United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Publication 9320.7-051
Solid Waste and February 1992
Emergency Response
Supplementary Materials
National Priorities List,
Proposed Rule
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
Hazardous Site Evaluation Division (OS-230)
Intermittent Bulletin
Volume 2, Number 1
The National Priorities List (NPL) informs the
public of uncontrolled hazardous waste sites that
warrant further investigation to determine if they pose
risks to public health or the environment. Such sites
are eligible for long-term "remedial action" financed
under the Trust Fund established by the
Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA)
as amended by the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA). In October
Table of Contents
How Sites Are Placed on the NPL 2
Statutory Requirements and Listing Policies 3
NPL Status (February 1992) 3
Key Dates in Superfund 5
Deleting Sites From Final NPL 6
Construction Completion Category of Final NPL 7
Removing Proposed Sites 7
Lists and Data Summaries 9
Federal Facility Sites (by State) 11
Proposed Sites (by State) 15
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPL 18
NPL Sites Per State/Territory (by Total Sites) 23
NPL Sites Per EPA Region 24
Federal Register Notices 26
-------
1990, CERCLA was extended to September 30,
1994. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) has the primary responsibility, for managing
the Superfund program. EPA's goals for the
Superfund program are to:
Ensure that polluters pay to clean up the
problems they created
Work first on the worst problems at the worst
sites:
-- make sites safe by controlling acute
threats to people and the environment
make sites clean by achieving long-term
cleanup goals
use technology to remove contamination
from the environment by, for example,
pumping and treating polluted ground
water
HOW SITES ARE PLACED ON THE NPL
EPA uses informal rulemaking to place sites on
the NPL. Sites are first proposed to the NPL in the
Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments
on the sites (typically for 60 days), responds to the
comments, and finally places on the NPL those sites
that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Section 300.425(c) of the National Contingency
Plan (NCP), the Federal regulation by which
CERCLA is implemented (55FR 8845, March 8,
1990), provides three mechanisms for placing sites on
the NPL. The primary mechanism is EPA's Hazard
Ranking System (HRS). The original HRS,
developed in 1982, evaluated the relative threat a site
poses to human health or the environment over five
"pathways," or routes of exposure. The HRS score
was based on the evaluation of three pathways
through which contaminants can migrate: ground
water, surface water, and air. The other two
pathways, direct contact and fire/explosion, were
evaluated to determine the need for immediate
removal (emergency) action. HRS scores ranged
from 0 to 100. An HRS score of 28.50 was selected
as the cutoff point for the first proposed NPL to
identify at least 400 sites, the minimum specified by
CERCLA.
EPA has now revised the HRS, as required by
SARA. The revised HRS was promulgated on
December 14, 1990 (55FR 51532) and became
effective on March 14, 1991. It is a more
comprehensive and accurate scoring system than the
original HRS and may add new types of sites to the
NPL.
The revised HRS retains the same cutoff score
and basic approach as the original HRS, while
incorporating SARA requirements as well as
improvements identified as necessary by EPA and the
public. The revised HRS retains the ground water,
surface water, and air pathways, drops the direct
contact and fire/explosion pathways, and adds a
fourth pathway, soil exposure. All four are used to
calculate the site score.
The second mechanism for placing sites on the
NPL allows States or Territories to designate one top-
priority site regardless of score. Of the 57 States and
Territories, 38 have designated top-priority sites. Six
of these sites have been deleted from the NPL
because no further response was necessary.
The third mechanism allows listing a site if it
meets all three of these requirements:
The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease
Registry (ATSDR) of the U.S. Public Health
Service has issued a health advisory that
recommends removing people from the site.
EPA determines the site poses a significant
threat to public health.
EPA anticipates it will be more cost-effective
to use its remedial authority (available only at
NPL sites) than to use its emergency removal
authority to respond to the site.
Six sites have been proposed to the NPL on the
basis of ATSDR advisories:
Three are on the NPL: Forest Glen Mobile
Home Subdivision, Niagara Falls, NY, and
Radium Chemical Co., Inc., New York City,
NY (54 FR 48184, November 21, 1989); and
White Chemical Corp., Newark NJ (56 FR
35840, September 29, 1991).
-------
One has been deleted from the NPL because
all appropriate response has been completed:
Lansdowne Radiation Site, Lansdowne, PA (56
FR 46121, September 10, 1991).
One site is being proposed to the NPL in early
February 1992: Austin Avenue Radiation Site,
Delaware County, PA
One, Quail Run Mobile Manor, Gray Summit,
. MO, was proposed on September 8, 1983 (48
FR 40674) but was dropped from further
consideration on February 11, 1991 (56 FR
5598). Because of an EPA removal action,
ATSDR had rescinded its health advisory.
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
AND LISTING POLICIES
CERCLA restricts EPA's authority to respond
to certain sites by expressly excluding some
substances petroleum, for example from the
definition of "release." In addition, as a matter of
policy,1 EPA may choose not to use CERCLA
because the Federal government can undertake or
enforce cleanup under other laws, thus preserving
CERCLA funds for sites not covered by other laws.
EPA has chosen not to use CERCLA for certain
types of sites regulated by Subtitle C of the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). However,
if EPA later determines that sites not listed as a
matter of policy are not being properly responded to,
it may consider placing them on the NPL.
RCRA-Related Sites
When the first final NPL was promulgated in
September 1983, EPA announced certain listing
policies relating to sites that might qualify for the
NPL. One of these policies involved facilities subject
to RCRA Subtitle C. EPA's policy was generally not
to place on the NPL, RCRA "regulated units" (for
example, land disposal units that received hazardous
waste after the effective date of the RCRA land
disposal regulations) because EPA can require the
owner/operator to clean them up under RCRA. The
RCRA cleanup process and standards are similar to
those under CERCLA, ensuring that all actions taken
will protect human health and the environment.
