United States
            Environmental Protection
            Agency
Office of           Publication 9320.7-051
Solid Waste and      September 1995
Emergency Response
    ^•^M.                         '
vxEPASupplementary Materials:
            National  Priorities  List,
            Proposed  Rule  and  Final  Rule
   Office of Emergency end Remedial Response
   Hazardous Site Evaluation Division (5204G)
            Intermittent Bulletin
            Volume 5, Number 2 (Proposed Rule)
            Volume 2, Number 3 (Final Rule)
   The National Priorities List (NPL) informs the
public of uncontrolled hazardous waste sites that
warrant further investigation to determine if they pose
risks to human health or the environment. Such sites
are eligible for long-term "remedial action" financed
under the Trust Fund established by the Comprehen-
sive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
      Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) as amended by the
      Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
      1986 (SARA).  In October 1990, CERCLA was
      extended to September 30, 1994.  An appropriation
      by Congress  for Fiscal Year  1995 authorized
      Superfund  to  continue  to operate.   The U.S.
      Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has the
      primary responsibility  for managing the Superfund
      program.
                              Table of Contents

  How Sites Are Placed on the NPL	2
  Statutory Requirements and Listing Policies	 3
  NPL Status (September 1995) . .	4
  How Sites Are Deleted From the NPL	 5
  Removing Proposed Sites		,	5
  Key Dates In Superfund	6
  Lists and Data Summaries	7
      Federal Facilities Section (by State)	.......		8
      Proposed Sites (by State)	 13
      Sites Deleted from the NPL .'.	 .	 . . .  . 16
  ^   NPL Sites Per State/Territory (by New Final Sites) ... .',-.. . . . . V. . .-.-;. -.-..'.  . 19
      NPL Sites Per EPA Region		 20
      Federal Register Notices	22

-------
HOW SITES ARE PLACED
ON THE NPL

    EPA uses informal rulemaking to place sites on
the NPL.  Sites are first proposed to the NPL hi the
Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments
on the sites (typically for 60 days), responds to the
comments, and finally places on the NPL those  sites
that continue to meet the requirements for listing.

    Section  300.425(c)  of the  National  Oil  and
Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency  Plan
(NCP), the Federal regulation by which CERCLA is
implemented (55 FR 8845, March 8, 1990), provides
three mechanisms for placing sites on the NPL.  The
primary mechanism is EPA's Hazard Ranking System
(HRS).   The  original  HRS, developed in 1982,
evaluated  the relative threat  a site posed to human
health  or the environment over five "pathways," or
routes of exposure.  The HRS score was based on the
evaluation  of  three   pathways  through  which
contaminants can migrate:   ground  water,  surface
water,  and air.  The other two pathways, direct
contact and  fire/explosion,  were  evaluated to
determine  the  need   for   immediate    removal
(emergency) action.  HRS scores ranged from  0 to
100.  An HRS score of 28.50 was selected as the
cutoff point for the first proposed NPL to identify at
least 400 sites, the minimum suggested by CERCLA.

    On December 14, 1990  (55 FR 51532), EPA
revised the HRS, as required by SARA.  The revised
HRS became effective on March 14, 1991.  It is a
more  comprehensive and accurate scoring  system
than the original HRS and may add new types of sites
to the NPL.

    The revised HRS retains the same cutoff score
and basic approach as  the  original HRS, while
incorporating   SARA  requirements   as   well  as
improvements identified as necessary by EPA and the
public.  The revised HRS retains the ground water,
surface water,  and air pathways,.drops the direct
contact and fire/explosion pathways,  and adds a
fourth pathway, soil exposure. All four can be used
to calculate the site score.

.'••••"  The second mechanism for placing sites on the
NPL allows States or Territories to designate one top-
priority site regardless of score. Of the 57 States and
Territories,- 40 have designated top-priority  sites.
Seven of these sites have been dele.-d from the NPL
because no further response was necessary.

    The third mechanism allows listing a site if it
meets all three of these requirements:

    •   The  Agency  for Toxic  Substances  and
        Disease  Registry (ATSDR) of the  U.S.
        Public Health Service has issued a health
        advisory that recommends removing people
        from the site.

    •   EPA determines the site poses a significant
        threat to public health.

    •   EPA anticipates it  will  be  more  cost-
        effective  to use  its  remedial  authority
        (available only at NPL sites) than to use its
        emergency removal authority to respond to
        the site.

    Twelve sites have been proposed  to the NPL on
the basis of ATSDR advisories:

    •   Seven are  on the NPL:  Forest Glen
        Mobile  Home  Subdivision,  Niagara
        Falls, NY, and Radium Chemical Co.,
        Inc., New  York City, NY (54  FR
      .  48184,  November 21,  1989);  White
        Chemical Corp., Newark  NJ  (56  FR
        48438,  September 25,  1991);  Austin
        Avenue   Radiation  Site,   Delaware
        County, PA (57 FR 47181, October 14,
        1992);  Lower  Ecorse  Creek  Dump,
        Wyandotte, MI (59 FR 27989, May 31,
        1994);   Raymark  Industries,   Inc.,
        Stratford, CT (59 FR 2568 January '. >i
        1995);   and   Tennessee   Products,
        Chattanooga, TN (September 1995).

    •   One, Lansdowne Radiation Site, Lansdowne,
        PA has been deleted because  all appropriate
        response has been completed (56 FR 46121,
        September 10, 1991).

    •   One, Quail  Run Mobile   Manor,  Gray
        Summit, MO (48 FR 40674, September 8,
        1983)   was   dropped   from .''further
        consideration on February 11, 1991 (56 FR
        5598). Because of an EPA removal action,
        ATSDR had rescinded its health advisory.

-------
     Three,   Aircraft   Components  (D&L  Sales),
     Benton Harbor, MI; H&K Sales,  Belding, MI;
     and  Little  Valley,  Little Valley,  NY, were
     proposed in this rule (September 1995).
 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
 AND LISTING POLICIES

     CERCLA restricts EPA's authority to respond to
 certain sites by expressly excluding some substances -
 - petroleum, for example —  from the definition of
 "release."  In addition, as a matter of policy, EPA
 may choose not to use CERCLA because the Federal
 government can undertake or enforce cleanup under
 other laws, thus preserving CERCLA funds for sites
 not covered by other laws. EPA has chosen not to
 use CERCLA for certain types of sites regulated by
 Subtitle  C  of   the  Resource  Conservation   and
 Recovery Act (RCRA) and the Nuclear Regulatory
 Commission  (NRC).    However,  if   EPA later
 determines that sites not listed as a matter  of policy
 are not being properly responded to, it may consider
 placing them on the NPL.

 RCRA-Related Sites

     When the first final  NPL was promulgated in
 September  1983, EPA  announced certain  listing
 policies relating  to sites that might qualify for  the
 NPL.  One of these policies involved facilities subject
 to RCRA Subtitle C. EPA's policy was generally not
 to place on the NPL, RCRA "regulated units" (for
 example, land disposal units that received hazardous
 waste  after the  effective  date of the RCRA land
 disposal regulations)  because EPA can require  the
 owner/operator to  c'^an  up  undei Rf!RA,   The
 RCRA cleanup process and standards are similar to
 those under CERCLA, ensuring that all actions taken
 will protect human health  and the environment.

