6 EPA
              Unittd State*
              Environmental Protection
              Agency
Off ice of
Solid Waste end
Emergency Responae
               DIRECTIVE NUMBER:
                            9840.0
               TITLE:
                    FY 1986 SUPERFUND COMPREHENSIVE ACCOMPLISHMENTS
                    PLAN
               APPROVAL DATE:  DECEMBER 24, 1984

               EFFECTIVE DATE:  DECEMBER 24, 1984

               ORIGINATING OFFICE: QWPE

               (3FINAL

               D DRAFT

                STATUS:



               REFERENCE (other documents):
  OS WER      OS \NER     OS WER
VE   DIRECTIVE   DIRECTIVE   Dl

-------
  tf% f->r%A
  O t PA
               United States Environmental Protection Agency
                       Washington. DC 20460
       OSWER Directive Initiation Re<
                          Originator Information
                                                Interim Directive Numb
                                                9840.0
Title
    F¥ 1986 Superfund Comprehensive Accomplishments Plan
Summary of Directive
      This  document sets  forth procedures for planning enforcement
      and fund-financed activity in FY  1986.
      Topics addressed include priority activities, operating
      procedures,  targets for activities, interactions between
      fund-financed and enforcement activities  and enforcement
  Key words: SCAP, planning, targets,  enforcement
              activities,  case budget,  priorities
Type of Directive (Manual. Policy Directive. Announcement, etc.)
      Guidance
                                                   Status
                                                      D Draft
                                                      &J Final
                                                      LJ New
                                                      LJ Revision
Does this Directive Supersede Previous Directives)?   |  | Yes
If "Yes" to Either Question. What Directive (number, titlel
                              I  |  No   Does It Supplement Previous Directive)*)'   LJ Yes   |	I
Review Plan
   D AA-OSWER
   D OERR
   D OSW
D OUST
D OWPE
LJ Regions
D OECM
D OGC
D OPPE
Other (Specify!
This Request Meets OSWER Directives System Format
Signature of Lead Office Dir
          .  a.
Signature of OSWER Directives Officer
                                                                 Date

-------
         UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                     .VASHINGTON 3.C. 20J'0
                                                       OSWER # 9840.0
                         DEC 2 4 1984

MEMORANDUM
            /•
SUBJECT:  FY 1 936 .Supfrf und Comprehensive  Accomplishments Plan

FROM :     L^f^T^^/^-
          Assistant  Acministretor
          /
TO:       Regional Administrators,  Regions I  -  X


     Attached is the FY  1986 Superfund  Comprehensive  Accomplish-
ments Plan  (SCAP), including preliminary targets  for  components
of the Strategic Planning  and  Management System (SPMS).   The
SCAP complements the Agency's  FY 1986  Operating Guidance and
Regional  site management planning process  by  providing a struc-
ture through which Headquarters  and  the Regions can  identify and
al locate  FY  1986 resources for  removal , remedial ,  enforcement,
community relations, laboratory  support, and  other Superfund
program components.

     Regiona  submissions  of the preliminary  FY 1986  SCAP are
due to Headquarters on  January  30,  1985.   After a  brief  review
period, Headquarters will  get  back  to  each Region  and  discuss
its proposed plan.  Negotiations on  the preliminary  SCAP must be
completed by March 1, 1985.  Revisions to  the preliminary SCAP
will  be considered during  June,  July,  and  August.   The final
FY 1986 SCAP will be established  in  early  September,  1985.
Timelines showing the Agency's and  OSWER's FY 1986 planning
processes are attached.

     FY 1986 marks the  second  year  for  which  we have  fully   inte-
grated the planning of all aspects  of  the  Superfund  program*
The FY 1986 SCAP is  similar in most  respects  to that  developed
for FY 1985.  At this point, participants  should  be  familiar with
the reporting procedures and requirements.  Any questions that
do occur  should be addressed to  the  normal  Headquarter's contact
for the program area involved.   Also,  we have scheduled  some

-------
                                                   OSWER f 9840.0

*•' -ne 2" T *e Januarv Sjser-*jno Bran.cf. Criers' meeting to d'scuss
any concerns that a r i se .   ! wish TO emp na s i 29 Tne following
poinrs made in tne SCAP:

   • The scheaule for developing the FY 1986 SCAP has been cnangec
     from that used for FY 1985 in order to integrate OSWER1s
     planning process into the Agency's overall planning process,
     particularly operating plan development and Regional FTE
     distributions.  The preliminary SCAP will be used as input
     to the Regional  workload model which is due to the Comptroller
     on March 1, 1985.  It is difficult to adjust this distribution
     once it is made.  Consequently, you should pay close attenticr
     to your preliminary submission.            "  	

   o We worked with staff  from the lead Superfund Regions on
     revisions to the SPMS measures at a meeting on the Agency's
     Operating Guidance in early December 1984.  The SPMS
     measures and definitions will be final i zed by June 30, 1985.
     The SCAP targets proposed in thi s document are not  based on
     the definitions developed at that meeting.  When definitions
     are finalized, SPMS targets will be adjusted as necessary.
     Separate SCAP targets are proposed for Fund-financed and
     enforcement actions.  These targets are  negotiable .

   • Site stabilization continues to be the program's highest
     priority.  You should consider both actual and potential
     releases when evaluating potential removal actions, partic-
     ularly at National  Priorities List sites.

   « We do not want to delay any project from moving directly
     tnrough the Record of Decision to design or from design to
     remedial  action.  We  urge your personal  attention  to ensure
     that projects meet the schedules agreed  to by you  and your
     States as set forth in your Site Management Plans.   In
     addition, sound management oversight must be extended to
     prevent unwarranted project cost growrh.  To expedite these
     decisions, as you know, we are currently developing a
     proposal  to delegate  substantial ROD decision-making to
     Regional  Administrators by February 1, 1985.

   • Administrative and judicial enforcement  actions  should be
     taken whenever possible.  This  includes  actions taken  under
     CERCLA S106 and  §107, and RCRA  §3008 and  §3013.  A major
     area of emphasis will be initiation of §106 judicial actions
     at enforcement-lead sites where focused  feasibility  studies
     have been completed.    ^
                                            t
   • Me are continuing to  look for ways to  improve planning for
     total laboratory support needs, including the contract  1
     oratory program.   Your ESD Director should already have,
     will soon be receiving, guidance on a  revised estimating
     nique for FY 1985  needs.  You are asked  to provide summary"
•or

*

-------
                              - 3 -
                                                      OSWER fc 9840.0

      FY  1986 projections based on that guidance.  You should  al so
      note  that  we  will  be refining and revising this format for
      FY  1985 as problems arise.   The final  FY 1986 SCAP wiM  use
      the  Improved  format.

    •  The RCRA Dioxin  Regulations have been signed  and issued.
      They  will  be  effective in six months.  A CERCLA/RCRA Work
      Group  has  been establ i shed  to deal  with the devel opment  of
      an  implementation  plan for  this regulation.  A preliminary
      draft  of the  plan  has identified several  CERCLA actions  which
      have  re source implications, especially related to the other
      isomers of  d i ox i n  is sue.   The plan  will  be provided to the
      Regions in  January and  it may have  an effect on the FY 1986
      SCAP.   There  w i i i  be sere impact on the FY 1985 SCA? cs  well.

    «  Now that the  S-uperfund  program is beginning to mature, in-
      creased  emphasis must be  placed on  our ongoing workload
      and longer  term  planning.  The FY 1986 SCAP includes
      requirements  for projecting completed remedial activities
      in FY  1986.  and for projecting new and ongoing remedial
      projects (including certain enforcement activities) for
      FY 1987.  These  projections will  have significant  impacts
      on such areas as FY 1986  Regional resource allocations and
      FY 1987  budget development.

    o  It is  important  that we place priority on deletion of. sites
      from the NPL.    The targets should  ref I ect your ' a sse ssment of
      the maximum number of  sites for which the technical  information
      i s adequate for  del i sting.

      Finally, the  revised  t i me table for  development of the FY
1986  SCAP dictates that we  begin work on the SCAP prior,to
establishment of the  President's budget.  The targets contained
in the SCAP  are  based on the Agency's request to OMB.  OMB
Circular No.  A-10  states that  budgetary  material should not be
disclosed in any form prior  to transmittal  to Congress of the
President's  request.  Accordingly, at this point the attached
SCAP  should  not  be released  outside of the Agency.  This does
not apply to Region-specific information needed for coordination
with  the States  or other Federal  agencies.

      Preparation of the SCAP is  an important step in effectively
managing the  Superfund  program.   I urge  you to take the time  to
familiarize  yourself  with the  priorities and  requirements in
the SCAP.

Attachments
                      •

cc:   Director,   Office  of  Emergency and  Remedial Response, Region  II
      Director,   Hazardous Waste  Management Division, Region III
      Directors,  Air and  Waste  Management Division, Regions IV, VI,
                 V I I and  V I I I
      Directors,  Waste Management Division, Regions I and V
      Director,   Toxic and  Waste  Management Division, Region  IX
      Directors,  ESD,  Regions I,  V, VI, VII, VIII and X

-------
o
S AGtNCY FY  1986  PLANNING  PROCESS
a\
=»*:
                      10/11/M
                                        l/JIf/M
                                                                                                                                 tit in
                  Agency !••«•»•
                  rcll UU»i l«r
                         |>toe»«»
rr«*i»M
IM tt*U «l
       lor
                                            <«••«
                                                                                                                                    «Mlf*l«
                                                                                            1*
   OSWER  FY   1986  PLANNING  PROCESS
                                       12/ll/M
                                                           BS/lt/M
                                                                                                                                 I/I/M
    •ukalt Sl»»
OMB* ••tell*
1*1 4t»lt el
••I4»M* lot
                                            4l*ll
                                    STM5 •*
                    •>••*« an twr«)
                    •nd ficllBliurf
                    srws
                                                                           Ul 4r«li
                                                                           M by ••» IOM
                                                                                        la
                                                                           fr*ll •!*••; SIWS
                                                                           OHMl !•••«•)
                                                                                                           (|M| trait
                                                                                                           (lac*i petal Ian
                                                                                                                             AM K*
                                                                                                                                                 •••IMM Ml
                                                                                                                                                 n •* WAT
                                                         (July. l*8«)
                                                                                (•/II/M)
                                                                                                                                                  (•/ll/M)

-------
J
f
D
r»
                                                                                 a/10/U
                                                                             ••rly »/•»
          auka>ll
  appeala on
  Mai»loa4 aaalyal*
  la Comptroller
STHS a*aau»a
                                                        r««U*4 (TMf
                                                                                       II
                                                                                                                                                               !•
                                                                                                     I/IO/M
                                                                                                                                                         •ally •/•»
                           tt 4iall al
                               •utalll*^
                          to m k»
NO flualltca SfltS
•aaauici and
••I 1*11 lew* Mlih
                                                                                                   raaaaack la
                       ra*laa4
                       n M SCAf
final n M
K*r la HO
ay laiiloM





OSMU aokailla
4iall STMS
lar«*ta. kaaa4
aa n «4 SCAT
•A/OSWI
aaara>aa ft M
K«r. aa4
avaalla llaal
srm targala
10 OMC
                                                                                                    (9/10/B4)
                                       

-------
                                   OSWER * 9840./O
           SUPERFUNO




COMPQEHENS!VE ACCOM0-:SHM£N~S




             PLAN-




            '= t 1936

-------
                                                     OSNER $ 9840..0
      DESCRIPTION OF  THE  PLAN
      DEVELOPMENT  OF  THE  COMPREHENSIVE  ACCOMPLISHMENTS
      PLAN  .......................... 2

 IV.   UPDATING AND REVIEWING  THE  PLAN:   Amending the FY 1986
      SCAP-  and t ne SCA? Review  ................ 3

      REMOVAL/ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM ............... 3

      REMEDIAL/ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM

      A . Preliminary  Assessments  and  S;+e Inspections ..... *
      B. Site Classification  ana  Responsible
            Darfy Searches  ............... . .  .5
      C . Re Tied i a I  I n vs s* i gat i on/Fea si b i • i *y 3* ui ! e s  ..... 5
      0. Remedial  Design  and  Remeoia!  Action  ......... 5
      E. judicial  Enforcement  Actions for Private Response .  . 7.
      F. Cost Recovery Actions  ................ 1
      3. De ! e> i on  ......  .  .  .  .  . • ......... .  .7
                       .

V!l.  PROGR-  SUPPORT DIRECTIVES  .

      A. Laboratory Analysis  Program  Support  ......... 7
      3. Case Budgets   ........  ............ 3
      C. FIT Track ing   .................... 9
VIII. D I OX I,. ACTIVITIES
REGIONAL TARGETS
              a* Targets  .....  .  ............. '< '
      2. Regional PA/Si Targets ................ 12
      3. Regional Rl/FS Targets -  FY  1986 4 FY 1937 ...... ',3
      •i . Regional Remedial  Oesign  Targets ........... '• *
      5. Regional Remedial  Action  Targets ........... 14
      5. Regional Deletion  Targets .............. 15
      7. Enforcement - Regional  Targets  .  .......  .  .  .16
      8. Administrative Enforcement  Action  Target ....... 17
      9. Cost Recovery Action  Target  ............. 18
     10. Judicial Enforcement  Action  Target .......... 19
                                               i

-------
                                                 OSWER ft 9840.0
                                                         race
 !.  Removal Plan For-na*  ................. 20
 2.  Remedial Plan Fo^maT   ................ 3'
 3.  FIT Accomp i  i shmenr Scneduie  ............. 4-
 4.  Enforcement Plan Forma"1"  ............... A?
«il20END I X
 A. FY 1936 Enforcement Program  Pie"
 B. Remedial Site Activity  List  .  .

-------
                                                     OSWER ft 9840.0
          Tr.e purpose of t p.e Superfuno Comprehensive Accomp I i s^e .IT s
     P'an (SCA?) is to lay OUT, site-by-site, t ne enforcement, re-
     sponse, ana s.upporr activities each Region will underrate in
     FY 1996.  The overall program priorities, guidance end Regie?-.*'
     responsibilities are contained in the draft FY 1986 Opera'ing
     Sundance, which was sent to the Regional Administrators on
     December 18, 1984.  IT is crucial that the Regions read tne
     C : = ' -i ~ '. r. -^ i.. : c 2 ^. c e c 2 • e * c I i y 5 9 f c - e r - e p 2 r i n c their S C A P .  S r - -
     material, which last year appeared in The SCAF inST rue* i c~ ; , ; ;
     now in  the Operating Guidance.

          The SCAP will be used by the Assistant Administrate"
     for Solid Waste and Emergency Response  (AA-OSW-R) to identify
     Regional resource needs.  Allowances for FY 1986 removal,
     remedia1 , enforcement, laboratory, and community relations
     activities will oe i ssuec to the Regions Dases on tne SCA?.
     Technical  assistance, technology transfer, training, anc
     emergency preparedness will  continue to be directed from
     Headquarters.  Resources for these activities will  not be
     provided in Regional allowances.  Annual and quarterly
     targets for use in the.Admini strat or's Strategic Planning
     and Management  System (SPMS)  are also derived from the SCA°,
     thus permitting the Administrator to assess the progress
     cf each Region  in meeting Superfunc program.objectives.

          This year  The SCA? will  inciuGe outyear (FY 1987)
     projections for remedial  activities (Ri/FS, RD, and RA).
     This is important for identifying candidate sites for remedial
     action1  in the near-Term,  thus allowing.for measured consider-
     ation and discussion of tfve relative priorities of candidate
     sites prior to  tne f i. seal  year in which they are expected
     to start.  The  outyear projections will also include expected
     com? tetions,  T ni swill also help current and future planning
     While  it is essential  to devote sufficient *Jme a.nd a^*en-
     tion to the FY  1987 portion of the SCAP, obviously these
     projections will  change,  perhaps significantly, as we approac
     FY 1987.                       •


I I .   DESCRIPTION OF  THE PLAN
                     •
          The FY 1986 SCAP is a continuation of the FY 1985 Plan
     and contains remedial, enforcement, removal, laboratory and
     community relations components.  The SCAP is a summary of
     all  site-related activity planned for the upcoming fiscal
     year.   For removal activities, the annual plan sets forth
     targets for removals at National  Priority List (NPL) and

-------
                                                    OSVER * 9840.0


     "-"-"•". c ~ ? 5 . 2 ~ C s T ~ i 2 S : C 3 2 ~ T S 5- ~ • 5 * * i'J"C5 * ~ " - ~ 2 - -
     .t : C •' 2 2 ~ 5 : 3 . 9 -1 - 5 .  ^ 5 T 5 2 • 2 , 9 " " 3 r £ a •":£"*, 2 r- S C C P- *•• U ~ i t .
     r e • 3 ~ ' c- • s 2 ; ~ ' v i * ; e s are i 3 e .". * '; • • * 5 s "  ~~e p- i a n 3 y site
     na-ne, Sr2~e, activity tyse, exrec~ec s'art ca*e, ana- es*:T5*e:
     ess*, w', 11 a 22s'5"2T'on c* t^e '. ea c c-r ga .-! i r at'• on a°2/or
     ctr.er relevant 2a~a elements as shown in t r,e formats.  T r>e
     total  estimated costs in the SCAP will  be the basis for t re
     Regions quarterly allowance.


III.  DEVELOPMENT OF TH£ CQVPREHgNSIVE ACCOMPLISHMENTS PLAN

          Regions  should have a Site Management Plan (SMP) for
     each Superfund sitfe which is-on tne N~L, sro?osec r_- i*-
     clusion on the N P L, ' o r listed as a Oioxin Tier 1 or 2 site.
     The SMP provides estimated dates when site cleanup activities
     will  begin in current and future years.  Start dates will
     be  estimates  in out-years.  This framewor* will establish a
     better understanding between a Region and its States asout
     t.he schedule for planned activity at each NPL site in FY
     1936, FY 1987 and future years.  SMP milestones for tne
     current fiscal year are translated into tne more detaliec
     annual  SCAP.  Regions ar.e no* required to suomit SMPs to
     Headquarters, but the Regional Adminis*rator must certi*y
     that  SMPs have been developed in the Region and were used
     to  develop, both the FY 1986 and FY 1987 portions of the
   '  SCAP.  -During the annual Regional  evaluation, the HeaCquar-
     review team will  be looking at the process and results.
                                                          t
     The SCAP  identifies  candida*e  sites to  meet  Regional
S?MS targets,  and additional  si *e s  which may  also be  eligible
for.action during tne  fi'scai  year.   This will  ensure  that
the plan is  sufficiently  flexible to accommodate  a range  of
spending capabilities  in  the  fiscal  year.  The preliminary
FY 1986 plan  is r'eviewec  in Headquarters,  adjusted as neces-
sary to re*!-ect tne expected  fisca!  year budget,  anc  passec
bacK to the  Region.

