cycling
     and control


          of metals

   U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
          NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL
             RESEARCH CENTER
               Cincinnati, Ohio

-------
CYCLING and
CONTROL of METALS
PROCEEDINGS OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL
RESOURCES CONFERENCE
SPONSORED BY:

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
National Science Foundation
Columbus Laboratories of
    Battelle Memorial Institute
October 31 - November 2, 1972
Columbus, Ohio
Compilers:
Marion G. Curry
Gilbert M. Gigliotti
National Environmental Research Center, Cincinnati
February 1973

-------
                PREFACE
  This volume is based on a conference held October 31
through November 2, 1972,in Columbus, Ohio. Each of
the five sessions of the conference was designed to bring
together knowledge and thinking in areas bearing on the
problem of metals and their relationship to the environ-
ment.
  Considering the  sources of tracer  metals in the envi-
ronment  was only  part of  the story.  Transport and
effects, control  processes, monitoring for trace metals,
and the economic and legal  aspects of  pollution were
also discussed.
  The conference was sponsored by the U. S. Environ-
mental  Protection   Agency's  National  Environmental
Research Center, Cincinnati,  National Science Founda-
tion,  and  the Columbus  Laboratories  of  Battelle
Memorial Institute.
  We  wish to express our gratitude to the many  who
contributed to the success of the Conference.
  Publication of the  papers by the U. S. Environmental
Protection Agency does not imply endorsement of either
the conclusions or any commercial product mentioned in
the papers.
                                     The Chairmen
                       ui

-------
            CONFERENCE COMMITTEE
                           Co-Chairmen
A. W. Breidenbach             C.J.Lyons                R.Rabin
National Environmental         Battelle-Columbus           National Science
Research Center USEPA         Laboratories               Foundation
                        Planning Committee
 National Environmental                                 Battelle-Columbus
 Research Center, USEPA                                Laboratories
 J. J. Convery                                         G. A. Lutz
 L. J. McCabe                                         D. L. Morrison
 I. Wilder                                            R. G. Smithson, Jr.
                                IV

-------
                                    CONTENTS
KEYNOTE REMARKS
Metals: Parts and the Whole               ....                 .  .                   .1
  A. W. Breidenbach, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
SESSION I: SOURCE OF TRACE METALS IN THE ENVIRONMENT
  Chairman: A. W. Breidenbach, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Natural Sources of Some Trace Elements in the Environment	          3
  M. Fleischer, U. S. Geological Survey
The Lead Industry as a Source of Trace Metals in the Environment    	           11
  B. G. Wixson, E. Bolter, N. L. Gale, J. C. Jennett, and K. Purushothaman, University of Missouri
Sources of Trace Metals From Highly Urbanized Southern California to the Adjacent Marine Ecosystem  21
  D. R. Young, C-S. Young, and G. E. Hlavka, Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
LUNCHEON ADDRESS
Overview of Effects of Trace Metals             .                                             41
  H. A. Laitinen, University of Illinois
SESSION n: TRANSPORT AND EFFECTS
  Chairman: H. Wiser, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Physical Transport of Trace Metals in the Lake Washington Watershed                 ...    45
  R. S. Barnes and W. R. Schell, University of Washington
Biological Uptake and Distribution of Lead in Animals    	      ....  55
  J. Abdelnour, University of Illinois
PANEL DISCUSSION: EFFECTS AND ESTABLISHMENT OF CRITERIA
Effects and Development of Criteria and the Establishment of Standards                           61
  H. Wiser, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Effects and Establishment of Criteria   ....      .    .      	         .    63
  T. E. Larson, Illinois State Water Survey
Human Studies Laboratory    	         	             67
  G. J. Love, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Significant Effect of Pollutants    	                   ...        .           69
  J. F. Cole, International Lead Zinc Research Organization, Inc.
Statement on Establishment of Criteria for Metals in Foods    	               71
  C. F. Jelinek, U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare

-------
Biomedical Research in Support of Criteria and Standards   .  .                                    73
  D. H. K. Lee, U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
SESSION HI: CONTROL PROCESSES
  Chairman: C. J. Lyons, Battelle's Columbus Laboratories
Trace Metals in Effluents From Metallurgical Operations        	                    75
  J. B. Hallowell, R. H. Cherry, Jr., and G. R. Smithson, Jr., Battelle's Columbus Laboratories
Pollution Abatement in the Metal Finishing Industry                .  .           .  .              83
  J. Ciancia, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Control and Prevention of Mine Drainage                          .                             91
  R. D. Hill, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Control of Particulate Lead Emissions From Automobiles   ...                    95
  E. N. Cantwell, E. S. Jacobs, W. G. Kunz, Jr., and V. E. Liberi, E. I. duPont deNemours & Co.
Trace Element Emissions From the Combustion of Fossil Fuels                .  .                 109
  J. R. Fancher,  Commonwealth Edison Co.
LUNCHEON ADDRESS
Luncheon Remarks.             .                                          .                 115
  Martin Lang, City of New York
SESSION IV: MONITORING FOR TRACE METALS IN THE ENVIRONMENT
  Chairman: R. Rabin, National Science Foundation
Monitoring Session: Chairman's Opening Remarks       ....                        .121
  R. Rabin, National Science Foundation
Monitoring for Trace Metals in the Atmospheric Environment: Problems and Needs       .          123
  P. R. Harrison, Department of Environmental Control
Monitoring for Trace Metals—Water Environment      .      .  .    .           	      145
  D. G. Ballinger, U. S. National Environmental Research Center
Monitoring of Solid Wastes     ......                      .               .149
  E. A. Glysson, University of Michigan
Monitoring for Trace Metals in Food    .    .         ...       .      .  .                     153
  E. 0. Haenni, U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
Dimensions of Monitoring    ...                                           159
  R. P. Ouellette and J. W. Overbey II, The MITRE Corp.
SESSION V:  ECONOMIC AND LEGAL ASPECTS
  Chairman: G. Strasser, Battelle's Columbus Laboratories
Economic and Legal Aspects                                                                 167
  G. Strasser, Battelle's Columbus Laboratories
The Social Implication of Controls                                                            169
  P. Mickey, Concern, Inc.
How Much Recycling Is Enough?                                                             173
  T. Page, Resources for the Future, Inc.
Law and Trace Metals                                                                       179
  E. F. Murphy,  Ohio State University

-------
KEYNOTE REMARKS
                  A. W. Breidenbach
                  U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

-------
                                 KEYNOTE  REMARKS
                     METALS:  PARTS AND  THE WHOLE
                                        A. W.BREIDENBACH
                                U. S.  Environmental Protection Agency
                                            Cincinnati, Ohio
 INTRODUCTION
  For  a  few short hours we have come together this
 week  to  look  at  the subject  of metals and  their
 relationship to  the  environment.  Metals are  an apt
 subject since they claim the attention of the chemist,
 physicist,  engineer,  biologist,  physician, statistician,
 mathematician,  economist, and  politician. They  also
 pervade  the  air, the  water,  and  the  land. Their
 deficiencies and overabundances are important to plants,
 animals, and most importantly, man.
  Metals are elements that have a typical luster and that
 carry a positive charge. The electrolytic chemist defines
 metals as  those substances  that are liberated at the
 cathode. The mining engineer will  think of extractable
 ores;  the  civil  engineer  of  structural  steel.  Other
 recognizable  characteristics of  metals  are their high
 melting  temperatures,  low  specific  heat, good
 themoelectrical conductivity, hardness, and inability to
 be deformed permanently without fracture.
  Metals and alloys representing mixtures of metals are
 identified and classified by their chemical, physical, and
 mechanical properties. Some combination of these three
 properties  usually  determines the metal chosen for  a
 specific function. Strength,  malleability, and resistance
 to corrosion are important  characteristics of metals in
 engineering and physical arenas. We all know that gold,
 silver,  platinum, bronze, brass, copper, aluminum,  and
 stainless  steel  have  utility,  in  addition to  certain
 aesthetic values we appreciate.
  We find  that the entire plant  and animal kingdoms
 depend on metals in a variety of ways. For example, the
 blood that flows through our circulation system carrying
 oxygen to our cells and  removing the waste  carbon
 dioxide depends heavily on an atom of iron incorporated
 into  the hemoglobin of the red corpusle. Textbooks on
 biochemistry or physiology  relate that a large group of
 metals  are  active  within  the  dynamics  of  protein
anabolism  and  catabolism. Iron,  cobalt,  manganese,
copper, and magnesium and  many other metals  are
essential  to  the  structure of  metalo-proteins.  More
specifically,  the  enzymes  that  catalyze various
biochemical reactions within plant and animal systems
are often either activated by metals or contain metal.
  Although plants and animals need metals, they don't
need  too much of them.  For instance, some scholars
implicate an  overabundance  of lead in the fall of the
Roman Empire. The eastern Romans used leaden pots to
contain their wine, and they reduced the acidity of wine
by  adding  lead oxide to  it.  The lead poisoning that
followed  brought   about   widespread  stillbirths,
deformities, and brain damage, particularly among the
upper classes who obviously  had greater access to lead
vessels — and to the wine. Some support for this theory
comes from the high  lead content found in the bones of
some  ancient  Romans.  Such  accounts,  even if
speculative, give us some concern over the level of blood
lead in the earth's human  population, which  presently
lies between  0.05 and 0.4 parts per million,  averaging
about 0.25 parts per  million. Recent proposals indicate
that the toxic threshold level of lead in the blood should
be  reduced from  0.8 to  0.5 ppm for  classical lead
poisoning. Despite increased environmental levels, the
decrease  from earlier high levels is probably resulting
from the greater precautions in the use of lead.
  Metal  deficiencies result  in illnesses. In the same way
that an  overabundant intake  of metal results in toxic
reactions.  The  various  forms of life on the planet
obviously  require  a variety  of  metals  in various
concentrations. We all know now that trace elements are
needed in our diets and that we feed our lawns 10 parts
of nitrogen, 10 parts of phosphorus, and  10 parts of
potassium in the spring. Controlling the intake of metal
in our food and  water  as well as  its intake  by other
animals and plants in the ecological system becomes an
important environmental responsibility.
  Most of the  metal  that we use as inhabitants of the
earth  comes from the  crust  of the earth. The  most
important elements, which accounts for about 90% of all

-------
            CYCLING AND CON7TROL OF METALS
the metal used, is iron. The most abundant, accounting
for 28%,  is silica. AJthough  many metals  exist in the
earth's crust at quantities of less than one thousandth of
a  percent, a plentiful supply is  related to  much of
today's pollution. The  excess  or overabundance that
causes toxicity in man and animals can be the cause of
pollution  on the earth, since  abundances, somehow,
encourage wastage.
  The processes, coflectively  known as mining, that
remove metals from the earth's crust, cause the influx of
heavy metals, acid,  sediment, and mineralized water,
which  degraded   over  10,000  miles of  streams.
Approximately 45  million acres are disturbed yearly
and this  number is expected to increase because of the
increasing demand for power and metals. After the ore is
removed,  it must be processed and refined so that the
purer form of the  metal  can  ultimately  be used to
fabricate needed  objects and structures. Although the
processing and refining operations for the various metals
differ  widely,  these processes  have,  in the  past,
contributed greatly to our air pollution, water pollution,
and our solid waste problems.
  Contrary  to popular  opinion,  concern about  the
environment has been with us for over six decades. The
Federal Government's role in stream pollution control
began in 1913 on the northern bank of the Ohio River at
Cincinnati. The substantive legislation that implemented
broad  water pollution control programs was  enacted.
almost three decades ago, in  1946. Air pollution work
began in the 50's. The problems of the management and
utilization of wasted  solids, which came to the forefront
in the 1960's, are  present with  us in  the  70's and
promise to claim our attention in the 80's and 90's.
  There are certain comfortable personal advantages for
the  scientist conducting  research within  the  various
environmental  compartments. Research confined to a
narrow avenue can produce sound defensible data, which
we need. But this kind of research alone, multiplied by
the many scientists who pursue it, may never give us the
holistic view of the environment we need to make true
progress. I am now convinced that these compartments,
air, water, solid waste, pesticide, radiation, noise, etc.,
cannot be considered independently of one another. The
interrelationships  between  various  environmental
segments  must  receive paramount  consideration,  not
only at the  level of the research administrator but also
by the scientists who conduct  research and  exchange
information in conferences. Man does not live  only on a
river or  only in  the  air.  He is not exposed just  to
radiation  or just  to  pesticides.  Environmental insults
occur through all routes: air, water, and food.  Man sees
it, hears it,  feels it, tastes it,and smells it. He inhales it,
ingests it, and exposes his skin and mucous membranes
to it. He works in it, plays in it, and sleeps in it.
   Our task  is  certainly  cut out  for  us.  We  have a
storehouse of metals  present  in the earth and available
for our use for centuries  to come. We must  develop a
stewardship in the use of these resources that avoids the
difficulties of high and low exposures to life forms and
encourages  reclaimation, re-use,  and recycling for the
ultimate benefit of other generations yet to live on this
planet. We must be cautious about  the manner in which
we mine,  process, fabricate, use,  and  discard these
materials. We need a  positive plan  that will permit the
maximum advantage to mankind in the re-use of metallic
resources.
  Perhaps here in Columbus, we as scientists interested in
particular impacts of metals can begin  to  build a total
solution  to  an  environmental problem from our
individual data, information, and experience.

-------
          SESSION I
SOURCE  OF TRACE METALS
   IN THE ENVIRONMENT
                  Chairman:

                  A. W. Breidenbach
                  U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

-------
     NATURAL  SOURCES  OF  SOME TRACE  ELEMENTS
                              IN  THE  ENVIRONMENT
                                           M. FLEISCHER
                                        U. S. Geological Survey
                                           Washington, D.  C.
INTRODUCTION
  Increasing  concern  over  possible hazards to health
caused by trace metals, has led to the realization that we
need to know much more about their natural and man
made sources, their transport under natural conditions,
and their entire cycle in the lithosphere, hydrosphere,
biosphere,  and  atmosphere. Since it  is necessary to
restrict  the discussion,  data are   presented  for  four
elements: lead, cadmium, arsenic,  and  mercury, in the
commonest types of rocks. Emphasis is placed on rocks
in which these  elements have  been concentrated  and
rocks that are treated by man in ways that the elements
might enter the environment in amounts sufficient to
affect health.
  Average  concentrations of  these elements  in  the
continental crust, such as those listed  in the tables of
this  paper, represent  material  generally estimated to
consist of about 95%  igneous and metamorphic rocks,
and about 5% of sedimentary rocks. Detailed estimates
of the proportions of  various  types  of  igneous  and
sedimentary rocks  have been  reviewed  (1 3).   The
distribution  patterns  of  trace elements  have been
reviewed in several papers in a recent monograph (4).
  Igneous rocks, formed by the solidification of melts,
constitute  most  of the continental crust,  which is
generally considered to be composed mainly of a 2  to 1
ratio of silicic  types and  basaltic types. The silicic types
include the granites and granodiorites that form large
plutons  such as  those  of the Sierra Nevada and Idaho
batholiths,  and also the extrusive  rhyolites. Rocks of
basaltic type which form the large-scale lava flows of the
Columbia and  Snake  River Basins  are  the major
constituent of the sub-oceanic crust.
  The  behavior  of the trace  elements during  the
formation of  the igneous  rocks  is predictable to  a
considerable  degree  from  their crystallochemical
relations  to the major  elements  of the crystallizing
minerals.  Nickel and  chromium  follow  magnesium
closely  and are concentrated  in  the  magnesium-rich
ultramafic rocks that are hosts for the major ores of
chromium.  The minerals of basaltic rocks concentrate:
Cu, Zn, and V. Those of granitic rocks concentrate the
large cations: K, Ba, Pb, the lanthanides, Zr, U, and Th
and the very small ones, Be.
  At various stages  of igneous processes, by mechanisms
that  are still in dispute, sulfur-rich fluids separate and
form  the sulfide deposits. Although these  constitute a
very small  fraction  of  the Earth's crust, they are the
principal ores of Cu, Zn, Pb, Hg, Sb, and Mo, and the
major sources of the byproduct trace metals Ag, Cd, T£,
In, Ge, and  Re.
  Rocks at  or near the surface of the Earth are subjected
to the chemical attack of the atmosphere and ground
waters. Water, CO2, oxygen, and organic compounds are
the principal reagents. The reactions are affected by: the
composition of the original rocks, pH, the  oxidation
potential,  and  the activity  of plants, animals,  and
microbes. The constitutent minerals of the original rocks
may  be altered  to other minerals,  or may be  dissolved
partially or completely, either to precipitate elsewhere,
or to be carried to the ocean.  The sediments of these
minerals are the major  scavengers of trace elements on
our  planet.  Fortunately,  practically  all the  trace
elements reaching the ocean do not remain in solution,
except  B,  Br,  and Se. More  than  99  percent are
deposited in the oceanic sediments (5, 6).
  Although  they  constitute only 5  percent of the
continental  crust of the earth, the sedimentary rocks and
soils  are  of far greater importance to man than  their
magnitude  would indicate  for two reasons:  (a)  they
constitute a large part  of the material exposed at the
surface, and (b) they are the materials from which plants
and animals derive  their food. Shales and clays are the
most  important sedimentary rocks.  Estimates of the
relative abundances  of the  types of sedimentary  rocks
differ;  shales and clays 5j 77 percent, sandstones^ 15

-------
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
percent, limestones and dolomites 7.5 to 8  percent (7).
  Where  the  sedimentary  rocks  are  fine-grained,
adsorption plays an important role in the concentration
of trace elements. In addition, sedimentary  rocks which
are rich in organic matter, especially the carbonaceous
shales,  preferentially  concentrate  many  elements,
including Hg, As, Mo, Ge, V, and U. The mechanism of
concentration  is  poorly  understood,  despite  its
importance (8).
  Chemical weathering has produced many  of our most
important  ore deposits.  Examples  are   sedimentary
aluminum,  iron  and  manganese   oxides,  the  nickel
silicates,  and the  placer concentrates of minerals that
resist breakdown during weathering. The latter are major
source  of Ti (as  rutile and as ilmenite), Zr (as zircon),
the lanthanides and Th (as monazite), Au, and the Pt
metals. The  marine phosphorites, chemical precipitates
from  the oceans, are notable concentrators of many
trace elements, including U, V, the lanthanides, As, Zn,
Cd, and Hg (9). Finally, mention must be made of coal
and petroleum, the natural transformation  products of
plant  material, in  which  many   trace  elements are
present.
  In  the  summaries  that follow  concerning the
distribution  of lead,  cadmium, arsenic,  and mercury,
particular attention  is directed towards concentrations
of these elements in natural materials whose present uses
(coal, phosphorite, sedimentary iron ores) or possible
future  uses  (oil shale)  could  cause  environmental
problems. Data on trace element contents  of coal and
petroleum are summarized (10), and  on black shales
(11).  All  four  of  these  elements  are  produced
commercially from sulfide ores.
  Data on  concentrations of lead,  cadmium, arsenic,
and mercury  in surface waters of the United States are
also summarized. The figures are given for the resultant
of the amounts of  these elements is the  sum of the
elements derived from weathering plus those introduced
by volcanic emanations plus  those  introduced into the
environment by man's activities.
LEAD
  Data on the  abundance of lead in natural materials are
summarized in Table  1. The element is rather uniformly
distributed  in these materials, with some degree of
concentration  in  clayey   sediments.  It is  highly
concentrated in sulfide deposits.
  Data on the concentrations of lead in filtered surface
waters  of the United States are summarized in Table 2.
The amount  introduced  into the  ocean by chemical
weathering  of rocks is  appreciable (6, 10), but is less
than the amount of lead  emitted to the atmosphere in
the United States alone (12), and far less than the annual
consumption of lead. It seems safe to estimate that more
than 90 percent  of the  lead  discharged  into the
atmosphere and streams can be ascribed to man-made
sources.
 TABLE 1  CONCENTRATIONS OF LEAD IN SOME
           NATURAL MATERIALS, PPM
Type of
material
Continental crust
Basaltic igneous
Silicic igneous
Shales and clays
Black shales (high C)
Deep sea clays
Limestones
Sandstones
Soils
Phosphorites
Coals
Range usually
reported
—
2- 18
6- 30
16- 50
7-150
-
-
< 1- 31
1-150
<10-100
2- 50
Average
15
6
18
20
30
80
9

15
10
15
TABLE 2  DISSOLVED LEAD IN SURFACE WATERS
          OF THE U. S.

                 (See Reference 13)
         Microg/liter               % of
          (~ ppb Pb)            717 samples
< 1
1- 4
5- 9
10-19
20-29
30-79
> (max. 80)
35.8
33.9
15.8
9.8
2.9
1.5
0.3
CADMIUM
  Data  on  the abundance  of cadmium  in natural
materials are summarized in Table 3; the geochemistry
of cadmium has been  reviewed  (14). Cadmium is a
relatively  rare  element  being  concentrated  in
zinc-bearing sulfide ores (ratio Zn/Cd  usually 100  to
200)  and  consequently  in  all  zinc-containing
manufactured products.
  It is  somewhat concentrated in shales and clays and is
notably concentrated in phosphorites. Consequently, it
is present in manufactured phosphate fertilizers.
  Most fresh waters contain  less  than  1  ppb Cd. The
chemistry of cadmium and zinc in surface  and ground
waters  has  been reviewed recently  (15),   giving
calculations  of   equilibrium  solubilities with  the
hydroxide or carbonate as solid phase. Most  waters were
unsaturated with respect  to  these  phases.  About 20
percent had cadmium contents in reasonable agreement
with  solubilities  calculated  assuming  CdCOs   as
equilibrium  solid phase. Analyses  of sea water average
about 0.15 microg/1. (~ppb).

-------
                                                      TRACE METALS - NATURAL SOURCES
   TABLE 3  CONCENTRATIONS OF CADMIUM IN
             SOME NATURAL MATERIALS, PPM
Type of
material
Continental crust
Basaltic igneous
Silicic igneous
Shales and clays
Black shales (high C)
Deep sea clays
Limestones
Sandstones
Soils
Phosphorites
Coals
Range usually
reported
_
0.006-
0.003-
0
0.5 -
0.1 -
-
-
0.1 -

0.6
0.18
11
8.4
1


0.5*
0 -170
—

Average
0.2
0.2
0.15
1.4
2.0
0.5
0.05
0.05
0.3*
30
2
                          TABLE 5  CONCENTRATIONS OF ARSENIC IN
                                    SOME NATURAL MATERIALS, PPM
  *Excluding soils from mineralized areas.


  Table 4  summarizes data on  surface waters of the
United States. Concentrations above natural background
are almost  certainly due to industrial waste. Even higher
concentrations (up to 450 ppb Cd) have been reported
in the South Fork of the Coeur d'Alene River in Idaho
(16),  a stream that drains an area containing extensive
dumps of ground mill tailings from Pb-Ag-Zn ores.
  As with lead, it seems safe to estimate that  more than
90 percent  of  the  cadmium discharged  to  the
atmosphere and streams  in  the  environment  can be
ascribed to man-made sources.
ARSENIC
  Data  on  the  concentrations  of  arsenic in natural
materials,  recently reviewed  (17), are summarized in
Table 5. Arsenic is  especially concentrated  in sulfide
ores, predominantly as arsenopyrite (FeAsS), but also as
a constituent of many  complex sulfides of copper and
lead, .such as  enargite  and tennantite.  Arsenic  is
concentrated in  shales,  clays,  phosphorites, coals,

   TABLE 4 CADMIUM IN FILTERED SURFACE
             WATERS OF THE U. S.
                 (See Reference 13)
         Microg/liter
         (~PPbCd)
   %of
727 samples
         <  1                       54.2
             1-  4                  32.3
            5-  9                   7.7
        	USPH upper limit	
           10- 20                   4.1
           21- 40                   0.9
           41-130                   0.8
Type of
material
Continental crust
Basaltic igneous
Silicic igneous
Shales and clays
Deep sea clays
Limestones
Sandstones
Soils
Phosphorites
Sedimentary Fe ores
Sedimentary Mn ores
Range usually
reported
—
0.2- 10
0.2- 13.8
-
-
0.1- 8.1
0.6- 9.7
0 - 102*
0.4-2000
70 -1100
up to 1.5%
Average
2.0
2.0
2.0
10.
13.
1.7
2
5*
13
400
-__
                                   100.0
 *Exeluding soils from mineralized ares

sedimentary  iron,  and  manganese  ores.  Industrial
processes  using  these  materials  supply considerable
amounts of  arsenic to  the atmosphere and to surface
waters.  Another possible source  is petroleum. Recent
analyses show 0.005 to 1.1 (median 0.09) ppm As, but
there are few analyses.
  Most of the arsenic in non-marine shales is associated
with the  clay minerals, whereas  in  offshore marine
samples a considerable proportion of  the arsenic  is
present in pyrite FeS2 (18). The arsenic in coal may also
be present in pyrite. Strong positive correlation between
the contents of arsenic  and of organic carbon have been
found for the Pierre Shale  (19), and for unconsolidated
sediments of Lake Michigan (20). The latter had much
higher arsenic contents  in the near-surface sediments (0
to 6 cm.) than in  those at depths greater than 20 cm.
(12.4 vs. 5.3  ppm). This indicates a recent increase in the
proportion due to man's activities.
  In the manufacture  of  superphosphate fertilizer by
treatment of phosphorite with sulfuric  acid, most of the
arsenic  present  in the phosphorite  passes  into the
manufactured fertilizer. If the sulfuric acid used is made
from sulfide  ores, it is likely to  contain considerable
arsenic.  Superphosphate made in  this way  has been
reported to contain up to 0.1 percent As.
  Data on filtered  surface  waters  of the United States
are summarized in  Table  6. The concentrations of
arsenic  are  evidently due,  in  part, to  industrial
contamination, and probably, in  part,  to urban wastes
such as high-phosphate detergents (21). It should be
noted that  fumarolic gases associated with volcanism
have been reported to  contain up to  0.7 ppm As and
that waters of hot springs contain up  to 13.7 ppm As.
Most ground waters are low in arsenic, averaging perhaps
1 ppb As, but concentrations high enough to  endanger
health (22), have been reported often enough to warrant
concern.

-------
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
   TABLE 6  DISSOLVED ARSENIC IN FILTERED
   	SURFACE WATERS OF THE U. S.

                 (See Reference 13)
          Microg/liter              % of
          (~ ppb As)            728 samples
        <  10
           10-   19
           20-   29
           30-   49
76.8
15.8
 3.5
 2.5
  	USPHS upper limit	
           50-  99                 1.1
          100-1100                 0.3
                                  100.0
  Although  quantitive data  is lacking,  it has  been
suggested that microbial action, under highly'reducing
natural conditions, might lead to the formation of arsine
or other volatile arsenic compounds.
  Although  data  are  insufficient  for an estimate of
magnitude, it seems probable that the natural  sources
mentioned, including the erosion of surface rocks, may
account for a significant portion  of the  discharge of
arsenic to the atmosphere and streams.
MERCURY
  Recent concern over the health hazards of mercury
has  triggered  much  research  on  its geochemistry,
including   the  appearance of  reviews  (23—25).
Nevertheless, the  average abundances listed in Table 7
are much  more uncertain than those for  the elements
previously discussed. This is due in part because of the

  TABLE 7  CONCENTRATIONS OF MERCURY IN
            SOME NATURAL MATERIALS, PPM
Type of
material
Continental crust
Basaltic igneous
Silicic igneous
Shales and clays
Black shales (high C)
Deep sea clays
Limestones
Sandstones
Soils
Phosphorites
Coals
Range usually
reported
—
0.002- 0.5 *
0.005- 0.4 *
0.005- 1.0 *
0.03 - 2.8
0.02 - 2.0
0.01 - 0.22*
0.001- 0.3 *
0.001- 0.5 f
0.001- 0.95
0.05 -13.3 *
Average
0.06
0.05 *
0.06 *
0.16 *
0.5
0.4
0.04 *
0.05 *
0.05 f
0.050
0.3 *
difficulty of analysis for such low concentrations, and
because  of  the  uncertainty  caused  by the very high
concentrations reported in some areas of the world (23).
Some of the estimates in Table  7, especially those for
shales, deep sea clays, and coals are higher than previous
estimates and may still be too low, on shales, (26); on
river, lake, and ocean  sediments  (27—35).  The cycle of
mercury in the environment has been reviewed (36).
  Mercury is concentrated in sulfide  ores, especially
those of zinc and to a lesser extent in those of copper.
The  determination of mercury has been widely used as a
tool in geochemical prospecting for such ore deposits. It
is  notably concentrated in shales and  clays, especially
those rich in organic matter, in some phosphorites, and
in coal (20, 37-40).  Up to 2.9 ppm  Hg has  been
reported in petroleum, but there are too few analyses to
permit an estimate of the environmental impact.
  Mercury can  reach the environment  from all these
sources, either by the action of chemical weathering or
during industrial processing.  Mercury differs from the
other elements in two important respects. First, its vapor
pressure, even at surface temperatures, is  so high that
direct volatilization to the atmosphere is significant (see
Table 9).  A  very high proportion of the mercury present
in coal is volatilized during burning.  Second, it is now
well  established  that the  mercury  in  fluvial and
lacustrine sediments can  be  converted,  by microbial
action,  into  organic  mercury  compounds  (methyl
mercury). These compounds  are partly  volatilized and
partly taken  up  by  living   matter,  especially  fish;
reintroducing them to the environment.
  Data  on the  concentrations of mercury in filtered
surface waters of the  U.S. are summarized in  Table 8.
The  available  evidence  indicates that most of  the
mercury   reaching  streams,  lakes, and the  ocean is
precipitated  rapidly.
  Mercury is a constituent of volcanic emanations (Table
9) and  of fumarolic vapors and hot  springs associated
with volcanic emanations. Although data are insufficient

 TABLE 8  DISSOLVED Hg IN FILTERED SURFACE
	WATERS OF THE U. S.	

             (See References  13 and 41)
          Microg/liter               % of
	(~ ppb Hg)             706 samples
                                                               <0.5
                                                                 0.1-  0.4
                                                                 0.5-  2.0
                                                                 2.0-  4.9
                                                       52,1
                                                       21.8
                                                       15.7
                                                        5.8
 *Nol including many analyses, especially from the Donets
  Basin. Kerch-Taman area, and Crimea, USSR, that show
  contents 10-1000 times the average given.
 fExcluding soils from mineralized areas
                          	EPA upper limit	
                              5.0- 9.9                  2.0
                             11-0-19.9                  ].6
                           > 20   (max. 740)            1.0
                                                      100.0 '"

-------
                                                    TRACE METALS - NATURAL SOURCES
                   TABLE 9 MERCURY IN AIR AND IN VOLCANIC EMANATIONS, (IN
                             NANOGRAMS PER CUBIC METER) (1 NANOGRAM=l(r9 g.)
                                  Sample
              Range
                                                 AIR
                Over Pacific Ocean, 20 miles offshore
                Arizona and Calif., unmineralized areas
                California
                Chicago area
                Moscow and Tula regions, USSR
                400 ft. above porphyry copper deposits, USA
                400 ft. above mercury deposits, USA
                Over mercury deposit, USSR
             0.6-0.7
               3-9
               1-50
               3-39
              80-300
               7-53
              24-108
             200-1200
                                     AIR and GASES, volcanic regions
                Air, Kamchatka region, USSR
                Air, Honolulu, Hawaii
                Air, Sulfur Banks, Kilauea Volcano
                Air, vent breccias of mud volcanoes USSR
                Gases, mud volcanoes USSR
                Gases, Mendeleev, and Sheveluch Volcanoes, USSR
                Gases from hot springs, Kamchatka and Kuriles
              40-910*
          21,400-23,300*
             300-700
             700-2000
             300-4000
          10,000-18,000
                 "Data source reference 42.

to permit quantitative estimates, the very large amount
of material involved, especially the  emanations from
mud volcanoes, indicates the proportion  of mercury
reaching the atmosphere and waters from natural sources
must be high; possible of the order of 30 to 70 percent
of the total.
  A recent study (27)  (see Figure 1) gives data on the
mercury  contents  of   a  drill  core  taken  from  the
Average
   9.7

  27
  60
                            190
sediments of southeastern Lake Ontario, which show a
spectacular  increase  of mercury  from 1906 to  the
1940's.  From these  data, the  present  daily input of
mercury into Lake Ontario is estimated to be 42 Ib. (19
kg.) Hg  from natural sources and 83 Ib  (37.6 kg) from
industrial sources (27).  In this industrialized area, man's
activities supply about two-thirds of the mercury.

-------
      CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
I
I —
Q_
LU
Q
     0
     1
     2
     3
     4
     5
     6
     7
     8
     9
   10
   20
   30
   40
   50
                                                             1965-
A  	
 _Q
 Q.
 a
 ao
 n
 Q
1970

1959
"O
 a:
 O
                                                                               1885-
                                   AMBROSIA HORIZON
                                                                              •1830-
               300  400   500  600  700  800  900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400

                               TOTAL  MERCURY  IN  ppb
                     Figure 1. The  vertical distribution  of  total  observed
                             mercury in core E30, expressed in ppb.
                    Reproduced by permission of the Nail. Res. Counci] of Canada
                    from the Canadian Jour, of Earth Set., 9, 636-651 (1972).

-------
                                                     TRACE METALS - NATURAL SOURCES
REFERENCES
 1. Parker, R. L.,Data of Geochemistry, Composition of
       the earth's crust, U. S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper
       440-D, D1-D19, 1967.
 2. Wedepohl, K. H., Composition and abundance  of
       common    igneous   rocks,   Handbook   of
       Geochemistry,  1, 227—249,  Springer Verlag,
       Berlin, and New York, 1969.
 3. Tourtelot,  H. A., Chemical compositions of rock
       types  as factors in our environment, Geol. Soc.
       Am. Mem. 123,13-30,1971.
 4. Hopps, H. C. and H. L. Cannon, editors, Symposium
       on geochemical environment in relation to health
       and disease, Ann.  N. Y. Acad. Sci.  199, 1-352,
       1972.
 5. Rankama,   Kalervo,   and   Sahama,  Th.   G.,
       Geochemistry,  Univ.  Chicago  Press,  1—912,
       1950.
 6. Goldberg,  E. D.,  Minor  elements  in sea water,
       Chemical Oceanography, Vol. 1,  J. P. Riley and
       G. Skirrow, editors, Academic Press, London and
       New York, 163-196, 1965.
 7. Wedepohl, K. H., Composition and abundance  of
       common   sedimentary   rocks,  Handbook  of
       Geochemistry,  1, 250-271,  Springer Verlag,
       Berlin, and New York, 1969.
  8. Saxby,  J.  D.,  Metal-organic  chemistry of the
       geochemical cycle, Rev. Pure Appl. Chem, 19,
       131-150, 1969.
  9. Gulbrandsen,   R.  A.,  Chemical composition  of
       phosphorites  of  the  Phosphoria Formation,
       Geochim.  et  Cosmochim.  Acta., 30, 769-778,
       1966.
 10. Bertine, K.  K.  and  E. D. Goldberg, Fossil fuel
       combustion and the  major sedimentary  cycle,
       Science 173,233-235,1971.
 11. Vine, J. D. and  E. B. Tourtelot, Geochemistry of
       black shale deposits  — a summary  report, Econ.
       Geol. 65,253-272, 1970.
 12. National  Academy  of  Sciences, Committee  on
       Biologic  Effects  of  Atmospheric Pollutants,
       Lead, Airborne lead in perspective, 330, 1972.
 13. Durum,  W.  H.,  J.  D.  Hem, and  S. G.  Heidel,
       Reconnaissance of selected minor elements in
       surface waters of the United States, Oct.1970, U.
       S. Geol. Survey Circ. 643, 1-49,1971.
 14. Wakita, H. and R. A.  Schmitt, Cadmium: Handbook
       of Geochemistry, K. H. Wedepohl, ed., Vol. 11/2,
       23,  Springer  Verlag,  Berlin,  and  New  York,
       1970.
 15. Hem, J. D., Chemistry and occurrence of cadmium
       and zinc  in surface  and ground waters,  Water
       Resources Research 8, 661-679,1972.
 16. Mink, L. L., R. E. Williams, and A. T. Wallace, Effect
       of industrial and domestic effluents on the water
       quality of the Coeur d'Alene  River basin, Idaho
       Bur. Mines Geol. Pamphlet 149, 1-95,1971.
17. Onishi, H., Arsenic, Handbook of Geochemistry, K.
       H. Wedepohl,  ed.,  Vol.  II-l,  38 pp. Springer
       Verlag, Berlin, and N. Y., 1969.
18. Tourtelot,  H.  A., Minor-element composition and
       organic carbon content of marine and nonmarine
       shales of Late  Cretaceous  age in  the  western
       interior  of the  United  States,  Geochim.  et
       Cosmochim. Acta. 28, 1579-1604,1964.
19. Tourtelot,  H.  A., L. G. Schultz,  and J.  R.  Gill,
       Stratigraphic variation and chemical composition
       of the Pierre shale in South Dakota and adjacent
       parts of North Dakota, Nebraska, Wyoming, and
       Montana, U. S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper  400-B,
       B447-B452, 1960.
20. Ruch, R. R.,  E.  J. Kennedy, and N. F. Slump,
       Studies of Lake Michigan bottom sediments, IV;
       Distribution   of  arsenic  in   unconsolidated
       sediments  from Lake  Michigan,  111, Geol.
       Survey Environmental Geol. Notes (37) 1—16,
       1970.
21. Angino, E. E., L.  M. Magnuson, T. C. Waugh, 0. K.
       Galle,  J.  Bredfeldt,  Arsenic  in  detergents:
       Possible  danger and pollution hazard,  Science
       168,389-390,1970.
22. Borgono,  J.  M.  and  R.  Greiber, Epidemiological
       study  of arsenicism in the city  of Antofogasta,
       Proc.  Univ.  Missouri  5th Ann.  Conf. Trace
       Substances  in Environmental  Health,  13—14,
       publ. 1972,1971.
23. U. S. Geol. Survey, Mercury in the environment, U.
       S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 713,1-67,1970.
24. Jonasson, I. R., Mercury in the natural environment:
       a review of recent work, Canada Geol. Survey
       Paper 70-57,1-39,1970.
25. Jonasson, 1. R. and R. W. Boyle, Geochemistry ot
       mercury and origins of natural contamination of
       the  environment,  Can.  Mining Met. Bull 65
       (717), 32 39,1972.
26. Cameron, E. M.  and I.  R.  Jonasson, Mercury in
       Precambrian  shales of  the Canadian  Shield,
       Geochim. et Cosmochim. Acta.  36, 985—1006,
       1972.
27. Thomas, R.  L., The distribution of mercury in the
       sediments of Lake Ontario, Can. Jour. Earth Sci.
       9,636-651,1972.
28. Kennedy, E. J.,  R. R. Ruch, and N. F. Shimp,
       Distribution  of  mercury  in  unconsolidated
       sediem from southern  Lake Michigan, 111. Geol.
       Survey Environmental Geol., Notes (44) 1—18
       1971.
29. Burton, J. D. and T. M.  Leatherland, Mercury in a
       coastal  marine  environment,  Nature   231,
       440-441, 1971.
30. Aston, S. R., D. Bruty, R. Chester, and J. P. Riley,
       Distribution  of  mercury  in  North  Atlantic
       deep-sea sediments, Nature, Phys. Sci., 237, (77)
       125,1972.

-------
10
CYCLING AND CONTROLS OF METALS
31. Cronan, D. S., The  Mid-Atlantic Ridge near 45° N.
       XVII,   Al,  As,  Hg,  and  Mn  in ferruginous
       sediments from  the  Median Valley, Can. Jour.
       Earth Sci. 9,319-323,1972.
32. Collinson, Charles and N. F. Shimp, Trace elements
       in bottom sediments from Upper Peoria  Lake,
       middle   Illinois   River,   HI.  Geol.  Survey
       Environmental Geology Notes 56, 1—21,  1972.
33. Cranston,   R.  E. and  D.  E.  Buckley,  Mercury
       pathways in  a river  and estuary, Environment
       Sci. Technol. 6, 274-278, 1972.
34. Vernet, J. P. and R. L. Thomas, Levels of mercury in
       the sediments of some Swiss lakes including Lake
       Geneva  and  the Rhone  River,  Eclogae  Geol.
       Helvetiae 65, 293-306,1972.
35. Vernet, J. P. and R. L. Thomas, The occurrence and
       distribution  of mercury in the sediments of the
       Petit Lac (western Lake Geneva), Eclogae  Geol.
       Helvetiae 65, 307-316, 1972.
36. Gavis, J. and J. F. Ferguson, The cycling of mercury
       through  the  environment,  Water Research 6,
                                                  989-1008,1972.
                                           37. Joensuu, O. I., Fossil fuels as a source  of mercury
                                                  pollution, Science 172, 1027-1028, 1971.
                                           38. O'Gorman, J. V., N. H. Suhr, and P. L.  Walker, Jr.,
                                                  The determination of mercury in some American
                                                  coals, Appl. Spectroscopy 26, 44-48, 1972.
                                           39. Schlesinger, M.  D. and H. Schultz, An evaluation of
                                                  methods for  detecting  mercury in some U. S.
                                                  coals, U. S. Bur. Mines Rept. Invest, no. 7609,
                                                  1-11,1972.
                                           40. Swanson, V. E. and J. D. Vine, Composition of coal,
                                                  S.  W. United States, Geol. Soc. Ann. Program
                                                  Ann. Meeting, 683-684 (abs.), 1972.

                                           41. Jenne,  E. A., Mercury in waters of the United States,
                                                 U. S. Geol. Survey Open-File Rept., 1—34, April
                                                 1,1972.
                                           42. Eshleman, A., S. M.  Siegel,  and B.  Z.  Siegel, Is
                                                 mercury  from Hawaiian  volcanoes  a natural
                                                 source  of  pollution?  Nature,   233  (5320)
                                                 471-472,1971.

-------
              THE  LEAD  INDUSTRY  AS A  SOURCE  OF
               TRACE  METALS  IN  THE  ENVIRONMENT
      B. G. WIXSON, E. BOLTER, N. L. GALE, J. C. JENNETT AND K. PURUSHOTHAMAN
                                   The University of Missouri—Rolla
                                            Rolla, Missouri
 INTRODUCTION
  During the past five years the world's most modern
 lead industry has developed in a remote  Ozark's section
 of Southeastern Missouri. The economical impact of
 this  vast mineral resource is just starting to be known
 and promises to offset predictions that sufficient mineral
 reserves still must be discovered in order to meet lead
 demands during the  balance of this century (1). The
 third annual report  of  the council on environmental
 quality (2) emphasized that the low-cost lead producers
 in Missouri would be able to maintain peak production
 and  be able to absorb  pollution control  costs  while
 high-cost lead producers in other states may be unable to
 raise the required capital for pollution control and be
 forced to close.
  In 1970 the Viburnum  Trend  or New Lead  Belt
 ranked first in the world by producing 432,576 tons of
 lead  ore (3), and in 1971 continued to pace the United
 States in lead production (4). Present production trends
 for the period January through July 1972 indicate that
 289,073  tons  of lead have been  recovered, which is
 46,000 tons above the same period in 1971  (5).  This
 rapid industrial development in a sparsely  populated
 rural forest region  has resulted in the release of lead,
 copper,  zinc, cadmium, and other trace metals into a
 formerly unaffected  ecosystem. Due to  this abrupt
 change, the mining district has become a unique area for
 studying  the  impact  of trace  metals and  developing
 techniques  to  control  detrimental  effects. Pollution
 abatement studies have been conducted since 1967 and
 during the  past 18 months an interdisciplinary team,
 supported by the National Science Foundation RANN
 Lead Study Program with the assistance of local citizens,
the mining industry, concerned local, state, and Federal
agencies, have  conducted an extensive investigation on
the environmental effects of this industrial development.
A  complete  report  of  this  investigation  has  been
published  as  an interim progress  report to  National
Science Foundation (6).
  Research  has  been  carried  out  to  determine
background values, to  establish natural baselines (7, 8)
and to evaluate the lead industry as a source of trace
metals in the environment. The unusual topography and
drainage pattern of the mining area assisted, since it was
possible to study control sites on streams in the same
area that were not affected by industrial development.
By  further  use of  selected sites  below  individual
mine-mill  operations, wastewater effects  on receiving
streams could be studied. The location of   the New
Lead  Belt, the  unique stream drainage pattern, mines
and mills, settling lagoons, a lead  smelter, and stream
sampling sites are shown in Figure 1.
  Sources  of trace  metals in the environment were
associated with: symbol  A,   the  mining and milling
operations with problems of grinding, concentrating and
transporting ores, and  disposal of tails along with mine
and mill wastewater; and symbol B, the smelter-refinery
process with problems of concentrate haulage, storage,
sintering, refining, atmospheric discharges, and blowing
dust. The systematic exchange and  transport from these
operations are illustrated in Figure  2 which depicts the
possible sources of trace metals in  the environment of
the New Lead Belt of Southeastern Missouri.

MINING AND MILLING SOURCES
  Efficient and  modern engineering designs have been
incorporated into the mines and mills within the New
Lead Belt. Galena (lead) is the principal ore mined with
lesser   quantities  of  sphalerite  (zinc),  chalcopyrite
(copper), and silver recovered  as economic co-products.
Geologically the lead ore is disseminated throughout the
Cambrian  Bonneterre Formation, mostly a dolomite, at
depths ranging  from  700 to  1,200 feet.  Since  the
producing formation also serves as  a good aquifer, most
mines must  employ constant pumping, ranging from
3,000 to  7,000 gpm, in order to prevent flooding. This
inflow of  water has reduced  mine dust as a potential
problem source but the mine water pumped to  the
                                                  11

-------
CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
                                          MINE

                                          MINE UNDER
                                          CONSTRUCTION
                                          SETTLING POND
                                                      SCALE
              SMELTER

              SAMPLING
              SITES
              CONTROL
              SAMPLING
MILES     6   SITES
                                                              MISSOURI
                                                                    NEW LEAD
                                                                       BELT|
                                                                      I
                                                                      N
                                                             TO
                                                         CLEARWATER
                                                           RESERVOIR
                                                                       I
                Figure 1. The New Lead Belt of southern Missouri.

-------
                                           TRACE METALS - LEAD INDUSTRY
                                                    13
                              LEAD       ZINC
                             COPPER    CADMIUM
                                     ORE
     LEAD,  ZINC,
         AND
       COPPER
    CONCENTRATE
 MILLING  AND
CONCENTRATION
TRANSPORT
    BY
  RUNOFF
                                                                  SEDIMENTS
   LEAD  CONC. BY
   ROAD  OR  RAIL
    TO  SMELTER
    OR  STORAGE
                          SMELTING
                          PROCESS
                                   VEGETATION
     TRANSPORT
 BY  ROAD  OR  RAIL
      TO OTHER
   SMELTERS AND
OTHER  ECOSYSTEMS
 ZINC, COPPER
AND  CADMIUM
    MATTE
                                 FINISHED
                                   METAL
                                 PRODUCTS
                 Figure 2. Sources of trace metals in the environment of
                         the New Lead Belt of Southeastern Missouri.

-------
14
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
surface  does  contain  an appreciable amount  of fine
galena and  associated  trace  metals as well as associated
spillage from equipment operations and maintenance.
  Generally mines in the new mining district are worked
by a standard room-and-pillar method. The back ore is
drilled  and  shot  in one or  two passes  followed by
haulage  to a gyratory  crusher  via large diesel loaders or
locomotive-drawn   rail cars.   After  primary  crushing
underground, the ore is hoisted to the surface in a skip.
Most of the mines also employ two shafts,  one for men
and equipment and one for  ore hoisting and charging of
the ore bin at the mill. Since automation is a key factor,
the best known equipment and technology  is employed
at the mines.
  Part of the water pumped  from the mines is utilized as
a  process  water,  for the  milling  procedure,  where
                                                     chemical  reagents are added during the flotation circuit
                                                     to separate the  lead, zinc or copper minerals from the
                                                     finely ground rock  or  gangue.  The flotation reagents
                                                     usually  consist  of  chemical  collectors,  frothers,
                                                     depressants, and activants.
                                                       The lead and  zinc, and sometimes copper, minerals
                                                     from the  flotation process are pumped into thickeners,
                                                     where the concentrate settles leaving the water, excess
                                                     flotation  reagents, colloidal, and supracolloidal minerals
                                                     to be discharged as a milling effluent. The concentrate is
                                                     vacuum dried by various methods and then transported
                                                     to smelters for  the final conversion of metal. A typical
                                                     mine and mill production flow  chart is illustrated in
                                                     Figure 3.
                                                       The water and tailing wastes from the mine and mill
                                                     operations are discharged into settlement and treatment
            £ TIRE-MOUNTED ax*:*:
         :;;;S;:JUMBO-DRILL          : PRIMARY
PRODUCTION
HAULAGE
           •.•.•.•.•.-.•.•.•.•...     .^.            t.  q            aom
           E  *:EVEL:|   £^£*?riT?O  ^*  Q   ^8
                                                                                        SECONDARY
                                                                             PRIMARY  CRUSHER
                                                                              SCREEN
                                                                  SKIPS
                                                                  TO  SURFACE
                                                                 SKIP
                                                                 LOADER
                                                   FINE
             LEAD
         FLOTATION
                        MILL  CYCLONES     ORE BINS    SAMPLE
                                                                           TERTIARY
                                                                          rCRUSHER
                                                                                   SECONDARY
                                                                                    SCREENING
                                                                                               ,u
          Pb  FLOTATION
              ROUGHER      CONCENTRATE
                                THICKENER   FILTER  I  HOPPER  CAR
                                                                                       SMELTER
                       -CLEANER
              Zn  FLOTATION
              ROUGHER
                             CONCENTRATE
                               THICKENER   FILTER    HOPPER  CAR
                                                                                ZINC  SMELTER
                                                                           ->- TA ILING  POND
                 Figure 3.  Mine-mill production flow chart. [Courtesy of Amax Lead Co. of Mo.]

-------
                                                            TRACE METALS - LEAD INDUSTRY
                                                  15
lagoons. The tailing pond dams are usually constructed
from the tails, generally less than  200 mesh in size, of
the ore concentration process  which are separated into
fine  and  coarse  fractions by cyclones, centrifugal
separators.   Once   the   dams  have   been  initially
constructed, the tailings  and  other liquid wastes are
introduced upsteam until the lagoon is effectively filled.
The lagoons are supposed to settle  out residual tails and
biologically  degrade  any  spent  organic   reagents
discharged from the milling process.
   In order to evaluate the effects of the developing lead
mines  on water quality  and aquatic ecosystems,  an
extensive sampling program was established. Twenty-one
principal sampling sites  were selected. Samples  were
bi-monthly  and  analyzed  for both heavy metals and
organic parameters of pollution.
   Quantitative   determinations of  the dissolved and
suspended metallic content of the water,  algae, stream
sediments,  and  aquatic  biological  specimens   were
determined using atomic  absorption techniques.  Basic
water  quality  measurements,  other than  metals,  were
performed (9).
   Visual  observations were made of the general stream
conditions, amount  of flow,  dominant plant life, and
apparent animal life.  Preliminary studies were conducted
to ascertain heavy metals concentrations  in algal  mats
and other  aquatic vegetation at  selected areas  both
upstream and  downstream from  selected sites where
contamination  was indicated.
   Heavy metal concentrations  in the streams, before the
start of the  mining activity and in the control streams
following the start of the activity, were found to be in
the  range of 1  to 20 parts per billion (ppb) for copper,
lead, and zinc. Most  of the values were in the 4 to 6 ppb
range  and the  water pH ranged from  7.0  to 8.8 (10).
Other geochemical background  values  were  1.5 to  27
ppm for  calcium, 0.8 to 5 ppm for sodium, 0.5 to 0.9
ppm for potassium, and up to 30 ppb for manganese.
   The results of lead analyses on selected stream sites,
over a  one  year  period, showed 22 separate  unfiltered
samples which  were in excess of the 0.05 ppm limit set
for drinking water by  the U.  S. Public Health Service
(11).  Six of  these samples, of  which  the  highest
contained  0.83  lead,  occurred  on  the same   day,
December 15,  1971. These high values were  invariably
concomitant with  storm  runoff, and the  stream  flow
during  the  storm  of December 15 was  of  sufficient
quantity and turbulence to achieve complete scouring of
the  bottom with  virtually complete  removal of the
biological slime layer on all affected streams.
  There were some 42 episodes noted where the  zinc
concentrations  were  above the 0.1  ppm established  as
the maximum  allowable concentration in  the Effluent
Guidelines  proposed  by  the  Missouri  Clean  Water
Commission. The  highest  value   (0.237  ppm)  was
observed  on December 15, concomitant  with  heavy
runoff.  Results therefore indicate  that problems with
zinc in  effluents occur  in two mining and  milling
effluent discharges.
  There  were 11 episodes of copper concentrations in
excess of the 0.02 ppm guidelines set by the Missouri
Clean Water Commission and  the U. S.  Public Health
Service standards for fish toxicity.
  Further investigations indicated that the heavy metal
content of mine and mill discharge  waters, in the New
Lead Belt of Southeastern Missouri, could be sufficiently
reduced  in  retention lagoons to permit discharge into
streams  (7).  Under  existing geochemical  conditions,
slightly  basic  pH and elevated  bicarbonate content,
excess  heavy  metals  are   probably precipitated  as
carbonates.
  Samples of algal mats, biological slimes, and aquatic
vegetation were collected for analysis of heavy metals
contamination  and   found   that   heavy   metals
concentrations were  highest, approximately 8000 ppm
on a dry  weight basis, near the tailings dams of muling
operations (12). The dense and tangled communities of
algae and associated  microconsumers were found to act
as excellent  filters in addition to their nutrient trapping
and  recycling abilities.  The  finely ground particles of
rock flour or minerals, that escaped the flotation process
and  tailings  reservoirs,  are  efficiently  trapped and
removed by  the benthic flora. Figure 4 illustrates the
accumulation  of  trace  metals in  algae on  streams
receiving mine and mill effluent.
     74,100
       4000
       3000
            r
              
-------
16
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
  Regardless of the aquatic  plant species tested, the
concentration of heavy metals was  most prolific on
those samples collected near the source of heavy metals
at the tailings ponds. The exact nature of the association
of the heavy metals with  the algae or other  plant life
remains  to  be established. Additional work  has  been
carried out  on some stream consumer organisms such as
tadpoles, crayfish, snails, minnows, and larger fishes, but
evaluations are incomplete at this time.
  Using  these  data and input  from the many other
research  areas involved in this study,  a number  of
recommendations have been made or implemented by
the mining companies, including:
A.  Dust containing heavy metals from the tailings dams
                                                    is suspect as a source of stream pollution and these
                                                    dams should be covered with soil and planted with
                                                    grass to prevent future problems.

                                                 B.  The lagoons used to treat the  milling wastes have
                                                    been redesigned to prevent short circuiting, thereby
                                                    allowing better sedimentation and biodegradation of
                                                    the   organic  reagents   used. Where  economically
                                                    possible,  total recirculation of the mill  water has
                                                    been  advised. Figure  5  illustrates the  modified
                                                    mining and milling lagoon waste treatment scheme
                                                    now employed at one mine as opposed to their prior
                                                    normal  mining and milling  wastewater ponding
                                                    scheme (13).
   GRINDING MILL
      LEAD-ZINC
         ORE
        FROM"
        MINE
                       FLOTATION
                       REAGENTS
                       ADDED
      WATER
     PUMPED
      FROM -
      MINE
                                      'CONCENTRATE
                                       THICKENERS
                EXCESS
                         FLOTATION
                           CELLS      EFFLUENT
                                     DISCHARGE
                                     OR  RECYCLE

                             TAILINGS
                                                             SETTLING  AND
                                                               TREATMENT
                                                                LAGOONS
                                                      5/DISCHARGE
                                                      1 I    TO
                                                      i J  RECEIVING
                                                           STREAMS
                WATER
                                      .CYCLONED
                           Figure 5a. Flow diagram of mining  and milling wastes.
GRINDING  MILL

 LEAD-ZINC
     ORE
FROM MINE
FLOTATION
REAGENTS
ADDED
       WATER
      PUMPED
       FROM
       MINE
                                           CONCENTRATE
                                            THICKENERS
                                                      SETTLING  AND TREATMENT LAGOONS
                                                                MINE  WATER  ONLY
                            WATEJ*
                                T-JOINT .
                                BAFFLE_/
                              DI S~C H A R G E
                                           EFFLUENT
                                         DISCHARGE
                                  TREATMENT AND
                                RECYCLING  LAGOON
                                   FOR TAILINGS
                                  AND MILL PROCESS
                                    WASTEWATER
                               RECYCLED
                                 WATER
                       TAILINGS FROM
                        MILLING AND
                      FLOTATION PROCESS

                                    CYCLONED
                       Figure 5b. Modified flow  diagram  for  treatment
                                 recycling of mining and milling wastes.
                                                                                DISCHARGE
                                                                                   TO
                                                                                RECEIVING
                                                                                STREAMS
                                                                         and

-------
                                                         TRACE METALS - LEAD INDUSTRY
                                                                         17
TRANSPORTATION SOURCES
  The effects of railroad and truck transportation of
lead, zinc, and copper concentrate has also been studied.
The  railroad, which  dissects  the  smelter area in a
north-south  direction, is used for transporting supplies
to the industries and for carrying out finished lead metal
or ore concentrates in gondola cars which are open at
the top. The influence of this ore concentrate haulage by
truck and railroad has been evaluated and elevated levels
of trace metals have been found at distances  of up to
100  feet from the road (6). Hants used in this study
were tall fescue, a domesticated forage grass, purple top,
a native  grass species, and blueberry. Values of 4000
ug/g (dry weight) were found for purple top at roadsides
along ore haulage routes, as compared with 49 ug/g (dry
weight) found along nonhaulage control routes.
  Concurrent work was carried out on soil samples taken
from traverses at right angles to haulage routes (6). Data
also indicated that the transport of ore  concentrate in
open  trucks or  railroad  cars,   without  coverage,
contributes  windblown  trace  metals  into   the
environment.  Additional research work  is being
continued to evaluate  amounts and  rates of  materials
and possible control measures.
SMELTER AREA SOURCES
  The industrial operations in  the  smelter area  involve
smelting sinter in  the blast furnace to produce finished
                         lead.  The  metallic  impurities  associated  with the
                         production of lead are copper, silver,zinc, and cadmium.
                         The  air  pollution problems created by  smelting the
                         sulfide-containing concentrates include sulfur  dioxide
                         derived from sinter machines; as well as dusts, and fumes
                         containing  lead  and  other heavy  metals  from the
                         sintering operation.
                           The smelter complex  converts galena  ore  to usable
                         metal. Lead concentrates, containing 65  to 75  percent
                         lead  and 14  to  17 percent sulfur, are brought to the
                         plant by rail  and trucks. Concentrates are mixed with
                         fluxing materials, such as silica and limestone, along with
                         granulated  slag and delivered to the  sintering plant,
                         where the mixture is roasted, to burn off the sulfur, and
                         converted  to  a   porous material  called sinter.  The
                         resulting sinter is combined with coke and charged into
                         the top of a blast furnace. The charge is ignited in a high
                         oxygen  environment,  melted,  and  reacted  to  form
                         molten lead  and slag.  Lead and slag flow  from the
                         furnace  into  a brick-lined  settler.  Slag  overflows the
                         settler into a  granulation pit, where it is  transferred to
                         storage. Lead  bullion is tapped into pots and transferred
                         to dressing kettles where  it is refined and cast into either
                         100 Ib pigs or 1-ton ingots. A typical general flow sheet
                         of lead smelting is shown  in Figure 6.
                           During normal production 450 tons of concentrates
                         are charged to the furnaces per day; the  smelter under
                                                                                       WIND
                                                                                       BLOWN
                                                                                       DUST
                                          FLUXES
                             LEAD
                      CONCENTRATES
   DUST
                                                   SINTER CHARGE
                                                     PREPARATION
                                                      SINTERING
                                                         COARSESINTER
                                                              FURNACE
                                                              CHARGE
                                                          PREPARATION
                                                           LEAD
                                                                   BLAST
                                                                 FURNACEl
                                                                MAIN
                                                                STACK
                  ACID
                  PLANT
                  STACK

       CLEANED  GAS
     TO  ATMOSPHERE
SILVER-LEAD-*—JREFINERY
D I I I  I I /•% Kl  T /"\     1	1	
BULLION  TO
   MARKET
r
GRANULATED!
    SLAG
                REFINED LEAD
                 TO  MARKET
       f
                       FUMES
                          DUSTCLEANED
                                 GAS TO
                             ATMOSPHERE
             SLAG
              TO
             DUMP

                 SS
                 GS
                 LS
                                                                            SILICA  SAND
                                                                            GRANULATED  SLAG
                                                                            LIMESTONE
                                Figure 6.  General flow sheet of lead smelting.

