660/3-74-016

   1974
                    Ecological Research Series
The Significance And  Control  of

Wastewater Floatables

 In Coastal Waters


                             Office of Research and Development

                             U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

                             Washington, D.C. 20460

-------
            RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES
Research reports of the  office  of  Research  and
Monitoring,   Environmental Protection Agency,  have
been grouped  into five series.  These   five   broad
categories  were established to facilitate further
development   and  application   of   environmental
technology.    Elimination  of traditional grouping
was  consciously  planned  to  foster    technology
transfer   and  a  maximum  interface   in  related
fields.  The  five series are:

   1.  Environmental Health Effects Research
   2.  Environmental Protection Technology
   3.  Ecological Research
   4.  Environmental Monitoring
   5.  Socioeconomic Environmental studies

This report has been assigned  to  the   ECOLOGICAL
RESEARCH   series.   This series describes research
on the effects of pollution on humans,   plant  and
animal   species,  and  materials.   Problems  are
assessed   for   their   long-   and     short-term
influences.     Investigations  include   formation,
transport, and pathway studies  to  determine  the
fate  of   pollutants and their effects.  This work
provides the  technical basis for setting standards
to  minimize    undesirable   changes    in    living
organisms   in   the   aquatic,   terrestrial  and
atmospheric environments.
                   EPA REVIEW NOTICE
This report has been reviewed by the Office of Research and
Development, EPA, and approved for publication.  Approval
does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the
views and policies of the Environmental Protection Agency,
nor does mention of trade names or commercial products
constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

-------
                                    EPA-66o/3-7^-Ol6
                                    January
THE SIGNIFICANCE AND CONTROL OF WASTEWATER

       FLOATABLES IN COASTAL WATERS
                    By

             Robert E. Selleck
            Lloyd W. Bracewell
                Half Carter
           Contract No. R-800373
          Program Element 1BA025
            Roap/Task 21 AIS l6
              Project Officer

             Walter F. Rittall
   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  National Environmental Research Center
         Corvallis, Oregon  97330
               Prepared for

    OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
   U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
           WASHINGTON, DC  20U60

-------
                               ABSTRACT

The significance of flotage derived from submerged primary  effluent  plumes
in the Southern California Bight is evaluated in terms  of three  components:
particulates * 0.5 mm in size, particulates  z 0.1  mm in size,  and  surface
film materials.  The sampling methods  utilized to collect the  flotage  from
the surface are described in detail.   The surface film  and  micro-particulates
were captured by fabric screen samplers developed during the course  of the
study.

It was found that the large particulates penetrated the ocean  thermocline
and gathered on the surface in profusion.  The grease and wax  portions  of
the particulates could be measured reliably with hexane extraction,  with the
mass of HEM of sewage origin being in  the order of a metric ton  on the  water
surface within the study area.  Such  particulates  contained considerable
numbers of coliform bacteria but little PCB  compounds or pesticides.

The surface film materials and/or micro-parti culates contained significant
concentrations of coliform organisms  and PCB compounds, but not  pesticides.
The HEM derived from this type of flotage may have amounted to 300 kg  on
the water surface within the study area in July 1973.

Regulations for controlling the concentration of flotage on the  ocean  surface
are suggested after considerable discussion.

This report was submitted by the Sanitary Engineering Research Laboratory
of the University of California, Berkeley, in fulfillment of Grant Number
R-800373, under the sponsorship of the Office of Research and  Development
of the Environmental Protection Agency.
                                  111

-------
                           TABLE OF CONTENTS
                                                                     Page
Abstract	    iii
List of Figures	    vii
List of Tables   	     ix

Sections
   I.    CONCLUSIONS   	      1
             Trawled Particulates  	      1
             Micro-Particulates  	      2
             Surface Screen Samples  	      3
  II.  RECOMMENDATIONS 	      6
 III.  INTRODUCTION  	      7
  IV.  DESCRIPTION OF OCEAN SURVEYS  	     10
             Effluent Plume Submergence  	     12
             Surface Conditions During Surveys	     20
             Discussion	     29
   V.  TRAWLED PARTICULATES  	     34
             Description  of Trawls	     36
             Results of Surveys	     39
             Proof of Wastewater Derivation of Particulates   ...     44
             Measurement  of Surface Pollution  	     46
             Significance of Surface Pollution  	     54
             Control  of Surface Pollution  ......  	     65
  VI.  MICRO-PARTICULATES	  .     69

-------
                     TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Section                                                             Page

             Sampling Procedure 	   69
             Analytical Procedure   	   70
             Results	   70
             Conclusions	   75
 VII.    SURFACE SCREEN SAMPLES   	   76
             Sampling Procedure   	   76
             Sampling and Analytical Accuracy   	   77
             Results of Surveys	   79
             Discussion of Results  	   85
             Origins of Cloth Screen Fatty Acids  	   96
             The Significance of the Surface Pollution  	   96
             Control of the Surface Pollution   	   97
VIII.    REFERENCES   	100
  IX.    GLOSSARY	102
APPENDICES
   A.  Miscellaneous Tables   	  103
   B.  Analytical Methods   	109
                                   VI

-------
                            LIST OF FIGURES
F1gure                           Title                              Page
   1.     Study Area	    11
   2.     Temperature Profiles  Observed  at  Samping Stations:
         April, 1971  	    13
   3.     Water Density Profiles: April,  1971   	    14
   4.     Temperature Profiles  Observed  at  Sampling Stations:
         August-September,  1971    	    15
   5.     Water Density Profiles:  August-September,  1971   ....    16
   6.     Temperature Profiles  Observed  at  Sampling Stations:
         July 1973    	    17
   7.     Surface Conditions  in Hyperion  Outfall  Region:
         April 7, 1971  	    22
   8.     Surface Conditions  in Control  Areas:  April 4  and
         September 2, 1971   	    23
   9.     Surface Conditions  in Hyperion  Outfall  Region:
         August 31 and September 1, 1971   	    24
  10.     Surface Conditions  Over JWPCP  Outfalls:
         September 3, 1971   	    26
  11.     Transport of Flotage  Study:  December  9, 1971    	    27
  12.     Surface Conditions  Over JWPCP  Outfalls: July 11,  1973   .    28
  13.     Surface Conditions  Off Marineland:  July 12, 1973  ....    30
  14.     Surface Conditions  in Control  Area: July 13, 1973   ...    31
  15.     Photographs of Sea  Slicks	   117
  16.     Trawl Net Sampler	    35
  17.     Cumulative Frequency  Distribution of  Grease and
         Wax, and Tar Particulates: August-September, 1971   ...    42
  18.     Rise of Large Particulates in  the Vicinity  of  the L
         Diffuser of the JWPCP Outfalls:   July,  1973  ......   119

-------
                      LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)
Figure                           Title
  19.     Fatty Acid Composition  of Large  Particulates:
         July, 1973	    119
  20.     Comparison of Grease and Wax Particulates  With
         Non-Extractable Sewage  Types   	     47
  24.     Comparison of Grease and Wax Particulates  with  HEM   .  .     49
  22.     Fatty Acid Proportion of HEM   	     51
  23.     Comparison of Total  Dry Weight with  HEM	     53
  24.     Example of Aesthetic Rating  Sheet  for  Evaluating
         Ocean Surface Pollution  	     55
  25.     Cumulative Frequency Distributions of  Coliform
         Bacteria Surface Concentration:  1971    	     57
  26.     Estimate of Mass of  Wastewater HEM Present on Ocean
         Surface - Trawl Samples  	     59
  27.     Cumulative Frequency Distribution  of Clumps of  Debris
         Collected by the Nylon  Netting:  August-September 1971   .     73
  28.     Cumulative Frequency Distribution  of Coliform
         Bacteria Found in Screen Samples Taken Over the
         Outfalls:  April and September,  1971  	     87
  29.     Cumulative Frequency Distribution  of HEM  Found  in
         Cloth Screen Samples in Control  Area:  July, 1973 ....     91
  30.     Fatty Acid Composition  of Cloth  Screen Samples:
         July, 1973	     94
  31.     Analytical Approach  to  Characterizing  Flotage and
         Bulk Samples	    Ill

-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table
1.
2.

3.
4.
5.

6.

7.
8.
9.
10.

11.

12.
13.

14.

15.
16.

17.

18.

Title
Characteristics of Outfalls Samples 	
Calculated Plume Submergence and Dilution Over
Marine Outfalls 	
Summary of Surface Trawls 	
Summary of Surface Trawls - Col i form Bacteria ....
Concentration and Sizes of Prevalent Trawled
Parti culates 	
Explanation of Figure 19, Fatty Acid Composition of
Large Parti culates 	
Comparison of Aesthetic Impact with HEM 	
Comparison of Col i form Bacteria with HEM 	
Mean Concentrations of HEM in Trawled Parti culates . .
Analyses of 24-Hr Composite Samples of Hyperion
Effluent During Ocean Surveys of 1971 	
Mass Emission Rates of Parti cul ate HEM From
Treatment Plants 	
Local Mass Balance on HEM of Trawled Parti culates . . .
Composition and Concentration of Parti culates
Captured by the Cloth Screen Sampler 	
Sizes of Prevalent Types of Parti culates Captured
by the Cloth Screen Sampler: August-September, 1971 . .
Concentration of Cloth Screen HEM 	
Concentration of Cloth Screen Fatty Acids:
July, 1973 	
Mean Concentrations of Cloth Screen HEM and
Fatty Acids 	 	 	 	 .
Concentration of Col i form Bacteria: Cloth Screen
and Ocean Water Samples 	 ...
Page
18

19
37
39

41

U5
55
57
58

60

62
63

71

74
80

82

83

84
     IX

-------
                       LIST OF TABLES  (Continued)
Table                            Title                             Page
  19.    Concentration of Cloth Screen PCB  Compounds  	    85
  20.    Comparison of Ocean Water and Surface  Concentrations
         of Aroclor 1254:  July, 1973   	    88
  21.    Pan Data for JWPCP Effluent   	  .......    92
  22.    Fatty Acid Composition of Cloth  Screen Samples:
         July 1973   	    93
  23.    Fatty Acid Composition of Bulk Ocean Samples:
         July 1973   	    95
  24.    Estimated Concentration of HEM of  Wastewater Origins
         in Cloth Screen Samples   	    97
  25.    Ocean Currents at Hyperion Outfall  	   104
  26.    Ocean Currents in August-September 1971 Survey	   105
  27.    Description of Trawled Particulates: Over Outfalls   ...   106
  28.    Description of Particulates:   3.7  KM N of Hyperion
         Outfall	   107
  29.    Description of Particulates Collected: Control Area .  .  .   108

-------
                            ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The continued interest and assistance of Dr.  Donald  J.  Baumgartner, Program
Chief of the National Coastal Pollution Research  Program,  Environmental
Protection Agency, and Mr. Walter F.  Rittall, Grant  Project  Officer,  is
acknowledged with thanks.  Also, the aid of Dr.  Joseph  Blazevich  of the
Corvallis, Oregon Laboratory in supplying standards  and suggestions for
methods of analysis is recognized and fully appreciated.

Professor Robert E. Selleck was the faculty investigator of  the project,
acting in behalf of The Regents of the University of California,  and
Dr. Ralf C. Carter was the project director during the  1971  studies and
Mr. Lloyd Bracewell during the 1973 work.  Professor Pat Wilde, co-faculty
investigator, was primarily responsible for the  conduct of the various oceano-
graphic studies and Professor David I. Jenkins aided in the  development of
the analytical techniques.

Under the direction of Dr. George Hlavka, SCCWRP  supplied  the means for
conducting the survey work off the coast of Southern California in 1971.
The assistance of Mr. Chen-Shyong Young, Sanitary Engineer of SCCWRP,
during that time is especially acknowledged.

Mr. Al Leipzig, Chief Engineer, and Mr. William  Garber, Assistant Chief
Engineer, and the staff of the Hyperion Wastewater Treatment Plant aided
the 1971 study greatly by collecting and analyzing samples of their
wastewater effluent during the field surveys, and by making  arrangements
with the City of Los Angeles for the use of the  survey  boat  "Marine
Surveyor" in the 1973 program of studies.  The generosity  of the  City
Council of Los Angeles in permitting the use of  their survey boat without
compensation in the 1973 survey is also gratefully acknowledged.

The cooperation of Mr. Roger Beeken, Plant Engineer of  the County of  Los
Angeles JWPCP, and staff in the collection of effluent  samples and permission
                                  XI

-------
for the use of their facilities during the 1973 study is  likewise deeply
appreciated.

The advice and most generous assistance of Dr.  Fred K.  Kawahara,  Special
Consultant - Oil Identification, Analytical  Quality Control  Laboratory
(Environmental Protection Agency), Cincinnati,  Ohio, in the  development of
the fatty acid analysis for hexane extractables is recognized and appreciated
fully.
                                  xii

-------
                             I.  CONCLUSIONS

The following applies to primary (or a combination of primary and secondary)
wastewater effluent plumes submerged 12 to 30 m beneath the ocean surface.

TRAWLED PARTICULATES  (>0.5 mm in size)

1.  Grease and wax particulates always predominated over all other sewage
types.  The mean grease and wax particulate found over the marine outfalls
had the following characteristics:
     Size = 1.3 mm
     Hexane Extractable Materials (HEM) = 1.0 mg
     Coliform Bacteria ^ 2 x 101* organisms
     Composition of HEM
         PCB < 0.10%
         Free Fatty Acids =10%
         Fats = 20%
         Alkanes = 20%
         Unidentified Long-Chain Organics = 10%
         Bound Water = 40%
Their size remained constant regardless of distance from the outfalls but
their free fatty acid composition altered significantly.

2.  The number of grease and wax particulates found in a sample usually
correlated directly with the mg of HEM extracted from the sample, regardless
of location.  Interferences in the correlation were caused by pieces  of tar.

3.  The mass of HEM on the water surface within the study area may have
averaged approximately 840 kg during the surveys of 1971 and 1973.  The concen-
tration of HEM ranged from a maximum of approximately 33 mg/m2 over the outfalls
to a minimum of 0.001 mg/m2 in the control areas.

4.  The free fatty acid compositions of particulates strained from the JWPCP
effluent and collected over the outfalls at the same time were nearly identical.

                                    1

-------
5.  Local  mass balances  made about the  marine  outfalls indicated that an
appreciable portion of the large particulates  must have attained the ocean
surface even when the effluent plumes were  submerged.

6.  Evidence indicates that the grease  and  wax particulates can persist for long
periods of time in the marine environment.   Their ultimate destination was not-
ascertained definitively but a study using  floating  polyethelene pellets indi-
cated that the particulates could move  with the band type of sea slicks.  The
band slicks formed under wind speeds of less than 3-4 m/s.  They always moved
toward the mainland, independent of the wind direction and probably were asso-
ciated with the internal waves, moving  with the same speed and in the same
direction as the internal waves.  When  the  wind speed exceeded 4 m/s the band
slicks were destroyed quickly and Langmuir  mixing cells formed.  The particulates
were then either transported downwind or submerged under the ocean surface.

7.  The mass emission rate of particulate HEM  from the Hyperion and JWPCP
outfalls was estimated to be approximately  1000 kg/day.  In light of No. 3
above this implies a surface residence  time of only  one day in the study area.
Either the particulates clustered in regions not sampled, or they were moved
quickly out of the study area by wind and band slick influences of the type
described in No. 6 above.

8.  The grease and wax particulates contained  from 2 x 103 to 2 x 104 coliform
bacteria per mg of HEM within the vicinity  of  the marine outfalls.  The bacteria
were found in particulates captured as  far  as  4 km from the Hyperion outfall.

9.  A suggested surface pollution control requirement for HEM, based on
aesthetic and coliform bacteria considerations, is 1.0 mg/m2 or less (exclusive
of tar).  This is 10 times lower than the current State of California require-
ment for ocean waters.  No control requirement for nonextractable particulates
is suggested because their concentrations were too small to be aesthetically
objectionable, and their ecological significance was unknown to these investigate!

MICRO-PARTICULATES (<0.1 mm in size)

1.  The surface concentration of the micro-particulates exceeded a million/m2
at times.  Their overall volume per unit surface area may have been greater
than the trawled particulates and their sizes  ranged from the minimum
detectable limit of approximately one y to  100 y.

-------
2.  The concentrations and types of micro-particulates observed varied
grossly between the two surveys of 1971,  Their overall concentration generally
was 2 to 3 times greater over the Hyperion outfall than elsewhere but their
sources or chemical composition were not ascertained.  Sampling for micro-
particulates was discontinued after 1971.

SURFACE SCREEN SAMPLES

1.  The glass cloth sampler collected duplex and stable monolayer surface
films accurately (within approximately 10% for duplex films and 5% for
monolayers).

2.  PCB compounds appeared to be concentrated in the sea slicks found over
the marine outfalls.  A volumetric concentration as high as 0.8 mg/£ as
Aroclor 1254 was found over the Hyperion outfall in April 1971.

3.  The average surface concentration of PCB was estimated to be 2.8 yg/m2
(or 19 yg/£) as Aroclor 1254 in the study area in July 1973.  The bulk ocean
water concentration 0.5 m below the surface averaged about 0.050 yg/£.
These data indicate that the PCB compounds were concentrated by a factor of
at least 380 times on the ocean surface.

4.  The surface and bulk water concentrations of PCB were four times higher
in the region of the JWPCP outfalls than in the control area in July 1973,
or twice the average values found throughout the study area at that time.
The wastewater mass emission of PCB to the study area may have ranged from 3
to 10 kg/day as Aroclor 1254, but the significance of this material in terms
of ocean surface pollution could not be ascertained because the surface  PCB
compounds could have been derived from atmospheric fallout as well as
wastewater discharge.  Concentrations of pesticides were always at least
10 times less than the PCB compounds in the 1973 survey.

5.  Coliform bacteria were found in the screen samples collected over the
wastewater outfalls in 1971.  (No bacterial samples were collected in
1973.)  The surface concentration very nearly exceeded 1000 organisms/m2

-------
in 20% of the samples taken.   This  level  corresponds  to  a  volumetric concen-
tration of at least 1000 organisms/100  ma.   No  coliform  bacteria were found
in 100 ma bulk water samples  collected  10 cm underneath  the ocean surface,
nor in regions well removed from the marine outfalls.

6.  The average surface concentration of  free stearic acid (C18) was esti-
mated to be 4.0 yg/m2 (or 27 ygA)  in the study area  in  July  1973.  The
concentration was 20 times higher over  the  JWPCP outfalls  than in the control
area, or more than three times the  average  study area value.  The proportion
of free stearic acid in the HEM decreased from  1.4% over the  JWPCP outfalls
to 0.33% in the control area.  The  bulk ocean water concentration of stearic
acid (salts and free) 0.5 m below the surface was approximately constant at
1.0 yg/Jt, regardless of location.

7.  Very little free stearic acid was recovered from  JWPCP effluent diluted
with sea water in a pan in July 1973.  The  diluted effluent contained 150 yg/fc
of stearic acid for a total of 5.4 mg,  but  only 0.3%  of  this  free stearic
acid was recovered in six cloth samples taken consecutively from the water
surface.  The free stearic acid comprised on the average about 2.0% of the
surface HEM.

8.  In light of No. 6 and 7 above it was  concluded that  the free stearic
acid was recovered primarily from micro-particulates  which inhibited the
salting out of this acid.  This conclusion  conforms to theory as well as
such theory is known.

9.  Using the free stearic acid as  a tracer of  micro-particulates of wastewater
origin, the surface HEM derived from wastewater emissions  was estimated to
be 300 kg in the study area in July 1973.

