&EPA
           United States
           Environmental Protection
           Agency
           Environmental Research
           Laboratory
           Duluth MN 55804
EPA-600/9-80-033
July 1980
           Research and Development
Proceedings of the
Second American-
Soviet Symposium
on the Use of
Mathematical
Models to Optimize
Water Quality
Mangement

-------
                RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES

Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, have been grouped into nine series. These nine broad cate-
gories were established to facilitate further development and application of en-
vironmental technology.  Elimination of traditional grouping was consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields.
The nine series are:
      1.  Environmental Health Effects Research
      2.  Environmental Protection Technology
      3.  Ecological  Research
      4.  Environmental Monitoring
      5.  Socioeconomic Environmental Studies
      6.  Scientific and Technical Assessment Reports (STAR)
      7  Interagency Energy-Environment Research and Development
      8.  "Special" Reports
      9.  Miscellaneous Reports
 This document is available to the public through the National Technical Informa-
 tion Service, Springfield, Virginia  22161.

-------
                                                   EPA-600/9-80-033
                                                   July  1980
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND AMERICAN-SOVIET SYMPOSIUM
ON THE USE OF MATHEMATICAL MODELS TO OPTIMIZE WATER QUALITY
                         MANAGEMENT
              Bloom-field Hills, Michigan, USA
                     August 27-30, 1979
                         Edited by

                      Way!and R. Swain
                            and
                    Virginia R. Shannon
             ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
             OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
            U.S.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                  DULUTH,  MINNESOTA  55804

-------
                                 DISCLAIMER
    This report has been reviewed by the Large Lakes Research Station,
Environmental Research Laboratory-Duluth, Grosse lie, Michigan, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, and approved for publication.  Mention  of
trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement  or recom-
mendation for use.
                                     n

-------
                                  FOREWORD
    The Environmental Research Laboratory-Duluth is concerned with the
effects of pollutants on freshwater ecosystems, particularly the Laurentian
Great Lakes.  The development and verification of mathematical models de-
scribing the transport, fate and effects of pollutants in freshwater eco-
systems are carried out at the Large Lakes Research Station at Grosse He,
Michigan.

    A part of this development, calibration and verification activity has
been carried forward in cooperation with scientific personnel from the
Soviet Union under the section entitled, Prevention of Pollution of Lakes
and Estuaries under the Water Pollution Portion of the US-USSR Joint
Agreement on Cooperation in the Field of Environmental Protection.  The
contributions to new knowledge contained in this volume clearly demonstrates
the utility of joint scientific collaborations on an  international basis.
                                            Norbert  Jaworski,  Ph.D
                                            Director
                                            Environmental  Research  Laboratory
                                            Duluth

-------
                                  PREFACE


    This volume contains the proceedings of the papers presented  at  the
Second US-USSR Symposium on the Use of Mathematical Models to Optimize Water
Quality Management.  All of the papers were presented either  in English  or
in Russian with simultaneous interpretation into the corresponding  language
at the Cranbrook Institute of Science in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan,  USA
during August 27-30, 1979.

    Identical copies of this volume are being simultaneously  published in
the Russian language under the direction of Dr. A.M. Nikavorov, Director of
the Institute for Hydrochemistry at Rostov-on-Don  in the USSR.  This  joint
bilingual publication represents a reaffirmation of the continuing commit-
ment pledged by both countries to cooperative environmental activities.

-------
                                 INTRODUCTION
    The Joint US-USSR Agreement on Cooperation  in the  Field  of  Environmental
Protection was established  in May of  1972.  These proceedings result  from
one of the projects, Project 02.02-12, Effects  of Pollutants on  Lakes  and
Estuaries.

    As knowledge related to fate and  transport  of pollutants has  grown,  it
has become increasingly apparent that  local and even national approaches to
solving pollution problems  are  insufficient.  Not only are the  problems
themselves frequently international,  but an understanding of alternate
methodological approaches to the problem can  avoid needless  duplication  of
efforts.  This expansion of interest  from a local and  national  framework
represents a logical and natural maturation from the provincial  to  a  global
concern for the environment.

    In general, mankind is  faced with  very similar environmental  problems
regardless of the national  or political boundaries which we  have  erected.
While the problems may vary slightly  in type  or degree, the  fundamental  and
underlying factors are remarkably similar.  It  is not  surprising, therefore,
that the  interests and concerns of environmental scientists  the world over
are also quite similar.  In this larger sense, we are  our brother's brother,
and have the ability to understand our fellowman and his dilemma, if we  but
take the trouble to do so.  It  is this singular idea of concerned scientists
exchanging views with colleagues that  provides the basic strength for this
project.  While our methods may vary,  our goals are identical,  and therein
lies the value of such a cooperative  effort.
Wayland R. Swain, Ph.D.
Project Officer, U.S. Side

-------
                                  CONTENTS
Foreword	    iii
Preface	    iv
Introduction 	     v
Figures	    ix
Tables	xviii
Acknowledgment 	    xx

     1.  Basic Trends in the Study of Hydrochemical Fields
         and the Structure of Their Space-Time Heterogeneities
           V.L. Pavelko, B.M. Vladimirskiy, I.T. Gavrilov and
           G.V. Tsytsarin	     1

     2.  Modeling the Great Lakes - A History of Achievement
           William C. Sonzogni and Thomas M. Heidtke 	     9

     3.  Data Management Requirements for Great Lakes Water
         Quality Modeling
           William L. Richardson 	    37

     4.  Optimal Sampling for Long Term Trends in Lake Huron
           David M. Dolan	    58

     5.  A Model Approach to Estimating the Effects of Anthro-
         pogenic Influences on the Ecosystem of Lake Baikal
           A.B. Gorstko, Yu.A. Dombrovskiy, V.V. Selyutin,
           F.A. Surkov, A.M. Nikanorov and A.A. Matveev	    71

     6.  Species Dependent Mass Transport and Chemical Equilibria:
         Application to Chesapeake Bay Sediments
           Dominic M. DiToro	    85

     7.  Simulation of the Distribution of Polluted Water in
         Reservoirs From Concentrated Emissions
           A.V. Karaushev and V.V. Romanovskiy	    122

     8.  Results of a Joint USA/USSR Hydrodynamic Modeling Project
         for Lake Baikal
           John F. Paul, Alexandr B. Gorstko and Anton A. Matveyev .  .    129
                                   vn

-------
 9.  The Structure of Hydrochemical Fields and Short-Term
     Prediction
       A.M. Nikanorov, B.M. Vladimirskiy, V.L. Pavelko, Ye.V.
       Melnikov and K.L. Botsenyuk	   156

 10.  Transport of Mining Waste in Lake Superior
       M. Sydor, G.E. Glass and W.R. Swain	   180

 11.  Principle of Organization of an Automated Information
     System
      'V.L. Pavelko	   197

 12.  A Multi-Layered Nested Grid Model of Lake Superior
       G.J. Oman and M. Sydor	   207

 13.  A Review of Some Methods and Parameters Used in Assessing
     Effects of Water Intakes on Fish Populations
       Richard L. Patterson  	   237

 14.  Control of the Water Resources of the Azov Sea Using the
     "Azov Problem" Family of Simulation Systems
       A.B. Gorstko, F.A. Surkov, L.V. Epshteyn and A.A.
       Matveyev	'.	   252

 15.  The Transport of Contaminants in Lake Erie
       Wilbert Lick	   261

 16.  Self-Organization of Three-Dimensional Models of Water
     Pollution
       A.G. Ivakhnenko and G.I. Krotov	   306

 17.  A Spatially-Segmented Multi-Class Phytoplankton Model
     for Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron
       Victor J.  Bierman, Jr. and David M. Dolan	.'   343

18.  A Segmented Model  of the Dynamics of the Ecosystem of
     Lake Baikal  Considering Three-Dimensional Circulation
     of the Water
       V.V. Menshutkin, O.M. Kozhova, L.Ya. Ashchepkova and
       V.A. Krotova	   366

19.  The Task of Optimal  Planning of Discharge of Pollutants
     in a Dynamic Model of Self-Purification of a Body of
     Water
       O.M. Kozhova and L.T. Aschepkova	   379

-------
                                  FIGURES
Section                                                                Page

   1       Variation of level of study of a component with
            interval of sampling  	     5

   3      Great Lakes modeling-management process 	    39

   3      Large Lakes Research Station mini-Storet system 	    45

   3      Summary of Lake Superior data from Storet water quality
            file	    48

   3      Summary of Lake Michigan data from Storet water quality
            file	    49

   3      Summary of Lake Huron data from Storet water quality
            file	 . .  .    50

   3      Summary of Lake Erie data from Storet water quality
            file	    51

   3      Summary of Lake Ontario data from Storet water quality
            file	    52

   3      Summary of Connecting Channels data from Storet water
            quality file	    53

   4      The Lake Huron system	    60

   4      Simplified mass balance model 	    62

   5       Diagram of surface currents in Baikal during the ice-
            free season	    72

   5       Time-series plots of concentrations of an arbitrary
            pollutant in the various regions of Lake Baikal 	    75

   5       Concentration field of a pollutant in the 0-20 m layer
            near BCPC	    77

   5       Diagram of cycle of matter and energy in pelagic Lake
            Baikal	    79

                                    ix

-------
Section                                                                Page

   6      The vertical distribution of sediment organic carbon
            and nitrogen as percent dry weight	     93

   6      Chesapeake Bay Station 856:  Observed and computed
            vertical distribution of total aqueous carbon dioxide,
            aqueous ammonia nitrogen and their ratio   	     98

   6      Chesapeake Bay Station 856:  Observed and computed
            vertical distribution of interstitial water 	    100

   6      The effects of species dependent transport and solid
            phase reactions on net alkalinity	    103

   6      Characteristic shapes for net alkalinity  	    105

   6      Chesapeake Bay Station 858C:  Observed and computed
            vertical distributions of dissolved methane, mg
            carbon/1; total aqueous carbon dioxide, mg carbon/1;
            and total gas phase concentration, moles of gas/1 of
            gas plus aqueous phase volume	    108

   6      Chesapeake Bay Station 858C:  Observed and computed
            vertical distributions of dissolved nitrogen gas, mg
            nitrogen/1; dissolved argon, mg argon/1; and mole
            ratio	    109

   6      The effect of an upward gas phase velocity	    Ill

   6      The effect of an upward gas phase velocity with zero
            boundary conditions 	    112

   6      The effect of an upward gas phase velocity with zero
            lower boundary conditions 	    113

   7      Diagram for calculating the diffusion of pollutants in
            an aquatic ecosystem  	    124

   8      Lake Baikal	    131

   8      Frequency of winds over Lake Baikal'in the summer  and
            autumn	    137

   8      Hydrodynamic model calculation for  Lake Baikal with
            southwest wind	    139

   8      Hydrodynamic model calculation for  Lake Baikal with
            southwest wind	    140

   8      Hydrodynamic model calculation for  Lake Baikal with
            northwest wind	    141

-------
Section                                                                 Page

   8      Hydrodynamic model calculation for Lake Baikal with
            northwest wind	    142

   8      Observed surface currents in the Selenga River Region
            of Lake Baikal	    143

   8      Lake Baikal whole lake dominant currents   	    145

   8      Dispersion model calculation for Lake Baikal with
            southwest wind	    146

   8      Dispersion model calculation for Lake Baikal with
            southwest wind	    147

   8      Dispersion model calculation for Lake Baikal with
            southwest wind	    148

   8      Dispersion model calculation for Lake Baikal with
            southwest wind	    149

   8      Sample results from Hydromet cruise in Selenga Shallows
            on 28-29 May 1976	    150

   8      Sample results from Hydromet cruise in Selenga Shallows
            on 28-29 May 1976	    151

   8      Landsat satellite image of Lake Baikal  	    153

   9      Berezina River at Gorval, 1951-1956 	    165

   9      Berezina River at Gorval, 1951-1956 	    168

   9      Berezina River at Bobruysk  	    170

   9      Sula River at Zelenkova	    171

  10      Study area showing the outline of a deep trough where
            tailings are discharged and the discharge source loca-
            tion at Silver Bay	    181

  10      Comparison at Duluth of the measured winds and wind
            function used for modeling of Lake Superior for the
            November 1975 storm	    184

  10      Comparison at Duluth of the measured water level fluctu-
            ations with the fluctuations derived from the numeri-
            cal model  of Lake Superior for the November 1975
            storm wind	    185

  10      Water transport due to westerly wind stress 	    187

                                    xi

-------
Section                                                                Page

  10      Calculated transports for November 13, 1975 showing
            water movement for high fetch northeasterly winds ....   188

  10      Numerical simulation of the plume of mining waste from
            point source at Silver Bay, Minnesota	   190

  10      Turbidity vs. Landsat Band 4 intensity above background .  .   191

  10      Turbidity plume derived from Landsat data for November
            14, 1975	  .   192

  10      Discrete patches of upwelled tailings observed in
            Landsat data for July 2 and 3, 1973	   195

  11      Variation in number of errors v with time of continuous
            work t	   203

  12      Grids used in various models	   208

  12      Map of Lake Superior showing regions deeper than 200 m  .  .   215

  12      Surface currents after 3 hours o' constant easterly
            winds	   216

  12      Surface currents after 9 hours of constant easterly
            winds . .'	   217

  12      Surface currents after 15 hours of constant easterly
            winds	' .  . .  .   218

  12      Surface currents after 24 hours of constant easterly
            winds	   219

  12      Currents in layer 2 after 24 hours of constant easterly
            winds	  .   220

  12      Currents in layer 3 after 24 hours of constant easterly
            winds .	   221

  12      Currents in layer 4 after 24 hours of constant easterly
            winds	   222

  12      Layer 2 downdwelling in western Lake Superior  after 24
            hours of constant easterly winds  ............   223

  12      Layer 2 upwelling in western Lake Superior after 24
            hours of constant easterly winds	   224

  12      Surface currents in nested subgrid after  24 hours of
            constant easterly winds 	  . 	   225

                                    xii

-------
Section                                                                 Page

  12      Layer 2 currents  in nested subgrid  after  24  hours  of
            constant easterly winds  	    226

  12      Surface currents  in nested subgrid  after  24  hours  of
            constant westerly winds  	    227

  12      Layer 2 currents  in nested subgrid  after  24  hours  of
            constant westerly winds  	    228

  13      Box and arrow diagram summarizing transfers  of  fish
            biomass	    240

  14      Diagram of regions of the Azov Sea	    256

  14      Program structure of the "Azov Sea"  SS	    259

  15      Lake Erie bottom  topography	    262

  15      Settling velocity versus percent of  suspended sediment
            for the Western Basin sediment  	    265

  15      Side view of the  flume	    270

  15      Example of the concentration time history data  for the
            shallow-based sediment with TW = 0.92 dynes/cm^  and
            a water content of 6.7%	    272

  15      The entrainment rate as a function of the average  bound-
            ary shear stress for the shale-based, Western Basin,
            and Central Basin sediments 	    273

  15      The entrainment rate as a function of shear  stress of a
            linear scale for the Western Basin sediment 	    274

  15      The reflectivity  parameter as a function of  shear  stress
            for the shale-based, Western Basin, and Central  Basin
            sediments	    275

  15      Friction coefficient as a function of Reynolds  number
            for an oscillatory flow over a smooth bottom	    277

  15      Significant wave  height in meters for a wind speed of
            11.2 m/sec (25 mi/hr) and a southwest wind	    278

  15      Significant wave  period in seconds for a wind stress of
            11.2 m/sec (25 mi/hr) and a southwest wind	    279

  15      Bottom stress in  dynes/cm2 for a winds speed of 11.2
            m/sec (25 mi/hr) and a southwest wind   	    280


                                   x i i i

-------
Section
15

15

15

15

15

15

15

15

15

15

15

15

15

15

15

15

15


Near-surface total suspended solids map for the Western
Basin of Lake Erie on March 8, 1976 	
Observed surface sediment concentrations for the Western
Basin of Lake Erie on March 11, 1976 	
Calculated surface sediment concentrations on the Western
Basin of Lake Erie on March 11, 1976 	
Temperature distribution at 30 days for constant depth
basin 	
Velocities (u and w) at 30 days for constant depth
basin 	
Velocities perpendicular to cross-section at 30 days for
constant depth basin 	
Temperature distribution at 90 days for constant depth
basin 	
Velocities (u and w) at 90 days for constant depth
basin 	
Velocities perpendicular to cross-section at 90 days for
constant depth basin 	
Temperature distribution at 50 days for variable depth
basin 	
Velocities (u and w) at 50 days for variable depth
basin 	
Velocities perpendicular to cross-section at 50 days for
variable depth basin 	
Temperature distribution at 80 days for variable depth
basin 	
Temperature distribution at 120 days for variable depth
basin 	
Temperature distribution at 150 days for variable depth
basin 	
Temperature distribution at 180 days for variable depth
basin 	
Contaminant concentration at 30 days after release at
surface and 53 km from left side 	
Page

282

283

284

287

288

289

290

291

292

294

295

296

297

298

299

300

302
XIV

-------
Section                                                                 Page

  16      Characteristic curves of change of external, mixed  and
            internal criterion with increasing complexity of  model
            structure	    308

  16      Use of simple models for extrapolation of the area  of
            pollution between three measurement stations 1, 2 and
            3 in the direction of the x-axis	    313

  16      Run-through of simple models and production of data
            tables for the prediction problem 	    316

  16      Run-through of simple models of diagonal shape and  pro-
            duction of data tables for the prediction problem ....    317

  16      Selection of a model of optimal complexity based on the
            combined criterion  	    320

  16      Change of emission and concentration of pollutants  with
            time	    331

  16      Model 1-1	    332

  16      Model II-l  	    333

  16      Model II-2	    335

  16      Model II-3	    336

  16      Model III-l	    337

  16      Model III-2	    339

  16      Model III-3	    340

  17      Saginaw Bay and the spatial segmentation scheme used for
            the phytoplankton model 	    344

  17      Sampling station network in Saginaw Bay 	    346

  17      Gradient among spatial segments in annual average
            chloride concentration  	    348

  17      Gradient among spatial segments in annual average
            phosphorus concentration  	    349

  17      Gradient among spatial segments in summer average
            chlorophyll  jj concentration	    350

  17      Schematic diagram of principal model compartments and
            interaction pathways  	    351

                                    xv

-------
Section
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
18
18
18
18
18
19
19

Comparison between model output and field data for
Comparison between model output and field data for
Comparison between model output and field data for
biomass of non-Nz-fixing blue-greens in segment two ...
Comparison between model output and field data for
Comparison between model output and field data for
Comparison between model output and biomass of green
Comparison between model output and field data for
biomass of non-N2-fixing blue-greens in segment four . .
Comparison between model output and field data for
biomass of N2-fixing blue-greens in segment four ....
Comparison between model output and field data for
dissolved ortho-phosphorus in segment two 	
Comparison between model output and field data for
dissolved ortho-phosphorus in segment four 	
Regional ization of Lake Baikal in the model and
direction of horizontal transfer 	
Geostrophic circulation on the surface of Baikal and
depth of circulation average for August-September
1925-1965 	
Diagram of horizontal exchange between segment in
model 	
Horizontal distribution of phytoplankton throughout
the year in the 0-50 m layer (generated by model) ....
Distribution of phytoplankton in Lake Baikal in the
0-25 m layer in 1964 	
i . = ( i i . i „ . i ~ . i , ) 	
Temperature curve 	
Page
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
363
364
368
369
373
375
376
383
383
XVI

-------
Section                                                                Page
  19      Subdivision of body of water into chambers  	   383
  19      Diagram of water exchange 	   383
  19      Picture of propagation of a pollutant through a body of
            water corresponding to optimal discharge levels 	   389
                                    xvii

-------
                                   TABLES
Section                                                                 Page
   2      Summary of Water Quality Model Relevant to the Great
            Lakes	     11
   2      Summary of Circulation/Transport Models Relevant to the
            Great Lakes	     14
   2      Summary of Available Heat Dispersion, Nonpoint Source,
            Toxic Substances and Miscellaneous Models Relevant
            to the Great Lakes	     16
   3      Summary of Principal Model Characteristics  	     42
   3      Summary of Great Lakes Data in Storet	     47
   3      Storet Water Quality File Summary of Great Lakes
            Eutrophication Data	     54
   4      Lake Huron Major Inflows and Outflows 	     59
   4      Chemical and Biological Indicators of Trophic Status -
            Main Lake Huron	     61
   4      Lake Huron Surveillance Plan Trend Detection Capa-
            bilities  	     65
   4      Sensitivity Analysis for Standard Error in Southern
            Lake Huron for Total Phosphorus 	     67
   4      Comparison of Stations Required by Different Strategies  .  .     68
   5      Morphometric Characteristics of Lake Baikal 	     71
   5      Biotic Balance of the Pelagic Ecosystem of Lake Baikal   .  .     78
   6      Chemical Fast Reactants Structure and Aqueous Diffusion
            Coefficients   	       RQ
   6      Chesapeake Bay Sediment Parameters  	     92
   6      Sediment Electron and Nitrogen Stoichiometry   	     95
                                   xv i i i

-------
Section                                                                 Page

   6      Station Sediment Parameters 	     96

   8      Annual Average Water Balance for Lake Baikal During the
            Period 1901-1970  	    130

   8      Parameters for Lake Baikal Hydrodynamic Model  	    136

   9      Factor Solution for the Results of Chemical Analysis of
            Water Samples of the Gorky Reservoir in 1954-1958 ....    158

   9      Factor Solution for Results of Chemical Analysis of
            Water Samples of Tributaries of the Gorky Reservoir,
            1954-1958	    159

   9      Factor Solution for Results of Chemical Analysis of
            Water Samples from Kuybyshev Reservoir, 1954-1961 ....    160

   9      Factor Solution for Results of Chemical Analysis of
            Water Samples from Kuybyshev Reservoir Taken Near
            Vyazovyye (Volga River) and Sokoli Gory (Kama River)
            and Near Komsomolskiy (Tailwater), 1958-1959  . 	    161

   9      Factor Solution for Results of Chemical Analysis of
            Water Samples of Tributaries of the Volga River and
            Kuybyshev Reservoir, 1954-1961  	    162

   9      Factor Solution for Results of Chemical Analysis of
            Water Samples from Volgograd Reservoir, 1954-1961 ....    163

   9      Factor Solution for Results of Chemical Analysis of
            Water Samples from Tributaries of Volga River Below
            Kuybyshev Reservoir, 1954-1961  	 . .    164

   9      Factor Solution for Results of Analysis of Water Samples
            of Gorval'Tributary, Berezina River, 1951-1956  	    166

   9      Factor Solution for Results of Analysis of Water Samples
            from Bobrusk Tributary of Berezina River, 1957-1973  ...    167

  10      Comparison of Currents Near Duluth	    186

  10      Comparison of Currents Near Silver Bay	    186

  10      Band Combinations for Signature Classification of
            Contaminants  	    193

  17      Statistical Comparison Between Model Output and Field
            Data	    353
                                    xix

-------
                              ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    In any project of the scope and complexity of this effort, the  Project
Officers become increasingly indebted to a large number of  individuals  who
contribute their time and effort with no thought of personal gain.   Un-
fortunately, the list of persons who materially aided the effort  is  too ex-
tensive to allow a complete discussion.  However, while those persons who
made outstanding contributions to the success of this project are acknow-
ledged below, the editors also wish to thank all those others, both  Soviet
and American, whose efforts and assistance smoothed the way to a  satisfac-
tory completion of this phase of the project.

    Sincere thanks are extended to Mr. Igor Kozak, Mr. Igor Korobovsky,  and
Ms. Nina Ivanikiw whose assistance with translations and interpretation  at
the time of presentation have made possible the publication of this  volume.
The substantial contributions and tireless efforts of Ms. Debra Caudill  to
the preparation of the proceedings are acknowledged with deep appreciation.

    It is also impossible to ignore the sustained interest and deep  commit-
ment to this effort made by Edward Lerchen, Acting President, and his staff
at Cranbrook Institute of Science.  Particularly, the planning of Dr. V.
Elliott Smith and the implementation of efforts provided by Millicent
Worrell were far above and beyond the call of duty.  It was the contribu-
tions of these, and a host of others at the Cranbrook Institute which made
the symposium so successful.
                                     xx

-------
                                 SECTION  1

   BASIC TRENDS IN THE STUDY OF HYDROCHEMICAL FIELDS AND THE  STRUCTURE OF
                      THEIR SPACE-TIME HETEROGENEITIES

          V.L. Pavelko1, B.M. Vladimirskiyl, I.T. Gavrilov2
                           and G.V. Tsytsarin2


    Currently the basic task of hydrochemical research is the development of
prognostic and functional models of water quality.  These models must corre-
spond to the requirements not only of operational evaluation, but also of
quality control, i.e., providing the necessary information for making the
corresponding administrative and scientific-technical decisions.  To do
this, one must have full and representative data on the quality of water,
and the nature of its changes in time and space to understand the processes
which determine water quality.  These data, naturally, should be obtained at
minimum cost.  This statement, while obvious, is still improper, due to the
following factors:

    a)  The increasing difficulty of obtaining objective data describing
        mean and extreme values of water quality indices;

    b)  The set of tasks which must be performed, for which the concept
        of "water quality" is ambiguous, and in relationship to which
        the "completeness and representativeness" of the information
        must be evaluated, with an ever-increasing list of substances
        which are limited in terms of maximum allowable concentrations;

    c)  The lack of any scientifically well-founded criteria or methods
        for estimation of the "minimum cost".

    Each of these factors is worthy of extensive discussion in both the
theoretical and the practical aspects.  In the present article, however,
discussion is limited to the following considerations:
iHydrochemical Institute, 192/3 Stachky Prospect; 344090 Rostov-on-Don,
 USSR.

^Moscow State University, Lennin Hills, Moscow, USSR.

-------
    1.  Under natural conditions, water quality parameters usually vary
        in diurnal, seasonal or annual cycles, which may be disrupted
        by hydrochemical factors.  The existing system of observations
        produces more or less reliable information.  As the influence
        of man becomes stronger, the quality of water undergoes great
        changes, the amplitude of which increases greatly.  In reser-
        voirs and streams, flows of varying density with small degrees
        of mixing are seen.  Thus, concentrations may vary by orders of
        magnitude when measured at points not greatly separated.  Many
        pollutants do not move in the same way through bodies of water.
        The concept of "lag time" for water quality may differ signifi-
        cantly, since the speed of a stream varies greatly with depth.
        The hydrochemical lag time may also include a component of re-
        laxation.  Naturally, under these conditions the reliability of
        the information produced is determined in the first stage—as a
        sample is taken.  Depending on the task at hand, the sampling
        system must assure either the maximum possible averaging over
        time and space coordinates, or the selection of samples in ex-
        treme situations.  The development of such a system requires
        the accumulation of data on structures, and space-time hetero-
        geneity of hydrochemical fields for typical aquatic systems.

    2.  The use of the concept of "minimum costs" involves the solution
        of optimization problems, but leaves unanswered a primary ques-
        tion:  "Can new costs be correlated with old costs, or must the
        cost of losses prevented be considered as well?"  A comparison
        with future costs may also be made, if mankind will be forced
        to rehabilitate or restore certain ecologic niches.

    It follows then that optimization of the system of observations cannot
be absolute and final, and that suboptimal solutions should be sought for
specific problems which are pressing for the present period of development
of society.  These solutions should be systematically reviewed, following
development and application of new achievements in science and technology.
At the present time, obviously, it would be most expedient to:

    a)  limit consideration to the present level of costs, or plan in-
        creased costs within limits of the same scale;

    b)  consider that the functional weights of the observed components
        of chemical composition within the limits of the vector of
        states are characterized by a definite hierarchy, e.g., used in
        producing a generalized water quality index (Vainer 1975).

    Under these conditions, the task of equalization of the degree of hydro-
chemical study of components, locally homogeneous regions, and the signifi-
cance of periods and phases of processes is formulated (equalization of
residual entropy in space and time and with respect to weights of the compo-
nents observed).

    To perform this task, it is necessary to consider the following:

-------
    1)  estimate the space and time study level of each component
        given the existing parameters of the observation system;

    2)  find the mean level of study, and estimate its sufficiency
        for the performance of the task at hand;

    3)  find the variation in the level of study with the space-time
        scanning step; and

    4)  redistribute the equipment of the observation network, in order
        to achieve a space-time level of study of each component agree-
        ing with its weighted significance.

    The practical achievement of these stages of the program requires mas-
sive detailed studies of typical hydraulic projects encompassing character-
istic periods and phases of the operating mode, and the use of water quality
indices.  Bodies of water can be classified by means of pattern recognition
algorithms, using data files which have been collected, a priori concepts
from theoretical hydrochemistry, and the data used to classify sources of
pollution.  The selection of typical components of chemical composition can
be based on the minimum mean-square deviation of the distance (X) of compo-
nent (K) from the center of the grouping.  The search for quasi-steady sec-
tions of a body of water, incorporating periods and phases can be conducted
analogously (Rybnikov 1970; Borishanskiy 1970; Pavelko 1972).

    These functions should be performed in the first stage of operation of
the program.  After standardization and selection of representative objects,
their hierarchical ranking, evaluation of priorities, ordering of the in-
vestigation is planned in the second stage as a function of the significance
of the object.  Finally, the plans for development of the national economy,
the degree of pollution of the water, the readiness of individual observa-
tion subdivisions, and the conduct of planned studies are incorporated as
the third stage in the program.

    The fourth stage consists of determination of the variation of the
degree of study of a given component with the interval of sampling, and in-
formation in the coordinates of space and time, using the following arbi-
trary system:

    x - distance along a stream or the longest axis of a body of water;
    y - distance transverse or across the stream or body of water;
    z - depth;
    t - time.

    The characteristics of the degree of study which have been suggested
(Popov 1953; Linnik 1958; Margolin 1962; Margolin 1965; Pavelko 1972;
Pavelko 1977) include the structural function, the spectral density of dis-
persion or an estimate such as:
    °c

-------
which can be transformed to an estimate of the  degree  of  study:


    1 = 1-^.                                                          (2)
    The graph of the variation of the degree of  study  (I)  with  the  interval
of sampling of information (T) is shown in Figure  1.

    Based on such functions for each of the components  of  a  body of water
which  is studied, for its quasi-steady regions,  for phases and  periods,  and
considering the actual interval of sampling of information,  it  is possible
to estimate the degree of heterogeneity of the level of  study of a  body  of
water  for each component.  This material can be  used as  a  basis  for develop-
ment of recommendations for improvement of the observation system.   The
parameters of the observation systems can be adjusted to assure  identical
levels of study, e.g., equal to the average of all existing  levels  of  study,
or corresponding to some other comparative level,  i.e.,  0.7, 0.8 (see  Figure
1), if this level is considered necessary and sufficient for the present
stage.  These functions can be used to select representative sections  and
times  for sampling, and to provide a basis for the volume  and degree of
averaging of samples.  It would be quite desirable to supplement the graphs
of the level of study with the cost of observation, as  a function of the
frequency of sampling (interval of information collection),  and  the accuracy
of measurements performed.  This will allow a rather precise representation
of the "value of information", which is necessary  to solve the  problem of
cost minimization.

    Obviously, these studies should be performed systematically  in  order to
improve the system of observation and measurement  for preventing pollution
and for subsequent prediction.  The most difficult and  responsible  stage
will obviously be the third stage — the conduct of studies.

    The method of investigation must involve the collection  of  a large
quantity of observed data on an expanding list of  components in  various
bodies of water or parts of bodies of water during various periods  and
phases.  Thus, the observation equipment must be highly  productive, with low
inertia and cost.  The use of automated in situ, high time resolution  equip-
ment is desirable.  The following systems can be used:

    a)  The "cross"-placement of a series of units of sensors along
        the x and y axes in a body of water at a fixed  depth;

    b)  the "garland"-placement of sensors at various depths to  per-
        form synchronous observations along the  z  axis;

-------
    1.0
CO
LU
>
UJ
                                               TIME  (r)
         Figure 1.  Variation of level  of study  of  a component with interval of sampling.

-------
    c)  the "cross-garland"-placement of a number of clusters of
        sensors at points along the x and y axes;

    d)  the "transverse-garland"-placement of sensor clusters across
        of a body of water;

    e)  an on-board automated continuous recording instrument for the
        conduct of observations in the x and y directions with fixed
        depth of sensors from a vessel.  Depth observations (in the z
        direction) can also be made with the vessel on station by low-
        ering and raising a group of sensors;

    f)  the mobile hydrochemical laboratory (truck and trailer with
        light boat), which may be shifted to any desired observation
        point.  The boat is used to place the sensors, while the re-
        cording units are located in the trailer, and the laboratory
        is in the body of the truck.

    The methods and techniques of in situ automated measurements, which form
the basis of such systems, have been previously reported (Gavrilov 1977).  A
set of the hardware required has been tested in the Moscow River and in the
reservoirs of this system.  The data produced have shown that automated mea-
surements in situ, even of a comparatively small number of parameters (5-7),
can greatly increase the effectiveness of a system of observation and mea-
surement of pollutants.

    Calculations have shown that the area of spatial interpolation for
various components differs by an order of magnitude.  With identical density
of the network and frequency of sampling, the spatial resolution of obser-
vations of oxygen and BOD  may contain an error of up to 25 percent.  When
petroleum products are considered, the error may be up to 100 percent, and
for other components, as high as 70 percent.  The time resolution of obser-
vations of oxygen may sometimes contribute a significant degree of error.
Automated observations have recorded a case in which, as an internal wave
moved through a reservoir at a depth of 3 m, the oxygen content dropped in
a period of one hour, from 20 mg/liter (over 200 percent supersaturation) to
a life threatening 4 mg/liter (Tsytsarin 1975).  These data confirm the need
for performance of the studies described.  It is suggested that reference
points be created for the performance of studies in priority regions, from
which methodologic and technical guidance could be provided.  The observa-
tions would be performed by the efforts of special mobile hydrochemical de-
tachments.

    In the USSR, the planning and performance of observations, as well as
the processing and interpretation of the data produced, should be performed
with the participation of the Hydrochemical Institute, Moscow State Univer-
sity, and the Scientific Research Institute of Neurocybernetics of Rostov
State University, since all of these organizations share common scientific
views concerning the means and methods for performance of the task.

-------
REFERENCES

Borishanskiy, L.S.  1970.  The problem of effective placement of water tem-
    perature and sea level observation points in the littoral zone.  Tr.
    GOIN-Statisticheskaya obrabotka okeanograficheskikh dannykh, Moscow,
    Gidrometeoizdat Press, No. 99, pp. 34-48.

Gavrilov, I.G. and G.G. Shinkar.  1977.  Automated installation for in situ
    recording of certain physical-chemical properties of natural waters.
    Gidrokhimich. mat. vol. 70, Leningrad, pp. 75-83.

Linnik, Yu.V. and A.P. Khusu.  1958.  Some considerations on statistical
    analysis of nonuniformity of a polished profile.  Sb. Vzaimozamenyae-
    most1, tochnost1 i metody izmereniya v mashinostroyenii (Handbook on
    interchangeable, accuracy and methods of measurement in machine build-
    ing), Mashgiz Press, 47, pp. 144-146.

Margolin, A.M.  1962.  An analytic method of determination of the accuracy
    of mine-geometric plans.  Vopr. marksheyderii i gornoy geometrii v
    neftegazodobyvayuschchey promyshlennosti (Problems of mine surveying
    and mine geometry in the oil and gas industry), Moscow, Gostoptekhizdat
    Press, pp. 210-226.

Margolin, A.M.  1965.  Variability of oil and gas deposits and estimates of
    the error in results of their prospecting.  Sb. Otsenka tochnosti
    opredeleniya parametrov zalezhey nefti i gaza (Estimate of the accuracy
    of determination of the parameters of oil and gas deposits), Moscow,
    Nedra Press, pp. 178-190.

Pavelko, V.L., V.M. Kalinchenko, and V.S. Baronov.  1972.  Sovershenstvo-
    vaniye metodov marksheyderskikh rabot i geometrizatsii nedr (Improve-
    ment of methods of mine surveying and geometric measurements beneath
    the earth), Moscow, Nedra Press, pp. 269-279 and 238-246.

Pavelko, V.L.  1977.  Variability and levels of study.  Geometrizatsiya
    mestorozhdeniy poleznykh iskopayemykh (Geometric measurements of de-
    posits of useful minerals), Ed. V.A. Bukhrinskiy and Yu.V. Korobchenko,
    Moscow, Nedra Press, pp. 95-113.

Popov, Ye.I.  1953.  Estimating the accuracy of hipsometric plans of de-
    posits.  Zapiski Leningradskogo gornogo instituta, Vol. 37, No. 1.

Rybnikov, A.A., Ye.V. Markevich and N.V. Mertsalova.  1970.  Methods of cal-
    culation of the discreteness of observations in the ocean.  Tr. GOIN-
    Statisticheskaya obrabotka okeanograficheskikh dannykh, No. 99, pp. 5-
    24.

Tsytsarin, G.V.  1975.  The reliability of estimates of water quality based
    on single samples.  Vestn. MGU, ser. geografich., Moscow State Univer-
    sity, No. 4, pp. 43-50.

-------
Velner, Kh.A., V.I. Gurarii and A.S. Shayn.  1975.  Determination of water
    quality criteria in streams for the control of water conservation
    systems.  Materials of Soviet-American Symposium "Use of mathematical
    models for optimization of water quality control", Kharkov-Rostov n/D.

-------
                                 SECTION 2

            MODELING THE GREAT LAKES - A HISTORY OF ACHIEVEMENT

                William C. Sonzogni and Thomas M. Heidtke1


INTRODUCTION

    The North American Great Lakes, which border the United States  and
Canada, are a unique system.  The largest body of fresh water on earth, the
Great Lakes contain 20 percent of the world's fresh water.  Lake Superior,
the largest of the North American Great Lakes, is the  largest lake  in the
world in terms of surface area, and only Lake Baikal and Lake Tanganyika are
larger in terms of total volume.

    The watershed of the North American Great Lakes are heavily developed,
at least in the southern portions.  For this reason the lakes have  been sub-
ject to considerable pollution.  Since the lakes are a valuable natural re-
source and provide drinking water to 70 percent of the region's population
(approximately 30 million), the governments of the United States and Canada
have been sensitive to pollution problems.  As a result, considerable effort
has been devoted to the study of water quality/quantity phenomena in the
Great Lakes basin.  Mathematical modeling has played an important role in
this research, as evidenced by the large number of different models which
have been used to investigate various aspects of the lakes.  In fact, the
Great Lakes are among the most widely modeled bodies of water in the world.

    Importantly, many of the modeling studies have been successful  in terms
of the valuable information and insights they have provided for making plan-
ning and management decisions.  These applications of mathematical models to
the Great Lakes system, which are likely to be relevant to the study of
other large bodies of water throughout the world, have also influenced sub-
sequent modeling research by revealing the limitations and shortcomings of
existing modeling technology.
^Great Lakes Basin Commission, 3475 Plymouth Road, P.O. Box 999, Ann Arbor,
 Michigan 48106.

-------
REVIEW OF PAST MODELING EFFORTS

    As a first step in evaluating the capabilities and potential utility of
mathematical models in the planning and management process for the Great
Lakes, a literature review was initiated.  The review focused on models and/
or modeling activities which have been specifically designed for analysis of
Great Lakes water quality/quantity problems, as well as those models which
may be easily modified for application to the lakes.  The primary objectives
of this review were:  (1) to supplement and update other Great Lakes
modeling reviews completed several years ago (Hydroscience 1972; Tetra Tech
1974); and  (2) to identify areas of relative strength and weakness in using
current modeling technology to assist in the study of specific Great Lakes
problems.

    In order to isolate those models which may be appropriately applied to a
particular water quality/quantity phenomena within a given region of the
total basin, several broad categories were defined and used to group models
having similar characteristics.  These categories are:

    1.  Water Quality Models
    2.  Circulation/Transport Models
    3.  Heated Effluent Dispersion Models
    4.  Toxic Substances Models
    5.  Nonpoint Source Models
    6.  Other Models

    Using these six headings for delineating model types, the results of the
review indicated that well over a hundred mathematical models have been
developed during the past 15 years.  The major thrust of this modeling re-
search has been in the areas of water quality (primarily eutrophication) and
lake circulation or hydrodynamics.  Because of the relatively large number
of models which have been developed and applied in the study of Great Lakes
water quality conditions and circulation patterns, these models have been
further categorized in Table 1 through 3 on the basis of previous applica-
tions to specific lake basins.  Tables 1 and 2 present summary information
specifically on water quality and circulation/transport models, respec-
tively.  Table 3 incorporates information on heat dispersion, nonpoint
source and toxic chemical models, as well as a number of miscellaneous
models that are relevant to large lakes.  It should be stressed that models
listed under a given lake heading (Tables 1 and 2) have been calibrated and/
or verified for this particular lake; this does not imply that the same
model cannot be calibrated, verified and applied in the study of other
lakes.  A brief-discussion of the modeling review is given below for each of
the six different model'classifications.  Detailed information on each model
covered by the review is contained in Heidtke (1979).

Water Quality Models

    Examination of Table 1 reveals that water quality models have been most
frequently applied to study eutrophication in Lake Ontario, Lake Michigan
and Lake Huron.  These models have been generally used to evaluate average,
whole-lake effects for individual basins or their major embayments, e.g.,

                                     10

-------
     TABLE 1.  SUMMARY OF WATER QUALITY  MODELS  RELEVANT TO THE GREAT LAKES
Model Type"
                              Lake  Superior
                                   Lake Michigan
Eutrophication Models
  Whole-Lake Effects
Great Lakes Total Phosphorus
Model (Chapra 1977)

Modified Great Lakes Total
Phosphorus Model
(Brandstetter et al. 1973)
                                                          Grand  Traverse Bay
                                                          Phytoplankton  Model
                                                          (Canale  e_t  al_. 1973)

                                                          Phytoplankton-Based
                                                          Food Web Model
                                                          (Canale  et  al_. 1976)

                                                          Phosphorus  Residence
                                                          Time Model  (Sonzogni,
                                                          et  al_.  1976)

                                                          Green  Bay Water
                                                          Quality  Model  - GBQUAL
                                                          (Patterson, et al.
                                                          1975)

                                                          MICH 01]

                                                          Integral  Primary Pro-
                                                          duction  Model  (Fee,
                                                          1973)
  Nearshore  Effects
                                Grand Traverse Bay
                                Phytoplankton Model
                                (Canale et al_. 1973)

                                Green Bay Water
                                Quality Model - GBQUAL
                                (Patterson e_t al.
                                1975).
Conservative
  Substances
Great Lakes Chloride Model
(O'Connor and Mueller 1970)
                                                       Lake  Reactor  Model
Other Water Quality
Organic Carbon Budget Model
(Maier and Swain 1978)
                                                       Grand  Traverse Bay
                                                       Coliform  Model
                                                       (Canale et  al. 1973)
                                         11

-------
                              TABLE  1  (CONTINUED)
Lake Huron/Saginaw Bay
       Lake  Erie
   Lake  Ontario
Great Lakes Total Phosphorus
Model (Chapra  1977)

Modified Great  lakes Total
Phosphorus Model
(Brandstetter e_t a]_. 1973)

Vollenweider Nutrient Load-
ing Model (Vollenweider
1968)

Modified Vollenweider Nutri-
ent Loading Model (Vollen-  -
weider  1976; Vollenweider
1974)

BAY 5 (Richardson and
Bierman 1976)
SMILE 1  (Bierman and
Dolan 1976)
SMILE 51
HURO 1 (Brandstetter
et al. 1973)

Saginaw Bay Phytoplankton
and Nutrient Cycling
Model (Limno-Tech, Inc.
1978)

Saginaw Bay Total Phosphorus
Model (Canale and Squire
1976)
ERIE 01
Phytoplankton Motel of
Western Lake Erie
(O'Connor e£ al. 1975)
Ri chardson/Klabbers
Eutrophication Model
(Richardson and Klabbers
1974)
Mesolimnion Exchange
Model (Burns and Ross
1972)
NOAA's Ecological
Lake Ontario Model
Scavia ejt al_.  1976)
Tetra-Tech Water
Water Quality Eco-
logical Model (Chen
et al. 1975)
LAKE 1 (Thomann et
al 1975; Thomann et
aT 1976)
                            LAKE  1-A1

                            LAKE  3l

                            Lake  Reactor Model

                            Snodgrass/O'Melia
                            Phosphorus Model
                            (Snodgrass and
                            O'Melia 1975)
                                      12

-------
                              TABLE 1 (CONTINUED)
Lake Huron/Sag1naw Bay
      Lake Erie
Lake Ontario
                                                           Nutrient Accumula-
                                                           tion Rate Model
                                                           (Clark et al_. 1976)
Management Model for Saginaw
Bay (Limno-Tech, Inc. 1978)
AUTO-QUAL Estuary Model     LAKE 31
(Delos 1976)
FLUSH 021

BAY 16 (Richardson 1974;
Richardson 1976)
Lake Erie Chloride Balance  Rochester Embayment
Model (Rumer, et al. 1974)  Model (Limno-Tech,
                            1976)
^Model developed at U.S. EPA's Large Lakes Research Station, Grosse lie,
 Michigan.  No published information currently available.
                                      13

-------
 TABLE 2.  SUMMARY OF CIRCULATION/TRANSPORT MODELS RELEVANT TO THE  GREAT LAKES
Lake Superior
   Lake Michigan
Lake Superior Circulation Model
(Hoopes et al. 1973)
Lake Superior Transport Model
(Diehl 1977)
Lake Huron/Saginaw Bay
Estuary and Coastal Cir-
culation Model  (Lorenzen
e_t ^1_. 1974; Leendertse
et al. 1973)

Alternati ng-Di recti on-Im-
plicit Model (Allender
1976)

Katz-Kizlauskas Model
(Allender 1976)

Modified Simons Model
(Allender 1976)

Bennett Model (Allender
1976)

Green Bay Diffusion Model
(Ahrnsbrak and Ragotzkie
1970)

Three-Dimensional, Vari-
able Density, Rigid Lid
Hydrodynamic and Heat
Dispersion Model^

Green Bay Hydrodynamic
Model (Patterson et^ al.
1975)

Nearshore Water Pollu-
tant Fate Model for Lake
Michigan (Wnek and
Fochtman 1972)
   Lake Erie
  Lake Ontario
Alternati ng-Di recti on-Imp 1i •
cit Model  (Allender 1976)
                                  Lake Erie Wind-Driven
                                  Current Model
                                  (Lorenzen et al. 1974)
Partial Ice-Cover,
Wind-Driven Current
Model for Lake Erie
(Lick 1976)
Steady-State Circul-
ation Model for
Shallow Lakes (Lor-
enzen et^ al. 1974)

Three-Dimensional
Lake Ontario Wind-
Driven Current Model
(Lorenzen et al.
1974)        ~
                                       14

-------
                              TABLE 2  (CONTINUED)
Lake Huron/Saginaw Bay
           Lake Erie
Lake Ontario
Three-Dimensional, Variable
Density, Rigid Lid Hydrod
and Heat Dispersion Model
namic
                                  Steady-State, Near-
                                  shore, Wind-Driven
                                  Current Model (Lick
                                  1976)

                                  Time-Dependent, Near-
                                  shore, Wind-Driven
                                  Current Model (Haq
                                  and Lick  1975; Lick
                                  1976)
                                  Simons Free-Surface
                                  Lake Circulation Model
                                  (Lick 1976)

                                  Constant-Depth, Finite
                                  Element Circulation
                                  Model (Lorenzen ejt
                                  al_. 1974)

                                  Lake Erie Wind Tide
                                  Model (Lorenzen elt
                                  al. 1974; Platzman
                                  1963)

                                  Lam/Simons Chloride
                                  Transport Model (Lam
                                  and Simons 1976)

                                  Lam/Jaquet Transport
                                  and Phosphorus Regene-
                                  ration Model  (Lam and
                                  Jaquet 1976)
                                  Markov Process Circulation
                                  and Pollutant Distribution
                                  Model (Howell et ^1_. 1970)

                                  Great Lakes Diffusion Model
                                  (Boyce and Hamblin  1975)

                                  Lake Erie Hydraulic Model 1
                                 Lake Ontario Winter
                                 Circulation Model
                                 (Paskausky 1971)
                                 Bennett Model
                                 (Allender 1976)
                                 Lake Ontario Heat
                                 Transport Model
                                 (Simons 1975)
                                 Lake Ontario Hydrau-
                                 lic Model (Rumer et
                                 al. 1974)        ~~
                                 General Circulation
                                 Model for Lakes
                                 (Huang 1977)
    published information currently available.
                                        15

-------
        TABLE 3.  SUMMARY OF AVAILABLE HEAT  DISPERSION,  NONPOINT  SOURCE,
     TOXIC  SUBSTANCES AND MISCELLANEOUS MODELS RELEVANT  TO  THE  GREAT LAKES
 Heated-Effluent Dispersion Models
  Nonpoint  Source  Models
 Hoopes Heated Surface Jet-Steady Cross-
 current Model (Policastro and Tokar
 1972)

 Motz/Benedict Heated Jet-Flowing Ambient
 Stream Model (Policastro and Tokar 1972)
 Stolzenbach/Harleman Heated Surface Jet
 Model  (Policastro and Tokar 1972)
 Edinger-Polk Two-Dimensional Heated Ef-
 fluent Model (Policastro and Tokar 1972)
 Edinger-Polk Three-Dimensional Heated Ef-
 fluent Model (Policastro and Tokar 1972
Csanady Offshore Outfall Model (Policastro
and Tokar  1972)
Csanady Surface-Discharge Model (Policastro
and Tokar 1972)
Kolesar/Sonnichsen Thermal Energy Transport
Model (Policastro and Tokar 1972)
Wnek Heat Dispersion Model (Policastro and
Tokar 1972)

Pritchard Thermal Plume Model (Policastro
and Tokar 1972)
Sundaram Thermal Plume Model (Policastro
and Tokar 1972)
Remote Sensing Thermal Plume Model
(Cataldo et aj_. 1976)
Universal  Soil  Loss  Equation
(Forest  Service  1977;  Forest Ser-
vice  1977)

Storm Water Management Model
(Forest  Service  1977;  Forest Ser-
vice  1977)

Hydrocomp  Simulation Program
(Forest  Service  1977;  Forest Ser-
vice  1977)

Pesticide  Transport  and Runoff
Model (Donigian  and  Crawford
1976)

Unified  Transport Model (Forest
Service  1977; Forest Service
1977)

BaHelle Urban Wastewater Manage-
ment Model (Branstetter et  al
1973)

Wisconsin  Hydrologic Transport
Model (Forest Service  1977;
Forest Service 1977)

Storage, Treatment and Overflow
Model (U.S. Army Corps of En-
gineers  1975)

Agricultural Chemical  Transport
Model (Frereet  al_.  1975)

Nonpoint Source  Pollutant Loading
Model (Donigian  and  Crawford
1976)

Agricultural Runoff  Management
Model (Donigian  and  Davis 1978;
Donigian and Crawford  1976)

Water-Sediment-Chemical Effluent
Prediction Model (Bruce 1973)
                                        16

-------
                              TABLE 3  (CONTINUED)
Heated-Effluent Dispersion Models
  Nonpoint Source Models
Wu/Gallagher Thermal Plume Model  (Wu  and
Gallagher 1973)

Longshore Thermal Plume Model  (Palmer
1969)
LANDRUN (Konrad et al. 1978)
Hydrological Land-Use Model
(Bedlent et al_. 1977)

Stormwater Overflow Pollution
Stream Model (Smith and Eilers
1978)

Stormwater Overflow Hydraulic
Stream Model (Smith and Eilers
1978)
Toxic Substances Mooels
  Miscellaneous Models
PCB Model for the Great Lakes  (Whitmore
1977)

Great Lakes Radionuclide Model  (Sullivan
and Ellett 1976)

Strontium 90 Concentration/Time Model
(Lerman  1972)
Cadmium Food Chain Model for Lake  Erie
(Thomann 1974)
Aquatic Food Chain Model for Lake Ontario
(Thomann 1978)

Mercury Model  (Miller  1978)
Vinyl Chloride Model  (Miller  1978)
Environmental Exposure Model  (Miller  1978)
Pesticide Transport and Runoff Model
(Miller 1978)
                                        17
Water and Related Land Resources
System Model (Haimes et al_. 1973)

Phosphorus Mass Flow Program
(Porcella and Bishop 1975)

Water Resource Allocation and
Pricing Optimization Model
(Narayanan e^t a1_. 1977)

Spatial Pollution Analysis and
Comparative Evaluation Model -
SPACE (Heilberg 1976)

Lake Erie Integrated Policy Model
(Mesarovic 1973)

Hydrologic Models of the Great
Lakes (Meredith 1975)

PLUARG Overview Model  (Johnson
et a].. 1978)

Lake Erie Phosphorus Discharge
Simulation Model (Prober and
Melnyk 1974)

REMOVE (Drynan 1978)
                                               CLEANER  (Park  et  aj_.  1975)

-------
                              TABLE  3  (CONTINUED)

Toxic Substances  Models              ~~       Miscellaneous ModelT
                                              Imboden  Phosphorus Model  (Imboden
                                              1974)

                                              Modified  Imboden  Phosphorus Model
                                              (Imboden  and Gachter  1978)

                                              Oglesby/Schaffner Phosphorus
                                              Model  (Oglesby  1977;  Oglesby  and
                                              Schaffner 1978)

                                              Dillon/Rigler Nutrient Loading
                                              Model  (Dillon and Rigler  1974)

                                              Lorenzen Phosphorus Model (Loren-
                                              zen et al. 1976)
                                      13

-------
Lake Huron's Saginaw Bay, Lake Michigan's Green  Bay,  etc.   The  water  quality
variables most frequently simulated  include phytoplankton,  zooplankton,
nutrient concentrations  and dissolved oxygen  concentrations.  Several  of
these models have been used to evaluate the long-term response  of  receiving
waters to hypothetical management  scenarios.   For  example,  eutrophication
models have been applied to western  Lake Erie  for  estimating  reductions in
nutrient concentrations  and phytoplankton levels which may  be expected from
several alternative control strategies, including  (1)  80 percent removal of
all incoming phosphorus, (2)  a detergent phosphate ban, and  (3) a  50  percent
decrease in the phosphorus load from agricultural  runoff.

Circulation/Transport Models

    Table 2 shows that several circulation models  have been  used to examine
water movements in Lakes Michigan, Erie and Ontario.   On the  other hand,
very little attention has been devoted to Lake Superior or  Lake Huron.  In
the past, the majority of circulation models  were  limited to  the study of
average, two-dimensional (horizontal), central-lake current  patterns  for
fixed wind directions and magnitude.  However, the state-of-the-art in this
area has advanced now to incorporate vertical  variations in water movement,
as well as time-dependent circulation in both  the  central lake  and nearshore
zones.

    Hydrodynamic models  have  been  used to identify dominant  characteristics
of lake water movement,  and are often used in  conjunction with water  quality
models to define the rates of water  exchange  among various  segments of the
lake system.  They can also be applied to assess the  effects  of man-made
structures on existing water  movements in the  nearshore zones of large
lakes.  This was exemplified  in a  study of expected modifications  to  coastal
currents in the Cleveland area of  Lake Erie as a result of  constructing a
jetport island approximately  six miles offshore.

Heated Effluent Dispersion Models

    Heat dispersion models are used  to predict temperature  distributions in
waters receiving heated  effluent discharges.   They are designed for simu-
lating conditions in the near field  (the lake  region  at or  near the point of
discharge) and/or far field (the larger lake  region where temperature  ef-
fects of the thermal plume are still evident).   Heat  dispersion models have
been developed to accomodate  either  surface or submerged discharges,  and can
be used to evaluate vertical  as well as horizontal  temperature  distribu-
tions.

    In reviewing several numerical models of  heat  dispersion  in lakes  (as
listed in Table 3 and described in detail in  Heidtke  1979),  it  was found
that the state-of-the-art has progressed steadily  over the  past few years.
Models have been developed which are capable  of  providing reasonable  esti-
mates of temperature fields in waters receiving  heated effluents from
steam-electric generation.  Although no single model  or technique  is  avail-
able for providing a comprehensive description of  both near  and far field
temperature distributions, combinations of methods (e.g., physical models
and field tests in conjunction with  mathematical models) can  be used  to

                                     19

-------
 generate  reliable  predictions  under  most  conditions.   A very informative
 discussion  of  this  area  can  be found in  a review of hydrothermal predictive
 techniques  conducted  by  Jirka  et_ aj_. (1976).

 Nonpoint  Source  Models

     Several  models  of land runoff quality and  quantity have been developed
 and  used  to  assess  nonpoint  source pollution  loadings  from rural and urban
 land.   Their application  to  the  Great  Lakes  has  increased as recent studies,
 such as the  U.S. and  Canadian  joint  study on pollution to the Great Lakes
 from land drainage, have  focused  on  the  significance  of nonpoint source
 pollution in the Great Lakes basin (Pollution  From Land Use Activities
 Reference Group, 1978).

     In generating  output, mathematical models  of land  runoff rely upon de-
 tailed information  concerning  the physical and chemical  characteristics of a
 given  watershed.   Input  data generally includes  predominant land use and
 soil types,  topography,  rainfall, snowmelt,  temperature and land management
 practices.   These models  can be  used to predict  runoff quantity and quality
 at  very short  time  intervals (every  15 minutes)  or over relatively long
 period (average  annual conditions).  Several nonpoint  source models incor-
 porate a  widely  used  relationship for estimating expected soil  losses  in
 the  region of  interest (Wischmeier and Smith).

 Models of Toxic  Chemicals

     As might be  expected, very few models  are  presently available for  in-
 vestigating  the fate  of low-level  toxic chemicals  in the  aquatic environ-
 ment.   Of the  small number of  models which are available,  only  a few have
 been applied to  study the effects  of these contaminants  in the  Great Lakes
 basin  (Table 3).  One of the primary reasons for this  is  a lack of quantita-
 tive information on toxic chemical inputs  to the lakes.   A lack of empirical
 data for  model calibration and verification further compounds the problem.
 There  is  an  obvious need for increased research  in  developing modeling
 techniques and data acquisition systems to assist  in broadening our under-
 standing  of  the effects of toxic  inputs to the Great Lakes.

 Other  Models

     In  view  of the frequent need  to  consider Great  Lakes  problems other than
 those  covered in the  previous  five categories, miscellaneous  mathematical
 models  potentially applicable  to  analysis  of other  factors (e.g., socio-
 economic  considerations,  waste loadings,  phosphorus removal  efficiencies,
 etc.) were also reviewed.  These models can be integrated  with  or used in
 parallel with more traditional  models to yield a more  comprehensive informa-
 tion base for decision-making.   Because the general review revealed numerous
models which fit this  description, only models which have  been  previously
 used within  the context of the lakes  were  considered in detail.-   These are
 listed in  Table 3.   A more complete  description  of  each model is  contained
 in Heidtke (1979).
                                      20

-------
    The major emphasis  in modeling the  economic  aspects  of  pollution  control
in the Great Lakes basin is  in the area of  "optimization".   Optimization  in-
volves identifying an optimum policy  under  a  given  objective function  (to
maximize benefits or minimize costs)  and set  of  constraints  (e.g.,  an  upper
limit on costs, or a specification on the manner  in which costs/benefits  are
distributed within a region).

    Johnson ejt aj_. (1978) employed a  general  model  of  pollutant  loadings
(total phosphorus and suspended  solids) to  the Great Lakes  to  identify cost-
effective strategies for achieving reduced  phosphorus.loads  to the  lakes.
Drynan (1978) used a model of phosphorus removal  processes  in municipal sew-
age treatment plants to generate  the  costs  of achieving  specified effluent
concentrations of total phosphorus.   Each of  these models can be used  to
complement other water  quality models in order to obtain a  better perspec-
tive for evaluating the desirability  of alternative pollution control
strategies.
MAJOR MODEL LIMITATIONS

    Perhaps the most  notable  difficulty  in  attempting to model  large bodies
of water such as the  Great Lakes  is the  problem of model verification.  The
relatively long response time of  the  lakes  makes  it difficult to test the
ability of many models to accurately  predict the  long-term  lake effects at-
tributable to changes  in different input variables (for example, reductions
in existing pollutant  loadings).  An  extensive historical data  base is also
necessary for quantifying the uncertainty associated with model projections.
Consequently, a lack  of appropriate verification  data often  limits the ac-
ceptance of model predictions by  water resources  planners and managers.

    Tables 1 and 2 indicate that  only a  few water quality and circulation/
transport models have  been used to evaluate nearshore lake  conditions.  As
is the case for many  large lakes, water  quality conditions  in the nearshore
zone of the Great Lakes is most critical from a human-use perspective.  For
this reason, predictive models are extremely valuable in helping to identify
effective ways of managing this area.  It is likely that the increased level
of spatial and temporal refinement necessary for  evaluating  nearshore condi-
tions can be readily  accomodated  using existing modeling techniques, al-
though more extensive  field data  must be available for "fine-tuning" the
models to localized lake conditions (shoreline features, bottom topography,
nearshore currents, pollutant loads from local tributaries,  etc.).  Cer-
tainly there exist limitations as to  the practicality of applying models for
predicting water quality changes  in nearshore areas.  As finer  and finer
scales of time and space are  introduced  in  the model application, the com-
puter costs for simulating water  quality profiles over a fixed  period often
increase significantly.  Additionally, there are  constraints on detail which
are imposed by the numerical  techniques  often used in solving the quantita-
tive expressions common to many of these models (this is particularly true
for circulation/transport models  shown in Table 2).  Therefore, although
water quality models  have not been extensively applied for  evaluating near-
shore conditions, it appears  that the technology  is available if used within
practical limits.
                                     21

-------
    Although several heat dispersion models  have  been  developed  (Table 3),
very few have as yet been applied to analyze thermal discharges  to  the Great
Lakes.  This is partially attributable to  a  lack  of field  data for  calibra-
tion and verification.  In order to better understand  the  limitations  and
appropriate uses of heat dispersion models, more  extensive testing  of  model
predictions against field measurements is  required.

    As noted in Table 3, several models are  currently  available  to  examine
nonpoint source pollution in the Great Lakes basin.  One of the  more  recent
applications of a nonpoint source model within the context of the Great
Lakes was carried out by Konrad et aj_. (1978).  In this case, the model
LANDRUN was used to estimate unit area loads of various contaminants  from
several areas of the Menomonee River basin located in  the  State  of  Wisconsin
(tributary to Lake Michigan).  However, because many models of land runoff
often require a rather detailed data base  on the  aforementioned  input  vari-
ables, their application for assessing nonpoint source pollution from  a
large region such as the Great Lakes basin is limited.  Several  of  the non-
point source models listed in Table 3 are  better  suited for predicting run-
off quality and quantity in small watersheds having well-documented physi-
cal and chemical characteristics.
 PRACTICAL APPLICATION OF GREAT LAKES MODELS

    While the many models developed to date have been extremely  instructive
 from  a  large  lakes research point of view, the true mark of  achievement  has
 been  in the application of models in real planning situations.   Back  in  the
 late  1960's, the Great Lakes Basin Commission, a U.S. planning organization
 with  responsibility for the U.S. portion of the Great Lakes,  began  to  view
 each  of the Great Lakes and their basins as an integrated  system.

    It was apparent to the Great Lakes Basin Commission at that  time  that
 conventional planning techniques would not be sufficient for  holistic  evalu-
 ations of the Great Lakes.  Consequently, after consulting extensively with
 scientific experts and other knowledgeable people from both  the  United
 States and Canada, the Basin Commission sponsored a feasibility  study  to de-
 monstrate the application of system models to existing or  hypothetical
 situations within the Great Lakes.

    This feasibility study resulted in the comprehensive report  entitled,  "A
 Limnological Systems Analysis of the Great Lakes, Phase I" (Hydroscience
 1973).  This report documented the practicality and desirability of uti-
 lizing models in planning for the Great Lakes region, and made recommenda-
 tions for specific modeling approaches which could be used in the near
 future.

    This early pioneering effort stimulated additional modeling  activities,
 further advancing the possibility of planning for the Great  Lakes an  an  en-
 tire  system.  Some of the models proposed in Hydroscience  (1973),  such as  a
 lakewide eutrophication model of Lake Erie and Lake Ontario,  have already
 been  developed and applied to some extent (Tables 1 and 2).   These  and other
models have been used in several significant policy and resource management

                                     22

-------
decisions, e.g., the  Lake  Erie  Wastewater  Management  Study (U.S.  Army Corps
of Engineers  1976)  and the National  Commission  of  Water  Quality Regional
Assessment Study (Rolan  1975).

    One of the  best examples  of how  mathematical models  can  be  used  in water
resources decision-making  was the formulation of desirable phosphorus loads
or inputs to  the Great Lakes.   Given  different  alternative conditions of
lake quality, a number of  available  models  were used  to  determine the ap-
proximate total phosphorus loads necessary to achieve those  conditions.
Without the modeling  work  that  has been  conducted  over the last several
years, it would have  been  virtually  impossible  to  determine  the extent to
which current loads must be reduced  to  achieve  the desired trophic condi-
tions.

    One of the  principal features of this  particular  application  of  models
was that several independently  developed models (at least  three models were
used in the analysis  of  a  lake  basin) were  used to relate  desired condi-
tions to target loads.   Results and  projections of each  model were then com-
pared.  The fact that different models,  which varied  in  their complexity and
spatial and temporal  scale, predicted similar results provided  an additional
measure of confidence in the  results.   A detailed  discussion of the  models
used, as well as the  method by  which  the loads  were determined,  can  be found
in Bierman (1979)  and Thomas  ejb ^1_.  (1979).


FUTURE GREAT  LAKES  MODELING - WATER  QUALITY, CIRCULATION/TRANSPORT AND NON-
POINT SOURCES

    To complement  the recently  completed review of past  Great Lakes  modeling
capabilities, a separate study  (Heidtke  and Sonzogni  1979) was  undertaken to
provide some  insight  into  ongoing or  soon-to-begin modeling  activities which
have applicability  or potential  applicability to the  Great Lakes.  Informa-
tion was obtained  through  a survey of several U.S.  and Canadian agencies and
academic institutions involved  in modeling  aquatic ecosystems.

    According to the  survey,  continued  emphasis will  be  placed  on modeling
the eutrophication  process.  Much of  this  work  will be an  extension  and re-
finement of previous  efforts  to calibrate,  verify  and apply mathematical
models to eutrophication problems in  the Great  Lakes,  particularly the near-
shore area of the  lakes.   Included in this  work will  be  (a)  refined  spatial
and temporal  detail,  (b) distinction  among  various species of phytoplankton
and zooplankton present, (c)  distinction among  various forms of nutrients
and their potential for  influencing  algal  growth,  and (d)  consideration of
the statistical reliability of  model  predictions.   Additionally,  water
quality models which  have  been  previously  verified in Great  Lakes applica-
tions will be used more  extensively  as  aids in  the decision-making process,
i.e., in helping to identify  and evaluate  cost-effective strategies  for
managing the  lakes.

    Specific water  quality problems  and  issues  which  will  be addressed using
mathematical modeling techniques include:


                                     23

-------
     1.  Phytoplankton/zooplankton production  in  Lake  Ontario,  as
        well as alternatives for achieving  its control.

     2.  Statistical quantification of error bounds  on output from
        eutrophication models, including identification  of  the
        major sources of error.

     3.  Development of waste load allocations  for  conventional
        pollutants discharged to the Lower Fox River/Green  Bay
        system of Lake Michigan.

     4.  Evaluation of the  impact of changes in nutrient  loadings
        on the growth and  distribution of Cladophora  in  the
        Great Lakes.

     Continued emphasis will be placed on the  refinement  and application of
mathematical models for the study of Great Lakes  hydrodynamics.   It  is  anti-
cipated that previous developments in the state-of-the-art  will  facilitate
more practical applications and increased reliability in model predictions.
Although research will still be directed at improving the predictive capa-
bilities of circulation/transport models by revising  and updating input data
and/or various model assumptions, an increased effort will  be  made to take
advantage of existing technology for planning and management purposes.

     Specific developments  in modeling the dynamics  of water movements in the
Great Lakes will include:

     1.  Modification and application of previously  verified three-
        dimensional circulation models as tools for simulating
        pollutant transport in the lakes.

     2.  Critical comparison of circulation models through tests  of
        model predictions  against observed field  data.

     3.  Assessment of modeling techniques for simulating wave
        heights and directions in Lake Michigan,  Lake Superior and
        Lake Erie.

     4.  Design of methods  for computing winds and associated surface
        stress on the basis of weather observations and  output from
        large-scale weather prediction models.

     5.  Further integration of hydrodynamic models  to provide  more
        comprehensive evaluations of lake conditions.

     6.  Combined remote sensing and mathematical modeling for  the
        study of sediment  transport and thermal  structure in Lake
        Erie.

     It would appear that modeling of nonpoint source  pollution will  receive
major emphasis over the next few years.  Much of  this work  will  be devoted
to refinement and application of previously developed nonpoint source

                                     24

-------
models.  A few of the anticipated  activities
cussed below.
in this area are briefly dis-
    1.  Previous applications of nonpoint  source models  have  been
        limited to analysis of runoff quality  and quantity  from  rela-
        tively small watersheds, which represents a  serious constraint
        on their utility for generating basinwide estimates of non-
        point source pollutant inputs to the lakes;  therefore, an  at-
        tempt will be made to assess the predictive  capabilities of
        such models when applied to  larger watersheds  of varying
        physiographic characteristics.

    2.  In recognition of the need to consider  Great Lakes  water
        quality/quantity problems and their possible solutions from  a
        systems perspective, nonpoint source models  will  be linked
        with water quality models in an attempt to evaluate the  impact
        of various land management practices on downstream  receiving
        waters.

    3.  Similar to work being carried out  in the area  of water quality
        modeling, continued testing of certain  nonpoint  source models
        will be conducted in order to (1)  quantify the errors  in
        model predictions and (2) identify the  source  of those errors
        and how they may be modified to improve model  predictions.

    4.  One of the major obstacles to more widespread  use of models
        as planning and management tools is their failure to  ade-
        quately consider the social, economic  and administrative fac-
        tors involved in many decision problems; to  alleviate this
        shortcoming, research is ongoing which  should  provide valuable
        information in the aforementioned  areas.
FUTURE GREAT  LAKES MODELING - CHEMICAL TOXIC SUBSTANCES

    Until recently, toxic chemicals  have received  very little  attention  in
terms of attempts to quantify their  pathways through, and effects on,  the
aquatic environment.  However,  increased awareness  and concern  over  the  po-
tential health risks posed by these  materials  has  now stimulated numerous
research activities designed to  advance the state-of-the-art  in toxic  sub-
stances modeling  (Heidtke and Sonzogni 1979).

    Toxic substances modeling of the Great Lakes is  particularly important
since the Great Lakes appear to be especially  vulnerable to toxic contamina-
tion.  Factors which may contribute  to the sensitivity of the  Great  Lakes  to
toxics, as suggested at a recent workshop sponsored  by the Great Lakes Basin
Commission, include:

    1.  The Great Lakes are close to and often  downwind of major
        sources of pollution.
                                     25

-------
    2.  Substances entering the Great Lakes are often subject to com-
        paratively long retention times, resulting in high accumula-
        tion of even low level inputs.

    3.  Atmospheric inputs to the Great Lakes are large and are not
        "filtered" by soils.

    4.  The Great Lakes contain extensive oligotrophic areas with
        particularly sensitive biota.

    5.  Particulate material in the deep Great Lakes is deposited at
        a relatively slow rate, allowing more time for bioaccumula-
        tion of toxics.

    6.  The relatively unproductive nature of the lakes (except Lake
        Erie) may decrease the rate of removal of toxic substances
        from the water column, thus increasing the amount taken up
        by fish.

    7.  The low suspended sediment load per unit volume to each of the
        Great Lakes (except Lake Erie) may contribute to their sensi-
        tivity; higher volumetric sediment loads may provide more op-
        portunity for sorption of toxics and their subsequent settling
        out of the water column (higher solids loads may also serve to
        "dilute" toxic concentrations in bottom sediments).

    8.  The active circulation and mixing which are characteristic of
        the Great Lakes helps to rapidly distribute toxics throughout
        the lakes.

These factors, which are also likely to be relevant to many other large
lakes of the world, need to be given special consideration in the develop-
ment of toxic substances models.

    Included among the several toxic substances modeling studies which will
be directed at the Great Lakes in the future are:

    1.  A model of the accumulation of PCBs in Lake Michigan sediments,
        as well as their subsequent uptake by pelagic fishes.

    2.  Development of a model to predict fluxes of toxic chemicals
        to and from sediments in Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron.

    3.  Continuation of efforts to formulate a modeling framework for
        the fate ,and effects of hazardous substances in the aquatic
        food chains of the Great Lakes.

    At present it is difficult to assess how successful each of these model-
ing efforts will, be in terms of increasing our understanding of the interac-
tions and effects of toxic materials on the Great Lakes ecosystem.  However,
these activities likely represent only the beginning in terms of toxics
modeling developments within the next few years.  As more becomes known

                                      26

-------
about the behavior of  toxic materials  in  the  environment,  priorities  for re-
search may be expected to  shift.   For  example,  various  studies  will be  using
models which have been previously  applied  in  the  analysis  of  other water
quality/quantity phenomena (eutrophication, nonpoint  source runoff, etc.).
This work may reveal that  the modeling technology already  exists  for  evalu-
ating the effects of toxic inputs  to the  Great  Lakes.   On  the other hand,  it
may be necessary to pursue new  and unique  modeling avenues in order to  ef-
fectively characterize the problem and answer critical  management questions.
In either case, modeling research  is progressing  in this area and should
continue to do  so over the next few years.

    As a final  note, perhaps one of the most  critical needs for advancing
the state-of-the-art in toxics modeling is a  carefully  designed field
sampling program.  This program must be coordinated with the  spatial  and
temporal detail required for reliable  model calibration/verification.   The
resulting historical data  base  should  be  regulary updated, easily acces-
sible, and maintained  in a format  which promotes  its  effective  use for
evaluating models of toxic substances.


SUMMARY

    During the  past 15 years, over 100 mathematical models have been  deve-
loped to assist in increasing our  understanding of the  Great  Lakes system.
Many of these models have  been  successful  in  terms of the  information they
have provided for making management and planning  decisions, as  well as  the
insight they have provided for future  research.   Water  quality  models have
probably been given the most attention, with  the  majority  designed to in-
vestigate conditions in the lower  Great Lakes —  Erie and  Ontario.  However,
recent modeling developments have  more frequently looked at the Great Lakes
as an integrated system, an approach that  is  fundamental for  comprehensive
resource management.

    Perhaps the greatest constraint on the use  of Great Lakes models  is  the
inherent difficulty associated with model  verification.  This difficulty is
due, at least in part, to  the large size  of the Great Lakes and their rela-
tively long water and  chemical residence  times.   However,  a measure of  con-
fidence in model predictions has been  achieved  when different models, vary-
ing in complexity and  temporal  and spatial scale,  have  generated  similar re-
sults.

    Future Great Lakes modeling efforts should  be directed toward toxic
chemicals.  Contamination  by toxic chemicals  is currently  the most pressing
problem affecting the  Great Lakes.  Modeling  efforts  should also  concentrate
on the nearshore area, which is the most  critical  sector from a human use
perspective.

    As a final comment, it should  not  be  assumed  that increased model com-
plexity is always a prerequisite for improving  their  utility  as decision-
making tools.   In the  future it may be more effective,  at  least in terms of
long-range planning objectives, to place  greater  emphasis  on  models which
can be practically used to arrive  at management decisions  rather  than on

                                     27

-------
models which incorporate maximum detail for all system parameters and vari-
ables.  Similarly, if models are forced to meet extremely rigid calibration/
verification tests as the criteria for judging their acceptability, much of
their potential may go unrealized.  This notwithstanding, the role of models
in managing the lakes is now becoming better defined and their limitations
more clearly understood.  Hopefully, this will generate added confidence in
mathematical models as a necessary and valuable asset in developing effec-
tive management plans for the Great Lakes and other large lakes throughout
the world.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    This paper is a contribution of the Great Lakes Environmental Planning
Study.  The assistance of Ms. Ann Davis in preparing the manuscript is
gratefully acknowledged.