     EachRegion will  suomit  two  copiesof the preliminary
FY 1986 SCAP  oy January 30, 1985  to Terry Ouverson (WH-5^3D;
who will then  distribute  them tp  the appropriate  Headquarters
offices for  review and comment.   After  a brief review period,
discussions  will be held  between  Headquarters and Regions,
during which the preliminary  FY 1986 plan will be tailored
to tit the fiscal year budget.  These discussions w.i II  end
February 28,  1985.  This  deadline  is necessary because the
SCAP information will  be  used as  input  to the FY  1986
Regional worKtoad»modeI s.  The  computations  for Regional
FTE allocation are due td'the Comptroller on March 1 ,. 1985.

     By-July 24,  1985, an adjusted  SCAP, shall be approve^
by the Regional Administator  and  submitted to the AA-OSwEI
Upon approval  of the AA-OSwER,  the  FY 1986 SCAP will  be

-------
                                                     OSWER # 9840.0
      ? ^
                      1966  5CA?  ano  me SCAP Review
          \a j u stments and amendments to the remedial component
     .of the. SCAP .are .d i scussed  more fully I n t he instructions
     for •''•he remedial component and closely follow the fY  1995
     procedures.   In general,  changes to the SCAP, which wculd
     alter tt>e e stab! 1 shed  5PMS targets or exceed ^ He Regional
     advir-s c* allowance, require «eadquart«-s approval.   Other
     cftaag-es refliiirs onl y —HOT i f i CST i on TO -Heac^uarTer s.
             ui ar1 y  sc"hedu1 «d  5 CAP -w-or-ksnops-, conference cai! s,
     or otner revie-* mechanisms are ordinarily t tve form for
     amending the SCAP.   However,  after written notification,
     the SCAP -may be amended,  at  any ti-nve.  The SCA? does no^
     •n-eed *o be amenoeo to  -nitiate remove!  activities.  However,
     •frve SCA9 snouid b«-. a mended  at tne end of -earn quarter to
     refi-ecf ail unanticipated ac*ivity.

          At the end of t-he se-cond ana third quarters o* FY  1986,
  -   a SCAP workshop .( Sim! l ar  to SCAP workshops and conference
     calls that wiii oe  held  during FY 1935). will  be conducted
     •between the Region and Headquarters.  The. purpose of r ne se
     reviews is to  assess pert ormence during the past quarter(s),
     and to revise  and  update  the succeed i ng q uarter ' s SCAP.
    .These reviews  will be conducTed via conference calls, work-
     •shop s , or other mechanisms.  During the fourth quarter  the
     frequency of commun i cat i on s will toe  increased to ensure
     that year t y TnrgeT'S  and  program priorities will be met.   A
     weThod" tor hand 1 i ng  fourth q.uarter obligations and the
     ^•squ i *"ea shifting  of  funds among regions to ensure proper
     fiscal management  will oe developed durl-ng ft 1985.

V.   R€*OV-AL/rEHf ORCEMENT
         Regional  removal targets ana a i 1 owances are  based  primar-
     ily on projected TY  1985 accompli shwent s and expenditures.
     Response Targets  have  >een esTabl i shed for tooth  NPL  and  non-
     MPL removal s, al tho-ugh It is recosniaed that the  latter  is
     largely ainant J c i pated  and carinoT be planned.  These  targets
     are based or\  historical  patterns and  o-n average  removal  costs
     The allowances  issued  for removal actions are  intended  to
     -fuTitJ all i-nc itJents,  and '-each Region snout d establish its
     own contingency reserve  fc^r unanticipated removals.
                                              i
         The SCAP  shows the number of projected starts and  com-
     pletions and  actual  starts and completions, for  NPL  sites
     and nw-NPL  incidents.  It also  lists actual ongoing removals

-------
                                                 SWER # 9840..0

 3.-
                                                ~  D S  P '• 2 ~ 1 6 0
                                                 w!  :  = "!o*
     anc *i .  stress acc
     ofeacnquarrsr.
                    -'S'e  s i ~5- spec i f ; c  reporting  a~  - ne  enc
     Enforcement targets for aoministrative orders are  based
on projected removal activity.  Both unilateral and consent
administrative orders for removal  response will be counted
towards the removal order target.   CERCLA §106 orders  for
access are to be reported but will  not count against the
removal' order targe*.  A continued  empnasis in FY  1986  will
be to take §106 (or RCRA §7003) judicial actions  for  selected
removal  situations  'see RemovaI/Enforcement Program) or for
col lection of penalties f o1" non-comp! iance with orders.
FY 1936 targets heve been set for  eacn of these two areas.
A new addition in  FY 1986 wi!!  focus on  RP searches completed
at all  non-NPL removal  sites.  Credit will be  given for
completed searches.  The Regional  targets appear  on page  16.

     In FY 1986, we will  initiate  cost  recovery negotiations
at all  completed removal  activities.  Targets  are  based on  pas
completions.  Cost  recovery referral targets for  FY  1936  are
set as a combined  target for removal and remedial  activities
Even so, each region win 2e de-signaled  sub-targets for rem
and remedial  based  on completions  anticipated.   If completio
do not occur as planned  in  one area or  the other,  substituti
may occur in order  to achieve the  combined target.  Regions
wi'.l  be required to develop a  strategy  for negotiations,
settlements or judicial actions  for all  completed  removal
and remedial  actions beginning in  FY 1986.   In addition to
negotiations for cost recovery at  removal actions, we  will
negotiate and give  credit for negotiations conducted  prior  to
the actua1 removal  action.  Regional targets apoear  en  page
                                                                  ' £
V 1 .  REMEDIAL/ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM

     A.   Preliminary Assessments  (PA) and  Site  Inspections (SI)

          The goal of the pre-remedia) site  evaluation  program is
     to complete PAs on all  sites  included  in  the  inventory as of
     January  1984 by the end of  FY  1986  and  all  Sis on  these sites
     by the end of FY 1987.  During  FY 1986, we  expect  the Regions
     to negotiate for States to  conduct  most,  if not al I ,  of the
     PAs using CERCLA cooperative  agreement  funds.   Nationally
     we expect FIT to perform  a-frproxi mate I y  50$  of  the  Sis that
     are done in FY  1986.  PA  and  SI  reporting* for  SPMS will
     be provided quarterly from  CERCLIS.  The  output from  CERCL
     on the first Friday following  the close of  the quarter wil
     be compared to the Regions' quarterly  targets  for  PAs and
     Sis.
                                                           t

-------
                                                 OSWER # 9840.0
          . ~ . Z . ,   i 3 r • .; 2 ,  Ma 5 5 . ,  97-.;  an; 3 •< 2 C " ' -J ' ~
 -A,  5;,  vig-agene-i r  A ss; sr.-jrce CM-.:,  5 i 73- ; -. spec* i en
 •j?  =''£•--•;  See  :efi-iitic-i3 on ;ace 44'.   T-.e Rec:3ns
 i":;ca~e  if  o re-NP L  act i /i 7 / »}'.,  DC i-jroe-: UTC er 3  Wu; ~ i -
 SiTe Cooperatvie  Agreemenr  (MSCA)  vehicle.   Tne Regions
 should  indicate  how many  PAs, Sis,  MAs, and SlFs will  be
 purchased  with the  funds.  How  many  are purchased  will
 not  necessarily  have  any  relationship  to SPMS targets,
 since  in many  statesmany PAs and  Sis  to be accompli shed i n
 FY  1986  were  already  purchased  in FY 1985.   Plus,  Regions
 may  negotiate  for more PAs  and  Sis than absolutely necessary
 in  craer to  insure that  sufficient  PA/SIs are received to
 meet Regions'  SPMS targets.  See  page 37 for an example OT
 how PA/SIs should  be  reported in the SCAP.

     In  developing planned  amounts for  PA,  Si, and MA activ-
 ities, the Regions  should use $1,700 per PA, $16,500 per SI,
 $150 per MA.   (See definitions  on  page  44.) If the Region
 Dei ieves these figures are  inadequate  and uses different
 standard multiples,  it should be noted  in the SCAP  submission
 We  have  not  provided  any  figures for SIF costs.  Therefore,
 the Regions must  indicate the value  used  to determine SIF
 budget for a  particular  state.

 B. Site Classification and  Responsible  Party Searches

     T .-j program objective  for  FY 1986  is to complete, during
 the course of the year, potential  responsible party  (?RP)
 searches and  site classification for all  sites currently on
 the promul gated NPL and for  all  sites  that  are on or will
 be formally proposed  for  inclusion  on  the NPL in FY  1966
 throug- the Federal Register publication.  In the FY 1986
 SCAP you will only be able  to count  RP  searches for  the NPL
 update.s proposed for  FY  ',986.  We  are  establishing a  separate
 target for RP  searches aT sites  where  a remova1  action  i s
 being considered.  As  in  FY  1985,  negotiations wit!  be  in-
 itiated for all enforcement-lead and Fund/Negotiated RI/FS
 and T ne i r • su-b sequent RD/RA.   Credit  will  be given for t ne se
 activities.  The targets  appear  on  page 16.

 C.   Remedial  Investigation/Feasibility Study (Rl/FS)

     The goal for each Region is to  develop a management
 strategy for ensuring that RI/FS work  at sites is completed
on schedule,  so the remedial  design/remedial  action  (RD/RA)
 phases can be started as  quickly as  possible.  This managemen
 scheme shalI  focus on qua! ity and  time! iness of activities,
as Rl/FS are pu shed t hrou{fh  the  reined ial,pipeline to compieti
Regions must expedite workplan development  and keep  both
 fund and enforcement-lead projects  on  schedule.

     The FY 1986 annual targets  for  Regional  Fund-lead RI/FS
 starts (broken down by Fund,  enforcement., and PRP-lead) are  s,

-------

        .  ^ Remeci-2;
        5  :  s~  srio* s  z
   ' ?-3- ,
                    r
jeered r Y  1936 ano  FY
                                                 OSWER # 9840.0
-r *•=•:' 2.  3':s''. -5 as se~ f ?.-•:•> o--,
~ e i . c ~ i v i - y ' i  st i s -3 r c v '• 3 e c  '."i A o : e n c
 -•?* ac~; / ; - i e s , i nc i jd;-"!c  st a r-- 5 T nr c
9i5 new  starts from t ne  SCf*.3, 2"" ?"o-
337 new  st a - 1 s based en  F e a s i a i i i t y
Stucy Comp let ions and  standard  timelines.   This list snouid oe
used as a guide to assist  you  in  developing your FY 1986 and
FY  1987 pians.

     An important dimension  of  the  RI/FS activity continues
to  be PRP assumption and preparation  of RI/FS.   The policies,^
procedures, and Regions' responsibilities  are fully explained
in  the March  20, 1984  RI/FS  Enforcement Guidance.  You should
refer to this document  during  your  FY 1986 cianni^g.  ~ n^-
national target for PRP RI/FS  is  50.   Tables on page 13 a~: '6
show regional targets,  as  well.   These numbers are for resource
dis+riDUtion  purposes  and  assume  that PRP  takeovers will  be
proportional  to the number of  RI/rS i n i t i at i on s.  Regions will
not be measured against these  targets. Regions are expected
*o  replace PR? takeovers with  new projects up *o the i'mi* of
the budget.   Approximately 20*  of the targeted  Enforcement
RI/FS may be  designated for  State Enforcement-lead sites.
Negotiation targets wil! be  based on  all  RI/FS  starts.

D.   Remedial  Design and Remedial  Action

     The first objective  is  to move all projects that are
through Record of Decision to  the design  phase.  The rY  1935
national target of 89  Fund-financed designs is shown by Region
on   page 14.   This i s a_ form i dabi e goa t .   Pipeline projects
must be closely tracke"d to ensure that FY  1986 commitments
are met.  Regional targets for FY 1987 design starts have not
been e-stabl ished.   In stead,  the eventual  targets will, oe based
on   Regional commitments made in the FY 1987 portion of Tne SCA

     The  second objective  is to move  every project where desig
is  comoieted  to construction as soon  as possible.  The regiona
targets for  56 Fund-financed remedial  actions are set forth on
page 14.  Additional reporting requirements are  set forth  in
the Discussion of the  Remedial  Program Plan beginning on page
3*.  As with  remedial  designs,  FY 1987 remedial action targets
will be based on the commitments  shown in  the FY 1987 portion
of   the SCAP.

     Negotiation targets  for RD/RA will  be set based'on RI/FS
completions.  Continued expansion of  the  use of adm i n i strat-i ve
order authorities is planned for  FY 1936.   Program objectives
are to  (a)  issue CERCLA 51*06 orders prior to undertaking RD/R.-
projects at approximately  5055  of  the  candidate  sifes; (b)  ag-
gressively  use RCRA 53013  orders  at Superfund  sites to  su|
remedial  investigation activity;  and   (c)  expand the prograt
i ssuing RCRA  §3008 orders  enforcing against parties who  fai^
or  inadequately respond to information request letters.

-------
                                                       OSWER #  9840.0

           •~~,~~  *~ '  5 ~ e - = ;  =•;  ::. * s T; - ~  a:->'-!- 3-- = -',=  ~ r - •? - 3 c a u n ~
      *3«3"-= ~ •*  ~2^5?ts  set  •-i  - ~: 3 2-e».   R-35! c^ 5 are -s^ues'ej
      tc p-rCjecT r''  ' *-2? CERCLA  §'J5  administrative  orse's ~or RD/Rn
      o a s a c on  ;• r o _ 5 c ~ -2 o R 1 / ? S c 5 m o ' e r i 2 n s .  See  D 2 2 -2 '• ~ .

      E.   Judicial  Enforcement  Actions  for  Private  Response

           One  program  objective  for  FY  1936 is  to  initiate-new
      CERCLA §106  (or RCRA  57003) judicial actions  at  enforcement-
      lead sites wnere  a  feasibility  study has  been  completed to
      compel  PRPs  to undertake RD/RA.   Amendment  of  already  referred
  	_R_C_R_A__$_7_003 .cases  will  not  be counted against  the target.  Amend-
      ments of  §107  actions to  include  §106  actions will oe  counted
      in meeting the target,,  Regions are  requested  to project F Y
      1987 CERCLA  §106  actions  for RD/RA  cased  on  projected  RI/FS
      completions. See  page  19.

      F.   Cost Recovery Actions

           An additional target  has  been  added  for  submission of cost
      documentation checklists which  snould  generally  be planned for
      one quarter  prior  to  initiating negotiations.   Regions will be
      required to  develop  strategy for  negotiations, settlements or
      judicial  actions  for  a I I   sites  where cost  recovery actions have
      matured, beginning  in  FY"l986.  Referrals  for  joint  §106/107
      claims or referrals  which are  simply adding  claims for adminis-
      trative COSTS to  existing  §1C6  claims  will  not count again st t r
      target.  Joint claims sh'ould be counted as Judicial  Enforcemen'
      Actions for  Private Response (§106  "eferrals).  Regions are
      requested to project  FY  1987 CERCLA  §107  remedial  cost recover^
      referral s based on projected completions  of  remed:2i projects.
      See page  18.

      G .   D-e ! e t i o n

           As t ne  program enters  FY  '986,  the de'.etion of  sites
      from the NP'_ is an  important priority. Pursuant to  the
      March 27,  1964, interim deletion  procedures,  tne Regions
      should  work  closely with Headquarters  to  submit  complete
      deletion packages.  Regions will  establish targets based
      on a careful  assessment of  the  technical  information required
      to justify a deletion  request.  These  candidates for deletion
      will  be included  in the FY  1986 SCAP submission.


VII.  PROGRAM SUPPORT DIRECTIVES

      A.   Laboratory Analysis Program  Support
                               --•*•
                                               t
           Guidance concerning revised  estimation  techniques for
      projecting FY  1965 analytic  support  service  requirements
      has been developed. This  is being  furnished  separately and
      is now, or will shortly be  in  the  hands of  the ESD Director.
      That guidance contains instructions  and worksheets for doc-

-------
                                                OSWER # 9840.0
 he -ie« ~ec 11 : •: us  ^s nseoe^ ~o -s^sjre  -*va-  samp •. e  ana^/ses
are proper:/ scnec-j;ec anc * r.at  su^il;'-en-  '•2DO!-atory  capac'"/
     1 a ! n
     Pages 53-54 contain charts  for  reporring  summary  FY
1986 analytic services data.  Summary  information  is needed
now for long range planning.  In completing  these  charts,
Regions should folio* the  revised  FY 1985  approach mentioned
a bove .

     Based on the final negotiated targets in  the  SCAP,
annual  Regional  allocations of projected CLP capacity  will
be provided by mid-August.  Monthly  allocations for the
first quarter wil! be provided in  September.  Thereafter,
monthly allocations will be provided at  the  end of each
month for the subsequent tnree months (adjusted as needed
based on actual  avai'aole  capacity).  For  example, at  t ne
end of October, initial January  allocations  will  be provided
and, if needed, previous November  ano  December allocations
will be revised.  T;iis will provide  an updated three-month
projection on an ongoing monthly basis.

     Regarding the BSD laboratory  sample load, you should
continue to consider 'that  special  actions, priorities,
samples needing immediate  turn-around  a n.d  some of  the
enforcement samples will oe processed  internally.   We  are
working with the Office of Regional  Operations regarding
ESO roles and will provide more  specific guidance  prior
to development of the  final SCAP.  At  present, your esti-
mates should -take into account that  there  may  be increases
for staffing and equipment upgrades  at the ESO laboratories.
You should specifically relate ESO laboratory  sample load
to your resource estimates.

3 .   Ca se Suoget s

     Extramural support of ongoing enforcement activities •* : '. !
be coordinated through the case  budgeting  process.  OWPE has
various contract  resources available,  including Technical
Enforcement Support  (TES)  I,  TES M  and  .the  Interagency
Agreements with the U.S. Geological  Survey and the Army  Corps
of Eng i neer s.

     Each Region will  be given a I i
-------
                                                        OSWER # 9840.0

                       * '  •  2 : SC ;•? a ' '. ; C 3 ~ •? ;  ~ j 50?pCf~_Ris::O--J.
        ' •? * ;  c - * o.- ~ .= "i e i ~  2 : * : 3 •! s « ~ : c ~  ~ 2 •-• r ; => •= n ;• 5 r e r - e - - o 3 3 - :> ~
        2 --5  sc •ad u . ec  - c~  - eg D~ ; 2r i or, ,  ; i ~ I 3- '• 3n ,  3C "n i n ' s~ "s ~ '• ••'2
        acr'ons  or  where  c v 9 - 5 i i n*  OT ;-i/are-oai"Ty response is
        necessary.  Eacn  ^eg^on  s^ou'C  prov'ae an  estimate or ex~ra-
        •nura^ resources necessary to  Sucpcrr - -,e se activities 3a sec
        on  inoividua!  sife  characteristics.  All  nenbers of the
        negotiation/litigation  team,  including DOj where applicable,
       .must  be  involved  in  * hese  initial  estimates.  Some extramural
        dollars  will be available  in  FY 1986 for a pilot program of
        funding  states  tor  oversight  of private-party response at
        State-enforcement  lead  sites.  Estimates should be made  basea
        on the guidance that  was issued for the FY 1985 SCAP.

