United States Environmental Protection Agency Air and Radiation Acid Rain Division (6204J) Washington, D.C. 20460 EPA430/R-95-012 December 1995 Revised &EPA Acid Rain Program Emissions Scorecard 1994 SO2, A/Ox, Heat Input, and CO2 Emission Trends in the Electric Utility Industry ------- Acid Rain Program Emissions Scorecard 1994 1994 was Spring training for the Acid Rain Program, the country's first nationwide program to use market-based incentives and a team approach to achieve environmental objectives. This "Emissions Scorecard" presents the emissions data collected in the start-up year of the program. A New "Ball Game" in Emissions Monitoring Established by Title IV of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, the goal of the Acid Rain Program is to achieve significant environmental and public health benefits through reductions in electric utility emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOX). The Clean Air Act requires annual SO2 emissions to be brought 10 million tons below their 1980 level by year 2010. The Act also calls for significant reductions of NOX emissions by year 2000. Among the innovative features of this program are its great flexibility and its heavy reliance on economic incentives, not government proscription. Units affected by the program are free to choose how they meet their emission limits. For example, compliance options might include switching to cleaner fuels, installing pollution controls, or reducing user demand for electricity. In addition, under the Acid Rain Program, units that reduce their SO2 emissions below their specified limit can sell their unused "allowances" on the open market. Each allowance represents an authorization to emit one ton of S02. Other units can buy these allowances and apply them to meeting their current or future emissions requirements. For the market in allowances to work, buyers and sellers must be assured that each allowance represents exactly 1 ton 1 ------- 2 of SO2, neither more nor less. This assurance can only be obtained from an accurate, 100% accounting of emissions. With this in mind, the Clean Air Act required units covered under the Acid Rain Program to perform emission measurements using Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems (CEMS), the proven industry standard for measuring S02, NOX, and C02. In 1994, the first 263 utility units covered under the Acid Rain Program were required to install CEMS, pass a series of performance tests designed to demonstrate the accuracy of the instruments, and submit a year's worth of emissions data. However, unlike future years when the CEMS measurements will be tallied against allowances at the end of the year, 1994 represented a start-up year when problems could be diagnosed and corrected without impacting the operation of the allowance market. In effect, the Clean Air Act gave the regulated community and EPA a year to get into shape before official "play" began in 1995. Rules of the Game In order to ensure uniformity in data submissions and facilitate efficient review, the Acid Rain Program relies on electronic reporting of emissions data. EPA set forth specifications for data submissions in the Acid Rain Regulations (40 CFR §75.62-64) and in a related guidance document Electronic Data Reporting, updated periodically. In essence, the specifications require data to be submitted in certain pre-defined record structures and electronic file formats. In 1994, emissions data were submitted by regulated utilities to EPA via floppy computer diskettes. In April 1995 selected utilities and EPA began testing direct electronic transmission of data via modem dial-up to EPA's computer. In the future, this is expected to become the common method of submission. Data received by EPA was recorded in the Emission Tracking System (ETS), an electronic database designed specifically for managing data related to atmospheric emissions from utilities. ETS performs a series of quality control checks on the data. This is accomplished through error checking software which analyzes data records for internal inconsistencies, omissions, and other data errors. Once any defects in the data are identified, a report explaining the deficiencies is printed and sent to the designated ------- representative of the affected unit. Before being incorporated into ETS, the error checking software was field tested on real data at several utilities. After completion of field testing, revised copies of the tested software were made available to the entire regulated community for use in debugging their own on-site data acquisition and handling systems. This approach was designed to prevent errors where possible and facilitate their correction when necessary. The Lineups Underlying the Acid Rain Program is the concept that environmental objectives can be achieved at least cost and least burden, if industry, EPA, and regional, state, and local environmental agencies work together as a team. In 1994 the industry "players" consisted of the companies that operate the 263 utility units in 21 states. These are known as Table 1 affected utilities. (The name derives from a table of affected units found in the Acid Rain Regulations.) In 1995, the operators of more than 2,000 additional units will join the Acid Rain Program team. The government "players" on