United States
           Environmental Protection
           Agency
           Environmental Research
           Laboratory
           Corvallis OR 97330
  3-
EPA-600(78-088
September 1978
           Research and Development
xvEPA
NUTRIENT CHEMISTRY
OF A LARGE, DEEP LAKE
IN SUBARCTIC ALASKA

-------
                               REPORTING SERIES

Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, have been grouped into nine series. These nine broad cate-
gories were established to facilitate further development and application of en-
vironmental technology.  Elimination  of traditional  grouping was consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields.
The nine series are:

      1    Environmental  Health Effects Research
      2    Environmental  Protection Technology
      3    Ecological  Research
      4    Environmental  Monitoring
      5,   Socioeconomic Environmental Studies
      6    Scientific and Technical Assessment Reports (STAR)
      7    Interagency Energy-Environment Research and Development
      8    "Special" Reports
      9    Miscellaneous Reports

This report has been assigned to the ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH series This series
describes research on the effects of pollution on  humans, plant and animal spe-
cies, and  materials. Problems are assessed for their long- and  short-term influ-
ences. Investigations  include formation, transport, and pathway studies to deter-
mine the fate of pollutants and their effects. This work provides the technical basis
for setting standards to minimize undesirable changes in living organisms in the
aquatic, terrestrial, and atmospheric environments.
This ciocumenL is available io the public through the National Technical Informa-
tion Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161

-------
                                          EPA-600/3-78-088
                                          September 1978
         NUTRIENT CHEMISTRY OF A LARGE,
          DEEP LAKE IN SUBARCTIC ALASKA
J. D. LaPerriere, T. Tilsworth, and L. A. Casper
          Institute of Water Resources
              University of Alaska
             Fairbanks, Alaska 99701
                     R800276
                 Project Officer

               Eldor W. Schallock
  Assessment and Criteria Development Division
   Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
             Corvallis, Oregon 97330
   CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
       OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
      U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
             CORVALLIS, OREGON 97330

-------
                                 DISCLAIMER
     This report has been reviewed by the Arctic Environmental Research
Station, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved for publication.
Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views
and policies of the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, nor does mention
of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation
for use.

-------
                                  ABSTRACT

     The primary objective of this project was to assess the state of the
water quality of Harding Lake, and to attempt to predict the effects of
future development within its watershed.  Since the major effect of degrada-
tion of water quality due to human activity is the promotion of nuisance
growths of plants, the major emphasis was placed on measurements of plant
growth and concentrations of the major nutrients they require.   Planktonic
algal growth was found to be low, below 95.6 gm/m2/year, and the growth of
submerged rooted plants was found to be relatively less important at approxi-
                2
mately 1.35 gm/m /year.  Measurements of the growth of attached algae were
not conducted, therefore the relative importance of their growth is currently
unknown.
     A model for predicting the effect of future real estate development in
the watershed was modified and applied to this lake.   This model adequately
describes current water quality conditions, and is assumed to have some
predictive ability, but several cautions concerning application of this
model to Harding Lake are discussed.
     A secondary objective was to study the thermal regime of a deep sub-
arctic lake.  Intensive water temperature measurements were made throughout
one year and less intensive measurements were conducted during  two additional
years.  The possibility that this lake may occasionally stratify thermally
under the ice and not mix completely in the spring was discovered.  The
implications of this possibility are discussed for management of subarctic
lakes.  Hydrologic and energy budgets of this lake are attempted; the annual
                                     4           32
heat budget is estimated at 1.96 x 10  ± 1.7 x 10  cal/cm .
     The results of a study of domestic water supply and waste  disposal
alternatives in the watershed, and the potential for enteric bacterial con-
tamination of the lake water are presented.  Limited work on the zooplankton,
fishes, and benthic macroinvertebrates of this lake is also presented.
                                     iii

-------
                                  CONTENTS


Abstract	iii

Figures	vi

Tables	vii

Acknowledgements 	  x

  1.  Introduction  	  1

  2.  Conclusions	4

  3.  Recommendations	6

  4.  Description of Study Area	8

  5.  Materials and Methods	15
        General	15
        Climatology	15
        Physical Limnology 	 16
          Depth, Temperature, Electroconductivity, pH, Dissolved Oxygen. 16
          Light Penetration	17
        Chemical Limnology 	 18
          Sampling	18
          Ammonia	18
          Organic Nitrogen and Ammonia	„	19
          Nitrite/Nitrate	19
          Phosphorus	20
          Inorganic Carbon 	 21
          Total Organic Carbon	21
        Biological  Limnology  	 21
          Algae	 21
          Vascular  Aquatic Plants	24
          Zooplankton.	24
          Benthic Macroinvertebrates  .  	 25
          Enteric Bacteria 	 25

  6.  Results and Discussion	27
        Climatology	27
          Heat  Budget	27
          Hydrology.	28
        Physical Limnology 	 29
          Thermal Regime  	 29
          Dissolved Oxygen .....  	  .....  	 34
          Light Penetration	38

-------
                            CONTENTS (continued)


        Chemical  Limnology	38
          Ionic Composition 	  .....  38
          Hydrogen Ion Concentration	46
          Nutrient Chemistry	46
        Biological Limnology	57
          Algae	57
          Vascular Aquatic Plants 	  83
          Zooplankton	88
          Fishes	89
          Benthic Macroinvertebrates	90
          Enteric Bacteria	90

References	109

Appendix	115

-------
                                    FIGURES


Number                                                                Page

  1    Morphometric map of Harding Lake (after Blackwell,
      1965) with sampling stations indicated 	   9

  2    Hypsometric curve for Harding Lake (after
      Blackwell, 1965) 	  10

  3    Watershed map for Harding Lake	12

  4    Isotherms—Harding Lake, with ice thickness indicated	30

  5    Temperatures observed under ice at Harding Lake,
      May 1975	32

  6    Temperature profiles for selected dates.   Spring 1975,
      Harding Lake	33

  7    Isopleths of electrical conductivity.
      Harding Lake	35

  8    Isopleths of dissolved oxygen.  Harding Lake 	  36

  9    Isopleths of percent saturation of dissolved
      oxygen.  Harding Lake	37

 10    Light penetration.   Harding Lake 	  39

 11    Isopleths of hydrogen ion concentration as the negative
      logarithm, pH.   Harding Lake	47

 12    Isobaths--nitrate and nitrite nitrogen.
      Harding Lake	49

 13    Isopleths of nitrate and nitrite concentration.
      Harding Lake	50

 14    Total phosphorus isopleths.  Harding Lake	56

 15    Algal count.  September 28, 1974.   Harding Lake	61

-------
                             FIGURES (continued)


Number                                                                Page

 16   Algal pigment concentration, Harding Lake. ... 	  63

 17   Algal primary production.  Station Deep I,
      Harding Lake, Alaska.  Ice thickness and Secchi
      depth indicated	66

 18   Algal primary production, Harding Lake ....  	  68

 19   Annual algal primary production.   Harding Lake  . .  	  71

 20   Diurnal primary productivity.  Harding Lake.
      Deep Station I.  June 25-26, 1975	76

 21   Diurnal primary productivity.  Harding Lake.
      Deep Station I.  September 12-13, 1975	77

 22   Heterotrophic production.  Harding Lake.   November 14, 1975.  .  .  80

 23   Plant distribution map.  Harding Lake, 1975	  .  85

 24   Dry weight of zooplankton captures.  Harding Lake	87

 25   Morphometric map of  Harding Lake with sampling
      stations for benthos and bacteriological  sampling
      indicated	103
                                     vn

-------
                                   TABLES


Number                                                                   Page

  1    Heat Budget Estimates, Harding Lake--1973-1975	27

  2    Water Quality and Cation and Anion Balance,
      Harding Lake—June 3, 1975	40

  3    Limnological Properties, Harding Lake--1966 	 41

  4    Chemistry of Snow, Ice, and Water, Harding Lake—April 30, 1966 .  . 43

  5    Cation Composition of World Rivers vs. Harding Lake 	 45

  6    Organic and Ammonia Nitrogen, Harding Lake--1975,
      Deep Station I	51

  7    Organic and Ammonia Nitrogen, Harding Lake--1975,
      Shallow Stations	53

  8    Nutrient Values for Selected Oligotrophic Lakes 	 57

  9    Plankton Counts, Harding Lake—September 28, 1974,
      Deep Station 1	58

 10    Algae Identified from Harding Lake	62

 11    Integral Values of Algal Growth Parameters and Incident
      Radiation, Harding Lake, Deep Station I 	 70

 12    Annual Algal Primary Production, High-Latitude Lakes	73

 13   Rodhe's Index:  Selected Oligotrophic Lakes 	 74

 14   Time-of-Day Effects on Carbon-14 Experiments, Harding Lake	78

 15   Predicted Total Phosphorus and Resultant Chlorophyll a
      Concentrations and Secchi Depths for Selected Development
      Possibilities at Harding Lake	82

 16   Submersed Hydrophyte Species, Harding Lake--1974	84
                                    vm

-------
                             TABLES (continued)


Number                                                                   Page

 17   Plant Biomass Estimates for Samples Representing 100%
      Cover of a Single Species, Harding Lake—1974	86

 18   Zooplankton Counts, Harding Lake—August 5, 1974	88

 19   Zooplankton Identified from Harding Lake	89

 20   Fish Stocking History, Harding Lake ..... 	  91

 21   Netting Records, Harding Lake .	.92

 22   Benthic Macroinvertebrates, Profundal  and Sublittoral
      Stations, Harding Lake—July 24, 1973	95

 23   Benthic Macroinvertebrates, Littoral Stations, Harding Lake--
      August 17, 1973	98

 24   Chironomids Reared from Harding Lake—1974	102

 25   Statistical Summary of Fecal Coliform Results, Harding Lake—
      1973	105

 26   Statistical Summary of Total Coliform Results, Harding Lake--
      1973	106
                                      IX

-------
                              ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

     The many local,  state,  and federal  agencies  that participated in this
project both directly and indirectly include the  following:   Fairbanks North
Star Borough; Alaska  Department of Fish  and Game;  and Alaska Department of
Natural Resources, Division  of Parks;  Alaska Department of Health and Social
Services, Environmental  Health Division;  Alaska State Troopers; the Girl
Scouts of America; the United States Army,  Fort Wainwright;  and the U. S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Arctic  Environmental Research Laboratory.
     Many individuals assisted with these research studies.   A special
acknowledgement is directed  to Dr. David Nyquist  who was instrumental in  the
early development of the project proposal.   The late congressman Nick Begich
is acknowledged for his assistance in achieving funding, and a note of thanks
is extended to U. S.  Senator Mike Gravel  for his  interest in the project.
     Field and laboratory assistance as  well as administrative and clerical
help was provided by Institute of Water  Resources personnel, especially
Martha Kandelin, Donald Woodruff, Larry  Dietrich, Thomas Weingartner, Wolfgang
Hebel, Paul Larson, Lucy McCarthy, and Timothy  Cordis.
     Technical assistance with fish surveys was provided by  the Alaska Depart-
ment of Fish and Game.  The  Environmental Health  Division, Alaska Department
of Health and Social  Services, was very  helpful in conducting the sanitary
survey for the lake and its  developed area.  Additionally, laboratory per-
sonnel of the Environmental  Health Division gave  valuable assistance in the
coliform analyses.  The work on the vascular hydrophytes was conducted by
Frederick Payne of Michigan  State University with funding assistance from the
Foundation for Environmental Education.   Mounting of the dissected chironomid
adults and associated ecdyses was conducted by  Margaret P. McLean of the
Freshwater Institute of Environment Canada and  these were identified by Dr.
Ole A. Saether of that institute.  Assistance with the application of current

-------
water quality models to Harding Lake was provided by Dr. Roger W. Bachmann
and Daniel E. Can-field, Jr. of Iowa State University.
     Several units of the University of Alaska deserve special mention,
including the Institute of Marine Science,  Institute of Arctic Biology,
Virology-Rabies Unit of the State of Alaska Department of Health and Social
Services, and the Forest Soils Laboratory.
     Others who deserve special mention for the roles they played in comple-
tion of this project include the Hollinrake family, Tryphena Taylor, and the
many other residents surrounding Harding Lake who graciously provided help
when needed.
     Environmental Protection Agency personnel were very helpful and patient;
especially noted are the services of Ernst  Mueller, the original project
officer, and Eldor Schallock, the project officer, for his sincere interest
and assistance with the project.

-------
                                  SECTION 1
                                INTRODUCTION

     Harding Lake is centrally located in Interior Alaska at 64°25'  N,
146°50' W, adjacent to the Tanana River and abutting the Tanana-Yukon uplands.
Fairbanks, the second largest urban area in the state with a population of
approximately 65,000, is 73 km to the northwest and access to the lake is
afforded by one of the primary highways of the state.  Paralleling the high-
way in this area and passing within a few kilometers to the north of the lake
is the Trans-Alaska Pipeline and its right-of-way.  This lake is the closest
lake to Fairbanks having sufficient size (988 hectares) and depth (43 m
maximum, 16 m mean) for recreation in the Tanana Valley.
     Lakeside development began very early in the history of the region when
the present highway was a trail.  The relatively early importance of the lake
in the Fairbanks area is indicated by the renaming of the lake in 1923 for
President Warren G. Harding.  The aboriginal name for the lake had been
Salchaket Lake.  Building of first-tier lakeside dwellings has been intense
with occupancy of private lots on nearly 75% of the lakeshore (Larson,
1974).  Development is now proceeding in second-tier lots in many sections.
     This development has created concern for the water quality of the lake.
In 1966, Alaska State Division of Public Health scientists discovered possible
coliform bacteria contamination of the lake.  Ecologists (Weeden, 1971;
Nyquist, 1971), noting the density of near-shore development and aware of the
bacterial contamination of the lake, became concerned that the lake might
lose its recreational potential.  Lakeshore residents also expressed concern
over deterioration of the aesthetic qualities of the lake and its environs,
with some reports of "blooms" of floating algae and many complaints about
waste disposal practices.  These signs all pointed to cultural (accelerated)
eutrophication of the lake from nonpoint discharges suspected to be emanating
from septic infiltration and surface run-off along the developed shoreline.
                                      1

-------
     Although there had been infrequent, short-term studies  of the lake by
various investigators, especially students of the University of Alaska at
Fairbanks, there were no comprehensive data on the nutrient  status and
trophic state of the lake.  Attendant to the specific problem of assessing
cultural eutrophication of the lake, there was the general  need to develop
fundamental limnological knowledge about the physical, chemical, and biolog-
ical regimes of deep subarctic lakes.  Recent studies of a deep lake in the
Canadian arctic have been reported (Schindler et al.3 1974;  Welch and Kalff,
1974; Rigler et al.3 1974), but with few exceptions  (Hobbie, 1964), there is
not even rudimentary data on most deep lakes in the Alaskan arctic and
subarctic and references have been made to the scarcity of information on
arctic lakes (Livingstone, 1963; Hobbie, 1973).  The extensive efforts of
the Tundra Biome Program were largely confined to tundra ponds and only
recently, in post-Biome studies, have large lakes come into the forefront of
this effort.
     This fundamental knowledge is particularly important with regard to the
thermal mechanics of such lakes.  The extreme annual temperature variation
in areas such as the Alaskan intermontaine plateau produces  thick ice cover
over a large part of the year in a cycle broken by nearly temperate summer
conditions.  An equally eccentric light regime in concert with this seasonal
temperature cycle may produce unusual hydromechanical situations at times of
seasonal changeover.  Thus, a study of the thermal regime of Harding Lake
was seen to be a significant contribution to knowledge of large arctic and
subarctic lakes.
     The limited scale of Phase I work provided an important conclusion,
namely, that concentration values of nearly all plant nutrient parameters
studied were near the detection limits of standard methods.   This necessi-
tated selecting more sensitive methods or looking to collective parameters
to obtain information on the nutrient status of the  lake.  It also became
apparent that the low levels of plant nutrients in the water column probably
meant that the nutrient status of the sediments and  the rooted vascular macro-
phytes were important parameters to be considered.

-------
     The establishment of a permanent field station at the onset of Phase II
marked the beginning of intensive biological studies, especially measurement
of algal production and ancillary work on vascular hydrophyte populations.
Studies of the higher trophic levels were begun or advanced, with some
attention given to zooplankton dynamics, benthic macroinvertebrates, and
certain aspects of the fish community of the lake.
     During Phase III, completion of the chemical nutrient work focused on
potential loading of the lake system from its watershed.  A theoretical
approach to questions of cultural eutrophication has often concerned measure-
ments of the macronutrients necessary for algal growth and the algal response
to their presence.  More recently Vollenweider (1971) and others have devel-
oped sophisticated models to predict the effects of specific nutrient loading
of lakes de-emphasizing the role of plant nutrients dissolved in the lake
water in favor of emphasizing the role of their potential supply by the
contributing watershed.  Ancillary to the focus on the role of the watershed,
a limited amount of work was addressed to the phenomenon of the dropping
water level which was of great concern to the lakeshore land owners.  More
detailed studies of the vernal thermal characteristics of this lake were also
carried out during this phase.  An ancillary study which concerned benthic
invertebrates as trophic indicators in Alaska was also completed during this
phase and that study treated information concerning this lake (LaPerriere,
1975).
     When our analyses showed an apparent under-ice dormancy of the phyto-
plankton, as indicated by very low productivity but relatively high standing
crop (inferred from chlorophyll a measurements), the importance of algal
heterotrophy was considered.  Rodhe (1955) discusses this phenomenon con-
cerning lakes in high latitudes.  Thus, an experiment to measure an aspect of
algal heterotrophy was chosen to conclude the field work on November 14,
1975.

-------
                                  SECTION 2
                                 CONCLUSIONS

     1.  The falling water level of Harding Lake, which is a serious concern
of the lakeshore residents, is most probably due to the natural cycle of the
amount of precipitation.
     2.  Harding Lake may be classified as dimictic, but on rare occasions it
may not reach complete saturation with oxygen in the spring when thermal
stratification, initiated at the end of the ice-cover period, is not broken
because of absence of wind.
     3.  Concentrations of plant nutrients C, N, and P are currently moderate
in Harding Lake, but future management decisions should protect the lake from
additions of these nutrients.
     4.  Harding Lake supports low algal production comparable to other
oligotrophic lakes of high latitudes.  Reports of visible algal blooms on
Harding Lake can most likely be attributed to tree pollen that covers the
surface in the spring.
     5.  The growth of vascular aquatic plants is relatively less important
than the algal growth of Harding Lake.
     6.  Application of a  lake management model for the effects of nutrient
loading on algal growth adequately describes peak growth, which occurs under
the ice in spring.  Should increased loading change algal succession patterns
so that peak growth occurred in summer, visable deterioration of water
quality would occur.
     7.  Heterotrophic algal growth may be important in this lake during
winter when light penetration is low due to heavy ice and snow cover and to
the short daylight period.

-------
     8.  Zooplankton biomass appears to be highest in late summer at about
ten times winter values.
     9.  The community of benthic chironomids found in this lake helps to
classify it as oligotrophic.
    10.  Bacterial contamination detected between 1966 and 1971  was most
likely due to improper sewage disposal methods at the state and  the U. S.
Army recreational areas.  At both areas pit privies were replaced by vault
toilets between 1970 and 1972, and during 1973 no excessive counts were
detected near either recreation area.

-------
                                  SECTION 3
                               RECOMMENDATIONS

     1.  Further research should be conducted on the potential for monomixis
in deep subarctic lakes.  Lakes more productive than Harding could suffer
summer oxygen content problems following a spring during which mixing was
not complete and the deep waters were not reoxygenated.
     2.  The hydrology of Harding Lake should be studied in some detail,
both to allow measurement of the water retention time and to provide those
who would manage the lake level with predictions of the results of certain
actions.  Japanese scientists from the Institute of Low Temperature Science
of Hokkaido University are attempting to obtain funds from the Japanese
government to study the  hydrology of Harding  Lake and to take and examine a
20-m core of its sediments.
     3.  Research should be  conducted on  the  relative  importance of the
benthic algae as primary producers  in subarctic  lakes.  This  production has
been found to be relatively  more  important  than  that of phytoplankton in
certain lake studies.
     4.  The sediments  of Harding Lake should be studied to ascertain their
role in the cycling of nutrients  into the dissolved phase.
     5.  Further research should  be conducted on heterotrophic algal production
in subarctic lakes.
     6.  Research should  continue concerning  the use of chironomids as
trophic state indicators  for lakes of subarctic Alaska.  This research
should be of both a taxonomic and ecological  nature.
     7.  Food-habit and production studies should be conducted on the fishes
of Harding Lake.  Research should also be carried out on production of
zooplankton in  this  lake.

-------
     8.  As the real estate surrounding Harding Lake continues to be
developed, the state agencies responsible should recommend pumped vault or
incinerating toilets prior to the time when a system of central treatment
becomes economical.  This action would protect the lake from one source of
increased nutrient  loading as well as from bacterial contamination.  The
use of pit privies  or septic tanks should be prohibited in areas where
the soil is unsuitable for proper operation.

