STAR Series
ASSESSMENT REPORT
           ON CADMIUM

    nvironmental Proteelion Agency
   lice of Research and Development
          Washington, D.C. 20460

-------
                                         EPA-600/6-75-003
                                             March 1975
SCIENTIFIC  AND TECHNICAL
     ASSESSMENT REPORT
          ON  CADMIUM
         (Program Element 1AA001)
              Assembled by

    National Environmental Research Center
     Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

                 for

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
     Office of Research and Development
        Office of Program Integration
          Washington, D.C. 20460

-------
                       RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES

Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, have
been grouped into series. These broad categories were established to  facilitate further development and
application of environmental technology. Elimination of traditional grouping was consciously planned to
foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields. These series are:

        1.   Environmental Health Effects Research
        2.   Environmental Protection Technology
        3.   Ecological Research
        4.   Environmental Monitoring
        5.   Socioeconomic Environmental Studies
        6.   Scientific and Technical Assessment Reports (STAR)
        9.  Miscellaneous Reports

This report has been assigned to the SCIENTIFIC AND  TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT REPORTS (STAR)
series. This series assesses the available scientific and technical knowledge on major pollutants that would be
helpful  in  possible EPA  regulatory  decision-making regarding  the  pollutant  or  assesses the state of
knowledge of a major area of completed study. The series endeavors to present an objective assessment of
existing knowledge, pointing out the extent to which it is definitive, the validity of the data on which it is
based, and uncertainties and gaps that may exist. Most of the reports will be multi-media in scope, focusing
on a single mecKum only to the extent warranted by the distribution of environmental insult.
                                EPA REVIEW  NOTICE

This report has been reviewed by the Office of Research and Development, EPA,  and approved for
publication.  Mention of  trade  names or  commercial  products  does  not constitute endorsement or
recommendation for use.
                          DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

This report is available to the public from Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office,
Washington, D.C.  20402.

-------
                                          PREFACE

     Although this report is issued in the Scientific and Technical Assessment Report Series, it differs in
several respects from  the comprehensive multi-media format that the Series will usually have because it was
nearly completed prior to the creation of the STAR series in August 1974.

     This document was prepared  by a task force convened at  the direction of Dr. John F. Finklea,
Director, U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), National Environmental Research Center (NERC)
at Research Triangle Park (RTF), N. C. Assembly,  integration, and  production of the report were directed
by the Special Studies  Staff, NERC-RTP. The objective  of the task force was to review and evaluate the
current knowledge of cadmium in  the environment, especially in  the atmosphere, as related to possible
deleterious effects upon human health  and welfare. Information from the literature and other sources has
been considered generally through January 1973.

     The primary reference  for  this report  was Cadmium  in the Environment (Publication Number
EPA-R2-73-190),  a  review  on cadmium performed under  a contract agreement between the U. S.
Environmental Protection Agency and  the Department of Environmental Hygiene of the Karolinska
Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

     The following members served on  the NERC Task Force:

             James R. Smith, Chairman            Robert E. Lee
             Roy L. Bennett                     Magnus Piscator
             Robert P. Botts                     John E. Sigsby
             Dennis C. Drehmel                  E. C. Tabor
             J. H. B. Garner                      Richard Thompson
             Jay D.  Gile                          Darryl Von Lehmden
             Bruce Henschel                     Anthony Zavadil

     The substance  of the document was  reviewed  by the National Air Quality  Criteria  Advisory
Committee (NAQCAC) in public session on March 15, 1973. Members of the NAQCAC were:

             Mary O. Amdur  Harvard University
             David M. Anderson - Bethlehem Steel Corporation
             Anna M.  Baetjer  Johns Hopkins University
             Samuel S. Epstein - Case Western Reserve University
             Arie D. Haagen-Smit - California Institute of Technology
             John V. Krutilla  Resources for the Future, Inc.
             Frank J. Massey, Jr. - University of California
             James McCarrol - University of Washington
             Eugene P. Odum  University of Georgia
             Elmer P.  Robinson - Washington State  University
             Morton Sterling - Wayne County (Michigan) Health Department
             Arthur C. Stern - University of North Carolina
             Raymond R. Suskind - University of Cincinnati
             Elmer P. Wheeler  Monsanto Company
             John T. Wilson  Howard University
             Ernst Linde, Executive Secretary

                                              iii

-------
     A final formal review of the report was conducted by a Task Force convened under the direction of
Dr. J. Wesley Clayton, Jr., of the Office of Research and Development, EPA, Washington, D. C., on October
9, 1973. Members of the Task Force were:

             Dr. Kenneth Cantor, Division Coordinator
                  J. H. B. Garner
                  T. Gleason
                  A. J. Goldberg
                  Irene Kiefer
                  Robert E. McGaughey
                  Robert B.Medz
                  Jeannie L. Parrish
                  Lawrence Plumlee

     Review  copies of this  document  also have been provided to other governmental agencies and to
industrial and public interest groups.

     All comments and criticisms have been reviewed and incorporated in the document where deemed
appropriate.
                                               IV

-------
                                    CONTENTS

                                                                              Page


LIST OF FIGURES	      ...                                   vi
LIST OF TABLES	       	        	'.'.'."".'"'....    vii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 	      	       	     	   vii
LIST OF CHEMICAL ELEMENTS AND COMPOUNDS   	   viii

1.   INTRODUCTION     	              	     1-1
    1.1  REFERENCE FOR SECTION 1	   1-1

2.   SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS	2-1
    2.1  SUMMARY  	             .        	2-1
    2.2  CONCLUSIONS	   2-3

3.   CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES    	      3-1
    3.1  REFERENCES FOR SECTION 3        .  .        	    3-1

4.   SAMPLING, PREPARATION, AND ANALYSIS   	   4-1
    4.1  SAMPLING PROCEDURES   	     	   4-1
         4.1.1 Air .  .        .         	         	   4-1
         4.1.2 Water  .       .  .            	       	    4-1
         4.1.3 Soil   	      	     	4-1
         4.1.4 Food  	        	      ....     4-2
    4.2  ANALYTICAL METHODS  ....         .   .       ...       ...         4-2
         4.2.1 Air .  .   .       	         	    4-3
         4.2.2 Water       ...       ....       	      4-3
         4.2.3 Soil   	      .       	     	   4-3
    4.3  REFERENCES FOR SECTION 4	       .  .   .    4-3

5.   ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL            	    5-1
    5.1  ORIGIN AND ABUNDANCE   ..           	                       5-1
         5.1.1 Natural Sources  . .     .     .  .    	       	      5-1
         5.1.2 Man-made Sources   .     ...     ...      .        	   5-2
    5.2  CONCENTRATIONS   .     . .           	    5-8
         5.2.1 Air	           	            .  .   5-8
         5.2.2 Water    	      . .         -  ...             -      -     .5-16
         5.2.3 Soil	         	        •   •            5-18
         5.2.4 Food     	     •       	     •    5-18
         5.2.5 Tobacco      	            •     5-21
    5.3  REFERENCES FOR SECTION 5        .                                     5-22

6.   ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE  . .     .            	       .         6-1
    6.1  HUMAN EXPOSURE AND INTAKE RATES  	         	   6-1
         6.1.1 Food	       •    •  • •          	      6-1
         6.1.2 Air	         • •           •      6-3

-------
                                                                                 Page

         6.1.3  Smoking   	   6'3
         6.1.4  Water	   6'3
         6.1.5  Soil	  6-4
     6.2  REFERENCES FOR SECTION 6	  6-4

7.    MECHANISMS OF EXPOSURE AND RESPONSE   	  7-1
     7.1  RESPIRATORY ABSORPTION	  7-1
     7.2  GASTROINTESTINAL ABSORPTION  	  7-1
     7.3  TRANSPORT AND DISTRIBUTION   	  7-1
     7.4  EXCRETION  	  7-3
         7.4.1  Urine  	  7-3
         7.4.2  Feces   	  7-3
         7.4.3  Hair  	  74
     7.5  BODY BURDEN	  74
     7.6  BIOLOGICAL HALF-TIME   	  7-4
     7.7  CONCLUSIONS  	   7-4
     7.8  REFERENCES FOR SECTION 7	  7-5

8.    EFFECTS  	   8-1
     8.1  HUMAN IMPACT	  8-1
         8.1.1  Respiratory Effects of Cadmium Exposure  	  8-1
         8.1.2  Systemic Effects of Cadmium Exposure  	8-1
         8.1.3  Clinical Studies   	      	  84
     8.2  ECOLOGICAL IMPACT	   8-6
     8.3  REFERENCES FOR SECTION 8	  8-9

9.    CONTROL TECHNOLOGY  	  9-1
     9.1  AIRBORNE EMISSIONS  	  9-1
     9.2  WATERBORNE EMISSIONS   	   9-1
     9.3  CONTROL METHODS	  9-1
         9.3.1  Control of Airborne Cadmium Emissions	  9-1
         9.3.2  Control of Waterborne Cadmium Emissions 	  94
     9.4  REFERENCES FOR SECTION 9	     9-5

     TECHNICAL DATA SHEET AND ABSTRACT  	  10-1


                                  LIST OF FIGURES

Figure                                                                            Page

5.1  Flowsheet of societal flow of cadmium in U.S., 1968   	       	      5-6
5.2  Cadmium concentrations (ng/m3) and isopleths for May 21-22, 1968         	5-12
5.3  Helena Valley Environmental Pollution Study: settleable particulate cadmium distribution  .     5-15
6.1  Cadmium concentrations of surface waters, soils, and foods and estimated dose levels resulting in
    various symptoms and effects in humans  ...      	   6-2
8.1  Environmental transport of cadmium        .        ....     .  .     	.8-7
                                          VI

-------
                                     LIST OF TABLES


Table                                                                                    page

5.1   Data on Natural Abundance of Zinc and Cadmium         .              	  5-1
5.2   Total and Recoverable Reserves and Resources of Zinc and Cadmium in the U.S. and the World  5-2
5.3   U.S. and World Production of Cadmium, 1964 to  1970        	       .  5-2
5.4   Summary of U.S. Zinc and Cadmium Producers       ...                .          ...     5-3
5.5   Operating Temperatures of Activities in which Zinc and Cadmium can be Released as Airborne
     Pollution	      .         	             .5.4
5.6   Estimated Cadmium Emissions to the Atmosphere in the U.S., 1968               .  .     .5-5
5.7   Estimated U.S. Emission Inventory for Cadmium, 1971           .            .              5-7
5.8   Anticipated Growth, by use, in Demand for Cadmium  in  the U.S., 1968-2000           ....  5-8
5.9   Quarterly  and Annual Average Cadmium Concentrations in Air of the 20 Most Populated U.S.
     Cities, 1969                  .   .           .            ....         ...          5-9
5.10 Quarterly  and  Annual Average Cadmium Concentrations at NASN Sites with Annual Average
     Concentrations Greater than 0.015 Mg/m3, 1969    	      	  5-10
5.11 Number of Stations within Selected Cadmium Concentration Intervals, 1966 Through 1969      5-11
5.12 Cadmium Concentrations in Ambient Air for Selected  Locations and Averaging Times      .     5-13
5.13 Particle  Size Distribution  of Cadmium in Airborne Particulate Matter                          5-14
5.14 Cadmium in Settleable Particulates in the Helena Valley               .   .       ..      .    5-14
5.15 Cadmium in Settled Particulates - Roadside Study      .     ...                           5-16
5.16 Deposition of Cadmium around an Emitting Factory, 1968 to 1970                           5-17
5.17 Zinc and Cadmium in  Municipal Water, Brattleboro, VT                                     5-17
5.18 Uptake of Cadmium by Rice and Wheat         .    .        .                            5-19
5.19 Cadmium Content in Different Food Categories in U.S.A.    .                ...         5-19
5.20 Cadmium in Selected  Foods in Various Countries                                           5-20
5.21 Metal Content of Tobacco Products                      .  .    ..                        5-20
5.22 Trace-Metal Content of Cigarette Fractions                                                5-21
6.1   Daily Intake of Cadmium VIA Food in  Different Countries                   .               6-1
7.1   -Average Cadmium Concentration in Renal Cortex by Age Groups in the United States       .    7-2
7.2   Mean Cadmium Concentrations in Renal Cortex at Age 50    .       .       .                7-3
8.1   Estimated Minimum Cadmium Levels Via Inhalation  or Ingestion Necessary for Reaching 200
     ppm (Wet Weight) of Cadmium in Renal Cortex (Total Body Burden: 120 mg Cadmium)
8.2   Concentration of Cadmium in Various Substances
                                LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
AAS               Atomic absorption spectrophotometry
acfm               Actual cubic feet per minute
AFS               Atomic fluorescence spectroscopy
ASV               Anodic stripping voltametry
°C                 Degrees Celsius
CD                Colorimetric dithizone
EPA               United States Environmental
                   Protection Agency
°F                 Degrees Fahrenheit
km                Kilometer
                                              Vll

-------
1                 Liter
Ib/ton             Pounds per ton
M_                Molar concentration
m                Meter
m3                Cubic meters
mg                Milligrams
mg/m3             Milligrams per cubic meter
min               Minutes
min-mg/m3         Time-concentration exposure or
   or              Exposure time in minutes times
mg/m3 -min        concentration in mg/m3
MX               Metric tons
Hg                Micrograms
Mg/m3             Micrograms per cubic meter
jug/ml             Micrograms per milliliter
/um               Micrometer
NAA              Neutron activation analysis
NASN             National Air Surveillance
                  Network
ng/m3             Nanograms per cubic meter
OES              Optical emission spectroscopy
ppb               Parts per billion
ppm              Parts per million
                   LIST OF CHEMICAL ELEMENTS AND COMPOUNDS
 B2042-
 Cd
 115Cd

 CdC03
 CdS
 co32-
 CdO
 CdSe
 CdS04
 CuFeS2

 HC03
 H20
 PbS
 Si032-
 S02
 S03
 ZnC03
 ZnO
 ZnS
 Zn2 Si04
 Zn4Si207(OH)2
 ZnS04
Metaborate
Cadmium
Cadmium isotope having
atomic weight of 115
Cadmium carbonate
Cadmium sulfide
Carbonate
Cadmium oxide
Cadmium selenide
Cadmium sulfate
Copper-iron sulfide
(chalcopyrite)
Bicarbonate radical
Water
Lead sulfide
Silicate
Sulfur dioxide
Sulfur trioxide
Zinc carbonate
Zinc oxide
Zinc sulfide
Zinc silicate (willemite)
Basic zinc silicate (hemimorphite)
Zinc sulfate
                                             Vlll

-------
                   SCIENTIFIC  AND  TECHNICAL

             ASSESSMENT  REPORT  ON CADMIUM
                               1.  INTRODUCTION


The purpose of this document is to summarize the current knowledge on cadmium in relation to its effect
upon human health and welfare. Cadmium in the Environment1  served as a basic reference for the review;
however, the results of later  studies and contributions from EPA staff members have been incorporated.
The references cited do not constitute a comprehensive bibliography on the subject.

Our knowledge concerning the cycling of cadmium in the environment is incomplete. Because the principal
human intake routes include food, water, and air, and because the half-time of cadmium in the human body
is very long, any assessment of effects should consider the environmental cycle. The atmosphere may serve
as a medium through which cadmium enters the soil and water,  and hence the food chain. This document
makes no attempt to treat this aspect of the subject in detail, but it  recognizes the possible impact upon
decisions concerning control strategies.

Each of the major human intake  routes for  cadmium is reviewed. Where justified by available evidence,
estimates have been made of normal and "critical" intake levels.

1.1 REFERENCE FOR SECTION  1

1. Friberg, L., M. Piscator,  G. Nordberg, and  T. Kjellstrom.  Cadmium in  the  Environment, II. The
  Karolinska  Institute,  Stockholm,  Sweden. Prepared for U. S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency,
  Research Triangle  Park, N. C.,  under  Contract No. 68-02-0342. Publication  No.  EPA-R2-73-190.
  February 1973. 169 p.
                                           1-1

-------
                        2.  SUMMARY  AND  CONCLUSIONS
2.1  SUMMARY
Cadmium is widely distributed in the environment in trace amounts. Concentrations exceeding fractions of
a part per million occur only in areas of rich ore deposits or in areas contaminated by man's activities.

Cadmium emitted into the atmosphere will generally be in the form of particles — usually as the oxide, but
also as sulfide or sulfate. The  primary man-made sources of cadmium released to the environment are
metallurgical processing, reprocessing of materials, incineration or other disposal processes, and consump-
tive uses.

Because   the  boiling  point of  cadmium  is  quite low  (767°C),  the  metal  may be  vaporized  in
high-temperature  processes and  condensed  into  particles  as  the  process  off-gases are cooled.  This
condensation would result in fine particulate matter, primarily in the micrometer and submicrometer range.
The exact size distribution of cadmium-containing particles from these  sources has not been clearly defined.
Available  data indicate that approximately 40 percent of the mass is in particles smaller than 2 micrometers
in diameter; hence, a large portion of the particles would be in the respirable range.

Evidence indicates that a considerable mass of cadmium-containing particles is deposited on the surface of
the earth at relatively short distances  from the emission source  — the maximum gradient is from 0 to 1
kilometer (0 to 0.6 mile), suggesting that large  particles are also emitted. The submicrometer particles,
however,  would be transported greater distances  -  detectable gradients up to 100 kilometers (60 miles)
have been reported.

In 1969,  atmospheric concentrations of cadmium at 29 nonurban stations in the U. S. were below the
minimum detectable level of 0.003 microgram per cubic meter (^g/m3). Cadmium is present in small but
measurable  amounts  in  the air over almost all urban  areas sampled by the National Air Surveillance
Network of EPA. Higher annual average concentrations of cadmium are found in the small-to-medium size
cities with heavy  industry than in the most  populous areas. The highest  24-hour, quarterly, and annual
values — 0.73, 0.15, and  0.12 jUg/m3 > respectively — were found in El Paso, Texas, where a known cadmium
source is  located. Average 24-hour concentrations of cadmium in urban areas are generally less  than 0.1
Mg/m3. In the immediate vicinity of major emission sources, average 24-hour concentrations may reach 5 to
6 /ug/m3. Annual averages of 0.3 /ug/m3  have been reported in Sweden.

The cadmium  content  of  surface water  is normally  less  than 1  part  per billion  (ppb).  However, a
concentration of 77 ppb has been found in hot, running tap water, which was attributed to cadmium in the
water pipe.

Cadmium values reported in  foods vary  widely;  however, the accuracy of many of  the  values are
questionable because of the  analytical methods used. Values  range from below detectable levels to several
parts per  million (ppm), depending upon the  type of food and the degree  of contamination. The varying
ability  of different species of plants to concentrate cadmium has not been explained. Tobacco, for example,
has been found to contain a high concentration of cadmium. The uptake of cadmium by wheat has been
related to the mount  of  cadmium added to the soil; however, the rate of uptake may be influenced by the
presence of other elements or compounds. Fertilization and harvest practices are suspected of contributing

                                               2-1

-------
to the  cadmium content in food; however, the relationship has not been conclusively demonstrated. The
role  of the  atmosphere in the transport of cadmium, with subsequent deposition  on the soil, is not
understood.  The majority  of food consumed in the United States is grown in areas remote from primary
cadmium emission sources.

Large doses of cadmium are known to be toxic. Some deaths have been reported as a result of exposure to
high concentrations  of cadmium  oxide fumes.  Acute pulmonary edema or proliferative  interstitial
pneumonitis may result from an acute exposure; the dose of cadmium necessary to  produce such reactions
has been calculated to be  approximately 2,500  minutes-milligrams per cubic meter (min-mg/m3). (This
could,  for example, represent an exposure to 100 mg/m3 for 25 minutes, or to 50 mg/m3 for 50 minutes).