the team included Acid Rain Division staff at EPA Headquarters in Washington, regional EPA personnel, and representatives of state and local environmental agencies. Their goal was to provide maximum start- up assistance to industry to facilitate compliance and reduce the need for enforcement actions. Team "warm-up" activities included • conducting a series of technical conferences on monitoring requirements and the Emission Tracking System, • actively participating in industry sponsored conferences to respond to questions and stay in touch with the realities faced by industry, • developing and disseminating error checking software, • establishing an electronic bulletin board for timely response to policy questions, • working one-on-one with every affected unit to certify monitors and debug quarterly emission data submissions, and • issuing certificates for every emissions monitor that passed its initial certification tests. The Scorecard Conscientious effort by industry and government team players is paying off. 3 ------- 4 Milestones Achieved: Nearly all Phase I units began monitoring emissions as required by November 15, 1993 and submitted CEM certification test results by the December 15, 1993 deadline. As required, EPA reached determinations on all complete CEM certification test submissions within 120 days and on all Table 1 units by November 1994. A combination of conscientious industry effort, support from EPA, and incentives for superior monitor performance produced unprecedented certification test results. Data Quality: Having an opportunity to identify and correct data quality problems proved extremely valuable both for industry and EPA. Thus, while not completely free of errors, the 1994 emissions data were sufficiently robust to derive supportable end-of-year emission values for each reporting unit. In a few instances, data reporting problems necessitated using estimated values in place of fully monitored values. Most important, however, the 1994 emission data provides a credible basis for detecting and correcting errors before "official" play begins in 1995. Emission Results: National and state- level trends in SO2 and NOX emissions and heat input are depicted in the graphics on the following pages. C02 emissions in 1994 are also presented. For SO2 the market approach appears to be resulting in significant early reductions in S02 emissions from Table 1 units. Nationally, for these units SO2 emissions dropped from an estimated 9.4 million tons in the 1980 baseline year to 7.4 million tons in 1994. Interestingly, this is nearly down to the allowance target level for Table 1 units in 1995. Early reductions of SO2 may be attributable to early implementation of emission controls and fuel switching that will be used to meet the 1995 SO2 emission limits. The national trend appears to be repeated at the state level with practically every state seeing a proportionate reduction in 1994 SO2 emissions from earlier baseline levels. In contrast, the nationwide 1994 NOX emissions for Table 1 units appear to be holding relatively steady at earlier baseline levels, ranging from 1.9 - 2.0 million tons between 1985 and 1994. A failure to see reductions in NOX emissions may be attributable to the lag in promulgating final regulations governing NOX emissions, the absence of an allowance market for NOX reductions, and ------- the hesitancy of industry to invest in NOX controls until regulatory uncertainties are resolved. In keeping with the relative steadiness of NOX emissions at the national level, no consistent pattern of reductions or increases can be found in state-level NOX emissions. Heat input, an indicator of the magnitude in electric generation, suggests modest growth between 1990 and 1994. In interpreting all of the trends data, it must be kept in mind that the 1994 results represent measured values derived from continuous emission monitoring systems, whereas the earlier results represent estimates derived from fuel analysis (SO2) and emission factors (NOX). Relatively modest changes in data values, like those shown for NOX and heat input, may be attributable to the different basis of measurement not to actual changes in emissions. In contrast, changes like those shown in SO2 emissions are too substantial to simply be attributable to the different basis of measurement. C02 emissions from Table 1 units totaled approximately 465 million tons in 1994. The accompanying graphics depict the state distribution of C02 emissions. Individual "Stats" This "Emissions Scorecard" concludes with a table of S02, NOX, C02, and heat input data for the complete roster of Table 1 industry "players." These data, along with the text and graphics in this report, are available electronically on the Internet at the Acid Rain Program's World Wide Web site: http://www.epa.gov/docs/acidrain/ardhome.html. There are no trends data for C02. The Clean Air Act Amendment's mandate to collect C02 data is designed to provide baseline data for future use. Nationally, 5 ------- Sulfur Dioxide Emissions 6 National Trend o £ o UJ H 1N C O o ) = 1980 1985 1990 1994 1995 Target Year State Totals 1980 0 1985 1990 O 1994 States grouped by their respective EPA regional offices. -1,500,000 -1,000,000 -500,000 -0 1980 1985 1990 1994 1980 1985 1990 1994 Alabama Florida Georgia Illinois