REFERENCES

Ahrnsbrak, W.F. and R.A. Ragotzkie.  1970.  Mixing processes in Green Bay.
    Marine Studies Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.  Sea
    Grant Prog. Reprint WIS-SG-71-312.

Allender, J.H.  1976.  Water Resources  Research Program:  Review and ap-
    praisal of numerical circulation models for Lake Michigan.  Argonne
    National Laboratory, Great Lakes Project, Argonne, Illinois.  Prepared
    for U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration.

Bedient, P.B., W.C. Huber and J.P. Heaney.  1977.  Environmental model of
    Kissimmee River Basin.  J. Water Res. Plan. Mgt., ASCE, 103, WR2, pp.
    241-256.

Bierman, V.J. and D.M. Dolan.  1976.  Mathematical modeling of phytoplankton
    dynamics in Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron.  Dn Proceedings of the Conference
    on Environmental Modeling and Simulation, U.S. Environmental Protection
    Agency, EPA Report No. EPA-600/9-76-016, pp. 773-779.

Bierman, V.J., Jr.  1979.  A comparison of models developed for phosphorus
    management in the Great Lakes.  Prepared for Conference on Phosphorus
    Management Strategies for the Great Lakes, Rochester, New York.

Boyce, P.M. and P.P. Hamblin.  1975.  A simple diffusion model of the mean
    field distribution of soluble materials in the Great Lakes.  Limnol.
    Oceanogr., 20(4), pp. 511-517.

Brandstetter, A., R.L. Engel and D.B. Cearlock.  1973.  A mathematical model
    for optimum design and control of metropolitan wastewater management
    systems.  Water Resour. Bull, 9(6), pp. 1188-1200.
                                    28

-------
Bruce, R.R.  1973.  Water-sediment-chemical effluent prediction (WA-S-CH
    Model).  Southern Peidmont Conservation Research Center, Agricultural
    Research Service, Department of Agriculture, Watkinsville, Georgia.

Burns, N.M. and C. Ross.  1972.  Project Hypo -- An intensive study of the
    Lake Erie central basin hypolimnion and related surface water phenomena.
    Canada Centre for Inland Waters, Paper No. 6, U.S. Environmental Protec-
    tion Agency, Technical Report, TS-05-71-208-24.

Canale, R.P., S. Nachiappan, D.J. Hineman and H.E. Allen.  1973.  A dynamic
    model for phytoplankton production in Grand Traverse Bay.  Proc. 16th
    Conf. on Great Lakes Res., Internat. Assoc. for Great Lakes Res., pp.
    21-33.

Canale, R.P., R.L. Patterson, J.J. Gannon and W.F. Powers.  1973.   Water
    quality models for total coliform.  J. Water Pol. Control. Fed., 45(2),
    pp. 325-335.

Canale, R.P. and J. Squire.  1976.  A model for total phosphorus in Saginaw
    Bay.  J. Great Lakes Res., Internat. Assoc. Great Lakes Res.,  2(2), pp.
    364-373.

Canale, R.P., L.M. DePalma and A.M. Vogel.  1976.  A plankton-based food web
    model for Lake Michigan.  Ir± Modeling Biochemical Processes in Aquatic
    Ecosystems.  R.P. Canale (Ed.), Ann Arbor Science Pub!., Inc., Ann
    Arbor, Michigan, pp. 33-73.

Cataldo, J.C., R.R. Zavesky and A.S. Goodman.  1976.  Correlation of mathe-
    matical models for water temperature with aerial infrared water tempera-
    ture surveys.  Polytechnic Institute of New York.  Brooklyn, New York,
    State Energy Research and Development Authority.

Chapra, S.C.  1977.  Total phosphorus model for the Great Lakes, Env. Engr.
    Div., ASCE, 103, EE2, pp. 147-161.

Chen, C.W., M. Lorenzen and D.J. Smith.  1975.  A comprehensive water
    quality-ecological model for Lake Ontario.  Prepared for Great Lakes
    Environmental Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Ad-
    ministration, by Tetra Tech., Inc.

Clark, P.A.A., J.P. Sandwick, D.J. Casey and A. Solpietro.  1976.   An em-
    pirical model for nutrient accumulation rates in Lake Ontario.  Jji Pro-
    ceedings of the Conference on Environmental Modeling and Simulation,
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Report No. EPA-600/9-76-016,
    pp. 176-181.

Delos, C.G.  1976.  Mathematical model of a Great Lakes estuary.  Jj^ Pro-
    ceedings of the Conference on Environmental Modeling and Simulation,
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,.EPA Report No. EPA-600/9-76-016,
    pp. 115-119.
                                     29

-------
Diehl, S., W. Maanum and T. Jordon.  1977.  Transport in Lake Superior.  J.
    Geophy. Res., 82(6), pp. 977-978.

Dillon, D.J. and F.H. Rigler.  1974.  A test of a simple nutrient budget
    model predicting the phosphorus concentration in lake water.  J. Fish.
    Res. Board Can., 31, pp. 1771-1778.

Donigian, A.S., Jr. and N.H. Crawford.   1976.  Modeling pesticides and
    nutrients on agricultural lands.  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
    EPA Report No.  EPA-600/2-76-043.

Donigian, A.S., Jr. and N.H. Crawford.   1976.  Modeling nonpoint pollution
    from the land surface.  U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Re-
    port No. EPA-600/3-76-083.

Donigian, A.S., Jr. and H.H. Davis, Jr.  1978.  User's manual for agricul-
    tural runoff management (ARM) model.   U.S. Environmental Protection
    Agency, EPA Report No. EPA-600/3-78-080.

Drynan, W.R.  1978.  Relative costs of  achieving various levels of phos-
    phorus control  of municipal  wastewater treatment plants in the Great
    Lakes basin.  Technical Report to the International  Reference Group on
    Great Lakes Pollution from Land Use Activities, International Joint
    Commission, Windsor, Ontario.

Fee, F.J.  1973.  A numerical model for determining integral primary produc-
    tion and its application to Lake Michigan.  J. Fish. Res. Board Can.,
    30, pp. 1447-1468.

Forest Service, U.S. Department  of Agriculture.  1977.  Nonpoint water
    quality modeling in wildland  management, a state-of-the-art assessment
    (Volume I - Text), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Report No.
    EPA-600/3-77-036.

Forest Service, U.S. Department  of Agriculture.  1977.  Nonpoint water
    quality modeling in wildland  management, a state-of-the-art assessment
    (Volume II - Appendixes).  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Re-
    port No. EPA-600/3-77-078.

Frere, M.H., C.A. Onstad and H.N. Holtan.  1975.  ACTMO - An agricultural
    chemical transport model.  Agricultural Research Service, Department of
    Agriculture, Hyattsville, Maryland, Report No. ARS-H-3.

Haimes, Y.Y., P. Das, K. Sung and K.S.  Lee.  1973.  Modeling and management
    of water and related land resources for phosphorus control and ecoli-
    brium.  Dept. of Systems Engineering, Case Western Reserve University,
    Cleveland, Ohio.

Haq, A. and W. Lick.  On the time-dependent flow in a lake.  J. Geophy.
    Res.  80(3), pp. 431-437.
                                     30

-------
Heidtke, T.M.  1979.  Modeling the Great Lakes system:  Update of existing
    models.  Great Lakes Environmental Planning Study Report, Great Lakes
    Basin Commission, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 79 p.

Heidtke, T.M. and W.C. Sonzogni.  1979.  Modelino the Great Lakes system:
    Ongoing and planned modeling activities.  Great Lakes Environmental
    Planning Study Report, Great Lakes Basin Commission, Ann Arbor, Michi-
    gan.

Heilberg, E.  1976.  SPACE:  A closer look at the impact of environmental
    policy.  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Report No. EPA-600/
    9-76-016.

Hoopes, J.A., R.A. Ragotzkie, S.L. Lien and N.P. Smith.  1973.  Circulation
    patterns in Lake Superior.  Wisconsin Water Resources Center, Madison,
    Wisconsin.

Howell, J.A., K.M. Kiser and R.R. Rumer, Jr.  1970.  Circulation patterns
    and a predictive model for pollutant distribution in Lake Erie.  Proc.
    18th Conf. on Great Lakes Res., Part 1, Internat. Assoc. Great Lakes
    Res., pp. 434-443.

Huang, J.C.K.  1977.  A general circulation model for lakes.  Great Lakes
    Environmental Research Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
    Administration, Technical Memorandum ERL GLERL-16.

Hydroscience, Inc.  1973.  Limnological systems analysis of the Great Lakes,
    Phase I.  Prepared for the Great Lakes Basin Commission, Ann Arbor,
    Michigan, 474 p.

Imboden, D.M.  1974.  Phosphorus model of lake eutrophication.  Limnol.
    Oceanogr., 19(2), pp. 297-304.

Imboden, D.M. and R. Gachter.  1978.  A dynamic lake model for trophic state
    prediction.  J. Ecol. Modelling, 4, pp. 77-98.

Jirka, G.H., G. Abraham and D.R.F. Harleman.  1976.  An assessment of tech-
    niques for hydrothermal prediction.  Prepared for U.S. Nuclear Regula-
    tory Commission, Report No. NUREG-0044.

Johnson, M.G., J.C. Comeau, T.M. Heidtke, W.C. Sonzogni.  1978.  Management
    information base and overview modelling.  Technical Report to the Inter-
    national Reference Group on Pollution from Land Use Activities, Inter-
    national Joint Commission, Windsor, Ontario.

Konrad, J.G. G. Chesters and K.W. Bauer.  1978.  Summary pilot watershed re-
    port:  Menomonee River Basin, Wisconsin.  Technical Report to the Inter-
    national Reference Group on Pollution from Land Use Activities, Inter-
    national Joint Commission, Windsor, Ontario.
                                     31

-------
Lam, D.C.L. and J.M. Jaquet.  1976.  Computations of physical transport  and
    regeneration of phosphorus in Lake Erie, Fall 1970.  J. Fish. Res. Board
    Canada, ,33(3), pp. 550-563.

Lam, D.C.L. and T.J. Simons.  1976.  Numerical computations of  advective  and
    diffusive transports of chloride in Lake Erie, 1970.  J. Fish. Res.
    Board Canada, 33(3), pp. 537-549.

Leendertse, J.J., R.C. Alexander and S.K. Liu.  1973.  A three-dimensional
    model for estuaries and coastal seas:  Volume I:  Principals of computa-
    tions.  Rand Corporation, Report No. R-1417-OWRR.
Lerman, A.  1972.  Strontium-90 in the Great Lakes:
    model.  J. Geophy. Res., 77(18), pp. 3256-3264.
                              Concentration-time
Lick, W.  1976.  Numerical models of lake currents.  U.S. Environmental Pro-
    tection Agency, EPA Report No. EPA-600/3-76-020.

Limno-Tech, Inc.  1976.  Genesee River and Rochester embayment quality
    models and evaluations.  Prepared for O'Brien and Gere Engineers,
    Syracuse, New York.

Limno-Tech, Inc.  1978.  Projections of critical water quality conditions  in
    Saginaw River and Bay.  Prepared for East Central Michigan Planning and
    Development Regional Commission, Saginaw, Michigan.

Lorenzen, M.W., C.W. Chen, E.K. Noda and L.S. Hwang.  1974.  Final report  -
    Lake Erie wastewater management study.  Prepared for U.S. Army Corps of
    Engineers, Buffalo District, by Tetra Tech, Inc., Tetra Tech Report No.
    TC-413.

Lorenzen, M.W., D.J. Smith and L.V. Kimmel.  1976.  A long-term phosphorus
    model for lakes:  Application to Lake Washington.  JJT^ Modeling Biochemi-
    cal Processes in Aquatic Ecosystems, R.P. Canale (Ed.), Ann Arbor
    Science Publishers, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Maier, W.J. and W.R. Swain.  1978.  Lake Superior organic carbon budget.
    Water Research, 12(6), pp. 403-412.
Meredith, D.D.  1975.
    Res. Bull., 11(3),
Predictive models for Great Lakes hydrology.
pp.  526-535.
Water
Mesarovic, M. (Ed.).  1973.  Multilevel systems model for interactive mode
    policy analysis in pollution control - 1: Interim report.  Complex
    Systems Institute and Systems Research Center, Case Institute of Tech-
    nology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

Miller, C.  1978.  Exposure assessment modeling:  A state-of-the-art review.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Report No. EPA-600/3-78-065.
                                     32

-------
Narayanan, R., B.C. Jensen and A.B. Bishop.  1977.  An optimization model
    for efficient management of urban water resources.  Water Res. Bull.,
    13(4), pp. 691-708.

O'Connor, D.J. and J.A. Mueller.  1970.  Water quality model of chlorides in
    Great Lakes.  J. San. Engr. Div., ASCE, 96, SA4, pp. 955-975.

O'Connor, D.J., D.M. DiToro and R.V. Thomann.  1975.  Phytoplankton models
    and eutrophication problems.  Jji Ecological Modeling in a Resource
    Management Framework, C.S. Russell (Ed.), Resources for the Future,
    Inc., Washington, D.C., pp. 149-209.

Oglesby, R.T.  1977.  Phytoplankton summer standing crop and annual produc-
    tivity as functions of phosphorus loading and various physical factors.
    J. Fish. Res. Board. Can., 34, pp. 2255-2270.

Oglesby, R.T. and W.R. Schaffner.  1978.  Phosphorus loadings to lakes and
    some of their responses.  Part 2.  Regression models of summer phyto-
    plankton stand crops, winter total P, and transparency of New York
    lakes with known phosphorus loadings, Limnol. Oceangr., 23(1), pp. 135-
    145.

Palmer, M.D.  1969.  Simulated thermal effluents into Lake Ontario.  Proc.
    12th Conf. on Great Lakes Res., Internat. Assoc. Great Lakes Res., pp.
    674-685.

Park, R.A., D. Scavia and N.L. Clesceri.  1975.  CLEANER:  The Lake George
    model.  In Ecological Modeling in a Resource Management Framework, C.S.
    Russell ITd.), Resources for the Future, Inc., Washington, D.C.,  pp. 49-
    81.

Paskausky, D.F.  1971.  Winter circulation in Lake Ontario.  Proc. Nth
    Conf. on Great Lakes Res., Internat. Assoc. Great Lakes Res., pp. 593-
    606.

Patterson, D.J., E. Epstein and J. McEvoy.  1975.  Water pollution investi-
    gation:  Lower Great Bay and lower Fox River.  U.S. Environmental Pro-
    tection Agency, EPA Report No. EPA-905/9-74-017.

Platzman, G.W.  1963.  The dynamic prediction of wind tides on Lake Erie.
    Meteorological Monographs, American Meteorological Society, 4(26), pp.
    1-44.

Policastro, A.O. and J.V. Tokar.  1972.  Heated-effluent dispersion in large
    lakes:  State-of-the-art analytical modeling.  Part 1.  Critique of
    modeling formulations.  Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois,
    Report No. ANL/ES-11.

Pollution from Land Use Activities Reference Group.  1978.  Environmental
    management strategy for the Great Lakes system.  Final Report to the
    International Joint Commission, Windsor, Ontario, Canada, 115 p.


                                     33

-------
Porcella, D.B. and A.B. Bishop.  1975.  Comprehensive management of phos-
    phorus water pollution, Ann Arbor, Science Publ., Inc., Ann Arbor,
    Michigan.

Prober, R. and D.B. Melnyk.  1974.   A simulation model for phosphorus water
    discharges in the Lake Erie basin.  Proc. 17th Conf. on Great Lakes Re-
    search, Part 1, Internat. Assoc. Great Lakes Res., pp. 514-519.

Richardson, J.M., Jr. and J.G. Klabbers.  1974.  A policy oriented model of
    the eutrophication problem in the Lake Erie ecosystem.  Systems Research
    Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, Report No. SRC
    74-1.

Richardson, W.L.  1974.  Modeling chloride distributions in Saginaw Bay.
    Proc. 17th Conf. on Great Lakes Res., Part 1, Internat. Assoc. Great
    Lakes Res., pp. 462-470.

Richardson, W.L.  1976.  An evaluation of the transport characteristics of
    Saginw Bay using a mathematical model of chloride.  In_ Modeling Bio-
    chemical Processes in Aquatic Ecosystems, R.P. Canale (Ed.), Ann Arbor
    Science Publishers, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Richardson, W.L. and V.J. Bierman,  Jr.  1976.  A mathematical model of
    pollutant cause and effect in Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron.  Water Quality
    Criteria Research of the U.S. EPA, U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency,
    EPA Report No. EPA-600/3-76-079, pp. 138-158.

Rolan, R.G.  1975.  Lake Erie regional assessment study.  Prepared for the
    U.S. National Commission on Water Quality.  Dalton, Dalton, Little, and
    Newport.  Cleveland, Ohio.

Rumer, R.R., Jr., K. Kiser and C.Y. Li.  1974.  Lake Ontario hydraulic model
    study (Preliminary results).  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Admini-
    stration Sea Grant 2-35281.

Rumer, R.R., Jr., D.D. Meredith and C.C. Chien.  1974.  Chloride build-up
    and control in Lake Erie.  Proc. 17th Conf. on Great Lakes Res., Part 1,
    Internat. Assoc. Great Lakes Res., pp. 520-5?4.

Scavia, D., B.J. Eadie and A. Robertson.  1976.  An ecological model for
    Lake Ontario:  Model formulation, calibration, and preliminary evalua-
    tion.  National Oceanic and Atmospheric  Administration Tech. Report No.
    ERL 371-6LERL 12.

Simons, T.J.  1975.  Verification of numerical models of Lake Ontario II:
    Stratified circulations and temperature  changes.  J. Phys. Oceanoqr.,
    5(1), pp. 98-110.

Smith, R. and R.G. Eilers.  1978.  Stream models for calculating pollutional
    effects of stormwater runoff.  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
    Report No. EPA-600/2-78-148.


                                     34

-------
Snodgrass, W.J. and C.R. O'Melia.  1975.  Predictive model for phosphorus in
    lakes.  Env. Sci.  Tech., 9(10), pp. 937-944.

Sonzogni, W.C., P.C. Uttormark and G.F. Lee.  1976.  A phosphorus residence
    time model:  Theory and application.  Water Research, 10(5), pp. 429-
    435.

Sullivan, R.E. and W.H. Ellett.  1976.  Radionuclide transport in the Great
    Lakes,  jjn Proceedings of the Conference on Environmental Modeling -and
    Simulation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Report No. EPA-
    600/9-76-016.

Tetra Tech, Inc.  1974.  Report to Lake Erie Wastewater Management Study on
    Water Quality Models.  Tetra Tech Report No. TC-413, Pasadena,
    California.

Thomann, R.V.  1974.  A food chain model of cadmium in western Lake Erie.
    Water Research, 8, pp. 841-849.

Thomann, R.V., D.M. DiToro, R.P. Winfield and D.J. O'Connor.  1975.  Mathe-
    matical modeling of phytoplankton in Lake Ontario.  Part 1.  Model
    development and verification.  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
    EPA Report No. EPA-660/3-75-005.

Thomann, R.V., R.P. Winfield, D.M. DiToro and D.J. O'Connor.  1976.  Mathe-
    matical modeling of phytoplankton in Lake Ontario.  Part 2.  Simulation
    using Lake 1 model.  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Report
    No. EPA-600/3-76-065.

Thomann, R.V.  1978.  Size dependent model of hazardous substances in
    aquatic food chains.  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Report
    No. EPA-600/3-78-036.

Thomas, N., A. Robertson and W. Sonzogni.  1979.  Review of control objec-
    tives, new target loads and input controls.  Preprint of paper to be
    included in:  Proceedings of the Conference on Phosphorus Management.
    Rochester, New York.  (Preprint available from Great Lakes Basin Commis-
    sion, Ann Arbor, Michigan).

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.  1975.  Lake Erie Wastewater Management Study
    preliminary feasibility report.  Buffalo District Army Corps of
    Engineers, Buffalo, New York.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.  1975.  Urban storm water runoff - STORM.  The
    Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, California, Computer Program 723-
    SB-L2520.

Vollenweider, R.A.  1968.  Scientific fundamentals of the eutrophication of
    lakes and flowing waters, with particular reference to nitrogen and
    phosphorus as factors in eutrophication.  Organ. Econ. Coop. Dev.,
    Paris, Technical Report No. DAS/CSI/68.27.


                                    35

-------
Vollenweider, R.A. and P.J. Dillon.  1974.  The application of the phos-
    phorus loading concept to eutrophication research.  NRC Report No.
    13690, Natural Resources Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.

Vollenweider, R.A.  1976.  Advances in defining critical loading levels for
    phosphorus in lake eutrophication.  Mem. 1st. Ital. Idrobio., 33, pp.
    53-83.

Whitmore, F.C.  1977.  A first order mass balance model for the sources,
    distribution and fate of PCB's in the environment.  U.S. Environmental
    Protection Agency, EPA Report No. EPA-460/6-77-006.

Wischmeier, W.H. and D.D. Smith.   1965.  Predicting rainfall - erosion
    losses for cropland east of the Rocky Mountains.  Agricultural Handbook
    282, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research.

Witten, A.J. and J.H. Thomas.  1976.  Steady wind-driven currents in a large
    lake with depth-dependent eddy viscosity.  J. Phys. Oceanogr., 6(1),
    pp. 85-92.

Wnek, W.J. and E.G.  Fochtman.  1975.  Mathematical models for the fate of
    pollutants in near-shore waters.  Env. Sci. Tech.  6(4), pp. 331-337.

Wu, D.S. and B.J. Gallagher.  1973.  Development of a complete mathematical
    model for describing the Point Beach Nuclear Power Plant thermal  plume.
    Proc. of the First World Congress on Water Resources (4 Vol.), Inter-
    national Water Resources Association, Champaign, Illinois, pp. 319-336.
                                    36

-------
                                 SECTION  3

                DATA MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR GREAT  LAKES
                           WATER QUALITY  MODELING

                          William L. Richardson 1
INTRODUCTION
    An important but often neglected  aspect  of water quality  research  and
management is data management.  The time has past when  individual  investi-
gators, biologists, chemists,  limnologists and geologists working  coopera-
tively with other investigators and agencies  on large, complex  and  inter-
acting systems such as the Great Lakes can record,  process, and  interpret
data without the benefit of digital computers and computerized data  bases.
Data are being produced by numerous agencies and scientists for  different
purposes and components of the eco-water system using analytical instruments
that produce analog and digital output at phenominal rates.   These data must
be recorded, transformed, verified, reduced, stored, retrieved,  and  statis-
tically analyzed, before they  become  useful.  This  paper discusses the data
management requirements for Great Lakes water quality research,  management
and mathematical modeling from a modeling perspective.


GREAT LAKES WATER QUALITY DATA

    The need for data is perceived in various ways  depending  on  one's  view-
point.  The planner requires information to  develop plans for future devel-
opment of remedial programs while the regulator requires an assessment of
which water quality standards  are being violated and the cause.  The public
health administrator wants to  know if the water is  safe for drinking and
swimming and whether the fish  are safe to eat.  The waste water  treatment
plant operator wants to know how much more effluent can be discharged  with-
out violating standards and the water supply manager wants to know the char-
acteristic of the water so the plant  can be  operated in the most efficient
manner.  The scientist (ecologist and limnologist)  desires an understanding
of how and why the system behaves and the modeler quantifies  hypotheses
describing this behavior.
'U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Large Lakes Research  Station,  Grosse
 He, Michigan 48138.
                                     37

-------
committee and will not be discussed  in detail  here.   However,  any water
quality data base must provide for notation  and  qualification  of the preces-
sion  and accuracy of the data.

     If data are to be transferred from one institution's  computer to
another, however, certain basic criteria must  be followed.   To facilitate
efficient and accurate exchange of data the  following guidelines should be
followed (International Joint Commission, in preparation):

     a.  That data be stored at a minimum resolution  of "raw data" i.e.,
        at the spacial and temporal  resolution at which an  individaul
        sample or observation was collected.

     b.  That data be specially referenced and  stored  according to either
        latitude-longtitude or Universal Transverse  Mercater - 6  UTM
        grid coordinate.

     c.  That measurements be directly or indirectly  referenced to a uni-
        form table of nomenclature for parameters in  accepted  units pre-
        ferably SI Units.

     d.  That individual data elements be stored  in reference to time
        and date.

     e.  That the time of data turn-around from the field  sample to
        storage be reduced to as short a time  as possible with a goal
        of less than 90 calendar days.

     f.  That an index or catalog of  data collected by participating
        agencies be maintained as an on-line computerized query system.

     g.  That the participants accept the responsibility for  comprehen-
        sive verification of all data stored in their respective systems.

     h.  That the agencies maintain their data  files  indefintely.

     i.  That agencies process data requests from investigators as quickly
        as possible.


DATA  NEEDS FOR MODELING

    The role of modeling in the water quality management  process  can be per-
ceived using Figure 1.  Mathematical  models provide  the focus  for the syn-
thesis of the surveillance data and  experimental research.   Model results
are used to translate data and tested theories into  terms managers can  use
for decision  making.  Decisions usually result which  either  alter the quan-
tities of residual materials allowed to enter  the system  or  which alter the
environmental  goals.  Data provide the basis for this  process  and the effi-
cient, accurate,  and timely management of these data  is mandatory.
                                      38

-------
DECISIONS
Treat
Plan
Enforce
Change goals
                   INPUT MONITORING
                   Waste loads
                   Tributary loads
                   Atmospheric loads
                   Meteorological conditions
LAKE SURVEILLANCE
Circulation
Morphology
Sediments
Biology
Chemistry
                                                 COMPARE
                           DATA
                                               VERIFICATION  )
                                               LABORATORY
                                               EXPERIMENTS
        Figure 1.  Great Lakes modeling-management process,
                             39

-------
    Therefore, data originate from surveys to determine the temporal and
spatial characteristics of physical, chemical, and biological properties for
a multitude of purposes.  For the Great Lakes, Canadian and U.S. Agencies
and laboratories are spending over $10 million per year on this effort, co-
ordinated through the International Great Lakes Surveillance Plan required
under the 1978 Water Quality Agreement (GLWQA 1978).

    The general objectives of this plan include (International Joint Commis-
sion 1978):

    1.  To search for, monitor, and quantify violations of the existing
        Agreement objectives (general and specific), the IJC recommended
        objectives, and jurisdictional standards criteria and objectives.

    2.  To monitor local and whole  lake response to abatement measures
        and to  identify emerging problems.

    3.  To provide data for determining the cause-effect relationship
        between water quality and material inputs in order to develop
        the appropriate remedial/preventative actions and predictions of
        the rate and extent of local/whole lake response to alternate
        abatement proposals.


BASIC  REQUIREMENTS

    The component of the International Great Lakes Surveillance Plan which
provides the  primary means of data  coordination is data management  and
interpretation.  A work group of the  International Joint Commission  (IJC)1
Surveillance  Subcommittee has been  established to develop a data management
plan and to provide general guidelines for data interpretation.  Some basic
requirements  of this plan include:

1.  Accuracy  and Timeliness:  Timeliness  is an essential factor in  water
quality research and management.  Delays  in processing results to the
manager can result  in  inaccurate, erroneous decision-making and ineffi-
ciencies.  However, accuracy should not be sacrificed for expediency.  Ac-
curacy must be  assurred through careful transcription, keying, and  verifi-
cation.  Accountability by the persons involved assures a higher degree of
accuracy.

2.  Compatibility:  Because Great Lakes data are collected by  a multitude  of
agencies and  laboratories by various  disciplines in two countries,  one  pro-
vince  and  eight states, data base compatibility is  a necessity.  Comparable
data first require  uniform sampling and laboratory methodology  and  inter-
comparison studies  and  quality control must be incorporated  into the sur-
veillance  program.  For the Great Lakes International  Surveillance  Plan this
is  being coordinated by the Data Quality  Work Group of the Surveillance  Sub-
 'A  binational body which  is responsible for  the  implementation  of the U.S.-
 Canada Great Lakes Agreement

                                      40

-------
    Generally, the data  requirements  for  model  calibration and verification
are different than those for  detecting  and  quantifying  objective violations
and water quality trends.   The  intensity  of sampling  depends on the time and
space scale for water quality variables to  which  the  model is being devel-
oped and applied.  Table 1  includes  a list  of  eutrophication models that
were recently employed to establish  the target  phosphorus  loadings  for the
renegotiated Great Lakes Agreement with Canada  (Bierman 1979).  These models
are similar in that they relate  loadings  of phosphorus  to  phosphorus and
phytoplankton biomass (represented by dry weight  or chlorophyll  a_).  They
are different in that each  represents a unique  hypothesis  of cause  and
effect.  Each is an attempt to  describe the eutrophication process  for the
subject lake (or lakes)  to  a  different  level of complexity in terms of time
and space and biological and  chemical resolution.

Input Requirements

    Inputs represent the "knowns"  in  the  mathematical expressions which re-
present the model.  All  of  the  models require  basic morphometric data.   In-
formation on depth, volume, hydraulic detention time  are normally available
for U.S. lakes because of extensive  work  done  in  the  past  for other purposes
such as navigation charts,  flood control, and  fish management and this  in-
formation remains almost constant  in  time relative to other  inputs.

External Loads

    The mass loads of the primary model variables represent  the  "forcing
functions" of the model  equations.   Loads are  estimated by the product  of
water inflow and concentration.  Extensive  work has been done to develop
loadings for the Great Lakes  models  (Corps  of  Engineers 1975;  International
Joint Commission 1976) and  an extensive and unique data base is  required for
this purpose.  The U.S.  Geological Survey (USGS) measures  flows  of  most of
the major Great Lakes tributaries  and these data  are  available through  both
USGS and EPA data bases.  State  and  Provincial  governments maintain monthly
or bi-monthly water quality monitoring  sites near mouths of  most significant
tributaries as required  by  the  U.S.-Canadian Agreement  and these data are
stored in computerized data bases.

    The resolution and accuracy  to which  loads  must be  measured  depends on
the system and the model.   Vollenweider and Chapra's whole lake  models  need
loads for just phosphorus estimated  on  an annual  average basis.  Thomann and
DiToro's 2-layer models for Lakes Ontario (Thomann et^ _al_.  1975)  and Huron
(DiToro and Matystik 1979)  also  operate with annual loadings because of the
long hydraulic detention times of these lakes,  23 and 8 years, respectively.
DiToro's model (DiToro and  Connolly  1979) of Lake Erie  includes  three hori-
zontal  segments with three  layers with  hydraulic  detention times on the or-
der of three months for the Western  Basin to about 1-1/2 years for  the  cen-
tral basin and seasonal  loadings are  needed for this  finer resolution.
Bierman's five segment model  of  Saginaw Bay (Bierman  ert aj_ 1979) requires
loadings resolved to the same degree  as the daily hydrograph of  Saginaw
River because of the short  detention  time of the  smallest  segment.
                                     41

-------
TABLE 1.  SUMMARY OF PRINCIPAL MODEL CHARACTERISTICS (Bierman 1979)
	 : 	 	 —


Vollenweider1
Characteristic (All Basins)
Time Dependence
Dynamic
Steady-State X
Spatial Segmentation
None X
Horizontal
Vertical
Input Requirements
External loads for
primary variables X
Depth X
Volume X
Hydraulic detention
time X
Temperature
Light
Water circulation
rates
Sediment nutrient
release rates
Primary Variables
Phosphorus X
Nitrogen
Silicon
Total forms only X
Available and
unavailable forms
Secondary Variables
Chlorophyll X
Diatom/Non-diatom
chlorophyll
Multi-class biomass
Zooplankton
Dissolved Oxygen X
Direct Calculations
Empirical correla-
tion X
Thomann/3
DiToro4
(Lakes
Chapra^ Ontario
(All Basins) & Huron)
XV
A



X X
X


X X
X X
X X

X
X
X

X



X X
X

X

X

X X



X
X
X

X

i~ a
DiToro5 Bierman0
(Lake (Saginaw
Erie) Bay)
y V
A . A

x
A
X
X


x x.
XV
X
Xw
X


X X
X\l
X

X X

X

X X
X X
X X


X X



X
X
X X
X
X X



],From Vollenweider 1975.
^From Chapra 1977.
From Thomann _et al_. 1975.
,IFrom DiToro
^From DiToro
42 From Bierman
and Matystik 1979.
and Connolly 1979.
et al_. 1979.

-------
Primary and Secondary  Variables

    The models  calculate  concentrations  of primary and  secondary variables
as shown in Table  1.   The  simulations  are  compared to actual  data during
calibration and model  coefficents  adjusted withi"  acceptable  ranges until
the simulated concentrations  describe  the  data  to  a satisfactory degree.
Thomann (Thomann e_t  aj_ 1979)  has  developed a  rigorous statistical approach
to reduce  arbitrary  and qualitative  judgement involved  in  this  process.

    To resolve  seasonal variation  in nutrient and  biomass  concentrations
enough data are required  to estimate a mean and standard error  for each  of
the model  segments at  a sampling  frequency sufficient to resolve important
fluctuations.   Rigorous approaches for sampling design  are lacking but  in
general for each of  the Great  Lakes  ten  to twelve  sampling cruises are  re-
quired at  a station  density of one station per  100 square  miles for Erie and
Ontario and three  stations per 1000  square miles for Michigan,  Huron, and
Superior.  Vertical  sampling  density is  related to defining the thermocline
and associated  chemoclines but generally the  Great Lakes surveillance plan
specifies  depth samples at 1 meter,  mid  epilimn ion,  lower  epilimn ion, upper
hypolimnion, 1  meter above bottom (International Joint  Commission, 1978).

Uniformity

    An implied  data  requirement of a modeling project is that all  data
should be  obtained concurrently.   Each lake and input sample must be ana-
lyzed for  all model  variables.  For  example,  one cannot use ammonia data
from a previous study  and combine  it with  nitrate  data  for the  current  study
and hope to model  the  nitrogen cycle.  Also,  one cannot use phosphorus  load-
ings from  one time period and  combine  it with concentration data from
another and hope to  get reliable  results.   Therefore, this requirement  ne-
cessitates large,  coordinated  surveillance programs  for the Great Lakes  in-
volving many agencies  and  laboratories.  A uniformity of methods must be
maintained along with  a common approach  to data management.

    In summary, enough data must  be  available to obtain statistically signi-
ficant estimates of mass  loads and average concentrations  for each variable
in each segment and  each  time  period (cruise).   The  dynamic, multicompart-
ment, multi-segment  (high resolution models)  require more  data  than the
steady state, single segment  (whole-lake)  single compartment  (one variable)
models.  It is  not the purpose of this discussion  to judge the  merits of
each of the models or model types.   The  point is that modeling  projects
whose purpose is to obtain understanding of limnological processes at high
resolution require significantly more  data and,  therefore,  data management
becomes much more critical.
GREAT LAKES DATA BASES

    One means to effect data base uniformity  is to require the  surveillance
and research organizations to use the same computer  and data base  system.
This possibility was considered by the Data Management Work Group  of  the  IOC
                                    43

-------
Surveillance Subcommittee but it was determined to be too  complex  to  imple-
ment between two countries.  Rather it was decided to recommend maintenance
of existing data base systems with separate agreements between parties  to
exchange data as needed.  In the U.S., however, it has become EPA  policy to
require all data collected by organizations under contracts, grants or
interagency agreements to be stored into its data base system, STORE!
(International Joint Commission, in preparation).

    STORE! (STOrage-RETrieval) is a national, on-line data base system
developed by EPA (andHpredecessor agencies) for the archiving of water
quality data.  Because of its utility, ease of use, and efficiencies, STORET
is used by most all U.S. State and Federal agencies involved with  collection
of water quality information.  The STORET water quality file contains about
60 million observations which are accessible on-line via a telecommunication
network.

    For the Great Lakes, STORET is viewed by many as an essential  tool  for
meeting the mandates of federal laws and the Great Lakes Water Quality
Agreement.  Not only does it provide for long-term storage of data but  it
also provides for exchange of data as well as a means to statistically  ana-
lyze data.  Because the data base resides on on-line disks, access can  be
made by any user at their convenience via a telephone communications  net-
work.  This eliminates much of the bureaucracy that has traditionally been
associated with accessing data from other agencies.

    Although STORET and the computer system on which it resides provide  for
some statistical application, many users would rather obtain copies of  data
sets and transfer these to their own computer where they may have  available
more specialized analysis programs.  At the EPA, LLRS a system is  being
developed whereby subsets of the STORET are retrieved and telecommunicated
to an in-house POP 11/45 minicomputer.  This "Mini-STORET" system  will  have
various options which the user may specify.  A schematic of this is shown in
Figure 2.  The user will have the choice of various output formats, hard
copy listings, files for use by model programs, graphical output,  or  files
for statistical programs.

    The key objective is to make data manipulation as efficient as possible
and easily accessible by non-computer personnel for interpretation.   For
example using manual techniques it may take a man-year just to get the  data
in the proper formats for modeling purposes.  Using the Mini-STORET system
it is expected that this will be reduced by at least 75%.


EXISTING GREAT LAKES DATA IN STORET

    The Great Lakes data base in STORET consists of data collected by the
U.S.  participants in the Great Lakes Surveillance Plan and their grantees
and contractors.  Also, all the open lake data collected by the Canadian
Center for Inland Waters (CCIW) has been stored through an agreement  between
CCIW and EPA, LLRS.  In exchange for these data, CCIW has been provided  with
a STORET account for direct access to all U.S. data.  Historical data has


                                     44

-------
                       PRIMARY DATA BASES
                       r

STORE!





BIO STORE!





IN-HOUSE
DATA





0!HER
DA!A

                                                     I
                                                  !RANSFER
                                                 AND FORMA!
                                                 CONVERSION
en
 IN-HOUSE
 WORKING
DA!A BASE
               OUTPUT AND ANALYSIS PROGRAMS
RAW DA!A
LIS!ING


INVEN!ORY
LIS!ING


SIMPLE
S!A!IS!ICS




COMPLEX
STATISTICS


GRAPHICAL
OUTPUT


                                                                                           1
                                             MATHEMATICAL MODEL
                                                DATA FORMATS
                          Figure 2.   Large Lakes Research  Station mini-storet system.

-------
been stored where it has been available, but this  is  a  very tedious and ex-
pensive task.

    A complete inventory of all Great Lakes Data stored  in  STORE! is  con-
tained in Appendix A.  A summary of this inventory  is given in  Table  2.  As
this table indicates there are over 3 million observations  for  the Great
Lakes stored in STORET or about 5% of the U.S. water  quality file. This is
not a significant proportion considering that the Great  Lakes represents
about 95% of the surface freshwater in the U.S.  Figures  3  through 8  show
the time distribution of data availability for each lake.   Several interest-
ing observations can be made from these graphs that reveal  the  history of
Great Lakes surveillance.  First it appears that prior  to 1960  most data
collection efforts were done on the connecting channels.  The period  1962
through 1966 represent the first Federal surveillance effort for  the  open
lakes.  For Lake Ontario the peak in 1972 represents  the  data collected for
the International Field Year on the Great Lakes.  The 1975  peaks  represent
the surveillance effort of the IJC Upper Lakes Reference  Study.   Lake Erie
was the subject of intensive sampling from 1967 to  1975  by  both U.S.  and
Canadian agencies and the decline in 1976-1977 was  due  to the implementation
of the IJC Surveillance plan which diverted most of the  U.S.  effort for that
period to Lake Michigan and a new effort for Erie in  1978 and 1979.

    The number of observations does not necessarily reflect the utility of
these data for modeling purposes, however; but Table  3 might give some indi-
cation of this for eutrophication models.  Ideally, each  sample collected
should have been analyzed for the basic state variables  listed  in Table 1.
It can be seen that Chlorophyll a^ data are generally  lacking.   For all  the
lakes except Michigan Kjeldahl nitrogen data appears  to  be  deficient.   On
the other hand there appears to be an over abundance  of  silica  data.   For
Lake Michigan there is a higher proportion of phosphorus  to nitrogen  data.
Since this table includes the entire period of record,  it may not represent
the more recent attempts by the Surveillance Subcommittee to obtain data for
modeling purposes.  To determine exactly whether existing data  in STORET are
suitable for modeling purposes, the interested reader is  encouraged to re-
view "raw" data in detail.  Appendix B presents examples  of STORET retrieval
procedures.
BIOSTORET

    Biological data have always presented difficulties for  data management.
There exists such a variety of samples, components  and characteristics,
that STORET has not been able to deal with the parameter code  requirements.
This is particularly the case for toxonomic data.  In response to  the  need
for a biological data base, EPA has developed a specialized  system,  BIO-
STORET.  The system is similar to STORET in that it is user  oriented and  re-
ferences samples to sample location, depth, time, and concentration  but ex-
tends the capability to deal  with toxonomic information as  well as other
descriptive data.  This system and data base are in a pilot  stage  and  some
of the Great Lakes data are being used to test the system.   Appendix C con-
tains an example BIOSTORET retrieval, command file, and output.
                                     46

-------
TABLE 2.  SUMMARY OF GREAT LAKES DATA  IN STORET
               (As of June 1979)

Lake
Superior
Michigan
Huron
Erie
Ontario
Total Lakes
Connecting Channel
St. Mary's River
St. Clair River
Lake St. Clair
Detroit River
Niagara River
Total Conn. Channels
Total

Number of
Stations
414
2,249
1,089
2,426
1,653
7,831
162
159
275
335
66
997
8,828

Number of
Observations
115,621
663,144
306,717
1,050,639
592,294
2,728,415
51,795
46,863
31,472
144,017
45,260
319,407
3,047,822

Number of
Samples
8,944
70,463
26,582
128,445
78,610
313,044
4,653
5,532
2,973
21,376
4,246
38,780
351,824
                      47

-------
45,000
40,000
CO
2 35,000
1-
j£ 30,000
UJ
CO
0 25,000
LL
2 20,000
LLJ
^ 15,000
"2.
10,000
5,000
0
-
_

-
-
—

-
-
-
, 	 |,|


1










ll..
^^ ^* CO IO ^^ O) ^~* CO LO ^^ O5
CO CO CO CO f,p CO ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
*•" ^™* T^" T" " *™* 1^~ **" ^— >- T*1^ r~* T~
                V
                                     YEAR
Figure  3.  Summary of Lake Superior data from Storet water quality  file.
                                 48

-------
  oc

  DO
  O
  LL
  O
  QC

  CD
80,000

70,000

60,000

50,000

40,000

30,000

20,000

10,000

      0
                il
              o   ^
              (O   CO
              O)   O)
              V
                                YEAR
Figure 4.  Summary of Lake Michigan data from Storet water quality file.
                              49

-------
   100,000


    90,000


g  80,000
O

<  70,000


gj  60,000
CO
O
u-
50,000


40,000


30,000


20,000


10,000


     0
1 — •
.1 .11

o r- co LO r^ CD r-
co co co co co co r*-
CD CD CD CD CD CD CD
I
1...
oo LO r*. CD
r^ r^ r^ r^
O) CD CD CD
            V
                               YEAR
 Figure 5.  Summary of Lake Huron data from Storet water quality file,
                             50

-------
 CO
120,000


110,000


100,000


 90,000
 <   80,000

 oc
 gj   70,000
 CO
 O
 u.   60,000
 O


 "J   50,000
40,000


30,000


20,000


10,000


     0
               .ll
                      ll

                                                 o>
             V
                              YEAR
Figure 6.  Summary of Lake Erie data from Storet water quality file
                           51

-------
    180,000


    160,000
CO

2  140,000


>  120,000
LU
CO
g  100,000

UL

°   80,000



     60,000


     40,000


     20,000


          0
cc
LU
CO
             o
             CD
             V

                                YEAR
Figure 7.  Surmiary of Lake Ontario data from Storet water quality file.
                             52

-------
60,000
55,000
50,000
45,000
CO
o
~ 40,000
c 35,000
LLJ
CO
QQ
0 30,000
LJ_
O
a: 25,000
LLI
m
§ 20,000
1 5,000
10,000
5,000
0
-
-
-
^



-



"

-


"
-
-
-



















II

0 T-
CO CO
O) O)










































CO
CO
O)








































I
































































in r»» o>
CO CO
o> o>
CO
o>











































IM
.

T- CO IT) px O5

O) G) O) O) O)
            V
                                  YEAR
Figure  8.  Summary of Connecting Channels data from Storet water
                         quality file.
                              53

-------
           TABLE 3.  STORE! WATER QUALITY FILE SUMMARY OF GREAT LAKES
                     EUTROPHICATION DATA (As of June 1979)


                                       Number of Observations               '""'
                                                                     Connecting
	Superior  Michigan   Huron    Erie    Ontario   Channels

Total Phosphorus       3,483     13,805   11,867   16,702   23,342      6,389

Phosphorus
 Dissolved Ortho       3,729      6,531    8,638   13,064   19,427        331

Phosphorus Dissolved   2,610      5,891   10,531   11,889   16,272      1,761
Total Kjeldahl
 Nitrogen                275      3,969    3,282    5,003    7,380      2,499

N02 + N03 Dissolved    3,793      2,680   11,799    9,761   20,534        275

NH3-N Dissolved        3,639      3,592    9,868    8,957   22,937        261



Silica Dissolved       3,853      6,717   12,404   16,508   24,787      1,004
Chlorophyll 'A'
 (Corrected)             -          388    3,168    6,830    9,200
Temperature            7,236     27,675   19,942   96,559   56,979     23,613
                                       54

-------
RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS

    Data handling is often done  as  an  afterthought.   As  a  result,  deadlines
have been missed, scientific personnel  have  been misused,  data  have  been
lost, more errors have been made, and  project  effectiveness  reduced.   To
remedy this managers must allocate  adequate  resources for  data  management.
Resources include a budget, trained  personnel,  and  adequate  computer  hard-
ware and software.

    The EPA, Large Lakes Research Station eutrophication studies on  Saginaw
Bay devoted about 10% of total resources to  data management.  This covered
all effort required to get results  from bench  sheets  to  a  data  base.

    Data base costs (STORET) include initial storage  charges  (computer time)
of about $.01 per observation  and storage changes of  about $.005 per  obser-
vation per year.  Based on these unit  costs  Great Lakes  data  base  costs
about $15,000. per year to maintain  on  disk.   (The  entire  STORET water
quality file costs about $300,000.  per  year  to  maintain).  Another 10 to  15
percent of total surveillance  resources are  required  for statistical  ana-
lysis and modeling.


CONCLUSIONS

    Efficient data management  is essential to water quality management and
research programs.  Program managers must recognize the  role  of data  manage-
ment and make adequate staffing  and  budget provisions for  its implementa-
tion.  This is the case for whatever purpose to which the  data  are being
applied; however, it is an absolute  requirement for timely development of
mathematical models.

    Models require complete sets of  data for all state variables for  the
time and space resolution desired.   Although the most critical  need for
modeling is proper surveillance  design  in the first place, accurate and
timely data processing plays a key  role in the  modeling  process.  As  models
become more complex the quantity and complexity of  data  increases  and auto-
mated, computerized data base  and data  analysis tools become more  important.
As a rule of thumb about 10% of  total  project costs should be devoted to
data management.


REFERENCES

Bierman, Victor J., Jr.  1979.  A comparison of models developed for  phos-
    phorus management in the Great Lakes.  Prepared for  Conference on Phos-
    phorus Management Strategies for the Great  Lakes, Rochester, N.Y.  April
    17-19, 1979  (in press).

Bierman, V.J.,  Jr., D.M. Dolan, E.F. Stoermer,  J.E. Gannon and  V.E. Smith.
    1979.   The development and calibration of a multi-class,  internal pool,
    phytoplankton model for Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron.  In press, EPA Ecolo-
    gical  Research Series.

                                     55

-------
Chapra, S.C.  1977.  Total Phosphorus model for the Great Lakes.   Journal  of
    the Environmental Engineering Division, American Society of Civil
    Engineers.  103 (EE2):147-161.

Corps of Engineers, Department of Army, Buffalo District.  Lake Erie Waste-
    water Management Study, Preliminary Feasibility Study, Volume  1 and  2,
    December 1975.

DiToro, D.M. and W. Matystik, Jr.  1979.  Mathematical models of water
    quality in large lakes, Part I: Lake Huron and Saginaw Bay model devel-
    opment, verification, and simulations.  EPA Ecological Research In Pre-
    paration, EPA Ecological  Research Series.

DiToro, D.M. and J.F. Connolly.  1979.  Mathematical models of water quality
    in large lak^es, Part II:  Lake Erie.  In preparation, EPA, Ecological
    Research Series.

Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement of 1978 Agreement with annexes and terms
    of reference between the  United States of America and Canada,  signed at
    Ottawa, November 22, 1978.

International Joint Commission.  In preparation.   Data Management  and Inter-
    pretation component of the Lake Erie Surveillance Plan prepared by the
    Data Management and Interpretation Work Group for the Surveillance Sub-
    committee, Great Lakes Water Quality Board, June 1979.

International Joint Commission.  1976.   Water Quality Board.  Great Lakes
    Water Quality 1975, Appendix B, Surveillance  Subcommittee Report.  July
    1976.

International Joint Commission.  1978.  Lake Erie Surveillance Plan prepared
    by the Lake Erie Work Group for the Surveillance Subcommittee, Great
    Lakes Water Quality Board,   Revised March 1978.

Thomann, R.V., D.M. DiToro, R.P. Winfield and D.I. O'Connor.  1975.  Mathe-
    matical modeling of phytoplankton in Lake Ontario, I. Model development
    and verification, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Ecological Re-
    search Series.  EPA-600/3-76-065.

Thomann, R.V., R.P. Winfield, J.I.  Segma.  1979.   Verification Analysis of
    Lake Ontario and Rochester Embayment Three Dimensional Eutrophication
    Model.  In press, EPA Ecological  Research Series.

Vollenweider, R.A.  1975.  Input-output models with spatial  reference to the
    phosphorus loading concept in limnology.  Schweigresche Zeitschrift fur
    Hydrologie.   37:53-84.
                                     56

-------
                     APPENDIX A

INVENTORY OF WATER QUALITY DATA FOR THE GREAT LAKES
     CONTAINED ON THE STORET WATER QUALITY FILE
            Available upon request from:

               William L.  Richardson
               EPA, Large  Lakes Research  Station
               9311 Groh Road
               Grosse He, Michigan  48138
                     APPENDIX B

      EXAMPLES OF STORET RETRIEVAL  PROCEDURES


            Available upon  request  from:

              William L.  Richardson
              U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency
              Large Lakes Research  Station
              9311  Groh Road
              Grosse He, Michigan   48138



                     APPENDIX C

  EXAMPLES OF BIOSTORET RETRIEVALS  AND  PROCEDURES


            Available upon  request  from:

               William L. Richardson
               U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
               Large Lakes  Research Station
               9311 Groh  Road
               Grosse He,  Michigan  48138
                        57

-------
                                 SECTION 4

            OPTIMAL SAMPLING FOR LONG TERM TRENDS IN LAKE HURON

                             David M. Dolan1
INTRODUCTION

    A major goal of the International Surveillance Program for the Great
Lakes is to detect long-term changes in the concentrations of various  para-
meters in each of the lakes.  With this in mind, the Lake Huron Work Group
of the Surveillance Subcommittee of the International Joint Commission  has
designed a Lake Huron Surveillance Plan.  The plan calls for intensive  sam-
pling of the main lake in 1980, and sampling of all the major tributaries
each year.  The intensive main lake effort will be repeated in 1989, and
again in 1998.  After each intensive sampling, the data will be examined and
trends evaluated.

    In order for the Surveillance Program to be successful, data must  be
provided of sufficient quality so that trends may be accurately assessed.
The required accuracy for trend detection can be expressed conveniently in
probablistic terms (DePalma 1977).  For example, if it is desired to detect
changes in the lakewide average concentration of chloride of 1 mg/jl or
greater with 90% probability, it can be shown that the standard error  of
chloride measurements must not exceed 0.158 mg/Ji.  Since the measurement
procedure for chloride is well established, the usual way to decrease  the
standard error is to increase the number of observations.  However, each ad-
ditional sample collected results in higher surveillance costs.  Thus,  there
is a trade-off between accuracy and funds required.  A method is needed to
optimize the sampling program to obtain the required accuracy at minimum
cost.

    If a reliable mathematical model was available for the parameter of in-
terest for Lake Huron, sampling costs could be reduced drastically.  It
would  only be necessary to update the information on model forcing func-
tions, such as loading rates and water movements, to accurately identify
trends.   Unfortunately, models of Lake Huron, even for the simplest conser-
vative substances, are imperfect because of inaccurate model parameters.   It
is intuitively obvious that a procedure which would combine the best infor-
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Large Lakes Research Station,  Grosse
 lie, Michigan 48138.
                                     58

-------
mation available from a model with  the  information  from sampling  a lake
would be highly desirable and could  result  in  significant  cost  savings.
Such a procedure is available using  the  Kalman  filtering technique.

    The Kalman filter (Kalman 1960;  Kalman  and  Bucy 1961)  is  an informa-
tion processing technique that  has  had much  use in  aerospace  engineering.
It combines model calculations  and  sampling  results to  estimate a parameter
of interest.  The estimate  is,  ideally,  better  than one obtained  from either
a model or a series of measurements  alone.   The basic function  of the Kalman
filter is the calculation of the Kalman  gain.   This gain provides the rela-
tive weighting of model and measurements  to  obtain  a estimate at  a desired
time.  If the model is inaccurate compared  to  the data,  the data  will  re-
ceive most of the weight.   If the data  is "noisy" compared to the model, the
model estimate will be given the most weight.   The  advantage  of the  line-
arized Kalman filter for lake concentration  sample  optimization is that the
estimation errors at future times can be  calculated independently of  the
actual concentration estimates.  Thus, as a  model increases in  accuracy as
more data becomes available, the model output will  receive higher weight in
the estimate, and fewer measurements will be necessary  to meet  accuracy re-
quirements.

    The Kalman filtering technique  has been  applied to  lake concentration
estimation for the case of  Lake Michigan  (DePalma et^ jil_. 1979).   This  paper
is an application of the procedure  to Lake  Huron.


THE LAKE HURON SYSTEM

    The Lake Huron system has been  described in detail  elsewhere  (Upper
Lakes Reference Group 1977).  The system, the third largest of  the Great
Lakes by volume, is composed of four interconnected water bodies:   the  main
lake, Saginaw Bay, North Channel and Georgian Bay (Figure 1).   It is  con-
nected to Lake Michigan at  the  Straits of Mackinac,  to  Lake Superior  by the
St. Mary's River and to Lake St. Clair by the St. Clair  River (Table  1).  In

              TABLE 1.  LAKE HURON MAJOR  INFLOWS AND OUTFLOWS
Lake Route
Michigan Straits of Mackinac
Superior St. Mary's River
St. Clair St. Clair River
Annual Average Flow
1920 m3/sec
2110 m3/sec
5050 m3/sec
general, water entering in the northern part of the  lake flows  south  along
the Michigan coast.  There are also strong northern  currents  along the
Ontario coast (Figure 1).

    At present, main Lake Huron is considered to be  an oligotrophic  lake, as
is indicated by a number of chemical and biological  parameters  (Table 2).

                                     59

-------
                                                              Midland Bay
                                                           Penetanguishene Bay
                                                           WASAGA BEACH
                                                              • Municipality

                                                              • Open Water Fith
                                                                Collection Suikxi
                                                         LOCATION  MAP
                                                              OF
                                                          LAKE  HURON
Figure 1.   The  Lake  Huron  system.

-------
      TABLE 2.  CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL  INDICATORS OF TROPHIC  STATUS  -
                              MAIN LAKE  HURON
Nutrients
    Spring Average Concentration
Total Phosphorus
Total Dissolved Phosphorus
Dissolved Reactive Phosphate
Dissolved Nitrate & Nitrite
Dissolved Ammonia
Dissolved Reactive Silicate
Dissolved Oxygen
5.4 yg/£
3.2 yg/£
0.9 yg/£
282.4 yg/£
6.1 yg/£
1.46 mg/£
13.2 mg/£
Biology
   Chlorophyll a_
   Phytoplankton Biomass
   Zooplankton Biomass
               1.4 yg/£
     1000 mg/m3 (10% blue-green)
60 mg/m3 (60% calanoid copepods)
Georgian Bay is also classed as oligotrophic, and North Channel  is  con-
sidered mesotrophic.  However, Saginaw Bay  is highly enriched and  is classed
as eutrophic.  This bay receives wastes from the highly populated  Saginaw
River Basin.  These wastes include both industrial discharges and  agricul-
tural runoff.  The  influence of this bay on trends in the main  lake is sub-
stantial as will be shown.

    As a result of  the influence of Saginaw Bay, the assumption  of  a homo-
genous main lake cannot be made in the case of Lake Huron.   In the  previous
application of Kalman filtering to Lake Michigan, the open  lake  was treated
as one, well-mixed  segment.  Also, unlike Lake Michigan, Lake Huron receives
substantial net input of water from two other Great Lakes.   Thus,  the appli-
cation of this procedure to Lake Huron has  some unique and  interesting as-
pects.

    Loadings of nutrients to Lake Huron are expected to increase in the next
three decades due to industrial and urban growth.  Even slight increases in
the present levels  of phosphorus and nitrogen concentrations threaten the
oligotrophic status of the main lake.  The  International Joint Commission
has set a goal of non-degradation for this  lake.  Therefore, any increase  in
nutrient levels would not be in accordance with this goal.   It is  for this
reason, that the optimal sampling design procedure has been  applied to the
nutrient parameters total phosphorus and nitrate-nitrite nitrogen.
MASS BALANCE MODEL

    The model to be used with the Kalman filter to provide estimates of  lake
concentration for trend detection is a dynamic mass balance model  (Figure
2).  The basic equation for each substance is:
                                     61

-------
     CONCEPTUAL WHOLE-SYSTEM MASS-BALANCE MODEL
TRIBUTARY AND
 POINT SOURCES
 LAKE INFLOW
                        ATMOSPHERE
1
                            LAKE

                           SYSTEM
                            I
                        PERMANENT
                         SEDIMENT
                       LAKE
                       OUTFLOW
              Figure 2. Simplified mass balance model

-------
    V j= = W + E QIN.*CINi - Z QOUT.*c - k*c*V                        (1)


where:  V is the volume of the body of water


        g£ is the rate of change  in concentration with  time.


        W is the loading rate.

        QIN. is the flow rate of  the  ith input


        CIN.J is the concentration of  the ith  input


        QOUT. is the flow rate of the ith output
            •J

        c is the concentration in the water body.

        k is the first order removal  coefficient which  may be  an  apparent
          settling rate or a degradation constant.

Included in the W term are atmospheric loading, direct  loadings and  small
tributary loadings.  QIN and QOUT refer to major water  bodies  that  interact
with the one of interest.  An equation similar to (1) is written  for  each
body of water that can be considered  well-mixed.  In the case  of  main Lake
Huron, 2 segments must be formed, Northern Lake Huron and Southern  Lake
Huron.  The division of the lake  follows that used by DiToro  (in  press).  A
separate mass balance equation is written for each segment and the  two are
coupled:

       dc,         2
           = W  +
    V  g-  = W] +   I  QIN. CII^- QNS  c1  -  k  c]V]                      (2)
    V2 3T = W2 + QNS cl " QOUT C2  "  k C2  V2

where:  QNS is the net flow between northern  and  southern  Lake  Huron.


Since c-] appears in both equations, they are  considered  to  be coupled.
These equations are then linearized about  nominal  values,  CNOM]  and  CNOM2
for use in the Kalman filter procedure.

    Note that in (2) the QIN-j's refer to flows from Lake Michigan  and  Lake
Superior.  The CINj's are concentrations of these  lakes  which are  subject to
dynamics different from Lake Huron.   To avoid  including  added complexity  in
the model, these concentrations are treated as inputs.   In  other words, the
boundary concentrations for the lake  are modeled  separately and  then stored
for later use with this model.

                                      63

-------
MEASUREMENTS

    There  are three types of measurements  that  can  be  made on the Lake Huron
system that will  improve the estimate of  lakewide concentrations.  The first
type  is the actual sampling of the open lake.   A second  type puts the prin-
cipal of mass balance to use:  tributary  and point  source  sampling.   Here
the assumption  is that if inputs are changing,  then  lake concentrations
must, as a consequence, change.  The third type is  actually a miscellaneous
category and includes all field and laboratory  measurements that improve the
accuracy of the mass balance model, and thus improve the estimate.   Such
measurements include apparent settling velocity, boundary  flow rates, atmos-
pheric loading  rates, and intersegmental exchange rates  for the case of more
than  one segment.  Each of these types of measurements can improve  the ac-
curacy of  concentration estimates for trend detection  with the use  of a
Kalman filter.

    The actual  sampling of the open lake  is the most direct way to  determine
the lakewide average concentration of a substance.   If unlimited funds were
available, a model would not be necessary.  However, open  lake sampling
cruises are expensive and represent a major surveillance effort. Lake Huron
is to be sampled  intensively only every nine years.  This  is, in part, a re-
flection of the enormous costs of such a project.   However, if enough
samples are taken, open lake concentrations can be  determined quite  accu-
rately.

    Tributary sampling is also extremely expensive.  In  this  case each in-
dividual tributary must be sampled.  There are  23 major  tributaries  to Lake
Huron.  Since loading is often a seasonal phenomemon,  accurate time  his-
tories for each tributary are necessary.  Fortunately, there  are estimation
methods for those tributaries with complete flow records so that daily sam-
pling is not necessary (Dolan et_ aj_. in preparation; U.S.  Army Corps of
Engineers  1975).  Even if the tributary loads are known  accurately,  how-
ever, the  resultant concentration estimate for  the  lake  is still influenced
by the accuracy of the model, including parameters  and other  forcing func-
tions .

    These  various model parameters and forcing  functions can  be determined
to a considerable degree of accurancy by the proper experiments in  both
field and  laboratory.  Many investigators have  devised ways to estimate ap-
parent settling velocity.  Atmospheric deposition of pollutants is  the sub-
ject of much current research (Murphy and Doskey 1975; Murphy 1975;  Delumyea
and Pete!  1979).  There are several methods available  for  estimating bound-
ary flows  and intersegmental exchanges (Quinn 1977; Chapra 1979; Upper Lakes
Reference Group 1977; Dolan et aj[. in preparation).  If  one of these com-
ponents is particularly limiting with regard to accuracy of concentration
estimates, specific research aimed at improving the knowledge of the com-
ponent can be initiated.

    Obviously,  there are costs and benefits associated with each of  the
three types.   The techniques described in this  paper can choose the  optimal
conbinations  of these measurements to meet the  accuracy  constraints  at mini-
mum costs.

                                     64

-------
OPTIMAL SAMPLING STRATEGY

    For purposes of comparison, the proposed Lake Huron work group surveil-
lance plan will be evaluated for trend detection in each of the two segments
of main Lake Huron.  The optimal strategy will then be presented.  It should
be noted that the surveillance plan includes sampling for many other para-
meters besides nitrate-nitrite and total phosphorus and thus, it  is not
likely to be optimal with regard to these two parameters.

    As stated previously, any increase in nutrient levels in Lake Huron
would not be in accordance with IJC goals for this lake.  Therefore, the
criteria for trend detection is the following:  The sampling plan must de-
tect changes of 1 yg/A of total phosphorus and 50 yg/A of nitrate-nitrite
with 90% certainty every 9 years.  This criterion is met with ease in the
northern Lake Huron segment (Table 3).  In the south, only the nitrate-

    TABLE 3.  LAKE HURON SURVEILLANCE PLAN TREND DETECTION CAPABILITIES

                          Northern Lake               Southern Lake
                      w/o filter   w filter	w/o filter   w filter
Parameter

  Nitrate Nitrite
      1980             18 yg/A     18 yg/A          37 yg/A     36 yg/A
      1989             18 yg/A     18 yg/A          37 yg/A     35 yg/A
      1998             18 yg/A     18 yg/A          37 yg/A     35 yg/A


  Total Phosphorus
      1980             .60 yg/A     .60 yg/A        1.83 yg/A   1.67 yg/A
      1989             .60 yg/A     .59 yg/A        1.83 yg/A   1.64 yg/A
      1998             .60 yg/A     .54 yg/A        1.83 yg/A   1.63 yg/A


nitrite criterion is met.  The use of the Kalman filter does improve the
accuracy of the estimate slightly, but the plan as it is presently con-
ceived, cannot detect  changes in total phosphorus of 1 yg/A in southern Lake
Huron.

    In order to meet this criterion, it can be shown that 65 stations must
be added to the open lake sampling plan in the southern segment of the lake.
This results in a total of 138 stations for the total main lake effort.  If
the optimization procedure developed for Lake Michigan (DePalma 1977) is
utilized it can be shown that accuracy criteria in both lake segments can be
met with 105 stations  if the only goal of sampling is trend detection.  This
assumes that accuracy  requirements are met exactly and that the Kalman fil-
ter is used in conjunction with a mass balance model to improve the esti-
mates where possible.  This comparison emphasizes that uniform spatial
coverage of the open lake is not desirable for trend detection.  Rather, it
is more important to locate extra stations in areas of high spatial vari-
ability.


                                     65

-------
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

    It can be seen from Table 3 that the use of the filter  in conjunction
with the mass balance model previously described, only marginally  improves
the accuracy of the concentration estimates.  This is an  indication  that the
model itself is inaccurate, probably because some or all  of the model  para-
meters and forcing functions are imperfectly characterized.  If some of
these quantities can be better determined, the model accuracy will  improve,
the trend detection capability will increase and the associated sampling
costs will decrease.

    The Kalman filtering technique has been used to estimate improvements in
trend detection accuracy attributable to research and experimentation  in
each of five areas:

    1.  Atmospheric Loading - Of all the input to lakes of  pollutants,
        this component is usually the least accurately known.  Research
        is presently being conducted to improve measurement accuracy
        of atmospheric loading (Murphy 1975; Delumyea and Pete! 1979).
        Also, it is possible to model atmospheric fallout,  greatly  im-
        proving estimates of loading in areas where no sampling occurs
        (Sydor in press; Kabel 1975; Acres Consulting Services 1975).

    2.  Intralake Exchange - This is defined to be the net  effect of
        advection and diffusion at the assumed interface  between northern
        and southern Lake Huron.  Estimates of this quantity can be
        greatly improved using existing models.  The Lake Huron surveil-
        lance Plan includes a design for estimation of this parameter.

    3.  Interlake Exchange - This is defined to be the net  effect of
        advection and diffusion at interfaces with Lake Michigan, the
        St. Mary's River, and the St. Clair River.  The effects of  diffu-
        sion at the river interfaces is nil so that these two components
        can be easily improved by measuring flow rates.   Much work  has
        already been done on the Straits of Mackinac (Quinn 1977),  and
        these results with other measurements can greatly improve the
        accuracy of this component.

    4.  Initial Settling Velocity Uncertainty - At present, the pro-
        cedure assumes that very little is known about the  settling  rate
        of nutrients, and that knowledge improves as measurements  are
        taken.  In reality, much is already known, and more work is  on-
        going in this area (Chapra in press).

    5.  Tributary Load Estimation Error - This is always  a  large source
        of error in any lake model.  However, not only are  methods  of
        sampling improving for tributaries, but also methods of cal-
        culation to obtain better estimates with sparse data are be-
        coming available (Dolan in preparation).  In addition, 24%  of
        the tributary nutrient loads to Lake Huron come from the Saginaw
        River alone.  This tributary could be monitored intensively to
        reduce estimation errors.

                                     66

-------
    The increases in accuracy with  improvements  in  each  of  these  five areas
are compared to a base case which is the optimal  strategy with  no improve-
ments (Table 4).  The results are expressed  in terms  of  standard  errors  of

    TABLE 4.  SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS  FOR  STANDARD  ERROR (yg/£)  IN SOUTHERN
                      LAKE HURON FOR TOTAL PHOSPHORUS
Run Description
Present Optimum
Improve Atmospheric Estimates
Improve Intralake Exchange Estimates
Improve All Exchange Estimates
Improve Initial Settling Rate Accuracy
Improve Tributary Load Estimate
Improve All of the Above

1980
.1571
.1569
.1570
.1562
.1556
.1535
.1467
Year
1989
.1575
.1572
.1573
.1559
.1570
.1541
.1465

1998
.1569
.1566
.1568
.1551
.1567
.1536
.1456
Improve All of the Above Plus  Initial
Condition Estimates
Improve Open Lake Measurements
.1429
.0161
.1440
.0162
.1440
.0162
the estimates for total phosphorus  in  southern  Lake  Huron for  each year  in
which a determination of trends  is  desired.  These estimates are most  sensi-
tive to improvements in tributary  load estimation accuracy.  If all  five
areas are improved, the accuracy of the estimates would  increase by  7  per-
cent by 1998.  If, in addition, the initial concentration of total phos-
ptiorus had been better estimated, further gains  in accuracy would be rea-
lized.  For comparison purposes, the effect of  a 10-fold increase in the ac-
curacy of open lake measurements for total phosphorus  has been  included.
Naturally, the total phosphorus estimates are much more  sensitive to this
kind of improvement; however, such  increases in  accuracy would  probably  be
impossible to achieve in practice.
DISCUSSION

    Trend detection is an  important part of  any  lake  sampling  plan.   In  the
case of oligotrophic lakes such as Lake Huron, the  early observation  of
trends towards mesotrophy  is critical.  Given this  reasoning,  the  confidence
level of 90% used in this  analysis may be too low.  If  high  confidence  is
required, the use of a model becomes even more important.
                                     67

-------
     Each  of the  five  areas  for  improvement mentioned in the preceding sec-
 tion are  interesing for  reasons  beyond  mass balance modeling and thus may be
 the  subject of limnological  research  in the future.  If the optimal strategy
 for  trend detection  is recomputed  assuming significant improvement in all
 these areas,  substantial  reductions  in  the number of stations necessary for
 sampling  would be  realized  (Table  5).   Also,  the model's capabilities would
 increase  as measurements  are made,

      TABLE 5.   COMPARISON OF STATIONS REQUIRED BY DIFFERENT STRATEGIES

Strategy
Lake Huron Work Group Plan
Optimal Strategy

1980
138
105
Year
1989
138
104

1998
138
104
 Optimal  Strategy  with  Research  on  Model
    Parameters                                         85        83       79
     Another  advantage  would  be that  trends  for  other,  less  variable, para-
 meters;  such  as  chloride  could be  detected  with  the  help  of the model and
 the  tributary load  estimates even  during years when  no  lakewide measure-
 ments  were taken.
 CONCLUSION

     The  techniques  discussed  in this paper  are  extremely useful  for de-
 signing  and/or  evaluating a plan for trend  detection.   Even  if the model
 associated with the Kalman filter  is inaccurate,  the  procedure leads to
 orderly  acquisition and evaluation of data  pertaining  to trend detection.
 If  the model can be improved, significant increases  in  accuracy  can be
 realized or, alternatively, sampling costs  can  be  decreased.   In either
 case, these techniques provide a systematic way of evaluating  a  proposed
 measurement strategy as well  as determining if  another  strategy  could give
 substantial gains in accuracy.

     In the case of Lake Huron, application  of this procedure has shown that
 for  nutrients,  the northern segment of the  lake is over-sampled, while the
 southern segment is under-sampled.  This situation can  be improved by in-
 creasing the number of stations in the southern segment,  or  by improving  the
model to be used with the Kalman filter to  obtain  estimates  of trends.
These results are probably generalizable to other  parameters that could be
described well by a simple mass balance, such as  conservative  substances,
radionuclides,  some heavy metals and suspended  solids.   Biological para-
meters and certain organic contaminants would require  a more sophisticated
approach (Canale et al.  in press;  Chiu 1978).
                                     68

-------
REFERENCES

Acres Consulting Services - Earth Science Consultants.  1975.  Atmospheric
    Loadings of the Upper Great Lakes.  Phase Two Report.  Canada Centre
    for Inland Waters.

Canale, R.P., L.M. DePalma and W.F. Powers.  In press.  Sampling Strategies
    for Water Quality in the Great Lakes.  EPA Ecological Research Series.
    U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota.  102 pp.

Chapra, S.C.  1979.  Applying Phosphorus Loading Models to Embayments.
    Limnology and Oceanography, 24(1): 163-168.

Chapra, S.C.  In press.  Simulation of Recent and Projected Total Phosphorus
    Trends in Lake Ontario.  J. Great Lakes Research.

Chiu, C. (Ed.).  1978.  Applications of Kalman Filtering to Hydrology,
    Hydraulics, and Water Resources.  Department of Civil Engineering,
    University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.  783 pp.

Delumyea, R. and R.L. Petel.  1979.  Deposition Velocity of Phosphorus-
    Containing Particles Over Southern Lake Huron, April-October, 1975.
    Atmospheric Environment, 13: 287-294.

DePalma, L.M.  1977.  A Class of Measurement Strategy Optimization Problems-
    With an Application to Lake Michigan Surveillance.  Ph.D. Thesis, The
    University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.  122 pp.

DePalma, L.M., R.P. Canale and W.F. Powers.  1979.  A Minimum-Cost Sur-
    veillance Plan for Water Quality Trend Detection in Lake Michigan.  In
    Perspectives on Lake Ecosystem Modeling, eds. D. Scavia and A.
    Robertson, Ann Arbor: Ann Arbor Science,  pp. 223-246.

DiToro, D.M. and W.F. Matystik, Jr.  In press.  Mathematical Models of Water
    Quality in Large Lakes.  Part I:  Lake Huron and Saginaw Bay, Model
    Development, Verification and Simulations.  EPA Ecological Research
    Series.  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, Minnesota.

Dolan, D.M., A.K. Yui and R.D. Geist.  In preparation.  Evaluation of River
    Load Estimation Methods for Total Phosphorus.  U.S. Environmental Pro-
    tection Agency, Large Lakes Research Station, Grosse lie, Michigan.

Dolan, D.M., R.D. Geist and K. Salisbury.  In preparation.  Applications of
    a Dynamic Mass Balance to Water Quality Problems in the Great Lakes.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Large Lakes Research Station,
    Grosse lie, Michigan.

Kabel, R.L.  1975.  Atmospheric Impact on Nutrient Budgets.  In:  Pro-
    ceedings of the First Specialty Symposium on Atmospheric Contribution
    to the Chemistry of Lake Waters.  Internat.'Assoc. Great Lakes Res.
    pp. 114-126.


                                     69

-------
Kalman, R.'E.  1960.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and  Prediction  Pro-
    blems.  Trans. ASMF, J. Basic Engr.  828: 34-35.

Kalman, R.E. and R. Bucy.  1961.  New Results in Linear Filtering  and Pre-
    diction Theory.  Trans. ASMF, J. Basic Engr.  83D: 95-108.

Murphy, T.J. and P.V. Doskey.  1975.  Inputs of Phosphorus from Precipita-
    tion to Lake Michigan.  EPA-600/3-75-005, U.S. Environmental Protection
    Agency, Duluth, Minnesota.  27 pp.

Murphy, T.J.  1975.  Concentrations of Phosphorus in Precipitation in the
    Lake Michigan Basin.  In: Proceedings of the First Specialty Symposium
    on Atmospheric Contribution to the Chemistry of Lake Waters, Internat.
    Assoc. Great Lakes Res.  pp. 127-131.

Quinn, F.H.  1977.  Annual and Seasonal Flow Variations through the Straits
    of Mackinac.  Water Resources Research, 13:  137-144.

Sydor, M.  Particle Transport in Duluth-Superior Harbor.   EPA Ecological
    Research Series.  U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency, Duluth,
    Minnesota.

Upper Lakes Reference Group.   1977.  The  Waters  of Lake Huron and Lake
    Superior, V. 2.  International  Joint  Commission,  Windsor, Ontario.
    743 pp.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.  1975.  Lake Erie  Wastewater Management Study
    Preliminary Feasibility Report.  Buffalo District Army.  Corps of
    Engineers,  Buffalo, New York.

Verhoff, F.H.,  S.M. Yaksich and D.A. Melfi.  In  press.   Estimation of
    Nutrient Transport in Rivers.  J.  Environmental  Eng.  Div. Amer. Soc.
    Civil Engr.
                                    70

-------
                                 SECTION  5

        A MODEL APPROACH TO ESTIMATING THE EFFECTS OF ANTHROPOGENIC
                 INFLUENCES ON THE ECOSYSTEM OF  LAKE BAIKAL

          A.B. Gorstko1, Yu.A. Dombrovskiy"1, V.V. Selyutin1,
           F.A. Surkovl, A.M. Nikanorov2  and A.A. Matveev2
    Lake Baikal  is located  in the southern portion of eastern Siberia
between 51°29' and 55°46'N  (Figure  1).  Ranking eighth  in  area  and first  in
depth among all  continental bodies  of water of the planet,  it contains about
20 percent of the world reserves of fresh surface water.   The basic morpho-
metric characteristics of the lake  are presented in Table  1.

