United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Publication 9320.7-051
Solid Waste and September 1995
Emergency Response
^^M. '
vxEPASupplementary Materials:
National Priorities List,
Proposed Rule and Final Rule
Office of Emergency end Remedial Response
Hazardous Site Evaluation Division (5204G)
Intermittent Bulletin
Volume 5, Number 2 (Proposed Rule)
Volume 2, Number 3 (Final Rule)
The National Priorities List (NPL) informs the
public of uncontrolled hazardous waste sites that
warrant further investigation to determine if they pose
risks to human health or the environment. Such sites
are eligible for long-term "remedial action" financed
under the Trust Fund established by the Comprehen-
sive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) as amended by the
Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
1986 (SARA). In October 1990, CERCLA was
extended to September 30, 1994. An appropriation
by Congress for Fiscal Year 1995 authorized
Superfund to continue to operate. The U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has the
primary responsibility for managing the Superfund
program.
Table of Contents
How Sites Are Placed on the NPL 2
Statutory Requirements and Listing Policies 3
NPL Status (September 1995) . . 4
How Sites Are Deleted From the NPL 5
Removing Proposed Sites , 5
Key Dates In Superfund 6
Lists and Data Summaries 7
Federal Facilities Section (by State) ....... 8
Proposed Sites (by State) 13
Sites Deleted from the NPL .'. . . . . . 16
^ NPL Sites Per State/Territory (by New Final Sites) ... .',-.. . . . . V. . .-.-;. -.-..'. . 19
NPL Sites Per EPA Region 20
Federal Register Notices 22
-------
HOW SITES ARE PLACED
ON THE NPL
EPA uses informal rulemaking to place sites on
the NPL. Sites are first proposed to the NPL hi the
Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments
on the sites (typically for 60 days), responds to the
comments, and finally places on the NPL those sites
that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Section 300.425(c) of the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP), the Federal regulation by which CERCLA is
implemented (55 FR 8845, March 8, 1990), provides
three mechanisms for placing sites on the NPL. The
primary mechanism is EPA's Hazard Ranking System
(HRS). The original HRS, developed in 1982,
evaluated the relative threat a site posed to human
health or the environment over five "pathways," or
routes of exposure. The HRS score was based on the
evaluation of three pathways through which
contaminants can migrate: ground water, surface
water, and air. The other two pathways, direct
contact and fire/explosion, were evaluated to
determine the need for immediate removal
(emergency) action. HRS scores ranged from 0 to
100. An HRS score of 28.50 was selected as the
cutoff point for the first proposed NPL to identify at
least 400 sites, the minimum suggested by CERCLA.
On December 14, 1990 (55 FR 51532), EPA
revised the HRS, as required by SARA. The revised
HRS became effective on March 14, 1991. It is a
more comprehensive and accurate scoring system
than the original HRS and may add new types of sites
to the NPL.
The revised HRS retains the same cutoff score
and basic approach as the original HRS, while
incorporating SARA requirements as well as
improvements identified as necessary by EPA and the
public. The revised HRS retains the ground water,
surface water, and air pathways,.drops the direct
contact and fire/explosion pathways, and adds a
fourth pathway, soil exposure. All four can be used
to calculate the site score.
.'" The second mechanism for placing sites on the
NPL allows States or Territories to designate one top-
priority site regardless of score. Of the 57 States and
Territories,- 40 have designated top-priority sites.
Seven of these sites have been dele.-d from the NPL
because no further response was necessary.
The third mechanism allows listing a site if it
meets all three of these requirements:
The Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry (ATSDR) of the U.S.
Public Health Service has issued a health
advisory that recommends removing people
from the site.
EPA determines the site poses a significant
threat to public health.
EPA anticipates it will be more cost-
effective to use its remedial authority
(available only at NPL sites) than to use its
emergency removal authority to respond to
the site.
Twelve sites have been proposed to the NPL on
the basis of ATSDR advisories:
Seven are on the NPL: Forest Glen
Mobile Home Subdivision, Niagara
Falls, NY, and Radium Chemical Co.,
Inc., New York City, NY (54 FR
. 48184, November 21, 1989); White
Chemical Corp., Newark NJ (56 FR
48438, September 25, 1991); Austin
Avenue Radiation Site, Delaware
County, PA (57 FR 47181, October 14,
1992); Lower Ecorse Creek Dump,
Wyandotte, MI (59 FR 27989, May 31,
1994); Raymark Industries, Inc.,
Stratford, CT (59 FR 2568 January '. >i
1995); and Tennessee Products,
Chattanooga, TN (September 1995).
One, Lansdowne Radiation Site, Lansdowne,
PA has been deleted because all appropriate
response has been completed (56 FR 46121,
September 10, 1991).
One, Quail Run Mobile Manor, Gray
Summit, MO (48 FR 40674, September 8,
1983) was dropped from .''further
consideration on February 11, 1991 (56 FR
5598). Because of an EPA removal action,
ATSDR had rescinded its health advisory.
-------
Three, Aircraft Components (D&L Sales),
Benton Harbor, MI; H&K Sales, Belding, MI;
and Little Valley, Little Valley, NY, were
proposed in this rule (September 1995).
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
AND LISTING POLICIES
CERCLA restricts EPA's authority to respond to
certain sites by expressly excluding some substances -
- petroleum, for example from the definition of
"release." In addition, as a matter of policy, EPA
may choose not to use CERCLA because the Federal
government can undertake or enforce cleanup under
other laws, thus preserving CERCLA funds for sites
not covered by other laws. EPA has chosen not to
use CERCLA for certain types of sites regulated by
Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA) and the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC). However, if EPA later
determines that sites not listed as a matter of policy
are not being properly responded to, it may consider
placing them on the NPL.
RCRA-Related Sites
When the first final NPL was promulgated in
September 1983, EPA announced certain listing
policies relating to sites that might qualify for the
NPL. One of these policies involved facilities subject
to RCRA Subtitle C. EPA's policy was generally not
to place on the NPL, RCRA "regulated units" (for
example, land disposal units that received hazardous
waste after the effective date of the RCRA land
disposal regulations) because EPA can require the
owner/operator to c'^an up undei Rf!RA, The
RCRA cleanup process and standards are similar to
those under CERCLA, ensuring that all actions taken
will protect human health and the environment.