NPL Status (February 1992)
Sites on final NPL
General Superfund Section
Federal Facilities Section
Sites remaining on proposed NPL
General Superfund Section
* Federal Facilities Section
Sites deleted from final NPL
Sites in Construction Completion
category of final NPL
Sites dropped from proposed NPL
Policy issues (e.g. RCRA)
HRS score below 28.50
(1,067)
(116)
(43)
(9)
1,183
1,235
65
25
( all in Qanera) \
\Suparfund Section
(43)
(36)
-------
In November 1984, the Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments (HSWA) to RCRA were enacted,
expanding EPA's authority to require corrective
measures under Subtitle C. As a result of this
broadened RCRA authority, EPA revised its policy
for placing non-Federal RCRA-regulated sites on the
NPL, and on June 10, 1986 (54 FR 21057)
announced that facilities subject to RCRA Subtitle C
corrective action authorities would be placed on the
NPL if one or more of these conditions exist:
The facilities are owned by persons who have
demonstrated an inability to finance
appropriate corrective action by invoking
bankruptcy laws.
The facilities have lost authorization to operate
(also known as the Loss of Interim Status, or
LOIS provision), and there are additional
indications that the owner or operator is
unwilling to undertake corrective action.
The facilities have not lost authorization to
operate but have a clear history of
unwillingness to undertake corrective action.
These situations are determined on a case-by-
case basis.
On June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23978) and October
9, 1989 (54 FR 41000), EPA announced additional
components of the NPL/RCRA policy. As a matter
of policy, EPA will list four additional categories of
RCRA-related sites:
Facilities that were treating, storing, or
disposing of Subtitle C hazardous waste after
November 19, 1980, but that did not file a
"Part A," the initial part of the permit
application, by that date as required and have
little or no history of compliance with RCRA.
EPA believes that these non- or late filers,
although they are technically subject to RCRA,
are not likely to be cleaned up expeditiously
under RCRA and so should be on the NPL.
However, if such facilities have complied with
RCRA, EPA may consider whether listing is
necessary.
Facilities with permits for the treatment,
storage, or disposal of hazardous waste issued
before enactment of HSWA, and whose
owners/operators will not voluntarily modify the
permit. Pre-HSWA permittees are not required to
take corrective action for releases. Under RCRA
Section 3004(u), EPA does not have the authority to
modify a pre-HSWA permit for corrective action
until the permit is reissued. Many pre-HSWA
permits are for 10 years. Since the last pre-HSWA
permit was issued prior to November 8, 1984, it
could be 1994 before EPA could modify some
permits to include corrective action. In these cases,
EPA believes CERCLA authorities will result in the
most expeditious cleanup.
Facilities that filed a Part A permit application
for treatment, storage, or disposal of Subtitle
C hazardous waste as a precautionary measure
only. Such facilities for example,
generators, transporters, or recyclers of
hazardous waste - are not subject to Subtitle
C corrective action authorities. These are
referred to as protective filers.
Facilities that at one time treated or stored
Subtitle C hazardous waste but have since
converted to generator-only status (i.e.,
facilities that now store hazardous waste for 90
days or less) or any other hazardous waste
activity not requiring Interim Status. These
facilities, whose Part A permit applications
have been withdrawn with EPA or State
approval, are referred to as converters. EPA
believes it has the authority under RCRA
Section 3008(u) to compel corrective action at
such facilities. However, RCRA's corrective
action program currently focuses primarily on
treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (due
to permitting deadlines in RCRA). Therefore,
this category should be on the NPL to ensure
expeditious cleanup. However, if a consent
order requiring remedial action is an effect, a
converter need not be listed.
Federal Facility Sites
CERCLA Section 120(a) requires that Federal
facilities be subject to and comply with CERCLA in
the same manner as any nongovernmental entity.
CERCLA Section lll(e)(3), however, generally
prohibits use of the Trust Fund for remedial actions
at Federally owned facilities. Thus, Federal agencies
must use their own funds for cleanup.
-------
Key Dates in Superfund
Legislation
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA) enacted December 11, 1980; Trust Fund of $1.6
billion authorized over 5 years
CERCLA amended by Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization
Act (SARA) enacted October 17, 1986; Trust Fund of $8.5 billion
authorized over 5 years
CERCLA extended to September 30, 1994; an additional $5.1 billion
authorized
Federal regulation implementing Superfund: National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP)
Revised March 8,1990 (55 FR 8666) in response to CERCLA Section
105, amended by SARA
Hazard Ranking System
Promulgated July 16, 1982 (47 FR 31180) as Appendix A of the NCP
Revised December 14, 1990 (55 FR 51 532) in response to CERCLA
Section 105(c), added by SARA; effective date March 14, 1991
National Priorities List
Promulgated September 8,1983 (48 FR 40658) as Appendix B of the
NCP
Updated at least annually
Last sites proposed under original HRS promulgated February 11,
1991 (56 FR 5598); Construction Completion category activated
First sites proposed under revised HRS July 29, 1991 (56 FR 35840)
-------
Because most Federal facilities have RCRA-
regulated units within their boundaries, EPA
determined that a separate NPL/RCRA policy should
be adopted for Federal facilities. As a result, on
March 13, 1989 (54 FR 10520), EPA announced it
would place on the NPL those sites located on
Federally owned or operated facilities that meet the
NPL eligibility requirements ~ e.g., HRS scores of
28.50 or greater even if the Federal facility also is
subject to the corrective action authorities of RCRA
Subtitle C. Cleanup, if appropriate, could then
proceed at those sites under either CERCLA or
RCRA. The policy is based on several
considerations:
Congress clearly intended that Federal facility
sites should be on the NPL.
Strict application of the non-Federal
NPL/RCRA policy would exclude virtually all
Federal facility sites from the NPL because
they would not likely meet any of the criteria
necessary for listing (inability to pay as
evidenced by invocation of bankruptcy laws or
demonstrated unwillingness to comply with
RCRA).
Placing RCRA-regulated Federal sites on the
NPL serves the primary purpose of listing
Federal facility sites to advise the public of the
status of Federal government cleanup efforts.
Listing these sites helps Federal agencies set
priorities and focus cleanup efforts on those
sites that present the most serious problem.
Radioactive Release Sites
CERCLA Section 101(22) excludes several
types of releases of radioactive materials from the
statutory definition of "release." These releases are
therefore not eligible for CERCLA response actions
or the NPL. The exclusions apply to (1) releases of
source, by-product, or special nuclear material from
a nuclear incident if these releases are subject to
financial protection requirements under Section 170
of the Atomic Energy Act, and (2) any releases of
source, by-product, or special nuclear material from
any processing site designated under the Uranium
Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978.