Friberg found emphysema  of the lung among male workers chronically exposed to cadmium oxide dusts in
an  alkaline  accumulator  factory in  Sweden. Quantitative  data concerning the  exposure levels  were
incomplete;  however,  a range of 3  to 15 mg/m3 was reported. Several other incidents of lung damage
caused  by cadmium exposure have been reported. Little information is available, however, concerning the
possible association between respiratory diseases and exposure to cadmium via ambient air. Dose-response
relationships cannot  be established  at the present time because time-weighted  average exposures are
available for only short periods of time.

In fatal cases of acute cadmium poisoning via inhalation, pathological changes have  been found in the
kidneys. The relationship between the dose of cadmium and the degree of kidney damage is poorly defined,
however.

Microscopic  changes have been reported in the livers of workers suffering from acute cadmium poisoning as
a result of exposure to cadmium oxide fumes. Whether these changes represent a direct toxic effect of
cadmium on the liver or whether they are merely secondary to cadmium-induced pulmonary edema is not
known.

Long-term exposure to cadmium may cause renal tubular damage; "tubular proteinuria" is a major sign of
this  damage. The critical concentration of cadmium that may cause renal tubular dysfunction has been
estimated to be 200 ppm in the renal cortex.

Evidence  from  animal experiments  suggests  a  relationship  between cadmium exposure and  anemia,
hypertension,  testicular necrosis,  and carcinogenesis;  however, the evidence is not conclusive, and
dose-response relationships have not been established in humans. Studies have shown that the addition of
zinc, selenium, and sulfhydryl compounds may influence the effects of cadmium.

The body burden of cadmium is cumulative. The biological half-time is very long—over 10 years. Absorbed
cadmium is stored  mainly in the liver and kidney. The total body burden at age 50 varies considerably — 15
to 30 mg for people in some European countries and the United States; 50 to 60 mg in nonpolluted areas of
Japan.  The mean cadmium concentrations in renal cortex at age  50 is  reported as 25 to 50 ppm in some
European countries and the United States and 125 ppm  in Tokyo. A critical level for the renal cortex is
estimated at 200 ppm.

Minimum detectable health effects have  been theoretically associated with long-term (25  to 30 years)
exposure to air  concentrations of 2.5 Mg/m3, or long-term daily dietary intake of  300 Mg for the  average
man. The primary  sources  of cadmium intake for humans are food, tobacco smoke,  water, and ambient air.
The intake from breathing ambient air is small (about 1 percent) in comparison with food and tobacco,
except in the  immediate vicinity of  point sources. Present  estimates for some European countries, the
United States,  and Japan indicate that populations in areas not polluted by cadmium have a daily intake of
cadmium from food of 25 to 75 Mg.  It has been calculated that, with an absorption of 5 percent  of ingested
cadmium, the daily intake would have to be 88 Mg to reach the 50 ppm level in renal cortex in 50 years. To
reach the 200 ppm level, approximately 300  Mg would be required. Considerably less intake via food would
be required  for  smokers and those  living in  the immediate  vicinity of primary emission sources. Higher
absorption rates may be found for individuals with calcium deficiency.

2-2                                       CADMIUM

-------
2.2  CONCLUSIONS

Many uncertainties  remain regarding the  cycling of cadmium, the contribution of man's activities to the
redistribution of cadmium in the environment, and the effects upon human health and welfare. However, a
number of conclusions can be made, albeit some of these may best be classified as tentative.

   • Cadmium has a long biological half-time,  and its toxicity is high. Chronic effects may result from
     long-term exposures to lower  concentrations. The evidence  suggests that cadmium may act as a
     carcinogen in man, but it is not conclusive.

   • Of the three most important exposure routes  for cadmium, exposure via breathing ambient air is the
     least significant, except in the vicinity of point sources. The major route is via food intake. Smoking
     may be an additional means of exposure.

   • Transfer  mechanisms whereby cadmium enters food chains are not adequately described.

   • Detailed  information on absorption factors, biological half-time, renal concentrations, and total body
     burden as related to acute  and chronic health effects is lacking.

   • Atmospheric concentrations  approaching  a "critical exposure" level may occur in the immediate
     vicinity of point sources.

   • In general, current ambient atmospheric concentrations of cadmium do not pose a direct threat to the
     health and welfare of the general population; however, certain practices such as disposal of plastics
     and  other materials containing significant amounts of cadmium by incineration may tend to make the
     pollutant more ubiquitous.

   • Any action in pollution control that reduces particulate matter emissions will reduce the potential
     exposure to airborne cadmium; however, the degree of control with current technology is not known.
     Current technology is inadequate for capturing very fine particles.

   • Not enough is known regarding the cycling of cadmium and dose-response relationships to specify the
     degree of control required.

   • The atmospheric transport of cadmium  from primary emission sources, with subsequent deposition,
     will contribute  to cadmium contamination of soil; however, the degree  to which this mechanism
     contributes to cadmium  in  the general food supply of the United States is  unknown.  Evidence
     suggests  that  fertilizing and harvesting practices may be more important factors than  atmospheric
     transport.
                                  Summary and Conclusions                               2-3

-------
              3.  CHEMICAL AND  PHYSICAL PROPERTIES

Cadmium is chemical element number 48 and has an atomic weight of,l 12.40. It melts at 320.9°C and boils
at 767°C. Two and zero are its only stable valences.

The saturation vapor pressure of cadmium is so low that at room temperature less than 1 nanogram of
cadmium per cubic meter of air (1 ng/m3) is in the vapor phase when the metal and the atmosphere are in
equilibrium.1

Cadmium is a bluish-silver metal which retains its metallic luster even after tarnishing in the air. It is ductile
and easily worked.1'2

Cadmium is more chemically reactive than  mercury, which is below it on the atomic table, and less reactive
than zinc, which is above  it. It  is, therefore, intermediate in its behavior between mercury and zinc.3 It
readily forms alloys with a majority of the  heavy metals. It also forms a number of salts, the most common
of which is  cadmium sulfate. Cadmium sulfate is soluble in both cold and hot water.1


3.1  REFERENCES FOR SECTION 3

1. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics,  53rd Ed. Cleveland, Chemical Rubber Co., 1972. p. D-56;

2. Mineral Facts and Problems, 1970 Ed. U. S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Mines, Washington, D. C.
  Bulletin  No. 650. 1970.

3. Cadmium: The  Dissipated Element. Fulkerson,  W. and  H.  E.  Goeller (Ed.). Oak Ridge National
  Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn. 1973.
                                              3-1

-------
             4. SAMPLING,  PREPARATION,  AND ANALYSIS

The two major factors essential to obtaining reliable emission data are sampling procedures that provide
quantitatively  representative  samples  of the pollutant emissions and analytical methods that meet the
requirements for sensitivity, accuracy, and precision.  By  contract, EPA  has reviewed sampling and
analytical procedures for cadmium and developed a tentative procedure  for  sampling  cadmium from
stationary sources. The methods discussed below are based on an evaluation of available technical literature
but should be subjected to laboratory and field testing, with modification where necessary.

4.1  SAMPLING PROCEDURES

The problem of collecting representative samples is complicated by the multitude of source configurations
that exist. Cadmium is emitted  from both stack and diffuse sources. Because stacks constitute a relatively
well-defined source configuration, the possibility of obtaining reliable stack emission  data is much better
than in the  case of  diffuse sources. For stack  sources, EPA recommends a sampling train consisting of
probe, filter holder,  impingers,  and associated metering system for isokinetic sampling. The volume  flow
rate of stack effluents also must be obtained in order to derive pollutant  mass emission rates.  For diffuse
sources,  accurate emission data are virtually impossible to obtain by methods  currently  employed. The
usual  practice is to do sampling and analysis for ambient concentrations in the vicinity of such sources and
to use such  data in conjunction with estimated  rates of thermal diffusion, turbulent diffusion, deposition,
etc. to derive approximate emission rates.

Except in the case of continuous monitors, it is most convenient to consider environmental sampling and
analysis separately. Generally, the method of analysis is independent of the origin of the sample,  with
procedural differences consisting of variations in methods of sample preparation.

4.1.1  Air

Samples  are taken from ambient air by filtration through porous media of low,  known cadmium content
such as glass-fiber filters or membrane filters. The filter is held by a flexible gasket in a holder that is a part
of a  device made to exclude  debris, facilitate maintenance, regulate the time  of sampling,  and permit
estimation of the air volume. The sample of particulate matter so collected is prepared for  subsequent
analysis by  combustion (use  of a low-temperature  asher will eliminate loss of cadmium by volatilization)
and dissolution of cadmium  in  the residue  by  use of acids.2'3  Wet digestion with acids is also a reliable
technique.

4.1.2 Water

Water may be sampled by continuous withdrawal of a sample from a pipe or stream, but the more common
method is batch sampling.  Clean, acid-washed borosilicate  containers  should be used, and the  samples
analyzed as  soon as possible. When only one set of samples is to be taken from a stream or lake, it is best to
sample at the  middle  depth. Cadmium can be lost from solution in trace  quantities  by absorption  on
container walls, even those made of resistant glass.

4.1.3  Soil

Soil samples for cadmium are taken using a systematic method  such as sampling at points on a grid plotted
to cover  the area of  interest.  In general, a soil sample obtained from the top 12 inches  is thoroughly mixed
                                               4-1

-------
and reduced to a size suitable for analysis by using a riffle or the cone and quarter method; both reduce the
sample by discarding a portion in each operation. The sample is then ashed (preferably at low temperature),
and the cadmium is extracted with mineral acids of low cadmium content.
4.1.4  Food

Food samples may be taken as "market basket" samples, which are obtained" from normal supply channels
in the proportions representative of an average diet. Market basket survey samples are probably the best
index of average human ingestion. When the intake of individuals is surveyed, a fixed proportion of each
dish to be consumed by an individual is placed in a sample container for subsequent analysis-. Food samples
are ashed at low temperature, and the residue is extracted with acid to yield a solution suitable for analysis.


4.2 ANALYTICAL METHODS

Methods available for analysis of collected cadmium emission samples include atomic absorption, atomic
fluorescence, anodic stripping voltametry, ultraviolet and visible spectroscopy, polarographic procedures,
and titrimetric analysis. Multielemental techniques sometimes used are spark-source mass spectrography and
optical emission spectrography. X-ray fluorescence appears promising  as a rapid, accurate, nondestructive,
multielemental technique.

In  general, the  analytical methodology employed is determined by resource considerations and how the
data  are to be used. Potentially,  any method of analysis capable of  determining  cadmium in the
concentrations to be found in environmental samples should  be acceptable, but in practice the number of
methods in  extensive use has been  restricted to the classical procedures of colorimetric dithizone (CD),
optical  emission spectroscopy (OES),  neutron activation  analysis (NAA),  atomic absorption spectro-
photometry (AAS),   and  anodic  stripping voltametry (ASV). The  dithizone method consists of the
formation of a colored dithizone cadmium complex, separation  of interferents by  closely controlled
multiple extractions with various reagents, spectrophotometric determination of the colored complex, and
estimation  by reference to known  responses.  The  CD  method is slow, tedious, and requires excellent
technique, but gives reliable results.

The OES procedure uses expensive instrumentation and consists of exciting the cadmium atoms in a sample
by  electric arc  or spark, separation  of the emitted light that is  characteristic of cadmium by means of a
prism or grating, elimination of other lines by means of selective slits, and measuring the light intensity on
film or by phototube. The  line intensity is compared with the response from standards, and the cadmium
content is estimated. The  film approach  is semiquantitative, whereas the photometric procedure is more
quantitative.

The NAA approach involves irradiation of a sample with neutrons.  Cadmium is detected by identification
of  the radiation emitted by activated cadmium atoms;  chemical separation may be necessary to remove
interferents. NAA  costs,  comparatively,  are very  high, but the  sensitivity is good, and  the  accuracy
compares favorably with that of OES.

The AAS procedure  consists of exciting vaporized sample atoms in a  flame positioned  in the path of light
from a lamp that has a cathode made of the metal of interest - cadmium in this case. The cadmium atoms
in  the ground state  in the beam will absorb this characteristic radiation. The attenuation of light by the
sample  is compared with  that caused  by known cadmium  standards, and  the cadmium  content of the
sample  is estimated. Using a deuterium background corrector, atomic absorption spectroscopy meets the
requirements for sensitivity, accuracy, precision, ease of handling, speed, and relatively low-cost equipment.
AAS is the most  frequently used  analytical method and is rapidly becoming the accepted method to
determine cadmium at trace levels. The sensitivity of AAS can be increased by using dithizone as a chelating
agent1 or by using a heated graphite atomizer.

4-2                                       CADMIUM

-------
Interferences in  the analysis of cadmium by AAS have been reported3  to be caused by anions such as
B204~2, SjCV2, C03"2, and HCO3 .  Phosphate in concentrations above 0.1 molar (M) could decrease the
absorption,  and sodium chloride  above 0.01M could increase absorption.  These interferences can  be
removed, if necessary, by extraction of the cadmium into an organic solvent before analysis.

The  ASV method consists of measuring the current flow  per  unit time at varying voltages, which are
characteristic of the deposition of metals. Most of the cadmium  experience with ASV has been with blood
samples for which rapid, cheap, accurate results are claimed.

Atomic fluorescence spectroscopy has high sensitivity, but this method should be held in reserve until it is
more widely accepted.


4.2.1  Air

Cadmium  in  air  can  be estimated continuously by using an excitation source consisting of graphite rods
energized  by induction  with a radio-frequency coil. At present,  the sensitivity of the procedure does not
permit ambient air analysis, and  the equipment is too bulky and complex to be portable. The  method in
general use consists of examination of a solution obtained by processing  a particulate  matter sample on a
filter of glass fiber or organic membrane. The detection is by OES when a  multi-element survey is required:
AAS is used when cadmium values alone or data of high accuracy  are desired.

In the National  Air Surveillance Network, particulate matter samples are  sectioned,  and composites are
ashed in a low-temperature asher using 50 to 100 milliliters  (ml) of oxygen per minute at 1 torr2 with an
induction  coil energized with 250 watts. At this combustion  temperature (about 150°C) cadmium is
retained essentially quantitatively, whereas half of the cadmium in samples oxidized in a muffle furnace is
lost  at between  500  and 550°C.1 The residue is extracted using a mixture (4:1 by volume) of redistilled
nitric and hydrochloric acid and concentrated. The solution is  then freed  of silica by centrifugation and
brought up to volume with redistilled nitric acid. The solution  is analyzed directly by OES, which has a
detection limit of  0.3 microgram per miHiliter (jug/ml) of sample and a relative standard deviation of 8
percent at 0.8 Mg/ml- For special studies, this solution is diluted  10:1 with water prior to analysis by AAS.
The  minimum level detectable by AAS is 0.04 jug/ml,  and the standard relative deviation is 2 percent at or
above 0.5 yug/ml.

4.2.2  Water

Water samples are best analyzed directly by AAS, using the  graphite furnace technique. If interferents are
expected, the samples may  be taken to dryness, and the residue  digested  with nitric acid. If the cadmium
concentration is  not detectable, evaporation  or extraction with  a chelating agent and organic solvent will
serve  to concentrate the cadmium in  the  solution analyzed. Friberg et  al.4  describe measurement  of
cadmium in water very well.

4.2.3  Soil

Soil  samples, prepared for  analysis by  oxidation and  acid extraction, can be analyzed for cadmium  by
suitable techniques; AAS is the usual method  of choice.

4.3  REFERENCES FOR SECTION 4

1.  Martin, R. M. Construction Details  of Isokinetic Source Sampling Equipment. U. S. Environmental
   Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, N. C. Report No. APTD-0581, April 1971.

2.  Thompson, R.J., G. B. Morgan,  and L.  J. Purdue. Analysis of  Selected  Elements in  Atmospheric
   Particulate Matter by Atomic Absorption. Air Quality Instrum. 7:178, 1972.
                               Chemical  and Physical Properties                            4-3

-------
3. Kneip, T. J.,  M. Eisenbud, C. D. Strehlow, and P. C. Freudenthal. Airborne Particulates in New York
  City. J. Air Pollut. Contr. Assoc. 20:144-149, March 1970.

4. Friberg,  L., M. Piscator, and G. Nordberg. Cadmium in the Environment. Cleveland, Chemical Rubber
  Co. Press, 1971.
4-4                                      CADMIUM

-------
                       5.  ENVIRONMENTAL APPRAISAL

5.1    ORIGIN AND ABUNDANCE

5.1.1  Natural Sources

Cadmium, a relatively rare metal with an estimated abundance in the earth's crust of 0.55 gram per metric
ton, is always found in nature in association with zinc. It varies from 0.1 to 5 percent of the amount of zinc
present in zinc and polymetallic ores.1  Table 5.1 shows both the average terrestrial abundance and the
amounts in different types of rocks, soils, and sea water. The ratio of cadmium to zinc is based on 55 ppm
for the continental abundance of zinc and 0.15 ppm for cadmium. The continental abundance is based on
rocks that are predominantly granitic and contain larger amounts of cadmium.2



             Table 5.1. DATA ON NATURAL ABUNDANCE OF ZINC AND CADMIUM2
Type source
Worldwide
Continental

Ultramatic rocks
Basaltic rocks
High-calcium granites
Low-calcium granites
Syenitic rocks
Avg. igneous rocks
Shales
Sandstone
Limestone
Soil
Range
Average
Seawater5
Abundance, ppm
Zinc
80
55

150
112
47
39
26
70
45-95
16
20

10-300
50
0.01
Cadmium
0.18
0.15
0.53'4
0.0
0.22
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.2
0.3
0.05
0.035

0.01-0.7
0.06
0.0001
Specific zinc/
average zinc3
1.46
1.00

2.73
2.04
0.85
0.71
0.47
1.27
0.82-1.72
0.29
0.36

0.2-5.4
0.9
Cd/Zn,
%
0.23
0.27


0.20
0.28
0.33
0.50
0.27
0.67-0.32
0.31
0.17

0.1-0.23
0.12
1.0
 Abundance for specific rock type/continental abundance.
Assuming these two abundance values, the topmost 2 kilometers of the continental lithosphere contain on
the order of 40 trillion  tons of zinc  and 100 to 200 billion tons of cadmium. Ah1 of the oceans contain!
roughly 15  billion tons of zinc and 150  million  tons of cadmium.2 Economically, it is possible to recover
only small amounts of these reserves.  Known U. S. and  world reserves  and potential resources of zinc and
cadmium are given in Table 5.2.
                                              5-1

-------
            Table 5.2. TOTAL AND RECOVERABLE RESERVES AND RESOURCES OF
                      ZINC AND CADMIUM IN THE U.S. AND THE WORLD2
                                            (103MT)

Zinc
Reserves, measured and indicated
Reserves, inferred
Total reserves
Potential resources
Total reserves and resources
Cadmium
Reserves, measured and indicated
Reserves, inferred
Total reserves
Potential resources
Total reserves and resources
Total in resources
U.S.

15,500
15,100
30,600
56,400
87,000

95
91
186
•v195
^381
World

112,000
-^97,000
^209,000
-v 336,000
'^545,000

712
-v730
•v/ 1,442
M,800
-v3,242
Recoverable3
U.S.

12,000
11,600
23,600
43,400
67,000

54
51
105
M05
'V210
World

86,000
•W5,000
^161,000
'V259,000
-^420,000

400
'WHO
-V810
M,020
-v 1,830
 Based on Bureau  of Mines estimates of  77 percent of zinc and 56 percent of cadmium in ore; higher percentages,
 especially for zinc recovery in the U. S. CV86 percent), are thought to be currently more appropriate.


