&EPA
             United State*
             Environmental Protection
             Agency
           Off ice of
           Solid Wane and
           Emergency Response
DIRECTIVE NUMBER:

TITLE:
9360.2-02
                   Policy on Management of Post-Removal Site
                     Control
APPROVAL DATE:  12/3/90

EFFECTIVE DATE:

ORIGINATING OFFICE:
                             12/3/90
                                 OSWER
              D DRAFT

               STATUS:



              REFERENCE (other documents):
  OSWER      OSWER      OSWER
VE   DIRECTIVE   DIRECTIVE   D

-------
Scott Maid
Mai Code
OS-210
Office '
ERD
Telepnone Code
382-7735



J  "  .J  USWfcri Directive Initiation Request
                                                                93>50-2-02
             Policy on Management of Post-Removal Site  Control
     4. Summary ol Directive (include Bn«< »iatsrn«nt of purpose)
           Transmits OSWER policy on management of post-removal siteControl for
          Fund-financed removal actions and communicating decisions to States on the
          use of institutional controls.
     3. Keywords'
           Superfund; removal; NCE; institutional controls
      S4. OCI> This Directive Supersede Previous Oireciive(s)7
      b. Oo«t B Supplement Previous 0 OSWtH 01r»etJvM System Format Standards.
9. Signature ol teed Office Directives Coordinator
Betti C. VanEpps, Superfund Documents coordinator
Don Clay, Assistant Administrator^ OSWER
Date
n— n — /j
'- '- j O
Oete
•- ' ~ *D
V,'
     EPA form Ut«-i7 (Rev. t-47) Previous editions are obsolete.
  OSWER         OSWER              OSWER             O
VE     DIRECTIVE        DIRECTIVE       DIRECTIVE

-------
            UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                       WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
                           TEC  3
                                            SOLID WASTE AMD EMERGENCY RESPONSE
MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT:  Policy on Management of Post-Removal Site Control
          (OSWER Directive  9360.2-02)
FROM:     Don R. Clay
          Assistant Administrat

TO:       Regional Administrators,  Regions I-X
          Directors, Waste Management Division
            Regions I,  IV, V,  VII,  VIII
          Directors, Hazardous Waste Management Division
            Regions III, VI
          Director, Emergency  and Remedial Response Division
            Region II
          Director, Toxics and Waste Management Division
            Region IX
          Director, Hazardous  Waste Division,  Region X
          Directors, Environmental  Services Division
            Regions I,  VI, VII
Purpose

     This memorandum transmits  the Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response  (OSWER)  policy on management of post-removal
site control for Fund-financed  removal activities and
communicating decisions to  States on the use of institutional
controls.
     OSWZR~is concerned  that the Superfund removal program has
become increasingly  involved with protracted and costly site
control activities following. mJ.tigatJLon_of_a_ release or threat of
release of a hazardous substance or pollutant or contaminant.
These response activities  are more appropriately conducted by the
affected State,  local unit of government,  potentially responsible
party (PRP) , or,  in  some cases,  by the Superfund reme.di.al.  ....
program.                          .
                                                          Pruiltd «* Kteycl*4 Paptr

-------
                                    OSWER Directive No.'9360\2-02
Objective
     This memorandum provides procedures to ensure that, when
necessary and to the extent practicable, provision for post-
removal site control at both National Priorities List (NPL) and
non-NPL sites is made prior to initiation of a Fund-financed
removal action.  Procedures are also provided for communicating
decisions to States on the use of institutional controls when
waste is left on site following a removal action.


Implementation

     Prior to the initiation of Fund-financed removal activities
at a site, provision for conduct of post-removal site control may
be made with:

     1)   The affected State or local unit of government for any
          removal; or

     2)   A PRP; or

     3)   EPA's remedial program for eligible responses at an NPL
          site.

     EPA must also inform States of any decision or recommen-
dation concerning the use of institutional controls following
removal actions where waste is left oh site.  No State commitment
for institutional controls is required prior to the initiation of
Fund-financed removal activities.
Definitions

     "Post-removal site control" refers to those response
activities that are necessary to sustain the integrity of a Fund-
financed removal action following its conclusion.  Post-removal
site control activities, such as relighting gas flares, replacing
filters, and collecting leachate are necessary for assuring the
continuing effectiveness of a removal action after the completion
of the Fund-financed removal activities.   Post-removal site
control continues until such time as:
     1Note that these "post-removal site .controls" may themselves
     be "removal" or "remedial" actions within the meaning of
     CERCLA §§101(23) and 101(24).