Accordingly, such radioactive releases have not been
considered eligible for the NPL.
As a policy matter, EPA has also chosen not
to list releases of source, by-product, or special
nuclear material from any facility with a current
license issued by the NRC, on the grounds that the
NRC has full authority to require cleanup of releases
from such facilities. EPA will, however, list releases
from facilities that hold a current license issued by a
State pursuant to an agreement between the State and
the NRC under Section 274 of the Atomic Energy
Act. Facilities whose licenses are no longer in effect
are also considered for listing.
DELETING SITES FROM FINAL NPL
EPA may delete a final NPL site if it
determines that no further response is required to
protect human health or the environment. Under
Section 300.425(e) of the NCP (55 FR 8845, March
8, 1990), a site may be deleted where no further
response is appropriate if EPA determines that one of
the following criteria has been met:
EPA, in conjunction with the State, has
determined that responsible or other parties
have implemented all appropriate response
action required.
EPA, in consultation with the State, has
determined that all appropriate Superfund-
financed response under CERCLA has been
implemented, and that no further response by
responsible parties is appropriate.
A remedial investigation has shown that the
release poses no significant threat to public
health or the environment, and, therefore,
remedial measures are not appropriate.
Since 1986, EPA has followed
procedures for deleting a site from the NPL:
these
The Regional Administrator approves a "close-
out report" which establishes that all
appropriate response action has been taken or
that no action is required.
The Regional Office obtains State concurrence.
-------
EPA publishes a notice of intent to delete in
the Federal Register and in a major newspaper
near the community involved. A public
comment period is provided.
EPA responds to the comments and, if the site
continues to warrant deletion, publishes a
deletion notice in the Federal Register.
Sites that have been deleted from the NPL
remain eligible for further Superfund-financed
remedial action in the unlikely event that conditions
in the future warrant such action.
As of January 1992, 40 sites have been deleted
from the NPL, all in the General Superfund Section.
CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION
CATEGORY OF FINAL NPL
The preamble to the revised NCP (55 FR
8699, March 8, 1990) announced EPA's intention to
create "Construction Completion" as a new category
of the final NPL to better communicate to the public
the status of cleanup progress at NPL sites. EPA
activated the Construction Completion category of the
NPL on February 11, 1991 (56 FR 5634) by
identifying 14 sites that have satisfied the
requirements for listing in this category. EPA had
approved Interim or Final Close-Out Reports for each
site. The Close-Out Report provides a brief
demonstration of how the implemented remedy at the
site satisfies the technical and other requirements.
Originally, the category consisted of:
Sites awaiting deletion.
Sites awaiting the first 5-year review after the
remedial action was completed.
Sites undergoing long-term remedial action -
for example, pumping and treatment of
contaminated ground water until cleanup levels
are achieved.
On December 24, 1991 (56 FR 66601), EPA
announced it would no longer place sites awaiting 5-
year review in the Construction Completion category.
On the basis of subsequent experience and analysis,
EPA has determined that tying these two independent
processes (5-year review and deletion) is unnecessary
and potentially confusing.
As of January 1992, 25 sites are in the
Construction Completion category, all in the General
Superfund Section.
REMOVING PROPOSED SITES
As of early February 1992, 79 sites (see page
18) have been proposed for the NPL but subsequently
removed from further consideration, most of them
because their final HRS scores were below the 28.50
cutoff or they are subject to RCRA Subtitle C. Three
of the sites were reproposed in February 1992 after
being rescored with the revised HRS.
-------
LISTS AND DATA SUMMARIES
-------
10
-------
National Priorities List,
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
February 1992
st
AK
AK
AK
AK
AL
AL
AZ
AZ
AZ
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CO
CO
CO
Site Nam
Eielson Air Force Base
Elmendorf Air Force Base
Fort Wainwright
Standard Steel & Metals Salvage Yard (USDOT)
4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4
Alabama Army Ammunition Plant
Amiston Army Depot (Southeast Industrial Area)
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
Luke Air Force Base
Williams Air Force Base
Yuma Marine Corps Air Station
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
Barstou Marine Corps Logistics Base
Camp Peddle ton Marine Corps Base
Castle Air Force Base
Concord Naval Weapons Station
Edwards Air Force Base
El Toro Marine Corps Air Station
Fort Ord
George Air Force Base
Jet Propulsion Laboratory (NASA)
Lawrence Liver-more National Laboratory (USOQE)
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (Site 300)
(USOOE)
March Air Force Base
Mather Air Force Base (once listed as Mather Air Force
Base (AC&W Disposal Site))
McClellan Air Force Base (Ground Water Contamination)
Moffett Naval Air Station
Norton Air Force Base
