6 EPA
Unittd State*
Environmental Protection
Agency
Off ice of
Solid Waste end
Emergency Responae
DIRECTIVE NUMBER:
9840.0
TITLE:
FY 1986 SUPERFUND COMPREHENSIVE ACCOMPLISHMENTS
PLAN
APPROVAL DATE: DECEMBER 24, 1984
EFFECTIVE DATE: DECEMBER 24, 1984
ORIGINATING OFFICE: QWPE
(3FINAL
D DRAFT
STATUS:
REFERENCE (other documents):
OS WER OS \NER OS WER
VE DIRECTIVE DIRECTIVE Dl
-------
tf% f->r%A
O t PA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Washington. DC 20460
OSWER Directive Initiation Re<
Originator Information
Interim Directive Numb
9840.0
Title
F¥ 1986 Superfund Comprehensive Accomplishments Plan
Summary of Directive
This document sets forth procedures for planning enforcement
and fund-financed activity in FY 1986.
Topics addressed include priority activities, operating
procedures, targets for activities, interactions between
fund-financed and enforcement activities and enforcement
Key words: SCAP, planning, targets, enforcement
activities, case budget, priorities
Type of Directive (Manual. Policy Directive. Announcement, etc.)
Guidance
Status
D Draft
&J Final
LJ New
LJ Revision
Does this Directive Supersede Previous Directives)? | | Yes
If "Yes" to Either Question. What Directive (number, titlel
I | No Does It Supplement Previous Directive)*)' LJ Yes | I
Review Plan
D AA-OSWER
D OERR
D OSW
D OUST
D OWPE
LJ Regions
D OECM
D OGC
D OPPE
Other (Specify!
This Request Meets OSWER Directives System Format
Signature of Lead Office Dir
. a.
Signature of OSWER Directives Officer
Date
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
.VASHINGTON 3.C. 20J'0
OSWER # 9840.0
DEC 2 4 1984
MEMORANDUM
/•
SUBJECT: FY 1 936 .Supfrf und Comprehensive Accomplishments Plan
FROM : L^f^T^^/^-
Assistant Acministretor
/
TO: Regional Administrators, Regions I - X
Attached is the FY 1986 Superfund Comprehensive Accomplish-
ments Plan (SCAP), including preliminary targets for components
of the Strategic Planning and Management System (SPMS). The
SCAP complements the Agency's FY 1986 Operating Guidance and
Regional site management planning process by providing a struc-
ture through which Headquarters and the Regions can identify and
al locate FY 1986 resources for removal , remedial , enforcement,
community relations, laboratory support, and other Superfund
program components.
Regiona submissions of the preliminary FY 1986 SCAP are
due to Headquarters on January 30, 1985. After a brief review
period, Headquarters will get back to each Region and discuss
its proposed plan. Negotiations on the preliminary SCAP must be
completed by March 1, 1985. Revisions to the preliminary SCAP
will be considered during June, July, and August. The final
FY 1986 SCAP will be established in early September, 1985.
Timelines showing the Agency's and OSWER's FY 1986 planning
processes are attached.
FY 1986 marks the second year for which we have fully inte-
grated the planning of all aspects of the Superfund program*
The FY 1986 SCAP is similar in most respects to that developed
for FY 1985. At this point, participants should be familiar with
the reporting procedures and requirements. Any questions that
do occur should be addressed to the normal Headquarter's contact
for the program area involved. Also, we have scheduled some
-------
OSWER f 9840.0
*•' -ne 2" T *e Januarv Sjser-*jno Bran.cf. Criers' meeting to d'scuss
any concerns that a r i se . ! wish TO emp na s i 29 Tne following
poinrs made in tne SCAP:
• The scheaule for developing the FY 1986 SCAP has been cnangec
from that used for FY 1985 in order to integrate OSWER1s
planning process into the Agency's overall planning process,
particularly operating plan development and Regional FTE
distributions. The preliminary SCAP will be used as input
to the Regional workload model which is due to the Comptroller
on March 1, 1985. It is difficult to adjust this distribution
once it is made. Consequently, you should pay close attenticr
to your preliminary submission. "
o We worked with staff from the lead Superfund Regions on
revisions to the SPMS measures at a meeting on the Agency's
Operating Guidance in early December 1984. The SPMS
measures and definitions will be final i zed by June 30, 1985.
The SCAP targets proposed in thi s document are not based on
the definitions developed at that meeting. When definitions
are finalized, SPMS targets will be adjusted as necessary.
Separate SCAP targets are proposed for Fund-financed and
enforcement actions. These targets are negotiable .
• Site stabilization continues to be the program's highest
priority. You should consider both actual and potential
releases when evaluating potential removal actions, partic-
ularly at National Priorities List sites.
« We do not want to delay any project from moving directly
tnrough the Record of Decision to design or from design to
remedial action. We urge your personal attention to ensure
that projects meet the schedules agreed to by you and your
States as set forth in your Site Management Plans. In
addition, sound management oversight must be extended to
prevent unwarranted project cost growrh. To expedite these
decisions, as you know, we are currently developing a
proposal to delegate substantial ROD decision-making to
Regional Administrators by February 1, 1985.
• Administrative and judicial enforcement actions should be
taken whenever possible. This includes actions taken under
CERCLA S106 and §107, and RCRA §3008 and §3013. A major
area of emphasis will be initiation of §106 judicial actions
at enforcement-lead sites where focused feasibility studies
have been completed. ^
t
• Me are continuing to look for ways to improve planning for
total laboratory support needs, including the contract 1
oratory program. Your ESD Director should already have,
will soon be receiving, guidance on a revised estimating
nique for FY 1985 needs. You are asked to provide summary"
•or
*
-------
- 3 -
OSWER fc 9840.0
FY 1986 projections based on that guidance. You should al so
note that we will be refining and revising this format for
FY 1985 as problems arise. The final FY 1986 SCAP wiM use
the Improved format.
• The RCRA Dioxin Regulations have been signed and issued.
They will be effective in six months. A CERCLA/RCRA Work
Group has been establ i shed to deal with the devel opment of
an implementation plan for this regulation. A preliminary
draft of the plan has identified several CERCLA actions which
have re source implications, especially related to the other
isomers of d i ox i n is sue. The plan will be provided to the
Regions in January and it may have an effect on the FY 1986
SCAP. There w i i i be sere impact on the FY 1985 SCA? cs well.
« Now that the S-uperfund program is beginning to mature, in-
creased emphasis must be placed on our ongoing workload
and longer term planning. The FY 1986 SCAP includes
requirements for projecting completed remedial activities
in FY 1986. and for projecting new and ongoing remedial
projects (including certain enforcement activities) for
FY 1987. These projections will have significant impacts
on such areas as FY 1986 Regional resource allocations and
FY 1987 budget development.
o It is important that we place priority on deletion of. sites
from the NPL. The targets should ref I ect your ' a sse ssment of
the maximum number of sites for which the technical information
i s adequate for del i sting.
Finally, the revised t i me table for development of the FY
1986 SCAP dictates that we begin work on the SCAP prior,to
establishment of the President's budget. The targets contained
in the SCAP are based on the Agency's request to OMB. OMB
Circular No. A-10 states that budgetary material should not be
disclosed in any form prior to transmittal to Congress of the
President's request. Accordingly, at this point the attached
SCAP should not be released outside of the Agency. This does
not apply to Region-specific information needed for coordination
with the States or other Federal agencies.
Preparation of the SCAP is an important step in effectively
managing the Superfund program. I urge you to take the time to
familiarize yourself with the priorities and requirements in
the SCAP.
Attachments
•
cc: Director, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Region II
Director, Hazardous Waste Management Division, Region III
Directors, Air and Waste Management Division, Regions IV, VI,
V I I and V I I I
Directors, Waste Management Division, Regions I and V
Director, Toxic and Waste Management Division, Region IX
Directors, ESD, Regions I, V, VI, VII, VIII and X
-------
o
S AGtNCY FY 1986 PLANNING PROCESS
a\
=»*:
10/11/M
l/JIf/M
tit in
Agency !••«•»•
rcll UU»i l«r
|>toe»«»
rr«*i»M
IM tt*U «l
lor
<«••«
«Mlf*l«
1*
OSWER FY 1986 PLANNING PROCESS
12/ll/M
BS/lt/M
I/I/M
•ukalt Sl»»
OMB* ••tell*
1*1 4t»lt el
••I4»M* lot
4l*ll
STM5 •*
•>••*« an twr«)
•nd ficllBliurf
srws
Ul 4r«li
M by ••» IOM
la
fr*ll •!*••; SIWS
OHMl !•••«•)
(|M| trait
(lac*i petal Ian
AM K*
•••IMM Ml
n •* WAT
(July. l*8«)
(•/II/M)
(•/ll/M)
-------
J
f
D
r»
a/10/U
••rly »/•»
auka>ll
appeala on
Mai»loa4 aaalyal*
la Comptroller
STHS a*aau»a
r««U*4 (TMf
II
!•
I/IO/M
•ally •/•»
tt 4iall al
•utalll*^
to m k»
NO flualltca SfltS
•aaauici and
••I 1*11 lew* Mlih
raaaaack la
ra*laa4
n M SCAf
final n M
K*r la HO
ay laiiloM
OSMU aokailla
4iall STMS
lar«*ta. kaaa4
aa n «4 SCAT
•A/OSWI
aaara>aa ft M
K«r. aa4
avaalla llaal
srm targala
10 OMC
(9/10/B4)
-------
OSWER * 9840./O
SUPERFUNO
COMPQEHENS!VE ACCOM0-:SHM£N~S
PLAN-
'= t 1936
-------
OSNER $ 9840..0
DESCRIPTION OF THE PLAN
DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE ACCOMPLISHMENTS
PLAN .......................... 2
IV. UPDATING AND REVIEWING THE PLAN: Amending the FY 1986
SCAP- and t ne SCA? Review ................ 3
REMOVAL/ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM ............... 3
REMEDIAL/ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM
A . Preliminary Assessments and S;+e Inspections ..... *
B. Site Classification ana Responsible
Darfy Searches ............... . . .5
C . Re Tied i a I I n vs s* i gat i on/Fea si b i • i *y 3* ui ! e s ..... 5
0. Remedial Design and Remeoia! Action ......... 5
E. judicial Enforcement Actions for Private Response . . 7.
F. Cost Recovery Actions ................ 1
3. De ! e> i on ...... . . . . . • ......... . .7
.
V!l. PROGR- SUPPORT DIRECTIVES .
A. Laboratory Analysis Program Support ......... 7
3. Case Budgets ........ ............ 3
C. FIT Track ing .................... 9
VIII. D I OX I,. ACTIVITIES
REGIONAL TARGETS
a* Targets ..... . ............. '< '
2. Regional PA/Si Targets ................ 12
3. Regional Rl/FS Targets - FY 1986 4 FY 1937 ...... ',3
•i . Regional Remedial Oesign Targets ........... '• *
5. Regional Remedial Action Targets ........... 14
5. Regional Deletion Targets .............. 15
7. Enforcement - Regional Targets . ....... . . .16
8. Administrative Enforcement Action Target ....... 17
9. Cost Recovery Action Target ............. 18
10. Judicial Enforcement Action Target .......... 19
i
-------
OSWER ft 9840.0
race
!. Removal Plan For-na* ................. 20
2. Remedial Plan Fo^maT ................ 3'
3. FIT Accomp i i shmenr Scneduie ............. 4-
4. Enforcement Plan Forma"1" ............... A?
«il20END I X
A. FY 1936 Enforcement Program Pie"
B. Remedial Site Activity List . .
-------
OSWER ft 9840.0
Tr.e purpose of t p.e Superfuno Comprehensive Accomp I i s^e .IT s
P'an (SCA?) is to lay OUT, site-by-site, t ne enforcement, re-
sponse, ana s.upporr activities each Region will underrate in
FY 1996. The overall program priorities, guidance end Regie?-.*'
responsibilities are contained in the draft FY 1986 Opera'ing
Sundance, which was sent to the Regional Administrators on
December 18, 1984. IT is crucial that the Regions read tne
C : = ' -i ~ '. r. -^ i.. : c 2 ^. c e c 2 • e * c I i y 5 9 f c - e r - e p 2 r i n c their S C A P . S r - -
material, which last year appeared in The SCAF inST rue* i c~ ; , ; ;
now in the Operating Guidance.
The SCAP will be used by the Assistant Administrate"
for Solid Waste and Emergency Response (AA-OSW-R) to identify
Regional resource needs. Allowances for FY 1986 removal,
remedia1 , enforcement, laboratory, and community relations
activities will oe i ssuec to the Regions Dases on tne SCA?.
Technical assistance, technology transfer, training, anc
emergency preparedness will continue to be directed from
Headquarters. Resources for these activities will not be
provided in Regional allowances. Annual and quarterly
targets for use in the.Admini strat or's Strategic Planning
and Management System (SPMS) are also derived from the SCA°,
thus permitting the Administrator to assess the progress
cf each Region in meeting Superfunc program.objectives.
This year The SCA? will inciuGe outyear (FY 1987)
projections for remedial activities (Ri/FS, RD, and RA).
This is important for identifying candidate sites for remedial
action1 in the near-Term, thus allowing.for measured consider-
ation and discussion of tfve relative priorities of candidate
sites prior to tne f i. seal year in which they are expected
to start. The outyear projections will also include expected
com? tetions, T ni swill also help current and future planning
While it is essential to devote sufficient *Jme a.nd a^*en-
tion to the FY 1987 portion of the SCAP, obviously these
projections will change, perhaps significantly, as we approac
FY 1987. •
I I . DESCRIPTION OF THE PLAN
•
The FY 1986 SCAP is a continuation of the FY 1985 Plan
and contains remedial, enforcement, removal, laboratory and
community relations components. The SCAP is a summary of
all site-related activity planned for the upcoming fiscal
year. For removal activities, the annual plan sets forth
targets for removals at National Priority List (NPL) and
-------
OSVER * 9840.0
"-"-"•". c ~ ? 5 . 2 ~ C s T ~ i 2 S : C 3 2 ~ T S 5- ~ • 5 * * i'J"C5 * ~ " - ~ 2 - -
.t : C •' 2 2 ~ 5 : 3 . 9 -1 - 5 . ^ 5 T 5 2 • 2 , 9 " " 3 r £ a •":£"*, 2 r- S C C P- *•• U ~ i t .
r e • 3 ~ ' c- • s 2 ; ~ ' v i * ; e s are i 3 e .". * '; • • * 5 s " ~~e p- i a n 3 y site
na-ne, Sr2~e, activity tyse, exrec~ec s'art ca*e, ana- es*:T5*e:
ess*, w', 11 a 22s'5"2T'on c* t^e '. ea c c-r ga .-! i r at'• on a°2/or
ctr.er relevant 2a~a elements as shown in t r,e formats. T r>e
total estimated costs in the SCAP will be the basis for t re
Regions quarterly allowance.
III. DEVELOPMENT OF TH£ CQVPREHgNSIVE ACCOMPLISHMENTS PLAN
Regions should have a Site Management Plan (SMP) for
each Superfund sitfe which is-on tne N~L, sro?osec r_- i*-
clusion on the N P L, ' o r listed as a Oioxin Tier 1 or 2 site.
The SMP provides estimated dates when site cleanup activities
will begin in current and future years. Start dates will
be estimates in out-years. This framewor* will establish a
better understanding between a Region and its States asout
t.he schedule for planned activity at each NPL site in FY
1936, FY 1987 and future years. SMP milestones for tne
current fiscal year are translated into tne more detaliec
annual SCAP. Regions ar.e no* required to suomit SMPs to
Headquarters, but the Regional Adminis*rator must certi*y
that SMPs have been developed in the Region and were used
to develop, both the FY 1986 and FY 1987 portions of the
' SCAP. -During the annual Regional evaluation, the HeaCquar-
review team will be looking at the process and results.
t
The SCAP identifies candida*e sites to meet Regional
S?MS targets, and additional si *e s which may also be eligible
for.action during tne fi'scai year. This will ensure that
the plan is sufficiently flexible to accommodate a range of
spending capabilities in the fiscal year. The preliminary
FY 1986 plan is r'eviewec in Headquarters, adjusted as neces-
sary to re*!-ect tne expected fisca! year budget, anc passec
bacK to the Region.
EachRegion will suomit two copiesof the preliminary
FY 1986 SCAP oy January 30, 1985 to Terry Ouverson (WH-5^3D;
who will then distribute them tp the appropriate Headquarters
offices for review and comment. After a brief review period,
discussions will be held between Headquarters and Regions,
during which the preliminary FY 1986 plan will be tailored
to tit the fiscal year budget. These discussions w.i II end
February 28, 1985. This deadline is necessary because the
SCAP information will be used as input to the FY 1986
Regional worKtoad»modeI s. The computations for Regional
FTE allocation are due td'the Comptroller on March 1 ,. 1985.