             Oncei Headquarters  receives the Regional  proposal s,  a
        Regional Budget Target  will  be  developed based on the Regions
        projected  support  needs  compared to the overall extramural
        budget.  The Region's are then  free to distribute these
        resources among active Regional  lead cases.  Headquarters
        will  continue to  process the  necessary paperwork to inititate
        the contract process.

        C .    FIT Tracki ng

             The Field  Investigation  Teams are an  important resource
        in t he accomplishment of remedial/enforcement targets and
        goa:s.   As delineated intheFlT AccompiishmentsSchedul. e,
        numerous activities  are  pe'rformed by FIT.   The Regions
        should be planning  the use  of this resource and tracking
        resource utilization.  Regions  must submit FIT estimates in
        advance.  Regions  should keep an accounting of FIT usage.


VIM.   DIOXIN ACTIVITIES
             ^
             By the end of  FY  'i985, Regions should have completed
        preliminary invesTigationsat ail  identified Tier  la ano
        I la d i ox i n  sites  and  should  have completed all workpians
        for response actions  at  Tier  I  and I I  sites and initiatec
        response actions  at  Tier  la and Ma sites.  Targets have
        been  set for the  following  program goals in FY 1985: (a)
        completion of all workpians for response' actions at alt
        Tier  la  I and  Ma  sites, and  {b) i n i t i at i on of response
        actions at any Tier  IM-VM  sites referred to OSWER by the
        Office of Water Regulations and Standards.

             Response actions include the development and execution
        of work plans for the elimination of hazards associated  with
       the site, whether the response  will  be fund-financed, enforce-
       ment/PRP lead or  state-lead.  Tier I,  la,'II and Ma sites
       which have been screened and  found not to  be contaminated
       with  TCDO may count  as response actions completed, as no fur-
       ther  response action will be  taken except  possibly to address
       problems associated  with other  hazardous substances.

-------
OSWER # 9840.0

-------
                              OSWER # 9840.0
FY 1986 SCAR  TARGETS

-------
                                                    OSNER * 9840.0
REGION-
*!•''•
-3m 195
NPL
2
4
c
^
5
4
3
2
3
3
2
4 Ac com: • ' = nmsnr 3)
START
NON-NPL
8
13
• 7 "5
21
32
12
13
6
12
8

COMPLET

IONS
NPL NON-NPL
4
4
Z.
4
7
3
2
3
3
1
8
13
27
21
35
12
15
6
"'2.
7
   I V




   V




   V 1




 V I I




 VIII




   IX




   X







TOTAL                    33       157        '    36        156

-------
                                                 OSWER # 9840.0
= - r • : v ' ••) - - •' j s z T T ; v r \, -
s D .~( : r .*» — i ->. : 3 v c T j
REGION FY !»c
EA-
1 240
1 1 900
1 1 1 430
IV 1,135
V 1,295
VI 100
V 1 1 255
VIII 220
•IX 330
X 	 3 1 0
JNC S 1TE
•.SGE'S 3V f
5
11
55 .
200
100
280
325
120
90
60
80
70
i M c c ; ."• •*• : ~ . \ £
. 'N w - • w . » •—
REGION
FY 1
£1
253
949
453
1 ,198
1 ,366
105
269
232
343
327


986
11
59
216
108
302
351
129
97
65
36
75
                   5215    -.380          5,500     >-
TOTAL              5./I3

-------
                            R!/-5  CAND1DATES
                                     OSWER # 9840.0
^ E 3 i w .
;
i 1
1 1 1
! V
V
V 1
VII
VIM
! X
X
	 - - 	
^
TOTAu NATIONAL
TARGET

REGION
t -
1
1 1
1 1 1
IV
V
V 1
V 1 1
VIM
IX
X
__ 	 	 	
=9CGRAM
z
14
8.
10
20
1
4
3
' i
4
^ ^^"
78'


PROGRAM

3
14
3
10
20
1
4
4
1 1
4
-
= - • ? 3 5
?NFG?.C£M£>T
^
13
6
6
14
3
1
1
3
1
	 -^— — ^•••^
„ . ^ _— ^ ^— • — -
52

FY 1987
ENFORCEMENT

4
13
6
6 ;
1 4
3
1
.-r 1
3
1
	
?RP
•3
12
5
6
14
2
2
1
2
3
	 _^-^_ ^^^^•^•^
^^^^^^•^^^^^^^^^^
50


PRP

3
12
5
6
14
2
2
, 1
2
3
„.
-37AJ.
* ^i
39
19
22
43
6
7
5
1 6
3
	 •-^^^•^^^^^^••^^^^
l^^BIW"^^"^^^^^^^^^
180 '


TOTAL

13
39
19 •
22
48
6
7
5
16
8
.
TOTAL NATIONAL
78
52
180

-------
                                      OSWER # 9840.0
    REGION              TARGET
      I  I                  15




      III                 12




      IV                  11.




      V                    22




      VI                  10




      VII                  1.




      V  I I I                  2




      IX           .        6




      X                     3






    TOTAL        '     .89






1986 REMEDIAL ACTION  REGIONAL TARGE'S




          FUND-FINANCED




    REGION             TARGET




      I                     6




      II                  11




      -IL.I                 11




      IV             ;      6   '




      V     .              .10




      V  I                   6




      VII                  0




      VIII**"            2  ,




      IX                   2




      X                     2






    TOTAL                 56

-------
                                                OSHER # 9840.0
5<    3QgL.M-NASY  = c^NAL CELSTlDN TAR^FTS  -  ?" 1986






Regions                    Number^oLlIliJ*



  I




  I I
  ! V




  V




  V I




  V 1 I




  V I I




  IX




  X
 ^Targets to  be  provided by Regions.

-------
                                                                                                      OSNER *  9840.0
                                                        -l?ss s'i?  T^SrETS

:.«si?.  t ?..?. SEA?.:H£S: R«V>-. :F.:E-£
                                                         :o
       u*i-<» • V • • ••* *<• * •••  *j** * • •»•
       Sta! fitri jBwisK-ta! fir;. s;;ts
                                                             6   .    a   I
      s ?u:.  fSiVS't ?ARTY R£a?w!«s£:MV:HL.  .   ie
                                                                 36
                                                                          e   :   14
                                                                                           .
                                                                                                   i  ;     3
                                                                                            2   !    11    2
             ?:?. ?«iv6Ts  fns- «s?-:!iss:?,:/?s  .so
        14   :   3i  :   29  i    10   :  .10:    5


            •       .       I        I

!4  !    22   i   4S  :    si     7   .    5   '.   14


    t        i        ;       «        •        '

11  :   .12   .   26   i   ;*  '     4   :    u   :    7
:ASK!HiST8ATiVE £N?uR:£R£KT  ACTlOSr-ns
                                                   e   .
                                                          ;<   ;   2s  i    ia  •    'io
                                                    ii  -    13  :     ?  :  .  is   i.  '.«• :    !  s    .3  :
.iD»:KIsTfiHTiV£
           IVE ENruRCENENT ACTI^S-^Ol* ORDERS'.
                                                                     3  :     4  ;    2   ,    2  :
  OSIKSsTMT-VE ENFGSCsNE*: «T!3Ns-s:WS a
                                                                          3   ;    s
:;iii::>L EM?uRC£KENT ftLT!DS5:T?>0.?I.PENALTIES   I    1  ;     1  :   ' 1   :     l-l  1    I  i    1


                                               i       .        i        i        i        i

-ar 5ECWCTV  CKCKUSTS:liaBVAL               1    5  :    10  :    25   !    15   1   10   :    3
 C35? REuJVESY Q£CKi.:STS:RBKBIAL
                                                                             0  i
                                                              .-•**
 .:2sT SERVER1!  ACT13HS RErEn-ES TS sS-«tHCVft5.   !    •   ;    2  :     si     *   •    9   '.    2
 .:D5T REMVEfiY ACTIONS  RErESRE!- Tu Ht-nEREulAL  !     1   :    «  '-     i  i     1   '.    0   ',    1
 II-ICJIK RE5?ONSE ACTIONS.TIERS  i.ifc.-l.IIA
                                                      i  ;    10  :     0'  i    o  :    o
                                                                                                    1  i    1
                                                                                                    5  :   to

-------
                                                    QSNER # 984°-
                        REGION

                       ANNUAL TARGET:
Administrative Enforcement Action  -  Remedial
SITE/STATE
TYPE
FY 87 Quarter
  2        3

-------
                                                     OSWER * 9840.0
                        REGION




                       ANNUAL TARGET:
Cost Recovery Actions Referred  to  Hdqt - Remedial




                                      FY a" Quarter
SITE/STATE
TYPE

-------
                                                     OSWER # 9840.0




                         REGION!         	




                        ANNUAL TARGET:  	






Administrative Enforcement  Actions to  Hdqt (106/7003)






SITE/STATE     TYPE           	FY 87 Quarter	

-------
                               OSWER # 9840.0
      FY  1986  SCAP




REPORTS  AND  INSTRUCTIONS

-------
                                                 OSWER % 9840.0
      T-e rs-ncva1  componen- si * -e SCAP cors: st s c: *nree
 sections:   t ie Amuai  Re-nova! Plans and Accomp i i shrr.enr s Sum-
 mary,  the  Quarter!y Removal  Plans a no Accomplishments  Summa r/
 and  the Additional  Quarterly Remova!program Accomplishments
 (SPMS).  Detailed instructions and definitions are provided
 below  for  each.

 Annual  Removal  Plans anq Accomplishments Summary

      This  section will  be prepared -by the Regions and  HQ and
 submitted  to OERR as par- of the overall annual  SCAP.  Only
 the  number of projected starts and completions are requireo;
 identification of sites by name wiM  be provided on trie
 Quarterly  Summary.   Financial obligations are at so recorded.
 The  Annual  Summary  wi I I report bo*h plans and accomoi i shments
 and  will  be updated quarterly.

 I.    Removal  Response Summary

      Annual  targets for. starts and completions of NPl  and
 Non-NPL removaI  sites will be negotiated with the Regions
 and  finaii-zed by Headquarters (Sefer to page 11 for propos
 Regional  targets.)  Regions will  then provide projecti-ons
'for  how many removals will be started and comp-leted during
 ea'ch quarter over the course of the fiscal   year.  Accomp! isn
 ments and  ongoing actions will be reported  at each quarter's
 end .

      To modify annual  projections, Regions  should add  actual
 accompj i shments from previous quarters to revi sed projections
 for  future quarters.  Revised annual  projections appear  in  the
 far  right  column of the Annual Summary.

      Oe f i n i t i on s:

        8  Start s -  number of removal  s where on-site wor*  has
           commenced and the  six month limit has begun.

        •  Comp1et i on s - number of removal s  where the  OSC
           completes on-site action and demobilizes.

        •  Ongoi ng - number of removal s  started in any  prior
           quarter,  and currently ongoing.   (To be reported  as
           accomplishments only; projections are not necessary
                                        t
II.  Removal Financial Summary

     Headquarters will issue Regional  financial
all removal activities during FY  1986.   Regions
                                                  allowance
                                                  should  use

-------
                             .- -  ,„               CSWER # 9840.0

""•=:•? ~^~r  S "C ; •" 3 I e C ~  ~~5  ! 9 v S •  of  T -j 1 jj ; n •;  r9G'Jr'"30 f S r
•i = -_ -2T10V5  s 3 rv;  r 3-i - >4 P L. • e Ti o •> 2 : s  in  aacn  ;u5r~9<".   Re3! or. 3
3 -i s -J • : 2 • so e 5T 2:;' i = n a  con r'ngency  reserve  far jnanricipa^ec
r 9 nova; s.  3-o j ec * > or s  shou'o be maae for  3!'  categories,
r 3r eac 'n  quar-er .

     Actual obligations  (i.e., Del i very  Ord er s, not Procure-
ment Requests) should be reported  for NPL  and  non-NPL removal s
only; ac*ual contingency obligations  need  not  oe reported
separately because  those funds will  be  represented  as either
NPL or non-NPL expenditures.
         Ke 3? OR Sc S

         Responses are those  removal-type  actions undertaken
by potentially  responsible  parties as a  result of EPA efforts.
AM incidents where PRPs  undertake.a  removal  action for which
the approval processing had begun  should  be  reported here.
Tnis includes PRP cleanup undertaken  in  response to unilateral
AOs, negotiated consent AOs,  or  consent  decrees.  Voluntary
PRP cleanup  should not be included.

     De f i n i t i on s:

       0  PRP Starts  - number  of  incidents where PRP nas
          mobilized cleanup contractors  on-site to conduct
          removal tynp-e- act i on s in  response to unilateral  AOs,
          negotiating consent'AOs  or  consent decrees.

       o  PRP CompIet i on s - number of incidents wnere PRP has
          completed removal type work and  demobilized.

      ^
IV.  Removal Enforcement  Summary

     Targets for  Administrative  Orders for Removals, and
Cost Recovery Referral s for Removal actions will  be negotiated
wirh the Regions  and  finalized by  Headquarters (See page 16
for proposed targets).  Regions  will  provide projections
for the number  to be  completed in  each quarter.  While names
of sites will not be  required  in the  annual  plan for admin-
istrative orders, the names of sites  to  be referred for cost
recovery actions  should be  listed. This will  enable Head-
quarters to assure that the appropriate  cost documentation
is available prior to referral.  No targets are provided for
removal  negotiations, as  such, but targets are provided for
all categories  of negotiations.  The  number  of removal
negotiations initiated should  be reported  at the end of each
quarter.

-------
                                               OSWER # 9840.0

                          Plans gr.c -.CCSTIP -. • snmen- 5 Rec or
        •/ .  5 and PRP C1 eanup s

    ~nis  seer ion consists Di 3  sec* i'sr 3': Ongoing Removals,
Planned Starrs  (-which  inc'udesCompietionsand Obligations),
and PRP Cleanups.  This will identify  planned actions and
actual  accomplishments in a  site  specific format.   In
addition, ongoing actions started  in a previous quarter
are listed.  This should represent all removal activity
taking place in the quarter.  The  number of  sites  listed  in
each category should be the  same  number entered in  the  "P"
and "A" columns for that quarter  in the Annual Removal  Plans*
and'AccompI i shments Summary.  Regions  need not submit firs*
quarter reports as part of the  preliminary SCAP.   T r.« se
reports should be submitted  on  August  21, 1985.

     Def i n i t i on s:

       0  Start s - number of removal s  where  on-site work
           has commenced and  the  six month I imit  has begun.

       o  CompIet i on s  - number  of  removal s which the OSC
          completes and demobilizes.

       •  Ongoi ng - number of removal s started in  a previo
          quarter,  currently ongoing.  (To be reported as
          compl i shed start and  projected and accompl i shed
          como I et i on s) .

       °  Co st - planned or  actual  obligations for each
          removal during the quarter of  submission. (Obliga-
          tions = Delivery Order,  Executed  IAG, Letter  Contra
          Notice to Proceed, or  Order  for Services).

       •  Comment s - should  indicate any reasons  for delay O"
          discrepancies between  projections  and actual
          accompl i s hment s.

     Unanticipated removals  will  not  ae  shown in  the "PLND
Start" column, but should be reported  at the end  of a  quarter
as actual  starts, with the designation N/A entered into the
"PLND START" columns when you report  your quarterly accomp-
I i s hment s.

     Planned and actual obligations are also reported  on  the
quarterly reports.  These planned  and  actual  obligations mus
correspond  with the quarterly figures  shown  on the Financial
Summary portion of the ATinual Summary  Cjhart.

     Regional Removal  Program personnel must coordinate
Enforcement Program personnel to complete this report.
"PLND" data is required.  Ongoing and  new PRP response
actions will be reported as  accomplishments, at  the end o

-------
                                                  OSWER ft 9840.0
                        .-a
io- •«-:;:'-,  T ^s  5?3-ova;  processing  ^ad  begun  snoot -3 oe re?pf*e-.
^.e'a.  ?5.? c '• ear. up s «iii  c» : ; 57 9 a  i •->  This  section ^rom
^ja-~er T.- Qu3~~3r  -j~ *!"  a comp.e'ion  !s  re?or*ec.

      'nformaTion  submitted by Regions  in  7. he i r Quarterly
Reports will be  verified  and compiled  by  ERD  for  presentation
to the Assistant  Administrator,  ERD will return  to the
Regions a  copy of the final  quarterly  report  subsequent to
t he AA ' s br i ef i ng .

-------
                                                     OSWER # 9840.0

       ^3w i ~.~N^_  ;:J.-"E^_'  ^£<«'Cv-,v.  = -.03?.-Yi  -.CwC'M°_  3HMEN75


Additional 0 u a •" ~ g r i v Removal  " •* :> c. r g m A c ; o m g i ' s r.m e n •*•

     Tnis  summary  «as  developed as a joint  effort  oy  Headquarters
and the Regional Removal  orancn Cniefs, ana  represents a  consensus
of important removal accompl i shments not reflected el sew tie re  in
the SCAP 0  It also  delineates accompl i shment s made  in  t he Oil
Program,,  These accomplishments will be used  for  workload modeling
and program  evaluation, and  have been developed in conformance
with SPMS reporting  requirements.  No projections are  required
for these activities.

