Ecological Research Series
PLANT  UPTAKE OF  CADMIUM FROM
              PHOSPHATE  FERTILIZER
                      Environmental Research Laboratory
                     Office of Research and Development
                    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                            Corvallis, Oregon 97330


-------
                 RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES

Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, have  been grouped  into five series. These five broad
categories were established to facilitate further development and application of
environmental technology.  Elimination of traditional grouping was consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields.
The five series are:

     1.    Environmental Health Effects Research
     2.    Environmental Protection Technology
     3.    Ecological Research
     4.    Environmental Monitoring
     5.    Socioeconomic Environmental Studies

This report has been assigned to the ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH series. This series
describes research on the effects  of pollution on humans, plant  and animal
species,  and materials.  Problems are assessed for their long-  and short-term
influences.  Investigations include formation, transport, and pathway studies to
determine the fate of pollutants and their effects. This work provides the technical
basis for setting standards to minimize undesirable changes in living organisms
in the aquatic, terrestrial, and atmospheric environments.
This document is available to the public through the National Technical Informa-
tion Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161.

-------
                                               EPA-600/3-76-053
                                               May 1976
PLANT UPTAKE OF CADMIUM FROM PHOSPHATE FERTILIZER
                       by

  John Reuss, H. L. Dooley, and William Griffis

      Ecological Effects Research Division
   Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
            Corvallis, Oregon  97330
      U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
       OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
   CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
            CORVALLIS, OREGON  97330

-------
                              DISCLAIMER
     This report has been reviewed by the Corvallis Environmental Research
Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved for
publication.  Mention of trade names or commercial product does not
constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                  1,1

-------
                         CONTENTS
                                                    Paqe
List of Figures                                     -jv
List of Tables                                       v
Acknowledgements                                    vi
I    Introduction                                    1
II   Conclusions                                     2
III  Recommendations                                 3
IV   Materials and Methods                           4
V    Results and Discussion                          9
VI   References                                     24
VII  Appendix A                                     25
        Synthesis of Cadmium Dihydrogen Phosphate
     Appendix B                                     26
        List of Data Tables

-------
                            LIST OF FIGURES

                                                                 Page

1.   Cadmium concentration in radishes grown on Westport          11
     fine sand as a function of Cd in concentrated super
     phosphate fertilizer (CSP).

2.   Cadmium concentration in lettuce grown on Westport           12
     fine sand as a function of Cd in concentrated super
     phosphate fertilizer (CSP).

3.   Cadmium concentration in peas grown on Westport fine         13
     sand as a function of Cd in concentrated super
     phosphate fertilizer (CSP).

4.   Cadmium concentration in radishes grown on Virtue            14
     silt loam as a function of Cd in concentrated super
     phosphate fertilizer (CSP).

5.   Cadmium concentration in lettuce grown on Virtue             15
     silt loam as a function of Cd in concentrated super
     phosphate fertilizer (CSP).
                                   IV

-------
                            LIST OF TABLES

                                                                 Page
1.   Characteristics of soils used in the Cd uptake                5
     experiment.

2.   Treatment materials, amounts and method of application         6
     for Cadmium uptake experiment.

3.   Cadmium levels resulting from treatments 1-7 of the Cd         7
     uptake experiment (yg Cd/g soil).

4.   Factors and levels used in Treatments 7-14.                    7

5.   Dry matter percentage, dry weight yields, and plant P
     concentrations for treatments 1-7 of Cd uptake experi-        10
     ment.  Values represent means of 14 pots.

6.   Summary of the slope and intercepts of the regression        17
     of plant Cd concentration on Cd added in fertilizer,
     and percentage of added Cd found in plants.

7.   Cadmium concentrations in plants grown on Westport           19
     fine sand as affected by fertilizer material, place-
     ment and source of Cd.

8.   Cadmium concentration in plants grown on Virtue silt        20
     loam soil as affected by fertilizer material, placement
     and source of Cd.

9.   Summary of means of major placement and fertilizer          21
     material effects on dry matter yields.

10.  Summary of means of major placement and fertilizer          22
     material effects on plant phosphorus concentrations.

-------
                           ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

     This investigation was made possible by the contributions and
support of many people.  Among others we would like to acknowledge the
help of Dr. Gerald Simmonson of the Oregon State University Soil  Science
Department and Fred Gilderman and Burrel Lovell  of the USDA Soil  Conser-
vation Service for assistance in obtaining the soils.

     We would particularly like to thank Dan Krawczyk and the personnel
of the CERL Laboratory Services Branch for their effort in providing the
analyses of the plant samples and Ron Silberman  for his help with the
statistical analyses.

     The investigation was suggested by Region 10 personnel.  Fertilizer
samples were obtained by Carolyn Wilson of the Region 10 office,  who
also made valuable suggestions concerning the manuscript, as did  Dr.
Dave Tingey of the CERL.  Fertilizer analyses were performed by the
Region 10 laboratory.  Seeds were furnished by Northrup King.

-------
                               SECTION I

                             INTRODUCTION

     The cadmium (Cd) content of phosphate ores used in fertilizer
manufacture is highly variable.  Values of 130 mg Cd per kg for ores
from the western United States as compared to 9 mg/kg for Florida ores
have recently been published (Anon. 1974).  In 11 samples of 18-46-0 (N,
PO^S' KpO), presumably of Idaho origin, the Cd content ranged from 7.4
to T56 mg/kg.-   Ten of the samples exceeded 50 mg/kg and 6 exceeded 125
mg/kg.  Seven samples of 0-46-0 ranged from 86 to 114 mg Cd per kg.

     A substantial body of literature is available concerning uptake of
Cd by plants, but in most cases reported levels applied to the soil were
much higher than would occur due to the Cd content of phosphate fertili-
zers.  Reports of Schroeder and Balassa (1963) and Williams and David
(1973) indicate that detectable amounts may be taken up from this
source.  This report describes an experiment conducted to evaluate
uptake of Cd by some common food crop plants from phosphate fertilizers
containing levels of Cd commonly encountered in materials manufactured
from western ores.  The work was undertaken in response to a request
from the U.S.. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 personnel for
assistance in evaluating the possibility of undesirable Cd levels in
foodstuffs resulting from use of these fertilizers.  Specific objectives
of the project include:

     a.   To provide information concerning the probability that plant
          Cd levels of biological significance to consuming organisms
          would occur as a result of use of high Cd fertilizers.

     b.   To provide information concerning the effect of soil proper-
          ties and the chemical form and placement of phosphate fer-
          tilizer on Cd uptake.


     It was not possible to test a large number of soils for Cd
uptake within the scope of this project.  Therefore, it was decided to
restrict these initial studies to+two soils:  (1) an acid coarse textured
soil in which the activity of Cd   would remain relatively high and
favor plant uptake and (2) a medium textured soil containing free CaCO.,
which would tend to depress Cd solubility and uptake.