10. The HEM determinations proved of little value in  ascertaining surface
pollution of wastewater origin, or the  reason for the existence of sea slicks.
The observed concentrations were highly variable, ranging  from 0.9 to 3.9
mg/m2 over the marine outfalls and from 0.16 to 2.0 mg/m2  in  the control areas.

-------
11. The HEM analysis can be used only to control surface pollution resulting
from duplex (oil) films or unusually high concentrations of wastewater micro-
parti culates.   It is too gross a measure to control any pollution existing
in the form of surface monolayers.

12. At the present time only the coliform bacteria analysis can be used to
reliably control surface pollution derived solely from wastewater discharges.
A criterion of 1000 total coliform organisms per m2 of ocean surface is
suggested but with reservation because such a criterion could prove to be
extremely difficult to meet.

-------
                           II.   RECOMMENDATIONS

1.  A great amount of work remains to ascertain the composition and mode
of formation of sea slicks.  Much of this would be strictly of scientific
interest, but it would provide  a better means of estimating the proportion
of the surface film material derived from wastewater discharges as  well as
its ultimate destination.  For  example, reliable methods  of acidifying and
saponifying the glass cloth samplers should be developed  to increase the
yield of HEM and fatty acids.   Also, the relationship between the fatty
acids and their salts at the ocean interface has to be more fully understood
with the aid of laboratory studies.

2.  Reliable methods of sampling wastewater effluents for surface film
forming substances remain to be developed.  Simply screening from the top
of effluent diluted with salt or fresh water yields information on the
composition of the flotage, but not its total amount because an equilibrium
appears to be established between the surface and bulk phase which  is quickly
reestablished upon removal of material from the surface.   This process appears
to continue indefinitely.  It should be pointed out here  that the composi-
tion of the flotage may differ  appreciably between salt and fresh diluting
waters.

3.  The characteristics of the  flotage, if any, derived from secondary
effluents remains to be ascertained.  It is possible that surfacing secondary
effluent plumes could produce measurable quantities of surface flotage.

4.  The effect of wastewater effluent chlorination on coliform bacteria
contained in trawled and micro-particulates remains to be ascertained.

5.  To complete the study discussed herein, measurements  should be made on
surfacing primary effluent plumes.  This would enable a more direct means of
establishing relationships between cause and effect.  For example, the
quantities of surface PCB compounds derived from a wastewater effluent
could be determined quantitatively under such circumstances.

-------
                            III.  INTRODUCTION

The general objective of the first year of this study was to develop sampling
and analytical techniques suitable for the evaluation of flotage at the sur-
face of marine waters.  Only a minimum of ocean work was to be carried out,
primarily to determine the feasibility of the techniques developed and to
obtain data for an initial assessment of the surface pollution problem.
Emphasis was placed on the following items:
    1.  The development and evaluation of sampling and analytical  techniques
        for surface films.
    2.  The development and evaluation of sampling and analytical  techniques
        for floating particulates.
    3.  The development and evaluation of sampling and analytical  techniques
        for other components of the flotage.
    4.  Evaluation of ocean data obtained in order to provide an initial
        assessment of the surface pollution problem.

The second year of the study was to be devoted primarily to ocean  studies,
the specific objectives of which were:
    1.  The measurement of flotage found in the vicinity of a marine outfall
        and comparison with that from a region free of water surface
        pollution.
    2.  Investigation of the mechanisms responsible for the concentration
        and movement of flotage on the sea surface during the periods of
        sampling.

The study objectives were also to include suggestions for the establishment
of water surface quality requirements to be used for control of ocean surface
and beach pollution.

The terms of the award made by the Environmental Protection Agency to The
Regents of the University of California included the following conditions:
    1.  Both screen and trawled particulates will be characterized.

                                     7

-------
    2.  Particulates will be classified according to size.
    3.  The analysis of inorganic and organic parameters  will  be conducted
        on both film and particulates.
    4.  Coliform and, if possible, virus concentrations  of  film and parti -
        culates will be enumerated.
    5.  The wastes sampled in the ocean will be correlated  with raw water
        samples, preferably by sampling from the same waste volume.

The only one of those conditions which modified substantially  the proposed
work was item 4, i.e., "Coliform and, if possible, virus  concentrations  of
film and particulates will be enumerated."  After consultation with the
Project Officer, it was agreed that virus enumerations could not be carried
out without considerable cost and therefore would not be included.  Coliform
organism determinations were initiated immediately, however.

Subsequent to the awarding of this grant, the Southern California Coastal
Water Research Project (SCCWRP) requested that the sampling and analytical
techniques developed in the first year of this study be used in fairly
extensive ocean studies of surface conditions in the Southern  California
Bight.  This was well removed in distance from the sites envisaged originally
for the ocean studies and the costs were increased appreciably.  SCCWRP
offered compensation in terms of furnishing the sampling craft and supporting
the personnel needed for the ocean studies.  Three separate ocean surveys
were made in 1971 under this arrangement with the pertinent data being
presented and discussed in this report.  The ocean work of 1973 was conducted
without any aid from SCCWRP but the studies were continued in  the Southern
California Bight area to complement the results of the 1971 work.

The participation of SCCWRP made it possible to collect data in a region
of real concern to the public.  Even so, the Southern California Bight region
was not ideal for the development of new sampling and analytical tools
because the large primary effluents were always  submerged beneath
the ocean thermocltne during the ocean surveys and the region  was remote
from the sample processing laboratory.  A more orderly procedure would
have been the sampling of surfacing primary and secondary effluents first

                                     8

-------
to establish firmly cause and effect relationships.

Section IV of this report describes the character of the area sampled  in
the ocean surveys as well as the conditions encountered during each  survey.
General information on the techniques employed in each survey is  also  presented
in that section.  Sections V, VI, and VII deal almost exclusively with  the
three types of sampling techniques evaluated during  the study:  surface
trawling, nylon netting screens, and glass cloth screens.   Wastewater
effluent sampling of concern to each of those techniques is presented  at the
appropriate time.

-------
                      IV.  DESCRIPTION OF OCEAN SURVEYS

This study was conducted in the San Pedro Channel  and Santa Monica  Bay
regions of the Southern California Bight as  shown  in Figure 1.   Sampling
Stations 1 and 4 were located over the marine outfalls of the  Hyperion
Plant of the City of Los Angeles and the Joint Water Pollution  Control  Plants
(JWPCP) of the County of Los Angeles, respectively.   Station 2  was  located
3.7 km north of the Hyperion outfall and Station 5 west of the  Palos  Verdes
Peninsula at the latitude of the Marineland  of the Pacific. This station
will be called "Marineland" at times in this report  and it was  located
approximately 14 km northwest along the coast from the JWPCP outfalls.

Stations 3a and 3b were selected as control  areas.  They were  located at the
northern end of Santa Catalina Island and out of the main surface circula-
                  ,-»
tion pattern of Santa Monica Bay.  This region was approximately 44 km  south
of the Hyperion outfall and 33 km southwest  of the JWPCP outfalls.

Three field surveys were conducted in 1971.   The objectives of the  first two,
performed on April 7-8 and August 31-September 3,  were to evaluate  various
means of sampling the water surface for flotage, the identification of  sur-
face pollution, and the significance of sea  slicks in concentrating the flotage.
The third .survey of December 9 was for the purpose of tracing  the movement
of flotage on the sea surface.

The data procured from the 1971 surveys were analyzed and a fourth  survey
of the study area was made on July 11-13, 1973.  The major emphasis of  that
survey was placed on surface film sampling because the results  of the 1971
surveys were inadequate in some respects for this  type of sampling.

The two outfall systems sampled, JWPCP and Hyperion, had about equivalent
flows and contributed together about 71 percent of the total wastewater
flow released to the California Bight in 1971 [1].  The two other major
dischargers, Orange County and San Diego, were located many kilometers  south
of the study area.  The dimensions of the outfalls sampled are presented

                                    10

-------
                           118°30'W
o
 oo
 oo
                                      SANTA CATALINA

                                          ISLAND
                   Figure 1.  Study Area
                        n

-------
in Table 1 together with the average 1971  flows  and  effluent quality
characteristics.

The JWPCP outfall system was complicated,  consisting of three  separate
outfalls.  Most of the flow was released from either the 90 inch  (2.29 m)
or 120 inch (3.05 m) outfalls, with  the split between the  flows shown in
the table being an estimate.

The JWPCP effluent was a primary effluent  containing significant  portions
of industrial  wastewater [1].   Table 1 shows  that it was relatively strong
in terms of grease, BOD, and other routine measures  of wastewater quality.
The Hyperion effluent, on the other hand,  stemmed almost entirely from
domestic sources  and a portion of it received secondary treatment (activated
sludge).  Its  quality was better than that of a  normal  primary effluent,
reflecting its domestic nature and the influence of  the secondary treatment.

Commonly both  effluents were chlorinated during  periods of effluent plume
surfacing.  No chlorine was being added to the effluents during the surveys
of 1971, but it was being added to the JWPCP  effluent in July  1973.  All
effluent samples  collected at that facility were taken beyond  the chlori-
nation process.

EFFLUENT PLUME SUBMERGENCE

Of great practical significance is the depth  of  effluent plume submergence
occurring during the field surveys.   The depth of the effluent plumes were
not measured directly in this study but water temperature  and  salinity were
measured with  depth at all the stations occupied during the first two sur-
veys.  The results showed that most of the density structure resulted from
temperature variation and only the observed temperature and computed density
profiles are shown in Figures 2, 3,  4, and 5. Water temperatures only were
measured during the July 1973 survey with  the results being presented in
Figgpe 6.
                                    12

-------
U)
       104
       20
       30 4
     Q-
     LjJ
     Q
       40
       50
       60
Station 1
Station 2	9	
         April  7, 1971
          8    9   10   11   12   13  14   15   16
                       TEMPERATURE, °C
                                                                         Bottom at 73 meters
                                                                            Control Area
                                                                      Station 3a - 8 April 1971
                                       10   11   12   13   14  15   16   17
                                                     TEMPERATURE,  °C
                    Figure 2.  Temperature Profiles Observed at Sampling  Stations: April, 1971

-------
   10
   20 -I
   30 J
 "40-1
CL.
LLJ
O
   50
   60 H
   70 H
April 7, 1971
April 7, 1971
April 8, 1971
           Figure  3.   Water Density Profiles: April, 19?]
                           14

-------
                                     1  Meter  Observation  Interval
   0
  10-
  20-
 E30-l
a,
LU
Q
  40 -I
  50-
  60
                                     _L
             Station 1
                      Aug. 31, 1971
i    Station 2	Sept. 1, 1971
                   T
T
                            _L
                                                                             3b
                                                                Station 3b
                                                       Sept. 2, 1971
                                    Station 4	Sept. 3, 1971
                                                            Station 3b Bottom 100 meters
    11    12   13  14   15    16    17   18    19   20   11  12   13   14   15   16  17   18   19   20  21

                   TEMPERATURE,  °C                                   TEMPERATURE, °C


       Figure 4.  Temperature Profiles Observed at Sampling Stations: August-September, 1971

-------
10 J
20
30
40 H
50 J
60-^
70
        Station
    1
    2
    3b
    4
   Sampled
Aug. 31, 1971
Sept. 1, 1971
Sept. 2, 1971
Sept. 3, 1971
                    Sta.  1

                        Sta.  2

                                Sta.  4

Ocean
 Bottom
              Sta. 3b
                 X
                100 meters

   24
                   25
                                26
                                 (7.
    Figure 5.   Water Density Profiles:  August-September,  1971
                              16

-------
                    TEMPERATURE, UC

     11   12   13  14   15   16   17   18   19
                                     TEMPERATURE,  C
   10
   20
   30
Q_
LU
O
   40
   50
    60
                     CONTROL AREA
        Station  3b  (13 July
                      1973)
Bottom at 80 m
                    11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19
Station 4 (11  July  1973)-o— Bottom  at  54  m
Station 5 (12  July  19 73}-»—Bottom  at  63  m
                Figure 6.  Temperature Profiles Observed at Sampling Stations:  July  1973

-------
              Table  1  .  CHARACTERISTICS OF OUTFALLS SAMPLED

Outfall
Diameter, m
Length, m
Diffuser
Length, m
Shape
Av. depth, m
No. of ports
Effluent (av. for 1971 )a
Flow, m3/s
HEM, mg/a
BOD5, mg/a
SS, mg/a
VSS, mg/a
Hyperion
144"
3.66
8000
2414
Y
59
168
14. 7b
19
120
73
55
JWPCP
90" .
2.29
2600
732
Y
63
100
5.26C
outfalls
120"
3.05
3600
1353
L
56
740
11. Oc
70
320
330
210
           Data  from Ref.
           4.4 m3/s of secondary effluent mixed with 10.3 m3/s of primary
           effluent.
          cPrimary effluent split between two outfalls,  Flows in each
           estimated.
The figures show that extensive ocean stratification existed  during  those
surveys with the overall change in  temperature  being at  a minimum during
the April 1971  survey.   With  respect to the outfall stations,  the vertical
profiles were always  measured in the Y of the Hyperion outfall diffuser.
At the JWPCP outfalls  the profile was measured  at the seaward  end of the
L shaped diffuser in  the summer of  1971, and also in the July  1973 survey.
Only a few discrete water samples were collected for salinity  measurements
in the summer survey  of 1971, so the density structure shown  in  Figure  5
is only approximate except at the data points shown.  A  density  structure
was estimated for the July 1973 survey using the salinity pattern observed
in August-September 1971.
The daily flows existing in the outfalls during the various survey periods
are shown in Table 2.  Again the split of flow  between the  90  and 120 inch
                                    18

-------
            Table 2 .  CALCULATED PLUME  SUBMERGENCE  AND DILUTION
                           OVER MARINE OUTFALLS
Outfall
Hype ri on
JWPCP
90"
120"
Date
IV-7-71
VIII-31-71

IX- 3-71
VII-11-73
IX-3-71
VII-11-73
Daily
flow
itiVs
14.9
15.2

5.4
5.1
11.3
10.6
Plume
submergence
m
12
21

33
17
33
15
Initial
dilution
100
90

100
(a)
70
(a)
             No submarine currents measured.
outfalls of the JWPCP facility was estimated.  Using these data plus  the
density gradients measured or estimated at each outfall, the rise of  the
effluent plumes above the diffusers was  estimated using the methods  of
Brooks [2].  In the case of the two older Y shaped diffusers it appeared
that the jets derived from the rather widely spaced ports would rise  more
or less independently without much overlap, but the jets from the L shaped
diffuser would soon overlap giving continuous curtains of rise.  The  results
of these computations in terms of plume submergence are presented in  Table  2.

Initial dilutions over the outfalls were also estimated using the methods
of Brooks [2] as well as the continuity equation in those cases where the
currents had been measured with depth.  In general the continuity approach
yielded the lesser initial dilution values and those estimates are presented
in Table 2 along with the estimates of plume submergence.  The current data
utilized for this purpose are tabulated in Tables 1 and 2 of Appendix A.

The results shown in Table 2 indicate a minimum plume submergence over the
Hyperion outfall on April 7, 1971; being at a depth of only 12 m or so.
Maximum submergences of 20 m or greater may have occurred in the summer
survey of 1971.  The plume submergences computed for the July 1973 survey
                                    19

-------
appeared to be less than those obtained for the summer 1971  survey  but the
latter computations have to be considered as being very approximate.

In most cases the initial dilution may have been nearly 100-fold over the
outfalls, checking with some of the observations of water quality made in
the Southern California Coastal Water Research Program Study [1].

The significant finding of all this is that the wastewater effluent plumes
were submerged beneath the pycnocline during the times when flotage was
collected from the ocean surface.   A minimum submergence of 12 m may have
existed in the Hyperion area in April 1971.  These computations check well
with visual observations of the sea surface made during the ocean surveys
as discussed below.

SURFACE CONDITIONS DURING SURVEYS

The success of a program of ocean  surface sampling is  dependent on  the weather
conditions encountered.  By far the most significant influence is the wind.
A strong wind will disrupt and disperse sea slicks quickly and eventually
submerge even fairly large floating particulates.  A light breeze 1s  not detri-
mental in some respects but the sea slicks become invisible quickly either
because the wind is insufficient to ripple areas not covered by a surface
film, or because the film itself has an opportunity to form across  the
entire surface.  Sea swell makes accurate surface sampling more difficult
but it has little effect on the sea slicks.  The effects of water density
stratification and internal waves  on sea slick visibility remains to be
ascertained.  Because the wind plays a significant role in surface  sampling
a detailed description of the wind conditions encountered during each survey
is given below.

April, 1971

The best wind conditions were encountered in the very  first survey  of April
7-8, 1971.  Numerous well-defined  slicks were observed despite an appreciable
sea swell.  A 10 knot (5 m/s) wind did break up the slicks in the afternoon
of April 7.

                                     20

-------
The most outstanding feature of the first survey was  a  large  standing slick
outlining the Hyperion diffuser on the morning of  April  7  as  shown  in
Figure 7.  This slick was never observed subsequently.   Other types of
sea slicks were also observed in the area including a broad meandering slick
directed more or less downcurrent from the diffuser and  narrow band slicks
running parallel to the coast at Station 2, 3.7 km north of the outfall
diffuser.  The slicks at Station 3a in the control area  consisted of a large
ill-defined slick lying in the lee of Santa Catalina  Island and several band
slicks as shown in Figure 8.  The wind speed was ideal at  2-3 knots (1 to
1.5 m/s).

August-September. 1971

The wind was not particularly favorable for surface sampling  during the
summer cruise of 1971 and the sea slicks commonly  were rather poorly defined.
No wind existed in the Hyperion outfall region on  the morning  of August 31
and the slicks were nearly invisible.  There was the  hint  of  a series of
band slicks moving across the diffuser in the shoreward  direction, however,
and these were sampled and called "slick samples."  A strong  southwest wind
rose in the afternoon destroying any slick patterns which  might have existed
in the area.

Conditions were better in the early morning hours  of  September 1 and well-
defined band slicks were observed 3.7 km north of  the Hyperion outfall as
shown in Figure 9.  An east wind of 5 to 7 knots (2.5 to 3.5 m/s) existed
at the time but this soon disappeared and the slicks  became nearly invisible.
At times the wind would gust briefly and a slick pattern would appear again.
At noon the wind veered to the southwest and increased to  11  knots (5.7 m/s)
and the surface was broken up entirely into downwind  mixing cells.

The results of the first survey conducted in the control area  on April 8,
1971 indicated that the surface may have been polluted slightly at Station
3a.  The windward side of Santa Catalina Island was then selected as the
                                    21

-------
f\>
ro
        Nautical Mile
                               n8°30'
                                               lT
                          O~  i   April 7 p.m.
                                  Sea Swell
                                  W 2-3 ft, 4 sec
                                  Wind SW (a 4-10
                           N Apparent Slic
                          v Movement
                            1,000/nr
                                            Sludge
              Station
                 1   /•
                        S\ Drogue
                        V \ Recovery
                           0.33 k
x     April  7  a.m.
yC   Swell  NW 2-4  ft
' *   4 sec
      Wind Light  and Variable
                                                                                       ^1-,Hyperion
                                                                                        "   Sewage
                                                                                          ' Treatment Plant
                Figure 7.  Surface Conditions in Hyperion Outfall Region: April 7, 1971

-------
    2 September 1971
            X
ro
       Swell
       NW 1.5'
         4 sec
                   Slicks  not to scale
     50

100 Fath-dfflS_
              Figure 8.  Surface Conditions in Control Areas: April 4 and September 2, 1971

-------
         Nautical Mile
6
                      \
                Wind SW 11 k
                   i   1330
           Station/
              2 a
                          118030'
     Slicks
      0700
X              Swell NW 1.5 ft,
              5 sec
              Wind E 0.5 k
           Sludge  Outfall

              Slick
             Station
                1
                                Swell  NW  2
                                           >gue Drift
                                           0.34 k
                                  ft,  4 sec
                                  Aug. 31, 1971
                                  Wind L & V
••M Hyperion
  ;Sewage
  ^Treatment
    ,.  Plant
                                      Drogue Drift
                                      0.38 k
                                      Sept. 1, 1971
                                      Wind E 3 k
Figure 9.  Surface Conditions in Hyperion Outfall  Region:  August 31  and September 1,  1971

-------
control area and designated as Station 3b as shown in Figure 8,  A steady
2.5 m/s east wind was favorable for sea slick visibility and a number of
narrow we11-defined slick bands were observed in the area.

