EPA-R2-73-145
MARCH 1973
Environmental Protection Technology Series
A Thermal Wave Flowmeter
for Measuring
Combined  Sewer Flows

                                 Office of Research and Monitoring

                                 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                 Washington, D.C. 20460

-------
            RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES
Research reports of the  Office  of  Research  and
Monitoring,  Environmental Protection Agency, have
been grouped into five series.  These  five  broad
categories  were established to facilitate further
development  and  application   of   environmental
technology.   Elimination  of traditional grouping
was  consciously  planned  to  foster   technology
transfer   and  a  maximum  interface  in  related
fields.  The five series are:

   1.  Environmental Health Effects Research
   2.  Environmental Protection Technology
   3.  Ecological Research
   U.  Environmental Monitoring
   5.  Socioeconomic Environmental Studies

This report has been assigned to the ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION   TECHNOLOGY   series.    This   series
describes   research   performed  to  develop  and
demonstrate   instrumentation,    equipment    and
methodology  to  repair  or  prevent environmental
degradation from point and  non-point  sources  of
pollution.  This work provides the new or improved
technology  required for the control and treatment
of pollution sources to meet environmental quality
standards.

-------
                                              EPA-R2-73-145
                                              March 1973
A THERMAL WAVE FLOWMETER FOR MEASURING
            COMBINED SEWER FLOWS
                         By

       Paul W.  Eshleman and Robert A.  Blase


                   Project 11020 EYD


                   Project Officer

                  Harry C. Torno
         Office of Research and Monitoring
         Environmental Protection Agency
              Washington,  D. C.  20460


                    Prepared for

   OFFICE  OF  RESEARCH AND MONITORING
 U. S.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
            WASHINGTON,  D. C. 20460
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.G. 20402
             Price $1.25 domestic postpaid or $1.00 GPO Bookstore

-------
               EPA Review Notice
This report has been reviewed by the Environmental
Protection Agency,  and approved for publication.
Approval does not signify that the contents necessar-
ily reflect the views and policies of the Environmental
Protection Agency,  nor does mention of trade names
or commercial products constitute endorsement or
recommendation for use.
                   I!

-------
                       ABSTRACT

A study of the application of thermal techniques to the measurement
of flow rates in combined sewers has been conducted.  The utiliza-
tion of flush-mounted hot wire or hot film anemometers in a direct
reading mode was extensively investigated.  It was concluded that
such a direct reading application was not feasible due to shifts in
calibration caused by the build-up of contamination and the lack of
commercially available units with sufficient ruggedness and reliabil-
ity for application in a combined sewer pipe.

A particular technique, which is based upon measuring the time-of -
flight of thermal pulses generated at various positions around the
periphery of the pipe,  was investigated in depth.  A full scale proto-
type unit using five thermal wave sensors distributed around one-
half of the circumference of the pipe was fabricated and tested.
These tests indicated that the present configuration does not provide
signals which have adequate precision to enable this unit to measure
the fluid flow with the desired accuracy.

This report is submitted in partial fulfillment of Contract No.  14-12-
911 under the sponsorship of the United States Environmental Pro-
tection Agency.
                             111

-------
                        CONTENTS

Section
I         Conclusions                                        1
II         Recommendations                                  3
HI        Introduction                                        5
IV        Literature Search Results on Hot Film
          Anemometry                                       7
V         Thermal Wave Flowmeter Design Concept            21
VI        Hydraulic Considerations                            25
VII       Results of Preliminary Laboratory Experiments
          Utilizing Thermal Wave Flowmeter                   29
Vni       Detailed Prototype Design                           45
IX        Preliminary Flowmeter Calibration                  51
X         Full Scale Test Site Selection                        59
XI        Full Scale Flowmeter Calibration                    63
XII       Acknowledgements                                  65
XHI       References                                        67
XIV       Appendices
              A  List of Vendors                             81
              B  Design Drawing List                        83
              C  Strut Flowmeter Test at NSRDC              85
              D  Flowmeter Test at National Bureau
                 of Standards                                95
                                v

-------
                        FIGURES

Figure                                                     Page
   1      Commercial configurations of hot wire and hot
         film anemometers                                   9
   2      Schematic of constant current system                10
   3      Schematic of constant temperature system           12
   4      General sensor configuration                        22
   5      Model test sensor block                             30
   6      Model test hydraulic apparatus                      32
   7      Experimental instrumentation for model flow tests    33
   8      Thermal wave velocity versus mean velocity for
         the sensor block on the side of a 1-inch I. D. pipe     35
   9      Thermal wave velocity versus mean velocity for
         the sensor block on bottom of 1-inch I. D.  pipe        36
  10     Thermal wave velocity versus mean velocity for
         sensor block on top of 1-inch I. D.  pipe              37
  11     Thermal wave velocity versus mean velocity for
         sensor block on side of 2-inches I. D.  pipe           38
  12     Thermal wave velocity versus mean velocity for
         sensor block on bottom of 2-inches I. D. pipe         39
  13     Thermal wave velocity versus mean velocity for
         sensor block on side of 2-inches I. D.  pipe
         with wedge                                         40
  14     Thermal wave velocity versus mean velocity for
         sensor block on side of 1-inch pipe with wedge        41
  15     Thermal wave velocity versus mean velocity for
         all configurations                                   42
                               VI

-------
Figure                                                      Page
  16      Full scale sensor block in cross-section             46
  17      Proposed sewer pipe installation of flow
          measurement system                                47
  18      Calibration data                                    54
  19      Electrical calibration data                           55
  20      NSRDC calibration data (sensor #2)                  92
  21      Electrical calibration (actual time delay versus
          reading of the instrument)                          100

-------
                         TABLES

Table                                                        Page
   1       Instrument electrical calibration                     53
   2       Scott's Run hydraulic characteristics                 61
                               Vlll

-------
                         SECTION I
                       CONCLUSIONS
1.  A study of the application of thermal techniques to the measure-
ment of flow rates in combined sewers has been conducted,  and it
is concluded that extending the application of hot-film anemometry
techniques from fluid mechanics research to a commercial applica-
tion of measuring contaminated sewer effluent for extended periods
of time does not appear feasible.   The major reasons are:
     a.  the change in calibration that occurs due to contam-
         ination film build-up;
     b.  the breakdown of protective coatings over long periods
         of time; and
     c.  the change in calibration that occurs due to dissolved
         gases coming out of solution and depositing on the film
         element as bubbles.
2. A particular technique incorporating a heat source and sensor
located a known distance apart which can measure the time of flight
of a thermal pulse has been indicated feasible in scale model labora-
tory tests.
3. A prototype configuration for  a full scale demonstration  model
was developed.  It contained features to minimize sensitivity and
data scattering problems  observed during early scale model labora-
tory experiments.  The full scale  tests have indicated these problems
to be greater than noted in the model tests.
4. A calibration of the prototype unit has been attempted and  has
demonstrated the capability of this unit to indicate flow rates.  How-
ever, the calibration data indicate that certain flow factors affect the
instrument's performance to such an extent that the desired accuracy
cannot be achieved with the unit in its present configuration.

-------
                         SECTION II
                    RECOMMENDATIONS
An investigation of a flowmeter concept based upon the monitoring of
the flow in the boundary layer has been concluded. This concept of a
non-invasive flowmeter was based upon the measurement of the time
of flight of a thermal pulse.   The preliminary calibrations which were
conducted indicated that the  accurate measurement of fluid flow by the
non-intrusive means of injecting a small thermal pulse into the fluid
at its boundary layer is not presently feasible.  The dissipation of
heat was determined to be quite large,  as was the ratio of the average
stream velocity to the  apparent boundary layer velocity.  Future
examinations of non-invasive thermal flowmeters must deal with the
problems of adequate boundary layer penetration, minimal thermal
lag,  and adequate protective coating over the heater element.  In  addi-
tion,  power densities in excess of the 300 watts/square inch (instan-
taneous value) utilized in this approach must be examined.

-------
                        SECTION III
                      INTRODUCTION
This is a final report submitted to the Environmental Protection
Agency and contains the results of work conducted under Contract
No. 14-12-911.  The objective of the contract was to demonstrate the
feasibility  of a  thermal wave flow measuring device to provide for
the continuous measurement and recording of_flow_s_ in existing storm
and combined sewers without disrupting the capabilities of the sewer.
Phase I of  the contract consisted of a literature search, feasibility
study, and a proposed full scale design of the flow measuring system.
Phase II consisted of fabrication and preliminary testing of elements
of the full  scale prototype,  and Phase III consisted of full scale
testing and evaluation of prototype feasibility.
The proposed flow measurement system had a design goal of meas-
uring the volume flow rate in the sewer within five percent of its
actual value over the flow range.   The volume flow rate is computed
by making  two measurements:
      1. The average flow velocity in the pipe, and
      2. Area of flow as determined from a stage measurement.
The design range for measuring the average flow velocity encompassed
a stage/diameter ratio of 0. 067 through pressurized full channel flow.
The stage measurement capability ranges from stage/diameter ratios
from  zero  to one with continuous readout capability in between.  Re-
liable operation for a life of at  least  one year was desired.  Data
readout into a simple low-cost  recorder with the information in a
form  suitable for data processing was also provided.  Minimum pro-
trusion into the flow was a design requirement and no sharp edges or
snaggable protrusions were  permitted.

-------
The original proposed concept of operation was to utilize a series
of flush mounted hot-film anemometers configured along the wall
of the sewer pipe.  The forced convective heat transfer from the
anemometers would then be a measure of the average velocity in
the pipe.  After studying the results of the literature search and
conversations with researchers and vendors, it was concluded
that the originally proposed hot-film measuring system could not
maintain a constant calibration due to  contamination inherent in
the sewer environment.
A new concept which relied on the correlation of the velocity of a
heat wave generated at the periphery of the pipe to the average
velocity was then studied and the concept was experimentally vali-
dated in a 1-inch and 2-inch I. D. pipe.   A detail design of the flow
measurement system utilizing the thermal wave concept was then
completed and a prototype device was fabricated and tested.

-------
                      SECTION IV
            LITERATURE SEARCH RESULTS
                           ON
               HOT FILM ANEMOMETRY

The literature search was conducted with the intent of obtaining the
latest information on the development,  manufacturing techniques, past
applications, and experimental data on the use of hot-film anempmetry
for velocity and flow measurement of liquids.  The literature search
was composed of the following areas
     1.   Personal Contact
         a.  Vendor Companies
         b.  Researchers
     2.   Vendor Catalogs and Publications
     3.   Technical Reports
     4.   Symposium and Conference Reports
     5.   Thesis Publications
     6.   Textbooks
A detailed listing of the research literature is contained in Section
XI and references in the text are numbered in conjunction with the
listing contained in Section XI.  The following section is separated
into (1)  Theoretical Principles of Anemometry; (2) Survey of Past
Applications of Anemometry; (3) Survey of Vendors; (4) Survey of
Technical Discussions;  and (5) Conclusions.
THEORETICAL PRINCIPLES OF ANEMOMETRY
When an electrically heated wire or film is placed in a flowing fluid,
heat will be  transferred between the two, depending on a number of
factors,  including the flow rate.  This type of flow sensing element .