     The results reported here are preliminary and the data will be
subjected to further analysis.  Also considerable care is required in
projecting greenhouse experiment results to field conditions.
—'  Unpublished data, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10.
   Seattle.
                                   1

-------
                              SECTION II

                              CONCLUSIONS

1.   Uptake of cadmium contained in phosphatic fertilizers  by radish,
     lettuce and peas grown on a coarse textured acid soil  was shown  to
     be a linear function of the Cd concentration,  at least over the
     range of 0.0 to 0.087 yg Cd per g soil.   The Cd concentration  in
     lettuce was over 6 yg/g dry weight when  fertilized at  the rate of
     100 yg P/g soil with concentrated super  phosphate (CSP) containing
     174 yg Cd/g fertilizer (0.087 yg Cd/g soil).   Percentage of Cd in
     fertilizer recovered in the plants was 5.3, 9.0, and 2.0 for the
     radish (top plus root), lettuce (tops),  and peas (foliage plus
     seeds), respectively.  These uptakes may be of sufficient magnitude
     to be of biological significance to  consumer organisms.

2.   Uptake of Cd in fertilizer was also  linear from a calcareous silt
     loam soil, but was much lower than from  the acid sand.  The Cd
     concentration in lettuce was 1.2 yg/g dry weight when  fertilized  at
     the rate of 100 yg P/g soil with CSP containing 174 yg Cd/g ferti-
     lizer (0.087 yg Cd/g soil).  Percentages of Cd recovered in the
     plants were 0.6 in radish and 0.8 in lettuce.   Background levels  on
     the calcareous silt loam soil were higher than those on the acid
     sand.  Cd levels in peas grown on the calcareous soil  were below
     the detection limit of 0.20 yg Cd/g  dry  weight.

3.   Plant uptake of cadmium from di-ammonium phosphate (DAP) fertilizer
     on an acid course textured soil was  markedly reduced when this
     material  was applied in a single spot as compared to mixing through-
     out the pot.  Cd uptake from mixed DAP was similar to  that from  CSP
     applied either mixed or in a spot.  Placement  effects  in a calcar-
     eous silt loam were smaller than those in the  acid coarse textured
     sand.

-------
                              SECTION III

                            RECOMMENDATIONS

     This investigation was intended to be preliminary in nature.
Uptake of cadmium from phosphate fertilizer materials appears to be high
enough to warrant further investigation.  Results indicate three areas
of particular interest.

     (1)  Uptake of Cd by food crops from phosphate fertilizers applied
to acid soils of low cation exchange capacity.

     (2)  The effects of cummulative doses of high Cd fertilizers  on
acid soils and on soils that do not maintain high Cd activity such as
the calcareous silt loam used in this study is not known and should be
investigated.

     (3)  The reduced Cd uptake by spot (or band) placement of di-
ammonium phosphate fertilizer should be further investigated.  The
results shown here suggest that this placement might have potential as a
management technique to reduce Cd uptake on coarse textured soils.  The
theoretical soil chemistry of this effect should be understood as  well
as possible field applications.

-------
                              SECTION IV

                         MATERIALS AND METHODS

     The two soils selected for the experiment were (1) Westport fine
sand (Typic udipsamment), an acid dune soil  from near Bandon, Oregon;
and (2) Virtue silt loam (Xerollic durargid), a calcareous soil  from
near Nyssa, Oregon.

     Soils were dried, mixed, and crushed to pass a 1/2 cm screen prior
to potting.  Plants were grown in paraffin coated paper containers
approximately 20 cm in diameter and each containing 4 kg air dry soil.
Selected soil properties are shown in Table 1.  Due to the low organic
matter content, 2 1/2 percent by weight of an acid peat was mixed with
the Westport soil to improve water holding capacity.  Analyses of the
Westport soil shown in Table 1 were from samples taken after the peat
was added.  Measured pH of the Westport soil varied from 4.5 to 5.3 when
sampled at different times.  These differences were apparently due to
low buffering capacity.

     Fertilizer materials used in this study were obtained by Region 10
EPA personnel.  They included concentrated superphosphate (CSP)  and di-
ammonium phosphate (DAP) with a low and high cadmium level sample of
each (Table 2).  While both CSP samples were nominally 0-46-0 (N, PpOj-,
K?0) and both DAP samples were nominally 18-46-0, they were from entirely
different sources.

     The treatment set utilized is shown in Table 2.  In addition to the
above materials, reagent grade monocalcium phosphate dihydrate (MCP),
and cadmium dihydrogen phosphate prepared in the laboratory (Appendix
A), were utilized in selected treatments.  The ammonium nitrate (AN)
added to the CSP treatments supplies the same total N as the DAP treat-
ments.  All treatments supply a total of 100 yg P (245 yg PpOc) Per g of
soil.  In addition to the materials shown in Table 2, 0.39 g KNO- and
0.34 g KpSO. were mixed with the soil in each pot to supply K, S; and
additional R.

     The treatment set shown in Table 2 contains two subsets, each
designed to yield specific information.  Treatments 1-7 supply increa-
sing amounts of Cd in the range of 0 to .087 yg Cd per g soil as shown
in Table 3.  All treatments in this subset utilize CSP as a fertilizer
source and all treatments were thoroughly mixed with the soil utilizing
a twin shell blender.  Treatments 7-14 comprise a 2  factorial experi-
ment with factors and levels as shown in Table 4.  This set is designed
to evaluate the effect of cadmium source, fertilizer material (CSP vs
DAP), and mix vs spot application, on uptake of Cd by the plants.  The
spot application is intended to simulate band application in the field.
In this method all treatment materials were placed in a single spot
located at the center of the pot and 5 cm below the soil surface.
Lateral distance from the seeds to the spot was also approximately 5 cm.

-------
TABLE 1.  CHARACTERISTICS OF SOILS USED IN THE Cd UPTAKE EXPERIMENT.


pH
1:2 Soil: water
Organic matter
Wet digestion
Total Nitrogen
Kjeldahl
Cation exch. Cap.
Neutral f[ NH40 Ac
Extractable P-/
Free carbonates
Total Cadmium
Soluble Cadmium-


Percent
Percent
m. eq/lOOg
yg/g
Percent as
yg/g.
yg/g.
Westport
Fine Sand

4.5
0.6
.01
2.2
11
CaC03 0.0
<0.5
0.05
Virtue
Silt Loam

8.4
1.19
.08
20.0
13
2.2
0.6
0.1

   NaHC03 extraction for Virtue soil, dilute HC1-NH4F for Westport soil
— '
— '  Total Ammonium Acetate Extractable.

-------
TABLE 2.  TREATMENT MATERIALS, AMOUNTS AND METHOD OF APPLICATION
          FOR CADMIUM UPTAKE EXPERIMENT


Treatment
No.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

MCP
Low


1.64
2.0
-- 1.6
-- 1.2
.8
.4
— —
__
__
__
-- 2.0
— 2.0
__
_ _ _ _
Materials
CSP DAP
High Low High

g/ put 	

__
.4
.8
1.2
1.6
2.0
2.0
-- 2.0
— 2.0
__
__
— 2.0 --
-- 2.0 --

AN


1.03
1.03
1.03
1.03
1.02
1.03
1.03
1.03
--
--
1.03
1.03
--
—

Cd-P

yg/pot










840
840
790
790
Method



Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Mix
Spot
Mix
Spot
Mix
Spot
Mix
Spot

MCP - Monocalcium phosphate, reagent
CSP (low) - concentrated super phosphate, 0-46-0 12 ppm Cd
CSP (high) - concentrated super phosphate, 0-46-0, 174 ppm Cd
DAP (low) - Di-ammonium phosphate, 18-46-0, 7 ppm Cd
DAP (high) - Di-ammonium phosphate, 18-46-0, 157 ppm Cd
Cd-P - Cadmium phosphate, Cd (H2P04)2, 39% Cd by analysis
AN - Ammonium nitrate, reagent.