The JWPCP outfalls were sampled on the morning of September 3, 1971 as shown
in Figure 10.  The wind averaged only about 7 knots (3.6 m/s) from the east
during that time but no sea slicks were visible.  The best that could be
done was to allow the sampling craft to drift over the 90 inch Y diffuser while
collecting film samples

December, 1971

A slick tracing study was conducted on December 9, 1971  as shown in Figure
11.  A steady southwest wind in excess of 7 knots (3.6 m/s) persisted until
mid-afternoon when it gradually decreased to a light air by sunset.  No
slicks were apparent anywhere along the coast until the wind began to decrease.
A series of sharply-defined band slicks then appeared in the region where
the sampling craft happened to be cruising at the time.   Those slicks, shown
in Figure 11, ran parallel to the coast and increased in width as the wind
dropped until by sunset it appeared as if the entire surface was covered
by a single slick.

July, 1973

Wind conditions were never very ideal during the July 1973 survey.   The
weather had been unsettled for weeks prior to the cruise, following a general
pattern of strong winds in the afternoon and evening and mild winds in the
early morning hours.  The slicks themselves were always  poorly defined and
seemingly on the verge of disappearing.

The wind was calm over the JWPCP outfalls in the early morning hours  of
July 11, 1973 and no slick patterns were visible.  Indeed, it appeared that
the entire surface was one large slick.  A 2 to 3 knot (1 to 1.5 m/s) west
wind sprung up quickly after 8 a.m. and poorly defined patterns of broad,
diffuse band slicks formed as shown in Figure 12.  The majority ran normal

                                     25

-------
ro
en
                                                                              San   Pedro
                                                                                    Bay
                          SAN     PEDRO    CHANNEL

                                            Nons1i ck
                                             Samples
               Figure  10.   Surface  Conditions  Over JWPCP  Outfalls:  September 3,  1971

-------
ro
                                                                  Manhattan
                                                                     Beach
                                                                           Hermosa
                                                                            Beach
                      Figure 11.   Transport of Flotage  Study:  December 9,  1971

-------
PO
00
          SWELL W
          1 FT 4 SEC
          Nautical  Miles
         I
        0
I        I
                   Figure 12.
                                                                                      33°45'  N
                                                                                SAN  PEDRO
                                                                                    BAY
                                      250 FATHOMS
              Surface Conditions Over JWPCP Outfalls: July 11, 1973

-------
to the coast but some paralleled the coast, suggesting two independent slick
patterns with one moving across the other.  The wind increased to 7 knots
(3.5 m/s) by noon and the slick patterns disappeared.

On the following day an easterly morning wind was much too strong to permit
sea slick formation in the JWPCP outfalls area, but the land mass of the
Palos VerdesPeninsula sheltered the waters lying to the west of the
peninsula and a series of band slicks were found at the Marineland station
shown in Figure 13.  The wind in this region was from the east, approximately
steady at 6 to 7 knots (3 to 3.5 m/s), and the slicks were broad and ill-
defined, with some running normal and others parallel to the coast.  By
noon the slicks had been broken up and dispersed by the easterly wind.

A break in the wind pattern occurred on July 13, 1973 when unsteady westerly
winds dropped from an average of about 6 knots (3.m/s) in the early morning
hours to 4 knots ( 2 m/s) by noon.  A series of  band slicks were
observed in the control area northwest of Santa Catalina Island (Station
3b) as shown in Figure 14.  No interfering slick band patterns were observed
and the slicks tended to run normal to the coast.

Photographs of the sea slicks observed in the summer 1971 and July 1973
surveys are shown in Figure 15 for the areas over the Hyperion and JWPCP
outfalls.  Unfortunately, photographs were not taken of the large standing
slick found over the Hyperion outfall on April  7, 1971.  (see page 117)

DISCUSSION

Very little information exists in the literature concerning the mode of
formation or significance of wastewater sea slicks.  One recent paper by
Newton [3] describes the prevalence of sewage slicks in an estuary and  some
attempts we re made to procure a mass balance on amounts of fats released
and the extent of the resulting surface sewage films.  Unfortunately, there
exists orders of magnitude differences between that study and this, where
the grease content of the effluents were grossly less and the effluent
plumes remained submerged beneath the ocean thermocline,

                                    29

-------
Figure 13.
                           WIND  WEST
                           AT 6  K
Surface Conditions Off Marineland:  July 12,  1973
 (Note:  Figure is only approximate)

-------
                                                             118U30' W
 SMELL NW
1.5 ft 4 sec
                                     SANTA

                                   C A T A L  I N A

                                        ISLAND
            Figure 14.   Surface  Conditions  in Control Area: July 13, 1973

-------
A review of the state of visibility of the sea slicks and wind speeds  recorded
in this study indicates that the slicks became invisible when the wind was  less
than approximately 1/2 to 1 m/s.  Speeds in excess of 5 to 6 m/s  quickly
destroyed the slick patterns and formed surface mixing cells in accord with
the concepts of Langmuir [4].

The wind seldom permitted the sea surface in the Southern California Bight
to attain any state of equilibrium.  Strong winds mixed the surface  flotage
with the upper ocean layer, and once they ceased the flotage reformed.  Winds
with speeds of 3 to 4 m/s may not disrupt a slick pattern quickly but  if
given sufficient time the evidence indicates that the slicks will  eventually
disappear.  Finally, a non-surfacing wastewater plume may form a  sea slick
if the thermocline is located sufficiently close to the ocean surface
(approximately 12 m for an outfall releasing 6.2 a/s of effluent  per meter
of outfall diffuser length).
                                     33

-------
                         V.   TRAWLED PARTICULATES

Floating particulates greater than 0.5 mm in size were collected by straining
an ocean surface layer approximately 3 cm deep and 0.87 m wide through a
500 ]i pore size nylon screen fastened behind a trawling device.  The charac-
teristics and dimensions of the trawl used in this study are shown in Figure
16.

The trawl was towed alongside the sampling craft at approximately 0.8 m/s
(1.5 knots).  At the termination of a trawl the screen was removed from the
plastic cod and stored in a petri dish under refrigeration until ready for
analysis.  The types of analyses conducted on the particulates varied from
survey  to survey but included at times, 1) type, size, and number of parti-
culates captured; 2) total dry weight; 3) hexane extractable materials
(HEM) and the composition of the HEM in terms of fatty acids (FA), pesticides,
and polychlorinated biphenols (PCB); and 4) coliform bacteria.

The type, size, and number of particulates were determined visually under-
neath a dissecting microscope.  The HEM were obtained by extraction with
hexane  in a soxhlet apparatus and the fatty acids by reacting the hexane
extracts with a-bromo-2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorotoluene (BFT) to form fatty
acid esters.  The esters were then determined quantitatively by techniques
of gas-liquid chromatography.  The PCB and some pesticide compounds were
first separated from the HEM with the aid of an activated silica column,
then measured quantitatively in a gas-liquid chromatograph.  The details
of these chemical methods of analyses are presented in Appendix B.

Unfortunately it was not possible to measure the coliform bacteria in a
trawl sample without destroying the sample.  Such samples were first
homogenized in a blender and then filtered through membrane filters in
accord with the techniques described in Standard Methods [5].  For this
peason the coliform samples had to be collected and analyzed independently
of all the other analyses.
                                    34

-------
CO
en
          8 1/2
                                                                                          Tow Line
Screen Sampler

500^1. pore Size

         Canvas

                                                               Profile  View
                                FIGURE 16.   TRAWL  NET SAMPLER

-------
DESCRIPTION OF TRAWLS

The extent of each trawl is listed in Tables 3 and 4.  Conditions  at the
time of trawling are described briefly below.
April. 1971
All trawling at the Hyperion outfall was performed within  the  standing
slick shown in Figure 7.  The trawling at Station 2,  3.7 km  to the north,
was undertaken during a period of increasing wind.  The slicks were destroyed
at that site before the final two trawls could be made.  In  the control
area  (Station 3a) all the trawls except the last were made in  the  large
slick lying in the lee of Santa Catalina Island.
August-September, 1971
In this survey the trawls were duplicated as much as  possible  at a given
site with  one being taken for coliform bacteria analysis and the other for
all the remaining analyses deemed necessary.

The trawling over the Hyperion outfall was commenced  in the  afternoon when
the wind was relatively strong.  The sea slicks, ill-defined at best, were
destroyed  as the trawling progressed.  The trawls were conducted progressively
eastward commencing over the center of the Y diffuser and ending 700 m to
the east.  The data shown in Tables 3 and 4 are listed in  that order.  At
Station 2, 3.7 km to the north, trawling was conducted during  a period of
relative calm.

No slicks were observed over the JWPCP outfalls during the 1971  survey.  The
order of trawling, as listed in Tables 3 and 4, was progressively  westward
commencing near the seaward end of the L diffuser (see Figure  10).   Three
of the four pairs of trawls were taken parallel with  the L diffuser and the
last west of the Y diffuser.  Trawls in the control area (Station  3b) were
made during a period of well-defined sea slicks.
July, 1973
No trawls were collected for coliform bacteria analysis during this  survey.
All trawling was conducted in the morning when some rather ill-defined slicks
                                    36

-------
                                           Table  3-  SUMMARY OF SURFACE TRAWLS
                                       One m2 of Trawl Equals 30 £ of Strained Water

Location


Hyperion
outfall




JWPCP
outfalls





Hyperion,
3.7 km N



Sta.
No.


1












9




Date

IV-7-71


VIII-31-71


IX-3-71



VII-11-73


IV-7-71


IX-1-71


No.

3


4


4



4


3


4

Trawls
Area
m2
116
268
163
70
74
73
62
35
118
101
108

245
318
231
276
304
320
320
110
159
148
68
% in
Slicks
100
100
100
30
30
0
0
none
none
none
none

100
20
20
20
48
none
none
100
23
100
43
Counts
No./m2
5.2
3.4
18
0.37
0.78
1.2
1.4
0.80
0.75
3.4
9.0




0.93
0.55
0.30
0.88
0.36
1.5
1.6
V
h
Sewage
Type
92
82
89
78
94
82
93
46
41
85
91




61
49
37
56
83
73
99

Dry
Wt.
mg/m2
12
5.7
44
0.15
0.95
2.4
25.3
0.46
4.7
36
9.0

24
51
26
6.6
1.4
1.0
0.13
0.94
0.38
2.6
1.7

HEM
mg/m2

2.8
24
0.06
0.39
0.91
6.6
0.15
0.15
2.8
4.4

12
32.5
9.0
1.7
0.89
0.11
0.021
0.15
0.10
0.07
0.31
Fatty Acids
mg/m2



0.001
0.27
0.22
0.80
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.66

1.1
2.8
1.1
0.10



0.05
0.01
0.01
%
Cl6



36
22
27
26
32
29
31
16

21
34
25
27



64
31
42
%
C18



42
73
67
52
53
61
39
79

76
61
68
67



31
61
44

Aesthe-
tic
Rating9

3






2


2.3
1.5







CO

-------
                                     Table 3  (continued).   SUMMARY OF SURFACE TRAWLS



Location

JWPCP,
14 km NW




Control Areas,
Santa
Catalina Is.






Sta.
No.

5


3a


3b


3b




Date

VII-12-73


IV-8-71


IX-2-71


VII-13-73

Trawls


No.

4


4


4


4


Area
m2
162
213
170
263
200
200
106
526
391
314
229
242
161
187
220
263

% in
Slicks
N.R.
N.R.
25
25
100
100
100
6
60
40
100
50
N.R.
10
10
N.R.
Counts


No./m2



0.20
0.96
0.22
0.13
0.054
0.070
0.13
0.10



%
Sewage
Type



5
10
18
1.5
26
14
3
4




Dry
Wt.
mg/m2
0.36
0.29
0.22
0.50
3.6
8.5
0.13
0.024
0.25
0.59
3.3
0.44
6.0
2.3
1.4
0.033


HEM
yg/m2
27
38
16
54
24
73
22
8
0.1
3
1160
0.6
3.4
4.6
0.4
1.0
Fatty Acids


yg/m2
0.36
4.6
2.7
1.1



0.009
0.078
2.0

0.43
0.72
0.068
0.087

01
h
Cl6
58
47
47
38



67
40
100

48
46
62
47

%
C18
34
48
46
54



33
36
0

40
36
27
34

Aesthe-
tic
Rating


1.0







0

CO
CO
              Note:   N.R. means  not  recorded.
            Average of judgments  of aesthetic appearance made  by  the  sampling  crews.   The  higher the  rating
     number, the poorer the appearance (see Table 7).

-------
        Table  4 .   SUMMARY OF SURFACE TRAWLS - COLI FORM BACTERIA
               One  m2 of Trawl Equals  30  a of Strained Water


Location

Hyperi on
outfall


JWPCP
outfalls


Hyperion,
3.7 km N


Control areas ,
Santa Cata-
lina Is.


Sta.
No.

1


4


2

3a


3b



Date
IV- 7-71
VIII-31-71


IX-3-71

IV-7-71
IX-1-71

IV-8-71


IX-2-71

Trawls

No.
1
4


4

1
4

1


4

Area
m2
26.6
161
161
74
49
70
105
95
195
114
129
252
160
184
232

533
304
242
350
% in
slicks
100
30
30
0
0
none
none
none
none
22
100
none
100
35
100

30
40
100
50
Col i form Bacteria

No./m2
150,000
1,400
2,500
6,700
3,000
1 30 ,000
43,000
74,000
41 ,000
6,450
19,000
260
11,000
1,300
none

none
none
none
none

No./lOO ma
500
5
8
22
10
430
140
247
137
22
63
1
37
4





were visible.  The first trawl listed in Table 3 for the JWPCP outfalls
station was taken 400 m north of the seaward end of the L diffuser, the
second parallel to the L diffuser, and the remaining two over the Y diffuser.
Trawls taken at the remaining two sampling stations were always made normal
to the band slicks visible at the time.

RESULTS OF SURVEYS

Visual Typing
Tables 3 through 5 of Appendix A give the numbers of each type of particulate
captured in the trawls made in 1971.  Some types seemed likely to be of
                                    39

-------
wastewater origin; consequently, they were called "sewage types."  Included
in this category were such objects as pieces of grease and wax, plastic,
fiber, rubber, wood, seeds (several kinds), and unidentifiable tissue and
debris.  The grease and wax particulates were always predominant, and the
seeds and plastic were usually prevalent.

Other types of particulates were obviously of natural origin.  Pieces of
kelp and tar were the most prevalent in this category.  In some samples the
kelp predominated over all the other types of particulates.

The particulates captured in the August-September survey of 1971 were measured
with the aid of a dissecting microscope and the size distributions of the
more, prevalent types were determined.  The mean sizes of each type showed
some tendency to vary from location to location but the trends were not
pronounced except in the case of the kelp.  Consequently, all of the size
data except kelp were lumped together without regard to sampling location,
with the results shown in Table 5 and Figure 17.

Two types of size distributions were obtained; log-normal and uniform.  The
sizes of the grease and wax particulates, the tar, and the kelp were distri-
buted log-normally; implying a process of natural erosion [6].  The seeds
and pieces of plastic were more or less uniform in size although an occasional
large piece of plastic was recovered.

The side netting and collector screen used in the surface trawl had a pore
size of 0.5 mm; consequently, it might be expected that objects less than
0.5 mm would not be captured.  Generally this proved to be the case but
Figure 17 shows that 15% of the grease and wax particulates captured had
sizes equal to or less than 0.5 mm.  Some of these particulates were very
sticky,  and they tended to adhere to everything in sight.   They
seemed to favor the kelp, and in some instances the kelp had grown partially
or even completely around the grease.  This proves that their association
did not always result from the sampling method utilized, and that those
particulates had persisted for some time in the environment.   It also
                                    40

-------
             Table  5  .   CONCENTRATION  AND  SIZES  OF  PREVALENT TRAWLED  PARTICULATES
                                      (no./TOO m2 trawled)

Particulate
type
Sewage types
Grease & wax
Seeds
Plastic
Other
Natural
Tar
Kelp
Hyperion outfall
IV-7-71

573
85
4.4
54

32
22
VII-31-71

60
7.4
4.7
9

4.0
0.3
JWPCP
outfalls
IX-3-71

234
11
88
9

13
23
Hyperion,
3.7 km N
IV-7-71

16
7.0
0.3
8.4

1.7
1.7
IX-1-71

52
20
1.0
4

3.5
16
Control areas
IV-8-71

0.48
0.29
0.10
1.8

1.8
14
IX-2-71

<0.08
0.08
0.25
0.53

0.84
0.51
(Summer, 1971 only)
Particulate size
Median Mean Max.
mm mm mm

1.0 1.3 10
(All 2 to 3 mm)
(Most 2 to 5 mm)50


1.5 1.9 35
2.5a 4.0a 150a
7.5b 16b 150b
aAt Hyperion, 3.7 km N for IX-1-71.

bAt JWPCP outfalls.
°The mean is the arithmetic mean.

-------
              10
-£»
ro
               5
           M
               1    —
               0.5  —
              0.3
                        5    10     20   30  40  50  60   70  80     90    95

                                         PERCENT EQUAL  TO OR LESS THAN
99
99.8
            Figure 17.  Cumulative Frequency Distribution of Grease and  Wax,  and Tar  Particulates:
                        August-September,  1971.

-------
indicates that the growth of the kelp was not particularly hindered by the
adhering grease.

Graphs like Figure 17 have to be interpreted with  care.  It might be assumed
that the tar pieces were generally larger than the grease and wax parti-
culates on the ocean surface.  This may not have been the case because the
small tar pieces may have slipped through the trawl screens without diffi-
culty whereas the grease and wax particulates tended to stick to the apparatus
or other debris, as described above.  If 15% of the tar pieces equal to or
smaller than 0.5 mm in size had stayed in the collector the two size distri-
butions would have been identical.

In summary, Table 5 shows clearly that the grease and wax particulates
captured in the 1971 surveys were predominant in the samples collected over
the outfalls-and north of the Hyperion outfall.  Natural types such as tar
and kelp dominated the samples taken in the control areas.  The table also
shows that the mean size of the grease and wax particulates captured in the
summer survey of 1971 was 1.3 mm, and that the largest particulate had a
length of 10 mm.  Most of the plastic pieces ranged from 2 to 5 mm in size
but pieces up to 50 mm in length were taken on occasion.

Dry Weight. HEM, and Fatty Acids

Table 3 summarizes the results of these analyses.  The fatty acid analysis
was not conducted on the particulates collected in the first survey of
1971, and the degree of unsaturation was not determined until 1973.  The
significance of these analyses will be discussed in detail subsequently.

PCB and Pesticides

A few samples collected in the August-September 1971 survey were analyzed
for PCB and pesticides.  Aroclor 1254 was detected in one sample collected
over the Hyperion outfall, but it amounted to only 0.13% of the HEM found
in that sample.  PCB was not detected in any of the ibther samples tested
and it had to amount to less than 0.10% of the HEM in any of them since
                                   43

-------
that was the limit of detectability for PCB at that time.   These fractions
were disproportionately small  in comparison to those found in  the ocean
film materials and the analysis was not pursued further.   Pesticides,  if
present, also were minute.  These tests were not conducted on  the non-
extractable particulates such  as plastic.