In November 1984, the Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments (HSWA) to RCRA were enacted,
expanding EPA's authority to require corrective
measures under Subtitle C. As a result of this
broadened RCRA authority, EPA revised its policy
for placing non-Federal RCRA-regulated sites on the ,
rNPLYl-aj^^dn June: 1Q,= 1986 (54 FR iZlQS?)
announced that facilities subject to RCRA Subtitle C
corrective action authorities would be placed on the
.NPL if one or more of these conditions exists:
The facilities are owned by persons who
have demonstrated an inability to finance
appropriate corrective action by invoking
bankruptcy laws.
The facilities have lost authorization to
operate (also known as the Loss of Interim
Status, or LOIS provision), and there are
additional indications that the owner or
operator is unwilling to undertake corrective
action.
The facilities have not lost authorization to
operate but have a clear history of
unwillingness to undertake corrective action.
These situations are determined on a case-
by-case basis.
On June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23978) and October 9,
1989 (54 FR 41000), EPA announced additional
components of the NPL/RCRA policy. As a matter
of policy, EPA will list four additional categories of
RCRA-related sites:
Facilities that were treating, storing, or
disposing of Subtitle C hazardous waste after
November 19, 1980, but that did not file a
"Part A," the initial part of the permit
application, by that date as required and
have little or no history of compliance with
RCRA. EPA believes that these non- or late
filers, although they are technically subject
to RCRA, are not' likely to be cleaned up
expeditiously under RCRA and so should be
on the NPL. However, if such facilities
have complied with RCRA, EPA may
consider whether listing is necessary.
Facilities with permits for the treatment,
storage, or disposal of hazardous waste
issued before enactment of HSWA, and
whose owners/operators will not voluntarily
modify the permit. Pre-HSWA permittees
are not required to take corrective action for
releases. Under RCRA Section 3004(u),
EPA does not have the authority to modify
a pre-HSWA permit'ibr: corrective action
. untU me permit is reissued. '
-------
NPL Status (September 1995)
Number of Sites on Final NPL
Total: 1,238
General Superfund Section: 1,083
Federal Facilities Section: 1 55
Number of Sites Remaining on Proposed NPL
Total: 52
General Superfund Section: 47
Federal Facilities Section: 5
Total Number of Final and Proposed Sites
1,290
Number of Sites on the Construction Completion List
304
Number of Sites Deleted from Final NPL
84
Facilities that filed a Part A permit
application for treatment, storage, or
disposal of Subtitle C hazardous waste as a
precautionary measure only. Such facilities
- for example, generators, transporters, or
recyclers of hazardous waste ~ are not
subject to Subtitle C corrective action
authorities. These are referred to as
protective filers.
Facilities that at one time treated or stored
Subtitle C hazardous waste but have since
converted to generator-only status (i.e.,
facilities that now store hazardous waste for
90 days or less) or any of'er hazardous
waste activity not requiring Interim Status.
These facilities, whose Part A permit
applications have been withdrawn with EPA
or State approval, are referred to as
converters. EPA believes it has the
authority under RCRA Section 3008(u) to
compel corrective action at such facilities.
However, RCRA's corrective action
program currently focuses primarily on
treatment, storage, and disposal facilities
(due to permitting deadlines in RCRA).
Therefore,' this category should be.on the
NPL to ensure expeditious cleanup.
However, if a consent order requiring
remedial action is in effect, a converter need
not be listed.
Federal Facility Sites
CERCLA Section 120(a) requires that Federal
facilities be subject to and comply with CERCLA in
the same manner as any nongovernmental entity.
CERCLA Section lll(e)(3), however, generally
prohibits use of the Trust Fund for remedial actions
at Federally owned facilities. Thus, Federal agencies
must use their own funds for cleanup. Federal sites
are listed in a separate section of Appendix B, rather
than in the General Superfund Section.
Because most Federal facilities have RCRA-
regulated units within their boundaries, EPA
Determined that a separate NPL/RCRA policy should
be adopted for Federal facilities. AD a result, on
March 13, 1989 (54 FR 10520), EPA announced it
would place on the NPL those sites located on
Federally owned or operated facilities that reel the
NPL eligibility requirements e.g., HRS scores of
28.50 or greater - even if the Federal facility also is
subject to the corrective action authorities of RCRA
Subtitle C. Cleanup, if appropriate, could then
proceed at those sites under either CERCLA or
RCRA. The policy is based on several
considerations: ',,,'./ :.'"",
Congress clearly intended that Federal
facility sites should be on the NPL.
Strict application of the non-Federal
NPL/RCRA policy would exclude virtually
-------
all Federal facility sites from the NPL
because they would not likely meet any of
the criteria necessary for listing (inability to
pay as evidenced by invocation of
bankruptcy laws or demonstrated
unwillingness to comply with RCRA).
Placing RCRA-regulated Federal sites on the
NPL serves the primary purpose of listing
Federal facility sites to advise the public of
the status of Federal government cleanup
efforts.
Listing these sites helps Federal agencies set
priorities and focus cleanup efforts on those
sites that present the most serious problem.
Radioactive Release Sites
CERCLA Section 101(22) excludes several types
of releases of radioactive materials from the statutory
definition of "release." These releases are therefore
not eligible for CERCLA response actions or the
NPL. The exclusions apply to (1) releases of source,
by-product, or special nuclear material from a nuclear
incident if these releases are' subject to financial
protection requirements under Section 170 of the
Atomic Energy Act and (2) any releases of source,
by-product, or special nuclear material from any
processing site designated under the Uranium Mill
Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978.
Accordingly, such radioactive releases have not been
considered eligible for the NPL.
As a policy matter, EPA has also chosen not to
list releases of source, by-product, or special nuclear
material from any facility with a current license
issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC), on the grounds that NRC has full authority to
require cleanup of releases from such facilities. EPA
will, however, list releases from facilities that hold a
current license issued by a State pursuant to an
agreement between the State and die NRC under
Section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act. Facilities
whose licenses are no longer in effect are also
considered for listing.
HOW SITES ARE DELETED
NPU: i ,<. ;.-*<..
EPA may delete a final NPL site if it determines
that no further response is required to protect human
health or the environment. Under Section 300.425(e)
of the NCP (55 FR 8845, March 8, 1990,) a site may
be deleted where no further response is apprcpriate if
EPA determines that one of the following criteria has
been met:
EPA, in conjunction with the State, has
determined that responsible or other parties
have implemented all appropriate response
action required.
EPA, in consultation with the State, has
determined that all appropriate Superfund-
financed response under CERCLA has been
implemented, and that no further response
by responsible parties is appropriate.
