United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Publication 9320.7-051 Solid Waste and September 1995 Emergency Response ^^M. ' vxEPASupplementary Materials: National Priorities List, Proposed Rule and Final Rule Office of Emergency end Remedial Response Hazardous Site Evaluation Division (5204G) Intermittent Bulletin Volume 5, Number 2 (Proposed Rule) Volume 2, Number 3 (Final Rule) The National Priorities List (NPL) informs the public of uncontrolled hazardous waste sites that warrant further investigation to determine if they pose risks to human health or the environment. Such sites are eligible for long-term "remedial action" financed under the Trust Fund established by the Comprehen- sive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA). In October 1990, CERCLA was extended to September 30, 1994. An appropriation by Congress for Fiscal Year 1995 authorized Superfund to continue to operate. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has the primary responsibility for managing the Superfund program. Table of Contents How Sites Are Placed on the NPL 2 Statutory Requirements and Listing Policies 3 NPL Status (September 1995) . . 4 How Sites Are Deleted From the NPL 5 Removing Proposed Sites , 5 Key Dates In Superfund 6 Lists and Data Summaries 7 Federal Facilities Section (by State) ....... 8 Proposed Sites (by State) 13 Sites Deleted from the NPL .'. . . . . . 16 ^ NPL Sites Per State/Territory (by New Final Sites) ... .',-.. . . . . V. . .-.-;. -.-..'. . 19 NPL Sites Per EPA Region 20 Federal Register Notices 22 ------- HOW SITES ARE PLACED ON THE NPL EPA uses informal rulemaking to place sites on the NPL. Sites are first proposed to the NPL hi the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the sites (typically for 60 days), responds to the comments, and finally places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Section 300.425(c) of the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP), the Federal regulation by which CERCLA is implemented (55 FR 8845, March 8, 1990), provides three mechanisms for placing sites on the NPL. The primary mechanism is EPA's Hazard Ranking System (HRS). The original HRS, developed in 1982, evaluated the relative threat a site posed to human health or the environment over five "pathways," or routes of exposure. The HRS score was based on the evaluation of three pathways through which contaminants can migrate: ground water, surface water, and air. The other two pathways, direct contact and fire/explosion, were evaluated to determine the need for immediate removal (emergency) action. HRS scores ranged from 0 to 100. An HRS score of 28.50 was selected as the cutoff point for the first proposed NPL to identify at least 400 sites, the minimum suggested by CERCLA. On December 14, 1990 (55 FR 51532), EPA revised the HRS, as required by SARA. The revised HRS became effective on March 14, 1991. It is a more comprehensive and accurate scoring system than the original HRS and may add new types of sites to the NPL. The revised HRS retains the same cutoff score and basic approach as the original HRS, while incorporating SARA requirements as well as improvements identified as necessary by EPA and the public. The revised HRS retains the ground water, surface water, and air pathways,.drops the direct contact and fire/explosion pathways, and adds a fourth pathway, soil exposure. All four can be used to calculate the site score. .'" The second mechanism for placing sites on the NPL allows States or Territories to designate one top- priority site regardless of score. Of the 57 States and Territories,- 40 have designated top-priority sites. Seven of these sites have been dele.-d from the NPL because no further response was necessary. The third mechanism allows listing a site if it meets all three of these requirements: The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) of the U.S. Public Health Service has issued a health advisory that recommends removing people from the site. EPA determines the site poses a significant threat to public health. EPA anticipates it will be more cost- effective to use its remedial authority (available only at NPL sites) than to use its emergency removal authority to respond to the site. Twelve sites have been proposed to the NPL on the basis of ATSDR advisories: Seven are on the NPL: Forest Glen Mobile Home Subdivision, Niagara Falls, NY, and Radium Chemical Co., Inc., New York City, NY (54 FR . 48184, November 21, 1989); White Chemical Corp., Newark NJ (56 FR 48438, September 25, 1991); Austin Avenue Radiation Site, Delaware County, PA (57 FR 47181, October 14, 1992); Lower Ecorse Creek Dump, Wyandotte, MI (59 FR 27989, May 31, 1994); Raymark Industries, Inc., Stratford, CT (59 FR 2568 January '. >i 1995); and Tennessee Products, Chattanooga, TN (September 1995). One, Lansdowne Radiation Site, Lansdowne, PA has been deleted because all appropriate response has been completed (56 FR 46121, September 10, 1991). One, Quail Run Mobile Manor, Gray Summit, MO (48 FR 40674, September 8, 1983) was dropped from .''further consideration on February 11, 1991 (56 FR 5598). Because of an EPA removal action, ATSDR had rescinded its health advisory. ------- Three, Aircraft Components (D&L Sales), Benton Harbor, MI; H&K Sales, Belding, MI; and Little Valley, Little Valley, NY, were proposed in this rule (September 1995). STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS AND LISTING POLICIES CERCLA restricts EPA's authority to respond to certain sites by expressly excluding some substances - - petroleum, for example from the definition of "release." In addition, as a matter of policy, EPA may choose not to use CERCLA because the Federal government can undertake or enforce cleanup under other laws, thus preserving CERCLA funds for sites not covered by other laws. EPA has chosen not to use CERCLA for certain types of sites regulated by Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). However, if EPA later determines that sites not listed as a matter of policy are not being properly responded to, it may consider