasts to five years.
 Large cages are needed for breeding (550).

 Special  Needs -

 Fresh food  for the beaver, if needed, would probably be
 difficult to  provide,  and  its enclosure would have to  have
 a large  water supply,  a necessity for the grooming and
 cleaning of their oily fur.

 Fresh food  for the woodchuck and  marmot,  which should  in-
 clude  fresh greens,  might  also prove difficult and expen-
 sive  to  gather.

 Outdoor  cages might  be required for some species in this
 groups.

 Behavioral  Restrictions -

Woodchucks  and marmots are solitary,  territorial creatures
which do not  readily accept  other individuals of their
 species  in  their  cages (548).   They also hibernate for
months during the  winter.

None of  these species  can be maintained in wooded enclosure'
for all of  them would  find no difficulty in gnawing their
way out.
                             174

-------
Ecological Role -

The beaver is a furbearer; its dams create lakes and ponds.
Like the marmot and woodchuck, it is a primary consuir.er.
Nutria and muskrats are also classified as furbearers.
The porcupine feeds on bark and twigs in forested regions
of western U.S. and Canada.  All provide food resources
for the large carnivores.

Longevity -

Beaver have been known to life up to 11 years in the wild
and to 19 years in captivity.  The woodchuck's life span is
four to five years (412).  The life span of marmots is
unknown, but is probably very similar to that of the wood-
chuck.  Nutria will live 12 years in captivity (412) .

Problems with Mass Culture -

Space will be a limiting factor for these large rodents
(551).  The Sciurid forms will not readily accept confine-
ment in colonies.  The large rodents are hosts of the
usual external parasites including ticks, fleas, etc.(551).

Porcupines are covered with quills and may prove to be
difficult to handle.

Toxicity Testing -

Though no references were located dealing with the use of
the beaver, marmot, or woodchuck in toxicity testing, mar-
mots and woodchucks have been used frequently for physio-
logical studies of hibernation.

General Suitability -

These rodents are probably too large to handle easily.  In
addition, they require rather large enclosures.  Nutria
are used by some researchers who consider them quite suit-
able subjects  (550).

Ecological Alternatives -

Rice rat, voles.
                            175

-------
Carnivora:  Canidae - Large Species

Introduction -

Large carnivores have been decreasing  in number  as  their
habitats have decreased in size.  Wolves  (Canis  lupus, ar.d
C. niger) have lost large amounts of habitable area in the
U.S. and are practically extirpated from this country ex-
cept from Alaska  (Canada still has many wolf packs).

The common fox species are the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and
the gray fox  (Urocyon cinereoargenteus).  Both species are
locally common throughout North America, the red fox oc-
curring in open woodlands north of Mexico and the gray
fox in woodlands south of Canada  (412).

The coyote.(Canis  latrans)  is  an  inhabitant of  open brush-
land prairies and deserts throughout central and southern
North America.

The wolf and coyote are dog sized and  the foxes  generally
smaller (412) .

Large cats are too rare to consider for mass culture and
no lab work on bears  (ursidae) is known.

Caging/Lab Conditions -

Most cages for large carnivores are outdoors and large.

Nutrition -

Foxes have been maintained on fish and cooked cereals  (553)
In the wild the large carnivores are predators and  eat
most animal matter, as well as some berries and  grasses.

Breeding/Rearing -

Wolves are generally social creatures  and live in closely
knit packs.  Their breeding is tied to their social struc-
ture; they probably produce only the number of offspring
needed to keep their pack viable.  Gestation is  nine weeks
long (554).

Foxes breed from February to May, depending on latitude and
local conditions, and produce from one to seven  young per
litter (555,556,557).  Their gestation period is 52 days
and the young breed at one year (558,559).
                            176

-------
Coyotes have a gestation period of 64 days (554).   Five to
ten young are born in April or May and mature in one year.

Data on the breeding of large carnivores in captivity is
negligible, but in large enough enclosures there should be
no problem.

Special Needs -

Large carnivores prefer a den to sleep (556) .  They prob-
ably need large areas for exercise and high protein diets.

Ecological Role -

The smaller forms are predators on rabbits and rodents.
The wolves generally prey on larger animals.   Infrequently,
livestock is taken by all of these species.  Of economic
importance to man is the fur of these species (412,443).

Longevity -

Fox have a ten to fifteen year life span in captivity (555).

Problems with Mass Culture -

Canids are very susceptible to external parasites such as
ticks, lice, etc., as well as tapeworms and roundworms  (443)

Toxicity Testing -

In general, there is very little data concerning wild
Candis and toxicity testing.  The effect of diethylstil-
bestrol, a synthetic estrogen, on red foxes has been
studied with good success.  The foxes were force-fed the
substance  (560).

Coyotes have been subjected to the management of their
numbers by the administration of diethylstibestrol in
bait  (561).

General Suitability -

Due to their size, the large carnivores are probably less
suitable than smaller ones for laboratory research.  How-
ever, fox have been commercially reared by the  fur indus-
try and are breedable in captivity.
                            177

-------
Due to their dwindling population and large size, wolves
are considered very unsuitable for lab testing.

Coyotes are more plentiful than wolves and probably more
available to researchers.

Ecological  Alternatives  -

Domestic dog.
                            178

-------
Carnivora;  Procyonidae, Mustelidae

Introduction -

The small carnivores include the family Procyonidae which
has one representative in North America, the raccoon
(Procyon lotor) which occurs throughout the U.S. with the
exception of the high Rockies.  The species of Mustelidae
are numerous:  the marten (Martes americanaV the long-
tailed weasel  (Mustela frenataV the mink (Mustela vison),
the badger  (Taxidea taxus),the striped skunk(Mephitis
mephitis), and the European ferret (Mustela putorius).
The ring-tail  (Bassariscus astutus), the only North Amer-
ican member of the Bassariscidae, has not been extensively
used in lab work, but could prove very suitable.  The
following information refers to those species of small
carnivores which have been selected because of previous
laboratory use.

Caging/Lab Conditions -

Mink, weasels, and ferrets have been maintained under lab
conditions.  A good enclosure  for weasels is an 11 x 9 x
8  inch wooden  nest box  connected by a doorway at one end of
the box with a runway of  1/2  inch galvanized wire mesh
 (18 x 9 x 8 inches) where feeding and watering take place.
The nest  box is provided  with  a removable plywood lid held
in place  by a  fastening device.  The lid must be water
right if  the box is used  outdoors.  A false top is placed
underneath  the lid, consisting of  a frame filled with 1/2 inch
galvanized  soldered wire, resting  on two cleats and
held in position by two wire  finishing  nails pushed  through
holes in  the sides of the box. Shavings and excelsior  are
adequate  nesting materials.   Great  care must be taken to
secure all  edges and  joints because weasels are superb
escape artists (562).

The proper  housing of mink  can be  readily  learned  from
mink ranches.  European ferrets have been  successfully
housed in rabbit cages  with a 12 x 6 x  6 inch  nest box  (563)
and in double  compartment cages  similar to  those
described for  weasels (564).   They have been domesticated
for at least  2,000 years  and  their exact genetic  ancestry
is quite nebulous.  A natural photoperiod is nscessary  to
effect breeding  in  this species  (565).
                             179

-------
 Nutrition -

 In the wild,  the small carnivores feed on crayfish,  small
 birds, insects,  chipmunks,  rabbits,  mice, and shrews (566).
 Diets for weasels in captivity include hamburger,  mice,
 fish, bread,  milk,  and ground liver  (567) .   Ferrets  eat
 similar foods as well as dry dog food  and Gerber's Meat
 Base  for Babies  (563,564).   Bottles  containing milk  may
 be placed in  the cage to facilitate  serving that item (562;

 Mink  are fed  cotton rats,  raw meat (568), mice, fish, musp-
 rats , and frogs  (569).   For the fur  trade,  a special mink
 food  is prepared and sold commercially.

 Breeding/Rearing -

 The breeding  and rearing characteristics  of the Mustelidae
 are summarized in Table 17.

 Raccoons produce one litter each year  of  two to seven young
 which are born in April or May about 65 days after concep-
 tion.   They are  weaned  at about two  months  (412, 554).

 The ringtail  also produces  one litter  each  year of three to
 four  young that  are born in May or June and develop  at a
 rate  comparable  to  that of  the raccoon (412).

 Captive weasels  breed readily but about 58  percent of
 females bred  in  captivity fail to produce young and  the
 number whelped in captivity is often less than the four to
 nine  average  whelped in the wild (560) .   The family  Musteii-
 dae has delayed  implantation which makes  gestation times
 difficult to  determine  (570).

 Special Needs -

 Weasels need  dark sleeping  chambers  (562,564)  and  escape-
 proof  cages (562).   A natural photoperiod is essential for
 successful ferret breeding  (565).  The diets of the  small
 carnivores should include a substantial proportion of meat
 (563).

 Behavioral Restrictions -

 All mustelids  have  musk glands which are  responsible for
 their peculiar odors.   The  best known  example is the skunk
 (571,  572).   These  glands can be removed.   The weasels,
 ferrets,  and mink are nervous  and  frequently vicious ani-
mals  (443, 474,  563).   Skunk nest  boxes should be  left
 undisturbed while young are  present  (573).
                             180

-------









2
O
H
H
Q
O
O
A
D
5<<
2
Qi
W
Q
Ł2
^

Ł3
Q
H
ŁH
w
en
s

»3
H
jg
O
H
Q
0
&
cu
r_i
(0
.c
-P 1 CO
^
-P -P
*0 -r-l
M
0) 3
0^ -P
|CjJ (tf
s
G Ł
O M -P 1 ^
S cu c m
rH O W Q)
t
i — 1 ^ rH
1 (1) fl (tJ rH
-* fa S

\ t.
tn Q)
C -P
3 -P
O-rl
>l 1-5


oo
O* 1



CQ
O
J^l
-p
CO
W
O

a)
e
-H
^
^
(Q
tn H
3 3
1 I

>i G)
rH C
3 3


« CQ CQ
C
O
-ri
4J
nl
4J
CQ

0
r; r;
C C



-P CD
i i S^

rH rH



}_l
fd
Q)
^i

rH


O
1



rH
•H

1

rH



r-
I
rH


^
(1)
O
-p
Q)
cn
i
-P
CQ
3

3


en
r;
•g
O
g

O%
i
VO



rH
                                                                                 O
                                                                                •H
                                                                                -P
                                                                                 (0
                                                                                -P
                                                                                 c
                                                                                 (0
                                                                                rH
0)
 CQ
 (D
•rl
 O
 cu
 ^
w
            m

       o7   CN
 C
•H

 M
 H

a)
                                                        ro
                                        in

                                     04  -
                                     rH rH
3m

cn
                                                                 CO
                                                                 01
o
tn

id
CQ
                                                                                •s
                                                                                 o
                                                                                 0)
                                                                                4J
                                                                                 in
                                                                                 3
                                                                                S
                                                                                 c
                                                                                 (0
                                                                                 s
                                            181

-------
 Glass, wood,  or  any  other  material  that can be gnawed or
 broken may  be hazardous  (562).

 Ecological  Role  -

 The  small carnivores are predators  on many smaller  verte-
 brates and  invertebrates.   Many  also eat seeds,  fruits, an:
 certain herbaceous material.  Skunks and raccoons are often
 scavengers  and will  readily feed on carrion and human gar-
 bage.

 Longevity -

 Ferrets have  lived to nine years (563)  and the life spans
 of other mustelids are probably  comparable;  smaller forms
 will have shorter life spans.

 Problems with Mass Culture -

 Skunk parasites  are  numerous  and many of them are easily
 transmitted (515, 576, 577,  578).   Influenza,  canine
 distemper,  and tuberculosis are  a few diseases reported in
 captive ferrets  (563); however,  distemper can be treated.

 The small carnivores are usually solitary in nature and
 there are reports of individuals caged  together displaying
 great animosity  towards their cage  mates (574).

 All of these  species are nocturnal  by habit;  scheduling,
 and so on,  must  be made to fit their cycle (571,  572).

 Toxicity Testing -

 Mink, which are  farmed by  the pelt  industry and  readily
 available,  have  been used  in  testing of psychoactive com-
 pounds,  These were  administered orally to adult males in
 capsule form  by  means  of a hollow wooden rod.   Direct
 observations  of  the  males'  behavior followed.   Their innate
 aggressiveness made  them appropriate models  for  this work
 (579).  Wild  mink have been trapped, killed  and  tested for
 DDT residues  in  body tissues  (580)  and  used  in lab  feeding
 experiments with heavy metals, PCB's, etc.  (581,  582,  583).

Wild trapped  raccoons  were examined for incidence of DDT
 DDD, and dieldrin in a Missouri  study (584).
                             182

-------
In Great Britain a study was conducted of pesticide levels
in the European badger (Meles meles),  found dead along road-
ways from 1964 to 1968 (585).

General Suitability -

Small carnivores are relatively unavailable in large numbers
with the exception of mink that have been used in psycho-
logical behavior testing and judged quite suitable for such
research (579).  Culls are available from some ranchers.
Raccoon and skunks are locally abundant, but large-scale
trapping could decimate populations.   European ferrets are
an exotic domestic species and their suitability in
toxicity testing of wild species is questionable.

Ecological Alternatives -

Domestic cats.
                            183

-------
Carnivora:   Canidae,  Felidae  -  Domestic  Species

Introduction -

This subgroup of  carnivores includes  the dog  (Canis
familiaris)  and the cat  (Felis  domestica),  both  familiar
animals in  the laboratory.  They are  adapted  to  living wit
man, being  handled, etc.,  and are very suitable  for  lab
work.

Caging/Lab  Conditions -

A  36 x 16 x 18 inch cage of any easily cleaned and struc-
turally sound material is adequate for the  housing of cats
Breeding cages are larger, 36 x 24 x  30  inches and both
require litter  (289).

Dogs have been housed in 4 x  4  foot pens v/ith water  and i'c
containers  and resting platforms.   These are  connected
to outside  running pens  ranging in length from 12 to 20 fr
Inside pens 6x8 feet wil] house five adults (289) .  Con-
crete floors in dog kennels provide easy cleaning (289).

Nutrition -

Commercially available diets  with cooked horsemeat or brot
and additional vitamins  are used for  dogs.   Cats are also
maintained  on commercial  foods.  Water should be provided
ad libitium for both  (586, 587).

Suggested dog rations are one-half ounce dry  dog chow per
one pound of body  weight.  Adult cats should  be  fed  four
percent of  their  body weight  each day.   Twice this ration
should be given to growing animals (289).

Breeding/Rearing  -

Dogs vary somewhat in their breeding  schedule,  so the
beagle is chosen  as the  pattern subject  because  of its
size,  availability, and  adaptability  to  lab conditions.
Beagle females undergo estrous  every  150 to 200  days and
apparently  can produce only one litter each year. Gesta-
tion lasts  63 days and four to  eight  young  are born  per
litter.   They are  weaned  in six to eight weeks and are
sexually mature in one year.  The breeding  life  of female
beagles  is  six to  ten years and that  of  males a  little
longer.   One male  can service about 60 females in a
breeding colony though hand-mating may be required•(289) •
                             184

-------
 Domestic cats  can breed  a number of times each year.  The
 estrous cycle  is  intermittent  and  irregular.  Gestation
 lasts an average  of 62 days  and litter  size  is from one  to
 six with an average of four.   Weaning takes  place  in  six to
 eight weeks and the young are  sexually  mature in six  months.
 The breeding life of females is four to five years and males
 generally can  breed a few years longer.  In  a breeding
 colony, one male  for six females is suggested (289).

'Special Needs  -

 Dogs require no special  bedding but a sleeping platform
 raised from the floor.   Cats should be  provided bedding  and
 litter of wood shavings, etc.

 Pregnant female dogs near term should be provided  with
 whelping boxes lined with shredded paper.  Pregnant female
 cats near term should be provided  with  nest  boxes.  They
 should always  be  separated from other animals (289).

 Behavioral Restrictions  -

 Both dogs and  cats are easily  handled and should present no
 behavioral problems in the lab.

 Ecological Role -

 The ecological role of carnivores  similar to the dog  and
 cat is discussed  in the  section on large carnivores.
Longevity  -

Domestic dogs are productive  for six to 14 years, cats  for
four to seven years (289) .

Problems with Mass  Culture -

There are no apparent problems  associated with mass  culture
of domestic  dogs and cats.

Toxicity Testing -

The use of domestic cats  and  dogs  in research is quite
extensive.  Tests and methods from many disciplines  includ-
ing physiological,  immunological,  biomedical, and toxico-
logical areas are available for both species.

-------
General Suitability -

This group is available in large numbers and adapted to
laboratory life.  The animals are handled with ease and
are..most suitable subjects for experimental work.  How suit
able they are for toxicity testing is difficult to say be-
cause their gene pools have been manipulated by man and,
in  some important ways, have been free for many years fred
natural selection pressures.

Ecological Alternatives -

Mink, European ferret.
                            186

-------
Ungulates:  Equidae, Bovidae


Introduction -

The domestic ungulates that have been used for scientific
testing other than the swine and allies are the donkey,
mule, horse, pony, and cattle.  They are all large herbi-
vores, eating a variety of plant foods.

Caging/Lab Conditions -

The enclosures to contain domesticated ungulates must be of
suitable dimensions to accommodate their large size.  Access
to an outdoor lot is desirable.  No better description of
suitable enclosures is available, probably because the
maintenance of these domestic animals is so routinely
accomplished.

Special Needs -

Salt licks are necessary for all these animals.

Behavioral Restrictions -

All these animals may be difficult to handle and control
because of their large size.  The biting and kicking of
donkeys and mules is well known.

Ecological Role -

The ungulates are grazing and browsing animals which rely
entirely on plant material for their food.

Problems with Mass Culture -

The space needed to house these animals is considerable.
Likewise, the food expense is much greater than for other
groups.

Toxicity Testing -

Because these animals are of economic importance, they have
been used quite extensively in many types of experimental
work, particularly in the study of the effects of pesti-
cides on their bodily functions.  Chemicals tested on
cattle include heptachlor  (588), DDT, BHC, lindane, methory-
chlor, chlordane, toxaphene, aldrin, dieldrin, endrin
(589, 590) and others  (591, 592).  These chemicals are
                             187

-------
administered in foods and through capsules.  The  testing
was conducted primarily to assay chemical  residues  in  animal
products consumed by man.  Substances  that have been studiec
for their effects on cattle are nicotinic  acid  (593),
dimethyformamide  (594) , arsenic, flourine, lead,  salt,
selenium (595), iodine  (596), and molybdenum  (597).

Calves have been used in studies of taste  reception; the
peripheral nerves were successfully exposed and impulses
monitored (598, 599).

Horses, donkeys, and mules have also been  subjects  in
studies of such pesticides as organophosphorous and carbo-
mate pesticides (591), DDT, toxaphene, and chlordane  (592).

General Suitability -

The large size and domestic status of  this group  reduces
its suitability for the laboratory.  Smaller ungulates
(sheep, miniature swine) may be better subjects.

Ecological Alternatives -

Deer, sheep.
                            188

-------
Ungulates:  Suidae, Tayassuidae


Introduction -

Because of their smaller size, the swine (Sus scrofa) and
javelina  (Tayassu tajacu) are used more in research than
other domestic ungulates (600).  The special breeding of
miniature swine in the last decade or so has been very ex-
tensive and their availability is increasing.  (For a re-
view of breeding stock and strains developed, see reference
 600).  While miniatures possess all the characteristics
of standard swine, they are far smaller and weigh from 70
to 90 kg, about as much as the average man.  Their size
and availability have led to their increasing use in bio-
medical research  (600).  The javelina, or collared peccary,
is a native North American animal found commonly in Texas,
New Mexico, Arizona, and Northern Mexico.  It belongs to
the family Tayassuidae.  Another closely related species,
the white-lipped peccary (T. Pecari), occurs from Central
America to Paraguay.  This swine-like animal weighs between
16 and 20 kg, and averages about 90 cm in length with a
shoulder height of approximately 54 cm.  The ears are
small and erect, and the hair is long, bristly and dark in
color (601).

The following discussion is restricted to the miniature
swine unless otherwise indicated.

Caging/Lab Conditions -

Housing for miniature swine is generally a large community
cage of pipe and fencing.  From one to ten pigs, depending
on age, are housed in 4 x 4 x 8 feet indoor cages with con-
crete floors and adequate ventilation.  Outdoor cages 8 x
16 feet with earthen floors and a shelter roof with sawdust
bedding at one end of the pen housed an unknown number of
animals  (602).  Old dog kennels are apparently quite suit-
able enclosures (603).  The transport apparatus, obser-
vation and holding pens used at the Sinclair Research Farm
are shown in Figures 15, 16, and 17 respectively.

Techniques for handling miniature swine for laboratory pro-
cedures are presented, with diagrams, in reference 604.

Pentobarbital sodium is a recommended anesthesia at  50 mg/4
kg body weight administered via the anterior vena cava.
Blood collecting has been accomplished from the same vessel
using 19 or 20 guage needles.  Tranimul  (600) and a  spinal
two percent procaine  (603) have proven acceptable tran-
quilizers.

                             189

-------
Figure 15.
Miniature swine transport apparatus,
Sinclair Comparative Research Farm,
University of Missouri, Columbia,
Mo.  65201
Figure 16.
Miniature swine observation enclo-
sures (20" x 30" floor area).
Sinclair Comparative Research Farm
                         190

-------
Figure 17.
Miniature swine in holding pen
(81 x 12' floor area).  Sinclair
Comparative Research Farms
                         191

-------
Nutrition -

Commercial pelleted hog feed given twice daily is a suitable
diet  (602).  Water should be supplied ad libitum.  A small
container for the water should be used to prevent the swine
from playing in it (600).  The Hormel Institute has utilized
four different pig diets:  pig starter, growth ration, ges-
tation rations, and maintenance ration, containing about
19, 15, 16, and 13 percent protein, respectively.  The
Institute has also developed an artificial diet for baby
pigs.  These four diets are given in Tables 18 through 21.

Breeding/Rearing -

With a regimen of full feeding, an average of 5.5 pigs per
litter are obtained by the Minnesota Hormel Institute.  A
piglet weighs 750 to 800 gms at birth, grows to 18 kg at
140 days, and is full grown and about 90 kg at one year
(600).  The Battelle Northwest Biology Laboratory uses
Pittman-Moore miniature swine, but limits the feeding
regimen of adult swine to 900 gms of feed per day.  Their
swine average six young per litter but do not reach adult
weight until they are two to three years old.  Gestation
ranges 112 to 115 days  (603) for the miniature swine.  For
the javelina which averages about three young per litter,
the period ranges from 142 to 148 days.  Some females
have two litters each year  (601).

The Oregon Dental School, Portland, has maintained Pittman-
Moore swine for some years, and reports that young were
weaned at 42 days and all members of the same age group
housed together for four months, segregated according to
sex; this communal housing effort tends to increase the
sociability of the swine (602).

Special Needs -                 ,   .    •

Pen-to-pen contact between individuals should be limited to
prevent transmission of disease (603).  New arrivals
should be temporarily quarantined; vaccinations for certain
diseases are available  (603).

Swine housed outdoors need protection from the weather and
should always be provided shelter from direct sunlight.
Concrete floors are recommended to control parasites  (603).
Exercise areas are needed if swine are housed indoors  (603).
                            192

-------
    a)
   MH
    O

    (0

O  flJ
H Q
    ^
EH  O
S -P
O
« vo
O in
    O
Ul
0 4J
M C
O 0)
A 0
m a)
°Ł
04
e c
3  >


O
cO
VH
O
rl
3
>s!
CTi
1
*
Q
H
CM
-P
u
d
Q)
>H
t)
0
-p
(0
•rl
T3
rl
rl
H
                                                                                         in
                                                                                         o
                                                                                         vo
                                                                                        W
                                                                                        O
                                                                                        to
                                        193

-------











^^
/1\
cu
c
Id
cu
2=
0)
M

^J "
H M
S 
S t!
21 J
0 ^
EjŁ
5 o
ft *"l
M 4J
p;
i-H
•rl
. -P
CO -^
3 -P
0 Ł
in cu
O 0
x: M
& a>
W/^
Ui
O'-'
x:
§4J
c
-H O
0 0
i • .
rH H
Id O
O CX
^^

^^.
C -P
•H C
CU H
0^

M»
c
V4
o
u

^
o
M
Cn

^
cn
-P
(d
O
Alfalfa Meal 17%
'u
cu
-P
fd
k

>i
r|
CU
Q
Alfalfa Meal 17%

t>
cu
^_i
p
o
i
c

to

p^
(d
V-4
CQ

1 i
ttJ
cu

Is
rH
cu
s
rH
•H
O

Ł
flj
CU
XI

0
cn
%
1 Dried Solubles
o cn
vo V-j
cu
0) rH
CJ* rH
rd -H
•^ ^
c cn
fO -H
M Q
Solubles
ri
CO
-r^
ft4

"O
CU
•H
}^
a

^1
cu

2

•a
Q)
•rl

Q
Phosphate

g
3
•rl
O
rH
(d
0
•H
Q







-P
H
td

Yeast
r^
o

m
•rl

(d
H

H




O
fd

O
^j
rj
l<
rH
•H
O
Q
+

ril

Ł
•rl
e
m
+J
•rl
>
                                194

-------
M
0 4J
SH C
O Q)
A 0
W Q)


CTi 00
m vo
rH O
o o


o
TJ«
o
o


in r-
m o
rH O
0 0


0
fO
o
0


0
CO
o
0
                                                                       VO
               A,
               3 c
               -H (1)
               o o

               (0 Q)
         n   in  o  in
         n   o  o  r-\
         O   O  ro  o
n  o   o
o  vo   ^
O  O   rH
                                                                       VO
                                                                       in
                                                                       m
                                              o  o
O Cn
H C
   0)
H
 C -P
•H  C
 O  Q)
                  a)
                                     vo
                                              O
                                              vo
                            
-------
          Table 21.   ARTIFICIAL DIETS FOR BABY PIGS








Per Quart Homogenized Cow's Milk



One Whole Egg Plus




     5 ml Salt Mixture Consisting of:



          49.80 g        FeSO.        7 H_0
                             *±           ^


           3.90 g        CuSO.        5 H_0



           3.60 g        MnCl2        4 HO




           0.26 g        KI




200 ppm Aureomycin on Solid Basis plus water to make one

liter solution.
SOURCE:   (605).
                            196

-------
Pregnant females should be separated from other swine on
the 109th day of gestation, washed and cleaned of parasites,
and housed in a disinfected cage with clean straw bedding
(see 603 for a plan for farrowing pens).

Behavioral Restrictions -

Sexes should be separated and sows with a new litter should
be handled with care because they can be quite dangerous
(603) .

Ecological Role -

In the wild, pigs are omnivorous, feeding on nuts, fruits,
leaves, cacti, grubs, etc. (412).  Javelina inhabit areas
of rather dense vegetation (chaparal, mesquite, brushlands)
and are usually localized around a waterhole (412).

Longevity -

Miniature swine are known to live for more than six years
(600).

Problems with Mass Culture -

Although miniature, these swine are still large as lab
animals  (600, 602).  Maintenance is expensive and the
food costs may be limiting (606).  Swine are subject to a
host of diseases, some of which are curable (603).

The javelina is rather new to the laboratory world and
little is known about its diseases and parasites  (601).

Toxicity Testing -

Miniature swine are used in biomedical research  (607, 608,
609, 610, 611, 612)and other fields as well.  The Sinclair
Farms, University of Missouri, uses them extensively as
test animals  (613).

Toxicity testing has been done for a variety of substances,
including manganese chloride (614) and selenium  (615).
Pesticide effects have been investigated by scores of work-
ers  (152, 590, 591, 592, 616, 617, 618, 619, 620, 621).

Javelinas have been used in cardiovascular research  (601).
                            197

-------
General Suitability -

Swine are domestic animals.  Their availability and the vast
amount of knowledge we possess about their breeding and
maintenance are their greatest advantages as lab animals.
As test animals they have been used successfully in re-
search in immunology, nutrition, dental, radiocardiology,
cardiovascular physiology, and pathology (600, 606, 622).
Their suitability as representatives of a complex, natural
ecosystem is unknown.  The javelina, however, is a wild
form and would be quite suitable for toxicity testing, if
available in the future in large numbers.

Ecological.Alternatives -

Sheep, cattle.
                            198

-------
Ungulates:  Bovidae

Introduction -

Sheep and goats are grazing and browsing herbivores.  There
are.both domestic and wild species but the native members
of this group - Dall's sheep (Ovis dalli) the bighorn
sheep (Ovis canadensis), the mountain goat (Qreamnos
americanus), the Bison (Bison bison) and the musk ox  (Ovibos
moschatus) are rare species and not suitable for use as
test animals.

Caging/Lab Conditions -

Cages should be dry and well ventilated and of sufficient
size tc allow free movement, with access to sizable runs.
Both sheep and goats can be communally housed, though the
uncastrated males should be limited in their access to
other animals during the rutting season, which occurs in
the fall, because they become aggressive and produce a
great odor (623).

The layout of an operating suite for sheep  (at the
Agricultural Research Council Institute of Animal
Physiology) is detailed in reference 624.

Nutrition -

Mature  goats do well on sun cured  15 percent protein alfalfa
pellets and block  salt with the addition of one pound of an
inexpensive roughage such as hay or straw.  Does used for
reproductive purposes should receive from one to 1.5 pounds
per day of a mixture of choice legume hay and 14 to  16 per-
cent quality grain.  Clean water should be available at all
times (623) ..

Breeding/Rearing -

Goats ordinarily breed in the fall of the year and give
birth from February to June.  The kids need milk for six
weeks and then should be weaned on a high protein dry food
diet.   They reach  maturity at three years and weigh  120 to
150 pounds as adults (623).

Ecological Role -
                                                      i
Goats and sheep are herbivores and feed on  a great variety
of  plant  materials.  The wild forms are high mountain
animals.
                            199

-------
Problems with Mass Culture -
                      t
The long generation  time  and  large  size  of  these  animals
makes mass culture expensive.

Toxicity Testing - "

Pesticide residues in free-roving mountain  goats  have been
determined   (625) by standard tissue  analysis.  Domestic
stock have been  utilized  for  many types  of  research includ-
ing toxicity studies of various  substances  (590,  592, 616,
517, 618, 619, 620,  626,  627).   Noteworthy is  the Veteri-
nary Diagnostic  Laboratory at the Iowa State University
which have been  working with  long-term effects  of pesticide-
on domestic  sheep (628, 629).

3eneral Suitability  -

The suitability  of all domestic  animals  as  subjects in
toxicity testing is  suspect because of their close associa-
tion with man's  world, and because  they  have been so long
removed from the selection pressures  of  their natural en-
vironment.   However, the  sheep is probably  more suitable  in
this respect than other domestic species (613,  630).


 Handling of these domestic creatures is not difficult.
 Their suitability for surgical methods, etc.,  is discussed
 at length by Fletcher, et al., 1964

 Ecological Alternatives  -

 Other ruminants,
                             200

-------
Ungulates:  Cervidae, Antilocapridae


Introduction -

The deer and allies are grazing and browsing animals from
two families.  The Cervidae are the deer-like ungulates:
elk, moose, mule deer, white-tailed deer.  The Antilocap-
ridae have a single representative in the U.S., the prong-
horn, which inhabits open prairies and sagebrush plains of
the west central U.S.  Unlike Cervids, in which only males
have deciduous antlers, both sexes of pronghorn possess
true horns that are never shed.

The weight of the adult male elk (Cervus canadensis) and
the moose•(Alces alcesj is from 800 to 900 pounds; female
weights are about 200 pounds less.  They stand five to six
feet high and the males of both, species have magnificent
racks.  The moose antlers are broadly palmate and elk, ant-
lers are morphologically similar to those of native deer,
but considerably larger.

The mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and the white-tailed
deer  (0. virginianus)are smaller than elk, standing be-
tween three and four feet high and weighing between 150 and
400 pounds.  The mule deer ranges throughout western North
America in many habitat types.  The white-tail is an
eastern species inhabiting all types of forest and brush-
land  (412) .

Pronghorn  (Antilocapra americana) stand about three feet
high and weigh between 75 and 130 pounds (412) .

Caging/Lab Comditions -

Any large outdoor enclosure of adequate areal extent and
height is suitable, but cover is essential both from the
sun and the cold in northern climates.  An outdoor holding
pen used at the Denver Wildlife Research Center is shown
in Figure 18.

In the wild, deer eat twigs, shrubs, acorns, grass farm
crops, and certain fungi  (412, 443).  Elk and pronghorn
have similar diets.  The moose inhabits swampy, marshy
areas and feeds particularly on aquatic vegetation, but
also on shrubs and saplings.  White-tailed deer were
maintained on Ralston Purina Dairy  chow for three years
during a pesticide study  (631).
                            201

-------
Figure 18.  Deer holding pen.  Denver Wild-
            life Research Center, Federal
            Center, Denver, Colorado
                         202

-------
Water in large quantities is essential to all of these
animals (412, 443, 631).

Breeding/Rearing -

White-tail deer have been bred and reared in captivity, pro-
ducing one or two fawns each year.  Females mature in their
second year  (631).  In nature, all the ungulates breed once
a year and produce one or two fawns (412).  Gestation for
the pronghorn, moose, and elk is about eight months and for
the deer species  from six to seven months (412).

Special Needs -

Moose prefer aquatic habitats for feeding and wading during
the summer months and may require water facilities for such
activity in captivity.  All ungulates require mineral (salt)
licks (443).

Behavioral Restrictions -

Many species have a migratory tendency and may become quite
restless at certain times during the year (412, 443).

Ecological Role -

The ungulates are rather strict herbivores and graze on
many plant foods  (412).  They are prey for large predators,
particularly wolves.  They also constitute the major big-
game animal group in North America.  In some agricultural
localities, they can be serious pests of crops  (412).

Longevity -

Elk have lived to 25 years in captivity.  In the wild their
life span is probably less.  Deer live to 16 years in the
wild, moose to 20 years, and pronghorn have been known to
reach 14 years (412).

Problems with Mass Culture -

The cost of maintaining a heard of large animals is high and
the reproductive rates are rather slow.  A deer, for
instance, gives birth to one or two fawns each year.

In enclosed situations, deer chew each others tails and
ears.  Mortality due to the "white muscle disease" can be
significant  (631).
                             203

-------
Toxicity Testing -

DDT residues have been assayed from samples of free-running
pronghorn, deer, elk, and moose  (625).  Radioiodine has
been sampled from thyroid tissues of free running deer and
in Colorado following underground explosions in Nevada (632),
Strontium-90 has been assayed from the mandibles of free
running mule deer (633) .

One study of the effects of dieldrin on reproduction, mor-
tality, etc., in white-tail deer in Missouri was conducted
under controlled conditions on captive subjects (631).

General Suitability -

Limited reproduction and large size problems probably ex-
clude the large ungulates from mass culture and extensive
use in toxicity testing.  The white-tail deer or mule deer
would be the most likely candidates from this group for
use in toxicity testing.

Ecological Alternatives -

Sheep.
                             204

-------
Primata


Introduction -

Because of their close relationship to man, non-human pri-
mates have been used in many fields of research.  Primates
are omnivorous animals that have acquired the use of their
hands and often their feet as effective grasping organs
through the development of opposable digits.  This makes
them particularly adapted for climbing, and most primate
species are arboreal.

They are found in the Old and New World tropical and sub-
tropical latitudes.  The species used in research in North
America come from South America, (Platyrrhines), Africa
(Papio, Cercopithecus, Erythrocebus, Theropithecus) and
AsiarMacaca),(634).  Recent restrictions on the capture
and shipment of primates may affect availability in the
future.

The most studied primate species other than man is the
Rhesus monkey  (Macaca mulatta).  Adults weigh 20 to 25
pounds and their life spans are much longer than those of
the other mammalian groups.  The comments below refer to
this species, but many are applicable to other species as
well (i.e., squirrel monkeys, Saimiri).

Caging/Lab Conditions -

Cages for adult Rhesus monkeys should be at least 24 x 24
x  28 inches and house no more than a pair while breeding
or a mother and her infant.  Smaller juveniles  can be kept
in 14 x 12 x 18 inch cages  (289).  Cages of various dimen-
sions can be used to house large numbers of primates.  They
are social animals and intra-specific contact is desirable.
Enclosures should be provided with suitable props for use
in climbing and exercise.  Cages used at Iowa State Univer-
sity are shown in Figures 19, 20 and 21.

Nutrition -

Primates cannot metabolize ascorbic acid, so a daily ration
must be provided.  After weaning, all ages of monkeys can
be sustained on commercially prepared monkey chow  (289).
In nature they are omnivorous, feeding primarily on fruits.
Supplements to the ration of chow can include all types of
fruit and vegetable foods.  Daily rations should be four
percent of body weight, and in communal cages a number of
                            205

-------
Figure 19.  Primate cages - squirrel monkeys
            metal - commercially available.
            Iowa State
Figure 20.
Plexiglas and metal - fabricated
at Iowa State.  (For dimensions
see Figure 21.)

             206

-------
Figure 21.  Plexiglas cage,  fabricated at Iowa State
            University.
                           207

-------
feeding areas should be established because dominant indi-
viduals will monopolize food sources.  Water should be sup-
plied ad libitum  (289).

Breeding/Rearing  -  ,

Gestation for Rhesus monkeys averages 165 days, and there
is usually only one young born at a time.  They are fre-
quently removed from the mother soon after birth and reared
in a separate nursery.  This procedure decreases infant mor-
tality.  After three to six months, the young will eat solid
foods.  Sexual maturity is achieved at five years for female;
and six years for males.  The breeding life of Rhesus mon-
keys is  12 to 15  years ^nd females are receptive periodically
throughout the year.  The breeding colony sex ratio can be
one male for up to ten females.

Special Needs -

Vitamin C is a diet requirement for primates  (289).

Behavioral Restrictions -

Monkeys are often difficult to handle and unpredictable.
Special training of prospective handlers should be con-
sidered for their safety   (289).  A review of physical and
chemical restraints is presented in reference535.

Ecological Role -

Non-human primates are omnivorous animals of tropical and
sub-tropical regions of the world.  Their staple foods are
fruits, leaves, roots, insects; they frequently consume
larger animals.  They are prey for large predators.

Longevity -

Life spans of 15-20 years are not uncommon for Rhesus mon-
keys (289).

Problems with Mass Culture -

The generation time for primates is probably too long to
allow extensive use of this order of mammals when large
numbers are required.

Toxicity Testing -

Because of the long life spans of primates, they are invalu-
able in long-term research.  The close relationship of
                             208

-------
monkeys to man is also an inducement to their use in research.
Experimental work in which primates have been subjects in-
clude pesticide toxicity work  (272, 620, 636, 637), inhala-
tion of various gases  (638). and other toxicity studies (104,
639, 640, 641).

General Suitability -

Non-human primates are desirable as experimental subjects be-
cause of their close relationship to man.  Their long life
spans and specialized behavior also make them very suitable
for certain types of studies  (630).   However, extensive use
of primates in research is impossible because of their slow
rate of reproduction.  Recent export restrictions may reduce
their availability in the future and increase cost.

Ecological Alternatives -

Fruit-eating bats, man.
                             209

-------
Marsupiala


Introduction  -

The only marsupial native  to North America  is  the opossum
(Didelphis marsupialis) which exists throughout North Amer-
ica except for the hzgher  Rockies and  the plains of  the
Dakotas.  It  is probably limited in the north  by the low
winter temperatures.

The opossum is an unspecialized mammal with a  prehensible
tail.  Its pelt is of poor quality.  It is  primarily noc-
turnal and omnivorous.  Farming areas  and disturbed  wood-
lands are preferred habitats  (412).

Adult opossums are about 18 inches in  length with a  tail of
equal length  and weigh between nine and 13  Ibs.  (412).
The pouchless opossum  (Marmosa mitis)  has only recently
been used in  the laboratory.

Caging/Lab Conditions -

Cages for breeding pairs are 20 x 22 x 15 inches of  gal-
vanized metal and 32 x 26  x 24 inches  of galvanized  metal
for individuals (642).

Large outdoor cages seem to better the reproductive  perfor-
mance in opossums.  Large  wooded areas (150 x  300 feet)
were closed off by chain 1 ink fence eight feet high  with an
eighteen inch wide metal strip around  the top.  Nest boxes
5x5x3 feet were provided  (642).  A 36 x 16 feet  en-
closure of poultry netting surmounded  by tin strips  with
walls extending two feet in the ground has been used  (643).
Breeding pens 20 x 40 feet are large enough to accommodate
ten adults (644).  Other suitable nest boxes include dog-
house type structures with removable roofs  (645) and
barrels with  straw bedding (644).

In one lab, relative humidity under 50 percent resulted in
swollen and cracked tails  (646) .

Marmosa have been kept in  8 x 8 x 11 inch cages with a
4  inch metal  can secured to a cage top for  a nest facility.
Colonial metal enclosures  of 2 x 2 x 3 feet have also
been used (647).
                             210

-------
Nutrition

Opossums do well on simple diets such as dog pellets sup-
plemented twice a week with canned dog food and some fresh
fruit or vegetables (645).
                    4
Other supplements include raw meat scraps, bone meal  (644)(
cat chow, and mealworms  (642).

Water is supplied ad libitum in most labs.

Breeding/Rearing -

Marsupial reproduction differs from that of other mammals
in one unique way:  the young are born after a very short
gestation period  (12-13 days for the opossum [643]) and
crawl to a pouch where further development takes place.
There are usually 13 teats in the mothers pouch.  This can
be a limiting factor in litter size.  The litter average
for 17 females in one colony was 6.7 (644).  There are
usually two litters each year (648).

Breeding in captivity is apparently best achieved in large
outdoor pens (642, 645).  In some cases, in smaller con-
fines the nest boxes were removed during the mating period.

One lab team removed the young from the mothers pouch and,
in one case, the female produced a second litter of 12
only 16 days later (644).

Special Needs -

Nest boxes are considered necessary (647) as is suitable
bedding changed weekly—straw, shredded paper  (642, 643,
644, 645, 649).   Litter pans should be changed daily  (642)

Behavioral Restrictions -

Some reports of pair incompatibility (647, 649) suggest
social problems in keeping opossums.

Another lab reported a very high mortality rate  (to 75
percent) in colonial housing, although a great decrease in
this rate was shown when individuals were caged separately
and sanitary practices strictly enforced.   (The high mor-
tality was due mainly to infectious diseases)  (642).  The
nocturnal habits of opossums may pose problems in their
handling and use.
                            211

-------
 Ecological Role

 The opossum will eat any food,  plant or animal.  Insects
 make up a large portion of their diet during certain seasons
 of the year.   Other food items  include bird eggs, birds,
 snails, earthworms and carrion  (413).   The opossum is a
 food source for large raptors and carnivorous mammals (412),

 Longevity -

 The opossum has been known to live up to four and one-half
 years in captivity (646) .   Mortality rates in captured in-
 dividuals are very high in some cases (642).

 Problems with Mass Culture -

 Parasites are probably the greatest deterrent to the main-
 tenance of large colonies  (647, 649, 650, 651, 652, 653,
 654).  The parasite load is very great in captive indivi-
 duals,  and the colony must be cleaned up every six months
 (645).

 There is evidence that litter size decreases in captivity
 and that breeding takes place more frequently  (644) .

 The opossum does best in outdoor enclosures because it need
 large spaces.   This kind of caging also eliminates the need
 to change litter pans daily (642, 643, 644, 655).

 Toxicity Testing -

 Though  little toxicological testing has been done with opos
 sums, the ready accessibility of relatively undeveloped
 young offers  a unique possibility for work with developing
 organisms.   (See reference 656  for a successful technique
 for the removal of "embryos" from the teat and subsequent
 handling procedures.)

General  Suitability -

 Because of the accessibility of its young and its ability
 to breed in captivity,  the opossum seems well suited for
 toxicological testing.

Ecological Alternatives  -

Other omnivores.
                            212

-------
Edentata
Introduction -

The armadillo is a member of a tropical family (Dasypodidae)
that have degenerate teeth and a horny protective body cov-
ering resembling a plated coat of armor.  One species
(Dasypus novemcinctus) has established itself in the central
southern U.S. and is commonly seen at night within its range.
Armadillos feed on the plant and animal material which they
unearth with their specially adapted, well-clawed forefeet.
The average adult is about 16-inches in length and has a
15-inch tail.  They weigh from eight to  17 pounds (432).


Caging/Lab Conditions -

A single L-shaped unite consisting of two pens separated by
a removable plywood divider placed diagonally through the
center of a wading pool is described as suitable for arma-
dillos.  The first pen in the L-shaped structure is 9 x 4
x 4 feet.  The second is 18 x 4 x 4 feet.  Fir boards
and plywood were used for the walls and floor and lined with
two or three layers of 44 inch wide fiberglass cloth and
treated with a resin compound and surface curing agent.
(Enclosures of metal or wood proved inadequate because of
injury to the animals or maintenance costs).  In the pool,
the bottom was covered with gravel.  Cedar shavings were
used as floor bedding (657).  Smooth two-foot metal plates
covered with wire netting  (658)  and tile-covered brick
walls four feet high in an enclosure 26 x  15 x 6 feet
(659)  are other cages that have been used to house armadillos,

Nutrition -

Armadillo diets vary, but a combination of animal and vege-
table material is the rule.  Canned dog food, raw beef,
milk,  eggs, liver and fruits are all desirable components.
One diet consisted of 1 1/2 cups water, 1/2 cup milk, three
hard-boiled eggs, two to three chopped bananas, one chopped
apple, one cup cat chow, one pound ground meat, and three
T multivitamins (657).  Other possible additions to the
general diet are tomatoes, cod-liver oil, mink Developer
Chow,  molasses, honey and potatoes (660).

Water should always be available.
                             213

-------
Care should be taken to provide sufficient vitamin K.  K-Sol
powder from Vet-a-mix, Inc., Shenandoah,  Indiana  is one
possible source  (660) .

Breeding/Rearing -

The gestation period of armadillos  is difficult to deter-
mine because the implantation of  the blastocyst is delayed
for a variable length of  time.  Polyembryony  has  also  been
reported in armadillos.   One to twelve  young  are  born,
usually in the spring (658, 661).

Only a few armadillos have been reared  under  zoological gar-
den conditions,  but  the Apelt Armadillo Farm  at Comfort,
Texas has bred the nine-handed armadillo in some  numbers
(658).

Special Needs -

Armadillos need  an abundant  floor covering of materials like
wood shavings, straw and  sand, or an earth  floor  (657, §58,
659)    Logs and large rocks allow for  scratching and  diggu;
which alleviates localized pyogenic infection of  claws and
footpads  (657).   Concrete floors are not desirable  (658).

Vitamin K is necessary to prevent major blood loss from
minor, superficial lacerations and can  be supplied by  the
inclusion of K-Sol powder in the  diet  (see Nutrition).


Armadillos are tropical  animals  and seem to be adversely
affected  by ambient  temperatures of less than 50°F (659) ••

A large source of water  is recommended  (657,  658, 659, 660).

Behavioral Restrictions  -

Small wooden cages cause undue  stress,  and metal enclosures
are  inadequate because of injury caused when the armadillo
digs at the sharp corners (657).

Armadillos  feed  at night in  nature and remain nocturnal in
captivity (659).   Red lights may be needed in the lab.
                                        #
Ecological Role  -

Armadillos  are  secondary consumers and scavengers.  They
consume many  insects and other terrestrial invertebrates
(412).    Their meat  is  edible,  but predators other than
men have  a  difficult time overcoming their armor.
                              214

-------
Longevity -

Nine-banded armadillos have lived over six years in captiv-
ity.  Other species have life spans of 10 to 15 years (658).

Problems with Mass Culture -

Armadillos require special caging and a lot of space  (657).
They often injure themselves during shipping and are very
susceptible to pyogenic infection of claws and footpads.
It is difficult to cleanse them thoroughly because of their
dermal plates and they are therefore more susceptible to
parasites.

Toxicity Testing -

Although toxicity studies with armadillos as subjects are
unknown, physiological research has been conducted which
may indicate the suitability of armadillos for such testing.
This research includes general hematological studies  (662,
663, 664, 665, 666).

General Suitability -

Depending on the caging facilities available, the armadillo
is more or less suitable for toxicological research.  Sur-
gical techniques are seriously hindered by the dermal skele-
ton (659) .

Ecological Alternatives -

     Moles
     Six-banded armadillo:  Euphractus sexcinctus
     La Plata three-banded armadillo:  Tolypeutes matacus
     Bolivian hairy armadillo:  Chaetophractus nationi
     Small hairy armadillo:  Chaetophractus vellerosus
     Pichiy:  Zaedyus pichiy
                            215

-------
Exotic Species

Introduction -

There are a number of exotic species used in research  in
the U.S.  Some are recent introductions  and some have  been
used for years.  The guinea pig  (Cavia)  has been used  in
medical research because of its  immune responses to  foreign
proteins and other somewhat unique metabolic characteristics.
Adults weigh between 850 to 1200 gms and are gentle  animals
that are very easy to handle.  Golden hamsters  (M.esocricetusi
and gerbils (Meriones) are closely related to rats and mice
(family Cricetidae) and somewhat similar in size and appear-
ance to smaller rodents, with a  body length of  about five
inches.  The lab rats and mice are of European  origin  and
are treated elsewhere.  Hamsters are natives of temperate
Europe and Asia.  There are three varieties used in  re-
search, the Golden, European and Chinese hamsters, but the
Golden is the most prominent in  research.  Gerbils are of
the same size as hamsters and of two varities,  African and
Mongolian.  The latter is more prominent in research.

Other exotic species that have been utilized as test ani-
mals are the hedgehog, the chinchilla, and the  sand  rat
(Psammomys obesus).  Because of  the more extensive use of
hamsters, gerbils and guinea pigs, the following text  will
concern itself primarily with these three animals.

Caging/Lab Conditions -

A cage 30 x 24 x 12 inches is ample space for a breeding
pair of guinea pigs and their unweaned offspring.  Smaller
enclosures (18 x 12 x 12 inches) are suitable for two
cagemates of any age.  Suggested bedding for guinea  pigs is
coarse wood shavings or shredded beet pulp.  Recommended
temperatures and relative humidity for the animal enclosures
are 68° to 72°F and 45 to 55 percent (289).

Hamster and gerbil breeding pairs and young do  well  in 20 x
10x6 inch cages made of almost any material.  A 24 x 24
x 8 inch cage is adequate space  for eight to ten adults.
Bedding of white pine shavings or some commercially  avail-
able substance is suggested and  should be changed frequently
Other possible bedding material  includes corn cobs,  beet
pulp, and peat moss about 65° to 75°F and 55 to 65 percent
humidity are very suitable conditions for the animal
enclosure (289, 667).  A good rule of thumb for housing
these animals is that 200 square inches  of floor space
                             216

-------
should be provided for a breeding pair and their litter.
In a communal situation, 15 square inches per individual
is adequate (668).

Nutrition -

A daily source of ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) is required by
guinea pigs, and it is reported that this species has a
high requirement for folic acid, thiamine, arginine and
potassium (669).  Commercial chow (35 gms/day) is an
adequate diet for guinea pigs if the above additions are
made (289) .

Adult hamsters need a daily ration of eight to ten gms of
food (which is commercially available), but females should
receive an extra two to four gms during pregnancy and lac-
tation (289).  Gerbil requirements are similar.  They have
been maintained on a diet of rolled oats, sunflower seeds,
and guinea pig chow supplemented with fresh vegetables  (667)
Both hamsters and guinea pigs need a constant supply of
water, but gerbils use very little  (668).

Breeding/Rearing -

The gestation period of guinea pigs is 59 to 67 days. Three
to four litters per year, averaging three offspring per
litter, are possible  (289).  The young can be weaned at 10
days.  Sexual maturity occurs at about five months; the
breeding life of guinea pigs lasts for up to five years.

The hamster's gestation period lasts 15 to 18 days, and
the average litter size is about seven young.  Females are
breedable immediately following parturition  (289).  In
eight to ten weeks they are sexually mature and can produce
offspring for about one year.

For gerbils, the gestation period is 24 to 26 days, and the
mean litter size is 4.5.  Sexual maturity is reached at
about 85 days  (667).  Best reproductive  results occur when
pairs of adults are kept separately  (668).

Special Needs -

Guinea pigs require Vitamin C daily, but this is included
in special guinea pig chow available commercially  (669).
                             217

-------
 Ecological Role -

 Guinea pigs,  hamsters and gerbils are all herbivores.  Guinea
 pigs are basically grass eaters; hamsters and gerbils are
 seed eaters.   All are possible prey species for predators
 of many kinds.

 Longevity -

 Guinea pigs live to about five years.  Gerbils and hamsters
 live from two to three years in captivity.

 Toxicity Testing -

 Substances have been tested on all of these species through
 food additives, vapor inhalation and topical application
 (449, 621, 670, 671, 672, 673, 674, 675, 676).  Substances
 tested include pesticides (670, 672, 677, 678, 679, 680,
 681), heavy metals (673, 674), carcinogens (682, 683) and
 gases of various types (626, 684, 685).

 General Suitability -

 Guinea pigs,  hamsters and gerbils are routinely maintained
 in laboratories and are very suitable as experimental ani-
 mals.  A number of qualities make some of them suitable for
 toxicity testing.   For instance, inbred guinea pigs exhibit
 very homogeneous sexual behavior, while heterogeneous ani-
 mals show great individual variations (686)   making possible
 quantitative  studies of behavioral responses  to toxic sub-
 stances.   It  should be noted that the homogeneity of the
 genetic background of these individuals could bias such
 testing.   Gerbils are 10 .times more sensitive, in terms of
 avoidance responses,  than lab rats (668)  and behavioral
 changes may be more discernible in gerbils than in other
 lab animals.   None of these species,  however, is native to
 North America;  they have been selectively bred to various
 extents for use as lab animals.  Therefore,  they are prob-
 ably less suitable than native species in studies which hope
 to extrapolate results to wild populations.

 Ecological Alternatives -

Voles, mice.
                             218

-------
SUGGESTED SPECIES
Synopsis sheets of the suggested species from each animal
subgroup have been prepared for use as quick reference
sources.  These sheets can be found in Appendix D.  The
information was largely taken from references used in the
text or from the references enumerated in the synopses
themselves.  Much general breeding and life history data
was acquired from texts concerned with specific animal
groups in the wild when there was no information available
from laboratory colonies (57, 133, 144, 196, 221, 310, 321,
330, 687, 688, 689, 690).  A summary list of suggested
species from terrestrial animal groups is found on Table 23

Final List

A further distillation has been made from the suggested
species for each group in order to identify terrestrial
animals that are best suited for use in laboratory
experiments.  These are recommended for use in cases where
ecological role, phylogenetic relationships and habitat
preferences are not of significant importance for certain
types of testing.  They represent good, all-around test
animals and are the most likely selections for preliminary
studies.  Most are frequently used species in many labs
at the present time.  The list of suggested species is
shown below in Table 22.

       Table 22.  FINAL LIST OF SUGGESTED SPECIES
        Gryllus sp.
        Drosophila sp.
        Musca domestica
        Tenebrio sp.

        Rana pipiens

        Anas platyrhynchos
        Columba livia
        Phasian'us colchicus
        Colinus vifginianus
        CoturnTx coturnix
        Gallus~gallus

        Mus Musculus

        Rattus norvegicus

        Canis familiaris
        Microtus pennsylvanicus
        Peromyscus maniculatus.
field cricket
fruit fly
house fly
mealworm

leopard frog

mallard duck
pigeon
ringnecked pheasant
bobwhite quail
Japanese quail
domestic chicken

house mouse - lab
              variety
norway rat  - lab
              variety
domestic dog
meadow vole
deer mouse
                            219

-------
TABLE  23.  LIST OF SUGGESTED SPECIES FROM SELECTED TERRESTRIAL ANIMAL GROUPS
INVERTEBRATES

Lumbricua terreatr-ia
Helix aeperea
Milax sf.
Araneua diadematua
Cry Hue penneylvanicue
Praying mantids
Blieeua l&uaoptefus
Leafhoppers
Triboliwn sp.
Tenebrio sp.
Carpocapea pomanella
Agrotia ypeilon
Husaa domestiaa
Drosophila me1a.noga.atev
Apis melifera
Isopods
Centipedes

XERPETOFAUNA

Sana pipiens
Ambyetoma mexiaanum
Terrapene sp.
Chelydra eerpsntina
Anolie aarolinenaie
Phrynoeoma aornutum
Thamnophie eirtalie
Elaphe sp.

AVES

Phalaerocorax auritus
Podilymbus podiaepe
Anat platyrhynahoa
Branta canadensis
Puffinus grieeus
Caemerodiue albus
Fuliaa ameriaana
Philohela minor
Larua argentatue
Melanerpee erythroaephalua
Faleo aparverius
Tyto alba
Columba livia
Colinue virginianua
Phaeianua oolohicua
Dendragupus obecurue
Heloepiza melodia
Riohmondena eardinalia
Turdua migratoriua
Sturnue vulgaria
Paaaer domeatioua
CalT.ua gallua
Coturnix coturnix
Helopaittaoua undulatua
MAM'HALS
        brevicauda
EpteeiouB fueaue
Sylvilague floridanua
Dip'odomys ordi
Seotoma lepida
Orysomye paluetrie
Spermophilu3 beeoheyi
Eutanias minimue
Tamiae etriatue
Hiorotus pennaylvanicus
Peromyacua maniculatua
Hue m-uaculua
Rattuo norvegicue
Myocaeter coypua
Vulpee vulpea   . •
Mustela vieon
Muatela putoriua
Cania familiaria
Miniature swine (Sue)
Ovie sp.
Odoooileus virginianua
Odoooileue hemionue
Saimiri eaiureue
Didelphis mareupialie
Daeypue novemeinctua
                                            220

-------
Selection of Animal Species for Testing

In toxicity testing, habitat and ecological role are often
considered important in the selection of species.  The
Trophic Triangle shown in Figure 22 represents the basic
food chain/ an important factor in determining the eco-
logical role of a potential subject species.  Decomposers
are associated with the substrate, which is an accumulation
of organic detritus.  At this level, waste products, and
dead plant and animal material are decomposed and their
nutrients made available to the primary producers, the
vegetation.  From the plant level, herbivores, omnivores,
secondary and top carnivores, in turn, utilize foods from
their own level or the ones below.  This triangle shows the
trophic level and the general habitats of the suggested
species on that level.

Suggested species, their place in the Trophic Triangle, and
preferred habitat are shown in Table 24.  This table can be
of particular importance in the selection of species for
use in multispecies test systems.  For instance, if it is
desired to assess the impact of a chemical which has con-
taminated a forest, forest species can be selected from
each food chain and animal group  (if suitable species from
each are identified).