A remedial investigation has shown that the
release poses no significant threat to public
health or the environment, and, therefore
remedial measures are not appropriate.
Since 1986, EPA has followed these procedures
for deleting a site from' the NPL:
The Regional Administrator approves a
"close-out report" which establishes that all
appropriate response action has been taken
or that no action is required.
The Regional Office obtains State
concurrence.
EPA publishes a notice of intent to delete in
the Federal Register and hi a major
newspaper near the community involved. A
public comment period is provided.
EPA responds to the comments and, if the
site continues to warrant deletion, publishes
a deletion notice in the Federal Register.
Sites that have been deleted from the NPL
remain eligible for further Superfund-financed
remedial action in the unlikely event that conditions
in the future warrant such action.
REMOVING PROPOSED SITES
As of September 1995; 78, sites have been
proposed fprthe NPL but subse^uenUy removed from
further consideration, most of; them because their
final HRS scores were below the 28.50 cutoff or they
are subject to RCRA Subtitle C. Three of the sites '
were reproposed on February 7, 1992 (57 FR 4824)
after being rescored with the revised HRS.
-------
Key Dates in Superfund
Legislation
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA) enacted December 11, 1980; Trust Fund of $1.6 billion
authorized over 5 years
CERCLA amended by Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
(SARA) enacted October 17, 1986; Trust Fund of $8.5 billion authorized
over 5 years
CERCLA extended to September 30, 1994; an additional $5.1 billion
authorized
Federal regulation implementing Superfund: National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP)
Revised July 16, 1982 (47 FR 31180) to incorporate CERCLA
requirements
Revised March 8, 1990 (55 FR 8666) in response to CERCLA Section
105, amended by SARA
Hazard Ranking System
Promulgated July 16, 1982 (47 FR 31180) as Appendix A of the NCP
Revised December 14, 1990 (55 FR 51532) in response to CERCLA
Section 105(c), added by SARA; effective date March 14, 1991
National Prioi.ties List
Promulgated September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40658) as Appendix B of the
NCP
Must be updated at least annually
Last sites proposed under original MRS promulgated February 11, 1991
(56 FR 5598); Construction Completion category activated (56 FR 5634)
First sites proposed under revised MRS July 29,1991 (56 FR 35840)
First sites added to N PL under revised HRS October 14, 1992 (57 FR
47181)
»
Construction Completion List activated March 2, 1993 (58 FR 12142)
-------
LISTS AND DATA SUMMARIES
-------
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
September 1995
St Site Name
City/County
Date
Proposed Final
AK Adak Naval Air Station
AK Eielson Air Force Base
AK Elmendorf Air Force Base
AK Fort Richardson (USARMY)
AK Fort Wainwright , ,
AK Standard Steel&Metals Salvage YardCUSDOT
6 Final + 0 Proposed = 6
AL Alabama Army Ammunition Plant
AL Anniston Army Depot (SE Industrial Area)
AL Redstone Arsenal (USARMY/NASA)
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
AZ Luke Air Force Base
AZ Williams Air Force Base
AZ Yuma Marine Corps Air Station
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
CA Barstou Marine Corps Logistics Base
CA Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base
CA Castle Air Force Base
CA Concord Naval Weapons Station
CA Edwards Air Force Base
CA El Toro Marine Corps Air Station
CA Fort Ord .
CA George Air Force Base
CA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (NASA)
CA LEHR/Old Campus Landfill (USDOE)
CA Lawrence Liver-more Lab Site 300 (USDOE)
CA Lawrence Livermore Laboratory (USDOE)
CA March Air Force Base
CA Mather Air Force Base
CA McClellan Air Force Base (GW Contam)
CA Moffett Naval Air Station
CA Norton Air Force Base
CA Riverbank Army.Ammunition Plant
CA Sacramento Army Depot
CA Sharpe Army Depot
CA Tracy Defense Depot (USARMY)
CA Travis Air Force Base
CA Treasure Island Naval Station-Hun Pt An
23 Final + 0 Proposed = 23
CO Air Force Plant PJKS
CO Rocky Flats Plant (USDCE)
CO Rocky Mountain Arsenal (USARMY)
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
CT . New London Submarine Base
1 >iriat * 0 Proposed = 1
. DE Dover Air Force Base "
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Adak . 10/92 05/94
Fairbanks N Star Boro 07/89 11/89
Greater Anchorage Bor 07/89 08/90
Anchorage 06/93 05/94
Fairbanks N Star Boro 07/89 08/90
Anchorage 07/89 08/90
Childersburg 10/84 07/87
Anniston 10/84 03/89
Huntsville 06/93 05/94
Glendale 07/89 08/90
Chandler 07/89 11/89
Yuma 06/88 02/90
Barstow
San Diego County
Merced
Concord
Kern County
El Tore
Marina
Victorville
Pasadena
Davis
Livermore
Livermore
Riverside
Sacramento
Sacramento
Sunnyvale
San Bernardino
Riverbank
Sacransento
Lathrop
Tracy
Solano County
San Francisco
07/89
07/89
10/84
02/92
07/89
06/88
07/89
07/89
02/92
01/94
07/89
10/84
07/89
10/84
10/84
04/85
10/84
06/88
10/84
10/84
07/89
07/89
07/89
11/89
11/89
07/87
12/94
08/90
02/90
02/90
02/90
10/92
05/94
08/90
07/87
11/89
07/87
07/87
07/87
07/87
02/90
07/87
07/87
08/90
11/89
11/89
Waterloo
Golden
Adams County
New London
Dover
07/89
10/84
10/84
11/89
10/89
07/87
10/89 08/90
10/84" 03/89
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
September 1995
Date
St Site Name
FL Cecil Field Naval Air Station
FL Homestead Air Force Base
FL Jacksonville Naval Air Station
FL Pensacola Naval Air Station
FL Whiting Field Naval Air Station
5 Final + 0 Proposed = 5
GA Marine Corps Logistics Base
GA Robins Air Force Base(Lf#4/Sludge lagoon
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
GU Andersen Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
HI Naval Computer & Telecommunications Area
HI Pearl Harbor Naval Complex
HI Schofield Barracks (USARMY)
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
IA Iowa Army Ammunition Plant
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
ID Idaho National Engineering Lab (USDOE)
ID Mountain Home Air Force Base
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
IL Joliet Army Ammunition Plant (LAP Area)
IL Joliet Army Ammunition Plant (Mfg Area)
IL Sangamo Electric/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI
IL Savanna Army Depot Activity
4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4
KS Fort Riley
KS Sunflower Army Ammunition Plant
1 Final + 1 Proposed = 2
KY Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (USDOE)
. 1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
LA Louisiana Army Ammunition Plant
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
MA Fort Devens :
MA Fort Devens-Sudbury Training Annex
MA Jianscom Field/Hanscom Air Force Base
MA Materials Technology Laboratory (USARMY)
MA Natick Laboratory Army Research.D&E Cntr
MA Naval Weapons Industrial Reserve Plant
MA Otis Air National Guard (USAF)
MA South Ueymouth Naval Air Station
City/County
Jacksonville
Homestead
Jacksonville
Pensacola
Milton
Albany
Houston County
Yigo
Oahu
Pearl Harbor
Oahu
Middletown
Idaho Falls
Mountain Home
Joliet
Joliet
Carterville
Savanna
Junction City
DeSoto
Paducah
Doyline
Fort Devens
Middlesex County
Bedford
Watertbwn .