-------
                                  SECTION 4
                          DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREA

     The geomorphological setting and the surface geology of the Harding
Lake area have been described in a thesis by J. Michael Blackwell (1965),
who also, in the course of his study, mapped the morphology of Harding and
Little Lakes (Figure 1) as well as that of Quartz, Birch, and Chisholm Lakes
of the same formation group.  His major conclusion was that these lakes were
most probably formed during the Delta (111Indian) glaciation when aggradation
of the Tanana River drowned tributary valleys.  His work gives good evidence
that the reasons that Harding Lake is so much deeper than its sister lakes,
Birch and Quartz, the major lakes of nearby valleys, are because of more
recent tectonic activity and reduced infilling.   He found strong evidence of
a linear fault along the deep axis of the lake and some evidence in the silt
on terraces north of the lake of an  ancient sudden rush of water from the
lake.  He speculates that the lake has  filled  in  with  sediments to a far
lesser degree than the sister lakes  due to the small size of the contributing
watershed and perhaps to a  lesser deposition  of eolian silt on its hills.
     Morphometrically, Harding Lake  (elevation 217 m)  is very close to
being conical in shape.  The hypsometric  curve is presented in Figure 2.
The ratio of mean to maximum depth (z/z ) is  16/43 = 0.37; the volume is
         83                            ^
1.59 x 10 m ; the volume development is 1.12; and the  relative depth is
2.4%.  The surface, 988 hectares in  area, has a shoreline development index
of 1.08 indicating how nearly circular  it is  in shape.  The average slope
for the lake is 2.4% or 24 m/km, but the  lake contains extensive shallows
with 33% of the surface area underlain  by water of 5 m or shallower.  The
drainage basin of the lake covers slightly more than 2,000 hectares giving
an extremely low potential  watershed input.   It should also be noted that in
this area the mean annual precipitation is only 30.5 cm,  with a mean annual
snowfall  of 127 cm,  accounting for about a third  of the annual  volume.   Of

-------
                                                            N
                                                            11
                                                    KM
-------
 0
  0
50-
100
1
200
 ~r
   AREA, hectares

300    400    500
600
700
800
900
1000
                               FIGURE  2

       HYPSOMETRIC  CURVE  FOR HARDING LAKE (after Blackwell, 1965)

-------
the snowpack, an estimated 20-30% is measurable as runoff, the difference
being intercepted or evaporated (Guymon, G. L., 1973, personal communication)
     Continuous flow into the lake is limited to a fractional cubic meter
per second provided by the undefined, swampy drainage of Little Lake and
another small stream draining the northeast area of the basin.  All other
drainages exhibit flow only during snowmelt or infrequent heavy rainfall.
     A limited study of the hydrology of the inlet on the northeast by our
group has shown that at one time the drainage basin included a section we
have named the potential watershed (Figure 3).  This was seen to be a possi-
bility upon examination of all available USGS maps of the area, some of
which showed the stream at the northeast entering the lake and others which
showed the stream diverging with one branch flowing out to the Salcha River.
Tracing that stream on foot our hydrologists have found the branch to the
Salcha River to contain standing dead trees indicating that it is somewhat
recent in development. Attempts to age these trees and nearby controls by
increment boring, however, have not proved possible because of interpreta-
tion difficulties.
     Information on the soil types in the Harding Lake watershed are avail-
able in Schoephorster (1973).  Very limited information concerning the shore
sequence of plant cover is presented by LaPerriere and Robertson (1973).
     The temperature regime of the area may be characterized as extreme with
a mean minimum January temperature of -27°C, with extreme lows of -53°C; a
mean maximum July temperature of 22°C, and extreme highs of 32°C; and a mean
annual temperature of -5°C (Johnson and Hartman, 1969).
     Snowfall is generally concentrated in the period after freeze-up (Watson
et al,, 1971), diminishing with the onset of winter conditions.  Winters are
characteristically clear with little wind.  Occasionally, however, lake ice
may be blown free of snow during the fall period.  This was the case in
1973, resulting in large wind-swept areas on Harding Lake.  The snowfall
during that winter was below the 127-cm annual average, therefore the possi-
bility of occasional light penetration into the ice covered lake in fall and
winter was demonstrated but observations through the winters of the study
did not confirm this possibility.
                                      11

-------
    WATERSHED
	POTENTIAL WATERSHED     \
                                FIGURE 3
                       WATERSHED MAP FOR HARDING LAKE

-------
     As a part of the study by Larson (1974), the shorelands around Harding
Lake were studied to determine the extent of development and the types and
conditions of sanitation facilities existing.  This survey included identifi-
cation of sewage disposal practices, water supply practices and the gathering
of descriptive information relative to characterization of development.
     The development area of Harding Lake contains some 400 individual land
parcels of which 262 are lake-front lots.  Nonetheless, some 38% of the
shoreline of the lake is undeveloped and most of this is in some form of
public ownership.  In general, the shoreline of Harding Lake is considered
to be highly developed when compared with recreation areas in the conter-
minous United States.  Land parcels at Harding Lake are small with a mean
               2
size of 2,216 m  .  Eighty percent of the lots at Harding Lake have lake
frontage of less than 30 m, and 77% of the cottages on lots at Harding Lake
have setbacks of less than 23 m from the shoreline.  Usage of private
cabins at the lake occurs primarily during the summer months.  The average
usage rate is about 46 days which is substantially less than the average
reported for second homes in the United States.  Total cabin usage is approxi-
mately 23,000 people-days for a one-year period.
     Five larger recreational facilities are located on the shores of Harding
Lake and they occupy a total of 1,900 m of the shoreline.   Primary use of
these facilities occurs during the summer months and each has an associated
swimming area.  These include the Farthest North Shriners1 Club, Camp Clegg
(Girl Scouts of America), Camp Bingle (Presbyterian Youth), a U. S. Army
recreation area, and a state recreation area.  The state recreation area
occupies some 975 m of lake shoreline and consists of the public bathing
beach, 89 campground units, 63 picnic units3 a general store concession and
several sports activity fields.  During fiscal year 1973, a total of 50,636
people visited the Harding Lake recreation area which makes it the second
most visited site in the Alaska park system.
     Water supplies at Harding Lake are quite varied with the most popular
method being the transport of water to the lake in containers.  Additionally,
potable water is supplied by a spring near the lake and through nine indi-
vidual wells. Untreated lake water is commonly used for some purposes,
including cleaning, flushing, and washing.

                                      13

-------
     A large number of sewage disposal methods are used at Harding Lake;
however, no community sewage collection or treatment exists.  Disposal
methods include the use of privies (almost 80%), chemical toilets, cesspools,
septic tank systems, holding tanks, and incinerator toilets.  Some of the
soil types in the Harding Lake area are considered to be extremely poor
relative to soil treatment of wastewater discharge and pit privies and
septic tank systems should be discouraged in such areas.  It is believed
that the best alternative sewage disposal method for the control of waste-
water discharge would be one of collection and central treatment.  It is
recognized, however, that such a system may be impractical because of remote-
ness and a relatively small seasonal population.  In general a  lack of
satisfactory shoreland zoning ordinances, especially with regard to setback
requirements, exists.
                                     14

-------
                                  SECTION 5
                            MATERIALS AND METHODS
GENERAL
     Field crews were transported to sampling stations by boat during the
ice-free season and by snowmachines when the ice cover had formed.   The boat
ordinarily used was a (7.3-m) flat-bottomed boat powered by a 50.7  horse-
power (metric) outboard motor.  The bow of the boat was fitted with a crane
and winch for lowering and raising heavy equipment.  The snowmachines were
equipped with sleds for hauling equipment, and one sled was a metal facsimile
of a dogsled allowing one rider at the rear.
     Trips onto the unstable ice of late spring were made on foot by personnel
wearing neoprene wet suits, hauling equipment in a 2.7-m inflatable rubber
boat. Profiles were run at stations located by sighting to landmarks from
boat or snowmachine and comparing depth, sounded by sonar, to the morpho-
metric map. (Figure 1).
CLIMATOLOGY
     Climatological data were collected intensively during the summer season
of 1974.  Precipitation data were collected daily using a standard  20.3-cm
(8") diameter rain gauge containing a funnel collector allowing measurement
to the nearest .025 cm (.01").
     Daily high and low air temperatures were measured using standard U. S.
Weather Bureau thermometers mounted on stainless steel backs and a Townsend
support.  These were housed in an all-wood instrument shelter built to
Weather Bureau standards.
     To measure pan evaporation, an evaporation station was set up in an
open area near the permanent field station.  The station consisted of a
United States class A pan 25.4 cm (10") in depth and 120.65 cm (47.5")
                                      15

-------
in diameter mounted on an open framework about 10.2 cm (4") above the ground,
allowing air to circulate under the pan.  A hook gauge inside a stilling
well was used to measure evaporation and wind movement over the pan was
measured with a contact anemometer reading in miles of wind movement.  Pan
water surface temperatures were measured with a shielded floating maximum-
minimum thermometer.  Relative humidity was measured using a standard sling
psychrometer.
     All instruments were installed and measurements taken according to
procedures outlined by the World Meteorological Organization (1970).
PHYSICAL LIMNOLOGY
Depth, Temperature, Electroconductivity, pH, and Dissolved Oxygen
     Depth profiles of the lake for temperature, dissolved oxygen, hydrogen
ion and conductivity were determined in situ with a Martek Mark II Water
Quality Monitoring System.  Temperature is determined both separately and in
conjunction with the oxygen subunit of this system.  Depth is measured by a
diffused silicon diaphragm pressure transducer.
     The system includes a transducer array on a 46-m electrical cable and a
control/display unit.  Power is provided by a battery pack in the control/
display unit, with outputs read on 8.4-cm (3.25") taut-band meters with
mirrored scales which give maximum stability under pitch and roll.  Range
switches on depth, oxygen, pH, and conductivity allowed fairly accurate
determination of these values, but the lack of a range switch for either tem-
perature scale was found to be a serious deficiency.
     The hydrogen ion concentration as its negative logarithm, pH, is
determined by a sealed glass Ag-AgCl cell with pressure equalization and
temperature compensation and a reference electrode.  The sensor unit also
includes a preamplifier to convert the high impedance output of the glass
electrode to a low impedance signal for transmission through the cable.  The
calibration functions include zero, asymmetry, and slope which allow the
calibration and span to be set accurately.  The calibration procedure is
conducted in the laboratory prior to field work.  The pH unit is extremely
stable and may be used for long periods without recalibration as was
                                     16

-------
confirmed by frequent checks with buffer standards.  As the cell output is
temperature compensated, measurements through the thermocline were possible
without extensive equilibration time.
     Dissolved oxygen is determined by a pressure-equalized polarographic
oxygen electrode.  The electrode is equipped with a vibrating-wand stirring
mechanism to create a constant flow across the electrode face to prevent
depletion of oxygen at the electrode.  This stirring unit malfunctioned
several times and, until repaired, necessitated manual movement of the
electrode with the cable until a constant output was obtained.  Results from
summer of the third year are in error and will not be reported since the
pressure-equalizing diaphragm failed, resulting in dilution of the support-
ing electrolyte  upon immersion.
     Where necessitated by sensor failure and for calibration purposes,
oxygen was determined by Winkler titration according to standard methods
(APHA, et al., 1971).  A stainless steel sewage sampler was utilized to
obtain samples.  Since the oxygen was at or near saturation, displacement of
air from the sampler was not believed to be a significant source of error,
particularly since the scale of the oxygen sensor only allows estimation to
0.1 mg/1 and is  accurate to no more than 0.2 mg/1.  Calibration of the
sensor was usually conducted by the temperature-saturation method.
     Electrical  conductivity is not temperature-compensated in this unit.  A
calibration curve was established and conductivity values corrected with the
use of simultaneous temperature data.
Light Penetration
     Light penetration was routinely measured during the ice-free season
with a Secchi disk.  The disk used during the summer of 1973 was a 20-cm
limnological style disk painted in alternating quadrants of black and white.
During the remainder of the project, a 50-cm oceanographic style white disk
was used.
     Occasionally, light penetration was measured with a GM submarine photo-
meter consisting of a matched set of Weston photocells encased under opal
glass filters in a gimballed deck cell and a finned sea cell.  The penetration
                                     17

-------
of red, blue, and green light was measured by attaching the appropriate
filters under the opal glass filter on the sea cell.
CHEMICAL LIMNOLOGY
Sampling
     Samples for nutrient analysis were collected with a 4- or 6-liter Van
Dorn sampler and, in a few cases, with a portable peristaltic sampling pump.
Samples to be analyzed immediately, such as alkalinity, were placed in
collapsible plastic cube-shaped containers while samples to be stored were
placed in acid-washed plastic bottles and frozen.
Ammonia
     Ammonia was determined by the automated phenol-hypochlorite method as
outlined in the USEPA Methods for Chem.'loal Analysis of Water and Wastes
(1971).  Reagent flow rates were reduced relative to sample flow to minimize
dilution of the extremely low ammonia levels encountered in Harding Lake.
At concentrations around the detection limit of 5 pg/1 as nitrogen we en-
countered problems similar to those of scientists studying Lake Tahoe
(Goldman, 1974).  Contamination of the samples in the laboratory atmosphere
was a serious problem demonstrated by the appearance of large spikes between
samples.  Efforts to eliminate this interference were largely unsuccessful.
Clasby, R. C., (1974, personal communication) indicated that this problem
was a persistent one in ammonia determinations at such low levels.
     During the second year of the project, an attempt was made to determine
ammonia at the new field station using a manual phenol-hypochlorite method
(Environment Canada, date unknown).  Ammonia analysis was terminated shortly
thereafter as consistent values at or below the detection limit throughout an
annual cycle were indicative of a low concentration situation in the lake and
more detailed data did not warrant the time required for careful analysis
(Alexander, V. A., 1974, personal communication).
     The data which were obtained must be regarded as estimates, particularly
where concentrations are reported at or below the detection limit of 5 ug/1.
At such low levels, there is also the possibility of error from storage
losses, even though these were minimized by analysis of fresh samples.

                                      18

-------
Reeburgh, W. S., (1974, personal communication) indicated the feasibility of
trace ammonia analysis by stripping ammonia from a sample with an inert gas,
after making the sample sufficiently basic to drive the equilibrium to free
ammonia.  The ammonia could then be trapped in a boric acid solution and
concentration determined by a conductometric method using a differential
conductivity cell.  Such a method had not been standardized, however, and
could not be developed by this  project.
Organic  Nitrogen and Ammonia
     It  had been intended to determine  total Kjeldahl nitrogen and total
phosphorus  simultaneously, utilizing a  Technicon Auto-Analyzer with a
continuous  digestion unit.  Difficulties with the operation of the unit and
especially  poor results with total phosphorus resulted in termination of
attempts to run the analyses by Kjeldahl digestion.  Gales and Booth (1974)
report excellent recoveries of  both phosphorus and nitrogen by a vanadium
pentoxide catalized digestion procedure.  Personal communication with Gales,
M.  E.  (1975) revealed problems  in pH control of the phosphorus side of the
determination which is highly dependent on acidity.  The recommendation was
to  use a manual phosphorus digestion, using a Technicon continuous digestor
if  possible, and independent nitrogen determination.
     Because of scheduling problems with the Technicon continuous digestion
unit,  it was decided that a manual organic nitrogen method would be used.
The method  for organic and ammonia nitrogen was taken from the USEPA methods
manual  (1971).  In this procedure, organic nitrogen is manually digested
with sulfuric acid and potassium persulfate,  with subsequent determination
of  the resulting ammonium sulfate by the phenol-hypochlorite procedure
utilizing the automated colorimeter.
Nitrite/Nitrate
     Nitrate and nitrite were initially determined by the automated hydrazine
reduction method (USEPA, 1971)  which reduces nitrate to nitrite.  The nitrite
is  then  determined by diazotization with sulfanilamide and coupling with N-
(l-napthyl)-ethylenediamine dihydrochloride to form a highly colored
absorbing species.  An alternate method, using a copper cadmium amalgam
reduction column, was not initially used as prior experience with the system

                                        19

-------
allowed us to be aware of the tendency of the column to plug and channelize.
However, in 1975 the improved cadmium reduction method of Stainton (1974)
was incorporated.
     This method utilizes a 1-m  length of cadmium wire jacketed in a length
of Teflon tubing.  This column is coiled and attached to the Auto-Analyzer
manifold.  The nitrite produced  by the column is determined as  in the hydra-
zine method.
     The amalgamation and regeneration procedure for  this column followed
the recommendations of Clasby, R. C.  (1975,  personal  communication).  Ten ml
of distilled/deionized water was alternated  with 10 ml of 10%  HC1, 10 ml of
2% HgCU, and 10 ml of EDTA, beginning and ending with a water rinse.
Phosphorus
     Total  phosphorus was determined  by  manual  digestion according to the
ammonium persulfate method  and  subsequent  quantitation  by  the  single reagent
method  (USEPA,  1971).
     The digestion procedure followed the  method published  in  Methods for
Chemical Analysis  of Water  and Wastes (USEPA,  1971) with the addition of
the neutralization step  with phenolphthalein indicator.   This  procedure is
similar to  the  more recent procedure (USEPA, 1974)  which differs  only in
strength  of the strong acid solution and utilizes  a potentiometric (pH)
neutralization.  The single reagent method is unchanged in  the  1974 mannual.
     Some  orthophosphate analyses were attempted initially  in  the project by
the single  reagent method (USEPA, 1971)  and also by the  extraction procedure
of Shapiro  (1973).  As  with many of the  analyses,  low levels resulted in
difficulties  in  attaining reproducible results.  It also  became apparent
from the  literature (Rigler, 1964;  Schindler,  D.  W.,  1975,  persnnal commu-
nication) that  orthophosphate  is difficult to  determine  and the results
are often in question as  to reliability  and  interpretation.  As Vollenweider
(1971)  and others  are utilizing  total  phosphorus in interpreting  lake
nutrient status, it was eventually decided to determine total  phosphorus
only.
                                     20

-------
Inorganic Carbon
     Harding Lake itself contains negligible quantitites of humic material
and other species contributing to alkalinity apart from the carbonate
system. Alkalinity values were then taken to be representative of the
inorganic carbon in the lake.
     Alkalinity was initially determined by potentiometric (pH) titration
with 0.02 N Sulfuric acid as outlined in Standard Methods for the Examination
of Water (APHA, et al. 3 1971) and graphical analysis of the end point.  This
procedure was later run at the same time as conductometric determination of
the end point according to the method of the International Biological
Programme (Golterman, 1969).  The conductometric method was found to give a
sharply defined equivalence  point and was adopted.
Total Organic Carbon
     At the outset of the project, total organic carbon was determined on a
Beckman Carbonaceous Analyzer.  Concentrations in Harding Lake were found to
be near the detection limit  of the instrument.  Since the variability of the
analysis was greater than that likely to occur in the lake, the analysis was
discontinued.
BIOLOGICAL LIMNOLOGY
 Direct Counts--
     Samples  for  direct  counts  of  plankton  population were taken with a non-
 metallic Van  Dorn sampler  and each 100-ml sample was placed  into a glass
 bottle containing 10  ml  of Lugol's iodine.   Upon reaching the  laboratory,
 the  sample  bottles were  thoroughly shaken and  5 ml  from  each sample was
 placed in a settling  chamber and allowed to settle  for approximately 24
 hours.
     Transects across the  area  of  the counting chamber were  examined using
 400x magnification on an inverted  microscope.  Usually 1/4 of  the  chamber
 was  examined, but 1/2 chamber was  counted when low  numbers were encountered,
                                      21

-------
 Chlorophyll a  and  Phaeophytin—
      Chlorophyll a content of  the  algae was  determined  according to  the
 method  delineated  by Strickland  and  Parsons  (1965).  Approximately two
 liters  of water were filtered  through  a glass-fiber  filter  under reduced
 light conditions and with the  vacuum controlled at 15-20 cm of mercury.   The
 filters were frozen until the  extraction  could be carried out.  Phaeophytin
 was  determined on  acidified extracts according to the  method presented  in
 the  IBP manual, Chemloal Analysis  of Fresh Water (Golterman, 1969).
 Autotrophic Primary Productivity-
      Algal primary productivity was  measured in a light- and dark-bottle
 test following Goldman (1963)  with the following modifications.  The samples
 were taken with a  nonmetallic  Van  Dorn sampler and distributed to two light
 bottles and one dark bottle for each depth.   The dark bottles were prepared
 by dipping the typical borosilicate reagent bottles  of approximately 125-ml
 size in black latex and taping with two layers of black electrical tape.
 The top of the ground glass stopper was treated  in the same way and the cap
 and neck were covered with aluminum foil during  incubation to exclude all
 light.
      The bottles were each  innoculated with 5 microcuries  (yCi) of radio-
 active sodium bicarbonate  NaH*CO~ and secured on their sides  in plexiglass
 holders along a buoyed  and  anchored cord.   In the winter the cord was
 suspended from a wooden  dowel placed across the  access hole and the hole  was
 covered with materials  opaque to  light, usually  snow.  The incubation
 period was routinely  24  hours as  had been recommended by Hobbie (1962).   At
 the end of the incubation  period  each bottle  was placed in an insulated
 light-tight box and filtration of either the  whole bottle or a 50-ml aliquot
 was  conducted as quickly as possible through  a 2.5-cm diameter1 0.45-um
 membrane filter.
      Filtration vacuum was controlled  at 15-20 cm of mercury to prevent
 lysis of cells.  All manipulation  of the  samples was carried out under
 reduced light  conditions to prevent  damage to  light-sensitive cells.  The
 filters  were not dried but were immediately  dropped  into  10 ml  of Aquasol,
 a liquid  scintillation cocktail which dissolves the filter  and  is miscible
with water.  Drying  of the  filters was avoided  in order to prevent
                                      22

-------
autorespiration of labeled cell material which is a problem associated with
slow death of labeled cells (Law, A. T., 1974, personal communication).
     Counting was conducted in an ambient temperature liquid scintillation
counter for three 10-minute periods for each vial.  Corrections were made
for quench and background.  Calculations were performed based on those
presented in the IBP manual on primary  production (Vollenweider, 1969a).
     Alkalinity, a measurement of the nonradioactive carbon (C-12) available
to plants in the natural aquatic system, was measured for each depth at
which productivity was measured.
     During the first phase of the project, an attempt was made to measure
algal productivity using the acidification-bubbling technique of Schindler,
Schmidt, and Reid (1972).  At the same  time an attempt was made to modify
the technique to allow the use of miniature scintillation vials to reduce
the use of the expensive liquid scintillation cocktail.  These two modifica-
tions were abandoned as being incompatible with the low productivity situ-
ation encountered.
Heterotrophic Production—
     Heterotrophic production of the algae and bacteria was measured follow-
ing the methods outlined in the paper by Maeda and Ichimura (1973).  Numbered
borosilicate bottles were filled with lake water taken from 3 m, and carbon-
14 labeled glucose was added in triplicate at concentrations of 0.018, 0.036,
0.072, 0.144, and 0.288 mg/1.  Other bottles were filled and triplicate
treatments of carbon-14 labeled sodium  acetate at concentrations of 0.00024,
0.00047, 0.00094, 0.00188, and 0.00376  mg/1 were set up.  One set of concen-
trations of each treatment was immediately killed with Lugol's iodine.  A
different set of all concentrations of  each treatment was dosed with strepto-
mycin at 3 mg/1.  The bottles were incubated in situ for 21 hours well away
from the access hole in the ice.  A slit was cut with a 1.5-m ice saw and
the rope suspending the incubation rack was moved from the access hole to
the end of the slit and anchored.  The  hole and slit were covered with
enough snow to exclude light.  Filtration and counting were conducted in the
same manner as for the algal primary productivity experiments.
                                      23