The following is a hypothetical system constructed in this
fashion.
Top Carnivore
A Possible Multispecies System

   Vulpes vulpes
   Falco sparverius
Secondary Carnivore    Mustela vison
Omnivore
Herbivore
Decomposer
     Melanerpes erythrocephalus
     praying mantids
     Rana pipiens
   Didelphis virgenianus
   Sturnus vulgaris
   Oryzomys palustris
   Colinus virginianus
   Terrapene
   Helix aspersa
   Lumbricus~ terrestris
   Isopods
Of course,  in order to achieve this level of testing much
                             221

-------
UJ
_J
a
o

3:
o.
o
ui
cr


















•a
c
a
cr

*3


o
rH
O
e

.-4

U
"-*

o
n
O
w

t-4
2

c
o
u








o
>
-H
5
10
u

a


i

<


o

o
> X'

c o


0 r) *>
u u
>i a 

c
I

1

U
^
>

ja

a:

i

Q
5)
C/3


,
M




^
t:


.
rg














0)
u
o
n
Q.
E
O
U
o

1

a







y
u
c

w
u
r,
^
^

JJ


A
flj

                                                           222

-------

tn
ti in
O 3
1 O
0 -r!
b. ti
1
3
CJ iJ
tl
4J

ID

Q)
4J

tl
O
3
X

t4
a
o
—





tn
in
3
cn
V4 10
U rH
O >
b. rH
W
3
C
ra
a

ti
o
4-4
r-l

10
•P Ul
C 3
O -P
(Cott
Micro
0
^i
ti
o
I tn
o -a
Jj O
a
0
ul
W M

in
3
o
H
c
fl

H
3

Ł
C
11
Q


, — ,

rH
to in
> 3
CO
3 rH
O -H
(Mead
Odoco










	 .
ti
tu
o
tn
3
C
10
H
C
H
Cr
ti
r4

tn

H C
a o
•P -H

4J (U
rt X
— 0













(0
tn
-* t4
t4 d)
cj a
fl) tn
TJ 10

11) X
rH -H
.e'o
t— C



H

(0 •
c a
tn w tn
— 3
t) x a* tn
c « a in
10 -H^-i -r-4
rH -HIM rH












tl) " O
rH X-H
in
3
t4
0)

0.
o
o
3
O
rH
4J 4-1 -H
o tn O tn
co ti to 10 B a
j3 o in rn >•
a a.rH cr
x a to o c tn
u o o c H -H
C X O 0 r-l 4-1
H u-i a E -a o
x io ti o o ti
u tu to o4 o cr
tn
-~ 3
C O
4J -H
o c
Ł 10
Ł>
•3 -H
H in >
3 3 tn
4-1 rH C
U rH C
0 >- 0)
c ti a
— o


.

tn

--~ S

0) -H
^ -H
(eric
Tribo













at

-u a.

o
A 0
•H

3 J3
O 0
•-H C
— E-i










(D
r-t KJ
-U O
s o e
Cr-t Q O
H RJ t TJ
--t O V4
.y e u n
l-i 1 O
fa u o tn
-a O fa 3
— E















	 	
>, ra
— 1 .-H

_c
a> u
W 0
3 W
0 0
S. lH
— a












fd
i-t
a
*j
v.
rt

O
c
d
a
E
•M
a


•— i 1— i

I-
-P E
•H
II
                                                                                                                                                         C  -
                                                                                                                                                         O 3
                                                                                                                                                         H H
                                                                                                                                                         a o
                                                                                                                                                         Ui N
                                                                                                                                                         H >
V M
a— 3
ta a a
•-! C
(!)
C
O
o a
b. 10
cr ti
< 0
H
4J Or
ti -a
3 C

O B
x i x
o o o

10

3
•o
c
3
10 -^
•4 •**: U ft
-t HI -H 3
fO fl) 4J -H
ti j^ in ti
4J 10 CJ -H
m ti 'Jl E E
3 <0 -r4 O -H
< a>la to
— ol— w

14
3
u
tn
«— 1 *•»
5) >,
t4 O
ti X
H C
3 O
cr e
tn
OO

1 — ' 3


Px S w x
00 0 «
a § g
UJ m <
Jrr 2 w
CO -*
y g H

SŁ D
7^ K
CO .-^
0 Q
CO S
a s
QJ
01
0)

tl
Q)
C
10
O rH
b4 U
Ł
QJ
o
o
Ui
Ł
4->

V4
U




^^
•a u
0) CJ
T3 X
n u
o o
& c

•a c
aJ o
^ 3



to U, I
3p 3
cfc a
•H 3 u
BE g
•Hla e
^C BI*rH
t_) Ul
i— i b

O C
rj 5
§ i
X 01
m
ti a

i 1
fa -U
3
W

^f*

tfl <-t
a ai
O T3
1- 1 -i-t
~Q


01
H
_j
(C
^.






01
3
a.
(Q

* 11
^

C
QJ
Q




^^

3
in





a'
m
tn
3

3
U
n
XJ
o
3
O
ti
IT

^
-
-1
a



i
3
C

n
3

tnlu
3 c
Ul &4
O >i
C, M
0 -0
H
D
in
-H
a

o
T3
- tl O
i) o -a in
= w C 3
) H 3 E
1) rH O O
I) to k4 Q ul
3 CJ tP 3
— 2





tn
3
c
fl
H
tn
3
c

rH
o
c
H
o
H
H
>
u

tn
3
o
-H
— cr
U 01
01 ~s
•3 tl
0 O
E C

-U
10
tl


a inla







0
4.
^

3
ii
0
B
~


tn
H
—1
r4
~
10
M








u
tn :
3 t
C r
R) ^



X i
a.








in 33 m^~
3 jj U-H[DI
0 4J 0 CO
x to 2 raw
— csPop
to
-H


rH
fl)
6
0 .* ^~-
3 O JJ tO
J O C N
•1 C <0 -H
" i in a
J CT> flj ^
i C CJ O
J H S: rH
J tl CL CJ
C X
CJ -r-l
X C
~~ O tl
3 tn
0 3
tl rH
tl rH
fO 10
D, CT
Ul
tn
CP 3
C 0 rH
O . a rH
in it)
r* 3
X 4-1
U 0
o
0
^ X
-t-J -H
« c
OJ !H
6 3
O -n
r» o


.-H
H
CJ
3 Ul
tr 3
tn
1) 0) 3
in a u
aj i in
C ±4 >
fl O Ł
D, 1 O
(TJ O -M
"""5 fa »
JJ
l—t
3
u
•H
C
rj
e
— 2t— 01— o — e.
r-- tn
4J O
e
torius
Q 3
i a
cr
< 13

ti iH
C3 4J
i tn
O 3
01 X
H O
> c
t4 >
t! X
^ U

C 4J

fl) rH
a, ' a
o cr
ti < tn
a c

Ul
3
(Q
4J
c
a.

o w

tn
•H
-— ,u
r-t ffj
^T1 O 3
G >

COW
fO —i fa 3
.-t tnl^ t c
.-H 3|L, L, U
fl k4| CJ O 3
E -TJLC -t>

LQ
"n
Ł


Ł





,-^
OJ
en
3
c


V4
o
t
TJ


tn
3
u
i-4
4J
CJ

Q
"O

Ll
Passe:






tn
3
d
c
u
o
.3



t.


o
ffl

tn


s
I




•a
CJ
4J
o
0 .-
4-4 CJ

5) 3
4J 0
H E
X
3










_)
ra
<
0)
id

3
(0
u
Ul
3
o
a:
o

M
t-
u
b]
tn

rH
•r4
^
0)
M
M .Q
O
1 Q
O C
fa -H
lH
«a

CQ
a
c

o
•H
14
Q)
r;
10

,4<
2
w

H
U

M
O
n. H
r 1' r 1
3
b.
U)
3
4J
to

O
•a

•H
•a

S M
9) 3
tl  o-
10 -H
CO B

1 Ul
J3 3
tl T)
0 tl
— 3












C
•H
.Q
O
tl








tn
. 1
_!•
a
— o

n . i i~
t) •''. ni
o x
— t-i




n
•a
H
4J
C
10
S

CP
c
-H
>,
10










,4
H
tO
-p

.1
m

tn
r4
m
c
9)
C
•r4
,H

tl
O-
o

Ul
•H
rH
0




tn
CO
^:
IO
r;
tn

tl
u
4J
tl
•0

—
E
3
4J
3
C

fl) O
rH O
O
§ifl
e
0
c tu in
CJ 0 0
fl) C
tl >,
C- V4
— X
tO
r —
~ -rl 0
Ul 4J H
•a c u
tl fl) tl
io a 3
N tl 4J
-4 8)

(14 C
•a i c H
o tr ti a.
c < -a Ca
U >- 10
0 rH C
X fl) Ul
— x —
o. u

tl
o

Q] -H
0 E

u.'ni «i
tn t; r-i
Ul CJ
ClI X
X 4J 0
tiim . i
•Ol.l .1
r-ih- 0 X
bll tu C.
o
a
1 C
tr o
>< in
— 1 -H

O ''I
o i a
0 0 r-l
T3 CM CJ
O |>
U V!
3-3
— ta T,
en
O







^
H
4-> O
O bi
rH
0
X



1 0
o
t4
5
^«-
V4
CJ
ai
o
a
V4
HI
c


a
2
O
a.
Jr4
0
o
to
3
"to
c
a

t4 C m
o ra 3
in
3


ti
3
fS
1 tl C
a o s
rH E >
ja ti -.
3 O r-
O U T3
n 0
— —
rH 0 CJ rH —. tl
E.1H-Q -f 3IXfO
QlO CJ fl
col I t, D
o rrr to c

T) rri *— i
in

CJ
m
,4
o!>. -i ^-
Ci j^— 3
Ł.
to t4 >io a
>. 3 C >H m
J t, I Kl
O 13 O CO tj O
Oil b. CJO 0
:l f. -il ti rH
R<— J'. J — 0
>l b.
~
3
to
c

3 to
0 J3
tl r-l
tl -0
tO
ao
n 4J
— >,
H

-------
preliminary work on lab maintenance must be done on many
species.  For example, in Table 24, few carnivores are
listed.  They are generally large animals and difficult to
feed in captivity, and very few attempts have been made to
use them in any type of testing.  Traditionally, omnivores
and herbivores are most often used as test subjects, and
their numbers are greater both in the laboratory and in
nature.  See Appendix C for suppliers of some suggested
species.  (Considerable changes may have occured in this
list as it dates to 1971.)

It is suggested that testing in the near future utilize the
List of Species, shown on Table 24, but that serious re-
search be initiated to develop other potentially valuable
species, in order that an efficient, ecologically meaning-
ful, multispecies test program can be initiated.  The state
of toxicity testing cannot develop as it should without
research of this kind.
                            224

-------
                        SECTION V

                       METHODOLOGIES
INTRODUCTION

Webster defines scientific method as "a systematic procedure,
technique, or mode of inquiry" employed by the scientific
community.  It goes on to add that it is a "way, technique,
or process of or for doing something".  A standard procedure
and methodology are tools which help the experimenter achieve
reproducible results.  In this section, the methodologies
available for use in toxicological testing will be reviewed
and an assessment will be made of the suitability of each
for use in toxicology studies.  Previous use and results
obtained, applicability to wild North American animal
species, experts opinions, and expense are the fundamental
criteria used for determining suitability.  Suggestions for
further use are often included in the text.
General Scientific Procedure

Toxicological experimental procedures consist of  two basic
steps:  exposure of  the test animal to the test substance
and analysis of the  results.  Exposure techniques, though
they may seem straightforward to the layman, have an
important effect on  results.  Some standard, specific
routes of exposure for laboratory research include:
a)  injection

     1)  intravenous  (i.v.)
     2)  intra peritoneal  (i.p.)
     3)  intra muscular  (i.m.)
     4)  into egg yolk  (birds)

b)  oral exposure

     1)  blended  in  food
     2)  in loaded food items
     3)  in water
     4)  intubation  (force feed)

 c)   topical application

     1)  dermal
     2)  ocular
     3)  in bedding
                             225

-------
d)   in air  (vaporized)

The  route of exposure should be chosen on the basis of the
test animal's size and  anatomy, and in accordance with the
manner in which the animal will possibly encounter the
substance under natural conditions.   (Dosages are also
discussed under Section III, Special  Problems).

The  second major step in testing  is analysis of the results.
Analytical procedures available to the scientist are
discussed under two catagories:   Physical/Chemical and
Behavioral Methodologies.

Selection of Categories

Selection of these two  categories was a difficult task.
As the reader will realize, there is  considerable over-
lapping between categories; however,  the divisions allow
for  a more thorough treatment of  all  possible methods and
also facilitate use of  tables which describes the metho-
dologies available (see Table 25).  See Figure 23 for
interrelationships of Physical/Chemical methods.

Another problem in organization was that certain metho-
dologies are specific technical procedures  (e.g.Chromato-
graphy, Histology) while others are general methods of
scientific experimentation (e.g.  Physiology, Population
Dynamics) in which the  specific techniques can be used.
Further distinctions on this point can be found in the
text for each category.

Physical/Chemical Tables

There is a natural division between physical and behavioral
test methods.  For this reason, and because of the volume of
information, it seemed  advisable  to separate the literature
into physical and behavioral methodologies.  In the case of
stress, an entry has been made in both tables because it
affects both physical and behavioral aspects of animals.
(See Behavioral Methods for further discussion.)

The  tabular presentation of methodologies shown in Table 25
has been developed for  a number of reasons.  First, it
simplifies the presentation of a  great number of methodo-
logies, and pinpoints areas of concentrated study by showin?
the  amount of information available for each area.  It also
suggests which methods  are not frequently used for a given
group.   References were gathered with toxicological testing
as the primary objective,  and the methodologies selected
reflect this.
                            226

-------
However, the selection was not limited to toxicological
testing, because certain "unrelated" methodologies may
prove quite suitable for such work.
                             227

-------
                             TABLE 25.  METHODOLOGY:   PHYSIOLOGICAL
INVERTEBRATES
Worms
Snails and
 Allies
Spiders and
 Allies
Insects
  H
  a
u a
a c
•H o
,-t H
•H H
U
ft
n
u
a
&
                                                               Vl
                                                               •P
          N
          B
          a
                             905
                             112
                                             63,
                                             64
                                                                        Sg
                                                                         s
                                  27,30
                                  34,35,
                                  39,54,
                                  130,336,
                                  691,692,
                                  693
                                  39

                                  695


                                  322,700
General
 Arthropods

HERPS
Snakes
Lizards

Alligators
Turtles

Amphibians



BIRDS
Pelican and
 Cormorant
Loons and
 Grebes
Waterfowl
Shearwaters
 and Petrets
Herons and
 Ibis
Cranes, Rails,
 and Coots
Woodcock
Gulls and
 Terns
Woodpeckers
717,
718
                 176,
                 177,
                 711,
                 712,
                 713
                 141 ,
                 712
                                 141,
                                 744
                                                                      714,
                                                                      715
                                                 148
                                 148

                                 139,148,
                                 719,720,
                                 721,722
                             195
                                                                      199,200,
                                                                      203,209
                                                                      211,283,
                                                                      723
                                  235,236
                                               O to
                                               ~H O
                                               •U-l
                                               a a

                                               II
                                                                                 32
                                                             50

                                                             54,56,696,
                                                             697,698,699

                                                             35,39,50,72,7:
                                                             76,78,84,85,
                                                             96,108,115,
                                                             123,124,329,
                                                             336,701,702,
                                                             703,704,705,
                                                             706
                                                             50,130,707,
                                                             708,710
                                                                                 174
                                                            174,716
                                             185

                                             193,197,201,
                                             276,233,724,
                                             725,726,727
                                             185,222
                                                            38,229,230

                                                            185,231

                                                            238
                                              228

-------
                          TABLE 25.  METHODOLOGY:  PHYSIOLOGICAL
                                        (CONTINUED)
                      8,
                    M 0)
                    e c
                    •H «
                    r-l 14
                    •H frl
                    u
         n
         0
         M
         4J
         cn
                                    4J
                                    O
                                91
                                C.
                                 01

                                 I

                                 I
                                  s§
                                  §s
                                       a E
                                       rl O
                                       3 C
                                       O Q
                                       Q.
Raptors
Doves and
 Pigeons
Bobwhite Quail

Pheasant
Miscellaneous
 Galliformes
Perching
 Granivores

Perching
 Insectivores
Perching
 Omnivores

Domestic
 Gallifonnes
Japanese
 Quail
Exotics
                       728
                               729,
                               730
        302
                                        732,
                                        733
                                         311,
                                         315,
                                         643
358,
359
        256
374,
742,
743

394
                                            389
                                               283
                                       283,293
                                       314
                                                                    199,314
                               37


                               199,347,
                               738,739,
                               740

                               283,744,
                               745
                                                                    283,293
                                          276,282,283,
                                          286,368,731

                                          282,283,267,
                                          290,291,301,
                                          303,734,735,
                                          736

                                          308,312
                                                   38,238,333,
                                                   337,737

                                                   225,238,339,
                                                   741
                                  201,283,368,
                                  369,370,371,
                                  746,747,748,
                                  749,750,751

                                  283
                                262
MAMMALS

Moles and
 Shrews
Bats
Rabbits and
 Hares
Desert Rodents
Wild Rats
Ground Squirrels
Chipmunks, Tree
  Squirrels
Voles and
  Allies
Deermice and
  Allies
Lab Mice
  and Rats
                754
                        755,
                        756
                                757
                                        438

                                        447,448,
                                        452,580,
                                        677,758
331,'
985
348

256,
532,
766,
767,
768,
769,
770
682,
771,
772,
773,
774,
775
64,
393,
776,
777,
778,
779,
780,
781,
782
                783
                                                460
447,448
536,540,
545,677,
681 ,758,
760,784,
785,786,
787,788,
789,790,
791,792,
793
                                           88,423,752,753

                                           430,435

                                           445,759,760
                                                           493,498,517,
                                                           761,762
                                                           332,517,763
5,19,445,543,
761,774,794,
800,801,802,
303,804,805,
806,807,808,
809,810,811,
812
                                             229

-------
                             TABLE 25.  METHODOLOGY:   PHYSIOLOGICAL
                                          (CONTINUED)
                       4J              -H               *                              On
                       H              41               -H         >i       V.U          -H O
a                                      a               n         n       o o          4i-H
                                      n        no         -u       >4J          a e
                     M a       n      -r>        o       .e         g       U-H          *j 5
                     B q       a      a        E       •u         e       «c          3 c
                     ,4 o       4)      O        SO         W       « O          ft^
                     ^IM       vj      a)        N       o         •->       as          OQ
                     •HH       4JDS        Cg         
-------
                            TABLE 25.  METHODOLOGY:  PHYSIOLOGICAL
                                         (CONTINUED)
                                                      Z
                                                      g       a
                 g.                                    »       "2
                 5                      e             c       -•
                 g1
                 a      -H       wo              o
                 O      »~l               C       >1     r-*
O        H-HO       O      -H       e      O
                 «J30        O+J
                                        •
                               a        x)      u      u
                               a        «      c      -H
INVERTEBRATES   O(2o        S     •»      3       XWinw

Worms           77     29,    49,
                       77     834,
                              835

Snails                        834                                    836           46,47,48,
                                                                                   837,838
Spiders and
 Allies

Insects         77,    80,    71,83,  67,69,  12,     65,     113                  70,862
                234,   125,   111,    73,74,  116,    127,
                839    126    834,    82,94,  117,    841,
                              840,    95,     119,    858,
                              841,    108,    128,    859,
                              842     131,    849,    860,
                                      741,    850/    861
                                      843,    851,
                                      844,    852,
                                      845,    853,
                                      846,    854,
                                      847,    855,
                                      848     856,
                                              857

General                54,
 Arthropods            147

HERPS

Snakes                                                                      863
Lizards                                                              864    863

Alligators
Turtles                                                                     863

Amphibians             147,   150,            12,                           870,   873,872,
                       865    155,            154                           871    873,874,
                              866,                                                 875,876
                              867,
                              868,
                              869

BIRDS

Pelican and            185,
 Cororaoran t            249,
                       877

Loons and              185
 Grebes
Waterfowl       234,   276    207,            198,            113
                276           212,            879
                              877,
                              878

Shearwaters            216,   218                              217
 and Petrels           877

Herons and             185
 Ibis
                                             231

-------
                            TABLE  25.   METHODOLOGY:  PHYSIOLOGICAL
                                           (CONTINUED)
                                                         0)
                                                         a
                                                         a
                                                         n       a
                  >t                                      o       o>
                  X!                                      4J       -H      >,
                  a*                                      a       o      en
                  a                                      u       9      o              >
                  n                      e               c       41      -i              b>
                  tji              aao-Hcao              o
                  O       •      >l       -H        OrH              C       >1     r-l
                  4J       fl)      RJ       r-4       -HO       O*H       gO
                  10       3      01       O       -UXI       •HhO-4
                  S             41       c.      ti       15     Ł
                          54)     -H       O       O      C       OB
-------
                            TABLE 25.  METHODOLOGY:   PHYSIOLOGICAL
                                          (CONTINUED)
                                                        "                                     a       u
                  g-                                     n       >o       &
                  tt                      B        ,       c       3       °            &!
                  u*             tutau-Hino            o
                  O       O      >,       .H        Ort               C     >i      Ł
                  B       3      §       "n        "Jj°       -S             "^      °
                  fi      *O      TO       .U        fl>      U       **       U     4J      n
                  0-j«        •)        C-4       «OO>i
                  ^t«O       -P        O4J       CUaJCjC


Rabbits and            452     626,     640      911,             152,           754,   608,917
 Hares                         909,             912,             914            915,   918,919,
                               910              913                            916    920,921
Desert Rodents
Wild Rats                      475      466                             477,
                                                                      479
Ground Squirrels                                               486                   922

Chipmunks, Tree                                                                     488,907
 Squirrels

Voles and                              466      6,                      498,    502
 Allies                                        507                     762,
                                                                      923,
                                                                      924
Deermice and                                                                        907
 Allies

Lab Mice        619    925     386,     96,      9,116    858,   113,387,  477,    754,   831,848,
 and Rats                      522,     256,     519,     969,   401,557,  479,    979,   919,920,
                               541,     393,     538,     961    784,792,  793,    980,   935,946,
                               926,     617,     805,           914,948,  975,    983,   985,986,
                               927,     640,     912,           951,952,  976,    982,   988,989,
                               928,     679,     952,           961,962,  977,    983,   990,99],
                               929      767,     953,           963,964,  978    984    992,993,
                                       930,     954,           966,967,                995,996,
                                       931,     955,           968,969,                997,998
                                       932,     956,           970,971,
                                       933,     957,           972,973,
                                       934,     958,           974
                                       935,     959
                                       936,
                                       937,
                                       938,
                                       940,
                                       941,
                                       942,
                                       943,
                                       944,
                                       945,
                                       946,
                                       947,
                                       948,
                                       949,
                                       950,
                                       951

Large
 Herbivores
Large                  625                                            560,
 Carnivores                                                           561
Small                  582             999                             3000
 Carnivores
                                              233

-------
                           TABLE 25.  METHODOLOGY:  PHYSIOLOGICAL
                                        (CONTINUED)
                  I
                  
-------
                             TABLE  25.   METHODOLOGY:  PHYSIOLOGICAL
                                           (CONTINUED)
                 ,
                81
                *-\
                B
INVERTEBRATES

Worms

Snails
 and Allies

Spiders
 and Allies

Insects
General
 Arthropods

HERPS

Snakes

Lizards

Alligators

Turtles

Amphibians
BIRDS

Pelicans
 and
 Cormorants

Loons
 and Grebes

Waterfowl

Shearwaters
 and Petrels

Herons  and
 Ibis

Cranes, Rails
 and Coots

Woodcock

Gulls and
 Terns

Woodpeckers

Raptors
         I
         a
         cu
                                    tn
                                    O
                                   "I
                                   1032
                               &
                               o
                                 o
                                 rH
                                 8
                66
172
1035

169,1035



1035

151,873
                             1038

                             165

                             872
186
192,205
                             205,213
         202
                             188,232,
                             237
 240,247, 202
 1045
                                187,188,
                                232,400,
                                1042,1043
                                217,219


                                1044


                                223


                                227
                                188,236,
                                237,243,
                                244,388,
                                1046,
                                ]047,
                                1048,
                                1049
                                                     134,
                                                     844,
                                                     ]Q33
                                                                               36
                                                       36,89.
                                                       F61.1034
                                                                                178,179,1036

                                                                                1036,1037

                                                                                1039

                                                                                ]036
                                                                      140,
                                                                      1040,
                                                                      1041
                                                      226
                                               235

-------
                               TABLE 25.   METHODOLOGY:   PHYSIOLOGICAL
                                            (CONTINUED)
                 Cn
                 O
                           O
                           f'
                                     bl
                                     O
                     a
                     J3
                     c.
                                                o
                                                -u
                                            &
                                            o
                           a
                           n
                                       3
                                       o
Doves  and
 Pigeons
Bobwhite
 Quail

Pheasant

Miscellaneous
 Galliformes
251,258,
259,260
323
         295
                   300
            257,260,
            1050
                                         294,299
                                   1051


                                   1051,1052

                                   1053,1054
Perching
 Granivores
Perching
 Insectivores

Perching
 Oranivores

DomestJr-
 Galliformes
Japanese
 Quail
328
372
                                         188
         1055
                             351
                 399
                                              399
355,356,
371,399,
405,1056,
1057,1058,
1059,1060,
1061,1062,
1063,1064
382,389,
392,396,
400,736,
1066,
1067
363,365,
366,1065
Exotics

MAMMALS

Moles and
 Shrews
                                                                1068,1069
Bats
Rabbits and
 Hares
Desert
 Rodents

Wildrats

Ground
 Squirrels

Chipmunks,
 Tree Squirrels
446,449,
450,451,
671,
1070,1071
918,919,
1072
                                                                       1073
442,831,
1051,1074
                                                                3075,1076
                                               236

-------
                              TABLE. 25.  METHODOLOGY:  PHYSIOLOGICAL

                                           (CONTINUED)
                           o
                           a
                           «J

                           04
                                      &
                                      o
                                      i-4
                                      O
                                      o
                                      0

                                      A
                                      0.
                                               &

                                               O
o
as
Voles and
Allies
Deermice
and Allies
Lab Mice
and Rats
Large
Herbivores
Large
Carnivores
Small
Carnivores
Domestic
C arnivores
Horse and
Allies
Swine and
Allies
Sheep and
Allies
Deer and
Allies
Primates
Opossum
Armadillo
Exotics


387,522,
775,805,
925,
1066,
1078,
1079,
1080



110,369,
780,805

601,621

631,1105

654
449,671,
1115


544, 869,956
775,
831,
1006,
1081,
1082,
1083,
1084,
1085,
1086,
1087



586,1006




634 1110
652,1111
1055,
1136
1077

539,805,
919,1088,
1089,
1090,
1091,
1092,


1100
805,819,
919,1083
608
608,611,
614,615,
1103
608


651,1028,
1112,1113
663,664,
665,666
608,1072,
1113,1117
                                                                     538,1093
This includes shell  thinning,

hatchability, growth rate,

mortality.



See also Oology.
                                                                     570
                                                                     1104
                                                                     641
                                                                     674
                                                                                     JZ

                                                                                     .U

                                                                                     O
                                                                                626,685,

                                                                                1094,1095,

                                                                                1096
                                                                                1097





                                                                                33,1098,1099





                                                                                33












                                                                                33,594





                                                                                604
                                                                                1106,3107,

                                                                                1108,1109



                                                                                635,773,831



                                                                                655,656,1134
                                                                               677,831,3135,

                                                                               3338
8
                                             This includes handling, immobilizing,

                                             application techniques, methods of capture,

                                             techniques for assessment, c3ean-up procedure

                                             and instrumentation.
                                              237

-------
233

-------
PHYSICAL/CHEMICAL METHODS
Ciliary Transport

The structure and function of cilia are generally consistent.
They are usually engaged in the transport of minute part-
icles or secretions.  For instance, in the respiratory tract
of higher animal groups, the cilia transport mucous which
serves as a lubricant and a natural defense mechanism.

Studies of cilia involve a determination of the rate of
flow in "normal" tissue and of the changes that may occur
under the influence of an irritant, e.g. gas.  Both in vivo
and in vitro experiments have been devised (359, 765)and
model systems have been developed for mucous flow and
ciliary activity (764).  The procedures used are either
surgical, to view in vivo tissue, or extration of epithelial
tissue for an in_ vitro  analysis.  These studies yield
reliable measures of the effects of gaseous toxicants or
"caustic" liquid.

In previous work (358, 765, 818) chickens and domestic lab
mammals have been used, but because cilia are found in
various systems in many animals, this method could con-
ceivably be utilized on other forms.

Evaluation - Changes in ciliar transport mechanisms can
directly affect necessary functions of related systems
(immunology, food transport) and, if they can be correlated
with reduced vitality, increased illness, reduction in
growth rates, etc. they can be considered significant.

Stress

In a sense, every.environmental or physiological alteration
is a stress.  Physiological systems (e.g. adrenocortico -
thyroid system in mammals) have been developed by animals
to cope with stress, modifying physiological functions by
feedback in order to cope with the change (770).  They can
be affected by many factors (including toxic chemicals) and
the result is often a "less fit" organism.  It is this
reasoning that has led some researchers to test the effects
of stress on subjects previously exposed to a toxic substance.
The effects of stress on exposed animals when compared to
controls is a valid measure of toxicity.
                             239

-------
An advantage of stress testing is that it gives results
which can be extrapolated to a population in nature exposed
to changes in temperature, food availability, day length,
disturbances, social stresses, molting, migration patterns,
etc.  (256).  Stress testing does not require expensive
equipment nor advanced technology.

Stress testing has used starvation on exposed lab rats  (768),
(Peromyscus maniculatus)  (348),(Coturnix)  (394) , chickens
(374, 742, 743), and pheasants  (302).  Temperature stress
has also been used  (694, 767, 769).  These two methods  are
the most frequently employed; however, isolation stress
(532), revolving drum stress  (766) , and the introduction of
pathogens to exposed subjects (195) have also been used.
The possibilities are innumerable.

Evaluation - Stress testing offers a look at the effects of
a toxic substance on animals under conditions that might be
met in nature.  It is applicable to all animals that can be
maintained in the lab.   (See Behavioral Methods - Stress).
(For a review of stress - physiology see reference 770).

Respiration

In respiration experiments where study of ciliar transport
is not the objective, the study generally focuses on the
toxicity of gaseous substances measured by physiological
and anatomical parameters.  Vapors are usually introduced
into a closed chamber containing the test subject by passing
a controlled amount of air over the emitting liquid.
Periodic sampling/monitoring of the inner atmosphere veri-
fies the gas concentration.  Apparatuses are all of the same
basic plan (626, 773) , but highly complex equipment has been
designed for specific uses (such as the study of turtle
respiration - described in reference 718).  Long-term,
repeated, or continuous exposure is used with less toxic
substances or with those usually encountered in low con-
centrations  (771, 772, 773).

Postexposure analysis can include examination of the gross
anatomy of lungs and other body organs (682, 773), histo-
pathologic scrutiny of the respiratory tract  (773), serum
and liver enzyme analyses (773), and observation of
behavioral changes  (626, 682).

Previous subjects in respiration experimentation have been
typical lab species—mice, rats, guinea pigs, rabbits, dogs/
goats, pigs,  monkeys—but the technique should prove easily
                            240

-------
adaptable to all forms of animal life, even those organisms
which respire largely through their outer integument (i.e.
Helminths).

The methods described here are limited to the testing of
gaseous or airborn substances.  In the case of particulate
matter, mists or aerosols can be used.  Determination of
the concentration of the test substance in the air is made
difficult when particles of varying sizes occur in the
test atmosphere.  Particles of unit density are considered
in these instances.   (A caution concerned with interpre-
tation of results - gases and particulate matter can be
inhaled and swallowed as well.) (803).

Evaluation - Respiration experiment techniques are an
excellent route of exposure and can be used to dose animals
for further physical and behavioral tests.

Enzymes

Enzymes are organic catalysts which, like their inorganic
counterparts, function in "the lowering of the activation
energy of a reaction  (resulting in) a faster attainment of
the equilibrium point.  Presumably all reactions of any
degree of complexity occurring in living cells are catalyzed
by a specific enzyme.  Thus the integrity of the enzyme
population of a cell or organism is paramount to its well
being"  (1119).  Enzymes occur in most living tissue, but
those of the liver have received special study because most
metabolism of ingested materials takes place in this
organ  (393, 778).

Almost any enzyme level can be determined in any tissue if
its activity can be measured under controlled conditions.
Review articles on liver microsomal enzymes are available
(777, 780) and entire books have been written on enzyme
methodology.  However, biochemical procedures are often
exacting and require an experienced technician.  Likewise,
the necessary equipment is expensive.  While the results
of enzyme testing give an exact measure of the direct
effect of the test substance, interpreting the indirect
effects may be more difficult.  For instance, the stimulation
of an enzyme may cause biochemical side effects that are not
directly related to the test substance.  Enzyme inhibition
can do the same.  In order to evaluate the activity of an
enzyme and determine the effect of any change in concen-
tration, it is necessary to know the activity of its
products and their subsequent reactions.
                            241

-------
 Evaluation  -  Enzyme  studies  can  show variations  in levels
 and  activity,  but  their  real value  can  only be realized
 when it is  possible  to correlate enzyme changes  with changes
 in vital metabolic processes.

Anesthesia

 The  administration of  anesthesia to animals can  be risky,
 especially  when little is  known  about the effects  of an
 anesthetic  on a relatively new species  of animal in the lab.
 The  effects of an  anesthesia might  change as a result of the
 subjects exposure  to a toxic substance.

 Evaluation  -  Anesthesia/narcosis can be a good test
 method in itself when  used as a  stress  but unless  the
 compound used is potentially an  environmental contaminant
 the  results would  not  be directly applicable to  natural
 stresses.   However,  reduced  tolerance  induced by  a toxic
 substance to  any anesthetic  may  be  an indication of reduced
 tolerance to  other man-made  chemicals possibly found in
 nature.

 Telemetry

 The  monitoring of  radio tagged animals  has been used for
 some years  by wildlife researchers  to determine the movements
 and  body temperatures  of free ranging individuals.  Grouse
 (311, 315), pheasants  (732,  733), ducks  (825), and large
 mammals (824, 826) have been studied in this way.

 Evaluation  -  Radio work can  be done with many species, but
 its  applicability  to toxicity testing is unknown because
 of the lack of control in  open fields.   The success at
 monitoring  body temperature  (813, 824)  suggests that heart
 rate and respiration could also be  monitored with radio
 equipment.   Equipment  for  large scale programs will be
 rather costly; single  transmitters  can cost $500 to $1000
 and  receivers, depending on  the size and capabilities,
 cost upwards  of $500.

 Observe/Monitor


This general category  includes the  simple observation of
exposed animals, for a dosage  -  mortality correlation,
"control" studies  in which a toxic  substance was tested for
its destructive ability on a given  species  or  larger group   I
of animals,  residue  analyses  (seperately  listed in  the  table5
for quick reference),  and  studies which report general
changes in  an animals  appearance or activity after
                             242

-------
exposure to drugs or other substances.   (For studies on
specific behavioral aspects see Behavioral Methods).

General population counts on invertebrates  (336), and soil
invertebrates in particular(1047,130,54), have been conducted
Earthworm  populations have been monitored in many studies of
toxic substances  (30, 34, 35, 37, 692).   Other terrestrial
species that have received attention are frogs  (721), snakes
(148), pheasants and Japanese quail  (293).,.  and monkeys
(831).  Most of these investigations have been performed
under lab conditions.

Reports of the general appearance of exposed creatures are
limited in number, but external lesions and other
morphological changes have been reported in frogs (139,
1120).

Of special note are the experiments in which brain wave
patterns have been routinely monitored by Iowa State
researchers by using surgically implanted electrodes  (628).
This procedure is used with primates as well, and could be
applied to many larger animals.  It may be more widely
used than we have been able to detect.

Evaluation - Observation of mortality rates and general
activity of the subject, as well as the palatability of test
substances, is an excellent method for screening potential
compounds.  Survival studies are essential for determining
the gross effects of exposure on animals.  However,  more
detailed biochemical tests, such as enzyme analysis, and
histopathological examination of subjects are required to
elucidate mechanisms of action and the direct causes of
mortality.  Behavioral testing is recommended for sublethal
poisoning.

Population Dynamics

Population dynamics is the study of numbers of organisms,
their reproductivity, growth, and survival.  It is  concerned
with the factors that control the abundance and the
distribution of a species.  The effects of toxic chemicals
on the reproductivity of animal population is thought by
many researchers to be a key point of concern in population
studies   (20).   There has been a large amount of work on
population dynamics (241).   Such research can conceivably
be performed with any species desired.  Aspects of  such
research include fertilization, embryo  viability,  egg
hatchability, growth rates, and overall survival.   Experiments
are designed around the life history and reproductive modes
of the test  animal.  For instance, birds are particularly
suited for embryological studies in which the egg yolk is
injected with the test substance, a route of exposure
difficult to employ on mammals.

                             243

-------
A basic protocol consists of dosing the test animal and then
scrutinizing parameters that may affect reproduction or
reproductivety itself.  There are acute studies in which
immediate mortality is a sure measure, and chronic studies
which are concerned with more subtle, long-term effects
due to single or repeated exposures.


While Population Dynamics is closely related to many other
methods (Observe/Monitor, Embryology, Oology) and uses many
procedures from other fields,it is distinguished here to
emphasize its importance.  Viable populations are ecological];
important for genetic, social and often economic reasons,
and though the test animals are individuals, it is the
integrity and viability of the entire gene pool that
determines the fate of a species.

Evaluation - Population studies can be performed on entire
populations, or on a few individuals from whom extrapolations
can be made.  The methods deal with effects on whole
organisms or populations and are not directly concerned with
individual effects or mechanisms.  Population studies are
recommended as screening methods to assess overall effects,
but must be followed by more exact tests if the goal is to
determine mechanisms and causes.

Chromatography

Chromatography is the set of methods used by chemists to
identify organic substances by color and by their positions
relative to each other on chromatographs.  Chromatography
is based on the theory that solutes, such as amino acids,
will tend to be distributed between two immiscible liquids
according to their relative solubility in each.  There
are many ways of creating this separation.  For example,
gas Chromatography vaporizes the mixture by heating it
and blows it over a column of material with a high melting
point.  The molecules of the mixture will partition
themselves between the gas and liquid according to their
relative solubilities in the two phases.

Chromatography can determine the presence of chemicals
tested for and a quantitative result can be obtained from
some types of procedures.  This method is very useful in
metabolism, residue, and degradation studies where data on
chemical presence and integrity are desired.  It is a
standard procedure in many biochemical laboratores, and
exact methods are available in most tests on lab methods.
                            244

-------
Evaluation  -  By  itself,  chromatography is not a very useful
technique for toxicological  testing but used as part of
larger  scale  testing,  such as metabolism studies
 (b91, 619) and residue  analyses  (~J11 220, 276) ^  is a
most useful tool.

Residues

Residue analysis is  simply the  determination of the concen-
tration of  toxic substances  in  a given place at a given  time.
It can  apply  to  soils, plants,  animals, or  atmosphere  -  any
part of the environment.  However, the analysis of animal
tissues is  of specific concern  here.

Animal  tissues are analyzed  for residues through  the use
of basic laboratory  techniques.  Extraction - clean up -
gas liquid  chromatography is an oft-used flow in  such  studies
 (29).   The results  can  give a  quantitative measure of the
test substance if conditions are right.  The significance
of the  residue or its  effects on the animal is another
problem and not  as easily determined.  Bioassay,  as used
in this report,  is similar to residue analysis, but is
concerned with the relative  strength of a substance and
its gross effect on  the  test organism.  Residue Analysis,
Observe/Monitor  (LD5Q) and Assay methods are interrelated.

Evaluation  -  Residues  in themselves do not  show any adverse
effects on  the animal.   They must be correlated with their
effects on  the subject species.

Bioassay

An assay is a chemical analysis to determine the  presence,
absence, or quantity of  one  or  more components of a substance.
In the  sense  it  is used  here it is practically synonymous
with residues, but is  concerned more with the relative
strength of a substance  in specific body tissues  and the
effect  of that substance on  the host tissue.  This is
usually achieved by  measuring the activity  of the substance
or related  enzyme. (910, 927).  Assay is used routinely
in drug research and methods applied in that field are
frequently  suitable  for  toxicological testing.

Evaluation  -  As  with the presence of residues, presence
of a toxic  chemical  does not give any indication  of its
effects on  the host  animal and  therefore is of use only  if
levels  can  be correlated with decreased survival, reproductive
success, behavioral  changes, etc.
                             245

-------
 Metabolism

Metabolism  research  is  concerned with  the  study  of the way
living  systems  handle substances^   It  is a very  broad
biochemical category that analyzes  the actual  breakdown,
storage,  re-use,  and clearance  of test substances  and  their
effects on  metobolic pathways,  including enzyme  inhibition
and  altered drug  metabolism (941, 947).

Radio-isotope labelling is  used in many metobolic  studies,
particularly those in which the toxic  substance  is an
organic compound  and specific pathways are  of  interest.
In this test the  products  resulting from the chemical
breakdown in the  system can be located and  analyzed.

Metabolism  studies are  closely related to  many categories
in this section.   (See Figure 23, The  Interrelationship
of Methodologies.)   In  these investigations, the chemical
fate of toxic substances  and their effects  on  the  life
processes of test organisms are the primary objectives and
they often  explain the gross effects readily visible by
general observation.  Metabolism studies are at  the bio-
chemical level and can be performed on all  animals.

Evaluation  - Metabolic studies are important in  toxicity
testing only if alterations at the biochemical level can
be correlated with a reduction in viability of the test
animals.  For instance, interference with  certain metabolic
pathways can reduce  the ability of animals  to  utilize  food
efficiently, defend  itself  against disease, etc.

Genetics

Genetics is a broad  subject which deals with,  among other
things, the transfer of information from one generation
to the  next.  Therefore, embryology, reproductivity,
mutagenicity, and resistance are related to heredity.  In
fact, because all characteristics of living systems are
more or less expressions of genetic material,  this category
should  be the largest.  However, we have generally limited
it to those studies  mentioned above.

The references under "Genetics" are primarily  concerned
with long-term reproductivity (822,  958) carcinogenic studies
(1031,  1081) and  resistance (see below).   Probably because
so little is known concerning specific genes in  most
animals, much of  the work of this nature is restricted to
Drosophila  (117,  119, 849).
                             24fi

-------
 Resistance  to  an  environmentally selective  factor like
 a pesticide has been  reported in insects  (12, 128,  854,
 855,  856,  857),frogs  (12,  154), and mice  (6,  9,  507,
 519),  and presents  a  particular problem in  the testing
 of  toxic chemicals  (see  Special Problems).

 The reproductivity  of species has received  a  rather large
 amount of  interest  because many environmental toxicologists
 believe it  to  be  one  of  the best ways to  study the overall
 effect of  toxic substances on animal life  (see Population
 Dynamics).   Some  of the  specific methods  involved in
 these  studies  are included above.

 Evaluation  - Mutagenic effects on animals as  a result of
 exposure are considered  undesirable, often  affecting its
 survival.   Genetic  studies are limited to a few  species
 at  present  (e.g.  Drosophila, mice, frogs) and may be
 difficult  to perform  on  other species less  genetically
 known.

 Anticholinesterases

 Acetylcholine  is  a  basic impulse transmitter  between
 nerve  cells outside the  central nervous system.  The
 enzyme which destroys the  transmitter is  a  cholinesterase.
 The action  of  many  organic insecticides is  in effect to
 create anticholinesterases which restrict the enzyme and
 may cause  muscular  fasciculations in the affected animal.
 Cholinesterase is also present in red blood cells, which
 are more easily monitored  than nerve endings.

 Purification of the insect cholinesterase for in vitro
 experiments is available  (860).  Anticholinesterases is
 separated  from enzymes because of the work  with  neurotoxic
 insecticides.

 Evaluation  - Anticholinesterases can be routinely tested
 on  all mammals and  birds.  A cross section  of animals should
 be  used because of  variations among species.  Though a
 very  specific  test, it is  valuable and can  show  direct
 effects on  animal survival.

Hepatic Studies

 The vertebrate liver  has received much attention in
 toxicological  testing because it serves as  a  "detoxification
 center" where  a variety  of injurious chemical compounds
 are converted  by  liver enzymes or where vital enzyme
 systems such as carbohydrate metabolism can be adversely
 affected by toxic substances.

                             247

-------
 Evaluation -  The liver is an excellent organ for the study
 of enzyme action and histopathology.

 Endocrinology

 Traditionally,  endocrinology has been the study of the
 ductless  glands and the physiological adjustments that
 their special products facilitate.   Because the glands
 themselves, and their products can  be affected by the
 introduction  of foreign substances  into the system,  they
 have received some attention- by pharmacologists who  have
 been involved in studying the effects of drugs (978).  Contro
 programs  of many types have used synthetic estrogens
 (e.cr.  diethylstilbestrol)  as possible control agents (477
 479, 1000),   and toxicologists have monitored endocrine
 levels and gland size to determine  the effects of toxic
 substances on rats (977).

 Lab methods are based on blood chemistry in which the
 amount of a specific endocrine is determined in order to
 compare the measurement to a standard.   Organ weights and
 size can  also be compared.

 The endocrine system is regulated by many factors, among
 which the autonomic nervous system  has the primary role.
 All types of  stresses-(drugs, tension, sickness) can affect
 the production  of endocrines.   Certain endocrine levels
 are also  affected by circadian rhythms,  such as breeding
 cycles, hibernation, etc.   These natural and "unnatural"
 variations must be considered in endocrinology work.

 Background endocrine information is available for many
 mammalian species (762,  923,  924).

 Evaluation -  The endocrine system is  very important  in
 all animals.  Breeding,  molting, hibernation, activity,
 are a few functions mediated by endocrines.   Any test which
 shows  alterations in levels of endocrines, especially those
 related to breeding (e.g.  FSH, estrogen,)  due to exposure
 to toxic  chemicals is of value.

Anatomy

 This category includes the general  anatomical and morphologic'
 work in which gross (e.g.  hyperplasia-hypoplasia)  or
 cellular  changes have been reported after exposure to a
 test substance.   The studies included here often overlap
 other  areas.  To avoid redundancy,  anatomy is restricted
 here to include only those papers dealing mainly with
 anatomical features and general subjects that can not be

                             248

-------
included under a different methodology.  Rodent muscular
efficiency  (982), necropsy  (585,  863,  984)  uterotrophy
 (983),  heart cells  (980), bone marrow (979) , and pulmonary
changes (754)  have all been studied in conjunction with
exposure to a wide range of toxic substances.   General
nervous system changes (981), and kidney lesions (915)
have been reported after exposure to toxic chemicals in
rats and rabbits.

Taxonomists have developed comparative methods of analysis
(e.g. morphometric,  118)  which could prove applicable
to the comparisons of exposed vs. control subjects in
toxicological testing.

Evaluation - General anatomical studies can show changes
due to exposure which are unimportant to a species:  for
example, hyperplasia-hypoplasia, or microscopic alterations
in tissue organization  (see Histology).  However, if survival
or longtime reproductivity are affected by the changes,
then anatomical studies can be valuable in determining
the effects of toxic chemicals..  General anatomical analysis
is part of post mortem work and should be included in that
phase of testing.

Physiology

Physiology is the study of function, whether it be on the
cellular or organ level, in any part of an animal's body.
This very broad category includes the toxicology of the
nervous system  (48,872,991,992,1011),  circulatory system
(920, 921, 1018), respiratory system  (685), muscles  (629),
auditory system  (1008, 1012), renal system  (587, 1084),
general studies  (70, 596, 1006), and many more.

The methods used are as varied as the subjects included
under Physiology and there are literally shelves of texts
and lab manuals available which deal with all  aspects of the
science. (The major reference is Handbook of Physiology
American Physiological Society 1959, 8 Vols.)

Evaluation - See specific methods for further information
and recommendations.

Histology

The study of tissues, their structure and organization,
is called histology.  It overlaps anatomy, physiology,
morphology and other fields, but is strictly defined as
the microscopic studies of tissue arrangements and form.  In
this report, histology includes most tissues studies,

                            249

-------
including carcinogenic work.  Methods employed are microscopy
as well as gross inspection of tissue reactions.   (Technical
help in tissue preparation may be necessary  for microscopy).

Dermal reactions to toxic substances can be  performed on
many animals(449,450,1070,1071,1102). The method is a simple
topical application and succeeding  analysis  of the exposed
tissue.   (A review of the method is given in reference
 671) .

Almost all animal tissues can be analyzed for the effects
of toxic substances if a route of exposure is available.
Inhalation studies of the respiratory tract  (775,  1080)
have been discussed under respiration.  I.V. and I.P.
injections and oral dosing can indirectly expose inner
organs (kidney, 446;  muscle,1101;; nervous tissue,  66;
liver, 387,  .  see Hepatic Studies).

Evaluation - Histology can be effectively used in the
analysis of effects of exposure to  toxic chemicals on all
animal tissues.  Comparisons of dosed animals to controls
or standards will give some indication of direct effects
on the anatomy of test animals.  An evaluation of what
these alterations mean in terms of  function, survival
etc. should then be made.  (Major reference:  Bloom, W.
and Fawcett, D.W. 1968 A Testbook of Histology, 9th ed.
Saunders)

Pathology

Pathology is the study of disease and the structural and
functional changes caused by disease.   Study" of "this sort
can utilize methods such as histology and physiology.
Disease can be used as a stress to test the  effects of a
substance on affected individuals.  Exposed  animals can
be treated with a pathogen  (195) .  Standard microbiological
methods can be obtained from a great number  of lab tests,
though  their applicability to toxicity testing is limited.
Most of the references under Pathology do not deal directly
with toxicological testing, but the information on diseases
has potential use in dealing with maintenance problems or
in selecting stressors.

Evaluation - The use of disease as a stress  is quite suitable
for toxicity testing.  It is a natural stress, one that must
frequently be confronted by a species in natural environments-
                             250

-------
 Pharmacology

Pharmacology is the science of drug action.  Many methods
used in this field are equally applicable to toxicology
because both deal with foreign substances that animals
must cope with.  Drug testing performed by the drug
manufacturer is expected to result in knowledge of the drugs
action as well as its safety for animal use.  Toxicological
testing must do the same.  Drugs can also be used as stressors
in toxicity testing or in studies of their synergistic
effects if there is a chance the two could be used together.

A review of methods for the use of primates in pharmacological
and toxicological tests is available (1110).

Evaluation - The use of drugs as stressors is recommended
only in cases where the animals would be exposed to the
drug, such as domestic species that may receive veterinary
care.

Hematology

Blood is the aqueous suspension of cells that is the
circulating fluid in most animals.  It is a very remarkable
body tissue that functions as a medium for the transport
of nutrients, as a regulator of metabolism, as nrotective
tissue, etc.  Its elaborate composition is too complex
to describe.  It differs from species to species,
often remarkably.

Blood is easily obtained from most animals without requiring
their death and techniques for bleeding mice  (1091) , swine
(615) ,   mink (1100)„• and other animals  (1072) are published.
Basic blood chemistry is known for most mammals and some
other vertebrates (611,  651, 663,  664,  1038,. 1088).

Total serum protein, urea nitrogen levels, glucose levels
and cholesterol levels have been a'ffected by food additives
in mice  (539).  Anticholinesterase changes are determined
from blood levels (608) .   Other parameters that can be
measured routinely are hematocrit, leucocyte levels, enzyme
levels, and hemoglobin activity.

Evaluation - Blood studies are efficient and valuable
because of the many meaningful measurements that can be
taken without sacrificing the test animal.  Though larger
species (e.g. nutria, sheep, galliformes, turtles, ducks)
are recommended, tests on smaller species are possible,
and insect hematology is fast accumulating background
information that can prove useful for comparison.

                             251

-------
 Oology

There  are two terrestrial animal groups that produce large
eggs which lend themselves to experimentation:   birds
and reptiles.  Their eggs are a unique vehicle  for
developmental and embryonic study.  In this report Oology
has been separated from Embryology to accentuate and more
suitably treat the toxicity studies, all avian, which are
concerned with eaa production (399,  405) , egg shell
characteristics  (392,  1063), egg viability and  hatchability.
 (194,400,1056,1067) , and ovulation lag  (736).   Actual
development of the embryo and unique responses  to chemical
exposures are treated in Embryology.

There  are basically two approaches that can be  taken in
Oology - Embryology research.  The adult organism
can be treated and reproductive/developmental success
monitored, or the embryo itself can be dosed.   The second
approach is simple in oviparous groups (See Embryology).
Parental exposure can be accomplished by a variety of
routes  (see introduction to Methodologies).  Correlations
between brain residue of female parents and egg production
have been reported  (396)  and ovulation lag in  Japanese
quail  is reviewed in reference (1107).

Eggshell thinning in larger birds, has been reported since
the early 1960's and been given much attention.  A good
review of that phenomenon can be found in reference 1D64.

Evaluation - Oological studies of toxic chemicals are very
important because of the direct effect on reproductivity
that can be estimated from the results.  It is  limited to
oviparous species at present.

Embryology

The study of developmental biology has utilized frogs'
aggs and birds'  eggs in a great many ingenious  fashions.
Researchers have studied pesticide distribution in exposed
embryos (1057) , teratogenic effects (226, 363, 641,  1073,1093),
fine structural changes (365),   and tissue residues (1062)
Plancental transfer of Cl4 labeled Parathion in sheep
 (1104)and eggshell thickness related to embryological
development (1063)  are other previous investigations.

Exposure of the embryo is accomplished in bird  studies by
injecting the yolk sac via the air sac (355,  356).   The
direct exposure,  quantification of dose, and quality
control make this method scientifically desirable.
                             252

-------
Some invertebrate eggs may be used in much the same way as
bird eggs to perform statistically valid experiments.
However, the route of exposure must be different from that
used with bird eggs due to the small size of the eggs.
Topical application (844,  1033),. and exposure of adults
 (114),  are possible routes.

Evaluation - Embryos and their development are directly
related to the survival and reproductive potential of
a species.  These studies are recommended for all potentially
exposed animal species.

Other

Under this heading are included techniques for handling and
testing animals, such as restraints (442, 604), drug
immobilization  (33, 655, 1098, 1106, 1107, 1108, 1109), and
hypnosis  (1074).  Special apparatuses for use in metabolic
cages (1096), for dusting insects  (1034), for feeding (656,
831), and for measuring activity  (1094, 1097) have been used
for experimental purposes.  More sophisticated devices
available include electroantennegrams for insects  (89),
body capacitor - olfactometers for small rodents  (1075,
1076), and a respiratory apparatus  (773)  (see Respiration).

Clean-up procedures are necessary for laboratory work
such as chromatography and the literature has much information
available for specific analytical methods (e.g.  1095).

This listing is a general one, because detailed
techniques and methods are quite varied, are often restricted
to specific types of analytical procedures, and may be valid
only for a given species.
                            253

-------
BEHAVIORAL METHODS


Introduction

The central premise upon which behavioral toxicology rests
is that an animal's reactions to enviornmental stimuli
(activity, habits, instinct, learning) can be affected by
alterations in its internal environment and that these
changes can be measured, thus directly indicating levels
of toxicity.  This branch of toxicology is important
because changes in behavioral patterns affect an animal's
interrelationships with its environment, thereby affecting
its ability .to perform tasks necessary for survival.  For
instance, a reduced reaction rate in avoidance responses
indicates a loss of awareness which would make the indivi-
dual less capable of escape from a predator.  Reduced
awareness and chance of survival go hand in hand in a
natural environment.  Behavioral testing is one method of
measuring subacute toxicity which can be directly related
to an animal's overall fitness.  A summary of references
available on various behavioral methodologies is found in
Table 26.

Repellents

In this discussion, a repellent means any chemical compound
that protects a potential food source; it can cause side
effects such as fright, convulsions, decreased productivity,
sterility and death.  Known concentrations of repellents
can be field sprayed in solid or liquid form to protect
plants from predators such as slugs  (1121) and deer  (1182).
Sprayed plots were noticeably more productive than control
plots.  Grain baits were used on rodents to measure
repellent effectiveness (508, 509, 1147) or prevent preg-
nancy (478).  Treated seed, either fed directly or grown
and then fed, has been used with numerous birds to determine
its potential for reducing pest reproductivity  (266).
Encapsulated rodent baits were fed to rats as sterilants
(1146) and to domestic farm animals to measure the dangers
of oral exposure  (1177).  A toxic, fright-producing chemical
was sprayed on plots in fields and kept blackbirds away
from the whole field (349).  With the exception of 349,
these repellents are not species-specific and could
probably be used on invertebrates and vertebrates alike.