-------
is called a hot-wire or hot-film anemometer.  Typical commercial
configurations of these are depicted in Figure 1.
The cooling of the film is a function of the velocity of the flow;
temperature, density, viscosity, and thermal conductivity of the fluid;
temperature, diameter,  and length of the film backing  material; and
thickness of the film.  If all but one of the fluid flow and film variables
are kept constant, the heated film is a transducer for measuring the
remaining variable.  For variable fluid properties, as would be
experienced in sewer effluent,  the problem of constant calibration
would be nearly impossible.
The convective heat transfer from a cylinder has had extensive
theoretical and experimental study.  The potential flow solution is
attributed to King.  The King's law relation may be  expressed as;
          2
          I R            r-
            w  = A + BVU                              (1)
         R  -R
          w  a
in which:
          I =  electric current
        Rw =  electrical resistance of wire at wire temperature
        Ra =  electrical resistance of wire at fluid temperature
      A, B =  coefficients
         U =  velocity of flow

-------
  HOT WIRE
FINE WIRE
-TUNGSTEN
-PLATINUM
-PLATINUM ALLOY
-GOLD PLATED
 STAINLESS STEEL
 SUPPORTS
                                            1234   WEDGE FILM SENSOR
                                            SIDE
                                            FLOW
                                            WEDGE
                                                                           0.121
   --PLATING TO DEFINE
      SENSING LENGTH
 CYLINDRICAL HOT FILM (STANDARD SUPPORTS)

           GOLD PLATED
           STAINLESS STEEL
           SUPPORTS
               -GOLD PLATING DEFINES
                SENSING LENGTH

  -QUARTZ COATED PLATINUM FILM SENSOR
   ON GLASS ROD (O.OOl" TO 0.006" DIA.)
                               CONICAL  HOT FILM
                                            pQUARTZ

                            QUARTZ COATED
                            PLATINUM  FILM
                            BAND—,
                                                     GOLD FILM
                                                     ELECTRICAL LEADS
 CYLINDRICAL HOT FILM (SINGLE ENDED)

          CANTILEVER SUPPORTED SENSOR
          MADE FROM GLASS TUBE
 QUARTZ COATED
 PLATINUM FILM
 (O.O025"TO 0.006"
 DIA.)
 GOLD WIRE COMES
 THROUGH INSIDE OF
 SENSOR TO MAKE END
 ELECTRICAL CONNECTION
              STAINLESS STEEL
              SUPPORTING
              TUBES
                               PARABOLIC HOT FILM
   -GOLD PLATING DEFINES
    SENSING LENGTH
DUARTZ COATED
PLATINUM FILM
ON LEADING EDGE
                                               GOLD FILM
                                               ELECTRICAL LEADS
 WEDGE  HOT FILM

             QUARTZ ROD
                     GOLD FILM ELECTRICAL LEADS
    -QUARTZ  COATED PLATINUM
    FILM (0.004"* 0.040" EACH SIDE)
                                              FLAT SURFACE  HOT FILM
                                                   QUARTZ COATED     ,
                                                   HOT FILM         I !''
                                                   ON SURFACE
                            STAINLESS STEEL TUBE SHIELDING QUARTZ ROD
            Figure 1.   Commercial Configurations of Hot Wire and
                        Hot Film Anemometers.
                                      9

-------
 It has been found that, at best, King's law only holds for continuum
 flow at large Reynolds numbers.  For continuum incompressible
 flow, the best  experimental relation between mean heat loss and
 mean velocity  is
           i2
R
              w
        R  (R  -R0)
         w  w   a.
       = A+ BU11
(2)
 This relation is similar to King's; however,  n is a function of the fluid
 medium, overheat ratio, sensor, and mean velocity.  Again,  cali-
 bration accuracy can only be maintained in closely controlled
 experiments.
 Two methods are employed to measure flow.  The first technique
 employs  a constant current passing through the  sensing wire.  Varia-
 tion in flow results in changed wire temperature; hence, changed
 resistance, which thereby becomes a measure of flow. The electri-
 cal schematic of a constant current system is shown in Figure 2.

                      OUTPUT  OF AMPLIFIER
                               o
MANUAL
BALANCE
                 =s CONSTANT
                    OUTPUT
                             -10
                           ffl
                           lil
                           Q
                            •-20
                             -30
      X
   NON-LINEAR
   AMPLIFIER
  HOT
  WIRE
                           a.
                           •£.
                            -40
                             -50
                                  10'
                                10°         10
                              FREQUENCY (Hz)
           Figure 2.  Schematic of Constant Current System.
                                10

-------
The current to the sensor is maintained essentially constant by using
a large resistor in series with the sensor.  The current is selected
so the sensor is operated at the desired temperature in the environ-
ment  of interest.  If the heat transfer between the environment and
the sensor increases (due, for example,  to an increase in velocity)
the sensor will tend to cool with a resulting decrease in its resis-
tance. The major drawback of the constant current system is that
the frequency response of a sensor depends not only on sensor
characteristics, but also on flow characteristics.  The response
depends on both the thermal capacity of the sensor and the heat
transfer  coefficient between the sensor and its environment.  Since
the sensor response changes witjj changes in flow (changing the heat
transfer  coefficient), the frequency compensation of the amplifier
must  be readjusted whenever the mean flow changes.  This is not
practical for the sewer flow application.
The constant temperature type of compensating circuitry overcomes
the primary disadvantage just mentioned in the constant current
system by using a feedback loop.   Figure 3 depicts a constant
temperature system.  As the velocity past the sensor increases,
the sensor will tend to cool with a resulting decrease in the resis-
tance. This resistance decrease will cause the voltage to decrease;
thus,  changing the input to the amplifier.  The phase of the amplifier
is such that this decrease in voltage will cause an increase in the
output of the amplifier in order to increase the current through the
sensor.  The output of the constant temperature system is the
voltage output of the amplifier which in turn is the voltage required
to drive the necessary current through the sensor. Due to the
feedback action, the resistances in the bridge remain constant.  The
voltage across the bridge is directly proportional to the current
through the sensor and power is  equal to the current squared times
                               11

-------
 the resistance.  Therefore, the square of the voltage measured on top
 of the bridge is directly proportional to the instantaneous heat transfer
 between the sensor and its environment.
  BRIDGE
 VOLTAGE
  OUT
      CONTROL
      RESISTOR
                       I
-	1
                                           D-C  DIFFERENTIAL
                                             AMPLIFIER (G)
                                         SENSOR
         Figure 3.  Schematic of Constant Temperature System.
There are special considerations for hot-film sensors used in liquids
which greatly limit their application:

Contamination -The characteristics of combined sewer waste -
water will cause prohibitive contamination on the hot-film sensor
that would drastically change the heat transfer capability of the
film.  In turn, measured voltages would be unstable for a given
flow velocity and be inapplicable in terms of comparison to a
                              12

-------
previous calibration.  Oils,  greases,  and soaps contained in sewer
wastewater would be most detrimental to achieving stable measure-
ments.  They tend to coat the wetted surfaces of the sewer pipe by
congealing,  and in doing so on the sensor film, would cause a change
in the heat transfer characteristics of the film.  Dissolved gases in
the wastewater such as  carbon dioxide,  if near saturation levels,
will be driven out of solution by the heated sensor since saturation
levels decrease with increasing temperature.  Bubbles, thus formed
will cling to the sensor  surface and cause erratic heat transfer.
Water is the major component of  the sewer effluent and will undergo
electrolysis unless the hot film is completely insulated from the
water.  Electrolysis forms gas bubbles  and drives dissolved minerals
out of solution to deposit on the sensing  elements.  The grit content in
the combined sewer wastewater will greatly accelerate the break-
down of the  film insulation.  The  grit content is greatly increased
during storm runoff and therefore excessive wear would be
expected.

Temperature Changes - Since the operating temperature  of a
sensor in liquids is limited to the boiling point and more practically,
to an increase over the fluid temperature of  50 to 100°F, small temp-
erature changes can provide significant  errors with constant
temperature anemometer operation.  For example a 5°F change with
an overheat  of 50°F gives  about a 10 percent change in output.  In
gases where sensor temperature is  typically 400-500°F above the
fluid temperature,  small temperature changes are not so significant.
Hence, in liquids some method of temperature compensation is
important.  There  are means of achieving this but at added cost and
reduced reliability.
                              13

-------
SURVEY OF PAST APPLICATIONS OF HOT-FILM ANEMOMETRY
IN WATER
Ling (55) introduced the hot-film probe for use in liquid flows in 1956.
Since then a number of investigations have been carried out in liquids
with only a few being successful.  In most of these, the film was placed
away from the wall since its size can interfere with the detailed
measurements  required in the sub-layer region (43) and (53).  Indeed,
different configurations of film probes have produced very different
results within the same experiment even for the simple case  of meas-
uring velocity profiles in turbulent flows (44) and (22).
The one type of film probe that holds promise of being applied to
sewer flow is the flush mounted probe because the backing material
does not interfere with the flow field and has the best chances of
physical survival in the sewer environment.  Very little research has
been done to determine the feasibility of using flush mounted,  hot-film
sensors for quantitative measurements in water because the electrol-
ysis problem has only recently been solved through the use of quartz
coatings.  Townsin (45) demonstrated the use of the flush mounted
hot-film sensor to  detect laminar, transition,  and turbulent flow
fields along the hull of a ship model.  Similarly, Burns and Murphy
(46) used the same type of probe to investigate the effectiveness of
turbulence stimulation on ship models.   Rundstadler (30) used them
for studies of the viscous sublayer.  An attempt to calibrate them for
shear stress measurements was unsuccessful, however, because of the
low velocity and electronic drift problems.
Hot-film sensors have also been used for quantitative turbulence
measurements.   Dreyer (22) and Fabula (32) have also explored this
area using conical  and parabolic hot-film probes.  Geremia (26)
                                 14

-------
studied the flush mounted hot-film anemometer as a possible tool in
turbulence research and found it to be a powerful measuring device.
Mies (27)  studied the most effective way ol curve fitting hot-film
measurements made in an open channel for purposes of calibration.
Richardson and McQuivey (36) describe a method for measuring
turbulence in water which does not depend on filtering and the removal
of gases from the water.  The method is based on the discovery that
the change in the voltage/velocity relation by contamination of the
probe is the same as the change which occurs for an uncontaminated
probe when the overheat ratio is decreased.
Resch (38) made measurements of the relative intensity of turbulence
and energy spectra using a conical probe at the axis of a cylindrical
pipe.   The results of these measurements were compared with those
of other researchers in air and in dynamically similar flows.  The
comparison shows that measurements of turbulence can be carried out
in water with a comparable degree of accuracy to those carried out in
air.  Almost every investigator was concerned with contamination and
took careful measures  to filter or otherwise reduce the effects of this
problem.
Runstadler (30) gives a very concise  summary of the  factors that
significantly affect the  stable non-drift operation of hot-film  probes
in water.
Dirt Contamination - Lint, dirt particles,  and even particles micro-
scopic in  size can collect on the probe  or sensing element causing a
change in the heat transfer characteristics between the probe and
the fluid.
Dissolved Gases - Air  or other gases in saturation in the water may
come out of solution and collect on the probe or sensing element,
causing a  change in the heat transfer characteristics between probe
                                15

-------
and fluid.  This factor is enhanced when the probe is operated at
large overheats.
Chemical Impurities - Chemical impurities in the water such as
chlorine or similar halogens, may produce a  chemical reaction with
the film sensing element, and cause eroding of the metal film thus
producing a change in the electrical resistance and heat transfer
characteristics.  In addition,  hard water forms deposits on the probe
element that alter the heat transfer characteristics between the
probe and fluid.
Water Electrical Conductivity - A high electrical conductivity caused
by impure water  can lead to a low parallel resistance path through
the water relative to the resistance of the film,  thus  producing an
effective change in the resistance of the  sensing element.  An
important consideration in this regard is to minimize the leakage
current which can occur by using a thin protective coating.  This
has the adverse affect of reducing sensitivity  but is a necessity for
prolonged operation.  As yet, reliability has not been achieved in
coatings for prolonged operation.
Stray Electric or Magnetic Fields - Stray electric or magnetic fields
(stray electric  fields frequently occur in water channel flows) may
have an affect on the stable operation of  probes.  At present,  little
is known about  this factor.
Nucleate Boiling  - The probe must be operated at sufficiently low
values of overheat such that formation of water vapor caused by
nucleate boiling does not occur on the sensing element.
A number of factors pertaining to the construction and operation of
the probes are  also important through their affects on the factors
described in the preceding.
                                16

-------
Probe Shape - The shape of the probe can be important by providing
a probe form that is less susceptible to collecting dirt and more
readily sheds gas or vapor bubbles.
Electrode Surface Area -  The surface area of the electrode  should
be kept small and the location of the electrode on the probe should
provide the longest possible conduction path for leakage current flow.
Shielding of Electrodes - As previously mentioned, one way of pre-
venting electrolysis is by coating the electrode.  Experience has
shown however, that electrolysis may  occur  under the coating, pro-
ducing gas bubbles which can lead to an early breakdown of the
electrode material and coating.
Electrode Material - Experience has also shown that platinum sponge
material sometimes has a tendency to break down and decompose
after long use in water.  The effect is to produce an increase in the
electrical resistance of the probe.  Other materials used for films
are Tungsten, Nichol, and an alloy of Platinum (80%) arid Iridium
(20%).
In almost every report that was reviewed some mention of probe
contamination was made.   Careful filtering and deaerating techniques
were developed to have a test fluid that would not contaminate the
measuring probe and thus cause a calibration shift.  Needless to say,
investigation of other means of measuring velocity in the sewer was
begun when it became apparent that contamination was such a severe
limitation.
                                17

-------
SURVEY OF VENDORS OF HOT-FILM ANEMOMETERS

A list of all vendors contacted during the study (see Appendix A)

revealed that only three were actively in the business of manufacturing

hot-film and hot-wire anemometers and are:

DISA Electronics
779 Susquehanna Avenue
Franklin Lakes, New Jersey 07417
201-891-9460

Thermo-Systems,  Inc. (TSI)
2500 Cleveland Avenue, North
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55113

CGS/Datametrics
127 Coolidge Hill Road
Watertown, Massachusetts  02172
617-924-8505

These  companies were personally visited and interviewed with the

intent of establishing  the level of expertise and facilities dedicated to

this field and to obtain literature and personal opinions toward the

application of hot-film sensor for measuring sewer flow.  The results

of these meetings are contained in the next section.