           TABLE 1.  MORPHOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF LAKE  BAIKAL
  Number
Characteristic
Value
    1


    2
Length
     a) of lake
     b) of shoreline
Width
     a) mean
     b) maximum
     c) minimum
Area
 636 km
2000 km

  48 km
  79 km
  26 km
a) total
b) of zone less than 50 m deep
c) of zone less than 250 m deep
4 Depth
a) mean
b) maximum
5 Volume
6 Altitude Above Sea Level
7 Area of Watershed Basin
31.5 103-km2
2.5 103-km2
6 103-km2
730 m
1620 m
23.6 103-km3
456 m
557 103'km2
1 Institute for Mechanics and Applied Mathematics, Rostov State University,
 192/2 Stachky Prospect, 344090 Rostov-on-Don, USSR.

2Hydrochemical Institute, 192/3 Stachky Prospect, 344090 Rostov-on-Don,
 USSR.
                                    71

-------
        50s
       102°
                  104°
                                106°
                                                            110°
Figure 1.  Diagram of  surface currents in Baikal  during the ice-free  season.
                                       72

-------
    The annual surface runoff  into  the  lake  is  about  59  km^,  of which  one-
half is provided by the Selenga River,  while  the  annual  outflow of  the
Angara River is 61 km^.

    The most important characteristic of  Lake Baikal  is  the exceptionally
high quality of its water.   It is distinguished by  its  low mineral  content
(many ions in concentrations of less than  100 mg/liter),  high  transparency
(Secchi depth measurements of  up to 40  m), an abundance  of dissolved oxygen
(at least 9.5 mg/£, even at  depths  of 1300-1400 m), and  low temperature
(mean annual surface temperature 4.5°C).

    Given these conditions,  a  unique ecologic system  exists in  the  lake,  the
most important peculiarity of which is  the existence  of  an endemic  complex
of aquatic organisms populating the open  regions  of Baikal.   The  richness
and variety of the flora and fauna  of the  lake, numbering 2400  species and
subspecies, of which approximately  three-fourths  are  endemic  species;  the
extensive branching of the trophic  chain,  ending  in the  Baikal  seal; and  the
nature and scale of the dynamic processes  in  the  water enable  Baikal to be
considered as a world ocean  in minature.   A  large quantity of  information  on
Baikal has been systematized (Kozhov 1972),  and the results of  later studies
can be found in the works of the Limnologic  Institute, Siberian  Branch,
Acad. Sci. USSR (1977, 1978).

    While it represents tremendous  ecologic  and scientific value, Lake
Baikal is also an important  national economic resource.  The  economic  util-
ization of Baikal consists of three basic  uses:

    a)  water consumption,
    b)  culture and harvesting of fish, and
    c)  recreational uses.

    The floating of timber and the  construction of  large  industrial enter-
prises which might act as sources of pollution are forbidden  in the imme-
diate vicinity of the lake,  and navigation is limited.   However,  it is im-
possible to completely eliminate the entry of various impurities  into the
lake.  The most important sources are surface runoff  and atmospheric preci-
pitation.  Preliminary analysis shows that currently  it  is difficult to see
any evidence of changes in the ecosystem  of  the lake  as  a result  of human
activity.  On the one hand,  this is a result  of timely preventive measures
taken as a result of the resolution of  the Central Committee  and  USSR
Council of Ministers of 16 June 1971, in  which it was stated  that lake pro-
tection should contain, "additional measures  to assure rational  utilization
and conservation of the natural riches  in  the basin of Lake Baikal"; while
on the other hand, it also results  from the  great self-purifying  capacity  of
the lake.  Thus, it is of great importance to obtain  well-founded long-term
predictions concerning the possibility  of  future  effects of human activity.
The model approach to the prediction of the  status of this ecosystem is in-
tended to provide the most objective estimate of  such effects  in  the Baikal
region and provide an effective solution  to the problem  of its  preservation
and efficient use.  This paper considers  some trends  in  the realization of
the model approach.


                                     73

-------
LAKE DYNAMICS

    Information on currents in the  lake at various  periods  of time,  repre-
sented in the form of a field of velocities or flows  between  various volume
elements of the lake, is necessary for modeling of  the  hydrochemical regime
and the dynamics of the plankton population.  There are two possibilities in
this case:  1) to perform numerical hydrodynamic calculations,  or  2) to use
the data from natural observations of speeds and directions of  currents.
Both methods were used in the present work.

    The starting point used was a diagram of convective-gradient currents
(Figure 1) obtained by processing observed data on water  temperature by the
dynamic method (Krotova 1970).  The surface of the  lake was divided  into  14
regions (Figure 2), and 4 depth layers were distinguished:  0-25 m,  25-50 m,
50-250 m and 250 m to the bottom.  The extensive material obtained in field
observations, summarized in the collective monograph  Techeniya  v Baikale
(Currents in Baikal) (1977), allowed an estimation of movements through the
boundary regions selected for various seasons of the  year.

    In addition, a UNIVAC 1100/40 computer, utilizing a program developed by
J. Paul, was used to calculate the velocity fields corresponding to  various
wind situations.  These calculations yielded results  similar  to those ob-
tained by means of a baroclinic model (Tsvetova 1977).


WATER QUALITY

    The basis of the models for the dynamics of the concentrations of sub-
stances entering the lake is the equation of turbulent  diffusion of  a non-
conservative impurity:


    |£ = div (D grad c) + v grad c - kc + f                              (1)


    grad c/S = 0                                                         (2)

    where:  c(t; x, y, z) is the concentration of the substance;
            D(t; z) is the coefficient of turbulent diffusion;
            v(t; x, y, z) is the velocity vector;
            k(t) is the decay rate;
            f(t; x, y, z) is the loading of the substance into the
             lake;
            S(x, y, z) is the boundary surface.

    In the calculations,  Equation (1) was replaced by a finite-difference
system corresponding to the regionalization used in the model.  The  time-
series plots  of concentrations of an arbitrary substance  in the various
regions of the  lake are shown in Figure 2.  The basic sources are assumed
to be  the  Selenga River (Region 4), and the Baikal Cellulose-Paper Combine
(BCPC,  Region  2).
                                     74

-------
< cr
El
       40
       30
 o
 o
       20
       10
                             4
           \  \ \\ \ II 1 1 1 Ml
z
o
5

-------
    The concentration fields in the vicinities of  "local"  pollution sources
were calculated with a significantly smaller grid  (0.5  km  horizontally;
0.02 km in depth), again using Equation  (1).  Concentration  of an  arbitrary
substance in the upper (0-20 m) layer near the BCPC  is  shown in Figure 3.
Data on flow velocities were taken from  field observations.   Measurements
of velocities during 1977 were conducted by V.M. Sleptsova of the  Baikal
Weather Observatory, using an especially detailed  plan  of  observations in-
corporating the requirements of the mathematical model.  The experiments
showed that the propagation of a patch of material in the  lake depends es-
sentially on the velocity field, and changes significantly from season to
season.  At the same time, concentrations were found to  be relatively insen-
sitive to variations in diffusion coefficients.  The mean  area of  calculated
patch of material was small, 4-5 km^.


BIOTIC CYCLE

    The biotic cycle, i.e., the chain of transformation  of living  and dead
organic matter, binds together all of the biologic,  biochemical, physical
and other processes occurring in the ecosystem.  The most  important index of
the biotic cycle is the biotic balance, reflecting the  relationship between
the system of productive and destructive processes at all  trophic  levels.
The mean annual biotic balance of Baikal, calculated on  the  basis  of results
of studies of the Limnologic Institute, Siberian Branch, USSR Acad.  Sci.,
for 1964-1970, is presented in Table 2.

    However, the practical usefulness of this balance is limited,  due to its
static nature.  For completeness, nonliving organic matter,  which  acts as a
nutrient medium for bacteria, and nutrients limiting primary production
should also be included.

    The pelagic ecosystem of the lake, encompassing 80  percent  of  its area,
occupies the most important position in the cycle of organic  matter in
Baikal.  A simplified plan of the cycle of matter and energy in the pelagic
zone is presented in Figure 4.

    Differentiation of dissolved organic matter (DOM) into easily  oxidizable
(OOM) and non-oxidizable aquatic humus (IOM) is necessary  to  provide an ac-
curate estimate of the bacterial production.  This differentiation  was per-
formed arbitrarily, based on the relationships of permanganate  and  bichro-
mate oxidizability, and the ratio of organic carbon  (C0rg) to organic nitro-
gen (N0rg).  In particular, analysis of the vertical  distribution  of X =
Corq/Norq,  reflecting the relative increase in the fraction  of  aquatic humus
in the DOM with depth, showed that for the complex of matter  forming the
IOM,  X = 5 can be assumed, while for the IOM9 X = 22.  Then  the fraction of
Corg represented by IOM (xc) can be calculated by the equation:
x
     c
       = 1-38 (1 -  ) .                                                   (3)
    The ratio of mineral nitrogen to mineral phosphorus in the waters  of
Baikal lies between 7 and 10 (Votintsev et al_. 1975), approximately corre-

                                     76

-------
 E
^



i   4

LJJ
5   2
0.005
                                  1
             1
I
                                  4567


                                DISCHARGE (x), km
                          8
                   10
     Figure 3.  Concentration field (mg/liter) of a pollutant in the 0-20 m layer near BCPC.

                            D = 104 cm2/s; K - 0.086 day-1.

-------
      TABLE 2.   BIOTIC BALANCE OF THE PELAGIC ECOSYSTEM OF  LAKE  BAIKAL
                kcal/m2/year (from Botintsev et^ al_. 1975)

Component           B      P      P/B      K      T      T/B       A      R~

Phytoplankton      3.0    875     290     0.9     97      32      972

Bacterioplankton   9.4    315      34     0.5    262      28      602     602

Epischura
  (Epischura
   baicalensis)    6.0   80.5    13.5     0.25   245      41      326     407

Cyclops
  (Cyclops
   colensis)       0.3    3.4    11.3     0.27   9.2    30.6     12.6    15.7

Macrohectopus
  (Macrohectopus
   branizkii)3.1    4.7     1.5     0.26  13.3     4.3     18.0    22.5

Omul
  (Coregonus
   autumnolis
   migration)'      1.9    0.38    0.2     0.33   0.76    0.4      1.14    1.4

Large and Small
Gblomyanka
  (Comephorus
   baicalensis
   comephorus
   dybowskii       3.69   2.95    0.8     0.45   3.52    0.9      6.47    8.1

Bullhead sac-fry
and finger lings
  (Cottocomephorus
   grewingki cotto-
   comephorus
   inermis)0.23   0.23    1.0     0.21   0.84    3.7      1.07    1.34

Nerpa (seals)
  (phpca
   sybirica)       1.26   0.22    0.18    0.17   1.08    0.8      1.30    1.6


  B = biomass                       T = destruction (loss to metabolism)
  A = assimilation of food          R = ration
  P = production                    A = 0.8 R; P = A - T; K£ = P/A
                                     78

-------
                        VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL WATER EXCHANGE
Figure 4.  Diagram of cycle of matter and energy in pelagic Lake Baikal.
SOM = suspended organic matter (PM), detritus; OOM - oxidizable fraction
 of dissolved OM; IOM = nonoxidizable fraction of dissolved OM, aquatic
 humus,  a) Direction of solid lines coincide with direction of flow of
 matter and energy; b) Oriented dotted lines symbolize participation of
                 initial component in process indicated.
                                    79

-------
 sponding  to  their  proportions  upon  photosynthesis.   However, the more rapid
 regeneration of  phosphorus,  relative  to  nitrogen,  causes  a decrease in this
 ratio,  frequently  dropping to  0,  during  periods  of maximum development of
 phytoplankton.   Since  nitrite  and ammonia  nitrogen  are  practically absent in
 the  waters of Baikal  (Votintsev  1961), the limiting biogenic element, com-
 pleting the  biotic cycle,  is nitrate  nitrogen.

     To  estimate  the changes  in the  status  of  the  lake's ecosystem consider-
 ing  the excess input of  biogenic  substances and  other  impurities, and an-
 thropogenic  action, distinct from natural  background fluctuations, one can
 use  a model  based  on the dynamic  balance method  (Gorstko  et_ a_L  1977).  The
 algorithm for this method  is presented in  the following section.


 DYNAMIC BALANCE  METHOD

     Two groups of  equations  are  used  to  describe the ecosystem.   The first
 group reflects the productive  nature  of  the system,  i.e.,  the fact that
 matter  in some components  is produced by the  consumption  of others:

     P(T)  = AUHX* + P(T) + U(T)]                                        (4)

     where:   X =  (X], X2,..., Xn)  is the  state vector of the ecosystem,
                 the coordinates of which represent  the  instantaneous
                 values of biomass or  concentration  of the  components;

             P(T) = (PI(T), P2(i),..., PP(T))  is the production vector  of
                    the ecosystem  in period T;

             U(T) =  (UI(T), MT),..., Un(x)) is the control  vector,
                    characterizing the arrival  (or removal)  of  individual
                    components  during period T;

             A(T) =  [a-jj(T)] is the production  matrix of the  ecosystem;

             ajj(T)  is  the fraction of the matter of the jth  component
                    consumed by the ith component in period T.

The superscript t represents discrete time.  The other grouping reflects  the
dynamic nature of the  system.  It is as  follows:
Xt+T= B(T) [X*
                     P(T) + U(T)]
(5)
    where:  B(T) = diag(Bi(T), B2(x) ..... Bn(T)) is a diagonal matrix,
                   and B-J(T) is the fraction of the i   component which
                   remains at the end of period (t, t + T).

The elements of matrices A and B are defined through the rates of mutual
consumption or transformation of components f-j-j (the flux of matter or
energy is directed from the jth component toward the ith component):
                                        80

-------
               £     y
               ^     '
               ke Q
                ke Q.
                    J

    where:   f^j is the rate of decrease of the jtn component as a result
                of consumption by the ktn component;

                is the conversion coefficient between the units of mea-
                surement of the corresponding components;

            QJ is the set of consumers of the jth component.

    If all  components of the model are expressed in units of one chemical
element (for Baikal, as noted, nitrogen can serve as such an element), ob-
viously, the system is balanced:

     N   t._   N   t    N
     E  Xt+T= £  X* +  Z  U. .                                         (8)
    1=1  1     i=l  n   1=1  1

Equation (8) can be easily obtained by adding (4) and (5) term by term and
keeping in  mind that

     N                                                                  , x
     I  a.. + B. = 1,  Vj .                                             (9)
To consider the flow of matter from the lake p0, which depends on internal
processes, the fictitious component XQ is introduced such that f-,-^ = °> vi-
      t+Tn    t
Then XQ      xn + P0 and

     N   t._    N    .     N        N   t     N   t    N
     £  X.   =  E   X|+  £  U. +  E  Xj   = E  r. +  E  U. - pQ .      (10)
    1=0  1     1=0       1=0  n   1=1       1=1      1=1

In particular, we can distinguish two such components in the model of
Baikal, reflecting irrecoverable losses from the lake:  1) the discharge of
organic, mineral substances, and plankton with the waters of the Angara, and
2) the partial sedimentation of QOM onto the deposits on the lake floor.

           N
Since      Z  a.. 0,


                                     81

-------
then equation (4) always has a positive solution (Bellman, 1969):

    P = (I - A)"1 AU1 + U)                                              (11)

    where  I is a unit maxtrix.

    Consequently, this system is noncontradictory.  The basic task of simu-
lation of the ecosystem is reduced to identification of the matrix F =
[fin-] as a function of the values of the state variables, and the environ-
mental factors (illumination, temperature, secondary impurities, etc.), with
subsequent allowance for various input perturbations and control actions.

    Consideration of the three-dimensional structure of the ecosystem in the
model can be achieved by using the same approach in two modifications:

    1.  Combined Model.  This model  involves an increase in the dimension-
ality of the state vectors of production and control, the coordinates of
which are grouped according to the number of spatial units distinguished.
In the same manner, the dimensionality of matrices A and B increase, as they
are converted to block matrices, their elements decreasing due to addition
of the speeds of flow or migration of components between neighboring cells
in the denominator:
             T   S
                      rj
                reQ.
                ( £   fU) Yf,
                 reQj  ^   ^
                       (i)

                          	7TT-    i  = J A k = I

          1 + T ( z  f(4)  y -  +
                 reQ. rJ  ^


          0                                    i 4 j A k = I

where the subscripts i, j, r indicate the numbers of the components,

    k, £, s are the cell numbers;

    g^1) is the rate of outflow (migration) from the kth cell into the
     sk  s^h cell by the i^h component;

    f^'  is the rate of loss of the jth component due to consumption by
         the ith component in  cell k.

                                     82

-------
    This modification allows simultaneous description of the  biotic  cycle
and transfer (migration) of components; however, the increase  (proportional
to the square of the number of cells M) in dimensionality of matrix  A, which
must be repeatedly transformed, places a limit on  its use.

    2.  Method of Splitting.  Sequential operation of two models  is  used:
1) a model of the dynamics of the water (migration of components), and 2)  a
model of the biotic cycle.

    If x|< is that portion of the state vector which relates to cell  k:
       x-j is that portion of the state vector which relates to component i:
       R|< is the model operator of the biotic cycle in cell k:
       Gi is the model operator of water exchange  (migration of the  itn com-
          ponent, then:

       =    (*)              k = 12...M
         = 6. (7.)
                                =  1,2,. ..N
    where:  7 is the intermediate vector;
            M is the number of cells;
            N is the number of components.
CONCLUSION

    At present, anthropogenic
a minimum.  Therefore, we can
adequate models for long-term
rather complete dynamic model
mary function as a predictive
link between various branches
provide mutual testing of the
tion for studies necessary for
support.
                              effects on the ecosystem of Lake Baikal are at
                              judge their possible effects only if we have
                              prediction.  One such possible model is a
                              of the biotic cycle.  In addition to its pri-
                              instrument, this model can act as a connecting
                              of limnologic study of Lake Baikal, helping to
                              materials produced, and indicating the direc-
                               elimination of restrictions in information
REFERENCES

Bellman, R.  1969.  Vvedeniye v teoriy matrits (Introduction to matrix
    theory), Moscow, Nauka Press, 367 pp.

Biologic productivity of the pelagic area of Baikal and its variability.
    1977.  Trudy LIN SO AN SSSR, Vol. 19(39), Novosibirsk, Nauka Press,
    254 pp.

Botintsev, K.K., A.M. Meshcheryakova and G.I. Popovskaya.  1975.  Krugovorot
    organ icheskogo veshchestva v ozere Baikal (The cycle of organic matter
    in Lake Baikal), Novosibirsk, Nauka Press, 189 pp.
                                     83

-------
Botintsev, K.K.  1961.  Gidrokhimiya ozera Baikal (The hydrochemistry of
    Lake Baikal), Moscow, Acad. Sci. USSR Press, 311 pp.

Gorstko, A.B., Yu.A Dombrovskiy and V.V. Selyutin.  1977.  Application of
    the dynamic balance method to modeling of the biotic cycle under condi-
    tions of anthropogenic eutrophication.  Antropogennoye evtrofirovaniye
    prirodnykh vod (Anthropogenic eutrification of natural waters), Part I,
    Chernogolovka, pp. 75-79.

Kozhov, M.M.  1972.  Ocherki  po baykalovedeniyu (Essays on the science of
    Baikal), Irkutsk, Vost.-Cib.  kn. izd-vo press, 254 pp.

Krotova, V.A.  1970.   Geostrophic circulation of the waters of Baikal during
    the period of direct thermal  stratification.  Trudy LIN SO AN SSSR, Vol.
    14(34), pp. 11-44.

Problems of Baikal.  1978. Trudy LIM SO AN SSSR,  Vol.  16(36), Novosibirsk,
    Nauka Press,  295  pp.

Techeniya v Baikal (Currents  in Baikal).  1977.  Novosibirsk, Nauka Press,
    160 pp.

Tsvetova, Ye.A.  1977.  Mathematical modeling of the circulation  of the
    water of a lake.   Ibid.,  pp.  63-81.
                                    84

-------
                                  SECTION  6

         SPECIES DEPENDENT MASS TRANSPORT AND  CHEMICAL  EQUILIBRIA:
                  APPLICATION TO  CHESAPEAKE  BAY  SEDIMENTS
                           Dominic M.  Di Toro^
INTRODUCTION
    The analysis of the  interactions  between  sediments  and  the  interstitial
waters is a problem of substantial difficulty.  The  complex chemical  and
biochemical reactions which  affect the  concentrations of  the substances of
interest are coupled to  each  other and  to the gas  and solid phases  of  the
sediment.  In addition,  fluxes exchange mass  across  the sediment-water
interface and redistribute it within  the sediment  via interstitial  water
diffusion and physical and biological mixing  in the  surface layer.  Clearly
a comprehensive analysis  is  necessary in order to  understand these  interre-
lationships and to establish  the  primary controlling factors.

    The calculation presented below  is  based  on the  mass  balance models of
observed increases or decreases in interstitial water concentrations  of
various substances (Goldberg  and  Koide  1963;  Lerman  and Taniguchi 1972;
Berner 1974).  Typically  these models are applied  to a  single constituent of
interest, e.g., ammonia.  For multiple  constituents  a conceptual simplifica-
tion is available if the  reactions are  being  driven  by  the  decay of organic
matter of a fixed stoichiometry (Richards 1965).   A  further simplification
occurs if it is assumed  that  certain  species  are at  chemical  equilibrium.
For certain inorganic dissolved species and certain  redox reactions this  is
a well known approximation that has  been tested by a number of  investigators
(e.g., Garrells and Christ 1965;  Kramer 1964; Thorstenson 1970).  while it
has often been pointed out that overall and complete thermodynamic  equili-
brium is never attained for  all species in all settings it  is also  clear
that certain reactions occur  so quickly that  they  are virtually in  equili-
brium over the time scale of  the  analysis.  Thus while  not  as universally
applicable as the principle  of mass  balance it is  nonetheless a useful ap-
proximation in certain contexts.  For the calculation of  sediment behavior
presented below, the equations of mass  balance and chemical  equilibrium are
combined into a single structure  for  the analysis  of sediment interstitial
water and gas phase concentrations.
^Environmental and Engineering and Science Program, Manhattan  College,
 Bronx, New York 10471.
                                     85

-------
COMPUTATIONAL FRAMEWORK

    The equations of mass conservation provide the  starting  point for the
analysis of the distribution of dissolved and particulate materials  in sedi-
ments.  For a steady state one dimensional analysis  let  Di be  the diffusion
coefficient porosity product of species A-j and let wi be the corrected
(Imboden 1975) advective velocity of A-J, the velocity induced  by the sedi-
mentation of mass relative to a coordinate system fixed  with respect to the
sediment surface corrected for compaction, and assume they are  constants in
depth.  The one dimension mass transport equations for the Ns  species, A-j,
are:


                     dtA.l
                           = f1 ([A^....,^])      i=l,---,Ns        (1)


where f -j( [A-j],..., [ANsl) is the sum of all sources and sinks for species Ai.
For rapid chemical reactions such as acid-base reactions these  equations are
very difficult to solve using straight-forward numerical methods (DiToro
1976).

    The method developed for this situation depends on separating the fast
and slow reactions and requiring that the fast reactions be at  equilibrium.
Consider the species (the fast reactants) that are involved in  at least one
fast reaction and number them i=l,---,Nfs.  For example HCOs~ would  be in
this category.  The remaining species (the. slow reactants) are  numbered
i=Nfs+l,...,Ns.  Particulate organic matter would be in this latter  cate-
gory.  For this division the mass balance equations can be written:
                                                                         (2)
                                                         •pc   9    9 c     \  /


where the rate at which Ai is produced by fast reaction j  is  vjjRj.  Rj  is
the reaction rate of the jth Of Nfr fast reactions and vji  is the reaction
stoichiometric coefficient.  S-j is the net source of Ai due to the slow  re-
actions.  This separation of the equations simplifies the  solution procedure
since equations (2) for the fast reactants can be transformed into a smaller
set of equations for the Nc components, Bj, that form the fast reactants.
Using the stoichiometric coefficients, aij, of the species  in terms of the
components equation (2) becomes (DiToro 1976):

    Nfs       2                     Nfs

    f=1 (-Di^ + Widl)aik[Ai]^=1  ^        K-1.-.NC         (4)


                                      86
d2[A.]
-^^
d[A.]
lfz~
= Si
Nfr
+ Z V..R.
j=l J1 J

-------
Although the species concentrations,  Aj,  are  nonlinear  functions of the Nc
components B|< via the equilibrium  relationships,  the  equations  (3)  and (4)
can be solved more directly than the  species  equations  themselves.   In terms
of number of equations, for example,  the  twenty-three fast  reactants con-
sidered in the application below would  each require an  equation  in  each seg-
ment whereas seven component equations  in  each  segment  suffice.   The solu-
tion procedure for equation (4) is  detailed in  the Appendix.


CLASSIFICATION OF THE REACTIONS

    The initial choice for an  application  of  these methods  is the species to
be considered and whether they are  fast reactants.  For the calculations
presented below it appeared reasonable  to  restrict the  computations to the
distributions of the species with  components:   carbon,  nitrogen,  sulfur,
hydrogen, oxygen, and, because of  its availability in the data to be ana-
lyzed, argon.  The species and their  relevant properties are  listed in Table
1.

    Consider, first, the species involved  in  purely aqueous reactions.  The
acid-base reactions are clearly rapid and  at  equilibrium over the time scale
of sediment diffusion.  However it  is not  clear that  the redox reactions  are
either as rapid or at chemical equilibria.  The principal aqueous redox re-
actions for the species in Table 1  are  the reduction  of sulfate  and the pro-
duction and consumption of methane.   Since bacterially  mediated  kinetics  are
responsible for these redox reactions,  it  might seem  at first glance that
the notion of chemical equilibrium  is of  little value 1n this context.  How-
ever it has been pointed out that  the thermodynamically predicted sequence
of oxidation-reductions is commonly observed  in nature  as oxidation of or-
ganic material occurs (Stumm 1966)  so that this appears to be a  reasonable
simplification of the complex  reaction  kinetics actually taking  place  if
they are, in fact, rapid.  The assumption  is  also quite convenient  since
equilibrium calculations are independent of the reaction pathways and  no  de-
tailed specification of the kinetics  are necessary; only the thermodynamic
constants of the species of interest  are required.  One of the interesting
results of the application discussed  below is that it appears reasonable  to
assume that the reactions involving sulfate and methane are indeed  rapid,
relative to other reactions and the transport,  and at equilibrium.

    For the redox reactions involving nitrogen, although it may  be  reason-
able to assume they are rapid, the  equilibrium  that is  calculated from ther-
modynamics is unreasonable.  For example, the thermodynamically  favored oxi-
dation of ammonia to nitrogen gas within the  zone of  sulfate reduction does
not appear to occur, nor does the oxidation of  nitrogen gas to nitrate in
oxic environments.  As a consequence the only nitrogen  species considered
in the fast reactant set is gaseous and dissolved N2-   Ammonia is assigned
to the slow reactants; nitrite and  nitrate are  not considered as  their con-
centrations are quite small in the  application  considered below.

    Consider, next, the aqueous-gas phase reactions.  As methane  is produced
it is possible that a gas phase (bubbles) will form.  Whether the gas  phase
is in equilibrium with the interstitial water at  that location depends on

                                     87

-------
     TABLE 1    CHEMICAL  FAST  REACTANTS  STRUCTURE AND AQUEOUS  DIFFUSION
                               COEFFICIENTS
Phase
Aqueous
H+
OH-
H?0
C,
02
C02
HCO;
cor
CH4
N2
H2S
HS"
S=
S07
Ar4
PK(1)

o.o(3)
-14 5
0.0(3)
-89.0
-0.77
-7.07
-17.6
22.18
-2.57
-1.12
-8.36
-22.74
-43.55
-2.23
Relative Diffusion
Coefficient (2)

4.582
2.597
1.0
0.989
0.842
0.583
0.488
0.733
0.984
0.748
0.852
0.406
0.524
0.990
Phase
Gas
HoO
02
CO 2
CH4
N2
H2S
Ar

pH

H+

pS

PK(I)

-1.56
-86.0, .
0.0(3)
24.3] .
0.0(3)
f f\\
0.0 3
/ *N \
0.0(3)



7.42



                                                      H2S
                                       4.6
SLOW REACTANTS

Phase
Relative Diffusion
   Coefficient(2)
         Reaction
   Source(+)  Sink(-)
Aqueous •

  NHj

Organic Sediment

  CH302(NH3)Y
    0.963
    0.0
S = + KY [CH302(NH3)y]
S = - KY[CH602(NH3)y]
 Aqueous phase concentrations  in  mole/£,  Gas  phase concentrations in mole
 fractions.  pK for the reaction  with ths species  concentration on the left
 hand side and the component concentrations on the right hand side, e.g.,
 [HCO^] = 1.0 [C02(g)]  + 1.0 [H20(aq)]  -  1.0  [H+(aq)f.   For T = 15°C and gas
 phase total pressure of 4 atm2.   Aqueous C02 equilibria adjusted for C£ =
 10%.  (Wagman, et al., 1968;  Stumm and Morgan, 1970;  Atkinson and Richards,
 1967; Yamamoto et aT., 1976;  Harvey, 1966; Weiss, 1970).

 Dspecies/DC£~ with DCJT = 2.032  • 10'5cm2/sec @ 25°C  (Robinson and Stokes,
 1959; Himmelblau, 1964; Chapman, 1967; Li and Gregory,  1974: Reid et al.,
 1977).
3
 Indicates a component as well  as a species.   e~ is the  remaining component.

-------
the rapidity of the mass transfer across the  liquid-gas  interface.   For
stationary or slowly moving bubbles, equilibrium  is  obviously reasonable.
For rapid bubble motion with mass transport across the interface,  however,
the assumption is incorrect.  Therefore assigning the aqueous-gas  phase re-
actions to the fast set precludes the analysis of non-equilibrium  mass
transfer within this framework.

    The aqueous-sediment reactions are not mechanistically  included  in  this
calculation.  Rather the reactions controlling pH and pS  are  adjusted such
that the pH and pS are at their observed values.  The relevant  sediment buf-
fering and precipitation reactions are simulated  rather than  explicitly in-
cluded.  In addition, it appears that ammonia adsorption  can  be neglected
based on the magnitudes of the transport and  reaction parameters as  shown
below, although its inclusion would not materially complicate the  calcula-
tion.

    The principal slow aqueous-sediment reaction  considered  is  the decay of
sedimentary organic material.  In fact the rate of this decay and  the diffu-
sion and advective transport set the time scale within which  the other  reac-
tions must be rapid.  The structure of the calculation which  results from
these concentrations is shown in Table 1.

    The aqueous diffusion coefficients are species dependent  as shown and
these differences are included in the calculation.   However,  the coupling of
the diffusion fluxes due to the electrical potential generated  by  the dif-
fering diffusion coefficients appears to have only a small  effect  at sea
water concentrations (Ben-Yaakov 1972) and is neglected although its inclu-
sion presents no real difficulty.


SPECIES INDEPENDENT TRANSPORT

    As can be seen in Table 1, the assumption that aqueous  species diffuse
at the same rate is in error by a factor of two and, if H+  and  OH" are  con-
sidered, by a factor of twenty.  The situation becomes more  implausible if
the gas and stationary phases are considered  to be diffusing  as well.   The
assumption of species independent transport also  requires that  the species
are advecting with the same velocity.  This is reasonable for the  aqueous
and solid phases in the absence of groundwater intrusion, but it is  cer-
tainly possible that the gas phase is advecting at a different  velocity and
in a different direction relative to the aqueous  and solid  phases.

    Nevertheless the solution of the relevant differential  equations are so
simplified by this assumption that it is useful to pursue the result.   For
the decay of sedimentary organic material, with a sedimentation velocity, w,
a first order decay with rate constant, K, and zero  diffusion the  solution
to equation (3) is an exponentially decreasing concentration  of sediment or-
ganic material in depth: c0 exp(-Kz/w), with  surface boundary concentration
c0.  The spatial distribution of the source due to this slow  reaction is:
S£=KCO exp(-Kz/w), where £ is the species index of sediment  organic  matter.
                                      89

-------
    For the case of species-independent transport equations  (4)  each become
an equation in a component since ? a-jiJA-j] =  [Bkl.  The  source  term is just
the quantity of that component   1 being produced by the  decay  of  sediment-
ary organic matter since a^ is its component stoichiometry.  Further the
equations are not coupled to each other and they can be  solved  separately.
The result is:


    [B.](z) = [B.]  + ^SL-(1 - e-Kz/w)             k=l,..-,N          (5)
      K         K °   1+KD/vr

where [B|<]o are the component boundary concentration at  z  =  0,  the  sediment-
water interface.  For components that are not part of the  stoichiometry of
the sedimentary organic matter, i.e., the Bk's such that  a£k =  0, their con-
centrations are constant in depth.

    Perhaps the most useful way of picturing the calculation  implied by
equation (5) is to interpret £ = 1  - exp(-Kz/w) as a variable that  reflects
the extent of a titration of sedimentary organic matter  into  the chemical
system defined by the boundary concentrations of the components.  As depth
increases, £ increases and more sedimentary organic material  is titrated
into the chemical system where it reacts with the boundary-defined  component
composition to produce a new composition of species.  Thus with species-
independent transport, the depth distribution in the sediment is simply the
result of an exponential titration  of organic matter into  the chemical
system defined by the surface boundary composition of the  sediment.

    It is interesting to note that  the chemical equilibrium  investigations
of reducing sediments by Thornstenson (1970) and Gardner  (1973) are  con-
ceived as titrations of organic matter into chemical systems  comprised  of
entirely dissolved species or with  solid phases present.   The above  analysis
indicates that for species-independent transport the depth distribution of
species indeed reflects a simple titration and the results of such  calcula-
tions are directly relevant.

    It is useful to realize that this solution satisfies  the  conditions of
the mass balance equations with species-independent transport coefficients
so that, in fact it is a plausible  solution for situations wherein  that as-
sumption is reasonable.  Conversely for species-dependent  transport  due to
gas phase motions, stationary solid phases, and the differing molecular dif-
fusion coefficients of aqueous species, the requirements  of mass balance are
more complex and the distributions  of components can no  longer  be calculated
from equation (5).


CHESAPEAKE BAY SEDIMENT PARAMETERS

    In order to investigate the feasibility and utility  of these computa-
tions for species dependent transport an initial application  has been made
to observed distributions of carbon, nitrogen, sulfate and dissolved gases
in Chesapeake Bay sediments.  The species chosen (Table  1) are  dictated pri-


                                      90

-------
marily by the available data.  The other major  cations  and  anions  are  not
considered as they were not consistently reported.

    Ideally, the relevant sediment parameters:  the  diffusion  and  advection
coefficients, sedimentary organic matter stoichiometry,  and  its  reaction
rate should be determined together with the observations  of  interstitial
water concentrations.  While this is not the  case for the historical data
considered in this application, a reasonably  complete set of estimates  can
be made from other investigations.  These  are  listed in  Table  2.   The  ratio
of sediment organic carbon to organic nitrogen  is reasonably constant  over
the 30 cm. of interest and both decay exponentially  as  shown in  Figure  1
(Schubel et^ aj_. 1977).  The boundary condition  for sediment organic carbon
ranges between 2 and 3% (Biggs 1967).  The sedimentation  velocity  has  been
determined by Pb210 dating and other methods  and ranges  between  0.1 and 0.28
cm/yr.  It is, therefore, possible to estimate  the first  order decay rate
constant, and knowing the water content and surface  sediment concentrations,
the rates of organic carbon and nitrogen sources resulting from  this slow
reaction.  Essentially a three-fold uncertainty exists  for both  these
sources as shown.  An independent estimate of the chloride diffusion coeffi-
cient is available, based on an analysis of the time variable  chloride  pro-
files in the sediment (Holdren ejb aj_. 1975).

    The parameter values in Table 2 can be used to assess the  importance of
ammonia adsorption and the need to include a  solid phase  ammonia species.
It has been shown (Berner 1977) that if DK/w2»l+K*, where K*  is the linear
adsorption coefficient, K* = tads.NH4]/[NH4(aq)], the adsorption can be ne-
glected in the computation of the interstitial  water ammonia concentration.
For the parameter ranges in Table 2, DK/w^ ranges from  5  to 130.   Although
no ammonia adsorption coefficient is available  for Chesapeake  Bay  sediments,
the value of 1.6 has been reported for a Long  Island Sound sediment (Rosen-
feld and Berner 1976).  Thus it is probable that ammonia  adsorption can be
neglected in this calculation.

    There is only one remaining uncertainty:  the hydrogen  (actually the
electron) stoichiometry of the sediment.  Although it is  conventional  to
assume that Redfield's ratio (Ch^O) applies to  sedimentary organic material
it is possible that other ratios might be appropriate.   For the  components
used in this calculation the required stoichiometry  is


     CHg+2 °2+6(NH3)Y = C02 + 6H+ + 3e~ + YNH3  + 6H2°

It is intersting to note that the oxygen stoichiometry  is essentially  irrel-
evant once the carbon and hydrogen stoichiometry are established since  it is
related to the H20 content of the organic matter.  The  quantity  of H20  in-
troduced by the organic material decay is negligible relative  to the concen-
tration present and the convenient choice is  6  = 0 corresponding to the
"dry" stoichiometry of the organic material,  i.e., ((X^jHgCNHsJy.  Any  addi-
tional water added to this material does not  alter the  results and is  there-
fore irrelevant for this computation.  For this convention the Redfield
stoichiometry is CH/^ corresponding to the electron to  carbon stoichiomet-
ric ratio of glucose.

                                     91

-------
                                   TABLE  2.   CHESAPEAKE  BAY SEDIMENT PARAMETERS
ro
Description
Ratio of Sediment
Org C to Org N
Sediment Org C at
z = 0
Sedimentation
Velocity
Sediment First Order
Decay Coefficient
Water Content
Organic Carbon
Chloride Diffusion
Coefficient
Sediment Sulfide
Concentration
Gas Phase Volume
Symbol
[Org C]
[Org N]
[Org do
w
K
P
Oro-C* '
DQ£~
FeS(s)
FeS(s)
vgas
Value
10.9 + 1.1
2.7
2.0 - 3.0
0.09 - 0.12
0.1
0.28
0.005 - 0.0067
0.5 - 0.6
15.2 - 45.9
0.22 - 0.44
1.0 - 1.3
0.7 - 0.8
0.1 - 1.0
Units
mole/mole
% dry wt.
% dry wt.
cm/yr
cm/yr
cm/yr
yr-l
% wet wt.
yM/Vday
p
cm /day
% dry wt.
% dry wt.
% volume
Stationl
842D
842D
820
842D
842D
820
-
856C
61
61
Pier 22
Pier 31
Reference
Schubel et al. (1977)
Schubel et al . (1977)
Biggs (1"9"6"7T~
Schubel et al . (1977)
Carpenter (T975)
Powers (1954)
Figure (1)
Biggs (1967)
2
Computed
Holdren et _aj_. (1975)
Biggs (1963)
Biggs (1963)
Schubel (1974)
Schubel (1974)
     See Bricker et a\_.  (1977)  for  the  relationship to latitude and longitude.
     -S0rg_c(0) = K[0rg C]0(l-p)/p.

-------
CO
                                        SEDIMENT COMPOSITION, percent dry wt

                                0.1          0.2     0.3      0.5          1.0
       Figure 1.  The vertical distribution of sediment organic carbon and nitrogen as percent dry weight.
           Chesapeake Bay Station 842D (Schubel et al_., 1977).  The solid lines represent exponential
              decays:  exp (-Kz/w), with w/K = 18 cm and a molar carbon to nitrogen ratio of 10.9.

-------
    A few representative examples for other sediments  and  their organic
fractions are shown in Table 3.  The electron to carbon  ratio,  3,  which is
computed from the reported elemental analysis (C,H,0,N)  after  conversion to
dry stoichiometry, ranges from 3.8 for fulvic acids to 5.3 for  bitumen from
recent Bering Sea sediment.  Thus the fraction of the  sediment  organic car-
bon that is decaying is likely to have an electron to  carbon ratio in  the
lower end of this range since the resistant fractions  (bitumen  and kerogen)
have the higher stoichiometries and the initially deposited material  is pro-
bably close to the Redfield ratio of 4.0.  The nitrogen  to carbon  ratio is
also listed which, except for bitumen, spans a range from  0.05  to  0.1.


CHESAPEAKE BAY STATION 856:  CARBON AND AMMONIA

    The parameter values in Table 2 set the probable ranges for Chesapeake
Bay sediments.  For an application to any particular set of data it  is
likely that the specific values for the parameters will  differ  somewhat,
however the ranges are known.

    An extensive set of interstitial water chemistry data  for Chesapeake
Bay sediments is available (Bricker et aj_. 1977) that  can  be analyzed  within
the context presented above.  A composite data set has been examined from
the winter of 1971-1972.  All stations with the designation 856, that  is  at
the latitude 38°56' and for which measurements of pH,  $04,  alkalinity,  and
NH4 are available simultaneously, have been grouped.  The  average  and  stand-
ard deviation of both the midpoint sampling depth and the  concentrations
have been calculated for the overlying water, and for the  midpoint depth  in-
tervals: 0-5 cm., 5-10 cm., 10-25 cm., 45-85 cm., and 85-100 cm.   In the
plots that follow the data are represented by the means  +;  the standard  de-
viation of both the concentration and the midpoint sampling depths.  If no
error bars appear they are smaller than the plotting symbol.  The  depth in-
tervals are chosen to minimize the overlap between the actual sampling  in-
tervals used in the surveys.  The total carbon dioxide concentration is cal-
culated from the reported pH and alkalinity data with the  equilibrium  con-
stants adjusted for the reported chloride concentration  (Stumm  and Morgan
1970).

    The boundary condition concentrations are established  from  the overlying
water data except for the initial ammonia concentration  which  is chosen to
reproduce the total carbon dioxide to ammonia ratio at 5 cm.  This refine-
ment affects only the computed carbon to ammonia ratio at  the sediment-water
interface and is made in order to better reflect the initial ammonia concen-
tration just below the interface.  These concentrations  are listed in  Table
4 together with the parameters chosen for the transport  and sediment organic
matter stoichiometry.  The diffusion, advection, and reaction rate coeffi-
cients are those reported (Table 2).  The sediment organic carbon  decay rate
and the electron and nitrogen to carbon ratios are adjusted within the re-
ported range to produce an acceptable fit.  The resulting  parameters are
listed in Table 4.  The organic carbon decay rate is at  lower  limit  of the
probable range as is the chloride diffusion coefficient.   Since only the
ratio of these parameters affects the computed profiles  the values chosen
appear to be quite reasonable.  The electron to carbon ratio of 3.33  is sub-

                                      94

-------
          TABLE 3.  SEDIMENT ELECTRON1 AND  NITROGEN  STOICHIOMETRY
                                CH602(NH3)
                     Y
                                          Y
                                         Reference
Fulvic Acid

Humic Acid

Marine Sediment

Marine Sediment

Lithified Marine
  Sediment

Kerogen

Bitumen
3.80 + 0.36   0.0912 + 0.0247

4.24 + 0.19   0.0766 + 0.0129


4.04 - 4.23   0.089 - 0.091

   4.64           0.098



   4.99           0.054


   4.64           0.062


5.29 - 5.33   0.01 - 0.012
Rashid & King (1970)

Rashid & King (1970)

Kemp (1973)

Trask (1938)



Trask (1938)

Philip & Calvin (1976)

Bordovskiy (1965)
   - A + IM1   o [0]   o [N]
         [C]   MCI " J [C]
                                      95

-------
                   TABLE  4.   STATION  SEDIMENT PARAMETERS
Station
Parameter
Sampling Dates
Y"1 = [Org Cl/tOrg Nl
3 - [Org H]/[Org Cl
K
w
S0rq_c(0)
DCJT
[NH4]o
[ZC02]o
[A£k]0
[N2]o
pH
pS
Units
-
mole/mole
mole/mole
yr
cm/yr
yM/£/day
cm^/day
mgN/£
mgC/£
g CaCo3/£
mgN/£
-
-
856
1 Oct 71 to
31 Jan. 73
9.0
3.33
0.005
0.1
13.5^)
0.25^
!.55<4>
21.2(2)
0.073(2)
-
7.4
12.5
858-C
22-XI-66,
5- 1-67
10.6
2.67 - 3.0
0.005
0.1
30.0
0.25
—
18.4(2)
-
7.0(5)
7.4
12.5
 Any value in  the  ranges  in  Table  2 will  produce  the  same result so long as
 S0rg_c(0)/DCjr  =  13.5/0,25  -  27.0/0,50.

"Average  of overlying water  data.

 Computed from reported C£ concentration  10.4°/00.
^
_Estimated from  C/NHs-N ratio  at 5 cm.  Overlying water cone.  = 0.3 mgNA-

^Estimated from  0-15 cm data.
                                    96

-------
stantially lower than what would be expected  (Table  3).   Evidently the  re-
ductions of iron and manganese, which are not considered  in  this  calcula-
tion, are responsible for this difference.  Those  reactions  are  presumably
utilizing the electrons corresponding to the difference between  3 = 3.33
required for sulfate reduction and methane production  and  the  expected
ratio of 3 '^ 4.

    Figure (2) presents the comparisons to the observed ammonia  and total
inorganic carbon data as well as their ratio.  Solutions  for both the
species dependent and the species, independent diffusion coefficients cases
are presented with the latter using the diffusion  coefficient  of  chloride
ion for all species.  No gas phase is computed to  form in  either  case so
that its transport coefficients are not involved.  For both  cases the am-
monia profile is essentially the same since the  ammonia diffusion coeffi-
cient is almost equal to that for chloride, but  not  for the  total  carbon
dioxide profile due to the substantially smaller bicarbonate diffusion  co-
efficient.

    The effect of species dependent diffusion is most  markedly apparent in
the computed total carbon dioxide to ammonia ratio as  shown  in Figure (2).
The sediment organic matter carbon to nitrogen molar ratio is  estimated to
be 9.0 whereas the interstitial water molar ratio  is observed  to  be 16.0
near the sediment water interface and decreases  to 12.5 at 100 cm.   The
species independent case calculation begins at the specified molar  ratio of
the boundary conditions and rapidly declines to  the  sediment organic matter
ratio.  The behavior of the species dependent calculation  is more complex.
The molar ratio declines to a plateau of 14.4 until  a  depth  of 30 cm. after
which it abruptly declines to 13.5 at 40 cm. and further  decreases  to 12.5
at 100 cm.

    The initial plateau value can be understood  in terms  of  the  differing
diffusion coefficients.  The ammonia profile follows equation  (5)  since it
is a conservative slow reactant.  Until the onset  of methane production,
total carbon dioxide can also be described by a  similar equation  with a dif
fusion coefficient adjusted for the fraction of  total  C02  that is COz(aq),
M0%; HCOs, ^90%; and COs (negligible).  The boundary  concentrations are
quickly overwhelmed by the source due to the sediment  decay  and  the ratio
approaches:
              rnrn rl
              LOrg CJ
     [NH4]


Since the total C02 diffusion coefficient  is substantially  smaller  than  the
ammonia diffusion coefficient, and for the transport  and  reaction parameters
for this station:  DNh^K/w2 = 44, the observed  interstitial water ratio  is
larger than the sediment organic matter ratio by the  factor:   DNH4/DZC02 =
1.6.  The importance of this species dependent  transport  effect  for
ammonia, sulfate, and phosphorus concentrations has been  pointed out
(Berner 1977).

                                       97

-------
    CHESAPEAKE BAY STATION 856
500
_ 400
CO
E. 300
O
£ 200
100
75
-»c
CARBON/NITROGEN, g/g NITROGEN, mg/l
« o £ 8 ^ OK § S
TOTAL CARBON DIOXIDE (aq)
, 1 J
- iScL-L
- /'"
r
O4 | | | | |
10 30 50 70 90
DEPTH, cm
AMMONIA
(b)
- ^r^~\
j? \ i i i i
10 30 50 70 90
DEPTH, cm
OTAL CARBON DIOXIDE (aq)/ AMMONIA NITROGEN
(0
" r"-*Li i i -
- v. T r
_ 	 1 1 1 1 1
10 30 50 70 90
DEPTH rm
to
o
•i — "O
-P C CU i—
i. tO to i—
CU  C 0 -P CU
CU .£= C -C •
< — s CD -P 4-* CU +-> IO
t/> o s- T- E c
CU S- O S ••- 4- O
C -P Q. TJ O «r-
r^ C C CU M C O
	 (0 C O CU
fO S- -i- CU -i- to
T3 -r- -P i— to -P
CU C CU (O -P
-P O -P T3 J= 'r- C
3 E c cu -p ;> cu
Q. E cu -c  1- T3 -i—
O C rB 0 T3
O to O) T3 4- "O CO
3 o. — S- in
13 O CU E fO
c~ cU "O CU O "O "O
(O 3 l/> T- C CU
o~ to ro to i —
-— ^ 03 O) O CU -P O.
in -i- -O 10 E
^- -— • O -P -i- to
O -Q CU S- S- O) to
JQ- — O- O O -C
E f> D.I— -P CU
to CU CU C O + I-P
~~" -r- -P S- f~ C 4-
"0 X -P O 10 O
CU O -C 4- CU
> .,- -i_> .(-> E to
s- -o o c cu -c:
CU JO CU 3 CU -P
WC T3 i— J= 0.
X> O S- C (O -P CU
O -O O CU > T3
S- 4- Q. -P
 -» N)
o in o
MOLE C/ MOLE N
gure 2. Chesapeake Bay Station 8!
distribution of (a) total aqueous
(c) their ratio. The computat
(solid line), and the species •
diffusion coefficients set at
(Table 2). The symbols repr<
observations and the rnidpo'
SPECIES DEPENDENT	SPECIES INDEPENDENT
TRANSPORT             TRANSPORT
                          98

-------
    The further decline of the total C02  to  ammonia  ratio  after  a depth of
30 cm is due to the onset of methane production.   Since  a  fraction of  sedi-
ment carbon is now being reduced to methane,  the  production  of total C02 de-
clines somewhat while the production of ammonia continues.   Thus  the ratio
is calculated to decline as do the observations.
SULFATE, ALKALINITY, AND NET ALKALINITY

    The increase of alkalinity  and the decrease  of  sulfate  are  major  fea-
tures of the interstitial water  chemistry of  sediments.   The  computed alka-
linity and sulfate profiles are  compared to observations  in Figure  3a and
3b.  With all aqueous diffusion  coefficients  set  to that  of chloride
(species independent transport),  a twofold  increase in the  sulfate  diffusing
in and the bicarbonate diffusing  out  reduces  the  alkalinity and increases
the sulfate profiles as shown.   If all aqueous diffusion  coefficients are
set at the value for sulfate, the computed profiles are close to the  species
dependent case.

    The accumulated precipitated  sulfide in the  pS  phase  provides a check  of
the calculation.  The estimated  quantity present  in certain Chesapeake  Bay
sediments is on the order of 0.07 - 0.23 mol/1 (Table 2)  in comparison  to
the calculated range of 0.08 -  0.37 mol/1 for station 856 sediments.  As
pointed out by Berner (1974), this provides support for the values  of the
sedimentation velocity used in  the calculation.

    The relationship between alkalinity, sulfate, ammonia,  and  the  other
major cations in anoxic sediments has been investigated (Berner ejt  efL  1970)
and applied to Chesapeake Bay interstitial waters for which the relevant
data were available (Bray 1973).  The idea  is to  balance  the  charges  of the
protolytic and nonprotolytic ions (Ben-Yaakov 1973).  This  charge balance
equation must be satisfied.  The  equivalent sum  of the protolytic ions  is
very nearly titration alkalinity  (corrections for uncharged ions that con-
sume acidity should be made, e.g., NH3(aq) which  is normally  small  at the
pH of interstitial water).  As  a  consequence, the behavior  of alkalinity can
be deduced from the behavior of the nonprotolytic ions in the charge  balance
equation.

    Following this reasoning the  alkalinity is given by the relationship:

    [Alk] = [HCOg] + 2[C03] + [HS~] + 2[S=] +  [OH"] - [H+]
            rri_, ,Alk  . 9 S04   NH4     Ca   ? Mg       ,                (R]
          = [Cl ] [- + 2  r- -  e- - 2    - 2    -  ...I                (8)
                 ] +  [NH + ] + 2[Ca++] + 2[Mg++] +  ...

where the ratios:  Alk/Cl, S04/C1 etc. are the sea water ratios,  and  the
term multipled by [Cl~] expresses the contribution of the original  sea
water.   The remaining terms account for the effects of the  interstitial

                                     99

-------
             CHESAPEAKE BAY STATION 856

                      AKALINITY
    0.0
     1.5




  ~5>  1.0
  LJJ
  I-
  <
              10
                     30     50     70

                        DEPTH, cm

                         SULFATE
    0.5
  CO
    0.0
                            JL

                                           -Q.
             10      30     50    70
                        DEPTH, cm

                     NET ALKALINITY
                                          90
I
Z^

 I
o
to
     30
      25
^   20
              10     30     50     70
                        DEPTH, cm
                                          90
                                                                     0) •!-
                                                                      ' 
                                                            cn 1/1
        - SPECIES DEPENDENT
         TRANSPORT
                              	SPECIES INDEPENDENT
                                  TRANSPORT
                                      100

-------
water and sediment reactions on the major cations  and  anions.   Note  that  if
all the cations and anions were included in this formula  as  implied  by the
dots in the equation, then the sea water term would be zero  (it  is electri-
cally neutral) and the only relevant terms are the sediment  interstitial
water concentrations themselves.  Since the major  variations occur for sul-
fate and ammonia, consider a quantity which might  be termed  net  alkalinity:

     [Net Alkl =  [Alk] + 2[SO|] -  [NH+1 = 2[Ca++] + 2[Mg++] +  ...         (9)

which is the equivalent sum of the sediment-derived cations  and  anions due
to precipitations, dissolutions,  and cation exchanges.  Strictly  speaking,
the definition of net alkalinity  should include nitrite and  nitrate  concen-
trations since their reduction to nitrogen gas increases  alkalinity.   How-
ever in anoxic marine sediments their effects are  usually small  relative  to
other cations and anions.  Net alkalinity should be more  sensitive to
changes in solid phase-interstitial water reactions since the masking  ef-
fects of the large sulfate and ammonia changes have been  removed.  In  fact
net alkalinity is clearly independent of the aqueous reactions  associated
with the decay of sediment organic matter (unlike  alkalinity itself) and  re-
sponds only to solid phase interactions and, as shown  subsequently,  species
dependent transport effects.

    It is clear from this discussion that the calculation of alkalinity,  and
certainly net alkalinity, requires a knowledge of the  behavior  of the  sedi-
ment solid phases and the major cations.  It is possible  to  simulate their
behavior by introducing two artificial phases, called  the pH and  pS  phases
in Table 1, which keep the aqueous concentration of H+ and S~ at  specified
values.  The pH phase behavior is analogous to a reservoir of available
strong acid or base which is titrated into the aqueous phase as  required.

    The operation of the pS phase is based on the  precipitation  of ferrous
sulfides (Berner 1970).  The net  effect of this reaction  on  the  species con-
sidered in this calculation is to remove H2S (Ben-Yaakov  1973)  to the  extent
determined by the activity of S=.

    The computed net alkalinity,  (Figure 3c) is quite  interesting.   For
species dependent transport the net alkalinity first decreases  and then in-
creases, as do the observations.  The species independent cases  also show
decreases and then increases.  Therefore both the  species dependent  trans-
port and simulated solid phase interactions are responsible  for  the  shape
of the net alkalinity profile.

    In order to understand the solid phase role consider  the species inde-
pendent case.  The sources and sinks that affect net alkalinity  must come
from the solid phase-aqueous phase interactions.   The  production  of  carbon
dioxide by the sediment organic matter oxidation does  not influence  alka-
linity since it is uncharged.  The same is true for the removal  of H2S.
However both reactions affect pH.  Therefore with  the  pH  phase  present the
removal of H2S tends to increase  the pH and the pH phase  responds by re-
moving alkalinity.  This is the cause of the initial drop in net  alkalinity.
Once sulfate reduction is over the pH tends to drop as CO^ production  con-


                                     101

-------
tinues.  The pH phase responds by adding  alkalinity.   This is the cause of
the rise in net alkalinity after a depth  of  30  cm.

    For the species independent case with  all species  at the smaller sulfate
diffusion coefficient these variations  in  net alkalinity are intensified
since more C02 and H2S are retained within the  sediment, relative to the
species independent case with all species  at the  chloride diffusion coeffi-
cient.  Of course these changes are occurring in  the  alkalinity profile it-
self but they are masked by the large increase  due  to  sulfate reduction.
The net alkalinity response is much more  sensitive  to  these variations.

    A more detailed investigation of the  behavior of  net alkalinity is given
in Figure 4.  The first case (Figure 4a)  considers  the behavior with no sul-
fide precipitation (pS free) but with a fixed pH.   The only significant ef-
fect is that due to carbon dioxide production at  a  fixed pH, which increases
net alkalinity.  With all diffusion coefficients  at the value of sulfate the
increase is larger than the chloride diffusion  case due to the increased re-
tention of carbon dioxide within the sediment interstitial waters.

    In order to understand the species  dependent  transport calculations con-
sider the principle ions that form net  alkalinity in this calculation and
their diffusion coefficients:
      [Net Alk]     -    [HCO~]  +  2[SOp  +   IHS'l   -

      Diffusion                                                           (10)
      Coefficients    (0.583)     (0.524)      (0.852)    (0.963)

As net alkalinity  is produced or destroyed within  the  sediment by the solid
phases it tends to diffuse either out to or  in  from the  boundary, since it
is driven by the gradient of net alkalinity.   If the diffusion coefficients
of the species that make up net  alkalinity are  all  lowered,  more net alka-
linity remains in the sediment as can be ^een from the two  species indepen-
dent  cases in Figure 4a.  The species dependent profile  can  be understood by
comparing it to the species independent profile at the diffusion coefficient
of sulfate.  The differences are a slightly  increased  bicarbonate diffusion
coefficient relative to sulfate, equation (10), an increased bisulfide dif-
fusion coefficient and an almost twofold increase  in ammonia diffusion. The
effect on the diffusion of net alkalinity toward the boundary is in propor-
tion  to the quantity of each ion and the change in diffusion coefficients.
Computations show that the largest effect is due to the  excess bicarbonate
diffusion, which causes a decline in the profile,  followed  by the bisulfide
diffusion, which is most effective in the region of sulfate  reduction and
causes the initial drop in the profile.

    The direction of the change  to be expected  from the  excess diffusion re-
lative to sulfate can be understood in terms of the profiles of the indivi-
dual  species that make up net alkalinity.  Bicarbonate is  increasing with
respect to depth so that the transport will  therefore  lower  the net alka-
linity profile.  The same is true for bisulfide.   For  ammonia, the diffusion
is also toward the boundary so that increased diffusion  will lower the am-
monia profile.  But this increases the net alkalinity  since  ammonia enters

                                    102

-------
                         NET ALKALINITY


                       pH FIXED. pS VARYING
~     35
       30
 •» cr
r\  0>
CM
       25
       20
            (•*    D30.
10        30       50       70       90

             DEPTH,  cm


       pH VARYING, pS FIXED
35
I
2
7 30
7- >
r? E
O
£ 25
CN
< 9n
W

-








|c
(





^^
M
I





r t
i




-f
p
i



.J


i i



i



10       30      50       70       90
             DEPTH, cm


         pH AND pS VARYING
                                                        -p
                                                        CU
                                                        C TD
                                                          •r—
                                                        C i—
                                                        o o
                                                          co
                                                        to
                                                        C
                                                        o  •
                                                        •r- CU
                                                        •P O
                                                        U E
                                                        (0 CU
                                                        CU i-
                                                                                CU CO
                                                                                •r- .E
                                                                                      to
                                                              O -P  CU
                                                              CU     10
                                                              O.-P  03  E
                                                              to  3  O  O
                                                        0)  CU
                                                        t/>  s-
                                                        03
                                                       J= I—
                                                        O. 03
                                                           3
                                                                          i— >
                                                                          O
                                                                          to i.
                                                                             o
                                                                          -o f-
                                                                          E
                                                                           -P
                                                                          •i- co
                                                                          o
                                                                          cu >>
                                                                          CX IT)
                                                                          i/i ca

                                                                          t|_ CU
                                                                          O ^£
                                                                             03
                                                                          to CU
                                                                          •P Q_
                                                                          U 03
                                                                          CD U)
                                                                          «f- cu
                                                                          4- J=
                                                                          cu o

                                                                          cu
                                                                          CD fO
                                                                          (- -^
                                                                          3 i—
                                                                          cn 

   XJ
 to  cu
 CO  >
 E  S-
•i-  CO
i—  tO
   _Q
•O  O
 CU
-E  CU
 to -c
 03 -P
•o

  •>  O3

 CU T3
 to  CO
 03  X
 O •!-
   4-
-P
 i-  to
 O T-
 Q.
 to DC
 E  Q-
 03
 S-  CU
                                                                   •P  10
                                                                    S-  3
                                                                    O 4-
                                                                    Q.4-
                                                                    to -r-
                                                                    E -a
                                                                    03
                                                                    £-  cu
                                                                   -p j=
                                                                      •P
                                                                   •p
                                                                    E -P
                                                                    CU  03
                                                                   •o
                                                                    E -O
                                                                    CU  E
                                                                    Q.  03
                                                                    CO
                                                                   "O i —
                                                                    E
                                                                    r- O

                                                                    to  •
                                                                    CU  E
                                                                   •r-  o
                                                                    O T-
                                                                    CO
                                                                    Q.  CU
                                                                    to T3
            o -a
            •p cu
               >
            T3 S- to
            CU CU •!->
            S tO r—
            O -Q 3
            i — O tO
            i—    CU
            03 CO S-
               ^1
            to -P r-
            -i-    03
               -P o
            DC 03 -r-
            a.    -P
               -a E
            CU CU CU
            -E x -a
                                                                                                     O
                                                                                                     00
                                                                    CO
           x-^    CU
           jo to >

                  en
              co
             • Q. to
                  cu
            CU CU to
           -P J= 03
            03 -P O
            O
           •r- 4-> -P
           TD 3 S-
            E JQ O
           •r-    Q.
              —- 10
            to to E
            03 E 03
               O i-
              •r- +J
      S- O
      o
      4- S-
         O
      10 f-
CU 03 •— -P
      3 E
      10 CU
      CU ••-
      i- O
                                                                          CU

                                                                          03
                                                                               -P
                                                                                E
 E
 CO
 OL   -
 CU to
T3 CO
   to
 to O3
 CU U

 U -P
 CU S-
 CL O
 to Q.
   10
 CU E
-E 03
•P S-
   -P

 £+>
 tO E
   CO
 to T3
 CO E
 E CO
•r- Q.
i— CU
   -a
   E
   O
   03 _
 •> cu cu
 «=!-S- TD
O    E
CO D) CO
Q E Q.
   •r- CO
 •> S- T3
E CO E
O 4- -r-
                      03  3
                      >  to
                         CU
                      O  S-
                     -P

                     T3  03
                      CU  (J

                      O -P
                     c—  E
                     c—  CU
                      03 T3
                        •r-
                      CU
                      S-  CU
                      03  >

                     CO  D)
                      a.
                         to
                      CO  CU
                     J=  CO
                     -P  03
                         o
                     •o
                      E -P
                      03  V.
                         O
                     DC  Q.
                      Q.  to
                                                                                  •P  E
                                                                                   O  CD
                                                                                  ca -o
      CU 4-
      .E «t-
      I— CU
         O
         O

      >•> E
      S- O
      03 •!-
      > to
         3
      O 4-
      -p q-
         •i—
      •o -o
      cu
      3 cu
      O -E
      •— -P

      03

      to
            
                                                                          O
10      30       50       70

             DEPTH, cm
                                                       90
                                                    103

-------
the definition of net alkalinity with a minus sign,  Equation  (10).   Thus the
decreases due to the excess bicarbonate and bisulfide  diffusion  are compen-
sated for to some extent by the excess ammonia diffusion.   It  is  these ex-
cess diffusion effects that cause the species dependent  profile  in  Figure
3c, the calculation with both pH and pS phases fixed,  to  be  lower than the
species independent profile at the diffusion coefficient  of  sulfate.

    These effects are even more apparent in Figures  4b and 4c  which are cal-
culated without the pH phase present.  Since the pH  is now free  to  respond
to additions of carbon dioxide and the removal of H2S  (Figure  4b) no  net
alkalinity is generated and for the species independent  transport case the
net alkalinity is constant.  The decrease in the species  dependent  case is
due to the bicarbonate excess diffusion which is compensated for  to some ex-
tent by the ammonia excess diffusion.  With the pS also  free in  Figure 4c,
the only difference is the presence of HS" as a component of net  alkalinity
and its excess diffusion further lowers the profile.

    To summarize, the net alkalinity can initially decrease for  two reasons:
either as a purely species dependent transport effect  (Figure  4c),  or in re-
sponse to the precipitation of ferrous sulfide at constant pH  (Figure 3c),
where the decrease in this case is enhanced by species dependent  effects.
The subsequent increase is in response to the production  of carbon  dioxide
at constant pH (Figures 3c and 4a) and is again modified  by species depend-
ent transport effects.

    An interesting question arises if one inquires into  the generality of
these results.  Since they depend so directly on the assumption  of  constant
pH controlled by a pH phase and since the pH of interstitial waters is sel-
dom constant, although for station 856 data it is very nearly  constant:  pH =
7.40 + 0.18, it might appear that their applicability  to  other situations is
restricted.  However consider the following:  The calculated responses of
net alkalinity to the C02 source and the H2S sink are  the result  of the re-
quirement of a constant pH, that is, an infinitely well-buffered  system.
Suppose that in most sediments there are solid phase-aqueous phase  reactions
which serve as buffers and tend to resist the pH changes  induced  by the C02
source and f^S sink.  These reactions would titrate  net  alkalinity  into or
out of the aqueous phase, much as the hypothetical pH  phase does, but with-
out its infinite buffer capacity.  Thus the pH would change somewhat  in re-
sponse to the sources and sinks, but so also would the net alkalinity.  As a
consequence one would expect to see profiles of net  alkalinity that only in-
crease, if no sulfide precipitation occurs, or initially  decrease and then
increase after sulfate depletion, or only decrease if  sulfate  is  not  de-
pleted.

    A selection of net alkalinity profiles are shown in  Figure 5.  They have
been chosen to display the characteristic shapes that  are calculated  in Fi-
gures 3 and 4.  Figure 5a shows an increase due, presumably, to  the CO?
source but with sulfate present and approximately constant,  indicating that
another electron acceptor was involved.  Figure 5b from  a station in the up-
stream reach of Chesapeake Bay (Cl < l°/°o) exhibits the  expected increase.
The small quantity of available sulfate is depleted  in the top five cm,
after which the net alkalinity increases in response to  the C02  source.  Fi-

                                     104

-------
                LONG ISLAND SOUND
                                                   CHESAPEAKE BAY. 922W
60
—
t-
§50
I-
UJ
Z
Af\
*»u

cc
	 DO
V
Z
< 55
_i
UJ
Z
45
•* +t


_ 32
1
ET ALKALINITY, m
8 8 8
MM
z
tA
£*v
w • 	 1 '
' '
1 	 '
^~* SO4" ~ CONSTANT
1 1 1 1 1
0 10 20 30 40 5(
DEPTH, cm
SOMES SOUND. MAINE
 0
_ I— I
h- 1
_ SO4= = 0
I-HI-H
1 1 1 1 1
0 16 32 48 64 8(
DEPTH, cm
CHESAPEAKE BAY. 845 G
le)
- Q S04- > 0
0
00
0 ° 0
- o
1 1 1 1 1
0 20 40 60 80 10
                   DEPTH, cm
                                           20
                                           10
(b)
- 0° °°
- a
~ ° SO4* a 0
o
? 1 1 I


I
                                                    20    40    60   80   100
                                                        DEPTH, cm

                                                   LAKE ERIE, CENTRAL BASIN
l.BU
2.60

2.40

2.20

700
(d
—
(
—

—


)

1
1







1


(






I
1


SO4= s


i
1



0

t
1




1

!





1






                                               0    5    10    15    20    25

                                                        DEPTH,cm


                                                    CHESAPEAKE BAY, 8S6C
                                           30
                                           25
                                           20
                                              (f)

                                             - °D
4~ > 0
                                                         I
      i
                                                    20
 40    60
DEPTH, cm
80   IOC
 Figure 5.  Characteristic shapes  for  net  alkalinity.   The vertical  dashed
line marks the depth of sulfate  depletion.   Increasing net alkalinity:  (a)
 Intertidal zone, Long Island Sound, Clinton,  Conn.  (Berner et aj_.,  1970);
  (b) Chesapeake Bay Station 922W,  18/XII/73 (Bricker  et aj_.,  1977).  Net
 alkalinity decreasing then increasing after sulfate depletion; (c)  Somes
 Sound, Maine (Berner et al., 1970).   (d)  Lake Erie, Central Basin.   Mean
 + standard deviation of three stations:   41°49'03", 42°00'00", 42°27'14"9
  sampled every month from May through August, 1971  (Weiller,  1972).  Net
alkalinity decreasing; (e) Chesapeake  Bay  Station 845G, 21/VIII/72 (Bricker
et al., 1977).  (f) Chesapeake Bay Station 856C,  30/VI/71  (Bricker et a]_-,
           1977).  Note the increase after the depletion of sulfate.
                                     105

-------
gures 5c and 5d illustrate the initial decline  due  to  sulfide precipitation
and the subsequent increase after the depth  at  which the  sulfate is de-
pleted.  The location is indicated on the figure.   The  example from Lake
Erie is included because of its similar behavior  in all respects except that
the magnitudes of the changes in net alkalinity are an  order  of magnitude
smaller than the brackish and sea water examples.   Figures  5e and 5f from
Chesapeake Bay stations with higher salinity (Cl  =<  10°/00)  have more exten-
sive regions of declining net alkalinity.  In both  cases  the  decline is
within the region of sulfate reduction as indicated.  The majority of other
profiles examined from Chesapeake Bay sediments exhibit the decreasing and
increasing pattern in the saline regions, with  the  increase starting after
sulfate is depleted, and a purely increasing  pattern in the fresher water
regions, as illustrated in Figure 5.

    Similar patterns are present in the Santa Barbara Basin data of
Sholkovitz (1973).  Two cores (B and Gl) exhibit  a  continual  decline in net
alkalinity in the presence of decreasing sulfate  concentration.   For the
third core (G2), the net alkalinity profile  is  essentially  constant to 30 cm
with an increase at the last measured depth  (33 cm).  The sulfate is essen-
tially constant as in the case of the Long Island Sound example (Figure 4a).

    These observations tend to indicate that  the  results  of the detailed
calculations of net alkalinity (Figures 3 and 4)  and the  interpretation of
the changes have a certain generality.  The  net alkalinity  changes are due
to the solid phase buffering reactions only  and rot aqueous phase reactions.
The buffereing reactions are responding to the  precipitation  of sulfide by
decreasing alkalinity and to the production  of  carbon dioxide by increasing
alkalinity after the depletion of sulfate.   It  is expected  that the decline
is accentuated and the increase is somewhat mitigated by  species dependent
transport effects.


DISSOLVED GASES AND GAS PHASE TRANSPORT

    After the depletion of sulfate, methane  forms and if  the  sum of the par-
tial pressures of the dissolved gases exceed  the  total  static pressure at
that depth bubbles will form (Reeburgh 1969).   The  calculation presented be-
low is designed to reproduce this behavior and  to examine the consequences
of various gas phase transport mechanisms on  the  distribution of dissolved
nitrogen, argon, and methane.

    As in the case of sulfate reduction the  processes by  which methane is
formed are bacterial.  The basic features of  the  reaction in  sediments is
that methane is produced only if sulfate is  essentially absent and it is
consumed within the zone of sulfate reduction (Martens  and  Berner 1977;
Reeburgh and Heggie 1977).  This is precisely the behavior  predicted by
thermodynamic equilibria calculations.  In order  to assign  these reactions
to the fast reaction set it is necessary that the kinetics  be rapid relative
to the principal slow reaction: the decomposition of sediment organic matter
(K = 0.005 yr-1) and the mass transport time  scale  (z2/2D = 200 - 1250 days
for z = 10 - 25 cm).  No direct evidence exists that the  kinetics have the


                                    106

-------
required time scale so that the results  of  these  calculations  and  their com-
parison to observations are indirect evidence.

    The observations for Chesapeake Bay  sediments  come  from  station  858-C
which is at a sounding depth of 30 m (Reeburgh  1967,  1969) for  the winter of
1967.  The dissolved nitrogen, argon,  and methane  concentrations  are re-
ported for two cores, the total carbon dioxide  for  one  core.  The  reported
chloride concentration and temperature are  used to  set  the solubility of  the
dissolved gases at a pressure of four  atmospheres  (Table  1), and the bound-
ary concentration of sulfate.  The nitrogen  and argon boundary  conditions
are set at the average of the reported 0-15  cm  values in  order  to  mitigate
the time variable effects of the seasonal variation of  the overlying water
concentrations (Martens and Berner 1977).   The  depth of penetration  for sea-
sonal time variable effects in on the  order  of  /tfr/To =  5.5 cm  (uj = 2ir/365
radians/day) so that the effect should not  extend  below 10 or 15 cm.   Bio-
turbation effects are probably limited to this  depth as well (Martens  and
Berner 1977).

    The purpose of this calculation is to investigate the effects  of gas
phase transport.  Consider the simpliest assumption: that the gas  phase is
stationary relative to the solid phase and  that it  is not diffusing.   Since
in these examples the location of gas  phase  formation is  below  30  cm biotur-
bation need not be considered in the mixing  of  the  gas  phase.   The results
are shown in Figure (6).  The total C02  is  higher  than  station  856 which
implies a larger decomposition rate.   The remaining parameters  are as  be-
fore (Table 4).  Increasing the electron to  carbon  stoichiometry increases
the concentration of methane and decreases  the  concentration of total  C02
as more of the carbon in being reduced to methane.  The availability of
more methane causes a larger gas phase which forms  closer to the sediment
water interface.  The dissolved methane  profile flattens  as the dissolved
gas equilibrates with its gas phase partial  pressure.   The calculated
quantity of gas is discussed below.