Cadmium and zinc occur in ore deposits principally as sulfides. Ores in  the eastern United States are purer
zinc ores;  those west  of the  Mississippi River are chiefly mixed  sphalerite—galena-chalcopyrite  (ZnS-
 PbS-CuFeS2)ores.2

5.1.2  Man-made Sources

5.1.2.1 Stationary Sources—The principal industrial sources that release  cadmium into the environment are
the primary metals industry, including mining and processing; waste disposal by incineration; fertilizer
processing;  and the burning of  fossil fuels. Metallic cadmium is prepared commercially as a by-product of
primary metal industries, principally the zinc industry. Cadmium is found not only in zinc ore, but in lead,
copper, and other ores  that contain zinc minerals. During  ore separation, cadmium remains with the zinc.
Because the separation processes are not complete, lead concentrates will contain small amounts of zinc and
smaller amounts  of cadmium. The U.  S. and world production of cadmium for the period 1964 to 1970 is
shown in Table  5.3. The producers of zinc and cadmium in the United  States are listed in Table 5.4.
             Table 5.3. U. S. AND WORLD PRODUCTION OF CADMIUM, 1964 TO 19704
                                             (103 kg)
Year
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
United States
4,743
4,387
4,745
3,946
4,831
5,736
4,445
World
12,704
11,907
13,002
12,827
14,076
17,049
15,600
5-2
CADMIUM

-------
                 Table 5.4. SUMMARY OF U. S. ZINC AND CADMIUM PRODUCERS4'5
Rank in
primary
zinc
output
1

2

3







4
5
6
7
8

9
10
11













Producer
St. Joseph Lead Co.a

New Jersey Zinc Co.a

American Smelting & Refining Co.







The Anaconda Co.
American Smelting & Refining Co.
The Bunker Hill Co.
Blackwell Zinc Co.
The Eagle Pitcher Co.a

National Zinc Co.
Athletic Smelting & Refining Co.
International Smelting & Refining Co.
Sherwin Williams Co.
Apex Smelting Co.
Arco Die Cast Metals Co.
W. J. Bullock, Inc.
General Smelting Co.
Gulf Reduction Co.
H. Kramer Co.
Pacific Smelting Co.
Sandoval Zinc Co.
Superior Zinc Co.
Wheeling Steel Corp.
Arkansas Metals Co.
United Refining & Smelting Co.
Location
Josephtown, PA
Herculaneum, MO
Palmerton, PA
Depue, IL
Amarillo, T X
Corpus Christi, TX
Selby, CA
El Paso, TX
Denver, CO
Beckenmeyer, IL
San Springs, OK
Trenton, NJ
Anaconda, MT
Hillsboro, IL
Kellog, ID
Blackwell, OK
Henryetta, OK
Galena, KS
Bartlesville, OK
Fort Smith, AR
Tooele, UT
Coffeyville, KS
Chicago, IL
Detroit, Ml
Fairfield, AL
Bristol, PA
Houston, T X
El Segundo, CA
Torrance, CA
Sandoval, IL
Bristol, PA
Martins Ferry, OH
Jonesboro, AR
Chicago, IL
Primary
cadmium
producer
X

X
X

X








X
X

X
X















 aThese companies also produce major quantities of zinc pigments and compounds directly from ore at eight plants.


Cadmium and zinc are released into the environment either through volatilization or through washing and
solubilization. Volatilization  occurs at quite low temperatures (cadmium 767°C and zinc 907°C) so that
they are readily  released  by such thermal processes as ore  roasting, pyrosmelting, steel scrap melting,
incineration of wastes, and burning of fossil fuels.2 Activities through which cadmium can be released to
the air because of volatilization are listed in Table 5.5.
                                    Environmental Appraisal
5-3

-------
     Table 5.5. OPERATING TEMPERATURES OF ACTIVITIES IN WHICH ZINC AND CADMIUM
                       CAN.BE RELEASED AS AIRBORNE POLLUTION2


Activity
Galvanizing
Rolled zinc, melting
Diecasting (2500 psi)
Silver solders
Refuse incinerators
Zinc ore roasting
Brass ingot making
Lead slag fuming
Zinc ore sintering
Zinc ore smelting
Lead blast furnace
Copper converting
Steel scrap melting
Temperature

"C
425-460
445-510
500
650
810
920
1,000-1,100
1,100-1,150
1,200
1,300
1,400
1,200
1,670-1,700
°F
790-850
840-950
930
1,200
1,500
1,600
1,830-2,000
2,000-2,090
2,190
2,360
2,550
2,200
3,000-3,200
Approximate quantities, 1968,
MT
Zinc
435,000
45,000
508,000


1,000,000
295,000
73,000
530,000
530,000
-v73,000
<45,000
145,000
Cadmium
(204}a
(11)
(16)


5,900
(140)
45
3,200
450
-v45
<180
1,000
"Values in parentheses indicate approximate amounts of cadmium as impurities in zinc.
Release of cadmium  from washing and solubilization occurs from overburden, tailing piles, and ponds at
mines, slag heaps at smelters, residue piles at electrosmelters and refuse dumps, and from accidental releases
from  chemical and electroplating plants.2 Estimates made by Davis  and  Associates6  of the total annual
emissions of cadmium to the atmosphere in the United States from major  known source groups are shown
in Table 5.6. Cadmium  emissions to  the atmosphere  as the  result of  electroplating operations  were
estimated  to  be  negligible.  Another  tabulation  of cadmium  emissions, prepared by  the Standards
Development and  Implementation Division  of EPA,  is presented  in Table 5.7. It should be  clearly
understood that these emission  data are estimates and that  efforts to  obtain better  information should
continue.

Losses of cadmium to the environment at various stages in the societal flow of cadmium are poorly known.
For this reason, the estimates given in Figure 5.1 are very crude.

Output of cadmium from incinerator sources  may increase considerably  because of rapid growth in the use
of plastics. Cadmium compounds  are used as stabilizers as well as pigments in plastics. It is difficult to
estimate how much of a given  compound is used industry-wide because  of rapid changes in types and
amount used. Although the cadmium concentration of phosphate rock processed into fertilizer varies from
one source to another, it is usually greater than the natural abundance of the element.

More  data  are needed on the cadmium content in coal and  other fuels to obtain a better assessment of
cadmium release from the burning of fossil fuels. Coal combustion processes are potentially a significant
source of cadmium emissions, but  the magnitude  of the emissions is not yet clearly defined. If the 454
million metric tons (MT) (500 million tons)4  of bituminous coal burned in the United States during 1970
are assumed to have  had a cadmium  content of about  0.5 ppm, then the maximum possible cadmium
emissions from combustion  of this coal - assuming no controls - would be 245 MT (270 tons). This figure
is over 10 percent of the total  emissions from other sources listed in Table 5.6. The actual emissions of
cadmium from coal combustion  processes will depend upon the efficiency  of cadmium removal by control
5-4
CADMIUM

-------
devices treating the off-gases from the processes. Device efficiency varies from source to source. Moreover,
the stated efficiencies of devices  in use apply to their efficiency in collecting total particulate matter;
because a significant fraction of cadmium may be present in very fine particles that a're difficult to collect,
it is quite possible that the efficiency of these devices in removing cadmium may be well below  the total
design efficiency. It is clear, men,  that total combustion may be a significant source of cadmium, but that
additional investigation is required before a meaningful estimate can be made.


The principal uses of cadmium are as protective coatings (mainly by electroplating), as a paint pigment, as a
plastic stabilizer, and  in electrical storage batteries. Cadmium plating protects steel, iron, copper, and brass
from  corrosion. The estimated growth in demand projected by the Bureau of Mines1  (Table 5.8) suggests
that a large increase in the use of cadmium as a plastic additive will  occur. Smaller quantities of cadmium
are used  as alloying agents, in fungicides, pesticides, nuclear control elements, photography, and cathode
ray screens.
               Table 5.6. ESTIMATED CADMIUM EMISSIONS TO THE ATMOSPHERE
                                  IN THE UNITED STATES, 19686
                                            (kilograms)
                 Source category
                 Mining

                 Metallurgical processing
                   Cd separation
                     from ores

                 Reprocessing
                   Pigments
                   Plastics
                   Alloys
                   Batteries
                   Miscellaneous
                 Consumptive uses
                    Rubber tires
                    Motor oil
                    Fungicides
                    Fertilizers
                 Incineration or other
                  disposal processes
                    Plated metal
                    Radiators
                    Other
                 Total emissions
 Estimated
 emissions
      240

 950,000
    9,500
    3,000
    2,000
      200
      500
   15,200
    5,200
      830
      200
      410
    6,640
  900,000
  110,000
   86,000
1,096,000
2,068,080
                                    Environmental Appraisal
                             5-5

-------
                                                                                                 CONVERSION
                                                                                                                                      CONSUMPTION-FATE
                                                               EMISSIONS TO
                               DISSOLVED AND SUSPENDED
                              CADMIUM FROM ORE FLOTATION
                              PROCESS AND TAILINGS RUNOFF
                                                      SOIL
                                                    WATER
                                                         TOTAL EMISSIONS < 3,600,000
                                                                                                                                                           < 100 000
                                                                                                                                    ELECTROSTATIC
                                                                                                                                     PRECIPITATOR
o
>
o
2
MH
C
s
950,000
               WORLD ABUNDANCE
      ANNUAL DEMAND
      ECONOMIC RESERVE
      RESERVE DEMAND RATIO
      CRUSTAL ABUNDANCE
      SEA WATER ABUNDANCE
      TOTAL ABUNDANCE
                                                                                                                                                           \
                                                                                                                                    REMELTING
                                                                                                                              Cd PLATED AND GALVANIZED
                                                                                                                                    SCRAP STEEL
                                                                                                                                                           ^890,000
                                                                                                                                                        BURIED AS DUST
                                                                                                                                  INCINERATION OF
                                                                                                                               PIGMENTS AND PLASTICS
                                                                                                                                                ,230
     PERMANENT USE
 UNACCOUNTED AND DISCARD
       < 4,940,000
                                                                                                                              NATURAL OCCURRENCE AND
                                                                                                                              UNINTENDED DISPERSIONS
                                                                                                                                    FOSSIL FUELS
                                                                                                                           450,000,000 MT COAL AT 0.25 TO 2.0 ppm
                                                                                                                                   230,000 kg Cd
                                                                                                                              180,000,000 MT DIESEL AND
                                                                                                                               FUEL OIL AT 0.1 TO 0.5 ppm
                                                                                                                                   < 90,0001(g Cd
                                                                                                                                     130,000
                                                                                                                                     1,000,000
                                                                                                                                            5,200
         14,300 MT
         650,000 MT
         45
         0.15 ppm
         0.1 ppb
         91 x 10'0 MT
       FERTILIZER
2-20 ppm Cd IN SUPERPHOSPHATE
    AT ll.OOO.OOOMT/yr
                                                                                                                                            ,830
                                                                                                                                    MOTOR OIL
                                                                                                                                   CONSUMPTION
                                                                                                                                 0.48 ppm NATURAL Cd
                                                                                                                                    23.000
                                                                                                                                    230.000
               Figure  5.1.   Flowsheet of societal  flow  of cadmium  in U.S.
               indicated otherwise.)
                                                                            1968.2 (Quantities in  kilograms of metal unless

-------
            Table 5.7. ESTIMATED U.S. EMISSION INVENTORY FOR CADMIUM, 1971
Source category/source
 Estimated
emissions, kg
         Estimated
      emission factor
      Number of
       emitting
       facilities
Mining
   Mining

Primary metallurgical processing
   Zinc operations
   Lead smelting
   Copper smelting
   Cadmium units

Metallurgical reprocessing
   Reclaiming of steel scrap
   Secondary copper operations
   Secondary zinc operations

Reprocessing
   Plastic stabilizers
   Pigments
   Alloying
   Other

Disposal
   Municipal incineration
   Sewage sludge incineration

Other sources
   Consumption of coal"
    Coal-fired  power plants
    Coke  ovens
    Industrial  and commercial
      boilers
   Consumption of diesel and
    heating oils

Consumption of rubber tires

Limited information  sources
   Processing of phosphate rock
   Secondary cadmium recovery
    operations
   Consumption of gasoline
     320
 584,200
 148,000
 212,000
  54,400
  70,800
  59,000
  19,000
   3,000
   6,400
   1,100
     450
  44,000
 125,000
  73,000
  34,000
  18,000

  54,000


   5,170
0.01 kgCd/MTCd mined


155 kg Cd/MT Cd input
490 kg Cd/MT Cd input
900 kg Cd/MT Cd input
 15 kg Cd/MT Cd input


0.001 kg Cd/MT scrap
2 kg Cd/MT auto radiators
0.007 kg Cd/MT Zn produced
3 kg Cd/MT Cd charged
8 kg Cd/MT Cd charged
5 kg Cd/MT Cd charged
1 kg Cd/MT Cd charged
500 kg Cd/MT Cd incinerated
500 kg Cd/MT Cd incinerated
500 kg Cd/MT Cd burned
750 kg Cd/MT Cd burned
500 kg Cd/MT Cd burned

1000 kg Cd/MT Cd  input
100 kg Cd/MT Cd impurity
        100
          9
          6
         15
          8
        160
       <50
         12
          3
          8
      Unknown
      Unknown
        197
        190
        750
        65
     Unknown

Vlobile and unknown
  stationary

      Mobile
        Total estimated kg/year: stationary  1,479,840; mobile - 32,000; combined - 1,511,840
 Derived from emission factors in Ib/ton by multiplying by 0.5 to convert to kilograms per metric ton.
 Based on 0.5 ppm cadmium content in coal and no control of emissions.
                                  Environmental Appraisal
                                                       5-7

-------
                     Table 5.8.  ANTICIPATED GROWTH, BY USE, IN DEMAND
                       FOR CADMIUM IN THE UNITED STATES, 1968-20001


Application
Electroplating:
Motor vehicles
Aircraft and
boats
Other
Subtotal
Plastics
Pigments
Batteries
Other
Total
1968

103MT

0.59
0.36

2.68
3.63
1.13
0.68
0.18
0.42
6.04
%of
total

9.8
6.0

44.4
60.2
18.7
11.3
3.0
6.9
100
2000

103MT

2.04
0.59

4.50
7.13
4.10
1.13
0.68
0.68
13.72
%of
total

14.9
4.3

32.8
52.0
29.9
8.2
5.0
5.0
100

% increase
1968-2000

245
64

68
96
263
66
277
62
127
 5.1.2.2 Mobile Sources-The  available data concerning the emissions of cadmium directly from motor
 vehicles are limited. lungers et al.7  reported that the levels of cadmium in 22 samples of premium gasoline
 ranged from < 0.001 to 0.03 Mg/mL In 22 samples of regular gasoline, the cadmium concentration was less
 than  0.08 /ug/ml; in six samples of low-lead  gasoline, it was less  than  0.04 jug/ml.7 These values were
 obtained by the isotope dilution spark source mass spectrometry, an analytical technique that provides
 great  precision and accuracy.

 5.2   CONCENTRATIONS

 5.2.1 Air

 Cadmium emitted into  the air from numerous  and  varied sources is associated with particles ranging from
 submicrometer to possibly 100 micrometers or greater in diameter. The retention time of these particles in
 the air depends on particle  size,  wind factors,  and other  physical and meteorological parameters. The
 smaller particles may remain  suspended indefinitely, whereas the larger ones settle out immediately and are
 deposited on  various surfaces. The greatest research effort has been  expended on studies of suspended
 cadmium, although a number of investigations directed at cadmium deposition have been carried out.

 5.2.1.1  Cadmium in Suspended Paniculate Matter

 5.2.1.1.1 National Air Surveillance Network Studies-Sines  1957, ambient air concentrations of cadmium
 collected in suspended particulate matter samples at some 300 urban and  30 nonurban NASN  sites
 distributed  over the United  States have  been  determined.  Because of relatively  low sensitivity,  the
 spectrographic method  of analysis  was unable to  determine the low ambient cadmium concentrations
 prevailing in the majority of cities. Thus, the data base is not adequate for determining the long-term trend
 for cadmium. In recent years, analytical methodology has been improved to the extent that data for a large
 number of sites are now available. The 1969 data representing the maximum number of NASN sites provide
 the most comprehensive base  for  demonstrating the distribution  of cadmium in  the atmosphere. The
 quarterly and annual average  concentrations in the  air of the 20 most populous cities are shown in Table
 5.9. Table 5.10 provides the same kind of information, plus the percentage of cadmium in the particulate
5-8
CADMIUM

-------
        Table 5.9. QUARTERLY AND ANNUAL AVERAGE CADMIUM CONCENTRATIONS3
                    IN AIR OF THE 20 MOST POPULATED U.S. CITIES, 1969
                                               3)
City
New York City, NY
Chicago, IL
Los Angeles, CA
Philadelphia, PA
Detroit, Ml
Houston, TX
Baltimore, MD
Dallas, TX
Washington, DC
Indianapolis, IN
Cleveland, OH
Milwaukee, Wl
San Francisco, CA
San Diego, CA
San Antonio, TX
Boston, MA
Memphis, TN
St. Louis, MO
New Orleans, LA
Phoenix, AZ
Quarterly average
1
0.017
0.015
0.006
0.010
0.011
<0.003b
0.011
0.005
0.010
0.005
0.012
0.006
0.005
0.007
0.003
0.007
0.003
0.013
0.004
0.005
2
0.023
0.014
0.006
0.014
0.015
0.005
0.010
0.003
0.006
0.020
0.024
0.017
<0.003
0.012
<0.003b
0.008
0.004
0.060
0.004
0.005
3
0.004
0.015
0.006
0.020
0.014
0.005
0.008
0.004
0.007
0.025
0.015
0.010
<0.003
0.015
0.003
0.005
0.003
0.041
0.005
0.005
4
0.011
0.015
0.006
0.015
0.010
0.005
0.017
0.008
0.008
0.011
0.008
0.008
0.006
0.006
0.003
0.004
0.005
0.031
0.004
0.009
Annual
average
0.014
0.015
0.006
0.015
0.012
0.004
0.011
0.005
0.008
0.015
0.015
0.010
c
0.010
0.003
0.006
0.004
0.036
0.004
0.006
aMinimum detectable concentration (MDC) = 0.003 ng/
bMDC/2 used for computation of annual averages.
clnsufficient data to permit computation.
                                  Environmental Appraisal
5-9

-------
matter for those cities with annual average concentrations greater than 0.015 Mg/m3. The quarterly values
could reflect any seasonal differences that might be attributed to fuel used for domestic heating. The
annual average concentrations are of use in evaluating  long-range exposures. All cities in  the  first table
(except St. Louis, which appears in both) have annual averages of 0.015 Mg/m3 or less. This indicates that
some of the highly  industrialized smaller cities can have high levels of some pollutants. A review of all
available cadmium data uncovered the fact that El Paso, Tex., had the highest 24-hour average recorded,
0.73 Mg/m3 in 1964; the highest quarterly average, 0.150 Mg/m3 in 1969; the highest annual average, 0.120
Mg/m3 in  1964; and the highest percentage of cadmium in the particulate sample, 0.07 percent in 1969.
These high values are probably attributable to emissions from a large lead smelter located  in the area. In
 contrast, cadmium levels in 1969 at the 29 active nonurban stations were below the minimum detectable
 concentration (0.003 Mg/m3).
       Table 5.10.  QUARTERLY AND ANNUAL AVERAGE CADMIUM CONCENTRATIONS AT
              NASN SITES WITH ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATIONS GREATER
                                   THAN 0.015 Mg/m3, 19698
City
Denver, CO
Waterbury, CT
E. St. Louis, IL
E. Chicago, IN
Ashland, KY
St. Louis, MO
Helena, MT
Elizabeth, NJ
Newark, NJ
Perth Amboy, NJ
Cincinnati, OH
Allentown, PA
Bethlehem, PA
El Paso, TX
Quarterly average, Mg/m3
1
0.022
0.008
0.045
0.017
0.022
0.013
0.077
0.009
0.015
0.024
0.016
0.011
0.022
0.083
2
0.015
0.029
0.013
0.046
0.017
0.060
0.004
0.029
0.014
0.020
0.017
0.023
0.029
0.150
3
0.018
0.020
0.016
0.027
0.026
0.041
0.005
0.018
0.024
0.017
0.019
0.028
0.015
0.057
4
0.019
0.023
0.015
0.024
0.026
0.031
0.026
0.013
0.099
0.011
0.013
0.017
0.027
0.130
Annual
average,
M9/m3
0.018
0.020
0.022
0.028
0.023
0.036
0.028
0.017
0.038
0.018
0.016
0.020
0.023
0.105
Cadmium
in particulate
matter, %
1.3
2.4
1.8
1.5
1.3
1.7
4.8
2.3
5.1
2.3
1.4
1.9
2.6
7.0
 NASN sites listed alphabetically by state.