Of these three companies, DISA and TSI are rated about equal in

expertise and facilities.  CGS did not appear to be as actively engaged

in this field as the other two companies.  TSI has all of its facilities

located in one location whereas DISA has manufacturing and assembly

plants  in Herlev, Denmark,  with sales and marketing located in

New Jersey.  Impressions made from conversations with anemometer

users and the literature survey indicate that both TSI and DISA

manufacture good quality equipment.

SURVEY OF TECHNICAL DISCUSSIONS

In order to obtain first-hand knowledge of the manufacturing techniques

ised in making  hot-film anemometers and to personally inspect the
                                18

-------
facilities of proposed vendors, it was felt necessary to visit the
respective companies.  This proved to be a very fruitful decision
not only from the fulfillment of the stated intent but many additional
sources of information were identified in terms of literature and
researchers as a result of the meetings.  In addition, professional
suggestions on the application of hot-film anemometry to measuring
sewer flow were obtained.  A survey of obtained information is pre-
sented in the following.
To protect the probe from abrasive wear, an extra thick industrial
coating will be required.  Sensitivity and frequency response will be
sacrificed for this addition.
Coatings are mostly sputtered quartz,  however,  teflon and zirconium
oxide have been experimentally tried with varying success.
Self-cleaning systems that have been examined are mechanical
scrubbers, excessive  overheating to burn off deposits, and ultrasonic
cleaning techniques.  Overheating is not practical for flush mounted
hot-films because of loss of heat to the substrate.  Mechanical
scribbers are not feasible because of the interference caused in the
flow and lack of repetitive cleaning ability over long periods of time.
Ultrasonic cleaning  is the most  promising; however, it would entail
a costly development with uncertain results.
Static pressure does not affect the calibration of the probe in water
(+2%) up to 1000 psi.

Calibration of probes in water is normally accomplished in an or if iced
free stream, jet, a towing tank,  or rotating tank of water.
The effect of using a larger sensor would be increased sensitivity
which means a heavier coating could  be applied; however, disadvan-
tages are increased  power requirements, reduced frequency response,
                                19

-------
thermal expansion problems, and increased stabilization time due to
the larger amount of substrate.
Probe operation in still air presents no problem when the overheat
ratio is set up for water.
If several probes and multiplexing is used, recommended stabilization
times were estimated anywhere from 0. 7 seconds to 15 minutes!
There is no existing past experience to indicate that activating for
short periods and deactivating for  long periods of time  would be
harmful.
The general independent consensus from all three manufacturers
after extensive questioning is that  no off-the-shelf probe now exists
that could be expected to work in a sewer environment for more than
hours or days  at the most.  The majority of applications for hot-film
anemometers are for basic fluid mechanics research under laboratory
type conditions.  There is some history of industrial application (pulp
slurries, power plant effluent) of hot-film sensors as one-shot
measurements.  Probe  longevity was very short in these instances.
The manufacturers are  anxious to  develop a reliable industrial type
probe for liquids  but a breakthrough in the near future is not
anticipated.
                               20

-------
                      SECTION V
             THERMAL WAVE FLOWMETER
            PRELIMINARY DESIGN CONCEPT
The thermal wave flowmeter correlates the time of flight of a thermal
wave between two fixed points to the average flow velocity in the pipe.
The basic sensor elements are depicted in Figure 4.  The thermal
wave in the fluid is generated by a heater element that is  heated with
a periodic voltage.  The flow passing over the heater transports the
wave downstream at some propagation velocity which is a function of
the average velocity in the pipe.  A thermistor element downstream
senses the passing of the thermal pulse.  An electronic counter is
triggered when the pulse is generated and stopped when the pulse is
sensed by the thermistor element.  The distance between the heater
and the thermistor, divided by the  propagation time measurement, then
determines the propagation velocity.
A separate stage measurement of the flow,  utilizing electrical conduction
techniques,  is used to complement the flow velocity measurement in order
to determine the volume flow rate.   This unit is comprised of two stain-
less steel rods molded into a rubber mold which is then mounted  in the
sewer pipe.
The flow measurement system incorporates five thermal  sensors mounted
on the periphery of the pipe.  The measurement of the average flow
velocity in the pipe is obtained by averaging the longitudinal propagation
velocities of the five thermal waves generated at the five  symmetric
peripheral positions.  The averaging technique will compensate for
irregular velocity profiles in the pipe caused by blockages,  closing of
valves,  etc., and will give an accurate means of evaluating the average
velocity.  Surface contamination which was severely detrimental to the
direct measuring hot-film anemometer technique will not affect the
thermal wave except in magnitude of signal which the measurement
                               21

-------
  HEAT PULSE TAKES TIME t TO
TRAVEL FROM HEATER TO
SENSOR
                             HEATER
                                          HEAT
                                         SENSOR
     Figure 4. General Sensor Configuration
                     22

-------
system does not rely on.  Of course there is a minimum signal
required such that signal-to-noise ratios are of sufficient level to
properly activate the data gathering electronics.
The electronic portion of the system is designed by utilizing inte-
grated circuits to monitor the thermistor signals from the sensor
blocks.  A correlator circuit is employed to derive the heater signal
waveform.  The sensor phase delayed outputs are then multiplexed
together with the time  of day and recorded.  A portable cassette
type recorder is used to record the  sensor data on-line for
approximately one week before a tape change is required.  The data
is recorded in a format that is adaptive to high speed data process-
ing.  The sampling of the volume flow rate is logically programmed
such that higher rates  are used during high flow conditions (i. e.,
during peak or storm conditions) and low sampling rates are used
during low flow conditions.
                               23

-------
                      SECTION VI
             HYDRAULIC CONSIDERATIONS
Hydraulic ally, the flow of wastewater in a sewer may be classified as
either open-channel or pressure-conduit flow.   The two kinds of flow
are similar in many ways but differ in one important respect.  Open-
channel flow must have a free surface, whereas pipe flow has none,
since the water must fill the whole conduit.  A free surface is subject
to atmospheric pressure.  Pressure-conduit or pipe flow, if cross
section is circular, exerts no direct atmospheric pressure but
hydraulic pressure only.
Sanitary sewers often are designed as open channels, that is, with a
free surface for ventilation reasons or to provide an additional factor
of safety.  However, some are designed to flow just full at peak design
flow, since there will be a free surface for ventilation at all lesser
flows.   There are many empirical methods to evaluate  the flow in a
sewer under various conditions.  Darcy-Weisbach,  Kutter,  Hazen-
Williams,  and the Manning formulas are all well known and utilized
for design  of sewer systems.  However, these formulae are empirical
in nature and, due to the local velocity distribution at a particular
measuring  station, cannot be relied upon to give accurate flow data.
For example,  local blockage may cause a high stage of low flow with
a much slower velocity than that predicted by the classic formulae.
Therefore,  in order to obtain an accurate responsive measurement
system, it  is necessary to measure both the average velocity in the
pipe and the stage of flow.  The volume flow is  then simply:
                        Q = VA                  (3)
where    Q  = volume flow rate
         V  = mean velocity of the flow cross section
        A  = flow cross sectional area which is a function of the stage
            of flow.
                               25

-------
The measurement of the average velocity is indeed the most difficult
task in the development of an accurate flow meter.  Because of the
solids contained in combined sewer flow, it is imperative that nothing
interfere with the cross section of the flow; otherwise the physical
longevity would be very short.
Owing to the presence of a free surface,  friction along the pipe wall,
and local blockage,  the velocities in a channel are not uniformly
distributed in the channel section.   The velocity distribution in a
channel section depends also on other factors, such as the shape of
the cross section, the roughness of the channel, presence of bends,
and presence of other pipe connections in the vicinity.  The measured
maximum velocity in open channels usually appears to occur below the
free surface at a distance of 0. 05 to 0. 25 of the  depth. In a broad,
rapid,  and shallow stream or in a very smooth channel,  the maximum
velocity may often be found at the free surface.  The roughness of the
channel will cause the curvature of the vertical-velocity  distribution
curve to increase.  On a bend,  the velocity increases greatly  at the
convex side,  owing  to the centrifugal action of the flow.  Laboratory
investigations have  found that flow in straight prismatic channels is
in fact three dimensional manifesting a spiral motion,  although the
velocity component  in the transverse channel section is usually small
and insignificant compared with the longitudinal  velocity  components
(58), (59), (60),  (62).
As a result of the previous discussion, the implied requirement in
making an average flow measurement in  an open channel is that
several measurements must be made which correlate to  various
portions  of the cross sectional flow area.  These measurements can
then be averaged and correlated to the mean flow rate in the pipe.
                               26

-------
The present measurement system is composed of several longi-
tudinal velocity measurements at the periphery of the pipe which,
when averaged, will correlate to the mean velocity of the flow cross
section.  A separate device to measure the stage of flow will then
provide the necessary measurements for determining the volume
flow rate.
                              27

-------
                       SECTION VII
 RESULTS OF PRELIMINARY LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS
          UTILIZING THERMAL WAVE FLOWMETER
In order to gather experimental data utilizing the concept of the
thermal wave flowmeter, it was agreed between EPA and HCI to
extend the time of Phase I.  During that time,  HCI fabricated and
tested sensor blocks for a 1-inch and 2-inch I. D. pipe.  Average
flow velocities in the 1-inch I. D. pipe ranged from 1. 0 to 5. 5 ft/sec
or Reynolds numbers from 6850 to 37, 700.  Average flow velocities
in the 2-inch pipe ranged from  0. 5 to 1. 6 ft/sec, or Reynolds num-
bers from 6850 to 21, 900.  The purpose of the experiments was to
determine the characteristics of the thermal wave flowmeter as a
function of average flow velocity, peripheral position in the pipe and
pipe diameter.   Measures of evaluation are  in terms of  sensitivity
and repeatability.
Sensitivity is defined as the ratio of the thermal wave propagation
velocity to the average fluid velocity in the flow  cross section.
The Sensitivity of the 2-inch I. D. pipe data was approximately 70
times greater than that for the  1-inch pipe (0. 035 compared with
0. 0005).  Thus,  the thermal wave propagation velocity increases
0. 035 ft/sec for every increase of 1 ft/sec in average flow velocity
in the 2-inch pipe.  The model  test data demonstrated a need for
improved sensitivity and reduction in scatter,  which should be
available  in the full scale model with the proposed full scale design.
The basic sensor block used in  the experiments, depicted in
Figure  5,  was flush mounted on the periphery of the pipe. The
thermal wave in the fluid was generated by a nichrome wire that
                              29

-------
 V,"-
                  H
              l7/32
                          COMPENSATING THERMISTORS
                          HEATER
                          SENSING THERMISTOR
                                          I  R
Figure 5.  Model Test Sensor Block.
                30

-------
was heated periodically.  The thermal wave was sensed by a
thermistor whose distance,  d, from the heater was fixed and
accurately known.   The heater temperature was raised approx-
imately 80  C which causes approximately a 1° C  rise in the water
passing over the downstream sensor.   The time of flight of the
thermal wave when divided into the separation distance, d, deter-
mines the value of the local propagation velocity.
Figure 6 depicts the hydraulic apparatus used to conduct the experi-
ment.  Both  the 1-inch LD. pipe and 2-inch I. D.  pipe were used
during the tests.  Average velocity was measured with a Fischer
Porter No. 102732 lab rotameter with fluid velocity being maintained
with a constant head supply.  The magnitude of flow velocity was
controlled by a series of valves  as shown.  The sensor block was
flush mounted in the tube approximately 6-inches  from the reservoir
end such that pipe entrance affects were negligible and fully devel-
oped turbulent flow existed over the sensor block.
The assembled instrumentation is  indicated in Figure 7.  Two
thermistor beads and a nichrome wire heater were assembled into
an aluminum block with the spacing indicated on Figure 5.  The heater
was supplied with a varying amplitude power wave whose frequency
was determined by a low frequency oscillator. The driving frequency
was varied initially to determine the best signal-to-noise ratio.   All
test data were taken at 0. 5 Hz by utilizing a square wave voltage
into the heater.  A thermistor bridge with a temperature compen-
sating network was installed in the sensor block.  A preamplifier
to provide a high level signal was connected to the output of the
sensor network and the  signal fed to the filter network.  The
output of the filter was fed to a zero crossing detector and a square
                              31

-------
       CONSTANT  HEAD SUPPLY
   1-- i.O.PVC PIPE
FISCHER PORTER
NO.102732 LAB
ROTAMETER
CAPACITY
2.8-35.6PM
                                                                    SENSOR BLOCKS
                                                                (5°6"FROM PIPE ENTRANCE)
                                                                           -   GATE VALVE
                                       MAXIMUM VELOCITY = 6 FT/SEC.
                                                                           RESERVOIR
                        Figure 6.  Model Test Hydraulic Apparatus

-------

LOW
FREQUENCY
OSCILLATOR
I

i

                                                   HEATER
co
GO
                                                    THERM

                                                    SENSOR
                                                                                PERIOD
                                                                                COUNTER
                                                   SHARER
                            Figure 7.  Experimental Instrumentation for Model Flow Tests.