     In November 1984, the  Hazardous and Solid
 Waste Amendments (HSWA) to RCRA were enacted,
 expanding EPA's  authority  to  require corrective
 measures under  Subtitle  C.   As  a result of this
 broadened RCRA authority, EPA revised its policy
 for placing non-Federal RCRA-regulated sites on the ,
rNPLYl-aj^^dn June: 1Q,= 1986  (54  FR iZlQS?)
 announced that facilities subject to RCRA Subtitle C
 corrective action  authorities would be placed  on  the
.NPL if one or more of these conditions  exists:
    •   The facilities  are  owned by  persons who
        have demonstrated an inability to finance
        appropriate corrective action by  invoking
        bankruptcy laws.

    •   The  facilities  have lost  authorization  to
        operate (also known as the Loss of Interim
        Status, or LOIS provision), and  there  are
        additional indications that the owner  or
        operator is unwilling to undertake corrective
        action.

    •   The facilities have not lost authorization to
        operate  but  have  a  clear  history   of
        unwillingness to undertake corrective action.
        These situations are determined on a case-
        by-case basis.

    On June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23978) and October 9,
1989  (54  FR  41000),  EPA announced additional
components of the NPL/RCRA policy.  As a matter
of policy, EPA will list four additional categories of
RCRA-related sites:

    •   Facilities that  were  treating,  storing,   or
        disposing of Subtitle C hazardous waste after
        November 19,  1980, but that did not file a
        "Part  A," the  initial  part of  the permit
        application, by  that date as  required and
        have little or no history of compliance with
        RCRA. EPA believes that these non- or late
       filers,  although they are technically subject
        to RCRA, are  not' likely to be  cleaned up
        expeditiously under RCRA and so should be
        on the  NPL.   However, if such  facilities
        have complied  with  RCRA,  EPA may
        consider whether listing is necessary.

    •   Facilities with permits  for the treatment,
        storage,  or disposal  of hazardous waste
        issued before  enactment of HSWA,  and
        whose owners/operators will not voluntarily
        modify the permit.  Pre-HSWA permittees
        are not required to take corrective action  for
        releases.   Under RCRA Section  3004(u),
        EPA does not have the authority to modify
        a pre-HSWA permit'ibr: corrective action
  .      untU me permit is reissued.   —'

-------
                    NPL Status (September  1995)
                        Number of Sites on Final NPL
                                         Total:   1,238
                General Superfund Section:   1,083
                  Federal Facilities Section:     1 55
               Number of Sites Remaining on Proposed NPL
                                         Total:   52
                General Superfund Section:   47
                  Federal Facilities Section:    5
                 Total Number of Final and Proposed Sites
                                      1,290
           Number of Sites on the Construction  Completion List
                                       304
                  Number of Sites  Deleted from Final NPL
                                       84
Facilities  that  filed a  Part A  permit
application  for  treatment,   storage,  or
disposal of Subtitle C hazardous waste as a
precautionary measure only. Such facilities
- for example, generators, transporters, or
recyclers of hazardous  waste ~  are not
subject  to  Subtitle  C  corrective  action
authorities.   These are  referred  to as
protective filers.

Facilities that at one  time treated or stored
Subtitle  C hazardous waste but have since
converted  to generator-only  status  (i.e.,
facilities that now store hazardous waste for
90 days or  less) or any of'er hazardous
waste activity not requiring Interim Status.
These facilities,  whose  Part A permit
applications have been withdrawn with EPA
or State  approval,  are   referred  to  as
converters.    EPA  believes  it  has  the
authority under RCRA  Section 3008(u) to
compel corrective action at such facilities.
However,   RCRA's   corrective   action
program  currently  focuses primarily  on
treatment,  storage, and  disposal  facilities
(due  to  permitting deadlines  in  RCRA).
Therefore,' this category should be.on the
NPL  to  ensure  expeditious  cleanup.
However,  if a consent  order requiring
remedial action is in effect, a converter need
not be listed.
Federal  Facility Sites

    CERCLA Section 120(a) requires that Federal
facilities be subject to and comply with CERCLA in
the same  manner as any  nongovernmental entity.
CERCLA  Section  lll(e)(3), however,  generally
prohibits use of the Trust Fund for remedial actions
at Federally owned facilities. Thus, Federal agencies
must use their own funds for cleanup.  Federal sites
are listed in a separate section of Appendix B, rather
than in the General Superfund Section.

    Because most  Federal  facilities  have RCRA-
regulated   units within  their  boundaries,  EPA
Determined that a separate NPL/RCRA policy should
be adopted for Federal facilities.  AD a result, on
March  13, 1989 (54 FR 10520), EPA announced it
would  place on the NPL  those sites located on
Federally owned or operated facilities that reel the
NPL eligibility requirements — e.g., HRS scores of
28.50 or greater - even if the Federal facility also is
subject to the corrective action authorities of RCRA
Subtitle C.  Cleanup,  if appropriate,  could  then
proceed at those sites  under either CERCLA or
RCRA.     The  policy  is  based  on  several
considerations:   ',,,'./•   •   :.'"",
       Congress  clearly  intended  that  Federal
       facility sites should be on the NPL.

       Strict  application  of  the  non-Federal
       NPL/RCRA policy would exclude virtually

-------
        all Federal facility  sites from the NPL
        because they would not likely meet any of
        the criteria necessary for listing (inability to
        pay  as  evidenced   by  invocation   of
        bankruptcy   laws    or   demonstrated
        unwillingness to comply with RCRA).

    •   Placing RCRA-regulated Federal sites on the
        NPL serves the  primary  purpose of listing
        Federal facility sites to advise the public of
        the status of Federal government  cleanup
        efforts.

    •   Listing these sites helps Federal agencies set
        priorities and focus cleanup efforts on those
        sites that present the most serious problem.

 Radioactive Release Sites

    CERCLA Section 101(22) excludes several types
 of releases of radioactive  materials from the statutory
 definition of "release." These releases are therefore
 not eligible for CERCLA response  actions or the
 NPL.  The exclusions apply to (1) releases of source,
 by-product, or special nuclear material from a nuclear
 incident if  these releases  are' subject to  financial
 protection  requirements  under  Section 170 of the
 Atomic Energy Act and  (2) any releases of source,
 by-product, or special nuclear material  from  any
 processing site designated under the Uranium Mill
 Tailings    Radiation   Control   Act  of   1978.
 Accordingly, such radioactive releases have not been
 considered eligible for the NPL.

    As a policy matter, EPA has also chosen not to
 list releases of source, by-product, or special nuclear
 material from  any  facility with  a  current license
 issued  by  the  Nuclear   Regulatory  Commission
 (NRC), on the grounds that NRC has full authority to
 require cleanup of releases from such facilities. EPA
 will, however, list releases from facilities that hold a
 current license issued  by  a State pursuant to an
 agreement  between the State and die NRC under
 Section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act.  Facilities
 whose  licenses are  no  longer in effect are  also
 considered for listing.