5-10
CADMIUM

-------
Table 5.11  presents a summary of cadmium data from both urban and nonurban NASN stations collected
after  1965  when the low-temperature sample  ashing  procedure that  prevents  loss of cadmium by
volatilization was adopted. For each of the years (1966 through 1969), the annual cadmium averages from
all the sites are  categorized into four concentration intervals. The table illustrates that even though the
number of  sites has increased  over the time period, the cumulative percentage (percentage of sites in that
interval or  below) within an interval by year has remained  essentially the same. The table, however,  does
not indicate the number of stations (estimated to be at least  50 percent) with cadmium below the minimum
detectable concentration. No strong evidence indicates a long-term trend in the cadmium data.
                Table 5.11. NUMBER OF STATIONS WITHIN SELECTED CADMIUM
                     CONCENTRATION INTERVALS, 1966 THROUGH 19698
Number and per-
cent of sites
1969
Number
Percent
1968
Number
Percent
1967
Number
Percent
1966
Number
Percent
Concentration interval, jLig/m3
<0.010

169
81

175
98

119
90

116
91
0.011-0.020

31
15

2
1

7
6

7
5.5
0.021-0.030

5
2.5

2
1

2
1.5

3
2.5
>0.030

3
1.5

0
0

5
2.5

1
1
Total

208
100

179
100

133
100

127
100
 5.2.1.1.2  Chicago and northwest Indiana study-During the period May through August 1968, Winchester
 and Harrison9  conducted a special study of the areawide distribution of heavy metals in Chicago and
 northwest Indiana. Six sets of 24-hour suspended particulate samples collected at 22 sites in Chicago and at
 15 industrial and 11  other sites in northwest Indiana were analyzed for lead, copper, and cadmium. Figure
 5.2 shows the  concentration for each Chicago  site  on May 21 and for Indiana sites on May 22, and the
 corresponding isopleths. Although this represents only one day, it may provide a clue to the distribution of
 trace metals in the air over a densely populated, highly industrialized area and the influence of concentrated
 sources on pollutant levels over a large urban area.

 5.2.1.1.3 Miscellaneous  studies-Many  special  studies have  been  directed  at  the  definition  of the
 atmospheric burden of cadmium.10"12 Some were designed to detect the influence of specific sources on
 the cadmium levels  in  the  immediate area. The results (Table  5.12) clearly  show the contributions of
 cadmium-emitting industries in East Helena, Mont., Sweden, and Japan.

 5.2.1.2  Size  Distribution of Particulate  Cadmium13'14-Knowledge  of the particle size distribution of
 cadmium-containing suspended particulate matter is  essential to an evaluation of  the human intake by the
 respiratory route. Research on the subject has been limited primarily because  of the problems associated
 with analysis for the  very minute amount of cadmium present in  each particle size fraction collected by
 available equipment. A summary of results obtained by Lee and coworkers in  Cincinnati and St. Louis is
 presented in Table 5.13.
                                   Environmental Appraisal
5-11

-------
21 MAY 1968 22 MAY 1968
(TUESDAY) \ j (WEDNESDAY)
^-'"+ND"9J \
-> ' 30 1
'30 + >
40 (
|ND 5p V
~1 if"
CHICAGO j 80 \
' / ' ' \
30- + 2f 3^l

LAKE MICHIGAN


iW 10 yo-
|+ . E(lV
?-l , ••h-vi°A
             11 ""'-t 3-°  ? llO 115 •?°+^o'^>——
                   	» -t-—"-i 70+   An   '7
                ILLINOIS
  •|7.0+   -30  _j

  L-,     •  r-
--»!    ••—i    '
10     H
             GARY

              ND
                            INDIANA
          10km
                                       10
                                                                  MICHIGAN CITY
                                                                  MICHIGAN CITY
                 ILLINOIS    INDIANA
     Figure 5.2.  Cadmium concentrations (ng7m3) and isopleths for May 21-22, 1968.


5-12                                   CADMIUM

-------
                 Table 5.12. CADMIUM CONCENTRATIONS IN AMBIENT AIR FOR
                        SELECTED LOCATIONS AND AVERAGING TIMES
Location
Tuxedo, NY10
Sweden11
Stockholm, Sweden11
Manhattan, NY10
Bronx, NY10
Helena, MT12
East Helena, MT12
Sweden11
Japan, City 111

Japan, City 211
Site
Rural
Rural
Center City
Urban
Urban
Urban
Industrial
(Pb smelter)
Industrial
(Cd alloy)
Near zinc
smelter

Near zinc
smelter
Concentration,
,ug/m3
0.003
0.0009
0.005
0.023
0.014
0.03
0.06-0.29
0.7
0.6
0.3
5.4
0.5
0.2
0.16-0.32
Averaging
time
Annual
Month
Week
Annual
Annual
"Several weeks "
24-hr (max)
"Several weeks "
24-hr (max)
Month
Week
24-hr (max)
Week (of 8-hr
values)
Week (of 8-hr
values)
Week (of 8-hr
values)
Source
distance, meters





7,000
800-1,300
800
100
500
100
400
500
The limited available  data indicate that a substantial portion of urban particulate cadmium occurs in the
respirable size range (< 3.5 /urn aerodynamic diameter).

5.2.1.3  Cadmium  in Settled Particulate (Dustfallj—Most of the particles  emitted  into the atmosphere
eventually settle out and are deposited on soil, water, roadways, building roofs, and other surfaces. The
fallout rate is dependent on particle size, density, and wind conditions. Thus, when particles containing
cadmium settle out of the air, they contribute either directly or indirectly to the cadmium content of soil
and surface waters. Consequently, data on deposition of cadmium should be of value in any study relating
to the environmental aspects of that element.

5.2.1.3.1 Helena Valley, Montana, Area Environmental Pollution Study12 —A study was conducted in the
Helena Valley during the summer and fall of 1968 to define the extent of pollution in a valley with a large
lead smelter and a zinc recovery plant. As part of the study,  settled particulate samples were collected
monthly at six sites and subsequently analyzed for cadmium. The results, summarized  in Table 5.14  and
illustrated in  Figure 5.3, show that sites 3 and 6, situated nearest the smelter stack, had consistently higher
cadmium fallout.
                                   Environmental Appraisal
5-13

-------
                   Table 5.13. PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF CADMIUM IN
                            AIRBORNE PARTICULATE MATTER13'14

Ambient concentration,
M9/rn3
MMDa, jum
Percent <3.5 /im
Percent <2 ,um
Percent <1 jinn
Cincinnati
Business
1966
0.08
3.1
45
40
25
Suburban
1967
0.02
10
45
40
20
St. Louis
Business
1970
0,01
1.5

65
28
 MMD—Mass median diameter (the median diameter of suspended particles aerodynamically determined with reference to
 spheres of unit density). Fifty percent of the mass is represented by particles with diameters > MMD, and 50 percent of
 the mass is composed of particles < MMD.
                    Table 5.14.  CADMIUM IN SETTLEABLE PARTICULATES IN
                                    THE HELENA VALLEY12
                                           (mg/m2-mo)
                                               Station and location
Month
June
July
August
September
October
ib
1.3 km; 34°
0.0
0.5
0.2
0.5
0.5
2
4.0 km; 105°
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.4
3
0.6 km; 11 2°
2.0
3.0
1.6
1.2
1.5
4
7.2 km; 274°
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
6b
0.8 km; 2°



2.2
3.2
 Distance and direction from lead smelter stack immediately south of East Helent,; degrees are computed from north side
 of stack in clockwise direction.

 Sites 1 and 6 located in East Helena (Figure 5.3).
5-14
CADMIUM

-------
           >  1 to<4


           SAMPLING STATION LOCATION
                                    N
                                   .
                                         012345
                                         I    1   '    '    •    1
                                                   km
     Figure  5.3.  Helena  Valley Environmental  Pollution  Study:  settleable particulate
                            12
     cadmium distribution.
In the final report of the study, it was concluded that 1 to 4 mg Cd/m2-mo was deposited within a 1.6-km
radius of the  smelter and 0.1 to 1 mg/m2-mo  over an area of 150 km2. No data relative to wind direction
during the study  are included  in the report. For a S-year period (1949 to 1954) the prevailing wind was
from  the  west (W-18 percent, WNW-14 percent, WSW-13 percent). Consequently, it is not possible to
explain the data on the basis of meteorological conditions prevailing during the study.

5.2.1.3.2.  Roadside study-Creason  and coworkers,15  in an attempt to determine if motor vehicles are
sources of trace metal pollutants, determined the cadmium, lead, and zinc content of settled particulate
samples collected  monthly at four sites in Cincinnati, Ohio,  in July, August,  and September 1968 (Table
5.15). Samples were collected at distances of 7.6 and 30.5 meters (m) (25 and 100 feet) from the roadway
at each site.

In this study, the cadmium fallout did not prove to be substantial, and the amount deposited at 30.5 m was
only slightly less than that at 7.6 m, a distribution which could possibly indicate fairly uniform and  small
particle size and wind turbulence. Although it  has been established that some cadmium is injected into the
air as  a result of wear of automobile tires, which contain small amounts of this element, the data obtained
in this study were not suitable for use as a measure of the contribution from this source.
                                   Environmental Appraisal
5-15

-------
           Table 5.15. CADMIUM IN SETTLED PARTICULATES - ROADSIDE STUDY15
                                          (mg/m2-mo)
Site
Industrial
Residential
Suburban
Suburban /
commercial
Distance
from
road, meters
7.6
30.5
7.6
30.5
7.6
30.5
7.6
30.5
Month
July
0.084
0.073
0.080
0.067
0.085
0.067
0.061
August
0.054
0.046
0.023
0.023
0.061
0.046
0.252
September
0.076
0.118
0.077
0.077
0.061
0.046
0.069
0.026
5.2.1.3.3 The 77-city study-^ Hunt and coworkers,16 in September through December 1968, conducted a
study of the trace-metal content of settled particulates collected at residential, commercial, and industrial
sites in each of 77 midwestern cities. Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas with more than 1 million or
less  than  100 thousand  people  were excluded. The  investigators  reported  geometric mean cadmium
deposition (mg/m2-mo) for all cities as a  group: residential 0.040, commercial 0.063, and industrial 0.075.
The  purpose  of  this  study  was  to examine a possible relationship between cadmium, lead, and zinc
pollution and  cardiovascular disease;  however, careful analysis of  the cadmium  fallout  data failed  to
uncover any significant relationship.

5.2.1.3.4 Swedish study—Olofson, cited in Friberg et al.11  measured deposition of cadmium emitted from
a Swedish factory (Finspong Plant) at the rate of 460 kg/month. Samples were collected at  different times
at seven sites located around the plant during one or more years in the period 1968 to 1970.

The  results of this study  (Table  5.16) dramatically illustrate  the impact of a single major source on the
quality of the surrounding environment. The cadmium fallout from this source contributed substantially to
the pollutant burden of the surrounding area.


5.2.2 Water

The soluble cadmium content  of natural waters  is  low. The  major portion will be  found in suspended
particles and in the bottom sediments. In water considered not to be polluted by cadmium, concentrations
of less than 1 Mg/liter (ppb) have been  reported. In samples  from a site 500  meters downstream from a
cadmium-emitting factory, the  cadmium  content of the water was found to be 4 ppm, while  the bottom
sediments contained 80 ppm (dry weight).11

The proposed U. S. interim  drinking water standard (1975) for cadmium  is 10 jug/liter (0.01 ppm). The
average cadmium concentration in main  streams  and lakes draining  16 major U.  S. watersheds  was 9.5
;ug/liter as measured from  1962 to 1967.17

A number of studies have shown mat the cadmium  concentration of municipal water systems varies from
the inlet valves to the  outlet  taps with the latter being  the higher. The increase has been attributed to the
cadmium content in the pipes. The cadmium content in galvanized iron pipe has been reported as 360 ppm;
 5-16
CADMIUM

-------
polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe  contains  from 0.2 to 2.0 ppm cadmium. The variation in  the cadmium
content of the water is apparently dependent upon the pH and temperature of the water and the residence
time in the pipe. Increases in the pH and/or carbonate concentration resulted in lower levels of cadmium.
Results of a study by Schroeder18 are shown in Table 5.17.
            Table 5.16.  DEPOSITION OF CADMIUM AROUND AN EMITTING FACTORY,
                                        1968 TO 197011

Direction
Number of years
Number of measure-
ments
Deposition, mg/m2-mo
Minimum
Maximum
Average
Distance from factory, km
0.1
S
3
10

4.0
40.0
16.7
0.3
NE
1
2

0.7
1.8
1.3
0.3
N
1
5

1.2
5.3
3.4
0.5
NNW
2
8

0.5
3.0
1.7
0.7
NE
3
10

0.4
4.0
1.3
1.0
sw
2
6

1.0
3.5
1.8
10.4
ENE
1
5

<0.03
0.7
0.3
In 2,595 community water samples analyzed  by the Bureau of Water Hygiene in 1969,19  the cadmium
content was found to exceed the mandatory limit in 0.2 percent of the samples.

A study by the U. S. Geological Survey (cited by Fulkerson2), in which 720 water samples were collected
from lakes and rivers throughout the  United  States and analyzed  for  the presence of various elements,
showed cadmium present in 42 percent of the samples. The range was from  0.001 to 0.01 mg/liter. The
general conclusion was that higher concentrations of cadmium in water are usually found in areas of high
population density.
                    Table 5.17. ZINC AND CADMIUM IN MUNICIPAL WATER,
                                    BRATTLEBORO, VT18
                                            (ppb)

Inlet
Spillway
Town water main
Cold running tap water
Stagnant - in pipes
Hot running tap water
Zinc
3.5
3.5

160
1830

Cadmium
2.1
2.5
14.0 to 21.0
8.3
15.0 to 77.0
21
                                  Environmental Appraisal
5-17

-------
5.2.3  Soil

The  amount of cadmium in soils, unless contaminated by human activities, is highly dependent upon the
underlying parent rock. Organic matter usually has a higher cadmium content than other soils.2 In soils not
known to be polluted by cadmium, concentrations of less than 1 ppm were reported.11 Bowen20 lists the
cadmium concentration of soil as being 0.06 ppm.

Analysis of the soil at  the  Virgin Islands Agricultural  Station18  revealed 3.38  ppm cadmium in soil
fertilized with phosphatic fertilizer but only 0.15 ppm in untilled and 0.8 ppm in tilled, unfertilized soil.

In the Helena, Montana, study,12 soil concentrations decreased with distance from the smelter complex:

           68 ppm at 1.6 km (1 mile)
           17 ppm at 3.2 km (2 miles)
            4 ppm at 6.4 km (4 miles)

Similar results have been found in Japan in the vicinity of emission sources.

Phosphate fertilizers contain  cadmium. Because of the  wide usage of phosphate fertilizers, cadmium could
be added to soil in this manner; however, because phosphates tend to precipitate cadmium, it would not be
available to plant or animal life  unless converted to a soluble form.2

Cadmium can  be added to the soil in sewage sludge.  Studies in Sweden  and England have reported the
addition of metals to soil in  this form. In Sweden, the median concentration of cadmium in sludge was 12
ppm dry weight; the range was from 2 to 61 ppm.21

Deposition of atmospheric particulates  in the vicinity of emission sources, water runoff from polluted
sources  (factories and mines), use of polluted water in irrigation, and fertilization with cadmium-containing
sewage sludge may all add to the cadmium content of soil.

5.2.4  Food

The  cadmium  concentrations in food, despite many studies and analyses, are  still subject to debate. The
mechanisms involved in the transport of cadmium from its primary sources into the physical environment
and then through the various pathways into the food chain are still not clear. In addition, the results of the
various studies are influenced by the following factors:

   • Varying ability of different species  of plants and animals to concentrate cadmium.

   • Accuracy of the data produced by the analytical methods used.

   • Possibility of sample contamination.

   • Interpretation of the data.

   • Regional  differences in soils in  which the food plants are grown and water  sources when plants are
     irrigated.

   • Processing through which the food  has passed.2 >n

Friberg et al.21  indicate that  foodstuffs  generally contain less than 0.05  ppm  cadmium (wet weight).
Marine organisms, such as shellfish, and the liver and kidney of calves or swine, however, may contain much
higher quantities of cadmium,  even in unpolluted areas. Rice  and wheat also tend to accumulate cadmium
to concentrations of more than 1 ppm in polluted areas (see Table 5.18).

5-18                                      CADMIUM

-------
                   Table 5.18.  UPTAKE OF CADMIUM BY RICE AND WHEAT2



Addition
of Cd
to soil.
% CdO
0
0.001
0.003
0.01
0.03
0.1
0.3
0.6
1.0

Rice

Cd, ppm

Yield,
%
100
100
92
92
93
69
32
19
1
Polished
(10%)
0.16
0.28
0.40
0.78
1.37
1.62
1.94
1.37
4.98a

Bran
0.59
0.79
0.84
1.60
2.68
2.94
3.19
3.94


Whole grain
wheat


Yield,
%
100
106
72
16
13
3
3
2
r
Cd,
ppm
0.44
8.27
15.5
29.9
41.4
60.7
48.6
90.8
139.0
Factors of increase in plant concen-
tration for each 10-fold increase
in soil
Rice


Polished


2.8

2.1

...



Bran


2.0

1.8






Whole grain
wheat


3.6

2.0

2.3


 Unpolished.