-------
18
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
these  conditions  emits  30 to  75 tons sulfur  dioxide
through a 200-ft  stack when sinter plant, sulfuric acid
recovery plant, and blast  furnace are operating.  This
particular  lead   industry  has  annually  contributed
approximately 11,000 to 27,400  tons of sulfur dioxide
and  about  100  to 200  tons  of particulate matter
depending upon the operation condition of the plant.

  Research  studies have  been  conducted with  three
sulfur dioxide monitoring stations, 10 dustfall  stations
and  two  meteorological stations. Sulfur dioxide was
continuously monitored.  Settleable   particulates were
collected once a  month, and wind direction and speed
were monitored continuously.
  The  settleable  particulate samples  were analyzed for
four metals, cadmium,  copper,  lead, and zinc by  the
atomic  absorption technique  and  the  results  were
reported  as  grams  per  square meter  per  month
(g/m2-month).
  The maximum values of deposition rates of particulate
lead have  occurred at  sampling stations which were
located near the railroad, even though the most frequent
wind direction was not always toward  these  stations
(14). This  indicates the influence  of the open  railroad
cars and the prevailing winds  around  the vicinity of the
stations. The annual average of settleable particulate lead,
for the ten sampling sites, is illustrated in Figure 7.
  The  particulate lead was found to be as high as 20.5
g/m2 per month  at station 7 with an annual average of
8.6 g/m2 per month. Normally, three locations (stations
3, 6, and 7) within a distance of 1000 ft from the stack
showed  high  deposition rates  as compared to  other
stations. This indicated that the metallic particulates do
not travel far from the source; hence more studies need
to  be   conducted  on  the size  distribution,  physical
properties, and  chemical characteristics of the heavy
metal-laden particulates.  The annual  average deposition
rates of particulate zinc, copper, and cadmium have been
found  to be in the decreasing order  of 0.53, 0.18, and
0.064  g/m2 per month,  respectively,  following  the
particulate lead.
  The  deposition rate of particulate  lead, zinc, copper,
and  cadmium decreases  with increasing distance from
the  stack.  At  this time,  information  on the radial
distribution of metallic  particulates  settling  upon  the
ground  is not known, but  will  be obtained to estimate
the heavy metal accumulation patterns.
  Further studies are being conducted to determine the
heavy   metal   concentration  in  airborne  suspended
particulates and to develop a model for the  short and
long-range atmospheric transport of metallic particulates
discharged from the lead smelting operations.
COOPERATION AND SOCIETAL RELEVANCE
  This   research  was  initiated  when  industry and  the
public began to wonder if an industry could operate in a
sensitive ecosystem without damaging a  national park.
The  study has received the  complete  cooperation  of
                                         10)0-87
                0-43(^9) BUICK  TOWER
  Figure 7. Settleable particulate lead—annual average
           (g/m2-mo).
concerned industries, the general public, and every local,
Federal and  State  agency  interested in the problem.
Research findings have been applied by industries to
control specific problem areas uncovered  during  this
study. This unique cooperation has become  a model for
environmental cooperation and has been observed  and
cited as being of benefit to the local community and its
surrounding (15).
  The  value of this cooperation was recently emphasized
(16). This spirit  of working together must be continued
if needed mineral resources are to be developed without
damage to the surrounding environment.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
  The  authors  would  like  to  acknowledge that  this
project was supported by the RANN (Research Applied
to National Needs) Lead Study Program of the National
Science  Foundation. The  AMAX  Lead Company of
Missouri and the St. Joe  Mineral Corporation are  due
thanks for  their continued support of research, technical
assistance, and help. Sincere  appreciation is also due to

-------
                                                           TRACE METALS - LEAD INDUSTRY
                                                 19
the Clark  National  Forest, the Missouri Clean Water
Commission, the Missouri Air Conservation Commission,
the Missouri Department  of  Conservation, the U.  S.
Bureau of  Mines, and representatives from Region VII,
EPA, Kansas City,  Missouri,  for  their assistance and
cooperation in this study.
REFERENCES CITED
  1. Lead-Airborne   Lead   in   Perspective.   National
        Academy  of Sciences,  Committee  on Biologic
        Effects  of Atmospheric Pollutants,  Washington,
        D.C.,2,1972.
  2. Environmental Quality - The Third Annual Report
        of  the  Council  on  Environmental  Quality.
        Council on Environmental Quality, Washington,
        D.C., 297,1972.
  3. The World's  No.   1  Lead   Producer.  Missouri
        Geological Survey  and  Water Resources, Rolla,
        Missouri Mineral News, 11,  No. 3, March 1971.
  4. Lead in  1971. Mineral Industries  Surveys, U.  S.
        Dept. of Interior,  Bureau of Mines, Washington,
        D. C.,Jan. 1972.
  5. Lead  Industry  in  July  1972.  Mineral  Industries
        Surveys,  U.  S. Dept.  of  Interior, Bureau  of
        Mines, Washington, D. C., Sept.  1972.
  6. An Interdisciplinary Investigation of Environmental
        Pollution  by  Lead and Other Heavy Metals from
        Industrial Development in the New Lead Belt of
        Southeastern   Missouri,  submitted   by   the
        Interdisciplinary Lead  Belt  Team, University of
        Missouri—Rolla,   to  the   National   Science
        Foundation RANN program, Vol. I & II, June 1,
        1972.
  7. Wixson, B. G., E. A. Bolter, N.  H. Tibbs, and A. R.
        Handler, Pollution From Mines in the 'New Lead
        Belt' of Southeastern Missouri. Proc. 24th Ind.
        Waste Conf., Purdue Univ.,  Ext. Ser. 135, 632,
        1969.
  8. Wixson, B. G., Water  Quality Protection in Streams
        in  Mining Districts, in  Developments  in Water
        Quality  Research,  H.  I.   Shuval  (Ed.),  Ann
       Arbor-Humphrey Science Publishers, Ann Arbor,
       Mich., and London, Eng., 199,1970.
 9. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
       Wastewater,  13th Ed., American Public Health
       Assoc., 1015 18th Street, N. W., Washington, D.
       C., 1971.
10. Bolter, E. and N. H. Tibbs, Water Geochemistry of
       Mining and Milling Retention Ponds in the 'New
       Lead Belt' of Southeastern Missouri. Completion
       Report to OWRR, Project  NO. A-032-MO, 34
       pages, 1971.
11. Jennett,  J. C., B. G. Wixson, E.  Bolter, and  J. O.
       Pierce, Environmental Problems and  Solutions
       Associated With the Development of the World's
       Largest Lead Mining District. Presented at  the
       Society    of   Engineering   Science    First
       International Meeting on Pollution: Engineering
       and Scientific  Solutions, Tel Aviv,  Israel and
       published in the  proceedings, June 1972.
12. Gale, N. H., M. G.  Hardie, J.  C. Jennett, and A.
       Aleti, Transport of Trace  Pollutants in  Lead
       Mining Wastewaters. Presented at  the  Sixth
       Annual  Conference on   Trace  Substances in
       Environmental  Health, Univ. of Mo.—Columbia
       and published in the proceedings, June 1972.

13. Jennett,  J. C. and B. G. Wixson, Problems in Lead
       Mining Waste Control. Jour. Water Poll. Control
       Fed., 44,2103,1972.
14. Purushothaman,  K.,  Air  Quality  Studies  of a
       Developing Lead Smelting Industry. Presented at
       the   Society  of  Engineering  Science  First
       International Meeting on Pollution: Engineering
       and  Scientific  Solutions, Tel Aviv, Israel and
       published in the proceedings, June 1972.
15. Zuckerman, S., et al., Report of the Commission on
       Mining and the  Environment.  London, England,
       Sept. 1972.
16. AMAX in Perspective. E/MJ  Engineering and Mining
       Jour., McGraw-Hill Pub., New York, N. Y., Sept.
       1972.

-------
             SOURCES OF TRACE  METALS FROM
      HIGHLY-URBANIZED SOUTHERN  CALIFORNIA
         TO THE ADJACENT  MARINE ECOSYSTEM
                   D. R. YOUNG, C-S.YOUNG, AND G. E. HLAVKA
                   Southern California Coastal Water Research Project
                              Los Angeles, California
INTRODUCTION
 The southern California coastal basin sustains one of
the most rapidly growing urban complexes in the United
States. Stretching more than 400 kilometers from Point
Conception to the U.S.—Mexico border over an area of
about 30,000 sq km (Figure 1), this basin is occupied by
                                   approximately  11,000,000  persons, or about five
                                   percent of the nation's  population.  Most of its
                                   population growth has occurred in Los Angeles and
                                   Orange Counties, in a pattern that now is being repeated
                                   in Ventura County to the north and San Diego county
                                   to the south.
  35
121°W    120°W   119°W   118°W
                                         117°W
116°W
115° W
                                                                114° W
  34°N
  33°N
  32°N
  31°N -
                                  CALIFORNIA
                 =«=VENTURA
        CONCEPTION
                  IP 6 M^ 1 ^ AtNcGoE L«E V
                      HYPERIONJ ORANGE
                             .P.^TH
                             O.C.S.D.
                                PT. LOMA
                                                ENSENADA
                                                 BAJA   \
                                               CALIFORNIA
         E3COASTAL PLAIN
        —DRAINAGE  DIVIDE
        KILOMETERS
           I	i
     Figure 1.  The coastal plain of southern California and the adjacent marine waters of the Southern
            California Bight.
                                     21

-------
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
  The  bordering Southern California Bight is bounded
on  the west by  the  California  current.  This  current
moves  southward along the California coast past Point
Conception,  and   turns   landward  several  hundred
kilometers to the  south, impinging upon the coast in the
vicinity of Cabo  Colnett,  Baja California, Mexico and
forming the southern boundary of the Bight. Part of the
current  then  turns  north, joining  a  complicated
circulatory pattern of the waters off southern California,
while the remaining flow continues south (1).
  The   increasing   urban,   suburban,  and   industrial
development  has  resulted  in  significant  pollution
problems   in   the   coastal  basin.   Thus,  the  local
municipalities  and   industries  have  turned   to  the
Southern  California  Bight for disposal  of liquid, and
some solid, waste  materials.  The high mountain ranges,
that run parallel to the coastline approximately  100km
inland,  effectively trap air pollutants generated within
the  coastal basin,   and  facilitate  transport  of aerial
contaminants,  by  fallout  and  rainout,  and terrestrial
contaminants, by surface runoff, to the Bight.
  The  adjacent  marine ecosystem of the Bight is  a major
recipient of the wastes produced in the highly urbanized
coastal basin. In this paper we will  discuss the  present
state of knowledge of the  trace  metal inputs  to the
                                                    Bight. We  will describe  the  nature  of  the various trace
                                                    metal  sources,  estimate the magnitudes of potential
                                                    sources and compare the significance of the  inputs. The
                                                    sources to be  discussed include  municipal  wastewater
                                                    discharges, discrete industrial and thermal  discharges,
                                                    surface  runoff,   vessel  protective  measures,  ocean
                                                    dumping, aerial inputs, and California current advective
                                                    transport.
                                                      Figure 2 shows  the  locations of marine  outfalls for
                                                    municipal wastewaters (W), discrete industrial discharges
                                                    (I), and cooling  waters from power  plants (P) in the
                                                    Southern California Bight. Figure 2 also shows the major
                                                    surface drainage  channels  along the southern California
                                                    coast.  Of these discrete sources, municipal wastewaters
                                                    have received the most attention in the past.

                                                    MUNICIPAL WASTEWATERS
                                                      At   present  approximately  1,000,000,000  gallons
                                                    (1000  mgd)  of treated  municipal   wastewaters  are
                                                    discharged daily through marine outfalls to the Southern
                                                    California  Bight. Most of  this, 84  percent, receives
                                                    primary  treatment  only.   Three  major   municipal
                                                    wastewater discharges to the Bight occur within about
                                                    30  km of Palos Verdes Peninsula (Figures 1  and 2).
                                                    Located off this  peninsula is the Joint Water Pollution
     POINT
   CONCEPTION
                                                         W9
                                                                 P10
                                             SANTA
                                           MONICA
                               POINT DUME
                                         BAY'",,,.
0^     UJ            ^
 ^>    <*\           ',-z-
 •*    ""'l           '\^
 ^  Al           \ ^
  0\!o--           •.'i
    A ^  LONG   \*
      J).;/VP2BEACH'^
      °X.P4*»    l28
                                     DANA
                                     POINT
W20
   «:    —
   O    a


   1/1  ^*'
  *s£(*^/
.. T.J,  .W 2 2
            PI1
                                W17 W18 W19  SAN MS
                                              CLEMENTE

                                                                                          <*••
                                                                                                   V
                        • THERMAL POWER  PLANT
                        ^INDUSTRIAL  WASTE DISCHARGER
                        OMUNICIPAL  DISCHARGER  0.
                             10
                                 20
                                	L_
                                      30
                                      40
                                     	L_
  50
  —i
                              KILOMETERS
        Figure 2.  Locations of discrete discharges (municipal wastewater, industrial and thermal discharges,
                  and surface runoff) to the Southern California Bight.

-------
                                                  TRACE METALS - MUNICIPAL/URBAN AREAS
                                                                   23
 Control Plant (JWPCP) outfall system (average length:
 1.5 miles) of Los  Angeles County Sanitation Districts,
 the largest of the municipal wastewater discharges in the
 Bight (370 mgd). To the northwest in Santa Monica Bay
 lie the  5 mile effluent and 7 mile digested sludge outfalls
 (335 and 5  mgd, respectively) of the Hyperion Sewage
 Treatment Plant  of  the  City  of Los Angeles; to the
 southeast lie the old  1  mile and  new 5 mile outfalls of
 Orange County Sanitation Districts (130 mgd). The City
 of San Diego (90 mgd) discharges through the Point
 Loma outfall  (2 miles); the City of Oxnard  (12  mgd)
 discharges approximately  one mile off  the  Ventura
 County coast. Altogether  these  five major dischargers
 contribute approximately 95 percent of the municipal
 wastewaters  discharged into  the  Southern California
 Bight.  These discharges occur  at  depths of  50 to 100
 meters, generally below the thermocline.
   Trace  metal  monitoring  programs  by the  major
 dischargers were established prior to, or during, 1971.
 This has enabled us to  complete a reliable estimate of
 trace  metal  mass  emission rates  from  municipal
 wastewater discharges to  the  Bight for  1971. Table 1
 shows  the  1971  average  concentrations  of  ten  trace
 metals:  silver, cadmium,  chromium, copper, mercury,
 nickel,  lead, zinc,  iron, and manganese as reported by
 the major discharges.* It is to be  noted that a variety of
 collecting, compositing, and analytical procedures were
 employed  in  the  dischargers'  routine  monitoring
 *The 1971 average concentrations  of total suspended solids
 (mg/1)  in the final effluents of these wastewater dischargers
 are: Oxnard — 80; Hyperion effluent — 73; Hyperion sludge —
 3,000; JWPCP - 330; Terminal Island  - 120; O.C.S.D. - 145-
 Pt. Loma - 110.
                 programs. Figure 3 shows, as an example, the monthly
                 variation of zinc concentrations in wastewater discharge.
                 These time variations are  typical of those for the other
                 metals studied,  and  illustrate  that,  while  individual
                 monthly values can vary from the year-long mean by a
                 factor of two or occassionally three, order-of-magnitude
                 deviations are uncommon.
                   In order  to evaluate the intercomparability of these
                 concentration  values  reported   by  the  various
                 laboratories,  we conducted  a short  term trace  metal
                 survey in the summer of  1971. With the assistance of
                 plant personnel, week-long composite samples at each of
                 the  five  major  treatment  plants were collected. Grab
                 samples were  collected by  the regular  procedures at one
                 or two hour intervals  for seven consecutive days. Every
                 day these samples  were filtered by 0.45-micron filters,
                 and the residues and filtrates  were frozen along with the
                 unfiltered replicates. At the end of the collection period
                 the  water  samples were  thawed  and combined  into
                 weekly  composites which were immediately refrozen.
                 The filtrate composites and daily residues were analyzed
                 by atomic absorption  spectrometry at the University of
                 California,  San  Diego.f   Unfiltered  composites  were
                 submitted to  the treatment plant laboratories for trace
                 metal determination.
                   The results of this  survey  indicated generally good
                 agreement between those metal concentrations reported
                 by the treatment plant laboratories and the University of

                 fThis study was conducted in  collaboration with J. Galloway,
                 University of California,  San Diego.
               TABLE 1  AVERAGE CONCENTRATIONS OF TRACE METALS (mg/8) IN FINAL
                         EFFLUENTS OF MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGERS, 1971
  Discharger    mgd  Silver

                                         Chro-
      Copper Mercury   Nickel  Lead   Zinc   Iron
                                        Manga-
                                         nese
                                      Remarks
                                   (note exceptions
                                    in footnotes)
W9 Oxnard
W10 Hyperion
               12
               x
                          0.02
                          0.00
0.06
0.02
0.09  <.001
0.01
0.06
0.01
                                                                   <.06
0.28   0.50
0.08   0.18
0.12
0.01
Avg. of Jan'71 &
Mar '72 values
Effluent

Sludge
Wll JWPCP

W12 Terminal
Island
W16 Orange
Co. San. Dist.
W24 Pt. Loma

335
X
5
X
371
X
8
X
130
X
90
X
sx

0.002f 0.05
0.001 0.02
0.03 f 0.23
0.003 0.05

0.02 0.03
0.03 0.002

0.002/ 0.01
0.00 0.01
0.02 0.06
0.01 0.01

0.02
0.01

0.006
0.002
0.03
0.005

—

<.006
.006
-

—
*A11 cobalt concentrations are averages of 24-hr composite s;
-{•Hyperion effluent and sludge silver concentrations are aven

0.29
0.07
2.1
1.3

0.86
0.03

0.11
0.01
0.22
0.06

0.15
0.04

0.23 0.003
0.03 0.001
12 0.10
1.6 0.01

0.56 0.001
0.03 0.0001

0.26 0.001
0.12 0.001
0.35 0.001 #
0.003

0.16 <.001
0.03
imples collected 24 Aug. and 9 Sept.
iges of 4 monthly values; effluent mi

0.28
0.04
2.6
0.33

0.24
0.01

0.42
0.16
0.16
0.03

0.06
0.01
70.
inganese

0.06
0.02
0.51
0.15

0.25*
0.04

0.00
0.00
0.22
0.06

0.10
0.01

0.46
0.07
16
2.1

2.4
0.11

0.36
0.14
0.54
0.12

0.18
0.02

0.73
0.09
47
8.8

9.9
0.63

0.94
0.04
1.2
0.33

—
concentration is average of 1 1

O.Olf
0.01
1.6
0.78

0.13
0.01

0.05
0.05
0.09
0.03

^
monthly values.

Avg. of 12 monthly
values
Avg. of 1 2 monthly
values

Avg. of 12 monthly
values

Avg. of Jan. & July
values
Avg. of Oct.-Dec.
values

Avg. of July— Sept.
values

      lead concentration is average of 10 monthly values.
/Terminal Island silver concentration is average of Aug. and Sept. 71 values.
$Drange Co. mercury concentration is estimated from analysis of 22 grab samples, 15-21 J un 72.

-------
24
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
                                     Zn
     3.0 -
 O
 5.   2.0

 Z
 LU
 D
      1.0
               \/
                         \/*?»';D--...'...,...--•"
                                           30
                                                O
                                                s
     O
20   Q
     Z>
                                                Z
                                                O
                                           10
                                                a.
                                                >-
                                                X
         J  FMAMJ  JASOND
                       1971

Figure 3.  Concentrations of zinc observed during  1971
         in  municipal wastewaters of the major treat-
         ment  plants  along  the  southern  California
         coast. Solid  circles indicate  concentrations
         measured in  one-week  composites of  these
         wastewaters (2).
                                                       California, San Diego (2). The ratios of the two reported
                                                       values usually were within a factor of two, and no trends
                                                       were apparent. For those concentrations not reported by
                                                       the  treatment plants, comparisons between Galloway's
                                                       data  and the  regular monitoring data for the closest
                                                       collection period usually still showed  a ratio of three or
                                                       less. Figure 3 illustrates such comparisons for zinc.
                                                         Table  2 presents the percentages of trace metals that
                                                       were found to be associated with the residue portions of
                                                       the effluent samples. Although particles of smaller than
                                                       0.45-microns may be retained by the filter, the results
                                                       do indicate  a high degree of association between most of
                                                       the  metals  and  the  wastewater solids.  For silver,
                                                       cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, zinc, and iron, 84 to
                                                       94 percent  of the  metals  were associated  with  the
                                                       residue.  For cobalt, nickel, and manganese, these values
                                                       range from 42 to 54 percent.
                                                         Although  the  data  listed  in Table  1   indicate
                                                       considerable differences in average metal concentrations
                                                       between the  various  wastewaters, the  concentrations
                                                       found on the wastewater particulates  agreed much more
                                                       closely,  as  is seen in Table 3. For example, the average
                                                       1971 metal concentrations (mg/1) in  Hyperion effluent
                                                       were generally 5  to  50 times lower  than those in the
                                                       digested sludge; however, on  a particulate basis (mg/dry
                                                       kg),  the effluent  concentrations in the composited
                                                       effluent  residue were generally only two to three times
                                                       lower than those in the sludge residue. It is apparent that
                                                       particulates  play an important  role in the wastewater
                                                       transport of trace metals.
                   TABLE 2  PERCENT OF TRACE METAL RETAINED BY 0.45-MICRON
                             FILTERS IN ONE-WEEK COMPOSITES OF FINAL EFFLUENT
                             FROM MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGERS, SUMMER,
                             1971 (After Reference 2)
Discharger
(data sampled)
W9 Oxnard
(8/15-8/21)
W10 Hyperion
Effluent
(7/26-8/1)
Wll JWPCP*
(8/13-8/19)
W16 Orange County
(8/27-9/2)
W24 Point Loma
(8/1 --8/7)
X
Silver
87

75


95

97

85

88
Cad-
mium
92

88


95

98

91

93
Cobalt
50

50


72

	

42

54
Chro-
mium
90

64


95

81

90

84
Copper
91

86


96

94

90

91
Nickel
80

35


45

57

74

58
Lead
92

90


97

97

92

94
Zinc
94

86


91

94

94

92
Iron
90

80


91

93

91

89
Manga-
nese
40

34


60

44

30

42
            thit -,™,  m ,  i  on?'  r ••""" •«• ' "i "rum monuormg oata ot Los Angeles county Sanitation Distri
            that approximately 90^ of the total mercury in JWPCP final effluent was retained on a 0.8-micron filter

-------
                                               TRACE METALS - MUNICIPAL/URBAN AREAS
                                                                                                      25
    TABLE 3  TRACE METAL CONCENTRATIONS (mg/dry kg) IN WASTEWATER PARTICULATES* AND
              NATURAL MARINE SEDIMENTS OFF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA (After Reference 2)

W9 Oxnard
W10 Hyperion
Effluent
Sludge
Wl 1 JWPCP
Wl 6 Orange County
W24 Point Loma
Natural Nearshore
Marine Sediment
Silver
30
130
265
32
40
105

1.0
Cad-
mium
115
108
180
65
245
65

0.4
Cobalt
15
4
23
8
-
8

7.2
Chro-
mium
350
1440
3430
1700
1330
1000

46
Copper
1000
1500
2500
1120
1850
1600

16
Nickel
145
520
670
220
220
310

14
Lead
300
320
1000
570
920
545

8.5
Zinc
1500
2300
4820
4100
2330
3000

63
Iron
9000
5400
13000
20000
7000
10000

25000
Manga-
nese
140
108
156
150
120
200

320
    *Residue after filtration through 0.45-micron Millipore filter.

  Table 4 presents the estimated annual trace metal mass
emission rates from municipal wastewater discharges  to
the Southern California Bight.* This estimate indicates
that approximately  95  percent  of the trace  metals
carried  by municipal  wastewaters into the  Southern
California  Bight   are   discharged  from  a  coastline
approximately 70  km in length.  From a broad-scale
point of view, the trace metal inputs  from municipal
wastewater  to the  Bight  may  be considered as a
semi-point  source  centered  around  the Palos Verdes
Peninsula.
DISCRETE INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGES
  In contrast  to  the case for  municipal wastewaters,
where a few major discharges contribute  most  of the
waste  input,  the  situation  for  discrete  industrial
discharges  is  much  more  complex.  The  types   of
industrial  processes  and reclamation  steps, if any,
employed can  play a vital role in the total quantity of a
particular trace metal that is  released in the discharge,
irregardless of the volumetric flow rates. The first step in
evaluating the importance of this source of trace metals
to the Bight was to categorize the discharges in terms of
the type  of waste generated, the  flow rate, and the
location of the discharge. These data were obtained from
the files of the  local Regional Water  Quality Control
Boards,  the state regulatory agencies for waste discharge
into the waters of southern California.
  Tabulations of such data for thermal cooling water
and petroleum-related discharges along the  coast are
presented in Tables 5 and 6. No significant data on the
concentration of trace metals in these discharges were
located during the inventory compilation.!
  One of the highly industrialized regions of the coast is
the San  Pedro  Bay  area. This is the  site of  Los
Angeles-Long Beach Harbor, and  is located just to the
southeast  of Palos Verdes Peninsula. In addition to the
*The  corresponding input rate for total suspended solids is
 estimated to be 278,000 M tons/yr.
fAn extensive analysis of the nature of thermal discharges to
 the Bight already has been presented elsewhere (3).
     TABLE 4  TRACE METALS MASS EMISSION RATES (M tons/yr) FROM MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER
               DISCHARGERS TO THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BIGHT, 1971
Discharger
W9 Oxnard
W10 Hyperion
Effluent
Sludge
Wll JWPCP
Wl 2 Terminal
Island
Wl 6 Orange Co.
W24 Point Loma
TOTAL
Flow
(mgd)
12
335
5
371

8
130
90
950
Silver
-
0.9
0.2
10

-
3.6
-
15
Cad-
mium
0.3
23
2
15

0.1
11
2.5
54
_ Chro-
Cobalt mium
1
2.8 130
0.2 10
440

1
40
19
3.0 640
Copper
1
110
80
290

3
63
20
570
Mer-
cury
-
1.4
0.7
0.5

-
0.2
0.1
2.9
Nickel
1
130
18
120

5
29
8
310
Lead
-
28
4
130

-
40
12
210
Zinc
4
210
110
1220

4
97
22
1700
Iron
8
340
320
5100

11
220
-
6000
Manga-
nese
2
5
11
67

1
16
-
100

-------
 26
CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
                          TABLE 5  ANNUAL DISCHARGE OF COOLING WATER
                                     FROM THE MAJOR POWER GENERATING
                                     STATIONS ON THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
                                     COAST
                                    Generating
                                      station
                                                            Flow
                                                        (108 cu m/yr)
                         FOSSIL-FUEL
                         L. A. Dept. of Water and Power
PI Harbor — Wilmington
P2 Haynes — Seal Beach
P3 Scattergood - Playa del Key
Subtotal
Southern California Edison Co.
P4 Alamitos - Seal Beach
P5 El Segundo — El Segundo
P6 Huntington — Huntingdon Beach
P7 Long Beach — Long Beach
P8 Mandalay — Oxnard
P9 Redondo - Redondo Beach
PI 0 Ormond — Ormond Beach
Subtotal
San Diego Gas and Electric Co.
PI 1 Encino - Carlsbad
PI 2 Silver Gate - San Diego Bay
PI 3 South Bay - San Diego Bay
PI 4 Station "B" - San Diego Bay
Subtotal
NUCLEAR
PI 5 San Onofre - San Clemente
TOTAL
1.1
10.5
2.5
14.1
11.6
5.0
6.5
0.8
3.2
9.8
10.2
47.1
2.2
2.2
5.0
0.9
10.3
5.5
77.0
 extensive  recreational,  commercial  and  naval  vessel
 activities there, San Pedro Bay  receives more than 150
 discrete industrial waste discharges, either directly into
 the bay or via storm drains (see  Table 7). The combined
 flow rate  of these discharges, excluding cooling waters
 from power plants, is  about  100  mgd, or about  10
 percent that  of  the  combined  municipal  wastewater
 discharges to  the Bight. Approximately 10,000 metric
 tons per year of suspended  solids are carried into the
 bay; this is  about 3 percent of the total figure for the
 combined municipal wastewaters.  As for the coastal
 industrial  discharges, no significant data on trace metal
 concentrations in industrial discharges to the bay were
 located. As is seen in the table, the combined flow rate
 for metallic industrial discharge (3.8 mgd) constitutes
 only about 4 percent of the total industrial discharge to
 the bay. However, the significance of this low percentage
 should  not   be  over emphasized.  The  lack  of any
 significant trace  metal  data  in the public files for  the
industrial discharges described above represents a serious
gap in  the  knowledge of trace metal  inputs to  the
Southern California Bight.
                                          SURFACE RUNOFF
                                            There  are  200  to  300  surface  runoff  discharge
                                          locations along  the southern California coast.  However,
                                          approximately 70 percent of the average annual flow is
                                          carried by  15 major streams during the storm runoff
                                          season. The normal annual precipitation in the southern
                                          California coastal basin  averages approximately 40 cm
                                          (15 in.),  and  surface runoff from about 60 percent of
                                          the drainage area is regulated by dams and other flood
                                          control  measures.   The  southern  California coastal
                                          streams generally carry appreciable flow only during and
                                          shortly following the occasional rainstorms.
                                            In an attempt to characterize the surface runoff in the
                                          southern  California  basin, five  major watersheds were
                                          selected for study during the storm season  of 1971 to
                                          72. These were the Santa Clara River,  Ballona Creek, the
                                          Los Angeles, Santa  Ana,  and  San  Luis Rey Rivers
                                          (Figure 2).
                                            In   light   of   the  apparent   association   of  trace
                                          constituents with particulates, a  survey was made on the
                                          relationship between flow  rate  and concentration of
                                          suspended sediment in southern California storm runoff.

-------
                         TRACE METALS - MUNICIPAL/URBAN AREAS
27
TABLE 6  DISCRETE INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGERS OF THE SOUTHERN
        CALIFORNIA COAST

11

12
13

14

15

16

17
18

19
110

111
112
113
114
115
116
117

118
119
120

121
122

123

124
125
126

127

128

129
Discharger
Phillips Petroleum - Point
Conception
Texaco, Inc. — San Augustin
Getty Oil - Gaviota

Shell Oil - El Capitan

Signal Oil & Gas - EUwood

Atlantic Richfield - Coal
Oil Point
Standard Oil — Summerland
Standard Oil — Carpinteria

Atlantic Richfield — Rincon
Atlantic Richfield — Rincon
Island
Western Oil & Dev. - Rincon
Petrol Industries — Rincon
Continental Oil — Rincon
Norris Oil Co. — Rincon
Phillips Petroleum — La Conchita
Phillips Petroleum — Punta Garda
Mobil Oil - Sea Cliff

Continental Oil - Pitas Point
Continental Oil — Grubb Lease
Getty Oil - Ventura

Standard Oil - McGrath Beach
McDonnell Douglas Corp. -
Venice
Standard Oil - El Segundo

Standard Oil - Island Esther
Union Oil — Platform Eva
Signal Oil and Gas - Platform
Emmy
Signal Oil and Gas - Huntington
Beach
Standard Oil - Huntington
Beach
Gulf Oil - Huntington Beach
Type of waste
Oil brine
Tanker ballast
Oil brine
Oil brine
Tanker ballast
Oil brine
Tanker ballast
Oil brine
Tanker ballast
Oil brine

Oil brine
Oil brine
Tanker ballast
Oil brine
Oil brine

Oil brine
Oil brine
Oil brine
Oil brine
Oil brine
Oil brine
Oil brine
Tanker ballast
Oil brine
Oil brine
Oil brine
Tanker ballast
Oil brine
Cooling tower
bleedoff
Cooling water
Refinery wastes
Oil brine
Oil brine
Oil brine

Oil brine

Oil brine

Oil line ballast
Flow
(mgd)
0.2

0.2
0.16

0.2

0.29

0.06

0.4
0.4

0.01
0.04

0.36
0.01
0.49
0.05
0.36
0.4
0.18

0.27
0.75
0.06

0.14
0.65


72
1
0.02
0.08

0.6

0.8

0.01

-------
28
           CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
      TABLE 7  COMBINED FLOW RATES (mgd) OF DISCRETE INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISCHARGERS
                IN THE SAN PEDRO BAY AREA
Discharge area
L. A. Harbor
Long Beach Harbor
Dominguez Channel
L. A. River Tidal Prism
Los Cerritos Channel
San Gabriel River
Tidal Prism
TOTAL
Oil field
brine
0.43
24
0.05
5.9

3.4

34
Oil line
and tanker
ballast
0.82
5.7
-
-
-
—

6.5
Refinery
& petro-
chemical
28
-
6.5
1.1
-
—

36
Metallic
2.0
0.03
1.4
-
0.12
0.19

3.8
Fish
cannery
9.6
-
-
—
-
-

9.6
Miscel-
laneous
chemical
5.6
3.8
2.3
-
0.04
—

12
Total
47
34
10
7
0.2
3.6

102
Data were provided  by the  United  States  Geological
Survey  from  studies  conducted  during January and
February,  1969. Typical examples of the relationship
that  was  found  for  this abnormally wet  year  are
illustrated for the Santa Clara River and the  Santa Ana
River in Figures 4 and 5, respectively.
  It is seen that, over the four day periods, peaks in the
concentration of suspended sediment  clearly correlate
with peaks in the flow rate. The peak amplitudes often
are  roughly   proportional; this  relationship,  where
   9    140,000 -
                                            applicable,  has  significant  implications  for programs
                                            aimed at the determination of mass  emission rates of
                                            particulate-associated   materials.   For   when   the
                                            concentration (Q) is proportional to the flow rate (Fj),
                                            e.g. Q = kFj, the transport rate (T)  of the  suspended
                                            substance increases as the square of the flow rate:
                                                    T =
=  kSFj2
                                                         i= 1
                                                                                         (1)
   z
   o
   OL
   h—
   Z
   UJ
   U
   Z
   o
 120,000 -
 100,000 -
  80,000 -
   O
   OL
                                                                SANTA CLARA  RIVER
                                                            SUSPENDED  SEDIMENT  (MG/L)
  60,00t> -


  40,000 -


  20,000 -


  10,000                                                            	
       0000  0800   1600   0000  0800   1600  0000  0800  1600  0000  0800  1600

             24-1-69             25-1-69             26-1-69              27-1-69

Figure 4  Comparison of discharge rate and suspended sediment concentration as a function of time
         in Santa Clara  River storm runoff during January 24 to 27, 1969.

-------
                                                TRACE METALS - MUNICIPAL/URBAN AREAS
                                                   29
      140,000
  ^  120,000
  O
  s
  z
  O
  CL
  \—
  Z
      100,000
       80,000
  2    60,000
  O

       40,000
       20,000

e B 	
SUSPENDED SEDIMENT (MG/L)-— ^M SANTA ANA RIVER


A
•
3
i •
H
*
1 :
• •
- ||
/x
•
. X
/x*
*
A'X
•i i
r x:
k'x'U
•: 1 x.



DISCHARGE (CFS)
*/
i''-
1 -
\ A'x
H /V
*.
'A
\
\i" // \
t :
. 1 x

i \i
\:
' V. /•
^ • "x -o< ~
'xc>\\ */"\
• \H f ^
v-<:i
tv. //

'x.xx

iii i i i i i i
20,000

18,000
16,000


14,000

12,000

10,000
8000
6000

4000

2000









2
u
«
SCHARI
Q





                  1200   2000 0400  1200  2000  0400  1200  2000 0400  1200   2000
                23-2-69
                                     24-2-69
                                                         25-2-69
                       26-2-69
        Figure 5. Comparison of discharge rate and suspended sediment concentration as a function of time
                 in Santa Ana River storm runoff during February 23 to 26, 1969.
Under  such  conditions  most of  the  transport  of
particulate-borne substances occurs during the period of
peak  flow.  Sampling  frequency therefore should  be
greater at these times to more accurately determine the
total transport of the suspended material.
  In  order  that  representative  samples of the  storm
runoff and its suspended sediments would be collected, a
special depth-integrating sampler was constructed. This
sampler was patterned after the United States Geological
Survey  suspended  sediment  pint   sampler,  but  was
enlarged to  a  one gallon capacity to provide sufficient
sample for trace-level analyses. Other modifications also
were  made  to decrease the  chance  of contamination;
these will be reported in detail later. The collection
stations were over the centers of the channels at bridges
that were located as near to  the coast  as possible but
above  the  tidal prism.  As  soon  as  possible   after
collection, generally within a  few  hours, the  samples
were taken to our laboratory where they were filtered
through  0.45  micron filters. The filtrates and  residues
then were frozen until analyzed.
  In  this program, nine  time  series  were  obtained
covering up to three storms  in four channels. During
periods  of  peak  flow  samples were  collected  at
approximately  two-hour intervals. The  1971  to  1972
period was an unusually dry year; all the channels did
not flow at each storm,  and no significant flow occurred
in the San  Luis  Rey River and the southern streams
during the year. Thus, the total surface runoff, estimated
The corresponding input of suspended sediment (silt) to the Bight
  to be 242 x  106 cu m, including both storm and dry
  weather flow, was approximately 43 percent of the long
  term average  for the Bight.  Of the  167 x 106 cu m of
  storm flow to the Bight, during the year, approximately
  60 percent was covered in this sampling program.
    Analyses of  these  samples were conducted at the
  California Institute  of Technology (4).  Concentrations
  of  ten  trace  metals,  the  same  as  for municipal
  wastewaters,  were measured in the runoff filtrates and
  residues. Where necessary, concentration of the samples
  with ion exchange  resin  was employed, followed by
  measurement  using  atomic absorption spectroscopy.  A
  detailed analysis of  the data, including a comparison of
  individual metal inputs from the various basin types, is
  still  underway, and,  along  with  a  description  of
  analytical procedures will be reported later (4).
    An example of the results  for the total concentrations
  of silver, copper, and  lead  in storm  runoff  from Los
  Angeles River is presented in Figure 6, along with the
  flow rate and  concentration of  suspended  sediment.
  These  data illustrate  the general  correlation of peak
  values for flow rate, and  silt and metal concentrations
  that was observed during this study. Calculations of mass
  emission rates  for the ten  metals studied were  made
  from such concentration and flow rate data. Table 8 lists
  the estimates obtained to date for metal inputs  to the
  Bight from runoff during water year 1971 to  72.* Also
  listed are the average  values  for percent of trace metal
  associated with particulates  in the  runoff samples. In
is estimated to be  274,000 M tons/yr.

-------
30
           CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
   100,000
     10,000
  o
      1,000
        100
                                                         LOS ANGELES RIVER
                            \
                              \
                                       \

                             \
                            •\\
          \\
                                     -
                                      x\
                                                                                            1000
                                                                                             00
                                                                o

                                                                o
                                                                                                u
                                                                                                z
                                                                                                o
                                                                                            10
              0400
0800
1200
                                          1600
                            2000
                                                            0000
                                     0400
0800
         1200
                          22-12-71
                                                                        23-12-71
        Figure 6. Concentrations of three trace metals and suspended sediment (silt) in the discharge (flow)
                 of Los Angeles River during December 22 to 23, 1971.
 general, these input rates were considerably lower than
 those  for  municipal wastewaters  during  1971.  For
 example,  surface  runoff  inputs  during  the  year
                              constituted  the  following  percentages  of the 1972
                              municipal wastewater  inputs of metals  to the  Bight:
                              silver, 6.7 percent; cadmium, 1.9 percent; chromium, 3.8

-------
                                                TRACE METALS - MUNICIPAL/URBAN AREAS
                                                                                                         31
   TABLE 8  ESTIMATED TRACE METAL MASS
              EMISSION RATES (M tons/yr) FROM
              SURFACE RUNOFF TO THE
              SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BIGHT,
              1971-72
Metal
Silver
Cadmium
Cobalt
Chromium
Copper
Mercury
Nickel
Lead
Zinc
Iron
Manganese
Mass emission
rate
1.1
1.2
5.3
25
18
0.06
17
90
100
26000
180
%
particulate*
74
78
75
82
59
63
89
74
99
72
  *Percent of metal retained by 0.45-micron filter.


percent;  copper,  3.2  percent;  mercury, 3.3  percent;
nickel, 5.5 percent; zinc, 5.9 percent. Only for lead (43
percent), cobalt (170 percent), iron (430 percent), and
manganese  (180  percent)  were  the  runoff inputs
relatively important.
DIFFUSE SOURCES
  In  addition  to  the discrete  or point  sources of
pollutants which have been discussed  previously, there
are a number of potentially significant pollutants whose
sources to the Bight are distributed widely and thus are
much more difficult to quantitate. Four such pollutant
sources   are   vessel   antifouling  paint   and   fuel
comsumption,  ocean  dumping,  airborne inputs,  and
advective  transport by the California current. Although
these  source  categories  have  not been investigated
thoroughly, preliminary  analyses  were conducted to
provide a  rough estimate of possible importance of these
sources and to  assist in establishing priorities for future
studies. The following  data on inputs from diffuse
sources are order-of-magnitude  estimates only and are
presented  here  primarily to provide guidance for future
studies.
VESSEL  BODY   PROTECTIVE  MEASURES AND
FUEL COMSUMPTION
  The Southern California Bight harbors a large number
of recreational, commercial, and naval  vessels. Losses of
bottom antifouling paint  and anticorrosive anodes and
spent fuel residues may represent important sources of
trace pollutants to the marine environment.
  To investigate  the  magnitude  of  these  potential
sources  of  pollutants,   a  preliminary   survey  of
recreational vessel  activity  was  undertaken.  The  two
major objectives of this investigation were to inventory
the  recreational craft in each  of the fourteen major
marinas between  Santa  Barbara and San Diego, and to
obtain preliminary information on the consumption, and
presumed release  to the Bight, of certain materials such
as antifouling paint, sacrificial zinc anodes, and leaded
fuel  in one of the largest recreational  vessel facilities,
Marina  del  Rey  in  Los  Angeles.  Estimates  of  the
quantities of trace metals used in bottom paints and in
spent fuel in Marina del Rey  could  be  extrapolated to
estimate annual marina-related input of these metals to
the Bight.

Antifouling Paints and Primers
  The largest drydock  in Marina del Rey, Windward
Yacht and Repair, was studied to obtain an estimate of
the use of antifouling paints. Of the 5,500 recreation
craft  in the  marina^ nearly 1,200 are hauled out and
painted annually.  Fifty to 60 gallons of antifouling paint
are applied weekly; the old paint is removed and washed
through  a storm drain into the  marina. Thus, this
drydock uses approximately 2,860 gallons of antifouling
paint annually, which corresponds to about 2.4 gallons
per boat. Based  on this analysis, it is  estimated that
approximately 13,000  gallons of  antifouling paint are
applied annually  to the recreational craft moored in
Marina  del Rey.  Assuming that  vessel  activity in  the
marina is typical of recreation craft in the marinas of the
Bight, and extrapolating this unit paint consumption, it
is estimated that the annual antifouling paint  require-
ment  for  the  34,850  recreation  craft in the  Bight
area  is  approximately 84,000  gallons. A gallon  of
antifouling paint  weighs  about 8.6 kg, which results in
an   estimated  total  annual  paint  usage  rate   of
approximately 720,000 kg for recreational craft.
  In a recent study conducted by San Diego Regional
Water  Quality Control Board (5) Barry estimated that
the annual paint usage for commercial and naval vessels
at the major shipbuilding  and repair facilities in San
Diego   Bay  was   approximately  30,000  gallons   of
antifouling paint (8.6 kg/gal), 23,000 gallons of red lead
primer (5.2 kg/gal), and 10,000 gallons of zinc chromate
primer (4.1 kg/gal). It is estimated that,  at the most, 10
percent of the paints or  coatings  removed by  sand
blasting of commercial and naval vessels is lost to the bay
water. The bulk  of the sand and coating residues is
disposed of in land fills.
  Comparable  information  for  other   major  harbor
facilities, such as  the Los Angeles-Long Beach Harbor, is
not yet available. If one assumes that  San Diego Bay
practices  are representative of  commercial and  naval
vessels generally,  then  the annual loss of antifouling
paints and primers to the Bight is  estimated to  be as
follows: Antifouling paint, 52,000 kg; red  lead primer,
24,000 kg; zinc primer, 8,200 kg.
  Estimation  of the concentrations of trace constituents
in antifouling paints and primers  is  difficult; however,
the results from the Marina del Rey survey  indicate that
antifouling paints typically contain  between 35  to  78

-------
32
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
                         TABLE 9  ESTIMATED TRACE METAL COMPOSITION OF
                                   ANTIFOULING PAINT AND PRIMERS
Type
Antifouling paint


Zinc chromate primer

Read lead primer
Trace
metal
Copper
Mercury
Arsenic
Zinc
Chromium
Lead
Average concentration
(%)
50
0.5*
0.2f
45
12
25
                        *Assuming that mercury content of mercury paints is 5% and that
                         mercury paints comprise 10%of total paint usage.
                        t Assuming that arsenic content of arsenic paints is 2% and that
                         arsenic paints comprise 10% of total paint usage.
percent  cuprous oxide  (31  to 69 percent as  copper).
Although the use of mercury compounds in marine paint
was  banned  recently  by  the  U.  S.  Environmental
Protection  Agency, some paints  containing  about  7
percent  mercury phenate and 3 percent yellow oxide of
mercury and unspecified  concentrations of arsenic are
still being sold.
  Based  on  Barry's   report,  it  is  estimated  that
antifouling paints contain, by weight, up to 67 percent
cuprous   oxide,  3.4  percent  mercury phenate,  1.3
percent  mercury oxide, and 1.7 percent phenarsazine
chloride  (zinc   compound).  In  addition,   primers,
apparently used mostly on  the larger commercial  and
naval vessels, may contain  up to 45 percent  zinc, 12
percent  chromium (as  zinc  chromate), and 25 percent
lead (red lead primer).
  From  the limited information available, estimates have
been made of the average  trace metal  concentrations of
antifouling paints  and primers (Table 9).  Using  the
foregoing estimated concentrations of trace metals, the
annual input of such materials from  these sources has
been estimated and are reported in Table 10.
                                                   Zinc Anodes

                                                     The  use  of  sacrificial  anodes to  control  galvanic
                                                   corrosion provides another source of trace metals to the
                                                   Bight.  Investigations at Marina  del Rey indicate  that
                                                   about 90 percent of the sail  and power craft harbored
                                                   there employ zinc anodes to control galvanic corrosion.
                                                   It is estimated that each boat uses approximately 4 to 5
                                                   kg of zinc per year for this purpose. Thus, it is estimated
                                                   that about  160 metric  tons  of zinc per  year are
                                                   contributed  to the Bight from the use of zinc anodes,
                                                   most of which go into the marina harborage areas.
                                                     Data furnished by Bunker Hill, Inc., a major supplier
                                                   of anode material, indicate that zinc anodes also contain
                                                   approximately 0.05  percent  cadmium, implying  that
                                                   approximately 0.1  metric  tons  per year of cadmium
                                                   enter the Bight from this source.
                                                     It should be noted that the foregoing estimates do not
                                                   consider   the   sacrificial   anode  contribution  from
                                                   commercial  and naval vessels because of the lack of
                                                   specific information on this source. Hence the estimates
                                                   appear to be quite conservative.
 TABLE 10  ESTIMATED TRACE METAL MASS EMISSION RATES (M tons/yr) FROM RECREATIONAL,
	COMMERCIAL AND NAVAL VESSELS TO THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BIGHT*

                                           Cadmium   Chromium    Copper    Mercury    Lead    Zinc
         Source
 Gross
tonnage
 Recreational vessels
  Antifouling paint
  Zinc anode
  Fuel
                       720
                       160
             1.4
                                             0.1
                                               360        3.6
                                                                                                160
                                                                                         3.5
Commercial and naval
Vesselsf
Antifouling paint
Zinc chromate primer
Red lead primer
TOTAL


52
8.2
24



0.1
	 	
— —
1.5 0.1


26
1 _

1 390


0.3

	
3.9




6
9.5



4.1

160
  tNo estimates for gross tonnage of zinc anodes and fuel used.

-------
                                               TRACE METALS - MUNICIPAL/URBAN AREAS
                                                                                          33
Leaded Fuel
  Union  Oil Company, which operates the only  fuel
dock at Marina del Rey, reports its annual fuel sales of
about  440,000 gallons  of low-lead gasoline (containing
0.5 gm Pb/gallon) and  110,000 gallons of high octane
gasoline  (containing  3  gm  Pb/gallon).  Thus,  the
consumption of these fuels results in the release of about
0.55 metric  tons  of lead per  year  to the Bight  from
Marina del Rey  fueled  craft. If these fuel consumption
and lead release  data are applied to all recreational craft
moored hi the Marinas of the Southern California Bight,
an  input  of lead to the Bight  of approximately 3.5
metric tons per year is obtained.
Trace Material Mass Emission Rates
  Table  10  presents a  summary of  the  annual mass
emission rates for trace metals reaching the Bight from
selected    sources   associated   with   recreational,
commercial, and naval vessel activity. It is  recognized
that some  of the  estimated inputs are crude; however,
they represent the best information available. Moreover,
it should be noted  that  the  estimated  vessel related
mercury input of 4  metric tons per year is greater than
the  total  input of  mercury  from  treated municipal
wastewater  and  surface  runoff.  The estimated vessel
related input of copper  (390  M  tons/yr) is  about
two-thirds  of the  corresponding copper input to the
Bight from municipal wastewater runoff.
                                        OCEAN DUMPING
                                          In an investigation of past ocean dumping practices,
                                        data on eight major types of wastes dumped from vessels
                                        into  the Bight  was reviewed.  These were:  (a) refinery
                                        wastes,  (b)  chemical  wastes, (c) filter cake, (d) oil
                                        drilling  wastes, (e) refuse and garbage, (f) radioactive
                                        wastes,  (g)  military explosives,  and (h) miscellaneous
                                        types of wastes.
                                          Figure 7  shows the location  within the Southern
                                        California Bight  of both  active  and  inactive  ocean
                                        dumping sites. Fourteen ocean  dumping sites, which were
                                        approved either by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers or
                                        by  the  California Regional  Water  Quality Control
                                        Boards,  have  been  designated   for  waste  dumping
                                        purposes since  1931. At present, dumping of various
                                        types of wastes at nine designated  sites is prohibited by
                                        regulatory agencies, and disposal  of military explosives
                                        at two other sites is still under  moratorium issued by the
                                        Department of Navy in 1971.
                                          Table  11  lists the  major  dumping sites, the total
                                        tonnage  dumped  during  various  periods,  and  the
                                        estimated present annual dumping rate for each type of
                                        waste.

                                        Refinery Wastes
                                          It  is  estimated  that approximately 480,000  metric
                                        tons of petroleum refining wastes were dumped between
                                        1946 and 1971, corresponding to an annual average of
                PT.
           CONCEPTION
                                                                              OIL DRILLING WASTES
                                                                              EXPLOSIVES
                                                                              FILTER  CAKE
                                                                              INDUSTRIAL
                                                                              RADIOACTIVE (CHEMICALS)  —
NORTH CHANNEL ISLANDS
                                                                             VESSEL REFUSE AND GARBAGE
                                                                                     ACTIVE SITE

                                                                                     INACTIVE SITE

                                                                                     PROPOSED SITE
                                                  E  '  SANTA
                                                      CATALIN A I.  ( V
                                                   SAN CLEMENTE  I.
   32° -
    121°
                         120°                 119°                 118°                 117°

                   Figure 7.  Locations of ocean dumping sites in the Southern California Bight.
                                                                                                       116"

-------
34
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
                    TABLE 11   SUMMARY OF WASTES DUMPED INTO THE SOUTHERN
                                CALIFORNIA BIGHT, 1931-71
Type of
waste
Refinery wastes
Chemical wastes

Filter cake
Oil drilling wastes
Refuse and garbage

Radioactive wastes
Military explosives
Miscellaneous wastes
Record
period
1946-71
1965-71
1947-71
1960-67
1969-70
1966-70
1931-71
1944^70
1947-68
1946-68
1945-70
Estimated total
during record
period
(M tons)
480,000
2,800
5,700
140
320,000
3,000,000
47,000
7,400
90,000
-
-
Estimated
present
tonnage*
(M tons/yr)
1,800
470
210
-
-
1,200
-
-
250
                     *Wastes for which no present tonnage estimate is given have been discontinued
                      (military explosives by moratorium).
about  18,000  metric  tons  per  year.  However,  the
reported  annual dumping rate has dropped to about
 1,800  tons per year since  1968. The principal dumping
site for refinery waste is in the San Pedro Channel. The
specific  composition   of  these  refinery wastes  are
unavailable; however, they are believed to include spent
caustic   solutions,   acid   sludges,  spent  catalysts,
petrochemical wastes,  and  chemical  cleaning wastes.
These  materials surely  must  include trace metals, trace
organics, and other  potentially  toxic substances,  but
quantitative information is not available.
Chemical Wastes
  This type  of  industrial waste  is dumped  either in
sealed  containers or in  bulk by tank barge, and includes
waste  material from  aerospace, heat-treating, plating,
film  processing,  chemical processing,  and  electronic
manufacturing firms, industrial, medical, and academic
laboratories, and military and other sources. Most of the
recorded bulk tonnage, 210 metric tons/yr since 1947, is
discharged  approximately  15 km east of Catalina Island.
Most  of the  containerized chemical wastes, 470 metric
tons/yr since  1965. have  been dumped in San Pedro
Channel. Between  1960 and  1967, approximately  140
metric tons of chemical  waste,  sodium cyanide, were
dumped in bulk 32 km west of Point Loma, However.
such dumping there has been prohibited since 1967.
Filter Cake and Oil Drilling Wastes
  Two types  of relatively  inert material, filter  cake, 70
percent fixed and  50 percent volatile solids, and  oil
drilling wastes, similar  to dredging spoils, were  dumped
to the Bight  in large amounts for a short period. Filter
cake, consisting of about  50  percent  perlite and 50
percent cellulose, is  used in extraction of algin  from
kelp, and  approximately  320,000  metric  tons  were
dumped about  15 km west of Point Loma during  1969
and  1970. More than 3 million metric tons of oil drilling
mud and cutting were dumped in the San Pedro Channel
between 1966 and 1970. These two  types of dumpings
have been prohibited and discontinued since 1970.
Refuse and Garbage
  Until recently, naval vessel refuse and garbage has been
dumped into the Bight. Between 1947 and 1968, an
estimated total of 90,000 metric tons were dumped in
the vicinity of the Coronado Islands, and between 1944
and  1970  an estimated total of 7,400 metric  tons were
dumped 40  km southeast of Catalina Island. However,
approximately 1,200 metric tons per year of refuse and
garbage from commercial vessels is still being dumped
approximately 16 km east of Catalina Island.
Other Types of Waste
  Between  1945 and  1970, undetermined quantities of
unspecified  military  explosives  and   toxic   chemical
ammunition have  been dumped in several designated
dumping sites in the Bight. Low-level radioactive wastes
also  have  been dumped  in the  authorized  locations
during the period of 1946 to 1968. Dumping of militaiy
explosives and  other wastes has been interrupted by a
moratorium issued by the Navy  in  1971.  Dumping of
radioactive   wastes  has  been  terminated  since  its
prohibition in 1968.
  Based on  information furnished by H-10 Water Taxi
Company, Los  Angeles, approximately 250 metric tons

-------
                                               TRACE METALS - MUNICIPAL/URBAN AREAS
                                                 35
per year of undefined miscellaneous wastes are dumped
in the Southern California Bight.
Trace Constituent Mass Emission Rates
  Although there has been an  attempt  to quantify the
distribution  and  amount of wastes  in  selected types
dumped into  the Bight, virtually nothing has been found
in  the public  record  regarding  the  concentration  of
specific pollutants  in  the  wastes dumped.  Thus, for
pollutants such as  trace metals, estimation of  mass
emission   rates  from  this  source  is  very  difficult.
Nevertheless,  order-of-magnitude  estimates  of  the
probable upper limits of such mass emission rates have
been  attempted. It appears  that only  refinery and
chemical  wastes  and  some  undefined miscellaneous
wastes currently  constitute any  significant  source  of
trace  pollutants to the Bight. As shown in Table 11, it is
estimated that approximately 1,800 metric tons per year
of  refinery waste and 1,000  metric  tons  per  year  of
chemical and miscellaneous wastes were dumped into
the Bight off Los  Angeles  and San Diego in 1971. It
seems reasonable to assume that, on  the average, these
wastes would not contain more than 0.5 to 1 percent, by
weight, of  any  one of the  trace constituents being
investigated   by  Southern  California  Coastal Water
Research Project, with the exception of iron and zinc. It
is likely that  these wastes might contain up to 2 percent
zinc and 10 percent iron. Owing to the value of mercury
and silver, upper limits for their average concentrations
are assumed to be an order-of-magnitude lower than the
general level  taken for most of the other metals. Based
on  these extremely  rough  assumptions,  upper  limit
estimates  of  present annual trace metal mass emission
rates are presented in Table 12.
AERIAL FALLOUT
  Limited data are available on aerial fallout rates of
trace  metals  to  the Bight.  This source is  difficult to
quantitate  for  several  reasons, including the  high
horizontal velocity compared to  the vertical velocity of
airborne  particles, the  diffuse nature of the source, the
relatively high constituent gradients that may exist near
the densely-populated  areas, and the large  area of the
Bight.

Rainfall Washout
  Several recent studies have provided some insight into
this subject. Estimates  of metal contributions from rain
falling directly on the Bight (6),  conducted on Catalina
Island  from  September  1966 to January  1967, are
shown in Table  13. The median metal  concentration
values  were used, and an average annual rainfall rate of
40 cm (15 in) over a Bight  area  of 100,000 sq km was
assumed.  It  should be noted that  these data  do not
include the contribution of metals to the Bight from dry
fallout.
  The  results of this rough estimate indicate, as seen in
the summary Table  15, that the mass emission rate of
lead  from direct  rainfall  washout  on  the  Bight is
significantly higher  than that from the discrete sources,
municipal wastewater  and  surface runoff.  The  mass
emission  rates of nickel  and iron from  direct  rainfall
washout, on  the  contrary, are much  lower than those
from  the discrete  sources  to the Bight. For copper,
                          TABLE 12  UPPER-LIMIT ESTIMATES OF TRACE METAL
                                      MASS EMISSION RATES TO THE SOUTHERN
                                     CALIFORNIA BIGHT FROM OCEAN DUMPING
Metal
Silver
Cadmium
Cobalt
Chromium
Copper
Mercury
Nickel
Lead
Zinc
Iron
Manganese
Assumed
maximum concentration
(% by wt)
0.05
0.5
0.5
1
1
0.05
1
1
2
10
1
Est. max.
mass emission
rate*
(M tons/yr)
1.5
14
14
28
28
1.5
28
28
56
280
28
                          "Based on estimated 1971 dumping tonnage of 1800 M tons/yr of
                           refinery wastes and 1000 M tons/yr of chemical and miscellaneous
                           wastes.