PROOF OF WASTEWATER DERIVATION OF PARTICULATES

Proof that some of the trawled particulates were derived  from  wastewater
discharges is as follows:
1.  The particulates could be  seen rising  to the ocean surface within  the
    vicinity of the marine outfalls.  Photographic evidence is presented
    in Figure 18.  (See page 119)
2.  Coliform bacteria were found in the particulates collected over and
    near the outfalls, but not in the control area.
3.  Figure 19 shows that the fatty acid compositions of the particulates
    collected over the JWPCP outfalls on July 11, 1973 and those screened
    from the JWPCP wastewater effluent on  July 13, 1973 were nearly identical;
    whereas the acid compositions in the Marineland and control areas  were
    grossly different.  For example, the proportion of unsaturated C18
    acids decreased from approximately 60% in the effluent particulates
    to 25% or less in the control area particulates, and  the proportion
    of C16 acids increased from approximately 30% in the  effluent particulates
    to 65% in the control area.  (See page 119)

Table 6 presents data pertinent to Figure  19.  It shows that the average
concentration of HEM strained from the JWPCP effluent on  July  13, 1973 was
0.65 mg/&.  Both the HEM and the total fatty acid concentrations decreased
about 5000 times from the outfall area to  the control area.  Not all this
decrease may be ascribed to the wastewater discharges because  the natural
background may have been higher close to the mainland.

The fatty acid composition of the HEM was  also determined in the samples
collected in the August-September survey of 1971 but the  degree of
                                    44

-------
                                  Table 6
                         EXPLANATION OF FIGURE 19
               FATTY ACID COMPOSITION OF LARGE PARTICULATES
Bar
no.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Location
Strained
JWPCP
effluent
Over JWPCP
outfalls
14 km NW
of JWPCP
outfalls
Control
Date
VII-13-73
VII-11-73
VII-12-73
VII-13-73
No. of
observations
5
4
4
4
HEM
0.65
mg/Jl
15
mg/m2
36
yg/m2
2.1
yg/m2
FA
0.12
mg/A
1.3
mg/m2
2.2
yg/m2
0.29
yg/m2
% FA
18
9
6
14
unsaturation was not determined.  Otherwise, those results were nearly
identical in all respects to those presented and discussed above.

MEASUREMENT OF SURFACE POLLUTION

Several different analyses were used in this study to evaluate the surface
flotage.  The best means of measuring these particulates derived from
wastewater effluents is discussed below.

Visual Typing

The grease and wax particulates correlated fairly well with other non-
extractable "sewage types" as shown in Figure 20.  The rapid drop off in
grease and wax particulates with low concentrations of the other types
indicates that either the grease and wax particulates did not spread as  far
as the other types, or the other types had sources other than wastewater
discharges.  The figure indicates a natural background of non-extractable
"sewage types" in the order of one particulate every  100 to 1000 m2.
                                    1*5

-------
                OVER OUTFALLS
                AWAY FROM OUTFALLS
                CONTROL AREAS
   10
                  ID"3          ID'2        TO-1         1          10
                     OTHER "SEWAGE TYPES"  OF  PARTICULATES, no/m2
Figure 20.   Comparison  of Grease  and  Wax  Participates with Non-Extractable Sewage Types

-------
From this it was deduced that most of the particulates classed as sewage
types correlated well  with each other.  Because the concentrations of these
types were much higher over the outfalls than elsewhere (see Table 5) it
may be safely assumed that most of them were derived from the wastewater
discharges.

Hexane Extractable Materials (HEM)

The HEM of the samples correlated closely with the numbers of grease and
wax particulates found in the samples in all cases where tar was not excessive
as shown in Figure 21.  At first glance this is surprising but the size
distribution of the grease and wax particulates did not vary significantly
from  location to location, .and if most of the HEM were derived from those
particulates then the correlation should be good.

Figure 21 also shows a 1 to 1 correspondence between the number of parti-
culates and the mg of HEM.  This would arise only if most of the grease and
wax particulates dissolved into the hexane as explained below:

          Table 5 shows that the mean size of the grease and wax particu-
    lates was 1.3 mm.   Their mean volume, therefore, must have been on the
    order of 1 x 10~3 nu and with a specific gravity close to one their
    mean weight must have been on the order of one mg per particulate.
    Consequently, a 1  to 1 ratio would be obtained only if most of the
    grease and wax was dissolved by the hexane.

The significance of Figures 20 and 21 should not be overlooked.  They show
that most of the grease and wax was probably derived from the wastewater
discharges, that most of the HEM was derived from the grease and wax parti-
culates (exclusive of tar), and that most of the grease and wax dissolved
into the hexane and that there is possibly a background threshold of non-
extractable particulates classified as "sewage types."  The HEM is, of
course, relatively easily determined in a soxhlet apparatus.
                                    48

-------
ID
                           ID-2        10-1        1



                           HEXANE EXTRACTABLES, mg/m2



         Figure 21.  Comparison of Grease and Wax Partlculates  With HEM

-------
Fatty Acids (FA)
The fatty acids (C12-C22) were determined directly on the HEM without
acidification or saponification.  Only free fatty acids could be determined
in this manner.

It was believed that acidification, which is not easily accomplished with
soxhlet extraction, would not increase the yield of HEM appreciably because
the grease and wax particulates appeared to extract readily as discussed
previously and because little residue was left over in the soxhlet thimble.
Saponifi cation increased the yield of the fatty acids considerably when
an experiment was conducted on one trawl sample collected over the JWPCP
outfalls in July 1973.  The results indicated that 12% of the HEM was composed
of free fatty acids and 18% of fats.  The saponifi able fatty acids contained
large fractions of saturated C16 and C15 acids while those extracted directly
were preponderantly unsaturated C18 acids (see Figure 19).  Carbon, hydrogen,
oxygen analyses indicated that 38% of the remaining HEM was simply bound
water, 21% alkanes (paraffins) and 10% unidentified long chain organic
compounds.  Thus, the visual description was apt, the sewage particulates
were composed primarily of grease and wax.

Figure 22 shows that the total weight of the unsaponified fatty acids com-
prised about 10% of the HEM on the average.  This proportion varied rather
grossly at times but no trend was evidenced with distance from the outfalls.
Thus, the FA analysis could be used as well as the HEM to measure the grease
and wax particulates but the results would be considerably less reliable.

The composition of the fatty acids altered considerably with distance from
the outfalls as shown in Figure 19.  The proportion of C16 acids increased
at the expense of the C18 acids, but the proportion of saturated free stearic
acid remained approximately constant at 10 to 20%.
                                    50

-------
               O OVER OUTFALLS
               X AWAY FROM OUTFALLS
               n CONTROL AREAS
TO"5
                           TO'2         10-1          1
                           HEXANE  EXTRACTABLES, mg/m2
                    Figure  22.   Fatty  Acid  Proportion  of  HEM
                                     51

-------
Coliform Bacteria
This method of analysis is easily performed and it can be used to ascertain
the origins of at least a portion of the flotage.  It is sensitive but not
precise.  For this reason it does not provide an adequate means for computing
mass balances on wastewater flotage.

Dry Weight
The State of California Water Quality Plan for Ocean Waters [7] places
restrictions on the dry weight of wastewater flotage which can be found
over a marine outfall.  Such limits are necessary to control non-extractable
flotage of wastewater origin such as rubber or plastic.  In this study the
grease and wax particulates always predominated, so it is not known what
the safe limits on such objects might be, aesthetic or otherwise.

The total dry weight of all the particulates gave a poor correlation with
HEM as shown in Figure 23.  This might be expected because the samples
contained varying amounts of non-extractables, some natural and some of
wastewater origins.  The types of parti culates classed as "sewage types"
were not separated and weighed independently in this study.  Such a task would
have been difficult because some of the grease particulates were extremely
sticky.  It appears that if this had been done a good correlation with HEM
would have been obtained because the grease and wax particulates correlated
well with other sewage types as well as the HEM.  This would be an extremely
onerous task and is not advised in normal circumstances.

Figure 23 also shows that commonly nearly half of the total dry weight of the
flotage collected over the outfalls could be extracted, whereas this proportion
became very small and erratic in the control regions.

Recommendations
These studies indicate that HEM is by far the best analysis for ascertaining
the extent of surface pollution created by floating particulates having sizes
greater than 0.5 mm.  The source of the HEM can be checked by the following
                                    52

-------
en
co
                                                                O  OVER OUTFALLS

                                                                X  AWAY FROM OUTFALLS
                 10 3
                                            ID'2        10-1         1

                                            HEXANE EXTRACTABLES, mg/m2
                                Figure 23.  Comparison of Total Dry Weight With HEM

-------
additional analyses; visual  identification, fatty acid composition,  and
coliform bacteria.  In the case where non-extractable wastewater particu-
lates are preponderant, a dry weight analysis might prove to be of greater
benefit.

SIGNIFICANCE OF SURFACE POLLUTION

It has been demonstrated that particulates can reach the ocean surface through
a well defined ocean density structure.  The significance of this type of
pollution is now evaluated in terms of HEM, the parameter believed to be
of greatest value in its control.

Aesthetic Impact

In the July 1973 survey it was possible to evaluate the aesthetic impact of
the particulates with a team of 6 to 7 observers composed of sampling personnel
and the ship's crew.  (Prior to this time the number of sampling personnel
was too small to make very valid assessments of aesthetic impact.)  A rating
sheet of the type shown in Figure 24 was used and the average response was
determined from a scale ranging from 0 to 3 points, with the points  increas-
ing as the surface appearance deteriorated.  The results are summarized in
Table 3.

It is difficult to relate surface appearance with any quantitative measure
such as HEM because the particulates seemed more objectionable when gathered
in a slick than when free, and any surface trawl tends to strike an average
through zones of both high and low particulate concentration.  Even so, the
aesthetic evaluations tended to correlate with the HEM as shown in Table 7.

Remembering that 1 mg/m2 of HEM was approximately equivalent to 1 grease
and wax particulate/m2, it is apparent that a relatively high HEM concen-
tration is necessary before the surface becomes aesthetically offensive.
It may be appropriate to maintain an HEM concentration of less than 3 mg/m2
to be on the safe side at all times, however.
                                    54

-------
                                                 No.:
                                                 Date:
                                                 Time:
                     OCEAN  SURFACE AESTHETIC SURVEY
 Location:
 Categories:   check  one
 0.   No  pollution  -  water surface  appears  to  be  in  virgin  condition
 1.   Trace  pollution - some  evidence  of floating material  - not
     significant
 2.   Obvious  pollution -  readily observable amounts  of  debris -
     unsightly
 3.   Offensive pollution  - sufficient quantities of pollutants
     present  that  you wouldn't  go  in  the water
                                                  Recorder
      Figure  24.   Example  of  Aesthetic  Rating Sheet for Evaluating
                  Ocean  Surface  Pollution
	Table  7.   COMPARISON  OF  AESTHETIC  IMPACT WITH HEM	
 HEM, mg/m2                               Average rating
   0.005	0  -  Water surface  in  virgin state
   0.050	1  -  Some flotage evident but insignificant
   3       	  3  -  Offensive  (in  standing slick over Hyperion
                          outfall, April  1971)
   9       	  1.5  -  Flotage obvious and  somewhat unsightly
  32.5     	  2.3  -  Flotage obvious and  unsightly - offensive to
                          some
                                   55

-------
Bacteria

Table 4 lists the results of the bacterial analyses.  All of these analyses
were made in 1971 when the effluents were not being chlorinated.  An oppor-
tunity was missed to evaluate the effect of chlorination when these analyses
were eliminated in the 1973 survey.

The bacteria were collected on membrane filters and incubated in differen-
tiating media in accord with Standard Methods [5].  Only typical coliform
bacteria colonies were counted and recorded (green metallic sheen) but
many more atypical colonies appeared on the filters.  The atypical colonies
were highly concentrated over the outfalls but a few were found in the
samples collected on the northeastern side of Santa Catalina Island (Station
3a) in the spring of 1971.  As a result, the control area was shifted to the
seaward side of the island in the summer survey where no bacterial colonies
of any type developed on the membrane filters.

Figure 25 shows the cumulative frequency distributions of the coliform
bacteria surface concentrations found over the various outfalls in 1971.
The median values of the surface concentration varied widely, with that
observed over the Hyperion outfall in August 1971 being significantly less
than the others.  All of the trawls of the August-September survey were
conducted during periods of high wind,  when the sea slicks had
been, or were on the verge of being destroyed.  Undoubtedly the counts would
have been higher during a calm spell when all of the particulates would
have been present at the air-sea interface.

The coliform samples were collected and analyzed independently of all the
other particulate analyses.  Even so, an approximate relationship appears
to exist between the coliform organisms and the HEM as shown in Table 8.

Aside from the observations made over the Hyperion outfall in August 1971,
the table shows that the number of organisms found per mg of HEM was
remarkably consistent in the samples taken over or near the marine outfalls.
                                    56

-------
   200
eg
Hype ri on
 A
April 7, 1971  o
   100 —
 CO
 a:
 o
 S  50
 oo
 Q
 CO

 o
                    20  30  40  50  60   70    80    90

                   PERCENT EQUAL TO OR LESS THAN
                          95
Figure 25.  Cumulative Frequency Distributions  of Coliform  Bacteria
            Surface Concentration:  1971

         Table 8.  COMPARISON OF COLIFORM BACTERIA WITH HEM


Locati on
Hyperi on

JWPCP
3.7 km N
of Hyperion
(3a)
Control
(3b)


Date
IV-7-71
VIII-31-71
IX-3-71
IV-7-71
IX-1-71
IV-8-71

IX-2-71
HEM
mg/m2
(average)
10.8
2.0
2.2
0.34
0.13
0.025

0.0012
Coliform bacteria
no./m2
(median)
150,000a
3,000
63,000
6,450a
2,500
<0.0043
(some atypical)
<0.00070


No./mg of HEM
1.4 x 104
1.5 x 103
2.9 x 104
1.9 x 104
1.9 x 1011
<0.2

<0.6
One  trawl  sample only.
                               57

-------
The overall geometric mean value for those areas was 12,000 organisms/mg of
HEM.  The coliform bacteria were not derived from the ocean bulk water
because water samples taken 10 cm underneath the ocean surface  never  indicated
the presence of any of those bacteria.

HEM Concentrations on the Ocean Surface

The average concentration of HEM varied grossly from station to station as
shown below.

        Table 9.  MEAN CONCENTRATIONS OF HEM IN TRAWLED PARTICULATES
Location
Hyperion
JWPCP
3.7 km N of
Hyperion
14 km NW of
JWPCP
Control (3a)
Control (3b)
April, 1971
10,800

340

25

Aug. -Sept., 1971
2,000
2,200
130


1.2
July, 1973

15,000

36

2.1
 These data are much too few to estimate accurately the total mass of HEM of
 wastewater origin present on the ocean surface at any given time.  Still,
 it  is believed that even a crude estimate is better than none at all,
 so  a concentration distribution of HEM was assumed and the total mass of
 HEM computed as shown in Figure 26.

 The concentration distribution shown in that figure was estimated by sub-
 tracting an assumed background concentration of HEM of 5 yg/m2 from the
 average values presented in Table 9.  (The HEM data of Aug.-September, 1971
were not used because of the unfavorable winds existing at the time of
sampling.)  The zonep of highest concentration about the outfalls were
arbitrarily assumed to be about 3.5 km in diameter but they could have been
much more, or much less extensive than that.
                                     58

-------
                                    HYPERION OUTFALL
                                       SANTA CATALINA ISLAND
                                         Contours = yg/m2 of HEM
                           Calculations
HEM
cone.
yg/m2
0

20

30

300

12,500

Area
(km)2
2300

2300

700

90

20
Avg.
end area
(km) 2

2300

1500

400

55

Incremental
cone.
yg/m2

20

10

270

12,200

Incremental
weight
kg

46

15

108

671

Total 840
Figure 26.  Estimate of Mass of Wastewater HEM  Present on
            Ocean Surface - Trawl Samples
                            59

-------
The results indicate a surprisingly small total mount of HEM of wastewater
origins on the ocean surface, only 840 kg or so.  Even if this estimate is
in error by a factor of 10, the total  amount of HEM still remains small.
To comprehend this more fully, the amount of HEM being discharged daily to
the area must be known.  Two different methods of effluent sampling were
employed to obtain this information.  They were:

     1.  In the surveys of 1971, 1.5 £ of composited effluent were mixed
with clean sea water and the flotage was separated in a specially designed
funnel.  The separated flotage was then extracted with hexane in a soxhlet
apparatus.  The details of this method are given in Ref. [8] and the results
for the Hyperion effluent are shown in Table 10.  The results of this approach
are questionable because particulates  with sizes greater than 0.5 mm were
relatively scarce in the effluents studied, and the flotage derived from a
sample as small as 1.5 i could have been composed primarily of particulates
smaller than 0.5 mm.

     Table 10.  ANALYSES OF 24-HR COMPOSITE SAMPLES OF HYPERION EFFLUENT
                DURING OCEAN SURVEYS OF 1971
Measure
Measured by Hyperion staff
Grease and oil
Suspended solids
Vol. suspended solids
Col i form organisms9
AM
PM
Measured by this project staff
Bulk hexane extractables
Dry weight of floatables
Hexane extractables in floatables
April 6-7
1971

12 mg/£
64 mg/£
50 mg/£

260,000/m£
186, DOOM

10.7 mg/i
4.8 mg/£
0.15 mg/£
Aug. 30-31
1971

9 mg/&
81 mg/&
76 mg/fc

430, 000 /m A
930,000/m*

8.2 mg/A
3.1 mg/a
0.30 mg/£
         Determined from grab samples.
                                     60

-------
     2.  The sampling method was improved in 1973 by pumping a portion of
the JWPCP effluent through a screen identical to that used in the surface
trawl.  The screen approach velocity was 0.8 m/s, the same as used in sur-
face trawling.  A maximum of 18 A of the JWPCP effluent could be passed
through the screen before serious clogging occurred.  The material collected
was then extracted with hexane in a soxhlet apparatus.  The average HEM
concentration of 5 such samples collected through the day on July 13, 1973
is presented in Table 6.

This method could have been improved further by resuspending the captured
particulates in clean sea water and separating again in a funnel of the
type used in 1971 before extracting with hexane.  In this way only those
particulates which float in sea water would have been extracted.  It is
believed that such an improvement would not have altered the results
grossly.

The emission rates of HEM from the treatment plants were estimated by
multiplying the effluent concentrations of HEM by the plant flows existing
at the time of the ocean surveys (Table 2).  The results, shown in Table 11,
indicate that a metric ton or so of HEM was being released daily to the
study area.  Comparing this with the mass found on the ocean surface
(840 kg) indicates that either the residence time of the particulates on
the ocean surface was very short (order of a very few days), or the HEM
found in the effluents did not attain the surface.  Other alternatives
might be a rapid decay in the particulates, which seems highly unlikely
because the grease and wax particulates were large and they obviously had
persisted for  some  period of time when stuck to kelp; erosion into smaller
particulates missed by the trawl screen; or concentrating in regions not
sampled in this study.

To determine if all of the HEM sampled in the plant effluents actually  attained
the ocean surface a local mass balance was made about the outfalls using the
steady state continuity equation in the form
                                 Vw = c Ub
                                     61

-------
           Table 11.   MASS EMISSION RATES OF PARTICIPATE HEM FROM
                      TREATMENT PLANTS
Plant
Hyperion
Hyperion
JWPCP
Day
IV-7-71
VIII-31-71
VII-11-73
kg of HEM/day
190
390
880
where Q  is the effluent flow rate, c  the concentration of HEM in the
       w                             w
effluent, c the concentration of HEM on the ocean surface, U the surface
current, and b the width of the diffuser projected normal to the direction
of U.  The product Q c  is the plant emission rate given in Table 11.