Repellents can be used as a behavioral test, comparing the
reactions to those of dosed and control animals.
                             254

-------
LLJ

CO
3
o
                                                                 ,H \o r- co c*
                                                                  * (M Ol CM P4

 ID
 csi
  tu
  _i
  0
                                                                                                               o
                                                                                                               c
                                                                                                               01
                                                                                                               u
                                                                                                               o
                                                                                                                      •a
                                                                                                                       c
                                                                                                                       o
                                                                                                                       o
                                                    •o
                                                    c
                                                    «J
•o
c
a

to ta    o>
no    *>
«)~H    "
•o H    a
^irH    M
cu<    c
                                                                                            tn
                                                                                            •a
                                                                                                                o
                                                                                                                •a
                                                                                          O -P

                                                                                          o <
                                                                                          o
o
•o
3
rH
U

C
                                                                            255

-------
o  u

o  z

§  p
3:  z
t—  o
UJ  <-J
z:  --'
CD
C-J
                                                                                                    a
                                                                                                    o
                                                                                                    e
                                                                                                    id
                                                                                                   •a
                                                                                                   •H
                                                                                                    o
                                                                                                   T)
                                                                                                    c
                                                                 o
                                                                 x
                                                                 u
                                                                                              u
                                                                                              o
                                                                                              c
                                                                                              o

                                                                                              u

                                                                                              o

                                                                                              Q,



                                                                                              "8
                                                                                              O


                                                                                              n
                                                                                              ci

                                                                                              1
                                                                                              i-H
                                                                                              U
                                                                                              c
I
to
0)
u

•8
§
•a
c
o
u
                                                                  256

-------
 --  O
>-  UJ
cr:  =

3  2

o  t-
C3  Z
CD  O
3:  «_>
                                                                                                             •o
                                                                                                             c
                                                                                                             id
                                                                                                             c
                                                                                                             o
                                                                                                             a
                                                                                                             •o
                                                                                                              
-------
                                                                                          TT CO

                                                                                          °Ł> i-i

                                                                                          CM f-H
re  o
H- t-J
CM

 LU
                                                                                                 in  in
                                                                                                 en  co
                                                                                                 CM  CM

•d
c c
ts o

3 0
o u
a.
01
o
o
•o
c
to

01
c
o
3

l-t
1

V4
a)
S
01
01 r-l
U O
d) 14
JJ 4J
18 (U


CTI
a c
,6 id
in

TJ
C
Id
0)
C 01
0-H
0) H
33
01
rH
•H
SO
4J
O
- o
01 U
o
c-a
id c
u


0
o
u
•B
1
erns
•o
c
a

01
rH
U

01
u
U 01

C C
tH -H

U U
r4 ^
V O
cu t,
                                                                    258

-------
                                                                                   •-(     O tH rH *-t

                                                                                   iH     !-!»*•»

                                                                                     »fo   *-'^r VD co o
                                                                                   r-« in  o in in in \o

                                                                                   f-i r-l  '-  O
cs  uj

3  I
o  —
C3  H
o  z
3=  O
I— <_>
I i  t *^s
                               ssaa^s  5
s
U)
•g
(3
(Q
O
rH



a
o
o

•a
g
a
4J g)
M O
.a fl
HI B
01
c
OJ
4J
Deser


m
4->
s
•a
t-i
-i
0
VI
VI
3
tr
in
•a
Groun
a ta
Ci C
si
11
in u
01 TJ
2§
H
r-H
"*
•O
g
to
o
r-*
O
•a
c
10
o
o
E
V4
01
&


'SI
a
iH
r-i




0}
0 4J
U 10
-rl «
Ł
A
«
c
                                                                      259

-------
                                                                             *O* IS VD
                                                                           r- o t-t r-
                                                                           W O O r-l
                                                                           in t-t rH r-t
U-l
CQ
>-  o
L3  HJ
CD  =
_1  Z
O  —
O  I-
CD  Z
to
CNl
   m      in
   0      o

   O      O


II O    0) C

^t o    Mm

J ~    J
   o    o  o
   ^   -H  ^
   •H.   JJ 'H
rn c    a  d
•-I V4    0)  H
   §4    S  «J
   o    o u
en      a
                                                                                         •a
                                                                                         c
                                                                                         id
                                                                                         14

                                                                                         s
•a
c
id

a
o
o
s:
u>
•d
c
id
o

S
                                                                       260

-------
cr:
O
>-  a
tr  LJ
3  i
o  —
3:  o
I— <->
                     sauouiojatjj
                          ssaxis
 UJ
 _J
 CO
                                                                                •o
                                                                                •H
                                                                                o

                                                                                a
                                                                                 a

                                                                                 
-------
Evaluation - The use of repellents  to measure behavioral
reactions altered by a second chemical is quite  feasible for
all species.  They can also be used to test  avoidance  re-
action to evaluate the sensitivity  of a  test species to a
hazard.

Discrimination

Discrimination  is the ability to distinguish one thing from
another by means of one or more of  the five  senses.  Most
laboratory studies have dealt with  visual and olfactory
cues.

Olfactory tests done with rodents have demonstrated the
importance of odor in food detection and palatability
(1150, 1151).

Newts can discriminate visually between  dosed tadpoles and
controls, attacking the dosed animals far more frequently
(1133).  This type of test could be done with any predatory
animal that hunts by sight.
                                i
Bobwhite quail have been trained in a Skinner box, fed a
toxic substance for a few weeks, and then retested.  Their
performance was much lower in the retests  (280).  This type
of testing could be done on all .animals.

Pigeons  (270) and opossums  (1186)'have been  tested for
visual acuity but this type of test could be done on any
vertebrate species and could readily be  adapted  to toxicity
testing.  For a diagram of the apparatus used see Figure 24.

Behavioral tests of depth perception have been done using
a visual cliff, with young cornish  hen chicks  (1139) and
first generation offspring of pheasants  fed  a toxic sub-
stance (734).  Movements of the young chicks when placed
in the middle of the visual cliff were recorded.  In both
cases, movements were considered partially a produce of
the chick's previous environmentt but the offspring of the
dosed parents differed significantly in  performances from
the controls.  For a diagram of the apparatus used in  these
tests, see Figure 25.

Primates have been tested for visual discrimination and
were rewarded when they made a correct choice  (630).   For
an idea of the chamber used, see Figures 26  and  27..

A general discussion of chemoreception in gastropods may
also be classified under the category of discrimination
(1122).

                             262

-------
KEV
                 PHOTOCELL
                   BEAMS
       Figure 24.  Diagram of visual acuity chamber

A partition divides the chamber into two alleys, entrances
to which are marked by hurdles mounted two inches above the
floor.  Photocells, illuminated by a white 28V. 0.1-ampere
lamp, record entrances into the alleys.  The plastic observ-
ing key and the glass stimulus keys are one inch (2.5 cm)
in diameter and mounted approximately 10 inches (25 cm)
above the floor.
Source:  (270) Copyright 1971 by the Society for the
         Experimental Analysis of Behavior, Inc.
                            263

-------
             -It-
I-..-—I
        Fiqrure 25.  Cutaway of a visual cliff
                    used as a test apparatus.
Source:  (1139) Copyright 1964 by the  American  Psychological
        Association.   Reprinted by permission.
                           264

-------




                            -


  Figure  26.   Discriminatory device used in primate
               testing
Figure 27.  Inside of visual discrimination cham-
            ber for primate testing
Source:  (630)
                          265

-------
Evaluation  - Discrimination tests,  comparing control and
dosed  organisms, may  be  directly extrapolated to species
in natural  environments.   The  "less aware"  individual,  for
example,  is more susceptible to  predation and other envir-
onmental  hazards.

Stress

Included  under  the  general category of stress are such
things as infections,  intoxicants,  trauma,  nervous strain,
heat,  cold, muscular  fatigue and irradiations.   In most
stress studies, a toxic  substance is fed, the animals are
subjected to an additional stress,  and then survial rate
 (348,  394,  742, 743,  1178), reproductive rate (112, 348)
and tissue  levels of  the substance  (374, 743, 768) were
studied..  Painful or  emotional stimuli have been used to
study  renal response  in  large  mammals (823).   Isolation
stress has  been studied  in lab mice (770).   Temperature
gradients have been used to study growth in snails (694).
Mallards  have been  fed toxic substances and then exposed to
a virus (195).  They  were less resistant than the control
birds.  Rats have been drugged and  exposed to cold and
other  stresses.  Drug action and metabolism were affected
 (767)  and drug  tolerance levels  were lowered (766).

Hibernation has been  tested as a .stress factor.   General
field  studies have  been  done on  skunks (1140, 1175), and
lab observations on using the  bat and hedgehog (1141).   It
has been  found  that hibernation  effects oxygen consumption
and temperature regulation in  ground squirrels (1149) and
hamsters  (1187).  The transition periods at the beginning
and end of  hibernation have been studied in pocket mice
 (457),  ground squirrels  and hamsters (482).

^valuation  - Animals  are stressed in their natural environ-
ments  by  many factors, for example, disease,  temperature,
food shortages, etc.   (See Physical/Chemical Methods -
Stress) and their adaptations  for coping with seasonal  and
daily  stresses are  of physiological importance.   A test
which  can compare the reactions  of  control and dosed organ-
isms to stress situations might  be  extrapolated to quantify
the effect  of toxic substances on the reactions of wild
population.  For instance, hibernation occurs in many
mammals (e.g. daily torpor in  shrews)  and,  a few birds,  and
diapause  occurs in  insects.  These  natural  occurrahces  are
necessary for the survival of  many  species  and alternations
in this behavior will  affect the viability  of the organism
during a  period of  stress.   Isolation,  disease,  and fatigue
are stresses directly applicable to natural situations  and
                             266

-------
are suggested parameters for testing a species reaction to
stress after exposure to toxic chemicals.

Pheromones

Pheromones are chemical compounds produced by animals to
attract mates and communicate sexual receptiveness.  They
are reported to occur in many groups of animals, but are
best known in insects.  Since their discovery, they have
been used as a means of controlling and eliminating insect
pest species.  Methods of extraction, purification, and use
as masks for attractants have been studied in the cockroach
(1125) and many Lepidopterans (91, 1130).  A general
discussion of the physical structure, commercial use, and
technology of pheromones is given in reference 1129.  The
chemical basis of insect sociality (1128) and the use of
moths (1126) have been studied.   The Red-Banded leaf roller
has been used to determine the structural features necessary
for a compound to elicit synergistic or inhibitory activity
(1127).   The purification and evaluation of synthetic
attractants for insects has also been studied (1131).  Snail
trails as cueing devices have also been studied (1123).

Pheromones might be used in mammalian studies, as mammals
are known to use olfactory cueing.

Evaluation - Pheromones are effective means of insect
control, can be combined with toxic chemicals (1129) and
could be used as a method of collection of insects for lab
use.  It is possible to use pheromones in behavioral testing
in which the reactions of dosed animals and control animals
to pheromones is compared.

Neurophysiology

Neurophysiological studies encompass taste reception and
auditory studies, drugs, induced convulsions, EEG's and
EMG's.

Taste reception studies range from analysis of the potentially
important consequences of taste reception (599)  to mammalian
species differences in taste sensitivity  (1143, 1144), the
electroneural response spectrums of taste fibers in the
domestic cat (1011), electrophysiological studies in the
ungulate (589, 1178), dog  (1176), bat and opossum  (437), and
electrophysiological studies of synergistic effects of taste
reception in the dog  (1009).
                             267

-------
The auditory responses of sheep have been measured before
and after dosing with a toxic substance  (627).  Cats have
been given toxic substances in an effort to inhibit cochlea
potential response  (1012) and dogs have been  used in
similar studies  (1007).

Mice have been raised on different types of bedding and
then administered a convulsion producing drug. • It was
found that drug thresholds correlated with the type of
bedding used  (527).

Sheep have been given toxic substances orally followed by
EEC's.  Gross behavioral observations were also made  (628).

Although mammals have been the principal subjects used in
neurophysiological studies, birds, herptiles, and some of
the larger invertebrates could be used.  The  limiting
factor for invertebrates is the lack of appropriate
electrophysiological equipment.

Evaluation - EEC and other electrophysica.1 methods are
excellent techniques for recognizing changes  due to
exposure to toxic substances.  However, data  on mortality,
impaired functioning, and altered reproduction potentials
or behavior are necessary before altered electrical
responses can be correlated with harm or potential
detriment to the test species.

Other
This category includes general behavior, sleep, circadian
rhythms, and photoperiodism as parameters that can be
important for toxicity testing.

Mites have been exposed to a toxic substance to observe its
effects on their dispersal and oviposition rates  (55).  The
aggregating behavior of Natrix  (water snake)  (1132) might
be used in toxicity testing.Metabolism, food capacity
and feeding differences between species have been studied
in shrews (904).  Social  (511, 1152) and sexual  (1153)
behavior have been studied in the genus Peromyscus.  A
method of recording burrowing activity  (see Figure28  ) has
been devised and used on the mountain beaver  (1097).

A means has been worked out for quantifying general ac-
tivity in mice  (1094).
                            268

-------
                     : 5 Digit Counter
                     :24V
                   Mountain Beaver Tunnel
           "250/50 V
                                         27K
                                        -vww-
                                                     30V
                                     Brass Tuba


                                     6/oss Capillary Tubs Insulator



                                     Flexible Wire
                                     Brass Probe serves
                                     as contact switch. The
                                     flexible feelsr win is bent
                                     by passing animal to
                                     compete the circuit.
            Figure  28.
Wiring diaaram of  traffic counter.
Mountain  beaver burrow with picto'rial
drawing of burrow  probe in  place.
(1097)
                                     269

-------
Various methods of dosing Coturnix with toxic substances
have been used to determine  (a) the effects on sleeping
time and  (b) if the route of exposure made any difference
in sleeping time  (384, 398, 403) .

Mallard and black ducks, though closely related species,
have been shown to have striking differences in their
responses to different photoperiods  (194).  Differences due
to circadian rhythms have been demonstrated in drug-induced
mortality (1159) and heart rate (1158) in mice and rats.
The effects of photoperiodism on reproductive cycles have
been studied in birds  (254).

Most of these methods did not deal directly with toxicity
testing.  However, they point out various aspects of
animal behavior that should be taken into account when an
animal is used in such testing.  Even though these .methods
were used on a limited number of species, there seems to be
no reason why they could not be applied to all vertebrate
species and some invertebrates.

Evaluation -  The general behavior of most species can be
monitored and specific alterations caused by toxic substances
can be measured.  The results may be extrapolated to wild
populations to evaluate the effect of the toxic substances
on their viability.

Instinct

Instinct is defined as behavior that is innate, not learned.
Because of its universality and its uniformity within a
species, instinct can be a useful parameter in measuring the
effects of toxic substances.

The reaction of Gallinaceous chicks to frightening stimuli
has been measured in terms of the distance and duration of
the chicks'  movement away from the stimuli (1135).  For
pictures of the apparatus used, see Figure 29.  Another
test of Gallinaceous chicks exposed the chicks to a tape
recording of a hen's call and measuring their speed of
response  (1135).  For pictures of this apparatus, see
Figure 30.

Spiders have also been used in studies of instinct.  Their
webs were photographed, measured and compared by computer
to controls. /For pictures of the examination table used,
see Figure 31.   For pictures of the photographic setup
used, see Figure  32.  A general discussion of methods of
preparing webs for photography and of calculating the
                            270

-------
 igure 29 (a) .   Runways
 ith frightening device
 t one end.
                                           Figure  29(b).   Runway mech-
                                           anism for  operating frighten-
                                           ing device.
-gure  29(c).   Runways,
:ightening device,  and
<*mera  used to record
Uck's response.
        (1135)
                                     271

-------
 Figure 30(a).   Enclosure for 10 runways.
Figure 30(b).  Runway with speaker at far end,




Source:  (1135)          272

-------
Figure 30 (c).  Holding area - point of release
 Source:   (1135)
                         273

-------
Figure 31(a).  Examination table prior to
               photographing web.
Figure 31(b).   Examination table prior to
               photographing web.
Source:  (53)
274

-------
                                          •

Figure  32.  Apparatus for photographing web,
Source:  (53)
                        275

-------
changes in structure of the webs is found in 1124.  A
discussion of the variables that affect web building and
web building's applicability to pharmacological testing is
also included.  Reference 53 describes a study of  spiders
exposed to drugs and allowed to spin webs.

Evaluation - Innate behavior is uniform in a species and
universal in the animal kingdom.   It can be used to test an
animal's viability when exposed to toxic substances.  For
example, behavior related directly to mating  (e.g., court-
ship displays in grouse, ducks) could be monitored (perhaps
in cage field enclosures).  Instinctual behavior related to
nesting  (all birds), migration  (ducks), territoriality
 (Dipodomys), maternal  care of young  (birds and mammals), and
breeding (all species) could also  serve as parameters.

Learning

In the laboratory, learning is studied by teaching tasks or
skills to a subject, then testing  its ability to accomplish
them.  Data are available on learning for many species and
experiments concerned with the effects of toxic substances
on learning are easily carried out.

The effects of various drugs on mice have been studied via
the learned skill of walking a revolving rod  (1173).  Rats
have been tested in a Skinner box, drugged, then retested
(547, 1165, 1171).

Rats and mice have been trained and then tested to determine
their reaction to increasing amounts of toxic vapor  (1168).
Rats have also been drugged, taught and then retaught with-
out drugs and their performances compared  (1164).  Rats have
been injected with an  endotoxin and a dose-dependent
decrease in activity noted (1163).  Pavlovian procedures
have been used to produce aggression in rats as a  response
to a tone stimulus  (1162).  Gerbils have been taught dis-
criminated avoidance response to a Skinner box  (1166).
Opossums have been taught to solve the Guthrie-Horton puzzle
box (1189).  They were also taught to give an avoidance
response (1190).  For an automated method for studying
aggression in primates (1185) see  Figure ."33.  Primates were
also trained, given toxic substances, and impaired operant
behavior was noted in all cases (104, 547, 1184).  Sheep
were trained, then electrodes were surgically implanted in
their skulls and they were orally  dosed with a capsule of
toxic material daily.  Their general behavior and  results
of post-operation tests were evaluated (1179).  Coturnix
chicks were fed toxic substances and changes in their
                            276

-------
      Fiqure 33.  An automated method for studying aggression
                  in primates.
                                                               r
                                                                _ MOH
                                                                ium»t
                                                    to* view
                                         b.  Bite  Sensor Assembly
   a.  Bite  Sensor and Hinged Neck  Yoke
           MONt VltW
                       The biting  sensor  is
                       a piece of  pure gum rubber,
                       general purpose pressure-vacuum
                       laboratory  hose  (E. H. Sargent
                       and Co., Catalogue No. S-73515,
                       size F).  Its outer diameter  is
                       5/8 in. and the wall thickness
                       is 1/8 in.  The ends of the hose
                       were forced over 1/2 in. diameter
                       brass nipples, which were soldered
                       at right angles to the 1/4 in.
                       brass hose  supports.  These hose
                       supports were long enough to  allow
                       the hose assembly  to be moved
                       toward or away from the monkey's
                       face.  One  of the  support arms
                       was drilled out to permit trans-
                       mission of  pressure changes to
                       the biting  transducer.
  c. Biting  Transducer  Assembly
Source:  1185
                277

Copyright 1966 bv the Society for the Experimental
Analysis of Behavior, Inc.

-------
avoidance responses were noticed  (380) .  The effects of
drugs on mixed reinforcement tests were studied  in pigeons
and it was found that endogenous  stimuli were affected  (264).
The effects of an amnesia producing drug on repeated
reversals of discriminatory testing were also studied in the
pigeon  (1134).  A general study of conditioned and uncondi-
tioned aggression without the use of toxic substances was
also undertaken with the pigeon  (269).  A general study of
factors that influence learning has been done with land
snails  (42).

Evaluation - Learning involves the acquisition of a task or
skill or other capability on the  part  of the subject.  The
ability to respond or to perform  the task can be hindered by
exposure to toxic chemicals and the degree of confusion or
change.  Also, the ability to learn new tasks can be tested
on dosed subjects and controls and the effects of exposure
on the learning process can be evaluated.

This type of testing can reveal an animal's ability to cope
in its natural environment and can conceivably be performed
on any animal that can learn.
                            278

-------
SUGGESTED METHODOLOGIES


Introduction

Scientific experimentation is designed to produce results
that prove or disprove a hypothesis.  The general hypothesis
in toxicity testing is very often that the test chemical is
adversely affecting an animal or animal species.   Conse-
quently, the methods used must distinguish toxic effects.

After years of study, many environmental toxicologists have
concluded that any change caused by a chemical that alters,
injurs, reduces, or otherwise affects the immediate or long
term reproductivity of a species is a significant toxic
effect; reproductive fitness is the major factor determining
the success of a species (20, 822).  The parameters used to
determine the effect of toxic substances on reproductivity
can include decreased reproductive life span, sterility,
reduced litter/clutch size, early mortality, behavioral
changes affecting intra and interspecific communication and
so on.

A distinction must be made between toxic effects which can
be correlated with decreased reproductivity and those which
are not or cannot.  For example, residue analyses and bio-
assays are useless .unless they can be correlated with acute
toxicity, chronic toxicity or decreased reproductivity.
LDso's often do not reflect environmental conditions because
concentrations of the test chemical do not match those
found in nature nor do the routes of exposure used fit the
exposure routes found in natural environments.

Suggested Approaches to Toxicity Testing

The methods selected in this report yield effects that are
directly or indirectly related to the reproductive fitness
of a species.  The list does not include all possible test
methods, but was assembled using the information found in
the literature and the recommendations of environmental
toxicologists.

A list of selected toxicity testing methods is presented in
Table 27.  (See evaluations of each method in previous
section for further discussion.)  To obtain comprehensive
results, most methods should be used with both adults and
juveniles.  Some methods, however, are suited for embryos;
this is specified under the heading "Routes of Exposure."
Routes of exposure were selected to best reflect those that
                            279

-------










o
2;
H
EH
CŁ
W

EH
H
CJ
H
X
o
EH

O
EH

en
W
ffi
U
O
c*J
CM
CU
*3<

Q
W
EH
CJ
W
1-3
w
en
€
r-
CN
CU
rH
&
(0
EH
















0
•H
X CU
O en
EH C
O
tw CX
O en
cu
rH K
cu

3
O CU
K >-i
•O en
CD O
4J p.
en X
cu w
tP

3 O
en


in
cu
-H
0
cu
o.
rA
WJ
TS
CD
4J
en
a)
Cr
3
en








4J
en
cu
EH

rrj
CU T3
4J 0
en .c
CU 4->
tr cu
3
en





U

















}_i
O
cu
fd
Ł>








en
cu
0
cu
cu
en

r-H
W






4->
rH >-l
fd O
O CU
•H en
E i C
cu id

U 0 EH
\ -«H
rH 4-) H
fd fl3 <0
O H-H
•H -rH rH
en CU-H
>i en CJ
.C CU
CU OS



m
«.
rij











,_,
id
o
•H
CU
o
4J
1
rH
fd
j_i
O








en
CU
U
cu
cu
in

rH
fd



i

en
O
•H }H
E 0
fd 4J
C-H
J>i Ł
Q 0
2

O CU
•H >
4-) i-l
« o
r-n en
3.Q
CUO
O






Q







^^
in
0
j^
•|
cu
en
CU <-3
4J
3 eo
O 4J

j3
rH rQ
rH (0
fd *-*




0)
O
•H en
E C
- CU

f"*n t^-
•H >H
x: a.
a
O fd
to C
ss
Q

















O
•H
4->
CU
c
cu
0





o


















rH
fd

o








en
cu
0
cu
cu
en

rH
m





en
cu
tn
fd
M
CU
4-1
en
cu
C
•H
rH
O
A
O
-H
4->
C






Q











rH
fd
o
-H
O
-p
1
rH
m
SH
O








en
eu
0
0)
cu
en

rH
fd












i en
cu
Ł 6
en >i
•rH N
rH C
O W
A
m
cu
Ł



Q

CJ











rH
fd
O
•rH
CU
O
4->
1
rH
fd

o








en
cu
o
cu
cu
en

rH
td











^i
CT*
O
rH
O
C
•H
J_l
U
O
C
W



Q

U CJ











rH
fd 4J
CJ 0
•H CU
CU -n
0 C
4J -H
1 1
rH rH
fd td
tl Jl
0 0








en en
eu Q)
o u
cu cu
cu cu
en en

rH rH
fd fd














Ł»,
er>
o
>1 rH
E 0
O 4->
4-) td
m E
c o
< ffi



Q
*.
CJ













in
Q)
4->
O


rH
rH
fd








M
0
o
cu
cu
in

rH
td















^,
tT1
o
rH
O
4J
•rH
K

CJ

«"

ffi







^_^
m
O
JH

rH Q)
fd
VH <^J
O
i en
4J 4J
O r-H
CU 3

e?JB









en
cu
3 O
O cu E
rH CU 3
fd en en
CU en
•H 0
> CU
O 0












1

t^l *•
tr> fd
O >i M
rH er> O
O O -H
>irH >
JH O fd
.a o 4;
E CU
W W



CQ CQ (3

rtj ril  fd 4-1 (d 4J
1 > 1 > 1
rH rH H
id id (3
ii < i ti
O O 0



^^
tn
en cu
eu cu
•rt ifl
eo o - en
CU CU Q) Q) Q)
4-) "H CU O 'fH
id O en -H o
SH CU 6 &
,Q CU rH CU
eu en id • tn
4J -H Cn
H o -H
/it ^\ /j% i
\y W w r^
> en *-* (0










C 
-------







o
55
H
EH
CO
W
EH
EH
U
H

O
EH

0
EH
CO
W
ffi

-------
    A  / Mortality
  B
Morbidity
C  /  Functional Change
     Biochemical Change


      Threshold Level
          (residue)
                     Organis
                                Tissue
                    Molecule
                     Structur(
               FIGURE 14
   Succession of Toxic Response
                282

-------
may occur naturally.  Figure 34.   Succession of Toxic
Responses, is keyed to Table 27 to show which methods are
best suited for investigating toxic effects at each level
of response.

General Studies

Long term generation studies can use aspects of all selected
methods, and can be conducted on any species that is readily
bred under laboratory conditions (See final list in Sugges-
ted Species).  When short generation times are desired, in-
sects  (Drosophila, Musca),  mice (Mus, Peromyscus),  voles
(Microtus), rice rats (Oryzomys),  and Japanese quail are
recommended.  Generation studies are important for toxicity
testing because their results are directly applicable to
the long term reproductivity of animals.  The costs and time
involved are considerable,  but the results are well worth
the effort.  Previous experimental work can be used as a
guide to further study (see reference 822).

The Selection of Methods for Toxicity Testing

There are two important decisions to make in testing of
toxic chemicals:   (a) choosing the test that will tell the
most about the specific chemical substance; and  (b) choosing
the animals that will be used for subjects.  These decisions
are frequently interrelated.

Selection of test method should be made in light of previous
work with chemicals of the same class as the test substance.
The test selected should give preliminary information.  For
example, chemical A is a member of a class of compounds
which are known or suspected of being neurotoxic, but the
biochemical mechanism is unknown.   These chemicals are also
contaminants of forested lands and are taken into plants in
large quantities.  Initial testing should then utilize
herbivores of forest inhabitats and, because chemical A may
be neurotoxic, behavioral tests applicable to these species
should be used in conjunction with neurophysiological-
biochemical lab work to determine the mechanism of action.

Certain approaches to toxicity testing require basic know-
ledge about the test animal and its special characteristics
(see Table 27).  For example, mutagenicity testing can most
easily be done on genetically well-known animals (e.g.
Drosophila) while dosing embryos in teratogenic experiments
is best accomplished with easily accessible embryos  (e.g.
those of oviparous species).  On the other hand, if a route
of exposure is available, most tests can be performed on any
species.

                             283

-------
 A description  of  the  levels  of  toxicity  testing is  provided
 in Figure 34.   The  organism  as  a whole and  survival are  of
 primary  importance  while  morbidity research,  functional
 studies, biochemical  analyses and  residue determinations
 are sublevels  of  interest.   The survival of each individual
 is dependent on what  occurs  at  each lower level and testing
 at each  one  is a  way  of obtaining  information about the
 whole  organism.   All  information which can  be related  to
 the survival of individuals  can be a means  of assessing  what
 will happen  at the  population level.

 The level  selected  for testing  should be chosen on  the basis
 of known information  about the  chemical  and the suitable
 species.

 State-of-the-Art

Feelings are mixed throughout the scientific world about the
state-of-the-art of toxicity testing.  Some experts in en-
vironmental  toxicology feel that the field is on a par,
scientifically and technically, with most of  the biologically
related disciplines.  On the other side,  there are scientists
who feel that present efforts fall short of sufficiency and
that more areas of testing should be introduced to the field.
They cite the lack of background residue data with which
most testing is done as one example of inadequate testing.
They advocate the routine inclusion in preliminary work of
total in - total out, total residue and clearance work and
100 percent of the dose accounted  for after exposure.
Other suggestions and criticisms follow.   They  summarize
the general  feelings we have encountered in the  literature
and from contact with scientists.

 1.  testing  juveniles as  well as adults  (all  age classes)

 2.  more tests required on species actually affected by  the
    test chemical in  natural situations, not  just lab  ani-
    mals

 3.  increase federal  funds for  environmental  toxicology  re-
    search and education  programs

 4.  more long  term  generation,  chronic,  and subacute,
    studies  for wild  species

 5.  poor knowledge  of test animals'  background (i.e. pos-
    sible  previous  exposure) before testing

 6.  most tests performed  in  the past were not sensitive  to
                             284

-------
    the effects of test chemicals on the animal (e.g. LD5Q/
    residue) and prove little more than exposure

7.  failure of test methods, especially routes of exposure,
    to coincide with actual concentrations and rates en-
    countered in nature

The Future

At the present time there is research taking place in an
attempt to develop a computerized methods of quantitatively
analyzing the biochemical structure of drugs and predicting
from that structure, the mechanism of their action, without
microscopic knowledge of complex processes occurring in vivo.
This is theoretically possible because all compounds have a
chemical structure which determines their physical activity
or reactions with other compounds.  If The Hansch Approach,
as this is called, ever becomes a usable system, it could
concievably be adapted for use with whatever class of chem-
icals one desires, including toxic chemicals.  However,
the difficulties in the development and operation of such a
system are immense and much further research is necessary
before the Hansch approach can be applied.

Another approach to testing which appears to have greater
feasibility is the use of model ecosystems for toxicity
testing.  The EPA labs in Corvallis, Oregon, are putting
forth a major effort to build systems that can be readily
set up for widespread use.  These systems are being de-
signed for specific problems or for areas where certain
chemicals are applied (e.g. agricultural systems and pesti-
cides) .  The problems associated with model ecosystems and
toxicity testing are presented in the Special Problems Sec-
tion of this report.

Many environmental toxicologists feel that the future of
toxicity testing should include a greater standardization
of testing methods/procedures and a greater emphasis on the
effects of chemicals on natural animal populations.  LE^Q
and residue studies are of preliminary importance, but the
subacute physical, chemical and behavioral effects of real-
istic doses administered under conditions found in the en-
vironment on animals that are actually affected are now in
order and have been initiated in various institutions a-
round the country and the world.  We must learn the sub-
lethal effects of chemicals in order to determine the over-
all hazard they present and to quantitatively and realis-
tically predict the level of toxicity of any chemical that
is applied to our environment.
                            285

-------
       APPENDIX A




CONTACTS AND CONSULTANTS

-------
                  CONTACTS AND CONSULTANTS
James Akerman
Richard Aulerich
Mr. Woodrow Benson
Joel Bitman
Woodrow Benson
William Buck
Ron Borchard
EXPERTISE

Wildlife
Biologist
Mustelid
Toxicology
Pesticide
Monitoring
Avian
Toxicology
Pharmacology
Behavioral
Toxicology
Psychologist-
Herpetologist
ADDRESS

KPA
Ecological Effects
 Branch
Washington, D.C.

Department of Poultry
 Science
Michigan State Uni-
 versity
East Lansing, MI

Director
Idaho Community
 Pesticide Project
State House
Boise, Idaho  83720

Agricultural Research
 Station
USDA
Beltsville, MD

Professor
Department of Physi-
 ology
College of Veterinary
 Medicine
Washington State Uni-
 versity
Pullman, Washington

Director
Behavioral Toxicology
 Laboratory
Veterinary Medicine
 School
Iowa  State University
Ames,  Iowa   50010

University of
 Tennessee
Knoxville, TN

-------
                  CONTACTS AND CONSULTANTS
                         (continued)
James Cannelli
Charles Cargille
Helene C. Cecil
Richard Crawford
Cirpriano Cueto
Armondo de la Cruz
William Diechman
Richard Dorn
EXPERTISE

Avian
Toxicology
Model
Ecosystems
Avian
Toxicology
Pathology/
Epidemiology
Toxicologist
Effect of
Pesticides
on isopods &
grasshoppers
Beagle
Toxicology
Veterinarian
Toxicology/
Epidemiology
ADDRESS

Massachusetts Coop
 Wildlife Research
 Unit
Amherst, MA

NICH
NIH
Bethesda, MD

Agricultural Research
 Station
USDA
Beltsville, MD

Professor
Diagnostic Pathology
College of Veterinary
 Medicine
Washington State Uni-
 versity
Pullman, WA

National Center of
 Toxicology Research
Pine Bluff, AR

Professor
Department of Zoology
Mississippi State
 University
State College, MS
39762

University of Miami
 Medical School
Coral Gables, FL

Professor
Department of Veteri-
 nary Micro
Veterinary Medicine
 School
University of
 Missouri
Columbia, MO

-------
                  CONTACTS AND CONSULTANTS
                        (continued)
Virqil Freed
Milton Frifind
A. R. Gaufin
Jerry B. Graves
D. Gerberq
Yvonne Greichus
Max A. Haegele
R. L. Harris
EXPERTISE

Environmental
Toxicologist
Avian
Toxicology
Limnology
Avian
Toxicology
Insect
Toxicology
Biochemistry/
Wildlife
Toxicology
Avian
Toxicology
Veterinary
Toxicology/
Pesticides
ADDRESS

Environmental Health
 Science Center
Oregon State Univer-
 sity
Corvalis, OR 97331

Denver Wildlife
 Research Center
Federal Center
Denver, CO

Professor
Department of Zoology
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, UT

Louisiana State Uni-
 versity
Baton Rouge, LA

Insect Control and
 Research
Baltimore, MD

Experimental Station
South Dakota Univer-
 sity
Brookings, SD 57006

Denver Wildlife
 Research Center
Federal Center
Denver, CO

Research Leader
Veterinary Toxicology
 and Entomology
 Laboratory
USDA
P. 0.  Box GE
College Station, TX
77840

-------
                  CONTACTS AND CONSULTANTS
                        (continued)
Dale Hattis
Robert Heath
Glenn A. Hood
Robert Horton
Howard L. Hunt
David Hutchenson
Harold Kaplan
Philip Kearny
Irving Klaus
EXPERTISE

Genetic
Toxicology
Avian
Toxicology
ADDRESS

Case Western Reserve
 University
Cleveland, OH

Patuxent Wildlife
 Research Center
Laurel, MD
Rodenticide,   Denver Wildlife
Repellent and   Research Center
Chemosterilant Federal Center
Development    Denver, CO
Senior
Research
Health
Advisor

Insect
Toxicology
Nutrition/
Toxicology
Toxicology/
Physiology
Avian
Toxicology
Avian
Toxicology
                                       EPA
                                       Research Triangle
                                        Park, NC
EPA
ARC-East
Beltsville, MD

Associate Professor
Veterinary Medical
 School
Sinclair Research
 Farm
University of
 Missouri
Columbia, MO

Southern Illinois
 University
Carbondale, IL

Agricultural Research
 Station
USDA
Beltsville, MD

Patuxant Wildlife
 Research Center
U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Laurel, MD

-------
                  CONTACTS AND CONSULTANTS
                        (continued)
Seorge Levinskas
Mark Lewis
Ray Linder
Keith R. Long
William Lower
John Luteman
John McCanne


R. L. Metcalf
EXPERTISE

Avian
Toxicology

Behavioral
Toxicologist
Effects of
Pesticide
Residues on
Pheasant
Population
Environmental
Toxicology
Genetics
Supervisor or
Director -
Beltsville
Laboratories

Rodenticide
Research

Pesticide &
Aquatic
Model
Ecosystems
ADDRESS

Monsanto Corporation
St. Louis, MO

FAA Civil
 Aeromedical Insti-
 tute
AAC - 1186 6
P.O. Box 25082
Oklahoma City,OK
73125

South Dakota Coop-
 erative Wildlife
 Unit
South Dakota State
 University
Brooking, SD  57006

Director
Institute of Agri-
 cultural Medicine
University of Iowa
Iowa City, IA 52241

Environmental Trace
 Substance Center
University of
 Missouri
Columbia, MO

Building 402
ARA - East
EPA
Beltsville, MD

EPA
Beltsville, MD

Professor
Department of
 Entomology
University of Illinois
Urbana,  IL  61801

-------
                  CONTACTS AND CONSULTANTS
                        (continued)
David Mick
Howard L. Morton
John Mulder
L. D. Newsom
John J. Raisweiler
Jane F. Robens


John Santolucito
Peter Savarie
Ed Schafer
                        EXPERTISE
               ADDRESS
Environmental  Department of Envi-
Toxicologist    ronmental Quality
               State of Iowa
               Des Moines, IA

Toxicologist-  Agricultural Research
                        Honeybees
Director,
Animal
Laboratory
Resources

Environmental
Toxicology
Bats -
Breeding &
Maintenance
Toxicologist
Behavioral
Toxicity
Pest Control
Evaluation
Bird Damage
Control and
Chemical
Development
 Station
USD A
Tucson, AZ

Michigan State Uni-
 versity
East Lansing, MI
Louisiana State
 University
Baton Rouge, LA

Department of Medi-
 cine
Columbia University
New York, NY

Hoffman-LaRouche
Nutley, NJ

National Environ-
 mental Research
 Center
EPA
Research Triangle
 Park, NC

Denver Wildlife
 Research Center
Federal Center
Denver, CO

Denver Wildlife
 Research Center
Federal Center
Denver, CO

-------
                  CONTACTS AND CONSULTANTS
                        (continued)
Dale Schwindamer
Joan Sovker
William Stebbins
Lucille Stickel
William Stickel
Gary Van Gelder
S. Bradleiqh
    Vinson

Ralph C. Wandes
EXPERTISE

USDA Registry
List of
Animal Care
Facilities

Rodent
Toxicology
Oto
Toxicologist
Avian
Toxicology
Avian
Toxicology
Behavioral
Toxicology
Entomologist
Director,
Toxicity
Information
Center
ADDRESS

UCDA
Washington, D.C.
University of
 Virginia Medical
 School
Charlottesville, VA

Kresge Hearing
 Research Institute
University of Michi-
 gan College of
 Medic Jne
University of Michi-
 gan
Ann Arbor, MI 48104

Patuxant Wildlife
 Research Center
U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Laurel, MD

Patuxant Wildlife
 Research Center
U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Laurel, MD

Chairman
Department of Anatomy
 and Physiology
Veterinary Medical
 School
University of
 Missouri
Columbia, MO

Texas, A & M
College State, TX

National Academy of
 Science

-------
                  CONTACTS AND CONSULTANTS
                         (continued)
Bernard Weiss
Larry Wing
Peter N. Witt
Robert Wolf
James C. Yarbrough
Robert Yeager
Ray Zimmerman
EXPERTISE

Behavioral
Toxicology
Wildlife
Management/
Pesticide
Residues
Spiders -
Drug Testing
Infectious
Disease
Effect of
Pesticides
on Aquatic
Vertebrates
Executive
Secretary
of Animal
Division

Avian
Research
ADDRESS

University of
 Rochester
Rochester, NY

Associate Professor
Department of Zoology
Science Hall II
Room 105
Iowa State University
Ames, IA

Division of Research
North Carolina Depart-
 ment of Mental
 Health
Raleigh, NC

Delta Primate Re-
 search Center
Tulane University
Covington, LA 70435

Professor
Department of Zoology
Mississippi State
 University
State College, MS
39762

National Academy of
 Science
Washington, D.C.
Ralston Purina Co.
St. Louis, MO

-------
   APPENDIX B




LIST OF SUPPLIERS

-------
    SCIENTIFIC
                                         COMMON
                                                              KEY
    INVERTEBRATES

    Lumbricus terrestris


    Helix  sp

    Gryllus sp

    Apis melliferra

    Drosophila sp


    Praying mantids

    Tenebrio  sp


    Musca  domestica


    HEKPETOFAUNA

    Rana pipiens
   Ambystoraa mexicanum

   Chelydra serpentina

   Terrapene sp


   Anolis carolinensis


   Phrynosoma cornutuia

   Thamnophis sirtails
   BIRDS

   Anas platyrhynchos

   Branta canadensis

   Ardeola sp

   Tyto alba

   Columba sp.


   Colinus virginianus

   Phasianus sp

   Sturnis vulgaris
earthworm


land snail

cricket

honey bee

fruit fly



mealworm


housefly



Leopard frog



Mexican axolotl

Snapping turtle

box turtle


Anole


horned lizard

garter snake


rat snake



mallard

Canada goose

egret

barn owl

pigeon


bobwhite

pheasant

starling
CON, GEL, HER, LEM,
NBL, STE

STE

LEM, MAZ, NBL, STE

STE

CON, GEL, MAZ, NBL
STE

MAZ, STE

CON, GEL, LEM, MAZ,
NBL, STE, TAR

MAZ, STE
BEI,
LAJ,
NIC,
WES

HAC

LEM,

LEM,
ZOO

CHC,
MAZ,

MAZ

CHC,
STE,
                                                                   CON,  GEL,  HOP,
                                                                   LEM,  MAZ,  NBL,
                                                                   SHE,  STE,  TAR,
MAZ, STE, ZOO

MAZ, STE, TAR,
GEL, HER, LEM,
TAR
                                                                   MAZ,  PET,  SAI,
                                                                   TAR,  WHI
                                                              PET,  WHI,  ZOO
ADV, MAZ, TRS

ADV, MAZ, TRS

SAI

CHC, MAZ

AIM, LEM, MAZ, RAI,
RID, STE, TOT, TRS

BRN, MAX, THR, TRS

RED

BRN
Source:  7

-------
                                       (CONTINUED)
SCIENTIFIC

BIRDS(continued)

Passer domesticus

Callus domesticus



MAMMALS

Eptesicus fuscus

Sylvilagus sp.

Dipodomys sp.

Neotoma lepida

Slgmodon hispidus

Spermophilus beecheyi


Tamias striatus

Eutamias sp.

Peromyscus maniculatus

Myocaster coypus

Hustela vison

Ovis sp.


Sus scrofa


Saimiri  sciureus



Didelphis virginianus

Daysypus novemcinctus
COMMON



house sparrow

chicken
big brown bat

cottontail

kangaroo rat

pack rat

cotton rat

California ground
 squirrel     '

Eastern chipmunk

Western chipmunk

deer mouse

nutria

mink

sheep


swine, miniature


squirrel raonkey



opossum

armadillo
                     KEY
MAZ

BAB, COF, HAB, MAZ,
RED, THE, TOW
MAZ, NIC, ZOO

ANM, MAZ

PET, PFI, RID, WHI

MAZ

PET, RID

LOK, MAZ, RID, TOT


RID, TOT, WHI, ZOO

2OO

MAZ,

ANM,

mink
ADV,
STM

HRL,
VIV

BRP,
SDA,
ZOO
PET

CHC, MAZ

ranches

BAR, BUB, CLA,
LIT, MAZ, TRF,
FDI, PRL, RID,
WAC, WHI, ZOF,
ANM, MAZ, RID, SAI
                     ANM,
                     LOK,
                     SAI,
     BRN, CHC, FRE,
     MAZ, PFI, RID,
     TAR, ZOO

-------
                                        (CONTINUED)
ADV
ANM
BAB
BAR
BEI
BRN
BRP
BUB
CHC
CLA
COF
CON
FDI
FRE
GEL
Adventure Hill
Edith Tramutola
R.F.D.
Clinton, New Jersey 08809

Animals, Inc.
Dr. Jon Kenneth Ferguson
Route 1, Box 395
Wharton, Texas  77488

Babcock Poultry Farm, Inc.
Dr. Jack F. Hill
P.O. Box 280
Ithaca, New York  14850

Bar-Wan Rabbitry & Kennels, Inc.
L. M. Barnfield
Route 1, Box 60
Crocker, Missouri  65452

Beauraanor Farms
Thomas' G. Herrick
1712 Sheridan Road
Cleveland, Ohio  44121

Bronson Tropical Birds
Julien Bronson
70 Nagle Avenue
New York, New York  10040

Blue Ribbon Pet Farm, Inc.
John H. Marolf
8772 S.W. 131st Street
Miami, Florida  33158
                                               HAB
      Richard Bubolz
      Route #2
      Rio, Wisconsin
                53960
                                Inc.
      Charles P. Chase Company,
      Charles P. Chase
      7330 N.W. 66th Street
      Miarai, Florida  33166
George Clauss
18-19 Saddle River Rd.
Fairlawn, New Jersey  07410

Colonial Poultry Farms, Inc.
M. R. Irwin
Pleasant Hill, Missouri  64080

Connecticut Valley Biological
 Supply Co., Inc.
Michael L. Taylor
Valley Road
Southampton, MA  01073

Fauna Distributors, Inc.
Miguel A. Campo
2286 N.W. 36th Street
Miami, Florida  33142

Alton V. Freeman
Spruce Pine, NC  28777

CCM:  General Biographical, Inc.
 Order Desk
8200 South Hoyne Avenue
Chicago, Illinois  60620
                                               HER
                                               HOF
                                               HRL
                                               LEM
                                               LIT
                                         LOK
                                         MAZ
                                               NBL
                                               NIC
                                               PET
                                               PFI
                                               PRL
Hall Brothers Hatchery, Inc.
Mrs. A. B. Hall
200 Cool; Hill Road
Wallingford, Connecticut  06492

Hacienda Aquatics
John A. Kopec
P.O. Box 218
La Puente, CA  91747

Hermosa Reptile and Wild Animal
 Farm, Inc.
Charles McClung
P.O. Box 182
219 Pacific Coast Highway
Hermosa Beach, CA  90254

E. G. Hoffman & Son
Earl A. Hoffman
P.O. Box 815
Oshkosh, Wisconsin  54901

The Hormel Institute, University
 of Minnesota
J. Hobart Belknap
801 16th Avenue N.E.
Austin, Minnesota  55912

The Lemberger Company
Sheldon Antall
1222 W. South Park Avenue
Oshkosh, Wisconsin  54901
Norman B. Little
P.O. Box 382
Rocky Hill, Connecticut
                                                                              06067
                                               Otto Martin Locke
                                               P.O. Drawer 731
                                               New flraunfels, TX
                                                                        78130
George Mazur Enterprises, Inc.
Ben Sherman
77 Eye Street, S.E.
Washington, D.c.  20003

National Biological Laboratories, Inc.
Frank S. Blasdell
P.O. Box 511
236 Dominion Road
Vienna, Virginia  22180

J. C. Hicholls, Jr.
Biological Collector
Murphy, NC  28906

The Pet Corral
Norman Nye
4146 Oracle Road
Tucson, Arizona  85705

Pet Farm, Inc.
Dr. B. M. Levine
3310 »W South River Drive
Miami, Florida  33142

Primelabs, Inc.
Dr. James H. Vickers
Monmouth County Airport
Farmingdale, NJ  07727

-------
                                         (CONTINUED)
RAI   Research Animals, Inc.
      Norman or Pete Weissraan
      Box 405
      Braddock, PA  15104

RED   Redwood Game Farms and Laboratories
      David G. or Norzna S. Lewis
      1955 North Redwood Road
      Salt Lake City, UT  84116

RID   Rider Animal Company, Inc.
      V. D. Rider
      R.R. *2, Box 270
      Brooksville, FL  33512

SAI   Safari Animal Imports, Inc.
      Frederick W. Thorpe
      7703 N.W. 36th Avenue
      Miami, FL  33147

SDA   San Diego Animal Supply
      James M. P.obinson, Jr.
      P.O. Box 544
      Lemone Grove, CA  92045

SHE   J. R. Schettle Biologicals
      J. R. Schettle
      P.O. Box 184
      Stillwater, MN  55082

STM   Stumbo Farms
      Donald L. Stumbo
      O'Neil Road
      Lima, NY  14485

TAR   Tarpon Zoo, Inc.
      Trudie Jerkins or Fred Penman
      P.O. Box 847
      Tarpon Springs, FL  33589

THR   Three Springs Kennel Company, Inc.
      W. J. or Paul R. Haas
      R.D. II
      Zelienople, PA  16063

TOT   Tote Em In Zoo
      Mr. Tregembo
      Route 2, Box 368
      Wilmington, NC  28401

TOW   Town Line Poultry Farm
      Henry E. Geerlings
      4198 96th Avenue
      Zeeland, MI  49464

TRF   Thompson Research Foundation
      Crosby L. Brownson
      Box 97, Postal Route II
      Monee, IL  60449

TRS   Truslow Farms, Inc.
      John U. Truslow
      Chestertown, MD  21620

VIV   Vita Vet Laboratories
      Forest E. Conder
      1600 West 26th St.
      Marion, IN  46952
MAC   Woodard Asiatic Corporation
      Dr. Geofli«.y Woodard
     .12310 Pinecrest Toad
      Herndon, VA  22070

WES   Weston Research Laboratories, Inc.
      Fritz Oyen
      Route 1, Box 33
      Purcellville, VA  22132

WHI   White Animal Farm
      Helen D. Perley
      Seavey's Landing Road
      West Scarboro, ME  04074

ZOF   Zoological Fauna
      J. Patrick McHale
      1526   West Highland Avenue
      Chicago, IL  60626

ZOO   Zoological Center, International
      Ray Pawley
      15W506 W. 63rd Street (Burr Ridge)
      Hinsdale, IL  60521

-------
           APPENDIX C




SUGGESTED SPECIES SYNOPSIS SHEETS

-------
 LUMBRICUS TERRESTRIS
 Description  Segmented, cylindroid invertebrate with body length
             from 6 to 12".



 AVail3Qility  Found in most moist soil areas of the world; readily
             available from biological supply houses and bait dealers,
             Readily available; breeds easily in lab;  easy and cheap
             maintenance; ecologically important.
             Light - natural photoperiod;  temperature - 50°F for
             breeding.


             Any size container having drainage holes covered with
Cage         screen and filled with gravel,  dung, soil, and peat
             moss is sufficient'for a limited number of worms; 4x8x2'
             bin can support 50,000 worms.

FOOd         Peat moss, manure, leaf mold, sod, decaying organic
             material, chick starter, cornmeal; special needs
             include moisture and substrate mixture of pW 7.


Water        Moisture necessary at all times.

Parasites &  Disease
_    .          _         Breeds well in loose substrate of one part
Breeding &  Rearing      dung, 3 parts soil, and 5 parts peat moss if
                         space, moisture & temperature is optimal;
                         eggs deposited in small cocoons throughout
                         substrate.
Special Costs

Restrictions
Toiicological  Studies     2?, 28, 29, 30, 32, 33, 34,  35,  36,  37,  38,
                         39
Ecological  Alternatives   snails.
Physiological  Parameters

-------
HELIX ASPERSA
Food
             Land snail; commonly called the garden snail; life
             expectancy-unknown.
             Found in temperate areas of world; relatively
             abundant in most moist areas.
             Mainly nocturnal; can be bred and reared successfully
             in the laboratory.
             Temperature, 23°C; constant moisture required by
             active snails.
Colonies kept in wood boxes, 55x40x28cm; 5cm layer
of damp soil; box covered with aluminum screen; quart
fruit jars with 5cm of damp soil in bottom can be used
for breeding.

Lettuce and fresh vegetables.
             Sufficient moisture must be present at all times

Parasites &  Disease
                     Sexual maturity-4 months; avg. number of eggs
         &  Rearing  laid-53  (about 10 eggs survive hatching); eggs
                     are laid in 5cm of soil in bottom of jar and
                     are 3mm in diameter; usually laid during wet
                     season; photoperiod important in egg laying.
Special Costs

Restrictiois
lexicological  Studies  42, 46, 4?, 48, 49,  50
           Alternatives   Earthworms, some herbivorous insects.

Physiological  Parameters

-------
 Availability
MILAX sp.


             Shell-less mollusc, body 1/2 to 2" long,




             Some suppliers.
             Snail-like, active day and night, produces large
             amounts of mucous
             Light-natural photoperiod; temperature - should
             fluctuate around 20°; relative humidity - over 70%
Cage         Material-all glass aquaria, any large waterproof
             container; substrate - peat-soil.
             Vegetables, such as carrots, potatoes.
             Unchlorinated, unpolluted.

Parasites &  Disease
         &  Rearing    Reproduction stimulated by fluctuating
                  6    temperature around 20°C.
Special Costs
Restrictions

lexicological  Studies


Ecological  Alternatives     snails.
Physiological  Parameters

-------
ARANEUS DIADEMATUS
             Small orb-weaving  spiders  about  2/5  to  1"  long.
 Availability  Common orb-weaver  of  the  Eastern  U.S.;  most dependable
 HI dlldUllllJ  source of  spiders  is  Mr.  Leonard  Pankhurst,  204
             Stroud St., Canastota,  NY,  13034   (52)  .
             Easy maintenance;  ecologically important;  web-building
             is a useful  experimental  tool.
             Light -  13L:11D  photoperiod;  temperature - temperature
             change important (colder  at night) .
Cage         50  x  50  x 10cm aluminum enclosures with removable
              glass windows  suitable to study web patterns (52).


Food         Flies, mealworms.
              Provided  by  syringe  administration or saturated cotton
              ball.
Parasites & Disease
Breeding  & Rearing      Minimal breeding in lab;  cocoons of fall
                         may  be  hatched in the lab under correct
                         conditions.

Special Costs

Restrictions
lexicological Studies    53. 1124


Ecological  Alternatives   centipedes.
Physiological Parameters

-------
GRYLLUS PENNSVLVANICUS
            Dark-colored insect with an adult body lenath of 1/2"
            large hind legs adapted for jumping (57) .


            Found ^n pastures, meadows, roadsides, fields and homes
            all Qver the 0>s> (316) .  readily available through com-
            ercial suppliers and bait dealers.
r63tlir6S    Readily available; easy maintenance and breedability
            in lab.
            Light - 16L:8D photoperiod; temperature - 24°C; relative
            humidity - 60 to 65%
Cage
            42 x 18 x 18" stock aluminum cages for 250 adults;
            11 x 7 x 8" glass aquarium for 500 nymphs; (Note: moist
            sand substrate should be avaiblable for oviposition).
Food
            Mixture of biscuit meal, dried milk, Bemax and dried
            yeast in ratio 50:5:40:5; greens should be supplied
            once a week  (62).
            Constant supply.
Parasites &  Disease
Breeding &  Rearing


Special Costs
Restrictions
                        Some crickets breed all year while others
                        breed once a year  (58);   oviposition should
                        occur in moist sand; hatching may occur in
                        petri dishes; incubation - 15 days at 24.0°C;
                        hatching takes place after 3 month diapause
                        period at 4.0°c (62).
lexicological  Studies    71
           lliernotiiior
           fUicrndllTCS
Physiological  Parameters
                        Roaches ' grasshoppers, praying mantids, pre-
                        daceous beetles and other herbivorous insects,

-------
STAGMOMANTIS CAROLINA - praying manticl
             Large, elongate, slow-moving insects with modified
             front legs  (57);   body length - about  2".
Availability
             Found mainly in the Southern U.S., readily obtainable
             from commercial suppliers.
Features
             Fairly available, good breedability in lab  (61).
Laboratory
             Light - natural protoperiod; temperature - 75 to  80°F;
             relative humidity - 50 to 70%.
Cage
             Glass jar or box closed with small mesh screen and
             provided with small sticks and a potted house plant
             is sufficient for a pregnant female  (61) .
Food
             Any living insect of appropriate size,  for example,
             live house flies, blue-bottle flies, grasshoppers,
             grubs.
             Should be given to mantid everyday with medicine

r2raSlt6S &  UlSCaS6     Host for certain parasitic flies and
                         some mites.
Breeding &  Rearing


Special Costs
Restrictions
                         Mantids lay a dozen to 400 eggs enclosed
                         in ootheca; trees are ootheca deposition
                         sites; eggs over winter and hatch  in  spring
                         and early summer; eggs may be hatched in
                         lab under correct light, temperature,  and
                         nutrition conditions.

                         Cannabalistic tendencies.
Toxicologies!  Studies
Ecological  Alternatives
Physiological  Parameters
                         Crickets, roaches, grasshoppers, other
                         herbivorous insects, predaceous beetles,

-------
BLISSUS LEUCOPTERUS



             Pest insect with body length of 3.5mm    (57); nonflying.
Mdlldullliy  Found in wheat, corn rye and barley fields in U.S. with
             some abundance.
             Fairly abundant; economically important; probability of
             easy maintenance and breedability in lab is good.
             Light - natural photoperiod; temperature -  "room".
                                                              t

Cage         No special cage requirement; Blissus may be reared  in
             small glass tubes  (as in done with milkweed bugs) .
             Organic plant fluids  (57) .
Water       with  food.

Parasites &  Disease
      ing  & Rearing    Eggs laid in May in ground;  several  hundred
                       eggs hatch a week to 10 days 'after laying;
                       nymphs mature at 4 to  6 weeks.


Special Costs

Restrictions
lexicological Studies
           Alternatives Milkweed bugs_and other  herbivorous
„,.,.,_        invertebrates.
Physiological  Parameters

-------
 EMPHOASA FABAE, XEROPHLOEA MAJOR - leaf hoppers



             Small  hopping insects about 1/4 to 1/2" in length (57).



 I   "I h'l'f   Found  all over U.S.  on all types of plants; easy to cap-
 AV3ll3Qllliy  ture with insect net.  (Note:   use only one abundant
             species  specific to  geographical area in testing  (121) .
             Abundant;  high probability of ease of maintenance and
             breedability in lab;  economically important pest.
             Light  -  natural  photoperiod;  temperature - "room".
            An aquarium of  sufficient size with small mesh screen
            roof;  soil, water,  and specific food of selected leaf-
            hopper should be  available.
             Specific  food plant depends on leafhopper used (for ex-
             ample,  Erythroneura prefers apple leaves  (121).
            Available  with  food.

P2rasites  & Disease
          & Resting       Most have one generation per year; some
                          have two or three generations per year.
Special Costs
Restrictions

Toxicologies! Studies
           Alternatives   Tree hoppers,  froghoppers,  planthoppers.
Physiologies!  Parameters

-------
TRIBOLIUM sp.
Description
     Flour beetle;  length-to 5mm,
 Availability   Abundant  in  flour waste;  suppliers.
 Features
Cage
              Light-unknown; temperature-21 to 27°C; relative
              humidity-unknown.
     Glass jars.
              Flour, dog  food,  fruits .
              Obtained  from  food
Parasites &  Disease
Ł  Doorinn     10° adults in 2 liter jar with flour;  life
ft  Rearing
                       cycle  compieted  in  8  weeks.
Special Costs
Restrictions

lexicological  Studies  so
           Alternatives other  granivorous- beetles.
Physiological  Parameters

-------
TENEBRIO  sp.
              Mealworms; length 13 to 17 nun; dark color-larvae yellov
              Very abundant around  food  stores,  suppliers



 Features
              Light-natural photoperios; temperature-over  30°C;
              relative humidity-70%.
 Cage         Size-60x50x50cm; material-anything easy  to  clean
              ventilation necessary.



 pflnH         Grain, dog food, fruits.
              Obtained in moist  food.

 Parasites  & Disease
          & Rearing  Sexual maturity-depends on  temp,  and r.h.;
                     life cycle-complete  in 4  to 6 months;  breed
                     year-round,

Special Costs

Restrictions
lexicological Studies
           Alternatives   Other phytophagous beetles.