River-bank Army Ammunition Plant
Sacramento Army Depot
Sharpe Army Depot
Tracy Defense Depot
Travis Air Force Base
Treasure Island Naval Station- Hunters Point Annex
20 Final + 2 Proposed = 22
Air Force Plant PJKS
Rocky Flats Plant (USDOE)
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
City/County
Fairbanks N Star Bor
Greater Anchorage Bo
Fairbanks N Star Bor
Anchorage
Childersburg
Amiston
Glendale
Chandler
Yuma
Barstou
San Diego County
Merced
Concord
Kern County
El Toro
Marina
Victorville
Pasadena
Livermore
Livermore
Riverside
Sacramento
Sacramento
Sunnyvale
San Bernardino
Riverbank
Sacramento
Lathrop
Tracy
Solano County
San Francisco
Waterton
Golden
Adams County
Oat
Proposed
7/89
7/89
7/89
7/89
10/84
10/84
7/89
7/89
6/88
7/89
7/89
10/84
2/92
7/89
6/88
7/89
7/89
2/92
10/84
7/89
.7/89
10/84
10/84
4/85
10/84
6/88
10/84
10/84
7/89
7/89
7/89
7/89
10/84
10/84
:e
Final
11/89
8/90
8/90
8/90
7/87
3/89
8/90
11/89
2/90
11/89
11/89
7/87
8/90
2/90
2/90
2/90
7/87
8/90
11/89
11/89
7/87
7/87
7/87
2/90
7/87
7/87
8/90
11/89
11/89
11/89
10/89
7/87
3 Final + 0 Proposed - 3
CT New London Submarine Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
DE Dover Air Force Base
1 Final * 0 Proposed = 1
FL Cecil Field Naval Air Station
FL Homestead Air Force Base
FL Jacksonville Naval Air Station
FL Pensacola Naval Air Station
4 Final + 0 Proposed a 4
New London
Dover
Jacksonvi I le
Homestead
Jacksonville
Pensacola
10/89 8/90
10/84 3/89
7/89
7/89
7/89
7/89
11/89
8/90
11/89
11/89
11
-------
National Priorities List,
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
February 1992
St Site Name
City/County
Date
Proposed Final
GA Marine Corps Logistics Base
GA Robins Air Force Base (Landfill #4/Sludge Lagoon)
(once listed as Robins Air Force Base)
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
GU Andersen Air Force Base
0 Final + 1 Proposed 1
HI Pearl Harbor Naval Complex
HI Schofield Barracks
1 Final + 1 Proposed * 2
IA Iowa Army Ammunition Plant
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
ID Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (USOOE)
ID Mountain Home Air Force Base
2 Final + 0 Proposed » 2
IL Joliet Army Ammunition Plant (Load-Assembly-Packing
Area)
IL Joliet Army Ammunition Plant (Manufacturing Area)
IL Sangamo Electric Dump/Crab Orchard National Wildlife
Refuge (USDOI)
IL Savanna Army Depot Activity
4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4
KS Fort Riley
1 Final + 0 Proposed - 1
LA Louisiana Army Ammunition Plant
1 Final * 0 Proposed = 1
MA Fort Devens
MA Fort Devens-Sudbury Training Annex
MA Otis Air National Guard Base/Camp Edwards
3 Final + 0 Proposed » 3
MO Aberdeen Proving Ground (Edgewood Area)
MD Aberdeen Proving Ground (Michaelsville Landfill)
2 Final + 0 Proposed * 2
ME Brunswick Naval Air Station
ME Loring Air Force Base
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
MN Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant
MN Twin Cities Air Force Reserve Base (Small Arms Range
Landfill)
2 Final + 0 Proposed * 2
MO Lake City Army Ammunition Plant (Northwest Lagoon)
Albany
Houston County
Yigo
Pearl Harbor
Oahu
Middletown
Idaho Falls
Mountain Home
Joliet
Joliet
CarterviIle
Savanna
Junction City
Doyline
Fort Devens
Middlesex County
Falmouth
Fridley
Minneapolis
Independence
7/89 11/89
10/84 7/87
2/92
7/91
7/89
8/90
7/89 8/90
7/89
7/89
11/89
8/90
4/85 3/89
10/84
10/84
7/87
7/87
10/84 3/89
7/89 8/90
10/84 3/89
7/89
7/89
7/89
11/89
2/90
11/89
Edgewood
Aberdeen
Brunswick
Limestone
4/85
4/85
10/84
7/89
2/90
10/89
7/87
2/90
7/89
1/87
11/89
7/87
10/84 7/87
12
-------
National Priorities List,
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
February 1992
St Site Name
City/County
Date
Proposed Final
MO WeIdon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pits (USOOE/Army) (once
listed as WeI don Spring Quarry (USOOE/Army))
NO WeIdon Spring Former Army Ordnance Works
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
NC Camp Lejeune Military Reservation (once listed as Camp
Lejeune Marine Corps Base)
1 Final + 0 Proposed * 1
NE Cornhusker Army Ammunition Plant
1 Final + 0 Proposed « 1
NH Pease Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
NJ Federal Aviation Administration Technical Center
(USOOT)
NJ Fort Oix (Landfill Site)
NJ Naval Air Engineering Center
NJ Naval Weapons Station Earle (Site A)
NJ Picatirmy Arsenal
NJ W.R. Grace & Co., Inc./Wayne Interim Storage Site
(USOOE) (once listed as W.R. Grace & Co., Inc. (Wayne
Plant)
6 Final + 0 Proposed = 6
NM Cal West Metals (USS8A)
NM Lee Acres Landfill (USOOI)
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
NY Brookhaven National Laboratory (USOOE)
NY Griffiss Air Force Base
NY Pittsburgh Air Force Base
NY Seneca Army Depot
4 Final + 0 Proposed « 4
OH Feed Materials Production Center (USOOE)
OH Mound Plant (USOOE)
OH Wright-Patterson Air Force Base
3 Final * 0 Proposed * 3
OK Tinker Air Force Base (Soldier Creek/Building 3001)
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
OR Umatilla Army Depot (Lagoons)
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
PA Letterkemy Army Depot (Property Disposal Office Area)
PA Letterkemy Army Depot (Southeast Area)
PA Naval Air Development Center (8 Waste Areas)
PA Tobyharma Army Depot
4 Final * 0 Proposed » 4
St.Charles County 10/84 7/87
St. Charles County 7/89 2/90
Onslow County
Hall County
Portsmouth/Newington
Atlantic County
Pemberton Township
Lakehurst
