Unittd States
           Environmental Protection
           Agency
           Office of
           Solid Waste and
           Emergency Response
   v>EPA
DIRECTIVE NUMBER:  9832*12-
TITLE:  Guidance on Federal Superfund Liens
                       September 22, 1987
                       September 22, 1987
APPROVAL DATE:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORIGINATING OFFICE. OECM
O FINAL
Q DRAFT
 LEVEL OF DRAFT
   £3 A — Signed by AA or OAA
   OB — Signed by Office Director
   O C — Review & Comment
REFERENCE (other documents):
  OSWER     OSWER     OSWER
VE   DIRECTIVE   DIRECTIVE   Dl

-------
            United States
            Environmental Protection
              Of/ice of
              Solid Waste and
              Emergency Response
  vvEPA
 DIRECTIVE NUMBER:  9832*12-

 TITLE:   Guidance on Federal Superfund Liens



 APPROVAL DATE:  September 22, 1987

 EFFECTIVE DATE:  SePtember 22> 1987

 ORIGINATING OFFICE:  OECM

 D FINAL

 Q DRAFT

  LEVEL OF DRAFT

    C3 A — Signed by AA or DAA
    D 8 — Signed by Office Director
    DC — Review & Comment

REFERENCE (other documents):
S WER       OSWER       OSWER
   DIRECTIVE    DIRECTIVE    Dl

-------
                              nrtOu tates nvronmental rotection Agency
                                    Washington. DC 20460


                  QSWER Directive Initiation Request
                                                              1. Directive Number



                                                                9832.12
                                   2. Originator Information
      Name of Contact Person

        Allen Danzigv,
                               Mail Code

                               LE 134S
Office

 OECM
Telephone Cede

 382-2845
      3. Title
         Guidance on Fedesal Superfund Liens
      4. Summary of Directive (include brief statement of purpose)        , ,  ,    . ,        ..u   „= nf f^a-r-al 1-ipn
-------
          UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                         WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460

                               SEP 22 IS8T
                                                               of
                                                          ENf ORCEMf.NT AND
                                                         COMPLIANCE MONITQHIfcG
MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT:  Guidance on Federal Superfund Liens

FROM:     Thomas L. Adams, Jr.
          Assistant
TO:       Regional Administrators, Regions  I-X
          Regional Counsels, Regions I-X
          Directors, Waste Management Division,
            Regions I-X


     The purpose of this memorandum is  to establish guidance on
the use of federal liens to enhance Superfund cost recovery.
Section 107(f) of the Superfund Amendments  and Reauthorization
Act of 1986 ("SARA"), adds a new Section 107(1) to CERCLA, which
provides for the establishment of a federal  lien in favor of the
United States upon property which is the subject of a removal or
remedial action.

     This guidance provides: (1.) analysis of statutory issues
regarding the nature and scope of the lien,  (2) policy on filing
a federal lien to support a cost recovery action, and (3) proce-
dures for filing a notice of lien and taking an in rem action to
recover the costs of a lien.  Attached  to the guTcTance is an
example of a notice of a Superfund lien.

I.  STATUTORY BACKGROUND AND ISSUES

     A.  Property Covered by Lien

     Sectt<^t07(l) of CERCLA provides  that all costs and damages
for which-aggerson is liable to the United  States in a cost
recovery aefcionr shall constitute a lien in  favor of the United
States upoivall real property and rights to such property which
(1) belong to such person and (2) are subject to or affected by
a removal or remedial action.  The lien applies to -all property
owned by the PRP upon which response action has been taken, not
just the portion of the property directly affected by cleanup
activities.  The House Judiciary Committee  Report on the lien

-------
                                                               9832.12
                               -  2  -
 provision in H.R.  2817  (p.  18),  which was  enacted as part of
 SARA,  states that  "the  lien should  apply to  the title to the
 entire property on which  the response action was taken."  At the
 same time,  the Report notes that "it is not  intended to extend
 the lien to the title of  other property held by the responsible
 party."   Id.