placing them on the NPL. RCRA-Related Sites When the first final NPL was promulgated in September 1983, EPA announced certain listing policies relating to sites that might qualify for the NPL. One of these policies involved facilities subject to RCRA Subtitle C. EPA's policy was generally not to place on the NPL, RCRA "regulated units" (for example, land disposal units that received hazardous waste after the effective date of the RCRA land disposal regulations) because EPA can require the owner/operator to c'^an up undei Rf!RA, The RCRA cleanup process and standards are similar to those under CERCLA, ensuring that all actions taken will protect human health and the environment. In November 1984, the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) to RCRA were enacted, expanding EPA's authority to require corrective measures under Subtitle C. As a result of this broadened RCRA authority, EPA revised its policy for placing non-Federal RCRA-regulated sites on the , rNPLYl-aj^^dn June: 1Q,= 1986 (54 FR iZlQS?) announced that facilities subject to RCRA Subtitle C corrective action authorities would be placed on the .NPL if one or more of these conditions exists: The facilities are owned by persons who have demonstrated an inability to finance appropriate corrective action by invoking bankruptcy laws. The facilities have lost authorization to operate (also known as the Loss of Interim Status, or LOIS provision), and there are additional indications that the owner or operator is unwilling to undertake corrective action. The facilities have not lost authorization to operate but have a clear history of unwillingness to undertake corrective action. These situations are determined on a case- by-case basis. On June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23978) and October 9, 1989 (54 FR 41000), EPA announced additional components of the NPL/RCRA policy. As a matter of policy, EPA will list four additional categories of RCRA-related sites: Facilities that were treating, storing, or disposing of Subtitle C hazardous waste after November 19, 1980, but that did not file a "Part A," the initial part of the permit application, by that date as required and have little or no history of compliance with RCRA. EPA believes that these non- or late filers, although they are technically subject to RCRA, are not' likely to be cleaned up expeditiously under RCRA and so should be on the NPL. However, if such facilities have complied with RCRA, EPA may consider whether listing is necessary. Facilities with permits for the treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous waste issued before enactment of HSWA, and whose owners/operators will not voluntarily modify the permit. Pre-HSWA permittees are not required to take corrective action for releases. Under RCRA Section 3004(u), EPA does not have the authority to modify a pre-HSWA permit'ibr: corrective action . untU me permit is reissued. ' ------- NPL Status (September 1995) Number of Sites on Final NPL Total: 1,238 General Superfund Section: 1,083 Federal Facilities Section: 1 55 Number of Sites Remaining on Proposed NPL Total: 52 General Superfund Section: 47 Federal Facilities Section: 5 Total Number of Final and Proposed Sites 1,290 Number of Sites on the Construction Completion List 304 Number of Sites Deleted from Final NPL 84 Facilities that filed a Part A permit application for treatment, storage, or disposal of Subtitle C hazardous waste as a precautionary measure only. Such facilities - for example, generators, transporters, or recyclers of hazardous waste ~ are not subject to Subtitle C corrective action authorities. These are referred to as protective filers. Facilities that at one time treated or stored Subtitle C hazardous waste but have since converted to generator-only status (i.e., facilities that now store hazardous waste for 90 days or less) or any of'er hazardous waste activity not requiring Interim Status. These facilities, whose Part A permit applications have been withdrawn with EPA or State approval, are referred to as converters. EPA believes it has the authority under RCRA Section 3008(u) to compel corrective action at such facilities. However, RCRA's corrective action program currently focuses primarily on treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (due to permitting deadlines in RCRA). Therefore,' this category should be.on the NPL to ensure expeditious cleanup. However, if a consent order requiring remedial action is in effect, a converter need not be listed. Federal Facility Sites CERCLA Section 120(a) requires that Federal facilities be subject to and comply with CERCLA in the same manner as any nongovernmental entity. CERCLA Section lll(e)(3), however, generally prohibits use of the Trust Fund for remedial actions at Federally owned facilities. Thus, Federal agencies must use their own funds for cleanup. Federal sites are listed in a separate section of Appendix B, rather than in the General Superfund Section. Because most Federal facilities have RCRA- regulated units within their boundaries, EPA Determined that a separate NPL/RCRA policy should be adopted for Federal facilities. AD a result, on March 13, 1989 (54 FR 10520), EPA announced it would place on the NPL those sites located on Federally owned or operated facilities that reel the NPL eligibility requirements e.g., HRS scores of 28.50 or greater - even if the Federal facility also is subject to the corrective action authorities of RCRA Subtitle C. Cleanup, if appropriate, could then proceed at those sites under either CERCLA or RCRA. The policy is based on several considerations: ',,,'./ :.'"", Congress clearly intended that Federal facility sites should be on the NPL. Strict application of the non-Federal NPL/RCRA policy would exclude virtually ------- all Federal facility sites from the NPL because they would not likely meet any of the criteria necessary for listing (inability to pay as evidenced by invocation of bankruptcy laws or demonstrated unwillingness to comply with RCRA). Placing RCRA-regulated Federal sites on the NPL serves the primary purpose