v>EPA
            United States
            Environmental Protection
            Agency
          Office of
          Solid Waste and
          Emergency Response
DIRECTIVE NUMBER:
TlTlp- State Regulation of Radioactive Waste



APPROVAL DATE:  2-21-84

EFFECTIVE DATE:  2-21-84

ORIGINATING OFFICE:

0 FINAL

D DRAFT

 STATUS:



REFERENCE (other documents):
 OSWER      OSWER     OSWER
fE   DIRECTIVE   DIRECTIVE

-------
 PART 271   SUBPART A -  FINAL AUTHORIZATION                     DOC:  9541.01(84)


 Key Words:     Radioactive Waste, Equivalency

 Regulations:   RCRA 1004(27) 40 CFR 261.4(a)(4)

 Subject:       State Regulation of Radioactive Waste

 Addressee:     Ernesta  B. Barnes, Regional Administrator, Region X

 Originator:    Lee  M. Thomas, Assistant Administrator

 Source Doc:    #9541^1(84)

 Date:          2-21-84

 Summary:

      RCRA regulation of radioactive wastes and the Agency's position on what
 State control  to  require for the purpose of obtaining authorization are as follows:

      o  Source, spent  nuclear, or by-product material as defined by the Atomic-
        Energy Act  of  1954.  The RCRA statute and regulations exclude these   ^
        materials  from the definition of solid waste.  Therefore, EPA does not
        regulate these wastes as hazardous and cannot require States to do so.

     o  Radioactive wastes outside of the source, spent nuclear, or by-product
        universes.  EPA has the authority to"regulate these wastes if they are
        hazardous.  EPA and authorized States must regulate these wastes when
        they are listed-or when they exhibit any of the characteristics identified
        in Part 261.   Authorized States must provide authority equivalent to
        EPA1 s for these wastes, although this authority need not be Che State's
        hazardous waste authority.

     o  "Mixed" wastes (i.e., those containing both source, spent nuclear, or
        by-product material and RCRA hazardous waste)..  EPA's authority to.
        regulate these wastes is unclear.  The Agency is working-to determine
        its authority over these wastes and will make public its official deter-
        mination.   If  EPA determines that it has authority over these wastes
        under RCRA, States will have the time frame provided in 40 CFR 271.21(e)
        to amend; their programs to include authority over these wastes.
     The eas^»t-.way for a State to ensure equivalency for the purpose of
obtaining authorization is to adopt the same exclusionary language  that  RCRA
contains.   ispr^;..-

     Naturally-occurring radioactive wastes associated with mining  or the
processing of oils are excluded from regulation under Subtitle C of  RCRA.
Uranium mill tailings are also excluded from RCRA because the Uranium Mill
Tailings Radiation Control Act defined them as a byproduct material.   States
are currently not required to regulate scintillation media wastes since  these
are a species of mixed waste.• EPA urges authorized States to work  with  the
responsible Federal or State agency in the State to assure that  these wastes
are handled in a manner that adequately protects human health and the environ-
ment.

-------
                                                             954L.01 (34
                            FE3 I I 1384

 MFMOPANPllM                           "                               £•
                                                                     *•
 SUHJKCT:  State Regulation  of  Padioactive Waste
           /signed/" Lee M. Thomas                                        £
 PP.O*:      Lee  M.  Thonas                                            .  .-
           Assistant  Administrator                                    ^
                                                                     3
                                                                     a
 TO:        Ernesta f«.  Barnes                                         -
           Regional Administrator, Pegicn X
                                                                     s;
                                                                     *
     This  memorandum  is  in  response  to  your  September  30,  19>»3,
 memorandum requesting Guidance on State regulation  of  radioactive
 wastr?.   I  have  discussed  the Agency's authority  to  regulate
 radioactive waste under  RCPA with Headquarters'  Offices  of Radia-
 tion Programs,  Enforcement  and Compliance Monitoring,  Federal
 Activities, Waste Programs  Fnforcement, r.eneral  Counsel, and Solid ~
 Ka«»te.   I  have  concluded  that  the issues of  Federal regulation
 of radioactive  wastes under PCPA and the Agency's position on  -.
 State control ov»r radioactive wastes for the purpose  of receiving
juthorization under RCRA  should he resolved, for the. time  being,
~as outlined below.