-------
TABLE 3.  CADMIUM LEVELS RESULTING FROM TREATMENTS 1-7 OF THE Cd
          UPTAKE EXPERIMENT (yg Cd/g SOIL)
     Treatment
          Cd Concentration
              yg Cd/g
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0
.0065
.0226
.0387
.0548
.0709
.0870

         TABLE 4.  FACTORS AND LEVELS USED IN TREATMENTS 7-14
Fertilizer Material
Placement
Cd Source
1.   Concentrated super
     phosphate, 0-46-0
1.   Mixed with soil
2.  Di-ammonium phosphate,    2.  Spot application
     18-46-0
    High Cd
     fertilizer

    Cd (H2P04)2
     addea to tow
     Cd fertilizer

-------
The Cd source comparison is intended to evaluate the effect of adding
Cd(H2P04)2 as compared to a similar amount of native Cd in the fertilizer.
In tne factorial subset all DAP treatments contain a total of .080 yg Cd
per g soil while all CSP treatments contain .087 yg/g.

     Three common garden crops were grown:  garden peas, Pi sum sativum
L. cultivar Little Marvel; radish, Raphanus sativus L., cult, early
Scarbet Globe; and leaf lettuce, Lactuca sativa L., var. crispa cult.
Oak Leaf.  Two replications were placed in a completely random arrange-
ment.  Total pots in the experiment numbered 168.  Pots were planted
March 27, 1975 with the exception of the garden peas on the Westport
soil which were planted April 4.  Plants were thinned to 6 plants per
pot for radishes and lettuce and 3 plants per pot for peas shortly after
emergence.  Daytime temperature in the greenhouse were 75°F +_ 5°; and
night temperatures were 65° +_ 5°.

     Field capacity moisture percentages (W/W) were determined for each
soil by applying water to the surface of a soil column and gravimetri-
cally determining the soil water content above the wetting front after
allowing a 24 hour equilbration period.  Pots were weighed daily and
deionized distilled .water added to replace loss by evaportranspiration.
Initially the total weight maintained corresponded to about 75 percent
of field capacity.  This total weight increased to field capacity as
roots were established and evaporative demand increased.

     Radishes were harvested May 1.  The edible root portions and the
tops were harvested separately.  Plants were rinsed with deionized
water, fresh weight determined and dry weight determined after freeze
drying.  Lettuce was harvested May 8.  The tap root constituted only a
very small portion of the total weight and this was not included in the
foliar sample.  Peas were harvested May 28 from the Virtue soil and June
2 from the Westport soil.  Samples from these crops were handled in the
same manner as the radishes.  Pea materials were not rinsed except for a
few basal portions of the stems that were contaminated with soil.

     For total Kjeldahl nitrogen and total phosphorus determinations 50
mg plant samples were digested in a block digester using H^SO. and HgO
(Kjeldahl method).  Colorimetric determinations were then carried out
with an automated analyzer.  For total Kjeldahl nitrogen, NH»  was
determined using the indophenol blue color formed from reaction with
sodium phenate and hypochlorite ion.  Phosphorus was determined using
molybdo-phosphoric acid reduced to molybdenum blue complex with ascorbic
acid.

     Cadmium analyses were carried out using approximately a 1 g sample
digested in a block digestor with 2:1 nitric-perchloric acid, followed
by Cd determination on an atomic adsorption spectrophotometer.  Zinc
analyses are in progress and will be reported later.

-------
                               SECTION V

                        RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

REPLACEMENT SERIES TREATMENTS

     Results from the two treatment subsets were quite different and
will be discussed separately.  The progressive replacement of the low Cd
CSP source with the high Cd CSP did not detectably affect dry matter
yields for any of the crops on either soil.  Mean dry matter yields and
percentages are summarized in Table 5.  Treatment means and standard
errors are included in Appendix B.  Plants in treatments 1-7 generally
appeared healthy and grew well with the exception that the pea vines in
some pots exhibited early senescence and yields of both pea foliage and
seeds was highly variable.  This was apparently unrelated to treatment.
The lack of any growth effects due to treatments simplifies interpre-
tation of the cadmium concentration data as dilution or concentration
effects due to growth differences are not likely to be important.

     Mean plant phosphorus concentrations are shown in Table 5.  Phosphorus
concentrations by individual treatments are included in Appendix B.  In
most cases, the phosphorus concentrations in the plants were not affected
by treatment, but on the Virtue silt loam soil the probability of no
effects was <.05 for radish tops and <.01 for pea foliage.  The pattern
for the radish tops was not consistent, so the results may be spurious,
but in pea foliage on this soil the P concentration was depressed slightly
when the proportion of high Cd CSP was increased.  This was probably
related to the chemical properties of the fertilizers from the two
sources rather than any effect related to the Cd level.  These few
apparent effects on phosphorus concentration are probably not important
in terms of interpreting Cd effects in this portion of the experiment.

     The Cd concentrations in plants grown on Westport fine sand increased
markedly when high Cd CSP was substituted for low Cd CSP-  The results
were highly significant and could generally be represented by a linear
regression.  Plots and regression lines for the Westport soil are shown
in Figures 1-3.  Individual treatment means are included in Appendix B.
Some difficulty was encountered with the regression analysis of the pea
data from the Westport soil, where the low levels of fertilizer Cd
resulted in plant levels below the analytical detection limit of 0.20
yg/g.  In this case the value for the highest Cd treatment registering
at or below the detection limit was assumed to be 0.20 yg/g and values
from the lower treatment levels were not included in the regression.
This procedure resulted in 6 treatments being used to determine the
regression for pea seeds and 5 treatments for pea foliage.

     The effect on plant Cd concentration on the Virtue soil was not as
dramatic but was measurable for the radish and lettuce plots and regres-
sion lines for the Virtue soil are shown in Figures 4 and 5.  Pea seeds
and foliage from this soil were almost all below the detection limit of

-------
TABLE 5.  DRY MATTER PERCENTAGE, DRY WEIGHT YIELDS,  AND PLANT P  CONCENTRATIONS  FOR TREATMENTS  1-7
OF Cd UPTAKE EXPERIMENT, a/
Westport fine sand



Radish
Root
Top
Lettuce
Pea
Seeds
Foliage
Percent
Dry Matter
%

5.27
5.63
5.25

26.6
21.9
Dry
Matter
9/pot

3.67
3.84
5.52

4.80
8.77
Plant
P
i

.66
1.10
.46

.68
.35
Virtue silt loam
Percent
Dry Matter
%

5.88
7.15
4.82

31.5
48.1
Dry
Weight
g/pot

4.49
2.11
5.99

6.41
5.81
Plant
P
%

.35
.37
.49

.62
.19

a/  Values represent means of 14 pots.