-------
wave is generated with a duty cycle proportional to the time between
the positive going zero crossing of the heater and the sensor.  A
counter was used to determine the time-of-flight of the thermal wave.
Each data point was derived from averaging ten consecutive readings
from the counter.
TEST RESULTS
The test results are contained in Figures  8 through 14.  The graphs
plot the thermal wave propagation velocity versus the average or
mean flow velocity in the pipe.  The curves were determined by
using a least squares  curve fit.  The following observations are
made concerning the graphs.
1.   The sensitivity for the 1-inch I. D.  pipe data is very low
(0.0005).
2.   The sensitivity of  the 2-inch I. D.  pipe data is approximately 70
times greater than the 1-inch pipe data (0. 035).
3.   Data from various peripheral positions appeared very similar;
that is the flow appeared axisyrnmetric.
4.   Inserting a flow wedge ahead of the sensor block in the 1-inch I. D.
pipe increased the thermal propagation velocity by a factor of two
but did not change the sensitivity appreciably.
5.   Inserting a flow wedge ahead of the sensor block in the 2-inch
I. D. pipe did not appreciably affect the thermal wave propagation
velocity but lowered the sensitivity from 0. 035 to 0. 02.
DISCUSSION OF TEST RESULTS
The graphs of the flow data clearly indicate the ability of the thermal
wave concept to measure average flow velocity, but,  at the same time
illustrate some unknown elements in the present model test configur-
ation.  The following  is concluded  from the test results.
                               34

-------
              H.030
              t .029
              O

              3

                 .028
              Z
              O
                 .027
en
              o >026
              a:
              o.

              uj -025



                . .024
               £E
               UJ
               X
0
                                           _L
                                 _L
  234

MEAN VELOCITY (FT./SEC)
                                 Figure 8.  Thermal Wave Velocity Versus Mean Velocity for the

                                           Sensor Block on the Side of a 1 -inch I. D. Pipe.

-------
             o
             LU
CO
                .030
             O .029
             O
               .028
                .027
            Q.
            UJ .026
            cr
            CL

            It1 .025
               .024  -
            QC
            UJ
            I
                                                                   O
   234

MEAN VELOCITY (FT/SEC)
                                    ure 9»  Thermal Wave Velocity Versus Mean Velocity for the
                                           Sensor Block on Bottom of 1-inch I. D. Pipe.

-------
CO
              I-
              U.
              O
              o
  .030 -


  .029


  .028
9. .027

<
CD
< .026
O
oc
              LU
                .024
              QL
              UJ
              X
       o
234

MEAN VELOCITY ( FT/SEC)
                                Figure 10.  Thermal Wave Velocity Versus Mean Velocity for
                                           Sensor Block on Top of 1-inch I. D.  Pipe.

-------
CO
                  .070
               O
               UJ
               CO
               \
               h-
.060
               O
               O

               UJ
.050
               < .040
               Q.
               o
               cr
               a.

               LJ


                  .030
               cc
               LJ
               X
                                            _L
                                      _L
_L
                                 0.25
                          0.5        0.75        1.00

                               MEAN VELOCITY ( FT/SEC)
           1.25
1.50
                                   Figure 11.  Thermal Wave Velocity Versus Mean Velocity for
                                              Sensor Block on Side of 2 -inches I. D, Pipe.
1.75

-------
CO
CD
                  .07 -
                O
                Id
                (S)
                   .06
                O
                O
                _1
                UJ
.05
                g.04
                0.
                O
                tr
                a.
                UJ
                >
                < .03
                ££.
                UJ
                X
                H-
   T
                                0.25
                         0.5         0.75        1.0

                            MEAN VELOCITY ( FT/SEC)
1.25
1.50
1.75
                                 Figure 12.  Thermal Wave Velocity Versus Mean Velocity for
                                             Sensor Block on Bottom of 2 -inches I. IX  Pipe.

-------
   .07
UJ .06
CO
O
O
_l
UJ
g  -04
o
cc
Q_

UJ

^  -03  -
cc
UJ
X
h-
      0
                                                                             o
0.25
              Figure 13.
0.5         0.75        1.00

  MEAN  VELOCITY (FT/SEC)
1.25
1.50
1.75
          Thermal Wave Velocity Versus Mean Velocity for Sensor
          Block on Side of 2-inches I. D. Pipe With Wedge.

-------
LJ -065
O .060
O
_1
LJ
o

<  .055
e>

CL
o
cc.
a.

>  .050
<
o:
UJ
i
                  8
      H
       0
                  1           23456

                             MEAN  VELOCITY (FT/SEC)


                  Figure 14.  Thermal Wave Velocity Versus Mean Velocity for Sensor

                            Block on Side of 1-inch Pipe With Wedge.

-------
to
           .07
         O
         UJ
           .05
         _J
         UJ
         < .04
         Q.
         O
         01
         a.

         UJ
cc
!£ .02

I-    J~

     T.
     0
       2" I.D. PIPE

   BOTTOM, /S,DE
                         0.5
1.0
           SENSOR ON SIDE OF
           2" PIPE WITH WEDGE
                                                                                           SENSOR ON SIDE OF
                                                                                           l"PIPE  WITH WEDGE
                                            I.D.PIPE JTOP
                                                     1 BOTTOM
                                                      SIDE
                                                 _L
                                  _L
  1.5          2.0         2.5

MEAN  VELOCITY (FT/SEC)
                                                                          3.0
3.5
4.0
                                      Figure 15.  Thermal Wave Velocity Versus Mean Velocity
                                                 for all Configurations.

-------
1.  Due to the flush mounting of the sensor block, the sensitivity of the
thermal wave propagation velocity to the average velocity in the pipe is
very low  (0. 0005 in 1-inch pipe and 0. 035  in 2-inch pipe).
2.  The experimental data collected with the present model test
configuration in the 1-inch pipe would not be satisfactory for measuring
fluid velocity if similar results were to be obtained in the full scale
system.  This is due to the low sensitivity and the scatter in the data
points.  It appears that when the sensor is flush mounted, there is a
limiting value of the thermal wave propagation velocity as the average
velocity in the pipe is increased.  This is believed to be caused by the
steepness of the velocity profile at the wall caused by the viscous
friction.  Another problem of the  data taken thus far is the amount of
scatter in the thermal wave propagation velocity for a constant average
velocity.,  The variation is believed to be caused by  the inherent stretching
and contracting of the wave as it moves  down the pipe and thermal noise.
Discrete measurements,  therefore, would indicate  considerable scatter.
3.  It is postulated that the change in sensitivity between the 1-inch I. D.
pipe and 2-inch I. D= pipe was due to variance in the relative placement
of the sensor block in the pipe.  This is believed to  be true because of
the steepness  of the velocity profile near the wall and the non-consistent
effects  caused by using the flow wedge.
Although the test model data results are not encouraging from the aspect
of sensitivity and scatter, they do validate the concept of using  this
technique  to measure flow velocity in water „  Other investigators
(66)  are developing a similar technique to be used in air with
a great deal of success.   They also have concluded  that it is not affected
by contamination and has  no moving parts.  The application of the
technique  in water has problems which are coming to light as a result
of the past experiments, but,  it is believed that with further develop-
ment these deficiencies can be corrected.

                                43

-------
                       SECTION VIE
             DETAILED PROTOTYPE DESIGN
The experimental model test data showed that improvement would
have to be realized in the full scale configuration in terms of sensi-
tivity and scatter.   The problem  of increasing sensitivity is best
solved by generating the heat in faster fluid streamlines, in order
that the thermal wave velocity is  more responsive to changes in the
average flow velocity.   This can be achieved by using a sensor block
that is configured as shown  in Figure 16.  Mounting the heater and
sensor on the upstream side of the arc where the fluid streamlines
are compressed means that the local flow must speed up in order to
pass the volume of fluid that is flowing between adjacent streamlines.
The protrusion into the flow is  small, 0. 5-inch, but should signifi-
cantly increase the sensitivity of  the measurement.  The problem of
scatter is caused by the turbulent nature of the flow and noise that is
superimposed on the response signal.  A correlation of the input
heater signal to the thermistor response signal is proposed to pro-
vide a moving average type  reading of the thermal velocity and there-
fore reduce the effect of any discrete flow velocity measurement.
The measuring system will  utilize five thermal sensor blocks
mounted at 30  intervals as shown in Figure 17.   The detailed instal-
lation is depicted on HRC Drawing No. 71320002.  The sensor block
(HRC Drawing No. 71320003) is composed of an anodized aluminum
block whose exposed surface has  a 6-inch radial arc with a 5-inch
chord length, and is fastened to the sewer pipe.   The  protrusion into
the flow from the pipe wall is 0. 5 inches. The temperature compen-
sating thermistors, heater strip,  and thermal wave sensing
thermistors are flush mounted  on the upstream side of the arc.
This configuration should provide greater sensitivity because of
                               45

-------
  FLUID
 VELOCITY
CD
     SEWER
      WALL
                                  SEWER LONGITUDINAL CENTERLINE
                     TEMPERATURE  COMPENSATION
                             THERMISTOR
                                             HEATER
                                                        SENSING THERMISTOR
                                              5.0'
SEWER RADIUS
                                          \   -   - -        -      -
                               Figure 16.  Full Scale Sensor Block in Cross-Section

-------
           ELECTRONIC CABLING
           TO POWER AND RECORDING
           ELECTRONICS
                                                                                       SEWER PIPE
                                                                                       DIAMETER = 2'
                                                                                       OR GREATER
SENSOR
BLOCKS
                                                 SEMI-CIRCULAR    -
                                                 STAGE MEASURING
                                                 STRIP
FLOW VELO
SEMI-CIRCULAR
MEASURING STRIP
                               BOTTOM
                         Figure 17.  Proposed Sewer Pipe Installation of Flow Measurement System

-------
the compression of the fluid streamlines as the flow passes over the
sensor block.  The sensor blocks are approximately 1-3/4-
inches wide and are interconnected by a flexible epoxy strip of
the same geometrical cross section.  The epoxy strip serves as
the electrical conduit for the sensor power and response signals and
is also required for forming the strip to the inside shape of the pipe.
Manufacturing of the strip assembly entails making a mold of the
proper cross sectional shape and length.   Each sensor block will
be pre-assembled, wired  and placed in the mold, and then the
epoxy compound will be poured into the mold and allowed to cure.
The final assembly will thus be one integral composite strip with
the sensor blocks molded  in place.  The sensor blocks, themselves,
can economically be  made from 12-inch schedule 40 pipe segments.
The height measuring system utilizes an electronic liquid level gauge
which is manufactured by  Marsh and McBurney, Inc.  The liquid level
gauge consists of two solid rods, formed to fit the inside curvature
of the sewer pipe.  One rod is driven by an electrical signal, and
the other rod acts  as a variable tap,  whose output varies as a func-
tion of water level.  The sensor portion of the instrument, normally
a linear device when used as a  straight probe, provides a non-linear
output when curved to fit the conduit.  This non-linearity is
corrected by the data processing to be employed.  The overall instru-
ment is capable of accuracies better than 1% of full  scale.  The
installation layout  in the sewer pipe is depicted in HRC Drawing
No. 71320004.  The rods are imbedded in a faired strip similar to
that used for the flow velocity sensor strip and fastened to the inside
periphery of the pipe.  All electrical leads are brought out of the
strips at the top and  conduited to the location of the recording and
power electronics  which will be located either in a  man-hole space
                               48

-------
in an instrumentation shack adjacent to a manhole access.  The
sensors employed to monitor the heat pulse are thermistors that
have been installed in the transducer block previously discussed.
Thermistors rather than the hot film probes are employed because
of their glass coating (longer life) and lower cost.  The size of the
thermistors selected provides a small enough time constant to
enable the unit to respond to the 0. 5 Hertz heat pulse rate.  The
thermistors have been electrically connected in series with an
equal number placed geometrically parallel and upstream from the
heater element for temperature compensation.  By connecting the
sensors in series, a sensing bar is formed which is parallel to the
heating element.  The bridge amplifiers employed are of the servo
type with the temperature compensating elements enabling the
sensitivity to remain independent of the liquid temperature.  The
signals are connected from the bridge amplifiers to the correlator
circuits via the automatic gain  control amplifiers.  These ampli-
fiers provide a constant signal  to the correlators while the  input
signals vary over a range of a hundred to one.
The correlator circuitry employed is one which has recently been
developed around the multiplying electronic elements now available.
This circuitry is expected to produce signals which, over a period of
60 seconds,  will produce a signal which is ten to one hundred times
the level of the background noise.  The signal fed to the heater
element is an offset  square-wave at a rate of 0. 5 Hertz.  The sensors
produce a half sine pulse whose peak is delayed in time by the interval
required for  the  thermal pulse  to travel the pre-set distance between
the heater element and the sensor bar.  At the sensor bar,  the signal
noise is a result of the water turbulence plus the stretching and con-
tracting of the thermal wave.  The correlator provides an average of
                               49