The main problem with this approach is determing U.  Surface drogues were
used to measure the drift over the outfalls (see Figures 7 to 15) but those
drogues were set to a 2 m depth, and experiences of the tracer survey of
December 9, 1971 (Figure 11) showed that such drogues did not move with
pellets placed on the ocean surface.  Even so, for want of better data, the
drifts measured by the drogues were used to compute U.   These estimates
together with computed and observed concentrations of HEM are shown in
Table 12-

Considering all the assumptions which had to be made, the agreement between
computed and observed concentrations of HEM over the outfalls was good, and
the differences were in the right direction (the observed being less than the
computed).  Some difficulty was encountered in computing the concentration
over the JWPCP outfalls in 1973 because the current measured by the drogue
was remarkably low (0.11 m/s) which in turn gave a remarkably high computed
concentration (114 mg/m2).  Obviously if the current was this small, other
factors such as plume spread would increase the dispersion and reduce the
concentration from that obtained with the continuity equation.

The results of these analyses indicated that most of the particulates screened
from the effluents reached the ocean surface.  Their residence time on the
ocean surface may have been remarkably short, a matter of a day or so.  Their
                                     62

-------
                            Table 12.   LOCAL MASS BALANCE ON HEM  OF  TRAWLED PARTICIPATES

Outfalls
Hyperion
Hyperion
JWPCP3


Date
IV-7-71
VIII-31-71
VII-11-73

Surface current
U

m/s
0.17
0.18
0.11

Direct.
true
NNE
NE
NW

Diffuser
length
b
m
1100
1800
800

Concentration of HEM, mg/m2
Calculated
c
12
14
114


Observed
11 (slick average)
6.6 (eastern-most trawl)
32.5 (western leg of L diffuser)
5.4 (avg. over Y diffuser)
co
            Y and L diffusers considered together.

-------
disappearance most likely was not caused by rapid bacterial decomposition
but rather some mechanism of removal  from,  or transport out of the entire
study area.  For example, the particulates  could have been filtered out  on
the kelp, consumed by aquatic birds,  or transported to the coast by the
wind or internal waves.   All of these factors were observed in operation
during the various ocean surveys.

Transport Study

An attempt was made to measure the movement of large polyethylene pellets
(average size of 4 mm and a specific  gravity of 0.985) on the ocean surface
on December 9, 1971.  As usual the weather  was not particularly conducive
for such work with the wind being onshore and in excess of 3.6 m/s in the
morning.  This was sufficient to destroy any slicks which might have existed
in the study area.

The wind did decrease around 2 pm, however, and band slicks formed in the
area as shown in Figure 11.  At 2:40  pm, 400 g of the pellets were seeded
along 12.5 m of the shoreward edge of a band slick at a density of approxi-
mately 900 pellets/m of slick.  A surface drogue set for a 2 m depth was
also released at that location.

The pellets were followed for a period of 80 minutes and they remained more
or less undispersed along the shoreward side of the slick.  The slick moved
shoreward with an average speed of 0.20 m/s while the wind steadily decreased
to values of less than 2.8 m/s.  The  drogue was  not followed but it ended up
well southward and seaward of the pellets.

There was a comparatively slight amount of  stratification in the water to a
depth of 80 m but internal waves were present [9] and the band slicks appeared
to be associated with the internal waves.  Unfortunately, these observations
had to be terminated with the early onset of dusk (5 pm), and it is not clear
if the pellets and band slick were being moved shoreward by the onshore wind
or the internal waves.  Also it would have  been interesting to record the
fate of the pellets in the surf zone, and if pellets added between the
slick bands would eventually be incorporated into one of the slicks.

                                     64

-------
CONTROL OF SURFACE POLLUTION

The suggestions made herein apply only to the conditions encountered in this
study; i.e., primary unchlorinated wastewater effluents submerged beneath
an ocean thermocline.  Surfacing plumes should give concentrations of parti -
culates at least as great as those found in this study, however.  Effects
of chlorination on the coliform bacteria contained in the large particulates
is unknown but it is likely that the particulates will protect the bacteria
from the disinfectant.

Hexane extractable materials (HEM) appear to be the best general analysis
for this type of surface pollution.  The question remains as to what is a
reasonable and safe upper limit for the HEM on the ocean surface.   The  only
measures at hand which could aid in this judgment were aesthetic impact
(Table 7) and coliform bacteria (Table 8).  Pesticides and PCB compounds
were not of great help because their proportions in the particulates were
very slight (although foraging aquatic birds might have obtained appreciable
doses of the chlorinated hydrocarbons if they consumed enough of the parti-
culates).  Fatty acids, fats, and alkanes are benign in the ocean  environment,
at least at the rates of emission estimated for the large particulates.

The aesthetic ratings given in Table 7 indicated a maximum safe level of perhaps
3 mg/m2 of HEM (see p. 54).  The coliform data presented in Table  8 were far
more difficult to judge, their public health significance being unknown.
A commonly accepted standard for ocean bathing waters is less than 1000
total coliform bacteria/100 ma 80% of the time, but a surface concentration
cannot be expressed conveniently in terms of a volumetric concentration.
For example, the surface trawl used in this study strained the surface
water to a depth of approximately 3 cm, but the same particulates  would
have been captured at a trawl depth of 2 cm or less.  Thus, the volumetric
concentration increases in proportion with the decrease in the sampling
depth considered significant.  The depth cannot be considered infinitesimally
                                     65

-------
small, or there would be insufficient space to hold the particulates.
Figure 17 shows that about 99% of the grease and wax particulates captured
in 1971 had sizes equal to or less than 5 mm.  It was assumed somewhat arbi-
trarily  that a depth less than this would exclude a significant portion of
the grease and wax particulates.

It was found that 1 mg of HEM contained a median of 12,000 coliform bacteria
(Table 8 and subsequent discussion).  Allowing for a depth of 0.5 cm, approxi-
mately 4 mg/m2 of HEM would give a median volumetric concentration of 1000
organisms/100 ma ([1000/100 m£] x [5,000 m£/m2] x [1/12,000/mg] = 4.2 mg/m2).
Figure 25 shows that the 80% value of the cumulative frequency distributions
for surface coliform concentrations was about twice that for the 50% value;
consequently, a median of about 2 mg/m2 of HEM would be necessary to insure
that  1000 organisms/100 ma would not be exceeded in 80% of the samples.

Intuitively, one feels  that a coliform standard for floating parti-
culates should be more strict than for the bulk sea water.  For example, one
grease and wax particulate may contain 12,000 coliform bacteria.  This would
be equivalent to 1.2 £ of seawater at a concentration of 1000 bacteria/100 m.
No individual would swallow 1.2 £ of seawater voluntarily, but he might ingest
relatively easily a small floating grease particulate.  Also, Table 8 indi-
cates  that no appreciable coliform die-away occurred in the particulates
collected 3.7 km north of the Hyperion outfall.  This is not too surprising
because the particulates may shield the bacteria and any pathogens present
against the rather hostile ocean environment.  Some decay must occur but
apparently it is much less than that demonstrated for coliform organisms
in bulk seawater.  Thus, the relatively rapid rate of bacterial decay usually
used  in ocean outfall design cannot be relied upon in the case of floating
particulates.

The results of these studies indicated that wastewater pollution may be
detected to concentrations as low as 0.02 mg/m2 of HEM (Figure 26),  The
maximum concentration observed was approximately 33 mg/m2 (Table 3).  Both
the aesthetic ratings and col 1 form bacteria analyses indicated that a
reasonable concentration should be something less than 3 mg/m2 of HEM.  A

                                    66

-------
reasonable limit might be 1 mg/m2, about 50 times greater than the detectable
limit and 33 times less than the maximum concentration observed.

This recommendation may now be compared with the requirements of the Cali-
fornia State Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters of California,
1972 (7).

Chapter II A
B.  Physical Characteristics

1.  Floating particulates and grease and oil shall not be visible.

Floating particulates at the Marine!and sampling station (14 km NW of the
JWPCP outfalls) were judged visible but not unsightly by the rating panel
used in this study (see Table 3).  The HEM concentration was only 0.054
mg/m2, yet the fatty acid analyses showed that some of the HEM must have been
derived from wastewater outfalls (see Figure 19).  If taken literally, the
above requirement is very strict.  Its intent probably was to control gross
emissions of floatage of obvious wastewater origin over the outfall diffusers.
(Grease and oil slicks are discussed in a subsequent section of this  report.)

2.  The concentration of grease and oil (hexane extractables) on the  water
    surface shall not exceed 10 mg/m2 more than 50 percent of the time,
    nor 20 mg/m2 more than 10 percent of the time.  (The samples shall be
    taken in the areas of maximum probable impact.)

The method of sampling is not specified in this requirement and in some
cases natural surface film concentrations may build up appreciably,
necessitating the use of rather liberal HEM limits.  This requirement
probably was intended to control concentrations of surface film materials.
It is nearly useless in controlling large grease and wax particulates, being
much ten liberal.
                                     67

-------
3.   The concentration of floating particulates of waste origin on the water
    surface shall  not exceed 1.0 mg dry weight/m2 more than 50 percent of the
    time, nor 1.5  mg dry weight/m2 more than 10 percent of the time.  (The
    samples shall  be taken in areas of maximum probable impact.)

In this study the  dry weight of the sewage types generally was not determined
separately from that of the natural types.  Over the outfalls the HEM repre-
sented about 50 percent of the total  dry weight when pieces of seaweed, tar,
etc. were not prevalent (see Figure 23).  The requirement therefore implies
limits on HEM about half those stated for dry weight, or about half the
level recommended  herein for HEM.

If the experiences of this study are  valid, the above requirement would be
difficult and expensive to enforce with primary effluents because dry weight
is not the appropriate analysis for grease and wax particulates, yet they
were found to be the predominant sewage type in all of the trawl samples taken
during the study.   The requirement could be used to control the emission of
non-extractable sewage types (plastic, rubber, etc.) but no reasonable
criterion can be suggested based on the results of this study because the
non-extractable sewage types were encountered relatively infrequently.
Obviously the requirement should be rewritten in terms of HEM, not dry
weight.  Stipulations on dry weight should specify the types of non-extractables
to be weighed; making it possible to  pick such objects out of the sample and
to clean and weigh  them without the  services of an expert or the expenditure
of a great amount  of effort.
                                    68

-------
                           VI.  MICRO-PARTICULATES

SAMPLING PROCEDURE

Nylon netting was used to collect coliform bacteria from the ocean surface.
At the request of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project,
who had furnished some of the funds and sampling craft used in the 1971
ocean surveys, the netting was also used to collect samples for neuston
(surface plankton).  Upon analyzing the neuston samples it was observed that
the samples contained debris, some being colored and of an obvious artifi-
cial nature.  Particulates captured in this manner are called "micro-particulates"
in this report.

The nylon netting used in this type of sampling had a two-filament knit with
0.75 to 1 mm openings when purchased new.  A sample was obtained by spreading
the netting carefully over the water surface and collecting the surface
layer into the cloth via capillary action.  Being coarsely woven, this
netting lost the water collected easily so it had to be lifted from the
water surface and inserted into the sample container with great care.   Even
so, much of the water was lost in the process.  Laboratory tests conducted
under ideal conditions showed that the netting collected a surface layer
averaging 0.1 mm deep from sea water at 22°C when no water was lost from
the cloth.  This information was used to compute the surface area sampled
at sea by dividing the volume of sample collected by 0.1 mm.

The nylon netting was used to collect the coliform bacteria and neuston
because the organisms had to be separated from the cloth for further analysis,
and laboratory tests showed that this netting released such organisms  readily
upon repeated washing.  The organisms could then be collected on a membrane
filter by passing the water released from the cloth together with the  wash
water through the filter.  Samples for coliform bacteria were then incubated
in accord with Standard Methods [5] while the neuston and micro-particulate
samples were examined directly on the filter with the aid of a microscope.
                                    69

-------
At first the cloths used to collect the neuston and micro-particulates had
an area of 0.4 m2 but this size proved awkward to handle at sea.  All of the
cloths were reduced to a uniform area of 0.1  m2 in the August-September 1971
survey.  (The cloths used to collect the bacteria samples were always 0.1  m2
in area.)  Neither coliform bacteria nor micro-particulate samples were col-
lected in the July 1973 survey.

ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE

The resolution employed to count and identify the neuston and micro-particulates
in the April 1971 survey was 200X,  and approximately 0.3% of the membrane
filter area was examined.  One sample was collected in slick areas at each
station and the average volume of water collected was 36 nu.  Thus, the
area of sea surface actually examined was approximately 0.0011 m2 per
sample.  This gives a least count of approximately 1000 particulates of a
given type/m2.

The area of the cloths was reduced  to 0.1 m2  and the magnification increased
to 430X in the August-September 1971 survey.   In this case the netting was
spread over the water surface several times  at a given location until a
sample volume deemed sufficient was collected.  Eight independent samples
were collected at most of the stations; four  in slick areas  and four in
non-slick areas.  The average volume of water collected per  sample was 32 ma,
about the same as collected in the  April  survey.

The proportion of the filter examined was reduced to 0.1% from the 0.3%
used in the April survey.  Thus, the area of  the sea surface actually analyzed
was approximately 0.0003 m2 per sample.  The  results presented in Table 13
represent the average of four such  samples; consequently the actual coverage
was approximately the same for both surveys.

RESULTS

The composition and concentration of the micro-particulates  varied grossly
between the two surveys.   The differences in  concentration can be explained,

                                     70

-------
   iable 13.   COMPOSITION AND CONCENTRATION OF PARTICULATES CAPTURED BY
                         THE CLOTH SCREEN SAMPLER
                      (concentrations in thousands/m2)



Location
Hyperi on
outfall
JWPCPa
outfalls
Hyperion,
3.7 km N
Control
areas



Type
S
NS
S
NS
S
NS
S
NS
April, 1971 (200X)
No.
of
obs.
1



1

1



A




37

1



B






1



C






1



D
46





1



E
15



11

9

Aug. -Sept., 1971 (430X)
No.
of
obs.
2
4

8
4
4
4
4


D
6.5
0

2.6
1.8
3.2
0.7
5.8


F
1635
328

260
310
411
243
560


G
299
42

21
20
30
30
35


H

1.7

0.3



1.6
    Windy day

   Classification Code:

       A      Blue
       B      Purple
       C      Irradiant
       D      Fibers
       E      Metallic
       F      Clumped or flocculated minute debris
       G      Black
       H      Other

       S      Slick
      NS      Non-slick

at least in part, by the differences in magnification  employed,  but the

particulates found in the August-September 1971  survey should  also have

been observed in the April  survey, and vice-versa, because  the field coverage

was about the same.   For example, the large numbers of blue and metallic

appearing particulates found in the vicinity of the Hyperion outfall in

April 1971 did not appear at all in the samples collected in August-September,

The black and clumped particulates observed so frequently in the August-
                                    71

-------
September survey, on the other hand, were not noticed at all in the April
survey.

The particulates forming the clumps of debris observed in the second survey
of 1971 were packed too tightly together to permit individual counting or
typing.  The sizes of the clumps were distributed in a log-normal manner as
shown in Figure 27.  The size distributions changed from location to location
but not from slick to non-slick areas at a given location.  The black parti-
culates evidenced similar trends in sizes.

The nylon netting can sample at best only 0.1 m2 of water surface area.
For the analytical procedures used in this study a given type of particu-
late would have to have a surface concentration in excess of approximately
1000/m2 to be counted.   Figure 27 shows that for the prevalent clumps of
debris particulates, at least 99% of the particulates were smaller than  100 y.
Thus, a gap existed in  the sampling and analytical  techniques
employed in this study  to characterize the particulates.  Particulates
greater than 0.5 mm in  size were collected by the surface trawl  and
those smaller than 0.1  mm and in concentrations greater than 1000/m2 were
collected with the nylon netting.  Particulates smaller than 0.5 mm and  in
concentrations less than 1000/m2 generally were missed.

Tables 13 and 14 summarize the results of the micro-particulate studies
made in the August-September 1971 survey.   The tables show that their
concentrations were surprisingly great, and that their average volume/m2
may have been greater than that observed for the trawled particulates
during the same survey  (assuming that the specific gravity of the trawled
particulates was close  to one).   The predominant type of micro-particulate
found in the August-September 1971  survey was the clumps of debris.  The
black particulates were also very prevalent.
                                     72

-------
                                          OVER HYPERION  OUTFALL
                                    20   30   40  50   60   70   80

                                   PERCENT EQUAL TO OR  LESS THAN
90    95    98  99
Figure 27.  Cumulative Frequency Distribution of Clumps  of Debris Collected By The Nylon Netting:
            August-September,  1971.

-------
    Table  14   SIZES  OF  PREVALENT  TYPES  OF PARTICULATES CAPTURED BY THE
               CLOTH  SCREEN  SAMPLER:   AUGUST-SEPTEMBER, 1971

Clumps of debris
Median size, y
Mean size, y
Concentrati on, k/m2
Black parti culates
Median size, y
Mean size, y
Concentrati on ,k/m2
Hyperion
outfall
5.5
12
581
4
5.5
92
JWPCP
outfalls
2.5
6.5
260
4
5.5
21
Hyperion,
3.7 km N
3.5
8.2
363
4
5.5
25
Control
area
2.5
6.5
388
3
4.1
33
The particulates tended to increase in numbers over the Hyperion outfall
(Table 14), but those collected over the JWPCP outfalls had about the same
concentrations as observed in the control area, and north of the Hyperion
outfall.   (It should be recalled that samples were collected over the
JWPCP outfalls on a windy day.)  Again with the exception of the-samples
collected over the Hyperion outfall, no significant differences in the
concentrations of particulates were found between slick and non-slick areas
(Table 13).

The sizes of the micro-particulates tended to decrease with distance from
the Hyperion outfall  (Table 14) but again the samples collected over the
JWPCP outfalls contained micro-particulates whose sizes were nearly equal
to those  found in the control area.  No significant differences in participate
size were noted between slick and non-slick areas at a given location.
                                    74

-------
CONCLUSIONS

The project staff decided to abandon the micro-particulate sampling after
the rather inconclusive results obtained in the August-September 1971  survey.
Obviously the source of the particulates found in that survey could very  well
have been atmospheric fallout with the clumped debris being dust blown from
the mainland.  The ocean surface appeared very clean in the July 1973  survey
and possibly micro-particulate sampling conducted at that time would have
revealed more about the nature of the micro-particulates.  The best that  can
be stated at this time is that the numbers and volumes of such particulates
were gross and it appears that some of them were truly derived from the
wastewater effluents as discussed in the following section.
                                     75

-------
                      VII.  SURFACE SCREEN SAMPLES

SAMPLING PROCEDURE

Surface films have been collected on solid surfaces and metal screens for
years.  A solid surface dipped vertically through a surface film will collect
one coat of film material on the way down and another on the way up.  The
thickness of the coating will depend on the speed with which the solid is
passed through the film and the ability of new film to move into the areas
of film depletion.  This makes a quantitative estimate of the surface concen-
tration of the film difficult, if not impossible.