     Section 1004(2?) of  RCPA  and the regulations at 40  CFR  261.4
 (a)(4) exclude  fron the definition of solid  waste (and therefore
 from the definition of hazardous was^e) source,  speciftl  nuclear,
 or byproduct rraterial as  defined by  the Atoric Fnergy  Act  of 1954.1
 FPA does not regulate these wastes as hazardous; thus  we cannot
 require  the States to reaulate the*».  Although there are no  PC*A
wastes listed because they  are radioactive,  nor  is.radioactivity  a
 PCPA characteristic at the  present tine, there are  sore  radioactive
 wastes that are outside the source,  special  nuclear, or  byproduct
 universe that F?A does have authority,'  under RC^A,  to.  regulate  if
 they are hazardous.  These  include naturally-occurring raaiopncli^es
 and accelerator-produced  radioisotopes  (radium and  berylliur-7  are
examples).  EPA and authorized. States r»ust regulate these  waste?
when they  are listed or when they exhibit any of the characteristic?
 identified in Part 2fil, Subpart C.   For States,  the authority  to
 regulate these wastes -need  not necessarily be the hazardous  waste
authority**^ It could, for instance,  be  another State authority  that
controls atl. radioactive  waste,  of  course that  authority, and  t*°
mechanise  implementincj it, must be equivalent to PCPA.
1 The definition* of these materials  (see  Attachment)  are specific
  in that Act and the wastes are reoulated by  the  Nuclear Recjularory
  Commission (NRC) or an NP.C Agreement State.

-------
                               -2-
        y facility that receives pr»A ha*ardeus  waste must ^
 RCPA *tandarcs and operate under either  Interir status or a
 permit.  "*turally-oceurring and accelerator-produced rar, toacr iv*
 was ten d«»ternined to be tan7*»r*ous tinker  PCP&  ««ust  QO to a *C!?v
 facility.  It i* worth notinn r**t, altbour*  these wastes are
 not pre sent ly regulated by anyone at the Federal  level for their
 radio activity (s^ne States do rec?ul*te the»«) , PT.A requires
     (and authorize* States) recui*te ther when  t*ey exhibit
           waste characteristic,
          reco<:nires tb*t t^cr*> ar«« potr» wamte  Ptreer-s  that
certain  hcrh  source,  special nuclear, or byproduct  waferial
PC^A  ha^flrdoi-s wastes.  FPA ' s authority f> recjulate the^*» "
waj»te« unrer  »CVA is  not entirely cle»ar, and the  universe and _
.generator.*  of tbe*e waste? have net fceen fully identified.   w»»
are workino to determine FPA's leqal authority over these wastes
antf we are  working  with the nepartrent rf Fnergy  (C<>D  and  the
Nuclear  Pequlatory  Co^iri35sion (Nt»r) to identify both the  wastes
a"hd appropriate and effective tt«f.fl«ur«»« fnr rana^in«3 then,  onec
a final  c*et*rnination about these issue* has been reached,  FP*
will  announce it put'l iely.  if TPA d^terr-tn^-  that  thecft  waste«,
which are currently reculafed un?*er th«» Mo»-ir mercy  Act,  are
•subject  to  regulation under fhe Fe^pr^l Fr^. pro^ra-^,  autherl??^
st*trs will have the  ti«*e fr?»n«? provided in 4f. CV>  271.21(e)  tr
attend their proorars  to berot»« enxiivalcrt .  "ntil that  fir-,*,  r&-\
will  not recrulre the  State." to recju]*te any waste "trear-  that
ha« both harardeus  ar«^ source, «p«cini nurlear, or  byproduct
corpon«»nts  as  a requirerent for authorisation.