-r . '-.' Natick .-- r - ' f :
Bedford
Falroouth -
Ueymouth
Proposed
07/89
07/89
07/89
07/89
01/94
07/89
10/84
02/92
01/94
07/91
07/89
07/89
07/89
07/89
04/85
10/84
10/84
10/84
-
07/89
02/95
05/93
10/84
07/89
07/89
05/93
06/93
05/93
06/93
07/89
06/93
Final
11/89
08/90
11/89
11/89
05/94
11/89
07/87
10/92
05/94
10/92
08/90
08/90
11/89
' 08/90
03/89
07/87
07/87
03/89
08/90 .
05/94
03/89
11/89
02/90
05/94
05/94
05/94
05/94
11/89
05/94
8 Final + 0 Proposed = 8
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
September 1995
St Site Name
MD Aberdeen Proving Ground (Edgewood Area)
MD Aberdeen Proving Ground(Michaelsville LF
MD Beltsville Agricultural Research (USDA)
MD. Indian Head Naval Surface Warfare Center
MD Patuxent River Naval Air Station
5 Final + 0 Proposed = 5
ME Brunswick Naval Air Station
ME Loring Air Force Base
ME Portsmouth Naval Shipyard
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
MI -Wurtsmith Air Force Base
0 Final + 1 Proposed = 1
MN Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant
MN New Brighton/Arden Hills/TCAAP (USARMY)
MN Twin Cities Air Force Base(SAR Landfill)
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
MO Lake City Army Ammu. Plant (NW Lagoon)
MO Weldon Spring Former Army Ordnance Works
MO Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pi tts(USDOE)
3 Final + 0 Proposed =3
NC Camp Lejeune Military Res. (USNAVY)
NC Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
NE Cornhusker Army Ammunition Plant
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
NH Pease Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
NJ Federal Aviation Admin. Tech. Center
NJ Fort bix (Landfill Site)
NJ Naval Air Engineering Center
NJ Naval Weapons Station Earle (Site A)
NJ Pica tinny Arsenal (USARMY)
NJ W.R. Grace/Wayne Interim Storage (USDOE)
6 Final + 0 Proposed = 6
NM Cal West Metals (USSBA)
NM Lee Acres Landfill (USDOI)
r /,- 2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2 - _
NY Brookhaven National Laboratory (USDOE)
NY Griff iss Air Force Base
NY Plattsburgh Air Force Base
City/County
Edgewood
Aberdeen
Beltsville
Indian Head
St. Mary's County
Brunswick
Limestone
Kittery
losco County
Fridley
New Brighton '
Minneapolis
Independence
St. Charles County
St. Charles County
Ons low County
Havelock
Hall County
Portsmouth/Newington
Atlantic County
Pemberton Township
Lakehurst
Colts Neck
Rockaway Township
Wayne Township
Lemitar
- Fermi ngt on
/ . " - % . .
Upton :."
. -.Rome' ' ' '
Plattsburgh
Dati
Proposed
04/85
04/85
05/93
02/95
01/94
10/84
07/89
. 06/93
01/94
07/89
12/82
01/87
10/84
07/89
10/84
06/88
08/94
10/84
07/89
07/89
10/84
09/85
10/84
07/89
09/83
06/88
06/88
07/89
10/84
07/89
s
Final
02/90
10/89
05/94
09/95
05/94
07/87
02/90
05/94
11/89
09/83
07/87
07/87
02/90
07/87
10/89
12/94
07/87
02/90
08/90
07/87
07/87
08/90
02/90
09/84
03/89
08/90
11/89
07787
11/89
10
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
September 1995
St Site Name
Ci ty/County
Date
Proposed Final
NY Seneca Army Depot
4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4
OH Air Force Plant 85
OH Feed Materials Production Center (USDOE)
OH Hound Plant (USDOE)
OH Rickenbacker Air National Guard (USAF)
OH Wright-Patterson Air Force Base
3 Final + 2 Proposed = 5
OK Tinker Air Force(Soldier Cr/Bldg 300)
1 Final + 0 Proposed =1
OR Fremont Nat. Forest Uranium Mines (USDA)
OR Umatilla Army Depot (Lagoons)
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
PA Letterkenny Army Depot (PDO Area)
PA Letterkenny Army Depot (SE Area)
PA Naval Air Development Center(8 Areas)
PA Navy Ships Parts Control Center
PA Tobyhanna Army Depot
PA Willow Grove Naval Air & Air Res. Stn.
6 Final + 0 Proposed = 6
PR Naval Security Group Activity
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
RI Davisville Naval Construction Batt Cent
RI Newport Naval Education/Training Center
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
SC Parris Island Marine Corps Recruit Depot
SC Savannah River Site (USDOE)
2 Final + 0 Proposed - 2
SO Ellsworth Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed =1,
TN Arnold Engineering Develop. Ctr. (USAF)
TN Memphis Defense Depot (OLA)
TN Milan Array Ammunition Plant
TN Oak Ridge Reservation (USDOE)
3 Final>1 Proposed = 4
TX Air -Force Plant #4 (General Dynamics)
TX1 Lone. Star AnnyAmraunition Plant ' ',
fX ' Longhorn Army Ammunition Plant ..'-"
TX .Pantex Plant (USDOE) .;' ':'-' .,'
4 Final * 0 Proposed - 4
Romulus
07/89 08/90
Columbus
Fernald
Miamisburg
Lockbourne
Dayton
01/94
07/89
07/89
01/94
06/88
11/89
11/89
10/89
Oklahoma City
Lakeview
Hermiston
Franklin County
Chambersbiirg
Warminster Township
Mechanicsburg
Tobyhanna
Willow Grove
Sabana Seca
North Kingston
Newport
Parris island
Aiken
Rapid Jity
Tullahoma/Manchester
Memphis
Milan
Oak Ridge
Fort Worth .....
