United States
                       Environmental Protection
                       Agency
Office of
Solid Waste and
Emergency Response
PB93-963 351
9320.2-08FS
November 1993
                        EPA  Completes  Construction  at
                        217 Sites  by  September 30,1993
   Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
   Hazardous Site Control Division 5203G
                               Quick Reference Fact Sheet
For the past two years, completing construction at hazardous waste sites on the National Priorities List - the nation's most pressing
hazardous waste sites - has been the top priority of the Superfund program. Since 1991, when the final cleanup remedy was considered
completed at only 61 sites, EPA has made significant progress, doubling and then more than tripling that number in the last 2 years. During
Fiscal Year (FY) 1993, final remedy construction was completed at 68 sites, increasing the total to 217. These 217 sites demonstrate the
diversity of the nation's hazardous waste sites: the chemical contaminants, geographic locations, and cleanup technologies present unique
challenges at each site. Although construction of the final site remedy has been completed at the 217 sites, many of the sites may require
long-term operation of the cleanup technology to ensure that the cleanup is effective and protective of human health and the environment.
While the completion of construction at 217 sites represents a meaningful accomplishment in finalizing activities at sites, it portrays only
a portion of the total work under Superfund to address hazardous sites, conduct site assessments to evaluate the need and type of cleanup
required, and construct cleanup remedies. EPA intends to continue to emphasize completing final remedy construction and is moving
forward toward goals set for the year 2000.
WHAT IS THE CONSTRUCTION
COMPLETION LIST?

In the early years of the Superfund program, EPA concentrated
on starting cleanups at sites, striving to identify and evaluate sites
as quickly as possible. After many years of experience and
substantial progress, EPA now turns its attention to the sites near
the  end of the  Superfund process.  EPA realized that the
accomplishments of the Superfund  program  were not being
conveyed effectively to the public. The number of sites deleted
from the National Priorities List (NPL) did not accurately reflect
the amount of work completed and the extent to which threats
were actually mitigated at Superfund sites. Due to the frequent
need to conduct complex, long-term remedies and the stringent
regulatory criteria for site deletion, sites must remain on the NPL
despite the fact that extensive remedial actions have taken place
and the site may no longer present a threat to human health and
the environment.

EPA established the construction completion list to capture these
milestones and more accurately communicate progress  toward
cleaning up NPL sites. The list includes:

•    Sites where physical construction is completed and that have
    an operating remedy in place that will take many years to
    complete (such  as groundwater pump-and-treatment,
    bioremediation or soil vapor extraction)
     •   Sites where the response action only requires measures that
        do not involve construction (such as institutional controls)

     •   Sites where all remedial action is completed and that will
        most likely be deleted when the required public notice and
        state consultation process has been completed.

     The construction completion list was officially announced to the
     public in the Federal Register on March 2,1993 (58 FR 12142).
     The list as of September 30,1993, is provided at the end of this
     fact sheet.
    WHAT ARE THE NATIONAL  COMPLETION
    TARGETS?

    At the time the construction completion list was created, 61 sites
    had been completed or deletedfrom the NPL. InFY 1992,EPA's
    Administrator established national targets to more than double
    the number of NPL construction completions by the end of FY
    1992 (a goal of 130 sites), more than triple the number by the end
    of FY 1993 (200 sites), and a goal of more than 650 sites by the
    year 2000.

    EPA has met and exceeded these goals. As the following table
    illustrates, EPA completed construction at 149 sites by Septem-
    ber 30,1992, exceeding the target of 130 by approximately 15
    percent.  For FY 1993, EPA again surpassed its target, reaching

-------
217 sites by September 30,1993. EPA staff at Headquarters and
in the Regions worked closely to achieve this rigorous pace,
using improved communication, streamlined requirements, and
comprehensive tracking systems to ensure sites meet construction
completion criteria.

   Number of Construction Complete Sites Exceeds
                     EPA's Goals

FY80 - 91
FY92
FY93
Year 2000
Sites
Added
N/A
88
68

Cumulative
Sites Goal
N/A
130
200
650
Total
Sites
61
149
217

WHAT  KIND  OF  SITES  ARE  ON  THE
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION LIST?

