EPA-660/2-74-070
DECEMBER 1974
                        Environmental Protection Technology Series
Extended  Aeration  Sewage Treatment
in  Cold Climates
                                     National Environmental Research Center
                                       Office of Research and Development
                                      U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                              Corvallis, Oregon 97330

-------
                      RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES
Research reports of the Office of Research and Development,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, have been grouped into
five series.  These five broad categories were established to
facilitate further development and application of environmental
technology.  Elimination of traditional grouping was consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in
related fields.  The five series are:

          1.   Environmental Health Effects Research
          2.   Environmental Protection Technology
          3.   Ecological Research
          4.   Environmental Monitoring
          5.   Socioeconomic Environmental Studies

This report has been assigned to the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
TECHNOLOGY STUDIES series.  This series describes research
performed to develop and demonstrate instrumentation, equipment
and methodology to repair or prevent environmental degradation from
point and non-point sources of pollution.  This work provides the
new or improved technology required for the control and treatment
of pollution sources to meet environmental quality standards.

                         EPA REVIEW NOTICE

This report has been reviewed by the National Environmental
Research Center—Corvallis, and approved for publication.  Mention
of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement
or recommendation for use.

-------
                                       EPA-660/2-74-070
                                       December 1974
   EXTENDED AERATION SEWAGE TREATMENT

             IN COLD CLIMATES
              H. J. Coutts
           C. D. Christiansen
Arctic Environmental Research Laboratory
 National Environmental  Research Center
            College, Alaska
         Program Element 1BB044
           ROAP 21ASG, Task 01
 NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER
   OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
  U.S.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
           CORVALLIS, OREGON

-------
                               ABSTRACT


In an effort to develop design criteria for biological  treatment of low
temperature domestic sewages, the Arctic Environmental  Research Laboratory
has designed and operated two parallel  low temperature extended aeration
units near Fairbanks, Alaska.

The two units had exposed aeration basins utilizing submerged aerators and
were differentiated by type of clarifier.  One unit had a conventional
horizontal flow clarifier while the other had a modified upflow clarifier
with tube settlers.  The liquid temperatures varied from 0°C to 19PC.   In
addition, a 0.5 MGD subarctic, oxidation ditch and low temperature bench
scale units were studied.

Organic loading was the parameter most seriously affected by the low tempera^
tures.  It was found that BOD removals above 80 percent at liquid tempera-
tures below 7°C could generally be maintained at loadings of 0.08 Kg BOD/Kg
MLSS/Day or less.

As in warmer climates, intentional sludge wastage was found to be required.
Low temperature solids accumulation rates indicated that the standard  was-
tage criteria of 0.5 Kg SS/Kg BOD is usually adequate.

Other parameters investigated and reported were:

1.  aeration for oxygen transfer and mixing.

2.  comparative clarifier performance.

3.  nutrient and total coliform removals.

This report was submitted in fulfillment of Project Number 16100, by the
Arctic Environmental Research Laboratory.  Work was completed December 1973.

-------
                                CONTENTS

SECTION                                                             PAGE

     I      RECOMMENDATIONS                                           1

    II      SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS                                   2

                 Facility Design                                      2
                 Organic Loading                                      3
                 Solids Separation                                    5
                 SIudge Wasting                                       5
                 Nutrients and Coliform Removal                       5

   III      INTRODUCTION                                              6

                 General                                              6
                 Scope and Purpose                                    6
                 Basic Process Description                            7

    IV      FACILITIES AND METHODS                                   10

                 Cold Room Bench Scale Reactors                      10
                 Eielson Air Force Base Pilot Plants                 17
                 Oxidation Ditches                                   23

     V      OPERATION AND PERFORMANCE                                26

                 Cold Room Reactors                                  26
                 Eielson Air Force Base Units                        29
                 Oxidation Ditches                                   37

    VI      MAJOR  FACTORS AFFECTING PERFORMANCE                      40

                 Organic Loading Effects                             40
                 Solids Levels and Separation                        44
                 Solids Accumulation and Wastage                     57
                 Dissolved Oxygen Levels                             63
                 Upsets                                              64

   VII      MINOR  FACTORS AFFECTING PERFORMANCE                      65

                 Mixing                                              65
                 Biological Characteristics                          65
                 Equipment Housing and Process Exposure              68

  VIII      OTHER  PERFORMANCE CRITERIA                               70

                 Nutrients                                           70
                 Total Coliforrs                                     74

    IX      REFERENCES                                               73

     \      GLOSSARY                                                 SI
                                    11 i

-------
                             LIST  OF  FIGURES

NUMBER                                                             PAGE

   1        Basic Activated Sludge  Treatment Process                   8

   2       Cone Reactors Schematic of Apparatus                      11

   3       33.7-Liter Reactor Details                               12

   4       33.7-Liter Reactor Schematic of Apparatus                13

   5       47.1-Liter Reactor Details                               14

   6       47.1-Liter Reactor Schematic of Apparatus                15

   7       Eielson Air Force Base Extended Aeration  Pilot
           Plants                                                   18

   8       Eielson Air Force Base Extended Aeration  Pilot
           Plant Sections                                           19

   9       Upside Extended Aeration Pilot Unit                      20

  10       Horizontal Flow Extended Aeration Pilot Unit             22

  11        College Utilities Oxidation Ditch                        24

  12       EAFB Pilot Extended Aeration Units Horizontal
           Flow Clarifier Percent BOD Removal and Aeration
           Basin Temperature                                        32

  13       EAFB Pilot Extended Aeration Units Upflow Clarifier
           Percent BOD Removal and Aeration Basin Temperature       33

  14       EAFB Pilot Extended Aeration Units Horizontal
           Flow Clarifier Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids and
           Effluent Suspended Solids                                35

  15       EAFB Pilot Extended Aeration Units Upflow Clarifier
           Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids and Effluent Suspended
           Solids                                                   36

  16       Temperature Effects of Loading on Performance             43

  17       Performance vs. Solids  Detention EAFB Extended
           Aeration Units                                           45

  18       33.7-Liter and 47-1-Liter Reactors Effluent Suspended
           Solids vs. Overflow Rates  at Various  Temperatures         49

  19       Sludge Action in Settling  Tubes                          50

-------
                       LIST OF FIGURES CONTINUED
NUMBER                                                              PAGE

  20      33.7-Liter Reactor Sludge Heights in Effluent
          Tubes vs. Effluent Overflow Rates with
          Continuous Flow Through Tubes                              51

  21      Rate of Sludge Rise in Tubes vs.  Sludge Height             52

  22      2-Liter Settlometer Test, 0-5 Minute Rate EAFB
          Pilot Extended Aeration Plant                              56

  23      Volume Percent of Activated Sludge vs. Detention
          Time--EAFB Pilot Extended Aeration Plant                   58

  24      Solids Accumulation EAFB Extended Aeration Units           61

  25      Denitrification Study Sample Stations                      72

  26      Denitrification Study, Tube Settler Nitrogen
          Profile                                                    73

-------
                             LIST OF TABLES

NUMBER                                                              PAGE

   1       Data Summary 1.3°C Cone Reactor                            27

   2       Data Summary 6.5°C Cone Reactor                            28

   3       Summary of Results of 33.7-Liter Reactor and
          47.1-Liter Reactor at 12 Hour Detention                    30

   4       Summary of Results of 33.7-Liter Reactor at
          24-Hour Detention                                          31

   5       Oxidation Ditch--College, Alaska, Average
          Performance Data                                           38

   6       Subarctic Alaska Extended Aeration Units--
          Average Performance Data                                   41

   7       33.7-Liter Reactor--Results  of Operating with  Varying
          Effluent Overflow Rates on the Settling Tubes               48

   8       47.1-Liter Reactor--Results  of Operating with
          Varying Effluent Overflow Rates on the  Settling  Tubes      54

   9       47.1-Liter Reactor--Sludge Levels in  Tubes  at
          Various Effluent Overflow Rates                            55

  10       Comparison of Up Side with Tube Horizontal  Flow
          and Clarifiers                                             59

  11       EAFB Extended Aeration  Basins—Horizontal Velocity
          Components                                                 66

  12       Cone Reactors Results of Nutrient Analysis                  71

  13       EAFB Extended Aeration—Nitrogen Cycle                      75

  14       EAFB Extended Aeration—Phosphorus Data                    76

  15       EAFB Pilot Units Total  Coliforms Remaining
          Before Chlorination                                        77

-------
                            ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS


The foresight and initiative of the Arctic Environmental  Research  Laboratory's
first Waste Treatment Research Director, Mr. Sidney E.  Clark,  provided the
impetus for a viable waste treatment research program,  of which  this  report
is a summary of the work on extended aeration.   His contribution is  acknow-
ledged with sincere thanks.

The Alaska Air Command, Headquarters, Civil Engineering Division,  has pro-
vided most of the support in the initial construction of the Eielson  Air
Force Base pilot plants.  Their assistance is acknowledged with  sincere thanks.

The 5010th Civil Engineers of Eielson Air Force Base, and especially  Mr.
Jack Howard and the waste plant operators, have given their continued assis-
tance in maintaining, operating, and sampling the Eielson Air  Force  Base
pilot plants.  Their- contribution is acknowledged with  sincere thanks.

The College Utilities Corporation has provided the unpublished data  on their
oxidation ditch.  Their contribution is acknowledged with sincere  thanks.
                                   VI 1

-------
                               SECTION I

                            RECOMMENDATIONS
The conventional extended aeration sewage treatment process can provide
secondary treatment with low temperature sewage under subarctic conditions
if the two following recommendations are followed:
1.   Faci1ity Design :
must be determined  b
The required degree of protection against freezing
proper heat transfer calculations.
2.  Process Design:  (a)  Organic loading should not exceed 0.08 Kg BOD/
Kg MLSS/Day at MLSS temperatures below 7°C.  (b)  An effluent polishing
system, such as a lagoon, sand filter, or microscreen, should be used if
separate sludge wastage facilities are not installed.

-------
                             SECTION II


                       SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS


Waste water treatment research and development activities in Alaska have
been primarily directed toward adapting  the biological  processes for
use in cold climates.  The feasibility of the extended  aeration process
as an economical  and effective means of  secondary waste treatment has
been demonstrated in the laboratory and  in the field.   However, the pro-
cess requires more consistent operation  and maintenance than many lagoon
systems in an area where costs are high  and skilled operators are extremely
scarce.


FACILITY DESIGN


Additional long-term experience should further demonstrate economical
and efficient operation of cold operating temperatures.  Cold tempera-
ture process design criteria must be used if systems with mixed liquor
temperature less  than 10°C are to reach  optimum efficiency.   An obvious
key to successful operation of an extended aeration system at any tem-
perature is the solids separation process.  Additional  study is needed
to determine optimum mixed liquor dissolved oxygen levels for the separa-
tion and thickening process.

The heat transfer characteristics of each component in  the treatment
system from collection and transport through each unit  process should
be carefully considered in any cold climate project.  Present thermal
design is based largely on empirical methods which are  not necessarily
economical.

Utilization of exposed aeration chambers for the extended aeration pro-
cess is practical.  Earthen basins are feasible where economic and con-
struction conditions warrant, provided impervious liners are utilized.
Provision of a stable sidewall surface that can tolerate mixing velo-
cities, wave action, freeze-thaw cycles, extreme temperatures and ice
movement is very  important.  Otherwise vertical sidewall construction
should be utilized to promote better mixing.  Reinforced concrete block
and/or concrete grout should be considered as economical liner materials
where the design  permits.

When basins with  low sloping sidewalls construction are utilized, the
aeration devices  should be clustered in  the center of the basin for
best mixing.   For heat economy, consideration should be given to mounting
the clarifiers within the  aeration basin.  When utilizing exposed basins,
heat loss effects must be  evaluated in conjunction with detention time

-------
to avoid potential freezing problems.  The detention time available
before icing occurs is a function of sewage temperature, ambient air
temperature, and aeration basin configuration.  For interior Alaska, the
following maximum detention times at the corresponding sewage tempera-
tures should provide an adequate margin of safety:


            Detention Days          Sewage Temperature °C

                 1                              5

                 2                             10

                 4                             20
Vulnerable equipment such as pretreatment. units, pumps, and flow mea-
surement devices should be located in a heated enclosure.   Secondary
sedimentation basins also need to be enclosed but may not need heating.

Some protection against freezing should be provided for aeration equip-
ment with minimum heat enclosures for compressors and unheated housing
for oxidation ditch rotors.  Exposed surface aerators require excessive
maintenance in cold climates and, therefore, should not be considered.
Warmer temperature criteria are adequate for sizing submerged aeration
equipment.  Air piping should not pass through the exposed water surface
because it may freeze shut during a power failure.

Extensive icing on an aeration basin can be a problem in an extended aera-
tion process.  Suspended solids entrainment in the ice may cause failure
of the process.  However, solids captured in surface ice may prove to be
an excellent method for concentrating and removing solids from an ex-
posed aerobic digestion basin because sludge that has been frozen de-
waters vary easily.  This technique needs to be demonstrated before its
economics in cold climate areas can be defined.

Air lifts for sludge return have been proven to be satisfactory in many
smaller extended aeration units.
ORGANIC LOADING
The process parameter most seriously affected by the low temperature
was organic loading.  The normal warmer temperature design loading
range for extended aeration is 0.01 to 0.1 Kg BOD/Kg MLSS/Day, but in
actual practice some plants operate efficiently at loadings approaching
0.2 Kg BOD/Kg MLSS/Day.  At low temperatures, the performance decreases
rapidly as organic loading is increased (see chart below).

-------
               TEMPERATURE  EFFECTS OF LOADING ON  PERFORMANCE
   100-r
    90--
    80 —
 UJ
 I  70
 o

 UJ
 D-
    60 —
    50 --
    40
                           W_TEMPERATURE TREND
                                    s,
    LOW
TEMPERATURE
   DESIGN
   RANGE
   AVOID FOR
LOW TEMPERATURE
    DESIGN
      S
                                                                \
                  0.04
                 0.08
     0.12
0.16
0.20
                               ORGANIC LOAD Kg BOD
                                            Kg MLSS  DAY
For sewage temperatures of 7°C or less, no extended aeration plant should
be designed to operate at an organic loading above 0.08 Kg BOD/Kg MLSS/Day

Pilot extended aeration units treating domestic sewage at less than 8°C
operated satisfactorily at a MLSS concentration up to 4000 rng/1.  Levels
above this value have been reported by other investigators.

-------
SOLIDS SEPARATION


Solids separation is dependent upon both the biological and physical aspects
of the system.  Sludge, although it may bulk and lead to separation problems,
can be developed which will perform efficiently and produce non-turbid effluent
at temperatures <1°C.  A turbid effluent at cold temperatures, as at higher
temperatures, is caused by an unacclimated sludge or an organic loading rate
which is too high.   Under these conditions, a less stabilized sludge develops
with a corresponding relative decrease in numbers of stalked ciliates and an in-
crease of free swimming organisms which contributes to turbidity.  High loading
at low temperatures affects the separation process resulting in poor performance.

Tube settlers can provide effective solids separation for sludges with sludge
volume index (SVI)  ranging up to 250 at temperatures above 10°C.   They can also
be considered as a device for improving effluent quality during upsets in the
biological process or during peak flow rates.  Cleaning of the tubes is neces-
sary on a routine basis during normal operation with high MLSS concentration or
bulking sludges.  If a regular turnover of sludge in the tubes is not main-
tained by frequent cleaning, denitn'fication at temperatures greater than 8°C
can cause sludge to rise in the tubes and overflow in the effluent.  Tube
settlers also make it difficult to determine sludge blanket depth.

The performance of the upflow clarifier with tubes was comparable to the hori-
zontal flow clarifier at the EAFB pilot units.   Clarifier overflow rates should
be held below 12 lit/sq m/min (0.3 gal./sq ft/min) at low operating tempera-
tures on an average daily flow basis and 20 lit/sq m/min (0.5 gal./sq ft/min)
at peak flows.


SLUDGE WASTING


Careful attention to sludge wasting and disposal in cold climates for the exten-
ded aeration process is a necessity.  As the process temperature  decreases,
the excess sludge production increases and may reach 0.6 Kg SS/Kg BOD applied
below 7°C.  The standard wastage criteria of 0.5 Kg SS/Kg BOD applied is ade-
quate if 0.1 Kg SS/Kg BOD applied can be tolerated in the effluent.  MLSS
levels appear to be cyclic, thereby causing widely fluctuating effluent sus-
pended solids levels.  At low temperatures, this auto-induced sludge wastage
in the effluent can be expected to be more severe.  Sludge wasting and dis-
posal facilities or a polishing lagoon for effluent discharge should be
provided where necessary to protect receiving waters.  Larger extended aera-
tion units lacking wastage facilities should have a sand filter or micro-
screen for effluent filtration.


