United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of
Emergency and
Remedial Response
EPA/ROD/R02-88/074
July 1986
Superfund
Record of Decision
Lipari Landfill, NJ
-------
30272-101
REPORT DOCUMENTATION
PAGE
1." REPORT NO.
EPA/ROD/R02-88/074
3. Recipient's Accession No.
4. Till* ind Subtitle
SUPERFUND RECORD OF DECISION
jipari Landfill, NJ
Phi rA Remedial Action - Final
5. Report 0»t«
07/11/88
7. Authors)
8. Performing Organization Rept. No.
9. Performing Organization Name and Addresa
10. Project/Task/Work Unit No.
11. Contract(C) or Grant(G) No.
(C)
(G)
12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20460
13. Type of Report & Period Covered
800/000
14.
IS. Supplementary Notes
16. Abstract (Limit: 200 words)
The Lipari Landfill site is a municipal and industrial waste landfill in Mantua
Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey. The landfill consists of an "onsite" and an
"offsite"-portion. The onsite portion is a formerly active landfilling area that
consists of a slurry wall/synthetic membrane containment system. This portion was
addressed in a previous remedial action. A separate previous remedial action focused on
water- transportable contaminants from within the containment system. This
action addresses the-offsite portion of the site which is the area outside of
the encapsulation system consisting of agricultural and residential areas that include
several lakes, streams, and parks. The site is bordered by the Zee Orchard on the north
and west, and a housing development on the northeast. The site property was purchased
by Mr. Nicholas Lipari in 1958 and was used until 1971 for excavation of sand and gravel
and landfilling of municipal and household wastes, liquid and semi-solid chemical
wastes, and other industrial wastes. Offsite investigations indicate that lakes,
streams, and marshland in the area surrounding the site have been impacted by
contaminant migration from the landfill. The primary contaminants of concern affecting
the ground water, surface water, sediments, soil and air are VOCs including benzene,
toluene, and xylene, and metals including arsenic, chromium, and lead.
(See Attached Sheet)
17. Document Analysis a. Descriptors
Record of Decision
Lipari Landfill, NJ
Third Remedial Action - Final
Contaminated Media: gw, sw, soil, sediments
Key Contaminants: metals (arsenic, chromium, lead), VOCs (benzene, toluene, xylenes)
b. Identifiers/Open-Ended Terms
c. COSATI Held/Group
Availability Statement
19. Security Class (This Report)
None
20. Security Class (This Page)
None
21. No. of Pages
164
22. Price
(See ANSI-Z39.18)
See Instructions on Reverse
OPTIONAL FORM 272 (4-771
(Formerly NTIS-35)
Department of Commerce
-------
PA/ROD/R02-88/074
|pari Landfill, NJ
lird Remedial Action - Final
16. ABSTRACT (continued)
The selected remedial action for the offsite areas includes: collection of the
contaminated ground water/leachate, followed by onsite treatment and discharge to POTW;
excavation of contaminated marsh soil, and dredging and dewatering contaminated
sediments, followed by thermal treatment and offsite disposal as nonhazardous material;
integration of offsite sampling with the onsite monitoring plan being developed to
monitor the effectiveness of the onsite flushing action; and temporary remedial measures
in the surrounding marshland, if necessary, to mitigate volatile emissions from leachate
seepage areas. The estimated present worth cost for this remedial action is
$21,000,000. O&M costs were not provided.
-------
LIPARI LANDFILL SUPERFUND SITE
RECORD OF DECISION FOR THE OFF-SITE AREAS
JULY 11, 1988
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section . Page
.1. DECLARATION STATEMENT
II. DECISION SUMMARY
- Site Description 1
- Lipari Landfill Site History 3
- Contaminant Pathways/Risks 10
- Enforcement Activities 12
- Community: Relations Activities 13
- Scope and Role of Remedial Activities 13
- Description of Remedial Alternatives 14
- ARARs 14
- Disposal Options 23
- Summary of the Comparative Analysis of Alternatives 26
- Selected Remedy 33
- Statutory Findings / Summary 34
III. TABLES
1. History of Investigations for Lipari Landfill Off-site Areas.
2. Chronological Summary of Disposal and Remedial History.
3. Lipari Landfill Chemicals- Elevated Above Background.
4. Representative Lipari Contaminants in Groundwater; Marsh,
and Air-—Post Containment Construction.
5. Risk Assessment.
6. Chemical-Specific ARARs.
7. Remedial Technologies Screening Summary.
8. Metals in Soils and Sediments.
9. Summary of Evaluations and Cost Summary for Each Alternative.
10. Costs Associated with Selected Alternatives.
IV. FIGURES
1. General Area Plan
2. Lipari Landfill Site
3. Area for Volume Estimates in Chestnut Branch Marsh
4. Plan View, Approximate Locations for Alternatives I,.2,and 3
V. ATTACHMENTS
A. Groundwater Characteristics of Lipari Landfill Samples
B..Summary Tables for Off-Site Lipari Sampling Programs
C. Qualitative Summary of Compounds Detected in the On-Site
Lipari Landfill and in Off-Site Areas
D. Geologic Profiles
E. Proposed Remedial Action Plan
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
VI. RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY
Final Responsiveness Summary for the Off-Site Lipari Landfill
-The community relations summary of the presentation of citizens
comments and concerns, and EPA's response to those concerns.
Appendix A
Section 1. Letters Received from the Community
Section 2. Technical Comments
Section 3. Technical Reply - EPA Declaration
Section 4. Technical Reply - EPA/ERT
Section 5. Technical Reply - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Section 6. Technical Reply - Camp Dresser & McKee
VII. EPA/ERT SAMPLING -PROGRAM
-------
DECLARATION STATEMENT
RECORD OF DECISION
Lipari Landfill (Off-Site Areas)
SITE NAME AND LOCATION
Lipari Landfill, Mantua Township, Gloucester County, New Jersey
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
This decision document presents the selected remedial actions
for the off-site areas impacted by contaminant migration from
the Lipari Landfill. These actions have been developed in
accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Comp-
ensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended by the Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986, and to the extent
applicable, the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan, 40 CFR part 300.
STATEMENT OF BASIS
I am basing my decision primarily on the following documents,
which are contained in the administrative record, and that
characterize the nature and extent of contamination and evaluate
the relative merits of remedial alternatives for the Lipari
Landfill off-site areas:
- On-Site Hydrogeological Remedial Investigation of Lipari
Landfill, prepared by Camp Dresser & McKee, July 1985;
- On-Site Feasibility Study for Lipari Landfill, prepared by
Camp Dresser & McKee,' August 1985;
- Off-Site Remedial Investigation (Phase 1) for Lipari Landfill,
prepared by Camp Dresser & McKee, June 1987;
- Off-Site Remedial Investigation (Phase 2) for Lipari Landfill,
prepared by Camp Dresser & McKee, February 1988;
- Public Health Evaluation for Off-Site Remedial Investigation,
Lipari Landfill, prepared by ICF/Clement Associates, June 1987;
- Off-Site Feasibility Study for Lipari Landfill, prepared by
Camp Dresser & McKee, February 1988;
- Air Quality Investigation, Second Season Monitoring Results,
Lipari Landfill, prepared by NUS Corporation, April 1988;
•
- Air Analyses for Lipari Landfill, May 27-June 5, 1986, prepared
by Enviresponse, February 1987;
-------
- Air Analyses for Lipari Landfill, September 11-30, 1986,
prepared by Enviresponse, August 1987;
- TAGA Analyses of Spring Leachate, Air Vent and Surface Water
Samples from Lipari Landfill, prepared by Enviresponse,
August 1987;
- TAGA Analyses of Summer Leachate, Air Vent and Surface Water
Samples from Lipari Landfill, prepared by Enviresponse, ~ -'
August 1987;
- Fall Air and Leachate Analyses for Lipari Landfill, October 17-
November 14, 1987, prepared by Roy F. Weston, January 1988;
- Lipari Landfill Leachate Area Reconnaissance, prepared by
NUS Corporation, March 1986;
- Air Sample Analyses for Lipari Landfill, prepared by Roy F.
Weston, November 1985;
- Evaluation of Analytical Data from Park and Recreation Areas
in Proximity to Lipari Landfill, prepared by NUS corporation,
September 1986;
- Review of Draft Final Off-Site Remedial Investigation Report
for Lipari Landfill and Draft Final Public Health Evaluation
for Off-Site Remedial Investigation, prepared by Environmental
and Energy Consultants, February 1988;
- Health Assessment, Lipari Landfill, prepared by Agency for
Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), October 1985;
- Health Assessment, Lipari Landfill, prepared by ATSDR,
October 1986;
- Park and Recreational Area Health Assessment, prepared by
ATSDR, October 1986;
- Health Consultation on July 1986 Private Well Analytical Data,
Lipari Landfill, prepared by ATSDR, August 1987;
- Arsenic and Lead Health Consultation, Lipari Landfill, prepared
by ATSDR, February 1988;
- Air Monitoring Data Analysis; Health Consultation, Lipari
Landfill, prepared by ATSDR, March 1988;
- ERT Analytical Report for Lipari Landfill Sampling Effort of
March 15 and 16, 1988, prepared by ERT, May 1988;
-------
- Proposed Remedial Action Plan for Off-Site Lipari Landfill
Areas, March 1988;
- The attached Decision Summary for the Lipari Landfill Off-Site
Areas;
- The attached Responsiveness Summary, which addresses- public
comments received; and
- Staff summaries and recommendations;
DESCRIPTION OF SELECTED REMEDY
The remedial actions identified in this document represent a
final solution for the Lipari Landfill site. The actions
address those areas outside of the existing containment system
which have been impacted by contaminant migration from the
landfill. Previous Records of Decision, signed in 1982 and
1985, provided for the installation of a containment system
around Lipari Landfill to mitigate the off-site migration of
landfill contaminants, and the flushing of water-transportable
contaminants from within the containment system.
Contamination attributable to the Lipari Landfill has been
detected in the ground water, surface water, soils, lake and
stream sediments, and the air in the vicinity of the landfill.
The remedial actions to address this off-site contamination
include the following components:
- Collection of ground water/leachate in the Cohansey and
Kirkwood aquifers, followed by on-site treatment and discharge
to a publicly owned treatment works;
- Excavation of contaminated soils in the Chestnut Branch marsh,
followed by thermal treatment to remove organic contaminants
and placement as a non-hazardous material;
- Dredging and dewatering of contaminated sediments in Alcyon
Lake, followed by thermal treatment to remove organic contam-
inants and placement as a non-hazardous material;
- Dredging and dewatering of contaminated sediments in Rabbit
Run and Chestnut Branch stream, followed by thermal treatment
to remove organic contaminants and placement as an non-hazard-
ous material;
- Temporary measures, if necessary, to reduce volatile emissions
from leachate seepage areas in the Chestnut Branch marsh; and
- Integration of sampling in the off-site areas with the on-site
monitoring plan being developed to monitor the effectiveness
of the on-site flushing action.
-------
-4-
DECLARATIONS
Consistent with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Comp-
ensation and Liability Act, as amended, and the National Oil
and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan, 40 CFR Part
300, I have determined that the selected remedy is protective
of human health and the environment, attains federal and state
requirements that are applicable or relevant and appropriate, ~/
and is cost-effective. Futhermore, this remedy satisfies the
preference for treatment that reduces toxicity, mobility or
volume as a principal element. Finally, I have determined that
this remedy utilizes permanent solutions and alternate treatment
technologies to the maximum extent practicable.
The State of New Jersey has been consulted and agrees with the
selected remedy.
ll.tff
m
Date Ch/i stopper J./Daggett
Regional Administrator
I concur with the selected remedy for the Lipari Landfill site,
Dafte Winston J. Porter
Assistant Administrator
-------
DECISION SUMMARY
Lipari Landfill (Off-Site Areas)
SITE DESCRIPTION
The "off-site" Lipari Landfill areas are defined as those geo-
graphical areas outside of the landfill's existing slurry wall/
synthetic membrane encapsulation system. This system, referred
to as the "on-site" portion of the Lipari Landfill, was con-
structed in 1983-84 to segregate those areas of formerly active
landfilling from the surrounding environment. The off-site
areas encompass a mix of agricultural and residential properties
located in Mantua Township and the Borough of Pitman in Gloucester
County, New Jersey (Figure 1). The off-site areas include the
drainage basin east-northeast of the landfill consisting of
Alcyon Lake, the Chestnut Branch marsh and Chestnut Branch
stream, Rabbit Run, Girl Scout Branch, Lost Lake Run and three
public parks — Alcyon Park, Betty Park and Hollywood Dell Park.
The landfill borders the off-site area and is approximately 1500
feet north of U.S. Route 322 and 1.5 miles west of Glassboro
State College. Northeast of the site and immediately east of
Chestnut Branch stream is a housing development of single family
homes. The Zee Orchard comprises most of the area north and
west of the landfill.
It should be noted that both the. "on-site" portion of the Lipari
Landfill and the "off-site" areas impacted by contamination froir,
the landfill are considered part of the site as defined by the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act of'1980 (CERCLA), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA).
Surface Waters
Several drainage systems occur in the area as shown in Figure l,
General Area Plan. The main drainage system is Chestnut Branch,
with headwaters south of the landfill area. After flowing past
the northeastern border of the site, Chestnut Branch discharges
into Alcyon Lake approximately 1,500 feet north of the landfill.
Rabbit Run, a small tributary of Chestnut Branch, derives its
headwater flow from a small spring located adjacent to the
landfill. This stream flows for approximately 1200 feet along
the full length of the northwestern edge of the landfill before
it discharges into Chestnut Branch just north of the site. Two
other small streams of interest in the study area are Lost Lake
Run and Girl Scout Branch. Lost Lake Run originates northeast
of the Ligari Landfill within the residential area and discharges
into Chestnut Branch directly east of the landfill. Girl Scout
Branch originates northwest of the landfill and discharges into
Alcyon Lake north of the Lipari site. These streams are import-
ant because they serve as a basis of comparison involving areas
not impacted by the landfill.
-------
-2-
i
Alycon Lake is a man-made lake fed by Chestnut Branch and Girl
Scout Branch. It is estimated that the lake has a surface area
of 18.5 acres, a maximum depth of 6.4 feet, an average depth of
3.4 feet, a volume of 2,740,000 cubic feet, and about 4,800 feet
of shoreline.
It has been reported that the lake's natural recharge,.(in
addition to Chestnut Branch and Girl Scout Branch), originates
from artesian springs in the lake bottom. The springs have been
gradually impeded because of deposition of silt and organic
overburden resulting in the reduction of the lake's depth. The
geological origin of these springs is the Kirkwood aquifer.
Alcyon Lake has been closely associated with the history of the
Borough of Pitman since its development in the 1890s. The lake
was a public resource used for recreational activities until
1958 when recreational usage was first restricted because of
bacterial contamination.
Chestnut Branch Marsh
The marsh area located adjacent to the Lipari Landfill has been
impacted by contaminant migration from the landfill. It is
bordered on the north by Rabbit Run, and to the east by Chestnut
Branch stream. The marsh itself is a typical riparian environ-
ment characterized by a seasonally high water table close to the
soil surface, standing water, and dense vegetation. Occasional
.flooding by Chestnut Branch stream, as well as yearly decay of
vegetation have resulted in a layer of organic material on top
of the .native sandy soils. Several areas adjacent to leachate
seeps in the marsh are characterized by large dead trees and
sparse vegetation, leading to the conclusion that vegetation in
these areas has been stressed because of contaminants in the
soil and ground water. It has been estimated that at least
30,000 cubic yards of marsh soils have been impacted by contami-
nant migration. A description of the affected areas is contained
on page 8 under the section titled "Phase III Off-Site Remedial
Investigation". Access to the marsh has been restricted by
fences installed in August 1983.
Public Parks
Three public parks border Chestnut Branch and Alcyon Lake —
Betty Park, Alcyon Park, and Hollywood Dell Park. Betty Park
on the east bank and Alcyon Park on the west bank border on
about 2,400 feet of Alcyon Lake shoreline. Hollywood Dell Park
is at the northern most end of the lake, and is directly
separated»from the lake shoreline by a spillway (flood control
dam) and West Holly Avenue. Alcyon Park contains picnic areas
and a small recreation area for children. Hollywood Dell Park
contains picnic areas, a soccer field, a baseball diamond, and
a small recreation area for children. Historically, these
parks have been extensively used.
-------
-3-
Resldential Community
The residential community of Pitman — particularly the homes
along Howard Avenue, Lake Avenue,. Lakeside Avenue, and Lakeview
Avenue — lies within a few hundred feet east of the Lipari
Landfill and Alcyon Lake. Complaints from local residents
concerning irritating odors and nausea led to the closing of
the landfill in 1971. Since the construction of the containment
system in 1983-84, odors have been greatly reduced but not
eliminated. Public access to Chestnut Branch, the marsh area,
and Alcyon Lake is restricted by fencing and/or warning signs.
LIPARI LANDFILL SITE HISTORY
The property was purchased by Nicholas Lipari in 1958 for use
as a sand and gravel pit. This type of land use also made the
property profitable for landfilling subsequent to excavation of
the sand and gravel. As sand and gravel were removed, Mr. Lipari
accepted solid and liquid wastes for disposal. Approximately
six acres of the site were used for these operations. It is
documented that these excavations were in the western portion
of the 15-acre parcel as shown in Figure 2, Lipari Landfill
Site. The disposal history to be discussed below is summarized
in Table 2, Chronological Summary of Disposal and Remediation
History.
The two business operations (excavation and landfilling) were
integrated by backfilling the excavated portions of the land
with municipal and household wastes, liquid and semi-solid
chemical wastes, and other industrial wastes. Between 1958 and
1971, liquid as well as semi-solid chemical wastes, and other
industrial waste materials were accepted and dumped at the
landfill. Solid wastes were disposed of until May 1971 when
the site was closed by the New Jersey Solid Waste Administration
(NJSWA). On Mr. Lipari's own initiative, liquid wastes were
no longer landfilled after 1969 because of the concern about
continued fire and explosion hazards. At least one explosion
and two fires had occurred up to that time.
•
The exact nature and quantity of wastes received at the landfill.
are not known since detailed records were not maintained. The
estimates based on parties known to have used the landfill in-
dicate that 12,000 cubic yards of industrial solid wastes and
more than 3 million gallons of liquid wastes were buried. It
is reported that liquids were emptied from salvageable containers
and that only unsalvageable drums were buried without first
draining .their contents. The wastes that were reported to have
been dumped at the landfill included cleaning solvents, phenol
or amine wastes and residues, and resins and ester press cakes.
Generally, household refuse was disposed into trenches, 'followed
by disposal of the liquid chemical waste. Other chemical wastes
in 55-gallon drums were buried in trenches in the landfill.
-------
-4-
In 1970, the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) observed
leachate seeping out of the landfill along the escarpment east
of the site and discharging into Chestnut Branch and the adjoin-
ing marsh area. Leachate seeps were visible along the east and
northeast slopes. They were brown and viscous* in appearance
and had a pungent irritating odor that was noticeable to area
residents, particularly those residing along Howard Avenue. The
landfill was closed in May 1971 by the NJSWA with the impetus
of an affidavit, signed by local residents, that complained of
intolerable odors, headaches, nausea, and the residents' inabil-
ity to breathe.
In July 1971, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Pro-
tection (NJDEP) notified Mr. Lipari to correct the situation.
Based on Mr. Lipari'sConsultation with engineers, he construct-
ed surface water runoff diversions, regraded areas, and spread
fresh dirt and lime to mitigate the problem; however, the
effort was not effective. The NJDEP filed suit in 1972 against
Nicholas Lipari for violation of the New Jersey Water Quality
Act (NJSA 58:1023.1 et seq).
Numerous investigators subsequently collected samples of the
contaminated ground water beneath the Lipari Landfill site.
Attachment A, Leachate Characteristics of Lipari Landfill
Samples, shows the contaminants and maximum concentrations
measured in samples of ground water collected from within the
landfill's encapsulation system up to 1985. The data provided
in the attachment were used in the development of the On-site
Feasibility Study (CDM, 1985). To date, a total of 74 organic
contaminants and 13 inorganic contaminants have been found in
the ground '-'ater and soils of the landfill.
History of Off-Site Areas
The off-site areas have been the subject of investigations by
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and others. These
studies have documented sources of environmental degration.
A discussion of such sources in addition to the Lipari Landfill
is presented below. This section is then followed by a detailed
discussion (Phas'e III Off-site Remedial Investigation) of the
impacts of the Lipari Landfill on ground water, surface water,
soils, sediment and air in the vicinity of the site.
In the mid-1950s, prior to operation of the Lipari Landfill,
Alcyon Lake began to show physical signs of an existing public
health problem and a deteriorating biotic environment. The
Gloucester county Planning Department (GCPD, 1980) cited four
primary reasons for the deterioration of Alcyon LaJce during its
early history.
-------
-5-
1 An increasing number of septic tank systems were installed
within the lake's drainage area.
4 increased urban development and associated increases in storm
water urban runoff discharges into Alcyon Lake and tributary
streams by way of direct drainage inlets.
4 Marginally effective sewerage collection and treatment
facilities in the Boroughs of Pitman and Glassboro increasingly
contributed fecal matter and bacteria into Alcyon Lake.
4 Sedimentation resulting from urban and agricultural develop-
ment activities sealed the natural springs in the bottom of the
lake decreasing the turnover rate of fresh water.
Storm sewer outfalls that discharge directly into Alcyon Lake
and its tributaries have contributed to the observed deteriora-
tion of the lake. The incorporation of the Borough of Pitman's
sewage flow into the Gloucester County Utilities Authority
(GCUA) wastewater treatment plant in the 1970s and subsequent
construction of the Gloucester County sanitary sewer trunkline
east of Chestnut Branch has helped to alleviate pollution from
septic tanks. However, the extent of the present problem
attributable to .the abandoned septic tanks is unknown. The
remedial investigation findings supported previous findings
indicating that water quality in Alcyon Lake has deteriorated,
in part, due to bacterial input. Current bacterial concentre- .
tions in the lake exceed water quality standards.
The existing bacterial contamination led Gloucester County to
close Alcyon Lake to swimming in 1958.
The first documented point source of pollution to Alcyon Lake
was due to the Borough of Glassboro sewerage treatment plant. A
series of malfunctions between 1958 and 1972 caused the discharge
of raw effluent that flowed down Chestnut Branch and into Alcyon
Lake. The Gloucester County Sewerage Authority (now known as
the Gloucester County Utilities Authority) incorporated the
Glassboro system in 1972 and effectively eliminated these dis-
charges (GCPD, 1980). The Borough of Pitman sewerage system
lift station also experienced mechanical malfunctions and
storm-related overloadings, causing the facility to activate
the overflow mechanism and discharge raw effluent directly into
Alcyon Lake. These problems were corrected by the Borough of
Pitman in 1977, although 50-year storm events have occasionally
resulted in incidental overflow from the lift station (GCPD,
1980). Further land development in the area brought additional
sources of degradation.
-------
-6-
In 1980, Gloucester County identified three major sources of
pollutants contributing to the water quality deterioration of
Alcyon Lake: urban storm water runoff, agricultural runoff, and
the Lipari Landfill. The County recognized that increased
development increased the pollutant burden of storm water run-
off. Storm water runoff is a significant source of pollutants,
including oil and grease, hydrocarbons, trace heavy metals, and
micro-organisms. Storm water runoff from several hundred acres
of the Boroughs of Pitman and Glassboro, including Collegetown
Shopping Plaza and Glassboro State College, continues to discharge
directly into Alcyon Lake and its tributaries through several
drainage pipes.
The 1980 Gloucester County report also suggests that adverse
water quality impacts on Alcyon Lake were further caused by the
continued discharge of agricultural runoff from approximately
1,000 acres of active agricultural land treated with pesticides
herbicides, and fungicides. However, specific studies to ident-
ify the mass loading of specific contaminants have not been
undertaken. Consequently, the overall contribution and signif-
icance of these contaminants cannot be quantified.
History of Investigations
Various State, local, and municipal investigations and studies
have taken place over the years, some of which have proved
valuable in providing background information. The investiga-
tions performed prior to the studies to determine the extent
and nature of the contamination in the Lipari Landfill off-site
areas are summarized in Table 1, History of Investigations. A
detailed discussion on these investigations is given in the
Off-Site Lipari Landfill Remedial Investigation (Phase 1)
Report (CDM, 1987).
History of Remedial Actions
Remedial actions have taken place both on-site at the Lipari
Landfill, as well as off-site in the immediate vicinity of the
landfill. On-sj,te actions involved the construction of the
containment system as previously described. Off-site actions
have included temporary measures, such as fence installation
and posted signs to restrict public access to the marsh and
Alcyon Lake. A summary of the remedial history is given in
Table 2, Chronological Summary of Disposal and Remediation
History. A discussion of the history is presented below.
Public Access Restricted
•
Previous- and ongoing investigations confirmed that there was a
potential risk to the public health and environment associated
with the Lipari Landfill. Action was taken under the authority
of Section 104(c) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
-------
-7-
Compensation and Liability Act. In July 1982, an 8-foot high,
chain-link-plus-barbed-wire fence was constructed around the
main landfill site to restrict public access. In August 1983,
a second chain link fence was installed along Chestnut Branch
between the houses on Howard Avenue and the area east of Chestnut
Branch to restrict public access to the marsh area.
Phase I Remedial Investigations
R.E. Wright (1981) evaluated several remedial alternatives in-
tended as interim action until a comprehensive long-term solution
could be developed. Radian corporation (1982), at the request
of EPA Region II, reviewed the environmental impacts associated
with nine proposed Phase I remedial action alternatives for the
on-site portion of the Lipari Landfill study area. The preferred
alternative consisted of a fully encompassing 360-degree slurry
wall with an impervious cap over a 16-acre area, with final
treatment of the contaminated ground water within the encapsula-
tion system at a pubicly owned treatment plant. EPA approved
this preferred alternative for the on-site Lipari Landfill in a
Record of Decision (ROD), signed on August 3, 1982, and commenced
construction in the Fall of 1983. This remedial measure, present-
ly referred to as Phase I, was designed to diminish the flow of
leachate and contaminated ground water from the landfill. An
estimated reduction of 95 percent in the rate of ground water
flow has been achieved as a result of the installation of the
containment system.
Phase .II On-Site Remediation
The Final Draft Remedial Investigation Jnd Feasibility (RI/FS)
for the On-site Lipari Landfill became the basis for the select-
ion of a permanent remedial alternative as discussed in the EPA
ROD, dated September 30, 1985. The remedial alternative which
was selected is commonly referred to as the "batch-flushing"
alternative. The effectiveness of the on-site remedial action
to be implemented directly affects the long-term success of
any remedial action taJcen in the off-site areas. The on-site
action involves,the installation of extraction and injection
wells within the encapsulation system to dewater and flush
water-borne contaminants for treatment at an on-site facility.
A formal agreement to discharge to the GCUA treatment facility
for final treatment is under negotiation. A remedial design
study is currently being performed to determine the design
parameters, particularly those that will allow the batch-flushing
effort to be completed within the desired time frame and to
meet GCUA pretreatment standards. While there is the potential
for contaminants to seep through the slurry wall during flushing,
the September 30, 1985 ROD specified that this problem would be
mitigated by the off-site remedial action (such as an off-site
collection system) developed under the off-site RI/FS and that
-------
-8-
implementation of the batch-flushing alternative would not
begin until such an off-site collection system was in place.
The remedial actions being selected at this time include an
off-site collection system as identified in the 1985 ROD.
Phase III Off-Site Remedial Investigation
In accordance with the National Oil and Hazardous Substances
Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP), EPA conducted a remedial
investigation and feasibility study for the "off-site" areas
affected by contaminant migration from the Lipari Landfill
site. Field work for the RI began in February 1985 and was
completed in February 1987. Contaminants, found in the ground
water, surface water, soils, lake and stream sediments, and in
the air in the off-site Lipari areas are listed in Attachment
B, which includes data from the sampling performed by EPA's
Field Investigation Team (FIT) and Environmental Response Team
(ERT).
The off-site RI report documents the presence of organic and
inorganic contaminants attributable to the Lipari Landfill in
the following off-site areas:
4 Ground water in the Cohansey and Kirkwood aquifers;
* Soils in the Chestnut Branch marsh;
4 Leachate seeps in the Chestnut Branch marsh;
4 Air in the vicinity the Chestnut Branch marsh -.bove the
leachate seeps and in nearby residential areas;
4 Surface water and sediments of Chestnut Branch stream;
4 Surface water and sediments of Rabbit Run; and
4 Surface water and sediments of Alcyon Lake.
Contamination attributable to the Lipari Landfill in the off-
site areas is due to migration through all media: soil, water
and air. A total of 63 of the 74 organic contaminants, and all
13 of the inorganic contaminants detected on-site have been
detected in the off-site areas. Due to the large number of
Lipari-associated contaminants in the off-site areas, 13
indicator chemicals were selected for detailed review during
the remedial investigation to evaluate contaminant migration
from the Lipari Landfill. Table 3 compares concentrations of
the indicator chemicals found in the off-site soils, sediments
and surface waters in areas impacted by contaminant migration
from the site, to background areas not impacted by the site.
This table demonstrates that elevated levels of indicator
chemicals exist in the soils of Chestnut Branch marsh, the
-------
-9-
sediments and surface waters of Rabbit Run, Chestnut Branch
stream, and Alcyon Lake. In addition, Lipari-related contami-
nants including bis(2-chloroethyl)ether, 1,2-dichloroethane,
and benzene have been detected during residential air monitoring
performed with EPA's Trace Atmospheric Gas Analyzer (TAGA) unit.
A listing of representative Lipari-related contaminants found
in the Cohansey and Kirkwood aquifers, the leachate seeps in
Chestnut Branch marsh, and in the ambient air above the marsh
and in residential areas since the construction of the on-site
containment system, is shown in Table 4. Attachments A and B
contain more complete listings of on-site and off-site sampling
results. Attachment C presents a qualitative analysis of the
presence of Lipari-related contaminants in all of the on-site :
and off-site media.
More recent sampling utilizing lower detection limits than were
available during the RI has shown the presence of bis(2-chloro-
ethyl) ether in the sediments of Chestnut Branch stream (41 to
47 milligrams per killigram (ug/kg)), and in the sediments of
Alcyon Lake (42 to 400 ug/kg). This sampling was undertaken
by EPA's Environmental Response Team (EPA/ERT), to address
concerns raised by the U.S. Department of the Interior's
Fish and Wildlife Service involving the presence of Lipari
related contaminants in aquatic habitats for which it is the
natural resource trustee. The concerns were related to high
detection limits associated with sediment sampling during the
off-site RI field activities, especially with regard to BCEE
and mercury. It is notable that, during the off-site RI sampling
when lower detection limits were achieved (Rabbit Run SE-08),
BCEE was detected in the sediments. The detection of the
presence of BCEE.in the sediments of Alcyon Lake and Chestnut
Branch.by EPA/ERT has provided natural resource trustees with
additional information to assess the impacts to habitats under
their responsibility. It has also further demonstrated the
presence of Lipari contaminants in the off-site environment.
A 21-day comment period was announced to receive comments from
interested parties on- the EPA/ERT sampling effort. No comments
were received during that period, however, comments regarding
the sampling procedures and the reasons for the sampling event
were received the following week. A reply was provided to
these comments.
The Cohansey aquifer to the east and northeast of the landfill
in the Chestnut Branch marsh is directly in the path of local
and regional ground water flow, it is likely that the presence
of contaminants in this aquifer is largely attributable to seep-
age prior »to construction of the containment system. A portion
of this formation in the marsh was not encapsulated because of
the limits of slurry wall construction relative to local-.geology,
geography and water conditions. As a result, a reservoir of
contaminants persists in the ground water and soils of Chestnut
Branch marsh. The leachate seep areas show seasonal variation
corresponding to fluctuations in the water table of the Cohansey
-------
-10-
aquifer. This seasonal activity leads to intermittent periods
of leachate flow into Chestnut Branch stream. The variability
in leachate flow, coupled with variations in meteorological
conditions (temperature, wind, rain fall, solar radiation,
atmospheric inversions), affect the rate of hazardous organic
air-borne emissions from the Chestnut Branch marsh. The area
refered to as "Zone 3" (Figure 3) is characterized as the area
of highest air-borne emissions. Zone 3 also encompasses the
portions of the marsh containing the majority of the leachate
seeps. A complete listing of compounds detected in the soils
of Chestnut Branch marsh, the leachate seeps, and in the air
above the seeps, is shown in Attachment B.
The Kirkwood aquifer underlies the Kirkwood clay, a confining
unit that separates it from the surficial Cohansey aquifer. The
Kirkwood is characterized as a low-yield formation containing
fine to very fine dark grey silty micaceous sand. The contamin-
ation that is present in the Kirkwood may be due to improperly
sealed wells placed in the landfill during the late 1970s that
acted as a conduit for contaminant migration, or from vertical
migration from contaminants present in the overlying Cohansey
formation through the Kirkwood clay. The Kirkwood clay is a
continuous formation under the site which ranges in thickness
from 9 to 16 feet. In the area of the Chestnut Branch marsh
adjacent to the site, the Chestnut Branch stream has eroded the
Cohansey sands and the upper portions of the Kirkwood clay.
Alluvial material deposited by the stream is hydraulically.
connected with the Cohansey sands, and the Kirkwood sands. The
Kirkwood clay thins out because of erosion along the south-to-
north meander of the stream. Near the confluence of Rabbit Run
and Chestnut Branch, the Kirkwood clay appears to be completely
eroded. Geologic profiles of the local area are contained in
Attachment D.