    The computed dissolved nitrogen, argon,  and their molar ratio, together
with the observations, are shown in Figure  7.   The  sharper decline of  the
dissolved nitrogen relative to argon is  due  to  its  relative insolubility
(Reeburgh 1969).  As gases equilibrate with  the gas phase, nitrogen  prefer-
entially migrates to that phase.  An electron to carbon stoichiometry of
0=3 appears to be consistent with these data.  The gas  phase  is  computed
to be 85 - 88% Cfy which seems quite reasonable (Martens  1976).
    The most interesting and initially unexpected feature of these  profiles
is that they are linearly decreasing even within the  zone of sulfate  reduc-
tion where no gas phase is computed to exist.  This  is a direct consequence
of the mass balance requirements and the hypothesized gas phase transport.
The stationary gas phase is advecting at the sedimentation  velocity which
causes a downward flux of nitrogen and argon.  This  downward flux must  be
supplied from the sediment-water interface and in the presence of substan-
tail diffusion of the dissolved species a linear gradient is required.
Since relatively more nitrogen is advecting with the  gas phase its  gradient
is steeper than that for argon.  The nitrogen to argon ratio reflects this
effect .
                                      107

-------
               CHESAPEAKE BAY STATION 858-C


                           METHANE  (aq)
                10      30      50      70

                             DEPTH, cm



                          TOTAL CO2 (aq)
    800
                10       30      50       70

                             DEPTH, cm




                            GAS PHASE
 90
   0.20
8 0.00
                         30     50      70

                            DEPTH, cm
90
    •^ 10 >>
 i— E d) S-
 re o •>— re  S-
 O J3 O E  O  O)
 •r- $_ d) o <*- .E
 •p re O-T-    -P
 s- o c/) -P  ,
 > 0)   -P  re .a
^ E  -10

 to  " E dJ  d)  dJ
 cu  -P  10  E
•»—' O       dJ  O
    •r- d) TD  S-  O
•o -a to d;  Q.
 d)    re E     s-
 -P E -E 3  to  d)
 3 O D- IO  O -P
 Q..O    (O  CO -P
 E ^ ^o re  re  re
 o re 3    o  E
 o o o to
       d) *i~  d) -p
•a to 3    a>  E
 E 3 CT d)  S-  d)
 re o re to .c  E  •
    a>    re -P -i- to
-—- 3 to j=    -o E
 to cr 3 a.  d) d) o
i— re r—   .E (O 'r—
 O    CX IO I—   -P
J3 i—    re     o o
 E re to Q>    "r- re
 5->-p re     -Ed)
 to o a> d)  en re J-
—--P   ^  E D1
      «)- I— -i- S- E
•a ••< o     to o o
 d) i—       3   -r-
 > ^i—   • M- M- -P
 S- E ~^ to M- O O
 dJ O 10  E -r-    3
 I/) ^Q fO ^5 ^O ^D "O

o re   -P -P -P s-
    o M- re  o re
       o r—  E s- d)
 •• Dl    3       to
o E to o -a E re
co    ai i— E cu .E
Ln  "i— re  re Q) D.
CO d) O O    O
    E E    to i- to
 E re   r— -a T3 3
 O -E «i— r- >> O
•r- -P E re o .E d)
•P d) O    to    3
 re E •"-  s-    o o"

oo -o re M-  E
    OJ S-    d) E
 >» > -P -o E o
 re r— E d) T- -Q
00 O d) 10 -O S-
    to o 3 a> re
 d) to E    10 O
-^ M- o (o
 re -a o •>- cu cu
 d)         .E J=
 O.^-. OJ -P -P -P
 re re «o S-
 to — re o o
 d)   -E O.-P ••
.C <4- D. to    ca
o o   E -P
      i/> re  o CD
    10 re s- d) E
  « E 0>-P D.T-
<£> o      to (o
   •1-1— -p d) re
 d; -P re E  i- cu
 S- 3 -P d)    S-
 3 .a o ~o -E o
 CT>-r- -P E -P E
•r- S_   d) -I- •!-
U- 4-> T3 Q-  S
    tO E d)
   •r— re "o
                                                108

-------
                    10
                  - 8

                   E

                  z 6
                  UJ
                  o
                  o 4
                  QC H
1.0



0.8



0.6



0.4



0.2



0.0
                           CHESAPEAKE BAY STATION 858-C


                                   NITROGEN (aq)
                                          0 = 2.3
                            0=2.7
                               0 = 3.0
                            10    30     50     70     90

                                      DEPTH, cm



                                     ARGON (aq)
                          O3  O
                          "•^nsm.—
                                         0=2.7     0=2.3
                           0=3.0
                            10    30     50     70     90

                                     DEPTH (cm)




                               NITROGEN(aq)/ARGON(aq)
                            10     30     50    70    90

                                      DEPTH, cm
Figure 7   Chesapeake Bay  Station  858C:  Observed (symbols) and  computed
   (lines) vertical distributions  of:   (a) Dissolved nitrogen  gas,  mg
   nitrogen/1; (b) Dissolved  argon, mg argon/1; (c) Their mole ratio.
                   The  conditions  are as in Figure 6.
                                    109

-------
    The quantity of total gas formed is calculated  to  range from 10 - 70 mM
or 5 - 30% of the total volume at 4 atm.  Although  gas phase volume was not
measured for these sediments, observations by  Schubel  (1974) suggest that it
is on the order of 0.1 to 1.0% of the total volume  when it  is observed
(Table 2).  A possibility is that the gas phase migrates  to the  sediment-
water interface via "bubble tubes" as observed by Martens (1977) without any
appreciable interaction with the pore waters.  This  would correspond to a
loss of the gas phase that is essentially independent  of  the transport me-
chanisms considered in these calculations.  The sole effect of the  bubble
tube transport mechanism would be to decrease  the size of the gas phase but
not the mole fractions since the removal would be proportional to the gas
phase composition.  Therefore the computed profiles  of the  dissolved species
would remain unchanged.

    A second possibility is that the gas phase has  an  upward velocity rela-
tive to the solid phases and that this velocity is  low enough so that the
aqueous gas phase equilibria is maintained everywhere.  Figure 8 illustrates
the computed results for upward velocities of  0.5 and  5.0 cm/yr. As ex-
pected (Barnes et_ a]_. 1975) there is a peak of nitrogen,  argon,  and their
ratio at the location of the gas phase dissolution.  As a consequence there
is an increasing gradient from the sediment-water interface to the  location
of gas phase formation.  The mass fluxes of nitrogen and  argon associated
with this gradient are upward; that is, nitrogen and argon  are being sup-
plied to the overlying water.  Their source, in this calculation, is the
lower boundary of the sediment, which is set at the  computed concentrations
of the previous stationary gas phase calculations.   It is necessary to
specify the boundary concentrations at the lower boundary of the sediment
only if there is transport from this boundary  into  the sediment  segments
within the calculation.  For an upward gas phase velocity this situation
occurs, but for all previous calculations this boundary is  irrelevant.  It
is evident that the situation depicted in Figure 8  cannot persist inde-
finitely since eventually the nitrogen and argon at  the bottom boundary of
the sediment will be depleted.  As a consequence, although  these peaks in
nitrogen, argon, and their ratio are consistent with mass balance,  they must
be a temporary effect.

    Eventually, for a constant upward gas phase velocity, the bottom bound-
ary concentrations will be zero and the computed profiles for this  situa-
tion are shown in Figure (9) for total C02, methane  and the gas  phase con-
centration; and in Figure (10) for nitrogen, argon,  and their ratio.  The
upward gas phase velocity is chosen to be 5 cm/yr, which  results in gas
phase volumes within the reported range (Schubel 1974).   The gas phase con-
centration is highest at the point of formation since  the upward gas phase
velocity is transporting gas that has been generated by the methane forma-
tion to this location.  The transport of nitrogen and  argon below the depth
of gas phase formation is downward via diffusion of  the dissolved gases and
upward via the gas phase velocity.  The net result  is  essentially a zero
gradient of concentration above the depth of gas phase formation.

    The consequences of this transport regime  is that  no  flux of gas is com-
puted at the sediment-water interface.  If such fluxes are  known to occur,
this would indicate that the results of the stationary gas  phase with rapid

                                     110

-------
          CHESAPEAKE  BAY  STATION 858-C


                   NITROGEN (aq)
    10
  O)




  Z  6
  LLJ

  (D

  O  4
  CE
-5.0 cm/yr



    —0.5 cm/yr
   1.0



_  0.8

D)

E 0.6



|  0.4

or

**  0.2



   0.0
             10      30     50     70     90

                       DEPTH, cm



                       ARGON (aq)
                     —5.0 cm/yr
                           —0.5 cm/yr
           0.1 cm/yr
                     I
   I
I
             10      30     50     70      90


                       DEPTH, cm




                NITROGEN(aq)/ARGON(aq)
   45.0
                   —5.0 cm/yr


                        —0.5 cm/yr
LU
  20.0
                   30     50     70     90

                      DEPTH, cm
                                                                  "O O) -r- CD

                                                                   S- > -P 0)
                                            ex o
                                            to
                                              cu
                                                                   ens- -(-> O)
                                                 CD
                                                                   CL)
                                      O CXI
                                       111

-------
             CHESAPEAKE BAY STATION 858-C

                        TOTAL CO2  0)    r—
                       C .c^ re
                       o +J re -P .
                      •r-    	O I
                      •P  C    4->
                                                                     C TD  10
                                                                     O OJ  0)
                                                                     O (/>  C
                                                                        3 -1-
                               -o
                               C
                               re
                               r-  O


                               o  
 « 0)
 a>
 C
 re re u_
JC
-M U1 C
 O) 3 «r-
                      .C -o E    Q. a)
                      -P  C >>T3    to
                      •r-  re to Q>  to o
                       3    v— >  re.
                                                                     >> c -o
                                                                     4-?0
                                                                     O «/>  S-
                                                                     O 3   -r-  O

                                                                     0)   4-
                                                                     «/) d)  O
                                                                     re 10
                                                                     ^ re  c:
                                                                     O..C  O
                               8.
                               to O -P

                               -O r- T3

                               x—» to O
                               xi re Q.

                                    (U
«/>    •*->
re 10 3
o> re .a
   cn-r-
-o    s-
s- o -i->
re c 10
                        .
                       3 -M

                       c o "re
                       re Q. u
                         to «r-
                      «4- C •!->
                       o re s-
                         S- (U
                      •«->-«->>
                       u
                       (U -»-> 
                                                                             c o
                                                                             o E
                                                                             .a T-
                                                                             s- i—
                                                                             re i—
                                                                             o •!-
                                    s-
                                    o
                                    o
      10
      OJ
      to
      re
   E o
 CD
 E  « O)
   C (U
 « O S-
 OJ M- J=
•o +J -p
•r- re
 x i- a>
 O 4-> -C
•r- C I—
-o a»
   u
 c c
 o o
_a u

 re (u
 o 10
   re
 t/i ^
 3 Q.
 O
 
-------
                            CHESAPEAKE BAY STATION 858-C

                                     NITROGEN (aq)
                     10
                      8
                    UJ
                    CD
  2 2


    0




   1.0

_ 0.8


E. 0.6

O
CJ 0.4

-------
bubbling would be more realistic.  However  without  seasonal  measurements of
the gas flux as well as complete interstitial  and gas  phase  measurements, it
is not possible to decide if upward velocities  with gas  phase dissolution
does or does not occur at certain periods.  The observations of Barnes ei_
al. (1975) suggest that it can occur.   But  the  interstitial  water measure-
ments themselves cannot be used to distinguish  between the regimes of gas
phase transport discussed above.


CONCLUSIONS

    The mass balance equations for species  dependent transport and fast re-
actants at equilibrium can be solved using  the  methods presented above.  It
appears to be a reasonable approximation to compute the  distribution of the
species with components C,H,0, and S using  the  requirements  of chemical
equilibrium, but not the nitrogen species.  The gas phase  -  aqueous phase
reactions at equilibrium correspond to  the  case of  slow  gas  phase motion.

    For species dependent transport the computations reproduce the major
features of the observed data as well as the more detailed variations of
the carbon to nitrogen ration and the net alkalinity.  The use of net alka-
linity as a variable that reflects only the effects of the solid phase -
aqueous phase reactions and species dependent transport  simplifies the in-
terpretation of observed alkalinity variations.  The initial  decline appears
to be due to sulfide precipitation if it is occurring, and the subsequent
increase is due to C02 production.  The net alkalinity change is due to the
response of the sediment solid phase -  aqueous  phase buffering reactions.
The computational framework provides the means  for  examining the relative
impact of the various mechanisms that affect net alkalinity  and the other
species.

    The distribution of the dissolved gases is  affected  by the transport of
the resulting gas phase.  For the Chesapeake Bay station analyzed, a sta-
tionary gas phase is consistent with the dissolved  gas observations but not
the gas phase volume, which is larger than  that observed at  other stations.
It is possible that the excess gas is vented sporadically  via bubble tubes.
Alternately a slow upward motion of the gas phase is consistent with the
dissolved gas data and the probable gas phase volume but would not account
for observations of gas escaping from the sediment-water interface.  It is
not possible to distinguish between these gas phase transport regimes with-
out simultaneous measurements of dissolved  gas  concentrations, gas flux and
sediment gas volume.  For a complete analysis,  seasonal  data and a time
variable computation are necessary.

    A completely comprehensive analysis would include  the  solid phase -
aqueous phase reactions explicitly; in  particular,  the reductions of iron
and manganese and the relevant sediment buffering reactions.   It is clear
from this analysis that a very comprehensive data set  is required that in-
cludes not only the complete interstitial water chemistry  but also a de-
tailed analysis of the sediment solid phases.   Both the  organic material and
the inorganic phases must be characterized.  The sediment  buffering reac-
tions  are central to a detailed understanding of the net alkalinity and

                                     114

-------
their nature, e.g., precipitation or dissolution of calcium carbonate, clay
cation exchanges, authigenie mineral formations, etc., would have to be con-
sidered.  An analysis within the framework presented above would then
clarify their relative importance.


REFERENCES

Atkinson, L.P. and F.A. Richards.  1967.  The occurrence and distribution
    of methane in the marine environment.  Deep-Sea Res., 14.  pp. 673-684.

Barnes, R.O., K.K. Bertine, and E.D. Goldberg.  1975.  N2:  Ar nitrification
    and denitrification in Southern California borderland basin sediments.
    Limnol. and Oceanogr. 20.  pp. 962-970.

Ben-Yaakov, S.  1972.  Diffusion of sea water ions.  I. Diffusion of sea
    water into a dilute solution.  Geochim. et. Cosmochim. Acta.  36 p.
    1395- 1406.

Ben-Yaakov, S.  1973.  Buffering of pore water of recent anoxic marine
    sediment.  Limnol. and Oceanogr. 18(1).  pp. 86-94.

Berner, R.A.  1970.  Sedimentary pyrite formation.  Am. J. Sci. 268.  pp. 1-
    23.

Berner, R.A.  1974.  Kinetic models for the early diagenesis of nitrogen,
    sulfur, phosphorus and silicon in anoxic marine sediments.  In The Sea,
    Vol. 5, E.D. Goldberg (Ed.).  J. Wiley and Sons, N.Y.  pp. 4?7-450.

Berner, R.A.  1977.  Stoichiometric models for nutrient regeneration in
    anoxic sediments.  Limnol. and Oceanogr. 22(5).  pp. 781-786.

Berner, R.A., M.R. Scott and C. Thomlison.  1970.  Carbonate alkalinity in
    the pore water of anoxic marine sediments.  Limnol. and Oceanogr. 15.
    pp. 544-549.

Biggs, R.B.  1963.  Deposition and early diagenesis of modern Chesapeake Bay
    muds.  Ph.D. Thesis.  Lehigh University, Pa.

Biggs, R.B.  1967.  The sediments of Chesapeake Bay.  J.n Estuaries.  G.H.
    Lauff (Ed.).  Publ. No. 83.  Am. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Washington, D.C.
    pp. 239-260.

Bordovskiy, O.K.  1965.  Accumulation and transformation of organic sub-
    stances in marine sediments.  Mar. Geol. 3.  pp. 33-82.

Bray, J.  1973.   The behavior of phosphate in the interstitial waters of
    Chesapeake Bay sediments.  Ph.D. Thesis.  Johns Hopkins University,
    Baltimore, MD.  pp. 1-149.
                                     115

-------
Bricker, O.P., G. Matisoff, and G.R. Holdren, Jr.  1977.   Interstitial
    water chemistry of Chesapeake Bay sediments.  Dept. of Natural Re-
    sources.  Maryland Geological Survey.  Basic Data Report No. 9.  pp.  1-
    67.

Carpenter, J.H.  1957.  A study of some major cations in natural waters.
    Chesapeake Bay Institute of the Johns Hopkins Univ., Tech. Report XV,
    80 p.  Quoted by Biggs (1963).

Chapman, T.W.  1967.  The transport properties of concentrated electronic
    solutions.  Ph.D. Thesis.  Univ. of Calif., Berkeley (UCRL-17768).

DiToro, D.M.  1976.  Combining chemical equilibrium and phytoplankton
    models - a general methodology.  _In_ Modeling Biochemical Processes in
    Aquatic Ecosystems.  R. Canale (Ed.).  Ann Arbor Science Press, Ann
    Arbor, Mich.  pp. 233-256.

Gardner, L.R.  1973.  Chemical models for sulfate reduction in closed
    anaerobic marine environments.  Geochim. et. Cosmochim. Acta 37.

Garrells, R.M. and C.L. Christ.  1965.  Solutions, minerals and equilibrium.
    Harper, N.Y.  450 p.

Goldberg, E.D. and M. Koide.  1963.  Rates of sediment accumulation in the
    Indian Ocean.  J_n Earth Science and Meteoritics.  J. Geiss and E.D.
    Goldberg (Eds.).  North-Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam,  pp. 90-102.

Harvey, H.W.  1966.  The chemistry and fertility of sea waters (2nd edi-
    tion), Cambridge Univ. Press, London,  p. 168.

Himmelbau, D.  1964.  Diffusion of dissolved gases.  Chem.  Rev.

Holdren, G.R., Jr., O.P- Bricker, III, and G. Matisoff.  1975.  A model for
    the control of dissolved manganese in the interstitial  waters of Chesa-
    peake Bay.  ]j^ Marine Chemistry in the Coastal Environment.  T.M. Church
    (Ed.).  ACS Sym. Ser. 18, Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, D.C.  pp. 364-381.

Imoboden, D.M.  1975.  Interstitial transport of solutes in non-steady state
    accumulations and compacting sediments.  Earth . Planet . Sci. Letters
    27.  pp. 221-228, 1975.

Kemp, A.L.W.  1973.  Preliminary information on the nature of organic matter
    in the surface sediments of Lakes Huron, Erie and Ontario.  Proc. Symp.
    on Hydrogeochemistry and Biogerchemistry.  E. Ingerson (Ed.).  The
    Clarke Co., Washington, D.C.  Vol. II., pp. 40-48.

Kramer, J.R.  1964. Theoretical model of the chemical composition of fresh
    water with application to the Great Lakes.  Pub. No. 11, Great Lakes
    Research Division, Univ. of Mich.  p. 147.

Lerman, A. and H. Taniguchi.  1972.  Strontium 90 - diffusional transport  in
    sediments of the Great Lakes.  J. Geophic. Res. 77(3).  p. 474.

                                     116

-------
Li Y-H,  Gregroy, S.  1974.  Diffusion of ions in sea water and deep-sea
    sediments.  Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta 38.  pp. 703-714.

Martens, C.S.  1976.  Control of methane sediment-water bubble transport by
    macroinfaunal irrigation in Cape Lookout Bight, North Carolina.  Science
    192.  pp. 998-1000.

Martens, C.S. and R.A. Berner.  1977.  Interstitial water chemistry of
    anoxic Long Island Sound sediments.  I. Dissolved gases.  Limnol. and
    Oceanogr. 22(1).  pp. 10-25.

Philp, R.P. and M. Calvin.  1976.  Kerogen structures in recently deposited
    algal mats at Laguna Mormona, Baja, California:  A model system for the
    determination of kerogen structures in ancient sediments.  In Environ-
    mental Biogeochemistry, vol. 1.  J.O. Nriagu (Ed.).  Ann ArlxJr Science,
    Ann  Arbor, Mich.  pp. 131-148.

Powers,  M.C.  1954.  Clay diagenesis in the Chesapeake Bay area: Clays and
    Clay minerals.  Natl. Conf. 2nd Natl. Acad. Sci. Natl. Res. Council Pub.
    327.  pp. 68-80.  Quoted by Biggs, 1963.

Rashid,  M.A. and L.H. King.  1970.  Major oxygen-containing functional
    groups present in humic and fulvic acids fractions isolated from con-
    trasting marine environments.  Geochim. et. Cosmochim. Acta. 34.  pp.
    193-201.

Reeburgh, W.S.  1967.  Measurements of gases in sediments.  Ph.D. Thesis.
    Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore, MD.

Reeburgh, W.S.  1969.  Observations of gases in Chesapeake Bay sediments.
    Limnol. and Oceanogr.  p. 368.

Reid, R.C., J.M. Prausnitz and T.K. Sherwood.  1977.  The properties of
    gases and liquids.  McGraw Hill, N.Y.  p. 576.

Robinson, R.A. and R.H. Stokes.  1959.  Electrolyte solutions.  Butter-
    worths, London,  p. 463.

Rosenfeld, J.K. and R.A. Berner.  1976.  Ammonia adsorption in nearshore
    anoxic sediments.  Abstr. Geol. Soc. Am. Annu. Meeting (Denver),  p.
    1076.  Quoted by Berner, 1977.

Schubel, J.R.  1974.  Gases bubbles and the acoustically imperetrable of
    turbid character of some estuarine sediments.  J[n Natural Gases in
    Marine Sediments.  I.R. Kaplan (Ed.).  Plenum Press, N.Y.  pp. 275-298.

Schubel, J.R. and D.J. Hirschberg.  1977.  Pb210 - determined sedimentation
    rate and accumulation of metals in sediments at a station in Chesapeake
    Bay.  Ches. Sci. 18(4), pp. 379-382.

Sholkovitz, E.  1973.  Interstitial water chemistry of the Santa Barbara
    Basin sediments.  Geochim. et. Cosmochim. Acta. Vol. 37.  pp. 2043-2073.

                                     117

-------
Stumm, W.  1966.  Redox potential as an environmental paramter:   Conceptual
    significance and operational limitation.  3rd Intl. Conf. on  Water
    Pollut. Res.  Munich, Germany, Paper No. 13.  pp. 283-308.

Stumm, W. and J.J. Morgan.  1970.  Aquatic chemistry.  J. Wiley,  N.Y.

Thorstenson, D.C.  1970.  Equilibrium distribution of small organic mole-
    cules in natural waters.  Geochim. et. Cosmochim. Acta. 34.   pp. 745-
    770.

Trask, P.O.  1939.  Organic content of recent marine sediments.  Jjn Recent
    Marine Sediments.  P.O. Trask (Ed.).  Dover Publications, N.Y., 1968.
    pp. 428-453.

Wagman, D.O., W.H. Evans, V.B.  Parker, I.  Halow, Bailey, and R.H. Schumann.
    1968.  Selected values of chemical thermodynamic properties.  NBS Tech.
    Note 270-3.   National Bureau of Standards,  Washington, D.C.

Weiller, R.R.  1972.  The composition of the interstitial water of sediments
    in the Central Basin of Lake Erie.  Unpublished report.  Canada Centre
    for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.

Weiss, R.F.  1970.  The solubility of nitrogen, oxygen and argon  in water
    and seawater.  Deep Sea Research 17.  pp. 721-735.

Yamamoto, S., J.B. Alcauskas and T.E. Crozier.   1976.  Solubility of methane
    in distilled water and seawater.  J. Chem.  Engr. Data 21(1).  pp.  78-80.
                                     118

-------
                                 APPENDIX A



              FINITE DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS AND SOLUTION METHOD
Mass Transport Equation:





    d   '  -13 w. a.,  A. -
                                      dA.
                          1-1
                               Ei aik
<=1,...,NC   (AI)
where:   A.J  = i    fast reactant species concentration, 1=1,...,Nfs



        Si  = i    species source due to the slow reactants
        ai|< = stoichiometric coefficient of kul component, B|<, in the i

              species



        wi  = itn species sedimentation velocity



        Ei  = i   species diffusion coefficient



        z   = depth, positive downward.





Finite Difference Equation:   For modes located at z1, z2,...,zM+2 with
                                                                        1
spacing hn = zn+l - zn:
i
H
1=1
n+1 .n+1 , .n n n-1 An-l I n
aik ci Ai + aik di Ai + aik ei Ai - sk
*• ' k
n

= 0
= 1,
= 2,
                                                                          (A2)
 u         n+1
where:     c.
               Ei
                       n-
                                        - Bn 2 WV
                                    'i      i    i
                                    119

-------
               Nfs

           " = I   a, Sf (hn-] + hn)/2
           k   .=1  IK 1
                         , the finite difference weights for  the  velocity
                 "+2
              , E2, the velocity and diffusion evaluated  at  the midpoint
           1     ]    between zn and zn+1.
Perturbation Equation:  For estimates Bj, j=l,---,Nc; n=2,---,N+l,  at the N

                        interior nodes and the boundary conditions  at n=l

                        and n=N+2, evaluate equation (A2) yielding  the

                        errors el"!.  To compute correction 6B1?, to the esti-

                               n                            ^
                        mates Blj, solve:
                               J


    NC [      Nfs                     Nfs



   
-------
    Nf s          ( = o    k y j
    z   aik J?j
    i=l  1K  1J  I = 1    k = j

solve equation (A3) for B1? = - 6B1? as the initial estimate.
                         0       J
Newton-Raphson Iteration:  Using B^U) as the £th approximation, and an
                                  J
                           chemical equilibria calculation to obtain An im-

                           plied by the B"l(£), the residual errors are

                           evaluated using equation (A2).  Equation (A3) is

                           solved, using the appropriate Jacobians, to ob-

                           tain SB1], the corrections.  These are used to
                                  \J
                           produce the (£+l)tn approximation:
                                           n=2,...,N+l                  (A6)

where 0 < p < 1 is the relaxation parameter which is chosen small enough to
insure convergence and non-negative Bn(£) for the appropriate components.
Convergence achieved when:           ^


    |5B"U)/B"U)| <1Q-4                                                (A7)
       J     J

for approximately 0.01% error.
                                     121

-------
                                 SECTION 7

    SIMULATION OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF POLLUTED WATER  IN  RESERVOIRS  FROM
                           CONCENTRATED EMISSIONS

                   A.V- Karaushev and V.V. Romanovskiy1


    Perceptible currents may be absent during certain periods  of  time  in
areas of lakes and large reservoirs where waste waters have  been  emitted,
thus allowing pollutants to accumulate in the region of  the  emissions.  As a
result of turbulence, the polluted water is moved by the  surrounding waters.
Movement of patches (clouds) of the pollutant occurs both as a result  of
emissions of new portions of waste waters and due to turbulent diffusion.

    The process of diffusion of pollutants can be simulated  on the  basis of
an equation for turbulent diffusion in cylindrical coordinates (Karaushev,
1969).  In essence, this equation is written for the case of a concentrated
emission, but it can also be used for dispersive emissions of  relatively
small length scales as a first approximation, especially  in  the case of an
emission into a large, deep reservoir.  It is arbitrarily assumed that
emission of the entire discharge of waste waters takes place through one
central opening located in the center of the coordinates.  The equation de-
scribes the process of diffusion of a dissolved substance in the  plane  of
the surface of the reservoir; the concentration is assumed to  be  invariant
with respect to angular position.

    The method of calculating the diffusion in reservoirs, developed in the
State Hydrological Institute (SHI) based on an equation  for  diffusion  in
cylindrical coordinates, is reported as a first approach  (Karaushev, 1969),
and as a more refined approach (Karaushev, 1979).  The case  of an emission
of a non-conservative substance into a reservoir, whose  decomposition  takes
place according to a first order reaction, is considered  in  the new, refined
approach.

    The differential equation for turbulent diffusion in  cylindrical coordi-
nates for a non-conservative substance is written as follows:



            r§ £ * V= - ti .                                            «>
''State Hydrological Institute, Vtoraya liniya, dom 23,  199053  Leningrad,
 USSR.

                                     122

-------
Here, as previously, c is the concentration  of  the  pollutant  in the water
(kg/m3); t is the time (s); D is the turbulent  diffusion  coefficient
(m^/s); r denotes the distance from the  center  (from the  source of pollu-
tion); alternatively, this is the radius  (m)  of a circle  or sector of pollu-
tion limited by an arc coinciding with the  isopleth of  concentration c;  k^
is a coefficient (1/s) which accounts for the non-conservation  of the sub-
stance; it is assumed that on decomposition  of  the  substance  kn < 0, and
when the amount of the substance increases  due  to internal processes in  the
reservoir, k^ > 0.  For conserved substance,  kn=0,  and  the third term in
the left part of the equation is thus eliminated.
    Parameter 3 is expressed by the equality:

            R
    3 = D -
             cm
(2)
where Rcm is the discharge of waste waters  (m3/s);  H  is  the  mean  depth
of the reservoir (m) in the  area of the discharge  and  diffusion of  the  waste
waters;  is the angle of distribution of the  waste waters from the focal
source expressed in radians:   =  TT for emission at the  shore; $  =  ZTT for
emission at a significant distance from the  shore.

    The method of finite differences  is one  of the  simplest  approaches  for
applying equation (1) for practical calculations.   This  method is examined
below.

    In calculating turbulent diffusion, radius r is transformed into calcu-
lated elements (rings or semi-rings)  Ar.  The  ordinal  number of element Ar,
calculated from the center of the  coordinates, is  designated by n.   The
values of Ar, n and r are related  by  the correlation:
              1
               ) Ar.
(3)
Adjacent to the center, the element  (where  r  =  0)  has  the  number  n  =  1.

    Figure 1 shows the calculated grid  in sector    of  the  pollutant diffu-
sion zone.  The values for the concentration  of the pollutant  in  each sec-
tion of the grid at a given instant  in  time t = t-j  and at  the  following
instant t = t-j+i = t-j + At are indicated in the figure.  For a given
instant in time, we have the following  values of the concentrations:
Cj n_-| (in section n-1), C-j>n+i  (in  section n+1).   For the following
(calculated) interval of time in calculated section n, we  have the
concentration C-j+i>n (see Figure 1).
    The calculated equation is written as:
                                 +MnCi,n+l  '
(4)
                                      123

-------
Figure 1.   Diagram for  calculating  the diffusion of  pollutants  in
                       an  aquatic ecosystem.
                                124

-------
    Coefficients n, vn and Mn are first calculated  according  to  the
formulas shown below.  The first one is a constant,  and the other  two  vary
with the length of radius r with respect to the  increase  in the  section  num-
ber n.

    n = i . 2D ^ + kH At,                                              (5)
               Ar
    vn '  5-                                                 (6>
    Mn '
    Equation (1) describes a non-stationary process of diffusion, developing
in time t.  The dilution is calculated according to formula  (4) with re-
spect to the boundary and initial conditions.  The absence of pollution
within the limits of the entire calculated area, or some constant for the
range of the concentration of the pollutant, e.g., corresponding to the
natural (basal) concentration, is used as the initial condition.

    It is convenient to express the concentration in excess  over the natural
concentration level in calculating the pollution.  The boundary condition  is
written for the first section of the calculated grid (i.e.,  for the first
element adjacent to the center) in the form of the following material
balance equation:

     R                  2                  k
      cm ir     r \ - Ar  8C   rW^c\  A».    H ^ r
         (Ccm - Cr) - T §1 ' ^ar'r Ar ' T Ar  Cl
where Cr and (^)r are respectively the values of the concentration and the

derivative at distance  r from the center of the coordinates; C]  is the
mean concentration in the first calculated section.

    The concentration in the first section for each interval of time At
calculated, including the initial one, is calculated according to the fol-
lowing formula derived from Equation (8):


    CH1,1 =aCcm + bCi,l+dcl,2>                                      (9)


where Cj \ and C-j 2 are respectively the mean values of the concentra-
tion in the first'and second sections in the interval of time preceding the
calculated interval.

    The coefficients contained in formula (9) are calculated as follows:

                                     125

-------
               At
    b = l .         - 2D     + kH At,                                    (11)
                 r       Ar

                 p
           At     cm At
     .   9n
    d = 2D — * - TIT- — ?•
             2   *"    2
                     AT

    Note that as the material decomposes, kn  becomes  negative;  for this
reason, the term containing RH in formulas  (5)  and  (11)  is  also negative.
When k^ is positive, this term is also positive.

    The calculation begins with the fact that the area of possible diffusion
of pollutants from the source, which is set at  the  center of this area, is
estimated based on general considerations.  Depth H is based on the data
from measurements, and the mean coefficient for the turbulent diffusion D
for the entire area is calculated.  D is calculated according to a formula
which best fits the conditions in the reservoir considered.   The arguments
contained in the formulas for diffusion coefficient D are assumed to be
average for the entire area of diffusion of pollutants.   The size of the
calculated segment of radius Ar is indicated  in consideration of the condi-
tion:


    H±Ar=mR3,ex»                                                   <13>


where rn = 20 + 30, and R3>ex is tne expected  value  of the radius of the
area of diffusion of polluted water in the  reservoir.

    The method of calculation examined here has limited  applications; it can
only be used for those cases where D _> - 3, which is  equivalent to the in-
equality:

    Rcml2
-------
these values.  Correct calculation of  the  coefficients  is  verified according
to the conditions:
                -kHAt =
                                                         (16)
    a + b + d -
kR At
(17)
    All coefficients should be calculated with  high  precision  so  that  the
deviations from unity in control formulas (16)  and  (17)  do  not  exceed  0.001.
Condition (16) should be fulfilled for each  element  n.

    The sequence of calculating the field of the  concentration  is  as fol-
lows:  the concentration in the 1st section  is  first  calculated according to
formula (9), then the concentration in the 2nd, 3rd,  etc. sections  is  cal-
culated according to formula  (4) up to the end  of the area  of  diffusion  of
the pollutants obtained by calculation,  i.e., up  to  the  section where  the
calculation will produce C =  0.  The next calculated  interval  is  then  con-
sidered, and the calculations are done in the same order.   The  area of dif-
fusion of pollutants is increased by one step of  Ar  for  each interval  of
time.  The calculations for the case of  diffusion of  a conservative sub-
stance in the reservoir are done by the  same method,  taking into  considera-
tion the fact that in this case, kn = 0.

    The calculation for a conservative substance  must be verified  based  on
the substance balance.  The mass of the  substance, ^pol^' entering  the re-
servoir through the emission  considered for the entire period  calculated,
      i
t. =  I  At, is first calculated.
    Calculation of the diffusion allows obtaining the  values of  the  concen-
tration in each nth section.  After calculating the volume of  each section
and multiplying it by the corresponding concentration, the mass  of the  sub-
stance in the elements is found.

    In adding the mass of the substance in all elements, the total mass  in
the zone of diffusion of the substance is determined.  It is obvious that
the total mass of the substance at time tj should be equal to  Tp0l,j-

    If the sums do not coincide and errors are found,  then the values of the
concentration obtained are correspondingly equal to the value  of the error.
After the appropriate correction is made, the calculation can  be continued
in the normal order.   Monitoring and corrections can be performed re-
peatedly.

    Note that the composition of these values in calculations  for non-con-
servative substances  should produce an inequality which expresses the
natural  processes of  the decomposition of the substance due to the physio-
logical  or biological processes which take place in the reservoir.   In  this
case,  the calculation is not verified by the method examined above.
                                       127

-------
    The calculations are made for the entire period when there  are  no  uni-
directional currents capable of carrying the polluted water  beyond  the
limits of the area affected by the emissions, i.e., for periods of  calm,  or
a period of stable ice on the surface water.
REFERENCES

Karaushev, A.V.  1969.  River hydraulics.  Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad.  416
    P-

Karaushev, A.V.  1979.  A model and a calculated solution to the problem of
    diffusion in reservoirs.   Proc. of the VI All-Union Symposium on Con-
    temporary Problems in Self-Purification of Reservoirs and Water Quality
    Control.  Tallin,  p. 45-47.
                                     128

-------
                                 SECTION 8

         RESULTS OF A JOINT USA/USSR HYDRODYNAMIC MODELING PROJECT
                              FOR LAKE BAIKAL

      John F. Paull, Alexandr B. Gorstko? and Anton A. Matveyev3


INTRODUCTION

    The United States of America (U.S.A.) and Union of Soviet Socialist Re-
public (U.S.S.R.) are confronted with many environmental problems which can
affect the health and welfare of their respective societies.  Expanding pop-
ulations and industries, and increasing urbanization and farming have re-
sulted in alterations to the hydrosphere and to changes in loads of waste
materials which effect the quality of the environment.  The mutual concern
for the environment provided the impetus for the U.S.A./U.S.S.R. Agreement
on Cooperation in the Field of Environmental Protection signed in 1972.

    As part of the Agreement, Project 02.02-12, Protection and Management of
Water Quality in Lakes and Estuaries, was initiated.  Although the two na-
tions share no common boundaries on any lake or estuary, they do share a
common concern for water quality preservation, and the need to understand
the physical, chemical, and biological processes that effect and determine
water quality.  To share scientific knowledge on limnological processes, a
joint modeling project was initiated during the exchange visit by Soviet
representatives to the U.S.A. in 1976.

    In June 1977, Dr. Tudor T. Davies from U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Environmental Research Laboratory, Gulf Breeze, Florida, and
Dr. John F. Paul and Mr. William L. Richardson from EPA, Large Lakes
Research Station, Grosse lie, Michigan, visited the Institute of Mechanics
and Applied Mathematics, Rostov State University, Rostov-on-Don, U.S.S.R.
They met with Drs. A.A. Zenin, A.A. Matveyev, A.B. Gorstko and F.A. Surkov.
During this visit, the details of the joint modeling project were arranged,
and a project report outline prepared.  As a first step, it was agreed to
 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Large Lakes Research Station, Grosse
 lie, Michigan 48138, USA.
Institute of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics, Rostov State University,
 192/2 Stachky Prospect, 344090 Rostov-on-Don, USSR.
3Hydrochemical Institute, 192/3 Stachky Prospect, 344090 Rostov-on-Don,
 USSR.
                                    129

-------
compare formulations and results of hydrodynamic  and  transport models devel-
oped by the two groups.  The objective was  to  provide a  basis  for further
verification of lakewide and nearshore hydrodynamic  and  transport models.

    This paper describes the application of a  hydrodynamic  model, previously
developed for and applied to areas of the Great Lakes, to Lake Baikal in the
U.S.S.R.  The model results are compared to available field and remotely
sensed data.
BACKGROUND ON LAKE BAIKAL

    The basin of Lake Baikal is located almost centrally  in  Asia,  in a very
rugged mountain province in south Siberia, the Baikal  Region.   The charac-
teristic geomorphological features of the region  include  medium and high
mountain ranges extending over 1500 km in the southwest to northeast direc-
tion, and an alternation of ridges and trenches,  the  largest of which is
filled with waters of the lake.

    Lake Baikal is the oldest and deepest intracontinental body of water  in
the world.  The formation of the Baikal trench began  about 30  million years
ago.  The watershed area of the lake is 0.54 million  km2, and  the  area of
the lake itself is 31.5 thousand km2.  The length of  the  lake  is 636 km;
maximum width, 79 km; minimum width, 25 km; maximum depth, 1620 m; and
volume of the water mass, about 23 thousand km3.  The  topography of the lake
is shown in Figure 1.  The trench of Lake Baikal  is divided  into three
basins, of which the middle one is the deepest.   It is separated from the
southern basin by the Selenga shallows, a delta formed by the  lake's largest
tributary, the Selenga River.  The contribution of the Selenga amounts to
about 50% of the total runoff into the lake.  Table 1  provides an  annual
average water balance for the lake (Vikulina and  Kashinova 1973).

     TABLE 1.  ANNUAL AVERAGE WATER BALANCE FOR LAKE  BAIKAL  DURING THE
                        PERIOD 1901-1970 (km3/year)
     Inflow
           Outflow
Precipitation              9.29
Condensation on lake
   surface                   .82
River inflow              58.75
Groundwater inflow         2.30

Total                     71.16
Runoff to Angara River     60.39
Evaporation                10.77
Total                      71.16
    Lake Baikal contains approximately 4/5 of the total  surface  water  re-
serves of the U.S.S.R.  However, the importance of the  lake  does not  end
there.  During the past approximately 1 million years,  when  this body  of
water was formed in its present boundaries, special  characteristics were
developed:  low solute content, high transparency, low  temperature, and
high saturation with dissolved oxygen.

                                      130

-------
                                             UPPER ANGARA
                           NIZHNEANGARSK.,i/i'M
(Depth contours expressed in meters.)
 Figure  1.   Lake  Baikal
              131

-------
    Lake Baikal's ecosystem is distinct  and  closely balanced.  In the course
of its evolution, its organisms have adapted  to  conditions  varying little
with time, and have reacted very sensitively  to  changes  in  these conditions.
Indicative of this sensitivity is the fact that  organisms of the open deep-
water parts of the lake do not dwell in  the  shallow regions near the Selenga
delta, which are subjected to the action of the  river  runoff.
HYDRODYNAMIC MODEL

    This model is composed of two components:  the  basic  hydrodynamic cal-
culation and the transport of dissolved and/or suspended  material.   Each
component will be discussed separately.

Summary of Hydrodynamic Component

    The equations for the hydrodynamic component  are  derived  from the time-
dependent, three-dimensional equations for conservation of  mass,  momentum
and energy.  The principal assumptions used are:

    (a)  The pressure is assumed to vary hydrostatically.

    (b)  The rigid-lid approximation is made, i.e., the vertical  velo-
         city at the undisturbed water surface is assumed to  be zero.
         This approximation is used to eliminate  surface  gravity
         waves and their associated small time scales, greatly in-
         creasing the maximum allowable time step in  the  numerical
         computations.

    (c)  Eddy coefficients are used to account for  the turbulent  diffu-
         sion effects.  The horizontal coefficients are assumed to  be
         constant, but the vertical coefficients  are  assumed  to be  some
         function of the local dependent variables.

The resulting equations are:

3u   9v   3w   n
9x + 9y + 35 = °»                                                       0)
         +     +       f   _    1  3P    3 .   8U
                       V   " P  3x   3x IAH 3l
   + _§ (A  ^) + — (A  —)


   + ^ + 3V2+ 9vw _ f   _    1 3P    3     3v,
      3x   3y +  3z   Tou * - ~ ~y + 9x (AH 3x'
                               o
                                     132

-------
     $ (AH I' + 5 <\ 1
3T .  3uT   3vT   3wT .  3 ,.  3T, .   3 ,R  3T>
3t    3X    3y   ~3Z " 3* l H jsx'   sy lbH 3y'
   * Tz  z/h(x,y).

    The boundary conditions used with the equations are the following:   the
bottom and shore are taken as no-slip, impermeable, no-flux surfaces;  in-
flows or outflows along with appropriate fluxes of heat are specified  at
rivers; at the water surface, a wind-dependent stress and a specified  heat
flux are specified.  The initial conditions used are either some  simple
                                     133

-------
specification for the variables  (e.g.,  zero)  or  specification of all vari-
ables from some previous calculation.

    The equations are put into finite-difference  form in both space and
time.  The spatial discretizing  is accomplished  by  integration of the dif-
ferential equations about appropriate grid  cells.   The  finite-difference
equations are explicit in time,  except  with respect  to  the Coriolis terms
and the vertical diffusion terms which  are  written  implicitly.  This is done
to eliminate the small vertical  diffusion time step  restriction and the in-
stability associated with explicit form of  the Coriolis terms.

    The equations as written can not be solved directly if the rigid-lid
condition is to be satisfied.  To develop a solution  scheme,  an additional
equation is derived directly from the other equations  and  the rigid-lid con-
dition.  This equation is derived by vertically  summing the two finite-dif-
ference equations for the horizontal velocities,  then  taking  the finite-dif-
ference analog of the divergence.  The  rigid-lid  condition is used along
with the vertically summed continuity and hydrostatic  pressure equations.
The result is a Poisson-type finite-difference equation in the surface pres-
sure.  The surface pressure is the "integration  constant"  resulting from the
vertical summation of the hydrostatic pressure equation.   The surface pres-
sure is a function of the horizontal coordinates.  This procedure for de-
riving the Poisson-type equation for the surface  pressure, a  modification  of
the SMAC procedure by Amsden and Harlow (1970),  is different  than previous
models which first derived the pressure equation  from  the  differential equa-
tion, then discretized it (Paul  and Lick 1974, Paul  1976). The distinction
between these two procedures is  that with the use of  the  latter, the finite-
difference equation that results for the pressure will  not necessarily be
directly deriveable from the finite-difference forms  of the horizontal
momentum equations.  This is strictly a numerical error associated with ap-
proximating the differential equations; however,  this  error reflects in the
inability of the numerical solution to  satisfy the rigid-lid  condition to  an
acceptable degree.  Even if direct methods  are used  to  solve  the finite-dif-
ference pressure equation or if  an iterative  procedure  is  used with strin-
gent convergence criteria, errors are manifested  in  the vertical velocity at
the rigid lid.  These errors are not always small, especially in problems
where there is significant differences  in depths  between the  shallow and
deep areas of the water body.  These errors might not  appear  to be of much
significance in some calculations, but  they do create  appreciable errors
when the resultant velocities are used  to calculate  dispersion of substances
in the body of water.  Also, if  advantage is  taken of  the  time implicit na-
ture of the vertical diffusion terms (i.e., time  steps  are large with re-
spect to the explicit vertical diffusion time limit),  these errors become
large and ultimately make the solutions meaningless.   Complete details of
this numerical procedure appear  in the  report by  Paul  and  Lick (1980).

Summary of Dispersion Component

    The transport and dispersion of material  in  the  turbulent flow will be
described in a manner similar to that used for the  transport  and turbulent
dispersion of heat and momentum.  Refer to  Sheng  (1975) for a summary of
this procedure.  The concentrations of  the material  to  be  dispersed are

                                     134

-------
treated as continuous on the  length scales  considered.   The  concentrations
are sufficiently small so that they do not  significantly alter  the density
of the water (the momentum equations can  be solved  independently), and they
function as completely conservative substances  in the water  column convected
with the local fluid velocities.  The only  exception to  the  latter condition
will be when gravitational settling is important for the material  con-
sidered.  In this situation,  the vertical convection of  the  material  is en-
hanced by a settling velocity.  The basic equation  used  to predict the dis-
persion of the material is:

3C + 3(Cu) + 3(Cv) ^ 3(Cw) _   3 fn  3C,
O.4"    <% »/
01.    OA

            3n./"*
        / n  0
-------
      TABLE 2.  PARAMETERS FOR LAKE BAIKAL HYDRODYNAMIC MODEL
Grid spacings
Horizontal extents
                 15 km   y-direction
                 7.8 km  x-direction

                 600 km  y-direction

150 km  x-direction
Number of grid points



Minimum depth

Maximum depth

Coriolis parameter (53° N)

Horizontal eddy viscosity

Vertical eddy viscosity

Surface wind stress

Wind directions:

     Case 1
     Case 2
     Case 3
     Case 4

River flows:

     Selenga
     Barguzin
     Upper Angara
     Angara

Horizontal eddy diffusivity

Vertical eddy diffusivity

Particle settling velocity

where:

     h   =  local depth
     h0  =  reference depth
                 41       y-direction
                 21       x-direction
                  8       z-direction

                 10  m

                 1620 m

                 1.16xlO-4/sec

                 107 cm2/sec

                 3.85 (1  + 258.7 -^ cm2/sec
                                 no
                 1 dyne/cm2
                 Southwest
                 Northeast
                 Northwest
                 Southeast
                 9.64x1O8 cm3/sec
                 4.10xl08 cnvVsec
                 5.78x1O8 cm3/sec
                 19.52xl03 cm3/sec

                 106 cm2/sec

                 .385 (1 + 258.7 Jl) cm3/sec
                                 ho
                 10 m/day
                                 136

-------
FREQUENCY OF FALL WINDS (PERCENT):

       FROM LEFT SIDE (NW)     FROM RIGHT
                              SIDE (SE)
UP LAKE (SW)   DOWN LAKE (NE)   FREQUENCY
                              OF CALM
FREQUENCY OF SUMMER WINDS (PERCENT):

       FROM LEFT SIDE (NW)     FROM RIGHT
                             SIDE (SE)
UP LAKE (SW)   DOWN LAKE (NE)   FREQUENCY
                              OF CALM
 Figure 2.   Frequency  of winds over Lake Baikal  in the  summer and autumn.
                                       137

-------
time were not obtainable  during  the  course  of  this  study.  Since an insuffi-
cient amount of  data was  available on  the thermal  regime for the entire
lake, the calculations were  performed  assuming this  aspect to be negligible.
The wind direction for Case  1, from  the  southwest,  was also used in a cal-
culation with the northern basin of  the  lake  ice  covered.  This type of cal-
culation is of interest to assess the  significance  of the ice cover on the
central and southern basins.  The northern  basin  is  generally ice covered
through the middle of May, and occasionally until the beginning of June
(Anonymous 1969).

    Detailed results of the  hydrodynamic calculations are presented in Paul,
Richardson, Gorstko, and  Matveyev (1979).   Representative results will be
discussed here.  All of the  calculations were  performed for 12 days of real
time, after which essentially steady-state  conditions were obtained.   Fi-
gures 3 and 4 show the surface velocities and  vertically integrated velo-
cities for the southwest  wind (Case  1) and  the northwest wind (Case 3).   For
all of the calculations,  the results are typical  of  what might be expected
from the simple  theory of motion which balances foriolis force,  vertical
friction, and horizontal  pressure gradients.   The deep areas of the lake  are
generally characterized by geostrophic motion,  while the shallower areas  are
markedly influenced by vertical  friction.   The magnitude and directions of
the surface currents indicate the different balances in the motion as  one
goes from shallow to deep waters.  The general  circulation of the lake is
composed of the  basic circulation in the three basins.   Because  the northern
and southern basins are relatively flat  in  their  long dimension  compared
with the central basin, the magnitude of the vertically integrated velo-
cities for the southwest  wind are smaller in these  basins compared to  the
central basin.   This is in agreement with the  steady-state solutions  ob-
tained for simple basins  by Gedney (1971).  He solved the equations which
balance Coriolis force, pressure gradients, and vertical  friction.   For con-
stant depth basins, the steady-state vertically integrated velocities  are
everywhere equal to zero, while  for  parabolic  shaped basins, the vertically
integrated velocities form two rotating  gyres,  with  the magnitudes dependent
on the degree of the bottom slopes.  Thus,  the gyres in the calculations  for
the vertically integrated velocities are functions of the local  topography.
Differences are  apparent for the different  wind direction calculations, but
this is because  the basins are elongated and the  topography is highly vari-
able.

    Data on surface currents in  the  Selenga region  are shown in  Figure 5.
Three cases are  shown:  prevailing southwesterly winds,  prevailing north-
westerly winds,  and steady-last ing northwesterly winds.   The first two are
separated by only a day,  and it  is apparent that the currents on the  second
day show the effects of the previous day's  winds.  This can be seen by com-
paring the second and third plot.  The currents in the third plot compare
quite well  with  the surface current  calculation for  the northwesterly wind
(Figure 4).  The first plot compares reasonably well  with the calculation
for the southwesterly wind (Figure 3), but  discrepancies do exist,  appar-
ently a function of the transitory behavior of  the currents.  The second
plot appears to  be some combination  of the  two  calculations, as  would be  ex-
pected.
                                     138

-------
                         N
                                          o
  SCALE:
	1	
    100
KILOMETERS
200   15 CM/SEC
CO
UD
                          WIND
              SURFACE VELOCITIES
              Figure 3a. Hydrodynamic model calculation for Lake Baikal with southwest wind.

-------
          N
           WIND
                          0
  SCALE:
	1	\
    100      200
KILOMETERS
                      HiliV^'   |

VERTICALLY INTEGRATED VELOCITIES
Figure 3b.  Hydrodynamic model calucation for Lake Baikal with southwest wind.

-------
            N
                 v
                WIND
                                   SCALE:
0        100       200  15 CM/SEC
     KILOMETERS
 SURFACE VELOCITIES
Figure 4a.  Hydrodynamic model calculation for Lake Baikal with northwest wind

-------
                         N
                              v
                            WIND
  SCALE:

	1	
    100
 KILOMETERS
                                                            200
ro
             VERTICALL Y INTEGRA TED VELOCITIES
             Figure 4b,  Hydrodynamic model  calculation for Lake Baikal with northwest wind.

-------
CO
                                                        WIND
                                                       WIND
                                                (1) Prevailing southwesterly wind (30 Aug 1972).
                                                (2) Prevailing northwesterly wind (31 Aug 1972).
                                                (3) Steady lasting northwesterly wind (8 Sep 1972).
                  Figure 5.   Observed surface currents  in the  Selenga River Region of Lake Baikal

-------
    The only data for  lake-wide currents  is  a  plot  which  appears in the
Baikal Atlas (Figure 6).  This  is depicted as  representative of the typical
currents that exist in the lake.  With reference  to the wind frequency plot
for the lake (Figure 2), it can be seen that for  the most -part, the winds
from the southwest are the most typical.  A  comparison  of  the data plot (Fi-
gure 6) with the vertically integrated velocities calculated for a southwest
wind (Figure 3) indicates a very good agreement.  The observed gyres are re-
plicated quite well in the calculation.   The data plot  does  not indicate
magnitude of the currents so no comparisons  can be  made on  this aspect.

    Using the steady-state currents that  were  calculated,  the transport and
dispersion of material in the lake were calculated.   A  series of 8 calcula-
tions were performed:  for each of the four main wind directions,  for
material which is neutrally buoyant and for material  which  has a gravita-
tional settling velocity of 10 meters per day.  This  settling velocity cor-
responds with the mean Stokes settling velocity for  the predominant particle
sizes observed in the suspended material  in the Selenga River runoff.   The
two calculations for each current pattern indicate  the  difference  in distri-
butions that can be achieved when one considers dissolved material  (neu-
trally buoyant) and suspended material (positive settling  velocity).   The
parameters used for the calculations are  listed in  Table 2.   The calcula-
tions were performed for 28 days of real  time  for each  circumstance.   Mate-
rial was entered continuously during the  calculation  through the Selenga,
Barguzin and Upper Angara Rivers.  The material concentration in each  river
was set equal to 1.0.  Since the transport equations  are linear in  the mate-
rial concentration, the actual concentration level  is not  important in the
calculation.  The results for all the calculations  are presented in Paul,
Richardson, Gorstko, and Matveyev (1979).  Representative  results  will  be
discussed here.  Figure 7 indicates surface and bottom concentrations  with a
southwest wind for both neutrally buoyant and  suspended material.   The ef-
fect of the settling velocity on the concentration  distributions is impor-
tant.  The main reason for this is that the currents  over  the water column
are, in general, going in different directions.   If  the material remains es-
sentially uniform over the water column (i.e., for  the  neutrally buoyant
material), then the material is primarily transported by the currents  over
the upper portion of the water column.  These  are the currents which have
the larger magnitude.  When gravitational settling  is introduced,  the
material tends to concentrate near the bottom, and  thus, is  transported
horizontally by the currents that are near the bottom.  Since these cur-
rents are in generally in a different direction than  the near surface
currents, the concentration distribution  appears different.

    The data that is available for comparison  with  the  calculations are
shown in Figure 8.  These data are taken  from  the Hydromet  cruise  in the
Selenga River Region of the lake on 28-29 May  1976.   The plots are  for P04
(a dissolved substance) and total suspended solids.   The winds over the re-
gion were highly variable during the cruise, ranging  from  southwest to
southeast during the first part of the cruise, and  to northeast during the
final part of the cruise.  A reasonable comparison  can  be  made with the cal-
culations for the southwest wind (Figure  7).   The currents  in the  vicinity
of the Selenga delta are easterly near the surface  and  over  the most of the
vertical column near the river area of the lake.  As  one goes away from the

                                    144

-------
SLYUDYANKA
                                                         UST' BARGUZIN
          Figure 6.  Lake Baikal whole lake dominant currents.
                                  145

-------
                                              SCALE:
                CONCENTRA TION
                 (PER VOLUME)

                   A 1.0000
                   B 0.1000
                   C 0.0100
                   D 0.0010
                   E 0.0001
    100
KILOMETERS
                                                            200
SURFACE CONCENTRATIONS (NO SETTLING VELOCITY)
       Figure 7a.  Dispersion model  calculation for Lake Baikal with southwest wind,

-------
                                              SCALE:
                CONCENTRATION
                 (PER VOLUME)

                    A 1.0000
                    B 0.1000
                    C 0.0100
                    D 0.0010
                    E 0.0001
                                    0
    100
KILOMETERS
BOTTOM CONCENTRA TIONS (NO SETTLING VELOCITY)
200
        Figure 7b.  Dispersion model calculation for Lake Baikal with southwest wind.

-------
CO
                                                      SCALE:
                        CONCENTRATION
                         (PER VOLUME)

                            A T.OOOO
                            B 0.1000
                            C 0.0100
                            D 0.0010
                            E 0.0001
                                             0
    100
KILOMETERS
200
       SURFACE CONCENTRATIONS (SETTLING VELOCITY, 10m/day)
               Figure 7c.  Dispersion model calculation for Lake Baikal with southwest wind,

-------
                                               SCALE:
                CONCENTRATION
                 (PER VOLUME)

                    A 1.0000
                    B 0.1000
                    C 0.0100
                    D 0.0010
                    E 0.0001
0
    100
KILOMETERS
200
BOTTOM CONCENTRATIONS (SETTLING VELOCITY, 10m/day)
         Figure 7d.  Dispersion model calculation for Lake Baikal with southwest wind.

-------
en
O
              NEAR SURFACE CONTOURS OF

              P0~3, mg/l


              IMPLIED FLOW OF MATERIAL
          Figure 8a.  Sample results from Hydromet cruise in Selenga Shallows on 28-29 May 1976.

-------
    NEAR SURFACE CONTOURS OF
      SUSPENDED SOLIDS, mg/l
    IMPLIED FLOW OF MATERIAL
Figure 8b.  Sample results from Hydromet cruise in Selenga Shallows on 28-29 May 1976,

-------
river area, the subsurface currents  are  generally southwesterly.  The sus-
pended solids settle out as they enter the  lake  and are transported by the
near-bottom currents.  The dissolved material  remains  nearly uniform verti-
cally, and is transported out  into the lake  by the subsurface currents.  The
data generally agree with the  calculated  distributions.

    Additional data available  for the Selenga  region  is the Landsat satel-
lite image shown in Figure 9.  This  image records observations of 9 July
1975.  Unfortunately, no wind  information was  available for this date.   The
image does indicate the same sort of suspended solids  pattern as was ob-
served during the 28-29 May 1976 Hydromet cruise  (Figure 8).


DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION

    The work summarized in this paper represents  just  a preliminary step in
a possible comprehensive joint modeling  and  field study by scientists from
our two countries.  It is hoped that the  work  discussed here  will  continue
and that this continued work will enable  scientists from both countries to
expand their knowledge of the  physical process in lakes.

    It is recommended that a comprehensive joint  USA/USSR modeling and  field
survey program be initiated for a lake such  as Lake Baikal.   This  program
would be used to both verify the models  and  increase the  understanding  of
the processes at work in the lake.  Modeling work already underway,  along
with information available from previous  field surveys, would be used to
plan an extensive one year field survey.  The  information that would be
available from satellites (for example,  LANDSAT and NIMBUS) would  be
utilized.  The usefulness of the satellite imagery to  characterize suspended
solids in lakes, in conjunction with field data and modeling  results, has
been demonstrated by Sydor and Oman  (1977);  Sydor,  Stortz,  and Swain (1978);
and Paul, Mielnik, and Shute (1979).  The satellite provides  synoptic infor-
mation on a whole lake basin, while the  survey ships provide  information at
different depths in the lake and can provide ground-truth for the  satellite
information.   Such a program would cover  a period of three  years:   the  first
year for preparation, the second year for the  field surveys,  and the third
year for the analysis.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    This work could not have been undertaken without  the  sponsorship of  the
former coordinators for the Lakes and Estuaries Project,  Drs.  T.T.  Davies
and A.A. Zenin.

    Dr. Michael Sydor, University of Minnesota-Duluth,  provided  the Landsat
satellite image.
                                     152

-------
  Ei86-0e                          Eie?-8ei           N8S3-38;
C N5«-22'Eie?-27 N N5«-2l/E 107-3" nSS 5    R SUN EL52 R2I38 l95-233<>-«- : -N-? 2i
  iEiee-ee
a9JUL75 C N52-57/ElB6-«3 N
                                         iEie?-
                                                                          c'r •" ^ a? ?:• If
                                  5    R SUN EL53 flZl36 l*>-233"-B- 1 -N-0-2L  oS        2^ 68-83 Jg-!
        Figure  9.   LANDSAT satellite  image  of Lake  Baikal
                                         153

-------
REFERENCES

Amsden, A.A. and F.H. Harlow.  1970.  The SMAC method:   A  numerical  techni-
    que for calculating incompressible fluid flows.   Los Alamos  Scientific
    Laboratory, Report No. LA-4370, Los Alamos, New Mexico.

Anonymous.  1969.  Atlas of Baikal.  Govt. Dept.  Geodosy  and  Cartography.
    Irkutsk and Moscow.

Crowley, W.P.  1968.  A global numerical ocean model:   Part  1. J.  Computa-
    tional Physics, 3: 111-147.

Gedney, R.T.  1971.  Numerical calculations of the wind-driven currents  in
    Lake Erie.  NASA TM X-52985.

Paul, J.F. and W.J. Lick.  1974.  A numerical model for thermal  plumes and
    river discharges.  Proc.  17th Conf. Great Lakes Res.,  I.A.G.L.R., pp.
    445-455.

Paul, J.F.  1976.  Modeling the hydrodynamic effects  of  large man-made modi-
    fications to lakes.  Proc. of the EPA Conf. on Environmental Modeling
    and Simulation (W.R. Ott, ed.), EPA-600/9-76-016, pp.  171-175.

Paul, J.F- and R.L. Patterson.  1977.  Hydrodynamic simulation of movement
    of larval fishes in western Lake Erie and their vulnerability to power
    plant entrainment.  Proceedings of the 1977 Winter Simulation Conference
    (H.J. Highland, R.G. Sargent and J.W. Schmidt, ed.), WSC Executive Com-
    mittee, pp.  305-316.

Paul, J.F. and W.J. Lick.  1980.  Numerical model for three-dimensional
    variable-density, rigid-lid hydrodynamic flows:   Vol.  1, details of the
    numerical model.  Report  in preparation.

Paul, J.F., R.A. Mielnik, and P.A. Shute.  1979.  Use of LANDSAT imagery to
    characterize the suspended solids in Lake Baikal.  Project report for
    Remote Sensing of Earth Resources, Eastern Michigan University.

Paul, J.F., W.L. Richardson,  A.B. Gorstko, and A.A. Matveyev.  1979.  Re-
    sults of a joint U.S.A./U.S.S.R. hydrodynamic and transport modeling
    project.  EPA-600/3-79-015.

Semenov, A.E., ed.  1972.  Hydrometeorological investigations of the
    southern seas and Atlanta Ocean.  Collected Works of the Laboratory of
    the Southern Seas, Volume 11.  Moscow.

Sheng, Y.-Y. P.   1975.  The wind-driven currents and  contaminant dispersion
    in the near-shore of large lakes.  Lake Erie International Jetport
    Model Feasibility Investigation Report 17-5, Contract  Report H-75-1,
    U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station,  Vicksburg,  Miss.
                                     154

-------
Sydor,  M.  and  G.J.  Oman.   1977.   Effects on Nemadji runoff on Lake Superior,
    effects  of river inputs on the Great Lakes.  Dept. of Physics, Univ. of
    Minn.,  Duluth.

Sydor,  M.,  K.R. Stortz,  and W.R.  Swain.  1978.  Identification of contami-
    nants  in Lake Superior through LANDSAT 1 data.  J. Great Lakes Res.,
    4(2):  142-148.

Vikulina,  Z.A. and  T.D.  Kashinova.  1973.  Water balance of Lake Baikal..
    Trudy  GGI, Issue 203, pg.  268.  Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad.
                                      155

-------
                                 SECTION 9

      THE STRUCTURE OF HYDROCHEMICAL FIELDS AND SHORT-TERM PREDICTION

      A.M. Nikanorov, B.M. Vladimirskiy, V.L. Pavelko, Ye.V. Melnikov
                           and K.L. Botsenyuk^
INTRODUCTION

    The concept of the field presumes the existence of coordinated  indices
located in some predictable manner in space, and characterized by a set of
parameters which jointly fix the observed structure.

         "Thus, ... the system of a field refers to a system having
         the following properties.  It is a spatial unity, at least
         with respect to certain of its properties.  It is also a
         unity based on its interactions in the sense that it can
         be deformed only as a unit and that in relationship to
         certain significant ... peculiarities, a change in one por-
         tion of the field has a significant influence on changes
         of other parts.  It is an organized whole with definite
         integral manifestations and should be studied as a whole,
         not as the summary result of the combination of its parts
         and their activities" (Huxley 1935, cited by Waddington
         1948).

    The concept of the field structure of phenomena is supplemented with its
specific content in actual experiments, including observations and measure-
ments.  Based on these data, models of the phenomena are constructed which
then serve as the basis for development of corresponding theories by the
method of trail and error.  The predictive capabilities of models created on
the basis of accepted theories are obvious.  The accuracy of predictions
using these models increases as the corresponding theories are refined  and
expanded.  The desire, frequently the need, to predict phenomena which  do
not have corresponding theoretical interpretation or, consequently, models
based on them, makes it necessary to use empirical models for predictive
purposes.
^ydrochemical Institute, 192/3 Stachky Prospect, 344090 Rostov-on-Don,
 USSR.
                                     156

-------
    The construction of empirical models, reflecting information  concerning
the actual,  real  aspects of phenomena in a form convenient for use,  is  also
inseparable  from observations and experiments.  Thus, analysis of the struc-
ture of hydrochemical  fields and resulting empirical descriptions are in-
separably related both to the points of measurement selected, and to the
mathematical  apparatus used.  Naturally, the mathematical model incorporates
certain subjective and contradictory aspects, related to the selection  of
the specific  model, to the particular goal of modeling, and to the set  of
models with  which the  same result can be achieved.  It is this contradiction
which must be resolved as a result of introduction of the concept of the
field in the  creation  of empirical models.  Thus, the concept of  the field
in the analysis of hydrochemical information is used not as a causal princi-
pal, but rather as a method of analysis.


HYPOTHESES CONCERNING  THE STRUCTURE OF HYDROCHEMICAL FIELDS

    The results of factor and regression analysis presented in this  section
are based on  earlier published data (Zenin 1961).  From these results evolve
a number of statements which are of basic significance in both modeling the
structure of  hydrochemical fields, and in empirical prediction.

    The data  used represent the results of many years of measurement of a
number of hydrochemical indices in reservoirs along the Volga River  and its
tributaries.   In all,  some 30,000 measurements were used in the analysis.
The results  of factor  analysis are presented in Tables 1-7.  Analysis of the
results demonstrate several facts.  Both for the reservoirs and for  the
tributaries,  the factor solutions can be characterized by virtually  the same
set of factors.  Thus, it may be assumed that the same mechanisms  lie at the
basis of formation of  the assigned set of indices.  It should be  noted  that
the significance of individual factors (see the rows of "all factors" in
Tables 1-7)  changes, with one exception.  The significance of this change is
identical for all factors without exception.  Obviously, the remaining  fac-
tors reflect  the specific characteristics of the hydrochemical situation in
the reservoirs studied.  It is important for the modeling of the  structure
of a hydrochemical field based on the vectors of mean and covariation
matrices that the factor mapping remain constant, or that the internal  fac-
tors of the  covariance matrices and the variability of weights of the fac-
tors, the eigenvalues  of the covariation matrices, remain constant.

    The initial material used for analysis of the capabilities for empirical
prediction was made up of series of hydrochemical indices from three hydrau-
lic projects  over a period extending from 1951 through 1973.  It  should be
noted that the frequency of all data available was rather arbitrary.
Examples of  the time series of indices used for analysis are presented  in
Figure 1.  The results of factor analysis for these data are presented  in
Tables 8 and  9, and enable confirmation of the hypothesis developed  earlier
in our analysis of data on the Volga reservoirs.

    Regression models  were constructed in which the computational  procedure
used was step-by-step  regression.  A linear model for 6 and 13 indices
analyzed produced a high degree of agreement (see Figure 2).  Furthermore,

                                      157

-------
 TABLE 1.   FACTOR SOLUTION FOR THE RESULTS OF CHEMICAL  ANALYSIS OF WATER
               SAMPLES OF THE GORKY RESERVOIR IN  1954-1958
1
Level
ci-
sof'
HCO^ mg/liter
Na+ + K +
zi
cr
so2-
HCOg % eq.
Mg2+
Na+ + K+
Weight of f actor 1

2
-0.05
0.70
0.79
0.95
0.93
0.89
0.23
0.99
-0.07
-0.25
0.29
0.16
0.22
-0.26
2.24
Factor
3
0.01
0.68
0.16
-0.03
-0.06
0.02
-0.01
-0.03
-0.99
0.17
0.28
-0.06
0.02
0.04
1.26
Mapping Coefficient
4
0.00
0.02
0.15
-0.06
-0.25
-0.12
0.82
-0.02
-0.06
0.33
-0.27
-0.95
-0.31
0.86

1.64
5
0.12
-0.03
-0.07
-0.12
-0.08
-0.41
0.38
-0.10
-0.01
-0.12
0.02
0.10
-0.90
0.38
1.16
6
0.08
0.10
-0.53
0.24
0.18
0.10
-0.24
0.12
-0.08
-0.78
0.84
0.19
0.00
-0.17
1.36

    weight of the factor is calculated as the root mean  square  of the co-
efficient by columns.
                                    158

-------
    TABLE 2.   FACTOR SOLUTION FOR RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER
          SAMPLES OF TRIBUTARIES OF THE GORKY RESERVOIR, 1954-1958
1
Level
cr
so|-
HCO~ nig/liter
Mg2+
Na+ + K+
zi
cr
so|-
HC03 % eq.
Na+ + K+

2
-0.00
0.24
0.19
0.17
0.04
0.10
0.60
0.19
0.04
-0.06
0.04
-0.75
-0.15
0.98

Factor
3
0.00
0.15
-0.37
0.26
0.20
0.13
0.01
0.17
-0.21
-0.99
0.93
-0.08
0.06
0.05
Mapping Coefficient
4
-0.00
0.10
0.01
0.12
-0.07
0.15
-0.02
0.08
-0.02
-0.02
0.02
-0.54
0.92
0.02
5
+0.00
0.74
0.83
0.94
0.94
0.92
0.74
0.96
0.34
-0.09
0.21
-0.37
0.35
0.18
6
0.00
0.49
-0.20
-0.08
-0.18
-0.20
0.11
-0.09
0.91
-0.04
-0.26
-0.07
0.10
0.01
Weight of factor         1.44       1.49      1.10      2.40      1.14
                                     159

-------
    TABLE 3.  FACTOR SOLUTION FOR RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER
                SAMPLES FROM KUYBYSHEV RESERVOIR, 1954-1961
1
Level
ci-
s°r
HCQ- mg/liter
O
Ca2+
Mg2+
Na+ + K+
Ei
CT
s°r
HCOj % eq.
Ca2+
Mg2+
Na+ + K+

2
-0.05
0.45
0.79
0.96
0.92
0.80
0.45
0.92
-0.04
0.37
-0.19
-0.07
0.19
-0.05
Factor
3
-0.01
0.29
0.05
0.17
-0.06
0.01
0.77
0.18
0.26
-0.18
-0.08
-0.73
-0.32
0.89
Mapping Coefficient
4
-0.03
0.82
0.21
-0.06
0.22
0.12
0.35
0.21
0.93
0.05
-0.57
-0.13
-0.12
0.19
5
-0.10
0.07
0.19
0.16
0.13
0.55
-0.21
0.16
-0.00
0.21
-0.06
-0.12
0.87
-0.38
6
-0.03
0.13
0.52
-0.01
0.28
0.20
0.07
0.22
-0.07
0.82
-0.44
0.07
0.07
-0.08
Weight of factor         2.12       1.51      1.48      1.19      1.16
                                     160

-------
    TABLE 4.   FACTOR SOLUTION FOR RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER
    SAMPLES FROM KUYBYSHEV RESERVOIR TAKEN NEAR VYAZOVYYE (VOLGA RIVER)
      AND SOKOLI GORY (KAMA RIVER) AND NEAR KOMSOMOLSKIY (TAILWATER),
                                 1958-1959
1
Level
CT
HCO^ mg/ liter
Mg2+
Na+ + K+
Zi
cr
HCOg % eq.
Ca2+
Mg2+
Na+ + 'K+

2
-0.02
0.84
0.45
0.14
0.36
0.23
-0.01
0.49
0^96
-0.10
-ii93
-0.72
-0.58
0.80

Factor
3
0.18
0.05
-0.10
-0.14
-0.09
-0.54
0.02
-0.06
-0.01
-0.07
0.05
0.11
-0.78
0.26
Mapping Coefficient
4
-0.01
-0.12
0.42
0.10
0.08
0.05
0.03
0.03
-0.23
0.98
-0.30
0.03
-0.12
-0.08
5
-0.00
-0.08
0.06
0.13
-0.04
0.07
-0.01
0.06
-0.02
-0.02
0.03
-0.46
-0.05
0.37
6
0.07
-0.51
-0.76
-0.95
-0.89
-0.77
-0.08
-0.86
-0.17
-0.04
0.20
0.43
0.10
-0.37
Weight of factor         2.16       1.03      1.16      0.62      2.06
                                     161

-------
    TABLE 5.  FACTOR SOLUTION FOR RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER
     SAMPLES OF TRIBUTARIES OF THE VOLGA RIVER AND KUYBYSHEV RESERVOIR,
                                 1954-1961
1
Level
cr
soj-
HCOg mg/ liter
Ca2+
Mg2+
Na+ + K +
zi
Cl"
SO2-
HCOg % eq.
Ca2+
Mg2+
Na+ + K+

2
-0.04
0.28
0.92
0.97
0.97
0.96
0.45
0.99
-0.15
0.62
-0.44
0.24
-0.05
-0.21
Factor
3
-0.08
0.33
-0.13
-0.04
-0.14
-0.04
0.59
-0.02
0.27
-0.26
0.03
-0.90
-0.05
0.89

Mapping Coefficient
4
-0.20
-0.86
-0.08
0.13
-0.06
-0.03
-0.47
-0.09
-0.94
-0.20
0.69
0.02
0.24
-0.13
5
0.05
-0.02
0.27
-0.02
0.12
0.08
0.03
0.08
-0.03
0.67
-0.52
0.13
-0.10
-0.05
6
-0.03
-0.10
-0.07
-0.06
-0.12
0.18
-0.26
-0.09
-0.09
-0.20
0.20
0.32
0.89
-0.28
Weight of factor         2.37       1.50      1.58      0.92      1.10
                                    162

-------
    TABLE  6.   FACTOR  SOLUTION FOR RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER
                SAMPLES FROM VOLGOGRAD RESERVOIR, 1954-1961
1
Level
CT
HCO^ mg/liter
Ca2+
Mg2+
Na+ + K+
Ei
cr
so*-
HCO^ % eq.
Ca2+
Mg2+
Na+ + K+

2
-0.09
0.68
0.84
0.95
SUM
0.06
0.61
0.92
0.01
0.42
-0.17
-0.11
0.03
0,04
Factor
3
0.14
0.71
0.18
-0.04
0.22
0.08
0.16
0.19
0.98
0.08
-0.46
-0.05
0.08
-0.00
Mapping Coefficient
4
0.15
-0.04
-0.09
-0.13
-0.00
-0.04
0.12
-0.09
0.05
-0.05
0.00
0.35
-0.98
0.20
5
-0.05
-0.02
-0.47
-0.06
-0.21
-0.03
-0.08
-0.20
• 0.15
-0.86
0.24
0.00
-0.09
0.05
6
-0.07
0.18
0.13
0.23
-0.06
0.02
0^75
0.21
0.07
-0.05
0.04
-0.88
-0.11
0.72
Weight  of factor          2.10       1.36      1.08      1.07      1.43
                                     163

-------
    TABLE 7.  FACTOR SOLUTION FOR RESULTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER
     SAMPLES FROM TRIBUTARIES OF VOLGA RIVER BELOW KUYBYSHEV RESERVOIR,
                                 1954-1961
1
Level
Cl"
so|-
HCO^ mg/ liter
Ca2+
Mg2+
Na+ + K+
zi
Cl
SOJ-
HCOq % eq.
Ca2+
Mg2+
Na+ + K+

2
-0.26
0.04
0.97
0.77
0.97
0.89
0.31
0.97
-0.31
0.85
-0.75
0.04
0.34
-0.21
Factor
3
0.06
0.31
-0.03
0.29
-0.13
0.05
0.82
0.17
0.26
-0.11
-0.16
-0.97
0.14
0.90

Mapping Coefficient
4
0.07
0.10
-0.08
-0.30
-0.05
-0.43
0.16
-0.10
0.14
-0.16
-0.05
0.19
-0.91
0.29
5
-0.02
0.93
-0.19
-0.20
-0.00
0.05
0.27
0.02
0.89
-0.46
-0.55
-0.16
-0.20
0.25
6
0.02
0.08
-0.06
0.40
0.09
0.04
0.16
0.14
-0.12
-0.09
0.23
0.02
0.02
-0.04
Weight of factor         2.44       1.66      1.15      1.57      0.56
                                     164

-------
 £^,300

 i ^ 200
 o  c

 5   10°
       0

OC     -e
2>   25
!/5 u E
^ ^y (j
< LU   15
oc
 _ 50
 Ol


 (^
 O
  25
   10
- 10
CO


+  5
ra
Z


   0
en
E 150
 D
O

i  50
 8
      10


       5

       0
           I   I    I    I
           i   i
      I    I    I    I    I
                                             10
                                             5
                                          o
                                             0
                                            350
                                          £ 250
                                          8
                                          <5
                                               50

                                               10
                                          B5 5
                                             0
                                            200

                                            150
                                             "•  50

                                                 0

                                          w  _ 300

                                          a  ^ 200

                                          <    100

                                                 0
                                          i  .   35
                                        =!    25
                                        3 ~
                                        < en
                                                    I   J
                                              L  II
                                                  il
                                                                i   i   i
                                                                III
          1951
             1953
                       1955
1951
1953
1955
         Figure  1.   Berezina  River at  Gorval,  1951-1956.
                                  165

-------
TABLE 8.  FACTOR SOLUTION FOR RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES
          OF GORVAL TRIBUTARY, BEREZINA RIVER, 1951-1956
1
Discharge, m3
Ca2+, mg/liter
Mg2+
Na+ + K+
HCO§
so'-
Cl"
Hardness
Zi % Eq.
Si
Fe
Hardness
Perman. oxide

2
-0.35
0.69
0.56
-0.10
0.79
0.87
0.66
-0.12
0.88
0.02
0.03
0.09
0.00
Factor
3
-0.07
-0.28
0.08
0.92
-0.42
-0.02
0.32
-0.18
0.05
0.02
-0.17
-0.16
0.09
Mapping
4
0^40
-0.24
-0.08
-0.34
-0.39
0.17
-0.03
-0.04
-0.46
-0.16
-0.02
-0.42
0.06
Coefficient
5 6
0.40
0.11
0.00
-0.12
0.22
-0.01
-0.01
-0.42
0.10
-0.02
-0.08
-0.83
-0.35
                               166

-------
TABLE 9.  FACTOR SOLUTION FOR RESULTS OF ANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES
       FROM BOBRUSK TRIBUTARY OF BEREZINA RIVER, 1957-1973
1
Discharge, m3
Ca2+, mg/liter
Mg2+
Na+ + K+
HCO-
so2-
4
cr
Hardness
Z1 % Eq.
Si
Fe

2
-0.22
0.84
0.58
-0.05
0.88
0.75
0.19
0.87
0.06
-0.18
0.33
Factor
3
-0.20
0.12
0.16
0.16
0.11
0.35
O.J32
0.19
0.00
0.02
-0.02
Mapping Coefficient
4
0.09
0.03
-0.14
-0..87
0.08
-0.07
-0.11
-0.29
-0.05
0.18
-0.21
5
0.08
-0.11
0.31
0.03
-0.02
0.36
0.04
0.07
0.02
-0.00
0.00
6
0.35
-0.21
-0.36
-0.14
-0.40
0.10
-0.07
-0.34
-0.31
0.08
0.32
                               167

-------
    50
  O)

  E 30

  co"
  O


    10
   O)

   E 10
 - 240

  01
  E 190


 6° 140
 o

 X 90


    40
  _ 9

   en K
   E 6

  G 3


     0



  Jsoo
  Q- 180
    60
     10
< CO

SS
I- Q
  QC
  <
  n:
          1951
1953
1955
     Figure 2.   Berezina River at Gorval ,  1951-1956.
                          163

-------
analysis  of the regression equations indicates that by selecting  the  corre-
sponding  concentrations of Ca2+ and HC03 ions as basic variables,  one can
reliably  predict four other variables, i.e., Mg2+, Cl~, the sum of ions, and
total  hardness.  In Figure 2, the broken line shows the predicted  values for
these  variables.