-------
Vascular Aquatic Plants
     The beds of vascular aquatic plants were mapped by a skin diver who
delineated the extent of the bed with a marked  line.  The water depth was
measured at equally  spaced  intervals with a weighted, marked line by a
person  in a boat who was recording  data.
     At the height of the growing season stands that were noted to  be pure
                                                               -1 2
(of only a single species)  were  sampled with  either a 3.57  x 10  m
                      -2 2
quadrat or a  5.29 x  10  m   Ponar dredge.  The above-ground  biomass  was
separated, dried and weighed,  providing a biomass  estimate  for 100% cover of
that species.
     Transects were  then  laid  out  in  the plant beds perpendicular to the
shoreline and percent cover of each species  was estimated  by a diver for a
         -1 2
3.57 x  10  m   quadrat sample placed every  5  m from shore to the outer edge
of the  plant  bed.
Zooplankton
Net Hauls—
     Zooplankton  were  routinely sampled by 20-m vertical hauls with a small
 (76 cm  long x 13  cm mouth diameter) Wisconsin  net with a mesh  size  of 76
microns.   The samples  were washed  into 20-ml glass vials with  either dis-
tilled  water  or 90% ethanol (in winter).   Upon return to the  laboratory
these  vials  were  emptied into tared weighing pans and dried in a 60°C oven
for 24  hours  to a constant weight.
Traps--
     Zooplankton  were  occasionally sampled with a clear plexiglass  rectangu-
                  q
lar trap  (0.074 m )  lowered and raised by  means of a  winch. The trap has
hinged  doors  at the  top and bottom that swing open as the  trap falls through
the water column  and close  as  the trap begins its return to the surface.  A
plankton bucket (158-micron mesh)  is  attached near the  bottom  of the trap so
that the entire contents of the  trap  are filtered.  The contents of the
plankton bucket were washed into 300-ml polyethylene  bottles with filtered
lake water and 10 ml of Lugol's  iodine solution were added.  In the labora-
tory,  ten 1-ml subsamples were taken with a Hensen-Stempfle pipette and all
fields  were counted  in  a Sedgewick-Rafter counting cell.
                                     24

-------
Benthic Macroinvertebrates
     Sampling was accomplished with a standard 15.24-cm square Ekman dredge.
Each sample was immediately washed free of sediments in a #30 mesh (590
micron) screen-bottomed bucket, and the remaining contents were washed into
a 1.14-liter jar.  Alcohol was added to bring the concentration to approxi-
mately 25% by volume and the samples were returned to the laboratory where
they were refrigerated at 5°C until the organisms were picked.
     Picking was accomplished on the entire sample by diluting subsamples in
white enamel pans and separating the organisms from the debris with forceps.
The organisms were separated to order and stored in 90% ethanol until identi-
fied.
     Chironomid larvae from the 1973 samples were prepared for identification
by preparing head capsule mounts on glass slides.  Each chironomid so pre-
pared was heated in 5% KOH for fifteen minutes (or immersed overnight in
cold KOH) and rinsed in distilled water, then the head was dissected onto a
glass slide and covered with a water-miscible mounting medium.  After
checking that the head was in position with teeth uppermost, a cover slip
and label were affixed.  The body was left on the slide if it were suffi-
ciently small and flattened.
     The samples for the rearing effort were taken with a standard Ponar
dredge or by hand and treated as above except that ethanol was not added to
the quart jars.  Picking was accomplished almost immediately at the field
laboratory located at the lake.  Each chironomid larva or pupa was placed in
a separate 10-ml vial with clean lake water and the vial was plugged with
cotton.
     Daily checks were conducted on all vials so that the adults and associ-
ated ecdyses could be preserved.  As soon as an adult was observed in a
vial, the vial was placed in an ethyl acetate killing jar, when the cotton
could be removed 90% ethanol was added, and a screw cap affixed.  The dis-
sected adults and associated ecdyses were later mounted and identified.
Enteric Bacteria
     All bacteriological analyses  (standard plate counts, total coliform,
and fecal coliform) were performed by the Fairbanks laboratory of the Alaska

                                      25

-------
Departmen      
-------
                                  SECTION 6
                           RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

CLIMATOLOGY
Heat Budget
     From the thermal data taken, it was possible to estimate the heat
budgets of Harding Lake for three years  (1973, 1974 and 1975).  The calcu-
lated heat budgets include the energy required to heat the water in the
lake from the minimum temperature to the maximum temperature, and the
amount of energy needed to melt all ice on the lake.  The energy required
to heat the ice from its minimum temperature to the melting point is compara-
tively small and was not calculated.

        TABLE 1.  HEAT BUDGET ESTIMATES FOR HARDING LAKE—1973-1975


Year
1973
1974
1975
Ice
thickness
(cm)
81
100
77
Heat needed
to melt ice
(cal/cm2)
5,941
7,309
5,612
Winter heat*
income
(cal/cm2)
8,991
10,819
9,292
Summer heat**
income
(cal/cm2)
8,700
10,196
10,770
Annual
heat budget
2
(cal/cm )
17,691
21,015
20,062

 *winter heat income is that amount of heat necessary to melt the ice and
  heat all lake water to 4°C.
**summer heat income is that amount of heat necessary to raise the water
  temperature from 4°C to its maximum.
                                      27

-------
In the heat budget calculations, the total  area of the lake was  taken  to
           in   9
be 9.9 x 10   cm ; this, of course, varied slightly with the water level
during a given year.
     A thermal regime of a shallow (3m) arctic lake (Imikpuk Lake, 70°N) at
Barrow, Alaska, reported by Brewer (1958) gives an approximate annual  heat
budget of around 14,000 cal/cm2 of which 90% is accounted for by ice cover.
This occurs in an area having a thawing index of about 500 degree days
compared with 3000 degree days for Harding Lake.
     A deep arctic lake (Schrader Lake 69°N) has a summer heat budget of
                         p
approximately 9000 cal/cm  (Hobbie, 1973).  No winter heat budgets are
reported but ice thicknesses are somewhat greater than Harding which would
put its annual heat budget somewhat above Harding.  Since the thermocline
of Schrader is deeper, the maximum summer temperature generally runs half
that of Harding and in some years remains near 4°C when statification is not
set up.  Thus Schrader Lake cannot be  considered temperate, while Harding
Lake fits Hutchinson's  (1957) definition of a  temperate lake.
Hydrology
     In order to  obtain a  rough water  balance  for  Harding  Lake, climatolog-
ical data was collected throughout  the study  and  intensively  during the
summer of 1974.   As a  result  of these  measurements,  the following estimates
of water input to  the  lake were made for  June  1974  to June  1975 (given  in
terms of change  in  lake level):
     1.  Direct  rainfall  on  lake  =  16.5 cm  (6.5")
     2.  Rainfall  runoff  to  lake  from  immediate drainage area = 1.5 cm  (0.6")
     3.  Snowmelt  on  lake  =  13.0  cm  (5.1")
     4.  Snowmelt  runoff  to  lake  from  immediate drainage area = 6.6 cm  (2.6")
     5.  Input from stream at northeast end =  2.8 cm  (1.1")
     From the above, it is estimated that the  annual  total  lake input is
about 41 cm.  Evaporation was calculated from  pan measurements to be about
18 cm,  and since the lake level did not change appreciably, there must be a
net groundwater loss of about 23 cm.

                                     28

-------
     An adjoining drainage basin east of Harding Lake of about 2600 hectares
provides some input to the lake (Figure 3).  However, this stream is diver-
gent and splits into two streams about 3 km from the lake.  From stream-
gaging measurements, it appears that during times of high streamflow such as
the snowmen period, about 30% of the flow goes to Harding Lake and 70% to
the Salcha River.  During periods of low flow only approximately 10% flows
into the lake.
                                                                       o
     Base flow of the stream during the summer seemed to be about .07 m /sec
while the peak measured during the snowmelt period was slightly over
.6 m /sec.  The stream has apparently been divergent for some time, since
channel formation is fairly mature for both the divergent branches.  The
older channel is probably the one to the lake, but this is by no means
certain.
     It appears that it would be possible to control the lake level somewhat
by diverting more of the flow of the stream toward the lake during natural
periods of low lake level, but further studies would certainly be needed to
assess the total amount of available streamflow, the type of diversion
apparatus needed, and most importantly, the ideal lake level.  From stream-
flow measurements, it was estimated that if all available water had gone to
Harding Lake during 1975, the lake level would have been raised by over 10 cm.
However, the water available in the stream probably is highly variable from
year to year.
PHYSICAL LIMNOLOGY
Thermal Regime
     Figure 4 illustrates slightly more than two annual cycles of the
temperature regime of Harding Lake.  From this graph it could be inferred
that Harding Lake is dimictic, undergoing a complete mix top to bottom in
both autumn and spring.  While this is undoubtedly true for most years,
much evidence was seen for the possibility of an incomplete turnover in the
spring of occasional years.  During the late spring of 1974 while the lake
was still almost completely ice covered the field crew noted water consider-
ably warmer than 4°C close to the lower surface of the ice, though this
seemed to consist of a very thin layer easily disturbed by the probe assembly

                                     29

-------
OJ
o
                TEMPERATURE, °C
           Os—~iirrr\—r	,
                                                                              Surface-
          35
             MAY   JULY  SEPT   NOV.
                     1973
'JAN.
MAR.  MAY   JULY   SEPT.
           1974
NOV.  'JAN.
MAR.   MAY   JULY   SEPT
       1975
                                                FIGURE  4
                     ISOTHERMS-HARDING LAKE, WITH  ICE THICKNESS INDICATED

-------
of the Martek Mark II.  The existence of warm layers beneath melting ice was
attributed to flow of meltwater under the ice by Hutchinson (1957).  This
water is less dense even at 4°C than the water below because of low salt
content.
     The ice at that time was noted to be candled, that is, with long vertical
holes throughout the structure.  A good discussion of ice-melting phenomena
for arctic lakes, which describes thoroughly the process at Harding Lake, is
contained in a review paper by Hobbie (1973).  On May 31 the ice was observed
to cover approximately 67% of the lake surface; a wind arose that night and
the lake was essentially ice free on June 1.  This is a frequently observed
phenomenon attributable to ice candling, a condition wherein the ice cover is
composed of loosely packed ice candles.  These may be tipped easily by the
wind and then are rapidly melted by the warmer water.  The weather remained
windy through June 2 when our field crew observed..."heavy waves, fetching
towards the NE shore, approximately 6 m long and up to .6 m in height."  On
that day, measurements of various parameters showed the lake to be in full
wind-driven overturn.
     During the next winter a set of thermistors was attached to a wooden
post and frozen into the ice in such a position that the thermistors were
spaced every 0.15 m throughout the ice and water column to 1.8 m.  Heavy
snowfall caused depression of the ice allowing water to seep up within the
snow and when the latter froze, the thermistor cords, though bagged together
and tied high on the pole, froze into the ice.  On May 9, 1976, the entire
pole had melted free of the surrounding ice and was removed.  It was observed
that anything of different albedo than the ice, even a piece of white card-
board box lying on the ice, would melt down into the ice as radiation was
absorbed.
     On May 9 and May 21, a thermistor was lowered gently down a 0.15 m hole
which had been drilled with a power ice auger and left undisturbed for at
least a day.  Figure 5 illustrates the results found.  In both cases the
water was being warmed by solar radiation, and by May 21, this heating was
dramatic.  The ice was entirely gone by May 27, and, on May 29, measurements
showed the lake to be weakly stratified.  The reappearance of the 4°C iso-
therm while the ice was still on the lake followed by slowly strengthening
                                     31

-------
                  TEMPERATURE, °C
  2.5L
                       FIGURE 5
TEMPERATURES OBSERVED  UNDER ICE AT HARDING LAKE, MAY 1975
                           32

-------
        DEGREES,(°C.)
    5    10   15   20   25
   DEGREES, (°C.)
5   10   15   20   25

5
10
CO
o*
S] 15
l-
UJ
5.20
X
a. 25
Ul
o
30
35
40
\^^$i^^^
L )
1 O
-1 10
1
CO
r £ 15
/ MARCH 14, 1974 1-
/ UJ
L Is
A %—*
\ X
- \ £25
Ul
o
- . 30
35
- 1 40

-
-

—

-

—


—
-
—
7 i T j; T
'



MAY 21, 1975








DEGREES, (°C.) DEGREES, (°C.)
5 10 15 20 25 5 10. 15 20 25


5

,-. 10
CO
tt
Ul 1(-
!_ 15
Ul
^>
^20
X
1-
£25
o

30
35
40
r'l I I i
NO ICE
5




-


—


— i


1
- '
	 (
10

CO
DC 15
UJ
H
LU
MAY 29, 1975 2 20
'~"i
X
£ 25
UJ
o
30
35
40
f f
>/JUNE 3,7&/

/^^-^JULY16,I975
-


- i


-


-


—
-
-
f














                     FIGURE  6
TEMPERATURE PROFILES FOR SELECTED DATES. SPRING 1975,
HARDING LAKE
                            33

-------
stratification (Figure 6) shows an under-ice overturn that may or may not
have involved the deep water that spring.  Further evidence of the lack of
wind-driven reoxygenating circulation that spring is seen in Figure 7 where
it can be seen that water of low conductivity, probably meltwater, stayed
near the surface unmixed with the rest of the water column through ice-off
and until summer stratification was completely formed.  Unfortunately, the
necessity of repairs to the Martek system in early summer did not allow us to
get data to complete this conductivity plot to the end of the field work.
     If Harding Lake should miss a spring turnover and the resultant uptake
of dissolved oxygen the hypolimnion is expected to remain sufficiently well
oxygenated to support aquatic life.  This is due to the great volume of the
hypolimnion and the low productivity of  this lake.  However, for subarctic
lakes in general, this potential has important management implications,
especially for lakes more productive than Harding Lake, where the decomposi-
tion of dead plant and animal materials  settling into the hypolimnion could
use up the dissolved oxygen.
Dissolved Oxygen
     While it is recognized that biological activity  has much to do with
dissolved oxygen in a lake, the primary  influence on  dissolved oxygen content
in Harding Lake was found to be physical, that is, explainable through the
inverse relationship between temperature and concentration.
     Failure of the oxygen  probe of the  Martek system occurred during the
winter of 1973-1974 and again in June of 1975.   However, enough data was
obtained to provide some  knowledge of the oxygen conditions  in the lake.
Figure 8 illustrates the  actual dissolved oxygen content of  the water column
and Figure 9 illustrates  the relationship with temperature by showing how
close to complete saturation with oxygen the water was at various depths at
various times.  Supersaturation is seen  at about 6-8  m during the summers.
This is attributable to photosynthetic activity of the algae at depths suffi-
cient for the water to be isolated from  mixing except by the strongest
winds.
                                     34

-------
OJ
en
               CONDUCTIVITY, [i mho/cm at 20°C
          35
             MAY
JULY   SEPT.
  1973
                                                                     JAN.  MAR.
MAY  JULY   SEPT.
 1975
                                                 FIGURE  7
                                 ISOPLETHS OF ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY. HARDING LAKE

-------
CO
CTl
              DISSOLVED OXYGEN, mg/l
          Oi	,-
                                             SURFACE-
         35
            MAY  JULY  SEPT.   NOV.
                   1973
JAN.   MAR.
MAY   JULY
    1974
SEPT   NOV.
JAN.   MAR.
MAY   JULY
  1975
SEPT
                                               FIGURE 8
                                ISOPLETHS OF  DISSOLVED OXYGEN. HARDING LAKE

-------
       DISSOLVED OXYGEN, % saturation
                                                                          SURFACE-
   5 -
   10
S.  15

-------
 Light Penetration
      The characteristics  of light penetration of the water column on June 26
 1975, are illustrated in  Figure 10.   This  measurement was  conducted on other
 occasions during the ice-free seasons of the project and no significant
 differences were noted.   The particular pattern  shown, with green light
 penetrating to  greatest depth,  is characteristic of waters with a small
 amount of dissolved organic matter (Hutchinson,  1957).
      Secchi depths  were taken at frequent  intervals during the ice-free
 season, and these measurements  are illustrated in Figure 17.   A commonly used
 "rule of thumb" states that doubling  the Secchi  depth gives the compensation
 depth for algal productivity, that is,  the depth at which  photosynthesis
 equals respiration  and net productivity is zero  (Cole, 1974).   Examination  of
 Figure 17 shows this rule to be applicable to Harding Lake with some occasions
 when net productivity stopped either  above or below double the Secchi  depth.
 CHEMICAL LIMNOLOGY
 Ionic Composition
      The water  quality parameters and a cation/anion balance  for Harding Lake
 have been determined by the U.  S.  Geological  Survey, Table 2.   Other analyses
 have been reported  by Barsdate  (1966,  1967),  and selected  data is presented
 in  Tables 3 and 4.
      Of significance to the ionic composition of the lake  is  the small  area
 of  the  drainage basin, which  is  about equal  to the  surface of  the lake
 itself.   The  lake is  in a  transition  zone  between muskeg to the north and
 steep hills covered  with  deciduous  (aspen  and birch) and coniferous  (spruce)
 forest  on  the other  compass  points.   Since most  of  the drainage is  rapid from
 the  slopes, the residence  time  of liquid precipitation on  the  ground  is
 short.  Also reducing  potential  weathering of minerals are the extended
 period of  frozen ground and  the  high  proportion  of  snowfall which is  rapidly
 lost through sublimation or  evaporation  before the  ground  is thawed.
     Data  of Barsdate  (1966)  show the electrical  conductivity  of  Birch  Lake,
a lake of  the same formation  group as Harding  to  be  about  50%  greater than
that of Harding.  Relative abundance of  Mg, Ca, and  K  are approximately
                                      38

-------
 100
   10
z
UJ
UJ
o
IT
ID
C/5
                             HARDING  LAKE
                               June 1975
          RED
                                          GREEN
                          \
            _L
    0
8       12       16

   DEPTH, meters
20
24
                    FIGURE 10

        LIGHT PENETRATION. HARDING LAKE
                          39

-------
TABLE 2A.   WATER QUALITY,  HARDING LAKE,
JUNE 3, 1975 (PROVISIONAL) (USGS)
Parameter
Alk, T (as CaC03)
Aluminum T
Bicarbonate
Boron T
Calcium dis
Carbon T org
Chloride dis
Cobalt T
Color
Copper T
Fluoride dis
Hardness, noncarb.
Hardness, T
Iron dis
Magnesium dis
Manganese dis
Molybdenum T
TABLE 2B. CATION
Concentration
30
50
36
40
6.9
3.7
0.7
<50
7
30
0.1
0
27
10
2.3
0
0
AND ANION
mg/1
yg/1
mg/1
yg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
yg/1

yg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
yg/1
mg/1
yg/1
yg/1

inDLt 
-------
TABLE 3.  LIFINOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF HARDING LAKE, 1966.   (BARSDATE,  1967)

OJ
(U Q.
+s E
fO rd
Q OO
31 Mar 149
150
151
152
30 Apr 164
165
166
167
168
2 Jun 189
190
191
192
193
194
10 Jul 225
226
227
228
E
CL
Ol
Q
0.8
5
10
25
0.8
5
10
25
42
0
1
5
10
25
29
0
5
10
25
o
Q.
QJ
0.4
2.8
3.1
3.5
0.0
2.8
3.1
3.4
3.7
4.8
4.4
4.1
3.7
3.4

17.3
16.4
5.9
3.7
o
4-> CVI
•i —
•r- E
4-> O
O --v.
3 O
"O -C
C E
O 3.
75
69
69
70
81
99
80
60
96
48
53
69
74
70
71
62
64
67
66
en
E
0
Q
11.6
10.6
10.3
8.7
12.5
10.4
10.2
8.3
0.2

10.8
10.2
10.2
9.6
7.4
8.6
8.8
10.4
8.4
(13
OO
0
80
78
76
65
86
77
76
62
2

84
78
77
72
56
89
89
85
64
Q.
7.31
7.26
7.27
7.14
7.45
7.10
6.63
6.88
6.89
7.53
7.53
7.45
6.82
7.35
7.28
7.50
7.35
7.00
7.10
00 S_
• O Cc—
^. CJ r— (/]
i — n3 O -*->

0 E (00-
33 15
31 21
30 18
31 18
36 30
27 23
19 23
26 23
37 50
19 21
21 29
26 30
20
28
27 31
26 33
24 32
18 31
24 35
o> -^
+-> en
(13 E
0 i-
•r- O)
I^J | ^
S- 4->
tO ro
Q- 5!


0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
2.4
0.3
0.6
0.3


0.1
0.3
0.2
1.1
0.3
i
en
•r—
00
•=;)-
O
00


23
5
16
21
55
13
23

10

23
14
11
16
24
i
en
D-
1
o
D-


0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.10
0.00
0.10

0.10


0.00
0.00
0.00

et
1
cn
00
0


2.6
2.6
2.0
2.9
1.1
0.2
0.0

1.2

2.6
0.3
0.2
0.3
2.9
(continued)

-------
                                            TABLE  3  (continued)
           01
   -,un
•*-> (XI
•i- E
4-> O
O ~^
^ O
E E
O -1
O -— -
62
66
61
66
74
69
69
cn
E
O

Q
9.1
9.0
10.6
8.8
3.3
10.2
10.3
(13
GO

.
0
96
95
92
67
25
82
83


—r~
0-
7.68
7.68
7.36
7.11
6.96
7.18
7.18
oo
• 0
-^ O
i — re
 cn
0 E
h- — -
25
25
26
29
31
26
26
S-
O '—•
i — CO
o +->
O •!-
i- 13
O>
_l_j [ ^
to CL
3 "-^
31
32
32
33
185
31
30
cu -\
-i-> cn
0 S-
•<- CD
±j +j
S- +->
(T3 rd
D- S
0.4
0.3
0.5
0.1
1.0
0.5
0.3
i
cn
•r—
GO
1
O
•1 —
00
14
15
14
26
44



-------
TABLE 4.  CHEMISTRY OF SNOH. ICE, AND HATER.   HARDING LAKE.   (BARSDATE,  1967)



 CM >,O
•^ E" CO
4-> U T-
O ^-, i— r—
3 O «O -».
x> -c -v cn
c: E •— E

O -—'
5.2

118 44
11 11

81 36
9.8 4.8
o— -
i — (/)
O -4-*
0 ••-
C
S- D
OJ
-M •!->
03 d.
3 	
0
0
33
0
0
30
9
QJ \
•4-> en
n3 E
3
0 S-
•^ O)
4-i 4_>
s- -»->
(O (T3
D- S
10.3
3.8
0.0
0.7
0.2
0.0
1.7
,s
1 ^£
c^~ I
o o>
•r— ^3.
COx —
0
3
20
>1
0
23
27
^ 	 ^
0. 
-------
TABLE 4.  (continued)

Concentration (yg/1 )
Date
April 30, 1966
II

II


June 2, 1966
Sample
No.
169
170
163
172
173
164
195
Copper
Filtered
1.5
2.0
2.3
3.1
4.7
1.7
1.7
Total
1.9
3.2
1.4
3.5
5.3
2.4
2.0
Manganese
Filtered Total
1.8
1.9
3.9
7.8
2.0
1.4
5.2
6.9
4.4
3.7
3.6
2.1
1.8
5.9
Iron
Filtered
11
16
19
27
7.4
12
4.8
Total
365
115
25
69
22
27
36
Zinc
Total
4.1
11
1.7
7.1
17
3.8
4.3

-------
equal.   This might be expected from the common geologic settings of the
lakes,  but actual concentrations are 2 to 3 times greater for these elements
in Birch which has a substantially larger, flatter drainage.  This is sig-
nificant to the relative oligotrophy of Harding as it applies to nutrient
loading in a comparable manner.
     The ionic composition of the lake is bicarbonate type of moderate
hardness.  A comparison of the cationic composition to the average composi-
tion of the world rivers (Clark, 1924) shows the Mg/Ca ratio to be somewhat
higher but not unusually so.  Hutchinson (1957) points out that the
composition of open lakes approximates the average river composition due to
source materials and exchange reactions.