Texarkarta v.
Karnack'
Pantex Village
04/85 07/87
06/93 04/95
10/84 07/87
04/85 03/89
10/84 07/87
06/86 10/89
01/94 05/94
07/89 08/90
08/94 09/95
06/88 10/89
07/89 11/89
07/89 11/89
08/94 12/94
07/89 11/89
10/89 08/90
08/94
02/92 10/92
10/84 07/87
07/89 . 11/89
08/90
07/8> ; 08/90
07/91-105/94
11
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
September 1995
st
UT
UT
UT
UT
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
Site Name
Hill Air Force Base
Monti cello Mill Tailings (USDOE)
Ogden Defense Depot (DLA)
Tooele Army Depot (North Area)
4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4
Defense General Supply Center (DLA)
Fort Eustis (US Army)
Langley Air Force Base/NASA Langley Cntr
Marine Corps Combat Development Command
Naval Surface Warfare - Dahlgren
Naval .Weapons Station - Yorktown
City/County
Ogden
Monti cello
Ogden
Tooele
Chesterfield County
Newport News
Hampton
Quant i co
Dahlgren
Yorktown
Dat
Proposed
10/84
07/89
10/84
10/84
10/84
01/94
05/93
05/93
02/92
02/92
e
Final
07/87
11/89
07/87
08/90
07/87
12/94
05/94
05/94
10/92
10/92
. 6 Final + 0 Proposed = 6
WA American Lake Gardens/McChord AFB
WA Bangor Naval Submarine Base
WA Bangor Ordnance Disposal (USNAVY)
WA Bonneville Power Admin Ross (USDOE)
WA Fairchild Air Force Base (4 Waste Areas)
WA Fort Lewis Logistics Center
WA Hanford 100-Area (USDOE)
WA Hanford 1100-Area (USDOE)
WA Hanford 200-Area (USDOE)
WA Hanford 300-Area (USDOE)
WA Jackson Park Housing Complex (USNAVY)
WA McChord Air Force Base (Wash Rack/Treat)
WA Naval Air Station, Whidbey Is (Seaplane)
WA Naval Air Station, Whidbey Island (Ault)
WA Naval Undersea Warfare Station (4 Areas)
WA Old Navy Dump/Manchester Lab(USEPA/NOAA)
WA Port Hadlock Detachment (USNAVY)
WA Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Complex
18 Final + 0 Proposed = 18
WV Allegany Ballistics Laboratory (USNAVY)
WV West Virginia Ordnance (USARMY)
2 Final + 0 Proposed - 2
WY F.E. Warren Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
155 Final + 5 Proposed = 160
Tacoma
Silverdale
Bremerton
Vancouver
Spokane County
Tillicum
Benton County
Benton County
Benton County
Benton County
Kitsap County
Tacoma
Whidbey Island
Whidbey Island
Keyport
Manchester
Indian Island
Bremerton
Mineral
Point Pleasant
Cheyenne
09/83
07/89
10/84
07/89
06/88
07/89 .
06/88
06/88
06/88
06/88
06/93
10/84
09/85
09/85
06/86
01/94
06/93
05/93
06/93
12/82
09/84
08/90
07/87
11/89
03/89
11/89
10/89
10/89
10/89
10/89
05/94
07/87
02/90
02/90
10/89
05/94
05/94
05/94
05/94
09/83
07/89 02/90
12
-------
National Priorities List
Proposed Sites, by State
September 1995
St
Site Name
Location
Notes
a
AL
CA
CO
GA
ID
IL
IN
LA
General Superfund Sites
Monarch Tile Manufacturing, Inc.
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
General Superfund Sites
Cooper Drum Co.
Del Amo Facility
GBF, Inc., Dump
Stoker Company
4 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 4
General Superfund Sites
ASARCO, .,ic. (Globe Plant)
Smeltertown Site
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
General Superfund Sites
Breward County--21st Manor Dump
Normandy Park Apartments
Stauffer Chemical Co. (Tampa Plant)
3 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 3
General Superfund Sites
LCP Chemicals Georgia
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
General Superfund Sites
Waterloo Coal Gasification Plant
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
General Superfund Sites
Blackbird Mine
Triumph Mine Tailings Piles
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
General Superfund Sites
Jennison Wright Corporation
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
General Superfund Sites
U.S. Smelter & Lead Refinery Inc.
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility
Sites = 1
General Superfund Sites
Wright Ground Water Contamination
Federal Facility Sites
Sunflower Army Ammunition Plant
1 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 2
General Superfund Sites
Gulf State Utilities-North Ryan Street
Lincoln Creosote
Old Citgo Refinery (Bossier City)
3 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 3
General Superfund Sites
Ordnance Products,' Inc. - "'
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites - 1
General Superfund Sites
Eastern Surplus Co.
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
Florence
South Gate
Los Angeles
Antioch
Imperial
Denver
Salida
Fort Lauderdale
Temple Terrace
Tampa
Brunswick
Waterloo
Lemhi County
Triumph
Granite City
East Chicago
Wright
DeSoto
Lake Charles
Bossier City
Bossier
Cecil County*
Meddybemps
13
-------
National Priorities List
Proposed Sites, by State
September 1995
St
Site Name
Location
Notes
a
MI General Superfund Sites
Aircraft. Components Inc. (D & L Sales)
Bay City Middlegrounds
H & K Sales
Federal Facility Sites
Wurtsmith Air Force Base
3 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 4
MS General Superfund Sites
Chemfax, Inc.
Potter Co.
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
MT General Superfund Sites
Burlington Northern Livingston Complex
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
HE General Superfund Sites
Bruno Co-op Association/Associated Prop
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
HJ General Superfund Sites
Franklin Burn
Uelsbach & General Gas Mantle (Camden)
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
NX General Superfund Sites
Rinchem Co., Inc.
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
NY General Superfund.Sites
Little Valley
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
' OH General Superfund Sites
Diamond Shamrock CorpCPainesvilie Works)
Dover Chemical Corp.
Federal Facility Sites
Air Force Plant 85
Rickenbacker Air National Guard (USAF)
2 General Superfund Sites + 2 Federal Facility Sites = 4
ox General Superfund Sites
National Zinc Corp.