NUTRIENTS AND COLIFORM REMOVAL


At low temperatures, 6°C or less, there was no significant nitrogen removal
in the pilot extended aeration units.  Phosphorus removal was also insigni-
ficant, but appeared to be independent of temperature.  Total coliform
reduction at low temperatures, 10°C or less, was from 90-98 percent; similar
to warmer temperature expectations.

-------
                              SECTION III

                              INTRODUCTION
GENERAL


Alaska is the largest of the 50 United States.   It has varied climate in-
cluding arctic and subarctic zones where temperatures less than -45°C (-50°F)
are common in winter.  The population is small  and widespread with 302,000
people (based on the 1970 census) inhabiting 586,000 square miles of land
area.  Settled areas requiring domestic sewage  treatment include large muni-
cipalities, military installations, remote sites and villages, each of these
having different requirements and presenting different problems.

Construction and power costs in Alaska are very high and excessively so in
remote areas.  Skilled personnel  for operation  and treatment plants are
scarce or nonexistent.  Costs of shipping to Alaska are also very high and
increase with the degree of remoteness.

With increased development, population growth,  and a greater awareness of
environmental considerations, the problem of,waste disposal in Alaska is
assuming larger and larger proportions.  The effect of man's waste on the
arctic and subarctic ecosystems has received little attention in the past
and is not well understood.  Because of recent  increased interest in these
areas, some information is now becoming available on man's possible impact.
For example, in the winter, dissolved oxygen (DO) of ice-covered Alaskan
rivers may reach extremely low levels of 3 mg/1 or less under natural condi-
tions.  Because of the retarded ability of Alaskan streams to replenish
dissolved oxygen during the long winter period, it becomes essential that
the natural balance is not upset by man.  Under these conditions, the
best available waste treatment must be provided.

In discussing biological waste treatment processes, Alter (2) states,
"In view of present technology, aerobic processes appear to offer the
greatest promise for cold region sewage treatment."  The anaerobic process
is severely retarded at colder operating temperatures.  One of the major
advantages of biological processes is that the  greatest portion of the
energy required for treatment is supplied by the biological system itself,
thereby reducing shipping costs, etc., associated with materials required
for chemical treatment.  Aerated lagoons have proven suitable for facilities
where minimum attention is a requirement and sufficient and suitable land
area is available.  Extended aeration may be used where greater sophistica-
tion can be tolerated, suitable land area is not available, or greater
process control is required and appears to have great potential for reliable
and economical secondary treatment in Alaska.


SCOPE AND PURPOSE


This report describes investigations conducted  on bench scale units at the
Arctic Environmental Research Laboratory; at a  pilot plant located 22 miles

-------
S.E. of Fairbanks, at Eielson AFB and; at the College oxidation ditch.  The
research was concerned primarily with adapting methods developed in the
contiguous United States to the extreme climates found in Alaska, and
included investigations in the following areas:

1.  low temperature process performance

2.  low temperature solids separation

3.  degree of environmental protection required for equipment and processes

4.  aeration chamber mixing

5.  waste sludge production

The purpose of these research efforts was to develop adequate waste treat-
ment methods and design criteria for use under the extreme climatic condi-
tions found in the subarctic.  These methods would hopefully provide the
basis for facilities that were economical to construct, simple to operate,
and require as little maintenance as possible, while providing the desired
degree of treatment.


BASIC PROCESS DESCRIPTION


Stewart (3) defines activated sludge wastewater treatment as involving
"physical  and biological processes in a system having special configuration
and operation such that the wastewater is substantially purified and ren-
dered less reactive."  The basic activated sludge system includes an aeration
tank and settling tank, as shown in  Figure 1.  Untreated wastewater enters
the aeration tank where biologically degradable materials are stabilized by
microorganisms (activated sludge).  The aeration tank mixture (mixed liquor)
is  displaced to  the settling tank where the activated sludge settles to the
bottom and is returned to the aeration tank.  The treated wastewater leaves
the process as overflow from the settling tank.  Excess cell material pro-
duced is removed from the system either by deliberate wasting of sludge
or  unintentional wasting of suspended solids in the settling tank overflow.

Many variations  in the activated sludge process are possible and most of these
are described by Stewart (3).  Discussion here will be limited to the ex-
tended aeration  process which is a long detention form of the activated
sludge process.   In extended aeration the aeration tank detention may vary
from 1/2 to 3 days but is usually 1 day.

The design of activated sludge waste treatment processes basically requires
knowledge of three factors:  organism growth rate or process reaction time;
cell yield or excess sludge production; and endogenous respiration or auto-
oxidation rate.  Organism growth rate generally does not enter into design
considerations for the conventional or extended aeration activated sludge
treatment at normal temperatures because it is not a limiting factor in the
process.  Cell yield and auto-oxidation rate are utilized in the growth
kinetics equation as follows:

-------
Influent
Aeration
Chamber
        Air
                                                        Sludge Recycle
                                                                               Sedimentation
                                                                                   Basin
                                                                                               Effluent
                                                  FIGURE 1
                                                                               SIudge
                                                                               Waste
                                  BASIC ACTIVATED SLUDGE TREATMENT PROCESS

-------
     Kg excess volatile sludge = c(Kg BOD removed) - kjj
-------
                               SECTION IV

                         FACILITIES AND METHODS
COLD ROOM BENCH SCALE REACTORS


Controlled temperature laboratory studies, using bench scale activated
sludge units were conducted at the Arctic Environmental Research Labora-
tory from 1969 to 1971.

Initial activated sludge studies were carried out on a laboratory scale
using two cone reactors, manufactured by the Pope Scientific Company.  The
5 1/2-litev" units consisted of two concentric cones and a center tube as
shown in Figure 2.  Aeration and mixing were supplied by porous ceramic dif-
fusers which caused the mixed liquor to circulate around the inner cone.
Effluent rose through the center tube, 25 cm (10 in.) in length, where
solids separation took place.  The reactors were modified slightly to re-
place the original vacuum effluent drawoff design with an overflow device
as shown.  Effluent was collected in plastic containers.  Holter Perfusion
Roller Pumps were used for feeding.   The feed rate of these purnps could be
varied from 0.33 to 1600 ml/min with a full scale accuracy within +_  1 per-
cent.  These units had two pumping tubes which permitted simultaneous pumping
from two sources.

The reactors were fed from 76-liter (20-gal. ) plastic containers as  shown
and the feed kept uniformly mixed with a paddle-type mixer.  The desired
mixed liquor temepratures were maintained by placing the equipment in
refrigerated, walk-in, constant temperature rooms.

A 33.7-liter (8.9-gal.) activated sludge reactor, as shown in Figure 3,
was fabricated to study settling characteristics of settling tubes (clari-
fiers) at controlled temperatures.  The Neptune Microfloc Company developed
tube settlers for use in water treatment and has conducted studies to evalu-
ate them for use in activated sludge separation (4).  A schematic of the
reactor and associated equipment is shown in Figure 4.  Two settling tubes
were provided, each 5 cm (2 in.) square and 1.2 m (48 in.) long and  inclined
at an angle of 60 degrees.   Each tube also had an effluent drawoff.  The
reactor was designed to provide a circulation pattern sweeping down  in front
of the tubes to carry the settled sludge away.  A tank of approximately 230
liters (60 gal.) was constructed for feeding the reactor and the contents
kept completely mixed with a circulating pump, drawing from near the bottom
of the tank and returning to the bottom of the hopper, as shown.  During
periods when the cold room temperatures were increased above 4°C, the feed
tank contents were kept cool with a Blue M refrigeration unit.  Holter
pumps were used for feeding the reactor and for controlling the effluent
flow from the settling tubes.

A second reactor of 47.1 liters (12.5 gal.) was fabricated to further
study tube settler characteristics and is shown in Figures 5 and 6.  The
settling portion of the reactor consists of one 10 cm x 8.9 cm x 1.8 m
(4 in.  x 5 in.  x 70 in.  long) tube with an individual drawoff and two


                                    10

-------
                                            Reactor
    Mixer
                    Holter  Perfusion
                    Roller  Feed  Pump
                               Moi sture
                               Trap
                                                                Effluent
                                                                Holding
                                                                  Tank
                                                             Concentric Cones
                                FIGURE 2

                             CONE REACTORS*
                         SCHEMATIC OF APPARATUS
manufactured by Pope Scientific

-------
145cm
                                            Effluent
                                      Influent
                                        Air
                                                         10.
                                                         cm

                                                          5cm]
Effluent
                                                    -J_J
                                                      -10cnr-H
                          FIGURE 3
           33.7-LITER  (8.9-GALLON)  REACTOR DETAILS
                                 12

-------
                                              To  Aeration  Chamber
CO
'
Ref ri ger-
ation
Unit

—


[



t
•*m
Feed =
Tank H
<••
••
       Mixing
         Pump
                                      Settling
                                         Tubes
Holter
Perfus
Roller
Feed
                           V30  Liter
                                          Pump
                       Air  Supply
~

••••••.
r
si
r


""S
on
-*i
-»
-— (
^
1
^
\J
Effluent
Pump
(Holter)

V
i

f> i
Efflue
Recycl
Pump
(Holte

r
nt
o
r)
Effluent
Tanks
                                     Moisture
                                       Trap
        Reactor
       Plexiglas
                                   Effluent
                                   Overflow
                                   Line
                                                                                                     Reactor
                                                                                                    Side View
                                                      FIGURE  4
                                          33.7-LITER  (8.9-GALLON)  REACTOR
                                               SCHEMATIC  OF  APPARATUS

-------
               Bypass channel  for circulation  through
               back channel  and under  tubes
                              //    Return
                                        •>
                                      ^
                                  Effluent
                              Air
                                                      157 cm
Jt
                                                         cm
                                              8.9-
                                              cm
                Figure  5
47.1-LITER (12.5-GALLON) REACTOR DETAILS
                   14

-------
Refrigera-
tion Unit
Effluent
  Pump
(Holter
                                                        Effluent
                                                          Tank
                                                        10 cm
                                                          Tube
            Air Supply
                               Moisture
                                 Trap
                                                                                          1-hr  timer
                                                                                     	D
                                                                                    Solenoid Valves
                       Solenoid Va
                      	D
                                                                                           24-hr
                                                                                           Timer
                                                                               Recycle
                                                                               Pump  (Holter)
                         Effluent Tank
                         5  cm  Tubes
                                             FIGURE 6
                                 47.1-LITER (12.5 GALLON)  REACTOR
                                      SCHEMATIC OF APPARATUS

-------
5 cm x 8.9 cm x 1.8 m (2 in.  x 3.5 in.  x 70 in.) long tubes with a common
effluent drawoff.   This reactor was fed in parallel  with the other tube
settler reactor from the same feed tank.  HoHer pumps were used for feed
and to control  the effluent rates.

The cone reactors  were monitored primarily for biokinetic information and
samples collected  on Monday,  Wednesday and Friday.   Routine analyses in-
cluded influent and effluent  BOD's, mixed liquor and effluent suspended
solids (SS), and volatile suspended solids (VSS).  Nutrient analyses were
made on the influent and effluent samples on a weekly basis during the
second half of the study period and included ammonia, nitrite, nitrate,
and organic nitrogen, and total and orthophosphates.

Feed consisted of  effluent from the Eielson Air Force Base primary treatment
plant.  The feed was brought  to the Laboratory in 19-liter (5-gal.) con-
tainers and held in the constant temperature room overnight before feeding.
Samples were taken of the feed tank contents immediately after feeding, again
before the next feeding, and  the two results averaged to provide influent
data for the sampling period.  Effluent was collected in the plastic con-
tainers and samples taken at  the end of the sampling period.

Essentially, the same procedures were followed with the tube settler reactors
as with the cone reactor units with the exception that sampling was done on
a daily basis.   Feed consisted of effluent from the Eielson Air Force Base
primary plant which was brought to the laboratory in 57-liter (15-gal.) con-
tainers and held overnight in a cold room at 1°C before feeding.  Samples
were collected 7 days per week at the beginning of the study and reduced
to 5 days per week later.  BOD and COD analyses were run routinely on the
influent and effluent samples and Tuesdays and Thursdays on the reactor
mixed liquor samples.  Suspended solids and volatile suspended solids were
performed daily on the influent and mixed liquor samples.  Suspended solids
analyses only were performed  on the effluent because of difficulty in ob-
taining reliable VSS figures  at low concentrations.   Total solids and total
volatile solids analyses were done on the mixed liquor only.  Effluent for
each sample period was collected in 114-liter (30-gal.) plastic containers.
After sampling, the effluent containers were emptied and collection for the
next sample period begun.

A limited number of nutrient and coliform determinations were made on the
influent and effluent samples at times consistent with the study schedules
of the reactors.  Microscopic examinations of the reactor contents were
made on irregular basis at times when apparent or suspected changes in the
mixed liquor had occurred.  The examinations consisted of general observa-
tions on the relative quantities of protozoa present and the degree of ac-
tivity.  BOD, COU, and solids analyses were done in accordance with Standard
Methods procedures (5).  Coliform counts were made by the membrane filter
method as described in Standard Methods and nutrient analyses made in accor-
dance with Federal Water Quality Administration Standards  (6).
                                   16

-------
EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE PILOT PLANTS


In cooperation with the Alaskan Air Command, the Arctic Environmental Re-
search Laboratory constructed and operated a pilot waste treatment facility
at Eielson Air Force Base (EAFB).  The facility included an aerated lagoon
and an extended aeration basin.  The purpose of this facility was to in-
crease the knowledge of biological waste treatment at cold temperatures and
to develop design criteria.

EAFB is located 35 Km  (22 miles) southeast of Fairbanks and has a similar
subarctic climate.  The mean annual temperature at Fairbanks is approximately
4°C (25°F) with a minimum and maximum recorded temperatures of 55°C (66°F)
and 38°C  (+99°F), respectively  (7).  The area has approximately 200 days
per year with temperatures below freezing (0°C).

The initial extended aeration pilot plant studies conducted at EAFB were
performed in a 570-cu m (^150,000-gal.), inverted, truncated
pyramidal basin with low sloping sidewalls.   The side slope ratio was 1:2
(8).  Two submerged tube settler modules, 1.2 x 1.5 m (4 x 5 ft) surface
area, were used as the sludge separation and return devices.  Because of
extreme subarctic winter conditions, tube settler modules were much under-
sized in  comparison to the aeration basin.  Operating these settler modules
at an overflow rate of 20 lit/sq m/min (0.5 gal/sq ft/min) limited the
hydraulic detention to a minimum of approximately 5 days, causing excessive
icing problems in a basin with  such a large exposed surface-to-volume ratio.
Because of the many operational problems associated with this system, it was
decided to use a more conventional configuration for pilot extended aeration
units.

A  large,  concrete, vertical  wall tank, 9 x 9 x 4.6 m (30 x 30 x 15 ft) deep
nominal dimensions, was divided into two equal-size pilot extended aeration
treatment units  (Figure 7).  The units were sized to operate any nominal
detention from 1/4 to 4 days, and were differentiated by the clarifier
design.   The south unit had a conventional horizontal flow type clarifier.
The north unit, hereafter called the up side, had a rectangular upflow type
clarifier with tubes.  Aeration in the up side was provided by 27 Walker
process (W.P.) "monospargers."  The monospargers were set up in such a way
(Figure 7) that either 1/3,  2/3 or all could be operated at any one time.
Sludge return was accomplished  by means of 10-cm (4-in.) and 15-cm (6-in.)
air lifts.  Suction for the 10-cm air lift was taken from the bottom of the
hoppers in the clarifier, one hopper per each airlift.   The 15-cm auxilary
airlifts which did not have suction manifolds were provided to remove any
heavy sludge concentrations below the tubes. The flow pattern in the up
side (Figures 7, 8 and 9) was such that the mixed liquor flows over the
surface of the clarifier in three horizontal troughs, down behind the tube
section in a downflow channel,  exiting just below the tubes but above the
hoppers.  Heavy suspendeds immediately fall  into the hoppers and effluent
flows up  through the tubes.   Sludge that falls into the hoppers is collected
by the airlifts and returned to the aeration basin.  Above the tubes, ef-
fluent is collected in a submerged manifold.  The section above the tubes
was divided into three parts for the purpose of backwashing the tubes,  1/3
at a time.  During a backwash cycle, approximately 1 hour per day, effluent
is drawn  through 2/3 of the tubes to backwash the other 1/3.