of listing Federal facility sites to advise the public of the status of Federal government cleanup efforts. Listing these sites helps Federal agencies set priorities and focus cleanup efforts on those sites that present the most serious problem. Radioactive Release Sites CERCLA Section 101(22) excludes several types of releases of radioactive materials from the statutory definition of "release." These releases are therefore not eligible for CERCLA response actions or the NPL. The exclusions apply to (1) releases of source, by-product, or special nuclear material from a nuclear incident if these releases are' subject to financial protection requirements under Section 170 of the Atomic Energy Act and (2) any releases of source, by-product, or special nuclear material from any processing site designated under the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978. Accordingly, such radioactive releases have not been considered eligible for the NPL. As a policy matter, EPA has also chosen not to list releases of source, by-product, or special nuclear material from any facility with a current license issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), on the grounds that NRC has full authority to require cleanup of releases from such facilities. EPA will, however, list releases from facilities that hold a current license issued by a State pursuant to an agreement between the State and die NRC under Section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act. Facilities whose licenses are no longer in effect are also considered for listing. HOW SITES ARE DELETED NPU: i ,<. ;.-*<.. EPA may delete a final NPL site if it determines that no further response is required to protect human health or the environment. Under Section 300.425(e) of the NCP (55 FR 8845, March 8, 1990,) a site may be deleted where no further response is apprcpriate if EPA determines that one of the following criteria has been met: EPA, in conjunction with the State, has determined that responsible or other parties have implemented all appropriate response action required. EPA, in consultation with the State, has determined that all appropriate Superfund- financed response under CERCLA has been implemented, and that no further response by responsible parties is appropriate. A remedial investigation has shown that the release poses no significant threat to public health or the environment, and, therefore remedial measures are not appropriate. Since 1986, EPA has followed these procedures for deleting a site from' the NPL: The Regional Administrator approves a "close-out report" which establishes that all appropriate response action has been taken or that no action is required. The Regional Office obtains State concurrence. EPA publishes a notice of intent to delete in the Federal Register and hi a major newspaper near the community involved. A public comment period is provided. EPA responds to the comments and, if the site continues to warrant deletion, publishes a deletion notice in the Federal Register. Sites that have been deleted from the NPL remain eligible for further Superfund-financed remedial action in the unlikely event that conditions in the future warrant such action. REMOVING PROPOSED SITES As of September 1995; 78, sites have been proposed fprthe NPL but subse^uenUy removed from further consideration, most of; them because their final HRS scores were below the 28.50 cutoff or they are subject to RCRA Subtitle C. Three of the sites ' were reproposed on February 7, 1992 (57 FR 4824) after being rescored with the revised HRS. ------- Key Dates in Superfund Legislation Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) enacted December 11, 1980; Trust Fund of $1.6 billion authorized over 5 years CERCLA amended by Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) enacted October 17, 1986; Trust Fund of $8.5 billion authorized over 5 years CERCLA extended to September 30, 1994; an additional $5.1 billion authorized Federal regulation implementing Superfund: National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) Revised July 16, 1982 (47 FR 31180) to incorporate CERCLA requirements Revised March 8, 1990 (55 FR 8666) in response to CERCLA Section 105, amended by SARA Hazard Ranking System Promulgated July 16, 1982 (47 FR 31180) as Appendix A of the NCP Revised December 14, 1990 (55 FR 51532) in response to CERCLA Section 105(c), added by SARA; effective date March 14, 1991 National Prioi.ties List Promulgated September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40658) as Appendix B of the NCP Must be updated at least annually Last sites proposed under original MRS promulgated February 11, 1991 (56 FR 5598); Construction Completion category activated (56 FR 5634) First sites proposed under revised MRS July 29,1991 (56 FR 35840) First sites added to N PL under revised HRS October 14, 1992 (57 FR 47181) » Construction Completion List activated March 2, 1993 (58 FR 12142) ------- LISTS AND DATA SUMMARIES ------- ------- National Priorities List Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State) September 1995 St Site Name City/County Date Proposed Final AK Adak Naval Air Station AK Eielson Air Force Base AK Elmendorf Air Force Base AK Fort Richardson (USARMY) AK Fort Wainwright , , AK Standard Steel&Metals Salvage YardCUSDOT 6 Final + 0 Proposed = 6 AL Alabama Army Ammunition Plant AL Anniston Army Depot (SE Industrial Area) AL Redstone Arsenal (USARMY/NASA) 3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3 AZ Luke Air Force Base AZ Williams Air Force Base AZ Yuma Marine Corps Air Station 3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3 CA Barstou Marine Corps Logistics Base CA Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base CA Castle Air Force Base CA Concord Naval Weapons Station CA Edwards Air Force Base CA El Toro Marine Corps Air Station CA Fort Ord . CA George Air Force Base CA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (NASA) CA LEHR/Old Campus Landfill (USDOE) CA Lawrence Liver-more Lab Site 300 (USDOE) CA Lawrence Livermore Laboratory (USDOE) CA March Air Force Base CA Mather Air Force Base CA McClellan Air Force Base (GW Contam) CA Moffett Naval Air Station CA Norton Air Force Base CA Riverbank Army.Ammunition Plant CA Sacramento Army Depot CA Sharpe Army Depot CA Tracy Defense Depot (USARMY) CA Travis Air Force Base CA Treasure Island Naval Station-Hun Pt An 23 Final + 0 Proposed = 23 CO Air Force Plant PJKS CO Rocky Flats Plant (USDCE) CO Rocky Mountain Arsenal (USARMY) 3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3 CT . New London Submarine Base 1 >iriat * 0 Proposed = 1 . DE Dover Air Force Base " 1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1 Adak . 