United States Office of Publication 9320.7-051
Environmental Protection Solid Waste and January 1994
Agency Emergency Response
v>EPASupplementary Materials:
National Priorities List,
Proposed Rule
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response Intermittent Bulletin
Hazardous Site Evaluation Division (5204G)
Volume 3, Number 3
The National Priorities List (NPL) informs the Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) as amended by the
public of uncontrolled hazardous waste sites that Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
warrant further investigation to determine if they pose 1986 (SARA). In October 1990, CERCLA was
risks to human health or the environment. Such sites extended to September 30, 1994. The U.S.
are eligible for long-term "remedial action" financed Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has the
under the Trust Fund established by the Comprehen- primary responsibility for managing the Superfund
sive Environmental Response, Compensation, and program.
Table of Contents
How Sites Are Placed on the NPL 2
Statutory Requirements and Listing Policies . 3
NPL Status (November 1993) 4
How Sites Are Deleted From the NPL 5
Key Dates In Superfund 6
Removing Proposed Sites 7
Lists and Data Summaries 8
Federal Facilities Section (by State) . . . 9
Proposed Sites (by State) 14
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPL 18
NPL Sites Per State/Territory (by Total Sites) . . . .? 23
NPL Sites Per EPA Region 24
Federal Register Notices 26
-------
HOW SITES ARE PLACED
ON THE NPL
EPA uses informal rulemaking to place sites on
the NPL. Sites are first proposed to the NPL in the
Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments
on the sites (typically for 60 days), responds to the
comments, and finally places on the NPL those sites
that continue to meet the requirements for listing.
Section 300.425(c) of the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP), the Federal regulation by which CERCLA is
implemented (55 FR 8845, March 8, 1990), provides
three mechanisms for placing sites on the NPL. The
primary mechanism is EPA's Hazard Ranking System
(HRS). The original HRS, developed in 1982,
evaluated the relative threat a site posed to human
health or the environment over five "pathways," or
routes of exposure. The HRS score was based on the
evaluation of three pathways through which
contaminants can migrate: ground water, surface
water, and air. The other two pathways, direct
contact and fire/explosion, were evaluated to
determine the need for immediate removal
(emergency) action. HRS scores ranged from 0 to
100. An HRS score of 28.50 was selected as the
cutoff point for the first proposed NPL to identify at
least 400 sites, the minimum suggested by CERCLA.
On December 14, 1990 (55 FR 51532), EPA
revised the HRS, as required by SARA. The revised
HRS became effective on March 14, 1991. It is a
more comprehensive and accurate scoring system
than the original HRS and may add new types of sites
to the NPL.
The revised HRS retains the same cutoff score
and basic approach as the original HRS, while
incorporating SARA requirements as well as
improvements identified as necessary by EPA and the
public. The revised HRS retains the ground water,
surface water, and air pathways, drops the direct
contact and fire/explosion pathways, and adds a
fourth pathway, soil exposure. All four can be used
to calculate the site score.
The second mechanism for placing sites on the
NPL allows States or Territories to designate one top-
priority site regardless of score. Of the 57 States and
Territories, 39 have designated top-priority sites. Six
of these sites have been deleted from the NPL
because no further response was necessary.
The third mechanism allows listing a site if it
meets all three of these requirements:
• The Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry (ATSDR) of the U.S.
Public Health Service has issued a health
advisory that recommends removing people
from the site.
• EPA determines the site poses a significant
threat to public health.
• EPA anticipates it will be more cost-
effective to use its remedial authority
(available only at NPL sites) than to use its
emergency removal authority to respond to
the site.
Nine sites have been proposed to the NPL on the
basis of ATSDR advisories:
• Three are proposed to the NPL:
Ray mark Industries, Inc., Stratford,
CT; Lower Ecorse Creek Dump,
Wyandotte, MI; and Tennessee
Products, Chattanooga, TN.
• Four are on the NPL: Forest Glen Mobile
Home Subdivision, Niagara Falls, NY, and
Radium Chemical Co., Inc., New York
City, NY (54 FR 48184, November 21,
1989); White Chemical Corp., Newark NJ
(56 FR 48438, September 25, 1991); and
Austin Avenue Radiation Site, Delaware
County, PA (57 FR 47181, October 14,
1992).
• One, Lansdowne Radiation Site, Lansdowne,
PA has been deleted because all appropriate
response has been completed (56 FR 46121,
September 10, 1991).
• One, Quail Run Mobile Manor, Gray
Summit, MO (48 FR 40674, September 8,
1983) was dropped from further
consideration on February 11, 1991 (56 FR
5598). Because of an EPA removal action,
ATSDR had rescinded its health advisory.
-------
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
AND LISTING POLICIES
CERCLA restricts EPA's authority to respond to
certain sites by expressly excluding some
substances — petroleum, for example — from the
definition of "release." In addition, as a matter of
policy, EPA may choose not to use CERCLA
because the Federal government can undertake or
enforce cleanup under other laws, thus preserving
CERCLA funds for sites not covered by other laws.
EPA has chosen not to use CERCLA for certain
types of sites regulated by Subtitle C of the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRG). However,
if EPA later determines that sites not listed as a
matter of policy are not being properly responded to,
it may consider placing them on the NPL.
RCRA-Related Sites
When the first final NPL was promulgated in
September 1983, EPA announced certain listing
policies relating to sites that might qualify for the
NPL. One of these policies involved facilities subject
to RCRA Subtitle C. EPA's policy was generally not
to place on the NPL, RCRA "regulated units" (for
example, land disposal units that received hazardous
waste after the effective date of the RCRA land
disposal regulations) because EPA can require the
owner/operator to clean up under RCRA. The
RCRA cleanup process and standards are similar to
those under CERCLA, ensuring that all actions taken
will protect human health and the environment.
In November 1984, the Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments (HSWA) to RCRA were enacted,
expanding EPA's authority to require corrective
measures under Subtitle C. As a result of this
broadened RCRA authority, EPA revised its policy
for placing non-Federal RCRA-regulated sites on the
NPL, and on June 10, 1986 (54 FR 21057)
announced that facilities subject to RCRA Subtitle C
corrective action authorities would be placed on the
NPL if one or more of these conditions exists:
• The facilities are owned by persons who
have demonstrated an inability to finance
appropriate corrective action by invoking
bankruptcy laws.
• The facilities have lost authorization to
operate (also known as the Loss of Interim
Status, or LOIS provision), and there are
additional indications that the owner or
operator is unwilling to undertake
corrective action.
• The facilities have not lost authorization to
operate but have a clear history of
unwillingness to undertake corrective action.
These situations are determined on a case-
by-case basis.
On June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23978) and October 9,
1989 (54 FR 41000), EPA announced additional
components of the NPL/RCRA policy. As a matter
of policy, EPA will list four additional categories of
RCRA-related sites:
• Facilities that were treating, storing, or
disposing of Subtitle C hazardous waste after
November 19, 1980, but that did not file a
"Part A," the initial part of the permit
application, by that date as required and
have little or no history of compliance with
RCRA. EPA believes that these non- or
late filers, although they are technically
subject to RCRA, are not likely to be
cleaned up expeditiously under RCRA and
so should be on the NPL. However, if such
facilities have complied with RCRA, EPA
may consider whether listing is necessary.