                                   17

-------
                                          4.6 n  (15')
                                  3.4 m (IT)
                                                                                             Horizontal M.L. Feed Slot

                                                                                                     Horizontal Clarifier
10 CM (4") 0
Airlifts (2)
   co
                                                                                                        . 10 cm (4") 0 Sludge
                                                                                                             Collector

                                                                                                    Horizontal Effluent Box

                                                                                                   _ 5 cm  (2") 0 Feed Pipes (2)
       HORIZONTAL
        AERATION
          BASIN
                                                                                                        Effluent Line
                                                                                                   .L. Down Flow Channel
                       Air Tipe
                      and  Valves
 10 cm (4") 0 Sludge
Collection and Return
                                                                                    M.L. Feed Troughs (3)
                                                                                        Pipes (3)
                 FIGURE 7.  EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE EXTENDED AERATION  PILOT  PLANTS

-------
        Air Headers and Piping
                 .10 cm (4") Air Lift (2)
                                                20  cm  (8")  Concrete Wall
                                                    Floatable Col lection  Behind
                                                          Plywood Sheets  (2)
                        ,  AERATION
                       ,™     BASIN
            "Shear Box
             Aerators
              O-HD
0 cm (4")  Sludge Return Lines' (2)

                       HORIZONTAL  SIDE  SECTION  AA
                                                                         Clarifier
                                                                         Feed Slot
      Air Headers
        and Piping
                                       20 cm (8").Concrete Wall
                                            o   /      Backwash  (3)  and  Effluent
                                              /      //Collector  (3)  Pipes
                       != -
                        CM
           t
           '
            'Mono  Spager"
              Air  Pipes
            Aerators
                   r
                   '
                              AERATION
                                BASIN
                         Air  Lift  (2)
 10  cm (4")  Sludge  Return  Lines  (2
                                           $
                                                        Feed Trough
                                                         8_  8
                                                                          M.L.  Down
                                                                            Flow
                                                                           Channel

                                                                          Effluent
                                                                         Connections
                                                                          Not  Shown
                                                                          0  cm  (4")
                                                                         "Effluent
                                                                          with  2
                                         15 cm (6")  Auxilary  Air  Lift     Heat  Trace
                                                       (2'                  Lines
                               UP SIDE SECTION BB

FIGURE 8.   EIELSOIJ  AIR FORCE  BASE EXTENDED  AERATION  PLANTS —SECTIONS
                                        19

-------
Air to
Aerators

and Air-
lift
Pumps
      01
      O)
      OJ
      en
      03
     OO
                 Complete Mix (CM)
         Down Flow
         Channel
\/
	 •
'





\
Lr
f Complete
/ x Mix (CM)
/ i
OJ
-a" AUX.
2 AERATION CELL Air-
lift
/Air Lift Pumps
>r Aerators T*
| Returning
v J Sludge









Effluent to
Col lection
~~"~"~"- Tube
^^ Settlers ^, .
l\v
\ ^


/
/ Sludge / -
_J3ol lection'
                                                             Effluent Line
              AERATION  CELL WITH TUBE SETTLER CLARIFIER

                         PROCESS FLOW SECTION
  Sewage
  Feed
AERATION
  CELL
Complete
                                            Wastage
                Mix
                                Return  Sludae
                                                    Clear Effluent
 Upside
Clarifier
                             FLOU SCHEMATIC

                               FIGURE 9

                  UPSIDE EXTENDED AERATION PILOT UNIT
                                   20

-------
Feed rates were held constant.  To create an artificially high overflow rate,
effluent was taken from the clarifiers and pumped back into the aeration
basin.  The artificial  overflow rate plus the effluent rate equalled the
total overflow rate.

Initially, raw sewage was used as feed to the extended aeration units.  Two
5-cm  (2-in.) trash pumps pumped from the aerated grid chamber of the Air
Base's existing primary plant to a flow equalizer cooling pond.  From the
cooling pond, the sewage was pumped at a constant rate with variable speed
pumps to the extended aeration units.  A cooling pond level control acti-
vated the 5-cm trash pumps in the sewage plant.  In late October 1971,
due to considerable trash pump clogging and down time caused by the raw
sewage feed, it was decided to use primary effluent as feed.  The trash
pumps were then moved to the end of the primary plant's clarifiers.  In
late  December 1971, it was realized that the cold air did not have enough
heat  absorption capacity to cool the sewage down to 5°C at flow rates
through the feed equalizer cooling pond.  A spray system was added to this
pond  which caused considerable ice masses but kept the feed temperature at
5°C or below.  Feed (cooled primary effluent in this case) was introduced
into  the complete mix aeration basins (Figure 7) near the common corner of
the basins and clarifiers.  Flow rates to the units were varied from 76 to
150 cu m/day (20,000 to 40,000 gal./day).  Flow splitting, control and moni-
toring were accomplished with valves and venturi meters.

In the horizontal flow side mixed liquor was circulated by the aerators and
flowed into the horizontal flow clarifier (Figures 7, 8 and 10) through
the horizontal  mixed-liquor feed hole and slot.  Sludge was collected by a
10-cm (4-in.) manifold in the bottom of each of the two hoppers and re-
turned to the aeration basin by 10-cm airlifts.  Effluent and artificial
overflow was collected near the surface at the end of the horizontal flow
clarifier.  Artificial  overflow was created in the same manner as for the
upflow section.  Aeration in the horizontal side aeration section was ac-
complished by means of 30 Chicago Pump (C.P.) shearfuser aeration boxes
which were divided into 2/3 and 1/3 sections such that the air rate would
be varied over a wide range.  As can be seen in Figures 7 and 10, the aera-
tion  basins and clarifiers shared common walls.  The basin walls were
reinforced concrete.  All air lift sludge returns were mounted in the
aeration basins, the end of their discharge pipes terminated just at
water level.  Air lines were steel pipes while sludge and airlift pipes
were  plastic.  The 60° sludge hoppers were sheet metal.  Dead volume
between hopper and concrete walls was filled with sand.  The horizontal
flow clarifier feed slot, as shown in Figure 8, is about 3.05 decimeters
(1 ft) high and consists of vertical 2.5 x 15 cm (1 x 6 in.) wood slats
placed 5 cm (2 in.) on center.

The aeration basins of both units were exposed to the environment.  The
clarifier sections were housed in an insulated, unheated A-frame building.
During extreme cold periods (<-40°C or °F), limited heat was applied to
prevent freezing of the sampling systems.  The A-frame was an equilaterial
triangle covering both clarifiers, approximately 3.7 x 9.2 m long  (12 x
30 ft).  The A's were 5 x 15 cm x 3.7 m, 0.6 m on centers  (2x6 in. x
12 ft, 24 in. on centers).  Roof panels were of sandwich construction with
                                   21

-------
  Air  to
  Aerators
         t
  and  Air-
  lift
  pumps
  Sewage
  Feed
               Return
               Sludge
                       -*•

                       —»-
                    COMPLETE MIX
                    AERATION CELL

                   Air Lift Pumps
                   Aerators
                              Returning
                              Sludge
                           Effluent Collectior
                            HORIZONTAL FLOW
                               CLARIFIER
             Sludge Collection
'6C
                                               Effluent Line
            AERATION CELL WITH HORIZONTAL FLOW CLARIFIER
                        PROCESS FLOW SECTION
Sewage
Feed
AERATION
  CELL
Complete Mix
                              Return Sludge
                                                   Wastage
                                                   Clear Effluent
HORIZONTAL
FLOW BASIN
(Clarifier)
                           FLOW SCHEMATIC

            HORIZONTAL FLOW EXTENDED AERATION PILOT UNIT


                             Figure 10
                                  22

-------
5 cm (2 in.) of urethane foam between two 1.2 x 2.4 m (4x8 ft) plywood
sheets.

Feed and effluent samples were 24-hour composites, composited on the basis
of time and flow.  Mixed liquor suspended solids were always grab samples.
From start-up in September to early November 1971, the BOD and COD analyses
were run once per week and suspended solids run once or twice per week.
Starting in November 1971, COD and suspended solids analyses were run three
times per week.  BOD's were always run once per week.  In December 1971, the
mixed liquor suspended solids were run daily and effluent suspended solids
were also run daily shortly thereafter.  Starting the week of January 10,
1972, feed and effluent COD's were taken daily and frozen on the site.  BOD's
and volatile suspended solids were run only on Wednesdays.  Effluent BOD's
and percent removals for all weekdays except Wednesdays were based upon
daily COD's and the COD/BOD ratio as calculated weekly from the Wednesday's
samples.  The following parameters were measured daily:  2-liter settlo-
meter tests at 5, 15, 30 and 60 minutes; outside ambient temperatures;
airflow and pressure; and sludge wastage pump rates.  Feed rates were
recorded and adjusted daily.  Rhodamine  (R-HB) dye was injected with the
feed to qualitatively define flow patterns.

BOD and solids analyses were begun within 4 hours of sample collection.
COD samples were usually frozen until enough samples were accumulated for
economical analysis.  All analyses were performed in accordance with Standard
Methods (5) and/or FWPCA-Methods for Chemical Analysjs of_ Water and Wastes
(6).               —__

The analytical data for the EAFB pilot units are summarized in a computer
printout which may be obtained by contacting the author.  This printout
contains listings, daily in some cases, from September 1971 to May 1972,
of process parameters and chemical analyses.  The tabulated parameters are:
feed strength: total coliforms, BOD, and COD; organic loading and detention:
mass BOD/mass MLSS/day and days; mixed liquor; solids temperature, DO,
settling rate, age, and wastage; clarifier loadings, lit/sq m/min.; effluent
strength and removals:  total coliform, BOD, COD, and solids.  Weekly COD
to BOD ratios and major perturbations are also listed.


OXIDATION DITCHES
There  is only one oxidation ditch in Alaska for which any performance data
are available.  This ditch, owned and operated by College Utilities Corp.,
is 4 miles west of Fairbanks and serves the University of Alaska, an ele-
mentary school, and a residential area.  This ditch is exposed to the
environment and has a volume of 1200 cu m  (0.3 MG) at a depth of 1.3 m  (4.:
ft).   The clarifier is enclosed in an unheated building and has a sludge
return, but no wastage system.  A housing  has been provided over the two
rotors.  A diagram of this oxidation ditch is shown in Figure 11.

Performance data for this ditch were extracted from the reports of Grube
and Murphy  (9) and Murphy and Ranganathan  (10).  Their analytical methods
                                   23

-------
LT>
o

-------
were performed in accordance with Standard^ Methods_ procedures (5), and
with the use of an electronic DO instrument.

The Minnesota Department of Health has reported on an oxidation ditch under
cold temperature conditions.  This ditch serves the city of Glenwood which
is located about 120 miles northwest of Minneapolis.  The ditch loop was
build in a horseshoe shape; total loop length was about 386 m (1265 ft).
The ditch was 3.8 m (12.5 ft) wide at the bottom and 5.6 m (18.5 ft) wide
at the surface at the nominal 0.9 m  (3 ft) operating depth.  Total capacity
at operating depth was 1700 cu m (0.44 MG).

Performance data for this ditch were extracted from the Department of Health
report (11).
                                   25

-------
                               SECTION V

                       OPERATION AND PERFORMANCE
COLD ROOM REACTORS
Results of operation of the bench scale cone reactors are summarized in
Tables 1 and 2<  Filtered effluent represents the effluent sample run
through a filter pad (used in separation of membrane filter pads in pack-
aging) which was coarse enough to leave bacteria for seed in BOD determi-
nations yet reduce the suspended solids to essentially zero.  BOD deter-
minations on the filtered effluent samples were performed to obtain a
rough determination of the amount of dissolved organic material removed.

Both biological sludges were relatively easy to establish.  The 6.5°C
reactor had been operating for approximately 6 months before this series
of sampling was begun.   The reactor, operating at 1.3°C, was placed in
operation approximately 6 weeks before sampling began and seeded with
material that had been aerated in the cold room in a 19-liter (5-gal.)
container which was batch fed periodically with domestic sewage.  The reac-
tor runs were started with the longest detention time first and the times
decreased in chronological order.  The 1.3°C reactor did not become stabi-
lized until the shorter detention times were reached, as evidenced by the
MLSS buildup as time progressed.

There was apparently little difference in the biological activity at the
two temperatures; however, operation of the reactor at 6.5°C was more
erratic.  These reactors were operated with a clarifier overflow rate
less than 7.1 lit/sq m/min (0.17 gal./sq ft/min).  Both reactors generally
practiced "autoinduced sludge wasting" in the same manner as the College
Utilities oxidation ditch as described by Grube and Murphy (1).  The MLSS
would build up to a point and begin to pass solids for 1 or 2 days and
then repeat the cycle.   The cycle was repeated with 2 to 3 weeks as op-
posed to the monthly occurrences reported by Grube and Murphy.

The reactors differed in their manner of passing solids, with the 1.3°C
reactor generally having a much more turbid effluent and the 6.5°C reactor
having a relatively clear effluent.  Heavy solids passed from the 6.5°C
reactor by rising in the settling tube as a solid mass.   As the concentra-
tion of solids in the mixed liquor increased, the level  of solids in the
settling tube would rise until spilling over into the effluent tank.  After
passing an undetermined amount of solids, the cycle would be repeated.  A
gradual drop in pH was noted in the 6.5°C unit as the suspended solids be-
gan to build before discharging.  The pH dropped from slightly above 7 to
values of 6.6 to 6.7.  The pH of the 1.3°C unit consistently remained
around 7.4.

The 6.5°C effluent solids settled to the bottom of the effluent tank
leaving a clear liquid above; whereas, the 1.3°C effluent solids did not
settle out to any degree.  As the 1.3°C reactor became more stabilized,
                                   26

-------
                                 TABLE 1
                               DATA SUMMARY

                            1.3°C Cone Reactor
                      Feed:  Primary Plant Effluent
Detention
  Time (hrs)

Influent
  BOD (mg/1)

Reactor
  Susp. Solids (mg/1)
  Volatile Susp.
    Solids (mg/1 )

Filtered Effluent
  BOD (mg/1)
  % BOD Removal

Unfiltered Effluent
  Susp. Solids (mg/1)
  BOD (mg/1)
  % BOD Removal

Loading Factor
  Kg BOD Feed
  Kg MLVSS-DAY

Clarifier Overflow
  rate 1iter/nr min
  (gal/ft  min)
21
111
1074
890
37
66
29
40
64
15
170
1561
1324
11
93
43
62
64
13
201
2657
2212
20
90
38
28
86
9
184
2926
2402
14
92
82
44
76
 0.14
0.21
 3.0          4.1
(0.074)       (0.10)
0.17
              4.9
             (0.12)
0.20
             6.9
            (0.17)
                                   27

-------
                                 TABLE 2
                               DATA SUMMARY

                            6.5°C Cone Reactor
                      Feed:  Primary Plant Effluent
Detention
  Time (hrs)

Influent
  BOD (mg/1)

Reactor
  Susp. Solids (mg/1)
  Volatile Susp.
    Solids (mg/1)

Filtered Effluent
  BOD (mg/1)
  % BOD Removal

Unfiltered Effluent
  Susp. Solids (mg/1)
  BOD (mg/1)
  %BOD Removal

Loading Factor
  Kg BOD Feed
17
139
2346
1915
51.3
63
11
53
62
15
132
1885
1563
16.3
88
69
36
73
13
153
1880
1587
13.3
91
96
31
80
9
155
2285
1801
11.7
92
45
33
79
Kg MLVSS Day
arifier Overflow
rate Liter/m^min
(gal/ft^ min)
0.10
3.7
(0.091 )
0.14
4.1
(0.10)
0.18
4.9
(0.12)
0.23
6.9
(0.11)
                                   28

-------
the effluent became less turbid and the MLSS began to increase.  The 6.5°C
reactor operation was less stable, with the maximum level of MLSS generally
not rising above 2300 mg/1 as opposed to 3000 mg/1 for the 1.3°C reactor.

Overall results of operation of the 33.7-liter and the 47.1-liter tube set-
tler reactors are presented in Tables 3 and 4.  These reactors were operated
at 12 and 24 hour hydraulic detention times with daily sludge wasting to
maintain the MLSS at 4000 mg/1.  Sludge wasting was accomplished by drawing
off the required amount of mixed liquor, a portion of which was used for a
solids analysis to determine the exact amount of solids removed.  Loading
and wastage values are approximate since they do not reflect the variable
quantity of solids in the clarifier.  Clarifier overflow rates were varied
from 4 to 35 lit/sq m/min (0.1 to 0.8 gal./sq ft/min) by pumping some of
the effluent back into the mixed liquor.

Effluent BOD and COD values of 9 to 21 mg/1 and 46 to 96 mg/1, respectively,
indicate that a considerable amount of biological activity takes place at
low operating temperatures.  Effluent organics were well stabilized as indi-
cated by the high COD/BOD ratios which varied from 7.7 to 3.7.  These com-
pared with influent COD/BOD ratios of 1.8 to 1.-5.  Amounts of sludge wasted
varied from 0.42 mg suspended solids/mg BOD removed at the low temperatures
to 0.14 at 10.5°Caid 24-hour detention time.  The pH of both reactors ranged
from 7.2 to 7.6 during the sample periods reported.


EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE UNITS
Organic removal performance of the EAFB extended aeration units is sum-
marized in Figure 12 for the horizontal flow clarifier, and Figure 13
for the upflow clarifier side.  These  graphs, percent BOD removal, and
temperature vs. date, include a running account of the operational pertur-
bations to which the systems were subjected.  The data are broken down into
three periods:  a high and low temperature range at a high organic loading,
and a low temperature range at a low organic loading.