Metal screens are an improvement because the closely spaced solid surfaces
insure that most of the film contained between the wires will be collected
while at the same time they inhibit the movement of new film into the area
being sampled.  Metal screens have the drawback of not being easily extracted
from grease and oil, and they tend to sag from the center no matter how
tightly stretched.  Cloth screens, first used in this study, could be
extracted relatively easily with hexane by folding and inserting into a
soxhlet apparatus.  They also tended to conform to the ocean surface and
could be handled easily at sea.  Their major disadvantage was that most
fabrics could not be stripped of their background of hexane extractables
even after hours of extraction [10].  Glass fabrics could be cleaned rela-
tively easily, and they were used to collect surface film samples
for HEM analysis.   The glass cloth utilized had a 0.003-inch (7.6 y) thread
diameter,  a 40 x 39 warp and fill, and a 2.12 oz/sq yd (72 gm/m2) weight
when purchased new.  It was commonly used in the construction of fiberglass
boat decks and generally referred to as "deck cloth."

Individual sampling cloths were cut to an area of 0.1 m2.  The cloths were
cut slightly oversized because they shrank slightly when subjected to the
initial  cleaning procedures.  Once cleaned, the cloths released grease and
oil collected from the water surface easily, and they were reused until they

                                    76

-------
unraveled.  Their life could have been prolonged greatly by sewing about
the edges.

The glass cloth was relatively heavy and closely woven.  Water, bacteria,
and micro-particulates collected into the fabric were not released easily
when washed with water.  For this reason the cloth could not be used to
collect those samples which required easy release to analyze; i.e., coliform
bacteria, neuston, and micro-particulates.

The cloths were applied to the ocean surface with clean wooden  tongs  and
allowed to rest on the surface under their own weight.  Clean fiberglass
rods were then inserted under the center of the cloths as quickly as  possible
and they were raised from the surface and rolled about the rods for insertion
into individual sample containers.  Some water dripped from the cloths  in
the process but measurements showed that most must have remained in the
cloths.  The average volume of water held on the 0.1  m2 cloths  in the July
1973 survey was 12.8 ma with a coefficient of variation of 11%.  Laboratory
tests indicated a pickup of about 15 ma without rolling,  but  some  of  this
water could have been excess fluid lying on the surface of the  cloth.   It
appears that the water was bound tightly in the cloth by  surface tension
and the depth of water sampled may have varied between 0.128  and
0.15 mm.

SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL ACCURACY

The analytical methods utilized paralleled those employed for the trawled
particulates.  The glass cloths were first air-dried  and extracted with
hexane in a soxhlet apparatus without prior acidification or saponification.
The long-chain fatty acids (C12-C22) present in the HEM were  analyzed by
reacting the HEM with the BFT reagent to form fatty acid esters which were
then identified and measured quantitatively by techniques of gas-liquid
chromatography.  The PCB compounds and some pesticides were separated from
the HEM in an activated silica column and determined  by methods of gas-liquid
chromatography.
                                    77

-------
These approaches measured insoluble duplex films adequately.  A vegetable
oil composed primarily of unsaturated C16 and C18 fatty acid esters was
dissolved into hexane and spread on clean sea water at 20°C.  The hexane
was allowed to evaporate and the average surface concentration was computed
to be 71 mg/m2.  The film was sampled with a 0.1 m2 glass cloth and extracted
with hexane.  The results indicated a surface concentration of 76 mg/m2,
within 7% of that computed.

A duplex film is also created in oil spills and is commonly thought of as
being surface pollution.  Natural  sea slicks are formed by films one molecule
thick, and such monolayers are not well understood.

Palmitic acid (saturated C16) was  added to the surface of distilled, care-
fully cleaned water employing the classical procedures of Langmuir [11] and
Adam [12].  The bulk water had a pH of 5.5 and a stable monolayer was formed
having an area of 19.7 A2 per acid molecule (slightly less than the commonly
accepted value of 20.5 A2 for any normal saturated fatty acid).  The layer
was sampled with 0.1 m2 glass cloths with the reduction in the surface area
of the film being measured after each sampling.   The reduction in area
averaged 0.095 m2 with a coefficient of variation of 3.7%.  This indicates
that the cloths consistently collected 95% of the palmitic acid monolayer.
Stearic acid (saturated C18) would undoubtedly have behaved in the same way.

The pH of sea water is normally relatively high  and only tiny fractions of
the fatty acids will remain  undissociated in the bulk water phase.  Depending
on the concentrations involved, the dissociated acids can form insoluble
salts with the divalent cations present in the sea water.  Magnesium salts
probably would predominate because their solubility products are the
smallest of all  the cations  commonly encountered in sea water.  Such insoluble
salts can move to the water  surface to aid in the formation of sea slicks.
The stability of fatty acid  salt films seems to be dependent on the
concentrations and proportions of cations and acids present.  Fatty acid
salt films are poorly understood and have been investigated little in the
past.
                                   78

-------
In sumnary, it is believed that the glass cloth sampler collected insoluble
duplex and stable monolayer surface films accurately.  The divalent acid
salts probably were not extracted to any significant extent with the hexane
because the samples were not acidified.  Alkanes, fats, free fatty acids,
alcohols, etc. were extracted to become a part of the HEM but only the free
fatty acids were analyzed because the fatty acid esters were not decomposed
first by saponifying.   Acidification and saponification were not easily
performed on the minute quantities of material collected in the cloth screens,
and every additional  analytical  step introduced the spectre of more back-
ground contamination.   It should also be recalled that micro-particulates
were found in great profusion on the sea surface and that they also would
be captured by the glass cloth sampler; consequently, it was difficult to
assess which portions  of the HEM or fatty acids were derived from the surface
film and which from the micro-particulates.

RESULTS OF SURVEYS

Hexane Extractable Materials (HEM)
Four individual glass  cloth samples were collected at each station in the
April 1971 survey.  These samples were taken in slick areas only.  The
sampling was extended to both slick and non-slick areas in the August-
September 1971 survey with rather inconclusive results.  The sampling
frequency was then increased greatly in the July 1973 survey as shown in
Table 15.

The table shows that the HEM concentrations were extremely variable and that
they decreased grossly on the average from 1971 to 1973.  That decrease
might have been caused in part by increasing analytical precision in the
second year, but it could have stemned as well from actual seasonal  and
weather effects.  Some of the HEM concentrations found in the 1973 survey
were so low they approached the background levels still existing in the
glass cloths  (0.10 mg/m2 or less).  Those particular observations are
indicated by dashes in Table 15.  (The 1973 observations were corrected for
a background of 0.10 mg/m2 which stemmed from the glass cloth screens
employed.)
                                     79

-------
Table 15.  Concentration of Cloth  Screen HEM
              (cone, in mg/m2)


Type






C 1 -i /-I/
O 11 CK







Mean






Non-
i • i
slick





Mean

Hyperion Outfall
IV- 7-71
12.60
0.25
1.40
1.35











3.90














VIII-31-71
1.60
2.15
1.55
3.05
0.85










1.84
0.30
1.20
2.12
1.30









1.23

JWPCP Outfalls
IX-3-71
















1.45a
1.80
1.10
0.95
0.50
2.30
3.60
1.50
0.65
3.10



1.70
VII-11-73
0.35
1.50
1.00
0.40
0.64
0.32
0.38
1.29
0.71
3.41
0.82
0.73
0.60
1.00
0.45
0.91
0.26
0.45
0.41
0.23
3.96
0.60
1.08
1.10
1.03
0.82
0.82


0.98
Hyperion,
3.7 km N
IV-7-71
2.10
5.75
1.20
1.70











2.69
0.12













IX-1-71
1.25
0.80
1.45
3.30











1.70
0.75
1.40
1.05
1.85









1.26
JWPCP
14 km NW
VII-12-73
0.33
0.40
1.95
0.54
0.12
0.64
0.47








0.64
_
0.20
0.25
0.24
0.34
0.25
0.47
0.21
0.13




0.23
Control Areas
3a 3b 3b
IV-8-71
1.30
2.65
2.80
1.40











2.04














IX-2-71
0.80
0.75
2.25
1.60











1.35
1.05
3.35
1.30
-









1.43
VII-13-73
0.23
-
0.32
0.29
0.36
0.38
-
_
0.15
0.23
0.58
0.18
0.62
0.27

0.26

0.40
0.16
0.35
0.06
0.08
0.13
0.13
0.20
0.25
0.12
0.08
0.10
0.16
aWindy conditions, no slicks present. See Table 16 for location over diffusers.

-------
Fatty Acids (FA)
Table 16 lists the overall weights of the long-chain fatty acids (C12-C22)
found in the cloth screen samples collected in the July 1973 survey.   The
ranking of the observations is identical to that presented for HEM concen-
trations in Table 15, so direct comparisons can be made if so desired.  No
significant background of FA existed in the glass cloth screens.

Fatty acids were not determined on the samples collected in the April 1971
survey and the fatty acid composition was not fully evaluated in the
August-September 1971 survey.   The average values of total fatty acid con-
centration found in the latter survey are presented in terms of percent of
HEM in Table 17.  (The means listed in Table 17 do not always compare with
those given in Table 15 because not all  of the HEM samples were analyzed for FA.)

Coliform Bacteria
Surface coliform bacteria were collected independently with the nylon net
sampler as described previously in Section VI.  Bulk water samples for
coliform organisms were collected 10 cm underneath the surface screen
samples with the aid of a sterile Cornwall continuous pipetting device.
The bacteria were separated and incubated on membrane filters in accord
with Standard Methods [5].  Bacteria samples were not collected in the 1973
survey.

The screen samples were always taken in slick areas in tandem with the glass
cloth samples except in the region of the JWPCP outfalls on September 3,
1971 when no sea slicks were visible.  The results of these observations are
presented in Table 18.

PCB Compounds
Glass cloth samples collected in a given region were pooled to obtain suffi-
cient HEM to analyze for PCB compounds and pesticides.  Small quantities
of such pesticides as DDE and DDT were observed frequently but their  concen-
trations were always very much less than the PCB compounds so their magnitudes
were not ascertained.  The results of the pooled screen samples are presented
in Table 19.
                                    81

-------
Table 16.   CONCENTRATION  OF  CLOTH  SCREEN  FATTY ACIDS:  JULY,  1973
                         (cone, in yg/m2)


Type







Slick







Mean




Non- Slick








Mean
Over JWPCP
Outfalls
VII-11-73



_i







>-



31.0
lost
160.2
47.5
128.2
49.4
26.3
223.0
28.1
112.4
114.5
45.3
82.9
94.3
61.4
86


_i






>-





20.2
87.3
68.7
27.0
286.7
49.1
100.5
65.8
139.5
90.5
62.5



91
JWPCP
14 km NW
VII-12-73
17.3
13.3
73.1
12.1
14.2
8.4
2.4








20.1
4.7
10.1
20.0
11.4
11.7
14.5
3.1
1.3
-





8.5

Control
VII-13-73
5.9
1.0
8.6
1.2
15.8
8.9
6.4
1.4
-
1.3
1.2
3.0
6.1
2.9

4.6

12.4
9.7
7.6
3.6
5.8
5.2
1.7
12.5
3.5
14.3
1.8
5.7
11.9
7.4
                               82

-------
                     Table  17.  MEAN  CONCENTRATIONS  OF  CLOTH  SCREEN  HEM  AND  FATTY  ACIDS
                                           (concentration  in mg/m2)
CO
CO
Location
Hyperion
outfall

JWPCP
outfalls


Hyperion,
3.7 km N
JWPCP,
14 km NW
Control
areas



Y
L









Type9
S
NS
S
NS
S
NS
S
NS
S
NS
S
NS
April, 1971
No. of
Samples
4





4



4


HEM
3.9





2.7



2.0

*
FA
_





-



-

Aug. -Sept., 1971
No. of
Samples
5
3



9b
4
3


4
3

HEM
1.8
1.5



1.7
1.7
1.4


1.3
1.9
%
FA
12
5



14
14
15


13
21
July, 1973
No. of
Samples


8
6
6
5


7
9
14
13

HEM


1.13
0.91
0.52
1.06


0.64
0.23
0.26
0.16
%
FA


8.4
9.3
14.3
9.2


3.2
3.7
1.8
4.6
            aS = slick and NS = non-slick.

             Windy day - no slicks.

-------
                        Table 18.   CONCENTRATION OF COLIFORM BACTERIA: CLOTH SCREEN
                                           AND OCEAN WATER SAMPLES
Location
Hyperion
outfall
JWPCP
outfalls
Hyperion,
3.7 km N
Control
areas
Date
IV- 7-71
VIII-31-71
IX-3-71
IV- 7- 71
IX-1-71
IV-8-71
IX-2-71
Cloth Screenings
No.
of
Samples
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
m£b
Fi 1 tered
4.7
4.7
4.5
7.2
14.9
1.94
10.0
4.8
5.2
5.4
5.1
5.4
33.2
total
35.1
total
33.9
total
28A
total
No. of
Colonies
41
34
none
none
none
100
none
none
21
none
none
30
none
none
none
none
No.
100 ma
880
720
<22
<14
<7
5150
<10
<21
405
<19
<20
555
<3
<3
<3
<3.5
No.
m~2~
880
720
f22
<14
<7
5150
<10
<21
405
<19
<20
555
<3
<3
<3
<3.5
Bulk Water3
No.
of
Samples
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Total
ma
Sampled
75
400
400
100
400
200
400
No.
of
Colonies
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
No.
100 ma
<1.3
<0.25
<0.25
<1
<0.25
<0.5
<0.25
 Collected 0.10 m under ocean surface.
"W of sample actually filtered,  not ma of sample  collected.

-------
           Table 19.   CONCENTRATION OF CLOTH SCREEN PCB COMPOUNDS
                  (concentration in yg/m2 as Aroclor 1254)






Locati on
Hyperi on


JWPCP
outfalls




Y


1

Hyperion,
3.7 km N
JWPCP,
14 km NW
Control
areas








Type9
S
NS
S
NS
S

NS
S
NS
S
NS
S
NS

April, 1971

b
1










1


PCB
120










<10

% of
HEM
0.96










<0.83

Aug. -Sept. ,
1971

b
4
3




gc
4
4


4
4

PCB
39
3.3




3.1
5.7
5.8


7.5
6.4
% of
HEM
2.2
0.23




0.18
0.36
0.44


0.60
0.35

July, 1973

b


5
6
6

5


7
8
12
12

PCB


8.7
4.7
2.5

3.2


2.0
2.1
1.1
1.3
% of
HEM


0.77
0.52
0.49

0.30


0.31
0.89
0.42
0.80
aS = slick  and  NS  =  non-slick.
 No.  of samples  pooled to obtain  PCB  analysis
°Windy  day  -  no  slicks.
  DISCUSSION  OF  RESULTS

  Coliform  Bacteria
  The  coliform bacteria  provided the  only direct  evidence  that some of the
  flotage collected  by the cloth  samplers  was  derived  from the wastewater
  discharges.  Large numbers  of coliform bacteria were found at times in the
  nylon  net samples  collected over the outfalls  in  the 1971 surveys, but the
  results were highly variable with  either large numbers  being recovered or
  none,  as  shown in  Table  18.   No  coliform  organisms were found in the
                                     85

-------
bulk water samples taken 10 cm underneath the screen samples, and any such
concentration had to be less than approximately one organisms/100 mi.

The variable nature of the data suggests that the bacteria were contained
in fine debris of wastewater origin.   The nylon net sampler collected a
layer about 0.1 mm deep and the maximum size of the particulates captured
was less than 100 y as shown in Figure 27.  It appears that the bacteria
containing debris had sizes of less than 100 y.  If they averaged 100 y then
the volumetric concentration of bacteria in numbers/100 ma would be equal
to the surface concentration in numbers/m2.  If they were  smaller then the
volumetric concentration would be proportionately greater.

Figure 28 shows the cumulative frequency distribution of coliform bacteria
found over the outfalls in 1971 in terms of number/100 ma  (or number/m2).
The frequency distribution was close  to exceeding a bathing water standard
of 1000 organisms/TOO ma for 80% of the time.   These concentrations  probably
would be superimposed on those found  for the trawled particulates (Figure
25).

PCB Compounds
PCB compounds as Aroclor 1254 were highly concentrated in  the slick  areas
over the outfalls as shown in Table 19.  Extraordinary concentrations of
120 and 39 yg/m2 were found over the  Hyperion  outfall in 1971.   These would
be equivalent to volumetric concentrations of  800 and 260  yg/£,  respectively,
assuming a sampling depth of 0.15 mm  for the glass  cloth screens.  These
appear well  in excess of the solubility of PCB compounds in water [13],
suggesting that the PCB compounds were dissolved in the film material and/
or micro-parti culates.   With the exception of  observations made directly
over the various outfalls the PCB fraction of  the cloth screen  HEM was
fairly consistent, averaging about 0.58% by weight.  In the trawled parti-
culates, the PCB fraction of the HEM  was generally  less than 0.10%.   The
PCB compounds apparently tended to concentrate to a greater degree in the
substances collected by the glass cloth sarrplers than in the trawled
particulates.
                                    86

-------
                103 _
            o
            o
     Figure  28.
                102 _
                                     o
                                 o
                              o
                                         INDICATES
                                         LESS THAN
                           v
                           o
                10
    40  50  60   70  80     90    95   98
       PERCENT EQUAL TO OR LESS THAN
Cumulative Frequency Distribution of Coliform Bacteria
Found in Screen Samples Taken Over the Outfalls:
April and September, 1971
 An  appreciable source  of  PCB  compounds  could have been atmospheric
 fallout  [1].  The  fallout along  the  coast within the study area might
 have averaged 0.26 yg/m2-day  as  Aroclor 1254 during the months of
 June and July 1973 [14].   Information concerning decrease in fallout with
 distance from the  coast was unavailable to this study but DDT compounds
 decreased by a factor  of  about 4 from the coast to Santa Catalina Island.
 Assuming a similar decrease in PCB compounds, the fallout may have averaged
 approximately 0.5 kg/day  on the  study area.

Data of the SCCWRP study  [14] indicated  average concentrations of Aroclor
1254 of 2.0 ygA or so for the JWPCP effluent during the period July 6-125
1973,  and 0.36 yg/£ for the Hyperion effluent during the week of June 18-24,
                                    87

-------
1973.  Daily composites  of the  JWPCP  effluent were  also  collected for this
study during the week of July 6-12,  1973.   These  samples  were  acidified and
extracted in a liquid-liquid extraction  apparatus for three  hours with hexane
followed by separation on an activated silica column.  The output on  the GLC
column was gross,  and the typical PCB patterns were  masked  by  large
quantities of unidentified compounds.  Further separation and  identification
procedures were not pursued.

 A grab  sample  of the JWPCP effluent was  taken in the afternoon of July  13,
 1973 and  diluted 17 times with clean sea water, extracted and analyzed  for
 PCB.   In  this  case Aroclor  1254 patterns were distinct on the GLC output and
 a concentration  of 6.5 yg/£ was indicated after correction for dilution and
 sea water background.  This was for only a single grab sample, but
 the analysis was deemed  accurate because of the unusual  care taken in the
 liquid-liquid  extraction  and separation procedures.  Using this  concentration
 and those reported in the SCCWRP study the wastewater effluent PCB mass
 emission  rate  was found  to  range from 3.3 to 9.6 kg/day to the study area,
 depending on whose data  were used.  These results indicate that the wastewater
 mass emission  rate of PCB was considerably greater than the rate of atmos-
 perhic fallout in the study  area.

 Four 4.5  a bulk  ocean water  samples were collected 0.5 m beneath the ocean
 surface at each  station  occupied in the 1973 survey.  The average results
 are compared with the surface screen samples in Table 20.