10/92 05/94 Fairbanks N Star Boro 07/89 11/89 Greater Anchorage Bor 07/89 08/90 Anchorage 06/93 05/94 Fairbanks N Star Boro 07/89 08/90 Anchorage 07/89 08/90 Childersburg 10/84 07/87 Anniston 10/84 03/89 Huntsville 06/93 05/94 Glendale 07/89 08/90 Chandler 07/89 11/89 Yuma 06/88 02/90 Barstow San Diego County Merced Concord Kern County El Tore Marina Victorville Pasadena Davis Livermore Livermore Riverside Sacramento Sacramento Sunnyvale San Bernardino Riverbank Sacransento Lathrop Tracy Solano County San Francisco 07/89 07/89 10/84 02/92 07/89 06/88 07/89 07/89 02/92 01/94 07/89 10/84 07/89 10/84 10/84 04/85 10/84 06/88 10/84 10/84 07/89 07/89 07/89 11/89 11/89 07/87 12/94 08/90 02/90 02/90 02/90 10/92 05/94 08/90 07/87 11/89 07/87 07/87 07/87 07/87 02/90 07/87 07/87 08/90 11/89 11/89 Waterloo Golden Adams County New London Dover 07/89 10/84 10/84 11/89 10/89 07/87 10/89 08/90 10/84" 03/89 ------- National Priorities List Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State) September 1995 Date St Site Name FL Cecil Field Naval Air Station FL Homestead Air Force Base FL Jacksonville Naval Air Station FL Pensacola Naval Air Station FL Whiting Field Naval Air Station 5 Final + 0 Proposed = 5 GA Marine Corps Logistics Base GA Robins Air Force Base(Lf#4/Sludge lagoon 2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2 GU Andersen Air Force Base 1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1 HI Naval Computer & Telecommunications Area HI Pearl Harbor Naval Complex HI Schofield Barracks (USARMY) 3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3 IA Iowa Army Ammunition Plant 1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1 ID Idaho National Engineering Lab (USDOE) ID Mountain Home Air Force Base 2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2 IL Joliet Army Ammunition Plant (LAP Area) IL Joliet Army Ammunition Plant (Mfg Area) IL Sangamo Electric/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI IL Savanna Army Depot Activity 4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4 KS Fort Riley KS Sunflower Army Ammunition Plant 1 Final + 1 Proposed = 2 KY Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (USDOE) . 1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1 LA Louisiana Army Ammunition Plant 1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1 MA Fort Devens : MA Fort Devens-Sudbury Training Annex MA Jianscom Field/Hanscom Air Force Base MA Materials Technology Laboratory (USARMY) MA Natick Laboratory Army Research.D&E Cntr MA Naval Weapons Industrial Reserve Plant MA Otis Air National Guard (USAF) MA South Ueymouth Naval Air Station City/County Jacksonville Homestead Jacksonville Pensacola Milton Albany Houston County Yigo Oahu Pearl Harbor Oahu Middletown Idaho Falls Mountain Home Joliet Joliet Carterville Savanna Junction City DeSoto Paducah Doyline Fort Devens Middlesex County Bedford Watertbwn . -r . '-.' Natick .-- r - ' f : Bedford Falroouth - Ueymouth Proposed 07/89 07/89 07/89 07/89 01/94 07/89 10/84 02/92 01/94 07/91 07/89 07/89 07/89 07/89 04/85 10/84 10/84 10/84 - 07/89 02/95 05/93 10/84 07/89 07/89 05/93 06/93 05/93 06/93 07/89 06/93 Final 11/89 08/90 11/89 11/89 05/94 11/89 07/87 10/92 05/94 10/92 08/90 08/90 11/89 ' 08/90 03/89 07/87 07/87 03/89 08/90 . 05/94 03/89 11/89 02/90 05/94 05/94 05/94 05/94 11/89 05/94 8 Final + 0 Proposed = 8 ------- National Priorities List Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State) September 1995 St Site Name MD Aberdeen Proving Ground (Edgewood Area) MD Aberdeen Proving Ground(Michaelsville LF MD Beltsville Agricultural Research (USDA) MD. Indian Head Naval Surface Warfare Center MD Patuxent River Naval Air Station 5 Final + 0 Proposed = 5 ME Brunswick Naval Air Station ME Loring Air Force Base ME Portsmouth Naval Shipyard 3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3 MI -Wurtsmith Air Force Base 0 Final + 1 Proposed = 1 MN Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant MN New Brighton/Arden Hills/TCAAP (USARMY) MN Twin Cities Air Force Base(SAR Landfill) 3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3 MO Lake City Army Ammu. Plant (NW Lagoon) MO Weldon Spring Former Army Ordnance Works MO Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pi tts(USDOE) 3 Final + 0 Proposed =3 NC Camp Lejeune Military Res. (USNAVY) NC Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station 2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2 NE Cornhusker Army Ammunition Plant 1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1 NH Pease Air Force Base 1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1 NJ Federal Aviation Admin. Tech. Center NJ Fort bix (Landfill Site) NJ Naval Air Engineering Center NJ Naval Weapons Station Earle (Site A) NJ Pica tinny Arsenal (USARMY) NJ W.R. Grace/Wayne Interim Storage (USDOE) 6 Final + 0 Proposed = 6 NM Cal West Metals (USSBA) NM Lee Acres Landfill (USDOI) r /,- 2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2 - _ NY Brookhaven National Laboratory (USDOE) NY Griff iss Air Force Base NY Plattsburgh Air Force Base City/County Edgewood Aberdeen Beltsville Indian Head St. Mary's County Brunswick Limestone Kittery losco County Fridley New Brighton ' Minneapolis Independence St. Charles County St. Charles County Ons low County Havelock Hall County Portsmouth/Newington Atlantic County Pemberton Township Lakehurst Colts Neck Rockaway Township Wayne Township Lemitar - Fermi ngt on / . " - % . . Upton :." . -.Rome' ' ' ' Plattsburgh Dati Proposed 04/85 04/85 05/93 02/95 01/94 10/84 07/89 . 