Cadmium levels in food samples collected from 1968 to 1970 from 30 markets in 24 different cities in the
United States are  shown in Table 5.19. Table 5.20 shows the  cadmium content of selected foods from
several different countries.
         Table 5.19.  CADMIUM CONTENT IN DIFFERENT FOOD CATEGORIES IN U.S.21


Type of food3
Dairy products
Meat, fish, and
poultry
Grain and cereal
products
Leafy vegetables
Legume vegetables
Root vegetables
Garden fruits
Fruits
Oils, fats, and
shortening
Sugar and adjuncts
Beverages
Potatoes
Cadmium, ppm wet weight
1968-1969
No. ^0.01
10
21

27

27
16
24
25
15
27

18
8

Maximum
0.09
0.06

0.08

0.08
0.03
0.08
0.07
0.38
0.13

0.07
0.04

1969-1970
No.>0.01
9
22

27

28
10
27
27
10
28

27
9
29
Maximum
0.01
0.03

0.06

0.14
0.04
0.08
0.07
0.07
0.04

0.04
0.04
0.08
      aTotal number of samples: 30.
       Analyzed by atomic absorption and/or polarography at sensitivity of 0.01 ppm.
                                 Environmental Appraisal
5-19

-------
       Table 5.20.  CADMIUM IN SELECTED FOODS IN VARIOUS COUNTRIES11
                                        (ppm wet weight)
Country
U.S.A.
Western
Germany
Czechoslovakia
Rumania
Japan (non-
polluted areas)
Potato
0.001
0.039
0.09
0.017
0.038
Tomato
0
0.015

0.013
0.032
Wheat flour
0.07
0.047
0.02

0.025
Milk
0.0015-0.004
0.009
0.01

0.003
In the comparison of concentration data from different countries, consideration should be given to the
location  of the  agricultural  area  in relation to the cadmium  emission  sources and the contamination
processes. The majority of the food consumed in the United States is grown in areas remote from primary
emission sources. Similar conditions do not exist in Japan.
Cadmium concentrations in U. S. oysters have been reported to range from 0.1 to 7.8 (jig/
the east coast and 0.2 to 2.1 jug/g on the west coast.22
                                          wet weight on
In general, it may be concluded that most foods, not from cadmium polluted areas, contain less than 0.05
jug/g of cadmium, wet weight.


5.2.5  Tobacco

Analyses of cigars, cigarettes, pipe tobacco, and  snuff reveal that tobacco  in these forms  contains
appreciable amounts of cadmium and  nickel. When tobacco is smoked, cadmium is  released  into the
mainstream and may be inhaled. Menden et al.23  found that American cigarettes have amounts ranging
from 1.56 to 1.96 jug per cigarette. Through the use of a smoking machine, which puffed 35-ml puffs for 2
seconds every minute,  the investigators found that the particulate phase of the mainstream contained 0.10
to 0.12 /ig per cigarette. A person who smokes a pack of cigarettes (20 cigarettes) a day inhales about 2 jUg
of cadmium per  day (see Table 5.21, and 5.22). The data presented in Table 5.22 suggest that 38 to 50
percent of the cadmium in smoked cigarettes is present in the sidestream. Cadmium, therefore, not only is
inhaled by the smoker but enters the air in the smoke from the sidestream (smoke from cigarette not drawn
in by smoker) and may be inhaled from there also.
5-20
CADMIUM

-------
              Table 5.21.  METAL CONTENT OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS
                                                                     23

Kentucky reference
cigarettes (KR)
Commercial brand
cigarettes (CB)
Batch 1
Batch 2
Metal content,3
;itg/cigarette
Cadmium
1.56±0.19
(6)c
1.90±0.14
(4)
1.96±0.11
(4)
Nickel
4.25±0.18
(2)

7.55±0.15
(4)
Zinc
33.4± 2.4
(7)
38.9± 9.0
(4)
20.0± 0.8
(4)
Values are mean ± standard deviation.
KR cigarettes weighed 1.12 ± 0.04 grams and CB cigarettes weighed 1.12 + 0.10 grams.
Value in parentheses denotes number of samples.
                           Environmental Appraisal
5-21

-------
               Table 5.22. TRACE-METAL CONTENT OF CIGARETTE FRACTIONS
                                                                                      23
Fraction
KRC cigarettes
Smoked portion
(73% of total)
Smoked butt
TSCC (mainstream
particulate phase)
Ash
Sidestream
CBC cigarettes
Smoked portion
(73%)
Smoked butt
TSCC (mainstream
particulate phase)
Ash
Sidestream
Metal contenta'b
Cadmium
1.14
0.56 ± 0.03(6)
0.1210.03(5)
10.1%
0.45± 0.03 (4)
39.4%
0.43
38%
1.43
0.67± 0.02 (4)
0.10±0.01 (2)
7%
0.48± 0.02 (4)
33.5%
0.72
50%
Nickel
3.10
1.3310.07(2)
'0.08
2.6%
1.81±0.16(2)
58.4%
1.03
33%
5.51
2.6410.17 (4)
0.021 0.01 (2)
0.4%
4.271 0.20 (4)
77.5%
0.62
11%
Zinc
24.3
12.411.9(6)
0.36
1.5%
21.314.7(5)
87.6%
-0.66
3%
14.6
7.61 0.8 (4)
0.061 0.01 (2)
0.4%
11.910.5(4)
81.5%
0.40
3%
Concentrations  are in Mg per fraction listed. Values are means ± standard deviation  or calculated values. Parentheses
 indicate the number of samples.

 Percentages were calculated on basis of smoked portion.
CKR = Kentucky reference; TSC = tobacco smoke condensate; CB = commercial brand.
 Sidestream was calculated by subtracting the values of smoked butt, TSC, and ash from the total cigarette value given in
 Table 5.22. (Enrichment can be estimated by subtracting the calculated value for unsmoked butt from the experimental
 value given.)
 5-22
CADMIUM

-------
 5.3 REFERENCES FOR SECTION 5


 1.  Mineral Facts and Problems,  1970 Ed. U. S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Mines, Washington,
    D.C. Bulletin No. 650.  1970.

 2.  Cadmium: The  Dissipated  Element. Fulkerson, W., and H.  E. Goeller (Ed.). Oak Ridge National
    Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn. 1973.

 3.  Lange's Handbook of Chemistry. Lange, N. A. (Ed.). 8th Ed. New York, McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1952.

 4.  1971 Minerals Yearbook, Vol. HI. U. S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Mines, Washington, D. C.,
    1973.

 5.  Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 53rd Ed. Cleveland, Chemical Rubber Co., p. D-172.

 6.  National  Inventory  of  Sources and  Emissions: Cadmium, Nickel and Asbestos.  W. E. Davis  and
    Associates. Prepared for U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, National Air Pollution
    Control Administration, Washington, D. C., under Contract No. CPA-22-69-131. February 1970.

 7.  lungers, R. H., R. E. Lee, Jr., and D. J. von Lehmden. The EPA Fuel Surveillance Network.  1. Trace
    Constituents in Gasoline and Commercial Gasoline Fuel Additives. Environ. Sci. Technol. (in press)

 8.  Unpublished NASN cadmium data stored in the National  Aerometric Data Bank, U. S. Environmental
    Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, N. C.

 9.  Winchester, J. W., and P. R. Harrison. Area-wide Distribution of Lead, Copper, Cadmium and Bismuth
    in  Atmospheric Particles in Chicago and Northwest Indiana.  University of Michigan, Department of
    Meteorology and Oceanography, Ann Arbor, Mich. Report No.  01173-4-T. 1970.

10.  Kneip, T. J., M. Eisenbud,  C. D. Strehlow, and P. C. Freudenthal.  Airborne Particulates in New York
    City. J. Air Pollut. Contr. Assoc. 20:144-149, March 1970.

11.  Friberg, L., M. Piscatof, and G. Nordberg.  Cadmium in the Environment. Cleveland, Chemical Rubber
    Co. Press, 1971.

12.  Helena Valley, Montana, Area Environmental Pollution Study. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency,
    Office of Air Programs, Research Triangle Park, N. C. Publication No. AP-91. January  1972.

13.  Lee, R. E., R. K. Peterson, and J. Wagman. Particle Size Distribution of Metal Components in Urban
    Air. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2:288-290, 1968.

14.  Lee,  R.  E.,  S. S. Goranson,  R.  E. Enrione,  and  G.  B.  Morgan.  National Air Surveillance Cascade
    Impactor Network,  II.  Size Distribution Measurements of Trace Metal Components.  Environ.  Sci.
    Technol. 6:1025-1030, 1972.

15.  Creason,  J.  P., 0. McNulty, L.  T. Heiderscheit,  D.  H.  Swanson, and R. W. Buechley.  Roadside
    Gradients in Atmospheric  Concentrations of Cadmium,  Lead, and Zinc. In:  Trace  Substances in
    Environmental Health, V. Columbia, University of Missouri Press, 1972.

16.  Hunt, W. F., C. Pinkerton,  0. McNulty, and J. Creason. A Study of Trace Element Pollution of Air in
    77  Midwestern Cities. (Presented  at 4th Annual Conference on Trace Substances  in Environmental
    Health, University of Missouri. Columbia.1970.)
                                     Environmental Exposure                            5-23

-------
17. Lagerwerff, J. V. Trace Elements and the Quality of Our Environment. Prepared for presentation at the
    Symposium on Micronutrients in Agriculture. Muscle Shoals. Ala., April 20-22, 1971.

18. Schroeder, H. A., A. P. Nason, I. H. Tipton, and I. I. Balassa. Essential Trace Metals in Man: Zinc.'
    Relation to Environmental Cadmium. J.  Chron. Dis. 20:179-210,1967.

19. Community Water Supply Study. Environmental Health Service, Bureau of Water Hygiene, Cincinnati,
    Ohio.1970.

20. Bowen, H. J. M. Trace Elements in Biochemistry.  London, Academic Press,  1969.

21. Friberg, L.,  M.  Piscator,  G.  Nordberg, and  T. Kjellstrom. Cadmium in the Environment, II. The
    Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. Prepared for U. S. Environmental Protection  Agency,
    Research Triangle Park,  N. C., under  Contract  No. 68-02-0342.  Publication No.  EPA-R2-73-190.
    February 1973. 169 p.

22. Pringle, B. H., D. E. Hissong, E. L. Katz, and S. T. Mulawka. Trace Metal Accumulation by Estuarine
    Mollusks. J. Sanit. Eng. Div. 94:455-475, 1968.

23. Menden, E. E., F. J. Elia, L. W. Michael, and H. W. Petering. Distribution of Cadmium and Nickel of
    Tobacco During Cigarette Smoking. Environ. Sci. Technol. 6:830-832, 1972.
 5-24                                     CADMIUM

-------
                       6. ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE

6.1  HUMAN EXPOSURE AND INTAKE RATES
Cadmium enters  the body mainly through ingestion or inhalation. Skin penetration by soluble cadmium
compounds can take place, but this exposure route is of minor importance to the general population. The
estimated cadmium concentrations and the media through which human exposure may occur are listed in
Figure 6.1.

6.1.1  Food

Whereas the estimates of exposure via air or water are relatively accurate, reliable estimates of exposure via
food are difficult to obtain. There are several reasons for this lack of data. One is the difficulty of analyzing
cadmium in food; another, the fact that, whereas cadmium often is determined in the raw food material,
the actual exposure takes  place through mixed diets,  which have been processed in  different ways. This
processing may result either in the loss of cadmium during cooking or result in further contamination from
the utensils used.

Because of ambient cadmium concentrations, consumption of foods, even from uncontaminated areas, will
result in a daily intake of approximately 50 ,ug. Estimates of daily intakes in selected countries are given in
Table 6.1. These estimates are based on cadmium concentrations in raw agricultural products and available
data on consumption of different foodstuffs.
             Table 6.1. DAILY INTAKE OF CADMIUM VIA FOOD IN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES2
        Country
 Cadmium,
  jug/day
Measurement
  method
        United States

        West Germany


        Rumania

        Czechoslovakia
        Japan (nonpolluted
          area)
4 to 60

  48


38 to 64

  60


  59
 Dithizone

 Atomic absorption after
  extraction

 Dithizone

 Dithizone or isotope dilution
  or atomic absorption

 Dithizone or atomic absorption
  after extraction
                                              6-1

-------
                              CONCENTRATIONS
                                     ppm
                              mg/liter	y g/g
                                    1000
                                                           CHRONIC EFFECTS
                              500-
                                    100
              13-15-
                                          •50
                           -10
           9.0-
                U.S. SUPERPHOSPHATE
                              5.0 —
        SOILS <
              	2.45-
                 EXTRAPOLATED DAILY INTAKE IN
                  ppm FOR MAN THOUGHT TO
                  RESULT IN LISTED SYMPTOM
                (BASED ON TOTAL DAILY INTAKE OF
                  1600g OF FOOD CONTAINING THE
                  INDICATED CONCENTRATION OF
                      CADMIUM IN ppm)
                                               •3.0-
                                                   -3.4-
                                     1.0
                      0.26-
                        ,-0.13-
                                          •0.5
                                                   -0.35-
                                                                          -1.6-
            4% OF THE
          SURFACE WATER/
                                     0.1
                                                         I
                                                                   VALLEY
                                                             RICE AND SOYA
                                                                 CRUSTAL
                                                          •0.15-ABUNDANCE
                    	0.064-
                    0.05—
    USPHS
  MAXIMUM IN
POTABLE WATER
LES USGS

I OF THE
HCE WATER <
-ESUSGS
— 0.027-
{


.C


1

                                                         >EXTREME RANGE
                                                           OF U.S. FOODS
 :ANGE FOR
U. S. INSTITU-
TIONAL DIETS
                                                                                 ITAI ITAI
                                  -0.08—^r-
                                                                  50 YEAR INTAKE
                                                                  TO CAUSE KIDNEY
                                                                  DAMAGE
                                    0.001
  54%OF THE
SURFACE WATER
SAMPLES USGS   ]
                                           0.0003 CARIBBEAN SEA WATER
 Figure 6.1.  Cadmium concentrations of surface waters,  soils, and foods and estimated
 dose levels resulting in various symptoms and effects in humans.1
6-2
                                       CADMIUM

-------
As can be seen, there if fairly good agreement between estimates obtained in different countries. It should
be pointed out, however, mat because of the method used, U.S. values are higher. The method using
extraction of the element is more accurate.

Generally, there is agreement that fruit has the lowest cadmium levels and that shellfish and the kidney and
liver of animals have the highest concentrations.

Polluted areas present a different picture. Rice in the Jintsu Valley of Japan was found to have a cadmium
content 30 times greater than in nonpolluted areas.3  The rice fields were polluted by industrial activities.

A study by EPA in East Helena, Mont, indicates that up to 83 /ag/day  of cadmium could be added to an
ordinary diet by the consumption of fruits and vegetables grown in soil contaminated by cadmium.

Eating shellfish can also add to the amount of cadmium ingested. The Eastern oyster was found to contain
an average of 3.1  ppm; the  soft shell clam and Northern Quahaug clam contained  0.27 and 0.19 ppm,
respectively.5  Seawater has an average cadmium  concentration  of  0.0001 ppm, and the  biological
accumulation of cadmium by shellfish ranges from 100 to more than 3,000 ppm.

6.1.2 Air

In ambient air, mean yearly cadmium concentrations may range from less than 0.001 to 0.05 ,ug/m3. Higher
values have  been reported in areas near cadmium-emitting industries,  such as in Sweden where monthly
means of up to 0.3 Mg/m3 have been measured.2

Few  data  dealing  with the deposition,  retention,  and  elimination of cadmium  aerosol exist.2  If the
assumption is made, however, that the deposition of inhaled cadmium aerosols in the  respiratory system is
similar to the behavior of  other particulate matter,  then the  deposition depends  not  only on  the  air
concentration but also  on particle size. It can be said,  then, that the amount of cadmium inhaled depends
on  the volume  of air (average inhalation is 20 m3/day) and the ambient concentration of cadmium. The
fraction of the inhaled portion  that is deposited in the lung depends on the particle  size—the smaller the
particle, the greater the rate of deposition.

6.1.3 Smoking

Cadmium  has been found in cigarettes in amounts  of about 1 to  2 jug  per cigarette.6"8 Using smoking
machines and standardized methods, it has been shown that 0.1 to 0.2 /ug of cadmium per cigarette will be
found in the mainstream.

The smoking of 20 cigarettes per day, then, could cause the inhalation of 2 to 4 /ug of cadmium depending
on the amount of smoke inhaled. Autopsies made of smokers and nonsmokers substantiate this statement.9
It was found that there was  a significant correlation between the number of years of cigarette  smoking and
the amount of cadmium in kidney, liver, and lungs.

The smoker is not the only person exposed to cadmium, however. Studies indicate that  more cadmium is
emitted from cigarettes in the sidestream than from the mainstream. Sidestream smoke has been shown to
contain from 0.43 to 0.72 ug of cadmium per cigarette.8

6.1.4 Water

The cadmium  concentration of  waters,  in areas unpolluted by  cadmium, has been  reported as being 1
/ug/liter (1 ppb) or less.2 The proposed EPA drinking water standard is  10 /ug/liter (0.01 ppm). Although
higher concentrations for drinking water have been  reported in certain areas of the United States, drinking
water  generally contains less  than 1 /ug/liter. At this level, consumption of up to 4 liters of water per day

                                   Environmental Exposure                                6-3

-------
would result in the ingestion of only a few micrograms. At a concentration of 10 ;ug, a daily intake of 20 to
40 pig of cadmium would result if 2 to 4 liters of water were consumed.

6.1.5  Soil

Comprehensive studies of cadmium exposure from soils have not been made. Cadmium in the soil may be
taken up by plants and thus become available to man through food.


6.2  REFERENCES FOR SECTION 6


1. Cadmium: The  Dissipated Element.  Fulkerson,  W.,  and H.  E.  Goeller  (Ed). Oak Ridge National
   Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn. 1973.

2. Friberg, L., M. Piscator, and G. Nordberg.  Cadmium in the Environment. Cleveland, Chemical Rubber
   Co. Press, 1971.

3. Yamagata, N. and I. Shigematsu. Cadmium Pollution in Perspective. Bull. Inst. Public Health. 79:1-27,
   1970.

4. Helena Valley, Montana, Area Environmental Pollution Study. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency,
   Office of Air Programs, Research Triangle Park, N.C. Publication No. AP-91. January 1972.

 5. Pringle, B. H., D. E. Hissong,  E. L. Katz, and S. T. Mulawka. Trace Metal Accumulation by Estuarine
   Mollusks. J. Sanit. Eng. Div. 94:455-475,  1968.

 6. Szadkowski,  D.,  H. Schultze, K. H. Schaller, and  G. Lehnert. Zur Okologischen Bedeutung des
   Schwermetallgehalts von Zigarettes. (Consideration of the Oncologies  Significance of the Heavy Metals
   in Cigarettes.) Arch. Hyg. Bakteriol. 153:\, 1969.

 7. Nandi, M., H. Jick, D. Slone, S. Shapiro, and G. P.  Lewis. Cadmium Content of Cigarettes. Lancet.
   11:1329, 1969.

 8. Menden, E. E., F. J. Elia, L. W. Michael, and H. G. Petering. Distribution of Cadmium and Nickel of
   Tobacco During Cigarette Smoking. Environ. Sci. Technol. (5:830-832,  1972.

 9. Lewis, G. P., L.  Coughlin, W. J. Jusko,  and S. Hartz. Contribution of Cigarette Smoking to Cadmium
   Accumulation in Man.  Lancet. 7:291-293, 1972.
6-4                                      CADMIUM

-------
           7. MECHANISMS  OF EXPOSURE AND RESPONSE

7.1  RESPIRATORY ABSORPTION

Respiratory absorption is one of the chief avenues of entrance of pollutants into the human body. There
are, however, very  few data dealing with the deposition, retention, and elimination of cadmium aerosols
entering the lungs.1 The rate of deposition of particles in the lungs is dependent on particle size as well as
the concentration in the air.1

Cadmium is absorbed to a large extent after inhalation. Absorption occurs primarily in the lungs, but occurs
also  in the gastrointestinal tract after mucociliary clearance. Data dealing  with human absorption are not
available, but animal experiments  suggest an absorption of between 10 to 40 percent of the cadmium
inhaled.2 For instance, calculations based on experiments  by Friberg3 in which rabbits were exposed  to
cadmium iron oxide dust for  several months showed that about 30 percent of the inhaled cadmium was
absorbed into the body.