-------
36
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
                         TABLE 13  ESTIMATED TRACE METAL MASS EMISSION
                                    RATES FROM DIRECT RAINFALL ON THE
                                    SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BIGHT
Metal
Copper
Mercury
Nickel
Lead
Zinc
Iron
Manganese
Median concentration*
in rainwater
(Mg/e)
10
0.2
1
25
55
1
12
Mass
emission rate
(M tons/yr)
400
8
40
1000
2200
40
480
                         'From Reference 6.
mercury, zinc, and manganese, comparable amounts are
contributed from  rainfall washout and discrete sources.
Dry Fallout
  It is possible that the contribution of particulate-borne
materials to the Bight via dry fallout may exceed those
due to direct  rainfall  washout. For example, the fallout
rate  of lead  on dust particles  (24 mg Pb/m2-yr) was
about two to  three times as large as that  due to rainfall
(10 mg Pb/m2-yr) (7).  Isotopic analysis confirmed that
this lead was  not of soil origin, but that essentially all of
it  originated  in   the combustion of  leaded gasoline.
Extrapolation of the  La Jolla fallout rates to the entire
Bight yields annual lead input rates through  dry and wet
fallout of approximately 2,400 and  1,000 metric tons,
respectively. It is interesting to note that the latter value
is about the same  as that obtained by extrapolating the
Catalina Island rainfall data (6).
  In  1968, approximately 23,000 metric tons  of lead
were  combusted  in  gasoline  in  California (7).  It  is
probable that  at least half of this comsumption occurred
in southern   California. Thus, approximately  10,000
metric  tons  of   lead  are  released   annually  to the
atmosphere in this area. The previous data  suggest that
as much as one-third of this amount may  fall directly
into  the coastal waters, depending upon the degree to
which  fallout  rates at La Jolla and Catalina Island are
representative of fallout to the entire Bight.
ADVECTIVE  TRANSPORT
  At the regional  scale  considered here, a  potentially
significant but largely unevaluated source of trace metals
transported into  the  Southern  California Bight  is the
California current  which carries seawater  and associated
constituents into the Bight (Figure 1). The complex flow
pattern  keeps the  water in the Bight for  some  time,
during   which time  various  physical, chemical,  and
biological  processes  can  occur. These processes  may
result in the  retention  of significant amounts of some
constituents  in the Bight.  These processes may  also
result in the removal of significant  amounts of other
constituents from the Bight in the advective flow from
the Bight.
Mass Emission Rates
  The surface area of the Bight has been estimated to be
about 1 x 1011 sq m. Assuming the mixed surface layer
depth to be 50  m, the volume of the mixed layer of the
Bight is  computed to be 5  x 1012 cu m.  It has been
shown  that the mean residence time of water in the
mixed layer is on the order of 3  months (1). Thus the
advective flow rate of the California current is estimated
to be approximately 2 x 1013 cu m/yr.
  Assuming that the trace metal concentrations reported
for ocean waters are  representative of California current
waters, the mass transport rates of trace metals into the
Bight by the California  current are estimated to be as
shown  in Table  14.  Although the  role of the California

   TABLE  14  ESTIMATED TRACE METAL MASS
              TRANSPORT RATES TO THE
              SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BIGHT
              BY THE CALIFORNIA CURRENT
     Metal
                 Concentration
Mass transport rate
   (M tons/yr)
Silver
Cadmium
Cobalt
Chromium
Copper
Mercury
Nickel
Lead
Zinc
Iron
Manganese
0.3
0.1
0.4
0.2
3
0.03
7
0.3
10
3
2
6,000
2,000
8,000
4,000
60,000
600
140,000
6,000
200,000
60,000
40,000

-------
                                               TRACE METALS - MUNICIPAL/URBAN AREAS
                                                 37
current as a source of trace metals to the Bight may be
different from those of other  sources, the estimated
mass  transport rates of most of the trace metals  by
advective transport far outweigh the mass emission rates
from other sources. For example, the mass transport rate
of mercury by the California current  is estimated to be
about 600  metric tons per year,  which is about 30 times
the amount of mass emission rates of mercury from all
other sources to the Bight (8). However, for chromium,
lead,  and  iron, the annual advective transport rates
exceed  the sum  of the other, principally terrestrial
inputs by only a few factors. At least for chromium and
lead, whose terrestrial inputs are believed to be largely
anthropogenic, these inputs appear to be  a significant
perturbation to the natural mass  balance of metals in the
Bight.
  The circulation of marine waters off southern and Baja
California  is   such  that increased  levels of trace
constituents in the biota to the west and  south of the
densely populated southern California coastline  may in
fact be  due to sources  far to the north. For  example,
anomalously high  levels  of zinc—65 were found in the
coastal  mussel, Mytilus  califomianus, collected during
1963 to 64 from northern Baja  California, where the
California current  sweeps eastward and impinges on this
coast (9). The suggestion that this anomalous zinc—65
was being  carried  by the California current was  further
supported by increasing concentration of this radiometal
in  samples of the oceanic  gooseneck  barnacle, Lepas
anatifera,  collected  toward  the  west off  southern
California.  In contrast  to  zinc—65,  the other  two
radiometals measured,  cobalt—60 and manganese—54,
did  not  show  significant  differences between  the
nearshore of La Jolla and California current speciments.
The levels of these two nuclides also were approximately
constant in M.  californianus  from both  the  southern
California  and  Baja California stations.  This  argues
against nuclear  fallout  as the source of the anomalous
zinc-65, and suggest that the Columbia River effluent,
which  carried  approximately 55,000  pCi zinc—65 per
month into  the water  off Washington and Oregon, was
elevating zinc—65  concentrations in the marine biota
1,900 km to the south. Therefore, the dense population
center  off San Francisco, and  the  intense agricultural
activity in the  large central  valley  of California, both
may be important source regions of runoff and airborne
pollutants that are introduced into the California current
north of Point Conception. Any  such contaminants from
the  north could  contribute  to elevated levels in the
marine  biota  to  the west  and  south  of  southern
California.
  There  is  another   important aspect  of  possible
pollutant  transport  from the north. As  the California
current moves  slowly  down the coast  of California,
certain  trace constituents introduced into  the  surface
layer off Washington, Oregon, or  northern California
may be incorporated into  the  food  web.  If these
substances  are subject  to  trophic  or  feeding  level
concentration,  higher  levels  might  be  expected  in a
specified  organism  caught  off  southern California,
compared to levels observed in the same organism caught
to the north. Ocean current advection from the north
could play an important part in contributing to elevated
levels of certain pollutants in the biota off southern and
Baja California.

SUMMARY
  In Table  15  we  have  summarized  our estimates of
trace metal  annual mass emission rates to the Bight from
the  various sources   for  which sufficient  data are
available. Although  the values are not all  of comparable
reliability, and  several  potentially important modes are
not  quantified at all,  the summary  does  provide useful
insight into which  of the  input  modes studied are of
   TABLE 15  ESTIMATED TRACE METAL MASS EMISSION RATES (M tons/yr) FROM VARIOUS SOURCES
              TO THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BIGHT, 1971
Metal
Silver
Cadmium
Cobalt
Chromium
Copper
Mercury
Nickel
Lead
Zinc
Iron
Manganese
1
Municipal
wastewater
15
54
3
640
570
3
310
210
1,700
6,000
100
2
Surface
runoff
1
1
5
25
18
0.1
17
90
100
26,000
180
3
Dkect
rainfall
-
-
—
-
400
8
40
1,000
2,200
40
480
4
Vessel*
coating
-
0.1
—
1
390
4
-
10
160
-
—
5
Ocean dumping
maxima
2
14
14
28
28
2
28
28
56
280
28
6
Sum of col. 1
through 5
18
69
22
690
1,400
17
400
1,300
4,200
32,000
790
7
Advective
transport
6,000
2,000
8,000
4,000
60,000
600
140,000
6,000
200,000
60,000
40,000
  'Including vessel antifouling paints, primers, and spent fuel residues.

-------
38
             CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
 probable  importance.  For  example, of the estimated
 input  routes  of locally derived copper and mercury,
 municipal wastewater discharge, vessel antifouling paint,
 and direct rainfall  al]  appear to have about the  same
 importance. For zinc,  municipal wastewater and direct
 rainfalJ appear to predominate. In the  case  of lead, the
 surface runoff  input  is  the  same order  as  that  of
 municipal  wastewaters,  but  these sources  probably
 contribute an  order of magnitude less lead to the waters
 of  the Bight than does aerial fallout. Cobalt, iron, and
 manganese are the  only other trace metals studied that
 have  surface runoff inputs  of  approximately the  same
 importance as those of municipal wastewaters, and the
 inputs of these metals via  both modes  may be  more
 dependent  on  natural  than  anthropogenic  sources.
 However, for  silver, cadmium,  chromium,  and nickel,
 present data suggest that municipal wastewater discharge
 to  the Bight dominate all other locally-derived inputs.
 Clearly, more comprehensive and reliable information on
 the importance of  wet   and  dry fallout,  and  of
 vessel-protective  measures,  are  needed  in  the  above
 comparison. Further, the lack of any reliable estimates
 of  inputs  of  trace  metals  from  direct  industrial
 discharges  represents a major  deficiency in this  mass
 balance attempt. Correction  of these various  deficiencies
 probably should assume a higher priority than improving
 our knowledge  on the inputs from ocean dumping, as
 the present best estimates of probable maximum values
 suggest that only for cobalt does it appear likely that
 ocean  dumping  could  represent the major local source.
 With  the  exception  of chromium,  lead, and iron, for
 each of the trace metals studied the sum, see column 6,
 Table 15, of all  estimated yearly inputs eminating  from
 the coastal plain of the Bight is one to  two orders  of
 magnitude  below the estimated annual flux of the metal
 through the Bight via ocean current advection. Although
 this situation may be natural in the case of iron, the fact
 that local anthropogenic inputs of the other two metals
 are, to the first order  comparable to  that of  gross
 advection suggests  that chromium  and lead transport
 from   the  urban areas  may   represent  a  specially
 important perturbation of the natual metals budget for
 the regional ecosystem. However, it is difficult  to  draw
 any very  reliable conclusions from  the comparison  of
 local versus advective inputs  until more is known about
 the net addition of metals to, or removal from, the Bight
 due to bottom  sediment   interactions and to ocean
 circulation.  Further, the  physical-chemical  state  of  a
 metal  advected  into  the Bight  may  be significantly
 different from that injected via a particular local input
 mode.  In  addition  to  better data on input rates of a
 particular  trace metal to the  Bight, much more needs to
 be  learned about (a)  the  nature of the metal  being
 transported  to the local marine waters, (b) the changes
 that take place  in the  metal following introduction  to
 these   waters,   and  (c) the   transport  processes  and
eventual fate of the metal in the ocean ecosystem.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
  We  wish to  thank  the personnel  of Los  Angeles
County    Sanitation   Districts,   Hyperion   Sewage
Treatment Plant, Orange  County Sanitation Districts,
Point  Loma  Treatment  Plant,  and  Oxnard  Sewage
Treatment Plant for providing us with samples and data.
We also thank  the  California  Regional Water  Quality
Control Boards of the Los Angeles, Santa Ana, and San
Diego  Regions for assistance in surveying their records.
The cooperation  of the  Los  Angeles County  Flood
Control District and the United States Geological Survey
in  obtaining  runoff  samples  and  data  is gratefully
acknowledged. Many  metal concentrations in  surface
runoff  and municipal wastewaters were obtained in
collaboration with Professor James J. Morgan (California
Institute  of  Technology),  Dr.  James  N. Galloway
(University of  California, San  Diego),  and  Joseph
Johnson (Southern  California  Coastal  Water Research
Project). Runoff collections were executed by the firm
of Pomeroy, Johnston,  and Bailey. We thank  Robert
Brown for his assistance in the ocean dumping survey,
and  Chesley Reynolds and  Frank  Hoffman for  their
assistance  in  the   marina  investigation.  Technical
assistance in data gathering was  provided by Tung-Kan
Cheng,   Kimm   Crawford,   Eugene   Leong,  Carlos
Patrickson, Tom  Sarason,  Gerald  Shiller, Cindy Smith,
and Yuan  Yuan Tsai.  Robin Simpson and Deirdre Van
Hofwegen  provided  editorial  assistance.  Finally, we
thank  Professor  Erman  A.  Pearson  (University  of
California, Berkeley), Professor  John D. Isaacs (Scripps
Institution  of   Oceanography),  and  Philip  Storrs
(Engineering-Science, Inc.)  for their contributions to this
manuscript.
REFERENCES
I.Jones,   J.   H.,   General  circulation  and   water
     characteristics in the Southern California Bight, So.
     Calif. Coastal  Water  Research Project, TR  101,
     1971.
2. Galloway,  J.  N.,  Man's alteration  of the natural
     geochemical cycle of  selected trace metals, Ph.  D.
     dissertation, Univ. of Calif., San Diego, 1972.
3. Young, C., Thermal discharges into the coastal waters
     of southern California, So.  Calif. Coastal Water
     Research  Project, TR 102,1971.
4. Morgan, J. J., D. R. Young, and J. N. Galloway, Ten
     trace  metals   in   surface  runoff  of  southern
     California, in preparation.
5. Barry, J. N.,  Staff report on wastes associated with
     shipbuilding and repair facilities in San Diego Bay,
     Calif. Reg.  Water Qual. Control  Bd.,  San  Diego
     Region, 1972.
6. Lazrus,  A. L.,  E. Lorange, and J. P. Lodge, Jr.,  Lead
     and other metal ions in United States precipitation,
     Environ. Sci. & Tech., 4: 55-58, 1970.
7. Chow,  T.  J.  and  J.  H. Earl,  Lead aerosols in the
     atmosphere,  increasing  concentrations,  Science,
     169:577-80,1970.

-------
                                             TRACE METALS - MUNICIPAL/URBAN AREAS            39


8. Young,  D.  R.,  Mercury in  the  environment: a         as  indicators  of  the variation of manganese-54,
    summary   of  information   pertinent  to   the         cobalt-60,    and  zinc-65    in   the   marine
    distribution  of mercury in the Southern California         environment.  Paper  presented  at   the  IAEA
    Bight, So. Calif.  Coastal Water Research Project,         symposium  on  the Interaction  of   Radioactive
    TR 103,1971.                                         Contaminants with the Constituents of the Marine
                                                          Environment, at Seattle, Washington, June 10—14,
9. Young, D. R. and T. R. Folsom, Mussels and barnacles         1972.

-------
LUNCHEON ADDRESS
                H. A. Laitinen
                University of Illinois

-------
          OVERVIEW OF  EFFECTS  OF  TRACE  METALS
                                            H. A. LAITINEN
                                          University of Illinois
                                             Urbana, Illinois
  We may look on the environmental effects  of trace
metals from the very narrow viewpoint of the immediate
effects upon the human population or from the much
broader viewpoint  of  their effects upon the various
components of the total environment including man. It
is important, I think,  to take the broadest viewpoint,
first  because man  can  be  indirectly  affected  by
accumulations  of  pollutants  in  any  part  of  his
environment, and second because mankind should have a
concern for other living species as well as for the future
generations of his own species.
  Trace metals may be classified as to  those essential to
life and those not known to be essential to life processes.
Of those known to be essential for at least some species
of life, we may list iron, copper, zinc, manganese, cobalt,
nickel,  molybdenum,  and  vanadium.  Some  metals,
formerly thought to act only as poisons, are recognized
to be micronutrients at very low concentrations. Among
these are selenium,  chromium, and arsenic (1). Even
cadmium has been listed as a micronutrient, and some
authorities have  speculated that ail elements for which
organisms develop a  tolerance  might be  essential  for
some function. Lead is an element for  which there is no
known beneficial function, but which  is so wide-spread
as to be detectable in all plants and animals.
  A typical biological  response curve  would  show an
increasingly   beneficial    effect   with   increasing
concentration up to a certain optimum level.  Beyond
this level, there is a tolerance region which may be either
relatively  narrow  or  broad, beyond  which  benefits
decrease, injurious effects begin, and finally a lethal dose
is reached.  For  those elements  not known  to  be
essential, the first region of the response curve is  missing,
but there is generally a tolerance region followed by the
toxic and lethal dose regions. In this group of metals, we
can list at least theoretically all  metals not  included
among the major or minor essential elements. Of greatest
concern, of course, are those known to be toxic at low
or moderate concentrations, for example,  cadmium,
mercury, and lead.
  Trace metals are introduced into the environment by
several mechanisms.  First  of all,  it is important to
distinguish between natural and man-made distribution,
because  the  former  constitutes  a background  level
against which man-made  pollution  can be measured.
Among the  natural  mechanisms,  we  should  include
weathering and leaching of minerals, with distribution
via  natural   waters  or air borne  particulates.  Also,
volcanic action and natural gases are known to introduce
substantial   quantities   of  certain  metals,  notably
mercury, into the  environment. Among the man-made
sources we can  recognize three important mechanisms.
First,  particulate  matter enters the atmosphere  from
smoke stacks, incinerators, open fires, and automotive
exhausts. The latter source accounts for the introduction
of most of the lead. The second source is in the form of
liquid solutions, either industrial wastes and effluents or
municipal sewage. Trace metals entering sewage  tend to
be concentrated in sewage  sludge, the disposal of which
may spread  the metal  through the environment if the
sludge is  used for agricultural purposes  or landfill. The
third source  of trace metals is through chemicals applied
to the soil as pesticides. In a listing (2) of 280 pesticides,
heavy metals were mentioned 141  times in 112 of the
formulations. The listings mentioned mercury 45 times,
copper  28,  zinc  24,  cadmium  13, manganese 12,
chromium 7, tin 5, nickel 4, iron 3, and lead 1. In 1970,
90,000 tons  of fungicides were used in agriculture in the
United States. In that same year,  204,000 pounds of
mercury-containing fungicides were used in the United
States  and  one  million  in  the  world as  a  whole.
Presumably this usage has  been strongly curtailed  since
that time.
  The  main  mechanisms of movement of trace metals
are  through air borne particulate matter and through the
movement of natural  waters. Rainfall and  snowfall
represent mechanisms  whereby particulate  matter  is
removed  from the  atmosphere and into surface waters
either  as dissolved or suspended matter or sediments.
Heavy metals tend to be concentrated preferentially in
the  suspended matter of water rather than being in true
solution,  but  both  suspended matter and  solution
                                                   41

-------
42
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
present mechanisms of transport. Of the trace metals in
solution,  electrochemical   methods  can  distinguish
between labile and bound metal. The distinction is that,
of the total heavy metal contained in solution, only a
portion responds to the electroanalytical  method, for
example  anodic stripping voltammetry,  if the  natural
water sample is analyzed as received. On the other hand,
if the sample  is  acidified,  then the electrochemical
method shows the  total  heavy  metal content  of the
sample. It is  believed  that  the natural water  sample
contains complexing agents which tie up the metal ions,
for example lead or copper ions, in a form to which the
method does  not respond.  Acidification  releases the
metal ions from the bound into the labile form. Further
evidence  as  to  the nature of the binding is revealed by
the technique of gel permeation  chromatography (3). If
the natural  water sample is percolated  through a gel
permeation   chromatography   column,   the   various
fractions  indicate  the  presence of traces  of  organic
matter of relatively high molecular weight,  of the order
of 10,000, presumably originating from sources  such as
humic acids.
  Exactly what the significance of such binding of heavy
metals in  natural waters is,  is not  at all  clear at the
present time, from the viewpoint of uptake  of metals by
plant  or animal life. It is possible, of course, for  natural
complexing  agents to  solubilize heavy  metals from
minerals. In the same way, there has been concern over
the possibility that man-made complexing agents  such as
NTA may solubilize metals held in insoluble form. As far
as I am aware, there is no evidence that NTA used as an
additive in detergents could act in this way, because its
biodegradability  would  prevent   the   buildup   of
appreciable concentrations.
  Another form of binding of metals in natural waters is
by adsorption on inorganic colloids, for example, clays.
Both  in natural waters and in soils, clays are known to
bind heavy metals very tenaciously so that only a very
small  fraction of the metal content in waters or soils are
present  in true solution. We  have found, for example,
that a clay-rich soil heavily  treated with additions of
soluble lead salt shows less than 1 ppm of soluble lead in
the soil moisture. Nevertheless, it turns out that  a plant
can extract heavy metal from the insoluble as well as the
soluble  components  present  in soil.  This' will be
discussed in further detail later.
  The biological effects of trace elements need  a great
deal  more  thorough investigation.  First of  all,  it is
simplistic  to list  elements  as  I have  done without
specifying chemical forms. The  widely differing toxic
effects of different forms of mercury are well known by
now,  but  the  same  situation  must pertain to most
elements to greater or lesser extent. Thus chromium (VI)
is much more toxic  than  chromium (III).  Cobalt  is an
essential  element  to higher organisms in the form of
vitamin  B,2  but useless  and even  toxic in inorganic
forms. Inorganic cobalt is converted to vitamin BI 2 only
by  lower  organisms,  to which  inorganic  cobalt  is
essential at low concentrations.
  As mentioned previously, plant roots can extract trace
metals from forms that are  insoluble in soil moisture.
This can be  demonstrated by a simple experiment. If a
plant such as a  corn plant  is  grown in a hydroponic
culture, containing lead, the uptake  by the leaves or
stalks of  the corn plant is roughly comparable to the
lead content of the liquid nutrient. That is, if a nutrient
contains a  few  micrograms  per  milliliter of  lead or
cadmium ion, then the plant tissue on a dry weight basis
will contain  a few micrograms  per gram.  On the other
hand, if a soil is  treated with a clay containing  lead, or
even with an insoluble form of lead such as lead sulfide,
then the plant tissues can take up much more lead than
would be  indicated  by  the  lead content of the soil
moisture (4). This can be attributed to  the solubilizing
properties  of the  organic substances  exuded  by the
growing plant roots. This root exudate can be shown to
consist  of a complex mixture of chemical compounds
including such materials as sugars, phenols, and proteins
which evidently  are localized and concentrated in the
soil system  whereas they are diluted in the hydroponic
system.   In   addition,  soil  bacteria  can  break down
insoluble salts such as sulfides, thus releasing the heavy
metal for plant uptake.
  It  is dangerous to  generalize too quickly about the
behavior of  trace metals based on  simple chemical
analogies, because the biochemical mechanisms  may be
greatly  different. To illustrate  this point, we might
contrast the behavior of lead and cadmium in relation to
plant uptake (5).  These two  metals  are taken up in
comparable  amounts  from hydroponic cultures  of corn
plants, insofar as comparisons  of stalks or leaves are
concerned. On the other hand, if the roots are analyzed,
then we see a marked contrast. While both elements are
concentrated in the roots, the degree of concentration is
very much more pronounced for lead than for cadmium.
For example, a hydroponic culture of corn roots shows
an accumulation up to  3,000 ppm of lead and 200 ppm
of cadmium in  the  roots when  both  were  grown in
solutions containing 20 ppm. It is found that the bulk of
the lead,  perhaps  90  to 95 percent,  can be  readily
extracted from the intact root system by washing with a
complexing agent such as EDTA. A less efficient washing
can be achieved with a calcium nitrate solution. The lead
is largely contained on the outside rather than within the
interior  of the root system. The root membrane seems to
represent a first line of defense  against the entry of lead
into the  plant. The  exact  form  of  the lead  on the
surfaces  of  the  roots  is still unknown. It  may  be
considered as being  ion exchanged but  some recent
evidence from electron microscopy suggests the presence
of small nodules that are localized in character (6).
  Another  point  of  difference  between lead  and
cadmium  is in  the   solubility  of phosphates. Since
phosphates  are naturally occurring constituents of all

-------
                                                                         LUNCHEON REMARKS
                                                  43
living  cells,  it  might  be  natural  to  expect  the
precipitation  of lead  phosphate  within  cell  tissues.
Indeed   we  have   found  some  evidence  for  such
precipitation through  scanning electron  microscopy of
plant tissues containing relatively high concentrations of
lead. Incidentally, the  first symptoms of lead poisoning
in a plant, as far as the plant physiologist is concerned, is
a leaf discoloration and curl characteristics of phosphate
deficiency.  At  the present time  there is  still some
uncertainty as to the precise form  of the phosphate.  It
has  been known for several years that  if lead acetate
solutions  are  applied  to  plant cells,  a  localized
precipitation of lead phosphate as lead hydroxyapatite
or hydroxyorthophosphate, Pb5(P04)3OH, is observed.
A report, as yet unverified, of the possible formation of
lead  pyrophosphate,  presumably  arising  through the
interaction  of lead ion with pyrophosphate  which  is
known to be an intermediate in phosphate metabolism,
has  appeared (7). Once the trace metal enters the plant
system in soluble form, it is rapidly translocated through
the  plant. Apparently certain metals are strongly bonded
at  membrane  walls  both  in  plant  and animal cells.
Whether  this   might   be  regarded   as  a  protective
mechanism or as  an adverse effect, depends upon the
nature and function of the membrane.
  Whether heavy metals can enter plants directly from
airborne particulates has not been clearly established.
Some authorities maintain that such  particles  have no
effects, apart  from the possible blockage of stomata of
leaves, while others point to the fact that it is impossible
to  wash  all traces of metals, such as lead, from the
surfaces  of leaves  even with detergents  or complexing
agents.   Detailed   examination  of  plant  leaves  by
techniques such as  scanning electron microscopy should
help to resolve this question.
  The entry of trace metals into the animal organism can
be  through two  principal routes, through ingestion of
food and  water and  through the respiratory system.
Experimental  evidence indicates that ingested lead  is
taken up quite inefficiently by the human body, perhaps
to  the extent  of  10 percent.  The reason for  this low
uptake has never been stated, but it would appear that if
the   body  has  a  defense  mechanism  against  the
absorption  of lead from the intestine, there may be a
disease   corresponding  to  the  breakdown  of  this
mechanism. Gearly, a  detailed study is needed. Lead
breathed  in  as  particulate matter  is  much  more
efficiently absorbed, so that some  authorities  feel that
these two  sources  might  be  of  the same  order of
magnitude  even  though   the  intake  through  food
represents a much greater amount.  In the blood stream,
perhaps 95  percent of the lead is associated with the red
corpuscles and only 5 percent with the blood serum. The
blood presumably represents the medium by which lead
is   transported  into   the   various  organs,   but  the
quantitative rate law is unknown.
  It is known  that the skeleton represents a depository,
from  which lead  is  only  partially  extractable and
presumably   only   under  severe  conditions  such  as
treatment with chelating agents.  It is  also known that
lead forms special nodules in kidney tissue, and it has
been  inferred  that  these  nodules  are  insoluble lead
protein  complexes. Cadmium also  concentrates in the
kidneys but because the  protein complexes of cadmium
are more soluble,  they do not form the same  type of
nodules. Cadmium has a pronounced effect upon the
blood pressure, presumably through its action upon the
kidneys.
  Children appear  to be much more susceptible to nerve
damage and  brain  damage by lead  poisoning than  do
adults.  The  reason is not at all clear, and therefore it
appears to be  difficult  to assign a  threshold level  of
blood  lead  content below  which  no damage can  be
detected.  Some   authorities,  notably  Kehoe,  have
regarded  80 micrograms per 100 milliliters as a safe
limit,  whereas other  authorities have  felt  that  40
micrograms  or even 36 might be more realistic and safer
limits (8). Where we draw the line makes a great deal of
difference,  because   most   children   exhibiting   80
micrograms  of blood  lead and showing symptoms  of
poisoning have been demonstrably exposed to sources
such as paints. On the other hand, 15  to 20 percent of
children in clinical tests in downstate Illinois have shown
blood lead contents over 40 micrograms (9). Authorities
in England have recently placed much more stress on the
possibility of lead  from automotive fuels representing an
important contribution to the poisoning of children than
have authorities in this  country (8).
  When  we  attempt  to describe the effects of  trace
metals in biochemical terms, we are  confronted with
more ignorance than knowledge.
  Biological effects of trace  metals can be described at
various  organizational  levels,  namely:  the  organism or
whole plant or animal, the organ, the cell, the organelle,
the membrane, and finally  the molecular  level. As we
proceed down the organizational  scale, the  depth of our
ignorance increases except that finally at the molecular
or  enzymatic level once more we find  some  positive
knowledge.  Clinical studies  on  lead  poisoning  reveal
effects like  mental retardation and disturbances of the
nervous system at  the organism level. Concentrations in
certain  organs,  for  example the  kidney, are  well
established.  At the cellular level, interference with the
energy-conversion  process  have  been  established, and
this can be traced to the subcelJular, or organelle level, in
that isolated mitochondria both  from  plant and animal
cells  show  the  toxic  effects.  When  we reach the
membrane level,  we  find  references to preferential
binding, but little  detail as  to the  mechanism of the
binding,  or  effects on transport  rates  through the
membrane.  At  the molecular  level, we find  vague
references to the binding of metals to sulfhydryl groups
of  enzyme  systems and speculations as  to the relative
effects   of   metals   based  on  the  stabilities  of

-------
44
             CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
sulfhydryl-containing chelates, but little that is solid and
well established. I am generalizing here, and referring to
toxicity and not to specific biochemical systems, such as
hemoglobin, vitamin BI 2 and chlorophyll, which involve
trace metals in well defined roles.
  Among the areas  requiring further  research are the
protective mechanisms for trace metals especially among
the  higher organisms, both  plant and  animal.  These
protective mechanisms could include such phenomena as
preferential binding to membrane surfaces, precipitation
as inorganic salts or organic derivatives, complexation by
biological chelating agents, etc. An almost  completely
unexplored area is the question of the combined effects
of two or more trace metals. Are the effects additive,
competitive,  or  synergistic?  If  each  metal  taken
separately has  a  certain  tolerance level, what is the
tolerance level  for a mixture  of  two  metals?  Are the
protective  mechanisms  for  two  or  more   metals
independent of one another?
  In summary,  a great  deal of comprehensive  work is
needed on the effects  of trace  metals  on the  total
environment. This work must consider both extremes
and  all intermediate organizational levels, and  it must
consider  the  interactions among  the trace elements as
well  as their individual effects. Both the short-term and
long-term  effects  need  consideration.  By long-term, I
mean a time period commensurate with the life span of
the  entity under consideration. If we  are dealing with
human beings, this means  a period of the order of a
century, but if we are dealing with cells, it might be a
much  shorter period. If we are considering effects to
mankind as a species, we need to look at truly long-term
effects, over time  spans of hundreds  or thousands of
years.

REFERENCES
1. Goldwater, L. J, Industrial Medicine, 41, 13,1972.
1. Lagerwerff, J. V., N. C.  Brady, Ed., pp. 343-364 in
     AAS Publication #85, 1967.
3. Bender,  M.  E.,  W.  R.  Matson,  R.  A.  Jordan,
     Environmental Science and  Technology 4  520
     1970.
4. Braids,  O.  C.,  University  of  Illinois NSF-RANN
     project, unpublished results.
5. Koeppe, D. E., R. Root, R. R. Gadde, University of
     Illinois, NSF-RANN project, unpublished results.
6. Malone, C., University of Illinois NSF-RANN project,
     unpublished results.
7. Skogerboe, R. K.,Colorado State NSF-RANN project,
     private communication.
8. Smith,  D. B., Biologist, 18, 52,  1971; Chemistry  in
     Britain,!, 54, 284,1971; 8, 240,1972.
9. Fine, P. R.,  et.  al., J. Am. Med. Assn.,  221, 1475,
     1972.

-------
         SESSION II
TRANSPORT AND  EFFECTS
                   Chairman:
                   H. Wiser
                   U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

-------
    PHYSICAL TRANSPORT OF TRACE METALS IN THE
                   LAKE WASHINGTON WATERSHED
                              R. S. BARNES AND W. R. SCHELL
                                    University of Washington
                                      Seattle, Washington
INTRODUCTION
  The biogeochemical cycle removes material from the
lithosphere, redistributes it throughout the atmosphere
and hydrosphere and ultimately reincorporates it into
the lithosphere. This continuous cyclic process includes
weathering,  erosion,  transport, and deposition. The
transfer rates and amounts of material participating in
this cycle can be accelerated, for example, by poor land
management practices, or by increasing the input of
material  as byproducts of technological developments.
By this latter means man has introduced  quantities of
trace metals into the environment. These trace metals
are frequently  transported  easily  and  are injected
directly  into the major transport  pathways  of  the
environment. The amount of increase of these trace
metals in a  specific  environment  can  be  measured in
recent sediment profiles where the time history  of
deposition can be established.
Geochemical Cycle
  The geochemical  cycle consists of source, transport,
and sink. The natural source of trace metals  is the
lithosphere;  artificial sources have  been created by
industrialization and urbanization; transport occurs by
wind, water and ice; the sinks are fresh  water lakes,
rivers or the oceans. The most significant modes of trace
metal transport are by wind and water as shown in Table
1, where amounts of heavy  metals produced and the
potential transport to the ocean are given.
  The removal of trace metals to a geochemical sink
must include an aqueous phase.  Removal processes
occurring  can include  absorption, precipitation,
oxidation, reduction, and complex formation. Because
of the rapid removal processes, in general, many trace
metals are lost from the aquatic environment within a
short  distance  from the initial input  (1, 2).  The
concentrations of trace metals in water are low and were
             TABLE 1 GLOBAL TRACE METAL PRODUCTION AND POTENTIAL OCEAN
                      INPUT*
Element
Pb
Cu
V
Ni
Cr
Sn
Cd
Hg
Mining
production
(106 tons/yr)
3
6
0.02
0.5
2
0.2
0.01
0.009
Transport by
rivers to oceans
(106 tons/yr)
0.1
0.25
0.03
0.01
0.04
0.002
0.0005
0.003
Atmospheric
washout
(106 tons/yr)
0.3
0.2
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.03
0.01
0.08
Ratio
aeolian/
fluvial
3.0
0.8
0.7
3.0
0.5
15
20
27
            * Reference 3.
                                              45

-------
46
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
difficult to measure until  recent  improvements  were
made in analytical techniques. The analytical difficulties
of  the  past  have  contributed  to  the limited
understanding of the geochemical cycle  of many  trace
elements. It  is through a greater understanding of the
geochemical cycling of trace metals that insight can be
gained  on  problems of pollutants  in  the aquatic
environment.

Modes of Physical Transport
   The major modes of physical transport are advection
and diffusion.  The  advective  processes are by far the
most important in the transport of most  trace metals in
the  atmosphere or hydrosphere on a global scale. For
certain volatile  trace  elements such as  mercury, the
diffusion process from the lithosphere would dominate.
   Three modes of advective transport of trace metals are
(a) that which is carried by the wind (aeolian), (b) that
which is carried by running water  either suspended or
dissolved (fluvial),  and (c)  that  which  is removed or
transported by rain or  other forms  of precipitation
scavenging (pluvial). The  settling  of particles under the
influence  of  gravity  is  a  major  mode  of vertical
transport.
   Aeolian  transport was  noted as  early  as  the  12th
century (4). Meridional and zonal dust  transport  have
been observed from the  Sahara- to the  mid-European
continent (5),  and from  Africa to  the  Caribbean (6),
volcanic eruptions  such as Krakatoa spread volcanic dust
worldwide.  Radioactive  fallout  originating   from
Eniwetok, Bikini, and Novya  Zemyla, USSR, and Lop
Nor, China, has been followed around the world. These
sources have served as tracers of geochemical processes
and have permitted calculations of residence times and
transit times in the atmosphere to  be made (7—10); the
input of the radioactive tracers into the hydrosphere has
permitted similar calculations to be made in the oceans
and freshwater  areas (11-13). The recent  findings on
the  build  up of lead and  mercury in  Greenland  ice
profiles illustrate long range aeolian transport of  these
trace  metals  (14,  15). High concentrations of  trace
metals in surface air of North American  cities indicates
that short  range aeolian transport is considerable  (16).
Significant  quantities  of iron,  zinc,  arsenic, silver,
antimony, cobalt and mercury were found near Toronto
(17); in the  Chicago area concentrations in  excess of
10-9  g/m3  were  found for  iron, zinc,  manganese,
vanadium, antimony,  chromium,  mercury, aluminum,
cerium, silver, and selenium (18).
   It is apparent  that  the  trace  metal  input to the
atmosphere and hydrosphere follows  the  transport
processes of the geochemical cycle. The problem arising
from local  pollution sources  of  trace metals may be
exported  thousands of kilometers  from the point of
origin.  The pollution from  industrialized nations  then
becomes  an  international  concern. It   is  clear  that
effective control of potential trace metal pollutants can
be exercised only at the source where the quantity am
chemical form can be regulated.
Sediment Method
  The  evaluation of contemporary  transport  am
distribution of trace metals in  a given region can b<
achieved by systematic  collection and analysis of air anc
water  samples,   dry fallout, precipitation, soils  anc
sediments.  While  this  comprehensive  technique ii
satisfactory  for  evaluating  contemporary  events, ii
cannot determine the history of trace metals in a giver
region. To  determine the history of trace metal build uf
in a given region,  soil  and sediment profiles are mosl
suitable. Because of weathering, natural mixing,  and
disruption by human activities, undisturbed soil profiles
are difficult  to obtain.  However, sediment cores often
are uniquely suited for the preservation  of the trace
metals history.
  Sediment cores for trace  metals have  the following
advantages:
1. relatively independent from weathering,
2. sedimentary deposits, in general, increase at a fairly
  constant rate per year,
3. sedimentary  material serves as scavengers for trace
  metals,
4. usually are outside the sphere of human modification
  but  frequently contain an  anthropogenic anomaly
  that can be specifically dated.
  Two basic assumptions are necessary in using sediment
                                 BELLINGHAM
  SCALE IN KILOMETERS
     16   0   16   32
     I ' ' ' I	1	1
              Figure 1. Puget Sound basin.

-------
                                                      TRACE METALS - PHYSICAL TRANSPORT
                                                 47
cores for the trace metal history; first, the system must
be closed to gains and  losses  of the  trace metal at all
levels in the core and second, a sequential accumulation
must have  taken place.  Since the man-made increase in
trace elements has occurred in recent years, it is essential
to  have  time  resolution to  within  a few  years.
Practically, this demands a sedimentation rate of greater
than about two mm/yr.
  The application of sediment cores to the time history
of trace metals in  Lake Washington has been made.
Figure  1 shows the Lake Washington area and the major
drainage basin, the Cedar River. The urban and suburban
development of the  region has been  increasing rapidly
since about 1940. Lake Washington has an area of 88
km2 and a  mean depth  of  33 meters. The City  of
Seattle  lies  along the   western  shore  with suburban
development surrounding the lake. It  is  spanned by two
floating  bridges completed in  1941 and  1963.  A ship
canal and locks were built in 1916 which connected the
lake with Lake Union and Puget Sound. This lowered
the lake some 3 m to  its current elevation of 4.3 m
above  mean sea level.  To maintain sufficient  flow of
water  to operate  the locks, the Cedar River, with an
average flow  of 19  m3/sec, was permanently diverted
into the southern end of the lake in 1916.
  The  lake has a history of cultural eutrophication (19)
but little direct industrial waste discharge is believed to
have occurred.  Recovery from cultural eutrophication
has been rapid since 1968 (20). The City of Renton is
located on the Cedar River where Boeing and Pacific Car
and Foundry plants  are  potential  major industrial
sources of trace metals.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Mercury
  The  core locations  for sampling trace metals are shown
in Figure 2. The mercury profiles for  the  three cores
taken  are shown in Figure 3. The magnitude of local
variations is shown by  duplicate cores  from station 2;
the  absolute  concentrations  are  initially 60  percent
different at the surface. A fixed point in time has been
found  at the 18 cm level at station  2  (21) and 25 cm at
station 4 when the  Lake Washington Ship Canal and
Government Locks were constructed. A  silt band was
produced when the Jake level was lowered three m and
the Cedar  River diversion was completed in 1916. On
this basis the sediment rate was found to be 3.3  mm/yr
for station  2 in agreement with reported values  at a
nearby location (21). For station 4, by a fitting of the
similar  mercury structure,  and  the  silt  layer, a
sedimentation rate of 4.4 mm/yr is  indicated.  This is
consistent with the core  location which was closer to the
Cedar River, a major source of sediment material.
  The  discrepancy between stations is  in the absolute
magnitude of the mercury concentration. The similarity
in profiles  indicates  that general lake conditions are
                                 SAMMAMISH
                                    RIVER
                               MERCER  ISLAND
                                  BRIDGED
                             LAKE  WASHINGTON
  Figure 2.  Lake Washington core sampling locations.


being  reflected.  It  is  apparent  that  the  mercury
associated with the larger sedimentation rate has a lower
concentration; the  total  mercury available to  the
sediment, however, can be constant.J"he dilution by low
mercury sediment could account for the discrepancy
between the cores from station 4  and  station 2.  The
difference in sediment rate is ca. 33 percent, whereas the
differences in absolute concentrations is ca. 50 percent,
and  probably within the error of the  sampling  and
analysis. The source  of mercury to  the sediments must
be dispersed throughout  the  lake. This would indicate
that  the mercury is being transported either by aeolian
processes  or that  the mercury in the lake is added at
about the same rate throughout. The dramatic decrease
at 4  to  6 cm for all elements represents what is believed
to be redistribution of silt due to the construction of the
second floating bridge, completed in 1963. These core
section samples had high silica content in contrast to the
other samples. The  X-ray  radiographs of cores taken
nearby show a density anomaly at the same depth which
could be  attributed  to the  bridge construction (21).
Additional cores have been taken to attempt to define
local and areal distribution of the mercury input.
  At the present  time it is not possible to separate out
the  several  suspected sources which contribute to the
mercury budget  of  the lake.  Suspected sources for

-------
48
CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
mercury include: combustion of fossil fuels, especially
coal; aeolian  and  aeolian-fluviaJ  transport  from  the
Tacoma  smelter; municipal sewage or treated effluents;
                                        local industrial or domestic sources such as mercury in
                                        marine paints, fungicides, etc.  The mercury associated
                                        with  sewage  wastes  and  storm  runoff  should  be
                                PPM MERCURY
                                  0.8
                                                                              0.4
                                                                                         1971
                                                                                        -1881
                                                                                       J1866
                              Figure 3. Mercury in Lake Washington cores.
 I
 i—
 a.
 LU
 Q
      10
     20
     30
     40
                   50
                   100
   PPM  LEAD
150        200
                                                               250
                                                                300
                                                       STATION 2
                                               EVERGREEN POINT BRIDGE
                                                                                         1971
                                                                                         1956
                                                                                         1941
                                                                                         1926  =
                                                                                         1911
                                                                                         1896
                                                                                         1881
                                                                                         1866
                                                                                         1851
                                                                                    D
                                                                                    o
                               Figure 4.  Lead in Lake Washington core.

-------
                                                      TRACE METALS - PHYSICAL TRANSPORT
                                                 49
diminishing now following the diversion of sewage from
the lake in 1968.
Lead
  The lead profile is shown in Figure 4 for a core from
station 2. The gross structure of the lead concentration
is similar to the mercury core with the increase starting
at the 18 cm level. The lead content is shown to increase
by about a factor of 16 from the base line prior to 1916.
The present sediment concentration of about 300 ppm
indicates a continuous and increasing input source. The
doubling time for  the increase in lead concentration is
about 18 years.
  The  fine  structure of  the  core  can  be  related to
specific events by assuming the sedimentation rate of 3.3
mm/yr and  no migration of the lead after deposition.
The initial increase from base line at 18 to 20 cm depth
can be ascribed to  the diversion of the Cedar River. The
Cedar River  drainage basin is about 500 km2 in area and
is generally downwind (E—NE) of a potential source, the
American Smelting and Refining Company Smelter, in
Tacoma. This smelter has been in operation since 1890
and processed ore  mainly for lead from  1890 to 1913;
current stack emissions  may  be as  much as 40 percent
lead oxide. (22). Aeolian transport  would bring lead to
the drainage basin  and then by fluvial transport into the
lake via the Cedar River. The second rapid increase at
the 14 to 15  cm level would  correspond to the 1920's
when lead  alkyls   were introduced in  gasoline.  The
decrease in  the  lead  deposition from  the 14 to 9  cm
levels would correspond to the depression and war years.
The  use  of gasoline  engines, predominately  in the
automobile, may be directly related to the lead  profile.
The 9 to 0 cm level represents the post war period when
automobile  use  had   increased  rapidly   with  a
corresponding increase in lead concentrations.
  The concentration of lead is increasing at a rapid rate
in the sediment core. It is possible that the proximity of
the station to the bridge, 400 m to the south,  may be
responsible  for  the  high concentrations  measured.
Additional core samples taken recently should better
define the local and  areal distribution of lead in  Lake
Washington sediments.

Zinc  and Copper
  The zinc  and copper concentration profiles shown in
Figure 5 are similar to those of mercury and lead. The
rapid increase in concentration of zinc  occurred at about
the 16 to 17 cm level with the characteristic minimum at
the 6 cm level shown in both zinc and copper. Zinc and
copper concentrations have increased by about a factor
of four over the base line values prior to 1916. The
present  concentrations for zinc at 230 ppm and copper
at 50 ppm have not increased much since 1950.
  The sources of  zinc and copper to the lake  include
natural mineral deposits in the Cedar River watershed,
aeolian  transport  from the smelter  in  Tacoma  and
domestic  and industrial uses of zinc and  copper in
algicides, pesticides, paint, galvanized steel.
                                           PPM HEAVY  METALS
1971

1956-
1941-


1926^

1911-


1896-

1881
1866^

1851

1836
) 50 100 150 200 25
1 I 1 1

^s1^ Cu 	 _ 	 ^— — ^^"
* -> ^^ Zn


0 (
0


) 25 50
i |

1-^
^^
r l_ ^^ A ^
j* 3D ___ ^. — - « ^
10+ / ,/-""

/ /
/ /
-— 	 ~ /
t> i 5
'
j x


y
- \ <( i ^
^ \ ^~
( ) S; .

1 /


30|
1 f >
j C STATION 2 1

STATION 2
1971

1956
1941


1926

1911


1896

1881
1866

^ \ EVERGREEN POINT BRIDGE " 40 1 EVERGREEN POINT -j 1851
's



BRIDGE
-I 1836
                     Figure 5. Copper, zinc, antimony and arsenic in Lake Washington core.

-------
50
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
         PPT IRON

           25        50
u
Z

I
i—
Q.
LU
O
    STATION 2
  EVERGREEN PT
      BRIDGE
 PPT SODIUM

        1.0
—i	1—
                               10  -
                               20
                               30
         STATION  2
       EVERGREEN PT
     40 ABRIDGE
                                   2.0
                                  — 1971
CEDAR  RIVER  FLOW  m3/s

0      10      20
                                                               1956
                       1926

                      \ 1911

                      J1896
                       i
                      i 1881

                       1866-

                        1851
 10
—i—
 30
—i—
                                                                       O
                                                                       o
                                                                       >
   Figure 6. Iron and sodium in Lake Washington core; Cedar River annual discharge averaged over 3-year increments.
 Arsenic and Antimony
   The few data points  for arsenic and  antimony are
 shown  in  Figure  5  measured by  neutron activation
 analysis. The locations in the core were selected after the
 other  trace metals were  analyzed to observe  if these
 elements were  following the  same  pattern. The same
 general pattern of  concentrations was followed.
 Migration of the arsenic from a fixed point of deposition
 could  occur since  a  volatile arsenic compound, AsH3,
 could  be formed in  the  reducing environment of the
 sediment. This  elemental migration  does  not appear to
 be taking place at a rapid rate  which would perturb the
 pro! He  concentrations.  By  inference,  the  mercury
 migration should  be  low, indicating that the elements
 studied,  which  have  been  deposited  in the  lake
 sediments,  do  not  migrate at a significant rate. A more
 detailed  profile is needed  for arsenic and antimony,
 especially in the upper layers.
   The increase  from  natural background  prior  to 1916
 has been about five times for arsenic and antimony. The
 sources  for these trace metals  are  probably  aeolian
 transport  from the  smelter  in  Tacoma. The arsenic
 concentration  increase may also be  from the municipal
 sewage where herbicides and insecticides have been used
 extensively on  gardens, and from arsenic contained in
 detergents.

 Iron and Sodium
   The iron and sodium  profiles are shown in Figure 6.
               Since  these  elements  are  major  constituents of the
               erosion process, the concentration, as a function of time
               (depth), indicates differences caused by natural changes
               in the watershed, which drains into the lake. The profile
               shows fluctuations around a mean value of about 40 ppt
               iron and 1.2  ppt sodium. There is no apparent long term
               trend in the  concentrations of sodium  and iron in the
               sediment data, in contrast  to  trends of the other trace
               metals measured. The minimum at the 6 cm level is again
               evident and for both metals. There appears to be a slight
               increase at the 16 to 18 cm level when the lake level was
               lowered and the Cedar River diversion was completed.
                The erosion rate  depends on the rainfall and should


               TABLE 2 REPRESENTATIVE TRACE METAL CON-
                         CENTRATIONS IN LAKE WASHINGTON
                         IN, mg/liter
Element
Fe
Na
Pb
Zn
Cu
Hg
Average
fluvial
input
0.055
3.43
0.0009
0.026
0.0025
0.00005
Average
fluvial
output
0.033
4.70
0.00085
0.023
0.003
0.00005
Observed range
in lake
0.010-0.095
4.45-5.00
0.0003-0.0012
0.004-0.047
0.0011-0.0079
0.000008-0.000068

-------
                                                       TRACE METALS - PHYSCIAL TRANSPORT
                                                  51
correlate  with runoff.  Figure  6  shows  the general
correlation of iron and sodium concentrations with the
Cedar River discharge, using the discharge as a measure
of total watershed runoff. A study of post-glacial lake
sediments in Northern England showed that the relative
concentrations of alkalai metal elements in sediment was
related directly to the intensity of erosion, for example,
rainfall in the drainage basin (23). Under rapid erosion
conditions less  sodium, for example,  was leached from
the soil particles  and proportionately more was carried
by  the sediment  load for deposition into the lake.
Similarly, in  the  Lake Washington  drainage basin high
rainfall and subsequent high runoff produced sediments
with high sodium concentrations.
  This  same  process  should  occur  for  other
macro-constituents of the sediment  such as  iron and
manganese.  However, unlike  sodium,  chemical  and
biological reactions  can  release these  metals in  the
sediment under certain pH and redox  conditions. These
conditions do not appear to be occurring in  the Lake
Washington sediments.
Budget
  The transport of trace metals to the lake is reflected in
the  core  profiles.   Iron  and  sodium,  for  example,
correlate  with the  discharges  of the   Cedar  River,
indicative  of fluvial transport. The  modes of  transport
for the other trace metals are not evident from the core
profiles  alone,  but  require  geochemical budget
calculations to indicate the relative  importance of wind
and water  processes.  The  preliminary  data  on
measurements, by atomic absorption spectrometry, of
trace metal concentrations are shown in Table 2. Fluvial
input data were  obtained from the  Cedar River and
Sammamish River inlets to the lake, while the outlet
data were obtained from stations in the lake near the
eastern end of the ship canal.
  The  budget  calculation  method has  simplified  the
geochemical system  into: fluvial and aeolian  inputs, a
sedimentary sink, and fluvial output. The aeolian input
of trace  metals was  assumed to be relatively  insoluble
(24). The complex processes of redistribution within the
lake were  neglected  in this  first  approximation since
only  input and  output  were needed in the budget
computations.
  The  input  and output concentrations indicate that,
with the exception of sodium and iron, the trace  metal
concentration in  the water is not greatly changed by
passage through the lake. The data shown in Table 3 are
based on an  average inflow of 1.17 x 109 m3/per year
with an incoming sediment load of 50 x 106 kg/per year
(25) and the data from Table 2; it is assumed that the
incoming sediment has a composition representative of
crustal materials. The aeolian input was estimated by
subtracting  the net  fluvial   input  from  the annual
sediment input. An independent check of the input of
iron and  sodium by aeolian transport, using dustfall
data, indicates that  the estimated aeolian values  are
probably high by a factor  of four, on the basis of net
transport.  This is not considered  a  serious error  for
sodium because of the large magnitude of the  numbers
involved. The discrepancy  in iron is  probably due  to
insufficient iron data; since iron is both biologically and
chemically active in the aqueous environment,  adequate
sampling is difficult.
  In contrast to iron and sodium, the heavy metals show
very different transport effects. While the annual fluvial
input is approximately equal to the amount deposited in
the sediments for  zinc, copper, and mercury, the  net
fluvial  transport, input-output, retained in  the lake
sediments amounts to only 32 percent, 44 percent, and
7 percent, respectively. This indicates substantial aeolion
contributions for all these metals. The aeolian transport
                       TABLE 3  TRACE METAL BUDGET FOR LAKE WASHINGTON
Elements


Fe, tons
Na, tons
Pb, tons
Zn, tons
Cu, tons
Hg,kg



Input
2570
5420
1.3
34
5.7
62
Annual

Fluvial
output
40
5440
1
27
3.5
58
transport


Net
2530
(-)20
0.3
7
2.2
4


Aeolian
input
2200*
180f
29.8
15
2.8
56
Annual
deposition in
sediments
(measured)
4700
160
30
22
5
60
                     *Based on an average dustfall for Seattle (26) of 38.92 U. S. tons/mi2/mon =
                      14.8 x 106 kg/yr over Lake Washington, and using an average iron concentration
                      of 3400 ppm for urban dust (18), the iron input due to aeolian transport would
                      be on the order of 500 tons/yr.
                     t Based on (*) above, Na input is 45 tons/yr from aeolian transport; even if a
                      higher Na concentration is assumed because of marine aerosols, the aeolian
                      component is still very small compared to the fluvial.

-------
52
          CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
for lead is even more striking; just considering the input,
about 10 times as much lead enters the lake from the air
as by fluvial means. Using lead concentrations in dustfall
for Seattle (26), the input from the atmosphere to the
lake  is estimated to be  24,000 kg/per year, which is in
good  agreement  with  the  estimated  atmospheric
contribution of 29,750 kg/per year.
  Another way  of approaching  these input calculations
is to consider the nature of the  trace metal enrichment
in the  sediments  since  1916. Table  4 shows  the
enrichment in   the  contemporary  surface  sediment
relative  to the pre-1916 sediment. Table 5 shows the
contemporary aeolian input of heavy metals to  the
sediments,  as estimated from the enrichment  of these
metals  in  the  present  sediment,  assuming that  the
enrichment since  1916  is due  entirely to  aeolian
material. This estimate is  compared to that for aeolian
input, as derived from the net transport budget in Table
3. The  results  are striking for lead  and mercury in
particular, where both methods  of calculation indicate a
very high aeolian component. Copper and zinc also show
substantial aeolian contributions, but the percentages are
not as large as those of mercury and lead, reflecting the
higher natural backgrounds of copper and zinc in the
core.

TABLE 4  TRACE METAL ENRICHMENT IN LAKE
           WASHINGTON SEDIMENTS SINCE 1916
Element
Fe
Na
Pb
Zn
Cu
Hg
Enrichment ratio
1971/pre-1916
1
1
16.6
3.9
3.6
10.0
  Based on the  lake  volume,  fluvial  output  and
sedimentary  deposition, the following mean residence
times were  estimated: iron,  11  days;  lead, 26 days;
mercury, 15 months; copper, 16  months; zinc,  21
months; and sodium, 29 months. The mean residence
time for the lake water is also 29 months. Such figures
must be considered very  rough approximations, as the
assumption  of complete  mixing time, being much less
than the mean residence time, does not appear  valid
during periods of stratification, June to October, at least
for  iron and lead; nevertheless, the  ordering of mean
residence times  Fe < Pb <  Hg  < Cu  < Zn < Na is
identical to  those estimated for these trace metals in the
ocean (27).
  There is evidence that  the  trace metals are primarily
transported   in  the suspended load, often in  inert
positions within the suspended particles (28). A further
observation   is that much of  the detrital trace metals
never leave the solid phase from initial rock weathering
TABLES  PERCENTAGE  OF  CURRENT HEAVY
          METAL INPUT TO LAKE WASHINGTON
          SEDIMENTS ATTRIBUTED TO  AEOLIAN
          PROCESSES  AS  ESTIMATED   FROM
          TRACE  METAL  ENRICHMENT   AND
          BUDGET DATA
    Element
Contemporary aeolian input
       to sediment

Pb
Zn
Cu
Hg
Enrichment*
94%
74%
72%
91%
Budgetf
99%
68%
56%
93%
 * Assuming that all the heavy metal enrichment since 1916 is
  due to aeolian transport.
 fOn a net transport basis.

to detrital deposition. This is demonstrated by the Lake
Washington  sediments, where the  trace  element
composition more nearly reflects that of the crustal
materials in the suspended load, rather than that of the
incoming  water.  Lead, entering  the lake  from the
atmosphere, appears to have a very short residence time
in  the  water   column,  as  shown  by  the low
concentrations measured  in  the  water, and by mean
residence time estimates. It is suspected that the same is
true for other heavy metals in atmospheric material, but
our data can not confirm this.
SUMMARY
  In  the  Lake  Washington drainage,  trace  metal
enrichment appears to be correlated  with the cultural
development of the region, and is brought into the local
hydrosphere principally  by advective  atmospheric
transport.  Fluvial  processes  are  of  considerable
significance, but  appear to be reflected in the sediments
primarily on the  basis of the suspended load. It has been
found that trace  metal analysis of recent lake sediments
can provide  meaningful data concerning the impact of
man  on  his  environment, and   offers  a unique
opportunity for evaluating   past  environmental
conditions.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
  This  study  was supported by  U.S.  Environmental
Protection  Agency grant number R-800357.

REFERENCES
 l.Turekian, K.K., Rivers, tributaries, and estuaries,
       9-74, In D.W. Hood (ed.), Impingement of Man
       on the Oceans, Wiley-Interscience, 1971.
 2. Cranston, R.E. and D.E. Buckley, Mercury pathways
       in  a river and estuary, Environ. Sci. Technol.
       6:274-278,1972.
 3.National  Academy  of  Sciences,  Marine
       Environmental  Quality:  Suggested  Research
       Programs for Understanding Man's  Effect on the

-------
                                                   TRACE METALS - PHYSICAL TRANSPORT
                                                                                                    53
      Oceans, National Academy  of  Sciences,  107,
      Washington, D.C .,1971.
 4. Rex, R.W. and E.D. Goldberg, Insolubles, 295-304,
      In MJSf.  Hill (ed.), The  Sea, Vol. 1, Physical
      Oceanography, Wiley-Interscience, 1962.
 S.Walther, J.,Der grosse Staubfall von  1901 und das
      Lossproblem, Naturwiss. 18:603-605, 1903.
 6. Brown, W.F., Volcanic ash over the Caribbean, June
      1951, Monthly Weather Rev. 80:59-62, 1952.
 7.Pierson, D.H. and R.S. Cambray, Interhemispheric
      transfer of debris from nuclear explosions using a
      simple   atmospheric  model,  Nature
      216:755-758,1967.
 S.Krey,  P.W.  and B.  Krajewski, Comparison  of
      atmospheric transport model calculations  with
      observations of radioactive debris, J. Geophys.
      Res. 75:2901-2908,1970.
 9. Fabian,  P.,  W.F   Libby, and  C.E.  Palmer,
      Stratospheric   residence  time  and
      interhemispheric  mixing of strontium 90  from
      fallout  and  rain,   J   Geophys.  Res.
      73:3611-3616,1968.
10. Schell,   W.R., G. Sauzay, and B.R.  Payne, Tritium
      injection and concentration distribution in the
      atmosphere, J.  Geophys. Res. 75:2251—2266,
      1970.
11. Walton, A., M. Ergin, and DJD. Harkness, Carbon 14
      concentrations in the atmosphere and  carbon
      dioxide   exchange  rates,  J.  Geophys.  Res.
      75:3089-3098,1970.
12.Suess, H.E., The  transfer of carbon  14 and  tritium
      from the atmosphere to the ocean, J. Geophys.
      Res. 75:2363-2364,1970.
13. Rafter,  T.A.  and  B.J.  O'Brien, Exchange  rates
      between the atmosphere and the  ocean as shown
      from  recent C14 measurements  in the South
      Pacific, Paper presented  at  the Twelfth Nobel
      Symp. on Radiocarbon Variations and Absolute
      Chronology, Uppsala, August 1969.
14. Murozumi,  M.,  TJ.  Chow, and   C.  Patterson,
      Chemical concentrations  of  pollutant  lead
      aerosols,  terrestrial  dusts,  and sea salts  in
      Greenland and Antarctic snow strata, Geochim.
      Cosmochim. Acta 33:1247-1294,1969.
15. Weiss, H.V., M. Koide, and ED. Goldberg, Mercury
      in a Greenland  ice sheet: evidence  of recent
      input by man, Science 174:692-694,1971.
16. Tabor, E.C. and W.V Warren, Distribution of certain
      metals in the atmosphere of some  American
       cities, AJvlA. Arch. Ind. Health  17:145-151,
       1958.
 17. Lee, J. and R.E. Jervis, Detection of pollutants in
       airborne particulates  by  activation  analysis,
       Trans. Amer. Nucl. Soc. 11:50-51, 1968.
 18. Briar, S.S., D.M. Nelson, J.R. Kline, P.P. Gustafson,
       E.L. Kanabrocki, C.E. Moore, and DM. Hattori,
       Instrumental analysis for trace elements present
       in  Chicago  area surface air,  J. Geophys. Res.
       75:2939-2945,1970.
 19. Edmondson, W.T.,Eutrophication in North America,
       124 — 149,  In  Eutrophication: Causes,
       Consequences, Correctives, National Academy of
       Sciences, Washington, D.C., 1969.
 20. Edmondson, W.T., Phosphorus, nitrogen and algae in
       Lake  Washington  after  diversion  of sewage,
       Science 169:690-691,1970.
 21. Edmondson, W.T.  and D.E.  Allison,  Recording
       densitometry pf X-radiographs for the study of
       cryptic  laminations  in  the  sediment of  Lake
       Washington,  Limnol.  Oceanog.  15:138—144,
       1970.
 22. Crecelius,  E.A. and  D.Z. Piper,  Unpublished
       manuscript, Department of Oceanography,
       University of Washington, Seattle, 1971.
 23.Mackereth,  F.J.H., Chemical  investigation of lake
       sediments and their  interpretation, Proc.  Roy.
       Soc. (London) B 161:245-309,1965.
 24. Cholak, J., L.J.  Schafer, and R.F. Hoffer, Results of
       a  five-year  investigation  of  air  pollution  in
       Cincinnati,  A.M.A.  Arch.  Indust.   Hyg.
       6:314-325,1952.
 25.Puget Sound Task Force of the Pacific Northwest
       River  Basins  Commission, Puget  Sound and
       Adjacent Waters, Appendix III, Hydrology and
       Natural Environment, 205,1970.
 26. Johnson,   R.E.,  A.T.  Rossano, Jr.,  and   R.O.
       Sylvester, Dustfall  as a source  of water quality
       impairment, J.S.ED.,  Proc.   Am.  Soc.  Civil
       Engineers 92:245-267,1966.
 27. Goldberg,  ED., The oceans  as a chemical system,
       3-25, In M.N. Hill (ed.), The Sea, Vol. 2, The
       Composition of Sea-Water,  Comparative and
       Descriptive  Oceanography, Wiley-Interscience,
       1963.
28.Turekian,  K.K.  and M.R. Scott, Concentrations  of
       Cr,  Ag,  Mo,  Ni,  Co, and  Mn  in  suspended
       material in  streams, Environ. Sci. Technol.
       1:940-942,1967.