CONTAMINANTS PATHWAYS/RISKS
Due to local environmental conditions, including geography,
geology, hydrology and meteorology, and the results of off-site
studies, EPA has concluded that several contaminant migration
pathways exist from the Lipari Landfill to various off-site
areas.
The detection of indicator chemicals in the surface waters -and
sediments of Rabbit Run, Chestnut Branch stream, and Alcyon Lake
indicates that overland transport of indicator chemicals from
the marsh has occurred. Erosion and/or leaching of marsh soils,
followed by surface water transport is a likely migration path-
way. Direct flow of contaminated seepage from the bank adjacent
to the landfill, followed by flow across the ground surface to
Chestnut Branch stream has been observed. Rainstorms and
flooding could accelerate both processes. Contaminants can
also leach vertically and reach the ground water. Analysis of
organic chemical volatilization from marsh soils, leachate seeps,
and ambient air demonstrates that air transport of organic con-
taminants is another contaminant migration pathway.
-------
-11-
The presence of indicator chemicals in the downgradient ground
water of the Cohansey and Kirkwood aquifers indicates horizontal
migration of contaminants in the ground water. The presence of
a hydraulic gradient towards Chestnut Branch stream on either
side of the stream indicates that the potential for contaminant
migration beyond the stream is unlikely. The Cohansey and
Kirkwood aquifers both discharge into Chestnut Branch stream
and can transport contaminants into the stream.
RISKS
As described in the off-site RI report, 13 indicator chemicals
were selected in accordance with the Superfund Public Health
Evaluation Manual on the basis of toxicity, persistence, mobility
and concentration. The list of indicator chemicals includes:
benzene, bis(2-chloroethyl)ether, 1,2-dichloroethane, ethyl-
benzene, 4-methyl-2-pentanone, toluene, xylenes (total), arsenic,
chromium, lead, mercury, nickel, and zinc.
For risk assessment purposes, individual contaminants were
separated into two categories of chemical toxicity depending on
whether they cause carcinogenic or non-carcinogenic effects.
In the case of chemicals exhibiting carcinogenic effects
exposures and associated risks are expressed in an exponential
nomenclature; 1x10-4 (one in ten thousand), 10x10-7 (one in ten
million) etc. EPA has used the range of 1x10-4 to 1x10-7 in
evaluating risk assessment decisions. The level of 1x10-6,
one in a million, has often been used by regulatory agencies as
a benchmark.
The Public Health Evaluation (PHE) characterized the risk
associated with exposure to off-site Lipari Landfill indicator
chemicals. . A summary of the exposure pathways and associated
risks is shown in^Table 5. A lifetime excess cancer risk
greater than 1x10-6 (one in a million) was characterized for
the following exposure pathways:
4 Direct contact with soils in the leachate seep areas;
4 Consumption oi fish from Alcyon Lake; and
4 Inhalation of ambient air in the Howard Avenue residential
area.
The PHE concluded that long-term exposure to volatile organic
emissions originating in the Chestnut Branch marsh would result
in a potential human health threat. Increased lifetime cancer
incidences associated with exposure to BCEE, benzene, and 1,2-
dichloroethane were quantified and are presented in Table 5.
Although these compounds were detected during residential air
monitoring with the TAGA unit, the Agency for Toxic Substances
and Disease Registry (ATSDR) evaluation of the TAGA data concluded
that the levels detected do not pose a current health threat.
-------
-12-
As described in the RI report, contaminant migration persists
in the leachate seeps that in turn migrate into the Chestnut
Branch marsh, as well as into the air above the marsh and nearby
residential areas, to Chestnut Branch stream, and to downstream
receiving waters including Alcyon Lake. Studies have shown that
that bis(2-chloroethyl)ether and mercury are present in the tissue
of fish from the lake. The landfill and the marsh areas are fenced
to restrict access. Alcyon Lake is closed to fishing, 'swimming,
boating and other recreational activties. The lake and streams
are not used as sources of potable water.
The Pitman municipal wells, as well as 11 non-potable resident-
ial wells, have been sampled for priority pollutants, and most
recently for Target Compound List (TCL) contaminants. The water
samples have demonstrated that contaminants from the Lipari Land-
fill have not migrated into any local wells. These findings are
consistent with local geological and hydrogeological conditions
which indicate that contamination is limited to the Cohansey
and upper portions of the Kirkwood aquifer. Futhermore, the
Kirkwood aquifer flows upwards into the Chestnut Branch stream
in the vicinity of the Lipari Landfill, while the Cohansey drains
directly into the stream. Therefore, ground water contaminant
migration is intercepted at the stream. This factor, coupled
with the depth and location of the residential wells (Mount
Laurel, approximately 150 feet deep) and the Pitman municipal
wells (Fotomac-Raritan-Magothy, approximately 550 feet deep) and
the presence of several confining layers makes the possibility
of the introduction of Lipari contaminants to either well
system extremely remote.
ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES
On September 10, 1985, the United States filed a complaint in
the District Court for the District of New Jersey against the
Rohm and Haas Company, Inc., Marvin Jonas, Inc., CBS Records,
Inc., Owens-Illinois, Inc., CENCO, Inc., Almo, Inc., and Manor
Health Care Corporation pursuant to Section 107(a) of CERCLA,
42 U.S.C. J9607 (a), seeking recovery of costs incurred and to
be incurred in Remediating the Lipari Landfill, as well as
declaratory relief pursuant to 2 U.S.C. J2201.
On January 29, 1986, the State of New Jersey filed a Complaint
in Intervention in the suit seeking to recover State costs
incurred and to be incurred in remediating the site.
In October 1986, negotiations for a partial settlement commenced
with thirteen additional parties considered to be de minimis
generators of waste disposed at the Lipari Landfill. Ten of the
original' thirt.een de minimis parties remain at the conclusion of
the negotiation process.
-------
-13-
COMMUNITY RELATIONS ACTIVITIES
Numerous community relations activities have been on-going
during the course of the off-site RI/FS for the Lipari site.
A detailed 10-page Proposed Remedial Action Plan (PRAP) (Attachment
E) was developed and distributed to over 300 interested citizens
and potentially responsible parties. The PRAP was distributed
on March 1, 1988 along with a notice for a Public Meeting to be
held on March 29, 1988. The public comment period extended an
additional 17 days beyond the public meeting to April 15, 1988.
At the request of the Mayor of the Borough of Pitman, EPA held
a public information meeting at Pitman Borough Hall on March 15,
1988. As discussed on page 9, a 21-day comment period was held
to receive comments on the 1988 EPA/ERT off-site sampling program.
While no comments were received during that period, later comments
were received and a reply was sent.
The community has been actively involved in the issues related
to the Lipari Landfill site for several years. The borough was
the recipient of a Technical Assistance Grant (TAG) in January
1987 and hired a technical consultant in the Summer of 1987.
The TAG program has facilitated communications between EPA and
the community. Concerned citizens, local citizens, environmental
groups and elected officials have all expressed the sentiment
that they have felt involved in the decision making process for
off-site remediation.
SCOPE AND ROLE OF REMEDIAL ACTIONS
The overall remediation of threats to public health and the
environment posed by the Lipari Landfill has been undertaken by
EPA in a three-phased approach. As discussed previously, the
August 3, 1982 ROD (Phase I) selected a 360 degree slurry wall
and impermeable cap to restrict contaminant migration from the
site. This action provided substantial relief from noxious
volatile emissions and.the migration of contaminants into the
marsh area, nearby streams and Alcyon Lake. The September 30,
1985 ROD (Phase.II) addressed the permanent removal of contami-
nants from within the containment system through batch-flushing
and on-site treatment of the flushwater. In addition, that ROD
called for the collection of leachate outside of the containment
system.
This ROD addresses Phase III, or those areas outside of the
containment system where Lipari-related contaminants persist in
the environment. The principal threats associated with these
contaminants in the off-site areas include potential human
health threats from long-term exposure to contaminants, and
contaminants that are present in quantities that exceed environ-
mental standards and guidelines. These are illustrated in
Table 5, Risk Assessment and in Table 6, Chemical Specific ARARs.
-------
-14-
Remedial actions to remove persistent contaminants from Chestnut
Branch marsh, Rabbit Run, Chestnut Branch stream, and Alcyon
Lake will eliminate these threats. The installation of a collect-
ion system in the marsh outside of the slurry wall will ensure
that no existing contaminants or potential future contaminant
migration during on-site flushing impacts the off-site areas.
Similarly, the active pumping and treatment of contaminants from
the KirJcwood aquifer wiil remove existing contaminants, and any
potential future contaminants. This action will restore the
aquifer to ensure that environmental standards are met at
discharge points of the Kirkwood ground water in Chestnut Branch
stream and Alcyon Lake. Actions aimed at the collection of
contaminated ground water/leachate will meet the intent of the
Phase II ROD to coordinate off-site remedial actions with
on-site remedial actions, "especially with regard to leachate
treatment".
In summary, the remedial actions set forth in this Record of
Decision represent the third phase of a coordinated effort to
remove contaminants from the environment that are associated
with the Lipari Landfill.
DESCRIPTION OF REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVES
This section describes the remedial alternatives that were
developed, using suitable technologies, to meet the objectives
of the NCP. These alternatives were developed by screening a
wide range of technologies for their applicability to site-
specific conditions including applicable or relevant and appro-
priate requirements (ARARs) and evaluating them for effective-
ness, iinplementability, and cost.
ARARs
Section 121(d) of CERCLA, as amended by SARA, requires that
remedial actions comply with all applicable or relevant and
appropriate Federal and State requirements for the hazardous
substances, pollutants, or contaminants that are present and
attributable to a site. In general, ARARs are promulgated to
address chemical contaminants, specific locations (such as a
marsh), or actions (such as thermal desorption). Chemical-
specific ARARs can be applied to the RI results before any
remedial alternatives are developed, while location- and action-
specific ARARs relate to remedial alternatives and their imple-
mentation. As discussed in the Off-Site RI and FS, numerous
chemical, .location, and action-specific ARARs were evaluated
for the off-site areas. The contaminated soils and sediments
in the off-site areas.are impacting the quality of water in
contact with the soils of Chestnut Branch marsh, and the-.sediments
of Rabbit Run, Chestnut Branch stream and Alcyon Lake. As
such, cleanup of these areas is necessary to achieve water
quality ARARs. :
-------
-15-
The same rationale applies to the marsh ground water collection
system. However, ho federal or state ARARs have yet been
established for soils and sediments. As such, the guidelines
applied to the soil and sediments include the following:
4 Cleanup objectives developed by the NJDEP for soils under the
Environmental Cleanup and Responsibility Act (ECRA);
4 Health or risk based criteria; and
4 Comparison to background levels.
The marsh soils, the leachate seep areas, and the sediments of
Alcyon Lake, Rabbit Run and Chestnut Branch all contain contami-
nants that are also present in the surface waters at levels in
violation of federal and state water quality standards and/or
guidelines. The removal and treatment of the soils and sediments,
coupled with the hydraulic isolation of the landfill via an
off-site collection system will eliminate the soil/sediment/surface
water interface as a contaminant pathway. The capture of seepage
in the marsh, coupled with the interception of contaminated
ground water in the Kirkwood aquifer will ensure that contaminants
present in these areas will not migrate to the surface waters
of Chestnut Branch and'to downstream receiving waters.
In the vicinity of the Lipari Landfill, the Kirkwood aquifer
has been characterized as discharging into Chestnut Branch
stream from both sides of the stream. It is not utilized as a
drinking water source in the-local area, therefore, at a minimum,
remediation of the aquifer will be to protect surface water quality,
As such, surface water ARARs (Federal Water Quality Criteria .
uno^r the Clean Water Act, Fresh Water 2-Non Trout under N.J.
.Surface Water Standards) are appropriate cleanup standards for
the Kirkwood. Table 6 lists chemical specific ARARs under
these statutes for contaminants detected in the Kirkwood aquifer.
A more thorough discussion is contained in the section titled
"Summary of the Comparative Analysis of Alternatives".
In addition to the chemical-specific ARARs, location-specific
and action-specific ARARs exist for activities associated with
the off-site remedial alternatives.
Location-specific ARARs are restrictions placed on the concen-
tration, of hazardous substances solely because they are in
particular locations. Location-specific ARARs that apply to
the off-site Lipari areas include; Executive Order 11990 on
Protection of Wetlands and Executive Order 11988 on Floodplain
Management- EPA has sought input from other agencies (e.g.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Army Corps) in developing remedial
alternatives and restoration activities for the off-site areas.
Input from these and other agencies will be included during
remedial design to address the specific details of the integration
of the requirements of these Executive Orders with respect to
off-site wetlands and waterways.
-------
-16-
The Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act of 1958 requires that an
evaluation and wetlands assessment be undertaken for the off-site
' wetlands that will be impacted during remedial actions. Off-site
studies have characterized the off-site wetlands areas, any futher
evaluations and assessments that will assist in the cleanup and
restoration efforts will be incorporated into the remedial design.
The site of the placement of treated material, the Alcyon
Racetrack, is located in the Borough of Pitman. The downtown
area of Pitman has been designated as an historic district. In
addition, both the Chestnut Branch stream corrider and the
abandoned racetrack may be considered sensitive for the presence
of cultural resources under the National Historic Preservation
Act. Studies to date have not indicated that any of the off-site
areas are considered to be culturally sensitive areas, however,
a Stage IA Survey will be performed on these areas during the :
design phase to futher evaluate cultural sensitivity.
Action-specific ARARs are usually technology- or activity-
based requirements or limitations on actions taken to address
hazardous wastes. These actions are triggered by particular
remedial activities that are selected to accomplish a remedy.
Since there are several actions to be taken in the off-site
areas, a number of different requirements have been reviewed.
The action-specific requirements do not in themselves determine
the remedial alternative, rather they indicate how a selected
alternative must be achieved.
During the development of the off-site remedial design, action-
specific ARARs for dredging the streams and lake that will be
evaluated include: Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and
U.S. Army Coi"ps of Engineers regulations. Action-specific
regulations regarding-treatment actions that will be utilized
during remedial design include: RCRA regulations regarding
temporary waste piles (staging areas during treatment) and New
Jersey Administrative Code regulations for air emissions (off-
gases from rotary kiln dryer).
A comprehensive list of candidate remedial technologies was
compiled to characterize each technology and determine its
applicability to the off-site Lipari areas. The remedial tech-
nology screening summary, which is included as Table 7, provides
brief rationales as to why some of the technologies screened
were included for or excluded from further consideration.
The technologies that were retained after the preliminary
screening process were assembled in various combinations to
form 19 general response actions for the off-site areas.
These actipns fall into 10 groups: no action, soil covering,
excavation, dredging, on-site treatment, on-site disposal,
off-site disposal, off-site collection systems, and ground
water recovery and treatment. In addition, an interim measure
to suppress volatile emissions originating in the Chestnut
Branch marsh was developed.
-------
-17-
From the 19 general response actions, the components of 24
alternatives and six disposal/placement options were developed
and are presented below. " in addition, alternative-specific
variations involving one or more of the disposal/placement
options and/or excavation options were developed.
Remedial Alternatives
The descriptions of the remedial alternatives are grouped and
presented in the following manner:
Chestnut Branch Marsh Collection System: Alternatives 1-3
Chestnut Branch Marsh Soil Remediation: Alternatives 4-10
Alcyon Lake Remediation: Alternatives 11-12
Rabbit Run Remediation: Alternatives 13-14
Kirkwood Aquifer Collection System: Alternatives 15-16
Chestnut Branch Stream Remediation: Alternatives 17-18
Interim Action for Chestnut Branch Marsh: Alternative 19
ALTERNATIVE 1; WELLPOINTS WEST OF THE SEEPAGE FACE
Alternative 1 involves the installation of a wellpoint system
(60-120 wells) in Chestnut Branch marsh between the seepage
face and the containment system. This wellpoint network would
function as an off-site collection system to capture any seepage
resulting from the on-.-jite flushing action. The collected
seepage would be treated at the on-site treatment facility.
This option would require extensive maintenance. Futhermore,
up to 10 percent of the leachate may not be captured by the
wellpoint system. The approximate locations of Alternatives 1,
2, and 3 are illustrated in Figure 4.
ALTERNATIVE 2a; DRAINAGE DITCH NEAR SEEPAGE FACE
Alternative 2a involves the installation of a French drain near
the base of the leachate seepage face in Chestnut Branch marsh
to collect any seepage from the on-site flushing action. The
drain would capture essentially all of the leachate that may
migrate through the slurry wall. This would ensure that any
future contaminant migration would not affect the off-site areas,
As with Alternative 1, the collected seepage would be treated
at the on-site treatment facility. Excavated marsh soils would
be handle<3 either as a RCRA waste or treated to remove volatile
organics.and disposed of as a non-hazardous material.
ALTERNATIVE 2b; DRAINAGE DITCH NEAR SEEPAGE FACE WITH
IMPERMEABLE COVER
Alternative 2b involves the same technology and steps as does
Alternative 2a. Futhermore, this alternative would require the
-------
-18-
installation of an impermeaJble cap over the drain and portions
of the surrounding marsh. This cap would reduce the amount
of rain water infiltration into the trench as well as further
reduce the possibility of volatile emissions from the marsh
soils between the drain and the slurry wall. The disposal.
options for excavated soils are the same as for Alternative 2a.
The reduction in rainwater infiltration would reduce long-term
operation and maintenance costs associated with leachate collec-
tion and treatment.
ALTERNATIVE 3; WELLPOINTS EAST OF THE SEEPAGE FACE
Alternative 3 involves the installation of a wellpoint system
in Chestnut Branch marsh between the seepage face and Chestnut
Branch to collect any seepage from the on-site flushing
action. As with Alternatives 1 and 2, the collected seepage
would be treated at the on-site treatment facility. It is
expected that this alternative will result in lower water
levels in the marsh, resulting in a reduction in the amount
of volatile emissions associated with the leachate seeps.
This alternative is best suited for selection with a no action
alternative for the marsh itself since the area between the
wellpoints and the slurry wall would expect to be remediated
through natural processes if no action were taken. It is
anticipated that the process of natural degradation would
take several years.
ALTERNATIVE 4; NO ACTION IN CHESTNUT BRANCH MARSH
Under the no action alternative, it is assumed that an off-site
collection system would be implemented to meet the intent of
the September 30, 1985 ROD. T^is alternative would rely on
natural flushing and degradation of contaminants in the marsh
over time. However, for several years, the marsh would con-
tinue as a source of contamination posing a risk to public
health and the environment.
ALTERNATIVE 5; PERMEABLE COVER IN CHESTNUT BRANCH MARSH
Alternative 5 involves the removal of the vegetation in the
marsh and placement of a permeable soil cover over all or a
portion of the marsh soils. While this alternative will result
in a reduction of public health risks associated with contam-
inants in the marsh soils and emissions from the soils, it
would not reduce the amount of contamination present. The
potential for contaminant migration and discharge into Chestnut
Branch stream would continue to exist. The cover would consist
of two to three feet of permeable sand or gravel over approx-
imately 193,000 square feet of the marsh.
ALTERNATIVE 6; IMPERMEABLE COVER IN CHESTNUT BRANCH MARSH
Alternative 6 involves the same technical approach as Alter-
native 5. This alternative also would utilize a synthetic,
impermeable cap on top of the soil cover. The presence of
-------
-19-
the cap would add an additional'measure of safety with respect
to the elimination of contaminant pathways (air emissions and
contact with soils) that have been characterized as posing
potential human health threats. As with Alternative 5, con-
taminants would persist in the underlying marsh soils and
could continue to migrate to Chestnut Branch and impact
local surface water quality.
ALTERNATIVE 7; TOTAL EXCAVATION OF THE CHESTNUT BRANCH MARSH
Alternative 7 involves the excavation of Chestnut Branch marsh
soils to the top of the Kirkwood clay formation. The excavation
activity in the marsh would involve dewatering the marsh area,
clearing and grubbing of the vegetation, excavation, staging
and disposal of the contaminated soil, and soil replacement,
compaction and resoration of the marsh. Appropriate surface
water and sedimentation control measures would be incorporated.
Water from the dewatering operation would be pumped to the
on-site treatment facility. A volume of approximately 71,500
cubic yards would be excavated from the marsh. The removed
soil would then be disposed of in a new on-site RCRA facility
(Option A) or transported for disposal to an off-site RCRA
facility (Option B). -Alternative 7 also contains a cost
option to excavate approximately two feet of soil in Zones l
and 2 of the marsh, while excavating approximately 10 feet of
soil from Zone 3, the area of highest contamination. Organic
contaminants have been detected in the surface soils of Zone
1 and 2 at lower concentrations than in Zone 3. Excavation
and disposal of. marsh soils would result in elimination of
contaminant pathways associated with the marsh.
ALTERNATIVE 8; PARTIAL EXCAVATION OF CHESTNUT BRANCH MARSH
Partial excavation of Chestnut Branch marsh involves excava-
tion of approximately 19,900 cubic yards of soil from Zone 3
within the marsh. This is the area characterized as the area
of active leachate seeps and hazardous emissions. Contaminants
present in the surface soils in other areas of the marsh may
continue to migrate to surface waters. The disposal of the
contain! nan ted soil would be via Disposal Option A or B. The
activities associated with the implementation of this altern-
ative are the same as those described for Alternative 7.
ALTERNATIVE 9a; TOTAL EXCAVATION OF CHESTNUT BRANCH MARSH,
TREATMENT FOR ORGANICS, REPLACE SOILS IN
THE MARSH.
Alternative 9a involves the complete excavation of marsh soils
to the top of the Kirkwood clay, followed by treatment with a
rotary *iln drier. This alternative includes the same activities
associated with the implementation of Alternative 7 except that
contaminated soils would be transported to a temporary storage-
area where they would be thermally treated with a rotary kiln
drier to remove organics prior to their disposal. The staging
area would comply with RCRA regulations that detail the design
and construction of temporary waste storage areas. The rotary
drier unit would be located in the staging area.
-------
J
-20-
A rotary kiln drier operates at temperatures up to about 600'F.
The material placed in such a unit is constantly turned over
and mixed as the kiln rotates. The operating temperature win
result in substantial removal of organic contaminants from
the soil; however, metals are not expected to be significantly
affected by this technology. The off-gases from this unit
would be captured on carbon filters or a similar adsorbent,
or be treated.
The treated soil would be placed back into the marsh and the
marsh would be restored. However, due to the wet marsh
environment, soils placed back in the marsh may continue to
be a source of contaminant (metals) migration to nearby
surface waters. This alternative also contains a cost option
for limited excavation of Zones 1 and 2 and total excavation
of Zone 3 similar to the one described in Alternative 7.
ALTERNATIVE 9b; TOTAL EXCAVATION OF CHESTNUT BRANCH MARSH,
TREATMENT FOR ORGANICS, DISPOSAL OF SOILS
AS A NON-HAZARDOUS MATERIAL
This alternative involves the same activities associated with
the implementation of alternative 9a except that treated soils
would then be disposed of as a non-hazardous material. This
alternative also has a similar cost option for excavation to
approximately two feet. Alternative 9b differs in that the
treated soils may be classifiable as non-hazardous and be
disposed in a suitable off-site location. In the FS, Alcyon
Racetrack, two municipal landfills, and disposal on top of
the Lipari Landfill, were evaluated for placement of the
treated soil. Restoration actions would be undertaken at the
marsh.
ALTERNATIVE 10a; PARTIAL EXCAVATION OF CHESTNUT BRANCH MARSH,
TREATMENT FOR ORGANICS, REPLACE SOILS IN
THE MARSH
Alternative lOa involves excavation of approximately 19,900
cubic yards of soils from Zone 3 in the marsh. This altern-
ative utilizes the same technology and steps as Alternative 9a.
Contaminants present in the other areas of the marsh could
continue to migrate to local surface waters. Restoration
actions would be undertaken for the marsh.
ALTERNATIVE IQb: PARTIAL EXCAVATION OF CHESTNUT BRANCH MARSH,
TREATMENT FOR ORGANICS, DISPOSAL OF SOILS
AS A NON-HAZARDOUS MATERIAL
Alternative lOb involves excavation and thermal treatment of
approximately 19,900 cubic yards of soils from Zone 3 of the
marsh and also includes a costing option for similar actions
in Zones 1 and 2 to approximately two feet. This alternative
utilizes the same technology and steps as Alternative 9b.
Restoration actions would be undertaken for the marsh. Disposal
of the sediments in a drier environment would minimize any
potential migration of metals into local surface waters.
-------
-21-
ALTERNATIVE 11; NO ACTION TO REMEDIATE ALCYON LAKE SEDIMENTS
Under the no action alternative, it is assumed that an off-site
collection system would intercept contaminant migration to the
sediments and surface waters of Alcyon Lake. Once upstream
contaminant pathways were eliminated, in a relatively short
period of time the contaminant concentrations in the water
column would be expected to decline. However, contaminants
.present in the sediments would persist for an undetermined
period of time. The potential for contaminants leaching from
the sediments into the water column would continue.
ALTERNATIVE 12a; DREDGE AND DEWATER SEDIMENTS FROM ALCYON
LAKE, DISPOSAL OF SEDIMENTS IN A RCRA FACILITY
Alternative 12a involves the hydraulic dredging of the sediments
from Alcyon Lake, followed by dewatering with filter presses
or similar equipment. The filter press water would be routed
to the on-site treatment facility. Approximately 140,000
cubic yards of dredged material would be pumped from the lake
directly to portable filter presses located near the shore.
The water removed from the dredged material would be discharged
to the on-site treatment facility. The final volume of the
dewatered sediments is estimated to be 56,000 cubic yards.
The dewatered sediments would then be placed in a new on-site
RCRA facility '(Option A) or transported to an off-site RCRA
facility (Option B) for disposal. The activities involved in
transportation and the disposal at either facility.would be the
same as in Alternative 7. This alternative would result in the
removal, of contaminated sediments, and the potential for contam-
inant leaching from the sediments into the lake waters wou^d be
eliminated.
ALTERNATIVE 12b; DREDGE AND DEWATER SEDIMENTS FROM ALCYON LAKE,
TREATMENT FOR ORGANICS, DISPOSAL OF SOILS
AS A NON-HAZARDOUS MATERIAL
This alternative involves the same activities associated with
the dredging of .sediments from Alcyon Lake as discussed in
Alternative 12a, but includes thermal treatment of sediments
to remove organic contaminants and disposal as a non-hazardous
material. After dewatering, the sediments, would be treated
thermally with a rotary kiln drier to remove organic contami-
nants. The sediments may then be classifiable as non-hazardous
and placed at a suitable off-site location. As in Alternative
12a, this alternative would remove the contaminated sediments,
thereby eliminating any potential contaminant leaching from
the sediments into the water of the lake.
ALTERNATIVE 13; NO ACTION IN RABBIT RUN
Under this no action alternative, contaminants present in Rabbit
Run'would continue to persist and affect the water quality of
Rabbit, Run and downstream receiving waters.
-------
-22-
ALTERNATIVE 14a: DREDGE AND DEWATER RABBIT RUN SEDIMENTS, DISPOSAL
OF SEDIMENTS IN A RCRA FACILITY
Alternative 14a involves the removal of approximately 400 cubic
yards of Rabbit Run sediments with a backhoe or similar equip-
ment and placement in a dewatering basin to separate the water
and the solids. The dewatered liquids would be treated at the
on-site facility. The solids would be disposed of in a new
on-site RCRA facility (Option A) or transported to an off-site
RCRA facility (Option B) for disposal. Restoration actions
would be taJcen for Rabbit Run as necessary.
ALTERNATIVE 14bt DREDGE AND DEWATER RABBIT RUN SEDIMENTS,
TREATMENT FOR ORGANICS, DISPOSAL OF SEDIMENTS
AS A NON-HAZARDOUS MATERIAL
Alternative 14b utilizes the same technology as Alternative 14a
with an additional treatment step. After dewatering, the sed-
iments would be treated with a rotary kiln drier to remove
organic contaminants. The sediments may then be classifiable
as non-hazardous and placed at a suitable off-site location.
Liquids would be treated at the on-site facility. Restoration
actions would be taken for Rabbit Run as needed.
ALTERNATIVE 15; NO ACTION IN THE KIRKWOOD AQUIFER
Under this no action alternative, contaminants present in the
Kirkwood aquifer would continue to migrate. The off-site RI
reports indicate that the Kirkwood aquifer discharges locally
into Chestnut Branch and Alcyon Lake. While this aquifer is
not utilized as a drinking water source in the study area,
contaminants discharged to surface waters are likely to result
in contaminant levels that exceed Federal Water Quality Criteria
for surface waters as indicated by evaluations performed
during the on-site RI/FS.
ALTERNATIVE 16; PUMP AND TREAT THE KIRKWOOD AQUIFER
Alternative 16 involves the utilization of existing Kirkwood
wells and the installation of pumps and a piping system to
the on-site treatment facility. The Kirkwood aquifer would
be pumped for the duration of the on-site flushing to ensure
that all existing and potential future contamination is
contained, removed and treated. If needed, pumping would
continue after the flushing effort has been completed. Pumping
rates, duration of pumping, and cleanup levels to insure the
protection of surface water quality, and monitoring associated
with this alternative will be incorporated into the monitoring
plan thdt is being developed to evaluate the effectiveness of
the on-site remedial actions.
ALTERNATIVE 17; NO ACTION IN CHESTNUT BRANCH STREAM
Under this no action alternative, contaminants present in
Chestnut Branch stream would not be remediated. A potential
-------
-23-
for adverse affects on the water quality of the stream would
continue to exist due to the leaching of contaminants from
the stream sediments.
ALTERNATIVE 18a; DREDGE AND DEWATER CHESTNUT BRANCH SEDIMENTS,
DISPOSAL AT A RCRA FACILITY
Alternative 18a involves the same technology and disposal
options as Alternative 14a for the Rabbit Run sediments.
Restoration actions would be undertaken for Chestnut Branch
as necessary.
ALTERNATIVE 18b: DREDGE AND DEWATER CHESTNUT BRANCH SEDIMENTS,
TREATMENT FOR ORGANICS, DISPOSAL AS A
NON-HAZARDOUS MATERIAL
Alternative 18b involves the same technology and disposal
options as Alternative 14b for Rabbit Run. Restoration
actions would be undertaken for Chestnut Branch as necessary.
ALTERNATIVE 19: INTERIM MEASURE IN CHESTNUT BRANCH MARSH
Alternative 19 involves the undertaking of temporary remedial
measures in Chestnut Branch marsh to mitigate volatile emissions
from the seepage face,areas. This measure would be undertaken
when hazardous emissions from the marsh are considered to pose
a potential human health threat. Volatile emissions from the
marsh are most pronounced during the warmer Spring and Summer
months. The interim measures could involve clearing the
vegetation in portions of Zone 3 of the marsh followed by the
placement of absorpitve materials and a temporary cap, or the
possible use of vapor' suppressant technologies. Vapor suppres-
sant foams are available but require repeated applications to
be effective. The placement of absorptive materials and a
temporary cap would be effective and require little or no
maintenance.
DISPOSAL OPTIONS DISCUSSION
In addition to returning treated soils and sediments to their
places of origin, the marsh, the streams, the lake, and six
other locations were fully evaluated as potential locations for
the disposal or placement of treated and non-treated materials.
A discussion of the individual disposal options is presented
below.
OPTION
~~('AKConstruct a New On-Site RCRA Facility.
x
While thex construction of a new on-site RCRA facility is
technically feasible, there are several considerations that
detract from this option as a preferred disposal location. The
-------
-25-
modified to accomodate the addition of three to five feet of
treated soils. The impact of this additional soil on the
integrity of the existing cap is unknown. Furthermore, while
flushing of contaminants has proved successful at other at
other hazardous waste sites, and preliminary tests indicate
that it also will be successful at the Lipari site, EPA has
maintained that, in the event flushing is not successful at
Lipari, other remedial measures will be pursued. The presence
of additional material on the existing site would add a
measure of difficulty in the event of any future intrusive
activities, including on-site soil monitoring.
D) Dispose of Treated Materials at the Gloucester County
Municipal Landfill.
Disposal of treated soils and sediments at this facility would
attain ARARs, reduce mobility, and utilize treatment as a
permanent remedy. The cost would be significantly higher than
placement at either Alcyon Racetrack or the Lipari Landfill.
There also may exist a problem with resource capacity or avail-
ability.
Landfill capacity and the need for fill material is very limited
in ^Jew Jersey. The availability of the use of municipal landfill
cells for treated, non-hazardous material is uncertain. Similar
institutional problems may be encountered in proposing to use
the treated material as fill or cover. Also, it is possible
that the community where the landfill facility is located may
be hesitant to accept materials, even though treated, from a
Superfund site. Further, disposal at a municipal facility
would require extensive truck t affic during transportation.
Conversely, the use of Alcyon Racetrack as a placement location
would not require truck traffic in Pitman or in the surrounding
communities.
(E) Disposal at Montgomery County Suburban Landfill of Treated
Materials.
The same advantages and disadvantages apply to this option as
exists for the Gloucester County Municipal Landfill.
The placement of treated material back into Alcyon Lake was
rejected in the FS because of concerns over blocking artesian
springs originating in the Kirkwood aquifer. The increase in
flow to Alcyon Lake provided by these springs will assist in
attaining the goal of maintaining fishable/swimmable water
quality in Alcyon Lake. Futhermore, metals are not expected to
--be_js ig_ni ficantly affected by the treatment process. At present,
there aiV~n,q promulgated standards or guidelines to address
contaminant"concentrations in sediments. However, it is accepted
scientific knowledge that many contaminants, especially metals,
s
\
-------
-26-
are significantly more mobile in a sediment/water interface
than are metals in a soil that is not in contact with ground
water. Daily fluctuations in the pH of aquatic systems, as well
as the activity of benthic organisms, lead to increases in the
dissolution of metals from sediments to the aqueous phase. The
alternatives that utilize treatment and placement of treated
soils and sediments in non-aqueous environments will provide
better assurances of maintaining surface water quality.