-------
   4-0
0>
    3-0
o

o
o

•a
O
2-0
      0
     0
               West port  fine  sand

               Radish
          TOP

           y = -43 + 32-5x


          r2 = -966
                             ROOT

                               y  = -36 + 23-7 x

                              r2 = -986
0
             -02      -04      -06

           Cd  IN FERTILIZER
                                             08

                                              soil)
0
Figure  1. Cadmium concentration in radishes grown on Westport fine sand

        as a function of Cd in concentrated super phosphate fertilizer

        (CSP).
                           11

-------
    8-0
 D>
      0
o
o
o
o
    4-0
<  2-0
Q.

      0
   Westport  fine sand
   Lettuce

y  =  --05 + 68-1 x
-2  =  -97
         0       -02     -04      -06      -08      -10
               Cd  IN FERTILIZER (/zg/g soil)
Figure 2.  Cadmium concentration in lettuce grown on Westport fine sand
        as  a function of Cd in concentrated super phosphate fertilizer
        (CSP).
                           12

-------
 O
 O
 •o
 o
2-Or
 1-0
    0-5
      0
                   West port fine  sand
                   Pea
             A  SEED
                  y  = -15 + 10'
                 r2 = -93
         O FOLIAGE
             A
 y  = -16 + 3-7 x
r2 = -79
        h-6-6-
                                 detection limit
     0       -02     -04      -06
          Cd  IN FERTILIZER
                                             -08
                                              soil)
                                      10
Figure 3.  Cadmium concentration in peas grown on Westport fine sand as a
        function of Cd in concentrated super phosphate fertilizer (CSP).
                              13

-------
   2-0
o
o
o  i-o
O
h-
    0-5
      0
0
    Virtue  silt loam
    Radish
       TOP
            ROOT
              y  = -31 +  l-5x
              r2 = -472
   -02      -04      -06
Cd IN  FERTILIZER
                                              08
                                              soil)
10
Figure 4.  Cadmium concentration in radishes on Virtue silt loam as a function
         of Cd in concentrated super phosphate fertilizer (CSP).
                                14

-------
    2*0
en
\

o>
o


o
o  I.Q

-a
O
    0-5
      0
Virtue silt loam

Lettuce
      y  = -84 + 5-5


     r2 = -78
         0       -02      -04      -06      -08      -10

              Cd  IN FERTILIZER (/zg/g  soil)
 Figure 5.  Cadmium concentration in lettuce grown on Virtue silt loam as a


         function of Cd in concentrated super phosphate fertilizer (CSP).

-------
0.20 yg Cd/g and are not reported.  Cadmium concentrations in radish
tops and lettuce increased substantially as the proportion of high Cd
CSP was increased, but at a much lower rate than for the Westport soil.
Radish roots apparently increased slightly in Cd, but the hypothesis of
a zero slope could only be rejected at the 0.1  probability level  and not
at the 0.05 level.

     The effect of soils and crops can probably best be evaluated from
Table 6.  With the exception of radish roots the intercepts were  much
lower on the Westport fine sand than the Virtue silt loam, indicating a
higher background level from the Virtue soil as collected.  The Westport
soil was from a dune area and undoubtedly had never been fertilized.
The Virtue soil was from just outside a cultivated field near a country
road and while it apparently had not been fertilized, it's history is
less clear.  The total cadmium concentration for the Westport fine sand
was <0.5 yg/g and for the Virtue silt loam was  0.6 yg/g.  The exchange-
able (ammonium acetate extractable) cadmium concentration for Westport
fine sand was 0.05 yg/g and for Virtue silt loam was 0.1 yg/g.

     The most striking effects are in the slope and in the percentages
of the Cd applied in fertilizer that was found  in the plant.  For radish
plants this was 5.29% on the Westport fine sand compared to 0.61% for
the Virtue silt loam.  For lettuce the values were 9.40% and 0.82%
(Table 6).  This calculation was based on the slope of the regression
line, the mean dry matter produced and the amount of Cd contained in the
fertilizer.  The higher uptake for lettuce than radish is in agreement
with the results of Haghiri (1973) even though  he applied much higher
levels of Cd than are found in fertilizers.

     Cadmium concentrations and percentage uptake was less for peas than
radishes or lettuce.  The 5.3 and 2.0 percent of applied Cd found in the
radishes and pea plants respectively grown in Westport fine sand  (Table
6) are similar to the result of Williams and David (1973) who found 6.3
and 3.3% of the Cd applied in single superphosphate taken up by these
crops from podzolic soil with a cation exchange capacity (CEC) of 5.3
mi 11 equivalents per 100 g.

     The difference in uptake by the soils is exactly what would  Ijave
been expected as the high pH associated with the free CaCO- as well as
the higher CEC in the Virtue soil would tend to lower uptake (Williams
and David, 1973, Haghiri, 1974).  These two soils should represent near
maximum and minimum uptake conditions.

     The biological significance to consumer organisms is not clear, but
it does not appear that it can be dismissed as  unimportant.  The  accumu-
lation of 6.3 yg/g Cd in lettuce on a dry weight basis is only about
.315 yg/g on a fresh weight basis at 5.25 percent dry matter (94.75%
water).  However, a relatively small amount of wilting to 90% water
would result in 0.63 yg Cd/g on a fresh weight  basis.  It would appear
that the Cd uptakes found here, particularly on the coarse textured acid
                                   16

-------
TABLE 6.  SUMMARY OF THE SLOPE AND INTERCEPTS OF THE REGRESSION OF
          PLANT Cd CONCENTRATION ON Cd ADDED IN FERTILIZER AND
          PERCENTAGE OF ADDED Cd FOUND IN PLANTS
                 Westport fine sand              Virtue silt loam
Plant          Intercept  Slope Uptake       Intercept  Slope  Uptake
                 yg/g      a/    % b/           yg/g      a/    % b/
Radish



Root
Top

Lettuce
Pea




Seed
Foliage

.36
.43

-.05

.15
.16

23.7
32.5

68.1

10.1
3.7

2.17
3.12
5.29
9.40

1.21
.81
2.02
.31 1.5 (NS) .17
.82 8.38 .44
.61
.84 5.5 .82

— — —



a/  yg Cd/g plant per yg fertilizer Cd/g soil

b/  Percent of Cd in fertilizer found in plant
                                    17

-------
soil, would justify further investigation in regards to uptake of Cd
from fertilizer in soils in which Cd is likely to remain active.   Vir-
tually nothing is known concerning effects from repeated dosage,  and
this aspect should be studied in calcareous as well  as acid soils.

     The effect of treatment on plant nitrogen were  generally small  and
statistical significance could not be demonstrated in most cases.   These
data are not included in the report.