    Attempts were made to use models generated for one of the points  and the
interrelated variables utilizing linear regression for prediction  of  the be-
havior of variables at other points.  As before, the values of the concen-
tration of Ca2+ and HC03 were used as the base variables.  The results of
this prediction are shown in Figure 3 and 4.  The high degree of  accuracy
achieved  remains constant throughout a 10-year period.  Additional  analysis
of these  data has shown that the concept of multidimensional samples  lacking
a natural mean, or a natural average of eigenvalues of the covariation ma-
trix is not suitable for statistical interpretation of series of  hydrochemi-
cal indices.  Correlation was found between measurements of the vector of
means, and the vector of eigenvalues in the time scale of reading.  The in-
troduction of these hypotheses relative to the structure of the hydrochemi-
cal fields enables a modeling approach from the point of view outlined
below.
SELECTION OF PARAMETERS OF THE MODELING SYSTEM FOR DETERMINATION OF THE
SPATIAL STRUCTURE OF HYDROCHEMICAL FIELDS

    Based on the above general considerations concerning the unity of all
indices forming the structure of a hydrochemical field, a method of place-
ment of a system of observations for determining the spatial organization of
the field naturally follows.  The essence of this method is that parameters
of the empirical models are determined which can be used to make the transi-
tion from integral  field characteristics to particular characteristics for a
predetermined point.  The network of initial observations can be adjusted in
order to select empirical dependence adequate to the existing structure of
the hydrochemical field, considering the limited nature of the number of
measurements.

    Sequential analysis of the structure of the hydrochemical field can be
represented by the  placement of r measurements on a grid of k-£ possible
measurements (r «k-£).  In this case, p and q are the ordinal numbers of
the points at which information is obtained, corresponding to the coordi-
nates Zp and Xp; p  = 1,..., k; q = !,...£.  The introduction of the vector
Bpq = BpqUp, Xq),  of dimensionality n, characterizes a corresponding cell
of the field, obtained by the results of measurement of a list of n indices.
    In each cell  of the field, mpq measurements of the_ index ypq(s); s =
l,...,n are performed, and the vector of mean values ynq is calculated.
Since in the initial stage of analysis, mpq ty s, and the reliable matrices
of the indices cannot be calculated, we cair represent the field as follows:
                                    169

-------
    - 50
    en
    E
    TO 30
    o


      10

      14



    - 10
    en
       2


     170
    «
   O
      90

      50
      15
    - 10
    O)
    E
     300
   cr
   cu
   *-<

   § 200
   W
   d>
   CL
     100
  c/>
 . w
f%<
l§?
H <
  I
0

8
II
                                J
                                         II
                                          L
JD
O
CO

•P
(O

s-
OJ
                                                              ra
                                                              c
                                                              •r-
                                                              N
                                                              HI
                                                              S-
                                                              OJ
                                                              QQ
                                   00

                                   0)

                                   3
                                   O)
           1957     1958
                     1959
       1965
                                                       1973
                                 170

-------
 - 100
 en
 E

 «3  50
     0


    40
  Dl
  E

  di 20
    0


    60


  ro

  E 40
  n
  O
  o
  I
    20
  - 30
  O>
  E 20
  o
    10
   300
c

S
0)

^
   200

   100

    0
   30
LJJ

I  20
DC —
O
    0
                   f         A  f  f\    f
                  J       -/   u        vJ
                    i    I I	iv
                                                      o
                                                     ^t
                                                      c.
                                                      
                                                      to

                                                      s_
                                                      OJ
                                                           oo
                                                           QJ
                                          1969   1970

-------
                   *   *   (ypq(i)  ' *(1))  (ypq(i)  •
                  p=l q=l


    Suppose the mean value of the  vector of  observed  indices,  and the corre-
sponding covariance matrix at this point in  the  field  can  be restored by
means of a linear transform of the vector  of mean  values  and covariance
matrix, characterizing the entire  field as a whole,  i.e.,

    ypq = Lpqy;
where L   is an n-n matrix of coefficients.

Suppose
    Lpq = LJq
where a, apq and 3pq are the diagonals of an n n matrix of  eigenvalues;
while H is an n-n matrix of eigenvectors.

    In this case, the simplifications
                                                                         (4)
can be applied.

    The procedure of calculation of Bpq at each  instant  in  time  after  a
group r of measurements includes the following sequence  of  operations:
                                      172

-------
    1.  Refinement of vector ypq if measurements  have  been  performed
        at a given point in the field.

    2.  Refinement of the vector y.

    3.  Refinement of the matrices R, H~  , a.

    4.  Calculation according to (4) for  each  point  in  the  field  Bpq,  apq.

    In this case, the vector Bpq represents each  cell of  the  field  as  inde-
pendent of all previous measurements in any of the cells  of the field.   The
expediency of this very procedure is demonstrated by the  following  consider-
ations.

    The recursive nature of the estimation of  parameters  of a point in  the
field, even with non-optimal placement of points  of  information measurement,
guarantees
where t is the next measurement time.

    If the number of experiments is sufficient to guarantee  (5), this  plan
of estimation allows an explicit prediction to be given for  an  arbitrary
point in the network.  The error of prediction in this case  depends  not on
the random errors of measurement at arbitrary points on the  network, but
rather on the number of experiments performed and the resolution of  the net-
work as a whole.

    Adaptive estimation of parameters 3pq  is possible, and is accomplished
by the introduction of the strategy of effective "omission".  For example,
in the exponential form e = exp{y(t-j - t)}, where t is the current instant
in time of the measurement; t-j is the instant in time of the previous  mea-
surement, then Y is the "omission" factor.  This strategy accomplishes
experimental planning with respect to possible instabilities.

    Finally, each cell of the network is characterized by the actual vector
of means and covariance matrix, which allows testing of rather  complex
multidimensional statistical hypotheses concerning the network  as a  whole.
This, in turn, allows a tranformation of the network, increasing its re-
solving capacity.

    Determination of optimal values of the frequencies of performance  of  ob-
servations    ,  based on the spatial heterogeneity of the field of measured
statistical  indexes    , may be made.  The regression equation  for BDq(s),
where s = l,...,n (the number of measured  characteristics at a  point in the
field), in the case of two-dimensional extrapolation (Fedorov 1971;  Krug  et^
£]_.  1977)  can be represented as follows:
                                     173

-------
where  L-  (x  )  is  an analogous expression.
        J   H

    The dispersion of this  estimate  is


    dtcfZp.x^l-o2^  .^/?
-------
     5.   Discard in sequence one of the cells of the field  and  per-
         form calculations in (2), (3) and  (4).

     6.   Discard that field cell from analysis which by elimination
         produces the greatest change in  (9).

     7.   The procedure terminates with a  transition to step 9 if  the
         discarding of any point leads to an increase in the value
         of (9).

     8.   Return to step 1 .

     9.   Calculate cjj.- according to (8).

    10.   Recalculate the frequencies of measurements at the point
    The calculations should be performed for all values of s =  l,...,n; p =
l,...,k;  q = !,...,£ (k-£-n plans in all).  As a result of the  calculations
performed, for each point the summary necessary number of measurements which
can be perfomed given the arbitrary distribution of measurement frequencies
at this point is obtained.  This is converted to the assigned number of mea-
surements.  Naturally, when the arbitrary distribution is achieved, priority
recommendations (cost or any other consideration) can be made for the con-
duct of measurements.  This is achieved by modifying (6) and (9).

    The requirements of (5) assured consistency of estimate     , but the re-
sults of two-dimensional extrapolation, namely the calculation  of the dis-
persion of the prediction for a number of points relative to the remaining
points, may differ significantly from the desired value.  The heterogeneity
of the calculated statistical indexes Bpq results from the lack of homo-
geneity of the measured field.  In this case, based on the information accu-
mulated,  and by testing of the corresponding statistical hypotheses (Kulbak
1967), the entire space of observations is divided into the corresponding
subspaces.


CLASSIFICATION OF STRUCTURES OF HYDROCHEMICAL FIELDS

    Sequential  analysis of the structures of hydrochemical fields, which
forms the basis of solution of the extreme problem of placement of the net-
work of observations, utilizes the concept of smoothness of distribution of
the observed field parameters.

    The lack of homogeneity of observed or calculated indices is interpreted
by the researcher as a lack of homogeneity in the observed field.  This con-
clusion is correct within the framework of the conceptual or empirical model
selected.   In this case, the model  of the field description toward which the
researcher was  oriented should be changed.  Since the model uses not only

                                     175

-------
the mathematical apparatus of empirical  field  description, but also the
selected configuration of the observation  network,  additional empirical in-
formation on the field is required.

    The planning of measurements  at  new  points  on  the field or the introduc-
tion of new indices is necessary,  but the  uncertainty of this planning is
great.  In this case, the problem of classification arises, the solution to
which provides the necessary information for planning of new experiments.
The conceptual model of the field in this  case  is  fixed by preceding stages
of research, and, within the framework of  this  model, the empirical material
must be classified so that the heterogeneous field  is approximated by
classes of homogeneous fields.  It is necessary to  realize which of the two
tasks is being performed by the researcher:  typization or separation
(Ayvazyan et^ ^1_. 1974).  The task  of typization (representation),  the solu-
tion of which always exists, assumes separation of  the set of observed in-
dices (in this case, vectors 3pq)  into a comparatively small  number of
grouping areas.  The grouping areas  are  analogs of  the grouping intervals
used in processing of one dimensional observations, which defines  the nature
of the requirements:  uniform coverage of  the entire set of experimental
data by nonintersecting classes of samples, and assurance of  the minimum
possible distance between these areas.  The task of separation, whose solu-
tion may yield a negative result  if the entire  sample belongs to one clus-
ter, assumes natural stratification of the initial  observations into a
clearly expressed cluster (in this case, vectors
    Before indicating the relationship between  the  performance  of the tasks
of typization and separation in the reconstruction  of  a  model of  the struc-
ture of hydrochemical fields, it is necessary to  indicate  the specific char-
acteristics of the use of the methods of pattern  recognition  in hydro-
chemisty.  As we perform the task of recognition, the  most interesting char-
acteristics are those for which the difference  between the mean values of
classes is great in comparison with the standard  deviations within classes,
and not those for which the standard deviations are great  (Duda and Hart
1976).

    The introduction of measures of difference  between classes  in the form
of Euclidian distances, transformation by means of  the main components, or
factor mapping of the initial matrix of data on a standardized  matrix (with
the introduction of Euclidian distances) presumes that the space  of charac-
teristics is isotropic, i.e., the groups defined  by these  distances will be
invariant with respect to shifts, rotations, or dilations  (Ayvazyan ei_ al .
1974;  Duda and Hart 1976).  However, as studies have shown, the assumption
that the fields of hydrochemical indices are isotropic is  not valid.  The
absence of isotropicity can be clearly seen from  the tables of  factor solu-
tions  presented above.  In addition to the constantly  acting  factors, and
practically constant dispersions of indices from  object  to object, the vari-
able parameters are the weights of the factors  participating  in the descrip-
tion of the dispersion of the measured indices.

    A  natural invariant for each of the measured  vectors ypn(s) of the field
is represented by the calculated indices Bpn, where p, q are, as  before, the
number of the measured point, while s is an ordinal  number with respect to

                                    176

-------
time.   Actually, when the task of typization is performed for statistical
parameters (the number of vectors to be analyzed is only k*£, significantly
less than the number of all experiments in the network for measurement of
vectors ypq(s)), we obtain nontrivial information on the structure of the
hydrochemical field.  The presence of 3(r), where r is the class number, en-
ables  a fixed description for the entire set of characteristic measurement
points in the form of statistical characteristics, namely the covariance
matrices

    R(r) = H3(r)a3(r)H"1;                                               (11)

and the vectors of means

    m(r) = H (r)H'1y;                                                   (12)

where H, a and y are defined and calculated according to (3), (4), while N
is, as before, the number of classes, r = 1,...,N.

    The information measure of difference for classes i, j (Kulbak 1967) in
this case, if the hypothesis of mixed multidimensional normal distributions
is accepted, is as follows:


    3(1,j) = 1 tr
                n
                Z  {[B(i,a)ot(a)3(i,a) - 3(j,a)a(a)»(j,a)] x
               a=l


              (6(j,a)a(a)3(j,a))"1 - (3(i ,a)a(a)3(i .a))"1) +


               yT HaH^y;                                               (13)
where a = l,...,n is the ordinal number of the index


    a(a) = [3(i,a) - 3(j,a)] [-* - }- - + -7 - 1 - ] x
                              B (j,a) a(a)   3 (i,a)a(a)
              1.a) - p(J.a)] = [g'a  -g.
                                        3 (J»a)


Using the expression

                                    177

-------
     yT HaH'V = tr  {H'V yT H) ;                                         (15)
 we can write
     Analysis  of the  expressions  (14),  (16) indicates that both of the com-
 ponents  contain the  terms
 If  the  entire  sample  is  normalized  with respect to the mean, i.e., y = 0,
 then  (16)  becomes


     3M  i)  -  ]   y   r32(i.a)  -  32(j,a)2
     8(1'J)  ' 2  J,  I   BtUJ-eU.aJ   1   '                                <]7)


     It  is  seen  from (17) that  the Euclidian  distance providing  isotropicity
 of  the  space of  characteristic   on the assumption of nonisotropicity of the
 space of characteristics y has been achieved.   This, in turn, opens the pos-
 sibility of using factorial  analysis for the solution of the problem of
 dimensionality  of the  space  of characteristics  3pq,  which enables simplifi-
 cation  of  the task of  typization objects of  observation.

    However, the question of the minimum number of classes into which the
 space of characteristics should be divided remains open.   Following the com-
 mon recommendations (Ayvazyan et al_. 1974; Duda and  Hart  1976), it can be
 indicated that the approach  of~d"irected decision-making functions here. The
 classification procedure leads to a decrease in (9),  which is equivalent to
 a contradiction between the  statistical  classification  and spatial homo-
 geneity of classes.

    Thus, the methods  of analysis suggested  do  not contradict the concept of
 the field used in hydrochemistry, and can be used  in  the  prediction of
 space-time characteristics of hydrochemical  indices,  providing  optimization
 of the network, with respect to spatial  parameters  and  with  respect to time.


 REFERENCES

Ayvazyan, S.A., Z.I. Bezhayeva, and O.V. Staroverov.   1974.  Classification
    of multidimensional observations, Moscow, Statistika  Press, 240 pp.
                                    178

-------
Duda,  R.  and P.  Hart.   1976.  Pattern recognition and cost analysis, Moscow,
    Mir Press,  511  pp.

Fedorov,  V.V.   1971.   Optimal experiment theory.  Moscow, Nauka Press, 312
    pp.

Krug,  6.K.  e*  al_.   1977.  Experimental planning in problems of identifica-
    tion  and extrapolation.  Nauka Press, Moscow, 208 pp.

Kulbak, S.   1967.   Information theory and statistics.  Nauka Press, Moscow,
    408 pp.

Waddington, K.H.  1948.  Organizers and genes.  Foreign Literature Press,
    Moscow, 206 pp.

Zenin, A.A.  1961.   Results of hydrochemical studies of the Volga reservoirs
    in 1954-1961.   Rostov-na-Donu, 209 pp.
                                     179

-------
                                 SECTION 10

                 TRANSPORT OF MINING WASTE IN LAKE  SUPERIOR

                 M. Sydor, G.E. Glass1 and W.R. Swain2
INTRODUCTION
    The western arm of Lake Superior has a 100 km trough  which  extends
along the Minnesota shoreline from Knife River, Minnesota where the  trough
is 180 m deep past Silver Bay, Minnesota, where depths  range  around  250 m
(Figure 1).  An average of 67,000 tons of fine iron ore tailings are dis-
charged at Silver Bay into the lake every day.  The discharge is the largest
source of particulates along the Minnesota shore.  Transport  of tailings in
western Lake Superior have been the subject of considerable  local  interest
(Cook 1974) and general interest regarding dispersion of  contaminants in the
Great Lakes.  The transport of particulates can be investigated through use
of remote sensing and numerical modeling.  Fine particulates  in lakes are
identifiable through use of Landsat data (Sydor, Stortz,  and  Swain  1978;
Sydor 1978).  Their remote sensing signatures provide valuable  information
for studies of the dispersal processes and verification of numerical models
(Diehl ejt aj_. 1977).  We consider here measurements and remote  sensing data
which suggest transport of tailings by means of an upwelling.  Two wind epi-
sodes are discussed in detail.  In one instance transports and  dispersal of
a plume is simulated numerically for the actual wind and  pressure  conditions
over the lake.  The model results are subsequently compared with measure-
ments of suspended solids and the remote sensing data for the plume. The
results show that the direct transport of tailings cannot readily  account
for the episodes of high concentration of tailings at the Duluth water in-
take.  In the instance chosen as our second example, Landsat  images  for two
consecutive days show discrete high concentration patches of  tailings which
appear to have upwelled during westerly winds.  The successive  images and
current measurements at two stations show that tailings patches are  trans-
ported in accordance with the results from numerical models.   The  patches
appear to have originated from an upwelling near the Duluth water  intake.
The data for the intake show that the concentration of  tailings in  the
'U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental  Research Laboratory,
 Duluth, Minnesota 55804.
2U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Large  Lakes  Research  Station,  Grosse
 lie, Michigan 48138.
                                    180

-------
CO
                              N
                   Min nesota
                                              Lake  Superior
         Duluth
                                                         km
                                   W i  s c o n s i  n
           Figure 1.
Study area  showing the outline of a deep trough where tailings  are discharged
         and the discharge source location at  Silver Bay.

-------
patches exceeded 3 mg/£, a  level which  is  an  order  of magnitude higher than
the concentrations produced by the direct  transport of turbidity to Duluth.
DISCUSSION

    Information regarding direct transport  of  tailings  in the form of a sur-
face turbidity plume along the Minnesota shore from  Silver Bay to Duluth can
be obtained by using remote sensing data for a specific storm event.   During
November 9-14, 1975, a severe storm produced an  extensive turbidity plume
off Silver Bay.  Remote sensing data for the event provides information on
the extent of the plume at one instant of time.   To  determine the dispersal
of turbidity throughout the event we can simulate the plume numerically for
the entire period and compare the results of the model  with the remote
sensing data for November 14, 1975 at the instant of time when the image was
taken.

    It was first necessary to calculate the transports  in the lake through-
out the event.  This was done using a depth integrated  model  for Lake
Superior performed on a 6 x 6 km grid, using quadratic  bottom friction and
employing a numerical scheme due to Leendertse (1967).   The results of the
model for a generalized steady wind function have been  discussed in detail
by Diehl et_ _al_. (1977).  However, for the case here  a numerical  method of
handling the actual pressure distribution term and the  wind function  which
occurred on November 9-14, 1975 was needed.  The  function and the pressure
term for the storm were devised from approximation of the actual winds mea-
sured at weather stations around Lake Superior (Maanum  1977).   Weather re-
cords from nine Coast Guard stations around the  lake provided information on
wind speed, wind direction, and the atmospheric  pressure gradients every 2
hours. The problem of finding pressure gradients  at  every grid point  was
handled by devising a fit to the atmospheric pressure data for a low  pres-
sure cell which moved in the proximity of the  lake during the storm.

    The formula used to fit the atmospheric pressure data was

                   pa = f(a,r) (b+cx+dy)

where pa is the atmospheric pressure,

    (x,y) is the position in cartesian coordinates relative to the center
          of the storm,

    r is the distance from the storm center,

    a,b,c,d are empirical coefficients, and

    f(a,r)  is some function of r and a.

    The coefficients b, c, and d were treated  as  quadratic functions  of
time:
                                     182

-------
    pa = f(a,r) [(b0 + b^ + b2t2) + (CQ + C]t + c2t2)x +  (dQ +  d^  +  d2t


The function f was taken as f(a,r) = r2 + ar3, which provided a good  fit  to
the radial dependence of the pressure term.  The value of a. was varied  while
the other 9 coefficients were found by the method of least squares  until  the
sum of the squared differences between the calculated and measured  pressures
was minimized.

    Atmospheric pressures calculated by this model  agreed well  with the mea-
sured pressures both in time and space.  Once the coefficients  were found,
the pressure gradients were also known by taking spatial derivatives  of the
empirical formula.  Subsequently, wind directions were obtained by  rotating
the direction of the pressure gradient field  125°  counterclockwise.  A
form similar to the one used to fit pressures was fitted to the measured
winds, to obtain wind speeds everywhere.

    Wind speeds were given by

                   W = f'(a',r) (b1 + c'x + d'y)

where W is the wind speed, the coefficients b1, c1, and d1 were treated as
4th-order functions of time, and f'(a',r) = r/(r2 + a12).  Figure 2 shows
the fit to the wind data at Duluth.  The calculated and measured water
levels are shown in Figure 3.  Spectral analysis of the calculated  water
levels produce free surface modes given by Mortimer and Fee (1976).   To
check the direction and speed of the vertically averaged currents at  Silver
Bay we considered measurements of currents for several wind episodes  re-
ported by Baumgartner et^ aj_. (1973).  The comparison was made for the well-
mixed isothermal conditions in March, April, October, and November  and  is
shown in Tables 1 and 2.  The calculated transports agree reasonably  well
with the expected currents.  The transport pattern  for the entire area  is
shown in Figures 4 and 5.  Generally, the patterns  in Figures 4 and 5 show
typical results for westerly and easterly winds (Ruschmeyer 1956; Diehl et^
al. 1977).  The transports for both winds move down the Minnesota shore from
Silver Bay towards Duluth.  For westerly winds, Figure 4, the pattern shows
a broad turn around between Knife River and Duluth.  Thus, the  surface  con-
taminants from Silver Bay would be normally transported away from the shore
in this region of the lake.  Westerly winds produce a counterclockwise  cir-
cultion cell in the extreme western Lake Superior west of a line from Sand
Island to Silver Bay (Ruschmeyer 1956).  The transport pattern  for  easterly
winds, Figure 5, is quite different.  For easterly  winds the cell-like
structure disappears.  Figure 5 shows transports following the  Minnesota
shore all the way from Silver Bay to Duluth.  For easterly winds the  magni-
tude of currents along Minnesota shore ranges from  6-30 cm/sec, averaging
at 10 cm/sec.  One would thus anticipate for the event modeled  here,  that
the tailings caught in the turbulence at the onset  of the high  winds  on
November 10 would be transported from Silver Bay for a distance of  about  30
km to the vicinity of Two Harbors by the time of the satellite  overpass on
November 14.  This was indeed the case, Figure 6.
                                     183

-------
CO
-p-
             J
             a
                30+
20+
                10+
      WIND  FIT AT DULUTH

      —  calculated

       O  measured
                      11/8/75
                                     10
                                                                   11
12
                                                                               13
           Figure 2.  Comparison at Duluth of the measured  winds and wind function  used for modeling of
                                     Lake Superior for  the November 1975 storm.

-------
CO
en
        -30--
        -45--
	 computed

	 measured
                                                    DULUTH,  MM.

                                                   	1	
                11/8/ 75
                                  10
11
12
13
         Figure 3.  Comparison at Duluth of the measured  water  level fluctuations with the fluctuations
              derived from the numerical model of Lake Superior  for the November 1975 storm wind.

-------
                TABLE 1.  COMPARISON OF CURRENTS NEAR  DULUTH
Wind
Conditions
Simulated North-
easterly


Measured North-
easterly
Simulated Westerly

Measured Westerly
Speed M/S Dir.
12
10-11.5
17
15
10-11.5
13
13
13
13
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
WNW
NW
WNW
Currents
Speed CM/S Dir.
13.2
13.6
20.2
19.2
21.1
17.5
1.5
2.7
3.1
224°
226°
230°
221°
243°
225°
50°
49°
30°
Date
11/10/75
4/3/76
11/13/75
Composite
10/24/73
11/13/73
Composite
11/11/75
10/26/73
Time
0400
1600
0200

0800
0400

0600
0000
Measured currents at 18 m depth at Duluth intake in Lake Superior.

Calculated current at grid 3 average depth 24 m at grid center 3 km from
Duluth intake.
              TABLE 2.   COMPARISON OF CURRENTS NEAR SILVER BAY

Conditions
Simulated North-
easterly
Measured North-
easterly
Simulated Westerly
Measured Westerly
Wind
Speed M/S
15
17.5
10
13
8
11
11
Currents
Dir.
NE
NE
NE
NW
NW
WNW
WNW
Speed CM/S
5
9.7
5.3
4-7.4 1
3.6
1.6
7.8
8
Dir.
243°
236°
210°
60-255°
234°
226°
243°
229°
Date
Composite
11/13/75
9/18/72
October
11/11/75
3/31/76
10/8/72
10/14/72
Time
40 hrs
0200
30 hrs
1800
0200
1400
1600
Measured currents 8 km from Silver Bay every 1/2 hour at 3 depths  (15 m,
46 m, 191 m) time averaged over 4 hours were used to determine the  depth
integrated flow speed.

Calculated current 12 km southwest from Silver Bay at grid center  14 average
depth 175 m.
                                    186

-------
Date  11 Nov. 75  Time 0600
Vertically Averaged Currents
      After 66 Hours
   Scale   °	3°cm/sec.        Silver
                                  Bay;
        Figure 4.  Water transports  due  to westerly wind stress.  A
          circulation cell which forms for the westerly winds  is
          responsible for entrapment of  pollutants and subsequent
          increased biological  productivity in this region  of  the
                                  lake.
                                   187

-------
00
CO
            Date  13 Nov.  75  Time 0600
            Vertically Averaged Currents
                   After J14 Hours
                 Scale
cm/sec.
Silver
  Bay<
         Superior
      Figure 5.  Calculated transports for November 13, 1975 showing  water movement for high fetch north-
      easterly winds.  For northeasterly winds tailings discharged at Silver Bay are transported directly
         to Duluth.  Note that  for easterly winds  the transports along the Wisconsin shore also bring
          turbidity  to the Duluth area.  (See the  corresponding pattern for distribution of suspended
                                         solids in Figure 8).

-------
    To compare the dimensions and the concentrations of the observed  plume
with predicted transport of tailings, the turbidity plume  itself was
modeled.   The discharge of tailings is a slurry which takes most of the
tailings  down in a density current to the bottom of the lake.  However,  some
tailings  are stripped off from the density current to form a turbidity
plume. To simulate the dispersal of the turbidity plume, transports  had to
be approximated on much finer grid scale.  The grid size used  in the  cal-
culation  of transports had to be subdivided to the dimensions  compatible
with representation of the mixing processes (Csanady 1973, Galloway 1977).
The original 6x6 kilometer grid used in calculation of transport was thus
subdivided in the dispersion model into 0.6 x 1 km subgrids, a size com-
parable to transport lengths per half hour integration time step used in the
turbidity dispersion model.  The currents at the subgrids were obtained  by
interpolation of currents found in the transport model.  Near  the shore  the
tangential currents were held constant and the normal currents were termi-
nated linearly to zero.

    In each subgrid of the dispersion model the residual suspended  load
brought in by the currents and diffusion was completely mixed  every half
hour.  A  diffusivity of 1 m2/sec was used (Orlob 1959).  Since the currents
were largely responsible for the transport of the suspended load, the dif-
ferential scheme for turbidity dispersion was essentially first order in the
temporal  and spatial coordinates and no problems with convergence or  stabil-
ity occurred.  Numerical mixing method accentuates the diffusion of the
source, and introduces distortion due to preferential spreading of the lead-
ing edge  of the plume.  Thus, the calculated plume overestimated the  actual
plume length.  To minimize this problem and to assure stability the upstream
suspended solids concentration gradients were used for calculation of new
concentrations at each grid, however, even with optimum time step slight
skewing of the concentrations was expected in the calculated plume.   The
center of mass of the simulated plume was, however, transported properly.
The advantage of using the finite difference method for calculation of dis-
persal of turbidity comes from the ease of calculation and low machine time
cost.

    In simulation of the November 14 plume at Silver Bay, the  source  of  the
fine particulates was approximated by taking 3% of the 67,000  tons/day dis-
charge as the fraction of fines which would escape the density current under
storm conditions (Glass 1973).  This approximation appeared reasonable upon
comparison of the actual and the simulated concentrations of the suspended
solids within the plume.  An equilibrium concentration of tailings amounting
to 10,000 tons of fines distributed uniformly over a .6 km2 grid located at
the source was taken as the initial boundary condition.  The resulting simu-
lated plume, Figure 6, compares well with the turbidities found from  sam-
pling measurements near Two Harbors, Figure 7, and the distribution of tur-
bidity, Figure 8, derived from the relationship shown in Figure 7 and Land-
sat data  for November 14, 1975.  Many plumes observed in Landsat imagery for
Silver Bay show similar characteristics.  The remote sensing data generally
verify the transport patterns exhibited by the numerical model and agree
with the  distribution of suspended particulates predicted by the dispersion
model over a period of several days.  One can thus expect the  numerical
methods to yield reasonable results for longer term dispersal, say over  a

                                     189

-------
10
o
          Dulut
                                                                                Sus. Sol. mg/l
                                                        Lake Superior
                                                                                      20 kn
     Figure 6.  Numerical simulation of the plume of mining waste from point source at Silver Bay, Minnesota.

      The plume represents the dispersal of 3% of suspended solids  stripped off from the discharge slurry.

-------
                       TURB.-SUS SOL


                       TURB.-PAND4C   R=086


                       NOV. 14 TURB - B4C
                              Turbidity (NTU)
Figure 7.  Turbidity vs. Landsat Band 4 intensity above background.   Measured
  values of suspended solids for November 14 near Two Harbors are indicated
 by  the open triangles.  This relationship used in conjunction with  Landsat
  data allows for derivation of the distribution of surface concentrations
                   of suspended solids in Lake Superior.
                                    191

-------
       Suspended  Solids  Nov. 14,1975
            Silver
              Bay
        7R   7mg/|  RED CLAY

        2T   2mg/|  TAILINGS

        2M   2mg/|  MIXED
N
  MINNESOTA
                                         Lake  Superior
Duluth
                       WISCONSIN
Figure 8.  Turbidity plume derived from Landsat  data for November 14, 1975.
   Particulate concentrations and type are marked by numbers,  (mg/&) and
letters respectively; where R - red clay, T - tailings, M - mixed red clay
 tailings.  Note the red  clay originating from erosion along the Wisconsin
  shore is transported towards Duluth, and is subsequently taken out in a
    narrow plume along the center axis of the lake.  (See reference 4).
                                 192

-------
couple of weeks.   Starting with the turbidity distribution observed  on
November 14,  1975 as the initial condition, plume dispersal calculation  was
extended over a period of two weeks, a time sufficient for the transport of
the center of mass of the plume to Duluth.  After two weeks of simulation
time the model produced concentrations of tailings near Duluth ranging
around 0.2 mg/£,  a background concentration typically found at the Duluth
water intake.  It is therefore unlikely that direct transport of  large tail-
ings plumes from Silver Bay to Duluth could produce concentrations of tail-
ings near Duluth in excess of 1 mg/n, a value necessary to explain high  mo-
mentary concentrations of amphibole fibers at the Duluth intake shortly
after a passage of high easterly winds (Cook 1974).

    As mentioned before, satellite data can be used to identify the  type of
particulates  in the lake based on the spectral dependence of the  volume  re-
flectance of  suspended solids (Sydor 1978).  Using the signature  given in
Table 3 for tailings and red clay, we obtain a classification of  the tur-

  TABLE 3.  BAND COMBINATIONS FOR SIGNATURE CLASSIFICATION OF CONTAMINANTS

  Contaminant                                  Band Combinations

  Red Clay     (Landsat 1)              (B4-B5) < 0     (B5-B6) > 1
                                        (B4-B6)/(B5-B6) < 1

               (Landsat 2)              (64-65) < 1     (65-65) > 1
                                        (B4-B6)/TB5-e6) < 1 2


  Tailings                              (64-65) > 0     (84/85) >_ 1-5
                                        (B4-B5)/(85-86) > 1.5


  Tannin                                (64-65) <_ -2    (84-85) <_ -2
                                        (84/85) < 0-6

64 - 6and 4 signal intensity above the clear water background.

bidities observed in the November 14, 1975 image.  The results are shown  in
Figure 8.  It can be seen that the turbidity plume at Silver Bay  and a tur-
bidity patch  near Duluth are identified as tailings.  The origin  of the
plume has been already discussed.  The area of tailings near Duluth  appears
to have resulted  from an upwelling produced by onset of westerly  winds on
November 10 and 11.  Unfortunately the ground truth data at Duluth intake
does not show a pronounced peak for tailings.  This could be largely due to
the presence  of high turbidity background due to intrusion of red clay.

    To consider a clear possibility of upwelling of tailing we examine data
for June 26 - July 3, 1973 when high concentration of tailings was observed
in the Duluth area, but when winds were predominately northwesterly  and  no
turbidity plume was evident near Silver Bay.  Suspended solids and currents
were monitored for those dates.  Landsat images for July 2 and 3, 1973 show
that red clay turbidity was confined to the Wisconsin shore so that  the

                                     193

-------
identification of suspended  solids  would  be largely confined to turbidity
due to  single contaminant type  rather  than  a mixture of contaminants as was
the case for November  14, 1975  when  ambiguities in identification in ground
truth and satellite data could  arise for  the mixtures of suspended solids.
The July images, Figure 9, show distinct  patches  of tailings with concentra-
tions of 3 mg/&.  The  patches are well  down stream from the Silver Bay dis-
charge  source.  The patches  occurred after  prolonged westerly-northwesterly
winds on June 26-30, 1973.   Easterly winds  over the lake were observed on
July 1, 1973, and the  currents  along Minnesota  shore were directed on July  1
towards Duluth (Keillor 1976).   The  easterly winds on July 1 were insuffi-
cient to produce large plumes at Silver Bay.  On  July 2 and 3 the winds re-
turned  to westerly directions.  .The  background  concentration of suspended
solids  along the Minnesota coast was 0.9  mg/1.  The records at the Duluth
water intake (Cook et_  aj_. 1974)  showed  a  pulse  of tailings in excess of 3
mg/£, confirming the tailing patch  detected in  the satellite data.  Compari-
son of the successive  positions  of the  discrete tailings patches for the
consecutive July 2 and 3 images  verify  the  circulating transports for
westerly winds.  The currents observed for  July 1-3,  1973 (Keillor 1976)
also support the transport patterns  predicted by  the  numerical  model.

    Thus high concentration of  tailings found at  the  Duluth water intake ap-
pear to arise from discrete patches  of  tailings upwelled from lake bottom
during the westerly winds.  The material  taken  down with the discharge
slurry  at Silver Bay remains unconsolidated at  the bottom of the lake trough
and extends over a long stretch of the  valley from Silver Bay to Two Har-
bors.  This unconsolidated material forms at  the  rising slope of the trough
a secondary source of  tailings  close to the Duluth water intake.  At times
of turbulence the material is readily resuspended and upwells with passage
of westerly winds.  A following  spell of  easterly wind transports the mate-
rial to the Duluth water intake.  The direct  turbidity plume at densities
in excess of 1  mg/£ appear confined to the  vicinity of Silver Bay.  The
plumes generally disperse below 0.2 mg/£  level  by the time they reach
Duluth.
REFERENCES

Baumgartner, D.J., W.F. Rittall, G.R. Ditsworth,  and  A.M.  Teeter.   1973.
    Investigation of pollution in western Lake  Superior  due  to  discharge of
 ,   mine tailings, Data Report 1971.  Pacific Northwest  Environmental  Re-
    search Laboratory Working Paper No. 10.  JJT^ Studies  Regarding  the  Ef-
    fect of the Reserve Mining Company Discharge  on Lake Superior.   USEPA,
    Washington, D.C.  p. 423.

Csanady, G.T.  1973.  Turbulent Diffusion in the  Environment.   Boston:  D.
    Reidel.

Cook, P.M.,  G.E. Glass, and J.H. Tucker.  1974.   Asbestiform amphibole mine-
    rals:  Detection and measurement of high concentrations  in  municipal
    water supplies, Science, 185, 853.
                                     194

-------
                                                             Silver
                                                             Bay
  Tailngs  signature

        July 2,  1b73
        JulyS,  1973
 i r
t r
       Minnesota
            Knife
                 R.
                      o o
                     o o o
                      o o
                    Wisconsin

Figure 9.  Discrete patches  of upwelled  tailings  observed in Landsat  data for
   July 2 and 3,  1973.  The material  upwelled during westerly winds  was
 responsible for a high influx of tailings to the Duluth water supply.  The
   influx usually occurs when the winds shift from westerly to easterly
   directions causing the transport of  the upwelled tailings to Duluth.

                                 195

-------
Diehl, S.R., W.E. Maanum, T.F. Jordan, and M.  Sydor.   1977.   Transports in
    Lake Superior.  J. Geophys. Res.  82(6):  977-79.

Galloway, P.M., Jr. and S.J. Vakil.  1977.  Criteria  for  the  use of vertical
    averaging in Great Lakes dispersion models.  J. Great Lakes  Res.
    3(1-2): 20-28.

Glass, G.E.  1973.  A study of western Lake Superior:   Surface  sediments,
    interstitial water and exchange of dissolved components across  the
    water-sediment interface.  Jn_ Studies Regarding the Effect  of the
    Reserve Mining Company Discharge on Lake  Superior.  USEPA,  Washington,
    D.C.  p. 1034.

Keillor, J.P., J. Young, and R.A. Ragotzkie.   1976.   An assessment  of the
    environmental effects of dredged material  disposal  in Lake  Superior,
    Marine Studies Center, Univ.  of Wisconsin, Madison  Publication, 4,  79,
    91.

Leendertse, J.J.  1967.  Aspects  of a computational model  for long  period
    water wave propagation, Memo R.M. 5294-PR, Rand Corp., Santa  Monica,
    California.

Maanum, W.E.  1977.  Numerical prediction of currents and transport in
    western Lake Superior, Thesis, Univ.  of Minnesota.

Mortimer, C.H. and E.J. Fee.  1976.  Free surface oscillations and  tides of
    Lake Michigan and Superior.  Phil.  Trans.  R. Soc., London A., 281,  1-
    61.

Orlob, G.T.  1959.  Eddy diffusion in homogenous turbulence.  J.  of
    Hydraulics Division, ASEC 1149.  pp.  75-101.

Ruschmeyer, O.R. and T.A. Olson.   1958.   Water- movements  and temperatures of
    western Lake Superior.  Univ. of Minnesota School of  Public Health,
    Minneapolis Publication.

Sydor, M.,  K.R.  Stortz, and W.R.  Swain.   1978.  Identification of contami-
    nant in Lake Superior through Landsat I data.  J. Great Lakes Res.
    4(2): 142-148.

Sydor, M.  1978.  Analysis of suspended  solids in lakes through use of
    Landsat data.   J.  Canadian Spectroscopy.    2(3): 91.
                                     196

-------
                                 SECTION 11

        PRINCIPLE  OF  ORGANIZATION OF AN AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEM

                              V.L. Pavelko1
    The  tasks  of control  of environmental quality are both local and global
in nature.   They range from the study of individual objects or even parts of
objects  to  planetary tasks, from evaluation of states in a narrow time sec-
tion to  historical  scale, from an individual process at some single trophic
level  to an ecologic environmental  system.   This directly requires that
large volumes  of both basic and supplementary information be processed, and
that large  amounts  of combinations  of various data be processed.  All of
this requires  the use of  computers.  A step beyond this level is the con-
struction and  study of ecologic mathematical models which is in and of it-
self a very cumbersome procedure, impossible without computers.

    Therefore,  a major problem of testing and control of the status of the
environment is  the  creation of an automated information system for water
quality  (AIS)  as a  section of a more general ecologic information system.

    The  flow of information determines the  external conditions of existence
of the processes which we are studying.  These,  in turn, define the func-
tion of  the source  of a pollutant and are a response to the condition of
water objects,  and  will be referred to as accompanying flows.  These flows
of information  are  related to hydrochemical subjects as follows:

    1.  "External conditions" - hydrologic  flow (discharge, speed
        and direction of  currents,  water temperature); meteorology
        (precipitation, solar radiation, direction and speed of the
        wind);  hydrobiologic data (the self-purifying capability of
        rivers), etc.;

    2.  "Source function" - data on waste waters, pollution of the at-
        mosphere and soil, hydrogeologic data, data on intentional and
        natural sedimentation, burial of pollutants (in cases of second-
        ary chemical pollution), hydrobiologic characteristics (in con-
        nection with eutrophication, oxygen starvation, etc.);
1 Hydrochemical  Institute,  192/3 Stachky Prospect, 344090 Rostov-on-Don,
 USSR.

                                    197

-------
    3.  "Response" - sanitary-hygienic data, hydrobiologic,  ichthyo-
        logic data, data on industrial water use, marine  hydrochemistry,
        etc.

    Many of these flows were used in AIS which had  been created  before  the
hydrochemistry AIS.  Therefore, the results were analyzed  and  compilation of
the best achievements were made, in order to minimize  the  time required to
translate the data banks created from one system of coding  and indexing to
another for purposes of merging the streams of information  in  various re-
search programs.

    This is equally true of the realization of various programs  based on the
hydrochemical branch in question.  For example, in  the USSR, the stream of
hydrochemical information includes a subsystem in the  nationwide service of
observation and testing of the level of pollution (OGSNK), the State Water
Cadastre (GVK), the State Water Report (GUB) and the Global Monitoring
System (GSMOS).

    The principles which were used in the creation  of AlS-hydrochemistry
system are summarized below.  Included are some of  the results obtained,
which are recommended as principles for the creation of a  global  monitoring
AIS, which it is expected will ultimately include all  nations, including,
the USSR and the USA.

1.  According to estimates, there are 2-5 million polluting substances  in
    the water, of which over 500 are toxic.  (Maximum  allowable  concentra-
    tion values having been established for them).  It is  estimated  that
    polluting substances increase annually by about 20,000 compounds.  Ap-
    proximately 100 of these are determined by manual methods.   However,
    the annual increase in analytical capabilities  for these substances is
    only 4-10.

    Some 10-15 components are able to be automatically determined, and the
    annual  increase in the number of such determinations  is about one.
    Therefore, as information is collected, for the immediate  future, GSMOS
    should be oriented to 100-300 water quality components, determined basi-
    cally in stationary and mobile laboratories.

    Result:  1.1  Hydrochemical codes containing the names of  components,
                  regardless of taxonomy, should have  a capacity of  up to
                  300 units (V.V. Tarasov 1971, 1974).

    Result:  1.2  Forms must be developed for recording of  information ob-
                  tained primarily manually.  The forms should be adapted
                  to manual and automatic punching.

2.  Manual  punching is a labor-consuming stage of automated data processing
    systems, the source of various errors, and the  reason  for  a  severe  de-
    crease  in the timeliness of automated information  systems.   Therefore,
    the volume of punching should be greatly minimized without reducing the
    information content of the data entered in the  computer.


                                    198

-------
Information is universally suitable for the  solution  of  various  esti-
mates, predictions and other tasks, if the initially  processed data  and
the results of analysis are stored in a computer.   The storage of  more
generalized characteristics prevents the performance  of  a  number of
tasks.  Minimization of the volumes of information  to be punched and
stored should be achieved by classification  and formal methods of  reduc-
tion.

The classes used might be:  results of analysis  [x-j]  and the  correspond-
ing characteristics  fd-jj].  The results of analysis x-j can  be divided
into groups:  principal ions, gas composition, heavy  metals,  oil and
petroleum products, fertilizers, toxic substances,  etc.  Preliminary
subdivision into nondegradable and degradable  (self-purifying) sub-
stances may also be made.  There are other classifications—as to  type
of effect (organoleptic, persistent, toxic,  etc.);  type  of  biota on
which the substance acts, etc.  However, these classifications are not
of particular interest for the planning of the AIS, since  it  is  desir-
able to store all results of analysis of an  individual sample together.
Combining storage, search, and processing, though it  increases the cum-
bersomeness of the machine procedure involved, greatly increases the in-
formation content (both formal and inductive) of estimates  of the  status
(effect of completeness of results analyzed).

The characteristics  td-jj] should be divided  into constant  and variable.
The corresponding class characteristics can  be noted  in  service  labels.
Permanent characteristics include the name of the body of water, region,
nearby town, etc.  Variable characteristics  include the  list  of  observed
components, date and depth of sampling, etc.  Permanent  characteristics
should be recorded in computer memory once in the form of a catalogue of
permanent characteristics (CPC), significantly minimizing the amount of
punching which must be done.

Variable characteristics should be coded in  the form  of  numbers  and
stored together with the numerical results of analysis.  The  composition
and taxonomy of the characteristic depend on the type of task to be  per-
formed which required their determination in the first place.  For
example, if the output result from GSMOS is  a prediction of the  pollu-
tion of water through the atmosphere locally (within  the limits  of a
region) in a time cross section, the characteristics  used  include  only
the names of chemical substances subject to  atmospheric  transfer and the
accompanying meteorologic characteristics.   If the  purpose  of the model
of atmospheric transfer is the spatial distribution of pollutants, we
must also know the geographic coordinates of the points.

If the self-purifying capability of a body of water in a preserve  is
studied, we must know the names of virtually all of the  hydrochemical
and hydrobiologic characteristics, and such  secondary characteristics as
water temperature, speed of current, etc.  The characteristics in  the
CPC might include landscape zones, characteristics of the climate,
underlying soils and rocks, altitude above sea level  and other charac-
teristics which depend on the task to be performed  using the  data  col-
lected.

                                 199

-------
4.  Characteristics have various weights  (Gaussian  distribution).   An error
    in storage or recording of one characteristic  leads  to  an  error in the
    interpretation of an individual word  or small  group  of  words,  while an
    error in another characteristic might result in the  introduction of er-
    rors to a large data file.  For example, an error  in  the code  "petro-
    leum products" might cause a given concentration for  a  given  date to be
    omitted not only from petroleum products, but  also from all other head-
    ings.  An error in the entry indicating the year of  observation would
    cause the loss of all observations for the entire year  (they  could not
    be retrieved according to the characteristic of the year).  Therefore,
    the data storage unit must include a  code protection  system, the reli-
    ability of which should be directly dependent on the  weight of each
    characteristic.

5.  Various hydrochemical components have different precision  in terms  of
    methods of analysis and natural variability.  Therefore, the same fre-
    quency of observations leads to different errors in reflection of natu-
    ral trends from the observations (a space-time resolution  of an obser-
    vation system which is uniform with respect to all observed components
    becomes nonuniform).  This requires that as the observation system  is
    planned, various data reading intervals be assigned,  leading to obser-
    vations of equal accuracy.  This step simplifies their  processing and
    assures the highest reliability of output materials with the minimum
    cost of observation.  However, the varying frequencies  of  observations
    of different components leads to the  situation that each sampling date
    generates a different list of observed components.  This does  not allow
    a rigid model to be used to record the results of observations.

    For diffusion systems, it is more economical to record  the results of
    observations [x-j] together with the variable characteristics  [d-jj]  in
    the form of a polynomial:
              ,                lit           nun


    which can be subjected to various convolutions.

6.  The first convolution is that the characteristics  [d-jj] are removed  from
    the brackets, e.g., as follows:
T = dddX  +d    + ...  + d     d    + dm+1
                                                    dx2 +  ...)...).

    This means in practice that for a given sampling data (d]),  it  is pos-
    sible to record all the results of analysis of samples taken  on  this
    date, without repeating the date next to each determination.  The set of
    data for a certain observation year ([x-j]) may have a single  notation da
    in the observation file header for the year.  The file of data  for the
    entire period of observation for a given biologic observation station
    may have a single header—the station code d2, etc.  Obviously,  each
    information branch and each observation program should have  its  own
    code.
                                     200

-------
These convolutions may not achieve the global minimum of  the  volume  of
data stored, since one criterion used in data reduction is  convenience
of retrieval of the data necessary for performance of the main  tasks.

Result:  6.1  To optimize decision making in the creation of  a  monitor-
              ing AIS, technical requirements must be placed  on the
              GSMOS materials in terms of reliability, completeness,
              timeliness, need, etc.

In reduction of characteristics, the names of hydrochemical components
require that a semi-rigid entry standard is used.  The form carries  the
results of analysis of not one, but a large number of samples;  the
names of the components determined are entered  into the head  of the
form so that each form has a rigidly defined list of components, but
the heads of two different forms are nearly always different.   This  al-
lows the entry of one row of characteristics d, d1, d", ...,  for the
entire matrix (n x N) of data, where n is the number of components in a
sample, and N is the number of samples.  Secondly, binary coding is  used
to index the names of the components defined (Tarasov 1971).  The es-
sence of binary coding is that a list of names  of hydrochemical  compo-
nents is developed.  They are assigned codes in the following sequence.

     1, 2, 4, 10, 20, 40, 100, 200, 400, 1000,  2000, 4000...

The results of analysis are entered into the forms in accordance with
this list, while the codes are summed and a so-called code  row  is thus
developed.

Example.  Lists of components and their codes

          Oxygen                                      1
          BOD5                                        2
          Petroleum products                          4
          Phenols                                    10
          Surfactants                                20
          NH4                                        40
          N03                                       100
          NO2                                       200
          DDT                                       400
          HCCH                                     1000
          Cl                                       2000
          Cu                                       4000
          Zn                                      10000
          Ni                                      20000

If the form contains:
                                 201

-------
                                   Sample
             02    BODs    Phen     NH4    NOs    N02    DDT      Cl
1
2
3
X
X
-
X
X
X
-
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
-
™
-
X
X
                    XX                             X

    the code row of the form consists of these names.

              02                                          J
              BOD 5                                        2
              Phenols                                    10
              NH4                                        40
              NO 2                                       200
              DDT                                       400
              Cl                                       4000
                                                       4753

    which, after addition, yields the code 4753.  This value unambiguously
    decodes the names of the elements in the matrix.

    This coding method allows all combinations of 8 x 37 = 296 different
    hydrochemical components to be stored in eight 37-bit memory locations.
    These eight words of the code line relate to virtually 100 elements of
    the matrix.  Therefore, where n = 30 and N = 30, the amount of memory
    expended in recording of variable characteristics (names of components)
    is a fraction of 1 percent of the volume of useful information, and thus
    reduces the volume of punching to less than half.

8.  Since modern computer central processers operate very rapidly, while
    peripheral information input-output devices operate comparatively
    slowly, it is desirable to record only the initial quantities, produc-
    ing the intermediate values in the computer by computation.

    Taken together, all of these suggestions allow the volume of informa-
    tion punched and stored in the computer to be reduced by approximately
    a factor of 12, without loss of information contents.  This greatly de-
    creases the cumbersomeness of manual operations, input-output functions,
    data search and retrieval operations.

9.  Preparation of data for punching, the punching operation, review and
    correction of data may require one or two orders of magnitude more time
    than the actual machine processing.  This requires a cautious attitude
    toward the organization of operations.  It is suggested that the initial
    data be punched onto paper tape, allowing the use of a non-rigid form
    for recording of the initial data, and allowing transmission of data
    through communications channels.  Since operator fatigue depends on the
    time of continuous work (Figure 1), it is suggested that operations be


                                      202

-------
ro
o
CO
CO
CC
o
QC
DC
UU
U_
O
DC
LU
GO
                           10     11
                                   12      13
                                        TIME
14
                                                                                       a.
15     16      17
         Figure 1.  Variation  in number  of errors  v with time of continuous work t.  a) Work with one
                            large break; b) Work with numerous shorter breaks.

-------
     organized according to plan "B" which reduces  the  number  of errors
     significantly, and generally increases the productivity of  labor.

10.  Since visual testing of the results of punching  using  a control  tape or
     computer printout requires intensive attention,  and the reading  of
     large numbers of correct entries unavoidably reduces attention,  it  is
     suggested that double punching be used (by two operators  independent-
     ly), with the punch tapes checked by the computer.  If the  relative
     number of errors for individual punching is p  =  0.5 percent,  the pro-
     bability of simultaneous appearance of an error  on two punched tapes
     in the same location is p-, x P2 = 0.000025, while  the  probability of
     appearance of an error in the same digit of a  given word  and  the pro-
     bability that the error in this word will be identical  is negligible.

     After machine verification of the two punched  tapes for agreement, the
     technician checks only the words which disagree  and gives the keypunch
     operator instructions for corrections of both  punched  tapes,  after
     which they are tested once more.

11.  Manual entry of information produced on forms, punching,  and  recording
     from the temporary information form to computer memory should be per-
     formed without preliminary sorting of data, as the results  of analysis
     come in.  This freedom levels the work load on testers, and allows the
     process of systematization to be automated.  The short  period of time
     between receipt of data and entry and testing of the data in the com-
     puter allows some of the erroneous results of  analysis  to be  cor-
     rected.

12.  Machine testing of information recorded in a form  should  include the
     performance of logic and calculation procedures.   Logical testing
     checks such relationships as the number of hours (not  over  24) re-
     corded, such as the time of taking a sample, the depth  of the body of
     water (no less than the sampling depth), equality  of the  sum  of  anions
     and cations, etc.

     Calculation procedures presume 1) that the results of  analysis will
     fall within certain tolerance limits determined  by retrospective exami-
     nation of information, 2) that relationships between certain  components
     will be maintained in multidimensional statistical models,  and 3) that
     deviations from the approximating surface will be  statistically  hetero-
     geneous, etc.  As a result of machine testing, data are classified as
     false or doubtful.  The flagged machine results  can be  conveniently
     printed in a form identical to the input form.  A  final decision as to
     whether data flagged by the computer are bad or  good,  as well as cor-
     rection of some of the bad data, are the job of  a  hydrochemical  spe-
     cialist, in combination with the analytic technician who  performed the
     analysis.

13.  If nonsystematic punching of tapes is used (contents of forms),  a tem-
     porary catalogue (TC) should be made, containing the label  "sample" and
     the address of the location of the sample in peripheral storage. The
     TC has been used for rapid retrieval of the necessary  information for

                                     204

-------
     systematization  of  the  data  (according to dates,  depths and sampling
     locations).  The identifying  code  used to mate the information recorded
     and the  data of  the TC  (and,  subsequently, with the CPC) could be the
     sampling  location,  e.g.,  the  geographic coordinates of the station, the
     point  of  a  vertical line  unambiguously defining the location of the
     point  where the  information was  read.

14.   The sampling location may have  various types  of tie-ins depending on
     the type  of task being  performed.   For example, the geographic coordi-
     nates, the  distance from  the  mouth of  a river, the distance from local
     landmarks (bridge,  cliff, waterfall, dock, etc.)  may be used.   The form
     should contain one  type of tie-in  which can be numerically expressed,
     e.g.,  geographic coordinates.   The other types should be stored in the
     CPC (the  TC and  CPC should be included in the identifying code).

15.   Systematization  of  data before  long-term storage  or before use can be
     performed by various systems.   The selection  of a plan for systematiza-
     tion  depends on  the type  of tasks  performed,  which should also be in-
     cluded in the technical assignment for the AIS.

     The first (or main) systematization should provide for convenient per-
     formance  of priority tasks.   It  is possible to store initial data using
     several  models  (systems), each  of  which is convenient for its  own range
     of tasks.  The expediency of  storage using several models can  be easily
     established by technical  and  economic  calculations.

16.   In addition to the  storage of initial  data, it is also possible to
     store  summary results,  if they  are used for systematic performance of
     certain  tasks.   The desirability of storing files of summary data must
     also  be  determined  by engineering-economic calculations.

17.   To solve  each class of  problems, retrieval files  (RF) of characteris-
     tics  are  formed  from the  CPC.   Each class of  tasks should correspond
     to its own  RF.   The RF  also  includes the necessary list of characteris-
     tics  based  on the model,  which  is  oriented to the performance  of a
     given  range of tasks.   All of this facilitates retrieval and processing
     of the necessary information.

18.   Systematized data for  long-term  storage are standardized, equipped with
     service  labels and  stored in  the form  of magnetic or binary microfilm,
     and standardized by means of  a  special data description language.
     Models are  developed using information compression techniques, leading
     to significant savings  of machine  time.

19.   Processing  algorithms may include:

     - estimates of states based on  various lists  of components (independ-
      ently for each component),  made  up for fixed periods of observation;
     - combined  estimates of states  based on the entire list of observed
      components;
     - comparative estimates of states  at various  observation points;
     - determination  of  trends at  various frequency levels of variability;

                                     205

-------
     - determination of local time anomalies;
     - prediction of hydrochemical states;
     - a combined estimate of states for all media  to  be  controlled;
     - transfer between media;
     - identification of anomalies with sources of  pollution;
     - combined prediction for all media tested;
     - warnings of increasing pollution and the possibility  of  unfavorable
       after-effects.

     These algorithms, presumed to be the purpose of organization  of moni-
     toring, are in various stages of development in the  USSR.

20.  The creation of the monitoring AIS requires the selection  of  intelli-
     gent proportions for standardization of codes, the organization of data
     bases, internal and external software, the class  of  computers  used and
     algorithmic languages.  This will  determine both  the success  of indi-
     vidual units of specific subsystems of the AIS, and  the effectiveness
     of functioning of these subsystems.  Therefore, their performance is of
     primary significance in the task of mass production  of mathematical
     models (both particular hydrochemical  models and  general ecologic
     models),  which is the technical  and theoretical basis of the  problem of
     storage and effective utilization  of the resources of the  biosphere.


REFERENCES

Tarasov, V.V.   1971.  One method of information storage.  Tr. NIIAK, No. 77,
    Moscow.

Tarasov, V.V.,  V.V. Pugolovkin and V.L.  Pavelko.  1974.  Coding of  informa-
    tion for computer storage.  Ekspress-informatsiya,  Obninsk, No. 4(24).
                                    206

-------
                                 SECTION 12

             A MULTI-LAYERED NESTED GRID MODEL OF LAKE SUPERIOR

                         G.J. Oman and M. Sydor 1


INTRODUCTION

    Lake Superior is the largest, cleanest, deepest, and coldest of  the
Great Lakes.  The size and complex bathymetry of Lake Superior pose  serious
obstacles when attemping to understand lake dynamics.  Numerical modeling
and remote sensing provide relatively easy means of studying  large bodies  of
water.   The art of numerical modeling has developed to the point where it
has been able to correctly predict large scale circulation patterns  in the
Great Lakes.  An understanding of the physical processes occurring in Lake
Superior will probably best be achieved by means of numerical modeling in
conjunction with remote sensing data and direct measurements  made on the
lake.

    A variety of numerical techniques exist for modeling large bodies of
water.   Several authors have attempted to assess the state of the art in
numerical modeling of the Great Lakes (Lick 1976; Katz and Schwab 1976;
Cheng et^ aj[. 1976).   In addition, techniques used in atmospheric and oceano-
graphic models have  potential applications to the Great Lakes (Paul  and Lick
1979).   A review of  existing three-dimensional Great Lakes models is under-
taken to find an appropriate model for Lake Superior.  The decision  was made
to first develop and verify an isothermal model before dealing with  the much
more difficult task  of simulating stratified flows.


GREAT LAKES MODELS

    Simons (1973) developed a free surface model which he used to simulate
storm surges on Lake Ontario (Simons 1974, 1975, 1976) and in the Baltic Sea
(Simons 1978).  Katz and Schwab (1976, 1978) also used Simons' model to pre-
dict currents in Lake Michigan.  The model employs grid A+B shown in Figure
1, which consists of two independent grids staggered in space and time.
This grid permits use of centered differences in space and time for  terms  in
the equations of motion which govern seiche oscillations.  Since both compo-
nents of velocity are defined at the same point, terms for the Coriolis
force can be evaluated using centered semi-implicit time differences which

^Department of Physics, University of Minnesota, Duluth, Minnesota 55812.


                                    207

-------
                                                          B

k+3/2
k+1 <
k+i/2
<
-1/2
k-i <





t . t

)(



j 	 (
k *i/o — • — <
	 k-tl

+1/2 	 *
5 	 .... if
kl fn
-1/2 • 	 •
1

II
II

II
II
      j-1   j-1/2  J     J+12 i + I
               A + B
k+3/2




k+i    o




k+i/2




k      o




k-i2




k-i     o
H    j-1 2  j     j+l/i j+1   j+3/->
                                        k-i
                                             j-1         j
                     j+l
                Figure  1.   Grids  used  in  various  models.
                                     208

-------
assure both numerical  accuracy and computational stability.  Forward  time
differences are used for diffusion.  This model permits any number of  fixed
permeable layers of variable thickness and may be altered to employ moveable
impermeable layers.

    Free surface models require very short time steps because they take  into
consideration fast-moving gravity waves.  In Simons' model, the computation
time is reduced by separating internal and external modes of oscillation.
This separation is accomplished by first summing the equations of motion
over the vertical axis to separate out the external gravity waves.  Then,
appropriate differences between layers are taken to filter out fast moving
gravity waves.  In this way, external gravity waves are integrated using a
short time step, while internal waves which determine vertical current pro-
files are integrated using a much longer time step.

    This model treats  both inertial and seiche modes of oscillation well.
Its main drawback is grid dispersion.  The two solutions on subgrids A and B
of Figure 1 are only weakly coupled.  Because the two subgrids are staggered
in space, the two nearly independent solutions provided by them may begin to
differ appreciably as  time progresses.  This possibility appears particular-
ly ominous for complex bathymetry.

    Lick and his associates at Case Western Reserve University have deve-
loped a number of different models of lake currents (Lick 1976).  Included
are steady state models (Gedney and Lick 1970, 1971, 1972; Gedney et al.
1973), free surface constant density models (Sheng and Lick 1975, Sheng
1975), and rigid lid models (Paul and Prahl 1971; Paul and Lick 1973,  1974,
1975).  Sheng ejt aj_. (1978) later developed an improved free surface model.

    The earlier free surface model used a single horizontal grid like  grid A
in Figure 1.  Centered space differences were used for all terms.  A forward
backward time differencing scheme was used in which all terms in the momen-
tum equations were stepped forward in time and water levels were calculated
using the new transports.  Internal and external modes were not separated
and advection of momentum was ignored.  The more recent free surface model
uses grid C, shown in  Figure 1.  Internal and external modes are separated
and advection of momentum is included.  This later model represents in-
ertial and fundamental seiche oscillations well.  Two point averaging  is
needed to calculate terms describing gravity waves.  This averaging reduces
the effective spatial  resolution of the model and could give rise to false
two grid space gravity waves.  The four point averaging needed to calculate
vertical velocities might also poorly represent vertical advection over  com-
plex bottom topography.

    The rigid lid variable density model also employs grid C shown in  Figure
1.  The rigid lid condition sets the vertical velocity at the surface  to
zero.  Although evaluation of the surface is not permitted, surface pressure
is defined.  Surface pressure is obtained by solving a Poisson's equation
derived from cross differentiating the momentum equations and applying the
rigid lid condition.  Surface pressure corresponds to water level oscilla-
tions in free surface  models, except that gravity waves are eliminated.
The rigid lid condition, in effect, filters out gravity waves.  Thus,  rigid

                                     209

-------
lid models may use much  longer time  steps  and  require considerably less com-
putation time.  Sheng et_ aj_.  (1978)  have shown  for  both  constant and vari-
able winds that currents from rigid  lid and  free  surface models display very
similar long term trends.

    Both the free surface and rigid  lid models  developed at Case Western
Reserve employ the stretched coordinate system  (Freeman  et_ a]_.  1972).   The
vertical coordinate z is transformed to the  sigma coordinate a by dividing
by depth.  At each grid  point currents are given  at  specified values of a.
In the transformed coordinate system, each grid point have the  same depth
and the same number of layers.  This greatly reduces  programming complex-
ities and assures adequate vertical  resolution  of currents at all  points.
The main problems are poor resolution of surface  layers  in deep water  and
in shallow water excessively thin  layers which  require  implicit integra-
tion of vertical diffusion.

    Another rigid lid model was developed  by Bennett  (1977).   Bennett's
model employs a single grid lattice  like grid A in  Figure 1.   The  momentum
equations are cross-differentiated using the rigid  lid condition giving an
equation for the stream  function.  The momentum equations are stepped  for-
ward in time, ignoring surface pressure.   The new approximate currents are
used to calculate a new  stream function.   The currents are then corrected
for the neglection of surface pressure by  using the  new  stream  function.   In
this way, only one array is needed for the stream function and  each velocity
component.  Since the two components of current are  not  defined at the same
point in Bennett's grid, four point  averaging was necessary to  calculate the
Coriolis force.  This averaging gave rise  to spurious inertial  modes which
had to be controlled using excessively high  horizontal diffusion.

    Kizlauskas and Katz  (1974) developed a two  layer  model of Lake Michigan.
The two layers which represent the epilimnion and hypolimnion are  separated
by a moveable impermeable surface.   This model  would  only be applicable
after lake stratification.

    In addition to the models mentioned above,  numerical  techniques devel-
oped in simulating flows in estuaries, oceans,  and  atmospheres  have poten-
tial application in the  Great Lakes.  In particular,  semi-implicit time
integration techniques (Madala and Piacsek 1977;  Kwizak  and Robert 1971)
show promise for the Great Lakes  (Paul and Lick 1979).   Semi-implicit
schemes are much more complicated  but allow  much  longer  time steps and pro-
duce much smoother results.  With  a  few modifications, a three-dimensional
estuary model developed  by Leendertse (Leendertse et.  _al_.  1973,  1975a,  1975b)
would also be applicable to the Great Lakes.  This  model  employs two grids
like grid A in Figure 1  staggered  in time.   A pressure gradient averaging
technique used in meteorological models (Schoenstadt  and Williams  1976;
Brown and Campana 1978)  could also be used to almost  double the maximum al-
lowable time step used in explicit,  centered time integrations.
                                     210

-------
THE MODEL

    In developing a numerical model of Lake Superior, a number of  points  had
to be taken into consideration.  Since model verification would be  based
largely upon recorded water levels and remote sensing observations  of major
and minor storms, a free surface model seemed more appropriate.  Rigid  lid
models are more useful for modeling extended periods of time, i.e., several
weeks or more.   At the present time, such an effort would be hard  to verify.
The complex bathymetry and highly variable thermal structure of Lake
Superior can be handled more conveniently with layers of fixed depth, let-
ting only the bottom layer vary in thickness.  When using layers of fixed
depth, the surface layer also corresponds more closely to the layer seen  by
remote sensing.  Implicit and explicit time differencing should be  con-
sidered.  At the present stage of development, only explicit techniques have
been considered.  Finally, in order to assure adequate spatial solution in
regions of interest, either a variable grid or a nested grid model should
be used.  The latter is used in the present model.

    A number of explicit numerical integration techniques exist for solving
the equations of motion for geophysical fluids.  A number of authors have
analyzed these  various methods (Fischer 1965; Grammeltvedt 1969; Matsuno
1966).  These various techniques have desirable smoothing properties, but
none of them are more accurate or more efficient than centered time dif-
ferencing.  Computational modes may develop with centered time differencing,
but these can be controlled using half time step starting procedures and
periodic explicit smoothing operators.  In addition, a pressure gradient
averaging technique proposed by Shuman nearly doubles the maximum  allowable
step for centered differences.

    A lattice like grid A in Figure 1 permits centered differences  in both
space and time  for terms associated with gravity waves.  If a single grid is
used, centered  differences for the Coriolis force are not possible.  Forward
differencing of this term can lead to computational instability (Fischer
1959).  A second identical lattice staggered in time is often used to solve
this problem.  In Simon's model, this second lattice was also staggered in
space.  This method raises the possibility of grid dispersion.  In the pre-
sent model, the second grid is staggered in time but not in space.  This  is
the grid structure used by Leendertse (1973).  Simons also used tins struc-
ture in modeling the Baltic Sea (Simons 1978).  As Simons pointed out, the
main problem with this grid is the development of spurious inertia! modes
associated with four point averaging used in calculating the Coriolis terms.
This can be controlled by increasing horizontal diffusion.  Another possi-
bility would be to use grid C of Figure 1 which would permit centered semi-
implicit evaluation of the Coriolis terms.  However, centered time differ-
ences for gravity waves seem to lead to computational difficulties on this
grid (Sheng, personal communication).

    The Lake Superior model is similar to Leendertse's estuary model
(Leendertse e_t  aj_.  1973, 1975a, 1975b).  It ignores vertical accelerations
and assumes pFessure varies hydrostatically.  It has a free surface and uses
constant eddy coefficients to represent vertical and horizontal diffusion.
Horizontal and  vertical advection of momentum are represented using an

                                     211

-------
energy conserving formulation.   Centered  space differences are used for all
terms.  Centered time differences  are  used  for all  terms except horizontal
and vertical diffusion which  are approximated  using forward differences.  A
quadratic bottom friction  is  used.

    The equations are given by  Leendertse and  are  listed in Appendix A.
Five  important modifications  were  made  to Leendertse's model.   First, the
model was made isothermal.  Leendertse's  complex formulations  for vertical
momentum exchange was replaced  by  simple  vertical  diffusion with constant
diffusivity.  Second, the  depth  of the  bottom  layer was allowed to vary.
Following Simons (1973), the  equations  of motion were  integrated from
either the bottom of the lake or the depth  of  a given  layer to either the
surface or the bottom of the  next  layer.  Third, a  pressure gradient aver-
aging technique originally proposed by  Shuman  was  added.  Fourth, internal
and external modes of oscillations were separated.   Fifth,  provisions were
made  for saving model parameters along  open  boundaries to be used later on
nested subgrids.

    Shuman pressure gradient  averaging  is a  very simple technique capable of
nearly doubling the maximum allowable time  step for centered time differ-
encing of barotropic waves (Schoenstadt and  Williams 1976;  Brown and Campana
1978).  In the equations of motion, time  centered pressure  gradient terms
associated with water level oscillations  are replaced  by a  simple average
over  three consecutive time s^ps.  For example, at the nth time step the
pressure gradient in the x-direction Px is  normally given by Equation (1) in
which £ is water level and y  the acceleration  of gravity.
    Pn = g(
     x   yvgx
                                                              (1)
This is simply replaced by Eauation  (2) below, where  8  is  a constant which
may vary between 0 and  .25     che case of  no  advection  of  momentum
            3£\n
         g[(1-2. x a)()
a
                                   n-1
+ (i-^
                                                              (2)
The term  (-r-)    is available at time step n because  in  centered time dif-
ferencing    water levels at step n+1 are derived  from vertical  velocities
at step n and water levels at step n-1.
    The separation of internal and external modes  was  accomplished as fol-
lows.  First, the equations of motion were  integrated  from bottom to surface
in^order to get an equation which included  the  effects of  gravity waves.
This external oscillation mode was integrated using  a  very short time step.
Next, equations of motion at consecutive  layers were subtracted to eliminate
the external gravity wave.  For example,  consider  the  x components of velo-
city Uk and Uk+-| at the k and k+1 layers.   The  equation of motion can be
written
= R,
                                                                        (3)
                                     212

-------
where t represents time, h layer thickness, g acceleration  of  gravity,  C
water level,  and R the remaining terms.  Multiplying  (3)  by hk+1  and  (4) by
hk and subtracting eliminates the pressure gradient term  and hence  the
gravity wave.   Replacing the time derivatives by finite differences gives
                        - <; n
                        - Sk

where n refers to the time step.  The form of S|<  depends  on  the  kind  of
time differences used for the internal wave.  In any  case,  it  is  evaluated
using values at time step n and earlier.  If there are M  layers,  this  pro-
cedure gives M-l equations in M unknowns.  The equations  used  to  derive the
velocity shears are stepped forward once using an internal  time step which
is an integral number N times the time step used for  the  external  depth-
integrated model.  The external mode is then stepped  forward  N times to give
the total  transport T at the next internal time n+1 .  The  provides  an  MiQ-
equation in Uk11"1"1 ,  namely.
             = T                                                        (6)


Equations (5) and (6) can be readily solved by elimination for U|<.   Bottom
friction is  then calculated at the new internal time step and used  in  cal-
culating the external mode.  In this manner internal and external modes  are
treated separately and efficiently while still being allowed to  interact
with one another.

    The addition of open water boundaries and nested subgrids introduces  a
completely new set of problems and modeling decisions.  Upon reaching  the
boundary between coarse and fine grid, waves can reflect and generate  false
computational modes or false gravity waves.  Proper formulation  of  open
water boundary condition can prevent this.  Grids of differing size can  be
coupled using either one-way or two-way interaction schemes.  In one-way
interaction  schemes (Chen and Miyakoda 1974; Miyakoda  and Rosati 1977)  the
entire lake  is first modeled on a coarse grid ana model parameters  on  the
boundary between grids are saved.  The saved parameters are  interpolated  in
space and time and used as open boundary values in the fine  grid.   In  this
method, information is allowed to pass from the coarse grid  to the  fine  grid
but not vice versa.  In two-way interactions (Harrison and Elsberry 1972;
Browning et_ aj_.  1973) both fine and coarse grid models are integrated  simul-
taneously.   At the boundary between grids, information needed by the coarse
grid from the fine grid is obtained using values from  the fine grid and  vice
versa.  In  this  way, full interaction between grids is possible.