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
OK GeneraI'Superfund Sites
East Multnomah County Ground Wtr Contain.
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites - 1
PA ' General Superfund Sites
Breslube-Penn, Incorporated
East Tenth Street
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
so General Superfund.Sites ..
Annie Creek Mine Tailings :
1 General Superfund Sites * 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
TH Federal Facility Sites '
Arnold Engineering Develop. Ctr. (USAF) '
0 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 1
Benton Harbor
Bay City
Belding
losco County
Gulfport
Wesson
Livingston
Bruno
Franklin Township
Camden arid Gloucester
Albuquerque
Little Valley
Painesville
Dover
Columbus
Lockbourne
Bartlesvilie
Multnomah County
Coraopolis
Marcus Hook
LeadV /
Tul lahoma/Harichester
14
-------
National Priorities List
Proposed Sites, by State
September 1995
St
Site Name
Location
Notes
a
ur General Superfund Sites
Kennecott (North Zone) Magna
Kennecott (South Zone) Copperton
Murray Smelter , Murray City
Richardson Flat Tailings - Summit County
4 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 4
vi General Superfund Sites
Island Chemical Corp/V.I. Chemical Corp St. Croix
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites =1
wi General Superfund Sites
Penta Wood Products Siren
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
wv General Superfund Sites
Hani in-All ied-Oli,, Mounds vi lie
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites =1
47 General Superfund Sites + 5 Federal Facility Sites = 52
aA = Based on issuance of health advisory by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
(if scored, MRS score need not be > 28.50).
S = State top priority (included among the 100 top priority sites regardless of score).
15
-------
-------
Sites Deleted from the NPL
September 1995
st
AL
AR
AS
AZ
CA
CM
CO
CT
DE
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
IA
IA
IA
ID
IL
IN
IN
IN
KS
KS
KS
MA
MI
Site Name
Mowbray Engineering Co.
Cecil Lindsey
Taputinou Farm
Mountain View Mobile Home Estates
Jibboom Junkyard
PCB Warehouse
Woodbury Chemical Co.
Revere Textile Prints Corp.
New Castle Steel
Alpha Chemical Corp.
Parramore Surplus
Pioneer Sand Co.
Tri-CityOil Conservationist, Inc
varsol Spill
Wilson Concepts of Florida, Inc.
Luminous Processes, Inc.
Aidex Corp.
LaBounty Site
Northwestern States Portland Cement Co.
Arrcom (Drexler Enterprises)
Petersen Sand & Gravel
International Minerals (E. Plant)
Poer Farm
Wedzeb Enterprises, Inc.
Big River .Sand Co.
Hydro-Flex Inc.
Johns' Sludge Pond .
Plymouth^Harbpr/Cannpn Engineering Corp. ;...
Chemical /Metals Industrie*. inc.J; ': ".
Middletown Road pim>
Cemetery Dump :
Location
Greenville
Newport
Island of Tutila
Globe
Sacramento
Saipan
Commerce City
Sterling
New Castle County
Galloway
Mount Pleasant
Warrington
Tampa
Miami
Pompano Beach
Athens
Council Bluffs
Charles City
Mason City
Rathdrum
Litertyville
Terre Haute
Hancock County
Lebanon
Wichita
Topeka
Wichita
. Plymouth
Baltimore , ? '', ;
";,.>> . ' :*"- . "" - - '
/-Annapolis
Rose Center
Date
Deleted
12/30/93
09/22/89
03/07/86
04/18/88
09/10/91
03/07/86
03/22/93
09/02/94
03/17/89
06/28/95
02/21/89
02/08/93
09/01/88
09/01/88
04/04/95
12/30/82
10/21/93
10/06/93
08/31/95
12/23/92
02/11/91
02/11/91
02/11/91
09/10/91
10/14/92
11/09/93
01/06/92
- J1/1V/93
.-" ', '- - f ' *C ~.' : ."-" V" ~^' ''- -'
" ; ^04/18/88
04/19/95
16
-------
Sites Deleted from the NPL
September 1995
st
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MO
MS
NC
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NM
NY
.NY,
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
Site Name
Charlevoix Municipal Well
Gratiot County Golf Course
Kent City Mobile Home Park
Metal Working Shop
Whitehall Municipal Wells
Adrian Municipal Well Field
Boise Cascade/Onan Corp. /Medtronics, Inc.
Dakhue Sanitary Landfill
Koch Refining Co./N-Ren Corp.
Morris Arsenic Dump
Olmsted County Sanitary Landfill
Union Scrap Iron & Metal Co.
North-U Drive Well Contamination
Ualcotte Chemical Co. Warehouses
PCB Spills
Beach wood/Berk ley Wells '.
Cooper Road
Friedman Property
Jackson Township Landfill
Krysowaty Farm
M&T Delisa Landfill
Monroe Township Landfill
Ringuood Nines/Landfill
Pagano Salvage
BEC Trucking
BioClinical Laboratories, Inc.
C & J Disposal Leasing Co. Dump
Kenmark Textile' Corp. .
Radium Chemical Co., inc. <;,
Suffern Village Well Field .
Wide Beach Development
Location
Charlevoix
. St. Louis
Kent City
Lake Ann
Whitehall
Adrian ,
Fridley
Cannon 'Falls
Pine Bend
Morris
Oronoco
Minneapolis
Springfield
Greenville
243 Miles of Roads
Berkley Township
Voorhees Township
Upper Freehold Twp
Jackson Township
Hillsborough
Asbury Park
.Monroe Township
Ringuood Borough
Los Lunas
Town of Vestal
Bohemia
Hamilton
Farmingdale
New York City ; - _'
Village of Suffern
Brant
Date
Deleted
12/02/93
09/08/83
03/20/95
12/23/92
02/11/91
12/30/92
02/15/95
07/24/95
06/15/95
03/07/86
02/15/95
09/10/91
09/08/94
12/30/82
03/07/86
01/06/92
02/22/89
03/07/86
09/13/95
02/22/89
03/21/91
05/01/94
11/02/94
10,14/92
10/14/92
10/11/94
09/20/94
, 05/01/°5
: 03/24/95
; \ 05/28/93
08/30/94
17
-------
Sites Deleted from the NPL
September 1995
st
OH
OR
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
SC
TT
TX
TX
VA
VA
UA
WA
UA
UA
UA
UI
Site Name
Chemical & Minerals Reclamation
Allied Plating, Inc.