SUMMARY OF THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES
The previously discussed alternatives were evaluated using
evaluation criteria derived from the NCP and the Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986. The criteria
relate directly to factors mandated by SARA in Section 121,
including Section 121(b)(1)(A-G) and EPA Interim Guidance on
Selection of Remedy (December 24, 1986 and July 24, 1987). The
criteria are as follows:
4 Compliance with legally applicable or relevant and appropriate
requirements (ARARs) .
4 Reduction of toxicity, mobility or volume
4 Short-term effectiveness
4 Long-term effectiveness
4 Implementability
4 Protection of human health and the environment
4 Community acceptance
4 State acceptance
4 Cost
A summary of the discussion of these criteria, with the except-
ion of State acceptance, is contained in Table 8. Due to the
high level of agreement between EPA and NJDEP on the proposed
remedial actions in the off-site areas, a separate column was
not presented in the summary.. The criteria of protection of -
human health and the environment was divided into two.columns
to more fully describe these two important areas. A discussion
of the objectives of the nine evaluation criteria is provided
below.
•
Compliance with ARARs
Section 121(d) of CERCLA, as amended by SARA, requires that
remedial actions comply with all applicable or relevant and
appropriate Federal and State requirements for the hazardous
-------
-27-
substances, pollutants, or contaminants that are present and
attributable to a site. The contaminated soils and sediments
in the off-site areas are impacting the quality of water in
contact with the soils of Chestnut Branch marsh and the sedi-
ments of Rabbit Run, Chestnut Branch stream and Alcyon Lake.
As such, cleanup of these areas is necessary to achieve water
quality ARARs. The same rationale applies to the marsh ground
water collection system. The alternatives that utilize treat-
ment, and placement of treated soils and sediments in non-aqueous
environments will provide better assurances to maintaining
surface water quality. These includes Alternatives 7b, 9b, 12a,
12b, 14a, 14b, 18a, and 18b.
Contaminants in marsh soils outside of the slurry wall serve
as a reservoir for future contaminant migration to adjacent
surface waters. Collection of ground water in the marsh will
intercept these contaminants as well as any potential migration
of contaminants in ground water that may occur as a result of
the on-site flushing activities. Alternative 2a and 2b pro-
vide the best assurances of capturing leachate in the marsh,
and in meeting the intent of the September 30, 1985 ROD. The
marsh collection system will be placed as close to the slurry
wall as possible within the limits of construction technology.
Soil east and north of the collection system in the marsh
will be excavated and thermally treated to remove organic
contaminants that are presently affecting water quality in
downstream receiving waters. The rotary drier technology
will result in the removal of organic contaminants from the
marsh soils. • In order to avoid creating an air emission
problem, vapor controls shall be utilized in order to meet,
at a minimum, NJDEP air emission standards (NJAC Title 7,
Chapter 27, Subchapter 17). Specific technological consider-
ations such as retention time, operating temperatures, and
optimum vapor collection technologies will be determined
during the remedial design.
Ground water extraction from the Kirkwood aquifer (Alternative
16) is also being undertaken to protect surface water quality
and to meet the.intent of the September 30, 1985 ROD. In
New Jersey, the Kirkwood aquifer is classified as a GW-2 drinking
water aquifer. In the immediate vicinity of the Lipari Landfill
site, the Kirkwood is not utilized as a drinking water source.
Due to the poor yield of the formation (Off-Site RI, phases l
and 2) and the abundance of high yeild aquifers in the local
area, it is unlikely that the Kirkwood aquifer in the site
vicinity would be utilized as a drinking water source in the
future. The area of contamination in the Kirkwood is confined
"tcPEheupper_portiori of the formation. The Kirkwood has been
characterized as~~flowing upwards into Chestnut Branch stream,
with this surface water stream acting as the discharge point
and hydrologic boundary\for contaminant migration in the Kirkwood
aquifer. For these reasons, in this unique situation, the
-------
-28-
application of surface water standards should be applied to
cleanup goals for the Kirkwood aquifer. Chestnut Branch and
Alcyon Lake are classified as FW2-NT. The surface water quality
criteria for this classification are listed in Table 6. For
those compounds, such as bis(2-chlorethyl)ether that are not
listed in the FW2-NT classification, Federal Water Quality
Criteria established under the Clean Water Act should be applied
as a guideline for cleanup goals. A chemical-specific list of
compounds detected in the Kirkwood aquifer and corresponding
Federal Water Quality Criteria are listed in Table 6.
The need for additional extraction wells to best ensure that
contaminants present in the Kirkwood aquifer are removed in
order to minimize impact on surface water quality will be deter-
mined during remedial design. The extraction and treatment of
ground water from this formation should continue, at a minimum,
for the duration of the on-site flushing. The specific rate of
flushing and any allowable residual concentration of contami-
nants will be incorporated into the Monitoring Plan and will
reflect surface water quality criteria. A similar approach
will be taken with respect to the collection of leachate in
the marsh area.
The placement of treated soils and sediments at the Alcyon
Racetrack would not exceed current RCRA guidelines concerning
the disposal of 'treated materials. Soils and sediments have
been examined using the Extraction Procedure Toxicity (EP-TOX)
test for metals and pesticides. The tested materials have
not exhibited hazardous characteristics associated with the
EP-TOX procedure and have not been classified as a listed
waste, therefore, are not considered to be a RCRA waste. I..
addition to the EP-TOX procedure, the Toxic Characteristics
Leaching Procedure (TCLP) which includes an analysis for organic
compounds has been developed to further define leaching character-
istics. The EP-TOX procedure will be used on treated materials
during remediation to ensure a level of treatment that is protective
of human health and the environment. Additional tests such as
the TCLP test will be utilized as needed to ensure that effective
treatment that is protective of human health and the environment
is achieved.
Reduction of Toxicity. Mobility or Volume
This evaluation criteria involves the performance of a tech-
nology or remedial alternative in terms of eliminating or
controlling risks posed by the toxicity, mobility or volume
(TMV) of hazardous substances. The ability of each alternative
to attain this criteria is summarized in Table 9. Alternatives
that uti'lize treatment provide the best assurances that a
reduction in TMV will be achieved. Off-site collection will
reduce the mobility of contaminants in the ground water,
on-site treatment will reduce toxicity and volume. For the
-------
-29-
marsh, Alternatives 2a and 2b provide the best assurances that
TMV win be reduced. Alternative 2b will reduce the amount
of clean water infiltration to the trench, thereby reducing the
total volume of collected material to be .treated. Alternatives
9b, 12b, 14b, and 18b provide the best assurances for TMV reduction
in the marsh, streams and lake. These alternatives all
utilize treatment technologies. Excavation and RCRA disposal
does not affect the toxicity or volume; treatment followed by
replacement in original areas does not affect the mobility of
metals. " .. '
Short-Term Effectiveness
The short-term effectiveness criteria measures how well an
alternative is expected to perform, the time to achieve per-
formance, and the potential adverse impacts of its implemen-
tation. Alternatives that utilize excavation and/or excavation
and treatment have an increased potential for short-term adverse
impacts associated with short-term exposure to contaminant
releases. This includes Alternatives 6 through 10 (a and b),
Alternatives 12 a and b, 14 a and b, and 18 a and b. The
short-term impacts of the alternatives are summarized in Table 9.
These impacts can be mitigated through proper health and safety
controls.
Long-Term Effectiveness and Permanence
Long-term.effectiveness and permanence addresses the long-
term protection and.reliability of an alternative. The evalua-
tion of. the alternatives under this criteria is presented in
Table 9. The removal and treatment of contaminated soils and
sediments will ensure-that water quality and air quality goals
are met. Alternatives 9b, lOb, 12b, 14b, and 18b achieve
these goals. Alternatives 2b and 16 will provide assurances
that contaminated ground water does not impact local surface
waters. Specific engineering considerations of the rotary kiln
technology such as operating temperature, retention time, and
off-gas treatment will be determined during the remedial
design. Optimisation of these parameters to maximize the
removal of contaminants coupled with proper soil engineering
practices will ensure that the placement of treated materials
at the Alcyon Racetrack will not require future monitoring and
will result in a permanent remedy. As described previously and
shown in Table 8, residual metals are not expected to pose a
human health or environmental concern.
Implementability
Implemehtability addresses how easy or difficult, feasible or
infeasible, it would be to carry out a given alternative. This
covers implementation from design through construction and
operation and maintenance. The implementability of the altern-
ative is evaluated in terms of technical and administrative
-------
-30-
feasibility, and availability of needed goods and services.
All alternatives have resource requirements with the exception
of the No Action alternatives (4, 11, 13, 15, and 17). All
actions utilize resources that have been implemented with avail-
able, proven technologies. The summary of the evaluation of
the alternatives under this criteria is presented in Table 9.
Protection of Human Health and the Environment
Protection of human health and the environment is the central
mandate of CERCLA as amended by SARA. Protection is achieved
by taking appropriate actions to ensure that there will be no
unacceptable risks to human health and the environment through
any exposure pathways.
The excavation, dredging, dewatering, thermal treatment (Altern-
atives 2b, 9b, lOb, 12b, 14b, 16 and I8b), and final placement
of treated materials at the Alcyon Racetrack coupled with the
on-site flushing/leachate collection and treatment action win
ensure that the existing off-site contamination from the Lipari
Landfill is permanently removed from the environment and that
no future off-site contaminant migration occurs.
Contaminated soils and sediments in the off-site areas passed
the EP-TOX test and, therefore, are not considered to exhibit
adverse leaching characteristics relative to metals and
pesticides. Material as it is processed will be analyzed
using the EP-TOX test for leaching characteristics and other-
tests such as the TCLP test, which includes analyses for volatile
organics, as needed. Target Compound List (TCL) analyses for
individual hazardous compounds will also be performed during
treatment to ensure that the treated materials conform with
acceptable environmental guidelines such as those established
by the State of New Jersey for soil cleanup.
The impacts on the health and safety of workers and nearby
residents will be closely monitored during remedial actions.
.Excavation in the Chestnut Branch marsh is likely to cause the
most significant environmental and human health concerns due to
the potential for contact with contaminated soil by workers,
inhalation of hazardous volatile organics during excavation,
and transport of contaminated sediments to downstream receiving
waters.
Appropriate measures would need to be taken during excavation
of the marsh soils to protect workers and nearby residents.
Among the candidate possibilities for reducing volatile
emissions and improving construction conditions are the
~'fcTl-lowing ;
' Lowerinq of the ground water table in the immediate vicinity.
This may^be accomplished by one or more of the following
methods: dewatering the containment system; pumping from
-------
-31-
well points in the Cohansey; pumping from well points in
the Kirkwood, temporarily rerouting Chestnut Branch and/or
Rabbit Run.
* The use of vapor suppressant technologies such as vapor
suppressant foam and portable inflatable worktents.
The workers and residents would be protected through measures
outlined in project-specific health and safety plans and
through contractor adherance to Occupational Safety and Health
Act (OSHA) regulations. Strict air monitoring at the construc-
tion site as well as in the nearby residential areas would
need to be implemented. Noise associated with the rotary
drier unit may need to be mitigated through noise suppressant
housing or insulation. It is not anticipated that any such
noise would be noticible except possibly during night-time
operation, if night-time operation is acceptable to the local
community. Dust and particulate matter are not expected to
be a concern due to the damp nature of the marsh soils and
the lake and stream sediments.
The disturbance of soils during marsh excavation and sediments
during dredging will likely result in an increase in suspended
sediments that may carry contaminants into the local surface
waters. Rerouting of streams, the use of silt curtains, and
limiting the flow of water at the Alcyon Lake spillway would
all result in a minimization of the transport of suspended
solids in local surface waters.
Community Acceptance
This evaluation criterion addresses the degree to which members
of the local community support the remedial alternatives being
evaluated.
The community has shown a great deal of support for the
proposed off-site cleanup. The mayor and the town council of
the Borough of Pitman moved to purchase the Alcyon Racetrack
in order to expedite the off-site cleanup action. The Borough
already owned the adjacent park and had debated purchasing
the racetrack and adjoining woods for several months. By
purchasing that property, Pitman has assured that:
(1) land for placement of treated materials will be available;
(2) a complete staging and disposal area is removed from
residential areas;
(3) trucK~traTTSportatlon traffic will not impact the local
communities; and —-
x
(4) remediation can be performed at ^.relatively low cost.
-------
-32-
Mr. Douglas Zee ovms the property (orchards) between the landfill
and the racetrack. Discussions with Mr. Zee indicate that he
is willing to allow truck access to roads on his property
between the Lipari Landfill and the racetrack. The completion
of a formal access and easement agreement with Mr. Zee would
ensure that truck traffic impact in the community is kept to
a minimum. Existing roads are shown in Figure 1. The specific
concerns of the community with regard to the remedial activities
include, suppression of volatile emissions during excavation
and dredging, noise associated with the rotary drier, off-gas
collection/treatment of contaminants from the rotary drier,
testing of treated materials during and after treatment to
assure effectiveness of the treatment, potential public health
and environmental impacts associated with residuals in treated
materials, final aesthetic appearance of the racetrack area,
and use restrictions on the racetrack area. Detailed
responses to the community concerns are contained in the
Responsivness Summary (Attachment F).
A corollary issue associated with the impact of the Lipari Land-
fill on Alcyon Lake is the need for a watershed management plan
to address other point and non-point sources of pollution which
may impact the lake. Efforts are underway to integrate the
off-site remediation with the goals of a comprehensive watershed
management plan.
Cost
Costs are evaluated in terms of capital costs, operation and
maintence costs, and present worth costs. These items are
included in Table 9. The costs associated with the prefered
off-site remediation of Alcyon Lake, Rabbit Run and Chestnut
Branch stream represent the lowest costs for the remediation of
these areas. This is significant in that the prefered alternatives
also involve treatment to achieve a permanent remedy. The cost
associated with remediating Chestnut Branch marsh is not the
lowest, however, it does provide the greatest assurance for
protection of public health and the environment.
•
The collection of leachate (Alternatives 2b and 16) addresses
the requirements of the September 30, 1985 ROD. Alternative 16
will utilize the existing wells to the extent that it is feasible
(a pumping network will be required and the need for additional
wells will be evaluated during the remedial design) as well as
the on-site treatment facility. Costs associated with this
option primarily involve operation and maintenance. Collection
-of—leachate in the marsh area, Alternative 2b, is not the least
expensiv*e~~alt.ernative for collection of seepage in the marsh.
However, it does provide the greatest degree of public health and
environmental protection and, further, has the lowest operation
and maintenance costs. The range of costs associated with
Alternatives 1, 2a, 2b, and 3 vary by less than 10 percent
($5,788,000 to $6,365,000). Table 10 shows the costs associated
with the preferred alternatives, and the range associated with
other candidate alternatives for the same operable unit.
-------
-33-
SELECTED REMEDY
Through the comparative analysis described in the preceeding
section and as outlined in Table 9 and in the off-site FS, the
remedy that has been selected which provides the best balance
among the criteria and satisfies the statutory requirements of
Section 121 of CERCLA, as amended, is a combination of Altern-
atives 2b, 9b (Option 2) 12b, 14b, 16, 18b, and 19 with place-
ment of treated materials at the Alcyon Racetrack. The off-
site collection system (Alternatives 2b and 16) will ensure
that contaminated ground water in the Cohansey and Kirkwood
aquifers does not discharge into Chestnut Branch stream. These
actions will ensure that surface water criteria under the Clear.
Water Act and New Jersey surface water standards are achieved.
Alternative 9b will ensure that contaminants present in the
Chestnut Branch marsh do not continue to migrate and impact
local surface waters and sediments. Exposure routes for air
inhalation and soil contact characterized as posing potential
long-term human health threats will also be eliminated. Altern-
ative 12b will remove and treat contaminated sediments that
contain contaminants present in the water column of the lake at
levels that exceed FWQC. Additionally, BCEE has been detected
in fish tissue from the fish of Alcyon Lake. Ingestion of fish
from the lake was characterized as an exposure pathway associated
with a long-term human health threat. Appropriate sampling and
any necessary removal, relocation, and/or restocking of aquatic
wildlife will be made prior to lake remediation. Alternatives
14b and 18b will remove and treat contaminated sediments in '
Rabbit Run and Chestnut Branch stream that contain contaminants
present' in the water column at levels that exceed surface water
criteria and standards. All o~f the downstream and downgradient
areas have been shown to contain elevated levels of Lipari
related contaminants.
The use of the Alcyon Racetrack as an area to place treated,
non-hazardous material will be in compliance with ARARs, provide
protection of human health and the environment, is easily
implemented, will provide long-term effectiveness, and has the
support of the local community. At present, the only guidelines
available for soils are New Jersey soil cleanup objectives. As
discussed earlier, treated material is expected to be within
the guidelines of those objectives. During remedial design
activities the determination of site-specific information such
as soil properties and depth to ground water will be incorp-
orated into a determination of minimum site specific cleanup
levels for soils and sediments prior to their placement at the.
racetrack. The levels that will be set will ensure—protec-t ion __
of humaij. health and the environment. The estimated cost asso-
ciated with the selected remedy is $21 million (Table 10).
-------
-34-
i
STATUTORY FINDINGS/SUMMARY
The selected remedy satisfies the nine evaluation criteria to
the greatest degree of the alternatives examined.
The Agency has been explicitly directed by Congress in Section
121(b) of CERCLA, as amended, to select remedial actions
which utilize permanent solutions and alternative treatment
technologies or resource recovery options to the maximum
extent practicable. In addition, the Agency is to prefer
remedial actions that permanently and significantly reduce
the mobility, toxicity or volume of site wastes. Applying
this statutory preference here, Alternatives 9b, 12b, 14b and
18b provide the greatest degree of long-term effectiveness
and permanence by utilizing a treatment technology that will
permanently remove organic contaminants attributable to the
Lipari Landfill in the off-site areas. In addition, excavation
and dredging will also fulfill the preference for permanent
elimination or reduction of the public health and environmental
risk. Because of the potential mobility of the contaminants
in sediments and the bioaccumulation in fish, this permanent
solution is appropriate. There would be virtually no residual
risk associated with this alternative since the organic
contaminants would be removed through the thermal treatment
process and the excavation and dredging plans. Also, there
would be no need for eventual replacement of the remedy since
the residuals from the treatment process will be non-hazardous.
Finally, this remedy is reliable and will avoid the long-term
uncertainties associated with land disposal of untreated
wastes. Hence, protection of human health and the environment
on a long-term permanent basis is best assured by the selected
actions. "These actions, coupled with leachate collection and
treatment in the Cohansey and Kirkwood aquifers (Alternatives
2b and 16), ensure the permanent elimination of Lipari related
contaminants in the off-site environment.
The thermal treatment process would comply with all action
specific .ARARs. In addition, the residuals from the thermal
treatment would be determined non-hazardous and would not pose
a threat to human health or the environment through any
exposure pathway.
The Agency believes that the rotary kiln drier technology is
available and reliable for the treatment of contaminated
soils and sediments existing in the vicinity of the Lipari
Landfill site. This technology has been successfully imple-
mented at the McKin Superfund site in Gray, Maine to remove
volatile organics and PAHs (pol-yaromatic-Jiydrocarbons) from
soils. ,The land area is available for the "siting-o-f-.~t.he
treatment process units and placement of the treated, non-
hazardous soils and sediments. Pilot testing of the equip-
ment would be utilized to ensure the operational reliability^
-------
-35-
of the unit on site-specific soils and sediments. Although
this remedy would require measures to control possible risks
related to construction and operation (e.g. air emissions),
the Agency's analysis indicates that all of these factors can
be adequately controlled.
The capital costs for thermal treatment of the soils and
sediments followed by placement at the Alcyon Racetrack are
less than the costs associated with disposal (with or without
treatment) at a municipal or RCRA facility. Futhermore,
because the thermal treatment process represents a permanent
remedy, there would be no long-term operation and maintenance
costs associated with future monitoring. While the selection
of the remedy involves the balancing of costs and effectiveness
against the relative benefits of each alternative, the Agency
is statutorily required to favor remedies that are permanent
and that utilize treatment technologies which permanently and
significantly reduce the toxicity, mobility or volume of the
contaminants.
The selected actions represent the best balance of the nine
evaluation criteria and are cost-effective, permanent solutions
to contamination problems existing in the environment.
The community prefers that all of the contaminated" soils and
sediments in the off-site areas be excavated/dredged and
treated to permanently remove contaminants. While there has
been some local apprehension at placing the non-hazardous
treated materials at the Alcyon Racetrack, the majority of
the local citizens and elected officials strongly favor this
option. The .. rimary community concerns to be addressed
during remediation will be noise, odors, and vapor controls
associated with the remedial actions. In addition, demonstra-
tion of the effectiveness of the treatment processs would be
required. Restoration of the racetrack area to an acceptable
aesthetic level would also be required.
The selected remedy would be protective of human health and
the environment'by: 1) utilizing treatment to reduce toxicity
and mobility of the waste; 2) being the most effective and
permanent solution in the long-term; 3) being relatively easy
to implement; and 4) assuring short-term effectiveness.
Furthermore, Altenatives 2b and 16 would meet the intent of
the September 30, 1985 ROD relative to leachate collection.
In summary, EPA has selected Alternatives 2b, 9b, 12b, 14b,
16, 18b, and 19 because they are protective of human health
and the environment, will attain all applicable or relevant
and appropriate requirements, are cost-effective, and utilize
permanent solutions and treatment technologies or resource
recovery options to the maximum extent practicable. Addition-
-------
-36-
ally, since these alternatives employ thermal treatment to
eliminate the principal threat at the site, this option would
also satisfy SARA'S preference for remedies which employ treat-
ment as their principal element to permanently and significantly
reduce toxicity, mobility or volume of the contaminants.
-------
SECTION V
ATTACHMENTS
-------
ATTACHMENT A
GROUNDWATER CHARACTERISTICS
OF LIPARI LANDFILL SAMPLES
-------
GROUND WATER CHARACTERISTICS OF LIPARI LANDFILL SAMPLES
LiPari Landfill aanpling
Radian Corp.
Volatile organic
contaminant
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Benzene
Brooofons
Brooooethane
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chlorobrooo methane
Chloroethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl ether
Chloroform
Chlorooethane
Dichlorobrooooethane
Dichlorodifluoromethane
1,1-Di chloroethane
1,2-Di chloroethane
1 , 1-Di chloroethylene
1,2-Dichloropropane
1 , 3-D! chloropropy lene
Ethylbenzene
Methyl bromide
Ethene di bromide
Methyl chloride
Methylene chloride
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
trans -1 ,2-Dlchloroethene
1,1, 1-Trichloroethan*
1 , 1 ,2-Tri chloroethane
Trl chloroethylene
Trichlor of luorome thane
Vinyl chloride
Total volatile organic
compounds
Field*
1983
(ppb)
NR
NR
3,000
NR
NR
NR
18
NR
12
NR
8
NR
NR
NR
54
5,900
4
NR
• NR
1,000
NR
NR
NR
510
NA
7
9,900
26
1
NR
14
NR
10
NR
L.bb
1983
(ppb)
NR
NR
4,500
NR
NR
NR
<50
NR
<50
NR
48
NR
NR
NR
<50
8,100
<50
NR
NR
420
NR
NR
NR
3,300
NR
<50
30,000
<50
<50
NR
<50
NR
<50
NR
JRBC
9/26/83
(ppb)
NA
ND
5,900
<500g
NA
<100g
270
<100g
47,<100g
<250g
760
NA
300
<250g
760
5,500,<69,000
78
24,00*
7,<250g
4,400
<500g
NA
c.ooo8
39,000
<500g
40,<100g
75,000
360
<250g
21,<100g
<250g
96,<100g
NA
IT Corpc
9-10/84
(ppb)
<500
<500
2,200
<50
NA
<50
110
<50
<50
500
<50
NA
<50
<500
18
41,000
<50
<5C
50
2,000
<500
NA
<500
2,800
<50
130
37,000
88
<50
<50
220
<50
<500
NR
JRBC'd CD-6"'
12/84-4/85 3/85
(ppb) (ppb)
NA
NA
29,000 1
NA
NA
NA
NA 1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
630
54,000 75
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
46,000 17
NA
NA
87,000 2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA 176
NA
NA
,371
<10g
<1C*
<10g
,005
<10£
<10g
<10g
750
<10*
<10*
<10g
58S
,459
145
-------
GROUND WATER CHARACTERISTICS OF LIPARI LANDFILL SAMPLES
UParl Landfill Mnpllng
Radian Corp.
Extractable contaminant
Acid extractables:
2-^hlorophenol
2 , 4-Di chl orophenol
2, 4-Dinethyl phenol
1,4-Dinltrophenol
4,6-Dinitro-2.-cresol
2,4-Dinitrophenol
2-Nitrophenol
4-N'itrophenol
£-Chl QTQ-W-C resol
2-Methyl^4,6-dinitrophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Phenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
Base-neutral extractables:
Acenaphthene
Aceoaphthylene
Anthracene
Benzidine
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
3,4-Benzof luoranthene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Benzo(k)f luoranthene
bis_(2-Chloroetho'xy)«etfuine
bi8(2-Chloroethyl)ether
bis( 2^hl or oisopropyl ) ether
bis( 2-Ethylhexyl )phth*late
4-Brooophenyl phenyl ether
Butylbenzyl phthalate
2-Chloron4phthalene
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Chrysene
DibenzoCa ,h)anthracene
1 ,2-fiichlorobenzene
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
Field*
1983
(ppb)
NR
9
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
110
NR
NR
NR
ll.OOC
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
8,000
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
150
NR
NR
NR
1983
(ppb)
NR
ND
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
ND
NR
NR
NR
22,000
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
12,000
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
ND
NR
NR
NR
JRBC
9/26/83
(ppb)
<500*
15,<500g
<500g
KA
<5,000g
<5,000g
<500g
<500g
<500g
NA
<500g
22,000
<500g
<100g
<100g
<100g
-------
GROUND WATER CHARACTERISTICS OF LIPARI LANDFILL SAMPLES
LiPari Landfill stapling
Radian Corp.
Extract able contaminant
Base-neutrals, continued
2,4-Dichlorotoluene
frOilorotoluene
Diethyl phthalate
Dimethyl phthalate
Di-fl-butyl phthalate
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
Di^v-octyl phthalate
1 ,2-Diphenylhydrazine
(as azobenzene)
Ethyleneimine
Fluoroanthene
Fluorene
Hexachlorobenzene
Hexachlorobutadienfe
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachloroethane
ldeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Isophorone
Naphthalene
Nitrobenzene
N-K i t r osod i me t hy 1 ami ne
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
N-Nitrosodiphenylaaine
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
1 ,2 ,4-Tri chlorobenzene
1 t 2-bi s ( 2-Chl oroechoxy )
Field
1983
(ppb)
NR
NR
10
NR
6
NR
NR
NR
NR
KR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
180
70
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
ethane 30-70,000
bis(Chloroaethyl >ether
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodi-
benzo-^-dioxl n
1,4-Diethylene dioxide
NR
NR
NR
• L.bb
1983
(ppb)
NR
NR
<1
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
160
280
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
30-70,000
NR
NR
NR
JKBC
9/26/83
(ppb)
NA
NA
350
<100g
44
<100g
<100g
<100g
OOO8
NA
<100g
<100g
<100g
<200g
<200g
<400g
<250g
<200g
430
<200g
ND
ND
<100g
<100g
OOO8
<200g
140,000
NA
NA
NA
IT CorpC JRBC> CDH.e>*
9-10/84
(ppb)
NA
NA
94
<40
<40
<40
<40
<40
<40
NA
<40
<40
<40
<40
<40
<40
<40
<160
120
<40
<40
<40
<40
<40
<40
<40
NA
<40
<40
NA
12/84-4/85 3/85
(ppb)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
KA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
KA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1,600,000
NA
NA
NA
(??b)
5,018
3,983
<50g
<5Cg
<50g
<50g
<25QI
<5Q?
<50g
<50g
<50g
<50g
<50g
<50g
<50g
<50g
<50g
<50g
<50g
<50g'
<50g
<50g
<50g
5,965
NA
NA
SA
<50g
-------
GROUND WATER CHARACTERISTICS OF LIPARI LANDFILL SAMPLES
LiPari Landfill sampling
Radian Corp.
Pesticide/PCB
contaminant
Aldrin
BHC .alpha
BHC, beta
BHC, delta
BHC.gansa
Chlordane
M'DDE
4,4'DD?
Dieldrin
Endosul fan-alpha
Endosul fan-beta
Endosul fan sulfate
Endrin
Endrin aldehyde
Endrin. ketone
Heptachlor
Heptachlor epoxide
PCB-1242
PCB-1254
PCB-1221
PCB-1232
PCB-1245
PCB-1260
PCB-1016
Toxaphene
MeChoxychlor
Field*
1983
(ppb)
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
• NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Lab°
1983
(ppb)
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
HR
JRBC
9/26/83
(ppb)
<2*
<21
<2
<2*
2.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
2.1
2.1
• ND
2
NAj
2
<25g
<25g
<25g
<2Sg
<25g
<25g
<25g
ND
NA
IT CorpC JRBC'd
9-10/84 12/84-4/85
(ppb) (ppb)
<1 NA
<1 NA
<1 NA
<1 NA
<1 NA
<10 NA
1 NA
<1 NA
<1 NA
<1 NA
<1 NA
<1 NA
<1 NA
<1 NA
<1 NA
NA NA
<1 . NA
<1 NA
<10 NA
<10 NA
<10 NA
<10 NA
<10 NA
<10 NA
<10 NA
<10 NA
<1 NA
a*e'f
3/85
(P?b)
<0.5g
<0.5g
<0.5g
<0.5g
<0.5g
<0.5g
<0.5g
<0.5g
<0.5E
<0.5g
<0.5g
<0.5g
<0.5g
<0.5g
. <0.5?
<0.5£
<0.5F
<0.5g
<0.5g
<1.0g
<0.5g
<0.5g
<0.5g
<1.0g
<0.5g
<0.5g
<0.5g
-------
GROUND WATER CHARACTERISTICS OF L1PARI LANDFILL SAMPLES
Volatile nonpriorlty IT Corpc 9-10/84 Base-neutral extractable XT
pollutant (ppb) nonpriority pollutant
Acetone
620 Aniline
2-Butanone 100,<500 Benzole acid
Carbon dlsulfide ,• <50 Benzyl alcohol
2-Hexanone 23,000 4-Chloroaniline
4-Methyl-2-pentanone 7,700 Wbenzofuran
Styrene 1,100 2-Methylnaphthalene
Vinyl acetate <50 2 -Methyl phenol
o-Xylene 9,200 4-Methylphenol
Total xylenes 3,500 2-, 3-, 4-Nitroani lines
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
GROUND
Metal
contaeitvant
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllius
Cjtdm1\\m
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium'.
Zinc
Cyanide
Phenols
Corpc 9-10/84
•
-------
GROUND WATER CHARACTERISTICS OF LIPARI LANDFILL SAMPLES
Conventional IT
parameter
Dissolved organic carbon
PH
Total suspended solids
Biochemical oxygen demand
Chemical oxygen demand
Aanonia-ni t rogen
Total kjeldahl nitrogen
Phosphorous
Phosphate
Total dissolved solids
Total volatile suspended solids
Volatile dissolved solids
Conductivity
Oil and grease
Total organic carbon
Chlorides
Nitrates
Alkalinity
Hardness as CaCO.
Corpc 9-10/84
(ppm)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
4.8
240
NA
NA
NA
NA
DuPont* 3/85
(ppm)
863
6.3
70
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
CDHe'f 3/85
(ppm)
NA
6.3
532k
1,319
2,820
55.55
57.65
NA
0.37
1,536
164
490
1,900 uoho.'cr
7.7
NA
318.2
0.03
327
188
Laboratory composite of samples from monitoring wells C-lOa, C-6a, and C-4a.
b
Composite of sample drums upon receipt at laboratory.
nighest value (worst case) is indicated.
Limited sampling done by JRB Associates from December 10, 1984, to April 15,
1985. There were four sampling events performed during this period.
Collected from production well PV-1 at conclusion of 24-hour pump test.
Field measurement* performed by Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc., in March of 1985
indicated leachate temperatures ranging from 10 to 16 °centigrade.
"Element is less than value given and not detected by the technique employed.
Report with detection limit.
Due to the high interference levels encountered, an unusually high detection
limit exists. An undeterminable amount of results may be due to
1,2-dichloroethane.
oelow method detection limit. Cvantitation and/or identification may be
uncertain at this level.
Highest value represents the maximum concentration found in shallow driven
wells outside of containment system.
nay be low due to extended holding time of sample.