I.  CERCLA PROGRAM

    # of Designated  Hazardous Substance Notifications
    # of Other Notifications (non-CWA)
    # of PRP, State, or Local Cleanups where  EPA
       Provided On-Scene  Oversight
    # of On-site Removal  Investigations
    # of Action Memos  Prepared
    # of Cost Recovery Packages Prepared  by  Removal
       •Program Staff
    # of PRP Response  Plans  Prepared by Removal Program
       Staff for CERCLA 106  Orders
    # of Spill Violations Referral.s  Prepared
    # of Non-notification Referral s  Prepared
    # of Community  Relations Profiles Preparec
    # of Community  Relations Plans Prepared
I  I . 01L PROGRAM

    # of Or'l Spill  Notifications
    # of CWA-funded  Oil  SpiI I s Cieaned  Uo by EPA
    # of PRP,  State,  or  Local  Cleanups  Where EPA
       Provided On-Scene Oversight
    # of Cost  Recovery Packages Prepared
    # of Non-notification Referral s Prepared
    #  of Sp iI I V i olati on Referral s to  USCG
    # of SPCC  Inspections/Reviews
    # of SPCC  Facilities In/Out of  Compliance at
       Time  of  Inspection                               (IN)
                                                        (OUT)'
                                              (NOT REGULATED)'
    # of  SPCC  Violation  Warning.Betters Issues
    # of  SPCC  NOVs Issued  or  Referral  Packages'Prepared
    # of  SPCC  Facilities Brought  into Compliance
    # of  FEMA  Damage Survey Reports
    # of  FEMA  Disaster-Related Inspections

-------
;-: ^3:                                    OSWER ft 9840.0

NC~:fICST!ons - Number of HOTi *icat 1 ons  raceivec,  pro-

cassea,. -ana : oggec by EPA.  Count  should NOT  -nci-i
s~2*3-"JSCG not '<• f : cat : o^ s f3--wafcsed ex po st  - a c T c  *
mcntni/ summaries unless foil owed  up oy E?A.  Coun
should include potential releases, notifications  no
recognized by CERCLA (e.g., harmless substances,  sp i i i s
below RQ) , and spills at waste  sites if reported  to
EPA.  Reports o-f releases  involving chemical s not
designated under CERCLA should  be  counted as  "OTHER".
Dupl i cate reports on the same incident  should not be
EPA On-Scene Oversight at Non-Federa 1 I y-F undsd  Removals -
Number of incidents cleaned up by the responsible  party
(RP), State, local authorities, or other party  where  tie
3iUk) or CERCLA  funds are not invoked, but  where  EPA
(or TAT) provides on- scene oversight  and technical
assistance to ensure  that adequate cleanup takes place.
EPA funded removals should NOT be counted  in  this
category.  Inciaents  where the State  conducts a removal
through. a cooperative agreement or contract  should  not
be counted in this category.  A single  incident should
be counted ONLY ONCE  no matter how many t i me s a n EPA
OSC (or TAT) goes back on-scene or how  many  phases the
response entai Is.

Qn-Site Removal  Investigations - A removal  investigation
may be conducted  by EPA ana/or TAT,  and must  include
an on-site component, such as a walk  around  survey  or
samp I ing, to be counted as an output  for thi s category.
Investigations conducted entirely by  the State  should
not be counted in this category.

Action Memos Prepared - Number  of  action  memos prepared,
Count should include all memos  prepared  even  if the
removal  action is not approved  or  a  Non-Federal  party
assumes responsibility  for the  cleanup.

PRP Response Plans - Number, of  re sp.on se  plans removal
staff prepared to detail what cleanup  measures the
potentially responsible party should  be  required to
take under a CERCLA 106 administrative order.

Spill Violation Referrals - Number of  referrals to EPA
or the Coast Guard for  violation  of  CWA  Section 311(b)(3
for the discharge of oil or CWA hazardous substances
into navigable water»«.

Non-notification Referral s - Number  of referrals for

-------
                    - 26 "-""

                                          OSWER # 9840.0

non-no~ '• r 1 ca~ i on c i =T o!i ;i-  hasaraccs  suostance
-a'.aase 23 -so-'-3-: :•/ Sec*'en  ";D2(2: c* CE-.-LA cr
Section 3 1  • ( b ) \ 5 ) of t .ne C'ean  Water ACT.
Community Re'. 3* ions 3rp* j i e - A  5 ho-*
relations plan wnicn  is  a brief  analysis of tne nature
of citizen concerns, the  key site issues, and program
objectives that must be  prepared for removal actions
lasting longer than five  days, but less than 45 days.

Community Relations Plan  (CRP) - The planning, manage-
ment, and budget document that guides a community
relations program at Superfund sites.  ACRP is prepared
for all removals lasting  longer  than 45 days.  The
basic components of the  plan are an assessment of
citizen concerns and a description of twoway communi=>
cation activities, based  on on-site discussions, conducts
at the site.

CWA-funded Oil Spills Cleaned Up by EPA - Number of
spills cleaned up by EPA  using CWA 311(k) funds.   A
single incident should be counted ONLY ONCE regardless
of how many  times an EPA  OSC (or TAT) goes  back on  scene,
or how many  phases the response  entai I s.

SPCC  Inspections/Reviews - Number of  spill  prevention
compl iance. reviews performed by  EPA and/or  TAT.  Counf|
should include both on-site  inspections and detailed
plan  reviews.  Follow up  inspections  at a  single  fac
may be counted separately.

Facilities  In, Out of, "Brought  Into Compliance  -  For
the purposes of data  collection, facilities should  be
considered in compliance if the  operator  presents  to
t'PA or its representative a certified,  implemented  plan
which  has been -eviewed  and  amended as  required  by 40
CFR  112.  Facilities  inspected which  turn  out  not  to
be regulated under 40 CFR 112  (e.g.,  those  that  have
too  little  storage capacity to  qualify  or  are  transpor-
tation-related) should be counted as  "Not  Regulated."

Warning Letters Issued - Any written  communication
(with the exception of an NOV) which  notifies  a  facility
of non-compliance with 40 CFR  112.

NOVs  Issued  or SPCC Referral Packages Prepared  -  If  NOV s
are  issued directly by removal  personnel,  the  region
should count the number  of NOVs issued  as.the  output
for  this category.  -«i f removal  personnel  document  and
package all  the evidence necessary  to issue the  NOV,
but  legal counsel or  enforcement personnel  actually
issues the  legal document, then  the Region  should  coi

-------
                                          OSNER # 9840.0

*-9 Tumoer of -5i^T2, packages  praoareo  as T -->e. ou *? u~
;cr T,; s •ca-ego-y.   3o-:i  OO-PJTS are  consiaerso sq-j'-
va',.ent for data coi -action  pu'~?cses.   Regions shou'. d
cocinr EITHER NOVs  or  raferra!  packages';- aocunen^ packages
anc referra'. s snou: i  not  33  soup:.e  counrea.

Damage Survey Reports - Number of  damage  survey reports
written or coordinated by removal  personnel pursuant
to Section 302 of  the Disaster Relief Act to assess
damage to water supply, storm  drainage, and wastewater
treatment facilities after  a Federally declared disaster.

PEMA In spect i on -  Number  of  interim or final  inspections
conducted, oocumented, or coorai.nated by  removal  person-?
to appraise  restoration efforts  at  water  supply, storm
arainage, or waste water  treatment  facilities as part
of EPA's assistance  to FEMA  under  the Disaster Relief
Act.

-------
                                                    REC1ON 0«)
o
 •
o
*v
00
ANNUAL 9
TARGET 0 J'LNO  ACTL
PLND  ACIL
                        IVEAR-TO-OATEI
   (fflVW 3       OTR  4    JOCT.  1.  19841 REVISED
PLND  ACTL  PLND  fcCTL C  PLND  ACTL I PROJECTIONS
RF.MOVAL SUHHARV
STARTS
NPL
NON-NPL
rtlMPLFTUINS
nri.

1 N4GII INC
.
IIPL
tlf IN NPL
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
( «OOOB >
nmnr.NT YEAR FUNDS
nri SUES
m IH NPL INCIDENTS
CUMl INOENCY
cAnnvnvFR FUNDS
NPI. SITES
NUN-NPl. INCIDENTS
TOTAL FUNDS
PRP RFflPONSF.?}
nTART*)
NI'L
N11N NPL
CHI1PLETIONS
WM.
HI IN NPL


O
O

o
o

N/A
N/A

O
O
O
N/A
N/A
0

w/t
N>
&


o o o o
o o o o

o o o o
o o o o

N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A
'

O O O O
o o o ••" *o
O N/A O N/A O N/A O N/A
.«
N/A O N/A O N/A O N/A O
N/A O N/A O N/A O N/A O
O O 0 O

. ..A Kl^V »/A
N/k N/W . ' T '
H> l^/» |J/A W/A
M/A M/\ |yjA W/A
M> M/A »JA ilM
9
1

0
o

o
o

N/A
N/A
-~ — 7— —

,'-
1 N/A
N/A O
N/A 0


"A
fft


o
0

o
0

N/A
N/A

O
O
O
1

O

*>
•f*
f/A

-------
                                                                               OSWER # 9840.0

                        3UAOTSSLY REMOVAL PLANS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS SUMMARY
                                  ONGOING REMOVALS FOR REGION 00
                                           AS OF 10/1/84
                              NPL  PLNO    ACTUAL   PLWO    ACTUAL    PLANNED     ACTUAL
SITE NAME                 ST  FLO  START    START   COMPL  COMPLETE  08LICATN    OBLICATN  COMMENTS
                         OUARTERLY REMOVAL PLANS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS SUMMARY
                                          PRP  REMOVALS FOR QUARTER 1
                                           FOR  RCOION 10
                                  NPL  ACTU PLAN   OOLLAB
   BITE NAME                 9T  FUO  STAR COMP    VALUE    COMMENTS

-------
                                                                               QSNER f 9840.0

                        QUARTERLY REMOVAL PLANS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS SUMMARY

                                   PUANN£O~9TAR*S-PflR QUARTER i

                                           FOR REGION 00

                              WPL  PLND    ACTUAL   PLNO     ACTUAL    PLANNED     ACTUAL
SITE NAME                 ST  FUO  START     START   CO"PL  COMPLETE  OBLICATN    OBLICATN

-------
                                                OSWEP # 9840.0
                                    SE^I?; A_  =L.ANS
DISCUSS! ON 0? REMEDiAL  PROGRAM  PLAN

     T'ie p o.-p o se of t !-,e  r erne 3 i a I .  p rocram  plan  is TO  iay  OUT
t ne acrivities and  schedule for remedial  projects in  FY  1986.
Appendix B i s a list  of  remedial  actions  That  should  be  tne
Starting point for  your  planning.  The  following instructions
are to be used fully  in  filling out  the  forms  on pages 44
and 45.

Descriptors  on the  Format

     Many possible  project descriptors  are  provided  to clearly
identify the lead or  project  type, contractor  undertaking  The
project and  support functions.  The  main  objective of the
remedial format is  to capture a 11  possible  project costs,  in-
cluding community relations,  enforcement  support, COE tecn-
nical  assistance and  any other  identifiable pro ject- spec i f i c
costs.  As the remedial  format  is-completed,  utilize  any
additional  expenditure categories needed  tc ful ly capture
project costs.  Define any additional descriptors you may
create so they are-  fully understood.

A I I owance s

     The FY  1986 SCAP is the  final approved plan. for  FY  1986.
Allowances will  be  granted during the fisca1  year based  on
the FY 1986  S'CAP and  monies in  the allowance  are reserved  for
those sites  on the  SCAP.  Obi igations may not  be made for
sites or activities which do  not  appear  on  the SCAP.   Thus,
the plan must be amenaed or adjusted  if  obi igations are  re-
quired for sites or activities, including monies to supple-
ment ongoing projects, which  do not  appear  on  the plan;
Procedures for adjusting or amending the  plan  appear  below.
The final  FY 1986 SCAP  is used  to construct the  first
two quarters' advice  of  allowance.   The  amendea  FY 1986  SCAP,
which will  be prepared after  the  semi-annual  review,  will  be
used to issue the third  quarter allowance.   The  best  approach
for handling fourth quarter allowances  is still  under consider-
ation, as projected obligations f or .t he  f ourt h quarter are
a large share of the  FY  1986  budget  and ' sub stant i a I  flexi-
bility in t he movement of moniesamong  Regions will  be
required during the fourth quarter to ensure  proper fisca
ma nagement .

Adjusting or Amending the SCAP

     Obi i gat i on s cannot  be.^made  for  sites or activities which
do not appear on the SCAP.   Two  types of  *nod i f i cat i on s are
required to keep the plan current  during  the fiscal  year to
ensure that required fiscal  year expenditures are formalized
on the SCAP.

-------
                                                OSWER # 9840.0
      '- ~ _ -j 5~ TI a -. - 5  : \ ? - • * ' C 2 ~ i 31  "" C  ~ 9 3 3 C U 2 r t 5 r s '

      -rJjs~Tir^~3  2 ~ 2  T.c-:!f!r2~'3ns to  Tie  ? i 2 ~ .-/-.ici ie;t ner
z'-'-sr - •"= 3 ; ..•'• 3 ,  30,  an:  * A ,  Targets  set  forth in ~ ie
fi^2; •" Y  :9Sc SCAP  ncr  exceeo tie  Regional  advise of allow-
ance.  These  couM  be  considered  "minor"  alterations suci as
t r,e  snifT-ng  of monies  among  si~es or  activities es better
cost  estimates  are  availaoie  or supplementing ongoing projects
as need dictates.   Adjustments  do  not  require approval .  Head-
quarters  should be  notified  of  adjustments monthly by the
Branch Chief, in  conjunction  with  the  Waste  Management
Division  Director1s monthly  financial  transactions, report
submission.   A  simple  statement describing  the change will  be
sufficient to notify  Headquarters  of  the  change (e.g., add
SlOOK to  Site A RI/FS,  deduct SIOOK  from  Site 3 RI/FS; or,
deduct S100K  from Site  A  RI/FS, add  Site  B  to plan - sup-
plemental funding for  ongoing RI/FS  project  J100K; or,
deduct S50K from  SI budget,  add $50K  to  PA budget).1  Sub-
stitution of  RI/FS  projects  shown  on  the  plan are al so
considered adjustments  to the plan unless the project has
been  taken over by  a  potential  responsible party (see
discussion of PRP takeover  below).

      Amencments (Approval by  Headquarters)

      Because  of personnel and  financial  resource consider-
ations and Strategic  Planning and  Management System commit-
ments, modifications  of  the  SCAP which will   i n c r e a se or
decrease  the  new  start  targets  set forth in the FY  1986
SCAP  or would exceed  t he  Reg ions quarterlyadvice of allow-.
ance, require approval  by the AA-OSWER.   A letter describing
the  required  modification and why  the change  is needed will
be sent to the  AA-OSWER who  wi-ll  consider the change.

Substitution  of SCAP  Projects - PRP  Takeover
""^"^^™^^^""!^*"   """"™"™"™*™^i^•       """"^"^"""""
      The  FY  '986  remedial  portion  of  the SCAP will  oe aMowed
to exceed the current  remedial  budget in  anticipation that
some  remedial RI/FS and  RD/RA projects currently funded  on
tne  SCAP  will be  undertaken  by  responsible parties.  Planning
efforts must  be  sustained for all  future Fund Design/Construct
actions,  unless  satisfactory  agreement on future actions has
been  reached  with responsible parties.  Funding for RI/FS,
RD/RA projects  which  are removed from the plan because of PRP
assumption will revert  to Headquarters to further  reconcile
the  SCAP  with budget  during  the fiscal  year.
  if a State  assumes re sporfsi bi I i ty for fe,wer PAs and/or Sis
 than a Region  has planned, the FIT must pick up the  balance
 Regions  should  be sure to adjust their FIT Accomplishments
 Schedules to account for the added workload and notify
 Headquarters of  the change in  the Branch Chief's monthly
 reporT.

-------
                                                OSWER # 9840.0

He50CJ2r"-5."s Contingency Fund

     A portion o* the funding provided  in  the  FY  1936  remedial
budget * i i !  oe set aside to  *om  a  Headquarters Contingency
Fund - 2r fsur-n quarter ma nagerie n-  of 30,  and  RA  prefects.
The Contingency Fund will be  set  asioe  during  the  mio-ysar
review from the third and fourth  quarter regional  allowances.
This fund  will  be used both  as a  buffer  for  such  events as
RA cost increases due to differences  between government
cost estimates and actual bids, and cost increases during
construction due to changed  field conditions or discovery
of more extensive contamination,  and  as a  means for ensuring
full utilization of FY 1996  Remedial  Funds.

     During the fiscal year,  it is  essential that  each
Region no+ only operate within its  approved  plan  but  al so
apply sound fiscal  management procedures to  red uce proj ect
co st growt h.  Unanticipated  cost  increases in  any  Region
could affect the SCAP for other Regions.   Eac h Reg i on  mu st
attempt to resolve internally any funding  problems within
the Regional  allowance before requesting additional  funds
from the Contingency fund.

The Semi-Annual  and Third Quarter Review

     Two reviews are anticipated  during the  fiscal  year.
The serr \ -a nnua I  review will  be held toward the end of  the
second quarter, at which time the SCAP  will  be amended and
a thiro quarter advice of allowance will be  developed.
Anot.her review will be held  toward  the  end of  the third
quarter to ensure coord ination and  year-end  fiscal  manage-
ment.

Region,.I  Contingency Fund

     RI/F3 project costs -can  vary due to changed  conditions
or the need for additional work by  the  contractor.  Therefore,
Regions are encouraged to develop a contingency  fund  for Rl/FS
budgets.  Contingency amounts should  range from  5-10  percent
of the individual  site Rl/FS  oudget,  depending on the expecteo
complexity of the project.   The contingency  amount shall be
carried as a line  item in the plan, as  shown  on  the remedial
format.

Community  Relations

     To support the Community Relations planning  effort, up
to $6,000  is available in contract  support for each site
scheduled  for Rl/FS funding*" in FY 1985. Jn  addition, other
sites not  targeted for Rl/FS  action  in  FY  .1985 may need
community  relations planning  monies and should be  submitted
along with other requests.

-------
                                                OSWER f 9840.0
                                               a c t i ,/ i ~ i 2 s

evaiiao'e in cor-~r.»c~  soppo-~  *or  acTlvi-ies  sue n  as ''scoping
•neeTings", - zz~  sneers,  responsiveness  summaries,  pub' ic
->cr;::es, 3->2 ree-'n:  'ogistits.  Requests  over  S'5,0'00  ior
Community Re:ar'on s projects w i > ;  ae  handled  on  a  case-sy-case
basis.  Regions  may undertake  community  relations  activities
without the use  of contractor  support.

Forward Planning Activities

     The goals/objectives  for  forward planning  activities are:
(I) development  of technical/financia I  information to support
"equests fo-- funcs for  subsequen*  remedial  planning or
remedial action  activities; (2)  evaluation of the  extent
and utility of available data  and  identification  of additional
data needs; (3)  identification  of  administrative  or pro-
cedural problems that may  affect project implementation;
and (•*) Federal-lead  workpl an  devel opment.

     Forward planning may  be performed  at  sites with RI/FS
projects on the  Fr 1936  SCAP.   Sites  without  an existing
RAMP and with  an RI/FS  scheduled to start  after FY 1986 are
also eligible.   For State-lead  sites, this may  consist  of
preparing a Statement of Work  and  request  for proposal s or
other related  activities (note that this may  ultimately be
implemented .with the  mul.ti-sMte cooperative agreement).
For Federal-lead si-tes,  this may consist of activities
leading up to  and  including work plan preparation  required
by the REM contracts, under already established procedures.

     Forward planning activities generally will  be limited
to sites on either the  proposed  or final  NPL.  In  rare
circumstances,  forward  planning may be  allowed  at  candidate
NPL si-1-es.