Enterprise Avenue
Lansdowne Radiation Site
Lehigh Electric & Engineering Co;
Presque Isle
Reeser's Landfill
Voortman Farm
Uade (ABM)
West line Site
Independent Nail Co.
PCB Uastes
Crystal City Airport
Harris (Farley Street)
Matthews Electroplating
Suffolk City Landfill
Fort Lewis (Landfill No. 5)
Hamilton Island Landf ill(USA/COE)
Pesticide Lab (Yakima)
Toftdahl Drums
Yakima Plating Co.
Waste Research & Reclamation Co.
Location
Cleveland
Portland
Phi lade I phi a
Lansdowne
Old Forge Borough
Erie
Upper Macungie Twp
Upper Saucon Twp
Chester
West line
Beaufort
Pacific Trust Terr
Crystal City
Houston
Roanoke County
Suffolk
Tacoma
North Bonneville
Yakima
Brush Prairie
Yakima
Eau Claire
Date
Deleted
12/30/82
11/14/94
03/07/86
09/10/91
03/07/86
.02/13/89
05/31/90
05/31/89
03/23/89
10/14/92
04/03/95
03/07/86
03/23/95
04/18/88
01/19/89
01/24/95
05/22/95
05/25/95
09/01/93
12/23/88
08/23/94
02/05/93
Number of sites deleted: 84
18
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites Per State/Territory
(by New Final Sites)
September 1995
State/Territory
Kansas
Maine
New Jersey
Tennessee
Texas
Virgin Islands
Maryland
Pennsylvania
Alabama
Alaska
American Samoa
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Commonwealth of Marianas
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Guam .
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Trust Territories
Utah
Vermont ,
Virginia
Washington .
West Virginia ,
Wisconsin ':""'.
Wyoming .'.-'.'
New
Gen
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
v 0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
. o
0
0
0
F i na I
Fed
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 '
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
Gen
10
8
100
14
25
1
8
95
9
2
0
7
12
69
13
0
14
18
0
48
11
1
1
6
33
32
16
19
13
22
74
.34
2
19
8
8
1,
16
8
76
21
2
31
9
9
8
10
23
2
0
8
8
18
35 .
4
\ 40
2
Final.
Fed
1
3
6
3
4
0
5
6
3
6
0
3
0
23
3
0
1
1
0
5
2
1
3
2
4
0
1
1
1
8
0
3
0
3
0
1
' 0
1
2
4
2
0
3
1
2
1
2
2
1
0
4
0
6
18
2
o ,
1
Total Proposed
Gen
1 '
1 .
2 ,
. 0
0
1
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
4
2
0
0
0
0
3
1
0
0
2
1
1
1
0
3
0
3
0
2
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
4
. 0
0
0
1
1
0
Fed
1 .
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o: :
0
0
Tota
13
12
108
18
29
2
14 .
103
13
8
0
10
12
96
18
0
15
19
0
56
14
2
4
10
38
33
18
20
17
30
78
37
4
22
9
10
1
17
11
81
23
2
38
11
12
9
12
25
4
0
16
8
24
53
-. ' '7-'
Hi ',
3
Total
1083
155
47
1290
19
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by EPA Region)
September 1995
Final
Reg
1
2
x
3
4
5
6
. -V-
State/Territory
Connecticut
Massachusetts
Maine
New Hampshire
Rhode Island
Vermont
New Jersey
New York
Puerto Rico
Virgin Islands
District of Columbia
Delaware
Maryland
Pennsylvania
Virginia
West Virginia
Alabama
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
Mississippi
North Carolina
South Carolina
Tennessee
Illinois
Indiana
Michigan
Minnesota
Ohio
Wisconsin
Arkansas
Louisiana
New .Mexico
Oklahoma
Texas . '
Gen
14
22
7
16
10
8
77
99
76
8
0
183
0
18
8
95
18
4
143
9
48
11
19
2
21
23
13
146
33
32
74
34
31
40
244
12
13
8
* 9
24
Fed
1
8
3
1
2
0
15
6
4
1
i 0
11
0
1
4
5
6
2
18
3
5
2
1
0
2
2
3
18
4
0
0
3
3
0
10
0
1
2
1
4
Proposed
Gen
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
3
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
1
4
0
0
2
0
0
1
8
0
1
1
0
2
0
4
0
3
1
1
1
Fed
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
2
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
Total
15
. 30
11
17
12
8
93
106
80
9
2
197
0
19
14
102
24
6
165
13
57
13
20
4
23
25
18
173
37
33
76
37
38
40
261
12
17
11
11
29
66
80
20
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by EPA Region)
September 1995
Reg State/Territory
7 Iowa
Kansas
Missouri
Nebraska
Colorado
Montana
North Dakota
South Dakota
Utah
Wyoming
American Samoa
Arizona
California
Guam
Hawaii
Nevada
Trust Territories
10
Alaska
Idaho
Oregon
Washington
F i na I
Gen
16
9
19
8
52
13
8
2
2
8
2
35
Marianas 0
0
7
69
1
1
1
s 0
79
2
6
9
35
Fed
1
1
3
1
6
3
0
0
1
4
1
9
0
0
3
23
1
3
0
0
30
6
2
2
"18
Proposed
. Gen
1
.1
0
1
-
3
2
1
0
1
4
0
8
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
4
0
2
1
0
Fed
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
18
12
22
10
~~"~ f
62
18
9
2
4Vi
16
3
52
0
0
10
96
2
4
1
0
113
8
10
12
53
52
28
83
Total
1077 153
42
1279
21
-------
FEDERAL REGISTER
NOTICES
Date/Citation/Number of
Sites
Date
October 23, 1981
115 ("Interim Priorities List")1
July 23, 1982
45 ("Expanded Eligibility List")1
December 30, 1982 (47 FR 58476)
418 (proposal of first NPL, including 153 of 160 sites
announced previously)
March 4, 1983 (48 FR 9311)
1 (proposal of Times Beach, Missouri)
September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40658)
406 (promulgation of first NPL; 1 proposed site split into 2
sites; 1 site deleted; 6 proposed sites dropped; 7 sites remain
proposed)
September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40674)
133 (Proposed Rule #1)
May 8, 1984 (49 FR 19480)
4 (promulgation of 4 San Gabriel Valley Sites in California,
part of Proposed Rule #1)
September 21, 1984 (49 FR 37070)
128 (promulgation of 123 Proposed Rule #1 sites and 5 from
original proposal; 4 proposed sites dropped)
October 15, 1984 (49 FR 40320)
244, including 36 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #2)
February 14, 1985 (50 FR 6320)
2 (promulgation of Glen Ridge and Montclair/West Orange
Radium Sites in New Jersey, part of Proposed Rule #2)
April 10, 1985 (50 FR 14115)
32, including 6 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #3)
September 16, 1985 (50 FR 37630)
1 (promulgation of. L^nsdowne Radiation Site in Pennsylvania,
part of Proposed Rule #3) _- ' ',.' \: '"'''' ; - : : / ; }.