• Facilities with permits for the treatment,
storage, or disposal of hazardous waste
issued before enactment of HSWA, and
whose owners/operators will not voluntarily
modify the permit. Pre-HSWA permittees
are not required to take corrective action for
releases. Under RCRA Section 3004(u),
EPA does not have the authority to modify
a pre-HSWA permit for corrective action
until the permit is reissued. Many pre-
HSWA permits are for 10 years. Since the
last pre-HSWA permit was issued prior to
November 8, 1984, it could be 1994 before
EPA could modify some permits to include
corrective action. In these cases, EPA
believes CERCLA authorities will result in
the most expeditious cleanup.
-------
NPL Status (January 1994)
Sites on final NPL
• General Superfund Section
• Federal Facilities Section
Sites remaining on proposed NPL
• General Superfund Section
• Federal Facilities Section
Construction Completion List
Sites dropped from proposed NPL
• Policy issues (e.g., RCRA)
• MRS score below 28.50
*AII but 1 in General Superfund Section
(1,069)
(123)
(67)
(30)
1,132
1,289
217<
(43)
(33)
76
• Facilities that filed a Part A permit application
for treatment, storage, or disposal of Subtitle C
hazardous waste as a precautionary measure
only. Such facilities — for example,
generators, transporters, or recyclers of
hazardous waste — are not subject to Subtitle C
corrective action authorities. These are
referred to as protective filers.
• Facilities that at one time treated or stored
Subtitle C hazardous waste but have since
converted to generator-only status (i.e.,
facilities that now store hazardous waste for 90
days or less) or any .other hazardous waste
activity not requiring Interim Status. These
facilities, whose Part A permit applications
have been withdrawn with EPA or State
approval, are referred to as converters. EPA
believes it has the authority under RCRA
Section 3008(u) to compel corrective action at
such facilities. However, RCRA's corrective
action program currently focuses primarily on
treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (due
to permitting deadlines in RCRA). Therefore,
this category should be on the NPL to ensure
expeditious cleanup. However, if a consent
order requiring remedial action is in effect, a
converter need not be listed.
Federal Facility Sites
CERCLA Section 120(a) requires that Federal
facilities be subject to and comply with CERCLA in
the same manner as any nongovernmental entity.
CERCLA Section lll(e)(3), however, generally
prohibits use of the Trust Fund for remedial actions
at Federally owned facilities. Thus, Federal agencies
must use their own funds for cleanup. Federal sites
are listed in a separate section of Appendix B, rather
than in the General Superfund Section.
Because most Federal facilities have RCRA-
regulated units within their boundaries, EPA
determined that a separate NPL/RCRA policy should
be adopted for Federal facilities. As a result, on
March 13, 1989 (54 FR 10520), EPA announced it
would place on the NPL those sites located on
Federally owned or operated facilities that meet the
NPL eligibility requirements -- e.g., HRS scores of
28.50 or greater — even if the Federal facility also is
subject to the corrective action authorities of RCRA
Subtitle C. Cleanup, if appropriate, could then
proceed at those sites under either CERCLA or
RCRA. The policy is based on several
considerations:
-------
• Congress clearly blended that Federal facility
sites should be on the NPL.
• Strict application of the non-Federal
NPL/RCRA policy would exclude virtually all
Federal facility sites from the NPL because
they would not likely meet any of the criteria
necessary for listing (inability to pay as
evidenced by invocation of bankruptcy laws or
demonstrated unwillingness to comply with
RCRA).
• Placing RCRA-regulated Federal sites on the
NPL serves the primary purpose of listing
Federal facility sites to advise the public of the
status of Federal government cleanup efforts.
• Listing these sites helps Federal agencies set
priorities and focus cleanup efforts on those
sites that present the most serious problem.
Radioactive Release Sites
CERCLA Section 101(22) excludes several types
of releases of radioactive materials from the statutory
definition of "release." These releases are therefore
not eligible for CERCLA response actions or the
NPL. The exclusions apply to (1) releases of source,
by-product, or special nuclear material from a nuclear
incident if these releases are subject to financial
protection requirements under Section 170 of the
Atomic Energy Act and (2) any releases of source,
by-product, or special nuclear material from any
processing site designated under the Uranium Mill
Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978.
Accordingly, such radioactive releases have not been
considered eligible for the NPL.
As a policy matter, EPA has also chosen not to
list releases of source, by-product, or special nuclear
material from any facility with a current license
issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC), on the grounds that NRC has full authority to
require cleanup of releases from such facilities. EPA
will, however, list releases from facilities that hold a
current license issued by a State pursuant to an
agreement between the State and the NRC under
Section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act. Facilities
whose licenses are no longer in effect are also
considered for listing.
HOW SITES ARE DELETED
FROM THE NPL
EPA may delete a final NPL site if it determines
that no further response is required to protect human
health or the environment. Under Section 300.425(e)
of the NCP (55 FR 8845, March 8, 1990,) a site may
be deleted where no further response is appropriate if
EPA determines that one of the following criteria has
been met:
• EPA, in conjunction with the State, has
determined that responsible or other parties
have implemented all appropriate response
action required.
• EPA, in consultation with the State, has
determined that all appropriate Superfund-
financed response under CERCLA has been
implemented, and that no further response by
responsible parties is appropriate.
• A remedial investigation has shown that the
release poses no significant threat to public
health or the environment, and, therefore
remedial measures are not appropriate.
Since 1986, EPA has followed these procedures
for deleting a site from the NPL:
• The Regional Administrator approves a "close-
out report" which establishes that all
appropriate response action has been taken or
that no action is required.
• The Regional Office obtains State concurrence.
• EPA publishes a notice of intent to delete in
the Federal Register and in a major newspaper
near the community involved. A public
comment period is provided.
• EPA responds to the comments and. if the site
continues to warrant deletion, publishes a
deletion notice in the Federal Register.
Sites that have been deleted from the NPL remain
eligible for further Superfund-financed remedial
action in the unlikely event that conditions in the
future warrant such action.
As of January 1994, 56 sites have been deleted
from the NPL, all in the General Superfund Section.
-------
Key Dates in Superfund
Legislation
• Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA) enacted December 11, 1980; Trust Fund of $1.6 billion
authorized over 5 years
• CERCLA amended by Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
(SARA) enacted October 17, 1986; Trust Fund of $8.5 billion authorized
over 5 years
• CERCLA extended to September 30, 1994; an additional $5.1 billion
authorized
Federal regulation implementing Superfund: National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP)
• Revised July 16,1982 (47 FR 31180) to incorporate CERCLA requirements
• Revised March 8, 1990 (55 FR 8666) in response to CERCLA Section 105,
amended by SARA
Hazard Ranking System
• Promulgated July 16, 1982 (47 FR 31180) as Appendix A of the NCP
• Revised December 14, 1990 (55 FR 51532) in response to CERCLA
Section 105(c), added by SARA; effective date March 14, 1991
National Priorities List
• Promulgated September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40658) as Appendix B of the NCP
• Must be updated at least annually
• Last sites proposed under original MRS promulgated February 11, 1991 (56
FR 5598); Construction Completion category activated (56 FR 5634)
• First sites proposed under revised HRS July 29, 1991 (56 FR 35840)
• First sites added to NPL under revised HRS October 14, 1992 (57 FR
47181)
• Construction Completion List activated March 2, 1993 (58 FR 12142)
-------
REMOVING PROPOSED SITES
As of January 1994, 76 sites (see page 17) have
been proposed for the NPL but subsequently removed
from further consideration, most of them because
their final HRS scores were below the 28.50 cutoff or
they are subject to RCRA Subtitle C. Three of the
sites were reproposed on February 7, 1992 (57 FR
4824) after being rescored with the revised HRS.