Colts Neck
Rockauay Township
Wayne Township
Lemitar
Farmington
Oklahoma City
Hermiston
Franklin County
Chambersburg
Warminster Township
Tobyhama
6/88 10/89
10/84 7/87
7/89 2/90
7/89 8/90
10/84 7/87
9/85 7/87
10/84 8/90
7/89 2/90
9/83 9/84
6/88
6/88
3/89
8/90
Upton
Rome
Pittsburgh
Romulus
Fernald
Miamisburg
Dayton
7/89
10/84
7/89
7/89
7/89
7/89
6/88
11/89
7/87
11/89
8/90
11/89
11/89
10/89
4/85 7/87
10/84 7/87
4/85
10/84
6/86
7/89
3/89
7/87
10/89
8/90
13
-------
National Priorities List,
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
February 1992
St Site Name
City/County
Date
Proposed Final
PR Naval Security Group Activity
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
RI Davisville Naval Construction Battalion Center
RI Newport Naval Education & Training Center
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
SC Savannah River Site (USOOE)
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
SO Ellsworth Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed 3 1
TN Memphis Defense Depot
TN Milan Army Ammunition Plant
TN Oak Ridge Reservation (USOOE)
2 Final * 1 Proposed = 3
TX Air Force Plant #4 (General Dynamics)
TX Lone Star Army Ammunition Plant
TX Longhorn Army Ammunition Plant
TX Pantex Plant (USOOE)
3 Final + 1 Proposed = 4
UT Hill Air Force Base
UT Monticello Hill Tailings (USOOE)
UT Ogden Defense Depot
UT Tooete Army Depot (North Area)
4 Final * 0 Proposed = 4
VA Defense General Supply Center
VA Naval Surface Warfare Center - Dahlgren
VA Naval Weapons Station - Yorktown
1 Final + 2 Proposed = 3
WA Bangor Naval Submarine Base
WA Bangor Ordnance Disposal
WA Bormeville Power Adninistrati on Ross Complex (USOOE)
WA Fairchild Air Force Base (4 Waste Areas)
WA Fort Lewis (Landfill Mo. 5)
WA Fort Lewis Logistics Center
WA Hamilton Island Landfill (USA/COE)
WA Hanford 100-Area (USOOE)
WA Hanford 1100-Area (USOOE)
WA Hanford 200-Area (USOOE)
WA Hanford 300-Area (USOOE)
WA HcChord Air Force Base (Wash Rack/Treatment Area)
WA Naval Air Station, Whidbey Island (Ault Field)
WA Naval Air Station, Whidbey Island (Seaplane Base)
WA Naval Undersea Warfare Engineering Station (4 Waste
Areas)
14 Final + 1 Proposed * 15
WY F.E. Warren Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
116 Final » 9 Proposed = 125 Total Sites
Sabana Seca
North Kingstown
Newport
Aiken
Rapid City
Memphis
Milan
Oak Ridge
Fort Worth
Texarkana
Karnack
Pantex village
Ogden
Monticello
Ogden
Tooele
Chesterfield County
Dahlgren
Yorktown
Silverdale
Bremerton
Vancouver
Spokane County
Tacoma
Tillicun
North Bonneville
Benton County
Benton County
Benton County
Benton County
Tacoma
Whidbey Island
Whidbey Island
Keyport
Cheyenne
6/88 10/89
7/89
7/89
11/89
11/89
7/89 11/89
10/89 8/90
2/92
10/84
7/89
10/84
10/84
7/89
7/91
10/84
7/89
10/84
10/84
10/84
2/92
2/92
7/89
10/84
7/89
6/88
10/84
7/89
7/91
6/88
6/88
6/88
6/88
10/84
9/85
9/85
6/86
7/87
11/89
8/90
7/87
8/90
7/87
11/89
7/87
8/90
7/87
8/90
7/87
11/89
3/89
7/87
11/89
10/89
10/89
10/89
10/89
7/87
2/90
2/90
10/89
7/89 2/90
14
-------
National Priorities List,
General Superfund Section, Proposed Sites (by State)
February 1992
St Site Name
City/County
Notes
Alt Popile, Inc.
AR West Memphis Landfill
CA Cooper Drum Co.
CA Del Amo Facility
CA GBF, Inc., Dump
CA McCormick & Baxter Creosoting Co.
CA Stoker Company
CA Westminster Tract *2633
CO Smeltertown Site
FL Broward County--21st Manor Dump
FL Helena Chemical Co. (Tampa Plant)
FL Stauffer Chemical Co. (Tarpon Springs Plant)
FL Stauffer Chemical Co. (Tampa Plant)
IL Ottawa Radiation Areas
IN U.S. Smelter and Lead Refinery, Inc.
KS 57th and North Broadway Streets Site
KY National Electric Coil Co./Cooper Industries
KY National Southwire Aluminum Co.
LA American Creosote Works, Inc. (Winnfield Plant)
MA Blackburn & Union Privileges
MO Big River Mine Tailings/St. Joe Minerals Corp.
NC General Electric Co./Shepherd Farm
NE Cleburn Street Well
NE Sherwood Medical Co.
NH New Hampshire Plating Co.
NY Li Tungsten Corp.
OR Northwest Pipe & Casing Co.
PA Austin Avenue Radiation Site
PA Crater Resources, Inc./Keystone Coke Co./Alan Wood
Steel Co.
PA Crossley Far»
PA Foote Mineral Co.
PA Metropolitan Mirror and Glass Co., Inc.
PA Rodale Manufacturing Co., Inc.
RI West Kingston Town Oump/URI Disposal Area
SC Koppers Co., Inc. (Charleston Plant)
SO Annie Creek Mine Tailings
UT Petrochem Recycling Corp./Ekotek, Inc.
UT Richardson Flat Tailings
VI Tutu welt field
WA Moses Lake Wellfield Contamination
El Dorado
West Memphis
South Gate
Los Angeles
Antioch
Stockton
Imperial
Westminster
Salida
Fort Lauderdale
Tampa
Tarpon Springs
Tampa
Ottawa
East Chicago
Wichita Heights
Dayhoit
Hawesville
Winnfield
Walpole
Desloge
East Flat Rock
Grand Island
Norfolk
Merrimack
Glen Cove
Clackamas
Delaware County
Upper Herion Twp
Hereford Township
East Whiteland Twp
Frackville
Emmaus Borough
South Kingstown
Charleston
Lead
Salt Lake City
Summit County
Tutu
Moses Lake
15
-------
National Priorities List,
General Superfund Section, Proposed Sites (by State)
February 1992
St Site Name City/County Notes
WA
WA
UI
Tulalip Landfill
Vancouver Water Station #4 Contamination
Refuse Hideaway Landfill
Nunber of Sites Proposed in the General Superfund Section:
Marysville
Vancouver
Middleton
43
A * Based on issuance of health advisory by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
(if scored, HRS score need not be >28.50).
S = State top priority (if scored, HRS score need not be >28.50).