        TABLE 5.  CATION COMPOSITION OF WORLD RIVERS VS. HARDING LAKE


Ca
Mg
K
Na
Mean river
concentration (%)
63.5
17.4
3.4
15.7
Harding Lake
concentration (%)
55.5
30.5
3.8
10.6

     The reported compositions are consistent with the geology of the Yukon-
Tanana Upland.  These low-lying hills are covered with wind-blown loess
composed of quartz, feldspar, and mica, particularly on slopes with a
southern aspect.  The bedrock, exposed in some areas, consists of granitic
material and Birch Creek Schist, a quartz-mica schist.  These silicaceous
materials are relatively inert to weathering and dissolution, contributing
relatively small amounts of calcium and bicarbonate to the lake compared to
the potential contributions of limestone and other carbonate formations
found in other areas of Alaska.
                                      45

-------
Hydrogen Ion Concentration
     The results of our measurements of hydrogen ion concentration, as the
negative logarithm, pH, are shown in Figure 11.  Failure of the reference
electrode during two periods of the field work of this project cause the
patterns of fall and early winter to remain unknown.  The 6.6 and 6.8 lines
which appear only at the beginning of the project may be an artifact due to
the initial use of a pH meter which is not thermally compensated on samples
taken from a Van Dorn sampler.  This was necessary while the Martek multi-
probe system was being refitted for the work on this lake with a longer cord
and a more sensitive electroconductivity transducer.
     The patterns shown are typical for a lake of moderate alkalinity where
the carbonate system buffers against any major changes.   Slightly increased
pH is seen near the surface during the height of the plant-growing season,
as expected.

Nutrient Chemistry
Carbon—
     Inorganic carbon was routinely measured as bicarbonate alkalinity as
part of the procedure of measuring algal primary productivity.  Alkalinity
values ranged between 11.8 and 42.3 mg/1 as CaCO.-., averaging 31.0 ± 3.5
mg/1.  Bicarbonate alkalinity values were converted to the concentration of
carbon present by means of the table of Saunders, Trama, and Bachmann (1962)
which corrects for In situ temperature and pH differences.  On at least two
occasions, paired samples were both titrated for alkalinity and analyzed for
dissolved inorganic carbon in a Fisher-Hamilton gas partitioner (chromato-
graph) according to the method of Stainton (1973) and the results were
identical.  Thus it was concluded that alkalinity provided an adequate
measure of inorganic carbon.  As was mentioned in the Methods section,
organic carbon was measured on initial samples and then this measurement was
abandoned as the Harding Lake samples varied little, remaining near 5 mg/1
the detection limit of the instrument.
                                     46

-------
     MAY
JULY   SEPT
   1973
NOV.
JAN.  MAR.   MAY
 JULY
1974
SEPT.   NOV.
JAN.  MAR.
MAY  JULY
 1975
SEPT.
                                      FIGURE  11
ISOPLETHS OF  HYDROGEN ION CONCENTRATION AS THE NEGATIVE LOGARITHM, pH . HARDING LAKE

-------
Nitrogen--
     Niirate/nitrite measurements for Deep Station I for most of the first
year of the project are shown in Figure 12.  The same information for most
of 1975 is illustrated in a slightly different way in Figure 13.  The
remaining species of nitrogen, ammonia and organic nitrogen were measured
together during 1975 and these data are presented in Tables 6 and 7 since
there was little variation in this composite measurement rendering graphical
illustration unnecessary.  As was mentioned in Methods, ammonia was measured
by itself during the first year of the project, but problems with contami-
nation caused us to abandon this effort.  The small amount of ammonia data
obtained is presented in Appendix Table A-l.  It should again be noted that
the stated detection limit of the method used was 5 yg/1 as N.
     The nutrient cycles of ammonia and nitrate for Harding Lake display a
vernal decline to below detectability which continues throughout the summer.
Onset  of autumnal circulation and corresponding physical conditions restores
these  nutrients to their predepletion levels.  Observation of this type of
cycle  are common and are reported extensively in the literature for both
marine and limnological systems (Steele and Baird, 1961; Stewart and Markello
1974;  Lueschow et al.„ 1970; Gruending and Malanchuk, 1974; and Schindler
and Nighswander, 1970).  This phenomenon is attributed to assimilation by
bacteria and phytoplankton at the onset of the vernal production and subse-
quent mineralization of cellular nitrogen during autumnal die-off and decline
in production.
     In terms of concentration of nitrate and ammonia, Harding Lake is very
similar in both cycling and concentration to Lake Tahoe (Lake Tahoe Area
Council, 1971), considered to be a hyperoligotrophic lake.  Unfortunately,
most of the work on other Alaskan lakes is such that the results do not lend
well to comparison since many are reconnaissance-type studies (Barsdate and
Alexander, 1971; LaPerriere and Casper, 1976) or are obviously not morphologi-
cally comparable (Alexander and Barsdate, 1971).  Some reports on lakes in the
arctic, such as Char Lake, (72°42'N, 94°50'W) (Schindler et al., 1974) or
Lake Peters (69°19'N, 145°03'W) (Hobbie, 1962) which are clearly oligotrophic,
show inorganic nitrogen levels comparable to those of Harding Lake.
                                     48

-------
      40 m
  20
LU
CD
O
OC.
LJ
h
 i
LU

5
OC
   10
5
                       HARDING   LAKE
       APRIL     MAY      JUNE     JULY
                                 AUG.
SEPT.
                                      1973
OCT.      NOV.
DEC.
                                  FIGURE  12

                ISOBATHS-NITRATE  AND NITRITE NITROGEN. HARDING LAKE

-------
         N03+N02-N,  pg/l.
Surface*
CO
o>
"cu
£
Q_
LU
Q
   30-
          FEB.
          OCT.
                           FIGURE  13
      ISOPLETHS OF NITRATE AND NITRITE CONCENTRATION. HARDING LAKE
                              50

-------
TABLE 6.  ORGANIC AND AMMONIA NITROGEN (mg/1  as N)
       HARDING LAKE.  1975.  DEEP STATION I

Depth
(m)
1
2
3
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
25
30
35
40
Jan 16

.13±.02

.22±.00
.16±.02
.12
.18±.01
.21±.04
.16±.03







Feb 22 Mar 21

.18±.02 .15±.05
.19±.04 .22±.04
.14±.01
.20±.02
.12±.02 .16±.04
.17±.06 .13±.04


.20±.10

.14±.02 .16±.04
.19±.10
.23±.02
.20±.00

Apr 11
.15
.25±.09

.17±.05
.17±.03
.16±.01
.32±.06




.43

.25±.08
.20
.32±.06
May 2 May 7 May 20

.23 .15±.04 .29
.23±.06
.22±.12 .15±.02 .24+. 04
.24±.06 .38
.18 .42
.29±.13 .15


.34

.10±,02
.20
.2U.07
.15
.20
May 28 Jim 3
.15
.08
.34
.18
.11 .16±.04
.12
.20
.16
.16
.16

.20
.14
.12


                                                            (continued)

-------
                                               TABLE 6 (continued)
en
ro
Depth
(m)
1
2
3
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
25
30
35
40
Jun 9
.22
.24±.00
.12±.02
.16±.03
.26
.18
,15±.04
.18
.11
.19
,09±.03
.23±.04
.14±.04
.1U.06


Jun 18
.23


.22
.18
.12
.14
.10
.25
.14
.15

.19
.06
.24

Jun 25
.21±.10
.28±.ll
.21+. 08
.24±.09
.15±.05
.10±.05
.16±.03
.18±.01


.27

.16±.04



Jul 16
.26
.10
.22
.14
.29
.12
.09

.11
.21±.14
.10
.09
.10
.27
.14

Jul 30
.19±.08
.22±.01
,20±.05
.15±.05
.22±.01
.20
.19±.10
.20±.04
.29±.04
.18±.02
.20±.02
.18±.05
.17±.07
.20±.04
.21

Aug 13
.19±.08
.15±.04
.19±.06
.16±.08
.13±.04
.19±.07
.17±.06
.18
.17±.06
.15±.06
.27±.03
.20±.06
.22±.10
.11±.03


Aug 25
.12
.19±.06
.10
.11±.02
.14±.06
.17±.05
.22
.18
.12±.04
.17±.01
.30±.02
.14±.02
.18
.12±.00


Sep 12
.23±.00
.14±.01
.14±.01
.17±.07
.26±.ll
.16±.02
.17±.05
.10±.05
.23±.08
.18±.06
.19±.07
.2i±.n
.12±.04

.68

Oct 13
.27±.17
.14±.01
.16±.00
.17±.02
.18+. 07
.21
.25±.10
.17±.ll
.16±.04
.18
.28
.20±.06
,15±.07
.20±.02



-------
             TABLE 7.   ORGANIC AND AMMONIA NITROGEN  (mg/1  as  N)
                   HARDING LAKE.   1975.   SHALLOW  STATIONS
Depth   	February 22	   	March 21	
 (m)      S-I      S-II     S-IV     S-V       S-I       S-II     S-IV    S-V
  1               .10                                          .28±.05
  2                                                            .14
  3                                                            .10
  4               .12
  5
  6               .14±.00
  7
  8               .18
  9
 10               .13±.03
 11
 12               .13±.01

        	April 11	   	May 3	
  1               .25±.06  .21                                 .20±.03
  2               .16±.03  .2U.04
  3                        .14±.01
  4              .19±.08
  5
  6              .13±.03
  7
  8              .14±.02
  9
 10              .17±.02
 11
 12

                                                            (continued)
                                     53

-------
TABLE 7 (continued)
Depth
(m)
1
2
3
4

1
2
3
4

1
2
3
4

1
2
3
4
May 28
S-I S-II S-IV S-V S-I
.30 .13 .14
.52 .15
.23 .18 .30±.05
.03
July 16
.24 .11 .llt.Ol
.20 .16 .21±.05
.14 .18+. 08
.11 .12±.04
August 13
.30±.08 .37 .28±.12
.33±.16 .10 .10
.25±.12 .13+.00 .22±.02
.37+.06
October 13
.20±.06 .16±.01
.19±.13 .12±.02
.18±.03 .36±.20
.22±.12
June 18
S-II S-IV S-V
.15±.06
.13 .19±.00
.22

July 30
.2U.01
.09±.02
.18±.09

August 25
.18±.04
.17±.03
.12






      54

-------
Phosphorus—
     For reasons cited in the Methods section, the most successful phosphorus
measurements were of total phosphorus made during part of 1975.  Analysis of
samples taken after August 13, 1975, was not completed before the end of the
project due to potential contamination of the ammonia and organic nitrogen
measurements that would be caused by use of the total phosphorus digestion
agent, ammonium persulfate, in the laboratory.  The total phosphorus data is
illustrated in Figure 14.
     The seasonal cycle of total phosphorus is undramatic and shows little
change except for shifts in the depth of the peak concentration.  It would
be unexpected that the total phosphorus would exhibit a seasonal change in
terms of average concentration in a well oxygenated lake with a minimum
number of point and nonpoint nutrient inputs.  The features of the seasonal
cycle are similar to those reported by Stewart and Markello (1974) which
also exhibit a fairly constant average with peak concentrations found at
discrete depths.
     Total nitrogen and total phosphorus, being collective parameters,
clearly indicate the comparative nutrient status of the lake.  The concen-
tration of individual species of nutrients, especially dissolved inorganic
forms, depend largely on relative rates of biological uptake and release
whereas total forms indicate the active pool of nutrients in the water
column.  These parameters are also more frequently reported in the literature
and may be more reliable analytically for the class of oligotrophic lakes
where analysis problems are frequent at levels commonly close to the detection
limit.
     To illustrate the relative status of Harding Lake, Table 8 has been
compiled to tabulate some of the nutrient values for oligotrophic lakes.
     In general, the total nutrient status of Harding is in the range of
other lakes identified as oligotrophic.  The upper limits of these ranges
appear high in some cases but relatively high peaks commonly occur in the
nutrient profiles.  It is known that plankton tend to stratify at discrete
depths (Baker and Brook, 1971) and sampling such strata would tend to give
high total nutrient values.  The peak total phosphorus values in Harding  lie

                                        55

-------
   0
         TOTAL P, jug/I
                                  Surface^
   10
w  15
0)
CD
E

of
H
0.
UJ  20
   25
   30
*- I
         FEB.
                                       I
                               JUN.         AUG.
               APR.

                  1975

              FIGURE  14

TOTAL PHOSPHORUS ISOPLETHS. HARDING LAKE
                           56

-------
during summer at depths in the range of 15-20 m, the same depth range at
which the peak photosynthetic pigment concentrations lie, indicating
phytoplankton stratification at those depths.

              TABLE 8.  NUTRIENT VALUES FOR OLIGOTROPHIC LAKES

Lake
Mowich
Nordford
Vorderer
Finstertaler
Tahoe
Superior
Char
Harding
Total P(yg/L)
2-4
5
See 1-14
2-20
8-15
8
6-20
Total N(pg/L)
15-135
0-180
40-270
100-150


70-300
Source
Larson, 1973
Str0m, 1932
Pechlaner, 1966
Lake Tahoe Area Council,
1971
Gruending & Malanchuk, 1974
Schindler, et aZ.3 1974

BIOLOGICAL LIMNOLOGY
Algae
Autotrophic Primary Production--
     Actual counts of the plankton, with emphasis on the algae present in the
water column, were only conducted once, for samples of September 28, 1974,
at Deep Station  I.  The results of these counts are presented in Table 9 and
Figure 15.  Other observations were occasionally made concerning the algal
composition and  Table 10 contains a list of all algae identified to April
1975.
     During the  three years of this project, algal growth dynamics were
studied in two major ways.  Chlorophyll a measurements, which have often
been used to estimate biomass and to evaluate  growth were taken; and, algal
primary production was assessed using a method of measuring the uptake of
radioactive 14C-labeled bicarbonate (Steemann-Nielsen, 1952).
                                      57

-------
              TABLE  9.   PLANKTON  COUNTS  (CELLS/LITER)  HARDING  LAKE.   SEPTEMBER  28,  1974.   DEEP STATION I
                             	Depth in  meters  of  sample	
           Species              2         4         6         8         10       16        20       24       30
      Asterionella foimosa   8  xlO2   2   xlO3  3  xlO3   2   xlO3   4   xlO2   9   xlO3   5  xlO3  2  xlO3  1  xlO4
      Cocaoneis  sp.                                              4   xlO
      Cyclotella sp.         3   xlO3   8   xlO2   2   xlO3            4   xlO3   2   xlO3   2  xlO3  3  xlO3  5  xlO3
      Cymbella sp.           8   xlO2                                                                  8  xlO
                                                                                         2
      Di-atoma elongatum                                                            8  xlO
      MeZos-ira italica                                                    9   xlO3   8  xlO3  1.5x10   1.8x10
      N-itzsehia  sp.                                                       8   xlO   2  xlO3
01     Synedra nana                    8   xlO2                                                3  xlO3  2  xlO3
    Chlorophyceae
      Ankistrodesmus               ?         •?         •?         -5         -3
       setigerus             2   xlO^   5   xlOJ   2   x!0J   6   xlO^   2   xlOJ
      Cosmari-TMn                                                                                   _
       sub-tian-id-iwri                                                                          8  xl 0
      Crueigenia                            2
       teticaped-ia                     8   xlO
                                                     2
      Staurastrum eurvatum                     8   xlO
    Chrysophyceae
      Diceras phaesolus      2   xlO3   8   xlO2   3   xlO3   2   xlO3   2   xlO3
                                            2                  3
      D-inobryon  borge-i                8   xlO            2   xlO
      D. crennulatum        2  xlO3  6   xlO3   6   xlO3   6   xlO3  4  xlO3
                                                                                               (continued)

-------
                                              TABLE  9  (continued)

Depth in meters of sample
Species
D. cvennulatum,
"loricas
D. soo-iale
D. soeiale, loricas
Dinobryon sp.
unidentified
2468
4.0xl04 5.4xl04 3.4xl04 B.OxlO4

8 xlO2
8 xlO2
10
2.8xl04
4 xlO2
3 xlO3

16 20 24 30
4 xlO3 8 xlO2
2 xlO2
3 xlO3 8 xlO2 2 xlO3

  Dinobryon sp.  uniden-                                                             ,
   tified, loricas                                                            4  xlO
  Mallomonas globosa    4  xlO3           8  xlO2   2   xlO3   4  xlO3
Ciliates
  unidentified          4  xlO3  5  xlO3           8   xlO2   3  xlO3  2  xlO3  6  xlO3  7  xlO3  2  xlO3
Cladocera
                                       2
  Daphnia sp.                    8  XlO
Cryptophyceae
  Cryptomonaa sp.       2  xlO3  2  xlO3  2  xlO3   8   xlO2   8  xlO2  8  xlO2  8  xlO2  2  xlO3
                                                                  3
  C.  marssonii                                              2  xlO
  Rhodomanar, minuta     3.3xl04  4.6xl04  6.2xl04   4.1xl04   1.9xl04  3.0xl04  3.1xl04  3.6xl04  2.0xl04
Cyanophyceae
  Oscillatoria bormeti                                                        2  xlO   3  xlO3  l.lxlO4
Dinophyceae
  unidentified                                              4  xlO2

                                                                                         (continued)

-------
                                                   TABLE  9  (continued)
            Species
                                                         Depth  in meters of sample
                                                               10
12
20
24
30
en
o
Flagellates
  unidentified
Protozoa
  Di-dini-wn sp.
  unidentified
Rotatoria
  Kellioottia
   long-isp-ina lorica
  Kevatella sp.
  Polyavtha major
                             2.3xl04   9   xlO3   2.2xl04   1.4xl04   1.6xl04  3.8xl04   1.7xl04   2.7xl04   l.SxlO4

                                               2   xlO3   4  xlO3   2  xlO3  7  xlO3   5  xlO3   5   xlO3   8   xlO2
                                               2   xlO3
                                                                4  xlO2  8  xlO2
                  xlO2  8  xlO2

-------
   5o
   48
 o>
 O
"b 40
 c/
 O
 O
    32
   24
 CD
 <  16


     8
     O1-
          2m
4m
                             n
       m
6m
                     HARDING  LAKE .Station DEEP I-Sept.  1974

                             & Bacillariophyceae
                             H3 Chrysophyceae
                             ED Cryptophyceae
                             S3 Chlorophyceae
                             C3 Cyanophyceae
                             D Unidentified flagellates and ciliates
                                    F


fy
•4-'
•'1%;
$
I'1
*fc.
$••*
llr'

r~r
/ X1
•/'
^
^
:^
/ /
^
TT

:
;
.
:






w






                                                                                       'ri
8m      10m      !6m
 SAMPLE   DEPTH
20m
24m
30m
                                        FIGURE  15
              ALGAL  COUNT.  SEPTEMBER 28,1974.  HARDING  LAKE

-------
                TABLE 10.   ALGAE IDENTIFIED FROM HARDING LAKE
Bacillariophyceae
  Asterionella formosa
  Cocconeis sp.
  Cyclotella sp.
  Cymbella sp.
  Diatoma elongatum
  Melosira italioa
  Nitzschia sp.
  Synedra nana
Charophyceae
  Chara Sp.
Chlorophyceae
  Anikistrodesmus setlgevus
  Cosmarium subtimidiwn
  Crucigenia tetrapedia
  Staurastrum curvatwn
Chrysophyceae
  Diceras phaseolus
  DlnobTyan sp.
  D.  borgei
  D.  orenulatwn
  D.  soci-ale
  Mallomonas globosa
Cryptophyceae
  Cryptomonoas S p.
  C.  marssonii
  Rhodomonas minuta
Cyanophyceae
  Anabaena sp.
  Coccochloris sp.
  Desmonema sp.
  Gloeotrichia sp.
  Nost-oc sp.
  Scytonema sp.
  Osdilatori-a bornet'L
Dinophyceae
  Cerat-ium sp.
     The results of the chlorophyll a measurements during the last year of
the project are presented in Figure 16 and other data are contained in
Tables A-2 and A-3 of the Appendix.  Early in the project difficulties were
encountered with chlorophyll a measurement.  These difficulties were elimi-
nated by increasing the amount of water filtered to nearly two liters and
utilizing a low-volume 4-cm spectrophotometric cell, and the first reliable
data were obtained on August 6, 1973.  Routine measurement of phaeopigments,
the breakdown products of chlorophyll, began on August 10, 1974.  Before
that date, some chlorophyll measurements are falsely high due to the measure-
ment of phaeopigments as true chlorophyll.  It appears that phaeopigments
found here are only significant relative to chlorophyll a when snow-covered
ice is present and light is reduced to very low levels throughout the water
                                      62

-------
                                               DEEP I

                                   PIGMENT CONCENTRATION, mg/m3
en
co
      0
       10/6/74
       0    2
      10
      15
    O)

     .20
    I
    H
    Q_
    LLJ oc
    s^ tO
      30
      35
                L
12/6/74   12/7/74   1/15/75   2/21/75   3/21/75   4/11/75   5/3/75    5/8/75
0202020202020202
                                 \
5/20/75
0   2
  "1  1  I
             CHLOROPHYLL a
             PHAEOPHYTIN
                                             FIGURE  16

                            ALGAL PIGMENT CONCENTRATION, HARDING LAKE

-------
                                                DEEP I
                                    PIGMENT CONCENTRATION, mg/m3
CTl
-p.
         5/29/75
         0    2
        10

0)