The national distribution of the construction completion list sited
mirrors the NPL both geographically and numerically, with sites
from 47  states and 2 territories.  The  United  States map
demonstrates construction completion site distribution and equity.

The 217 sites currently on the list also reflect the makeup of the
NPL in terms  of site type.  Sites range from landfills and
industrial sites to mines and well fields. The technologies used
to clean up these sites and reduce the environmental threats are
as diverse.  Tailored to the problems at  each  site, solutions
include straightforward remedies like excavation or an alternate
water supply, and complex, sophisticated techniques such as
bioremediation or thermal desorption. Using both containment
and treatment technologies as remedies, EPA has increasingly
selected permanent treatment over containment  Innovative
technologies are a steady by-product of the Superfund process,
and were used  at 19 construction  completion list sites.  The
technologies used are listed in the table on page 3.

Because sites often have complex or multiple contamination
issues being addressed in separate cleanup actions, a site is only
eligible for the construction completion list when all areas of the
                Distribution of Construction Complete Sites Versus Total Sites on the Current NPL
                    AMERICAN
                  SAMOA, GUAM
                     & TRUST
                   TERRITORIES
                                                                     Construction
                                                                      Completed
   NPL total includes proposed and final sites

-------
Technologies Used at Construction Complete Sites
       SITE REMEDY/TECHNOLOGY
  CONTAINMENT
    Excavationand..Removal                     168
 	Surface Capping/Spi|Cpyer                   86
    Surtac_e_pjaJ_nage_Cpntrpj.                     34
   .BacMijijng30..
    Splidificatipn/Stabilizatipn & Immpbijizatipn      15
 Ilsiurry^WallsIIIIIIII^IIIII^I^IIII
 	Drum.Storage	2.

  TREATMENT	
 	.GrQ.undwater.P.g.mp.and.Treatroent	63.
 	Ajr.Strippjng	27..
    Innovative Technologies                      19
          Soil Vapor Extraction (9)
          Bioremediation (3)
          Thermal Desorption (3)
          Dechlorination (2)
          In-Situ Flushing (1)
          Soil Washing (1)
    incineration                                 13
    Leachate Treatment                          8
    Neutralization                                4

  OTHER ACTIONS	
    Grpundyvater Mpnitpring/Vyens                126
 	institutional. Controls	71
 	Alternate. .Water.Su.ppJy	33.
    Relocation of Residents                       2
SITES*
site are addressed and physical construction is completed for all
site actions. The percentage of listed sites using more complex
remedies and treatment technologies has increased steadily over
time, while the percentage of sites with no cleanup required or
containment-only remedies has steadily decreased, as illustrated
in the figure below.  Sites using treatment technologies and a
combination  of treatment strategies, waste  removal, and
containment have increased from 10(16%) on the initial list to 39
(57%) for sites added in FY 1993. Similarly, the number of sites
requiring only nonconstruction  actions such as institutional
controls or for which a decision of no cleanup necessary is made
based on a comprehensive remedial investigation has declined
since the creation of the construction completion list: the initial
site list had 8 no remedy sites (13%), but EPA added only 3 (4%)
inFY 1993. These statistics indicate EPA is accomplishing more
meaningful cleanups as well as improving the rate of construction
completion.

The responsibility for cleaning  up sites  on the construction
completion list involves states and responsible parties as well as
EPA.  Responsible parties include original polluters, current
landowners, and other legally responsible private parties that
contributed to contamination at a site.  The decision of who will
lead the cleanup for a site is made on a site-specific basis, with
EPA always overseeing activities. As seen in the figure on page
4, responsible parties have taken responsibility for undertaking
and financing cleanups at the largest percentage of listed sites,
demonstrating the success of EPA's enforcement first strategy.
  More than one technology may be associated with any completed site.
                                     Increased Focus on Treatment Technologies
                                                                   FY93
                                           FY92
                   FY80-
                   FY91
                                                                                            TOTAL
                                                                            No Cleanup Necessary Under CERCLA '

                                                                            Nonconstruction Remedy

                                                                            Treatment and Containment

                                                                         I—I Treatment Only

                                                                         LSI Containment Only
          Includes sites deferred to alternate authorities.