16
-------
National Priorities List,
Federal Facilities Section, Proposed Sites (by State)
January 1992
St Site Ma
City/County
Notes
CA Concord Naval Weapons Station
CA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (NASA)
GU Andersen Air Force Base
HI Pearl Harbor Naval Complex
TN Memphis Defense Depot
TX Pantex Plant (USDOE)
VA Naval Surface Warfare Center - Dahlgren
VA Naval Weapons Station - Yorktown
WA Hamilton Island Landfill (USA/COE)
Number of Sites Proposed in the Federal Facilities Section:
Concord
Pasadena
Yigo
Pearl Harbor
Memphis
Pantex Village
Dahlgren
Yorktown
North Bonneville
A = Based on issuance of health advisory by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
(if scored, HRS score need not be >28.50).
S = State top priority (if scored, HRS score need not be >28.50).
17
-------
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPL
February 1992
Date
St Site Name
AR Allen Transformer
AR Crittenden County Landfill
AR Magnolia City Landfill
AZ Kingman Airport Industrial Area
AZ Mesa Area Ground Water Contamination
CA Concord Naval Weapons Station
CA FMC Corp. (Fresno Plant)
CA GBF, Inc., Dump
CA Hewlett-Packard
CA IBM Corp. (San Jose Plant)
CA Kaiser Steel Corp.(Fontana Plant)
CA Kearney-KPF
CA Marley Cooling Tower Co.
CA Precision Monolithic, Inc.
CA Rhone-Poulenc, Inc./Zoecon Corp. (once listed as
Zoecon Corp. Rhone-Poulenc, Inc.)
CA Signetics, Inc.
CA Solvent Service, Inc.
CA Southern Pacific Transportation
CA Van Waters & Rogers, Inc.
City/County
Ft. Smith
Marion
Magnolia
Kingman
Mesa
Concord
Fresno
Antioch
Palo Alto
San Jose
Fontana
Stockton
Stockton
Santa Clara
East Palo Alto
Sunnyvale
San Jose
Roseville
San Jose
Proposed/
Announced
10/23/81
12/30/82
47FR $8476
10/26/89
54FR 43778
12/30/82
47FR 58476
6/10/86
51FR 21099
6/24/88
53FR 23988
10/15/84
49FR 40320
6/24/88
53FR 23988
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
6/24/88
53FR 23988
6/24/88
53FR 23988
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
6/24/88
53FR 23988
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
Removed
Score8
12/30/82C
47FR 58476
9/08/83
48FR 40658
8/30/90
55FR 35502
9/21/84d
49FR 37070
8/30/90
55FR 35502
10/04/89
54FR 41015
6/10/86
51 FR 21054
Other6
2/11/91
56FR 5598
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
S4FR 41000
8/30/90
55FR 35502
10/04/89
S4FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
8/30/90
55FR 35502
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
18
-------
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPi
February 1992
Date
Removed
St Site Name
CO Hartin-Marietta(0enver Aerospace)
DC Fort Lincoln Barrel Site
OE Old Brine Sludge Landfill
DE Pigeon Point Landfill
FL Davidson Lumber Co.
FL Montco Research Products, Inc.
FL Pratt & Whitney Aircraft/United Technologies Corp.
GA Olin Corp. (Areas 1,2 & 4)
HI Kunia Wells I
HI Kunia Wells II
HI MUilani Wells
HI Waiawa Shaft
HI Waipahu Wells
HI Waipio Heights Wells II
IA A.Y. McDonald Industries, Inc.
IA Chemplex Co.
IA Frit Industries (Humboldt Plant)
IA John Deere (Dubuque Works)
IA U.S. Naneplate Co.
City/County
Waterloo
Washington
Delaware City
New Castle
South Miami
Hoi lister
West Palm Beach
Augusta
Oahu
Oahu
Oahu
Oahu
Oahu
Oahu
Dubuque
C 1 i nton/Camanche
Humboldt
Dubuque
Mount Vernon
Announced Score
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/23/81
9/08/83 9/21/84
48FR 40674 49FR 37070
1/22/87 10/04/89
52FR 2492 54FR 41 015
10/15/84 6/10/86
49FR 40320 51FR 21054
10/15/84 3/31/89
49FR 40320 54FR 13296
9/18/85
50FR 37950
9/08/83
48FR 40674
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/15/84
49FR 40320
4/10/85
50FR 14115
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/15/84
49FR 40320
Other"
10/04/89
54FR 41000
12/30/826
47FR 58476
10/04/89
54 FR 41000
10/04/89
54 FR 41000
2/11/91f
56FR 5598
2/11/91f
56FR 5598
2/11/91f
56FR 5598
2/11/91f
56FR 5598
2/11/91f
56FR 5598
2/11/91f
56FR 5598
10/04/89
54FR 41000
2/11/91
56FR 5598
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
19
-------
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPL
February 1992
St Site Name
ID Flynn Lumber Co.
IL Sheffield (US Ecology, Inc.)
IL stauffer Chemical Co. (Chicago Heights Plant)
IL Warner Electric Brake & Clutch Co
IN Firestone Industrial Products Co.
IN NcCarty's Bald Knob Landfill
IN Parrot Road Dump
KS National Industrial Environmental Services
Ml E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc. (Montague Plant)
Ml Ford Motor Co. (Sludge Lagoon)
MI Hooker (Montague Plant)
MI Lacks Industries, Inc.
MI Lena wee Disposal Service, Inc., Landfill
MI Littlefield Township Dump
MO Findett Corp.
MO Quail Run Mobile Manor
MS Gautier Oil Co., Inc.
MS Plastifax, Inc.