X
I-
Q.
y 25
       30
       35 L
               6/9/75
               0   2
                       n  I  r
6/19/75
0   2
                            I   I I
7/16/75
0   2
                                            1  I  I
7/30/75
0   2
                                                        n  i  i  i
8/14/75
0   2
8/26/75
0   2
                                                I  1   I
10/13/75 11/14/75
0      0
                                                                                         -
               CHLOROPHYLL a
               PHAEOPHYTIN
                                      FIGURE 16 (CONTINUED)
                             ALGAL  PIGMENT CONCENTRATION, HARDING LAKE

-------
column. Unfortunately, the large size of the finned sea cell of the sub-
marine photometer available to this project did not allow measurement of
light extinction under the ice seal so we were unable to quantify this
inverse relationship between light and phaeopigment concentration.
     Figures 17 and 18 present the results of the light and dark bottle
experiments utilizing NaH*C03 to measure carbon fixation by the algae.  The
experiment was routinely run only to 30 m, considerably below the 1% light
level during strong summer sunlight (See Figure 10), but this is seen to be
somewhat inadequate for certain dates when measurable fixation was still
occurring at 30 m.
     Table 11 presents the results of integration over depth of the chloro-
phyll a, carbon fixation measurements, and light radiation received at the
surface.  The data of January 15, February 21, and November 14, 1975, are
questionable because the Sign Rank test showed no significant difference
between the mean distribution of the light and dark bottles for these dates.
March 21, 1976, data are also not considered accurate as the light and dark
bottles were incubated in an incorrect sequence relative to the depths at
which the water was taken.
     No relationship was  found  between  these measurements.  Attempts were
 also made  to  relate chlorophyll a  concentration and fixed carbon (mg/m ) at
 each depth, on  each day when  both  were  measured, and no pattern was found.
      Figure  19  presents  a  means  of  estimating  the annual primary production
 assignable to the  planktonic  algae.   This  figure shows that estimates from
 our data for 1974  and  1975 are significantly different, at least between
 June  20 and  September  28.   This  difference most probably occurs because of
 difficulties with  the  quality of the  purchased radioactive tracer.  All
 experiments  up  to  that of  June 19,  1975,  (and  additionally, those of
 October 14 and  November  14,  1975) were  run with a batch of tracer of good
                                                          6            4
 quality and  the calibration  value is  acceptable, 6.68 X 10  + 4.71 X 10
 cpm/ml.  All other experiments were run using  a different batch of higher
 variability  3.73 X 106 ± 1.40 X  105 cpm/ml.  The above calibrations are
 specific to  our standards  and counting  situation, but the fact that this
 batch  is highly variable has  been verified by  others using this batch
                                      65

-------
                           CARBON FIXED,mg/m3/doy
    5/7/74   6/20/74   7/2/74
0	20
 Y////Y////V,
         0   20
                          20
Q>

-------
                       CARBON FIXED, mg/m3/day
  5/20/75
  0  20  40  60
28 -
    12:30-
    14 = 00
        5/28/75
        0   20  40
          16:50-
          16:50
6/10/75
0   20   40
  16:10-
  16:10
                       6/18/75
                       0   20  40
                         10:05
                         10:05
     6/25/75
     0  20  40
  7/16/75
  0  20
28 -
    20=20-
    20:20
7/30/75
0   20
8/13/75       8/25/75
0   20  40    0   20
             11 = 15-
             11=15
     19=15-
     19:27
              9/12/75
              0   20
                          07:26-
                          07M5
10/14/75  11/14/75
0   20   0  10
  15=28-
  15:50
20=30-
16:30
                       FIGURE 17  (CONTINUED)
ALGAL PRIMARY PRODUCTION. STATION  DEEP I, HARDING LAKE, ALASKA.
ICE THICKNESS AND SECCHI DEPTH INDICATED. INNER LINES FOR MAY 20
AND 28,  1975  INDICATE VALUES CORRECTED  FOR  LAKE  MORPHOMETRY.
                                 67

-------
          CARBON FIXED, mg/m3/day
             STATION-SHALLOW I
6
oc
5
10
d
0
5
in
/20/74 7/2/74 7/16/74 7/31/74 8/27/74 9/28/74 5/28/75
?0 0 20 0 20 0 20 0 20 0 20 0 20
1 1 1
\
-
5/19/75 7
5 20 C
1 1
-
1 1
-
! 1 1
\
-
III III I i 1 .
L- —
/16/75 7/30/75 8/26/75 10/14/75
20 0 20 0 20 0 20
\' ' '
1. 	 1 1
1 1 1
i i
            STATION-SHALLOW m

             6/20/74       7/16/74
            ^0   20       0   20
                          ~
            10 L
             STATION- SHALLOW BT
6/20/74 7/2/74 7/16/74 7/31/74 5/28/75
^0 20 0 20 0 20 0 20 40 60 80 0 20 40


5
n
1 |
/

I \
/

1 I
1 \

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I


ll.ll
I \

             FIGURE  18

ALGAL PRIMARY PRODUCTION, HARDING LAKE
                  68

-------
         CARBON FIXED, mg/m3/doy
           STATION-SHALLOW Y
8/15/74 8/27/74 9/14/74 9/28/74 6/19/75
^0 20 40 60 0 20 0 20 0 20 0 20
0

5
10
1 1 1 1 1 1

"
-
1 1 1
_ /

-
1 |
1

-
1 1 1 I
/ \
"
-
7/16/75 7/31/75 8/26/75 10/14/75
0 20 40 0 20 0 20 0 20


5
in
i l 1 1


1 I 1


)l


l I 1
>

         FIGURE 18  (CONTINUED)
ALGAL PRIMARY PRODUCTION, HARDING LAKE

                  69

-------
       TABLE 11.  INTEGRAL VALUES OF ALGAL GROWTH PARAMETERS AND
                INCIDENT RADIATION.  HARDING LAKE.  DEEP STATION I
Date

8/06/73
8/27/73
10/18/73
12/04/73
3/14/74
4/06/74
5/07/74
6/20/74
7/02/74
7/16/74
7/31/74
8/15/74
8/27/74
9/14/74
9/28/74*
10/06/74
12/03/74
1/05/75
2/21/75
3/21/75
4/11/75
5/02/75
5/08/75
5/20/75
5/28/75
6/10/75
6/18/75
6/25/75
7/16/75
7/30/75
8/13/75
8/25/75
9/12/75
10/14/75
11/14/75


8.
7.
3.
15.
14.
20.









8.
2.
2.
6.
13.
12.
21.
31.
44.
45.
50.
47.

63.
53.
41.
44.

30.
3.


7
8
9
0
3
7









5
4
4
5
4
9
4
6
6
4
0
6

6
6
9
0

3
1
Chlorophyll a
2
(mg/m )

(to
(to
(to
(to
(to
(to









(to
(to
(to
(to


(5/5/75)
(to
(to
(5/29/75)(to
(6/09/75)(to
(to

(to
(to
(8/14/75)(to
(8/26/75) (to

(to
(to
C-14 production
2
(mg/m /day)

10m)
10m)
4m)
30m)
35m)
35m)









15m)
30m)
12m)
30m)



20m)
20m)
25m)
30m)
30m)

30m)
30m)
30m)
30m)

30m)
4m)







118
98
94
156
154
138
124
141
88


1
10
7
11
118
188
401
447
194
398
297
232
215
309
325
128
203
1







.8
.0
.4
.8
.8
.0
.4
.6
.8


.0
.0
.6
.3
.9
.7
.9
.2
.3
.1
.2
.0
.2
.6
.1
.3
.8
.8
radiation
2
(gm-cal/cm /day)










618.



273.
316.





385.
473.
377.
564.

301.
408.

566.
371.
419.
203.













6



0
5





9
6
1
8

7
7

6
9
2
5



*A11 chlorophyll a measurements prior to this date were calculated by the
Strickland and Parsons formula, after this date by the IBP formula.
                                     70

-------
   500i~
CVJ
 E
 \
 o>
 E

 Q
 UJ
 X
O
03
o
   400
300
   200
   100
        JAN.
            FEB.
MAR.
APR.
MAY
JUN.
JUL.    AUG.  ' SEPT.  '  OCT.  '  NOV. '  DEC.
                                    FIGURE  19

             ANNUAL ALGAL PRIMARY PRODUCTION.  HARDING  LAKE

-------
(Williams, S., 1976 personal communication; Alexander, V., 1976, personal
communication).  This latter batch contained two populations of unknown size
of different specific activities one of which is approximately double the
other.  Because ampules for standard preparation were not drawn at random
from the entire batch, there is no way to assign ampules used to anything
more accurate than a value somewhere between the two specific activities
according to the particular ampules drawn for standard preparation by each
user.  This  problem was not found before much work had been accomplished by
all groups and individuals using this batch of tracer due to the stockpiling
of sample filters, which was necessitated by the remote location of field
sites.
     Figure  19 indicates that the activity estimated by our standards for the
second batch is probably too low, allowing overestimation of productivity and
production.  Note the closeness in daily fixation on May 7, 1974, and two
dates in early May, 1975, when the same, more reliable first batch of tracer
was being used.  In any case, our estimate of annual production, at 47.8 gm
   2
C/m /year is most undoubtedly high due also to the fact that the daily pro-
ductivity was not corrected for lake morphometry.  Some estimate of the
effect of these corrections can be made by reference to Figure 17 where
productivity at all depth at Deep Station I for May 20, 1975, is plotted both
corrected and uncorrected for the amount of lake surface area underlain by
water of the depth of the measurement.
     On the whole, there was no significant added variance component between
shallow stations as compared to within the stations when Bartlet's test for
homogeneity of variance and a Model II one-way analysis of variance was
performed on the shallow-station data.  Thus it is valid to compare any one
shallow station to the comparable section of the Deep Station I   In a com-
parison of this type, the first 4 m of the data for May 28, 1975, at Deep
Station I is plotted both corrected and uncorrected for lake morphometry in
Figure 17, and the corrected inner line can be compared to that representing
production measured at Shallow Stations I or IV (Figure 18) on that date.
The areal production obtained by integration of the inner corrected line is
not significantly different from that of either of the shallow stations.  Nor
is it significantly different from that of the uncorrected line for the first

                                      72

-------
4 m of Deep Station I.  Thus, with few exceptions, littoral area production
is adequately represented by the measurements in the upper 4 m of Deep
Station I.  It can be noticed from Figures 17 and 18 that the shallow stations
were often run a day later or earlier than the deep station, and variations
due to weather changes show effect.  These variations however, are not large
enough to warrant further consideration in estimating annual algal production.
The two high values near the bottom of Shallow Station IV on July 31, 1974,
and at Shallow Station V on August 15, 1974, may be artifacts due to copre-
cipitation of the bicarbonate with oxidizing iron, since deposits of red iron
precipitates have been noted in the littoral of this lake, or it may be a
true effect of optimum light as these are both gravel-bottomed stations, or
the effect may be of optimum local nutrient availability.
     Comparison of the algal primary productivity and production of Harding
Lake to other well-studied lakes is informative (Table 12).  Unfortunately,
the best-studied high-latitude lakes are found in the arctic and may not be
strictly comparable to subarctic Harding Lake.

        TABLE 12.  ANNUAL ALGAL PRIMARY PRODUCTION.  HIGH-LATITUDE LAKES

Lake and

Char Lake


Latitude

72°42'N


Meretta 72°42'N


Schrader

Peters 69


69°22'N

°19'N
Harding 64°25'N
Annual

1969
1970
1971
1969
1970
1971
1959
1961
1969
1975
2
gm C/m

5.8
6.3
7.2
31.2
16.5
31.7
7.5
6.5
0.9
47.8



(Kalff and
1971)

(Kalff and
1971)

(Hobbie, 1
(Hobbie, 1




Holmgren,


Holmgren,


964)
964)

                                      73

-------
     It should be noted that Peters and Schrader Lakes are both somewhat
turbid due to glacial water sources, and that Char Lake is ice covered
except for a very short period in late summer, at times remaining ice covered
throughout some years.  Therefore, the growth of the planktonic algae of
these lakes would be expected to be somewhat light limited.  Merretta Lake
receives sewage from the village of Resolute and is thought to be more
productive than nearby Char Lake because of the increased nutrient loading.
     Considering Rodhe's (1965) index which considers the shape of the daily
productivity curve as well as its integral as summer averages, Harding Lake
can  be compared to other clear, deep, oligotrophic lakes  (Table 13).  Rodhe's
index is the quotient of a    (maximum production in mg C/m /day) divided by
          «               fflaX
za  (mg C/m /day).

              TABLE  13.  RODHE'S INDEX.  SELECTED OLIGOTROPHIC LAKES

Lake
Byglandsfjorden ^59°N
Char 72°42'N
Tahoe 39°09'N
Harding 64°25'N
a
max
za
0.14
0.12
0.002
0.11
Reference
Lande (1973)
Kalff and Welch
Goldman (1974)



(1974)



      The  peculiarities of the algal productivity of Lake Tahoe  illustrated
 here  are  due to the extreme depths at which algal growth occurs as compared
 to  the  low maximum production at each particular depth.  From the above
 figures it can be seen that algal primary productivity values would help to
 classify  Harding Lake as oligotrophic.  Reports of visable algal blooms on
 this  lake have been attributed by our field crew to probably stem from high
 amounts of floating tree pollen occurring each spring.
     The  light regime peculiar to the latitude at which this lake is located
 presents a different setting than that of temperate lakes (Johnson and
 Hartman, 1969).  This latitude enjoys more sunlight and twilight as a percent
 of the time in a year:  about 62% as compared to 56% for 50°N latitude in the
middle of the conterminous states.  Proportionally more of the total  year's
                                     74

-------
sunlight is experienced here in summer and less in winter.  Indeed, from late
May to late July, continuous sunlight and twilight occur and no darkness is
experienced. Thus the question arises as to whether this extended summer
sunlight and reduced winter sunlight influences algal primary production.
     The need to conduct carbon-14 algal primary production experiments for
24 hours, because of the low productivity expected in northern waters, is
documented  (Hobbie, 1964).  It has been noted by marine researchers that 24-
hour incubations tend to underestimate productivity in comparison to shorter
experiments that are summed.  This has been attributed to respiration losses
of previously fixed labeled carbon during the night period of darkness
(Eppley and Sharp, 1975).  Due to our particular work regime, coupled with
our need to travel 89.6 km (56 miles) to reach the lake, the great majority
of our experiments, Figures 17 and 18, were begun late in the day and thus
the dark respiration in the light bottles did not involve previously labeled
fixed material, but instead, the experiments were usually terminated fol-
lowing the  height of the light period.
     Diurnal experiments were conducted on June 25-26, 1975, and again on
September 12-13, 1975, to assess the 24-hour incubation period by comparing
it to the sum of four 6-hour periods.  On June 25-26, close to the summer
solstice, the lake basin enjoys approximately 21.5 hours of sunlight and 2.5
hours of civil twilight, and no period of darkness.  In late September, near
the autumnal equinox, the daylight lasts 12.5 hours and twilight lengthens
the light period to a total of slightly more than 14 hours.
     The results of these experiments are shown in Figures 20 and 21 and
Table 14.   While this type of experiment would have to be repeated many times
to yield results that could be statistically analyzed, and error separated,
many interesting results are noted.  In June while the pyrheliometer measured
early-morning incident radiation almost half that of the evening, fixation
was almost  immeasurable for the early morning period, A, while that of the
evening, D, was sizable.  The midday depression of photosynthesis noted in
comparing periods A and B of approximately equal light intensity is commonly
found in experiments of this type (Wetzel, 1975).  It can also be noted that
in September the sum of the four 6-hour incubations gives approximately the
                                     75

-------
CTl
          Q.
          UJ
          Q
             Oi—
                16
10
            12
             14
 24
32  0
22:30
  6/25/75-
22:30
  6/26/75
                   TOTAL
 CARBON  FIXED, mg/m3/time interval
8     16   0     8     16   0      8      16  0
                                                                                            16
                                      T
                        1
         22:30
            6/25/75-
           4:30
            6/26/75
               A
                           \
                                                    4:30-10:30
                                                     6/26/75
                        B
                            10:30-16:30
                           -   6/26/75
                             c
16:30-22:30
  6/26/75
D
                                               FIGURE 20
                   DIURNAL PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY. HARDING LAKE. DEEP STATION I. JUNE 25-26/75

-------
to
n£
h-
Q_
Lul
Q
                           0
    CARBON  FIXED, mg/m3/time interval
        16   0     8      16  0      8
                          16  0
                          16
        7:15
           9/12/75-
        7:15
           9/13/75
        TOTAL
                                         I
7:15-13:15
 9/12/75
                                  T
13:15-19:15
 9/12/75
                                             1
               B
19:15
   9/12/75-
 1:15
   9/13/75
                c
1:15-7:15
   9/13/75
                D
                                        FIGURE  21

     DIURNAL  PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY.  HARDING  LAKE. DEEP STATION I. SEPT. 12-13, 1975

-------
 same  fixation as  the  24-hour  incubation, while  in Oune  the  24-hour  fixation
 seems to  be an  underestimate.

    TABLE  14.  TIME-OF-DAY  EFFECTS ON CARBQN-14  EXPERIMENTS.   HARDING  LAKE.
                                June 25-26,  1975
                               Integral  Production       Incident  Radiation
                                  2                            2
      Time Period*             mg/m /time interval     gm-cal/cm /time  interval
22:30 -
22:30 -
4:30 -
10:30 -
16:30 -

7:15 -
7:15 -
13:15 -
19:15 -
1:15 -
22:30 (24 hours)
4:30 (6 hours)
10:30 (6 hours)
16:30 (6 hours)
22:30 (6 hours)

7:15 (24 hours)
13:15 (6 hours)
19:15 (6 hours)
1:15 (6 hours)
7:16 (6 hours)
72.8
0.7
43.4
42.6
23.8
September 12-13, 1975
113.6
66.0
18.5
19.6
6.8
580.5
43.8
171.9
266.6
98.2

283.4
98.2
86.0
54.5**
43.9**

  * All  times  noted  are Alaska Standard Time
 ** Moisture condensed on dome of pyrheliometer
 Heterotrophic Algal  Production--
      Measurements of heterotrophic algal production were attempted  twice
 during  this study.   Rodhe  (1955) has speculated on the  possibility  of  higher
 relative  importance  of heterotrophic compared to autotrophic  algal  production
 during  winter in lentic aquatic ecosystems at high latitudes  when sunlight is
 very  reduced.
      The first attempt of  February 21, 1975, was not successful.  Radioactive
 carbon  labeled galactose was the only substrate tested  on natural populations
 sampled at 20 m and  incubated for 6 hours.  Fixation of the radiocarbon was
 so slight as to be insignificantly higher than background.  The second experi-
ment followed the work of Maeda and Ichimura (1973) and the substrates pre-
sented were glucose and acetate.  It is assumed, in this type of experiment,

                                     78

-------
that heterotrophic bacteria are the main glucose-fixing organisms, while
acetate fixation can also be carried out by small flaggelated green algae as
a dark reaction.  To separate out the algal fixation, streptomycin, at 3
mg/1, is added to kill the bacteria that might also find the acetate an
acceptable substrate.
     While this technique can be questioned because of several inherent
weaknesses, some information was gained.  Regarding Figure 22, it is seen
that streptomycin was only slightly more effective in depressing the fixation
of glucose (to 73% at the highest concentration) than the fixation of acetate
(to 87%).  This could be attributed to a weakness of the technique as
explained by the fact that the activity of streptomycin is somewhat specific
to gram-negative rod-shaped bacteria.  The use of a broad-spectrum antibiotic
that does not affect algal cells or an algastat that does not affect bacteria
would improve the technique.  In this particular experiment glucose fixation
was not significantly reduced by the added bactericide most probably because
the amount of glucose added was inadvertently large enough to promote algal
fixation.  The work of Wright and Hobbie (1965) has shown that heterotrophic
primary production likely is carried out under two separate mechanisms.  With
low concentrations of simple organic substrates, bacteria are able to utilize
them for growth by an active transport process explainable by Michaelis -
Menten kinetics equations.  When higher concentrations of substrates are
available, the algae probably become able to utilize them through a passive
transport process, wherein the substrate diffuses through the cell wall when
the surrounding concentration becomes higher than the internal concentration.
     Thus, our experimentation, while not being intensive enough to allow
calculation of uptake velocities or upper limits of in-lake concentrations of
simple organic substances, has shown that heterotrophic primary production by
algae as well as bacteria may be an important wintertime activity in Harding
Lake.
Management Implications of the Algal Studies--
     The relationship between lakeside development and degradation of lake
water quality has been recognized for some time and the phenomenon has been
termed "cultural eutrophication."  This recognition has generated public
                                     79

-------
oo
o
         7.0r-
         6.0-
         5.0
C\J
\

E
10
CM
      E  4.0
      Q.
      O
o
 r
Z
O


X



UJ
   3.0
         2.0
         i.o
          0
              •	  ACETATE

              •	  ACETATE,with streptomycin

              A	ACETATE.with Lugol's iodine

              o	  GLUCOSE

              n	  GLUCOSE, with streptomycin

              &	GLUCOSE, with Lugol's iodine
                                                                      ...•••'a
                                                                                             .3.5
                                                                                             3.0
                                             2.5
               A—A	
           0
0.04     0.08
                              0.12
                                       0.16
0.2
0.24
0.28
                                                                          0.32
                              SUBSTRATE  CONCENTRATION, acetate- mg/l X I02,  glucose-mg/l


                                                 FIGURE 22
                          HETEROTROPHIC PRODUCTION. HARDING LAKE. NOV. 14/75
                                                                                                   2.0
                                                 E
                                                 LO
                                                 C\J
                                                 \
                                                 E
                                                 CL
                                                 o
                                                10
                                                 O
                                                                                              1.5
                                                                                                 X
                                                                                              1.0  F7
                                                                                             0.5
                                                                                                       co
                                                                                                       o
                                                                                                       o
          0
0.36     0.4

-------
concern that lakes be protected from development that would prove to have a
detrimental effect on water quality.  Predicting the allowable level of
development for a particular lake, however, has proved difficult.
     The most visible evidence of water quality degradation consists of
nuisance growths of algae with a resulting decrease in water clarity.
Limnologists have recently developed empirical models based on the relation-
ship between the phosphorus input and the resultant algal growth (Vollen-
weider, 1969b, 1971; Bachmann and Jones, 1974; Dillon and Rigler, 1975; Jones
and Bachmann, 1976; and Schindler, 1977).
     Dillon and Rigler  (1975) have applied their model to determining the
extent to which development of recreational dwellings can be permitted while
still maintaining the peak level of summer algal biomass (as chlorophyll a)
below that selected by agencies managing a particular lake.  We will attempt
to utilize this model to assess the effects of future real estate development
on Harding Lake.  The phosphorus concentration is predicted using an equation
derived from Vollenweider's (1969b) model
where
     [P] = predicted total phosphorus concentration
      L  = loading
      z  = mean depth
      a  = sedimentation rate
      p  = flushing rate
     The limited amount of nutrient analyses performed on aspects other than
the water column at Harding Lake do not allow an accurate estimation of the
phosphorus loading to the lake.  Thus, the equation must be modified to
separate the known present total phosphorus concentration from that which
would be added by further cottage development.  The equation becomes
                         rpi =     -        rp -,
                         LFJ   z(a+l/R)    L oj
where
     [P] = predicted concentration of total phosphorus
      K  - annual total phosphorus output per cottage
                                      81