    In order to  reduce computer memory requirements, the one-way interaction
scheme is used in the Lake Superior model.  Two-way interaction  schemes  are
necessary only when processes occurring in the nested  subgrid have  profound

                                      213

-------
influences on  large scale circulation,  as  for  instance in hurricane model-
ing.  In the program the location of  any number  of open boundaries are read
and model parameters along these boundaries  are  saved for latter fine grid
calculations.  These stored model parameters are then interpolated in time
using a four-point formula given by Wang and Halpern  (1970).  Space inter-
polation is achieved using a method which  approximates linear interpolation
of currents but assures that the total  normal  and tangential transport and
the total surface elevation along the boundary is the same in both grids.   A
local boundary smoothing procedure proposed  by Chen and Miyakoda (1974) can
be used if necessary.


EXAMPLE:  RESULTS FOR LAKE SUPERIOR

    For purposes of illustration the model was run for a 24 hour periods for
easterly and westerly winds on Lake Superior,  Figure  2.  A 10 km square
grid and time steps of 12 minutes for the  internal  mode and 90 seconds for
the external mode were used.  Vertical  and horizontal  diffusivities were .01
m2/s and 10 m2/s respectively.  A constant wind  stress of .675 nt/m2 and a
constant Chezy coefficient of 50 (m/s2)-l/2 were used.  In these runs, four
layers were used with interfaces at depths of  20 m,  50 m, 110 m.

    Figures 3-6 show surface currents for  easterly winds  after 3,  9,  15,
and 24 hours respectively.  The currents in the  central regions of the lake
are clearly rotating in a manner attributable  to interaction of wind  stress
and Coriolis force.  As expected, currents in  the lower layers show a simi-
lar rotation in the opposite direction.  Figures 7-9  show currents in the
subsurface layers after 24 hours.  Return  currents  are clearly evident in
deep trenches parallel to the wind.  The results for  westerly winds were
similar except current directions were  reversed.   Downwelling and  upwelling
for easterly and westerly winds are shown  in Figures  10 and 11 respectively.
Comparing Figures 8 and 9 with Figure 10 provides evidence that for constant
easterly winds, taconite tailings dumped into  the lake at Silver Bay would
be downwelled and carried along the bottom toward the  south shore  where they
would be upwelled.  Isolated patches of tailings have  been detected in this
region using Landsat data (Oman and Sydor  1977).

    The model was also run on a 2.5 kilometer  nested  subgrid in extreme
western Lake Superior.  Surface and second layer currents for easterly winds
after 24 hours are shown in Figures 12  and 13  and for  westerly winds  in Fi-
gures 14 and 15.   For both winds, surface  currents  in  the extreme  western
reach of the lake seem to form circulation cells.   These  cells seemed to
reach steady state quickly and are consistent  with  observations by
Ruschmeyer et_ a]_.  (1961) which indicated that  nutrients from the Duluth-
Superior Harbor often remain trapped within  15 to 30  km of the harbor for
extended periods  of time.  The return current  in layer 2  for easterly winds,
Figure 13,  corresponds exactly with resuspension plumes observed in Landsat
images.  The hooking return current in  layer 2 for  westerly winds  is  also
consistent with Landsat observations of westerly wind  events.
                                     214

-------
IX)
(—»
en
                                  N
                                                     KM
                         Figure 2.  Map of Lake Superior showing regions  deeper than  200 m.

-------
no
i—'
cr>
                                        East  Wind

                                        Currents

                            One  Grid  Space =  50-0 cm/sec

                            Layer 1,   0 to 20.0 meters

                                    Time =  0/0300:00
                  Figure 3.  Surface currents after 3 hours of constant easterly winds.

-------
ro
                                        East  Wind
                                         Currents
                             One Grid Space = 50.0 cm/sec
                               Layer  1,   0 to  20.0 meters
                                    Time = 0/0900:00
                  Figure 4,  Surface currents after 9 hours of constant easterly winds.

-------
ro
co
                                           East  Wind
                                            Currents
                               One Grid Space = 50-0 cm/sec
                                 Layer 1, 0 to  20-0 meters
                                       Time = 0/1500:00
                   Figure 5.  Surface currents after 15  hours of constant easterly winds

-------
ro
                                            East Wind
                                             Currents
                                One Grid Space = 50-0 cm/sec
                                  Layer   1,   0 to 20-0 meters
                                        Time = 1/0000:0
                   Figure 6.  Surface currents after 24 hours of constant easterly winds.

-------
                          East  Wind
                          Currents
              One Grid Space =25.0 cm/sec
                Layer 2, 20-0 to 50-0 meters
                      Time = 1/0000:00
Figure 7.  Currents in layer 2 after 24 hours of constant easterly winds,

-------
(Ni
ro
                                            East Wind
                                            Currents
                                One  Grid Space ~ 25-0 cm/sec
                                 Layer  3,  50 to  110-0 meters
                                        Time = 1/0000:0
                  Figure 8.   Currents  in layer 3 after 24 hours  of constant easterly winds,

-------
Figure 9.   Currents  in  layer 4  after  24  hours of constant easterly winds.

-------
ro
r\3
CO
         Figure 10.  Layer 2 downdwell ing  in western Lake Superior after 24 hours of constant easterly
                                winds.  One grid space corresponds to 1 mm/sec.

-------
ro
ro
           Figure 11.  Layer 2 upwelling in western Lake Superior after 24 hours of constant easterly
                                 winds.  One grid space corresponds to 1  mm/sec.

-------
ro
ro
en
                            EAST WIND
                            CURRENTS
                      ONE  GRID SPACE = SO CM/5
                      LAYER 1,  0 -20 METERS
                            THE  1/QOOO:00
           Figure 12.  Surface  currents in nested subgrid after 24  hours of constant  easterly winds

-------
cr>
                             EAST WIND
                             CURRENTS
                        ONE GRID  SPACE = 25 CM/S
                        LAYER 2,  20-50 METERS
                             TIME 1/0000--00
           Figure 13.  Layer 2  currents in nested subgrid after 24 hours  of constant easterly winds,

-------
             WEST WIMD
Figure 14.   Surface currents in nested subgrid  after 24 hours of constant westerly winds

-------
ro
ro
CO
              ONE GRID      s= 25

              LAYER 2, 20-50

                   TIME 1/0000:
''..•..•:•: <<•>'>
         Figure 15. Layer 2 currents in nested subgrid after 24 hours of constant westerly winds.

-------
REFERENCES

Bennett,  J.R.   1977.   A three  dimensional  model of Lake Ontario's summer
    circulation.   I.  Comparison with observations.  J. Phys. Oceanogr.
    7:  591-601.

Brown,  J.A.  and K.  Campana.   1978.   An economical fine differencing system
    for numerical  weather  prediction.   Mon.  Weather Rev.  106: 1125-1136.

Browning, G.,  H.O.  Kreiss,  and J.  Oliger.   1973.   Mesh refinement.  Math.
    Comp.   27:  29-39.

Chen,  J.H.  and  K.  Miyakoda.   1974.   A nested grid computation for the baro-
    tropic  free surface atmosphere.   Mon.  Weather Rev.  102: 181-190.

Cheng,  R.T.,  T.M.  Powell  and T.M.  Dillon.   1976.   Numerical models of wind
    driven  circulation in  lakes.  Appl.  Math. Modeling.  1: 141-159.

Fischer,  G.   1959.   Ein numerisches  verfahren zun errechnung von windstau
    und gezeiten  in randmeeren.  Tell us.  11: 60-76.

Fishcer,  G.   1965.   A survey of finite-difference approximations to the
    primitive equations.   Mon. Weather Rev.   93:  1-10.

Freeman,  N.G.,  A.M. Hale,  and  M.B.  Danard.  1972.  A modified sigma equa-
    tions'  approach to the numerical modeling of Great Lakes hydrodynamics.
    J.  Geophys  Res.  77:  1050-1060.

Gedney, R.T.  and  W. Lick.   1970.  Numerical  calculations of the steady-state
    wind-driven currents  in Lake Erie.  Proc. 13th Conf. Great Lakes Res.
    pp. 829-838.

Gedney, R.T.  and  W. Lick.   1971.  Numerical  calc"lations of the wind driven
    current in  Lake Erie  and comparison with measurements.  Proc. 14th Conf.
    Great Lakes Res.   pp.  454-466.

Gedney, R.T.  and  W. Lick.   1972.  Wind-driven current in Lake Erie.  Proc.
    15th  Conf.  Great  Lakes Res.  pp. 2714-2723.

Gedney, R.T.,  T.B.  Molls,  and  W. Lick.  1973.  A simplified stratified lake
    model for determining  effects  of wind  variation and eddy diffusivity.
    Proc. 15th  Conf.  Great Lakes Res.   pp. 710-722.

Grammeltvedt,  A.   1969.  A survey of finite-difference schemes for the
    primitive equations for a barotrophic  fluid.   Mon. Weather Rev.  97:
    384-404.

Harrison, E.J.  and  R.S. Elseberry.   1972.   A method for incorporating
    nested  finite  grids in the solution of systems of geophysical equations.
    J.  Atmos.  Science.  29:  1235-1245.
                                     229

-------
Katz, P.L. and 6.M. Schwab.  1976.  Currents  and pollutant  dispersion in
    ^Lake Michigan modeled with emphasis on the Calumet  Region.   Department
    of Information Engineering, University of Illinois  at Chicago Circle.

Kizlauskas, A.G. and P.L. Katz.  1973.  A two layer finite  difference model
    for flow in thermally stratified Lake Michigan.  Proc.  16th  Conf.  Great
    Lakes Res.  pp. 743-753.

Kwizak, M. and A.J. Robert.  1971.  A semi-implicit scheme  for grid  point
    atmospheric models of the primitive equations.  Mon. Weather Rev.  99:
    32-36.

Leende'rtse, J.J. R.C. Alexander and S.K. Liu.  1973.  A three-dimensional
    model for estuaries and coastal seas:  Volume I, Principals  of computa-
    tion.  The Rand Corporation.  R-1417-OURR.

Leendertse,. J.J. and S.K. Liu.  1975a.  A three-dimensional model for
    estuaries and coastal seas:  Volume II, Aspects of  computation.   The
    Rand Corporation.  R-1764-OWRT.

Leendertse, J.J., S.K. Liu and A.B. Nelson.  1975b.  A  three-dimensional
    model for estuaries and coastal seas:  Volume III,  The  interim program.
    The Rand Corporation.  R-1884-OWRT.

Lick, W.  1976.  Numerical models of lake currents.  Ecological  Research
    Series Report EPA-600/3-76-020.
                                                                       PI. -
Madala, R.V. and S.A. Piacsek.  1977.  A semi-implicit  numerical model for
    baroclinic oceans.  J. Computer Phys.  23: 167-178.                '

Matsuno, T.  1966.  Numerical integrations of the primitive equations  by a
    simulated backward difference method.  J. Meteorol. Soc. Japan.  44:
    76-84.

Miyakoda, K. and A. Rosati.  1977.  One-way nested grid models:  The  inter-
    face conditions and the numerical accuracy.   Mon. Weather Rev.   105:
    1092-1107.

Paul, J.F. and J. Prahl.  1971.  Experimental and numerical investigations
    of rectangular jet.  Proc. 14th Conf. Great Lakes Res.  pp.  607-617.

Paul, J.F. and W.J. Lick.  1973.  A numerical model for a three-dimensional
    variable-density jet.  Proc. 16th Conf. Great Lakes Res.  pp. 818-830.

Paul, J.F. and W.J. Lick.  1974.  A numerical model for thermal  plumes and
    river discharges.  Proc. 17th Conf. Great Lakes Res.  pp. 445-455.

Paul, J.F. and W.J. Lick.  1976.  Lake Erie international jet port model
    feasibility investigation, Report 17-6, Application of  three-dimensional
    hydrodynamic model to study effects of proposed jetport island on
    thermocline structure of Lake Erie.  Department of  Earth Sciences, Case
    Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

                                     230

-------
Paul,  J.F.  and  W.J.  Lick.   1979.  An efficient, implicit method for cal-
  '  cuTating  time dependent, free-surface hydrodynamic flows.  Proc. 22nd
    Conf.  Great Lakes Res.,  held at Rochester, New York, May 1979.

Ruschmeyer, O.R., T.A.  Olson and H.M. Bosch.  1961.  Lake Superior studies,
    1956-1961.   School  of  Public Health, University of Minnesota,
    Minneapolis.

Schoenstadt,  A.L. and R.T.  Williams.  1976.  The computational stability
    properties  of the Shuman pressure gradient averaging technique.  J.
    Computer  Phys.  21: 166-177.

Schwab,  G.M.  and  P.L. Katz.   1978.  Multiple-grid numerical simulation of
    transient near shore current in southwestern Lake Michigan:  Comparison
    with observations.   Proc. 21st Conf. Great Lakes Res., held at Univer-
    sity of Windsor, Ontario, May 9-11, 1978.

Sheng, Y.P.   1975.  Lake Erie international jetpnrt model feasibility in-
    vestigation,  Report 17-5, The wind driven currents and contaminant dis-
    persion in  the near shore of large lakes.  Department of Earth Sciences,
    Case Western  Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

Sheng, Y.P.  and W.J. Lick.   1976.  Currents and contaminant dispersion in
    the  nearshore region and modification by a jetport.  J. Great Lakes Res.
    & 402-414.
Sheng,  Y.P.,
   f°putation
             W.J.  Lick,  R.T.  Gedney and  F.B.  Molls.   1978.   Numerical  com-
             of  three-dimensional  circulation in Lake Erie:   A comparison of
    a  free-surface  model  and  a rigid-lid model.   J.  Phys.  Oceanogr.   8:  713-
    727.
Simons,  T.J.   1973.   Development of three-dimensional numerical models of
    the  Great Lakes.   Scientific Series No. 12, Inland Waters Directorate,
    Canada Centre for Inland Waters, Burlington, Ontario, 1973.
Simons,  T.J.   1974.
    I:   Circulation
    523.
                     Verification
                    in  spring  and
                                  of  numerical
                                  early summer
 models  of  Lake  Ontario.   Part
.   J.  Phys.  Oceanogr.   4:  507-
Simons, T.J.   1975.   Verification  of numerical  models  of Lake Ontario.
    II:   Stratified  circulations  and temperature changes.   J. Phys.
    Oceanogr.   5:  98-110.

Simons, T.J.   1976.   Verification  of numerical  models  of Lake Ontario.
    III:  Long  term  heat  transports.   J.  Phys.  Oreanogr.  6:  372-378.
                                                                        Part
                                                                        Part
Simons, T.J.
    Te.llus.
              1978.  Wind
            30:  272-283.
                          driven circulations in the southwest Baltic.
Sydor,  M.  and  G.  Oman.   1977.   Effects of nemadji runoff on Lake Superior.
    Final  Report,  U.S.  EPA Grant No.  R-005286-01 , Department of Physics,
    University of Minnesota,  Duluth.
                                    231

-------
Wang, H.H. and P.  Halpern.   1970.  Experiments with a regional fine mesh
    prediction model.   J.  Appl.  Meteorol.  9: 545-553.
                                    232

-------
                                 APPENDIX A

                      THE FINITE DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS


    The  finite  difference equations listed in this Appendix are  based  large-
ly upon  the  work  of Leendertse (1973, 1975).  The equations of motion  for  an
incompressible  fluid are given in Equations (A-l)-(A-4).   In these equa-
tions,  vertical  accelerations have been ignored and the hydrostatic  assump-
tion imposed;  Equation (A-3).  The Coriolis parameter is also assumed  con-
stant.   As Simons (1973) points out, these equations can be integrated over
the kth layer  to  give Equations (A-5)-(A-7).

    If  layer thickness varies, terms involving products of the horizontal
velocity and partial derivatives of layer thickness are absorbed  into  the
vertical velocity term w.  In these equations, the horizontal stress terms
are approximated  by simple diffusion of layer transport.   The vertical
stress  term  at  the surface is given by a quadratic function of wind, Equa-
tion (A-8),  and at the bottom by a quadratic function of current, Equations
(A-9)-(A-10).   Stresses between layers are approximated by simple diffusion.

    Before giving the finite difference equations, the finite difference
operators listed  in Equations (A-ll)-(A-15) must be defined.  First, all
model  parameters  must be defined on a grid lattice as in Equation (A-ll).
In the  present  model, a spatially staggered grid is used which is ideally
suited  for solving the continuity equation.  In this grid  only normal  compo-
nents  of velocity are defined at the six sides of a rectangular  box  which
constitute a grid cell.  Thus, the u, v and w components of velocity are de-
fined  at half  integral values of i, j and k respectively.  Averaging and
finite  differencing operators in the x-direction are given in Equations
(A-12)  and  (A-13).  Similar operators are defined in the Y and Z  directions
and in  time.  Future and past values are signified as shown in Equations
(A-14)  and  (A-15).

    The  finite  difference equations which form the basis of the  model  are
listed  in Equations (A-16)-(A-19).  Stress terms between layers  are  given  by
Equations (A-20)  and (A-21).  These equations were then modified  as  des-
cribed  by the main text.


3u   s(uu)
9t   ~9x~~
                                     233

-------
av + aw + ^ + ajvjl + fu + ] | . J (V +   B +   p, . „    (A.2)
                   2E + pg = 0                                         (A-3)



                   iM + 1 • »                                    <*-<>


Where:   t is time
         x, y are coordinates in the horizontal plane
         z is the vertical coordinate, positive upwards
         u, v, w are velocity components in the x, y, z directions
         f is the Coriolis parameter
         p is the density of the fluid
         p is pressure
         T represents the stress tensor
         g is the acceleration of gravity.
                                              fhv
                              ^
         1X7        1X7       1  8(hAX S)    1
           TX            X2       '      X dX    '
           T                                    p
                        + (Hy)kJk . (wv)    + fhu

              'k+%   ^p L   >k-Jg   p    9S	p 	—   ~ u        vn'u'



          ~ (hv) + (w)k_% - (w)k44g = 0                                (A-7)



where h is layer thickness, Ax, Ay are horizontal diffusion coefficients.



                   TQ = PCu"|u~                                          (A-8)



Where:  _p is the density of the moving fluid,
        u" is the mean wind speed,  and
        C is a drag coefficient.

                                     234

-------
^^p
                                                              (A-9)
  = pg	r
           r
                                                             (A-10)
                 F.. = F(iAx, jAy, h, , nAt)
                                           (A-ll)
                        i+^k + Fi-k) at  (^J.
                                           (A-12)
                                          (l.j.k)
                                           (A-13)
                F  = F
    n+1


    ijk



    n-1


    ijk
                                                            (A-14)
                                                            (A-15)
                                          at i, j, n
                                          (A-16)
6t(hXu) = - 6x(hxu ux) - 6 (Fv
               hx6z(1Jzwx)
                - g


                                         at  i + k,  j, k,  n    (A-17)
                              235

-------
                                at 1, j + %,  k}  n     (A-18)
5x(hxu)
6y(Fyv)
at i, j, k, n  +  1     (A-19)
       xz-
                                  at i
                                                                (A~20)
                                  at  i  j
                                                                (A-21)
                  236

-------
                                 SECTION 13

    A REVIEW OF SOME METHODS AND PARAMETERS USED  IN ASSESSING  EFFECTS  OF
                     WATER INTAKES ON FISH POPULATIONS

                          Richard L. Patterson1
INTRODUCTION

    It may be difficult to imagine that a water intake could  have  any  effect
whatsoever upon the status of a fish population.  Unlike fishermen who move
from place to place to improve their catch wherever  it may be found, or  un-
like low temperatures or low dissolved oxygen concentrations which exert
their effects over wide areas on survival of all eggs and larvae,  a water
intake remains in a fixed position and has the single function of  removing
water from the river, lake, reservoir, or estuary.   It does not pollute  the
waters around it and the only organisms that are affected in  any direct way
are those which happen to find themselves so close to the mouth of the in-
take that they are sucked into the intake canal.  It would therefore appear
that the only possible direct effect of a water intake upon a population
might be measured in terms of total numbers of organisms removed by the  in-
take or in terms of percentages of populations removed by the intake in  a
given year.  However, direct effects upon sections of the aquatic  habitat
may conceivably be triggered by withdrawal of excessive quantities of  water
which, in turn, may effect recruitment or survival of the species  inhabiting
the area.  If a water intake exhibits size or species selectively  in its
cropping of individuals the possibility of imbalance in food  chains might be
considered as an indirect effect.  The losses in new recruits in subsequent
years due to cropping of individuals in the present year is another type of
indirect effect that may be important for a given population.  Consequently,
the question of impact of a water intake upon fish populations becomes a
matter for investigation.  Reviewed below are some population parameters and
methods which are used to assess direct and indirect effects of water  in-
takes on fish populations.  Certain of the techniques are not widely known
due to the recent emphasis in assessing point sources of losses of fishes
from their habitats.  Although the natural assumption may be  that  impacts of
water intakes are "bad" there is nothing inherent in the methods or para-
meters reviewed below that requires possible impacts to be detrimental to
the populations.
^School  of Natural  Resources, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
                                    237

-------
NEED FOR HISTORICAL REVIEW

    Aquatic populations of the Great  Lakes  have  experienced the effects of
man's activities for the past one  hundred twenty years.   Wells and McLain
(1973) and Smith (1972) have described the  historical  trends in Great Lakes
fish stocks depressed by (a) exploitation due  to commercial fishermen, (b)
introduction of exotic species,  (c) accelerated  eutrophication, and (d)
other forms of pollution due to  a  variety of causes  related in one way or
another to industrialization and shoreland  and shoreline development.  When
evaluating the impacts of a particular factor  of fish  mortality (such as
power plant effects) on a fishery, this factor should  be viewed within the
context of the larger set of factors  whose  cumulative  net effects produced
the environmental conditions surrounding and mitigating  the effect of the
factor to be evaluated.

    Applying the above to the evaluation of effects  of water intakes as, for
example, power plant cooling water intakes which cause entrainment and im-
pingement of yellow perch populations of western Lake  Erie, commercial catch
data reported by Muth (1977) show the perch population to be in a depressed
condition in 1977 with production having declined  each year from 1973-1976.
Moreover, analyses of catches showed  that about  60 percent of the catch was
less than the 8.5 inch minimum size recommended  by the Lake Erie Technical
Committee on Yellow Perch as a management strategy to  protect the stocks.
The Ohio Division of Wildlife (1977)  also reported that  the majority of the
1973 year class in the Western Basin  (due to slow.er  growth) was sublegal.

    Except for increases in 1971 and  1972 yellow perch production in Lake
Erie has declined steadily since 1968.  Between  1952 and 1968 production
fluctuated considerably but the  overall trend was  upward.   Jobes (1952) re-
viewed yellow perch production in Lake Erie prior  to 1952 and found it to
be relatively low compared to the  1955-1968 period except for a few years
of high production in the 1930's.  The effects and implications of power
plant induced entrainment and impingement mortality  upon yellow perch in
western Lake Erie beginning in the early 1970's  should therefore be inter-
preted in light of a set of factors whose net effect produces a declining
population (due most likely to a combination of  overexploitation and ad-
verse habitat conditions resulting in poor year  classes  in recent years).
Such a trend suggests that the compensatory reserve  of the population may be
exhausted.  That is, if an additional amount of  the  population  is removed
each year beginning in a given year,  the population  reaches a point at which
it is unable to recover any part of this added loss.   A  declining population
in which small sizes predominate in the catch suggests that compensation for
additional removals of stocks whether by fishing,  natural  mortality, or en-
trainment and impingement may be slight at best.   Additional  losses to a de-
clining population could project it into a prolonged or  permanent state of
depression unless stresses are relaxed.  Yellow  perch  in the Great Lakes ap-
pear to be capable of recovering from severe stress  conditions  when those
conditions are removed so that the possibility of  its  extinction is not
seriously considered.
                                    238

-------
WATER INTAKES  AS A FACTOR IN FISH POPULATION DYNAMICS

    A box  and  arrow diagram, depicting flows of numbers or biomass of  a  fish
population  (Figure 1),  is a convenient tool for showing the standing crops
of subpopulations and their transfers which should be taken into  account  in
order to  conduct analyses of direct (same year) and long run  (subsequent
years) impacts of water-intake caused entrainment and impingement losses  to
a fish population and its associated fisheries.  Direct effects of entrain-
ment and  impingement mortality refer to immediate (same year) losses sus-
tained by  age  or size classes both separately and collectively including  the
egg state.   Direct effects also include percentage loss of larval production
and percent reduction of the young-of-year class caused by entrainment
losses to  the  larval stage.  An assessment of direct effects  is complicated
by (a) the  need to obtain larval production and natural mortality estimates
as well  as  estimates of standing crops of other size classes  and  (b) the
differential  impact that a particular water intake may exert  if it selec-
tively crops  size classes and the implications of this differential cropping
of size classes upon the percent reduction in the population.

    Longer  range or subsequent year-to-year effects are caused by losses of
fishes in  various size classes in earlier years.  Such subsequent year ef-
fects may  occur in the form of reduced numbers in different size classes,
reduced yields, changes in production rate of larvae per individual adult,
and changes in the natural mortality rate of larvae.  Longer  run effects may
be termed  indirect effects "to emphasize their separation in time from  im-
mediate or  direct effects.  Long run predicted effects of water intake
caused mortality may or may not be verifiable from direct measurements of
standing  crops in subsequent years, being a particularly difficult because
of (a) the  confounding of possible multiple causes of reduced population,
and (b)  the high statistical variability of estimates of standing crops.
Methods of  predicting long run impacts of water intake caused mortality re-
quire the  application of numerical simulation models of a fish population of
which there are a number of different types in use.  They can be  lumped  into
two groups  depending upon whether they simulate the differences in a popula-
tion (with  and without the presence of water intake caused mortality)
directly  in which case they are called equivalent adult models or whether
they simulate  the fish population without the presence of water intake
mortalities and again with additional losses caused by water  intakes.  The
use of numerical simulation models requires assumptions concerning fish be-
havior and  estimates of parameters such as female fecundity and compensatory
reserve of  the population.  Therefore, the assessment of long run impacts
of water  intake caused mortality upon a fish population has all the problems
of assessing  direct effects plus the additional ones mentioned above.


REVIEW OF  FACTORS NEEDED FOR ASSESSING DIRECT EFFECTS

Mortality Rates of Entrained Larvae

    Physiological effects of chemical, thermal, abrasive, pressure and shear
stresses encountered by individuals during passage through the power plant
cooling cycle  have been investigated and reported at various  symposia.

                                     239

-------
                                                                                    EGGS
ro
             yjy
                         LARVAE
                           x_y
                                 YOUNG-OF-YEAR
                                            c
1-YEAR OLDS
J>
                                                        c
            2-YEAR OLDS
                                      *v^r
                                                   • ^—r
                                                                     C
                        3-YEAR OLDS
                                                               •VJ<
                                                                                             C
                                                 M-YEAROLDS
                                                                                                    v_y
                                                                                                          NATURAL
                                                                                                         MORTALITY

                                                                                                            INTAKE
                                                                                                         ENTRAPMENT
                                                                                                         MORTALITY

                                                                                                            INTAKE
                                                                                                         IMPINGEMENT
                                                                                                         MORTALITY

                                                                                                          FISHING
                                                                                                         MORTALITY
                        Figure 1.  Box  and arrow  diagram summarizing  transfers  of fish biomass.

-------
(Saila et^aj_.  1975; Jensen et^ a_l_. 1977).  These studies provide  understand-
ing of causes  of mortality of individuals and also provide a basis for  esti-
mating the mortality rates of eggs and fishes of various sizes which  are  en-
trained or impinged.  Laboratory studies have shown that mortality rates  can
be highly variable, ranging from less than 20 percent to nearly  100 percent.
The percents mortality of entrained and impinged individuals of  various size
classes become important when coupled with entrainment and impingement  rates
ranging into millions of individuals per year.  Mortality rates  due to  en-
trainment and  impingement must be studied on a plant by plant basis unless
100 percent mortality of all individuals is assumed.  Mortality  rates of  en-
trained individuals can be estimated by a number of formulae, perhaps the
most common being the difference between the percent alive at entry into  and
discharge from the cooling cycle:

    Percent mortality = pD - pE                                         (1)

    Where:     PQ = percent alive at discharge
               PE = percent alive at entry

    For small  sample sizes at either discharge or entry the standard  error
of the estimate of the difference of two fractions is large.  Other problems
arise in estimating pp and pp.  Individuals are killed during capture and
identification and Equation (1) assumes that this effect is cancelled out by
virtue of the  difference.  Bias in the estimates of pn or p^ or  both  can  oc-
cur due to stratification of larvae either horizontally or vertically in  the
water column,  by the use of sampling gear which tends to clog or operate
only intermittently or by sampling infrequently during a day or  week.   Each
of these possible causes of bias in the estimates of p^ and pp create prac-
tical problems if they are to be eliminated.  Laboratory experimental re-
sults are not  a sufficient substitute for field sampling to establish en-
trainment mortality rates at an individual power plant intake.

Size Distribution of Entrained Larvae

    Equation (1) classifies larvae of all lengths into a single  category.
That is, all individuals from approximately 5-35 mm are lumped into a single
class called "larvae" for purposes of computing pD and p£.  While this  pro-
cedure may be  acceptable due to the difficulty of obtaining samples of  suf-
ficient size,  it is important to measure lengths of individual larvae in  or-
der to estimate the size distribution of entrained larvae.  It is easily  de-
monstrated mathematically (Patterson 1979) that if larger (older) larvae
have a higher  survival rate to the juvenile stage of development, their
losses have stronger implications for the population as a whole  than  does
the loss of newly hatched larvae.  A second important reason for obtaining a
size distribution of entrained larvae is to compare it to the size distribu-
tion of larvae in source waters, so that it can be determined whether selec-
tive cropping  of larvae by the water intake is taking place.  If it is  con-
cluded that selective cropping of larvae by size class is occurring then  the
sample of larvae used to estimate total numbers entrained will produce  a
biased estimate of the fraction of total larval production (or total  stand-
ing crop) that is entrained.


                                    241

-------
Total Numbers of Entrained Larvae

    The numbers, E(t-j,t2), of larvae entrained  in  a  water  intake is  equal to
    E(tpt2) = £ Cp(t)-Qp(t)dt
                                                                    (2)

    Where:     Cp(t) = concentration of  larvae  in water  entering
                       the intake at time t.

    and        Qn(t) = water flow through the intake  at  time  t.

Records of Qp(t) are usually maintained  and so  this factor may be  determined
relatively precisely.  Determination of  Cp(t) is another matter and  for
power plants with large intakes one may  expect  considerable error  in esti-
mating the mean concentration of larvae  in the  water  column over even  a
short interval of time.
directly are:
                     Sources of error in the estimation of Cp(t)
    1.  Stratification of larvae both vertically and horizontally  in the
        intake canal the configuration of which may vary over time.

    2.  Random variation in larval densities within the water column.

    3.  Passage of  large clumps of extremely dense larvae through  the
        intake without being detected.

    4.  Clogged or  inoperable sampling gear.

Direct estimation occurs by measuring larval densities at the point at which
water enters or leaves the plant.  Since water intakes can  be very large in-
deed  (10 m x 10 m cross sectional area) the impossibility of sampling more
than  a fraction of  one percent of the water becomes obvious.

    Indirect estimation of Cp(t) occurs by measuring Cv(t),  larval  densities
in source waters (rivers, lakes, or estuaries) and assuming that
cp(t) =

Where:
•cv(t)

  f  =  ratio  of
      water  to
      water.
                                                                        (3)
                            mean concentration of  larvae  in  intake
                            mean concentration of  larvae  in  source
The parameter f is important when concentrations  in the water  intake  must be
estimated using indirect methods and upon occasion has become  the  object of
much debate (Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report  1977).  When source waters
are divided as, for example, in the case of the Monroe, Michigan power plant
Cv(t) is a weighted sum of mean concentrations in  each source.  Various
methods have been used to estimate Cv(t).  Hubbell and Herdendorf  (1977)
used four methods for estimating Cv(t) which differed  in  the way in which
larval concentrations in depth zones of the source waters were averaged and

                                     242

-------
the lengths of time that larvae were assumed to be present.   In  each  case
they assumed a value of 1  for the ratio f so that Cp(t)  = Cv(t).   Patterson
(1979) estimated total numbers of yellow perch larvae entrained  at  the
Monroe power plant in 1975 using three sets of data:  (a) larval concentra-
tions in the Raisin River  channel downstream from the water  intake,  (b)
larval concentrations at the point of discharge of cooling water from the
plant, and (c) larval concentrations in lake waters near the  mouth  of the
Raisin River.  Applying Equations (2) and (3) using concentrations  obtained
from data sets (a), (b), and (c) Patterson obtained two  estimates  of  f:
0.60 and 1.36.  An average estimated value of 0.98 was thus obtained  for f.

Total Number and Size Distribution of Impinged Individuals

    Impingement occurs when individuals too large to filter through a
screening device are caught and held against the device  by the force  of the
incoming water.  Impingement is estimated directly by counting the  number of
individuals accumulated in collecting pans or other collection hardware over
a fixed time interval.  As in the case of entrained larvae it is important
to obtain the size distribution of impinged fishes for two reasons:   (a) so
that a determination of whether the impinged individuals are  representative
of the population as a whole, and (b) so that survival rates  of fishes that
are impinged and later returned to the source wafers can be estimated by
size class.  The latter reason is particularly important because much effort
is being devoted by power  plant management to returning  impinged fishes to
source waters in a viable  condition.  Therefore if mortality  occurs,  for
example, to selected size  classes only, the end result amounts to selective
mortality among adults induced by the power plant.

    Since a complete census of impinged fishes is not taken problems  of
estimating total numbers impinged based upon sampling techniques arise.
Statistical sampling designs for estimating total impingement have  been dis-
cussed by Murarka and Kumar (Jensen 1977, Pages 267-289).

Percentage of Annual Larval Production Lost Through Entrainment

    The percentage of larval production lost through entrainment mortality
can be most directly and quickly estimated as:


    Percent lost in week i = 100 ( ,-                                   (4)
                                 \v

    Where:     Ej = estimated number of larvae entrained in week i.
               A.,- = estimated abundance of larvae in source waters  in
                    week i.

If length data are not recorded on entrained and standing crops of  larvae
then both E^  and A.,- are recorded in terms of total numbers only.  A bias in
the estimate of the percentage will  then occur if the length  distributions
contained in E,- and A,- are significantly different.  In  addition,  Equation
(4) will  overestimate percent of production lost due to  entrainment because

                                    243

-------
abundance  is  less  than  production.   This  bias can be reduced or eliminated
by replacing  Equation  (4)  by  Equation  (5):

                                           I E.
    Percent lost in week  i  =  100
                                   stl-mated  annua  proucion


    Where:      E-j = estimated  number  killed  due  to entrainment in
                    week  i.  And  estimated  annual  production is ob-
                    tained by  some method such as  Patterson's or
                    Pol gar's.

Used  as  an  indicator of water  intake  effect  the  percentage of annual  larval
production  lost  due to entrainment has the  advantage  of not requiring as-
sumptions of  any kind about the parent population  and can be calculated from
direct measurements obtained in the field.   It has the disadvantages  of sus-
ceptibility to  bias and lack of interpretability in terms of implications to
the adult population in source waters.

Percent  Reduction in Number of Young-of-Year  Recruits Due to Larval Entrain-
ment  Mortality

    The  percentage by which the number of young-of-year recruits is reduced
due to entrainment of larval fishes is estimated as:


                                                               Rl
    Percent reduction in  number of y-o-y recruits  = 100 1  - A • • ' -ri     (6)
    Where:     R] = number of young-of-year recruits  in  source waters
                    in the presence of water  intake operations.

    And        R2 = number of larvae killed due  to entrainment that
                    would have otherwise survived to  reach  young-of-
                    year age.

The estimate of R ] is:
    /\
    R] = (estimated number of larval produced  but not  entrained)  x
         (e-D-P)

    Where:     D = number of days in larval stage

    And        p = mean daily instantaneous natural mortality rate of
                   larvae.

    An alternate estimate of R-j can be obtained  by estimating young-of-year
standing crops directly and correcting for natural mortality of young-of-
year to produce an estimate of number of y-o-y recruits.
    The estimate of $2
                                     244

-------
    R2  =  (estimated  number of larval killed due to entrainment) x
         Q
         /  ' (x) *6      "dx                                              (8J
         o

    Where:      x = age of larvae at entrainment
            f(x) = relative frequency of larvae at age x when
                   entrained.

    If  length data are not obtained_ on entrained  larvae  (from which  ages  can
be estimated) than an average age d of larvae at  entrainment must be used
and Equation (8) becomes:
    /\
    R2  =  (estimated  number of larvae killed due to entrainment) x
         ^(D-d)-p                                                       (9)

In contrast to  Equation (5) the use of Equation (6) as an  indicator  of  water
intake  effect on the population projects larval mortality  into a later  stage
of physical development.  If survival rates in stages subsequent to  the  lar-
val stage are known  then it is theoretically possible to estimate percent-
ages by which later  life stages are reduced as a  result  of  larval entrain-
ment.  However,  the  requirement of additional parameter  estimates (survival
fractions for life stages) renders all such estimates more  and more  unreli-
able.  Equation  (6)  only accounts for a projected equivalent loss of young-
of-year fishes  due to entrainment.  It does not consider number of young-of-
year fishes entrained or impinged directly and consequently does not
evaluate  total  loss  to the young-of-year class.   By projecting the number of
larvae  lost due  to entrainment through several subsequent  stages of  physical
development and  applying survival factors at each stage  to  obtain estimates
of equivalent projected losses at later stages (in later years) it is ob-
vious that  these estimates are no longer direct effects.   Whether they  can
be considered estimates of population impacts depends upon whether they  are
projected to occur on a regular annual basis so that a long run change  in
the population  and fishery can be projected.

Percent Reduction in Size or Age Classes Due to Entrainment and Impingement
Losses

    The number  of individuals in each and every size or  age class from
young-of-year through adult stages killed as a result of entrainment and  im-
pingement can be estimated if the required data are obtained.  Length dis-
tributions  must  be estimated together with total  numbers impinged/entrained.
If some methods  is used to return impinged fishes to the source waters  in a
viable  condition then impingement mortality must  be adjusted.  If estimates
of standing stocks of the population are available by comparable length or
age classes then estimates can be computed of percent reduction in standing
stock by  size class  due to impingement mortality.

Vulnerability of Larval Population to Entrainment

    The vulnerability of a larva to entrainment is the chance that it will
be entrained during  its life time (in the larval  state).   Larval vulner-

                                     245

-------
ability depends upon the geomorphometry  of  the  basin of the source waters,
advective  and dispersive flow  characteristics of the source waters, length
of  life of the larvae, and flow  of water into the intake.   Hydrodynamic
models of river,  lake, and estuary circulation  have been used to estimate
larval vulnerability to entrainment  (Paul and Patterson 1977; Lawler e_t a]_.
1975) and  seem to be particularly relevant  in situations in which water cir-
culation patterns (a) cause  larvae to  repeatedly pass  near a water intake or
(b) transport high concentrations of  larvae  long distances to the mouth of a
water intake.  Vulnerability is  a difficult  parameter  to quantify because
there are many environmental factors which  should be taken into account
quantitatively but which exhibit large variability (wind,  water circulation,
density of spawners, larval  swimming patterns)  and are difficult to measure.
If  a larval subpopulation occupies a certain location  in source waters and
is  never vulnerable to entrainment it may be argued that the subpopulation
sustains no direct impact but  it does  not necessarily  follow that there is
no  long run impact to that subpopulation.   Since it is probable the vulner-
ability to entrainment varies  across the source  water  basin it is of impor-
tance to determine the degree  of variation  in vulnerability throughout a
basin.  In an extreme case it  might be discovered that in  only 25 percent of
the basin  is there a positive  probability of larval  entrainment while  larvae
which enter the remaining 75 percent of  the  basin become immune to entrain-
ment.  If such a  condition prevailed it  would be important not only for pur-
poses of siting of future water  intakes, but for purposes  of managing  flows
into existing water intakes to know the  location of the zone of high vulner-
ability.   It may  be possible to  adjust intake flow regimes so as to reduce
entrainment levels if a constant source  of  entrained larvae is identified.
If  larvae  are differentially vulnerable  to  entrainment depending upon  their
location in the source water basin then  the direct effect  measured in  terms
of  percent of the population entrained will vary across the basin.

    The ratio of  total numbers entrained to total  numbers  produced in  the
entire basin is simply an average percentage which may exhibit considerable
variation  if the  ratio were calculated on a sub-basin  basis.
ESTIMATING POPULATION PARAMETERS IN SOURCE WATERS

Total Annual Larval Production

    Total production of larvae must be carefully defined  with  reference  to
the source waters as there can be numerous points of  larval  entry includ-
ing spawning and hatching of eggs directly in source  waters, transport  of
eggs and larvae into source waters by stream flow,  and migration  of  larvae
from adjacent connecting lakes, embayments, and back  waters.   An  obvious
definition of production is the number of eggs which  hatch  in  the source
waters.  This definition eliminates confusion of production  with  migration
at the theoretical level but does not eliminate the problem  of separating
production from immigration in the estimation process when  the number  of
newly hatched eggs cannot be estimated directly (the  usual  case). A method
used by Patterson (1979) to estimate production of  larval yellow  perch  in
western Lake Erie is based upon a differential equation of mass balance  for
larval abundance in the source waters:

                                     246

-------
    N(t)  = h(t)-v(t)-r(t)-m(t)-L(t)-E(t)                                (10)

    Where:     h(t) = daily input rate of larvae to source waters
               v(t) = daily emigration rate of larvae from source waters
               r(t) = daily rate of larvae recruitment into first
                      juvenile stage of development in reference volume
               m(t) = daily rate of mortality of larvae in reference volume
               L(t) = daily rate of withdrawl of larvae in reference
                      volume by water intakes other than power plants
               E(t) = daily rate of withdrawl of larvae in reference
                      volume by power plants
               N(t) = net daily rate of change of larval abundance  in re-
                      ference volume.

    By making assumptions about the forms of the various functions  defined
above and by experimentally estimating each function wherever possible the
solved form of Equation (10) is fit to field based estimated of N(t) (lar-
val abundance on day t) by least squares.  The by-products of this  exercise
are estimates of total larval production and total natural mortality of lar-
vae in source waters.  Patterson assumed that net daily migration was zero
and defined all larvae entering the reference volume to be part of  produc-
tion.

    A second method which has been used to estimate larval production in
source waters consists of (a) estimating total larval abundance on  a
periodic  basis (weekly in the case of Lake Erie) throughout the entire
period of larval abundance, and (b) summing the periodic estimates  of abun-
dance.  The total  sum is the estimate of production.  This method has the
advantage of requiring only estimates of abundance but requires the assump-
tions that (a) new crops of larvae are sampled each period, (b) all crops of
larvae are sampled, and (c) natural mortality does not significantly depress
each new  crop prior to its being sampled.

    A third method for estimating total larval production in source waters
was developed by Polgar (1977) and applied to the estimation of striped bass
larval production  in the Potomac River.  It is a refinement of the  second
method mentioned above and incorporates a mortality function so that the
larval mortality rate is estimated together with production.  In this res-
pect it is comparable to Patterson's method.

    All three methods have been applied in situations in which larval den-
sities in source waters have been sampled at weekly intervals.

Natural Mortality  Rate of Larvae

    The natural mortality rate of larvae in source waters is difficult to
estimate  and may be the least precisely known of all population parameters.
It is quite obviously an important factor in the determination of year class
strength  and hence of successful propagation of the population and  fishery.
The methods of Patterson and Polgar (preceding section) for estimating total
larval production  both incorporate mortality parameters and, upon assuming
that mortality is  proportional to abundance, yield (simultaneously  with

                                    247

-------
estimates of production) estimates of the instantaneous  natural  mortality
rate.  Both estimates depend numerically upon periodic measurements  of  lar-
val abundances in the source waters but differ in another  respect.
Patterson's method assumes a single instantaneous natural  mortality  rate
which is constant throughout the entire length of the larval  stage.  The
method of least squares is applied to fit the solution of  Equation (10) to a
time series of larval abundance data (over the entire period  of  larval  abun-
dance) over a two dimensional grid of mortality rate-production  rate para-
meter combinations.  Simultaneous pairs of production and  mortality  para-
meters are thus identified which minimize the mean square  deviation of  pre-
dicted abundance (from the solution to Equation 10) from estimated abun-
dance based upon field measurements of larval densities.   Polgar's method
breaks the larval stage down into three sub-stages plus  an additional stage
representing eggs.  Three recursive difference equations of the  following
form are solved:
    Vi6       .  fl.l±l!i±l                                            („,
       -p.t.          -p.t.                                            u '
    1-e  1 n       1-e  1 n                            (i=0,l,2,3)


    Where:     Ai = total estimated abundance of stage i  larvae  in
                    source waters summed over all periods of observation.
               Pi - mean instantaneous natural mortality  rate of stage i
                    larvae.
               ti = length of stage i development time interval.

    One of the parameters pi must be estimated independently in  order to se-
quentially solve Equations (11).

    A third method for estimting the natural mortality rate of  larvae was
presented by Hackney and Webb (1977).  Total abundance of larvae for each 5
millimeter length class is estimated weekly based upon field sampling.
Total abundance, Ni, for the entire season of each length class  i is then
estimated and a relationship between length class and age (days) of  larvae
is then established.  Finally, total abundance of each successive length
class i is plotted on semi-log paper against age for the  respective  length
class, and the slope is the estimate of the mean instantaneous  natural
mortality rate pn-.  The Hackney and Webb method is similar to Patterson's
method to the extent that it uses a special case of Equation (10) which  is
then fit to abundance data.  Instead of fitting a production function h(t)
of known form to abundance data (Patterson's method), Hackney and Webb
estimated a proportion of weekly production by measuring  larval  abundance
(weekly) by 5 mm length class.


REVIEW OF FACTORS NEEDED FOR ASSESSING LONG RUN EFFECTS

    Assessment of effects upon a fish population caused by water intake
losses of previous years is difficult because of (a) large natural vari-

                                     248

-------
ability  of  the  population standing crop or fishery yield from  one  year  to
the next,  (b) confounding of effects of water intake caused  losses with
other  causes  of population reduction, and (c) variability of the direct ef-
fects  of the  water  intakes from one year to the next.  Consequently,  it is
very difficult  to estimate the impact of a water intake by estimating dif-
ferences in the population standing crop directly in the field from one
year to  the next.   Special situations can be visualized such as a  power
plant  cropping  fishes  of all ages from a reservoir with other  environmental
factors  remaining fixed.  If the fish population exhibits a downward trend
over a period of years it may be not plausible to assume that  the  losses
are due  to  the  cumulative direct effects of the power plant.   As plausible
as this  assumption  might appear it remains to be tested because fish popula-
tions  have  been known  to go into states of decline for no apparent reason.
The accumulation of direct effects of annual entrainment and impingement
losses are  very frequently analyzed by numerical models which  fall into one
of two groups.   A fish population is typically assumed to exist in a condi-
tion of  statistical equilibrium implying that the full set of  environmental
conditions  surrounding the population are constant.  Under these conditions
age distribution and fishery yields are constant.  Let the population stand-
ing crop and  fishery yields be denoted by N] and YI respectively.  A water
intake caused loss  is  then introduced on a fixed annual basis.  Let the new
equilibrium levels  of  population standing crop and fishery yields  be denoted
by N2 and  Y£  respectively.  Then two long run impacts of the water intake
are measured  in terms  of N-|-N2 and Y]-Y2.  One type of numerical model
attempts to mimic the  fish population before and after the introduction of
the water  intake and therefore estimates N] (or Y]) and N2 (or Y2) separate-
ly, after  which the difference N-]-N2 (or Y-j-Yp) is calculated  as a measure
of long  term  impact.  Leslie-Matrix models and their modification  (DeAngelis
1978)  are  examples  of  this type.  A second type of model focuses upon the
annual losses into  an  equilibrium estimate of the amount by which  the popu-
lation is  reduced  (N]-N2) or the amount by which the fishery yields are re-
duced  (Y-j-Y?).   This type of model is called an "equivalent adult" model be-
cause it only is concerned with converting annual water intake caused losses
into equivalent losses to standing crop or fisheries.  In these models
standing crops  are  never estimated because it is only the differences N-]-N2
or Y]-Y2 that are of concern (Patterson 1978; Goodyear 1978).  Each approach
has advantages  and  disadvantages involving assumptions and parameter re-
quirements, verifiability, and ease of development and application.   It is
the opinion of  some that numerical models of impacts represent a "last  re-
sort"  when  analyzing effects of water intakes upon fish populations.  In re-
cent years, however, it appears that this method of last resort is invari-
ably used  as  one means of evaluating power plant impacts upon  fish popula-
tions.  It  is difficult to determine whether cropping caused by water in-
takes  is sufficiently  severe to project a population into an inferior com-
petitive position within an aquatic community.  If such were the case then
it is  an example of an ecological impact triggered by what would initially
appear to  be  a  completely unrelated cause of fish mortality.   Long run
ecological  impacts  of  water intake cropping which go beyond a  single popu-
lation may  exist and may even be significant in some cases but are even more
difficult  to  assess.
                                     249

-------
REFERENCES

DeAngelis, D.L. et &]_.  1978.  A generalized fish  life-cycle  population
    model and computer program.  Environmental Sciences  Division  Publica-
    tion No. 1128, Oak Ridge National Laboratory,  Oak Ridge,  Tenn.

Goodyear, C.P.  1978.  Entrainment impact estimates using the equivalent
    adult approach.  Power Plant Project, Biological Services Program, Fish
    and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior.

Hackney, P.A. and J.C. Webb.  1977.  A method for  determining growth and
    mortality rates of ichthyoplankton.  Fourth National Workshop on En-
    trainment and Impingement.  EA Communications, A Division of  Ecological
    Analysts, Inc., Melville, N.Y.  pp. 115-124.

Hubbell, R.M. and C.E. Herdendorf.  1977.  Entrainment estimates  for yellow
    perch in western Lake Erie 1975-1976.  CLEAR Technical Report No. 71,
    The Ohio State University Center for Lake Erie Area  Research, Columbus,
    Ohio.

Jensen, L.D.  1977.  Fourth National Workshop on Entrainment  and  Impinge-
    ment.  EA Communications, A Division of Ecological Analysts,  Inc.
    Melville, N.Y.

Jobes, F.W.  1952.  Age, growth, and production of yellow perch in Lake
    Erie.  U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service.
    Fishery Bulletin 70.

Lawler, Matusky and Skelly, Engineers.  1975.  Report on development of a
    real time, two dimensional model of the Hudson River striped  bass popu-
    lation (1975).  LMS Project No. 115-49, Tappan, New  York.

Muth, K.M.  1977.  Status of major species in Lake Erie, 1976 commercial
    catch statistics, current studies and future plans.  U.S. Fish and
    Wildlife Service, Sandusky, Ohio.

Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Wildlife.  1977.  Status of
    Ohio's Lake Erie fisheries.

Ohio Ridge National Laboratory.  1977.  A selective analysis of power plant
    operation on the Hudson River with emphasis on the Bowline Point
    Generating Station.  Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report No. TM-5877,
    Volume 2.  pp. 5-78.

Patterson, R.L.  1979.  Production, mortality, and power plant entrainment
    of larval yellow perch in western Lake Erie.   U.S. Environmental Pro-
    tection Agency Research and Development Report.  EPA-600/3-79-087.
                                    250

-------
Paul,  J.F.  and  R.L.  Patterson.   1977.   Hydrodynamic simulation of movement
    of larval fishes in  western Lake Erie and their vulnerability to power
    plant  entrainment.   Proceedings of the 1977 Winter Simulation Con-
    ference.  Vol.  I.  National Bureau of Standards.   Gaitherburg, MD.
    pp.  305-316.

Polgar,  T.T.  1977.   Population dynamics of ichthyoplankton.  Proceedings of
    the  Conference  on  Assessing the Effects of Power  Plant Induced Mortality
    on Fish Populations, Pergamon Press,  pp. 115-120.

Saila, S.B.  1975.   Fisheries and energy production,  A Symposium.  Lexington
    Books,  D.C. Heath  and Company, Lexington, Mass.

Smith, Stanford H.   1972.  The  future  of salmonid communities in the
    Laurentian  Great Lakes.  J. Fish Res. Bd. Canada  29: 951-957.

Wells, LaRue  and A.L.  McLain.  1973.  Lake Michigan,  man's effects on native
    fish stocks and  other biota.  Great Lakes Fishery Commission Technical
    Report No.  20.
                                    251

-------
                                 SECTION 14

          CONTROL OF THE WATER RESOURCES OF THE AZOV  SEA  USING  THE
                "AZOV PROBLEM" FAMILY OF SIMULATION SYSTEMS

             A.B. Gorstko1, F.A. Surkov"1, L.V. Epshteyn1
                            and A.A. Matveyev2


    A well-developed industrial and agrarian complex  has  grown  up  in  the
Azov Sea drainage basin.  In a territory of 618,000 km2,  with a population
of 33 million persons (13 percent of the entire population of the USSR),
some 15 percent of the industrial and 21 percent of the gross agricultural
products of the country are produced.  Virtually the  entire  area of the re-
gion is utilized agriculturally, with crops covering  86 percent of the area
of the drainage basin.  Industrial utilization of the deposits  of minerals
in the area has reached a high level.  Most of the deposits  which have been
discovered are being utilized to some extent.  The entire water area  of the
Azov Sea (38,000 km2) is utilized for fishing, and the use of the sea
coast for recreation is growing.  Thus, the most important natural resources
of the region have been involved in the process of economic  activity.  This
is referred to as the emerging regional natural-technical system (NTS) of
the Azov Sea basin (Borovich ejt al_. 1977).

    The water resources represent an important structural element of  the
natural-technical system of the Azov Sea basin.  Significant volumes  of
fresh water, which must be of high quality, are necessary for normal  func-
tioning and further development of industry, agriculture, power engineering,
fishing, water transport, and for supporting normal living conditions of the
population.  However, the region is poor in fresh water resources.  Whereas
each resident in the European portion of the USSR has at  his disposal some
6000 m3 of fresh water per year, in this area, only 1700  m3/yr  per resi-
dent is available.  Of all natural resources,  it is water which presently
limits the development of agricultural production in  this area.

    The possibility of deterioration in water  quality, due to  its  shortages
and the intensive agricultural utilization, plays a significant role  in
 Institute of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics,  Rostov  State  University,
 192/2 Stachky Prospect, 344090 Rostov-on-Don, USSR.

2Hydrochemical Institute, 192/3 Stachky Prospect,  344090 Rostov-on-Don,
 USSR.

                                    252

-------
limiting  the  rate  of growth of agricultural production.  An increase of
capital investment in agriculture and an increase in the sophistication of
land  use  can  provide an  increase in the productivity of agriculture, but
not rapidly enough and,  more importantly, these measures cannot, in and of
themselves, guarantee stability of agricultural production.  The impossi-
bility of broadening the agriculture base leaves the problem of intensifica-
tion  of agricultural production in a region with no alternative solutions.

   The decisive factor  in the intensification and stabilization of agricul-
tural production  in the  region should be irrigated agriculture.  The yield
from  irrigated  land is not only significantly higher, but is is also less
subject to fluctuations  at the mercy of natural weather conditions than is
the yield from  nonirrigated land.  Improvement in the sophistication'of land
use could also  be  greatly aided by irrigated agriculture.

   However,  construction of irrigation systems in the region would lead to
a number  of significant  structural changes in the nature of transformation
and consumption of the water reserves in the area.  First of all, we must
note  the  negative  influence of the use of water for irrigation on the qual-
ity of water  in rivers and streams, due to increased introduction of pollu-
tants  (particularly if mineral fertilizer is intensively used), and due to
changes in the  salt and  nutrient composition of the runoff.  Furthermore, an
increase  occurs in the consumptive use of water for agriculture, as a result
of increased  transpiration of water by plants in irrigated fields and the
evaporation of  water from the surfaces of reservoirs and from irrigation
systems.   Finally, regulation of runoff, in order to hold back flood waters
for the needs of  agriculture, results in seasonal leveling of the discharge
of rivers and streams, which influence the hydrologic and water/salt regimes
in the Azov Sea.

   By 1976,  the  total amount of irrigated land had reached 13,300 km^ in
this  area (double  the area of 1971).  In order for irrigated agriculture to
become a  truly  decisive  factor in the intensification and stabilization of
agricultural  production  in the region, this surface area must clearly be in-
creased.   Plans for the  development of irrigation call for continuation of
the high  rates  of  growth of irrigated land areas through the end of the cen-
tury.  By 1975, the total quantity of water diverted for irrigation was 9.22
km3,  the  consumption use was 8.69 km3 (Bronfman 1976).

   The total consumption of water for industry, power engineering and by
the population  of  cities and towns was 10.6 knv3 in 1975, including nonre-
covered consumption on the order of 1 km3.  The volume of water diverted
and consumed  by these structural elements of the NTS is expected to grow
slowly in the future, as planned steps are taken to develop recycling
systems and introduce new technological systems which use less water.

   The nature  of  the use of the water resources in the continental portion
of the Azov Sea basin will also determine the functioning of such structural
elements  of the NTS as the ecosystem of the Azov Sea.  This system is the
most  productive marine body of water, in terms of fishing, in the world.  In
the mid-1930's, the total catch in this sea reached 300,000 tons (8-9-103


                                      253

-------
tons/km2), while the potential of the sea  is  estimated  as  850,000 tons
(over 20-103 tons/km2).

    Since the Azov Sea is the final link in the  chain of transformation of
water resources in the region, it follows  from general  ecologic principles
that the effects of anthropogenic action throughout  the basin will  be accu-
mulated in the sea (Dyuvino and Tang 1973).   Analysis of the  results of ob-
servations of the status of the ecosystem  confirms this belief (Vorovich et
al. 1977).  The present level of consumptive  use of  water  and of discharge
oT pollutants, the seasonal leveling of the discharge of rivers and streams,
the change in the biogenic and mineral runoff and other anthropogenic fac-
tors will cause a decrease in the biologic productivity of the sea.

    Thus, the shortage of high-quality water will limit the rates of devel-
opment (and in some cases, will set absolute  limits  of  development) of the
NTS of the region as a whole.  To study this  problem further, the region was
divided into territories, the boundaries of which do not agree with any ad-
ministrative-territorial boundaries.  The  selection  of  a region on  the basis
of geography (more precisely, hydrogeology) meets the needs of this regional
study:  analysis of water resources as a functional  element in the  natural-
technical system, and the development of the  scientific principles  for the
control of the water resources of the region.

    The range of problems related to the use  of water resources in  the Azov
Sea basin, conservation or conscientious reconstruction of the ecosystem of
the Azov Sea, and the development of macroregional programs of supplementing
the continental runoff in the basin will be referred to as the Azov problem.
The Azov problem includes the problem of the Azov Sea in its  entirety
(Vorovich et _al_. 1977).

    Solution of the Azov problem requires  systematic development of a multi-
tude of versions of regional ecologic policies and water management strate-
gies in the Azov Sea basin, and evaluation of the probable effects  of these
versions in combination with macroregional projects.  Tremendous human and
material resources, planning, project and  scientific organizations  have
been drawn into this process.  The  importance of the problem, unprecedented
in terms of the scale of macroregional water management steps to be taken
(Voropayev 1976; Dunin-Barkovskiy 1976), the  complexity and nonintuitive na-
ture of the behavior of the NTS (Forrester 1974), requires organization of
the development and evaluation of plan versions designed to facilitate and
accelerate both the generation and  the evaluation of alternative plans.   It
seems that the basic principle of organization of all scientific plans and
plan development on the Azov problem should be the idea of the man-machine
system.  This should include structural subsystems,  decision  making per-
sonnel (DMP) at various levels; experts on the Azov  problem as a whole, and
experts on its individual aspects;  plan developers;  families  of "Azov prob-
lem" simulation systems (SS); an information  bank; and  persons who  plan and
conduct experiments with the SS.

    The simulation system is a modular structure of  significant complexity,
allowing a broad range of experiments to be performed.  The elements of the


                                     254

-------
structure,  the modules, are essentially complete models of  individual  pro-
cesses.

    It is  this representation of the SS as an element  in a  man-machine
system which served as the basis for development of the "Azov problem"
family of  simulation systems.  Work on the creation of the  entire family  is
far from complete.  However, the development and operation  of SS should not
be regarded as consisting of sequential stages.  They  are actually phases
in a continuous process.

    The "Azov problem" family of SS must include purely descriptive systems,
systems with partial optimization, and the more standard, unified and  de-
tailed systems.  At the present time, three simulation systems have been
developed:   1) the "rough prediction" system (ISGP), 2) the "Azov Sea"
system (ISAM), which is descriptive in nature, and 3)  a detailed simulation
system, "the land of the Azov basin" (DISSAB), a descriptive system with
elements of optimization.  The methodologic basis of the development of the
model has  been the method of simulation modeling (Gorstko 1977).

    In addition to these systems, the "Azov problem" family should include
the following SS, currently under development:  1) a "regional optimizer", a
standard economic model, developing the structure of branches of the econ-
omy, to be  optimal from the standpoint of criteria related  to water re-
sources; 2) "Aksakal", a simulation system which "allocates water" among
branches and territorial systems in case of shortages, zonal economic  models
based on optimization of the utilization of water in agricultural produc-
tion; 3) a "local optimizer", a standard economic model answering the  same
questions  as the "regional optimizer", but developed for a  significantly
smaller territorial breakdown of the region; 4) "water purity", a standards
SS, defining the necessary level of purification of water and the loss re-
sulting from failure to meet purification standards.  The general properties
are shared  by the SS of the family to various degrees.

    In all  SS, the object being modeled is considered  to be divided into  in-
dividual segments (regions).  The status of each segment is described  by  a
set of ingredients, combined in the description of the segment (status vec-
tor).  The  territory (or water area) of the segment is considered homoge-
neous in all ingredients.  The union of the status vectors  of all segments
is called  the status vector of the system as a whole.

    The ingredients of the status vectors change discretely, the selection
of the time step representing a complex, informal process which is con-
ducted in  combination with decomposition of the system into processes
modeled by individual modules and separation of the objects into segments.
The art and erudition of the creators of the SS, not only mathematicians,
but also scientists studying the system from the standpoint of natural sci-
ence and social-economic disciplines (hydrology, biochemistry, demography,
etc.) must  be employed here.

    In the  ISAM and DISSAB, the model is limited to a  single time step (of 5
and 10 days, respectively).  In the ISGP, two time steps are studied,  a
small step  (1 month) to model rapid processes, and a larger step (1 year  or

                                    255

-------
5 years, depending on the purposes of the specific  simulation  experiment).
The latter is used to simulate long-term economic programs  and versions  of
possible climate-determined changes which are  important  for the status of
the water resources of the region.

    The modular structure of the SS makes it possible  to describe  each pro-
cess modeled using the mathematical apparatus which  is most adequate  to  the
nature of the process.  Further, it allows independent identification of
each unit before it is included in the composition  on  the SS.

    In the "Azov Sea" simulation system, the status  of each of the 7  seg-
ments, into which the water area is divided (Figure  1),  is  described  by  a
              Figure 1.   Diagram of regions of the Azov Sea.

status vector including 120 ingredients.  The processes modeled  in  ISAM are
distributed among 15 models (modules):  WATER DYNAMICS, NUTRIENT ELEMENTS,
OXYGEN, WATER QUALITY, PHYTOPLANKTON, ZOOPLANKTON, BENTHOS,  GOBY, PIKE-
PERCH, BREAM, ROACH, STURGEONS, HERRING, ANCHOVY, OTHER FISH.  The  module
entitled WATER DYNAMICS includes the volume of water exchanged among  re-
gions of the sea during the five-day period in question.  The module  called
NUTRIENT ELEMENTS describes the cycle in the SS of the compounds of nitro-
gen, phosphorus and silicon considering the processes of transfer,  break-
down, consumption, erosion of the shore and other processes.  The module
termed OXYGEN models the enrichment of the water with oxygen during photo-
synthesis, and by atmospheric aeration; consumption of oxygen in biochemical
processes, and distribution of dissolved oxygen between surface  and bottom
layers.  The WATER QUALITY module, one of the most important  in  the system,
models the dynamics of the concentration of pollutants considering  their  in-
put and breakdown.  The rate of self-purification of the bodies  of  water  de-
pends on the temperature of the water, type of pollutant and condition of
the aquatic ecosystem.

    The modules describing the dynamics of living organisms  in the  ecosystem
consider the processes of grazing, respiration, breeding, migration and

                                    256

-------
death.   Controlling  influences such as removal of a fraction of the  popula-
tion  and stocking  of the sea with young fish are considered for the  fish
populations.

    From the  standpoint  of program organization, the "Azov problem"  simula-
tion  system  is  a hierarchical structure, the elements of which are standard
program and  information  modules for this information system.  The software
modules consist of banks of programs (BP) on information carriers, while  the
information modules  consist of banks of data (BD).  The SS is a variable
composition  system,  i.e., without changing the overall structure of  the
system, additional modules can be added to or removed from the BP and BD  in
the system.   The modeling, control and service programs in the BP are not
distinguished in the sense of rules of accessing them:  Each module  is as-
signed  an arbitrary  number, the first digit of which represents the  hierar-
chical  level  of which the module belongs, while the second indicates its
functional  purpose (modeling program, control program, service program, ser-
vice  BD, etc.). Subsequently, several digits are provided for the class
number, and  several  more for modifications.  Addition or removal of modules
in the  BP includes a stage of updating the BP directory, which can be
printed out  by  a special service program.  The BP catalogue contains basic
information  on  the module, the number, value, data of inclusion, a comment
section and  the number of the last simulation experiment in which the module
of the  BP and SS was used.  The "Azov problem" family has from 3-5 hierar-
chical  levels.  Modules  of higher levels hierarchy can be accessed only by
programs of  lower  hierarchical levels.

    The first hierarchical level of the entire SS contains the control pro-
grams,  which  call  the basic control modules, check the correctness of a call
and transfer  control to  it.  The modules of the first hierarchical level
operate once  each  time the system is initialized (STARTER class).

    Modules  of  the second hierarchical level (REGIME class) are the  main
control programs.   The functions of this group include actual organization
of operation  of the  SS in accordance with its program, assigned by one or
more information control files.  These files are defined by the experimental
planner.  Their specific structure is dictated by the structure of each SS
and differs  greatly, e.g., between ISAM and DISSAB.  We can say with suffi-
cient generality that the control files consist of macroinstructions which
are interpreted by REGIME.

    The third hierarchical level of modules consists of the MODELS of vari-
ous classes  (e.g., in the "SEA" SS - the class WATER DYNAMICS, NUTRIENTS,
etc.);  the subordinate control programs (for ISAM - the classes REPLACEMENT,
CHECK,  ADJUST); the  service programs (the classes PRINT RESULT, NORMAL OUT-
PUT,  EMERGENCY  OUTPUT);  programs for generation of external factors  (STO-
CHASTIC PREDICTION,  REGRESSION ANALYSIS, EXOGENOUS FACTORS); and the basic
programs for  the systems servicing the BP and BD.

    Modules  of  the fourth and fifth hierarchical levels include programs
which run algorithms common for several blocks (e.g., the modules FEED, MI-
GRATION, CATCH, and  ISAM), for all programs of the complexes which service
the BP  and BD,  and which are accessed by the base modules of the third  hier-

                                     257

-------
archical level.  The program structure of one  simulation  system - ISAM - is
shown schematically in Figure 2.

    The data bank also has a hierarchical structure.   All  information mod-
ules have a standard format in accordance with one of  the  PROTOTYPES.  The
PROTOTYPES developed for each SS are divided into two  classes  - INITIAL PRO-
TOTYPES and ANNUAL PROTOTYPES.  INITIAL PROTOTYPES are  designed for  storage
of information entering the SS from the external world, and  are developed
so that the information is easy and convenient to prepare.   This SS  is a
system of variable composition with respect to INITIAL  PROTOTYPES.   ANNUAL
PROTOTYPES describe the structure of the information modules used directly
in the operation of the SS program modules.  Their composition  is rigidly
defined, while the PROTOTYPES are developed either as  unchanging, or as
having an unchanging portion (e.g., prototypes of files with floating bound-
aries such as the prototype CHAMBER DESCRIPTION in the model LAND).

    The system of modules servicing the BD is  designed for  input and record-
ing of information modules with checking for the agreement of preparation of
the initial data with the PROTOTYPES, adjustment of files  using CORRECTING
PROTOTYPES (a subclass of the class of INITIAL PROTOTYPES),  sorting  of in-
formation, elimination of modules, generation  of new modules using FINISHED
PROTOTYPES, work with the BD CATALOGUE, and output of  information concerning
the composition of the BD and printout of modules on the request of  REGIME.

    It should be noted that the FINISHED IS PROTOTYPE must include proto-
types of all control modules, while the INITIAL PROTOTYPES must include pro-
totypes of the correcting files, which can be  used to  generate  a new control
file from those already present in the BD.  Thus, the  BD contains a  set of
finished programs from the simulation experiments, and an experiment can be
repeated by simply inputting a single item of  data, its number.   Further-
more, due to the ease of generation of new information control  files in the
BD, it is simple to perform new simulation experiments without  preparing
large files of initial data.

    The most important systems functions, among those  defining  the differ-
ence of the simulation system from a simple large model, are performed by
the modules which track the course of the simulation experiment and  adjust
the calculation trajectory of the system.  They can be considered as a sub-
system for automatic tuning of the SS in various functioning regimes during
the course of an experiment, depending on the  results  of calculations al-
ready performed.  For example, the modules of  the CONTROL  class in ISAM
give the experimental planner the ability to see that  the  values of  ingre-
dients or certain simple functions (with ingredients taken  as their  argu-
ments) do not go beyond established limits, or, if they do,  to  take  certain
actions.

    In order to solve the Azov problem to the  extent which  is objectively
required and possible, application of a combination of regional  and  macro-
regional, technical, economic and ecologic measures, using the  "Azov prob-
lem" family of simulation systems as a tool for this purpose must be made.
                                      258

-------
          FIRST HI ERA RCHICA L LE VEL:
                                                                STARTER
          SECOND HIERARCHICAL LEVEL:
                                                                 REGIME
r-o
          THIRD HIERARCHICAL LEVEL:
MODELS
Water d

Biogenic

ynamics

elements

c
SUBORDINATE
;ONTROL MODULES
Replacement

Checking

Adjustment


                                                            SERVICE MODULES
                                                                Print result
                                                              Scheduled output
                                                              Emergency output
G
EXTERNAL
ENERATION
Exogenous
FACTOR
MODULES
factors

Stochastic prediction


Regression analysis



   BASIC MODULES
SERVICING BRAND BD
                                                                                                                  Module 1
                                                                                                                  Module 2
	 :\^ 	 i 	 ^^
FOURTH HIERARCHICAL
LEVEL:
^-^ * ^^
ISAM standard subunit

i
I
r
Standard statistical subunits

Standard BP and BD
servicing subunits
                                       Figure 2.   Program  structure of the  "Azov Sea"  SS.

-------
REFERENCES

Bronfman, A.N.  1976.  Experience in study and solution of ecologic-geo-
    graphic problems of the Azov Sea basin.  Chelovek i sreda.  Materials
    of the 23rd International Geographic Congress, Moscow, Nauka Press.

Dunin-Barkovskiy,  L.V. and N.N. Moiseyev.  1976.  A system of models of the
    redistribution of the river runoff of the USSR.  Vodnyye resursy, No. 3.

Dyuvino, M. and T. Tang.   1973.  Biosfera i mesto v ney cheloveka  (The bio-
    sphere and man's place in it),  Moscow, Mir Press.

Forrester, J.   1974.  Dynamics of urban development.  Translation edited by
    Yu. Ivanilov,  Moscow, Progress  Press.

Gorstko, A.B.   1977.  Simulation modeling.  Izvestiye SKNTs VSh, Estestv.
    nauki, No. 2.

Voropayev, G.V.  1976.  Tasks and organization of scientific research in
    connection with the problem of  redistribution of water resources.
    Vodnyye resursy, No.  3.

Vorovich, 1.1., A.M. Bronfman, S.P.  Volovik,  and E.V. Makarov.   1977.  The
    Azov Sea  problem.  IZvestiya SKNTs VSh, Estestv. nauki, No.  2.
                                     260

-------
                                 SECTION 15

                 THE  TRANSPORT OF CONTAMINANTS IN LAKE ERIE

                              Wilbert Lick1
INTRODUCTION
    The  general  purpose  of our research is to understand more thoroughly
and  be able  to  predict the transport and fate of contaminants in lakes.
This transport  and  fate  is a complex matter which involves physical, chemi-
cal, and  biological  processes, all  of which need to be considered before the
fate of  contaminants can be predicted.  In the present paper, only the
physical  processes  of transport are discussed in detail.

    Much  of  our work has been concerned with contaminants in Lake Erie (see
Figure 1)  and that  work  will be emphasized here.  Lake Erie is a large shal-
low  lake  approximately 386 km long  and 80 km wide with an average depth of
20m.  Topographically,  it can be separated into three basins:  (1) a shal-
low  Western  Basin with an average depth of 7 m, (2) a large, relatively flat
Central  Basin with  an average depth of 18 m, and (3) a deeper, cone-shaped
Eastern  Basin with  an average depth of 24 m.  The Western and Central Basins
are  separated by a  rocky chain of islands.

    In the following section, a general discussion of the processes affect-
ing  the  transport of contaminants is given.  The results of analyses of two
specific  problems of contaminant transport are then presented.  These are
(1)  the  resuspension, transport, and deposition of sediments in the Western
Basin of  Lake Erie,  and  (2) the temperatures, currents, and the transport of
contaminants  in  the  Central Basin of Lake Erie during summer stratification.


FACTORS  AFFECTING THE TRANSPORT OF  CONTAMINANTS IN LARGE LAKES

    A brief  discussion of the factors affecting the transport of contami-
nants in  lakes  is given  here.  The  transport of sediments is discussed
first.   Sediments are significant contaminants in themselves, since they in-
crease the turbidity of  the water and, when heavy sedimentation occurs, may
require that  large  amounts of dredging be done.  However, most importantly
'Department  of Mechanical  and  Environmental Engineering, University of
 California  at Santa  Barbara,  Santa Barbara, California 93106.
                                    261

-------
       '" '»/>J/SW/JJS//'
         LAKE ERIE LONGITUDINAL
           CROSS SECTION
Figure  1.   Lake  Erie bottom topography.
                    262

-------
in the  present  context, sediments (especially the fine-grained,  clay-sized
fraction)  readily adsorb many other contaminants such  as  phosphates,  heavy
metals,  and toxic hydrocarbons.  Hence, if we understand  the  transport  of
sediments, we can then more readily understand the  transport  and fate of
other contaminants.

    After  this  brief review of sediment transport,  a few  comments  are made
on the  transport and fate of other contaminants, specifically radioactive
materials, nutrients, and chlorinated hydrocarbons.  The  discussion  is  meant
to apply to large lakes in general.  However, when  specific values of para-
meters  are needed for illustration, parameters appropriate to Lake Erie have
been chosen.

Sediment Transport

    The primary sources of sediments in lakes are river inflows  and  shore
erosion while the primary sinks are river outflows  and the deposition and
ultimate consolidation of sediments into the permanent sedimentary bottom
of the  lake.

    The process of the transport of sediments from  the primary sources  to
ultimate sinks  occurs by frequent cycles of resuspension, transport,  and de-
position.   This cycle occurs on the order of a few  days while the time  from
input to final  deposition and consolidation probably occurs on the scale of
months  to  years, perhaps tens of years.  Transport  may occur  as  suspended
load (for  the finer  sediments) or as bed load (for  the coarser sediments).
The emphasis  here is on the fine-grained sediments, and therefore suspended
load, since the fine-grained sediments are responsible (because  of their
large surface area and hence adsorptive capacities) for the greater  flux of
contaminants.

Mass Balance  Equation--
    Preliminary attempts have been made to develop  predictive numerical
models  of  the transport of fine-grained sediments in large lakes (Lick  e_t
£L 1976;  Sheng and  Lick 1979).  These models are predicated  on  the  solution
of the  following mass balance equation,

8C   j(uC)    8(vC)
1   9x       9y

where C is the  concentration of the sediment, t  is  time,  u, v, and w  are
fluid velocities in  the x, y, z directions respectively,  ws is the settling
speed of the  sediment, DH is the horizontal eddy diffusivity,  and Dy  is the
vertical eddy diffusivity.