Notes: NR Not reported; NA Not analyzed; ND Not detected
-------
ATTACHMENT B
SUMMARY TABLES FOR OFF-SITE
LIPARI SAMPLING PROGRAMS
-------
Onsite Soils - Baseline Soil Sampling Results CDM 1987
SEMIVOLATILES
Phenol
b»(2-chloroethyl)eUier
2-Chlorophenol
1 ,.1-Dichlorobcnzene
1 ,4-Dichlorobcnzene
Benzyl Alcohol
1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene
2 Methyl Phenol
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
4 Mclhylphcnol
R-Nilroso-dipropyliminc
laophorone
2,4-Dimcthylphenol
Bcnzoic Acid
2 4 Dichlorophcnol
1 .2,4-Trichlorobcnzcne
Naphthalene
4-Chloroanfline
4-Chloro-3-Mclhlylphenol
2-Mcthylnaphlhalcne
2,4.6-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
Dimethyl Phlhalate
Arena phthlcne
2.4 -Dichlorophcnol
4-Nitro phenol
Dihcnzofuran
2.4-Dinitrotolucne
Diclhyl Phlhalate
Flourene
N-Nitroso-Diphenylamine
Pcnlachloro phenol
Phcnanlhrcne
Anthracene
Di-n-butyl Phlhnlatc
Flouranlhcne
Pyrcne
Butyl benzyl phthalile
Bcnzo(a)Anthraccne
Chryncne
biii(2-cthylhexyl)phlhalate
Di n-ortyl Phlhalate
Bcnto(h)nouranlhcnc
DrnzoftMouranlhonc
nrnjndOpyrrnr
Average
(MB"
10.9.18
12.241
19.5£0
220
1.116
2.994
16.884
498
460
722
72.1
9.276
167
6.209
7.408
918
7.437
2.000
6.000
2.726
370
3.186
687
112
7.408
9.035
260
2.800
866
140
14,886
2,033
677
48
1.734
369
267
1,059
213
169
29,290
1.632
475
475
126
Maximum
kK»
130.000
310.000
36,000
220
2.200
29.000
1.10,000
4.noo
4flO
3.400
"1.460
1.10.000
1.100
19.000
46.000
2.900
6.1.000
2.000
6.000
16.000
310
12.000
1.200
220
46.000
18.000
250
2.800
4.300
220
23.000
4.000
1.400
66
6.800
600
460
7.200
340
360
470.000
5.100
700
700
240
VOLATILES
Acetone
Mclhylcne Chloride
Carhnn Disulfidc
lrnns-1 .2 Oichlnmrthcne
Chloroform
1.2-Dirhlamcthane
2-Bulanonc
1 .1 .1 -Trichloroclhane
1 ,2-Dichloropropnno
Trichloroclhcnr
ficnicne
2-llcxnnone
4 Mrthyl-2 Pentanonc
1 .1 ,2-Trichlorocthanc
Tctrachlororthpnc
Toluene
Chlorohcnzene
Elhylbcnzcnc
Slyrcne
Total Xvlcncs
2-Chloroclhyl Vinyl Ether
Average
6.914
3.500
220
9
94
25.816
75
1.60.1
2
6.840
7.fi57
61
2.577
2
25.695
260.011
1.847
64.408
16!>,H!)7
269.5.14
21.000
Maximum
-------
Chestnut Branch Marsh Soils
(DupofOP-ir
r.p.i ci'ir. r.p.2 cp-a np.4 CPS cp-6 CP-? CPU
VOLATILES
Mclhylcnc Chloride 2J 7J 4* 5.1 6J 4J
Acrlnnc 170 170*
Bcnurnc • 6J
Tolurne ' IJ
Elhyll>cnxcnc H*
srMlVQIATiLES
N NilnModlphi-nyliminc MOB 440* 1200B fiSOB H4nB 1HOOB 1400B H70* 1300B
Din-hutyl plhnlnlc 1100* 150O* 1 800* 2:i(M»» 2HOO* 2200* 1«00» lf.n«'
Hc»rhlornboni«ne 120*
bh(2-Elhylhcnyl)phlhalate Ian* 2HOJ IfiO* ICO* 37ftl 700J 190B 6GOB
Pyrenc IT>al
BCCE MOO 2100 1600 7400
1 -2 Dichlonbrnjcne . 21 at
Naphthalene 260.1
bis(2-Chloroclhoxy)dhanc 7700J 3.100J 2300J 9500J
Phcnanlhcne 2HO.I
Flouranthcne Mial
Pyrrne 400.1
Bcnl!o(a)anth«c«ne 24al
Brnto(b)nouranihcne
4-4 DDE 97 22 HO 140
4-4-DDD ISO GR 610
-------
Chestnut Branch Mnrsh Soils
DUP
(|ig/kR) OP 9 OP 10 CP-10 CPU OP 12 CP-13 OP 14 CPlfi
VOLAT1LES
Mclhylrnr Chloride 4J 27*
Acetone 16*
Chloroform 9
1.2-Dichlomclhnnc 9!)
Tctrarhlorndhrnr 3-1
Toluene 3.1
l.l Dichlororlhnnc 10
Trlchororlhrno 3.1
Irans-l .2-Pirhlororthcnc
Dcnzcne
TnUl XyloncH
r.ii(2-chloroclhyl>ethcT 60J
2-Mcthylnaphlhalcne
N-Nilrosoiwdiphcnylainine 450*
Di-n-hutylphthalate 1300* 10*
bW2 EthylhcxyDphlhaldle 130J 300*
hi»(2-Chlnroclho«yh'thniM> 6BJ
Naphthati-nc BJ
Dl-n-Ortyl Phthalnlc 430*
l.iophoronc
Benioic Acid
Acenaphthnlcnc
Accnaphlhylcnc
Dibenzofumn
Flourrno
Phenanthrenc
Anthracene
Flouranthonc
Pyrcnc
Bcnzo(a)Anthraeene
Chryncnc
Brnzo(h)Flouranlhcnc
BenziXk)Flouranthcne
Brnzo(n)Pyrmc
lilrnod .2,:i-nl)Pyrcnc
Bonzirfg.h.OPrrylono
37'
4!>*
12
72
6
4J
B
7
«3J
B9»
420*
9J
130*
7J
»• . 5» fi»
U» 4* 13
4.1 3.1 14
B
4.1
1J
3.1
3700
34J
30* 93*
B60»
5100J
2J 3J 47J
230* 560* 530*
6.1
I30J
52.1
190J
31J
200J
1500
2.10J
2400
ir.no
H70
1200
I4on
I7UI
HfiO
5.r>0
750
19* 4*
11* 2*
9 3J
2J
1SJ
BO* 22*
fiMOB 120*
19J
240* 120*
2IJ
3HJ
lit
KM
fifiO
r.4J
750
550
320J
400
270J
MJ
2HIU
201X1
240J
-------
Chestnut Branch Marsh Soils
(mK/kg)
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
GP-1
3.1*
20
,
13*
14*
12
73*
GPI6
1.5*
15
11*
8.7*
11
r,6«
GP2
48*
104
24*
20
•144
87
28
L74*
GP-3
14.2
61
23*
12
40
6.4
.
20
136*
GP-4
2.6*
21
6.3*
17*
0.14
7.7
55*
GP-5
10.9*
73
19*
18
96
0.3
26
122'
GP-6 GP-7
7.1* 1.5*
4H
*
12* 8.9*
48 4.3*
0.2
22 5.9
5»« r.:i»
GP-H GP-9 GP-10 GP-1 7
15.2* 1.2* 2.3* 2.4*
114 19
66* 2.6* 3.4* 6.8*
20
256 13.7* 16 23
0.5
16
33 8.1
l.r.4» 56* 54* 5!»*
GP-ll
2.3*
101
9.9*
4.8
6.7»
_
12
!K5*
GPI2
2.4*
I.I
18*
5.2*
27
II5«
GP-13
65.5*
120
96*
74
424
05
16
39
325*
GP-14 GP-IB
3.3*
24
21* 67*
10
80 2.5*
0.13
11
109* 68*
SE Sediments mR/kg
-------
Chestnut Branch Marsh Soils
*
VOLATILES
Mclhylcnc Chloride
Arclonc
Carbon Di«ulfidc
4 Mcthyl-2-Pcntnnonc
Xylene (Tolnl)
Benzene
Chlorobenzene
Elhylbcnzone
I.l-Dichloroclhane
5EMIYOLAT1LES
bisl 2-Elhy Ihcxy Dphthatale
1 ,2-Dichtornbcnzenc
CDM
wen
(0)
24 n
.t:to
.1:1
19
.
3001
19H5
II DUP
(0)
19B
820
• .1.1
180*
wcnti
(2)
.10*
18
40B
1701
WCB«2
(0)
16»
.17
2.1
34 •
2-1
22
ISO)
WCBI2
(2)
42*
87
11
7J
60flB
9
4J
110
3.1
•
1701
410IB
WCBI3
(ID
17*
1.10
24
6.1
B«
IOO
in
220*
WCBI3
(2)
6»
44
6J
6.1
fi'JB
U
20
130*
WCB«4
(0)
22»
1RO
310
94
160
170*
WCBI4 WCBI5
(2) (0>
11* 14»
87 200
n
69
97
110
WCBI5
(2)
.!•
24
Naphthalene
biM2-Chlomclhyloxy)elhane
BCEE
8.U
76» 230J
2.170T 5040T 71WT
850
.1400*
1701
M10T
f.SOO
7930T
INORGANICS
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Iron
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Zinc
16
16
16900
r>5
65
41
14
32900
254
0.28
95
55
12
11100
61
32
52
27
11
20100
ir.4
0.2
71
107
4680
6.1
16
1O9OOO
IH
78
4100
26
.19
10
.14
.11
174000
210
112
256
.1
2970
6.7
26
16
18
18100
241
0..1
49
Ml
9
22
22000
184
0.24
46
98
(0) Sample taken from 0-6 Inchon below mirforc.
(2) Sample lakrn from 18-24 inches below nurfncc.
-------
Lcachate Liquid
SAA
8/79
VOLATILE 1234
Chloromclhn nc
Brnmnmctlinnc
Vinyl Chloride 12 17 64
Chloroolhnnc 5.2
Mclhylcno Chloride 6 57 0.7 12
Acetone
Cnrbon DtMillido
1 .1 -Dichlorwlhcnc 04
I.l-Dichlomrlhanc .1C IRQ 97 6
1 ,2-Dichlororlhcnc 2.4
Chloroform
1,2-Dichlnroclhano
2-Bulnnono
l.l.l-Trichloracthene
Carbon Tclrt" hloride
Vinyl Arclntc
Bromodichloro methane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
ci»-l ,3-Dichloropmp«nc
Trichlarocthcne 2.5
Dibromochlnromclhnne
1 .1 ,2-Trichlorncthnnc
Bcnucnc 1456 2012 IfiOS 171
tnnfl-1 ,3-Trichloroelhnnc
Bromoform
4 -Melhyl-2-Pcnt»none
2-Hcxanone
Tctrachlorelhcne
1,1 ,2.2,-Tclrachlorcthane
Toluene 14400 2^000 15500 1530
Chlornhrnxcnc 4.3 9.5 5.0 1.2
ElhylhenM-nc 706 1100 C.H4 H2
Slyrcnr
Xylcm-s (Totnl)
S&A llnrt
10/79 I!)H2
3 56
58
26 .1.2
2H90 110 28 4.300
4.4
129 6.2
28
1.338 123 43 8.900
23 0.2
1.190 100 9.8 1.200
12.700 622 51 9.200
2.8 0.7 0.1
5HO 62 3.4 1.000
-------
Leachatc Liquid (pg/l)
VOUTILE
TACA
NowHT •
7.1 7.2 23 7.4 ZS 76
Chin ra methane
Brnntomclhnnc
Vinyl Chloride
ChlnrocQinnc
Mrlhylrne Chloride
Ao-lone
Cnrfxjn Dim) fide
1,1-Dichlomrthcnc
1.1-Dichlomclhnnc
1,2-Dirhlornrlhcno
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroclhane
2-BuUnone
I.l.l-Trirhloroethane
Carbon Tclrachtnridc
Vinyl AcrUtc
Bromodichloromelhino
1,2-Dichloropropnnc
cls-1,3-Dichloropropanc
Trichlomrlhcnc
7SO
7400
5IJ
1J
6
1200
920B
H70O 2H
IS
1100
540
6J
ISO
16
60
42
21
Dibromorhloro methane
1.1,2-Trirhloroclhanc
Benzene 4SOJ 1100
lrans-1,3-Triochloroothano
Bromororm
4-Mdhyl-2 Pcntanone 11000 22000 22
2-Hcianonc
Tctrnchlnrodhene
1,1.2.2.-Tctrnchlorocthane
Toluene 650 7600
rhlnrobcnzcnc
Ethylbrnzcnc 4J 1HO
Rlyrcnr
Xylrnr (Total) U 620
20
2J
4.1
610
14
6
51
100
ISO
41
2J
R
16
1.1
-------
Lcachate Liquid (m*/1)
VOLATILE
Chloro methane
Bro mo methane
Vinyl Chloride
Chlorocthane
Mcthylcne Chloride
Acetone
Carton Dtmilflde
1.1-Dichlorocthene
1.1-Dichlorocthane
1 ,2-Dichloroclhcne
Chloroform
1 ,2-Dichlorocthane
2-Butanone
1,1.1-Trichloroethane
TACA
JunBB
Zl 22 23 24 ZS Z6 27
4J 19
32
600 B 4600R .'IOOB
15000 17000 ;i|00 24 B 20B
3:U
*
5200
.
TACA
A»Rl»H6
Zl 7.2 Z.I 7.4
1267*
I292fl«
656
822»
16.3
336T.* 741*
O'KMi* 524* 2095*
6J
137*
137*
72*
1525* 12.4J
20Hfi* 46.3 503
TACA
SrpHG
7.5 Z6 Zl Z2 23
15.4J
300J 2200
21000 14000
18
IJ
3.6J
3.IJ
2J
6.4
3500*
24 26
24 6
200
1300
25 4J
2
2J
26
7
M
12
&l
6J
Cirbon Tetrmchloride
Vinyl Acrtale
Bromodichloromclhane
1,2-Dichloropnipane
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
Trichlorocthene
100J
300J
Dibromochlromclhane
1.1.2-Trichloroclhane
Benzene 200J
lrans-1 ,3-Triochloroethane
Bromofbrm
4 Methyl-2 Pentanone 12000
2-llciinone
Tclr«chlororthene
1 .1 ,2.2.-Tctrachloroelh«ne
Toluene BfiO
Chlorobcnzcne
Elhylbcnzcnc
Slyrenc
Xylcncn (Total) 200
1000
18000
6.1
4ROO
6
600
3900
6700
H900
8
900
3800
80 190
17B
36 9
130
240 6
IOOJ
8fil7
434
2.H.I
8.9
1110»
24319*
7275»
194*
704*
3.2J
5.2J
30.5
118
2789
4330
42fit
CM
624
1528
273
67.3
71. H
117
192 200J
20000
400J
41
19 50J
4.5J 60J
800
4600
200
700
2500
300
24
3200
600
1400
8
17
4J
-------
Leachatc Liquid
S&A . S&A Hart
9-AHR-79 22-Aug-79 ' 10Oct79 1'IHl
SEMIUDLATILE 1 23123 4 .1 6 6
Phenol 2.400 6.900 490
bi»(2-chloroethyl)cthor . 44.000 38.000 76.000 1.10.000 210.OOO 64.000 2.10.000 29.000 14,000 52.000
2-Chloro phenol
1.3-Dichlorohcnxenr
1,4-Dirhlorobcntcnp
Benzyl Alcohol
1,2-Dichlorobensene
2 Methyl Phenol
bls<2-3-Mclhylphcnol
2-Mcthylnaphthalcne
HexachlorocyclopenUdiene
2,4,6-Trichfcrophcnol
2,4,6-Trichlorophcnol .
2-Chloronaphthalenc
2-Nltroanallne _..' ._ _
Dimethyl Phthalate
Acenaphlhylene
3-Nltroanaline
-------
Leachate Liquid (MB/0
SEMIVOLATILE
Phenol
bi»(2-chloroclhyl)ether
TAGA
TAGA
June 1986 Au«usl
Zt
4400
Z2 Z3
3200
Z4 7.S Z6 7.1
I631J
4500 3400 4000 IIHH.'I*
1986
7.2 7.3
9468*
27H.r.2* 132*
7.4 7.5
314*
11471* 9847*
Z6
12.1
9.-IG4*
TAOA
Sop-H6
7.1
1500
AOOO
7.2 Z3
8600
12000
Z4 Z5 U
1500 490 300
2-Chkrophcnol
1,3-DichloroDcnzene
1,4-Dichlorobcnicnc
Bcntyl Alcohol 120J
1.2Dichlorobeniene 42* 2.9J 3.KJ 8 18J
2 Methyl Phenol •
bi>(2-chk>roiRopropyl)ethcr
4-Mcthylphcnol 360 '_ _ . , ._. .. 1100
N-Nilroso-Di-n-PropylBminc .
Hexarhloroclhine . .
Nitrobcnxene
Imphorone 160J 13.RJ HOJ HO 18 4J
2-Nilrophenol
2.4-Dimethylphenol
BenukAcid •
bis(2-chloroelhoiy)ethane 3390J MBOJ 26000J 38800.1 77.1
2-4-Dichlorophcnol
1,2,4-Trichlorobcniene ' _ __
FJiphlh.lene 340 50'» " "" "T60 HTBT
4-Chloroiniline .
HexachlorobuUdlene
4-Chlora-3-Mcthlylphenol
2 Methyln«plh«lene
IIex«chlonicyclopentadicne
2.4,6-Trichlorophcnol
2.4,6-Trichlorophcnol • ~" --..._
2-ChloroMphthclcne
2:Nilro*n*line . . .„ _.
Dimethyl Phlhalatc
Accnaphlhylrne
3-Ni!ronnilinc
-------
Lcachate Liquid (MB/1)
TAOA
November |987
SEMIVOLAT1LE
Phcn«»l
bisia^hloroethyDclher
7.1
ir.no
moo
72
2fiOO
5.SOO
23
B40
2200
Z4
29J
. ftfOO
ZS
5100
Z6
4J
fi6
2-Chlnro phenol
1 .n-Diehlnronrnxene
1.4 • Dichlorobcnzcne
Benzyl Alcohol :U 6.1
1.2-Dirhlomhcnzcne I Hal 3J
2 Mrlhyl Phenol 3.1 . 8ft
bis(2-Chloroi*)propyl)elhcr
4:Mrthylphcnnl 130 370 2fiO _..«.!...
N-NilnMo-Di-n-Propyl«mine
Hcxachloroclhinc
Nitrnbcnxcnc
Inophonme 190 ISO I9J 5J
2-Nitro phenol
2.4 Dimrthylphcnol 8J
BrnzoicAcid 2000 11000 7RO
bls(2-chlnrocthoxy)cthane
2-4-Dichloniphcnol
1.2.4ITrichk>rnnrnr.onc
Nnphlhfilcnc \U "soj 4200 2S
4-('hloronniline 670 7J
Hmachlorohutadlcne
4 -Chloro-3-Mclhylphcnol
2 Mrthylnnphlhalcnc 420J
flrxnchlnrocyclopcnUdlene
2.4.6-Trichlorophcnol
2.4,5-Trichlorophenol
2-Chk>n>naphthalcnc
2-Nilroanalinc _
Dimethyl Phlhnlalc
Arcnnphlhylcnc
3-Nitroannlinc
-------
T \nchato Liquid
(MK/I)
S & A s * A TACA
n/79 22-AUR-79 J«/IO/7«I June 19W5
SEMIVOLATILE 12 3 I 2 3 4 :i 5 fi Zl 7.2 Z.1 Z4 ZS Z8
Accnaphthcnc -
2.4-Dinilrophcnol . *
4-Nitrophcnol
DibcnzoCuran
2.4-Dinilrololucne •
2,6-Dinilrololucnc
Dicthylphthlnlc ' . . 2H 95
4-Chlon>phcnyl-phenylclher ' .
Plourcne
4-Nitroanlllne _ _ _____ ...... ______ _.__._ ________
4.6 Bimlro-2-McthylphenoI "" " ..... ....... "" ~ ;' " ......... "
N-Nitnnodiphcnylamine
4-Brontophcnyl-phcnylclher '
Hcxachlorobcnzcne
PcnUchlorophcnol
Ricnanthrcnc
Anthracene
Di-n butyl phthaUle 9.5 10 ' OR 0.8
Flouranthene 0.7 0.6
Pyrene ___ __ __________________ ____ _____________ . . . .. "•" ____ °-fi .„ _____ .. _____ ._.. _____ :.:_ ......... ________
Butylbcniylphthalale
3.3'-Dichlorobcnzcne
Bcnto(a)Anlhricene
bM2-Ethylhcxyl)phthaUte 97 II lOfi 14
Chryscne
Di-n-octyl PhthaUte 6
Bcnzo(b)F1ouranlhcne
Bcnzo
-------
Lcachate Liquid (ME/I)
TAGA
• AiiffM ' NovflT
' _ 7.1 Z2 23 Z4 7.5 . ZC. 71 Z2 73 Z4 ZS Zfi
Accnaphtheite
2.4-Dinitrophcnol
4-Nilrophcnol
Dibenzofuran
2.4-Dinitrotohiene
2.6-Dinilrololuem
DiethylphthiilflU
4-Chlorophcnyl-phrnylcthor
Flourcne '
4.6 Dinilro-2 Methylphcnol
N-NitnMiodiphenylamifie
4-Bromophcnyl-phrnylclher
Hexachlorobcnxcne
Pcnlachlorophenol
Phcninlhrenc
Antheacne
Di-n-bulyl pthalate 60.1 8J
Flouranlhcnc
Pyrene ____ ..... _ ........ __ _ _______ ............... .. „. ....... .
BulylbcnxylphUlntc
3,3'-Dichlprnbcnzenc
Bcnxo(«)Anlhr«ccne
bis(2-Elhylhcxyl)phlh«Ule 320J 1.10J
Chrysene .
Di-n-octyl FtilhaUte
Bento(b)Flounnthcne
B«nzo
-------
Lcachate Liquid
SAA
9 AuK 197!)
1 2 3
Arsenic
Bnrium
Beryllium
Cndmium
Chromium
Copper
Lend
Mercury
Nickel
Selcnlum_
SiNer
Thnllium
Vanadium
Zinc
SAA
•a Aug
1
R)
40J
110
.10
9fi
2
2ai
2J
S3
1:10
1:10
r>40
40.1
400
3
19
n
.10J
110
100)
20J
257
4
27
6J
SOJ
95
2f.O
IRO
SAA
10 Oil 79
3 5
10
120 .10
fiO HO
6
40
6
•
20
46
MHO
6
4H
-------
Leach ate Liquid
Ancnlc
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Vunndhim
Zinc
TAGA
Jun-86
Zl
106
302
159J
1670J
1920J
12000
1.5
257J
2070
6690J
Z2
228
30J •
9IJ
710J
491J
1890
0.5
68J
1110
1160
Z.1 Z4
67
13J
157J
7RfiJ
.1055
1140
0.7
477J
H1J
10.101
Z5
29
15J
2I9J
806.1
976
0.3
.
82RI
76
10J
292.1
R70J
.182
0.4
755.1
TAGA
AiiR-86
Zl
26
1.1
16
77*
456
438J
114
326
Z2 Z.I
10.3 .
4
29
138*
9U8
45
246
lira;
74
5
77
191*
70.1
12.1
3.VI*
75
14*
32
423
1205»
S8H9
1250
896
3JI40*
Tfi
27
364
1167*
2350
99
380
irino*
TAOA
Scp-8fi
Zt
100
97
1350
11.10
9040
1.2*
400
1370
4.100
Z2 7.3
90*
50
700
580
2460
200
1180
2570
7.4 Z5 26
14 60
680 90
270 3920 218
1110
310 1490 310
1070 4010 240
-------
Lcacbate Liquid (pg/l)
TAC.A
November I9R7
Zl 7.2
Arsenic
Bnrium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lend
Mrrrury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thnllium
Vnnndium
Zinc
23»
«2»
1060*
»23»
6270
3.0*
291
947*
4900*
.19
364*
7:10*
6SS»
. 3970
l.7«
I2f,
1610*
2160*
Z.1
1.1
a»
53*
HH»
:IHH
1.5*
31
BB«
3H4*
74
16
13fi«
110*
225*
1510
O.H»
4H
1970*
IOH5*
Z5
37
412*
22S»
:IHO»
2:ino
!.«•
104
.IfifiO*
2r.io»
76
17
432*
126*
193*
1410
1.7*
74
2716*
IOSO»
-------
Chestnut Branch Stream
VOLATILE
S & A 9/79
Wntcr (|iR/l)
I 2
RndianlOH2
CUM I08S
SWI SWfi SW3 SW4 SRI SE6 SE.1 SE4
Ch to ID methane
Bro mo methane
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroclhanc
Mclhylcnc Chloride
Acetone
Carbon Diiutflde
1,1-Dichlorocthcne
1,1-Dichlorocthane
lj2J)ichlqroclhcne
Chloroform
1,2-Dichloroclhane
2-Butanone
l.l.l-Trichlorocthane
Carbon Tclrachloride
Vinyl Acetate
Bromodichloromclhane
1,2-Dichloropropane
cia-1,3-Dkhloropropane
Trichlorocthcne
Dibromochlro methane
1.1,2-Trichloroclhanc
Benzene
tranB-l,3-Trlochlorocthanc
Bromororm
4 -Mcthyl-2-Pentanone
2-Hexanone
Tctrachtrocthene
1,1,2.2.-TertrachlroeOt«ne
Toluene
M
2» 2* fi20B
21 • 10* 72B
490B
HID 120
17* 19*
10
1.3J
0.8
KJ
a.al
9.7B
5.1
ChlorobenteM
Elhylbentene
Slyrene
Xylenca (Total)
SW Surface Water ug/l
SE Sediment
-------
Chestnut Branch Stream
VOLATILE*
EPA/ERT .1WH
SI
SW SB
S2 S3 S4 S9 SIO
SW SE SW SE SW SE SW SE SW
SE
SI I
SW
SE
Chloro methane
Dromo methane
Vinyl Chloride
Chtoroclhane
Mcthylcne Chloride 12
Acetone
Carbon Dlsulflde
1.1 -Dichlorocthcne
1,1 -Dichloroclhane
1,2-Dichloroethcne
2-BuUnone
t .1.1 -Triochloroethene
Carbon Tctrachloridc
Vinyl Acetate
Bromodichloroinethane
1,2-Dichloropropane
cit-1,3-Dichloropropane
Trichloroethene
Bromochloromcthane
hli^-Trichloroclhanc
Benzene
lrans-1,3-Trichloroethane
Bromolorm
4-Methyl-2-PcnUnone
2-Hexanone
Tclrachloroethene
1,1,2.2.-Tctrachloracthane
Toluene 2J
OilorotMftMM •
Ethylbeniene _
Slyrene
Xylenca (Total)
BJ
16B 13 1.1
4.1B
12
16
30B
37B
160J
4RJ
SW Surface water PR/I
SE Sediments
-------
Chestnut Branch Stream
SEMWOLAT1LE
S & A !V7!l
Surface
I 2
SW1
SW2
Hn nn IHH2
SW SR
CUM IOH5
SW| SW5
SW.1
SW4 SRI
SE5
SR.l
SE4
Phenol
bis(2-chk>roclhyl)clhcr
2-Chloro phenol
1,3-Dichlorobcntcne
1.4 -Dichlorobcnzcnc
Bcntyl Alcohol
1,2-Dichlorobcntcne
2 Methyl Phenol
bis(2-Chloroiaopropyl)cthcr
4 Mcihylphcnol
N-Nilroso-Di-n-Propylnmioc
HciBchlorocthnnc
Nitrobenxcnc
Isophorane
2-Nilrophenol
2,4-Dimdhylphcnol
Benzole Acid
bi«(2-Chlon>elhray)clhane
2-4-Dichlorophcnol
f,2,4 -Trichlrooc n zcne
Naphthalene
4-Choroiniline
HciBchlornbutilcne
4-Chlon-3-Mclhlylphcnol
2-Mcthylnipthalcnc
Ilci ach lorocyclopcnladiene
2.4,6-Trichlo ro phenol
2.4.6-Trichlorophenol
2-Chloroo»p*h>lcne
2-Nilron«n«llne
Dimethyl Phthclate
Acenaphlhylcne
.1-Nitroin«llne
2fiO
280
6H
890
20J II
201
14 17
122J 4601
21J
14J
211
SW Surface Witter jig/1
SR Srdimrnt
-------
Chestnut Branch Stream
EPA/ERT .VBH
81 S2 S3 S4 S3 S10 SI I
SEMIVOLATILE SW SE SW SB SW SB SW SB SW RE SW RE RW SB
«
Phenol
bis(2
-------
Chestnut Branch Stream
•
SEMIVOLATILE
Accnapll
ftene
SAASW9
Wnlrr
-------
Chestnut Branch Stream
SEMTVOLAT1LE
ERT/EPA Mnrrh 1988
SI • S2
SW SE SW
S.1
SW
SE
S4
SW
S9
SW
SE
SIO
SW
SE
SI I
SW
SE
Aeeimpthene
2.4-Dinitro phenol
2.4-Nilrophcnol
DibcnzoCuran
2.4-DinUrolohiene
2.6-Dinitrololucnc
Dicthylphlhalatc
4 -Chlorophcnyl-phenylcthcr
Flourene
4JNitro»njllnc
4,6 Dinilro-2 Mcthylphcnol
N-Nitnnodiphcnylamino
4-Bromophrnyl-phcnylclher
Hcxachlorobcntcnc
PenUchlorophcnol
Phenanthrcne
Anthracene
Di-n-bulyl phthalale
Flouranthcne
Pvrcne
Bulylbentylphlhalnte
3,3'-Dich1orohcnicnc
Bcnto(i)Anthrnrcne
biM2-E(hylhcxyl)phthiUte 94B
Chryscne
Di-n-octyl Hithalale
Bcnto(b)nouninlhcne
Bennfli Hloonnthene
Bcnto(a)PyTcne
lndcno
-------
Chestnut Branch Stream
S& A 9/79
Wnlcr ((MR") Sediment (mg/kg)
1212
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thulium
Vonodium
Zinc
1.5
• 0.8
33 4.7
14 13 1.0
11
0.2
6J 8
0.7
0.5
3.0
1.7
11
0.3
U
1.8
12
Fred C. llnrt
SW
84
0.3
5.0
2.5
26
10
10
22
(Indian |9H2
SW SE
l.noo
12
3.300
:i,fioo
1.400
2.700
I9.000
COM 19R5
(UK")
SWI SW5
17*
14
2.3
55*
SW3
5.6
13
13
--6V
5.6
21
SW4
4.3*
2.8
16
12
6»
4.4
15*
SE1
6
3.4
II
2.4
10
SE5
3
8
5.3
3
18
33
SE3
44
2
14
119
34»
0.15
11
13
436
SE4
11
2.5
84
820
1.4
76
-------
Chestnut Branch Stream
ERT/EPAMnrrh 19H8
SI S2
SW SE SW
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thalium
Vanadium
Zinc
HHI
2.1
2.H
6.1
1.88
61
•>
.98
2.7B
4
.(in
O.HR
7.1
SE
.58
.088
4.6
4.1
25
1.2B
17
S3
SW
952
110
2.:iB
.KB
20
SE
.SB
.IB
7.3
5.1
20
I.5B
22
S4
SW
811
1IB
2.2B
7.4 B
22
'SE
.74 B
.168
5..1
5.6
1H
2.1 B
22
S9
SW
1470
7.4B
14
5.4B
21
SE
1.14
.118
4.3
5.3
96
298
2R
SIO
SW SE
.41 B
.128
44
60
r.2
3.2B
.16
Sll
SW
875
6.1 B
7.1
1.1
SE
.088
2.3
2.0
9..1
1.5B
12
SW Surface water Jig/1
SE Sediments. mg/kg
-------
Rnbbit Run SW & SE
VOLATILE
S A Aft/79
Wnlrr <(IR/I)
1 2
Hart 1981
Wnlrr
RnHinn 1982
Wnlrr
"
COM 1985
SW6 SK6
SW7 SE7 SW8 SER
Chloro methane
Bro mo methane
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroclhane
Mclhylrne Chloride
Acetone
Carbon Disulfldc
I.l-Dichlorocthone
l.l-Dichloroclh*no
1.7
2.0
9fl
8.5
fi«» 8J 5J 40*
.14* HOB 22 II* C>H*
1.9
_^ ____
Chloroform
1.2Chloroclhane
2-Butanone
1 .1 .1 -Trichloroethcne
Carbon TelnchlPhde
Vinyl Acetate
Bromodichloro methane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1 ,3-Dkhloroprnpane
Trichoroethcne __
f)if>romochloro methane
1 ,1 ,2-TrichlorocthanC
Benzene
lrana-1 ,3-Trichlorocthiine
Bromoform
4-Mcthyl-2-Pentanone
2-Hcxanone
Tcrtrachlrocthene
1,1 ,2.2,-Tclrachloroothane
Toluene ___ ; ___
Chktrobeniene
Ethylbcnzcnc
Stymie
Xylenta (Total) ' _
19*
38*
2.9J
2.IJ
.1.1
1.2*
2.6*
644
12
1.0*
35*
26
5J
SW Surface Water MK/1
SE Sediment
-------
Rabbit Run
S&AHT79 Hart Ritdnin COM 1985
Witter (|1K/I> I9HI 1!IH2
SEMIVOI.ATILE 1 2 Wnlrr Wnlrr SWfi SE6 SW7 SF.7 SW8 SRH
Phenol 2HO 72
bis<2-ch1orocthyl)elhcr * 2.100 l.'IOOO 4.r>00 10.1
R7 31 250.1
2-Chloroph«>nol
1 ,.l-Dichlan>l»rnzcnc
I ,4-DichlnnibMUtono
Benzyl Alonhol
1,2-Dichlarabcntcne
2-Mclhyl Phonal
hix(2-chk>n>i!H>prapyl)cthcr
4-Mcthylphcnol
N-Nilrono.bi-n-Prnpytnmlne
Hcxachlorocthnne
Nitrobcntrne
Iwiphoronc
2-Nitrophcnol
2.4-Dimcthylphcnol
Bcnzoic Acid
bis(2-Chlonx!lho«y)cthanc
2-4-Dichlomphenol
|l2141Trlchlorobcni'.cnc
NnphlhiJrno
4-Chloro«nlline
Hcxochlorobutadiene
4-chloro-3-Mclhylphcnol
2-Mcthylnaphthalcnc
Hciachlorocyclopcnladicne
2,4,6-Trich lorophcnol
2,4.6-Trichloro phenol
2-ChloronRphlhalcnc
2-NilrpanHlinc
Dimethyl Phlhnlnlc
Arcnnphlhylcnc
3-Nilmnnnlinc
3BO«
140
19J
I6J
200*
1RI
19
11
280
-------
Rabbit Run
8 A A H/ 79
Water (MR/))
1 2
Hart 1981
Rudiin 19H2
W.tor
COM
SW6 SE6 SW7 SET SW8 SEfl
Aceniphthene
2.4-Dlnitrophcnol
2.4-Nilrophcnol
Dibenzofuren
2.4-Dinitrotoluene
2.6-Dinilro toluene
DiclhylphlhaUtc 1.4
4-Chlorophenyl-phenyldher
Flourene
4-Nitroinillne
1.0
77B
3HJ
4.6-Diniln>.2-Melhylphenol
N-NilnModiphcnyUmine
4-Bromophcnyl-phcnylclher
Hciachlorobcnxcnc
Pcntachlorophcnol
Phenanthrcnc
Anthracene
Di-n-butyl phthalnle 0.6
Flouranthcnc
Py.rene ___
BulylbenzylphlhcUle
3,3'-Dichlorobensene
Benzo(*)Anthr*crne
bi8(2-Elhylhe«yl)phth»l.te 3.6
Chryicne
Di-noctyl PTithaliU
Benn(b)noaranUieM
BensoflOFtourBnthene
1.6
1.2
260J
fiHJ
110J 10*
490
620
1601
2.900B
2.ial
267.1
H9J
20*
65*
Indcnpcnio?i,f>)Anlt>racone
Bcnzo((|.h.l)Prrylcnc
3.700*
4.600
-------
Rabbit Run
Amcntc
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
S& Aft/79
Water (MR/I)
1 2
10J
BJ 4J
110
23 2.1
20J
22 10J
Hart 1981 Radian 1982
Water Wnler
10
06
13
7
3
40 4
9
12
19
113
COM
SW6
2
6.7
14
25
82J
16
11
90
1985
SE6
12
6.5
.13J
7.3
36
SW7
4.2
6.8
6.5
12J
11 .