By-July 24, 1985, an adjusted SCAP, shall be approve^
by the Regional Administator and submitted to the AA-OSwEI
Upon approval of the AA-OSwER, the FY 1986 SCAP will be
-------
OSWER # 9840.0
? ^
1966 5CA? ano me SCAP Review
\a j u stments and amendments to the remedial component
.of the. SCAP .are .d i scussed more fully I n t he instructions
for •''•he remedial component and closely follow the fY 1995
procedures. In general, changes to the SCAP, which wculd
alter tt>e e stab! 1 shed 5PMS targets or exceed ^ He Regional
advir-s c* allowance, require «eadquart«-s approval. Other
cftaag-es refliiirs onl y —HOT i f i CST i on TO -Heac^uarTer s.
ui ar1 y sc"hedu1 «d 5 CAP -w-or-ksnops-, conference cai! s,
or otner revie-* mechanisms are ordinarily t tve form for
amending the SCAP. However, after written notification,
the SCAP -may be amended, at any ti-nve. The SCA? does no^
•n-eed *o be amenoeo to -nitiate remove! activities. However,
•frve SCA9 snouid b«-. a mended at tne end of -earn quarter to
refi-ecf ail unanticipated ac*ivity.
At the end of t-he se-cond ana third quarters o* FY 1986,
- a SCAP workshop .( Sim! l ar to SCAP workshops and conference
calls that wiii oe held during FY 1935). will be conducted
•between the Region and Headquarters. The. purpose of r ne se
reviews is to assess pert ormence during the past quarter(s),
and to revise and update the succeed i ng q uarter ' s SCAP.
.These reviews will be conducTed via conference calls, work-
•shop s , or other mechanisms. During the fourth quarter the
frequency of commun i cat i on s will toe increased to ensure
that year t y TnrgeT'S and program priorities will be met. A
weThod" tor hand 1 i ng fourth q.uarter obligations and the
^•squ i *"ea shifting of funds among regions to ensure proper
fiscal management will oe developed durl-ng ft 1985.
V. R€*OV-AL/rEHf ORCEMENT
Regional removal targets ana a i 1 owances are based primar-
ily on projected TY 1985 accompli shwent s and expenditures.
Response Targets have >een esTabl i shed for tooth NPL and non-
MPL removal s, al tho-ugh It is recosniaed that the latter is
largely ainant J c i pated and carinoT be planned. These targets
are based or\ historical patterns and o-n average removal costs
The allowances issued for removal actions are intended to
-fuTitJ all i-nc itJents, and '-each Region snout d establish its
own contingency reserve fc^r unanticipated removals.
i
The SCAP shows the number of projected starts and com-
pletions and actual starts and completions, for NPL sites
and nw-NPL incidents. It also lists actual ongoing removals
-------
SWER # 9840..0
3.-
~ D S P '• 2 ~ 1 6 0
w! : = "!o*
anc *i . stress acc
ofeacnquarrsr.
-'S'e s i ~5- spec i f ; c reporting a~ - ne enc
Enforcement targets for aoministrative orders are based
on projected removal activity. Both unilateral and consent
administrative orders for removal response will be counted
towards the removal order target. CERCLA §106 orders for
access are to be reported but will not count against the
removal' order targe*. A continued empnasis in FY 1986 will
be to take §106 (or RCRA §7003) judicial actions for selected
removal situations 'see RemovaI/Enforcement Program) or for
col lection of penalties f o1" non-comp! iance with orders.
FY 1936 targets heve been set for eacn of these two areas.
A new addition in FY 1986 wi!! focus on RP searches completed
at all non-NPL removal sites. Credit will be given for
completed searches. The Regional targets appear on page 16.
In FY 1986, we will initiate cost recovery negotiations
at all completed removal activities. Targets are based on pas
completions. Cost recovery referral targets for FY 1936 are
set as a combined target for removal and remedial activities
Even so, each region win 2e de-signaled sub-targets for rem
and remedial based on completions anticipated. If completio
do not occur as planned in one area or the other, substituti
may occur in order to achieve the combined target. Regions
wi'.l be required to develop a strategy for negotiations,
settlements or judicial actions for all completed removal
and remedial actions beginning in FY 1986. In addition to
negotiations for cost recovery at removal actions, we will
negotiate and give credit for negotiations conducted prior to
the actua1 removal action. Regional targets apoear en page
' £
V 1 . REMEDIAL/ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM
A. Preliminary Assessments (PA) and Site Inspections (SI)
The goal of the pre-remedia) site evaluation program is
to complete PAs on all sites included in the inventory as of
January 1984 by the end of FY 1986 and all Sis on these sites
by the end of FY 1987. During FY 1986, we expect the Regions
to negotiate for States to conduct most, if not al I , of the
PAs using CERCLA cooperative agreement funds. Nationally
we expect FIT to perform a-frproxi mate I y 50$ of the Sis that
are done in FY 1986. PA and SI reporting* for SPMS will
be provided quarterly from CERCLIS. The output from CERCL
on the first Friday following the close of the quarter wil
be compared to the Regions' quarterly targets for PAs and
Sis.
t
-------
OSWER # 9840.0
. ~ . Z . , i 3 r • .; 2 , Ma 5 5 . , 97-.; an; 3 •< 2 C " ' -J ' ~
-A, 5;, vig-agene-i r A ss; sr.-jrce CM-.:, 5 i 73- ; -. spec* i en
•j? =''£•--•; See :efi-iitic-i3 on ;ace 44'. T-.e Rec:3ns
i":;ca~e if o re-NP L act i /i 7 / »}'., DC i-jroe-: UTC er 3 Wu; ~ i -
SiTe Cooperatvie Agreemenr (MSCA) vehicle. Tne Regions
should indicate how many PAs, Sis, MAs, and SlFs will be
purchased with the funds. How many are purchased will
not necessarily have any relationship to SPMS targets,
since in many statesmany PAs and Sis to be accompli shed i n
FY 1986 were already purchased in FY 1985. Plus, Regions
may negotiate for more PAs and Sis than absolutely necessary
in craer to insure that sufficient PA/SIs are received to
meet Regions' SPMS targets. See page 37 for an example OT
how PA/SIs should be reported in the SCAP.
In developing planned amounts for PA, Si, and MA activ-
ities, the Regions should use $1,700 per PA, $16,500 per SI,
$150 per MA. (See definitions on page 44.) If the Region
Dei ieves these figures are inadequate and uses different
standard multiples, it should be noted in the SCAP submission
We have not provided any figures for SIF costs. Therefore,
the Regions must indicate the value used to determine SIF
budget for a particular state.
B. Site Classification and Responsible Party Searches
T .-j program objective for FY 1986 is to complete, during
the course of the year, potential responsible party (?RP)
searches and site classification for all sites currently on
the promul gated NPL and for all sites that are on or will
be formally proposed for inclusion on the NPL in FY 1966
throug- the Federal Register publication. In the FY 1986
SCAP you will only be able to count RP searches for the NPL
update.s proposed for FY ',986. We are establishing a separate
target for RP searches aT sites where a remova1 action i s
being considered. As in FY 1985, negotiations wit! be in-
itiated for all enforcement-lead and Fund/Negotiated RI/FS
and T ne i r • su-b sequent RD/RA. Credit will be given for t ne se
activities. The targets appear on page 16.
C. Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (Rl/FS)
The goal for each Region is to develop a management
strategy for ensuring that RI/FS work at sites is completed
on schedule, so the remedial design/remedial action (RD/RA)
phases can be started as quickly as possible. This managemen
scheme shalI focus on qua! ity and time! iness of activities,
as Rl/FS are pu shed t hrou{fh the reined ial,pipeline to compieti
Regions must expedite workplan development and keep both
fund and enforcement-lead projects on schedule.
The FY 1986 annual targets for Regional Fund-lead RI/FS
starts (broken down by Fund, enforcement., and PRP-lead) are s,
-------
. ^ Remeci-2;
5 : s~ srio* s z
' ?-3- ,
r
jeered r Y 1936 ano FY
OSWER # 9840.0
-r *•=•:' 2. 3':s''. -5 as se~ f ?.-•:•> o--,
~ e i . c ~ i v i - y ' i st i s -3 r c v '• 3 e c '."i A o : e n c
-•?* ac~; / ; - i e s , i nc i jd;-"!c st a r-- 5 T nr c
9i5 new starts from t ne SCf*.3, 2"" ?"o-
337 new st a - 1 s based en F e a s i a i i i t y
Stucy Comp let ions and standard timelines. This list snouid oe
used as a guide to assist you in developing your FY 1986 and
FY 1987 pians.
An important dimension of the RI/FS activity continues
to be PRP assumption and preparation of RI/FS. The policies,^
procedures, and Regions' responsibilities are fully explained
in the March 20, 1984 RI/FS Enforcement Guidance. You should
refer to this document during your FY 1986 cianni^g. ~ n^-
national target for PRP RI/FS is 50. Tables on page 13 a~: '6
show regional targets, as well. These numbers are for resource
dis+riDUtion purposes and assume that PRP takeovers will be
proportional to the number of RI/rS i n i t i at i on s. Regions will
not be measured against these targets. Regions are expected
*o replace PR? takeovers with new projects up *o the i'mi* of
the budget. Approximately 20* of the targeted Enforcement
RI/FS may be designated for State Enforcement-lead sites.
Negotiation targets wil! be based on all RI/FS starts.
D. Remedial Design and Remedial Action
The first objective is to move all projects that are
through Record of Decision to the design phase. The rY 1935
national target of 89 Fund-financed designs is shown by Region
on page 14. This i s a_ form i dabi e goa t . Pipeline projects
must be closely tracke"d to ensure that FY 1986 commitments
are met. Regional targets for FY 1987 design starts have not
been e-stabl ished. In stead, the eventual targets will, oe based
on Regional commitments made in the FY 1987 portion of Tne SCA
The second objective is to move every project where desig
is comoieted to construction as soon as possible. The regiona
targets for 56 Fund-financed remedial actions are set forth on
page 14. Additional reporting requirements are set forth in
the Discussion of the Remedial Program Plan beginning on page
3*. As with remedial designs, FY 1987 remedial action targets
will be based on the commitments shown in the FY 1987 portion
of the SCAP.
Negotiation targets for RD/RA will be set based'on RI/FS
completions. Continued expansion of the use of adm i n i strat-i ve
order authorities is planned for FY 1936. Program objectives
are to (a) issue CERCLA 51*06 orders prior to undertaking RD/R.-
projects at approximately 5055 of the candidate sifes; (b) ag-
gressively use RCRA 53013 orders at Superfund sites to su|
remedial investigation activity; and (c) expand the prograt
i ssuing RCRA §3008 orders enforcing against parties who fai^
or inadequately respond to information request letters.
-------
OSWER # 9840.0
•~~,~~ *~ ' 5 ~ e - = ; =•; ::. * s T; - ~ a:->'-!- 3-- = -',= ~ r - •? - 3 c a u n ~
*3«3"-= ~ •* ~2^5?ts set •-i - ~: 3 2-e». R-35! c^ 5 are -s^ues'ej
tc p-rCjecT r'' ' *-2? CERCLA §'J5 administrative orse's ~or RD/Rn
o a s a c on ;• r o _ 5 c ~ -2 o R 1 / ? S c 5 m o ' e r i 2 n s . See D 2 2 -2 '• ~ .
E. Judicial Enforcement Actions for Private Response
One program objective for FY 1936 is to initiate-new
CERCLA §106 (or RCRA 57003) judicial actions at enforcement-
lead sites wnere a feasibility study has been completed to
compel PRPs to undertake RD/RA. Amendment of already referred
_R_C_R_A__$_7_003 .cases will not be counted against the target. Amend-
ments of §107 actions to include §106 actions will oe counted
in meeting the target,, Regions are requested to project F Y
1987 CERCLA §106 actions for RD/RA cased on projected RI/FS
completions. See page 19.
F. Cost Recovery Actions
An additional target has been added for submission of cost
documentation checklists which snould generally be planned for
one quarter prior to initiating negotiations. Regions will be
required to develop strategy for negotiations, settlements or
judicial actions for a I I sites where cost recovery actions have
matured, beginning in FY"l986. Referrals for joint §106/107
claims or referrals which are simply adding claims for adminis-
trative COSTS to existing §1C6 claims will not count again st t r
target. Joint claims sh'ould be counted as Judicial Enforcemen'
Actions for Private Response (§106 "eferrals). Regions are
requested to project FY 1987 CERCLA §107 remedial cost recover^
referral s based on projected completions of remed:2i projects.
See page 18.
G . D-e ! e t i o n
As t ne program enters FY '986, the de'.etion of sites
from the NP'_ is an important priority. Pursuant to the
March 27, 1964, interim deletion procedures, tne Regions
should work closely with Headquarters to submit complete
deletion packages. Regions will establish targets based
on a careful assessment of the technical information required
to justify a deletion request. These candidates for deletion
will be included in the FY 1986 SCAP submission.
VII. PROGRAM SUPPORT DIRECTIVES
A. Laboratory Analysis Program Support
--•*•
t
Guidance concerning revised estimation techniques for
projecting FY 1965 analytic support service requirements
has been developed. This is being furnished separately and
is now, or will shortly be in the hands of the ESD Director.
That guidance contains instructions and worksheets for doc-
-------
OSWER # 9840.0
he -ie« ~ec 11 : •: us ^s nseoe^ ~o -s^sjre -*va- samp •. e ana^/ses
are proper:/ scnec-j;ec anc * r.at su^il;'-en- '•2DO!-atory capac'"/
1 a ! n
Pages 53-54 contain charts for reporring summary FY
1986 analytic services data. Summary information is needed
now for long range planning. In completing these charts,
Regions should folio* the revised FY 1985 approach mentioned
a bove .
Based on the final negotiated targets in the SCAP,
annual Regional allocations of projected CLP capacity will
be provided by mid-August. Monthly allocations for the
first quarter wil! be provided in September. Thereafter,
monthly allocations will be provided at the end of each
month for the subsequent tnree months (adjusted as needed
based on actual avai'aole capacity). For example, at t ne
end of October, initial January allocations will be provided
and, if needed, previous November ano December allocations
will be revised. T;iis will provide an updated three-month
projection on an ongoing monthly basis.
Regarding the BSD laboratory sample load, you should
continue to consider 'that special actions, priorities,
samples needing immediate turn-around a n.d some of the
enforcement samples will oe processed internally. We are
working with the Office of Regional Operations regarding
ESO roles and will provide more specific guidance prior
to development of the final SCAP. At present, your esti-
mates should -take into account that there may be increases
for staffing and equipment upgrades at the ESO laboratories.
You should specifically relate ESO laboratory sample load
to your resource estimates.
3 . Ca se Suoget s
Extramural support of ongoing enforcement activities •* : '. !
be coordinated through the case budgeting process. OWPE has
various contract resources available, including Technical
Enforcement Support (TES) I, TES M and .the Interagency
Agreements with the U.S. Geological Survey and the Army Corps
of Eng i neer s.
Each Region will be given a I i
-------
OSWER # 9840.0
* ' • 2 : SC ;•? a ' '. ; C 3 ~ •? ; ~ j 50?pCf~_Ris::O--J.
' •? * ; c - * o.- ~ .= "i e i ~ 2 : * : 3 •! s « ~ : c ~ ~ 2 •-• r ; => •= n ;• 5 r e r - e - - o 3 3 - :> ~
2 --5 sc •ad u . ec - c~ - eg D~ ; 2r i or, , ; i ~ I 3- '• 3n , 3C "n i n ' s~ "s ~ '• ••'2
acr'ons or where c v 9 - 5 i i n* OT ;-i/are-oai"Ty response is
necessary. Eacn ^eg^on s^ou'C prov'ae an estimate or ex~ra-
•nura^ resources necessary to Sucpcrr - -,e se activities 3a sec
on inoividua! sife characteristics. All nenbers of the
negotiation/litigation team, including DOj where applicable,
.must be involved in * hese initial estimates. Some extramural
dollars will be available in FY 1986 for a pilot program of
funding states tor oversight of private-party response at
State-enforcement lead sites. Estimates should be made basea
on the guidance that was issued for the FY 1985 SCAP.
Oncei Headquarters receives the Regional proposal s, a
Regional Budget Target will be developed based on the Regions
projected support needs compared to the overall extramural
budget. The Region's are then free to distribute these
resources among active Regional lead cases. Headquarters
will continue to process the necessary paperwork to inititate
the contract process.
C . FIT Tracki ng
The Field Investigation Teams are an important resource
in t he accomplishment of remedial/enforcement targets and
goa:s. As delineated intheFlT AccompiishmentsSchedul. e,
numerous activities are pe'rformed by FIT. The Regions
should be planning the use of this resource and tracking
resource utilization. Regions must submit FIT estimates in
advance. Regions should keep an accounting of FIT usage.
VIM. DIOXIN ACTIVITIES
^
By the end of FY 'i985, Regions should have completed
preliminary invesTigationsat ail identified Tier la ano
I la d i ox i n sites and should have completed all workpians
for response actions at Tier I and I I sites and initiatec
response actions at Tier la and Ma sites. Targets have
been set for the following program goals in FY 1985: (a)
completion of all workpians for response' actions at alt
Tier la I and Ma sites, and {b) i n i t i at i on of response
actions at any Tier IM-VM sites referred to OSWER by the
Office of Water Regulations and Standards.