     The lien provision is  designed to facilitate the United States'
 recovery of response costs  and prevent windfalls.  "A statutory
 lien would  allow the Federal Government to recover the enhanced
 value  of the  property and thus prevent the owner from realizing a
 windfall from fund cleanup  and restoration activities."  131 Cong.
 Rec. S11580 (Statement  of Sen. Stafford) (September 17, 1985).
 See also House Energy and Commerce  Report on H.R. 2817, p. 140,
 indicating  that one of  Congress1  primary purposes in enacting
 the lien provision was  to prevent unjust enrichment.

     B.   Duration  and Effect of  Lien

     The federal lien arises "at  the later of the following:
 (A)  the  time  costs  are  first incurred by the United States with
 respect  to  a  response action under  [SARA, or] (B) the time that
 the person  is  provided  (by  certified or registered mail) written'
 notice of potential liability."   (Emphasis added) (§107(1)(2)) .
 EPA may  send  out two different types of notice letters to PRPs.
 The first,  a  general notice letter, will be  sent early in the
 process  notifying  the recipient  that he or she has been identified
 as  a party  who  may  be responsible for cleanup of the site or for
 the costs of  cleanup.   In addition, the Agency may send a sub-
 sequent  "special" notice which will invoke and commence the
 settlement  procedures in Section  122 of SARA.  The first of those
 letters  will  satisfy the notice of potential liability required
 for the  federal lien to arise, assuming that it does give the PRP
 notice of potential liability for cleanup of costs,  and is for-
 warded by certified or registered mail.

     It  is  EPA's position that the  lien provision applies to costs
 incurred prior  to and after passage of SARA.  The lien also applies
 to  all future costs incurred at the site.  The lien continues
 "until ther.-liability for the costs  (or a judgment against the
person arising  out  of such  liability) is satisfied or becomes
unenforceable through operation of the statute of limitations
provided in section 113." (5107(1)(2))

     C.  Priority of Federal Lien In Relation to Other Property
         Liens
 •»
     The federal lien is "subject to the rights of any purchaser,
holder of a security interest, or judgment lien creditor whose
 interest is perfected under  applicable State law before notice of

-------
                                                              ^832,12
                               -  6  -
      Where the State has  designated  an office, such as a County
 recording office,  the  lien  should be filed  in that office.  This
 will  likely be the same office where State  Superfund liens are
 filed or  where general real property liens, e.g. mechanic's liens,
 are filed.   "If the State has not by law designated one office for
 the receipt of such notices of liens, the notice shall be filed in
 the office  of  the  clerk of  the United States district court for the
 district  in which  the real  property  is located." (5107(1)(3))

      Where  there is any doubt as to  the designated State office,
 the lien  should be filed  both in the office of the clerk of the
 United States  district court for the district in which the real
 property  is located and in  the most  appropriate local office for
 recording property interests.  Filing in the appropriate local
 office is important, since  parties with an  interest in the property
 are more  likely to review liens in the local office than in federal
 district  court.

 IV.   IN REM ACTIONS FOR RECOVERING COSTS CONSTITUTING THE LIEN

      Under  Section 107(1)(4), "[t]he costs  constituting the lien
 may be recovered in an action in rem in the United States district
 court for the  district in whicTT~the  removal or remedial action is
 occurring or has occurred."  An in rem action is an action against
 the property of  the PRP.  In order to institute a proceeding in rem,
 the property must  "be actually or constructively within the reacH
 of the court."  36  Am. Jur.  2d Forfeitures and Penalties S2B (1968).
 By contrast, the typical  cost recovery action is an in personatn
 action against  the PRP.