Corps of Engineers Design  and  Technical  Assistance

     Task assignments should be issued  to  the COE  to expedite
their  involvement  during the RI/FS and  RD  phases of Federal-
i ead projects.   Generally,  a $10,0.00  technical  assistance
assignment  should  be  initiated during RI/FS and a  $7,000
design assistance  assignment  should be  initiated as tne
draft RI/FS is made public.

Multi-Site Cooperative  Agreements

     States may  choose  to  include  in  MSCA applications one
or more pre-NPL, remedial , ^r  enforcement remedial invest-
i gat i on/f ea si b i I i ty  study  activities  at orfe or more  sites.
This approach  will enable  States to negotiate a variety of
agreements  ranging from one type of response activity at
one or more sites, to including all  fundable activiti.es at

-------
  T 2 - O ;j S 3 ' ~ •= 3
     etel
                                                OSWER ft 9840.0
v ' ~ * : •» 3 ; ~-2* 2 .   ^2^80 ' 2 •  2 "C 3 '. '. - W a D !. 6
! / ' ~ ' 3 s r c r 3 n •/  5 : ~ s , * : r « n i c i rne^e is 3
'•"anacer.s nr
a n 'SMP/, 'nay se inc! uaed-in an
     The scope of activities whiz* may  &s  oefformed  under  a
cooperative agreement  include  preliminary  assessments,  site
inspections ana other  pre-NPl  activities;  forward  planning;
State-lead RI/FS/RD/RA/O&M; management  assistance  during
Federal-lead RI/FS/RO/RA (including other  Federal  agency
RI/FS/RD); State enforcement-lead RI/FS; and oversight  of
PRP RI/FS/RD.   The Region  should  specifically  identify  which
sites/activities will  oe funded under a MSCA vehicle.

CERCLA Supplemental  for 3012 Program

     In the latter part of FY  1984, CERCLA monies  were  first
made available for supplementing  the 3012  program.   In  FY
1935, approximately $6 million  in additional CERCLA  monies
will be made available.

The Region should identify any  FY 1935  needs  in  the  remedial
format.

Remedial  Contractor Workload
     Based on I eve I-of-effort projections  to  complete.the
Federal-lead projects assigned through  FY  1985,  remedial '
resources under the two R-EM/FlT co.ntracts  wil!  be  fully
committed.  Activities during FY  1986  should  be  limited
to completing ongoing work assignments.  Exceptions to
this are noted below.  Every effort must be made to complete
all  ongoing projects by the contract termination date of
September 30, 1986.

     Federal-lead RI/F5 and support projects  scheduleo tor
FY 1986 should be distributed between the  Camp,  Dresser, and
McKee (COM) contract (REM  II) and  the two  new contracts
(Zone 1, Regions  1-4; Zone 2, Regions  5-10) to be  awarded
auring FY 1985.   We expect the new contracts  to  be operational
during the 1st Quarter of  FY 1986.  Based  on  this  schedule,
FY 1986 workload  should be distributed  as  follows.

    • At least 50J of all  new RI/FS projects  (both Program
      and Enforcement) should be  assigned  to  the COM REM  I I
      contract.

    o The remaining new RI/FS projects  should be targeted  for
      the respective new contractor.   First quarter assignments
      should be limited to one or  two  projects,  with the re-
      mainder coming in  subsequent quarters.

    « Assignments to the existing  REM/FIT  contracts should
      be limited  to the following:

-------
                                    OSWER # 9840.0

       "-3  *yndi*.: f o~ on-cc'nc ^r^'ec^s  TO ccve'"^^
                  S           3    j             ^m
scope ^a-es.                                   ^
     ,n.-/ Relations imp!ementation *or ongoing
Sma • :  second operaoie un;^ projects a^  si'as
where REM/FiT performed the original work.
These orojects must be started during the  first
quarrer, and completed no later than September
I 986.
Minor forward planning, community relations, or
oversight projects in support of State-lead
sites which can be completed by September  1986.
                                           v
  o Support project.s tor fo~*a^d D :. a-siinc  ( pa-t i cu ' a r t
    Federal-lead sites), community relations, and  State  ana
    PRP oversight should be distributed between  COM and  the
    new contractor consistent with RI/FS assignments and
    overaI I  workload.

  • RD projects  in support of State-lead RA's or for small
    Federal-lead remedial actions can  be assigned  either
    to COM or the new contractor.  (For the  Fe-dera! -1 ead
    projects the Corps of Engineers will direct  and oversee
    the design work and carry the project  through the  RA
    p ha se .

  9 Project assignments for COM  s-hould  be  screened  for pote
    ti    conflict-of-interest  problems through'  the COM
    Reg-ionai  coordinator. A similar screening will  be  requi
    for projects to be assigned  to the  new contractors one©
    the selections-are announced.

  « Sm-!!  IRM's  (not assigned to the Corps)  should  be  assigned
    teethe COM contract. (Small  IRM's  for  sites  where  NUS or
    CH2M Hill prepared the the focused  FS  can be assigned to
    The same contractor provided the work  can oe compleTec no
    Iater than 9/30/36.)

     HSCO also wii!  be competing a smaller remedial  planning
support contract among small, disadvantaged  businesses.  Our
 arget is to perform 5-8 Federal-lead  RI/FS  projects per year
under this contract.  We expect,  to award this contract during
FY 1986, and we  will be working  with the Regions to identify
two or three candidate sites to  assign  to  this  contractor.

Additional  Projects

     There is a  need for a reserve of  additional  projects to
substitute projects whicK*ere taken over by  RP's or delayed.
Although additional  RI/FS starts may be Identified, listing
additional projects is especially importa-nt  for  RO and RA
activities.  These projects should be  listed in  the space
provided on the  remedial format.  For  new  starts, projects
should be listed in priority order determined  by the site
management plans.


-------
  :••:=. 94
 • INDICATES *IRST FUNDING AT SITE »OR  STATED ACTIVITY
                                                                                              OSKER  # 9840.0
 SITE
                            e
                            A
HORCSTAME MINING

MIDLAND WHJDUCTS
                        ST  0   ACTHUTY
           1ULTT-
            SZT    :ON-
          PUNDINC   THAC-
      TY  VEHICLE   TOR
OLD INCER OIL
PREHITT REFINERY
SIHES DISPOSAL PIT
SOUTH VAU-EY
TAB CREEK/OTTAWA


TRIANGLE CHEMICAL






UNITES CREOSOTINO


UNITED NUCLEAR


VTRTAC
- LA -


• NH -


• NH -  9 SITES


- OK - 19 SITES


- OK - 1* SITES


* T» - S3 SITES


~ TX - 99 SITES        TX  S


-*eeiOMM. CONTINGENCY


                •REGION O* TOTAL*  • 369H8OO. OO
SI
QUARTER Iff
OBLICATIC*
12. OpO
/ °
x^y°°s
c
110. 000
OUAftTER II 9UARTER III OUAflTER IV
OBLIGATION OBLIGATION OBLIGATION «^
nnc.
0
^^^ 0
6.000
0
^.^ 0
so. ooo
6.000
0
169. OOO
0
0
0
430.000
0
0
O
12. 000
770. 000
0
0
0
O
6.000
9OO. OOO
18. 000
0
O
O
0
0
O.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SO. 000
4. 900. 000
0
0
0
0
0
1. 900.000
0
o
0
0
0
                               *o. ooo
0
0
4O. OOO
0
o
0
9. 4OO
0
32.400
13*. 479 *
19. OOO
•a. 400
27. OOO
270.098
o
.-**•
0
S*. 000
0
o
o
109. OOO
12.000
to. ooo
o
o
o
o
0
0
0
0
99.4OO
999.684 f
84'. OOO
0
100.000
0
0
0
0
0
84*400
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.300.000
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
o
o
0
0
0
0
o
o
o
                            4.439.916
                                         9. 941,
3*3. we   i*. S7&. OOO

-------
                                                              OSWER # 9840.0
                        =ROGR.->,-. TARGET PROJECTS:  RESIGN


*First Activity Obligation
Site Name State
Bu sted 8 i m
-orri ole L/F

Miaana Marsh


New Found Sound
Eyesore
Contriver si al
Gross
Nasty'
No Probi em Haul ing
Deadl y Dust

Ma & Pa Env. Services
LO
LO

LO


NS
PE
PE
PE
PE
PE
SN

SN


(FAO)
Lead Activity
S
S
s
s


F
S .
S
S
S
c
F

S
RI/FS*
Rl/FS
RD*
RI/FS
RD*
RA*
RI/FS*
' RI/FS*
Rl/FS*
Rl/FS*
RI/FS*
RA
RD
RA*
RI/FS
Mul ti-
Site (SK)
Funding .Probable Quarter
Vehicle 1 2 3
MSCA X
MSCA 1 50
MSCA
MSCA 125
MSCA X
MSCA
X
MSCA X
MSCA X
MSCA X
MSCA X
1.000 •
40
X
210
                           FILLING OUT THE FORM

     Sites on the FY 1987 portion of the SCAP are arrangeo  alphabetically by
State.  "New" sites are designated by an asterisk in  the  activity category.
The quarter in which the obligation for "New" site activity (first  activity
obligation) i s most likely to occur is shown  by placing an  X beneath the proper
quarterly columns 1-4.  "New" sites are designated by an  asterisk.   Incremental
funding for on-going remedial  actions, including second operable units (see
definition of operable un'ut page 41), are shown on the plan in  the  proper  .
quarter as an estimated dollar amount.

-------
                               OSKER ft 9840.0

    j Nl£T?:'JC" i.ONS  -1s-  COMPLETING Tr.£  gv  '5S"  PROJECT LIST

     Tnis yea.- as  par*  of  r-,e SCAP  we  are  asking  tna~ you
provide a preliminary  ; ; ST • n g of  your  anticipated  =Y '.967
projects.  Xe bei isve  t-ni s  i s an  important  part of your
curren- planning process.   in putting  together  the FY '.986
SCAP, you need to  be tninking about the  outyear workload
requirements.  You al so  need to coordinate  with your States
to ensure that each  of  the projects will  oe ready  to start
(or move on to the next  phase) as scheduled.   If  you have
a good  site management  planning process,  the  preparation
of FY 1987 project list  will be relatively  simple.

     For new starts, t ne  plan is  focusing  discussions towe^o
WHICH S IT£S will be  I i kely cand idates  for  the f i seal  year .
Although cost is an  important consideration in  the selection
of new activity  starts  for the fiscal  year, it  is recognized
that cost estimates  will  be  uncertain, as many  CY 1987
candidates may presently  be  in the  early  RI/FS  stage. Accord-
ingly, no dollar values  need be assigned  to the activity
for first activity obligations.   Cost  estimates will  oe
developed for new "starts  on  the FY  1987  Plan  as the FY 1987
fiscal year draws closer.   Incremental funding  neeos (includin
second operable units)  should be  sho*n on  the plan as estimate:
d oi Iar amount s.

     RI/FS candidate sites which  meet  the  tentative FY 1987
target shown on p. 13  should be selected  in collaboration
with the States.  These  sites are prel iminary selections
and  may change because  of  site conditions or  otner site-relate
situations which may ari se over the next  two  years.

     Projects where  planning activities  (RI/FS, RO'V are
presen^Iy on-going or which  will  be started during FY 1985
will comprise the majority of candidate  sites for RD or RA
in FY 1987..  To develop  the  SY 1987 SCAP,  pipeline projecr
completion dates for planning activities (RI/FS, RD) shouio
be examined and evaluated for accuracy.   These  completion
estimates will  be critical to making.-! n formed choices for
the fiscal  year.  Be sure to include the  time required to
move the activity through established  management  systems,
including the Record of  Decision  and competitive procurement
of contractors by the State  and Army Corps of Engineers.

     A list of potential candidate  sites is provided for
your use as Appendix B.  This list  has been constructed
using projected completion dates  for remedial planning
activities currently underway and standard  timel ines for
the start and completion c**  remedial activities.  This list
should be viewed as  an  effort to  comprehensively list projects
which have been  started  in your region and  are  potentially
eligible for further remedial activity.   These  lists should
be altered as necessary  to properly represent your best FY
1987 Plan.

-------
                                             OSWER § 9840-0
SITE/STATE
Skunk
Skunk
Skunk
Skunk
Skur^k
S<:J".*
Hoi
Hoi
Hoi
Hoi
Hoi
Hol
OW,
OW,
OW,
OW,
OW,
OW,
NZ
NZ
NZ
NZ
NZ
NZ
TYPE

RI/FS
RI/FS
RD
RD
RA
RA
^
^
A
D
-Y -.966
QUARTER
COMPLETE
1234
Fv 195"
QUARTER
COMPLETE
1234
• : SCAL
OUT- YEAR
COMPLETE
38 89 90
                             F
                             F
                             F
                             p
                             r
                                                                         COMMENT

                                                                      Drum 0' spcsai
                                                                      SI urry  Vsal !
                                                                      Drum Di spos
                                                                      Slurry  Wai I
                                                                      Drum Di sposc
                                                                      Si i.--,-  we! '
                                 Instructions

     To nore accurately assess annual  resource needs and  for workload  analysis
and workyear distribution, information about remedial  project status must  be
provided for all ongoing RI/FS, including RI/FS under aoministrative consent
order, and ongoing RD and RA projects whether Federal  or  RP financed.   Provide
the above-! i sted information for al I  sites where monies were obi igated through FY
1984, where obligations are expected  during FY 1985, and  where RP  oversight  is
expected to be needed during FY 1986.  List the expected  quarter and fiscal  year
for the completion of the activity, or out-year when the  activity  will  be  completec

     As shown in-the example, remedial  actions at sites are often  separated  into
operable units .which'may require separate feasibility studies, RODs, designs,  and
remedial actions,  if mul itiple operable unrts are required at the site,  I i st  th©
completion of each operable unit separately and provioe a several  word description
of the action type in the comment field.

Def i nit ions

1.  "Complete" ^or activity types:
    RI/FS


    RD


    RA
           'The quarter in *hich tne Draft ROD wi'i  be senr to Headquarters or
            forwarded to the Regional  Admin i sTrator for Decision, if  delegated.

            For Federal-I ead , contract for itnpl ementation is advertised  for bids.
            For State-lead, design and specifications approved by EPA.

            The operable unit is being monitored or operated to ascertain the
            performance of the operable unit.  If the operable unit i s the last
            operable unit, the entire remedial  action is in performance  monitoring
            prior to instituting deletion procedures.  (In essence, the  .date of
            final acceptance and beneficial occupancy.)
    For oversight of
    RP RA.
                     RP actions, as activity types, use RP RI/FS, RP RD,  and

-------
                                                            OSWER # 9840.0

                                                            OSWER # 9840.0
A comporan* or a cosT-effacr I ve remedial  '"esponse t:iat  TV  itsei*  el'imi na'-ss
or iiitigaTes a -s'aase or "hrea^.of rsiease and  neeas no addi^iona!  action
to perform l"s f unction.  Examples Include: Off- site Transfer  anc aisposa'
of drums; draining surface impoundments;  construction of crainage controls;
installation of slurry walls (and/or clay caps); provision  of  alternative
water supplies; construction and operation of  groundwater treatment  systems.
An operable unit would not include: fencing or other site  security;  repacking
of drums on-site without further actions to treat or dispose of the  waste;
or installation of a cap and/or barrier wall  that require groundwater
treatment to be effective.

-------
                                                      OSWER # 9840.0

                     OF  ACCCM=.:SHME\I-  SCHEDULE:  rr  1965
Act!v i ty
'y Schedule of Projected Activities
FIT Hours & Subcontracting S

 FY 1986 Reporting Quarter

   1          2        3      4
Tota
Remedi a I
I nve st i ga t i on

Prel i mi nary
Assessment s

Site
In spect i on s

NPL Support

-MRS Scoring

-Qua I i ty Cfv- cki ng

-Resp to Comments

F e d era! Facilities

-S i te In spr t i on
-HRS Scoring/OC
           *
Pi ox i n Strategy

-Fi eld Work

Enforcement
Support

-Field Work
-Cleanup oversight
-Legal  Records mgt

Other (i dent i fy)
TotaI  Requi red
 FIT Hour s
 (Subcontract $)

-------
                                                     OSWER * 9840.0
                                               - =
                    FY 1986 Reporting Quarter
                                                         Total
Enforcemenr-
Remedia I
I n ve st i ga~ i on

PreI  i mi na ry
Assessment s

S.ite
 i n spect i on s

 NPL  Support

 -HRS Scori ng

 -Qua I  i ty Check i ng

 -Resp to Comments

 Federal Facilities

  -Si te In specti on
  -HRS  Scori «g/QC

  Pi oxi n  Strategy

  -Fi eld Work
   -Field  Work
   -Cleanup  oversight
   -Legal  Record s mgt
   Other (identify)
   Total Required
    Ft T Hour s
    (Subcontract  $)

-------
page 44 - addition
                                                  'Oavuc*n." IT
Definitions

SITE INSPECTION FOLLOW-UPS (SIF)

     The purpose of site inspection follow-ups (SIF) is to
collect additional data at a site that is necessary to
substantiate or strengthen an existing HRS score.  It is
considered a second phase of a SI and is conducted inde-
pendently of the initial SI.  If the site is listed on the
NFL, this more detailed information will be collected
during the remedial investigation.

     In developing the workplan and identifying sites for
SIF funding, the Recior* should carefully evaluate if it
would be easier, more cost effective and faster to task
the EPA FIT to conduct SIFs.  The FIT is fully equipped
and has subcontracting capabilities to support most of the
technological and funding needs to conduct a SIF.  Use of
the FIT would allow the State to focus on PAs and Sis.


MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE (MA)

     Funding for management assistance (MA), formerly reserved
for remedial activities, is now available for Regionally per°
formed PAs, Sis, and HRS scores.  The purpose of MA-is to
provide the State with the opportunity to review EPA-lead PA,
SI, and HRS scores.  MA contributes additional information
that may change the disposition or score of a site and also
may help to maintain the cooperative nature of the PA/SI
program.

-------
                                                         OSWER ft 9840.0
                               - 44  -
     DISCUSSION OF FIT ACCOMPLISHMENT  SCHEDULE

          The FIT Schedule  is designed to obtain  information  on
     the use of the FIT resources  in achieving the  overalI  Regional
     Superfund goals.  Regionsmust  submit the Accomplishments
     Schedule as a planning tool to promote effective  management
     of the FIT.  This planning  schedule  should  be  updated  at the
     end of each quarter and provided  to Headquarters.   This  will
     assist Headquarters and the Regions TO evaluate  shifts in
     FIT use that could affect SCAP output requirements.  Head-
     quarters will be monitoring each  Region's quarterly  usa^e of
     the FIT through reports from  the  contractors.