Indiana Iowa 1980 301,150 200,652 767,443 782,948 1,365,626 72,117 S02 in tons 1985 1990 300,428 226,292 814,718 782,373 1,304,436 75,183 236,699 226,480 702,947 697,897 1,226,609 60,303 1994 209,243 217,624 416,615 603,864 991,618 46,838 Kansas Kentucky Maryland Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri New Hampshire 16,430 429,846 142,060 52,790 8,320 59,470 904,920 53,500 3,255 472,229 134,495 60,530 2,176 72,619 772,673 54,238 3,768 461,973 176,901 22,784 1,547 87,138 632,926 40,175 6,782 455,501 143,144 23,014 995 53,948 411,438 42,375 New Jersey New York Ohio Pennsylvania Tennessee West Virginia Wisconsin National Totals 33,840 159,098 1,587,833 747,050 722,320 753,060 210,160 9,370,633 34,122 174,061 1,752,637 676,092 638,221 724,434 226,773 9,301.985 31,517 129,733 1,802,003 675,537 590,351 741,133 134,809 8,683,230 33,393 89,004 1,612,201 630,579 608,370 720,094 62,664 7.379,304 Note: 1994 emission values obtained from Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems (CEMS). ------- Nitrogen Oxides Emissions National Trend •« _ 1.5 E LU I- ox| ll State Totals Alabama Florida Georgia Illinois Indiana Iowa 1985 78,275 59,116 154,008 194,566 291,613 12,737 NOX in tons 1990 59,857 54,546 146,055 174,712 300,077 15,530 1994 48,244 51,965 84,238 145,769 245,043 15,312 States grouped by their respective EPA regional offices. 1985 1990 1994 1985 1990 1994 Kansas Kentucky Maryland Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri New Hampshire 690 110,442 40,334 14,144 3,300 18,469 162,272 20,848 1,754 113,666 50,161 14,027 7,778 19,000 184,962 18,427 1,802 136,280 62,259 11,539 5,788 9,942 125,450 28,298 New Jersey New York Ohio Pennsylvania Tennessee West Virginia Wisconsin 12,356 25,050 299,231 151,630 138,230 165,122 59,053 10,901 26,894 306,287 149,588 129,903 166,208 48,387 7,240 16,519 324,863 193,794 194,328 176,725 34,133 National Totals 2,011,486 1,998,720 1,919,532 Note: 1994 emission values obtained from Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems (CEMS). ------- Carbon Dioxide Emissions Heat Input States grouped bv their respective EPA regional offices. State Totals Alabama Florida Georgia Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Maryland Michigan Minnesota C02 in tons 1994 19,006,148 12,027,236 38,957,929 31,213,953 58,497,975 4,616,328 612,084 28,017,335 11,687,273 3,506,444 1,344,821 Mississippi Missouri New Hampshire New Jersey New York Ohio Pennsylvania Tennessee West Virginia Wisconsin National Totals 1994 2,985,042 33,293,886 3,275,615 627,437 8,476,931 71,295,151 43,309,322 35,179,036 45,859,716 11,589,546 465,397,208 8 States grouped by their respective EPA regional offices. State Totals Alabama Florida Georgia Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Maryland Michigan Minnesota Heat Input in 1990 149,592,710 101,891,046 444,984,386 274,521,947 535,860,762 33,247,345 3,833,333 229,807,746 127,237,731 37,015,329 6,023,365 mmBtu 1994 184,301,440 125,214,800 384,003,031 303,530,942 564,918,644 44,354,269 6,008,890 229,818,455 114,963,384 34,176,584 11,378,076 Mississippi Missouri New Hampshire New Jersey New York Ohio Pennsylvania Tennessee West Virginia Wisconsin National Totals 1990 44,645,381 295,581,941 26,398,228 14,847,944 129,981,035 708,860,873 433,809,463 290,866,026 400,530,464 92,961,771 4,382,498,826 1994 29,094,040 324,668,819 31,862,075 15,206,692 88,513,683 687,531,647 419,618,730 335,910,195 422,039,132 111,537,464 4,468,650,932 Note: 1994 emission values obtained from Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems (CEMS). ------- Emissions Trends Through 1994 Under the Acid Rain Program [SO2 , NOx, and CO 2 Emissions and Heat Input for 263 units in Table 1 of §73.10 (a) of the Acid Rain Regulations] STATE PLANT NAMF. STACK/UNIT IP ALABAMA COLBERT CSCO14 (1,2,3,4) 5 E C GASTON CSOCAN (1 ,2) CSOCBN (3,4) 5 FLORIDA BIG BEND [5, 6] CS001 (BB01,BB02) BB03 CRIST 6 7 GEORGIA BO WEN 1BLR 2BLR 3BLR 4BLR HAMMOND CS001 (1,2,3) 4 JACK MCDONOUGH CS001 (MB1.MB2) WANSLEY 1 2 YATES Y1BR CS001 (Y2BR,Y3BR) CS002 (Y4BR,Y5BR) Y6BR Y7BR ILLINOIS BALDWIN 1 2 3 COFFEEN CS0001 (01,02) GRAND TOWER 9 HENNEPIN 2 JOPPA STEAM CS1(1,2) CS2 (3,4) CS3 (5,6) KING AID CS0102(1,2) MEREDOSIA 5 SO2 Emissions (tons) 1980 1985 1990 1994 93,210 88,822 54,589 40,085 36,410 52,318 21,511 44,898 47,710 44,082 47,495 29,863 48,310 46,854 43,156 31,353 75,510 68,352 69,948 63,044 110,001 110,001 89,200 95,695 32,901 32,901 57,880 63,368 22,540 27,469 29,138 21,455 35,210 55,921 50,262 37,106 71,428 71,428 48,793 39,437 63,727 63,727 58,068 46,299 82,488 82,488 71,224 62,456 87,659 87,659 77,321 50,550 22,660 28,895 26,322 7,569 25,910 35,539 36,412 7,268 66,487 66,487 56,077 22,563 120,370 128,505 111,980 71,386 96,870 120,146 111,984 72,659 11,673 11,673 9,892 4,082 22,478 22,478 14,391 5,220 29,512 29,512 21,059 5,557 42,207 42,207 29,570 11,048 23.974 23,974 29,854 10,521 81,560 89,277 82,932 89,050 96,330 78,477 92,830 83,798 88,130 96,840 54,763 64,719 140,629 140,629 114,315 76,707 9,754 9,754 7,894 9,458 31,650 39,436 27,499 24,624 33,970 34,939 38,105 10,252 35,360 37,682 41,555 7,993 32,830 35,763 42,543 47,969 189,280 173,961 166,399 155,497 27,015 27,015 15,013 22,570 NOx Emissions (tons) 1985 1990 1994 21,126 18,599 13,250 12,515 5,612 12,017 14,165 12,135 6,592 15,057 10,930 