-------
LISTS AND DATA SUMMARIES
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
January 1994
Date
St
AK
AK
AK
AK
AK
AK
AL
AL
AL
AZ
AZ
AZ
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA.
CA
CO
CO
CO
Site Name
Adak Naval Air Station
Eielson Air Force Base
Elmendorf Air Force Base
Fort Richardson (US Army-)
Fort Uainwright
Standard Steel&Metals Salvage Yard(USOOT
4 Final * 2 Proposed = 6
Alabama Army Ammunition Plant
Amis ton Army Depot (SE Industrial Area)
Redstone Arsenal (US Army/NASA)
2 Final » 1 Proposed = 3
Luke Air Force Base
Will Jams Air Force Base
Yuma Marine Corps Air Station
3 Final «• 0 Proposed = 3
Barstou Marine Corps Logistics Base
Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base
Castle Air Force Base
Concord Naval Weapons Station
Edwards Air Force Base
El Toro Marine Corps Air Station
Fort Ord
George Air Force Base
Jet Propulsion Laboratory (NASA)
LEHR/Old Campus Landfill (USDOE)
Lawrence Livermore Laboratory (Site 300)
Lawrence Livermore Laboratory (USDOE)
March Air Force Base
Mather Air Force Base
McClellan Air Force Base (GU Contain)
Moffett Naval Air Station
Norton Air Force Base
Riverbank Army Ammunition Plant
Sacramento Army Depot
Sharpe Army Depot
Tracy Defense Depot
Travis Air Force Base
Treasure Island Naval Station-Hun Pt An
21 Final * 2 Proposed = 23
Air Force Plant PJKS
Rocky Flats Plant (USDOE)
Rocky Mountain Arsenal
City/County
Adak
Fairbanks N Star Bor
Greater Anchorage Bo
Anchorage
Fairbanks N Star Bor
Anchorage
Childersburg
Anniston
Huntsville
Glendale
Chandler
Yuma
Barstou
San Oiego County
Merced
Concord
Kern County
El Toro
Marina
Victorville
Pasadena
Davis
Livermore
L i vermore
Riverside
Sacramento
Sacramento
Sunnyvale
San Bernardino
Riverbank
Sacramento
Lathrop
Tracy
Solano County
San Francisco
Uaterton
Golden
Adams County
Proposed
10/92
07/89
07/89
06/93
07/89
07/89
10/84
10/84
06/93
07/89
07/89
06/88
07/89
07/89
10/84
02/92
07/89
06/88
07/89
07/89
02/92
01/94
07/89
10/84
07/89
10/84
10/84
04/85
10/84
06/88
10/84
10/84
07/89
07/89
07/89
07/89
10/84
10/84
Final
11/89
08/90
08/90
08/90
07/87
03/89
08/90
11/89
02/90
11/89
11/89
07/87
08/90
02/90
02/90
02/90
10/92
08/90
07/87
11/89
07/87
07/87
07/87
07/87
02/90
07/87
07/87
08/90
11/89
11/89
11/89
10/89
07/87
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
CT New London Submarine Base
1 Final * 0 Proposed = 1
OE Dover Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
New London
Dover
10/89 08/90
10/84 03/89
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
January 1994
Date
St
FL
FL
FL
FL
FL
GA
GA
GU
HI
HI
HI
IA
ID
ID
IL
IL
IL
IL
Site Name
Cecil Field Naval Air Station
Homestead Air Force Base
Jacksonville Naval Air Station
Pensacola Naval Air Station
Whiting Field Naval Air Station
4 Final + 1 Proposed = 5
Marine Corps Logistics Base
Robins Air Force Base(Lf#4/S lodge lagoon
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
Andersen Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Naval Computer & Telecommunications Area
Pearl Harbor Naval Complex
Schofield Barracks
2 Final + 1 Proposed = 3
Iowa Army Ammunition Plant
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Idaho National Engineering Lab (USDOE)
Mountain Home Air Force Base
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
Joliet Army Ammunition Plant (LAP Area)
Joliet Army Ammunition Plant (Mfg Area)
Sangamo Electric/Crab Orchard NWR (USDOI
Savanna Army Depot Activity
City/County
Jacksonvi lie
Homestead
Jacksonvi lie
Pensacola
Milton
Albany
Houston County
Yigo
Oahu
Pearl Harbor
Oahu
,
Middletown
Idaho Falls
Mountain Home
Joliet
Joliet
Carterville
Savanna
Proposed
07/89
07/89
07/89
07/89
01/94
07/89
10/84
02/92
01/94
07/91
07/89
07/89
07/89
07/89
04/85
10/84
10/84
10/84
Final
11/89
08/90
11/89
11/89
11/89
07/87
10/92
10/92
08/90
08/90
11/89
08/90
03/89
07/87
07/87
03/89
4 Final * 0 Proposed = 4
KS Fort Riley
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
KY Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (USDOE)
0 Final + 1 Proposed = 1
LA Louisiana Army Ammunition Plant
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
MA Fort Devens
MA Fort Devens-Sudbury Training Annex
MA Hanscom Air Force Base
MA Materials Technology Laboratory(US Army)
MA Natick Laboratory Army Research,D&E Cntr
MA Naval Weapons Industrial Reserve Plant
MA Otis Air National Guard /Camp Edwards
MA South Weymouth Naval Air Station
3 Final + 5 Proposed = 8
Junction City
Paducah
Doyline
Fort Devens
Middlesex County
Bedford
Watertown
Natick
Bedford
Falmouth
Weymouth
07/89 08/90
05/93
10/84 03/89
07/89
07/89
05/93
06/93
05/93
06/93
07/89
06/93
11/89
02/90
11/89
10
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
January 1994
Date
St
MO
HD
MO
MO
ME
ME
ME
MI
MN
MN
MO
MO
HO
NC
NE
NH
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NM
NM
NY
NY
NY
NY
Site Name
Aberdeen Proving Ground (Edgewood Area)
Aberdeen Proving Ground(Michaelsvi I le LF
Beltsville Agricultural Research (USD A)
Patuxent Naval Air Station
2 Final + 2 Proposed = 4
Brunswick Naval Air Station
Lor ing Air Force Base
Portsmouth Naval Shipyard
2 Final * 1 Proposed = 3
Wurtsmith Air Force Base
0 Final + 1 Proposed = 1
Naval Industrial Reserve Ordnance Plant
Twin Cities Air Force Base(SAR Landfill)
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
Lake City Army Aimu. Plant (NU Lagoon)
Ueldon Spring Former Army Ordnance Works
Weldon Spring Quarry/Plant/Pi tts(USOOE)
3 Final + 0 Proposed = 3
Camp Lejeune Military Reservation
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Cornhusker Army Ammunition Plant
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Pease Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Federal Aviation Admin. Tech. CntrdJSDOT
Fort Oix (Landfill Site)
Naval Air Engineering Center
Naval Weapons Station Earle (Site A)
Picatirmy Arsenal
U.R. Grace/Wayne Interim Storage (USDOE)
6 Final » 0 Proposed = 6
Cal West Metals (USSBA)
Lee Acres Landfill (USDOI)
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
Brookhaven National Laboratory (USDOE)
Griffiss Air Force Base
Plattsburgh Air Force Base
Seneca Army Depot
City/County
Edgewood
Aberdeen
Beltsville
St. Mary's Co.