-------
        BIOLOGICAL  UPTAKE  AND  DISTRIBUTION  OF
                                  LEAD  IN  ANIMALS*
                                             J. Abdelnour
                                         University of Illinois
                                      Urbana-Champaign, Illinois
  The widespread use and distribution of heavy metals
and other contaminants in the environment have created
the need for the development of models that are able to
predict  the  uptake,  accumulation and  distribution of
these  contaminants in living organisms. These models,
when  coupled with studies on effects  and  alterations
that  these   contaminants  might   inflict  on   the
environment  and its  components, become  extremely
valuable to the decision maker.
  Part of the effort undertaken by the interdisciplinary
study of heavy  metals, currently taking place at the
University of  Illinois under grant from the National
Science  Foundation, is to develop predictive  models for
heavy metals in general, and lead in particular. This
paper will present a model that has been developed in
the modeling team of the heavy metal study. The  basic
concepts of the model are general enough to make  them
applicable to  many  biological  uptake and retention
phenomenas.  The model belongs to a  class, usually,
known as compartmental models or,  more specifically,
first order linear  models. The first order assumption, in
the studies  of biological uptake and accumulation, was
suggested for radionuclides and other heavy metals by
the   International   Commission   on   Radiological
Protection (1). Many models of this type  have  been
developed for a variety of purposes, ranging from milk
contamination in cows by radionuclides (2, 3), to  DDT
accumulation (4), to  retention of ingested elements by
animals (5).
  The following  model  is  a  multi-compartment, first
order linear model to study the uptake, retention, and
elimination of heavy metals by animals. Conceptually, it
is  applicable to all mammals and most contaminants.
The body is divided into as many organs of interest as
desired,  and different types of input are considered. The
main  emphasis  here will  be  on  lead.  The   basic
assumptions of the model are:
 *Sponsored by National Science Foundation, NSF IRRPOS
  GRANT GI-26 and NSF RANN GRANT GI-31605.
1. The transfer of the contaminant, namely lead, within
  the animal is accomplished via the blood.
2. The  uptake  and  elimination  of  the contaminant
  follow a  first order law.  This  implies that the
  instantaneous transfer rate from any given organ is
  directly proportional to the  amount present in the
  organ.
Mass equilibrium is satisfied at any given organ, and for
the body as a whole.
  Figure  1 shows a schematic diagram of the physical
flow of lead within the body. In this particular model,
two types of input are considered. The lead from air via
respiration, and the lead ingested with food and water.
Other possible  modes are neglected. Three types  of
output are also considered. These are  the output via the
urine, feces,  and lead exhaled. Other means  of output
are neglected.
  The    conceptual    or    compartmental    model
corresponding to Figure  1 is shown in Figure 2. In this
particular  abstraction,  the function  of an organ  is
separated from its physical  entity. The concentration of
lead in the urine is assumed, here, to be proportional to
the  concentration of lead in  the blood rather than the
concentration of lead in the tissue of the kidney. Other
interpretations could be used. The mathematical model
describing the uptake and elimination of lead, as derived
from Figure  2, is  given by a set of first order linear
differential  equations with constant  parameters. Each
equation  satisfies equilibrium at  a  given organ. Each
equation  states that the rate of change in accumulation
within a given organ, is equal to the uptake rate minus,
the elimination rate.
The input rates to the system
R1
          Rair =N(BR)  • (CA) • (XA)
          fd
               n=l
                  (IRn)
                       (Xn)
(1)

(2)
                                                   55

-------
56
   CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
The output rates from the system are given as
FE   >.f  iBLi
                            Rfd>
   FE   Xf  • (BLI + i  (CEn) •  (InI •  (1   Xn)      (3)
                 n=l

               UR  AU (BL)                   (4)
The  equilibrium equations describing the behaviour of

the system are:
       d(Kl) =
                    KD + X'KI
                                     (5)
                                                     -^  -XL •  (L) + X'L •  (BL)
                                                            d(BO)
-*BO
                          X'BO
                                                              d(T)
                                                         = -xM •  (M) + x'M


                                                         = -XSP •  (SP) + X'sP •  (BL)


                                                         - -XT •  m + X'T • (BL)
 (6)



 (7)


 (8)


 (9)


(10)
d(BL) = -  d(KI) - d(L) -  d(BO) -  d(M) - d(SP) - d(T)



       +  Rair + R'fd    *'u (BL)   X1 f (BL)
                          AIR  INHALED
                                                                INGESTION
AIR FXHALED T
-* 	 IRESP. TRACT]




BLOOD
\
IG.I. TRACT) —
/^~~


. 	 , EXCRETION

                , _ ,  , _ , , _ ,  , _ ,
                |LIVER|  |BONE| |MUSCLE|  |SPLEEN|
                                                                      .EXCRETION
                           Figure 1.  Schematic of physical flow of lead in the body.
                           Figure 1. Compartmental model of flow of lead in body.

-------
                                                             LEAD   BIOLOGICAL TRANSPORT
                                                          57
Where:
  KI, L, BO, M, SP, BL represent the amount of lead,
respectively, in the Kidney, Liver, Bone, Muscle, Spleen,
and Blood.
  T  represents the amount of lead in all other tissues,
organs,  and  sinks  not  included in the  model.  The
inclusion   of   this   conceptual   organ  allows  the
conservation of equilibrium in the whole system.
  UR, FE represent  the amount of lead respectively in
the urine and feces.
  Xi represent the rate constant for the transfer of lead
from organ i to the blood.
  ^ i represent  the rate  constant for the transfer of lead
from the blood to organ i.
  A1!!, X*f represent respectively, the rate constant for
the  transfer  of lead from the blood to the urine and
feces.
  Rfd represent the  rate input of lead to the body from
food and water.
  R^d,  R1^  represent the rate input of lead  to the
blood from food and air, respectively.
  BR represent breathing rate.
  CA represent concentration of lead in air.
  XA represent the  fraction of lead  from air absorbed
into the blood.
  IRn represent the ingestion rate of food type n.
  CEn represent the concentration of lead in food  type
n.
  Xn represent the  fraction of lead  absorbed into the
blood from food type n.
Relative to a given input and the rate constants Xi, and
X1 j, the model will yield the concentration of lead in the
various organs at any given time.
  In matrix form the above system of equations can be
written as
               dX  = AX +  B
               dt
(12)
 Where: X is the vector of concentration in organs.
        A a square matrix of rate constants
        B a vector of input rates
 If matrix A  is  known, then the analytical solution  to
 equation  (12) is  found in  any book  on differential
 equations (6). The solution is a sum of exponentials  of
 the form:
            X = ^ Cj Zj eKJ-t - A-'B

 Where: J is the dimension of the vector X.
        K an eigen value of matrix A
        Z the corresponding eigen vector
        C a constant depending on initial conditions
 Other methods of solution for the system are available
 through the use of numerical integration routines readily
 available on computers.
  An experiment  on rats was devised to be  used  in
conjunction  with the model described by Equations (1)
to (11). The purpose of the experiment is twofold:
1. to validate the model or suggest modifications.
2. to determine the rate constants of the model, in this
   case for rats.
  Dr. R. M. Forbes, of the Animal Science Laboratory,
designed and  implemented  the  experiment  with his
assistants. In  brief,  the experiment  consisted of 240
adult male albino  rats. These rats were  divided into six
groups, where each group  was  fed for a total  of eight
weeks  a given level of lead. The  levels chosen were 0, 20,
40, 80, 160, and 320 ppm lead. Rats on each level were
killed at 0, 1,  2, 4, 8 weeks interval. The remaining rats
were all fed for a total of eight additional weeks on the 0
lead basol,  with  some  being  killed  at  similar  time
intervals.  Tissues  were  prepared for analysis  by wet
ashing, dry  ashing for bones.  Lead determination was
made  by  either atomic absorption or anodic stripping
voltametry (7). For the  purposes of  the  model, six
organs were examined for lead concentration at the time
intervals specified above; the organs  are: Bone, Liver,
Muscle, Kidney, Spleen, and Blood.
  All the  data have been collected as of this date, but
the analysis required to determine the role constants and
validate the  model is not yet completed, and, therefore,
no final  conclusion  can be  reached at  this  stage.
Nevertheless,   during   the  data   collection,  some
experimentation on the model was made. The approach
taken was to assume certain values for the rate constants
(i.e. X and  X1), compile  the predicted concentrations,
and compare  them with the reported concentrations;
then readjust the rate constants and repeat the process,
until the predicted values were matching, satisfactorily,
the measured  concentrations that were available. This
process of calibration was accomplished using CSMP on
an  IBM 360/75 of the  University of  Illinois. The final
tuning of the  model, using this trial and error  method,
was stopped  when the complete data were available.
Regression analysis is being used now.
  Figure 3 to  Figure 8 show the results of the initial
effort  for a level of input of 360 ppm lead. The actual
concentrations of lead over time is plotted for all organs,
together with  the concentrations calculated from the
model. All that can be said at  this  stage, is  that the
preliminary results from the model look very  promising.

-------
58
CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
  ppm
    012345678
                     TIME IN  WEEKS
                           KIDNEY
  Figure 3. Predicted and actual concentration of lead.
                                         ppm

                                         7
                                         6

                                         5
                                         4
                                         3
                                         2
                                         1
                                                               	 PREDICTED
                                                               	 ACTUAL
                                                                   I    I     I    I     I    I
                                          012345678
                                                    TIME  IN  WEEKS
                                                         SPLEEN
                                        Figure 5. Predicted and actual concentration of lead.
                                                      ppm
                   	 PREDICTED
                   	 ACTUAL

                   I	I    I     I
                              I
                                         0.7

                                         0.6
                                         0.5
                                         0.4
                                         0.3
                                         0.2
                                         0.1
                                                                	 PREDICTED
                                                                	ACTUAL
     012345678              0
                  TIME IN  WEEKS
                      BLOOD
  Figure 4. Predicted and actual concentration of lead.      Figure
                                                 1
8
       23456
       TIME  IN  WEEKS
          MUSCLE
6.  Predicted and actual concentration of lead.

-------
                                                          LEAD - BIOLOGICAL TRANSPORT
                                                                                 59
   ppm
  35

  30

  25

  20

  15

  10

   5
PREDICTED

ACTUAL
    012345678
               TIME  IN  WEEKS
                    BONE

  Figure 7. Predicted and actual concentration of lead.
p
1.75
1.50
1.25
1.00
0.75
0.50
0.25
C
am
nnrpi i^*v^r*
	 ACTUAL
/ \ x — ..
/ s x ^~-~-^
.' \ S 	 - ~-i ^ __j 	

~t/
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
112345678
                                                TIME IN WEEKS

                                                     LIVER

                                   Figure 8.  Predicted and actual concentration of lead.
REFERENCES
1. Report  of Committee  II  on Permissible Dose  for
    Internal Radiation, Published for the International
    Commission on Radiological Protection, Pergamon
    Press, 1959.
2. Miller,   C.  F.,  The  Contamination  of Milk  by
    radionuclides in fall out,  Prepared for Office  of
    Civil Defense, Department  of Defense, Washington,
    D. C. by Stanford Research Institue, Oct. 1963.
3. Miller,  C. F. and S. L. Brown, Models for estimating
    the   absorbed   dose   from    assimilation   of
    radionuclides in body organs of humans, Prepared
    for Office of Civil Defense, Department of Defense,
    Washington, D. C. by Stanford Research Institute,
    May  1963.
                                 4. O'Neill, R. V. and  D. W. Burke, A Single Systems
                                     Model for DDT and DDE Movement in the Human
                                     Food   Chain,   Ecological   Sciences  Division
                                     publication No. 415  ORNL  IBP - 71 - 9, Nov.
                                     1971.
                                 S.Goldstein,  R.   A.  and  J.  W.  Elwood,  A  two
                                     compartment,  three  parameter model for  the
                                     absorption  and retention of ingested elements by
                                     animals, Ecology, Vol. 52, No. 5,1971.
                                 6. Braner,  F  and  J. A.  Nohel, Ordinary  Differential
                                     Equations, W.  A. Benjamin Inc., New York, 1967.
                                 7. Environmental   Studies  Program,   Environmental
                                     Pollution  by  Lead  and  Other  Metals, Progress
                                     Report, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign,
                                     April 30,1972.

-------
           PANEL DISCUSSION
EFFECTS AND ESTABLISHMENT OF CRITERIA

-------
         EFFECTS  AND  DEVELOPMENT  OF  CRITERIA
          AND  THE ESTABLISHMENT  OF  STANDARDS
                                             H. WISER
                                 Environmental Protection Agency
                                          Washington, D. C.
  We are primarily  concerned with the effects on man.
The effects on man's welfare, such as the effects  on
vegetation, the quality of his waters, beaches, parks, or
quality of the paint finish  on his car or home,  are of
secondary importance. The people who study effects try
to get quantitative  information, as best as possible, on
the level  of the pollutant and the effect caused by that
level; this is an extremely difficult thing to do. A lot of
information, look at the upper end of the curve  if you
were to plot effects versus level, might be obtained from
mortality statistical tables, or from occupational  health
tables. Perhaps a lot of information could be obtained
from studies  with  large overdoses, or  even  moderate
doses, using animals in the laboratory or other types of
organisms. Lesser  amounts  of data  are  obtained  by
studying  the  effects caused by low doses over  longer
periods   of   time.  For  example:  The  effects   of
atmospheric pollution due to smoking may not come up
for twenty, thirty, or forty  years, if at all. Yet we know
that there are some people who may be affected within a
few years, and once the damage is done it is extremely
critical.  The  experimenters  who look at these  subtle
effects  really don't have much  time.  If  we look at
genetic effects, there certainly is not much time. It's
hard to accelerate studies like this. We use animals that
have smaller life cycles and continue studies of that sort.
On man himself, we have to try to postulate what will
happen. We get data from children who are sick,  and as
in other organisms, the  young are more susceptible to
damage by pollutants than the adults. The experimenters
or researchers "home in" on such numbers as parts per
million or per billion. Many of these experiments are
being  conducted by epidemiologists  where there is a
great  deal  of  statistics  involved. When  orders  of
magnitude are closely  studied, the threshold (not j_
threshold) can be selected for protecting man. We are
talking about  parts per billion over a range of six  orders
of magnitude, say from one part in a thousand to a part
per billion, and if when we are able to "home in" within
a factor of two or three, I think we're doing an excellent
job. When we look at these numbers within the agency,
we try to pick a good trade-off. Now let me back off a
minute. When I say  a trade-off I do  not  mean  a
compromise. I mean a practical  trade-off. For example,
are  we to protect every single  individual? If the data
come from  statistics, we really can't. We really have no
feel for that. On the other hand, if we know that it is
very economic to have a standard set at a certain level,
because that level is approximately where the polluters
are operating, and this is what man can tolerate, we have
a high degree of confidence that our numbers are right,
even though there are low-level effects and some effects
the  level of which we're not quite sure. If you look at
that, that is an easy way out. Then you might say that,
10 percent  or five percent or one  percent or even one
part in a thousand of our population is really going to be
affected, especially the young. We do try to protect as
much as possible of the population, however, most levels
might be where you're protecting 99.99 percent of the
population  if possible. It's true  that we do exist in this
environment. It is also true that we don't want to give
up  our standard of  living  or  the way  we  live. For
example, the automobile. None of us is willing to give up
the  automobile because of lead pollution, even though
about 50,000 people a year lose their lives in accidents.
We're not willing to make that trade-off. So these are the
things to  consider.  Now  the  people  who  set  the
standards  start  off  with  what  we call  a criteria
document,  which  is  a  document put  together  to
represent the total important knowledge on that subject.
When I say  important, I mean that the people who have
put these documents together are usually large groups of
people. EPA sometimes does it  in-house. We do it with
the   National  Academy  of Science;  we'll  use  other
organizations. We'll use a lot of other consultants. What
really comes out of  it is really an academic tone, so to
speak; almost a handbook  or encyclopedia of that
particular pollutant, listing what its sources are, what its
                                                  61

-------
62
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
transport mechanism is, its chemistry, its physics, how it
affects man, how if affects the environment, how it is
measured, perhaps how it may be controlled, or do we
have a control? If we know that something is extremely
harmful we still may not be able to measure it because
such a small amount hurts us. We may not be able to
control  it.  It  may be beyond the technology, yet we
know  we  do  have to  protect  ourselves;  and  this
document is what we call a criteria document. It has all
the information in it, as best we know, which has come
from  all the knowledgeable  people and knowledgeable
sources. When I say total important knowledge, I mean
that we have certainly distilled what is in the literature.
We cannot of course afford to, nor are we interested in,
even though we do  read  every word or we think the
people  who put  these  together  read  every piece of
literature, but  they certainly do not  combine all of it.
They  really digest and use the important ones. And they
do  come up with recommendations. Finally, looking at
it  from many viewpoints, from the  viewpoint of the
person who wants to protect the last man, as to how low
a standard should be, to  one who is very practical, who
is interested in what the  economic cost or  risk benefit
trade-offs might be,  or as is stated  in the new water
legislation, to  use the best practical means and later on
the best technological available means perhaps regardless
of cost within reason,  of course, and this  is how our
standards are set. Let me make a comment about that. I
think  we could almost get rid of a  great  deal of our
pollution. For example, this is not too far-fetched,  it is
 not  economic  to  use  plasma  arc and essentially ionize
 everything we  have. Of course we will still come  out
 with the  basic elements, but we will have gotten rid of
 the  pollutants in many undesirable forms like pesticides,
 or bacteria, or  other toxic substances. There are ways of
 doing it; of course, we cannot afford that. We do try to
 put  together standards on a  rational basis from many
 viewpoints, and when  the various people, or people who
 have interests in these  things, come  together, by the way
 these documents are standards before they are set, even
 are promulgated, the agency as well as other  agencies or
 other things do hold hearings  and all the information is
 put  together.  Finally, it  is the responsibility of the
 administrator of the EPA  to set a standard and then it
 becomes law.  One of  the  things I forgot to  mention is
 that knowing the  sources of a given pollutant, we then
 have to decide  how  we ration this.  If you want to keep
 the ambient air down, and we know all the sources in a
 given region, we have to ration that amount of that type
 of pollutant among all the sources. That is a tough
 decision. With  regard to what a man might take in; we
 don't just look at what comes in through the water or
 through the air, but also what is he taking in through the
food. How much normally exists  in his body? How much
 does his body retain, and how much does his body take
 out? Just  because a  pollutant  level  is extremely high in
the body doesn't mean that it has an effect on it. Maybe
 it has no el'tect, and we really try to look at the effects.
 Then make these trade-offs and then finally come  up
 with these standards.

-------
         EFFECTS  AND  ESTABLISHMENT  OF  CRITERIA
                                            T. E. LARSON
                                      Illinois State Water Survey
                                            Urbana, Illinois
  Time  does not permit a detailed discussion of the
 effects of the various parameters, or an enumeration of
 numbers recommended as criteria. I should prefer to
 discuss and  quote the general rationale involved in the
 establishment of criteria for sources of water for public
 water supplies, because it is  important  to  understand
 how the numbers were derived.
 CRITERIA
  The establishment of criteria represents an attempt to
 quantify water quality in terms of its physical, chemical,
 biological  and  aesthetic  values.   The  problem  of
 establishing criteria lies with the availability of objective
 and subjective data.
  To the extent that scientific data are available, the
 evaluations for the derivation  of recommendations may
 be overly restrictive and pose  an unnecessary economic
 burden, or they  may provide  only a limited protection
 from the hazards that they are  intended to prevent. If
 adequate criteria for recommendations are available, and
 the analytical identifications and monitoring procedures
 are  sound,  the  fundamentals  are  then available  to
 establish effective  standards. At  this  step, political,
 social, and economic factors enter into the decision.
 QUALITY CRITERIA FOR PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY
 SOURCES
  Modern water management techniques and  a wide
 variety  of available  water treatment  processes make
 possible the  use  of raw water of almost any quality to
 produce  an  acceptable public water supply. For  this
 reason it is both possible and desirable to consider water
 management alternatives  and  treatment  procedures in
 making recommendations  on the quality of raw water to
 be   used  for   public  supply.  Furthermore,  these
 recommendations must be consistent with the effort and
 money it is reasonable to expect an individual, company,
 or municipality to expend to  produce  a  potable water
supply.  Defining a  reasonable  effort,  including  the
treatment process, involves consideration  of the  present
quality of water, the degree of improvement  in  raw
water that is attainable within the bounds of natural and
man-made  controls on  water quality. Therefore,  in
evaluating  the  basis  for  the recommendations that
follow,  the Panel  left water management alternatives
open wherever possible, but it did make certain arbitrary
assumptions about  the treatment process.
THE DEFINED TREATMENT PROCESS
  Surface   water   supplies   characteristically  contain
suspended sediment in varying amounts and are subject
to bacterial and viral  contamination. Therefore, it was
assumed that the following defined treatment, and no
more, would be given raw surface water by a qualified
operator prior to human consumption:
1. coagulation  (less  than about 50 milligrams per liter
  (mg/1) alum, ferric  sulfate, or copperas with alkali or
  acid addition as necessary, but without coagulant aids
  or activated carbon);
2. sedimentation (six hours or less);
3. rapid sand filtration (three gallons per square foot per
  minute or more);
4. disinfection  with chlorine (without consideration to
  concentration or  form of chlorine residual).
  The  panel recognized  that, on  one hand, some raw
surface waters will meet current Federal Drinking Water
Standards  with no  treatment other  than  disinfection,
and that, on the other hand, almost any water, including
sea water and grossly polluted fresh water, can be made
potable for a  price,  by treatment  processes already
developed.  However,  the  defined treatment outlined
above is  considered reasonable  in view of both  the
generally attainable  quality  of raw surface waters, and
the  protection made imperative by the current practice
of using  streams  to transport and degrade wastes.
Assumption  of   the  defined   treatment   process
throughout  this report is  not  meant to  deny  the
availability,  need,   or  practicality   of other  water
treatment processes.
  Unlike surface waters, ground waters characteristically
contain little or no  suspended sediment, and are largely
free  and  easily protected  from  bacterial  and  viral
contamination. See  Ground Water Characteristics below
                                                   63

-------
64
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
for  significant  exceptions.   Therefore,  no   defined
treatment is assumed  for raw  ground water designated
for use  as a public supply, although this does not deny
the  availability,  need,  or  practicality of  treatment.
Ground waters should meet  current  Federal Drinking
Water    Standards   in    regard   to   bacteriological
characteristics and  content  of toxic substances, thus
permitting an acceptable public water supply to be
produced with no  treatment, providing natural water
quality  is adequate in other respects. Unless specified
otherwise, the water quality recommendations apply to
both  surface water  and ground  water sources.
WATER QUALITY RECOMMENDATIONS
  The Panel has defined water  quality recommendations
as those limits of characteristics and concentrations of
substances in raw waters that will allow the production
of  a  safe, clear,  potable,  aesthetically pleasing  and
acceptable  public  water supply after treatment. In
setting  these recommendations, the  Panel  recognized
that  most  of  the  surface  water   treatment  plants,
providing water for domestic use in  the United States,
are relatively  small. They  do not  have  sophisticated
technical  controls, and  are  operated  by  individuals
whose training in  modern  methods varies widely in
extent.
  The  recommendations of  the  public water supply
panel  should  not  be construed as latitude  to  add
substances  to  waters where  the existing  quality is
superior  to  that  called  for in  the  recommendations.
Degradation of raw water sources of quality higher than
that specified should be minimized in order to preserve
operational safety  factors and economics of treatment.
  The Panel considered factors of safety for each of the
toxic substances  discussed, but  numerical  factors of
safety were  employed only where data are available on
the known no-effect level or the minimum effect level of
the substances on humans. These factors were selected
on  the basis of the degree of hazard and the fraction of
daily  intake, of each  substance, that can reasonably be
assigned to water.
  The recommendations should be regarded as guides in
the control of health hazards, and  not  as fine lines
between safe and dangerous concentrations. The  amount
and  length   of   time,  by  which   figures   in   the
recommendations may be exceeded  without injury to
health,  depends  upon the  nature of the  contaminant,
whether  iugh  concentrations, even  for short  periods,
produce  acute  poisoning,  whether the  effects  are
cumulative,  how frequently  high  concentrations occur,
and how long they  last.  All these factors must be
considered in deciding  whether a hazardous situation
exists.
  Although some  of the toxic  substances considered are
known  to be associated  with  suspended solids, in raw
surface waters, which might be  removed, to some extent,
by  the defined treatment process, the degree of removal
of the various soluble toxic substances is not generally
known; and even if known, it could not be assured under
present treatment  practices. Therefore, in the interest of
safety, it was usually assumed that there is no removal of
toxic substances  as  a result  of the defined treatment
process.
  Substances  not  included   in the  report  are  not
necessarily innocuous in public water supply sources. It
would be impractical to  prepare a compendium of all
toxic,  deleterious, or  otherwise  unwelcomed agents,
both  organic and inorganic,  that may enter a surface
water  supply.  In specific locations  it  may  become
necessary to  determine the presence  of substances not
considered  in  the   report,  particularly  where  local
pollution indicates  that  the  substance may  have  a
significant effect  on  the  beneficial  use of water for
public supplies.
  In summary: the recommendations  in the report for
raw  water quality for  public supplies assure  that the
water will be  potable, for surface water, with the defined
treatment process; for ground water, with no treatment
whatsoever. For waters zoned for public supply, but not
meeting   the  recommendations in  all  respects,  the
recommendations  can be  considered a  minimum target
toward which efforts at upgrading the quality should be
directed.  In some instances, the natural quality of raw
water  may  make meeting  certain  recommendations
impractical, or even impossible.  For constituents for
which this is  the case, and where health is not  a factor,
the natural quality  of the water can  be  considered  a
reasonable target toward which  to  work, although
determination   of   natural   quality   may   require
considerable  effort, expense, and time. Wherever water
quality  is found  superior  to  that  described in the
recommendations, efforts should be made to minimize
its degradation.
GROUND WATER CHARACTERISTICS
  Development of water  quality recommendations for
ground  water bodies must provide for the significant
differences between  surface  water and ground water.
Ground  water  is  generally not confined in a discrete
channel.  Its quality can be measured, in any detail, with
difficulty and at  great  expense. A  thorough knowledge
of the hydrologic characteristics  of  the ground water
body may be obtained after extensive study. Movement
of ground water can be extremely slow; so that pollution
occurring today  in   one  part  of an  aquifer may not
become  evident at a point of withdrawal for several,
tens, hundreds, or even thousands of years.
  Wastes  mix differently  with  ground waters than they
do  with surface waters. Where  allowance  for a mixing
zone, in  the immediate vicinity of a waste outfall, can be
provided  for  in  surface  water standards, under the
assumption that  mixing is  complete  within  a  short
distance  downstream, dispersion of waste,  in a ground
water body,  may  not be  complete  for many years. The

-------
                                                                            PANEL DISCUSSION
                                                  65
long retention time will facilitate bacterial or chemical
reactions with aquifer components that result in removal
or decomposition of a pollutant to the point where it no
longer degrades the aquifer. Because these reactions are
imperfectly known  and  cannot  be predicted at the
present time, it is necessary to monitor the movement of
waste  in  a  ground  water body  from  the point  of
introduction outward.  Unlike  bodies of  surface water,
bodies of ground water cannot be monitored adequately
by sampling at the point of use.
  Inadvertent or careless contamination of fresh ground
water  bodies is occurring today from the leaching  of
accumulated salts from irrigation, animal  feed lots, road
salt, agricultural fertilizers, and dumps and landfills; or
from leakage of sewerlines in sandy soil, septic tank
effluents, petroleum  product  pipelines,  and chemical
waste lagoons.  Another source of contamination is the
upward movement of saline water in improperly plugged
wells and drill holes, or  as the result of excessive
withdrawal  of ground water. Deep-well injection causes
intentional  introduction  of  wastes into  saline ground
water bodies.
   Because of their common use as private water supplies
in rural areas, all geologically unconfined, water-table,
aquifers could be placed in a classification comparable to
that  for  raw  surface  waters used  for public water
supplies. Even though not all waters in these aquifers are
suitable for  use without treatment, such classification
could  be  used to prohibit introduction of wastes into
them.  This  would restrict the use of landfills and other
surface  disposal   practices.   Limited  use  of   the
unsaturated zone  for disposal of wastes  would still  be
acceptable,  provided  that  decomposition  of  organic
wastes  and  sorption  of pollutants, in  the  zone  of
aeration,  were essentially complete before  the  drain
water reached the water table. Bodies of artesian ground
water, in present use  as public  and private supplies,
could  be  similarly  classified wherever  their  natural
source of recharge was sufficient to sustain  the current
yield and  quality.
   Disposal of wastes, in  either of the above types  of
aquifers,  could be expressly forbidden on the basis  of
their   classification    as   public   water    supplies.
Furthermore, before  disposal  of wastes  to  the soil  or
bedrock adjacent to aquifers  used  or usable for public
supply  were permitted,  it could  be required that  a
geologic reconnaissance be made to determine possible
effects on ground water quality.
  Water   quality  recommendations, for  raw  ground
waters to be used for  public water supplies, are more
restrictive than water quality recommendations, for raw
surface water sources, because of the assumption that no
treatment  will be given  to  the  ground waters.  The
distinction  between  surface   and  ground  waters  is,
therefore,  necessary  for  proper  application  of the
recommendations. In certain cases, this distinction is not
easily made. For example, collector wells in shallow river
valley alluvium, wells tapping cavernous limestone, and
certain other types of shallow wells may intercept water
only a short  distance away, or after only a brief period
of travel, from the point at which it was  surface water.
Springs used  as  raw water sources present a similar
problem.  Choice  of  the  appropriate  water  quality
recommendations, to apply to such raw  water sources,
should be based on the individual situation.

WATER MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
  The    purpose   of   establishing   water   quality
recommendations  and, subsequently, establishing water
quality  standards is to protect the nation's water from
degradation,  and  provide a basis for improvement of
their quality. These actions  should not preclude the use
of good water management practices. For  example, it
may be possible to supplement streamflow with ground
water pumped from wells,  or to replace ground water
removed from an aquifer with surface  water through
artificial recharge. These  other sources of water may be
of lower quality than the water originally present, but it
should remain a management choice whether this lower
quality  is preferable to no water at all. In arid parts of
the nation, water management practices of this sort have
been  applied for  many  years  to  partially  offset the
effects  of  mining of  ground water.  Example,  its
withdrawal  at a faster rate than it can be  recharged
naturally.
  It is possible, by merely removing ground water from
the aquifer, to degrade the quality of that remaining, by
inducing recharge  from a surface or ground  water body
of lesser quality. It does not seem reasonable to forbid
the use of the high-quality water that is there because of
this potential degradation. Of what value is it if it cannot
be used?
  It would appear, that degradation by choice might be
an  alternative  under  certain  conditions  and within
certain limits.  This  type  of  degradation  is  not
comparable to that resulting from disposal of wastes in
the water body. It is simply the price exacted for using
the  water.  In  the  case of  mining without artificial
recharge, the philosophy involved is  the same as  that
applied to the mining of other  nonrenewable resources
such as metal ores or fossil fuels. Because considerations
of recreation and aesthetics, and the maintenance of fish
and  wildlife  are generally not involved in this kind of
management situation, it is reasonable that water quality
standards should  provide for the mining and artificial
recharge of  bodies  of ground water zoned for public
supply. As in any water management program, it would
be necessary to understand the hydrologic system and to
monitor changes induced in the system by management
activities.
  Preservation of  water  management  choices can be
protected by water use classification. Classification of
surface waters has not been based solely on the fact that
those waters  are  being used for  public  supply at the

-------
66          CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
present  time.  Presumably, it has  been based on the    in use for that purpose. Conversely, failure to zone a
decision that the body  of water in question should be    body of water for  public supply would not necessarily
usable for public supply with no more than the routine    preclude its use for that purpose. Selective zoning could
forms of water treatment, whether or not it is presently    thus  be used  to  assure  desirable water management.

-------
                      HUMAN STUDIES LABORATORY
                                             G. J. LOVE
                                U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                               Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
  Within the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the
Human  Studies  Laboratory  (HSL) has  been given
primary responsibility  for  developing  the health
intelligence necessary for the establishment of adequate
environmental  quality  standards.  This  task is
complicated  by  the  fact  that little  information is
available concerning the following topics:
1. What  are  the  toxic  materials  now  present in  the
  environment?
2. What is the potential for newly developed materials
  being  toxic, particularly  as  a  result of long-term
  exposure to low levels?
3. If a screening  procedure suggests  a high  toxicity
  potential  for particular  materials,  how  do  we
  determine  levels  of environmental  exposure? (This
  may not be HSL's responsibility, but  the knowledge is
  vital if any kind of  priorities for studies are to be
  established.)
4. What is the significance of the various formulations of
  a toxic substance, example, how do  the physical and
  chemical properties of the various compounds relate
  to its toxicity?
  Assuming  that  estimates of  these  factors  can  be
developed,  additional  concern  must  be given  to
measurements of  total intake and routes of intake as
well as to absorption, distribution, storage and excretion
of the individual material.
  Finally, the Human  Studies  Laboratory  must  be
concerned with the entire biologic spectrum of response
that may occur as a result of exposure. This is illustrated
by the following figure.
SIGNIFICANT
   HEALTH
   EFFECT

     J.
       L
MORBIDITY
\
      /   PHYSIOLOGIC
     /      CHANGES
    / HERALDING ILLNESS
  / PHYSIOLOGIC CHANGE \
 /            Of             ^
/  UNCERTAIN SIGNIFICANCE
r
INCREASED  POLLUTANT BURDEN
                                              \
                      PROPORTION OF
                 -*	*-
                   POPULATION  AFFECTED


  Responding to these  needs is the  goal of the EPA,
Human  Studies Program. Obviously,  there are many
difficulties  and many  problems  not yet solved.  At
present  we are forced to rely heavily on occupational
data that for several reasons are less than satisfactory.
  However, since the need and the obligation to protect
human health surmounts all  other responsibilities,  we
utilize  the  best  data  available  to  develop
recommendations   when  they  are  needed,  and
recommendations  for whatever action appears to  be
necessary  to assure  adequate protection for even the
more  susceptible  or  sensitive  segments  of  our
population.
                                                 67

-------
                 SIGNIFICANT EFFECT OF POLLUTANTS
                                               J. F. COLE
                          International Lead Zinc Research Organization, Inc.
                                            New York, N. Y.
   One of the problems with which we must wrestle in
 the  environmental field,  and especially in the area of
 criteria  establishment,  is  to  determine what is a
 significant effect of a given pollutant. If we can provide
 definition  of  a  significant  effect,  then the  overall
 problem is reduced to monitoring and analysis. I don't
 mean to minimize the difficulties inherent in these areas
 but, we  may bring our  technical expertise to bear on
 these.  Determination of what  constitutes a significant
 effect  involves philosophy and judgment.  Our technical
 skills won't do us much good in these areas.
   What is a significant effect? This is a question of much
 controversy.  Some  would  have  us   believe  that a
 significant effect is any measurable change  in man or the
 environment,  while others hold  that an  effect  is not
 significant unless it produces frank illness in man  or
 measurable harm to the environment. It seems clear that
 the effects on which criteria are established, and upon
 which  standards are eventually set, must be somewhere
 in between these two extremes. Admittedly, the ground
 in between is sometimes extremely broad, and it takes
 wisdom  and  courage to  define criteria and to  set
 standards in this very grey area; yet this is  what must be
 done.  It  takes  wisdom  to  decide  what constitutes
 evidence  of a significant effect. It takes courage to
 withstand the pressures  of  those  who  want no-risk
 criteria and standards, and those who  would have us
 reject even minimal safety factors.
  Those who advocate the no-risk concept often use the
argument  that any substance must be shown to have no
 ill effects  before  it  may be  introduced into  our
 environment,  and environmental contaminants, about
 which  such  information  is  not available,  which  are
 already present must  be  eliminated  or banned. I reject
 this concept because  one  can never prove  the negative;
therefore, it  is impractical.  Further, widespread
acceptance of this concept would cripple our economy
and stifle new developments. Unfortunately, there is a
disturbing tendency toward this point of view, and some
of the  recent stringent regulatory action are a result of
this philosophy. I cite the recent requirements, of the
 Clean  Air  Act, for a 90 percent reduction over 1970
 levels  of NOX, CO and  unburned hydrocarbons in
 automobile exhaust, and the talk about zero discharge in
 the new water pollution act. It is doubtful that there is
 scientific justification  to  support  those,  and  other
 extremely stringent standards; the costs are absolutely
 awesom.
  If we reject the  no-risk  concept,  we must create
 guidelines for  acceptable safety factors. This is no easy
 matter, but I think before we base a criteria on an effect,
 we must ask at least two questions:
 1. Is the effect in question  a detrimental one?  Some
   effects which are attributed to  environmental stresses
   can  be classed as compensatory responses, but may be
   of  no known  detriment  to health. The inhibitory
   effect of lead on erythrocytic-ALA dehydrase may be
   an example of this  type of an effect.
 2. What are the trade-offs? The safest approach is to use
   the  most sensitive  effect as a criterion. However, we
   must take into  consideration the  economic costs of
   controlling to very stringent low levies. We must also
   be concerned about  potential substitutes  which may
   result in environmental  problems  of even greater
   magnitude. An example here is the elimination of lead
   from gasoline, wherein, the costs may be exorbitant in
   terms of higher gasoline prices, lowered fuel economy,
   depletion of petroleum  reserves, and the  possible
  increase of aromatic hydrocarbons into the air.
  I recommend that we base criteria on known harmful
effects,  and  establish  our  safety  factors with full
knowledge  and  consideration of the economic and
environmental   disruption  which  we  may cause  by
over-zealous action.
  In  the  field   of trace  metals,  and  with  other
environmental  contaminants, it is extremely important
that   environmental  effects research, both  under
industrial  and governmental sponsorship, continue.
Providing both governmental  and industrial   funding
assures a balanced interpretation of data. Further action
on pollutants must then be taken, based on  these data,
and the answer to  the two questions: Is  the effect
                                                   69

-------
70          CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS


harmful? Will it do more harm than good  to replace or    more deliberate approach to criteria  establishment and
eliminate the pollutant?                                 standard selling, but an approach which at the same
  If scientists address themselves to these questions and    time, will protect our society and our environment with
provide answers and interpretation, then we may see a    a minimum disruption to our economic well being.

-------
        STATEMENT ON ESTABLISHMENT  OF  CRITERIA
                              FOR METALS IN FOODS
                                            C. F. JELINEK
                         U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
                                          Washington, D. C.
  In the Bureau of Foods program, to assess  the hazards
of toxic elements in foods, we must be governed by the
fact that man  experiences  a finite level of intake of all
the elements in the earth's crust,  as  demonstrated by
their presence  in the human  tissue (1). We are dealing
with materials  that enter food through natural geologic
causes  as  well as  man's  activity.  Our problem is to
determine  what  level of exposure,  from  food,  is
consistent with safety. In the process of determining an
acceptable level of exposure to a metal from any given
food, it is essential to define the level of unavoidable
background exposure from all environmental sources,
such as food, water and air. This is in marked contrast to
criteria  usually  employed  with  a  new  substance
proposed for addition to food or water, where sources of
exposure can be better controlled.
  In our approach to this problem, we feel  we  must,
determine the  overall level of occurrence  of  the toxic
elements in food in order to obtain a good indication of
the natural background  level in food, and  find out
whether specific components of the food supply contain
unusually  high levels, so that potential problems are
readily  identified.  In  determining levels  of  exposure
compatible with health, we must take into account all
sources and routes of exposure.  For example, although
mercury exposure is almost entirely through the diet,
significant exposure to lead can occur from air, water,
industrial exposure and pica.
  In regards to occurrence of a given metal in our food
supply,  we must not only obtain  data on the general
level in  the   total food  supply,  but also develop
information on the frequency distribution in the various
food classes of  the diet  and on  food  consumption
patterns. Our establishment of mercury guidelines of 0.5
ppm in fish was simplified by the fact that they could be
based on methyl mercury toxicity, and on information
concerning  fish consumption, since no other significant
environmental exposures occur. For lead, cadmium, and
other elements that may  be  ubiquitous  in  the food
supply, the  problem  of setting acceptable  intakes
becomes much more  complex. We must not only carry
out surveys of such metals in the principal dietary items,
but  must  also  take  into account that  consumption
patterns differ with age. For example, the diet of very
young infants is almost exclusively milk.
  We must consider the chemicalformandbioavailability
of the metal concerned. Well known effects along these
lines are the increased toxicity and bioavailability of
methyl mercury, and that the form in which arsenic
exists in shrimp is essentially physiologically inactive.
  I would now like to bring you up  to  date on our
surveillance activities on toxic metals in the food supply.
Our general philosophy is to develop a full picture of the
occurrence of the metals of interest  in  food before
setting guidelines, unless a hot spot occurs, in which case
a  specific  guideline  will be set for this  particular
situation,  based  on  the  best  information  at  hand
concerning exposure, bioavailability and toxicity.
  For  example, when  it  became obvious to  us that
dangerous  amounts of lead and cadmium  could be
leached from ceramic ware, because of improper firing,
we established interim guidelines for leachable amounts
of these  metals, and have continued carrying out an
active monitoring program on these items, especially of
imports, which have been the bad actors.
  In  determining the overall level of occurrence, of a
contaminant in the food supply, we conduct continuing
surveys   on the Total  Diet,  which  is based on
consumption data, developed by the USDA, seven years
ago. We analyze composite samples of 12 different food
classes, and calculate  the  intake of a given metal  based
on the average total consumption of a young male adult,
which is appreciably more than that of the average adult.
The  latest information published covers  the  levels of
arsenic and cadmium in the Total Diet from June, 1968
to April, 1970 (2). The average overall level for both of
these metals in the Total Diet was around 0.02  ppm,
which  we  do not regard  as hazardous.  Mercury was
                                                  71

-------
72
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
added  to the Total  Diet  Survey  in  June,  1970, and
selenium, lead, and zinc were added in June of this year.
  We also carry  out a special Fish  Survey to  determine
the levels of contamination in a variety of sea and fresh
water fish. This  fiscal year we have mercury, lead, and
cadmium in our Fish  Survey, and  plan  to add at least
selenium, arsenic, and zinc next fiscal year.
  We also carry out Surveys in a variety of food types to
obtain a clearer  idea of the levels in important foods. I
mentioned to you that  the setting of  a guideline  for
mercury in food  was simplified  by  the fact that it
occurs,  in significant amounts, only in fish. Nevertheless,
we  continued monitoring different food categories  for
mercury to  make  sure that  the  situation had not
changed. Perhaps you have seen the  recent  article  in
Science  (3),  where  we  reported that the  median
concentrations of mercury  in a variety  of foods varied
from less than 0.001  ppm to 0.014 ppm; all  well below
the 0.5  ppm guideline. This year we are carrying out a
similar survey, on cadmium, in a variety of foods.
  In carrying out these surveys, we must be sure we use
reliable  analytical  methods  having satisfactory
sensitivity, accuracy and reproducibility. Dr.  Haenni,  of
the Bureau of Foods, will  go into  this subject in more
depth tomorrow.
  In addition to  developing information  on the levels  of
toxic metals in foods, as described above, we naturally
consider the lexicological  properties  of the  metals.
There has been a great deal of information published on
this  subject,  which  we  take  into  consideration. In
addition,  we  are conducting  active  toxicological
evaluations of mercury, lead, and cadmium ourselves.
  We are devoting considerable analytical, toxicological,
and  inspectional  manpower   to  obtain  accurate
information on overall occurrence of the toxic elements
in foods, and, at the same  time, maintain an alert for
special  trouble  spots which may arise. Our  overall
ambitions are  not small. We plan to move progressively,
from the six metals we  are  now evaluating to those
which we feel pose less hazard, until we have assessed
about 20 in all.
  This is  a much  bigger  program than we  can  push
through all at once. Our  objective has been  to use our
resources  to   concentrate  on  the  most  potentially
hazardous metals first; systematically develop necessary
data  for guidelines,  but  at  the  same  time maintain
flexibility  to   our  approach  to  be   able to provide
protection to  the consumer when a real problem arises.

REFERENCES
1. Tucker, J.,  New Scientist and  Science  Journal, 55,
     728,1971.
1. Duggan  and  Cornelliussen,  Pesticides Monitoring
     Journal, 5, 331, 1972.
3. Tanner, J. T., D. H. Friedmann, D. N. Lincoln, L. A.
     Ford, and M. Jaffel, Science 177,1102,1972.

-------
            BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH IN   SUPPORT  OF
                         CRITERIA  AND  STANDARDS
                                            D. H. K. LEE
                         National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
                         U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
                               Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
  The development of an environmental standard rests
on  the  basic  assumption  that  some  kind  of a
dose-response relationship  can be  developed  for  the
environmental agent in question; that a  curve can be
envisaged  on a  graph  relating  degree  of  exposure,
quantitatively expressed  on the horizontal axis, to
probable effect, quantitatively expressed on the vertical
axis.  It is  the  business of criteria, supporting  the
standard, to  develop and justify the relationship to be so
expressed.
  The assumption is  perfectly valid  in  a conceptual
sense, but  considerable difficulties are often experienced
when  one  tries to apply it to a particular  agent.  Many
intervening factors determine how much of a particular
agent, whose concentration in the  surrounding air, in
drinking water, or in food is known, actually enters into
the body of  the exposed person to constitute the actual
dose.  Previous speakers have dealt with some of these
determinants, and it is clear that the regulatory agencies
and the technical experts,  that they command, have
gotten fairly close  to  methods of  predicting  what
persons, exposed  to a particular situation, will probably
receive. Our  ability to enter the horizontal axis of the
hypothetical  dose-response chart is in reasonably good
shape  and rapidly improving.
  Unfortunately,  we are not in nearly such good  shape
with regard  to the vertical or response axis. It is  not
always clear  even what should be used as the response.
Easily measured reactions, such as the pulse rate, may be
unaffected, or so  influenced by extraneous factors, as to
be  unreliable.  Sick absences  have some  built-in
uncertainties. Subjective complaints like   headache or
loss of appetite are very hard to quantify. No one wants
to wait for  a specific disease to  provide  a measurable
effect.
  Even if we agree  upon the response to be used, it is
very clear that people are far from being equal. A highly
susceptible person may react violently to a dose that
passes unnoticed  by the average person. Children  often
respond more or less readily than their elders. Sex, race,
the physiological  state  at the moment,  co-existent
disease, self-medication, and a host of conditions create
a spectrum  of  human variability that can be broken
down  into arbitrary segments only with some risk of
injustice to the  borderline  instances. Furthermore, one
can look only indirectly  at what goes on in the human
body,  and often  has  to rely on  animal  experiments
which introduce their own problems.
  Our luncheon speaker, Dr. Laitinen, mentioned some
areas of uncertainty about the way in  which metallic
substances  produce adverse effects  and  about the
determinants  of biomedical action. Had he had more
time I am sure that  his list would nave been  much
longer. If you will stand  with me outside of the system
for a moment, and try to follow a  metallic molecule in
its bodily perigrinations, I think you will  see what  I
mean.  If,  on coming from the  outside, the molecule
enters  the lung,  it may  simply  be breathed out  again,
stick on the wall of the large airways, pass through into
the blood stream,  or be passed for some  time from one
macrophage  cell to another. Its  fate depends upon its
size, attachment to a larger particle, immediate toxicity
for a cell, or just pure  chance. Some of the probabilities
are known, but  only some, and these fairly grossly. If it
enters  the alimentary  canal, its  chances of absorption
will vary with its valency, its aggregation,  the presence of
materials with which it  can combine and be removed
from  the  scene,  the  health of the  alimentary wall,
intestinal motility, etc., etc.
  In the bloodstream, after absorption, it may be carried
in solution, be  bound  with lipid or protein, or enter  a
red blood cell.  This  disposition, in turn, will affect the
ease  with which it  can  pass  from  the  blood to
intercellular fluid and then to tissue cells. Whether it can
pass into the cell will depend upon the state of the cell
membrane, the presence  of carriers, and  what the metal
itself does to the cell membrane constituents. As pointed
out by Dr. Abdelnour,  the concentration in the blood is
                                                  73

-------
74
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
both the result  of past  exchanges with cells and  the
determinant of future exchanges; a very complex set of
balances. Within  the cell, the metallic material  may
undergo  various  changes of state; some decreasing its
chance of adverse effects; some  enhancing it. Storage
and release from storage in such material as bone, often
treated as a  simple, reversible, linear process, is in reality
a very complex set of balances and interactions, subject
to much variation.
  Those  molecules that,  as a result of all the foregoing
balances  and exchanges, manage to impinge on a reactive
cell site  may  produce quite  critical events. They  may
combine  with  sulfhydryl  groups  and  change  the
permeability, if not, the  structure of membranes. They
may enter into and  distort enzymic molecules so that
they can no longer bring normal reactants together. Or
they may  provide just  the  metallic  atoms  that  the
enzyme needs  for its structure, in which case  we would
call  them  essential   metals.  They  may  change  the
solubility of  some  reactants, removing  them from
desirable processes. The more one  presses the question,
Just why is this  metal toxic?,  the more uncertain  the
answers  tend  to become.  Finally,  the  process  of
excretion involves a  triple problem of uncertainty. The
cells of excretory organs are vulnerable just  as other
cells; they exercise a  special metabolic relationship with
the material being excreted, and they are often exposed
to much higher concentrations of the material than are
other cells.
  In the  face  of all  this uncertainty, what  is  the
 standard-setter to do? He clearly cannot sit on his hands
 until the research boys make up their minds. If there is
 strong presumptive evidence that an agent is harmful he
 must set some kind of limit which will protect most, if
 not  all. of those who may be exposed to it. He can only
 make the best judgment that he can on the basis  of the
 evidence that he has. He, and the public he serves, must
 recognize that the ideal is approachable only by stages,
 with amendments  introduced as  better  information
 becomes available. After all, we have spent 5000 years
 getting into this mess; but only 5000 days or so worring
 about it. It is a bit much to expect research to  give good
 answers in 5000 hours. However, the standard-setter can
 be  certain of  one thing; whatever judgment he makes
 will  be  attacked,  and evidence  to the  contrary will be
 adduced by those who find the judgment  hard to take.
 To combat pressures, and  to ensure the public of the
 best protection that is justifiable at the time one can
 recommend  just  thiee  things: (a)  that  the various
 environmental agents be placed in some kind of rank
 order as regards importance, severity of effect, number
 of   people   exposed,  relation to  other  exposures,
 feasibility  of control, etc.  (b)  that  those making the
judgment are  permitted  to do so  according to  their
 conscience; regardless of the pressures  and interests of
 those affected, (c) that every opportunity  be given,
 through resources and conditions of work, to those who
 are trying to see toxicologjcal responses and mechanisms
 clearly, so  that still better judgments can be made in the
 future.

-------
      SESSION III
CONTROL PROCESSES
                 Chairman:

                 C. J. Lyons
                 Battelle's Columbus Laboratories

-------
              TRACE  METALS  IN  EFFLUENTS FROM
                     METALLURGICAL  OPERATIONS
              J. B. HALLOWELL, R. H. CHERRY, JR., AND G. R. SMITHSON, JR.
                  The Columbus Laboratories of the Battelle Memorial Institute
                                         Columbus, Ohio
INTRODUCTION
  The purpose  of this  paper  is to list the current
pollution control  techniques  associated with
metallurgical operations,  and to present  some examples
of data describing the behavior of trace metals in waste
streams from smelting operations.
  The approaches taken  to control pollutants in waste
streams in metallurgical  operations  are  shown in  the
summary listing in Table  1 of pollution factors and the
methods of control  applied  to waste  gas  and  water
streams. Two basic, and relatively long-term approaches
to waste  streams are modification of processes  to
minimize or eliminate the waste stream, and segregation
of waste streams to minimize the volume to be treated,
to allow the use of a  specific treatment method, and to
maximize  the  effectiveness  of the treatment. The
modification of processes  generally involves the time and
cost  associated with  research,   development, and
equipment changes,  while the  segregation  of  waste
streams usually  involves alteration  of  existing plant
facilities.
  In  cases where lowering of concentrations of specific
impurities is the  intent,  dilution of waste water with
purer water, or  with a different  waste water, may
achieve conformance  with discharge  limitations. In the
case of waste gas streams, dilution, or dispersion may be
achieved by means of tall stacks. The standard methods
of separating suspended solids from liquid waste streams
and particulates from gas streams are listed in Table 1
and include only traditional devices. The term Inorganics
refers to  dissolved  salts in  liquid streams and  to
particulates and vaporized materials, such as, mercury, in
gas streams. The term Organics refers to BOD, oil, etc.,
in water, and to hydrocarbons and vapors in gas streams.
TRACE METALS IN ELECTROSTATIC
PRECIPITATORS
  The following example  of the behavior of trace metals
in gases and dusts is taken from an exercise carried out
        TABLE 1  METHODS OF CONTROL
  Waste volume
   or nature
      Process modification
     waste stream segregation
                     Water
                     Aii
Concentration
Suspended solids
Inorganics
Organics
Mists and aerosols
Dilution
Settling,
 coagulation
Wet cyclones
Filtration

Centrifuges


Chemical
 oxidation
Reduction
Neutralization
Evaporation
Ion exchange
Electrochemical
 methods
Biological
 treatment
Skimming
Tall stacks
Long flues

Cyclones
Electrostatic
 precipitators
Wet scrubbers
Baghouses
Absorption

Reagent injection
Fabric coatings
Wet scrubber
Solutions
After burners


Catalytic reactors
Electrostatic
 precipitators
Filters
at a combined copper-zinc smelting plant (1). The point
of the exercise  was the recovery of metal values in a
mixture  suitable  for  use in the  existing  process
equipment. The data obtained have been analyzed to
obtain insight into  the behavior of the trace metals in
the control devices.
  A  flowsheet,  depicting the major features of the
metallurgical operation and the dust control equipment
                                                75

-------
76
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
           ZINC
       CONCENTRATES
  COPPER
CONCENTRATES
         SLAB ZINC
         PRODUCT
     Figure 1.  Flowsheet for Cu-Zn smelting plant.
 present before  a  program of  alterations, is  shown  in
 Figure  1. Zinc and copper flotation  concentrates were
 processed  to  electrolytic  zinc  and  blister  copper
 products. The two processes were interrelated by the
 transfer of zinc leach residues  to the copper operation,
 and the transfer of slag-fuming product, ZNO, from the
 copper reverberatory  furnace slags to the zinc operation.
   The alterations  made in the  dust control systems on
 the copper process during the plant revisions are shown
 in  Figure 2.  Initially,  the  gases  from drying  kilns,
 roasters, and reverberatory furnaces were treated in four
 electrostatic  precipitator units  in series.  Converter gases
were  treated  in a separate precipitator  unit.  In  the
altered  arrangement,  the roaster  gases were treated in
half of the  original  precipitator  capacity,  and  the
reverberatory gases were treated in the other half of the
precipitator capacity.  The reverberatory furnace and
converter gases flowed from  their  precipitators to a
baghouse for additional dust recovery.
  Some  of  the characteristics of the  gas streams and
trace metals in  the dusts from this smelting operation are
presented in Table 2. The dryer dusts represent, to a fair
degree,  the  base composition of the  feed to the copper
smelting operations.  (Major constituents such as SiOj,
Fe, S, etc., are omitted for the sake of brevity.) It may
be  noted  that  all  of  the  trace  metals  are more
concentrated,  on a percentage basis, in the fume than in
the feed material.  Cadmium,  lead, and arsenic  undergo
much greater degrees of concentration than  do  the base
metals  copper   and  zinc.  The  trace  metals  are
concentrated in the fume differently in the various steps
of copper smelting.
  The  collection  efficiencies   of  electrostatic
precipitation,  for trace metals under the before and after
conditions of the plant alteration, are given in Table 3.
In the initial condition, a combined stream from dryers,
roasters, and reverberatory  furnaces was treated with an
overall  collection  efficiency  for  particulates  of  75
percent.  Collection  efficiencies  for  the  individual
metallic elements  varied from 40 percent, for cadmium,
to 93  percent  for antimony. When the roaster gas was
segregated to  half the  original precipitator area, overall
collection  efficiency  for  particulates  rose  to 98.9
                  TABLE 2  COPPER-ZINC SMELTER WASTE STREAM CHARACTERISTICS
Metals content, weight % of particulates*
Element

Cu
Zn
Cd
Pb
As
Sb
Ge
Au, oz/ton
Ag, oz/ton
Flow, scf/m
Temp., F
Dust burden.
tons/day
Dryer
dusts
3.3
3.7
0.02
0.6
0.32
0.07
—
0.08
3.42
18,000
325
1

Roaster
dusts
9.3
8.1
1.0
1.5
1.05
0.27
—
0.11
3.03
67,000
350
55

Reverb
dusts
2.7
18.4
0.6
4.9
5.5
1.2
—
0.07
1.89
100,000
1,020
48

Converter
dusts
6.9
28.6
1.14
21.2
2.0
0.71
—
0.12
100,000
800
23


Combined
flowsf
2.8
27.0
0.94
14.1
3.09
0.27
0.001
0.06
330,000
475
38


             'Sulfur, silica, iron, etc., not shown.
             tAfter electrostatic precipitator.