6,441 15,412 12,581 9,946 34,592 27,940 31,152 8,391 11,433 10,118 5,303 5,552 4,403 10,830 9,621 6,292 13,175 11,766 10,115 14,768 14,060 10,240 17,052 16,925 14,201 18,123 18,485 12,068 9,662 8,504 2,791 11,893 11,841 1,663 10,395 10,611 9,149 19,088 17,045 9,166 17,846 17,046 8,942 1,979 1,859 1,239 3,811 2,685 850 5,002 3,918 933 7,151 5,601 1,144 4,063 5,709 1,736 27,743 25,722 31,238 33,453 28,689 24,988 12,332 6,941 5,059 36,326 30,921 31,781 1,912 1,424 1,404 5,365 4,035 3,228 6,788 7,601 2,598 7,306 8,263 2,658 6,939 8,471 7,602 50,037 48,339 30,844 3,938 2,268 3,343 CO2 (tons) 1994 5,175,340 2,996,555 2,613,005 2,756,121 5,465,127 4,973,426 3,127,863 1,343,121 2,582,826 4,395,136 5,185,736 7,263,412 5,863,752 746,054 742,140 3,066,258 4,560,449 4,451,469 441,178 332,885 350,649 707,215 851,597 3,599,938 3,386,672 2,737,174 5,066384 437,866 1,126,759 2,772,785 2,813,041 2,938,294 4,738,689 1,032,215 Heat Input (mmBtu) 1990 1994 42,021,862 50340,61 S 12,533,857 28,685,738 28374,165 25364,861 25,549,008 26,852,727 41,113,818 53,057,496 40,169,528 56,514,431 27351,449 30,435,762 12,562397 13,090,843 21,807,672 25,173,764 38,037,093 42,837,570 45,497,555 50,543,238 54,713,624 70,793,487 59,658399 57,151,619 20,740,726 11,567,611 28,855,929 7,233351 33,694,167 29,885,516 50,089,022 44,448,818 50,104,671 43386,662 5,949,961 4,299,978 8,596,900 3,244,479 12,547,589 3,417,605 18,062,672 6,892,964 18,436,078 8300,133 30,208,270 35,099,112 33,671,639 32,994,804 20,101,746 26,667,504 35,424,535 49340,417 3,140,075 4,265,075 11,249,224 10,970,654 23,272,171 27,087,829 25324,781 27,478,561 25,938,128 28,551,038 53,747,889 45,517,672 6,794,793 10,060,575 Emission Trends http://www. epa.gov/docs/acidrain/ ardhome.html ------- Emissions Trends Through 1994 Under the Acid Rain Program [SO 2 , NOx, and CO2 Emissions and Heal Input for 263 units in Table 1 of §73. JO (a) of the Acid Rain Regulations] STATE INDIANA IOWA PLANT NAME STACK/UNIT ID VERMILION 2 BAILLY CS001/CS002 (7,8) BREED 1 CAYUGA 1 2 CLIFTY CREEK CS001 (1,2,3) CS002 (4,5,6) ELMER W STOUT 50 60 70 F B CULLEY 2 3 FRANK ERATTS 1SG1 2SG1 GIBSON CS0003 (1,2) CS0004 (3,4) HTPRITCHARD[1] 6 (CS596-5) MICHIGAN CITY 12 PETERSBURG CS292(1,2) R GALLAGHER CS0001 (1,2) CS0002 (3,4) TANNERS CREEK U4 W ABASH RIVER CS0005 (1,2,3,5,6) WARRICK [6] 4 BURLINGTON [6] 1 DES MOINES 1 1 GEORGE NEAL NORTH 1 MILTON L KAPP 2 PRAIRIE CREEK 4 RIVERSIDE 9 SO2 Emissions (tons) 1980 1985 1990 1994 16,440 18,600 14,049 11,227 50,160 39,186 67,022 7,939 72,890 70,365 32,895 0 54,720 56,848 64,250 62,802 63,620 69,254 53,063 52380 149,630 136,454 133,175 120,628 146,110 132,408 142,719 133,428 5,665 5,665 4,122 9,384 7,743 7,743 3,419 6,597 35,007 35,007 25,185 36,789 16,860 16,361 16,623 5,952 41,630 38,456 27,327 37,849 19,069 19,069 17,186 22,200 18,436 18,436 20,546 18,884 148,170 149,331 133,241 90,332 163,020 145,338 126,907 81,449 10,270 7,586 9,155 3,327 63,100 45,434 46,770 14496 96,440 74,875 88,438 83,796 30,540 20,948 15,395 24,882 30,490 42,863 31,063 38,098 59,646 59,646 72,283 46,705 58,510 54,350 59,698 40,178 23,900 58,813 36,127 53,723 22,440 23,093 18,448 9,228 2,490 2,490 0 0 2,480 1,048 1,755 3,608 30,950 31,379 19,151 16,126 9,050 12,466 12,497 4313 4,707 4,707 8,452 13,563 NOx Emissions (tons) 1985 1990 1994 2,427 2,038 1,027 12,314 21,718 27,820 16,270 8,271 0 9,003 10,950 5,511 10,967 9,051 4,885 36,920 34,173 34,658 35,827 36,519 39,719 1,141 1,012 1,080 1,560 838 1,428 7,052 6,182 4,605 2,885 3,227 1,119 6,772 5,337 7,154 3,550 3,038 2,677 3,433 3,665 2,774 33,228 32,523 14,362 32,325 30,974 17,413 1,929 2,329 1,395 15,142 21,122 19,592 13,100 13,231 9479 3,517 3,513 3,231 6,974 6,994 5,088 16,360 25,628 21,406 11,787 12,847 7,630 9,557 6,935 12,216 3,418 2,656 1,732 753 0 0 565 5,019 4,544 4,039 3,666 2,479 2,933 2,972 3,944 1,029 1,217 2,613 CO2 (tons) 1994 564,135 3,619,290 3,559,409 3,001,878 4,115,599 4,750,657 558,093 401,716 2,237,986 429,863 1,465,540 985,692 847,482 7,291,784 6^39,581 439,431 2,969,593 4,011308 1,530,167 2,550366 2,267,676 2,774,423 2350,445 1,084,041 0 966,725 1,016,272 740366 808,924 Heat Input (mniBtu) 1990 1994 5,648,696 5,497,701 26361,579 35333,583 0 0 31,543,436 34,692,068 26,083,997 29,258,104 45,733,268 40,095330 48,821,048 46,273,807 3,031,837 5,439,507 2,506,964 3,915356 18387,115 21,812,728 6,878,039 4,187,851 11,226,701 14^84,754 6,445,631 9,438^87 7,780452 8,143380 66,970427 70,724,860 63,760,412 57,918,848 5,847,456 3,077,905 25,769,619 28,979339 39322,120 39,096,566 7,416,643 14,903,160 14,719,184 24,702,405 30,733406 21,435,650 31,774,532 26,899337 14,747,496 24305,819 7,582,757 10459,115 0 0 5321,528 9,586,634 10,907,092 9,905,188 5,932,569 6,918,848 3,503399 7,684,484 Emission Trends 10 http://www.epa.gov/docs/acidrain/ardhome.html ------- Emissions Trends Through 1994 Under the Acid [SO2 , NOx, and CO2 Emissions and Heat Input for 263 units in Table 1 of §73.10 Rain Program (a) of the Acid Rain Regulations] STATE PLANT NAME STACK/UNIT ID KANSAS QUINDARO 2 KENTUCKY COLEMAN Cl C2 C3 COOPER [5, 6] CS1(1,2) E W BROWN 1 CS003 (2,3) ELMER SMITH [6] CS001/CS002 (1,2) GHENT CS001 GREEN RIVER 5 H L SPURLOCK [5, 6] 1 HMP&L STATION 2 CSHOO (H1,H2) PARADISE 3 SHAWNEE 10 MARYLAND C P CRANE 1 2 CHALK POINT [7] CSE 12(1,2) MORGANTOWN 1 2 MICHIGAN JH CAMPBELL