PLACEMENT AND SOURCE EFFECTS

     The results of treatments 7-14 (Table 2) clearly show that fertili-
zer materials and placement affect the Cd uptake, and that this effect
is not the same on the two soils.  The most striking effect is the lack
of Cd uptake from spot placed DAP on the Westport fine sand soil  (Table
7).  Even though approximately the same total amount of Cd was applied
in all treatments in this subset, the Cd uptake is very low wherever DAP
was applied in a spot treatment.  This was generally true whether the Cd
was native in the fertilizer or added to the fertilizer as Cd (hUPO*^-
By contrast the spot placement of CSP on this soil did not generally
reduce Cd uptake as compared to CSP mixed with the soil, nor did the use
of DAP instead of CSP reduce Cd uptake when the fertilizers were mixed
with the soil.  The reason for the marked decrease in Cd uptake due to
the spot placement of DAP on the acid soil is not known, but it is
probably related to the neutral or slightly basic reaction of DAP as
compared to the acid CSP.

     The dramatic decrease due to spot placement of  DAP did not occur on
the Virtue silt loam soil (Table 8), where significant treatment effects
could only be discerned in the lettuce and radish tops.   In both these
cases Cd uptake appeared to be slightly decreased by spot placement of
DAP and increased by spot placement of CSP.  Mixed treatments of both
fertilizers resulted in similar levels in the plant.

     Cadmium uptake in radishes grown on Westport find sand (Table 7),
with added Cd (hLPCh), was slightly higher than that from Cd found in
the fertilizer.  In afl other cases no differences could be detected
between native Cd and Cd added to the fertilizer.  This would indicate
that if this material were used to artifically increase the Cd level of
fertilizers the uptake would probably be at least as great as that from
fertilizers containing a similar amount of native Cd.

     The possibility ,that differences in Cd levels could be due to
different growth effects of the various fertilizers, or simple lack of
uptake due to positional unavailability must be considered.  The treat-
ments did affect plant dry weight and phosphorus levels in a number of
cases.   Summaries of significant effects are shown in Tables 9 and 10.
Data from individual treatments are included in Appendix B, Tables 8-11.
                                    18

-------
TABLE 7.  CADMIUM CONCENTRATIONS IN PLANTS GROWN ON WESTPORT FINE SAND AS AFFECTED BY  FERTILIZER  MATERIAL,
PLACEMENT AND SOURCE OF Cd


Placement

Mix
Spot
Mix
Spot
Mix
Spot
Mix
Spot
Summary of si



Treatment
Material

CSP (high)
CSP (high)
DAP (high)
DAP (high)
CSP (low)
CSP (low)
DAP (low)
DAP (low)
gnificant effects
Mix CSP
Spot CSP
Mix DAP
Spot DAP
Radish
Cd Source

fertilizer
fertilizer
fertilizer
fertilizer
added
added
added
added




Root

2.40
1.92
3.55
.20
3.53
3.20
4.05
.42

2.97
2.56
3.80
.31
Top
yg
3.12
2.88
2.24
4.61
7.33
2.71

3.87
5.10
2.47
<.19
Lettuce
Top
Cd per g dry weight
6.35
4.35
6.01
.28
5.32
5.98
3.61
1.14

5.79
5.17
4.81
.71

Seed

.46
.46
.53
.67
.69
.60

5.66
5.78
5.66
<.19
Pea
Foliage

.91
1.05
1.07
.81
.93
.92

.81
.93
.92
<.19

Cd source effect (P < .05)
In ferti
Added
lizer



2.01
2.80
2.11
3.71






Probability of Type I error for main effect and interaction <.01.

-------
       TABLE 8.  CADMIUM CONCENTRATION

       PLACEMENT AND SOURCE OF Cd
IN PLANTS GROWN ON  VIRTUE  SILT  LOAM  SOIL  AS  AFFECTED  BY  FERTILIZER MATERIAL,
ro
o

Placement

Mix
Spot
Mix
Spot
Mix
Spot
Mix
Spot
Summary of




Treatment
Material

CSP (high)
CSP (high)
DAP (high)
DAP (high)
CSP (low)
CSP (low)
DAP (low)
DAP (low)
significant effects
Mix CSP
Spot CSP
Mix DAP
Spot DAP
Radish
Cd Source

fertilizer
fertilizer
fertilizer
f erti 1 i zer
added
added
added
added





Root

.43
.77
.37
.44
.45
1.12
.47
.57





Top
yg
1.72
2.53
1.46
1.00
1.48
3.22
1.49
1.03

1.60
2.87
1.47
1.02
Lettuce Peas
TOJD Seed Foliage
Cd per g dry weight
1.23
2.41 Below detection
1.25 limit of 0.20
.81
1.07
3.49
1.38
1.08

1.15
2.94
1.31
.94

       Main effects and interaction shown significant probability of Type I error <.01

-------
TABLE 9.  SUMMARY OF MEANS OF MAJOR PLACEMENT AND FERTILIZER MATERIAL EFFECTS ON DRY MATTER YIELDS.

Treatment

Westport fine sand
Mix
Spot
CSP
DAP
Virtue silt loam
Mix
Spot
Radish
Roots Tops
g

3.22
2.62
3.56 3.45
2.24 2.39

4.27 2.09
2.76 1.64
Lettuce Peas
Tops Seed Foliage
dry weight per pot

4.68
1.07 &
a/

5.42 5.91 .,
2.07 5.27 -'

a/ Interaction present, but relatively minor compared to main effect



b/ Complex interaction with fertilizer source.

-------
      TABLE  10.  SUMMARY OF  MEANS  OF  MAJOR  PLACEMENT AND  FERTILIZER MATERIAL EFFECTS ON PLANT PHOSPHORUS CONCENTRATIONS.
ro
Treatment

Westport fine sand
CSP
DAP
Virtue silt loam
CSP
Mix
Spot
DAP
Mix
Spot
Radish
Roots


.58
.70


.35
.30

.39
.19
Tops
percent

.88
1.55


.36
.36

.42
.27
Lettuce
Tops
of dry weight

.51
.60


.48
.44

.48
.38
Peas
Seeds Foliage


.34
.57


.64 .18
.50 .13

.66 .22
.51 .10

-------
     On the Westport soil radishes root and top weights are decreased by
use of DAP fertilizer as compared to CSP, and radish tops and lettuce
were depressed by spot application of either fertilizer.  The reason for
these effects were not completely clear but the DAP did increase plant P
concentrations in most plants (Table 10) independent of placement.  This
indicates that phosphorus from the spot placed DAP was utilized even
though on this soil Cd was not.  While these growth effects do compli-
cate interpretation they simply do not account for the nearly complete
lack of Cd uptake from spot placed DAP.

     The effects of treatment on dry matter yields and phosphorus
concentration was quite different on the calcareous Virtue soil (Table 9
and 10).  Here yields were consistently depressed by spot placement of
fertilizer.  This is probably due to lower availability of phosphorus
as phosphorus concentrations were depressed by spot placement on this
soil, particularly in the case of the DAP.

     These effects of placement and fertilizer material on yield and
plant phosphorus concentration may be of agronomic interest but we are
concerned with them here in relation to interpretation of the Cd uptake
data.  It should not be implied that these effects are related to the Cd in t
fertilizer.  They are useful in evaluating whether the plant was utilizing
the nutrients supplied by a particular material and placement.