-------
WHAT   HAPPENS  TO   A   SITE   AFTER
CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE?

The remedial process can be very complex, taking many years to
complete for large or difficult sites.  Toward the end of that
process  a  long  period of time may pass when  the remedy
construction is complete, but the site requires some kind of
ongoing or periodic work. For example, a site may only need
routine maintenance,  such  as  ensuring a landfill  cap  is not
deteriorating, or operation of a cleanup technology, such as a
groundwater pump-and-treat system that may require 30 years to
complete treatment. The construction completion list identifies
sites at an advanced stage of the remedial process, when all
anticipated construction of the remedy or site actions is com-
pleted.  Construction completion sites  can be sites awaiting
deletion, sites that require no further action, sites where response
action continues in the form of institutional controls such as deed
or zoning restrictions but no further construction is required, or
sites with long-term response actions (LTRAs), which require a
continuous period of on-site activity before cleanup levels are
achieved. There may be continuing site activity to maintain and
operate sites where construction is complete.

The construction completion list has no regulatory significance
and inclusion does not mean the same thing as site deletion from
the  NPL.  Of the 217 sites on the list, 51 have been deleted
according to the procedural  requirements  in the National
Contingency Plan as of September 30,1993. The remaining sites
on the construction completion list will also ultimately be deleted.
Each site must go through the regulatory and site review process
to verify that all cleanup goals have been met, then the notice to
delete the site will be published in the Federal Register to be
subject to public comment.
Responsible Parties, States, and EPA Managed
   Cleanups* at Construction Complete Sites

                State
              (28 Sites)
                                                   EPA
                                                (85 Sites)
   Responsible^
     Parties
    (104 Sites)
   "  Denotes lead for last cleanup project.

FOR FURTHER  INFORMATION

For information on the status of the construction completion list,
contact the RCRA/Superfund Hotline at 1-800-424-9346 (TDD
800-553-7672), or in the Washington, DC, area, (703) 412-9810
(TDD (703) 412-3323). For further information contact:

Design and Construction Management Branch (5203G)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC  20460
(703) 603-8830
 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION SITES THROUGH FY 1993


 This list presents the 217 construction completed sites In alphabetical order by state. The site name, location, and type of site is provided.
 Hawaii, Nebraska, Nevada, Wyoming, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands have no sites on the construction completion list.
Alabama
    Mowbray Engineering Co., Greenville; manufacturing plant
    Pcrdido Groundwater Contamination Site, Perdido; wells
    Triana/Tennessee River, Limestone; waterways

Alaska
    Alaskan Battery Enterprises, Fairbanks; industrial waste

American Samoa
    Taputimu Farm, Island Of Tutuila; organic wastes
   Arkansas
       Cecil Lindsey, Newport; landfill
       Industrial Waste Control, Fort Smith; industrial waste
       Mid-South Wood Products, Mena; manufacturing plant

   Arizona
       Mountain View Mobile Homes, Globe; asbestos mill tailings

   California
       Advanced Micro Devices #915, Sunnyvale; manufacturing plant
       Advanced Micro Devices Inc., Sunnyvale; manufacturing plant

-------
    Applied Materials, Santa Clara; manufacturing plant
    Beckman Instruments (Porterville), Porterville; manufacturing
        plant
    Celtor Chemical Works, Hoopa; mines/tailings
    CTS Printex, Moimtain View; manufacturing plant
    Del Norte Pesticide Storage, Crescent City; groundwater
    Fairchild Semiconductor (SSJ), South San Jose; manufacturing
        plant
    Firestone Tire (Salinas Plant), Salinas; manufacturing plant
    Intel Corp. (Santa Clara HI), Santa Clara; manufacturing plant
    Intersil, Cupertino; manufacturing plant
    Jibboom Junkyard, Sacramento; landfill
    Micro Storage/Intel Magnetics, Santa Clara; manufacturing
        plant
    Sola Optical USA Inc.,  Petaluma; manufacturing plant
    Spectra Physics, Inc., Mountain View; manufacturing plant
    Synertek (Building #1), Sunnyvale; manufacturing plant
    Teledyne Semiconductor, Mountain View; manufacturing plant
    TRW Microwave, MC (Building 825), Sunnyvale;
        manufacturing plant

