United States
                   Environmental Protection
                   Agency
  Office of Solid Waste
  and Emergency
  Response
Publication 9200.0-15FS
November 1993
    AEPA     Superfund  Administrative
                    Improvements:
                    Reinventing Superfund
Superfund Revitalization Office
                   Quick Reference Fact Sheet
      The Superfund Administrative Improvements initiatives are a comprehensive package of administra-
tive changes designed to make significant improvements to the Superfund program prior to Superfund reau-
thurization. Announced in June 1993, these initiatives have had an immediate impact on improving the pace,
cost and fairness of Superfund. This fact sheet describes the themes, background and each initiative of the
Administrative Improvements effort. This fact sheet also describes major activities which have been completed
during the first three months of implementation, as well as those that are currently underway and planned to
be completed over the next 12 months.
                   ADMINISTRATIVE IMPROVEMENT THEMES
           Enhance Enforcement Fairness and Reduce Transaction Costs

           Enhance Cleanup Effectiveness and Consistency

           Enhance Meaningful Public Involvement

           Enhance States' Role

           Continue Ongoing Management and Enforcement Initiatives
OVERVIEW

In April of 1993; the Administrator saw an opportu-
nity to evaluate the Superfund program and build on
the first 12 years of program experience. The Admin-
istrative Improvements Task Force was established
to examine options for making administrative
changes that could improve Superfund. This Task
Force operates under the direction of the Superfund
Steering Committee, chaired by EPA's Deputy Ad-
ministrator. The Task Force developed a series of rec-
ommendations for administrative improvements to
the program' which could be accomplished without
statutory or regulatory amendments.
On June 23,1993, the Administrator announced a
series of nine new initiatives and reemphasized eight
ongoing initiatives that would enhance enforcement
fairness and reduce transaction costs, accHerate the
pace of cleanups, increase public involvement and
enhance the role of the States in Superfund These ini-
tiatives are fully described in the Superfund Attmin&-
tratrve Improvements Final Report.

Currently all ten Regions and all Headquarter)
Superfund offices are engaged in the implementation
of Administrative Improvements initiative*.

-------
 ENHANCE ENFORCEMENTFAIRNESS AND REDUCE TRANSACTION COSTS
 Initiative ll

 Greater Use of Allocation Tools
 •  Identified 11 sites for demonstration of A DR and
    initiated the first three demonstration sites
 •  Identifying additional ADR demonstration sites
    and will initiate at least 20 demonstration sites
 •  Will identify and begin the use of binding allo-
    cation at approximately three pilot sites
' Contact:  David Batson (202) 260-3173
 Initiative 2l
 Foster More Settlements with Small Volume Waste
 Contributors
 •   Completed 43 de minimis settlements at 30 sites
     with over 1,500 responsible parties in FY93
 •   Issued guidance on streamlining de minimis
     settlements and guidance on "de micromis"
     settlements
 •   Issued communications strategy for assisting de
     minimis and "de micromis" parties
 •   Identified candidate sites for at least 38 addi-
     tional de minimis. including "de micromis,"
     settlements for FY94 using the new criteria, and
     are continuing to identify additional  sites
 •   Will complete at least 35  de minimis, including
     'de micromis," settlements using the new crite-
     ria in FY94
 Contacts:  Gary Worthinan (703) 603-8951
              Patterson (202) 260-3091
Initiative 3t
Greater Fairness for Owners of Superfund Sites
•  Issued Supplemental Federal Lien guidance
•   Will  determine  if EPA should clarify the
    requirements of "all appropriate inquiry" under
    CERCLA, and clarify the requirements, if appro-
    priate
•   Will issue supplemental prospective purchaser
             and a modeJrprospecrwe,,puj;cbaser
                                                  Contacts:  Gary Worthman (703) 603-8951
                                                           Ken Patterson (202)260-3091
Initiative 4?
Evaluate Mixed Funding Policy
•  Identified candidates and selected pilot sites for
    evaluating the use of mixed handing
•  Evaluated the mixed funding options and the
    potential cost of mixed funding
•  Explored    options   for   stt'eamtrmng
    preauthorization procedures and requirements
•   Will initiate mixed funding pilot sites and evalu-
    ate results
•   Based on the pilot results, will recommend-mea-
    sures to streamline preauthorization procedures
    and determine whether to revise the   mixed
    funding policy
Contact:   Gary Worthman (703) 603-8951
                                       Related Documents

                   De Minimis guidance. OSWER Directive 9834.7-1 D, July 30,1993
                   "De Micromis" guidance, OSWER Directive 9834.17, July 30, 1993
                   Federal Lien guidance. OSWER Directive 9832.12-la, July 29, 1993
                   Mixed Funding Evjluatiun Report: The Potential Costs of Orphan Shares," OSVVF.R, Sept. 1993
                                   LEGEND
                                   •   =   item complete
                                   •   =   under development