Response actions include the development and execution
of work plans for the elimination of hazards associated with
the site, whether the response will be fund-financed, enforce-
ment/PRP lead or state-lead. Tier I, la,'II and Ma sites
which have been screened and found not to be contaminated
with TCDO may count as response actions completed, as no fur-
ther response action will be taken except possibly to address
problems associated with other hazardous substances.
-------
OSWER # 9840.0
-------
OSWER # 9840.0
FY 1986 SCAR TARGETS
-------
OSNER * 9840.0
REGION-
*!•''•
-3m 195
NPL
2
4
c
^
5
4
3
2
3
3
2
4 Ac com: • ' = nmsnr 3)
START
NON-NPL
8
13
• 7 "5
21
32
12
13
6
12
8
COMPLET
IONS
NPL NON-NPL
4
4
Z.
4
7
3
2
3
3
1
8
13
27
21
35
12
15
6
"'2.
7
I V
V
V 1
V I I
VIII
IX
X
TOTAL 33 157 ' 36 156
-------
OSWER # 9840.0
= - r • : v ' ••) - - •' j s z T T ; v r \, -
s D .~( : r .*» — i ->. : 3 v c T j
REGION FY !»c
EA-
1 240
1 1 900
1 1 1 430
IV 1,135
V 1,295
VI 100
V 1 1 255
VIII 220
•IX 330
X 3 1 0
JNC S 1TE
•.SGE'S 3V f
5
11
55 .
200
100
280
325
120
90
60
80
70
i M c c ; ."• •*• : ~ . \ £
. 'N w - • w . » •—
REGION
FY 1
£1
253
949
453
1 ,198
1 ,366
105
269
232
343
327
986
11
59
216
108
302
351
129
97
65
36
75
5215 -.380 5,500 >-
TOTAL 5./I3
-------
R!/-5 CAND1DATES
OSWER # 9840.0
^ E 3 i w .
;
i 1
1 1 1
! V
V
V 1
VII
VIM
! X
X
- -
^
TOTAu NATIONAL
TARGET
REGION
t -
1
1 1
1 1 1
IV
V
V 1
V 1 1
VIM
IX
X
__
=9CGRAM
z
14
8.
10
20
1
4
3
' i
4
^ ^^"
78'
PROGRAM
3
14
3
10
20
1
4
4
1 1
4
-
= - • ? 3 5
?NFG?.C£M£>T
^
13
6
6
14
3
1
1
3
1
-^— — ^•••^
„ . ^ _— ^ ^— • — -
52
FY 1987
ENFORCEMENT
4
13
6
6 ;
1 4
3
1
.-r 1
3
1
?RP
•3
12
5
6
14
2
2
1
2
3
_^-^_ ^^^^•^•^
^^^^^^•^^^^^^^^^^
50
PRP
3
12
5
6
14
2
2
, 1
2
3
„.
-37AJ.
* ^i
39
19
22
43
6
7
5
1 6
3
•-^^^•^^^^^^••^^^^
l^^BIW"^^"^^^^^^^^^
180 '
TOTAL
13
39
19 •
22
48
6
7
5
16
8
.
TOTAL NATIONAL
78
52
180
-------
OSWER # 9840.0
REGION TARGET
I I 15
III 12
IV 11.
V 22
VI 10
VII 1.
V I I I 2
IX . 6
X 3
TOTAL ' .89
1986 REMEDIAL ACTION REGIONAL TARGE'S
FUND-FINANCED
REGION TARGET
I 6
II 11
-IL.I 11
IV ; 6 '
V . .10
V I 6
VII 0
VIII**" 2 ,
IX 2
X 2
TOTAL 56
-------
OSHER # 9840.0
5< 3QgL.M-NASY = c^NAL CELSTlDN TAR^FTS - ?" 1986
Regions Number^oLlIliJ*
I
I I
! V
V
V I
V 1 I
V I I
IX
X
^Targets to be provided by Regions.
-------
OSNER * 9840.0
-l?ss s'i? T^SrETS
:.«si?. t ?..?. SEA?.:H£S: R«V>-. :F.:E-£
:o
u*i-<» • V • • ••* *<• * ••• *j** * • •»•
Sta! fitri jBwisK-ta! fir;. s;;ts
6 . a I
s ?u:. fSiVS't ?ARTY R£a?w!«s£:MV:HL. . ie
36
e : 14
.
i ; 3
2 ! 11 2
?:?. ?«iv6Ts fns- «s?-:!iss:?,:/?s .so
14 : 3i : 29 i 10 : .10: 5
• . I I
!4 ! 22 i 4S : si 7 . 5 '. 14
t i ; « • '
11 : .12 . 26 i ;* ' 4 : u : 7
:ASK!HiST8ATiVE £N?uR:£R£KT ACTlOSr-ns
e .
;< ; 2s i ia • 'io
ii - 13 : ? : . is i. '.«• : ! s .3 :
.iD»:KIsTfiHTiV£
IVE ENruRCENENT ACTI^S-^Ol* ORDERS'.
3 : 4 ; 2 , 2 :
OSIKSsTMT-VE ENFGSCsNE*: «T!3Ns-s:WS a
3 ; s
:;iii::>L EM?uRC£KENT ftLT!DS5:T?>0.?I.PENALTIES I 1 ; 1 : ' 1 : l-l 1 I i 1
i . i i i i
-ar 5ECWCTV CKCKUSTS:liaBVAL 1 5 : 10 : 25 ! 15 1 10 : 3
C35? REuJVESY Q£CKi.:STS:RBKBIAL
0 i
.-•**
.:2sT SERVER1! ACT13HS RErEn-ES TS sS-«tHCVft5. ! • ; 2 : si * • 9 '. 2
.:D5T REMVEfiY ACTIONS RErESRE!- Tu Ht-nEREulAL ! 1 : « '- i i 1 '. 0 ', 1
II-ICJIK RE5?ONSE ACTIONS.TIERS i.ifc.-l.IIA
i ; 10 : 0' i o : o
1 i 1
5 : to
-------
QSNER # 984°-
REGION
ANNUAL TARGET:
Administrative Enforcement Action - Remedial
SITE/STATE
TYPE
FY 87 Quarter
2 3
-------
OSWER * 9840.0
REGION
ANNUAL TARGET:
Cost Recovery Actions Referred to Hdqt - Remedial
FY a" Quarter
SITE/STATE
TYPE
-------
OSWER # 9840.0
REGION!
ANNUAL TARGET:
Administrative Enforcement Actions to Hdqt (106/7003)
SITE/STATE TYPE FY 87 Quarter
-------
OSWER # 9840.0
FY 1986 SCAP
REPORTS AND INSTRUCTIONS
-------
OSWER % 9840.0
T-e rs-ncva1 componen- si * -e SCAP cors: st s c: *nree
sections: t ie Amuai Re-nova! Plans and Accomp i i shrr.enr s Sum-
mary, the Quarter!y Removal Plans a no Accomplishments Summa r/
and the Additional Quarterly Remova!program Accomplishments
(SPMS). Detailed instructions and definitions are provided
below for each.
Annual Removal Plans anq Accomplishments Summary
This section will be prepared -by the Regions and HQ and
submitted to OERR as par- of the overall annual SCAP. Only
the number of projected starts and completions are requireo;
identification of sites by name wiM be provided on trie
Quarterly Summary. Financial obligations are at so recorded.
The Annual Summary wi I I report bo*h plans and accomoi i shments
and will be updated quarterly.
I. Removal Response Summary
Annual targets for. starts and completions of NPl and
Non-NPL removaI sites will be negotiated with the Regions
and finaii-zed by Headquarters (Sefer to page 11 for propos
Regional targets.) Regions will then provide projecti-ons
'for how many removals will be started and comp-leted during
ea'ch quarter over the course of the fiscal year. Accomp! isn
ments and ongoing actions will be reported at each quarter's
end .
To modify annual projections, Regions should add actual
accompj i shments from previous quarters to revi sed projections
for future quarters. Revised annual projections appear in the
far right column of the Annual Summary.
Oe f i n i t i on s:
8 Start s - number of removal s where on-site wor* has
commenced and the six month limit has begun.
• Comp1et i on s - number of removal s where the OSC
completes on-site action and demobilizes.
• Ongoi ng - number of removal s started in any prior
quarter, and currently ongoing. (To be reported as
accomplishments only; projections are not necessary
t
II. Removal Financial Summary
Headquarters will issue Regional financial
all removal activities during FY 1986. Regions
allowance
should use
-------
.- - ,„ CSWER # 9840.0
""•=:•? ~^~r S "C ; •" 3 I e C ~ ~~5 ! 9 v S • of T -j 1 jj ; n •; r9G'Jr'"30 f S r
•i = -_ -2T10V5 s 3 rv; r 3-i - >4 P L. • e Ti o •> 2 : s in aacn ;u5r~9<". Re3! or. 3
3 -i s -J • : 2 • so e 5T 2:;' i = n a con r'ngency reserve far jnanricipa^ec
r 9 nova; s. 3-o j ec * > or s shou'o be maae for 3!' categories,
r 3r eac 'n quar-er .
Actual obligations (i.e., Del i very Ord er s, not Procure-
ment Requests) should be reported for NPL and non-NPL removal s
only; ac*ual contingency obligations need not oe reported
separately because those funds will be represented as either
NPL or non-NPL expenditures.
Ke 3? OR Sc S
Responses are those removal-type actions undertaken
by potentially responsible parties as a result of EPA efforts.
AM incidents where PRPs undertake.a removal action for which
the approval processing had begun should be reported here.
Tnis includes PRP cleanup undertaken in response to unilateral
AOs, negotiated consent AOs, or consent decrees. Voluntary
PRP cleanup should not be included.
De f i n i t i on s:
0 PRP Starts - number of incidents where PRP nas
mobilized cleanup contractors on-site to conduct
removal tynp-e- act i on s in response to unilateral AOs,
negotiating consent'AOs or consent decrees.
o PRP CompIet i on s - number of incidents wnere PRP has
completed removal type work and demobilized.
^
IV. Removal Enforcement Summary
Targets for Administrative Orders for Removals, and
Cost Recovery Referral s for Removal actions will be negotiated
wirh the Regions and finalized by Headquarters (See page 16
for proposed targets). Regions will provide projections
for the number to be completed in each quarter. While names
of sites will not be required in the annual plan for admin-
istrative orders, the names of sites to be referred for cost
recovery actions should be listed. This will enable Head-
quarters to assure that the appropriate cost documentation
is available prior to referral. No targets are provided for
removal negotiations, as such, but targets are provided for
all categories of negotiations. The number of removal
negotiations initiated should be reported at the end of each
quarter.
-------
OSWER # 9840.0
Plans gr.c -.CCSTIP -. • snmen- 5 Rec or
•/ . 5 and PRP C1 eanup s
~nis seer ion consists Di 3 sec* i'sr 3': Ongoing Removals,
Planned Starrs (-which inc'udesCompietionsand Obligations),
and PRP Cleanups. This will identify planned actions and
actual accomplishments in a site specific format. In
addition, ongoing actions started in a previous quarter
are listed. This should represent all removal activity
taking place in the quarter. The number of sites listed in
each category should be the same number entered in the "P"
and "A" columns for that quarter in the Annual Removal Plans*
and'AccompI i shments Summary. Regions need not submit firs*
quarter reports as part of the preliminary SCAP. T r.« se
reports should be submitted on August 21, 1985.
Def i n i t i on s:
0 Start s - number of removal s where on-site work
has commenced and the six month I imit has begun.
o CompIet i on s - number of removal s which the OSC
completes and demobilizes.
• Ongoi ng - number of removal s started in a previo
quarter, currently ongoing. (To be reported as
compl i shed start and projected and accompl i shed
como I et i on s) .
° Co st - planned or actual obligations for each
removal during the quarter of submission. (Obliga-
tions = Delivery Order, Executed IAG, Letter Contra
Notice to Proceed, or Order for Services).
• Comment s - should indicate any reasons for delay O"
discrepancies between projections and actual
accompl i s hment s.
Unanticipated removals will not ae shown in the "PLND
Start" column, but should be reported at the end of a quarter
as actual starts, with the designation N/A entered into the
"PLND START" columns when you report your quarterly accomp-
I i s hment s.
Planned and actual obligations are also reported on the
quarterly reports. These planned and actual obligations mus
correspond with the quarterly figures shown on the Financial
Summary portion of the ATinual Summary Cjhart.
Regional Removal Program personnel must coordinate
Enforcement Program personnel to complete this report.
"PLND" data is required. Ongoing and new PRP response
actions will be reported as accomplishments, at the end o
-------
OSWER ft 9840.0
.-a
io- •«-:;:'-, T ^s 5?3-ova; processing ^ad begun snoot -3 oe re?pf*e-.
^.e'a. ?5.? c '• ear. up s «iii c» : ; 57 9 a i •-> This section ^rom
^ja-~er T.- Qu3~~3r -j~ *!" a comp.e'ion !s re?or*ec.
'nformaTion submitted by Regions in 7. he i r Quarterly
Reports will be verified and compiled by ERD for presentation
to the Assistant Administrator, ERD will return to the
Regions a copy of the final quarterly report subsequent to
t he AA ' s br i ef i ng .
-------
OSWER # 9840.0
^3w i ~.~N^_ ;:J.-"E^_' ^£<«'Cv-,v. = -.03?.-Yi -.CwC'M°_ 3HMEN75
Additional 0 u a •" ~ g r i v Removal " •* :> c. r g m A c ; o m g i ' s r.m e n •*•
Tnis summary «as developed as a joint effort oy Headquarters
and the Regional Removal orancn Cniefs, ana represents a consensus
of important removal accompl i shments not reflected el sew tie re in
the SCAP 0 It also delineates accompl i shment s made in t he Oil
Program,, These accomplishments will be used for workload modeling
and program evaluation, and have been developed in conformance
with SPMS reporting requirements. No projections are required
for these activities.
I. CERCLA PROGRAM
# of Designated Hazardous Substance Notifications
# of Other Notifications (non-CWA)
# of PRP, State, or Local Cleanups where EPA
Provided On-Scene Oversight
# of On-site Removal Investigations
# of Action Memos Prepared
# of Cost Recovery Packages Prepared by Removal
•Program Staff
# of PRP Response Plans Prepared by Removal Program
Staff for CERCLA 106 Orders
# of Spill Violations Referral.s Prepared
# of Non-notification Referral s Prepared
# of Community Relations Profiles Preparec
# of Community Relations Plans Prepared
I I . 01L PROGRAM
# of Or'l Spill Notifications
# of CWA-funded Oil SpiI I s Cieaned Uo by EPA
# of PRP, State, or Local Cleanups Where EPA
Provided On-Scene Oversight
# of Cost Recovery Packages Prepared
# of Non-notification Referral s Prepared
# of Sp iI I V i olati on Referral s to USCG
# of SPCC Inspections/Reviews
# of SPCC Facilities In/Out of Compliance at
Time of Inspection (IN)
(OUT)'
(NOT REGULATED)'
# of SPCC Violation Warning.Betters Issues
# of SPCC NOVs Issued or Referral Packages'Prepared
# of SPCC Facilities Brought into Compliance
# of FEMA Damage Survey Reports
# of FEMA Disaster-Related Inspections
-------
;-: ^3: OSWER ft 9840.0
NC~:fICST!ons - Number of HOTi *icat 1 ons raceivec, pro-
cassea,. -ana : oggec by EPA. Count should NOT -nci-i
s~2*3-"JSCG not '<• f : cat : o^ s f3--wafcsed ex po st - a c T c *
mcntni/ summaries unless foil owed up oy E?A. Coun
should include potential releases, notifications no
recognized by CERCLA (e.g., harmless substances, sp i i i s
below RQ) , and spills at waste sites if reported to
EPA. Reports o-f releases involving chemical s not
designated under CERCLA should be counted as "OTHER".
Dupl i cate reports on the same incident should not be
EPA On-Scene Oversight at Non-Federa 1 I y-F undsd Removals -
Number of incidents cleaned up by the responsible party
(RP), State, local authorities, or other party where tie
3iUk) or CERCLA funds are not invoked, but where EPA
(or TAT) provides on- scene oversight and technical
assistance to ensure that adequate cleanup takes place.
EPA funded removals should NOT be counted in this
category. Inciaents where the State conducts a removal
through. a cooperative agreement or contract should not
be counted in this category. A single incident should
be counted ONLY ONCE no matter how many t i me s a n EPA
OSC (or TAT) goes back on-scene or how many phases the
response entai Is.
Qn-Site Removal Investigations - A removal investigation
may be conducted by EPA ana/or TAT, and must include
an on-site component, such as a walk around survey or
samp I ing, to be counted as an output for thi s category.
Investigations conducted entirely by the State should
not be counted in this category.
Action Memos Prepared - Number of action memos prepared,
Count should include all memos prepared even if the
removal action is not approved or a Non-Federal party
assumes responsibility for the cleanup.