-------
                                    OSWER Directive No. 9360.2-02

     1)   A PRP, a unit of State or local government, or the
          remedial program implements a permanent remedy; or

     2)   No further site control is necessary.

     "Institutional controls" generally limit human activities at
or near facilities where hazardous substances, pollutants, or
contaminants exist or will remain on-site.  Examples of
institutional controls include land and resource (e.g., water)
use and deed restrictions, well-drilling prohibitions, building
permits, and well use advisories and deed notices.


State or PRP Commitment for Post-Removal Site Control

     Before commencing a Fund-financed removal action where post-
removal site control is anticipated, the Region should obtain a
commitment from the State, local government, or PRP agreeing to
perform and fund the actions necessary to sustain the integrity
of the removal action.  Attachment 1 describes the procedures for
obtaining a commitment from State or local governments for post-
removal site control.  For classic emergencies and some time-
critical responses, the commitment may be obtained after
initiation of urgent removal actions rather than risk delaying a
response.

     Post-removal site control may be considered part of a
remedial action at a site.  Therefore, where a State incurs post-
removal site control expenditures for eligible response
activities implemented since the passage of SARA (October 17,
1986) at a site that is currently or eventually listed on the
NPL, the State may submit a claim for credit under section
104(c)(5)(B) of CERCLA.  Attachment 2 provides information on the
requirements for CERCLA credits and how they apply to post-
removal site control expenditures.  Attachment 3 describes how to
obtain CERCLA credits.

     The Regions may secure post-removal site control from a PRP
by using a consent order or unilateral administrative order
(UAO).   Th« exact controls should be described in the order and
it should be clear that the post-removal site controls are an
enforceable part of the order. . Although a UAO does not involve a
commitment from the PRP, in most cases, a UAO will provide EPA
with a mechanism for ensuring that post-removal site control will
be performed.  In any event, the Region must include in the site
enforcement strategy a contingent approach if the PRPs do not
comply with the UAO.

-------
                                    OSWER Directive No. 9360.2-02

Remedial Program Option for Post-Removal site Control

     In special circumstances, EPA's remedial program may assume
responsibility for post-removal site control at an NPL site when
the site control measures support, or are a part of, the final
remedial action to be taken at a site.  The remedial program may
assume responsibility for post-removal site control as part of
the temporary source control measures to be incorporated into an
interim action, when such action is warranted.  Under this
arrangement, the Remedial Project Manager (RPM) will negotiate a
Superfund State Contract (SSC) or Cooperative Agreement with the
State for cost share and future operation and maintenance (O&M)
commitments for the remedial action.  See OSWER Directive
9355.3-02, "Interim Final Guidance on Preparing Superfund
Decision Documents:  the Proposed Plan, the Record.of Decision,
Explanation of Significant Differences, and the Record of
Decision Amendment" (November 1989) for further guidance on
interim actions and when they may be appropriate.


Where Mo commitment for Post-Removal site Control is Reached

     At a site where no private or governmental entity is willing
or able to assume responsibility for post-removal site control,
EPA should avoid taking any action that requires continuing site
control activities if other reasonable response options exist.
Where there are no other options, EPA will respond only to the
initial threat, ensuring that the emergency created by the
release or threat of release has been mitigated.


Institutional Controls

     EPA must inform States of any decision or recommendation
concerning the use of institutional controls following removal
actions where waste is left on site.  This information must be
included in EPA's post-removal site control notification letter
to the affected State.  A model notification letter is provided
in Attachment 4.


For More Information

     If there are questions or comments on this policy, please
contact Elizabeth Zeller of the Emergency Response Division at
FTS 382-7735.

-------
                                    OSWER Directive No. 9360.2-02
Attachments
cc:  superfund Branch Chiefs, Regions I-X
     OHM Coordinators, Regions I-X
     Henry Longest II
     Bruce Diamond
     Timothy Fields, Jr.
     Stephen Luftig
     Paul Nadeau
     Clem Rastatter
     Larry Reed
     Earl Salo
     Howard Corcoran
     John Riley
     Elizabeth Zeller
     Betti VanEpps

-------
ATTACHMENT 1.  Procedures For Obtaining Post-Removal Site Control Commitment
                   From State/Local Government
     REGION
Identify post-removal
site control requirements,
cost, and duration.
 Send notification
 letter to the State.
 Send letter of
 commitment to EPA.
                               See Attachment 4 for sample notification letter
See Attachment 5 for sample State commitment letter.