-------
these random events resulting in their self-cancellation.  The
shortest path thermal wave, however,  is repetitious and therefore
reinforces itself.  The outputs of the correlators,  which serve as
long term averagers, are fed to voltage controlled phase shifters.
These devices provide for scale expansion of the output signals.  The
signals  are then sent to a period counter for display and digitizing.
A multiplexer is then employed to sequentially monitor the sensor
outputs  and the  stage height.  The digitized outputs are stored on a
digital cassette recorder along with the time  of day of the measure-
ment.  The digital cassette recorder provides for the maximum
accuracy while  employing a logic scheme enabling more data to be
acquired while the sewer flow is rising than at times of minimal flow.
The stage of flow measurement is also recorded by digitizing the
height gauge signal.
By recording the signals in this manner, the  maximum flexibility in
data processing can be obtained.  Chart recordings or deviation
measurements of the data can be obtained from any data processing
center.  Other methods  of recording the data, remote  monitoring or
chart recordings can be employed as desired. The details of the
circuitry employed can  be obtained from the  design drawing package
supplied with this report.  The electrical circuits can be traced by
reviewing Drawing No.  71320010 entitled, "Block Diagram Flow
Measuring System".
                               50

-------
                        SECTION IX
        PRELIMINARY FLOWMETER CALIBRATION
Prior to the insertion of the flowmeter into a sewer for data collec-
tion, a calibration of the unit was accomplished.  In order to attempt
a calibration on a meter such as this, designed to monitor the flow
velocity in the boundary layer region of both open and pressurized
flow,  it becomes necessary to deviate from a simple primary
standard insertion test.  No sewer test channels were identified
having high volume flow capability and accurate flow monitoring.
A test to determine the flow characteristics of the sensor and the
accuracy and repeatability of the'electronic measurement instrument-
ation was then undertaken.  A large volume water tank with an
extremely accurate flow rate and wide dynamic range  was identified
at the Naval Research  and Development Center at Carderock,
Maryland.  A contract was arranged with this facility  for the use of
a carriage in an 1800-foot towing channel for one day.   Accuracy of
the  towing carriage was identified to be at least 0. 02 foot/second.
Rigging to enable the quick insertion of a towing strut  was also found
to be available.  It was therefore decided to attempt to configure the
sensor as a member of a towing strut.  The perils of this decision
were identified as being the different type boundary  layer configur-
ations which were likely to be encountered when the sensor block
was removed from the concrete wall surface of the sewer pipe.  An
examination of the hydraulic design parameters indicated that quick
data checks would be required to ensure the expected turbulent
boundary layer configuration exists over the one to ten feet/second
flow range.
Since  the instrument presently employs a long term averaging
device to smooth its readings, it was also determined that the full
                               51

-------
range of flows could not be investigated due to the limited time that
a constant flow can be maintained.  A range of 4 to 5 feet/second
was identified as the limit to obtain readings from the  calibration
test.
Even with the limitation described previously,  it was decided
that a full scale test of limited range would provide more
working knowledge than a scaled one with full dynamic range;
so, the tests were conducted.  The calibration data are summa-
rized in Figure 18.  To acquire the curve as shown on Figure 18,
it was necessary to utilize a sand strip one-half inch wide
taped to the leading edge of the strut in front of the sensor block.
This mechanism causes the  laminar flow of the strut to be turbulent
at even the low flow speeds  and thus avoids the transitional flow
encountered in the one to two feet/second flow ranges as determined
without the sand strip.   The time required for equipment set up and
making initial data runs to determine the presence of fully developed
turbulent flow for all data flow rates resulted in the inability to
obtain summary data points,  as were desired,  due to the limited
total time available.
The plan was to first acquire data on the re-calibrated sensor/
electronic unit, and then to gather data at flow rates under one foot
per second on the other unit.  However, sufficient time was not
available to allow the second data set to be obtained.
Checks after the day of calibration revealed proper operation of the
second sensor's electronics, but a combination of two  dynamic adjust-
ments was required to affect a change in the range, and the necessary
test equipment was  not available at the test site.  The  sensor electron-
ics used to acquire  the data  were re-calibrated the day after the
test, and the results are presented in Table 1 and Figure 19.
                               52

-------
            Table 1. Instrument Electrical Calibration
1
Input Signal
Phase Shift
(m sec)
502
527
556
584
612
645
661
684
2
Delay Correction
for Heater Output
-400 m sec
102
127
156
184
212
245
261
284
3
Flowmeter Output
Reading
(m sec)
65
116
190
276
361
511
591
716
Columns 2 and 3 have been curve fitted by a least squares method


and the following equation determined:

                                           1 433
         Thermal Pulse - 16.4
                               fmeter read
                                (m sec)
                               \


An index of determination of 0. 998 was obtained for this data.
                               53

-------
o
0)
CO
rt
O
4.5.



4.0



3.54-


3.0
o    2. 5
S>   2.0
oJ
1.5. -



1.0 . .



0.5
                                                        i   I   i  t
                         200
                              300   400   500 600 TO 800 9001030
                             Flowmeter Readout (m sec)


             The above curve is fitted by a least squares method and provides the

             following equation:

                                         1077
             Flowmeter Readout =
                                 Average Flow Velocity
                                       (ft/sec)
                                                  - 154.6
                             Figure IB,  Calibration Data
                                           54

-------
o
CD
cc
§
a;
Q
d
bn
•i-i
ra
      400
      300 • -
250
      200
     150 +
     100 - -
                  -t-
                  100
                                        4-
H-
 600
                                                                  700
               200      300      400      500


             Flowmeter Readout (m sec)  (X axis)


Data obtained from Number 2 phase shifter using counter readout.


Electrical insert signal calibration provides the following equation:



                        y = 16.4 .X°-433


y, and X are axis as indicated.
                         Figure 19.  Electrical Calibration Data
                                         55

-------
It should be noted that the phase shift data were provided by
electronic test instrumentation as an insert calibration.
Data containing a two-step settling time was observed during the
data gathering.   The second step of the data provided a regular and
repeatable calibration curve which had been predicted.  The second
step response in the settling time however was not anticipated and had
not been revealed by any of the electronic calibrations.  Therefore,
it is concluded that the thermal plume must be undergoing a transi-
tion at some point in the steady flow conditions.  At the present time
this mechanism is not clearly understood, but it is felt that it could
possibly be attributed to the special strut used in the  calibration but
which would not be found in a sewer installation.
In order to better  understand this phenomenon and also to gather
data on the uniformity of the ratio of measured flow velocity to
average free stream velocity for different sensor blocks, it is  recom-
mended that a pre-demonstration test be conducted under controlled
conditions.  This will also provide a true calibration  of the entire
flowmeter.  The conformance of the data to a smooth and predictable
curve shape is very encouraging.  The variation in the plume delay
from the calculated values indicates that the streamlined shape of
the sensor block is enabling the heat plume to penetrate further
into the flow stream than had been anticipated.   This would indi-
cate an improvement over the performance previously anticipated
by this measurement technique.  The calibration curves were
obtained by performing  a least squares fit to the data points.  An
index of determination of better than 0. 99 was obtained for each of
the curves.  Data points for the meter readout calibration were
selected from the total data required on the basis of on site observa-
tions regarding the validity of each data point.   The curves as shown
                               56

-------
appear to be valid; however, more detailed data are required before
it can be stated with complete certainty that this  unit is calibrated
and can acquire data in a sewer flow.
                                57

-------
                             SECTION X
                FULL SCALE TEST SITE SELECTION
The discussions which HCI  has had with area sanitary commissions have
revealed many suitable installation sites.  The parties contacted requested
the submission of approved  design and fabrication drawings prior to the
finalization of the site.  Agreement as to the facilities required centered
about a sewer with a large dynamic flow rate and easily accessible man-
holes.  The addition of a small instrument shack next to the sewer
installation is considered a  requirement in order that a protective enclosure
for the instruments and electrical power could be provided.

A review of the available test sites revealed many operational difficulties;
however, the selected test site has more advantageous features than any
other site reviewed.
The selected test site is located in Fairfax County, Virginia,  along the
Scott's Run watershed just off Georgetown Pike (Route 193), about one-
half mile north of the Interstate 495 interchange.  The manhole access
is in a park area approximately 200 yards from Route 193.  The sewer
line is 24-inches in diameter and has a flow variation from 0. 6 to 2. 2
million gallons per day.   The sewer is  a sanitary line; however,  infil-
tration during heavy rains is evident.
The main advantage of this  site is its close proximity to a meter vault
containing  a 9-inch Parshall flume which has been recently calibrated
and is constantly monitored.  It is planned to install the HCI  flowmeter
50 feet downstream from the meter vault where access through a shallow
manhole is available.  Cabling can be run through the pipe to the meter
vault  where the instrumentation could be securely located.  Power is
already available at the meter vault which is enclosed by  a barbed-wire
fence.  The site is also far  enough from residential connections that
blockage of the pipe can  easily be made without fear of flooding base-
ments,  etc.
                                59

-------
The main disadvantage of the proposed site is the lack of dynamic
flow range.  Table 2 summarizes the hydraulic characteristics of
the proposed sewer line based on:  1)  flow data from the existing
Parshall flume; 2) a recorded pipe slope of 1. 4%; and 3) a
Manning friction factor of 0. 013.  Table 2 shows that the expected
range in flow velocity is from 3. 36 to 4. 86 feet per second.   The
flow stage range is from 3. 48 inches to 6. 75 inches.  Visual in-
spection during peak flow conditions indicate stage height of about
12 inches.
The proposed site is under the jurisdiction of the  Fairfax County
Division of Sanitation who has been most cooperative in helping
HCI locate a suitable site.   Other sites having more dynamic flow
conditions have been inspected; however,  it is proposed that the
first installation be made at Scott's Run where a calibrated
standard is  available.  If the flow measurement system proves
to be successful at this site, then a second installation could be
made in a more dynamic sewer line.
Blueprints of the proposed site are available for inspection at HCI.
The sewer line empties into the  Potomac interceptor line on the
Maryland side of the Potomac River.
                                60

-------
               Table 2.  Scott's Run Hydraulic Characteristics
Scott's Run Hydraulic Data --
   Pipe Diameter           =  24 inches
   Pipe Slope               =  0. 014
   Minimum Flow          =  0. 6 million gallons/day
                                        6      '   y    Data for Oct. 1971
   Maximum Flow          =  2.2 million gallons/day
   Assumption for Manning  =  0. 013
   Roughness Coefficient
Full Pipe Flow Characteristics --
   Flow Capacity =  18 million gallons/day
   Flow Velocity =  8.4 ft/sec
Open Channel Characteristics--
   A.  Minimum Flow
       1 •  Q/Qf = 0. 6/18  = . 0333
       2.  d/D  =  .145 or stage =  3.48 inches
       3.  V/Vf = 0.4 or V= 3.36 ft/sec
   B.  Maximum Flow
       1.  Q/Qf = 2.2/18 =  .122
       2.  d/D  =  0. 281 stage = 6. 75 inches
       3.  V/Vf - 0. 578 V = 4. 86 ft/sec
                                      61

-------
                         SECTION XI
         FULL SCALE FLOWMETER CALIBRATION
Since the previous calibration of the strut mounted sensor blocks
had left many unanswered questions, it was determined that an
additional calibration was required. The Fluids Laboratory at
the National Bureau of Standards was selected as the test facility.
A 16-inch pipe was the flow channel to  be employed.   The belt
assembly to be installed in the  sewer site was modified and in-
stalled within a pipe section.  In addition, the strut was mounted
as a center chord of the pipe downstream from the belt sensors.
The details of the test plan and the data gathered are delineated
in Appendix D.   In addition, a new insert electrical calibration
was accomplished. The electrical calibration data is presented
in Appendix D.
A review of the data gathered has produced  some insight to the
operation of the unit and its various components.  A calibration
curve relating unit readout to the average stream velocity has not
been included.  The reason for this omission is that the amount of
variation in the data results in  a lack of precision of the measured
water velocity.  The instrument readout variation was traced and
analyzed after the calibration.  The first property of the belt to
cause concern was the extremely low signal levels present at high
water velocities.  A logarithmic variation in the peak-to-peak  strength
at the sensor bridge was observed.  A value approximating
2X10"6°C peak-to-peak was observed during a 14 feet/second
precalibration test.  The observed velocity  data exhibited a wide
variation of flow velocity in the region of the measurement.  These
                                 63

-------
observations imply that under steady flow boundary layer veloci-
ties exhibit variations which do not revolve about a constant value
as previously postulated,  but rather have an even distribution
over a range in values.  The unit as constructed was able to
handle the extremely low temperature signals, but the manner
of the boundary layer velocity changes do not enable the correlator
circuitry to achieve a unique answer.
The instrument as configured does provide an indication of  flow.
If the sensor belt portion of the unit were installed in a situation
in which the boundary layer of the flow was stabilized, then a
repetitive indication of the flow could be attained.   Additional
investigations into the mechanisms controlling the flow over the
heater to sensor region of flow would be required  if this approach
to fluid flow is to be pursued.
                               64