CS0009(1,2) 1 2 MINNESOTA HIGH BRIDGE [1] 6 (CS0001-3-4-5) MISSISSIPPI JACK WATSON MS4A/MS4B (4) MS5A/MS5B (5) MISSOURI ASBURY 1 JAMES RIVER 5 LABADIE 1 2 3 4 SO2 Emissions (tons) 1980 1985 1990 1994 16,430 3,255 3,768 6,782 18,537 18,537 24,480 16,881 19,862 19,862 21,286 21,585 19,007 19,007 24,864 17,119 19,260 23,475 18,616 21,135 6,000 6,242 8,700 8,116 49,340 48,606 46,404 45,155 45,350 36,931 50,416 59,275 52,240 71,102 70,203 54,269 12,939 12,939 10,466 13,251 14,650 29,745 26,553 26,019 44,871 44,871 43,690 37,376 113,810 106,835 115,186 132,051 13,980 34,077 1,109 3,269 3,700 9,722 13,878 14,658 6,710 9,657 15,501 14,406 37,760 47,740 62,232 45366 42,350 29,388 47,102 42,410 51,540 37,988 38,188 26,304 52,790 60,530 22,784 23,014 8,320 2,176 1,547 995 19,980 26,218 32,855 21,954 39,490 46,401 54,283 31,994 67,300 68,769 24,938 7,595 10,250 9,096 6,738 4,350 57,660 72,811 75,182 38,964 52,520 63,653 56,627 27,173 59,330 67,587 68,624 46,005 71,730 65,591 49,437 37,950 NOx Emissions (tons) 1985 1990 1994 690 1,754 1,802 4,616 5,092 2,044 4,959 4,435 2,570 4,743 5,179 5,036 7,515 6,595 6,326 1,707 2,126 1,506 9,494 9,199 9,837 6,940 10,765 17,923 8,913 10,216 18,343 3,302 2,453 3,149 7,927 8,717 3,830 10,080 8,844 10,012 35,025 39,015 54,475 5,221 1,030 1,230 6,265 6,182 6,985 3,312 6,888 7,749 15,560 17,971 24,735 6,587 10,515 15,728 8,610 8,605 7,063 5,203 4,739 2,782 8,941 9,288 8,757 3,300 7,778 5,788 6,444 7,112 4,644 12,025 11,888 5,298 11,847 13,156 7,771 1,356 1,888 1,078 11,205 11,717 4,653 9,796 8,523 4,495 10,401 10,691 4,768 10,098 7,843 4,239 CO2 (tons) 1994 612,084 915,739 1,113,230 877,778 1,714,758 489,018 3,501,675 2,748,467 5,893,481 730,834 1,626^27 1,788,954 5,527,489 1,089,584 1,068,530 1,042,827 3,308,262 3,744380 2,523,275 3,506,444 1344,821 1 456,460 1,728,582 1,622,685 370,908 3,667,874 2,458,435 4,265,955 3,237,033 Heat Input (mmBtu) 1990 1994 3,833333 6,008,890 10,837340 8,925330 9,439,599 10,850,193 11,004,877 8,555343 15,193,121 17,184,684 4,953,654 4,766,258 29,822,194 33,903,114 18,671,401 18,671,401 30,484325 22,470,294 5376,242 7,123,140 19,797,088 16,017,457 20,192,741 17,433,645 50,494,444 53,297,864 3,540,720 10,619,732 8,941,526 10,407,011 9,982,868 10,155,438 43323,242 33,099,009 35,739,299 36,688,840 29,250,796 24,613,086 15398,430 11,741,911 21,616,899 22,434,673 6,023365 11378,076 16,720,644 12,246,207 27,924,737 16,847,833 14,231334 13,112,255 4,281,609 4,039,847 34,763,543 35,742,485 25,508387 23,949,156 31,749308 41,571,149 23429306 31,541,860 Emission Trends http://www.epa.gov/docs/acidrain/ardhome.html ------- Emissions Trends Through 1994 Under the Acid [SO2 . NOx, and CO2 Emissions and Heat Input for 263 units in Table 1 of §73.10 Rain Program (a) of the Acid Rain Regulations] STATE PLANT NAME STACK/UNIT ID MONTROSE 1 CS023 (2,3) NEW MADRID 1 2 SIBLEY [1] 3 (CS0001-1-2) SIOUX 1 2 THOMAS HILL [5, 6] MB1 MB2 NEW HAMPSHIRE MERRIMACK 1 2 NEW JERSEY B L ENGLAND [5] 1 2 NEW YORK DUNKIRK [5, 6] CS0003 (3,4) GREENIDGE **6 MILLIKEN **1 **2 NORTHPORT 1 2 3 PORT JEFFERSON [2,5, 3 4 OHIO ASHTABULA 7 AVON LAKE 1 1 12 CARDINAL CS001 (1) 2 CONES VILLE CSO 1 2 ( 1 ,2) 3 4 EASTLAKE [5] 1 2 3 4 SO2 Emissions (tons) 1980 1985 1990 1994 62,150 28,740 3,010 4,552 103,780 67,357 5,584 8,018 91,070 74,430 86,810 75,219 113,710 77,895 82,207 64,526 27,060 26,812 39,546 14,038 37,180 42,688 37,663 20,901 58,440 14,504 46,959 35,666 35,874 35,874 22,596 10,669 56,866 56,866 27,005 15,812 14,560 15,258 13,128 16,200 38,940 38,980 27,047 26,175 17,260 16,300 14,367 16,788 16,580 17,822 17,150 16,605 32,230 35,060 44,929 30,925 11.548 11,548 12,448 10,368 13,990 9,400 16,588 16,074 15,630 15,398 16,662 8,094 20,870 27,360 9,555 3,146 19,330 26,583 9,749 7,226 21,710 25,915 9,896 4,958 10,420 10,602 5,387 3,982 13,370 12,195 4,519 4,231 7,260 37,621 36,310 45,789 16,952 16,952 0 0 41,322 41,322 69,097 17,874 31,200 69,012 60,630 74,625 32,900 71,532 86,993 64369 54,710 13,476 17,206 22,318 32,880 9,646 7,618 10,637 71,660 98,256 78,374 74,232 18,280 16,550 15,468 16,648 17,080 17,267 13,212 17330 15,380 19,545 18,486 21,623 27,910 24,997 25,819 9,752 NOx Emissions (tons) 1985 1990 1994 2,492 3,565 2,606 5,959 6,630 4,823 22,072 27,606 25,791 22,812 29,156 22,663 10,648 14,667 15,862 16,199 16,250 8,244 5,733 21,220 11,621 8,362 5,321 2,571 13,292 6,729 4,265 5,876 6,083 6,086 14,972 12,344 22,213 5,951 4,962 3,468 6,405 5,939 3,772 6,860 7,644 4,493 2,169 2,287 2,023 1,992 3,346 2,564 3,270 3,308 1,704 2,863 2,519 654 2,792 2,570 1,896 2,718 2,609 1,204 1,113 1,420 904 1,273 1,191 1,077 4,933 3,477 4,855 2,631 0 0 8,883 15,142 9,357 11,768 11,312 16,452 12,351 15,768 13,840 2,998 5,459 5,059 1,788 1,378 2,034 12,602 9,926 9,287 2,156 1,854 2,228 2,255 1,596 1,719 2,554 2,216 2,275 3,285 3,078 1,198 CO2 (tons) 1994 1,220,984 2,197,282 3394,004 3378,416 2,700,589 1357,873 1,906,233 572,208 943,407 1,017320 2,258,295 275,571 351,867 1,924388 748,914 1,245,222 664,644 483,517 1,193,407 842,858 665,658 708323 1366,284 1,953,989 3389,077 2,708,960 999,775 487,463 3356,210 823332 931,776 821,462 474,008 Heat Input (mmBtu) 1990 1994 7,955,611 11,442,252 14,791,074 20,635,036 32,464,734 38,293,812 33364478 36,504,520 15,017,658 21,560,740 19,563,242 13,225,030 25,089,797 18,578,789 6,011328 5,521,298 7,560,732 8,950,590 8,718,106 