Colorado
    Marshall Landfill, Boulder; landfill
    Woodbury Chemical Co., Commerce City; chemical plant

Connecticut
    Revere Textile Prints Corp., Sterling; manufacturing plant

Delaware
    Coker's Sanitation Service Landfills, Cheswold; landfill
    New Castle Spill Site, New Castle County; industrial waste
    New Castle Steel Plant, New Castle County; manufacturing
        plant
    Sealand Ltd., Mt.  Pleasant; industrial waste
    Wildcat Landfill, Dover; landfill

Florida
    Alpha Chemical Corp.,  Lakeland; chemical plant
    Beulah Landfill, Pensacola; landfill
    Brown Wood Preserving, Live Oak; manufacturing plant
    Chem-Form Inc., Pompano Beach; manufacturing plant
    Gold Coast Oil Corp., Miami; industrial waste
    Hollingsworth Solderless Term Co., Fort Lauderdale; manufac-
        turing plant
    Miami Drum Services, Miami; industrial waste
    Parramore Surplus, Mount Pleasant; industrial waste
    Peppers Steel & Alloys, Medley; manufacturing plant
    Pioneer Sand Co., Pensacola; industrial waste
    Tri-City Oil Conservationist Corp., Tampa; chemical plant
    Varsol Spill Site, Miami; wells
    Wilson Concepts of Florida, Pompano Beach; manufacturing
        plant
    Woodbury Chemical Co., Princeton; chemical plant
Georgia
    Luminous Processes, Athens; radioactive waste
    Monsanto Corp. (Augusta Plant), Augusta; industrial waste
    Powersville Landfill, Powersville; landfill

Guam
    Ordot Landfill, Ordot; landfill

Idaho
    Arrcom Corp. (Drexler Enterprise Inc.), Rathdrum; industrial
         waste

Illinois
    A & F Materials Reclaiming Inc., Greenup; groundwater
    Belvidere Municipal Landfill #1, Belvidere; landfill
    Johns Manville, Waukegan; manufacturing plant
    Petersen Sand & Gravel, Libertyville; industrial waste

Indiana
    IMC Terre Haute East Plant, Terre Haute; manufacturing plant
    Poer Farm, Jackson Township; industrial waste
    Seymour Recycling Corp., Seymour; industrial waste
    Tri-State Plating, Columbus; manufacturing plant
    Wedzeb Enterprises Inc., Lebanon; manufacturing plant

Iowa
    Aidex Corp., Council Bluffs; chemical plant
    El Dupont De Nemours & Co Inc., West Point; industrial waste
    John  Deere (Ottumwa Works Landfill), Ottumwa; landfill
    Labounty Site, Charles City; landfill
    Lawrence Todtz Farm, Camanche; landfill

Kansas
    Arkansas City Dump, Arkansas City; landfill
    Big River Sand Co., Wichita; inorganic waste
    Hydro-Flex Inc., Topeka; manufacturing waste
    Johns Sludge Pond, Wichita; lagoons

Kentucky
    A. L. Taylor (Valley Of Drums), Shepherdsville; industrial
         waste
    Distler Farm, Louisville; industrial waste
    Lees  Lane Landfill, Louisville; landfill
    Newport Dump, Wilders; landfill

Louisiana
    Bayou Sorrel Site, Bayou Sorrel; industrial waste

Maine
    McKin Co., Gray; industrial waste
    Saco  Tannery Waste Pits, Saco; lagoons

-------
Maryland
    Chemical Metals Industries, Baltimore; landfill
    Mid-Atlantic Wood Preservers, Harmons; manufacturing plant
    Middletown Road Dump Site, Annapolis; industrial waste

Massachusetts
    Cannon Engineering Corp., Bridgewater; industrial waste
    Plymouth Harbor/Cannon Engineering, Plymouth; industrial
         waste