-------
                        SECTION XII
                  ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Mr.  George Kirkpatrick of the Environmental Protection Agency for
his technical guidance and sponsorship.
Dr. H. R.  Thacker,  the Environmental Protection .Agency, who
served as the technical project officer, for his cooperation and tech-
nical guidance.
Mr.  Harry Torno of the Environmental Protection Agency for his
technical guidance.
The cooperation of Dr. John Geremia from the United States  Naval
Academy, Mr.  Ronald Humphrey from DISA Electronics,  and
Drs. John Olin  and Leroy Fingerson from Thermo-Systems,  Inc.
in providing technical information relating to the hot-film  anemometry.
                               65

-------
                        SECTION XIII
                        'REFERENCES
VENDOR LITERATURE
1.  DISA Information No. 2 - July 1965, Issued by DISA Elektronik
    A/S, Herlev,  Denmark.
    1-A.   The Hot-Wire Anemometer at Low Air Velocities.
    1-B.   The Air Jet Hot-Wire Microphone.
    1-C.   Stresses and Deformations in Hot-Wire Probes
    1-D.   Micromanipulative Apparatus for Delicate Hot-Wire
           Probe Repair
    1-E.   Flush-Mounted Probes.
    1-F.   A Capacitance - Type Transducer for Absolute Measurements
           of Displacements.
2.  DISA Information No. 4 - December 1966, Issued by DISA
    Elektronik A/S, Herlev, Denmark,
    2-A.   Time Resolution Power in Correlation Measurements with
           DISA Type 66A01 Hot-Wire  and Hot-Film Anemometers.
    2-B.   Measurement of Amplitude and Phase Characteristics.
    2-C.   Application of Modulated Electromagnetic Waves for
           Measurement of the Frequency Response of Heat- Transfer
           Transducers.
    2-D.   Measuring Gas-Dynamic Parameters.
    2-E.   Pulsating Oil Burners.
                              67

-------
3.   DISA Information No. 5 - June 1967, Issued by DISA Elektronik
    A/S, Herlev, Denmark.
    3-A.   The Hyperbolic Response of Capacitive Transducers, and
           Linearizing by Means of an Electronic Circuit.
    3-B.   Hot-Wire Anemometer Calibration at High Subsonic Speeds.
    3-C.   The Air Bubble Problem in Water Flow Hot-Film
           Anemometry.
4.   DISA Information No. 6 - February 1968, Issued by DISA
    Elektronik A/S,  Herlev, Denmark.
    4-A.   Low Frequency Characteristics of Hot-Film Anemometers.
    4-B.   The Shock Front Curvature in a Shock Tube Measured with
           Hot-Wire Anemometers.
5,   DISA Information No. 7 - January 1969, Issued by DISA Elektronik
    A/S, Herlev, Denmark.
    5-A.   The Measurement of Turbulent Velocity Fluctuations and
           Turbulent Temperature Fluctuations in the Supercritical
           Region by a Hot-Wire Anemometer and a "Cole" Wire
           Resistance Thermometer.
    5>-B.   On Some Measurements Made by Means of a Hot Wire in a
           Turbulent Flow Near a Wall.
    5-C.   Effect of Wire Mounting System on Hot-Wire Probe Char-
           acteristics.
    5-D.   Pressure Transducers in Liquid-Filled Pressure Systems.
                              68

-------
6.   DISA Information No. 8 - July 1969,  Issued by DISA Elektronik
    A/S, Herlev, Denmark.
    6-A.   The X Hot-Wire Probe in a Plane Flow Field.
    6-B.   Measurement of Air Movements in Internal Combustion
           Engine Cylinders.
    6-C.   Some Problems Concerning the Analytical Evaluation of the
           Characteristics of Hot-Wires Immersed in a Fluid of Variable
           Pressures and Temperatures.
    6-D.   Equipment for Traversing Anemometer Probes.
7.   DISA Information No. 9 - February 1970, Issued by DISA Elektronik
    A/S, Herlev, Denmark.
    7-A.   Calibration of Probes for Flow Velocity Measurements in
           Liquids, in the Range 2-5 m/sec.
    7-B.   Calibration of a DISA Hot-Wire Anemometer and Measure-
           ments in a Circular Channel for Confirmation of the
           Calibration.
    7-C.   Error Due to Thermal Conduction Between the Sensing
           Wire and its Supports when Measuring Temperatures With
           a Wire Anemometer Used as a Resistance Thermometer.
    7-D.   Magnetohydrodynamic Effects on Hot-Film Measurements
           in Mercury.
    7-E.   New Trends in Hot-Film Probe Manufacturing.
                              69

-------
 8.   DISA Information No. 10,  October 1970, Issued by DISA Elektronik
     A/S, Herlev, Denmark.
     8-A.  Karman Vortices in Flows of Solutions of Friction-Drag-
           Reducing Polymers.
     8-B.  Amplitude Probability Analysis of Nonstationary Signals.
     8-C,.  A Survey of Methods for Measuring Correlation Functions.
     8-D.  Comparison of Some Methods of Calibrating Hot-Film Probes
           in Water.
     8-E.  A contribution to the Calibration of Hot-Wire Dual Probes.
     8-F.  A Suitable Method for Calibration of Hot-Film Probes.
 9.   "Hot Wire and Hot-Film Anemometry; An Introduction to the Theory
     and Application of the DISA Constant-Temperature Anemometer" by
     C. G. Rasmussen and B. B. Madsen published by DISA Elektronik
     A/S, Herlev, Denmark.
10.   DISA Scientific Research Equipment, Leaflet No.  2001, June 1970,
     Published by DISA Elektronik A/S, Herlev, Denmark.
11.   DISA Probe Manual, Leaflet No. 2004, February 1970, Published
     by DISA Elektronik A/S, Herlev, Denmark.
12.   DISA Transducer Manual,  Reg. No. 9150A3211,  February 1969,
     Published by DISA Elektronik A/S, Herlev, Denmark.
13.   Hot Film and Hot-Wire Anemometry Theory and Application
     Bulletin TBS,  Published by Thermo-Systems, Inc. ,  Saint Paul,
     Minnesota.
14.   Design Considerations for Hot-Film and Hot-Wire Anemometer
     Applications in Liquids, Published by Thermo-Systems, Inc. ,
     Saint Paul,  Minnesota.
                               70

-------
15. Constant Temperature Anemometry Theory Research Report No. 4,
    by Leroy M.  Fingerson 11 February 1970,  Published by Thermo-
    Systems, Inc.,  Saint Paul,  Minnesota.
16. "Flow Instrumentation" Published by Thermo-Systems, Inc.,
    Saint Paul, Minnesota.
17. "Heated Sensor Finds Wide Applications in Fluid Flow Measurements
    (Gases & Liquids)" Published by CGS/Datametrics, Watertown,
    Massachusetts.
18. "Fluid Flow Systems" Published by CGS/Datametrics, Watertown,
    Massachusetts.
19. "Probes and Sensors" (Hot-Wire and Hot-Film Anemometry),
    Bulletin 15P Published by CGS/Datametrics,
    Watertown, Massachusetts.
TECHNICAL REPORTS
20. Bellhouse,  B. J. , Schultz,  D. L.  and Karatzas, N. B., "The
    Measurement of Fluctuating Components of Velocity and Skin
    Friction with Thin-Film Heated Elements,  with Application in
    Water, Air and Blood Flows", University of Oxford,  Dept.  of
    Engr. Science Report, Report No. 1003, February 1966.
21. Patterson,  G. K.,  Zakin, J.  L.,  "Hot-Film Anemometry Measure-
    ments of Turbulence  in Pipe Flow: Organic Solvents", University of
    Missouri at Rolla, Department of  Chemical Engineering,
    December 1966.
22. Dreyer, G. F., "Calibration  of Hot-Film Sensors in a Towing  Tank
    and Application to Quantitative Turbulence Measurements"
    U. S. Naval Academy, Annapolis,  Maryland, March 1967.
                               71

-------
23.  Hoff, M.,  "Hot-Film Anemometry Techniques in Liquid Mercury",
    Grumman Research Department Memorandum RM-414J, June 1968.
24.  Rodrigues,  J. M.,  Patterson, G. K., and Zakin J. L., "Effects of
    Probe Geometry on Turbulence Measurements in Liquids Using
    Hot-Film Constant Temperature Anemometry", University of
    Missouri-Rolla, March 1969.
25.  Tanaka, D. H., "An Experimental Investigation of Turbulence at the
    Wall of a Pipe", U. S. Naval Academy, Anapolis, Maryland,
    June 1969.
26.  Geremia, John O.,  "An Experimental Investigation of Turbulence
    Effects at the Solid Boundary Using Flush Mounted Hot Film Sensors",
    Engr. Report 70-2, United States Naval Academy, January 7, 1970.
27.  Mies, R. W., "The Development  of Calibration Techniques for a
    Flush Mounted Hot-Film Anemometer in the Study of  Turbulent
    Boundary Layers",  Trident Scholar Report, U.  S. Naval Academy,
    1967.
28.  Lubwieg, H., "Instruments for Measuring the Wall Shearing  Stress
    of Turbulent Boundary Layers", NACA TM 1284, 1950.
29.  Liepmann, H. W.,  and Skinner, G. T., "Shearing Stress Measure-
    ments by Use of a Heated Element", NACA TN 3268,  1954.
30.  Runstadler, P. W., Kline S.  J.,  and Reynolds, W. C. , "An  Experi-
    mental Investigation of the  Flow Structure  of the Turbulent Boundary
    Layer", Stanford University Engineering Report MD-8, June 1963.
31.  Kos, V. N., Yu. I. Sitnitskiy,  "The Question of Measuring Average
    Velocity Rate in Pipes by Means of Point Type Sensors", Edited
    Translation by the Foreign Technology Division of the Air Force
    Systems Command, AD 700368, 18 September 1969.
                               72

-------
32. Fabula, A. G., "An Experimental Study of Grid Turbulence in
    Dilute High-Polymer Solutions",  U.  S. Naval Ordnance Test Station,
    China Lake, California, Report TP 4225,  November 1966.
33. Fingerson, L. M. , Blackshear,  P.  L., "Heat Flux Probe for Dyna-
    mic Measurements in High Temperature Gases", University of
    Minnesota Report Min-2-P, May 1961.
JOURNALS
34. King, L. V., "On the Convection of  Heat from Small Cylinders in a
    Stream of Fluid: Determination of the Convection Constants of
    Small Platinum Wires with Applications to Hot-Wire Anemometry",
    Phil. Trans.  Roy.  Soc.,  London, Ser A, Vol. 214,  1914.
35. Raichlen,  F., "Some Turbulence Measurements in Water", Journal
    of the Engineering Mechanics Division Proceedings  of the American
    Society of Civil Engineers, April 1967.
36. Richardson, E. V. , and McQuivey,  R. S.  , "Measurement of Turbu-
    lence in Water", Jornal of the Hydraulics  Division,  ASCE, Vol.  94,
    No. HY2,  Proc. Paper 5855, March 1968.
37. Melnik,  W. L. , Weshe, J. R.,  "Advances in Hot Wire Anemometry",
    International Symposium on Hot-Wire Anemometry,  University of
    Maryland, July 1968.
38. Resch, Francois, J., "Hot-Film Turbulence Measurements in
    Water Flow", Journal of the Hydraulics Division, Proceedings of
    the American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol.  96, No. HY3,
    March 1970.
39. Collis, D. C., Williams, M. J., "Two-Dimensional Convection
    from Heated Wires at Low Reynolds  Numbers", Journal of Fluid
    Mech. , Vol. 6, P357, 1959.
                               73

-------
40.  Wills, J. A. B., "The Correction of Hot-Wire Readings for
    Proximity to a Solid Boundary", Journal  of Fluid Mechanics, P388,
    October 1961.
41.  Champagne, F. H.,  Sleicher, C. A., Wehrmann, O. H., "Turbu-
    lence Measurements with Inclined Hot-Wires Part 1:  Heat Transfer
    Experiments with Inclined Hot Wire" Journal of Fluid Mechanics,
    Vol.  28 Part 1, pp 153-175, 1967.
42.  Symposium on  Measurement in Unsteady  Flow Presented at the ASME
    Hydraulic Division Conference Held in Worcester, Massachusetts,
    1962.
    42-A. Interpretation of Data and Response of Probes in
          Unsteady Flow.
    42-B.  Fundamentals of Hot-Wire Anemometry.
    42-C. The Constant Temperature Hot Thermistor
          Anemometer.
    42-D. Stable Operation of Hot-Film Probes in Water.
43.  Bakewell, H. P., Lumley, J. L. , "The Viscous Sublayer and
    Adjacent  Wall Region in Turbulent Pipe Flow", Physics  of Fluids,
    Vol.  10,  No. 9, September 1967.
44.  Killen, J. M. ,  Wetzed, J. M., Almo, J. A., "Turbulence Measure-
    ments in  Dilute Polymer Flows", Symposium on Turbulence Measure-
    ments in  Liquids, University of Missouri, Rolla, Missouri, 1969.
45.  Towsin, R. L., "Turbulence Detection,  Results from the Use of
    an Unobstructive Technique During Ship Model Testing", Trans.,
    INA, 1959.
                               74