7.2  GASTROINTESTINAL ABSORPTION

The  absorption and excretion of radioactive cadmium in five  human volunteers was studied by  Rahola et
al.4 They found that during the 3  to 5 days following the administration  of labeled cadmium (' : s Cd) in
calf-kidney suspension, about  70 percent of the activity was eliminated. The total ingestion of cadmium
was about 100 /ug.  Most of the excreted activity was in the feces. Rapid elimination of the tracer  continued
until about 6 percent  of  the dose remained in  the  body,  indicating an average absorption of at least 6
percent.

Experiments in adult animals  have shown that  between 1  and 3 percent  of the oral dose of cadmium is
retained in the body  several  days after exposure. These results suggest  that a considerable amount  of
unabsorbed cadmium will be excreted in feces as late as between the  5th  and 10th day.2 The decrease in
whole-body retention of radioactive cadmium was very slow  from 20 days to 2 months after exposure.2

The  influence  of calcium deficiency  on absorption and retention of cadmium  after oral intake has been
studied. The studies indicated that rats on low-calcium diets accumulate more cadmium in their livers and
kidneys than rats on high-calcium  diets.1'2 Vitamin  D and the protein level of the diet appear to affect
cadmium retention in  animals  since (1) rachitic chickens  absorb more cadmium  when vitamin D is
administered along with cadmium1  and (2) mice on a low-protein diet for 24 hours preceding and following
an oral dose of cadmium chloride absorbed about twice as much cadmium as mice on a high-protein diet for
the same period.1

The available data,  therefore, indicate that the absorption rate of cadmium  is about 6 percent in male adult
human beings. Absorption may be higher for individuals with a calcium  deficiency  or a greater calcium
demand.2

7.3  TRANSPORT AND DISTRIBUTION

Most of the work  on  the transport and distribution aspects of  cadmium metabolism has been  done  in
animals. Because such  a small proportion of orally  administered cadmium is absorbed, it has not been

                                              7-1

-------
possible to study the distribution of radioactive cadmium in the blood after ingestion of the materials.
After interperitoneal administration, most of the cadmium initially found in the blood is associated with
the plasma. It is then rapidly cleared from the plasma and, after about 12 to 24 hours, the concentrations in
the whole blood begins to rise again. This is caused by an increase in the cadmium content of the red blood
cells, which, at mat time, also contain metallothionein.1  When animals are given repeated injections of
cadmium, the concentrations of the metal in the  erythrocytes becomes many times greater than  the
concentration in the plasma. Further distribution of cadmium throughout the body is dependent on  the
elapsed time since the absorption of the material. The largest concentrations of the metal are found in the
liver  and the kidneys. The concentrations  of the metal in these organs are roughly proportional to  the
intake of cadmium; but as the dose of cadmium is increased, the proportion in the liver becomes greater.1

In individuals without known "over" exposure to cadmium, the mean level in whole blood is less than 1
jug/100 ml. In workers exposed to cadmium, concentrations of up to 30 jug/100 ml of whole  blood have
been  found.  In workers  exposed to cadmium, the blood cadmium  concentration will decrease when
exposure stops.1

Cadmium concentrations have been determined in the organs of various populations. In the United States,
the average concentration of cadmium in  the liver of "normal" individuals varies with age.  The values
usually do not exceed 2 jug/g  of tissue (wet weight). "Normal" values from two Japanese  studies  are
higher.1

The placenta is an effective barrier for cadmium, and the  concentration in the liver of the newborn is  less
than 0.002 jug/g.

Data on the concentration of cadmium in the livers  of workers who have been exposed to cadmium oxide
dust  in the past have shown that there is no tendency for the concentration to decrease substantially with
time following the cessation of exposure to cadmium.1 Data from the United States, Japan, Sweden,  and
East  Germany show that there is a progressive increase in the concentration of cadmium in the renal cortex
with increasing age. The average concentration of cadmium in the renal cortex by age groups in the United
States is shown in Table 7.1
                  Table 7.1.  AVERAGE CADMIUM CONCENTRATION IN RENAL
                       CORTEX BY AGE GROUPS IN THE UNITED STATES
Age group
1 to 9
" 10 to 19
20 to 29
30 to 39
40 to 49
Cadmium content,
jug/g wet weight
7
25
30
46
53
 After age 50 to 60, there is a decline in the concentration of cadmium in the renal cortex. Why this occurs
 is not known. Recent investigations by  Hammer et al.s have shown that in North Carolina the average
 cadmium concentration at age 50 is about 25 /ug/g of tissue (wet weight). This result is similar to values
 reported from Sweden and East Germany, but lower than in areas in Japan regarded as not being polluted
 by cadmium (Table 7.2).

 7-2                                       CADMIUM

-------
        Table 7.2. MEAN CADMIUM CONCENTRATIONS IN RENAL CORTEX AT AGE 501'2
Country
East Germany
East Germany
Sweden
(Stockholm)
United States
(large cities)
United States
(North Carolina)
Japan
(Kobe)
Japan
(Kanazawa)
Japan
(Tokyo)
Sex
M
F
M and F

Mand F

M and F

M and F

Mand F

Mand F

Cadmium content,
M9/g wet weight
30
15
30

50

25

60

85

125

7.4    EXCRETION

7.4.1  Urine

The  average normal excretion of cadmium in urine is less than 5 Mg/day. Most of the studies done in the
past  years have found the excretion to be 1 to 2 Mg/day in adults. Recent investigations in Japan have
shown that  the urinary excretion will increase with age, being about 0.5 /ug/liter in children and about 2
Mg/liter at age 40.6' 7

Various studies have found cadmium excretion varying from less than 1  Mg/day  to 100 Mg/day. It has
recently been shown that in workers with long-term exposure to relatively low concentrations of cadmium
oxide dust,  urinary excretion of cadmium  generally did not exceed 10 Mg/g creatinine in workers with
normal  urine  protein  electrophoretic  patterns,  whereas workers  with  tubular  proteinuria excreted
considerably larger amounts. Renal tubular dysfunction may thus cause increased excretion of cadmium. In
workers with short-term, high-level exposure  to cadmium oxide dust or fumes, the urinary excretion of
cadmium may sometimes be  high  without any changes in renal function. In  these cases the increased
urinary excretion probably reflects the more recent exposure than the body burden.1

The increased urinary excretion when there is renal damage explains why renal concentrations of cadmium
often have been quite low in autopsied workers with severe morphological kidney changes.1

7.4.2  Feces

Animal  experiments have shown  that  a small percent of injected cadmium  will  be excreted  via the
alimentary tract. This excretion is mainly dependent on recent exposure.1 The data do not indicate  the role
this excretion route plays in human beings.1
                           Mechanisms of Exposure and Response
7-3

-------
7.4.3'Hair t

A small amount of cadmium is excreted in the hair. Although this excretion is not important as a means of
ridding the body of cadmium, it has been explored as a possible indicator of cadmium exposure. The
method is complicated by the fact that hair can be contaminated by metals in the atmosphere as well as
metals in hair lotions and hair spray.

7.5  BODY BURDEN

Schroeder and  Balassa8 estimated the total body burden of cadmium to be about 30 mg in the "standard
American man."  In a study in North Carolina, Hammer et al.5  found the corresponding figure to be about
15 mg, which is similar to what has been found in some European countries.

According to Friberg et al.1  the total body burden at age  50 in noncontaminated areas in Europe is 15 to
20 mg and in Japan 40 to 80 mg. Recent studies of Tsuchiya et al.7  support the conclusions that even in
so-called nonpolluted  areas  of Japan, body burdens  of cadmium  are much  higher  than  in  other
industrialized areas of the world.

Earlier assumptions that  smokers will have higher body burdens than nonsmokers have been verified by the
results of Lewis et al.9 They determined the cadmium content in the kidney, liver, and lungs of 45 male
smokers (mean age 60 years) and in 22 male nonsmokers (mean  age 60 years). It was possible to calculate
the number of "cigarette pack years" for each smoker. Cadmium in kidney, liver, and lungs of nonsmokers
averaged 6.6 mg; in smokers,  the corresponding figure was 15.8 mg. There  was a significant association
between the number of pack years and cadmium accumulation.

About half of the total cadmium will be found in liver and kidneys together—about a third in the kidneys
alone. In exposed workers, the percentage in the liver increases in relation to the kidney.

7.6  BIOLOGICAL HALF-TIME

The biological half-time of cadmium in humans is extremely long. This conclusion is based on a model for
cadmium accumulation  in the body based  on the concept that one-third of the body  burden was in the
kidneys.1  Kjellstrom10   and Tsuchiya et  al.11   used autopsy  data and calorie  consumption in these
calculations. Biological half-times of from 18 to 33 years were thus obtained. Tsuchiya et al.12  calculated
the biological half-time to be about 17 years in the kidney and 6 years in the liver, based on renal and liver
burdens of cadmium obtained by autopsies on inhabitants of Tokyo.

In these reports,  it was noted that many parameters must be taken into account when calculating biological
half-time, such as changes in food intake and changes in kidney weight with age. Changes in exposure over
the years must also be taken into account.13  All data continue  to favor a very long biological half-time,
although the question of the exact biological  half-time  of cadmium  in the human body is still under
discussion.2
7.7  CONCLUSIONS

Current knowledge of the mechanisms of exposure and response lead to the following conclusions:

   • Uncertainties with  regard to absorption rates after inhalation in humans and other animals still exist
     and demand extensive investigation.

   • Calcium deficiency will cause a considerable increase in cadmium absorption whether exposure occurs
     through food or drinking water.

 7-4                                      CADMIUM

-------
   • The initial accumulation of cadmium in red blood cells is followed by a decrease and later by a new
     accumulation. This distribution  is associated with a buildup of metallothionein in the cells. After
     exposure to cadmium ceases, blood levels gradually drop.

   • Repeated exposure to small amounts of cadmium results in its continuous buildup in liver, kidneys,
     and other organs.

   • In human beings, an absorption of ingested cadmium of up to 10 percent must be considered possible
     when conditions such as a calcium or protein deficiency exist.

   • Total body burden of cadmium at age 50 is approximately 15 to 20 mg in Europe; 15 to 30 mg in the
     U.S.; and 40 to 80 mg in Japan.

   • In normal human beings, daily excretion of cadmium via urine is very low, 2 /ag/liter or less.

   • Estimates based on mathematical models show that the half-time for cadmium in the total body may
     be between 10 and 30 years. Many uncertainties still exist with regard to biological half-time in total
     body and in  different organs. It is obvious, however, that the biological  half-time of cadmium is
     extremely long.
7.8 REFERENCES FOR SECTION 7.

 1.  Friberg, L., M. Piscator, and G. Nordberg. Cadmium in the Environment. Cleveland, Chemical Rubber
    Co. Press, 1971.

 2.  Friberg, L., M. Piscator, G. Nordberg, and  T.  Kjellstrom.  Cadmium in  the  Environment, II.  The
    Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. Prepared for the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency,
    Research  Triangle Park, N.C., under Contract No.  65-02-0342. Publication No.  EPA-R2-73-190.
    February  1973. 169 p.

 3.  Friberg, L.  Health Hazards in  the Manufacture of Akaline Accumulators  with Special Reference to
    Chronic Cadmium Poisoning. Acta. Med. Scand. Suppl.  138:240, 1950.

 4.  Rahola, T. R., R. R. Aaren, and J. K. Miettinen. Half-time Studies of Mercury and Cadmium by Whole
    Body Counting. (Presented  at IAEA/WHO. Symposium on the Assessment of Radioactive Organ and
    Body Burdens, Stockholm. Nov. 22-26, 1971.)

 5.  Hammer,  D. I., A. V. Colucci,  V. Hasselblad, M. E. Williams, and C. Pinkerton. Cadmium and Lead in
    Autopsy Tissues. J. Occup. Med. 75:956-963,  1973.

 6.  Katagiri, Y., M. Tati, H. Iwata, and M. Kawai. Concentration of Cadmium in Urine by Age. Med. Biol.
    52:239, 1971 (in Japanese).

 7.  Tsuchiya, K.,  Y.  Seki,  and M. Sugita. Organ and Tissue Cadmium Concentrations of Cadavers from
    Accidental Deaths. (Presented at  17th International Congress  on Occupational Health, Buenos Aires.
    1972.)

 8.  Schroeder, H.  A., and J. J.  Balassa. Abnormal Trace Metals in Man: Cadmium. J. Chron. Dis. 14:236,
    1961.

 9.  Lewis, G. P., W. J. Jusko, L. Coughlin, and S. Hartz. Contribution of Cigarette Smoking to Cadmium
    Accumulation  in Man. Lancet. 7:291-293, 1972.

                           Mechanisms of Exposure and Response                        7-5

-------
 10.  Kjellstrom, T. A Mathematical Model for the Accumulation of Cadmium in Human Kidney Cortex.
     Nord.Hyg. J. 55:111, 1971.

 11.  Tsuchiya, R., M. Sugita, and Y. Seki. A Mathematical Model for Deriving the Biological Half-life of a
     Chemical. Nord. Hyg. J. 5J:105, 1971.

 12.  Tsuchiya, K., M. Sugita,  and Y.  Seki. A Mathematical Approach to Deriving Biological Half-time of
     Cadmium in  Some  Organs,  Calculation from Observed Accumulation in Organs. (Presented at 17th
     International Congress on Occupational Health, Buenos Aires. 1972.)

 13.  Kjellstrom, T., and  L. Friberg. Interpretation of Empirically Documented  Body  Burdens by Age of
     Metals with Long  Biological Half-Times with Special  Reference to Past Changes in the Exposure.
     (Presented at 17th International Congress on Occupational Health, Buenos Aires. 1972.)
7-6                                      CADMIUM

-------
                                       8.  EFFECTS

8.1   HUMAN IMPACT

8.1.1  Respiratory Effects of Cadmium Exposure

8.1.1.1 Acute Effects~Anima[ studies indicate  that effects from the  inhalation  of cadmium oxide  or
cadmium chloride aerosols occur in three clearly demarcated stages:

       •  Acute pulmonary edema, developing within 24 hours of exposure.

       •  Proliferative  interstitial pneumonitis, observed from the third to the tenth day after exposure.

       •  Permanent lung damage in the form of perivascular and peribronchial fibrosis.1

The first two stages have been confirmed clinically or through autopsy for humans.1

The  cadmium dose that  resulted  in  two  human  deaths  was  calculated  to  be  approximately 2,500
mg/m3-min. This represents an exposure to 100 mg/m3  for 25 minutes or 50 mg/m3 for 50 minutes.1

8.1.1.2 Chronic Effects—Friberg2 found emphysema of the lung among male workers chronically exposed
to cadmium oxide dust in an alkaline battery factory in Sweden. Quantitative  data concerning the exposure
levels were incomplete; however, a range of 3 to 15 mg/m3  was reported. Several other instances of lung
damage, including pulmonary sclerosis, bronchitis, and emphysema have been  reported.1 Little information
is  available, however,  concerning  the  possible association  between respiratory  disease  and  exposure  to
cadmium via ambient  air. The establishment of dose-response relationships is hindered at present because
time-weighted average exposures are available only for short time spans.1

8.1.2  Systemic Effects  of Cadmium Exposure

8.1.2.1 Kidney Effects—In fatal cases of acute cadmium poisoning via inhalation, pathological changes have
been found in the kidneys.1 Transient proteinuria has been detected in individuals with nonlethal cadmium
exposure.1

Prolonged exposure  to cadmium oxide dust has given rise to renal damage in factory workers. Proteinuria is
the most common clinical manifestation of this type of renal damage.1  Piscator and Lind3 have shown that
the magnitude of proteinuria is related to the length of exposure. Glycosuria, amino-aciduria, diminished
concentrating capacity, and renal stones have also been reported in cadmium-exposed workers.  Although
proteinuria occurs frequently in cadmium workers, its magnitude tends not to progress once the exposure
to the metal ceases.

The relationship between the dose of cadmium and the degree of kidney damage is poorly defined. Present
data  are inadequate  to accurately quantitate the magnitude of the cadmium exposure of industrial workers.
Furthermore,  because there is no constant relationship between the concentration of cadmium in the blood
and the cadmium content of the kidney, the former cannot be used to estimate the dose of cadmium in the
kidneys.

                                             8-1

-------
On the basis of data from workers exposed to cadmium and from animals manifesting functional and
morphological changes in the renal cortex following exposure to cadmium, the authors of Cadmium in the
Environment1 have concluded that a cadmium concentration of about 200 ppm (wet weight) in the renal
cortex is  a "critical  concentration."  When a level of 200 ppm  is reached, the first sign  of  tubular
dysfunction (tubular proteinuria) may appear in sensitive persons.  Estimates of the  long-term exposure
necessary to achieve a concentration of 200 ppm of cadmium in the renal cortex have been made (Table
8.1).
             Table 8.1. ESTIMATED MINIMUM CADMIUM LEVELS VIA INHALATION
            OR INGESTION NECESSARY FOR REACHING 200 ppm (WET WEIGHT) OF
           CADMIUM IN RENAL CORTEX (TOTAL BODY BURDEN: 120 mg CADMIUM)
                                           (jugCd/m3)
Exposure,
years
10
25
50
Total daily
ingestion
Retention rate, %
2.5
1324
530
265
5
662
265
132
10
331
132
66
Ambient aira
Retention rate, %
10
16.2
6.5
3.2
25
6.5
2.6
1.3
40
4.1
1.6
0.8
Industrial aira
Retention rate, %
10
52.5
21.0
10.5
25
21.0
8.4
4.2
40
13.1
5.2
2.6
 A lung ventilation of 20 m3 per day has been used for evaluation of ambient air exposure. A lung ventilation of 10 m3 per
8 hours for 225 days per year has been used for evaluation of industrial air exposure. No corrections have been made for
cumulative effects of different types of exposure, including tobacco smoking. A linear approximation of the accumulation
of cadmium has been used.
Using Table 8.1, it can be noted that a daily oral intake over 50 years of 100 to 150 Mg cadmium with a 5
percent retention may give rise to renal dysfunction. Long-term exposure to low levels of cadmium usually
result in about one-third of the cadmium remaining in the kidneys.1

Calcium deficiency has been shown to  increase the  absorption of cadmium.1  Exposure via water and
smoking should also be taken into account.

8.1.2.2  Liver Effects—In workers suffering from acute cadmium poisoning as a result of a toxic exposure to
cadmium oxide fumes, microscopic  changes were evident in the liver. Increases in serum gamma globulin
have also been reported in several victims. Whether these changes represent a direct toxic effect of cadmium
on the  liver or whether they are merely  secondary to  cadmium-induced pulmonary  edema is not known.
Changes in liver function in humans after long-term exposures have not been extensively examined.1

Changes in the activity of certain hepatic enzymes were noted in rats receiving 1 ppm cadmium in drinking
water for 335 days; however, cadmium  concentrations were not determined  in the organs. In a  similar
experiment  where rats received 0.5  ppm  cadmium in  drinking water for 1  year, the  mean  cadmium
concentration in  the liver was found to be 1.1 ppm, which is  of  the same magnitude as the  cadmium
concentration found in the liver of normal human adults.1

8.1.2.3  Bone Effects—Cadmium is not known  to be concentrated in bone tissue; thus, any direct action
upon bone is unlikely.1 Some instances of pseudo-fractures have been reported among cadmium workers;
however, the effects on bone are probably secondary to the effects on calcium-phosphorous metabolism. It
 8-2
CADMIUM

-------
is thought that chronic cadmium poisoning in conjunction with a calcium and vitamin D deficiency causes
the Itai-itai disease, a bone malady occurring in Japan.1 This disease is a form of osteomalacia afflicting
mainly  post-menopausal  Japanese women  living in Toyama  Prefecture.  The  disease is characterized
symptomatically by lower back and  leg pains. Chronic cadmium poisoning is thought  to be one of the
causative agents because a cadmium mine is located  upriver  from the endemic area. Analysis of food and
water in the  area, in combination with data on the average daily  intake  of different  foods, led to  an
estimated daily ingested dose in recent years of 600 ,ug. Estimates for earlier years are not available.1

Animal  studies have  shown  that exposure to  cadmium in calcium-deficient  rats will  cause a rapid
demineralization.4  Further studies5 revealed that rats exposed to 10 ppm of cadmium in  drinking water
and a low-calcium diet showed renal tubular damage as well as a significant reduction in the mineral content
of bone. It is not known whether the bone changes were caused by changes in renal function  or by an effect
of cadmium on the intestinal absorption of calcium.