PRP Response Plans - Number, of re sp.on se plans removal
staff prepared to detail what cleanup measures the
potentially responsible party should be required to
take under a CERCLA 106 administrative order.
Spill Violation Referrals - Number of referrals to EPA
or the Coast Guard for violation of CWA Section 311(b)(3
for the discharge of oil or CWA hazardous substances
into navigable water»«.
Non-notification Referral s - Number of referrals for
-------
- 26 "-""
OSWER # 9840.0
non-no~ '• r 1 ca~ i on c i =T o!i ;i- hasaraccs suostance
-a'.aase 23 -so-'-3-: :•/ Sec*'en ";D2(2: c* CE-.-LA cr
Section 3 1 • ( b ) \ 5 ) of t .ne C'ean Water ACT.
Community Re'. 3* ions 3rp* j i e - A 5 ho-*
relations plan wnicn is a brief analysis of tne nature
of citizen concerns, the key site issues, and program
objectives that must be prepared for removal actions
lasting longer than five days, but less than 45 days.
Community Relations Plan (CRP) - The planning, manage-
ment, and budget document that guides a community
relations program at Superfund sites. ACRP is prepared
for all removals lasting longer than 45 days. The
basic components of the plan are an assessment of
citizen concerns and a description of twoway communi=>
cation activities, based on on-site discussions, conducts
at the site.
CWA-funded Oil Spills Cleaned Up by EPA - Number of
spills cleaned up by EPA using CWA 311(k) funds. A
single incident should be counted ONLY ONCE regardless
of how many times an EPA OSC (or TAT) goes back on scene,
or how many phases the response entai I s.
SPCC Inspections/Reviews - Number of spill prevention
compl iance. reviews performed by EPA and/or TAT. Counf|
should include both on-site inspections and detailed
plan reviews. Follow up inspections at a single fac
may be counted separately.
Facilities In, Out of, "Brought Into Compliance - For
the purposes of data collection, facilities should be
considered in compliance if the operator presents to
t'PA or its representative a certified, implemented plan
which has been -eviewed and amended as required by 40
CFR 112. Facilities inspected which turn out not to
be regulated under 40 CFR 112 (e.g., those that have
too little storage capacity to qualify or are transpor-
tation-related) should be counted as "Not Regulated."
Warning Letters Issued - Any written communication
(with the exception of an NOV) which notifies a facility
of non-compliance with 40 CFR 112.
NOVs Issued or SPCC Referral Packages Prepared - If NOV s
are issued directly by removal personnel, the region
should count the number of NOVs issued as.the output
for this category. -«i f removal personnel document and
package all the evidence necessary to issue the NOV,
but legal counsel or enforcement personnel actually
issues the legal document, then the Region should coi
-------
OSNER # 9840.0
*-9 Tumoer of -5i^T2, packages praoareo as T -->e. ou *? u~
;cr T,; s •ca-ego-y. 3o-:i OO-PJTS are consiaerso sq-j'-
va',.ent for data coi -action pu'~?cses. Regions shou'. d
cocinr EITHER NOVs or raferra! packages';- aocunen^ packages
anc referra'. s snou: i not 33 soup:.e counrea.
Damage Survey Reports - Number of damage survey reports
written or coordinated by removal personnel pursuant
to Section 302 of the Disaster Relief Act to assess
damage to water supply, storm drainage, and wastewater
treatment facilities after a Federally declared disaster.
PEMA In spect i on - Number of interim or final inspections
conducted, oocumented, or coorai.nated by removal person-?
to appraise restoration efforts at water supply, storm
arainage, or waste water treatment facilities as part
of EPA's assistance to FEMA under the Disaster Relief
Act.
-------
REC1ON 0«)
o
•
o
*v
00
ANNUAL 9
TARGET 0 J'LNO ACTL
PLND ACIL
IVEAR-TO-OATEI
(fflVW 3 OTR 4 JOCT. 1. 19841 REVISED
PLND ACTL PLND fcCTL C PLND ACTL I PROJECTIONS
RF.MOVAL SUHHARV
STARTS
NPL
NON-NPL
rtlMPLFTUINS
nri.
1 N4GII INC
.
IIPL
tlf IN NPL
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
( «OOOB >
nmnr.NT YEAR FUNDS
nri SUES
m IH NPL INCIDENTS
CUMl INOENCY
cAnnvnvFR FUNDS
NPI. SITES
NUN-NPl. INCIDENTS
TOTAL FUNDS
PRP RFflPONSF.?}
nTART*)
NI'L
N11N NPL
CHI1PLETIONS
WM.
HI IN NPL
O
O
o
o
N/A
N/A
O
O
O
N/A
N/A
0
w/t
N>
&
o o o o
o o o o
o o o o
o o o o
N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A
'
O O O O
o o o ••" *o
O N/A O N/A O N/A O N/A
.«
N/A O N/A O N/A O N/A O
N/A O N/A O N/A O N/A O
O O 0 O
. ..A Kl^V »/A
N/k N/W . ' T '
H> l^/» |J/A W/A
M/A M/\ |yjA W/A
M> M/A »JA ilM
9
1
0
o
o
o
N/A
N/A
-~ — 7— —
,'-
1 N/A
N/A O
N/A 0
"A
fft
o
0
o
0
N/A
N/A
O
O
O
1
O
*>
•f*
f/A
-------
OSWER # 9840.0
3UAOTSSLY REMOVAL PLANS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS SUMMARY
ONGOING REMOVALS FOR REGION 00
AS OF 10/1/84
NPL PLNO ACTUAL PLWO ACTUAL PLANNED ACTUAL
SITE NAME ST FLO START START COMPL COMPLETE 08LICATN OBLICATN COMMENTS
OUARTERLY REMOVAL PLANS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS SUMMARY
PRP REMOVALS FOR QUARTER 1
FOR RCOION 10
NPL ACTU PLAN OOLLAB
BITE NAME 9T FUO STAR COMP VALUE COMMENTS
-------
QSNER f 9840.0
QUARTERLY REMOVAL PLANS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS SUMMARY
PUANN£O~9TAR*S-PflR QUARTER i
FOR REGION 00
WPL PLND ACTUAL PLNO ACTUAL PLANNED ACTUAL
SITE NAME ST FUO START START CO"PL COMPLETE OBLICATN OBLICATN
-------
OSWEP # 9840.0
SE^I?; A_ =L.ANS
DISCUSS! ON 0? REMEDiAL PROGRAM PLAN
T'ie p o.-p o se of t !-,e r erne 3 i a I . p rocram plan is TO iay OUT
t ne acrivities and schedule for remedial projects in FY 1986.
Appendix B i s a list of remedial actions That should be tne
Starting point for your planning. The following instructions
are to be used fully in filling out the forms on pages 44
and 45.
Descriptors on the Format
Many possible project descriptors are provided to clearly
identify the lead or project type, contractor undertaking The
project and support functions. The main objective of the
remedial format is to capture a 11 possible project costs, in-
cluding community relations, enforcement support, COE tecn-
nical assistance and any other identifiable pro ject- spec i f i c
costs. As the remedial format is-completed, utilize any
additional expenditure categories needed tc ful ly capture
project costs. Define any additional descriptors you may
create so they are- fully understood.
A I I owance s
The FY 1986 SCAP is the final approved plan. for FY 1986.
Allowances will be granted during the fisca1 year based on
the FY 1986 S'CAP and monies in the allowance are reserved for
those sites on the SCAP. Obi igations may not be made for
sites or activities which do not appear on the SCAP. Thus,
the plan must be amenaed or adjusted if obi igations are re-
quired for sites or activities, including monies to supple-
ment ongoing projects, which do not appear on the plan;
Procedures for adjusting or amending the plan appear below.
The final FY 1986 SCAP is used to construct the first
two quarters' advice of allowance. The amendea FY 1986 SCAP,
which will be prepared after the semi-annual review, will be
used to issue the third quarter allowance. The best approach
for handling fourth quarter allowances is still under consider-
ation, as projected obligations f or .t he f ourt h quarter are
a large share of the FY 1986 budget and ' sub stant i a I flexi-
bility in t he movement of moniesamong Regions will be
required during the fourth quarter to ensure proper fisca
ma nagement .
Adjusting or Amending the SCAP
Obi i gat i on s cannot be.^made for sites or activities which
do not appear on the SCAP. Two types of *nod i f i cat i on s are
required to keep the plan current during the fiscal year to
ensure that required fiscal year expenditures are formalized
on the SCAP.
-------
OSWER # 9840.0
'- ~ _ -j 5~ TI a -. - 5 : \ ? - • * ' C 2 ~ i 31 "" C ~ 9 3 3 C U 2 r t 5 r s '
-rJjs~Tir^~3 2 ~ 2 T.c-:!f!r2~'3ns to Tie ? i 2 ~ .-/-.ici ie;t ner
z'-'-sr - •"= 3 ; ..•'• 3 , 30, an: * A , Targets set forth in ~ ie
fi^2; •" Y :9Sc SCAP ncr exceeo tie Regional advise of allow-
ance. These couM be considered "minor" alterations suci as
t r,e snifT-ng of monies among si~es or activities es better
cost estimates are availaoie or supplementing ongoing projects
as need dictates. Adjustments do not require approval . Head-
quarters should be notified of adjustments monthly by the
Branch Chief, in conjunction with the Waste Management
Division Director1s monthly financial transactions, report
submission. A simple statement describing the change will be
sufficient to notify Headquarters of the change (e.g., add
SlOOK to Site A RI/FS, deduct SIOOK from Site 3 RI/FS; or,
deduct S100K from Site A RI/FS, add Site B to plan - sup-
plemental funding for ongoing RI/FS project J100K; or,
deduct S50K from SI budget, add $50K to PA budget).1 Sub-
stitution of RI/FS projects shown on the plan are al so
considered adjustments to the plan unless the project has
been taken over by a potential responsible party (see
discussion of PRP takeover below).
Amencments (Approval by Headquarters)
Because of personnel and financial resource consider-
ations and Strategic Planning and Management System commit-
ments, modifications of the SCAP which will i n c r e a se or
decrease the new start targets set forth in the FY 1986
SCAP or would exceed t he Reg ions quarterlyadvice of allow-.
ance, require approval by the AA-OSWER. A letter describing
the required modification and why the change is needed will
be sent to the AA-OSWER who wi-ll consider the change.
Substitution of SCAP Projects - PRP Takeover
""^"^^™^^^""!^*" """"™"™"™*™^i^• """"^"^"""""
The FY '986 remedial portion of the SCAP will oe aMowed
to exceed the current remedial budget in anticipation that
some remedial RI/FS and RD/RA projects currently funded on
tne SCAP will be undertaken by responsible parties. Planning
efforts must be sustained for all future Fund Design/Construct
actions, unless satisfactory agreement on future actions has
been reached with responsible parties. Funding for RI/FS,
RD/RA projects which are removed from the plan because of PRP
assumption will revert to Headquarters to further reconcile
the SCAP with budget during the fiscal year.
if a State assumes re sporfsi bi I i ty for fe,wer PAs and/or Sis
than a Region has planned, the FIT must pick up the balance
Regions should be sure to adjust their FIT Accomplishments
Schedules to account for the added workload and notify
Headquarters of the change in the Branch Chief's monthly
reporT.
-------
OSWER # 9840.0
He50CJ2r"-5."s Contingency Fund
A portion o* the funding provided in the FY 1936 remedial
budget * i i ! oe set aside to *om a Headquarters Contingency
Fund - 2r fsur-n quarter ma nagerie n- of 30, and RA prefects.
The Contingency Fund will be set asioe during the mio-ysar
review from the third and fourth quarter regional allowances.
This fund will be used both as a buffer for such events as
RA cost increases due to differences between government
cost estimates and actual bids, and cost increases during
construction due to changed field conditions or discovery
of more extensive contamination, and as a means for ensuring
full utilization of FY 1996 Remedial Funds.
During the fiscal year, it is essential that each
Region no+ only operate within its approved plan but al so
apply sound fiscal management procedures to red uce proj ect
co st growt h. Unanticipated cost increases in any Region
could affect the SCAP for other Regions. Eac h Reg i on mu st
attempt to resolve internally any funding problems within
the Regional allowance before requesting additional funds
from the Contingency fund.
The Semi-Annual and Third Quarter Review
Two reviews are anticipated during the fiscal year.
The serr \ -a nnua I review will be held toward the end of the
second quarter, at which time the SCAP will be amended and
a thiro quarter advice of allowance will be developed.
Anot.her review will be held toward the end of the third
quarter to ensure coord ination and year-end fiscal manage-
ment.
Region,.I Contingency Fund
RI/F3 project costs -can vary due to changed conditions
or the need for additional work by the contractor. Therefore,
Regions are encouraged to develop a contingency fund for Rl/FS
budgets. Contingency amounts should range from 5-10 percent
of the individual site Rl/FS oudget, depending on the expecteo
complexity of the project. The contingency amount shall be
carried as a line item in the plan, as shown on the remedial
format.
Community Relations
To support the Community Relations planning effort, up
to $6,000 is available in contract support for each site
scheduled for Rl/FS funding*" in FY 1985. Jn addition, other
sites not targeted for Rl/FS action in FY .1985 may need
community relations planning monies and should be submitted
along with other requests.
-------
OSWER f 9840.0
a c t i ,/ i ~ i 2 s
evaiiao'e in cor-~r.»c~ soppo-~ *or acTlvi-ies sue n as ''scoping
•neeTings", - zz~ sneers, responsiveness summaries, pub' ic
->cr;::es, 3->2 ree-'n: 'ogistits. Requests over S'5,0'00 ior
Community Re:ar'on s projects w i > ; ae handled on a case-sy-case
basis. Regions may undertake community relations activities
without the use of contractor support.
Forward Planning Activities
The goals/objectives for forward planning activities are:
(I) development of technical/financia I information to support
"equests fo-- funcs for subsequen* remedial planning or
remedial action activities; (2) evaluation of the extent
and utility of available data and identification of additional
data needs; (3) identification of administrative or pro-
cedural problems that may affect project implementation;
and (•*) Federal-lead workpl an devel opment.
Forward planning may be performed at sites with RI/FS
projects on the Fr 1936 SCAP. Sites without an existing
RAMP and with an RI/FS scheduled to start after FY 1986 are
also eligible. For State-lead sites, this may consist of
preparing a Statement of Work and request for proposal s or
other related activities (note that this may ultimately be
implemented .with the mul.ti-sMte cooperative agreement).
For Federal-lead si-tes, this may consist of activities
leading up to and including work plan preparation required
by the REM contracts, under already established procedures.
Forward planning activities generally will be limited
to sites on either the proposed or final NPL. In rare
circumstances, forward planning may be allowed at candidate
NPL si-1-es.
Corps of Engineers Design and Technical Assistance
Task assignments should be issued to the COE to expedite
their involvement during the RI/FS and RD phases of Federal-
i ead projects. Generally, a $10,0.00 technical assistance
assignment should be initiated during RI/FS and a $7,000
design assistance assignment should be initiated as tne
draft RI/FS is made public.
Multi-Site Cooperative Agreements
States may choose to include in MSCA applications one
or more pre-NPL, remedial , ^r enforcement remedial invest-
i gat i on/f ea si b i I i ty study activities at orfe or more sites.
This approach will enable States to negotiate a variety of
agreements ranging from one type of response activity at
one or more sites, to including all fundable activiti.es at
-------
T 2 - O ;j S 3 ' ~ •= 3
etel
OSWER ft 9840.0
v ' ~ * : •» 3 ; ~-2* 2 . ^2^80 ' 2 • 2 "C 3 '. '. - W a D !. 6
! / ' ~ ' 3 s r c r 3 n •/ 5 : ~ s , * : r « n i c i rne^e is 3
'•"anacer.s nr
a n 'SMP/, 'nay se inc! uaed-in an
The scope of activities whiz* may &s oefformed under a
cooperative agreement include preliminary assessments, site
inspections ana other pre-NPl activities; forward planning;
State-lead RI/FS/RD/RA/O&M; management assistance during
Federal-lead RI/FS/RO/RA (including other Federal agency
RI/FS/RD); State enforcement-lead RI/FS; and oversight of
PRP RI/FS/RD. The Region should specifically identify which
sites/activities will oe funded under a MSCA vehicle.
CERCLA Supplemental for 3012 Program
In the latter part of FY 1984, CERCLA monies were first
made available for supplementing the 3012 program. In FY
1935, approximately $6 million in additional CERCLA monies
will be made available.
The Region should identify any FY 1935 needs in the remedial
format.
Remedial Contractor Workload
Based on I eve I-of-effort projections to complete.the
Federal-lead projects assigned through FY 1985, remedial '
resources under the two R-EM/FlT co.ntracts wil! be fully
committed. Activities during FY 1986 should be limited
to completing ongoing work assignments. Exceptions to
this are noted below. Every effort must be made to complete
all ongoing projects by the contract termination date of
September 30, 1986.