Note: If the State intends that a local government will assume
responsibility for post-removal site control, the State, local
government, and EPA should document that decision in
correspondence. In these cases, the local government may
prepare and submit the letter of commitment* The State must
also provide assurances under CERCLA section 104 in a
Superfund State Contract (SSC) before a local government
may take the lead for any phase of a remedial response (see
Attachment 6 for SSC clauses).
     States may not claim credit for expenditures by local governments. A pass-through of funds
     from States to local governments is, however, acceptable. See Attachment 2 for additional
     eligibility requirements for obtaining CERCLA credit.

-------
ATTACHMENT 2.  Eligibility Requirements for Obtaining CERCLA
                      Credits for Post-Removal Site Control Activities
                                         Is the site listed
                                           on ihe NPL?
                                           ere expenses
                                        incurred between
                                       January 1,1978 and
                                     December 11,1980. or
                                        after October 17.
                                             1986?
                                         Are expenses
                                     reasonable, documen
                                     and direct out-of-pocket
                                        expenditures of
                                          non-Federal
                                            funds?
                                             Have
                                       expenditures been
                                    reimbursed previously by
                                    the Federal government or
                                         another entity?
                                         Were expenses
                                        incurred by other
                                      entities, such as local
                                      units of government?
               Post-removal site control expenses incurred by the State until a permanent
                       remedy is implemented are eligible for CERCLA credit.
 The State may not claim
 credit for post-removal site
 control at a site that is not
 ultimately listed on the
 NPL.
The State may only claim
credit for expenditures for
activities implemented
during these time periods.
The State is not eligible for
CERCLA credits for
expenses that do not meet
these criteria.
The State is not eligible for
credit for expenses for
which they have already
been reimbursed.
The State is not eligible for
credit for expenses incurred by
other entities.
Note: A pass-through of funds
from States to local
governments is acceptable and
should be negotiated
independently between
the Slate and local government.

-------
                                                                         Credits
         Document pre- and post-
         removal expenditures in
         the response agreement.
                           A Cooperative Agreement or a Superfund State Contract (SSC)
                           is required before remedial activities commence at an NPL site, or
                           at the time a site is ultimately listed on the NPL.
        Document post-removal
        site control activities in a
        Statement of Work
        (SOW) and the response
        agreement.
                           The SOW should include sufficient detail to facilitate both
                           technical and financial review.

                           If changes in the SOW are needed, an amendment should be made
                           to the appropriate response agreement tor preserve the State's credit.
        Claim credit on a site-
        specific basis and apply
        credit first to off-set cost
        share at the site where it
        was originally earned.
                           If the amount of credit is insufficient to meet the State's cost-share
                           requirement, the State is responsible for providing the remainder of
                           the cost-share in cash or services.
        If the following conditions apply:
Ongoing activity
at NPL sites:
Excess credit exists:
Selected remedy is a
"no action" alternative:
Responsible party lakes
lead for remedial action:
 The State may continue to
 claim credit as amend-
 ments are made to the
 Cooperative Agreement
 or SSC.

 The State may continue to
 claim credit as additional
 obligations are made to the
 State for remedial response.
 The State may use excess
 credit earned at one NPL
 site to offset its cost share
 at another NPL site (upon
 EPA approval).  Excess
 credit is not reimbursable.
 State work at a non-NPL
 site cannot be credited
 unless the site becomes
 listed on the NPL
  Credit may not be received
  for post-removal site
  control expenses after a "no
  action" alternative is
  selected and the Record of
  Decision is signed.
 EPA will negotiate with
 the responsible party to
 ensure payment for the
 post- removal site control
 (if the responsible party is
 not willing to assume these
 costs, the State can claim
 credit as shown above).