Brunswick
Limestone
Kittery
losco County
Fridley
Minneapolis
Independence
St. Charles County
St. Charles County
Ons low County
Hall County
Portsmouth/Newington
Atlantic County
Pemberton Township
Lakehurst
Colts Neck
Rockaway Township
Uayne Township
Lemitar
Farmington
Upton
Rome
Plattsburgh
Romulus
Proposed
04/85
04/85
05/93
01/94
10/84
07/89
06/93
01/94
07/89
01/87
10/84
10/84
07/89
06/88
10/84
07/89
07/89
10/84
09/85
10/84
07/89
09/83
06/88
06/88
07/89
10/84
07/89
07/89
Final
02/90
10/89
07/87
02/90
11/89
07/87
07/87
07/87
02/90
10/89
07/87
02/90
08/90
07/87
07/87
08/90
02/90
09/84
03/89
08/90
11/89
07/87
11/89
08/90
4 Final + 0 Proposed = 4
11
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
January 1994
st
OH
OH
OH
OH
OH
OK
OR
OR
PA
PA
PA
PA
PA
PR
RI
RI
SC
SO
TN
TN
TN
TX
TX
TX
TX
UT
UT
UT
UT
Site Name
Air Force Plant 85
Feed Materials Production Center (USOOE)
Hound Plant (USOOE)
Rickenbacker Air National Guard Base
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base
3 Final * 2 Proposed = 5
Tinker Air Force(Soldier Cr/Bldg 300)
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Fremont Nat. Forest Uranium Mines (USD A)
Umatilla Army Depot (Lagoons)
1 Final + 1 Proposed = 2
Letterkemy Army Depot (PDO Area)
Letterkenny Army Depot (SE Area)
Naval Air Development Center(8 Areas)
Navy Ships Parts Control Center
Tobyhanna Army Depot
4 Final «• 1 Proposed = 5
Naval Security Group Activity
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Davisville Naval Construction Batt Cent
Newport Naval Education/Training Center
2 Final + 0 Proposed = 2
Savannah River Site (USOOE)
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Ellsworth Air Force Base
1 Final + 0 Proposed = 1
Memphis Defense Depot
Milan Army Ammunition Plant
Oak Ridge Reservation (USOOE)
3 Final * 0 Proposed = 3
Air Force Plant #4 (General Dynamics)
Lone Star Army Ammunition Plant
Longhorn Army Annum t ion Plant
Pantex Plant (USDOE)
3 Final + 1 Proposed = 4
Hill Air Force Base
Monticello Mill Tailings (USDOE)
Ogden Defense Depot
Tooele Army Depot (North Area)
City/County
Columbus
Fernald
Hiamisburg
Lockbourne
Dayton
Oklahoma City
Lake County
Hermiston
Franklin County
Chambersburg
Warminster Township
Mechanicsburg
Tobyhanna
Sabana Seca
North Kingstown
Newport
Aiken
Rapid City
Memphis
Mi Ian
Oak Ridge
Fort Worth
Texarkana
Karnack •
Pantex Village
Ogden
Monticello
Ogden
Tooele
Dat
Proposed
01/94
07/89
07/89
01/94
06/88
04/85
06/93
10/84
04/85
10/84
06/86
01/94
07/89
06/88
07/89
07/89
07/89
10/89
..„„ . . .
02/92
10/84
07/89
10/84
10/84
07/89
07/91
10/84
07/89
10/84
10/84
:e
Final
11/89
11/89
10/89
07/87
07/87
03/89
07/87
10/89
08/90
10/89
11/89
11/89
11/89
08/90
10/92
07/87
11/89
08/90
07/87
08/90
07/87
11/89
07/87
08/90
Final » 0 Proposed = 4
12
-------
National Priorities List
Federal Facilities Section, Final and Proposed Sites (by State)
January 1994
St Site Name
City/County
Date
Proposed Final
VA Defense General Supply Center
VA Fort Eustis (US Army)
VA Langley Air Force Base/NASA Langley Cntr
VA Marine Corps Combat Development Command
VA Naval Surface Warfare - Dahlgren
VA Naval Weapons Station - Yorktown
3 Final * 3 Proposed = 6
UA Bangor Naval Submarine Base
WA Bangor Ordnance Disposal
UA Bonneville Power Admin Ross (USDOE)
UA Fairchild Air Force Base (4 Waste Areas)
UA Fort Lewis (Landfill No. 5)
UA Fort Lewis Logistics Center
UA Hamilton Island Landf i IKUSA/COE)
UA Hanford 100-Area (USDOE)
UA Hanford 1100-Area (USDOE)
UA Hanford 200-Area (USDOE)
UA Hanford 300-Area (USDOE)
UA Jackson Park Housing Complex (US Navy)
UA McChord Air Force Base (Wash Rack/Treat)
UA Naval Air Station, Whidbey Is (Seaplane)
UA Naval Air Station. Whidbey Island (Ault)
UA Naval Undersea Warfare Station (4 Areas)
UA Old Navy Dump/Manchester Lab(USEPA/NOAA)
UA Port Hadlock Detachment (US Navy)
UA Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Complex
15 Final + 4 Proposed = 19
UV Allegany Ballistics Laboratory (US Navy)
0 Final * 1 Proposed = 1
UY F.E. Warren Air Force Base
1 Final * 0 Proposed = 1
123 Final + 30 Proposed = 153
Chesterfield County
Newport News
Hampton
Quantico
Dahlgren
Yorktown
Silverdale
Bremerton
Vancouver
Spokane County
Tacoma
Tillicum
North Bonneville
Benton County
Benton County
Benton County
Benton County
Kitsap County
Tacoma
Whidbey Island
Whidbey Island
Keyport
Kitsap County
Indian Island
Bremerton
Mineral County
Cheyenne
10/84
01/94
05/93
05/93
02/92
02/92
07/89
10/84
07/89
06/88
10/84
07/89
07/91
06/88
06/88
06/88
06/88
06/93
10/84
09/85
09/85
06/86
01/94
06/93
05/93
06/93
07/89 02/90
07/87
10/92
10/92
08/90
07/87
11/89
03/89
07/87
11/89
10/92
10/89
10/89
10/89
10/89
07/87
02/90
02/90
10/89
13
-------
National Priorities List
Proposed Sites, by State
January 1994
St
Site Name
Location
Notes
AK Federal Facility Sites
Adak Naval Air Station
Fort Richardson (US Army)
0 General Superfund Sites «• 2 Federal Facility Sites = 2
AL General Superfund Sites
Monarch Tile Manufacturing, Inc.
Federal Facility Sites
Redstone Arsenal (US Army/NASA)
1 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 2
CA General Superfund Sites
Cooper Drum Co.
Del Amo Facility
Frontier Fertilizer
GBF, Inc., Dump
Stoker Company
Federal Facility Sites
Concord Naval Weapons Station
LEHR/Old Campus Landfill (USDOE)
5 General Superfund Sites + 2 Federal Facility Sites = 7
CO General Superfund Sites
ASARCO, Inc. (Globe Plant)
SmeUertown Site
Summitvilie Mine
3 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 3
CT General Superfund Sites
Raymark Industries, Inc.