    In  order  to obtain solutions to this equation and  hence to determine
sediment transport,  various quantities such as the  fluid  velocities,  the
settling velocities, the eddy diffusivities, and of course the entrainment
and deposition  rates at the sediment-water interface must be  known or cal-
culated.  The determination of these quantities  is  discussed  below.
                                     263

-------
Settling Velocities-
    It is known that settling velocities depend  on  the  mineralogy and grain
size of the sediments, on the ionization strength of  the  water,  and on the
sediment concentration (Owen 1978; Terwindt  1977; Fukuda  1978).   Little work
has been done to characterize the settling velocities of  fresh water se^-
ments and much more needs to be done.  The distribution of settling /ce-
cities for a sediment from the Western Basin of  Lake  Erie is  presented in
Figure 2.  Shown is the percent of suspended sediment within  various
settling velocity intervals.  It is quite evident that  the settling velo-
cities range over four orders of magnitude,  a range that  must be considered
in any quantitative description of sediment  transport.

Entrainment and Deposition—
    The net flux of sediment qs at the sediment-water interface  is  the dif-
ference between the entrainment rate E and the deposition rate D, or

                   qs = E - D                                           (2)

As a first approximation, it can be assumed that the deposition  is  propor-
tional to concentration, and hence

                   qs = E - BC                                          (3)

where 3 is the coefficient of proportionality, is known as  the reflectivity
parameter, and has the units of velocity.  It is convenient to rewrite the
above equation as

                   qs = 3(C   - C)                                      (4)

where Ceq = E/B and represents a steady-state, or dynamic equilibrium,  con-
centration.

    The above relations are strictly only valid for sediments of uniform
grain size.  They are only approximations for naturally occurring sediments
which have effective grain sizes varying over several orders  of  magnitude
(indicated by the variation in settling velocities shown  in Figure  2),  but
nevertheless are useful for organizing experimental data.   It is becoming
evident from our previous modeling attempts  and from our  experimental  work
that this range of effective grain sizes must be considered in any  quantita-
tive description of sediment transport.

    The processes that govern the behavior of the parameters  E,  B,  and Ceq
are not well understood (especially for fine-grained sediments in fresh
water).  It is known that these parameters depend on the  shear stress  ap-
plied at the sediment-water interface, on the bulk sediment water content,
on the mineralogy of the solid sediment, and probably on  the  activity of the
benthic organisms present in the sediment.   Experiments have  been made
(Fukuda 1978; Fukuda and Lick 1979; Lee 1979) and are being made to quantify
these phenomena.

    In experiments thus far, only the top few millimeters of  sediment have
been entrained.  Since properties of the sediment such  as water  content and

                                     264

-------
 6  30
 •a
 •o
 s
    20
     10
            median
               I   (deionized with
                 median
dispersant)
-4   -3   -2   -I
                                   (deionized)
           0  -4   -3   -2
                                                 -I
| 40 r r
I
"H 30
w
1 20
| 10
V)
55
( tap water)
median
1
"
M


MIMMH

__

—





mi







1 MIVVIIUI
( Is. 7 water)
_

"
-
.



r
— f|
mm
















        -4  -3   -2   -I    0  -4  -3   -2   -I

                          log(0(ws)

                          (cm/sec)
Figure 2.   Settling  velocity versus  percent of suspended sediment
               for the Western Basin sediment.
                           265

-------
grain size change rapidly with depth,  it  is  expected that entrainment rates
will also change rapidly with depth.   Experiments  are now being made to
understand and quantify this variation, a variation  that is essential to ac-
curately predict sediment transport.

    It is also becoming evident  (e.g., see Thomas  et a/[. 1972,  1976; Sly
1978; Sheng and Lick 1979) that  sediment  properties  vary greatly throughout
a lake and even throughout portions of a  lake  such as basins or bays.  For
example, entrainment rates vary  by at  least  two  orders of magnitude for
sediments throughout the Western Basin of Lake Erie  (Lee 1979).  If this
variation is not considered, accurate  predictions  of sediment transport can
not be made.

    A major influence on sediment properties that  has not been  quantita-
tively investigated as yet is the effect  of  benthic  organisms on entrainment
and deposition rates.  Benthic organisms  are plentiful  in lakes, especially
in the near-shore areas.  They influence  sediment  properties by (1) rework-
ing the sediments (Fisher et^ al_. 1979; Fisher  and  Lick 1979) i.e.,  by bur-
rowing, passing particulate matter through their guts,  and egesting fecal
pellets of different shape, size, and  content  than the original sedimentary
material, and (2) excreting mucus on the  surface and on  burrow  walls which
may assist in binding the sediments.   Preliminary  work has been done on this
problem but adequate information on the effect of  benthic organisms on en-
trainment and deposition rates is not  available.

Wave Generation and Bottom Stress —
    Our sediment flux experiments give the entrainment  and deposition rates
as a function of the applied shear stress.   In lakes,  this stress is due to
wave action and currents, with wave action dominating in shallow water.

    In order to predict this wave action,  a wave generation analysis is
needed.  In our computations (Kang e_^  ^1_.  1979), the standard SMB procedure
modified for shallow water (CERC 1973; Pore  1979)  has  been used and is be-
lieved to give satisfactory results.   This procedure gives wave height and
period and water velocities throughout the water column  as a function of the
wind velocity and fetch.

    Additional theoretical work  (Kajiura  1968) is  then necessary to deter-
mine the bottom stress.  Recent  work has  attempted to extend the analysis  to
the case where waves and currents are  considered simultaneously in their ef-
fect on bottom stress (Grant and Madsen 1979).   However, no substantive
field work has been done to verify these  analyses  and this needs to be done.

Currents —
    Of course, to solve Equation (1),  one  must also  know the currents in the
lake.  These may readily be obtained from  present  three-dimensional time-
dependent numerical analyses.  For a non-stratified  lake, this  procedure is
relatively well understood, at least in principle, even  though  the practical
application of this knowledge leaves much  to be  desired.  In contrast, the
temperatures, currents, and the  dispersion of  contaminants in a stratified
lake are not well understood, not even in  principle, although progress is
being made in this respect.

                                    266

-------
    Thermal  stratification significantly affects the dispersion  of  contami-
nants  in  a lake but the effects are not quantitatively understood.   For
example,  it  is necessary to know how contaminants are transported from the
hypolimnion  to the epilimnion.  That is, after contaminants  are  released  in
the hypolimnion, do they mainly diffuse vertically or are they convected
horizontally to a near-shore area and then diffused and convected vertically
into the  epilimnion?  Also, due to thermal stratification, strong internal
waves  and hypolimnetic currents may be present in sufficient strength to
cause  entrainment of bottom sediments.  These processes are  presently being
investigated by means of a two-dimensional model of a stratified lake
(Heinrich et al_. 1979).

Characteristic Times —
    Particulate matter is transported vertically through the water  column to
the sediment-water interface by a combination of convection, settling, and
turbulent diffusion.  Vertical convection is generally only  significant
where  strong upwelling and downwelling occur, e.g., in near-shore regions,
while  settling and turbulent diffusion are ubiquitous phenomena.  A charac-
teristic  time for settling is ts = h/ws while a characteristic time  for tur-
bulent diffusion is tdiff = h2/2Dv, where h is the depth of the water
column.   These times are equal when h = 2Dv/w$.  For shallow waters  where
h <_ 2Dy/ws,  turbulent diffusion dominates and settling can be neglected to  a
first  approximation.  As an example, for the Western Basin of Lake  Erie, h  =
7m, Dy =  25  cm2/sec, and ws = 2.5 x 10~2 cm/sec.  Hence, ts  = 3 x 104 sec
while  t
-------
    Although the above procedure will  serve  to  verify the short-term resus-
pension, transport, and deposition processes, the  major  question is the ul-
timate fate of contaminants and this  involves time scales of months and
years.  Once the short-term processes  are understood  and verified,  it is
then necessary to do a long-term calculation and verification.   By  a long-
term calculation, I mean either a one-year calculation under actual condi-
tions or a set of short-term calculations statistically-averaged over a
year.  The latter may be more efficient and  also statistically  correct con-
sidering the short time scales associated with  the resuspension-deposition
cycle as compared to a year or the long time scales for  deposition  and ulti-
mate consolidation.  This long-term verification must be made by comparison
of model output with sediment accumulation rates and/or  accumulation in the
sediments of other easily measured and easily modeled substances such as
radioactive materials.

Other Contaminants

    Sediments are a relatively simple  contaminant  to  model  since no bio-
chemical transformations are involved.  In attempting to predict the ulti-
mate fate of other contaminants, quite complex  cnemical  and  biological
transformations must be considered as  well as the  physical  processes dis-
cussed above.  These transformations occur not  only in the  water column but
also in the bottom sediments and in aquatic  organisms.

    The basic mass balance equation for any  substance is simply Equation (1)
with the addition of a source-sink term S which describes these biochemical
transformations.  For radioactive materials, the next easiest contaminant  to
model after sediments, this source-sink term is given by S  = -AC, where I/A
is the radioactive decay time.  Because of the  simplicity of this reaction
and because of the observational data  available (e.g., Robbins  1979; Robbins
and Edgington 1979a,b) it is possible  to develop and  verify a model of
transport of radioactive materials relatively simply  compared to other con-
taminants.  With radioactive materials and with other contaminants  as well,
processes occurring in the sediments such as benthic  activity,  chemical
transformations and diffusion, and resuspension and deposition  processes are
especially important and must be considered  in  the interpretation of verti-
cal sediment concentration profiles.

    Nutrients are another important class of contaminants  and their ultimate
disposition is an important problem.   Water  quality models  (which describe
the interactions between nutrients, phytoplankton,  and zooplankton) are
available (Bierman 1979; Thomann et_ _al_. 1976; DiToro  1979)  and  are  con-
stantly being improved.  These models  are presently being coupled with
hydrodynamic models, at least in a crude sense.  It is becoming more evident
that transfer of nutrients to and from the bottom  sediments, particularly
when the lake is stratified, is a significant factor  in  the  overall nutrient
mass balance equation.  Experimental and theoretical  work has been  done
(Mortimer 1941, 1942, 1971; DiToro 1979) and is being done  to understand
this process better.  Detailed analyses coupling this sediment  work and
hydrodynamic models with water quality models needs to be done.
                                     268

-------
    Probably the most important class of contaminants  in  lakes  at  the  pre-
sent are the toxic chlorinated hydrocarbons.  Although the  physical  pro-
cesses by which they are transported are generally understood,  their bio-
chemical transformations are not generally quantitatively known.   A  descrip-
tion of their ultimate fate depends on obtaining this  information.

    With many hazardous substances, it is also imperative to consider  the
accumulation of these substances throughout the aquatic food chain.  A dis-
cussion of this problem and the appropriate equations for dispersal  in the
aquatic system and accumulation in the aquatic food chain is given by
Thomann (1979).


THE RESUSPENSION, TRANSPORT, AND DEPOSITION OF SEDIMENTS  IN THE WESTERN
BASIN OF LAKE ERIE

    The Western Basin of Lake Erie is quite wide, with an average  width of
approximately 50 km, but is extremely shallow, with an average  depth of only
7 m.  Because of this and because of large inputs of sediments  from  the
Maumee and Detroit Rivers and from shore erosion, large sediment concentra-
tions and especially large variations in sediment concentration are  present
in the Western Basin.

    These large variations in sediment concentration make the Western  Basin
particularly amenable to sediment transport analyses.  In addition,  an ex-
cellent surface sediment concentration data base is available.  This data
base consists of synoptic maps every few days of surface sediment  concentra-
tions in March and April 1976 and was made by means of aircraft overflights.
For these reasons, it was decided to model the sediment transport  in the
Western Basin of Lake Erie.

    In order to have a valid, predictive analysis of sediment transport, it
is necessary to know (1) the resuspension and deposition rates  as  a  function
of the applied stress for sediments throughout the area being investigated,
(2) the bottom stress as caused by the combined action of waves and  cur-
rents, and (3) the currents as determined by winds, throughflow, and any
possible stratification.  These components must then be coupled with the
sediment mass balance equation, Equation (1), to give the sediment concen-
tration as a function of position and time.  A summary of our work on  these
problems for the Western Basin of Lake Erie follows.

Resuspension and Deposition Rates

    Experimental work has been done by us to determine the  resuspension and
deposition rates for sediments from the Western Basin  (Fukuda 1978;  Fukuda
and Lick 1979; Lee 1979).  The experiments were done in a circular flume
(see Figure 3) with an outer radius of 66 cm and an inner radius of  51 cm
for a channel width of 15 cm.  The top rotates and produces a shear  flow
which in turn exerts a shear stress on the sediment-water interface.  Velo-
city profiles were carefully measured and were used to determine this  shear
stress as a function of ring rotation rate.


                                    269

-------
                               •66 cm
 T
30.5 cm
       i^_—^-*
                               51 cm —+]

in
            \i\\\\i\\\\\\\\\mi\\m
HAT

              Figure 3. Side view of the flume.

-------
    The sediments were placed in the flume  and  allowed  to  settle for periods
of one to ten days until the desired water  content  was  reached.   The top was
then rotated at a prescribed rate corresponding  to  the  desired  shear stress.
Due to this stress, the suspended sediment  concentration increased  with time
until  a steady state was reached.

    A typical variation of concentration with time  is shown  in  Figure 4.
The entrainment parameters (E, Ceq, and 6)  were  obtained from data  of this
type,  i.e., Ceq is steady state concentration,  E can be determined  from-the
initial slope of the concentration versus time  curve, and  $  can  then be cal-
culated from 3 = E/Ceq.

    Typical results for the entrainment rate for three  different types of
sediments (a shale-based sediment with a high clay  content of 68%,  a sedi-
ment from the Western Basin with a clay content  of  38%, and  a sediment from
the near-shore of the Central Basin with a  clay  content of 34%)  are shown in
Figure 5.  It is quite clear that the entrainment rate  varies rapidly with
the applied shear stress and bulk sediment  water content and also depends
strongly on the sediment type.  Results for Ceq  show similar variations.
The entrainment rates on a linear scale for the  Western Basin sediments are
shown in Figure 6.  It can be seen that E increases rapidly  near a  critical
stress but then increases less rapidly at higher stresses.   More work is
being done at these higher stresses to better delineate these parameter
variations.

    The variation of the reflectivity parameter  3 with  applied  shear stress
is shown in Figure 7.  It can be seen that  the  variation of  B is rather
small  compared to the variations in E and Ceq.   The average  value of 6 for
all three sediments is 8.4 x 10~3 cm/sec with a  standard deviation  of _+
5.9 x 10~3 cm/sec.

    Additional work has been done on other  sediments from  the Western Basin
(Lee 1979).  From these latter experiments, it  can  be shown  that, although
the general functional dependences of E, Ceq, and B on  shear stress and
water content are similar for all sediments tested, the values  of these
parameters change from one sediment to another  by as much  as two orders of
magnitude.  This obviously has a significant effect on  sediment  concentra-
tions and sediment transport.

Wave Action and Bottom Stress

    Surface waves are generated by the winds through energy  transfer from
the winds to the waves.  Although recent theoretical developments are useful
in understanding the wind-wave energy transfer mechanisms, the  most useful
procedures for predicting wave parameters are the semi-empirical methods
such as the PNJ method developed by Pierson, Neumann, and  James  (1955) and
the SMB method developed by Sverdrup, Munk, and  Bretschneider (Sverdrup and
Munk 1947; Bretschneider 1958).

    The SMB method as modified for shallow  water (Bretschneider  1958; CERC
1973)  has been used in our calculations.  These  relations  give  the  signifi-
cant wave height H and significant wave period T as a function  of wind speed

                                    271

-------
             c
          (mg/l)
ro
•^i
ro
                                                                 U
                                                                       curve fit

                                                                                 -4      2
                                                                       E  =3.3x10  mg /cm  -see
                             Ceq = 49


                             £ = 6-5* I0
                                              "~
                                                cm /sec
                                                                       TW = 0.92 dynes /cm

                                                                       % HgO = 61.7 %
                                                                     1
                             20
40
60
80     100    120    140


   TIME   (min)
!60
180
200
          Figure 4.  Example of the concentration time history data for  the shallow-based sediment with
                               TW = 0.92 dynes/cm2  and a water content  of 6.7%.

-------
                         SHALE

                       • 61-62%
                       |63-68 %
                       • 69-70%
                       A 73-75%
   WESTERN
    BASIN

  O 76-77%
  Q 79-81 %
  <> 81-82%
 CENTRAL
   BASIN

A  68.0%
O  71-73%
£  74-78 %
0  77.9%
O  80.3 %
      K>
( mg/cm  -sec)
               -2
               .3
               -4
                 J

                 0
  234
rw  (dynes/cm2)
  Figure 5.  The entrainment rate as a function  of  the average boundary
     shear stress for the shale-based, Western  Basin, and Central
                           Basin sediments.
                                  273

-------
                      5r
          E x 10'
  (mg/cm  -sec)   2
  %H20

O 79 - 83 %
D 76- 79 %
rrr
2
i
4
s i
1
6
' /4v
-------
   £x 10 *
( cm / sec )
             3.5
             3.0
             2.5
            2.0
             1.5
             1.0
            0.5
                      SHALE
                     • 61-62 %
                     H 63-65 %
                     ^69-70%
                     A 73-75%
  % H20

 WESTERN
  BASIN
O76-78%
D 79-81 %
O 81 - 82 %
                   O
  CENTRAL
   BASIN
A 68.0 %
Q 71-73 %
0 74-75%
Q 77-81 %
                               4       6
                           _               2
                           rw  ( dynes / cm  )
                                              8
                   10
Figure 7.   The  reflectivity parameter as a function of shear
       stress for  the shale-based, Western Basin,  and
                  Central Basin sediments.
                             275

-------
U, fetch length F, and mean depth D.  From these  relations  and  assuming in-
viscid flow/ the horizontal periodic flow at the  sediment-water interface
can be determined.  Near this interface, of course,  a  turbulent boundary
layer occurs and produces a shear stress on the sediment-water  interface.

    In general, this maximum shear stress TW can  be  written  as

                      = CfwP U2                                         (5)
Tw
where P is the water density, U is the maximum velocity just  outside  the
boundary layer, and Cfw is a bottom friction coefficient which  depends  on
both surface roughness and flow characteristics in the wave boundary  layer.
Kajiura (1968) has analyzed this problem and developed a relationship be-
tween Cf and R where R = U/(av)l/2, v is the kinematic viscosity,  and a is
the wave frequency.  This relationship is shown in Figure 8.

    By use of the above equations and parameters, we have developed a
numerical routine to give wave amplitude, period, bottom velocity,  and  bot-
tom stress as a function of wind speed for any location on Lake Erie  (Kang
et^ aJL 1979).  Typical results are shown in Figures 9a, b, and  c for  the
Western Basin and for a South-West wind at a speed of  11.2 m/sec  (25  mi/hr).
Of most interest for the present purposes is Figure 9c which  shows  the  bot-
tom stress.  It can be seen that in much of the Western Basin the  bottom
stress is greater than one dyne/cm^ and therefore at least the  fine surfi-
cial sediments can be readily resuspended.  Along the  northern  shore, bottom
stresses of 5 to 10 dynes/cm^ are present leading to entrainment of all but
the coarsest particles.  As can be seen in Figures 9a, b, c,  a  difficulty
with the present analysis is that it does not include  effects of wave dif-
fraction and refraction, effects which are obviously important  in  the lee
of the islands.

Currents

    The wind-driven currents were calculated by means  of a two-mode,  time-
dependent, free-surface model (Sheng and Lick 1979).   Basic assumptions of
the model were that the pressure varied hydrostatically, eddy coefficients
were used to account for turbulent diffusion in both the horizontal and
vertical  directions, and the density was constant.  Vertically  stretched
coordinates were used.

    At the free surface, the wind stress was specified.  At the sediment-
water interface, the shear stress TC due to currents was given  by

                   Tc = PcfcuB I UB!                                     (6)

where Cfc = .004 and is a dimensionless skin friction  coefficient  (Sternberg
1972) and  ]UB| is the magnitude of the bottom flow velocity ug.

An Analysis of a Specific Event

    The above investigations of sediment resuspension  and deposition, wave
action, and currents were coupled with the sediment mass balance equation,

                                      276

-------
  10-2-
 IO"3
Figure 8.  Friction coefficient as a function of Reynolds number
         for an  oscillatory flow over a smooth bottom.
                             277

-------
                                           N
            10  Mi
           I	h—H
            16.1  Km
                                            WIND
                                            DIRECTION
Figure 9a.   Significant wave height in meters for a winds speed of
          11.2 m/sec  (25 mi/hr) and a southwest wind.
                            278

-------
                                             N
                                                WIND
                                                DIRECTION
             10 Mi
           I	1	1
           16.1 Km
Figure 9b.  Significant wave period in seconds for a winds speed of
          11.2 m/sec (25 mi/hr)  and a southwest wind.
                            279

-------
                                            N
                                              WIND
                                              DIRECTION
           16.1 Km
Figure 9c.   Bottom stress in dynes/cm  for a wind speed of
      11.2 m/sec (25  mi/hr) and a southwest wind.
                         280

-------
Equation  (1),  and used to calculate the sediment concentrations  during a
specific,  short-term event from 8 March to 11 March,  1976  in  the Western
Basin (Sheng  and Lick 1979).

    In the numerical calculations, a one-mile grid was  used  in the  Western
Basin and  was  coupled with an eight-mile grid throughout the  rest of  the
lake.  Seven  points in the vertical were used.  Wind  data  at  hourly inter-
vals from  nine weather stations were used to generate the  wind field  over
the lake.   A  settling speed for the sediments of 0.05 cm/sec  was assumed.
The results are not sensitive to the value of this parameter.  To estimate
the bottom shear stresses due to the combined action  of waves and currents,
it was assumed that the time-averaged shear stress Tg was  given  by


                        1  T   ,
                  TB  =T  j{   |Tw+ Td dT                              (7)


where TW and  TC are given by Equations (5) and  (6) respectively  and T is
the wave  period.

    The sediment concentration data at noon, 8  March, 1976  (obtained  from
aircraft  imagery and surface ships) were taken  as initial  data to the sedi-
ment transport model and are shown in Figure 10.  The calculation was con-
tinued until  noon, 11 March.  The observations  and the computed  results  at
this time  are  shown in Figures 11 and 12.

    It can be  seen that near the southern shore there is reasonable agree-
ment between  the observations and the calculations.   In other areas,  signi-
ficant discrepancies exist.  It is believed that the major reason for this
is an inadequate knowledge of the sediment resuspension and deposition rates
throughout the Basin.  Recent work (Lee 1979) has indicated that significant
variations in  sediment entrainment rates occur  throughout  the Basin.   In
particular, near the mouth of the Detroit River, the  entrainment rate has
been found to  be less than the rate used in the calculation above by  ap-
proximately a  factor of ten.  Other areas also  showed much  lower entrainment
rates than the one used above.

    In addition, in the calculations, since no  data was available,  no ac-
count was  taken of the change of entrainment rate with depth, a  variation
that surely must be significant.  It is also believed that the bottom
stresses  are  not adequately specified.  More work is  needed to analyze pro-
perly and  especially to verify the stresses due to the combined  actions  of
waves and  currents.
TRANSPORT IN  THE CENTRAL BASIN OF LAKE ERIE DURING SUMMER  STRATIFICATION:
A TWO-DIMENSIONAL MODEL

    The  Central  Basin of Lake Erie is wide, flat, and  shallow  (see  Figure
1).   The Basin  stratifies during the summer with a thermocline  generally at
a depth  of 16 to 20 m and only a few meters from the bottom.  The epilimnion
temperatures  in  late summer are near 20°C while the hypolimnion temperatures

                                    281

-------
                            I DETROIT R
SCALE
SUSPENDED  SOLIDS, MG/L
   A  10   F  100
   B  20   6  125
   C  30   H  ISO
   D  50    I  175
   E  75
                                                                N
    Figure 10.  Near-surface  total  suspended solids map for the
           Western Basin  of Lake  Erie on March 8, 1976.
                                 282

-------
                                            CONCENTRATION
                                                ( MG/L)
                                                A   5
                                                B    10
                                                C    25
                                                0   5O
                                                E
                                                F
                                                6
                                                H
75
100
150
200
Figure 11.   Observed surface sediment concentrations for the
       Western Basin of Lake Erie on March 11,  1976.
                          283

-------
ro
oo
CONCENTRATION

    ( MG/L)

    A    5
B
C
0
E
F
G
H
I
10
25
50
75
100
150
200
250
            Figure  12.  Calculated surface sediment concentrations on the Western Basin of Lake  Erie

                                             on March  11, 1976.

-------
 are near 10°C to  12°C.   The  stratification and the oxygen demand of the
 sediments generally  leads  to anoxic  conditions in the hypolimnion of the
 Central Basin in  late  summer.   This  has a significant effect on water
 quality and motivated  our  present  work  on stratified flow.

    Flow in a stratified lake  and  the  change with time of this stratifica-
 tion are not well understood and much  field work and numerical experiments
 need to be done in order to  understand  and model the effects of different
 parameters on this stratification  and  the associated currents.  Three-dimen-
 sional, time-dependent models  of  lake  circulation including the effects of
 thermal stratification have  been  developed and preliminary calculations of
 stratified flow have been  made.   However, these three-dimensional models are
 relatively difficult to  use  and consume considerable amounts of computer
 time.

    In order to do the numerical  experiments efficiently and therefore be
 able to investigate the  effects of various parameters more readily,  we have
 developed a two-dimensional, time-dependent model of a stratified lake
 (Heinrich, Lick and Paul  1979).   In  this  model,  a cross-section of an in-
 finitely long lake is  considered.  It  is  assumed that properties of  the flow
 vary only in the  vertical  direction  z  and one horizontal  direction x but not
 in the other horizontal  direction  y.  Coriolis forces are included.   A pres-
 sure gradient in  the y-direction  is  assumed such that the net flux in the y-
 direction at any  time  is zero.

    The horizontal eddy  diffusivity  and conductivity have been assumed con-
 stant.  The vertical eddy  conductivity  Kv has been assumed to have the
 general form
Kv =
Ks (C, •
* C2e-z/D)
                      * °
                                   ZZ/D
                                                                        (8)
                             w
where Ks is a function of the wind stress -TW  and  the  depth  h,  where  C],  C2,
tf2, and D are empirical constants, g  is the gravitational acceleration,  and
a is the thermal expansion coefficient given  by
a = 1.5 x 10'5 (T-4) - 2.0 x  1(T7  (T-4)2
                                                                        (9)
where the temperature T is in degrees Centigrade.  An  analogous  form for the
vertical  eddy diffusivity is
              A  =
              A
A. (C
 s
              ,
               '
                                C2e-z/D)
                           ego.

                           |Tw|
where As is a function of the wind stress and depth  and  a-j  is  an  empirical
constant.
                                     285

-------
    Only representative calculations  from this  model  are presented here.  A
more complete set of  calculations  and a  discussion  of the model are given in
the report  by Heinrich, Lick  and Paul  (1979).

Constant Depth Basin

    To  investigate the effects  of  various parameters  without the complica-
tions due to a complex geometry, a series of  calculations was made for a
constant depth basin  100  km wide and  25  m deep,  dimensions which approxi-
mate the Central Basin of Lake  Erie.   In one  such calculation, the following
was assumed:  an initial, spatially uniform temperature  of 6°C, a zero ini-
tial velocity, a constant heat  flux of 0.003  cal/cm2-sec, a wind stress  of
1.0 dynes/cm*, C-j = C2 =  1.0, 02 = .0045, a-j  =  3a2  =  .0135, D = 2000 cm,
As = Ks = 15.0 cm2/sec, and AH  = KH = 10° cm2/sec.

    In  the  calculations,  after  an  initial  transient,  a quasi-steady state
results in  which the  velocities and temperatures are  changing relatively
slowly.  At 30 days,  only a mild stratification  is  present as can be seen
in Figure 13a.  The associated  velocities are shown in Figures 13b and 13c.

    At  later times, the thermocline develops much more strongly and inhibits
the flow.   At 90 days, the results  for the temperature and velocity fields
are as  shown in Figures 14a,  b, and c.   It can  be seen that a strong thermo-
cline has formed at 15 to 16  m, the epilimnion  temperatures are 15°C to  18°C
while the hypolimnion temperatures  are 12°C to  14°C.   The flow is largely
restricted  to the epilimnion  with  a strong return flow near the top of the
thermocline.

    Additional calculations were made  to investigate  the effects of varying
the heat flux, the level  of turbulence,  and the  depth  of the basin.   In-
creasing the heat flux causes the  thermocline to form  higher and earlier,
the hypolimnion temperatures  to be  lower,  the epilimnion temperatures  to be
higher, and the convection to penetrate  less deeply.   A  change in heat flux
from 0.003  cal/cm2-sec to 0.004 cal/cm2-sec caused  a  decrease in the thermo-
cline depth of 2 to 3 m,  a significant variation when  this change is com-
pared with  an average hypolimnion  thickness of  only 5  m.   Decreasing the
level of turbulence,  i.e., decreasing  the magnitude of the eddy coefficients
K  and A  for example from 15 cm2/sec  to 10 cm2/sec,  caused the depth  of the
thermocline to decrease by 2  to 3  m,  an  effect  similar to increasing the
heat flux.

    Increasing the depth  of the basin  to 30 m,  35 m,  or  40 m caused the
thermocline to form deeper.   The thermocline was also  more diffuse.   In-
creasing the basin depth  even further  caused  little further change in  the
thermocline depth.   Decreasing the  basin depth  below  25  m decreased the
depth of the thermocline  and  delayed  its  formation.   From these calcula-
tions, it was quite evident that,  for  depths comparable  to those found in
the Central  Basin of Lake Erie, the basin depth  significantly influenced the
thermocline depth and structure.

    An interesting result which appeared in many of our  calculations was the
formation of a second thermocline  above  the first thermocline some time

                                     286

-------
             WIND =  6  M/ SEC
no
00
           Oi-
          25
                           20
            60

WIDTH  ( KM )
100
              Figure 13a.  Temperature distribution at 30 days for constant depth basin.

-------
CO
00
             WIND =  6 M/SEC
     VELOCITY  SCALES

HORIZONTAL *. -*    10 CM/SEC

  VERTICAL :      .025 MM/SEC
\J
5
2E 90


JE 15
Q,
UJ
Q 20
OK
C.9
(
r ^^.^, . ..y _ ^y. 	 ^ 	 _y 	 _y_ 	 .,,_ 	 .y 	 J J J ^ . ^
S* ^
t TTTT^TTTTTTT^*
- \ ------------ \
\ ;;::;;;:; ; : ; (
- \ I i . .,:::::. :7
\^^^^ 	 ^^^j
\^^^..*^«.^^fc^,^



**.*.*-- 	
) 20 40 60 80 l<









DO
                                        WIDTH ( KM )
                 Figure 13b.  Velocities (u and w) at 30 days for constant depth basin.

-------
                 WIND = 6  M/ SEC
INi
co
               0



               5



              10
X  ,5

Q.
UJ
0  20
              25
                              20
                                                 10.0
                                                  7.5
                                                  5.0
                                                  2.5
                                                   0
                                                 -2.5
                                                           -5.0
                                   40           60

                                    WIDTH   ( KM )
80
100
         Figure 13c.  Velocities  perpendicular to cross-section at 30 days for constant depth basin.

-------
                  WIND «  6 M/ SEC
ro
UD
o
              25
                              20
40           60

 WIDTH  ( KM )
80
                                                                                     100
                   Figure 14a.  Temperature distribution at 90 days for constant depth basin.

-------
ro
          WIND -  6 M/SEC
                                                     VELOCITY  SCALES


                                               HORIZONTAL ! -*•   10 CM / SEC
             VERTICAL  I
                                                                  .025  MM /SEC
       Q.
       UJ
       Q
          10
          15
          20
          25
                5
                f   -
                                                            *   <

                                                            *   t
                       ^
                        20
^
40
 I
60
80
100
                                     WIDTH  ( KM )
               Figure 14b.  Velocities  (u and w) at 90 days for constant depth basin.

-------
               WIND =  6 M/SEC
ro
Q.
UJ
O
 0


  5


 10


 15


20


25
                            20
                                  40           60

                                   WIDTH  ( KM  )
                                                           80
100
        Figure 14c.  Velocities perpendicular to cross-section at 90 days for constant depth basin.

-------
after  the  formation of the first thermocline.  This phenomena  is  mainly due
to the temperature dependence of the thermal expansion coefficient  a.
Multiple  thermoclines have been observed in  lakes and it  is  interesting to
speculate  whether the above mechanism may be partly responsible for  the ob-
served phenomena.

Variable  Depth Basin

    A  series  of calculations was also made for a more realistic geometry
corresponding to a section across the Central Basin of Lake  Erie  from
Ashtabula, Ohio to Port Stanley, Ontario (see Figure 1).  Only one  set  of
calculations, chosen to illustrate the formation, maintenance, and  decay of
the thermocline, is presented here.  Assumed values of the parameters are:
GI = 0.5,  C2  = 1.5, a-| = a2 = .001875, D = 900 0112, As =  Ks  =  15  cm2/sec,
AH = 106cm2/sec, and KH = 3 x 105cm2/sec.

    For the first 50 days, it was assumed that the heat flux was  0.003
cal/cm2-sec and the wind stress was 0.75 dynes/cm2 with the  wind  directed
from left  to  right.  At 50 days, the temperature and velocity fields were as
shown  in  Figures 15a, b, and c.  A thermocline has formed at approximately
16 m depth with the hypolimnion temperatures from 10°C to 12°C.   Both of
these  results are in agreement with observations.

    Starting  at 50 days, the heat flux was reduced in a linear manner such
that the  heat flux was zero at 120 days and negative thereafter.  At 50
days,  the  wind direction was reversed for a period of 25  days at  which  time
it was returned to its original direction, from left to right.  The  effect
of the wind reversal was to eliminate a second thermocline which  tended to
form when  the wind was not reversed.  Little effect of this  reversal on the
temperature structure other than this was noted.

    The temperature fields after 80, 120, 150, and 180 days  are shown in
Figures 16, 17, 18, and 19.  At 120 days, the heat flux has  decreased to
zero,  the  epilimnion temperatures are 18°C to 19°C while  the hypolimnion
temperatures  are 12°C to 14°C.  At 180 days, the heat flux is negative  and
the lake  is rapidly cooling, the thermocline has disappeared and  the temper-
atures throughout are between 13°C to 15°C.

    These  calculations are in reasonable agreement with observations.   Addi-
tional improvements can be made to the model and the parameters can  be  re-
fined  further so as to more closely approximate actual conditions.   However,
at this point, three-dimensional effects tend to become important and
further improvements need to be made in conjunction with  numerical  results
from three-dimensional calculations.

    Stratification obviously has a significant effect on  the transport  of
contaminants.  Calculations are presently being made to investigate  this
further.   Results of two preliminary calculations are presented here.   In
these  calculations, a steady state flow field as assumed  corresponding
approximately to that shown in Figure 16 (80 days).
                                     293

-------
      WIND =  6 M/ SEC
   5.5
a.
UJ
QI6.5
   22
                                40           60

                                  WIDTH   ( KM )
80
100
      Figure 15a.  Temperature distribution at 50 days for variable depth basin.

-------
ro
i-D
en
WIND =  4.5  M/SEC
           0,-
                                                     VELOCITY  SCALES
                                                HORIZONTAL:  -»•    10 CM/SEC
                                                  VERTICAL :  |    .025 MM / SEC
                                    40          60
                                    WIDTH  ( KM )
                                                 80
100
              Figure 15b.  Velocities (u and w) at 50 days for variable depth basin.

-------
                   WIND  =4.5  M/ SEC
ro
UD
cr>
                 Or
            ~ 5.5
Q.
UJ
              '(6.5 -
                                20
                                  40           60

                                    WIDTH  ( KM  )
too
           Figure 15c.   Velocities perpendicular  to cross-section at 50 days for variable depth basin,

-------
               WIND =4.5  M / SEC
ho
UD
             Oi-
                       19,0    18.0      17.0     16.5
               0
40            60

  WIDTH   (  KM)
                  Figure 16.  Temperature distribution  at 80 days for variable depth basin.

-------
              WIND *  4.5  M/SEC
                                  19.0
ro
UD
CO
           22
                           20
40            60

 WIDTH  (  KM )
              Figure 17.  Temperature distribution at 120 days for variable depth basin.

-------
                       WIND" 4.5  M/SEC
INS

-------
                WIND * 4.5  M/SEC
U)
o
o
                            20
40          60

 WIDTH  ( KM )
80
100
              Figure 19.  Temperature distribution at 180 days for variable depth basin.

-------
    In  the  first calculation, it was assumed that a contaminant  was  instan-
taneously released at time zero at the surface approximately  in  the  middle
of the  lake (actually at a point 53 km from the  left side).   The  amount  re-
leased  was  6.11  x 103 gm/cm (corresponding to an initial concentration  in
one cell  volume  of 100 x 10-6 gm/cm3).  At 30 days, the concentrations  are
shown in  Figure  20.   The concentrations are greatest near the surface but a
considerable amount  of material is also present  in the hypolimnion.  At
earlier times, the contaminant is mainly restricted to the epilimnion.   The
contaminant is then  transported to the right by  surface currents.  Near  the
shore,  it is convected and mixed vertically into the hypolimnion  and is  then
convected to the left by currents in the hypolimnion and lower part  of  the
epilimnion.

    In  the  second calculation, the same amount of contaminant was released
at the  same horizontal location but at the bottom of the lake.  Figure  21
shows the concentrations at 10 days.  It can be  seen that the contaminant is
restricted  to the hypolimnion.  This is because  vertical mixing through  the
thermocline in the middle of the lake is small and horizontal hypolimnetic
currents  are also small.  For later times, the contaminant does mix  and  con-
vect vertically  near shore and it then appears in the epilimnion.


SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

    Along with  a general discussion of the factors affecting  the  transport
of contaminants  in a lake, two specific events have been analyzed:   (1)
sediment  transport in the Western Basin of Lake  Erie, and (2) the tempera-
tures,  currents, and the transport of contaminants in the Central Basin  of
Lake Erie during summer stratification.

    Reasonable  and encouraging agreement between the results  of the  calcula-
tions and observations was obtained.  Nevertheless, it is also obvious that
a great deal more needs to be done before realistic, quantitative, predic-
tive models of contaminant transport are developed and available  for use.

    For sediment transport, the research needs are:  (1) more qualitative
and quantitative knowledge of the entrainment and deposition  processes for
a wide  variety of sediments in lakes, (2) further investigation  and  verifi-
cation  of bottom stresses due to the combined action of waves and currents,
and (3) additional calculations of sediment transport and verification  of
these calculations,  especially for long-term events.

    For stratified flow, it is necessary to further investigate,  model  and
verify:  (1) short-term events such as upwelling and downwelling  due to
strong  winds, (2) the formation, maintenance, and decay of the thermocline
and associated currents, and (3) the dispersion of contaminants  during  both
short-term  and  long-term events, especially when there is coupling between
the stratification,  sediment-water exchange, and biochemical  processes  in
the water column.
                                      301

-------
                 WIND =4.5 M/SEC
               Oi-
to
o
              22
                                            40            60

                                             WIDTH   ( KM )
80
100
      Figure  20.  Contaminant concentration at 30 days after release at surface and 53  km from left side.

-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    This  research was funded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Mr.  David M.  Dolan was the Project Officer.


REFERENCES

Bierman,  V.J.,  D.M. Dolan, E.F. Stoermer, J.E. Gannon, V.E. Smith.  1979.
    The development and calibration of a multi-class, internal pool, phyto-
    plankton  model for Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron.  U.S. Environmental Pro-
    tection Agency Report.

Bretschneider,  C.L.  1958.  Revisions in wave forecasting:  Deep and shallow
    water.  Proc. Sixth Conf. on Coastal Eng., Ch. 3, pp. 30-67.

Coastal Engineering Research Center.  1973.  Shore protection manual, Vol.
    1.

DiToro, D.M.  and J.F. Connoly.  1979.  Mathematical models of water quality
    in  large  lakes, Part II.  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Report.

DiToro, D.M.   1979.  Species dependent mass transport and chemical equili-
    bria:  Application to Chesapeake Bay sediments.  To be published.

Fisher, J.B., P. McCall, W. Lick, J.A. Robbins.  1979.  The mixing of lake
    sediments by the deposit feeder, Tubifex tubifex.  To be published.

Fisher, J.B.  and W. Lick.  1979.  Effects of tubificid oligochaetes on the
    flux  of conservative and non-conservative solutes across the sediment-
    water interface.  To be published.

Fukuda, M.K.   1978.  The entrainment of cohesive sediments in fresh water,
    Ph.D. Thesis, Case Western Reserve University.

Fukuda, M.K.  and W. Lick.  1979.  The entrainment of cohesive sediments in
    fresh water.  To be published.

Grant,  W.D. and O.S. Madsen.  1979.  Combined wave and current interaction
    with  a rough bottom.  J. Geophysical Research, Vol. 84.

Heinrich, J.C., W. Lick, and J. Paul.  1979.  The temperature, currents, and
    the dispersion of contaminants in a stratified lake - A two-dimensional
    model.  Presented at the Twenty-Second Conference on Great Lakes Re-
    search.

Kajiura,  K.  1968.  A model of the bottom boundary layer in water waves.
    Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst., 46.

Kang, S.W., P.  Sheng, and W. Lick.  1979.  Wave generation in Lake Erie.  To
    be  published.


                                     303

-------
Lee, D.Y.  1979.  Resuspension and deposition of lake sediments.  M.S.
    Thesis, Case Western Reserve University.

Lick, W., J. Paul, and P. Sheng.  1976.  The dispersion of contaminants in
    the near-shore region.  Modeling Biochemical Processes in Aquatic
    Ecosystems, Ann Arbor Science Publishers.

Mortimer, C.H.  1941.  The exchange of dissolved substances between mud and
    water, I and II.  J. Ecol., Vol. 29.

Mortimer, C.H.  1942.  The exchange of dissolved substances between mud and
    water in lakes, III and IV.  J. Ecol.

Mortimer, C.H.  1971.  Chemical exchanges between sediments and water in the
    Great Lakes.  Limnology Oceanography,, 16.

Owen, M.W.  1978.   Problems in the modeling of transport, erosion, and de-
    position of cohesive sediments.  Vol. 6S The Sea, Ed. Goldberg.

Pierson, W.H., G.  Neumann, and R.W. James.  1955.  Practical methods for ob-
    serving and forecasting ocean waves by means of wave spectra and statis-
    tics.  H.O. Publ. 603, U.S. Navy Hydrographic Office, Washington, D.C.

Pore, N.E.  1979.   Verification of automated Great Lakes wave forecasts of
    the National Weather Service.  To be published.

Robbins, J.A.  1979.  Cesium-137 in the sediments of Lake Huron.  Presented
    at the Twenty-Second Conference on Great Lakes Research.

Robbins, J.A. and  D.N. Edgington.  1979a.  The distribution of Cesium-137 in
    Lake Erie.  Presented at the Twenty-Second Conference on Great Lakes
    Research.

Robbins, J.A. and  D.N. Edgington.  1979b.  History of plutonium deposition
    in Lake Erie sediments.  Presented at the Twenty-Second Conference on
    Great Lakes Research.

Sheng, P. and W. Lick.  1979.  The transport and resuspension of sediments
    in a shallow lake.  J. Geophysical Research, Vol. 84.

Sly, P.G.  1978.  Sedimentary processes in lakes:  Chemistry, geology,
    physics, Ed. A. Lerman, Springer-Verlag.

Sternberg, R.W.  1972.  Predicting initial motion and bedload transport of
    sediment particles in the shallow marine environment.  ln_ Shelf Sediment
    Transport, Process and Pattern.  Ed. D.J.B. Swift, D.B. Duane, O.H.
    Pilkey.  Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross Pub.s Stroudsberg, Pennsylvania.

Sverdrup, H.U. and W.H. Munk.  1947.  Wind, sea, and swell:  Theory of rela-
    tions for forecasting.  Hydrographic Office Publ. 601, U.S. Dept. of the
    Navy, Washington, D.C.

                                     304

-------
Terwindt,  J.H.J.
    Interactions
 1977.  Deposition, transportation, and erosion of mud.
Between Sediments and Freshwater, Ed. golterman.
                                                                       In
Thomann,  R.V.   1979.   A trophic length model of the fate of hazardous sub-
    stances  in  the aquatic food chain.  To be published.

Thomann,  R.V.,  R.P.  Winfield, D.M.  DiToro, D.J. O'Connor.  1976.  Mathemati-
cal modeling of phytoplankton in Lake Ontario,
mental Protection Agency Report.
                                                   I and II.  U.S. Environ-
Thomas,  R.L.,  A.L.W.  Kemp, and C.F.M. Lewis.
    tion and characteristics of the surficial
    Sed. Petrol.  42.
                                          1972.  Distribution composi-
                                          sediments of Lake Ontario.  J.
Thomas, R.L.,  J.M.  Jaquet, A.L.W. Kemp, and C.F.M. Lewis.
    sediments  of Lake Erie.  J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 33.
                                                       1976.  Surficial
                                     305

-------
                                 SECTION 16

      SELF-ORGANIZATION OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELS OF WATER POLLUTION

                     A.6. Ivakhnenko and G.I. Krotov^
SYNTHESIS OF MATHEMATICAL MODELS USING THE METHOD OF SELF-ORGANIZATION ON A
DIGITAL COMPUTER

    Mathematics enhances the deductive approach to the solution of problems.
The construction of each solution is based on processing of an a priori
fixed system of input axioms and initial data.  The basic shortcoming of the
deductive method is the need for a priori production of sufficiently com-
plete and accurate information on the object.  Imprecise knowledge of even a
single characteristic can make the result of modeling incorrect (e.g., an
output quantity may increase when it should decrease, etc.).  Furthermore,
the problem of the unique and optimal structure of the model  is not solved.
A variety of reliable models may be composed for one and the  same object.
In practice, this means:  The number of models will be equal  to the number
of modeling attempts, i.e., each model is a unique invention  of its author.

    According to the theorem of incompleteness of Godel, the  so-called in-
ternal criteria, utilized by deductive mathematics, are not suitable for se-
lection of the structure of a model of optimal complexity.  Any internal
criterion leads to the false rule:  "The more complex the model, the more
precise it is."  An example of an internal criterion might be the mean-
square error calculated for all points of experimental data as well as cer-
tain other statistical criteria, including significance, elasticity, and the
like (Ivakhnenko 1978).

    In contrast, external criteria pass through a minimum as  the model be-
comes increasingly complex, and this minimum defines a model  of optimal com-
plexity.  The new inductive method of modeling--self-organization of models
by computer—is directed toward comprehensively decreasing the volume of £
priori information required for modeling.

    The experimental points assigned in the table of initial  data contain
information on quite a variety of factors.  For example, in modeling bodies
of water, extremely complex processes of self-purification of the water and
transformation of matter (which are still unclear) are reflected in the ex-
perimental data.  This means that the mathematical model of such phenomena
          Academy of Sciences, 252207 Kiev, USSR.


                                     306

-------
can be found by trail and error, without deep knowledge of the mechanism of
self-purification and transformation.

    In contrast to deductive mathematics, methods of self-organization are
based on the use of external criteria:  a) regularity, b) minimum bias, c)
balance of variables, d) convergence of a multi-step prediction and e) com-
bined criteria.  It is the use of external criteria which enables a unique
model of optimal complexity, corresponding to the minimum of the selection
criterion to be obtained (Figure 1).  The internal criteria play a secondary
role in this case.  They are used for ranking of models in a sequence for
successive testing on the basis of an external criterion.

    The principle of self-organization can be formulated as follows:  With
gradual complication of models, certain criteria (which have the property of
"external supplementation") pass through a minimum.  The computer, by run-
ning through the models, finds this minimum and, consequently, indicates the
unique model of optimal complexity.


SELECTION CRITERIA

    According to Godel's theorem of incompleteness, the task of identifica-
tion of the structure and parameters of a model is not properly stated:
Only with some external supplementation can a unique solution be achieved.
In all works on modeling in which, by one means or another, a unique model
has been achieved, certain supplementary external information has been used.
The basic shortcoming of contemporary modeling is that the external, supple-
mentary information selected is not adequate for the task at hand.  The fol-
lowing criteria can be selected as expedient supplements for the theory of
self-organization of models:

    1.  The criterion of regularity:  The mean square error calculated
        at new points is not used to produce estimates of the coeffi-
        cients of the model:

                NB

                 *  (qtabi,i -V2
         A(B) = 1-!	 +min                               (1)
                 B
                 E  qtabl,i
                i=l
         where:
                 NB is the number of points of an individual test sequence
                    of data;
                 Qtabl are the tabular values of the output variable;
                 q are values calculated using the model.
                                     307

-------
OJ
o
CO
a:
LLI
H
DC
o
                   Selection of structure by

                       external criterion
                                                Selection of structure by

                                                    mixed criterion
                                                                     AU)
                    COMPLEXITY OF  MODEL STRUCTURE (S)
      Figure 1.  Characteristic curves of change of external, mixed and internal criterion with increasing
                  complexity of model structure (No. of terms and power of polynomial).

-------
   2.   The  minimum bias criterion:  Requires maximum agreement of the
       values of the output quantity of two models obtained using two
       different parts of the table of initial data NA and NB:

              a(NA+NB)              2



        ncn =   1=1 NA+ND '	— " min                            (2)
                     \    2
                   a 1^1  qtabl,i


       where qA and qe are the values of the output quantity cal-
       culated for all (NA - NB) points using the data of the
       model obtained in parts of the sample NA and NB, respec-
       tively; NA and No are, e.g., points with even and odd ordi-
       nal  indexes'.  If the input data contain noise, it is re-
       commended that the summation interval be increased:  Coef-
       ficient a should be selected proportional to the intensity
       of the noise.  It is taken within the limits a = 1.5 -^ 3.0.

   3.   Criterion of balance of variables:  Used for simultaneous
       long-term prediction of several variables.  Frequently, a
       certain interrelationship of variables is known a priori,
       and  the criterion requires that this relationship be ful-
       filled for the future over the extrapolation interval.

   Let us assume that it is known that q = f(x], X£, X3).

   Then the balance equation is q - f(x,, X2> x3) = 0.

   The criterion of balance of variables
    following criterion is more resistant to interference
              aN
              .Zn  (qA,i ' qAB,i)(qB,i
                    «    qtabl,i
where q^,  qg,  q/\+g are the value of the output quantity calculated using
the model  after training on sample N/\, NB and N/\ and NB together.
Ivakhnenko et  aK  (1978) compare the interference stability of various
versions  of the minimum bias criterion.
                                    309

-------
         b =
     N2
     E     [q. -
    •j=|\|"|     '
                                    3  .
                                  I , O, I
                       U2
                                   rrnn,
                                                                (3)
                      i=Nl
         where:  N-| = Ty - At, N2 = Ty + At

and (NI - N2) is the time interval, which includes the prediction point.
The criterion of balance of variables frequently leads to ambiguous selec-
tion of several models; in order to assure unambiguity of selection, it is
used in combination with other criteria.

    In problems in which the balance of variables is unknown, it is "dis-
covered" in advance by the use of the minimum bias criterion.  In recent
studies, combined selection criteria have been widely used, combinations of
the individual criteria just described.  The reason is that the selection of
a criterion depends on the purpose of solution of the problem and should be
entirely the privilege of the person who is designing the model.  Usually,
the motivation of statement of the modeling task is in itself not completely
clear and precise.  This leads to equal uncertainty in the recommendations
for selection of combined criteria.  Still, the following rules can be
formulated:
    1.  For models used for short-term prediction, the combined cri-
        terion "no bias plus balance of variables" is recommended:
K, =
                               mm;
                                                                (4)
        For models
        criterion '
          intended for long-term prediction, the combined
          no bias plus balance of variables" is recommended:
K2 =
                           mm;
                                                                (5)
        For differential (finite difference) models, in which long-
        term prediction is obtained by means of step-by-step inte-
        gration, the combined criterion "no bias plus convergence of
        the procedure of prediction" is recommended:
                     i2(N)
                      mm,
                                                               (6)
where:  i'
                            i - qtabl,i)

                              qtabl,i
                                     310

-------
is the sum of the squares of deviations of the curve of the process from the
curve of a repeated (multi-step) prediction, begun from the first point of
the interpolation interval.  N is the number of points in the table of  ini-
tial  data.  The criterion of the minimum bias participates in all combined
criteria, since bias is to be avoided in modeling.

    Combined criteria not only provide a stable and unique prediction,  but
also  make its selection "sharper".  Individual criteria frequently do not
provide a sufficiently sharp minimum.

    Desiring to satisfy a number of requirements, other types of combined
criteria may be used, containing two or three particular requirements.  For
example:
         K  = Vn+
       2
4 ~ V "srn •  u   •  > v;  ' »"" .                                  /j\
All of the component criteria should be reduced to the dimensionless form
with range of change from 0 to 1.  This requirement is not obligatory if the
criteria are applied sequentially for selection of the model.


THE PROBLEM OF MODELING OF PHYSICAL FIELDS ON THE BASIS OF EXPERIMENTAL DATA

    Modeling of physical fields has as its purpose identification  (construc-
tion) of a picture of the field, and estimation of its parameters.  Mathema-
tical models of the field are necessary for prediction of its subsequent
development, extrapolation to neighboring areas, and for synthesis of the
optimal control rule for the field.  An example of a physical field to be
modeled might be the field of pollution in a body of water.  This  example  is
used below to explain some very general methods of field modeling.

    The number of control stations recording water pollution increases from
year to year.  Nevertheless, there is not yet available sufficiently precise
data with a small number of measurements.  This virtually eliminates the
possibility of using probabilistic models based on the construction of
multidimensional distributions.  The possibility of modeling is related to
the use of inductive methods of self-organization of models by computer, '
based on running a large number of models (in the form of finite-difference
equations) on a computer.  Actually, this method requires a relatively small
number of points of measurement, and when the proper external selection cri-
terion is used, it has significant interference resistance.

    Obviously, a description of methods applicable to the problem  is neces-
sary to clarify the conduct of subsequent measurements.  Thus, the peculi-
arities of measurement determine the selection of modeling methods, while
the development of methods makes certain corrections to the process of in-
formation collection.

    A field of pollution is constructed using the data from observations of
control stations, and data on the location, intensity, and time of discharge
of pollutant substances.  The selection of the output quantity and the argu-

                                     311

-------
ments defines the "statement of the task of modeling".   This  depends on the
purpose of modeling (interpolation, extrapolation,  or prediction),  and upon
the availability of initial information to be used  to synthesize the model.

    In this work, algorithms are presented for the  solution of  three prob-
lems of modeling of the field of a pollutant.  In the following, statements
are 1) based on the data collected at control stations;  2) based on  in-
formation on the discharge of pollutants, and 3) based on the two types of
data, taken together.

    In the first problem, the equation of turbulent diffusion (in its
finite-difference form) is not assigned a_ priori, but rather  is  found  from
the experimental data on the principle of self-organization,  by  processing
standard samples and their nonlinearity.  The number of  terms in the com-
plete equation is usally significantly greater than the  number  of experi-
mental data points.  Estimates of the coefficients  are found  by  the  least-
squares method.  The solution is found by a multi-step integration process
of the finite difference equation.  It is not necessary  to know  its  solution
in analytic form.

    In the second problem, the arguments of the finite-difference model  are
selected so that the form of the equation corresponds to the  "input-output
matrix" (Tamura and Kando 1977; Yurachkovskiy 1977).  It is possible to  re-
fer to the area of interpolation as a portion of a  space lying within  a
polyhedron, the points of which are the outer control stations.   The area of
extrapolation lies outside this three-dimensional polyhedron  (Figure 2).  In
prediction, the area of interpolation lies within the time interval  of the
experimental data.  The area of prediction lies in  the future, outside the
area of interpolation of the process.

    One characteristic feature of the area of interpolation is that, accord-
ing to the Weierstrass theorem, any curve described by a sufficiently  com-
plex function fits the experimental points rather well.  Only in the area of
extrapolation and prediction do the curves diverge  rapidly, forming  a  "fan"
of predictions.  The model should correspond to the function  (or solution of
the differential equation) which corresponds to the future course of the
process in the area of extrapolation or prediction  longer than the others.

    Depending on the principle of selection of arguments, three  different
tasks can be distinguished.  The first is based on  the "principle of con-
tinuity or near action"; the second on the opposite "principle of distant
action"; the third task is combined, using both principles simultaneously.

    The model may be a point, one-dimensional, two-dimensional,  three-dimen-
sional, multidimensional, algebraic harmonic or finite-difference (differen-
tial).  If the model is constructed according to observed data  in which  the
spatial distribution of the sensors (or control stations) is  not indicated,
it is called a point model, hence there is reason to act as if  all data were
collected at one point in space.

    The model is called spatial or a field model if the  initial  data in-
clude information on the location of the measurement stations in space.

                                     312

-------
oo

CO




'*
1



-2,0
*





X
X
-1,0



X
X
0.+,
0,0
0,-1

&




1
+1,0
1








\
\

—




\
\
\





\





V X
3

             Figure 2.  Use of simple models for extrapolation of the area of pollution between three
                          measurement stations 1, 2 and 3 in the direction of the x axis.

-------
Spatial models require at least three stations on  each  axis.   Models  with
one argument are called one-dimensional, while models with  several  arguments
are called multi-dimensional.

    The same table of experimental data can be used  to  construct  both the
algebraic (or harmonic) model, e.g.,

         q = f(t),                                                       (8)

and the finite-difference model, e.g.,


                     q-l» q-2' ••" q-T)'


The difference is only in the order of reading the data of  the  table.  When
methods of self-organization of models are used, preference must  be given to
the construction of finite-difference models, which  are analogs of differen-
tial equations.  The problem is that in problems of  mathematical  physics,
linear differential equations correspond to nonlinear solutions.  In  pro-
cessing models, it is easier to "guess" the linear nature of  a  finite-dif-
ference equation than the nonlinearity of its solution, which  reduces  the
time required to process the reference functions.  Furthermore, the solution
of the finite-difference equation is more varied than the variation of
curves corresponding to the same algebraic function.  Therefore,  further
analysis will consider exclusively finite-difference models.

    The symbols for the model arguments may be either the instantaneous
values of the coordinates t, x, y and z. or the values  of measurements of
control stations q(i)  and discharges Av~0  (instantaneous  and  delayed argu-
ments), where:    J(T)                 .]'(T)

    i is the control station number;
    j is the number of the pollutant;
    T is the delay in measurement of the argument  in question.
                (1)
    Examples:  ^2(-3) ""s the discharge of the second polluting  com-
               ponent of the first source, measured  only a  delay  of
               3 time cycles;
                (2)
               ql(0) is the measurement of the first pollutant  at the
               second station in the current moment  of time.

If there is no subscript, this means that only one pollutant  is being  con-
sidered.
FIRST TASK:  MODELING OF A FIELD USING FINITE-DIFFERENCE ANALOGS  OF  THE
EQUATIONS OF TURBULENT DIFFUSION, BASED ON THE PRINCIPLE OF  CLOSE ACTION

    The equations of turbulent diffusion are based on the  principle  of con-
tinuity or close effect of neighboring particles, forming  a  physical  field.
The elementary model in the theory of finite-difference equations refers  to

                                     314

-------
a geometric figure showing just which neighboring points of the field  are
used for construction of the equation structure.  Changes in two neighboring
cells (cubes) of the field are sufficient to represent the first derivative
(on the axis of placement of the cells), while three cells are sufficient
for the analog of the second derivative (Ivakhnenko and Krotov 1977).

   ^Examples of the interrelations of linear differential equations, their
finite-difference analogs, and elementary models are shown in Figures  3 and
4.

    For physical fields, certain deterministic field models are usually
known, mathematically expressed in the form of differential or integral-dif-
ferential equations.  These equations of the deterministic theory can  be
used as predictors for selection of the form of the following:  a) argu-
ments, and b) functions participating in the full description of the model
(combined method).  The deterministic equation of diffusion indicates  a cer-
tain model which should be used as the basis of selection.  The full model
is produced from the model corresponding to the deterministic equation of
diffusion by incrementing its dimensions by one or two cells on each axis.
This means that, in any case, the order of the equation is increased by one
(or two) in order to allow the algorithm to select a more general rule.

    In modeling, two basic types of modeling algorithms are used:

    a)  a combinatorial algorithm which equates the various coeffi-
        cients of the full polynomial to zero in turn, or

    b)  a multiple-row (threshold) algorithm.


SELECTION OF MODELS AND DEGREE OF NONLINEARITY (DOUBLE SELECTION)

    When the number of components of the full polynomial is less than  20,
the combinatorial algorithm is used to select the model of optimal com-
plexity (setting all possible combinations of terms of the full polynomial
equal to zero), requiring that all possible partial polynomials be con-
sidered.  In this case, it is sufficient to analyze only the one, most com-
plete, clearly sufficient model, the power of which is equal to the number
of arguments; selection of models is therefore not required.  When the num-
ber of components of the full polynomial is greater than 20, the multi-row
(threshold) modeling algorithm is used.  Testing of certain partial poly-
nomials may be omitted in this case.

    In order to expand the selection, one should use:

    a)  processing of particular models (composition of arguments), be-
        ginning with the simplest two-cell model (Figure 3);

    b)  processing of all possible polynomials for each of the simple  models
        using the multiple-row modeling algorithm with renaming of vari-
        ables, ending with a polynomial in which the highest power is  equal
        to the number of arguments indicated in the simple model in question.

                                    315

-------
                                                       FIELD OF INTERPOLATED DIGITAL DATA
    n>
    CO
  r+ 73
  3" C
  (D 3

 "O <-+•
  -s ~=s-
  rr> -s
  Q. O
  — i. c
  n ta









-2,0



-1,0


0, -1
0,0
0,+ )


no



-»















      Simple models
Data tables
Gradual complication of model and analysis
  o o
  33
    O
 .a a.
 4-  (D
    o>
 ci- -S
 +  O
 — '  Q.
    c
 o  o
 ••  rt-
 X  -••
 +  o
 — '  =5
W
 O  O
 ••  -h
 J3
 _1.  Q.
C-i.  Q)
    OJ
    CT
    (D
    a
    -5
0,0
+ 1,0
                   0.-1
   0,0
        + 1,0
-1,0
      0,0
                              0.-1
              0,0
                   + 1,0



-2,0

-1,0



0,0
0,+1

+1,0

1+lfl

^0,0

"+1,0

^0,0

"o,+i

Vi

^+1,0

\0

^0,+1

V.

^-1.0

9+,,o

^0,0

9o.+i

90,-i

9-1,0

9-2,0

                                                                 dq
                                                                -?- + atq =  f(tx)
                                                                 at
                                                                — + a\—
                                                                                             ' 9o,+p 90,-i. 9_,

-------
                                         FIELD OF INTERPOLATED DIGITAL DATA
                                                        -1.-2
                                                                   +1,0
           Simple models
Data tables
         Gradual complication of model and analysis
co
                  +1,0
         -2,-3
                      +1,0
             -1.-2
                        +1,0
9+1,0

V-i

 dq
-
 dt
                                                                     dq
       dx


9+1,0 = /I ('+1,0'
       a2?
                                   = f(tx)



                                     > +
                                                              dt
                                  a
-------
    This double processing of simple models  and  nonlinear  polynomials pro-
vides a more complete examination of the set of  possible partial  polynomials
in problems in which, due to the great number  of arguments,  it is impossible
to use the simpler combinatorial modeling algorithm.

    Double selection produces three types of tables of  data.   It  is  neces-
sary to distinguish the table of initial data  from the  testing stations,  the
table of interpolated initial data, and the  table of  simple  models,  obtained
as a result of shifting of the simple models over the digital  field  of  the
table (Figures 3 and 4).  Each position of a simple model  on  the  number
field of interpolated data corresponds to one  row (point)  on  the  table.   The
points are ranked according to the dispersion  of the  output  value (in the
left part of the equation), and are used to  determine the  selection  crite-
rion.  To do this, the row of simple model tables is  divided  into parts A
and B.

    The division into parts is performed not on  the initial  digital  field of
data, but rather on the tables obtained in the course of shifting the
simple models over the field.  For each simple model, a unique table of ex-
perimental data is produced.  There will be  as many tables as  there  are
simple models which are compared against each  other.  The  simple  model  which
provides the greatest depth of the minimum of  the combined criteria  is  best.


THE CONVERGENCE OF MULTI-STEP INTEGRATION OF FINITE-DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS

    The convergence of integration may be defined as follows:   Each  finite-
difference equation is a discrete analog of  a  certain differential equation
with continuous derivatives.  If the curve obtained as a result of step-by-
step integration of the finite difference equation coincides  closely enough
with the curve of the analytic solution of the differential equation (or
with a decrease in the discretization step—coincides with it  precisely),
the procedure for step-by-step integration converges.   If  there is no con-
vergence, the step-by-step solution frequently becomes  infinite or falls  to
zero.

    Convergence depends on:  a) the degree of  bias of the  estimates  of  the
coefficients obtained by the least-squares method; b) the  relationship  of
discretization steps of the axes; c) the form  of the simple model; and  d)
the accumulation of computational errors (e.g.,  in calculation with  a small
number of significant digits).  It is recommended that the discretization
step be decreased until the accuracy of the model increases  noticeably.   If
the steps are too small, the accuracy decreases  once more.

    It is known that simple models with a small  number of  points  are more
stable than branched simple models.  Ivakhnenko  and Krotov (1977) have  sug-
gested that the simple models be used with an  "implicit" plan  of  step-by-
step integration, as a method of increasing  convergence.

    All partial simple models and the full simple model are  evaluated on  the
basis of the combined criterion "bias plus error of step-by-step  integra-
tion":

                                    318

-------
                 sm mm
                             'HNL^
where
          is  the index of bias:
                "A+B
                     (qA -
          sm
                                             , where a =  1.5 •=• 3.0,
                       a ]   qtabl
while i(N)  is the index of stability of integration:
                N
         KM) =
                 A+B
                 Z   (q
                 1
                       tabl
                        N
                         A+B
                         Z
                         1
The component of the combined criterion n   assures selection of an equation
with minimum bias.  Component i(N) is directed toward selection of a stable
step-by-step procedure for construction of predictions and extrapolations.
Frequently, the requirements nsm •* min and i -> min are not contradictory,
i.e., they lead to the selection of the same model.  If there is divergence,
a compromise solution must be found (Figure 5).  The use of modeling algo-
rithms does not require a priori knowledge of whether there is an algebraic
solution of the differential (finite-difference) equation.  Neither is  it
necessary to know the explicit algebraic form of this solution.  The study
is conducted at the level of the differential equation, and does not reach
the level of its solution.
SUCCESSIVE APPLICATION OF CRITERIA WITH DOUBLE SELECTION

    It has been experimentally established that models obtained for  a  given
composition of arguments, i.e., for one simple model, differ  comparatively
little in the minimum value of the criterion of regularity  and differ  quite
sharply in terms of the minimum criterion of the minimum  bias.  Geometri-
cally, this is expressed in that points corresponding to  the  models  compared
form lines on a plane, similar to spectrograms.  The criteria which  should
be used for selection of simple models are:  regularity,  stability of
balance of variables:

         A(B) -^ min, i(N) -»- min, B -> min,

                                     319

-------
o
cc
in
H
CC
o
DO


D
              I  o
             I
             I
             I    o
             I
             I  o
        \    s
                                                           \
                       I     I
 Figure
            Selection of a model  of optimal  complexity based on the combined
                    criterion
                               Kl -

+ i'
i'2(N)
                                                    min.
             0 = models with same composition of mean arguments.
                                     320

-------
while for selection of nonlinearity of the polynomials, the  criterion  of
minimum bias should be used:

         nsm + min.

This recommendation leads to a reduction in program  length,  and to more ac-
curate discrimination of models.

    The examples show that successive application of criteria  is not com-
pletely equivalent to the application of a combined criterion  in all selec-
tion sequences.  It yields somewhat simpler models with less variety of
arguments.

Example 1.  Double Selection of Point Models

    For a point problem with one variable q, selection of simple models is
equivalent to selection of the number of delaying arguments  considered:
                                                   n
First simple model:   q+i = f(qg) = ag + a-jq0 + a2qQ,
                                                               2       2
Second simple model:  q+1 = f(qo>q_i) = ag + al% + a2cl-l +  a3qo + a4q-l +

                          + a5qOq-l>

Third simple model:   q+] - f(q0,q_-|,q_2) = ao + alqO + a2q-l  + a3q-2
                                      ?l + V-2 + a7qOq-l + a8V-2 +
                            a9q_lcl_2-
    Selection of non linearities in this example refers to selection of par-
tial polynomials produced from the full polynomials using a combinational
algorithm, i.e., by setting various combinations of coefficients equal to
2 , where n is the index of the last coefficient (n = 0, 5, 9,  . ..).  As
soon as the number of components of the full polynomial exceeds  20, multi-
ple-row modeling algorithms must be used.

    For a point model with two variables q and x, we have:

First simple model:   q+-| = f(qQ,XQ),

Second simple model:  q+, = f (qo'xn'q-Vx-l^s

Third simple model:   q+1 = f (q0,x0,q_-|,x_-|,q_2,x_2),  ... etc.

    Here, the transition to a multiple row algorithm occurs more rapidly,
since the number of terms of the full polynomials is significantly greater.
Otherwise, the processing of simple models and nonlinearities  have the same
form.
                                      321

-------
Example 2.  Double Processing for Three-Dimensional  Models

    Using the principle of continuity  (or similar  action) for  spatial
models, several equations are composed  (based on the number  of coordinates
of time and space).  Furthermore, the  number of arguments includes  variables
with different time delays and shifts  in space.  A two-dimensional  spatial
model is analyzed in detail in the following example.


BASIC STATEMENTS OF THE TASK OF MODELING (SELECTION  OF ARGUMENTS)

First Task:  Modeling of the Field of  a Pollutant  Exclusively  on the Basis
of Data Provided by a Few Measurement  Stations

    The first statement of the task of modeling of a field has  as its pur-
pose the construction of the field of  a pollutant, not only  in  the  area of
interpolation (encompassed by the measurement stations), but also over a
significant distance outside this area, i.e., construction of  an extrapola-
tion of the field and prediction of its development  in time.   It is assumed
here that the emission of the pollutant changes relatively little with time
and, therefore, information on the pollutant is not  directly considered.  It
is contained indirectly in the data of the measurement stations.  Therefore,
in the first statement, the set of arguments contains only the  data of the
measurement stations.  If there are few stations, the data can  be inter-
polated within the area of interpolation in order  to  produce the mean values
of the pollution index in all squares  of the field t-x.  Two-stage  inter-
polation (Ivakhnenko and Krotov 1977)  implies that first the data of the
stations are interpolated (between stations) by the  least-squares method.
The "digital field" thus produced is used to synthesize finite-difference
models suitable for prediction and extrapolation outside the area of inter-
polation.

    For brevity of presentation of the overall method, the equations are
shown below for the two-dimensional model, q = f(xt), only.  It is easy, by
analogy, to compose similar equations  for the three-dimensional (or four-
dimensional) field, q = f(x,y,z,t), as well.

    The equation for the parameters of pollution with simple model 5 (Figure
3) can be written in vector form as follows:

    a) for prediction;


          0) = "jnp [qK(0,0)'qK(0,-l)'qK(0,+l)'qK(-l,0)'qK(-2,0)'"-'qK(-T,0)]
                                                                         (15)


    b) for extrapolation:


                    tqK(0,0)'qK(-l,0)'qK(+l,0)'qK(0,-l)'qK(0,-2)"'"qK(0,-T)]



                                     322

-------
where otj is the vector of polynomial functions  (linear, nonlinear without
covariation or with incomplete consideration of covariation) of dimensiona-
lity j.

    In all  of the equations presented, the vector of measured external vari
able contained in the right portion can contain both the variables them-
selves,  their delaying values, and covariations (in pairs), which can be
considered  individual variables, e.g.,

    qi(o)q2(o) ••• qi(-


    In the  equations presented below, the covariation vector will not be
shown for simplicity.

    q  and  q  are vectors of the parameters of pollution with dimensionality
j, k = 1, 2, 3, . ..  For example, to predict and extrapolate the first com-
ponent of pollution, considering equations (la) where j = 2, k = 2, T = 2,
we obtain:

    a) for  prediction


                lnp [ql

               q2(0,-l)»q2(0,+l)'q2(-l,0)'q2(-2,0)]                    (15a)

    b) for  extrapolation


    ql(0,+l) = a!3K [ql
             = a
               q2(-l,0)'q2(+l,0)'q2(0,-l)'q2(0,-2)]


The "Source-Functions" in the First Task (Consideration of Settling of
Pollutant Particles and Lateral Influx of Pollutant, as well as ExteTnal In
fluences of the Environment

    In the two-dimensional problem analyzed above, we did not consider the
process of diffusion of a pollutant from layer to layer, and vertical set-
tling of particles.  In order to consider these phenomena, the "source func
tion" or "residue" is introduced, a function of the coordinates of the
square in which the output quantity is measured.  Furthermore, the source
function also includes the perturbing effects P of the wind, V of current
on the x axis, etc.

    For the parameters of the pollutant, in the general statement, we ob-
tain:
                                    323

-------
    the prediction equation
             + ajnp  [qK(0,0)'qK(0,-l)'qK(0,+l)»qK(-2,0)'qK(-l,0) ..... qK(-T,0)]

                                                                         (16)
and the extrapolation equation
             + aj3K [\(0,0)>qK(-l,0)>qK(0,-l)'qK(0,-2)'-'-'qK(0,-T)]


Simultaneous step-by-step integration of Equations  (16,  16a)  enables the
generation of a prediction (on the t axis) or an extrapolation  (on  the  x
axis) of the field of the pollutant.

Second Task:  Modeling of Fields Using Finite-Difference  Equations  Corre-
sponding to the Expanded "Input-Output" Matrix  (Based on  the  Principle  of
Long-Range Action)"

    In addition to the analogs of the equations of  turbulent  diffusion, the
modeling of physical fields also involves equations corresponding to the
functional "input-output" matrix (second task).  Performance  of  the second
task of field modeling is easy if a prediction of changes  in  the field  of
the pollutant within the area of interpolation  is required when  there  is a
change in the discharge with time.  The solution of the second problem  does
not provide an accurate extrapolation of the field  far beyond the limits of
the area.

    The second task has three statements:

    1.  Modeling by "input-output" matrix, using information  of  measurement
        stations alone:

    In the first statement, the following prediction equation is used for
the i'th station:

              m
             sjH
where  qs = Eq,q^M },q*(_T) ,. . •
                                     324

-------
       qs  are the parameters of the pollutant;
       a is  the operator of the polynomial functions;
       m is  the number of stations.

For example, where j = 2, T = 2, m = 3n (n is the number of components),
           - a   ra(2)  _(2)    (2)    (2)   (2)    (2)
           " a21  Lql(0)'ql(-l)'ql(-2)'q2(0)'q2(-l)'q2(-2)J +
                 ra(3)  a(3)  _(3)   .(3)   _(3)   (3)  ,
              31  Iql(0)'ql(-l)q2(-2)>ql(-2)>q2(0),q2(-l)]              (17a)
The pollution at the itn station (or point of the field) depends directly on
the value of the indexes measured from the closest neighboring stations,
with various time delays.

    2.   Modeling by "input-output" matrix, using information on discharge of
        pollutants only:

    In  its second statement for the i^h station, the prediction equation is
as follows:
where:   q are the pollution parameters,
        X is the discharge vector,

        >s _ r,s    ,s     ,s           ,s    ,s     ,s    ,
           " L  l(0)'"l(-l)>;vl(-T)' •"' An(0)'xn(-l)'xn(-T)]>

        BSJ  is  the operator of the polynomial functions,
        p is the number of sources.

For example, where n = 2, T = 2 and p = 2, we obtain
                   (2)    (2)    (2)    (2)   (2)    (2)
                                                                       (18a)
    3.   Modeling considering information on measurement stations and infor-
        mation on the discharge of sources of pollution:

    In  the general (third) statement of the task, the "input-output" matrix
is expanded by introducing the data from the measurement of nearby stations
in addition to the discharges of pollution sources.
                                     325

-------
     In its general statement, the  prediction  equation  for the i^ station
is:
The "Source Function" in the Second Task  (Consideration  of  External  Ef-
fects)

    In order to consider external effects  (the  adjusted  wind  or  current,
temperatue, relative humidity and other physical quantities),  it  is  recom-
mended that Equations (17) and  (18) or (19) be  supplemented with  the follow-
ing source function in the right part:

    Q(V, P, ...).