These data periods were selected to arbitrarily exclude unsteady state con-
ditions due to startup, and the changing of major operational parameters
such as detention time and temperature.  Rhodamine-B dye, which was in-
jected to define flow patterns, tended to upset the system.  Most of the
dye poison data, when effluent BOD was greater than feed BOD, was excluded
in the period III summary for the up side.

The dates of the time periods for steady state analyses are:

Period/temperature/1oading      Horizontal side          Up side	

    I/7-19°C/High            10-25-71  to 12-21-71   10-25-71 to 12-21-71

    II/2-9°C/High            1-20-72 to 2-26-72     2-1-72 to 2-26-72

    III/l-8°C/Low            3-23-72 to 5-1-72      3-20-72 to 4-20-72
                                   29

-------
                                  TABLE 3
                SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF 33.7-LITER REACTOR AND
                   47.1-LITER REACTOR AT 12 HR DETENTION

                       Feed:  Primary Plant Effluent
Reactor MLSS
     % vss
     BOD
     COD
    (mg/1)
REACTOR TEMPERATURE (AVG°C)
0.6
4160
80
2489
5648
2.9
4097
80
2503
5788
3.8
4076
81
1477
5260
8.0
3737
80
1299
4705
Loading:
Kg Infl.  BOD
Kg MLVSS-Day
0.12
0.10
0.10
0.14
Sludge Wasted:
                   mg MLSS
                mg BOD Removed
                             0.42
            0.33
            0.32
Unfiltered Effluent
     Suspended Solids (mg/1)
     BOD (mg/1)
     BOD Removal  (%)
     COD (mg/1)
     COD Removal  (%)

COD/BOD Ratio
     Influent
     Effluent
     Reactor
                            18
                            21
                            89
                            78
                            76
                             1.7
                             4.2
                             2.3
            3
           13
           92
           46
           73
            1.7
            4.3
            2.3
           12
           17
           90
           67
           78
            1.8
            4.0
            3.6
            0.33
            5
            9
           96
           96
           83
            1.5
            6.3
            3.6
                                      30

-------
                               TABLE 4


               SUMMARY OF RESULTS OF 33.7-LITER REACTOR
                         AT 24-HOUR DETENTION
Reactor MLSS
     % vss
     BOD
     COD
    (mg/1)
REACTOR
1.9
2595
83
1693
3712
TEMPERATURE
6.8
3872
83
2105
5019
(AVG°C)
10.5
3896
82
1808
5178
Loading:
Kg Infl. BOD
Kg MLVSS-Day
                                          0.09
            0.07
            0.07
Sludge Wasted:
                    mg MLSS
                mg BOD Removed
                                 0.42
            0.16
            0.14
Unfiltared Effluent
     Suspended Solids
     BOD (mg/1)
     BOD Removal (%)
     COD (mg/1)
     COD Removal (%)

COD/BOD Ratio
     Influent
     Effluent
     Reactor
             (mg/1)
 3
14
93
51
83
                                 1.5
                                 3.7
                                 2.2
 4
10
95
53
84
            1.5
            5.3
            2.4
 6
10
95
69
80
            1.6
            7.7
            2.9
                                 31

-------
PAGE NOT
AVAILABLE
DIGITALLY

-------
PAGE NOT
AVAILABLE
DIGITALLY

-------
The high loading rate was achieved by use of a 1/2-day hydraulic detention.
Operating temperatures fluctuated from about 18°C to 7°C from October 4,
1971, to January 3, 1972, depending upon ambient temperature and cooling
pond efficiency.  After converting to a spray-type cooling pond, the aera-
tion basin temperatures ran from 2-9°C at the higher loading, period II,
and from 1-8°C at the lower loading, period III.

For period I (Figures 12 and 13) performance of both units is about com-
parable and averages above 80 percent BOD removal.  Intentional wastage
of mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS) in early November seems to have
improved performance.  Starvation (lack of feed) and lower mixed liquor
temperatures in late December appeared to reduce performance on both sides.

For period II, data from January 1 to about January 23, 1972, are considered
to be transitional  (unsteady state).  The up side 15 cm air lifts were not
working during the  transition period.  For the rest of period II, the up
side performance is very poor as compared to the horizontal side; in fact,
the up side effluent BOD was usually larger than the influent; i.e., losing
activated sludge.

The feed rate was reduced by approximately 1/2 on February 26, 1972, but not
until March 20, did the performance for both sides improve.  From then on,
the performance ranged from 75 to 96 percent BOD removal except for dye
poisoning.  The horizontal side performed slightly better, probably due
to the ability of its clarifier to retain a higher MLSS.

Figures  14 and  15 are chronological  plots of mixed  liquor  and effluent  sus-
pended solids.   Intentional wastage  of MLSS is  indicated on  these graphs.

The mixed liquor suspended solids fluctuated more widely than did the BOD
removal.  The drops in biomass population (MLSS) were due to the intentional
wastage of the mixed liquor or to autoinduced wastage out of the clarifier.
The bacterial population seems to follow the conventional sigmoidal  eco-
logical cycle, where the population  (activated sludge biomass) increases
until some force triggers its decline.  Starvation may also alter biomass
settleability.

After intentional wastage of mixed liquor (November 1-5), the biomass usual-
ly recovered quickly, as can be seen in Figure 14.  The up side MLSS did not
appear to recover as well as shown in Figure 15.  After the December wastage,
the MLSS for the horizontal side did not recover for the rest of period II.
Autoinduced wastage kept the MLSS <3,000 mg/1.

The effect of the auxiliary 15-cm airlift is shown in the data for the  up
side on Figure 15.  The airlift was off (air line frozen) from about
January 1 to January 23, 1972, and the aeration basin mixed liquor suspen-
ded solids during that time dropped to less than 300 mg/1.  Essentially, all
the MLSS was stored beneath the tubes.  The airlift problem was the reason
period II data analysis for the up side did not start until February 1.

After switching to  the 1-day detention (period  III) on  February 25, 1972,  it
took approximately  3-4 weeks for the horizontal side mixed liquor suspended
                                    34

-------
PAGE NOT
AVAILABLE
DIGITALLY

-------
PAGE NOT
AVAILABLE
DIGITALLY

-------
solids to build up to a good operating level of about 3,000 mg/1 as shown
in Figure 14.  It took a longer time for the up side biomass to reach that
level, Figure 15.

The upflow clarifier did not appear to perform as well as the horizontal
flow clarifier in period III and was sporadically passing solids causing
effluent suspended solids levels to vary from 20 to 100 mg/1.  For the
horizontal flow side, Figure 14, the effluent suspended solids were gener-
ally below 40 mg/1.

In late April, the effect of autoinduced sludge wastage is apparent in the
up side, Figure 15.  This wastage may have been triggered by the Rhodamine-
B dye which was injected on April 6 and April 16.  Both units were shut
down on May 1, 1972.
OXIDATION DITCHES


Grube and Murphy  (9) reported consistent removal efficiencies exceeding 90
percent at liquid temperatures of 2°C and air temperatures ranging down to
-49°C (-58°F) for the College oxidation ditch.  Detention time in the clari-
fier was established at 5 hours through a dye study.  Retention times in
the ditch averaged 2.3 days.  No ice cover was reported at any time except
during mid-January and early February when transient skim ice formed ahead
of the rotor.  Ice formation on the rotors did become a problem but was
eliminated by hanging rubber mats from the rotor housing to 5 cm (2 in.)
above the liquid  surface.   Influent temperatures averaged 16.6°C with a
minimum of 7.5°C.

Monthly autoinduced sludge  wasting was reported with the MLSS of the ditch
increasing gradually for 3-4 weeks with the effluent suspended solids re-
maining low.  At  an undefined maximum mixed liquor concentration, a large
mass of solids was discharged for 1 to 2 days and the cycle repeated.  Dis-
charged solids showed good  settleability and produced no odor.  The cause
of the discharge  was not known.

All reported information for this ditch is summarized in Table 5.  Apparent-
ly sampling from  1967 through 1969 and 1972 did not catch the effluent when
solids were being passed due to autoinduced wastage or operational  upsets.
The 1969 data are unpublished and supplied by the Institute of Water Re-
sources, University of Alaska.  They are from grab samples that were collec-
ted from one to six times per month, but in most cases, weekly.  The 1972
data was unpublished data supplied by College Utilities Corporation and are
from grab samples that were collected, generally once every other week.

For the January through March 1971 data, 2 of the 23 sampling dates have ef-
fluent BOD's greater than feed (raw sewage) BOD's.  Three of the 17 effluent
BOD's are greater than corresponding feed BOD's for the May through July
1971  data.

All the sample sets except  two were grab.  Sludge return line plugging and
anaerobic activity in the ditch may have been responsible for the poor May
                                    37

-------
                                         TABLE 5

                             OXIDATION DITCH—COLLEGE,  ALASKA
                                 AVERAGE PERFORMANCE  DATA
                   Ditch   Liquid
                                                                   Overflow

Date: Mb/Yr
(1 nO/67-3/68
^4/69-12/69
(3)
v '1/71-3/71
{3)5/71-7/71
^6/72-11/72
Detn.
Days
2.0+_
	
1.0+_
1.8+
0.9+
Temp.
°C
10-11
11-20
8-14
16-20
14-19
%BOD MLSS
Removal mg/1
92 1700
9r5^ 2800
52(4'5) 1600
9(4'5) 4500(6)
(5)
82^ ' 4260
Percent L "•«"»' """
Volatile (gal /fr /day)
6.8 (240)
—
71 13 (470)
50 7.3 (260)
15+_ (530+)
Effluent
SS mg/1
21
18
222(4)
588(4)
35
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Grube, G. A. (1)
Unpublished Data, compliments of Institute of Water Resources,  University .of Alaska
Ranganathan, D. R.,  and Murphy, R.  S.  (10)
Data included when activated sludge was  passing  into effluent
Septic tank sludge not included in  influent BOD
Solids in quiescent  sections of ditch  have exceeded 20,000 mg/1
Data compliments of  College Utilities  Corporation
                                            38

-------
through July 1971 performance.  Murphy and Rangathan (10} indicated excessive
sludge deposition (SS<20,000 mg/1) in quiescent sections of the ditch.   A
sludge return pump was installed in June 1972.   One period of autoinduced
sludge wastage into the effluent was noticed between two August 1972 sample
dates, but effluent samples were apparently not collected during the sus-
pended solids loss.

The Glenwood, Minnesota oxidation  ditch (11) was studied in late January
1965.  At the time of the study, the ditch was  operating at ^40 hours de-
tention time with an actual loading of 1.0 Kg BOD/cu m/min (6 Ib BOD/1000
cu ft/day) 'or about half the design loading.  The settling tank overflow
rate was 15 lit/sq m/min (0.37 gal./sq ft/min), opposed to the design over-
flow rate of 23 lit/sq m/min (0.57 gal./sq ft/min).  During the winter sam-
pling period, the air temperature  ranged from -4°C (25°F) to -33°C (-27°F).
Mixed liquor temperature in the ditch ranged from 0.°C (32°F) to 2°C (36°F)
and averaged 1°C (34°F).  Raw sewage temperature ranged from 4°C to 10°C
(40° to 50°F).  The greatest ice formation occurred during windy weather
and covered approximately 75 percent of the ditch with 1.3 to 2 cm (1/2 to
3/4 in.) thick ice which gradually dissipated during calm weather.  BOD
removals averaged 92 percent over  a 4-day sampling period.
                                   39

-------
                               SECTION VI

                  MAJOR FACTORS AFFECTING PERFORMANCE
ORGANIC LOADING EFFECTS
Cold room bench scale data tends to shown that for low organic loads, 0.14
Kg BOD/Kg MLSS/Day or less, temperature has little effect as long as clari-
fier overflow rate is kept very low, less than 8 lit/sq m/min (0.2 gal./sq
ft/min.  At loadings less than 0.1, there were no sludge bulking problems.
Low temperature performance of the larger field units was much more sensi-
tive to loading.

All the Eielson Air Force Base 1971 and 1972 data, and the 1971  data for
the College oxidation ditch are summarized in Table 6--Subarctic Alaska
Extended Aeration Units.  Of all the parameters affecting low temperature
performance, organic loading is the most significant.

For this paper, organic loading (food to mass ratio) is defined as mass of
BOD input per day divided by mass of MLSS.  It can also be expressed as
Feed BOD (mg/l)/MLSS (mg/1)/detention (days).  Because the EAFB units had
oversized clarifiers in comparison to most extended aeration units, part
of the MLSS in the clarifiers was included in the organic loading calcula-
tion.  Suspended solids in the clarifier sludge blanket varied from 100 to
200 percent of the MLSS concentration; 125 percent was taken as the average
ratio.
The following formula was used to calculate the loading on a daily basis:

     Organic Load =  	mg/l_BQD input	
                    [MLSSAB+1.25MLSSAB(2.7-DS) Vc ] D.T."
                    [                   2.7    VAg]

Where:

     MLSS   = Aeration basin MLSS, mg/1

         DS = distance (meters), sludge blanket surface to water surface
              in clarifier.

              actual measurement in horizontal flow clarifier.

              unmeasurable  (under tubes) in upflow clarifier; there-
              fore, assumed to be 2.1 m.

              The clarifiers were effectively 2.7 m deep; therefore,
              the fraction  filled with sludge is  ,2.7-DS^
                                                  (  2-7 >

         Vc = volume of clarifier, cubic meters.


                                   40

-------
                                                   TABLE  6

                                   SUBARCTIC ALASKA EXTENDED  AERATION  UNITS
                                       AVERAGE PERFORMANCE  DATA
Period
I
II
III
I
II
III
1971
Location
EAFB
EAFB
EAFB
EAFB
EAFB
EAFB
Col lege
Oxidation
Ditch
Cl arifier
Flow
Pattern
Rect. Hz
Rect. Hz
Rect. Hz
Rect. Up
Rect. Up
Rect. Up
Circular
(4,5)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(1)
(2)
(3,6)
Up
Major
Liquid
Temp.
Range °C
7-17
2-9
1-8
7-19
2-7
1-8
8-20
% BOD
Removal
81
10
84
82
-30
76
84
Loadi ng
BOD/ MLSS
MLSS Day mg/1
0.10
0.14
0.03
0.12
0.11
0.04
0.05
2330
1710
3360
2370
2750
2740
3000
Percent
Volatile
82
84
78
80
83
79
60
Overflow
<•>
Liter/nr mm
(gal/ft2 day)
20
9.3
12
20
10
12
8.7
(710)
(330)
(420)
(710)
(370)
(420)
(310)
Effluent
SS mg/1
36
134
17
99
122
50
28
(1)  From October through December 1971,  period  I  average  feed  BOD  =  173 mg/1.

(2)  For February 1972, average period II feed BOD =  143 mg/1.

(3)  For March to May 1972, average period III feed BOD =  128 mg/1.

(4)  Ranganathan, K.  R.,  Murphy,  R.S., (TO)  Institute of Water  Resources, University of Alaska,  Report  #IWR-27,
     May 1972.  Septic tank sludge not included  in influent  BOD.  Solids in quiescent sections of ditch  have
     exceeded 20,000  mg/1.

(5)  Not including data when solids were  being wasted into effluent;  i.e., effluent BOD >influent BOD.

(6)  Rhodamine-B Dye  poisoning data excluded.

-------
          VB ~ v°lurne °f aeration basin, cubic meters.

         D.T. = detention time, days.

For each period, the loading could be converted to a volatile mass basis
by dividing the loading by the average volatile fraction of the MLSS; i.e.,
MLVSS/MLSS.

Organic loading is usually reported in terms of mixed  liquor volatile sus-
pended solids, MLVSS.  This was not done with the EAFB data since it was
desired to compare loadings from other reports (12)(13) in which volatile
fractions were not always reported.

In period I for both sides, the BOD removal  averaged 81 to 82 percent.  For
period II at the same feed rate, the performance dropped to less than 20
percent removal.  Aeration basin temperature was the only operational vari-
able that could effect the drastic reduction in performance.  Temperatures
averaged 12°C for period I and 4°C for period II.  Decreasing the average
clarifier overflow from 20 to about 9.9+0.6 lit/sq m/min (0.49 to 0.24
+0.01 gal./sq ft/min) did little to compensate for the temperature effects.
It was felt that the systems for period II had not yet reached equilibrium
but would continue to lose efficiency.  In period II solids passing through
the clarifier reduced the MLSS which increased the organic loading, thereby
forcing the process to self-destruction.

Period III data further illustrates that loading is the main temperature
sensitive variable.  During this period, performance recovery was excellent
even though it took 3 to 4 weeks to attain steady state.  The 3 to 5 week
equilibrium state is not enough time to make accurate predictions of long-
term performance.  The removal for the horizontal flow side averaged 84
percent at an average loading rate of 0.03,  even though the total overflow
was increased from period II to 12 lit/sq m/min (0.3 gal./sq ft/min).  The
up side did not perform as well at the same  temperatures and overflow rate
even though performance data were excluded when there were indications
that Rhodamine-B dye injections were poisoning the system.