49
SE7 SW8 SER
3.6
2
3.9 4.2
8.7 1 .5
2.4 2HJ :i8
0.1 0.12
1.7 7.4 3.0
10 37 :i:i
SW Surface Water jig/1
SE Sediment*
-------
Alcyon Lake Surface Water
(MB/I)
S & A Rnrfinn 1 982 COM 1 f>R5
Surface Water
VOLATILE 1 2 .1 4
SW10
TAGA19H6/87 EPA/ERT 3/88
SW1 SW2 SW.1 SW4 IJl L6 L8 L9
Chloro methane
Bromontclhanc
Vinyl Chloride
Chlororthanc
Mclhylcnc Chloride
Acetone
Carbon Disulfide
1.1-Dichlorocthcne
1.1-Dichlorocthanc
1.2-Dichlorpclhcnc
Chloroform
1,2-Dichlorocthane
2-BuUnone
l.U-Trichloroethane
Carbon Telrachloride
Vinyl Acetate
Bromodichloro methane
1,2-Dichloropropane
cis-1,3-Dkhloropropane
IricbJuvclhcjie
HI
2100 1000
aoOB 300B
1HOOO 4IHK)
18B 6B
Dibromochloro methane
1,1,2-Trichloroclhnnc
Benzene
trana-1,3-Trichlorocthane
Bromoform
4 -M cthyl-2-IVnUnone
2-lleianone
Tctrachlrocthcne
1.1.2,2,-Tertrachloroelhane
Toluene ^_
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbcnzcnc
Slyrcne
Xylcne (Total)
20 IOOJ
64* 4R 11000 5900
0.9
600
6
JOO
900 1J
3B
-------
Alcyon Lake Surface Water
SEMIVOLATILE
1
S&A1979
Surface Water
2 .1
llnrt 1981
Rndinn I9H2
COM I !)H5 TAGA/ERT 198K/H7
SWIO RW1 RW2 SW3 SW4
EPA/KRT 3/8H
M L7 Lfl
Phenol
bis(2-chlorocthyl)elher
2-Chloro phenol
1,3-Dichlorobcnzene
1,4-Dichlorobcnzcnc
Benzyl Alcohol
1,2-DlchloroDcnzene
2 Methyl Phenol
bi»(2-Chloroiaopropyl)elhcr
4-Mcthylphcnol
N-Nilroso-TSf-n-Ptopylamine
Hcxachloroclhane
Nitrobenzene
Imphorone
2-Nitrophcnol
2.4-Dimcthylphcnol
Bcnzoic Acid
biM2-chloroclhoxy)ethane
2-4-Dichlorophenol
1,2,4-Trichlrobcnzene
Naphthalene
4-Chloroanilinr
Hexachlorobutadiene
4-Chloro-3-Mclhlylphenol
2-Mcthylnapthalcne
llcxachlorocyclopentadiene
2.4.6-Trichlorophcnol
2.4,5-Trichlorophcnol
2-Chloronaphtnatcne
270
330
240
7RO
280
1.0
70
.3.1
II
14
930J 6.4J
19.1
14J
73
Dimethyl Phlhalate
Accnaphlhylcne
3-Nitrnnnalinc
-------
Alcyon Lake Surface Water
K&A1979 HART Rn«lina TAfJA/EPA EPA/ERT
* I 2 3 4 1981 I W SWI SW2 SW.1 SW4 I.S L5 \£ L7 L8 L8
SEMIVOLATILE
Aceniplhene
2.4-Dinitrophcnol
4-Nitrophenol
Dibenzofiiran
2.4-Dinitrotohiene
2.6-Dinilrotoluenc
Dicthylphthkte
4-Chtorophcnyl-phenylolhrr
Flourcne
4-NUnmnHlne ____ ________ __ _ __ _ ___ __ __ ______ ___ __
4,6-Dinilro 2-Methylphcnol ----- .. ............ .-
N-NitrosodiphcnyUminc
4-Bromophcnyl-phenylclhcr
HexBchlorobenzcne
PenUdilorophcnol
Pheninthrcnc
Anthrcccne
Di-n-butyl phlhilate O.R 1.0 1.4 1.1 60 O..M
Flouranlhenc
Pyrcne __________ _ _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ _ ___ _ __ _ ____
Butylbenxylphthslilc ~" .....
3.3'-Dichlorobcnzcne
Bcnzo(*)Anthraccne
bia(2-EUiylhexyl)phthaUte 0.5 0.6 1.6 5.5 170 120B MOB
Chryvene
Di-n-octyl phthakte
Benzo(b)Flour*nthene
Bentodiinouranthene
Bcnto
-------
Alcyon Lake Surface Water
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cndmium
Chromium
Copper
Lend
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thalium
Vanndium
Zinc
S & A 1979 Marl
I'lHl
1 2 .1 4
3J
78
0.1
13 13 12 1.1
33
10.1
R
5.0J 5
34 10J 49
Rnriinn
IOH2
9
17
10AI
21
3
C:DM 19H5 TAC.A/ERT
RR/H7
SWlfl SW| SW2
1.4
6.7
r>.o
17
02
17
7.6J
1.5J
34*
234*
0.3.1
14«
31 •
2fl»
21 •
0.3J
13*
46»
SW3
6.9*
19*
125
0.1J
14J
26J
SW4
12
0.2J
14J
15
EPA/ERT .VH8
LS L6
932
9.0B
102
7.4
0.9B
19.S
L7 Lfl
2190
6.9B
8.7
6.1 B
15
-------
Alcyon Lake Sediments
Radian 1982 COM 15)85 COM 1986 EPA/ERT .VH8
VOLATILE
Bl B2 B.1 B4 US L5 U L7 L8 L8
Shallow Drop Shallow Deep Shallow Docp Shnllow Deep SEI9 SE20 SE21 Shallow I>«-cp Shallow Deep
Chloromcihane
Bromomcthane
Vinyl Chloride
Chloroethane
Mclhylene Chloride
Acetone
Carbon Dtoulfato
1.1 -DichloroeOiene
1.1-Dichloroclhane
1,2.nift»lnrnglhpng
Chloroform
1.2-Dichloroelhane
2-BuUnone
1.1.1-Trichloroelhane
Carbon Telrachloride
Vinyl Acetate
Brornodidiloro methane
1,2-DichlorDpropane
eis-1,3-Dkhloropropene
120
2KB
40H
1700B 2HOOB 100B
nooR 6Hoo* 1.10
2908
I HOC
11J
I20B
:un
27B
I7R
an*
inooo*
Bromochlorotnelhtne
1.1,2-Trichlbrocthane
Benzene '
lrant-1,3-Trichloroethane
Bromororm
4-Mcthyl-2-Pcntanone
2-Hczanone
Tctrachlroclhene
1,1.2.2,-Terlrachlroethene
Tolucoe
20
11J
BOOB
._ 40B _____ 11B
14B
60B _
Chlorobenzene
Ethylbcnzcne
Styrcne
Xylcno (Total)
-------
Alcyon Lake Sediments
(MR/kR)
COM 1985 EPA/ERT MARCH 19H8
Dl B2 n.l • R4 L5 LS L6 L7 L8 Lfl
Shllw Deep Shllw Deep Shllw Deep Shllw Deep Khllw Deep Shllw Deep
Phenol
bis(2-chlorocthyl)cthcr 400 64 42
2-Chloro phenol
1.3-DlchlorobciMcne
l,4-Dichlorobcn*enc
Benzyl Alcohol
1,2-Dichlorobcnxeno
2-Mclhyl Phenol • S40*
bis(2-Ch1oroiw>propyl)clhcr
<-Mcthylphcnol 1200
N-Nilroso-Di-n-Propyldminc
Hcxachloroclh*nc
Nitrobenzene
Imphorone
2-Nitro phenol
2.4-Dimcthylphenol
Bcnioie Acid
bi.i(2-Chlorocth phenol
2-Chloronaphthiilcnc
2-Nltronanallne _ _
Dimethyl Phlhalnte
Acenaphthylcnc •
3-Nitronnalinc
-------
Alcyon Lake Sediments
S&A1979
1 2
ScmivoMlle
Accnapthcne
2.4-Dinitrophenol
4-Nitrophcnol
Dibensofuren
2.4-Dinitrotoluene
2.6-Dlnltrolohiene
Diclhylphthlate
4 •Chrlophenyl-phenylelhcr
Flourene
4-Nilroanlllne
4.0
3
29
4
28
Hart
19H1
COM 1985
ni
Shllw Deep
82
Shllw
Drop
B3
Shllw
Deep
•
84
Sllw
Deep
19
20
21
RPA/ERT
IA L5
S D
49
30
57
L6
no
L7 LB L8
S D
4 ,6-Dinitro-2 Methylphenol
N-Nitrosodlphenylamlne
4 -Bromophcnyl-phcny Iclher
llcxachlorbcnicne
Pcntichloro phenol
Phcnanthrene 32
Anlhrcacene 32
Dl-n-butyl plhalate
Flouranthene 22
Pyrene 16
Butylbcniylphtalate
3,3'-Dichlorobcnzene
Bcnio(a)Anthraccne
bia(2-Elhylhcxyl)phthalate
Chryacne
Di-n-octyl Phthalato 92
Bcnzo(b)Flouranlhcne
Bcnto(k)Flouranlhcne
Bcnto(a)Pyi«ne
1 ndcnod ,2,3-cd)Pyrei>e
Dihrnzo(a,h)Anlhraccne
Bonio(g.h.i)Pcrylcne
200
200
160
140
34 44
16
260
64
64
140
110
70
70
67
60
240
64
360
360
220
170
46
220
300
120
120
300
23
220
460
460
460
500
1.200
1.000
1.200
480
4HO
420
770J
1600
1500
840J
71 OJ
1100J
1800
1800
800.1
1800
2400
4400
1600
7500
1700
2200
2200
21)00
2300
1700
770J
6700
1200
2500
IfiOO
990J
. 280J
4,'IOJ
57M
1800
4.ml
1000
1000
1500
2400
2200
10000
5.100
1500
2600
2ROO
1200
300J
460
.140*
770
415*
360J
:IBOJ
670
870
960
410J
1600
1400*
1400*
390*
460
640*
400*
290J
1400*
370J
950*
480*
250J
250.1
1300
1400
1400
1500
720
770
680J
650
620
600
230J
:ir,oJ
46ai
260J
aooJ
780
1200
850
1900
650J
3MOB
820
490J
140
190
320
61
850
560
290
4:<0
350
9308
260
280
30
37
76
10J
170
no
47
210
70
4508
80
40
140
480
780
92
1700
1200
.
690
2200
890
3508
450
600
230
340
660 300
1200 800
970 690
420 290
2700 2300
680 490
8908
820 310
440 410
-------
Alcyon Lake Sediments
(rtiR/kg)
S & A 1979
Water
1 2
Arsenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium
Capper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thnlium
Vanndium
Zinc
0.3
7.9
4.2
160
1.0
4.5
16
0.9
8.6
2.8
67
0.2
2J
15
3
22»
1.3
2.3
70
120
H2
0.4
2J
0.5
310
Hart
1981
4
0.9
0.7
3.9
1.6
14
0.1
17
1.3
1.6
5.5
12
1.3
6.9
110
Radian CDM1985
1982 HI
Shllw Deep
4.0
1.7
1.1
1.5
9.6
6.1
4.8
6.1
75
ID
Dl
1.12
r.«»7
1.1.
fin
75
R22
149
3T.O
0.7
98
6.5
60
402
B2
Shllw
24
46
460
1.1
17
425
Dorp
3.5 '
31
14*
48
0.08
10
9
68
B3
Shllw
2.3
39
41
343*
0.5
17
29
281
Dcrp
4.7
0.4
6.1
17
16
46
14
12
52
B4
Shllw
29
31
167*
0.33
18
210
Deep
4.1
0.7
2.9
38
24
54
0.29
14
10
86
CDM 1986
SE19 SR20
23
18
57
6.3
9
4J
8
80»
19
18
142
n.3
11
4.2J
11
98J
SE21
234
149
0.5
123
4.4J
23
264.1
EPA/ERT 1988
L5 L5 L6
Shllw Deep
.7B
66
5.5
:m
2.9B
0.2
45
.36
4,1
4.8
21
3.1 B
,1B
33
5.2
2.0
26
41
304
0.17
20
.46
297
L7
6.1
2.5
40
%5
385
26
1.4
316
L8
Shllw
8.7
2.0B
65
77
562
33
386
L8
Deep
21
4.2
925
434
451
369
546
-------
SUMMARY OF AIR SAMPLING PROGRAMS*
COMPOUND NJIT HART* NJDEP
1979 1980
LEA LEA
ACETONE
BENZENE DC
BCEE
C3ALKYL BENZENE
Cg^LKANE
C7ALKANE
CgALKANE
CHLOROFORM
CHLOROETHAN'E
1,1-DCA
t-DCA . '
1,1-DCE
DICHLOROMETHANE
1,4-DIOXANE
ETHYL BENZENE
NAPTHALENE
PHENOL
PCE
1,1,1-TCA
1.1,2-TCA
TCE D
TOLUENE 'D
XYLENES D
40ppm
-ALL CONCENTRATIONS ARE IN PPM-
WESTON-TATb '
1985
LEA VENTS LAKE
Z-l Z-2 Z-3
1.0
1.1
0.44
0.1 0.2
0.25
1.2
0.29
0.12
0.01
0.45
0.12
0.04 0.06
2.5
1.6 1.2 2.7
0.67
0.16 D
2.5
1.04
20
0.1 0.1
1.1 1.1
D
• 0.69
10J
30 J
10
88
1.8 0.085
2.0
12
1.0 0.18
2.0 0.16
20 0.58
7.2 0.38
-------
* This summary table includes air-monitoring programs preformed
prior to the TAGA program.
a Fred C. Hart (1980) samples were analysed for TOC alone.
b WESTON-TAT (1985) samples were in conjunction with the Off-site
remedial investigation performed by CDM.
c "D" flag indicates that a compound was detected but not quatified.
"J" indicates an estimated concentration.
LEA indicates air samples taken above leachate seeps in the Chestnut
Branch marsh.
VENT indicates air samples taken at the on-site passive gas vents
LAKE indicates air samples taken above Alcyon Lake.
-------
—— Zone boundary
A Sampling point
200
200
Scale
Ftel
Marsh Air Emission Sampling Sites and Zones
LiPari Landfill. Gloucester County. New Jersey
-------
COMPOUND
BENZENE
BCEE
C3ALKYL BENZENES
1,1-DCA
1,2-DCA
1,1-DCE
DICHLOROMETHANE
1,4-DIOXANE
ETHYL BENZENE
FREON-12
ISOPROPYL BENZE^Z
M1K
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
1,1,1-TCA
1,1,2-TCA
TCE
TOLUENE
SUMMARY OF TAGA RESIDENTIAL AIR MONOTORING PROGRAM f i .-
HOWARD AVENUE
!
66
5J
-
15J
6J
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
2_
43
4J
3J
-
180
5
2J
37
5J
9J
-
10J
6J
3_
369
25
-
-
4J
10J
6J
45J
-
7J
14J
-
_
LOCATION &
HOLLY/CEDAR
1 2-3
165 89 53J
20J- 3J - -
_
_
- 3J -
- 1J -
-
- 12J -
- 6J -
- 13J -
_
_
- 87 -
SEASON *
LAKESIDE NEIGHBORHOODS SPILLWAY
123 1 23 1 2 3
21J 72 81 33J 17 39J 12J 27 36J
-4J8J - - 8J- --
-__ - - --__
---14J- ---_
-6J4J 4J4J --3J-
- - 1J -
-_- - - 2J • - --
30J 17J 22J - - 12J -
- 6J- -- - - 3J -
- 8J - 23J- 14J- --
- - 4J - - - - ' - -
- 5J - -- --6J-
- 5J - -47 --12J-
- 2J
- 7J
9J 8J
7J
31J
39J
26
- LJ -
- 7J -
- - 247 - - -
1J - 1J 18 -
7J - - - -
18 .8J 10J - 16J -
* SEASONS: 1-SPRING; Sanpling performed during May and June, 1986.
•• 2-SUMMER; Sampling performed during September, 1986.
3-FALLr Sampling performed during October and Noventoer, 1987.
"J" Compounds flagged with a "J" indicates that the compound was detected.
A value that is between the instrument detection limit and quantitat
-------
LEGEND
mmmmtm NOAO MOMENT MONtTOHINa MTH
FOR INTINSIVE STUDY
Iff OUCtUMt
ROAD SEGMENTS FOR INTENSIVE MONITORING
LIPARI LANDFILL. PITMAN, N.J.
APPHOX. SCALE: !*• 900*
-------
LEGEND
MONirOMINQ PATH
NEIGHBORHOOD AIR MONITORING PATHS
LIPARI LANDFILL, PITMAN, N.J.
APPROX. SCALE: f-900*
-------
of
»««|yili of
tantallwly IdMtifiod by TUBB kViM| ItKtral
Espies.
b«~.
Di-N-fropylaolw
Ethyl fcnttnt/iylM*
Urthyl Itofcrtyl Mont
t-lt Ucatiom III
tin iii* nu IU4 IILS ULI i2u iaa ia« cu ixi aj tu 1411
1
III IIII I
1 1
4
I IIII 1 Ml
IIII
1
I 1 1 I 1 I
1
1
1
1 1 1
1
II 1
1
1 I
1
1
hoplt Ucatiom 1 WTl HJYl Utt WTl 1
I4U I4U IS.I Q-? I9J Ittl «LZ HL3 SUI M BO 9M VI W V3 W Vi !
1
i i i i i i :
i
•
•
i
i
i i i i i i i i t
i
i i i i i i i i i t i i i i i i i
iiii >
Iiiiiiiiiiit i
ii i
lit i
i '•
i
i
lit i
• ;
•
i
:
. i
i iiiiii i iii
i
i :
t
i i
t *
ii :
i i
Mm
III C* Mkyl fcwNtln rafir* to any ta*D*4 Milk « carbon* MbrtiUtad
onto • binim rlM) rafardlm of thr dtfrat «f omatration of Iht
•I* dull*. O*. botyl btnifWl
ttl CI Mtyl Arwatlct r»lirt to any coopoo* •itk 3 carbon* MbttiUtad
onto • brnim rin| r*|ardln> of thr d»|in of «*atiralion of thr
•I* duii*. Ib. iMpropyl bmiw I C t»m»"jl temtwl
III CI hydrccyta* rafir* to «y MrttMilrtid fcytuctitun aith I
rtrtom In Hi *tnctwt. ticlvkt both alkiwi «nd (Ikftin.
Ul *iralii»/|«wnol rvffn an •toon rfiictt frtvvntt siular le
iol, or arihirl oyri^iw. Iht tRBP c«m4 Ntily
hl*«T. thtw mpawtfi i» dirty uapln.
Rl Oiivth|rl tmttld^iydr My kr lerwd iM thr MMIT* by • licvtt of
of lyltm and Iht Mltr »ipor.
1(1 C3 nllrllt rrftri to *?-lkthylM-ftit«wiitr|lt tr
Iht IflW i» vublt to dtfii* Iht eurt hydrocarbon •trurturt aid
drgrtt of wiuturition of thr OTI|IM| rmpntnl in Ihit uaplt.
IT)
-------
CONTAMINANTS TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED BY TAGA
DURING SPECTRAL ANALYSIS OF LEACHATE AND LAKE SURFACE HEADSPACE SAMPLES
AND AIR VENT GRAB SAMPLES
SEPTEMBER 1986
Compound
Action*
Ptopanol
MtthylltobutylKrtonr
C5 O*yfj*n«t«4 Hydtcxaibon
C( Hydio<»ibont
Caibon T*li*ihlotMr
llhyton* Clycol
•enrvn*
Tolucn*
1.)-DkMoro«lh*ne|)|
C)AMylAfom*1ict
t.4.|Moi*fw
1,1.1 -TikMoroclhcnc
CMotobenten*
CJAIkylAiomclkt
PkoKnf/Mwnol
Clt«0l
1.1-Okhlorovlhcnc
C7 Hydioccrboni
S«n
III \W4nnt trpmtrrlin I rivuptixtmr irixtit (I '
r numl>ri. Vnplpitln
i* on lln- IAJ.A
lMim!- 1'iH'il
l lot Iml tMi'ii1 mil ili*li*i l
14} flu* lntltiwini| t.ti(|«*t iiiMl.lmiiMiil\ Vtfl'lP rfii
I I I III Ml >• I •••lll,l»C IcIl.lllllllllH-llx'IM'
lliililiiiimii-lli.inc (Mi'lliyli-url liliMiilr) I I/ linlili ...... II ..... ••
lit'itn \f tin liliiiiM'tlifiii*
-------
FALL AIR AND LEACHATE ANALYSES FOR LIPARI LANDFILL
PITMAN, NEW JERSEY
SUMMARY OF METHOD
The Trace Atmospheric Gas Analyzer (TAGA) 6000E was used to perform
headspace analyses on leachate from the perimeter of the Lipari Landfill
and surface waters from Alcyon Lake. Headspace analyses were performed or,
leachate and surface water samples to determine the possible
concentrations of target contaminants. Ai«- v**»» were directly sairpled as
well to determine the possible concentratu- • target contaminants.
OBSERVATIONS
The headspace technique used in this phase of analyses is a modified
procedure compared to that utilized 1n previous studies. Previously-
observed data showed the formation of hydrocarbon/water clusters that
possibly obscured the target compounds results and complicated the
ionization process. This headspace technique perhaps can be characterized
as a method development procedure. Thus, a presentation of the data in a
quantitative manner could lead to different interpretations by technical
reviewers. Caution should be exercised when interpreting the leachate and
surface water quantitative data, as no procedure was utilized to replenish
the analyte in the headspace. Additionally, no systematic performance
evaluation procedure h»s been developed for this technique.
-------
lAHPlt lOCAIIMt:
HIM lEAOINtt:
COMPOUND
8H(2-CNIMOE1NHI 11««*
8INIENE
EtNtl IENIENE
lOtUENE
Cl Al«U 8E«ItNt
lEIIACNlMOHMNt
IIUNlMOflNEM
1,1.1-IIICNIMOEINAN(
1,1-OKHlMOEINANE
1.2-OICNlMOEIltANt
1.1-OICNlMOtlMNE
OICMlOICNflNANt
1 4-DIOxAME
ACE1ME
MEINU II08U1U «E1ME
IIEM-12
tAHPlf lOCAIIMl:
- NNU IEADINIS:
'
COMPOUND
8ISI2-CNIMOE 1OTII IIHEI
IIN1ENE
Emu IENIENE
101 UE lit
Cl Aim lENIENt
lEIIACNIOIOEINfM
iiiCNiMOEtNEMi
1.1.1 IIICIIlOIOItNANt
1.1.2-IIICNlMOtlNA«l
1.1-OICNlMOtllUUIt
1.2-oiCNiMotiNANi
1.1-OICNiMOEtNf«t •
OICNIMOHE INANE
1.4-OIOIANE
ACE1ME
MEiNfi itMum «I»MI
IIIM-12
oi • OIHCIIM iimu
0pb • PAIIt HI IHUM
IEA-I
0.8 pro
AVC. Mi.
01 CMC.
(ppbl (ppbl
. 1 01*1
6 01*6
28 Of 28
11/ 01- It/
IP 01*10
« 01*8
9 Of*
11 01* li
/ OI-/
/ 01*'
1 Of 1
21 01*21
11 01*'*
201 01*20}
9 01*9
8 Of 8
IEA-10
20 pp»
AVC. Mi.
01 CMC .
(ppbl Ippbl
6 01*6
9 01*9
41 01*41
281 01*281
10 01*10
4] 01*41
1} 01*11
14 01*14
11 01*11
/ Of/ .
9 01*9
4 01*4
10 Of W
20 01*20
260 01*260
IS Of IS
11 Ofll
IEI 2
Mt.
' .CMC.
(ppbl
01*1
01 •»
Bf 28
Of ur
Of 10
01*14
Of 8
Of 9
01*11
Of/
Of/
01*1
01*21
01*11
01*201
Of 9
of a
If A- 11
t PP»
Mt.
CMC.
(ppbl •
Of 6
01*9
01*41
100 •
01*10
01*41
Ofll
Ol"14
Of 11
Of/
01*9
Oft
Of 10
01*20
Of 26O
01*11
01*11
IEA 1
Mt.
CMC.
iprtl
;,:
If 28
Of U/
oi -- in
Of it
B4'8
01*9
Ofll
Of/
Of/
01*1
01*21
01*11
01-201
Of 9
Of*
UA IV
o-i r>"
Mt.
CMC.
(ppbl
01-6
01*9
Ofll
01*281
Of JO
01*11
Ofll
Of U
Of IS
01-7
Of 9
01 -t
01 '10
01 '20
Of 260
01 -IS
Of 11
vuo>it loriiiMt:
NNU IEIPINCS:
>vr. .
01
COMPOUND (ppbl
nt(2-ciuMotmii EI'NEI 1
(I«U IENIEW 28
101 utm it/
CI Aim IENIINI 10
1.1,1 iiicmOAOimtiiE 9
1,1,2-IIICNlMOEINANf 11
1.1-OICNlMM INANE '. /
1.2-OICNIMOEINANE /
l.t-OldUMOEINENE 1
OICNlMOHEINANt 21
1.4-OIOIANE 11
ACttME 201
MEINIl liMUHl IE1MI 9
IIEM-12 8
tAMPlt lOCAIIONi:
NNU NEAOINGf:
IVC.
01
COMPOUND IppKI
8ltl2-CNlOIOClNni EINEI 6
8EHICNE 9
EI»U 8ENIINE 41
IOIUENS 281
Cl Aim ItNIENE 10
IftlACNlMOEINENt 41
1IICNIMOCIHENE IS
,1.1-IIICNlMOElNANE l»
,1.2-IHCNlMOIIIlANE IS
,1-OICNlMOEINANE ;
,2-OICNlMOEINIII( ' «.
.1-DICNlMOEtNINE
OICNIOICMIIHINE 10
1.4-OIOIANE 20
ArEIME 2MI
HI mil ItMUlU IEIME IS,
HIM 12 »l
IEA 4
10 pp>
MS.
CMC.
ippbl
181
466
401
100 •
119
Of It
Of 8
Of «
111
81
IB/
24
419
01*11
100 •
299
11
1(1 11
0.1 PP»
Mt.
CMC.
Ippbl
Of 6
Of 9
Of41
01*281
01*10
01*41
Ofll
01*14
Ofll
OI*/
Of 9
Of 4
Of 10
Of 20
Of 2AO
Of IS
01-11
III 1
0.1 pp>
Mi.
CMC.
(ppbl
111
9
191
100 •
Of in
Of '4
Of 8
Of 9
Ofll
Of/
Of/
Of 1
01*21
01*1}
01 >201
18
Of 8
IIA-I4
1 PP»
Mt.
CMC.
(ppbl
01 > 6
01*9
• 01*41
01-281
01*10
01-41
01*11
Of 14
01-11
Of/
Of9
Oft
Of SO
Of20
Ol'/AO
Ofll
Ofll
IEA 6
2 pp>
Mt.
CMC.
(ppbl
01*1
01.6
( '.'9
."»
. t
If ..1
Of 8
01-9
Ofll
Of/
Of/
Of 1
01*21
Ofll
01*201
01 '.
C '.
IIA-ll
2 PC-
MI.
CMC.
Ippbl
Of 6
Cf9
01-41
Pf 281
If JO
l>f 41
I.I. IS
(if 11
nf 11
(if 7
If 9
III •!
Of 10
Of 20
01 'MO
Ofll
Ofll
tAKPlE lOCAIIMt
*mi il to 1 Nit
COMPOUND
8lt(2-CNlMOEINTl| Elm
IENIINE
IINTl IINIENE
•OlufNf
CI Aim IENIENE
lEIIACNlMOEINENt
IIICNIMOE1MENE
l.t.t-IIICNlMOEIMM
I.I.2-IIICNIMOE1NANE
I.I-OICNIMOEINANE
I.2-OICNIMOE INANE
OICNIMOHE INANE
1.4-OIOIANE
ACEIME
HElNIl ItMUIIl (ilMf
IIEM-12
fAMPH lOCAIIMi:
NNU lEADIIIGi:
COMPOUND
• lt(2-CNlMOEINUI IINEI
OtN/EIM
EI«U MNKNE .
IO.UENI
Cl f>U 8EM/ENE
tElltCNiMOEIHENE
1II 3. '28
ur of u/
10 01*10
14 01*44
8 01*8
9 01*9
11 01*11
/ Of/
/ Of/
1 01*1
21 01*21
11 01*11
20] 01*201
9 01*9
8 01*8
IEA 16
III-8
1 PP-
Mt.
CMC.
Ippbl
01*1
Of 6
01*28
Of ur
01*10
01*44
01*8
01*9
01*11
Of/
rt-r
Of 1
01*21
01*11
01*201
01*9
01*8
IEA I/
IEI-9
160 pp.
Mt.
CMC.
(ppbl
01*1
Of 6
01*28
01. ur
01*10
01*44
Of8
Of9
Of 11
Of/
Of/
01*1
01*21
01*11
01*201
01*9
01*8
IEA 18
•0.1 pp» .0.1 pp. Ml IEAOIK
AVC. Mt.
01 CMC.
(ppt*1 (ppbl
• 01*6
* 01*9
41 01*41
281 01 *281
10 Of 10
41 Oft!
11 01.11
14 01*14
11 K.IS
/ H>»
9 01*9
4 01.4
10 01*10
20 01 -20
760 01 >?*?
IS M = IS
11 M.I1
Mt.
CONC.
(ppbl
Of6
01*9
01*41
01*281
01*10
01*41
01*11
01*14
01*11
M./
01*9
01*4
Of 10
Of 20
Of 260
Of IS
Ofll
an.
CMC.