      Table 20.   COMPARISON  OF OCEAN WATER AND SURFACE CONCENTRATIONS
                       OF AROCLOR 1254:  JULY, 1973
Location
JWPCP outfalls
14 km NW of JWPCP
Control area
Bulk Samples
ygA
0.103b
0.025
0.018
Cloth Screen
Samples
yg/m2
4.8
2.1
1.2
yg/*a
32
13.7
8.0
Concentrating
Effect
310
540
440
      Assuming a sampling depth of 0.15 mm.
     \  diffuser.
                                    88

-------
 The  results  show that the PCB compounds  tended to concentrate strongly on
 the  ocean  surface.   The  concentrating  effect remained relatively constant
 throughout the  study area;  or in  other words,  the bulk and screen concen-
 trations of  the PCB  compounds  corresponded  fairly closely with each  other.
 In this regard  the PCB results  differed  greatly from those found for the
 fatty acids  to  be discussed subsequently.

 The  average  bulk water PCB concentration found over  the  L diffuser of the
 JWPCP outfalls  was approximately  50  times higher than that reported  by
 SCCWRP for bulk  samples  collected in the same  area at a  depth  of 3 m  in
 May  1973 [14].   The  reason for  such  a  wide  discrepancy is  unknown  except
 that a more  efficient hexane  extraction  technique was employed in  this
 study.

 The  approximate  computational methods  shown  in  Figure 26  and the data pre-
 sented in  Tables 19  and  20 were used to estimate  the  mass  of PCB present on
 the ocean  surface in the  surveys  of August-September  1971  and  July 1973.
 The mass computed was 24  and  6.4  kg  (as Aroclor 1254)5 respectively.   These
 results reflect  the  greater concentration of PCB  found everywhere in  the
 study area in the 1971 survey;  the cause being  unknown but possibly due to
 restrictions being placed on  the  use of PCB by  the manufacturers after 1970.
 The July 1973 results indicate  a  surface residence time in the order  of
 13 days if the  PCB compounds were  derived solely  from atmospheric fallout.

 The presence of significant atmospheric fallout makes it difficult to
 estimate the proportion  of surfaced pollution derived from the marine
 outfalls.   Both the bulk water  and surface screen results shown in Tables
 19 and 20 indicate that  the contribution of the marine outfalls must  have
 been significant, otherwise the appreciable decrease  in the PCB concentrations
with  distance from the outfalls could not be logically explained.  For this
 reason the PCB  results were taken as a second proof that some of the
substances collected by  the glass cloth screens were  derived from the
wastewater discharges.
                                     89

-------
HEM and Fatty Acids
The HEM and fatty acid results were much less amenable to analysis than were
the PCB or coliform results.  The variations were so great it was difficult
to judge if the differences found in average concentrations were truly signi-
ficant.  When a sufficient number of observations were taken, the differ-
ences proved significant as shown in Figure 29 for the HEM concentrations
found in the slick and non-slick areas of the control station in July 1973.

The HEM and fatty acid concentrations did decrease markedly with distance
from the JWPCP outfalls in the July 1973 survey as shown in Table 17.  No
such pronounced decrease was observed in the August-September 1971 survey.,
Again the causes of this are unknown.   In nearly all  cases the observed
HEM concentrations were surprisingly low in sea slick areas.

A free fatty acid occupies approximately 20.5 A2 of surface area in a stable
monolayer.  Palmitic acid, for example, would produce a surface concentration
of 2.08 mg/m2 as HEM under such circumstances.  Most of the observed HEM and
fatty acid concentrations were much lower than this.

To understand the role of wastewater fatty acids in the formation of sea
slicks, 2 a grab samples of the JWPCP effluent were collected on July 13,
1973 and added to an aluminum pan containing clean sea water.  The effluent
was added in sufficient quantity to give an overall sea water dilution of
18, about 5 times less than that being achieved over the outfall diffusers.
The depth of the diluted effluent in the pan was 17 cm and the pan had a
surface area of 0.224 m2.  The contents of the pan were agitated gently with
magnetic stirrers and six cloth screen samples were taken at approximately
20 minute intervals of time after an initial waiting period of about one
hour.  Bulk samples were taken from the undiluted effluent and from the pan
mixture after completion of the surface screening and acidified.  Surface
tension was also measured during the course of the experiments.  The results
of one such experience is presented in Table 21 and discussed in detail below,
with the results of all the experiments being essentially the same.
                                   90

-------
     O)
 0.8

 0.6
 0.5
 0.4-

 0.3 —


0.2 —















>


    o
    o
       0.1  _
       0.05 —
       0.04 -
                                                       O
                               X  X
                                   X
                            /
                             XyX
                  10
                 20    30   40   50  60  70   80     90   95    98
                  PERCENT EQUAL  TO  OR  LESS THAN
          Figure 29.   Cumulative  Frequency Distribution  of HEM Found in
                      Cloth  Screen Samples in  Control Area: July, 1973
The concentration of stearic acid  (saturated C18) was 5.8 mg/£ in the  bulk
effluent sample, or 8.1% of the total HEM.  This includes the salts  of the
acids because the sample was acidified before extraction.  The concentration
of the acid in the pan after dilution should have been approximately 0.32 mg/2,
instead of the 0.15 yg/ji observed.  It appears that some of the stearic
acid salts had migrated from the mixture before the onset of pan screening.
                                     91

-------
                  Table 21.   PAN DATA FOR JWPCP EFFLUENT
                      (grab  sample of July 13, 1973)
Type of sample
Bulk effluent3
(mg/AJ
Diluted bulka'b
in pan (mg/£)
Glass cloth0
samples (mg/m2)
HEM
71.4
2.36
1.49
FA
29
0.48
0.10
% of
HEM
41
20
6.7
Stearic acid
Cone.
5.8
0.15
0.030
% of
HEM
8.1
6.4
2.0
          'Acidified.
           Diluted 17:1 with clean sea water.
          cMeans for 6 cloth samples - cloths  not acidified.
The stearic acid was reduced to 6.4% of the HEM and the proportion of all  the
fatty acids in the HEM was reduced from an  initial  40% to 20% in the diluted
pan sample.  In other words, more than half of the  fatty acids had disappeared
from the diluted mixture.

After a period of one hour of waiting the surface tension had dropped by
more than 20 dynes/cm, far more than needed to depress capillary waves and
form sea slicks.  The glass cloth samples indicated an average surface concen-
tration of HEM of only 1.5 mg/m2,  and the  concentration of  stearic
acid was only 30 yg/m2.  By this time the acid comprised only 2% of the HEM
extracted from the glass cloths.  The glass cloths  were not  acidified prior
to extraction,  and the acid salts would not be extracted with the
hexane.  It is probable that appreciable quantities of the acid were missed
in this way, but exactly how much cannot be estimated from a mass balance
because some of the salts  went to the sides of the  pan as well as the water
surface, and because new film formed quickly after  a cloth sample was taken
from the water surface.  Indeed it appeared as if surface sampling could
have been continued indefinitely with significant HEM recovered until all
                                     92

-------
of the film forming substances had been removed from the pan.

It is possible that the method of sampling and analysis employed to measure
the surface films altered the fatty acid-salt relationships actually existing
at the air-water interface.   For example,  the cloths were air-dried prior  to
extraction and the sea salts would concentrate as  the water evaporated.  This
could produce additional fatty acid salts  depending on the pH  of the evaporat-
ing solution.

In summary, it appears that the ocean fatty acid salts were not extracted
from the screen samples and it may have been that  additional salting-out
occurred during the air drying stage.  The recovery of saturated long-chain
free fatty acids should be very small therefore, as indicated  by the results
of the effluent sampling experiments.

Figure 30 and Table 22 show the mean compositions  of the fatty acids found in
the screen samples collected during the July 1973  survey.   Palmitic acid
predominated in all areas sampled and stearic acid was relatively prevalent.
The concentrations of both of those acids  decreased grossly with distance
from the JWPCP outfalls, with stearic acid decreasing some 20-fold from
the outfalls to the control  area.  The proportion  of stearic acid found in
the HEM decreased from 1.4% over the outfalls to only 0.33% in the control
area.

   Table 22.  FATTY ACID COMPOSITION OF CLOTH SCREEN SAMPLES:  JULY, 1973a
                         (concentrations in yg/m2)
Location
JWPCP outfalls
14 km NW of JWPCP
Control area
HEM
910
410
210
FA
88
13.6
5.9
% of
HEM
9.6
3.3
2.8
Palmitic
acid
27
5.2
1.9
Stearic acid
Cone.
13
1.9
0.69
% of
HEM
1.4
0.46
0.33
     Weighted means of the data presented in  Table  17.
                                    93

-------
  100 —
o
O-
o
o
o
LU
a.
   50
                Ffflupnt.
                   '18
                        Y
                          et
                          o;
                         17
 Over
outfall
                                  -18
  JWPCP

14 km Nl
Control

  area
                                        17
                                                       17
                                                                 •16
                                       17
    0 —I
                                  '16
                  Cl6
                                  Cl5
                   15
                   'Ik
                   12
                                  Cl2
                  '16
                                                  '15
                                                  •1"+
                  '12
                                 Cl5
                                                                  12
      Figure 30.  Fatty Acid Composition  of Cloth Screen Samples: July, 1973

-------
 Bulk ocean water samples collected 0.5 m underneath  the  surface were  also
 analyzed for HEM and fatty acids with the average results  being shown in
 Table 23.  Those samples were acidified at the time  of collection.

   Table 23.  FATTY ACID COMPOSITION OF BULK OCEAN SAMPLES:  JULY,  1973a
                         (concentrations in
Locati on
JWPCP outfalls
(L diffuser only)
14 km NW of JWPCP
Control area
HEM
54
51
31
FA
6.4
9.1
3.3
% of
HEM
12
18
11
Palmitic
acid
2.7
3.6
1.1
Stearic acid
Cone.
0.92
0.92
M
% of
HEM
1.7
1.8
3.6
      Samples taken 0.5 m beneath ocean surface and acidified for preservation.

The table shows that the bulk water concentrations  of palmitic and stearic
acid were nearly constant in the study area during  the July 1973  survey.
Stearic acid had an average concentration of only 1  yg/£ or so, and palmitic
2.5 yg/£.  Even so, a water depth of only one or two meters would be suffi-
cient to produce a fatty acid slick at those concentrations if the acids
could attain the water surface.  A direct comparison cannot be made between
the acids found in the bulk water and in the screen samples because the bulk
samples were acidified and the screen samples were  not.

The change in the fatty acid composition of the cloth screen samples with
distance from the JWPCP outfalls in the July 1973 survey tended to parallel
that noted for the trawl particulates captured at the same time (Figures  19
and 30).  The major differences were a greater proportion of the  lighter
acids and a smaller proportion of unsaturated C18 acids  in the screen samples.
                                     95

-------
ORIGINS OF CLOTH SCREEN FATTY ACIDS

It appears that the fatty acids found in the unacidified and unsaponified
screen samples may have been derived primarily from micro-particulates rather
than surface film materials.  Some of the reasons for this belief are as
follows:  the surveys of 1971 showed that micro-particulates were profuse and
of significant volume, and that the coliform bacteria were distributed in a
spotty manner; the free fatty acid concentrations found at a given site were
highly variable but almost always too small  to form a sea slick; differences
in fatty acid concentrations between slick and non-slick areas were usually
relatively minor; the acidified bulk water palmitic and stearic acid concen-
trations were fairly constant in the study area, implying that their surface
concentrations (either free or as salts) should be reasonably uniform, but
the surface concentration of stearic acid decreased 20-fold from the JWPCP
outfalls to the control area; and the methods of analysis employed might make
any free stearic acid very scarce unless protected by being incorporated in
some type of micro-particulate.

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE SURFACE POLLUTION

The coliform bacteria and PCB analyses demonstrated clearly that some surface
wastewater pollution existed in the study area.   The PCB data could not be
used to trace that type of pollution because of interferences derived from
atmospheric fallout.  Only the fatty acid data could be used to obtain such
an estimate, and then only very crudely.

Of all the fatty acids recovered from the ocean surface stearic acid will
salt out the most readily and possibly be the most persistent in the marine
environment.  Assuming that this acid was derived primarily from wastewater
micro-particulates and that it was relatively inert inside the micro-parti-
culates, the mass of HEM of wastewater origin could be estimated grossly.
Obviously these assumptions are highly questionable.  For example, free
stearic acid could have been contained in the particulates falling from
the atmosphere but no information on such a  phenomenon was available.
                                    96

-------
Tables 21 and 22 show that the stearic acid proportion of the HEM decreased
from 2.0% in the effluent pan samples to 0.33% in the control area.   Assuming
that the stearic acid proportion would have been 2.0% over the JWPCP outfalls
if all of the HEM had been derived from wastewater micro-particulates,  the
following ratios of wastewater HEM to total HEM are observed.
      Table 24.  ESTIMATED CONCENTRATION OF HEM OF WASTEWATER ORIGINS
                          IN CLOTH SCREEN SAMPLES
Location
Over JWPCP outfalls
14 km NW of JWPCP
Control area
Proportion of
wastewater
origin
0.75
0.22
0.16
HEM (yg/m2)
Wastewater
origins
690
90
34
Background
230
320
177
Using this information and the computational  methods shown in Figure 26,  the
mass of HEM in the study area was estimated to be 312 kg, or about the same
order of magnitude as the HEM derived from the trawled particulates.

The surface materials collected by the cloth samplers proved of pollutional
significance in terms of the PCB compounds and coliform bacteria as well  as
the above.  All of the remarks made in Section V concerning the coliform
bacteria found in the trawled particulates apply here as well, only more  so,
because the particulates carrying the bacteria were much smaller (100 y or
less in size) and generally more dispersed on the ocean surface.

CONTROL OF SURFACE POLLUTION

The requirements of the California State Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean
Waters of California [7] specify that the concentration of hexane extractables
on the water surface shall not exceed 10 mg/m2 more than 50% of the time, nor
20 mg/m2 more than 10% of the time.  The methods of sampling and analysis
were not specified.  It was decided in Section V of this report that this
requirement was much too liberal to control adequately trawled grease and
                                    97

-------
wax particulates of sewage origins, and that it probably was intended to
control concentrations of surface film materials.

Table 15 shows that only one cloth sample out of the many taken had en HEM
concentration in excess of 10 mg/m2, and even a primary effluent diluted
17 times with sea water produced a surface concentration of only 1.49 mg/m2
after an hour of agitation (Table 21).   An HEM concentration of 10 mg/m2 can
be encountered only with:  1) a chance encounter with a large grease and
wax particulate, or 2) a duplex film.   It represents very gross surface
pollution indeed.

The HEM analysis, as performed in this  study, proved not to be a sensitive
measure of the pollution collected by the glass cloth screens.  Coliform
bacteria and massive concentrations of PCB compounds were found over the
outfalls at HEM concentrations ranging  from 0.9 to 3.9 mg/m2 on the average,
and a similar range in HEM concentration was observed in the control areas
(0.16 to 2.0 mg/m2).  Also, the HEM concentrations tended to vary grossly
from survey to survey, indicating either a poorly  developed method of
analysis or unknown seasonal effects.

It could be that further  development of analytical  methods
(cloth sample acidification, for example) would improve the reliability of
the HEM determination.  A few experiments on cloth acidification (data not
shown) indicated that the HEM may not be increased grossly, however, although
the fatty acids increased appreciably.

If the HEM analysis cannot be used to control the  type of pollution collected
by the cloth screens (except in the case of duplex films) then the question
remains as to what type of measure might be appropriate.  Free stearic acid
may indicate micro-particulate pollution but little experience has been
obtained with this measure and the analysis is not easily performed.  The
coliform bacteria analysis, however, is both definitive and easily performed
and the results can be judged to some extent in terms of their pollutional
significance.  Considering the accessibility of this type of pollution to the

                                     98

-------
public, it seems logical to restrict the surface bacteria  to  concentrations
of 1000 organisms/100 ma or less as total coliforms,  or 1000  organisms/m2
assuming a sampling depth of 0.10 mm with the  nylon netting screens.  This
might raise havoc with present ocean outfall  disposal  methods,  necessitating
the disinfection of the entire effluent prior to release even when  the
effluent plume is well submerged beneath the  ocean thermocline.   Also,  it
is not known if the bacteria present in the micro-particulates  would be
killed even with effluent disinfection, and it may be that even a disinfected
surfacing secondary effluent plume would not  meet this requirement.  For
these reasons the requirement suggested above for coliform bacteria is  offered
with considerable trepidation.

PCB concentration requirements could also be  established,  regardless of the
source of the compounds.  These investigators  are unable to judge what  an
environmentally safe level of such compounds  might be at the  ocean  surface.
Concentrations on the order of one mg/ji as Aroclor 1254 appear  excessive,
however, and such a level was approached in some samples collected  over the
Hyperion outfall in 1971.
                                     99

-------
                             VIII.   REFERENCES


 1.   The Ecology of the  Southern California Bight:   Implications  for Water
     Quality Management.   Final Report.   Southern California  Coastal Water
     Research Project.   TR 104.  March 1973.

 2.   Brooks, N.  H.   Conceptual Design of  Submarine Outfalls -  I.  Jet Diffusion
     Program VII, Water  Resources  Engineering Educational Series.  University
     of California, San  Francisco.  January 1970.

 3.   Newton, J.  R.   Factors  Affecting Slick Formation at Marine Sewage Out-
     falls.   Conference  on Pollution  Criteria for Estuaries,  University of
     Southampton,  England.   July  19, 1973.

 4.   Langmuir, I.  Surface Motion  of  Water Induced by Wind.   Science.  87_:
     119-123, 1938.

 5.   Standard Methods  for  the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 12th
     edition.  APHA, AWWA, WPCF, 1965.

 6.   Hahn, G. J., and  S. S.  Shapiro.  Statistical Models in Engineering.
     New York, John Wiley  and Sons, 1967.

 7.   Water Quality  Control Plan:   Ocean Waters of California.  State of
     California Water  Resources Control Board.  July 1972.

 8.   Determination  and Removal of  Floatable Material from Wastewater.
     Engineering Science,  Inc.  Public Health Service Contract 120-64,
     November 1965.

 9.   Selleck, R.  E., and R.  Carter.   Surface Phenomena Study.  Sanitary
     Engineering Research  Laboratory, University of  California, Berkeley.
     Report  No.  72-9.  June 1972.

10.   The Significance  and  Control  of  Wastewater Floatables in  Coastal Waters.
     Interim Report for  the Environmental Protection Agency.   Grant No.
     16070 FKO.   Sanitary  Engineering Research Laboratory, University of
     California,  Berkeley.  July 1971.

11.   Langmuir, I.  Fundamental Properties of Solids  and Liquids,  II.
     J.  American Chem. Soc.   _38:1858-1898, 1917.

12.   Adam, N. K.  The  Physics and  Chemistry of Surfaces.  Dover edition,
     New York, 2^-33,  1968.

13.   Rizwanul, H.,  D.  W. Schmedding,  and  V. H. Freed.  Aqueous Solubility,
     Adsorption,  and Vapor Behavior of Polychlorinated Biphenyl Arochlor  1254.
     Environmental  Science and Technology.  8:139-142, 1974.
                                   100

-------
14.   A Synoptic Survey of Chlorinated Hydrocarbon  Inputs  into  the  Southern
     California Bight.  Annual  Progress  Report  to  the  Environmental Protec-
     tion  Agency.   Southern  California Coastal  Water Research  Project, El
     Segundo,  California.  August  1973.

15.   Kawahara,  F.  K.   Microdetermination  of Pentafluorobenzyl  Ester Derivatives
     of Organic Acids  by Means  of  Electron Capture Gas Chromatography.
     Analytical  Chemistry.  jW:2073-2075, November 1968.

16.   Kawahara,  F.  K.   Gas  Chromatographic Analysis of Mercaptans ,  Phenols,
     and Organic Acids  in  Surface  Waters with Use  of Pentafluorobenzal
     Derivatives.   Environmental Science and Technology.  .5(3):235-239,
     March  1971.

17.   Carter, R.  C.  Surface Pollution  of Coastal Waters.  Thesis of University
     of California, Berkeley, pp.  151-158, 1973.