Physiological  Parameters

-------
CARPOCAPSA POMONELLA
             Small pest moth  (57)
Availability
             Found  all over U.S., usually on  foliage,  fruits  or
             nuts (57) .
Fe3tlireS      High  potential  for  easy breeding  and maintenance in
              lab;  economically important  pest.
              Careful balance  of  temperature  and humidity (87,  88)
Cage
             53.3 x  30.5 x 7.6cm stainless steel trays with 10-13mm
             layer of burrowing medium on bottom (87).
Food
             Wheat  germ, soybean meal, rice  flour, pinto  beans,
             alfalfa meal, cottonseed meal,  corn meal,  carrot
             powder (87) .
              Should be available  in food.

Parasites &  Disease
Breeding &  Rearing


Special Costs
Restrictions
                         Larvae may be reared  in lab  from eggs in
                         6  oz. wax paper cups  with  cardboard lids
                         (88).
                          Cannibalistic  larvae.
lexicological  Studies
Ecological  Alternatives
Physiological  Parameters

-------
     AGROTIS YPSILON
UBS Cl ijJliuli  Heavy-bodied moths  having a  wingspan of 1 to 2 inches
             (57).
             In  the  largest family of lepidopterans ;  attracted
             to  lights  at night for easy capture.
             Have  potential  for routine  breeding and rearing in
             lab;  economically important.
             Light-light:  dark photoperiod;  temperature - 80+2°F.
Cage         20  adults  held in 12  x 12  x 16"  glass panel cages.
rOOu         Rearing medium includes  lima beans,  pinto beans,
             brewer's yeast,  ascorbic acid,  agar  & water  (88);
             dental  cotton plugs soaked in 10% dextrose solution
             is  good nutrient (86)-;  larvae  fed red clover or
Wa»pr        tobacco.
ndm        Available in food.
Parasites &  Disease
         &  Rearing  Gallon jars with moist paper serve as laying
                     environments;  larvae may be placed in 12 x 8
                     x 2"  pyrex trays with 1 inch of moistened soil:
                     post  fifth instar larvae placed in small flint
        fitctc        jars  with 1.5" layer of substrate containing
        lOSIS        6% moisture (86).

KcSinCllunS          Larval forms are cannibalistic.
lexicological  Studies

Ecological  Alternatives   other noctuid moths
Physiological  Parameters

-------
MUSCA DOMESTICA
                    house fly with body length of 1/2"; longevity
             may be one year.



Availability   Sometimes considered the most couonon animal known to
             man.
             Easy maintenance and breedability; veteran of previ-
             ous research; economically important.
             Light - natural photoperiod; temperature - 27.5+l°C;
             relative humidity - 50 to 55%.
             45x45x 45cm wooden cage with screen side for easy
             cleaning  (98). .


rftn|i         Adults - shallow dish of sugar; larvae - dog bisguits,
• "00         fish, wheat bran, alfalfa meal, baker's yeast, malt
             extract, manure,  sugar and water.


             Water-soaked cotton balls should be available at all
             times.

P2r3SiteS  & Disease     Serve as vectors for numerous diseases
                          (b /) •


                         Adults transferred to gauge-lined plywood
Breeding  & R63riflŁ      cage; milk-water soaked cotton balls are
                         placed in cage for oviposition site; egg-
                         laden cotton balls placed in muslin-covered
                         jars where hatch larvae pupate; pupae placed

Special Costs            in adult cage to emerge  (98)"

Restrictions
lexicological Studies    so,  ioa,  109,  in,  113,  114,  115,  eis
r   .  .  .  ...    ..      Blowflies, stable flies, other  suitable
Ecological  Alternatives   diPtera.
Physiological Parameters

-------
DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER
             Small flies about 3 to 4mm in body length (57) .
             Common throughout U.S.; college campuses use cultures
Availability   or <3enetic demonstrations; Contact; Drosophila Infer
AT dlldUllllJ  mation Science Department of Biology, University of
             Oregon, Eugene, Oregon  97430.
             Easy to breed and maintain in lab; veteran of previ-
             ous research; good model for population studies.
             Light - normal photoperiod; temperature -  "room".
Cage
             Drosophila can be raised in baby food jars with no
             problems.
             A banana-agar or banana-meal mixture in the bottom of
             a jar is suitable nutrition  (102).
Water
Parasites &  Disease
     ing &  Rearing
                         Place adults in baby food jar with  correct
                         medium and culture becomes self-pertuating
Special Costs
Restrictions
lexicological  Studies
                         116'  117'  us,  119,
                         Shore flies, other small dipterans.
Physiological  Parameters

-------
APIS MELLIFERA.
             Social insect having a body length of approximately
             3/4".



AfdlldDllliy  only honeybee to occupy the U.S.; readily obtainable
             from beekeepers throughout the U.S.  (57).

             Easy to keep and work with; good model for study of
             the effects of chemicals on social organizaiton, pop-
             uation dynamics and behavior; ecologically important.
             Light - natural photoperiod; temperature - ambient.
             6x6x2" cage for 100 bees  (121)  in field or  lab.
             60% sucrose and pollen  (121) .
\jjf3tfjf        Available in food.

Parasites &  Disease

                       Self-perpetuating in most cases  for  at least
     ina  Ł  Daarina    a season w^en established outdoors;  reproduc-
     liig  «  n63nng    tive uncertainty arises when colonies  are
                       brought into the lab; nest boxes are necessary
                       for colony (57) .
     IBI COStS          Special bee handling equipment.
Restrictions

lexicological Studies   us,  122,  123,  124,  126, 128, 129


Ecological Alternatives Bumblebee.
Physiological Parameters

-------
ISOPODA
            Gray to black crawling  crustaceans;  doros-ventrally
            flattened body;  length,  5  to 15  cm (687).
AV3il3biHtV   400° marine  species;  only pill bugs or wood lice are
          '   truly terrestrial; wood  lice found in great numbers
             in moist  areas  under  boards  and in logs.


F63ttireS     Some terrestrial isopods have ability to roll
             up in bail for  protection and prevention of water
             loss  (687).


             Light-natural photoperiod; temperature "room".
             Terreriums  of  any size filled with moist soil and
             having  abundant detritis-


             Algae,  moss, bark,  decaying vegetable and animal     ^
             matter;  some terrestrial species are parasitic on
             ants, and some are carnivorous.


 Water       Moist areas; organisms reac^; to  water loss by rolling
 n    ..    B ijxto ball (687).
 Parasites  & Disease
          0 Rearing   Eggs  brooded in a marsupium after fertilization
                  »   postlarvae hatching stage with last pair of   !
                      legs  incompletely developed  (687).


 Special  Costs

 Restrictions
 lexicological  Studies
131
 Ecological Alternatives    Millipede,  termite.
 Physiological Parameters

-------
CHILOPODA - centipedes
             Wormlike, or heavy-bodied; length from 1'  in tropics

             to 1" or 2" in North America  (687).
             Most are confined to the moist environment beneath

             stones and wood and in soil; found the world over (687)
             Poison gland in claws; only active on surface of ground

             at night; slow but prolific reproducers  (687).
laboratory
p            Terrariums of any size, filled with moist soil, having

"•§8         plenty  of cover  (rocks, wood) and small arthropods.
FflOd         Small arthropods mainly; will eat toads, small snakes
             and small mice  (687).



Water

Parasites &  Disease
         Ł  Dgaring   Sexes distinguishable; some species lay  and
                  "   brood their eggs, others simply lay the  eggs;
                      years are required to reach sexual 'maturity.


Special Costs

ftestrictiois



lexicological  Studies 130




Ecological  Alternatives  spiders.

Physiological  Parameters

-------
RANA PIPIENS
              leopard frog, head and body  2"  to  5";  life  expectancy
              2 to  3 years.
AV3ii3biiity   Numerous suppliers; ponds/ quiet waters  throughout
             U.S.
 F63tlir6S         Amphibian, insectivorous; reacts to movement.
             Light-regular photoperiod; temperature of water,
             18 to 20°C.
             Large tanks with aquatic and terrestrial areas
              (22"xl4"xl4" for 25 adults  for  short periods).


 p g Q (j        Cooked lettuce, cooked greens,  trout chow, liver
             bits, pond plankton, larvae, mosquitoes, flies,
             crickets.

 Wot or       Unchlorinated, unf lour ida ted, unpolluted; moist
             conditions necessary.
 r3r3SlteS  a UIS63S6   Many natural internal and  external parasites
                       New arrivals should be quarantined and
                       checked.


 DT66Qtng  & Rearing    External insemination in water,  embryos
                       in shallow enamel pans; 100's of eggs from
                       each female; generation time is 13 to 15
                       months•

 Special tOStS          Large operation may need special water
                       treatment.

 ReStriCllOfiS           No spinach in diet (may cause kidney stones);
                       clean water necessary.


 lexicological Studies  147, i4a, 149, iso, 151, 152, 153,  154, 155,
                       758


 ECOlOgiC3l Alternatives     Turtles, lizards, toads, salamanders.

 Physiological Parameters

-------
 AMBYSTOMA MEXICANUM
Description
Availability
 Features
Partially or completely nebl-onous slamander having a
length of 30cm (142).
Found in nature only in Mexico; may be obtained from
commercial suppliers  (142) ; being bred at University
of Michigan Amphibian facility (137) ;; veteran of
scientific research.

Feirly available; breedable in lab (artificial ferti-
lization) ; veteran in lab situation (142) .
 Laboratory
Light - natural photoperiod; temperature - water tem-
perature of 14° to 18°C.
 Cage
50 x 100 x 35cm asbestos cement container houses 10
adults; no sand, gravel or plants are needed (142).
 Food
Beef heart, liver; vitamins (142).
             Unchlorinated water  necessary (142).
 Parasites  & Disease      rungai infections (142).
 Breeding  & Rearing


 Special  Costs
 Restrictions
            Sexual maturity reached in one year;  breeding
            season from December to June; eggs  laid  vary
            between 200 to 2,000 per spawning;  "hatching"
            occurs after 2 weeks  (142)  ; usually  2 spawn-
            ings per year.
 lexicological Studies    ieo, 152
 Ecological Alternatives   °ther
 Physiological Parameters

-------
 TERRAPENE SP.
            Dry  land-turtles with  body  lengths  of 4  to 6.5";  ages
            of 30  to  40 years  are  common;  some  live  to be a century
            old  (133).


Availability Found  all over most  of the U.S. in woodland areas;  avail-
            able in pet stores.
            Available;  long  lived  for chronic testing;  hardy,  main-
            tains extremely  well in  captivity.
            Light - natural photoperiod;  temperature - "room".
            Dry  tanks  (130  x  72cm)  with water available for drinking
             (165) ; terraria with  dirt  for turtle to dig in, and wate
            for  occasional  immersion.
            Gound horsemeat  and lettuce (165) ;   raw hamburger and
            table scraps  (133) .
Water      M libitum
           & DiSeBSe      Tuberculosis,  Salmonella,  assorted
                          parasites.


          9 Dairinn       Spring mating  is usually the case; 3 to 6
          & Rearing       leathery  eggs  are laid in June or July;
                          eggs  hatch  in  September (1192); eggs may
                          be  collected from natural nest sites for
                          rearing.
Special Costs

ReStriCtlOflS               Breeding  in captivity difficult.



Toiicological Studies     167'  18°
Ecological  Alternatives    species  of
Physiological  Parameters

-------
CHELYDRA SERPENTINA
             Large, short-tempered turtle; 8 to 12" body length;
             10 to 35 Ibs. (133).
JtYdil3biHty   Southern Canada to Gulf of Mexico; Atlantic Ocean to
             Rockies; generally occupies a permanent body of fresh
             water (133).


             Hardy; good test animal when young; easy to maintain
             under lab conditions  (175);  economically important
             (133).


             Light - natural photoperiod;  temperature - "room".
pa_          Enclosed outdoor area (5 x 8") with shallow stone or
"•6*         concrete pond  (12 to 15" deep) and shelters in the
             form of logs or stumps (133) .


             Insects, small fish, earthworms, dog food, vegetation
             (175).
             Ad libitum

          &  DJS63S6     Tuberculosis; Salmonella; assorted
                         parasites (166) .


Rraaiiinn 9  Datrlnn      E99S laid in June'" clutch size between  20
DlCcUlllg «  Rearing      and 30 eggs; eggs hatch in September  and
                         October (1192).
Special Costs
                         Breeding in lab is questionable; handle
                         with care.
lexicological  Studies     147, 175,
           Alternatives   Macroclemys temmincki  (alligator snapping
«.            «.          turtle) .
Physiological  Parameters

-------
 ANOLIS CAROLINENSIS
            The false chameleon with a body  length of  5 to  7 1/2"
             (133).
Availability  Common in Southeastern U.S.; may be purchased  in pet
            stores  (133).
            Available, easy to maintain in  lab.
            Light - natural photoperiod; temperature  -  "room".
            Standard aquarium filled with  sandy  soil,  some plants
            and small branches  (133).
            Mealworms, wide variety of insects.
            Spray cage with water everyday  to supply  lizards with
            water.
Parasites  & Disease
          & Rearing      1 to 2 eggs per clutch;  6 to  9 clutches
                         per season  (1193).
Special Costs
                         Do not breed well  in captivity.
lexicological Studies     175,  iso,  148
           Alternatives   Eumeces, toads,  snakes.
Physiological  Parameters

-------
PHRYNOSOMA CORNUTUM
             Spiny lizard; body length - 2.5 to 4" (133).
RY3ll3Ulllty   Found in parts of Kansas, Texas, Arizona and northern

             Mexico   (133)  can be bought from pet stores.





F62tlir6S     Available; easy to maintain under lab conditions.
             Light - natural photoperiod; temperature -"room".
Cage         Aquarium filled with sandy soil, some plants, small

             branches, rock pile, and water dish  (133).
             Spiders, sowbugs, insects  (133).
             Ad.  libitum


Parasites  & Disease
Breeding  & Riarwg      14 to 37 e^gs ?er clutch; i or more
                         clutches per year  (1193) .
Special Costs

                         Poor breedability in lab.
Toxicological Studies
           Alternatives   Toads,  snakes,  Eumeces.


Physiological Parameters

-------
THAMNOPHIS SIRTALIS
              striped,  thin-bodied snake,  18  to 26  inches long  (133);
              Eastern  half  of  U.S.  (133); found in a wide variety of
              habitats in the  city  and country.
Features
Laboratory
             Available;  easy  to  maintain and handle in lab;  breeds   ]
             well  in  captivity giving  birth to many young at one
             time  (175).
                                                                     j
             Light-natural  photoperiod,  needed for heating purposes;1]
             temperature -  26o to  36°C;  relative humidity - 33 to 661!
              (171).
Cage
Food
              Terrariums with  tightly sealed lids;  pea gravel or
              artificial grass substrate;  rock or branches necessary
              for  ecdysis  (133, 171, 173).

              Frogs,  toads,  salamanders,  fish tadpoles, earthworms,
              chopped raw  fish (133).
              ad  libitum in  open bowls.

           & DiSeaSe      Ectoparasites  common.
Breeding  & Rearing
                                                                     i
                          Sexual  maturity reached in 1 to 2 years;    *
                          3  to  85 young  per clutch per season (1193). <
Special Costs
Restrictions
lexicological  Studies   I48'
                                 »  715
Ecological  Alternatives
Physiological  Parameters
                         Lizards,  turtles

-------
ELAPHE spv
             Large, constricting, handsome snakes having body
             lengths ranging from 24 to 72 inches (133) . ,


AV8il8l)ility   Found throughout most parts of U.S.  in trees, cliffs,
             fields, etc.  (133).
             Wide distribution; maintains extremely well in
             captivity.


I ah flf at (try   Light-natural photoperiod, needed for heating purposes,
         "   temperature - 26° to 36°C, relative humidity - 33 to 60%
             (171).


             Terrarium with tightly sealed lids; pea gravel or artificial
             grass substrate; rocks or branches necessary for
             ecdysis  (133, 171, 173).


             Mice, rats, small birds, lizards, frogs   (133).
             ad libitum in open bowls.

          &  DJSeaSe  Ectoparasites common
Breeding &  Rearing   i to 44 eggs per dutch.


Special Costs
                      Breedability in lab questionable,
Toiicological Studies  175,  iao,  715


Ecological  Alternatives Lizards'  turtle*.
Physiological Parameters

-------
 PHALACROCORAX AURITUS
D6SCript'lOn  Large,  dark/  water birds with long necks and tails;
             30  to  35"  body length  (221) .
             Common  on coasts,  inland lakes and rivers, generally in
             the  Eastern half of the U.S.   (221).                   ;
                top  of  their  food chain;  intelligent;  good short-
             term test  bird;  easy to obtain adults,  young and eggs;
             typical of fish-eating birds  (181) .


L3BOr3tOry   Light - natural  photoperiod; temperature  - young birds
             kept warm  with heating lamps  (181) .


             6x6'  cage made of wood,  cement,  chicken wire and
             indoor-outdoor carpet will house 6 cormorants; cage
             should  be  equipped with tree trunks and large water
             tanks for  bathing and drinking  (181) .


             Fish (181, 182)    and vitamin B supplement and ferrous j
             iron supplement;  grit required as  a digestive aid and  j
             mineral supplement (182) .                              I


             Ad  libitum (See  "cage").                               !

Parasites &  Disease
          & Rearing       Clutch size - 2 eggs;  one clutch per year;
                          colonial nesters (182, 183).


Special GOStS             Food  costs  high due to bird's appetite.

KeStMCtlORS               Somewhat hard to breed in captivity; takes
                          a  long time to reach sexual maturity; largf
                          bird  with enormous  appetite.

lexicological  Studies     188,  189
Ecological  Alternatives    GUHS  and  terns.
Physiological  Parameters

-------
PODILYMBUS PODICEPS
             A duck-like diver; body length - 12 to 15"   (221)
fiV3ll3ulllty   Found throughout the U.S.  and Canada,  near or in ponds,
             creeks and marshes  (221) .
             Diurnal and migratory; fairly abundant.
             Light - natural photoperiod;  temperature - ambient.
Cage         Mallard specifications.
             In nature, they eat vertebrate and invertebrate aquatic
             organisms; grit needed as a digestive aid and mineral
             supplement.


             Ad libitum.

          &  Disease      Worms, ticks, fleas, lice, botulism.
         &  Rearing       2 eggs per clutch; one clutch per year;
                          young are precocial and nidifugous  (183)
Special Costs
                          Poor breeders in captivity
lexicological Studies     185


Ecological  Alternatives    Diving ducks .
Physiological Parameters

-------
ANAS PLATYRHYNCHOS
            A  familiar surface-feeding duck;  body length 20 to 28";
            Wei9ht  2  V2  to  3  1/>2 ^s->  life expectancy - 20 years
            in captivity,  16 years in wild.
            Found  in  wooded swamps,  marshes and ponds throughout me
            of  the U.S.   (221);  legislation exists which may limit
            wild bird testing.
Cage

Food

Water
Parasites
  Good availability; breeds easily in captivity;  large
  enough for large samples; representative waterfoul; adap
  well to small areas; healthy, stable and vigorous;  (3811
  important in sports and recreation.

  Light - 10D:14L photoperiod   (207) ; temperature -  "room!!

  8 x 14 x 7'  open wire mesh cage for natural environment i\
  testing, 20 to 25 birds per cage   (381); 30 x 15 x 6'
  recommended pen size for 5 adult birds, must be provided-
  with water area of 10" depth  (192); 30 x 15 x 6'  pen witti:
  nest boxes,  250 gallon water  troughs and feeders,  used ti
  breed mallards (194).                                   f

  Natural-grain, seeds, roots, water plants, snails,  insed
  small aquatic organisms  (1194) ; lab-commercial  game bird|
  ration usually supplemented with millet, cracked corn, vb
  milo and barley; grit needed  as digestive aid and  dietarf
  supplement (191, 192).
  Water available at all times  for drinking and recreation*;
&  Disease
Flies, true bugs, lice, protozoans, worms,
flukes; botulism.
Breeding  & Rearing

Special Costs
Restrictions

Toxicologica! Studies
              Sexual maturity - 1 to 2 yrs.;  5.1  to  9.3 eg|
              per clutch; renesting probability high;  incubj
              tion period of 21 to 28 days; 49 to 60 day f|
              ing period; newly-hatched young display  impr
              behavior; easy breeders in captivity (381).

              Cages have to be cleaned on a regular  basis;]
              cial floor covering materials keep  cleaning ^
              quency and expense minimal  (381).           j

              Territorial during breeding; crowding  should
              avoided; migration restlessness during certai
              periods of year.

              184, 192, 195, 197, 198, 199, 200,  201,  203,
              206, 208, 209, 210, 213, 1195
Ecological  Alternatives
Physiological  Parameters
              Other waterfowl.

-------
BRANTA CANADENSIS
            Largest of wild aeese; length - 35 to 43";  weight -
            8 to 13 pounds; (1194);  Longevity - 33 years in cap-
            tivity, 23 years in wild.


Availability Found in wet lands in most of North America during
            some part of the year (221).



            Canada geese keep well in captivity (1196).
            See mallard (Anas platyrhynchos)  synopsis.
Cage        See mallard (Anas platyrhynchos)  synopsis.


            Natural food - grain, grasses, green parts  of plants
Food        and small bits of animal matter (1194);  Lab food -
            commercial game bird ration; grit needed for digest-
            ive aid and mineral supplement.


UK 3 {Of       Should be available at all times  for drinking or bathing.

ParaSiteS &  DiSeaSfi     Flies, true bugs, lice, worms  and flukes
                         (1194);  may be susceptable to  botulism,
                         fowl cholera, avian  tuberculosis, and malaria.


BrPPfiino Ł  Pparino      Becomes sexually mature in 2 to 3 years; Nest
Dieeumg &  wearing      in earl^ spring/ usually mid-Aprii; 4 to ?
                         eggs laid per nesting; 28 day  incubation per-
                         iod; male and female guard nest; 63 to 86 day
                         fledging period; young take to water
Special COStS            immediately (1194).

iieStriCtiORS              Migratory restlessness; territorial during
                         mating season; protected by legislation.


TGXiCOlOgiCal  StUdieS     205,206,210,213, 248  (Note: See mallard
                         (Anas platyrhynchos) section for similar
                         references].


ECOlOgiCal  Alternatives   Other waterfowLof the world.

Physiological  Parameters

-------
PUFFINUS GRISEUS
Description
             Gull-like sea bird; body length 16 - 18"
Availability
 Features
             Sea bird found in Northern and Southern hemisphers
             along Atlantic, Gulf and Pacific coasts; most abun-
             dant in Pacific area (221, 1196).

             Migratory and diurnal; nasal salt glands allow bird
             convert sea water to fresh water.
             Sea birds do not  do well  in  the  laboratory.
Cage
             Cage provisions have not been fully documented for
             sea birds.
 Food
 Water
             In nature, they feed on fish, Crustacea, cephalopods |J
             and macrophy ton ; grit needed in diet as a digestive ai«
             and mineral supplement.
             Salt or fresh water should be provided at all  times. [\
 Parasites  & Disease
                         Ticks , worms, mites,  fleas,  lice.
 Breeding  & Rearing


 Special Costs
 Restrictions
                         Colonial nesters; usually one  egg  laid
                         year; incubation - 6 to  11 weeks;  13  to
                         week fledging period; sexual maturity usu-j
                         ally reached by second year; renesting poŁ'
                         sibiltiy high  (183, 215);   young  are
                         altrical and nidicolous.


                         Not easily maintained or bred  in captivity
                         slow reproducers.
lexicological Studies     218
Ecological  Alternatives
Physiological  Parameters
                                Or  terns.

-------
CASMERODIUS ALBUS
            Wading birds with long necks and legs and pointed bills;
            body length of 37-40" (221).



Availability  Found in marshes, coastal areas and rivers of the
            Eastern half of the U.S. (221).
            Fairly easy to maintain in captivity.
            Light - natural photoperiod; temperature - "room".
            Outdoor duck pens of sizable dimensions may be used for
            holding Egrets.
FOOD        Feed on both vertebrate and invertebrate aquatic
            organisms.
            Ad libitum.

          &  DJSeaSe     Ticks, worms, mites, fleas, lice.
         &  RearillŁ      3 eggs per clutch; 1 clutch per year; young
                         altricial and nidiculous, young fledge at
                         5 weeks of age (183, 222) colonial
                         nesters.

Special Costs

                         Slow breeder, large size, protected by law.
lexicological  Studies
                         Cranes, rails, coots.

Physiological  Parameters

-------
FULICA AMERICANA
             Gray  duck-like bird  (221);   body length - 15"  (1196)
Availability   Found  in  marsh  areas  mainly in the Eastern U.S.  (221)
             Readily  available  for study.
             Light  -  natural  photoperiod;  temperature - ambient.
Cage       Mallard  cage  specifications.
F00IJ        Carnivorous  in wild,  need grit for digestive aid and
             mineral  supplement.
            Ad  libitum

Parasites  & Disease
          & Rearing       Young are precocial and nidifugous,
Special  Costs
                          Protected by legislation
lexicological Studies


Ecological  Alternatives    Herons,  ibis,  ducks.
Physiological Parameters

-------
PHILOHELA MINOR
            A large, husky, neckless, long-billed brown bird;
            lenght of body - 10 to 12" (221).
            Found in swamps, wetlands and thickets throughout most
            of the U.S.
            Migratory and territorial; available; socially tolerant
            of one another; hardy, withstands heat and cold well
            (225).

            Light - natural photoperiod; temperature - "room".
            20 x 40 x 8' field enclosure; 4x4x5' ground cage;
            22 x 29 x 30" steel cage for lab (225).  All cages are
            provided with food and water; they should be covered
            with burlap to prevent flushing and injury to the bird.

            In the lab they feed on earthworms, mealworms, fly lar-
            vae placed in peat moss in food pans at all times; in
            nature, they feed on invertebrates near lakes, ponds
            and streams.
            Ad libitum.
          &
                          Ticks, mites, fleas, lice, worms.
Breeding  & Rearing
        COStS

Restrictions


lexicological  Studies
                          Cages must be kept clean to prevent disease.

                          Nervous and therefore prone to injure  them-
                          selves in captivity.
                          27, 226,  22?,  223,  229, 230
Ecological  Alternatives    snipe.
Physiological  Parameters

-------
 LARUS ARGENTATUS
             Known as common seagull;  body length - 23 to 26" (221)
AV3Jl3bJiJty   Ranges in most of the Eastern half of the U.S.  near the
             coast and along river banks (221).


 Pa of I) roc     Easy to obtain eggs and adult birds;  good subjects for
             short term studies and oological studies because of
             colonial nesting; migratory and diurnal.


 LdDOr3tOry   Light - natural photoperiod;  temperature - "room".
             Cage dimensions used for ducks may be suitable for the
             herring gull.
             Invertebrate and vertebrate aquatic life should be
             supplied  at all  times;  grit should be supplied as a
             digestive aid and mineral supplement (182) .
             Ad  libitum .

 Par3Sit6S  & DiSeaSe  Fleas, mites, ticks, lice.
      ing  & Rearif]Ł   4 eggs per clutch; 1 clutch per year; high re-
                      nesting potential; incubation period - 27 days;
                      young precocial, nidicolous, fledge at 43 days
                      (183,  184,  231).
Special Costs

ReStriCtIORS           Hard to maintain in lab; protected by
                      legislation.

Toxicological Studies i88,  231,  232, 235, 235, 249
Ecological Alternatives  Terns, other guns, Pei
Physiological Parameters
icans.

-------
MELANERPES ERYTHROCEPHALUS
            chisel-billed tree-climbers; stiff, spiny tails;
            8-8 1/2 body length; head completely red  (221) .
            Found throughout U.S. in woodlands (221). .
            Diurnal and migratory; hole-nesters.
            Light - natural photoperiod; temperature -; "room".
 Cage
Bobwhite quail cages with modifications.
 Food
In nature - seeds and terrestrial insects - grit need-
ed in diet to aid in digestion and supplement minerals,
 Water
 Parasites &  Disease
              Hosts of fleas,  mites,  lice.
 Breeding &  Rearing


 Special Costs
 Restrictions
              2 to 3 eggs per clutch;  12 day incubation
              period; young are nidicolous and altricial;
              24 day fledging period.
 lexicological  Studies     233
            Alternatives   Brown creeper, nuthatch
 Physiological  Parameters

-------
FALCO SPARVERIUS
            Small  sparrow-like  falcon;  body  length -  9  to  12";
            long life  spans.
AĄ3liability  Most abundant hawk  found  throughout  North America (241)
 Features
Laboratory
Cage
Food
            Ad libitum
Water
Parasites &  Disease


Breeding &  Rearing


Special Costs
Restrictions
            Available, fairly easy to maintain; good indicators of
            pesticide level in the environment, small and fairly
            easy to handle in comparison with larger raptors.
            Outdoor pen - 8 x 12 x 7' enclosure with roof made of
            1x1 1/2" mesh with box 10 x 10 x 15" with 3" diameter
            opening; larger dimensions  (50 x 20 x 6") can house mul-
            tiple pairs of hawks  (239); alternate cage - 6 x 6x8'
            solid wire cage for a pair of sparrow hawks.

            Dead cockerels, ground beef, vitamins, minerals, and tur-
            key breeder crumbs (239, 240);  a combination of hamsters
            and chicken heads and necks may be substituted for ground
            beef; roughage in diet is needed for formation of fecal
            pellets.
                        Hosts for external  parasites  to  a  limited
                        extent  (182).

                        Sexual maturity - end of  first yr.;  clutch
                        size - 3 to  7, average  4  or 5 eggs;  incuba-
                        tion period  - usually 30  days; fledging per-
                        iod - 30 days; nesting  success - 3.88 young
                        hatched per  nest and 3.81 young  fledged per
                        nest (215, 241).

                        Equipment for handling, fairly expensive diet

                        Violence during handling;  slow reproducer
                        requiring large pens.
lexicological Studies   134, isa,  243,  249
           Alternatives  Kites, shrikes, buteos,  accipiters  and  falco-
Physiological Parameters

-------
TYTO ALBA
            Long-legged, light-colored owl with while, heart-shaped
            face; body length - 15 to 20"; claws and beak modified
            to handle prey  (221) .

AV3II3DUIIJ  Found mainly in the Eastern half of the U.S., particu-
            larly near barns and old buildings (221) .  .
            Fairly good availability; fairly easy to maintain; good
            indicator of pesticide levels in environment; nocturnal,
L3BOr 3tOry   Light  - natural photoperiod; temperature - "room".
             6 x  10 x  50' chicken wire and wood frame cage with por-
             ches and  nest box  for one breeding pair (20) .
             Carnivorus 'habits  in nature and in lab; small whole rod-
             ents  -  especially  while brooding  (20) ;  roughage  needed
             for fecal pellet formation.


             Ad libitum
Parasites  & Disease
Breeding  & Rearing     5 to  1]- e^s ?er clutch
Special Costs
                        Hard  to  tame and breed  in  captivity;  capable
                        of causing injury to handler.
lexicological Studies  245, 243
           Alternatives  Kites,  shrikes, buteos,  accipiters  and falcons,

Physiological  Parameters

-------
 COLUMBA LIVIA
Cage
            Domesticated bird; body  length  about  13",  weight  -  about
            450g. ; sexual monomorphic  (221,  1196)  .
            Common throughout U.S.  in association with man;  captured
            with traps or mist nets; can be  raised  in  captivity or
            obtained commercially.
Large enough for good samples; can be breed easily  in
captivity; easily housed and caged; good temper ment,
can be conditioned and trained  (182, 267,  272).

Light - 14L:10D photoperiod; temperature - 20°+1°C  (251)i.


20 x 29 x 18cm steel rat cage houses one bird   (250)
40 x 64 x 40cm cage houses one bird  (251)  ; 45.7cm  cage;
made of 7.3 x 2.5cm gage welded wire with  perch,  food caa
automatic watering device and nest box should house a pai
(252)   115 x 134 x 229cm cage houses a pair of birds  (253
rfi  j        Commercial pellet diet or a mixture of wheat, maize, and
'000        tick beans (251);  grit should'be available  to  birds at
            all times (182);  eats seed and  grain in  the wild.      ;


            Ad libitum .                                             |
Parasites  & Disease
                        Breeding season - all year;  clutch size -
Breeding  & Rearing     2 e^s> laying interval between  eggs  -  1.5 tc
       6          6     2 days; incubation period  -  15 days;  fledgin?
                        period - 17 days; fertility  - 83.3  to 92.9%
                        eggs; (215, 252).
Special Costs
ReStriCtiORS             Protected by legislation in  some areas.

T   -  ,   •  ,  Pl  ..     152, 199, 252. 255, 259, 260, 261,  262,  263,
lexicological  studies   264, 266, 267; 268, 259, 270, 271,  272,  273,
                        885, 1134


Ecological Alternatives  Rin9 dove' mourning dove.
Physiological  Parameters

-------
COLINUS VIRGINIANUS
            Chicken-like bird; body length 8.5 - 10.5".
Availability
            Eastern Farmlands from  Gulf  of Mexico  to  Ontario
            Breeds well in captivity; requires minimal housing space;
            readily available and easy to maintain.
            Light - natural photoperiod; temperature - "room".
i 000
Water
            6 x 10 x 8" cage constructed of 1" wire mesh;
            4 x 6 x 1.5" pen designed for a large number of birds;
            3x6" outdoor pens made of wire net (276).


            F & M game bird chow, turkey starter mash, Purina
            pigeon chow  (274, 277,  278);  grit needed to aid di-
            gestion and to supply dietary minerals (182) .
            Ad libitum.
          &  Disease
                         Fleas, mites, ticks and lice.
                          25  day  incubation period; young are
                          precocial and  nidfugous.
 Special  Costs
lexicological  Studies
                         Cannibalism in crowded quarters;  protected
                         by legislation.
                         202, 274, 275, 275, 273, 279, 28.0, 231,  28.2,
                         283, 284, 285, 286
           Alternatives   Cotumix, pheasant, grouse.
Physiological Parameters

-------
PHASIANUS COLCHICUS
             Large gallinaceous bird with long pointed tail; body
             length - male, 33-36"; female - 20 1/2"  (221).
Availability  Found in farming country north of Mason-Dixon line.
             Breeds easily in captivity; easily maintained; migra-
             tory and diurnal.
             Light - normal photoperiod; temperature -  "room".
             Pen complex 22 x 6.1 x 1.7m. can be partitioned  into
             27 individual cages with dirt runways and plywood
             shelters  (287).


p00d         Diet recommended in Poultry Formula guide  (288) ;  grit
             needed (182) .
             Ad libitum
Parasites &  Disease     Ticks, iice, mites,
         &  Rearing      Precocial and nidifugous young.
Special Costs
                         Cannabalistic in crowded quarters; protect-
                         ed by law.

lexicological Studies    2i°/ 248' 281, 232, 290, 291, 293, 294, 295
                         296, 297, 298, 299, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304
                         305, 306, 734, 735, 1197, 1198

Ecological  Alternatives   Grouse, turkey.
Physiological Parameters

-------
DENDRAGAPUS OBSCURUS
            Plump-breasted, short-winged birds approximately 17-21"
            long (1196).
nV3!l3ulllty Lives in coniferous forests of humid Pacific coast and
            mountains (1196) .
            Easy to maintain and breed in captivity; useful in field
            and lab telemetric studies due to large size.
            Light - natural photoperiod; temperature -"room1 .
Cage
Food
            24.5 x 2.5 x 3.25'  concrete  tank with wire  mesh top;
            20 x 10 x 6'  pen made  of fish  netting and steel posts;
            8.1 x 16.2'  pen  with turf floors and  mesh roof;
            1x1x2' wire  cage used for  the  field.

            Game bird chow in pellet form  (308);   grit  needed as  a
            digestive aid and mineral supplement   (182).
Water
            Ad libitum.
          &
                         Ticks, mites, fleas, worms.
Breeding &  Rearing
                         Sexual maturity reached in 112 days (309)
                         young are nidifugous and precocial (183).
Special Costs
Restrictions
                         Cannabalistic  in crowded quarters; protected
                         by legislation.
lexicological  Studies    312,  313
           Alternatives   Coturnix, bobwhite quail, pheasant.
Physiological  Parameters

-------
MELOSPIZA MELODIA
            Sparrow; length - 5 to  6  3/4";  short,  stout bill  used for;
            seed cracking; longevity  of approximately  2 years (221). "
AV3ll3Dllliy Found throughout most of the U.S.  in woods  and  non-
            aquatic areas   (221) .


F62tlireS    Readily available in the wild.
L3BOr3tOry  Light - natural photoperiod;  temperature  -"room".
 fnnij
            120 x 60 x 60cm cage made of wood and  12mm mesh;  single j
            bird cage of 41 x 61 x 38cm; 3x3x2'  cages  and
            6x5x2' cages used .

            Lab food - pigeon chow, canary or millet seed,  or a  mix-
            ture of biscuit meal, dried milk, soya bean meal  and maw
            seed; Natural food - seeds; cuttle bone  necessary for
            beak trimming purposes, and grit should  be provided  as a
            digestive aid and mineral supplement.

            Should be available at all times.

          &  DiSeaSe      Lice, flies, mites and ticks.
RrPPfiino  Ł DP or in a
Dl CCUlllg  ft ncdllilg
Special Costs
lexicological Studies
                          Usually four nestings a  season;  2  to  5 egg'
                          Per nesting; incubation  period of  12  to 13
                          dayg. young leave nest after  9 to  11  days;
                          young fledged after  45 days;  difficult to
                          breed in captivity.
                          Highly territorial and migratory;  hard to
                          breed in captivity;  subject  to  parasitism.
                          2?s
Ecological  Alternatives
Physiological  Parameters
                          Blackbirds.

-------
RICHMONDENA CARDINALIS
              Solid red-crested bird about 8 to 9 inches long (221).
              life span of 3 to 6 yrs. in nature (321).
AV3Jl3bilitY    Found in U.S. east of plains near towns, farms, roads,
          *    swamps, etc. (221).
Features
Readily available; one of the best "model" granivores.
              Light-natural photoperiod; temperature-room,
Cage
Food
Water
Parasites &  Disease
120x60x60cm wood and 12 mm mesh cage (317);  3x3x2" to
6x5x2' cages have been used with enclosed nest box (318);
61x41x38cm cage has been used for single bird (319) .


Pigeon chow  (275) canary or millet seed (319);
bisquit meal, dried milk, soya bean meal, maw seed
(319);   cuttle bone needed for beak trimming and grit
needed also  (182,  319).
Ad libitum .
                        Lice, fleas, mites, and ticks (321).
Breeding &  Rearing


Special Costs
Restrictions

Toxicological  Studies
          Cardinals become sexually mature at one year;
          2 to 5 eggs per clutch; 4 to 5 clutches per
          year (241);   12 to 13 day incubation; fledging
          period is 45 days  (288).
          Highly territorial and protected by legis»
          lation; does not adapt well to lab.
Ecological  Alternatives  Blackbirds,
Physiological  Parameters

-------
 TURDUS  MIGRATORIUS
             Long-legged,  short-billed bird; body length - 8.5 - 10.5"
             (221) ;   longevity in wild - 1 to 3 years; longevity in  I
             captivity - 12 years.
Availability  Found throughout United States  (221).
 P63tlir6S     Song bird;  monogamous mating; migratory and diurnal.
             Light - 15L:9D photoperiod; temerature - 70° to 80°F.
jjapg        9 x 12 x 7'  communal cage for 20-70 birds;
   8          20 x 15 x 22" cage for 10 birds;
             9.75 x 7.0 x 8.0" metabolism cage for one bird.


Food        Beetles, true bugs, spiders, caterpillars, ants, small
             hymenoptera are major food items; grasshoppers, crickets,
             craneflies,  moths, millipedes and snails are minor food!


Water       Should be available at all times.

           & UlSeaSe     Hosts for mites and ticks.
Rroeriino  Ł Dearino      3 to 4 eggs per clutch; usually 3 clutches pf
DICeUlllg  ft nCdllllfc      year  (241);  !3 to 16 day incubation period;
                         young are altricial and nidicolus; fledging
                         takes 13 days on the average.

Special Costs

ReStriCtlOIIS              Territorial, hard to breed and maintain in
                         lab; protected by legislation.
Toxicologicai Studies
37, 326, 333, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338
           Alternatives   Vireos,  warblers,  goatsuckers.
Physiological  Parameters

-------
STURNUS VULGARIS
             Similar in shape to a Meadowlark;  7 1/2-8  1/2" body
             length (221).
             Common resident species throughout continental U.S.;
             readily captured in Japanese mist nets.
Features
Laboratory
Mean annual adult mortality in wild, 51-58% (344) ;
largely insectivorous in the wild; not protected
by law.

Temperature -"room", 70°-80°F (329);  light-natural
photoperiod-
Cage
Food
Outdoor individual holding cages 2x1x1";  (342)
Metabolism cages 9 3/4x7x7" (329).
            Chick mash, ad libitum (329)
  i -i i.   Pr,Qtfiin  Fiber  Fat  NFE  Ash
pellets:  23.9?    5.6%  3.4  57.2 10%
mealworms:50.4%    4.9  34.9   6.7 3.2%
Ad libitum  (329).
                                                 % highly
                                  ib, consumption digestable
                                       (g)/day)     3.4%
                                 6gm
                                                               85%
Hater
Parasites &  Disease
Breeding &  Rearing

Special Costs
Restrictions
          Young altricial (344)  ;first clutch  5.5*0.9,
          second clutch 4.1-0.96 (344);   Incubation  -
          12 days  (344) ;Fledging - 21st day after
          hatching (344).
          Highly territorial; require separate cages
          for each breeding pair  (182).
              ^tnriioc   Used in nationwide monitoring of levels of
              31UUIB5   certain pesticides and pollutants (342, 347,
                       739,  740).
           Alternatives Red~win
-------
 PASSER DOMESTICUS
             5 to 6 1/4" body length (221);  life expectancy - 3
             years with exceptions up to 12 years (331) .
Availability  Found in great numbers around cities, towns, and
             farms in the U.S. and Canada (221).
             Familiar bird, distributed where man lives.
             Light - natural photoperiod; temperature - "room".
n
w«gB
rOOu
             7x7x7' cage - 50 to 100 birds for 4 to 6 weeks;
             2x2x2' cage - 7 to 10 birds for 3 days; 6x9x6'
             cage - individual test cage; all cages made of 1" mesh
             poultry netting.

             Pigeon chow checkers and chick starter mash; grit needs
             as a digestive aid and mineral supplement.
             Ad libitum
          &  Disease
                           Lice, flies, mites and ticks; serves as
                           a carrier of encephalitis.
      ing &  Rearing
Special Costs
                           3 to 6 eggs per clutch; ll day incubatiott
                           period, 14 day fledging period; 2 to 4
                           clutches per breeding season.
                           Birds are highly territorial and require
                           separate cages for each breeding pair.
lexicological  Studies
                           210,  275,  335, 339, 3*2
Ecological  Alternatives
Physiological  Parameters

-------
CALLUS CALLUS
            Tlie common domestic chicken.
nY3ll3Dlllty  Can be obtained in large numbers from commercial breeders
            in any part of the country.
            Large yet easily handled; easily obtainable; continuous
            nesters; can be housed in limited space and cheaply.
            Light - 14L:10D photoperiod; temperature - 23.9°C;
            Humidity - 45 to 78% depending on age of bird.
Cage
 Food
            30 x 20x 8" cage for 10  to  20  chicks;  15  x  10  x 8"
            experimental cage for 10 to 50 chicks;  individual and
            brooder units with shavings, peat moss or commercial
            litter are available commercially.

            Commercial chow - ad libitum;  grit  needed for  mineral
            requirements.
            Ad libitum.
Water
Parasites &  Disease
                         Newcastle disease, bronchitus, fowl pox,
                         coccidiosis, other parasites common.
 Breeding  & Rearing


 Special  Costs
 Restrictions
                         Sexual  maturity  -  20  to  22  weeks;  continuous
                         laying  throughout  most of year;  incubation
                         period  -  21  to 23  days.
                         Cannabalistic  tendencies.
 lexicological Studies
                         350,  355,  356,  358,  359,  360,  361, 362, 363, 365,
                         366,  367,  368,  369,  370,  371,  372, 373, 374, 375,
                         376,  377,  466,  619,  1199
 Ecological Alternatives   Jungle fowl, wild turkey.

              Parameters  Spontaneous motility in chick embryos  (1200);
                          heart rate of chick embryo (357);   monitoring
                          system for cardiac and gross motor activity
                          (378).

-------
COTURNIX COTURNIX
            Small quail; weight - male, llOg.  (90-120g.)/  female
            130g. (110-150g.)  (383).
Availability Exotic species; easy to breed in laboratories.
            6 week reproductive cycle; cheap to breed and raise  in
            laboratory; small for easy handling in  lab yet  large
            enough for good sample  (406);  representative of upland
            game birds (199, 406).
LabOr 3tOry  Light - 14L:10D photoperiod; relative humidity -  60 to
            70%.
Cage
Food
3 x 6 x 1.5' with 1/2" mesh breeder cage  for  5 males and
15 females  (379); 12 x 12 x 7" cage by GOF Mfg. Co., P.Oi
8152, Savannah, GA 31400, recommended for breeding.

Seeds, commercial game bird chow.
WatBf      Ad libitum.
Parasites &  Disease
Breeding  & Rearing


Special Costs
Restrictions

Toxicological Studies
            Sexual maturity - 6 weeks; recommended  sexual
            ratio- 1 cock:3 hens, 2 cocks:7 hens; laying
            schedule - continuous all year approximately
            200 to 300 laid per year with artificial H$
            source; incubation time and temperature - 16
            days±8 hours at about 100°F; Fertility  - 90%
            after 50 days (379); up to 4 generations per
            year.


            Migrating restlessness observed in April and
            September under natural conditions.

            L99,  249,  255, 293, 326, 371, 380, 382, 384,
            385,  386,  389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395,
            396,  397,  398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404,
            406
Ecological  Alternatives  eobwhite
Physiological  Parameters

-------
MELOPSITTACUS  UNDULATUS


DeSCriptiOl) Small, slender bird; about 4 - 6"long,
Availability  Native to tropical Australia; coiruucrcially available at
            pet stores and distributors.
            Easy to breed and maintain in the laboratory.
            Light - natural photoperiod; temperature - "room".
Gage       Standard breeding cages, nest boxes and bowls are avail-
            able commercially.



lOOu       Commerical chows; sunflower seeds supplement diet; iodine
            necessary in diet; tree branches necessary for bill trim-
            ming purposes.


KKater      M libitum.

           & DJSeaSE     Fleas, ticks, lice and mites.
          & Rp/milO      Sexually mature at 6 months; will breed all
          « neamig      year round. 3 to 4 eggs per clutch, can have
                         as many as 6 eggs per clutch; 18 to 23 day
                         incubation period; fledged at 6 to 9 weeks.

 Special  Costs

                         Very noisy, sanitation problems common.
lexicological Studies


Ecological Alternatives   parrot.
Physiological Parameters

-------
BLARINA BREVICAUDA
             large shrew, head and body 3-4 inches; adult females
             16.5 g, males 18. g  (416) life expectancy: 20 months
             (414).

Availability   common in eastern U.S.A.; pit traps;  some  dealers.
Features

Laboratory:


Cage

Food

Water
Parasites &
Food and water must  be  constantly  available.   Active
day and night.   Individual  variation  to  temperment.
Odor may be problem.  Possess  poison  glands  (saliva).

Light - ?; Temperature  -  "room1; Realtive  humidity -
?  +70%; Air quality -  watch amnonia  and musk  levels;
Sound - may be sensitive.

Density - 1, more with  care; Size  - variable;  don't
jump, do dig; Material  - variable, will  climb  screen;
Nest - provide container and lining or_ allow soil cham-
ber and provide  lining; Bedding -  sphagnum or  soil,
3-6 inches deep; Sanitation -  ?; Furniture - ?.

Ground horse or  beef; canned dog food; earthworms; mice;
mealworms.  CAUTION:  Very  sensitive  to  food shortages.
Feed ad libitum.

CAUTION:  Sensitive  to  water shortages.  Water ad  libitui

UISedSe Sensitive to exposure, especially  getting  fur
        wet.  Mites.                                    i
Breeding &  Rearing


Special Costs
Restrictions
        Sexual maturity  at  1-2  months.   Gestation about l
        21 days.   Pcst-partum estrous  - (?);  Litter size
        5-7; Litter  number  2, possible  3 per  year.   Sea-
        son - peak in April.  Weaned -  about  22  days.
        Initial trapping program and transport,  or
        Consume less than 1/2 body weight in  food/day.

        Difficult  to maintain in lab.
lexicological Studies
Ecological  Alternatives
Physiological  Parameters
             Cryptotis
              906
Sorex cinereus

-------
EPTESICUS FUSCUS
             Large bat, head and body 3" to 4" forearm 1" to 2";
             weight 10 to 16 g; life expectancy unknown.



AVail3ullity  Available locally throughout U.S.; collected with
             mist nets •
             Nocturnal; usually solitary, sometimes colonial.
laboratory   Light - 13L:11D photoperiod; temperature, 21 to 28°C;
             relative humidity, 55-92%.



tage        Density - 5 to 10 per cage; size is variable,
             20 x 20 x 25 cm to 80 x 92 x 138 cm with roosting
             box 80 x 92 x 57 cm;  material - wood, hardware cloth
             (bats hang from hardware cloth ceiling).

FOOd        Young birds, mealworms and other insects, high
             vitamin-protein mixtures-



Water       Ad_ libitum.

Parasites & Disease   Mites,
Breeding  & Rearing    Sexual maturity- 1 year; gestation - unknown
                       (delayed implantation);  post-partum estrous -
                       no; litter size-usually two; litter number-
                       one per year; season - May through June

Special COStS          Initial supply .

Restrictions            Breedablllty in captivity unknown.



lexicological Studies  438
           Alternatives     Other insectivorous bats.

Physiological Parameters

-------
         SYLVILAGUS FLORIDANUS
         (S. AUDUBONI)
Description
 Availability
 Features
Cottontail rabbit; head and body 12 to 17"; tail
1 to 2"; weight, 1.5 to 4 Ibs; life expectancy -
over 2 yrs.


Abundant throughout brush, grasslands in Eastern
and Southern U. S. (deserts and foothills in South-
western U. S. ).


Active day and night, game animal.
               Light-"natural photoperiod"; temperature-"room";
               relative humidity - over 50%.
 Cage
 Food
Density - over 4; Size - variable  (minimum 1 sq.
ft. per animal); Material - wood, plastic, metal,
fiberglass.
               Green vegatation, commercial rabbit diet.
 Water
 Parasites & Disease
               Ad libitum.
                          Tularemia.
 Breeding &  Rearing


 Special  Costs
 Restrictions
           Sexual maturity - about 1 yr.; Gestation
           26 to 30 days; Postpartumestrous - ?;
           Litter size - 2 to 7; Litter number - 2
           to 4 per year; Season - spring to fall.

           Initial supply.
 lexicological  Studies
 Ecological Alternatives   Hares, voies.
 Physiological Parameters

-------
DIPODOMYS ORDI
             Large kangaroo rat, head and body 4" to 5"; weight,
             43 to 70g; light-colored desert rodent with large
             head and long tail, 5" to 6"; front legs weak, sal-
             tatorial; fur-lined cheekpouches (412).

nVdlldDllliy  Common in sandy soils throughout western plains and
             deserts of U.S.; some dealers.
Features


Laboratory


Cage

Food


Water
Parasites &  Disease


Breeding &  Rearing


Special Costs
Restrictions

lexicological  Studies
             Nocturnal, active throughout year, stores seeds,
             burrows, temperament varies individually, often
             docile and easy to handle.


             Light- 12L-.12D; temperature- 24 to 28°C; relative
             humidity-- very low (as in natural environment).

             Density- 1, but depends on cage size; size- variable,
             10 xll x!6" to 2 x2 x3'; breeding cage- 5'x7'x2f;
             must be covered; material - variable, glass or metal
             (will gnaw wood); nest- mailing tube, small boxes;
             bedding, dried leaves, grass; substrate- dried leaves;
             sand important for cleaning pelage.

             Cereals, ground meat meal,  various seeds; greens may
             be important nutritionally and for proper breeding.

             Water requirements negligible though may increase
             if kangaroo rats become accustomed to drinking.
                       Sexual maturity  90 days; gestation- 29 to
                       32 days; post-partum estrous, unknown; lit-
                       ter size- 2 to 5; litter number-  1  to  2 per
                       year; season, May through June and late
                       summer - weaned 20 to 25 days.

                       Initial trapping program and transport;
                       supply.

                       Heteromyid rodents are very territorial;
                       colonial breeding may be a problem.
Ecological  Alternatives
Physiological  Parameters
                                   s sp.;  Perognathus hispidus;
                                    us  flavus .
                           454,  45?

-------
NEOTOMA LEPIDA
             Desert wood rat, head and body  6" to 7", tail, hairy,
             4.5" to 6.5"; weight, 100-17 Og. ;  life  expectancy -  5 yea
             Locally common on  southwestern deserts  and  rocky
             slopes, some dealers-
             Generally nocturnal
             Light  -  normal  photoperiod;  temperature - 23°C+;  relati\
             humidity -  60 to  70%.
             Density - depends on cage  size;  size  -  variable;  materia
             metal, glass, wire mesh; nest  -  cotton,  grass,  etc.
             Seeds,  fruits,  acorns,  cactus,  food scraps
              Ad libitum.
Parasites  & Disease
                      Sexual maturity - 60 days;  gestation - 30 to 36
                      days;  post-partum estrous - unknown; litter   }
                      size - 1 to 5 (avg.  3); litter frequency - ovei
                      4  per  year; season' - warm months; weaned - 15 di

         lOStS         Initial acquisition of breeding stock.         ;

Restrictions


lexicological Studies
Ecological  Alternatives    other
Physiological  Parameters

-------
ORYZOMYS PALUSTRIS
              small rat; head and body 4.5" to 5.5", tail 4.5" to 7";
              weight 40 to 75g.; life expectancy - unknown.
              Common in marshlands in Southeastern U. S.
fCatUreS      Nocturnal, semiaquatic.
              Light- natural photoperiod; temperature- "room";
              relative humidity- unknown.
Cage          Density- depends on cage size; size variable-
              27x17x14" to 3'x8'xl5" cage with smaller compartments;
              material- wire mesh.


Food          Green vegetation, seeds, dog food.
Water        Ad libitum.

Parasites  & Disease
          Ł Peering  Sexual maturity - 50 days; gestation - 25 days;
                  »  post-partum estrous - unknown; litter size -
                     1 to 7  (avg. 3.5); litter frequency - 3 to 5 per
                     year; season - warm months; weaned at 13 days.

Special  COStS        initial trapping program.

Restrictions
lexicological Studies
           Alternatives   Any small herbivore
Physiological Parameters

-------
SPERMOPHILUS BEECHEYI
DeSCriptiO(l  Large ground squirrel, head and body 9" to 11";
             tail 1.25" to 2.5"; weight 45-70 g.; life expectancy-
             unknown-

Availability  Locally abundant along Pacific coast.
             Diurnal burrowing rodent, openland inhabitant.
Laboratory
Cage
Food
Light-normal photoperiod; temperature-"room";
relative humidity-over 50%.

Density-depends on cage size; size-variable, 12 ft.   ;
packing crates with wire mesh, 4 to 10 ft  metal sus-
pension cages; material-metal, wire mesh  (wood not    '
suitable); nest-boxes; bedding-cotton; substrate-
burlap sacks, wood shavings; furniture-exercise wheels;
sanitation-daily; breeding cage-4x8x2' of 1/2" wire mesh
nest box, 12x12x12".
Seeds, greens, fresh vegetables, dog food, raw meat,
lab chows-

Ad libitum.
Water
Parasites  & Disease     Mites.
Breeding  & Rearing

Special Costs
Restrictions
            Sexual maturity-1 year; gestation-25 to
            30 days; post-partum estrous-unknown;
            litter size-4 to 15 (avg. 7); litter
            frequency-1 year; season-usually March to
            April; weaned-35 to 40 days.

            Initial trapping program.

            Possible social problems in colonies •
lexicological Studies
           Alternatives   Other ground squirrels, Eutamias
Physiological Parameters  1149,  1149

-------
EUTAMIAS MINIMUS
             Small chipmunk, head and body 3.5" to 4.5"; tail, bushy,
             3" to 4.5"; weight, 30-60g.; life expectancy-5 to 8 years.
             Common throughout various habitats of west central
             lowlands and upland U.S. and across most of Canada.
             Diurnal; very active, alert, agile; climbs readily;
             lives in burrows; stores seeds.
 lahnrotnrw   Light-normal photoperiod; temperature-"room"; relative
 LdBQIdlUry   humidity-over 25%.

             Density-pair or more; size-variable, 2'x2'x2' must be
             covered; material-glass, metal, wood .may be unsatisfactory;
 Cage        nest-small box, mailing tube; bedding-dried leaves,
             c^iall twigs, grass; substrate-soil paper, wire mesh;
             furniture-exercise wheel.

 Cftfld        Fruits, nuts, seeds insects, greens, chopped raw
   uu        meats, cod liver oil.
              Ad libitum.
 Parasites  & Disease
 Breeding  & Rearing    Sexual maturity-1 year; gestation-3t) days;
                       post-partum estrous-no; litter size-2 to  6;
                       litter number-1 per year; season-late spring;
                       weaned-25 days.

 Special Costs

 Restrictions           Poor previous success at breeding in captivity.
 lexicological Studies
           Alternatives Tamias striatus;_Spermophilus sp.; Peromyscus sp.

Physiological Parameters

-------
TAMIAS  STRIATUS
Description
 Availability
               Woodland terrestrial  squirrel; head and body  5" to
               6"; tail bushy, 3" to 4"; weight, 65 to 130g.; life
               expectancy-8 years.


               Locally common throughout deciduous forests of
               eastern North America.
 Features
               Diurnal, quick, alert, hibernates in winter.
Laboratory
Cage
Food
               Light-500 to 2400 lux; temperature-20° to 25°C;
               relative humidity-70% .


               Density-1, possible more; size-2x2x2'; material-
               glass, metal, wire mesh; nest-box, flower post,
               mailing tube; bedding-cotton, grass dried leaves;
               furniture-exercise wheel, climbing poles.

               Seeds, corns, fruits, insects.
               Ad libitum.
Water         	
Parasites  &  Disease
Breeding & Rearing


Special Costs
Restrictions
                       Sexual maturity-6 months to  1 year; gestation-
                       31 days; post-partum estrous-no;  litter
                       size-2 to 8  (avg. 4.5); litter  frequency-
                       2 per year;  season-April and August.

                       Initial trapping or supply.