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
FL General Superfund Sites
8roward County--21st Manor Dump
Chevron Chemical Co. (Ortho Division)
Plymouth Avenue Landfill
Stauffer Chemical Co. (Tampa Plant)
Stauffer Chemical Co. (Tarpons Springs)
Federal Facility Sites
Whiting Field Naval Air Station
5 General Superfund Sites * 1 Federal Facility Sites = 6
HI General Superfund Sites
Del Monte Corp. (Oahu Plantation)
Federal Facility Sites
Naval Computer & Telecommunications Area
1 General Superfund.Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 2
IA General Superfund Sites
Mason City Coal Gasification Plant
Waterloo Coal Gasification Plant
2 General Superfund Sites * 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
ID General Superfund Sites
Blackbird Mine
Triumph Mine Tailings Piles
2 General Superfund Sites * 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
IN General Superfund Sites
U.S. Smelter & Lead Refinery Inc.
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
Adak
Anchorage
Florence
Huntsville
South Gate
Los Angeles
Davis
Antioch
Imperial
Concord
Davis
Denver
Salida
Rio Grande County
Stratford
Fort Lauderdale
Orlando
DeLand
Tampa
Tarpon Springs
Milton
Honolulu County
Oahu
Mason City
Waterloo
Lemhi County
Triumph
East Chicago
-------
National Priorities List
Proposed Sites, by State
January 1994
St
Site Name
Location
Notes
a
KS General Superfund Sites
Chemical Commodities. Inc.
1 General Superfund Sites * 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
KY General Superfund Sites
National Southwire Aluminum Co.
Federal Facility Sites
Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (USDOE)
1 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 2
LA General Superfund Sites
Lincoln Creosote
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
HA General Superfund Sites
Blackburn & Union Privileges
Federal Facility Sites
Hanscom Air Force Base
Materials Technology LaboratorydJS Army)
Natick Laboratory Army Research,O&E Cntr
Naval Weapons Industrial Reserve Plant
South Ueymouth Naval Air Station
1 General Superfund Sites + 5 Federal Facility Sites = 6
HO General Superfund Sites
Ordnance Products. Inc.
Spectron, Inc.
Federal Facility Sites
Beltsville Agricultural Research (USOA)
Patuxent Naval Air Station
2 General Superfund Sites + 2 Federal Facility Sites = 4
HE Federal Facility Sites
Portsmouth Naval Shipyard
0 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 1
HI General Superfund Sites
Lower Ecorse Creek Dump
Federal Facility Sites
Wurtsmith Air Force Base
1 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 2
HN General Superfund Sites
Lake Elmo Airport /GU Contamination
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
HS General Superfund Sites
Chemfax, Inc.
Potter Co.
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
NC General Superfund Sites
General Electric Co/Shepherd Farm
1 General Superfund Sites * 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
NE General Superfund Sites
American Shizuki/Ogallala Electronics Co
Bruno Co-op Association/Associated Prop
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
NJ General Superfund Sites
Horseshoe Road
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
Olathe
Hawesville
Paducah
Bossier City
Walpole
Bedford
Uatertown
Natick
Bedford
Ueymouth
Cecil County
Cecil County
Beltsville
St. Mary's Co.
Kittery
Uyandotte
losco County
Bavtown Township
Gulfport
Wesson
East Flat Rock
Ogallala
Bruno
Sayreville
15
-------
National Priorities List
Proposed Sites, by State
January 1994
St
Site Name
Location
Notes
a
NM
NY
OH
OK
OR
PA
SC
SO
TN
TX
General Superfund Sites
AT&SF (Albuquerque)
Rinchem Co., Inc.
2 General Superfund Sites
+ 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
General Superfund Sites
GCL Tie & Treating Inc.
Onondaga.Lake
Pfohl Brothers Landfill
3 General Superfund Sites +
0 Federal Facility Sites = 3
General Superfund Sites
Diamond Shamrock Corp(Painesvilie Works)
Dover Chemical Corp.
North Sanitary Landfill
Federal Facility Sites
Air Force Plant 85
Rickenbacker Air National Guard Base
3 General Superfund Sites * 2 Federal Facility Sites
General Superfund Sites
National Zinc Corp.
1 General Superfund Sites *
0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
UT
General Superfund Sites
East Multnomah County Ground Wtr Contain.
HcCormick & Baxter Creos. Co. (Portland)
Federal Facility Sites
Fremont Nat. Forest Uranium Mines (USDA)
2 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 3
General Superfund Sites
East Tenth Street
UGI Columbia Gas Plant
Federal Facility Sites
Navy Ships Parts Control Center
2 General Superfund Sites + 1 Federal Facility Sites = 3
General Superfund Sites
(Coppers Co., Inc. (Charleston Pint)
1 General Superfund Sites •»• 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
General Superfund Sites
Annie Creek Mine Tailings
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
General Superfund Sites
Chemet Co.
ICG Iselin Railroad Yard
Tennessee Products
3 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 3
General Superfund Sites
ALCOA (Point Comfort)/Lavaca Bay
RSR Corp.
Federal Facility Sites
Pantex Plant (USOOE)
2 General Superfund Sites * 1 Federal Facility Sites = 3
General Superfund Sites
Kennecott (North Zone)
Kennecott (South Zone)
Albuquerque
Albuquerque
Village of Sidney
Syracuse
Cheektowaga
Painesville
Dover
Dayton
Columbus
Lockbourne
Bartlesvilie
Multnomah County
Portland
Lake County
Marcus Hook
Columbia
Mechanicsburg
Charleston
Lead
Moscow
Jackson
Chattanooga
Point Comfort
Dallas
Pantex Village
Magna
Copperton
16
-------
National Priorities List
Proposed Sites, by State
January 1994
St
Site Name
Location
Notes
Murray Smelter
Richardson Flat Tailings
4 General Super-fund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 4
VA Federal Facility Sites
Fort Eustis (US Army)
Langley Air Force Base/NASA Langley Cntr
Marine Corps Combat Development Command
0 General Superfund Sites + 3 Federal Facility Sites = 3
VI General Superfund Sites
Island Chemical Corp/V.I. Chemical Corp
Tutu Wellfield
2 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 2
UA General Superfund Sites
Boomsnub/Airco
Pacific Sound Resources
Spokane Junkyard and Associated Prop
Tulalip Landfill
Vancouver Water Station #1 Contamination
Federal Facility Sites
Jackson Park Housing Complex (US Navy)
Old Navy Dump/Manchester Lab(USEPA/NOAA)
Port Hadlock Detachment (US Navy)
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard Complex
5 General Superfund Sites + 4 Federal Facility Sites = 9
UI General Superfund Sites
Ripon City Landfill
1 General Superfund Sites + 0 Federal Facility Sites = 1
WV Federal Facility Sites
Allegany Ballistics Laboratory (US Navy)
0 General Superfund Sites * 1 Federal Facility Sites = 1
67 General Superfund Sites + 30 Federal Facility Sites = 97
Murray City
Summit County
Newport News
Hampton
Quantico
St. Croix
Tutu
Vancouver
Seattle
Spokane County
Marysvitle
Vancouver
Kitsap County
Kitsap County
Indian Island
Bremerton
Fond Du Lac County
Mineral County
aA = Based on issuance of health advisory by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
(if scored, HRS score need not be > 28.50).
S = State top priority (included among the 100 top priority sites regardless of score).
17
-------
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPL
January 1994
Date
Removed
St
AR
AR
AR
AZ
AZ
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CO
DC
DE
Site Name
Allen Transformer
Crittenden County Landfill
Magnolia City Landfill
Kingman Airport Industrial Area
Mesa Area Ground Water Contamination
FMC Corp. (Fresno Plant)
Hewlett-Packard
IBM Corp. (San Jose Plant)
Kaiser Steel Corp.(Fontana Plant)
Kearney-KPF
Marley Cooling Tower Co.