Federal-lead RI/F5 and support projects scheduleo tor
FY 1986 should be distributed between the Camp, Dresser, and
McKee (COM) contract (REM II) and the two new contracts
(Zone 1, Regions 1-4; Zone 2, Regions 5-10) to be awarded
auring FY 1985. We expect the new contracts to be operational
during the 1st Quarter of FY 1986. Based on this schedule,
FY 1986 workload should be distributed as follows.
• At least 50J of all new RI/FS projects (both Program
and Enforcement) should be assigned to the COM REM I I
contract.
o The remaining new RI/FS projects should be targeted for
the respective new contractor. First quarter assignments
should be limited to one or two projects, with the re-
mainder coming in subsequent quarters.
« Assignments to the existing REM/FIT contracts should
be limited to the following:
-------
OSWER # 9840.0
"-3 *yndi*.: f o~ on-cc'nc ^r^'ec^s TO ccve'"^^
S 3 j ^m
scope ^a-es. ^
,n.-/ Relations imp!ementation *or ongoing
Sma • : second operaoie un;^ projects a^ si'as
where REM/FiT performed the original work.
These orojects must be started during the first
quarrer, and completed no later than September
I 986.
Minor forward planning, community relations, or
oversight projects in support of State-lead
sites which can be completed by September 1986.
v
o Support project.s tor fo~*a^d D :. a-siinc ( pa-t i cu ' a r t
Federal-lead sites), community relations, and State ana
PRP oversight should be distributed between COM and the
new contractor consistent with RI/FS assignments and
overaI I workload.
• RD projects in support of State-lead RA's or for small
Federal-lead remedial actions can be assigned either
to COM or the new contractor. (For the Fe-dera! -1 ead
projects the Corps of Engineers will direct and oversee
the design work and carry the project through the RA
p ha se .
9 Project assignments for COM s-hould be screened for pote
ti conflict-of-interest problems through' the COM
Reg-ionai coordinator. A similar screening will be requi
for projects to be assigned to the new contractors one©
the selections-are announced.
« Sm-!! IRM's (not assigned to the Corps) should be assigned
teethe COM contract. (Small IRM's for sites where NUS or
CH2M Hill prepared the the focused FS can be assigned to
The same contractor provided the work can oe compleTec no
Iater than 9/30/36.)
HSCO also wii! be competing a smaller remedial planning
support contract among small, disadvantaged businesses. Our
arget is to perform 5-8 Federal-lead RI/FS projects per year
under this contract. We expect, to award this contract during
FY 1986, and we will be working with the Regions to identify
two or three candidate sites to assign to this contractor.
Additional Projects
There is a need for a reserve of additional projects to
substitute projects whicK*ere taken over by RP's or delayed.
Although additional RI/FS starts may be Identified, listing
additional projects is especially importa-nt for RO and RA
activities. These projects should be listed in the space
provided on the remedial format. For new starts, projects
should be listed in priority order determined by the site
management plans.
-------
:••:=. 94
• INDICATES *IRST FUNDING AT SITE »OR STATED ACTIVITY
OSKER # 9840.0
SITE
e
A
HORCSTAME MINING
MIDLAND WHJDUCTS
ST 0 ACTHUTY
1ULTT-
SZT :ON-
PUNDINC THAC-
TY VEHICLE TOR
OLD INCER OIL
PREHITT REFINERY
SIHES DISPOSAL PIT
SOUTH VAU-EY
TAB CREEK/OTTAWA
TRIANGLE CHEMICAL
UNITES CREOSOTINO
UNITED NUCLEAR
VTRTAC
- LA -
• NH -
• NH - 9 SITES
- OK - 19 SITES
- OK - 1* SITES
* T» - S3 SITES
~ TX - 99 SITES TX S
-*eeiOMM. CONTINGENCY
•REGION O* TOTAL* • 369H8OO. OO
SI
QUARTER Iff
OBLICATIC*
12. OpO
/ °
x^y°°s
c
110. 000
OUAftTER II 9UARTER III OUAflTER IV
OBLIGATION OBLIGATION OBLIGATION «^
nnc.
0
^^^ 0
6.000
0
^.^ 0
so. ooo
6.000
0
169. OOO
0
0
0
430.000
0
0
O
12. 000
770. 000
0
0
0
O
6.000
9OO. OOO
18. 000
0
O
O
0
0
O.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SO. 000
4. 900. 000
0
0
0
0
0
1. 900.000
0
o
0
0
0
*o. ooo
0
0
4O. OOO
0
o
0
9. 4OO
0
32.400
13*. 479 *
19. OOO
•a. 400
27. OOO
270.098
o
.-**•
0
S*. 000
0
o
o
109. OOO
12.000
to. ooo
o
o
o
o
0
0
0
0
99.4OO
999.684 f
84'. OOO
0
100.000
0
0
0
0
0
84*400
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.300.000
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
o
o
0
0
0
0
o
o
o
4.439.916
9. 941,
3*3. we i*. S7&. OOO
-------
OSWER # 9840.0
=ROGR.->,-. TARGET PROJECTS: RESIGN
*First Activity Obligation
Site Name State
Bu sted 8 i m
-orri ole L/F
Miaana Marsh
New Found Sound
Eyesore
Contriver si al
Gross
Nasty'
No Probi em Haul ing
Deadl y Dust
Ma & Pa Env. Services
LO
LO
LO
NS
PE
PE
PE
PE
PE
SN
SN
(FAO)
Lead Activity
S
S
s
s
F
S .
S
S
S
c
F
S
RI/FS*
Rl/FS
RD*
RI/FS
RD*
RA*
RI/FS*
' RI/FS*
Rl/FS*
Rl/FS*
RI/FS*
RA
RD
RA*
RI/FS
Mul ti-
Site (SK)
Funding .Probable Quarter
Vehicle 1 2 3
MSCA X
MSCA 1 50
MSCA
MSCA 125
MSCA X
MSCA
X
MSCA X
MSCA X
MSCA X
MSCA X
1.000 •
40
X
210
FILLING OUT THE FORM
Sites on the FY 1987 portion of the SCAP are arrangeo alphabetically by
State. "New" sites are designated by an asterisk in the activity category.
The quarter in which the obligation for "New" site activity (first activity
obligation) i s most likely to occur is shown by placing an X beneath the proper
quarterly columns 1-4. "New" sites are designated by an asterisk. Incremental
funding for on-going remedial actions, including second operable units (see
definition of operable un'ut page 41), are shown on the plan in the proper .
quarter as an estimated dollar amount.
-------
OSKER ft 9840.0
j Nl£T?:'JC" i.ONS -1s- COMPLETING Tr.£ gv '5S" PROJECT LIST
Tnis yea.- as par* of r-,e SCAP we are asking tna~ you
provide a preliminary ; ; ST • n g of your anticipated =Y '.967
projects. Xe bei isve t-ni s i s an important part of your
curren- planning process. in putting together the FY '.986
SCAP, you need to be tninking about the outyear workload
requirements. You al so need to coordinate with your States
to ensure that each of the projects will oe ready to start
(or move on to the next phase) as scheduled. If you have
a good site management planning process, the preparation
of FY 1987 project list will be relatively simple.
For new starts, t ne plan is focusing discussions towe^o
WHICH S IT£S will be I i kely cand idates for the f i seal year .
Although cost is an important consideration in the selection
of new activity starts for the fiscal year, it is recognized
that cost estimates will be uncertain, as many CY 1987
candidates may presently be in the early RI/FS stage. Accord-
ingly, no dollar values need be assigned to the activity
for first activity obligations. Cost estimates will oe
developed for new "starts on the FY 1987 Plan as the FY 1987
fiscal year draws closer. Incremental funding neeos (includin
second operable units) should be sho*n on the plan as estimate:
d oi Iar amount s.
RI/FS candidate sites which meet the tentative FY 1987
target shown on p. 13 should be selected in collaboration
with the States. These sites are prel iminary selections
and may change because of site conditions or otner site-relate
situations which may ari se over the next two years.
Projects where planning activities (RI/FS, RO'V are
presen^Iy on-going or which will be started during FY 1985
will comprise the majority of candidate sites for RD or RA
in FY 1987.. To develop the SY 1987 SCAP, pipeline projecr
completion dates for planning activities (RI/FS, RD) shouio
be examined and evaluated for accuracy. These completion
estimates will be critical to making.-! n formed choices for
the fiscal year. Be sure to include the time required to
move the activity through established management systems,
including the Record of Decision and competitive procurement
of contractors by the State and Army Corps of Engineers.
A list of potential candidate sites is provided for
your use as Appendix B. This list has been constructed
using projected completion dates for remedial planning
activities currently underway and standard timel ines for
the start and completion c** remedial activities. This list
should be viewed as an effort to comprehensively list projects
which have been started in your region and are potentially
eligible for further remedial activity. These lists should
be altered as necessary to properly represent your best FY
1987 Plan.
-------
OSWER § 9840-0
SITE/STATE
Skunk
Skunk
Skunk
Skunk
Skur^k
S<:J".*
Hoi
Hoi
Hoi
Hoi
Hoi
Hol
OW,
OW,
OW,
OW,
OW,
OW,
NZ
NZ
NZ
NZ
NZ
NZ
TYPE
RI/FS
RI/FS
RD
RD
RA
RA
^
^
A
D
-Y -.966
QUARTER
COMPLETE
1234
Fv 195"
QUARTER
COMPLETE
1234
• : SCAL
OUT- YEAR
COMPLETE
38 89 90
F
F
F
p
r
COMMENT
Drum 0' spcsai
SI urry Vsal !
Drum Di spos
Slurry Wai I
Drum Di sposc
Si i.--,- we! '
Instructions
To nore accurately assess annual resource needs and for workload analysis
and workyear distribution, information about remedial project status must be
provided for all ongoing RI/FS, including RI/FS under aoministrative consent
order, and ongoing RD and RA projects whether Federal or RP financed. Provide
the above-! i sted information for al I sites where monies were obi igated through FY
1984, where obligations are expected during FY 1985, and where RP oversight is
expected to be needed during FY 1986. List the expected quarter and fiscal year
for the completion of the activity, or out-year when the activity will be completec
As shown in-the example, remedial actions at sites are often separated into
operable units .which'may require separate feasibility studies, RODs, designs, and
remedial actions, if mul itiple operable unrts are required at the site, I i st th©
completion of each operable unit separately and provioe a several word description
of the action type in the comment field.
Def i nit ions
1. "Complete" ^or activity types:
RI/FS
RD
RA
'The quarter in *hich tne Draft ROD wi'i be senr to Headquarters or
forwarded to the Regional Admin i sTrator for Decision, if delegated.
For Federal-I ead , contract for itnpl ementation is advertised for bids.
For State-lead, design and specifications approved by EPA.
The operable unit is being monitored or operated to ascertain the
performance of the operable unit. If the operable unit i s the last
operable unit, the entire remedial action is in performance monitoring
prior to instituting deletion procedures. (In essence, the .date of
final acceptance and beneficial occupancy.)
For oversight of
RP RA.
RP actions, as activity types, use RP RI/FS, RP RD, and
-------
OSWER # 9840.0
OSWER # 9840.0
A comporan* or a cosT-effacr I ve remedial '"esponse t:iat TV itsei* el'imi na'-ss
or iiitigaTes a -s'aase or "hrea^.of rsiease and neeas no addi^iona! action
to perform l"s f unction. Examples Include: Off- site Transfer anc aisposa'
of drums; draining surface impoundments; construction of crainage controls;
installation of slurry walls (and/or clay caps); provision of alternative
water supplies; construction and operation of groundwater treatment systems.
An operable unit would not include: fencing or other site security; repacking
of drums on-site without further actions to treat or dispose of the waste;
or installation of a cap and/or barrier wall that require groundwater
treatment to be effective.
-------
OSWER # 9840.0
OF ACCCM=.:SHME\I- SCHEDULE: rr 1965
Act!v i ty
'y Schedule of Projected Activities
FIT Hours & Subcontracting S
FY 1986 Reporting Quarter
1 2 3 4
Tota
Remedi a I
I nve st i ga t i on
Prel i mi nary
Assessment s
Site
In spect i on s
NPL Support
-MRS Scoring
-Qua I i ty Cfv- cki ng
-Resp to Comments
F e d era! Facilities
-S i te In spr t i on
-HRS Scoring/OC
*
Pi ox i n Strategy
-Fi eld Work
Enforcement
Support
-Field Work
-Cleanup oversight
-Legal Records mgt
Other (i dent i fy)
TotaI Requi red
FIT Hour s
(Subcontract $)
-------
OSWER * 9840.0
- =
FY 1986 Reporting Quarter
Total
Enforcemenr-
Remedia I
I n ve st i ga~ i on
PreI i mi na ry
Assessment s
S.ite
i n spect i on s
NPL Support
-HRS Scori ng
-Qua I i ty Check i ng
-Resp to Comments
Federal Facilities
-Si te In specti on
-HRS Scori «g/QC
Pi oxi n Strategy
-Fi eld Work
-Field Work
-Cleanup oversight
-Legal Record s mgt
Other (identify)
Total Required
Ft T Hour s
(Subcontract $)
-------
page 44 - addition
'Oavuc*n." IT
Definitions
SITE INSPECTION FOLLOW-UPS (SIF)
The purpose of site inspection follow-ups (SIF) is to
collect additional data at a site that is necessary to
substantiate or strengthen an existing HRS score. It is
considered a second phase of a SI and is conducted inde-
pendently of the initial SI. If the site is listed on the
NFL, this more detailed information will be collected
during the remedial investigation.
In developing the workplan and identifying sites for
SIF funding, the Recior* should carefully evaluate if it
would be easier, more cost effective and faster to task
the EPA FIT to conduct SIFs. The FIT is fully equipped
and has subcontracting capabilities to support most of the
technological and funding needs to conduct a SIF. Use of
the FIT would allow the State to focus on PAs and Sis.
MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE (MA)
Funding for management assistance (MA), formerly reserved
for remedial activities, is now available for Regionally per°
formed PAs, Sis, and HRS scores. The purpose of MA-is to
provide the State with the opportunity to review EPA-lead PA,
SI, and HRS scores. MA contributes additional information
that may change the disposition or score of a site and also
may help to maintain the cooperative nature of the PA/SI
program.
-------
OSWER ft 9840.0
- 44 -
DISCUSSION OF FIT ACCOMPLISHMENT SCHEDULE
The FIT Schedule is designed to obtain information on
the use of the FIT resources in achieving the overalI Regional
Superfund goals. Regionsmust submit the Accomplishments
Schedule as a planning tool to promote effective management
of the FIT. This planning schedule should be updated at the
end of each quarter and provided to Headquarters. This will
assist Headquarters and the Regions TO evaluate shifts in
FIT use that could affect SCAP output requirements. Head-
quarters will be monitoring each Region's quarterly usa^e of
the FIT through reports from the contractors.
Definitions
Prel iminary Assessment (PA)
A preliminary assessment (PA) is the off-site review of
available information about a site for the purpose of deter-
mining if futher action, such as site inspection, or no
further action is needed*. A PA i s completed when it is
approved by a responsible EPA Region official. The SCAP
general Iy establ i shes that targeted PAs are performed under
under the 3012 program. The Region may complete more PAs,
provided Rl and SI targets are satisfied, but this effort
must be closely coordinated with work performed by the
States under 3012 or CERClA cooperative agreements.
Site I n sp e c t i o n ( S I )
The site inspection (SI) builds upon the information
gathered during the PA and includes on-site collecting and
developing data from the field. For purposes of FIT planning
or reporting, the SI is completed when it is approved by a
responsible EPA Region official. On-site or off-site work
at a site already included on the NPL does not qualify as a
Site Inspection. For those sites not on the NPL but where
follow up work is carried out, the inspection is an addendum
to the original SI and does not qualify as an additional SI
for CERCLIS. A site visit without sample collection can
qualify as an SI if it is determined that sufficient analytical
data are available to serve as the basis for HRS scoring.
The SCAP will establish a minimum number of Sis to be
completed. Regions may elect to conduct more than the targeted
number provided other targets for Rl and PA are met.
Remedial Investigations
The majority of FIT RIs will continue to be in support of
Enforcement. Headquarters enforcement will be working with the
Regions to determine which RIs will be conducted by FIT and will
project a total of estimated cost for FIT work, including subcontracting
-------
OSWER 3 S840.0
•' 5 - - c-r terve -.7 tscn-T-c3' s-cso"* ?or 7 he se si*es, c*-er> T na n .
f e a s; 3 ; ! ! T y st j c i 2 s, m u 3~ ;• s T c '. j a e G <• * t n i r T r>e V; *» o r * p ! a n .
S:- *s SD«C;^'C workpians *o-- some of * he Ris have a'rsacy been
c DIRS i etec . ' ~ ne co st oud ga* 5 9-3^3 o ; i shed i n ~ ^e ^or -ecj;9 *c ceTsrmir-.e ~!T COSTS.
'scera! Faci'ities Susro^t
FIT may be involved in a variety of activities related to
Federal agencies. This might include special site inspection,
HRS scoring, and remedial oversight.