-------
46. Burns, J. A., Murphy,  P.  J., "A Hot-Film Anemometer Evalua-
    tion of Turbulence Stimulators",  International Ship Building Progress,
    Vol.  12,  April 1965, pp 155-169.
47. Healy, Gerald D., Jr.,  "Flow Measurement Techniques",
    Instruments and Control Systems, March 1965, p 111.
48. Benson, James M., Baker, William C, Easter, Edmone,  "Thermal
    Mass Flowmeter", Instruments and Control Systems, February
    1970, p 85.
49. Laub, John H., "Thermal Flowmeters", Control Engineering,
    April 1966.
50. "Paints and Protective Coatings for Wastewater Treatment
    Facilities",  Water Pollution Control Federation Manual of Practice
    No. 17, 1969.
51. "Sewage Treatment Plant Design", Water Pollution Control
    Federation Manual of Practice No. 8,  1967.
52. "Operation of Wastewater Treatment Plants",  Water Pollution
    Control Federation Manual of Practice No. 11, 1970.
THESIS
53. Patterson,  G. P., "Turbulence Measurements in Polymer Solutions
    Using Hot Film Anemometry", PhD Dissertation, University of
    Missouri, Rolla,  Missouri, 1966.
54. Hubbard, P.  G.,  "Constant-Temperature Hot-Wire Anemometry
    with Application to Measurements in Water".  Dept.  of Mechanics
    and Hydraulics, Graduate College of the State University of Iowa,
    June 1954.
55. Ling, S,  C., "Measurement of Flow Characteristics by the Hot-
    Film Technique", Department of Mechanics and Hydraulics,
    Graduate College of the State University of Iowa, June 1955.
                               75

-------
56.  Dell Osso, L., "Turbulence Measurements in Water in an Open
    Channel with the Hot-Film Anemometer", Dept. of Chem. Engr.,
    Graduate College of Rice University, May 1966.
57.  McQuivey, R. S., "Dissertation Turbulence in a Hydrodynamically
    Rough and Smooth Open Channel Flow",  Colorado State University,
    August 1967.
TEXTBOOKS
58.  Chow, Yen Te, "Open-Channel Hydraulics", McGraw Hill, 1959.
59.  King,  Horace Williams and Brater, Ernest  F.,  "Handbook of
    Hydraulics" McGraw-Hill, Fifth Edition, 1963.
60.  "Design and Construction of Sanitary and Storm Sewers",  WPCF
    Manual of Practice No.  9, Published by Water  Pollution Control
    Federation, October 12,  1967.
61.  Hinze, J.  O., "Turbulence", McGraw-Hill,  1959.
62.  Streeter, Victor,  L., "Handbook of Fluid Dynamics",  McGraw-
    Hill, 1961.
63.  Robertson, James M. , "Hydrodynamics In Theory and Application",
    Prentice Hall, 1965.
64.  Kreith, Frank, "Principles of Heat Transfer",  International Text-
    book Company, 1958.
65.  Giedt, Warren H., "Principles of Engineering Heat Transfer",
    D. VanNostrand,  1957.
                               75

-------
PAPERS
66.  Paper No. 2-5-71 Presented at the Symposium on Flow Its
    Measurement and Control in Science and Industry Pittsburgh, Pa.
    May 10-14, 1971 "Quasi-Correlation Circuit for  Thermal Pulse
    Time-of-Flight Flowmeter" by Ronald D. Hill and
    Richard D. McGunigle.
                               77

-------
                      SECTION XIV
                     APPENDICES

                                                      Page No.
A         L,ist of Vendors                                 81
B         Drawing List                                   83
C         Strut Flowmeter Test at NSRDC                  85
              Table 1:   Flowmeter Electrical Calibration   89
              Table 2:   Flowmeter Calibration             90
D         Flowmeter Test at NBS
              Table 1:   N. B. S.  Calibration Data           97
                             79

-------
                        SECTION XIV
                        APPENDtX A

                     LIST OF VENDORS
 1  Alnor Instrument Co.
    Div.  111.  Testing Labs
    151 W. Hubbard St.
    Chicago 10, 111.

 2  Bacharach Indicator Instr. Co.
    200 North Bradock Ave.
    Pittsburg 8,  Penn.

 3  Beckman & Whittley Inc.
    973 E. San Carlos Ave.
    San Carlos, California

 4  Davis Instr.  Mfg.  Co.
    709 E. 36th
    Baltimore 18,  Md.

 5  F. W. Dwyer Mfg. Co.
    P. O.  Box 373V
    Michigan City, Indiana

 6  Electric Speed Indicator Co.
    12234 Triskett Rd.
    Cleveland 11, Ohio

 7  Fisher Scientific Co.
    244 Fisher Bldg.
    Pittsburg 19,  Penn.

 8  Flow Corp.
    205 6th St.
    Cambridge 42, Mass.

 9  Friez Instruments
    Div.  Benix Corp.
    1400  Taylor Ave.
    Baltimore 4, Md.

10  Henry J.  Green Instr. Co*
    2500  Shames Drive
    Besberry, N. Y.
11  W. & L. E. Gurley
    Union Street
    Troy, N. Y.

12  Hasting Raydist,  Inc.
    Newcomb Ave.
    Hampton, Virginia

13  Hill & Co.
    E. Vernon
    P. O. Box 189
    Lake Geneva, Wise.
14
15
16
18
Clark H. Joy Co.
27005 Knickerbocker Rd.
Bay Village 40, Ohio
Kenyon Inst. Co.
P. O. Box 355
Brewster, N. Y.
Inc.
Koeffel & Esser
300 Adams
Hoboken, N. J.  07030

M.  E. D.  Indicators
Div. United Instr. Labs
104 W. Jefferson St.
Falls Church, Va. 22046

Science Assoc.
194 Nassau St.
Box 216
Princeton, N. J.
19  Taylor Inst. Co.
    Amest St.
    Rochester, N. Y.

20  Thermo Systems, Inc.
    2418 E. Hennepin Ave.
    Minneapolis 13,  Minn.
                               81

-------
                 LIST OF VENDORS (Cont'd)

21  Universal Instr.  Co.
    3807 Bunker Hill Rd.
    Brentwood, Md.

22  Westberry Mfg. Co.
    3400 Westach Way
    Sonoma,  California 95476

23  Wilson Products
    Div. Electric Storage Battery Co.
    2nd & Washington St.
    Reading,  Penn.

24  Baily Meter Co.
    1033 Ivenhough Rd.
    Cleveland 10, Ohio

25  Barton Instr. Co.
    580 Monterey Pass Rd.
    Monterey Park, Cal.

26  Bristel Co.
    P.O.  Box 1790 MBB
    Waterberry 20, Conn.

27  Brook Instr. Co., Inc.
    407 West Bend St.
    P.O.  Box MRB 9698
    Hatfield,  Penn.

28  F. W. Briar Mfg. Co.
    P.O.  373Z
    Michigan City, Indiana

29  DISA Electronics
    779 Susquehanna Ave.
    Franklin  Lakes, N.J.
    #891-9460
                               82

-------
E-71320002
C-71320003
A-71320008
B-71320013
C-71320015
E-71320017
E-71320018
C-71320019
C-71320020
C-71320021
C-71320022
C-71320023
C-71320024
C-71320025
B-71320026
B-71320027
B-71320028
B-71320029
E-71320030
E-71320031
C-7132Q032
E-71320034
D-71320035
D-71320036
D-71320040
D-71320041
         SECTION XIV
         APPENDIX B
        DRAWING LIST
Flow Sig. Pick-up Ass'y and Installation
Housing, Flow Pick-up
Wiring List
Bridge Preamp
Flowmeter,  Sensor Electronics
Instrument Container Ass'y
Panel Ass'y
Door Ass'y Counter Mounting
Latch - Counter Support
PC Card (Height Gauge)
Bottom Cover - Mod.
Top Cover - Mod.
Bracket (Gauge and Time Code Gen. Mount)
Side Card Holder
Bracket
Bracket, Hinge
Bracket, Hinge
Spacer
Case, Power Supply
Instrument Case Modification
Mounting Plate, Power Supply
Power Supply Ass'y
Flow Meter Test Ass'y
Phase Shifting Circuit
Block Diagram, Flow Measuring Device
A/D Converter, Flow Measuring Device
                             83

-------
D-71320042
C-71320043
C-71320044
A-71320045
D-1007-01-210
D-1007-10-231
1 00046

SK-FM203
SK-FM204
SK-FM210
SK-FM211
SK-FM212
SK-FM226
SK-FM227
SK-FM228
SK-FM401
SK-FM402
  DRAWING LIST (Cont'd)
Logic Diagram, Data Acquisition
Voltage Controlled Phase Shifter
Correlator
Cal.  Curve - Height Gauge
   Plus and Minus 15 volt power supply (BL Packer)
   Plus 5 volt power supply (BL Packer)
   Water Level Gauge Model 100
   (March & McBurney,  Inc.)
   Output Multiplexer Schematic
   Sequence Control Schematic
   Phase Shifter Schematic
   Heater Cut-off  Schematic
   Level and offset Adj.  Schematic
   Multiplier Test Card Schematic
   SIMPLIFIED Block Diagram
   Analog Section  Schematic
   Calibration Pipe Layout
   Sewer Belt Details
                              84

-------
                       SECTION XIV
                       APPENDIX C
          STRUT FLOWMETER TEST AT N. S. R. D. C.
 PURPOSE
 To subject the flowmeter  sensor block and electronics to a full scale
 preliminary calibration, the sensor is to have a constant velocity
 water flow passed by the sensor.  Accuracy and repeatability of
 the flowmeter is to be determined from these tests.
 TEST PLAN
 In order to provide a constant flow of water at measured accuracies
 of at least one percent, it is proposed to transport the flow sensor
 blocks through a still water basin.  To accomplish this, a tow
 carriage at  the NSRDC facility at Carderock,  Maryland, is to be
 utilized.  A strut is to be used as the mounting tool for at least two
 sensor blocks.  The carriage is to be transported at various veloc-
 ities from one to ten feet per second.  A comparison of the two
 sensor block readings as a function of the  sensor block velocity is
 to be accomplished.  The velocity runs are to consist  of ten different
 velocities and at least three runs at or near the various  velocities
 are to be taken to investigate the repeatability of the flow measure-
 ments.  The number of data points taken will be a function of the
 available time of the calibration facility.   Prior to these detail data
 runs,  at least two data runs at the  extremes of the velocity range
 are to be accomplished to define  the range of data available.
 The data is to be gathered by monitoring the counter on the carriage
to determine the water velocity,  and the flowmeter counter to
determine the sensor reading.  The attached data sheet is to be
 utilized for the recording of all data.
                               85

-------
CALIBRATION DATA RUNS
                                      Sheet (2)
Data Run
6
6
7
7
8
8
9
9
10
10
11
11
12
12
13
13
14
14
15
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Carriage Speed
(ft/sec)
1.023
1.023
1.25
1.25
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.50
1.71
1.71
2.0
2.0
2.25
2.25
2.50
2.50
2.73
2.73
2.98
2.98
3.24
3.49
3.77
3.50
2.72
2.98
4.00
0.741





























Sensor Reading
(m sec)
832
158
832
off scale
end of run
end of run
567
off scale
485.8
off scale
380.5
off scale
323
off scale
315
off scale
303
off scale
296.8
off scale
278
155
142
212
251
254
116
97





























Sensor No.
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
              86

-------
                    CALIBRATION DATA RUNS
                                                             Sheet (2)
Data Run
24
25
26
27
28























Carriage Speed
(ft/sec)
0.51
2.49
2.98
3.24
1.80




















































Sensor Reading
(m sec)
581
284
212
173-198
**




















































Sensor No.
1
2
2
2
2























 *  Settle to 203  settle to 198 runaway low 173 and persistent; 161 absolute
**  Started run at 3.0 ft/sec slow to 1. 75 ft/sec  read 398,  403 and 420
    at end of the run.
                                  87

-------
INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION DATA
In order to better understand the measurements obtained from this
flowmeter, it was deemed necessary  to calibrate the instrument with
electrical signals.  A signal was fed to the unit in lieu of the
thermistor signals and was delayed by a calibrated amount.  The
output reading of the flowmeter was recorded for each phase delayed
signal.  Table 3 indicates a typical data calibration run.
Column 2  of Table 3 is a correction factor of -400 milliseconds
which is necessary to account for the  delays associated with driving
the heater and the sensing offset factor of the thermistor bridge/
preamplifier combination.  The  -400 milliseconds value is a theoret-
ical number which has been verified in laboratory tests.
Columns 2 and 3 have been fitted by a computer curve program and
the following equation derived:
                                              C\0  433
                                    meter read!
                                      in msec I
The index of determination for this equation with the aforementioned
data is 0. 9986.
The instruments used to acquire this data are a Ling 401AR Servo
Analyzer and a  Monsanto 100B counter.
SUMMARY OF TEST
A summary of the results of the flowmeter's calibration is indicated
in Table 4.  It should be noted in Table 4 that only a portion of the
total data  runs have been selected for analysis.  The other test runs
have not been presented for analysis due to questions regarding the
test during the gathering of the other data points. For example,
after some data points had been acquired,  it was determined that the
data readout had a persistent reading  of one value for a long interval.