MT Burlington Northern Railroad (Somers Tie-Treating
Plant)
City/County
Calduell
Sheffield
Chicago Heights
Roscoe
Noblesville
Mt. vernon
New Haven
Fur ley
Montague
Ypsilanti
Montague
Grand Rapids
Adrian
Oden
St. Charles
Gray Simnit
Gautier
Gulf port
Somers
Proposed/
Announced
12/30/82
47FR 58476
10/15/84
49FR 40320
1/22/87
52FR 2492
6/24/88
53FR 23988
9/18/85
50FR 37950
1/22/87
52FR 2492
12/30/82
47FR 58476
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
1/22/87
52FR 2492
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
12/30/82
47FR 58476
10/15/84
49FR 40320
9/08/83
48FR 40674
6/24/88
53FR 23988
7/23/82
10/15/84
49FR 40320
Date
Removed
Score8
9/08/83
48FR 40658
10/04/89
54FR 41015
10/04/89
54FR 41015
9/08/83
48FR 40658
3/31/89
54 FR 13296
8/30/90
55FR 35502
6/10/86
51 FR 21054
9/21/84
49FR 37070
8/30/90
55FR 35502
9/08/83h
48FR 40658
Otherb
10/04/89
54FR 41000
8/30/90
55FR 35502
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
2/11/91
56FR 5598
2/11/919
56FR 5598
2/' V91
56F» 5598
20
-------
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPL
February 1992
St Site Name
MT Comet Oil Co.
NE Monroe Auto Equipment Co.
NE Phillips Chemical Co.
NJ Horstmam's Dump
NJ Jame Fine Chemical
NJ Mat lack, Inc.
OH General Electric Co. (Coshocton Plant)
OK Kerr-McGee Corp. (Cashing Plant)
OK Sunray Oil Co. Refinery
PA Keyser Avenue Borehole
PA Rohm and Haas Co. Landfill
TX Pig Road
TX Rio Grande Oil Co. Refinery
UT Mayflower Mountain Tailings Pond
UT Olson/Neihart Reservoir
UT Richardson Flat Tailings
UT Silver Creek Tailings
VA IBM Corp. (Manassas Plant Spill)
UA Ouendall Terminal
City/County
Billings
Cozad
Beatrice
East Hanover
Bound Brook
Woolwich Township
Coshocton
Gushing
Allen
Sc rant on
Bristol Township
New Waver I y
Sour Lake
Wasatch County
Wasatch County
Summit County
Park City
Manassas
Renton
Proposed/
Announced
6/24/88
53FR 23988
9/18/85
50FR 37950
12/30/82
47FR 58476
1/22/87
52FR 2492
10/15/84
49FR 40320
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/26/89
54FR 43778
6/24/88
53FR 23988
6/24/88
53FR 23988
4/10/85
50FR 14115
9/08/83
48FR 40674
6/24/88
53FR 23988
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
6/24/88
53FR 23988
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
Date
Removed
Score8
2/11/91
56FR 5598
9/08/83
48FR 40658
3/31/89
54FR 13296
6/ 10/86*
51 FR 21054
2/11/91
56FR 5598
8/30/90
55FR 35502
2/21/90
55FR 6154
6/10/86
51FR 21054
8/30/90
55FR 35502
6/10/86
51FR 21054
3/31/89
54FR 13296
2/11/91
56FR 5598
6/10/86
51FR 21054
Other6
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54 FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/17/86^
10/04/89
54f8 41000
21
-------
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPL
February 1992
Date
st
UA
WI
UV
Site Mane
Rosch Property
Fort Howard Paper Co. Sludge Lagoons
Hobay Chemical Corp. (New Martinsville Plant)
City/County
Roy
Green Bay
New Martinsville
D rrwio^^i /
rropOSeQ/
Announced
9/08/83
48FR 40674
6/24/88
53FR 23988
10/15/84
49FR 40320
Remov
Score8
9/21/84
49FR 37070
8/30/90
55FR 35502
red
Other6
10/04/89
54FR 41000
Nunber of sites removed: 79
?Final HRS score below 28.50.
Subject to RCRA Subtitle C, except as noted.
LOn Interim Priorities List announced October 23, 1981; removed at proposal of first NPL (47FR 58476, December 30, 1982).
Contamination occurs naturally.
On Interim Priorities List announced October 23, 1981; removed at proposal of first NPL (47FR 58476, December 30, 1982),
,a Federal facility site and so ineligible at the time.
Pending development of EPA pesticide policy.
?No longer meets health advisory issued by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
On Expanded Eligibility List announced July 23, 1982; removed at proposal of first NPL (47FR 58476, December 30, 1982)
.because State withdrew top-priority designation, HRS score below 28.50.
.Included in Brook Industrial Park, placed on NPL October 4, 1989 (54FR 41015).
JRemoved per SARA Section 118(p).
NOTE: Van Dale Junkyard, Marietta, OH, in first proposed NPL (47FR 58476, Decanter 30, 1982); removed September 8, 1\
(48FR 40658); reproposed October 15, 1984 (49FR 40320); listed June 10, 1986 (51FR 21054).
22
-------
National Priorities List,
Final and Proposed Sites Per State/Territory
(by Total Sites)
February 1992
Final
State/Territory
New Jersey
Pennsylvania
California
New York
Michigan
Florida
Washington
Minnesota
Wisconsin
Illinois
Indiana
Ohio
Texas
Massachusetts
South Carolina
Missouri
North Carolina
Virginia
Delaware
Iowa
Kentucky
Colorado
New Hampshire
Connecticut
Tennessee
Georgia
Utah
Alabama
Arkansas
Louisiana
Rhode Island
Kansas
Arizona
Maryland
New Mexico
Oklahoma
Idaho
Maine
Oregon
Puerto Rico
Montana
Nebraska
Vermont
Alaska
West Virginia
South Dakota
Wyoming
Guam
Hawaii
Mississippi
North Dakota
Nevada
Virgin Islands
American Samoa
Commonwealth of Marianas
District of Colunbia
Trust Territories
Gen
102
90
67
79
77
47
31
39
39
32
32
30
25
22
22
19
21
19
19
19
17
13
15
14
12
11
7
10
10
10
9
9
7
8
8
9
7
7
7
8
a
5
8
2
5
2
2
1
0
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
Fed
6
4
20
4
0
4
14
2
0
4
0
3
3
3
1
3
1
1
1
1
0
3
1
1
2
2
4
2
0
1
2
1
3
2
2
1
2
2
1
1
0
1
0
4
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0 .