It should be noted that the EAFB system was  operated using primary effluent
as feed.  If raw sewage was used as feed, it is estimated that the percent
BOD removal would be up to 5 percent higher  assuming the detention time
would be increased to keep the loading down.

For the EAFB units, the volatile fraction of the MLSS decreased, as expected,
with increased detention time.  The College  oxidation ditch, due to its low
bottom velocity, tends to accumulate partically digested activated sludge
as indicated by the low volatile fraction.  Information presented for
ditch removals exclude data when solids were being discharged into the
effluent.

Overall temperature effects of loading on performance for many other ex-
tended aeration units is shown in Figure 16.  Most of the warm 12-25°C
temperature data were extracted from the 1960 U.S.P.H.S. survey of several
extended aeration plants (12).  Some of the plotted data represents more
than five performance analyses and some represent only one or two.  The


                                    42

-------
               TEMPERATURE EFFECTS OF LOADING ON PERFORMANCE

                   EFFLUENT SS LIMITED TO LESS THAN 100 mg/1

          DATA FROM  EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE AND REFERENCES  (10 & 12)

                               LEGEND:
                                        D  1-7°C—AERL  & EAFB
                                        0  Period III Horizontal Side
                                        V  Period III Up Side
                                        O  7-12°C (10) & EAFB
                                        •  12-25°C (12)  &  EAFB
                                                                       i Q° r
                                                                        I -o L
   100 -r-
                          D
                          O
                          D
    90  4-'
              0

              0
    80
o

LlJ
Q
O
CD
O
C£
LU
Q_
     70  4-
    60  4-
    50 4-

                                           -0
                                   a
                                n
          Q
                                                                \
                                                                  \
                                                        n     n     \
                                                           a
    40
                   0.04
                               0.08
0.12
                           ORGANIC LOAD Kg BOD
                                        Kg MLSS DAY


                                 FIGURE 16

                                     43
0.16
0.20

-------
7-12°C data are from the College oxidation ditch (10),  AERL cold room reac-
tors, and the EAFB units.   The 1-7°C data were obtained from the cold room
reactors and the EAFB units.   Weekly average data from  EAFB were plotted
for period III.  For this  graph, all data with effluent suspended solids
greater than 100 mg/1 were excluded since it is felt that proper intentiona
wastage of excess activated sludge would limit effluent suspended solids to
less than 100 mg/1.   This  graph is then based only on expected performance
when intentional wastage separate from effluent is practiced.

Notice in Figure 16, as loading increases, BOD removal  drops off quite
rapidly at low temperatures (below 5 to 8°C).  For warmer temperatures
(above 12°C), loss of performance with load is moderate.

Wuhrman (14) also presented data which show that, as loading increases,
performance decreases; more so at temperatures less than 11°C than for
temperatures greater than  13°C.  His data are more in the activated sludge
range; i.e., loadings greater than 0.2.
SOLIDS LEVELS AND SEPARATION
In startup of an extended aeration plant,  performance is usually low until
enough biomass (MLSS) has been built up for adequate bioadsorption.   Gen-
erally speaking, a low MLSS concentration  also represents a high organic
loading which might tend to force the process to self-destruction were it
not for the clarifiers which,  at startup,  are underloaded in terms of
solids handling.  A typical curve of performance vs. the product of MLSS
and detention is shown in Figure 17.  The  upper curve is from the National
Sanitation Foundation observation of 10 package extended aeration units (13) ,
Summarized EAFB data is plotted on this graph.  The EAFB period I data would
not have appeared better than  the NSF package plant data if the abscissa was
in units of MLSS only.  The NSF data is for temperatures greater than 11 °C.
The comparative poor performance of period III data is attributed to the low
temperature and the fact that  the feed was primary effluent.

Extensive surface icing on an  aeration basin should be avoided because it
may rob the basin of its MLSS.  In discussing 1970 EAFB experience (Clark,
et_  al . (8) stated that the sludge accumulated in the growing ice, reducing
the suspended solids level in  the pond from approximately 2,500 mg/1 to
less than 200 mg/1 .

Solids removal plays a very important part in the efficiency of the acti-
vated sludge treatment process.  The degree of sludge separation directly
influences the quality of effluent from wastewater treatment plants with
higher concentrations of effluent solids contributing to higher effluent
BOD.
In activated sludge operation, solids separation is the most important
physical process contributing to overall  process performance.  Clarifier
performance can usually be met by design, whereas, performance of bio-
chemical -adsorption usually cannot.   Reed and Murphy (15) conducted an
                                      44

-------
O
O
CD
CJ

LlJ
Q_
                          PERFORMANCE VS. SOLIDS DETENTION

                   EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE EXTENDED AERATION UNITS

                               LEGEND:       SIDE     PERIOD  TEMPERATURE  °C
                                                    (    I
                                       A  Horizontal(   II
                                                    (  HI
                                                    (    I
                                               O  Up(   II
                                                    (  HI
                                                    O (III)
                                             NSF Package Plant
                                             Startup Data (T3)
                           1500                2500

                           MLSS x DETENTION (mg/1-days)
                                                                   7-17
                                                                   2-9
                                                                   1-8

                                                                   7-19
                                                                   2-7
                                                                   1-8
                   NSF Theoretical
                   Effluent
                   Mature Plant (13)
                                                                      (III)
                                                                   3500
                                 FIGURE 17

                                      45

-------
investigation of settling characteristics of activated sludge at temperatures
ranging from 1.1° to 23.4°C and found that the influence of temperature on
settling velocity decreased as the concentration increased.  They developed
an equation for zone settling based on experimental  data.  They also sug-
gested upflow sludge blanket clarifiers as having greater potential  for
cold regions application.  Benedict (16) suggested that effects of sludge
settleability on gross COD removal was magnified at low temperatures and
as loading rates were increased.

Solids separation is a function of both biological characteristics of the
sludge and physical  parameters of the settling unit.  Cold room experience
indicates that turbid effluent is not necessarily due to failure of the
sedimentation unit and may be eliminated by building up a well-acclimated
activated sludge population.  This will require operation at a relatively
low biological loading rate in order to obtain the degree of organic sta-
bilization necessary for low turbidity (17).  The cone reactor operating
at 1.3°C did produce a turbid effluent at loadings of around 0.2 Kg BOD/
Kg MLVSS/Day, but with a very low clarifier overflow rate  (Table 1).

Indications are that sludge bulking may be a problem in the activated sludge
process at the cold operating temperatures.  This problem was reported by
Ludzack (18).  Bulking sludges have not been reported in cold temperature
oxidation ditch studies  (1, 10, 11); however, these ditches were operated
at much longer detention times (1 to 2.3 days) which may be a factor.  Al-
though bulking sludges have not been a problem with the College oxidation
ditch, floating solids have.  Raganathan and Murphy (10) reported, "In
the late summer, the whole ditch became covered with a mat of floating
solids, which were thought to have originated from the anaerobic activity,
raising the sludge deposit from the bottom of the tank."

The circular upflow clarifier for this oxidation ditch was evaluated in
terms of solids flux; Ibs dry solids in clarifier feed per day per sq ft
of clarifier separation area (10).  Solids flux may be controlling in
clarifier design for high MLSS values and low SVI's.  The oxidation ditch
MLSS usually had low SVI—less than 100 most of the time.

Hansen and Culp (19) reported on experiments with a method of solids separa-
tion which successfully employed shallow depth sedimentation theory.  The
settling unit consisted of small diameter tubes (2.5 cm) inclined at 5° and
0.6-1.2 meters in length.  Detention times were very low; however, back-
washing was necessary for removal of accumulated solids.  Hansen, et^  a1.
(20), also reported on the use of steeply inclined tubes (60°) which permit
solids depositing in the tubes to continuously slide down by gravity.  Plant
scale applications of the steeply-inclined settling tube concept have been
reported by Conley and Slechta (4).  They concluded that for primary clari-
fication, complete removal of settleable solids and 40-60 percent of sus-
pended solids can be achieved with 0.6-m (2-ft) long settling tubes 5 cm
(2 in.) in depth at an overflow rate of 122 lit/sq m/min (3 gal./sq ft/min).
They indicated that until methods are developed to continually control the
biological process, tube settlers in the activated sludge process should
be considered as a device for improving effluent quality during upsets in
the biological process or peak flows.  Flow rates should not exceed 41
lit/sq m/min  (1.0 gal./sq ft/min), which should provide effluent with 20-40
                                   46

-------
mg/1 suspended solids under present biological conditions and 5-20 mg/1
under normal conditions.  They stated that material will collect on top of
the tubes and that routine cleaning is required to maintain effluent qual-
ity.  Pohl  (21) investigated tube settlers in the laboratory and found his
best results at room temperature; however, he felt the tubes occasionally
passed excessive colloidal solids.

Tube settlers were evaluated as a possible alternate means of providing
solids separation and return.  Initial data were obtained from the 33.7-
liter reactor with 5 cm x 5 cm (2 x 2 in.) settling tubes.  These results
are summarized in Table 7 and are based on continuous flow without an on-
off or backwash cycle.  A plot of effluent suspended solids vs. overflow
rates is  shown in Figure 18.

Effluent  overflow rates were varied by utilizing two pumps, one to provide
recycle and one for effluent, as shown in Figure 5.  A desired overflow
rate  (less  than the feed rate) was set with the effluent pump on one of
the tubes while the remaining feed was forced to flow through the second
tube to the overflow line.  The desired flow rate through the second tube
could then  be obtained  by utilizing a recycle pump.

During operation, sludge rose in the tubes until it reached a level at
which it  was in equilibrium with the effluent flow.  Action in the tube
consisted of a rolling motion in which solids were being carried up along
the top side of the tube in a mass with the effluent, as shown in Figure
19.  The  mass gradually settled toward the bottom side of the tube where
it entered  a current moving downward caused by the weight of the solids.
During normal operation, solids in the tube are constantly being replaced
at a relatively high rate (<3 hrs).  This fact was confirmed by placing
Rhodamine-B dye in one of the 33.7-liter  reactor tubes while the sludge
was at a  high level of approximately 1.3  m (50 in.) and timing the rate of
descent along the bottom of the tube.  Figure 20 shows a plot of sludge
level in  the 5 cm x 5 cm (2 x 2 in.) tubes at various continuous overflow
rates.

As an illustration of the tendency of the sludge to reach a certain level
in the tubes in equilibrium with the effluent flow, a plot of sludge rate
of ascent vs. sludge height at a given overflow rate is presented in Figure
21.  This curve was obtained by shutting  off the effluent flow until the
sludge settled to a low height in the tube.  The overflow rate was then
set and the sludge height recorded at specific time intervals.  As can be
seen, the rate of sludge rise markedly decreases as the sludge height in-
creases.

During this period of operation, the SVI's of the mixed liquor ranged
around 230 without hindering operation of the reactor.  During the pre-
viously described erratic cold room operation, while trying to reach an
8°C reactor temperature, the mixed liquor SVI increased to around 260 and
the sludge  took on a fluffy snowflake appearance.  The rolling action of
the sludge  in the tubes stopped and the sludge height began to rise, even-
tually spilling out with the effluent.  Cutting the effluent flow rates
back to less than 8 lit/sq m/min (0.2 gal./sq ft/min) resulted in lowering
the DO in the effluent tubes to zero, further complicating the problem.


                                   47

-------
                                                           TABLE 7

                                               33.7-LITER  (8.9-Gallon) REACTOR
                                           RESULTS OF OPERATION WITH VARYING EFFLUENT
                                             OVERFLOW RATES ON THE SETTLING TUBES


1
Reactor1
Temp.°C
0.35
(.3-. 5)
0.7
(.4-. 9)

4.2
(2.8-6.4)

3.8
(3.5-4.1)

INFLUENT

Susp.
Solids
(mg/D
95

112


94


77




BOD COD
(mg/1) (mg/1)
244 292

253 370


193 229


142 283


REACTOR

Susp.
Solids
(mg/1) SVI
3973 238

4237 238


4147


4067 229


EFFLUENT
Overflow
Rate
liter/min-nr
(gpm/ft2)
16 (.4)

12 (.3)

24 (.6)
12 (.3)

24 (.6)
20 (.5)

33 (.8)


Solids
(mg/1)
10

8

20
10

14
10

13


BOD
(mg/1)
12

22

29
17

20
14

20


% BOD
Removal
95

91

89
91

90
90

86


COD
(mg/1)
69

71

87
60

70
62

69


% COD
Removal
76

79

77
74

69
78

76
co
      (1) Values in parentheses are minimum and maximum for that period.

-------
20
15--
                                A
                                          A
Legend
00
-o
QJ
T3
c 10 •
O) u
CL
00
=3
OO
4->
C
Ol
13
t 5 '
UJ

0
^
A O A
0
V
0
(gpm/ft2)
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
1 i 1,1
1 1 1
10 20 30
Continuous Flow
O <1°C
A '^4°C
Intermittent Flow
on 1/2 hr
off 1/2 hr
D^3°C
V'^4°C
Intermittent Flow
on 2 hr
off 1 hr
0 '^8°C
MLSS ^ 4000 mg/1


            Overflow Rates Liters/min
                      FIGURE 18

         33.7-LITER AND 47.1-LITER REACTORS
             EFFLUENT SUSPENDED SOLIDS
                        VS.
       OVERFLOW RATES AT VARIOUS TEMPERATURES
                      49

-------
        Begi nni ng
    of  clear  effluent
       and  sludge
       interface
                                                              Clear
                                                              Effluent
                                                           Particles
                                                          rising above
                                                         sludge blanket
                                                      Sludge circulation
                                                            pattern
FIGURE 19.   SLUDGE ACTION I;J SETTLING TUBES
                             50

-------
   TOO -
OJ
(J
    50
          40
             oo
             LU
             nz
             O
          30
                     O
                                  Manufactured


                                   Tube Length
20
          10
              O

              A
               0.3

               I
                    (gpm/ft
                   0.5
 Legend:  © <"1°c


 MLSS:   a,4000 mg/1


       0.7

	L
           10                20



                  Overflow Rates  Lit/sq m/min


                           FIGURE  20
                                     T~

                                     30
                       33.7-LITER REACTOR
                SLUDGE  HEIGHTS  IN EFFLUENT TUBES
                              VS.
   EFFLUENT  OVERFLOW  RATES  WITH CONTINUOUS FLOW THROUGH TUBES
                          51

-------
  s_
  QJ
  QJ
  OJ
  u
  QJ
  4->
  03
  OJ
  l/l
  CU
  en
  T3
     0.75  .
     0.50
     0.25  ..
              :o.3;
       00
       QJ
(0.2!
                 20
     Mi:S:  5000 mg/1

         Overf1ow

Rate:  3.3 Liter   (0.8  gpm/ft

           min m

       Mixed Liquor

        Temp:  <1°C
                                                             2^
                 0.5          0.75         1.0

                  Sludge Ht in Tubes (meters)
FIGURE 21.   RATE OF SLUDGE RISE  IN  TUBES  VS.  SLUDGE HEIGHT
                         52

-------
At a later date, the 47.1-liter reactor was placed in operation.  This
reactor was constructed with two tube sides, one 10 cm deep by 8.9 cm
wide, and two 5 cm deep by 8.9 cm wide, as shown in Figure 5.  This reac-
tor also had a channel running down behind the tubes to permit circulation
of mixed liquor under the tubes for removal of settled sludge.

This reactor was operated for a period of time with a very low continuous
overflow rate and then increased to an average rate of 20 lit/sq m/min
(0.5 gal./sq ft/min) with an alternate on-off cycle.  In other words, with
overflow for 1/2 hour and no overflow for 1/2 hour as a cycle, the actual
flow then was 40 lit/sq m/min (1 gal./sq ft/min) for 1/2 hour.

A summary of results for this reactor is shown in Table 8 and the corres-
ponding maximum and minimum sludge heights in the tubes presented in Table
9.  As indicated, the SVI's again ranged above 200 with very consistent
solids removals.  Effluent solids concentrations are very low for the whole
range of studies.  The longer on-times for the on-off cycle (2-1/2 hours as
opposed to 1/2 hour) did indicate that longer cycles may result in higher
effluent solids concentration.  The data were inconclusive, however, because
of the few sets of data and the fact that the change in temperature may have
been a contributing factor in the higher effluent solids at 7.8°C.

Neither the 5 cm x 8.9 cm tubes or the 10 cm x 8.9 cm tube appeared to have
an advantage as far as solids removal are concerned.  There was a significant
difference between the maximum sludge heights reached within the tubes, how-
ever, which is a very important consideration.  Lengths of the tubes will
be limited in actual application because of space requirements and economic
reasons.

As indicated in Table 9, the maximum sludge heights reached in the smaller
cross-section tubes were considerably less than those reached in the lar-
ger tube.  This may be attributed to the fact that the two smaller tubes
provided twice the surface area at the top side of the tubes which signifi-
cantly reduced the effluent flow along these surfaces.  Consequently, the
upward force on the sludge in the tubes was reduced resulting in lower sludge
heights.