-------
                                    OSWER Directive No. 9360.2-02

                           Attachment  4

                  SAMPLE EPA NOTIFICATION LETTER
Name of State
State Hazardous Waste Management Official
Address

Dear    :

     As discussed in a conversation on rdatel between the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the State of rnamel,
EPA is planning to initiate (or has initiated) a Fund-financed
removal action at the (site name! site pursuant to section 104 of
the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act of 1980, as amended (CERCLA).  To ensure the
continuing effectiveness of the removal action, post-removal site
control and institutional control activities are necessary.

     The purpose of this letter is to request that the State of
[name1 provide EPA with a written commitment that the State will
assume responsibility for all post-removal site control
activities at the Fsite name] site until such time as a permanent
remedy is implemented or until no further site control is needed.
EPA would also like to use this opportunity to inform the State
of [name] about the use of institutional controls at Fsite name]
site.                                      .  _

     Removal activities planned (or being conducted) by EPA at
the site include:  riist].  EPA expects that the Fund-financed
removal action will be complete on rdatel, at which time post-
removal site control and institutional control activities must
commence.

     At this time, EPA anticipates the need for the State to
conduct the following post-removal site control activities:
[list!.  EPA also anticipates the need for implementation of the
following institutional controls:  [list].  These and any other
actions necessary to ensure the effectiveness of the removal
action ar« considered essential post-removal site control
activities.

     Post-removal site control is considered to be part of the
remedial action at sites that are currently or eventually listed
on the National Priorities List (NPL).  Therefore, the State may
claim credit for all post-removal site control activities imple-
mented subsequent to the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization
Act of 1986 (October 17, 1986).  Please note that to claim credit
for direct, out-of-pocket post-removal site control expenditures

-------
                                    OSWER Directive No. . 9360-.2-02

incurred by the State, a Superfund Cooperative Agreement or
Superfund State Contract must be in place.  AH CERCLA credits
are subject to verification in an audit conducted by the EPA
Office of the Inspector General.  Letters from the State to EPA
assuming responsibility for post-removal site control are not
appropriate vehicles for documenting expenditures and do not
replace the statutory requirements for a Cooperative Agreement or
Superfund State Contract for the purpose of applying a credit to
offset the cost of remedial action at an NPL site.

     Regulatory requirements for post-removal site control are
contained at 40 CFR Part 300 (the National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency Plan).  [The regulations and
procedures to obtain credit are specified at 40 CFR Part 35,
Subpart O (Final Rule for Cooperative Agreements and Superfund
State Contracts for Superfund Response Actions).]  You may obtain
EPA guidance on post-removal site control and institutional
controls from [contact, phone number].  Please provide your post-
removal site control commitment for this site to fname].  Regional
Administrator, by [date].  If you have questions regarding these
issues, please direct your inquiries to fcontact; phone number!.-


                                   Sincerely,


                                   fNamel
                                   Superfund Branch Chief
                                   Region rNumber1


cc:  Region rnumber! Coordinator, ERD (OS-210)

     (Add all appropriate recipients)
                                10

-------
                                    OSWER Directive No. 9360.2-02

                           Attachment 5


                  SAMPLE STATE COMMITMENT LETTER
Name
Regional Administrator
Region [Njjm&firJ
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Address

Dear    :

     In response to your letter of [data], the State of fnamel
understands that Superfund monies are being used to perform
removal activities at fsite name! pursuant to section 104 of the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act of 1980, as amended (CERCLA), and that post-removal site
control will be necessary to ensure the continuing effectiveness
of the Fund-financed removal action.  The State of [name] commits
to assume responsibility for post-removal site control activities
at the rsite name") hazardous waste site until such time as a
permanent remedy is implemented or until no further site control
is needed.

     It is expected that Fund-financed removal activities
conducted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will
cease on rdatel, at which time the State will commence post-
removal site control.  The State acknowledges that the following
post-removal site control activities may be required:  [list].
The State commits to conduct these and any other actions
necessary to ensure the effectiveness of the removal actions.