 HOW SITES ARE DELETED
               NPU:   i    ,<.    ;.-*•<..
    EPA may delete a final NPL site if it determines
that no further response is required to protect human
health or the environment. Under Section 300.425(e)
of the NCP (55 FR 8845, March 8, 1990,) a site may
be deleted where no further response is apprcpriate if
EPA determines that one of the following criteria has
been met:

     •   EPA,  in  conjunction with the State, has
        determined that responsible or other parties
        have implemented all appropriate response
        action  required.

     •   EPA,  in  consultation with the State, has
        determined that all  appropriate  Superfund-
        financed response under CERCLA has been
        implemented, and that no further response
        by responsible parties is appropriate.

     •   A remedial investigation has shown that the
        release poses no significant threat to public
        health  or  the environment, and, therefore
        remedial measures are not appropriate.

     Since 1986, EPA has followed these procedures
for deleting a site from' the NPL:

     •   The  Regional  Administrator  approves  a
        "close-out report" which establishes that all
        appropriate response action has  been taken
        or that no action is required.

     •   The    Regional   Office  obtains   State
        concurrence.

     •   EPA publishes a notice of intent to delete in
        the  Federal  Register  and   hi  a  major
        newspaper near the community involved. A
        public  comment period is provided.

    •   EPA responds to  the comments  and, if the
        site continues to warrant deletion, publishes
        a deletion  notice in the Federal Register.

    Sites  that  have been deleted from  the NPL
remain  eligible  for  further  Superfund-financed
remedial action in the unlikely event that conditions
in the future warrant such action.

REMOVING PROPOSED SITES

    As  of September  1995;  78, sites have been
proposed fprthe NPL but subse^uenUy removed from
further consideration, most  of; them because their
final HRS scores were below the 28.50 cutoff or they
are  subject to RCRA Subtitle C.  Three of the sites '
were reproposed on February 7, 1992 (57 FR 4824)
after being rescored with the revised HRS.

-------
                  Key Dates in  Superfund


Legislation

    Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
    (CERCLA)  enacted  December  11,  1980;   Trust  Fund of $1.6 billion
    authorized over 5 years

    CERCLA amended by Superfund  Amendments and Reauthorization Act
    (SARA) enacted October 17, 1986;  Trust Fund of $8.5 billion authorized
    over 5 years

 •   CERCLA extended to September 30,  1994;  an additional $5.1 billion
    authorized
Federal regulation implementing Superfund:  National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP)

 •   Revised July  16,  1982  (47  FR  31180)  to  incorporate  CERCLA
    requirements

 •   Revised March 8, 1990  (55 FR  8666)  in response to CERCLA  Section
    105, amended by SARA


Hazard Ranking System

 •   Promulgated July 16, 1982 (47 FR 31180) as Appendix A of the NCP

 •   Revised December  14,  1990  (55  FR 51532) in  response to CERCLA
    Section 105(c), added by  SARA; effective date March 14, 1991


National Prioi.ties List

 •   Promulgated September  8, 1983  (48 FR 40658)  as  Appendix B of the
    NCP

    Must be updated at least annually

 •   Last sites proposed  under original MRS promulgated February 11, 1991
    (56 FR 5598);  Construction Completion category activated (56 FR 5634)

 •   First sites proposed under revised MRS July 29,1991 (56 FR 35840)

 •   First sites added to  N PL under revised HRS October 14, 1992  (57  FR
    47181)
  »

 •   Construction Completion List activated March 2, 1993 (58 FR 12142)

-------
LISTS AND DATA SUMMARIES

-------

-------
                                            National  Priorities List
                         Federal Facilities Section,  Final  and Proposed Sites  (by  State)
                                                 September  1995
 St  Site Name
                                                                City/County
                            Date

                      Proposed  Final
 AK  Adak Naval Air Station
 AK  Eielson Air Force Base
 AK  Elmendorf Air Force Base
 AK  Fort Richardson (USARMY)
 AK  Fort Wainwright   ,    ,
 AK  Standard Steel&Metals Salvage YardCUSDOT

          6 Final + 0 Proposed = 6

 AL  Alabama Army Ammunition Plant
 AL  Anniston Army Depot (SE Industrial Area)
 AL  Redstone Arsenal (USARMY/NASA)

          3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3

 AZ  Luke Air Force Base
 AZ  Williams Air Force Base
 AZ  Yuma Marine Corps Air Station

          3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3

 CA  Barstou Marine Corps Logistics Base
 CA  Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base
 CA  Castle Air Force Base
 CA  Concord Naval  Weapons Station
 CA  Edwards Air Force Base
 CA  El Toro Marine Corps Air Station
 CA  Fort Ord                             .
 CA  George Air Force Base
 CA  Jet Propulsion Laboratory (NASA)
 CA  LEHR/Old Campus Landfill (USDOE)
 CA  Lawrence Liver-more Lab Site 300 (USDOE)
 CA  Lawrence Livermore Laboratory (USDOE)
 CA  March Air Force Base
 CA  Mather Air Force Base
 CA  McClellan Air  Force  Base (GW Contam)
 CA  Moffett Naval  Air Station
 CA  Norton Air Force Base
 CA  Riverbank Army.Ammunition Plant
 CA  Sacramento Army Depot
 CA  Sharpe Army Depot
 CA  Tracy Defense  Depot  (USARMY)
 CA  Travis Air Force Base
 CA  Treasure Island Naval  Station-Hun  Pt  An

          23 Final  + 0 Proposed =  23

 CO  Air Force Plant PJKS
 CO  Rocky Flats Plant (USDCE)
 CO  Rocky Mountain Arsenal  (USARMY)

          3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3

 CT .  New London Submarine Base

          1 >iriat * 0 Proposed = 1

. DE  Dover Air Force Base "

          1  Final + 0 Proposed = 1
 Adak               .     10/92   05/94
 Fairbanks  N  Star  Boro    07/89   11/89
 Greater  Anchorage Bor    07/89   08/90
 Anchorage                06/93   05/94
 Fairbanks  N  Star  Boro    07/89   08/90
 Anchorage                07/89   08/90
 Childersburg            10/84   07/87
 Anniston                10/84   03/89
 Huntsville              06/93   05/94
 Glendale                07/89   08/90
 Chandler                07/89   11/89
 Yuma                    06/88   02/90
Barstow
San Diego County •
Merced
Concord
Kern County
El Tore
Marina
Victorville
Pasadena
Davis
Livermore
Livermore
Riverside
Sacramento
Sacramento
Sunnyvale
San Bernardino
Riverbank
Sacransento
Lathrop
Tracy
Solano County
San Francisco
07/89
07/89
10/84
02/92
07/89
06/88
07/89
07/89
02/92
01/94
07/89
10/84
07/89
10/84
10/84
04/85
10/84
06/88
10/84
10/84
07/89
07/89
07/89
11/89
11/89
07/87
12/94
08/90
02/90
02/90
02/90
10/92
05/94
08/90
07/87
11/89
07/87
07/87
07/87
07/87
02/90
07/87
07/87
08/90
11/89
11/89
Waterloo
Golden
Adams County
New London
Dover
07/89
10/84
10/84
11/89
10/89
07/87
                        10/89   08/90
                        10/84"   03/89