An observation of sludge heights in the tubes during backwash operations
was also recorded.  Introduction of the backwash cycle did significantly
reduce the maximum sludge heights by forcing the sludge blanket back down
the tubes.  Backwashing provides a definite advantage in that it prevents
a bulky sludge from becoming stagnant in the tubes as occurred when the
33.7-liter reactor operation failed at 8°C.  Cold room experience indica-
ted that clarifier backwashing in conjunction with low overflow rates was
successful in overcoming problems associated with bulking sludge.

Organic loading rates also affected sludge settleability as shown in Fig-
ure 22, which is a graph of settling rate--0 to 5 min rate in a 2-liter
settlometer vs. MLSS for different detention times and temperatures for
the horizontal side, EAFB pilot units.  Generally, the settling velocity
decreased with decreasing temperature and increasing MLSS concentration.
The data should be interpreted with caution for they do not suggest that
one would not be able to hold a MLSS concentration greater than 3000 mg/1
at an overflow greater than 12 lit/sq m/min (0.30 gal./sq ft/min).


                                    53

-------
                                                     TABLE 8

                                       47.1-LITER (12.5-GALLON)  REACTOR
                             RESULTS OF OPERATION WITH VARYING EFFLUENT OVERFLOW
                                         RATES ON THE SETTLING TUBES
INFLUENT

( 1 }
Reactor '
Temp. °C
2.4
(1.4-3.5

2.9


4.4


7.8




Solids BOD
(mg/1) (mg/1)
77 177


86 185


93 223


87 194




COD
(mg/1)
303


275


321


313


REACTOR


Susp.
Solids
3957


4157


4095


4504


(2)
Overflow
Rate
(gpm/ft2)
SVI liter/m^min
--- 8 (0.2)
(continuous)

214 12 (0.3)
(on 1/2 hr-
off 1/2 hr)
235 20 (0.5)
(on 1/2 hr-
off 1/2 hr)
209 20 (0.5)
(on 2 hr-
off 1 hr)


Tube
Size
2 x 3.5

4 x 3.5
2 x 3.5

4 x 3.5
2 x 3.5

4 x 3.5
2 x 3.5

4 x 3.5
EFFLUENT


Solids
(mg/D
2

2
4

3
4

5
12

14


BOD
(mg/1)
19

19
12

10
12

12
20

23


% BOD
Removed
89

89
94

95
95

95
90

88


COD
(mg/1)
35

39
50

52
55

69
69

64


% COD
Removed
88

87
82

81
83

79
78

80
(1)   Values  in parentheses are minimum and maximum for that period.
(2)   Notes in parentheses indicate the time cycle of effluent flow through the tubes.

-------
                    TABLE 9
                47.1-LITER REACTOR
             SLUDGE LEVELS IN TUBES AT
         VARIOUS EFFLUENT OVERFLOW RATES
Overflow Rate
Liter
m^ min
(gpm/ft2)
1.2 (.3)
[on 1/2 hr
off 1/2 hr]
2.0 (.5)
[on 1/2 hr
off 1/2 hr]
2.0 (.5)
[on 2-1/2 hr
off 1/2 with
backwash]



Temp (°C)


4


4



8
Reactor
Susp.
Solids
(mg/1)


4407


4253



4023



SVI


185


223



232
10 x 8.9 cm Tube^2)
Sludge Hts cm (in. )

High


86 (34)


119 (47)



58 (23)

Low


58 (23)


58 (23)



0
5 x 8.9 cm Tubes(2)
Sludge Hts cm (in. )

High


61 (24)


76 (30)



38 (15)

Low


28 (11)


20 (8)



0
[1]  Notes in brackets indicate the type cycle
     of effluent flow through the tubes

(2)  High and low points represent the maximum heights
     which the sludge reached in the tubes  during
     effluent flow and the minimum levels reached
     during the off cycle or backwash cycle
                      55

-------
                   2-LITER SETTLOMETER TEST, 0-5 MINUTE RATE

              EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE  PILOT EXTENDED AERATION PLANT


                               Horizontal Side
    2.0
                                    LEGEND:
                                               TEMP. °C   DETENTION DAYS
                                  0  7-17
                                 O  2-9
                                 D  1-8
                                      0.6
                                      0.5
                                      1.0
o
 i
 i
           0.4
              CL
              CD
     .0 -
           0.2
                             n
                                                   D
                                          D
           O

         DO
    0.0
        1000
       oo
    o o
O   O
-0-
                o o
         oo        o
                —I	v	
                2000                  3000

           MIXED LIQUOR SUSPENDED SOLIDS (mg/1


                  FIGURE  12

                       56
  o      n   o n
DI  DDPDE   DI
                                                                     4000

-------
The residence time in clarifiers is much greater than 5 minutes and the
clarifier geometry usually favors better solids separation.  For normal
sludges, the 0 to 5 minute rate was the highest settling rate.  The 0 to
5 minute rate was not always the highest settling rate for bulking sludges.

Downing (22) (Figure 23) shows that settleability is improved by longer
detention times (10 hours) and very short detention times  (4 hours) when
operating an activated sludge plant at warm temperatures.  The EAFB hori-
zontal side data shows somewhat better settleability than Downing indicated,
but his data may be based on much higher MLSS data.  He did not specify
temperatures.  The EAFB low temperature long detention data (period III)
brackets his general curve.

A solids flux analysis was not performed for the EAFB units because it was
felt that solids flux has little meaning when SVI's are above 100.  The two
EAFB clarifiers were operated at similar total overflows for direct compari-
son.  Table 10 is a listing of total overflow and effluent SS for the two
types of clarifiers operated at the same temperature and same sludge settling
(0 to 5 min) rate, cm/min.  The table should be considered only as showing a
trend even though each value listed is an arithmetic average of from 2 to 9
daily points.  For the 1/2-day detention periods, the upflow clarifier was
operating at an overflow rate 13 percent above the horizontal  flow clarifier.
But the up side effluent averaged only 6 percent richer in suspended solids.
The horizontal clarifier performance appears superior, 28 percent less SS,
for the 1-day detention period when the mixed liquor temperatures were 6°
and 2°C, while the up side was at 3°C.  The above data isn't consistent
enough to show any strong trend, but it could be interpreted to mean that
the up flow with tubes clarifier has no advantage over conventional clari-
fiers at low temperatures.  To hold reasonable effluent SS levels using
the data presented in Figure 18 through 22 and Tables 6 through 10, it
appears that the maximum low temperature (
-------
               VOLUME PERCENT OF ACTIVATED SLUDGE VS. DETENTION TIME


                  EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE EXTENDED AERATION PLANT



                    HORIZONTAL FLOW SIDE - 2 LITER SETTLOMETER



                                 LEGEND:  TEMPERATURE °C     DETENTION  DAYS
                                            0  7-17
                                            O  2-9
                                            D  1-8
            0.6
            0.5
            1.0
   100-P.
    754-
o
1C

(XI
    50
o
CC
UJ
D_
o
    25
                  DOUNING  (22)
8
0 * ot °
	 1 	 1 	 1 	 1-
D
D
§
0 g 0
                              10
20
                               DETENTION TIME HOURS

                                    FIGURE 23
                                       58

-------
COMPARISON OF UP SIDE WITH TUBE AND



    HORIZONTAL FLOW CLARIFIERS
MLSS
Temp.
°C
1/2 Day
13
13
11
3
6 & 5
1 Day
6 & 3
2 & 3
Settlometer
Rate Both
Sides cm/mi n
Detention
0.2
0.3
1.3
0.2
0.3
Detention
0.2
1.1
HORIZONTAL
Total
Overflow
1 i ter/min rrr
16
19
21
8.5
9.3
12
12
FLOW
EFF. SS
mg/1
43
94
18
282
53
26
17
UPSIDE
EFF- SS
mg/1 li
51
169
40
111
151
27
33
Total
Overflow
ter/min nr
18
23
22
11
9.3
12
12
                59

-------
Cell yield (c) increases with increasing temperature because it is believed
a larger portion of BOD removal  is utilized for energy at low temperatures
than at high temperatures (26).   The rate of endogenous respiration is de-
pressed at low temperatures (more so than cell  yield); therefore, the quantity
of excess sludge produced is increased.  Benedict (16) reports values for c
and k (endogenous rate) at 4°C of 0.42 mg/mg COD and 0.0132/day respectively.

In discussing small extended aeration treatment plants, an Alaskan Depart-
ment of Health and Welfare report (27) indicates that, since the effluent
will usually be discharged into a small stream, it must be well treated.
The report also states that, in most cases, to produce a good effluent,
sludge wasting must be practiced.

Morris (28) studied the effects of effluent discharges to streams by two
extended aeration plants having no provision for intentional sludge wasting,
and stated that plant efficiency is directly related to the amount of solids
lost in the effluent.  He indicated sludge discharges occur similar to those
described by Grube and Murphy (1) with solids depositing on the stream bed,
creating nuisance potential.

Statements such as the above should be considered along with the fact that
excess solids production increases with decreasing treatment plant tem-
peratures.  In view of this observation, sludge wasting and disposal in
cold climates must be given special consideration.  Based on cold room data,
Tables 3 and 4, it would appear that provision should be made for wasting
0.5 Kg solids per Kg of BOD removed at colder operating temperatures (<5°C)
and at organic loadings of 0.1 Kg influent BOD/Day/Kg MLVSS.

Different results were obtained at EAFB extended aeration units where the
solids accumulation is defined as:

     Solids accumulation (SA) = AMLSS + Solids Lost (EFFLUENT + WASTAGE)

Solids accumulation is calculated as a ratio of SS to input BOD.  The following
formula is used to calculate the solidsj accumulation from a computer printout
of data from the EAFB pilot plant:

     SA = (AMLSS)  (DETENTION TIME)  + TOTAL SS LOST
          (Avg Feed Bod) (Data Per-    Avg Feed BOD
                         iod)(Days)

     Where:  AMLSS = MLSS at end of data period - MLSS at start of
             data period.

The EAFB data points for the six periods are plotted in Figure 24, Solids
Accumulations, along with the NSF package plant data (13).  Some of the
EAFB data indicates that excess solids were accumulating at rates greater
than 0.6 Kg SS/Kg BOD applied.  Excess solids are suspended solids above
those required to maintain a constant MLSS level.  Under normal operations,
some SS is wasted into the effluent.  Assuming an SA of 0.6, applied (feed)
BOD equal to 200 mg/1 and an effluent SS of 20  mg/1, then the separate
(exclusive of effluent) wastage requirement would be reduced by 0.1 Kg SS/
Kg BOD; yielding 0.5 Kg SS/Kg BOD to be wasted.  The 0.5 figure then seems
                                    60

-------
                     SOLIDS ACCUMULATION

         EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE EXTENDED AERATION UNITS

                    Kg MLSS/Kg BOD APPLIED
     .0  ~r
    0.8  —
Q
O
CQ
    0.6
o
i—i
<=C
o
CJ
    0.4  —
    0.2
   0.0
                                               PERIOD)
                                                  I
                               A  Horizontal (   II
                                              (  HI
TEMP.
 °C
7-17
2-9
                                         DETENTION
                                           DAYS
                                            0.6
                                            0.5
                                            1.0
                A (II)
o (in
               O(ni)
                        (    I
                        (   II
                        (  III
                                                        7-19
                                                        2-7
                                                        1-8
          0.6
          0.4
          1.0
                                                   A  (III)
                           NSF  Package Plant Data  (13)
                           Mature  MLSS
                                   Kg SS
                                   Kg BOD
                   1000        2000        3000

                   MLSS x DETENTION (mg/1-days)

                           FIGURE 24
                                 4000
                                   61

-------
adequate for low temperatures at low organic loadings £0.08 Kg BOD/Kg MLSS/
Day.  High loadings at low temperatures is of course impracticable as shown
earlier.  The EAFB influent SS to BOD ratio varied from 0.6 to 0.9.  If one
is designing for a higher feed ratio, then the wastage facility capacity
might have to be increased.

Under normal conditions without intentional wastage, the MLSS will build
up to a certain high level (limited by settling characteristics and system
operation), then considerable SS will pass into the effluent in a short time,
reducing the MLSS to a more optimum level.  This self-wastage has been called
"autoinduced wastage" (9).  Between the wastage periods, the effluent SS has
always been less than 100 mg/1 for extended aeration units in stable equili-
brium.  Intentional wastage should also always keep the effluent SS less than
100 mg/1.

At EAFB, intentional wastage was practiced only in period I.  In period II
both sides were losing MLSS.  During period III, it was attempted to find
the maximum MLSS the system would hold before autoinduced wastage occurred.
The horizontal side reached ^4100 mg/1 and the up side ^3300 mg/1 before
autoinduced wastage was triggered at the low mixed liquor temperatures.

Separate intentional wastage has not been practiced at the College oxida-
tion ditch which caused some of the poor 1971 performance (Table 5).  The
1972 performance appears much better, because autoinduced wastage periods
and recovery probably occurred between the every-other-week sampling periods.
Observation of the ditch effluent between some of the September and October
sampling periods showed it to be very rich in SS.  The MLSS concentration,
as sampled, was observed to slowly drop from 5820 mg/1 on August 2, 1972,
to 2570 mg/1 on October 25, 1972.

The above discussion points out the necessity of obtaining 24-hour flow
proportioned composite samples for characterizing any short detention
(less than 10 days) biological waste treating system.  In the opinion of
the author, separate intentional wastage would prevent sludge banks from
forming downstream of any secondary sewage treatment plant.

When separate wastage is practiced, disposing of the wasted sludge then
becomes a problem.  .Sludge digestion and disposal methods present a problem
at colder temperatures due to added heat requirements and poor drainability.
Ludzack (18) indicates that sludge development at cold temperatures may re-
quire digestion at higher temperatures before disposal.  Thomas  (26) indi-
cates the freeze-thaw cycle may be taken advantage of in cold climates to
increase drainability.  Clark, et  al_. (8), have shown that sludge can
be concentrated in ice forming on an exposed aeration (digestion) basin.
The Sewage 'Commission of the City of Milwaukee (29) reports that freezing
is an excellent method of activated sludge conditioning.  But they also
reported that capital and operating costs  (refrigeration) were appreciably
higher  for.the freeze method than for the chemical method.  In the lower
49 states, freezing sludge is expensive, but in cold climates, it does not
require refrigeration facilities.  Space to store wasted sludge during
the short summers is not usually expensive unless land values are high.
                                   62

-------
DISSOLVED OXYGEN LEVELS


The major winter difference between the oxidation ditch and the EAFB units
was in the activated sludge characteristics.  The oxidation ditch MLSS
reached ^5800 mg/1  with SVI less than 100, while the EAFB units limited
themselves to about 4100 mg/1 with SVI's usually greater than 100.  A major
cause for this difference may have been the mixed liquor DO levels.  The
oxidation ditch subsurface DO was usually less than 1 mg/1, while the DO
of the EAFB pilot units was usually greater than 1.5 mg/1 with no gradient
due to depth.  At EAFB, lower DO activated sludges appeared to settle fas-
ter.  Murphy (10) indicated that the cage rotors at the College utilities
oxidation ditch were not capable of transferring sufficient oxygen under
prevailing conditions.

For extended aeration, the oxygen requirements are much higher than for
conventional activated sludge due to the endogenous respiration and nitri-
fication requirements.  For temperate climates, air requirement values of
100-130 cubic meters/Kg BOD  (1500-2000 SCF/lb BOD) have been quoted (30,
31).  Oxygen requirement is lower for low temperature operation because of
less nitrification and a lower wet oxidation (endogenous respiration) rate.

The following equation has been used to define the temperature effect of
oxygen transfer rates:

     K1 = K29^T1 " V

     where:

     K- = rate at T-,

     9 = temperature coefficient

Eckenfelder and O'Connor (32) state that the temperature coefficient 9,
when applied to oxygen transfer efficiencies, has been reported to vary
from 1.016 to 1.047 and that studies on bubble aeration indicate a tempera-
ture coefficient of 1.02 applies.  Effects of temperature on stream reaera-
tion have been studied under controlled experiments in the laboratory and
a 9 value of 1.0241 found for the temperature range of 5 to 30°C (33).

Terashima, et  a 1. (34), indicated the mass of oxygen transferred is more
affected by increasing the saturated dissolved oxygen concentration than
by decreasing the overall oxygen transfer coefficient and concluded low
water temperatures are not detrimental to oxygen transfer.  In other words,
the increase in driving force (higher saturation) at lower temperatures
more than compensates for the increase in diffusion resistance.  They
found 9 equal to 1.017 in the temperature range of 5-25°C.

For oxygen transfer, the minimum air rate (to maintain 1/2 mg/1 DO) into
5°C, 2000 mg/1 MLSS was found to be 63 cubic meters/Kg BOD (1000 SCF/lb
BOD) at the EAFB units.  The transfer efficiency (including surface effects)
with the open-type aerators  (monospargers and shearboxes, both underloaded)
was approximately 4 percent at 3.4 m  (11 ft) depth and 1/2 mg/1 DO.