-------
       C   =  number  of  additional  cottage  units
       A   =  surface area  of  the  lake
       z   =  mean  depth
       a   =  sedimentation rate
       R   =  retention  time
      [P  ]=  present average  total  phosphorus  concentration
 For this study K is calculated  as 0.3  x  10   mg/cottage-year using the value
 of 0.8 kg/capita-year of Dillon and  Rigler  (1975),  and  the 0.3 capita-year/
 cottage-year obtained from  Larson's  (1974)  study  of cottage use at Harding
 Lake during 1973.   A  sedimentation rate  of  0.65 was chosen, and the retention
 time of the lake has  been estimated  as approximately 70 years from the water
 budget calculations.   The present average total phosphorus concentration is
 taken as 14 mg/m .
      Using  Equation 2, the  effects on  total  phosphorus  concentration of some
 future development possibilities at  Harding  Lake  were calculated.  Chlorophyll
 a values were then predicted  from these  total  phosphorus concentrations
 (Dillon  and Rigler, 1974).   Finally, water  clarity  as Secchi  depth values
 were predicted (Jones, J.,  and  Bachmann, R., 1977,  personal communication).
 These predictions  are presented in Table 15.
         TABLE  15:   PREDICTED  TOTAL  PHOSPHORUS  AND  RESULTANT CHLOROPHYLL a
                   CONCENTRATIONS  AND  SECCHI  DEPTHS FOR SELECTED
                     DEVELOPMENT POSSIBILITIES  AT HARDING LAKE

Development
1975
a cottage on
Additional
Cottage
Equivalents
0
130
Predicted
total P
o
(mg/m )
14.0
14.4
Predicted
Chlorophyll a
(mg/m3)
3.3
3.5
Predicted
Secchi depth
(m)
3.3
3.2
every parcel
all cottages
converted to
year-round
homes
1,119
22.2
6.5
2.2
                                      82

-------
     Application of these models to Harding Lake may be questionable.   With
the nitrogen-to-phosphorus ratio at roughly 10:1, phosphorus may not be the
limiting nutrient in Harding Lake as is assumed for these models.   In  addi-
tion, the fact that inorganic nitrogen forms are nearly undetectable during
the growing season provides evidence that the lake may be nitrogen limited,
in which case the models may lose their predictive ability.
     It can be noted that the predicted chlorophyll a concentration of 3.3
    3                                                           3
mg/m  for the measured total phosphorus concentration of 14  mg/m  of 1975 was
                                                            3
approximated by the values actually measured at about 2 mg/m  in early
spring 1975 (Figure 16).  During this under-ice chlorophyll  a peak, a  Secchi
depth of 5 m was measured (Figure 17) which is close to the  3.3 m  predicted.
     The fact that Harding Lake has its peak algal biomass and productivity
under the spring ice rather than in the summer may also make these models
inapplicable.  As pointed out above, however, these models seem to predict
adequately the peak chlorophyll a concentration and resultant Secchi depths.
The reduction in water clarity at peak algal biomass is not currently  noticed
by the general public because of the ice cover.  Perhaps the greatest  danger
in future development on Harding Lake would be that nutrient additions might
promote a shift in algal succession so that the peak growth  would  occur in
summer.  The resultant loss of water clarity (below the current summer Secchi
depth of approximately 11 m) could be very noticeable and undesirable.
Vascular Aquatic Plants
     A list of the submerged hydrophyte species found in Harding Lake  during
the summer of 1974 is presented in Table 16.  One macroalga (Chara sp.) and
one pteridophyte (isoetes muvicata var. Braunii) were found as well as a
variety of angiosperms.  Figure 23 presents a map of the plant beds and
locates the starting points of the transects samples.  Table 17 presents the
biomass estimates for the samples that represented 100% cover of a single
species.  The transect data is included in Appendix Table A-4.
     Using the transect percent cover data and the biomass estimates for 100%
cover for each species, the biomass produced above the sediments was esti-
mated for each of the major plant beds.  The bed containing transect #1,
               c •->
which is 2 x 10 m  in extent, produced approximately 6400 kg of plant tissue

                                     83

-------
        TABLE  16.   THE SUBMERSED HYDROPHYTE
        SPECIES OF  HARDING LAKE, ALASKA  1974
Chava  sp.

Isoetes murioata var.  Brauni-i

Spargani-um angust'lfoli-um

Potamogeton fili-form-is

Potamogeton Fre-isii

Potamogeton grcartineus

Potamogeton perfoliatus subsp. Richardsoni-i

Potamogeton praelongus

GlyoeT-ia boreal-is

Eleochar-is aei,au1ax"is

Ranunculus confervo-ides

Subulari-a aquat-ica

Myriophy11wn  s p.




Minor  species:

Potamogeton natans

Junous alp-inus

EteoGhajcis palustris

Polygonum amphi-bium
                       84

-------
                                                          SMALL COLONY OF Polygonum amphibium
co
un
                                   4m
                                    ISOLATED INDIVIDUALS OF
                                      Potamogeton filiformis	-
                                                SMALL COLONY OF
                                                Eleocharis oalustris
                                          SCATTERED COLONIES OF
                                          Chara sp., Potamogeton perfollatus
                                          SUBSP Richardson// AND
                                          P. praelongus
SMALL ZONE OF Eleocharis acicularls,
Subularia aquatica AND SHALLOW-WATER
FORMS OF Potamogeton perfoliatus SUBSP
Richardsonii AND P.gramineus
                                                                                         A  INDICATES TRANSECT STARTING
                                                                                             POINT
          AREAS  OF MAJOR SUBMERSED
          HYDROPHYTE COLONIZATION,
          CHARACTERIZED BY TRANSECT
          DATA SUMMARIES.
                                                                              5
                                                                                                       N
                                                                                                       0.5
                                                                                                       Km
                                                   FIGURE   23

                             PLANT  DISTRIBUTION  MAP.   HARDING  LAKE, 1975

-------
(at 31.7 ± 37.6 g/m2).  The bed which included transects #2-#6, which  has  an
              n r\
area of 3 x 10 m, produced approximately 6900 kg of plant tissue  (at  23.1  ±
30.6 g/m2).  Thus, over the entire lake surface, the vascular plant  produc-
tion equaled approximately 1.35 g/m  dry weight submerged hydrophytes  for  the
growing season of 1974.  This can be compared to the algal production  for
1975 estimated at 47.8 gm C/m2/year which can be converted to 95.6 g/m /year
dry weight algae  (Lind, 1974).  The relatively greater importance  of the
planktonic algal production in Harding Lake is demonstrated.  However  one
aspect of primary production remains unknown since no measurements of  benthic
algal production were conducted during this project.  In 1974 no benthic
algae were observed to be growing on the surfaces of the vascular  aquatic
lants.  During 1975, however, epiphytic growth appeared to be heavy.

                 TABLE 17-  PLANT BIOMASS ESTIMATES FOR SAMPLES
	REPRESENTING 100% COVER OF A SINGLE SPECIES, HARDING LAKE,  1974
                                                     2
          Species                                 g/m

Chara sp.                                    36.7 ± 19.0
Isoetes mux"iaata var. Braunii                56.9 ± 58.5
Potamogeton filiformis                       25.0
P. perfol-iatus subsp. Richardsoni-i,          121.0
  (shallow-water form <_ 15cm)
P. perfoliatus subsp. R-Lohardsoni-i           28.4 ± 14.8
  (deep-water form >_ 15cm)
P. praelongus                                91.5 ±  2.8
Clyeeria borealis                            92.6
Eleoohari-s ao'Loulax-'ls                       185   ±93
Myriophyllum sp.                             17.2 ±  6.9
     Work on the vascular plants of this  lake was also  conducted  during  the
summer of 1966 (LaPerriere and Robertson,  1973).  Unfortunately,  the  plant
beds were unmapped, thus it is not possible to calculate  the  annual production
for that year.
                                      86

-------
Zooplankton
     Very limited sampling of the zooplankton was conducted during this
project.  The major effort in this regard consisted of dry-weight measure-
ments presented in Figure 24.  The biomass present from season to season
throughout a year is seen to vary by roughly a factor of ten and is probably
concentrated in the upper 10 m of water.  Limited data for May and June of
1973, not plotted because of lack of sufficient replicates, helps to indicate
that the peak concentration is found in early August and the lowest concen-
tration is found in March.
     Counts of zooplankton taken with a large plexiglass trap near midnight
and noon on August 5, 1974, (Table 18) show as is usually found that the
zooplankton are distributed differently at different times of day.  Of
special note is the capture of Leptodova kintii at 10 m at night, a predator
known to be phototactic and nocturnal.
          TABLE 18.  ZOOPLANKTON COUNTS.  HARDING LAKE.  AUGUST 5, 1974

3
Individuals per m
Sample Time:
Sample Depth:
Bosmi-na ooTegni
CeTati-wn sp.
Daphn-ia long-irerms
Ho loped'lwn s p .
Kelliootti-a longispina
Keratella sp.
LeptodoTa 'k'indt'L-i
Polyphemus pediculus
copepods
nauplii
unknowns
0:00-2:00
2m
2.2xl03
B.lxlO4
2.8xl03
5.7xl02
1.4xl03
2.4xl02


1.2xl04
4.1xl02
2.4xl02
0:00-2:00
10m
3.3xl03
8.7xl04
3.8xl03
2.4xl02
2.6xl03
S.lxlO2
8.1x10
8.1x10
1.4xl04
3.2xl02
S.lxlO2
12:00-14:00
2m
2.1xl03
l.lxlO5
3.2xl02
2.4xl02
2.5xl03
1.6xl02


1.4xl03
3.2xl02
4.0xl03
12:00-14:00
10m
l.SxlO3
l.SxlO5
2.8xl03
8.1x10
2.5xl03
l.SxlO3

1.6xl02
3.9xl03
l.SxlO3
9.0xl03
                                      87

-------
CO
CO
       0
                                   20 meter haul
                                  — DEEP I, 1973-4
                                  — DEEP H,  -
                                      10 meter haul
                                    	SHALLOW IE, 1973-4
                                    	 SHALLOW I , 1975
          JULY
AUG.
SEPT. '  OCT.
NOV.
DEC
JAN.
FEB.  '  MAR. '  APR.  'MAY
                                 FIGURE 24
                  DRY WEIGHT OF ZOOPLANKTON CAPTURED. HARDING LAKE

-------
     Table 19 presents the zooplankters identified from Harding Lake during
this project.  An interesting phenomenon occurred several times when zoo-
plankters were noted in high concentrations crawling over the plexiglass
holders for the light and dark bottles of the algae experiments.  The
plankter involved was Sida cristallina.  It is especially interesting to note
that this occurred in deep water  (at Deep Station I) since Brooks (1959) has
reported "...they are never present in large numbers in the open water, nor
are they likely to be found far out from the weedy margin."

               TABLE 19.  ZOOPLANKTON  IDENTIFIED FROM HARDING LAKE
Cladocera
     Bosmina coregoni
     Daphnia longiremus
     Eupyoevous glacial-Is
     Holopedium gibber>um
     Leptodora kindtii
     Polyphemus pediculosis
     Sida crystalina
Copepoda
     Cyclops capitallatus
     Cyclops sp.
     Diaptomus pvibilofensis
     MoTaria mvazeki

Rotifera
     Kellicottia  longispina
     Kevatella cocJilearis
Fishes
     While this project did  not work with the fishes of the lake the follow-
ing information has  been  provided  us by  the Alaska Department of Fish and
Game.
     Fish species contained  in Harding Lake as of 11 February 1975:
     Native:
          Coregonus  sardinella (Valenciennes) least cisco
          Cottus cognatus (Richardson) slimy sculpin
          Esox lucius  (Linneaus) northern pike
          Lota lota  (Linneaus) burbot
     Successfully Introduced:
          Oncorhynchus kisutch (Walbaum) coho or silver salmon
          Salvelinus namaycush (Walbaum) lake trout
                                      89

-------
     Stocking and netting records are presented in Tables 20 and 21.  The
1939 stocking of rainbow trout was unsuccessful.  Recaptures of lake trout
indicate that a breeding population has not been established.
Benthic Macroinvertebrates
     Concurrent with the first two years of this project were two years of
work on Alaskan lake benthos (LaPerriere, 1975) that treated samples from
Harding Lake as well as other lakes in the state.  Samples were taken by
dredge the first summer and all organisms identified as far as possible
(Tables 22 and 23).  Sampling stations not identified in Figure 1 can be seen
in  Figure 25.  During the second summer samples were taken both by dredge and
by  hand (by a diver) and the chironomids were separated and reared  (Table
24).
     The emphasis of the benthos work was on chironomids (nonbiting midges
of  the order Diptera), which have been relied upon in Europe as good indi-
cators of the trophic state of lakes.  Unfortunately the necessary taxonomic
and ecological studies necessary to designate indicator chironomids in the
Nearctic are not nearly complete.  The first major paper on this subject has
just been published  (Saether, 1975) tabulating chironomid species and their
distribution across  the trophic spectrum.  Of the chironomids of Harding Lake
which have been identified to species, only one, Monodiamesa bathyphila
(Kieff.), appears in Saether1s tables.  He believes it to be restricted to
the oligotrophic situation in the Nearctic; however, it is also found in
mesotrophic lakes in the Palearctic.
Enteric Bacteria
     During the summer of 1973 (May-September) a thesis study was conducted
relative to the water quality and pollution control at Harding Lake (Larson,
1974).  This study,  in the form of a graduate student thesis, included an
evaluation of the lake water sanitary bacteriology in addition to a survey of
sanitary facilities  located at the lake.  The objectives of the study were to
characterize the shore land development at Harding Lake, to investigate the
water supply and solid waste and sewage disposal practices, and to determine
if  Harding Lake was being contaminated to an extent that might limit recrea-
tional activities.
                                     90

-------
                                TABLE 20.   FISH-STOCKING HISTORY.  HARDING LAKE

Date
Stocked
1939

1956-1965
1963
1965
December 1965
July 1967
July 1968
July 1969
July 1971
Species
RTi
LT*
RT
LT
LT
LT
LT
SS3
ss
SS
Total
Number
No good records
No good records
125,000
252 adult
235 adult
88,000 eyed eggs
(75,000 hatched)
31,200 fingerling
375,800 fingerling
338,500 fingerling
232,800 fingerling
Per Kg Per Hectare Source
Forest Service
Forest Service
ADF&G
ADF&G
ADF&G
ADF&G
ADF&G
ADF&G
ADF&G
640 217 ADF&G

    = rainbow trout, Salmo ga-irdnevi
2LT = lake trout, Salvelinus namaycush
3SS = silver salmon, Onehorhynchus kisuteh
(Information from Alaska Department of Fish and Game [ADF&G], 1974).

-------
                                    TABLE 21.   NETTING RECORDS.  HARDING LAKE
UD
ro

Date
Sep-Oct 1959**
Sep 1960

Jun 1961
Oct 7-8, 1962

1963
1964**

Sep 1, 1964

Oct 13, 1964

Sep 10, 1965

Oct 6, 1965


Sep 13, 1966



Species
NP1
LCi2
LT3
NP
NP
LCi
No test
NP
LCi
NP
LT
NP
LCi
NP
LCi
LT
NP
LCi
LT
NP
LCi
BB4
Fish
Netted
35
40
1
24
2
2
netting
4
6
10
5
4
6
6
5
3
2
70
6
16
23
2
Length
Range
* -965
* -305




done
490-750
185-290
356-813
478-767
498-838
188-295
254-617
191-218
559-597
506-597
127-279
432-635
318-615
185-216
480-559
(mm)
Mean
533
201
991






465
650
592
218
480
206
574
551
203
523
465
201
518
Net Age Percent
Hours Frequency Class Composition
566 .06
.07
.002
18.5 1.3
31 .06
.06



.08
.04
.08
.12
.06
.05
.03
.02
.73
.03
.08
.12
.01
                                                                                                 (continued)

-------
                                          TABLE 21 (continued)
•JO
CO

Date
1967
Sep 1968



Jun 5, 1969
Jun 6, 1969
Jun 26, 1969

Aug 1970**



Aug 13, 1971



Jun 8-21,1972



Sep 8, 1972


Species
No test
LT
NP
LCi
BB
NP
NP
NP
LCi
LT
NP
BB
LCi
SS5
LT
NP
LCi
BB
NP
LCi
LT
NP
LT
SS
Fish
Netted
netting
4
20
119
2
6
9
8
5
6
12
9
392
2
1
1
6
9
11
22
1
31
1
8
Length
Range
done
533-685



440-705
390-715
371-621
152-175
393-821
485-690
375-695
120-235
95-117
540
675
118-235
509-670
511-634
129-246
561
173-707
588
201-250
(mm)
Mean

633



562
530
480
164
691
591
462





580
584
157

541

228
Net Age Percent
Hours Frequency Class Composition

290 .014
.07
.41
.006
.13
.18
.07
.05
352 .02
.04
.03
1.11
24 .08
.04
.04
.25
.04
.05
.10
.01 V
.55
.02 V
.13 I
                                                                                                   (continued)"

-------
                                        TABLE 21  (continued)
Date
May 22- Aug 10, 1973




Aug 6-9,1974




Nov 22-Dec 6, 1974



Species
LT
NP
LCi
SS
BB
NP
LT
LCi
BB
SS
NP
LT
BB
SS
Fish
Netted
8
148
76
25
2
45
2
28
10
3
7
2
17
8
Length
Range
630-730
255-830

145-155
580-665
140-635
570-730
120-200
380-655
335-395
140-580
495-680
380-670
285-410
(mm) Net
Mean Hours
696.8 419.5
515.9

150
662.5
449.5 576
650
155.9
474
361.7
395.7 552
587.5
580.9
359.4
Age
Frequency Class
.02
.35
.18
.06
.005
.08
.003
.05
.02
.005
.01
.004
.03
.01
Percent
Composition
3
57
29
10
1
51
2
32
11
4
21
6
50
23
:NP - northern pike, Esox luoius
2LCi- least Cisco, Coregonus sardinella
3LT - lake trout, Salvelinus namayoush
4BB - burbot, Lota lota
5SS - silver salmon, Onoor'hyna'hus kisuteh
 indicates data not provided
**date unknown
(Information from Alaska Department of Fish and Game, 1974.)

-------
             TABLE  22.   BENTHIC  MACROINVERTEBRATES.   HARDING LAKE
               PROFUNDAL  AND  SUBLITTORAL  STATIONS.  JULY 24. 1973

Station Depth
DEEP STATION I
Sample 1 42 m

Sample 2 42 m

Sample 3 42 m


DEEP STATION II
Sample 1 20 m


Sample 2 20 m

Sample 3 20 m


SHALLOW STATION II
Sample 1 18 m

Sample 2 18m




Group

cl.1
w.2
c.3
cl.
c.
w.


c.
cl
w.
c.
w.
c.

w.

w.

c.


cl.
Organism
Identification

P-isi-dium sp.
Peloscolex sp.
Phaenopsectra sp.
Pisiditm sp.
Phaenopsectra sp.
Peloscolex sp.
unidentified tubificid

Phaenopsectra sp.
Pis-idiwn sp.
Peloscolex sp.
Phaenopsectra sp.
Peloscolex kurankov-i
Phaenopsectra sp.
Phaenopsectra sp.
Peloscolex kurankovi.

Peloscolex sp.
unidentified tubificid
Monodiamesa bathyph-il-ia
Procladius sp.
Protanypus sp.
Pis -id-turn sp.

Number

3
1
1
1
1 ecdysis
2


4
4
6
5
4
5
1 ecdysis
1

1
1
1 ecdysis
2
1
5
1cl.-clams,  2w.-worms, 3c.-chironomids
                                                            (continued)
                                     95

-------
                              TABLE 22 (continued)
                                             Organism
Station
Depth     Group
                                         Identification
                                       Number
Sample 3           18 m
SHALLOW STATION III
Sample 1           16m
 Sample 2
 Sample 3
 16 m
 16 m
cl.     Pisidiwn sp.                   3

c.     ChiTonorms sp. (pupa)          1
       Monodicmesa bathyphilia        3 ecdyses
       Phaenopseetra sp.              1
       Procladius sp.                 3
       Prooladius sp.                 2 ecdyses
       Protanypus sp.                 2
       Pvotanypus sp.                 3 ecdyses
       Stiotochivonomus rosensch'dldi  1 ecdysis
w.     Pelosoolex sp.                 1
C.     Protanypus                     2
c.     Monodicmesa bathyphilia        1 ecdysis
       Protanypus sp.                 2
       Protanypus sp.                 6 ecdyses
cl.    Pisidiwn sp.                   8
S.^    Lymnaea sp.                    1
w.     unidentified  tubificid          1
 SHALLOW  STATION  IV
 Sample 1            11 m
                              s.
                              w.
                  Monodicmesa bathyphilia
                  Monodicmesa bathyphilia
                  Procladius sp.
                  Protanypus sp.
                  Phaenopseotra  sp.
                  Lymnaea  sp.
                  Pelosoolex sp.
                                       1
                                       6  ecdyses
                                       1
                                       2  ecdyses
                                       1  ecdysis
                                       9
                                       1
   .-snails,,
                                                             (continued)
                                      96

-------
                              TABLE 22 (continued)

Station Depth
SHALLOW STATION IV
Sample 2 llm






Sample 3 llm




Group

c.

cl.
cd.5
m.6
s.
w.
c.
cl.
w.