-------
                                  National Priorities List
                Federal  Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
                                       September 1995
Date
St Site Name
FL Cecil Field Naval Air Station
FL Homestead Air Force Base
FL Jacksonville Naval Air Station
FL Pensacola Naval Air Station
FL Whiting Field Naval Air Station
5 Final + 0 Proposed = 5
GA Marine Corps Logistics Base
GA Robins Air Force Base(Lf#4/Sludge lagoon
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
GU Andersen Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
HI Naval Computer & Telecommunications Area
HI Pearl Harbor Naval Complex
HI Schofield Barracks (USARMY)
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
IA Iowa Army Ammunition Plant
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
ID Idaho National Engineering Lab (USDOE)
ID Mountain Home Air Force Base
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
IL Joliet Army Ammunition Plant (LAP Area)
IL Joliet Army Ammunition Plant (Mfg Area)
IL Sangamo Electric/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI
IL Savanna Army Depot Activity
4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4
KS Fort Riley
KS Sunflower Army Ammunition Plant
1 Final + 1 Proposed = 2
KY Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (USDOE)
. 1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
LA Louisiana Army Ammunition Plant
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
MA Fort Devens :
MA Fort Devens-Sudbury Training Annex
MA Jianscom Field/Hanscom Air Force Base
MA Materials Technology Laboratory (USARMY)
MA Natick Laboratory Army Research.D&E Cntr
MA Naval Weapons Industrial Reserve Plant
MA Otis Air National Guard (USAF)
MA South Ueymouth Naval Air Station
City/County
Jacksonville
Homestead
Jacksonville
Pensacola
Milton

Albany
Houston County

Yigo

Oahu
Pearl Harbor
Oahu

Middletown

Idaho Falls
Mountain Home

Joliet
Joliet
Carterville
Savanna

Junction City
DeSoto

Paducah

Doyline

Fort Devens
Middlesex County
Bedford
Watertbwn .
-r • • . '-.' Natick .-- r - ' f :
Bedford
• Falroouth -•
Ueymouth
Proposed
07/89
07/89
07/89
07/89
01/94

07/89
10/84

02/92

01/94
07/91
07/89

07/89

07/89
07/89

04/85
10/84
10/84
10/84
-
07/89
02/95

05/93

10/84

07/89
07/89
05/93
06/93
05/93
06/93
07/89
06/93
Final
11/89
08/90
11/89
11/89
05/94

11/89
07/87

10/92

05/94
10/92
08/90

08/90

11/89
' 08/90

03/89
07/87
07/87
03/89

08/90 .

05/94

03/89

11/89
02/90
05/94
05/94
05/94
05/94
11/89
05/94
8 Final + 0 Proposed = 8

-------
                   National  Priorities  List
Federal Facilities Section,  Final  and Proposed Sites  (by State)
                        September  1995

St Site Name
MD Aberdeen Proving Ground (Edgewood Area)
MD Aberdeen Proving Ground(Michaelsville LF
MD Beltsville Agricultural Research (USDA)
MD. Indian Head Naval Surface Warfare Center
MD Patuxent River Naval Air Station
5 Final + 0 Proposed = 5
ME Brunswick Naval Air Station
ME Loring Air Force Base
ME Portsmouth Naval Shipyard
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
MI -Wurtsmith Air Force Base
0 Final + 1 Proposed = 1
MN Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant
MN New Brighton/Arden Hills/TCAAP (USARMY)
MN Twin Cities Air Force Base(SAR Landfill)
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
MO Lake City Army Ammu. Plant (NW Lagoon)
MO Weldon Spring Former Army Ordnance Works
MO Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pi tts(USDOE)
3 Final + 0 Proposed =3
NC Camp Lejeune Military Res. (USNAVY)
NC Cherry Point Marine Corps Air Station
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
NE Cornhusker Army Ammunition Plant
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
NH Pease Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
NJ Federal Aviation Admin. Tech. Center
NJ Fort bix (Landfill Site)
NJ Naval Air Engineering Center
NJ Naval Weapons Station Earle (Site A)
NJ Pica tinny Arsenal (USARMY)
NJ W.R. Grace/Wayne Interim Storage (USDOE)
6 Final + 0 Proposed = 6
NM Cal West Metals (USSBA)
NM Lee Acres Landfill (USDOI)
r /,- 2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2 - _
NY Brookhaven National Laboratory (USDOE)
NY Griff iss Air Force Base
NY Plattsburgh Air Force Base

City/County
Edgewood
Aberdeen
Beltsville
Indian Head
St. Mary's County

Brunswick
Limestone
Kittery

losco County

Fridley
New Brighton '
Minneapolis

Independence
St. Charles County
St. Charles County

Ons low County
Havelock

Hall County

Portsmouth/Newington

Atlantic County
Pemberton Township
Lakehurst
Colts Neck
Rockaway Township
Wayne Township

Lemitar
- Fermi ngt on
/ • • . " • - • % . .
Upton :."
• . -.Rome' ' ' '
Plattsburgh
Dati
Proposed
04/85
04/85
05/93
02/95
01/94

10/84
07/89
. 06/93

01/94

07/89
12/82
01/87

10/84
07/89
10/84

06/88
08/94

10/84

07/89

07/89
10/84
09/85
10/84
07/89
09/83

06/88
06/88
07/89
10/84
07/89
s
Final
02/90
10/89
05/94
09/95
05/94

07/87
02/90
05/94



11/89
09/83
07/87

07/87
02/90
07/87

10/89
12/94

07/87

02/90

08/90
07/87
07/87
08/90
02/90
09/84

03/89
08/90
11/89
07787
11/89
                            10

-------
                                           National Priorities List
                        Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
                                                September 1995
 St  Site Name
Ci ty/County
      Date

Proposed  Final
NY  Seneca Army Depot

         4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4

OH  Air Force Plant 85
OH  Feed Materials Production Center (USDOE)
OH  Hound Plant (USDOE)
OH  Rickenbacker Air National Guard (USAF)
OH  Wright-Patterson Air Force Base

         3 Final + 2 Proposed = 5

OK  Tinker Air Force(Soldier Cr/Bldg 300)

         1 Final + 0 Proposed =1

OR  Fremont Nat. Forest Uranium Mines (USDA)
OR  Umatilla Army Depot (Lagoons)

         2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2

PA  Letterkenny Army Depot (PDO Area)
PA  Letterkenny Army Depot (SE Area)
PA  Naval Air Development Center(8 Areas)
PA  Navy Ships Parts Control Center
PA  Tobyhanna Army Depot
PA  Willow Grove Naval Air & Air Res. Stn.