8.1.2.4  Anemia— Anemia  has been observed in cadmium workers exposed to cadmium oxide dust or fumes.
A  significant  correlation  was  found between high cadmium levels in blood and low hemoglobin levels.1
Although the number of eosinophile  cells increases, white cells are generally normal in exposed workers.1

Anemia has been  frequently evident in experimental animals that  were either orally or  systematically
exposed to cadmium.1

8.1.2.5  Cardiovascular Disease and Hypertension-Cadmium has been  shown to  cause hypertension  in
animals; furthermore,  human beings with hypertension excreted more cadmium via urine and had a higher
cadmium-to-zinc ratio in  their kidneys than normotensive subjects. Carroll6  found a correlation between
the concentration of cadmium in the air of 28  American cities and death rates from hypertension and
arteriosclerotic heart disease. Rickey  et al.7 made a  similar study and found that cadmium together with
vanadium was correlated with mortality from heart disease.

Hunt et al.8 reanalyzed Carroll's  data and found that there was a higher correlation between population
density and death rates than between cadmium concentrations in air and death rates.

In Cadmium in the Environment1  this question was discussed in detail and it was stated:  "The results from
epidemiological studies are hitherto  ambiguous. They have been obtained by associating  cardiovascular
disease with dustfall  data or cadmium concentrations in  air. Other  more important sources of cadmium
exposure have not been considered."  In  addition to the earlier mentioned effect  of population density, it
was pointed out that smoking had not been considered as a variable  in Carroll's  analysis. Furthermore, a
higher  prevalence  of hypertension has not  been found  among workers exposed to cadmium or  in
populations in Japan exposed to cadmium via food.

Hammer et al.9 studied groups of workers with low, intermediate, and high exposure to cadmium. They
could not find a consistent relationship between cadmium and blood pressure. Evidence is still lacking for
associating hypertension with cadmium exposure.

8.1.2.6  Gonadal Effects—Systemic administration of cadmium has  caused acute testicular necrosis in a
number of animal species. Although  high concentrations of cadmium have been  found in testicular tissue
from occupationally  exposed  men,  acute testicular necrosis  from  exposure  to cadmium has  not  been
reported in  humans.  The effects  of cadmium  on testes and ovaries of humans have not been  studied
extensively.  The repeated, demonstrated effects of  cadmium on animal gonads emphasize the need for
further study.1

8.1.2.7  Carcinogenesis—Studies in rats have shown that cadmium injected subcutaneously  or intramuscu-
larly has resulted in sarcomas (solid tumors) at the injection site.1

The  evidence  that cadmium  may act as a carcinogen in man is not  conclusive.1  One  report  on the
prevalence of cancer  among workers exposed to cadmium oxide dust in the production of alkaline batteries

                                             Effects                                          8-3

-------
showed that 8 of 74 men with at least 10 years exposure had died. Of the eight, three had died of cancer of
the prostate.1  Another report on 248 workers exposed for a minimum of 1 year to cadmium oxide showed
that four had developed cancer of the prostate.1 According to annual  incidence  rates supplied by the
regional cancer registry, the expected number of cases of prostatic cancer was 0.58.' Further studies are
needed to obtain conclusive evidence of carcinogenesis associated with cadmium in humans.

The possible association between  cadmium and cancer of the gastrointestinal tract has not been studied
extensively.

8.1.2.8 Teratology—Data dealing with the teratogenic effects of cadmium in humans  are lacking. One study
indicates a significant decrease in weight in newborn children of cadmium-exposed women.1

8.1.2.9 Mutagenesis-Very little information is available concerning possible  genetic effects of cadmium
and cadmium compounds.

8.1.2.10  Summary-

   • Based on animal experiments, three clearly  demarcated  stages result from the inhalation of cadmium
     oxide or cadmium chloride aerosols. Only the first two of these have been found in man.

   • Emphysema of the lung was found among male workers chronically exposed to cadmium oxide dust.
     Exposure levels were  in the 3- to 15-mg/m3 range.

   • Determination of dose-response relationship is not possible at the present time because of the absence
     of data.

   • In fatal cases of acute cadmium poisoning by inhalation, pathological changes have been found in the
     kidneys.

   • Proteinuria is the most common clinical manifestation of renal damage.

   • A concentration of  approximately  200 ppm  (wet weight)  in the renal cortex  may cause the
     appearance of tubular dysfunction in sensitive individuals.

   • Microscopic changes may appear in the liver  as a result of acute  exposure to cadmium oxide fumes.

   • Cadmium effects on  bone do not appear to be direct but are probably secondary, reflecting defects
     upon calcium metabolism.

   • A significant correlation seems to exist between high cadmium levels in the blood and low levels of
     hemoglobin.

   • Further  evidence is necessary before hypertension in humans can  be linked with cadmium in the
     body.

   • To definitively associate cadmium with carcinogenesis, further studies are necessary.

   • Data dealing with teratogenic and mutagenic effects of cadmium are lacking.


 8.1.3 Clinical Studies

 8.1.3.4 Itai-itai Disease, Proteinuria, and Cadmium  Exposure - The Japanese Experience -The so-called
 Itai-itai disease was first seen in villages along the Jintsu River in Toyama Prefecture, Japan. This is a bone
 disease, osteomalacia, that mainly affects women above 40 years of age who have had multiple pregnancies.

 8-4                                      CADMIUM

-------
The cause of this disease is thought to be long-term ingestion of rice contaminated by cadmium from river
water used in irrigating rice fields.

In Cadmium in  the Environment?  this disease is  discussed in  detail. The authors  concluded that "The
Itai-itai disease is a manifestation of chronic cadmium poisoning. It might well be, however, that cadmium
has acted upon  a  population particularly sensitive because of deficient  consumption of certain essential
food  ingredients and vitamins.  A low  intake of  calcium  and vitamin  D may have been of particular
importance."

Epidemiological  studies in the Toyama area showed that in the  endemic district about 50 percent or more
of the inhabitants  older than 60 had proteinuria. A high prevalence of proteinuria also occurred in males;
however, males generally did not show signs of Itai-itai disease. The proteinuria was of the tubular type seen
in chronic cadmium poisoning. A higher prevalence of glycosuria was also found in the endemic area.1

The findings in Toyama initiated studies in other areas of Japan where high concentrations  of cadmium had
been  found  in rice—such as  in a polluted area on Tsushima Island.1 Itai-itai disease  was not found, but a
higher prevalence of proteinuria was discovered among  both males and females living in the most polluted
area compared with a control area. It was concluded that the data from Tsushima Island strongly supported
the hypothesis that cadmium intoxication might have occurred in parts of Japan other than Toyama.

During the past  few years several areas have been under study for the effects of cadmium pollution. The
main aim has been to find  cases of Itai-itai  disease, but as the screening  methods for detection of this
disease  include  tests for  proteinuria,  some data  can  be used for  epidemiological  evaluations. A
comprehensive review of the recent experience includes descriptions of the  methods used, the areas under
study, the exposure conditions, etc.10

At  present,  data are available from Fuchu (Toyama Prefecture),  Tsushima (Nagasaki Prefecture), Bandai
(Fukushima Prefecture),  Annaka (Gumma Prefecture), Ikuno (Hyogo Prefecture), Kakehashi (Ishikawa
Prefecture),  and  Omuta (Fukuoka Prefecture) and from areas in Akita, Miyagi, and Oita Prefectures.10

In most areas, several thousands of women above 30 or 40 years of age living in both polluted and control
areas have  been examined  for proteinuria.  Testing has usually been  by  using  trichJorouric acid or
sulfosalicylic acid.  Although the standard screening method set criteria for evaluating proteinuria, very few
of the published studies give detailed  ratings. A careful examination of the procedures has shown that in
many instances  only  ± has been used and that in some areas a ±  outfall  of the  test has been recorded as
positive,  whereas in other investigations a ±  result has been recorded as negative.10  This inconsistency
makes it difficult  to compare different areas. Moreover, the investigations have  not  been  performed on a
blind basis. It has not always been possible to obtain age-related prevalences  of proteinuria  in both exposed
and control  areas.  Furthermore, at least one control area (in Annaka) is not  a true control area because the
concentrations of cadmium in rice were about the same as in the polluted area. In other control areas, it has
not always been  possible  to  estimate the exposure  because cadmium has not been estimated in the rice.10

Despite many difficulties in  interpreting the results from the recent investigations in Japan, the following
findings are  worth mentioning.  In Ikuno, 1700 women  over 30 years of age were examined in 1971 in the
polluted area where average cadmium concentrations in  rice were 0.56 ppm in 1970 and 0.39 ppm in 1971.
The prevalence of proteinuria was 58 percent, compared with 33 percent in a control area. In two other
control areas investigated in  1972, the  prevalence  of proteinuria was  4  and 9 percent. In Kanahira,
Kakehashi, where  the average cadmium concentration in rice was 0.8 ppm, the prevalence of proteinuria
was 39 percent, as compared with 22 to 30 percent in  three villages with average rice concentration? of 0.23
to 0.34 ppm.10

In Gumma,  age-related prevalences could be calculated, but since the exposure in the  "control area" was
probably about the same as  in the polluted area, the results from this study can thus not  be used. In both
areas there was a sharp increase in proteinuria with age.

                                             Effects                                           8-5

-------
Earlier findings in  Fuchu (Itai-itai area) have been confirmed, whereas recent investigations on Tsushima
Island in 1971 and 1972 have not confirmed the earlier mentioned findings in the polluted area. In these
later studies, however,  one  control area was omitted in 1971, and in 1972 no control area was included,
which makes it difficult to compare the studies.10

There are many inconsistencies and errors in the epidemiological methods. A great need exists for more
carefully designed epidemiological studies in Japan. The present data, however, indicate that in areas with
excessive exposure to cadmium,  the prevalence of proteinuria seems to be higher than in the areas with
lower exposures. Although  the evidence is not conclusive, it points to cadmium toxicity as the cause of
Itai-itai disease.

8.2  ECOLOGICAL IMPACT

Studies that deal with the concentrations of cadmium in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems and the effects
of the concentrations upon these ecosystems are limited in number.

The chief concerns regarding cadmium in these ecosystems are the possibility of its movement through food
chains to humans and its possible detrimental effects upon plants and animals within the ecosystems.

Cadmium is usually present  in the environment in small amounts and is usually associated with zinc.11  Zinc
is considered to be an essential element  for both plants and animals12  and is translocated from the soil
through  various food chains. Under normal  circumstances, the level of cadmium in the environment is
determined  by the geochemical composition  of the region  and is  not high enough to adversely affect the
health of the  indigenous  plant or animal  populations.  Ecological  dangers  from  cadmium exposure,
therefore, arise from activities associated with the production and use of the metal.

The  large variety of sources from which cadmium may enter the environment are discussed in Section 5 of
this  report.  Concentrations  of cadmium in various substances  and plants or animals are listed in Table 8.2.

             Table 8.2. CONCENTRATION OF CADMIUM IN VARIOUS SUBSTANCES11
                                (ppm of dry plant and animal tissue)
Abiotic components
Substance
Igneous rock
Shales
Sandstones
Limestones
Soils
Fresh water
Sea water

Concentration
0.2
0.3
0.05
0.035
0.06
0.08
0.00011

Marine and land plants
Substance
Plankton
Brown algae
Bryophytes
Ferns
Gymnosperms
Angiosperms
Bacteria
Fungi
Concentration
0.4
0.4
0.1
0.5
0.24
0.64
--
4.0
Animals
Substance
Coelenterata
Annelida
Mollusca
Enchinodermata
Crustacea
Insecta
Pisces
Mammalia
Concentration
1
-
3
1
0.15
-
3
-
 The possible avenues of environmental transport of cadmium are shown in Figure 8.1. The term "biota"
 refers  to all living organisms, including humans. Biological organisms may be affected by cadmium intake at
 any of the points listed.
 8-6
CADMIUM

-------
MINING, PROCESSING,
AND INCINERATION'
         FALLOUT
  DUMPING
                                  AIR
         MICROBIAL POPULATIONS
      AND AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES
                           TERRESTRIAL SYSTEM
                                             f
                      LEACHING
                IRRIGATION
                                                    BIOTA
i
                                  FRESH
                                 WATER
                        RIVER
                        FLOW
                 7
                  BIOTA
                                ESTUARIES
                        MIXING
                                           BIOTA
                                 OCEANS
                                                        EVAPORATION
          Figure 8.1.  Environmental transport of cadmium.
                              Effects
                                                 J-7

-------
Studies  and surveys in areas  surrounding smelters have shown decreasing concentrations of zinc and
cadmium in the soil, as well as in plants and animals, with increasing distances from the source.13'14  Leafy
crops show higher levels of cadmium than root crops, probably because of direct deposition.

A study conducted by Dorn et al13 on lead mining in Missouri points out the levels of cadmium, copper,
lead, and zinc that may be added to naturally occurring  levels of these elements in soil and vegetation by
mining processes.  Two farm sites were selected for study: one approximately 0.8 km and the other 26 km
from the smelter stack. Soil and vegetation and hair, blood, and milk from cows were collected from each
farm at three  time periods  during 1  year.  Statistically significant differences in  cadmium levels were
observed between farm sites for the following variables:  soil, roots of vegetation, leaves of vegetation, and
hair collected from cows. The  levels of cadmium  in milk never exceeded 0.5 jug per 100 ml. There was no
significant  difference in cadmium concentrations in milk between  the  farm sites, which would seem to
indicate that cadmium is not  readily assimilated and/or secreted in milk of cows. Vegetation levels were
reported to be between 3 and 10 jug/g of dry weight. Exposure longer than 1 year to the  same levels of
cadmium in vegetation  as these would  probably result in higher levels in milk than reported here, however.

Smith and Huckabee14  report that Munshower in his  studies in Deer Lodge Valley in Southern Montana, an
area near  a smelter,  found soil concentration factors were: 1 for grasses, 2 for forbs, and  1.5 to 3.0 for
insects;  however, concentration factors varied considerably with species. The same study noted an increase
in the concentration of cadmium in the kidney and liver with increasing age in the cattle in the area.

Cadmium is added to  the soil through deposition from the air  and through  addition  of  fertilizers and
pesticides.  The airborne  forms of cadmium also fall on growing  vegetation through precipitation and
dustfall.

The uptake of cadmium by oats was studied  by John et  al.ls The cadmium content of the soil was shown
to markedly affect  the cadmium content of the  roots. Cadmium was translocated to the tops to a lesser
extent.  The type  of soil appeared to affect the movement of cadmium  into the shoots. Oat shoots grown in
Richmond soil with  46.4  ppm of cadmium  contained 16.1 ppm as compared with 0.51 ppm in shoots
grown in soil with cadmium levels of 1.3 ppm. Cadmium levels were measured using  nitric acid extraction.

In another study, John et  al.16 noted that the cadmium content of the plants appeared to be related to the
amounts of exchangeable  cadmium in  the soil rather than  to the total cadmium present in the soil. The
higher levels of cadmium were associated with increased soil acidity.

Lagerwerff17 observed  that large changes in the cadmium content of the soil caused only small increases in
the cadmium content of radish tops; a five-fold increase in  the soil resulted in a two-fold increase in the
tops. The cadmium uptake in  radishes was greater in soil with a pH of 5.9  than in soil with a pH of 7.2.
Also, when plants were grown near a cadmium source, the  aerial deposition accounted for more than 40
percent  of the contents of the tops.

Schroeder and Balassa18 reported cadmium uptake  by 10 garden vegetables-in some, uptake was only by
the roots and in others by the entire plant.

The availability of cadmium to plants is undoubtedly associated with  microbial metabolism. Although the
microbial   metabolism  of zinc  has  been  rather  thoroughly studied,12  that  of cadmium  has  not.
Sulfate-reducing  microorganisms  are known to  have  produced sphalerite from zinc  metal  and  zinc
carbonate.12 Sphalerite ores are a common source of both zinc and cadmium. Zinc carbonate (smithsonite)
occurs  naturally,  although zinc metal  does not.  Sulfate-reducing microorganisms are  also capable of
reducing cadmium carbonate to cadmium sulfate.19

Cadmium behaves differently  when in  the presence of zinc than when alone. Zinc is a cofactor for many
enzymes and without it the enzymes do not  function. Cadmium can replace zinc as a cofactor and thereby
cause many of the enzymes to cease  functioning.14  The presence of zinc in the soil changes cadmium

 8-8                                       CADMIUM

-------
uptake in plants. At low concentrations of cadmium, zinc suppresses its uptake, but at high concentrations
of cadmium the zinc increases uptake.14

Lichens, mosses, leaf litter, and humus tend to accumulate metals deposited on their surfaces.20 The metals
do not appear to penetrate the plant as long as a  cuticle is present. In mosses they tend to accumulate
because of ion exchange.

Accumulations of metals  in leaf litter may be the most serious effect of metal deposition. The effect of
cadmium and other metals on the organisms that decompose leaf litter is not known; however, the blocking
of negatively  charged organic groups by metal ions would decrease the probability of litter decomposition.

Extremely high levels of metals would be required to prevent litter decomposition. The effect of the metals
on the microorganisms that bring about litter decay is not known, but the decomposition of litter is an
integral part  of mineral turnover and  biogeochemical cycling.  Any interference with this cycling  will
produce a profound effect upon terrestrial ecosystems.

The discharge of cadmium into oceans and fresh water streams results in an increase in the cadmium levels
in the organisms living in these waters.14'21   Both marine  and  fresh water  animals are capable of
concentrating cadmium;14'21  however, the  effects of  cadmium  at  sublethel  levels  on  the organisms
themselves are not known.

Present knowledge concerning the ecological effects of cadmium can be summarized as follows:

   •  Data dealing with the effects of cadmium in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems are limited.

   •  Under normal circumstances the level  of cadmium in the  environment  is insufficient to adversely
     affect the health of the indigenous plant  and animal populations.

   •  Organisms living in  the proximity  of cadmium sources have  higher levels of cadmium within their
     bodies than those in non-contaminated areas.

   •  Leafy crops show higher levels of cadmium than root crops, probably because of direct deposition.

   •  The amount of uptake of cadmium from the soil is  determined by  soil type, pH,  amount of
     exchangeable cadmium, and microorganismal activity. The amount of zinc in the soil also influences
     cadmium uptake.

   •  Lichens and mosses  tend to accumulate  metals deposited  on their surfaces. The accumulation results
     from  ion exchange.  The metals do not appear to penetrate the plant as long  as an intact cuticle is
     present.

   •  The accumulation of cadmium and other metals in the leaf litter and humus may be the most serious
     aspect of metal deposition. The  effect of metal  deposition  on litter decomposition and biogeo-
     chemical cycling is not known.