0
0
0
0
Proposed
Gen
0
6
6
1
0
4
3
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
2
0
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Fed
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
108
100
95
84
77
55
49
41
40
37
33
33
29
26
24
23
23
22
20
20
19
17
17
15
15
13
13
12
12
12
12
11
10
10
10
10
9
9
9
9
8
8
8
6
5
4
3
2
2
2
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
Total
1067
116
43
1235
23
-------
National Priorities List,
Final and Proposed Sites
-------
National Priorities List,
Final and Proposed Sites (by EPA Region)
February 1992
Reg State/Territory
Final
Gen Fed
Proposed
Gen Fed
Total
06
Arkansas
Louisiana
New Mexico
Oklahoma
Texas
10
10
8
9
25
0
1
2
1
3
0
0
0
0
1
12
12
10
10
29
62
73
07
Iowa
Kansas
Missouri
Nebraska
19
9
19
5
20
11
23
8
52
62
08 Colorado
Montana
North Dakota
South Dakota
Utah
Wyoming
13
8
2
2
7
2
3
0
0
1
4
1
1
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
8
2
4
13
3
34
47
09 American Samoa
Arizona
California
Commonwealth of Marianas
Hawai i
Nevada
Trust Territories
0
7
67
0
1
0
1
0
0
3
20
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
10
95
0
2
2
1
0
76
24
110
10 Alaska
Idaho
Oregon
Washington
2
7
7
31
4
2
1
14
6
9
9
49
47
21
73
Total
1067 116
43
1235
25
-------
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
Date/Citation/Number of Sites
Date
October 23, 1981
115 ("Interim Priorities List")1
July 23, 1982
45 ("Expanded Eligibility List")1
December 30, 1982 (47 FR 58476)
418 (proposal of first NPL, including 153 of 160 sites
announced previously)
March 4, 1983 (48 FR 9311)
i (proposal of Times Beach, Missouri)
September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40658)
406 (promulgation of first NPL; 1 proposed site split into 2
sites; 1 site deleted; 6 proposed sites dropped; 7 sites remain
proposed)
September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40674)
133 (Proposed Rule #1)
May 8, 1984 (49 FR 19480)
4 (promulgation of 4 San Gabriel Valley Sites in California,
part of Proposed Rule #1)
September 21, 1984 (49 FR 37070)
128 (promulgation of 123 Proposed Rule #1 sites and 5 from
original proposal; 4 proposed sites dropped)
October 15, 1984 (49 FR 40320)
244, including 36 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #2)
February 14, 1985 (50 FR 6320)
2 (promulgation of Glen Ridge and Montclair/West Orange
Radium Sites in New Jersey, part of Proposed Rule #2)
April 10, 1985 (50 FR 141 15)
32, including 6 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #3)
September 16, 1985 (50 FR 37630)
1 (promulgation of Lansdowne Radiation Site in Pennsylvania,
part of Proposed Rule #3)
Number of Sites
Final
406
410
538
538
540
540
541
Proposed
115
160
418
419
140
136
4
248
246
278
277
Total
115
160
418
419
546
546
542
786
786
818
818
26
-------
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
(continued)
Date
September 18, 1985 (50 FR 37950)
41, including 3 Federal facility sites and one reproposed site
(Proposed Rule #4)
June 10, 1986 (51 FR 21054)
170 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #1-4; 8 sites
deleted)
June 10, 1986 (5 1 FR 2 1099)
45, including 2 Federal Facility sites (Proposed Rule #5)
June 10, 1986(51 FR21109)
proposed RCRA policy; reopening of comment period for 5
sites
January 22, 1987 (52 FR 2492)
64, including 1 Federal facility site (Proposed Rule #6)
February 25, 1987 (52 FR 5578)
Availability of information
May 13, 1987 (52 FR 17991)
proposed RCRA policy for Federal facility sites
July 22, 1987 (52 FR 27620)
99 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-6)
July 22, 1987 (52 FR 27643)
7 (reproposal of Federal facility sites)
June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23978)
43 (reproposal of RCRA sites)
June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23988)
229, including 14 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #7)
August 9, 1988 (53 FR 30002/30005)
RCRA policy statements
March 13, 1989 (54 FR 10512)
(8 Federal facility sites)
and
March 31, 1989 (54 FR 13296)
101 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-7; 4
proposed sites dropped)
Number of Sites
Final
541
703
703
802
7993
8903
Proposed
318
185
2482
149
378
273
Total
859
888
951
951
1,177
1,163
27
-------
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
(continued)
Date
May 5, 1989 (54 FR 19526)
10 (Proposed Rule #8)
July 14, 1989 (54 FR 29820)
52 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #9)
August 16, 1989 (54 FR 33846)
2 (proposal of ATSDR sites)
October 4, 1989 (54 FR 41000/41015)
93 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-8; 31
proposed sites dropped)
October 26, 1989 (54 FR 43778)
25, including 2 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #10, last
proposed rule under original HRS)
November 21, 1989 (54 FR 48184)
29 (promulgation of 27 Federal facility sites from Proposed
Rule #9 and 2 ATSDR sites; expansion of 1 Federal facility
site)
February 21, 1990 (55 FR 6154)
71 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-7, 9; 1
proposed site dropped)
March 14, 1990 (55 FR 9688)
1 (promulgation of United Heckathom Co. , Richmond,
California, part of Proposed Rule #10)
August 30, 1990 (55 FR 35502)
106 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2, 5-10; 10
proposed sites dropped)
February 11, 1991 (56 FR 5598)
6 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2, 5-7, 10;
14 proposed sites dropped) (last final rule under original HRS)
May 9, 1991 (56 FR 21460)
1 (proposal of ATSDR site)
July 29, 1991 (56 FR 35840)
22 (Proposed Rule #11, first proposed rule under revised HRS)
September 25, 1991 (56 FR 48438)
1 (promulgation of ATSDR site)
January 1992
30 (Proposed Rule #12)
Number of Sites
Final
890
8893
889
9813
981
1,010
1,081
1,082
1,1873
1,1893
1,188s
1,188
1,1853
1.1833
Proposed
283
335
337
213
238
209
137
136
20
. 0
1
23
22
52
Total
1,173
1,224
1,226
1,194
1,219
1,219
1,218
1,218
1,207
1,189
1,189
1,211
1,207
1,235
1 No Federal Register notice.
2 Silver Creek failings, Park City, UT, removed October 17, 1986 as required by CERCLA Section 118(p).
Reflects deletions since last rule.
28
------- |