-------
                                 ENHANCE STATE ROLE

              Initiative  9:
              "State Deferral" of Certain Site Categories

              •   Initiated State deferral pilots at 5 sites
              !»'•   Monitoring pilots and addressing key implementation questions
              *   Considering up to 50 additional pilots in 7 states
              •   VVill issue interim guidance on State deferral

              Contact: Murray Nai'ton <7ltf) 603-8795
                               CONTINUING INITIATIVES
Over the past several years, EPA has implemented a
series of reforms to improve aspects of the Superfund
program. These reforms, listed below, have had a
significant impact on Superfund and are important
to the overall goals of the program. These ongoing
initiatives were included with the new Admmistra-
ive Improvements to recognize their.continued vi-
ta I itv.
10
11
     Full Implementation of the Superfund Accel-
     erated Cleanup Model (SA'CM)
     National Priorities List (NPl.) Construction
     Completions

12  Effective Contracts Management

13  Enforcement First

14  Accelerated Cleanup at Base Closures

15  Promote Use of Innovative Technology
     Compliance Monitoting

1 /  Improve the Effectiveness of Cost Recovery
Major Accomplishments:

•  Full implementation of SACM  ,
•  Completed construction at a total of 217 NPL
    sites by the end of FY93
•  Issued remedial Independent Government Cost
    Estimation guidance
•  Identified 16 bases for accelerated cleanup dem-
    onstration projects
•  Concluded agreements with DoD and  DoE on
    use of innovative technology at two site*.
•  Developed Cost Recovery Targeting Report th.it
    presents the recoverable past costs, efforts, to n--
    cover past costs, and the statute of limitations tor
    each site

-------
           ENHANCE CLEANUP EFFECTIVENESS AND CONSISTENCY
Initiative 5'.

Streamline and Expedite the Cleanup Process

•  Issued presumptive remedy guidance tor munici-
    pal landfills and sites with volatile organic com-
    pounds in soils, and identified 7 sites for use of
    the presumptive remedies

•  Completed study of pervasiveness of dense non-
    aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs) at  N'PL sites

•  Issued new  technical and enforcement guidance
    tor addressing DN APLsat Superfund and RCRA
    sites
•   Identifying  additional sites for use of presump-
    tive remedies

•   Preparing land use policy

•   Will issue additional presumptive remedy guid-
    ance  on groundwater  pump and  treat,
    woodtreater, PCB, coal gasification and  grain .
    storage sites, and initiate additional demonstra-
    tion sites

•   Will develop standardized remedial design .speci-
    fications

LvuMrf:   Bffsv Shaw (703) 603-9034
                                                  Initiative 6:
                                                   Develop Soil Screening Levels
                                                  •  Developed and issued draft soil screening lev els
                                                      for 30 common contaminants (screening!level.c > to
                                                      be used on a pilot basis only)
                                                  •   Will develop soil screening levels for 60 ad di-
                                                      tional compounds
                                                  •   Will test the use of the soil screening fevels at pil ot
                                                      sites
                                                  Contact:
          Bruce Means (703) 603-8848
                                                                Related
                                                    General presumptive remedies, OSWER Directive
                                                    9355.0-47F5, Sept. 1993
                                                    Presumptive remedies: municipal landfills, OSWER Direc-
                                                    tive 9355.0-49F5, Sept. 1993-"
                                                    Presumptive remedies: VOCs in soils, OSWER Directive
                                                    9355. 0-4SFS, Sept. 1993
                                                    Pervasiveness of DNAPLs at NPL sites, OSWER Directive
                                                    9355.4-13, Sept. 1.993
                                                    "Guidance for Evaluating the Technical Impracticability of
                                                    Ground-Water Restoration," OSWER Directive 9234 2 25
                                                    "Draft Soil Screening Levels Guidance," Quick Roferenci1
                                                    Factsheet, OSWER Sept. 1993
                 ENHANCE MEANINGFUL PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
Initiative 7l
Implement an Environmental Justice Strategy

•   Analyzed the impact of 158 NfPL sites on mmor-
    ity and disadvantaged communities
•   Issued simplified Technical Assistance Grant
    application materials

•   Identified 21 Regional demonstration projects for
    environmental justice action
•   Conducted Superfund Training Institute for
    teachers
•   Conducting an in-depth analysisof environmen-
    tal justice case-studies
•   Will initiate and evaluate Regional demonstra-
    tion projects
•   Will develop and issue an environmental justice
    strategy for future Superfund sites

•   Will publish Technical Assistance Grant materi-
    als in other languages
Ci'iifiii-f:   Marsha Liniisey (202) 260-bb26
Initiative 8t
Early and More Effective Community Involvement
•  Identified 16 sites to demonstrate innovative
    community involvement techniques
•   Establishing site-specific Citizen Advisorv
    Boards  at several  Department  of Energy
    Superfund sites and will establish Citizen Advi-
    sory Boards at some Departmentof Defense site-,
•   Will prepare and implement a new Supvrtund
    public participation pfan
Contact:   Bonnie Chiles (703) 603-8868
              Related Dpcumeht

   Preliminary Analysis of Population Demographies
  August 1993

-------