(ppbl
01 •«
01*9
01*41
01*281
01*10
01*41
Ofll
01*14
Ofll
Of/
01*9
01*4
01*10
01-20
01-260
Ofll
Ofll
MS. CMC. - 08SEIVEO CMtlNliUlM
• - HAIINUN VAIUES MSEIVIO AIOVI 100 pph
pp*^Bkfli Pll Kill ln«
-------
LIPARI LANDFILL SITE
PITMAN, NJ
0 COMPREHENSIVE SAMPLING
t LIMITED SAMPLING
VETLAND
- WATERBDDY
- PAVED ROAD
—-DIRT ROAD
305 METERS i
1000
KPA/FRT MARCH 1988
-------
ATTACHMENT C
QUALITATIVE SUMMARY OF COMPOUNDS
DETECTED IN THE ON-SITE LIPARI
LANDFILL AND IN OFF-SITE AREAS
-------
QUALITATIVE SUMMARY OF COMPOUNDS DETECTED ON-SITE & OFF-SIYE LIPARI AREAS
TILES
COMPOUND
CKLOROMETHANS
BRaCMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLQRCETHANE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACETONE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1 . 1-DICHLOROETHENE
1 . IrDICHLOROETHANT
1,2-DICHLCPOETHENE
CHLOROFORM
1 , 2-DICHLGRCE7KANE
1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANS
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
VINYL ACETATE
BRCMODICHLORa-ETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPENE
cis-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
DIBROMOCKLORa-ZTHVN'
1,1, 2-TRICH
RM
4-METHYL-2-PE:?rAN'OKE
TETRACHLCROETHE::E
1,1,2,2-T
TOLUENE
CHLOROBENTENE
ETHYLBENZENE
STYPENE
XYLEf^S
2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER X
C3ALKYL BEN12
CgALKANE
-REON-12
.1,4-DIOXANE
ON-SITE
COHANSEY
SOIL
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
V
X
X
X
:^^
'**•
X
X
X
X
X
R x
WAT
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
OFF-SITE
CNSY KWDOD
WAT WAT
X
X X
X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X X
X
X X
X
X X
X
X X
X
X X
MARSH CHNT BR
SOIL LEA
X
X
X
X X
X X
X X
X
X X
X X
X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X X
X
X
X X
X X
X X
X X
AIR SEP WAT
X
X X
X XX
X
X
X
X X
X XX
X
X X
X
X XX
X
X XX
X
X X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
R FUN ALCYDN REsr^Err:.;:
SEDWAT SBDKATAIR AIR
X
X
X X X X X
XX X X X X
X
X
X X
X
X X
X XXX
X X
X
X X X X X
X
X
X X
XX X X X X
X XX
X
X X
X X
X
KEY:
CNSY- Cohansey Aquifer
KWOOD-Kirfcwood Aquifer
MARSH-Chestnut Branch Marsh
R RUN-Rabbit Run
ALCYON-Alcyon Lake
CHNT BR^Jiestnut branch stream
WAT-Water sample
LEA-Leachate sa.mple
AJR-Air sa.iiple
-------
QUALITATIVE SUMMARY OF COMPOUNDS DETECTED ON-SITE & OFF-SITE LJPARI AREAS
SSKI-VPLATILES
COMPOUND
MUCH CHOT BR R RUN ALCyON RESIDE?
SOIL LEA AIR SED MAT SED WAT SED WAT AIR AIP.
PHENOL
bis (2-CHLOROE7HYL) ETHER
2-CHLORQPHENOL
1,3-DICKLOROBENZENE
1,4-DICHLOR03E?:ZENT
BENZYL ALCOHOL
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE
2-METHVL PHE^JCL
bis (2-CHLOROISOPROPYL)ETHER
4-METHYL PHENOL
N-NITROSO-DI-N-PROPYLAMINE
HEKACHLOROETHANE
NITROBENZENE
ISCPHORDKE
2-SITROPKEJJOL
2,4-DWETHYL PHENOL
ECHOIC ACID
bis (2-CHLQRQ£THO>or)ETHASZ
2,4-DICHLORDPHENOL
1.2,4-TRlCHLORDBEN'ZENE
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLQROANILXSE
HEXACHLORCavrrADIESE
4-CHLORO-3-METHYL PHENOL
2-METHYL NAPHTHALENE
HSXACHLORCCYCLOPENT.ADIE2
2.4. 6-TRJCHLOROPHZS'OL
2 . 4 , 5-TRJCHLORDPHENOL
2-NITROWW.ISE
DI>E7Kn. PHTHALATE '(
. .JENAPHTHALENE
3-NITROANALISE
ACPWHTHEN'E
2 . 4-DIN1TROPHENOL
4-NTTROPHENOL
DIBQ30FURAS
2 . ^DINITROTOLUENE
2. 6-DINITROTOLUD2
DIETHYL PHTHALATE
4-CHLOROPHENYL-PHENYLETHER
FLOURENE
4-S1TRDAS1UNE
4. 6-DISITRO-2^METHYLPHEJOL
S-SITROSODIPHENYLAMINE
4-BROM3PHENYL-PHENYLETHER
HEXACHLOROBENZE.'E
PEOTACHLOROPHENOL
PHB5tt»THP£NE
ANTHRACENE
x X
x x
x
x
x x
X X
X x
x x
x
X x
x
x
x x
x
x
X
X X
x x
x •
x x
x
x
X
X
X X
XXX
X
X X
X
X X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X X
X
X X
X X
XXX
X
X X
X
X X
X
X X
X X
X X
x
x
X
x
X
x
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
-------
QUALITATIVE SUMMARY OF COMPOUNDS DETECTED ON-SITE & OFF-SITE LIPARI AREAS
SEMI-VOLATILES . ON-SITE
GDHANSEY
COMPOUND SOIL WAT
DI-N-BUTYL PffTHALATE
FLOURANTHENE
PYRENE
BIJTYLBENZYL PHTHALATE
3 . 3 ' -DICHLOROBENZENE
B ENZO ( a ) ANTHRACENE
BIS( 2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE
CHRYSENE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHAIATE
BENZO(b)FLOURANTHENE
BENZOfk ) FLOURANTHENE
BENZO( a) PYRENE
INDENOd. 2, 3-cd) PYRENE
DIBENZO(a,h)ANTHRACENE
BENZO(g , h, i ) PERYLENE
INORGANIC
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIIM
CATMIIJM
CHRCMItJM
COPPER
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
RELENIIM
SILVER
THALIIM
VANADUM
/.TNT
*
X X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X X
X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X
X X
X X
X X
OFF-SITE
CNSY KWOOD
WAT WAT
X
X
X X
X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
MARSH
SOIL
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
CHNT BR
IFA AIR SED WAT
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X X
. X X
X X
X X
X
X X
X X
X
X
X X
R RUN ALCYON RESIDENTIAL
SED WAT SED
XXX
X X
X X
X
X X
XXX
X X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X X
X X
XXX
XX X
XXX
XXX
X XX
XX X
XX X
X X
X X
XX X
WAT AIR AIR
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
-------
ATTACHMENT D
GEOLOGIC PROFILES
-------
Akiwum aul M«4i Smfcmmt
OBPW Cohans** Sand
low* Co>>anw» Sand
Southwest
E
IW-
Northeast
E'
120
f^^^S&pft
**••*•" "" * .*.•'"'••*"i* **4"C*Vr ' "." *•'-..*
n J"j 11T YI i'rVri.-_:"i"firi_'>-'- - ---?•*-y •-'
20 J
20
Section E-Ef
-------
Northtasl
O'
too
1£0DVWSol\<^J
.«, f
c
"\
-------
I ..".... .-a
I ' .III Upper Conantcy Sand
!• .•fcj
I j Ioo«» Conantty Sand
[ 1 K«kmxxl Sand
I* , , I Uanatquan FotmaMnt
I I VmctMown f oima-oni
BeMh
C
r. -n ff . /, /s •.' ',y. f/t
'4uaZEtu n-m» rrrTfTttit tift't <*&/**<<"•"
-------
*lu<"um ** M»,i, S)H»
o
a-
i2£O*'*»oodcij,
•
> *•«»*»* r***^ B.
•M
Section B-Bf
-------
cu
At***! VJj Matth S*4on«
' i > I
i : : I Vmc«nto«m *a
: •" "-"rj
- v--s* -i-- •
^•^^^£rfifc^.iVvrH^j^4^v.^'^-rS-:">^l3sirir^^^^ •
Section A-A*
-------
I GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTIONS
-------
»V S»9 -ifl
uos* COIWMT S**
Soulhwtst
F
120-1
100-
eo-
Slurry Wall
Marsh Aria
s
I
Chestnut Branch
14
40-
20-
Northtast
f
120
100
80
•20'
-60 I
20
-0
-20
Section F-Ff
-------
ATTACHMENT E
PROPOSED REMEDIAL ACTION PLA'I
-------
' »f rimndi TvtiUwly UMtifio* by TWB Ivi* tfKtrol
fculyilt of ttftm iMttutt.
Co*o»ri
Di-H-oropylwIw
^^^ j^^
fCVtfW
Cthyl fcnimt/iylmt
MM ItctMtyl Mow
t-%thyl-l-tat*nol
k-*ntlMM •ttfwl
rT v/ivw jiycvi
fcrylMlOt
ticfilerorthM
llt-tt-C«llorofthyll tthtr
•rrolim
Frcpwol$
hnitw
1>l m»
ivivnv
01 Mkyl IV«Mlln III
U HUyl •nMtm 121
't ihrit tiii^a
CvWyivnuiv
kntyl «lct*iol
flkitlm ilvnl
Klnyiviv ply^vl
litthyl rthrr
totan Titradilorl*
P MyO>ot«rbot» III
CIO Ilyo>or«rb8m 111
O ftjoinydt or Rrtont
•iralim/ltanol 141
Mtnol
B l»»«t»buii III
llorthyl knitlo^iyat 191
CS Nilrilt Id
n fcnmtid »»y*uB ai
Styrmt CEIhyltf* bmtral
Oilarobtmtnt
l^lt LecotioM III
mi 111? nu iiL4 ins ULI ia? aj ta« as ixi a? iu 1*11
i .
IB • • • • •
III III
III till I
1 1
4l
1
II 1 1 1 1 I Ml
III •••••• •
• • o> I • P I I I I
1 "l 1 1 1
1
II 1 II |
1
1
1
I 1 1
If •
I I
1 1
• V
1 I
•-•••• |
II 1
1
1 1
1
1
1
(•pit Location* 1 Wtt Mm UK UT( !
i*u i«u ia.1 n* nJ IH.I iu? HLJ an ae BO SM vi ve vj w vj t
i
i i i i i i :
i
•
i
i
i i i i i i i i t
i
Iitiiiiiiti iiiiit
• ••••^••••A •••••!
1 I 1 I t
II 1
II I 1
1 >
(••••II t
• ••••• '
III 1
I S
•
:
t
i
i
iiiiiii i ii:
<
1 !
«
1 '
1 -«
I 1 !
II !
Mm
III M Mbyl froMttCt r*for» to «r e«oo*d Kith « urban*
o*to • kwtiw ri*| r*|v4lttt of the o>fror of voatration of the
•I* dwlr*. CU. bityl bnutw>
ttl O *lkyl AroMtict rtfort to ony tnopu»< oith 1 corbont •**tit«tid
onto • btnim ring rvfirdlm of th» oi|iii of omjtiratian of th»
•lot dMiflt. Id. Itopropfl bMfw I g|>i»tn|l kmitntl
CJI d hydrmytem rtftrt to my mrMMiltttd hydrcc«tton «ilk I
rvtom in ill ttrvrtirt. lirlntn hath tllumt «d tlknvt.
1*1 ^iroliw/i^cnol rvfin «n nfciain rfiicti fr«|vntf titilv le .
iw, |tmal, or vthfl pyritfiM. H» IflfiP carnal Mtily
tolmtt. IhM* c«*piMitfi i* y4r My If lorvd in lh» totrtt by • tit«*t of
of iyl»m wd Iht Mlfr vipor.
tt) C3 nilrllt r»frr» lo V-Mrthyliw-fMtmnitrilt ir M
Iht IflBfl it mibl* to o>'11* tt* turl hfdroc*rban itrurlvrr tn)
•>gr<* of •vulurilion of Ihf OM|IM| rb*praml in Ihn uaplr.
ITI n Ihirgo-vi'.o' hftfrararor. jlw. i-cl'uli". fliypnulnt rrrlr*M-|.|j-»
-------
CONTAMINANTS TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED BY TAGA
DURING SPECTRAL ANALYSIS OF LEACHATE AND LAKE SURFACE HEADSPACE SAMPLES
AND AIR VENT GRAB SAMPLES
SEPTEMBER 1986
Sample location* (I)
Compound Itll Illl /HI lilt 1)1) 1)11 fill 1111 fill Mil f«ll Mil fill fill 1SII Mil Itll fill SMM IW> tWl VI VI V)
Acetone x x K x x
Ptoptnol X * *
•M)cMo>oelhyl)*lHei XXX X
MtlhyMtobutylKrtone X X
CiOiyqenttedHydicxaibon X
CtHydiooibofll X
Oibon TetitchloiMe H x x
llhylvneClyCol X *
•entene X . *
Toluene XXX
1.)-DkMofoeltune(l) »
ClAltylAiomdict X
1.4-0io««ne
1.1.1 -Tikhlotoelhjne
CMotobentene
ClAlkylAiom»lkt
PkoKne/Hienol
Cietol
l.t OiiMoioelhene
C7 Hydioc«ibont
X
X
xxx xx'*x xx xxx
xxxx xxx *
X XX XXXX
XX XX
xx x x
X
X N
XX X
X X
X XX
X
X
»
Noltt
(I) ttaimni) tyttem uted loi le*l •>*!«' wniil*-* /il|i«-lrn
In/onpil ra I. tW.ielnt tit iu> fair xorfln trfm|ilr numlwi. Vnrlritlo
Vi-nl NumlH>i i An H JlJ
C7) I./ iliililoiiH>lh«n»/«inyliMiiM<4i> H|I*II|II,I|\|M>I (14 nnltit* lAfiA
( II \W4 mil if>|>iiilrr1 m I n»»rt|Mm\p IPIMII! (I »«in'\|Mintr I'lll '« I
14) lln< lull. iwii
I I III! llllMI
l iil.intm.iiilt Mt'
l«>ll.tl Illlllll4*lll***ll»
liiililiiim-lliclif
-------
FALL AIR AND LEACHATE ANALYSES FOR LIPARI LANDFILL
PITMAN, NEW JERSEY
SUMMARY OF METHOD
The Trace Atmospheric Gas Analyzer (TAGA) 6000E was used to perform
headspace analyses on leachate from the perimeter of the Lipari Landfill
and surface waters from Alcyon Lake. Headspace analyses were performed on
leachate and surface water samples to determine the possible
concentrations of target contaminants. A-** v»«** were directly sarpled as
well to determine the possible concentratu- • target contaminants.
OBSERVATIONS
The headspace technique used in this phase of analyses 1s a modified
procedure compared to that utilized in previous studies. Previously-
observed data showed the formation of hydrocarbon/water clusters that
possibly obscured the target compounds results and complicated the
ionization process. This headspace technique perhaps can be characterized
as a method development procedure. Thus, a presentation of the data in a
quantitative manner could lead to different interpretations by technical
reviewers. Caution should be exercised when Interpreting the leachate and
surface water quantitative data, as no procedure Mas utilized to replenish
the analyte in the headspace. Additionally, no systematic performance
evaluation procedure hcs test, developed for this technique.
-------
S*H»IE lOMIICMS:
imu IliOINGS:
COMPOUND
OISI2-CNIMOE1IIU) IIMI
If -JUNE
imn HHimt
lOUJtHf
Cl »l«U 8ENIEIE
lltltCNIOIOf IRtllt
IIICmOIOElNlNE
.l.l-ltlCNlMOEIIUlE
.1.2-l«IClllO»OElM»»E
,1-OICHlMOflMIIE
.roiCNUMociMMi
.1-OICHlMOttMNE
oicmoiomi«.Ni
t,4-OIO»*NE
»CIIONE
MtlNTl IS08U1U IEIME
IIION-12
SAMPLE IOMIIONS:
NNU IIIOINIS:
/
COMPOUHO
imz-cnoiotwo EIHII
iiNtEM
E1NH OENIEUE
lOlUfME
Cl Aim 8EI2EIE
iiti*CNio*.otiiitiif
tucmoioEiiiENt
1.1.1-mciiioiafiMMf
IJ.I-ltlCNlOMftMK
1.1-oicmoiotiiiM.E
1.2-OIC«lO«OII««liE
1.1 oicmoioiiMiii •
oiCNiofOMCtNiiiE
1.4-OIO»«t
tCCICME
•EINTl ISO8UIU lEIONl
lttON-12
*vc.
01
(PPh)
. S
6
28
147
10
4*.
R
*
IS
7
1
21
IS
)n*.
cU!
»
8
«vc.
01
Ippb)
1 •
«
4S
|28I
i 10
Ui
111
i'*
i »
I '
/ •'
i 4
/ »
i 20
i 260
i "
11
If* 1
0.8 pc-
Ml.
CCMC.
»r
Of 10
01*44
01*8
Of 9
Of IS
Of7
01*'
Ol'l
01*21
MBl-t
• 1»
01 .20)
Of*
Of 8
ll«-10
20 PPM
MS.
CONC.
Ippbl
01 -«
01 >«
01-4S
01*281
01*10
01*41
Of IS
01*14
Of IS
Of' .
01*9
01*4
Of 10
01*20
01*260
Of IS
Ol'll
III 2
14. S pP->
MS.
• .COMC.
(ppbl
OfS
01 *6
01*28
Of 147
OHIO
Of44
Hi _-k
9t*V
Of*
Of IS
of
01*7
01*1
01*21
Of IS
01*20}
Of*
Of 8
U»-I1
2PM.
MS.
CCMC.
(ppbl
Of 6
Of*
Of4S
SOO •
Of 10
01*41
Of IS
01.14
oi >is
01*7
Of*
Of 4
01*10
01*20
Ol'26O
Of IS
01*11
II* 1
« ««•
MS.
CCMC.
IP*I
• S
li .6
(•(•28
Of !«•'
Of in
Of 4*
04-8
01 '«
01 -IS
01-'
oi> r
Of 1
Of 21
01" IS
Of201
Of*
Ol'll
U»-l/
o-i r"
MS.
CCMC.
Ippbl
01*6
01*9
01-4S
01*281
Of 10
01*41
Of IS
Of U
Of IS
Of
Of9
Of 4
01 >10
Of 20
01*260
Of IS
Ol-ll
SIKPII I Of II IONS:
HNU tl .DllltV
C.-WPOUMO
iitd cmoiociiut EI'MEI
II 171 M
HUH IINIINI
tOlUEIII
Cl IKTl n»ll8
."*
. »
If 1.4
Of 8
Of 9
Of IS
Of'
01*'
Of 1
01*21
Of IS
Of20«
oi.:
C '.
IK-IS
2 PP»
MS.
CCMC.
Ippb)
Of*
Tf*
Of 4S
ra- 281
11-10
01*41
l.f IS
01*14
ni> is
IU< 7
1 1 .9
(II -4
01-10
01. JO
01-260
01 -IS
01-11
S*Wll IOCMIONS
mu 1I.OI-K.S
COMPOMO
IE*-'
• pp.
*VC. MS.
01 CONC.
(PPb) (ppta)
8isi2-CNioioiiNn) IIMI
8EI2EKE
Hull IINIEME
IMUENE
Cl »U«l IINIIH
1fll*ClllMOEIII|«E
incmoioftMNE
.I.|.|I|C«IM(XI|UIIE
.1.2-HICIIlMOtlMNE
,1-OICHlOIOfllUNt
.2-oicmoiotiMNE
.I-DICIIIO*OIIMIN{
oicmo*a«itH*Nt
1.4-OIOItut
UIICME
Mflmk IS08U1«l (ElONE
IIION-12
SU-PII IOC*IIONS:
NNU II*OIHCS:
CONPOUNO
klSII-CNinoEINTl) IIMI
8IN/INE
IlNH UNtlNl .
IOIUENC
ci .-«»i tt»n»(
U1(.;uiOIOf IMNI
ll|i*ii:«OlliitNI
.1 i-m|CmCMOE1ii*ii|
.1.2-K>ICHlCMOtlN*NI
.1 1 II^IOIOIIII«»I
,2-rit«ic>>oiiMNi
.i-DiiximniHiKf
OICNlOtCMflHtHI
1.4 DIOKMI
ttrtoMi
NIINU ISOIUIll (IICMI
III ON 1?
*vc.
01
(pf*>
«
*
4S
281
10
41
IS
14
IS
7
«
4
SO
20
?60
IS
II
S OfS
* 01*4
-------
«:««••
•VI.
0;
:>::.-: (BBC:
is •:-.:<:!•••. •••£« i
«•.:!»« S
!•-. i?*:r«£ «
"..ins . I
:3 «.«-. «»:!«.! 2c
'!••»:•. 3»:r-£»j 11
!'!:?T:!""t%! *
".'.••••::-.S»:P-»»! t
•.••:::-.5«:c"-««; i
•.:•:::-. s«:r-«sj i
•^:-!^-!!!"!s? ••
\l:::i.Ki "" 3
*:r:sc u
•!*••» :s:i.**. «£"»! 4
'»!:•••: 3
::»:*•
vtk-- rtk-2
»;:»• i »:.'»• 2 >e:k- 1 »cikT 2
•VS. AtfS. AV2. AVC. AVt.
e. C9k:. e>:. es*:. ee*:.
(see (oec: (BBC: (BBC. (BK:
4 e..'' Oi.« D..- :..-
IT e.«i D.'S o.«s e.«s
2C o.*e o;«6 o.«e e>>6
U ei>S Dl«i Ol-i Dk«i
»5 B.«2: D>>2: Bl«2C fi;«2:
*c oitu o.i •.« BL*U o.«^e
13 B.«. B.«4 OL» a;>4
13 Bl«* 8;>« fil>4 C.'i
3 OlV Ol«* D^«l Ol»i
6 t.-: e.>i c.-2 c.«2
s e.i2 e.i2 Bi'2 :.i2
>: C.'J C.O Di-3 C.'J
*' 4} J 4' J O J J5 .
•- c.». :.». o.«- t.«.
1C t.-! B.»3 B'.«3 C.tJ.
•!••::»: :« t«:r- :>:o.s::
«.-:
.::»• .::.- i
i • • -
::>:. ::«:.
(ss:. :»
t .
.•*. .1!
.»t .ti
-•! .'!
.«:: .•;:
..•• ..-•
...
. •• •-
. • * .• '
.•: .«:
•'!. •'!.
!o
3! . 3: .
.«- .«.
.•i .•:
S*-1 S.-2 (.-3
»: ico: «s ucu: •: nc:
*•;.
O--X-.
MS.
eo»:.
(BBC)
MS.
co«:.
MS.
lor.f
si:
•. v-ti::-. s« ;;•-*•
3:
»3
t$
r
o
4
3:
20
263
15
11
e.te
6.. 6
.•t
;;*, ^;'5
»:: • »:: •
1.43 r.^ij
.•:. B.«u
1.15 Bl«1S
..r Bi>T
i«9 Bl««
.•32 Ol'JO
i>20 81 '20
i,»26: Bl«263
;«^5 Bi«l5
.-.5
.•21-
!llls
B..U
Bl«'i
Bl.T
BL«
Bi*3:
e.-2:
B.-26:
Bl*1!
C.»-
€-•
6;»t
B.«"
C;.«
:!i!
:^'2
:.«2
^ • '
«t » •
Dt'tl
pet • »»••» »ti
oij. e>:. • MIEIVI: co»:ik-i»-i>
• • ui:«j> »»iuct Mstivt: tir.t i::
-------
LCQENO
• LAKi tUMFACC SAMPLE
LAKE SURFACE HEADSPACE SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND NUMBERS
LIPAPI LAMOFII.L. PITMAN. N.J.
-------
LfCENO
v/
LANDFILL AIM VENT
LEACNATl STREAM EMANATING
MOM lASI OF LANDFILL
EMIANKMENT
•O- OM-tlTI MONITORING WILL
• LfACMATt NCAOS'ACe SAMPLE
IV-LEA1
\ \
ZONE IV-LEA2
ZONE JV-LEA3
LEACHATE HEADSPACE AND AIR VENT
GRAB SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND NUMBERS
LIPARI LANDFILL, PITMAN. N.J.
-------
Staple location
Aluminum
Antiauny
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt •
Copper
Cyanide
Iron
Lead
Magnesium.
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
rotassluB
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Tin .
Vanadium
Sine
Saapl* location
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Cyanide
Iron
Lead
Magnesium.
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
PotassluB
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Sine
R-l
SIS
STO
100
1125)
4.90
4.70
soooo
7.«u
200
|20)M
10J
11400
•
IMgJ
0.16UM
2MI
5180
SUM
7.1UK
(140
10UM
160
210
215
C-29
1018
500
SO
196 IN
2U*
f
•0100
27
100
100
100
•285
•
|4(00|
194
0.20
100
(1(00)
so
! (1
21700E
1 MI
i 400
i 26
I
R-2
188
STO
100
1196)
4.90
4. TO
(000
7. BO
200
Him
11J
21600
SUM
JS60
Q.KUM
250
ISion)
Urn
a
1)900
•
160
910
128
C-29 DO
MIS
SOU
so
I06N
SON
1
79100
(S
IOU
IOU
IOU
•S74
• •
10000
19?
0.20
100
|3(00|
50
IIS
23900C
SO
400
70
i
I
CDM
R-3A R-4 R-S
388 241 1400
570 STO STO
100 100 100
1(10 450 |42)
4.90 4. 90 4.90
(4 4.70 4.70
•2000 S4200 9640
10 7.80 7.80
20O 200 200
14UM 140M 14UM
• • •
1B4000 COSOO 41SOO
I040J • SUM
42600 14800 11250)
1240 446 111
1987
*"*
1178)
570
100
186)
4.90
4.70
21200
7.80
2flU
14UM
41
12100
•
2290
2!-7
O.KUM. 0.16UM O.KUM 0.16UM
45 250 2SO
•360 5710 20(0
SUM SUM SUM
• • •
132000 (0(0 45100
a • •
3(0 360 360
123) 210 210
35300 190 190
tuple location C-ll
Aluminum 1210
Antimony STO
Arsenic 10O
Barium 191]
Beryllium 4.90
Cadmium 4. TO
Calcium 19600
Chromium 7. BO
Cobalt 200
Copper 14UM
Cyanide *
Iron 11200
Lead •
Hagne-fium (180
nangwtete 171
Mercury 0.16UM
Nickel 250
rotassiwm | 20601
Eelenlua SUM
silver •
Sodium S450
Thallium •
Tin 16U
Vanadium 21O
• t 1 Oil
Zinc iw
2MI
•110
SUM
•
4S10
a
160
210
91
C-32
3010
570
IOU
UBS)
4.90
4.70
20400
IB
200
140M
*
22400
•
13100
146
0.16UM
250
(2060)
SUM
•
12600
•
|17)
210
1911
A WV
J estimated value for a tenatlvely Identified compound. 1)
M Indicates spike SMple recovery v»s not within control limits.
U Coopound wat analyzed for but not detected. Detection limit •
R-7
140
570
100
1200)
4.90
4.70
38500
7.80
200
Him
4)
74200
•
12180)
911
O.I6UM
250
12500
SUM
•
14810)
• • •
160
21U
95
C-ll
7610
570
100
199)
4.90
4.70
10600
41
200
HUM
4»
28100
•
1S800
161
0.16UM
11
12060)
SUM
•
9580
•
360
210
% «
R-« R-9
525 S94
570 STO
100 100
IBM 118)
4.90 4.90
4. TO 24
11(000 M100
7.80 13
200 200
Hun HUM
• 4B
(59) 3T(
SUM SUM
4700 4700
100 100
O.KUM O.UUM
250 250
15600 B110
SUM SUM
• •
41100 27400
a •
3(0 360
210 210
1VO 190
C-lldu C-34
(550 41400
570 570
100 100
192) 421
4.90 4.90
4.70 B.7
12400 9500
34 268
200 200
27 3SM
•> •)
2(000 232000
• 211J
15800 7100
162 299
0.16UM 0.75M
250 278
12060) 5180
SUM SUM
• •
7490 (2100
• •
117) 360
210 117
15 119
R-10
S96
STO
100
121)
4.90
4.70
30700
(0
200
I20IM
f)
1180
ISOBI
O.KUM
|38|
|3100|
SUM
7.1UM
24200
10UM
360
l»l
190
C-39
21(0
570
100
1(9)
4.90
4.70
22000
20
200
Him
•
1760
SUM
12090)
61
O.KUM
131)
14140)
SUM
•
24700
•
42
210
19O
The result is greater than the Inili
.leas than the detection limit tequli
Data did not rwttt CPA quality a nun
R-ll R-12
7580 318
570 570
19 100
(68 |22|
4.90 4.90
7.9 4.70
128000 38200
7.80 7. 80
200 20O
Him |24|M
D 0
1(9000 259
SUM SUM
22400 470O
4*5 100
O.KUM O.KUM
|JA| 250
18000 |4141)
SUM SUM
7.IUM 7.1UM
IllOOO 14700
100UM 10UM
360 205
116) 210
220 51
R-ll
12(0
STO
loo
121)
4.9O
4. TO
54100
16
200
11M
1680
SUM
4700
O.KUM
250
(210
SUM
3580
160
128)
190
R-l 4
1190)
570
IOU
152)
4.9O
4. TO
15200
16
200
S8H
324
SUM
12190)
62
O.KUM
250
11540)
SUM
70(0
116
210
190
R-K
469
STO
1(9)
4.90
4kTO
22000
20
• V
5 mi
eaVU
Him
1760
SUM
(2090)
O.KUM
111)
14140)
SUM
24700
42
210
190
•unent detection limit, but
erl by the contract.
>nce requlremrnte.
reported.
-------
COM 1987
Caaftl* Location
R-l
R-2
R-U
R-U R>«
R-5
R-T
R-l R-t H-10 R-ll R-12 R-1I R-14 R-1C
Volatllaat
X^tone
Rentene
2-BuUnone
Chlorofom
1,2 DichloroeUwn*
tthylbeiuene
Hetfylene chlorite
4-nrUtyl-2-pentanoM
Toluene
1.1.1-Trlchloroetham
Total Bylenea
ReaJ-VbUtllMt
Beiwole Acid
bia| 2-Oiloioethyl )*thtr
bia(2-CthylheKyl Iphthalate
Icophoiant
4-Hfthylphenol
Mtenol
770
SOU
79J
SOU
SOU
SOU
SOU
1000
SOU
SOU
SOU
sou
71
100
100
100
100
1200
10
2000
2SOU
laoj
2 SOU
1601
1100
2SOO
2500
2 SOU
107
moo
2600
2*00
4'0
66000
25000
2SOOO
JSOOU
75000
15000
25000
29000
25000
25HOO
2so;o
6200U
21000
12600
12600
12600
1100
HA .
NA
NA
N*
NA
NA
NA
SOU
100
100
100
2000U
1000U
20000
1000U
10000
10000
10000
20000
10000
10000
10000
*ou
100
6J
lou
10U
100
100
su
lou
su
su
su
SU
100
so
SU
su
sou
100
10J
lou
100
100
S10
SOU
1000
500
sou
SOU
SOU
1000
sou
SOU
SOU
SOU
100,
100
100
100
100
ISO
su
19
su
su
SU
su
100
su
SU
su
sou
100
100
100
100
100
10U
SU
100
su
su
su
su
100
su
su
SU
sou
10U
100
100
100
100
10U
su
100
su
su
su
SU
100
SU
SU
SU
sou
100
100
lou
100
100
•00
250
21J
25U
250
250
2SO
2SU
2 Ml
2MJ
SOU
11
100
100
10U
100
saooo
2600J
6500J
sooou
14000
SOOOU
•BOO
106000
S700
SOOOU
SOOOU
54000
S5000
20000
1500
2900
26000
100
su
100
SU
SU
su
su
100
SO
SU
Su
SOU
10J
7J
100
100
10U
10U
su
100
su
su
su
su
lou
SU
SU
su
sou
100
9J
100
100
100
10U
su
100
SU
su
su
su
lou
su
su
su
sou
100
100
100
lou
10U
10U
su
10U
su
su
su
su
lou
su
SU
su
sou
100
100
100
100
100
(••pit location
C-J1 C-J2 C-ll C-JJAj C-J4
VblattUat
ActtOM
kcnxtna
2-feutanon*
OUorofom
1.2-Dlchloro*thim
tlhylbenitnt
HrUtylcne chlorite
4-H«Uiyl-2-i»ntajwnt
Tolucnt
l.l.I-TrlchloronhMM
lotal lylvnaa
•eal-VolatlUsi
Bentolc Acid
bit(2-OUororUiylUUttr
bi •( 2-Ctliylhciyl Iphthalatc
Icophoranr
4-Hrthylphenol
rhenol
10U
su
100
su
su
su
su
100
su
su
su
SOU
100
100
100
100
100
10U
su
100
su
su
su
su
lou
su
Su
SU
•J
lou
lou
10U
100
lou
.
10U
su
100
SU
Su
Su
SU
100
su
su
su
»J
100
100
100
100
10U
10U
su
lou
su
su
su
SU
100
su
SU
su
sou
100
100
100
100
100
10U
Su
100
Su
su
SU
su
100
su
su
SU
sou
100
100
loo
100
lou
100
su
lou
su
SU
SU
Su
100
SO
su
so
SOU
lou
100
100
100
100
Keys
J EttlMtvd value for • tentatively Identified eonpownd.
Nft Nr»t analyied for.
U rrnfxMiral wnt analysed for but not detected. Detection Halt reported.
• Ttirir c«m|o
-------
HELLS HITHIN CONTAIH*£NT SYSTE*
LOC K-2 K-2 K-3 K-3
SAS?LE I 13-1186 23 13-1187 24
CONTRACTOR MC JRB KKC JF.E
DATE SARFLESi1-16-81 8-12-B3 11-16-81 8-12-6!
UN!TS PPB PPB PPB PPB
VOlATILES
CAPS:1* D:SL'LrIDE
CHLSMHNIENE
DICH.2F.2ETHANE.1.2-
KETONES
NE CHiOFIDE
STTP.ENE
TETRA:K.Ot3ETH£l
-------
CO***!!