As a result, we produce complete descriptions,  in the form  of  sums of poly-
nomials:

    First statement:

     ( i )                     P       c
    qj(+1) - Q^V'.P,...) +  z   3SJUS);                                (20)
    Second statement:
                             m       <;
                             £  asj(q );                                (20a)
or in the general (third) statement:

     (i)
The particular polynomials are produced as versions by setting various terms
of these full descriptions equal to zero.

    The additive introduction of "source functions" to the full equation was
shown earlier.  Physical fields are encountered in which this function is
included multiplicatively or is mixed.
For example,


                              m       c     P
qr+n = (UV'.P) + Q?(V',P) ( Z  a  (qs) +  z  R.
 1  U    '           *        5=1  SJ       S=l  SJ
                                                                        (20b)
                                    326

-------
It is  necessary to select a multiplicative or mixed version of application
of the function depending on which will provide the deepest minimum of the
criterion  of selection, or on the basis of a priori information.

Third  Task:   Modeling of Fields with Simultaneous Application of the Princi-
ples of "Near" and "Distant" ActTon

    The third task has three statements:

    1.  Modeling using the principle of "near" action and the "input-
        output" matrix, considering information from the measurement
        stations.   In this statement, a combination of the first two
        problems is used.

    2.  Modeling using the principle of "near" action and the "input-
        output" matrix, considering information on discharges, a com-
        bination of the first two tasks.

    3.  Modeling using the principle of "near" action and the expanded
        "input-output" matrix, considering both data from the measure-
        ment stations and the discharges of pollutants.

Examples of  Solution of Two-Dimensional Problem with Fixed Number and Posi-
tion of Measurement Stations

    Three  variables were measured at three points in a body of water at the
depth  of 0.5 m:  dissolved oxygen pk = q(t), biochemical oxygen demand BOD =
q(t) and temperature x(t).  The measurements were performed from mid-May,
every  two  weeks, for a total of 8 times.  The results are cited elsewhere
(Ivakhnenko  and Krotov 1977).

    Two-stage interpolation:

    Using  quadratic interpolation, the number of measurement points was
greatly increased  from 3 x 8 = 24 to 16 x 16 = 256 (Ivakhnenko and Krotov
1977).  The  permissibility of this approach is based on the fact that the
smooth functions are well approximated within the area of interpolation.
However, for extrapolation (on the x axis) and prediction (on the t axis),
it is  necessary to use finite-difference equations derived from the modeling
algorithm.

    When the combined criterion k] is used as the external criterion, the
following  types of interpolating polynomials are produced:


    q+1.Q  =  8.109  - 0.136x + 0.033T + 0.06U - 8'10~5xT +


          +  6.54-10~3x2 - 8-10~5t2;


    K3min  =  °'8728' A(B)min = °-6500'


                                     327

-------
    Z+1 = - 13.017 + 1.725T + O.OUt + 1.8»10~7xt - 1.3-10"4x2 -


          - 0.056T2 - 5.6«10~4t2;


    K3min = °-985> A^B^min = Ot362;


The task of prediction is performed by identification of the finite-differ-
ence equation


    q+i,o = f^xo,+i'to,+i'qo,o'q-i,o'q-2,o'qo,-i'qo,+r


            Z0,0'Z-l,0'Z-2,0'Z0,-l>Z0,+l) '


In order to produce the table of initial data, simple model No. 5 (Figure 3)
is moved step-by-step over the digital field of the table derived from
quadratic interpolation in direction t.  The task of extrapolation is per-
formed by means of identification of an equation such as


    Z0,+l = f(x+l,0't+l,0'Z0,0'Z0,-l,Z0,-2'Z+l,0'Z-l,0'


            qO,0'qO,-l'qO,-2'q+l,0'q-l,0T) '


To produce the data table, the simple model was shifted in the direction of
the x axis, using the combined criterion:
            o     o
           ncm + A (c) '


    A(c)—the error for an individual examination sequence.  The following
equations were obtained for extrapolation.


    qO,+l = 9'524 + °'094 Z0,0Z0,-2 + °-003 Z0,0T0,0 + °-230 Z0,-lZ0,-2


          - °'140 Z0,-1Z+1,0 * °'027 Z0,-2 + °'039 Z0,-2 q-l,0


          - °'140 Z0,-2Z0,-1 -°-029Z-l,0-°-105Z-l,0Z+l,0'
                                                       = 0.38.
          = - 0.18 + 1.157 Z    - 0.112 Z    + 0.01
                                     328

-------
           A(c) = 4.586-10'4; A(B)min = 0.05.
for prediction:
    q+M = 12.431 - 4.648 Z^ + 0.162 q_2f0Z^0 + 0.840
          - °-003 zo,oz+i,o +         -,

            K    = 1-182-10-3; n   = 2.025 '10'4;
             mn
            A(c) = 1.165-10"3; A(B)min = 0.037.
          = 1.115 + 0.020 ZT    + 0.004
            A(B) = 0.064; A(c) = 0.937-10"3.


EXAMPLE OF COMPARISON OF MODELS ON THE TEST PROBLEM OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE
FIELD OF A POLLUTANT IN A BODY OF WATER

    The method of using test problems to compare models requires that the
field is calculated using a known, deterministic formula.  The form of dif-
ferential equation used to produce the formula determines the type of re-
ference function used in the modeling algorithm.

    In the present example, the field was calculated by a formula suggested
by Lapshin which presumes pure diffusion of particles in space.  It allows
the change in pollution in space and time to be determined when there is no
current:


        2r   °°    P~X
    < = £   ' R  f   dx
           x = Rt

where   k is the coefficient of turbulent diffusion,
        T is the distance of the measurement station from the source of
          pollution,
        t is the time from the beginning of emission to the moment of mea-
          surement.
                                     329

-------
    Assuming there is one source, the rule of change of emission and concen-
tration of polluting substances with time is shown in Figure 6, according
to the initial data obtained from the equation.  Finite-difference models
of seven types were synthesized, and compared for accuracy of step-by-step
integration both inside and outside the interpolation area.

    As a result, the following improved models were obtaind.

First state of problem:

Model 1-1 (Figure 7)
        = 1.06020 - 0.1779 qj] ^ + 0.01673 q_Q + 0.63904
                                  («    - °-°1059
        + °-00233 *o-Q + °-00001  ^,!  - °'1027


        - 0.0894 q2    + 0.00947 q     - 0.0912 qq(
        + 0.00844 qqg    - 0.02334 q.   + °-00188
        - 0.00358 qn>0q(l| + 0,17850 ^l]^  - 0,25224 ^l]
          0.00894 qQq     - 0.02334 qoq+l  + °-00188
          0.07531 q     _ 0>0064
          K = 0.032; n   = 0.017;  A(c)  = 0.027;  i  = 0.182.
Second statement of problem:


Model II-l (Figure 8a)


    q[y  = 2.73520 + 0.00031  q    + 0.000001  q    - 0.0004


         + 0.00001 q3)  + 0.29626 q2V)  +  0.46974
                    (o\  CON             d\  /o\
         - 0.66516 qg  q0 '  + 4.86824 q^'q^  - 1.95950

                                    330

-------
   24
   20
co  16
^) 12
     8
     4
     0
       0
     0
       0
             l    I    1    I    i
          i    i
                  12
6        9
  TIME, hr
12
      I    I
         15
                                                    15
Figure 6.  Change of emission and concentration of pollutants with time.
                            331

-------
CO
GO
ro
      10 -
                       INTERPOLATION
0   1.5    3    4.5
                                      PREDICTION
                                                      \
                                 7.5   9  10.5  12   13.5   15

                              TIME, hr
                            Figure 7. Model 1-1.

-------
co
co
CO
                          INTERPOLATION
PREDICTION
                                 6   7.5   9


                                  TIME, hr

                              Figure 8a. Model II-l.

-------
         + 1.79479 q        + 1-58739 Q        - 1.41426 q_3
           1.1132 q    q_(3) + 1.513890 qV   + 9-67937
                        _
         - 0.10583 qf        + 3.44364 q_(3)2 - 0.38696 q
         - 3.87969



           K = 0.061; ncm = 0.046; A(c) = 0.040;  i  = 0.188.




Model II-2 ^Figure 8b)



      m                       ?                            ,  ,2
    q+y = 2.73090 + 0.000035 X^ - 0.000006 XQX   _ 0.00032  XQX_,


                        222
         + 0.000394 X_]X^ + 0.000548 X_?XQ - 0.000548 X_2X_-|



         - 0.000002 xj - 0.000003 X2X23 + 0.000003  ^^




           K = 0.089; ncm = 0.082; A(c) = 0.036;  i  = 0.169.




Model II-3 (Figure 8c)


     (1)                      (9}            (2}             2
    q;,  = 2.03610 - 2.18146 qV - 0.21021 qvl;  +  0.00754  X'
         + 0.10985 qg  q.g  + °«39242 qvr  + 0.00002



         - 0.10895 q02V3^ - o.oooooi



           K = 0.08; ncm = 0.054;  A(c)  = 0.059;  i  = 0.151.




Third statement of problem-:



Model III-l (Figure 9a)



    qjJ^Q = 2.62225 - 0.25160 qo^q^o  + 0.12961  qj1^2 + 0.00245


                                     334

-------
OJ
co
en
                          INTERPOLA TION
    PREDICTION
         0
                               6   7.5   9


                                 TIME, hr

                             Figure 8b. Model II-2,
10.5  12  13.5   15

-------
CO
CO
en
                       INTERPOLA TION
0   1.5
6   7.5   9

  TIME, hr
                                            10.5  12   13.5  15
                            Figure 8c.  Model II-3.

-------
CO
CO
                1.5    3    4.
     .5    9   10.5   12   13.5   15

TIME, hr
                               Figure 9a. Model III-l.

-------
            0.94186 qoQo + 0.32467 *[}}Q*[%Q - 0.13988
          + 0.01585 q         + °'98315 <-lo
-------
to
co
    CO
                        INTERPOLATION
PREDICTION
         0   1.5    3   4.5   6   7.5   9   10.5  12  13.5  15

                               TIME, hr
                            Figure 9b.  Model III-2.

-------
CO
J5»
o
                                6    7.5   9   10.5

                                 TIME, hr
12   13.5  15
                              Figure 9c. Model II1-3.

-------
- °-14929
        °-08369
                                                     °-22246
            K = 0.115; n   = 0.05; A(c) = 0.04;  i = 0.426.
                        \f\\\


    The solution of the first and third problems allows construction  of  a
picture of the field, prediction of its development with time  and extrapola-
tion of it along the spatial coordinates.

    The solution of the second problem yields the value of the parameters
of the pollutants at the points where the measurement stations are  located.
Using the data obtained, predictions can be constructed and then, by means
of interpolation, the field in an area located within a polygon may be
found, the points of which are the points of the measurement stations, i.e.,
in the interpolation area (Figure 1).

    Another version of the algorithm is also possible:  It is  possible to
first interpolate the data of the stations, and then later construct the
prediction for the points in the area of interpolation of interest.  Predic-
tions can also be produced only for the area of interpolation  by means of
step-by-step integration of the equations along the time axis.  The solu-
tion to the second problem is not suitable for extrapolation of the field
into neighboring areas.


CONCLUSIONS - COMPARISON OF MODELS

    The model using the principle of near action, 1-1, produces less accu-
rate predictions than improved models based on the principle of "distant"
action, II-3, and the combined model, III-2, if the rate of emission of the
sources of pollution change with time.  The model of "distant" action, II-3,
which considers both measured data at the measurement stations and informa-
tion on changes in the rate of pollutant discharge, is the best of all the
models.

    In the future, the authors intend to use the criterion of  balance of
variables (Tamura and Kando 1977), which should be no worse than direct mea-
surement of emission, for organization of models.
REFERENCES

Dyachenko, V.F.   1977.
    Press, Moscow.
Basic concepts in computational mathematics, Mir
Ivakhnenko, A.G. and G.I. Krotov.  1977.  Modeling of pollution of the en-
    vironment when there is no information available on the emissions of
    sources of pollution.  Avtomatika, No. 5, Kiev, Naukova dumka Press, pp.
    14-30.
                                     341

-------
Ivakhnenko, A.G.  1978.  Inductive methods of self-organization of computer-
    ized complex system models.  Avtomatika, No.4, Kiev, Naukova dumka
    Press, pp. 11-26.

Ivakhnenko, A.G., V.N. Vysotskiy and N.A. Ivakhnenko.  1978.  Basic vari-
    eties of the criterion of the minimum of displacement of a model and in-
    vestigation of their interference stability.  Avtomatika, No. 1, Kiev,
    Naukova dumka Press, pp. 32-53.

Tamura H., and T. Kando.  1977.  Large-spatial pattern identification of air
    pollution by combined model of source-receptor matrix and revised paper
    presented at IFAC Symposium of Environment System, Kyoto.

Yurachkovskiy, Yu.P.  1977.   Improvement of the MGUA modeling algorithm for
    prediction of processes  (a review).   Avtomatika, No.  5, Kiev, Naukova
    dumka Press, pp. 76-86.
                                   342

-------
                                  SECTION  17

         A SPATIALLY-SEGMENTED MULTI-CLASS  PHYTOPLANKTON MODEL FOR
                           SAGINAW BAY,  LAKE HURON

                Victor J.  Bierman,  Jr.  and  David  M.  Dolan1


 INTRODUCTION

    Saginaw Bay is a broad,  shallow extension  of  the western  shore of Lake
 Huron (Figure 1).  The bay is oriented  in a southwest^ard direction and  is
 82 km long and 42 km wide.   For  convenience, the  bay has been  divided into
 five spatial segments on the basis  of differences in observed  water quality.
 The average depth of the inner portion  of the  bay, represented by spatial
 segments one, two, and three, is  approximately 6  m.   The average  depth of
 the outer portion of the bay, represented by spatial segments  four and five,
 is approximately 15 m.  Seventy  percent of  the total water  volume is  con-
 tained in the outer portion  of the  bay  and  the remaining 30 percent is con-
 tained in the inner portion.
                                                                          P
    The total area of the  Saginaw Bay watershed is approximately  21,000  km  .
 The Saginaw River is the major tributary and it accounts for over 90  percent
 of the total tributary inflow to  the bay.   The principal  land  use categories
 in the watershed are agriculture  and forest.   The total  population of the
 watershed is slightly over  1.2 million.  Most  of  the population is concen-
 trated into four major urban-industrial centers:   Bay City, Midland,  Sagi-
 naw, and Flint.  These centers are  all  situated along the Saginaw River  or
 its major tributaries.

    The principal water uses in  Saginaw Bay include  municipal  and industrial
 water supply, waterborne transportation, recreation,  commercial fishing, and
 waste assimilation.  These  uses  are  severely impacted by the considerable
 quantities of waste discharges and  runoff to the  bay as  a result  of human
 activities in the watershed.  In  particular, the  inner portion of the bay
 suffers from highly degraded water  quality.

    The principal issue addressed  in the developement of the present  model
 was cultural eutrophication, defined as overproduction of phytoplankton  bio-
mass due to increased nutrient loadings.  The  purpose of the modeling effort
 u.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Large Lakes Research  Station,  Grosse
 lie, Michigan 48138.
                                     343

-------
      10  0  10  20  30  40  50
       I   I   I    I   I    I   I KM
         SCALE: 1:1,000,000
Figure 1.  Saginaw Bay and the spatial segmentation  scheme  used
                 for the phytoplankton model.
                              344

-------
was to develop a deterministic phytoplankton  simulation  model  that  could
describe the cause-effect connection between  external  nutrient loading and
phytoplankton growth in Saginaw Bay.  The objectives were  twofold:   first,
to gain insight into the relevant physical, chemical,  and  biological  pro-
cesses affecting phytoplankton growth;  and second,  to  use  the  model  as a
tool for comparing the future effects of various wastewater management
strategies.

    The plan of work for the study will  include a calibration  and a subse-
quent verification of the model to two  independent  sets  of field data ac-
quired on Saginaw Bay during 1974 and 1975.   The verified  model will  be used
to generate a set of predictions corresponding to expected reductions in ex-
ternal nutrient loads, principally phosphorus.  These  predictions will  be
compared to the results of a follow-up  field  survey to be  conducted in 1980
on the Lake Huron-Saginaw Bay system.


SCOPE

    The purpose of this paper is to present results of the preliminary cali-
bration phase of the phytoplankton modeling effort. Calibration results
will be presented graphically, as well  as in  terms  of  statistical tests for
goodness of fit between model output and field data.

    In addition to model calibration results, field data will  be presented
which illustrate the large gradients in  water quality  that exist among the
five spatial segments in Saginaw Bay.   These  gradients have a  strong  impact
on the model development effort because  it is difficult  to obtain a unified
set of kinetics which can describe phytoplankton dynamics  simultaneously in
all five segments.


FIELD DATA

    As part of the Upper Lakes Reference Study sponsored by the Inter-
national Joint Commission, intensive field surveys  were  conducted on  Saginaw
Bay during 1974 and  1975 (Bratzel et aj_. 1977).  These surveys involved
several different institutions, coordinated by the  Large Lakes Research Sta-
tion of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.   In  each of  the two years,
13 sampling cruises  were conducted.  In  1974, samples  were taken on a 59-
station grid at multiple depths (Figure  2).   In 1975,  samples  were  taken on
a 37-station subset  of this grid.  This  paper is restricted primarily to the
results from 1974.

    Analyses were conducted for 22 different  physical-chemical variables,
including phosphorus, nitrogen, silicon, chlorophyll,  chloride, temperature,
and Secchi depth.  Biological measurements included species identification
and number concentrations for both phytoplankton and zooplankton.   In addi-
tion, measurements were conducted for phytoplankton cell volumes and  zoo-
plankton dry weights.
                                     345

-------
    SAG IN AW BAY
  SAMPLING NETWORK
LEGEND: •  BOAT STATION

         A  WATER INTAKE
     SAG IN AW
       RIVER
        Figure 2.  Sampling station network in Saginaw Bay.
                              346

-------
    Horizontal spatial gradients for  several  principal  water  quality vari-
ables are shown in Figures  3-5.  All  data  are  presented as  the  mean  plus  or
minus one standard error.   In  general, the  five  spatial  segments  are ordered
in the following manner with respect  to  increasing  water  quality:  one,
three, two, five, and four.  The observed  gradients  range over  a  factor of
five for chloride, a factor of  six for total  phosphorus,  and  a  factor of
ten for summer chlorophyll  a_.

    Large spatial gradients in  water  quality  occur  in  Saginaw Bay primarily
because most of the external nutrient loading  is from  a single  tributary,
the Saginaw River, and because  of the predominant water circulation  pattern
in the bay.  Water circulation  tends  to  be  counterclockwise with  relatively
clean Lake Huron water flowing  into segment four, and  relatively  dirty
Saginaw River water flowing out through  segments one,  three,  and  five (Fi-
gure 2).  Segment two is relatively dirty  because of dispersion from seg-
ments one and three.  Although  segments  one and  three  possess the  poorest
water quality of the five spatial segments, these segments  together  consti-
tute less than 10 percent of the total volume  of water  in Saginaw  Bay.  The
remaining three segments contain approximately equal volumes  of water.
MODEL DESCRIPTION

    A schematic diagram of the phytoplankton model  is  shown  in  Figure  6.
The compartments represent the principal  variables  in  the model,  and the  ar-
rows represent pathways for material transport  among the compartments.  The
reader is referred to Bierman  (1976) and  Bierman et_ aj_.  (1979)  for  a de-
tailed description of model concepts and  model  equations.

    The model includes phytoplankton biomass in terms  of five functional
groups:  diatoms, greens, non-N2~fixing blue-greens, N2-fixing  blue-greens,
and "others".  The latter category  includes primarily  dinoflagellates  and
cryptomonads.  Non-N2-fixing blue-greens  consist of those species which have
an absolute requirement for dissolved combined  nitrogen.  N2-fixing blue-
greens consist of those species which have the  capability for fixing atmos-
pheric nitrogen, as well as for using dissolved combined nitrogen.  The
nutrients included in the model are phosphorus, nitrogen, and silicon.

    The principal reason for this multi-class approach  is that  there are  im-
portant physiological differences among the five groups.  Diatoms are  the
only group with a major absolute requirement for silicon.  The  N2-fixing
blue-greens are the only group which can  grow independently  of  the  supply  of
dissolved available nitrogen.  The  relative maximum growth rates  and temper-
ature optima among the groups  are such that a typical  successional  pattern
during the growing season begins in the Spring  with diatoms, progresses to
greens and "others", and finally leads to the development of blue-greens  in
late Summer and Fall.  An important characteristic  shared by all  of the
groups is an absolute requirement for phosphorus.
                                    347

-------
00
      to
      c
       fD

       OJ
  -s
  Q)
  CL

  fD
  3
  H-

  OJ

  O
  3
O -O
O O>
3 r+
O -"•
fD CU
3 —«
       n>
     O fD
     3 3
      Qi
      3
      3
      C
      CU
      O>

      fD

      OJ
      IQ
      fD

      O
      o
      -s
      Q.
      fD
LU
Q

DC
O
            ° Z
            LiJ O
            CD r-
       LJJ "-

       <^
       ^ LU
       -I O
       < 2
       D O
       Z O
                   25
                   20
                   15
                   10
               0
                                                        SAG IN AW BAY
                                                             1974
                                           SPATIAL SEGMENT

-------
CO
-p»
vo
         (D
         CD
  O)
  3
  c+

  O>
•O 3
3- O
O 3
in CQ
T3
rr co
o -a
-S O)
C ri-
w -".
  Q>
O — '
O
3 to
o a>
(U (Q
3 3
c+ a>
         OJ
         O)
         OJ
         <
         CD

         O)
         CQ
         n>
         a>
       CO
       =)
       QC
       o
       I
       Q_
D
Z
Z
<
                     70
                     60
                     50
go  40

^ <
LU CC

< z  30
OC LJJ
UJ O
                     20
             10
               0
                                                   SAG IN AW BAY

                                                       1974
                                             SPATIAL SEGMENT

-------
LO
cn
O
       to
       -s
       tt>
       cn
       -s
       o>
       a.

      o o>
      3- 3
      — ' r+
      O
       30>
       3
      -a o
      3- 3
      I (/)
      -a
O ->•
o a>
3 — '
o
n> w
3 n>
rHQ

QJ 
r+ 3
-J- rt-
O w
3
       fD
       -S

       OJ

       CD

       QJ
       U3
       a>
     li«

     3 I
     o 2 30
     ,., H
          Ji1 LU
          <^
          2S 8 10
SAGINAW BAY

    1974
                         3        2

                           SPATIAL SEGMENT

-------
to
in
             o>

             cr»
             oo
             o
             (D
             o

             CL

          3 CU
          c+ua
          n> -s
          "*5 Co
          CO 3
          O
          r+ O
          -O  -••
          CO  3
          <~h O
          3- -"•
          S -O
          CO  CU
             O
             Q.
             fD
             O
             O
CO

i
n>
             to

             Co
             3
             Q.
                             NON-AVAILABLE
                                 SILICON
NON-AVAILABLE
  PHOSPHORUS


       I
                                                                                            i

-------
MODEL CALIBRATION

    The calibration process consists of adjusting model  coefficients  within
their reported ranges in the literature to obtain the  best  possible corre-
spondence between model output and field data.  With a simple  model,  human
intuition is usually adequate to determine the goodness  of  fit.   With
sophisticated models, it is usually necessary to resort  to  more  systematic
methods.

    For the present model, there were  12 independent variables in each  of
five spatial segments for which field  data were available.   Consequently,
there were 60 segment-variable combinations for each of  13  sampling cruises.
It was  impossible to rely completely on human intuition  for model  calibra-
tion.

    Calibration of the model was facilitated by use of the  Model  Verifi-
cation  Program (MVP) developed by Manhattan College (Thomann and  Winfield
1976; Thomann et aj_. 1979).  The MVP is a system of statistical  programs
which can analyze the goodness of fit  between model output  and field  data
for each model run.  Analyses can include the Student's  T-test,  regression
tests,  and tests for relative error.   Only the Student's T-test  has been
used to date for the Saginaw Bay phytoplankton model.


MODEL RESULTS

    Model results for all 12 variables and all five segments have been  re-
ported  in terms of the MVP.  Selected  model results have been  reported
graphically for segments two and four.  Segment four represents  the volume
of water in Saginaw Bay with the highest water quality,  and segment two best
represents the lower water quality in  the inner portion  of  the bay because
it contains the largest volume of the  three inner bay  segments.

    Table I contains results of the MVP Student's T-test for the  best cali-
bration run to date.  The T-test has been applied on a cruise-by-cruise,
segment-by-segment basis for each of the 12 independent  variables. Results
have been reported as percent of sampling cruises for  which there is  no
significant difference between model output and field  data  at  the 95  percent
confidence level.  The overall average for the five model segments was  83
percent.  In a purely statistical context, this implies  that the  model  out-
put for the indicated 12 variables describes the Saginaw Bay system approxi-
mately  83 percent as well as the data  for these 12 variables describes  the
Saginaw Bay system.  It should be noted that variability in the  field data,
as well as accuracy in the model output, will lead to  favorable  MVP re-
sults.

    Graphical results for phytoplankton concentrations in segments two and
four are shown in Figures 7-14.  All field data have been presented as the
mean plus or minus one standard error.  A logarithmic  scale has  been  used
because it was found that the phytoplankton data followed a log-normal
distribution.  Such a scale causes difficulty in determining goodness of

                                   352

-------
TABLE  ],  STATISTICAL COMPARISON BETWEEN MODEL
            OUTPUT AND FIELD DATA
Model variable


Chloride
Diatoms
Greens
Others
Non-N2 blue greens
N2 blue greens
Total zooplankton
Total phosphorus
Total nitrogen
Dissolved phosphorus
Dissolved nitrogen
Dissolved silicon
Percent of sampling cruises
significantly different
not
Segment number
1
92
92
100
92
69
59
70
100
75
100
71
57
2
100
100
92
92
92
89
90
100
73
77
92
92
3
85
92
75
58
92
67
60
82
64
33
42
54
4
92
92
100
92
100
78
100
91
83
42
92
77
5
100
73
100
91
100
100
100
100
91
33
75
77
    Average     81
91
67
87
87
                    353

-------
CO
en
               100
            O)
            E
   10.0
QC

2 1.00
LU
o

O
O
C/3
C/5
              0.10
           O
           CO
              0.01
                                                             SAG IN AW BAY
                                                                   1974
                                                              Diatoms
                                                             Segment 2
                            F    M    A   M
                                              '  A  '  S '  0  '  N   '  D
         Figure 7.  Comparison between model output and field data for diatom biomass in segment two.

-------
                100
CO
tn
en
 - 10.0
o
H

QC
h-

LJJ
O
z
o
o
CO
CO
            o
            CO
               1.00
               0.10
               0.01
                                                              SAG IN AW BAY

                                                                    1974

                                                                Green Algae

                                                                 Segment 2
                                                            A   S    0    N    D
      Figure 8.  Comparison between model output and field data for biomass of green algae in segment two.

-------
OJ
01
01
                100
             O)
             E
            o
            I-
LU
CJ
z
o
CJ
C/5
CO
               10.0
               1.00
               0.10
            O

            GO
               0.01
                                                  SAGINAW BAY

                                                        1974

                                                Non-N2 Blue-Greens

                                                      Segment 2
                                 M  '  A  '
                                M
'  0 '   N  '   D
       Figure 9.  Comparison  between model  output and field data for biomass of non-N2-fixing blue-greens
                                            in  segment two.

-------
OJ
en
IUU
_J
en
^ 10.0
o
I-
H-
ir; 1-00
LLJ
o
o
o
CO
CO
| 0.10
O
m
n m
SAG IN AW BAY
1974

" N2 Blue-Greens
Segment 2


— —






I -
T ^S T***'"**1^
( > X^**^ ^S*"s^*^
M J j
                         JF     MAMJJASOND
         Figure  10.   Comparison  between  model  output and field data for biomass of ^-fixing blue-greens
                                                 in segment two.

-------
CO
en
CO
              100
           O)

           E
o

h-
<
cc
h-
z
UJ
O

o
o
CO
GO
              10.0
              1.00
             0.10
          O

          CD
             0.01
                                                            SAG IN AW BAY

                                                                 1974
                                                                Diatoms

                                                              Segment 4
M    A   M    J    J    A
                                                                     0  '   N
                                                                      D
        Figure 11.  Comparison  between model output and field data for diatom biomass in segment four,

-------
co
en
10
                100
   10.0
            o
            I-
LU

O
Z

O
O

CO
CO
            O

            GO
               1.00
               0.10
               0.01
                                                            SAG IN AW BAY

                                                                 1974


                                                              Green Algae

                                                               Segment 4
                      JFMAM'J'J'A'S'  o  '  N  '  D
            Figure 12.  Comparison between model output and biomass of green algae in segment four,

-------
                 100
GO
CT)
O
              E 10.0
             o
             K
   1.00
LU
o

o
o
CO
CO
< 0.10
               0.01
                                                  SAG IN AW BAY
                                                       1974

                                                Non-N2  Blue-Greens

                                                     Segment 4
                       J
M   A    M
0 '   N
                                                                       D
           Figure 13.  Comparison  between model  output and field data for biomass of non-N2-fixing
                                    blue-greens in segment four.

-------
CO
crt
IUU
-1
O)
£ 10.0
z"
O
H-
<
oc
h-
s 1-°°
UJ
o
^9
^.
O
O
CO
CO
| 0.10
i^^B
O
GQ
n 01
\j.\j i
SAG IN AW BAY
1974
N2 Blue-Greens
Segment 4





— —






- —


< > _ ^^^^
J'F'M'A'M'J'J'A'S'O'N'D
Figure 14. Comparison between model output and field data for biomass of No-fixing
                                           blue-greens in segment four.

-------
fit by strictly graphical means because of  its  non-linearity.   This  was an
additional reason for using the MVP.

    In general, the concentrations for each phytoplankton  group were ap-
proximately an order of magnitude higher in segment  two  than  in segment
four.  This trend was a reflection of higher nutrient  concentrations and
the resulting lower water quality in the inner  portion of  the  bay.

    Model output generally followed the trends  in the  data for the various
phytoplankton groups.  Difficulties were experienced in  both  segments  two
and four with model output for diatoms during the third  quarter of the year.
In addition, the trend of the diatom output was somewhat high  during Spring
in segment four.

    Results for dissolved ortho-phosphorus concentrations  in  segments  two
and four are shown in Figures 15 and 16.  Phosphorus is  generally considered
to be the most important nutrient limiting the  growth  of phytoplankton in
freshwater systems.  The trend of the model output was low, compared to the
field data, in both of the segments.  The relatively poor  fit  for dissolved
ortho-phosphorus was consistent with below-average MVP results,  especially
in segment four (Table I).

    Initially, the poor fit for dissolved ortho-phosphorus  was  a matter of
serious concern because it was not possible to  improve the  fit  by adjusting
any of the model coefficients.  Model output for dissolved  ortho-phosphorus
depended heavily on the external phosphorus loading and the water circula-
tion rates among the various segments in the bay.  Both  of  these factors had
been determined independently and then used as  input to the phytoplankton
model.

    Subsequently, it was realized that the dissolved ortho-phosphorus  data
for 1974 were probably biased higher than the true concentrations.   In 1975,
the external phosphorus loading and the water circulation  rates  were essen-
tially the same as in 1974; however, the 1975 data for dissolved ortho-phos-
phorus were substantially lower than the corresponding data for  1974.   In
fact, the trend of the model output for dissolved ortho-phosphorus in  1974
agreed closely with the trend of the dissolved  ortho-phosphorus  data for
1975.

    The problem with the dissolved ortho-phosphorus data for  1974, es-
pecially at lower concentrations, was caused primarily by  logistical  diffi-
culties.  In 1974, samples were filtered immediately on  shipboard, but were
not analyzed until one to three days later.  In additi-on,  the  analytical
method used had not yet been refined to achieve maximum  sensitivity.   These
problems were corrected in 1975 and the analyses for dissolved  ortho-phos-
phorus were conducted on shipboard using a more refined technique.   The con-
sequences of the different approaches used for  1974 and  1975 were not
readily apparent until after data had been acquired for the two  years.
                                      362

-------
CO
CT)
OO
^u
CO
D
DC
O
? 30
ri
CO
O
I
0.
0 __,
[E *"- 20
DC §
O
O
LU
^ 10
O
CO
* A
CO
Q
0

SAG IN AW BAY

1974
— _
Segment 2

— _ _


— —

•«-

< >
" I i * i
-*'**«*- T I * ^ T
^~ ^JL ¥ S S"
NL * __-^— •^™
^>>^""'TO|V^M^»**B^'^*^M^M^ ' -^ ***^
i f*" R II ^ A R n i * i A f™* x™*\ ' ni ' P°x
                           J'FM'AMJ'JASOND
             Figure  15.   Comparison between model  output and field data for dissolved ortho-phosphorus
                                                  in segment two.

-------
CO
CTi
4U
CO
Z>
CL
O
i 30
Q.
CO
O
X
Q_
O _j
n: ^ 20
H Cn
QC 3.
0
Q
LU
> 10
_J IU
O
CO
CO
Q
0
SAG IN AW BAY
1974

Segment 4
— —

_ —


__ _


_ _


m 2 S
~~ • » 5 x~
'^-^^ , ^^^^ 	 1^, * 11 «
— ™— ^tt™*i*a" ^***—~
i ill i i i i i i I
J'F'M'A'M'J'J'A'S'O'N'D
             Figure 16.   Comparison between model output and field data for dissolved ortho-phosphorus
                                                 in segment four.

-------
DISCUSSION

    The importance of systematic quantitative methods for  analyzing  the
correspondence between model output  and field data  has been emphasized.   It
should be pointed out, however, that such methods are not  substitutes for
human intuition and common sense.  For example, the discrepancies  in the
case of dissolved ortho-phosphorus could not have been resolved strictly
through the use of statistical techniques.

    It has also been emphasized that phytoplankton  models  are  not  simply
arbitrary systems of equations which can be curve-fitted to any set  of field
data.  If a model is conceptually sound and internally consistent, discrep-
ancies should be expected to arise between model output and field  data in
cases where anamolies exist in a given set of field data.


REFERENCES

Bierman, V.J., Jr.  1976.  Mathematical model of the selective enhancement
    of blue-green algae by nutrient  enrichment.  In:  Modeling Biochemical
    Processes in Aquatic Ecosystems  ed. R.P. Canale, pp. 1-31.  Ann  Arbor,
    Michigan:  Ann Arbor Science Publishers.

Bierman, V.J., Jr., D.M. Do Ian, E.F. Stoermer, J.F. Gannon and V.E.  Smith.
    The Development and Calibration  of a Multi-Class Phytoplankton Model
    for Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron.  In press in U.S.  Environmental Protection
    Agency Ecological Research Series, 1979.

Bratzel, M.P., M.E. Thompson and R.J. Bowden (Eds.).  1977.  The Waters of
    Lake Huron and Lake Superior.  Vol. II (Part A).  Lake Huron,  Georgian
    Bay, and the North Channel.  Report to the International Joint Commis-
    sion by the Upper Lakes Reference Group.  Windsor, Ontario.  292 p.

Thomann, R.V. and R.P. Winfield.  On the Verification of a Three-Dimensional
    Phytoplankton Model of Lake Ontario.  In:  Proceedings of  the  Conference
    on Environmental Modeling and Simulation, U.S.  Environmental Protection
    Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1976.  pp. 568-572.

Thomann, R.V., R.P. Winfield and J.J. Segna.  Verification Analysis  of Lake
    Ontario and Rochester Embayment  Three Dimensional Eutrophication Models.
    In press in U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Ecological Research
    Series, 1979.
                                     365

-------
                                 SECTION 18

     A SEGMENTED MODEL OF THE DYNAMICS OF THE ECOSYSTEM OF  LAKE  BAIKAL
           CONSIDERING THREE-DIMENSIONAL CIRCULATION OF THE WATER

         V.V. Menshutkin1, O.M. Kozhova2, L.Ya. Ashchepkova2
                            and V.A. Krotova2


    A model of the seasonal dynamics of the pelagic ecosystem of Lake Baikal
is described, the main components of which are the phytoplankton,  zooplank-
ton, bacteria, nutrients and detritus.  The surface of the  lake  is  arbi-
trarily divided into 65 areas of equal size, and the volumes of water
divided into two zones:  the photosynthetic and destructive zones.  The in-
put functions of time include absorbed solar radiation, water temperature  in
both zones of the various regions of the lake, and the inputs of organic
matter from the largest sources of the lake.

    In calculating the status vector of an ecosystem, biologic and  hydro-
logic processes are considered in each step.  The redistribution of dis-
solved and suspended matter within the mass of water is performed  in the
model by means of horizontal advection and vertical turbulent mixing.  The
speed and direction of horizontal transfer in each region are constant
throughout the year and correspond to the overall system of circulation of
water in the lake.  The turbulent flows are proportional to the vertical
gradients of matter.  On the whole, the dynamics of spatial distribution of
plankton demonstrated by the model agrees well with the data of actual sur-
veys made in Lake Baikal.

    The ecosystem of the lake is a unique object for modeling.  Some fea-
tures are reminiscent of marine ecosystems in the temperate latitudes.  The
great length of the lake along its long axis, its extreme depths,  the
uniqueness of the structure and circulation of its water masses, and the in-
fluence of river runoff all create a broad range of conditions influencing
the seasonal dynamics of the ecosystem.

    Models of the ecosystem of Lake Baikal must consider the regionalization
of the lake.  In terms of horizontal distribution of plankton, a distinction
 Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biology, Academy of Sciences  of
 the USSR, 44 Morisa Toryeza Prospect, 194223 Leningrad, USSR.

2Irkutsk State University, A/Y2H 24 Lenin Street, 664003 Irkutsk,  USSR.

                                    366

-------
is made between  shallow  areas  (littoral  zones,  shoals  at  the  mouths of
rivers, bays)  and  deep water regions  (Kozhov  1962).   In terms of  the hydro-
meteorologic regime, there  are  three  characteristic  deep  water zones in
southern, central  and northern  Baikal,  specifically  the central portion of
the lake and the two littoral  areas adjacent  to the  eastern  and western
shores, as well  as embayments,  the  strait  of  Maloye  More,  and the Selenga
shallows.

    The basis  of the model  consisted  of two-layered  segments.  The water
area of the lake was divided into 65  fundamental  areas of  equal size,  so
that each of them  covered a region  which was  characteristic  in its hydro-
meteorologic aspect  (Figure 1).  The  size  of  each fundamental area was 484
km2, selected  so that a  single  area could  cover either of  the large bays,
Chivyrkuyskiy  and  Barguzinskiy.  Beneath these  areas are  segments consisting
of two zones.  The upper zone,  from 0-50 m depth, is the  zone of  photosyn-
thesis and the most mobile  portion  of the  body  of water.   The lower, the de-
structive zone,  extends  from 50 m depth  to the  bottom.  The  shallow regions
contain only the upper zones in their segments.

    Exchange between the segments in  the horizontal  and vertical  directions
is achieved by advection and turbulent  mixing.   The  system of currents in
Lake Baikal is complex,  variable, and insufficiently studied.  Therefore,
this paper seeks only to analyze the  overall  circulation of the waters of
Lake Baikal, specifically,  the  large-scale movements occurring over long
periods of time  (Krotova 1969).  The  basis for  the system  of  overall circul-
ation  (Figure  1) was the result of  calculations of geostrophic currents from
thermal survey data  (July-October)  covering the entire lake  and its individ-
ual parts (Krotova 1970) and the mean multiannual dynamic  topography of the
surface of Lake  Baikal (Figure  2).  This was  obtained  by  dynamic  processing
of 2256 hydro logic measurements performed  for the months  of August and
September from 1925 to 1965.   The horizontal  structure of  the overall  cir-
culation has been  confirmed by  the  release of 1860 experimental drift  bot-
tles,  specially  designed floats (Pomytkin, 1962), and  instrumented measure-
ments  from the surface to the  bottom  over  a period of  a number of days, both
during the ice season and during the  navigation season (Verbolov  1977a,
1977b).

    The available material  indicates  that  a single cyclonic  circulation en-
compasses the  entire lake.  Movement  is most  intensive and continuous  from
south  to north along the eastern shore.  On the average, the  summer move-
ment is traced from Slyudyanka  to Davsha (Figure  2), and  reaches  depths of
50-75  m.  The  speed of this shoreline current in  southern  Lake Baikal
reaches 9-13 cm/sec, 5 km from  the  shore.   In the central  section, its
velocity is 4 cm/sec at  5-8 km  from the  shore,  and in  the  vicinity of  the
Svyatoy Nos Peninsula a  velocity of 7 cm/sec  is reached.   North of Davsha,
the current weakens, and its vertical thickness decreases  to  10-20 m.

    The current  in the opposite direction  - from  north to  south along  the
western shore  -  is not as strong.   Its  speed  is 2-7  cm/sec,  and it expands
down to 20-50 m  depth.   In  a number of  places,  it is complicated  by an up-
welling effect.


                                     367

-------
                                          UPPER

                                      ANGARA RIVER  #f
                          MALOYEMOYE.
                            STRAITS  -.;
                                                          CHIVYRKUYSKIY

                                                          BAYJ:


                                                      {•SVYTOY NOS. PENINSULA
                                                       '   /""
                                                          •BARGUZIN RIVER
                                           SELENGA RIVER
ANGARA RIVER
                                 S MISHIKHA RIVER
                     VYDRINAL RIVER
    KHARA-MURIM RIVER
     Figure 1.   Regionalization of Lake Baikal  in the model and
                  direction  of horizontal  transfer.
                                  368

-------
CO
Ch
           Figure 2.  Geostrophic circulation on the surface of Baikal (a) and depth of circulation (b),
                average for August-September 1925-1965.  Speed in cm/sec, vertical thickness in m.

-------
    The cyclonic formation, covering almost  the  entire  lake,  is  divided into
quasi-steady circular systems moving in the  same direction:   one in  the
southern extremity of the  lake, another between  Listvenichnyy Bay and  the
Selenga River delta, a third outside of Olkhon  Island,  a  fourth  north  of the
Ushkaniy Islands, and a fifth in the northern extremity of  the lake  (Figure
1).  The cyclonic circulations are usually elliptical in  form.   Their  trans-
verse horizontal side is comparable to the width of  the lake,  and their
longitudinal dimension reaches 7-106-9-106 cm.   In the  interior,  the
currents extend much less  deeply into the water  than at the periphery;  the
average depth for August-September being 10-15 m.  In the region  of
Listvenichnyy Bay, a quasi-steady anticyclonic circulation  is  formed,  while
in Maloye More, Chivyrkuyskiy and Barguzinskiy Bays  cyclonic  vortices  mea-
suring 1.5*106 - 4'106 cm  are formed.  Anticyclonic  vortex formation is
observed during the summer down to 75 m.

    On the  long axes of the cyclonic circulations are divergence  zones, in
which we see the highest values of the vertical  components of  flow speeds,
directed upward.  We can estimate the order  of magnitude  of vertical speed
on the basis of the relationship of the horizontal (V)  and  vertical  (W) com-
ponents of  the speed and the horizontal (L)  and  vertical  (H)  dimensions of
the body of water (V/W = L/H).  Since Lake Baikal is 636  km long  and its
mean depth  is 700 m, the horizontal speeds of 1-10 cm/sec correspond to
vertical speeds on the order of 10~3 and 10~2 cm/sec.   Furthermore,  we
know that the variation in depth of the zero flow surface at  Lake Baikal
may be as great as 100 m (Krotova 1970).  This surface  may be  wedged out in
the central regions of the cyclonic formations,  located near  the  center of
the lake, or along its western shore, then drop  to a depth of  100 m  at  the
periphery,  e.g., along the eastern shore.  In this case,  W/V  is  equal  to the
ratio of the change in thickness of the layer involved  in the  flow,  AH, to
the distance AL over which this change occurs.   Assuming  V, as before,  to be
equal to 1  and 10 cm/sec,  and AL to be 20-40 km, where  AH = 100  m we produce
vertical speeds of the same order of magnitude,  10~3 and  10~2  cm/sec.

    Finally, the time of transfer of a mass  of water by the vertical move-
ment from the surface to the bottom should be of the same order  of magnitude
as the time required to transfer a mass through  the  entire body  of water
(Chekotillo 1965).  Given  the values of horizontal speeds of  1 and 10
cm/sec, and the length of  the horizontal path of about  1000 km,  the  duration
of vertical motion is approximately 3 years  and  4 months.

    In southern Lake Baikal, in addition to  divergence  zones,  local  areas of
upwelling and downwelling  of water as a result of surge phenomena are  well
known.  Upwelling is most  clearly expressed  in two sections along the  west
coast, from Kultuk to Cape Polovinny, and from the mouth  of the  Angara to
Cape Goloustny.  In the regions of Peschanaya Bay to Cape Bolshoy Kadilny,
To'sty Bay to Cape Polovinny, the Khara-Murin River to the Vydrinaya  River,
the Mishikha River to Istokskiy Sor, the water constantly descends (down-
welling).  On maps of the  dynamic topography, the dynamic horizontals  inter-
sect the shoreline (Figure 2a).

    In modeling Lake Baikal, it was assumed  that the exchange  between  seg-
ments in the horizontal direction occurs as  a result of advection, and in

                                     370

-------
the vertical direction  as  a  result  of  turbulent  diffusion.   Furthermore,  it
was assumed that the  direction  and  speed  of  the  current  and  level  of  the
water at each point  in  the lake are  constant throughout  the  entire year.
This means that in each  unit of time,  each segment  gives  its  neighbors  as
much water as it receives  from  them.   The condition  of balance  also occurs
for any connected subsystem  of  segments.

    The status of the ecosystem of  Lake Baikal on each day of year t  is
determined in the model  by the  concentrations of the  five primary  elements:
phytoplankton b] (k,  i), zooplankton b2 (k,  i),  detritus 03  (k,  i),
bacteria b4 (k, i) and  nutrients b$  (k, i),  where k  = 1,  2 is the  num-
ber of upper and lower  zones, i  = 1, 2, ...,  65  is the number of each seg-
ment.  The concentrations  are measured in kcal/m3.   Variable  b$  (k, i)
does not refer to a specific chemical  element, but rather to  certain  hypo-
thetical nutrients; the  energy  equivalent of the potential material for the
creation of primary production.  In the six  shallow  sections, mentioned
earlier, are segments with only a surface zone,  so that the  total  number of
zones is 124.   Thus, the status of the system is characterized  by  a vector
with 620 components.  The time  interval is equal to  one day.

    Calculation of the system status vectors for each step is performed in
two stages.  In the first stage, biologic processes  are simulated  (growth,
grazing, metabolism, death).   They are reflected by the same  functions  as  in
the energy model  of the Lake Baikal pelagic  ecosystem constructed  earlier
(Ashchepkova e_t aj_.  1977).   Some of them  are calculated with  corrections for
temperature,  which varies significantly in the first  zone during the  course
of the year.   It is assumed,  in particular,   that the  optimal  temperature for
grazing of zooplankton is 10°C  (Pomazkova 1970), for  the growth of algae,
1.5°C.  The daily changes in concentration Abj(k, i)  in this  stage are
determined from the equations:
Ab-
               - C
                           12
                     -Q-,  -
                                     M
Ab2(k, i) = 0.8 x
                               C2) -
                                                  - Mk,
Ab3(k, i
                   = 0.2 x
                                             Mk + Mk
                                              1    2'
         Ab4(k, i) =
Ab5(k, i
          = - P
Qk + Q2
                                      QJJ,
                                              k =  1, 2.
where p  is the rate of photosynthesis, Cj£ is the ratio of the a   compon-
ent to the jth. Cn is the cost of metabolism of the jth component, M^  is the
death of the j*h component.  In the upper zone P1 is determined in accord-
ance with the limitation principle of Libikh, in the lower zone P2 = 0.
                                     371

-------
    In the second stage of calculation of the status vector, hydrologic
transforms are applied to the vector produced earlier, simulating  horizontal
and vertical transfer.  The transfer coefficients  (Figure 3), representing
the fraction of the volume of the upper zones of the segments which moves in
a given direction during a given day, are calculated from the condition of
balance, based on data on current speeds.

    Detritus and the accompanying bacteria sink at a constant speed.  Phyto-
plankton is held at the top surface of the water during the ice season.
After the ice thaws, most of the algae begin to descend into the deeper
layers of water, beyond the photosynthetic zone, due to the loss of floata-
tion by the cells (Skabichevskiy 1960).  Thus, the quantity of algae, detri-
tus and bacteria sinking during the course of a day from the upper layer
into the lower layer is calculated by the equation
         "J-
.-d,  i),     k = 1,


.d,  i)/15,  k = 2,
j = 1, 3, 4; i = 1, 2, ..., 65,
where V  is the sinking coefficient:

                0.05 for j = 3, 4 or j = 1 and t > 150,
         Vj =
                0 for j = 1 and other values of t
where t is the time in days.

    Since zooplankton can move independently, the long-term sinking of this
group is not considered in the model.  It is assumed that the distribution
of zooplankton through the mass of the water is in accordance with the feed-
ing and thermal conditions of the medium.  The diffusion of water is inter-
preted in the model as exchange between vertical zones, proportional to the
difference in concentration of the components they contain:
         W.j(K, i) =•
 w..d)  x (b..(2,  i)  - b..(l,  i)),  k = 1,


 Wj(i)  x (bjd,  i)  - bj(2,  i)),  k = 2,
                    i = 1, 2, ..., 65
where wj(i) is the mixing coefficient in segment  i.

    Calculations were performed on an BESM-222 computer.  In all segments,
values of the input functions are assigned for each day of the year:  ab-
sorbed solar radiation, influence of the photosynthetic processes in the
surface zones of segments, and water temperature.  These quantities reflect
the mean indices of the sum of absorption of solar energy in the southern,
middle and northern trenches of the lake over a period of many years, as
well as the dynamics of effective temperature in the photosynthetic zone in
all parts of the lake (Rossolimo 1957; Bufal 1966; Verbolov 1969).  In the
lower zones, the temperature is constant and is equal to 4°C.  It is assumed

                                     372

-------
                                                   0,1
                                    <^  (34) •"s-Z
                                  °-io5i^/yx   |
                                    (yh* *  (S^« *V
                                  205^^     » >/o
 Figure 3,   Diagram  of horizontal exchange between segments  in model.
Circles show number  of section, arrows show direction of flow, numbers
 arrows show fraction of volume of upper zone of segment moving  in
                      corresponding directions.
                                 373

-------
in the model that the annual runoff  into Lake Baikal  is  through  three
rivers, the Selenga, Barguzin and Upper Angara.  The  Selenga  brings  in  half
of all the water, i.e,. 30 km3/yr.   Since the exchange of  each of  the
upper segments is 242*10^ m3, the input rate of water from the Selenga
into Lake Baikal is equal to about 0.005 of the volume of  an  upper  layer
during a day.  The flow of water from the Barguzin and Upper  Angara  is  0.002
and 0.003 times the volume/day, respectively, so that the  Upper  Angara  each
day brings in 1 percent of the volume of the upper segment adjacent  to  its
mouth.  The rivers bring in more than 4-105 tons of organic matter  each
year, about 2/3 of the total quantity coming in with the Selenga (Votintsev,
Popovskaya 1969).  If we assume that the remaining quantity of organic  mat-
ter is divided evenly between the Barguzin and Upper Angara Rivers,  the
loading to the system corresponding  to these rivers will contain the fol-
lowing concentrations of organic matter:  Selenga River, 6 g/m3; Barguzin
River, 3.75 g/cm3; Upper Angara River, 2.5 g/m3.

    At the initial moment in time, January 1, all components  of  the  system
are evenly distributed among the segments.  By the end of  the first  year,
the transient process is completed,  and beginning on January  1 of the next
year, the spatial distribution of variables calculated is  printed out.  In-
formation on the dynamics of the system is generated in the form of  maps of
the horizontal distribution of any of five components of the  ecosystem  in
the lower or upper layer of the segments, and in the form  of  graphs  of  their
change with time in the assigned layer for any selected section  of the  lake.

    If the distribution of the concentration of phytoplankton obtained  in
the model in the upper layer during  the course of the year  (Figure 4) is
examined, it may be compared with the results of observations (Figure 5).
Although 1964 characteristically has the longest series of observations on
the condition of the plankton, it differs significantly from  an  average
year, primarily in the very richness of the phytoplankton.  This was a  so-
called "mellosing" year, in which the ordinary dynamics of phytoplankton are
disrupted:  The spring peak of biomass of algae was very great,  but  there
was practically no fall peak at all.  Nevertheless, it is  possible to com-
pare the qualitative picture of the  dynamics of distribution  of  plankton in
the model and in Lke Baikal during the periods of formation and  elimination
of the spring maximum of biomass.

    A comparison of the dynamics of  plankton throughout the year in  the
model with the results of actual surveys leads to the conclusion that,  on
the whole, the model reflects the actual picture rather well.  One major ad-
vantage of the model is the fact that it enables the tracing  of  the  path of
propagation of matter entering the lake, and considers its transformation  in
the biologic system.  Furthermore, it enables an estimation of how  changes
in the status of the ecosystem at any point on the lake influence  its state
in other regions.  For scientific purposes, the model is also useful as a
research tool, revealing the key processes necessary for prediction  of  the
behavior of the system.  It enables  a determination of the direction of
further scientific research, outlining the contours of the  problems  for eco-
nomic model for planning and prediction of the economic development  of
regions adjacent to Lake Baikal.


                                     374

-------
                                Ill
IV
                                                                VI
                                                                           VII
                                                                                      VIII
                                                       IX
CO
^J
en
            Ftiytoplankton

              kcal/m3
              Figure 4.   Horizontal  distribution  of phytoplankton throughout the year  in  the 0-50 m  layer
                                                    (generated by  model).

-------
                              MAY
                                                   JUNE
                                                                     JULY
                                                                                       AUGUST
GJ
-»-J
CT>
                  Figure 5.   Distribution of  phytoplankton in Lake Baikal  in  the 0-25 m layer  in  1964
                                             (after Votintsev, e_t al_. 1975).

-------
REFERENCES

Ashchepkova, L.Ya., V.I. Gurman, and O.M. Kozhova.  1978.  An energetic
    model of the pelagic community of Lake Baikal.  Modeli prirodnykh
    sistem.  Nauka Press, Novosibirsk, pp. 51-57.

Bufal, V.V.  1966.  The radiation regime of the Baikal trench and its role
    in the formation of climate.  Klimat ozera Baykal i Pribaykalya.  Nauka
    Press, Moscow, pp. 34-71.

Chekotillo, K.A.  1965.  The time of vertical transfer of water in the
    ocean.  Okeanologicheskiya issledovaniya, 13, pp. 24-29.

Kozhov, M.M.  1962.  Biology of Lake Baikal.  Acad. Sci. USSR Press, Moscow,
    p. 315.

Krotova, V.A.  1969.  The water balance.  Level.  Currents.  Wave action.
    Atlas Baykala.  Main Administration for Geodesy and Cartography,
    Irkutsk-Moscow, pp. 12-13.

Krotova, V.A.  1970.  Geostrophic circulation of the waters of Baikal during
    the period of direct thermal stratification.  Techeniya i diffuziya vod
    Baykala.  Nauka Press, Leningrad, pp. 11-14.

Pomazkova, G.I.  1970.  Zooplankton of Lake Baikal.  Auth. abst. diss. for
    degr. of Cand. Biol. Sci., Irkutsk, p. 22.

Pomytkin, B.A.  1962.  Some information on currents in the southern portion
    of Baikal.  Meteorologiya i gidrologiya, 11, pp. 47-49.

Rossolimo, L.L.  1957.  Temperature regime of Lake Baikal.  Acad. Sci. USSR
    Press, Moscow, p. 551.

Skavichevskiy, A.P.  1960.  Planktonic diatoms of fresh waters in the USSR.
    Moscow State University Press, Moscow, p. 352.

Verbolov, V.I.  1969.  The temperature of the surface of a lake.  The radia-
    tion balance.  Total absorbed radiation.  Effective radiation.  Atlas
    of Baikal, Main Administration for Geodesy and Cartography, Irkutsk-
    Moscow, p. 11.

Verbolov, V.I.  1977a.  Horizontal currents in Baikal.  The ice season.
    Techeniya v Baykale.  Nauka Press, Novosibirsk, pp. 10-16.

Verbolov, V.I.  1977b.  General characteristics of the currents during the
    navigation season.  Techeniya v Bayale.  Nauka Press, Novosibirsk, pp.
    43-62.

Votintsev, K.K. and G.I. Popovskaya.  1969.  Phytoplankton and water chemis-
    try.  Atlas of Baikal.  Main Administration for Geodesy and Cartography,
    Irkutsk-Moscow, p. 20.


                                     377

-------
Votintsev, K.K., A.I.  Meshcheryakova,  and 6.1.  Popovskaya.   1975.  The cycle
    of organic matter  in Lake Baikal.   Nauka Press, Novosibirsk, p. 190.
                                    378

-------
                                  SECTION  19

    THE TASK OF OPTIMAL PLANNING  OF  DISCHARGE OF  POLLUTANTS  IN  A  DYNAMIC
               MODEL OF SELF-PURIFICATION OF A  BODY  OF  WATER

                    O.M. Kozhova  and  L.T. Aschepkova1


SUPPLEMENTARY RESULTS

    We will be studying the vector differential equation

         x = f(x,w),  x(t ) = h(v)                                       (1)
                         m        Y*                    Y*     n
with the parameters w e R , v e R .   The function h:R   -»•  R   is  assumed  con-
tinuously differentiable.   The function f :Rn x  Rm +  Rn  is continuous  along
with its derivatives, with the exception of the smooth  manifold

         p^x.w)  = 0, ..., ps(x,w) =  0                                   (2)

of dimensionality n + m - 1, on which finite discontinuities in its  value
are permitted.   The solution of Equation  (1) with the discontinuous  right
portion is taken  from A.F. Filippov  (I960).  As was  shown  in his  work,  the
solution exists at least in a small region of the initial values.

    Let us fix the number t-j > IQ and determine the  mapping  (v,w)  -*-  I(v,w),
assuming
where the solution x(t) of Equation (1), corresponding to v,w,  is  defined
for tg £ t £t-|, and I(v,w) = + m otherwise.  Here   : Rn ->• R  is  an  as-
signed function of the class C-|(Rn).  In what follows, the question  of  de-
rivatives of the function I is of interest.  Thus, the corresponding  re-
sults are presented (Aschepkov, Badam 1977).

    Suppose the solution x(t) of Equation  (1), corresponding  to  fixed v,w,
exists where tg <_ t <.t-|, and at instances t = T-| , .. ., TS it successively
intersects the surfaces of Equation (2) such that
1 Irkutsk State University, 1 K. Marks Avenue; 664003  Irkutsk, USSR,

                                    379

-------
         tg < T-| <  ...  <  Ts  < t-j,


         PiW^Kw) =  0, p-jW-u^.w)  ?  0,  i?j,


         Pi(x(Ti-),w) Pi(x(T.j + ),w)  > 0,  i,j  =  1,  ....  s.                 (3)


Condition (3) implies that the phase point  at  moment t = T-J falls only on
one surface p-j(x,w) = 0,  approaching and departing  at  non-zero angles;
Pi(x(T-j+), w) has the sense of the  corresponding  one-sided derivative of
function p-j(x(t), w) with respect to t,  on  th§ strength of Equation (1).
Let us relate to x(t),  w  the vector function $:  [t0, t-\ 1 -* Rri, the solution
of the conjugate differential equation
                                                                         (4)

with the condition of a jump at moment t  =  T-J:
              - ^'(Ti + ) Ax(T.j)  / pj(x(T.j-),w),



          xtT.j) '= x(Tr) - x(Ti + ),  i  =  1,  ...,  S.                        (5)
where H(t|j,x,w) = ^'flxjw)  is a Hamiltonian  function,  '  is the sign of trans-
position.  Due to the  linearity of  Equation  (4)  and  the unambiguity of the
conditions of the jump  (5), the solution  of  iKt),  tg <_ t <_ t-j , not only
exists but is unique.

    Under the assumptions  made above, function  I has at point v,w the
partial gradients Iy,  Iw,  which are  calculated  by  the equations

         Iv(v,w) = h'y(v)  iMt0),

                    s
         IW(V,W) =  I   yi  Piw(x(T.j),w) +
                   1=1

                   *1
                 + /   Hw(^(t), x(t),w) dt.                               (6)

                   *0
The procedure of calculation of the  derivatives  can  be organized, e.g., as
follows:

    1.  Equation (1) is  integrated  forward  in  time,  and the quantities
        i, T.J, X(T.J-),  X(T.J + ) are recorded;

                                     380

-------
     2.   Equation  (1),  (4),  (5) are integrated  in reverse  time  with the
         known  initial  values x(t-|), iKti) and with the  additional  equa-
         tion

         y  = -HW(IM,W), y(*i) = °-                                      (7)

In the process of integration, the sum z|< of vectors y-j p jw(x( TJ),W),  i=s,
s-1,  ..., k, is accumulated sequentially for k=s, s-1,  ...,  1.   The  deriva-
tives of interest to us are calculated through the values of  c •] (eg, c-i = const).

In areas with different levels of pollution, the composition of the  aquatic
communities are also different.  In strongly polluted areas, species pre-
dominate which  are capable of breaking down the pollutant (decomposers).
Relatively pure areas are populated by organisms which previously  inhabited
the pure body of water and have adapted to the new conditions.  The  activity
of the decomposers characterizes the self-purifying capability of the body
of water.

    The concentration of organisms inhabiting the pure medium  before the
pollutant was introduced may be represented by x-j, while x2 represents  the
concentration of decomposers.  The rate of change of x-|, x2 and X3 depends
on the concentration X3 at a given instant in time t.  In the model, using
certain simplifying assumptions,  we assume:

         x-| = xi(a-|-a2x-|), x2 = 0, x3 = v,   if x3   CQ;
                                     381

-------
         x., = - 3y XoXoj  if co < X3 < cl»


         x-j =0, x2 = ag   x2x3, x3 = - a7  6 x2x3 + v,   if x3  > c-|.      (8)


Here a], ..., ay are non-negative constant  coefficients;  6 = 0(t)  is  the
water temperature at time t; v is a term resulting from water  exchange.   The
values of v are defined as follows.  The body of water is approximated  by a
system of k chambers.  Each of them is a parallelepiped with identical  top
surface area, the height of which is equal  to the depth of the  body of
water.  Each number j of the jth chamber relates to a set Jj of  numbers of
neighboring chambers, with  J j | = 4 elements, while AJ-J are the  fractions of
the volume of water carried by the current  from j into chamber  i per  unit
time.  The order of numbering of the elements Jj is indicated  in Figure 1.
If the quantity of neighboring chambers is  less than 4, the corresponding
elements Jj and numbers Xjj are assumed equal to zero.  The vajues. x-j %  x2,
x3 and v relating to the jth chamber are represented by xJ, xJ,  x
-------
                  b  /i   /
                 t
                       /,
                Figure  1.   j..  =  (j^, J2> J3, J4)
10


 8


 6


 4


 2


 0
I    I     I
  0   1
             45678
                TEMPERATURE(D
9   10   11   12
                 Figure 2,  Temperature curve.

                                         u
    Figure 3.  Subdivision of body of water into chambers,
                0.7
1
0.7

2
0.7

3
0.7

4
                  o.if jo.i  o.iTJo.1  o.TJJo.1  o.ifTo.i
5

0.7
6

0.7
7

0.7
8
                0.7 .
              Figure 4.  Diagram of water exchange.
         Figures show  fraction A-H of volumes of chamber
               carried by current per unit time.
                              383

-------
                T  K          2
         I(u) = /  E  [x^-c,], dt.                                      (12)
                0 j=l   J    '

The problem is to determine the rate of discharge of the pollutant  in  the
form of a function of t, piecewise continuous over 10, T], satisfying
limitations (11) and minimizing function (12).

    With one additional  assumption, this problem can be reduced to  a problem
with parameters.  The sector [0, t] may be broken into m pairs of adjacent
intervals T], ..., Tm of identical length h = T/m.  In each of these inter-
vals, the control may be regarded as constant:

         u(t) = w.j, t e T.J, i = 1, ..., m.                               (13)

The limitations (11) for Equation (13) take on the form

                                      m
         un < u < u-,, i  = 1, ..., m;  E  w- = A/h.                       (14)
          u -   -   I                 i=1  i

To the equations for x^, x^ and x^, may be added the additional differential
equations
         X0 =
               .
- c^ ,  x4 = 1   (xQ(0) = 0, x4(0) = 0)
for calculation on integral (12) and time (t = x4(t)).  To Equation  (10) for
the discontinuity surfaces, additional equations may be added,

         x^ - ih = 0, i = 1 , . . ., m -1 ,

defining the moments of discontinuity of control (13).  As a result, we ob-
tain a problem of the same type as specified in the first paragraph.  Find
the vector of parameters w = (w-j, . . . , wm) satisfying limitations  (14) and
achieving the minimum of the functional

         I(w) = x0(T),                                                  (15)

assigned on the trajectory of the system

               K
         x^ = x^(a1-a2xJ), xjj = 0, x^ = vj,  if x^ < CQ;



         Xl = Xl(a3-Vl-a5 9 X2}> X2 = h 9 X2J4
                                   if c.j < x^ < c,;

                                     384

-------
            = 0, x^ = ag
                                          if X  > c-; j=l, ..., k;
         x4 = l,                                                        (16)

with the initial conditions

         x0(0) = 0, x4(0) = 0,


         xi(0) = xio» j = ]> 2' 3' j = U ••"  k'                        {17)

The right parts of system (16) have finite discontinuities on the surfaces

         PJ = x^ - c0 = 0, pk+J- = x^ - c-, = 0,  j  = 1,  ..., k,



         P2k+i = X4 " ih = °'  ] = lf '••' m "  ]'

The function vJ is defined by  Equation (9).


METHODS OF  SOLUTION OF THE CONTROL PROBLEM

    In order to find the optimal  parameters  in  Equations  (13) - (18),  the
gradient-type iterational  minimization methods  may be  used.   Let us the
equations used to calculate the derivatives  of  goal  function  (15).   We com
pose the function
                  k          ?    k
         H =  4^0  2 [*3 -  c-,]^ +  E  Hi  +
if
                                              J < CQ;
              ^1x1(a3-a4x-,-a5 6 x2)
              0 xa-a)  +   v,    if CQ
         H. = 6 x^x^ag^-ayi^) + ^3V,   if x  <

and use it to write the conjugate equations of (4)
            = - Hx.j, i = 1, 2, 3, j = 1, ..., k                        (20)

                                    385

-------
with the initial conditions
         U,J(T) = 0, i = 1, 2, 3, j = 1, ..., k.                          (21)

    Suppose the fixed w|, .... wm correspond to the solution xo(t), x-j(t),
X4(t) of system (16)-(17), intersecting at times TI, ..., TS, 0 < T-J <  ...
< TS < T, the surfaces (18) with numbers i-j, ..., is {!» 2,  ..., 2k + m - 1 }
such that conditions such as (3) are fulfilled.  This occurs, e.g., for
those T^ for which ijj, > 2k.  Since Equation (18) of the discontinuity sur-
faces is independent of XQ, it follows then from the conditions of the jump
(5) that function ^n(t) is discontinuous at times t = T£.  Consequently, on
the strength of (19) and (21), 4>0(t) = 1.   The conditions of the jump for
the remaining conjugate variables become

         *i = *i + ^ api   4
         1 —  I , £, o, J   I, >.., K, Jo   I, *••, S,


where
                                           £-),         1 <_ i£ £ k,


                    Zili^lT+lAY    i T 1 / V    (T  I     l^ <" 1      "   '0   t. ix j
                i=l                                            ~~

                 3   2      -2
                •j=1  i       i


                j     1, (i = 3, 1 < i£ <  2k)V(j = i£ V j = i£ - k),

            '^         0, otherwise


                      1, i£ > 2k,
         3pi /3x4 =
            £         0, i < i££ 2k.                                   (24)

We can see from Equations (23) and (24) that the function ^(t) is piecewise
continuous.  At times of switching of control, i.e.,  at the ends of inter-
vals TJ, it .has first-order discontinuities.  At these same times, the
functions ^(t), as Equations (22) and (24) show, remain continuous.
Writing the second equation of (6) for this problem,  we produce the required
values of derivatives of the functions (15) in the form
         Iw.(w) = /    (t)dt, i  = 1, ..., m.                            (25)

                   1                 386

-------
The  algorithm for  calculation  of derivatives  described  in  the  first  para-
graph  can  be  applied  to  this  case without  significant changes.   Instead  of
system (7)  of supplementary differential equations,  it  is  expedient  to
introduce  the scalar  equation

         »  •  -*§.

If we  integrate  this  equation  together with the  initial  and  conjugate equa-
tions  in sequence  over sections  T-j,  i = m, m  - 1,  ...,  1 with  the  initia-1
conditions  y(ih) = 0, at  times t = (i - l)h we will  have

         Iw.(w)  =  y((i-1)h),  i = m, m - 1,  ...,  1.

    Using the  derivatives of  (25), we can  realize  various  gradient proce-
dures of minimization of  goal  function (15) considering the  limitations  of
(14).  The  theory  and practice of solution of such problems  is  discussed in
detail elsewhere (Fiacco  and McCormick 1968; Himmelblau  1972;  Demyanova  and
Rubinov 1968;  Levitin and Polyak  1966).
RESULTS OF CALCULATION

    Equations (13) - (18) were solved on a BESM-6 electronic computer  with
the following initial data:

         K = 8, m = 12, q = 4, T = 12,

         CQ = 0.6, C1 = 1.9; U0 = 0, UT = oos A = 15;

         a-, = a3 = 0.1, a2 = a4 = 0.001, a5 = 0.01, a6 = a7 = 0.001;
The graph of function 6(t), a diagram of the subdivision of the  body  of
water into chambers, and the values of water exchange are shown  in Figures
2, 3, and 4.
                                             .JL.     JL,        .A.
    The research for the optimal parameters w  =,(wl» ..., W]2)  was Per-
formed by the method of the arbitrary gradient (Demyanov and Rubinov  1968)
by the iterational plan:

         wv+1 = wv + o^ - wv),
         I'(wv) w  = min I'w   w,
          w          weW

         I(wv+1) =  min  I(wv +   (v^ - wv)), v = 0,  1,  ...,
                   0
-------
by Levitin -and Polyak (1966).  As the initial approximation, we can select
the point w° with coordinates w° = 15/12, i  =1, ..., 12.  The temperature
curve was interpolated with respect to 6 shifting nodes by the method of
Lagrange.  The integration of the differential equations was performed by
the explicit method of Euler with a step of 0.01.  The optimal values of
the parameters were produced in the second iteration

         w* = w* = ... = w*  = 1.225, w* = 1.525,
           I    O           I L.           O
where I(w*) = 0.  The dynamics of propagation of the pollutant over the body
of water, corresponding to the optimal level of discharge, are shown in Fig-
ure 5.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    The authors express their gratitude to N.I. Baranchikova, who performed
the calculations.
REFERENCES

Ashchepkov, L.T. and U. Badam.  1977.  Theoretical and computational aspects
    of parametric optimization of systems with discontinuous right parts.
    Abstracts of reports of 4th National Conference on Problems of Theoreti-
    cal Cybernetics, Institute of Mathematics, Siberian Affiliate, USSR
    Acad. Sci., Novosibirsk, pp. 86-87.

Demyanov, V.F. and A.M. Rubinov.  1968.  Approximate methods of solution of
    extreme problems, Leningrad State University Press, 180 pp.

Fiacco, A.V. and Y.P. McCormick.  1968.  Nonlinear programming:  sequential
    unconstrained minimization techniques.  J. Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York-
    London-Sydney-Toronto, 240 pp.

Filippov, A.F.  1960.  Differential equations with discontinuous right part.
    Matematicheskii sbornik, 51(93), No. 1, pp. 99-128.

Himmelblau, D.M.  1972.  Applied nonlinear programming.  McGraw-Hill Book
    Co., 536 pp.

Levitin, Ye.S. and B.T. Polyak.  1966.  Methods of minimization with limita-
    tions.  Zh. vychislitel'noy matematiki i matematicheskoy fiziki, 6, No.
    6, pp. 787-823.

Pshenichnyy, B.N. and Yu.M. Danilin.  1968.  Differentiability of the solu-
    tion of systems of differential equations with discontinuous right parts
    on the basis of the initial value.  Teoriya optimal'nykh reshenii No.  1,
    Institute of Cybernetics, Ukrainian Acad. Sci., Kiev, pp. 64-68.

Rozenvasser, Ye.N.  1967.  General equations of sensitivity of discontinuous
    systems.  Avtomatika i telemekhanika, No. 3, pp. 52-56.

                                     388

-------
  t = 0
                                                   1.5-1.9
                                                   1-0-1.5
                                                   0.6-1.0
                                                 ] 0.4-0.6


                                                   0.2-0.4
                                                 J  <0.2
Figure 5.   Propagation  of a pollutant through a body of water
         corresponding  to optimal discharge levels.
                            389

-------
                                   TECHNICAL REPORT DATA     .
                            (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
 EPA-600/9-80-033
                                                           3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
4. TIT' E AND SUBTITLE
PROCEEDINGS  OF  THE SECOND AMERICAN-SOVIET SYMPOSIUM ON
THE USE  OF MATHEMATICAL MODELS TO OPTIMIZE WATER  QUALITY
MANAGEMENT
                                                           5. REPORT DATE
              July  1980 issuing date
             6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
   Environmental  Protection Agency - USA
   Institute of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics  - USSR
                                                           8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
  Large Lakes  Research  Station
  Environmental  Research Laboratory-Duluth
  Grosse  lie,  Michigan   48138
             10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.

                   A30B1A
             11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
              Joint US-USSR Project
              02.02-12
 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
  Environmental  Research Laboratory - Duluth,
  Office of  Research and Development
  U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency
  Duluth,  Minnesota   55804
             13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
               Inhouse
             14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE


                  EPA/600/03
 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
  Performed  as part of Project 02.02-12 (Water Quality  in  Lakes and Estuaries)
  of U.S.A./U.S.S.R.  Environmental Agreement.                        	
 16. ABSTRACT
       The  Joint  US-USSR Agreement on Cooperation  in  the  Field of Environmental  Pro-
  tection was  established in May of 1972.  These proceedings  result from one of  the
  projects,  Project 02.02-12, Effects of Pollutants on  Lakes  and Estuaries.
       As knowledge related to fate and transport  of  pollutants has grown, it has  be-
  come increasingly apparent that local and even national  approaches to solving  pollu-
  tion problems are insufficient.  Not only are the problems  themselves frequently
  international,  but an understanding of alternate methodological  approaches to  the
  problem can  avoid needless duplication of efforts.  This  expansion of interest from
  local and  national  represents a logical and natural maturation from the provincial
  to a global  concern for the environment.
       In general,  mankind is faced with very similar environmental problems regard-
  less of the  national  of political boundaries which  we have  erected.  While the
  problems may vary slightly in type or degree, the fundamental and underlying factors
  are remarkably  similar.   It is not surprising, therefore, that the interests and
  concerns of  environmental  scientists the world over are  also quite similar.  In  this
  larger sense, we  are  our brother's brother, and  have  the  ability to understand our
  fellowman  and his dilemma, if we but take the trouble to  do so.   It is this singular
  idea of concerned scientists exchanging views with  colleagues that provides the
  basic strength  for this project.	
17.
                               KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                                                                           COS AT I Field/Group
  mathematical models
  lakes
  rivers
  water quality
  water pollution
  water flow
 US-USSR Agreement in the
  Field of Environmental
  Protection
 Eutrophication
 Ecosystems
   06/D
   08/H
   12/A
   13/B
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT


  Release to public
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Reportj
    Unclassified
21. NO. OF PAGES
    410
20. SECURITY CL.ASS (This page)
    Unclassified
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
                                                            U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1980—657-165/0072

-------