-------
                                                            METALLURGICAL OPERATIONS
                                                                                      77
DRYER —

ROASTER-

REVERB  -
CONVERTER
PRECIPITATORS
   I    I    I
                         BEFORE
 DRYER
 ROASTER
 REVERB
 CONVERTER
                                       Jl
                                           AFTER



BAGHOUSE

{•

       Figure 2.  Smelter waste stream routings.
percent. The  ratio of flow rate to precipitator area was
decreased  about  40   percent,  and gas  temperature
decreased about 60 F  The general level of collection of
the individual elements increased appropriately except
for cadmium  and silver, which were improved, but not
to the levels of the other elements.
  A similar tabulation  of the before and after  data for
the gas stream from the reverberatory furnace, which
was segregated and routed through the other half of the
precipitator, is presented in Table 4. The ratio of flow
rate  to precipitator area was about the  same as the
original condition, and this  particular  gas  stream was
about  340 F hotter  than  the combined  streams.  A
decrease in collection  efficiency was observed for  total
p articulates and  for   most   of  the individual  trace
elements'. The numbers indicate some small increases in
collection efficiency for cadmium and antimony, but
these are small and difficult to rationalize in view of the
surrounding data.
  One  other  comparison of trace metal collection
behavior  is afforded from the analyses of the converter
dusts.  Here,  an electrostatic  precipitator  operating  at
800 F showed an overall collection efficiency  on  total
particulates of 26 percent. The collection efficiencies for
individual elements is  shown hi  Table  5.  In this  case,
gold,  silver,  and  copper show  collection efficiencies
above the average for total particulates, while the more
                       TABLE 3  EFFECT OF CONTROL PRACTICE CHANGES ON
                                 SMELTING EFFLUENTS (ROASTER GASES)
Collection efficiencies, %
Element
Cu
Zn
Cd
Pb
As
Sb
Au
Ag
Flow, scf/m
Temp., F
Dust burden,
tons/day, In
Out
Precipitator area
Overall efficiency on
particulates, %
Before
Combined flows
(dryer, roaster, reverb)
86
54
40
65
56
73
82
76
204,000
440
95
Ai
75
After
Roaster gases
99.2
98.4
82.0
96.2
98.5
99.2
98.3
81.4
600,505
380
95
0.62
Ai/2
98.9

-------
78
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
TABLE 4 EFFECT OF CONTROL PRACTICE
SMELTING
Element


Cu
Zn
Cd
Pb
As
Sb
Au
Ag
Flow, scf/m
Temp., F
Dust burden,
tons/day, In
Out
Precipitator area
Overall efficiency on
particulates,%


EFFLUENTS (REVERB
CHANGES ON
GASES)
Collection efficiences, %
Before
Combined flows
(dryer, roaster , reverb)
86
54
40
65
56
93
82
76
204,000
440

95
-
Ai

75


After
Reverb gases
75.4
29.0
44.8
48.7
50.0
99.1
57.2
35.4
97,000
780

48
18.3
Ai/2

62
(Exit gas to
baghouse)
 volatile trace metal elements show collection efficiencies
 in the range of 10 to 15 percent.
    TABLE 5  COLLECTION EFFICIENCIES ON
               CONVERTER GASES AND DUSTS
Element
Cu
Zn
Cd
Pb
As
Sb
Au
Ag
Gas flow, scf/m
Temp., F
Dust burden,
tons/day
Collection
efficiencies, %
85
15
16
13
11
10
94
55
100,000
800

23
        Overall efficiency on
          particulates, c/c
    26
(Exit gas to
 baghouse)
  The baghouses added to the plant collected dust with
metal contents as shown in Table 6. This dust is, of
course, the feed material for the zinc leaching operation,
with significant values of cadmium and lead.
  With  the  changes described,  the  plant  upgraded
precipitator collection performance from 75 percent to
98.9  percent  on  the roaster gases,  and went  from
precipitator performances of 75 percent and 26 percent
on  the  reverberatory furnace and converter gases to
baghouse  treatment  and associated  higher  collection
efficiencies.
TRACE METALS IN COPPER SMELTING
OPERATIONS
  As  analytical work proceeds,  some operations are
developing detailed knowledge of the behavior  of trace
metals in  their manufacturing processes. Two examples
of  the  behavior  of trace  metals  in  plant operations
follow.
  The factors in this example are indicated by the partial
flow diagram in Figure  3.  The operation is typical for
the copper  industry,  consisting  of ore  flotation
concentration,  reverberatory furnace  smelting,  and
converting. The control  device of interest is the cyclone
on  the converter. The reported efficiency of this cyclone
for collection of total particulates was 85 percent.
  The  available analytical  data on  trace metals in this
system  are shown in Table 7. Some of the trace metals
appear in significant  quantities only in the latter stages
of processing. In the ore, for example, arsenic is less than
1  ppm and selenium  is  reported as  50  ppm. The

-------
                                                              METALLURGICAL OPERATIONS
                                                                                     79
reverberatory  furnace  feed  is  the  product from the
flotation concentration process. Analysis of this material
shows  that trace  metals  are  concentrating  with the
copper, although zinc is the only metal concentrating at
a rate even approaching that of copper. The analyses of
interest are those of the dusts from the converter flue,
the converter  cyclone catch, and the dust issuing from
the converter  stack. Although the analyses do not allow
a rigorous determination of in-out control effectiveness
           ORE •
           1
	®
CONCENTRATOR



         NOTE:
         (A) INDICATES ANALYSES
 SLAG
          BLISTER        (A)-*-	CYCLONE
          COPPER               CATCH
   Figure 3.  Diagram relating analyses to process steps.

 for the cyclone, some observations may be made. The
 elements arsenic,  cadmium,  selenium,  zinc, and to a
 slight extent, chromium appear  in higher percentages in
 the stack dust than in the dust captured in the flue or
 cyclone.  Although   highly variable  in  occurrence,
 selenium appears to be concentrating in the system in
 terms of both the cyclone catch  and the stack loss.

 CLEANING SMELTER GASES  FOR ACID PLANTS
   The recent  attention  paid  to  mercury  has  drawn
 attention to the trace quantities of mercury found in
 some nonferrous metal ores. This trace mercury has been
 identified  principally in  zinc ores  where mercury
 contents of 20  to 200 ppm are reported. Three zinc
 smelters, two in the United States and one overseas, have
 been  known to  have  recovered this  trace metal  in  one
   TABLE 6  ANALYSES OF BAGHOUSE DUSTS
             (COMBINED REVERB AND
             CONVERTER DUSTS AFTER ELECTR
             ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR)
Element
Cu
Zn
Cd
Pb
Weight %
1.9
31
1.5
14
way or another. The occasional incidence of mercury in
roaster gases has been known for some years to designers
of sulfuric acid plants for operation on smelter gases.
Lead is a natural choice of materials of construction for
gas cleaning trains.  The presence of mercury in smelter
gases results in corrosive attack of the lead.
  Sulfuric acid plants  being operated at smelters have
established a  sequence  of gas cleaning steps which
remove trace metals and participates in order to achieve
protection of catalysts and saleable grades of acid purity.
Estimated upper limits for some trace metal and other
constituents in gas streams entering a catalytic  sulfuric
acid plant have been approximated in Table 8 (2).
  A typical gas cleaning train  for smelter gases  consists
of a waste heat boiler, a spray or tower scrubber using
weak (30  percent) acid,  and  always   one or more
electrostatic precipitators for removal of particulates and
demisting  (Figure  4).  A  recently  installed  overseas
facility, for the recovery  of  mercury  from zinc ore
roasting gases, had a similar gas cleaning train with the
addition  between  waste  heat boiler  and  weak acid
scrubber  of a  packed tower concentrated acid scrubber
(3).  In this scrubber, the mercury, and also the selenium,
in the gas stream were sulfatized and collected in the
acid. The  acids from  both scrubbers were treated  in
clarifiers  for solid-liquid separation, the liquids returned
to the roaster and  the solids routed to mercury  and
selenium recovery operations. Bleeds from the weak-acid
scrubber  liquor and  demisting precipitators  required
separate  treatment  by sodium sulfide  precipitation  to
produce  solids and  a purified  acid.  It should be noted
that this  system accounts for zinc and iron being present
but  makes no mention  of cadmium  or arsenic.  The
recovery  of mercury is indicated by the data in Table 9.
  One of the  most common  problems, identified in a
1971 survey of smelter waste  water problems,  was the
disposal  of the  dilute acid which accumulates in the
weak-acid scrubbers, spray  tower sumps, or precipitator
sumps. The liquor is too  dilute and too dirty to sell and
very difficult to treat. A  typical analysis of this liquor is
                                                                                   -TO MERCURY RECOVERY

                                                            Figure 4. Gas cleaning train for smelter gases.

-------
80
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
TABLE 7 TRACE METAL ANALYSES IN A COPPER

Reverb
Element Ore f H
I CCU
As <0.0001 0.001
Cd
Cu 0.9 27.4
Se 0.005 0.009
Zn 0.013 0.08
Cr
Mn
Ni 0.006 0.013
V
"Cyclone operates at 500 to 600 F.
TABLE 8 ESTIMATED UPPER LIMITES FOR
CONSTITUENTS IN GASES ENTERING
ACID PLANTS*
r, Approximate limit
Element . , . , , f.3
grains/standard ft
As(asAs203) 0.0005
Pb 0.0005
Hg 0.0001
Se 0.022
Cl 0.0005
F 0.0001

•Reference 2.


TABLE 9 DISTRIBUTION OF MERCURY IN ZINC
MDH7 Df\ A CTTXTf"1 /~\DT7O A TT/~\M *
UKb ROAMING OrLKAllON *
Converter
flue
dust
0.003
0.0001
25
0.0008
0.06
0.002
0.005
0.04
0.006

TABLE

SMELTING OPERATION
Converter Converter
cyclone cyclone
catch stack
0.008-0.010 0.003-0.02
0.002 0.001-0.085
36-72 2.5-15.0
0.02-0.32 <0.0001-2.3
0.06 0.04-4.4
0.001 0.003-0.008
0.004
0.036 0.02
0.005

10 COMPOSITIONS OF ACID PLANT
WATERS, mg/liter
Element , Plant A Plant B
(neutralized)
PH
As
Cd
Cu
Fe
Mn
Ni
Pb

Zn
S04
Se

5.0 1.9
22.1
7.7 0.60
0.06 7.43
7.4
0.7
0.2
0.5 7.23

8.0 7.3
960 1716
0.71

 In concentrate
 In roaster gas
 Gas after Hg removal
 Hg in H2 S04
 Hg recovery
      20-200 ppm
  0.0043-0.0348 grain/scf
0.000046-0.000092 grain/scf
      0.2-0.4 ppm
           99.5%
  •Reference 3.
 given in Table 10.  The Finnish system described above
 included  a  sodium  sulfide  precipitation  treatment  to
 clean up  the final bleed stream and by returning waste
 water and gases to the roaster achieved closed loops. No
 accounting was shown for such constituents as arsenic,
 cadmium, etc.
   Thus,  the  specific  solutions  to the  problems  of
 disposal of acid plant waters are currently being evolved
 by industry. It remains to be seen which of the possible
 alternatives  mentioned by industry in  the prior survey
prove to be  most feasible for the various plants. The
alternatives mentioned included: precipitation with S02,
neutralization,  evaporation,  deep  well injection, and
undesignated approaches to recovery.
  These  examples   have  shown  the  types  and
concentrations  of trace  metals encountered in waste
streams from copper  and  zinc smelting operations. The
first example showed that  improved control of emissions
of  both total  participates and trace  metals could be
achieved by  improved operating conditions (example,
lower gas flows and temperatures) in existing  devices and
the use of  additional control devices. All examples
showed that  in both waste gas streams and a selected
waste  water stream,  the  more  volatile  metals  (zinc,
cadmium, selenium,  mercury,  etc.) are the  ones most
likely  to  concentrate and are the most difficult to
control. Further,  the applied  or  planned methods of
control were individually suited to each smelter.

-------
                                                          METALLURGICAL OPERATIONS          81


REFERENCE                                        2. Duecher,  W. W., and  J.  B.  West,  (editors).  The
I.Robertson, D.J., FUtration of Copper Smelter Gases         Manufacture  of Sulfuric Acid,  Reinhold, New
    at  Hudson Bay  Mining and Smelting Company,         York, pp. 515, 1959.
    Limited, The  Canadian Mining and Metallurgical    3- Kangas, J., E. Myholm, and J. Rastas, Smelter Gases
    Bulletin, pp. 326-335, May 1960.                        Yield Mercury, Chemical Engineering, pp. 55-57,
                                                        September 6,  1971.

-------
               POLLUTION ABATEMENT ESf THE METAL
                                 FINISHING INDUSTRY
                                             J. CIANCIA
                                U.  S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                          Edison, New Jersey
INTRODUCTION
  Although there have been some significant advances in
metal finishing  waste treatment technology over the
years, the extent of the progress has not been sufficient
to meet the overall needs of the industry. Particularly
today, with public concern  and governmental pressure
focussed on toxic pollutants, such as the heavy metals,
chromate,  cyanide, and fluoride discharged  by metal
finishing facilities, new and improved waste  treatment
technology  is greatly needed by various segments of the
industry. Moreover, the problem will be compounded as
many municipal sewage  plants  accepting substantial
amounts of metal finishing wastes upgrade to secondary
treatment  under  governmental  schedules,  and  the
disposal of metal hydroxide sludges generated in the
conventional treatment approach becomes more difficult
as enforcement agencies intensify solid waste control.
  The metal finishing industry in the United States is
comprised  of an estimated  20,000 facilities, including
both job shops and captive installations associated with
the automotive,  aircraft, electronic, appliance, jewelry
and other industries.
  The primary environmental concern of the industry is
water pollution.  Waterborne wastes produced in metal
finishing operations contain toxic pollutants, corrosive
substances,  oil,  grease, surface  active  agents,  organic
solvents, nutrients, and settleable solids.

Metal Finishing Processes
  The processing carried out in the industry may be
classified as (a) cleaning for the removal of surface oils,
grease, dirt, buffing  compounds,  etc.  (b)  removing
undesirable  surfaces such as oxides, rust,  and scale by
pickling; defective  metal surfaces  by  stripping;  and
portions  of  metal  surfaces  by  etching,  and  (c)
electrochemical  and  chemical  processing  for  surface
coating a basis metal.
  Metal  surface  preparation   and  cleaning  are
accomplished by (a) mechanical  finishing  activities, (b)
organic solvents and alkaline cleaning solutions, and (c)
pickling  solutions.  Mechanical  operations  such  as
tumbling,  blast cleaning, polishing, or buffing produce
solid impurities.  Organic solvents and alkaline cleaning
solutions are used to remove solid particles such as oil,
grease, and dirt from workpieces.
  Pickling is used extensively for the  removal of scale,
corrosion, and other  undesirable  surface  conditions.
Most pickling operations simply involve solution of the
scale in acids such as sulfuric, hydrochloric, phosphoric,
nitric, and hydrofluoric.  Acid pickling on a large scale
occurs in the steel industry, but considerable quantities
of acids are  also  used in metal finishing facilities.  Some
pickling is also carried out with alkaline solutions.
  Electroplating  solutions are basically  either  acid  or
alkaline  baths. Acid plating solutions  contain free acid
and heavy metals, usually chromium, nickel, copper, or
zinc. Alkaline  plating  baths are  mainly in the form of
complex cyanide solutions. Some of the more significant
cyanide plating solutions are copper, zinc, and cadmium.
  Other important  metal finishing  operations  include
chromate  conversion  coating  processes,  anodizing,
phosphate coating processes, stripping, etching, bright
dipping,  electro  and   chemical polishing,  plating  on
plastics, and the  application of  organic  coatings on
metals.
Sources of Waste
  In  carrying out  metal  finishing operations,  the
workpieces are immersed in the bath and then lifted out,
resulting  in  some loss  of solution from the bath. The
parts are either suspended from a moveable rack or are
placed within a perforated barrel, depending on the size
and shape of the pieces. Transfer of the parts from tank
to tank may  be done manually  or automatically by
conveyor.  In performing the processing, the workpieces
must  be  properly cleaned  and  conditioned before
entering  the metal finishing baths.  Water  rinses  are
employed  after each treatment  to prevent  carryover of

-------
84
             CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
process solution, referred to as "dragout," into the next
metal finishing operation.
  The  wastes produced in metal finishing facilities come
mainly from the following sources:
1. The dumping of spent baths used for carrying out the
   various processing operations.
2. The rinse  waters used  to wash off process solution
   that has adhered to the surface or was entrapped in
   crevices due to the shape of the part.
3. Accidental  waste  discharges  which  can  occur  in
   practically every  metal  finishing  operation in  the
   plant.  These  wastes are  usually  significant where
   relatively little engineering effort has been directed
   toward preventing accidents.
Other  sources  of  waste include plant and equipment
cleanup, entrainment of  mists  in  exhaust ventilation
ducts,  regenerants from ion exchange units, and sludges
resulting  from  deposits   in  process  tanks  and  the
precipitation of contaminants from wastes.
IN-PLANT WASTE CONTROL
  The  methods available for the abatement of pollution
may be divided into two general categories: (a) In-plant
control techniques for conserving water and eliminating
all  unnecessary wastes,  and (b) the installation  of
treatment and recovery processes to destroy  or remove
toxic and  objectionable materials in the effluent.
  Before  considering  treatment  or recovery, the waste
problem  should  be  completely  defined  and, where
feasible, reduced  to the maximum extent possible  by
in-plant control techniques. In approaching the problem,
a prime goal  is  to prevent the loss of chemicals into the
wastewater. This will result in both  a  savings in  the
chemicals lost,  plus the cost to treat  these materials in
the  wastewater. Another  major objective of in-plant
control is to conserve water and reduce the  volume of
the waste, thereby decreasing intake water requirements
as well as the size of the waste treatment equipment. In
recent  years, water conservation has been recognized to
be a significant cost factor because of rising water costs,
water scarcity in certain areas, and the increased cost of
sewer rental charges.
  In addition, process changes can sometimes be made
to  reduce  or  eliminate   pollution  without  affecting
performance  or  product quality. Some  of the process
changes made  in  metal finishing facilities to achieve
pollution  abatement  are (a)  the   use  of  low  or
noncyanide  plating solutions  in  place of high cyanide
baths,  (b) the  replacement  of phosphate in  cleaning
solutions, and  (c)  the   substitution  of  mechanical
cleaning for chemical treatments  such as pickling.
  An integral part  of all industrial waste  surveys that
should  not be overlooked  is a complete reappraisal of
the metal finishing  operations carried  out at the plant.
This would  involve an evaluation  of the technical and
economic  features  of both  the processing and  waste
disposal aspects of the problem.
  A breakdown of the various in-plant control methods
for reducing contaminant loads and/or waste volume are
shown  in  Tables  1  to  4.  Basically, the reduction  of
dragout  reduces the waste load; effective rinsing and
water  reuse practices conserve  water and  reduce  the
waste  volume; and the  prevention of spills, leaks, and
other losses reduce the waste load and/or volume.

       TABLE 1  REDUCTION OF DRAGOUT

Use  of smooth, properly insulated racks designed with
shapes for minimum carryover of process solutions.
Maintenance of racks to keep them  in good condition,
free  of incidental metal build-up and corrosion.
Proper racking of parts for fast draining.
Scheduling  sufficient time  above the process tank for
good draining.
Use  of splash guards and  drip boards for draining the
solution back into the process  tank.
Reduction  of dragout by air  blowoff, or movement of
parts or tumbling of barrels above the process tank.
Use  of wetting  agents to permit increased drainage of
process solution back into the  bath.

          TABLE 2  EFFECTIVE RINSING

Proper  design  of  rinse tanks  to  provide adequate
turbulence  and prevent short circuiting of the water.
Use  of air agitation in rinse tanks and/or agitation of the
parts.
Use  of nonrunning reclaim rinses as the first  step to
washing off dragout from parts.
Use of spray or fog rinses.
Use of multiple countercurrent rinsing.
Control of rinsing  either manually or automatically by
conductivity or  flow of work  (running rinse waters
should be shut off when parts are not moving through
the processing line).

WASTE TREATMENT
  A  variety of techniques are available for treating metal
finishing   wastewaters  but  the generally accepted
procedure involves (a) separation of grease and oil, (b)
oxidative  destruction of  cyanides,   (c) reduction  of
chromates,  (d)  neutralization,  (e)   separation  of the
precipitated  metal hydroxides, and  (f)  disposal of the
sludge.
  Other  techniques  that have achieved  significant
application  for treating  metal finishing wastewaters are
(a) ion exchange to accomplish purification and re-use of
strong baths and rinse waters, (b) the use of evaporation
either  alone or  in combination  with ion exchange to
recover chemicals and purify rinse waters, and (c) the

-------
                                                                 METAL FINISHING INDUSTRY
                                                  85
  TABLE 3  PREVENTION OF ACCIDENTAL AND
	OTHER LOSSES	

Routine inspections to locate leaks.
Arrangement of all equipment and piping so it is in plain
view and easily accessible.
Installation of float  valves or alarm systems  to prevent
overflow.
Installation of  walls or  curbs  around metal finishing
baths to retain accidental losses or leaks from the tanks
within enclosed areas.
Eliminating temporary connections in order  to prevent
accidental spills and discharging wastes into  the  wrong
sewer.
Use of storage tanks, sumps, or pits located so as to save
concentrated baths in case of leaks.
Use of above  level  filling  lines  in  process tanks  so
operator can tell whether supply is on or off.
Education of personnel on good housekeeping practices,
particularly in cleanup where every attempt should be
made to minimize water use and salvage materials.

	TABLE 4  RE-USE OF WATER	

Use of rinse  water  effluents from some  operations in
others with lower rinse water quality requirements.
Use of steam condensate from  heating operations as a
source  of pure  water for solution make-up and rinsing.
Use of recirculating cooling  water systems or re-use of
the cooling water for  rinsing in certain metal finishing
operations.
Recirculation of washer waters from scrubbers.
Use of high  quality  water produced by  many  of  the
waste  treatment methods  for  rinsing  and/or bath
make-up.

"integrated"  or  chemical  rinse  system  for  treating
dragout prior to water rinsing. In addition, there are also
a  large  number  of  metal  finishing waste  treatment
techniques  that have had  only  a somewhat limited
application or are in various stages of  development or
demonstration.
  A  significant  and  troublesome problem in  metal
finishing  wastewater treatment  is sludge  disposal. The
metal  hydroxides precipitated  and  settled from  the
wastewater are gelatinous and very difficult to dewater.
The  sludge  also  contains calcium  carbonate and
magnesium hydroxide  formed from the hardness  in the
water supply, and the dirt that was on the parts or which
resulted from the processing operations. Techniques
available for concentrating or preparing these sludges  for
final  disposal  are  thickening,  vacuum  or pressure
filtration,  sludge beds, centrifugation,  and  drying  or
incineration.
 TABLE 5  METAL FINISHING WASTE TREATMENT
 	TECHNOLOGY	

 Conventional
  Alkaline chlorination of cyanide
  Chemical   reduction  of hexavalent  chromium  to
  trivalent form
  Precipitation  of metals as hydroxides
 Ion exchange
 Evaporation
 Integrated chemical rinsing
 Precipitation of hexavalent  chromium
 Electrolytic
 Carbon adsorption
 Carbon bed catalytic destruction of cyanide
 Reverse osmosis
 Electrodialysis
 Ion flotation
 Kastone   process  (hydrogen  peroxide/formaldehyde
 oxidation of cyanide)
 Ozone destruction of cyanide
 Waste plus waste
 Freezing processes
 Sulfide precipitation of metals
 Reduction  of  chromium  by  scrap iron (simultaneous
 cementation of copper may also be feasible)

  Air pollution problems in the metal finishing industry
 result from (a)  exhausting toxic and corrosive fumes and
 mists from  processing  baths, (b) solid  particles from
 mechanical surface preparation activities, and (c) solvent
 vapors from cleaners and painting operations. Washers,
 packed tower  scrubbers,  cloth filters,  cyclones, and
 solvent incinerators are  used  to  prevent  these
 contaminants from polluting the atmosphere.
  The  technology for   treating  metal  finishing
 wastewaters presently in use or under development and
 demonstration is outlined in Table 5.
 Conventional Treatment
  Chemical destruction  by  alkaline  chlorination is the
 commonly  used  method  for  removing  cyanide from
 wastewater. The cyanide can be  oxidized to the cyanate
 or further to nitrogen gas and carbon dioxide, depending
 on  the requirements  for discharge.  Since  cyanate
 reportedly  is only about  one-thousandth as toxic  as
 cyanide, treatment  to  cyanate  may be acceptable  to
regulatory agencies in some  cases.
  The  alkaline  chlorination  process may be  carried out
either by adding chlorine gas and an alkaline compound
to the wastewater, or by the use of hypochlorites such as
sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), calcium  hypochlorite

-------
86
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
(Ca(OCl)2) or bleaching powder (CaOCl2)-
  Alkaline  chlorination of  cyanide  to form  cyanates
actually  occurs  in two stages.  The  first reaction is
between  chlorine and cyanide  to  form  cyanogen
chloride; this reaction is virtually instantaneous at all pH
values. The second reaction involves the hydrolysis of
cyanogen chloride  to the cyanate. The rate of hydrolysis
depends primarily on the pH and is relatively rapid at pH
values above  10. At lower pH values, however, sufficient
chlorine must be added to ensure an excess beyond that
needed  to  oxidize the  cyanide to cyanate so that  the
liberation of noxious cyanogen chloride  is avoided.
  The further oxidation of cyanate to  nitrogen gas and
carbon dioxide is slow and takes several  hours or more at
a pH over  10; however, this can be  accomplished in a
relatively short time at a pH below 9.
  Wastes also contain heavy metal cyanide complexes in
addition  to  the  sodium cyanide. The   alkaline
chlorination  process is  effective in treating all of the
common metal  finishing cyanide  complexes with  the
exception  of nickelocyanides and  ferrocyanides.  If
sufficient reaction time and excess chlorine are provided,
even the nickelocyanides  can be satisfactorily broken
down. Since nickel plating is not carried out in  cyanide
solutions, the nickelocyanide complexes may be avoided
by keeping these discharges out of the cyanide drains.
  A one- or  two-step process may be  used to achieve
complete destruction  of the cyanide in metal finishing
wastes. A single stage oxidation  can  be carried out by
maintaining the pH between 8.5  and  9. Excess chlorine
is needed to  avoid the liberation of cyanogen chloride.
The two-step process  consists  of first  oxidizing  the
cyanide to  cyanate at a pH above 10, and then reducing
the pH to a value between 7.0 and 8 for the second stage
oxidation.
  The   commonly  used   method  for  treating
chromium-bearing  wastes involves reducing hexavalent
chromium to the trivalent  form, which  is then amenable
to precipitation as the hydroxide. Normally, the pH of
the waste chromium solution must be lowered since the
optimum  pH value  for carrying out the reduction is
between  2 and  3. Sulfuric  acid is  generally used  to
reduce the pH of  the waste. The reducing agents most
frequently  used are sulfur dioxide, sodium bisulfite  or
metabisulfite.and ferrous sulfate.
  After   reducing  the  chromium and oxidizing  the
cyanide,  all of the metal finishing wastes are usually
combined and treated to precipitate  the various heavy
metals by  adjusting  the  pH of the  mixed effluent
to a value between 8 and 8.5.
  A batchwise  or  continuous  operation   may   be
employed  for  alkaline   chlorination or  chromium
reduction.  Batch systems are mainly  suited for  treating
wastes from  small and medium  size  metal  finishing
plants.  The recommended  practice  for  batchwise
treatment is to have duplicate  tankage.  With two tanks,
the  wastes are  collected   in  one while  treatment is
 provided in  the other.  Continuous treatment is more
 practical for plants  handling  large volumes  of  wastes
 containing  relatively  low concentrations  of
 contaminants.  With continuous  treatment, the size of
 the tankage is substantially reduced compared with that
 needed for batch operation, but provision must be made
 for handling process solutions  that are discharged at
 intervals. Continuous treatment requires  the  use of
 automatic  oxidation-reduction  potential and pH
 controllers, both of which are also utilized in some cases
 for batch treatment.
 Ion Exchange
   Using ion  exchange waste  treatment systems  in the
 metal finishing  field  is an accepted practice for certain
 types of effluents. Ion exchange is also  used to a limited
 extent to treat a variety of other metal finishing wastes.
   There are  two basic applications of ion exchange for
 treating metal finishing wastes.
 1. To purify  the solutionfor re-use, remove heavy  metal
   contamination from  spent  processing  baths  and
   reclaim or still rinses.
 2. Demineralize individual or  mixed flowing rinses and
   concentrate  the dragout for  chemical treatment or
   recovery to obtain a high quality water for re-use.
   Ion exchange is  widely used in  the treatment  of
 chromic acid process baths and  rinses, and  mixed rinse
 waters. A large number of commercial installations use
 this process.
   Chromic acid plating, copper stripping, and aluminum
 anodizing operations  are  all   adversely affected  by a
 buildup of metallic contaminants in the processing bath.
 When the metallic impurities  reach  a  certain level, it
 becomes necessary to replace either a portion or the
 entire bath with chromic acid. The problem  of disposing
 of these baths may be overcome by passing  the solution
 through  a   cation exchange  unit  operating on the
 hydrogen cycle  as illustrated in Figure 1.  The  metal
 cations are removed  from the bath and exchanged for
 hydrogen  ions,  thus  reforming  the  chromic  acid.
 Although  chromic  acid  anodizing  solutions can be
                                         RAW WATER
                                    TO WASTE
Figure 1. Cation exchange unit for chromic acid recovery.

-------
                                                                  METAL FINISHING INDUSTRY
                                                   87
treated directly,  chromic  acid  plating  and  copper
stripping solutions  must  be diluted  and subsequently
concentrated after  ion exchange  treatment.  The high
chromic  acid  concentration in  these  baths  prevents
effective  removal of the metallic impurities and causes
oxidative degradation  of  the  resin.  Highly crosslinked
and  macroreticular  resins are  used to  treat  chromic
acid solutions due to their ability to withstand oxidizing
conditions.
  Ion  exchange  is  also  applied  commercially  to
reconstitute other  processing baths  including  sodium
dichromate  passivating or  chromatizing  solutions,
phosphoric acid solutions used to  pickle steel or bright
finish aluminum, and acetic acid solutions used to pickle
magnesium.
  Metal  finishing   rinse  waters are  treated  by  ion
exchange for (a) pollution control, (b) water re-use, and
(c)  chemical recovery  or concentration.  A  hydrogen
cation  and  hydroxyl anion exchange column are used to
demineralize the rinse  water. Where it is  feasible to
segregate the chromic acid, cyanide, and other rinses,
metal may be recovered by treating the individual rinse
waters. For example, when  treating chromic acid rinse
waters, the sodium  chromate regenerant from the anion
exchanger  can  be passed  through  the hydrogen cation
exchanger to reform chromic acid. When treating nickel
plating  rinse  waters, the  sulfuric  acid  regenerant
discharged  from the  cation exchanger  is a  relatively
concentrated nickel  sulfate  solution.  When  treating
mixed  rinse waters, the contaminants are concentrated
to very small volumes in the regenerant solutions, which
are then easily  and effectively treated by conventional
chemical practice.
  When  treating   mixed  rinse  waters,  cyanide
contaminants pose  some problems and require special
consideration. Most  serious is the poisoning of the anion
resin  by  the  adsorption  of  tightly  held  cyanide
complexes  that are  difficult  to regenerate  off  the
exchanger bed.  Conventional  demineralization  has
shown little or no poisoning effects if the cyanide level is
low. Poisoning of the anion resin will occur  when the
cyanide exceeds  a  certain  level,  depending  on  the
contaminants  present.  A  two-stage  regeneration
procedure and a three-bed system consisting of a strong
acidic, weakly basic, and strongly basic exchanger permit
effective treatment of cyanide rinse waters.
  The use  of ion exchange  is a common  practice for
recovering  the  precious  metals  from  rinse   waters.
Although the  tightly  held  anionic  metal  complexes
cannot  be eluted from the exchanger, the high price of
gold,  platinum,  and  other  precious  metals  makes
incineration of the resin a  practical recovery technique.

Evaporation
  Evaporative recovery  of processing  chemicals from
rinse waters has become an  established method  for
controlling  pollution in the  metal finishing industry.
 This  approach, however,  has  found  only limited
 application.  To be economical, it is generally necessary
 to  apply evaporation to relatively  concentrated rinses,
 such as those produced in still or reclaim tanks and those
 from countercurrent rinsing. The technique is attractive
 in operations where the  amount of dragout is large and
 waste  flows  are small. Another important factor is the
 cost of the  processing chemicals  to  be recovered. The
 evaporative technique requires segregation of the wastes
 by compatible types and the use of various means for
 excluding or removing impurities.
  Evaporative  recovery  concentrates  the  chemical
 dragout in the rinse water to bath strength and returns
 this concentrated solution to the process  tanks. The
 evaporated water is re-used in the rinse system, thereby
 evaporated water is reused in the rinse system, thereby
 providing a high quality water for rinsing and  minimizing
 the water intake to the facility.
  In metal finishing  systems,  dragout  naturally  purges
 baths of any contaminants resulting from the processing
 operation. Buildup of impurities in evaporative recovery
 operations may be prevented by the incorporation of
 techniques  such as  ion exchange, precipitation, and
 activated carbon treatment.
  In closed-loop operation  (Figure  2),  the system is
 designed  to  recover  100  percent  of  the  processing
 chemicals lost  in the dragout for re-use in the metal
 finishing  operation. No  external  rinse water is  added
 except   that  required  to  replace  the  loss  from
 atmospheric evaporation. The only chemicals  supplied to
 the  metal finishing  bath are those needed  to replace
 what is actually deposited on parts and to replace that
 lost  by  spillage   or  accidentally.  Although  total
 closed-loop control represents an idealized system, it has
 been closely approximated in many installations.
      PLATING TANK
                                RINSE TANKS
Figure 2.  Closed-loop evaporative recovery system.

  Often,  the  favorable  economics  of  closed-loop
evaporative recovery does not apply because a processing
line has an insufficient number of countercurrent rinse
tanks. Generally, at least three rinse tanks are needed to
make evaporative recovery  of dragout  effective  and
economical. The number  of rinse tanks determines  the

-------
88
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
amount of steam required for evaporation, which is the
largest cost for recovery.
  When a layout of a metal finishing facility does not
meet  the conditions for a closed evaporator loop,  a
partial  recovery  system referred  to  as   open-loop
evaporation may still be attractive. In this operation, the
water from the first rinse tank  following  the  metal
finishing bath is circulated through the evaporator. The
concentrated solution is returned to the processing tank
and the evaporated water is re-used in rinsing. A second
rinse tank is  furnished with a separate supply of water
which, after  rinsing, is  discharged to waste.  This rinse
water effluent contains only a very small portion of the
"dragout" because the bulk of the solution carried out
of the bath enters  the first rinse tank and is recovered in
the evaporative  system.  The small fraction of dragout
solution entering the second rinse tank can be treated by
some  method other  than evaporation before  sending it
to the sewer.
Integrated Treatment
  The  integrated  system  has  gained considerable
acceptance in the  United States in recent years and is
now an established method for treating process solutions
dragged out  of metal finishing baths. The basic concept
is segregation and treatment of the waste at the source.
Treatment  is  accomplished by  integrating a  chemical
washing  operation  as  the first  step  in  the rinsing
sequence.  Chemical  washing  involves  simultaneous
removal and treatment of the film of processing solution
adhering to  the parts removed from the metal finishing
bath.
  The integrated system incorporates a  chemical wash
tank  immediately  following  the  metal  finishing
operation before  the  part enters the  water rinsing
sequence. In some  cases, the chemical washing operation
may follow  a  reclaim  still rinse  tank.  The  chemical
solution is continuously  recirculated through the wash
tank and a larger reservoir tank as shown in Figure 3. In
the wash tank, the treatment solution both  physically
removes  the  dragout and at the same  time  chemically
reacts with the  contaminants.  The reservoir tank is  a
buffering  component  in the system  for  neutralizing
shock loadings caused by sudden and irregular  changes in
the quantity  of process solution dragged into the wash
tank.  It  also serves  as  a clarifier for  settling  out  the
insoluble metal oxide and hydroxides formed in the first
stage  of the reaction, as well as a  retention  tank to
provide  adequate time for  the  desired  chemical
reactions, such  as  the  oxidation of cyanides or  the
reduction of chromates. Several  wash  tanks  treating
similar types of dragout  solution can be served by a
common reservoir tank.  As an  example,  the  same
chemical wash may be used after various cyanide plating
or processing operations or after  chromate conversion
coating operations involving different  basic metals.
  Since  the  chemical  rinse  solution  is continuously
recirculated and not wasted in the integrated system, a
much  higher  concentration of  chemicals  can be used
than is needed to react with the dragout during the time
the workpieces are washed in the treatment solution.
V
PL/I

VUKf, 1 Kt
\ VCL
iTING TANK

i
p
i
T
"] L
	
REATMENT
w
w*
AlbK
L
T
—
kTER RINSE
WASH ,
(7)PUMP
! SEV

YER
              PUMP
CHLORINATOR
      OR
HYPOCHLORITE
    FEEDER
                                       PUMP
                    SETTLING TANK
                    AND RESERVOIR
                                           CAUSTIC
                                           SOLUTION
    Figure 3. Integrated waste treatment system for
             cyanide plating effluents.

  The integrated system produces relatively high density
sludges compared with conventional chemical treatment.
In addition, a substantial portion of the freshwater rinse
may be  re-used  since there  is no  direct addition  of
treatment  chemicals and  the  carryover  from  the
chemical wash tank is relatively dilute and nontoxic.
  Over  a period  of time,  harmless  waste treatment
reaction  products, such  as sodium chloride, sodium
carbonate,  and sodium sulfate, slowly build up in the
chemical wash  solution. No  problems  are  normally
encountered,  however,  because  solution  is  dumped
infrequently and does not contain any toxic materials.
Precipitation of Hexavalent Chromium
  Hexavalent  chromium  also may be directly removed
from metal finishing wastewaters by precipitation as an
insoluble salt  of chromic acid. The treatment method
generally involves the use of barium compounds for the
precipitation of insoluble barium chromate.
  Rigid chemical control is necessary in carrying out the
operation to ensure the addition of the correct amount
of barium chloride or other compound because of the
generally toxic nature of barium salts. In  addition, the
sludges  produced  in the process are  toxic and  may
present  some  disposal problems. Direct precipitation of
chromium  has  only been  applied  to a  very limited
extent.
Electrolytic Treatment
  For strong  baths, the  electrolytic decomposition of
cyanide solutions is economically feasible. Spent plating
solutions, strip  baths, and  cyanide dips fall into this
category.  The  technique  is  useful  for reducing
concentrated  solutions to a point where a secondary

-------
                                                                 METAL FINISHING INDUSTRY
                                                 89
treatment  may  be employed to remove  the remaining
cyanide satisfactorily.
  Electrochemical  treatment of  metal  finishing rinse
wastes  has  not been  practical  because of the  low
conductivity  of  these  effluents.  However,  a  new
electrolytic processing  technique has been introduced
that  uses  a  bed  of  carbon  particles  between the
electrodes  to overcome the high resistance of the rinse
waters. The system is designed to treat either cyanide or
chromate rinse waters.
  The individual particles that make up the bed are said
to exhibit bipolar  properties under an applied D.C.
current. Each particle  has  an anode portion at which
oxidation  can  occur and a  cathode portion at which
reduction can take place.
  In treating  cyanide  rinse  waters,  the cyanide  is
oxidized to nitrogen and carbon dioxide, and the metal
ions  are both electro-deposited at the cathode sites and
precipitated  as  the oxide  or hydroxide  at the anode
sites. In some cases, caustic may have to be added to the
effluent for complete precipitation of the heavy metals.
The treatment of chromium-bearing rinse waters  involves
a reduction of the hexavalent chromium to the trivalent
form at the cathode sites but no precipitation will occur
in the  beds because of the  low pH of the waste. The
trivalent  chromium  and  other heavy  metals are
subsequently precipitated by the addition  of alkali.
  A number of plants are employing the new electrolytic
approach to treat cyanide and chromium-bearing metal
finishing rinse waters.
Carbon Adsorption
  A  recently completed laboratory and pilot plant study
has resulted hi  the development of an activated carbon
adsorption process for treating chrome or cyanide rinse
waters  from  metal  finishing  shops.   Although the
technical feasibility of the process has been established,
further study and refinement of the stripping operations
are needed  as  the carbon  bed experienced  a loss of
chromate  capacity and  required  successively longer
periods for eluting the cyanide over a somewhat limited
number of treatment cycles.
Carbon Bed Catalytic Destruction of Cyanide
  A  new  system that uses  a granular activated carbon
bed to catalytically destroy cyanide has recently moved
out  of the development and demonstration stage into
commercial  application.  The process  is designed to
continuously oxidize cyanide to carbonates and nitrogen
compounds by  adding a copper catalyst  and air to the
raw  waste and  then passing the solution through the
carbon column.  The  presence of copper  ions results in
the formation  of  copper  cyanide complexes  that are
adsorbed  to  a  much  greater  extent   than  cyanide,
permitting higher flow rates through the column. The
copper also  aids in cyanide  oxidation and accelerates
cyanate  hydrolysis to end products that  combine with
the cupric  ion to form precipitates of copper carbonate
and copper hydroxide - amine compounds that remain
in the carbon  bed. After some period of  time,  the
carbon  bed  either must  be  replaced or  the copper
precipitates removed by dissolution with acid.
Membrane Processes
  The  use of  reverse osmosis and  electrodialysis  as
methods for treating metal finishing rinse waters is in the
development,demonstration, and early application stage.
These membrane techniques accomplish pollution abate-
ment by (a) purifying the  rinse water for re-use, and (b)
concentrating the chemicals for return to the bath or for
convenient subsequent treatment or disposal.
  Electrodialysis involves the transport of ionic species
through membranes by the application of a D.C. current.
Compartments forme'd by  a cation and anion membrane
are arranged in a stack configuration between electrodes.
As  the  rinse  water   flows through  every  other
compartment, the cation  exchange membrane permits
the passage of cations and rejects anions, while the anion
membrane  allows the passage  of anions  and rejects
cations, thus purifying the rinse water  while forming a
concentrate in the adjacent compartments.
  In reverse osmosis, pressure is used to force pure water
through the membrane while the chemicals are rejected
and  concentrate  in the  rinsewater.  Reverse osmosis
equipment  is  available   in  plate-and-frame,  tubular,
spiral-wound, and hollow fiber types.
  Along with the application of membrane systems, an
important part of the investigations underway involves a
continuing search for  the  most appropriate membranes
to  treat  the  various  types  of  rinsewaters.  The
development  of membranes with improved properties
will  have an important  bearing on the success  and
acceptance that  reverse  osmosis and electrodialysis
receive in the metal finishing industry.
Ion Flotation
  The  use of ion flotation for treating metal  finishing
rinse  waters  is in  the early  development stage.  The
technique involves the use of  organic collectors having
surface active properties and  an inorganic group  that
ionizes in  aqueous solutions. The contaminant ions such
as chromate or  complex cyanides are removed from the
solution by the collector that attaches to small rising air
bubbles that form a froth at the surface.

Hydrogen  Peroxide/Formaldehyde  Destruction  of
Cyanide
  A new process  referred  to  as  "Kastone" uses a
proprietary peroxygen compound in  the  presence of
formaldehyde  to oxidize   cyanide  to  cyanate  in
rinsewaters  from  zinc  or  cadmium  metal  finishing
operations. During the treatment, which is designed for
batchwise  operation, the zinc,  and/or cadmium, or both
precipitate and are easily removed  by filtration.  The
major components in the rinse water after treatment are
the cyanate ion, ammonia, and glycolic acid amide. This

-------
90
CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
approach  has been  finding  some  acceptance  by  the
industry,  particularly  in  small  metal finishing shops
discharging to municipal sewers.

Ozone Destruction of Cyanide
  Ozone is a  suitable oxidant for cyanide, with the final
reaction  product  being substantially cyanate.  The
oxidation  of  cyanide to cyanate by ozone is rapid and
practically instantaneous in  the presence of a trace  of
copper, but oxidation  of the cyanate  is relatively slow.
  Ozone   is  generated  in commercially available
equipment and  must  be  introduced  in  a  manner  to
ensure intimate contact with the entire waste solution.
This may be done in  tray  or packed columns or by
dispersion of the ozonized air through diffuser plates at
the bottom of the chamber.
  This treatment method has found application in a few
plants  and has  the   advantage  of  not  adding  any
constituents to the water. The cost  of producing ozone
is  a major factor in  the economic feasibility of the
process, which  has become  more attractive  in the last
few years  because of  the reduced  cost for generating
ozone.

Waste Plus Waste
  A new  approach to  removing cyanides and metals
from metal finishing wastes has recently been developed
in bench scale studies conducted at  the U. S. Bureau of
Mines  in  Rolla, Missouri. The method simply involves
slowly blending the acid wastes from the facility into the
alkaline cyanide wastes in a well-mixed closed reactor.
At  a pH value  near 7,  the heavy metals and cyanide in
the blended waste precipitate and are easily filtered from
the  solution. The applicability of the technique will
depend largely  on the  relative amounts of cyanide and
acid wastes  produced  at  the plant  as  well  as the
particular   heavy   metals  present.   Heating  the metal
cyanide precipitates in  the presence  of air results in the
formation of relatively stable metal oxides.

Freezing
  Development work on two types of freezing processes
for recovering chemicals while simultaneously purifying
metal finishing  rinse waters for reuse has recently been
reported.  In  one case, bench scale investigations have
been  conducted on a  freeze drying process in which
frozen  waste droplets are   formed  in  a  refrigerant
solution followed by sublimation of the water from the
crystals in a  vacuum chamber. In the  other,  pilot  plant
investigations have been carried  out on  a  process  in
which cooled metal finishing wastes are frozen in direct
contact with an immiscible fluorocarbon refrigerant. The
ice  crystals, which are  virtually pure water, are  cleaned
to  remove chemicals  adhering to  their  surface  in a
unique countercurrent washer. The concentration can be
carried  to the  point  of saturation  where  the  salts
precipitate out of solution.
                                            BIBLIOGRAPHY
                                             1. A State-of-the-Art Review of Metal Finishing Waste
                                                   Treatment,  Federal  Water  Quality
                                                   Administration — U. S. Dept.  of the Interior,
                                                   Water  Pollution  Control  Research  Series,
                                                   1201OE1E, November 1968.
                                             2. American Electroplaters' Society, A Report  on the
                                                   Control of Cyanides in Plating  Shop Effluents,
                                                   Plating, Vol. 56, pp.  1107-1112,1969.
                                             3. An Investigation  of  Techniques  for Removal of
                                                   Chromium From  Electroplating Wastes,  U. S.
                                                   Environmental  Protection  Agency,   Water
                                                   Pollution  Control Research  Series,  12010E1E,
                                                   March 1971.
                                             4. An Investigation  of  Techniques  for Removal of
                                                   Cyanide From  Electroplating  Wastes,  U. S.
                                                   Environmental  Protection  Agency,  Water
                                                   Pollution  Control Research  Series,  12010E1E,
                                                   November  1971.
                                             5. Campbell, R. J. and D. K. Emmerman, Freezing and
                                                   Recycling of Plating Rinsewater, Industrial Water
                                                   Engineering, pp. 38-39, June/July 1972.
                                             6. Culotta, J. M., Treatment of Cyanide and Chromic
                                                   Acid Plating Wastes, Plating, Vol. 52, No. 6, pp.
                                                   545-548,1965.
                                             7. Day,  R.  V.,  Disposal  of  Plating  Room Wastes,
                                                   Plating, Vol. 46, pp. 929-931, 1959.
                                             S.Easton,  J.   K.,  Electrolytic  Decomposition  of
                                                   Concentrated  Cyanide Plating Wastes, Plating,
                                                   Vol. 53,1340-1342, 1966.
                                             9. Kunin,  R., Ion  Exchange  for the  Metal Products
                                                   Finisher, Products Finishing, April 1969.
                                            10. Kushner,  J.  B.,  Rinsing,  Pollution  and Natural
                                                   Recycling of Plating Baths, Metal Finishing, pp.
                                                   36-39, July 1971, pp. 54-58, August 1971.
                                            11. Lancy, L. E., An Economic Study of Metal Finishing
                                                   Waste Treatment, Plating, Vol. 54, pp. 157-161,
                                                   February 1967.
                                            12. Lancy,  L.  E.,   Pollution  Control  in  Plating
                                                   Operations, Chapter 12,  Industrial  Pollution
                                                   Control Handbook, Edited by Herbert F. Lund,
                                                   McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1971.
                                            13. Scrota,  L., Treatment  of Chromate Wastes, Metal
                                                   Finishing, Vol. 55, pp. 65-67, September 1957.
                                            14. Spatz, D.  D., Electroplating Waste Water Processing
                                                   With Reverse  Osmosis,  Products Finishing, pp.
                                                   79-89, August 1972.
                                            IS.Sondak, N. E. and B. F. Dodge,  The  Oxidation of
                                                   Cyanide-Bearing Plating Wastes  by  Ozone,
                                                   Rating, Part I,  pp.  173-180, February  1961,
                                                   Part II, pp. 280-284, March 1961.
                                            16. Yuronis, D.,  Metal  Finishing   Waste  Treatment:
                                                   Comparative  Economics,  Plating,  Vol. 55, pp.
                                                   1171-1174,1968.
                                            17. Zievers, J. F., R. W. Grain, and F. G. Barclay, Waste
                                                   Treatment  in  Metal  Finishing:  U. S.  and
                                                   European  Practices,  Plating, Vol.  55, pp.
                                                   1171-1179, November 1968.

-------
   CONTROL  AND  PREVENTION  OF  MINE  DRAINAGE
                                             R. D. HILL
                               U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                          Cincinnati, Ohio
SOURCE
  Associated with most ore and coal bodies are sulfides
and/or sulfosalts. The most  common sulfides are  the
iron, i.e.,  pyrite (FeS2),  pyrrhotite, and marcasite. In
addition, there are  numerous  other  sulfides  and
sulfosalts.  The  general formula for sulfides is  AmXn
where A consists of the metallic elements or sometimes
arsenic, antimony and bismuth (1). The general formula
for sulfosalts is AmBnXp. The elements found in sulfides
and sulfosalts are shown in Table 1. The diversity of the
combinations of the  chemical elements is tremendous,
over 125  occur naturally. Thus, a potential of trace
metals in discharges from mines is always present.
  Iron sulfides when exposed to air and water oxidize to
form ferrous iron, sulfate, and  hydrogen (equation 1).
Pyrite also can be oxidized by ferric iron (equation 2).
The reaction may then proceed to form ferric hydroxide
and more acid (equations 3 and 4).
                                                    materials associated with the  area (clays and minerals),
                                                    and the chemical  characteristics of the metal ion and
                                                    water. The solubility of the metal is a primary factor.

                                                           TABLE 1  ELEMENTS IN SULFIDES AND
                                                                     SULFOSALTS*
Sulfides (AmXn)
A
Ag
Cu
Zn
Fe
Co
Cd
Pb
Hg

As
Ni

S
Se

X
As
Te

                                                                      Rarely Found
Ru
Mn
Ca
Sb
Bi
Pt
Sn
Mo
W
Ti Sb
Au

Bi


    2FeS2 + 2H2O + 702 -> 2FeSO4 + 2H2SO4
                                              (1)
                                                        Sulfosalts  (AmBnXp)
FeS2
              8H2O
                      15Fe2+ +
2S42 +   16H+   (2)        —     —     —
 4FeS04 + 202 2H2SO4 -> 2Fe2(SO4)3 + 2H2O      (3)
    Fe(SO4)3 + 6H2O -> 2Fe(OH)3 +  3H2SO4       (4)
  As seen by the equations, for each mole of iron sulfide
oxidized, four moles of acid are produced. The result is
the lowering of the pH of the water draining from the
material. At the lower pH levels, the heavy metals are
more soluble and enter into the solution. As the iron
sulfides oxidize, the associated sulfides and  sulfosalts
are  either oxidized or exposed to conditions conducive
to  their breakdown with  the release  of diverse metallic
and nonmetallic ions to the environment.
 Under  certain proper  conditions, any  of the ions
shown in  Table 1,  may be present in the drainage. For
example,  the  breakdown of chalcopyrite  (CuFeS2)
would release copper and iron. However, gold, silver, and
selenium are often associated with chalcopyrite and also
may be present. The metal  ion's in the drainage  will
depend  on  the sulfide  and sulfosalts present,  the
A
Cu
Ag
Pb
Sn
B
As
Sb
Bi
Sn
X
S



                                                         * Reference 1.

                                                      Mine drainage occurs not only from the mine itself,
                                                    but also from waste dumps and tailings areas. The latter
                                                    two sources often have a higher concentration of metal
                                                    ions because the sulfides have been concentrated in these
                                                    locations.  In  Table 2, examples of mine drainage are
                                                    presented.
                                                    PREVENTION
                                                      The ultimate solution to the mine drainage problem is
                                                    preventing  its formation.  As  noted  in equations  1
                                                    through 4, the reaction is dependent on air (oxygen) and
                                                    water coming in contact with the sulfides. In addition to
                                                 91

-------
92
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
                                TABLE 2 EXAMPLES OF MINE DRAINAGE
Source
pH
SCU.mg/l
Acidity, mg/1
Fe2,mg/l
Fe3 , mg/1
U,mg/l
Zn, mg/1
Ni, mg/1
Co, mg/1
Cu, mg/1
Mn, mg/1
Al, mg/1
Hg, mg/1
Pb.mg/1
Cd, mg/1
Li, mg/1
V,mg/l
Ag,mg/l
Ti, mg/1
Mg, mg/1
Ca,mg/l
K,mg/l
Na, mg/1
As, mg/1
P,mg/l
Tailings pond
Ontario*
2.0
7,440
14,600
1,450
1,750
72
11.4
32
3.8
3.6
5.6
588
-
0.67
0.05
0.07
20
0.05
15
106
416
69.5
920
0.74
5
Mine adit Mine adit
Colorado Idaho
2.6 3.2
1,610
- -
5
213
- —
17 18.8
0.46
- -
3.9 0.06
8.0
77
0.03
03 2.5
0.07 0.05
— —
— —
<0.01
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
0.07 0.07
- -
Mine adit
Montana
-
—
44
2
16
-
0.14
-
-
0.12
12
0.2
<0.005
0.02
0.001
—
—
—
—
3.7
112
_
6.7
<0.01
1.7
              •Reference 1.

water being a reactant, it serves as the transport media
for the metals. All prevention techniques are based on
excluding  water  and/or  air  from  the  mining
environment.
Air
  Air is necessary during the active operation of an
underground mine. After the ore  has been extracted,
excluding air should be an integral part of the mining
plan. As areas are worked out, blockages should be made
to prevent air from entering that section  of the mine.
Mines should be developed downdip so that they flood
when abandoned.  In  this manner,  water serves as an
oxygen barrier.  Injecting  solid material into the mine,
such  as slope  filling,  should  be  encouraged  and
expended. Not only can the mine  drainage problem be
decreased by blocking the flow of air, but a solid waste
disposal problem can be resolved simultaneously.
  Sealing  adits  to   prevent  air  from  entering  an
underground mine  has been in practice in the coal fields
since the  1920's. This  procedure, at its best, has been
only marginal. Seals  can be built to prevent air froin
entering  the  adit, but  air reaches tie  mine readily
through the fractured outcropping and overburden. With
each change in barometric pressure, air is pumped in and
out  of the mine.  Air  sealing may be  an acceptable
method  in some  hard rock  mines that  have tight
outcrops and overburdens.
  Bulkhead or hydraulic mine  seals have been shown to
be successful (2).  For this method a seal is built in the
adit  and the outcrop is  grouted to prevent water from
leaving the mine. In time, the mine workings are flooded
and oxygen is excluded from the sulfides.
  Excluding oxygen  from the active  surface nine is
impossible. Usually there is a delay between the time the
sulfides are exposed  to  air and  acid mine drainage is
formed. High sulfide bearing material should be exposed
for the shortest time possible. As part  of the mining
operation, this material  should be covered with material
containing little or no sulfides.  The cover material acts as
an oxygen  barrier. Wind  and diffusion  are the only

-------
                                                                              MINE DRAINAGE
                                                  93
driving forces for moving air through the cover material
to the sulfides. The cover material should be vegetated
with grasses, legumes, shrubs, forbs, etc. Not only does
the vegetation serve to stabilize  the cover material and
prevent it from eroding, but upon dying, it  decays and
acts as an oxygen absorber.
  Waste  dumps at  mines are major  sources of mine
drainage  and  should  be  constructed to  prevent  air
movement into them.  Sound techniques are compacting
waste material as it is placed and sandwiching layers of
compacted clay between layers of waste. The slopes of
the dumps should  be kept to  33 percent or less  to
prevent  wind  from driving  air  into the pile. Upon
abandonment, the  surface of the pile should be sealed
with an air barrier. Although many different materials
have been evaluated, soil still remains the best. As in the
case of surface mines, the surface should be vegetated.
Water
  Enough water is usually  available  in  the moist air
within an underground mine or within  the material itself
in a surface mine or waste dump that the requirement
for the  formation  of  mine drainage is met. The other
function of water is as a transport media. It flushes the
oxidation  products from the sulfide  and carries them
into the  environment. By controlling the water, these
products can be contained.
  Provisions should be  made to  prevent  water  from
entering the mining environment, except where it is to
be used for flooding and an oxygen barrier. Diversion
ditches,  dewatering of  the  working, and  sealing  of
fractures are just a  few of the methods available. Water
that does enter the  workings  should be  removed as
rapidly as possible.
CONTROL
  Several  methods are  available to treat  the  mine
drainage that cannot be prevented.
Neutralization
  The most commonly  used method for treating acid
mine drainage   and  removing  heavy  metals is
neutralization. A typical system would include adding an
alkaline  reagent, mixing,  aerating, and  removing  the
precipitate.  Alkaline  reagents that may  be used  are
ammonia,  sodium  carbonate,  sodium  hydroxide,
limestone, and lime. In most cases, lime  is used because
of its lower cost and higher reactivity.
  Most heavy  metals  tend  to precipitate as the pH is
raised. In Table 3, typical pH ranges at  which various
metals will precipitate are  presented. Metals such as
copper,  zinc, iron,  aluminum, manganese, nickel, and
cobalt can be reduced to low levels, less than half mg/1,
with pH adjustment, precipitation, and solids separation.
Cadmium, lead, and  mercury  precipitation  may  be
incomplete  and  other   chemical treatment will  be
required (3).
  In removing  iron, aeration is used to convert Fe II to
   TABLE 3  PRECIPITATION OF HEAVY METALS
             BY pH CONTROL
Ion
Felll
A1III
Cr III
Pbll
Cull
pH Range
3.5-4.5
4.5-6.0*
5.5-6.5
6.0-7.0
6.5-7.5
Ion
Nail
Cdll
Hgll
Fell
Mnll
pH Range
7.0-8.0
7.0-8.0
7.5-8.5
7.5-9.0
8.5-9.5
     *Note: Al will become soluble again at pH greater than 7.5.