Precision Monolithic, Inc.
Rhone-Poulenc, Inc./Zoecon Corp.
Signetics, Inc.
Solvent Service, Inc.
Southern Pacific Transportation
Van Waters & Rogers, Inc.
Martin-Marietta(0enver Aerospace)
USA Fort Lincoln Barrel Site
Old Brine Sludge Landfill
Location
Ft. Smith
Marion '
Magnolia
Kingman
Mesa
Fresno
Palo Alto
San Jose
Fontana
Stockton
Stockton
Santa Clara
East Palo Alto
Sunnyvale
San Jose
Rosevi lie
San Jose
Waterton
Washington
Delaware City
Proposed
10/23/81
47FR 58476
12/30/82
47FR 58476
10/26/89
54FR 43778
12/30/82
47FR 58476
6/10/86
51FR 21099
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
6/24/88
53FR 23988
6/24/88
53FR 23988
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
6/24/88
53FR 23988
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/23/81
9/08/83
Score3
12/30/82C
09/08/83
47FR 40658
08/30/90
55FR 35502
09/21 /84d
49FR 37070
06/10/86
51 FR 21054
09/24/84
Otherb
02/08/91
56FR 5598
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
08/30/90
53FR 35502
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
08/30/90
55FR 35502
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
12/30/826
47FR 58476
48FR 40674 49FR 37070
18
-------
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPL
January 1994
Date
Removed
St
OE
FL
FL
FL
GA
HI
HI
HI
HI
HI
HI
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
10
a
IL
IL
Site Name
Pigeon Point Landfill
Davidson Lumber Co.
Montco Research Products, Inc.
Pratt & Whitney Air/United Tech
01 in Corp. (Areas 1.2 & 4)
Kunia Wells I
Kunia Wells 11
Mil Hani Wells
Waiawa Shaft
Waipahu Wells
Waipio Heights Wells II
A.Y. McDonald Industries, Inc.
Chemplex Co.
Frit Industries (Humboldt Plant)
John Deere (Dubuque Works)
U.S. Nameplate Co.
Flynn Lumber Co.
Sheffield (US Ecology, Inc.)
Stauffer Chem (Chic Heights Pint)
Warner Electric Brake & Clutch Co
Location
New Castle
South Miami
Hoi lister
West Palm Beach
Augusta
Oahu
Oahu
Oahu
Oahu
Oahu
Oahu
Dubuque
Cl tnton/Camanche
Humboldt
Dubuque
Mount Vernon
Ca I dwell
Sheffield
Chicago Heights
Roscoe
Proposed
1/22/87
52FR 2492
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
9/18/85
50FR 37950
9/08/83
48FR 40674
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/15/84
49FR 40320
4/10/85
50FR 14115
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/15/84
49FR 40320
12/30/82
47FR 58476
10/15/84
49FR 40320
1/22/87
52FR 2492
6/24/88
53FR 23988
Score3
10/04/89
54FR 41015
06/10/86
51FR 21054
03/31/89
54FR 13296
09/08/83
48FR 40658
10/04/89
54FR 41015
Otherb
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
02/08/91 f
56FR 5598
02/08/91 f
56FR 5598
02/08/91 f
56FR 5598
02/08/91 f
56FR 5598
02/08/91 f
56FR 5598
02/08/91 f
56FR 5598
10/04/89
54FR 41000
02/08/91
56FR 5598
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
"
08/30/90
55FR 35502
19
-------
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPL
January 1994
Date
Removed
St
IN
IN
IN
KS
MI
MI
MI
Ml
MI
MI
MO
MO
MS
MS
MT
MT
NE
NE
NJ
NJ
Site Name
Firestone Industrial Products Co.
Mccarty's Bald Knob Landfill
Parrot Road Dump
National Industrial Environ Serv
E.I. du Pont (Montague Plant)
Ford Motor Co. (Sludge Lagoon)
Hooker (Montague Plant)
Lacks Industries, Inc.
Lenawee Disposal Service, Inc. Landfill
Littlefield Township Dump
Findett Corp.
Quail Run Mobile Manor
Gautier Oil Co., Inc.
Plastifax, Inc.
Burlington Northern(Somers Plant)
Comet Oil Co.
Monroe Auto Equipment Co. -
Phillips Chemical Co.
Horstmann's Dump
Jame Fine Chemical
Location
Noblesville
Mt. vernon
New Haven
Furley
Montague
Ypsilanti
Montague
Grand Rapids
Adrian
Oden
St. Charles
Gray Summit
Gautier
Gulf port
Somers
Billings
Cozad
Beatrice
East Hanover
Bound Brook
Proposed
9/18/85
50FR 37950
1/22/87
52FR 2492
12/30/82
47FR 58476
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
1/22/87
52FR 2492
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
12/30/82
47FR 58476
10/15/84
49FR 40320
9/08/83
48FR 40674
6/24/88
53FR 23988
7/23/82
10/15/84
49FR 40320
6/24/88
53 FR 23988
9/18/85
50FR 37950
12/30/82
47FR 58476
1/22/87
52FR 2492
10/15/84
49FR 40320
Score3
10/04/89
54FR 41015
09/08/83
48FR 40658
03/31/89
54FR 13296
08/30/90
55FR 35502
06/10/86
51FR 21054
09/21/84
49FR 37070
08/30/90
5FR 35502
09/08/83h
48FR 40658
02/08/91
56FR 5598
09/08/83
48FR 40658
03/31/89
54FR 13296
06/1 0/86 '
51FR 21054
Other6
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
02/08/91
56FR 5598
02/08/91 9
56FR 5598
02/08/91
56FR 5598
10/04/89
54FR 41000
•
20
-------
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPL
January 1994
Date
Removed
St
NJ
OH
OK
OK
PA
PA
TX
TX
UT
UT
UT
VA
WA
UA
WI
WV
Site Name
Mat tack. Inc.
General ElectricCCoshocton Plant)
Kerr-McGee Corp. (Gushing Plant)
Sunray Oil Co. Refinery
Keyser Avenue Borehole
Rohm and Haas Co. Landfill
Pig Road
Rio Grande Oil Co. Refinery
Mayflower Mountain Tailings Pond
Olson/Neihart Reservoir
Silver Creek Tailings
IBM Corp. (Manassas Plant Spill)
Quendall Terminal
Rosch Property
Fort Howard Paper Co. Lagoons
Mobay Chemical (New Martinsville)
Location
Woolwich Township
Coshocton
Cushing
Allen
Scranton
Bristol Township
New Waver I y
Sour Lake
Uasatch County
Uasatch County
Park City
Manassas
Renton
Roy
Green Bay
New Martinsville
Proposed
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/26/89
54FR 43778
6/24/88
53FR 23988
6/24/88
53FR 23988
4/10/85
50FR 14115
9/08/83
48FR 40674
6/24/88
53 FR 23988
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
9/18/85
50FR 37950
10/15/84
49FR 40320
10/15/84
49FR 40320
9/08/83
48FR 40674
6/24/88
53FR 23988
10/15/84
49FR 40320
Score3
02/08/91
56FR 5598
08/30/90
55FR 35502
02/21/90
55FR 6154
06/10/86
51FR 21054
08/30/90
55FR 35502
06/10/86
51FR 21054
03/31/89
54 FR 13296
06/10/86
51FR 21054
09/21/84
49FR 37070
08/30/90
53FR 35502
Otherb
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/1 7/86 J
10/04/89
54FR 41000
10/04/89
54FR 41000
Number of sites removed: 76
HRS score below 28.50.