         6 Final + 0 Proposed = 6

PR  Naval Security Group Activity

         1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1

RI  Davisville Naval Construction Batt Cent
RI  Newport Naval Education/Training Center

         2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2

SC  Parris Island Marine Corps Recruit Depot
SC  Savannah River Site (USDOE)

         2 Final + 0 Proposed - 2

SO  Ellsworth Air Force Base

         1 Final + 0 Proposed =1,

TN  Arnold Engineering Develop. Ctr. (USAF)
TN  Memphis Defense Depot (OLA)
TN  Milan Array Ammunition Plant
TN  Oak Ridge Reservation (USDOE)

         3 Final>1 Proposed = 4

TX  Air -Force Plant #4 (General Dynamics)
TX1  Lone. Star AnnyAmraunition Plant    '  ',
fX ' Longhorn Army Ammunition Plant    ..'•-"
TX .Pantex Plant (USDOE)    .;'  ':'-'   .,'

         4 Final * 0 Proposed - 4
Romulus
  07/89   08/90
Columbus
Fernald
Miamisburg
Lockbourne
Dayton
01/94
07/89
07/89
01/94
06/88

11/89
11/89

10/89
Oklahoma City
Lakeview
Hermiston
Franklin County
Chambersbiirg
Warminster Township
Mechanicsburg
Tobyhanna
Willow Grove
Sabana Seca
North Kingston
Newport
Parris island
Aiken
Rapid Jity
Tullahoma/Manchester
Memphis
Milan
Oak Ridge
Fort Worth  .....
Texarkarta   v. •
Karnack'
Pantex Village
  04/85   07/87
  06/93   04/95
  10/84   07/87
  04/85   03/89
  10/84   07/87
  06/86   10/89
  01/94   05/94
  07/89   08/90
  08/94   09/95
  06/88   10/89
  07/89   11/89
  07/89   11/89
  08/94   12/94
  07/89   11/89
  10/89   08/90
  08/94
  02/92   10/92
  10/84   07/87
  07/89 . 11/89
          08/90
  07/8> ;  08/90
  07/91-105/94
                                                     11

-------
                                           National  Priorities List
                        Federal  Facilities Section,  Final  and Proposed Sites (by State)
                                                September  1995

st
UT
UT
UT
UT

VA
VA
VA
VA
VA
VA

Site Name
Hill Air Force Base
Monti cello Mill Tailings (USDOE)
Ogden Defense Depot (DLA)
Tooele Army Depot (North Area)
4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4
Defense General Supply Center (DLA)
Fort Eustis (US Army)
Langley Air Force Base/NASA Langley Cntr
Marine Corps Combat Development Command
Naval Surface Warfare - Dahlgren
Naval .Weapons Station - Yorktown

City/County
Ogden
Monti cello
Ogden
Tooele

Chesterfield County
Newport News
Hampton
Quant i co
Dahlgren
Yorktown
Dat
Proposed
10/84
07/89
10/84
10/84

10/84
01/94
05/93
05/93
02/92
02/92
e
Final
07/87
11/89
07/87
08/90

07/87
12/94
05/94
05/94
10/92
10/92
       .  6 Final + 0 Proposed = 6

WA  American Lake Gardens/McChord AFB
WA  Bangor Naval Submarine Base
WA  Bangor Ordnance Disposal (USNAVY)
WA  Bonneville Power Admin Ross (USDOE)
WA  Fairchild Air Force Base (4 Waste Areas)
WA  Fort Lewis Logistics Center
WA  Hanford 100-Area (USDOE)
WA  Hanford 1100-Area (USDOE)
WA  Hanford 200-Area (USDOE)
WA  Hanford 300-Area (USDOE)
WA  Jackson Park Housing Complex (USNAVY)
WA  McChord Air Force Base (Wash Rack/Treat)
WA  Naval Air Station, Whidbey Is (Seaplane)
WA  Naval Air Station, Whidbey Island (Ault)
WA  Naval Undersea Warfare Station (4 Areas)
WA  Old Navy Dump/Manchester Lab(USEPA/NOAA)
WA  Port Hadlock Detachment (USNAVY)
WA  Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Complex

         18 Final + 0 Proposed = 18

WV  Allegany Ballistics Laboratory (USNAVY)
WV  West Virginia Ordnance (USARMY)

         2 Final + 0 Proposed - 2

WY  F.E. Warren Air Force Base

         1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1

       155 Final + 5 Proposed = 160
Tacoma
Silverdale
Bremerton
Vancouver
Spokane County
Tillicum
Benton County
Benton County
Benton County
Benton County
Kitsap County
Tacoma
Whidbey Island
Whidbey Island
Keyport
Manchester
Indian Island
Bremerton
Mineral
Point Pleasant
Cheyenne
09/83
07/89
10/84
07/89
06/88
07/89 .
06/88
06/88
06/88
06/88
06/93
10/84
09/85
09/85
06/86
01/94
06/93
05/93
06/93
12/82
09/84
08/90
07/87
11/89
03/89
11/89
10/89
10/89
10/89
10/89
05/94
07/87
02/90
02/90
10/89
05/94
05/94
05/94
05/94
09/83
07/89   02/90
                                                     12

-------
                                          National  Priorities  List
                                          Proposed  Sites,  by State
                                               September  1995
St
              Site Name
                                                                        Location
                                                                                             Notes
                                                                                                  a
AL
CA
CO
GA
ID
IL
IN
LA
General Superfund Sites
    Monarch Tile Manufacturing, Inc.
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1

General Superfund Sites
    Cooper Drum Co.
    Del Amo Facility
    GBF, Inc., Dump
    Stoker Company
4 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 4

General Superfund Sites
    ASARCO, .,ic. (Globe Plant)
    Smeltertown Site
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2

General Superfund Sites
    Breward County--21st Manor Dump
    Normandy Park Apartments
    Stauffer Chemical Co. (Tampa Plant)
3 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 3

General Superfund Sites
    LCP Chemicals Georgia
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1

General Superfund Sites
    Waterloo Coal Gasification Plant
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1

General Superfund Sites
    Blackbird Mine
    Triumph Mine Tailings Piles
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2

General Superfund Sites
    Jennison Wright Corporation
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
General Superfund Sites
    U.S. Smelter & Lead Refinery Inc.
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility
                                                     Sites = 1
General Superfund Sites
    Wright Ground Water Contamination
Federal Facility Sites
    Sunflower Army Ammunition Plant
1 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 2

General Superfund Sites
    Gulf State Utilities-North Ryan Street
    Lincoln Creosote
    Old Citgo Refinery (Bossier City)
3 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 3

General Superfund Sites
    Ordnance Products,' Inc.   -              •   "•'    •
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites - 1

General Superfund Sites
    Eastern Surplus Co.
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
                                                                        Florence
                                                                        South Gate
                                                                        Los Angeles
                                                                        Antioch
                                                                        Imperial
                                                                        Denver
                                                                        Salida
                                                                        Fort  Lauderdale
                                                                        Temple Terrace
                                                                        Tampa
                                                                        Brunswick
                                                                        Waterloo
                                                                        Lemhi  County
                                                                        Triumph
Granite City



East Chicago



Wright

DeSoto
                                                                        Lake Charles
                                                                        Bossier City
                                                                        Bossier
                                                                        Cecil County*



                                                                        Meddybemps
                                                    13

-------
                                           National Priorities List
                                           Proposed Sites, by State
                                                September 1995
  St
               Site Name
                                                                         Location
                                                                                               Notes
                                                                                                    a
 MI    General Superfund Sites
           Aircraft. Components  Inc.  (D & L Sales)
           Bay City Middlegrounds
           H & K Sales
       Federal Facility Sites
           Wurtsmith Air Force  Base
       3 General Superfund Sites + 1  Federal  Facility Sites = 4

 MS    General Superfund Sites
           Chemfax, Inc.
           Potter Co.
       2 General Superfund Sites + 0  Federal  Facility Sites = 2

 MT    General Superfund Sites
           Burlington Northern  Livingston Complex
       1 General Superfund Sites + 0  Federal  Facility Sites = 1