9,912,691 17,680,122 21,949384 6,753329 7,639,911 8,094,615 7,566,781 26,685,270 19,168,081 7,472,408 7,299326 10,934,170 12,136,666 10,821,880 5,999,067 18,108,559 5,427,785 18,464,417 13,509,761 18,752,898 9,528,286 10,192390 7,481,621 8,549,043 7,963,090 11,452,060 13314,018 0 0 35,406,997 19,044,710 25,914,545 30,811,442 36,206,761 26,402388 7,177,460 9359,696 3,204,027 4,676,631 32,276399 32,554380 6,211,667 8,651,530 5349^70 9,188,122 7,420,918 7,801^65 10356,064 4,614,801 Emission Trends 12 http://www.epa.gov/doos/acidrain/ardhome.html ------- Emissions Trends Through 1994 Under the Acid Rain Program [SO2, NOx, and CO 2 Emissions and Heat Input for 263 units in Table 1 of§73.10 (a) of the Acid Rain Regulations] STATE PENNSYLVANIA PLANT NAME STACK/UNIT ID 5 EDGE WATER 13 GEN J M GAVIN CSO 12(1,2) KYGER CREEK CS001 (1,2,3,4,5) MIAMI FORT [5] CS056 (6, 5-1, 5-2) 5 6 7 MUSKINGUM RIVER CS014 (1,2,3,4) 5 NILES 1 2 PICWAY 9 RE BURGER [1, 4, 6] CS0001-1234 (5, 6, 7, 8) 5 6 7 8 W H SAMMIS [5, 6] 5 MS6A/MS6B (6) 7 WALTER C BECKJORD MS51/MS52(5) 6 ARMSTRONG 1 2 BRUNNER ISLAND CS102(1,2) 3 CHESWICK 1 CONEMAUGH [5, 6] 1 2 HATFIELD'S FERRY CS001/CS002 (1, 2, 3) 1 2 3 MARTINS CREEK CS 1 02 ( 1 ,2) SO2 Emissions (tons) 1980 1985 1990 1994 79,780 79,918 71,595 69,779 6,149 6,149 7,393 0 368,380 363,249 374,920 382,947 207,620 222,543 249,418 234,171 14,292 21,373 23,001 6,533 38,530 62,456 64,029 46,702 168,250 154,528 144,597 108,723 82,580 98,907 96,272 95318 13,600 14,054 16,082 13,361 11,510 16,264 13,999 15,584 13,671 13,671 15,207 25,276 81,467 60,894 62,597 66,897 19,320 34,632 27,869 26,687 34,000 61,391 55,151 47,888 32,160 54,557 57,748 58,205 18,680 12,735 40,071 9,507 30,310 39,140 52,841 29,426 16,880 16,434 16,961 19,155 16,360 15,423 14,780 6,688 71,830 66,181 71,362 52,738 70,590 58,775 56,798 49,047 41,460 41,927 41,279 51,010 106,280 92,088 79,232 76,893 104,110 89,804 100,056 102,931 175,630 161,081 163,432 168,526 32,640 28,758 25,637 12,812 NOx Emissions (tons) 1985 1990 1994 14,441 12,209 10,446 2,101 2,004 0 28,092 26,439 81,939 54,394 57,472 56,214 256 162 67 3,872 3,640 2,145 14,499 14,346 13,509 33,066 31,267 16,969 12,170 12,482 11,812 4,372 5,252 2,804 5,045 4,546 3,115 2,067 2,804 3358 1,153 866 1,242 1,121 902 1,242 3,638 4,876 564 4,555 4,693 324 8,676 7,139 5,464 15,378 14,272 8,024 13,119 14,960 23,726 2,496 5,459 7,244 6,516 9,291 6350 4,883 5,120 6346 4,651 4,477 2,215 14,377 14,125 8,275 12,752 11,174 144*03 9,905 9,984 8,571 16,107 15,087 47,768 15,633 18,141 41,615 39,434 39,640 40,179 8,672 7,040 3,429 CO2 (tons) 1994 3335,859 0 13,980,425 7,883,208 716,262 2,614,715 3,204,287 2,841,616 574,644 672,755 916,592 2,974,282 2^45,193 4,038,089 4,506,967 1313,171 2,164,751 1350,681 464,293 4,067,805 3,708,230 4,195,847 4,970,246 6,639,118 10,249,571 1,036,966 Heat Input (mmBtu) 1220. 1994 29,347,836 32,441306 4,523,862 0 128,558,209 136,707,473 80,594,734 76,834386 412,832 578,856 11,121,330 M99.419 31^10,606 25384,733 40,494,779 30,999,441 27,307,057 27,696,066 6,748351 5,600,821 5,805,523 6,557,064 6,120,970 8,617,169 1,937,572 1,859339 2,017,716 1,936,246 10,937,084 10,495,478 10,530,541 10,105350 16,637,923 21,875,417 33,227,968 39352,940 34,972,971 43,911,550 16,673,747 12,777,991 28,603,094 21,081,619 11,992,808 13,164,550 10,473,815 4,525,284 46,533,995 38,875,764 36,762,623 35,110,760 32,899,426 40,644,776 49,756,638 48,879,879 59,762,954 64,897,455 34,304,196 31,827,188 36,257,651 31,842,813 27,563,857 36,208,556 17,091,694 9,918,872 Emission Trends 13 http://www.epa.gov/doos/aoidrain/ardhome.html ------- S1AIE TENNESSEE WEST VIRGINIA WISCONSIN Emissions Trends Through 1994 Under the Acid Rain Program [SO2 , NOx, and CO 2 Emissions and Heat Input for 263 units in Table 1 of§73.10 (a) of the Acid Rain Regulations] PLANT NAME STACK/UNIT ID PORTLAND 1 2 SHAWVILLE [5, 6] 1 2 CS1 (3,4) SUNBURY 3 4 ALLEN 1 2 3 CUMBERLAND [5, 6] 1 2 GALLATIN CSGA12 (1,2) CSGA34 (3,4) JOHNSONVILLE CSJO10 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) ALBRIGHT 3 FORT MARTIN 1 2 HARRISON CS001/CS002 (1, 2, 3) 1 2 3 KAMMER CS013 (1,2,3) MITCHELL CS012 (1,2) MT STORM [3, 6] CSO (1,2) 3 EDGEWATER 4 GENOA 1 NELSON DEWEY CS1 (1,2) NORTH OAK CREEK 1 2 3 4 SO2 Emissions (tons) 1980 1985 1990 1994 14,050 6,436 9,798 8,762 18,870 10,892 15,627 14,552 14,920 13,485 11,631 11,883 13,040 14,310 11,894 12,251 38,280 36,375 33,724 24,078 4,560 10,046 10,898 7,524 7,550 14,077 12,428 11,729 22,500 21,866 27,967 25,655 25,130 25,986 19,623 24,681 27,840 19,696 11,728 27,313 212,000 148,104 187,582 121,400 155,970 196,049 115,767 154,811 61,260 59,256 71,196 52,167 79,350 71,140 69,801 70,698 138,270 96,124 86,687 131,645 12,380 11,938 9,779 10,469 48,500 44,309 36,064 42,990 49,520 44,824 47,470 43,726 221,390 234,693 289,733 261,018 153,020 157,034 155,373 143,555 174,910 103,326 60,875 81,635 60,480 84,404 96,386 107,165 32,860 43,906 45,453 29,536 50,680 39,722 33,528 21,145 18,400 35,035 29,286 15,024 29,930 25,562 5,798 3,718 9,180 6,810 0 0 12,640 7,916 0 0 12,240 7,184 0 0 12,340 9,323 0 0 NOx Emissions (tons) 198S 1990 1994 1,245 2,023 1,102 2,146 3,187 1,841 3,598 3,464 1,952 3,834 3,358 4,357 6,969 6,695 5,736 3,092 2,829 1,162 4,332 3,244 4,343 9,581 12,956 15,737 11,073 9,203 18,589 8,526 5,355 16,149 28,647 36,893 52,037 37,786 22,753 