Subject to RCRA Subtitle C, except as noted.
jOn Interim Priorities List announced October 23, 1981; removed at proposal of first NPL (47FR 58476, December 30, 1982).
Contamination occurs naturally
(Footnotes continue on the next page.)
21
-------
Proposed Sites Removed From Consideration for NPL
January 1994
Date
Removed
St Site Name Location Proposed Score Other
eOn Interim Priorities List announced October 23, 1981; removed at proposal of first NPL (47FR 58476, December 30, 1982),
fa Federal facility site and so ineligible at the time.
Pending development of EPA pesticide policy.
rHo longer meets health advisory issued by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
On Expanded Eligibility List announced July 23, 1982; removed at proposal of first NPL (47FR 58476, December 30, 1982)
.because State withdrew top-priority designation, MRS score below 28.50.
'included in Brook Industrial Park, listed October 4, 1989 (54FR 41015).
'Removed per SARA Section 118(p)
NOTE: The following four sites were proposed, removed, and then reproposed. In this case, the site has been listed:
• Van Dale Junkyard, Marietta, OH, proposed December 30, 1982 (47FR 58476); removed September 8, 1983 (48FR
40658); reproposed October 15, 1984 (49FR 40320); listed June 10, 1986 (51FR 21054).
These three sites have been reproposed under the revised HRS:
• Concord Naval Weapons Station, Concord, CA: proposed June 24, 1988 (53FR 23988); removed August 30, 1990 (55FR
35502); reproposed February 7, 1992 (57FR 4824).
• GBF, Inc., Antioch, CA: proposed June 24, 1988 (53FR 23988); removed October 4, 1989 (54FR 41015); reproposed
February 7, 1992 <57FR 4824).
• Richardson Flat Tailings, Summit County, UT: proposed June 24, 1988 (53FR 23988); removed February 11, 1991
(56FR 5598); reproposed February 7, 1992 (57FR 4824).
22
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites Per State/Territory
(by Proposed Rule #16)
January 1994
p
State/Territory
Utah
Tennessee
California
Florida
Michigan
Pennsylvania
Wash i ngton
Connecticut
Iowa
Kansas
Louisiana
New York
Virgin Islands
Ohio
Haua i i
Maryland
Virginia
Alabama
Alaska
American Samoa
Arizona
Arkansas
Colorado
Commonwealth of Marianas
Delaware
District of Columbia
Georgia
Guam
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Kentucky
Maine
Massachusetts
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
North Carolina
North Dakota
Oklahoma
Oregon
Puerto Rico
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Texas
Trust Territories
Vermont
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Total
-oposed R
Gen
3
2
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
ule #16
Fed
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
23
Total Pr
Gen
4
3
5
5
1
2
5
1
2
1
1
3
2
3
1
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
1
0
1
1
2
0
0
2
0
0
1
2
1
0
1
2
0
0
1
1
2
0
0
0
1
0
67
oposed
Fed
0
0
2
1
1
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
2
3
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
30
Total
Gen
8
11
68
47
76
94
32
14
16
8
11
78
0
30
0
7
19
10
2
0
7
12
12
0
18
0
11
1
6
33
32
18
7
21
38
2
20
8
7
1
16
102
7
20
2
9
8
8
10
22
2
24
0
8
5
39
2
1069
Final
Fed
4
3
21
4
0
4
15
1
1
1
1
4
0
3
2
2
3
2
4
0
3
0
3
0
1
0
2
1
2
4
0
0
2
3
2
0
3
0
1
0
1
6
2
1
0
1
1
1
2
1
1
3
0
0
0
0
1
123
Total
16
17
96
57
78
101
56
16
19
10
13
85
2
38
4
13
25
14
8
0
10
12
18
0
19
0
13
2
10
37
33
20
10
30
41
4
23
8
10
1
17
109
11
22
2
11
12
9
12
24
4
30
0
8
6
40
3
1289
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by EPA Region)
January 1994
Final
Reg
1
2
3
4
5
6
State/Territory
Connecticut
Massachusetts
Maine
New Hampshire
Rhode Island
Vermont
New Jersey
New York
Puerto Rico
Virgin Islands
District of Columbia
Delaware
Maryland
Pennsylvania
Virginia
west Virginia
Alabama
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
Mississippi
North Carolina
South Carolina
Tennessee
Illinois
Indiana
Michigan
Minnesota
Ohio
Ui scons in
Arkansas
Louisiana
New Mexico
Ok I ahoma
Texas
Gen
14
21
7
16
10
8
76
102
78
8
0
188
0
18
7
94
19
5
143
10
47
11
18
2
20
22
11
141
33
32
76
38
30
39
248
12
11
7
9
24
Fed
1
3
2
1
2
0
9
6
4
1
0
11
0
1
2
4
3
0
10
2
4
2
0
0
1
1
3
13
4
0
0
2 .
3
0
9
0
1
2
1
3
Proposed
Gen
1
1
0
0
0
0
2
1
3
0
2
6
0
0
2
2
0
0
4
1
5
0
1
2
1
1
3
14
0
1
1
1
3
1
7
0
1
2
1
2
Fed
0
5
1
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
3
1
7
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
1
0
2
0
3
0
0
0
0
1
Total
16
30
10
17
12
8
93
109
85
9
2
205
0
19
13
101
25
6
164
14
57
13
20
4
22
24
17
171
37
33
78
41
38
40
267
12
13
11
11
30
63
77
24
-------
National Priorities List
Final and Proposed Sites (by EPA Region)
January 1994
Final
Reg
7
8
9
10
State/Territory
Iowa
Kansas
Missouri
Nebraska
Colorado
Montana
North Dakota
South Dakota
Utah
Wyoming
Commonwealth of Marianas
American Samoa
Arizona
California
Guam
Hawaii
Nevada
Trust Territories
Alaska
Idaho
Oregon
Washington
Gen
16
8
20
7
51
12
8
2
2
8
2
34
0
0
7
68
1
0
1
0
77
2
6
8
32
Fed
1
1
3
1
6
3
0
0
1
4
1
9
0
0
3
21
1
2
0
0
27
4
2
1
15
Proposed
Gen
2
1
0
2
5
3
0
0
1
4
0
8
0
0
0
5
0
1
0
0
6
0
2
2
5
Fed
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
3
2
0
1
4
Total
19
10
23
10
62
18
8
2
4
16
3
51
0
0
10
96
2
4
1
0
113
8
10
12
56
48
22
86
Total
1069
123
67
30
1289
25
-------
FEDERAL REGISTER
NOTICES
Date/Citation/Number of
Sites
Date
October 23, 1981
115 ("Interim Priorities List")1
July 23, 1982
45 ("Expanded Eligibility List")1
December 30, 1982 (47 FR 58476)
418 (proposal of first NPL, including 153 of 160 sites
announced previously)
March 4, 1983 (48 FR 93 1 1)
1 (proposal of Times Beach, Missouri)
September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40658)
406 (promulgation of first NPL; 1 proposed site split into 2
sites; 1 site deleted; 6 proposed sites dropped; 7 sites remain
proposed)
September 8, 1983 (48 FR 40674)
133 (Proposed Rule #1)
May 8, 1984 (49 FR 19480)
4 (promulgation of 4 San Gabriel Valley Sites in California,
part of Proposed Rule #1)
September 21, 1984 (49 FR 37070)
128 (promulgation of 123 Proposed Rule #1 sites and 5 from
original proposal; 4 proposed sites dropped)
October 15, 1984 (49 FR 40320)
244, including 36 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #2)
February 14, 1985 (50 FR 6320)
2 (promulgation of Glen Ridge and Montclair/West Orange
Radium Sites in New Jersey, part of Proposed Rule #2)
April 10, 1985 (50 FR 14115)
32, including 6 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #3)