Michigan
    American Anodco Inc., Ionia; manufacturing plant
    Anderson Development Co., Adian; chemical plant
    Burrows Sanitation, Hartford Township; lagoons
    Cemetery Dump Site, Rose Township; landfill
    Charlevoix Municipal Well Field, Charlevoix; wells
    Grand Traverse Overall Supply Co., Traverse City;
         manufacturing plant
    Gratiot County Golf Course, St. Louis; chemical plant
    Hedblum Industries, Oscoda; manufacturing plant
    Mason County Landfill, Pere Marquette Township; landfill
    Metal Working  Shop, Lake Ann; manufacturing plant
    Novaco Industries, Temperance; chemical plant
    US Aviex, Niles; chemical plant
    Velsicol Chemical, St. Louis; chemical plant
    Whitehall Municipal Wells, Whitehall; wells

Minnesota
    Adrian Municipal Well Field, Adrian; wells
    Boise Cascade/Onan/Medtronics, Fridley; manufacturing plant
    FMC Corp., Fridley; manufacturing plant
    General Mills/Henkel Corp., Minneapolis; chemical plant
    LcHillier/Mankato Site, Mankato; wells
    Morris Arsenic Dump Site, Morris; industrial waste
    Nutting Truck & Caster Co., Faribault; manufacturing plant
    Oak Grove Sanitary Landfill, Oak Grove Township; landfill
    Twin Cities AF Reserve (San. Landfill), Minneapolis; landfill
    Union Scrap Iron Metal, Minneapolis; manufacturing plant
    Washington County Landfill, Lake Elmo; landfill
    Whittaker Corp., Minneapolis; chemical plant
    Windom Muni Dump, Windom; landfill

Mississippi
    Flowood Site, Flowood; manufacturing plant
    Walcotte Chemical Co. Warehouses, Greenville; chemical plant

Missouri
    Conservation Chemical Co.,  Kansas City; landfill
    Fulbright Landfill, Springfield; landfill
    North-U Drive Well Contamination Site, Springfield;
         groundwater
Montana
    Libby Groundwater Contamination, Libby; wells

New Hampshire
    Kearsarge Metallurgical Corp., Conway; manufacturing plant
    Keefe Environmental Services, Epping; lagoons
    Mottolo Pig Farm, Raymond; housing area
    Sylvester's, Nashua; industrial waste
    Town Garage/Radio Beacon Site, Londonderry; wells

New Jersey
    Beachwood/Berkeley Wells, Berkeley Township; wells
    Combe Fill North Landfill, Chester Township; landfill
    Cooper Road Site, Vorhees Township;  industrial waste
    Friedman Property, Upper Freehold; industrial waste
    Goose Farm, Plumsted Township; industrial waste
    Helen Kramer Landfill, Mantua Township; landfill
    Krysowaty Farm, Hillsborough Township; industrial waste
    Lodi Municipal Wells, Lodi; groundwater
    M & T Delisa Landfill, Ocean Township; landfill
    Monroe Township Landfill, Monroe Township; landfill
    Pomona Oaks Well Contamination Site, Galloway Township;
        groundwater
    Ringwood Mines/Landfill, Ringwood; landfill
    Tabernacle Drum Dump, Tabernacle Township; industrial waste
    Upper Deerfield Township Sanitary Landfill, Upper Deerfield
        Township; landfill
    Vineland State School, Vineland; chemical plant
    Wilson Farm, Plumsted Township; industrial waste
    Witco Chemical Corp. (Oakland Plant), Oakland; chemical plant

New Mexico
    Cimarron Mining Corp., Carrizozo; mines/tailings
    Pagano Salvage, Los Lunas; mines/tailings

New York
    Action Anodizing, Plating & Polishing Co., Capoiague;
        industrial waste
    BEC Trucking, Vestal; manufacturing plant
    Bioclinical Laboratories Inc.,  Bohemia; chemical plant
    C & J Disposal Site, Hamilton; industrial waste
    Clothier Disposal, Granby; industrial waste
    Katonah Municipal Well, Bedford; wells
    Suffern Village Well Field, Suffern; groundwater
    Tronic Plating Co. Inc., Farmingdale; manufacturing plant
    Wide Beach Development, Brant;  industrial waste

North Carolina
    Celanese Corp. Shelby Fiber Operations, Shelby; chemical plant
    Chemtronics Inc., Swannanoa; industrial waste
    PCB Spills, Roanoke Rapids; industrial waste