     The most important effect noted in this section of the experiment
was the lack of Cd uptake from spot placement of DAP on the acid soil.
This effect may have important implications as a management technique,
and therefore should be further investigated from both theoretical and
application standpoints.  Effects of material and placement on Cd uptake
on the calcareous soil were less dramatic but may still warrant further
investigation.
                                   23

-------
                              SECTION VI

                              REFERENCES

Anonymous.  1974.  Development document for effluent limitations guide-
     lines and new source standards for the basic fertilizer chemicals.
     EPA-440/1-74-011-9.   United States Environmental  Protection Agency,
     Washington, DC.

Haghiri, F.  1974.  Plant uptake of cadmium as influenced by cation
     exchange capacity, organic matter, zinc, and soil  temperature.  J.
     Environ. Quality 3:180-183.

Haghiri, F.  1973.  Cadmium uptake by plants.  J. Environ.  Quality.
     2:93-95.

Schroeder, H. A., and J.  J. Balassa.   1963.   Cadmium:   Uptake by vege-
     tables from superphosphate in soil.  Science 140:819-820.

Parker Rust Proof Co. British Patent  270820 (1926).

Williams, C. H., and D. J.  David.   1973.  The effect of superphosphate
     on the cadmium content of soils  and plants.   Aust.  J.  Soil  Res.
     11:43-56.
                                  24

-------
                             SECTION VII

                             APPENDIX A

Synthesis of Cadmium Dihydrogen Phosphate
(Preparation of Cd (H2P04)2.2H20.)

     We were unable to obtain this salt through normal  commercial
channels so the compound was synthesized in the following manner
using the Parker Rust Proof Company Patented procedure  (1926).

     The salt was synthesized in the following manner:   approximately
1 gram of 100 mesh cadmium metal was allowed to react with 20 ml of 75%
phosphoric acid held at 80-85 C.  Two more 10 ml portions of 75% phospho-
ric acid were added at intervals of several hours.   When all of the
cadmium metal was consumed (visual examination), the reaction mixture
was allowed to cool.  The white crystals which formed were separated
from the mother liquor by filtration.  They were washed with absolute
ethanol to remove any unreacted phosphoric acid and allowed to air dry
for several hours.  The crystals were then analyzed via atomic absorption
and found to contain 39% cadmium.  The predicted value  for cadmium in
this compound is 33%.  The 6% difference might well be  due to a small
amount of unreacted cadmium metal remaining with the crystals.
                                  25

-------
                              APPENDIX B
                          LIST OF DATA TABLES
B-l.       Cadmium and Zinc concentrations in fertilizer material used in
          Cd uptake experiment (mean of 4 replications).

B-2.       Dry matter yields from Westport fine sand soil in pots treated
          with MCP or CSP fertilizers from two sources.  Rates calculated
          to supply 100 yg P/g soil.

B-3.       Dry matter yields from Virtue silt loam soil  in pots treated
          with MCP or CSP fertilizer from two sources (mean of 2 replica-
          tions).  Rates calculated to supply 100 yg P/g soil.

B-4.       Phosphorus concentration in plants grown on Virtue silt loam
          soil with MCP or CSP fertilizer from two sources (mean of 2
          replications).  Rates calculated to supply 100 yg P/g soil.

B-5.       Phosphorus concentration in plants grown on Westport fine sand
          soil treated with MCP or CSP fertilizer from two sources (mean
          of 2 replications).  Rates calculated to supply 100 yg P/g
          soil.

B-6.       Cadmium concentration in plants grown on Wesport fine sand as
          affected by Cd in phosphate fertilizer (mean of 2 replica-
          tions).  Low and high sources of CSP contain 12 and 174 ppm yg
          Cd/g respectively.

B-7.       Cadmium concentration in plants grown on Virtue silt loam soil
          as affected by Cd in phosphate fertilizer (mean of 2 replica-
          tions).  Low and high sources of CSP contain 12 and 174 yg
          Cd/g respectively.

B-8.       Dry matter yields of plants grown on Westport fine sand as
          affected by fertilizer materials and placement (mean of 2
          replications).

B-9.       Mean dry matter yield of plants grown on Virtue silt loam as
          affected by fertilizer material and placement (mean of 2
          replications).

B-10.     Mean phosphorus concentration in plants grown on Westport fine
          sand as affected by fertilizer material and placement (mean of
          2 replications).

B-ll.     Mean phosphorus concentration of plants grown on Virtue silt
          loam as affected by fertilizer material and placement (mean of
          2 replications).
                                  26

-------
TABLE B-l.  CADMIUM AND ZINC CONCENTRATIONS IN FERTILIZER MATERIAL USED
            IN Cd UPTAKE EXPERIMENT (MEAN OF 4 REPLICATIONS).
                                        Cd_        In.

          Material                    yg/g        yg/g

          CSP - low Cd                  12        78

          CSP - high Cd                174      1564

          DAP - low Cd                  7.0      114

          DAP - high Cd                157      1385
                                   27

-------
       ™0SnilRr^ ?L!lAnFE?  JJm J™™  ?ESTPORT FINE SAND SOIL IN POTS TREATED WITH MCP OR CSP FERTILIZERS FROM
       TWO  SOURCES (MEAN  OF  2  REPLICATIONS).   RATES CALCULATED TO SUPPLY 100 yg P/g SOIL.
ro
CO
CSP
Source
low-High
%
100-0 (MCP)
100-0
80-20
60-40
40-60
20-80
100-0
Standard Error
Mean
Percent dry matter
Final Cd
Concentration
Fertilizer (Soil)
yg/g
0 (O)^-7
13 (0.0065)
45 (.023)
77 (.039)
110 (0.055)
142 (0.071)
174 (.087)



Radish
Root

3.90
3.08
3.61
3.66
3.64
3.45
4.33
.421
3.67
5.27

Top
g/pot
3.84
3.99
3.52
3.78
3.90
3.94
3.93
.363
3.84
5.63
Lettuce
Top
6.00
5.81
5.60
5.38
4.54
5.82
5.50
.351
5.52
5.25

Seed

5.45
4.44
4.52
5.55
4.98
4.08
4.60
.584
4.80
26.6
Peas
Foliage

8.74
9.48
7.65
7.91
8.83
9.85
8.93
1.20
8.77
21.9

       -7 < 4 x TO"4 yg/g.

-------
ro
       TABLE B-3.  DRY MATTER YIELDS FROM VIRTUE SILT LOAM SOIL IN POTS TREATED WITH MCP OR CSP FERTILIZER FROM TWO
       SOURCES (MEAN OF 2 REPLICATIONS).  RATES CALCULATED TO SUPPLY 100 yg P/g SOIL.