 HE    General Superfund Sites
           Bruno Co-op Association/Associated Prop
       1 General Superfund Sites + 0  Federal  Facility Sites = 1

 HJ    General Superfund Sites
           Franklin Burn
           Uelsbach & General Gas Mantle (Camden)
       2 General Superfund Sites + 0  Federal Facility Sites = 2

 NX    General Superfund Sites
           Rinchem Co., Inc.
       1 General Superfund Sites + 0  Federal Facility Sites = 1

 NY    General Superfund.Sites
           Little Valley
       1 General Superfund Sites + 0  Federal Facility Sites = 1

' OH    General Superfund Sites
           Diamond Shamrock CorpCPainesvilie Works)
           Dover Chemical  Corp.
       Federal Facility Sites
           Air Force Plant 85
           Rickenbacker Air National  Guard (USAF)
       2 General Superfund Sites + 2 Federal Facility Sites = 4

 ox    General Superfund Sites
           National  Zinc Corp.
       1  General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1

 OK    GeneraI'Superfund Sites
           East Multnomah  County Ground Wtr Contain.
       1  General  Superfund Sites + 0  Federal Facility Sites - 1

 PA '  General Superfund Sites
           Breslube-Penn,  Incorporated
           East Tenth  Street
       2 General  Superfund Sites + 0  Federal  Facility Sites = 2

 so    General Superfund.Sites                      ..
           Annie Creek Mine Tailings              :
       1  General  Superfund Sites * 0  Federal  Facility Sites = 1

 TH    Federal Facility Sites '
           Arnold Engineering Develop. Ctr.  (USAF)             '
       0 General  Superfund Sites + 1  Federal  Facility Sites = 1
 Benton Harbor
 Bay City
 Belding

 losco County
 Gulfport
 Wesson
 Livingston
Bruno
Franklin Township
Camden arid Gloucester
Albuquerque



Little Valley
Painesville
Dover

Columbus
Lockbourne
Bartlesvilie
Multnomah County
Coraopolis
Marcus Hook
LeadV /
Tul lahoma/Harichester
                                                     14

-------
                                           National Priorities List
                                           Proposed Sites,  by State
                                                September 1995
 St
               Site Name
Location
                      Notes
                                                                                                    a
 ur    General Superfund Sites                •
           Kennecott (North Zone)                                        Magna
           Kennecott (South Zone)                                        Copperton
           Murray Smelter                                       ,         Murray City
           Richardson Flat Tailings                        -              Summit County
       4 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 4

 vi    General Superfund Sites
           Island Chemical Corp/V.I. Chemical Corp                       St.  Croix
       1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites =1

 wi    General Superfund Sites
           Penta Wood Products                                           Siren
       1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1

 wv    General Superfund Sites
           Hani in-All ied-Oli,,                                            Mounds vi lie
       1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites =1

       47 General Superfund Sites + 5 Federal Facility Sites = 52


aA = Based on issuance of health advisory by Agency for Toxic Substances and  Disease Registry
    (if scored, MRS score need not be > 28.50).
 S = State top priority (included among the 100  top priority sites regardless of  score).
                                                    15

-------

-------
Sites Deleted from the NPL
      September 1995
st
AL
AR
AS
AZ
CA
CM
CO
CT
DE
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
IA
IA
IA
ID
IL
IN
IN
IN
KS
KS
KS
MA
MI
Site Name
Mowbray Engineering Co.
Cecil Lindsey
Taputinou Farm
Mountain View Mobile Home Estates
Jibboom Junkyard
PCB Warehouse
Woodbury Chemical Co.
Revere Textile Prints Corp.
New Castle Steel
Alpha Chemical Corp.
Parramore Surplus
Pioneer Sand Co.
Tri-CityOil Conservationist, Inc
varsol Spill
Wilson Concepts of Florida, Inc.
Luminous Processes, Inc.
Aidex Corp.
LaBounty Site
Northwestern States Portland Cement Co.
Arrcom (Drexler Enterprises)
Petersen Sand & Gravel
International Minerals (E. Plant)
Poer Farm
Wedzeb Enterprises, Inc.
Big River .Sand Co.
Hydro-Flex Inc.
Johns' Sludge Pond .
Plymouth^Harbpr/Cannpn Engineering Corp. ;••...•
Chemical /Metals Industrie*. inc.J; ': ".
Middletown Road pim>
Cemetery Dump :
Location
Greenville
Newport
Island of Tutila
Globe
Sacramento
Saipan
Commerce City
Sterling
New Castle County
Galloway
Mount Pleasant
Warrington
Tampa
Miami
Pompano Beach
Athens
Council Bluffs
Charles City
Mason City
Rathdrum
Litertyville
Terre Haute
Hancock County
Lebanon
Wichita
Topeka
Wichita
. Plymouth
Baltimore , ? '', ;
• "•;,.>•> . ' :*•"•- . • • "" - - •••'
/•-•Annapolis
Rose Center
Date
Deleted
12/30/93
09/22/89
03/07/86
04/18/88
09/10/91
03/07/86
03/22/93
09/02/94
03/17/89
06/28/95
02/21/89
02/08/93
09/01/88
09/01/88
04/04/95
12/30/82
10/21/93
10/06/93
08/31/95
12/23/92
02/11/91
02/11/91
02/11/91
09/10/91
10/14/92
11/09/93
01/06/92
- J1/1V/93
.-" ', '- - f ' *C ~.' • : ."•-" V" ~^' ''- -•'
" ; ^04/18/88
04/19/95
          16

-------
Sites Deleted from the NPL
      September 1995
st
MI
MI
MI
MI
MI
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MO
MS
NC
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NM
NY
.NY,
NY
NY
NY
NY
NY
Site Name
Charlevoix Municipal Well
Gratiot County Golf Course
•Kent City Mobile Home Park
Metal Working Shop
Whitehall Municipal Wells
Adrian Municipal Well Field
Boise Cascade/Onan Corp. /Medtronics, Inc.
Dakhue Sanitary Landfill
Koch Refining Co./N-Ren Corp.
Morris Arsenic Dump
Olmsted County Sanitary Landfill
Union Scrap Iron & Metal Co.
North-U Drive Well Contamination
Ualcotte Chemical Co. Warehouses
PCB Spills
Beach wood/Berk ley Wells '.
Cooper Road
Friedman Property
Jackson Township Landfill
Krysowaty Farm
M&T Delisa Landfill
Monroe Township Landfill
Ringuood Nines/Landfill
Pagano Salvage
BEC Trucking
BioClinical Laboratories, Inc.
C & J Disposal Leasing Co. Dump
Kenmark Textile' Corp. .
Radium Chemical Co., inc. • •<••;,
Suffern Village Well Field .
Wide Beach Development
Location
Charlevoix
. St. Louis
Kent City
Lake Ann
Whitehall
Adrian ,
Fridley
Cannon 'Falls
Pine Bend
Morris
Oronoco
Minneapolis
Springfield
Greenville
243 Miles of Roads
Berkley Township
Voorhees Township
Upper Freehold Twp
Jackson Township
Hillsborough
Asbury Park
•.Monroe Township
Ringuood Borough
Los Lunas
Town of Vestal
Bohemia
Hamilton
Farmingdale
New York City ; - _'
• Village of Suffern
Brant
Date
Deleted
12/02/93
09/08/83
03/20/95
12/23/92
02/11/91
12/30/92
02/15/95
07/24/95
06/15/95
03/07/86
02/15/95
09/10/91
09/08/94
12/30/82
03/07/86
01/06/92
02/22/89
03/07/86
09/13/95
02/22/89
03/21/91
05/01/94
11/02/94
10,14/92
10/14/92
10/11/94
09/20/94
, 05/01/°5
: 03/24/95
; \ 05/28/93
08/30/94
           17