Fe III to take advantage of the precipitation of Fe III at
a lower pH.
  In most cases, lime is used for neutralizing. Except for
limestone,  it is the cheapest reagent, and it also reacts
rapidly. Its disadvantage is that  voluminous  sludge is
produced. Although limestone is cheaper and produces a
denser sludge, it  is not effective above  a  pH of 6.5
because of the slow attack of  limestone  by acidity at
higher  pHs.  Two-stage   treatment  with  limestone
followed by lime appears to offer the advantages of both
reagents. The Japanese have studied  this  process on
discharges containing iron, zinc, and manganese (4), and
have a plant that employs it for zinc, cadminum, and iron
(5).  EPA has studied its use on coal acid mine drainage
(6).  Two   or  more  stage treatment  with the proper
selection of pH can be used to separate  heavy metals
with subsequent recovery (3,7).
  Although neutralization can be used to remove heavy
metals and a portion of the  sulfate, the resulting water is
high in  dissolved solids and  sulfate. The disposal of the
sludge is also a problem.
Ion Exchange
  Various ion exchange schemes have been applied to the
treatment  of coal acid mine drainage (8). These schemes
can  upgrade  the  water  quality  to  potable  use.
Modification can  be incorporated  to recover heavy
metals.  Ion exchange has not received wide acceptance
because of difficulties encountered with  resin fouling,
interfering ions,  limited  loading capacity,  cost  of
operating, and  disposal of regenerating solutions. Further
development is needed.
Reverse Osmosis
  Reverse  osmosis  (R.O.)  has  effectively  removed
multivalent ions from mine drainage. Table 4 presents
data from the treatment of coal mine drainage. All heavy
metals should be removed  at about this same level (99
percent  or better). Reverse osmosis is a  concentrating
process  in  which  the pollutants are contained on  one
side  of a  membrane while the water passes through.
Water recoveries (percent of water feed to  unit that is
available as treated  water)  have  been as  high as 90
percent. Water recovery is limited by the precipitation of
material  on  the  membrane when  they  have  been

-------
  94
CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
TABLE 4 TREATMENT OF MINE
REVERSE OSMOSIS
Element
Ca
Mg
Fe, total
Al
Mn
Cu
S04
Acidity
Specific conductance
DRAINAGE BY
Removal— %
98 -99.8
98.5-99.8
98.5-99.9
91.7-99.2
97.8-99.1
98.7-99.5
99.3-99.9
81.0-91.7
95.0-99.9
 concentrated beyond the  materials  saturation point.
 Calcium  sulfate is  usually  the  first material to  be
 precipitated in mine drainage.  Equations have been
 developed to  predict  the  highest  water  recovery
 allowable under any influent condition (9,10).
   Since R.  0. is a concentrating system, the disposal of
 the waste stream is a major problem.  The concentrated
 heavy metals in the waste stream would lend themselves
 better  to  processes  for recovering  the   metals.  For
 systems  where recovery is  not  practiced,  EPA has
 developed  a system  whereby  the  waste stream  is
 neutralized,  the  sludge  removed,  and the neutralized
 water returned to the influent of  the  R. 0. unit. This
 system has  been named "Neutrolosis" and has obtained
 water recoveries in excess of 99 percent (11).
 Cementation
   Taking  advantage of the electromotive force between
 metals  can  be  used to remove and recover  metals from
 mine drainage. A notable  example is  the  recovery  of
 copper by  passing the copper bearing water  through
 shredded  iron. The copper is  "cemented"  to the iron.
 The process may have application in other situations (3).
 Electrolytic
   With  the  use  of electrodeposition processes, several
 metals, such as copper and iron, can be removed from
 mine drainage. The metal is deposited on the cathode of
 an electric  cell from which  it can  subsequently  be
 recovered. This method is only applicable to waters with
 very high concentrations of the metal.
   Electric cells can also be used to oxidize metals from
 the  plus  three  state to  the plus two  state  before
 neutralization or other treatment.  Studies have been
 made on converting ferrous iron to ferric iron in the acid
 state by this method (12).
 SUMMARY
  Many different heavy metals can be found in mine
 drainage because  of  the  variety  of ores  and minerals
associated  with mining operations. The first approach to
control  heavy metal discharges should be preventing the
formation  of the mine drainage. Many ways are available
tor controlling air and water in mining operations. For
                                           the mine  drainage  that  cannot be  prevented, several
                                           treatment  methods  are  available, some  of which offer
                                           ways of recovering the metals.
                                           REFERENCES
                                            1. Hawley,  J. R., The Problem of Acid Mine Drainage
                                                  in  the Providence of  Ontario,  Ontario  Water
                                                  Resources Commission, Toronto, Canada, 1972.
                                            2. Foreman, J. W., Evaluation of Mine Sealing in Butler
                                                  County,  Pennsylvania,  Fourth  Symposium on
                                                  Coal  Mine Drainage Research, Bituminous Coal
                                                  Research,   Incorporated,   Monroeville,
                                                  Pennsylvania, April 1972.
                                            3. Dean, J.  G., F. L. Bosqui, and K.  H. Lanouette,
                                                  Environmental Science & Technology, 6, 6 June
                                                  1972.
                                            4. Shimoiizaka, J., S.  Hasebe, H.   Sato, and T.
                                                  Takahoski, The Utilization of Calcium Carbonate
                                                  and Calcium Hydroxide as Neutralizing Agents in
                                                  Acidic Mine Water Disposal, Technology Reports
                                                  of the Iwate University, Vol. 5, March 1971.
                                            S.Veta,  E., K. Sasamoto, and K. Fukuda, Bacterial
                                                 Oxidation  Treatment  of Waste-Water at
                                                 Hosokura, Joint meeting MMIJ-AIME, Paper T
                                                 IIIb3, Tokyo, May 1972.
                                            6  Wilmoth,   R.  C.,  R.  B. Scott, and R. D. Hill,
                                                 Combination Limestone-Lime Treatment of Acid
                                                 Mine Drainage, Fourth Symposium on Coal Mine
                                                 Drainage Research, Bituminous Coal Research,
                                                 Incorporated,  Monroeville, Pennsylvania, April
                                                 1972.
                                           7.  Ikegami,  T.,  Recent  Practice  of Waste-Water
                                                 Treatment  at  Yanaham Mine,  Joint meeting
                                                 MMIJ-AIME,  Paper T IIIb2, Tokyo, May 1972.
                                           8.  Holmes, J. and K. Schmidt, Ion Exchange Treatment
                                                 of Acid Mine Drainage, Fourth Symposium on
                                                 Coal Mine  Drainage, Bituminous  Coal Research,
                                                 Incorporated,  Monroeville, Pennsylvania, April
                                                 1972.
                                           9.  Gulf Environmental Systems Company,  Acid Mine
                                                 Waste  Treatment  Using  Reverse  Osmosis, EPA
                                                 Water  Pollution Control  Research Series #14010
                                                 DYG,  Washington, D. C., August 1971.
                                          10.  Wilmoth,  R.  C.,  D.  G. Mason, and M. Gupton,
                                                 Treatment of Ferrous Iron Acid Mine Drainage
                                                 by Reverse Osmosis, Fourth Symposium on Coal
                                                 Mine   Drainage,   Bituminous  Coal  Research,
                                                 Incorporated, Monroeville,  Pennsylvania,  April
                                                 1972.
                                          11. Hill,  R.   D.,  R.  C.  Wilmoth,  and   R.  B.  Scott,
                                                 Neutrolosis Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage,
                                                 26th   Annual  Purdue  Industrial  Waste
                                                 Conference, Lafayette, May 1971.
                                          12. Tyco Laboratories,  Incorporated, Electrochemical
                                                 Treatment  of Acid  Mine Waters, EPA Water
                                                 Pollution Control Research Series #14010 FNQ,
                                                 02/72  Washington, D. C., 1972.

-------
       CONTROL OF  PARTICULATE  LEAD  EMISSIONS
                              FROM  AUTOMOBILES*
              E. N. CANTWELL, E. S. JACOBS, W. G. KUNZ, JR., AND V. E. LIBERI
                                E. I. duPont De Nemours & Co.  (Inc.)
                                        Wilmington, Delaware
INTRODUCTION
  Recent proposed regulations concerning fuels and fuel
additive  content by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency  (EPA)  call  for  the  general availability of one
grade of lead-free fuel by July 1, 1974 for use in 1975
and later model cars equipped with catalytic devices (1).
In  addition,  the  proposals  call for a  scheduled
reduction of the lead content of regular and premium
grades of gasolines. Under this  reduction schedule the
maximum content would be limited to  1.25 grams of
lead per gallon by January 1, 1977. EPA justified this
reduction  schedule  on the  basis that  automotive
emissions of lead should be  reduced sufficiently to
reduce the lead content of the air in urban areas by 60
percent by 1977. The implication is  that such reductions
are  best  accomplished by regulating the lead content of
gasoline. However,  there  is an alternative  approach
which is more consistent with the position that control
regulations  should  be  based on   tail  pipe emission
standards rather than regulation of fuel and fuel additive
content. Exhaust particulate lead  traps used on cars
burning leaded  gasoline have  demonstrated the ability to
significantly reduce motor vehicle lead emissions  (2, 3).
  During the past seven years  a number  of different
studies  have been  conducted  at  duPont to develop
methods and  means  to  measure, characterize, and
control vehicle  exhaust particulate  as well as gaseous
emissions. Habibi has developed and described the use of
two different  vehicle  exhaust particulate  sampling
systems  (4). One  measures  the total particulate lead
emission rate from cars operating under normal driving
conditions. The second system, based on a proportional
sampling principle, provides size classification, and other
characterization on  a  representative sample  of the
particulate  matter. A third  approach  to measure and
characterize   vehicle  exhaust  particulate  has  been
described by Pierrard and Crane (5). They measured the
atmospheric visibility  and  soiling  effects of exhaust
particles  from cars using different gasolines. In addition
to using the Habibi sampling procedures, they measured
the effect  on the atmosphere  of  exhaust particulate
emissions from cars driven in  a  1-1/4-mile long unused
Pennsylvania turnpike tunnel. All three of these exhaust
particulate  measurement  techniques were  used  in
evaluating the efficiency of the trap systems described in
this paper.
  A number of trap systems for control of automotive
exhaust particulate have been developed by duPont and
reported previously (2).  Brief  descriptions of  these
systems are included in this paper along with new data
on the  total  lead removal efficiency  of lead traps for
different size  lead particles, and airborne lead emissions
from production and trap-equipped cars driven on the
road in the  unused Pennsylvania  turnpike tunnel.  In
addition, one trapping system  was combined with  a
gaseous emission control system to provide control of all
gaseous and particulate emissions from a vehicle. The
development  and  performance of a new type of lead
trap, designed to replace the exhaust muffler of existing
cars on the road, last the life of the vehicle, and reduce
the airborne lead emissions from cars by greater than 65
percent is presented in this paper.

EXHAUST  PARTICULATE  EMISSIONS - TEST
METHODS
  The particulate matter emitted from automobiles is a
complex mixture  of leads, sals, iron as  rust,  alkaline
earth compounds, soot, carbonaceous material, and tars.
Some of the particulate  matter found  in  the vehicle
exhaust is generated in the engine combustion chamber
and is nucleated and agglomerated in the car's exhaust
system before it is emitted from the  tail pipe. On the
other hand, a large portion of the particulate material
generated in the engine subsequently deposits on various
surfaces of the exhaust system. Later,  this deposited
material flakes  off  and  becomes  re-entrained in  the
*Paper reprinted with permission of the Society of Automotive
Engineers (SAE). Presented at  National SAE Meeting, May 26,
1972,  Detroit, Michigan, and  published as SAE paper No.
720672.
                                                  95

-------
96
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
exhaust gas to be  emitted  from the  car. Thus, many
factors, such as previous history of car operation, age of
exhaust system, mileage,  age of car, type of fuel and
mode of vehicle  operation  during  test, can affect the
total paniculate emission rate.
  The  complexity of the particulate emission  process
makes  the task of measuring the amount of emitted lead
very   difficult.  Satisfactory  sampling  cannot  be
accomplished, for  instance, by simply inserting a probe
in the tail pipe of an operating vehicle and collecting the
effluent for a  short time (3). Such sampling procedures
can result  in  the  collection  of samples with abnormal
particle size distributions  as well  as   unrealistic total
particulate  emission rates. Factors contributing to these
discrepancies include  nonuniformity of the particulate
profile in the tail pipe, nonproportionalityof the sample,
and inaccurate sampling of large particles. Furthermore,
with a short test interval and  without  conditioning of
the vehicle  before  the  test,  the emission  rate may be
abnormal also.
  Satisfactory methods  to provide  meaningful data  on
particulate  emission rates must (a)  employ  a suitable
sampling system for isolating and collecting particulate
matter, (b)  utilize  vehicle  driving   patterns  which
simulate average vehicle operation and are important in
affecting particulate emission processes, (c) provide for
tests of adequate duration to insure  good repeatability,
and (d) employ a vehicle conditioning period prior to a
particulate   emission  test.  Three  different techniques
were used to monitor the  particulate lead emission rates
of  the  production and  emission  control-equipped
vehicles discussed in this paper.
Total Lead  Emissions
  All  "total" lead emission rates reported in this paper
were measured with a total exhaust filter (4) attached to
the vehicle  tail  pipe  while  the car was operated on a
programmed chassis dynamometer (PCD) according to
the  Federal mileage accumulation (Modified  AMA)
schedule (6).
  The  total exhaust  filter shown in Figure  1,  which
mounts directly on the tail pipe of the car is a cylindrical
drum,  18 inches in diameter,  24 inches long, and packed
with a  high efficiency fiberglass medium.  The  total
vehicle  exhaust  flows  through  the  filter  which is
designed to give a low pressure drop across the filter -
less than two inches of water at 70 miles per hour cruise.
The  pressure  drop  across  the  filter  increases  with
accumulation of material  on the filter. In  practice the
filters  are  removed when pressure drop  exceeds six
inches  of  water so that the  use of the filter  does not
at feet the vehicle operation. This increased pressure drop
corresponds to about  500 miles of continuous hot-cycle
operation for a production vehicle and as much as 2,000
to 4,000 miles with a trap-equipped car.  However, the
filter is usually changed  every 1.000  miles for the latter
vehicle  to  provide  more  accurate data  and  as  a
                                  FILTER HOLDER TOP PAN
                                      SUPPORT RODS
                                      HOLDING TOP AND
                                      BOTTOM PANS
                              FILTER PAN HOLDER

                    VEHICLE  EXHAUST
            Figure 1.  Total exhaust filter.

convenience in the operation.
  After each test, the filter unit is disassembled and lead
on the  filter medium is extracted in hydrochloric acid.
The lead deposited on the inlet pipe and internal parts of
the holder is extracted with  an aqueous solution of the
tetrasodium  salt  of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid.
These  solutions  are  analyzed  for  lead  by  atomic
absorption. The efficiency of this filter for exhaust lead
removed has been tested  in a number  of experiments
reported  previously  (4).  Under  normal  driving
conditions, the  unit is 99  percent efficient for  lead
removal.
Lead Particle Size
  The exhaust particulate sampling system developed by
Flabibi (4) and shown in Figure 2, was used in this study
to determine the amount  of lead emitted as a function
of lead  particle size. In this system, the total exhaust gas
from  a vehicle operating on the PCD is introduced into a
duct 22 inches in diameter  and 40 feet long. The exhaust
is  diluted  with  filtered  ambient air using the constant
volume  proportional sampling principle. The  average
dilution of the exhaust during the test cycle was  35 to 1,
which is sufficient to prevent condensation and to cool
the exhaust to  near ambient  temperatures. A  time of
approximately  five   seconds  is  required  for  the
exhaust-air mixture  to  travel  the length of the tunnel
and reach the sampling station.
  To  measure lead particle size, an isokinetic sample of
the uniformly  mixed  aerosol is  taken  at the sample
station  using an Andersen sampler (4) and a Monsanto
Impactor   (4).   These   two  impactor  units are used
                            DYNAMOMETER
                                UNIT
      AIR
 FIBERGLASS
  FILTER
BLOWER
SAMPLING
PROBES
   Figure 2. Proportional sampling system for exhaust
            particulate matter.

-------
                                                               AUTOMOBILE LEAD EMISSIONS
                                                  97
simultaneously  to  provide  a  wide  size  distribution
measurement of exhaust lead particles over the range of
0.3 to 9.0 microns equivalent diameter. Particles smaller
than 0.3 micron equivalent diameter are collected on an
absolute filter  downstream of each  impactor unit.  As
discussed  by Habibi  (4), there is some gravitational
settling of the large particles present in the exhaust along
the tunnel as well as  some turbulent  deposition  of
particles  on the  tunnel  walls.  The amount  of  this
particulate lead deposited in the tunnel is determined
after each run and is  included in the greater than nine
micron equivalent diameter size fraction. Each size data
point reported in this  study represents the average of at
least three separate tests. Each test  was of about  200
miles duration  and was conducted on  the PCD according
to the Federal mileage  accumulation schedule.
Airborne Lead  Emissions
  "Airborne"  lead was  determined  by measuring  the
amount of lead remaining in the  air in a sealed turnpike
tunnel after driving vehicles back and forth on the tunnel
roadway (5). Limited measurements have been made to
determine the  size distribution and average particle size
of  the "airborne" lead  remaining in the tunnel after
driving production vehicles through  the tunnel. These
data  show  that  the  average  lead particle  size  is
approximately  0.25  micron  mass median equivalent
diameter which as discussed later is the average size of
the lead particles found in urban atmospheres.
  For each test, the car was started cold after a 16-hour
soak period and manually driven back and forth over a
fixed course  (Figure  3)  for  a total of  twenty-four
7-mode  Federal  test  cycles  (6) with  the  aid  of an
audiotape  prompter. An absolute filter sampler mounted
on the roof of the test  car collected a spatially integrated
sample of airborne  tunnel particulate matter over  the
driving course during each driving   period. Prior  to
conducting the test, the car was conditioned by driving a
total of fifty 7-mode  Federal test cycles on the road.
The turnpike tunnel was conditioned prior to each test
as previously reported by  Pierrard  and Crane (5). This
conditioning  consisted of flushing the  tunnel with clean
ambient air for about one hour prior  to each test or  for
such time as  required  to lower  the  tunnel  carbon
monoxide  concentration and light scattering coefficient
             -TUNNEL  LENGTH  6200  FT
                   DRIVING COURSE
             r*	      4445   FT      ~
             'OPTICAL  PATH
             'r*	2615 FT—*"
COLD  START;-*-
             '-«—»•• FILTER
           735  FT SAMPLER
to the same level as the outside air.
  Since the test conditions were the same for all cars,
the actual reduction of airborne lead achieved by use of
trap-equipped cars  rather than production vehicles can
be determined directly by comparing the amount of lead
collected  by the roof-top filter during the operation of a
trap-equipped vehicle to the amount collected during the
operation of a  production vehicle.  Such results, after
correcting for a  blank and normalizing for the volume of
air sampled, are  discussed later.
  In addition, the airborne lead emission rates from cars,
expressed in grams of lead per mile, have been calculated
from the  lead collected on the filter. These data provide
a means for direct comparison of the emission rate of
airborne lead from  cars operated on  the road  to the
emission rates of lead from cars operated on the PCD.
Such  data, shown  in  Tables  1, 6,  7,  and 9,  were
calculated from  a knowledge of effective tunnel volume,
volume of air filtered, sampling time,  mean  car speed,
initial air  lead concentration, and mass of lead on the
filter.

LEAD EMISSIONS FROM PRODUCTION VEHICLES
  The lead emission rates of several production vehicles
have  been measured and the data are summarized  in
Table  1. The emissions are expressed in terms of total
emission rate of lead as measured by the total exhaust
filter while the cars were driven on the PCD and airborne
emission rate as measured  in the Pennsylvania turnpike
tunnel.  The   average  total lead  emission rate  is
approximately 0.11 gram of lead per mile. The airborne
lead  emission rate was 0.050  gram of  lead per mile or
less  than  half the  total  amount emitted. As will be
shown later (Figures 7 and 8) the lead emission rate of a
production vehicle is quite variable even over relatively
long sampling periods  of up to  several hundred miles.
The  values shown for the emission rates in Table 1 are
       TABLE 1   LEAD EMISSION RATE FROM
                  PRODUCTION VEHICLES
  Vehicle
Mileage
Emission rate,
grams of lead
   per mile
                                                                                        Total
                                          Airborne
      Figure 3. Pennsylvania Turnpike tunnel.
F47
C-76
C-82
H-l
CW-1
CW-21
C-40
C-83

0 to 54,000
0 to 5 5, 000
8,000
41 ,000
21,000
1 1 ,000
0 to 28 ,000
21,000
Average
0.086
0.106




0.102
0.14
0.108


0.039
0.061
0.047
0.055


0.050

-------
98
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
the average results of at least three runs at the indicated
mileages. In view of the variability in  emission rates at
different mileages on  a given car and the  variability
among cars it is not  possible to measure the amount of
lead emitted  from a  production vehicle at any one time
and expect to  obtain a representative  value of the lead
emission rate of vehicles. Conversely, as is shown also in
Figures 7 and  8, the  lead emission  rate  of a vehicle
equipped  with  a trapping  system is relatively constant
and the variations  are  much less than that  for  the
standard vehicle. As a  consequence, in all subsequent
comparisons  of the lead emission rates for  the trap  cars
with that of  standard cars  the measured value of a given
trap car will be  compared with the average values for
production vehicles as given in Table 1.
   The size distributions  of the lead emitted from three
of the production vehicles listed in Table 1 have been
determined  at  several  points  during  mileage
accumulation on these vehicles using the Federal mileage
accumulation schedule (6). These data are summarized
in  Table 2. The total amount of lead  emitted from the
vehicles  during the size measurements  averaged just less
 than 0.1  gram  per mile which is a quite close check on
the total value  given  in  Table 1. The  emitted  lead
associated with particles greater than  nine  microns  in
equivalent diameter averaged 0.031 gram per mile  or
approximately  30 percent of the  total amount of lead
emitted. This material is relatively coarse and would not
be expected  to remain airborne for any significant length
of time. Approximately  0.02 gram of  lead per  mile was
emitted  in   the  size range from  nine to  one microns
 equivalent diameters; particles of this  size range might
 lemain in the  atmosphere for at least a short length  of
 time.  The rate of lead emission of particles of less  than
 one micron  in diameter was equal to 0.031 gram per
                          mile or about 30 percent of the total lead emitted. These
                          small  particles  would  become  airborne and  remain
                          suspended for a  significant length  of  time.  A further
                          breakdown of the submicron  lead  particles shows  that
                          approximately 0.022 gram of  lead per mile or about 20
                          percent  is  emitted  as  particles  below 0.3  micron
                          equivalent diameter.
                            In the same manner  that the total lead emission rate
                          varies with  mileage,  the amount  of lead emitted in
                          various size fractions also varies. However, the variation
                          in  emission  rate  is  more pronounced  for  the  large
                          particles, i.e., those  greater  than  nine  microns.  This
                          variability is to be expected since the large particles are
                          the result of re-entrainment of material which flakes off
                          the walls of the exhaust system. The amount of material
                          available for re-entrainment and the extent of flaking is
                          dependent  upon  previous driving history  of  the car as
                          well as  the mode  of  car  operation  or the driving cycle
                          used during the emission  test. Thus, with relatively new
                          cars,  there will be little or  no material available for
                          re-entrainment in the  exhaust system giving rise to  very
                          low emission  rate of  large particles.  Similarly, under
                          steady-state driving conditions there is  little  thermal
                          expansion and contraction of the exhaust system and
                          flaking and subsequent re-entrainment is minimal
                            The smaller lead particles  are combustion  generated
                          and thus the  absolute  lead emission rate is relatively
                          constant as long as the test cycle  or  driving condition
                          remains the same. However, due to the wide fluctuations
                          of  the  emission  rate  of large particles, the  relative
                          amount of the small  particles compared  with the  total
                          amount emitted  will  fluctuate   also.  For  example,
                          measurements made with relatively low mileage vehicles
                          or  measurements  made  under  steady-state  test
                          conditions,  where  the  emission rate  of  large particles
                     TABLE 2   LEAD PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FROM PRODUCTION
                                VEHICLES
                 Vehicle
Mileage
   Emission rates,
grams of lead per mile
                                                             Size in microns

C-40
c-;o
C-40
C-40
F-47
F47
F-47
C-76
C-76
C-76


5 ,000
16,000
21,000
28,000
3,000
20,000
55,000
3,000
20,000
55,000
Average
Total
0.102
0.095
0.083
0.115

0.086


0.106

0.098
>9
0.028
0.037
0.036
0.066
0.008
0.027
0.024
0.015
0.056
0.017
0.031
9 to 1
0.029
0.024
0.017
0.028
0.008
0.010
0.008
0.023
0.022
0.008
0.018
<1
0.046
0.034
0.030
0.022
0.022
0.020
0.017
0.044
0.044
0.027
0.031
<0.3
0.031
0.024
0.022
0.013
0.019
0.015
0.015
0.031
0.028
0.022
0.022

-------
                                                               AUTOMOBILE LEAD EMISSIONS
                                                  99
would be very low, will lead to the erroneous conclusion
that most of the lead is omitted from the car as very fine
particles. These observations undoubtedly explain why
some investigators have reported that the majority of the
lead is emitted as submicron particles.
ATMOSPHERIC LEAD PARTICLE SIZE
  To place the size of the lead emitted from production
vehicles  in proper perspective,  it is  worthwhile  to
examine the particle size distribution of the lead in  the
atmosphere in various urban areas. Many investigators
have made such  measurements  and  their  data  are
summarized  in  Table   3  (7,  8,  9). The  most
comprehensive work was carried out by Robinson and
Ludwig who sampled the atmosphere in 59 urban areas
and  found that  the  average  size or  mass  median
equivalent diameter of the particles which contain lead
was 0.25 micron in diameter. This means that one-half
of all the lead by weight was associated with particles of
greater than 0.25 micron in diameter and one-half of  the
lead by weight in the air was associated with particles of
less than 0.25 micron in diameter.  Other investigators
have also measured  average  size  of lead-containing
particles in the atmosphere  and in general their values
are reasonably in agreement with those of Robinson and
Ludwig. Habibi and Pierrard of duPont also  measured
the size  distribution of atmospheric lead at two widely
separated locations and as shown  in Table 3  found the
average particle size to be approximately 0.25 micron.
Thus,  an average  particle size for the lead-containing
particulate matter in the atmosphere would appear to be
0.25 micron mass median equivalent diameter.
  When the lead particle size distribution emitted from
production vehicles, as given in Table 2, is examined in
 terms of the size of the lead particles in the atmosphere,
 it can be seen that about 20 percent of the lead emitted
 from  production  vehicles consists of particles smaller
 than the average size of the lead particles found in the
 urban atmosphere. Thus,  for a trapping system to be
 effective in reducing the amount  of lead in the urban
 atmosphere it  must reduce the total amount of lead
 emitted from a vehicle. But, it must also be effective in
 reducing  the  airborne lead  which includes the lead
 emitted  as particles smaller than one  micron and, in
 particular,  the  particles  smaller  than  0.25 micron
 equivalent  diameter.
 LEAD   EMISSIONS
 VEHICLES
FROM  TRAP-EQUIPPED
  A number of different studies have been conducted at
duPont to determine the best way to reduce the lead
particulate exhaust  emissions  from cars operated on
commercial  gasolines.  These studies  have  included
electrostatic  precipitation,  changes in  the  chemical
composition of the particulate lead, as well as chemical
and mechanical  filtration.  However, the most durable
and effective way to attain this reduction is to separate
the particles from the gas stream and then retain or trap
the  particulate  matter  in  the exhaust system  using
inertial separation devices.
  Several such exhaust particulate trapping systems have
been devised and described previously (2). One of these
systems  designated  Trap System A,  consists of  the
substitution of  fluted pipes in place  of the  standard
exhaust pipes and the use of a cyclone trap. The fluted
pipes increased the heat transfer from the exhaust gas to
the ambient air and provided  the additional cooling
necessary  to initiate particulate lead  formation in  the
                             TABLE 3  SIZE OF ATMOSPHERIC LEAD
                                        PARTICLES
Investigator
Robinson and
Ludwig
Lee,
Robinson and
Wagman
Lundgren
Habibi
Pierrard
Weighted
Location
sampled
59 urban
areas
Downtown
Cincinnati
Suburban
Cincinnati
Riverside,
California
Wilmington,
Delaware
El Monte,
California
Average
Average size
(mass median
equivalent diameter),
microns
0.25
0.2
0.4
0.5
0.24
0.2
0.25

-------
100
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
exhaust system.  The  particles   of lead  which  were
formed in the fluted exhaust pipe were removed from
the exhaust stream in simple cyclone traps and the lead
particles stored in the cyclone trap collection chamber.
This trap system  was operated for 64,000 miles on the
PCD using  the Federal  mileage accumulation schedule
and a commercial gasoline containing 2.5 grams of lead
per gallon.  When the lead emission rates  from this
vehicle, as determined by the total exhaust filter, were
compared with those of a production car it  was found
that the trapping system reduced the total lead emissions
by 70 percent.
Trap System B
  A more advanced  particulate trap  system  designated
Trap System B was devised to provide additional cooling
and  agglomeration.  A schematic  diagram  of this trap
system is shown in Figure 4. A dual exhaust system was
used. On each side  of the dual system two  pipes were
lined  internally   with  wire  mesh  to  promote
agglomeration  of the particles.  In addition, the dual
pipes exhausted into a common box filled with fine wire
mesh.  The  gases  flowed from  this mesh  box  to two
cyclone particle  separators, one  in  each  of the rear
fender  wells. The  design of the cyclone separation box is
shown  in Figure 5.  A photograph  of the under side of
the car with the  Trap System B  installed is shown in
Figure 6.
  The performance of the Trap System B was evaluated
in a four-car test in which two 1969 Fords and two 1969
Chevrolets  were  used.  One  car  of  each  make was
FLUTED  PIPES
           MESH
                                  CYCLONE TRAP
                      LINED  PIPES
                  MESH-FILLED  BOX

              Figure 4. Trap System B
                       CYCLONE
                                COLLECTION
                                CHAMBER
 OUT
               MESH  WITH OPEN
              FLOW TUBES

   Figure 5.  Cyclone separator for exhaust particulate
            matter.
                                                                         PKH 277

                                                                    CYCL       RAPS
 Figure 6.  Exhaust particulate matter Trap System B.


equipped with the trap system and their performance in
terms  of  lead  emission  rates  compared  with  the
production   cars  which retained  the  unmodified
conventional exhaust systems.  Mileage was accumulated
on  the  PCD  using the  Federal  mileage accumulation
schedule. Commercial gasoline containing 2.5 grams of
lead per gallon  was used for  all  mileage accumulation
and emission test work.
  The  total  amount  of lead  emitted  from all four
vehicles was  monitored  continuously throughout  the
test, which lasted almost 60,000 miles, by  the  use of
total exhaust  filters. The results in  terms of grams of
lead emitted per mile of  operation as a function  of test
miles  are shown in Figures 7 and 8  for the  production
vehicles and for  the vehicles equipped with Trap System
B. As  previously discussed, it is  obvious that the lead
emission rates from the production  vehicles are quite
variable with  time  and  that  the  lead emission  rate
measured at any instant of time  in the life history of an
automobile may  not  be representative of the  average
amount of  lead emitted over its lifetime. Conversely, the
trap system was quite effective in reducing the amount
of lead emitted and also in  reducing the variations in the
amount of lead  emitted. The  average  amounts of lead
emitted from  the  production  vehicles and the vehicles
equipped with Trap System  B throughout  the  60.000

-------
                                                              AUTOMOBILE LEAD EMISSIONS
                                                                                               101
  0.3
  0.2
 2
 O
           1969 FORDS
       PRODUCTION VEHICLE
            10     20     30     40
                THOUSANDS OF MILES
                                        50
                                               60
Figure 7.  Lead emission rates for 1969 Fords with and
         without Trap System B.
   0.3
  LU
  _J
  i
  \
  -0
  Q.
  O 0.2
  o
    1969 CHEVROLETS
PRODUCTION
 VEHICLE
             10
                    20     30     40
                  THOUSANDS OF  MILES
                                         50
                                                60
Figure 8.  Lead emission rates for 1969 Chevrolets with
         and without Trap System B.

test miles are shown in Figure 9.
  In addition to measuring the total lead emission rates,
the particle size distribution of the emitted lead was
determined in the 40-foot tunnel. The data for the two
cars equipped with Trap System B are shown in Table 4.
                                              -O
                                              a.

                                              O
   0.12


   0.10


   0.08


   0.06


   0.04


   0.02


   0
                                                                                       PRODUCTION
                                                                  PRODUCTION
                                                          1969  FORDS
                                1969 CHEVROLETS
Figure 9.  Average lead emission rates with and without
          Trap System B.

These  data along with similar data obtained with the
production  vehicles  are  shown  in Figure  10. The
reduction  in lead emission  rate achieved with  Trap
System B when  compared with the lead emission rates
from production vehicles is summarized in Table 5.
  Trap  System B  was most  effective in reducing lead
emission rates of both the large and the small particles.
Trap System B reduced the total amount of lead emitted
from  production   vehicles by  some   82 percent.
Examination of the size distribution of the emitted lead
reveals  that, as  expected, the  trapping  system was
particularly effective in reducing the large particles. The
lead particles with sizes greater than nine microns were
reduced by 94 percent. Even in the case of the smaller
size fractions, significant reductions in emission  rates
were accomplished. There was an 88 percent reduction
of the amount of particles emitted  in the  size fraction
from  nine to one microns and a  65 to  71 percent
reduction  in mass of particles of less than  one micron
diameter.  This  reduction  in emission of  the  small
                 TABLE 4  LEAD PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION FROM PRODUCTION
                            VEHICLES WITH TRAP SYSTEM B
                                                           Emission rates,
                                                       grams of lead per mile
               Vehicle
                    Mileage
                                                           Size in Microns

F48
F-48
F48
C-77
C-77
C-77


3,000
20,000
55,000
3,000
20,000
55,000
Average
Total

0.012


0.022

0.017
>9
0.0004
0.003
-
0.0005
0.004
0.001
0.002
9 to 1
0.0005
0.003
-
0.0006
0.005
0.002
0.002
<1
0.005
0.012
-
0.007
0.020
0.011
0.011
<0.3
0.004
0.005
—
0.005
0.010
0.008
0.006

-------
102
        CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
                      TABLE 5   LEAD EMISSION REDUCTION WITH TRAP SYSTEM B
                                                            Reduction from
                                                        production vehicle, %*
Vehicle
F-48
F-48
F-48
C-77
C-77
C-77

Mileage
3,000
20,000
55.000
3.000
20,000
55.000
Average

Total

86


79

82

>9
97
91
-
97
87
97
94
Size in microns
9 to 1
97
83
-
97
72
89
88

<1
84
61
-
78
36
65
65

<0.3
82
77
—
77
55
64
71
                 'See Tables 1,2, and 4 for lead emission rates.
particles is most important since these are the  particles
which  will  tend  to  remain  airborne  and  which
correspond in size to the particles containing lead found
in the atmosphere of urban areas.
  The  foregoing results obtained with Trap System  B
demonstrate that it  is feasible to control the emission of
particulate lead matter from vehicles. Furthermore, not
only is the total amount of lead emitted from the vehicle
reduced substantially, but the fine particles which could
be expected to  remain airborne for significant lengths of
time are reduced also. However,  this trapping system is
somewhat complex. Accordingly, simpler systems have
been devised in an  attempt  to reduce the cost and the
complexity of the  system while  retaining or improving
the high efficiency demonstrated with Trap System B.
Trap System C
  A simpler version of Trap System B was  devised and
 S

 _E
 CL

 O
    0.03
0.02
    0 01
               I PRODUCTION

                TRAP
                SYSTEM  B
            > 9       9TO  1       <1       < o.3
              LEAD  PARTICLE SIZE, MICRONS

Figure 10. Lead emission rates from Trap System B as a
          function of particle size.
has been designated Trap System C. This system, shown
schematically in Figure 11, consists of dual, fluted pipes
which  serve  to  cool  the  exhaust  gases  and initiate
formation of the lead particulate matter. The gas flows
from the  fluted  pipes into a  common  box filled with
stainless  steel  wire  mesh and  through dual cyclone
collection traps similar to  the units used in Trap System
B.
  The effectiveness of Trap System C was determined by
measuring the airborne lead emission rate of production
vehicles before  and after  the installation  of  the trap
system. Two  vehicles, C-82 and  H-l, were tested in the
Pennsylvania  turnpike tunnel as production vehicles. At
the conclusion of these tests the production exhaust
system was removed and  Trap System C was installed.
The trapping systems which were installed had already
accumulated about 17,000 miles of consumer operation
in a field  service test using commercial leaded  gasolines
(10). After the traps were  installed on the two vehicles
the cars were operated in excess of 2,000 miles on the
PCD to recondition the systems  prior to the tests at the
Pennsylvania  turnpike tunnel.  In the case of C-94, the
car had been operated as a duPont total emission control
system vehicle for  10,500 miles (see Ref.  10 and the

                             CYCLONE TRAP
             FLUTED  EXHAUST  PIPE
                                                                       MESH-FILLED  BOX
                                                     Figure 1 1 . Exhaust particulate matter Trap System C.

-------
                                                               AUTOMOBILE LEAD EMISSIONS
                                                                                             103
  d 0.08 -
  £
  \

  £ 0.06
  < 0.04
  Z
  o
    0.02
AVERAGE 0.050
    H-l
                        CW-21
                       AVERAGE 0.018

                                C-94
                                                              EXHAUST GAS R EC IRCU LATION  SYSTEM
            PRODUCTION
                                  TRAP  SYSTEM C
   Figure 12.  Airborne lead emission rates with Trap
              System C.

next section for description of these vehicles). To test
the trap  system only, the gaseous emission control
system consisting of thermal reactors and exhaust gas
recirculation systems was  removed, the car restored to a
production vehicle except for  the  Trap  System C, the
vehicle operated  for another  2,000  miles, and  then
tested in the Pennsylvania turnpike tunnel to determine
airborne lead emission rates.
  The data obtained with  the  vehicles  equipped with
Trap System C are shown in Table 6 and are compared
with the airborne emission  rates of production vehicles
in Figure  12. Trap System  C was  effective in reducing
airborne emission rates to  an  average  value of  0.018
gram of lead per mile. When this value is  compared with
the airborne lead emission rate  of production vehicles it
can be seen that  Trap System C reduced the amount of
airborne lead emitted by 64 percent.

duPont Total Emission Control System Vehicles
  Trap System C has been combined with other systems
to control  the  gaseous  exhaust emissions from vehicles
to produce a total emission  control system or TECS I
vehicle (10). The components of the TECS vehicle are
                                                        AIR
                                                        PUMP
                                                            THERMAL
                                                            REACTORS
TRAPPING
SYSTEM
                                                Figure 13. duPont total emission control system.

                                            shown schematically in Figure 13. The exhaust manifold
                                            thermal reactors  are  used  in conjunction  with  an air
                                            pump  to  provide a  high temperature  zone where the
                                            hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide in the exhaust are
                                            oxidized.  An  exhaust gas  recirculation  system  is
                                            combined with  various carburetor modifications to
                                            control the  emission of oxides  of nitrogen. A more
                                            complete  description  of  these vehicles  and  their
                                            performance  in  controlling gaseous emissions  can be
                                            found  in References (2, 10, and 11). Trap System C as
                                            utilized  in  these  TECS  vehicles  is  shown  in the
                                            photograph in Figure 14.
                                              The  lead emission rates  from several of the duPont
                                            TECS  vehicles  have been  measured and  the data
                                            summarized  in Table 7. The average total lead emission
                                            rate for these vehicles was  0.016 gram per mile. When
                                            this value is  compared with the  value of the 0.108 gram
                                            per mile for production vehicles it can be seen that the
                                            TECS vehicles reduced the total amount of lead emitted
                                            to the environment by  85  percent. The  amount of
                                            airborne lead emitted by the TECS vehicles as measured
                                            in the Pennsylvania turnpike tunnel averaged 0.015 gram
                                            per mile corresponding to a reduction of 70 percent as
                                            compared with the airborne  emission rates of production
                                            vehicles.
TABLE 6 LEAD EMISSION RATE FROM PRODUCTION


Vehicle
C-82
H-l
C-94
VEHICLES

Mileage
20,000
20,000
13,000
Average
WITH TRAP SYSTEM C
Airborne lead
emission rate,
grams of lead
per mile
0.022
0.014
0.019
0.018

Reduction
in airborne
lead emission
rate compared
to production
vehicles, %*
56
72
62
64
                      *See Table 1 for airborne lead emission rate for production vehicles.

-------
104
           CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
                                               MESH-FILLED  BOX
FLUTED EXHAUST  PIPE
                                                                         CYCLONE  TRAPS
   EXHAUST RECIRCULATION  LINE
                            Figure 14. Trap System C as a part of the duPont TECS.
 Muffler Lead Traps
   The trapping systems as typified by Systems B and C
 are quite effective in reducing the emission of paniculate
 lead  from vehicles  but they are  complex and  would
 probably  be  suitable  only for  installation  on new
 vehicles at time  of manufacture. In an effort to reduce
 the complexity and  therefore the cost of the system and
 also  to  develop systems  which  might   be  used  as
 replacement items for mufflers on existing cars on the
 road, a program to develop a lead trap the size and shape
 of a  production  muffler was initiated. The basis of the
 muffler  lead  trap  is  the  use  of  a  more  efficient
 agglomerating medium than the stainless steel wire mesh.
 One  method  of  improving the agglomeration of  lead
 particles is to utilize a material with high  surface  area

   TABLE?  LEAD  EMISSION RATE FROM DUPONT
             TECS  VEHICLES
Vehicle
         Mileage
                                 Emission rate.
                             &rams of lead Per

C-84
C-85
C-86
C-*6
C-94

Reduction

1. 000
9.400
2b.OOO
30.000
10.500
Average
in lead
Total
0.021
0.011
0.015


0.016
85
Airborne



0.009
0.022
0.015
70
which has an  affinity for the lead compounds in the
exhaust.  Such a material is high surface area alumina
that has  been  used for a support in catalytic reactors.
Accordingly,  traps  incorporating high  surface  area
alumina in combination with cyclone separators have
been built and tested.
  A muffler lead trap, designated Type 11, incorporated
extended  surface alumina  in the form of one-quarter
inch diameter pellets and  two  cyclone  separators in
parallel. The design of this trap  is shown in Figure 15.
This trap is  the  same overall  size  and shape as  a
production muffler. Exhaust gas enters one end of the
trap, flows through the bed of alumina pellets, and into
the two  cyclones. After exiting  from  the cyclones the
exhaust flows into a plenum chamber at the downstream
end of the trap. This trap was installed  in place of the
standard  muffler on a  production vehicle  and  was
operated on  the  PCD under  the  Federal  mileage
accumulation  schedule  for  25,000 miles. During this
time the lead emission rate was monitored and the values
obtained are shown in Table 8.
  The average total lead emission rate obtained with this
trap was 0.011 gram of lead per mile or a 90 percent
reduction when compared with a  production vehicle.
After  about 20,000  miles,  it  was  observed  that
 emission rate compared
 with production vehicles.
 percent I see Table 1 for
 production vehicles I
i [CYCLONE cj : : ; :;
/ Fl
ALUMINA i
PELLETS ]
!r~
d]^7
Q
d

                                                                Figure 15. Muffler lead trap type II.

-------
                                                              AUTOMOBILE LEAD EMISSIONS
                                                                                   105
     TABLE 8  LEAD EMISSION RATE FROM
               PRODUCTION VEHICLE WITH
               MUFFLER LEAD TRAP TYPE II
    Mileage
Vehicle C-83
           Emission rate,
        grams of lead per mile
                            Total
                   Airborne
0
6,000
9,000
12,000
15,000
18,000
21,000
25,000
Average
Reduction in lead
emissions compared
with production vehicles,
percent (see Table 1 for
production vehicles)

0.012
0.014
0.009
0.008
0.006
0.016
0.014
0.011
90








0.021*
0.021*
58*

     *Trap filled to capacity with collected lead salts.

 particulate lead  was being emitted in relatively  large
 quantities from the tail  pipe of the vehicle during high
 speed operation.  Investigations revealed that the cyclone
 collection chambers had become totally filled with the
 collected lead salts and that this material  was being
 re-entrained in the  exhaust. An attempt was made to
 clean out  some of  the  material in  the  collection
 chambers  and  the vehicle  was then  taken to  the
 Pennsylvania  turnpike  tunnel  for determination  of
 airborne lead emission rates. The tests in the turnpike
 tunnel showed an airborne emission rate of 0.021 gram
 per mile or a 58  percent reduction from the production
 vehicles.  This relatively poor  showing in  terms  of
 airborne lead emission rate was due  to the fact that
 significant quantities of lead were still being re-entrained
 from the particle collection chambers  and the trap was
 simply too full of lead to be fully effective in reducing
 the amount of lead emitted from the vehicle.
  The Type II trap was disassembled after 25,000 miles
 of operation. The alumina pellets were undamaged and
 showed  no  signs of  any  attrition.  The material
 accumulated in the cyclone collection  chambers was
 analyzed  and found to contain  only trace amounts of
 alumina  confirming that very  little  attrition of  the
 pellets had occurred.
  To overcome  the problem of  re-entrainment of the
 collected  lead  material  which  had occurred with  the
Type II trap another muffler lead trap, designated Type
III, was built. This trap is shown in Figure 16. It was of






— !— 	 1
.CY£LON
i
, i A ID /v
! PELL
I
1 	 .

E m
UNA <
ETS I
»-
c
3
LZ
3
                                             Figure 16. Muffler lead trap type III.

                                   the same  overall size and shape as the Type II trap but
                                   the internal components had been rearranged to increase
                                   the volume of the particle collection chamber. The flow
                                   path was  quite similar to that of the Type II trap; the
                                   exhaust gases flowed  first through the bed of alumina
                                   pellets then in  parallel through the cyclones and exited
                                   from  the  plenum chamber. This trap was installed in
                                   place  of  the production  muffler on a vehicle and is
                                   currently  under test. Four  thousand miles have  been
                                   accumulated on  the  PCD using the Federal mileage
                                   accumulation schedule. The lead  emission rate from the
                                   vehicle as  determined to date is shown in Table 9.
                                     The total amount of lead emitted  as measured by the
                                   total  filter averaged 0.010 gram of lead per mile and
                                   compared with  the production vehicle the Type III trap
                                   has reduced the total amount of lead by 91 percent. This
                                   vehicle  has  been tested  at  the  Pennsylvania turnpike
                                   tunnel to  determine the airborne lead emission rate and
                                   the value  was found to be 0.008 gram of airborne lead
                                   per mile.  When this value  is compared  with  the
                                   production vehicles it can be seen that the Type III trap
                                   reduced the airborne lead emission rate by 84 percent.
                                     These preliminary results on the Type III muffler lead
                                   trap are most encouraging. The trap has been designed to
                                   have sufficient  collection capacity to hold all the lead
                                   salts emitted from the vehicle for at least 50,000 miles.
                                        TABLE 9  LEAD EMISSION RATE FROM
                                                  PRODUCTION VEHICLE WITH
                                                  MUFFLER LEAD TRAP TYPE III
                                                      Vehicle C-82
                                       Mileage
   Emission rate,
grams of lead per mile

2,000
4,000
Average
Reduction in lead
Total
0.009
0.010
0.010
91
Airborne
0.008
0.008
84
                                       emission rate compared
                                       with production vehicles,
                                       percent (see Table 1 for
                                       production vehicles)

-------
106
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
Further testing of this trap is planned to determine the
reduction in lead emissions over extended mileage and to
determine the ultimate effective life of the trap.
EFFECT OF  TRAP  SYSTEMS ON ATMOSPHERIC
LEAD LEVELS
  From the foregoing discussion it is obvious that the
various trapping systems investigated are quite effective
in reducing the amount of lead emitted from the tail
pipe of vehicles. However, the important question that
must  be resolved  is  whether  this  reduction  in  lead
emissions from the tail pipe will translate into a similar
reduction  in  the  amount  of  lead contained  in  the
atmosphere. Direct  measurements are available to answer
this question and to demonstrate the effectiveness of the
trapping  systems.  The amounts of lead collected from
the air in the  Pennsylvania turnpike tunnel after driving
various vehicles on  the road in the tunnel were measured
and the results of these measurements are summarized in
Table 10.
  Four different   vehicles  with  production  exhaust
systems were run for a  total  of 13 tests in  the
Pennsylvania turnpike  tunnel. The air in the  tunnel was
sampled, as described earlier, and the average amount of
lead collected on the sampling filter was found to be 101
micrograms. Similarly, three different vehicles equipped
with Trap System  C were run for a total of ten tests in
the tunnel.  The average amount of lead  collected from
the air in the tunnel after running the  cars with Trap
System C was 37 micrograms. Comparison of these two
numbers shows that Trap System C reduced the amount
of lead in the air by 64 percent.
  Two other  vehicles  equipped with the duPont total
emission  control  system,  which  consists  of  thermal
reactor and exhaust gas recirculation systems and which
includes Trap System  C, were run in the Pennsylvania
turnpike  tunnel for a  total  of six  tests. The  average
airborne lead  collected from the air  in the tunnel after
running  these  vehicles  was  29  micrograms and
comparison  of this number to that obtained with the
production vehicles shows that the reduction in airborne
lead caused  by the installation  of the  total emission
control system was 71 percent.
  One vehicle equipped with muffler lead trap Type III
was run in the tunnel for a total of three tests and the
average amount  of  airborne  lead  collected  on the
sampling filter was found to be  16 micrograms. Once
again,  comparison  of this value  to the value of 101
micrograms  for the  production  vehicles  showed the
reduction  of airborne lead caused by the installation of
the Type III muffler lead trap was  84 percent.
  It is clear that not only do these trap systems bring
about significant reductions in the total amount of lead
emitted from the tail  pipe of vehicles but they are most
effective  also in reducing the  actual  amount  of lead
remaining in  the air after cars have been driven on the
road in a representative consumer-type driving cycle.
CONCLUSIONS
• Vehicle  exhaust  particulate lead traps are effective ir.
  reducing the  total  amount  of lead  emitted  from
  production vehicles  operated on  commercial leaded
  gasoline  by  82  to  91  percent  as  measured by
  laboratory tests.
• Laboratory  size-measurement  of the  emitted lead
  particles showed that the  traps not only reduced the
  large size particles by better than 90 percent, but also
  reduced the  particles smaller  than  0.3  micron (or
  particles which are in the same size range  as those
  found in urban atmosphere) by 71 percent.
• These same lead  traps reduced the amount of emitted
  airborne lead  particles  by 64  to 84  percent when
  measured in road tests in a vehicular turnpike tunnel.
• Vehicles  equipped  with lead  traps for particulate
  control  and  a  gaseous  emission  control  system
  consisting of thermal manifold reactor and exhaust gas
         TABLE 10 REDUCTION OF AIRBORNE LEAD IN THE PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE
                    TUNNEL DUE TO THE USE OF TRAP SYSTEMS
Exhaust
systems
Production
Trap System C
duPont total
emission control
system (Trap
System C )
Muffler lead trap
type III
No. of No. of
cars tests
4 13
3 10


1 6
1 3
Average*
airborne lead
collected on
filter , /Kg
101
37


29
16
Reduction in airborne
lead,%

64


71
84
         •Corrected for differences in total volume of air sampled and ambient air lead levels.

-------
                                                             AUTOMOBILE LEAD EMISSIONS
                                               107
 recalculation  systems, reduced total lead emitted by
 85 percent and lead in the air in the vehicular tunnel
 was  reduced by 71  percent when  compared  with
 production vehicles.
 Compact,  effective  lead traps  which  incorporate
 alumina  pellets  and  cyclone collectors have  been
 developed  which  are  suitable for replacement of
 mufflers on existing cars now on the road.
 These  lead traps are relatively simple and  have no
 moving parts. Based on the reported tests, they do not
 deteriorate in effectiveness with mileage, require no
 maintenance, and should last the life of the vehicle.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 The  authors  wish  to acknowledge R.  A. Crane, K.
Habibi, and J. M. Pierrard for their contributions to the
data and their helpful interpretations and discussions.
Also, the authors are indebted to L. Chambers, J. G.
Cmorik,  K. 0. Koefoed, and T. A. Phillips for some of
the data and information  on  the performance of the
trap systems.
REFERENCES
 1. Environmental Protection  Agency,  Regulation of
      Fuels and Fuel Additives — Lead and Phosphorus
      Additives in  Motor Gasoline,  Federal  Register,
      37, No. 36, Wednesday,  February 23, 1972.
 2. Habibi, K., E. S. Jacobs, W. G. Kunz, Jr., and  D. L.
      Pastell, Characterization and Control of Gaseous
      and  Particulate  Exhaust  Emissions From
      Vehicles, presented at the Air Pollution Control
      Association, West Coat  Section, Fifth Technical
      Meeting, San Francisco,  California, October 8—9,
      1970.
 3. Ter  Haar, G. L., D. L. Lenane, J. N. Hu, and M.
      Brandt, Composition,  Size,  and  Control of
      Automotive Exhaust Particulates, Journal of Air
      Pollution Control Association, 22, 39,1972.
 4. Habibi, K., Characterization of Particulate Lead in
       Vehicle  Exhaust  — Experimental  Techniques,
       Environmental Science and  Technology, 4, No.
       3, 239-248, March, 1970.
 5. Pierrard, J.  M. and R. A.  Crane, The  Effect of
       Gasoline Compositional Changes on Atmospheric
       Visibility and Soiling, presented to the Society
       of  Automotive  Engineers  Automotive
       Engineering Congress, Detroit,  Michigan, Paper
       No. 720253, January 10-14,1972.
 6. U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare,
       Part  II,  Control of Air Pollution From  New
       Motor Vehicles and New Motor  Vehicle Engines,
       Federal Register 33, No. 2, January, 1968.
 7. Robinson,  E.  and  F  L.  Ludwig,  Particle  Size
       Distribution of Urban Lead Aerosols,  Journal
       of  the  Air Pollution Control Association, 17,
       664-668, 1967.
 8. Lee,  R. E.,  R.   K. Patterson, and  J.  Wagman,
       Particle-Size Distribution of Metal Components
       in Urban Air, Journal Environmental Science and
       Technology, 2, 288-290,1968.
 9. Lundgren, D. A., Atmospheric Aerosol Composition
       and Concentration as a Function of Particle Size
       and of  Time,   Journal of the  Air  Pollution
       Control Association, 20, 603,1970.
10. Cantwell, E.  N.,  R. A. Hoffman, I. T. Rosenlund,
       and S. W. Ross, A Systems Approach to Vehicle
       Emission  Control, presented to the Society of
       Automotive  Engineers  National  Automobile
       Engineering Meeting,  Detroit,  Michigan,  Paper
       No. 720510, May 22-26,1972.
11. Cantwell, E.  N., A Total Exhaust Emission Control
       System,  presented at  the Joint Meeting of the
       Ontario  and  Quebec  Chapters  of the  Air
       Pollution  Control  Association,  Montebello,
       Quebec, September 20-22,1970.

-------
             TRACE  ELEMENT  EMISSIONS FROM  THE
                     COMBUSTION  OF  FOSSIL FUELS
                                          J. R. FANCHER
                                     Commonwealth Edison Co.
                                          Chicago, Illinois
THE CONCERNS AND THEIR ORIGINS
  Over the last several years there has been a growing
interest in the redistribution, driven or aided by human
actions, of certain elements which are ordinarily referred
to as trace  elements. The meaning  of  the  term itself
varies conspicuously with the investigator; that being the
case, it seems appropriate that this paper contain at the
outset a specification of what is meant by that term
when used here. I have taken the liberty of defining
trace elements to exclude:
1. All of the  elements which are gasses at ordinary
  temperatures and pressures;
2. Nearly all of the elements of  generally high crustal
  abundance,  such as sodium, potassium, magnesium,
  aluminum, calcium, phosphorus, sulfur, silicon, and
  iron. Arguments  can be advanced  for retaining some
  of these  in the trace  elements category, example,
  because some are trace in a dietary sense, or simply
  because their  emissions from  a particular  class  of
  sources are generally small. However, these  ubiquitous
  contaminants confront humans and their activities in
  such a welter of ways that it is  unlikely that any
  particular  human activity  plays a dominant  role in
  that exposure;
3. Specific compounds or minerals, such as asbestos. It is
  fully recognized, however, that no assessment of the
  impact of any trace element should be made without
  knowledge as to  the form in which such  element is
  manifested;  the wide variation in toxicity  among the
  mercurials, and in particular the recent emergence of
  methyl mercury  as a  major toxic  agent,  are object
  lessons; and, finally,
4. Those  elements for  which the principal toxic effects
  are a  result of  their  radioactive  nature. This last
  exclusion  is  made simply in the name of limiting the
  subject matter of this paper; I am in no way denying
  that such  emissions exist nor  that  there may  be
  reasonable concern over their effects.
  Proceeding, then, from such an exclusionary definition
to the circumstances which have focussed attention on
the remaining trace elements, we find three major forces
have been at work:
1. Multivariate epidemiological studies have occasionally
   yielded positive correlations between clinical effects
   and atmospheric levels of one or more trace elements;
   whether  by chance, by joint association,  or  from
   genuine cause-effect relationships. Coupled with this,
   an increased interest has developed in the nutritional
   value of various trace elements.
2. Researchers in toxicology, concerned, perhaps justly,
   over the lack  of  toxicological corroboration of the
   presumed long-term, low-level effects  of major  air
   contaminants  such as  sulfur dioxide, have  quite
   naturally  returned  to  examination  of  known
   toxicants, especially the heavy metals.
3. A ground swell of public arousal, some of it probably
   carried  over from  frank poisoning cases involving
   either  water-borne  contamination or  ingestion  of
   lead-based  paints, has  resulted in regulatory activity
   and interest, especially as regards mercury and lead.
   Whether  or not such action is  well-advised, it has
   resulted in attempts at emission inventories which go
   well beyond those contaminants which have been the
   usual objects of suspicion.
  The present focus  on  trace element  emissions  is at
once  the result of  direct scientific experiment;  of
scientific  hunchmanship (which I do not derogate); and
of at least a modicum of public hue and cry, whether for
better or worse.

SOURCES OF TRACE ELEMENTS IN COMBUSTION
SYSTEMS
  As indicated earlier, this paper is concerned with a
class of emission sources  - combustion sources utilizing
fossil fuels  — and carries a special emphasis  on  large
sources such as electric utility  furnaces. The origins for
the trace elements emitted by such sources are obviously
to be found  chiefly in their fuels. Moreover, of the  three
                                                 109

-------
110
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
       TAB LEI  TRACE ELEMENTS IN OILS
Element
Beryllium
Boron
Scandium
Titanium
Vanadium
Chromium
Manganese
Cobalt
Nickel
Copper
Zinc
Gallium
Germanium
Arsenic
Selenium
Strontium
Yttrium
Molybdenum
Cadmium
Tin
Barium
Mercury
Lead
Concentration - ppm
.0004
.002
.001
.1
50.
.3
.1
.2
10.
.14
.25
.01
.001
.01
.17
.1
.001
10.
.01
.01
.1
10.
.3
       Note: These data sometimes represent only a
            single field, and therefore may be either
            anomalously high or low.

chief fossil fuel resources,  one, natural gas, appears  to
have  no  consequential  content  of trace  elements.  I
hasten to add  that natural gas is in increasingly short
supply, most  especially as a utility  fuel,  so  that its
desirable  characteristics  are essentially unavailable  for
control  purposes.  Our  discussion  must therefore
continue  to  examine  the remaining fuels, namely,
petroleum fractions and  coal.
Oils
  Most utility fuels, like the fuels used for space heating
in  small-to-medium-sized residential,  commercial, and
industrial furnaces,  fall  into  the  classifications  of
distillate oils, grade numbers 1 and 2, and residual oils,
grade numbers  5  and 6. A limited amount of crude oil is
also burned without refinement, and the future may see
increased  use of  intermediate  oils, about number 4, or
blends, and perhaps of  some fractions  beyond residual,
for example, tars or pitch.  There are few published data
concerning trace  element contents of  these various oil
fractions.  It is reasonable to conclude that the distillate
oils are probably  lower in most trace elements than their
respective crudes, while residuals may well be higher.
Table  1  gives the  concentration ranges  for  various
elements in  oil in ppm, as listed by various authors. With
the paucity  of data available, it cannot be assumed that
any of these figures are really representative of common
fuels.
  One  factor  which  should  not  be  overlooked  in
analyzing the impact  of oil fuels is the  addition  of
additives to improve combustion and/or ash collection.
For  example, particularly   with high-vanadium  oils,
additives  containing  manganese  are  frequently
incorporated  in  the  fuel as  a  means of improving
particulate emission control and stack appearance.
Coals
  Coals  are  an  almost  classic mixture of  many
constituents. With  respect to trace elements, there is
simply no such animal as a representative coal, even for a
universe as  small as  a single mine.  Moreover, just  as
environmental pressures have forced many companies to
essentially  abandon coal  fuel,  only four  generating
stations in the East Coast region are not now committed

      TABLE 2  TRACE ELEMENTS IN COALS
Element
Beryllium
Boron
Scandium
Titanium
Vanadium
Chromium
Manganese
Cobalt
Nickel
Copper
Zinc
Gallium
Germanium
Arsenic
Selenium
Rubidium
Strontium
Yttrium
Molybdenum
Tin
Barium
Mercury
Lead
Concentration— ppm
3
75
5
500
25
10
50
5
15
15
50
7
5
5
3
100
500
10
5
2
500
.01 -.5
25
       Note:  These data represent only a few samples
             each, and therefore may be either
             anomalously high or low.

-------
                                                                    FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION
                                                  in
to oil fuel; many coal burning facilities have shifted, or
contemplate  a shift,  to coals quite different than those
intended in their design. The elemental content of these
newer fuels has not been well established. The literature
suggests the  range  of coal trace element  concentrations
which is shown in Table 2. It will be noted that not only
are the concentrations quite different from those for oil
fuel, but  indeed  a  quite  different  set of elements
predominate.