45,950 8,319 9,822 7,037 9,961 9,617 9,403 24,337 23,304 29,427 2,414 2,304 3,472 9,463 7,809 10,791 13,384 14,480 17,662 40,976 51,051 41,660 35,135 34,616 28,792 36,138 25,228 23,139 18,158 20,911 30,475 9,454 9,809 20,735 16,389 16,577 12,359 6,843 5,101 2,868 10,016 9,202 4,626 1,594 0 0 1,802 0 0 1,640 0 0 2,133 0 0 CO2 (tons) 1994 665,535 1,142,443 791,898 859,462 1,767,982 543^86 855,862 1,568,265 1,796,023 1,716,656 6,836403 7333,725 2,745^42 3,705,861 9,495,062 899,435 3,422,958 3460,751 12354,426 4,519493 8,628,998 8,818,097 3,955,758 2,167,193 1,620,667 1339,423 0 0 0 0 Heat Input (mmBtu) 1990 1224 7,215,528 6,146,167 11,249,322 11,126,070 8,047,484 7,718315 7,790,223 8376,823 •21,812,422 17431,742 6,606,457 4,941,904 7,688,370 8,181,812 16,341,809 14,002,150 11,648,900 17492,406 6,833,948 16,534436 81,356,163 66,445322 49,962,551 67,998,977 31,650,982 26,756,978 31,070,413 36,135412 62,001,260 90,744,914 7,682,667 8,766,413 26,207,504 33362409 34,646,420 31,781420 44,520,158 37,195461 40,034,198 43,813,757 43,113,736 40,837335 45,191,087 42,498,721 57,649,254 82498,776 68,831,474 68,831,474 32,653,966 32,653,966 18,981,488 20,614,720 13,996,932 15,504,668 9,883,777 13,054,049 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Emission Trends 14 http://www.epa.gov/docs/aoidrain/ardhome.htm] ------- Emissions Trends Through 1994 Under the Acid Rain Program [SO2, NOx, and CO2 Emissions and Heat Input for 263 units in Table 1 of§ 73.10 (a) of the Acid Rain Regulations] STATE PLANT NAME STACK/UNIT ID PULLIAM 8 SOUTH OAK CREEK CS3 (5,6) CS4 (7,8) NATIONAL TOTALS (Phase L Table 1 units.) SO2 Emissions (tons) 1980 1985 1990 1994 14,670 10,446 11,151 2,723 23,990 34,334 19,412 8,348 26,090 50,441 35,634 11,706 9,370,633 9,301,985 8,683,230 7379304 NOx Emissions (tons) 1985 1990 1994 2,534 3,190 1,671 7,916 6,326 2,878 8,186 7,991 9,731 2,011,486 1,998,720 1,919,532 CO2 (tons) 1994 904,050 2362,809 3,195,404 465397,208 Heat Input (mmBtu) 1990 1994 6,786,218 8^40,759 15,737,015 22,679,084 27,576,341 31,144,184 4,382,498,826 4.468,650,992 General Notes: 1. Known as Table 1 units, the 263 units appearing here are those listed in Table 1 of 40 CFR 73.10 (a) of the Acid Rain Regulations. 2. In the Stack/Unit ID column, the designation "CS" indicates that the emission values are for a "common stack" combining the emissions from multiple units. For example, "CS1 (3,4)" designates emission values for common stack CS1, which includes the emissions from units #3 and #4. 3. Occasionally, there are differences between the monitoring configuration used for NOx and that used for SO2 and CO2. In particular, SO2 may be monitored at the common stack level while NOx is monitored at the unit level. In such cases, separate lines will be shown in the table for the monitored common stack and each of the monitored separate units. For example, at J. H. Campbell, SO2 and CO2 emission values appear on a line designated CS0009 (1,2) while NOx emissions and heat input values appear on separate lines labeled "1" and "2" for each of the constituent units. 4. In the Stack/Unit ID column, the designation "MS" indicates that the emission values are for "multiple stacks" which exhaust the emissions from a single unit. For example, "MS4A/MS4B (4)" designates emissions from unit 4 which exhaust through MS4A and MS4B. 5. Asterisks appearing in the Stack/Unit ID column are part of the ID, not references to footnotes. 6. Zeroes appearing in the 1990 and 1994 columns indicate that the unit was retired from operation or non-operational in that year. 7. 1980 SO2 emissions are based on 1980 National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program (NAPAP) data and EPA's AP42 emission factors. NAPAP data is reported in "The NAPAP Utility Reference File for 1980" (EPA-600/7-86-056a), December 1986, prepared for U.S. EPA Air and Energy Research Laboratory by E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. 8. 1985 SO2 emissions are from the National Allowance Data Base (NADB, referenced in the March 23,1993 Federal Register Volume 58 No. 54) and EPA's AP42 emission factors. NADB data is reported in "The National Allowances Data Base, Version 3.11, Technical Support Document," June 1995, prepared for U.S. EPA Office of Atmospheric Programs by E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. 9. 1990 SO2,1985 NOx, and 1990 NOx emissions are based on U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration's Form EIA-767 data and EPA's AP42 emission factors as described in "National Air Pollution Emission Trends, 1900-1993" (EPA-454/R-94-027), October 1994, prepared for EPA's Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards by E.H. Pechan & Associates. 10. 1990 heat input are the values reported by utilities on Form EIA-767 to the U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration. 11. 