     The State understands that it may claim a credit for direct,
out-of-pocket expenditures of non-Federal funds associated with
post-removal site control at the Fsite name] hazardous waste site
if this sit* is currently or eventually listed on the National
Priorities List (NPL).  The State also acknowledges that there
must be a stapsrfund Cooperative Agreement or Superfund State
Contract iaplace prior to claiming a credit for State
expenditure* associated with these activities and assumes
responsibility: for initiating an appropriate response agreement.
                                11

-------
                                    OSWER Directive No. 9.360.2-02
     If questions arise pertaining to post-removal site control
activities at the ("site namel in the future, please direct your
inquiries to [contact, phone number!.
                             Sincerely,
                             rNamel
                             Hazardous Waste Management Official
cc:  Super fund Branch Chief, Region [
     (Add all appropriate recipients)
                                12

-------
                                     OSWER Directive No.  9360.2-02

                            Attachment 6

                 SUPERFUND STATE CONTRACT CLAUSES
              SPECIFIC  TO  POST-REMOVAL SITE CONTROL


     A Superfund state  Contract (SSC)  is a legally binding and
enforceable document that  details  a State's compliance with
statutory and regulatory requirements  for Superfund responses,
that ensures State  involvement  under section 121 of CERCLA, and
that provides the necessary  assurances required under CERCLA
section 104 when either EPA  or  a political subdivision assumes
lead responsibility for performing a Fund-financed response.  The
SSC includes post-removal 'site  control,  where applicable,  and --
sample clauses containing  standard language concerning post-
removal site control are provided  below.

Contents of an SSC

     For all SSCs involving post-removal site control, include this clause:

     This is an agreement  between  the  U.S.  Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) and  the State  of ("name) to conduct post-
removal site control including  the following activities  [type of
activities! to be undertaken at [site  name],  to satisfy  the
requirements of the Comprehensive  Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability  Act of 1980,  as amended (CERCLA), and
all applicable regulations.  .The Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and  Liability  Information System
(CERCLIS) identification code for  this site is [number].  This
Contract covers only those activities  described in the Statement
of Work (SOW) attached  hereto and  incorporated herein as Appendix
[_].  This Contract may be amended if  the parties agree  to under-
take additional remedial activities beyond the SOW.

c'nmni'i.tmant to Perform Post—Removal Site Control

     For all SSCs involving post-removal site control, include this clause:

     The State fnamel agrees to implement all future post-removal
site control activities required at the site provided for under
this Contract for the expected  life of such actions.  EPA will
ensure that.the State is adequately.informed of progress during
     2 All clauses must comply with EPA's Final Rule on
      Cooperative Agreements  and Superfund  State Contracts for
      .Superfund Response Actions at  40 CFR  Part 35,  Subpart 0
      (54 Federal Register  22994,  June 5, 1990).

                                 13

-------
                                     OSWER Directive No.  9360/2-02

removal actions and of requirements  for  implementing post-removal
site control.

Cost-share

     The following clause3 should be used to document State cost-share:

     Sections 104(c)(3) and  104(d)(l) of CERCLA,  as amended,
require that EPA determine whether the Site was publicly or
privately operated at the time of the release,  in order  to
determine the State's cost-share.  This  Site was  [CHOOSE]
(publicly)  (privately) operated; therefore, the state's  cost-
share is (CHOOSE] (10) (50)  percent.  The estimated cost of the
remedial action (excluding EPA's indirect costs)  is [$	].   This
estimate is derived from the [CHOOSE source]  {costs itemized in
the SOW) (Record Of Decision)  (design specifications) and
includes contingencies for change orders,  which may or may not be
invoked, and construction management services.

State CERCIA Credit

     The following sample clause4 should be used fo document applicable CERCLA
credits:

     CERCLA credit may be applied to offset the State's  cost-
share requirements of this contract, including provisions for
post-removal site control.   The State [CHOOSE]  (declares)  (does
not declare) credit for costs incurred at the Site.   [Include the
following, as appropriate:]   Credits are limited  to site-specific
expenses that EPA determines to be reasonable, documented,
direct, out-of-pocket expenditures of non-Federal funds  that have
not been previously applied  or reimbursed.   [CAVEAT:  States may
not transfer remaining credits from  another site,  unless EPA
gives prior, written approval.  Call EPA Headquarters—Superfund
State Involvement Section—for assistance.]