8.3 REFERENCES FOR SECTION 8

 1. Friberg, L., M. Piscator, and G. Nordberg. Cadmium in the Environment. Cleveland, Chemical Rubber
    Co. Press, 1971.

 2. Friberg, L.  Health Hazards  in the Manufacture of Akaline Accumulators with Special Reference to
    Chronic Cadmium Poisoning. Acta. Med. Scand., Suppl. 138:240, 1950.

 3. Piscator,  M., and B. Lind. Cadmium, Zinc, Copper and Lead in Human Renal Cortex.  Arch. Environ.
    Health. 24:426, 1972.

                                            Effects                                          8-9

-------
 4.  Larsson, S.E., and M. Piscator. Effect of Cadmium on Skeletal Tissue in Normal and Calcium-deficient
    Rats. Israel J. Med'. Sci. 7:495, 1971.

 5.  Piscator, M., and S. E.  Larsson. Retention and  Toxicity of Cadmium  in  Calcium-deficient  Rats.
    (Presented at 17th International Congress an Occupational Health, Buenos Aires. 1972.)

 6.  Carroll, R. E. The  Relationship of Cadmium in the Air to Cardiovascular Disease  Death Rates.  J.
    Amer. Med. Assoc. 198:261, 1966.

 7.  Hickey, R. J., E. P. Schoff, and R. L. Clelland. Relationship Between Air Pollution and Certain Chronic
    Disease Death Rates. Arch. Environ. Health. 75:728, 1967.

 8.  Hunt, W. F., C. Pinkerton, O. McNulty, and J. Creason. A Study in Trace Element Pollution of Air  in
    77 Midwestern Cities. In: Trace Substances in Environmental Health. Hemphill, D. D.  (Ed.) Columbia,
    University of Missouri Press, 1971. p. 56-61.

 9.  Hammer, D. L, J. F. Finklea, J. P. Creason, S. H. Sandifer, J. E. Keil, L. E. Priester, and J. F. Stara.
    Cadmium Exposure and  Human Health Effects.  In: Trace  Substances in Environmental  Health.
    Columbia, University of Missouri Press, 1972. p. 269-283.

10.  Friberg, L., M.  Piscator, G. Nordberg, and T.  Kjellstrom. Cadmium in the  Environment,  II. The
    Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. Prepared for the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency,
    Research Triangle Park,  N.C., under Contract No. 68-02-0342. Publication No. EPA-R2-73-190.
    February 1973. 169 p.

11.  Bowen, J. J. M. Trace Elements in Biochemistry. London, Academic Press, 1966. 241 p.

12.  Zaijic, J. E.  Microbial Biogeochemistry. New York, Academic Press, 1969. 345 p.

13.  Dorn, C. R., J. 0. Pierce,  G. R. Chase, and P. E. Phillips.  Study of Lead, Copper, Zinc  and Cadmium
    Contamination  of Food  Chains  of  Man.  University of Missouri, Columbia, Mo. Prepared for  U.  S.
    Environmental  Protection Agency,  Research Triangle  Park, N. C. under Contract No. 68-02-0092.
    1972.

 14. Cadmium: The Dissipated Element.  Fulkerson,  W.,  and H. E. Goeller, (Ed.). Oak Ridge National
    Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn. 1973.

 15. John, M. K., H. H. Chuah, and C. J.  Van Laerhoven. Cadmium Contamination of Soil and Its Uptake
    by Oats. Environ. Sci. and Tech. 6:555-557,  1972.

 16. John, M. K., C. J. Van Laerhoven, and H. H. Chuah. Factors Affecting Plant Uptake and Phytotoxicity
    of Cadmium Added to Soils. Environ. Sci.  and Technol. 6:1005-1009, 1972.

 17. Lagerwerff,  J.V. Uptake  of  Cadmium,  Lead  and Zinc  by  Radish from Soil  and  Air. Soil Sci.
    777:129-133, 1971.

 18. Schroeder, H. A., and J. J.  Balassa.  Cadmium: Uptake by Vegetables from  Superphosphate  in Soil.
    Science. 740:819-820, 1963.

 19. Silverman, M.P., and W. L. Shrlich. Microbial Formation and Degradation of Minerals. Advan. in
    Appl. Microbiol. 6:153-205, 1964.

 20. Pringle, B. H., D. E. Hissong, E.  L. Katz,  and S. T. Mulawka. Trace Metal Accumulation by Estuarine
    Mollusks. J. Sanit. Eng. Div. 94:455475, 1968.

 21. Tyler, G.  Heavy Metals Pollute Nature, May Reduce Productivity. Ambio. 7:52-59, 1972.

 8-10                       ,              CADMIUM

-------
                          9. CONTROL TECHNOLOGY


9.1  AIRBORNE EMISSIONS

Cadmium  emitted  into the atmosphere will generally be in the form of particulate matter-usually as the
oxide,  but also  as the  sulfide  or  sulfate. Because  the boiling point  of cadmium is fairly low, 767°C
(1410°F), the metal  may  be vaporized in high-temperature processes and condensed into particles as the
process off-gases are cooled. This method of formation would result in very fine particles in the micrometer
and submicrometer range.

The exact  size distribution  of cadmium-containing particles from these various processes has, unfortunately,
not been clearly defined. The limited information available  indicates that 40 percent of the particulate mass
may be   smaller  than  2 micrometers  in  diameter. In processes  where  a  large fraction of  the
cadmium-containing particulate is formed  by the vaporization/condensation method, it is  possible that a
significant amount of cadmium may be contained in particulate matter even smaller than 0.1 micrometer.
The shape of the condensed particles is not known, either, although there are indications that the particles
might not always be spherical.  There is evidence that the percentage concentration of cadmium in fly ash is
higher in the finer particles than in the coarser particles.

It is evident,  therefore, that the control of atmospheric cadmium emissions requires the ability to capture
fine particles.

9.2  WATERBORNE EMISSIONS

Waterborne cadmium emissions are generally in the form of suspended particulates, although cadmium may
sometimes  be present in  a soluble form such as cadmium sulfate. These aqueous  emissions may result
directly from various processing steps involving cadmium (such as the aqueous beneficiation of zinc ores or
the spills, washdowns, and rinsings from  cadmium  electroplating  operations) or they may result from
leaching and washing of smelter slag heaps by rainwater.

9.3  CONTROL METHODS

9.3.1  Control of Airborne Cadmium Emissions

The technology currently employed to control cadmium emissions is directed toward control of particulate
matter in  the micrometer range.  The devices most frequently used  are fabric filters and electrostatic
precipitators.  Scrubbers are also  utilized, but  less  often, possibly  because many  sources of cadmium
emissions  must keep the particles  dry for purposes  of recycle to the process. Cyclones,  which are  not
efficient  in collecting fine material, can be  employed only  to remove  the  coarser particulate matter
upstream of one of the other devices.

Reasonably high removal efficiencies for fine particulate matter in the  range of 0.2 to 1.0 micrometer are
possible using existing devices,  either alone or in combination, but only if these devices are large enough,
installed in sufficient number,  supplied with adequate energy, and  operated correctly. The economics of
installing  the  equipment required  to  provide  removals higher  than  those currently achieved by  cadmium
emitters,  will thus be  unfavorable at best, and possibly  prohibitive, depending  upon what  degree of

                                              9-1

-------
additional removal is desired. Research programs currently underway within  EPA are intended to make
greater  control  of  fine  particles  feasible by  improving  the  efficiency  of  control techniques  in  the
submicrometer range at a limited increase, or possibly even at a decrease, in system cost.

Capital costs of completely installed, high-efficiency particulate collection systems vary from about $4 to
$12 per actual cubic foot per minute  (acfm) of gas treated and are highly dependent on the nature of the
source, the efficiency required, and the size of the unit. Complete operating costs, including amortization,
depreciation, and maintenance  can vary from about $0.50  to $5.00/acfm-year. The selection of the most
economical device in any one particular case depends on many factors. '

If, indeed, a significant fraction of cadmium emissions consists of particles smaller than 0.1 micrometer,
then the technology for controlling this fraction of the emissions may not exist  at the present time.

9.3.1.1  Fabric Filters1—Fabric filters, or baghouses, are currently employed  to control many  cadmium
emission sources. This technique involves  passage of the particle-containing gas stream through a porous
filter medium consisting of woven or fibrous fabric. The  fabric may be wood or cotton, or—for higher
temperature and more corrosive environments—may be Dacron, Teflon, glass,  or any of a number of other
materials. The collected particles form a cake on the filter, which must be removed periodically.


Particles are collected via several mechanisms in bag filters. The most important  are:


   •  Direct interception of a particle by the filter (or, more accurately, by the cake of collected particles
      built up  on the filter) as the particle is carried by the gas stream.

   •  Inertia! impaction,  in which the  momentum of entrained particles causes them to leave the gas stream
      and to collide with the filter.

   •  Brownion diffusion of fine particles, causing diffusion of these particles to the surface of the filter.

Fabric filters are efficient for removing fine particles in the micrometer range. There are indications that—if
the appropriate fabric is selected, if the air/cloth  ratio (i.e., the gas velocity) is held sufficiently low, and if
the entire baghouse system is correctly built and maintained leak-free—the fraction collection efficiency of
particles 1.0 micrometer  in size may be as high as 99 percent. Filters employed by some of the emitters of
cadmium do not appear to be designed or  operated to achieve such high efficiencies. Although a correctly
operated baghouse without imperfections  in the filters can be efficient, in practice a large number of filters
are often not in correct working order throughout the entire operating period. Thus collection efficiencies
below the design efficiency are quite possible during operation.

Most  fabric filter bags cannot  be  operated above 284°C (550°F); for this temperature, a glass fabric is
required.  This temperature limitation does not  appear to be a  severe problem in many of  the high-
temperature processes emitting cadmium;  the process off-gases must be cooled before entering the filter
anyway because the filter is frequently followed by a scrubber for S02 removal. The concentrations of S02
expected (e.g., in off-gases from smelter operations) are not believed  to pose a serious problem for filters, so
long as an appropriate fabric is selected.

In summary, the advantages of fabric filtration as a technique for controlling cadmium emissions are:

   •  Filters can be very efficient in removing fine particles on the order of 1.0 micrometer, and possibly
      smaller.

   •  Disturbances in the process operation would not affect filter performance.

The disadvantages of filters are:

9-2                                        CADMIUM

-------
   • Low  air/cloth ratios  are required in order  to reduce  the  pressure  drop and  to  maintain high
     efficiencies (i.e., the baghouse must be large).

   • Pressure  drop across  the  filter  is high  relative to  electrostatic precipitators,  although  low in
     comparison with high-energy scrubbers.

   • Maintenance requirements are high for correct operation.

   • Temperature limitation of fabric filters may limit application in some cases and could result in filter
     damage in the event of a temperature excursion.

   • Fabric filters would be. blinded if the particles were sticky (although this should not be a problem for
     most cadmium emission sources).

   • The efficiency of fabric filters on particles below 0.1 micrometer is not clear.

9.3.1.2  Electrostatic Precipitators'1 -Precipitators, along with fabric filters, are perhaps the most commonly
employed  devices for  removing cadmium-containing particles from  process  off-gases. This  technique
involves: (1) production of  an electric charge  on the particles in the gas  stream,  (2) attraction of the
charged particles toward oppositely charged plates  placed in the gas  stream and  precipitation  of the
particles onto the plates; and (3) removal of the collected material from the plates.

Precipitators can be fairly efficient in  removing fine particles, but not as efficient  as fabric filters. Fine
particles are more difficult to charge than coarser ones; moreover, the fine material migrates more slowly to
the collection  plates,   thus  necessitating a large  plate  area.  For these  reasons, the  capital  cost of a
precipitator increases exponentially with increasing collection  efficiencies. Some precipitators  have been
reported to be  98  percent efficient in collecting particles of 1.0 micrometer in diameter.  It is not apparent,
however, that such high efficiencies on fine particulate matter are frequently attained  with precipitators
employed by cadmium emission sources.

A problem encountered  in  precipitation of cadmium-containing  particles  is the high resistivity of the
particles. Moisture conditioning of  the  inlet gas to  the precipitator may be required for efficient removals.

Like filters, precipitators are limited by a maximum operating temperature. For precipitators, this limit is
currently about 425°C  (800°F). Although it is sometimes advantageous to operate a precipitator near the
maximum  temperature,  most sources  of cadmium emissions should find little difficulty in  operating at
temperatures well below the maximum.

The concentration  of S02  (and  S03)  expected  (for  example, in the off-gases from smelter operations)
should, if anything, aid precipitator performance.

The advantages of precipitators for controlling cadmium emissions are:

   • Precipitators can be relatively  efficient in removing fine particles in  the micrometer  range.

   • Precipitators give  very little pressure drop,  with the result that power consumption is low compared
     to other control devices offering the same removal efficiencies.

The disadvantages are:

   • Precipitators must be  large, because of the low gas velocities required  to maintain high collection
     efficiencies and to prevent reentrainment of collected particles.

   • The efficiency of precipitators on  particles smaller than 0.1 micrometer is not known.

                                       Control Technology                                    9-3

-------
   • The small size and high resistivity of cadmium-containing particles make them difficult to charge.

9.3.1.3 Scrubbers3— Scrubbers are not used as widely for the control of cadmium emissions as are filters
and  precipitators.  One reason for their  more limited application may be  that in  smelters—the  most
significant sources of  cadmium  emissions—the collected particulates must be dry so that they can be
recycled  to the process. With the advent of high-energy, high-efficiency scrubbers, however, these devices
may find increased application in situations where simultaneous removal of particulates  and of SO2  is
desired.

Scrubbers are  available in a number of different  designs, but are generally based upon the principle of
impaction of water droplets against the entrained particles. Scrubbers operating with a very high energy
input to  the water or the gas streams—i.e., scrubbers operating with a pressure drop  on the order of 40 to
100  inches of water-provide significant removal  efficiencies in  the  submicrometer range. For example,
some experience indicates that such high-energy scrubbers may be approximately 99 percent efficient in
removing particles of 1.0 micrometer.

Scrubber efficiency can be improved  in general by increasing the energy input to the devices. Currently
available  high-energy scrubbers supply this energy to the water and gas streams in such  a manner that
particle collection  by the impaction mechanism is increased. It appears, however, that high efficiency in
control of fine particulate matter may be achieved more effectively and more economically if the scrubbers
are designed so that mechanisms in addition to impaction are brought into play-such  as diffusiophoresis,
thermophoresis, and condensation effects.  Scrubbers incorporating these effects—including condensation
scrubbers and charged droplet scrubbers—are still in the development stage.

The advantages of scrubbers are:

   • Small size relative to competing devices.

   • High efficiency in removing particles in the micrometer range.

   • Potential for simultaneous removal of particulate matter and gaseous pollutants.

The disadvantages of scrubbers are:

   • They give a slurry by-product. Consequently, they would complicate  recycling the solids to the
     process  if the scrubber system were  used as  the  primary  control technique, and they would
     necessitate a settling pond or equivalent means for removing the  suspended particulate matter. A
     contaminated water disposal problem may result.

   • The efficiency of scrubbers on particles smaller than 0.1 micrometer is not known.
 9.3.2 Control of Waterborne Cadmium Emissions

 If the cadmium is present in the form of suspended particulate, the aqueous emissions that result directly
 from process operations involving cadmium may be controlled by employing settling ponds or thickeners.
 Filtering or centrifuging the aqueous wastes might also be considered.

 If the cadmium  is present  as a soluble compound, it might  be  removed by  precipitation, followed by
 removal  of the resulting solids.  Alternatively,  the techniques of ion  exchange,  solvent extraction, or
 electrolytic deposition might be employed.

 9-4                                        CADMIUM

-------
9.4 REFERENCES FOR SECTION 9.

 1. Handbook  of Fabric Filter  Technology.  GCA Corporation,  Bedford,  Mass.  Prepared  for  U.S.
   Environmental Protection Agency, Research  Triangle Park, N.C. under Contract Number CPA-22-69-38
   (2 vols.). Publication Number APTD-0690 and APTD-0691. 1970.

 2. Manual of Electrostatic Precipitator Technology. Southern Research Institute, Birmingham, Alabama.
   Prepared  for  U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle  Park, N.C. under Contract
   Number CPA-22-69-73 (3 vols).  1970.

 3. Scrubber  Handbook.  Ambient Purification Technology,  Riverside, Calif. Prepared for U. S. Environ-
   mental Protection  Agency,  Research Triangle Park,  N.C. under Contract Number CPA-70-95 (2  vols).
   Publication Number EPA-R2-118a and b. 1972.

 4. Air Pollution Control Technology and  Cost in Nine Selected Areas.  Industrial Gas Cleaning Institute,
   Stamford, Conn. Prepared  for  U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, N.C.
   under Contract Number 68-02-0301. Publication Number APTD-1555. 1972.
                                     Control Technology                                 9-5

-------
                                  TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing}
 . REPORT NO.
   EPA-600/6-75-003
                                                           I. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSIOWNO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
   Scientific and Technical Assessment Report
      on Cadmium
                                                          5. REPORT DATE
                                                           July 1975
                              6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
 . AUTHOR(S)
                                                          8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORG A_N I ZATI ON NAME AND ADDRESS
   National Environmental Research  Center
   Office of Research and Development
   Environmental  Protection Agency
   Research Triangle Park, North Carolina  27711
                               10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                               1AA001
                                        ROAP No.  26AAA
                               11 CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
                                                           13. TYPE OF RE PORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                                                            Final Report	
                                                          14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
 16. ABSTRACT
        This report is a review and evaluation  of the current knowledge of cadmium  in
   the environment as related to possible  deleterious effects on human health  and
   welfare.   Sources, distribution, measurement,  and control technology are also con-
   sidered.   Cadmium is widely distributed in  the environment.  The air over urban
   areas has contained generally less  than 0.1  microgram per cubic meter  (yg/rn^), 24-
   hour average,  but a 24-hour average  as  high  as 0.73 yg/rrr has been measured in the
   air of a  community with a known cadmium source.   The cadmium content of water
   generally is  less than 1 part per billion although much higher values  have  been
   found.  The cadmium content in foods  varies  widely.  The estimated intake from foods
   is  25 to  75 micrograms per day.  The  human  body  burden of cadmium is cumulative.
   The half-time  of cadmium in man is estimated at  over 10 years,  ^an's  primary
   exposure  is from food, tobacco smoke, water, and ambient air.  Food and tobacco
   smoke are the  major sources except in the immediate vicinity of major  sources of
   atmospheric emissions of cadmium.  Emphysema and other lung diseases have been
   related to industrial exposure to airborne  cadmium, compounds.  Kidney  damage has
   also resulted  from long-term exposure to cadmium.   Animal experiments  link  anemia,
   hypertension,  testicular necrosis, and  carcinogenesis with cadmium exposure.  Cur-
   rent knowledge of the dose-response  relationship does not provide criteria  on which
   to  base standards.	
                               KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
                                             b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                                                                        :. COSATI Field/Group
  Cadmium
  Pollution
  Environmental  biology
  Toxicity
  Cardiovascular disease
  Urological  disease
  Respiratory disease
Chemical analysis
Abatement
Air
Water
Environmental
Envi ronmental
Food
pollution
distribu
         ion
07B 07B
13B 13BJ4D
06F 13B
06T 08H
                                                 06E
                                                 06E
 3. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

  Release unlimited
                  19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
                       Unclassified
                       21. NO. OF PAGES

                             72
                                             20 SECURITY CLASS (This page)
                                                   Unclassified
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
                                           10-1

-------