CSP Final Cd
Source Concentration
low-High Fertilizer (Soil)
%
100-0 (MCP)
100-0
80-20
60-40
40-60
20-80
100-0
Standard Error
Mean
Percent dry matter
yg/g
0 (O)^-7
13 (.0065)
45 (.023)
77 (.039)
110 (.055)
142 (.071)
174 (.087)



Radish
/Root

3.71
4.35
4.74
4.10
4.67
4.96
4.87
.412
4.49
5.88
Top
g/pot
1.93
2.05
1.98
2.19
2.23
2.16
2.21
.177
2.11
7.15
Lettuce
Top
5.58
5.55
7.05
5.61
7.10
5.94
5.08
.712
5.99
4.82
Peas
Seed

6.54
5.31
6.03
5.42
7.18
7.49
6.84
.457
6.41
31.5
Foliage

5.50
5.67
5.63
6.85
6.21
5.37
5.43
.692
5.81
48.1

       a/  < 4 x 10"4 yg/g

-------
CO
o
      TABLE  B-4.   PHOSPHORUS  CONCENTRATION  IN  PLANTS  GROWN ON VIRTUE SILT LOAM SOIL WITH MCP OR CSP FERTILIZER FROM

      TWO  SOURCES  (MEAN  OF  2  REPLICATIONS).  RATES  CALCULATED TO SUPPLY TOO yg P/g SOIL.
CSP
Source
low-High
%
100-0 (MCP)
100-0
80-20
60-40
40-60
20-80
100-0
Standard Error
Mean

Final Cd
Concentration
Fertilizer (Soil)
yg/g
0 (O)^
13 (.0065)
45 (.023)
77 (.039)
110 (.055)
142 (.071)
174 (.087)



Radish
Root

.36
.34
.32
.38
.36
.33
.35
.025
.349


Top
% P
.43
.41
.35
.35
.36
.35
.39
.014
.374
*
Lettuce
Top
.60
.51
.46
.48
.45
.47
.49
.047
.492


Seed

.64
.59
.62
.60
.64
.64
.65
.021
.619

Peas
Foliage

.20
.29
.21
.24
.15
.15
.14
.0199
.193
**

      *Signifleant at  .05 level
      **Signifleant at  .01 level


      a/  < 4 x 10"4 yg/g

-------
CO
        TABLE  B-5.   PHOSPHORUS CONCENTRATION  IN PLANTS  GROWN  ON  WESTPORT  FINE  SAND  SOIL  TREATED  WITH  MCP  OR  CSP
        FERTILIZER  FROM TWO SOURCES (MEAN  OF  2  REPLICATIONS).  RATES  CALCULATED  TO  SUPPLY  100  yg P/g  SOIL.

CSP
Source
low-High
%
100-0 (MCP)
100-0
80-20
60-40
40-60
20-80
100-0
Standard Error
Mean
Final Cd
Concentration
Fertilizer (Soil)
yg/g
0 (O)^7
13 (.0065)
45 (.023)
77 (.039)
110 (.055)
142 (.071)
174 (.087)



Radish
Root

.75
.70
.65
.64
.66
.62
.59
.031
.656


Top
% P
1.04
1.08
1.04
1.04
1.06
.91
.93
.023
1.10

Lettuce
Top

.45
.45
.44
.47
.47
.47
.50
.025
.462


Seed

.69
.66
.67
.73
.66
.69
.70
.046
.682

Peas
Foliage

.35
.36
.35
.31
.39
.38
.35
.042
.352

        a/   < 4 x 10~4 ug/g

-------
         TABLE B-6.   CADMIUM CONCENTRATION IN PLANTS GROWN ON WESTPORT  FINE  SAND  AS AFFECTED  BY  Cd  IN  PHOSPHATE
         FERTILIZER (MEAN OF 2 REPLICATIONS).  LOW AND HIGH SOURCES  OF  CSP CONTAIN 12 AND  174 ppm yg Cd/g  RESPECTIVELY.
CO
ro

CSP
Source
low-High
%
100-0 (MCP)
100-0
80-20
60-40
40-60
20-80
100-0
Standard Error (1
Linear regression
Slope
Intercept
S.E. yx
r2
Final Cd
Concentration
Fertilizer (Soil)
ug/g
0 (O)-/
13 (.0065)
45 (.023)
77 (.039)
110 (.055)
142 (.071)
174 (.087)
og normal distribution)
(soil Cd vs plant Cd)



Radish
Root

.50
.37
.90
1.21
1.64
2.10
2.41
.157

23.7
.356
.0987
.986**

Top
yg Cd/g
.38
.47
1.18
2.11
2.12
2.76
3.12
.133

32.5
.433
.218
.966**
Lettuce
Top
dry wt.
.20
.44
1.34
2.20
4.08
4.18
6.33
.088

68.1
-0.49
.438
.969**
Peas
Seed

09
<.19
.33
.55
.81
.95
.91
.082

10.1
.149
.094
.929**

Foliage

<* 1 Q
^ "I Q
<^ 1 Q
.35
.42
.40
.46
.079

3.7
.163
.056
.789*

        a/   <  4  x  10"4  yg/g


        **  significant  at .01  level
*sig.  at  .05  level

-------
        TABLE  B-7.   CADMIUM  CONCENTRATION  IN PLANTS GROWN ON VIRTUE SILT LOAM SOIL AS AFFECTED BY Cd IN PHOSPHATE
        FERTILIZER  (MEAN OF  2  REPLICATIONS).  LOW AND HIGH SOURCES OF CSP CONTAIN 12 AND 174 yg Cd/g RESPECTIVELY.
CO
CO

CSP
Source
low-High
%
100-0 (MCP)
100-0
80-20
60-40
40-60
20-80
100-0
Standard Error
Linear regression
Slope
Intercept
S.E. y.x
r2
Final Cd.
Concentration
Fertilizer (Soil)
yg/g
0 (O)^-7
13 (.0065)
45 (.023)
77 (.039)
110 (.055)
142 (.071)
174 (.087)

(soil Cd vs plant Cd)




Radish
Root

.33
.28
.28
.44
.43
.36
.43
.036

1.48
.305
.056
.472
Top
ug
.78
.87
.98
1.21
1.31
1.48
1.45
.093

8.38
.819
.066
.954*
Lettuce Peas
Top Seed Foliage
Cd/g dry wt.
.85
.79 Below detection limit
.92 of 0.20
1.23
1.08
1.28
1.24
.091

5.50
.836
.103
.784*

         a/   <  4  x  10"4 yg/g

         *    Sig. at  .01  level.