September 18, 1985 (50 FR 37950)
41, including 3 Federal facility sites and one reproposed site
(Proposed I Rule #4)
Number of Sites
Final
406
410
538
538
540
540
541
541
Proposed
115
160
418
419
140
136
4
248
246
278
".'<' 277 /,.:'';
318
Total
115
160
418
419
546
546
542
786
786
818
818
859
22
-------
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
(continued)
Date
June 10, 1986 (51 FR 21054)
170 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #1-4; 8 sites
deleted)
June 10, 1986 (51 FR 21099)
45, including 2 Federal Facility sites (Proposed Rule #5)
June 10, 1986 (51 FR 21109)
proposed RCRA policy; reopening of comment period for
5 sites
January 22, 1987 (52 FR 2492)
64, including 1 Federal facility site (Proposed Rule #6)
February 25, 1987 (52 FR 5578)
Availability of information
May 13, 1987 (52 FR 17991)
proposed RCRA policy for Federal facility sites
July 22, 1987 (52 FR 27620)
99 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-6)
July 22, 1987 (52 FR 27643)
7 (reproposal of Federal facility sites)
June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23978)
43 (reproposal of RCRA sites)
June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23988)
229, including 14 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #7)
August 9, 1988 (53 FR 30002/30005) .
RCRA policy statements
March 13, 1989 (54 FR 10512)
(8. Federal facility sites)
and
March 31, 1989 (54 FR 13296)
101 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-7;
4 proposed sites dropped)
MaySv 1989 (54 FR 19526) ?
46xpjfq^«i««M#8)v r*? v ; " ;<;' . .; ; ";,- : ; ;' ; , '
JnIy;U|l!W9^5VF^2>82b) * f(. ::'^\ . \ .''' v?
52 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #9)
August 16, 1989 (54 FR 33846)
2 (proposal of AT SDR sites)
Number of Sites
Final
703
703
802
7993 ,
8903
890^;
889s
889
Proposed
185
2482
/
149
378
273
'./r:?*-2$$ >-^";
'"' "335 '";
337
Total
888
951
951
1,177
1,163
,:;x"-.t 1,173
. ^ *.-.; -
1,224
1,226
23
-------
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
(continued)
Date
October 4, 1989 (54 FR 41000/41015)
93 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-8; 31
proposed sites dropped)
October 26, 1989 (54 FR 43778)
25, including 2 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #10, last
proposed rule under original HRS)
November 21, 1989 (54 FR 48184)
29 (promulgation of 27 Federal facility sites from Proposed Rule
#9 and 2 ATSDR sites; expansion of 1 Fedt.al facility site)
February 21, 1990 (55 FR 6154)
71 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-7, 9;
1 proposed site dropped)
March 14, 1990 (55 FR 9688)
1 (promulgation of United Heckathorn Co., Richmond,
California, part of Proposed Rule #10)
August 30, 1990 (55 FR 35502)
106 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2, 5-10; 10
proposed sites dropped)
February 11, 1991 (56 FR 5598)
6 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2, 5-7, 10;
14 proposed sites dropped) (last final rule under original HRS)
May 9, 1991 (56 FR 21460)
1 (proposal of ATSDR site)
July 29, 1991 (56 FR 35840)
22 (Proposed Rule #11, firsi proposed rule under revised HRS)
September 25, 1991 (56 FR 48438)
1 (promulgation of ATSDR site)
February 7, 1992 (57 FR 4824)
30 (Proposed Rule #12)
October 14, 1992 (57 FR 47181)
33 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #1 1 and 12);
first final rule under revised HRS
October 14, 1992 (57 FR%7204) " :'^; '. * ".,- ' " "' '. ' .' '" i
9 (Proposed Rule;#l3) - - "' ; ' ; ='. . ..
May 10, 1993 (58 FR 27507)
26 (Proposed Rule #14)
P
Final
9813
981
1,010
1,081
1,082
1.1873
1.1893
1.1883
1,188
1.1853
1.1833
- i,2083-4 ;
t
1.2023-4 .
dumber of Sit
Proposed
213
,238
209
137
136
20
0
1
23
22
52
' ' .'.-''
' '..-.-'v ..;28x-' ; : .-
: -' -.--"
. .-/-,-- ' - -. v. '_ - '
54
es
Total
1,194
1,219
1,219
1,218
1,218
1,207
1,189
1,189
1,211
1,207
1,235
: *'., 1,236
"'" * " '- * ,
1,256
24
-------
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
(continued)
Date
June 23, 1993 (58 FR 34018)
17 (Proposed Rule #15)
January 18, 1994 (59 FR 2568)
26 (Proposed Rule #16)
February 23, 1994 (59 FR 8724)
1 (promulgation of ALCOA (Point Comfort)/Lavaca Bay, Point
Comfort, Texas) ,
May 31, 1994 (59 FR 27989)
42 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #11-16)
August 23, 1994 (59 FR 43314)
10 (Proposed Rule #17)
December 16, 1994 (59 FR 65206)
18 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #12-14, 16 and
17)
February 13, 1995 (60 FR 8212)
9 (Proposed Rule #18)
April 25, 1995 (60 FR 20330)
4 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #11, 15, and 16)
May 26, 1995 (60 FR 27896)
1 (promulgation of site from Proposed Rule #18)
September 1995
12 (Proposed Rule #19)
September 1995
8 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #12, 14, 17, and
18)
Number of Sites
Final
1.1993-4
1.1923
1,191*
1,232s
1,232
1,242s
1,24 13
1,238s
1,237s
1 2383-4
Proposed
71
97
96
54
64
46
55
50
49
52
Total
1,270
1,289
1,287
1,286
1296
1,288
1,296
1,288
1,286
1,^90
'No Federal Register notice.
'Silver Creek Tailings, Park City, UT, removed October 17, 1986 as required by CERCLA Section 118(p).
'Reflects site(s) deleted since last rule.
4Reflects site(s) removed since last rule.
'Reflects sites(s) withdrawn since last rule. ' -
25
------- |