     The State declares that it has  a CERCLA credit of  [$	] for
costs incurred at this Site,  satisfying  [cite applicable
requirement* in 40 CFR 35.6285(c)(1)].   Technical and financial
documentation to  support this credit declaration  may be  examined
      The language of these clauses is taken directly from the
      document "Classic Two-Party  Superfund  State  Contract  (SSC)
      Model Clauses," Version  1.0, August  1990.
     4 See footnote 3.
                                14

-------
                                     OSWER Directive No.  9360..2-02

 to verify the credit,  pursuant to 40 CFR 35.6285(c)(2)(i).   This
 documentation is available for inspection at [specify  state
 location].   In the event that verification reveals  less  than
 [$	]  in available credit,  then the State shall  pay the
 difference and document such in this Contract.  Excess credit
 will not be reimbursed, but with EPA approval,  excess  credit may
•be applied to another site.

      [If the State has incurred costs pursuant  to a Cooperative..
 Agreement or Superfund State Contract for either  remedial
 planning activities before 1984,  or advance match prior  to
 October 17, 1986,  pursuant to 40 CFR 35.6285(f),  then  include
 these costs in this section to off-set State's  cost-share
 requirement,  and enumerate such agreements under  List  of Site-
 Specific Agreements section of the SSC for the  site.]

      The State [CHOOSE] (has)  (has not)  entered into a
 Cooperative Agreement before incurring costs at the Site.   [If a
 CA was  entered into prior to costs incurred,  then include the
 following:]  EPA has authorized the State to incur  costs for the
 remedial action expenditures after the Site is  listed  on the NPL
 and after October 17,  1986,  to obtain credit, which is accepted
 at face value,  until verified by audit and technical review  of
 the activities undertaken at the [CHOOSE Scope  of Inspection]
 (Site)  (operable units).   [Reference CA/SSC in  List of Site-
 Specific Agreements section of the SSC for the  site.]

-------
 1  AGENCY USŁ
                           2. REPORT DATE
REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
     Policy on Management of Post-Removal Site Control
     (OSWER Directive  9360.2-02)
6 AUTHOR^.

     Scott Maid, OERR/ERD,  382-4671
                                                               s. FUNDING NUMBERS
7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)

    Environmental  Protection Agency
    Office of  Solid Waste and Emergency Response
    401 M  Street SW
    Washington, D.C.  20460
               PERFORMING ORGANIZATION
               REPORT NUMBER
9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) ANO ADDRESS(ES)

     Environmental  Protection Agency
    Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
    401 M  Street  SW
    Washington D.C.   20460
             tO. SPONSORING MONITORING
               AGENCY REPORT-NUMBf*-
11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
\2t. DISTRIBUTION  AVAILAB;L:TY STATEMENT
                                                               120. DISTRIBUTION CUJt
13. ABSTRACT I
    Prior  to the initiation  of  removal actions under  the  Comprehensive
    Environmental Response,  Compensation, and Liability Act,  as amended
     (CERCLA),  provisions should be made for post-removal  site control.
    Post-removal site control comprises those response activities that are
    necessary  to sustain the integrity of a Fund-financed removal action
    following  its conclusion.   This guidance document (OSWER  Directive
    9360.2-02)  provides procedures to ensure that, when necessary and to
    the  extent practicable,  provision is made for post-removal site control
    at all sites where Fund-financed removal actions  are  conducted.  The
    guidance also discusses  State  CERCLA credit procedures.
u. SUBJECT TERMS
•
17. SECUR'T* CLASSlflCA7:CN
OF REPORT
18 SECURITY CLASSIFICATION
OF THIS PAGE
19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION
OF ABSTRACT

16. PRICE COOt

\v.

-------
                                                             13  1990
ouper fi.i
                          r.- i.  <;
is  ,.:•.;:? IT - 1 =:   : c- . i r. f
3  u->.':c1  i  fi   0 >. reT. 1 1
 Si'c  '". o r. '. r o I ,  ci
                                      ^t  M':e  •*«".j.:3i«x-i!
                                     • ']';'. ,  F'o'^i:v  «''•'»
                                        itor-i-j  jt  :t-if;
                                                                          -,,-r   "h-f?
                                                               ' • • i 1 -.Hi i ;•• 4  i • :• -~a •.'• <::
>- i. ^r*'--r .1 -,1  151: *. r; I ?.?'
l-Jij-j.'  r! ! L t_.-i :'i  }i<3P1X i T. ,
-;.T'.->u  ilva•:•-1.  Ue - i  Hi i>i"tj
:j^thft5(jfi,  JIG   iMJfil n-^-JS
?h:.-,n<«  ^Oi '-  (^1
                                                      LSD

-------