-------
       TABLE B-8.   DRY MATTER YIELDS OF PLANTS GROWN ON WESTPORT FINE SAND AS  AFFECTED  BY  FERTILIZER MATERIALS

       AND PLACEMENT (MEAN OF 2 REPLICATIONS).
CO
-p"
Treatment
Placement

Mix
Spot
Mix
Spot
Mix
Spot
Mix
Spot
Material

CSP (high)
CSP (high)
DAP (high)
DAP (high)
CSP (low)
CSP (low)
DAP (low)
DAP (low)
Cd Source

fertilizer
fertilizer
fertilizer
fertilizer
added
added
added
added
Radish
Root

4.33
2.99
1.61
2.59
3.72
3.22
2.20
2.55
TOJD

3.92
2.65
2.20
2.18
3.87
3.37
2.90
2.30
Lettuce
Top

5.49
.38
5.07
1.36
3.71
1.19
4.48
1.34
Peas
Seed

4.59
5.21
3.50
2.65
3.73
4.35
3.82
1.97
Foliage

3.93
7.19
3.92
3.77
3.66
5.58
3.90
1.94
Summary of significant effects
Placement

Material


Mix
Spot
CSP
DAP








3.56
2.24

3.22
2.62
3.45
2.39
a/
4.68
1.07
b/




4.47
2.99
c/






       Probability  of Type  I  error <.01  except as  noted.


       a/   Small  placement  X  material  interaction


       b/   Complex  interaction,  but much smaller than placement effect


       c/   P  <.07

-------
co
en
       TABLE  B-9.   MEAN  DRY  MATTER YIELD OF  PLANTS  GROWN  ON  VIRTUE  SILT  LOAM  AS  AFFECTED  BY  FERTILIZER MATERIAL  AND

       PLACEMENT  (MEAN OF  2  REPLICATIONS).

Treatment
Placement Material

Mix
Spot
Mix
Spot
Mix
Spot
Mix
Spot
Summary




CSP
CSP
DAP
DAP
CSP
CSP
DAP
DAP

(high)
(high)
(high)
(high)
(low)
(low)
(low)
(low)
Cd Source

fertilizer
fertilizer
fertilizer
fertilizer
added
added
added
added
Radish
Root

4.87
3.14
4.12
2.69
3.70
2.70
4.44
2.53
Top
g/pot
2.
1.
1.
1.
2.
1.
2.
1.
12
72
86
60
00
56
28
67
Lettuce
Top
5.
2.
6.
1.
5.
2.
5.
2.
08
04
27
36
24
01
11
87
Peas
Seed

5.
7.
6.
1.
5.
4.
5.
3.

43
12
27
36
17
65
30
95
Foliage

6.84
4.84
4.08
6.24
5.58
4.94
7.14
5.13
of significant effects






Mix
Spot

4.27
2.76

2.
1.

09
64

5.
2.

42
07







5.91
5.27
a/

       Probability of Type I error <.01  except as  noted.


       a/   Main effect probability complicated by  interaction.   Spot  placement  lower  than mix  except  for  the

            low Cd DAP.

-------
GJ
O1
       TABLE  B-10.   MEAN PHOSPHORUS CONCENTRATION IN PLANTS GROWN  ON  WESTPORT  FINE  SAND AS AFFECTED  BY  FERTILIZER
       MATERIAL  AND PLACEMENT (MEAN OF 2 REPLICATIONS).

Treatment
Placement Material

Mix
Spot
Mix
Spot
Mix
Spot
Mix
Spot
Summary



CSP
CSP
DAP
DAP
CSP
CSP
DAP
DAP

(high)
(high)
(high)
(high)
(low)
(low)
(low)
(low)
Cd Source

fertilizer
fertilizer
fertilizer
fertilizer
added
added
added
added
Radish
Root

.58
.49
.71
.72
.66
.57
.72
.73



1
1
1

1
1
Top
% P
.93
.73
.46
.66
.04
.82
.56
.41
Lettuce
Top
.50
.45
.68
.55
.56
.53
.60
.56
Peas
Seed

.70
.70
.61
.63
.60
.62
.65
.61
Foliage

.35
.36
.47
.74
.27
.35
.56
.49
of significant effects




CSP
DAP
.58
.70

1
.88
.55
.51
.60
a

.34
.57

       Probability  of  Type  I  error  of  main  effects  shown  <.01.

       a/  Main  effect not  significant;  interaction with  source  <.05.

-------
      TABLE B-ll.  MEAN PHOSPHORUS CONCENTRATIONS OF PLANTS GROWN ON VIRTUE SILT LOAM AS AFFECTED BY FERTILIZER
      MATERIAL AND PLACEMENT  (MEAN OF 2 REPLICATIONS).
OJ
--4


Placement

Mix
Spot
Mix
Spot
Mix
Spot
Mix
Spot
Summary of





Treatment
Material

CSP (high)
CSP (high)
DAP (high)
DAP (high)
CSP (low)
CSP (low)
DAP (low)
DAP (low)
significant effects





Radish
Cd Source

fertilizer
fertilizer
fertilizer
fertilizer
added
added
added
added

Mix CSP
Spot CSP
Mix DAP
Spot DAP

Root

.35
.28
.39
.17
.35
.32
.38
.21

.35
.30
.39
.19

Top
% P
.37
.29
.36
.28
.36
.42
.48
.26

.36
.36
.42
.27

Lettuce
Top
.48
.42
.47
.38
.47
.46
.48
.38

.48
.44
.48
.38
a/
Peas
Seed

.65
.49
.66
.51
.63
.52
.65
.51

.64
.50
.66
.51
b/
Foliage

.14
.15
.28
.08
.22
.11
.17
.17

.18
.13
.22
.10
a/

       Probability  of  Type  I  error.

       <.01  for  placement,  <.05  for  material  and  interaction except as noted.

       a/  Additional  interaction with  sources.

       b/  Only  placement effect significant.

-------
                                    TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
 1. REPORT NO.
    EPA-600/3-76-053
                              2.
                                                            3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION-NO.
 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
  Plant  Uptake of Cadmium from Phosphate Fertilizer
             5. REPORT DATE
                  May  19.76
                                                            6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
 7. AUTHOR(S)
  John  Reuss, H. L. Dooley,  and William Griffis
                                                            8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
  U.  S.  Environmental Protection Agency
  Corvallis Environmental  Research Laboratory,  EERD.TEB
  Corvallis, Oregon  97330
              10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.

                 1AA602
              11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
   U.  S.  Environmental Protection Agency
   Corvallis Environmental  Research Laboratory
   Corvallis, Oregon  97330
              13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
               Final--FY1970-1976
              14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
                                                                EPA/ORD
 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
 16. ABSTRACT
               A preliminary investigation of  selected crop plants  for Cadmium
          uptake from  various sources of commercially available  fertilizer was
          conducted under  controlled greenhouse  conditions in Corvallis, Oregon.
          Results indicated  statistically significant differences  in  Cadmium
          content of plant tissue as functions of fertilizer source,  mode of
          application,  tissues analyzed, and soil  type.  The highest  level of
          Cadmium accumulation (6 yg/g dry weight)  was found in  lettuce grown
          on a course  textured acid soil and fertilized at the rate of 100 yg P/g
          soil with concentrated super phosphate (CSP) containing  174 y Cd/g
          fertilizer (0.087  y Cd/g soil).  It  was  concluded that these uptakes may
          be of sufficent  magnitude to be of biological significance  to consumer
          organisms.   Further study was recommended.
                                KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
                                              b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS  C.  COSATI Field/Group
                                                 Cadmium, bioaccumulatior
                                               and  phosphate fertilizer
 i. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
                                               19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)'
                                                  UNCLASSIFIED
            RELEASE TO  PUBLIC
20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)

   UNCLASSIFIED
                           21. NO. OF PAGES

                                 43
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
                                             38
                           it U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: I976—697-I8I (88 REGION 10

-------