06/93 01/94 07/89 12/82 01/87 10/84 07/89 10/84 06/88 08/94 10/84 07/89 07/89 10/84 09/85 10/84 07/89 09/83 06/88 06/88 07/89 10/84 07/89 s Final 02/90 10/89 05/94 09/95 05/94 07/87 02/90 05/94 11/89 09/83 07/87 07/87 02/90 07/87 10/89 12/94 07/87 02/90 08/90 07/87 07/87 08/90 02/90 09/84 03/89 08/90 11/89 07787 11/89 10 ------- National Priorities List Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State) September 1995 St Site Name Ci ty/County Date Proposed Final NY Seneca Army Depot 4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4 OH Air Force Plant 85 OH Feed Materials Production Center (USDOE) OH Hound Plant (USDOE) OH Rickenbacker Air National Guard (USAF) OH Wright-Patterson Air Force Base 3 Final + 2 Proposed = 5 OK Tinker Air Force(Soldier Cr/Bldg 300) 1 Final + 0 Proposed =1 OR Fremont Nat. Forest Uranium Mines (USDA) OR Umatilla Army Depot (Lagoons) 2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2 PA Letterkenny Army Depot (PDO Area) PA Letterkenny Army Depot (SE Area) PA Naval Air Development Center(8 Areas) PA Navy Ships Parts Control Center PA Tobyhanna Army Depot PA Willow Grove Naval Air & Air Res. Stn. 6 Final + 0 Proposed = 6 PR Naval Security Group Activity 1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1 RI Davisville Naval Construction Batt Cent RI Newport Naval Education/Training Center 2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2 SC Parris Island Marine Corps Recruit Depot SC Savannah River Site (USDOE) 2 Final + 0 Proposed - 2 SO Ellsworth Air Force Base 1 Final + 0 Proposed =1, TN Arnold Engineering Develop. Ctr. (USAF) TN Memphis Defense Depot (OLA) TN Milan Array Ammunition Plant TN Oak Ridge Reservation (USDOE) 3 Final>1 Proposed = 4 TX Air -Force Plant #4 (General Dynamics) TX1 Lone. Star AnnyAmraunition Plant ' ', fX ' Longhorn Army Ammunition Plant ..'-" TX .Pantex Plant (USDOE) .;' ':'-' .,' 4 Final * 0 Proposed - 4 Romulus 07/89 08/90 Columbus Fernald Miamisburg Lockbourne Dayton 01/94 07/89 07/89 01/94 06/88 11/89 11/89 10/89 Oklahoma City Lakeview Hermiston Franklin County Chambersbiirg Warminster Township Mechanicsburg Tobyhanna Willow Grove Sabana Seca North Kingston Newport Parris island Aiken Rapid Jity Tullahoma/Manchester Memphis Milan Oak Ridge Fort Worth ..... Texarkarta v. Karnack' Pantex Village 04/85 07/87 06/93 04/95 10/84 07/87 04/85 03/89 10/84 07/87 06/86 10/89 01/94 05/94 07/89 08/90 08/94 09/95 06/88 10/89 07/89 11/89 07/89 11/89 08/94 12/94 07/89 11/89 10/89 08/90 08/94 02/92 10/92 10/84 07/87 07/89 . 11/89 08/90 07/8> ; 08/90 07/91-105/94 11 ------- National Priorities List Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State) September 1995 st UT UT UT UT VA VA VA VA VA VA Site Name Hill Air Force Base Monti cello Mill Tailings (USDOE) Ogden Defense Depot (DLA) Tooele Army Depot (North Area) 4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4 Defense General Supply Center (DLA) Fort Eustis (US Army) Langley Air Force Base/NASA Langley Cntr Marine Corps Combat Development Command Naval Surface Warfare - Dahlgren Naval .Weapons Station - Yorktown City/County Ogden Monti cello Ogden Tooele Chesterfield County Newport News Hampton Quant i co Dahlgren Yorktown Dat Proposed 10/84 07/89 10/84 10/84 10/84 01/94 05/93 05/93 02/92 02/92 e Final 07/87 11/89 07/87 08/90 07/87 12/94 05/94 05/94 10/92 10/92 . 6 Final + 0 Proposed = 6 WA American Lake Gardens/McChord AFB WA Bangor Naval Submarine Base WA Bangor Ordnance Disposal (USNAVY) WA Bonneville Power Admin Ross (USDOE) WA Fairchild Air Force Base (4 Waste Areas) WA Fort Lewis Logistics Center WA Hanford 100-Area (USDOE) WA Hanford 1100-Area (USDOE) WA Hanford 200-Area (USDOE) WA Hanford 300-Area (USDOE) WA Jackson Park Housing Complex (USNAVY) WA McChord Air Force Base (Wash Rack/Treat) WA Naval Air Station, Whidbey Is (Seaplane) WA Naval Air Station, Whidbey Island (Ault) WA Naval Undersea Warfare Station (4 Areas) WA Old Navy Dump/Manchester Lab(USEPA/NOAA) WA Port Hadlock Detachment (USNAVY) WA Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Complex 18 Final + 0 Proposed = 18 WV Allegany Ballistics Laboratory (USNAVY) WV West Virginia Ordnance (USARMY) 2 Final + 0 Proposed - 2 WY F.E. Warren Air Force Base 1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1 155 Final + 5 Proposed = 160 Tacoma Silverdale Bremerton Vancouver Spokane County Tillicum Benton County Benton County Benton County Benton County Kitsap County Tacoma Whidbey Island Whidbey Island Keyport Manchester Indian Island Bremerton Mineral Point Pleasant Cheyenne 09/83 07/89 10/84 07/89 06/88 07/89 . 06/88 06/88 06/88 06/88 06/93 10/84 09/85 09/85 06/86 01/94 06/93 05/93 06/93 12/82 09/84 08/90 07/87 11/89 03/89 11/89 10/89 10/89 10/89 10/89 05/94 07/87 02/90 02/90 10/89 05/94 05/94 05/94 05/94 09/83 07/89 02/90 12 ------- National Priorities List Proposed Sites, by State September 1995 St Site Name Location Notes a AL CA CO GA ID IL IN LA General Superfund Sites Monarch Tile Manufacturing, Inc. 1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1 General Superfund Sites Cooper Drum Co. Del Amo Facility GBF, Inc., Dump Stoker Company 4 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 4 General Superfund Sites ASARCO, .,ic. (Globe Plant) Smeltertown Site 2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2 General Superfund Sites Breward County--21st Manor Dump Normandy Park Apartments Stauffer Chemical Co. (Tampa Plant) 3 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 3 General Superfund Sites LCP Chemicals Georgia 1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1 General Superfund Sites Waterloo Coal Gasification Plant 1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1 General Superfund Sites Blackbird Mine Triumph Mine Tailings Piles 2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2 General Superfund Sites Jennison Wright Corporation 1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1 General Superfund Sites U.S. Smelter & Lead Refinery Inc. 