Hazard RanKing System/NPL Support
FIT involvement in HRS will vary throughout the year depending
on schedules determined by the NPL program. FIT may be requested
to score sites, quality check sites scored by States and Regions
and assist in the response to comments on sites proposed to be
added to the NPL. These potential F.IT activities should be
estimated based on discussions with the appropriate Regional NPL
per sonne! .
I mp I ementat i OP. 'of Dicxin Strategy
FIT activities on dioxin strategy projects-wi1 I vary from
Region to Region. Some Regions have already begun to task FIT
for collection of samples in Tier 1 and 2 studies and/or used
FIT subcontracting resources to obtain support for such projects.
FIT efforts on these tasks should be scheduled based on Regional
estimates of dioxin activities. Note that any dioxin work
initiated or performed by the FIT must be reported in
category oo the Monthly Report and must not appear in
more generic category. The actual tier level of work
a I so be i nd i cated .
the dioxin
a S I or
should
TES can now be used to support sample collection. Request
this support should be handled as for other TES requests.
s completion of dioxin
for
The SCAP tracks the initiation as well; a
activities as indicated on the tracking forms.
Enforcement Support
Enforcement offices rely on FIT to provide technical support
for enforcement cases. This includes field activities, oversight
activities, legal records mana.genrent, and othe^case support
act i v i t i e s.
-------
QSWER # 9840.0
F ;'T ' s 2 z ' ' '• ty TO ; -r ~ • o r m a w > j e variety of ~ec nr. i ca ! f u P. c ~ : c;
has Tiace •- a very popgi=r -esource. Each Region na s special
pro^ec's «.-!icn -nay requi-e r:T assistance, parricuiar'y enfo'ceme'
support acTiviriss. Scheauling of these will be based on each
Region's needs. Note that while the Regions can use FIT resource
to assist ;n any p'=i-!-ig activities for sites, REM resources are
also available for this type of support.
-------
OSWER £ 9840.0
i e e
nr Reporr:nc
I. PRP RESPONSE/REIMBURSEMENT ACTIONS INITIATED THIS QUARTER1
A. Site/State2
9. Settlement Document^
C . -. -j s 2 c- r! s £- •' ? 6 • ~ r. L: r s e " % n t A c ~ ! v ; * v
Do $ Value of Response
Eo $ Reimbursement to Superfund; Status
F. Compl iance Status^
II. ONGOING PRP RESPONSE ACTIONS REQUIRING OVERSIGHT^
A. Site/State2
B. Settlement Document^
C. Response Activity^
D. Compl iance Status^
E. Method and Frequency of Compliance Method Efforts
III. PRP RESPONSE/REIMBURSEMENT ACTIONS COMPLETED THIS QUARTER1
A ." 'S: e/State2
B. Settlement Document^
C. Response Activity4
D. $ Value of Response
E. $ Reimbursement to Superfund; Status
IV. JUDIC.AL ACTIONS COMPLETED THIS QUARTER'1
x
A. Site/State2
3. Type of Action ($106/5107)
C. Nature of Judgment6
V. ACTIVE FILED OR DOJ REFERRED JUDICIAL ACTIONS1
A. Site/State2
B . RCRA/CERCLA Claims
C. Status7
VI. ONGOING RI/FS AT FEDERAL OR STATE ENFORCEMENT-LEAD SITES1
A. Site/State2 ^
B. Status/Completion Date »
VII. NEGOTIATIONS COMPLETED THIS QUARTER
1
A. Site/State2
B. Response/Reimbursement Activity4
C. Outcome
-------
OSKER * 9840.0
^-:5TiCS : T-. 5 QUAR"^; CUMULATIVE)
NPL Nor.-NPL NPL Non-NP
thi s OTR -hi s GTS -o Dare TO Sa~
Not C! a ssi f i ed
Fund Lead
Fund Lead - Negotiate
£ nf orc.eme nt-Lead
State-Lead
IX. DiOXIN ACTIONS COMPLETED THIS QUARTER1
A. Response Actions - Tiers la, Ma
1 . Si-a/State
2. Statu s
3. Response Actions - Tiers II! - VII
1. Si te/State
2. Status
X. FEDERAL FACILITY ACTIONS THIS QUARTER1
A. Number of Federal Facility Sites on NPL (Report Annually)
B Rl/FS initiated at Federal Facility Sites
1 . Si te/State1
2. Status
s
C. Administrative Actions Initiated at Federal Facility Sites
1 . Site/State2
2 . Statu s
D. Federal Facility Response Actions Completed
1 . Site/State2
2. Status
E. Federal Facility Sites Referred to HQ/OFA
1. Site/State2 ^
2. Status »
-------
OSWER * 9840.0
'. A separate rgDort should be prepared for eacn si*e.
2. Indicate wnetner site is on NPL or is unlisted.
3. Settlement document types are consent decree s,. admi-n i strat i ve
orders on consent, unilateral administrative orders, and
judicial orders.
4. Ca tec sr i e 5. of response activities include removal, RI/FS,
RD, RA, ana reimoursemenr (cost recovery).
5. Provide status of cornel iance with the settlement document,
i.e., in compliance, out of compliance, compliance status
uncertain, ana the anticipated completion date for response
action/reimbursement.
6. Indicate nature of court decision; relief obtained including
nature of injunctive relief granted and/or cost recovery
j udgment.
7.' Indicate whether case is filed or referred to OOJ, and filing
or I i t i gat i on sc he d uIe .
-------
OSWER # 9840.0
IT 2 d 3 i T i c n - c The 2 c * '• v ! T i e s * h i c ~i are piannsa unoer the SCAP
several otr^er e n f or ceme i* ac"ivi"!es will fee repcrtec as pa'* :> •
T ne 5C.V? process on a quarter! y Da sis. These activities a re
described below. Consideration will be given TO direct reporting
of These activities into OSWER management information systems in
the future. Forms are provided separately in this document for
reporting this enforcement information.
I . °RP Response/Reimbursement Initiated This Quarter
Under tnis category Regions w 1 : I reporr p - i v a - e p e - 1 y re s? c • ? •
actions (o.r reimbursement to the HSRTF) obtained during t ne repcr~
quarter through either Consent Decrees, Consent AOs, unilateral AOs,
or judicial orders with whicn there is compliance. For each,
information snould be provided on the "Activity" undertaken
(Ri/FS, removal, remedial), the esTimated cost of the response
action being undertaken and the amount of money being reimbursed
to the HSRTF . InformaTion on reimbursement to the HSRTF should
include status (i.e., received or date due).
In addition, information is to be provided on unilateral
orders issued during the reporting quarter where respondents
either did not comply or where compliance status is uncertain.
The status column should reflect such events as initiation o*
fund *inanced response, initiation. of $106 judicial actions to
enforce the order or other information as appropriate.
»
I I . Ongoing PRP Response Requiring Oversight
This category is a measure of the workload, the Region will
carry over 'i nto t-he next quarter to oversee private party response
actions. These actions should be initiated either during or
previous to the reporting quarter and not completed. Therefore,
they will require continued oversight activities. Regions should
report response actions being undertaken pursuant to settlements
(con sent decrees or. A-.O.s on consenT) ana unilateral admin i st rat i ve
orders. The "Status" column should briefly reflect the status of
compliance and progress towards completion of the response actions,
including the anticipated date of completion of the response
actions. Regions should al so report the method used to monitor
status of compl iance and how often compl iance i s monitored.
III. PRP Re spon se/Rei mbur sement,. Compl eted This Quarter
i
Under this category, Regions will report cleanups actually
completed during the reporting quarter which will consequently
require no further oversight. As above, information should be
provided for response actions being undertaken pursuant to both
settlements or unilateral admin istrative orders. This MST should
-------
OSWLR £ 9840.0
•=scs."!se 2c~'c"'3 : "i: -'• 3~ec b J P^Fs -'u'ino tie
•q j3 r- 5.- * ~ i c n *e ~e a '. so ccmp-etec. ! i 2C d i t i c n , t ne ca *a s ncu i
inc'-jde i n f ortia r ; on on re i mbur semen- to t ne HSRTr.
iV. guc;c;3s Actions Ccmoietea
This category includes information concerning Judgments
obtained in Federal District Courts, Bankruptcy Courts, and
Magistrates concern!ng claims filed under CERCLA ana RCRA for
Superfund sites. Details concerning the nature and the judicial
action and court judgment (injunctive relief, Superfund cost
- r. co ve --y } obtained should be pr'oviaed.
V . Active Filed or Referred Judicial Actions
This category is a measure of the workload the Region will
carry over into the .next quarter related to already referred and
filed "active" cases. Active cases are defined forthis purpose
to exclude any case which has been settled as to all claims raised
in the complaint (even if oversight of that settlement is ongoing),
and any case which has been withdrawn or dismissed. Settlea
cases may in some instances be considered active if disputes
arise in the settlement which will be litigated, and therefore
require litigation support.
V I . Ongoing R I /FS at FederaI Or Ste*e Enforcement Lead Sites
•
This category is a measure of the workload the Region will
carry over into the next quarter to oversee Federal enforcement
managed Rl/FS projects. The list should include all such Ri/FS
being undertaken by the federal contractor which were initiated
during or p/r i or to the reporting quarter and which have not yet
been comoleted. The status and schedule for workplan completion
and anticipated completion date for each project should be no'ec.
VII. Negotiations Completed This Quarter
The Annual Plan tracks only negotiations to be initiated for
response activities. This category will show which negotiations
were completed during the reported quarter, whether they were
initiated during the reporting quarter or some previous quarter.
Regions should note the "Activity" being negotiated (removal RI/FS,
RD/RA, reimbursement) and the outcome of the negotiations (Succes-
sful/Settlement; Unsuccessful/Federal Iy Financed Response Initiatec
Unsuccessful /Judicia I or Admihfstrative Actiop Initiated).
VIM. Site Classification
Under this category, Regions will report information on how
NPL sites are classified under the Site Classification System.
-------
OSWER * 9840.0
;^f;»-T5~i;--' -v : ' -~ ~r.»S3."»*.30 On "~ "*6 ^> UTC OS <~ O * S ' ~~.3 S i"1 "3 3 C •"!
category io." ~ 10 se si~es class', fiac our IT 9 r ;ie repcrrinc ->eriDC
(genera!;/ s:~es for which responsible p 2 r * y se arc he 5 * e r e
completes) anc on r MS cumulative lumber of NPL siTes in each
category. ; n 3 c o i " 1 o n , Regions snculd a^^acM an up^atea Ms* or
the classification for eacn NPL site in their Region.
I X . Dioxin Activity Completions
Under this category. Regions will report sites where dioxin
-•-- spo" «•? ?c~'--s have been completed during the repof^ing quarter.
T ne S C AP" t r a c K s' T ne q u a r 7 e r of i r, i T , a - o n c - " ~ e = e = c - ' v : - i ~ -
and completion of PRP searches and information gathering acrivsTits
X . Federal Faci I ity Actions
In FY 1986, actions will be tracked involving federal facility
sites on the NPL. This reporting category requests information
concerning federal facility sites on the NPL (annual report); Ri./FS
initiated at federal facility sites; administrative actions
initiated at federal facility sites; community relations activities
initiated at sites; response actions completed at federal facility
sites; and, federal facility sites that have been referred for
action pursuant to any appropriate executive order to- Headquarter1 s
Office of Federal Activities.
-------
OSKSR # 9840.0
For *^e CL? only, proviae ouarrer iy projections of samples py "vps
of analysis.
Quarter
(Number of Samples)
Tyse of Analysi s
Organics
1 norgan i cs
Dioxin (CERCLA)
Special Analytical
Services (SA'£-.
TOTAL
Ql
$2
Q3
04
TOTAL
-------
Please complete the chart below tor annual analytical support services projections by Activity and by
laboratory resource.
f-'Y 1986 Analytical Support Sor vices Projections
Activity
Preliminary Assessment
Site Inspections
(Included field invest.)
RI/FS - New Start (NS)
Underway (U)
Remedial Design - NS
T
- U
Remedial Action - NS
- U
NPL Deletion
«b
0 4 M
Removal
RCRA Site Inspections
Other*
TOTAL
Reg I ona 1
Target
Avg. Samples
Per Sifte
Federal lead Sites
CLP
HSO Lah
•
RCM/FIT Lab
Other"
St^le Lead Sites
CLP
Statfe Labs
01 hoi *
Please specify other activities and other labs.
.;,!.:, total annual samples antictpal'id tor each
9
VO
CD
o
o
in the Hoyion.
-------
OSWER # 9840.0
APPENDIX A
FY 1986 ENF-ORCEMENT PROGRAM PLAN
-------
OSWER # 9840.0
oii'E. LL.-vdsS
a: Rr-'VAL ORDERS
ANNUAL
SITE/ STATE
FY B6 QUARTEr
NFL TYPE ', I \ I
-------
OSNER * 9840.0
&NrtjF:CEi"lEMT P:I = 5 OBLIGATED: PF-.P
ANNUAL TARGET:
• . FY 86 QUARTER
SITE/STATE N=L
-------
QSKER * 9840.0
rV 36
MP1- TYPE : 1
FOP: Pt Cvarir. FARl'V fitijPUNSE: ft I /F3
ANNUAL TARGET:
FY 96 QUARTER
»
SITE/STATE NPL TYPE ! 1 I' 2
-------
OSWER *
-•• 3e DU
'PE 1.
NKGQTIAT KDNS F'OK PRiWHTE PwRT^ RESPONSE: C/R
0
ANNUAL TARGET:
rV £6 QUARTE?
SITE/STATE NPL TYPE ! 1 ! I
-------
Nr'L
^DI-U-JI aT^^T I1. E ENKQRCEMEN V AC" IONS-rvE!1EDI^_
ANWUAL TARGET:
PY S6 CUAK'TE'R
SITE/STATE NF'L TYPE ! 1 ! -
-------
OSWER # 9840.0
AUMIh4I=TP:AnvE ENFORCEMENT ACT IONS-3300itj uP.DEn3
ANNUAL TARGET:
FV 86 QUARTER
S I "Ei' 3 TATE NP!_ TVF E
-------
OSWER £ 9840.0
£Nr-jP.Ce--IE*'" '"-C" I j IS : r.D.- -.-".
F« 56
NPL rvrE ; i
JUDICIAL ENFORCEMENT nCTIONS:TRQ,PI.PENALTIE5
ANNUAL TARGET:
FY 36 QUARTER
TYPE : 1 ! 2
-------
-. - o
OSWER # 9840.0
s-V 36 C-'JAF.TE*
?L .TYPE' : ' 1 ! -
•_:JS r ftECCVE?.'- CHEClKLISTi: REMEDIAL
ANNUAL TARGET:
FY 86 QUARTEr:
SITE/STATE . NPL TYPE 11 ! 2
-------
OSWER # 9840.0
Cu5T RECOVERY ACTIONS REFERRED TO MO-REMEDIAL
ANNUAL TARGET:
FY 96 QUARTER
SITE/STATE . NPL TYPE ! 1 ! 2
-------
OSWER # 9840.0
=r: 7-LIH- ' Sir
MP'._
TiArtoNs. r:E?;.-: ni-vi
ANNUAL TARGET:
SITE /STATE
-Y S6 C/UAr.Tt
NPL TYPE I 1 :
-------
OSWER # 9840.0
APPENDIX B
REMEDIAL SITE ACTIVITY LIST
-------
REMEDIAL SITE ACTIVITY
DEC 19 1984
SITE NAMF,
BEACON HEIGHTS, CT
KRLljnGG-nRRRING, CT
IAIJRRL PARK, CT
YAWDRSKI, CT
BAIRD (, McGUIRR, MA
CANNON RNGR/BRHGWrR, MA
CANNON ENGR/PLYMTH, MA
CHARLES QFXTRGE(TYNG) , MA
GROVELANO WRLIS, MA
HocoMONCo POND, MA
INPURTRI-PLRX 12R, MA(Wbhurn)
IRON HORSE PARK, MA
NRW BEOFHRn, MA
NYANZA CHEMICAL, MA
RE-SOI.VR, MA
JSILRESIM, MA
F. O'CONNOR SITR, MR
•
MCKIN COMPANY, ME
PINETTE'S SALVAGE, ME
SACO TANNING, ME
iwiNTMROP IANDPILL, ME
A1IBIIRN ROAD, NH
COAKIF.Y, NH
*
WVKR I.ANPFILL, Nl!
KREFR RNV. , NH
••
^tr^
FYRI
\ •
RI/FS
RI/FS
PYR2
' I
,
Rl/FS
RI/FS
nn
i • .-,
FYRI
0 ACTIVITY
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
4
4
1
4
4
RI/FS
RT/FS
RI/I--S
RI/FS
Rl/FS
RI/FS
RI/FS
Rl/FS
RI/FS
RH
RT/FS
IRM
.