1994 emissions and heat input values were derived from long-term hourly data collected using Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems (CEMS). The data were obtained from the Quarterly Data Files submitted by utilities in compliance with Phase I of the Acid Rain Program. Except as noted in the footnotes below, the following procedures were used in computing the indicated 1994 values: SO2 The values shown in the 1994 SO2 emissions column are the higher of a) the reported cumulative annual SO2 tons emitted (as reported by the utility in RT 301/26), and b) the EPA calculated sum of the hourly SO2 emissions (as reported by the utility in RT310/25) weighted by the operating time (as reported by the utility in RT 300/18). The designation (RTxxx/yy) refers to Record Type xxx and Start Column yy as found in EPA's "Electronic Data Reporting," version 1.1. NOx The values shown in the 1994 NOx emissions column represent the product of the heat input (RT300/36) and the NOx emission rate (RT 320/42) for each hour summed over the entire year. Emission Trends 15 http://www.epa. gov/docs/acidrain/ardhome.html ------- Emissions Trends Through 1994 Under the Acid Rain Program [SO2 , NOx, and CO 2 Emissions and Heat Input for 263 units in Table I of§73.10 (a) of the Acid Rain Regulations] CO2 The values shown in the 1994 CO2 emissions column are the reported cumulative annual CO2 tons emitted that appears in RT 301/72. Heat Input The values shown in the 1994 heat input column are the reported cumulative annual heat inputs (RT301/92). 12. Statutory NOx emission limits have been established for 168 of the 263 units shown in this table. These units are known as Phase I, Group 1 boilers. Those with tangentially fired boilers have an emission limit of 0.45 Ib/mmBtu, whereas wall-fired units have an emission limit of 0.50 Ib/mmBtu. Footnotes: [ 1 ] For Table 1 units sharing a common stack with reporting substitution units, the values appearing in the 1994 SO2 emissions column represent an apportionment of reported emissions between the Table 1 and substitution units. The apportionment was performed to allow publishing baseline emissions data for Table 1 sources only. The common stacks falling in this category include H T Pritchard CS596, High Bridge CS0001, Sibley CS0001, and R E Burger CS0001. The apportionment is denoted in the "STACK/UNIT ID" column by a subtraction of the appropriate unit ID's from the common stack ID. For example, the designation "6 (CS596-5)" indicates that the emissions value for H.T. Pritchard unit 6 was obtained by subtracting the emissions of unit 5 from the emissions reported for common stack CS596. [2] For Port Jefferson units 3 and 4, the values appearing in the 1994 SO2 emissions column are based on the EPA calculated sum of the reported hourly SO2 emissions (RT310/25) weighted by the reported operating time (RT300/18), since an error caused an incorrectly high value for the reported cumulative annual SO2 emitted (RT301/26). [3] For Mt. Storm common stack CSO and unit 3, all 1994 values are not the ones reported but are estimates. Technical problems with the plant's monitoring instrumentation in the first three quarters of 1994, produced severely incorrect annual heat input and emissions values. Therefore, SO2 and CO2 annual emissions were estimated from fourth quarter data. For SO2 the sum of the hourly SO2 emissions adjusted for bias (RT310/25) weighted by the reported operating time (RT300/18) was multiplied by four. For CO2 the reported fourth quarter emissions value (RT301/62) were multiplied by four. 1994 NOx mass emissions were estimated by calculating the product of the 1990 heat input times the pre-control emission rate. Heat input for 1990 was used as an estimate for the 1994 heat input. [4] For R.E. Burger units 5 and 6 no hourly heat input (RT300/36) data were reported. This prevented calculation of annual NOx mass emissions. An estimate of annual NOx emissions was derived by multiplying the reported annual heat input (RT301/92) by the annual average NOx emission rate (RT301/49). [5] When the value reported as the 1994 cumulative annual CO2 emissions (RT301/72) differed by more than 5% from the year's sum of the quarterly CO2 values (RT301/62) reported for the year, then a case-by-case examination was made of the reported data to determine if the reported cumulative annual value was most reasonable. Based on such an evaluation, the sum of reported quarterly CO2 values was used, rather than the reported cumulative annual CO2 value, for Big Bend, Cooper, H. L. Spurlock, Thomas Hill, B. L. England, Dunkirk, Port Jefferson, Eastlake, Miami Fort, W. H. Sammis, Conemaugh, Shawville, and Cumberland. [6] When the value reported as the 1994 cumulative annual heat input (RT301/92) differed by more than 10% from the year's sum of the quarterly heat input values (RT301/82) reported for the year, then a case-by-case examination was made of the reported data to determine if the reported cumulative annual value was most reasonable. Based on such an evaluation, the sum of reported quarterly heat input values was used, rather than the reported cumulative annual heat input value, for Big Bend, Burlington, H. L. Spurlock, Thomas Hill, Port Jefferson, W. H. Sammis, Conemaugh, Shawville, and Cumberland. For Warrick, Cooper, and Dunkirk the 1994 heat input was calculated from the year's sum of hourly reported heat input (RT 300/36). For Elmer Smith, R. E. Burger, and Mt. Storm the 1990 heat input value was substituted for the 1994 heat input. [7] Due to a problem in the fourth quarter heat input data, the 1994 heat input for Chalk Point was estimated from the quarterly values reported in the first three quarters. Emission Trends 16 http://www.qM.gov/docs/aoidrain/ardhome.htnil ------- |