1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1 General Superfund Sites Wright Ground Water Contamination Federal Facility Sites Sunflower Army Ammunition Plant 1 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 2 General Superfund Sites Gulf State Utilities-North Ryan Street Lincoln Creosote Old Citgo Refinery (Bossier City) 3 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 3 General Superfund Sites Ordnance Products,' Inc. - "' 1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites - 1 General Superfund Sites Eastern Surplus Co. 1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1 Florence South Gate Los Angeles Antioch Imperial Denver Salida Fort Lauderdale Temple Terrace Tampa Brunswick Waterloo Lemhi County Triumph Granite City East Chicago Wright DeSoto Lake Charles Bossier City Bossier Cecil County* Meddybemps 13 ------- National Priorities List Proposed Sites, by State September 1995 St Site Name Location Notes a MI General Superfund Sites Aircraft. Components Inc. (D & L Sales) Bay City Middlegrounds H & K Sales Federal Facility Sites Wurtsmith Air Force Base 3 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 4 MS General Superfund Sites Chemfax, Inc. Potter Co. 2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2 MT General Superfund Sites Burlington Northern Livingston Complex 1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1 HE General Superfund Sites Bruno Co-op Association/Associated Prop 1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1 HJ General Superfund Sites Franklin Burn Uelsbach & General Gas Mantle (Camden) 2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2 NX General Superfund Sites Rinchem Co., Inc. 1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1 NY General Superfund.Sites Little Valley 1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1 ' OH General Superfund Sites Diamond Shamrock CorpCPainesvilie Works) Dover Chemical Corp. Federal Facility Sites Air Force Plant 85 Rickenbacker Air National Guard (USAF) 2 General Superfund Sites + 2 Federal Facility Sites = 4 ox General Superfund Sites National Zinc Corp. 1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1 OK GeneraI'Superfund Sites East Multnomah County Ground Wtr Contain. 1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites - 1 PA ' General Superfund Sites Breslube-Penn, Incorporated East Tenth Street 2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2 so General Superfund.Sites .. Annie Creek Mine Tailings : 1 General Superfund Sites * 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1 TH Federal Facility Sites ' Arnold Engineering Develop. Ctr. (USAF) ' 0 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 1 Benton Harbor Bay City Belding losco County Gulfport Wesson Livingston Bruno Franklin Township Camden arid Gloucester Albuquerque Little Valley Painesville Dover Columbus Lockbourne Bartlesvilie Multnomah County Coraopolis Marcus Hook LeadV / Tul lahoma/Harichester 14 ------- National Priorities List Proposed Sites, by State September 1995 St Site Name Location Notes a ur General Superfund Sites Kennecott (North Zone) Magna Kennecott (South Zone) Copperton Murray Smelter , Murray City Richardson Flat Tailings - Summit County 4 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 4 vi General Superfund Sites Island Chemical Corp/V.I. Chemical Corp St. Croix 1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites =1 wi General Superfund Sites Penta Wood Products Siren 1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1 wv General Superfund Sites Hani in-All ied-Oli,, Mounds vi lie 1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites =1 47 General Superfund Sites + 5 Federal Facility Sites = 52 aA = Based on issuance of health advisory by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (if scored, MRS score need not be > 28.50). S = State top priority (included among the 100 top priority sites regardless of score). 15 ------- ------- Sites Deleted from the NPL September 1995 st AL AR AS AZ CA CM CO CT DE FL FL FL FL FL FL GA IA IA IA ID IL IN IN IN KS KS KS MA MI Site Name Mowbray Engineering Co. Cecil Lindsey Taputinou Farm Mountain View Mobile Home Estates Jibboom Junkyard PCB Warehouse Woodbury Chemical Co. Revere Textile Prints Corp. New Castle Steel Alpha Chemical Corp. Parramore Surplus Pioneer Sand Co. Tri-CityOil Conservationist, Inc varsol Spill Wilson Concepts of Florida, Inc. Luminous Processes, Inc. Aidex Corp. LaBounty Site Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. Arrcom (Drexler Enterprises) Petersen Sand & Gravel International Minerals (E. Plant) Poer Farm Wedzeb Enterprises, Inc. Big River .Sand Co. Hydro-Flex Inc. Johns' Sludge Pond . Plymouth^Harbpr/Cannpn Engineering Corp. ;... Chemical /Metals Industrie*. inc.J; ': ". Middletown Road pim> Cemetery Dump : Location Greenville Newport Island of Tutila Globe Sacramento Saipan Commerce City Sterling New Castle County Galloway Mount Pleasant Warrington Tampa Miami Pompano Beach Athens Council Bluffs Charles City Mason City Rathdrum Litertyville Terre Haute Hancock County Lebanon Wichita Topeka Wichita . Plymouth Baltimore , ? '', ; ";,.>> . ' :*"- . "" - - ' /-Annapolis Rose Center Date Deleted 12/30/93 09/22/89 03/07/86 04/18/88 09/10/91 03/07/86 03/22/93 09/02/94 03/17/89 06/28/95 02/21/89 02/08/93 09/01/88 09/01/88 04/04/95 12/30/82 10/21/93 10/06/93 08/31/95 12/23/92 02/11/91 02/11/91 02/11/91 09/10/91 10/14/92 11/09/93 01/06/92 - J1/1V/93 .-" ', '- - f ' *C ~.' : ."