September 16, 1985 (50 FR 37630)
1 (promulgation of Lansdowne Radiation Site in Pennsylvania,
part of Proposed Rule #3)
September 18, 1985 (50 FR 37950)
41, including 3 Federal facility sites and one reproposed site
(Proposed Rule #4)
Number of Sites
Final
406
410
538
538
540
540
541
541
Proposed
115
160
418
419
140
136
4
248
246
278
277
318
Total
115
160
418
419
546
546
542
786
736
818
818
859
26
-------
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
(continued)
Date
June 10, 1986 (51 FR 21054)
170 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #1-4; 8 sites
deleted)
June 10, 1986 (51 FR 21099)
45, including 2 Federal Facility sites (Proposed Rule #5)
June 10, 1986 (5 1 FR 2 1109)
proposed RCRA policy; reopening of comment period for
5 sites
January 22, 1987 (52 FR 2492)
64, including 1 Federal facility site (Proposed Rule #6)
February 25, 1987 (52 FR 5578)
Availability of information
May 13, 1987 (52 FR 17991)
proposed RCRA policy for Federal facility sites
July 22, 1987 (52 FR 27620)
99 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-6)
July 22, 1987 (52 FR 27643)
7 (reproposal of Federal facility sites)
June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23978)
43 (reproposal of RCRA sites)
June 24, 1988 (53 FR 23988)
229, including 14 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #7)
August 9, 1988 (53 FR 30002/30005)
RCRA policy statements
March 13, 1989 (54 FR 10512)
(8 Federal facility sites)
and
March 31, 1989 (54 FR 13296)
101 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-7;
4 proposed sites dropped)
May 5, 1989 (54 FR 19526)
10 (Proposed Rule #8)
July 14, 1989 (54 FR 29820)
52 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #9
August 16, 1989 (54 FR 33846)
2 (proposal of ATSDR sites)
Number of Sites
Final
703
703
802
7993
8903
890
8S93
889
Proposed
185
2482
149
378
273
283
335
337
Total
888
951
951
1,177
1,163
1,173
1,224
1,226
27
-------
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
(continued)
Date
October 4, 1989 (54 FR 41000/41015)
93 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-8; 31
proposed sites dropped)
October 26, 1989 (54 FR 43778)
25, including 2 Federal facility sites (Proposed Rule #10, last
proposed rule under original HRS)
November 21, 1989 (54 FR 48184)
29 (promulgation of 27 Federal facility sites from Proposed Rule
#9 and 2 ATSDR sites; expansion of 1 Federal facility site)
February 21, 1990 (55 FR 6154)
71 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2-7, 9;
1 proposed site dropped)
March 14, 1990 (55 FR 9688)
1 (promulgation of United Heckathorn Co. , Richmond,
California, part of Proposed Rule #10)
August 30, 1990 (55 FR 35502)
106 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2, 5-10; 10
proposed sites dropped)
February 11, 1991 (56 FR 5598)
6 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #2, 5-7, 10;
14 proposed sites dropped) (last final rule under original HRS)
May 9, 1991 (56 FR 21460)
1 (proposal of ATSDR site)
July 29, 1991 (56 FR 35840)
22 (Proposed Rule #11, first proposed rule under revised HRS)
September 25, 1991 (56 FR 48438)
I (promulgation of ATSDR site)
February 7, 1992 (57 FR 4824)
30 (Proposed Rule #12)
October 14, 1992 (57 FR 47181)
33 (promulgation of sites from Proposed Rules #11 and 12);
first final rule under revised HRS
October 14, 1992 (57 FR 47204)
9 (Proposed Rule #13)
May 10, 1993 (58 FR 27507)
26 (Proposed Rule #14)
Number of Sites
Final
9813
981
1,010
1,081
1,082
1.1873
1.1893
1.1883
1,188
1.1853
1.1833
1,2083-4
1.2023-4
Proposed
213
238
209
137
136
20
0
1
23
22
52
28
26
Total
1,194
1,219
1,219
1,218
1,218
1,207
1,189
1,189
1,211
1,207
1,235
1,236
1,256
28
-------
FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICES
(continued)
Date
June 23, 1993 (58 FR 34018)
17 (Proposed Rule #15)
January, 1994
26 (Proposed Rule #16)
Number of Sites
Final
1.1993-4
1.1923
Proposed
17
26
Total
1,270
1,289
'No Federal Register notice.
^Silver Creek Tailings, Park City, UT, removed October 17, 1986 as required by CERCLA Section 118(p).
'Reflects site(s) deleted since last rule.
""Reflects site(s) removed since last rule.
29
-------
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
For further information, call the Superfund Hotline, toll-free
1-800-424-9346 or (703) 920-9810 in Washington, DC
metropolitan area, or the U.S. EPA Superfund Regional Offices
listed below.*
For publications, contact
Public Information Center, 3404
401 M Street, SW
Washington, DC 20460
(202) 260-2080
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, 5204G
United States Environmental Protection Agency
401 M Street SW
Washington. DC 20460
(703) 603-8860
Region 1
Connecticut
Maine
Massachusetts
New Hampshire
Rhode Island
Vermont
Waste Management Division, HAA-CAN-1
John F. Kennedy Federal Building
Boston, MA 02203-2211
(617) 573-5707
Region 2
New Jersey
New York
Puerto Rico
Virgin Islands
Emergency and Remedial Response Division
26 Federal Plaza
New York, NY 10278
(212) 264-8672
Region 3
Delaware
District of Columbia
Maryland
Pennsylvania
Virginia
West Virginia
Site Assessment Section, 3HW73
841 Chestnut Building
Philadelphia, PA 19107
(215) 597-8229
Region 4
Alabama
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
Waste' Management ^Division
345 Courtland Street NE
Atlanta, GA 30365
(404) 347-5065
Mississippi
North Carolina
South Carolina
Tennessee
Region 5
Illinois
Indiana
Michigan
Minnesota
Ohio
Wisconsin
Waste Management Division
77 West Jackson Boulevard, 6th Floor
Chicago, IL 60604
(312) 886-7570
Regions
Arkansas
Louisiana
New Mexico
Oklahoma
Texas
Hazardous Waste Management Division, 6H-M
1445 Ross Avenue
Dallas, TX 76202-2733
(214) 655-6740
Region 7
Iowa
Kansas
Missouri
Nebraska
Waste Management Division
726 Minnesota Avenue
Kansas City, KS 66101
(913) 551-7062 or 551-7595
Region 8
Colorado
Montana
North Dakota
South Dakota
Utah
.Wyoming.
Hazardous Waste Management Division, 8HWM-SR
999 18th Street, Suite 500
Denver, CO 80202-2466
(303) 294-7630
Region 9
American Samoa
Arizona
California
Guam
Hawaii
Nevada
Northern Marianas
Trust Territories
Waste Management Division, H-1
75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
(415) 744-1730
Region 10
Alaska
Idaho
Oregon
Washington
Hazardous Waste Division, HW-113
1200 6th Avenue
Seattle, WA 98101
(206) 553-1677
* All EPA telephone and telecommunications systems may be
accessed via the Federal Telecommunications System (FTS).
------- |