                       Unsociable habits may cause  difficulty in
                       group cages.
lexicological  Studies
Ecological  Alternatives
Physiological  Parameters
                            squirrels.

-------
 MICROTUS PENNSYLVANICUS
Availability
 Features
              Meadow vole;  head and body 3.5"  to 5";  tail  1.5" to
              2.5";  weight  30 to 70g.;  life  expectancy-unknown.
Abundant in low moist areas, grasslands of all
types, orchards, etc. across northern U. S.
and Canada.
Active day or night.
 Laboratory
Light-natural photoperiod;  temperature-"room" ;
relative humidity-over 10%.
 Cage
 Food
Density-depends on cage size; size-12x8x5" for breeding
pair, 6x25x2' with 48 2x3x6" nest boxes; material-
wire mesh, metal, plastic, fiberglass; nest-box 2x3x6";
bedding-cotton, fine grass; substrate-peat moss, sand
wood shavings, corn husks; furniture-exercise wheel

Grasses, seeds, bark; greens may cause diarrhea.
 Water        ^ libitum.
 Parasites &  Disease  Mites'  fleas-
 Breeding &  Rearing


 Special Costs
 Restrictiois
         Sexual ma'turity-40 to 50 days; gestation-
         21 days; post-partum estrous-yes; litter size-
         1 to 9  (avg. 3 to 5); litter frequency-
         monthly; weaning-21 days .
         Initial supply-
 lexicological  Studies
 Ecological  Alternatives  other voles*
 Physiological  Parameters

-------
PEROMYSCUS MANICULATUS
             Typical mouse, brown to gray back and sides, white under
             parts; head and body 3" to 4"; tail 2" to 5"; weight
             19 to 35g.;  life expectancy-5 to 8 years.

Availability  Common to abundant throughout the U. S. except the
             Southwest; numerous dealers.
             Primarily nocturnal, some diurnal activity;
             limited climbing.
Laboratory
Cafe
Food
             Light-unknown;  temperature-"room";  relative
             humidity-over 10%.


             Density-dependent on cage size;  size-variable, 9x7x5",
             or 15x14x12"; material-wire mesh, wood, metal; nest-
             fruit jar on its side;  bedding-cotton,  dried leaves;
             substrate-woodchips, sand; furniture-exercise wheel.

             Commercial diets available, lettuce, rolled oats,
             meat scraps, seeds, fruit.
Water
          &
             Ad libitum
                       Mites, ticks, fleas, nematodes.
Breeding  & Rearing


Special Costs
Restriction
                      Sexual maturity-60 days; -gestation-25 days;
                      post-partum estrous-yes; litter size-3 to
                      6;  litter frequency-5 to 9 per year; season-
                      year round; weaned-25 days.


                      Initial supply.
lexicological Studies 167> 348'  see, si?
           Alternatives
Physiological  Parameters
                            sma11 ominovorous rodent,

-------
MUSTEIA VISON
Description
             Carnivorous mammal with  long slender bodies  and  short
             legs;  usually dark brown with white throat patch;  total
             length 20" to 25"  (Male)  (1201);  17" to  20"  (Female);
             weight-1-1/2 to  3 Ibs.  (Male);  1-1/4 to  2-2/5  Ibs.  (Fe-
             male) ; life expectancy-3 years-
Availability   Available from pelt  industry  farming;  numerous  mink
             ranches  in U.S.  raising  5000  or more  aniiaals  per year
             (1202);  have  been  trapped by  professional  trappers; range
             entire N.  American continent  except southeastern U.S.

             Aggressive; chiefly  nocturnal; at  home on  land  or in
             water; usually lives in  banks of stream or lake or under
             tree stumps or logs;  usually  solitary.

             Light-natural photoperiod;  temperature-"room" ;
             relative humidity-unknown-
 Laboratory
Cage
             Density-l;  observation  cage-40x60x40cm.
 Food
             Cotton rats;  raw meat; mice;  fish;  muskrat;  frogs;
             special mink  food when sold  commercially
             mixed diet of horsemeat,  bonefish,  ocean  fish,  liver
             and cereal.
              Ad libitum.
           Ł Hicaaco
           6 UlSCdSe
          & Rearing
 Special  Costs
 Restrictions
                      Aleutian disease  (viral  disease causing lesions);
                      Chediak-Higashi syndrome,  leucodystrophy,
                      hemivertebrae, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome,
                      encephalopathy

                      Sexual maturity-1 year;  gestation-40 to 75
                      days;  litter size-2  to 10  per year;  litter
                      frequency-2  per year;  season-March to April.

                      Initial supply.

                      Very  nervous;  can be vicious, will fight
                      cage-mates•
lexicological Studies 579
Ecological Alternatives
Physiological Paraaeters
                          Other Mustelidae..

-------
MYOCASTOR COYPUS
             Muskrat-like;  head  and  body  22  to 25";  tail  12"  to 17";
             weight 15 to 20 Ib.;  hind feet  webbed;  life
             expectancy - 12 years -


Availability  Locally abundant in southern Mississippi River Valley,
          *  Texas.
             Nocturnal,  feeder  on aquatic  plants,  burrows in banks.
             Light- natural photoperiod;  temperature- about 70 F;
             relative humidity- over 50%,
 CaŁ6        Density - 2;  size - variable (3x2x1');  material -
             metal,  hardware cloth;  nest (for breeding)
             20x2Ocm;  bedding - straw;  substrate - sawdust.

             Sugarbeets, carrots, cabbage,  grass,  bread,  cereals
             Ad libitum.

           & Disease   Salmonella,  tuberculosis,  tularaemia,  ticks,
                       fleas (550).


          0 .,    .     Sexual maturity - 5 to 9 months; gestation -
          & Rearing   avg. 128 days; post-partum estrous - yes;
                      litter size - 2 to 11; litter number - over
                      2 per yr . ; season - year round ; weaned -
                      24 hours.
         LOStS          initial  supply,  metal cages
                       Metal  cages only;  ponds for swimming may be
                       necessary.
lexicological Studies
Ecological Alternatives    voies,
Physiological Parameters

-------
MUSTELA PUTORIU5
Description
Maitabitity
     Carnivore;  head and  body  about  20", tail about  10",
     bushy;  weight 400-3,500g;  life  expectancy - 3 to over
     5 years.


     Suppliers.
Features
     Domestic form,  long fur,  easily  handled  in  lab.
Laboratory
     Light - natural photoperiod;  temperature- 10° to 30°C
Gage
Food
     Density - dependent on cage size; size - variable
     (60cm2 for 3 females or 2 males; material - wood
     metal, concrete; bedding - wood shavings.

     Meat, bread,  milk,  commercial diets.
&
                Ad libitum.
                      Pneumonia, gastric ulcers, virae, bacteria,
                      mites, ticks -
Breeding  & Rearing


Special Costs
Restrictions
            Sexual maturity  -  4  to  5 mos.;  gestation - 51
            to  43 days; post-partum estrous -  unknown; litter
            size - 3  to 15;  litter  number - 2  per  yr.;
            season -  spring  to July, August.


            Initial  supply.
lexicological Studies
Ecological Alternatives    weasels
Physiological Paraaeters  565

-------
      VULPES VULPES
              Red fox; head and body 22-25"; tail 14-16", wt. 30-

              80 Ib.
Availability    Most of U. S., fur ranchers.
              Doglike animal, reddish fur; bushy tail, active day

              and night.
              Light-natural photoperiod; Temperature - "room";
              Relative humidity - 50%.
 Cage         Density-variable; size-large enough for exercise;
              Material-wood, metal, wire mesh; Nest-dog house;
              Bedding-straw.



 rOOd         Fish, cooked cereals, berries, dog food.
 Water         Ad libitum .

 Parasites  & Disease    Ticks, fleas/ rables.



 Breeding &  Rearing     Sexual maturity - 1 yr.; Gestation - about
                        51 days; Postpartumestrous - No; Litter size
                        4 to 9: Litter number - 1/yr. Season - March
                        to April.

 Special  Costs

 Restrictions



 Toxicological  Studies   560




 Ecological  Alternatives coyotes.

 Physiological  Parameters

-------
CANIS FAMILIARIS
              Domestic dog; head and body 12 to 45"; tail 5 to 25",
              life span - to 15 years.
nTalldUIIll)   DOg pounds, breeders, supply houses.
 Features
Docile, domestic.
 Laboratory    Light-"natural photoperiod"; temperature-"room" ,
              relative humidity-60-80%.
Cage
 Food
Density 1 to 5; size-depends on size (from Ito3 sq. ft.
per individual); material-wood, metal, concrete;
bedding-shavings, rugs; furniture-nest box for mothers.


Commercial dog food.
 Water
Ad libitum .
                         Ticks, fleas, tapeworms, heartworms
 Breeding  & Rearing


 Special Costs
 Restrictiois
           Sexual maturity 1 yr.; gestation-9 wks.;
           post partem estrous-no; litter size-3 to 10;
           litter number-1 to 2 per year; weaned-about
           28 days •
           Purebred animals are expensive.
lexicological Studies    822
Ecological Alternatives   Domestic cats.
Physiological Parameters

-------
 SUS SCROFA - miniature swine
             Small pig; weight - 100 to 200 pounds (1203).
             Through Sinclair Comparative Research Farm, Univer-
             sity of Missouri, Columbia, MO  65201; $70-$100 per
             animal.
             Breeds and maintains fairly easily in lab; good
             "model" animal; economically important  (1203) ;
             veteran test animal.
             Light - natural photoperiod; temperature - "room"
             8 x 12" fenced-in holding pens, 3 to 4 sq. ft. per
CaPB         animal; 6 animals per cage(1203);  experiment enclo-
             sure 2 x 3.5'  (1203).

             Various mixtures of cornstarch, sugar, soybean meal,
FOOd         corn ground shell, meat and bone meal, alfalfa meal,
             wheat shorts, dical phosphate, limestone, salt, vita-
             min premix once a day  (1204);
             Should be available at all times

Parasites &  Disease
      ing &  Rearing      114 day gestation period; 3 litters per
                         year.
Special COStS            Cage cleaning.
Restrictions

Toxicological Studies     612
Ecological  Alternatives   °°9' other Pigs<
Physiological  Paraneters

-------
 OVIS  - domestic  sheep
              Domestic ungulate wool producer
Availability

 Features

 Laboratory
              Has wide distribution  in  U.S.:  found  in  almost all
              agricultural  areas.
              Plentiful;  adapts to  lab  easily;  not  too expensive;
              model ruminant;  can tolerate  surgical procedures;
              economically important; easy  to maintain and breed;
              behaves well;  good animals  for physiological and
              behavioral  studies (613).

              Light-natural  photoperiod;  temperature-"room".
Cage
 Food
              Any type of large outdoor  or indoor pen is sufficient
              as long as it gives each animal  64  sq.  ft. of
              territory (613).

              Hay supplemented  by corn and protein (613).
              Ad libitum
Water
Parasites &  Disease
                         Much  information available; wide variety
                         of parasites and diseases.
         &  Rearing
 Special  Costs
 Restrictions
                         Usually breed in fall and give  birth in
                         early  spring to early summer; 1 to 2
                         offspring per yr.  (613).
 ToxiCOlOgical Studies     590,  592,  eia,  eie,  si?,  sis,  619,  620,
                          627,  o2o,
 Ecological Alternatives   other  ruminants.
 Physiological Parameters

-------
ODOCOILEUS  sp.
H_.   • _»;-„  Deer; height  3" to3.5'; weight-females 100  to  250
UcSulpllOn  Ibs., males,  75-400  Ibs.;  carry  antlers during part
             of year, large tail; life  expectancy-15 years.

 1  "I  IT!'*   White-tail deer found  through  N.  America  except Calif.,
 AVail30lllty  Nev. , Utah; mule deer  found  in N. America west of  Great
             Plains;  both  species abundant  locally.


             Active day and night,  seen often in herds;  very alert
             creatures; generally found in  forested regions.
              Outdoor  enclosures most suitable;  cover from sun and
              cold  essential.
 p            Any enclosure  of  suitable  areal extent and height
 «3ge         will suffice;  walls-over 8  feet.
 Pgnij         Twigs,  berries,  acorns,  apples,  cereals,  dairy chow.
              Ad libitum
Water
Parasites &  Disease
 n    ..   «  Q   .     Sexual maturity-1 year;  gestation-6  to 7
 Breeding v  Hearing   months; post-partum estrous-no;  litter size-
                      1  (sometimes  2); litter  number-1 per year;
                      season-breed  in fall; birth  in  spring.

 Soecial GOStS        Large enclosures,  initial supply.

 ReStnCiiORS          Large size,  long generation time.
 lexicological  Studies  625'  631

 Ecological  Alternatives   ^bbits,
 Physiological  Parameters

-------
SAIMIRI SCIUREUS
             Sma11 New World monkey;  prehensile  tail;  head and
             body 9 to 12";  weight  -  2  to  4  Ibs.
             Imported from Colombia,  S.A.;  available  through Primate
             Imports Corporation,  34  Munson St.,  Port Washington, L.I.,
             N.Y. (613, 1205).
Features
L3iOr3tQr]f   Light-natural photoperiod; temperature - 74°F  (1205).
             15x20x30" individual cage (about the same price as a
             dog cage  (613);  24x24x28"  metal and plastic test cage
             (1205) ;  14x19x24" individual maintenance cages (1205).


             Commercially prepared chow plus oranges, fresh fruit
             and other supplements (613).
Water
          &
                        Worm parasites common; enteric and respiratory
                        problems common (613) •
Breeding &  Rearing
                        16° to 17° day gestation period.
Special Costs
Dartr jrtifliC
                        Animals fairly expensive and rare; will bite
lexicological  Studies    613'  1205
Ecological  Alternatives
Physiological  Parameters
Special Reference  The Squirrel Monkey, Cooper and Rosenblum

-------
DIDELPHIS MARSUPIALIS
            Marsupial;  head and body 15"  to 20";  tail 9" to 20";
            weight,  9 to 13 Ibs.;  life expectancy-over 7 years.
            Locally abundant throughout most of U. S.
F62tUrtS    Nocturnal, slow moving, will act dead if molested,
            odorous prehensile tail and opposable first digits.
            Light-natural photoperiod;  temperature-over 15°C;
            relative humidity-over 50%.


            Density-2;  size-20x22x!5" and larger;  material-
Cafe       galvanized metal;  nest boxes-5x5x3'  in large
            outdoor cages.


            Fruits, vegetables, eggs, carrion, dog pellets, table s<
            Ad libitum.
           4 Disease   Many and varied diseases (641, 642, 647, 649
                       650, 651, 653).

                       Sexual maturity-1 year; gestation-13 days,,  j
RroeHino  Ł fiiarintr    followed by 2 months in pouch of mother; posi^
DIBEUIIIg  ft RBdMIIg    partum estrous-no; litter size-up to 14j'li^
                       number-2 per year possible; season-warm montM
                       weaned-2 months; best results in large,
                       outdoor pens.
Special Costs          initial suPPiy.

                       Opossums are very susceptible to disease.
lexicological Studies
Ecological Alternatives
Physiological Parameters esi, 1023, 1112

-------
DASYPUS NOVEMjCINCTUS
              Armadillo; armored body; head and body 16"; tail
              15,,; wieght 8 to 17 lbs>; life expectancy 6 years.
              Southern U. S., Texas area.
Features
              Nocturnal, digger, polyembryonous.
Laboratory
Cage
              Light-natural photoperiod; temperature-over 20°C;
              relative humidity-unknown.

              Density-unknown; size-9x9x4' and 18"x4'x4' compartments
              in one cage; material-concrete floor  plywood walls;
              nest-unknown; substrate-cedar shavings; furniture-pool
              of water, logs for scratching.
Food
              Berries, fruits, roots, dog food, raw beef, milk,
              eggs, liver.
Water
              Ad libitum.
                      infection beneath dermal plates is common
Breeding &  Rearing


Special Costs
Restrictiois

lexicological  Studies
                      Sexual maturity-unknown; gestation-(delayed
                      implantation);  post-partum estrous-no; litter
                      size-1 to 12; litter number-1 per year;
                      season-breed in fall-

                      Initial supply; special caging-
                      Armadillos easily injure themselves on metal,
                      screen, etc., and armor may restrict certain
                      methods.
           Alternatives    Other armadillo species.
Physiological  Parameters  662, 663,  664, 665,  666

-------
                         SECTION VII

                        BIBLIOGRAPHY
 1.   Rudd, R.  L. 1964.  Pesticides arid the Living         j
      Landscape.  The University of Wisconsin Press,
      Madison,  Wisconsin                                   j

 2.   Animal Welfare Act, Statutes at Large,
      80 (1966) PL 89-543

 3.   Animal Welfare Act, Statutes at Large,
      84 (1970) PL 91-579

 4.   Reitz, A. W., Jr. 1972.  Environmental Law,
      North American International, Washington, D. C.

 5.   Chance, M. R. A. 1947.  Factors influencing the
      toxicity of syrnpathomimetic amines to solitary mice.
      J. Phar.  and Exp. Ther. 89:289

 6.   Webb, R.  E., Hartgrove, R. W., Randolph, W. C., et
      al. 1973.  Toxicity studies in endrin-susceptible
      and resistant strains of pine mice.  Tox. and App.
      Phar. 25:42-47

 7.   National Academy of Sciences. 1971.  Animals
      for Research.  Institute of Laboratory Animal
      Resources, National Research Council, Washington,
      D. C.

 8.   Kendeigh, S. C. 1964.  Animal Ecology.  Prentice-
      Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.

 9.   Ozburn, G. W., and Morrison, F. 0. 1962.  Development
      of a DDT-tolerant strain of laboratory mice.  Nature
      196:(4858):1009

10.   Georghiou, G. P. 1972.  The evolution of resistance
      to pesticides, pp 133-167 in Annual Review of
      Ecology and Systematic^, Vol. 3, ed. by R. F.
      Johnston.Annual Reviews, Inc. Palo Alto

11.   Hart, L.  G., et  al. 1963.  Stimulatory effects of
      chlordane on Hepatic microsomal drug metabolism in
      the rat.   Tox. App. Pharm. 5:371

12.   Cory, L., Fjeld, P., and Serat, W. 1971.  Environ-
      mental DDT and the genetics of natural populations.
      Nature 229:128-130

-------
13.   Sterburg, J.,  and Kearns,  C.  W.  1952.   The
      presence of toxins other than DDT in the blood
      of DDT-poisoned roaches.  Science 116:144

14.   Sternburg, J., et  al.  1950.   Absorption and
      metabolism of DDT by resistant and susceptible
      house flies.  J. Econ.  Entorn. 43:214

15.   O'Brien, R. D. 1967.  Insecticides Action and
      Metabolism.  Acad. Press

16.   Miyake, S. S., et  al.  1957.   Distribution of DDT-
      dehydrochlorinase in various tissues of DDT-
      resistant house flies.   J. Econ. Entom. 50:359

17.   Lovell, J. B., and Kearns, C. W. 1959.  Inheritance
      of DDT-dehydrochlorinase in the house fly.  J.
      Econ. Entom. 52:931

18.   Huxley, J. 1943.  Evolution,  The Modern Synthesis.
      Harper and Bros. New York

19.   Kapoor, I. P., et  al.  1970.   Comparative metabolism
      of methoxychlor, metEiochiochlor and DDT in mice,
      insects and in a model ecosystem.  J.  Agr. Food Chem.
      18(6):1145-1152

20.   Stickel, W. 1974 - Patuxant Wildlife Research Center,
      U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Laurel, Maryland,
      Personal Communication

21.   Woodwell, G. M. 1967.  Toxic substances and
      ecological cycles.  Sci. Am.  216(3):24-31

22.   Crosby, D. G. 1973.  The  fate of pesticides in the
      environment.  Ann. Rev. of Plant Physiology 24:467-492

23.   Gunther, F. A. 1966.  Advances in analytical
      detection of pesticides.  In: Scientific Aspects of
      Pest Control, Publ. 1402, National Acad. Sci. ,
      National Research Council, Washington, D. C.

24.   Buchsbaum, R. 1948.  Animals Without Backbones.
      U. of Chicago Press, Chicago

25.   Ball, R. C. and Curry, L. L. 1956.  Culture and
      agricultural  importance of earthworms.  Cir.  Bull. 222.
      Michigan State U., Agr. Expt. Sta.

-------
26.   Ashby, G.  J.  1972.   Earthworms.   The U.F.A.W. Handbook;
      on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals.\
      Ch 53:610-613 ed.  U.F.A.W. staff, Churchzll Livingstone
      Edinburgh and London

27.   McLane, M. A. R.,  et  al. 1971.   Organochlorine
      pesticide residues~Th woodcock,  soils, and earthworms
      in Louisiana, 1965.  Pest Mon. J. 5(3)-.248-250

28.   DeWitt, J. B., et  al. 1960.  Pesticidal residues in
      animal tissue.  Trans. Twenty-Fifth North American
      Wildlife Conference:277-285

29.   Wheatley,  G.  A., and Hardman, J. A. 1968.  Organo-
      chlorine insecticide residues in earthworms from
      arable soils.  J.  Sci. Fed. Agr. 19:219-225

30.   Doane, C.  C.  1962.   Effects of certain insecticides on
      earthworms.  J. Econ. Entomol. 55:416-418

31.   Satchell,  J.  E. 1955.  The effects of B.H.C., DDT and
      parathion on soil fauna.  Soils and Fertilizer
      18:279-285

32.   Thompson,  A.  R. 1971.  Effects of nine insecticides
      on the numbers and biomass of earthworms in pasture.
      Env. Contain,  and Tox. Bull. 5(6):577-586

33.   Bailey, T. N. 1971.  Immobilization of bobcats,
      coyotes and badgers with phencyclidine hydrochloride.
      Journal of Wildlife Management 35(4)

34.   Lipa, J. J. 1958.   Thermocline off the coast of
      Tropical West Africa.  Nature 181:863

35.   Polivka, J. B. 1951.  Effect of insecticides upon
      earthworm populations.  Ohio J.  Sci. 51(4):195-196

36    Davis, B.  N.  K. 1968.  The soil macrofauna and
      organochlorine insecticide residues at twelve
      agricultural sites near Huntingdon.  Ann. App. Bio.
      61:29-45

37.   Dimond, J. B., ej:  al. 1970.  DDT residues in robins
      and earthworms assocTated with contaminated forest
      soils.  Can.  Entomol. 102(9):1120-1130

38.   Jefferies, D. J., and Davis, B.  N. K. 1968.  Dynamics
      of dieldrin in soil, earthworms and song thrushes.
      Journal of Wildlife Management 32(3):441-456

-------
39.   Davis, B. N.  K. ,  and French,  M.  C.  1969.   The
      accumulation and loss of organochlorine insecticide
      residues by beetles, worms and slugs in sprayed
      fields.  Soil Bio.  and Biochetn.  1:45-55

40.   Davey, S. P.  1963.   Effects of chemicals  on earthworms:
      a review of the  literature.  U.S.F.W.S. Special
      Scientific Report 74:1-18

41.   Wright, C.A.  1967.   Land and freshwater Molluscs, the
      U.F.A.W.,Handbook on the Care and Management of
      Laboratory Animals, ch 52:604-609 ed. U.F.A.W. staff
      E.S. Livingstone, ltd., Edinburgh and Scotland

42.   Stephens, G.  J.,  and McGaugh, J. L.  1972.  Biological
      factors related  to learning in the land snail (Helix
      aspersa Muller).   Anim. Behav. 20:309-315

43.   Herzberg, F., and Herzberg A. 1962.   Observations on
      reproduction in  Helix aspersa.  Am.  Midland Nat.
      68:297-306

44.   Herzberg, F.  1965.   Crowding as a factor in growth
      and reproduction of Helix aspersa.   Am. Zoo. 5:254

45.   Stephens, G.  J.  and Stephens, G. C.  1966.  Photo-
      periodic stimulation of egg laying in the land snail
      Helix aspersa.  Nature 212:1582

46.   Walker, R. J. 1967.  Certain aspects of the pharma-
      cology of Helix  and Hirudo  neurons.  Symp. on
      Neurbiol. of Invert. Ed:  J. Salanki, 1967:227-253

47.   Kerkut, G. A., and Walker, R. J. 1962.  The specific
      chemical sensitivity of Helix nerve cells.  Comp.
      Biochem. Physiol. 7:277-288

48.   Kerkut, G. A., and Walker, R. J. 1961.  The effect
      of drugs on the  neurones of the snail, Helix aspersa.
      Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 3:143-160

49.   Kerkut, G. A., and Leake, L. D. 1966.  The effect of
      drugs on the snail pharangeal retractor muscle.
      Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 17:623-633

50.   Menhinick, E. F.  1962.  Comparison of invertebrate
      populations of soil and litter of mowed grasslands
      in areas treated and untreated with pesticides.
      Ecology 43(3}:556-561

-------
51.   Barnett, S.  F.  1972.  Ticks.   The U.F.A.W.  Handbook on
      the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals.Ed
      U.F.A.W. Staff, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh and ',
      London                                               i

52.   Witt, P. N.  1971.   Instructions for working with     I
      web-building spiders  in the laboratory. BioSci.      ;
      21(1)-.23-25                                           \

53.   Witt, P. N.  1974.   North Carolina Dept. of Mental    !
      Health, Raleigh N.C., Personal Communication         •

54.   Griffiths, D. C. ,  Raw, F. , and Lofty, J. R. 1967.
      The effects  on soil fauna of insecticides tested
      against wireworms  (Aariotes sp.) in wheat.  Ann.
      App. Bio. 60:479-490

55.   Pielou, D. P. 1960.   The effect of DDT on oviposition
      and on behavior in the European red mite,  Panonychus
      ulmi (Koch).  Can. J. Zoo. 38:1147-1151

56.   Lord, F. T.  1956.   The influence of spray programs
      on the  fauna of apple orchards in Nova Scotia IX.
      Studies on means of altering predator populations.
      Can. Entomologist  88:129-137

57.   Borror, D. J.,  and DeLong, D. 1954.  An Introduction
      to the Study of Insects.  Holt, Rinehart & Winston
      Co., New York

58.   Harris, C. R.,  and Svec, H.  J. 1963.  Mass rearing
      of the common field cricket, Gryllus pennsylvanicus
      for use as a test  insect in toxicological studies.
      Bulletin Entorn. Res.  54:805

59.   Rochford, P. J, 1972.  The American cockroach.  The
      U.F.A.W. Handbook  on  the Care and Management of
      Laboratory Animals .  Ed  U.F.A.W. Staff, Churchill
      Livingstone, Edinburgh and London

60.   Ashby,  G. J. 1972.  Locusts.   The U.F.A.W.  Handbook  on
      the Care and Management of Laboratory AnimalsEd,
      U.F.A.W.  Staff, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, and
      London

61.   Gurney, A. B. 1950.   Praying mantids of the United
      States, native and introduced.  Ann. Report: Smith.
      Inst. 339-362

-------
62.   Ashby, G. J.  1972.   The house cricket,  Chapter 49,
      pp 588-589 in The U.F.A.W.  Handbook on  the Care and
      Management of Laboratory Animals.   Ed.  by U.F.A.V7.  Staff,
      C. Livingstone, Edinburgh and London

63.   Brindley, W.  A., and Dahm,  P. A.  1970.   Miscroscopic
      examination of parathion activating microsomas from
      American cockroach fat body.  J.  Econ.  Entomol. 63:31-38

64.   Meksongsee, B., et  al. 1967.  Effect of inhibitors
      and inducers of microsomal enzymes on the toxicity of
      carbamate insecticides to mice and insects.  J. Econ.
      Entom. 60(5):1469-1471

65.   Nakatsugawa, T. , and Dahm,  P. A.  1965.   Parathion
      activation enzymes in the fat body microsomes of
      the American cockroach.  J. Econ.  Entom. 58(3):500-509

66.   Twarog, B. M., and Roeder,  K. D.  1957.   Pharmacological
      observations on the desheated last abdominal ganglion
      of the cockroach.  Ann. Entom. Soc. Amer. 50:231-237

67.   Hamilton, E. W. 1971.  Metabolism of aldrin and
      dieldrin by the American cockroach, Periplaneta
      americana.  Ph.D. Thesis, Iowa State University

68.   Menzer, R. E. and Casida, J.  E. 1965.  Nature of toxic
      metabolites formed in mammals, insects and plants from
      3- (Dimethoxy-phosphenyloxy)-N, N-Dimethyl-cis-crotonamide
      and its N-methyl analog.  J.  Agr.  Food Chem. 13:102-112

69.   O'Brien, R. D. 1957.  Properties and metabolism in
      the cockroach and mouse of malathion and malaoxon.
      J. Econ. Entomol. 50(2):159-164.

70.   Patel, N. G., and Cutkomp, L. K. 1967.  Pysiological
      responses of  cockroaches to  immobilization, DDT,
      and dieldrin.  J. Econ. Entom. 60(3):783-788

71.   Harris, C. R. 1964.  Influences of soil type and soil
      moisture on the toxicity of  insecticides in soils to
      insects.  Nature 202:724

72.   Cruz, C. 1972.  Chlordane effects on the hairy chinch
      bug.  Ph.D. Thesis,  Rutgers  University, State
      University of New Jersey

73.   Agosin, M., et  al.  1965.  Enhanced protein synthesis
      in Triatoma IrTfestans  treated with DDT.  Esp.  Parasitol
      16:318-324

-------
74.   Agosin, M.,  et  al. 1961.  intermediary carbohydrate  I
      metabolism of Triatoma infestans (Insecta; Hemiptera)
      - I.  Glycolytic and pentose phosphate pathway        '••
      enzymes and the effect of DDT.  Comp. Biochem.        •
      Physiol.  2:143-159

75.   Yothers, M.  A., and Carlson, F. W.  1948.  Effect of DD1'
      on the green peach aphid and its Coccinellid predators.
      J. Econ. Entom. 41:515-516

76.   Hintz, S. D. 1971.  Herbicidal influence on cereal grain
      aphids in North Dakota.  Ph.D. Thesis, North Dakota
      State University

77.   Davis, B. N. K., and Harrison, R. B. 1966.  Organ-
      ochlorine insecticide residues in soil invertebrates.
      Nature 211:1424-1425                                  ;

78.   Moffitt, H.  R., et all.  1972.  Toxicity of several
      commonly used orchard pesticides to adult Hippodamia
      convergens.   Env. Entomol. l(l):20-22

79.   Atallah, Y.  H. and Newsom, L. D. 1966.  Ecological and
      nutritional studies on Coleomegilla masculata De Geer
      (Coleoptera:  Coccinellidae). III.  The effect of DDT,
      toxophene, and endrin on the reproductive and survival
      potentials.   J. Econ. Entomol. 59:1181-1187

80.   Whitney, W.  K. 1967.  Laboratory tests with dursban
      and other insecticides in soil.  J. Econ. Entomol.
      60(1):68-74

81.   Cole, J. H.  1972.  Beetles.  The U.F.A.W. Handbook on
      the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals.Ed~~
      U.F.A.W.Staff^Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh and
      London
82.
83.
84.
Dempster, J. P. 1968.  The sublethal effect of DDT on
the rate of feeding by the ground-beetle.  Entomologia
Experimentalis et Applicable 11:51-54

Fleming, W. E., et  al. 1962.  Bioassay of soil
containing residues of chlorinated hydrocarbon in-
secticides.  U.S. Deft. Agr. Tech. Bull. No. 1246

Fleming, W. E., and Hawley, I. M. 1950.  A large-
scale test with DDT to control the Japanese beetle
J. Econ. Entomol.  43:586-590

-------
86.   Harris, C.  R.  et  al.  1958.   A laboratory method of
      mass rearing of the block cutworm,  Agrotis ypsilon,
      for insecticide tests.   Canadian Entomologist
      90(6):328-331

87.   Howell, J.  F.  1967.  Paraffin films to control
      dehydration of an artificial rearing medium for
      codling moth.   J. Econ.  Entom. 60(1):289-290


88.   Shorey, H. H., and Hale, R. L. 1965.  Mass-rearing
      of the larvae of nine Koctuid species on a simple
      artificial medium.  J. Econ. Entom. 58(3):522-524

89.   Roelofs, W. L., and Comeau,  A. 1971.   Sex pheromone
      perception:  electroantennogram responses of the
      red-banded leaf roller moth.  J.  Insect.  Physiol.
      17:1969-1982

90.   Roelofs, W. L. and Arn,  H.  1968.   Sex attractant of
      the red-banded leaf roller moth.   Nature  219:513

91.   Jacobson, M.,  et  al.  1970.   Sex pheromones of the
      Lepidoptera.  Recent progress and structure-activity
      relationships, in:  Chemicals Controlling Insect
      Behavior.  Ed.  M. Berosa,  Acad.  Press, New York

92.   Berger, R.  S.  1966.  Isolation, identification, and
      synthesis of the sex attractant of the cabbage looper,
      Trichoplusia ni.   Jhn.  Entom. Soc.  America 59(4):767-
      771

93.   Shorey, H.  H.  e_t  al.  1965.   Sex pheromones of Noctuid
      moths.  VI.   Absence of behavioral specificity for the
      female sex pheremones of Trichoplusia ni versus
      Autographa californica and Heliothis zea versus
      H. yirescens  (Lepidoptera;Noctuidae).  Ann. of the
      Entomol. Soc. of America 58(5):600-603

94.   Nasim,  A.,  and Brindley, W.  A. 1971.   Effects of
      chlorcyclizine or phenobarbitol on in vitro detoxi-
      fication activity by larvae wax moth gut homogenates.
      Tox. and App. Phar. 18:124-132

95.   Ahmad,  N.,  and Brindley, W.  A. 1969.   Modification of
      parathion toxicity to wax moth larvae by chlorcyclizine,
      aminopyrine or phenobarbital.  Tox. and App. Phar.
      15:433-440

-------
 96.    Polles, S.  G. 1970.  The fate of C14-labeled endrin  I
       in tobacco  budworm (Heliothis virescens) (Fabricius)
       larvae.  Ph.D.  Thesis, Mississippi State University  ;

 97.    Kishaba, A. N.  et  al. 1967.  Laboratory technique for
       studying flight of Cabbage looper moths and the effects
       of age, sex, food, and tepa on flight characteristics.'
       J. of Econ. Entomol.   60(2):359-365                  »

 98.    Ashby, G. J. 1972.  The house fly, Chapter 43,       }
       pp 549-553  in The U.F.A.W. Handbook on the Care and  I
       Management  of Laboratory Animals.  Ed. by U.F.A.W.   i
       Staff, C. Livingstone, Edinburgh and London          ;

 99.    Stones, L.  C. 1972.  The stablefly, Chapter 45,.     \
       pp 556-564  in The U.F.A.W. Handbook on the Care and
       Management  of Laboratory Animals.  Ed. U.F.A.W. Staff,!
       Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh and London          I

100.    Bemrick, W. J.  and Schlotthauer, J. C. 1969.  Mosquito
       colonies in veterinary research.  Lab. An. Care
       19:186-190                                            '•

101.    Hilsenhoff, W.  L. and R. P. Narf 1967.  Colonization
       of Chironomus plumosus.  Mosquito News 27:363

102.    Wheeler, M. R.  1972.   Fruitflies, Chapter 42,
       pp 543-548  in The U.F.A.W. Handbook on the Care and
       Management  of Laboratory Animals,  Ed. by U.F.A.W.
       Staff, 4th  ed.   C. Livingstone, Edinburgh and London

103.    Ashby, G. J. 1972.   Blowflies, The U.F.A.W. Handbook
       on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals^
       ch 44:554-555.   Ed. U.F.A.W. Staff, Churchill Living-
       stone, Edinburgh and London.

104.    Reynolds, H. H., and Back, K. C. 1966.  Effect of
       injected monomethyl hydrazine on primate performance.
       Tox. and App. Phar. 9:376-389

105.    Biever, K.  D. 1965.  A rearing technique for the
       colonization of Chironomid nidges.  Ent. Soc.
       America 58:135-136

106.    Yeatman, F. R.  and Hirsch, J. 1971.  Attempted
       replication of and selective breeding for instrumental
       conditioning of Drosophila melanogaster.  Animal
       Behav. 19:454-462.

-------
107.   Monteith, L.  G.  1963.   Habituation and associative
       learning in Drino bqhemica Mesh (DipterarTachinidae).
       Can. Ent. 95:418-426

108.   Benezet, H. J.,  and Forgash,  A. J. 1972.   Penetration
       and distribution of topically applied malathion in
       the house fly.   J. Econ.  Entom. 65:53-57

109.   Gerolt, P. 1969.  Mode of entry of contact insecti-
       cides.  J. Insect Physiol. 15:563-580

110.   Blend, M. J.  1970.  In vivo and in vitro  effects of
       low concentrations of dieldrin and steroid hormones
       on the dog prostate^  Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell Univer-
       sity, Ithaca, New York

111.   Ilnytzka, S.  1970.  Bioassay of insecticide residue
       in soils.  Ph.  D. Thesis, McGill University, Montreal,
       Canada

112.   Sharma, N. 1973.  Sublethal insecticide and its effect
       on reproduction in the housefly, Musca domestica L.
       and the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti L.
       Ph.D. Thesis, Rutgers University, State University
       of New Jersey

113.   Johnsen, R. E.,  and Dahn, P.  A. 1966.  Activation and
       degradation efficiencies of liver microsomes from eight
       vertebrate species, using organophosphates as sub-
       strates.  J.  Econ. Entomol. 59:1437-1442

114.   Beard, R. 1965.   Ovarian suppression by DDT and
       resistance in the house fly  (Musca domestica L.)
       Entom. Exp. Appl. 8:193-204

115.   Vinopal, J. H.,  and Johansen, C. A. 1967.  Selective
       toxicity of four 0-(methylcarbomyl) oximes to the
       house fly and the honey bee.  J. Econ. Entom.
       60(3):794-798

116.   Bateman, A. J.  1966.  Testing chemicals for muta-
       genicity in a mammal.  Nature 210:205-206

117.   Luning, K. G. ,  1966.  Drosophila-tests in pharma-
       cology.  Nature 209:84-86

118.   Sokal, R. R. 1959.  A morphometric analysis of
       strains of Drosophila melanogaster differing in DDT
       resistance.  J.  Kansas Entom. Soc. 32(4):155-172

-------
119.   Altenburg, L. S.  1958.  The effect of photoreactivat-
       ing light on the mutation rate induced.in Drosophila
       by tertiary-butyl hydroperoxide.   Genetics 43:662-664

120.   Holm, S. N. 1966.  The utilization and management of
       bumble bees for red clover and alfalfa seed production
       Ann. Rev. Entomol. 11:155-182

121.   Morton, H. L. 1974.  Agricultural research service,
       USDA, Tucson, Arizona, Personal Communication

122.   Morton, H. L., et  al. 1972.  Toxicity of herbicides
       to newly emerged honey bees.  Env. Entomol. 1(1):
       102-104                                               !

123.   Morse, R. A. 1961.  The effect of sevin on honey bees.
       J. Econ. Entomol. 54 (3):566-568

124.   Levin, M. D., e_t  al.  1968.  Impact on colonies of
       honey bees of ultra low-volume (undiluted) malathion
       applied for control of grasshoppers. J. Econ. Entom.
       61(l):58-62

125.   Waller, G. D. 1969.  Susceptibility of an alfalfa
       leaf-cutting bee to residues of insecticides on
       foliage.  J. Econ. Entom. 62(1):189-192

126.   Anderson, L. D. 1952.   Toxicity of several new
       insecticides to honey bees.  J. Econ. Entom. 45(3):
       466-469

127.   Ahmad, Z. 1971.  Selective toxicity of carbophenothion
       and trichlorfon to the honey bee, Apis mellifera
       Linnaeus and the alfalfa leaf cutter bee, Megachile^
       rotundata Fabricius. Ph.D.  Thesis, Washington State
       University

128.   Graves, J. B., and Mackensen, 0.  1965.  Topical
       application and insecticide resistance studies on the
       honeybee.  J. Econ. Entom. 58 (5) .-990-993

129.   Anderson, L. D.,  and Atkins, E. L., Jr. 1958.
       Toxicity of pesticides to honey bees in laboratory
       and field tests in southern California, 1955-1956.
       J. Econ. Entom. 51(1):103-108

130.   Edwards, C. A., Dennis, E. B. , and Empson, D. W. 1967.
       Pesticides and the soil fauna:  effect of aldrin and
       DDT in an arable field.  Ann. App. Bio. 60:11-22

-------
131.   Reichle, D. E. 1967.  Radioisotope turnover and energy
       flow in terrestrial isopod populations.  Ecology
       48:351-366

132.   Deoras, P. J. 1967.  Handling of scorpions.  Husbandry
       of Lab Animals:17-20

133.   Connant, R. 1958.  A Field Guide to Reptiles and
       Amphibians of the United States and Canada, East of
       the 100th Meridian.  Boston, Houghton Mifflin

134.   DiBerardino, M. A. 1967.  Frogs.  Methods in Develop-
       mental Bio,  pp. 53-74

135.   Schmidt, R. S., and Hudson, W. R. 1969.  Maintenance
       of adult Anurans.  Lab. An. Care 19(5) :617-620

136.   Shapiro, H. 1965.  A plastic frog tank, with obser-
       vations on survival.  Lab. An. Care 15(6):422-425

137.   Nace, G. W. 1968.  The amphibian facility of the
       University of Michigan.  BioSci. 18(8):767-775

138.   Fankhauser, G. 1963.  Amphibia.;  Animals for Research.
       Principles of Breeding and Management, 17:475-498,
       New York Academic Press

139.   Kaplan, H. M., et  al. 1964.  Toxicity of fluoride for
       frogs.  Lab. An. Care 14:185-188

140.   Cameron, J. A. 1940.  Effect of flourine on-hatching
       time and hatching stage in Rana pipiens.  Eco;
       21(2)-.288-292

141.   Kaplan, H. M. 1969.  Anesthesia in amphibians and
       reptiles.  Fed. Proc. 28 (4):1541-1546

142.   Boterenbrood, E. C. 1972.   Urodeles, Chapter 39,
       pp 520-532 in The U.F.A.W. Handbook on the Care and
       Management of Laboratory Animals. Ed. by U.F.A.W.
       Stafft C« Livingstone, Edinburgh and London

143.   Hirschfield, W. J., et  al. 1970.  Growth of larval
       and juvenile Rana pipTens on four laboratory diets.
       Am. Zool. 10(317315

144.   Berns, M. W. 1965.  Research notes.  Mortality caused
       by kidney stones in spinach-fed frogs.  Bio. Sci.
       15(4):297-298

-------
145.   Wright, P.  A., and Flathers, A. R. 1961.  Faciliationj
       of pituitary-induced frogs ovulation by progesterone j
       in early fall.  Proc. Soc. Exp. Bid Med. 106:346-347 {

146.   Gibbs, E.  L.,  Gibbs, T. J., and VanDyck, P. C. 1972.
       Rana pipiens;   health and disease.  Lab. An. Care
       T6l2~) :142-160
                                                            j
                                                            i
147.   Meeks, R.  L. ,  1968.  The accumulation of 36 Cl ring- j
       labeled DDT in a freshwater marsh.  J. Wildlife Mgmt. j
       32(2):376-398                                         j
                                                            i
148.   Herald, E.  S.  1949.  Effects of DDT oil solutions upori
       amphibians  and reptiles.  Herpetologica 5:117-120    j

149.   Korschgen,  L.  J. 1970.  Soil-food-chain-pesticide    \
       relationships  in aldrin-treated fields.  Journal of  j
       Wildlife Management 34(1):186                        |

150.   Ferguson,  D.  E., and Gilbert, C. C. 1968.  Tolerances:
       of three species of Anuran amphibians to five chlor- j
       inated hydrocarbon insecticides.  J. Minn. Acad. Sci.l
       13:135-138                                            ;

151.   Kaplan, H.  M., and Overpeck, J. G. 1954.  Toxicity
       of halogenated hydrocarbons insecticides for the frog,
       Rana pipiens.   Herpetologica 20(3):163-169
                                                            I
152.   Potter, J.  L., and O'Brien, R. D. 1964.  Parathion   \
       activation  by livers of aquatic and terrestrial      ;
       vertebrates.   Science 144:55-57                      !

153.   Upshall, D. G., et  al. 1968.  Biochemical studies on
       the teratogenic action of bidrin and other neuroactivs
       agents in developing hen eggs.  Biochem. Phar.
       17:1529-1542                                          I

154.   Boyd, C. E.,  e_t  al.  Possible DDT resistance in two i
       species of  frogs.  Copeia (2):426-429                I

155.   Sanders, H. O. 1970.  Pesticide toxicities to tadpoles
       of the western chorus frog, Psendacris triseriata, and
       Fowler's toad, Bufo woodhousli fowleri.Copeia(2):
       246-251

156.   Bucher, N.  L.  R. 1946.  Effects of 2, 4-dichloro-    i
       phenoxyacetic acid on experimental animals.  Proc.   '
       Soc. Exp.  Bio. Med. 63:204                           :

-------
157.   Goldfischer, S. et~.  al.  1970.   Cooper in hepatocyte
       lysosomes of the toad,  Bufo marinus L.  Nature
       288:172-173

158.   Kilburn, K. H. 1967.   Mucociliary clearance from
       bullfrog (Rana cantesbiana)  lung.  J. App.  Physiol.
       23:804-810

159.   Bernfeld, P., Nixon,  C.  W.,  and Homburger,  F. 1964.
       Studies on the effect of irritant vapors on ciliary
       mucus transport.  Tox.  and App. Phar. 6:103-111

160.   Schlumberger, H. G.,  and Lucke, B. 1948.  Tumors in
       fishes, amphibians and reptiles.  Cancer Research
       8:657-754

161.   Elkan, E. 1963.  Three different types of tumors in
       Salientia.  Cancer Research 23, Nov. :1641-1645

162.   Balls, M. 1962.  Spontaneous neoplasms in amphibia:
       a review and descriptions of six new cases.  Cancer
       Research 22:1142-1154

163.   Van Der Steen, A. B.  M., et  al. 1972.   Cutaneous
       neoplasms in the Leopard Frog  (Rana pipiens).  Lab.
       An. Sci. 22(2):216-222

164.   Duryee,.W. R. 1965.   Factors,influencing development
       of tumors in frogs.   N.  Y.  Acad. Sci. 126:59-84

165.   Gaumer, A. H., and Goodnight, C. J. 1957.  Some
       aspects of the hematology of turtles as related to
       their activity.  Am.  Mid. Nat. 58:332-340

166.   Doyle, R. E. , and Moreland, A. F. 1968.  Diseases of
       turtles.  Lab. An. Digest 4:3-6

167.   Stickel, L. F. 1951.   Wood mouse and box turtle pop-
       ulations in an area treated annually with DDT for five
       years.  Journal of Wildlife Management 15(2):161-164.

168.   Benes, E. S. 1968.  A study in laboratory maintenance
       of the Gila monster.   Lab. An. Care 18(l):69-74

169.   Boam, G. W. and Cowan, D. F.,  1970.  The pathogenicity
       for mice of two species of salmonella isolated from
       the green iguana.  J.A.V^M.A.  157(5):617-619

170    Marcus, L. C. 1971.   Infectious diseases of reptiles.
       J.A.V.M.A. 159(11):1626-1631

-------
171.    Wallach, J.  D.  1971.  Environmental and nutritional I
       diseases of  captive reptile.  J.A.V.M.A. 159(11)    [
       1632-1643

172.    Johnson, T.  S., et  al. 1967.  Cellular renewal of
       intestinal epithelium in the western fence lizard
       Sceloporus occidentalis.  Can. J. Zoo.  45:63-71

173.    King, F. W.  1971.  Housing, sanitation, and nutrition
       of reptiles.  J.A.V.M.A. 159(11):1612-1615
                                                           {
174.    George, J. L. ,  and Stickel, W. H. 1949.  Wildlife   j
       effects of DDT dust used for tick control on a Texas j
       prairie.  Am. Midi. Nat. 42(1):228-237              j

175.    Burghardt, G. 1974.  Psychology Dept., University of j
       Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee,  Personal Communicatioi

176.    Karlstrom, E. L., and Cook, S. F., Jr. 1955.        \
       Herpetological notes.  Copeia, 1955  (l):57-58       ;

177.    Brazenor, C. W., and Kaye, G. 1953.  Anaesthesia for i
       reptiles.  Copeia, 1953 (3):165-170                  ;

178.    Betz, T. W.  1962.  Surgical anesthesia in reptiles,
       with special reference to the water snake, Natrix    j
       rhombitera.   Copeia 2:284-287                        \

179.    Hackenbrock, C. R., and Finster,  M. 1963.   Fluorthane;
       a rapid and safe inhalation anesthetic for poisonous
       snakes.  Copeia 2:440-441                            \

180.    Cosgrove, G. E. 1971.  Reptilian radiobiology.
       J.A.V.M.A. 159(11):1678

181.    Greichus, Y. A. 1974.  Dept. of Biochemistry, South
       Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota,
       Personal Communication

182.    Elder, W. H. 1972.  Lecture notes on ornithology.
       Dept. of Zoology, University of Missouri, Columbia

183.    Pettingill,  0.  S., Jr. 1970.  Ornithology in
       Laboratory and Field, 4th edition.  Burgess
       Publishing Company, pp 352-369

184.    Prestt, I. 1971.  Techniques for assessment of pol-
       lution effects on seabirds.  Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond.
       177:287-294

-------
185.   Keith, J. O.  1966.   Insecticide contaminations in
       wetland habitats and their effect on fish-eating
       birds.  J. App.  Ecology 3:71-85 (suppl.)

186.   Hannon, M. R.  1972.   Distribution and physiological
       effects of DDT,DDD and DDE in penned double-crested
       cormorants. Ph.D.Thesis,South Dakota State University

187.   Anderson, D.  W. , and Hickey,  J. J. 1970.   Oological
       data on egg and breeding characteristics  of brown
       pelicans.  Wilson Bulletin 82, (l):14-28

188.   Anderson, D.  W., and Hickey,  J. J. 1972.   Eggshell
       changes in certain North American birds.   Proc. of
       15th Intl. Orno. Cong. 514-540

189.   Anon. 1967.  USDI Fish and Wildlife Serv. Res. Publ.
       43:57-58

190.   Blus, L. J. 1970.  Measurements of brown  pelican
       eggshells from Florida and South Carolina.  BioSci.
       20(15):867-869

191.   Fredrickson,  L.  1971.  Lecture notes on waterfowl
       biology.  Dept of Zoology, University of  Missouri,
       Columbia

192.   Grandy, J. W., Locke, L.  N.,  and Bagley,  G> E.  1968.
       Relative toxicity of lead and five proposed sub-
       stitute shot types to pen-reared mallards.  Journal
       of Wildlife Management 32(3):483-488

193.   Longcore, J.  R., et al. 1971.  DDE thins  eggshells
       and lowers reproductive success of captive black
       ducks.  Bull,  of Environmental Contamination and
       Toxicology 6(6):485-490

194.   Winner, R. W.  1972.  Activity of black and mallard
       ducks in a controlled environment.  J. Wildlife
       Mgmt. 36:187-191

195.   Friend, M., and D. 0. Trainer 1970.  Polychlorinated
       biphenyl:  interaction with duck hepatitis virus.
       Science 170:1314-1316

196.   Johnsgard, P.A.  1968.  Waterfowl - their biology  and
       natural history.  U. of Nebraska Press, Lincoln

-------
197.    Hyde, K.  M.  1972.   Studies of the responses of
       selected wildlife  species to rnirex bait exposure.
       Ph.D. Thesis, Louisiana State University and
       Agricultural and Mechanical College

198.    Bunch, T. D. 1971.  Effects of dieldrin on chromo-
       somes of bone marrow and lymphocytes of the semi-
       domestic mallard duck.  Ph.D. Thesis, Utah State
       University.

199.    Tucker, R. K. , and Haegele, M. A. 1971.  Comparative
       acute oral toxicity of pesticides to six species of
       birds.  Tox. and App. Phar. 20:57-65

200.    Heath, R. G. 1969.  Nationwide residues of organo-
       chlorine pesticides in wings of mallards and black
       ducks.  Pest. Mon. J. 3(2):115

201.    Balasubromanion, A. 1971.  Effect of certain
       organochlorines on reproduction in chickens and
       mallard ducks.  Ph.D. Thesis Louisiana State
       University and Agricultural and Mechanical College

202.    Wallach,  J.  D. and Flieg, G. M. 1969.  Hyperparathyroi
       ism in captive bonds.  J.A.V.M.A. 155 (7) :1046-1051

203.    Dindal, D. L. , and Peterle, T. J. 1968.  Wing and
       body tissue relationships of DDT and metabolite
       residues in mallard and lesser scaup ducks.  Env.
       Contain, and Tox. Bull. 3(l):37-48

204.    Johnson,  L.  G. , and Morris, R. L. 1971.  Pesticide
       and mercury levels in migrating duck populations.
       Env. Contain, and Tox. Bull. 6(6):513-516

205.    Cook, R.  S., and Trainer, D. 0. 1966.  Experimental
       lead poisoning of  Canada geese.  Journal of Wildlife
                         -
       Management 30(1): 1-8
206.   Trainer, D. 0., and Hunt, R. A. 1964.  Lead poisoning
       of waterfowl in Wisconsin.  Journal of Wildlife
       Management 28:95

207.   Vermeer, K. , and Armstrong, F. A. J. 1972.  Mercury
       in Canadian prairie ducks.  J. Wildlife Mgmt.  36(1) :
       179-182

208.   Curnow, R. D.  1970.  Kinetics of 65-zinc in the
       mallard.  Ph.D. Thesis, Colorado State University

-------
209.   Keith, J.O.,  and Mulla,M.S.  1965.  Relative toxicity
       of five organophosporus mosquito larvicides to mallard
       ducks.  Journal of Wildlife  Management 29:553-563

210.   Dustman, E.H.,  and Stickel,  L.F. 1969.  The occurence
       and significance of pesticide residues in wild animals.
       Annals of N.Y.  Academy of Sciences 160(1):162-172

211.   Springer, P.P.  1957.  Effects of herbicides, fungicides
       on wildlife.   N. Caro. Pest. Man.  1957:87-106

212.   Hartung,R.,  and Hunt,G.S. 1966.   Toxicity of some oils
       to waterfowl.  Journal of Wildlife Management 30(3):
       564-570

213.   Barrett, M.W.,  and Karstad,L.H.  1971.  A flourescent
       erythrocyte test for lead poisoning in waterfowl.
       Journal of Wildlife Management 35(1):109

214.   Heath, R.G.  e_t al. 1972.  Comparative dietary toxic-
       ities of pesticides to birds. Special Scientific Report
       Wildlife No.  152, Washington, D.C.

215.   Lock, D. 1968.   The growth rate  and related factors
       in Procellariiforms, Chapter 22, pp 267-283 in Eco.
       Adp. Breeding in Birds.  Methune & Co. Ltd.

216.   Wurster, C.  F. , Jr., and Wingate,  D. B. 1968.  DDT
       residues and declining reproduction in the Bermuda
       Petrel.  Science 159:979-981

217.   Robinson, J., ŁŁ.Ł!• 1967.  Organochlorine residues
       in marine organisms.  Nature 214:1307-1311

218.   Parslow, J.  L.  F., et al. 1972.   Ingested pollutants
       in puffins and their eggs.  Bird Study, March:18-33

219.   Moore, N.W.,  and Tatton, J.O'G.  1965.  Organochlorine
       insecticide residues in the eggs of sea birds.  Nature
       207:42-43

220.   Homes, D.C. ,  Simmons, J.H.,  and  Tatton, J.O'G. 1967.
       Chlorinated hydrocarbons in British Wildlife.  Nature
       216:227

221.   Peterson, R.T.  1934.  A Field Guide to the Birds.
       Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston

-------
222.   Flickinger/ E. L. , and Meeker, D.L. 1972. Pesticide  j
       mortality of young white faced ibis in Texas.        j
       Bulletin Envir. Contain. Tox. 8(3):165-168            I

223.   Fowler, J. F. 1970.  Effect of dieldrin on egg       i
       hatchability and chick survival in purple and common ;
       gallinules.  Ph.D. Thesis, The Louisiana State       i
       University and Agricultural and Mechanical College   :

224.   Lamont, T. , and Reichel,,W. 1970.  Organochlorine     •
       pesticide residues in whooping cranes and everglade  \
       kites. Br.Sport Fisheries and Wildlife 87 (1):158-159 !

225.   Stickel, W. H. , et_  al., 1965.  Care of captive
       woodcocks.  J. of Wildlife Mgmt. 29(1):161-172

226.   Wright,B.S. 1960.  Woodcock reproduction in  DDT sprayed
       areas of New Brunswick.  J.W. Mgt. 24(4):419-420

227.   Kreitzer, J.F. 1971.  Thickness of the American
       woodcock eggshell.  Bull, of Environmental Contamin-
       ation and Toxicology 9 (5):281-286

228.   Wright, B.S. 1965.  Some effects of heptachlor and
       DDT on New Brunswick woodcocks.  Journal of Wildlife
       Management 29(1):172-185

229.   Stickel, W. H. , Hayne, D. W., and Stickel, L. F. 1965.
       Effects of heptachlor contaminated earthworms on wood-
       cocks.  Journal of Wildlife Management 29(1):132-146

230.   Stickel,W.H., et al. 1965.  Body condition and response
       to pesticides In woodcocks.  Journal of Wildlife
       Management 29:147-155

231.   Keith, J. A. 1966.  Reproduction in population of
       herring gulls (Larus argentatus) contaminated by DDT.
       J. App. Ecology 3:57 (suppl.)