      In rem actions should  be considered where the litigation team
 believes  that  an action to  recover costs covered by the lien will
 enhance its  efforts to recover all costs incurred in a response
 action.   Such  actions will  be particularly  useful where the pro-
 perty  constitutes  a significant asset of the PRP, and where the
 government  is  having difficulty reaching an expeditious cost
 recovery  settlement.  The in rem action, which will seek an order
 directing sale of  the property,^/ should generally be combined with
 an in  personam action for costs.  Before bringing an in rem action,
 the regional^office should  consider  the amount of the claim, the
            :•"-&.
            .
2/  An in rem action may be delayed by an automatic stay, obtained
    in a bankruptcy proceeding, which serves to stay, "any act to
create, perfect, or enforce any lien against property of the
estate."  (Emphasis added) 11 U.S.C. S362(a)(4).  The automatic
stay also prohibits perfection of a lien, through filing notice
of the lien, against a bankruptcy debtor.

-------
                                                                9832.12
                                -  3  -
 the federal lien has  been  filed  [by  EPAJ."   (§107(1)(3))  Thus, the
 unfiled  federal lien  is  subordinate  to  rights that are perfected
 under applicable State  law before EPA files  notice of its federal
 Superfund  lien.   After  EPA files notice of the federal lien, the
 United States  establishes  its priority  ahead of known and potential
 purchasers,  holders of  security  interests, and judgment lien credi-
 tors  whose interests  have  not been perfected.

      During  deliberation on the Superfund amendments, Congress
 considered a provision  in  H.R. 2005  [S. 51]  which provided for
 constructive notice of  an  EPA lien.  Under that provision, if EPA
 failed to  file its notice  of lien in a  timely fashion, the EPA
 lien  would nonetheless have had priority over a third party lien
 which was  filed  prior in time if the third party had or reasonably
 should have  had  actual knowledge that EPA had incurred costs
 which would  have given  rise to a lien.  See  Environment and Public
 Works Report on  S. 51, p.  45.  Thus, since this provision was
 ultimately deleted from  the Act, EPA must file its lien in order
 to  achieve priority over any other secured parties, and cannot rely
 on  constructive  notice.

      D.  State Superfund Liens

      Most  States  have passed "Superfund" statutes similar to the
 federal  law.   However, a State Superfund lien only applies to
 response work  paid for by  a State.  Some of  the State statutes,
 such  as  those  in  Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Arkansas
 and Tennessee, contain "superlien" provisions which provide that
 any expenditures  made pursuant to the statute constitute a first
 priority lien upon the real property of a hazardous waste dis-
 charger.    Several other States provide  that  expenditures from the
 hazardous  waste  fund will  constitute a  lien  in favor of the State,
 although not a first-priority lien.

 II.   POLICY  ON FILING FEDERAL LIENS IN  COST-RECOVERY ACTIONS

      EPA has the  authority to file notice of a lien on any real
property where Superfund expenditures have been made.  Regional
offices shouidi carefully evaluate the value  of filing notice of a
 lien whenev«|^the Agency has identified a landowner as a potenti-
ally  liabl«§j|§«ty under Section 107.  Filing of notice of the
federal liem^will be particularly beneficial to the government's
efforts to recover costs in a subsequent Section 107 action in the
following  situations:

           (1) the property is the chief or the substantial
              asset of the PRP;

           (2) the property has substantial monetary value;

-------
                                                               ' o

                              - 4 -
           (3) there is a likelihood that the defendant owner
              nay file for bankruptcy.  See Revised Hazardous
              Waste Bankruptcy Guidance, Office of Enforcement
              and Compliance Monitoring, May 23, 1986;

           (4) the value of the property will increase signi-
              ficantly as a result of the removal or remedial
              work; or

           (5) the PRP plans to sell the property.

Regional offices should not file notice where it appears that
the defendant satisfies the elements of the innocent landowner
defense pursuant to Section 107(b)(3).