     Definitions

     Prel iminary Assessment (PA)

          A preliminary assessment  (PA)  is the off-site  review of
     available information about a  site  for the  purpose  of  deter-
     mining if futher action, such  as  site  inspection, or no
     further action is needed*.   A  PA i s  completed when  it is
     approved by a responsible EPA  Region official.   The  SCAP
     general Iy establ i shes that  targeted PAs  are  performed  under
     under the 3012 program.  The  Region may  complete more  PAs,
     provided Rl and SI targets  are  satisfied, but  this  effort
     must be closely coordinated with  work performed  by  the
     States under 3012 or CERClA cooperative  agreements.

     Site I n sp e c t i o n ( S I )

          The site inspection (SI)  builds upon the  information
     gathered during the PA and  includes on-site  collecting and
     developing data from the field.   For purposes  of  FIT planning
     or reporting, the SI is completed when  it is approved  by a
     responsible EPA Region official.  On-site or off-site  work
     at a site already included  on  the NPL does  not  qualify as  a
     Site Inspection.  For those sites not on the NPL but where
     follow up work is carried out, the  inspection  is an  addendum
     to the original  SI and does not qualify  as  an  additional  SI
     for CERCLIS.  A site visit  without  sample collection can
     qualify as an SI if it is determined that sufficient analytical
     data are available to serve as the  basis for HRS scoring.

          The SCAP will establish  a minimum  number  of  Sis to  be
     completed.  Regions may elect  to  conduct more  than  the targeted
     number provided other targets for Rl and PA  are  met.

Remedial Investigations

     The majority of FIT RIs will  continue to be  in support of
Enforcement.  Headquarters enforcement will  be working with the
Regions to determine which RIs will  be conducted  by FIT  and will
project a total  of estimated cost  for  FIT work,  including subcontracting

-------
                                                      OSWER 3 S840.0
•'   5 - - c-r terve -.7 tscn-T-c3'  s-cso"*  ?or  7 he se  si*es,  c*-er>  T na n .
f e a s; 3 ; ! ! T y  st j c i 2 s, m u 3~  ;• s   T c '. j a e G  <• * t n i r  T r>e  V;  *» o r * p ! a n .
S:- *s SD«C;^'C workpians  *o--  some  of * he  Ris  have  a'rsacy  been
c DIRS i etec . ' ~ ne co st oud ga* 5  9-3^3 o ; i shed  i n  ~ ^e  ^or -

ecj;9 *c ceTsrmir-.e ~!T COSTS. 'scera! Faci'ities Susro^t FIT may be involved in a variety of activities related to Federal agencies. This might include special site inspection, HRS scoring, and remedial oversight. Hazard RanKing System/NPL Support FIT involvement in HRS will vary throughout the year depending on schedules determined by the NPL program. FIT may be requested to score sites, quality check sites scored by States and Regions and assist in the response to comments on sites proposed to be added to the NPL. These potential F.IT activities should be estimated based on discussions with the appropriate Regional NPL per sonne! . I mp I ementat i OP. 'of Dicxin Strategy FIT activities on dioxin strategy projects-wi1 I vary from Region to Region. Some Regions have already begun to task FIT for collection of samples in Tier 1 and 2 studies and/or used FIT subcontracting resources to obtain support for such projects. FIT efforts on these tasks should be scheduled based on Regional estimates of dioxin activities. Note that any dioxin work initiated or performed by the FIT must be reported in category oo the Monthly Report and must not appear in more generic category. The actual tier level of work a I so be i nd i cated . the dioxin a S I or should TES can now be used to support sample collection. Request this support should be handled as for other TES requests. s completion of dioxin for The SCAP tracks the initiation as well; a activities as indicated on the tracking forms. Enforcement Support Enforcement offices rely on FIT to provide technical support for enforcement cases. This includes field activities, oversight activities, legal records mana.genrent, and othe^case support act i v i t i e s.


-------
                                                       QSWER # 9840.0
     F ;'T ' s  2 z ' ' '• ty  TO ; -r ~ • o r m a w > j e variety  of  ~ec nr. i ca !  f u P. c ~ : c;
has Tiace  •-  a  very  popgi=r  -esource.  Each Region  na s  special
pro^ec's  «.-!icn -nay  requi-e  r:T assistance, parricuiar'y enfo'ceme'
support acTiviriss.   Scheauling of  these will  be  based  on  each
Region's  needs.   Note that  while the Regions  can  use FIT resource
to assist ;n any  p'=i-!-ig activities for sites,  REM  resources are
also available for  this type of support.

-------
                                                     OSWER £ 9840.0
     i e e
                    nr Reporr:nc
I.    PRP RESPONSE/REIMBURSEMENT ACTIONS INITIATED THIS QUARTER1

     A.  Site/State2
     9.  Settlement Document^
     C .  -. -j s 2 c- r! s £- •' ? 6 • ~ r. L: r s e " % n t A c ~ ! v ; * v
     Do  $ Value of Response
     Eo  $ Reimbursement to Superfund;  Status
     F.  Compl iance Status^

II.  ONGOING PRP RESPONSE ACTIONS REQUIRING OVERSIGHT^

     A.  Site/State2
     B.  Settlement Document^
     C.  Response Activity^
     D.  Compl iance Status^
     E.  Method and Frequency of Compliance Method Efforts

III. PRP RESPONSE/REIMBURSEMENT ACTIONS COMPLETED THIS QUARTER1

     A ."  'S: e/State2
     B.  Settlement Document^
     C.  Response Activity4
     D.  $ Value of Response
     E.  $ Reimbursement to Superfund; Status

IV.  JUDIC.AL ACTIONS COMPLETED THIS QUARTER'1
           x
     A.  Site/State2
     3.  Type of Action  ($106/5107)
     C.  Nature of Judgment6

V.    ACTIVE FILED OR DOJ REFERRED  JUDICIAL  ACTIONS1

     A.  Site/State2
     B .  RCRA/CERCLA Claims
     C.  Status7

VI.  ONGOING RI/FS AT FEDERAL OR STATE ENFORCEMENT-LEAD  SITES1

     A.  Site/State2          ^
     B.  Status/Completion Date               »
VII. NEGOTIATIONS COMPLETED  THIS  QUARTER
                                         1
     A.  Site/State2
     B.  Response/Reimbursement  Activity4
     C.  Outcome

-------
                                                    OSKER * 9840.0
                            ^-:5TiCS  : T-. 5 QUAR"^; CUMULATIVE)

                              NPL      Nor.-NPL      NPL      Non-NP
                            thi s OTR   -hi s GTS   -o Dare    TO  Sa~
     Not C! a ssi f i ed
     Fund Lead
     Fund Lead - Negotiate
     £ nf orc.eme nt-Lead
     State-Lead
IX.  DiOXIN ACTIONS COMPLETED THIS QUARTER1

     A.  Response Actions - Tiers  la,  Ma

         1 .  Si-a/State
         2.  Statu s

     3.  Response Actions - Tiers  II!  - VII

         1.  Si te/State
         2.  Status


X.   FEDERAL FACILITY ACTIONS THIS QUARTER1

     A.  Number of Federal Facility Sites on NPL  (Report  Annually)
     B   Rl/FS initiated at Federal Facility Sites

         1 .  Si te/State1
         2.  Status
          s
     C.  Administrative Actions  Initiated at Federal  Facility  Sites

         1 .  Site/State2
         2 .  Statu s

     D.  Federal  Facility Response Actions Completed

         1 .  Site/State2
         2.  Status

     E.  Federal  Facility Sites  Referred to HQ/OFA

         1.  Site/State2      ^
         2.  Status                          »

-------
                                                   OSWER * 9840.0
'.  A separate rgDort  should be prepared  for eacn  si*e.

2.  Indicate wnetner site  is on NPL or  is unlisted.

3.  Settlement document types are consent  decree s,. admi-n i strat i ve
    orders on consent, unilateral administrative orders,  and
    judicial orders.

4.  Ca tec sr i e 5. of response activities  include  removal, RI/FS,
    RD, RA, ana reimoursemenr (cost recovery).

5.  Provide status of  cornel iance with  the settlement  document,
    i.e., in compliance, out of compliance,  compliance  status
    uncertain, ana the anticipated completion  date  for  response
    action/reimbursement.

6.  Indicate nature of court decision;  relief  obtained  including
    nature of injunctive relief granted  and/or  cost  recovery
    j udgment.

7.' Indicate whether case  is filed or  referred  to  OOJ,  and filing
    or I i t i gat i on sc he d uIe .

-------
                                                      OSWER # 9840.0
      IT  2 d 3 i T i c n  - c  The  2 c * '• v ! T i e s * h i c ~i  are  piannsa  unoer the SCAP
 several  otr^er e n f or ceme i* ac"ivi"!es will  fee  repcrtec  as pa'*  :> •
 T ne 5C.V? process  on  a  quarter! y  Da sis.  These activities a re
 described below.  Consideration  will be given TO  direct reporting
 of These activities  into OSWER management  information  systems  in
 the future.   Forms are provided  separately  in this document for
 reporting this enforcement  information.

 I .  °RP  Response/Reimbursement Initiated  This Quarter

    Under tnis category Regions  w 1 : I reporr  p - i v a - e p e - 1 y re s? c • ? •
 actions  (o.r reimbursement to the HSRTF) obtained  during t ne repcr~
 quarter  through either Consent Decrees, Consent AOs,  unilateral AOs,
 or judicial  orders with whicn  there  is compliance.  For each,
 information snould be  provided on  the  "Activity"  undertaken
 (Ri/FS,  removal,  remedial), the  esTimated  cost of  the  response
 action being  undertaken and the  amount of  money being  reimbursed
to the HSRTF .  InformaTion on  reimbursement  to the HSRTF should
 include  status (i.e.,  received or  date due).

      In addition, information  is to  be provided on unilateral
orders issued during the reporting quarter  where  respondents
either did not comply  or where compliance  status is uncertain.
The status column should reflect such  events as initiation o*
fund *inanced response, initiation. of  $106  judicial  actions to
enforce the order or other  information as appropriate.
                                                                »

 I I .  Ongoing PRP  Response Requiring  Oversight

     This category is  a measure  of the workload, the Region will
carry over 'i nto t-he  next quarter to  oversee  private party response
actions.  These actions  should be  initiated  either during or
previous to the reporting quarter  and  not  completed.   Therefore,
they will require continued oversight  activities.   Regions should
report response actions being  undertaken  pursuant  to  settlements
 (con sent decrees  or.  A-.O.s on consenT)  ana  unilateral  admin i st rat i ve
orders.  The  "Status"  column  should  briefly  reflect the status of
 compliance and progress towards  completion  of the  response actions,
 including the anticipated date of  completion  of the response
actions.  Regions should al so  report the  method used  to monitor
 status of compl iance and how often compl iance i s monitored.


 III. PRP Re spon se/Rei mbur sement,. Compl eted  This Quarter
                                              i
     Under this category, Regions  will report cleanups actually
completed during  the reporting quarter which will  consequently
require no further oversight.  As  above,  information  should be
provided for  response  actions  being  undertaken pursuant to both
 settlements or unilateral admin istrative  orders.   This MST should

-------
                                                     OSWLR £ 9840.0


             •=scs."!se 2c~'c"'3 : "i: -'• 3~ec b J P^Fs -'u'ino tie
 •q j3 r- 5.-  * ~ i c n *e ~e a '. so ccmp-etec.  ! i 2C d i t i c n ,  t ne ca *a  s ncu i
 inc'-jde  i n f ortia r ; on on re i mbur semen- to t ne HSRTr.

 iV.   guc;c;3s  Actions Ccmoietea
      This category includes information concerning Judgments
 obtained  in Federal  District Courts, Bankruptcy Courts, and
 Magistrates concern!ng claims filed under CERCLA ana RCRA for
 Superfund sites.  Details concerning the nature and the judicial
 action  and court judgment (injunctive relief, Superfund cost
 - r. co ve --y } obtained should be pr'oviaed.


 V .    Active Filed or Referred Judicial Actions

      This category is a measure of the workload the Region will
 carry over into the .next quarter related to already referred  and
 filed "active" cases.  Active cases are defined forthis purpose
 to  exclude any case which has been  settled as to all claims  raised
 in  the  complaint (even if oversight of that settlement  is ongoing),
 and any case which has been withdrawn or dismissed.  Settlea
 cases may in some instances be considered active if disputes
 arise in  the settlement which will  be litigated, and therefore
 require litigation support.


 V I .  Ongoing R I /FS at FederaI  Or Ste*e Enforcement  Lead Sites
•
      This category is a measure of the workload the Region will
 carry over into the next quarter to oversee Federal enforcement
 managed Rl/FS projects.  The list  should include all  such Ri/FS
 being undertaken by the federal contractor which were  initiated
 during  or p/r i or to the reporting quarter and which  have not  yet
 been  comoleted.  The  status and schedule for workplan  completion
 and anticipated completion date for each project  should be no'ec.


 VII.  Negotiations Completed This Quarter

      The Annual  Plan tracks only negotiations to be  initiated for
 response activities.  This category will show which negotiations
 were  completed during the reported  quarter, whether they  were
 initiated during the  reporting quarter or  some  previous quarter.
 Regions should note the "Activity"  being negotiated  (removal  RI/FS,
 RD/RA,  reimbursement) and the outcome of the negotiations (Succes-
 sful/Settlement; Unsuccessful/Federal Iy  Financed Response  Initiatec
 Unsuccessful /Judicia I or Admihfstrative  Actiop  Initiated).
 VIM.  Site Classification

      Under this category, Regions  will  report information on how
 NPL sites are classified under the Site Classification System.

-------
                                                      OSWER * 9840.0
;^f;»-T5~i;--' -v :  '  -~  ~r.»S3."»*.30  On  "~ "*6 ^> UTC OS <~ O * S ' ~~.3 S i"1 "3 3 C •"!
category io."  ~ 10 se  si~es  class', fiac  our IT 9 r ;ie repcrrinc ->eriDC
(genera!;/  s:~es  for  which  responsible p 2 r * y se arc he 5 * e r e
completes)  anc  on r MS  cumulative  lumber of NPL siTes in each
category.   ; n 3 c o i " 1 o n , Regions snculd a^^acM an up^atea Ms* or
the classification  for  eacn NPL site in their Region.


I X .  Dioxin Activity  Completions

     Under  this category. Regions will  report sites where dioxin
-•-- spo" «•? ?c~'--s  have  been  completed during the repof^ing quarter.
T ne S C AP" t r a c K s' T ne  q u a r 7 e r of  i r, i T , a - o n c - " ~ e = e = c - ' v : - i  ~ -
and completion  of PRP  searches and  information gathering acrivsTits


X .   Federal  Faci I ity  Actions

     In FY  1986,  actions  will  be  tracked involving federal  facility
sites on the  NPL.   This reporting category requests information
concerning  federal  facility sites on the NPL (annual report); Ri./FS
initiated at  federal  facility  sites; administrative actions
initiated at  federal  facility  sites; community relations activities
initiated at  sites;  response actions completed at federal facility
sites; and, federal   facility sites that have been referred  for
action pursuant to  any  appropriate  executive order to- Headquarter1 s
Office of Federal Activities.

-------
                                                                OSKSR # 9840.0
For *^e CL? only, proviae ouarrer iy projections of samples py "vps
of analysis.

                             Quarter

                       (Number of Samples)
Tyse of Analysi s

Organics
1 norgan i cs
Dioxin (CERCLA)
Special Analytical
Services (SA'£-.
TOTAL
Ql






$2






Q3






04






TOTAL







-------
Please complete the chart below  tor  annual  analytical  support services projections by Activity and by
laboratory resource.
                                f-'Y 1986 Analytical  Support Sor vices Projections
Activity
Preliminary Assessment
Site Inspections
(Included field invest.)
RI/FS - New Start (NS)
Underway (U)
Remedial Design - NS
T
- U
Remedial Action - NS
- U
NPL Deletion
«b
0 4 M
Removal
RCRA Site Inspections
Other*
TOTAL
Reg I ona 1
Target














Avg. Samples
Per Sifte














Federal lead Sites
CLP














HSO Lah






•







RCM/FIT Lab














Other"














St^le Lead Sites
CLP














Statfe Labs














01 hoi *














Please specify other activities  and  other labs.

                                   .;,!.:, total  annual samples antictpal'id tor each
                                                                                                                    9
                                                                                                                    VO
                                                                                                                    CD
                                                                                                                     o
                                                                                                                     o
                                                                                          in  the Hoyion.

-------
                                    OSWER # 9840.0
            APPENDIX A




FY 1986  ENF-ORCEMENT PROGRAM PLAN

-------
                                                       OSWER # 9840.0
                        oii'E.  LL.-vdsS
                                   a: Rr-'VAL ORDERS
ANNUAL
SITE/ STATE
                                       FY B6  QUARTEr




                        NFL   TYPE   ',    I     \      I

-------
                                                                       OSNER * 9840.0
                       &NrtjF:CEi"lEMT P:I = 5  OBLIGATED:  PF-.P






                     ANNUAL TARGET:






                        •   .                                FY 86 QUARTER




SITE/STATE                                 N=L

-------
                                                                      QSKER * 9840.0
                                                         rV  36

                                          MP1-  TYPE   :    1
                                    FOP:  Pt Cvarir. FARl'V fitijPUNSE: ft I /F3



                     ANNUAL TARGET:



                                                         FY 96  QUARTER
   »

SITE/STATE                                NPL  TYPE   !    1     I'    2

-------
                                                                     OSWER *
                                                        -••  3e DU

                                                'PE       1.
                      NKGQTIAT KDNS  F'OK PRiWHTE PwRT^ RESPONSE: C/R
   0

                     ANNUAL TARGET:


                                                        rV £6  QUARTE?