232.   Zitko, V., and Choi, P.M.K. 1972.  PCB and p,p^DDE
       in eggs of cormorants,  gulls and ducks from the bay
       of Fundy, Canada.  Bulletin of Envir. Contain. Tox.
       7(l):63-64

233.   Jefferies, D.J., and Parslow,J.I.F. 1972.  Effect of
       one polychlorinated biphenyl on size and activity of
       the gull thyroid.  Env. Contam. and Tox. Bull. 8(5):
       306-310

-------
234.   Koeman, J.  H.,  et al.  1969.   Chlorinated biphenyls in
       fish,  mussels  and birds from the River Rhine and the
       Netherlands coastal area.  Nature 221:1126-1128

235.   Zitko, V.,  e_t  al_. 1972.  Polychlorinated terphenyls
       in the environment.  Env.  Contarn, and Tox. Bull.
       7(4) :200-201

236.   Hickey, J.J.,  and Anderson,  D.W. 1968.  Chlorinated
       hydrocarbons and eggshell changes in raptorial and
       fish-eating birds.  Science  162:271-273

237.   Anderson, D. W. 1970.   Chlorinated hydrocarbons:
       their dynamics and eggshell  effects in herring gulls
       and other species.  Ph.D.  Thesis, The University of
       Wisconsin,  Madison, Wisconsin

238.   Scott, T. G.,  et  al.  1959.   Some effects of a field
       application of dieldrin on wildlife.  Journal of
       Wildlife Management 23:409-427

239.   Porter, R.  D., and Wiemeyer, S. N. 1970.  Propagation
       of captive American kestrels.  J. Wildlife Mgmt.
       34(3):594-604

240.   Lincer, J.  L. , and Peakall,  D. B. 1970.  Metabolic
       effects of polychlorinated biphenyls in the American
       kestrel.  Nature 288:783-784

241.   Henny, C.J. 1972.  An analysis of population dynamics
       of selected avain species with special reference to
       changes during the modern pesticide era.  Wildlife
       Res. Report 1:1-99, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

242.   Fyfe, R.W., et al. 1969.  Regional population declines
       and organochlorlrTe insecticides in Canadian prairie
       falcons.  Can. Field Naturalist 83:191^-200

243.   Porter, W.D.,  and Wiemeyer,S.N. 1972.  DDE at low
       dietary level kills captive  American kestrels.
       Bulletin of Envir. Contain. Tox 8:193-199

244.   Wiemeyer, S.N., and Porter,R.D. 1970.  DDE thins
       eggshells of captive American kestrels.  Nature
       227:737-738

245.   Risebrough, R. W. , e_t al. 1968.  Polychlorinated
       biphenyls in global ecosystem.  Nature 220:1098-1102

-------
246.   Bagley, G.E.,  Reichel, W.L., and Cromartie, E. 1970.
       Identification of polychlorinated biphenyls in two
       bald eagles by combined gas-liquid chromatography—
       mass spectrometry.   J. AOAC 53 (2):251-261

247.   Finreite, N.,  and Karstad, L. 1971.   Effects of diet-
       ary methyl mercury on red-tailed hawks.  Journal of
       Wildlife Management 35(2):293-300

248.   Moore, W.W., and Walker, C.H. 1964.   Organic chlorine
       insecticide residues in wild birds.   Nature 201:1072-
       1073

249.   U. S. Bureau Fisheries and Wildlife 1966.  Pesticide
       wildlife relationships. U.S. Dept. Int. Resource
       Public. 43

250.   Haegele, M. A., and Hudson, R. H. 1973.  DDE effects
       on reproduction of ring doves.  Envir. Poll. 4:53-57

251.   Jefferies, D.  J., and French, M. C.  1972.  Changes
       induced in the pigeon thyroid by p^-DDE and dieldrin.
       J. Wildlife Mgmt. 36:24-30

252.   Sturtevant, J. 1971.  The effects of mestranol con-
       taining synthetic grit on the breeding of pigeons.
       Tox. and App.  Phar. 19:634-648

253.   Lincer, J.L.,  and Peakall,D.B. 1973.  PCB pharmaco-
       dynamics in the ring dove and early gas chromato-
       graphic peak diminution.  Envir. Poll. 4:59-68

254.   Jenner, C.E.,  and Engels, W.L. 1951.  The period of
       darkness as the critical factor in the photoperiodic
       response of birds.   Anat. Rec. 11:548

255.   Robinson, J. et al. 1967.  Residues of dieldrin  (Heod)
       in the tissues of experimentally poisoned birds.
       Life Sci. 6:12-7-1220

256.   Anon. 1965.  USDI Fish and Wildlife Serv. Res. Publ.
       23:50-51

257.   Peakall, D. B. 1971.  Effect of polychlorinated
       biphenyls  (PCB's) on the eggshell of ring doves.
       Env. Contain, and Tox. Bull. 6(2):100-101

258.   Locke, L. N.,  and Bagley, G. E.  1967.  Lead poisoning
       in a sample of Maryland morning doves.  Journal of
       Wildlife Management. 31(3):515-518

-------
259.   Jefferies,  D.  J.,  and French,  M.  C.  1969.   Avian
       thyroid:   effect of p,j/-DDT on size, and activity.
       Science 166:1278-1280

260.   Brown, V.  K.,  et  al. 1965.  The  effects of aldrin
       and dieldrin  on birds.  Food and  Cosmetic Tox.
       3(4):675-679

261.   Sturtevant, J. 1970.  Pigeon control by chemosteri-
       lization:   population model fronv laboratory results.
       Science 170:322-324

262.   Mulder, J.  B., and Brown, R. V. 1972.  An anesthetic
       unit for small laboratory animals.   Lab. An. Sci.
       22(3):422-423

263.   Dews,  P.B.  1955.  Studies on behavior I.  Differential
       sensitivity to pentobarbital of pecking performance
       in pigeons depending on the Schedule of Reward.
       J. Phar.  and  Exp.  Ther. 113:393-401

264.   Dews,  P.B.  1950.  Effects of chlorpromazine and
       cromazine on performance on a mixed schedule of
       reinforcement-  J- Exp. Anal,  of  Behav. l(l):73-82

265.   Dews,  P.B.  1957.  Studies of behavior III. Effects of
       scopolamine on reversal of a discriminatory perfor-
       mance in pigeons.   J. Phar. and Exp. Ther. 115:343-353

266.   Sturtevant, J., and Wentworth, B. C. 1970.  Effect on
       acceptability and fecundity to pigeons of coating SC
       12937 bait with zein or ethocel.   Journal of Wildlife
       Management 34(4):776-782

267.   Blough, D.  S. 1958.  New test for tranquilizers.
       Science 127:586

268.   Dews,  P.B.  1956.  Modification by drugs of performance
       on simple schedules of positive reinforcement.  N.Y.
       Acad.  Sci., Ann. 65:268-281

269.   Reynolds, G.  S., Catania, A. C.,  and Skinner, B. F.
       1963.   Conditioned and unconditioned aggression in
       pigeons.  J.  Exp. Anal, of Behav. 6(l):73-74

270.   Blough, P.N.  1971.  The visual acuity of the pigeon for
       distant targets.  J. Exp. Anal, of Behav. 15(l):57-67

271.   Hanson, H.M., Witoslawski, J.J.,  and Campbell, E.H. ,
       1964.   Tox. and App. Phar. 6:690-695

-------
272.   Kelleher, R. T.  1966.  Conditioned reinforcement in  i
       second-order schedules.  J. Exp. Anal, of Behav.
       9(5):475-485

273.   Tansy, M.F., and Roth, R.P. 1970.  Pigeons: a new role
       in air pollution.  J. Air Poll. Control Assoc. 20:
       307-309

274.   Haynes, R.J. 1972.  Effects of DDT on glycogen and
       lipid levels of bobwhites.  J. Wildlife Mgmt. 36(2):
       518-523

275.   Hill, E.F. 1971.  Toxicity of selected mosquito larvi-
       cides to some common ayian species.  Journal of Wild-
       life Management 36(4) :757-762

276.   Heath, R. G., and Spann, J. W. 1973.  Reproduction
       and related residues in birds fed mirex, pp 421-435
       in Pesticides and the Environment;  A Continuing
       Controversy, ed. by W. B. Deichman.  Intercontinental
       Medical Book Corp., New York

277.   Bagley, G. E., and Cromartie, E. 1973.  Elimination
       pattern of aroclor 1254 components in the bobwhite.
       J. Chromatog.  75:219-226

278.   Hill, E. F., Dale, W. E., and Miles, J. W, 1971.
       DDT intoxication in birds:  subchronic effects and
       brain residues.   Tox. and App. Phar. 20:502-514

279.   Bergstrand, J.,  and Klimstra, W. D. 1962.  Toxicity
       of "dybar" to bobwhite quail.  Journal of Wildlife
       Management 26(3):325-327

280.   James, D., and Davis, K. B. 1965.  The effect of
       sublethal amounts of DDT on the discrimination
       ability of the bobwhite, Colinus virginianus
       (Linnaeus).  Am. Zool. Abstracts 5:229

281.   DeWitt, J.B. 1955.  Effects pf chlorinated hydrocarbon
       insecticides upon quail and pheasants.  Agr. and Food
       Chem. 3(8):672-676

282.   DeWitt, J. B. 1956.  Chronic toxicity to quail and
       pheasants of some chlorinated insecticides.  J. Agr.
       Food Chem. 4 (10) :863-866

283.   Heath, R. G. , et_  al. 1972.  Effects of polychlori-
       nated biphenyls  on birds.  Proc. of the 15th
       International Ornithological Congress

-------
284.   Percival,  H.  F.  1972.   Concentrations of selected
       chlorinated hydrocarbons in bobwhite quail and natural
       quail foods with notes of effects  on reproduction.
       Ph.D. Thesis, Clemson  University

285.   Schafer, E. W.,  and Brunton, R.  B.  1971.  Chemicals as
       bird repellents:  two  promising  agents.   Journal of
       Wildlife Management 35 (3):569-572

286.   Rosene, W. 1965.  Effects of field application of
       heptachlor on bobwhite quail and other wild animals.
       Journal of Wildlife Management 29 (3)-.554-580

287.   Barrett, M. W. ,  and Bailey, E.  D.  1972.   Influence of
       metabolizable energy on condition  and reproduction of
       pheasants.  J. Wildlife Mgmt. 36:12-23

288.   Summers, J. D.,  et  al. 1966.  Poultry feed formulas.
       Ontario Agri. Coll. Uni. of Guelph

289.   Ralson Purina Company.  1961.  Manual for Laboratory
       Animal Care.  Ralston  Purina Company

290.   Atkins, T. D., and Linder, R. L. 1967.  Effects of
       dieldrin on reproduction of penned hen pheasants.
       Journal of Wildlife Management 31:746-753

291.   Genelly, R. E. ,  and Rudd, R. L.  1956.  Effects of DDT,
       toxaphene and dieldrin on pheasant reproduction.
       Auk. 73:529-539

292.   Spann, J.  W., et  al.  1972.  Ethyl mercury p-toluene
       sulfonanilide:  Lethal and reproductive effects on
       pheasants.  Science 175:328-331

293.   Kreitzer, J. F., and Spann, J. W.  1973.  Tests of
       pesticidal synergism with young pheasants and Japanese
       quail.  Bulletin Envir. Contain.  Tox 9(4):250-256

294.   Dahlgren, R. B., Greichus, Y. A.,  and Linder, R. L.
       1971.  Storage and excretion of polychlorinated bi-
       phenyls in the pheasant.  Journal of Wildlife Manage-
       ment 35(4):823-828

295.   Burrage, R. H., and Saha, J. G.  1972.  Insecticide
       residues in pheasants  after being fed on wheat seed
       treated with heptachlor and 14C-Lindane.  J. Econ.
       Entom. 65:1013-1017

-------
296.   Azevedo, J.  A., et.  al. 1965.  Physiological effects   j
       of DDT on pheasants.  Calif. Fish and Game 51:276-293  ;

297.   Lamb, D. W., Linder, R. L.,  and Greichus, Y. A. 1967.
       .Dieldrin residues in eggs and fat of penned pheasant   '
       hens.  Journal of Wildlife Management 31(1):27-27

298.   Dahlgren, R. B., et.  al. 1972.   Residue levels and
       histopathology in pheasants given polychlorinated
       biphenyls.  J. Wildlife Mgmt. 36(2):524-533

299.   Dahlgren, R. B., and Linder, R. L. 1970.  Eggshell
       thickness in pheasants given dieldrin.  Journal of
       Wildlife Management 34(1):226-228

300.   Lamb, D. W.  1969.  Pharmacodynamics of dieldrin-C14
       in pheasants.  Ph.D. Thesis, South Dakota State
       University

301.   Baxter, W. T., Linder, R. L., and Dahlgren, R. B. 1969.
       Dieldrin effects in two generations of penned hen
       pheasants. Journal of Wildlife Management 33(1):96-102

302.   Dahlgren, R. B., et  al. 1972.   Effects of stress on
       pheasants previously given polychlorinated biphenyls.
       J. Wildlife Mgmt. 36(3):974-978

303.   Dahlgren, R. B., Linder, R.  L., and Ortman, K. K.
       1970.  Dieldrin effects on susceptibility of penned
       pheasants to hand capture.  Journal of Wildlife
       Management 34 (4):957-959

304.   Hall, J. E., et. al. 1971.  Effects of aldrin on
       pen-reared pheasants.  J. Wildlife Mgmt. 35(3):429

305.   Linder, R. L., and Dahlgren, R. B. 1970.  Occurrence
       of organochlorine insecticides in pheasants of South
       Dakota.  Pesticides Monitoring Journal 3(4):227-232

306.   Thill, R. E., et  jil»1972.  Effects of aldrin on
       young pheasants unde:: semi-natural conditions.  Env.
       Contain, and Tox. Bull. 7 (2/3) :188-192

307.   Mussehl, T.W., and Schladweiler, P.  1969.  Forest grouse
       and experimental spruce budworm insecticide studies.
       Montana Fish and Game Dept.   Tech. Bull. No, 4

308.   Neill, D.D., et al.  1971.  Pesticide effects on the
       fecundity of the gray partridge.  Bulletin of Environ-
       mental Contamination and Toxicology Vol. 6(6):546-551

-------
309.    Wing.  L.,  et  al.  1944.   Brood  habits  and growth of
       blue grouse.  Auk  61 (3):426-440

310.    Bent,  A.C. 1965.   Life History  of  North American
       Blackbirds,  Orioles,  Tanagers and  Allies.  Dover Publ.
       Inc.,  New York

311.    McEwen, L.C.,  and  Brown/  R.L. 1966.  Acute toxicity
       of dieldrin and malathion to wild  sharp-tailed grouse.
       Journal of Wildlife Management  30(3):604-611

312.    Finley, R. B.  1965.   Adverse effects on birds of
       phosphamidon applied  to a Montana  forest.  Journal of
       Wildlife Management  29(3):580-591

313.    Mussehl, T.  W., and Finley,  R.  B., Jr. 1966.  Residues
       of DDT in forest grouse following  spruce budworm
       spraying.   Journal of Wildlife  Management 30:270

314.    Janda, J., and BQsseova,  M.  1970.   The toxic effect
       of zinc phosphide  baits on partridges  and pheasants.
       Journal of Wildlife  Management  34(1):220-223

315.    Boag, D. A. 1972.   Effect of radio packages on
       behavior of captive  red grouse.  J.  Wildlife Mgmt.
       36:511-518

316.    Brander, R. B. 1968.   A radio-package  harness for
       game birds.  J. Wildlife Mgmt.  32(3):630-632

317.    Evans, S. M., and  Patterson, G. R. 1971.  The•syn-
       chronization of behavior in flocks of  estrildine
       finches.  Anim. Behav. 19:429-438

318.    Moynihan, M., and Hall, M. F.  1953.  Hostile, sexual
       and other social behavior patterns of the spice finch
       (Lonchura punctulata) in captivity.  Behavioral 7:3-74
             ~         /
319.    Jefferies, D. J.  1967.  The delay in ovulation
       produced by pp*-DDT and its possible significance  in
       the field.  Ibis 109(2):266-272

320.    Power, D. 1974.  Museum of Natural History, Santa
       Barbara,  California.   Personal communication

321.   Bent, A.  C., et  al.  1968.  Life history of North
       American  cardinals,  grosbeaks,  bunting,  towhees,
       finches,  sparrows and allies.   Bulletin  237, part 1,
       Smith. Inst., Washington D. C.

-------
322.    Deevey,  E.  S.,  Jr.  1947.   Life tables for natural
       populations of  animals.   Quar. Rev.  Bio.  22:283-314

323.    Jefferies,  D. J.,  and Walker,  C.  H.  1966.  Uptake
       of pp-DDT and its  post-mortem breakdown in the avian
       liver.   Nature  (London)  212:533-534

324.    Oppenheim,  R. W.  1972.  Prehatching  and hatching
       behavior in birds:   a comparative study of altricial
       and precocial species.  Anim.  Behav. 20:644-655

325.    Aschoff, J. Adaptive cycles:   their  significance for
       defining environmental hazards.  Int. Jour, of Bio-
       meterol. 11:255-278

326.    Stickel, L.F.,  and Stickel, Wm.H. 1970.  Distribution
       of DDT residues in tissue of birds in relation to
       mortality,  body condition, and time.  Inter-American
       Conference on Toxicology and Occupational Medicine:
       August 1970, 57-64                                    \

327.    Starr,  R. I., et  al. 1964.  A laboratory method for  i
       evaluating chemicals as bird repellents.   Agr. and
       Food Chem.  12(4):342-344

328.    Benjaminr C.L.  1972. The physiological and histological
       effects of 20,  25-diazacholesterol dihydrochloride
       (SC-12937)  on  the reproduction of the male red-winged
       blackbird  (Agelaius phoeniceus) Ph.D. Thesis, Ohio
       State University

329.    Thompson, R. D.,  and Grant, C. Y. 1968. Nutritive
       value of two laboratory diets for starlings.  Lab.
       An. Care 18(1):75-79

330.    Bent, A. C. 1964.   Life History of North American
       Nuthatchers, Wrens, Thrashes and their Allies.  Dover
       Publ. Inc., New York

331.    Summers-Smith,  0.  1963.  The House Sparrow.  Collins,
       London, xvi •+  x69

332.    Jackson, William B. 1952.  Populations of the wood
       mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) subjected to the appli-
       cations of DDT  and parathion.  Ecological Monographs
       22(4):259-281

333.    Mehner, J. F.,  and Wallace, G. J. 1959.  Robin pop-
       ulations and insecticides.  Atl. Naturalist 14:4-9

-------
334.    Wtirster,  D.H.  et.al.  1965.   Bird  mortality following
       DDT spray for  Dutch  elm disease.   Ecology 46(4):488-
       499

335.    Bernard,  R.  F.  1963.   Studies  on  the effects of DDT on
       birds.   Michigan State University Mus.  Bio.  Series
       2(3):155-192

336.    Barker, R.  J.  1958.   Notes  on  some ecological effects
       of DDT sprayed on elms.   Journal  of Wildlife Manage-
       ment 22:269-274

337.    Johnson,  E.  V.  1969.   Robin-pesticide ecology on a
       commercial fruit farm.  Ph.D.  Thesis, Cornell
       University,  Ithaca,  New York

338.    Hunt,  L.  B., and Sacho,  R.  J.  1969.  Response of robins
       to DDT and methoxychlor. Journal of Wildlife Manage-
       ment 33(2):336-345

339.    Snyder, D.  B.  1961.   Strychnine as a potential control
       for red-winged blackbirds.   Journal of Wildlife
       Management 25(l):96-99

340.    Van Velzen, A.  C., et_ aJL.  1972.   Lethal mobilization
       of DDT by cowbirds.   J.  Wildlife  Mgmt.  36:733-739

341.    Stickel,  L.  F. , and Stickel, W. H. 1966.  Residues of
       DDT in brains  and bodies of birds that died on dosage
       and in survivors.  Science  151:1549-1551

342.    Harvey, J.  M.  1967.   Excretion of DDT by migratory
       birds.  Can. J. Zoo.  45:629-633

343.    Mitchell, C. J. , and Hayes, R. 0. 1973.  Breeding
       house sparrows, Passer domesticus, in captivity.
       Ornithol. Monographs 14:39-48

344.    Kessel, B.  1957.  A study of the breeding biology of
       the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris L.) in North
       America.   The Am. Midland Naturalist 58(2):257-331

345.    Anderson, T. R. 1973.  A comparative ecological study
       of the house sparrow and the European tree sparrow
       near Portage des Sioux, Michigan.  Uni. Micro. Inc.,
       Ann Arbor, Michigan, 148

346.    Will, R.  1969.  Fecundity,  density, and movements of
       a house sparrow population in Southern Illinois.  Uni.
       Micro. Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan

-------
347.   Schafer, E.  W. 1972.  The acute oral toxicity of 369  \
       pesticidal,  pharmaceutical and other chemicals to wild
       birds.   Tox. and App. Phar. 21:315-330

348.   Morris, R.  D. 1968.  Effects of endrin feeding on     ;
       survival and reproduction in the deer mouse, 'Peromyscus;
       maniculatus.  Can. J. Zoo. 46:951-958                 ;

349.   DeGrazio, J. W., et  al. 1971.  Use of 4-aminopyridine
       to protect ripening corn from blackbirds.  Journal of
       Wildlife Management 35 (3):565-569

350.   Flick,-,  D. -P., O'Dell, R. G. , and Childs, V. A. 1965.
       Studies of chicken edema disease.  Poultry Science
       44(6):1460-1465

351.   Katz,  D. 1969.  A restrainer for simplifying cardiac
       blood collection from chickens.  Lab. An. Care 19:
       869-870                                               ..;

352.   Zimmerman, R. 1974.  Ralston Purina, St. Louis, Mo.,
       Personal Communication

353.   Hughes, B.  O., and Wood-Gush, D.G.M. 1971. A specific
       appetite for calcium in domestic chickens.  Anim.
       Behav.  19:490-499                                     \<

354.   Dilger, W.  C. 1969.  Caging and environment, Chapter
       2 in:  Diseases of Cage and Aviary Birds, ed. by M.
       Petrak.  Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger

355.   McLaughlin,  J., Jr., et  al. 1963.  The injection of
       chemicals into the yolk sac of fertile eggs prior to
       incubation as a toxicity test.  Tox. and App. Phar.
       5:760-771

356.   Walker, N.  E. 1967.  Distribution of chemicals injected
       into fertile eggs and its effect upon apparent toxicity
       Tox. and App. Phar. 10:290-299

357.   Cain,  J. R., et  al. 1967.  Heart rate of the develop-
       ing chick embryo.  Proc. Soc. Exp. Bio. Med. 126:
       507-510

358.   Battista, S.P., Denine, E.P., and Kensler, C.J.  1972.
       Restoration of tracheal mucosa and ciliary particle
       transport activity after mechanical denudation in
       the chicken.  Tox. and App. Phar. 22:59-69

-------
359.    Battista,  S.P.  and Kensler,  C.J.   1970.   Use of the
       nonimmersed in  vitro chicken tracheal preparation for
       the study  of ciliary transport activity.   Arch. Env.
       Health 20:318-325

360.    Greenberg, J.,  and LaHam,  Q.N. 1970.   Reversal of
       raalathion-induced teratisms  and its biochemical
       implications in tha developing chicks.  Can. J. Zoo.
       48:1047-1053

361.    Walker, N. E.  1971.  The effect of malathion and
       malaoxon on esterases and gross development of the
       chick embryo.   Tox. and. App. Phar. 19:590-601

362.    Cecil, H.  C. ,  et.  al. 1974.   Embryotoxic and terato-
       genic effects in unhatched fertile eggs from hens fea
       PCB.  Bulletin Envir. Contain. 11(6)

363.    Gilani, S. H.  1973.  Cardiovascular malformations in
       the chick embryo induced by  thalidomide.   Tox. and
       App. Phar. 25:77-83

364.    Miyazaki,  S.,  and Hodgson, G. C.  1972.  Chronic
       toxicity of Dursban and its  metabolite, 3, 5, 6-
       Trichloro-2-pyridinol in chickens.  Tox.  and App.
       Phar. 23:391-398

365.    Messier, P. E.  1973.  Effects of LSD on the develop-
       ment, histology and fine structure of the chick em-
       bryo.  Tox. and App. Phar. 25:54-59

366.    Pagnini, G., et  al. 1972.  Comparative evaluation of
       the influence of some tetracyclines on chick embryo.
       Tox. and App.  Phar. 22:427-431

367.    Landauer,  W. 1953.  On teratogenic effects of pilo-
       carpin in chick development.  J. Exp. Zoo. 122(3):
       469-483

368.    Naber, E.  C., and Ware, G. W. 1965.  Effect of kepone
       and mirex on reproductive performance in the laying
       hen.  Poultry Science 44:878-880

369.    Lillie, R. J., et. al. 1974.  Normal reproductive
       performance of mature cockerels fed Aroclor 1248.
       Poultry Sci. 53{4):1-10

370.    Lillie, R. J., e_t  al. 1974.  Differences in response
       of caged white leghorn layers to various polychlori-
       nated biphenyls  (PCBs) in the diet.  Poultry Sci.
       53:726-732

-------
371.   Lillie,  R.  J.  ejt  al.  1973.  Methoxychlor in chicken
       breeder  diets.  Poultry Sci. 52 (3):1134-1138          j

372.   Whitehead,  C.  C.,  and Pettigrew,  R.  J. 1972.  The
       subacute toxicity of 2,4-dichlorophenoryacetic acid   I
       and 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid to chicks.
       Tox. and App.  Phar.  21:348-354                        !

373.   Greenberg,  J., and LaHam, Q. N. 1969.  Malathion-
       induced  teratisms in the developing chick.  Can.
       J. Zoo.  47(4) :539-542

374.   Ecobichon,  D.  J.,  and Saschenbrecker, P. W. 1969.
       The redistribution of stored DDT in cockerels under
       the influence of food deprivation.   Tox. and App.
       Phar. 15(2) -.420-432

375.   Bossen,  E.  H., et  al. 1972.  The effects of chloro-
       quine on chick skeletal muscle in vitro.  Tox. and
       App. Phar.  24:197-205

376.   Kasuya,  M.  1972.  Effects of inorganic, aryl, alkyl
       and other mercury compounds on the outgrowth of cells
       and fibers from dorsal root ganglia in tissue culture.
       Tox. and App:.  Phar.  23:136-146

377.   Paulson, G.  D. 1969.  An improved method for separate
       collection of urine, feces and expiratory gases from
       the mature chicken.   Poultry Science 48:1331-1336

378.   Rogallo, V.  L., et  al. 1968.  A piezoelectric
       transducer for measuring cardiac and gross motor
       activity of small organisms.  NASA Tech. Note D-4590

379.   Padgett, C.A., and Ivey,W.D. 1959.   Coturnix quail as
       a laboratory research animal.  Science 129:267-268

380.   Kreitzer, J. F., Heinz, G. H. 1974.   The effect of
       sublethal dosages of five pesticides and a poly-
       chlorinated biphenyl on the avoidance response of
       Coturnix quail chicks.  Envir. Poll. 6:21-29

381.   Haegele, M.  A. 1974.  Denver Wildlife Research Center,
       Fed. Cen. Bldg. 16,  Denver, Colorado, Personal
       Communication

382.   Cecil, H. C. 1971.  Effects of dietary p,p"-DDE on
       egg production and eggshell characteristics of Japanese
       quail receiving on adequate calcium diet.  Poultry
       Sci. 50:657-659

-------
384.    Cecil,  H.  C.,  et  al.  1973.   Effects of different
       classes of pesticides  on pentobarbital anesthesia and
       toxicity in Japanese quail.   Agr.  Food Chem.  21(1):
       114-117

385.    McFarland, L.  Z.,  and  Lacy,  D.B.  1969.  Physiologic
       and endocrinologic effects of the  insecticide kepone
       in Japanese quail.  Tox. and App.  Phar. 15:441-450

386.    Gillett, J. W.,  et  al.  1966.  Interactions between
       DDT analogs and  mTcrosomal epoxidase systems.  J.
       Agr. Food Chem.  14(6):540-545

387.    Annau,  E.  A.,  et  al.  1952.   Biochemical and histo-
       logical changes  in the liver of mice following feeding
       of the  insecticide aldrin.  Can.  J.  Med. Sci. 30(6):
       463-470

388.    Peakall, D. B.,  and Lincer,  J.  L.  1972.  Methyl mer-
     '  cury: its  effect on eggshell thickness.  Bulletin
       Envir.  Contain.  Tox 8:89-90

389.    Bitman, J., et  al. 1970.  DDT-induced inhibition of
       avian shell gland carbonic anhydrase: a mechanism
       for thin eggshells.  Science 168:594-596

390.    Bunyan, P. J.,  Davidson, J., and Shorthill, M. J.
       1970.  Hepatic glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and
       6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase levels in Japanese
       quail following the ingestion of p,p'DDT and related
       compounds.  Chem.  Bio. Interac. 2:175-182

391.    Sell, J. L., et  al. 1972.  Decreased aniline hydrox-
       lase activity~Tn Japanese quail due to dietary DDT.
       J. Agr. Food Chem. 20(3):553-557

392.    Bitman, J., et  al. 1969.  DDT induces a decrease in
       eggshell calcium.   Nature 224:44-46

393.    Bitman, J., et  al. 1971.  Comparison of DDT effect on
       pentobarbital metabolism in rats and quail.  J. Agr.
       Chem. 19(2):333-338

394.    Poonacha, K. B.  1972.   Studies of genetic resistance
       to DDT and effects of environmental stress in the
       Japanese quail  (Coturnix coturnix j apanica) fed a diet
       containing DDT.   Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Wisconsin

395.    Creger, C. R., and Kubena, L. F. 1971.  Lipotropic
       agents and DDT residue in birds and eggs.  Env.
       Contain, and Tox. Bull. 6(5):453-459

-------
396.   Call, D.  J.  1972.   Effects of dieldrin and selected   i j
       polychlorinated biphenyls upon Japanese quail.   Ph.D.  h
       Thesis, University of South Dakota                    •]
                                                             I i
397.   Stickel, -W.  H., et  al.  1969.  Residues of dieldrin   U
       in relation  to mortalTty in birds and mammals.   Chap.  ; \
       8:174-204  in:   Chemical Fallout, Current Research on   j
       Persistent Pesticides, ed. by M. W.  Miller and G.GT   '
       Berg, Charles  C. Thomas, Publisher,  Springfield, 111.

398.   Cecil, H.  C. 1972.  Effects of a single oral injection
       of polychlorinated biphenyls and terphenyls and a
       polybrominated biphenyl on pentobarbital sleeping
       times of Japanese quail.  165th ACS  Meeting Dallas,
       Texas

399.   Vos,  J. G. ,  et  al. 1971.  Toxicity  of hexachloro-    '••
       benzene in Japanese quail with special reference to   [
       porphyria, liver damage, reproduction and tissue
       residues.  Tox. and App. Phar. 18:944-957

400.   Shellenberger, T.  E., et  al. 1966.   Cholinesterase   ;
       inhibition and toxicologic evaluation of two organo-
       phosphate pesticides in Japanese quail.  Tox. and     \
       App.  Phar. 8:22-28                                    i

401.   Hitchcock, M., and Murphy, J. D. 1971.  Activation of
       parathion and guthion by mammalian,  avian and piscine
       liver Homogenates and cell fractions.  Tox. and App.
       Phar. 19:37-45                                        \

402.   Wentworth, B.  C.,  et. al. 1968.  Sterility induced in
       Japanese quail by spray treatment of eggs with mestranol
       Journal of Wildlife Management 32 (4):879-887

403.   Cecil, H.  C. 1973.  Effects of different classes of
       pesticides on pentobarbital anesthesia and toxicity
       in Japanese  quail.  J. Agr. Food Chem. Vol. 21(1)

404.   Cecil, H.  C.,  et  al. 1974.  Effects of nonpersistent
       pesticides on iTver weight, lipids and vitamin A of
       rats  and quail.  Bulletin Envir. Contam. 11(6)

405.   Cecil, H.  C.,  et  al. 1973.  Polychlorinated biphenyl-
       induced decrease in liver vitamin A in Japanese quail
       and rats.  Bulletin Envir. Contam. Tox. 9(3):179-185

406.   Schafer,   E. D., 1974.  Denver Wildlife Research
       Center, Personal Communication

-------
407.   Shellenberger,  T.  E.  1968.   Biological studies
       utilizing Japanese quail.   Lab.  An.  Care 18(2):244-250

408.   Dilger, W. C.  1969.  Common types of cage birds,
       Chapter 1 in:  Diseases of  Cage and Aviary Birds, ed.
       by M. Petrak.   Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger

409.   Dilger, W. C.  1969.  Behavioral aspects, Chapter 3 in:
       Diseases of Cage and  Aviary Birds, ed. by M.  Petrak,
       Philadelphia,  Lea & Febiger

410.   Tollefson, C.  I. 1969.  Nutrition, Chapter 7 in:
       Diseases of Cage and  Aviary Birds, ed. by M.  Petrak.
       Philadelphia,  Lea & Febiger

411.   Crandall, L. S. 1964.  Family Soricidae, Family
       Talpidae, Family Tupaiidae, pp.  49-55 in: Management
       of Wild Mammals in Captivity^  University of Chicago
       Press, Chicago, Illinois

412.   Burt, W. H., and Grossenheider, R. P. 1964.  A Field
       Guide to the Mammals, 2nd ed. Houghton Mifflin Co.,
       Boston

413.   Hamilton, W. J. , Jr.  1929.   Breeding habits of the
       short-tailed shrew, Blarina brevicauda.  J. Mamm.
       10:125-134

414.   Dapson, R. W.  1968.  Reproduction and age structure
       in a population of short-tailed shrews.  J. Mamm.
       49(2):205-214

415.   Blair, W. F. 1940. Notes on home ranges and popu-
       lations of the short-tailed shrew.  Ecology 21(2):
       284-288

416.   Rood, J. P. 1958.  Habits of the short-tailed shrew in
       captivity.  J. Mamm.  39:499-507

417.   Blus, L. J. 1971.  Reproduction and survival  of short-
       tailed shrews in captivity.  Lab. An. Sci. 21(6):884-
       891

418.   Mann, P. M. 1956.  Keeping short-tailed shrews in
       captivity.  J. Mamm.  37(2):274-275

419.   Doremus, H. M. 1965.   Heart rate, temperature and
       respiration rate of the short-tailed shrew in cap-
       tivity.  J. Mamm.  46(3):424-425

-------
420.   Whitaker, J. O.,  Jr., and Ferraro, M. G. 1963.
       Summer food of 220 short-tailed shrews from Ithaca,
       N. Y.  J. Mamm.  44:419

421.   Pearson, 0. P. 1950.  Keeping shrews in captivity.
       J. Mamm.31(3):351-352

422.   Hamilton, W. J.,  Jr. 1949.  The reproductive rates of
       some small mammals.  J. Mamm. 30 (3):257-260

423.   Pearson, O. P. 1944.  Reproduction in the shrew
       (Blarina brevicauda)  An. J. of Anat. 75:39-80

424.   Burt, W. H. 1940.  Territorial behavior and popula-
       tions of some small mammals in southern Michigan.
       Mus. Zoo. University of Michigan 45:7-58

425.   Williamson, P. and Evans, P. R. 1972.  Lead: levels
       in roadside invertebrates and small mammals.  Bull.
       Envir. Contain. Tox. 8:280-288

426.   Rasweiler, J. J., IV, and De Bonilla, H. 1972.
       Laboratory maintenance methods for some nectarivorous
       and frugivorous Phyllostomatid bats.  Lab. An. Sci.
       22(5):658-663

427.   Constantine, D.  G. 1952.  A program for maintaining
       the free-tail bat in captivity.  J. Mamm. 33 (3):395-
       397

428.   Mohos, S. C. 1961.  Bats as laboratory animals.
       Anatom. Rec. 139:369-377

429.   Gates, W. H. 1936.  Keeping bats in captivity.  J.
       Mamm. 17(3) -.268-273

430.   Novick, A. 1960.   Successful breeding in captive
       Artibeus.  J. Mamm. 41(4):508-509

431.   Orr, R. T. 1958.   Keeping bats in captivity.  J. Mamm.
       39(3):339-344

432.   Wimsatt, W. A.,  and Guerriere, A. 1961.  Care and
       maintenance of the common vampire in captivity.
       J. Mamm. 42 (4):449-454

433.   Crandall, L. S.  1964.  Order Chiroptera, pp. 59-65
       in:  Management of Wild Mammals in Captivity.
       University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois

-------
434.   Rasweiler,  J.  J.  1974.   Personal  communication.  Dept.
       of Anatomy, Columbia University,  New York,  N.  Y.

435.   Pearson, 0. P.,  et  al.  1952.   Reproduction of the
       lump-nosed  bat (Corynorhinus rafinesquei)  in
       California.  J.  Mamm.  33(3) .-273-320

436.   Racey, P. A.  1972.  Bats.   The U.F.A.W.  Handbook on
       The Care and Management  of Laboratory Animals, ed
       U.F.A.W. staff,  Churchill  Livingstone, Edinburgh
       and London

437.   Tamar, H. 1961.   Taste reception  in the opossum and
       the bat. Physiol. Zoology.  34:86-91

438.   Luckens, M. M.,  and Davis, W.  H.  1964.  Bats:
       sensivity to DDT.  Science 146:948

439.   Harris, P.  D., et  al. 1969.  Effects of ethyl alcohol
       on subcutaneous microcirculation.  Tox.  and App. Phar.
       14:6-12

440.   Matthews, L.  H.  1956.  Breeding hares in captivity.
       Proc. Zoo.  Soc.   (London)

441.   Crandall, L.  S.  1964.  Order Lagomorpha, pp. 201-205
       in:  Management of Wild  Mammals in Captivity.
       University  of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois

442.   Obeck, D. K.  1973.  A collapsible apparatus for
       cardiac bleeding of rabbits.  Lab. An. Sci. 23(2):
       276-278

443.   Schwartz, C.  W. , and Schwartz, E. R. 1964.   The Wild
       Mammals of  Missouri, 2nd ed.  University of Missouri
       Press

444.   Fox, R. R., and Guthrie, D. 1968.  The value of creep
       feed for laboratory rabbits.  Lab. An. Care 18(1):
       34-38

445.   Treon, J. F., and Cleveland, F. P. 1955.  Toxicity of
       certain chlorinated hydrocarbon insecticides for
       laboratory  animals, with special  reference to aldrin
       and dieldrin.  Agr. and  Food Chem. 3(5):402-408

446.   Vos, J. G., and Beems, R.  B. 1971.  Dermal toxicity
       studies of  technical polychlorinated biphenyls  and
       fractions thereof in rabbits.  Tox. and App. Phar.
       19:617-633

-------
447.   Weil, C. S. 1971.  Correlation of 4-hour vs. 24-hour
       contact skin penetration...formulation.  Tox. and     !
       App. Phar. 18:734-742                                 ;

448.   Antonides, H. J. 1962.  Toxicologic studies on armazide.
       Tox. and App. Phar. 4:44-54

449.   Roudabush, R. L., et  al. 1965.  Comparative acute
       effects of some chemicals on the skin of rabits and
       guinea pigs.  Tox. and App. Phar. 7:559-565

450.   Guess, W. L. 1970.  Tissue reaction to 2-chlorethanol
       in rabbits.  Tox. and App. Phar. 16:382-390

451.   McElligott, T. F. 1972.  The dermal toxicity of
       paraquat:  differences due to techniques of application.
       Tox. and App. Phar. 21:361-368                        j

452.   Allen, S. H. 1968.  A thesis presented to the faculty
       of the graduate school, University of Missouri
       Department of Zoology Co-op Wildlife Res. Unit

453.   Crandall, L. S. 1964.  Order Rodentia, pp. 207-268
       in:  Management of Wild Mammals in Captivity.
       University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois        ;

454. y Haley, T. J., 1964.  Experimental usefulness of the   i
       kangaroo rat.  Lab An. Care 14(2):95-102

455.   Chew, R. M. 1958.  Reproduction by Dipodomys merriami
       in captivity.  J. Marnm. 39 (4) : 597-591}

456.   Gisler, D. B., e_t  al. 1964.  The use of Perognathus
       flavus in research.  Lab. An. Care 14(4):283-286

457.   Bartholomew, G. A., and Cade, T. J. 1957.  Temperature
       regulation, hibernation, and aestivation in the little
       pocket mouse, Perognathus longimerobris.  J. Mamm.
       38:60-71

458.   Butterworth, B. B. 1961.  The breeding of Dipodomys
       deserti in the laboratory.  J. Mamm. 43(3):413-414

459.   Day, B. N., et  al. 1956.  Ord kangaroo rat in
       captivity.  Science 124:485-486

460.   Schroeder, M. H. 1966.  Gophacide, a candidate for
       control of Ord's kangaroo rat.  Journal of Wildlife   ;
       Management 30:339-341

-------
461.    Davis, D.  H.  S.,  and Oettle,  A.  G.  1958.   The multi-
       mamma te mouse Mastomys natalensis Smith:  a laboratory-
       adopted African wild rodent.   Proc.  Zoo.  Soc. Lond.
       131-293-299

462.    Marsh R. E. 1968.   A colony nest box for rearing wild
       rats.  Lab. An. Care 18(6):639-641

463.    Meyer, B.  J. , and Meyer,  R. K.  1944.   Growth and
       reproduction of the cotton rat,  Sigmodon hispidus
       hispidus under laboratory conditions.   J. Mamm. 25(2)

464.    Hamilton,  W.  J. ,  Jr. 1953.   Reproduction and young of
       the Florida wood  rat, Neotoma floridana floridana.
       J. Mamm. 34(2):180

465.    Svihla, A., and Svihla, R.  D. 1933.   Notes on the life
       history of the woodrat, Neotoma floridana rubida
       Bangs.  J. Mamm.  14:73-75

466.    Underhill, A. 1973.  Use.of neotropical rodents in
       protein efficiency studies.  Lab. An.  Sci. 23(4):
       499-503

467.    Conaway, C. H.  1954.  The reproductive cycle of rice
       rats  (Oryzomys palustris palustris)  in captivity.
       J. Mamm. 35:263-266

468.    Svihla, A. 1931.   Life history of the Texas rice rat
       (Oryzomys palustris texensis).  J. Mamm. 12:238-242

469.    Hamilton,  W.  J. ,  Jr. 1946.  Habits of the swamp rice
       rat, Qryzomys palustris palustris.  Am. Midland Nat.
       36:730-736

470.    Svihla, A. 1929.   General notes on Sigmodon hispidus
       hispidus.   J. Mamm. 10:352-353

471.    Egoscue, H. J.  1957.  The desert woodrat:  a labora-
       tory colony.   J.  Mamm. 38(4):477-481

472.    Wood, F. D. 1935.  Notes on the breeding behavior  and
       fertility of Neotoma fuscipes macrotis in captivity.
       J. Mamm. 16(2):105-109 .

473.    Chamberlain, E.  B. 1928.  The Florida wood rat in
       South Carolina.   J. Mamm. 9:152-153

-------
474.   Lay, D.  W.,  and Baker, R. H. 1938.  Notes on the home
       range and ecology of the Attwater wood rat.  J. Mamm.
       19:418-423

475.   Kennelly, J. J. et  al. 1970.  Laboratory studies of
       the effect of U-5897 on the reproduction of wild male
       rats.  Journal of Wildlife Management 34 (3) :508-513

476.   Durham,  W.  F., and Williams, C. H. 1972.  Mutagenic,
       teratogenic and carcinogenic properties of pesticides.
       Ann. Rev. of Entomol.  (1972):123

477.   Brooks,  J.  E., and Bowerman, A. M. 1971.  Estrogenic
       steroid used to inhibit reproduction in wild Norway
       rats.  Journal of Wildlife Management 35(3):444-449

478.   Gwynn, G. W., and Kurtz, S. M.  1970.  Acceptability
       and efficacy of an antifertility agent in wild Norway
       rats.  Journal of Wildlife Management 34(3):514-519

479.   Marsh, R. E., and Howard, W. E. 1969.  Evaluation of
       mestranol as a reproductive inhibitor of Norway rats
       in garbage dumps.  Journal of Wildlife Management
       33(1):133-138

480.   Musacchia, X. J. 1954.  Cannibalism and other
       observations of captive ground squirrels.  J. Mann.
       35(3):445-447

481.   Marsh, R. E., and Howard, W. E. 1971.  Care of ground
       squirrels (Spermophilus sp.) in captivity.  Lab.
       Animal Sci.  21(3):367-371

482.   Lyman, C. P. 1954.  Activity, food consumption and
       hoarding in hibernators.  J. Mamm. 35(4):399-406

483.   Blair, W. F. 1942.  Rate of development of young
       spotted ground squirrels.  J. Mamm. 23:342-343

484.   Selle, R. M. 1939.  Golden-mantled ground  squirrels
       raised in captivity.  J. Mamm. 20(1):106-109

485.   Ross, R. C.  1930.  California Sciuridae  in captivity.
       J. Mamm. ll(l):76-78

486.   Colvin, H. W., Jr., Skaife, D. D., and Morrison, J.T.
       1971.  Liver and fecal bishydroxycoumarin  following
       repeated toxic oral bishydroxycoumarin administration
       in ground squirrels.  Tox. and App. Phar.  19:155-163

-------
487.   Panuska, J.  A.,  and Wade,  N.  A.  1957.   Field Observa-
       tions on Tamias  striatus in Wisconsin.   J.  Mamm.
       38(2):192-196

488.   Forbes, R.  B. 1967.  Some aspects of the water econo-
       mics of two species of chipmunks.  J.  Mairan. 48(3):
       466-468

489.   Baumgras, P. 1944.   Experimental feeding of captive
       fox squirrels.  J.  Wildlife Mgmt. 8(4):296-300

490.   Condrin, J.  M. 1963.  Observations on the seasonal and
       reproductive activities of the eastern chipmunk.
       J. Mamm. 17:231-234

491.   Schooley, J. P.  1934.  A summer breeding season in the
       eastern chipmunk.  Tamias striatus.  J. Mamm. 15:194-
       196

492.   Blair, W.F.  1947.  Size of home range and notes on the
       life history of the woodland  deer mouse and eastern
       chipmunk in northern Michigan.  J. Mamm. 23:27-36

493.   Ranson, R.  M. 1941.  Prenatal and infant mortality in
       a laboratory population of voles.  Proc. Zool. Soc.
       3:46-57

494.   Dice, L. R.  1929.  A new laboratory cage for small
       mammals, with notes on methods of rearing Peromyscus.
       J. Mamm. 10(2):116-124

495.   Gier, H.T.  1967. Microtus ochrogaster in the laboratory
       Trans. Kan.  Acad. Sci. 70(2):256-265

496.   Richmond, M. 1969.   Management, breeding, and repro-
       ductive performance of the vole, Microtus ophrogaster,
       in a laboratory colony.  Lab. An. Care 19 (1") : 80-87

497.   Egoscue, H. J. 1960.  Laboratory and field studies of
       the northern grasshopper mouse.  J. Mamm. 41(1):99-110

498.   Louch C. D. 1956.  Adrenocortical activity in relation
       to the density and dynamics of three confined popula-
       tions of Microtus pennsylvanicus.  Ecology 37(4):701-
       713

499.   Storm, G. L., and Sanderson,  G. C. 1968.  Housing and
       reproductive performance of an outdoor colony of
       voles.  J.  Mamm. 49(2):322-324

-------
500.   Poiley, S. M. 1949.   Raising captive meadow moles     !
       (Microtus pennsylvanicus pennsylvanicus).  J. Mamm.   I
       30(3):317-318                                         j

501.   Selle, R. M. 1928.  Microtus californicus in captivity
       J. Mamm. 9(2):93-98                                   \

502.   Quiring, D.  P.  1951.  A comparison between Microtus   <
       drummondi (Aud. and Bach.) and Microtus pennsylvanicus.
       Growth 15:101-120

503.   Cowan, I. M., and Arsenault, M. G. 1954.  Reproduction
       and growth in the creeping vole, Microtus oregoni
       serpens Merriam. Can. J. Zoo. 32:198-208

504.   Benton, A. H. 1955.   Observations on the life history
       of the northern pine mouse.  J. Mamm. 36(l):52-62

505.   Christian, J. J. and Davis, D. E. 1966.  Adrenal glands
       in female voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) as related to
       reproduction and population size.  J. Mamm. 47(1):1-18

506.   Morris, R. D. 1969.   Effects of endrin on small mammal
       populations.  Ph.D.  Thesis, University of Saskatchewan

507.   Webb, R. E., and Horsfall, F. 1967.  Endrin resistance
       in the pine mouse.  Science 156:1762

508.   Libby, J. L., and Abrams, J. 1966.  Anticoagulant
       rodenticides in paper tubes for control of meadow mice.
       Journal of Wildlife Management 30(3):512-518

509.   Marsh, R. E., et  al. 1967.  Laboratory tests on the
       effectiveness of prolin mouse tubes.  Journal of
       Wildlife Management 31(2) .-342-344

510.   Pournelle, G. H. 1952.  Reproduction and early post-
       natal development of the cotton mouse,  (Peromyscus
       gossypinus gossypinus).  J. Mamm. 33(1):1-20

511.   Nicholson, A. J. 1941.  The homes and social habits
       of the wood mouser  (Peromycus leucopus noveboracensis).
       Am. Midland Nat. 25:196-223

512.   Layne, J. N. 1966.  Postnatal development and growth
       of Peromyscus floridanus.  Growth 30:23-45

513.   Dice, L. R.  1934.  An improved Peromyscus ration.
       J. Mamm. 15(2):160-161

-------
514.   Clark, F.  H.  1939.   Age of sexual maturity in mice of
       Genus Peromyscus.   J.  Mamm.  19:230-234

515.   Tiner, J.  1953.  Fatalities  in rodents caused by
       larval Ascaris in  the  central nervous system.  J. Mamm.
       34(2):153-167

516.   Goodpaster,  W.W.,  and  Hoffmeister, D.F.  1954.  Life
       history of the golden  mouse, Peromyscus  nuttalli, in
       Kentucky,   J. Mamm. 35(l):16-27

517.   Morris, R.D.  1970.   The effects of endrin on Microtus
       and Peromyscus.  I. Unenclosed field populations.
       Can. J. Zoo.  48(4):695-708

518.   Tevis, L., Jr. 1956.  Behavior of a population of
       forest mice when subjected to poison.  J. Mamm.
       34(3):358-370

519.   Ozburn,G.W.,  and Morrison,F.O. 1964.  The selection
       of a DDT-tolerant  strain of  mice and some character-
       istics of  that strain.  Can. J. Zoo. 42:519-526

520.   Yen, H. C. Y., e_t  al.  1970.   Effects of  various drugs
       on 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DL-DOPA)-induced
       excitation (agressive" behavior)in mice.   Tox. and
       App. Phar. 17:597-604

521.   Murakami,  H.  1971.   Differences between internal and
       external environments  of the mouse cage.  Lab. An.
       Sci. 21(5):680-684

522.   Huber, J.  J.  1965.   Some physiological effects of the
       insecticide kepone in  the laboratory mouse.  Tox. and
       App. Phar. 7:516-524

523.   Johnston,  R.  F.  and Rudd, R. L. 1957.  Breeding of the
     •  salt marsh shrew'.   J.  of Mammalogy 38:157-163

524.   Port, C. D.,  and Kaltenback, J. P. 1969.  The effect
       of corncob bedding on  reproductivity and leucine
       incorporation in mice.  Lab. An. Care 19:46-49

525.   Ferguson,  H.  C.  1966.   Effect of red cedar bedding on
       hexobarbital and pentobarbital sleep time.  J. Pharm.
       Sci. 55:1142-1143

526.   Vessell, E.  S. 1967.  Induction of drug-metabolizing
       enzymes in liver microsomes of mice and rats by
       softwood bedding.   Sci. 157:1057-1058

-------
527.   Pick, J. R.,  and Little, J.  M.  1965.  Effect of type
       of bedding material on thresholds of pentylenetetrazol
       convulsions in mice.  Lab. An.  Care 15(l):29-33

528.   Spalding,J.F., et al.  1969.   Influence of the visible
       color spectrum on activity in mice.  Lab. An. Care.
       19(1) :50-53

529.   Spalding,J.F., et al.  1969.   Influence of the visible
       color spectrum on activity in mice II.  Influence of
       sex, color,  and age on activity.  Lab. An. Care
       19(2):209-213

530.   Iturrian, W.  B., and Fink, G. B. 1968.  Effect of
       noise in the  animal house on seizure susceptibility
       and growth of mice.  Lab. An. Care 18(5):557-560

531.   Welch, J. G.  1968.   Effect of intermittent feeding on
       body composition of mice.  Lab. An. Care 18 (6):596-601

532.   Weltman, A.  S., et  al. 1968.  Effects of isolation
       stress on female albino mice.  Lab. An. Care 18:426-
       435

533.   Palmes, E. D. and Del Pup, J. 1971.  Procedure for the
       maintenance of stable laboratory mouse populations.
       Lab. An. Sci. 21(6):932-936

534.   Smith, P. C., et  al.  1968.   Intestinal obstruction
       and death in suckling rats due to sawdust bedding.
       Lab. An. Care 18(2):224-228

535.   Winter, C. A., and Flataker, L. 1962.  Cage design as
       a factor influencing acute toxicity of respiratory
       depressant drugs,in rats.  Tox. and App.  Phar. 4:650-
       655

536.   Saunders, D.  R., et  al. 1972.   Chlorpromazine-ultra-
       violet interaction on mouse ear.  Tox. and App. Phar.
       21:260-264

537.   Klaassen, C.  D. 1973.   Comparison of the toxicity of
       chemicals in newborn rats to bile duct-ligated and
       sham-operated rats and mice.  Tox. and App. Phar.
       24:37-44

538.   Budreau, C.  H., and Singh, R. P. 1972.  Teratogenicity
       and embryotoxicity of demeton and fenthion in CFfl
       mouse embryos.  Tox. and App. Phar. 24:324-332

-------
539.   Ewing, K.  L. ,  and Tauber,  0.  E.  1964.   Blood chemistry
       changes in mice fed high levels  of polyoxyethylene
       sorbitan derivatives.   Tox. and  App. Phar. 6(1964):
       442-446

540.   Bruce, D.  W.,  et  al.  1963.  The acute mammalian
       toxicity of rare earth nitrates  and oxides.  Tox. and
       App. Phar. 5:750-579

541.   Epstein, S. S., et  al. 1972. Detection of chemical
       mutagens by the dominant lethal  assay in the mouse.
       Tox. and App.  Phar. 23 (1972):288-325

542.   Morello, N.,  and Nicholas, J. 1969.  A plastic food
       tube for accurately dispensing powdered diets to mice.
       Lab. An. Care 19(1):406-407

543.   Wood, J. D. 1971.   The influence of feeding frequency
       upon several aspects of the growth of rats.  Ph.D.
       Thesis, Cornell University

544.   Kraft, L.  M. ,  e_fc_  aj..  1964.  Practical control of
       diarrheal disease in a commercial mouse colony.  Lab.
       An. Care 14:16-19

545*.   Goldenthal, E. I.  1971.  A compilation of LDso values
       in newborn and adult animals.  Tox. and App. Phar.
       18:185-207

546.   Cook, L.,  and Kelleher, R. T. 1963.  Effects of drugs
       on behavior.   Ann. Rev. of Phar. 3:205

547.   Brady, J.  V.  1956.  Comparative  approach to the
       evaluation of drug effects upon  affective behavior.
       Ann. N.Y.  Acad. Sci. 64:632-643

548.   Grizzell,  R.  A., Jr. 1955.  A study of the southern
       woodchuck, Marmota monax monax.   Am. Midland Nat.
       53(2):257-293

549.   Shadle, A. R.  1950.  Feeding, care, and handling of
       captive porcupines (Erethizon).   J. Mamm. 31(4):
       411-416

550.   Davis, R.  A.  and Shillito, E. 1967.  The coypu or
       nutria.  The U.F.A.W.  Handbook on the Care and
       Management of Lab Animals.Chapter 27:457-467.
       Ed. U.F.A.W. staff.  E. S. Livingstone, Ltd.,
       Edinburgh and Scotland.

-------
551.   Twichell, A. R. 1939.  Notes on the southern woodchuckj
       in Missouri.  J. Mamm. 20:71-74                       |

552.   Snyder, R. L., and Christian, J. J. 1960.  Reproductive
       cycle and litter size of the woodchuck.Ecology 41:647-
       656                                                   !

553.   Green, R. G., Carlson, W. E., and Evans, C. A. 1942.
       The inactivation of vitamin Bi in diets containing
       whole fish.  J. Nutrition:23:165

554.   Brown, C. E. 1936.  Rearing wild animals in captivity,
       and gestation periods.  J. Mamm. 17(1):10-13

555.   Sheldon, W. G. 1949.  Reproductive behavior of foxes
       in New York State.  J. Mamm. 30(3):236-246

556.   Sullivan, E. G. 1956.  Gray fox reproduction, denning,
       range, and weights in Alabama.  J. Mamm. 37:346-357

557.   Schoonmaker, J. W. 1938.  Notes on mating and breeding
       habits of foxes in New York State.  J. Mamm. 19:375-
       376

558.   Pearson, O. P., and Enders, R. K. 1943.  Ovulation,
       maturation and fertilization in the fox.  Anatom.
       Record 85(1):69-83

559.   Pearson, O. P. 1946.  Certain aspects of reproduction
       in a head of silver foxes.  American Naturalist
       80(786):45-67

560.   Linhart, S. B., and Enders, R. K. 1964.  Some effects
       of diethylstilbestrol on reproduction in captive
       foxes.  Journal of Wildlife Management 28 (2):358-363

561.   Balser, D. S. 1964.  Management of predator popula-
       tions with antifertility agents.  Journal of Wildlife
       Management 28 (2):352-358

562.   Bissonnette, T. H., and Bailey, E. E. 1940.  Den and
       runway system for weasels and other small mammals in
       the laboratory.  Am. Midland Nat. 24:761-763

563.   Willis, L. S., and Barrow, M. V. 1971.  The ferret
       (Mustela putorius furo L.) as a laboratory animal.
       Lab. An. Sci. 21(5):712-716

564.   Aldous, S. E. 1940.  Notes on a black-footed ferret
       raised in captivity.  J. Mamm. 21(1):23-26

-------
565.    Hammond,  J.  Jr.,  and Chestennan,  F.  C.  1972.  The
       ferret.   The U.F.A.W.  Handbook on the Care and
       Management of Laboratory Animals  ch 29:354-363. ed
       U.F.A.W.  staff,  C.  Livingstone,  Edinburgh and London

566.    Errington, P. L.  1936.  Food habits of a weasel
       family.   J.  Mamm.  17:406-407

567.    Sanderson, G. C.  1949.  Growth and behavior of a litter
       of captive long-tailed weasels.   J.  Mamm. 30(4):412-
       415

568.    Svihla,  A. 1931.   Habits of the Louisiana mink (Mustela
       vison vulgivagus)  J. Mamm.  12:366-368

569.    Hamilton, W. J.,  Jr. 1936.   Food habits of the mink in
       New York.  J. Mamm. 17:169

570.    Wright,  P. L. 1942.  Delayed implantation in the long-
       tailed weasel (Mustela frenata), the short-tailed
       weasel (Mustela cicognani)and the marten  (Martes
       americana).  Anat.  Rec. 83:341-353

571.    Cuyler,  W. K. 1924.  Observations on the habits of
       the striped skunk  (Mephitis mesomelas varians).
       J. Mamm.  5:180-189

572.    Allen, D. L. 1939.   Winter habits of Michigan  skunks.
       J. Wildlife Mgmt.  3:212-288

573.    Stegeman, L. C.  1937.  Notes on young skunks in
       captivity.  J. Mamm. 18:194-202

574.    Wright, P-. L. 1948.  Breeding habits of  captive long-
       tailed weasels (Mustela frenata)..  Am. Midland Nat.
       39:338-344

575.    Petrides, G. A.  1950.  The determination of  sex and
       age ratios in fur  animals.   Amer. Midland  Nat.
       43:355-382

576.    Allen, D. L. , and  Shapton,  W.W.  1942.  An  ecological
       study of winter dens, with special reference to the
       eastern skunk.  Ecology 23:59-68

577.    Bill, J. F., and Chalgren,W.S. 1943.  Some wildlife
       diseases in  the eastern United States.   J.  Wildlife
       Management 7:311-317

-------
578.