-------
            Table (1).   Flowmeter Electrical Calibration

Input Signal Delay     Corrected Delay to Account     Flowmeter Output
   (m/sec)            for Heater Opr.  (m sec)            (m sec)
    502                       102                          65
    527                       127                        116
    556                       156                        190
    584                       184                        276
    612                       212                        361
    645                       245                        511
    661                       261                        591
    684                       284                        716
                                 89

-------
          Table (2) .  N. S. R. D. C. Calibration Test Data

Data   Carriage Readout                          Thermal Wave
Run   Speed    Counter   Actual Flow Thermal    Velocity
   . )   (ft/sec)   (m/sec)   Wave Flow Ratio  %     (ft/sec)
 19      1.50     576             10.7               0.161
10      1.71     485             10.4               0.174
11      2.00     380              9.75              0.193
12      2.25     323              9.30              0.209
i?      3.49     155              8.40              0.294
}8      3.77     142              8.12              0.306
22      4.00     116              8.20              0.328
25      2.49     248              9.60              0.238
26      2.98     212              8.56              0.254
27      3.24     181              8.45              0.274
                               90

-------
However, with a little more settling time the readout would change to
a new permanent value.  After this effect had been noted, the data
runs were repeated to determine the final readout value.  The
resultant readout numbers have been analyzed by a least squares data
fit.  The resultant equation,provides an Index of Determination value
of 0. 9944, indicating an extremely good curve fitting.  The resultant
equation is:
                                      1077
            Delay Indicated =?•" -.	^—=^—rr-   - 154. 6   -Y4)
               (msec)        Average Flow Velocity             ,V
                                   (ft/sec)
In addition,  the data points were plotted on a semilog plot as
indicated in Figure 20. Flow velocity in feet per second is one axis
while the counter readout in milliseconds is indicated on the other
axis.  Note that a smooth curve line is formed by the data points.
The curvature  of the line at the low carriage speeds is due to the
electronic range of operation.  An examination of Table 4 indicates
that the ratio of actual flow to the measured thermal wave flow is
greater than the unit was expected to encounter.  This flow rate
caused a change in operating range to  be implemented in the field to
reduce the sensing range.  Since a limited time was available to
check the realignment, it has been determined after the test that
most of the data has been obtained in the non-linear region of the
electrical calibration.  In addition, one sensor did  not operate in the
region of 1. 0 feet per second to 10. 0 feet per second,  but rather
from 1. 0 feet per second down in velocity.   Therefore, the taking of
double data for analysis redundancy was not possible.
After the adjustment to alter the flow velocity measurement region,
there were no further adjustments or malfunctions  of the equipment.
An electrical calibration was performed immediately upon the return
                               91

-------
 s
 o
 o
 0)
w

 rH
 
-------
to the laboratory as stated in the Instrument Calibration paragraph.
The laboratory tests indicate a total hysteresis and stability error
range of less than 1 percent for the electronic measurement system.
The combined hydrodynamic characteristics and thermal wave
measurement  characteristics  of the sensor block were the real
purpose of this test.  A few preliminary data runs indicated the  strut
characteristics differed with those found on the wall of a sewer pipe.
To ensure the presence of turbulent flow, a strip of sandpaper was
added to the front of the strut.  After this addition, the thermal  wave
velocity, which was measured by the sensor,  increased an order of
magnitude indicating turbulent flow was present.  Measured flow
velocities indicate that the strut configuration in the velocity range
to 5 feet per second presented a different flow regime environment
than was to be found in a sewer pipe.  The uniformity of the data
indicates the sensor configuration is workable; however, the range
of percentage  of average flow  velocity indicates that higher than
expected thermal wave velocities were measured.  A review of the
test arrangements, however,  provide an  explanation of this phe-
nomena and indicates that this test cannot be used as a judgment of
the overall usability of this measurement technique.  A different
test technique must be employed to ensure a test which is not only
accurate in its velocity calibrations, but also simulates Reynolds
numbers in pipe flow which are similar to those expected in a
sewer pipe.  The flow characteristic change accounts for the require-
ment to alter the electronic sensitivity.  It should be noted that
during these full scale tests no problems in sensitivity were noted.
A repeat calibration is recommended with particular attention given
to the hydraulics of the test.  If well ordered, repeatable test data
are obtained,  as in this test, then the unit can be considered a feasible
                               93

-------
flowrneter.  The test results obtained also confirm the theories
concerning the penetration of the thermal pulse through the boundary
layers to provide a secondary measurement of the average flow
velocity.  The test also indicates that the sensor shape is correct in
that a speed up and thinning of the boundary layers is being accom-
plished.
There is presently no theory at hand to explain the  settling of the
data to one readout number than shifting to another.  No laboratory
testing has been able to duplicate this condition.   More testing will
be required to validate theories explaining this phenomena.
                              94

-------
                       SECTION XIV
                       APPENDIX D
                   FLOWMETER TEST AT
            NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS
PURPOSE
To subject the flowmeter sensor  blocks, as configured, to measure
flow in a sewer pipe,  to a full scale calibration.  The sensors are
to have a set of constant water velocity flow conditions which cover
the  design range of the flowmeter.  Accuracy and  repeatability are
to be determined from these tests.
TEST PLAN
A belt containing sensor blocks is to be mounted in a 24-inch pipe
section and the pipe inserted in the National Bureau of Standards
Flow Test Facility.  In addition,  the test strut  containing two
sensor blocks is to be mounted as a center chord across the pipe.
A comparison of the velocity measurements of  the belt sensors
and the strut sensors as a function of wat er velocity is to be ac-
complished.  The water velocities to be utilized will vary from
1 foot/second to 14 feet/second with a five-step calibration pro-
gressing with increasing velocity from  1 to 14 feet/second and then
decreasing from 14 to 1 feet/second.  At each velocity five data
runs are to be gathered with a primary calibration to be accom-
plished by measuring the quantity of water over a  specified in-
terval.  Four of the data runs will be on the belt sensors and one
devoted to the strut sensors.  All data is to be  gathered by the
automatic data recordings of the  flowmeter and by manually mon-
itoring a parallel readout device.
                               95

-------
The nominal velocities to be investigated and their order of in-
vestigation are to be as follows:  (1, 3; 7, 10; 14) feet/second.
If this data appears useful,  then (12, 9, 6, 4, 2) feet/second are
to be  investigated.
The following data are presented as the most significant of that
gathered and represents a compilation of the total numbers
obtained.
                              96

-------
Run
No.
N. B. S.
Measured
Velocity
          Table 1
 N. B. S. Calibration Test Data

Sensor Sensor   Sensor   Sensor  Sensor   Sensor
#1     #1       #1       #2      #2       #2
Read   "C       Meas.   Read   °C      Meas.
Out    Peak to  Velocity Out     Peak to  Velocity
     ffjj   \    V7U.U    JTCCtn. tU  V CiU^iiy  WUt     JTCO.JV LU  V ClU^lt-'
     (tt/sec)    (msec) Peak     (ft/sec)  (msec)  Peak    (ft/sec)
       1.401
       2.595
 8
  4.100
 393
 546
 497
 386
 715

 697
 785
 770
 778
 811

 957
                    003
                    0015
0012
       2.134
10
  1.857
  493
  509
  555
  581
  617

  452
  571
  526
  435
  434
                    002
003
       .0454
       .0483
       .0475
       .0453
       .0528

       .0523
       .0556
       .0540
       .0542
       .0550
                              saturated
                              reading
.0474
.0477
.0485
.0490
.0499

.0467
.0488
.0478
.0458
.0460
535
534
515
509
504

772
777
775
780
777

829
825
821
821
817

761
743
702
658
636

678
525
561
635
627
                 009
                 007
                 006
                        008
009
       .0432
       .0432
       .0420
       .0419
       .0419

       .0461
       .0463
       .0458
       .0459
       .0458
                                                 saturated
                                                  reading
.0459
.0457
.0447
.0441
.0438

.0447
.0426
.0427
.0438
.0437
                             97

-------
TEST DESCRIPTION
The data obtained by this test is indicated in Table 5.  The data
shown has been selected and is the best of the test runs.   In ad-
dition to the average stream velocity, as determined by the
National Bureau of Standards,  the sensor readouts are listed,
as well  as the approximate temperature variation at the sensor
bridge,  and the calculated local stream velocities at the sensor
blocks.  The local sensor velocities were determined from the
Sensor Readout data and the electrical calibration of the instrument
as presented in Figure 21.  The data for Figure 21 was obtained as
in the previous  calibration test by inserting an electrical signal
at the sensor input to the unit and varying the phase shift while
monitoring the output.  All data points were taken after a  five-
minute stabilizing interval had elapsed.
TEST SUMMARY
A review of the data indicates a widely varying range of sensor
velocity measurements.  In addition,  the extremely low signals
indicate that some data jitter is present due to the fact that noise
signals  in excess of the data signals were present.  A close visual
observation of the wave forms indicated that hydrodynamic phenom-
ena was inducing apparent water velocities at the sensor face  that
appeared to vary over a wide range of values with time.  No pat-
tern or  randomness was determined during these tests but, in
addition, no predominance of a given value was noted in short
term observations.  The lack of preponderance of a given flight
time would lead to a varying output  number from the processing
electronics in the unit.  Indeed this is the indication which was
noted and it is therefore concluded that more investigation into
                               98

-------
the water velocity variations expected,  in a boundary layer of a
pipe flowing as in this calibration test,  is required.
                                99

-------
      noo
      1000
  Ul
re C
r- O
0> O
Q M—
900
       800
       yon
          300
              400           500        600         700

                       Counter Reading (milliseconds)
800
                Figure 21.  Electrical Calibration (Actual Time Delay
                            vs.  Reading of the Instrument).
                                              100
                                                             "U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE:1973 514.

-------
SELECTED WATER
RESOURCES ABSTRACTS
INPUT TRANSACTION FORM
w
 "A Thermal Wave Flowmeter for Measuring Combined Sewer Flows"
                     Robert A. Blase
                     Paul W. Eshleman
                     Hydrospace-Challenger, Inc.
                     2150 Fields Road
                     Rockville, Maryland  20850

12.  Sponsoring Organist;on  Environmental Protection Agency
Environmental Protection Agency report number EPA-R2-73-145
                                                                 *. Pf-'orntis" Qigar:-ition
                                                                   A\-,.,.rr Nt.
                                                                   EPA  11020 EYD
  EPA  14-12-911
13  Type:  ReiM:  -nil
   PfT-oa Covered
Contract 10/70-6/72
     A study of the application of thermal techniques to the measurement of flow rates
 in combined sewers has been conducted.  The utilization of  flush-mounted hot wire or
 hot  film anemometers in a direct reading mode was extensively  investigated.  It was
 concluded that such a direct reading application was not feasible due  to shifts in
 calibration caused by the build-up of contamination and the lack of commercially
 available units with sufficient ruggedness and reliability  for application in a com-
 bined  sewer pipe.

     A particular technique, which is based upon measuring  the time-of-flight of
 thermal pulses generated at various positions around the perinphery of the pipe,
 was  investigated in depth.  A full scale prototype unit was fabricated and tested.
 These  tests indicated that the configuration does not provide  signals  which have
 precision to enable the measure of fluid flow with the desired accuracy.
17a. Descriptors

    *Flow Measurement,   *Combined Sewers, * Anemometers, *Flowrneters,
    Discharge Measurement, Storm Drains, Hydraulics
17b. Identifiers

    *Time-of-flight,  *non-invasive, correlator, integrated circuit




• 17c. COWKRFipirl& Group    Q7 B
18. A:rih<^i!ity 19.
20.
. Ab.-itt actor Paul W. Eshleman
Sfurity C'-iss.
(Report)
Security Class.
(Pvge)
21. $'•:: Ot
Pages
22. Price
Send To:
WATt R PE" L^OU Rr F S S'' 1 ( N
U S DT PA PT V5 ENT OF T H L
WASH IN'. ION L> '' I?O24i
\ Hydrospace-Challenger ,
-|F|. ! NTO'HMATh.iN CENTER
r j T I. K 1 0 R
Inc.

-------