-" V" ~^' ''- -' " ; ^04/18/88 04/19/95 16 ------- Sites Deleted from the NPL September 1995 st MI MI MI MI MI MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MO MS NC NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NJ NM NY .NY, NY NY NY NY NY Site Name Charlevoix Municipal Well Gratiot County Golf Course Kent City Mobile Home Park Metal Working Shop Whitehall Municipal Wells Adrian Municipal Well Field Boise Cascade/Onan Corp. /Medtronics, Inc. Dakhue Sanitary Landfill Koch Refining Co./N-Ren Corp. Morris Arsenic Dump Olmsted County Sanitary Landfill Union Scrap Iron & Metal Co. North-U Drive Well Contamination Ualcotte Chemical Co. Warehouses PCB Spills Beach wood/Berk ley Wells '. Cooper Road Friedman Property Jackson Township Landfill Krysowaty Farm M&T Delisa Landfill Monroe Township Landfill Ringuood Nines/Landfill Pagano Salvage BEC Trucking BioClinical Laboratories, Inc. C & J Disposal Leasing Co. Dump Kenmark Textile' Corp. . Radium Chemical Co., inc. <;, Suffern Village Well Field . Wide Beach Development Location Charlevoix . St. Louis Kent City Lake Ann Whitehall Adrian , Fridley Cannon 'Falls Pine Bend Morris Oronoco Minneapolis Springfield Greenville 243 Miles of Roads Berkley Township Voorhees Township Upper Freehold Twp Jackson Township Hillsborough Asbury Park .Monroe Township Ringuood Borough Los Lunas Town of Vestal Bohemia Hamilton Farmingdale New York City ; - _' Village of Suffern Brant Date Deleted 12/02/93 09/08/83 03/20/95 12/23/92 02/11/91 12/30/92 02/15/95 07/24/95 06/15/95 03/07/86 02/15/95 09/10/91 09/08/94 12/30/82 03/07/86 01/06/92 02/22/89 03/07/86 09/13/95 02/22/89 03/21/91 05/01/94 11/02/94 10,14/92 10/14/92 10/11/94 09/20/94 , 05/01/°5 : 03/24/95 ; \ 05/28/93 08/30/94 17 ------- Sites Deleted from the NPL September 1995 st OH OR PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA SC TT TX TX VA VA UA WA UA UA UA UI Site Name Chemical & Minerals Reclamation Allied Plating, Inc. Enterprise Avenue Lansdowne Radiation Site Lehigh Electric & Engineering Co; Presque Isle Reeser's Landfill Voortman Farm Uade (ABM) West line Site Independent Nail Co. PCB Uastes Crystal City Airport Harris (Farley Street) Matthews Electroplating Suffolk City Landfill Fort Lewis (Landfill No. 5) Hamilton Island Landf ill(USA/COE) Pesticide Lab (Yakima) Toftdahl Drums Yakima Plating Co. Waste Research & Reclamation Co. Location Cleveland Portland Phi lade I phi a Lansdowne Old Forge Borough Erie Upper Macungie Twp Upper Saucon Twp Chester West line Beaufort Pacific Trust Terr Crystal City Houston Roanoke County Suffolk Tacoma North Bonneville Yakima Brush Prairie Yakima Eau Claire Date Deleted 12/30/82 11/14/94 03/07/86 09/10/91 03/07/86 .02/13/89 05/31/90 05/31/89 03/23/89 10/14/92 04/03/95 03/07/86 03/23/95 04/18/88 01/19/89 01/24/95 05/22/95 05/25/95 09/01/93 12/23/88 08/23/94 02/05/93 Number of sites deleted: 84 18 ------- National Priorities List Final and Proposed Sites Per State/Territory (by New Final Sites) September 1995 State/Territory Kansas Maine New Jersey Tennessee Texas Virgin Islands Maryland Pennsylvania Alabama Alaska American Samoa Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Commonwealth of Marianas Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Guam . Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kentucky Louisiana Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Puerto Rico Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Trust Territories Utah Vermont , Virginia Washington . West Virginia , Wisconsin ':""'. Wyoming .'.-'.' New Gen 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . o 0 0 0 F i na I Fed 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Gen 10 8 100 14 25 1 8 95 9 2 0 7 12 69 13 0 14 18 0 48 11 1 1 6 33 32 16 19 13 22 74 .34 2 19 8 8 1, 16 8 76 21 2 31 9 9 8 10 23 2 0 8 8 18 35 . 4 \ 40 2 Final. Fed 1 3 6 3 4 0 5 6 3 6 0 3 0 23 3 0 1 1 0 5 2 1 3 2 4 0 1 1 1 8 0 3 0 3 0 1 ' 0 1 2 4 2 0 3 1 2 1 2 2 1 0 4 0 6 18 2 o , 1 Total Proposed Gen 1 ' 1 . 2 , . 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 3 0 3 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 4 . 0 0 0 1 1 0 Fed 1 . 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o: : 0 0 Tota 13 12 108 18 29 2 14 . 103 13 8 0 10 12 96 18 0 15 19 0 56 14 2 4 10 38 33 18 20 17 30 78 37 4 22 9 10 1 17 11 81 23 2 38 11 12 9 12 25 4 0 16 8 24 53 -. ' '7-' Hi ', 3 Total 1083 155 47 1290 19 ------- National Priorities List Final and Proposed Sites (by EPA Region) September 1995 Final Reg 1 2 x 3 4 5 6 . -V- State/Territory Connecticut Massachusetts Maine New Hampshire Rhode Island Vermont New Jersey New York Puerto Rico Virgin Islands District of Columbia Delaware Maryland Pennsylvania Virginia West Virginia Alabama Florida Georgia Kentucky Mississippi North Carolina South Carolina Tennessee Illinois Indiana Michigan Minnesota Ohio Wisconsin Arkansas Louisiana New .Mexico Oklahoma Texas . ' Gen 14 22 7 16 10 8 77 99 76 8 0 183 0 18 8 95 18 4 143 9 48 11 19 2 21 23 13 146 33 32 74 34 31 40 244 12 13 8 * 9 24 Fed 1 8 3 1 2 0 15 6 4 1 i 0 11 0 1 4 5 6 2 18 3 5 2 1 0 2 2 3 18 4 0 0 3 3 0 10 0 1 2 1 4 Proposed Gen 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 4 0 0 2 0 0 1 8 0 1 1 0 2 0 4 0 3 1 1 1 Fed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 Total 15 . 30 11 17 12 8 93 106 80 9 2 197 0 19 14 102 24 6 165 13 57 13 20 4 23 25 18 173 37 33 76 37 38 40 261 12 17 11 11 29 66 80 20 ------- National Priorities List Final and Proposed Sites (by EPA Region) September 1995 Reg State/Territory 7 Iowa Kansas Missouri Nebraska Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming American Samoa Arizona California Guam Hawaii Nevada Trust Territories 10 Alaska Idaho Oregon Washington F i na I Gen 16 9 19 8 52 13 8 2 2 8 2 35 Marianas 0 0 7 69 1 1 1 s 0 79 2 6 9 35 Fed 1 1 3 1 6 3 0 0 1 4 1 9 0 0 3 23 1 3 0 0 30 6 2 2 "18 Proposed . Gen 1 .1 0 1 - 3 2 1 0 1 4 0 8 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 1 0 Fed 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 18 12 22 10 ~~"~ f 62 18 9 2 4Vi 16 3 52 0 0 10 96 2 4 1 0 113 8 10 12 53 52 28 83 Total 1077 153 42 1279 21 ------- FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES Date/Citation/Number of Sites Date October 23, 1981 115 ("Interim Priorities List")1 July 23, 1982 45 ("Expanded Eligibility List")1 December 30, 1982 (47 FR 58476) 418 (proposal of first NPL, including 153 of 160 sites announced previously) March 4, 1983 (48 FR 9311) 1 (proposal of Times Beach, Missouri) September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40658) 406 (promulgation of first NPL; 1 proposed site split into 2 sites; 1 site deleted; 6 proposed sites dropped; 7 sites remain