VO.ATILES
ACETONE
BENZENE
IMSSlBtflfiQRETHAHE
CARB3N DISU.F1DE
CHLORCSENZENE
CHLOR3ETHASE
CHLORIC"!1
D!CH:OR3ETKA«i£.!,l-
BICM.3ROETHANE,1,2-
Bi:HLOROETHYl£NE,TRANS-l,2-
BJCHLOROPPOPANE.1,2-
BJCHLOROPR2FENE.1.3-
ETHYLBENIENE
KTONEE
«ETHYL4-,-2-PENTAN:NE
KTHYLENE CHLORIDE
STYRENE
TETRA:HLOP:ETHENE
TOLUENE
CLO«0£TH*.NE,1,1,J-
LORSETHANE, 1,1,2-
.OP2ET-YLEN:
VINYL CHLORIDE
VIN
-------
JSA-FLE IDC C-IB C-IB CP-I CP-B
iSArrtE II 34 |t;3i
:COXTKA:TOR JRB JRB JRB COR
!t;TE W#-JU B-10-B3 12-10-B4 B-12-83 5-23-8!
: UNITS PPB PPB m PPB
CW?3J!CS
T HELLS
C-27 C-27\SC1L
BE541 BA913
con
5-2C-B5
PPB
con
5-29-85
PPB
C-29
con
5-22-B5
PPB
Ml
KI29
COR
5-23-8!
PPB
V:.«T::ES
CH.OF.:rDW.
t.'CtCSSTH
JICHlOSSETMAKE,!,:-
KETON-S
HE7HYLEN: CH.O^DE
STYRENE
TETRA:H.OR:ETHE«
TD^UEKE
TRICHlORDETHANE.J.l.l-
TRIXBRJETHAK, '1,1,2-
TF.:CK:OR3ETHYLENE
VINYL CHLDfilOE '
VINMBENE CH.ORIDE
IYLENE5 (TOTAL)
220C 1690 2400
300 f4
4!
72C
760
450C
300
2400
5COC
35000
ioc:
2J
7B
190 6U
1EO 95.1
2010 BICO 38
42
1700
3SO
B3CC
BE::
::: 3*::: isoj
21
2J
6J
2J
2J
3J
SER1V3LAT1LES
A:EN;»HTKYLENE
BEN:C(IIPYRENE
llS(-2-CM:Ofi3tT«IY)ETHt»u
B!S(-2-CH:OR3tTK3ir)H£TNAN:
llS(-2-CHLOR3£THYL)ETHER
B!S(2-ETHYLHEIYL)PHTHA:ATE
• BL'TYLKKIYLPKTHALATE
140000 5700 58000
56000 6900 270SO
ts
2JOJ
II-H-OCTY: PHTHALATE
»ICHiOft:SE«EKE,l,4-
B1ETHYLPHTHALATE
FLUQRdNTHENE
FLUORENE
NAPTHALEN:
PHENANTHP.ENE
PHENOL
PYREKE
220J
210
210
5300
71
2000
-------
VDLAT1I.ES
ACETONE
BENlENi-
BWM'QR*
CARBON BISULFIDE
CHLOR:SEN:ENE
CK:2R3£THME
CH.L3?.3fC?«
BlCHLOMETHANE.l.l-
B1CHLOR3ETHANE.1,2-
BI CHLOR3ETHYLENE. TRANS- 1. ?•
BICMLDR2*P.3'A«|£,1,2-
B1CHLO'3PR3FEH£.1,3-
FTHYLBEN:ENE
KETONES
HETHYLENE CH.O&1SE
STYRENE
TOL'JEK!
TBTPM* nonrTufiyr i t t«
^KICHLORSETHANEJ'u-
Pniru' flcnfTuy PUC
VINYL CHLORIDE
V»« 1DENE CHLORIiE '
JYLENiiS (TOTAL!
SERIVOLATILES
ACENftf'HTHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
BEN::UIPYRENE
BISI-2-CM.OPCETH3IYIETHANE
B!S(-2-CHLOROETH3IY)flETHAJi£
BIS(-2-CHLCR2ETHYL)ETHER
BI£'2-ETHYLHEIYL)PH,THALATE
BL'TYuJESlYL^THALATE
CU'iNE
Bl-N-BL'^riPHTHALATE
BI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
BIETMYLPKTHALATE '
FltMANTHENE *
FLUOItENE
HETHYLPHEN3L.4-
NAFTHALENE
PHENftNTHRENE
MN3L
tf.lC^3W£.«L.2,4.t-
DO»H:S;:iEWT NELLS
A-.PLE LOC CP-2 CP-2 - CP-7 C-4A C-22
A«PLE 1 33 BB!!: 18
ONTRA:TQP. JRB JRB CDR «»: JP.B
AT£ SARPLEt 8-12-8! 12-10-84 5-31-8! 6-16-81 8-10-8! 1
UNITS PPB PPB PPB PFB PPB
24fC 280C 3770 1100
21
•
1M 72
78 785 62
!:?" 11500 65
200 200
HOC 1770 2200
i:ofc i4o?r i!3?C'
'•••* * B •' • 1 '\ % •
*
724?
MOO:: 61000 11:000 47000
*
7100? 240000 2?0 BS'OO 26000
14
r.
27 83 72
30 2J 41
34
22000 21000 10100 38
6J
C-22
JRB
2-10-84
PPB
250
1100
410C
7700
-------
VOLATILE!
ACETONE
CAPB2* riSL'LHDE
CHLOP2ETHA*-
OISHlGfiaETMNE.M-
JICHLORSETHME.l.:-
B1CHLORDETHYLENE,TP,ANH,2-
DICHLOROBB.0BANE,S.2-
BICHLOROPR2BENE,1,3-
KETONES
fl£TH»L«-,-2-PEHTAH2NE
fl£THYL£NE CHLOPIIE '
STYP.ENE
TETFA:HL3P.2ETHENE
TO.'JENE
TRICH.OR2ETHA*i.M,l-
TRi:H.3R2£THAN£.l,l,2-
VINYL CHLORIDE
VJNY.IDEtiE CHLORIDE
IYLENE5(TCTA.)
SEKJVDLATILES
AKTHBACENE
B£N!2;i)?YP.ENE
BIS!-2-CwLOBOETH2lY)£THASE
BlS'-2-CH,OP2ETH:ir:flETHA'i£
B!S!2-ETHYLHEJYL)PHTHALATE
B'JULBENIYLPHTHALATE
CUfENE
Bl-X-B'JTTLPHTHALATE
BI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
Ji:HLOB25E«EN£,l,2-
B1CHLOP.2BENIENE.1.4-
BIETHYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE '
FLUOP.ENE
nETHYLPHENOL,4-
UAPTHALEHE
FHENANTHRENE
PHENOL
PYP.ENE
TH:HLDB.3PHENDL,2,4,6-
£NT HELLS
SAHFLE LOC Ml Ml C-24 CP-3 CP-3 C-7 C-7
SA«LE i 36 is 32 37
CONTRACTOR WC JRB r JRB JP.B JRB MC JRB
DATE SARPLE8 6-16-81 8-12-83 8-12-8! 8-12-8! 12-10-84 6-16-81 B-12-B3
WITS PPB PPB PPB PFB PPB PPB PPfc
?er
9''
97
2Ce:
4!
7C
32
SB
4!C 1400
240
12C
300
230
660
5E
400
7«0
120
15C
220C
11BC 17.C-:
370 6!C
140 9! 9:i 4470
400
46:::
38CTC 130CC 1600C 2700
4900 J300C WOt t°0?
37CCC
190
62
89
14
62
260 790 13400
-------
IIPMI UHttU.
SMUN5 LIERTim
SRMU MMCI
OM1RRCIM.
OflHSmO
wire
CMUMS
INETflLS
1
IflUMINM
MA
It
)n
M?-U
•I/I
I IH. Itol*
1
1
IN,*.
mis Nimra oMraiMfiir EVSIDI
c-ej
l(
JRI
I-IO-U
•I/I
i m.Mi
1
1
IN.A,
IRNTIIOff 1(0.201*) KO.MI
iMsmc M 0.011 KO.OII
IWIIM 1 HA,
1 IN.A.
IKRnilW II0.05IW l(0.«ll
ItnONIIN 10.0131 HO.CII
ICRLCIIM
ICMDIIM
icaenr
(dm*
IIRDN
IUOO
iworsiw
iwwnrsE
itvom
INIWO.
IPOinSSftM
ISElDtll*
ISIIVO
ISOOIM
IIHPU.IIM
HIM
ivnrann
IIIW
1
ICVMIOC
HHMIS
IWRCTH1
-------
IIPMI UMFIU.
9PWUN5 LOCRTHM
smfNMEfl
X
UWIWM.IM
M1ESMU1
WITS
ONUNS
iNnms
1
IMLWINM
ircwoifur mis
c-«
27
JW
t-12-ftl
t'\
•
• m.Noii
1
1
III
H-3
•
JW
0-10-43
n/l •
I IFt.ttAt
1
1
III
c-a
12
jit
I-IO-U
•I/I
t
1 IFI.IMt
1
1
III
IKUS UIIHIN OHTNIWOT SYSTEM
e-13
7
m
0-10*1
n/i
•
I IFt.Notff
1
1
III
inaiKxr 110.021 110.20110 110,20110 110.20110
IMSCNIC 10.01(1 MO.OIIW M 0.01 110 II 0.01 1
IIMIIM 1 Hfc
1 III
III 1 III
IK*nj.llM 110.091 110.081 1(0.031 II0.09IW
ICMMItM M 0.011 MO. 01 110 1(0.011 1(0.011
ICAdlM III
lOflWIW l.i I
lawu 111
1 III
10.0351
III
1 III 1 III
1 0.37 1 1 0.21 1
1 III 1 III
ICWa 0.0471 M 0.021 1(0.021 1(0.021
IIMM III
1 III
1 III 1 III
IIK» 0.0711 H0.02I M 0.021 110.021
INOCSIIM III
IMWtnOE III
1 III
1 III
1 III 1 III
1 III 1 III .
IKRCUiy 1(0.0011 1(0.0011 10.00101 1(0.0011
MOO. 1(1031 1(0.051 10.06* 1 10.121
ipotnssnn i 111
1 III
1 III 1 III
(SODOM MO.OIIW 1(0.011 KIOIIM 1 IM>
ISIIVM 110.011 . .1(0.011 1(0.011 1(0.011
ISODIW III
infuiw *.n i
"IN HI
IWWVUM IN.M.
Ill* 0.111
1 1
inmioE (O.OH M
inrwis 0.201
IHKXin SOLIDS III
1 III
MO. OHM
III
III
O.OKI
1
10.01110
0.171
III
1 III 1 III
M 0.101 II 0.01 IND
III 1 III
III 1 III
0.0251 1 0.0*61
1 1 1
10.011 MO.OIIW
0.10 1 1 I.J 1
III 1 III
C-17
NIC
in
0-10-41
*
1 in.Notr
N
0
'
1
E
r
N
I
S
'
II
M
M
I
»
S
1
S
_
'
C-J
MK
we
1-14-41
t
I IFI.IMt
M
0
1
S
t~n
me
m
0-10-41
A
I IFI.Mt
N
0
N
E
r
N
I
S
II
N
II
I
f
S
1
S
c-ioa
me
uc
i-lt-41
0 IFt.Wt
C-IOA
B
tn
0-12-41
•I/I
•
0 IFI.Nbl«
1
1
III
1 0.20110
0.0231
III
(0.031
0.01(1
III
3.1 1
III
0.0301
III
O.OJ2I
III
III
0.00111
0.11 1
III
ioni
0.0131
III
10.101
III
IN. I
l.?l
1
( 0.011
0.23 1
III
c-w
ioc
uc
Hl-OI
•~^H^ I^^M^HB
0 IFI.IMff
N
0
N
E
T
a
i
s
i
s
-------
k>
SWUNG urarim
SPNPU NMER
BATE SNUB •
(MIIS
DMQMD5
INHflLS
1
IAUMMM
IRNTINDff
IMSCNIC
IBMIM
IBEmiltM
IORONIW
ICnLCIIM
IOMNIM
ICON.?
ICOTEI
IIKON
IICAD
iwncsnn
INRNBRNESE
INfRCMV
•woo.
ipotflssnn
isamiw
(SILVER
ISOOIIM
imuiw
II IN
IWMVIUI
IIINC
1
ICVRNIOE
IMmS
I9JSPTNXO 90LIDS
1
I —
LIPflNI UHFIU. ^RB
0-3
*
ja
•-I2-M
•1/1
1
0 IFUNott
|
I
IIA,
( 0.20IN9
0.091
lift.
(O.OSI
0.01(1
lift,
3.* 1
lift.
0.0431
lift.
0.0401
lift.
lift.
0.001(1
0.0921
lift.
( O.OIINB
0.0111
lift.
10.101
lift.
lift.
O.S
(0.01
0.80
11
me
m
_•_
•
1
'
. ,. ..
N
0
N •
r
1
A
I
3
A
N
A
L
r
I
I
s
C-7
me
uc
(-K-OI
I
_
1 •
IFI.Natt
N
0
C-7
37
JM
l-«-§3
•I/I
•
0 IFI.IMf
1
1
lift.
OntdWOIENT IBIS
33
tn
•-I?M
•I/I
(
1 (Ft. Holt
1
I
IN. A.
(0.201 110.201
0.0131 l( 0.011
IIA. 1 IN. I
(0.03INO 1(0.031
0.0171
III
i.( i
IIA.
0,10 1
III
0.0301
III
III
(O.OOIIN9
0.11 1
III
0.19 I
0.0171
III
( 0.101
III
III
0.23 1
9 1
110.011
1 0.17 1
1 III
1 1
I .
O.OJII
IN. A.
17.3 1
IN. A.
0.05SI
IN. ft.
0.0771
IN. A.
IN. A.
(0.001 IND
0.19 1
lift.
.0.02(1
0.0201
lift.
( 0.101
lift.
IIA.
0.33 1
1
1 O.Oll
(.( 1
IN. A.
1
.
CP^
me
m
12-10-04
*
1 IFI.NoU
N
0
CP-7
NM779
ON
5-31-W
•f/l
m
9 IFI.NoU
t
31
1?
3ft
l(0.4|
1(4.31
124000
1 477
1(141
•
•
1140
(200
•
t
394
(44201
•
•
•
II
JIU
17 IU.R
(141 1
• 1
1
• 1
III
IIA.
1
.
C-«A C-22
me to
HC MB
(-11-61 0-IO-43
•I/I
I^B " *
1 IFt.Notr I IFI.Notv
1
1
N IIA.
0 110.201
MO. Oil
N 1 IN. A.
C M0.05IND
f II A.OII
A m. A,
L 0.74 1
S III
O.OMI
IIA.
0.0321
IN.A,
III
(O.ooi IND
0.101
1 lift.
S M 0.011
M 0.011
1 lift.
II 0.101
lift.
lift.'
0.131
1
1 0.011
0.79 1
III
1
1
•L
C-22
me
m
12-10-84
1
1 IFI.Mff
.
•^^•a^^
N
0
N
C
f
A
L
S
A
N
A
L
V
S
1
9
-------
SNUB locnnm
SKUMMCI
•
•
iuiii*4.llM
MTESmO
IMITS
CMPdMS
HCT&S
1
IRUMIIUI
IflNTIIOff
IMSENIC
iiwiiiM
IKWniltM
IOXMIM
IttLCIM
IOOVMIIN
ICDHflLT
iomi
IIIRM
lt£M
IMROCSIIM
IMMBHCSE
\ivaan
iHioa.
IPOIASSIUI
1 SODOM
isiLVEi
ISDIIK
ITHUIIM
ITIH
iwMvnn
IIIIC
1
ICYPHIK
IPtfKLS
istmMO nun
1
1
IIPMI UMFIU.
DOMETOIENT HliS
C-ll
me
J»
I-IO-U
i m.M»
«MW»_
'
.
C-ll
IDC
jn
IMO-M
»
1 IFI.Nblt
.^^*"^
N
0
N
I
1
A
L
1
A
N
II
L
»
•
1
1
HM
M
M
l-IO-*3
I/I
1 IFt.Ml
•
1
1
IN. A.
10.201
O.M7I
IN.N.
10. (61
•.OUI
lift.
3I.« 1
IN. ft.
•.20 1
IN. A,
O.VI
IN.A, '
IN. A,
O.OOWI
0.70 1
lift,
O.OCTI
CM
IH77I
OM
WJ-C
I/I
0 iM.IMt
•
fin
43
1060
10
9.2
S3000
108
ra.5i
•
•
•
17800
3U
t
103
99ZO
•
O.OMI IH.«
1
1
INLft. IIOJOOOI
0.24 1 10 IU
IN.ft. 17 IU.I
IN. A. tlOl 1
1.3 1 11 1
1 1
10.011 I 1
7.1 1 IN. A,
IN.A. IN.A.
1 1
C-27
wtm
CM
W1-BS
«^/l
• iri.Ngtt
i
i
• i
31 IU
li.1l 1
• 1
3.3 1
4 IU
29000 1
IK 1
4 IU
• 1
• 1
• 1
136*011
• 1
• 1
• 1
1471011
• 1
• 1
• 1
I IU
I7IU.I
72 1
• 1
1
• 1
IN. A.
IN. A,
1
C-«7
MIC
CM
3-20-a
• IFt.teU
C-29
M8800
CM
3-22-«
VI
I IFt.Nott
*
1
1
• 1
31 IU
3 lit,!
11921 1
110.31 1
1
1
4 IU
C-31
NN773
CM
S-M-83
•4/1
1 IFt.Nolt
,
1
1
• 1
31 IU
3 IU.I
1711 1
0.3 IU
4 IU
957001 131700 1
IK II 119.41 II
4 IU 4 III
t •
f t
• •
142001 1340
44 199
t •
77 IC8.91
14(4011 11279011
• 1 • 1
J IU 3 IU
303001 9510 1
10 IU 4 IU
17 IU.I 17 1(1,1
4 IU 4 IU
• 1 • 1
1 1
• 1 •!
IN. A. IN. A.
IN.A. IN.A.
r i
-------
FOOTNOTES
JRB DATA EPA S&A DATA
N.A. Not Analyzed N.A. Not Analyzed
NO Not Detected ND Not Detected
A Approximate Value
WWC DATA
N.A. Not Analyzed
CD* DATA
N.A. Not Analyzed
U Element was analyzed for but not detected. Reported with the
detection limit value (e.g. 10U).
R Spile S8~:'e recovery is not within control limits.
[ ] Result is greater th*' or equal to Instrument detection limit but
less than the contract required detection limit.
* Data did not pass EPA quality assurance.
(*) Duplicate analysis is not within control limits.
REFERENCES
Environmental Protection Agency Surveillance and Analysis (EPA S4A), 8/79.
Scientific Applications International Corporation (formerly JRB Associates,
Inc.) (JRB), Long Term Remeoial Action Monitoring Program, LiPari Waste
Disposal Site, Priority Pollute*. Sampling - 8/83.
•
Woodward-Clyde Consultants, Inc. (WWC), Project Summary for 1981, Ground-
water Chemistrj ana Monitoring Well Installation (March 1981), LiPari Waste
Disposal Site.
Camp Dresser 2 McKee Inc. (COM), Remedial Investigation Data, 2/85-7/85.
-------
l>
// «
"
*//
.*/'
C-35
C-35
|IM ORCHARD)
• Cutting
100 0 100 WO
C-37 S
(??«'NORTHWFSTI ~
I i.»«».?oo
Monitoring Wnll
locations
-------
HUD
|nu|$ai(Q
-------
N
400
*m»y-VrV^s
-------
Potential
Area of
leachate
Seepage
SW-09
Alcyon r.rk St'09
sailing site
i Surface water, sampling site
> Sedl*»nt grab and boring sampling site
•OOP 0
Stale " rVel
COM I9RS
Stream Grab and Lake Grab/Boring
Sampling Sites
LiPnrl Landfill. Glmiceslnr County. Now Jeisry
-------
SW-27
SE-27
rwt
SW SwlM* W«l«f
SC SUM* S^bntnt «nd L«k« Cor»
900
500
Seal*
COM 1985/1986
Lake and Stream Surface Water, Stream Sediment and Lake Core Sampling Sites
LiPari landfill. Gloucester County. New Jersey
-------
LIPARI LANDFILL SITE
PITMAN, NJ
COMPREHENSIVE SAHPLING
•*• LIMITED SAMPLING
ty WETLAND
WATERBDDY
PAVED ROAD
-—DIRT ROAD
• 305 METERS i
1000 TECt
FPA/ERT MARCH 1988
-------
ATTACHMENT C
QUALITATIVE SUMMARY OF COMPOUNDS
DETECTED IN THE ON-SITE LIPARI
LANDFILL AND IN OFF-SITE AREAS
-------
QUALITATIVE SUMMARY OF COMPOUNDS DETECTED ON-SITE & OFF-SIVE LIPARI AREAS
iTILES
COMPOUND
CHLORCME7HXCS
BROMOMETHANE
VINYL CHLORIDE
CHLOROETJftNE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
ACCTCfJE
CARBON DISULFIDE
1 . 1-DICHLOROETHENE
1 , l-DICHLOROETHAtJE
1.2-DICHLOSOETHENS
CHLOROFORM
1.1.l-'TRICHLORCETHANE
CARBOS TETRACHLORIDE
VINYL ACETATE
BRO-CDICHLORCMETHANE
1,2-DICHLOROPROPENE
cis-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENT
TRICHLOROETHENT:
DIBROMOCHLOROKETWtfE
1,1,2-TRICH
(LTS-1 , 3-TRICKLORO£TKA::S
DRM
4-MEWYL-2-PC?TANOKE
TETRACHLOROETHDZ
1.1.2. 2-TEPTRACHLOROE7HE-
TOLUEN"E
CHLOROBESZENE
ETWLBC3ENE
STYPEJE
2-CHLOROETHYL VINYL ETHER
C3ALJCyL BEN2E3:
CgALKANE
C7ALKANE
CflALKANE
FREON--.12
CN-SITE
COHANSEY
SOIL
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
r
X
X
X
k.*^
X
X
X
X
X
R x
WAT
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
OFF-SITE
CNSY KWOOD
WAT WAT
X
X X
X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X X
X
X X
X
X X
X
X X
X
X X
FARSH
SOIL LEA
X
X
X
X X
X X
X X
X
X X
X X
X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X X
X
X
X X
X X
X X
X X
AIR
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
•
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
CHNT BR R RUN ALCYON RES:22.T:>:
SED WAT SEDWAT SED WAT AIR AIR
X X
X
XX XX XX X
XX XX XXX X
X
X
X X
X
XX XX
XXX XXX
X XX
X
XX XX XX X-
•X
X
X X
XX XX XXX X
X X XX
X
X XX
X X
X
KEY:
CNSY- Cohansey Aquifer
KWOOD-Kirkwood Aquifer
MARSH-Chestnut Branch Marsh
R RUN-Rabbit Run
ALCYON-Alcycn Lake
CHNT BR-Oiestnut branch stream
WAT-Water sample
LEA-Leachate sartple
AIR-Air sa,Tiple
-------
QUALITATIVE SUEMARY OF OCMPOUNPS PETECTEP ON-S1TE & OFF-SITE LIPAR1 AREAS
SSKI-VOLATILE
COXPOJSD
OFF-SITE
QJSY KHOOD MARSH CHOT BR R RUN ALCYDN RESIDES1
SOIL WAT WAT WAT SOIL LEA AIR SEP WAT SEP HAT SEP WAT AIR AIR
PHENOL
bis (2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
2-CHLOROPHENOL
1. 3-DICHLOROBENZENE
1 , 4-DICHLOROSE:ZENT
BENZYL ALCOHOL
1 , 2-DICHLOROBESZENE
2-METHYL PHENOL
bis (2-CHLOR01SOPROPVL)ETHER
4-METHYL PHENOL
N-SITROSO-PI-JJ-PROPYLAMI>E
HEXACHLOROETHASE
2-SITROPKDOL
2,4-DIMETHYL PHENOL
ES^ZQIC ACIP
bis (2-CHLOROETHOW)ETHASE
2, 4-PICHLOROPHENOL
1,2, 4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
NAPHTHALENE
4-CHLOROA.-;iLINE
HEXACHLOROB'JTAPIEM:
4-CHLORO-3-METHYL PHENOL
2-METHYL 5WPHTKALENE
HEXACHLOROCYOOPENT.ADIES
2,4, 6-TRlCHLOROPHE:OL
2,4, 5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2-CHLOROtAPHTHALENE
2-NlTRQWaLIN'E
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE . ''
3-NITROASALISE
ACENAPHTHENE
2,4-DINTTROPHENOL
4-NITROPHEWL
2 , 4-PINrrROTOUJECE
2, 6-PINITROTOLUDI
PIETHYL PHTHALATE
FLOURENE
4-S1TRQRNIUNE
4 , 6-PINITRO-2-4
-------
QUALITATIVE SUMMARY OF COMPOUNDS DETFCTED ON-SITE & OFF-SITE LIPARI AREAS
SEMI-VOLATILJES CN-SITE
OOHANSEY
COMPOUND SOIL WAT
DI-N-BUTYL PHTHAIATE
FUXJRANTHENE
PYRENE
B1JTYLBENZYL PHTHAIATE
3,3' -DICHLOROBENZENE
B ENZO ( a ) ANTHRACENE
BIS ( 2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHAIATE
CHRYSENE
DI-N-OCTYL PHTHAIATE
BENZO(b)FLOURANTHENE
BENZO(k) FLOURANTHENE
BENZO(a)PYRENE
INDENO(l,2.3-cd)PYRENE
DIBENZO(a,h ) ANTHRACENE
BENZQ(g,h, i JPERYLENE
INORGANIC
ARSENIC
BARIUM
BERYLLIIM
CADMItJM
CHRCMIUM
COPPER
LEAD
MERCURY
NICKEL
SELENIIM
SILVER
TIIALI1M
VANADUM
/INT'
X X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X X
X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X
X X
X X
X X
OFF-SITE
OMSY KWOOD
WAT WAT
x
x
x x
X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
y x
MARSH
CHNT BR
SOIL IFA AIR SED WAT
X X
X X
X X
X
X X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X X
x x,
X X
X X
X X
X X
X
X X
X X
x x
X X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X X
. X X
X X
X X
X
X X
x X
X
X
X X
X X
R RUN ALCYON RESIDENTIAL
SED WAT SED
XXX
x x
x x
x
x x
XXX
x x
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X X
X X
XXX
XX X
XXX
XXX
XX X
XXX
XX X
X X
X X
XXX
XXX
WAT AIR AIR
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
-------
ATTACHMENT D
GEOLOGIC PROFILES
-------
u • :•
:>':..:
i s ::-.:•:!•-.
ii-:£»i
I' — . lf»:t»:
•;..-ik£
:! ».f. !£»:£»«
»!••*:•. 3»:r-£»£
Ti::-.at:«--ts8
•.•.••'•.•:-.3«:c'-»<
•.'.«•••::•. 3»:r-«i
•.••:::-.j»:r-*«£
:::-.:•?•£•••»£
*.••:::••*(
•:i"M
»£•••. :s:t.'-. »£•
••£:»••:
6;
2
13 Bl>4 Di •«
3 Bl«' Bl>*
6 C.<2 B;*2
5P •> !*• •)
&••< £••<
3. C.«v c.«v
•: c.«J e.-«3
*? 4J J *• J
1. c.». ;,.,
i: c.o c.«3
VIk
•v:.
C3k:.
(BK.
0..'
B.'i
B.-e
Bi'i
ei>2:
ot.ie
61*.
Ok«2
Pl>4
p.il
6, .«
• •2
8k*]
4j J
8;*«
0>>3
•2 w£.
•v;. ».;
ee»:. ::»:
(DC:: (;::.
:.«• :.«•
D..S :.•'.
t.'t :.•:
Bi..5 :.>!
s:«2: :.«;:
Bi«'8 :..••
Bl>4 C.«.
01.2 :..!
C."i B...
B;«' :.••
c..2 :.•<
B[|!. :;[!.
C.'3 :.-3
Ji . J« .
e»«« :.«-
e.o :.»:
1
::•:.
;=ct
. t *
.•««.
.•'.
."!
.«::
..•;'
.*•
.«<
.«-
..•
.•i
.*<
.•:
3: .
.»•
..:
$*•! U-! S.-J S. -
k: lie:*; is iicu: «: »£«::i.; »:•£«:
4.:. MS. MS. MS. si:
c.. csk:. co»:. o:. ::••:
(DOC: (pee) (one: (or.*.- (si:.
t:!:2-:>.s«:t"*'.) t**f* 6 c.*e o.«t c.«s c.>:
itx:i«t • « o.-« oi..* e..« :.*:
(•••i «l»:t»t 4t B..4S 0..45 C...5 C...'.
•:.^iki 2«- s:: • it: • t..2r «.:: •
:3 ».t». uoikt 3: Ow>3: D.O: c.*i: :.•::
•i-r«.a»a-«i»i »5 e.«-5 " :-•*.» e.«u e..-«
>3f«kkl 1} Bl"15 Bl«15 6l«'S B;«'5
.E 3: B..JC oi-jo Bi*3: :.*3:
20 P;*29 BI.JO c.*2: ' :.•?:
»:£•>£ 263 Bl>26: Pl>263 B;*26: :.«2t:
•f-'. l*5iJ": C£1>1 1S Bi'lS 6i»l5 Ol«U t.«'i
>|f>k.12 11 Bi'll 8:«11 Cl.il C;>n
ect • »nrs
ots. o:. •
• • ««:«j» vnufs oisiirt: u^.f 5" DPC
pgp . HITS »!• •IlllOk-
-------
LEGEND
• LAKC SURFACE SAMPLE
LAKE SURFACE HEADSPACE SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND NUMBERS
LIPARI LANDFILL. PITMAN. N.J.
-------
LEGEND
—•• — FINCI
o LANDFILL AlH V(NT
LlACMATI STMIAM IMANATING
MOM •*$! OF LANDFILL
CIUANIIMINT
•$• OFF-IITI yONlTOHINC WILL
• LIACMATI NlAOSFACE SAMFcI
ZONE IV-LEA2
ZONE JV-LEA3
i
\ ZONt ^.
~T<»i2-
ONE VI-LEA2
ONE VI-LEA1t^_V X I
ZONE VI-LEA3
\
LEACHATE HEADSPACE AND AIR VENT
GRAB SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND NUMBERS
LIPARI LANDFILL, PITMAN. N.J.
-------
Cample location
Aluminum
Antimony
Araenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Ch ionium
Cobalt •
Copper
Cymnide
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
thallium
Tin.
Vanadium
tine
Sample location
Aluminum
Antimony
Araenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chromium
Cobalt
Copper
Cyanide
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
tine
R-l
5)5
570
100
11251
4.90
4.70
50000
7.eu
200
|20|ft
10J
1)400
1)2601
179
0.161*
2W1
9180
Son
?e tUR
6140
)60
210
215
C-29
10)8
500
50
(96 IH
6
•0)00
27
100
100
100
•285
•
146001
'194
0.20
300
|3600|
50
61
21700C
SO
400
26
'
R-2
388
STO
100
|196|
4.90
4.70
6000
7.00
200
140ft
\\3
21600
Sun
S560
US
C.16UM
250
|lion|
It*
•
13900
360
aio
128
C-29 00
141S
SOU
su
I06N
ati*
1
7*100
6$
100
100
100
•574
•
10000
197
0.20
30U
1)6001
SU
165
2)900e
SU
400
70
R-3A R-4
388 241
STU STU
100 100
1610 450
4.90 4.90
64 4. TO
62000 54200
10 7.00
20U 200
140ft 140ft
• •
I04ooo eosoo
1040J •
42600 14800
1240 446
0.16UH- 0.160ft
45 250
•360 5710
SUN Vm
• •
1)2000 6060
360 360
|23| 21U
35300 190
CDH
R-S
140U
STU
100
1421
4.90
4. TO
9640
7.60
200
140ft
41
41SOO
1987
R-6
11161
STO
100
I86|
4.90
4. TO
2)200
7.80
2C«J
14Uft
•
12)00
SUft •
11250) 2290
)ll 25-7
0.16UM 0.160ft
250
2060
Sim
•
45100
360
210
190
ftajflple location C-31
Antiaony
Araenic
Beryllium
Cadmium
Calcium
Chronlum
Cobalt
Copper
Cyanide
Lead
Magnrsltav
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Potassium
Selenium
Cilver
Sodium
Thallium
Tin
Vanadium
" V t*t*»
& inc
12)0
STO
100
191 J
4.90
4.70
19600
7.00
200
140ft
•
11200
•
•180
17)
0.16UR
250
120601
SOft
•
S450
•
)60
210
ipfj
250
0)10
Soft
•
4510
360
210
91
C-32
3010
570
100
(1051
4.90
4. TO
20400
10
200
140R
•
22400
•
1))00
)46
0.160K
250
|2060|
SUft
•
12600
•
(371
21U
19U
J estimated value for a tenatlvely Identified compoura). II
M Indicates spike sanple recovery vaa not within control limits.