     The ain-p.lejtf way for e State to satisfy these  reauirercnt-s
IP to adopt the «a«"t»  exclusionary language found  in eC?A.  An •
excJusler of  all radioactive wastes is too broad  tn s«ti*fy  t^i«
requirement since «o»"« har^rrtous wastes that *re  not source,
special  mjcle/»r, or hyrrcduet material •"*»/ thereby  be  exclu^pr
fror* contrc^S^tf a Sta^te does have »uch bro^d  exclusionary
lancjuace?   Attorne  funeral mur.t full  exlain how  t*os*»
               Attorney funeral mur.t fully explain  how
excluded waf|tit«"8  will  be regulated In t> manner  equivalent to
th^ F'edera^gro-Trar.   At such five as we clarify our [x^sin irr
on the f ix«Vjfvva«!tei* discussed aoove, we will b^» able tr- pr^vi.-v
you and the  States with additional guidance.   V-e do, hrwev*>r,
urv-;<» the Regions  and  States to review tcqet^cr the State/*
authoriti*«  over  radioactive waste? to ensurft  that they are
properly mannqed  so a« to provide raxirur protection to huwar
health and the environr-^nt .  This review c^n b^» especially
beneficial to  those States 9**Vin;j Congressional apprcv?.! under
s^ctirr 4 of the  Low  [,«vel t:«ste Policy Act o£ 19^(> (F.L. °'-5?3)
to *-nter into  regional compacts for !--anar:incj radioactive waste*.

-------
                              -3-


      t.*t n*jjr*«r<>r>? specifically  to  the questions ar:! concern?
 you raised in your F»et-orandur!.  First,  by defining i" this peno-
 randyr the radioactive* wastes that FT'.*  and. th«» crafts r»u«t now
 regulate, I brllev«» I have answered  ycur questions 1, 2, and  4a.
 In  response t« question 3, you are correct that naturally-oo.cisrr ire
 radioactive wastes associated with mining or the processing of
 ores are i-re«»ntly excluded fror  regulation und»»r surtitle C  of
 POP*.   sinllarly, State* do not have to regulate the»* a« hazarrtcu«.
     crv«»r.%c:*» of urar.iirr ntil t»ilinr;« if a Pffp^r^fp ratter, *s
  i*» 'jraniurt »«ill TMlinq;*; BM'lijition  Control Act ^efin*»rt thn-  ««
  hypro^uct. ™»t«»rial.  Tailings are, therefore, exclu^«rt fron
      ?ir»c«» the ncint illation i*o«iia  wastes <«iscus*i»rt in question
arc  a secies of nixed we«t.«» (i.e., wastes corr^lnin^ both,
special  nuclear, or byproclucf nat^rial  an^ PCR*i hazarrloua waste),
State? will not. row he reuuireri  to  re»-jvlat« the»-.  The S^C  chose
nr.t  to renulat«» thor because it  *»terrine«i that the level of
radioactivity is so low «s to net enrtancer horan health or  th«»
e/wircp-'onf (i.e., less than O.n* wicrociiries p«r grap» of h
o*r c?r^on-l4).  As wfrh o.ther rtxer* waster., however, we are
wif.h  the HPC «n^ the POP to assure  tbit  tnese w«ste« are handler
in *  rranner that will acJcnuately protect t^«? crvironnert
public he»lth.  t-e ur-Te autnorlzert  States to worV in a c
rarner wit*", t^.o respon* l^le ac;ercy  (F^r^eral or St^tn) ir> the  >t*
tc similarly assure adr-quate protection  to buTan health and  the
er.v ir«nn»«nt fron the haiards of  t^esc wz«te«.

      Tn  response to quo«tior. *r, th#» «tocV.pi le-* rariiur» wastes ir
Mort«on<»rv , Mat'-ara, were rc'tly neerlles frr>m hos;-it«l* an
not  PC?A ^fljrar'ious wastes.  PV «<;ree'-cnr. wit^ the- Food and
idiririsfrat ion , FPA srore-* those wa«re«  *t the »*ont'5O«*»ry
until they co«»lr1 to dispose'* of  pronerly.'  They werr> all dlspoff.r'
of ar .radirr^ct ive waate« in the  cor-rerci.nl, J-rv— l?vel radioactive
                site in Han f ord ,  lash,
     I trust  thi0*' «e~or*Rdu^ provides  you with tKe ?
sought.  V^lire,  of caurse, available  to discus* this with  you
further afeftnv- ti^».
cc:
     Gene  f ucero,
     *-illie»r  Picker son, r-c.\
     Joserh Freed ran, (TV
                Con, OKCW
               *idr i nistr^tora,
hcc: H^rsr^oup  v.aste Branch' Chief ?,  Weciicns T-y
                     nrarch

-------