Rl/FS
IRM
FYR4
0 ACTIVITY
1
2
2
4
•
4
1
2
2
2
1
1
RI/FS
RI/FS
RO
RA
RT/FS
RA
RI/FS
E RT/I=S
•
Rf/FS
R
RA
RO
RA
Ul>
RA
1?A
0
ra
»
=4fc
U3
00
^
O
•
o
-------
REMEDIAL SITE ATT1WITY LIST
REGN SITE NAME
01 OTTATI AND GOSS, NH
SAVAGE, NH
soMERSwnRTH LF, NH
SOtfTH MUNICIPAL, NH
SYLVESTER'S, NH (Nashua)
TINKHAM SITE, NH
DAVIS LIOUID, RI
PIC I U.O FARM, RI
STAMINA MILLS, RI
WESTERN SAND, RI
OLD SPRINGFIELD, VT
4
02 ASBESTOS DUMP, Nil
BEACHWnOD/BERKI.EY, Ml
BLUE SPRUCE, Ml
BOG CREEK, MI
BRADY METALS, Ml
BR I DGEPORT RENTAL, Ml
BURW^FLY BOG, NJ
CALDWELL TRUCKING, NJ
CHEMICAL COWmOL, Ml
(CHEMICAL INSECriCIDK, Ml
CHEMICAL LEAMAN, Ml
COMBE FILL NORTH, NJ
COMBE FILL sotrni, MI
DELILAH ROAD, Ml
DFN7.ER and SCHAFER, NJ
D'TMpERin PROPERTY, HI
EYRl
\
RI/FS
RA
RI/FS
RI/FS
.
FYR?
RI/FS
RA
RI/FS
IRM
RT/rs
fUM
FYR1
0 ACriVTTY
3
4
4
4
2
4
4
4
RT/I^
IRM
•
P. RI/FS
RI/FS
TRM
R1/I;S
RD
« ArilVMTY
3
2
1
2
;>
RA
RD
RA
•
Ri\
K'l>
O
i
=tfc
vo
00
4^
0
O
-------
PRMKDTAI. SI-PR ACTIVITY LIST
RRGN SITE NAMR
02 RLLIS PROPRRTY, Ml
RWAN PROPRRTY, Ml
FLORENCE LANDFILL, Ml
^FRIEDMAN PROPRRTY, MI
GRMS LANDFILL, Ml
GURN RIDGE RADIATION, Ml
GOOSE FARM, MJ
HRIJ-1N KRAMER LNDFL, Ml
HRRCULRS, Ml
IMPRRIAL OIL, Ml
KIN-FMIC LANDFILL, Ml
KING OF PRIKSIA, Ml
KRYSOWATY FARM, Ml
LANG PROPRRTY, Ml
LIPARI LANDFILL, Ml
UDNE PINR LANDFILL, Ml
MRTALTRC/ARROSYRTRMS, Ml
MONTCLAIR RADIATION, Ml
MONTftTMFRY TOWNSHIP, Ml
NASCOLITE, MI
NL IND1KTRIRS, Ml
PRPR FIRLD, Ml
1PLIAK FARM, MI
PRICK LANDFILL, Ml
RRICH FARMS, Ml
RRNORA, Ml
^H^lNOnOD MTNRS, Ml
^^nW'KAWAY lUTWHIQI, N.I
FYRl
\
RT/FS
RF/FS
,
FYR2
RI/FS
RI/FS
RD
RA
RD
IRM
RT/FS
RT/KS
IUM
RT/FS
FYR3
O ACTIVITY
3
4
2
4
4
^^.
RI/FS
RI/FS
*
RT/FS
RA
.
•RD
J^RI/FS
V^
FYR4
O ACTIVITY
4
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
9.
4
1
4
"'
RT/FS
RT/FS
RI/FS
RD
F. RI/FS
RD
RT/FS
RI/FS
RI/FS
RI/FS
RA
RI/FS
RT/I'S
FYflS
0 ACTIVITY
2
3
2
1
4
3
4
3
2
3
1
4
1
4
2
1
R.I/FS
RD
IRM
RI/I-S
RD/»?A
RD
RD
R RT/FS
R RT/FS
RA
TUM
RA
RI/FS
RD/RA
R RT/FS
RI/FS
FYR6
0 ACTIVITY
4
3
2
2
3
4
3
4
. 1
4
4
4
J
, '
RD
RD
RA
RA
RA
RD
RD
RD
RD
RA
RD
RD
nn
FYHV
O ACTIVITY
1
1
4
s
\
2
i
3
3
1
4
t
PA
HI)
I«A
\<\
UA
RA
•
RA
RA
RA
RD
RA
vo
CD
-------
I'ACK 4
REMEDIAL SITE ACTIVITY LIST
RECN SITE NAME
02 ROCKY HILL MUNICIPAL, 1*1
ROERLING STEEL, 1*1
SAYREVILLE L/F, N.1
SCP, N.1
RHARKEY LANDFILL, N.1
ISPENCB FARM, 1*1
SWOPE OIL, NJ
SYNCON RESINS, N.1
TABERNACLE DRIM, N.1
TOM'S DRIVER OIEMICAL, N.1
U.S. RADIUM, Ml
VENTRON/VELStOOL, Ml
WAIDTCK AEROSPACE, N.1
tillJjtAMS PROPERTY, N.1
BATAVIA LANDFILL, NY
BREWKTER WELLFIELD, NY
CLOTHIER, NY
FULTON TERMINALS, NY
G.B. MOREAI1, NY
n.M./CENTRAL FOUNDRY, NY
HAVILAND, NY
HOOKER/102ND STREET, NY
HOOKER/HYDE PARK, NY
HOOKER/S AREA, NY
HUlttON RIVER PCB, NY
,,~.~^,*,, ,.„,, , Mv
FYfll
\
FYR2
RT/FS
IHM
FYR3
O ACTIVITY
4
1
1
4
3
3
3
•
RI/FS
RI/FS
IRM
E RI/FS
E RI/FS
E RT/FS
E RI/FS
FYR4
O ACTIVITY
4
3
1
2
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
4
4
RI/FS
RI/FS
RI/FS
E RI/FS
E RI/FS
RT/FS
RI/FS
P RI/FS
RT/FS
E RI/FS
RI/FS
RD
UA
FYRS
O ACTIVITY
1
2
3
4
1
3
1
1
2
^
RT/I--S
E RI/FS
RI1
Rl>
RT/1--S
Rl/HS
RlA^S
R J /'FS
v r/FS
• » » ' i .x ;
FYRfi
0 ACriVITY
4
3
1
4
2
3
4
4
1
4
RD
Rh
RH
RA
RA
RA
RD
RD
RD
RA
FYM7
(> ACTIVITY
\
2
1
4
1
4
3
2
3
1
4
1
4
1
4
.'
1*
KA
m>
KA
Kit
UA
KA
Kl)
KA
Kl»
I'A
RH
KA
RM
KA
KM
fQ
S
w
=*=
vo
oo
O
0
-------
RFMF.11IAL SITF ACTIVITY LIST
SITE NAME
KENPICKY AVENUE, NY
I/WE CANAL, NY
MARATHON BATTERY, NY
OLEAN WELLFIELP, NY
PAS/OSWBfJO, NY
ROBINTECH, NY
SARNF.Y PROPERTY, NY
SINCLAIR REFINERY, NY
SMS INI1KTRIES, NY
SUFFERN WELL FIELP, NY
VESTAL, NY
VOLNEY L/F, NY
WIPE HFACH, NY
YORK OIL, NY
FIBERS PUBLIC SUPPLY, PU
.1UNCOS LANDFILL, PR
VRRA ALT A, PR
TOP 11
TBP 12
PELAWARE SAND, PF.
HARVEY-KN01T, PP.
TYBOUTS CORNER, HE
ml^MJCKf IF
•^•j - 1
JEPlESTONE ROAP, MH
FYR1
RI/i
RI/FS
RH
RI/FS
FYR2
RA
RA
FYR3
0 ACTTVT.TY
4
4
.
4
4
4
4
4
4
3
2
RI/FS
RT/FS
1» 1 /FS
•
UT/FS
F. RI/FS
F. RT/FS
RI/FS
R I/PS
IUM
i»T/FS
LA-
FYR4
O ACTIVITY
2
2
4
RT/FS
RI/FS
RT/FS
FYRS
0 ACTIVITY
4
3
3
2
2
4
2
3
2
4
1
3
2
3
3
4
2
4
5
RD
Rl)
Rl)
TNM
E RT/FS
E RT/FS
RH
RI/I-S
RT/l'S
RP
RT/I^
RO
E RI/FS
R l?!/!^
F, RI/FS
l?l)
)">
PA
I'.'M
FYR6
0 ACTIVITY
3
2
2
1
3
2
1
4
1
4
3
4
\
RA
.
RA
RA
RA
RA
RA
RP
RA
RD
RA
RA
RP
im
I-'YH/
0 ACTIVITY
V
1
4
1
4
i
Rl)
Ul)
UA
Ul) .
RA
RA
O
w
S
=»*=
vo
00
0
9
O
-------
RRMKDrAf.. SITF ACTIVITY LIST
RRfU SITE NAMR
03 MimLRTowN ROAD, MD
SAND, GRAVEL & STONE, MO
BERKS SAND PIT, PA
RLOBRNSKI, PA
BROnHEAD CRERK, PA
BRUIN LAOOON, PA
nORNEY ROAD, PA
PTOIIGIASVILLB, PA
DRAKE CHEMICAL, PA
FAST MT4 7. ION, PA
RVTKRPRISE AVF.., PA
HAVERTOWN PCP, PA
HEUWA LANDFILL, PA
HENIHRSON ROAD, PA 1
INDUSTRIAL LANE, PA
LACKAWANNA, PA
•
LF.HIGH ELRCTRIC, PA
2MCJ\DOO ASSOCIATES, PA
MILL CREF.K, PA
MOYRRS LANDFK.L, PA
PAIHRRTON ZINC, PA
TAYLOR nOROUHH,PA
TYSONS DISPOSAL, PA
VODRWAN FARM, PA
KY8I
N
RI/FS
RD
Rl/FS
FYR2
RA
RA
RT/PS
FYB3
O ACTIVITY
4
. -1
4
2
4
4
2
4
4
RI/FS
RT/KS
R RF/FS
RI/FS
RI/FS
Rl/FS
RD
RT/FS
RI/FS
PYR4
o ArnviTv
2
4
2
I
4
2
1
1
2
2
4
1
2
1
2
RI/FS
RI/FS
RI/FS
RT/FS
RD
RI/FS
RA
Rl/PS
RI/FS
R RI/FS
IRM
RT/FS
F. RI/FS
RT/FS
RT/FS
FYRS
O ACTIVITY
4
4
2
3
2
4
4
4
3
1
3
RD
RD
RA
RD
RD
n\
im
im
PD
lit)
U'X
FYRfi
0 ACTIVITY
1
4
3
1
4
1
4
1
4
3
1
4
2
2
1
4
3
3
2
1
4
RD
RA
RA
RD
RA
RD
RA
RD
RA
RA
RD
RA
RD
RA
RD
RA
RA
RA
RA
RD
R/V
I-'YH/
0 ACTIVITY
1
RA
.
O
g
13
^t=
vo
00
*>
o
•
o
2 - Enforcement Takeover
-------
REMEDIAL-S fTE ACTIVITY LIST
RBON SITE NAME
03 WALSH ROAD, PA
WESTLINE, PA
CHISMAN CREEK, VA
MATTHEWS ELECTROPLAT, VA
SALTVILLE WASTE IMS P. , VA
LEETOWN PESTICIDE, WV
MCCLINTIC, WV
TRD 1 I
TRD 1 2
TRD 1 3
T
TRD 4
TRD 5
TBD 6
TRD 7
TRD R
TRD 9
DIOXIN 11
DIOXW 1 2
DIOXIN 1 3
04 MORRAY ENGINEERING, AL
PER I DIDO OROUNDWATER, At.
STAUFFER/COLD CREEK, At.
STAIIFFER/LEMOYNE, AL
TRIANA, AL
62ND STREET DUMP, PL
FYR1
\
RI/FS
'
FYR2
RT/HS
0 /
4
4
4
4
'
4}
FYR3
ACTIVITY
.
RI/FS
RI/FS
RD
RT/FS
iT
0 f
2
I
2
2
•
3
FYR4
ACTIVITY
RT/FS
RA
RI/FS
RT/FS
RI/FS
nr/r;
0 I
4
2
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
4
2
3
3
7
I
1
1
FYRS
XCTIV! ". «•
RD
RT/KS
RI/FS
RI/P;
RI/Ri
Rt/IN
E RI/KS
E RI/I--S
E RT/FS
E RI/FfJ
E RI/FS
E ntA-s
E RJ/l-'S
Rl/IN
RT/FS
E RI/FS
E R!/F"S
O ^
1
4
3
1
4
1
4
2
1
4
3
S
FYR6
ACTIVITY
RD
RA
RA
RD
RA
RD
RA
RD
RD
RA
RD
UD
RA
' KO
0 /
1
1
4
1
4
1
4
2
2
•
I
1
4
1
4
2
\
XCTIVITY
•
UA
KM
RA
Ul>
\>
I)
U/\
RM
UM
RD
RA
RD
KA
U.A
1^^
O
|
Jo
=**=
00
O
O
-------
REMEDIAL SITE ACTIVITY LIST
SITE NAME
COLFMAN EVANS, FL
HIPII>S ROAD L/F, FL
KASSAllF-KIMERLINCi, FL
MIAMI DRJJM SERVICES, FL
NW 5RTH STREET, FL
PEPPER STEEL, FL
PICKETIVILLE ROAD, FL
PIONEER SAND, FL
SAPP BATTERY, FL
TOWER CHEMICAL, FL
VARSOL SPILL, FL
4
WHltTEHOUSB WASTE OIL, FL
ZELLWnOD GROUNDWATER, FL
LUMINOUS PROCESSES, CA
POWERS VI LIJR, CA
2A.L.TAYLOR SITE, KY
AI'RCO, KY
B.F.OnonRTCH, KY
DISTLRK BRICKYARD, KY
•
DISTLER FARM, KY
LEE'S LANE LANDFILL, KY '
NEWPORT DUMP, KY
FLownon SITE, MS
CHEMTRONICS, NC
'
PCB ROADSIDE SPILLS, NC
BO IFF ROAD/SCRDI, SC
CAROIAWN, SC
FYRI
RI/FS
RI/FS
FYR2
IRM
RI/FS
IRM
RA
RA
IU/FS
TRM
FYR3
0 ACTIVITY
2
2
4
.
4
4
4
4
RI/FS
i
HI AS
RI/FS
t
HI /PS
RT/FS
E RT/FS
E RT/FS
FYR4
0 ACTIVITY
4
4
1
2
4
2
2
2
4
4
4
7
RT/FS
RI/FS
RT/FS
E RI/PS
E RT/FS
RT/FS
E RI/PS
E RI/FS
E RI/PS
E RI/FS
E IU /PS
PI/I-'S
FYRS
O ACTIVITY
4
2
4
1
1
2
2
1
1
TRM
RD
RA
Rlt
RD
n I A~s
RT/FS
RI/KS
\>n
FYRfi
0 ACTIVITY
4
4
1
I
4
I
4
2
1
4
2
1
4
2
2
I
RD
RD
RD
RD
RA
RD
RA
RA
RD
RA
RA
RD
'RA
RD
RA
RD
FYHV
) ACTIVITY
^
\
2
1
4
1
1
4
1
4
RA
UA
KA
im
RA
RA
Rl)
RH
RA
|
9
=»te
VO
00
O
O
-------
REMEDIAL SITE ACTIVITY LIST
PACE
REGN SITE NAME
04 GEIGRR, SC
TNI*; PENDENT NAIL, SC
PALMETIT) WTlOD, SC
WAMCHEM, SC
GALLOWAY PITS, TO
MURRAY-OHIO DUMP, TO
NORTH HOLLYWOOD, TO
VELSICOL/HARDKMAN, TN
OS A & F MATERIALS, IL
ACME SOLVENT, IL
BRLVIDERE L/F, IL
BYRON SALVAGE YARD, IL
4
CROS9 BROS/PEMBROKE, IL
JOHNS-MANVILLE, IL
KERR McGEE, IL
LASALLF. ELECTRIC, IL
NATIONAL LEAD, IL
OUTBOARD MARINE CORP, IL
PAGEL'S PIT, IL
PETERSON SAND, IL
RIVERDALE, IL
SHEFFIELD, IL
VELSICOL/MARSHAU,, IL
WAUCONPA SAND, IL
AMERICAN CHEM SERVE, IN
2ENVIRO-CHEM, IN
FISHER CAIO, IN
FF. WAYNE REDUCTION, IN
LAKE SANDY ,TO, IN
^^AN STREET WRLI. F[F,m, IN
^^^
FYRl
•
FYR2
RI/FS
FYfl3
0 ACriVITY
3
3
3
3
4
2
4
3
*
RI/FS
RI/PS
RI/FS
D r Sf?c
•» 1 / " r^
E RI/FS
RI/FS
RI/FS
RI/FS
FYR4
0 ACTIVITY
4
2
2
4
I
2
4
4
4
4
4
2
RI/FS
RI/PS
R RI/FS
RI/FS
R RI/FS
RI/FS
RD
RI/FS
RI/FS
RT/FS
.