SINKS FOR TRACE ELEMENTS IN COMBUSTION
SYSTEMS
  The  above  data  for  oil  and  coal-fueled  power
generation consider  only the initial content of trace
elements in  the fuels used. Before it can  be ascertained
what actual  emissions  to  the  atmosphere  may result
from use of  these fuels, it is necessary to consider what
other routes  may be taken by an atom  of  a particular
element. Figure 1 is a  schematic  diagram of  a large
generating unit. Neglecting deposition of  trace elements
upon, or  their  combination with, the surfaces of the
boiler,  ducts, or stack, there are still two possible exits
for their release from the furnace. The first is collection
with the slag, or molten  fuel impurities; the second is
passage into  the ducts leading toward the  stack. The
possibility of significant attrition in the slag is very good,
particularly for  coal-fired furnaces; it is well established
 that  of the ash normally present in coals, at least 20
 percent and often as much as 80 percent, is retained as
 slag in modern furnaces. There is, therefore, a reasonable
 chance that trace elements will  be entrained in, or will
 combine with, such a slag flow  and will, therefore, be
 prevented from reaching an air emission site.
  The remaining releases ordinarily face a second barrier
 before  they may exit the plant. That barrier is in the
 form of pollution control equipment, a feature of most
 utility installations since the late 1920's. There are at
 least  four types of pollution control equipment in use or
 under  construction  for  utilities today:  Mechanical
 collectors;  electrostatic  precipitators; baghouses;  and
 scrubbers. All of these devices are aimed  principally at
 reducing  the emissions  of particulates; therefore, they
 are generally effective if the material to be collected is in
 a condensed or combined form as it passes through the
 control equipment. Each type of control equipment has
 its  own  characteristics,  which deserve some comment
individually.
Mechanical Collectors
  Mechanical  collection, known also as  cyclone  or
multiclone  collection  or  under various  other trade
names,  utilizes centrifugal separation  of particles from
the gas  streams  which  carry  them.  The  collection is
obviously dependent upon the size and density of the
                                                          POSITIONS  2,  3, 4, 5, 6,  7,  8,  9,
                                                                      10, 11,  12, 13,
                                                                  WATER TREATMENT
                                                                                                LAKE SIDE
                                                                                                  INTAKE
                                                                                                  LAKE SIDE
                                                                                                 DISCHARGE
                                        Figure 1. Unit 2—3 systems.

-------
112
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
particles.  Cyclones  have  been  popular  on  small
industrial-size boilers; for stoker firing, which produces a
high fraction  of large  particulate; and  for  oil firing.
Collection efficiencies in the range of 70 to 80 percent
are readily achieved; higher efficiencies are often claimed
and may be achieved on certain kinds of particulate, or
where  dust loadings  at the control equipment inlet are
extremely high. Changes in the type of fuel, even though
the apparent fuel parameters do not change, may alter
the collection  pattern  drastically; for  example, it is
reported that the Venezuelan-based residual oils are less
satisfactory  with such controls than the domestic and
Middle Eastern oils.
Electrostatic Pretipitators
  These devices have been the technology of choice for
many  years on  pulverized  coal-fired and cyclone-fired
boilers. Design  efficiencies range from about 88  to
beyond 99 percent. Some use of electrostatic collection
has also occurred for both residual and distillate oils. In
both mechanical and electrostatic  precipitators the gas
temperature in the control device is typically 250 to 350
F,  although a  new type  of  precipitator,  the hot
precipitator,  has  recently  been  introduced,  which
functions in ambient temperatures  of 800 to 1000 F. It
is ordinarily placed in the  gas stream ahead of the air
much more  efficient for large particles, but we have not
seen substantiation of that either in the literature nor in
our own experience.
Baghouses
  Bag  filters have been used experimentally on oil-fired
furnaces and  one  is  now  being constructed for a
medium-sized coal-fired  unit. Bag lifetime  is a difficult
operating  problem.  To my  knowledge,  no  one  has
run  tests  on  bag filter efficiency for these purposes;
it is  widely assumed  to  be very high.  Gas   temp-
peratures  must  be held above the dew pointto avoid
acid attack.
Scrubbers
  Some scrubbers have been built for particulate control
on coal and oil-fired units. Recently there has been an
upsurge in interest because of the potential for  sulfur
(and  perhaps  nitrogen) oxide removal.  It has been
hypothesized that scrubbers might also accumulate trace
elements such  as  mercury. Again, that has not been
established.

CASE STUDY: MERCURY
  Of the trace  elements, mercury  has received, by  far,
the most  attention.  As  a result of the obvious public
interest in  this contaminant,  Commonwealth Edison
engaged  Swanson  Environmental  Consultants, Inc.  of
Farmington. Michigan, to do  a mercury mass balance
analysis  on  our  State  Line  Generating  Station  in
Hammond,  Indiana.  This  study was completed during
January of 1971. As has been  reported for other similar
studies, it was not possible to achieve an accurate mass
balance,  probably due  to the very low concentrations
involved  and the particularly difficult determination of
the average level of mercury in the coal. Nonetheless, the
results are somewhat illuminating, as  shown in Table 3.
Stated simply, our conclusions are as follow: Essentially
all  the  mercury enters in the fuel itself; while some
concentration takes  place in slag and ash, the  loss of
mercury  to these sinks is negligible, and apparently most
of the mercury is emitted from the stack.


   TABLE 3 GENERAL RESULTS OF MERCURY
             BALANCE ON A COAL-FIRED
             GENERATING STATION
      Mercury input:
        Fuel
        Air, water, etc.
      Mercury output in:
        Slag
        Precipitated ash
        Unprecipitated ash
        Flue gas
        Water, etc.
     Apparent error in balance
 100  %
Negligible

   4.5%
   4.8%
    .1%
  78  %
Negligible
  87.4%
  12.6%
 100  %
       Analytical method for most measurements: Atomic
       Absorption.

  I hasten to add that mercury may not be, probably is
not, representative of other trace elements. For example,
the  boiling  point  of the elemental metal is 357 C or
about  685 F; a temperature that is easily possible within
the flue gas stream. Few other trace elements are in that
range.  Thus,  metallic  mercury  might  pass  through
electrostatic precipitators in vapor form, while any trace
elements  solidifying  might  be  trapped  by control
equipment. This is merely hypothesis at present; but its
application may have important consequences for future
control strategies.
IMPACT OF FUEL COMBUSTION EMISSIONS
  It would  be easy,  given  the  figures of my  previous
tables, to extend the  calculations to the number of
pounds of each element per day, per month, or per year
emitted by any one  source or combination of sources.
Some  authors have, in  fact, done exactly that. Such an
exercise  yields  heat  without  illumination; it is
reprehensible  for two reasons. The first, which I  have
already remarked, is the unknown chemical and physical
form of these emissions; essential to any understanding
of their biological significance. I must add that emissions
from large combustion sources, such as power generating

-------
                                                                  FOSSIL FUEL COMBUSTION
                                               113
facilities,  are apt  to  be  strongly  bound  inorganic
compounds,  mixtures, and  alloys. Organic compounds
are quite   unlikely  outcomes  of  such  oxidizing,
high-temperature, low-carbon environments. Conversely,
small-scale combustion  of fuels, incineration, heating,
and mobile  sources may result in reactive and complex
compounds.
  Secondly, the lessons  of air quality prediction learned
on other battlefields include the  pre-eminent role of
micrometeorological factors: source  stack height,  gas
flow,  gas temperature, particle size, and atmospheric
stability and wind  parameters. The large sources may
not, and probably do not, constitute the most  important
contributors to general ambient air quality. Failure to
consider these factors may  result in encouraging small,
reactive,  poorly  distributed  emission sources while
penalizing large, controllable ones.  I should not need to
belabor that lesson; the consequences of not learning it
could redound to  the detriment of millions of people.
RESEARCH NEEDED AND IN PROGRESS
  Obviously, one set of important facts not yet known is
the behavior of trace elements in  combustion systems.
How much  of element  E is captured in  the slag? How
much  in  precipitated fly ash? In  what chemical form
does element E  appear,  oxide, sulfide,  what? These
questions, and related ones, are the subject of a project
to begin shortly here  at Batelle-Columbus under the
sponsorship  of the  Edison Electric Institute; the  trade
association for the private electric utility industry.
  Another set of data which is of interest concerns the
transport and fate of  trace element  contaminants in
urban atmospheres. New York University is studying this
subject,  under  the  sponsorship  of  Edison  Electric
Institute  and the American Petroleum Institute. This
study  includes analysis of  deposition in human lung
tissue,  as well   as  study  of samples  of suspended
particulate from several New York City locations.
  Finally,   United  States  Environmental  Protection
Agency and various agencies  around the county have
programs in  the works  to determine the trace element
content  of  a variety of fuels, so that more accurate
assessmentof, at least, the fuel combustion input can be
made.
CONCLUSIONS
  A variety  of kinds  of data are thus  accumulating
toward knowledge of the movements of trace elements,
with and without the assistance of man. The facts as of
this date are these:
1. Trace  element emissions  from combustion systems
  cannot yet be readily quantified.
2. The  effects  of  current  levels  of  airborne trace
  elements  on health and welfare are not yet known,
  but  there  is little reliable  evidence  of  critical
  association and essentially none of causation.
3. Our mandate, therefore, is to seek knowledge about
  effects, mechanisms, emission sources, and controls,
  so  that  intelligent  and objective decisions can  be
  made. Emotion is to be eschewed: An attack on an
  unknown enemy may  exact a  dear price  without
  commensurate gain.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
l.Bertine,  K. K.  and  E. D.  Goldberg,  Fossil Fuel
     Combustion  and  the Major Sedimentary  Cycle,
     Science 173, pp. 233-235, July 16,1971.
2. Joensuu, 0. I., Fossil Fuels as a Source of Mercury
     Pollution, Science  172, pp. 1027-1028, June 4,
     1971.
3. Billings, C. E. and W. R. Matson, Mercury Emissions
     From  Coal  Combustion,   Science  176,  pp.
     1232-1233, June 16,1972.
4. Ruch, R. R.,  H. J.  Gluskoter, and E. J. Kennedy,
     Mercury Content of Illinois Coals, Environmental
     Geology Note Number 43, Illinois State Geological
     Survey, Urbana, Illinois, February 1971.
5. Hammon, A. L., Mercury in the Environment, Natural
     and Human Factors, Science  171,  pp.  788—789,
     February 26,1971.
6. Bailey, E.  H, P. D.  Snavely, Jr., and D.  E.  White,
     Chemical Analysis of Brines and Crude Oil, Cymric
     Field, Kern County, California, Short Papers in the
     Geologic and Hydrologic  Sciences, 398, USGS, pp.
     D306-D309.
7. Mercury   Emission  Study,  State  Line  Generating
     Station, Unpublished  report for Commonwealth
     Edison Company  by  Swanson  Environmental
     Consultants, Inc., 1971.
8. Mitsch, W.  J., The  Significance of Mercury  in  the
     Atmosphere,  Unpublished  paper,  Florida
     University, November 24,1971.

-------
LUNCHEON ADDRESS
               Martin Lang
               Commissioner of Water Resources

-------
                                LUNCHEON  ADDRESS
                                            MARTIN LANG
                                   Commissioner of Water Resources
                                      City of New York, New York
  As a career civil  servant, I've spent some 30 years in
the city. I admit that some of those years have been very
odd; but you know, here in the heartland or America I
have detected the presence of a kind of urbanphobia, or
an irrational fear that is triggered whenever New York
City is mentioned. Really,  New York is  no  different
from Columbus or Cincinnati or Chicago. It's just that in
the pressure cooker of that city, things tend to happen
sooner,  and perhaps to a  more intense degree,  than
anywhere else. Actually, what happens in New York is
just  a portent of things to  come in all the  other
megalopolitan  areas across the country. But today I'd
like to point out that in one  area at  least — the area of
water pollution control — I think that New York City
stands ahead of all  other coastal cities in the world, and
ahead of many inland cities as well.
  A statement like  that may  surprise many of you, but
let me take a few moments to tell you a little about the
Department  of Water Resources and our  commitment
to impounding, protecting, and distributing  to  every
citizen of the city (and to  some of  the  surrounding
counties, too) an ample supply of the best potable water
in the world.  I  am  charged with  gathering up  that
slightly used water  supply, conveying it away  from the
people's doorsteps,  and treating and discharging it to the
peripheral waters of the city in such  a way as to keep it
innocuous.  Now that means that  my department is
responsible for  the  construction,  operation,  and
maintenance of all water supply facilities. We are also in
charge of  the  design,  construction,  operation,  and
maintenance of  all water pollution control  facilities
(including  the  interceptors  and a fleet of five ocean
going  sludge vessels); and the design, construction, and
maintenance of all  the sewers in the city. I have 6,000
miles of water mains (some of them well over 100 years
old) and 6,000 miles of sewers. Sometimes I  feel  that
each mile is  draped like an albatross around my neck.
But I feel fortunate to be in a city that as early as 1920
began to put their money where their convictions were.
And I feel fortunate to be in a city where the present
mayor is a real champion of the urban environment and
has put his money where  his convictions are in that
respect.
  In New York City there are various kinds of budgets.
There is the capital budget, the expense budget, and the
work performance budget.  Then, following the Federal
lead,  we are trying to introduce something  called the
Program  Planning  Budget.  The value of this  system is
that it makes you define what  you're doing in terms of
your  actual  mission.  My mission in water  pollution
control is not specifically  to treat sewage. No, my
mission  is  to  protect  and  enhance  the marine
environment;  to  protect  and  enhance the  receiving
waters. When you look at it  that way, your attitude
toward everything changes. To me, the important issue is
no  longer the development of technical minutiae that
you can control. All  our sophisticated techniques for
removing metals — sulfide precipitation, reverse osmosis,
electrophoresis, electrodialysis, etc. — are useless if we
can't  face up to the real issue of how to dispose of the
end product. Now that I have this sludge, now that I've
dried it, now that I have  it as a hydroxide slurry,  what
do  I do with it? That's a little  tougher.  I could go on at
great  length and tell you all about the activated sludge
process and some of the innovations we have made in it.
I could tell  you  all  about mixed sludge thickening,
interstage  elutriation, high  rate  digestion, and all the
various modifications  of the activated sludge  process in
which my department has  had some innovative input.
But that would be evading the  real issue, which is  what
happens in the receiving waters. The payoff in all our
efforts is what actually happens in the environment. The
environment  doesn't know percentage  removal. Every
drop  of water in our bay and harbors only knows its
immediate microenvironment  and the  load  on  it. It
knows nothing about percent BOD removal.
  Until that day  when  we can  take the  wastes  of
mankind to where the tectonic plates override the ocean
deeps and reincorporate  them into the magma of the
earth, we have only three options for waste disposal. The
three  ultimate  dumps for  everything are the air, the
water, and the land. You all saw a chart  this morning
                                                   115

-------
116
CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
that neatly channeled waste in four directions. The end
products in this case all got off the flow chart, but they
are still part of the environment, and we must consider
the total impact they will have on that environment.
  I am a practicing ecologist and environmentalist, and I
say that with all due modesty. You have attended many
environmental conferences, and many  of you have read
about the fragile ecosystems of the tundra, the savannah,
the rain forest, the estuary, and the desert. We  are all
concerned about the buildup of DDT in the body fat of
the Antarctic penguin,  the extinction of the blue  whale,
the necessity of preserving the California condor, and
the fragility of the eggs of the peregrine falcon because
of pesticide  buildups.  I believe  in all that  and  I've
worked to abate these blights on our environment. More
particularly  I  am  concerned  about  another  fragile
ecosystem — the urban ecosystem, where eight million
agitated people are penned up in 300 square miles of
land.  I am charged with the two  precious life support
systems  for  this fragile urban ecosystem:  the  water
supply and the used water supply.
  In the area of ecology there are many self-appointed
and self-anointed prophets of doom who say the sky is
falling. Their favorite term is "irreversible damage." I am
pleased now to give you some report on this with respect
to New York City  and  to give you some supporting data
for the statement  I made earlier that New York  stands
ahead of all other coastal cities in the world in the area
of water pollution control.
  New York City is fortunate to have base line data on a
harbor survey going back to 1909. It's too bad we don't
have such similar data for all our waters. We don't know
what  the lead was along the highways in 1910 or what
the  mercury  content  of   fish  was.  You  know,
environmental base line data are very important because
they sometimes enable  us to discern between long-term,
natural, cyclical changes and manmade changes  in the
environment. But  at least in our harbor we  have that
data  and it shows the degradation of our estuary  waters
in the years between 1912 and 1917.
  And then something happened in the City of New
York that maligned city that always invokes a little
snicker. The people of the City of New York started to
put their money where their  convictions were.  In the
1920's  the City began to build a series of secondary
treatment plant;  - on salt water mind you, not on a
potable water shed, not on inland fresh water, but on a
tidal  salt water estuary.  And they  did it  during the
depression. Interrupted by World War II, they plowed
anead. At present  they are treating 1.1 billion gallons a
day of our waste water supply by secondary treatment.
We still have some raw discharges, but 1 have initiated a
SI.5 billion program for the upgrading and expansion of
all of our plants and the creation of two huge new super
plants in the city,  one  of which (the North  River Plant)
is under construction today. The avowed intent  is  that
by the end  of this decade we will treat  all the dry
                                           weather waste water  flow of the  City of New York to
                                           +90  percent BOD  and suspended solids removal.
                                           Incidentally, New York City has addressed itself to what
                                           might seem to some  of you a very quixotic enterprise
                                           (but I assure you that it is not). In the latter half of the
                                           20th  century  we're  going to restore bathing beaches
                                           already abandoned and create new bathing beaches in
                                           the heart of megalopolis in Jamaica Bay. I have the first
                                           such  prototype plant on stream right now in Jamaica
                                           Bay,  the  Spring Creek  Plant, which is designed to take
                                           care of the combined overflows that are a problem for
                                           many of the coastal cities.
                                             Now  with  all  this   kind  of   activity,  we're  not
                                           complacent at all. The people of the city have a right to
                                           ask what we are getting for all our efforts. By that very
                                           sensitive parameter of dissolved oxygen (DO), New York
                                           City  can  show that today, in 1972, we have raised the
                                           dissolved oxygen level to a point not seen since the early
                                           years of this  century. I repeat, we have dragged up the
                                           DO of all the major branches of the harbor to a level not
                                           seen  since about 1910  or 1912. And we're  doing that
                                           while carrying on our backs, so to speak, the discharge
                                           from  our neighboring  state, New Jersey.
                                             Those of you  who are familiar  with New York can
                                           remember the best nickel's work in the city — a ride on
                                           the Staten Island Ferry. It was a cheap date to take a girl
                                           for a ride from the Battery  to Staten Island along the
                                           upper bay there, to stand up on the bow and say "Oh,
                                           what  salt spray." You were going through the dispersion
                                           field  of the Passaic Valley, which disperses slightly less
                                           than  300 million gallons of sewage a day — sewage that
                                           is twice the strength  of New York City sewage and not
                                           disinfected.  But remember  what I said:  the marine
                                           environment  only knows the load. It doesn't  know
                                           percentage removal. It doesn't know what is being taken
                                           out; it  only knows what is being added to  it. Now that
                                           we can see this, there is some light on the horizon. And
                                           now that New Jersey is beginning to follow our example,
                                           I can assure you that our inshore estuarine waters will
                                           come to a level within  the next decade and a half not
                                           seen in the memory of living man.
                                             So,  while  all the prophets of disaster are just talking,
                                           some  of the engineers  are doing something about it. You
                                           know,  you're  not  going  to  do anything  to the
                                           environment with rhetoric. You're  going to do it with
                                           plans, with engineering, and with hardware. You're going
                                           to do it with trained  men and designs. Mere talk is not
                                           going  to do anything; we've gone past the talking stage.
                                             Now  this  brings me  to metals. New York City's
                                           program was based on the digestion of sludge  and the
                                           marine  disposal of that sludge at  the approved  point
                                           offshore  under  permit  approval of  the  Corps of
                                           Engineers. In 1957, I  was the first organizer. I wrote the
                                           industrial waste regulations of the City of New  York,
                                           and I  saw them through until they became law and until
                                           we set up an  industrial  waste section (which has been
                                           growing ever  since).  This  industrial waste control was

-------
                                                                         LUNCHEON ADDRESS
                                                 117
divided into two parts. First, the city levied a surcharge
to cover  a proportionate share of the  extra cost of
treating  approved  wastes of high  strengths. Second,
certain   wastes   - toxic,  dangerous,  inflammable,
explosive,  or  obstructive material — were  prohibited
from the city sewers. And of course, metals and cyanide
and oils figured in that.
  At this point I would like to say that we should not be
so parochial as to sit here with blinders on and address
ourselves  only  to  trace  metals. When you talk about
environmental  impact  you  should  also consider the
refractory  organic  compounds, which may have very
insidious effects or may have synergistic effects because
of organometallic compounds. However, we did organize
and implement this  program, and  we  were the first
coastal city to do so.
  As a reward  for all our diligence, we found ourselves
summoned  by  the  United  States  Environmental
Protection  Agency  and by  some  zealous Federal
attorneys only a few months ago to appear before the
bar of justice and  account for our dilatory inaction. The
thesis of the Federal attorney was that I  must be  some
kind of  shambling Neanderthal  who needed to  be
dragged into the 20th century. Didn't  I know about the
effects of mercury and cadmium? Didn't I  know?
  Yes, I do know. I have been in close association with
Dr. Michitaka Kaino  of Tokyo who fought the famous
Minimata case. Just a year ago I stood on the streets of
Osaka, Japan,  carrying  a picket sign along with the
students to protest the cadmium discharges that led to
the Itai Itai disease. The Federal attorneys wanted me to
be aware of the impact  of metals, and they wanted our
requirements regarding  them to be even  more rigorous
than the Federal Government's. I am a very pragmatic
person. Life is not that  simple. I have appealed publicly
and I am  doing so now; but now I know the Federal
Government is going to  act. For years  we have  been
saying, let the Federal  Government set  standards for
toxic materials throughout the country on an equitable
basis and rational basis. We will rigorously enforce  them
for the wet industries in New York City. I don't  want
them to be able to move 2 miles away across the Hudson
River and take refuge there. There should  be no place to
hide. These standards should be leveled across the board.
The new law for which Congress overrode the President's
veto calls for just such promulgations of standards, and
we're eagerly awaiting them.
  Meanwhile, we have moved vigorously. At  a time of
austerity  in  the  city,  Mayor  Lindsay  gave  me  an
additional  staff, an additional special task force of one
ot my industrial waste sections of 15 people  with the
vehicles and  the  laboratory  support and the ancillary
clerical support  —  just  to  concentrate on intensive
policing  of metals discharges. Now being  an engineer,  I
am enamored  of numbers. Much of the talk about this
problem has involved emotion and hysteria rather than
real figures.
  For  example, the  specter  has  been raised that by
marine  sludge  disposal  we  are creating a  dead  sea
offshore, and that this dead sea was discharging a terrific
concentration of metals. If you look at the real figures
you will find that  dredge spoils and construction debris
were actually contributing  more metals than the sludge.
You would also  find  that the ambient waters in and
around  New York City had  metals concentrations that
were  lower than  those  for  the United  States Public
Health  Service  drinking  water standards. It is very
significant  that  the  sludge  itself is highly  visible.
Well-digested sludge  is a black, tarry fluid -  a viscous
fluid.  It's much  more  highly  visible  than  the
well-dispersed effluents in  the  inshore receiving waters.
But one discharge from New Jersey, in our Upper Bay,
right within spitting distance  of downtown Manhattan,
has six and one-half  times as  much  BOD as all the BOD
of our sludge discharged offshore and with tenfold more
metals right inshore. I  think it was a reasonable, rational
judgment  to move the discharge offshore and protect the
precious  inshore  estuarine  environment. That's  the
classical spawning ground of the marine biota. That's the
area through which the anadromous  fish move as they go
up  the Hudson. I think that judgment is paying  off for
us in the  restoration of our  inshore estuarine precious
dissolved  oxygen. In studying the metals, however, I
wanted to know the actual mass balance of the metals,
the quantitative movement.
  There was some  simplistic  reasoning:  just nail the
electroplaters and you have  solved the problem. New
York City is not a big wet industry town, but we have
about 200 electroplaters. We  have sampled every one of
them. When I say samples  I don't mean grab  samples; I
mean around-the-clock samples, seasonal sampling to go
through all the cyclic  and  seasonal changes. We have a
pretty good fix on their discharges. But I  wanted to go
one step  further.  I  do a lot of other industrial waste
analyses, and I have  now started a new procedure..If my
men are  analyzing fat rendering plants,  fish smoking
plants, or  textile processing plants, they also do analyses
for metals to get an idea of the total metal output of all
industries  and not just those classically associated with
metals. I have also prepared charts showing the hierarchy
of metals  of various big cities in the United States. There
is one that really interests me, and that is Grand Rapids,
Michigan.  It stands head and shoulders above everybody
else.
  I am trying to get figures on the metals problem so we
can make  rational decisions  where to concentrate our
efforts.  We have  nailed the  electroplaters right  now.
Currently  I have in my hand  about  80 stipulations from
the electroplaters that are  being implemented; the rest
are being  summoned, many each week. We are going to
bring them into line, and it has already had a  profound
effect.
  However, when you look  at all the sources of metals in
megalopolis (and I have a very good way of finding them

-------
118
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
  1 just checked  the effluent to my treatment plants)
you find some very interesting things. I'd like to nail the
culprit,  for example, who  puts in one-fifth of all the
copper coming out of New York City. By now you don't
want to hear that trite cliche from Pogo, "We met the
enemy and he's us." You've heard that. But I met the
enemy;  it was me.  I account for  22 percent of the
copper in  the  water supply (and hence the sewage) by
the  copper sulfate that I add in the upstate reservoirs for
algae control, and I will continue to do so. I find there is
also a measurable amount of zinc in the water supply.
You say it isn't much, but we do consume 1.35 billion
gallons of water each day in New York City. So if you
want  to express  it in terms of pounds, it would  be
substantial - as much as 350 pounds of copper.
  I  proceeded  to look even  further for sources of metal
around our city. I am familial with the lead emissions —
you  know,  with all  that  lead  that's  emitted and
solubilized and that Dr. Jacobs hasn't taken care of yet.
Where  does it  go? It is eventually flushed along into a
catch basin, into  the  sewer, and  into  our treatment
plant. Eventually  some of  it that's  not  precipitated  is
going to go out into the receiving waters. They don't
have to worry about  the stack emissions. Dr. Francis
says don't worry, it's  10  ppb not ppm (you know
mercury).  But  all  of this is going to get caught by the
rainfall and all of it's going to wind up in the receiving
waters.
  Then I thought of something else. If you look around
the city, whether it's New York City or Columbus, Ohio,
you will see some corroding car bodies. You look  at
some galvanized fences and you say that the  galvanizing
looks a little  gray now.  What happened to the  zinc?
Where did it go? It's been solubilized. Where's it going to
wind  up?  It didn't evaporate. It's going to wind up right
down  in  the  sewer and  eventually in the  sewage
treatment plant and in our receiving waters. I tried  to
explain this once to a Corporation Counsel of the City
of  New  York   — you  know,  a   very  conservative
individual, a  former Solicitor General  of  the United
States.  I  was  trying to tell him  about the  amphoteric
nature  of zinc and  particularly  aluminum.  I  tried  to
explain what  an  amphoteric metal was, but I wasn't
getting  through. I tried to  point out how these things
always  wind  up  in  the  sewers.  "You  know,  Mr.
Counselor." I  said, "it's  kind  of a  gay  metal that can
swing either way." And someone brought the story back
to Mayor  Lindsay that I was affronting the dignity of his
Corporation Counsel. But since he had  to take care  of
the Times Square phenomena, I figured he knew what I
was talking about. So you see the galvanizing metals and
the corroding facades.
  Then I looked at an Assistant Federal  Attorney from
the Southern  District of New York and said to him,
"You sir  are  a polluter  and you are a  contributor  of
metals."  He   replied, "I don't  run an  electroplating
plant." "Mr. Attorney."  I said, "do you own your own
home?"  He replied, "Yes." I asked, "Alter a while, do
you find that you ever have to replace the faucets? Do
you find that the sink strainer gets a little corroded after
a  few years?"  He said, "Yeah, yeah." I then asked,
"What do you  think happened to that corrosion? Do
you ever polish  anything in your workshop basement?"
He answered, "Oh sure, I'm very handy." I said, "What
do you think happened to that metal you abraded? Do
you ever use any compounds that  contain metallic salts
you know? Do you know what's in a pharmaceutical
compound  or  medicines you use?"  You  know, just
broken thermometers alone going down the sewers from
some bathroom can account for substantial amounts of
mercury.
  I began to get an idea that sheer residential areas -
just people  — most of themselves  generate metals. So I
sent my  industrial waste team out to different areas of
the city.  I knew the industrial areas; I was sampling their
wastes. So I sampled areas of one- and two-family homes
and modest apartment houses. I went to a big, purely
housing  complex like  Co-op City in the Bronx, and I
sampled that. And do you know  what I am beginning to
find out? I'm going to publish this within a year or so
because I keep accumulating data, but I am pleased  to
tell you now that just like  Pogo  says, "You and I are in
this too, you know."
  Without letting up in our relentless  quest to get the
wet industries to conform, let us just address  ourselves
to what sheer metropolitan living does. Purely residential
areas, and these are just round figures, account for about
33  percent of the copper,  38 percent of the nickel, 23
percent of the  zinc, and 57 percent of the cadmium in
New York City. Now that may differ in other industrial
areas, because New York  City  is  neither a big heavy
industry  town,  nor  a  big wet  industry town. In the
classic small town situation, one big plant dominates the
town — one big  wet industry whose population is larger
than that of the entire town.
  These  figures  will change. But  since this country is
increasingly urbanized,  and  since these urbs  become
"slurbs"  and  suburbs  and  then  coalesce   irsto
megalopolises, we should address ourselves to the sheer
output of domestic residential living. I  invite you to do
so at your next symposium, when we talk about what
comes out of the automobile and the strip mines (there
are no strip mines in New York, to my intense regret; it
would solve one tremendous problem  of solid waste if
there were). When you talk about  the sources of metals
in our environment, I invite you to consider the source
of  pure  people, and their daily activities. We're  great
consumers. We are consumers of goods, we are abraders
and corroders and users of goods that eventually become
soluble metals.
  I have been analyzing the metals in the sludge, and I've
been  talking with the  President's  Advisory  Committee
and with CEQ about  it.  But the truth is that sludge
disposal  is just  another aspect of  solid waste disposal.

-------
                                                                         LUNCHEON ADDRESS
                                                 119
Anyone here who has a viable solution to the solid waste
disposal  of any  major metropolis has  also created a
viable solution for the sludge, because the sludge can be
merely a  top  dressing that can ride piggyback on the
solid waste. New York City generates up to 30,000 tons
a day of refuse, and you know, we're pretty good; we
know how  to pick it  up. But  when you pick it up,
you've got to set it down somewhere. Everybody wants
you to pick it up; nobody wants you to set it down. You
all  read  the  environmental  journals.  Aren't   you
enamored of returning the organics to the soil?
  We're trying desperately to do something. I have used
every cubic foot of digested sludge that  I could put on
completed sanitary landfills to create park area. We've
got  a beautiful golf course in New York City created on
completed,  compacted fill and  digested sludge (which
acts as a synthetic humus, like a topsoil binder). It's not
a complete topsoil, and it's not a complete fertilizer; but
it can create synthetic topsoil. Nevertheless, we still have
the  problem of where to set it  down. We don't have strip
mines, we  don't have barren  lands, and we  don't have
any big arroyos or gulches or deserts. We are appealing
to the Federal Government: the solution for solid waste
disposal  transcends narrow political and  geographical
boundaries. The Federal presence must be felt. We  can't
go to Chicago as a solution, where there is a man who
very complacently says he has solved that problem. He
bought  14,000  acres  200  miles from Chicago.  It's
costing him about $100  per  ton (it cost  me  $12 per
ton). He is willing to pay the  price; the only thing is, he
needs another 50 or 60 thousand acres. If we were to use
the  Chicago  technique,  I'd  take a   good  part  of
southeastern New York  State and make it  our dump
area. And we are talking about sludge only, here.
  So obviously the Federal presence must be felt. When
the  environmentalists ask if you don't want to return the
organics  to land, my answer is yes, but give me the  land.
And when we  do return the organics to the land, do you
know what the Federal EPA says? They say, "Hey wait a
minute, fellow. What about  that metal burden in there?
It's  going to leach out, and  then what are you  going to
do?" Irreversible economic ecological damage. We are
back to that again; we just toss it from one hand to the
other.  The  options are very limited, and probably the
most effective thing  to  do is to get the  metals  at the
source before they get in. After all, sewage is just slightly
used water; that's all it is. The average strength in New
York City's sewage is 150 ppm of suspended solids and
BOD.  That  means you've  got  to work on a million
pounds to handle  150 pounds of solids. And if you get
the  metals  concentration  down in  a  fractional ppm
range,  you'll have to work  on hundreds of millions of
pounds to work on a  fraction of a pound of cadmium or
zinc or hexavalent chromium. Therefore, it's easier  to
get it at the  source.
  I am just going to leave this one thought with  you. It's
almost presumptuous of me to talk about metals to this
vast array of talent here and  to  tell you  these obvious
truisms. But each of you interact with a Federal agency;
some of you are a part of a Federal or State agency. My
appeal to  you is this: that decisions should be made on
rational numbers, not on that  nice round figure of zero.
Because, you know, that's just a nice goal. Consideration
should be given to the normal ambient level of metals in
receiving  waters.  Somebody  just  mentioned  a  word
about  vanadium; but  I remember reading about  10 years
ago  in the Scientific  American that vanadium  plays an
important part in the life  cycle of sea  salps. We know
that there  are normal  metal  concentrations in the
ambient waters. Our effluent standard should be geared
to some rationale, with full knowledge that there may be
synergistic effects, with full knowledge that discharge
into estuarine waters may permit shellfish to concentrate
metals.

  I  have  touched a number of bases,  but I want to
emphasize two things. First, there are many inputs to
our environment besides  strip mines, electroplaters, and
wet  industries. One such input is  sheer  metropolitan
living itself.  Second, I think we should be in an intense
data gathering situation now to determine the base line
data of our environment  of metals. In that way, we can
make judgments on the basis of real figures rather than
on hysterical emotion.

-------
             SESSION IV
MONITORING FOR TRACE METALS IN
        THE ENVIRONMENT
                      Chairman:
                      R. Rabin
                      National Science Foundation

-------
                            MONITORING  SESSION  -
                   CHAIRMAN'S OPENING REMARKS
                                              R. RABIN
                                    National Science Foundation
                                          Washington, D.  C.
  Concern for  the  health of  man and his global
life-support  system has spawned an era of ecological
logorrhea, the nucleus of which is the term pollution.
However  confusing and inconclusive  the  debate,
collective public opinion on pollution is easily formed
when  the senses  are  directly  affected.  And  when
pollutant  concentrations  are  sufficiently  high and
resultant  damaging effects are readily  perceived,  the
impacted population  may  obtain redress  given  the
motivation and needed legal instruments. Of course, this
represents an extreme; the  tip of the pollution iceberg.
  In the present social climate, which encourages a more
thorough and scholarly assessment  of man's  activities
and their environmental consequences, we face  new
realities. These relate to the  quintessential and vexing
question of how one scientifically and legally defines a
pollutant or contaminant. Although other considerations
subserve this question, they too must be examined. For
examples:
  A.  Very often the  substance is  only  detectable  in
trace concentrations, i.e. at levels of micrograms or less
per gram or per liter. Analytical methods to separate the
contaminant  from  complex mixtures,  identify  and
measure it are  time  consuming and expensive. Even
state-of-the-art methods may be relatively insensitive or
inaccurate, and rely on trouble-prone instrumentation.
There  may be inadequate standard  reference materials
against  which  the  suitability  of  a  method  can be
calibrated. Improper  sampling and sample handling and
storage  may introduce substantial errors into the  data
output.
  B.  In natural  habitats the toxicity of a contaminant
may be expressed so subtly  that months, possibly years,
may elapse before ecological perturbations are evident.
Thus, the consequences of threshold effects are no less
important to  the population ecologist than they are to
the biochemist or toxicologist. They eventually relate to
the elasticity of biotic communities, i.e. their ability to
withstand irreparable harm from assault on their most
sensitive  members.  Spatial  considerations  in the
contaminant-target relationship also complicate matters
since accumulation  and toxicity may be perceived far
downstream or downwind from the point of release.
  C.   The  cause  and  effect association  between
compound and target apparent in the field may originate
with a parent compound whose structure and properties
have  changed  during  transport.  The evolution of
peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN) in smog by photolysis, and
the methylation of inorganic mercurials are well-known
examples. In both cases the end products are more toxic
than  their progenitors.  We recognize with increasing
clarity and frequency that  knowing only the value for
total mercury or cadmium (or whatever element) is not
enough; quantifying the biologically active form may be
essential.
  D.  Transport  processes  themselves are  imposingly
complex.  Much  of  the tetraethyl lead in gasoline, for
example, is   emitted   in  auto  exhaust  as  lead
chlorobromide in a population  of particulates varying
from a micron or less to those much larger in size. Larger
particles  settle quickly along the roadside  in suburban
and rural areas. Soil cores, vegetation, and rodents show
concentrations of lead diminishing from up to  1000
parts per million (ppm) at  the source to a background
level of about 20 ppm at a distance of 50 to 100 meters.
Collectively, data  indicate  that  man's  best  natural
protection against rurally vented lead is soil, which in its
capacity  as a  vast ion  exchange  resin, tenaciously
chelates the metal under common conditions. But the
fine  (submicron) particulates  are  subject  to  myriad
meteorological  and  climatic  variables which have
prevented easy development of satisfactory air transport
models from line source pollution. In urban areas, where
such  information  is  so badly  needed, and the
soil-to-concrete  ratio is much smaller, the movement
patterns  of  lead are largely unknown. Street dust  is
suspected to be  an important reservoir for atmospheric
                                                 121

-------
122
CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
reinjection  and for storm drain-carried lead. From the
latter,  lead  may  be partitioned  between  sludge after
sewage treatment, and rivers and streams in both soluble
and sediment bound states. Zoologists at  the University
of  Illinois have  shown that  bloodworms inhabiting
sediments near the  water-sediment  interface are avid
concentrators  of the  metal perhaps  constituting an
important link in lead transport in aquatic food chains.
Aquatic biologists  at the University  of Missouri, Rolla,
and the University of Colorado  have  found that algae in
streams receiving  effluents from metals  mining and
milling operations concentrate trace metals in the range
of hundreds to thousands of ppm.
  E.  The signal-to-noise ratio in engineering parlance is
also  applicable to  the  study of trace contamination.
Unless background levels contributed by volcanism, rock
weathering, soil  formation and breakdown, and  other
natural processes are accounted for, the  importance of
some  human  contributions  may  be overemphasized.
While  the  environmental  release  of cadmium seems
almost entirely  man's  doing,  perhaps more  than 50
percent of circulating global mercury is a consequence of
a complex natural cycle. Geographical medicine is a field
of study which relates natural excesses and deficiencies
of elements to human and animal diseases. Its potential
to contribute insights to  the signal-to-noise enigma could
be more fully utilized.
  F.  The scientific aspects alone  of metal contaminant
research problems require expertise in many disciplines.
The  research  team   approach,  beside   demanding
individual scholarship,  needs dynamic management. In
the university milieu the  traditional disciplinary and
departmental organization  may impair  the formation
and function of interdisciplinary  amalgams. That they
do  exist and  are  performing  productively, however,
severely tests  the  pessimists' hasty  generalizations of
several years ago. Perhaps  even more important is  the
fact that  universities haven't found it necessary to scrap
and rebuild their structures to accomplish this.
  The  principal concerns of the  scientific  community
are, as I see them:
                                            1. Determining the levels of potentially or overtly toxic
                                              substances in the environment;
                                            2. Assessing the  effects of these levels on man, animal,
                                              and plant communities;
                                            3. Relating these findings to methods of control.
                                              To  address  these  concerns  I  recognize  research
                                            opportunities in that:
                                            1. Toxic  or hazardous substances  must  be separated
                                              from complex mixtures, identified and measured, or
                                              analyzed in situ;
                                            2. The  movement  of contaminants and their  rates  of
                                              flow through environmental  media must be traced
                                              from their sources to ultimate deposition sites;
                                            3. Target  organisms along, and at the end of, the routes
                                              of flow and their sensitivity to noxious agents must be
                                              determined;
                                            4. The  complex  relationships  between   biotic
                                              communities   and  the  effects  of  the biologically
                                              available toxicants must be understood;
                                            5. Research  results should suggest improved monitoring
                                              systems  and, when  warranted,  ultimately  aid in
                                              devising technological, legal, and economic abatement
                                              or control measures.
                                              When  considering  which  contaminants  merit our
                                            attention, I  suggest  that  we contemplate the following
                                            aspects:
                                            1. Intrinsic biological risk;
                                            2. Geographical dispersion;
                                            3. Quantity and persistence in the environment;
                                            4. A  presumptive tendency to accumulate in the food
                                              sources of man and other biota; and
                                            5. Difficulty of avoidance based on extant use patterns
                                              and current technology.
                                              Research  and  monitoring is  anchored  in analytical
                                            methodology.  The  perception  and  measurement of
                                            contaminants  in  biota  and  environmental  media,
                                            particularly  in trace concentrations, form the common
                                            denominator relating  levels,  effects,  and efficacy of
                                            instituted controls.  Analysis  in  no less critical to the
                                            researcher than  to the monitor, standard setter, polluter
                                            or inforcer.

-------
          MONITORING FOR  TRACE  METALS  IN  THE
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT: PROBLEMS AND  NEEDS
                                         P. R. HARRISON
                               Department of Environmental Control
                                          Chicago, Illinois
  It is difficult to write a paper of readable length on
 such a broad topic. It takes arrogance or naivety to even
 attempt  it. However, not to do  one's best shows a
 contentment with ignorance. Not  being so contented,
 the author  wishes to plead only humility, leaving the
 reader to choose the motive.
  In order to properly scale the task we should consider
 the magnitude (or better stated, the lack of magnitude)
 of the subject  in  mind. If we wish to end up with a
 reasonable approximation of the  concentration  of a
 trace element floating in the free atmosphere, we must
 first realize that a sampler is a concentrative process. For
 example,  the high volume  sampler will  draw
 approximately  1.5 to 2 cubic meters of air through the
 filter each minute. Usually these will run for 24 hours,
 representing somewhere between 2200 and 2900  cubic
 meters of air concentrated on a piece of paper 63 square
 inches in surface, each inch representing about 40  cubic
 meters of air. We then take that filter paper, remove the
 material by extractions, and then institue a subsequent
 chemical concentrative process. We thus go through two
 concentrative and one removal process with all the
 biases, errors, and selectivities involved. Considering all
 possible  points  of  error, it seems a miracle that we get
 meaningful results  at all. In many unfortuante cases we
 probably fooled ourselves into thinking so.
  We make this example  in order  to show that indeed
 there are difficult, but not unique, problems in obtaining
 elemental analysis in  the atmospheric environment. The
 scope of this  paper will  be  to  point  out a general
 procedure, considerations  involved,  and suggest  some
 needs and solutions to those needs. Since  there are as
 many details in the  analytical procedures  as there are
 chemists, we will simply give an outline of a workable
 procedure with  details and examples.
 Suggested Procedures in Reaching a Believable Number
  The first task that we must do is the obvious literature
 search. This is  an  imperative task  but should be  done
with a jaundice eye. There are some base  documents
which could be suggested at this time. Probably one of
the most complete documents of elemental analysis of
particulate in  the air is a thesis (1) which lists several
values of more than 30 elements obtained from both
urban sources and the northwest Indiana area (2), as well
as data from more remote areas across southern Canada.
There are  other  general documents such  as the  air
quality data from the National Air Sampling Network
(NASN)  prepared by  the  Federal Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA).  The  latest  completed
document is for 1968 values (APTD-0978,1968). Other
more  recent information  is available  through
professional society  publications. The problem with
these  documents  is  that they represent only one site,
usually located in the center of an urban area. Exposures
of these sites  are not all representative of these areas.
For  example,  in  Chicago  the station  is located
approximately  15 feet back from one  of the  most
heavily traveled streets and is 12 feet above the ground.
Add the  fact  that it is within 5 feet of  a  seven-story
building, in an  area surrounded by even taller buildings,
and it is no  wonder that  this  station  shows high
particulate levels as well as high concentrations of trace
metals. This accounts for a tendency toward larger size
distributions than other stations which are not located in
dust traps.
  We  can  usually  find  documents  on a particular
element.  Lead, copper, and cadmium  have  been
described in an urban area for six separate days over a
network  of 50 stations throughout the Chicago and
northwest Indiana regions (2). Please see Table 1.
  Many  older  documents cite  numbers which can be
used as  guidelines. For example,  prior to  1960 there
were over 3,000 references to lead alone. Of course, the
more  rare the element, the more rare the references in
most cases.
  Having perused the literature and estimated the size of
the needle, we must now choose a method of capture
                                                123

-------
124
CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
and a  method  of analysis.  In both cases we should
concern ourselves  with  sensitivity.  If it  is known or
suspected that the  particle size distribution is such that
the particles are less  than  1  micron on the average, we
should  consider more  positive, smaller  pored  filter
papers.  Good references are obtained from companies
making  filter papers such as  Gelman Instruments, Ann
Arbor, Michigan and  Millipore  Corporation, Rosemont,
Illinois.  If the average size of the particle is unknown or
it  is larger  in  the mean  than 1  micron, a standard,
inexpensive high volume filter is probably as good as any
device in capturing a larger amount of material over a
reasonable period of time.
  Now comes the problem. If we want a large amount of
sample we use the whole filter, which then could draw
high contamination or blank value  from the paper. On
the other hand, we  can choose a smaller part of the filter
paper,  decreasing  our  blank  substantially, but  also
decreasing  our  sample.  A  convenient   method of
optimizing  this problem is to calculate a signal, i.e.,
                                           concentration,  to blank  ratio  which automatically
                                           dictates that before any sampling is analyzed a thorough
                                           investigation, concerning the contamination of the filter
                                           media be made. Tables 2 through 8 are  examples of the
                                           kind of thoroughness required for selection of the filter
                                           for impaction  media for subsequent analysis by neutron
                                           activation (3).
                                            Assuming that we have  acceptable blank  levels, we
                                           must  decide how much material to capture in order to
                                           obtain a meaningful sample. The amount will be dictated
                                           by  the method of analysis. Now we see  that we have to
                                           make two  decisions in fairly rigid tandem.  We either
                                           choose  the  time period  of investigation and obtain a
                                           method  capable of the  necessary  sensitivity, or we
                                           choose a method and alter  our sampling time or amount
                                           necessary for capture accordingly. In most cases, this is a
                                           moot point  because the equipment is already purchased
                                           before  the  counter  decision   has  been  made.
                                           Unfortunately, too many times, the net result is that the
                                           micro-structure  desired is  elusive due  to  the lack of
                 TABLE 1  CONCENTRATIONS AT MAXIMUM, MINIMUM, AND CONTROL STATION

Element
S
Fe
Ca
Cu
Al
Mg
K
Zn
Na
Mn
Br
Ti
Cr
Sb
V
Ce
As
La
W
Ag
Hg
Se
Ga
Sc
Co
Th
Sm
Eu
In

Maximum
18,000 (10,000)*
13,000 (3,000)
7,000 (700)
4,000 (200)
3,100 (300)
2,700 (1,000)
1,860 (110)
1,550 (200)
500 (50)
390 (50)
300 (30)
280 (50)
113 (20)
31 (3)
18.1 (1.5)
13 (1.5)
12 (2)
5.9 (0.4)
5.6 (1)
5 (2)
4.9 (0.9)
4.4 (1.2)
3.5 (1.0)
3.1 (0.3)
2.6 (0.6)
1.3 (0.4)
0.65 (0.20)
0.17(0.03)
0.15 (0.06)
Concentrations ng/m3
Minimum
3,000 (3,000)
1,420 (120)
1,410 (200)
25 (4)
1 ,375 (70)
530 (300)
730 (90)
100 (12)
160 (20)
63 (3)
26 (2)
120 (25)
6.2 (0.8)
2.2 (0.2)
4.01 (1.0)
1.4 (0.1)
2 (1)
0.9 (0.3)
0.3 (0.3)
0.5
0.8 (0.3)
0.8 (0.5)
0.25(0.15)
0.92(0.1)
0.47 (0.06)
0.17(0.02)
0.17(0.02)
0.06(0.01)
0.03 (0.03)
Concentration Ratios
Niles
11,000 (5,000)
1,900 (100)
1 ,000 (200)
280 (20)
1 ,200 (70)
500 (300)
720 (50)
160 (20)
170 (20)
62 (3)
38 (6)
120 (25)
9.5 (0.8)
6.0 (0.3)
5.0 (0.3)
0.82 (0.06)
4.6 (2)
1.3 (0.3)
0.4 (0.2)
1
1 .8 (0.3)
2.5 (0.5)
0.9 (0.4)
1.2 (0.1)
0.95 (0.1)
0.27 (0.08)
0.24 (0.03)
0.055 (0.02)
0.04 (0.03)
Max/Min
6 (9)
9.7 (3)
5.0(0.7)
160 (30)
2.3 (0.3)
5.1 (3)
2.5 (0.4)
16 (2)
3.1 (0.4)
6.2(1)
12 (1.5)
2.3 (0.7)
18 (3)
14 (2)
4.5(1.2)
9.3(1)
5 (4)
6.6(2.5)
19 (19)
10
6.1 (3)
5.5(3)
14 (10)
3.4(0.4)
5.5(1)
7.6(2)
3.8(1.5)
2.8(0.5)
5 (5)
Max/Niles
1.6(1.0)
7.2 (2.0)
7.0(1.5)
14 (1.5)
2.6(0.3)
5.4(3)
2.4(0.3)
9.6(1.4)
2.9 (0.4)
6.3(1.0)
8.1 (2)
2.3 (0.7)
12 (2)
5.3(0.7)
3.6(0.4)
16 (4)
2.6(1.2)
4.5(1.0)
14 (7)
5
2.6(0.7)
1.5(0.6)
3.9(1.2)
2.6(0.3)
2.7 (0.7)
(1.0)
2.0(0.4)
3.0(0.5)
3.7 (3)
(After K. Rahn 1971)
•Large filter
impurity correction.





-------
                                                                            MONITORING - AIR
                                                 125
sensitivity and specificity of the analytical technique and
instrumentation.
  Following  the  same argument,  we  usually  try  to
increase the  effective sensitivity of our instrumentation
by separating the participate material from our capturing
media or by extracting the interesting part.  We  then
must  concern  ourselves  with  the  efficiencies  of
extraction and the possible interference due to elements
of similar  chemical nature. At this point the arguments
take place among the chemists,  and  I  desist from
pursuing this particular subject any further except to say
that the task must be  to increase the sensitivity of the
instrumentation and to eliminate those  separations and
subsequent concentration techniques which require very
pure reagents  and  the precision of  a  dedicated
watchmaker.
  Assuming  the above considerations are well under
control, we must now estimate the number and locations
of  the  samples  needed for proper description  of the
phenomena of interest. Once the number of samples has
been estimated, treble it, for experience so dictates. This
will cause  us to calculate the time it will take to analyze
all our samples (which usually forces the researcher back
to  the  drawing board to  narrow  the scope  of study
and/or to select  a new method  of analysis). In some
cases, time  advantage  can be found through parallel
analysis rather than serial, one at a time, methods. For
example, if  equipment is  available we can batch the
preparations and chemical procedures. Anodic stripping
voltametry (ASV)  has  an  advantage, inasmuch as it is a
timed analysis  which allows multiple platings sequenced
a minute  or two apart. The  samples are analyzed and
changed before the next sampling sequence is ready for
stripping (2).
  Throughout  this whole procedure we must carry along
blanks of the  capturing media precisely the way we
would handle the media and sample itself. For example,
filter papers  from the same box should be carried to the
site, put on the sampler, and removed without a sample
being taken. These samples should be analyzed as if they
were real. We can detect and correct for system blanks in
this manner  if they so occur. This  is a primary control
method for  the  media.   Of  course,  good  chemical
standards should also be prepared and carefully checked.
  We will  pause here, after describing many  of the above
problems, to clearly state the needs to this point. They
are as follows:
1. A more positive capturing technique.
2. The  capturing  media  must be relatively  clean,
   homogeneous, and have  a listed assay as required by
   any chemical reagent.
3. We must eliminate many of the extraction, separation,
   and  chemical concentrative steps by increasing the
   sensitivity of the physical measuring devices.
   Having  forged onward  to  the  obtaining of  several
numbers, and having full confidence in those numbers
and their error limits, we will  now hypothesize that we
have efficiently captured the material in question, have
analyzed  that  material for the element(s) so desired,
subtracted the  blanks, eliminated  its systematic errors,
and  have a   reasonable  understanding of  the
concentrations. We now proceed to the next step.

Data Representation and Interpretation
  Two primary areas  to consider in interpretation of
your hard-won  data are the manner of presentation and
pertinent  auxiliary information. These considerations
probably  take  as large  a  share  of failures  as do the
problems with analytical techniques.
  This first point is axiomatic. We  should not involve
ourselves in securing or interpreting atmospheric samples
of air quality without the advice and consultation of a
reasonably  qualified applied meteorologist.  With even
brief  consultation  periods, we can  eliminate  many
potentially fatal mistakes.  A case in point is that of a
renowned  researcher  who  carefully correlated excess
deaths of infants and aged  persons  downwind  of a
nuclear  power  plant. His evidence and conclusions
showed that there were approximately 10 percent excess
deaths in  an area away from the prevailing wind. After
presenting his  evidence  at  more than one meeting, as
well as causing civilian alarm by newspaper  releases, a
meteorologist  pointed out that the  barbs  on the wind
direction lines are customarily put on the end of the line
pointing   in the direction from  which  the wind is
blowing.  Thus  this nonmeteorologist  statistician  had
proven that nuclear radiation from this particular facility
was good for   children and  the aged. This example
illustrates one  of the obvious needs for a meteorologist
to assist in the design and interpretation of the data.
  Associated data could take the  form  of the  total
suspended particulate weights to indicate the  percentage
of total sample with respect to  the elements in question.
Wind parameters, direction, and speed are  needed to
estimate  the transport   characteristics  so we  can
subsequently identify  the source region. Finally, an
estimation of the source inventory is desired  in order to
validate our source  strength predictions  or  to suggest
new hitherto unknown sources. These inventories should
take the form of both point source and area-wide source
estimations. Examples of this technique are presented in
Figures  1  to 8, representing an area-wide distribution of
suspended particulate, its  lead fraction,  selected wind
roses, and an estimation of the urban  traffic densities.
The weakest point in  this presentation, as often is the
case, is the emission inventory. Copper and cadmium are
presented  for   the  same  day but without emission
inventory  data.  Another  set  of data are  shown in
Figures 9  to 12 (2). Depicted here is the dependence of
lead levels on wind direction adjacent to a large metro-
politan area. It  should be noted that the  maximum
occur shortly after the wind direction  comes from the
sector containing the  large city.  The  minimum occur
outside  that sector.  It will also be noted  that the lead

-------
126
CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
levels reached a detectable minimum while the copper
and cadmium levels continued to drop below detectable
limits, representing a  background  value  for lead. We
present  this   data  in  order  to  show  that  proper
interpretation and presentation of associate information
leads  to much greater wealth of knowledge than simple
presentation of the data by itself.
  In summary,  we should have sufficient information to
properly  understand   the  emission  strengths and
transport characteristics of our contaminants, as well as
the amount of receptor exposure (concentration).
  We  have shown two methods of data representation
which inherently contain compilation and correlation
difficulties. The first is that of isopleth analysis where,
for example, concentration values may  be too large to
conveniently  plot and/or where  isopleth  gradients are
too steep to draw a distinguishable line. When  comparing
air quality data directly to meteorological data, a second
difficulty, that  of correlation, is made evident. To  a
statistician  it is  obvious that  if time was held constant,
correlations  between  trace  metal  concentrations and
wind  speed, wind direction,  humidity, and etc. would
probably  lead   to  poor  or superfluous  conclusions.
Plotting the  information adjacent  to each  other, we
realize a time delay in the advection of the material from
the source region to the sensor. The conclusions are thus
convincing  without  being  lost  in  the  statistical
formulations. Please see Figure 10.
  We  cannot represent  such  area-wide data  in straight
concentration  isopleths,  but in  percentages  of  the
maximum. Figures 13 and 14 represent the usefulness of
such techniques. In this presentation we plot logarithmic
percentages  of  concentrations  from  50, 25, 12,  6
percent, and  so on. The advantage is that  we have  a
graphical means of interpreting source regions  (or lack
thereof) in a relatively uncluttered  manner  while still
maintaining  sufficient  detail.  Point sources  become
obvious due to the reasonable clustering of the isopleths.
If there are  no local sources we  can draw few lines of
constant  percent  due  to the   lack of  variation  in
concentrations. These  two graphs indicate separate wind
directions  which easily indicate a source region west and
between Stations "J" and "G"
  If a large number of days or periods of samples can be
                                            obtained, pollution roses such as shown in Figure 15 are
                                            very helpful. Nonvariation  in  the concentration of a
                                            pollution rose indicates that either the material is fairly
                                            universal throughout a large region and is background in
                                            origin,  or  that  the  material  is emitted  uniformly
                                            throughout the region (e.g. lead).
                                              A final point should be made. In circumlocution, it is
                                            important to carefully select and properly describe the
                                            location  of the sampling points.  Again,  a  reasonably
                                            competent applied  meteorologist  can be  of invaluable
                                            assistance. At the onset of this article the location of a
                                            certain  continuous air  monitoring  project  station
                                            (CAMP)  was  discussed.  The  advisability of  such  a
                                            location is not to be criticized if we fully understand and
                                            desire  to  measure  that  particular situation.  We can
                                            severely criticize anyone who extends his interpretation
                                            of data gained from such a biased location to the total
                                            region. In other words, we should use multiple sampling
                                            points to   describe  a  region's  exposure  to any
                                            contaminant. Single point  source  sampling  should be
                                            used only when the location is  properly described in
                                            sufficient detail for the reader who may use such data to
                                            know precisely the limitations of such data. Thus, we
                                            need a careful selection of sampler sites.

                                            CONCLUSIONS
                                              Our conclusions will be quite brief and simple. After
                                            discussing  the above  considerations pertaining  to site
                                            locations,  analytical  techniques,  interpretations, and
                                            methods of presentation, it becomes quite apparent that
                                            if we are  to succeed in the business of advancing the
                                            knowledge  of elemental concentration distribution in
                                            the  atmospheric environment  we  must rely upon the
                                            experience and expertise of several disciplines. We must
                                            conclude that any meaningful experiment will  be well
                                            thought out  and discussed in detail with persons of
                                            many disciplines in  conjunction  with the researchers.
                                            Our purpose  is to convince one that this approach is
                                            mandatory.
                                              If one is to not sentence his hard earned numbers to
                                            the  archives  of perfunctory  literature, we would suggest
                                            that  a  multi-discipline  team approach be chosen. It is
                                            quite evident that our utmost and immediate problem is
                                            to meet the obvious needs.