-------
                                         Sites Deleted from the NPL
                                               September 1995
st
OH
OR
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
SC
TT
TX
TX
VA
VA
UA
WA
UA
UA
UA
UI
Site Name
Chemical & Minerals Reclamation
Allied Plating, Inc.
Enterprise Avenue
Lansdowne Radiation Site
Lehigh Electric & Engineering Co;
Presque Isle
Reeser's Landfill
Voortman Farm
Uade (ABM)
West line Site
Independent Nail Co.
PCB Uastes
Crystal City Airport
Harris (Farley Street)
Matthews Electroplating
Suffolk City Landfill
Fort Lewis (Landfill No. 5)
Hamilton Island Landf ill(USA/COE)
Pesticide Lab (Yakima)
Toftdahl Drums
Yakima Plating Co.
Waste Research & Reclamation Co.
Location
Cleveland
Portland
Phi lade I phi a
• Lansdowne
Old Forge Borough
Erie
Upper Macungie Twp
Upper Saucon Twp
Chester
West line
Beaufort
Pacific Trust Terr
Crystal City
Houston
Roanoke County
Suffolk
Tacoma
North Bonneville
Yakima
Brush Prairie
Yakima
Eau Claire
Date
Deleted
12/30/82
11/14/94
03/07/86
09/10/91
03/07/86
.02/13/89
05/31/90
05/31/89
03/23/89
10/14/92
04/03/95
03/07/86
03/23/95
04/18/88
01/19/89
01/24/95
05/22/95
05/25/95
09/01/93
12/23/88
08/23/94
02/05/93
Number of sites deleted:   84
                                                    18

-------
                              National Priorities List
                     Final and Proposed Sites Per State/Territory
                                 (by New Final Sites)
                                   September 1995
State/Territory
Kansas
Maine
New Jersey
Tennessee
Texas
Virgin Islands
Maryland
Pennsylvania
Alabama
Alaska
American Samoa
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Commonwealth of Marianas
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Guam .
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Trust Territories
Utah
Vermont ,
Virginia
Washington .
West Virginia , •
Wisconsin ':"•"'.
Wyoming .'.-'.'
New
Gen






0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
v 0
0
0
0
o •
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
. o
0
0
0
F i na I
Fed
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 '
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 „
0
Total
Gen
10
8
100
14
25
1
8
95
9
2
0
7
12
69
13
0
14
18
0
48
11
1
1
6
33
32
16
19
13
22
74
.34
2
19
8
8
1,
16
8
76
21
2
31
9
9
8
10
23
2
0
8
8
18
35 .
4
\ 40
2
Final.
Fed
1
3
6
3
4
0
5
6
3
6
0
3
0
23
3
0
1
1
0
• 5
2
1
3
2
4
0
1
1
1
8
0
3
0
3
0
1
' 0
1
2
4
2
0
3
1
2
1
2
2
1
0
4
0
6
18
2
o ,
1
Total Proposed
Gen
1 '
1 .
2 ,
. 0
0
1
1
2
1
0
0
0
• 0
4
2
0
0
0
0
3
1
0
0
2
1
1
1
0
3
0
3
0
2
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
4
. 0
0
0
1
1
0
Fed
1 .
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o: :
0
0
Tota
13
12
108
18
29
2
14 .
103
13
8
0
10
12
96
18
0
15
19
0
56
14
2
4
10
38
33
18
20
17
30
78
37
4
22
9
10
1
17
11
81
23
2
38
11
12
9
12
25
4
0
16
8
24
53
-. ' '7-'
Hi ',
3
Total
1083
155
47
1290
                                         19

-------
        National  Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by EPA  Region)
             September 1995
Final
Reg
1






2
x



3






4








5






6


. -V-

State/Territory
Connecticut
Massachusetts
Maine
New Hampshire
Rhode Island
Vermont

New Jersey
New York
Puerto Rico
Virgin Islands

District of Columbia
Delaware
Maryland
Pennsylvania
Virginia
West Virginia

Alabama
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
Mississippi
North Carolina
South Carolina
Tennessee

Illinois
Indiana
Michigan
Minnesota
Ohio
Wisconsin

Arkansas
Louisiana
New .Mexico
Oklahoma
Texas • • . • '
Gen
14
22
7
16
10
8
77
99
76
8
0
183
0
18
8
95
18
4
143
9
48
11
19
2
21
23
13
146
33
32
74
34
31
40
244
12
13
8
• * 9
24
Fed
1
8
3
1
2
0
15
6
4
1
i 0
11
0
1
4
5
6
2
18
3
5
2
1
0
2
2
3
18
4
0
0
3
3
0
10
0
1
2
1
4
Proposed
Gen
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
3
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
1
4
0
0
2
0
0
1
8
0
1
1
0
2
0
4
0
3
1
1
1
Fed
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
• 1
0
0
1
0
2
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
Total
15
. 30
11
17
12
8
93
106
80
9
2
197
0
19
14
102
24
6
165
13
57
13
20
4
23
25
18
173
37
33
76
37
38
40
261
12
17
11
11
29
                66
80
                 20

-------
                          National  Priorities  List
                  Final  and Proposed Sites  (by EPA Region)
                               September  1995
Reg  State/Territory
  7   Iowa
      Kansas
      Missouri
      Nebraska
      Colorado
      Montana
      North Dakota
      South Dakota
      Utah
      Wyoming
      American Samoa
      Arizona
      California
      Guam
      Hawaii
      Nevada
      Trust Territories
 10
Alaska
Idaho
Oregon
Washington
F i na I
Gen
16
9
19
8
	
52
13
8
2
2
8
2
35
Marianas 0
0
7
69
1
1
1
•s 0
79
2
6
9
35
Fed
1
1
3
1
	
6
3
0
0
1
4
1
9
0
0
3
23
1
3
0
0
30
6
2
2
"18
Proposed
. Gen
1
.1
0
1
— -
3
2
1
0
1
4
0
8
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
4
0
2
1
0
Fed
0
1
0
0
	
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
18
12
22
10
~~"~ f
62
18
9
2
4Vi
16
3
52
0
0
10
96
2
4
1
0
113
8
10
12
53
                                  52
                                    28
                  83
                  Total
                           1077    153
42
1279
                                   21