proposed) September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40674) 133 (Proposed Rule #1) May 8, 1984 (49 FR 19480) 4 (promulgation of 4 San Gabriel Valley Sites in California, part of Proposed Rule #1) September 21, 1984 (49 FR 37070) 128 (promulgation of 123 Proposed Rule #1 sites and 5 from original proposal; 4 proposed sites dropped) October 15, 1984 (49 FR 40320) 244, including 36 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #2) February 14, 1985 (50 FR 6320) 2 (promulgation of Glen Ridge and Montclair/West Orange Radium Sites in New Jersey, part of Proposed Rule #2) April 10, 1985 (50 FR 14115) 32, including 6 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #3) September 16, 1985 (50 FR 37630) 1 (promulgation of. L^nsdowne Radiation Site in Pennsylvania, part of Proposed Rule #3) _- ' ',.' \: '"'''' ; - : : / ; }. September 18, 1985 (50 FR 37950) 41, including 3 Federal facility sites and one reproposed site (Proposed I Rule #4) Number of Sites Final 406 410 538 538 540 540 541 541 Proposed 115 160 418 419 140 136 4 248 246 278 ".'<' 277 /,.:''; 318 Total 115 160 418 419 546 546 542 786 786 818 818 859 22 ------- FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES (continued) Date June 10, 1986 (51 FR 21054) 170 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #1-4; 8 sites deleted) June 10, 1986 (51 FR 21099) 45, including 2 Federal Facility sites (Proposed Rule #5) June 10, 1986 (51 FR 21109) proposed RCRA policy; reopening of comment period for 5 sites January 22, 1987 (52 FR 2492) 64, including 1 Federal facility site (Proposed Rule #6) February 25, 1987 (52 FR 5578) Availability of information May 13, 1987 (52 FR 17991) proposed RCRA policy for Federal facility sites July 22, 1987 (52 FR 27620) 99 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-6) July 22, 1987 (52 FR 27643) 7 (reproposal of Federal facility sites) June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23978) 43 (reproposal of RCRA sites) June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23988) 229, including 14 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #7) August 9, 1988 (53 FR 30002/30005) . RCRA policy statements March 13, 1989 (54 FR 10512) (8. Federal facility sites) and March 31, 1989 (54 FR 13296) 101 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-7; 4 proposed sites dropped) MaySv 1989 (54 FR 19526) ? 46xpjfq^«i««M#8)v r*? v ; " ;<;' . .; ; ";,- : ; ;' ; , ' JnIy;U|l!W9^5VF^2>82b) * f(. ::'^\ . \ .''' v? 52 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #9) August 16, 1989 (54 FR 33846) 2 (proposal of AT SDR sites) Number of Sites Final 703 703 802 7993 , 8903 890^; 889s 889 Proposed 185 2482 / 149 378 273 './r:?*-2$$ >-^"; '"' "335 '"; 337 Total 888 951 951 1,177 1,163 ,:;x"-.t 1,173 . ^ *.-.; - 1,224 1,226 23 ------- FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES (continued) Date October 4, 1989 (54 FR 41000/41015) 93 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-8; 31 proposed sites dropped) October 26, 1989 (54 FR 43778) 25, including 2 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #10, last proposed rule under original HRS) November 21, 1989 (54 FR 48184) 29 (promulgation of 27 Federal facility sites from Proposed Rule #9 and 2 ATSDR sites; expansion of 1 Fedt.al facility site) February 21, 1990 (55 FR 6154) 71 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-7, 9; 1 proposed site dropped) March 14, 1990 (55 FR 9688) 1 (promulgation of United Heckathorn Co., Richmond, California, part of Proposed Rule #10) August 30, 1990 (55 FR 35502) 106 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2, 5-10; 10 proposed sites dropped) February 11, 1991 (56 FR 5598) 6 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2, 5-7, 10; 14 proposed sites dropped) (last final rule under original HRS) May 9, 1991 (56 FR 21460) 1 (proposal of ATSDR site) July 29, 1991 (56 FR 35840) 22 (Proposed Rule #11, firsi proposed rule under revised HRS) September 25, 1991 (56 FR 48438) 1 (promulgation of ATSDR site) February 7, 1992 (57 FR 4824) 30 (Proposed Rule #12) October 14, 1992 (57 FR 47181) 33 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #1 1 and 12); first final rule under revised HRS October 14, 1992 (57 FR%7204) " :'^; '. * ".,- ' " "' '. ' .' '" i 9 (Proposed Rule;#l3) - - "' ; ' ; ='. . .. May 10, 1993 (58 FR 27507) 26 (Proposed Rule #14) P Final 9813 981 1,010 1,081 1,082 1.1873 1.1893 1.1883 1,188 1.1853 1.1833 - i,2083-4 ; t 1.2023-4 . dumber of Sit Proposed 213 ,238 209 137 136 20 0 1 23 22 52 ' ' .'.-'' ' '..-.-'v ..;28x-' ; : .- : -' -.--" . .-/-,-- ' - -. v. '_ - ' 54 es Total 1,194 1,219 1,219 1,218 1,218 1,207 1,189 1,189 1,211 1,207 1,235 : *'., 1,236 "'" * " '- * , 1,256 24 ------- FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES (continued) Date June 23, 1993 (58 FR 34018) 17 (Proposed Rule #15) January 18, 1994 (59 FR 2568) 26 (Proposed Rule #16) February 23, 1994 (59 FR 8724) 1 (promulgation of ALCOA (Point Comfort)/Lavaca Bay, Point Comfort, Texas) , May 31, 1994 (59 FR 27989) 42 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #11-16) August 23, 1994 (59 FR 43314) 10 (Proposed Rule #17) December 16, 1994 (59 FR 65206) 18 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #12-14, 16 and 17) February 13, 1995 (60 FR 8212) 9 (Proposed Rule #18) April 25, 1995 (60 FR 20330) 4 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #11, 15, and 16) May 26, 1995 (60 FR 27896) 1 (promulgation of site from Proposed Rule #18) September 1995 12 (Proposed Rule #19) September 1995 8 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #12, 14, 17, and 18) Number of Sites Final 1.1993-4 1.1923 1,191* 1,232s 1,232 1,242s 1,24 13 1,238s 1,237s 1 2383-4 Proposed 71 97 96 54 64 46 55 50 49 52 Total 1,270 1,289 1,287 1,286 1296 1,288 1,296 1,288 1,286 1,^90 'No Federal Register notice. 'Silver Creek Tailings, Park City, UT, removed October 17, 1986 as required by CERCLA Section 118(p). 'Reflects site(s) deleted since last rule. 4Reflects site(s) removed since last rule. 'Reflects sites(s) withdrawn since last rule. ' - 25 ------- |