18.   Reynolds.  L.  M.   Polychlorobiphenyls (PCB's) and Their  Interferences
     with  Pesticides Residue Analysis.  Bulletin Environmental Contamination
     Toxicology.   1(3): 128-143,  1969.

19.   Veith, G.  D.   Environmental Chemistry of the Chlorobiphenyls  in the
     Milwaukee  River.   Theses of University of Wisconson, 1970.
                                     101

-------
                               IX.   GLOSSARY

Band Slicks - Long, narrow sea slicks running parallel  with each  other.

Fleatables or Flotage - All foreign substances collected from the water
surface by the sampling devices developed herein.

Grease - A general term used to designate the hexane extractables found  in
domestic wastewater or in a polluted sea slick.

Langmuir Cell - One pair of alternating (right and left) series of longitu-
dinal vortices at the water surface with their horizontal  axes parallel  to
the wind.  Generally such vortices  are produced at wind speeds in excess of
3.4 m/sec.

Micro-Particulates - Microscopic particulates captured  by the nylon netting
sampler.  Generally these particulates were less than 100 y in size.

Slick - Flotage so concentrated that capillary waves are dampened visibly
(or the surface tension is depressed significantly). A slick may contain
the surface film material proper, particulates, plankton, debris, froth,
foam, etc.

Surface Film - A collection of foreign molecules on the water surface.

Trawled Particulates - Particulates larger than approximately 0.5 mm in
diameter collected by the trawl net.
                                    102

-------
     APPENDIX A
MISCELLANEOUS TABLES
       103

-------
Table 25.  OCEAN CURRENTS AT HYPERION OUTFALL
     (6:20 to 7:14 a.m., April 7, 1971)
Depth
m
0-1
10
20
30
40
50
60
Speed
knots
0.30
0.42
0.30
0.25
0.15
0.07
0.12
Bearing
L_ °Mag.
360
180
320
300
Rotating
Reversing
90
                     104

-------
                                Table 26.  OCEAN CURRENTS IN AUGUST-SEPTEMBER 1971 SURVEY
o
en
Station 1
(7 to 8 a.m., Aug. 31)
Depth
m
1
10
15
20
30
40
50
55
Speed
knots
.30
.15
.15
.20
.20
.25
.10
-
Di recti on
true
N
SW
SW
SW
SW
SW
W
-
Station 2
(10 to 11 a.m.,
Sept. 1)
Speed
knots
.25
.30
.35
.15
.10
.20
.25
.10
Direction
true
W
W
W
NW
N
SW
SW
SW
Station 3b
(9:40 to 10:15
a.m. , Sept. 2)
Speed
knots
.20
.20
.20
.05
.20
.10
-
-
Direction
true
W
NW
E
NW
E
N
-
-
Station 4
(7:41 to 8:21
a.m., Sept. 3)
Speed
knots
.40
.20
.25
.20
.30
.20
.20
.10
Direction
true
NW
N
NW
N
N
N
NW
N

-------
           Table 27.  DESCRIPTION OF TRAWLED PARTICULATES: OVER OUTFALLS
                                (no./TOO m2  trawled)


Trawl No.
Sewage Types
Grease and wax
Seeds
Misc. tissue
Wood
Plastic
Fiber
Rubber
Unidentified
debris
Natural Types
Tar
Insects
Charcoal
Kelp
Eel grass
Surf grass
Sea lettuce
Pumi ce
Feathers
Eggs
Crab
Mysid
Siphonophore
Copepod
Sponge
Nauplius
Dinoflagellate
Barnacle
part. (?)
Eucarida
Di atom
Others9
Total
Station 1
IV- 7- 71
1

380
43
31
13
3.5
3.5


6.7

6.7
14

2.6
0.9
0.9

1.7




0.9
2.6
0.9

1.7

2.6



417
2

233
27
2.6
7
0.7
0.4


12

31
12

5.6
0.8
1.5
0.4


1.1
0.3
0.8
0.8
0.3








337
3

1270
209
69
31
11
3.1
1.8

6.1

52
62
1.2
63

3


0.6
1.2
1.2

0.6
2.5
1.8



4.9



1790
VIII-31-71
1

2.5


1.2

14


11

1.2
1.2

1.2




2.5










2.5


37
3

46
12


8
2.7


4.1


2.7






1.4












1.4
78
5

85
6.9
2.7

4.1





11.4
4.1






4.1











5.5
1.4
115
7

111
11


6.5





3.2





1.6













1.6
3.2
139
Station 4
IX-3-71
2

14
5.7


2.9
14




2.9


2.9




2.9










34


80
4

23
0.9


4.2
1.7


0.9

0.9


1.7
0.9








36





4.2

1.7
75
6

213
6
5
4
54
2
1

8.9

15
1
2
29


4






1








345
8

557
27


238





27


47


3.7












3.7


903
Pollen, fish, sea spiders,  etc.
                                       106

-------
            Table 28.  DESCRIPTION OF PARTICULATES:
                 3.7 KM N OF HYPERION  OUTFALL
                     (no./lOO m2  trawled)

Trawl No.
Sewage Types
Grease and wax
Seeds
Misc. tissue
Wood
Plastic
Fiber
Rubber
Unidentified
debris
Natural Types
Tar
Insects
Charcoal
Kelp
Eel grass
Surf grass
Pumi ce
Feathers
Eggs
Crab
Mys i d
Siphonophore
Copepod
Isopod
Hydroid
Sponge
Larvae
Barnacle
part. (?)
Others9
Total
IV-7-71
1

39
7
5.6
4.3

0.7


0.3

2.3
11
1
4
16

0.7





0.7







93
2

7
11
0.3
6.3
0.3
0.9


1.6

2.2
8.5

1.2

0.9
0.9

2.2

0.3
5
4.7



0.3

0.9
0.3
55
4

2
3
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.9


2.8

0.6
11




0.9


0.3
0.6
0.9
2.5
0.3
0.6
0.6
0.3

0.3

30
IX-1-71
1

38
5.5


1.8
2.7


0.9

5.5
4.6
0.9
21


0.9
1.8




1.8






2.7
88
3

23
4.4
1.3

0.6

0.6



1.3
1.9

1.9



0.6











0.6
36
5

77
25


1.4
4.1




4.7
1.4
0.7
34








0.7







149
7

90
69



1.5




2.9



















163
Pollen, fish, sea spiders,  etc.
                             107

-------
  Table 29.   DESCRIPTION OF PARTICULATES  COLLECTED:  CONTROL  AREA
                        (no./100 m2 trawled)

Trawl No.
Sewage Types
Grease and wax
Seeds
Misc. tissue
Wood
Plastic
Fiber
Unidentified
debris
Natural Types
Tar
Insects
Charcoal
Kelp
Eel grass
Surf grass
Sea lettuce
Red algae
Feathers
Eggs .
Crab
Mysid
Siphonophore
Copepod
Isopod
Hydroid
Sponge
Nauplius
Larvae
Barnacle
part. (?)
Coelenterata
Eucarida
Others3
Total
IV-8-71
1

0.5






0.5

0.5
1

16

0.5



1



0.5










20
.2

0.5
1.5
0.5
2
0.5
2.5

2.5

3
7.5

54

3.5

1

1.5
0.5

0.5

0.5
0.5

0.5

11



2.5
96
4

2.8




0.9



3.8
1.9

4.7


0.9
0.9




0.9
2.8
0.9

0.9

0.9





22
5








0.2

1.5
9.3

1







0.2
0.2





0.8
0.2




13
IX- 2- 71
1





0.5
0.5

0.3


0.3
0.3

0.8



0.3




0.3







0.8
0.3
1.3
5.4
3





0.3
0.6






1.9
0.6




0.3











1.6
0.6
1.0
7.0
5


0.4







3.9b
0.9







0.4




1.3







1.3
4.4
13
7










0.4
1.7


0.4
















0.4
7.0

9.9
 Pollen,  fish, spiders, etc.
'includes one piece  35 x  15 x 2 run in size,
                               108

-------
    APPENDIX B





ANALYTICAL METHODS
       109

-------
The ocean surface and bulk samples, and the 24-hour composited bulk effluent
samples, were processed as indicated in the scheme of analyses shown in
Figure 31.  Details of sample collection were presented in the appropriate
sections of the report.  The processing of samples collected by the various
samplers and the methods of analyses are presented below.

CLOTH SCREEN SAMPLES

The hexane extractables were obtained from the glass cloth screens by removing
the cloths from their containers and allowing them to air dry in a hood.
The cloths were then extracted for one hour in a standard soxhlet apparatus
and concentrated to 5 ma for transfer.  The residue was dried under nitrogen
at 40°C and weighed for hexane extractables.  This material was retained  for
subsequent fatty acid and chlorinated hydrocarbon analyses.

The coliform organisms, surface plankton, and micro-particulates were washed
from the nylon netting screens and filtered.  Sterile buffer solution
(150 ma} was used to wash the coliforms from the net screens and appropriate
aliquots were then filtered immediately through membrane filters and incubated
for later counting in the laboratory in accord with Standard Methods [5].
For the surface plankton and micro-particulate determinations, however,
the wash water was filtered sea water and the sampler washing procedure
was repeated twice with the filtered material being counted and identified
directly on the membrane filter.

FLOATING PARTICIPATES

The floating particulate samples were washed with distilled water, dried  at
35°C, and weighed.  For the first two surveys the particulates were counted
and identified directly under a dissecting microscope.  The particulates  were
then extracted with hexane for one hour in an alumina thimble in a standard
soxhlet apparatus.  The residual was then evaporated and weighed for hexane
extractables.
                                   110

-------
                                 SAMPLES
MICROSCOPIC
EXAMINATION
 10-100 X
                                                         MICROSCOPIC
                                                         EXAMINATION
                                                         400-430 X
Figure 31.  Analytical Approach to Characterizing Flotage and Bulk Samples
                                  m

-------
Participate samples selected for coliform organism analysis were processed
as soon as possible at dockside.   The participates were homogenized in a
sterile buffer solution of known volume,  and appropriate aliquots of the
homogenized mixture were filtered through membrane filters  in accord with
the procedures described in Standard Methods [5].

BULK WATER SAMPLES

The bulk sewage effluent and ocean samples were  acidified with  hydrochloric
acid to a pH between 1 and 2 and extracted in a  Pearson-Thomas  liquid-liquid
extraction apparatus [8].   The 1  liter sewage effluent samples  were extracted
for 3 hr and the 4 liter sea water samples were  extracted for 9 hr.  The
hexane extractables fraction of the bulk  samples was  concentrated in a tared
vial and weighed following hexane evaporation.

FATTY ACID ANALYSIS

The hexane extractables were characterized for their  fatty  acid composition
by applying the techniques of electron capture gas chromatography using the
novel esters prepared by reacting a-bromo-2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorotoluene
(BFT) with the fatty acids in the hexane  extract residues [15,16,17].

Weighing
The flasks containing the  hexane extracts from either soxhlet or liquid-
liquid extraction were concentrated to 1  or 2 tn£ using a rotary evaporator
with a water bath at 40°C  and an applied  vacuum  of 50 mm of mercury.  A
one gram, 1.3 ma, glass, tared vial was heated to  40°C.  The concentrated
sample was transferred to  the vial quantitatively  with hexane using a jet
of high purity nitrogen gas to assist in  the evaporation of the solvent in
the vial.  After cooling in a dessicator  the vial  was weighed to ± 10 pg.

Reaction
After weighing, the sample was quantitatively transferred back to its
original flask using 10 nrn hexane and dried on the rotary evaporator.  To

                                  112

-------
the flask were then added approximately  12 mg of  K2C03  (powdered and dried at
103 C) followed by 10 m£ of acetone( Sano Grade  ) and  0.1 nu of 5 percent
cx-bromo-2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorotoluene (BFT)  dissolved in absolute ethanol.
The flask was then connected to a condenser, the ground glass fitting wetted
with acetone, and the open end of the condenser  covered with aluminum foil.
The mixture was refluxed for one hour and cooled in a  20°C water bath for
approximately 10 minutes before disconnecting the flask from the condenser.
(Note:  Any water present in the sample grossly  inhibits this reaction.)
The acetone was removed on the rotary evaporator as before and the reacted
sample was then quantitatively transferred  with hexane to a 10 m£ volumetric
flask.

Chromatography
One micro-liter samples were then injected  into two gas chromatographs.
Model 1200 Varian Aerographs were employed  in the study, both equipped with
concentric tube electron capture detectors  ( H, 250 mCi).   Two different
analytical GLC columns were used, one in each chromatograph.  The columns
were 1/8 inch by 6 ft Pyrex  glass packed with 2.5 percent QF-1  on  Varaport
30 (80/100 mesh) and 5 percent QF-1 plus 3  percent DC 200  on Chromosorb  Q
(80/100 mesh).  The use of both columns permitted resolution of the fatty
acids into saturated and unsaturated components and provided presumptive evi-
dence for identification of compounds by comparison of retention times with
standards.  The carrier gas (purified N2) was maintained at approximately
50 mi min"1;  and the injector, column, and  foil temperatures were 230°C,
190°C, and 200°C, respectively, in both chromatographs.

CHLORINATED HYDROCARBON ANALYSES

The cleanup of hexane extracts for chlorinated hydrocarbon analysis  was
conducted with liquid chromatography in Florisil  as described by Reynolds
[18] and Veigh [19].  The media was purchased from Varian  Aerograph  in the
purified and  activated (at 650°C) form and  kept at 130°C prior to use.  The
column was 25 mm o.d. with a narrow discharge neck at the  bottom fitted
with hexane extracted glass wool and a 250 ma solvent reservoir at  the top.

                                  113

-------
Twenty grams of Fieri si 1  were added to the column  topped with  ten  grams  of
anhydrous sodium sulfate  for removal  of possible trace  water present  in
the extract.  The column  was washed with 70 ma hexane which  was  discarded,
followed by 20 ma hexane  used as a blank.   The extract  was  then  placed on
the column and eluted with 200 m£ hexane to recover DDE and PCB  primarily.
A second fraction was  then collected by eluting with 20 ma  of  20 percent
ethyl ether in hexane to  obtain DDT, dieldrin, and other more  polar chlorinated
hydrocarbons.  If the hexane extract had been reacted with  BFT,  these esters
were also eluted in the second fraction.  Control  showed that  PCB's were not
affected during the BFT reaction.

The eluants were then concentrated to volumes of 1 ma or 10 ma,  and one
micro-liter volumes were  injected into the same columns used for the  fatty
acid analysis.

STANDARDS

Fatty acids of 99+ percent purity were purchased from Applied  Science
Laboratories, Inc.  These were weighed and reacted with crbromo-2,3,4,5,6-
pentafluorotoluene,  Puriss Grade  (molecular weight 260.99) purchased from
Aldrich Chemical Compnay, Inc.   The completion of the  reaction  and recovery
of the ester was confirmed by comparison with known amounts of similar esters
supplied by Dr. Kawahara  of the Analytical Quality Control  Laboratory,
EPA  in Cincinnati, Ohio.

PCB standards for Aroolor  1242, 1248, 1254, and 1260 were  obtained from
Dr. Joseph Blazevich of the EPA Laboratory in Corvallis, Oregon.  Chlori-
nated insecticide standards were purchased from Varian  Aerograph.

CONTROLS

All hexane purchased was  of Nano Grade  quality and redistilled  in glass
before use.  Potassium hydroxide pellets were placed in the distilling flask.
All glassware was cleaned with a hot dichromate in sulfuric acid cleaning

                                   114

-------
solution, rinsed with distilled water, baked out at 103°C, and purged with
nitrogen gas while still hot.  Blanks were run frequently on reagents and
glassware for contamination monitoring.

The fiberglass cloth samplers were washed in distilled water and then air
dried in a hood.  The cloths were then soaked in a 60°C dichromate and acid
cleaning solution (heated initially only) for twenty four hours after which
they were removed, washed with tap water, rinsed with distilled water and
then air dried as before.  The cloths were then placed in a 4 liter bottle of
hexane with a few pellets of KOH in the bottom, a reflux condenser fitted
to the bottle's tapered glass joint and the hexane refluxed on a hot plate
for 4 hours.  The cloths were then extracted in soxhlet extractors, 2 to  a
soxhlet for 4 hours with hexane plus a few pellets of potassium hydroxide.
Fresh hexane, distilled in glass from pesticide quality hexane was then used
to extract the cloths for 2 more hours (no potassium hydroxide present).
The extracts from 6 soxhlets were then combined, dried, and weighed to deter-
mine the cleanliness of the extracted cloths.  The hexane residue was then
reacted with BFT and the fatty acids present determined by 6LC to determine
cloth background levels.
                                   115

-------
                      Hyperion, September 1, 1971
                       JWPCP, July 11, 1973




Figure 15.   Photographs of Sea Slicks Over Hyperion and JWPCP Outfalls
                                 117

-------
Figure. 18.   Rise of  Large Participates in the Vicinity of the  L Diffuser
                    of  the JWPCP Outfalls:  July,  1973
  £«
  4-> OJ
  C i.
  o 
                                                                            (O
                                                                            3
                                                                            O
                                                   (O
                                                   0.
                                                                            01
                                                                            o>
                                                                            O

                                                                            cz
                                                                            O
                                                                            o
                                                                            Q.
                                                                            |

                                                                            CD

-------
 SELECTED WATER
 RESOURCES ABSTRACTS

 INPUT TRANSACTION FORM
/. Report No.
                                                        2,
                   W
    "The Significance and Control of Wastewater Floatables
     in Coastal Waters."
     Selleck, Robert E., Lloyd W. Bracewell, and Ralf Carter
     Sanitary Engineering Research Laboratory
     College of Engineering & School of Public Health
     University of California, Berkeley

  12.  Sp ~>nsorin Organ?-ation
                                                                 5.  Report Date
                    8. Performing Organ:z»tton
                      Report No.
                                                                    1BA025
                       800373
                   IS.  Type <.-/ Repo/c and
                       Period Covered
     Environmental Protection Agency Report No. EPA 660/3-74-016,  January
             Significance of flotage derived from submerged primary effluent plumes  in
the Southern California Bight is evaluated in terms of three components:   particulates  >^
0.5 mm in size, particulates j< 0.1 mm in size, and surface film materials.  The  sampling
methods utilized to collect the flotage from the surface are described  in  detail.  The
surface film and micro-particulates were captured by fabric screen samplers developed
during the course of the study.
     It was found that the large particulates penetrated the ocean thermocline and gath-
ered on the surface in profusion.  The grease and wax portions of the particulates could
be measured reliably with hexane extraction, with the mass of HEM of sewage origin being
in the order of a metric ton on the water surface within the study area.   Such particu-
lates contained considerable numbers of coliform bacteria but little PCB compounds or
pesticides.
     The surface film materials and/or micro-particulates contained significant  concen-
trations of coliform organisms and PCB compounds, but not pesticides.   The HEM derived
from this type of flotage may have amounted to 300 kg on the water surface within the
study area in July 1973.  Regulations for controlling the concentration of flotage on
the ocean surface are suggested after considerable discussion.
     This report was submitted by the Sanitary Engineering Research Laboratory of the
University of California, Berkeley, in fulfillment of Grant No. R-800373,  under  the  spon-
sorship of the Office of Research & Development of the Environmental Protection  Agency.
     Water pollution, ocean outfalls, surface floatables, surface films,  surface  slicks,
     waste water disposal, collection methodology
     California, ocean outfalls, surface pollution
                       05A,  05B,  05C
19. Security Class.
(Repot :)
*S. Se..'trityC;..ss.
(Page)
21. No. of
Pages
::3. Pm«

Send To :

WATER RESOURCES SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION CENTER
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
WASHINGTON. D. C. 2O24O

-------