     Where existing perfected non-Superfund liens on the property
equal or exceed the value of the property as enhanced by the
Superfund expenditures, it may not be worthwhile to file notice of
the federal lien.  However, in some cases, a foreclosing party,
such as a bank, may take over the property, and EPA may believe
that the foreclosing party is liable under Section 107.  See United
States v. Maryland Bank and Trust Co.. 632 F. Supp. 573 (D. Md.
1986).  In such cases, EPA should file a lien as to the foreclosing
party after foreclosure and after other acts creating liability
have taken place.

     Pursuant to Section 545(2) of the Bankruptcy Code, a lien
unperfected as cf the time of filing of the bankruptcy petition
will be invalidated by the bankruptcy trustee.  Thus, where there
is a likelihood of a bankruptcy filing, notice of the Superfund
lien should be filed as early as possible.  Finally, note that
filing notice of the lien is not subject to pre-enforceraent review
of the liability of the landowner for the response costs.J/

III.  PROCEDURES FOR FILING LIENS

     Notice of the federal lien should be filed at the time that
the owner ia provided notice of potential liability.  By this time,
the lien wilt, have arisen since EPA will have incurred costs, e.g..
I/   Courts have rejected claims that owners are entitled to notice
     and hearing prior to filing of the lien.  In Spielman Fond.
Inc. v. Hanson's Inc., 379 F. Supp. 997 (D. Ariz.) (3 judge court),
summarily aff'd. 4TT U.S. 901 (1974), the court held that filing of
a mechanic's lien did not amount to a taking of significant property
without due process, since it did not prohibit the transfer of title,
Subsequent court decisions have followed this holding.  See, e.g.,
B & P Development v. Walker. 420 F. Supp. 704 (W.D. Pa. T9T6).

-------
                                                               ^832.1 2
                                - 5  -
 in conducting a PRP search.  The  government's priority will relate
 back to the date that  the notice  of  the  lien was filed.  See
 Uniform Commercial  Code, 59-312(5)(a).   Unlike some State Superfund
 lien provisions. Section 107 does not establish a deadline by which
 notice must be filed.

      A.   Preparing  the Notice

      Regional enforcement personnel  should refer to State
 requirements  for filing notice of the lien.  We encourage the
 Regions  to  work with State Attorney  General Offices to assure
 that the Regions accurately interpret State law, and to consult
 with OECM and DOJ in determining  whether to file notice of the
 lien.

      Notice should  generally include:  (1) the name of the property
 owner,  (2)  a  precise legal description of the property on which the
 lien will arise,  (3) an explanation  by the Regional official of the
 basis  for the lien,  (4) the address  of the Regional Administrator
 or other Regional official delegated authority to sign notices of
 liens, and  (5)  a.provision that the  lien shall remain until all
 liability is  satisfied.  The notice  should cite CERCLA Section
 107(1) and  be notarized with the  Agency  seal.

      Notice may  also include such information as:  (1) the amount
 of fund  expenditures upon which the  lien is claimed and (2) a
 description of  labor performed and materials supplied, including
 dates.   However,  since the statute does  not require specification
 of costs, the notice should clarify  that, where response work is
 ongoing,  the  amount  of the lien will increase as the costs incurred
 increase.   The property description  to be included in the notice of
 the  lien should  be  the legal description (i.e., metes and bounds,
 or lot,  block and subdivision) rather than a general post office or
 street address.   We  have attached an example of a notice of a
 federal  lien.

     Under  the recent SARA delegation, the Regional Administrator
has  been  delegated  authority to sign the notice of filed lien.
The  Regional Administrator may redelegate this authority at his/her
discretion.

     B.

     To  eseHIPiish its priority among other secured parties and
creditors,  EPA must  file notice of the lien "in the appropriate
office within the State (or county or other governmental sub-
division),  as designated by State law, in which the real property
subject  to  the lien  is located."  ($107(1)(3))

-------
                                                          583LI2
                              - 7 -
 condition  of  the site after the response action and the likely
 marketability of,the site.  Note that an in rem action will require
 the  same elements of proof as any cost recovery action.