SITE/STATE                               NPL  TYPE  !    1     !     I

-------
                                                 Nr'L
                         ^DI-U-JI aT^^T I1. E ENKQRCEMEN V AC" IONS-rvE!1EDI^_







                        ANWUAL  TARGET:







                                                                 PY S6 CUAK'TE'R




SITE/STATE                                     NF'L  TYPE   !     1      !      -

-------
                                                                     OSWER # 9840.0
                      AUMIh4I=TP:AnvE ENFORCEMENT ACT IONS-3300itj  uP.DEn3







                     ANNUAL TARGET:






                          	                            FV 86 QUARTER
S I "Ei' 3 TATE                                NP!_  TVF E

-------
                                                   OSWER £ 9840.0




           £Nr-jP.Ce--IE*'" '"-C" I j IS : r.D.- -.-".
                                     F« 56




                      NPL  rvrE   ;    i
 JUDICIAL ENFORCEMENT  nCTIONS:TRQ,PI.PENALTIE5







ANNUAL  TARGET:







                                     FY 36  QUARTER




                            TYPE   :     1     !      2

-------
                                              -.  -  o
                                                                         OSWER # 9840.0
                                                          s-V 36 C-'JAF.TE*

                                            ?L  .TYPE'   :  '  1     !      -
                       •_:JS r ftECCVE?.'- CHEClKLISTi: REMEDIAL


                     ANNUAL TARGET:


                                                           FY 86 QUARTEr:

SITE/STATE               .                  NPL   TYPE   11     !     2

-------
                                                                  OSWER # 9840.0

                    Cu5T RECOVERY  ACTIONS REFERRED TO MO-REMEDIAL







                   ANNUAL  TARGET:






                                                     FY 96 QUARTER




SITE/STATE      .                        NPL  TYPE   !   1     !     2

-------
                                                   OSWER # 9840.0

                                        =r:  7-LIH- ' Sir
                      MP'._
                       TiArtoNs. r:E?;.-: ni-vi
ANNUAL TARGET:
SITE /STATE
                                      -Y S6  C/UAr.Tt




                       NPL   TYPE   I    1     :

-------
                                    OSWER # 9840.0
          APPENDIX B




REMEDIAL  SITE  ACTIVITY LIST

-------
REMEDIAL SITE ACTIVITY
DEC  19 1984
SITE NAMF,
BEACON HEIGHTS, CT
KRLljnGG-nRRRING, CT

IAIJRRL PARK, CT
YAWDRSKI, CT
BAIRD (, McGUIRR, MA
CANNON RNGR/BRHGWrR, MA

CANNON ENGR/PLYMTH, MA

CHARLES QFXTRGE(TYNG) , MA

GROVELANO WRLIS, MA

HocoMONCo POND, MA
INPURTRI-PLRX 12R, MA(Wbhurn)
IRON HORSE PARK, MA
NRW BEOFHRn, MA
NYANZA CHEMICAL, MA

RE-SOI.VR, MA
JSILRESIM, MA

F. O'CONNOR SITR, MR
•
MCKIN COMPANY, ME

PINETTE'S SALVAGE, ME

SACO TANNING, ME

iwiNTMROP IANDPILL, ME
A1IBIIRN ROAD, NH
COAKIF.Y, NH
*
WVKR I.ANPFILL, Nl!
KREFR RNV. , NH
••
^tr^
FYRI




\ •










RI/FS















RI/FS







PYR2
' I








,











Rl/FS















RI/FS
nn
i • .-,
FYRI
0 ACTIVITY
4




4
4

4

4

4

4


4
2

4
4
1


4
4












RI/FS




RT/FS
RI/I--S

RI/FS

Rl/FS

RI/FS

RI/FS


Rl/FS
RI/FS

RH
RT/FS
IRM
.

Rl/FS
IRM











FYR4
0 ACTIVITY

1


2





2
4


•

4



1








2


2


2
1

1

RI/FS


RI/FS





RO
RA




RT/FS



RA








RI/FS


E RT/I=S
•

Rf/FS
R
RA
RO
RA


Ul>
RA
1?A

































0
ra
»
=4fc
U3
00
^
O
•
o




-------
REMEDIAL SITE ATT1WITY LIST
REGN SITE NAME
01 OTTATI AND GOSS, NH
SAVAGE, NH
soMERSwnRTH LF, NH
SOtfTH MUNICIPAL, NH
SYLVESTER'S, NH (Nashua)

TINKHAM SITE, NH
DAVIS LIOUID, RI

PIC I U.O FARM, RI

STAMINA MILLS, RI
WESTERN SAND, RI

OLD SPRINGFIELD, VT
4
02 ASBESTOS DUMP, Nil
BEACHWnOD/BERKI.EY, Ml
BLUE SPRUCE, Ml
BOG CREEK, MI
BRADY METALS, Ml
BR I DGEPORT RENTAL, Ml

BURW^FLY BOG, NJ

CALDWELL TRUCKING, NJ
CHEMICAL COWmOL, Ml


(CHEMICAL INSECriCIDK, Ml
CHEMICAL LEAMAN, Ml
COMBE FILL NORTH, NJ
COMBE FILL sotrni, MI
DELILAH ROAD, Ml
DFN7.ER and SCHAFER, NJ
D'TMpERin PROPERTY, HI

EYRl


\

RI/FS
RA















RI/FS

RI/FS







.





FYR?







RI/FS

RA


RI/FS
IRM





















RT/rs
fUM
FYR1
0 ACriVTTY
3





4









4


4


2



4
4
4








RT/I^





IRM








•
P. RI/FS


RI/FS


TRM



R1/I;S
RD
« ArilVMTY


3








2













1







2
;>




RA








RD













RA

•





Ri\
K'l>






























O

i
=tfc
vo
00
4^
0
O



-------
PRMKDTAI. SI-PR ACTIVITY  LIST
RRGN SITE NAMR
02 RLLIS PROPRRTY, Ml
RWAN PROPRRTY, Ml

FLORENCE LANDFILL, Ml
^FRIEDMAN PROPRRTY, MI
GRMS LANDFILL, Ml

GURN RIDGE RADIATION, Ml

GOOSE FARM, MJ
HRIJ-1N KRAMER LNDFL, Ml
HRRCULRS, Ml
IMPRRIAL OIL, Ml
KIN-FMIC LANDFILL, Ml

KING OF PRIKSIA, Ml
KRYSOWATY FARM, Ml

LANG PROPRRTY, Ml
LIPARI LANDFILL, Ml

UDNE PINR LANDFILL, Ml
MRTALTRC/ARROSYRTRMS, Ml
MONTCLAIR RADIATION, Ml

MONTftTMFRY TOWNSHIP, Ml
NASCOLITE, MI

NL IND1KTRIRS, Ml
PRPR FIRLD, Ml
1PLIAK FARM, MI
PRICK LANDFILL, Ml

RRICH FARMS, Ml
RRNORA, Ml

^H^lNOnOD MTNRS, Ml
^^nW'KAWAY lUTWHIQI, N.I
FYRl



\









RT/FS





RF/FS







,










FYR2




RI/FS




RI/FS



RD
RA




RD
IRM
RT/FS








RT/KS
IUM
RT/FS




FYR3
O ACTIVITY





3




4





2


4











4




^^.





RI/FS




RI/FS
*




RT/FS


RA




.






•RD




J^RI/FS
V^
FYR4
O ACTIVITY
4


2








4



4

4


4
4


4
9.


4

1

4



"'
RT/FS


RT/FS








RI/FS



RD

F. RI/FS


RD
RT/FS


RI/FS
RI/FS


RI/FS

RA

RI/FS



RT/I'S
FYflS
0 ACTIVITY

2



3
2
1
4
3
4
3



2
3
1



4

1
4



2





1




R.I/FS



RD
IRM
RI/I-S
RD/»?A
RD
RD
R RT/FS



R RT/FS
RA
TUM



RA

RI/FS
RD/RA



R RT/FS





RI/FS

FYR6
0 ACTIVITY
4


3

2



2
3

4









3


4
. 1
4

4



4


J
, '
RD


RD

RA



RA
RA

RD









RD


RD
RD
RA

RD



RD



nn
FYHV
O ACTIVITY
1
1
4
s








\









2


i



3



3
1
4

t
PA
HI)
I«A
\<\








UA









RA
•

RA



RA



RA
RD
RA


                                                                            vo
                                                                            CD

-------
                                                                     I'ACK  4
REMEDIAL SITE ACTIVITY LIST
RECN SITE NAME
02 ROCKY HILL MUNICIPAL, 1*1
ROERLING STEEL, 1*1
SAYREVILLE L/F, N.1

SCP, N.1
RHARKEY LANDFILL, N.1

ISPENCB FARM, 1*1

SWOPE OIL, NJ
SYNCON RESINS, N.1

TABERNACLE DRIM, N.1

TOM'S DRIVER OIEMICAL, N.1
U.S. RADIUM, Ml
VENTRON/VELStOOL, Ml
WAIDTCK AEROSPACE, N.1
tillJjtAMS PROPERTY, N.1
BATAVIA LANDFILL, NY
BREWKTER WELLFIELD, NY

CLOTHIER, NY

FULTON TERMINALS, NY

G.B. MOREAI1, NY
n.M./CENTRAL FOUNDRY, NY
HAVILAND, NY

HOOKER/102ND STREET, NY
HOOKER/HYDE PARK, NY
HOOKER/S AREA, NY
HUlttON RIVER PCB, NY


,,~.~^,*,, ,.„,, , Mv
FYfll


\


































FYR2







RT/FS
IHM




























FYR3
O ACTIVITY









4
1
1














4



3
3
3








•




RI/FS
RI/FS
IRM














E RI/FS



E RI/FS
E RT/FS
E RI/FS




FYR4
O ACTIVITY
4
3



1








2
4
4

4
2
2






2





2
4
4

RI/FS
RI/FS



RI/FS








E RI/FS
E RI/FS
RT/FS

RI/FS
P RI/FS
RT/FS






E RI/FS





RI/FS
RD
UA

FYRS
O ACTIVITY


1

2




3
4

1




3




1

1



2







^


RT/I--S

E RI/FS




RI1
Rl>

RT/1--S




Rl/HS




RlA^S

R J /'FS



v r/FS







• » » ' i .x ;
FYRfi
0 ACriVITY
4
3



1
4


2
3





4

4

1
4















RD
Rh



RH
RA


RA
RA





RD

RD

RD
RA















FYM7
(> ACTIVITY
\
2
1
4








1
4


3
2
3



1
4
1
4


1
4






.'
1*
KA
m>
KA








Kit
UA


KA
Kl)
KA



Kl»
I'A
RH
KA


RM
KA






KM




























fQ
S
w
=*=
vo
oo
O
0




-------
RFMF.11IAL SITF ACTIVITY LIST
SITE NAME
KENPICKY AVENUE, NY
I/WE CANAL, NY

MARATHON BATTERY, NY
OLEAN WELLFIELP, NY

PAS/OSWBfJO, NY

ROBINTECH, NY
SARNF.Y PROPERTY, NY
SINCLAIR REFINERY, NY
SMS INI1KTRIES, NY
SUFFERN WELL FIELP, NY

VESTAL, NY
VOLNEY L/F, NY

WIPE HFACH, NY
YORK OIL, NY

FIBERS PUBLIC SUPPLY, PU
.1UNCOS LANDFILL, PR
VRRA ALT A, PR
TOP 11
TBP 12
PELAWARE SAND, PF.

HARVEY-KN01T, PP.

TYBOUTS CORNER, HE


ml^MJCKf IF
•^•j - 1
JEPlESTONE ROAP, MH
FYR1

RI/i


RI/FS

RH
RI/FS


























FYR2


RA



RA



























FYR3
0 ACTTVT.TY
4


4



.


4







4


4
4


4

4
3
2


RI/FS


RT/FS






1» 1 /FS



•



UT/FS


F. RI/FS
F. RT/FS


RI/FS

R I/PS
IUM
i»T/FS


LA-

FYR4
O ACTIVITY














2


2














4















RT/FS


RI/FS














RT/FS

FYRS
0 ACTIVITY
4


3
3
2


2
4
2
3
2

4
1

3


2


3
3


4

2
4
5


RD


Rl)
Rl)
TNM


E RT/FS
E RT/FS
RH
RI/I-S
RT/l'S

RP
RT/I^

RO


E RI/FS


R l?!/!^
F, RI/FS


l?l)

)">
PA
I'.'M


FYR6
0 ACTIVITY
3


2
2





1



3


2
1
4





1
4
3




4
\
RA
.

RA
RA





RA



RA


RA
RP
RA





RD
RA
RA




RP
im
I-'YH/
0 ACTIVITY











V
1
4

1
4















i












Rl)
Ul)
UA

Ul) .
RA















RA



























O
w
S
=»*=
vo
00
0
9
O



-------
                                      RRMKDrAf.. SITF ACTIVITY LIST
RRfU SITE NAMR
03 MimLRTowN ROAD, MD

SAND, GRAVEL & STONE, MO
BERKS SAND PIT, PA

RLOBRNSKI, PA
BROnHEAD CRERK, PA

BRUIN LAOOON, PA

nORNEY ROAD, PA

PTOIIGIASVILLB, PA
DRAKE CHEMICAL, PA
FAST MT4 7. ION, PA

RVTKRPRISE AVF.., PA
HAVERTOWN PCP, PA
HEUWA LANDFILL, PA
HENIHRSON ROAD, PA 1

INDUSTRIAL LANE, PA
LACKAWANNA, PA
•
LF.HIGH ELRCTRIC, PA
2MCJ\DOO ASSOCIATES, PA
MILL CREF.K, PA
MOYRRS LANDFK.L, PA
PAIHRRTON ZINC, PA
TAYLOR nOROUHH,PA
TYSONS DISPOSAL, PA

VODRWAN FARM, PA

KY8I

N






RI/FS
RD














Rl/FS









FYR2









RA














RA
RT/PS








FYB3
O ACTIVITY
4

. -1


4







2




4



4

2


4


4



RI/FS

RT/KS


R RF/FS







RI/FS




RI/FS



Rl/FS

RD


RT/FS


RI/FS



PYR4
o ArnviTv



2


4



2

I
4
2

1
1

2

2



4
1

2
1


2




RI/FS


RI/FS



RI/FS

RT/FS
RD
RI/FS

RA
Rl/PS

RI/FS

R RI/FS



IRM
RT/FS

F. RI/FS
RT/FS


RT/FS

FYRS
O ACTIVITY


4









4
2




3



2
4


4
4

3
1
3




RD









RD
RA




RD



RD
n\


im
im

PD
lit)
U'X


FYRfi
0 ACTIVITY
1
4
3
1
4

1
4


1
4
3

1
4

2
2
1
4





3
3

2


1
4
RD
RA
RA
RD
RA

RD
RA


RD
RA
RA

RD
RA

RD
RA
RD
RA





RA
RA

RA


RD
R/V
I-'YH/
0 ACTIVITY

















1

































RA





















.





















O
g
13
^t=
vo
00
*>
o
•
o

2 - Enforcement Takeover

-------
REMEDIAL-S fTE ACTIVITY LIST
RBON SITE NAME
03 WALSH ROAD, PA

WESTLINE, PA
CHISMAN CREEK, VA

MATTHEWS ELECTROPLAT, VA
SALTVILLE WASTE IMS P. , VA

LEETOWN PESTICIDE, WV
MCCLINTIC, WV

TRD 1 I

TRD 1 2

TRD 1 3
T
TRD 4
TRD 5
TBD 6
TRD 7
TRD R
TRD 9
DIOXIN 11
DIOXW 1 2
DIOXIN 1 3
04 MORRAY ENGINEERING, AL

PER I DIDO OROUNDWATER, At.

STAUFFER/COLD CREEK, At.
STAIIFFER/LEMOYNE, AL
TRIANA, AL
62ND STREET DUMP, PL
FYR1



\

RI/FS





'






















FYR2
































RT/HS

0 /


4
4

4



4








'














4}
FYR3
ACTIVITY

.
RI/FS
RI/FS

RD



RT/FS























iT
0 f
2




I
2

2




•



















3
FYR4
ACTIVITY
RT/FS




RA
RI/FS

RT/FS
























RI/FS
nr/r;
0 I


4








2

2

2

3
3
2
2
3
4
2
3
3
7

I

1
1


FYRS
XCTIV! ". «•


RD








RT/KS

RI/FS

RI/P;

RI/Ri
Rt/IN
E RI/KS
E RI/I--S
E RT/FS
E RI/FfJ
E RI/FS
E ntA-s
E RJ/l-'S
Rl/IN

RT/FS

E RI/FS
E R!/F"S


O ^
1
4
3
1
4

1
4
2
1
4






















3
S
FYR6
ACTIVITY
RD
RA
RA
RD
RA

RD
RA
RD
RD
RA






















RD
UD
RA
' KO
0 /








1


1
4
1
4
1
4
2
2




•

I
1
4
1
4



2
\
XCTIVITY
•







UA


KM
RA
Ul>
\>
I)
U/\
RM
UM







RD
RA
RD
KA



U.A
1^^




























O
|
Jo
=**=
00
O
O

-------
REMEDIAL SITE ACTIVITY LIST
SITE NAME
COLFMAN EVANS, FL
HIPII>S ROAD L/F, FL
KASSAllF-KIMERLINCi, FL
MIAMI DRJJM SERVICES, FL

NW 5RTH STREET, FL

PEPPER STEEL, FL
PICKETIVILLE ROAD, FL
PIONEER SAND, FL

SAPP BATTERY, FL
TOWER CHEMICAL, FL
VARSOL SPILL, FL
4
WHltTEHOUSB WASTE OIL, FL
ZELLWnOD GROUNDWATER, FL
LUMINOUS PROCESSES, CA
POWERS VI LIJR, CA

2A.L.TAYLOR SITE, KY
AI'RCO, KY
B.F.OnonRTCH, KY
DISTLRK BRICKYARD, KY
•
DISTLER FARM, KY
LEE'S LANE LANDFILL, KY '
NEWPORT DUMP, KY
FLownon SITE, MS
CHEMTRONICS, NC
'
PCB ROADSIDE SPILLS, NC
BO IFF ROAD/SCRDI, SC

CAROIAWN, SC

FYRI



RI/FS
















RI/FS















FYR2



IRM







RI/FS



IRM

RA













RA
IU/FS
TRM


FYR3
0 ACTIVITY





2







2

4

.





4

4
4







4






RI/FS

i





HI AS

RI/FS




t


HI /PS

RT/FS
E RT/FS







E RT/FS

FYR4
0 ACTIVITY
4
4
1




2
4
2


2



2




4
4




4







7
RT/FS
RI/FS
RT/FS




E RI/PS
E RT/FS
RT/FS


E RI/PS



E RI/FS




E RI/PS
E RI/FS




E IU /PS







PI/I-'S
FYRS
O ACTIVITY
4




2
4




1



1


2









2
1


1



TRM




RD
RA




Rlt



RD


n I A~s









RT/FS
RI/KS


\>n



FYRfi
0 ACTIVITY
4
4
1
I
4




I
4
2

1
4
2







1
4
2






2


I
RD
RD
RD
RD
RA




RD
RA
RA

RD
RA
RA







RD
'RA
RD






RA


RD
FYHV
) ACTIVITY
^
\
2















1
4





1


1
4
1
4





RA
UA
KA















im
RA





RA


Rl)
RH
RA


































|
9
=»te
VO
00
O
O



-------
REMEDIAL SITE ACTIVITY LIST
                                                                  PACE
REGN SITE NAME
04 GEIGRR, SC
TNI*; PENDENT NAIL, SC
PALMETIT) WTlOD, SC
WAMCHEM, SC

GALLOWAY PITS, TO
MURRAY-OHIO DUMP, TO
NORTH HOLLYWOOD, TO
VELSICOL/HARDKMAN, TN
OS A & F MATERIALS, IL
ACME SOLVENT, IL

BRLVIDERE L/F, IL
BYRON SALVAGE YARD, IL
4
CROS9 BROS/PEMBROKE, IL
JOHNS-MANVILLE, IL
KERR McGEE, IL
LASALLF. ELECTRIC, IL
NATIONAL LEAD, IL
OUTBOARD MARINE CORP, IL
PAGEL'S PIT, IL
PETERSON SAND, IL
RIVERDALE, IL
SHEFFIELD, IL
VELSICOL/MARSHAU,, IL
WAUCONPA SAND, IL

AMERICAN CHEM SERVE, IN
2ENVIRO-CHEM, IN
FISHER CAIO, IN
FF. WAYNE REDUCTION, IN


LAKE SANDY ,TO, IN
^^AN STREET WRLI. F[F,m, IN
^^^
FYRl
























•












FYR2







RI/FS





























FYfl3
0 ACriVITY









3
3


3

3
4



2





4


3









*






RI/FS
RI/PS


RI/FS

D r Sf?c
•» 1 / " r^
E RI/FS



RI/FS





RI/FS


RI/FS







FYR4
0 ACTIVITY
4




2
2





4




I
2

4
4
4

4





4



2


RI/FS




RI/PS
R RI/FS





RI/FS




R RI/FS
RI/FS

RD
RI/FS
RI/FS

RT/FS


.