Organism
Identification

Pvooladius sp.
Protanypus sp.
Pisidium sp.
unidentified calanoid
unidentified
Lymnaea s p .
Peloscolex sp.
Phaenopsectra sp.
Pi-s-id-ium sp.
Peloscolex sp.
unidentified tubificid

Number

3
1
2
4
1
5
1
1
1
3
1

5cd.-copepods, 6m.-mites
                                      97

-------
              TABLE  23.   BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES.  HARDING LAKE
                       LITTORAL STATIONS.  AUGUST  17, J973

ORGANISM
Depth
Station (m) Group
7 0.75 a.1
ce.2

cl.3
e.4
I.5
n.6
s.7

t.8


11
(Sample 1) 1.0 a.
c.9
cl.
1.
s.


n
(Sample 2) 1.0 a.
ne.10
s.
w.11
Identification
Eyalella azteca
Palpomyia sp.
unidentified adult
Pisidiim sp.
unidentified larva
Dina sp.
unidentified
Lymnaea
Gyrallus sp. (type 2)
unidentified Beraeidae
unidentified Limnephilidae
Mystaoides sp.
Eyalella azteoa
Cl-inotanypus sp.
Pis-idiwn sp.
Dina sp.
Lymnaea S p .
Gyrallus (type 1 )
Gyrallus (type 2)
Eyalella azteoa
unidentified
Gyrallus sp.
Pelosoolex sp.
Number
1
7
1
15
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
22
1
16
1
1
3
2
15
1
1
13
ia.-amphipods,  2ce.-ceratopogonids  (flies),  3cl.-clams,  4e.-empidids  (flies),

51.-leeches,  6n.-nematomorphs,  7s.-snails,  8t.-trichopterans,  9c.-chironomids
                                        \
(flies),  10ne.-nematodes,  nw.-worms
                                                            (continued)

                                    98

-------
                            TABLE  23  (continued)

ORGANISM
Depth
Station (m) Group Identification
16 6.0 c. Monodiamesa bathyphilia
Procladius sp.
Stempellina sp.
cl . Pisidium sp.
t. Mystaaldes sp.
W. Pelosoolex sp.
unidentified tubificid
18 1.0 a. Eyalella azteca
C. Denrichryptoah-ironomus sp.
Tony tar sus sp.
ce. unidentified
cl . Pis-idlum sp.
cd.12 unidentified
ta,13 Chryspos sp.
w. Pelosoolex sp.
unidentified tubificid
21 *1.5 a. Hyalella azteca
ce. Leptooonops (adult)
Palpomyia sp.
c. Dicrotendipes sp.
M-iorotendlpes sp.
Potthastia sp.
Procladius sp.
Parachironomus sp.
Stempellina sp.
Tony tarsus sp.
Number
1 ecdysis
3
1
5
1
15
3
7
1

1
15
1
1
5
10
53
1
2
8
1
1
1
2
28
1
*this is a composite of two dredge samples
12cd.-copepods, 13ta.-tabanids (flies)
                                     99
                                                            (continued)

-------
                           TABLE  23  (continued)
ORGANISM
Depth
Station (m) Group
cl.
1.
m.14
s.


t.

w.

23 1.3 a.
c.
cl.
1.
ma.15
m.
t.
w.



25 1.0 a.
s.


t.

w.
Identification
Pisidiwn sp.
Dina dub-La
unidentified
Gyrallus (type 1)
Gyrallus (type 2)
Lynmaea sp.
Mystaoides sp.
unidentified pupa
Peloscolex sp.
unidentified tubificids
Ryalella azteoa
Harnisch-ia sp.
P-is-idi-um sp.
Dina s p .
Parao loedes s p .
unidentified
unidentified Beraeidae
Peloscolex sp.
unidentified Lubriculidae
incomplete
unidentified tubificids
Hyalella azteca
Lymnaea S p .
Gyrallus (type 1 )
Gyrallus (type 2)
unidentified Beraeidae
Trianodes sp.
unidentified Lumbriculidae
Number
36
1
1
2
4
1
2
1
15
20
49
1
5
4
2
1
1
32

6
6
18
1
1
3
1
2
2
ll+m.-mites,  15ma.-mayfl ies
                                                            (continued)
                                     TOO

-------
TABLE
23 (continued)


ORGANISM
Depth
Station (m) Group
27 1.0 a.
c.
m.
n
s.

t.
w.
30 0.5 a.
ce.
c.

cl.
ma.
s.

t.

w.

35 1.3 a.
ce.
c.

cl.
1.
m.
Identification
Eyalella azteoa
Ablabesmyia
Papaoloedes
unidentified
Gyrallus (type 2)
Lymnaea sp.
unidentified Beraeidae
Peloscolex sp.
Hyalella azteoa
Palpomyia sp.
Cryptochironomus dig-itatus
Stictoch'ironomus rosenscholdi
Pisidium sp.
Paraoloeodes sp.
Physa sp.
Gyrallus (type 1 )
unidentified Beraeidae
Tnanodes sp.
unidentified Lumbriculidae
unidentified tubificid
Hyalella azteoa
PalpomyLa sp.
Polyped-iwn sp.
Stempell'ina sp.
P-is-id'lwn sp.
Dina sp.
unidentified
Number
12
1
2
1
3
1
1
1
10
1
4
6
2
2
1
5
1
1
1
2
6
3
1
1
1
1
1
                       (continued)






101

-------
                  TABLE 23 (continued)

ORGANISM
Depth
Station (m) Group
s.

ta.
t.
w.

Identification
Lyrrmaea
Gyrallus (type 2)
Chrysops sp.
unidentified Beraeidae
Pelosaolex sp.
unidentified tubificid
Number
2
5
1
1
7
4

    TABLE 24.  CHIRONOMIDS REARED FROM  HARDING  LAKE,  1974	

Tanypodinae
     Clinotanypus pinguis (Loew)
     Proaladius (Psilotanypos) bellus  (Loew)
     Procladius (Pr>ocad-ius) freemani  (Subl.)
Chironominae
     E-infeldia pagana (Meig.)
     Pca>achi.Tonomus sp.  n. near swamrnei'dami
     Chironomus cf. hyperboreus (Staeg.)
     Chironomus s p. n.
     Chironomus sp. (female) probably different from  the two above.
                            102

-------
o
OJ
                                                                                    N
                                                                             o
                                                                          KM
0.5
                                                                            CONTOUR  INTERVAL
                                                                                4 meters
                                        FIGURE  25
           MORPHOMETRIC MAP OF HARDING LAKE WITH SAMPLING STATIONS FOR BENTHOS AND
           BACTERIOLOGICAL SAMPLING INDICATED.

-------
     Justification for the study was based on two reasons:   (1) Coliform
bacteria studies conducted by the State of Alaska from the  period 1966
through 1971  indicated that serious contamination of the lake may have been
occurring.   Coliform data ranged up to 4,500 per 100 ml  recorded on August
30, 1966.   Additionally, during July of 1971, total coliform analyses indi-
cated a high value of 1,200 coliforms per 100 ml and the Department of
Health and Social Services, State of Alaska, considered closing the lakefront
to recreational use.  (2) During the early 1970s, Harding Lake property
owners expressed concern about the possible pollution and/or contamination of
Harding Lake.  Some of this concern was based on deterioration of aesthetic
values, which stemmed from improper disposal of solid waste and unsubstan-
tiated reports of sewage pollution of the lake.
     This investigation was considered of high priority in  the study of the
lake because of the high degree of recreational use of the  waters.  In the
Fairbanks area, only two moderate size lakes are easily accessible by the
road system and within 80 km of the community - Harding and Birch Lakes.
Harding Lake is the larger of the two and closer to the population center of
Fairbanks, therefore it receives a higher utilization.
     The bacteriological investigation included the collection and analyses
of samples for standard plate counts, total coliform counts, and fecal coli-
form counts.  Sample stations were established on the lake  waters and included
near-shore stations, some lying over bottom muds and others over gravel,
pelagic stations, and stations located along inlet streams.  Additionally,
vertical profile samples were taken within the lake for a determination of
mixing patterns and potential subsurface contamination.   Intensified sampling
occurred during July and August for the purpose of monitoring water quality
during period of high recreational use.
     A summary of data from the bacteriological investigation is included in
Tables 25 and 26.  Data from standard plate counts were found to be of
little value in detection of pollution or contamination and are, therefore,
not included with this summary.  Table 25 is a summary of the fecal coliform
information collected for Harding Lake.  All of the fecal coliform tests were
within the recommended limit (below 200 organisms per 100 ml) suggested by

                                      104

-------
TABLE 25.  STATISTICAL SUMMARY OF FECAL COLIFORM RESULTS.1 HARDING LAKE.   1973
Date
May 30
June 25
July 17
August 7
August 28
September 3
September 5
May 30
June 25
July 17
August 7
August 28
September 3
September 5
May 30
June 25
July 17
August 7
August 28
September 3
September 5
Number of
Samples
29
48
49
44
49
49
49
25
38
39
39
39
39
39
4
10
10
5
10
10
10
Mean
All Lake Stations
0
0.2
0.2
1.0
0.3
0.4
0.1
Near-Shore Stations
0
0.2
0.2
1.1
0.4
0.5
0.2
Pelagic Stations
0
0.2
0
0
0
0
0
Standard
Deviation

0.9
0.6
2.1
1.0
2.6
0.9

0.9
0.6
2.2
1.1
2.9
1.0

0.6





Range

0- 5
0- 2
0- 8
0- 6
0-18
0- 6

0- 5
0- 2
0- 8
0- 6
0-18
0- 6

0- 2





iFecal Coliforms/100 ml.
                                     105

-------
TABLE 26.   STATISTICAL SUMMARY OF TOTAL COLIFORM RESULTS.1  HARDING LAKE. 1973
Date
Number of
Samples Mean
Standard
Deviation
Range
All Lake Stations
May 30
June 25
July 17
August 7
August 28
September 3
September 5
29
48
49
44
49
49
49
3
6
9
6
318
297
166
.6
.1
.3
.5
.2
.5
.5
7.4
4.8
9.8
9.1
225.7
248.6
93.7
0-
0-
0-
0-
2-
30-1
20-
39
21
32
38
776
,480
390
Pelagic Stations
May 30
June 25
July 17
August 7
August 28
September 3
September 5
May 30
June 25
July 17
August 7
August 28
September 3
September 5
5
10
10
5
10
10
10
24
38
39
39
39
39
39
1
6
3
2
535
304
223
Near -Shore
4
6
10
7
262
295
152
.2
.2
.8
.0
.6
.0
.0
Stations
.1
.1
.8
.0
.5
.9
.0
1.6
3.4
9.4
2.8
102.4
84.9
66.8
8.1
5.1
9.5
9.5
215.0
276.3
94.8
0-
2-
0-
0-
444-
190-
130-
0-
2-
0-
0-
0-
30-1
20-
3
13
30
6
766
460
330
39
21
32
38
754
,480
390
 iTotal Coliforms/100 ml
(continued)
                                     106

-------
TABLE 26 (continued)

Date
May 30
June 25
July 17
August 7
August 28
September 3
September 5
May 30
June 25
July 17
August 7
August 28
September 3
September 5
Number of
Samples Mean
16
23
24
24
24
24
24
8
15
15
15
15
15
15
Mud Bottom
5.
8.
14.
5.
369.
397.
185.
Gravel Bottom
2.
2.
4.
9.
90.
135.
99.
Standard
Deviation
Stations
1
3
6
7
8
5
0
Stations
1
6
7
2
8
7
2
9.7
5.3
9.7
8.9
196.8
292.7
83.8
1.9
1.9
5.2
10.3
102.3
150.2
89.4
Range
0-
0-
0-
0-
8-
102-1
54-
0-
0-
0-
0-
2-
30-
20-
39
21
32
36
754
,480
390
5
7
14
38
348
536
320
       107

-------
the National  Technical  Advisory Committee (1968) as a standard for recrea-
tional water.  There was no single sample location or area where fecal
coliforms were consistently detected and thus it is felt that fecal contami-
nation was sporadic and of a local nature.   Due to the relatively low fecal
coliform values, it is  suggested that little, if any, domestic sewage was
entering Harding Lake from the developed area.
     Total coliform data is presented in Table 26 as a summary.  Total
coliform analyses showed that Harding Lake complied with State of Alaska
criteria for recreational waters during the study period.  Only one of over
300 total coliform analyses exceeded the criterion of 1,000 total coliforms
per 100 ml of sample.  Total coliform results were widely variable but again
it was concluded that little or no domestic sewage was contaminating the lake
from  its developed area.  Based on lack of correlation with the recreational
usage data, it was apparent that the human-use level at Harding Lake had no
adverse effect on total coliform number.  Although the results of the vertical
distribution study were inconclusive, it appeared that no significant increase
in bacterial numbers occurred with depth.
                                     108

-------
                                   REFERENCES
Alexander, V., and R. J. Barsdate.  1971.  Physical Limnology, Chemistry and
     Plant Productivity of a Taiga Lake.  Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol.,
     56:825-872.

American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water
     Pollution Control Federation.  1971.  Standard Methods for the Examina-
     tion of Water and Wastewater, 13th ed.  New York, New York.  874 pp.

Bachmann, R. W., and J. R. Jones.  1974.  Phosphorus Inputs and Algal Blooms
     in Lakes.  Iowa State Journal of Research, 49:155-160.

Baker, A. L., and A. J. Brook.   1971.  Optical Density Profiles as an Aid to
     the Study of Microstratified Phytoplankton Populations in Lakes.  Arch.
     Hydrobiol., 69:214-233.

Barsdate, R. J.  1966.  Pathways of Trace Elements in Arctic Lake Ecosystem.
     Progress Report to the Atomic Energy Commission (for the period 15
     April 1965 through 14 April 1966) AEC Contract AT(04-3)-310 PA No. 4.
     86 pp.

Barsdate, R. J.  1967.  Pathways of Trace Elements in Arctic Lake Ecosystems.
     Progress Report to the Atomic Energy Commission (for the period
     15 April 1966 through 14 April 1967) AEC Contract AT(04-3)-310 PA
     No. 4.  58 pp.

Barsdate, R. J., and V. Alexander.  1971.  Geochemistry and Primary
     Productivity of the Tangle  Lake Systems, an Alaskan Alpine Watershed.
     Arctic and Alpine Research, 3:27-41.

Blackwell, J. M.  1965.  Surficial Geology and Geomorphology of the Harding
     Lake Area, Big Delta Quadrangle, Alaska.  M.S. Thesis, University of
     Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska.  91 pp.

Brewer, M. C.  1958.  The Thermal Regime of an Arctic Lake.  Transactions,
     American Geophysical Union, 39:278-284.

Brooks, J. L.  1959.  Cladocera.  In:  Freshwater  Biology, W. T. Edmondson,
     Ed., Second Edition.  John  Wiley & Sons, Inc.  New  York.   London.
     1248 pp.

Clark, F. W.  1924.  The Data of Geochemistry.  Fifth Ed.  Bull. U.  S.  Geol.
     Surv. 770.  841 pp.


                                     109

-------
Cole, G.  A.   1975.   Textbook of Limnology.  C. V. Mosby Co., St. Louis,
     Missouri.   283 pp.

Dillon, P.  J.,  and F.  H.  Rigler.  1974.  The Phosphorus-Chlorophyll Relation-
     ship in Lakes.  Limnol. and Oceanog., 19:767-773.

Dillon, P.  J.,  and F.  H.  Rigler.  1975.  A Simple Method for Predicting the
     Capacity of a Lake for Development Based on Lake Trophic Status.  J. Fish.
     Res. Board Can.,  32:1519-1531.

Environment Canada,  (undated)  Manual of Methods for Chemical Analysis.
     Environment Canada,  Freshwater Institute, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
     92 pp.

Eppley, R.  W.,  and J.  H.  Sharp.  1975.  Photosynthetic Measurements in the
     Central North Pacific:  the Dark Loss of Carbon in 24-hr. Incubations.
     Limnol. Oceanog., 20:981-987.

Gales, M. E., and R. L. Booth.  1974.  Simultaneous and Automated Determi-
     nation of Total Phosphorus and Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen.  EPA-670/4-74-002.
     U. S.  Environmental  Monitoring Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.  21 pp.

Goldman, C.  R.   1963.   The Measurement of Primary Productivity and Limiting
     Factors in Freshwater with Carbon-14.  In:  Primary Productivity
     Measurement, Marine and Freshwater, M.S. Doty, ed.  U. S. Atomic
     Energy Commission TID-7633.  pp. 103-113.

Goldman, C.  R.   1974.   Eutrophication of Lake Tahoe Emphasizing Water Quality.
     EPA-660/3-74-034, USEPA Ecological Research Series, Con/all is, Oregon.
     408 pp.

Golterman, H. L. ed.  1969.  Methods for Chemical Analysis of Fresh Waters.
     IBP Handbook No.  8, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford and
     Edinburg.   166 pp.

Gruendling, G.  K., and J. L. Malanchuk.  1974.   Seasonal and Spatial
     Distribution of Phosphates, Nitrates, and Silicates in Lake Champlain,
     USA.  Hydrobiologia, 45:405-421.

Hobbie, J. E.  1962.  Limnological Cycles and Primary Productivity of Two
     Lakes in the Alaskan Arctic.  Ph.D. Thesis,  Indiana University.
     Bloomington.  124 pp.

Hobbie, J. E.  1964.  Carbon  14 Measurements of  Primary Production in Two
     Arctic Alaskan Lakes.  Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol.  15:360-364.

Hobbie, J. E.  1973.  Arctic Limnology, a Review.   In:  Alaska Arctic Tundra,
     M. E. Britton, ed., Technical Paper No. 25, Arctic Institute of North
     America, Washington, D.C.  pp. 127-168.
                                     110

-------
Hutchinson, G. E.  1957.  A Treatise on Limnology.  Vol 1.   Geography, Physics
     and Chemistry.  Wiley, New York.  1015 pp.

Johnson, P. R., and C. W. Hartman.  1969.   Environmental Atlas of Alaska.
     Institute of Arctic Environmental Engineering, Institute of Water
     Resources, University of Alaska, Fairbanks.  109 pp.

Jones, J. R., and R.  W. Bachmann.  1976.   Prediction of Phosphorus and
     Chlorophyll  Levels in Lakes.  Journal Water Pollution  Control Federation,
     48:2176-2182.

Kalff, J., and S. Holmgren.  1971.  Phytoplankton.  In:  International
     Biological Program Annual  Report on Char Lake Project.  University of
     Toronto, Department of Zoology,  pp.  8-9.

Kalff, J., and H. E.  Welch.  1974.  Phytoplankton Production in Char Lake, a
     Natural Polar Lake, and in Meretta Lake, a Polluted Polar Lake,
     Cornwallis Island, Northwest Territories.  J. Fish. Res. Board Can.,
     31:621-636.

Lake Tahoe Area Council.  1971.  Eutrophication of Surface Waters-Lake Tahoe.
     EPA 16010 DWS 05/71, USEPA, Washington, D.C.  154 pp.

Lande, A.  1973.   Byglandsfjorden.  Primary Production and Other Limnological
     Features in  an Oligotrophic Norwegian Lake.  Hydrobiologia, 42:335-344.

LaPerriere, J. D.  1975.  Evaluation of the Trophic Types of Several Alaskan
     Lakes by Assessment of the Benthic Fauna.  IWR-63, Institute of Water
     Resources, University of Alaska, Fairbanks.  49 pp.

LaPerriere, J. D., and L. A.  Casper.  1976.   Biogeochemistry of Deep Lakes
     in the Central Alaska Range.  IWR-68, Institute of Water Resources,
     University of Alaska, Fairbanks.  35  pp.

LaPerriere, J. D., and B. R.  Robertson (compilers).  1973.   The Distribution
     and Succession of Aquatic  Vascular Plant Communities in Relation to
     Physical-Chemical Characteristics of  Various Lakes and Ponds of the
     Tanana Valley, Central Alaska.   Institute of Water Resources, University
     of Alaska, Fairbanks.  17  pp.

Larson, G. L.  1973.   A Limnology Study of a High Mountain Lake in Mount
     Rainier National  Park, Washington State, USA.  Arch. Hydrobiol.,
     72(l):10-48.

Larson, P. R.  1974.   Evaluation of Water Quality and Pollution Control at
     Harding Lake, Alaska.  M.S. Thesis, University of Alaska, Fairbanks,
     Alaska.  159 pp.

Lind, 0. T.  1974.  Handbook of Common Methods  in Limnology.  The C. V. Mosby
    'company, Saint Louis.  154 pp.
                                      Ill

-------
Livingstone,  D.  A.   1963.   Alaska, Yukon, Northwest Territories, and Greenland.
     In:   Limnology in North America, D. G. Frey, ed. University of Wisconsin,
     Madison,   pp.  559-574.

Lueschow, L.  A., J. M. Helm, I.  R. Witner, and G. W. Karl.  1970.  Trophic
     Nature of Selected Wisconsin Lakes.  Trans.  Wise. Acad. Sci. Arts and
     Letters,  58:237-264.

Maeda, 0., and S. Ichimura.   1973.  On the High Density of a Phytoplankton
     Population Found in a Lake under Ice.  Int.  Revue ges. Hydrobiol.,
     58:673-685.

National  Technical  Advisory Committee.  1969.   Water Quality Criteria.
     Federal  Water Pollution Control Administration, Washington, D. C.  234 pp.

Nyquist,  D.  1971.   Limnology of Harding Lake with Implications of Resource
     Development.  Paper read at 22nd Alaska Science Conference, August 1971,
     at University of Aalska, Fairbanks, Alaska.

Pechlaner, R.   1966.  Die Finstertaler Seen (Kutai, Osterreich).  I.
     Morphometrie, Hydrographie, Limnophysik and Limnochemie.  Arch.
     Hydrobiol., 62:165-230.

Rigler, F. H.   1964.  The Phosphorus Fractions and the Turnover Time of
     Inorganic Phosphorus in Different Types of Lakes.  Limnol. Oceanog.,
     9:511-518.

Rigler, F. H., M. E. MacCallum, and J. C. Roff.  1974.  Production of
     Zooplankton in Char Lake.  J. Fish. Res.  Board Can., 31:637-646.

Rodhe, W.  1955.  Can Plankton Production Proceed during Winter Darkness in
     Subarctic Lakes?  Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol., 12:117-122.

Rodhe, W.  1965.  Standard Correlations between Pelagic Photosynthesis and
     Light.  Mem. 1st. Hal. Idrobiol., (supplement), 18:365-381.

Saether,  0. A.  1975.  Nearctic Chironomids as Indicators of Lake Typology.
     Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol., 19:3127-3133.

Saunders, G.  W., F. B. Trama, and R. W. Bachmann.  1962.  Evaluation of a
     Modified C-14 Technique for Shipboard Estimation of Photosynthesis in
     a Large Lake.  Great Lakes Div., Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
     Publication #8:1-61.

Schindler, D.  W.  1977.  Evolution of Phosphorus Limitation in Lakes.
     Science,  195:260-262.

Schindler, D.  W., and J. E.  Nighswander.  1970.  Nutrient Supply and Primary
     Production in Clear Lake, Eastern Ontario.  J. Fish. Res. Board Can.,
     27:2009-2036.
                                       12

-------
Schindler, D. W., R. V. Schmidt, and R. A. Reid.  1972.  Acidification and
     Bubbling as an Alternative to Filtration in Determining Phytoplankton
     Production by the   C Method.  0. Fish. Res. Board Can., 29:1627-1631.