      Section  107(1)(4) further states that "[njothing in this
 subsection shall affect the right of the United States to bring an
 action against any person to recover all costs and damages for
 which such person is liable under subsection (a) of this section."
 Thus, where the government seeks to enforce the federal lien, it is
 not  precluded from recovering the balance of its response costs
 directly from the landowner or any other liable party.3/

 DISCLAIMER

      This  memorandum and any internal procedures adopted for its
 implementation are intended solely as guidance for employees of the
 U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency.  They do not constitute
 rulemaking by the Agency and may not be relied upon to create a
 right or a benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law
 or in equity, by any person.  The Agency may take action at variance
 with  this  memorandum or its internal implementing procedures.   j

 Attachment                                    •        .
3/  Moreover, after EPA obtains a judgment, it should consider
    using state judgment lien provisions, which may* cover all real
property of the debtor.

-------
                                                                            S632J2
                               NOTICE OF FEDERAL LIEN
      NOTICE IS HERESY GIVEN by the United States of America that  it holds a lien on
 the lands and premises described below situated in the State of Washington,
 as provided by Section 107 (f) of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization
 Act of 1986 (SARA).  Public Law No. 99-499. amending the Comprehensive  Enviromental
 Response. Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCIA), 42 U.S.C.  $9601 et
 se£. . co secure Che  payment to the United States of all costs and damages covered
 by that Section for  which Western Processing Company, foe. and Carat J. Nieuwenhuis
 (and the marital community composed of himself and his wife) are  liable to the
 United States xrxder  Section 107(a) of CERCLA as amended.  The lien for uhich this
 instrument gives notice exists in favor of the United States upon all  real property
 and rights to such property vhich belong to said persons and are.  have been, or will
 be.  subject to.  or affected by, raooval and remedial actions as defined by federal
 law.  at or near 7215 South 196th in the City of Kent, County of King,  State of
 Washington, including the following, described land:

           That portion of the Southeast Quarter (S.E. 1/4) of the -
           Northwest  Quarter (N.W. 1/4) of Section One (1). Township
           Twenty-Two (22)  North, Range Four (4) East, Willanette
           Meridian,  lying Westerly of the Puget Sound Electric
           rigfrt-of-way less  than North Thirty (30) feet of Drainage
           Ditch No.  One (1). containing 12.9 acres more or less.                 -

      This .statutory  lien  exists and continues until the liability for  such costaJ
 and damages (or for  any decree or judgement against such persons  arising out of  *
 such liability)  is satisfied or becomes unenforceable through: the operation of the
 statute of limitations as provided by Section 113 of Public Law 99-499.

      IN WITNESS  ^HEREOF,  the United States has caused this instrument  to be executed
 through the (Orated/ j^ates Enviromental Protection Agency, and its attorney, in his
 officials-capacity as Regional Counsel of the United States Environmental Protection
Dated^at
                                        day of
                                                f-
                                                \
                                                       f
                                                       '
                                       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and
                                       UNITED STATES ENVIROWENTAL
                                       PROTECTION AGENCY
United States Ol^Sttica)
State of
County of
                        )sa
                                                                  , F ? ' /^
                                  VA^James R. Moore
                                  •F*  Regional Counsel
                                         S. EPA,  Region 10
   t-.     ;tb.is' £ j day of      S A/U Afll»'  .  \9
   Qri-rte- * phev unders igned Notary, Janes R. Moore,
                                                      7 .  there appeared personally
                                                     own to me to be the Regional
                      States Environmental Protection Agency,  Region 10, and he
                £ he signed the foregoing NOTICE OF FEDERAL HEN  in a representative
           ;*he Jree and voluntary act and deed of the United  States and its said
                    and purposes therein mentioned.  GIVEN under  my hand and official
                 year first stated above. "
My Camission Expires
                       . I  I  _
                     ;/^  y/ yC-

                      ~
                                                                    _
                                       NOTAKY FUBLICn and tor  te  State
                                       of Washington residing at Seattle

-------