-------
North Dakota
    Arsenic Trioxide Site, Lidgerwood; groundwater

Ohio
    Bower's Landfill, Circleville; lagoons
    Chem-Dyne Corp., Hamilton; industrial waste
    Chemical & Minerals Reclamation, Cleveland; industrial waste
    EH Schilling Landfill, Ironton; landfill
    Laskin/Poplar Oil, Jefferson; industrial waste
    New Lyme Landfill, New Lyme; landfill
    Old Mill, Rock Creek; industrial waste
    Republic Steel Quarry, Elyria; industrial waste

Oklahoma
    Compass Industries (Avery Drive), Tulsa; landfill

Oregon
    Allied Plating Inc., Portland; manufacturing plant
    Joseph Forest Products, Joseph; manufacturing plant
    United Chrome Products Inc., Corvallis; manufacturing plant

Pennsylvania
    Ambler Asbestos Piles, Ambler; mines/tailings
    Bruin Lagoon, Bruin Borough; lagoons
    Enterprise Avenue, Philadelphia; landfill
    Henderson Road Site, Upper Merion; chemical plant
    Kimberton Site, Borough of Kimberton; chemical plant
    Lansdowne Radiation Site, Landsome; radioactive waste
    Lehigh Electric & Engineering Co., Old Forge; manufacturing
         plant
    Presque Isle, Erie; industrial waste
    Reeser's Landfill, Upper Macungie Township; landfill
    Route 940 Drum Dump, Tobyanna Township; landfill
    Taylor Borough Dump, Taylor; landfill
    Voortman Farm, Ladark; waste disposal facility
    Wade (ABM), Chester City; industrial waste
    Westline Site, Westline; lagoons

Rhode Island
    Western Sand & Gravel, South Kensington; lagoons

South Carolina
    Independent Nail Co., Beaufort; lagoons
    SCRDI Dixiana, Cayce; industrial waste

South Dakota
    Whitewood Creek, Whitewood; mines/tailings

Tennessee
    Amnicola Dump, Chattanooga; industrial waste
    Lewisburg Dump, Lewisburg; industrial waste
Texas
    Bio-Ecology Systems, Inc., Grand Prairie; industrial waste
    Crystal City Airport, Crystal City; chemical spills
    Dixie Oil Processors, Inc., Friendswood; industrial waste
    Geneva Industries/Fuhrmann Energy, Houston; chemical plant
    Harris (Farley Street), Houston; landfill
    Highlands Acid Pit, Highlands; chemical plant
    Pesses Chemical Co., Fort Worth; manufacturing plant
    Sol Lynn/Industrial Transformers, Houston; manufacturing plant
    Stewco, Inc., Waskom; lagoons
    Triangle Chemical Co., Bridge City; chemical plant

Trust Territories
    PCB Warehouse, Saipan Island; industrial waste
    PCB Wastes Site, Majuro Island; industrial waste

Utah
    Rose Park Sludge Pit, Salt Lake City; industrial waste

Vermont
    Darling Hill Dump, Lyndon; industrial waste

Virginia
    C & R Battery Co. Inc.,  Richmond; battery disposal
    Chisman Creek, Seaford; industrial waste
    Matthews Electric Plating, Roanoke; industrial waste
    Suffolk City Landfill, Suffolk; landfill

Washington
    FMC Corp. Yakima Pit, Yakima; chemical plant
    Lakewood Site, Lake wood; chemical
    Northside Landfill, Spokane; landfill
    Pesticide Lab - Yakima, Yakima; chemical plant
    Silver Mountain Mine, Loomis; mines/tailings
    Toftdahl Drum Site, Brush Prairie; industrial waste
    Western Processing Co. Inc., Kent; industrial waste
    Yakima Plating Co., Yakima; manufacturing

West Virginia
    Leetown Pesticide, Leetown; industrial plant

Wisconsin
    Eau Claire Municipal Well Field, Eau Claire; wells
    Northern Engraving Co., Sparta; manufacturing plant
    Schmalz Dump, Harrison; landfill
    Wheeler Pit, Jonesville; landfill

-------