                                   63

-------
UPSETS
The EAFB extended aeration units were relatively insensitive to starvation
or temporary lack of oxygen.   As noted on Figures 12 and 13, the feed was
off for as long as 3 consecutive days in October with very little effect
upon performance.  A white surface foam formed on the aeration basin indi-
cating the starvation condition.  Due to temporary unbalance in the aeration
system, the air to one side or the other was off for many hours (overnight
in a few cases) with no noticable effect upon performance.

The effect of Rhodamine-B dye poisoning is noted on Figure 12 for period
III.  Dye strength was estimated to be from 2 to 7 mg/1  in the aeration ba-
sins.  The high concentration was used to qualitatively define the basin's
flow patterns without the use of a fluorometer.  The dye-induced wastage
did not occur until 4 to 6 days after injection into the low temperature
mixed liquor.  Apparently, the inhibitory effects took 3 to 5 days to develop,
                                  64

-------
                              SECTION VII

                  MINOR FACTORS AFFECTING PERFORMANCE
MIXING
Results from the qualitative dye study at EAFB indicated that there was com-
plete mixing in the aeration basin but that the minimum system flow-through
time was very short.  For instance, the horizontal side, Rhodamine-B dye
(^1 liter 40% solution) was injected into the feed and in less than 5 min-
utes, the aeration basin was completely colored.  A colored upwelling under
the clarifier effluent trough was noted at 35 minutes.  The liquid 1 meter
down in the center of the horizontal flow clarifier had not developed any
color by the time the dye was beginning to pass out with the effluent at
about 45 minutes.  This indicates that it would be most wise to locate
the effluent weir away from any wall or baffle when density currents could
cause upwelling.  Mixing time to color the up side aeration basin was also
less than 5 minutes, but the dye appeared above the tubes (settler) in 25
minutes and was passing into the effluent at 1/2 hour.

The velocity profile for the EAFB extended aeration basins was determined
using a vertical vane, magnetic head, velocity meter.  This instrument in-
dicated only the horizontal component of the velocity.  Surface velocities
were measured by timing a floating wood block.  The velocities at various
depths are listed in Table 11.

All velocities except those near the surface were consistently less than
the generally recommended 0.3 meters (1 ft) per second but there was no
excessive sludge accumulation in the bottom of either basin.  It should be
remembered, however, that both units were fed with primary effluent.  Opera-
tion with air inputs as low as 5 cmm/106 liters (0.7 SCFM/1000 gal.) had
caused some MLSS to settle in the aeration basin.

For weaker sewage, mixing may require more air than does oxygen transfer.
For adequate mixing in vertical wall tanks with 3.4 m (11 ft) aerator
submergence, the air requirement is 7 to 14 cmm/106 liters (1 to 2.0
SCFM/1000 gal.).

Grube (9) reported surface velocities on the College Utilities oxidation
ditch to be about 0.3 m per second.  Murphy (10) later reported excessive
sludge deposition and said, "...it thus appears that the rectangular con-
figuration and the aerators used in this plant are unsuitable for keeping
the floe in suspension."


BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS


Poor settling sludges were developed during the operation of the cold room
bench scale reactors with the Sludge Volume Index (SVI) consistently ran-
ging above 200.  The sludge produced appeared to be of a zoogeal type


                                    65

-------
    Table 11.  EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE EXTENDED AERATION BASINS
                  HORIZONTAL VELOCITY COMPONENTS

              Velocities in Meters/second (ft/second)
                    Location in Aeration Basins

Depth

m (ft)
Surface
0.3
1.0
1.5
2.1
2.7
3.4
Liquid
( D
( 3)
( 5)
( 7)
( 9)
(11)
Depth
Horizontal Flow


0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
--


15
06
09
06
03
06
--
C D

(0.5)
(0.2)
(0.3)
(0.2)
(0.1)
(0.2)
—
0.37 (
0.30 (
0.09 (
0.06 (
0.09 (
0.06 (
0.06 (
3.7 (

1-2)
1.0)
0.3)
0.2)
0.3)
0.2)
0.2)
12ft)


0.30
0.27
0.18
0.03
0.06
0.09
0.12
3.7

A
( 1.
( o.
( o.
( o.
( o.
( o.
( o.
Up Flow

0)
9)
6)
D
2)
3)
4)
(12ft)
_ _» — —
0.12
0.12
0.09
0.09
0.12
0.18
	

B
...
(0.4)
(0.4)'
(0.3)
(0.3)
(0.4)
(0.6)
—
    Air lifts off;  using  3.4  cubic  meter/min  (cmm)  compressor;
                  bleeding  approximately  1.4  cmm
 2.3m (7 1/2'^
0.9m       ~~*
2.3m (7
                                                       0.9m
        Aerators

Flow
s 	


MM




"V




v -
X\f .
• *%•*-
A B
Up Flow
1 Aerators






••»
/





*•*•




v '
o
ro

j
                              Plan
                  Front 2/3 of Aeration Basins
                              66

-------
similar to that reported by Heukelekian and Wiesburg (35) who found a direct
correlation between increasing SVI and increasing bound water for this type
of bulking.  Very little evidence of Sphaej-Qtilus was noted during microscopic
examination.   Ludzack (18) also reported a poor settling sludge at low tem-
peratures (5°C) with very poor drainability.

Because of the differences noted in operation of the cone reactors at 1.3°C
and 6.5°C, it was decided to raise the 33.7-liter reactor temperature gra-
dually, first to 4°C and then to 8°C, letting the reactor stabilize at each
temperature.   This was done in an attempt to determine the changing sludge
characteristics with temperature changes from 4° to 8°C.

Reactor temperature was first raised to 4°C from less than 1°C over a period
of 2 days with no noticeable effects.  After stabilizing at 4°C, reactor
temperature was again raised.  However, at the same time, the coils of the
cold room refrigeration unit began to freeze due to excessive mositure con-
densation and the cold room operation became very erratic.  Reactor tempera-
ture went from 4°C to 10°C, back to 6.5°C, and finally stabilized at around
8°C within about 5 days.  The SVI jumped from around 230 to 260 with the
sludge changing from a granular matrix to a fluffy, snowflake appearance.
The reactor began to pass heavy solids concentrations in the effluent 3
days after the erratic cold room operation began.  Noticeable microscopic
changes during this period were an obvious reduction in quantity and activity
of protozoa.

Reactor operation was maintained at 8°C for approximately 10 days during which
time it did not return to its normal state.  It was subsequently returned to
the colder operating temperatures and the feed cut off for 12 days in an at-
tempt to improve the settling qualities of the sludge.  The SVI's returned
to around 230 but few other changes took place with negligible decrease in
suspended solids or percent volatile suspended solids.  The quantity and
activity of protozoa did begin returning to their former state at about the
time the reactor temperature was returned to the lower level.

The significance of protozoa in an efficiently operating activated sludge
process, as reported by McKinney (17), was observed during operation of
the reactors even at the coldest temperatures.  The 47.1-liter reactor
was started at temperatures <2°C with return sludge seed from an oxidation
ditch treating domestic sewage.  Initially, the effluent was very turbid
as the sludge was acclimating itself to the new conditions.  The decreasing
turbidity of the sludge as acclimation progressed corresponded to increasing
numbers of protozoa, generally Paramecium and Vort_i^eT[a_.  As reported by
McKinney, a very well stabilized activated sludge system will have few
stalked ciliates and no other protozoa because of relatively few bacteria;
whereas, a somewhat less stabilized system will have greater numbers of free
swimming ciliates because of greater numbers of free swimming bacteria.  He
states that the presence of stalked ciliates indicated an activated sludge
system with a low BOD effluent.  Vorticella was present in both reactors
after initial startup except for one period in the 47.1-liter reactor as
described below.

After stable operations at temperatures of <2°C and %4°C, the 47.1-liter
reactor temperature was increased to 8°C over a period of 6 days.  Effluent
                                    67

-------
suspended solids increased from approximately 5 mg/1  before the temperature
change to approximately 18 mg/1 during the change and to a maximum of 46
mg/1 3 days after reaching 8°C.  During this period,  the effluent became
very turbid with very few solids settling out in the  effluent tank.  Pro-
tozoa became very reduced in numbers and very inactive.  Again, the return
to normal operation corresponded to an increase in the number of Vorticella
and Paramecium present in the sludge.  Coliform removals also directly cor-
respond to the numbers of protozoa present, dropping  from 99.8 percent re-
movals before the upset to less than 80 percent during the period of reduced
protozoa.

Aside from temperature change, the only other parameter measured, which
could explati the sudden change in reactor performance, was an increase in
dissolved solids for over a one day period.  Dissolved solids ranged from
250 to 360 mg/1 prior to the sharp increase to 450 for one day and a sub-
sequent decrease to ^360 mg/1.  This could be evidence of toxic material
in the feed.  Ten days after returning to stable operation at 8°C, the
sludge was exhibiting the same characteristics as with the 33.7-liter reac-
tor.  That is, the SVI's were ranging around 250 and the floe exhibited a
fluffy snowflake appearance.  Reactor operation was not impaired under these
conditions because of the backwash cycle added to the settling apparatus.


EQUIPMENT HOUSING AND PROCESS EXPOSURE


At EAFB the unheated A-frame clarifier provided sufficient protection even
though it was not totally sealed at the clarifier surface or around a poly-
ethylene film curtain door.  During low liquid temperature operation, thin
ice formed on the surfaces of the clarifiers but did not affect the opera-
tion other than to make manual removal of floatables difficult.  During cold
weather, 40°C and colder, a 38,000 K cal/hr space heater  (150,000 BTU/hr)
was set at about 4°C and aimed at the sampling equipment to assure operation
and liquid samples.  It is obvious that freeze protection is necessary any-
where .aqueous fluids are exposed.

Grube and Murphy (9) indicated a thick ice formation on the concrete block
oxidation ditch-clarifier building interior due to condensation.  The ice
did not create any problems, however.  They reported the building tempera-
ture remained relatively constant at 1.7°C.

At the Glenwood, Minnesota oxidation ditch  (11) only the rotors had any
climatic protection.  They were covered with a structure similar to that
at the. College oxidation ditch.

In subarctic climates, if sufficient care is used in the design of extended
aeration units, there is no reason to house the aeration basin.  Ranganathan
and Murphy  (10) reported that the College oxidation ditch accumulated a sheet
of  surface ice approximately 6 m  (20 ft) wide, 30 cm (1 ft) thick and 21 m
(70 ft) long by mid-April of 1971.  Solids concentration in the ice was
probably much higher than in the mixed liquor.  They reported that when the
ice melted it released large quantities of solids.
                                    68

-------
Clark, et_  al.  (8) have stated "When utilizing exposed basins, heat loss
effects must be evaluated in conjunction with detention time determinations
to avoid potential freezing problems.  Solids entrainment in ice can cause
failures of an  activated sludge process."  Concentrating waste sludge by
this method was discussed in Section VI.

During March of 1972, the sewage feed temperature for the EAFB units was
less than 4°C.   With a hydraulic detention of 1  day, a thin sheet of ice
formed on all basins except directly over aerators and air lift sludge
returns.  Based upon the author's experience, the following maximum ex-
posed aeration  basin (housed clarifiers) detentions should not be exceeded
where the average January temperature is less than -23°C (-10°F):

           Detention, Days          Sewage Temperature, ^C

                1                             5

                2                            10

                4                            20

It is possible  to operate with longer detentions at lower temperatures
but operating problems will increase exponentially.
                                    69

-------
                              SECTION  VIII

                       OTHER PERFORMANCE CRITERIA
NUTRIENTS
Nutrient removal  (N and P) is an important consideration in establishing
performance criteria.   In 1968,  Grube (9)  reported limited nitrogen  data
(four samples) for the College oxidation ditch.   He said, "The test  results
indicate that nitrification during periods of low temperature (<12°C),  is
almost nonexistent."  No phosphorus data has been published for the  College
oxidation ditch.

Results of nutrient analysis for cold room Pope  reactors are presented  in
Table 12.  As expected, there was not a great deal of activity at the lower
temperature.  There was an insignificant change  in nitrate and total  nitro-
gen at 6.5°C when going from 9 to 13 hours detention time.  This was also
true at 1.3°C to a lesser degree.  There was a greater reduction in  ammonia
nitrogen and a greater increase in nitrate nitrogen at 6.5°C than at 1.3°C.
Total nitrogen removals were much higher at 6.5°C than at 1.3°C with little
detention time effects.

Additional studies were undertaken at a later time using the 47.1-liter
reactor in an attempt to determine the effect of denitrification on  bulking
conditions.  Sampling points included influent,  effluent, reactor mixed
liquor and stations along the settling tube as shown in Figure 25.  Samples
were anlayzed for solids (TS, TVS, SS, V5S) and  nitrogen (NHg, N02,  N03,
Kjeldahl).  Dissolved oxygen levels were determined at the points sampled
using a polarographic probe.  Reactor temperature during these studies  was
^11°C and detention time 12 hours.

Samples were taken on six different days with results for a typical  day
presented in Figure 26.  Sludge level in the tube was just above the
T-4 sample point during sampling for this day.  Denitrification was  ob-
viously taking place.  Ammonia-nitrogen dropped  from 21 mg/1 in the  influent
to 2 mg/1 in the realtor mixed liquor while the  nitrate-nitrogen increased
to 15 mg/1.  The DO level dropped from 6 mg/1 in the reactor to 1.5  mg/1
at the lower end of the tube which was enough to cause a decrease in the
nitrate-nitrogen level for denitrification to begin.  The DO concentration
continued to drop slightly to the top of the sludge height in the tube.
Denitrification continued while the ammonia and  nitrite levels remained
the same.  The DO level increased again at the top of the tube and in the
effluent with reaeration due to the configuration of the reactor. As a
result, denitrification ceased and the ammonia and nitrite-nitrogen  were
converted to a nitrate.  There is little doubt that the low DO level  in the
tubes and the resultant denitrification contributed to the deterioration of
sludge settling characteristics as the reactor temperature was raised from
4° to 8°C.  This fact does not explain the initial bulking conditions,
though less severe, at temperatures below 8°C since nitrification should not
be expected to occur to any significant degree below 5°C (36).
                                    70

-------
                                   TABLE 12


                                CONE REACTORS

                         RESULTS OF NUTRIENT ANALYSIS

                            13 Hour Detention Time



NHg-N (Ammonia)
N02-N (Nitrite)
N03-N (Nitrate)
Kjeldahl-N (Nitrogen)
Total Nitrogen
Total Nitrogen
Removals (%)
0-P04
(Ortho-Phosphate)
1.3° REACTOR

Influent
22
.13
.13
41
41




20
Filtered
Effluent
19
.09
2.13
28
30

27

18
Unfiltered
Effluent
18
.05
2.02
29
31

24

18

Infl uent
19
.11
.21
37
37




19
6.5°C REACTOR
Filtered
Effluent
1
.13
9.17
3
12

67

18
Unfiltered
Effluent
1
.15
12.13
3
15

59

18
                             9 Hour Detention Time

NH2-N (Ammonia)
N02-N (Nitrite)
N03-N (Nitrate)
Kjeldahl-N (Nitrogen)
Total Nitrogen
Total Nitrogen
Removals (%)
0-P04
(Ortho-Phosphate)
1.3°C REACTOR 6.5°C REACTOR

Influent
21
.06
.11
36
36

17
Filtered
Effluent
19
.03
.68
26
27
26
14
Unfiltered
Effluent
19
.03
.54
27
28
24
15

Influent
21
.06
.07
35
35
19
Fi 1 tered
Effluent
1
.14
8.03
3
11
68
18
Unfil tered
Effluent
1
.12
14.45
3
18
50
16
(1)  Total nitrogen results reported are the sum of the nitrite, nitrate
    and  Kjeldahl nitrogen analysis.
                                       71

-------
DENITRIFICATION STUDY SAMPLE STATIONS
              FIGURE 25
                     72

-------
5000 f
-•  10
                                                     Effluent
                           FIGURE  26




       DENITRIFICATION STUDY, TUBE SETTLER NITROGEN PROFILE






                              73

-------
The EAFB nitrogen data is listed in Table 13.   Nitrogen removal was accom-
plished only at mixed liquor temperatures of 8°C or above.  Apparently,
at 8°C, the sludge age ,     Mass of MISS	. must be above 13 days for
                       %ss of SS Lost Per Day'
denitrification to occur.  At temperatures of 5°C or below, there was no
significant nitrification even with sludge ages of 100+ days.   It can be
surmised from the data on Table 13, that denitrification, i.e., nitrogen
gas formation, was not contributing to the bulking (SVI>100) conditions
in period III.

The phosphorus data on Table 14 shows  less than 10 percent removal which is
to be expected with the conventional  extended  aeration process.  One would
not think that phosphorus removal  would be affected by low temperatures.