R RT/FS
R I/FS
FYflS
0 ACTIVITY
3
2
2
4
1
1
3
2
2
2
4
1
1
1
2
7.
7
RT/FS
R RI/FS
RI/FS
RD
R RI/FS
RD
PA
RD
Rn
E RI/FS
RA
E RT/FS
F. RI/FS
R RI/FS
RI/l-S
R 1 /'• ':>
m>
FYR6
4
2
3
1
4
4
1
1
4
4
4
1
4
7.
1
Rn
Rn
RA
Rn
RA
RD
RA
RA
RD
RD
RD
RD
RA
R!)
IM
I'YHV
0 ACTIVITY
1
•).
\
4
1
3
3
3
3
I
/I
1
KA
XI)
un
K/\
RA
RA
1
RA
\\\
RA
Rn
RA
R«\
o
§
Q
=«=
vo
CO
o
o
-------
RKMRDIAL STTR ACTIVITY LIST
RITR NAME
MARION BRAGG, IN
MinCO I, IN
MII1CO II, IN
NORTHS IDB SANITARY LF, IN
PORR FARM, IN
RRILLY TAR, IN
SRYMCUR RECYCLING, IN
WYNR WASTE, IN
WRTOEB, IN
BRRI.IN & FARRO, MI
BURROWS SANITATI(TN, MI
BirrrKRWHRTH 1./F, MI
CFMBIEKY WMP, MI
CHARLRV/niX MUNICIPAL, MI
CLARK MUNICIPAL, MI
CLIFF/DOW PIMP, MI
FOREST WASTF. PROIllCrS, Ml
G S. II INDUSTRIAL, MI
cRATimr cawTY LDFL, MI
IONIA L/F, MI
K & L L/F, MI
LIQUID DISPORAL, MI
MFrFAMflRA L/F, MI
NnRrUFRNAIRK, MI
NOVACO TBMW.RANCR, MI
arr/STORY/CORITA/A, MI
PACKAGING COUP, Ml
RASMUSSKN'S M IMP, MT
FYRl
\
RI/FS
RD
FYR2
IRM
RT/PS
IRM
RA
o ;
4
4
4
4
3
-
4
4
4
K,
FYRl
ACTIVITY
R Rf/FS
R RI/FS
.
RI/I-'S
RI/P'S
RI/PS
RI/FS
F. Rl/FS
R Rf/FS
t"* * /!.'<_'
O f
2
2
2
4
3
3
2
1
3
4
4
2
3
FYR4 •
ACTIVITY
R RI/FS
RI/FS
R RI/FS
R Rt/PS
RI/FS
TTIM
R RI/FS
RI/FS
IRM
R RI/FS
R RT/FS
R RT/FS
RI/FS
O »
2
4
1
1
3
2
4
3
2
2
3
4
3
3
2
PYRS
OIVITY
RI/K;
RH
HI/FT,
R RT/I/S
RT/I'^
RO
RA
RA
RD
R TA':j
l
RD
RA '
(
Rt/l'S
RP
1W"
O *
3
1
4
1
4.
2
4
FYRfi
ACTIVITY
RA
RH
RA
RD
RA
RA
RH
im
C) /i
1
4
4
1
4
?
1
•1
2
I
i
FYM7
WTIVITY
un
R<\
Kh
Rl>
\<\
un
xn
i
-------
IW a-: 11
REMEDIAL SITF. ACHVITY LIST
REGN SITE NAME
05 SPIEGELBIJRG L/F, MI
SPRINGFIELD DUMP, MI
TAR LAKE, MI
VERONA WELL FIELD, MI
ARROWHEAD REFINERY, MN
KOCH REFINING/N-REN, MN
KOPPER GAS & COKE, MN
KlIMMER, MN
LEHILLIER/MANKATO, MN
LONG PRAIRIE, MN
MORRIS ARSENIC, MN
3MACGILLIS AND GIBBS, MN
NAT'L JLFAD/rARACORP, MN
NEW BRIGHTON, MN
PINE BEND SLF/CROSBY, MN
REILLY TAR, MN
SOirrH ANIYWER, MN
ST. LOOIS RIVER, MN
WASTE DISPOSAL ENGR, MN
WHITCAKER, MN
ALLIED CHEMICAL, OH
ARCANIM IRON & METAL, OH
BOWERS LANDFILL, OH
BUCKEYE RECLAMATION, OH
CHKM-DYNE CORP, OH
^^^
^^rnsHorroN, OH
FYRl
\
RI/FS
FYB2
RI/FS
IWJ
O ACTIVITY
f
4
4
\
4
4
RI/FS
1U/FS
IRM
' IRM
RI/FS
^^^
,, ... . i "^f
FYR4
0 ACTIVITY
3
3
3
2
4
1
4
2
4
4
4
1
2
1
RI/FS
RI/FS
F.
RD
RD
RA
RA
RD
RD
RD
RD
RA
RA
RD
RD
RA
RD
RA
RD
RA
RD
RA
RD
« UD
FYH7
0 ACTIVITY
,
').
\
4
1
1
4
i
}.
\
,
8
•1
1
i
I
I
4
1
RA
RA
Iv'll
\"\
WD
IMi
RA
RA
RA
M
RA
un
ItA
RA
|JD
RA
KD
It K
^^
'J^r
O
1
W
^
vo
00
ȣ*
O
0
-------
REMEDIAL SITE ACTIVITY LIST
SITE NAME
FIII.TZ L/F, OH
INI11KTRIAL EXCESS, OH
LASKTN/POPLAR, OH
MIAMI COUNTY DIMP, OH
NEW LYME LANDFILL, OH
OLD MILL, OH
PRISTINE L/F, OH
SKINNER L/F, OH
S. POINT PLANT, OH
SI MM IT NATIONAL, OH
UNITED SCRAP LEAD, OH
EAIH CLARE, WI
. 4
MASTER DISPOSAL, WI
MIIVSTATE DISPOSAL, WI
SMALTZ IllMP, WI .
TOD I
TOD 2
TOD 3
TOD 4^
TOD 5
CECIL LINDSAY, AR
QIRLEY PITS, AR
INDUSTRIAL WASTE, AR
MIDLAND PRODUCTS, AR
MiD-soirrH, AR
VERTAC, AR
FYfll
\
FYR2
FYRl
0 ACPIVITY
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
RI/FS
RI/FS
RT/FS
RI/FS
E RT/FS
F. Ul/FS
F Rf/FS
PYR4
0 ACTIVITY
4
4
2
4
4
2
1
2
RT/FS
RD
E RI/FS
RI/FS
E RI/FS
RI/FS
RI/FS
E RI/FS
FYRS
O ACTIVITY
I
1
3
4
I
1
4
1
4
3
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
2
RI/FS
IRM
RD
RA
RI/FS
RI/FS
IRM
RI/FS
TRM
RI/FS
TRM
RI/FS
E RT/FS
E RI/FS
E RT/FS
E RI/FS
E RI/FS
RT/FS
FYR6
0 ACTIVITY
4
I
I
4
4
2
2
2
RD
RA
RD
RA
RD
RD
RD
RD
FYH7
0 ACTIVITY
3
1
4
3
1
4
1
1
4
1
4
:>
\
i
4
1
1
/I
RA
RH
RA
RA
RD
RA
RA
'RD
RA
RD
RA
RD
RA
im
RA
RA
im
RA
8
@
W
=»-.
00
o
• o
-------
,f. I I
REMEDIAL SITE ACTIVITY LIST
RITE NAME
BAYOU BONFOUCA, LA
BAYOU SORRELL, LA
CLEVE-RERER , LA
OLD INGER OIL, IA
PETRO PROCESSORS, IA
4TATE COVE, LA
PREwrrr REFINERY, NM
SOUTH VALLEX, NM
UNITED NUCLEAR, NM
COMPASS INDUSTRIES, OK
HARDAGE/CRINER, OK
SAND SPRJNGS, OK
TAR CREEK/niTAWA, OK
BIO-ECOLOGY, TX
BRIO OIL REFINERY, TX
CAVALCADE NORTH, TX
CAVALCADE SOUTH, TX
CRYSTAL CHEMICAL, TX
FRENCH LIMITED, TX
GENEVA INDUSTRIES, TX
HARRIS SITE, TX
HIGHLANDS ACID PIT, TX
KOPPBRS-TBXARKANA
MOTCO, TX
IMjKSA CHROMIUM »1 , TX
0VSA CHROMIUM »2, TX
r«-»piv\ r-ni.^M ir'rir TV
FYR1
\
RT/FS
FYR2
RT/FS
RI/FS
RI/FS
RI/FS
RT/FS
RT/FS
FYR3
O ACTIVITY
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
3
RI/FS
RI/FS
RT/FS
E RI/FS
RT/FS
E RI/FS
RT/FS
T'JM
RT/FS
RIAS
HUM.
KYR4
O ACTIVITY
4
4
3
' -
3
3
3
4
4
1
3
4
4
4
TRM
RD
RI/FS
RT/FS
RD
RA
RD
RT/FS
RT/FS
RD
RA
HI AS
RI/FS
* ; RI/FS
FYRS
O ACTIVITY
4
4
4
2
2
4
I
5
I
4
1
2
RD
RD
RA
RI/FS
TRM
RA
Rf/FTi
E RI/FS
RD
RA
E Rl/FS
RD
FYR6
O ACTIVITY
3
I
4
3
1
4
1
4
4
1
4
1'
4
I
4
1
4
4
RA
RD
RA
RA
RD
RA
RD
RA
RD
RD
RA
RD
RA
RD
RA
RA
HD
RD
!- ' : IS)
FYM7
0 ACTIVITY
1
4
2
1
1
4
1
1
1
HD
HA
HD
HA
HD
RA
U'V
HA
in
vo
00
-------
I'ACK
REMEDIAL SITE AenviTY LIST
REHN SITE NAME
Ob TRIANGLE CHEMICAL, TX
IINITBO CREOKOTINC,, TX
07 AIDEX CORPORATION, IA
DES MOINRS TCE(DICO), IA
LAnotiNTY LANDFILL, IA
ARKANSAS CITY DUMP, KS
CHEROKEE COUNTY, KS
ARENA 2: MINKER/STTW
ELLISVILLE SITES, MO
FiNnerr/ST. CHARLRS, MO
FULHRIC^rT, MO
TIMKS BRACK, MO
•mn 11
TRD 12
TBD 13
TBD 14
TRD 15
TflD 16
TWO 17,
TBD 18
08 IWODERICK WmD, CO
CALIFORNIA «ILCH, CO
CENTRAL CITY, CO
PFNVER RADIUM, CO
IPWRY LANDFHJ., CO
ROCKY MTN. ARSFNAf,, CO
RWD CRKF.K, CO
FYRI
\
IU/FS
RI/PS
FY82
RI/Ffi
TRM
RI/FS
IRM
FYRI
O ACTIVITY
4
2
1
2
4
2
4
4
4
4
Rl/KS
RtAS
RA
1UM
•>
RI/FS
RA
E RI/FS
Rl/FS
R RT/FS
RT/FS
FY84
O ACTIVITY
2
4
7
2
4
1
4
4
2
2
R[/FS
RD
E RI/FS
E RI/FS
RT/FS
RD
E RI/FS
R RI/FS
RD
E Rt/FS
FYRS
O ACTWlTv
3
4
4
4
I
4
3
3
4
2
2
3
3
2
1
Rl>
R»\
RA
RA
RD
RI/FS
RI/PS
RI/FS
RI/FS
E RI/FS
E RT/FS
E R l/FS
E RI/PV,
RH
RT/::;
FY86
0 ACTIVITY
2
3
1
4
I
4
RD
RD
RD
RA
RA
RD
FYH7
o ArnviTY
1
2
3
>
2
3
1
4
1
RA
KA
RD
R1>
Rh
U|)
Kl)
RA
KA
O
S
S
*=
, •*
bo
0^
o
o
-------
I'M a-: is
REMEDIAL STTP. ACrfVITY LIST
09
SITE NAME
SMDGT.LER MTN., CO
WOODWIRY CHEMICAL, co
ANACONDA SMELTER, MT
ANACONDA/GREAT FALLS, MT
EAST HELENA SMELTER, MT
MILLTOWN, MT
SILVER ROWr MT
ARSENIC TRIOXIDE, ND
MONTICBLLO, irr
OLSEN/MIEHART, ITf
SHARON STEEL, IIT
4
TAPtJTIMU FARM, AS
ORITOT LANDFILL, HI
PCB WAREHOUSE, CM
PCR WASTES, TT
INDIAN REND, AZ
LITCHFIELD AIRPORT, AZ
MOUNTAIN VIEW/GLOBE, AS
+B
TIICSON AIRPORT, AZ
ATLAS, CA
GOALINCA, CA
CELTOR CHEMICAL, CA
PEL NORTE, CA
IRON MOUNTAIN MINE, CA
JIHNOOM JUNKYARD, CA *
FYRS
\
FYR2
RT/FS
RD
FYR1
0 ACTIVITY
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
.
1
1
1
1
4
2
3
1
4
4
4
'RT/FS
E RT/FS
E RT/FS
E RI/FS
RT/FS
RT/FS
IUM
RT/FS
RT/FS
RIAS
RT/FS
E RI/FS
E RI/FS
RD/RA
1U/FS
RT/FS
TUM
RT/FS
FYR4
O ACTIVITY
1
1
2
2
4
4
3
\
RD
RA
RA
•
E RI/PS
RT/FS
RI/FS
RT/FS
IU/KS
FYRS
0 ACTIVITY
8
2
4)
2
2
2
4
4
4
1
.1
E RT/FS
RD
RA
RI/FS
RI/FS
RT/FS
RA
RD
RD
RD
I'A
FYR6
O ACTIVITY
1
4
2
4
4
3
1
4
RD
RA
RD
RD
RD
RA
RD
RA
PYM7
0 ACTIVITY
1
4
1
4
1
4
1
4
I
1
1
im
UA
un
I*A
HI)
1^
KM
K/V
UA
UA
RA
§
@
?o
^»^
VD
CO
lt>
O
«
O
-------
REMEDIAL SITK ACTIVITY LIST
i>Aa-: if,
REGN RITR NAME
09 MCCOLL SITE, CA
OPERATING INDUSTRIES, CA
PURITY OIL, CA
SAN FERNANDO AREA 1 I
SAN FERNANDO AREA 1 2
SAN FERNANDO AREA 1 3
SAN FERNANDO AREA 1 4
SAN GABRIEL 1, CA
SAN GABRIEL 2, CA
SAN GABRIEL 3, CA
SAN GABRIEL 4, CA
SELMA PRESSURE, CA
SOUTH QAY SITE, CA
STRINGFELLOW ACID, CA
HAWAII WELLS, HI
10 BIWKER HILL, ID
IWITED CHROME, OR
COIflBRT LANDFILL, WA
cow BAY/KEARSHORE, WA
COMM BAY/S TACOMA, WA
FRONTIER HARD CHROME, WA
GREENACRES L/F, WA
MIDWAY L/F, WA
MORTHSIDE L/F, WA
PONDERS CORNER ( I AKEWTDD) , WA
FYfll
\
RD
RI/FS
FYR2
RI/FS
FYR3
O ACTIVITY
4
3
4
4
2
3 '
RT/FS
RI/FS
RA
TRM
TRM
RT/FS
FY«4 '
0 ACTIVITY
3
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
2
4
2
2
RD
RA
RT/FS
RT/FS
TRM
RT/FS
RT/FS
RT/FS
RI/PS
TRM
RT/FS
R T/FS
FYRS
0 ACTIVITY
3
4
2
4
4
4
4
2
2
3
1
3
1
4
2
2
2
E RT/FS
RD
TRM
RI/FS;
RI/FS
RT/FS
RI/FS
E RT/FS
RT/FS
RI/FS
E RI/FS
RD
RD
RA
RT/FS
RT/FS
RI/FS
FYB6
O ACTIVITY
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
I
4
2
2
RA
RD
RD
RD
RD
RA
RD
RD
RA
RD
RD
FYH7
0 ACTIVITY
3
3
3
}
2
2
2
2
1
4
2
1
1
1
4
1
4
I
4
1
im
RD
KM
RD
RA
RA
RA
RA
RD
RA
RD
RA
RA
RD
RA
RA
RD
RA
RA
Q
§
9
=«=
co
o
o
-------
W.K I?
RFMKniAl. SITF ACTIVITY LIST
in
SITF NAME
TAR PITS, WA
TOFTnAHL DRUMS, WA
WBSTERN PROCRSSTNG, WA
TRH 13
PY81
\
FYR2
FY83
O ACTIVITY
4
4
R RI/PS
Rl/h-S
i
PYR4
0 ACTIVITY
PYRS
0 ACTIVITY
I
2
3
Rl/Pf;
RD
F. Rt/PS
FYR6
0 ACriVITV
1
RA
FY»7
o AITIVITY
l
4
m>
Kfli
=«:
VO
00
O
o
------- |