v>EPA
             United States
             Environmental Protection
             Agency
           Office of
           Solid Waste and
           Emergency Response
DIRECTIVE NUMBER: 954i.o6<85>

TITLE: ^e Qj ycai G0verniients in operating Hazardous Waste Prograis


APPROVAL DATE: 5-20^35

EFFECTIVE DATE: 5-20-85

ORIGINATING OFFICE:

0 FINAL

D DRAFT

 STATUS:



REFERENCE (other documents):
 OSWER     OSWER     OSWER
fE   DIRECTIVE   DIRECTIVE

-------
PART 271  SUBPART A - FINAL AUTHORIZATION
                                                DOC:  9541.06(85)
Key Words:

Regulations:

Subject:

Addressee:


Originator:

Source Doc:

Date:

Summary:
Local Governments, Authorized States
Role of Local Governments in Operating Hazardous Waste Programs
           • ğ  •  •   	 "~                '*"      ..--       .     ....
Gregory Lie,'Senior Environmentalist, Department of Environment
and Energy, 320 Washington Ave., South Hopkins, MN 55343-8486

John H. Skinner, Director, Office of Solid Waste

#9541.06(85)

5-20-85
     While the ultimate responsibility for inspection and enforcement of  the
RCRA program remains with the State agency authorized to operate in lieu  of
EPA, States may share with local governments responsibility  for enforcing the  -
State program.  States wanting to share workload must submit certain information
to EPA for review and approval. This can be done as part of  the States'
authorization process or as a revision to the authorized State program.

-------
                                                            9541.06 (85)

                                                                  ğ — 3

 Dr. Gregory  Lie               MAY 20 1935                       < f f
 Senior  Environmentalist   i               I                         £ ^ ^
 Department of  Environment'and Energy     I                         a. u> vc
 320 Washington Avenue, South                                        ~
 Hopkins,  Minnesota   55343-8486                                    \TT
                                                              	*-. o -
            	    	   	•' - •            ..,-.-•               y, .
 Dear  Dr.  Lie:      .-• -	                                    \.s.
                                                                  oo a
                                                                  uğ t
      This letter  is  in response  to your  April  11 letter             £.
 concerning whether Hennepin County could be delegated respon-       =>
 sibility  to  conduct  Inspections  and take enforcement actions
 in lieu of the authorized State  hazardous waste program.            Si
                                                                    •3
      Under $3006  of  RCRA, EPA may authorize qualified States        7
 to administer  and enforce the RCRA program within the State         ^'
 in lieu of EPA administering and enforcing the Federal program.     a,
 The regulations which you cite and the preamble to those            o*
 regulations  (45 PR 33379, May 19, 1980)  make it quite clear         £,
 that  EPA  may autHorize only State-level  agencies.  However,         \
 as I  stated  during our meeting,  this does not  preclude local        \
 government involvement in State  hazardous waste programs.       ~    "

      Local governments with their own ordinances may, of
 course, administer those ordinances, including conducting
 inspections  and taking enforcement actions.  They can provide
 assistance to  hazardous waste handlers and are an excellent
 source  of information for State  hazardous waste agencies.

      Under certain circumstances, local  governments could
 also  take a more  active role.  A local government could
 conduct inspections  on the State's behalf, and the State
 agency  could defer to local government enforcement of the
 State laws if  the State agency were convinced  that the
 local response was timely and adequate.  A State wanting
 to share  its workload with local government  in this manner
 would have to  identify the local government  agencies to be
 involved  and describe the functions to be carried out by
 local government, the procedures for coordination and
 interaction, the resources to be devoted by  local govern-
ment, and the State's procedures for oversight of local
government.   This must occur as  part of  the  State's

-------
                             -2-

authorization process.  If a State were to decide to involve
local government subsequent to authorization, i't would be
necessary for the State to provide this information to
EPA for review and approval as a revision to the State's
authorized program.	

     Thus, while EPA could not delegate authority to local
governments, the State may share with local governments the
responsibility for enforcing the State program.  However,
the ultimate responsibility for inspection and enforcement
remains with the State agency authorized to operate in lieu
of EPA.

     I hope this interpretation clarifies our authority under
RCRA with regard to delegation to local governments.  if yov
have any further questions, please feel free to contact rae
again.

                              Sincerely,
                              John H. Skinner, Director
                              Office of Solid Waste
bcc:  Lillian Bagus, Region V

-------