TOTAL COLIFORMS


The percent total coliforms remaining  before chlorination at the EAFB pilot
units is listed in Table  15.   The  highest effluent coliform levels are gen-
erally associated with the highest effluent suspended solid levels and lowest
percent BOD removal.   These data indicate coliform removal  is  not directly
related to temperature but is dependent upon effluent solids levels.   Percent
total coliforms remaining can be somewhat misleading  because 98 percent total
coliform removal  (2 percent remaining)  may represent  10^, 10^,  or more total
coliform counts per 100 ml.   The coliform removals experienced  at the EAFB
pilot plant are similar to removals found in warmer temperature extended
aeration units.

No bacteriological data has been published for the College oxidation ditch.
                                   74

-------
                  TABLE 13
EIELSON AFB EXTENDED AERATION-NITROGEN CYCLE
        Concentrations  mg/liter as  N
Date
10/13/71
11/17/71
12/08/71
01/12/72
02/09/72
02/23/72
03/01/72
03/08/72
03/15/72
03/22/72
03/29/72
04/05/72
04/12/72
04/19/72
04/26/72
Feed
N02+
NO, NHo-N TKN-N
o O
0.14 14 23
0.05 22 32
0.31 24 26
0.14 24 25
0.02 25 27
0.02 24 26
0.02 26 27
0.03 21 29
0.02 23 26
0.03 21 26
0.02 21 27
0.02 24 27
0.03 24 27
0.02 28 33
0.02 15 22
Horizontal Effluent
N02 N03 NH3-H TKN-N
1.3 0.22 13 15
0.14 19 1.8 4.5
0.05 17 1 2
0.09 5.3 14 13
0.03 0.17 21 22
0.01 0.01 23 24
0.01 0.01 23 26
0.07 0.02 19 22
0.09 0.05 20 23
0.06 0.01 18 24
0.10 0.05 25 28
0.14 0.09 22 25
0.02 0.10 21 25
0.01 0.09 20 21
0.03 0.11 18 23
Upflow Effluent
N02 N03 NH3-N TKN-N
0.32 0.02 53 27
1.2 1.4 17 22
0.04 0.01 20 22
0.04 0.05 11 10
0.03 0.24 22 21
0.01 0.01 23 27
0.03 0.04 26 26
0.01 0.13 20 23
0.01 0.07 22 25
0.01 0.01 21 25
0.01 0.01 23 24
0.01 0.01 24 23
0.01 0.03 21 24
0.01 0.04 18 19
0.02 0.01 30 31
Horizontal
Mixed Liquor
T°C
15
10
8
4
3
5
2
0
1
1
3
5
--
5
3
Age
Days
50
22
80
32
17
24
83
167
130
132
—
308
63
491
778
Upflow
M i xed
T°C
15
12
8
4
3
5
2
0
2
1
3
4
--
5
4
Liquor
Age
Days
20
44
13
3
21
7
27
25
32
35
—
90
32
192
5

-------
                   TABLE 14
EIELSON AFB EXTENDED AERATION-PHOSPHORUS DATA



         Concentrations  mg/liter as  P
Date
12/08/71
01/12/72
02/09/72
02/23/72
03/01/72
03/08/72
03/15/72
03/22/72
04/05/72
04/12/72
04/19/72
T-
12
10
12
13
13
14
11
13
12
14
10
Feed
P 0-P
14
10
12
14
13
13
11
13
13
14
10
Average Percent Removal
Horizontal
Effluent
T-P 0-P
11
10
11
12
13
13
10
13
13
11
8.7
7
13
10
10
13
13
13
10
12
12
15
9.1
5
Upflow
Effluent
T-P 0-P
13
3
9
13
13
13
10
13
12
15
8.9
8
15
3
10
13
14
13
8
13
13
14
9.1
9
                      76

-------
                  TABLE 15

              EAFB PILOT UNITS
TOTAL COLIFORMS REMAINING BEFORE CHLORINATION
Period
I
I
II
II
III
III
Side
Horizontal
Up
Horizontal
Up
Horizontal
Up
Average
Mixed Liquor
Temp. °C
12
12
4
4
4
4
Average %
BOD Removal
81
82
10
-30
84
76
Average
Eff. SS
mg/1
36
99
134
122
17
50
Average %
Total
Col i forms
Remaining
1.7
10
14
26
1.8
2.6
                     77

-------
                               SECTION  IX

                               REFERENCES


 1    Grube,  Gareth Alden.   "Evaluation  of  an Oxidation  Ditch  Activated Sludge
     Plant in  Subarctic Alaska."  M.S.  Thesis.  College, Alaska.   University
     of Alaska.   May  1968.

 2.   Alter,  Amos  J.   "Sewerage  and  Sewage  Disposal  in Cold  Climates."   Cold
     Regions Science  and  Engineering  Monograph  111-C56.  Corps  of Engineers,
     U.S.  Army Cold  Regions Research  and Engineering Laboratory.   DA Project
     1T062112A130.   October 1969.

 3.   Stewart,  Marvin  J.   "Activated Sludge Process  Variations—the Complete
     Spectrum."   In:   Water and Sewage  Works_.   December 1964.   pp.  R2-41  -
     R2-62.

 4.   Conley, Walter  R. and  Alfred F-  Slechta.   "Recent  Experiences  in  Plant
     Scale Application of the Settling  Tube Concept."   In:  Proceedings
     Water Pollution  Control Federation's  43rd  Annual Conference.   Boston,
     1970.

 5.   American  Public  Health Association.   Standard  Methods  for  the  Examina-
     tion  of Water and Wastewater.  12th Edition.   New  York.  1955.

 6.   FWPCA Methods for Chemical  Analysis of Water and Hastes.   Cincinnati.
     Federal  Water Pollution Control  Administration, Division of  Water
     Quality Research. November 1969.

 7.   Johnson,  Philip  R. and Charles W.  Hartrrwi.  Environmental  Atlas of
     Alaska.   College, Alaska.   Institute  of Arctic Environmental  Engineering,
     Institute of Water Resources,  University of Alaska.  1969.

 8.   Clark,  Sidney E., Harold J. Coutts, and Conrad D.  Christiansen.   "Design
     Considerations  for Extended Aeration  in Alaska."   In:  Proceedings of
     the International Symposium on Water  Pollution Control in  Cold  Climates.
     College,  Alaska, University of Alaska. July 1970.

 9.   Grube,  Gareth Alden, and R. Sage Murphy.   "Oxidation Ditch Works  Well
     in Subarctic Climates."  In:   Water and Sewage Works,  116, No.  7.
     July  1969.                                   	

10.   Ranganathan, K.  R. and R.  Sage Murphy.  "Bio-Process of  the  Oxidation
     Ditch when  Subjected to a  Subarctic Climate."  Institute of  Water
     Resources,  University  of Alaska.   College, Alaska.  Report No.  IWR-27.
     May 1972.

11.   Anonymous.   "Report  on Operation of Oxidation  Ditch Sewage Treatment
     Plant,  Glenwood, Minnesota."   Department of Health, Division  of
     Environmental Health,  Section  on Water Pollution Control.  July 1965.

12.   Porges,  Ralph and Grover L. Morris.   Extended  Aeration Sewage Treat-
     ment. U.S.  Department  of Health, Education and Welfare,  Robert  A. Taft
     Sanitary  Engineering Center, Technical Services Branch.  Cincinnati
     June  1960.
                                   78

-------
13.   National  Sanitation Foundation.   Package Sewage  Treatment  Plant
     Criteria  Development:   Part I.   Extended Aeration.   1966.

14.   Wuhrmann, K.   "Research Development in Regard  to Concept and  Base
     Values  of the Activated Sludge  System."   In:   Advances  in  Water  Quality
     Improvement,  Gloyna,  E.  F-  and  W.  W.  Eckenfelder (eds.)~Austin,
     Texas,  University of  Texas  Press.  1968.

15.   Reed, Sherwood C.  and  R.  Sage Murphy.   "Low Temperature Activated
     Sludge  Settling."   In:   Journal  of the Sanitary  Engineering Division
     Proceedings of American Society  of Civil  Engineers,  95, No. SA4.
     August  1969.

16.   Benedict, Arthur  H.   "Organic Loading  and  Temperature  in Bio-oxidation."
     Ph.D. Thesis.   University of Washington.   1968.

17.   McKinney, Ross E.  and  Andrew Gram.   "Protozoa  and Activated Sludge."
     In:   Sewage and Industrial  Wastes,  Vol.  28, No.  10.  October 1956.

18.   Ludzack,  F. J.   "Observations on  Bench Scale Extended Aeration Sewage
     Treatment."   In:   Journal Water  Pollution  Control Federation, Vol.  3,
     8:1092-1100.  August 1965.

19.   Hansen, Sigurd P.  and  Gordon L.  Gulp.   "Applying Shallow Depth Sedi-
     mentation Theory."  In:   Journal American  Water  Works Association,
     Vol.  59,  No.  9. September 1967.

20.   Hansen, Sigurd P.,  Gordon L. Gulp,  and John R. Stukenberg.  "Practical
     Application of Idealized  Sedimentation Theory."   In:  Proceedings  of
     1967 Water Pollution  Control Federation  Conference.  New York.
     October 1967.

21.  Pohl, E.  F. ,  Chief, Sanitary Engineering Section, U.S.  Army Corps  of
     Engineers, Anchorage,  Alaska.   Personal  communications.  April 22,  1970.

22.  Downing,  A. L.  "Factors  to be  Considered  in the Design of Activated
     Sludge  Plants."  In:   Advances  on  Water Quality  Improvement.  University
     of Texas  Press, 1968.   pp 190-202.

23.  Reed, Sherwood C. and Allan W.  Crouther.  "Single Tank  Secondary
     Sewage Treatment for the Arctic."   In:  Proceedings  of  the ASCE  Cold
     Regions  Engineering 21st Alaskan Science Conference.   College, Alaska.
     University of  Alaska.August 1970.

24.  Reed, Sherwood C. , Sanitary Engineer, Construction  Engineering,  U.S.
     Army Cold Regions  Research and Engineering Laboratory,  Hanover,  New
     Hampshire.  Personal communications.  April 27,  1970,  and  March  1972.

25.  Hunter,  T. V., E.  J. Gentelli, and M. E. Gilwood.  "Temperature  and
     Retention Time Relationships in the Activated Sludge Process."   In:
     Proceedings  of the 21st  Industrial Waste Conference.  Purdue  University.
     1966.
                                       79

-------
26.   Thomas,  Harold Allen,  Jr.   "Report  on  Investigation  of Sewage Treat-
     ment in  Low Temperature  Areas."   For:   Subcommittee  on Waste  Disposal,
     Committee on Sanitary  Engineering,  National  Research  Council.   May
     1950.

27.   Anonymous.   "Operating Manual  for Small  Extended  Aeration,  Activated
     Sludge Treatment Plants."   Alaska Department of Health and  Welfare,
     Division of Public  Health.   Juneau, Alaska.   1963.

28.   Morris,  Grover L.,  Lowell  Vandenberg,  Gordon L. Gulp,  John  R.  Geckler,
     and Ralph Porges.   Extended Aeration Plants  and Intermittent  Water
     Courses.  Department of  Health,  Education  and Welfare, Robert A.  Taft
     Sanitary Engineering Center, Technical  Services Branch.   Cincinnati.
     July 1963.

29.   U.S. Environmental  Protection  Agency.   "Evaluation of  Conditioning
     and Dewatering Sewage  Sludge by  Freezing."   Office of  Research and
     Monitoring.  Water  Pollution Control Research Series  11010  EVE 01/71.
     January 1971.

30.   Goodman, B. L.   Manual for Activated Sludge  Sewage Treatment  and
     Design Handbook of  Wastewater  Systems.   Westport, Connecticut,
     Technomic Publishing Company.  1971.

31.   McKinney, Ross  E. and  W. J.  O'Brien.   "Activated  Sludge—Basic Design
     Concepts."   In:   Journal of the  Water  Pollution Control  Federation,
     Vol. 40, No. 11, Part  1. November 1968.

32.   Eckenfelder, Wesley, Jr. and D.  J.  O'Connor.  Biological  Waste Treat-
     ment.   Long Island, Pergamon Press. 1961.

33.   Anonymous.   "Effect of Water Temperature on  Stream Regeneration."  In:
     Journal  of the Sanitary  Engineering Division, Proceedings of  the  Ameri-
     can Society of Civil Engineers,  87, No.  SA6, Thirty-first Progress
     Report.   Committee  on  Sanitary Engineering Research.   November 1961.

34.   Terashima,  Shigeo,  Keiichi  Koyama,  and Yasumoto Nagara.   "Biological
     Sewage Treatment in Cold Climate Areas."   In:  Proceedings  of the
     International  Symposium  on Water Pollution Control in  Cold  C1imates.
     College, Alaska, University of Alaska.  July  1970.

35.   Heukelekian, H.  and E. Wiesburg.  "Bound Water and Activated  Sludge
     Bulking."  In:   Sewage and Industrial  Wastes, Vol. 28, 4:558.  April
     1956.

36.   Zanoni,  A.  E.   "Secondary  Effluent  Deoxygenation  at  Different Tempera-
     tures."   In:  Journal  Water Pollution  Control Federation, Vol.  41,
     No.  4. April 1969.           '                 '  ~      ~     ~~~
                                    80

-------
                               SECTION  X


                               GLOSSARY



BOD - Biochemical Oxygen Demand, 5 day  - 20°C


cnim - cubic meters per minute


COD - Chemical  Oxygen Demand, dichromate oxidation


DO - Dissolved  Oxygen


EAFB - Eielson  Air Force Base

      2
gpm/ft  - gallons per minute per  square foot


!< cal - kilogram calories


Ib - pound mass


LU   liter(s)

  2
m  - sq m - square meter(s)

 o
rn  - cu m - cubic meter(s)


mg - milligram  mass


MG - million gall on(s)


MGD - million gallons  per  day


MISS - mixed liquor  suspended solids


HLVSS - mixed  liquor volatile suspended  solids

0-P - orthophosphate


SCF - standard  cubic feet


SCFM - standard cubic feet per minute


SS - suspended solids


SVI - sludge volume index


T-P   total phosphate


TS -  total  solids

TVS  - total volatile  solids


VSS  -  volatile suspended  solids


                                   81

-------
                                  TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                           (I'lfttsc read iHslnicllons on ilic reverse before completing)
I Ml. COM I NO.

1PA- 660/2- 74.-070
I. IITLL ANO SUOIITLE
                             2.
                                                          3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
                                                          6. REPORT DATE
 Extended Aeration Sewage Treatment  in Cold Climates
                                                          e. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE

                                                            66021000
                                                                      1 Q7A
 AUTMOHOI

 H.  J.  Coutts and C.  D.  Christiansen
                                                          8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9 I'l Hf-OMMINO O«G '\NlZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
 U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency
 Arctic Environmental  Research Laboratory
 National Environmental  Research Center
 College. Alaska   99701
                                                          10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.

                                                            1BB044
                                                          11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
  . SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
 U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency
                                                          13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                                                          14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
IB, SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
TOT ABSTRACT
      In an effort  to  develop design criteria  for biological treatment of low tempera-
 ture domestic sewages,  the Arctic Environmental  Research Laboratory has designed and
 operated two parallel  low temperature extended aeration units near  Fairbanks, Alaska.
 The two units had  exposed aeration basins  utilizing submerged aerators and were dif-
 ferentiated by  type of clarifier.  One unit  had  conventional horizontal  flow clari-
 fier while the  other  had a modified upflow clarifier with tube  settlers.  The liquid
 temperature varied from 0°C to 19°C.  In addition, 0.5 MGD subarctic, oxidation ditch
 and low temperature bench scale units were studied.

      Organic loading  was the parameter most  seriously affected  by low temperatures.
 It was found that  BOD removals above 80% at  liquid temperatures  below 7°C could gen-
 erally be maintained  at loadings of 0.08 Kg  BOD/Kg MLSS/Day or  less.   As in warmer
 climates, intentional  sludge wastage was found to be required.   Low temperature
 solids accumulation rates indicated that standard wastage criteria  of 0.5 Kg SS/Kg
 BOD is usually  adequate.

 Other parameters  investigated and reported were:  (1) aeration  for  oxygen transfer
 and mixing; (2) comparative clarifier performance; (3) nutrient  and total coliform
 removals.   	•			
                               KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                 DESCRIPTORS
  waste treatment,  sewage treatment,
 biological waste  treatment, low tempera-
 ture activated  sludge, cold regions ex-
 tended aeration,  subarctic, Alaska,
 domestic  sewage
                                             b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS  C.  COSATI Field/Group
                                             subarctic, activated
                                             sludge, extended  aera-
                                             tion, aeration, clarifi-
                                             cation, organics,
                                             coliforms, nutrients
 fl. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
                                             10. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport/
                                                                       21. NO. OF PAGES
                                             20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
                                                                       22. PRICE
CPA form 23Z(M (»-73)
                             U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: I975-697-9W/89 REGION 10

-------