Schindler, D. W., H. E. Welch, J. Kalff, G. J. Burnskill, and N. Kritsch.
     1974.  Physical and Chemical Limnology of Char Lake, Cornwall is Island
     (75°N lat.).  J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 31:585-607.

Schoephorster,  D. B.  1973.  Soil Survey of Salcha—Big Delta Area, Alaska.
     United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, in
     cooperation with University of Alaska, Institute of Agricultural
     Sciences.  U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Shapiro, J.   1973.  A Field Fixation Technique for Dissolved Phosphate in
     Lake Water.  Limnol. Oceanog., 18:143-145.

Stainton, M.  P.  1973.  A Syringe Gas-Stripping  Procedure for Gas-Chromato-
     graphic  Determination of Dissolved  Inorganic and Organic Carbon in  Fresh
     Water and  Carbonates in Sediments.  J. Fish. Res.  Board Can., 30:1441-
     1445.

Stainton, M.  P.  1974.  Simple  Efficient Reduction Column for Use in the
     Automated  Determination of Nitrate  in Water.  Anal. Chem., 46:1616.

Steemann-Nielsen, E.  1952.  The Use of  Radio-active  (sic) Carbon (C   )  for
     Measuring  Organic  Production in the Sea.  J. du  Conseil.,  18:117-140.

Steele, J. H.,  and  I. E. Baird.  1961.   Relations between Primary Production,
     Chlorophyll and Particulate Carbon.  Limnol. Oceanog.,  6:68-78.

Stewart,  K. M., and S.  J. Markello.  1974.  Seasonal  Variations in Concentra-
     tions of Nitrate and Total Phosphorus, and  Calculated Nutrient  Loading
     for  Six  Lakes  in Western New York.  Hydrobiologia, 44:61-89.

Strickland, J.  D. H., and T. R. Parsons.  1965.  A Manual of Sea  Water
     Analysis.  Bulletin No. 125, Fisheries Research  Board of Canada,  Ottawa.
     203  pp.

Str0m,  K. M.  1932.  Nordfjord  Lakes,  A  Limnology  Survey.  Skrifter  Det
     Norske Viden. Akad. I. Oslo No. 8.  56 pp.

U. S, Environmental Protection  Agency.   1971.   Methods  for Chemical  Analysis
     of Water and Wastes.  Analytical  Quality  Control  Laboratory, USEPA.
     Cincinnati, Ohio.  312 pp.

U. S. Environmental Protection  Agency.   1974.   Methods  for  Chemical  Analysis
     of Water and Wastes.  Methods  Development  and  Quality  Assurance
     Research Laboratory, USEPA.  Cincinnati,  Ohio.   298  pp.
                                       113

-------
Vollenweider, R.  A., ed.   1969a.  A Manual on Methods for Measuring Production
     in Aquatic Environments.   IBP Handbook No. 12.  F. A. Davis Company,
     Philadelphia, Pa.   213 pp.

Vollenweider, R.  A.   1969b.  Mbglichkeiten und Grenzen elementarer Modelle der
     Stoffbilanz von Seen.  Arch. Hydrobiol., 65:1-136.

Vollenweider, R.  A.   1971.  Scientific Fundamentals of the Eutrophication of
     Lakes and Flowing Waters, with Particular Reference to Nitrogen and
     Phosphorus as Factors in Eutrophication.  Organization for Economic
     Cooperation and Development, Paris.   159 pp.

Vollenweider, R.  A.   1975.  Input-Output Models, with Special Reference to
     the Phosphorus-Loading Concept in Limnology.   Schweiz.  Zeit. Hydrol.,
     37:53-84.

Watson, C., C. Branton, and J. Newman.  1971.  Climatic Characteristics of
     Selected Alaskan Locations.  Technical Bulletin #2, Institute of
     Agricultural Sciences, University of Alaska,  Fairbanks, Alaska.  56 pp.

Weeden, R. B.  1971.  Problems in Public Management of Accessible Lakes in
     Interior Alaska.  Paper read at 22nd Alaska Science Conference, August
     1971, at University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska.

Welch, H. E., and J. Kalff.  1974.  Benthic Photosynthesis and Respiration in
     Char Lake.  J.  Fish. Res. Board Can., 31:609-620.

Wetzel, R. G.  1975.  Limnology.  W. B. Saunders Company.  Philadelphia,
     London, Toronto.  743 pp.

World Meteorological Organization.  1970.  The Guide to Hydrometeorological
     Practices.  Second Edition.  Secretariat of the World Meteorological
     Organization.  Geneva, Switzerland.

Wright, R. T., and J. E.  Hobbie.  1965.  The Uptake of Organic Solutes in
     Lake Water.   Limnol. Oceanog., 10:22-28.
                                     114

-------
                                    APPENDIX


                                                                        Page

A-l  Ammonia Nitrogen Concentration (ug/1 as N), Harding Lake--1973 .  .   116

A-2  Chlorophyll a Concentrations, Deep and Shallow Stations,
     Harding Lake—1973-1974	118

A-3  Chlorophyll a and Phaeopigment Concentrations, Shallow
     Stations, Harding Lake--1975 	 „  	   120

A-4  Plant Transect Data Summary, Harding Lake--1974	123
                                      115

-------
TABLE A-1.   AMMONIA NITROGEN  CONCENTRATION  (vg/1  as  N).   HARDING  LAKE.   1973
Deep Station I
Depth (m) Apr 26
1
2
4
5 20
10 5
15
20 5
25
30
40 5
Deep Station
Depth (m) Apr 26
1
2
3 3
4
5 2
10 2
20 2
Jun 17 Jul 16 Aug 6 Oct 23 Dec 4
5 15 10 11
<2 10 14
<2 11 10
<2 9
<2 116
<2 6
<2 6
6
3

II Shallow Station II
Jun 17 Depth (m) Apr 26 Jun 17 Jul 16
<2 1 4 21
<2 <2
4 <2
<2 5 10
6 <2
<2 8 4
3 10 6
                                                           (continued)
                                    116

-------
                              TABLE A-l  (continued)
	    Shallow Station III	     	Shallow  Station  IV
Depth (m)     Apr 26     Jun 17     Jul  16     Depth  (m)     Apr  26     Jun  17
1
2
4
5
6
8
10
15
2 25
3
3
5
2
<2
8 4
5 <2
                                                   1                      <2
                                                   2
                                                   4
                                                   5            12
                                                   6
                                                   8                      <2
                                                  10             62
                                     117

-------
                    TABLE A-2.   CHLOROPHYLL  a CONCENTRATIONS*
              HARDING LAKE.   DEEP  AND SHALLOW STATIONS.   1973-1974

DEEP STATION
August 6,
Depth
(m)
0
2
4
6
8
10
1973
Concentration
(mg/m )
0.68
0.84
1.00
0.77
1.12
0.84
December 4
Depth
(m)
0
2
4
6
8
10
15
20
25
30


± 0.
± 0.
± 0.
± 0.


04
07
24
06


, 1973
Concentration
(mg/m3)
0.41
0.50
0.53
0.55
0.75
0.73
0.54
0.39
0.39
0.34


± 0.

± 0.
± 0.

± 0.
± 0.
± 0.
± 0.
± 0.


04

07
00

04
01
08
01
01


August
I
27, 1973
Depth Concentration
2
(m) (mg/m )
0
2
4
6
8
10
March
Depth
(m)
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
20
25
30
35
0.67
0.72
0.74
0.74
0.88
0.98
15,
± 0.
± 0.
+ 0.
± 0.
± 0.
± 0.
1974
06
04
02
01
06
10

Concentration
(mg/m )
1.92
0.88
0.61
0.45
0.42
0.35
0.28
0.27
0.29
0.29
0.32
0.25
± 0.
± 0.
± 0.
± 0.

± 0.
± 0.
± 0.
± 0.
± 0.
± 0.
± 0.
15
03
11
00

01
03
01
04
04
05
04


October 18,
Depth
(m)
0
2
4




Depth
(m)
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
20
25
30
35


1973
Concentration
(mg/m )
0
1
1



April
.97
.00
.07



16,
± 0.04
± 0.03
± 0.08



1974
Concentration
(mg/m )
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.92
.27
.35
.79
.56
.45
.42
.32
.24
.30
.39
.30
± 0.15

± 0.02
± 0.03
± 0.02
± 0.00

± 0.04

± 0.00
± 0.02
± 0.01
^calculated  according  to  Strickland  and  Parsons  (1965)
                                                            (continued)
                                     118

-------
                              TABLE A-2 (continued)

SHALLOW STATION II
August
Depth
(m)
0
2
4
6
8
10
27, 1973
Concentration
0
(mg/m )
0.66
0.86 ± 0.15
0.91
0.74 ± 0.01
0.75 ± 0.01
0.66
March 15, 1974
Depth Concentration
(m) (mg/m3)
2 1.88 ± 0.04





 SHALLOW STATION III
    August 6, 1973
Depth    Concentration
                 q
 (m)        (mg/m )
  0       0.65 ± 0.17
  2       0.81 ± 0.13
  4       0.74 ± 0.28
  6       0.99 ± 0.08
  8       0.89 ± 0.09
 10       1.15 ± 0.09
            SHALLOW STATION  IV
    March 15, 1974
Depth    Concentration
 (m)        (mg/m )
   April  6,  1974
Depth    Concentration
 (m)        (mg/m )
          0.39 ± 0.06
  2       0.83
  3       2.24 ± 0.24
                                      119

-------
           TABLE A-3.   CHLOROPHYLL a AND  PHAEOPIGMENT CONCENTRATIONS*
                     HARDING  LAKE.  SHALLOW  STATIONS.   1975


Depth
(m)
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
Shallow Station
May 29
Chlorophyll a Phaeophytin
(mg/m ) (mg/m )
1.49
1.44
1.84
2.09
July 16
Chlorophyll a Phaeophytin
3 3
(mg/m ) (mg/m )
0.65
0.70
0.42
0.68
August 14
Chlorophyll a Phaeophytin
3 3
(mg/m ) (mg/m )
0.79
0.68
0.39 0.71
0.59 0.14
I
June
Chlorophyll a
o
(mg/m )
0.52
0.61
0.67
0.78
July
Chlorophyll a
o
(mg/m )
0.65
0.52
0.56
0.69
August
Chlorophyll a
(mg/m )
0.62
0.43
0.57
0.81

19
Phaeophytin
(mg/m )




30
Phaeophytin
q
(mg/m )

.008


26
Phaeophytin
q
(mg/m )

0.30
0.09

Calculated according  to  Golterman  (1969)
                                                            (continued)
                                     120

-------
TABLE A-3 (continued)
Depth
(m)
1
2
3
4
Depth
(m)
1
2
4
6
8
10
12

Depth
(m)
1
2
3
October 13
Chlorophyll a Phaeophytin
3 3
(mg/m ) (mg/m )
0.65 0.53
0.82 0.01
0.57 0.09
0.91
Shallow Station
February 22
Chlorophyll a Phaeophytin
(mg/m3) (mg/m3)

0.79
0.31
0.07 0.18
0.00 0.09
0.53
0.14 0.01
Shallow Station
March 22
Chlorophyll a Phaeophytin
3 3
(mg/m ) (mg/m )
0.65
0.71
0.66




II
April 11
Chlorophyll a Phaeophytin
(mg/m3) (mg/m3)
2.73
2.18
2.22
0.55 0.03
0.34 0.02
0.31 0.03
0.57
IV
May 3
Chlorophyll a Phaeophytin
(mg/m ) (mg/m3)
1.23
1.30
1.43
                              (continued)
       121

-------
TABLE A-3 (continued)


Depth
(m)
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3


Chlorophyl
o
(mg/m )
0.63
0.80
0.75

Chlorophyl
(mg/m )
0.51
0.69
0.81

Chlorophyl
0
(mg/m )
0.24
0.64
0.75
Shallow Station
June 19
1 a Phaeophytin
(mg/m )



July 30
1 a Phaeophytin
(mg/m )
.004


August 26
1 a Phaeophytin
(mg/m )
0.46
0.15

V
July 16
Chlorophyll a
2
(mg/m )
0.64
0.32
0.84
August
Chlorophyll a
(mg/m )
0.76
0.73
0.73
October
Chlorophyll a
(mg/m )
0.79
0.44
0.75


Phaeophytin
(mg/m )

0.33

14
Phaeophytin
(mg/m )


0.08
13
Phaeophytin
0
(mg/m )
0.06
0.45
0.17
            122

-------
TABLE A-4.  PLANT TRANSECT DATA SUMMARY.  HARDING LAKE.   1974

Distance
From Shore
(m)

5

10


15


20


25


30
35
40

45

50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
Depth
(cm)

5

25


35


50


60


80
90
100

120

140
160
180
190
200
200
230
250
270
290
310
Species
Transect 1
G. borealis
E. acicularis
G. borealis
P. filiformis
J. muricata
E. acicularis
J. muricata
P. filiformis
E. acicularis
I. muricata
P. filiformis
P. Richardsonii
E. acicularis
I. muricata
I. rrturieata
I. muricata
E. acicularis
J. muricata
I. muri,cata
E. ac'iculap'is
I. murioata
I. mur-ioata
I. murieata
I. mwcTsCat-a
I. mua"leata
I. muT'Loata
P. Riohardsonii
P. Riohardsonii
P. Richards onii
P. Richardson-Li
Chora sp.
Height
(cm)

a, 40
2
•\. 40
6-8
5
6
5
10
2
3
6-8
10
1
3
1
6
2
5
6
2
3
3
4
4
4
2
40
60
60
30
6
Cover
%

20
40
30
20
5
5
80
5
80
20
20
5
10
20
20
70
5
25
50
5
25
40
20
30
20
5
20
50
50
20
50
                                                   (continued)
                             123

-------
TABLE A-4 (continued)
Distance
From Shore
(m)

5


10

15



20

25

30

5
10
15


20



25

30
35

40
45
Depth
(cm)

58


95

120



140

120

130

80
35
45


60



70

80
88

no
130


J.
P.
s.
I.
p.
E.
I.
P.
P.
I.
P.
I.
P.
I.

S.
S.
I.
p.
s.
I.
p.
p.
s.
I.
p.
I.
I.
p.
I.
I.
Species
Transect 2
muriaata
Richards onii
angus tifo 1 iim
murioata
gramineus
aciulavis
rmricata
gpomineus
Riohardsonii
muricata
gpomineus
murioata
gramineus
murioata
Transect 3
angustifoliwn
angus tifo Hum
murioata
filiformis
angus tifo 1 ium
murioata
fi liformis
gvamineus
angus tifo 1 ium
mupicata
gramineus
murieata
muriaata
gramineus
murieata
muricata
Height
(cm)

2
22
9
3
12
3
3
50-120
20
4
20-40
5
50
5

60
•^100
4
10
•^100
5
15
20
MOO
4
20
5
5
40
4
5
Cover
%

60
5
negl .
80
10
40
50
5
negl .
20
15
5
5
5

20
50
20
80
80
50
10
5
10
40
5
100
100
negl.
100
70
                              (continued)
        124

-------
TABLE A-4 (continued)

Distance
From Shore
(m)
50

55

60

65



70

75

80
85
90

95

100

5

10



15



20

Depth
(cm)
150

160

170

195



210

240

250
280
300

320

340

6

18



25



32

Species
I. muricata
P. Richards onii
I. muricata
P. Richards onii
Myriophyllum sp.
P. Richardsonii
I. muricata
Myriophyllum sp.
P. Richardsonii
Ranunculus sp.
Myriophyllum sp.
P. Richardsonii
Myriophyllum sp.
P. Richards onii
Myriophy 1 lum S p .
Myriophyllum sp.
Myriophyllum sp.
P. Richardsonii
Char a sp.
Myriophyllum sp.
Myriophyllum sp.
Transect 4
S. angusti folium
S. aquatica
E. acicularis
P. gramineus
S. fluctuans
S. aquatica
I. muricata
P. gramineus
P, Richardsonii
S. augustifotium
E. acicularis
P. Richardsonii
Height
(cm)
5
100
5
100
50
100
6
60
100
6
30
50
60
150
50
40
20
200
6
20
20

•v 60
3
2
12
-v 60
2
4
15
20
•^100
2
20
Cover
%
40
50
30
50
30
50
20
30
40
10
50
20
80
negl.
60
20
negl .
60
negl .
negl .
negl .

80
40
10
10
50
20
negl .
5
negl .
50
50
50
                              (continued)
       125

-------
TABLE A-4 (continued)
Distance
From Shore
(m)
25


30



35



40

45

50

55

60

65
5
10
15

Depth
(cm)
40


45



55



80

105

125

155

255

345
20
35
42


E.
I.
P.
P.
E.
I.
P.
P.
S.
E.
I.
P.
P.
S.
I.
P.
P.
I.
P.
J.
P.
I.
P.
I.
P.
P.
no
E.
I.
P.
P.
P.
Species
acicularis
muricata
gramineus
Richardsonii
acicularis
muricata
gramineus
Richardsonii
angus tifo lium
acicularis
muricata
gramineus
Richards onii
angus tifo lium
muricata
gramineus
Richardsonii
muricata
Richardsonii
muricata
Richardsonii
muricata
Richardsonii
muricata
Richardsonii
Richardsonii
Transect 5
plants
acicularis
muricata
gramineus
filiformis
gramineus
Height
(cm)
4
5
25
20
2
3
20
25
^110
2
3
30
25
•v 55
4
40
25
5
50
6
90
6
100
10
100
150

2
2
10
10
10
Cover
30
10
10
80
10
20
10
80
40
10
10
20
60
negl.
50
20
30
100
20
80
30
50
20
50
20
10

negl .
negl.
negl .
5
10
                              (continued)
       126

-------
TABLE A-4 (continued)

Distance
From Shore
(m)
20


25



30

35


40

45
50
55

60

65

70


75


5
10
15
20
25
Depth
(cm)
55


85



95

110


120

135
140
150

175

200

240


270


30
40
50
70
90
Species
P. filiformis
P. gramineus
P. Richards onii
I, rmricata
P. filiformis
P. gramineus
P. Richards ami
P. filiformis
P. Richardsonii
E. acicularis
P. filiformis
P. Richardsonii
E. acicularis
P. Richardsonii
P. Richards onii
P. Richardsonii
P. praelongus
P. Richardsonii
P. praelongus
P. Richardsonii
P. praelongus
P, Richardson-Li
Chora sp.
P. praelongus
P. Richardsonii
P. praelongus
P. Richardsonii
Transect 6
no plants
no plants
no plants
P, Richards onii
P. Richards onii
Height
(cm)
10
10
30
3
10
10
30
10
20
4
10
40
4
100
100
100
120
100
130
100
150
80
10
150
30
100
20




25
25
Cover
%
5
10
negl .
negl .
5
10
negl .
negl.
5
80
5
5
40
30
50
50
20
40
10
50
40
40
negl .
20
negl .
negl .
negl .




40
40
                              (continued)
       127

-------
TABLE A-4 (continued)
Distance
From Shore
(m)
30
35
40
45
50
55

60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110

115
120
125
130
Depth
(cm)
110
120
135
150
165
175

180
185
205
230
245
260
275
300
320
330
350

365
380
400
420
Species
no plants
no plants
no plants
Ranunoulus sp.
P. Richardsonii
J. muvicata
P. Richards onii
P. Richardson-Li
P. filiformis
no plants
no plants
no plants
no plants
P. Richardsonii
P. Richardsonii
P. Richardsonii
P. Richards onii
P. Freisii
P. Richardsonii
P. Freisii
P. Freisii
P. Freisii
P. Fveisii
Height
(cm)



2
100
6
100
90
10




100
100
100
50
20
100
20
20
20
20
Cover
°/
h



negl.
5
10
30
15
negl .




30
60
30
5
50
5
50
negl .
negl.
negl .
       128

-------
                                   TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
  REPORT NO.
  EPA-600/3-78-088
                                                           3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
   Nutrient Chemistry  of  A Large Deep Lake in
   Subarctic Alaska
             5. REPORT DATE
              September 1978
             6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
                                                           8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
   J.D. LaPerriere, Tilsworth,  and L.A. Casper
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS

   Institute of Hater Resources
   University of Alaska
   Fairbanks, Alaska 99501
                                                           10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                1BA608
             11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.

              R800276
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
   Environmental Research  Laboratory-Corvallis
   Office of Research  and  Development
   US. Environmental Protection Agency
   Corvallis, Oregon   97330	
                                                           13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                                                             extramural  - final
             14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
              EPA/600/02
 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
 16. ABSTRACT
          The primary  objective of this project was to assess  the  state of the water
 quality of Harding  Lake,  and to attempt to predict the effects  of future development
 within its watershed.   Since the major effect of degradation  of water quality due to
 human activity is the promotion of nuisance growths of plants,  the major emphasis was
 placed on measurements  of plant growth and concentrations of  the  major nutrients they
 require.   Planktonic  algal  growth was found to be low, below  95.6 gm/nr/year, and the
 growth of submerged rooted plants was found to be relatively  less important at approx-
 imately 1.35 gm/m^/year.   Measurements of the growth of attached  algae were not con-
 ducted, therefore the relative importance of their growth is  currently unknown.  A
 model for predicting  the  effect of future real  estate development in the watershed was
 modified and applied  to this lake.  This model adequately describes current water quali'1
 conditions, and is  assumed to have some predictive ability, but several  cautions con-
 cerning application of  this  model to Harding Lake are discussed.   A secondary objective
 was to study the thermal  regime of a deep subarctic lake.  Hydrologic and energy budgets
 of this lake are attempted;  the annual heat budget is estimated at 1.96x10^ - 1.7x10^
 cal/cm .   The results of  a study of domestic water supply and waste disposal alternative
 in the watershed, and the potential for enteric bacterial contamination of the lake
 water are presented.   Limited work on the zooplankton, fishes and benthic macroinverte-
 brates of this lake is  also  presented.
17.
                                KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
                                              b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDEDTERMS
                          c.  COSATl Field/Group
 Water Quality
 Nutrients
 Nutrient Chemistry
 Watershed
 Zooplankton
 Benthic Macroiinvertebrates
 Submerged rooted  plants
                           08/H,J
                           13/B
                           06/C
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
  Release to public
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
   unclassified
                                                                         21. NO. OF PAGES
20 SECURITY CLASS {This page)
   unclassified
                           22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (Rev. 4-77)
                                                            *U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1978—7'i||-'iin v
                                             129

-------