R RT/FS



R I/FS


FYflS
0 ACTIVITY

3
2
2



4
1




1
3
2


2
2
4


1

1


1


2



7.
7

RT/FS
R RI/FS
RI/FS



RD
R RI/FS




RD
PA
RD


Rn
E RI/FS
RA


E RT/FS

F. RI/FS


R RI/FS


RI/l-S



R 1 /'• ':>
m>
FYR6
4




2

3


1
4
4


1


1


4
4

4

1
4






7.
1

Rn




Rn

RA


Rn
RA
RD


RA


RA


RD
RD

RD

RD
RA






R!)
IM

I'YHV
0 ACTIVITY
1
•).

\
4
1






3








3
3

3






I
/I

1


KA
XI)

un
K/\
RA






RA
1







RA
\\\

RA






Rn
RA

R«\





























o
§
Q
=«=
vo
CO
o

o




-------
RKMRDIAL STTR ACTIVITY LIST
RITR NAME
MARION BRAGG, IN

MinCO I, IN
MII1CO II, IN
NORTHS IDB SANITARY LF, IN
PORR FARM, IN
RRILLY TAR, IN
SRYMCUR RECYCLING, IN
WYNR WASTE, IN

WRTOEB, IN
BRRI.IN & FARRO, MI


BURROWS SANITATI(TN, MI
BirrrKRWHRTH 1./F, MI
CFMBIEKY WMP, MI
CHARLRV/niX MUNICIPAL, MI

CLARK MUNICIPAL, MI

CLIFF/DOW PIMP, MI
FOREST WASTF. PROIllCrS, Ml

G S. II INDUSTRIAL, MI

cRATimr cawTY LDFL, MI
IONIA L/F, MI
K & L L/F, MI
LIQUID DISPORAL, MI

MFrFAMflRA L/F, MI
NnRrUFRNAIRK, MI
NOVACO TBMW.RANCR, MI
arr/STORY/CORITA/A, MI
PACKAGING COUP, Ml
RASMUSSKN'S M IMP, MT
FYRl




\


RI/FS


















RD










FYR2







IRM



RT/PS
IRM
RA























o ;


4
4













4






4




3
-

4
4
4

K,
FYRl
ACTIVITY


R Rf/FS
R RI/FS
.












RI/I-'S






RI/P'S




RI/PS


RI/FS
F. Rl/FS
R Rf/FS

t"* * /!.'<_'
O f




2
2
2








4
3

3


2
1
3



4
4






2
3
FYR4 •
ACTIVITY




R RI/FS
RI/FS
R RI/FS








R Rt/PS
RI/FS

TTIM


R RI/FS
RI/FS
IRM



R RI/FS
R RT/FS






R RT/FS
RI/FS
O »
2






4
1

1



3

2
4
3
2
2




3
4





3
3



2
PYRS
OIVITY
RI/K;






RH
HI/FT,

R RT/I/S



RT/I'^

RO
RA
RA
RD
R TA':j


l

RD
RA '
(




Rt/l'S
RP



1W"
O *







3














1
4





1
4.

2



4
FYRfi
ACTIVITY







RA














RH
RA





RD
RA

RA



RH
im
C) /i
1
4



4


1
4




?




1
•1










2




I
i
FYM7
WTIVITY
un
R<\



Kh


Rl>
\<\




un




xn
i
-------
                                                              IW a-: 11
REMEDIAL SITF. ACHVITY LIST
REGN SITE NAME
05 SPIEGELBIJRG L/F, MI
SPRINGFIELD DUMP, MI
TAR LAKE, MI

VERONA WELL FIELD, MI
ARROWHEAD REFINERY, MN
KOCH REFINING/N-REN, MN
KOPPER GAS & COKE, MN

KlIMMER, MN
LEHILLIER/MANKATO, MN
LONG PRAIRIE, MN
MORRIS ARSENIC, MN

3MACGILLIS AND GIBBS, MN
NAT'L JLFAD/rARACORP, MN
NEW BRIGHTON, MN

PINE BEND SLF/CROSBY, MN

REILLY TAR, MN

SOirrH ANIYWER, MN
ST. LOOIS RIVER, MN
WASTE DISPOSAL ENGR, MN
WHITCAKER, MN
ALLIED CHEMICAL, OH

ARCANIM IRON & METAL, OH

BOWERS LANDFILL, OH
BUCKEYE RECLAMATION, OH


CHKM-DYNE CORP, OH
^^^
^^rnsHorroN, OH

FYRl




\














RI/FS

















FYB2

































RI/FS
IWJ

O ACTIVITY




f










4
4


\



4











4




RI/FS










1U/FS
IRM


' IRM



RI/FS










^^^

,, ... . i "^f
FYR4
0 ACTIVITY
3
3


3
2



4
1
4
2


4





4


4
1

2

1







RI/FS
RI/FS


F.
RD
RD


RA
RA



RD
RD
RD
RD
RA
RA
RD



RD
RA
RD

RA

RD
RA
RD
RA
RD






« UD
FYH7
0 ACTIVITY
,
').
\
4


1
1
4
i
}.
\



,

8
•1


1
i






I
I
4




1
RA
RA
Iv'll
\"\


WD
IMi
RA
RA
RA
M



RA

un
ItA


RA
|JD






RA
KD
It K



^^
'J^r



























O
1
W
^
vo
00
ȣ*
O
0




-------
REMEDIAL SITE ACTIVITY LIST
SITE NAME
FIII.TZ L/F, OH
INI11KTRIAL EXCESS, OH

LASKTN/POPLAR, OH
MIAMI COUNTY DIMP, OH
NEW LYME LANDFILL, OH

OLD MILL, OH

PRISTINE L/F, OH
SKINNER L/F, OH
S. POINT PLANT, OH

SI MM IT NATIONAL, OH
UNITED SCRAP LEAD, OH

EAIH CLARE, WI
. 4
MASTER DISPOSAL, WI
MIIVSTATE DISPOSAL, WI
SMALTZ IllMP, WI .

TOD I
TOD 2
TOD 3
TOD 4^
TOD 5
CECIL LINDSAY, AR
QIRLEY PITS, AR
INDUSTRIAL WASTE, AR
MIDLAND PRODUCTS, AR

MiD-soirrH, AR
VERTAC, AR
FYfll




\





























FYR2


































FYRl
0 ACPIVITY



4

4

4



















4

4


4
4



RI/FS

RI/FS

RT/FS



















RI/FS

E RT/FS


F. Ul/FS
F Rf/FS
PYR4
0 ACTIVITY
4


4
2




4
4


2





1








2





RT/FS


RD
E RI/FS




RI/FS
E RI/FS


RI/FS





RI/FS








E RI/FS





FYRS
O ACTIVITY

I

1



3
4


I


1
4
1
4
3
1
1

3
3
3
3
3



2




RI/FS

IRM



RD
RA


RI/FS


RI/FS
IRM
RI/FS
TRM
RI/FS
TRM
RI/FS

E RT/FS
E RI/FS
E RT/FS
E RI/FS
E RI/FS



RT/FS



FYR6
0 ACTIVITY
4


I

I
4


4



2





2







2






RD


RA

RD
RA


RD



RD





RD







RD






FYH7
0 ACTIVITY
3
1
4






3

1
4
1
1
4
1
4
:>
\
i
4





1


1
/I


RA
RH
RA






RA

RD
RA
RA
'RD
RA
RD
RA
RD
RA
im
RA





RA


im
RA































8
@
W
=»-.
00
o
• o

-------
                                                                        ,f.  I I
REMEDIAL SITE ACTIVITY LIST
RITE NAME
BAYOU BONFOUCA, LA
BAYOU SORRELL, LA

CLEVE-RERER , LA
OLD INGER OIL, IA

PETRO PROCESSORS, IA
4TATE COVE, LA
PREwrrr REFINERY, NM

SOUTH VALLEX, NM
UNITED NUCLEAR, NM
COMPASS INDUSTRIES, OK

HARDAGE/CRINER, OK

SAND SPRJNGS, OK
TAR CREEK/niTAWA, OK

BIO-ECOLOGY, TX
BRIO OIL REFINERY, TX
CAVALCADE NORTH, TX

CAVALCADE SOUTH, TX
CRYSTAL CHEMICAL, TX

FRENCH LIMITED, TX

GENEVA INDUSTRIES, TX

HARRIS SITE, TX

HIGHLANDS ACID PIT, TX

KOPPBRS-TBXARKANA
MOTCO, TX
IMjKSA CHROMIUM »1 , TX
0VSA CHROMIUM »2, TX
r«-»piv\ r-ni.^M ir'rir TV
FYR1




\






























RT/FS



FYR2




RT/FS


RI/FS









RI/FS

RI/FS






RT/FS





RT/FS





FYR3
O ACTIVITY
4
4

4


4



4
4


4




4




1





1




3



RI/FS
RI/FS

RT/FS


E RI/FS



RT/FS
E RI/FS


RT/FS




T'JM




RT/FS





RIAS




HUM.


KYR4
O ACTIVITY




4
4






3

' -

3
3
3
4
4







1



3
4


4
4




TRM
RD






RI/FS



RT/FS
RD
RA
RD
RT/FS







RT/FS



RD
RA


HI AS
RI/FS
* ; RI/FS
FYRS
O ACTIVITY
4


4
4



2

2








4

I

5
I
4








1
2



RD


RD
RA



RI/FS

TRM








RA

Rf/FTi

E RI/FS
RD
RA








E Rl/FS
RD


FYR6
O ACTIVITY
3
I
4
3








1
4
1
4




4





1
4
1'
4
I
4



1
4
4
RA
RD
RA
RA








RD
RA
RD
RA




RD





RD
RA
RD
RA
RD
RA



RA
HD
RD
!- ' : IS)
FYM7
0 ACTIVITY








1
4






2



1
1
4













1
1
1








HD
HA






HD



HA
HD
RA













U'V
HA
in
                                                                            vo
                                                                            00

-------
                                                             I'ACK
REMEDIAL SITE AenviTY LIST
REHN SITE NAME
Ob TRIANGLE CHEMICAL, TX

IINITBO CREOKOTINC,, TX
07 AIDEX CORPORATION, IA

DES MOINRS TCE(DICO), IA
LAnotiNTY LANDFILL, IA
ARKANSAS CITY DUMP, KS
CHEROKEE COUNTY, KS
ARENA 2: MINKER/STTW


ELLISVILLE SITES, MO

FiNnerr/ST. CHARLRS, MO
FULHRIC^rT, MO
TIMKS BRACK, MO

•mn 11
TRD 12
TBD 13
TBD 14
TRD 15
TflD 16
TWO 17,
TBD 18
08 IWODERICK WmD, CO
CALIFORNIA «ILCH, CO
CENTRAL CITY, CO

PFNVER RADIUM, CO
IPWRY LANDFHJ., CO
ROCKY MTN. ARSFNAf,, CO


RWD CRKF.K, CO
FYRI



\



IU/FS






















RI/PS





FY82



RI/Ffi
TRM







RI/FS
IRM






















FYRI
O ACTIVITY
4








2
1
2




4
2









4
4


4



4
Rl/KS








RtAS
RA
1UM



•>
RI/FS
RA









E RI/FS
Rl/FS


R RT/FS



RT/FS
FY84
O ACTIVITY


2
4

7
2

4
1




4
4
2









2











R[/FS
RD

E RI/FS
E RI/FS

RT/FS
RD




E RI/FS
R RI/FS
RD









E Rt/FS









FYRS
O ACTWlTv
3
4

4








4
I




4
3
3
4
2
2
3
3




2

1



Rl>
R»\

RA








RA
RD




RI/FS
RI/PS
RI/FS
RI/FS
E RI/FS
E RT/FS
E R l/FS
E RI/PV,




RH

RT/::;



FY86
0 ACTIVITY


2





3



















1
4
I




4


RD





RD



















RD
RA
RA




RD
FYH7
o ArnviTY


1





2









3
>
2
3










1
4

1


RA





KA









RD
R1>
Rh
U|)










Kl)
RA

KA




























O
S
S
*=
, •*
bo
0^
o

o


-------
                                                                                                           I'M a-: is
                                           REMEDIAL STTP. ACrfVITY LIST
09
SITE NAME
SMDGT.LER MTN., CO
WOODWIRY CHEMICAL, co

ANACONDA SMELTER, MT
ANACONDA/GREAT FALLS, MT
EAST HELENA SMELTER, MT
MILLTOWN, MT

SILVER ROWr MT

ARSENIC TRIOXIDE, ND

MONTICBLLO, irr

OLSEN/MIEHART, ITf

SHARON STEEL, IIT
4
TAPtJTIMU FARM, AS
ORITOT LANDFILL, HI
PCB WAREHOUSE, CM
PCR WASTES, TT
INDIAN REND, AZ
LITCHFIELD AIRPORT, AZ
MOUNTAIN VIEW/GLOBE, AS
+B
TIICSON AIRPORT, AZ
ATLAS, CA
GOALINCA, CA
CELTOR CHEMICAL, CA

PEL NORTE, CA
IRON MOUNTAIN MINE, CA

JIHNOOM JUNKYARD, CA *

FYRS




\































FYR2










RT/FS







RD

















FYR1
0 ACTIVITY

4

4
4
4
4

4
4





.


1
1
1
1

4
2
3
1


4
4

4




'RT/FS

E RT/FS
E RT/FS
E RI/FS
RT/FS

RT/FS
IUM








RT/FS
RT/FS
RIAS
RT/FS

E RI/FS
E RI/FS
RD/RA
1U/FS


RT/FS
TUM

RT/FS



FYR4
O ACTIVITY






1
1










2



2




4
4


3


\







RD
RA










RA
•


E RI/PS




RT/FS
RI/FS


RT/FS


IU/KS

FYRS
0 ACTIVITY
8
2
4)









2

2

2












4
4
4


1
.1
E RT/FS
RD
RA









RI/FS

RI/FS

RT/FS












RA
RD
RD


RD
I'A
FYR6
O ACTIVITY










1
4














2
4
4


3
1
4












RD
RA














RD
RD
RD


RA
RD
RA


PYM7
0 ACTIVITY








1
4


1
4
1
4
1
4








I
1
1















im
UA


un
I*A
HI)
1^
KM
K/V








UA
UA
RA




































§
@
?o
^»^
VD
CO
lt>
O
«
O


-------
REMEDIAL SITK ACTIVITY LIST
                                                                    i>Aa-:  if,
REGN RITR NAME
09 MCCOLL SITE, CA

OPERATING INDUSTRIES, CA
PURITY OIL, CA

SAN FERNANDO AREA 1 I
SAN FERNANDO AREA 1 2
SAN FERNANDO AREA 1 3
SAN FERNANDO AREA 1 4
SAN GABRIEL 1, CA

SAN GABRIEL 2, CA
SAN GABRIEL 3, CA
SAN GABRIEL 4, CA
SELMA PRESSURE, CA
SOUTH QAY SITE, CA

STRINGFELLOW ACID, CA


HAWAII WELLS, HI
10 BIWKER HILL, ID
IWITED CHROME, OR
COIflBRT LANDFILL, WA
cow BAY/KEARSHORE, WA

COMM BAY/S TACOMA, WA

FRONTIER HARD CHROME, WA
GREENACRES L/F, WA

MIDWAY L/F, WA
MORTHSIDE L/F, WA
PONDERS CORNER ( I AKEWTDD) , WA
FYfll




\












RD





RI/FS










FYR2
























RI/FS









FYR3
O ACTIVITY
4
















3
4
4




2

3 '







RT/FS
















RI/FS
RA
TRM




TRM

RT/FS







FY«4 '
0 ACTIVITY
3
3

2





3
3
3
3
3








2
4




2




2
RD
RA

RT/FS





RT/FS
TRM
RT/FS
RT/FS
RT/FS








RI/PS
TRM




RT/FS




R T/FS
FYRS
0 ACTIVITY


3
4
2
4
4
4
4





2
2




3
1
3



1
4

2

2
2



E RT/FS
RD
TRM
RI/FS;
RI/FS
RT/FS
RI/FS





E RT/FS
RT/FS




RI/FS
E RI/FS
RD



RD
RA

RT/FS

RT/FS
RI/FS

FYB6
O ACTIVITY



3





3

3
3
3








2
2
I
4


2




2



RA





RD

RD
RD
RD








RA
RD
RD
RA


RD




RD
FYH7
0 ACTIVITY





3
3
3
}
2

2
2
2

1
4



2


1




1
1
4
1
4
I
4
1





im
RD
KM
RD
RA

RA
RA
RA

RD
RA



RD


RA




RA
RD
RA
RA
RD
RA
RA




























Q
§
9
=«=
co
o
o


-------
                                                                                                               W.K  I?
                                           RFMKniAl. SITF ACTIVITY LIST
in
SITF NAME
TAR PITS, WA
TOFTnAHL DRUMS, WA

WBSTERN PROCRSSTNG, WA
TRH 13
PY81



\

FYR2





FY83
O ACTIVITY
4


4
R RI/PS


Rl/h-S
i
PYR4
0 ACTIVITY










PYRS
0 ACTIVITY

I

2
3

Rl/Pf;

RD
F. Rt/PS
FYR6
0 ACriVITV



1




RA

FY»7
o AITIVITY

l
4



m>
Kfli


                                                                                                                       =«:
                                                                                                                       VO
                                                                                                                       00
                                                                                                                       O
                                                                                                                       o

-------