-------
  FEDERAL REGISTER
       NOTICES
Date/Citation/Number of
        Sites
Date
October 23, 1981
115 ("Interim Priorities List")1
July 23, 1982
45 ("Expanded Eligibility List")1
December 30, 1982 (47 FR 58476)
418 (proposal of first NPL, including 153 of 160 sites
announced previously)
March 4, 1983 (48 FR 9311)
1 (proposal of Times Beach, Missouri)
September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40658)
406 (promulgation of first NPL; 1 proposed site split into 2
sites; 1 site deleted; 6 proposed sites dropped; 7 sites remain
proposed)
September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40674)
133 (Proposed Rule #1)
May 8, 1984 (49 FR 19480)
4 (promulgation of 4 San Gabriel Valley Sites in California,
part of Proposed Rule #1)
September 21, 1984 (49 FR 37070)
128 (promulgation of 123 Proposed Rule #1 sites and 5 from
original proposal; 4 proposed sites dropped)
October 15, 1984 (49 FR 40320)
244, including 36 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #2)
February 14, 1985 (50 FR 6320)
2 (promulgation of Glen Ridge and Montclair/West Orange
Radium Sites in New Jersey, part of Proposed Rule #2)
April 10, 1985 (50 FR 14115)
32, including 6 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #3)
September 16, 1985 (50 FR 37630)
1 (promulgation of. L^nsdowne Radiation Site in Pennsylvania,
part of Proposed Rule #3) _- ' ',.' \: '"''•'' ; - : : / ; }.
September 18, 1985 (50 FR 37950)
41, including 3 Federal facility sites and one reproposed site
(Proposed I Rule #4)
Number of Sites
Final




406
410
538
538
540
540
541
541
Proposed
115
160
418
419
140
136
4
248
246
278
••".'•<'• 277 •/,.:'';
318
Total
115
160
418
419
546
546
542
786
786
818
818
859
          22

-------
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
        (continued)
Date
June 10, 1986 (51 FR 21054)
170 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #1-4; 8 sites
deleted)
June 10, 1986 (51 FR 21099)
45, including 2 Federal Facility sites (Proposed Rule #5)
June 10, 1986 (51 FR 21109)
proposed RCRA policy; reopening of comment period for
5 sites
January 22, 1987 (52 FR 2492)
64, including 1 Federal facility site (Proposed Rule #6)
February 25, 1987 (52 FR 5578)
Availability of information
May 13, 1987 (52 FR 17991)
proposed RCRA policy for Federal facility sites
July 22, 1987 (52 FR 27620)
99 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-6)
July 22, 1987 (52 FR 27643)
7 (reproposal of Federal facility sites)
June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23978)
43 (reproposal of RCRA sites)
June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23988)
229, including 14 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #7)
August 9, 1988 (53 FR 30002/30005) .
RCRA policy statements
March 13, 1989 (54 FR 10512)
(8. Federal facility sites)
and
March 31, 1989 (54 FR 13296)
101 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-7;
4 proposed sites dropped)
MaySv 1989 (54 FR 19526) ?
46xpjfq^«i««M#8)v r*? v ; "• ;<;' . .•; ; ";,- : ; ;' ; , •'
JnIy;U|l!W9^5VF^2>82b) * f(. ::'^\ . \ .'••'' v?
52 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #9)
August 16, 1989 (54 FR 33846)
2 (proposal of AT SDR sites)
Number of Sites
Final
703
703


802
7993 ,

8903
890^;
889s
889
Proposed
185
2482

/
149
378

273
'./r:?*-2$$ >-^";
'••"' "335 •'"••;
337
Total
888
951


951
1,177

1,163
,:;x"-.t 1,173
•. ^ *.-.;• • -
1,224
1,226
            23

-------
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
        (continued)

Date
October 4, 1989 (54 FR 41000/41015)
93 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-8; 31
proposed sites dropped)
October 26, 1989 (54 FR 43778)
25, including 2 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #10, last
proposed rule under original HRS)
November 21, 1989 (54 FR 48184)
29 (promulgation of 27 Federal facility sites from Proposed Rule
#9 and 2 ATSDR sites; expansion of 1 Fedt.al facility site)
February 21, 1990 (55 FR 6154)
71 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-7, 9;
1 proposed site dropped)
March 14, 1990 (55 FR 9688)
1 (promulgation of United Heckathorn Co., Richmond,
California, part of Proposed Rule #10)
August 30, 1990 (55 FR 35502)
106 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2, 5-10; 10
proposed sites dropped)
February 11, 1991 (56 FR 5598)
6 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2, 5-7, 10;
14 proposed sites dropped) (last final rule under original HRS)
May 9, 1991 (56 FR 21460)
1 (proposal of ATSDR site)
July 29, 1991 (56 FR 35840)
22 (Proposed Rule #11, firsi proposed rule under revised HRS)
September 25, 1991 (56 FR 48438)
1 (promulgation of ATSDR site)
February 7, 1992 (57 FR 4824)
30 (Proposed Rule #12)
October 14, 1992 (57 FR 47181)
33 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #1 1 and 12);
first final rule under revised HRS
October 14, 1992 (57 FR%7204) "• :'^; '. * "•.,- ' " "' '. ' .' '" i
9 (Proposed Rule;#l3) - - "' ; ' ; =•'. . ..
May 10, 1993 (58 FR 27507)
26 (Proposed Rule #14)
P
Final
9813
981
1,010
1,081
1,082
1.1873
1.1893
1.1883
1,188
1.1853
1.1833

- i,2083-4 ;

•t
1.2023-4 .
dumber of Sit
Proposed
213
,238
209
137
136
20
0
1
23
22
52
' • •' .'.-'•'
' '..-.-'v ..;28x-' ; : .•-
: -' -.--"•
. .-•/-,-- ' - -. v. '_ - '
54
es
Total
1,194
1,219
1,219
1,218
1,218
1,207
1,189
1,189
1,211
1,207
1,235

: *'., 1,236
"'" * " '- * ,
1,256
            24

-------
                        FEDERAL  REGISTER NOTICES
                                     (continued)
Date
June 23, 1993 (58 FR 34018)
17 (Proposed Rule #15)
January 18, 1994 (59 FR 2568)
26 (Proposed Rule #16)
February 23, 1994 (59 FR 8724)
1 (promulgation of ALCOA (Point Comfort)/Lavaca Bay, Point
Comfort, Texas) ,
May 31, 1994 (59 FR 27989)
42 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #11-16)
August 23, 1994 (59 FR 43314)
10 (Proposed Rule #17)
December 16, 1994 (59 FR 65206)
18 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #12-14, 16 and
17)
February 13, 1995 (60 FR 8212)
9 (Proposed Rule #18)
April 25, 1995 (60 FR 20330)
4 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #11, 15, and 16)
May 26, 1995 (60 FR 27896)
1 (promulgation of site from Proposed Rule #18)
September 1995
12 (Proposed Rule #19)
September 1995
8 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #12, 14, 17, and
18)
Number of Sites
Final
1.1993-4
1.1923
1,191*
1,232s
1,232
1,242s
1,24 13
1,238s
1,237s
1 2383-4
Proposed
71
97
96
54
64
46
55
50
49
52
Total
1,270
1,289
1,287
1,286
1296
1,288
1,296
1,288
1,286
1,^90
'No Federal Register notice.
'Silver Creek Tailings, Park City, UT, removed October 17, 1986 as required by CERCLA Section 118(p).
'Reflects site(s) deleted since last rule.
4Reflects site(s) removed since last rule.
'Reflects sites(s) withdrawn since last rule.   '  -
                                            25

-------