579.



580.



581.



582.




583.



584.
585.
586.
587.
588.
589.
Hamilton, W. J., Jr. 1936.
New York.  J. Mamm. 17:240
Seasonal food of skunks in
Bauen, A., and Possanza, G. J. 1970.  The mink as a
psychopharmacological model.  Arch. Int. Phar. 186:
133-136

Sherburne, J. A., and Dimond, J. B.  1969.  DDT persis-
tence in wild hares and mink.  Journal of Wildlife
Management 33 (4):944-948

Aulerich, R. J., et  al. 1973.  Reproductive failure
and mortality in mTnk fed on Great Lakes fish.  P.
Reprod. Pert., Suppl. 19, pp 365-376

Aulerich, R. J., et  al. 1972.  Rate of accumulation
of chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticide residues in
adipose tissue of mink.  Can. J. of Zoo. 59 (9):1167-
1173

Aulerich, R. J., et  al. 1971.  Effects of  feeding
coho salmon and other Great Lakes fish on mink
reproduction.  Can. J. of Zoo. 49(5):611-616

Morris, J. E. 1968.  Insecticide residues in raccoons
and some effects of dieldrin on raccoon reproduction.
Master's Thesis, University of Missouri, Department
of Zoology

Jeffries, D. J. 1969.  Causes of badger mortality in
eastern counties of England.  J. Zool., London
157:429-436

Balazs, T., and Payne,X.J. 1971.  Myocardial papillary
muscle necrosis induced by hypotensive agents in dogs.
Tox. and App. Phar. 20:442-445

Chapel-Edwards,K. , et all. 1971.  Hematological changes
observed in female beagle dogs given ethynylestradiol.
Tox. and App. Phar. 20:319-326

Hardee, D. D., et  al. 1964.  Residues of heplachlor
epoxide and telodrin in milk from cows fed  at ppb
insecticide levels.  J. Econ. Entomology 56(3):404

Williams, S., e_t  al. 1964.  Residues in milk of cows
fed rations containing low concentrations of five
chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides.  J. of  A.O.A.C.
47(6):1124-1128

-------
590.   Carter, R.  H.,  et  al.  1956.   Pesticide residues in
       animal products.   The Yearbook of Agriculture, 1956-
       Aniiual Diseases,  USDA,  Washington, G.P.O.

591.   Mendoza, G. E.,  and Shields,  J.  B. 1971.   Esterase
       specificity and sensitivity to organophosphorous and
       carbamate pesticides:  factors affecting determination
       by thin layer  chromatography.   J. AOAC 54:507-511

592.   Radeleff, R. D.,  Woodard,  G.  T., and Bushland, R. C.
       1956.  Toxicity of insecticides.  The Yearbook of
       Agriculture, 1956, USDA, Washington, G.P.O.

593.   Waterman, R. A.  1972.  Effects of nicotinic acid or
       methionine administration on lipid metabolism of
       Ketotic cows.   Ph.D. Thesis,  University of Wisconsin

594.   De Faubert Maunder, M.  J.  et  al. 1964.  Clean-up
       of animal fats and dairy products for the analysis
       of chlorinated pesticide residues.  Analyst 89(1056)
       168-174

595. -  Binns, W. 1956.   Chemical poisoning, in:  The Yearbook
       of Agriculture/  USDA, Washington, G.P.O.

596.   Newton, G.  L.  1972.  Iodine toxicity. Physiological
       effects of elevated dietary iodine on calves and pigs.
       Ph.D. Thesis,  North Carolina State University, Raleigh,
       North Carolina

597.   Thomas, J.  W., and Moss, S. 1951.  The effect or orally
       administered molybdenum on growth, spermatogenesis,
       and testes histology of young dairy bulls.  J. Dairy
       Sci. 34:929-934

598.   Bernard, R. A. 1964.  An electrophysiological study
       of taste reception in peripheral nerves of the calf.
       Am. J. Physiol.  206:827-835

599.   Kara, M. A. 1963.  Comparative studies on the sense
       of taste.  Olfaction and Taste 11:285-292, ed. by
       Y. Zatterman,  Pergamon Press, New York

600.   Bustad, L.  K., and McClellan, R. 0. 1968.  Minature
     ,  swine:  development, management, and utilization.
       Lab. An. Care 18 (2):280-287

601.   Schilling, P.  W., and Stone, H. L. 1969.  Comparative
       cardiovascular measurements in the javelina  (Tayassu
       tajacu).  Lab. An. Care 19(3):331-335

-------
602.   Weaver, M.  E.,  et  al.  1965.   Minature swine as
       laboratory  animals.   Lab An.  Care 15(l):49-56

603.   Earl,  F. L.  1968.  Housing and handling of minature
       swine.  Lab.  An.  Care 18(1):110-115

604.   Tumbleson,  M.  E. , et.  al.  1968.  Techniques for
       handling minature swine for laboratory procedures.
       Lab. An. Care 18(5):584-587

605.   Dettmers, A.  1968.  On nutrition of the miniature
       pigs at the Hormel Institute.  Lab. An. Care 18(1):
       116-119

606.   Crossland,  J.  1973.   Man's best friends.  Envir.
       15(7):6-12,  28-30

607.   Duke,  T.' W.,  and  Szabuniewicz, M. 1969.  The electro-
       cardiogram  of conventional and miniature swine.
       Can. J. Comp.  Med. 33:118-127

608.   Ecobichon,  D.  J., and Comeau^ A. M. 1973.  Pseudo-
       cholinesterases of mammalian plasma:  physico-
       chemical properties and organophosphate inhibition
       in eleven species.  Tox. and App. Phar. 24:92-100

609.   Larks, S. D. ,  et   al. 1971.   Electrocardiographic
       studies of  miniature swine:   normal values.  Lab. An.
       Sci. 21(4)

610.   Planter, W.  S.  1948.  Electrocardiograms of mules,
       horses, cattle, sheep,  swine and goats.  University
       of Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station Research
       Bulletin 419:1-12

611.   Tumbleson,  M.  E., et  al.  1969.  Serum biochemic and
     ;/ hematologic parameters of Hormel miniature swine from
       four to nine months of age.   Lab. An. Care 19(3):
       345-351

612.   Tumbleson,  M.  E.  1971.   A selected list of references
       on the use  of swine in biomedical research.  Dept. of
       Veterinary  Physiology and Pharmacology, University of
       Missouri, Columbia

613.   Van Gelder,  G.  1974.  CHMN.  Dept. of Anatomy/
       Physiology,  School of Vet. Med., University of
       Missouri, Columbia,  Personal Communication

-------
614.   Wade, D.  A.  1972.   Effects of manganese chloride on
       gravis gilts and newborn pigs.  Ph.D.  Thesis,  South
       Dakota State University

615.   Huhn, R.  G., et  al.  1969.  Application of the orbital
       sinus bleeding technique to swine.   Lab.  An.  Care
       19(3}:403-405

616.   Hodge, H. C., et  al.  1967.  Toxicology and no-effect
       levels of aldrin and  dieldrin.  Tox.  and App.  Phar.
       10:613-675

617.   Quaife, M. L., et  al.  1967.  Survey of quantitative
       relationships between ingestion and storage of aldrin
       and dieldrin in animals and man.  Fed. Cosmet. Tox.
       5:39-50

618.   Bann, J.  M., et  al.  1956.  The fate of aldrin and
       dieldrin in the animal body.  J. Agr.  Food Chem.
       4(11):937-941

619.   Mendoza,  C.  E. , et  al. 1970.  Evaluation of esterases
       from livers of beef,  pig, sheep, monkey and chicken
       for detection of some pesticides by thin-layer
       chromatographic-enzyme inhibition technique.   Analyst
       94:805-810

620.   Knaak, J. B., et  al.  1968.  Metabolism of carbaryl
       in man, monkey, pig -and sheep.  J.  Agr. Food Chem.
       16(3):465-470

621.   Uzoukwn M. 1970.  Studies in experimental dieldrin
       and nitrite toxicoses in swine and guinea pigs.
       Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State University

622.   McClellan, R. O. 1968.  Applications of swine in
       biomedical research.   Lab. An. Care 18 (1)-.120-126

623.   Fletcher, W. S., et  al. 1964.  The use of the goat
       as an experimental animal.  Lab. An. Care 14:65-90

624.   Harrison, F. A. 1972.  Ungulates. Ch 30 pp 364-373
       in The U.F.A.W. Handbook on the Care and Management
       of Laboratory Animals ed. U.F.A.W. staff, C.
       Livingstone, Edinburgh and London

625.   Walker, K. C., et  al. 1965.  Residues of DDT in
       fatty tissues of big game animals in the states
       Idaho and Washington in 1962.  USDA, ARS 33-105

-------
626.   Oberst, F. W.,  et  al.  1970.   Toxic effects of high
       concentration of bromobenzylnitrile in various         j
       animal species.  Tox.  and App.  Phar. 16:66-72          j

627.   Elsberry, D. D. 1972.   Effect of dieldrin on auditory
       detection behavior and central auditory mechanisms in
       sheep.  Ph.D.  Thesis,  Iowa State University

628.   Van Gelder, G.  A., et  al. the effects of dieldrin and
       rulene exposure on experimental behavior and the
       electroencephalogram,  in:  Proceedings of the symposium
       on the biological impact of pesticides on the environ-
       ment.  Ed:  J.  W. Gillett, Environmental Health
       Sciences Series #1:125-133

629.   Van Gelder, G.  A. , et.  al. 1969.  Convulsive seizures
       in dieldrin exposed sheep during photic stimulation.
       Psycho. Reports 24:502

630.   Buck, W. 1974.   Personal Communication.  Behavioral
       Toxicology Lab, College of Vet. Medicine, Iowa State
       University, Ames, Iowa

631.   Murphy, D. A.,  and Korschgen, L. J. 1970.  Reproduc-
       tion, growth, and tissue residues of deer fed dieldrin.
       J. Wildlife Mgmt. 34 (4) :887-903

632.   Whicker, F. W., Farris,  G. C., and Dahl, A. H. 1966.
       Radioiodine in Colorado deer and elk thyroids during
       1964-65.  Journal of Wildlife Management 30 (4):781-785

633.   Longhurst, W.  M., Schultz, V., and Connolly, G. E.
       1967.  Accumulation of strontium-90 in yearling
       Columbian black-tailed deer,  1960-67.   Journal of
       Wildlife Management 32 (3):621-623

634.   Vickers, J. H.  1969.  Diseases of primates affecting
       the choice of species  for toxicological studies.  Ann.
       N. Y. Acad. Sci. 162:659-672

635.   Berendt, R. F.  1968.  The effect of physical and
       chemical restraint on selected respiratory parameters
       of Macaca mulatta.  Lab.  An.  Care 18(3):391-394

636.   Moeller, H. C., and Rider, J. A. 1962.  Plasma and red
       blood cell cholinesterase activity as  indications of
       the threshold of incipient toxicity of ethyl-p-nitro-
       phenyl thionobenzenephosphonate (EPN)  and malathion
       in human beings.  Tox.  and App. Phar.  4:123-130

-------
637.   Santolucito,  J.  A.,  and Morrison,  G.  1971.   EEC of
       rhesus monkeys following prolonged low-level feeding
       of pesticides.  Tox.  and App.  Phar.  19:147-154

638.   Moss, G. F.,  et  al.  1971.   Plasma levels and urinary
       excretion of  disodTum cromoglycate after inhalation
       by human volunteers.   Tox.  and App.  Phar. 20:147-156

639.   Budny, J. A., and Arnold, J. D. 1973.  Nitrilotriace-
       tate (NTA):   human metabolism and its importance in
       the total safety evaluation program.   Tox.  and Apo.
       Phar. 25:48-53

640.   Michael, W.  R. , and  Wakim,  J.  M. 1971.  Metabolism of
       nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA).  Tox. and App. Phar.
       18:407-416

641.   Banerjee, B.  N., and Woodard,  G. 1971.  Teratologic
       evaluation of metaproterenol in the rhesus monkey
       (Macaca mulatta). Tox. and App. Phar. 20:562-564

642.   Sherwood, B.  F., et   al. 1969.  The opossum, Didelphis
       virginiana,  as a laboratory animal.   Lab. An. Care
       19(4):494-499

643.   Coghill, G.  E. 1939.   Studies on rearing the opossum
       (Didelphys virginiana).  Ohio J. Sci. 39:239-249

644.   Moore, C. R., and Bodian, D. 1940.  Opossum pouch
       young as experimental material.  Anat. Rec. 76:319-327

645.   Krupp, J. H.  1964.  A review of the use of the opossum
       for research, husbandry, experimental techniques and
       routine health measures.  Lab. An. Care 14(3):189-194

646.   Crandall, L.  S. 1964.  Order Marsupialia, pp. 19-23
       in:  Management of Wild Mammals in Captivity.  Univ.
       of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois

647.   Thrasher, J.  1969.  Preliminary observations on mate
       compatability in Marmgsa mitis.  Lab. An. Care 19(1):
       67-70

648.   Wiseman, G.  L., and Hendrickson, G. O. 1950.  Notes
       on the life history  and ecology of the opossum in
       southeastern Iowa.  J. Mamm. 31(3):331-337

649.   Thrasher, J.  D., et  al. 1971.  The colony management
       of Marmosa mitis, the pouchless opossum.  Lab. An.
       Sci. 21(4)

-------
650.   Flatt, R. E., et  al  1971.  Besnoitia darling! in
       the opossum (Didelphis marsupial is") .   Lab. An. Sci.
       21(1):106-109

651.   Timmons, E. H. ,  and Marques, P. a. 1969.  Blood
       chemical and hematological studies in the laboratory
       confined, unanesthetized opossum, Didephis virginiana.
       Lab. An. Care 19:342-344

652.   Potkay, S. 1970.  Diseases of the opossum (Didelphis
       marsupialis);  a review.  Lab. An. Care 20:502-511

653.   Barnes, R. D. 1968.  Small marsupials as experimental
       animals.  Lab. An. Care 18:251-257

654.   Thrasher, J.  D. , e_t  al. 1971.  Natural variations in
       the S-phase of renewing epithelia of the pouchless
       opossum, Marmosa mites.  Cell Tissue Kinet.  4:185-192

655.   Feldman, D. B.,  and Self, J. L. 1971.  Sedation and
       anesthesia of the Virginia opossum,  Didelphis virginiana
       Lab. An. Sci. 21 (5) -.117-120

656.   Jurgelski, W., Jr. 1971.  Administration of test
       materials to the neonatal North American opossum
       (Didelphys marsupialis ,virginiana Kerr).  Lab. An.
       Sci. 21(5):748-751

657.   Gilbert, B. M.,  and Giacumetti, L. 1972.  An environ-
       mental caging system and maintenance program for the
       nine-banded armadillo  (Dasypus novemcinctus).  Lab.
       An. Sci. 22(5):739-740

658.   Crandall, L.  S.  1964.  Family Dasypodidae, pp. 190-194
       in:  Management of Wild Mammals in Captivity.  Univ.
       of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois

659.   Anderson, J.  M., and Benirschke, K.  1966.  The
       armadillo, Dasypus novemcinctus, in  experimental
       biology.  Lab. An. Care 16(3):202-216

660.   Meritt, Dennis A., Jr. 1973.  Edentate diets. I.
       Armadillos.  Lab. An. Sc. 23(4):540-542

661.   Talmage, R. V.,  and Buchanan, G. D.  1954.  The
       armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus):  a review of its
       natural history, ecology, anatomy, and reproductive
       physiology.  Pamphlet 41 (2) .-1-135, The Rice
       Institute, Houston, Texas

-------
662.   Dhindsa,  D.  S.  1971.   Respiratory functions of
       armadillo blood.   Fed.  Proc.  30:494

663.   Lewis, J. H.,  and Doyle,  A.  P.  1964.   Coagulation,
       protein and cellular  studies on armadillo blood.
       Comp.   Biochem.  Physiol.  12:61-66

664.   Ebaugh, F. G.,  Jr., and Benson, M. A.  1964.  Arma-
       dillo hemoglobin characteristics and  red cell survival.
       J. Cell,  and Comp. Physiol.  64:183-192

665. '  Strozier, L. M.,  et  al.  1971.   Armadillos:  basic
       profiles I.   Serum chemistry values.   Lab. Animal
       Sci. 21(3):399-400

666.   Strozier, L. M.,  et  al.  1971.   Armadillos:  basic
       profiles II.  Serum proteins.  Lab.  An.  Sci. 21(4)

667.   Marston,  J.  H.,  and Chang,  M. C. 1965.  The breeding,
       management and reproductive physiology of the Mongolian
       gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus).  Lab.  An. Care
       15(1):34-48

668.   Schwentker,  V.  1963.   The gerbil, a  new laboratory
       animal.  The Illinois Veterinarian,  6:5-9

669.   Durbin, D. G. ,  and Robens,  J. F. 1964.  The use of
       laboratory animals for drug testing.   Ann. W.Y. Acad.
       Sci. 3 (2):696-711

670.   Vos, J. G. ,  e_t  al.  1970.  Identification and toxic-
       ological evaluation of chlorinated dibenzofuran and
       chlorinated naphthalene in two commercial polychlor-
       inated biphenyls.  Food Cosmet. Tox.  8:625-633

671.   Draize, J. H.,  et  al. 1944.  Methods for the study
       of irritation and toxicity of substances applied
       topically to the skin and mucous membranes.  J. Pharm.
       and Exp. Therap. 82:377-390

672.   Gustafson, C.  G. 1970.  PCB's—prevalent and persis-
       tent intensified research is needed to minimize their
       dangers.  Envir. Sci. and Tech. 4 (10)-.814-819

673.   Ancill, R. J.,  and Richens, E. R. 1971.  The effects
       of various hormones on the uptake and distribution of
       an organic mercurial compound in the guinea pig eye.
       Tox. and App.  Phar. 20:206-215

-------
674.   Perm, V. H.,  and Carpenter, J.  J. 1970.   Teratogenic
       and embryopathic effects of indium, gallium and
       germanium.   Tox. and App. Phar. 16:166-170             t

675.   Robens, J.  F. 1970.  Teratogenic activity of several   I
       phthalimide derivatives in the golden hamster.  Tox.   j
       and App. Phar.  16:24-34                                j

676.   Anon. 1970.   Another herbicide on the blacklist.       j
       Nature 226:309-311                                     !
                                                              j
677.   Ambrose, A.  M.  1963.  Toxicologic studies on pyre-     j
       thrin-type esters of chrysanthemumic acid.  Tox. and   j
       App. Phar.  5:414-426

678.   Sullivan, L.  J., et  al. 1972.   In vitro vs. in vivo
       chromatographic profiles of carbaryl anionic meta-
       bolites in man and lower animals.  Tox.  and App.
       Phar. 22:161-174

679.   Knaak, J. B., et  al. 1965.  The metabolism of car-
       baryl in the rat, guinea pig and man.  J. Agr. Food
       Chem. 13(5):537-543

680.   Lyon, J. P.,  et  aj.. 1970.  Repeated and continuous
       exposure of laboratory animals to acrolein.  Tox.
       and App. Phar.  17:726-732

681.   Fleisher, J.  H., et  al. 1970.   Antagonism of sarin
       poisoning in rats and guinea pigs by atropine, oximes
       and mecamylamine.  Tox. and App. Phar. 16:40-47

682.   Adams, E. M. , e_t  al. 1952.  Vapor toxicity of carbon
       tetrachloride determined by experiments  on laboratory
       animals.  A.M.A. Arch. Ind. Hyg. and Occup. Med.
       6:50-66

683.   Shubik, P.  1972.  The use of the Syrian golden hamster
       in chronic toxicity testing.  Progr. exp. Tumor Res.
       16:176-184

684.   Jones, R. A., e_t  al. 1970.  Effects of long-term
       continuous inhalation of ozone on experimental animals.
       Tox. and App. Phar. 17:189-202

685.   Murphy, S.  D.,  et  al. 1963.  Altered function in
       animals inhaling conjugated nitro-olefins.  Tox. and
       App. Phar.  5:319-330

-------
686.   Valenstein,  E.  S.,  Riss,  W.,  and Young,  W.  C.  1954.
       Sex drive in inbred guinea pigs.  J.  Corap.  Physio.
       Physchol.  47:162-165

687.   Barnes, R.  D.  1968.  Invertebrate zoology.   W. B.
       Saunders Company,  Philadelphia

688.   Bent, A. C.  1940.   Life history of North American
       cuckoos, goatsuckers, hummingbirds, and  their allies.
       Bull. 176 Smithsonian Inst.  U.S. Nat. Museum.   USGPO,
       Washington,  D.  C.

689.   Bent, A. C.  et  al. 1968.  Life history  of North
       American cardinals, grosbeaks, buntings, townees,
       finches, sparrows  and allies.  Bull.  237, part III.
       Smithsonian Inst.  Press,  Washington,  D.  C.

690.   Bent, A. C.  et  al. 1968.  Bull. 237,  part II.
       Smithsonian Inst.  Press,  Washington,  D.  C.

691.   Korschgen,  L.  J. 1971.  Disappearance and persistence
       of aldrin after five annual applications.  Journal of
       Wildlife Management 35(3) :494-500

692.   Kring, J. B. 1969.   Mortality of the earthworm,
       Lumbricus terrestris L.,  following soil  applications
       of insecticides to a tobacco field.  J.  Scientific
       Notes 62:963

693.   Giese, A. C.,  and  Christensen, E. 1954.   Effects of
       ozone on organisms.  Physiol. Zoo. 27(2):101-114

694.   Herzberg, F. and Herzberg, A. 1960.  The effect of
       cold on growth of  Helix aspersa.  J. Exp. Zool. 145:
       191-196

695.   Hyche, L. L. 1956.   Control of mites infesting
       earthworm beds.  J. Econ. Entom. 49(3):409-410

696.   Hagstrum, D. W. 1970.  The ecological energetics of
       Tarentula kockii (Aranea, Lycosidae):  its physio-
       logical basis,relation to microclimate  and inter-
       action with selected insecticides.  Ph.D. Thesis,
       University of California, Riverside, California

697.   Attiah, H. H., and Boudreaux, H. B.  1964.  Influence
       of DDT on egg-laying in spider mites.  J. Econ.
       Entomol. 57:50-53

-------
698.   Hueck, H. J.,  et  al. 1952.  The increase of egg
       production of the fruit tree red spider mite under
       influence of DDT.  Physiol. Comp. Occol. 2:371-379

699.   Gamin, J. H.,  et  al. 1964.  Control of the snake
       mite Ophionipsus natricia  (Gervais)  in captive
       reptile collections.  Zoologica 49(4):65-79

700.   Hopkins, R., and Kirk, V. M. 1957.  Effect of several
       insecticides on the English red worm.  J. Econ.
       Entomol. 50:699-701

701.   Ahmed, M. F.,  et  al. 1954.  The effect of systox on
       some common predators of the cotton aphid.  J. Econ.
       Entom. 47:445-449

702.   Atkins, E. L.,  Jr., and Anderson, L. D. 1954.
       Toxicity of pesticide dusts to honeybees.  J. Econ.
       Entom. 47(6):969-972

703.   Coaker, T. H.  1966.  The effect of soil insecticides
       on the predators and parasites of the cabbage root
       fly (Erioischia brassicai  (Bouche)}  and on the
       subsequent damage caused by the pest.  Ann. Appl.
       Biol.  57:397-407

704.   Wright, D. W.,  et_  al. 1960.  The effect of certain
       predators on the numbers of cabbage root fly
       (Eriorachia brassicae)( Bouche)  and on the subsequent
       damage caused by the pest.  Ann. App. Bio. 48:756-763

7C5.   Cooper, E. L.  1965.  A method of tissue grafting in
       the earthworm,  Lumbricus terrestris.  Am. Zool.
       5:254

706.   Cherry, E. T.  1970.  The effects of carbofuran and
       disulfoton on certain beneficial and destructive
       insects occuring on burley tobacco.   Ph.D. Thesis
       University of Tennessee

707.   Way, M. J., and Scopes, N. E. A. 1968.  Studies on
       the persistence and effects on soil fauna of some
       soil-applied systemic insecticides.   Ann. App. Bio.
       62:199-214

708.   Edwards, C. A., and Dennis, E. B. 1960.  Some effects
       of aldrin and DDT on the soil fauna of arable land.
       Nature 188(4752):767

-------
710.    Springer,  P.  E. ,  and Webster,  J.  R.  1951.   Biological
       effects of DDT applications  on tidal salt  marshes.
       Mosquito News 2 (2):67-74

711.    Hinsch, H., and Crandal,  C.  P.  1969.  The  effects of
       etorphine (M-99), oxymorphons  hydrochlorine and
       neperidine hydrochloride  in  reptiles.   Copeia 2:404

712.    Calderwood, H. W. 1971.  Anesthesia  for reptiles.
       J.A.V.M.A. 159(11)-.1618-1625

713.    Kramer, K. L., et  al.  1965.  Surgical anesthesia in
       snakes.  Exp. AnTmal Anethesia, U.S.A.F. School of
       Aerospace Med. 374-378

714.    Brock, E.  M.  1965.   Toxicological feeding trials to
       evaluate the hazard of  secondary poisoning to gopher
       snakes, Pituophis catenifer.  Copeia 1965 (2):244-245

715.    Burghardt, G. M., and Abeshaheen, J. P. 1971.  Re-
       sponses to chemical stimuli  of prey  in newly hatched
       snakes of the genus Elaphe.   An.  Behavior 19:486-489

716.    Saxon, J.  G.  1970.   The biology of the lizard
       Cnemidophorus tesselatus, and effects of pesticides
       upon the population in  the Presidior Basin, Texas.
       Texas A&M University, University Microfilms; A2
       Michigan Order No.  70-22, 954

717.    Johlin, J. M., and Moreland, F. B. 1933.  Studies of
       the blood picture of the  turtle after complete anoxia.
       J. Bio. Chem. 103:107-114

718.    McCutcheon, F. H. 1943.  The respiratory mechanism
       in turtles.  Phys.  Zoo. 16(3):255-269

719.    Mulla, M.  S.  1966.   Toxicity of new organic insecti-
       cides to mosquito fish  and some other aquatic
       organisms.  Mosquito News 26(1):87-91

720.    Mulla, M.  S., et  al. 1963.   Field studies on the
       effects of insecticides on some aquatic wildlife
       species.  J.  Econ.  Entomol.  56(2):184-188

721.    Mulla, M.  S.  1963.  Toxicity of organochlorine
       insecticides to the mosquito fish Gambusia affinis
       and the bullfrog Rana catesbeiana.Mosquito News
       23(4):299-303

-------
722.   Cooke, A. S. 1973.  Response of Rana temporaria
       tadpoles to chronic doses of p,p-DDT, Copexa, No.  4
       pp 647-652

723.   Heath, R. G.,  and Prouty, R. M. 1967.  Trial monitoring
       of pesticides  in wings of mallards and black ducks.
       Env. Contain, and Tox.  Bull. 2(2):101

724.   Heath, R. G.,  et  al.  1969.  Marked DDE impairment
       of mallard reproduction in controlled studies.  Nature
       224(5214):47-48

725.   Lehner, P. N., and Egert, A. 1969.  Dieldrin and
       eggshell thickness in ducks.  Nature 224:1218-1219

726.   Muller, H. D., and Lockman, D. C. 1972.  Fecundity and
       progeny  growth following subacute insecticide
       ingestion by the mallard.  Poultry Sci. 51:239-241

727.   Heath, R. G.,  et  al.  1972.  Comparative dietary
       toxicities of  pesticides to birds.  Bureau Sport
       Fisheries Wildlife, Spec. Sci. Report Wildlife, 152

728.   Peakall, D. B. 1967.  Pesticide induced enzyme
       breakdown of steroids in birds.  Nature 216:505-506

729.   Bree, M. M., and Gross, N. B. 1969.  Anesthesia of
       pigeons with CI 581 and pentobarbital.  Lab. An.
       Care 19:500-502

730.   Webster, D. M., and Hollard, V. D. 1973.  A safe and
       simple injection anesthetic for birds.  Physiol.
       Behavior 10:831

731.   Kreitzer, J. F. and Spann, J. W. 1968.  Mortality
       among bobwhites confined to a heptachlor contaminated
       environment.  J. of Wildlife Mgmt. 32(4):874-878

732.   Hessler, E. et  al. 1970.  A biotelemetery study of
       survival of pen-reared pheasants released in selected
       habitats.  Journal of Wildlife Management 34 (2):267

733.   Kuck, T. L. et  al. 1970.  Movements and behavior of
       hen pheasants  during the nesting season.  Journal of
       Wildlife Management 34 (3) :626-630

734.   Dahlgren, R. B., and Linder, R. L. 1971.  Effects of
       polychlorinated biphenyls on pheasant reproduction,
       behavior and survival.'  Journal of Wildlife Manage-
       ment 35(2):315-318

-------
735.   Spann,  J.  W.  et  al.  1972.   Ethyl mercury p-toluene
       sulfonanilide:   lethal and  reproductive effects on
       pheasants.  Science 175:328-331

736.   Jefferies, D. J.  1973.  The effects of organochlorine
       insecticides and their metabolites  on breeding birds.
       J. Reprod. Pert.  (Suppl.)  19:337-352

737.   Wurster, D. F. , et  al. 1965.   Bird mortality after
       spraying for Dutch elm disease with DDT.  Sci. 148:
       90-91

738.   Decino, T. J.,  Cunningham,  D.  J., and Schafer, E. W.
       1965.  Toxicity of DRC-1339 to starlings.  Journal of
       Wildlife Management 29:249-253

739.   Martin, W. E. 1972.  Mercury and lead residues in
       starlings-1970.  Pest. Mon. J. 6(l):27-32

740.   Martin, W. E.,  and Nickerson,  P.  R. 1972.  Organo-
       chlorine residues in starlings-1970.  Pest. Mon. J.
       6(1):33-40

741.   Hill, E. F. 1972.  Avoidance of lethal dietary con-
       centrations of insecticide by house sparrows.  J.
       Wildlife Mgmt.  36(2):635

742.   Davidson, K. L., Sell, J.  L.,  and Rose, R. J. 1971.
       Dieldrin poisoning of chickens during severe dietary
       restriction.  Env. Contain,  and Tox. Bull. 5(6):493-501

743.   Seifert, J. H.  , e_t  al. 1968.   Effect of dietary
       restrictions upon dieldrin poisoning in chickens.
       Ann. Proc. of the North Dakota Acad. Sci 22:36-44

744.   Sherman, M. W., et  al. 1964.   Acute- and subacute
       toxicity of several organophophorus insecticides to
       chicks.  Tox. and App. Phar.  6:147-153

745.   Sherman, M., and Ross, E.  1961.  Acute  and subacute
       toxicity of insecticides to chicks.  Tox. and App.
       Phar. 3:521-533

746.   Ghadiri, M., et  al.  Biological effect of feeding
       malathion and carbaryl to laying hens and to roosters.
       Proc. Utah Acad. Sci.p. 185

747.   Arnold, R. L. 1971.   Effects  of various  levels of
       dietary selenium and  arsenic  on chickens.  Ph.D.
       Thesis, South Dakota  State University

-------
748.   Davison, K. L., and Sell, J. L. 1972.  Dieldrin and
       p,p*-DDT effects on egg production and eggshell thick-
       ness of chickens.  Bulletin of Envir. Contain. Tox.
       7(1):9-18

749.   Cecil, H. C. 1972.  Dietary p,p"-DDT, o,p"-DDT or p,Ł-DDH
       and changes in eggshell characteristics and pesticide  |
       accumulation in egg contents and body fat of caged
       white leghorns.  Poultry Sco. 51:130-139

750.   Sauter, E. A., and Steele, E. E. 1972.  The effect of
       low level pesticide feeding on the fertility and
       hatchability of chicken eggs.  Poultry Sci. 51:71-76

751.   Lillie, R. J. et  al. 1973.  Dietary calcium, DDT
       source and age of hen on the reproductive performance
       of caged white leghorns fed DDT.  Poultry Sci.
       52(2):636-644

752.   Conaway, C. H. 1958.  Maintenance, reproduction and
       growth of the least shrew in captivity.  J. Mamm.
       39:507-512

753.   Allanson, M., and Deanesly, R.  1934.  The reaction of
       anoestrous hedgehogs to experimental conditions. Proc.
       of the Roy. Soc. Lond. B. 116:170-185

754.   Hine,  C. H., Megers, F. H., and Wright, R. W. 1970.
       Pulmonary changes in animals exposed to nitrogen
       dioxide, effects of acute exposures.  Tox. and App.
       Phar.  16:201-213                                       j

755.   Villeneuve, D. C., et  al. 1971.  Effects of PCB
       administration on mTcrosomal enzyme activity in        |
       pregnant rabbits.  Env. Contarn, and Tox. Bull. 6(2):
       120-128                                                |

756.   Guilbault, G. G., Sadar, M. H., Kaun, S., and Casey,
       D. 1970.  Effects of pesticides on liver cholinester-
       ases from rabbit, pigeon, chicken, sheep and pig.
       Anal,  Chim. Acta. 51:83-93

757.   Gardner, A. F. 1964.  The development of general
       anesthesia in the albino rabbit for surgical procedures.
       Lab. An. Care 14(3):214-225

758.   Bucher, N.L.R. 1946.  Effects of 24-Dichlorophenoxyacet;
       acid on experimental animals'.  Proc. Soc. Exp. Bid. Med.
       63:204

-------
759.    Wright,  P.  A.  1960.   Infertility in rabbits induced by
       feeding  ladino clover.   Soc.  Exp.  and Med.  105:428-430

760.    Petty, C.  W.,  and Karler,  R.  1965.   The influence of
       aging on the  activity of anticonvulsant drugs.   J.
       Pharm. Exp. Therap.  150 (3):443-448

761.    Good, E. E. ,  and Ware,  G.  W.  1969.   Communication.
       Tox. and App.  Phar.  14:201-203

762.    Christian,  J.  J., and Davis,  D.  E.  1966.  Adrenal
       glands in female voles (Microtus pennsyIvanicus)  as
       related  to reproduction and population size.  J.  Mamm.
       47(1):1-18

763.    Golley,  F.  B., et  al.  1968.   Components of growth in
       Peromyscus polionotus.   Growth 32:103-111

764.    Reid, L. 1970.  Evaluation of model systems for study
       of airway epithelium, cilia and mucus.  Arch. Intern.
       Med. 126:428-434

765.    Dalhamn, T. 1956.  Mucous flow and ciliary activity
       in the trachea of healthy rat and rats exposed to
       respiratory irritant gases.  Acta. Physiol. Scand.,
       36  (supplement 123)

766.    Goldberg, M.  E., and Salama, A. I. 1969.  Amphetamine
       toxicity and  brain monoamines in three models of
       stress.   Tox.  and App. Phar. 14:447-456

767.    Fuller,G.C.,  Bousquet, W.F., and Miza,T.S.  1972.
       Effect of cold exposure on drug action and hepatic drug
       metabolism in the rat.  Tox. and App. Phar. 23:10-19

768.    Brown, J. R.  1970.  The effect of environmental and
       dietary stress on the concentration of l,l-bis(4-
       chlorophenyl)-2,2,2-trichloroethane in rats.  Tox.
       and App. Phar. 17:504-510

769.    DeFreitas, A.  S. W., et  al. 1969.  Chronic cold
       exposure and  DDT toxicTty.  Chapter 18:361-367 in:
       Chemical Fallout, Current Research on Persistent
       Pesticides, ed. by M. W. Miller and G. G. Berg.
       Charles C. Thomas, Publisher, Springfield,  Illinois

770.    Adler, J. H.  1967.  Aspects of stress in animals.
       Husb. Lab. An. 239-254

-------
771.   Siegel, J. 1971.   Effects on experimental animals of
       acute, repeated and continuous inhalation exposures to
       dichloroacetylene mixtures.   Tox.  and App.  Phar.  18:
       168-174

772.   Jenkins, L. J. , Jr., et  al. 1970.   Long-term inhala-
       tion screening studies of benzene,  toluene, oxylene,
       and cumene on experimental animals.   Tox. and App.
       Phar. 16:818-823

773.   Jenkins, L. J., Jr., et  al. 1970.   Repeated and con-
       tinuous exposures of laboratory animals to trichloro-
       fluoromethane.   Tox. and App. Phar.  16:133-142

774.   Durham, W. F. 1969.  The influence of other factors
       on the toxicity of pesticides, Chapter 23:433-446 in:
       Chemical Fallout, Current Research on Persistent Pest-
       icides, ed. by M. W. Miller and G.  G. Berg.Charles
       C. Thomas, President, Springfield,  Illinois

775.   Meshorer, A., and Benhar, E. 1966.   Accidental
       poisoning of inbred male mice by carbon tetrachloride.
       Lab. An. Care 16(3):198-201

776.   Casterline, J.  L., et  al. 1971.  The effect of 28-day
       pesticide feeding on serums and tissue enzyme activities
       of rats fed diets of varying casein content.  Tox. and
       App. Phar. 18:607-618

777.   Fouts, J. R. 1970.  Some in vitro assay conditions that
       affect detection and quantitation of phenobarbital-
       induced increases in hepatic microsomal drug-metaboliz-
       ing enzyme activity.  Tox. and App.  Phar. 16:48-65
                        *
778.   Kay, K. 1966.  Effect of pesticides on enzyme systems
       in mammals.  Adv. Chem. Ser. 60:54-66

779.   Thompson, W. R. 1947.  Use of moving averages and
       interpolation to estimate median-effective dose.  Bact.
       Rev. 11:115-143

780.   Hart, L. G., and Fouts, J. R. 1965.   Further studies
       on the stimulation of hepatic microsomal drug metabo-
       lizing enzymes by DDT and its analogs.  Naunyn-Schmie-
       debergs Arch. exp. Path. U.  Pharmak. 249:486-500

781.   Bratkowski, T.  A. 1970.  Isolation and properties of a
       DDT-sensitive adenosine triphosphatase complex from
       rat brain.  Ph.D., Thesis, University of Wisconsin,
       Madison, Wisconsin

-------
782.    Ball,  W.  L.,  et  al.  1954.   Modification of parathion's
       toxicity  for  rats by  pretreatment with chlorinated
       hydrocarbon insecticides.   Can.  J. Biochem. Physiol.
       32:440-445

783.    Hagen, E. 0., and Hagen,  J.  M.  1964.   A method of
       inhalation anesthesia for laboratory  mice.   Lab.  An.
       Care.  14:13-15

784.    Alary, J. G., and Brodeux,  J.  1970.   Correlation be-
       tween the activity of liver enzymes and the LD5Q of
       parathion in  the rat.  Can.  J.  Physical. Pharmacol.
       48(12) :829-831

785.    Gaines, T. B. 1960.  The  acute toxicity of pesticides
       to rats.   Tox. and App. Phar.  2:88-99

786.    Gaines, T. B. 1969.  Acute toxicity of pesticides.
       Tox.  and  App. Phar. 14:515-534

787.    Jacobson, K.  H. 1972.  Acute oral toxicity of mono and
       di-alkyl  ring-substituted derivatives of aniline.  Tox.
       and App.  Phar. 22:153-154

788.    Guthrie,  F. E., et  al. }.971.   Response of the labora-
       tory mouse to selection for resistance to insecticides.
       Tox.  and  App. Phar. 18:92-101

789.    Apostolou, A., and Peoples, S. A. 1971.  Toxicity of
       the avicide 2-chloro-4-acetoluidide in rats:  a com-
       parison with  its nonacetylated from 3-chloro-p-tolui-
       dine.   Tox.  and App.  Phar. 18:517-521

790.    Al-Hachim, G. M., and Fink, G. B. 1968.  Effect of DDT
       or arathion on condition  avoidance response of off-
       spring from DDT or parathion treated mothers.
       Psychopharmacologia 12:424-427

791.    Triolo, A. J., and Coon,  J. M. 1966.   The protective
       effect of aldrin against  the toxicity of organo-
       phosphate anticholinesterases.  J. Pharm. and Exp.
       Therap. 154 (3) .-613-623

792.    Ortega, P. 1966.  Light and electron microscopy of
       dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane  (DDT) poisoning in
       the rat liver.  Lab.  Invest. 15(4):657-679

793.    Weaver, L. C., and Kerley, T. L.  1962.  Strain
       difference in response of mice to d=amphetamine.
       J. Pharm. Ext. Therap. 133:240-244

-------
794.   Landauer, W., and Wakasugi, N. 1968.  Teratological
       studies with sulphonamides and their implications.
       J. Emb. Exp. Morph. 20 (3) :261-284

795.   Nelson,S.C. et al. 1956.  Serum alkaline phosphatase
       levels, weight changes and mortality rates of rats
       fed endrin.  J. Agr. and Food Chem. 4(8):696-700

796.   Chance, M. R. A. 1946.  Aggregation as a factor
       influencing the toxicity of sympathomimetic amines
       in mice.  J. Phar. and Exp. Ther. 87:214

797.   Bovard, E. W. 1958.  The effects of early handling
       on viability of the albino rat.  Psycho. Review
       65(5):257-271

798.   Oser, B. L., et  al. 1963.  Safety evaluation studies
       of calcium EDTA.  Tox. and App. Phar. 5:142-162

799.   Olson, K. J. 1972.  Preface - series of papers relat-
       ing reproductive activity to selected organosiloxane
       chemicals.  Tox. and App. Phar. 21:12-14

800.   Righter, H. F. 1972.  Influence of age and sexual
       status on the development of toxic effects in the male
       rat fed aflatoxins.  Tox. and App. Phar. 21:435-439

801.   Deichmann, W. B., and Keplinger, M. L. 1966.  Effects
       of combinations of pesticides on reproduction of mice.
       Tox. and App. Phar. 8:337-338

802.   Palmes, E. D., and Del Pup, J. 1970.  Mouse populations,
       biological systems for evaluating effects of environ-
       mental agents.  Trans. N. Y. Acad. of Sci. 32:381-384

803.   Barnes, J. M., and Denz, F. A. 1954.  Experimental
       methods used in determining chronic toxicity.  Phar.
       Rev. 6:191-242

804.   Les, E. P. 1968.  Environmental factors influencing
       body weight of C57BL#/6J and DBA/&2J mice.  Lab. An.
       Care 18(6):623-625

805.   Weil, C. S., and Carpenter, C. P. 1969.  Abnormal
       values in control groups during repeated-dose
       toxicologic studies.  Tox. and App. Phar. 14:335-339

806.   Hadlow, W. J., et  al. 1955.  Stilbestrol-contaminated
       feed and reproductive disturbances in mice.  Science
       122:643-644

-------
807.    Les, E.  P.  1968.   Effect of acidified-chlorinated
       water on reproduction in C3H/HeJ and C57BL/6J mice.
       Lab. An. Care 18(2):210-213

808.    Radovich, B.  T.  1971.  The effect of triethylene
       melanine upon the initial reproductive performance
       of the F]_ generation.  Ph.D.  Thesis, George Washington
       University.

809.    Spyker,  J.  M. 1971.   Methylmercury,  mice and men.
       Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota

810.    Hadlow,  W.  J., and Grimes, E. F. 1955.  Influence of
       stilbestrol-contaminated feed on reproduction in a
       colony of mice.   Proc. An. Care Panel 6:19-25

811.    Bernard, R. F. and Gaertner,  R. A. 1964.  Some effects
       of DDT on reproduction in mice.  J.  Mamm. 45(2):272-276

812.    Bernard, R. F.,  and Gaertner, R. A.  1964.  Some effects
       of DDT on reproduction in mice.  J.  Mamm. 45(2):272-276

813.    Downhower,  J. F., and Pauley, J. D.  1970.  Automated
       recordings of body temperature from free-ranging
       yellow-bellied marmots.  Journal of Wildlife Management
       34(3) .-639-641.

814.    Blackmore,  D. K.  1963.  The toxicity of some chlorinated
       hydrocarbon insecticides to British wild foxes.  J.
       Comp. Path 73:391-409

815.    Bissonnette, T.  H., and Csech, A. G. 1937.  Modifica-
       tion of mammalian sexual cycles, VII-Fertile matings
       of raccoons in December instead of February induced
       by increasing daily periods of light.  Proc. Roy.  Sci.
       Lond. B 122(827):246-254

816.    Ringer, R.  K. et  al. 1972.  Effect of dietary poly-
       chlorinated biphenyls on growth and reproduction of
       mink.  164th Nat. Meeting of Amer. Chem. Soc., Vol.
       12(2):149-154

817.    Aulerich, R. J., et  al. 1974.  Effects of dietary
       mercury on mink.  Archives of Envir. Contain, and Tox.
       Vol. 2(1):43-51

818.    Asmundsson, T., and Kilburn, K. H. 1970.  Mucociliary
       clearance rates at various levels in dog lungs.  Am.
       Rev. Resp.  Dis. 102:388-397

-------
819.   Mauck, H. P., Jr., et  al. 1965.  The level and stage
       of anesthesia:  its influence on cardiac output and
       related hemodynamics.  Tox. and App. Phar. 7:301-307

820.   Harrison, D. L., Maskel, P. E. G.,  and Money, D. F. L.
       1963.  Dieldrin poisoning of dogs.   New Zealand Vet.
       J. 11(2):23-31

821.   Stowe, H. D., et  al. 1973.  Experimental oral lead
       toxicity in young dogs.  Arch. Pathol.95:106-116

822.   Deichmann, W. B., et  al. 1971.  Subnormal reproduction
       in beagle dogs induced fay DDT and aldrin.  Ind. Med.
       and Surg. 40(2):10-20

823.   Anderson, R. S. 1961.  Diuresis due to stress in
       cattle.  Nature 192:460

824.   Lonsdale, E. M. , Brapach, B. , and Thome, E. T. 1971.
       A telemetry system to determine body temperature in
       pronghorn antelope.  Journal of Wildlife Management
       35(4):747-751

825.   Gilmar, D. S. 1971.  A device for monitoring radio-
       marked animals.  Journal of Wildlife Management
       35(4):829-832

826.   Van Ballenberghe, V., and Peek, J.  M. 1971.  Radio-
       telemetry studies of moose in northeastern Minnesota.
       Journal of Wildlife Management 35(1):63-71

827.   Swiggart, R. C., et  al. 1972.  Wildlife kill resulting
       from the misuse of arsenic acid herbicide.  Bulletin
       Envir. Contain. Tox. 8(2):122-128

828.   Thrasher, J. D. 1970.  The cell cycle and turnover
       times of the small intestinal epithelia of the
       pouchless opossum, Marmosa mitis.  Experientia 26:
       871-872

829.   Peters, J. H., and Storrs, E. E. 1972.  Amino acid
       levels and L-Asparanginase and Histaminase Activities
       in plasma of the armadillo, Dasypus novemcinctus.
       Lab.  An. Sci. 22 (2):233-235

830.   Wilson, T. H., and Wiseman, G. 1954.  The uses of sacs
       of everted small intestine for the study of the trans-
       ference of substances from the mucosal to the serosal
       surface.  J. Physiol. 123:116-125

-------
831.    McCollister,  F.  0.,  and Rows,  V.  K.  1964.   Toxicology
       of acrylamide.   Tox.  and App.  Phar.  6:172-181

832.    Keefe,  T.  J. , e_t  al.  1964.   Ornithonyssus bacoti
       (Hirst)  infestation  in mouse and  hamster colonies.
       Lab.  An. Care 14 (5)-.366-369

833.    Wright,  J.  P.,  and Seibold,  H.  R.  1958.   Nutrition:
       estrogen contamination of pelleted feed  for laboratory
       animals, effect on guinea pig reproduction.   J.  Am.
       Vet.  Med.  Assoc. 132:258-261

834.    Way,  M.  J., and Scopes, N. E.  A.  1965.   Side effects
       of some soil-applied systemic insecticides.   Proc.
       of the  Assoc. of App.  Bio. 55:340-341

835.    Gish, C. D.,  and Christensen, R.  E.  1973.  Cadmium,
       nickel,  lead and zinc in earthworms  from roadside
       soil. Envir.  Sci. Tech. 7:1060-1062

836.    Pelluet, D. 1964. The hormonal control  of cell
       differentiation in the ovotestis of slugs (Gastero-
       poda:  Pulmonata).  Can. J.  Zoo.  42:195-199

837.    Louis-Ferdinand, R.  T., and  Fuller,  G.  C. 1970.  The
       mechanism of the biologic activity of a series of
       nitroolefins.  Tox.  and App. Phar. 16:668-674

838.    Duncan,  C. J. 1961.   Spontaneous activity in the
       isolated nerves of Pulmonate molluscs.   Comp. Biochem.
       Physiol. 3:42-51

839.    Derr, S. K. 1972.  Biologically active compounds in
       the aquatic environment:  a  study of two environmental
       contaminants, DDE and Aroclor 1254,  on the aquatic
       midge,  Chironomus tetans.  Ph.D.  Thesis, Michigan
       State University

840.    Brattsten, L. B. 1971.  Role of mixed function
       oxidases of insects  in their response to xenobiotics.
       Ph.D. Thesis, University of  Illinois, Champaign-
       Urbana, Illinois

841.    Vinopal, J. H. 1970.  Selective toxicity and mode of
       action of phoxim and related esters in insects and
       mammals.  Ph.D. Thesis, University of California,
       Riverside, California

842.    Keppler, W. J., et  al. 1965.  Laboratory evaluation
       of certain larvicTdes against Culex pipiens, Linn,
       Anopheles albimanus Wied and- Anopheles quadrimaculatus
       Say.   Mosquito News  25:415-419

-------
843.   Hoskins, W. M. 1964.  The metabolism of DDT in insects.
       World Rev. Pest Control 3:85-96

844.   Agosin, M., et  al. 1963.  Intermediary carbohydrate
       metabolism in Tria"toma infestans (Insecta; Hemiptera)-
       II.  The metabolism of Cl4-»glucose in Triatoma infestan
       nymphs and the effect of DDT.  Comp. Biochem. Phvsiol.
       8:311-320

845.   Trehenre, J. E. 1957.  Glucose absorption in the
       cockroach.  J. Exp. Biol. 34:478-485

846.   Georghiou, G. P. et  al. Joint action of diquat and
       related one-electron transfer agents with propoxur
       and fenthion against mosquito larvae.  J. Econ. Entomol
       67(2):184-186

847.   Cohen, A. J., et  al. 1960.  Comparative detoxication:
    /   the enzymic conjunction of chloro compounds with
       glutathione in locusts and other insects.  Biochem.
       J. 90:457

848.   Sanchez, F. F. 1965.  Factors affecting the latent
       toxicity of aldrin, DDT, and heptachlor to resistant
       and susceptible strains of the house fly.  Ph.D.
       Thesis, Univ. of Hawaii

849.   Kanehisa, T. 1957.  Tests of chemical substances and
       specific genes for their effects on tumor incidence
       in D. Melanogaster.  The Am. Nat. 41(861):393-396

850.   Matsumura, F., et  al. 1967.  Effect of sesamex upon
       dieldrin resistance~Tn the german cockroach.  J. Econ.
       Entom. 60(4):942-944

851.   Gadallah, A. J., et  al. 1972.  Effects of thiotepa on
       ribosomal protein of house fly eggs.  J. Econ. Entomol.
       65(4):1176-1178

852.   Al-Adil, K. M., et  al. 1973.  Effects of orally
       ingested aflatoxin BI on nucleic acids and ribosomes
       of house fly ovaries.  Tox. App.  Pharm. 26:130-136

853.   Al-Adil, K. M. et  al. 1972.  Biochemical effect of
       metepa on house fly eggs.  J. Econ. Entomol. 65(2):
       321-324

854.   Atkins, E. L., Jr., and Anderson, L. D. 1962.  DDT
       resistance in honey bees.  J. Econ. Entom. 55:792

-------
855.    Sternburg,  J.,  et  al.  1954.   DDT dehydrochlorinase,
       an enzyme found in DDT  - resistant flies.   Agr.  Food
       Chem.  2(22) -.1125-1130

856.    Oppenoorth,  F.  J.  and Van Asperen, K.  1960.  Allelic
       genes  in the housefly producing modified enzymes that
       cause  organophosphate resistance.  Sci.  132:298

857.    Brown, A. W. A. 1968.  Insecticide resistance comes
       of age.  Entomol.   Soc. 14:3-9

858.    Darlington,  W.  A., Partos, R.  D., and  Ratts,  K.  W.
       1971.   Correlation of cholinesterase inhibition and
       toxicity in insects and mammals.  Tox. and App.
       Phar.  18:542-547

859.    Guilbault,  G.  G., et  al. 1970.  Enzymatic methods of
       analysis trace ana. of  various pesticides with insect
       cholinesterase.  Anal.  Chim.  Acta. 52:75-82

860.    Guilbault,  G.  G. 1970.   Purification and properties of
       cholinesterases from honeybees.  J. Agr. Food Chem.
       18(4):692-697

861.    Sadar, M. H.,  et  al. 1970.  Trace analysis of pesti-
       cides  using cholinesterase from human serum,  rat
       liver, electric eel, bean leaf beetle and white
       fringe beetle.   Anal. Chem. 40 (14)-.1770-1775

862.    Harlow, P.  A.  1958.  The action of drugs on the
       nervous system of the locust  (Locusta migratoria).
       Ann. App. Bio.  46(l):55-73

863.    Dolensek, D. P. 1971.  Necrospy techniques in reptiles.
       J.A.V.M.A.  159(11):1616-1617

864.    Potter, R.  L., and Hadley, M. E. 1969.  Comparative
       effects of sulfhydryl inhibitors on melanosome
       movements within vertebrate melanophores.  Experienta
       26(5):536-538

865.    Dimond, J.  B., Kadunce, R. E., and Getchell, A. S.
       1968.   DDT residue persistence in red-backed sala-
       manders in a natural enviornment.  Env. Contain, and
       Tox. Bull.  3(4) .-194-202

866.    Friess, S.  L.  1972.  Irreversibility in nerve node
       inactivation by teriary vs. quaternary aminoesters.
       Tox. and App. Phar.  22:208-212

-------
867.   Harris, A. J., and Miledi, R. 1971.  The effect of
       type D botulinum toxin on frog neuromuscular junctions.
       J. Physiol. 217:497-515

868.   Votava, Z. 1967.  Pharmacology of the central cholin-
       ergic synapses.  Ann. Rev. of Phar. 4:223-236

869.   Camougis, G. , and Davis, W. 1971.  A comparative study
       of the neuropharmacological basis of action of
       pyrethrins. Pyreth. Post  11(1):  7-14

870.   Pendleton, R. , ejt  al. 1968.  The effect of a ben-
       zothiodiazide on the isolated toad bladder.  J. Phar.
       and Exp. Ther. 164 (2):348-361

871.   Fingal, W., and Kaplan, H. M. 1963.  Susceptibility of
       Xenopus laevis to copper sulfate.  Copeia  (1):155-156

872.   Wilber, C. G. 1954.   Toxicity of sarin in bullfrogs.
       Science 120:322

873.   Joiner, G. N., and Abrams, G. D. 1970.  Tuberculosis
       in the leopard frog  (Rana pipiens).  J. of Infectious
       Diseases 122(1 & 2)96-99

874.   Setliff, J. A., et  al. 1971.  Effect of ciquatoxin
       on sodium transport across the frog skin.  Tox. and
       App. Phar. 18:676-684

875.   Ussing, H. H., and Zerahn, K. 1951.  Active transport
       of sodium as the source of electric current in the
       short-circuited isolated frog skin.  Acta.  Physiol.
       Scand. 23:110-127

876.   Robertson, D. R. 1970.  The ultimobranchial body in
       Rana pipiens XI.  Response to increased dietary
       calcium - evidence of possible physiological function.
       Endocrinology 87 (5):1041-1050

877.   Woodwell, G. M., et  al. 1967.  DDT residues in an
       e-ast coast estuary:   a case of biological concentration
       of a persistent insecticide.  Sci. 156:821-824

378.   Dindal, D. L. 1968.   Kinetics of CL36 DDT in wild
       waterfowl.  Ph.D.  Thesis, Ohio State University,
       final report on Contract 14-16-0008-685 between
       Dept. of Interior and O.S.U. Research Foundation

879.   Khera, K. S., eŁ  al. 1965.  Toxic effects in duck-
       lings hatched from embryos inoculated with E.P.N.
       for systox.  Fed.  Cosmet. Tox 3:581-586

-------
880.    Switzer,  B.,  and Lewin,  V.  1971.   Shell  thickness,
     .  DDE levels in eggs,  and  reproductive success  in
       common terns  (Sterna hirundo)  in Alberta.   Can. J.
       Zool.  49;69-73

881.    Bailey, S.,  and Bunyan,  P.  J.  1972.   Interpretation
       of persistence and effects  of  polychlorinated
       biphenyls in  birds.   Nature 236:34-36

882.    Findlay,  G.  M., and De Freitas,  A.  S. W. 1971.   DDT
       movement from adipocyte  to  muscle cell during lipid
       utilization.   Nature 229:63-65

883.    Peakall,  D.  V. 1969.  Effect of  DDT on calcium
       uptake and vitamin D metabolism  in birds.   Nature
       224:1219-1220

884.    Jefferies, D. J., and French,  M.  C.  1971.   The effect
       of p,p"-DDT on the rate,  amplitude and weight of the
       pigeon and Bengalese finch. Br.  Poult.  Sci.  12:387-
       399

885.    Revzin, A. M. 1966.   Effects of  endrin on telecephalic
       function in the pigeon.   Tox.  App. Pharm.  9(l):75-83

886.    Gill,  J.  A.  1970.  Toxicities  of DDE and some other
       analogs of DDT to pheasants.  Journal of Wildlife
       Management 34(1):223-226

887.    Simpson, C.  F., et  al.  1972.   Effect of long-term
       feeding of DDT to turkeys.   Bulletin of Envir. Contain.
       Tox. 7(5):277-283

888.    Bradfield, P. L. 1972.  Robin  population changes and
       pesticide transformation after methoxychlor replaces
       DDT for control of dutch elm disease.  Ph.D. Thesis,
       Michigan State University,  East Lansing, Michigan

889.    Sodergren, A., and Ulfstrand,  S. 1972.  DDT and PCB
       relocate when caged robins  use fat reserves.  Ambio.
       1:36-40

890.    Stickel, W. H., et  al.  1973.   Toxicity and persis-
       tence of mirex in birds, pp 437-467  in Pesticides
       and the Environment;  A. Continuing Controversy, ed.
       by W.  B. Deichman.  -Intercontinental Medical Book
       Corp., New York

891.  '  Beckman, H. et  al. 1966.  An improved method  for the
       analysis of DDT and its metabolites  in eggs.   J. Assoc,
       official analytical chemists 49-:996-999

-------
892.   Flick, D. F. , and O'Dell, R. G. 1971.  A chick
       bioassay for oral diuretics.  Tox. and App. Phar.
       19:29-36

893.   Abou-Donia, M. B. and D. B. Menzel 1968.  The metabo-
       lism in vivo of l,l,l-trichloro-2,2-bis(P-chlorophenyl)
       ethane (DDT), l,l-Dichloro-2,2-bis (p-chlorophenyle)
       ethane (ODD) and l-dichloro-2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)
       ethane (DDE) in the chick by embryonic injection and
       dietary ingestion.  Biochem. Pharm. 17:2142-2161

894.   McChesney, E. W., and Banks, W. F., Jr. 1963.  Toxi-
       city and physiological dispostion of sodium-p-N-
       glycolylarsanilate.  II. Absorption, excretion and
       metabolism in the chicken.  Tox. and App. Phar.
       5:702-718

895.   Granett, S. E. S. 1972.  Perturbations of metabolism
       in chick brain induced by hyperphenylolanemia and
       galactosemia.  Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State Univer-
       sity.