U Coppound was analyzed foi but not detected. Detection limit •
R-7
140
STO
100
1200)
4.90
4. TO
38500
7.80
. 200
14UR
•
74200
(21801
911
0.16UM
25U
12500
SUM
•
148101
36U
21U
95
C-33
76)0
STU
100
1991
4.90
4. TO
10600
41
200
140ft
•
28100
•
15800
161
0.16UM
))
(20601
SON
•
9580
•
)60
210
» J
«-0 R-9 R-10 R-ll
S2S S94 596 7580
STU STU STU STU
100 10U 100 19
(61 1 |)8) |21| 668
4.90 4.90 4.9O 4.9O
4. TO 24 4.70 7.9
116000 01100 30700 128000
7.80 1) 60 7.80
200 200 200 200
14UR 140N |20]M 140ft
• • a •
(59) 376 1110 169000
SUM SUM •Sun
4700 4700 (S08| 22400
100 100 (12| 4«S
0.160ft 0.16UN 0.160M 0.16UH
250 250 ()8| |2A|
15600 1)10 |)100| 18000
SUft SUM SUN SUM
• • 7.1UN 7.1UR
4)100 27400 24200 11)000
36U 36U 360 360
210 21U |2)| |)6|
1VU 190 190 220
C-))du C-34 C-39
6550 41400 2160
570 STU STU
100 100 100
|92| 421 (69)
4.90 4.90 4.90
4. TO 0.7 4.70
12400 9500 22000
)4 268 20
200 200 200
27 35N 140M
4» A> •
26000 2)2000 1760
• 21U SOft
15600 7)00 (20901
162 299 6)
0.16UM 0.75ft 0.160ft
250 278 (311
(2060| 5180 (41401
SUft SOft SUft
• • •
7490 62100 24700
• • •
()7| 360 42
210 117 210
)S 1)9 19U
R-12
310
570
100
I22|
4.90
4.70
38200
7.60
200
|24|*
•
259
SUH
4700
too
0.16UM
250
(414)|
Soft
7.1UH
14700
205
21U
51
•me result Is greater than the Inttruwnt detection
lets than the detection limit i«|ulird by the contra
Data d»d not f»*» CPA quality enuiance lequlreBrnl*
R-l)
1260
STU
100
4.90
4.70
54)00
16
200
31ft
0
1680
SUN
4700
ID)
0.16UN
250
62)0
SUft
3560
360
(28|
190
limit, but
Cl •
R-l 4
I190|
STO
loo
(521
4.90
4. TO
15200
16
200
58ft
324
suft
(21901
62
0.160ft
250
(1S40|
SUM
7060
1)6
210
190
R-16
469
STU
10U
1691
1 W V
4.90
22000
20
20O
e>VW
14UM
1760
SUM
(2090|
6)
O.I6UR
1)11
(41401
SUft
24700
42
21U
19U
reported.
-------
1987
location
R-l
R-l
R-tt
R-U R-«
R-S
R-7
R-t R-10 R-ll R-12 R-1I R-14 R-16
Volatlleai
KMtont
•ensene
2-Butanone
Chloroform
1,2 Dlchloroetfwm
Cthylbentene
Hethylene chloride
4-Hethyl-2-pentanone
Toluene
1,1.1-Trlchloroetham
Total jrylenea
•raJ-VDlatlleai
Beniolc Acid
bU(2-Chloroethyl (ether
bia(2-CUiylhexyl Iphthalat*
laophorane
4-Htthylphenol
Phenol
770
SOU
79J
SOU
SOU
SOU
SOU
1000
SOU
SOU
sou
sou
71
10U
100
100
100
1200
10
aooo
2500
180J
160J
1100
2500
2500
2500
167
MOO
260U
2fOO
4-n
66000
25000
25000
J5000
35000
2500U
JSOOO
29000
JSOOO
2500Q
j JO i*0
6200U
21000
12600
12600
1260U
1100
NA . 20000
NA 10000
N* 20000
NA 10000
NA 1000U
NA 10000
NA 10000
NA 20000
NA 10000
NA 10000
NA 10000
sou sou
• 100
10U «J
100 100
10U 100
• 100
10U
su
100
su
su
SU
SU
10U
su
su
Su
sou
100
10J
100
100
100
S10
SOU
1000
SOU
SOU
SOU
SOU
Iboo
SOU
SOU
SOU
sou
100
100
100
100
100
ISO
su '
19
su
su
su
su
100
SU
SU
su
sou
100
100
100
100
100
10U
Su
10U
su
su
Su
Su
100
su
su
SU
sou
100
100
100
lou
100
10U
SU
100
su
su
su
SU
100
SU
su
Su
sou
100
100
lou
100
100
600
250
2JJ
250
25U
250
2Su
3MJ
2MI
2MJ
SOU
11
lou
100
too
100
58000
2600J
6500J
SOOOU
14000
sooou
eaoo .
106000
S700
sooou
SOOOU
54000
S5000
20000
1500
2900
26000
100
su
100
SU
su
su
SO
100
Su
su
SO
SOU
lou
7J
100
10U
lou
100
Su
100
su
su
su
su
lou
su
su
su
sou
100
9J
100
100
10U
100
su
too
SU
su
SU
SU
lou
su
SU
su
sou
100
100
100
100
100
10U
su
100
su
su
su
su
100
su
su
su
sou
100
100
100
100
100
,
(Mplt location
C-ll C'J2 C-ll C-
C-14
VblatlUat
Acctom
•«ni*nt
2-ftutancn*
OUorofora
1.2-DlchlotettlHm
Cthylbrnitnt
KrUiylcne chlorld*
4 -M» Uiy 1 -2-pcnUnont
Tolucnt
l.l.l-TrichlorcMt>w>iw
Total ryl«n«*
•••1-VblatllcBi
Bentolc Acid
bi •( 2-Chloioethyl Itther
bii(2-Cthylhcicyi (phthalate
Itophorane
4-nrthylpttenol
rhenol
10U
SU
100
su
su
su
su
lou
su
su
su
sou
100
10U
100
100
100
10U
su
10U
su
su
su
su
100
su
su
SU
•J
lou
lou
100
100
100
.
10U
su
100
SU
Su
Su
su
100
su
Su
su
fj
100
loo
lou
lou
10U
10U
su
lou
su
su
su
SU
100
SU
su
su
SOU
100
100
100
10U
100
100
SU
100
su
SU
SU
su
100
su
su
SU
SOU
lou
100
100
100
100
100
su
100
Su
su
su
su
loo
SO
su
su
sou
100
loo
100
100
100
Kcyt
J
H*
U
CctlMtcd value for a tentatively Identified compound.
Not analyird for.
rrwfvmfv) vns analysed for but not detected. Detection limit reported.
Ttirie rcmjiptifvlc require dilution to quantify tneat within the linear range
ol the HAnrUicU calibration curve..
-------
KLIS HITHIN CONTA!N"EKT SYSTE*
.msw
VOLATJLES
ACETONE
BEN:E«IE
OBn»""^w nen«r^jijT
£^K.«
CHLOP.8£TH««i£
CHLO*:?os"
PIW.3«3ETKA«l£.1.2-
BICK.CKETHYi.EliE.TfiMS-1,2-
D!CHLOP.BPRO'EN£,1,3-
ETHYL?EN:Eli£
KETONES
B£!HYL4-,-2-PEKTAH:NE
BETHYLENE CHL3P.ICE
STYPENE
TETI>A:H,O«DETKENE
TOLUENE
TfiixaSJl'.!1'.!!!-
TP.1CHLOR2ETHYLENE
VINYL CH.3MDE
TrLE»iES 'TOTAL)
SE-IVCLAT1LES
ACEN«?HTHYLENE
ANTHFA:ENE
BEN-OtilPYRENE
B!S'-:-CHLOP2E!H:iY!ETHAM
BIE (-2-CHLOf:3ETKCIY!»ETHAHE
B!St-2-:HLOP.:ETHYDETH£P
8I£:2-ETHYLH£1YL)PHTHALAT£
WTYlBENZYLMTHALATE
II-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
»ICB.9P.DIEH2E«,1.2-
D!C-.LO«KM:ENE,1,4-
D1ETHYL»HTHALAT£
FLUOP.ANTHENE
FLUOP.ENE *
BETHYLPHENSl.4-
NAFTNALENE
PHENANTNP.ENE
PHEN31
PYP.ENE
TfilCHLOF.CPHENBL. 2.4.6-
SAHPLE LOC r-2 r-2 K-3 K-3
SAtfLE 1 13-1185 23 13-1187 24
CONTRACTOR !»: JPB MVC JP.E
)AT£ SARFL£3l 1-16-81 8-12-83 11-16-81 8-12-8?
UNITS PPB PPB PPB PPB
2700 10
7 30
47
. 8:
25f «!??' BE
30630
140 3?C 60 100
4 40 5:
.
6100 8SOC 1430 8500
3400 7400 640 440:
350 57
X
-------
n»»..;s
V5.ATILES
ACETONE
BENZENE
BP.2i::iCHL3F.2!!ETHANE
BRO*2FOP«
CARBDN DISL'LFIDE
CHIWC-BEHIEME
CHLDP.KTHANE
CHLOPOC06^
0!DS.DR5STHAtt.M-
BICM.3RD£THANE,1,2-
D1CHLOROETHYLEN£,TRANS-1,2-
BICHLOPDPPOPANE.1,2-
D1CHLOR3PF.2FENE.1.3-
ETHYLBEX.'ENE
KTON-E
BETHYL4-,-2-PENTAN2NE
BETHYLENE CHLOFIBE
STYRENE
TETRA:H:.DP:ETHENE
TOLUENE
TRJCH:OS.OETH»NE, 1,1,1-
^^^^^BL**toU^*L I HH?li 1 1 * I • 2*
^^^^^^K- •— — •- . * , . f w
^^^H.O^SETHTLEN:
VINYL CHLORIDE
VlNrLIDENE CH..DSIDE
IYLENES (TOTAL)
SEfllVOLflTILES
ACENA^HTHYLENE
BEN!Oli!PYR£NE
B!5(-2-i:HLO?.;ETH:JY)ETHf.Ni
BlS!-2-i:HLOROETH3ZYI«ETHANC
BIS(-2-CHLDFO£THYL)ETHE»
BIS(2-ETHYLHEIYLIPHTHALATE
Bl!TYLHN:rLPHTHA.ATE
' CWENE
BI-N-BJ?YLPHTHAL*.TE
Dl-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
t!CHLO*3SES'!£N£.1.2-
D!:HLC»38£«2EME,1,4-
BlETHYLNTHSlATE
FLUCRANTHENE *
FIUOREN::
BETHYLPHEN2L,4-
NAPTHALM
«ANTHRENE
NE
. KELLE HITH
ASPLE LOC C-15 C-17 C-3
AHPLE 1 7 5
ONTRA:TGP. JRB JRB n:
BATE SAILED 8-10-83 8-10-6! 6-lt-Bl
UNITS PPB PPB PPB
790 2290
•
24
6K<
230
480 3C20C
630 81C
14ftA T^^A^
2*tr\f\
*•» *
4600
6200C 42400
75000 3400?
-
85
10
12000 13900
IN CDNTA!N*£*T SYSTEfl
C-19 C-10A MOA
2 35
JRB w: JRB
8-10-63 6-16-81 8-12-83
PPB PPB PPB
4430 76
280
73
47
760
650
50 74
43
4400 69
39000 60 36
.
730CO . IE
73
. 76
-
locooo r?oc iioo?
83000 16300 570?
370
350
140
12000
C-6A C-M C-23
39 it
w: ' JP.E m
6-16-Bi 8-12-3: e-ic-s:
PPB PPB pt*
13000 4200 !£::
27C 2C
4
21
200 77 1C
33BJO 5501 2Ci:
60 4! 79
?
5720 2600 EiC
14iJC 9!f «e:
190 3:
lie*,.'. |»rii' c:--
»••»• !•»•• .t*
14
2
21830
276?c 7s cc '.:::
MIC? 65?: :e::
30(;
10?
54 17
4-
5BOO 450? 1700
-------
DOIR&UIEN? HELLS
1
1
1
t
1
1
1
1
I
1
ccrars s
SA'FLE LOC
MRrJ 1
COXTRA:TOR
tSTE WffiM
UNITS
C-1B
1
m
B-10-B3
PPB
MB
m
12-10-84
PPB
CP-1
34
JftB
B-12-83
PFB
CP-B
B!!31
CDn
5-23-8!
PPB
C-27
BB54J
con
5-29-85
PPB
C-27\SCIL
BA913
con
5-2C-B!
PPB
C-29
BE!28
con
5-2-2-8!
PPB
5
P-tl
Bi!29
con
-23-8
PPB
r
2::c 1400 24jo
300 94
ice:
01CH;DWETH«KE,1,2-
KETOKES
HETNTLEH: CH.OR1DE
STYRENE
TETRAXOWSTHEtt
7D.UEKI
TRICOROETHftN£,l,l,l-
TFICHLSF.JETKANE, 1,1,2-
TF.ICH:ORi3ETHYLENE
VINYL CH;ORIDE
VIHMCENE CH.OF.IDE
lYLENEStTOTAJ
72C
760
450:
300
24
240C
500C
3!co:
78
190 6iJ
180 99:
20:0 B5!3
45
38
1700
3SO
B3CC
BE::
::: 34::: 130J
21
2J
6J
2J
2J
3J
SEH1VOLATILES
ACEN^HTKYLENE
BEN:C
-------
: BOMS*;: i ENT HELLS
:SA«LE IOC CP-2 CP-2 . CP-7 C-4A C-22 C-22
!SA«LE I 3! BB!!2 18
:COKTRA:TO* JRB JRB cor* «: JRB JRB
ATE SM.«.EC 8-12-8! 12-10-84 5-31-8S 6-U-81 8-10-8! 12-10-84
UNITS PPB • PPB PPB PPB PPB PPB
CO^D'JNIS
VQLST1I.ES
ACETONE
BENZENii
BRD*::!Cf.OP.2»[THA«l£
CA'.BCN D1S
CHLOF.:?EN:ENE
B1MLOP.5£THA«IE,1,1-
BICH13R2ETHAN£,1,2-
B1CHLOR3ETHYLEME.TRANS-1.?-
BIPH'3R2PP26A^r ] 2*
BICHLOp3PR2«'EHE!l,3-
ETHYLBENIENE
KETCHES
BETHYLENE CK.Of.liE
STYRENE
TETfACHLCMETHENE
TOLUENE
TRIOtORSSTHME.!,!,!-
ICHLO«ETHAME,1,1,2-
'.JCHLO'SETHY.ENE
VIMYL CHLOC.:DE
VINYLIDEKE CHLOP1IE
IYL£MES:TOTAL»
SERIVOLATItES
*CEN»&HTHYLENE
BEK.'IUIPYREHE
BlS»-2-CH.O»0£TH2lYlETHASE
B!S l-2-CHLOROETH:iY)BETHAKE
BISl-2-CHLOF.2ETHYL)ETH£F
Bl£!2-ETHYLH£IYL)PH.THALtTE
BL"YLiE«!
Bl-N-B'J'YLPHTHALSTE
Bl-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
BlI^C'iSE^IElE.l^-
81CK.9S:SEttEHE,M-
BIETMYL^KTHALAT!
FLU9f:ANTHENE
FLUORENE
BETHYLPHEM3L.4-
NAPTHALENE
PHENANTHRENE
WEM3L
TF.lC!-.L.-3Hi«L.:,4,(
24fC 280C
21
164
78
1100
1400fO 61000
27
30
377C HOC
250
780
1J50C
200
72
62
65
200
1770 2200
rec:
no:
lirOOO 47000 410C
7ICOO 240000 290 BS'OC 2tOOC 7700
14
8J
2J
22000 21000 10100
6J
72
41
34
38
-------
WKMS
VOLATILE!
ACETONE
B£*I£N£
BDfl^-f'Pk^1 no^MrT)44ty-
•pnv^cnpv
CARE!* PISL'LFIDE •
CHLOP2ETHAS-
CH:0^rOP^
BICKLORDETHAHE.1,1-
BICKLORSETHASi.l^-
BlCHLORDETHYlENE.TRAJiS-1,2-
BICHLOROPROPANi.1.2-
BICHLORCPR2°ENE,1,3-
ETHYLBE«ENE
KTWES
«ETH»H-.-2-PE»TAlCNE
BETHYLENE CHLOPISE '
STYRENE
TO.!**"
TF.I:K.OR:ETHA*E.:.I,I-
1RICH.3RCETMANE. 1,1,2-
V1NYL CHLORIDE
viNYLiDEKE CHLORIDE
IYLENEStTOTA.1
SERJV3LATILES
BIS!-2-CHL3B0£TH2TY)ETHA'i£
BIS '-2-CH,OPC£TH:i Y : HETHME
!!£!-r-CH.2PO!THYL)£TH£»
BIS!:-ETHYLH[TYL)PHTHALRTE
B'JTYLBEfCYLPMTHALATE
CU"£NE
Bl-0-B'JTYLWTHftLATE
BI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
B!PH: 0*ntEN1ENf 1 **•
BICHLOMBENZENE.1,4-
B1ETHYLPHTHALATE
FLUORANTHENE '
FLUORENE
«ETHYLPHENOL,4-
MAPTHALENE
PHENANTHRENE
PHENOL
•PYREME
THCHLO^PHENDL.2,4,6-
BOH^t:!
SAMPLE LOG C-ll C-ll C-24
SA-*LE i 36 is
CONTRACTOR \u: JRB JRB
BATE SAKFLES 6-16-61 8-12-83 B-12-B3
UNITS PPB PPB PPB
?Br 4:J 35C
»
4:
2f°: 7c
32
58
4!C 1400
140
370 6!C 400
n:
38000 130CC
•
4900 13000
190
62
89
62
ENT HELLS
CP-3 CP-3 C-7
32
JRB JRB m:
8-12-E: 12-10-84 6-16-81
PFB PPB PPB
170'.1
-------
ItPMI UMFIli
SWUNG unnm
SWUNMCR
DMIWCIW
OHIC9WUD
WITS
CMUMS
llddS
1
IAUMINM
MA
Jf
')n
H2-i3
•v/l
i IF».N»U
1 -i ~~ i
i
i
IN. A.
K11S HITHIN OMTRIMCXr 5TSTOI
c-ei
»
JRI
I-IO-SJ
•I/I
i in.***
I
i
i
in
IRNTINMT 1(0.201*0 II 0.201
IMISOIIC II O.OH M 0.011
iraiw I in
1 IN.H.
IKnUIW H0.05IM IIO.WI
ICMMIW 10.013 1 II O.CII
IOUIIM
ICMOUM
ICWIT
iam«
IIRDN
lUflO
iMncsiiM
INRHOTCSE
INENCMV
iMiaa
iPoiRSiui
ISEIOUIM
isiiva
ISOOIM
IIHUIM
IIIN
ivmnonn
IIINC
I
icvmitc
IPWWIS
IPdK7NT 91 IDS
1
IN.lt
L3 1
UN.
IN.M.
O.M 1
IN, A.
0.001 110.021
IN. A.
IN. A.
0.03H ii 0.021
INA 1
IN.* I
IN.N.
IN. A.
NLOOM IIO.MII
01171
INA i
Hill
0.0791
IN. A,
0.0141
0.02(1 1(0.011
IN. A.
IN. A,
10.101 1(0.101
IH«.
IN.R.
o.m
1
IN. A,
IN. A.
1 O.OPBI
1 1
10.011 1(0.011
O.KI
IN. A.
1 3.00 I
1 IN.A.
1 — ^_i ^ —
«-* «-«
me ej
t*c m
ll-U-il «-!2-«3
•i'i
i in.tott • in.iMf
i- 1 - -
•
i
i
M IN. A.
0 II 0.201
KO.OIIIB
1 IN. A.
110.051
110.011
IN. A.
0.4? 1
IN. A.
(0.0?!
IN. A.
0.0X1
IN. A.
IN. A.
110.001 INI
110.051
1 1". A.
MO.OIINO
0.0311
IN. A.
0.10 1
IN. A.
IN. A.
0.0341
1
(0.011
1.05 1
IN. A.
i
R-3
IOC
uc
II-U-OI
I IFt.NoU
N
R-3
24
JRf
0-I2-03
•I'I
I IFt.NoU
. 1
1
IN. A.
0 1(0.201
110.011
N 1 IN.A.
t II 0.051
f 1(0.011
A
I
S
II
N
A
I
T
S
1
5
IN. A.
0.531
IN. A.
(0.021
IN.A.
0.0751
IN. A.
IN. A,
(O.OOIINO
MU0MOIENT iniS
CM
NBOTB
CM
WJ-«
•I/I
I IFt.Nolt
A
1
I
t 1
31 III
3 III,!
mi i
0.3 III
4 III
7170 1
14 II
4 III
•
t
•
143901
71
•
0.12 1 III01
IN.A. IIIIJOII
O.OKI • 1
0.0101 3 III
IN.A. • 1
0.12 1 4 IU
IN. A. 17 111,1
IN. A. 151 1
2.1 1 • 1
1 1
( 0.011 • 1
0.46 1 IN. A,
IN. A. IN. ft.
1 1 '
C-ll
IOC
uuc
-
l-K-41
1 IFI.Nott
.
N
0
N
C
1
A
I
S '
A
N
A
L
f
9
1
5
'
C-ll
X
JIB
8-12-13
•I/I
0 IFI.NoU
| !
1
1
IN. A.
C-*4
15
m
0-12-03
•I'I
0 IFt.Noti
1 1 '
1
1
IN. A.
(0.201 1(0.201
0.02JI II O.OIINO
IN. A.
1 IN. A.
I 0.051 II 0.05IND
0.0231 II 0.011
IN. A.
5.1 1
IN.A. 1
IN. A.
0.3BI
IN. A.
0.15 1 1(0.021
IN. A.
IN. A.
0.121 IIO.OCI
IN. A.
IN. A.
IN. A.
I IN.a
(0.0011 10.00101
0.30 1 10.052 1
IN.H
1 I«.A,
0.0051 If 0.011
0.0191 110.011
IU A.
1 IN.A.
(0.101 1(0.101
IN. A.
IN. A.
0.9BI
1
IN. A.
IN. A.
0.03H
1
1 0.011 ( 0.011
0.25 1
IN. A.
1
0.37 1
IN. A.
1 „
-------
LIPMI UNFILL
9W.IW IOWTIW
9NUMMCR
*
.
tamrcm
MiE9ma
win
QWUQS
INHRLS
I
IM.IMIMM
ucmiorr mis
c-«
27
jn
•-I2-U
•I/I
i m.iMt
i
i
tin.
«-9
I
M
0-10-4]
*\n •
i m.iM*
i
i
in
re
12
jn
O-IO-CJ
•I/I
1
1 IFI.IMl
•
1
1
III
miS MIIHIN CONTAIWOn STSTEN
C-15
7
m
I-IO-U
•i/i
I IFI.IMt
1
1
III
IfNTIIOfr M0.0ei H0.20IM H0.20II0 H0.20IM)
IfMSmC 10.01(1 KO.OIIW IIO.OIIH) llf.011
imilM 1 III
i in
1 III 1 III
IKRnilW 110.091 110.051 It 0.051 II0.05IW
ICMMIIH M 0.011 KO.OIIW M 0.011 1(0.011
lOUItM III
IOODHW l.( 1
IOOBO.T tan
i in
10.0551
1 III
1 III 1 III
1 O.J7 1 1 0.21 1
1 III 1 III
ICOPVCI 0.0(71 110.021 110.021 HO.Oei
IIMM IN.fl
1 III
1 III 1 III
IL£« 0.0711 1(0.021 M 0.021 1(0.021
iwncsnn in
IMRNQRNESE IHA.
1 III
1 III
1 III 1 III
1 III 1 III
IKRCURV 1(0.0011 1(0.0011 10.00101 1(0.0011
INICKL II 0.031 II 0.051
iwnflssiw i me
1 III
isamiui ((MUNI MO.OII
ISIIVW 1(0.011 . J( 0.011
ISOOIIM III
ITHRLLHM 1.27 1
•TIN lift.
IVRMVIUN lift.
UltC 0.111
1 1
inmioE (O.OM N>
inrwLS o.wi
ircicnn SOLIDS in
1 III
It 0.01 IW
III
III
O.OKI
1
(0.01110)
0.171
III
lO.Ott 1 1 0.12 1
1 III 1 III
1(0. OHM) 1 IN)
110.011 It 0.011
1 III 1 III
1(0.101 MO.OIIW
III 1 III
III 1 III
0.001 1 0.0461
1 1 1
1 0.011 II 0.01 IW
O.ISI 1 1.) 1
III 1 III
C-17
me
JW
O-IO-M
_
1 IR.Mr
H
0
N
E
1
' •
I
S
ft
N
ft
I
f
S
1
S
C-l
me
MC
t-U-OI
t
I IFt.NoU
1
8
e-ii
me
m
0-IO-*J
•
• IFI.ftrt*
N
0
1
B
C-IOA
me
IK
l-lt-il
t *
1 Ift.lMt
1
S
C-IOA
B
m
0-12-OJ
•I/I
0 IFI.IMt
1
1
III
1 0.20110
o.oni
ill
(0.051
O.OUI
III
11 1
III
0.0901
III
O.OSI
III
III
0.0011!
O.lll
lift.
0.0311
0.0151
tin
(0.101
III
III
1.2 1
1
1 0.011
o.n i
in
C-«
ioc
IK
Hl-OI
0 IFt.ft**
N
0
N
C
?
N
I
S
ft
N
ft
I
»
1
1
S
-------
9
SHUNS unrim
SnfUMMEM
UMINMLlUI
MTEsmn •
IMITS
ODfOMDS
IICTALS
1
IAUMIMN
HMTIMMT
IflflSOOC
IIMIW
lecnunn
icnmiw
I0UIM
ICMONIM
loom.?
lOWtt
HUM
(LEAD
iNnncsnM
INRNSVGI
iNfiom
INIOO.
iPOTPssrui
ISEUNIIM
ISIIVW
ISOOIIM
IIWUIIM
HIM
iwmut*
IIINC
1
ICYMIDE
IPtTNQLS
I9OTNKV SOLIDS
1
1
un*i uro IUL ^^m ^^m
0*-3
3?
JIB
§-tt-*j
•9/1
• iFi.wt
1
1
lift.
( 0.20IND
0.0381
IN. A.
10.051
0.01(1
IN. A.
« 1
IN.lt
0.0*31
IN. ft.
0.0401
IN. ft.
IN. A.
0.001(1
O.OWI
IN. ft.
1 0.01 IN)
0.0111
IE*.
10.101
IN, ft.
IN.A.
e.»
(0.01
0.80
N.A.
P-l
NDC
tn
W-lfr-W
• in.***
'
, . ,
— ' —
N
0
0 •
r
1
A
I
9
A
M
A
I
y
c
i
s
C-7
NBC
ue
(-K-4I
1 IFl.tMt
N
0
N
C
1
A
L
S
A
N
A
L
»
S
1
S
DMcanoianuaLS
e-7
37
in
I-IZ-H
*'l
I IFI.Nolf
1
1
IN, ft.
tp-e
33
sn
l-^M
•I/I
i irt.iM*
i
i
IN. A.
(o.wi no.ni
0.01)1 1(0.011
IN.A, 1 IN.A.
IO.OSIND IIO.C5I
0.0171
IN. A.
1(1
IN. A.
0.10 1
IN, A.
0.0801
IN.A.
IN. A.
(O.OOIIND
0.11 1
IN. A.
0.191
0.0171
IN, A.
1 0.101
IN. A.
IN. A.
0.3 1
1
I 0.011
0.87 1
IN. A,
1
O.OJII
IN. A.
17.1 1
IN. A.
O.OMI
IN. A.
0.0771
IN. A,
IN. A.
(O.OOIINO
0.19 1
IN. A.
O.Ortl
o.oeoi
IN. A.
( 0.101
IN. A.
IN. A.
0.33 1
1
1 0.011
(.( 1
IN. A.
1
O^2
NDC
in
IZ-IO-M
1 IFI.Nott
N
0
N
0>-7
NM779
ON
V3l-«
••/I
1 IFt.Nbtt
•
31
1?
3?8
E 1(0.41
f 1(4.31
A K40M
1 I 477
8 1(141
A
N
A
L
»
1
1
S
•
•
1140
KM
•
t
394
(44201
f
•
•
U
J III
17 111,1
(141 1
t 1
1
• 1
IN. ft.
IN, A.
1
i
C-4A C-Z2
NONE II
WC Ml
(-((-•I 1-IO-fJ
•I/I
1
iri.NMr 1 IFI.Nol*
1
1
N IN.*.
0 110.201
II 0.011
N 1 IH A.
C M O.OSINO
T M ff.OII
A i«. ft.
1 0.74 I
S IN. A.
O.OWI
IN. A,
0.03?l
IN. A.
IN. A.
(O.OOIIND
0.10 1
IN. A.
l( 0.011
M 0.011
1 IHN.
II 0.101
IN. A,
IN. A.'
0.131
1
It. Oil
0.79 1
IN. A.
1
c-a
NONE
m
»-IO-M
I IFI.Nott
•
N
0
N
C
T
A
L
S
'
1
S
-------
SRNPUN5 LOCATION
SMUNMC1
•
twI^-IU
MTcsma
IMITS
COMPOUNDS
tens
i
IAUMIMM
MMTIIOff
IMSENIC
IKWIIM
IKnUIIM
ICMMIIM
IGQLCIUN
ICMDIIIM
ICWU
iaw«
IIHON
llfflO
INROCSIUN
imcncsE
HCAOJff
INICNEL
IPOTPSSIUN
ISQDtlUN
isnvn
ISaOlUN
ITKUIIM
(TIN
IWKCIUN
I1INC
1
ICVRNIK
IMNU5
ISUSPMO sain
1
i
urai UMFIU.
KMCmiENT IILLS
C-ll
me
J»
I-IO-U
1
I 1
_____
F1.M.
N
0
N
C
T
A
L
8
•_•___»
C-ll
IOC
jn
IMO-04
•
I IFt.NoU
N
0
ft
I
f
ft
L
1
ft
N
ft
L
T
1
1
8
OH
34
m
••10*3
A
f IFI.MI
1
1
IN. ft.
10.201
0.0871
IN. ft.
10.031
O.OUI
IN. ft.
31.0 1
IN. ft.
0.20 1
IN. ft.
0.921
IN.A, *
IN. A.
0.00241
0.701
IN. ft.
0.0291
a»-o
NB8778
QM
^"?J "DJ
•I/I
«
I
•
1331
43
1060
10
9.2
tsaoo
108
19.31
•
t
•
17800
360
t
103
3920
•
0.0001 117.11
n.teu
i
i
lift. 1 1030001
0.24 1 10 IU
lift. 17 1(1,1
IN. ft. flOl 1
1.3 1 91 1
1 1
10.011 • 1
7.1 1 IN. A.
IN. A. IN. A.
1 1
C-27
MITTS
CM
5-29--S
•
1 IFt.Not.
1
1
• 1
31 IU
C8.1I 1
• 1
3.3 1
4 IU
29000 1
lot i
4 IU
• 1
• 1
t 1
1364011
• 1
• 1
• 1
1471011
• 1
f 1
• 1
3 IU
17 111,1
72 1
• 1
1
• 1
IN. A.
IN. A.
1
.^^hi
C-27
NONE
ON
3-20-fS
I
1 IFt.NoU
N
0
C-29
M8800
CM
^"22"W
I IFI.Nott
1
1
• 1
31 IU
1IU.I
11921 1
110.31 1
4 IU
C-31
NNT73
CM
WJ-B
M/l
a
1 IFI.IMt
•
1
1
• 1
31 id
3 IU.I
1711 1
0.3 IU
4 IU
937001 131700 1
IK II 119.41 II
4 IU 4 IU
t •
I •
• •
142001 U40
44 m
• •
77 118.91
1464011 II2T901I
II •)
3 IU 3 IU
303001 9310 1
10 IU 4 IU
17 1(1,1 17 111,1
4 IU 4 IU
• 1 • 1
1 1
• 1 • 1
IN. A. IN.A.
IN. A. IN. ft.
r i
-------
FOOTNOTES
JRB DATA EPA S*A DATA
N.A. Not Analyzed N.A. Not Analyzed
ND Not Detected NO Not Detected
A Approximate Value
WWC DATA
N..A. Not Analyzed
CDV DATA
N.A. Not Analyzed
U Element was analyzed for but not detected. Reported with the
detection limit value (e.g. 10U).
R Spite sa-r'e recovery is not within control limits.
[ ] Result is greater th?- or equal to instrument detection limit but
less than the contract required detection limit.
* . Data did not pass EPA quality assurance.
(*) Duplicate analysis is not within control limits.
REFERENCES
Environmental Protection Agency Surveillance and Analysis (EPA S4A), 8/79.
Scientific ApplStations International Corporation (formerly JRB Associates,
Inc.) (JRB), Long Term Remedial Action Monitoring Program, LiPari Waste
Disposal Site, Priority Pollutant Sampling - 8/83.
•
Woodward-Clyde Consultants, Inc. (WWC), Project Summary for 1981, Ground-
water Chemist^ ana Monitoring Well Installation (March 1981), LiPari Waste
Disposal Site.
Camp Dresser 2 McKee Inc. (CDM), Remedfa] Investigation Data, 2/85-7/85.
-------
*'/
• Emlinq wtlti
100 0 IQQ too
IJ/'"-* x\ I
I V-% \ I „
/u... >!<;->,
Monitoring Wpll
Locations
liP.vi l.tmtM. Oramm Cnnly.
-------
COM 108'
Chestnut Branch Marsh
Soil Confirmatory Snmplo Locations
«Unur«l« Comly.
-------
N
400
Seal*
CDM 1965
Chestnut Branch Marsh Soil Sampling Sites
LiPari landfill, Gloucester.County. New Jersey
-------
• Surface water, sampling site
^ Sedtont qr«b and boring sampling site
i.ooo o i.ooo
Scale
reel
CDM I98S
Stream Grab and Lake Grab/Boring
Sampling Sites
LtPnrl Landfill. Gloucester Cnimly. Now Jeisny
-------
SW-27
SE-27
JGDp
ltn»2-
n
SW 9wf«c* *•!•»
SC Strmi MhMnt witf L«k* Cor*
900
900
Seal*
*•••• «nW«4
COM 1985/1986
Lake and Stream Surface Water, Stream Sediment and Lake Core Sampling Sites
LiPari Landfill. Gloucester County. New Jetsey
------- |