896.   Landauer, W. 1947.  Insulin-induced abnormalitries
       of beak extremities and eyes in chickens.  J. Exp.
       Zoo. 105(2):145-172

897.   Landauer, W. 1952.  Malformation of chicken embryos
       produced by boric acid and the probable role of
       riboflavin in their origin.  J. Exp. Zoo. 120(3):
       464-508

898.   Landauer, W. 1948.  The effect of nicotinamide and
       «t-Ketoglutaric acid on the teratogenic action of
       insulin.  J. Exp. Zoo. 109:283-290

899.   Puyear, R. L., and Paulson, G. D. 1972.  Effect of
       Carbaryl  (1-Napththyl N-Methylcarbamate) on pento-
       barbital-induced sleeping time and some liver micro-
       somal enzymes in white leghorn cockerels.  Tox. and
       App. Phar. 22:621-627

900.   Platonow, N. S., and Funnell, H. S. 1972.  The
       distribution and some effects of polychlorinated
       biphenyls  (Aroclor 1254) in cockerels during pro-
       longed feeding trial.  Can. J. Comp. Med. 36:89-93

901.   Mull, R.  L., et  al. 1972.  Effects of an acutely
       toxic dose of the avicide 3-chloro-p-toluidine in
       chickens.  Tox. and App. Phar. 22:458-464

-------
902.    Richert,  E.  P.,  and Prahlad,  K.  V.  1972.   Effects of
       DDT and its  metabolities on thyroid of the Japanese
       quail,  Coturnix  coturnix japonica.   Poultry Sci.  51:
       196-200

903.    Wright, P. L.  1947.  The sexual  cycle of  the male
       long-tailed  weasel (Mustela frenata)  J. Mamm.
       28(4):343-352

904.    Buckner,  C.  H. 1964.   Metabolism, food capacity,  and
       feeding behavior in four species of shrews.  Can. J.
       Zoo. 42:259-279

905.    Morrison, P. R. , ejt  al. 1953.   Physiological
       observations on  a small shrew.   Am. Physiol. Soc. Fed.
       Proced. 12:100-101

906.''  Morrison, P. R.  1948.  Oxygen consumption in several
       mammals under basal conditions.   J. Cell. Comp.
       Physiol.  31:281-291

907.    Kendeigh, S. J.  1945.  General notes.  J. Mamm. 26:
       86-87

908.    Jefferies, D.  J. 1972.  Organochlorine insecticide
       residues in  British bats and their significance.
       J. Zool., London 166:245-263

909.    Souma,  J. A.,  et  al. 1972.  The effect of cis- and
       trans-clomiphene citrate on the collagen content of
       fetal bone.   Tox. and App.  Phar. 23:339-343

910.    Gordon, G. R., and Peters,  J. H. 1967.  Plasma
       histaminase  activity in various mammalian species:
       a rapid method of assay.  Soc. Exp. Bio.  Med. 124:
       399-404

911.    Hollingsworth, R. L. , et.  al. 1971.  Fetal rabbit
       ductus arteriosus assessedTn a teratologicai study
       on isoproterenol and metaproterenol.  Tox. and
       App. Phar. 18:231-234

912.    Schardein, J.  L., et  al. 1971.   Teratogenesis studies
       with diphenhydramine HCi.  Tox.  and App.  Phar. 18:
       971-976

913.    Palmer, A. K.  1968.  Spontaneous malformations of  the
       New Zealand white rabbit:  the background to safety
       evaluation tests.  Lab. Animal 2:195-206

-------
914.   Capizzo, F. , and Roberts, R. J. 1971. ^-Napthyliso-
       thiocynate (ANIT)-induced hepatotoxicity and dis-
       position in various species.  Tox. and App. Phar.
       19:176-187

915.   Foulkes, E. C. 1971.  Glomerular filtration and_ renal
       plasma flow in uranium-poisoned rabbits.  Tox. and
       App. Phar. 20:380-385

916.   McDonald, T. 0., et  al. 1972.  Ocular toxicity of
       ethylene chlorohydrin and ethylene glycol in rabbit
       eyes.  Tox. and App. Phar. 21:143-150

917.   Gowdey, C. W. , et.  al. 1954.  The pharmacological
       properties of the insecticide dieldrin.  Can. J.
       Biochem. and Physiol.  32:498-503

918.   Pennington, K., and Fuerst, R. 1971.  Biochemical
       and morphological effects of various gases on rabbit
       erythocytes.  Arch. Env. Health 22:476

919.   Goodwin, L. G., et  al. 1957.  The toxicity of
       diaminodiphenoxyalkanes.  Brit. J. Pharm. 12:468-474

920.   Luisada, A., e_t  al. 1944.  A comparative study of
       electrocardiogram and heart sounds in common and
       domestic mammals.  Cardiologia 8:64-84

921.   Banta, C. A., e_t  al. 1972.  A low-cost electronic
       cardiac auscultation device for monitoring rabbits
       under general anesthesia.  Lab. An. Sci. 22(3):402-
       403.

922.   Fritz, T. E. , et  al^.1968.  A central nervous system
       disorder in ground squirrels  (Citellus tridecemlineatus
       associated with visceral larva migrams.  J.A.V.M.A.
       153(7):841-844

923.   McKeever, S. 1959.  Effects of reproductive activity
       on the weight of adrenal glands in Microtus montanus.
       Anat. Rec. 135:1-5

924.   Louch, C. D. 1958.  Adrenocortical activity in two
       meadow vole populations.  J. Mamm 39(1):109-116

925.   Street, J. C., and Blau, A. D. 1966.  Insecticide
       interactions affecting residue accumulation in
       animal tissue.  Tox. App. Pharm. 8:497-504

-------
926.    Grant,  D.  L. ,  Phillips,  W.  E.  J.,  and Villeneuve,  D.  C.
       1971.   Metabolism of a polychlorinated biphenyl
       (Aroclor 1254)mixture in the rat.   Env.  Contain, and
       Tox. Bull.  6 (2)-.102-112

927.    Roszowski,  A.  P., and Kelley,  N. M. 1963.   A rapid
       method for assessing drug inhabition of feeding be-
       havior.  J. Phar. and Exp.  Ther. 140:367-374

928.    Gargus, J.  L. , e_t  al. 1969.  Utilization of newborn
       mice in the bioassay of chemical carcinogens.  Tox.
       and App. Phar. 15:552-559

929.    Dorfman, R. I.,  and Dorfman, A.  S. 1955.  Estrogen
       contamination in animal food.   Proc. An. Care Panel
       6:16-18

930.    Cordes, C.  L.  1971.  Comparative study of the uptake,
       storage, and loss of DDT in small  mammals.  Ph.D.
       Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh

931.    Pekas, J.  C.  1971.  Uptake and transport of pesticidal
       carbamates by everted sacs of rat  small intestine.
       Can. J. of Physiol. and Pharmacol.  49(1):14-21

932.    Phillips,  W.  E.  J. 1962.  Low-temperature environmental
       stress and the metabolism of vitamin A in the rat.
       Can. J. Biochem. and Physiol.  40:491-499

933.    Dale, W. E., Gaines, T. B., and Hayes, W. J. 1962.
       Storage and excretion of DDT in starved rats.  Tox.
       and App. Phar. 4:89-106

934.    McLean, H. E. M., and McLean, E. K. 1966.  The effect
       of diet and l,l,l-Trichloro-2,2-bis-(p-chlorophenyl)-
       ethane  (DDT)  on microsomal hydroxylating enzymes  and
       on sensitivity of rats to carbon tetrachloride
       poisoning.  Biochem. J. 100:564-571

935.    Budny, J. A. 1972.  Metabolism and blood pressure
       effects of disodium nitrolotriacetate  (Na2NTA) in
       dogs.  Tox. and App. Phar. 22:655-660

936.    Watrous, W. M., and Plaa, G. L. 1972.  Effect  of
       halogenated hydrocarbons on organic ion accumulation
       by renal cortical slices of rats and mice."   Tox.  and
       and App. Phar. 22:528-543

937.    Aronson, A.L., and Ahrens,F.A. 1971.  The mechanism
       of renal transport and excretion of ethylenediaminete-
       traacetate with  interspecies comparisons.  Tox. and
       App. Phar. 18:1-9

-------
938.   Epstein, S. S. , et  al. 1970.  Carcinogenicity testing
       of selected food additives by parental administration
       to infant Swiss mice.  Tox. and App. Phar. 16:321-334

939.   Smyth, J. F. , Jr., et.  al. 1970.  Oral toxicity and
       excretion of four commercial polyoxyalkylene glycol
       compounds.  Tox. and App. Phar. 16:675-680

940.   Levander, O. A., Young, M. L., and Meeks, S. A. 1970.
       Studies on the binding of selenium by liver homo-
       genates from rats fed diets containing either casein
       or casein plus linseed oil meal.  Tox. and App. Phar.
       16:79-87

941.   Kolmodin-Hedman, B. 1971.  Effect of exposure to
       lindane on drug metabolism decreased hexobarbital
       sleeping-times and increased antipyrine disappearance
       rate in rats.  Tox. and App. Phar. 20:299-307

942.   McChesney, E. W., et  al. 1962.  Toxicity and physio-
       logical disposition of sodium p-N-Glyoclylarsanilate.
       I.  Observations in the mouse, cat, rat and man.
       Tox. and App. Phar. 4:14-23

943.   Neal, R. A. 1967.  Studies on the metabolism of diethyl
       4-Nitrophenyl phosphorothionate (parathion) in vitro.
       Biochem J. 103:183-191

944.   Balazs, T., et  al. 1963.  Renal tests in toxicity
       studies on rats.  Tox. and App. Phar. 5:661-674

945.   Ellis, R. W., and Fang, S. C. 1973.  The metabolism
       of t^" C] lactate by rat kidney slices after acute
       mercurial intoxication.  Tox. and App. Phar. 24:
       230-238

946.   Gemmill, C. L. 1965.  The metabolism, pulse rate and
       body temperature of normal, thyroidectomized and
       hypermetabolic rats.  Lab. An. Care 15(5):329-335

947.   Conney, A. H., et  al. 1967.  Effects of pesticides
       on drug and steroid metabolism.  Clinical Pharm. and
       Therap. 8(1): pt. 1:2-10

948.   Laug, E. P., et  al. 1950.  Liver cell alteration and
       DDT storage in the fat of the rat induced by dietary
       levels of 1 to 50 ppm DDT.  J. Pharm. and Exp. Ther.
       98(3):268-273

-------
949.   Ludwig, G.,  et  al.  1964.   Excretion and distribution
       of Aldrin 14C and its metabolites after orad admini-
       stration for a long  period of time.   Life Sci.  3(2):
       123-130

950.   Nakatsugawa, T.,  et.  al.  1969,   Degradation of  para-
       thion in the rat. Biochem. Pharm. 18,  1103-1114

951.   Kato, R., and Gillette,  J. R. 1965.   Effect of
       starvation on NADPH-dependent enzymes in liver
       microsomes of male and female rats.   J. Pharm.  Exp.
       Ther. 150(2):279-284

952.   Courtney, K. D.,  et   al.  1970.   Teratogenic evaluation
       of 2,4,5-T.   Science 168:864-866

953.   Epstein, S.  S.,  and  Shafner, H. 1968.  Chemical
       mutagens in the human environment.  Nature 219:385-
       387

954.   Courtney, K. D.,  and Moore, J.  A. 1971.  Teratology
       studies with 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid and
       2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.  Tox. and App.
       Phar. 20:396-403

955.   Posner, H. S., et  al. 1969.  Anomalies of the inter-
       nal organs and diminished calcification of vertebrae
       in fetuses after benzhydrylpiperazine treatment of
       pregnant rats.  Tox. and App. Phar. 17:76-82

956.   Brown, A. M. 1965.  Pharmacogenetics of the mouse.
       Lan. An. Care 15 (2):111-118

957.   Wallcave, J., Garcia, H., Feldman, R., et  al. 1971.
       Skin tumorigenesis in mice by petrolium asphalts and
       coal-tar pitches of known polynuclear aromatic
       hydrocarbon content.  Tox. and App. Phar. 18:41-52

958.   Woodard, G., et  al. 1973.   Xanthan gum:  safety
       evaluation by two-year feeding studies in rats and
       dogs and a three-generation  reproduction study in
       rats.  Tox. and App. Phar. 24:30-36

959.   Thayer, P. S., and Kensler,  C. J. 1973.  Genetic tests
       in mice of caffeine alone  and  in  combination with
       mutagens.  Tox.  and App. Phar. 25:157-168

960.   Hagen, E. C., Jenner, P. M., Jones, W. I. 1971.
       Increased lethal effects of  acutely administered
       anticholinesterases in female  rats prefed with
       similar agents.  Tox. and  App. Phar. 18:235-237

-------
961.   Su, M. Q., et  al. 1971.  Comparative inhibition of
       aliesterases and cholinesterase in rats fed eighteen
       organophosphorus insecticides.  Tox. and App. Phar.
       20:241-249

962.   Annau, E., Konst, H., and Plummer, P. J. G. 1956.
       Biochemical and historical changes in the liver of
       mice following feeding of the insecticide aldrin.
       Can. J. Med. Sci. 30:463-470

963.   Rice, A. J., and Plaa, G. L. 1969.  The role of
       triglyceride accumulation and of necrosis in the
       hemodynamic responses of the isolated perfused rat
       liver after administration of carbon tetrachloride.
       Tox. and App. Phar. 14:151-162

964.   Williams, C. H. 1969.  B-Glucuronidase activity in
       the serum and liver of rats administered pesticides
       and hepatoxic agents.  Tox. and App. Phar. 14:283-292

966.   Stock, B. H., and Fouls, J. R. 1971.  The influence
       of in vivo administration of dimethyl sulfoxide on
       the~Tn vitro metabolism of some monocyclic aromatic
       chemicals by hepatic microsomal preparations.  Tox.
       and App. Phar. 18:859-868

967.   Williams, C. H. 1970.  B-Glucuronidase activity in
       the serum and liver of rats treated with parathion.
       Tox. and App. Phar. 16:533-539

968.   Lai, H., et  al. 1970.  Impairment of hepatic drug
       metabolism by carbon tetrachloride inhalation.  Tox.
       and App. Phar. 16:35-39

969.   Slater, T. F., and Delaney, V. B. 1971.  The effects
       of various drugs and toxic agents on bile flow rate
       and composition in the rat.  Tox. and App. Phar.
       20:157-174

970.   Nishie, K., et  al. 1972.  Phototoxicity and differen-
       tial hepatotoxiclty as biological indicators of
       nitrosamine activity.  Tox. and App. Phar. 23:680-691

971.   Kutob, S. D., and Plaa, G. L. 1962.  A procedure for
       estimating the hepatotic potential of certain
       industrial solvents.  Tox. and App. Phar. 4:354-361

972.   Hart, L. G., Shultice, R. W., and Fouts, J. R. 1963.
       Stimulatory effects of chlordane on hepatic micro-
       somal drug metabolism in the rat.  Tox. and App.
       Phar. 5:371-386

-------
973.   Evans,  E.  A.,  Eisenlord,  A.  G.,  and Hine,  C.  H.  1963.
       Studies in detoxication by means of the isolated
       perfused liver.   Tox and  App.  Phar. 5:129-141

974.   Kimbrough, R.  D., et.  al. 1968.   Combined  effect of
       DDT, pyrethrum,  and piperonyl  butoxide on  rat liver.
       Arch, Env. Health 16:333-341

975.   Mischler,  T.  W.,  et  al.  1971.   Biological evaluation
       of two estrogenic steroids as  possible rodent chemo-
       sterilants.  Journal of Wildlife Mgmt. 35(3):449-454

976.   Howard, W. E., and Marsh, R. E.  1969.   Mestranol as a
       reproductive  inhibitor in rats and voles.   Journal of
       Wildlife Management 33(2):403-408

977.   Clark,  D.  G.  1972.  Effects of ethylene glycol dini-
       trate on pituitary-adrenocortical function in the
       rat.  Tox. and App. Phar. 21:355-360

978.   Szot, R. J.,  and Murphy,  S.  D.  1970.  Phenobarbital
       and dexamethasone inhibition of the adrenocortical
       response of rats to toxic chemicals and other
       stresses.   Tox.  and App.  Phar.  17:761-773

979.   DiFazio, C. A.,  Green, C. D.,  and Smiddy,  J.  F. 1969.
       Comparative in vitro effects of nitrous oxide, halo-
       thane and cyclopropane on rat bone marrow oxygen
   V   consumption and anaerobic glycolysis.   Tox. and App.
       Phar. 14:259-265

980.   Wenzel, D. G., et  al. 1970.  Effects of nicotine on
       cultured rat heart cells.  Tox. and App. Phar. 17:
       774-785

981.   Clark, D.  G.  1970.  The supersensitivity of the rat
       cardiovascular system to epinephrine after repeated
       injections of ethylene glycol dinitrate.  Tox. and
       App. Phar. 17:433-442

982.   Khairy, M. 1960.  Effect of chronic diedrin ingestion
       on the muscular efficiency of rats.  Brit. J. Indus.
       Med. 17:146-148

983.   Tullner, W. W. 1961.  Uterotrophic action of the
       insecticide methoxychlor.  Science 133:647-648

984.   Dale, W. E., et  al. 1963.  Poisoning by DDT:
       relation between clinical signs and concentration  in
       rat brain.  Science 142:1474-1476

-------
985.   Joyce, D., and Suinmerfield, A. 1966.  Effects of
       drugs related to serotonin on water intake and de-
       fecation  in rats.  Implications for behavioral
       studies.  Arch. Int. Phar. 161(2):489-494

986.   Egle, J.  L., Jr. 1972.  Effects of inhaled acetal-
       dehyde and propionaldehyde on blood pressure and
       heart rate.  Rox. and App. Phar.  23 (1972):131-135

987.   Murphy, S. D. , e_t  al. 1964.  Biochemical effects in
       rats from irritating air contaminants.  Tox. and
       App. Phar. 6:520-528

988.   Chevillard, L., et  al. 1967.  The influence of
       rearing temperature on some physiological character-
       istics of small laboratory animals  (Homoeotherms).
       Husb. Lab. An. 395-445

989.   Farkas, I., Desi, I., and Kemeny, T. 1968.  The effect
       of DDT in the diet on the resting and loading electro-
       corticogram record.  Tox. and App. Phar. 12:518-525

990.   Crecitelli, F. N., and Oilman, A. 1946.  Electrical
       manifestations of the cerebellum and cerebral cortex
       following DDT administrations in cats and monkeys.
       Am. J. Physiol. 147:127-137

991.   De"si, I., et. al. 1962.  Nervous system effects of a
       chemical herbicide.  Arch. Env. Health 4:95-102

992.   Steward,  C. N., Coursin, D. B. and Bhagavan, H. N.
       1972.  Electroencephalographic study of L-glutamate
       induced sugars in rats.  Tox. and App. Phar. 23:
       635-639

993.   De"si, I., et  al. 1966.  Changes of central nervous
       functions in response to DDT administration Acta.
       Physiol. Acad. Scientiarium Hungaricae Tomus 30(3-4):
       275-282

995.   Clark, R. 1969.  A rapid method for testing anti-
       appetite drugs in mice.  Tox. and App. Phar. 15:
       212-215

996.   Kaplan, M. L. 1972.  Effect of acrylamide on rotarod
       performance and sciatic nerve B-Glucuronidase activity
       of rats.  Tox. and App. Phar. 22:259-268

997.   Hrdina, P. D., et  al. 1973.  Some neurochemical
       alterations during acute DDT poisoning.  Tox. and
       App. Phar. 25:276-288

-------
 998.   Woolley, D.  E.  1973.   Studies on 1,1,1-trichloro-
        2, 2-bis- (p-chlorophenyl)  ethane (DDT) -induced
        hyper thermia:   effects of cold exposure and amino-
        pyrine injections.   J. Pharm. and Exper. therapeutics
        184(1) :261-268

 999.   Gilbert, F.  F.  1969.   Physiological effects of natural
        DDT residues and metabolites on ranch mink.  Journal
        of Wildlife Management 33 (4) :933-943

1000.   Travis, H. F. ,  and Schaible, P. J. 1962.  Effects of
        diethylstilbestrol fed periodically during gestation
        of female mink upon reproductive and kit performance.
        Am. J. Vet.  Res. 23 (93) : 359-361

1001.   Balazs, T. ,  et  al. 1971.  Renal concentration test
        in beagle dogs.  Lab.  An. Sci. 21(4)

1002.   Vogin, E. E. ,  and Bokelman, D. L. 1971.  The in-
        fluence of experimentally induced hepatoxicity on
        the pr.essor responses  to  vasoactive substances in
        beagle' dogs.  Tox. and App. Phar. 20:291-298

1003.   Henry, M. C. ,  Davis, R. D. , and Schein, P. S. 1973.
        Hepatotoxicity of 1- (2-chlorethyl) -3-cyclohexyl-l-
        nitrosourea (CCNU) in dogs.  Tox. and App. Phar.
        25:410-417

1004 •   DeMarr, E. W.  J. 1956.  Effects of chlorpromazine on
        EEC and its activation.  Fed. Am. Soc. for Exp. Bio.,
        Fed. Proc. 15:416
1005.   Fundarburk, W. H. , Hixs, E. E. f and Unna, 1C. R.
        Pharmacological properties of benzaTiole, III.  Effect
        of 2-Aminobenzothiazoles on the electroencephalogram.
        J. Phar. and Exp. Ther. 108:94

1006.   Beliles, R. P. 1971.  The subchronic toxicity of 5-
        Benzyl-11- [4- (N-nathylpiperidylene) ] -5 , 6-dihydromor-
        phanthridine hydrogen maleate.  Tox. and App. Phar.
        18:451-456             ''

1007.   Goldman, W. J. , Bielinski, and Mattis, P. A. 1973.
        Cochlear microphonic potential response of the dog
        to diuretic compounds.  Tox. and App. Phar. 25:259-
        266.

1008.   Daigneault, E. A. 1970.  Influence of ototoxic drugs
        on acetylcholine-induced depression of, the Cochlear
        N potential.  Tox. and App. Phar. 17:223-230

-------
1009.   Funakoshi, M., and Zotterman, Y. 1963.  Effect of
        salt on sugar response.  Acta. Physiol. Scan. 57:193

1010.   Liljestrand, G. and Zotterman, Y. 1954.  The water
        taste in mammals.  Acta. Physiol. Scand. 32:291-303

1011.   Cohen, M. J., et  al. 1955.  The response spectrum of
        taste fibers in the cat:  a single fibre analysis.
        Acta. Physio. Scand. 33:316-332

1012.   Daigneault, E. A. 1972.  Correlation of prolonged
        insecticide exposure and the activity of the in-
        hibition of Cochlea N potential.  Tox. and App. Phar.
        21:495-502

1013.   Owen, G., et  al. 1970.  Toxicity of some benzodaize-
        pine compounds with CNS activity.  Tox. and App. Phar.
        16:556-570

1014.   Fries, G. F., Marrow, G. S., and Gordon, C. H. 1972.
        Similarity of a polychlorinated biphenyl (Arochor
        1254) and DDE in rate of elimination from cows.  Env.
        Contam. and Tox. Bull. 7(4):252

1015.   Harris, J. R., et  aJ.1956.  Effects of feeding
        dieldrin and heptachlor-treated alfalfa hay to dairy
        cows.  J. Agr. Food Chem.  4(8):694-696

1016.   Bruce, W. N. , e_t  al. 1965.  Storage of heptachlor
        epoxide in the body fat and its excretion in milk if
        dairy cows are fed heptachlor in their diets.  J.
        Agr. Food Chem. 13:63-67

1017.   Kuhnen, H. 1971.  Activating and inhibitory effects
        of bispyridinum compounds on bovine red cell acetyl-
        cholinesterase.  Tox. and App. Phar. 20:97-104

1018.   Hamlin, R. L., Smetzer, D. L., and Smith, C. R. 1965
        Analysis of QRS complex recorded through a semi-
        orthogonal lead system in the horse.  Am. J. Physiol.
        207:325-333

1019.   Garner, H. E., et  al. 1972.  Electrodes for
        recording cortical electroencephalograms in ponies.
        Lab. An. Sci. 22 (2) .-262-265

1020.   Herigstad, R. R. 1972.  Pathology of inorganic and
        organic selenium toxicosts in young swine.   Ph.D.
        Thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing,
        Michigan

-------
1021.   Hamlin, R. L. 1960.   The QRS electrocardiogram
        epicardiogram, vectorcardiogram and ventricular
        excitation of swine.  Am. J. Physiol. 198:537-542

1022.   Bay, W. W., et  al.  1970.  The experimental production
        and evaluation of drug-induced phototoxicity in swine.
        Tox. and App. Phar.  17:538-547

1023.   Hebert, D. M., and Cowan, I. M.  White muscle disease
        in the mountain goat.  Journal of Wildlife Management
        35(4):752

1024.   Barber, T. A. 1971.   Influence of pesticides on mule
        deer rumen bacteria.  Ph.D. Thesis, Colorado State
        University

1025.   Dalezios, J. I. et  al. 1973.  Excretion and metabo-
        lism of orally adminritered aflatoxin B^ by rhesus
        monkeys.Fd. Cosmet.  Toxicol.11:605-616

1026.   Vondruska, J. F., et  al. 1971.  An investigation
        into the teratogenic potential of captan, folpet
        and difolatan in nonhuman primates.  Tox. and App.
        Phar. 18:691-624

1027.   Werdegar, D., Johnson, D. G., and Mason, J. W. 1964.
        A technique for continuous measurement of arterial
        blood pressure in unanesthetized monkeys.  J. App.
        Physiol. 19:519-521

1028.   Rothstein, R., and Hunsaker, D., II. 1972.  Baseline
        hematology and blood chemistry in the South American
        wooly opossum.  Caluromys derbianus.  Lab. An. Sci.
        22(2):227-232

1029.   Barnes, R. D., and Barthold, S. W. 1969.  Reproduction
        and breeding behavior in an experimental colony  of
        Marmosa mitis Bangs  (Didelphidae).  J. Reprod. Pert.
        Suppl. 6:447-482

1030.   Szabuniewicz, M., and McCrady, J. D. 1969.  Some
        aspects of the anatomy and physiology of the
        armadillo.  Lab. An. Care  19 (6):843-848

1031.   Benitz, K. F., and Kramer, A. W., Jr. 1965.   Spon-
        taneous tumors in the Mongolian gerbil.  Lab.  An.
        Care 15(5):281-294

1032.   Hill, R. B.  1958.  The effects of certain neurohumors
        and of other  drugs  on the  ventricle  and  radula pro-
        tractor of Busycon  canaliculatum.   Biol. Bull.  115:
        471-482

-------
1033.   Hartman, M. J. 1971.  The effects of four anti-
        cholinesterase compounds on the embryology of Acheta
        domesticus.  Ph.D. Thesis, Oregon State University

1034.   Atkins, E. L. , Jr., et  al. 1954.  Equipment and
        techniques used in laboratory evaluation of pesticide
        dusts in toxicological studies with honeybees.  J.
        Econ. Entom. 47(6):965-969

1035.   Clausen, H. J., and Duran-Reynals, F. 1937.  Studies
        on the experimental infection of some reptiles,
        amphibia and fish with Serratia anolium.  Am. J.
        Path.  13:441-451

1036.   Cohen, N. 1971.  Reptiles as models for the study of
        immunity and its phylogenesis.  J.A.V.M.A., Vol. 159
        (11):1662

1037.   Gordon, R. E. and D. W. T.inkle 1959.  A technique for
        collecting reptile eggs.  Texas J. of Science 12(1-2):
        14-16

1038.   Greenfield, L. J., and Morrow, A. G. 1961.  The
        cardiovascular hemodynamics of Crocodilia.  J. of
        Surg. Rea. 1(2):97-103

1039.   Brisbin, I. L. , Jr. 1966.  Reactions of the American
        alligator to several immobilizing drugs.  Copeia (1):
        129-130

1040.   Hubbs, C. et  al. 1960.  Reduced survival of young
        etheostomatTne~f"ishes and Hylid tadpoles due to
        ammonia fumes produced by a rodent colony.  Copeia (1)

1041.   Cooke, A. S. 1973.  The effects of DDT, when used as
        a mosquito larvicide, on tadpoles of the frog  (Rana
        temporaria).  Envir. Poll. 5 (4):259-273

1042.   Blus, L. J., et  al. 1972.  Logarithmic relationship
        of DDT residues to eggshell thinning.  Nature 235:
        376-377

1043.   Blus, L. J. 1971.  Eggshell thinning in the brown
        pelican:  implication of DDT.   Bio. Sci. 21:1213-
        1215

1044.   Vermeer, K., and Risebrough, R. W. 1972.  Additional
        information on eggshell thickness in relation to DDE
        concentrations in great blue heron eggs.  Can. Field-
        Naturalist 86:384-385

-------
1045.   Borg, K.  et  al.  1970.   Experimental secondary methyl
        mercury poTsonTng in the goshawk (Accipiter gentilis)
        Envir. Poll.  1-91-104

1046.   Porter, R. D.,  and Wiemeyer, S.  N.  1969.   Dieldrin
        and DDT:   effects on sparrow hawk eggshells and
        reproduction.  Science 165:199-200
                i
1047.   Fox, G. A. 1971.   Recent changes in the reproductive
        success of the pigeon hawk.  Journal of Wildlife
        Management 35(1):122

1048.   Cade, T.  J. e_t  al. 1971.  DDE residues and eggshell
        changes in Alaskan falcons and hawks.  Sci. 172:955-
        957

1049.   Snyder, N. F. R., et  al. 1973.   Organochlorine,
        heavy metals, and biology of North American
        accipiters.  Bio. Sci. 23 (5):299-305

1050.   Kreitzer, J.  F. 1971.  Eggshell thickness in
        mourning dove populations.  J. Wildlife Mgmt. 35(3):
        563-564

1051.   Labisky, R. F. 1959.  Night-lighting:  a technique
        for capturing birds and mammals.  Illinois Nat.
        Hist. Survey, Bio. Notes No. 40

1052.   Klonglan, E. D., et  al. 1956.  Pheasant nest activity
        recording instrument.  Journal of Wildlife Manage-
        ment  20(2):173-177

1053. '  zwickel, F. C. and Bendell, J. F. 1967.  A snare  for
        capturing blue grouse.  J. of Wildlife Mgmt.  31(1):
        202-204

1054.   Schladweiler, P. and Mussehl, T. W.  1969.  Use of
        mist-nets for recapturing radio-equipped blue grouse.
        J. Wildlife Management  33 (2):443-444

1055.   Barnes, J. M. 1969.  Toxic  chemicals and peripheral
        neuropathy:  experimental studies.   Proc. Roy. Soc.
        Med.  62:205-208

1056.   Dunachie, J. F., and Fletcher, W. W. 1966.   Effect of
        some  insecticides on the hatching rate of hen's eggs.
        Nature 212:1062-1063

1057.   Guthrie, F.  E., and  Donaldson, W. E. 1970.   Distri-
        bution of DDT and dieldrin  in avian  embryo.   Tox.
        and App. Phar. 16:475-481

-------
1058.   Cecil, H. C. et  al. 1973.  Changes in eggshell
        quality and pesticide content of laying hens on
        pullets fed DDT in high or low calcium diets.
        Poultry Sci. 52(2):648-653

1059.   Smith, S. I., et  al. 1970.  The effect of injection
        of chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides on hatchability
        of eggs.  Tox. and App. Phar. 16:179-185

1060.   Marliac, J. P., and Mutchler, M. K. 1963.  Use of the
        chick embryo technique for detecting potential ef-
        fects of chemicals.  Fed. Proc. Am. Soc. Exp. Bio.
        22(1) :188

1061.   Thomas, F., and Medley, J. G. 1971.  Effect on eggs
        of applications to poultry of pesticide formulations
        contaminated with chlorinated hydrocarbons.  J. AOAC
        54(3):681-684

1062.   Thompson, E. M., et  al. 1967.  Methoxychlor residues
        in chicken eggs.  J. Econ. Entom. 60(1):235-237

1063.   Kreitzer, J. F. 1972.  The effect of embryonic
        development on the thickness of the eggshells of
        Coturnix quail.  Poultry Sci. 51:174-1765

1064.   Stickel, L. F., and Rhodes, L. I. 1970.  The bio-
        logical impact of pesticides in the environment.
        Envir. Health Sci. Series No. 1

1065.   Walker, N. E. 1967.  Growth and development of chick
        embryos nourished by fractions of yolk.  J. of
        Nutrition 92 (1):111-117

1066.   Stoewsand, G. S., et  al^. 1971.  Eggshell thinning in
        Japanese quail fed mercuric chloride.   Science 173:
        1030-1031

1067.   Jones, F. J. S., and Summers, D. D. B. 1968.  Relation
        between DDT in diets of laying birds and viability of
        their eggs.  Nature 217:1162-1163

1068.   MacLeod, C. F., and Lethiecq.  J. L. 1963.  A com-
        parison of two trapping procedures for Sorex
        cinereus.  J. Mamm. 44 (2):277-278

1069.   Spencer, A. W., and Pettus, D. 1966.  Habitat perfer-
        ences of five sympatric species of long-tailed shrews.
        Ecology 47:677-683

-------
1070.   Weil, C.  S., and Scala, R.  A.  1971.   Study of intra
        and interlaboratory variability in the results of
        rabbit eye and skin irritation tests.  Tox. and App.
        Phar. 19:276-360

1071.   Phillips, L., et  al. 1972.  A comparison of rabbit
        and human skin response to certain irritants.  Tox.
        and App.  Phar. 21:369-382

1072.   Grice, H. C. 1964.  Methods of obtaining blood and
        for intravenous injections in laboratory animals.
        Lab. An.  Care 14(6):483-493

1073.  •'' Vogin, E. E. , et  al. 1970.  Teratology studies in
        rats and rabbits exposed to an isoproterenol aerosol.
        Tox. and App. Phar. 16:374-381

1074.   Klemm, W. R. 1965.  Drug potentiation of hypnotic
        restraint of rabbits, as indicated by behavior and
        brain electrical activity.   Lab. An. Care 15(2):163-
        167

1075.   Marsh, R. E., et  al. 1970.  Effects of odors of
        rodenticides and adherents on attractiveness of oats
        to ground squirrels.  Journal of Wildlife Management
        34(4):821-825

1076.   Howard, W. E., et  al. 1969.  A body capacitor-
        olfactometer for squirrels and rats.  J. Mamm. 50(4):
        771-776

1077.   Dieterich, R. A. 1972.  Hematologic values for five
        northern Microtines.  Lab. An. Sci.  22 (3):390-392

1078.   Capizzo,  F., and Roberts, R. J. 1970.  Disposition
        of the hepatotoxin o^Napthylisothiocynate  (ANIT) in
        the rat.   Tox. and App. Phar 17:262-271

1079.   Deichmann, W. B., e_t  al. 1963.  The hemopoietic
        tissue toxicity of benzene vapors.   Tox.  and App.
        Phar. 5:201-224

1080.   Kociba, R. J., et  al. 1973.  Tissue response  to
        ceramic foam dust following intratracheal  and  intra-
        peritoneal administration.  Tox. and App.  Phar.
        25:145-151

1081.   Deichmann, W. B. 1970.  Tumorigenicity of  aldrin,
        dieldrin and endrin in the albino rat.   Ind. Med.
        39(10):37-45

-------
1082.   Munro, I. C., et  al. 1971.  Biochemical and patholo-
        gical changes in the heart and liver of rats given
        brominated cottonseed oil.  Tox. and App. Phar.
        19:62-70

1083.   Deichmann, W. B. , et  al. 1963.  Adenocarcinoma in
        the lungs of mice exposed to vapors of 3-nitro-3-
        hexene.  Tox. and App. Phar. 5:445-456

1084.   Sharratt, M., and Frazer, A. C. 1963.  The sensi-
        tivity of function tests in detecting renal damage
        in the rat.  Tox. and App. Phar. 5:36-38

1085.   Hoag, W. G., et  al. 1965.  Epidemiological aspects
        of the control of pseudomonas infection in mouse
        colonies.  Lab. An. Care 15 (3):217-223

1086.   Flynn, R. J., et  al. 1965.  Pathogen status of
        commercially produced laboratory mice.  Lab. An.
        Care 15(6):440-447

1087.   Brown, D. R., and Murphy, S. D. 1971.  Factors in-
        fluencing dimethoate and triethyl phosphate-induced
        narcotics in rats and mice.  Tox. and App. Phar.
        18:895-906

1088.   Williams, J. S., et  al. 1966.  Serum chemical com-
        ponents in mice determined by the use of ultramicro
        techniques.  J. App. Physiol. 21:1026-1030

1089.   Bergstrom, S. 1971.  A simple device for intravenous
        injections in the mouse.  Lab. An. Sci. 21(4)

1090. '"'  Puget, A. 1973.  The afgan pika (Ochotona rufescens):
        a new laboratory animal.  Lab. An. Sci. 23(2):248-251

1091.   Gate, C. C. 1969.  A successful method for exsanguin-
        ating unanesthetized mice.  Lab. An. Care 19:256-258

1092.   Heinecke, H. 1967.  The experimental environment and
        its influence on the blood picture of laboratory
        animals.  Husbandry of Laboratory Animals pp 447-457

1093.   Weil, C. S., et  al. 1972.  Current status of tests
        of carbaryl for reproductive and teratogenic effect.
        Tox. and App. Phar. 21:390-404

1094.   Tigner, J. R., and Bowles, W. A. 1964.  Chloropicrin
        tested as an area repellent for house mice.  Journal
        of Wildlife Management 28 (4):748-751

-------
1095.    Salthouse,  T.  N.,  et  al.  1973.   Microspectrophoto-
        meltry of macrophage lysosoraal enzyme  activity:   a
        measure of  polymer implant tissue toxicity.   Tox.
        and App. Phar. 25:201-211

1096.    Wittgenstein,  W.,  and Rowe, K. W., Jr.  1965.   A
        technique for  prolonged infusion of rats.   Lab.  An.
        Care 15(5) -.375-378

1097.    Lawrence, W. H.,  and Sherman,  C. A. 1963.   An
        electronic  traffic counter for recording burrow
        activity of the mountain beaver.  J. Mamm.  44(3):
        399-405

1098.    Pearson, A. M. et  al. 1967.  Evaluation of phencycli-
        dine hydrochloride and other drugs for immobilizing
        grizzly and black bears.  Journal of Wildlife Manage-
        ment 31:532-537

1099.    Linhart, S. B., and Kennelly,  J. J. 1966.   Fluores-
        cent bone labeling of coyotes with demethylchlor-
        tetracycline.   Journal of  Wildlife Management 31(2):
        317-321

1100.    Bergman, R. K., et  al. 1972.   A technique for
        multiple bleedings or intravenous inoculations of
        mink at prescribed intervals.   Lab. An. Sci. 22(1):
        93-95

1101.    Freiss, S.  L., et  al. 1968.  Changes  in contractility
        of cat gastrocnemius tissues controlled by aryl ester
        infustion and  stimulus burst frequency.  Tox. and App.
        Phar. 13:99-107

1102.    Smith, E. B.,  and Clark, D. A. 1972.  Absorption of
        hydrazine through canine skin.  Tox. and App. Phar.
        21:186-193

1103.    Earl, F. L., et  al. 1971.  Clinical laboratory values
        of neonatal and weaning miniature pigs.  Lab. An.
        Sci. 21(5):754-759  j

1104.    Villeneuve, D. C., et  al. 1972.  Placental transfer
        of -^C-Parathion administered intravenously to sheep.
        Tox. and App.  Phar. 21;542-548

1105.    Barrier, M. J. 1970.  Pesticide residues in selected
        tissues of the white-tailed deer, Odocoileus
        virginianus, L.,  in Calhoun County, South Carolina.
        Ph.D. Thesis,  Clemson University

-------
 1106.   Allen, T. J.  1970.   Immobilization of white-tailed
        deer with succinychlorine chloride and hyaluronidae.
        J. of Wildlife Management 34(1):207

 1107.   Thomas, J. W. , e_t  al. 1967.  Use of diazepam in the
        capture and handling of Cervids.  Journal of Wildlife
        Management 31 (4)-.686-692 "

 1108.   Behrend, D. F. 1965.  Notes on field immobilization
        of white-tailed  deer with nicotine.  Journal of Wild-
        life Management  31(3):464-468

 1109.   Montgomery, G. G., and Hawkins,  R. E. 1967.  Diazepam
        bait for capture of white-tailed deer.  Journal of
        Wildlife Management  31(3):464-468

 1110.   Thornett, H. D.  et  al. 1973.  Methodology and manage-
        ment of simian toxicology studies with emphasis on
        special techniques.  Laboratory  Animal Science 23(3):
        350-354

 1111.   Block, M. 1960.  Wound healing in the new-born opossum.
        Nature 187:340-341

 1112.   Wolf, H. G. , et  al. 1971.  Hematologic values for
        laboratory reared Marmosa mitis.  Lab. An. Sci.
        21(2):249-251

1113.   Jones, J. B., et al. 1972.  A comparison of
        hemoglobins of several laboratory animals.  Lab.
        An. Sci. 22(4):532-537

1114.   Walburg, H. E.,  et  al. 1965.  Microbiological
        evaluation of an~Tsolation facility for the
        production of specific-pathogen-free mice.  Lab. An.
        Care 15(3):208-216

1115.   Verschuuren, H.  G., et  al. 1970.  Influence of
        triphenyltin acetate on lymphatic tissue and immune
        responses in guinea pigs.  Tox.  and App. Phar. 16:
        400-410

1116.   Allen, R. C. 1946.  Animal Health program, Biology
        Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.  Lab. An.
        Care 14(4) : 260-263

1117.   Ruhren R. 1965.  Normal values for hemoglobin
        concentration and cellular elements in the blood
        of Mongolian gerbils.  Lab. An.  Care 15 (5) : 313-^320

-------
1118.   Calhoon, J. R.,  and Matthews, P. J.  1964.   A method
        for initiating a colony of specific-pathogen-free
        guinea pigs.  Lab. An. Care 14 (5):388-394

1119.   Johnson, W. H.,  et  al. 1966.  Biology.  Holt,
        Rinehart and Winston, New York

1120.   Kaplan, H. M. 1962.  Toxicity of chlorine for frogs.
        Lab. An. Care 12:259-262

1121.   Miles, H. W. , et  al. 1931.  On the ecology and
        control of slugs.  Ann. Appl. Biol.  18:370-400

1122.   Kohn, A. J. 1961.  Chemoreception in gastropod
        molluscs.  Am. Zool. 1:291-308

1123.   Wells, M. J., and Buckley, S. K. L.  1972.   Snails
        and trails.  Anim. Behav. 20:345-355

1124.   Witt, P. N., et  al. 1968.  A Spider's Web, Problems
        in Regulatory Biology.  Springer-Verlag,  New York

1125.   Jacobson, M., and Smalls, L. A. 1966.  Masking of the
        American cockroach sex attractant.  J. Econ. Entomol.
        59(2):414-416

1126.   Roelofs, W. L. and Garde, R. T. 19,71.  Hydrocarbon
        sex pheromone in tiger moths  (Arctiidae). Science
        171(2):684-686

1127.   Roelofs, W. L., and Comeau, A. 1971.  Sex pheromone
        perception:  synergists and inhibitors for the red-
        banded leaf roller attractant.  J. Insect. Physiol.
        17:435-448

1128.   Blum, M. S. 1970.  The Chemical Basis of Insect
        Sociality.  Ed.:  M. Berosa, Acad. Press, N.Y.

1129.   Beroza, M. 1970.  Current usage and some, recent
        developments with insect attractants and repellants
        in the USDA.  Chemicals Controlling Insect Behavior
        pp. 145-163 Acad. Press, New York

1130.   Fukami, H. The feasibility of insect control utili-
        zing a sex pheromone.  Env. Toxicol.:571-586

1131.   Gerger, R. S., and Canerday, T. D. 1968.  Specificity
        of the cabbage looper sex attractant.  J. Econ.
        Entomol.  61(2):452-454

-------
1132.   Tinkle, D. W., and Liner, E. A. 1955.  Behavior of
        Natrix in aggregations.  Field and Lab. 23 (3-4):84-87

1133.   Cooke, A. S.  1971.  Selective predation by newts on
        frog tadpoles treated with DDT.  Nature 229:275

1134.   Dews, P. B. 1957.  Studies of Behavior III.  Effects
        of scopolancine on reversal of a discriminatory
        performance in pigeons.  J. Phar. and Exp. Ther.
        115:343-353

1135.   Heinz, G. 1974.  Patuxant Wildlife Research Center,
        Laurel, Maryland.  Personal Communication.

1136.   West, R. R. et  al. 1969.  Repelling pheasants from
        sprouting corn with a carbamate insecticide.  Journal
        of Wildlife Management 33 (1):216-219

1137.   West, R. R.,  and Dunks, J. H. 1969.  Repelling boat-
        tailed grackles from sprouting corn with a carbamate
        compound.  Texas J. Sci. 21(2):231-233

1138.   Simpson, C. F., et  al. 1970.  B-aminopropionitrile-
        induced dissecting aneurysms of turkeys:  treatment
        with propranolol.  Tox. and App. Phar. 16:143-153

1139.   Tallarico, R. B., and Farrell, W. M. 1964.  Studies
        of visual depth perception:  an effect of early
        experience on chicks on a visual cliff.  J. Comp.
        Physio.  Phychol.  57(l):94-96

1140.   Hamilton, W. J., Jr. 1937.  Activity and home range
        of the field mouse, Microtus pennsylvanicus
        pennsylvanicus.  Ecology 18:255-263

1141.   Eliassen, E., and Leivestad, H. 1961.  Sodium and
        potassium content in the muscles of hibernating
        animals.  Nature 192, Nove. 4, 1961:459-460

1142.   Eisenberg, J. F. 1964.  Studies on the behavior of
        Sorex vagrans. American Midland Naturalist 72:
        417-425

1143.   Beidler, L. M. , Fishman, I. Y., and Hardman, C. W.
        1955.  Species differences in taste responses.  Am.
        J. Physiol. 181:235-239

1144.   Pfaffmann, C. 1953.  Species differences in taste
        sensitivity.  Science 117:470

-------
1145.    Thacker, E.  J.,  and Brandt,  C.  S.  1955.   Coprophagy
        in the rabbit.   J.  Nutr.  55:375-385

1146.    Ericsson, R. J.  et^  al.  1971.   Bait acceptance by
        rats of microencapsulated male  sterilant alpha-
        chlorohydrin.  Journal of Wildlife Management 35(3):
        573-576

1147.    Johnson, F.  M.,  et  al.  1962.   Rodent repellent value
        of arasan-endrin mixtures applied  to acorns.   Journal
        of Wildlife  Management 26:15-16

1148.    Pengelley, E. J., and Fisher,  K.  C. 1957.  Onset and
        cessation of hibernation under  constant temperature
        and light in the golden-mantled ground squirrel.
        Nature 180:1371-1372

1149.    Baldwin,,F.  M.,  and Johnson, K. L. 1941.  Effects of
        hibernation  on the rate of oxygen consumption in the
        thirteen-lined ground squirrel.  J. Mamm. 22:180-182

1150.    Howard, W. E.,  and Cole, R.  E.  1967.  Olfaction in
        seed detection by deer mice.  J.  Mamm. 48(1):147-150

1151.    Howard, W. E.,  et  al. 1968.  Food detection by deer
        mice using olfactory rather than visual cues.  An.
        Behavior 16:13-17

1152.    Eisenberg, J. F. 1963.  The intraspecific social
        behavior of some cricetine rodents of the genus
        Peromyscus.   Am. Midland Nat.  69(1):240-246

1153.    Clemens, L.  G.  1969.  Experimental analysis of sexual
        behavior of the deermouse Peromyscus maniculatus
        gambeli.  Behavior 34:267-285

1154.    Bindra, D.,  and Anchel, H. 1963.   Immobility as in
        avoidance response and its disruption by drugs.  J.
        Exp. 3nal. of Behav. 6(2):213-217

1155.    Sidman, M. 1955.  Technique for assessing the effects
        of drugs on timing behavior.  Science 22:925

1156.    Mulder, J. B. 1971.  Animal behavior and electro-
        magnetic energy waves.  Lab. An. Sci. 21(3):389-393

1157.    Khairy, M. 1959.  Changes in behavior associated
        with a nervous system poison (DDT).  J. Exp. Psychol.
        Quarterly 9:84-91

-------
1158.   Spoor, R. P., and Jackson, D. B. 1966.  Circadian
        rhythms:  variation in sensitivity of isolated rat
        atria to acetylcholine.  Science 154:782

1159.   Nelson, W., et  al. 1971.  Dose-response evaluations
        of a circadian rhythmic change in susceptibility of
        mice to ovabain.  Tox. and App. Phar. 18:335-339

1160.   Halberg, F., Visscher, M. B., and Bittner, J. J.
        1953.  Eosinophil rhythm in mice:  range of oc-
        curance; effects of illumination feeding and adrena-
        lectomy.  Am. J. Physiol. 174:109-122

1161.   Falk, J. L., and Hass, W. 0., III. 1965.  The control
        and recording of response force.  J. Exp. Anal, of
        Behav. 8(3):195

1162.   Vernon, W., and Ulrich, R. 1966.  Classical condition-
        ing of pain-ellicited aggression.  Science 152:668

1163.   Lai, H., and Brown, R. M. 1969.  Effects of bacterial
       • ehdotoxin on operant behavior of the r.at. Tox. and
        App. Phar. 14:41-47

1164.   Belleville, R. E.1964.  Control of behavior by drug-
        produced internal stimuli.  Psychopharm. 5:95-105

1165.   Pradhan, S. N., and Roth, T. 1968.  Comparative be-
        havioral effects of several anticholinergic agents
        in rats.  Psychopharm. 12:358-366

1166.   Walters, G. C., et  al. 1963.  The gerbil as a
        subject in behavioral research.  Psych. Reports
        12:315-318

1167.   Sidman, M. 1953.  Avoidance conditioning with brief
        shock and no exteroceptive warning signal.  Science
        118:157-158

1168.   Goldberg, M. E., Haun, C., and Smyth, H. F. 1962.
        Toxicologic implication of altered behavior induced
        by an industrial vapor.  Tox. and App. Phar. 4:148-
        164.

1169.   Heistad, G. T., and Torres, A.  A. 1959.  A mechanism
        for the effect of a tranquilizing drug on learned
        emotional responses.  University of Minnesota
        Med. Bull. 30:518

-------
1170.    Sidman, M.  1956.   Drug-behavior interaction.   N.Y.
        Acad.  of Sci., Ann.  65:282

1171.    Pradhan, S. N., et  al. 1967.   Some behavioral effects
        of ditran  (JB 329Y in rats.   Arch.  Int.  Pharmacodyn.
        170(2):264-275

1172.    Geller, I., and Seifter, J.  1962.   The effects of
       i1 raono-urethans, di-urethans and barbiturates on a
        punishment discrimination.  J. Exp. Ther. 136:284-288

1173.    Kinnard, W. J., Jr., and Carr, C.  J. 1957.   A pre-
        liminary procedure for the evaluation of central
        nervous system depressants.   J. Phar. and Exp. Ther.
        121:354-361

1174.    Stein, L. 1963.  Anticholinergic drugs and the
        central control of thirst.  Science 139:46-48

1175.    Seiko, L. F. 1938.  Hibernation of the striped skunk
        in Iowa.  J. Mamm. 19:320-324

1176.    Anderson, H. T., Punakoshi,  M., and Zotterman, Y.
        1962.   Electrophysiological investigation of the
        gustatory effect of various biological sugars.  Acta.
        Physiol. 56:362-375

1177.    Robinson, W. H. 1970.  Acute toxicity of sodium mono-
        fluoroacetate to cattle.  Journal of Wildlife Manage-
        ment 34(3):647-648

1178.    Sandier, B. E., et  al. 1968.  Effect of dieldrin on
        detour behavior in" sheep.  Psychological Reports
        23, 451-455

1179.    Sandier, B. E., et  al. 1969.  Dieldrin exposure and
        vigilance behavior in  sheep.   Psychon. Sci. 157:
        1057-1058

1180.    Van Gelder, G. A. 1969.  Behavioral and electro-
        physiological effects  of dieldrin  in sheep.
        Industrial Medicine 38 (3):67-67

1181.    Sussman, D. E. 1967.   The effect of exposure  to
        dieldrin on avoidance  response extinction and
        conditioned heart rate  in sheep.   Ph.D. Thesis,
        Iowa State University.

1182.    Dietz, D.  R., and Tigner, J. R. 1968.  Evaluation of
        two mammal repellents  applied  to browse species  in the
        Black Hills.  J. of Wildlife Mgmt.  32 (1):109-114

-------
1183.   Reynolds, H. H., et  al. 1963.  The effect of UDMH on
        learned behavior In" the Java monkey.  Aero. Med.
        34:920-922

1184.   Carter, V. L.,  et  al. 1970.  The effect of bromotri-
        fluoromethane on operant behavior in monkeys.  Tox.
        and App. Phar.  17:648-655

1185.   Hutchinson, R.  R., et  al. 1966.  An automatic method
        for the study of aggression in squirrel monkeys.
        J. Exp. Anal, of Behav. 9(3):223-237

1186.   James, W. T. 1960.  A study of visual discrimination
        in the opossum.  J. Genetic Pyschol. 97:127-130

1187.   Lyman, C. P. 1948.  The oxygen consumption and
        temperature regulation of hibernating hamsters.  J.
        Exp. Zoo. 109:55-78

1188.   Friedman, H., and Marshall, D. A. 1965.  Position
        reversal training in the Virginia opossum: evidence
        for the acquisition of a learning set.  Quarterly J.
        Exp. Psycho. 17:250-254

1189.   James, W. T. 1955.  The behavior of the opossum in
       <•• the Guthrie-Horton puzzle box.  J. Genetic Psychol.
        87:203-206

1190.   James, W. T. 1958.  Conditioned responses in the
        opossum.  J. Genetic Psychol. 93:179-183

1191.   Kaplan, H., and Hyland, S. O. 1972.  Behavioral
        development in  the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones ungui-
        culatus) .  Ar.im. Behav. 20:147-154

1192.   Smith, P. W. 1961.  The amphibians and reptiles of
        Illinois. Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin,
        Vol. 28, Article 1, State of Illinois, Dept. of
        Registration and Education, Natural History Survey
        Division

1193.   Porter, K. R. 1972.  Herpetology. W. B. Saunders
        Co., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

1194.   Musgrove, J. W., and Musgrove, M. R. 1953. Waterfowl
        in Iowa. State  Conservation Commission, Des Moines,
        Iowa

1195.   Graves, J. B. 1974.  Entomology Dept., Louisiana
        State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Personal
        Communication

-------
1196.   Rand, A.  L. Birds of North America.   Doubleday and
        Company,  Inc.,  New York

1197.   Linder, R. L.,  and Atkins, T. D. 1971.   Effects of
        dieldrin Heterakis gallinarum of pheasants.   Proc.
        S. D. Acad. Sci. 59:214-215

1198.   Linder, R. L.,  et  al. 1970.  Residues  in the brain
        of adult pheasants given dieldrin.  J.  Wildlife
        Mgmt. 34(4):954-956

1199.   New, D. A. T.  1966.  The Culture of Vertebrate
        Embryos.   Logos Press, Academic Press Inc.,  N. Y.

1200.   Hamburger, V.,  and Balaban, M. 1963.  Observations
        and experiments on spontaneous rhythmical behavior
        in the chick embryo.  Devel. Bio. 1:533-545

1201.   Burt, W.  H. 1957.  Mammals of the Great Lakes Region.
        University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

1202.   Padgett,  G. A.  et  al. 1968.  Mink as a biomedical
        model.  Lab. Animal Care 18 (2):258-266

1203.   Hutchenson, D.  1974.  Sinclair Research Farm,
        University of Missouri, Columbia. Personal Communi-
        cation

1204.   Brown, R. V.,  and Hutcheson, D. P. 1973.  Nutrition
        and alcohol consumption in the Sinclair miniature
      " pig*-  Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol,
        Vol. 34(3):758-763

1205.   Lewis, M. 1974.  Personal Communication.  FAA Civil
        Aeromedical Inst., ACC 1186G, P. 0. Box 25082,
        Oklahoma City

1206.   Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1960.  Principles
        and Procedures of Statistics.  McGraw Hill

1207.   Loomis, T. A.  1968.  Essentials of Toxicology.  Lea
        and Febiger

1208.   Goldstein, A.  1964.  Biostatistics;  An Introductory
        Text.  The Macmillian Co.

-------