-------
TABLE 2  FILTER MATERIAL INVESTIGATED
Filter Material
Polystyrene
Polystyrene
Cellulose-
organic binder
Cellulose
Membrane
cellulose esters
Membrane
cellulose esters
Membrane
cellulose esters
Membrane
cellulose esters
Membrane
cellulose acetate
Membrane
cellulose triacetate
Manufacturer's Name
Microsorban
Microsorban
Whatman No. 41
—
MF-Millipore
MF-Millipore
MF-Millipore
MF-Millipore
Cellotate
Metricel
(Key)
(PS)
(DMS)
(W41)
(C)
(HAWP025)
(HAWP047)
(AAWP025)
(AAWP047)
(EHWP047)
(GA-6)
Manufacturer
Delbag Luftfilter
(Germany)
Delbag Luftfilter
(Germany)
W. and R. Balston
Ltd. (England)
C. H. Dexter and Sons
(USA)
Millipore Filter
Corp. (USA)
Millipore Filter
Corp. (USA)
Millipore Filter
Corp. (USA)
Millipore Filter
Corp. (USA)
Millipore Filter
Corp. (USA)
Gelman Instrument
Co. (USA)
Specifications
-
—
—
—
Pore size 0.45 um,
diameter 25 mm
Pore size 0.45 um,
diameter 47 mm
Pore size 0.8 um,
diameter 25 mm
Pore size 0.8 um,
diameter 47mm
Pore size 0.5 um,
diameter 47mm
Pore size 0.45 um,
diameter 47mm
Comments
No longer
available
Presently
available
Tightly
woven
Loosely
woven
—
—
—
—
—
—
(After K. Rahn 1971)
                                                                          O
                                                                          •z,


-------


Cl
Br
S
Na
K
Mg
Ca
Ba
A]
Sc
Ce
La
Ti
Fe
Mn
Co
Ni
Ag
Cu
Zn
Sb
Cr
Hg
V

PS
3,000
25
80
20
< 200
300
7,000
20
0.04
<0.4
<0.2
10
100
1
0.2
25
<2
10
60
2.5
5
3
0.06

DMS
27,000
1,000
±30,000
90
8
< 1 ,500
300
<500
20
<0.01
< 1
<0.1
70
85
2
0.2
<25
< 2
320
515
1
2
1
< 0.6

W41
100
5
150
15
<80
140
< 100
12
<0.05
<0.5
<0.2
10
40
0.5
0.1
<10
2
<4
<25
0.15
3
0.5
<0.03
TABLE 3
C
300
20
6,000
700
200
2,400
3,800
< 100
200
0.2
<0.3
<0.3
50
300
80
0.8
60
3
90
30
0.5
12
3
0.5
FILTER IMPURITY LEVELS (ng/cm2)
HAWP025
1,000
4
600
130
<300
670
<100
20
<0.05
<0.5
<0.1
15
40
7
0.2
<8
<4
20
25
0.5
15
<0.4
<0.06
HAWP047
1,000
3
330
100
<200
250
< 100
10
<0.01
< 1
<0.2
5
<300
2
< 1
<50
-
40
20
3
14
< 1
0.09
AAWP025
1,700
< 5
4,800
520
120
400
500
<100
15
<0.01
<0.5
<0.5
10
80
2.5
0.4
14
< 3
85
10
0.4
20
< 1
<0.2
AAWP047 EHWP047 GA-6
1 ,000 1 ,800 600
< 2 6 4
400 1,800 2,200
100
200
370 570 1,250
<100
10 60 740
< 0.05
< 0.3
< 0.2
< 10
40
262
0.1
< 20
< 1
60 25 30
7
1
15
0.5
<0.05 < 0.05 <0.05
CYCLING
X
O
n
0
70
0
o
hn
tn
H
£













(~) not determined.
(After K. Rahn 1971)

-------
                                      TABLE 4  SELECTED PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF FILTERS
Filter material
Flow rate (1-minr '-cm"2)
20 x 25 cm
(effective surface 400 cm2 )
Flow rate (l-minr'-crrT2)
47 mm diameter
(effective surface 9.62 cm2)
Flow rate (1 -min ." l - cm" )
25 mm diameter
(effective surface 3.68 cm2)
Retention (%) of 0.3 ^m
D. 0. P. aerosol*
(25 mm diameter)
Retention (%) of 0.3 Mm
D. O. P. aerosol *
(20 x 25 cm)
Volume filtered
at 1 0% reduction in flow *
(m3 air/cm2 filter)
Thickness (mm) t
Tensile strength (kg- cm" 1 ) £
PS
4.5
6.5
12
99.96
99.8
48
0.15
DMS
4.5
6.5
13
99.95
99.7
35
0.15
W41 C
4.5 6
6.5 7
13 17
99.7
91 80f
2.0 >50*
2.8*
0.25
1.41
HAWP025 HAWP047 AAWP025 AAWP047 EHWP047 GA-6
2.6 - 4.8 2.6 2.6
4.3 7.3 - -
>99.98 - 99.97 - -
4.1* 4.1* 6.3 6.3
0.29 0.29
'Determined by the authors in Ann Arbor, Michigan

t Determined by Brar et al. (1970) for total participate by weight in Chicago

^Determined by Lockhart and Patterson (Lockhart, L. B., and R. L. Patterson, In: RL Report 6054,
 U. S. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D. C., 1964.

(After K. Rahn 1971)
S
O
2
H
O
?o


1
I

-------
130       CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
                  TABLE 5  SAMPLE/BLANK RATIOS FOR 25 mm DIAMETER W41
                           FILTERS, USING NILES, MICHIGAN CONCENTRATIONS
(Sample/Blank)
Element
Cl
Br
Na
K
Ca
Al
Ti
Fe
Mn
Co
Sb
Cr
V
Cu
Zn
•For \l\
Cone.
100
70
200
400
900
800
100
600
30
0
2
10
3
30
60
mmdiame
(ng/m3) 1 hr sample
t 0.6t
8
0.8
16
4
40
6
9
35
.3 1-8
8
2
>60
> 4
> 1.4
;ter multiply by 2'|7
4 hr sample
2.3t
33
3
62
15
160
23
35
140
7.0
31
8
>230
> 17
> 5.6

*
24 hr sample
12t
160
16
310
75
800
120
180
700
35
160
40
> 1200
> 80
> 28

                  "("From cascade impactor data of same period.
                 (After K. Rahn 1971)
           TABLE 6 SAMPLING TIMES TO EQUAL BLANK VALUES OR DETECTION LIMITS
Sampling time at Niles in hours on 25 mm filter disc to equal:
Element
Cl
Br
Na
K
Mg
Ca
Al
Ti
Fe
Mn
Co
Cu
Zn
Sb
Cr
Detection
Limit
2
0.15
0.5
0.1
1.5
0.5
0.02
0.6
1
0.05
2.8
2
0.7
2
0.8
PS
Blank
60
0.8
1
0.1
—
0.7
0.05
0.2
0.3
0.08
1.5
1
2.5
3.5
1
DMS
Blank
500
29
0.9
0.04
—
0.6
0.04
1
0.25
0.15
1
25
18
1.5
0.35
W41
Blank
1.7
0.15
1.5
0.085
—
0.25
0.025
0.1
0.1
0.035
0.6
_
—
0.2
0.5
C
Blank
4
0.4
5
0.8
4
5.5
0.3
0.5
0.6
4
3.3
5
0.75
0.5
1.5
HAWP025
Blank
50
0.35
18
2.2
—
3.8
0.15
0.7
0.35
1.5
3.5
5
2.5
2
7.8
AAWPO25
Blank
50
—
9
1
1.5
1.7
0.06
0.35
0.4
0.3
4
12
0.6
1
6
            ( ) If for the blank value only a higher limit was found or if it was not determined.
            (After K. Rahn 1971)

-------
                                         MONITORING - AIR      131
TABLE 7  POLYSTYRENE-CELLULOSE EFFICIENCY COMPARISON
Element
Cl
Br
S
Na
K
Mg
Ca
Al
Ga
Sc
Ce
La
Sm
Eu
Ti
Fe
Mn
Co
Ni
W
Ag
Cu
Zn
As
Sb
Atmospheric concentration (ng/m3)
Polystyrene
4400 (500)*
350 (90)
15 (15)
900 (150)
4000 (400)
730 (400)
4100 (800)
2300 (400)
4.5 (1.0)
4.9 (0.6)
17 (3)
4.6 (0.5)
0.67 (0.10)
0.18 (0.04)
170 (50)
22,000 (4,000)
240 (40)
3.9 (0.5)
55 (55)
1.5 (0.7)
3 (3)
130 (20)
4400 (200)
29 (7)
21 (5)
Whatman no. 41
7500
500
43
1300
4200
760
3900
2800
4.6
3.4
12
4.6
0.67
0.13
280
15,000
280
2.9
70
<2
2.5
160
4300
35
21
(500)
(50)
(25)
(200)
(200)
(150)
(500)
(200)
(1.5)
(0.5)
(2)
(0.5)
(0.10)
(0.03)
(0.03)
(3,000)
(30)
(0.4)
(60)

(2.0)
(20)
(200)
(8)
(5)
Concentration ratio
What. no. 41 / poly.
1.70
1.43
2.87
1.44
1.05
1.04
0.95
1.22
1.02
0.69
0.71
1.00
1.00
0.72
1.65
0.68
1.12
0.74
1.27
-
0.83
1.23
0.98
1.21
1.00

-------
132       CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
                         TABLES IMPURITY LEVELS IN
                                DURETHENE POLETHYLENE,
                                NO. 12010
Element
Cl
Br
Na
K
Mg
Al
Sc
Ce
La
Ti
Fe
Mn
Co
Ni
Ag
Cu
Zn
Sb
Cr
Hg
Concentration (ng- cm 2)
8 (2)
1.0 (0.5)
2.5 (0.4)
1.2 (0.3)
8 (6)
6.8 (1.0)
< 0.006
< 0.009
< 0.04
11 (6)
<11
0.10 (0.02)
0.02 (0.01)
< 1.3
< 0.3
1.0 (0.5)
2 (1)
0.04 (0.01)
< 0.3
< 0.1

-------
                                                                  MONITORING - AIR        133
                                                                   MICHIGAN CITY
ILLINOIS
                                               INDIANA
                           Figure 1.  Estimation of heavy traffic densities.

-------
134
CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
                                   THURS. 20 JUNE, 1968
         ILLINOIS
                                                       INDIANA
                    Figure 2. Wind direction. Arrows point in the direction that the wind is
                             blowing. The number depicts the number of hours of that
                             direction. C represents number of hours calm (3 miles per hour
                             or less).  This convention is opposite to classical methods used
                             by meteorologists.

-------
                                                                     MONITORING - AIR        135
                                THURS 20 JUNE 1968
                                    SUSPENDED PARTICULATE >ug-m-3
                                     LAKE MICHIGAN
CHICAGO     250,/V) \«
ILLINOIS
                                                  INDIANA
                                                                      MICHIGAN CITY
               Figure 3. Isopleths of suspended particulate.  Data obtained from 24-hour,
                        high-volume samplers.  Original data shown on Figure 4.

-------
136       CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
                                 THURS 20 JUNE 1968
 CHICAGO
                                      SUSPENDED PARTICULATE Mg-m
 ILLINOIS
                                                   INDIANA
                                                                81
                      Figure 4. Suspended particulate values from individual stations.

-------
                                                              MONITORING - AIR
137
                          THURS. 20 JUNE, 1968
CHICAGO
ILLINOIS
             Figure 5. Isopleths of lead fraction from 24-hour high-volume samples.

-------
138
CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
                                 THURS. 20 JUNE, 1968
 CHICAGO
 ILLINOIS
                                                                    15
                                                     INDIANA
                                                                    .5
                    Figure 6.  Lead fraction of suspended particulate irom individual stations.

-------
                                                                  MONITORING - AIR       139
                             THURS. 20 JUNE 1968
CHICAGO
ILLINOIS
             Figure 1.  Isopleths of copper fraction from 24-hour high-volume samples.

-------
140         CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
                               THURS 20  JUNE  1968
                                              C u , n g— m
                                   LAKE  MICHIGAN
    CHICAGO

                                                     • 10
                                                        29
                                                              49
    ILLINO IS
                                                  INDIANA
                                                                18
                     Figure 8.  Copper fraction of suspended particulate from individual stations.
                               ANN  ARBOR
                                 MICHIGAN
                     Figure 9.  Location of Ann Arbor in relation to Metropolitan Detroit.

-------
                                                               MONITORING - AIR
                141
u
o
    26.7
     21.1
    15.6
    10.0
    -4.4
     -1.1
    -6.7
            I    I   I   I   I
          80


          70


          60


          50


          40


          30


  I   I    I 20
                                                                                      I
                                                                                      ei
               22    02    06    10    14     18    22    02    06    10     14

                        SAMPLE TIME, EST,  26-28 APRIL  1968

WIND DIRECTION
CO — '
O> s(J «>
o o o
00°
270°
I 1 l I I
-
1
5
111 III
m/s
. DETROIT
1 SECTOR |
h
-h
i i i 1 I


H^
~*~


=H,_H

1 1 1

^^^



1 1


^•^M

•
••^H

-
^M
;
-
1 1 1 1 1
                                                                                     - s
              22    02    06     10    14    18     22    02    06

                          SAMPLE  TIME, EST, 26-28  APRIL  1968
              Figure 10. Meterological parameters plotted versus time in 2-hour averages.
                       Width of vertical line for wind direction represents the arithmetic
                       variation in wind direction. The length of the horizontal line
                       represents the average wind speed in meters per second.
                                                                                     - E
                                                                                     - N
                                                                                     - W
10     14

-------
142
           CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
    3000
    1000
     300
      100
     300
      100
       30
       10
                     Pb BLANK
                      D  Q   Cu  BLANK
                                       Cd BLANK
              Pb o
              Cu n
              Cd A
                                                        1000
            22  02 06  10  14   18  22  02 06  10  14

            SAMPLE TIME EST 26-28  APRIL 1968

Figure 11. Concentration of lead, copper, and cadmium
          versus 2-hour time periods. Blank levels
          represent maximum values of any blank run.
                                                                          f      E      D

                                                                             PARTICLE SIZE-
Figure 12. Composite size distribution of the 21 sample
          runs (2-hour periods). H stage represents a
          back-up filter to a seven-stage Andersen sampler,
          mediandiameter 0.5 microns.

-------
                                                                              MONITORING - AIR
                                                                            143
                       6%  ,
                                     12%
  TRACE METAL
 CONCENTRATION
 lioplethi in percent of
                                                  12%
                                                                                                    12%
                          Percentage Compositior

                             of Particulate


                          110piettii in percent of

                          Maximum Concent ratio r
Figure 13. Distribution of zinc, April 11 and June 29, 1971.    Figure 14. Distribution of zinc, March 7 and 23, 1971.
   SO2 7-71  STATION 1
       N MAX 0-10
S02 7-71 STATION 2
   N MAX 0-28
S02 7-71 STATION 3
    N MAX 0-09
SO2 7-71 STATION 4
    N MAX 0-37
                           Figure 15. Selected wind roses for July 1971 from City of
                                      Chicago Telemetered Air Monitoring Network
                                      (TAMN). (Courtesy of Dr. M. J. Weins, University
                                      of Illinois Materials Engineering, Chicago).

-------
144
CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
REFERENCES
1. Rahn, K. A., Sources of Trace Elements in Aerosols —
    An Approach to Clean Air, Ph. D. Thesis, The Univ.
    of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1971.
2. Harrison,  P.  R.,  Area-wide Distribution  of  Lead,
    Copper,  Cadmium and  Bismuth  in Atmospheric
    Particulates in Chicago  and  Northwest Indiana:  A
    Multi-sample  Application and Anodic  Stripping
    Voltammetry,  Ph. D. Thesis,  The  Univ.  of
    Michigan, 1970.
3. Dams,  R., K.  A.  Rahn,  and J.  W. Winchester,
    Evaluation  of Filter  Materials  and  Impaction
    Surfaces for Nondestructive  Neutron  Activation
    Analysis of  Aerosols, Env.  Sci.  Tech.,  1971
    (submitted).
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.  Brar, S. S., D. M. Nelson, J. R. Kline, P. F. Gustafson,
     E. L. Kanabrocki, C. E. Moore, and D. M. Hattori,
     Instrumental  Analysis  for Trace Elements  Present
                                               in Chicago  Area Surface Air, J. Geophys. Res., 75
                                               (15), 2939,1970.
                                           2. Dams, R., J. A.  Robbins, K.  A. Rahn, and  J. W.
                                               Winchester, Nondestructive  Neutron  Activation
                                               Analysis of Air Pollution Particulates, Anal. Chem.,
                                               42,861,1970.
                                           3. Harrison, P. R., W. R. Matson, and J. W. Winchester,
                                               Time  Variations of Lead, Copper and  Cadmium
                                               Concentrations in  Aerosols  in  Ann  Arbor,
                                               Michigan, Atmospheric Environment 5, 613,1971.
                                          4. Harrison, P. R., K. A. Rahn, R.  Dams, J. A. Robbins,
                                               J.  W.  Winchester, S.  S.  Briar, and D. M. Nelson,
                                               Areawide Trace  Metal Concentrations Measured by
                                               Multielement Neutron Activation  Analysis, A One
                                               Day  Study in  Northwest Indiana,  APCA  21:9,
                                               September  1971.
                                           5. Rahn, K.  A., R.  Dams, J. A. Robbins, and  J. W.
                                               Winchester, Diurnal Variations  of Aerosol  Trace
                                               Element   Concentrations  as  Determined  by
                                               Nondestructive  Neutron  Activation Analysis, Atm.
                                               Env.,  1971  (in press).

-------
               MONITORING  FOR TRACE  METALS
                             WATER ENVIRONMENT
                                        D. G. BALLINGER
                              National Environmental Research Center
                                          Cincinnati, Ohio
MONITORING
  Monitoring for metals in the aquatic environment may
be described as (a) the location of significant sources of
metals discharged to surface waters, the characterization
of  these  discharges  as  to  specific  metals, their
concentration and physical  state, (b) the immediate
impact  of these  discharges  on  receiving water quality,
and (c) the broad evaluation of the concentration of
metals in the aquatic  environment, including natural
background  and  measurable  changes  due to human
activity.
  These types of monitoring may be classified as:
1. Source  Monitoring — resulting from  the mining,
  refining, and manufacturing use of metals.
2. Near-Source Monitoring — in the immediate vicinity
  of the discharge, to determine localized effects.
3. Ambient Monitoring  — baseline data collection to
  assess long-term changes and general levels of metals.
SOURCE MONITORING
  Responsibility  for monitoring metals at the source is
divided between the industry which creates the discharge
and the regulating  agencies, both state and federal,
charged with  maintaining satisfactory water quality. The
provision of  the 1899 Refuse Act requires the permit
applicant to identify the metals present in his waste and
to report the maximum concentrations present at any
time  (1).  The Standard  Industrial  Classification
categories reporting are listed in Table 1.
  Implementation  of the  new amendments to  the
Federal Water Pollution Control  Act will  similarly
require monitoring data on metals in industrial  effluents.
Routine examination of effluents will be needed  to
evaluate  the efficiency of treatment  and control
measures.
  State  regulatory agencies, in cooperation with EPA,
are conducting source sampling to determine compliance
with permit applications. These monitoring activities will
be expanded  under the new effluent guidelines and
      TABLE 1  HEAVY METAL REPORTING
                REQUIREMENTS
    SIC
classification
Industry
  10-14      Mining
     22      Textile Mill Products
  2491      Wood Preserving
     26      Paper and Allied Products
    281      Industrial Inorganic and Organic Chemicals
  2818      Industrial Organic Chemicals
  2819      Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing
    283      Drugs
  2879      Agricultural Chemicals
  2892      Explosives
     29      Petroleum Refining
     33      Primary Metal Industries
    332      Iron and Steel Foundries
    333      Primary Smelting and Refining
    336      Nonferrous Foundries
     34      Fabricated Metal Products
    347      Coating, Engraving
     36      Electrical Machinery
  3731      Ship Building and Repairing
    285      Paints, Varnishes, Lacquers, and Enamels

standards. Where violations occur, EPA is involved in
case preparation, i.e., gathering source data in support of
180-day notices or other legal actions.

NEAR-SOURCE MONITORING
  Collection of  metals  data  in receiving waters
establishes the immediate impact of the discharge. At
these downstream points concentrations are maximum,
since dilution and precipitation at greater distances will
reduce the levels significantly. Toxicity effects may be
                                                 145

-------
146
CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
acute in the mixing zone, and transport processes begin
in these areas. Evaluation of metals concentrations near
the source  contributes to  the separation of acute from
long-term chronic  effects. These data are  necessary to
establish the  responsibility  for  unsatisfactory water
quality  and to determine requirements for  abatement
from known sources of contaminants.
  The discharge of wastes containing heavy metals often
results in the formation of insoluble materials, as the
result of reaction with alkaline waters, coprecipitation,
or adsorption on clay particles. The familiar yellow boy
in streams receiving acid mine drainage is an example of
these chemical reactions. In many locations immediately
downstream from  metals discharges,  bottom sediments
contain large amounts of metals and may be classified as
industrial  sludges.  Sampling  and  analysis  of  the
deposited materials give important information on the
original source of the metals and are  essential to proper
evaluation of the impact on the receiving water. These
reservoirs of  metals  may contribute to poor water
quality long after the discharge has been eliminated.
  Monitoring  in  the vicinity of  waste  discharges  is
primarily the responsibility of the regulating  authorities
although many industries conduct their own programs to
assess impact. The states and EPA carry out surveys and
operate  long-term  stations  at  points  of  maximum
damage.
AMBIENT MONITORING
  Collection  of base-line water quality  data,  or trend
monitoring  as  it  is  often  called, is essential to an
understanding of  general water quality available for all
purposes and for  the  assessment  of degradation or
improvement  in   specific  waterway systems.  Public
agencies, both state  and federal, have been conducting
such monitoring programs for many years. In 1968 the
Federal  Water   Pollution  Control Administration
published a summary of trace metals data on  samples
collected from October 1962 through September 1967
at   approximately   130  stations throughout  the
contiguous United States (2). These data, derived from
more than 30,000 separate determinations, indicate that,
of  the  nineteen  elements routinely sought, boron,
barium,  and strontium occurred  with a  frequency of
over  98 percent, while aluminum,  lead,  chromium,
molybdenum, and  nickel varied  between  16  and 33
percent. Cadmium, beryllium, silver, cobalt, vanadium,
and arsenic  were  detected in less than 7 percent of the
samples.
  It should be emphasized that these data represent only
the  metals  in  solution and that total concentrations of
metals,  including  suspended forms,  would  be much
higher.  Concentrations given, therefore, represent only
the  minimum  levels  present and,  while  permissible
concentrations  established  by  the   USPHS  Drinking
Water Standards for public water supplies were exceeded
in only isolated samples, the levels considered  safe for
                                            aquatic life  were probably exceeded in many locations.
                                              The U. S. Geological Survey has published a survey of
                                            more  than  720  stations  sampled  in  October and
                                            November  1970 (3). The  samples  were analyzed for
                                            arsenic, cadmium, hexavalent chromium, cobalt,  lead,
                                            mercury, and zinc. As in the FWPCA study, only soluble
                                            metals were determined. Twenty-one percent of the
                                            samples has arsenic greater  than  10 /ug/1, 4 percent of
                                            the cadmium results exceeded  10 /ig/1 (the PHS  upper
                                            limit  for  drinking  water).  There were  no hexavalent
                                            chromium concentrations in excess of 50 /zg/1, and few
                                            samples contained more than 50 jLtg/1 of lead. In none of
                                            the samples did  the concentration of dissolved mercury
                                            exceed  5  /ig/1,  while a  significant number of samples
                                            exceeded the drinking water standard of 5000 jug/1  of
                                            zinc.
                                              A survey of public drinking water systems conducted
                                            by the Public Health Service in 1969 (4) has indicated
                                            that  1.6 percent of the supplies exceeded the limit for
                                            copper, 8.6 percent exceeded  the limit for iron, 8.1
                                            percent exceeded the limit for  manganese, and  1.4
                                            percent exceeded the mandatory limit for lead,  while
                                            standards  for the  other  metals were exceeded by less
                                            than   1   percent  of  the  water supplies  examined.
                                            Considering  that only 969  water  supplies were tested,
                                            some  concern for  the  quality of water reaching the
                                            consumer is  merited.
                                              All  of the above studies show a problem  of metals in
                                            the aquatic environment, but the problem may be more
                                            acute than  realized since limitations of sampling and
                                            analysis may hide significant factors of toxicity.

                                            DATA STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL
                                              Water monitoring data collected by federal and some
                                            state agencies is stored in a dedicated computer system
                                            operated by EPA.  A large  amount of information on
                                            metals concentrations in  surface waters is available from
                                            this data bank, which can be accessed by any of the ten
                                            regional EPA offices.
                                            MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
                                              A satisfactory monitoring program for metals in the
                                            aquatic environment  has  certain basic requirements.
                                            These are  proper sampling frequency, control of sample
                                            stability, specificity, adequate sensitivity, high degree of
                                            accuracy, and satisfactory analytical precision.
                                              Certain industrial operations  producing discharge  of
                                            metals are batch operations, resulting in wide variations
                                            in loading and concentration. Depending on the degree
                                            of dilution, the  downstream receiving waters may show
                                            similar  peaks requiring  adjustment  of the  sampling
                                            frequency to detect these variations.
                                              Heavy metals  in  many water and waste samples are
                                            unstable. Precipitation, adsorption on  silt particles and
                                            container walls,  and changes in  valence state may  occur
                                            soon after sample collection. Standard practice includes
                                            acidification with nitric acid at the time  of sampling to
                                            avoid these changes.
                                              In order to properly characterize the metals present, it

-------
                                                                        MONITORING - WATER
                                                 147
is essential that the analytical procedure be very specific
for the metal being measured. This specificity includes
determination  of  the  physical state of the metal,
example,  soluble  vs. insoluble  forms, as well as the
valence state of the metal. Iron and chromium are two
classic  examples  of the importance  of oxidation in
metals testing.
  Permissible levels of some metals  in surface waters are
extremely  low,  requiring analytical sensitivity in the
microgram per liter range. These  sensitivity requirements
often challenge the skill of the analyst.
  Because  of the necessity for determining compliance
with regulatory standards, a high degree of accuracy and
precision,  at the low concentrations encountered, are
additional requirements placed on the analysis.

AVAILABLE ANALYTICAL METHODS
  In the   past,  metals  in aquous solutions  were
determined by colorimetric procedures. While adequate
sensitivity  can often be obtained by these methods, they
tend to be tedious and subject to many interferences. In
the  dithizone procedures, for example, any or all of 17
other metals act as  interference in  the measurement of
the 18th.
  Currently, atomic absorption spectroscopy is the most
prevalent method for metals  analysis of water and waste
samples. A very  large number of metals can be measured
with these instruments, and when solvent extraction or
other  concentrating systems are  used,  sensitivity is
adequate for most monitoring purposes. In spite of the
versatility and  simplicity  of   the  instrument,   two
limitations of atomic absorption should be mentioned.
Only one metal may be measured at a time, so that rapid
screening   to characterize  the  metal  content  of the
sample  is very time consuming, and secondly, only total
metal  concentration is  determined, since the  flame
reduces all forms of the metal to the atomic species. In
spite of these limitations the advantages of AA make it
the method of choice in most laboratories (5). Recently
a number  of procedures  have been  developed using the
cold  vapor  atomic  absorption  technique.   The
determinations of mercury is the best known example of
this type  of procedure. The familiar Hatch and Ott
method for mercury is  based  on the absorption by
mercury vapor in the ultra-violet range of the spectrum
(6). Arsenic and  selenium can also be measured in this
manner, although the methods are not yet widely used.
It is likely that  other metals may be determined by
flameless  atomic  absorption  when the  analytical
methods are worked out.
  Atomic  fluorescence, another variation  of  the
instrumental approach, shows  promise of success for
certain  metals   not  susceptible to  measurement by
standard AA technique.
  Emission spectroscopy overcomes the single-element
limitation  of AA, since most emissions instruments can
be  programmed  to measure  20  to  30  elements
simultaneously  on the same sample (7).  This approach
offers  excellent possibilities  for  screening samples to
determine the presence or absence of specific metals. As
in the case  of  AA, extraction or concentration of the
sample  provides  the  needed  sensitivity for  most
purposes.  However,  the  total  metal   concentration,
without oxidation state information, is produced by the
emission instruments.
  Electrochemical  methods, particularly  polarography,
have long  been used for the determination of heavy
metals (8).  Before  the  advent  of atomic absorption,
polarography was considered a preferable substitute for
colorimetric methods. The technique, however, did not
gain the wide  acceptance enjoyed in Europe, and the
newer  and simpler   AA  method   has  relegated
conventional polarography to only a few laboratories.
Recently, however,  the anodic  stripping  polarograph is
being  seriously considered as  a  means  of measuring
certain metals (9). As  with conventional polarography,
the  oxidation   state   of the  metal  can  be  readily
determined,  and the  accumulation of  metal  on the
cathode  permits  excellent  sensitivity.  Commercial
instruments  are  now available  which  provide  good
accuracy and precision, without the analytical expertise
often  considered  necessary  for  conventional
polarography.
  A  number  of ion-selective  electrodes  have  been
developed for specific  metals. In  general, the electrode
approach does  not provide the  necessary sensitivity for
monitoring purposes and these systems are  largely used
to  measure  metals  in  concentrated solutions.
Improvements in sensitivity and selectivity  might make
the  electrodes  suitable for  continuous  monitoring
situations.
  A number of other instruments have  been proposed
and  are  being  used for  the  determination of metals.
Among these techniques  are neutron  activitation, mass
spectrometry,  microwave plasma, X-ray fluorescence,
and  others.  The  necessity  for  relatively  complex
instruments,  sophisticated data reduction systems, and
highly skilled operators  tend to  make  these  methods
unsuitable  for  routine analysis of a large number of
samples. While  each  has its enthusiastic  proponents,
these instruments have not gained with acceptance  at
this time.

QUALITY CONTROL
  In any  monitoring  program  the  quality of the  data
collected is extremely important. The significance of the
decisions made  from the  data requires that all analytical
results be as accurate as possible,  within the constraints
of workload, available methods, and economy. The only
way to define  and control the  reliability of laboratory
results is  through a well designed operational quality
assurance  program (10).  Such a program must include
the use of approved methods, the availability of suitable
equipment and instrumentation,  the  use  of daily

-------
148
           CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
controls  on  analyst  performance,  and  proper  data
handling systems. The National Environmental Research
Center,  through  its  Analytical  Quality  Control
Laboratory, regularly conducts  round-robin  studies to
establish the precision and accuracy of the methods used
by EPA laboratories. At the  present time a study to
evaluate atomic  absorption methods  for ten metals is
being  carried out  by  more  than  100  participating
laboratories in EPA,  the states, universities, and private
industry. The samples used in  the study are prepared to
exact concentrations  of each  metal,  covering the range
of expected  levels in  ambient waters and  industrial
effluents. The final report, which will be available to the
public, will describe  the standard deviation and bias of
each method, as well as the  range  and coefficient of
variation of the reported results.
  In  addition to conducting method studies, the AQC
Laboratory makes available a series of standard reference
samples for  a   variety  of environmental  monitoring
parameters, including  heavy  metals.  These samples,
available  without  charge,  can be  used to evaluate
analytical methods,  instrument,  and  analyst
performance, and  can  be used  for  intra-iaboratory
quality control.
SUMMARY
  Monitoring  for  trace  metals  in  the  aquatic
environment  involves source and near-source  sampling,
as well as  ambient monitoring for  baseline  data and
trend analysis.  Data from studies  by EPA and the
Geological  Survey  indicate  that  significant
concentrations of heavy metals exist in some  locations,
requiring  abatement  of discharges.  A number of
satisfactory analytical methods are available and in use
to determine  metals in water  and waste samples. Good
Laboratory quality  is  essential  to the  monitoring
program, and various  manuals  and reference samples are
available  from  EPA  to  assist in  establishing  and
maintaining efficient laboratory operations.
REFERENCES
  1. Application for Permit  to Discharge  or Work in
       Navigable  Waters  and Their Tributaries, Eng.
       Form 4345-1, Department of the Army, Corps
       of Engineers, Washington, D. C. 20314.
  2. Kopp, J. F. and  R. C. Kroner, Trace Metals in Waters
       of the United  States, U.S.  Dept. of Interior,
       FWPCA (Available from  Nat.  Env.  Research
       Center, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268).
  3. Durum,  W. H., J.  D.  Hern,  and  S.  G.  Heidel,
       Reconnaisance of  Selected Minor  Elements in
       Surface Waters of  the United States, Geological
       Survey Circular  643,  U.S. Geological Survey,
       Washington,  D. C. 20242, October 1970.
 4. Taylor, F. B., Trace Elements and Compounds in
       Waters, Journal  of the American Water Works
       Assoc. 63:728,1971.
 5. Methods for Chemical  Analysis of Water and Wastes,
       EPA, 1971  (Available from Nat. Env. Research
       Center, Cincinnati,  Ohio 45268).
 6. Kopp, J. F., M.  C. Longbottom,  and L. B. Lobring,
       Cold Vapor  Method  for  Determining Mercury,
       Journal of the  American Water  Works Assoc.,
       64:20, 1972.
 7. Kopp, J. F.  and R. C.  Kroner,  A Direct-Reading
       Spectrochemical  Procedure for the Measurement
       of Nineteen  Minor Elements in  Natural Waters,
       Applied Spectroscopy 19:155,1965.
 8. Ballinger, D.  G. and T.  A. Hartlage, Polarographic
       Determination  of Metals  in Water, Wastes, and
       Biological  Samples, Water and  Sewage Works,
       September 1962.
 9. Allen, H. E., W.  R. Matson, and K. H. Mancy, Trace
       Metal Characterization  in Aquatic Environment
       by Anodic  Stripping Voltametry,  Jour. Water
       Pollution Control Fed., 42:573,1970.
10. Handbook  for Analytical Quality Control in Water
       and Wastewater  Laboratories  (Available from
       Nat.  Env. Research  Center,  Cincinnati, Ohio
       45268).

-------
                     MONITORING  OF   SOLID  WASTES
                                            E. A. GLYSSON
                                       The University of Michigan
                                         Ann Arbor, Michigan
  Monitoring,  as  defined  by the  American College
Dictionary, is "something that serves to remind or give
warning." As applied to solid wastes, monitoring may be
used to identify the quality and/or composition of the
wastes.
  This might be expected to  assess the resource potential
of the waste,  its energy content,  or  the  content  of
material which might be recovered for  recycling.  Such
assessment would allow selection  of the most suitable
method for solid waste processing and disposal.
  The solid waste stream reflects all the substances that
are in use by the population from which it is derived. In
that  sense then  it can  contain anything that can  be
thrown away.  Substances  which  pose  hazards to the
environment and to the solid waste worker are included
in this material. Proper monitoring would lead to better
knowledge of these potential hazards and  provide for
better control. Hazardous materials,  generally speaking,
are  in small  quantities at  any  given  time  and are
sequestered in  a large amount of other  materials which
make up  the majority  of the refuse composition (1)
(paper  55 percent, metal 9 percent, glass 9  percent,
plastics 1 percent, food 14 percent, other 12  percent). In
this form  they are most  difficult to detect. Certain types
of hazardous materials may pose a danger  to the  solid
waste  worker either   during  collection   or at  the
processing or  disposal  site (example,  flammable  or
explosive  substances).  Ideally  a monitoring system
should  be devised  to detect such  materials.  From a
practical standpoint they constitute such a small number
of instances and amounts that they  rightly  or wrongly
are relegated to the classification of a calculated risk. (It
might be  stated that most hazardous materials such as
explosives are prohibited from being deposited in the
refuse by  local ordinances governing the collection and
storage of refuse.)
  There is another area of monitoring, that involved
with  solid waste disposal, where the  presence of small
amounts of various substances can have an adverse effect
on the quality  of the  environment, particularly  that
adjacent  to  the  disposal  site.  Monitoring  of the
discharges of a disposal facility are an example of this
problem.
  The  type of data needed  is relative  to  the  way  in
which  the information is  to be  used.  For the  most
efficient  control  of energy  recovery  systems
(incinerators), the calorific content, moisture content,
ash and noncombustible content are required. For the
recycling of metals and other materials it is necessary  to
measure the quantity  contained of the various fractions
to be recovered.
  Monitoring for trace metals or materials deemed to be
hazardous or toxic would of necessity be quite selective
since it is necessary to pick out small amounts of such
substances in a large mass of material. The possibility  of
hazardous  material appearing at  any time  makes the
monitoring continuous. It would generally be considered
adequate to detect the presence (yes  or no) rather than
the amount or quantity of a hazardous material.
  The  format of  the information has  to  reflect the
manner in which it will be  used. Continuous  readout
data would be helpful in monitoring the material  to be
fed  to   a  continuously fed  incinerator,  since the
operation of the furnace requires response to its fuel
supply.
  The  format needed for  evaluation  of material for
recycling would not need to be continuous. It could  be
intermittent, more to determine the  potential, initially,
and  later  to determine if the recovery operation was  as
effective as it was intended to be.
  Accuracy requirements of  a monitoring system vary
but in no case is it essential to be extremely accurate.
Combustibility or calorific   content  within 10 percent,
plus or minus, moisture within 5 percent, plus or minus,
are more than adequate for the control of an incinerator
based  on  fuel input.  Measuring the  metal content for
evaluating  recycling  potential or  efficiency  would
depend on how  good the  separation  process was
expected  to be  and  the accuracy of evaluation scaled
accordingly.
  The  accuracy  required in  monitoring the  discharges
                                                   149

-------
150
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
 from a disposal site would probably be more precise in
 that they  would have  to  detect smaller quantities of
 materials which  involve more sophisticated analytical
 processes. (In the final analysis this type of monitoring is
 actually easier than many of the others.) The accuracy as
 a  percentage would be adequate  to  plus or minus 10
 percent  in most  cases.  The frequency of measurement
 would need  to be  often enough to detect a significant
 change in  effluent quality  so that corrective measures
 could  be taken in time  to prevent any serious impact on
 the  environment. This varies with the type of possible
 pollutant and its form. Gases, for example, would be
 monitored very frequently, if not continuously, whereas
 ground water quality could be done much less often.
   As to where monitoring is to be done, it should reflect
 the  need  to respond to the results obtained. If the
 determination  is  to be  the basis  of  decision as to
 collection  and/or  storage  and  perhaps recycling of
 selected components, the monitoring  would be done (a)
 at the source (example, industry or residence) where
 different  modes   of  separation, storage  or
 containerization might be required, or (b) at the process
 point  (processing plant, landfill  or incinerator) so  that
 changes could be  made  as necessary  in  methods of
 operation.  If monitoring  of environmental quality by
 detecting the possible effects of leachate or air pollution
 derived  from a  disposal  facility  is  desired,  then the
 disposal site itself  or  the  area  immediately  adjacent
 should be selected.
   Monitoring techniques now in use vary rather widely.
 With a  few  exceptions they are  more  qualitative  than
 quantitative. Most  of the information obtained to date
 has  been  as the  result of  the manual partioning of
 representative samples of solid waste taken at the various
 points described earlier. The selection of categories into
 which the waste was divided being determined by the
 uses to which the data were to be put.
   Britton (2) has stated that a minimum size sample of
 300 pound  is  needed  for  most  studies of a  general
 nature. It was shown in this same study that a minimum
 of 10, 300 pound samples is necessary from 500 tons of
 waste  to maintain  a confidence interval of 90 percent.
 (In measuring constituents by this method, very little if
 any  effort  has  been  expended  in  measuring  trace
 elements,  only  the metals  present  in  relatively  large
 quantities  being  reported. All  others were grouped as
 other  or miscellaneous.)
   Monitoring techniques for  measuring metals and other
 constituents  of  leachate,  which may develop  from
 landfills, are  being used in conjunction with observation
 wells   and  lysimeters  constructed in  the  areas
 immediately  adjacent and beneath the  landfill. In general
 these  consist of some  sort of sampling equipment for
 taking  intermittent  samples  for  analysis by
 chromatographic or other techniques. These techniques
 are reasonably successful in measuring  the changes which
 occur  in ground water adjacent to disposal sites and the
effectiveness of sealants and other measures to reduce or
eliminate leaching  conditions.  They  are  expensive to
install, maintain,  and operate, especially considering the
length of time  needed for monitoring in some instances.
Metallic  ions such  as iron, zinc, nickel, copper, and
sodium can be determined (3).
  Equipment  for  monitoring   of stack gases  from
incinerators  on a continuous basis is available  but is
usually  limited  to  participate  determinations. This
equipment is expensive to install, maintain, and operate
and its reliability leaves  something to  be desired. Trace
metals can be  detected in samples of dust but are not
usually analyzed  routinely since air pollution codes  are
at present concerned only with particulates  per se. If and
when codes become  more  stringent  with  respect to
gaseous  and other  constitutents, more  sophisticated
analysis will  be used and trace metals  may be included.
In some special  industrial situations  where  hazardous
conditions  exist (lead, mercury, etc.), these  metals are
monitored routinely.
  Continuous  monitoring  of solid wastes  is a  most
difficult  task due to its variations in shape,  composition,
and complexity.  Several  methods are  in use  and  others
are under study and in various stages of development for
detecting and  segregating various  components from a
continuously moving  stream of solid  wastes.  (It is
usually necessary to pre-process the waste  by shredding
or grinding in some manner to produce a more uniform
particle size and to expose more of the  waste.)
  Magnetic separation of ferrous metals from the rest of
the waste has been in use for many years. This method is
relatively successful if the metal  is  accessible,  and a
certain amount of entrapped and  attached extraneous
material  is acceptable (in the case of raw refuse). Metal
can be separated from incinerator residues without much
more  treatment  than tumbling over  a coarse screen.
Rather complete  separation of nonferrous metals can be
accomplished from  certain types  of  waste  (example,
residues from  shredding  automobile bodies)  after
removal  of ferrous  metal magnetically. Other materials
are separated by  such means as air classification, heavy
media  flotation   and differential  melting  of  lower
temperature  melting  point metals  (4). In this process
zinc,  aluminum, stainless steel,  red metal,  and steel are
separated on a continuous basis. Rubber and  glass are
by-products  which can  be segregated if  a  market is
available. To date no trace metals are segregated by this
process.  If present  they  are considered as  impurities in
the other metals.
  There  are  several methods other than magnetic for
segregation and monitoring solid wastes on a continuous
basis  under  consideration and   development.  Material
might be monitored  on  the basis of its bulk density,
optical  characteristics, fiber   content,  eddy-current
reaction, and impact characteristics to name a few.
  Mechanical methods of monitoring on a continuous
basis  are essential  if the  many  idealized  objectives

-------
                                                                MONITORING - SOLID WASTES
                                                  151
described earlier are to be accomplished. Unfortunately
each of the proposed systems have much to be done to
them before they will be  ready for practical application
(5).
  There  is no practical continuous method available at
present  for determining  such  characteristics  as  the
moisture content of a heterogeneous mass such as refuse.
The infra red scanning technique for example can only at
present  measure the  character of the surface and is
complicated   by  the  presence  of  metals.  The
measurement of the calorific content is very slow and
cumbersome by present methods and there seems little
likelihood of being able  to improve the  situation. No
continuous  method  of evaluation  is  available.
Alternatives  to  continuous monitoring for incinerator
operation  might  consist  of  separation  of  the
noncombustibles prior to  some form of continuous
moisture  determination  which  when  coupled  with
statistically rigorous  information  from  prior  testing
could be  used  to  indicate the  combustibility of  the
material for control purposes.
  Detection of  trace metals in the refuse stream on a
continuous basis  seems  to be  highly unlikely  when
viewed  from  the  present  situation.   If  complete
processing were  considered which includes a reliable and
efficient  means  of  reducing the refuse to  a  uniform
particle  size, and  a reliable high velocity  automatic
sorting device was available to separate the constituents,
then monitoring for the presence of trace metals as well
as other metals might be possible.
  Several separation techniques have been developed and
are  in various stages of application. The  hydropulper
process separates fiber and performs several other sorting
operations  resulting, among others, in  a metal-glass
effluent  which  is  further   sorted  optically.  Air
classification, sorting  by  conductivity,  photometric
methods, sorting by "bounce" are some of the several
methods  besides  the  magnetic   separation  discussed
earlier which are being evaluated by various agencies and
individuals. In the main, these various  methods  need
testing and improving before they can be considered able
to  handle  economically and  continuously  such
diversified wastes as municipal  refuse. There  is  every
reason  to expect that the sorting techniques  will be
improved and problems  ironed  out  so  that adequate
separation can be accomplished in the future.
  Most monitoring  of waste streams today are  done
visually with adjustments  being based on judgment and
experience. If an  object is noted  which should be
removed it may  be taken  out by  hand. Hand sorting of
metal is still common in many salvage operations where
the  value of the material  is great enough to pay for its
removal. Visual monitoring of wastes at the disposal sites
(example,  sanitary  landfill)  may indicate  that the
material needs special handling to avoid difficulty in the
operation.
  The laboratory techniques used  to analyze the samples
taken  from monitoring  stations  at landfills  or  at
incinerators as  well as the setting up and operation of
the  sampling  equipment  require a certain amount  of
training and ability. Personnel who are assigned sampling
and  analytical responsibility  should  be  adequately
trained to carry out these tasks so that the results can be
depended  upon.  This  type of  training is  somewhat
specialized  and would  require  knowledge  of  basic
chemical laboratory technique and sampling procedures.
Such training can be obtained in several ways, ranging
from  formal college  training to short courses specially
taught thru some governmental agency.
  In general monitoring has been conducted only when
required by some regulatory agency in order to assure
compliance with a regulation or environmental quality
criteria.  The  exceptions  are  those  facilities where
research  or demonstration projects are being conducted
to determine the effects of some operation. Under these
circumstances monitoring  can  be  done by  the  waste
producer  to assure,  for  instance,  that  no  hazardous
materials enter  the solid waste stream.  This could apply
equally well  to householders and to industry. The level
of monitoring would vary widely from one extreme to
the other. This would be monitoring prior to collection
of the waste while  it is still at the point of generation.
Monitoring at the point of processing or disposal is more
likely  to be done by the  agency operating that facility
especially if the information is to be used to modify the
operation of the facility. If environmental quality is the
reason for monitoring, then the operator of the facility
may be responsible for the monitoring or it may be done
directly by the regulatory agency itself.
  The data gathered certainly will be useful locally.  Its
wider  spread usefulness may consist more of indicating
trends and variations from place to place and to indicate
effectiveness  of various  treatment  and  monitoring
methods.  Such trends and variations would likely be of
interest to  a state  or federal agency, especially those
involved with environmental quality.
  If the  generator of the waste is the one who benefits
from the information gained by  monitoring of his solid
wastes, then obviously he  should bear  the cost. If it is
necessary to monitor the wastes  on his  premises  to
protect his employees or  the  environment,  then  he
should also bear the cost as a part of his costs of doing
business. Since  the collector of the wastes in some cases
serves  as  an  employee  then  he  can  expect  some
protection as well from the monitoring of the wastes he
picks up.
  The disposer or   processor of the waste  may  be
responsible  for payment  for monitoring if he is  the
beneficiary  of the  information  as  in controlling his
operation.  He  may  also  be  required  to  provide
information supporting his position in protecting  the
environment  in which case he will  have  to pay for the
installation,  sampling, and testing  required in  the
monitoring system.  If the monitoring  is being  done  to

-------
152
CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
protect  the  environment,  then the regulatory agency
responsible for environmental control in the area must
maintain surveillance and monitoring equipment of its
own in order to assure that protection is being provided.
The  costs of such operation would most likely be paid
for by the regulatory  agency from public funds. There
have been instances where  those being regulated were
expected to  pay for such monitoring. In any situation
involving interstate jurisdiction a federal agency would
probably  be  involved.   In  this  case the  U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency would be expected to
monitor the  local agencies'  operations and would serve
as a collection  and distribution medium for data and
information  of  value to  other states and  agencies.
SUMMARY
  In summary  it  can be  said  that  at  present  the
monitoring  of  solid  wastes  in  general is far  from
adequate and for trace metals is hardly considered. More
must be learned of the importance of trace metals from
solid  wastes  upon  the  quality of the environment.
Studies to date have not indicated that trace metals are a
                                          problem from this source  (6), but more work needs to
                                          be done.
                                          REFERENCES
                                          1. Environmental  Data Handbook, American Can Co.,
                                               Feb. 1972.
                                          2. Britton,  P. W.,  Improvising  Manual Solid Waste
                                               Separation Studies,  Journ.  of  San.  Engr.  Div.,
                                               ASCE, Vol. 98, No. SA5, Oct. 1972.
                                          S.Fungaroli,  A.  A. and  R. L. Steiner,   A Study of
                                               Sanitary  Landfills  — Final  Report,  Drexel
                                               University, Nov. 1969.
                                          4. Glysson,  E. A. and J. Packard,  The Problem of Solid
                                               Waste Disposal, Ingenor 9, University of Michigan,
                                               Nov. 1972.
                                          S.Golueke,  C. G.,  Recycling and  Reusing Resource
                                               Residues,  Compost  Science,  Jour,  of  Waste
                                               Recycling, 12(3):4-9, May, June 1971.
                                          6. Zanoni, A.  E., Ground Water Pollution From Sanitary
                                              Landfills  and  Refuse  Dump  Grounds,  A Critical
                                              Review,  Dept.   Natural  Resources,  Madison,
                                              Wisconsin, 1971.

-------
         MONITORING  FOR  TRACE  METALS  IN  FOOD
                                             E. O. HAENNI
                          U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare
                                           Washington, D.  C.
INTRODUCTION
  Monitoring for trace metals in foods poses problems
of much greater scope  and complexity  than casual
consideration might suggest. It  is the purpose of this
paper to at least delineate these problems and to indicate
progress in their  control. The  privilege of giving the
presentation on this subject of major significance to the
Food and Drug Administration's area of responsibilities
is sincerely appreciated. This report will deal  with the
past and current situations and the business ahead, with
particular emphasis on the  analytical  aspects of the
subject. Although this  seems an excessively ambitious
coverage in the brief space available, an understanding of
the subject  problem as it has challenged the Food and
Drug  Administration  requires  at least  some  such
approach to develop an understanding of the analytical
and surveillance situations  as of today.
  This  presentation will be restricted primarily to the
analytical problems and surveillance activities of FDA in
this field, but these problems are quite common to other
agencies  responsible for  control of  toxic  metal
contaminants in foods and, accordingly, should suffice
to illustrate the general situation.
  Aside from the sporadic incidents which are always
upsetting our well-laid  plans, the primary  problems  in
contamination  of foods by  toxic  metal  residues
recognized prior to World War  II were  associated with
use of insecticides containing copper, mercury, arsenic,
and/or lead. Development  of methods, surveillance, and
regulatory  programs constituted major efforts of the
Food and Drug Administration  and of the responsible
state  and local  regulatory  agencies. For example, during
the apple  harvest  season  the entire inspectional and
analytical staffs  of  FDA  field stations  in  primary
growing areas were engaged in surveillance of apples for
lead arsenate residues.  Cases of apples awaiting analysis
were  then  stacked  from  floor  to ceiling at the  FDA
Cincinnati  Laboratory  where  I  worked. Similarly,
primary resources of field stations in other major crop
areas  were  assigned to surveillance for residues of lead
arsenate and of the other metal-based insecticides then
prevalent. At that time a major proportion of the staff
at the Washington Headquarters' Division of Food was
engaged in research to improve the sensitivity, accuracy,
and  reliability  of  analytical  methods for the
determination of such residues. The enormous growth in
the use of organic pesticides  following World War  II
posed new much  more complex residue problems. The
consequent  major displacement of  the conventional
metal-based  agricultural  poisons led  to  the  virtual
discontinuance  of research on  determination of toxic
metals in  foods, and  resulting loss over the years in the
food  laboratories of resources, both personnel  and
equipment,  adapted  to  trace heavy  metal analysis.
However,  the occasional diversion of surplus seed wheat
treated with  mercurial fungicides into the commercial
wheat  supply stimulated attempts to determine trace
levels of  mercury above background.  The FDA (1)
published  the technique for measurement of mercury by
cold vapor flow absorption  cell as early as 1966. Its
adaptation to determination of submicrogram quantities
of mercury in wheat, fish, and eggs (2, 3) gave initial
successful results  with  a sensitivity  of 0.01  ppm.
However,  the subsequent inability to acquire reagents
sufficiently free  of  mercury and  the very low  levels
found  in  the samples initially  analyzed (0.01  to 0.03
ppm)  discouraged continuance  of the  research.
Nevertheless as early as 1967, FDA checked the mercury
content of a number of total diet categories by neutron
activation analysis (4), finding values of the same order
as those cited above. It is interesting to speculate if the
mercury contamination problem in fish might not have
been  discovered  earlier  if the stringent  sensitivity
requirement for  the  specific wheat  problem had not
discouraged  further analytical  research on  mercury  at
FDA.
  The approach to food supply surveillance, the FDA
total  diet or  market basket  survey,  originated for
radionuclide surveillance  (primarily 90Sr)  was adapted
and proved effective  for pesticide residue monitoring,
and has now been expanded for use again as one means
of  surveillance  for  toxic  metals.  It is manifestly
                                                   153

-------
154
            CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
impossible  to  ensure  freedom from toxic residues of
every lot of every product in a food supply as enormous
and as diversified in kind, source, processing, packaging,
and distribution as that of the United States. The most
effective surveillance for overall safety which practicable
resources  can  provide is periodic examination of a
representative  total diet  for  potential toxic residues,
complemented  by  analysis of specific commodities in
which occurrence of particular residues is most probable.
The  concept and  use of  total  diet  or market basket
surveillance  have been described in  detail  (5). It  will
suffice here to summarize this FDA program currently as
periodic  collection  and  analysis,  as  prepared  for
consumption,  of twelve  composited food categories
representative of the two-week diet of a  15 to 20 year
old male for the northeastern, southeastern, central and
western regions  of the United States.
  At  this point, it  seems appropriate to emphasize that
the brunt of the surveillance and  monitoring work is
borne  by the District  Laboratories of the FDA.  The
function in the Division of Chemistry  and  Physics,
Bureau  of Foods,  is primarily to  undertake necessary
analytical  evaluation  and/or development  work  in
support of surveillance operations and to provide highly
specialized and  sophisticated analytical support services,
such  as neutron  activation  analysis. It  should  be
emphasized that the district laboratories also contribute
to the analytical research and evaluation,  both through
original work and through conduct  of and participation
in collaborative studies. These district  functions  are
greatly  facilitated by the  advice  of competent  outside
scientists  assigned to  each  district laboratory  as
consultants.
THE CURRENT SITUATION
  As  is  well  known,  the sudden resurgence  of  the
problem of  toxic  metals in foods arose with  the
Minamata incident in Japan and the findings of high
levels of mercury in fish in Sweden and in Lake St. Clair,
Canada.  There  was an immediate  need  for analytical
methods  applicable  to  determination  of inorganic
mercury and of the more toxic methylmercury found in
Sweden to be the  predominant form of  occurrence in
fish. Cold vapor or flameless atomic absorption is most
commonly used for total mercury determination, while
the Westb'6 procedure (6) appears  quite  reliable  for
determination   of  methylmercury.  An  international
collaborative study  (sponsored  by  the  Society  for
Analytical Chemistry and the AOAC) is in progress  and
should establish the degree of reliability  of the various
mercury methods involved. A comprehensive report on
surveys of mercury in fish and other foods  was presented
at the recent meeting  of the AOAC by  Simpson  and
Horwitz (7). I shall summarize that  presentation briefly.
It  involves  typical  application   of the  combined
approaches  of  total diet and  individual  commodity
surveillance. It  also exemplifies the analytical  problems
in trace  metal monitoring of the food  supply and in
evaluation  of  the  toxicological effects. The survey of
canned tuna was undertaken  by FDA in cooperation
with the  National Canners Association  and the National
Oceanographic  and Atmospheric Administration.  The
results showed that about 4 percent of the more than
2000 samples  examined exceeded the  FDA  action
guideline of 0.5 ppm, the average being  0.25 ppm. It was
also  shown  that the larger the fish the higher was  the
average mercury level and the  proportion exceeding  the
guideline. A similar observation was made with respect
to Pacific  halibut  by  the  National Marine  Fisheries
Service.
  FDA undertook a survey of  swordfish as well as of 19
other species  of  commercial  fish  and  shellfish.  The
extensive findings 95 percent  of high levels  of mercury
in swordfish exceeding the action guideline of 0.5 ppm
necessitated the FDA  ban  on  swordfish distribution
(Table 1). In contrast, of the 19 other  species surveyed
(Table 2), only 4 (bonita, cod, mackerel, and snapper)
showed a significant percentage exceeding the guideline
(Table 3). In these cases  the analytical method employed
was  the  cold  vapor atomic  absorption method  of  the
Fisheries  Research  Board  of  Canada  or  a  similar
procedure  (8).  In  addition,  in  cooperation  with  45
states,  the  Tennessee  Valley  Authority,  and   the
Environmental Protection Agency, surveys of fish from
fresh water fishing areas throughout the  Unites States
were  completed.  About 40  percent  of all samples
examined exceeded the 0.5 ppm guideline. Closure of
fishing areas and/or warnings  against eating fish taken
from polluted waters were  issued by  16 of the states
covered in  the  survey.  Import samples of freshwater
species showed about the same proportion (45 percent)
containing excessive mercury.
   TABLE 1  DISTRIBUTION OF Hg  LEVELS IN
              SWORDFISH ABOVE 0.5 ppm
              GUIDELINE
ppm Hg found % of total samples
0.50-0.74
0.75-0.99
1.00-1.24
1.25-1.49
1.50-1.99
2.00-2.99
> 3.00







13.7
33.2
26.5
15.3
8.5
2.4
0.3
TABLE 2 SEAFOOD ANALYZED FOR Hg
Bonita
Clams
Cod
Crab
Flounder
Haddock
Hake
Halibut
Herring
Lobster
Mackerel
Oysters
Perch
Salmon
Sardines
Scallops
Snapper
Trout
Whitefish

-------
                                                                         MONITORING - FOOD
                                                 155
     TABLE 3  SEAFOOD WITH X).5ppmHg
Type
Bonita
Cod
Mackerel
Snapper
Mean ppm
0.30
0.09
0.12
0.31
%> .5 ppm
10
3
3
18
TABLE 4 NAA FOR MERCURY IN FOODSTUFFS
(ppb)
Commodity
Flour
NF Dry milk
Sugar
Potatoes
Beef
Chicken
Shrimp
Beef liver
Eggs
Whole milk
No. samples
28
33
22
33
23
24
32
22
33
23
Median
<3
10
<3
3
3
3
14
3
<2
<1
Range
<3-6
<4-27
<3-10
<1-15
<2-7

-------
156
CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
                             TABLE 5  NAA FOR MERCURY IN TOTAL DIETS

                                                    Mercury cone, (ppb): 1972
rooa nem
Dairy products
Meat, fish, poultry
Grain, cereal producl
Polatoes
Leafy vegetable
Legume vegetable
Root vegetable
Garden fruits
Fruits
Bait.
<1
30
3
3
5*
<2
2
2
<2
Bos.
<1
27*
8*
8*
5*
<1
<1
2
2
K.C.
<1
8*
5
2
3*
<2
<1
<1
3*
Minn.
3
9
<2
3
<1
<1
<1
<1
<1
L. A.
2
27
< 2
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
< 1
                         *Avg. values.

 animals. A special problem was  posed by the desire to
 study localization of mercury residues in discrete sections
 of rat brains following ingestion of methylmercury. Only
 a  few milligrams of sample could be supplied, but by
 utilizing NAA we were able to supply the required data.
 For the hundreds of blood analyses required, fortunately
 the rapid Magos procedure (13) has proved reliable.
   I have chosen to devote what  may seem an excessive
 proportion of  time  to  the mercury problem. This is,
 partially, because more information  is available on the
 analytical  methodology and on  the  occurrence of
 mercury in foods. But  more significantly, as indicated
 earlier,  the  experience  with mercury illustrates  the
 gamut  of analytical problems to be anticipated in the
 monitoring of trace metals.
   There is need for practicable methods of adequate
 sensitivity to monitor individual food commodities; for
 methods of a sensitivity an order of magnitude better to
 monitor composite total diet  categories of commodities;
 for methods applicable to determination of the normal
 background level of  the metal in foods; for methods for
 identification and determination  of the various forms in
 which a toxic metal residue occurs in foods; for practical
 methods applicable to the often minute samples that are
 the  only ones available in  lexicological  studies; for
 automated  methods to facilitate analysis  of a  large
 number of samples.  Necessary to, and perhaps eclipsing,
 all of the preceding is the need for studies of methods of
 sample preparation and sample dissolution or reduction
 to  make the products amenable  to   the  ultimate
 determinative phase  without loss of the toxic residue or
 adventitious contamination of the  sample. There is also
 need to be extremely cautious to avoid arousing undue
 public  alarm and pressure to  undo fictitious knots with
 consequent diversion of limited resources from  really
 critical problems.  As we face the broader monitoring
 problem, it is obvious that we are also in need of reliable
 multielement methods.
   In recognition of the prevasiveness and possible health
 hazard   of  many  metal residues,  FDA lexicologists
                                            developed  a  list  of  metallic  elements posing  or
                                            potentially  posing  a  problem  in  groups  in  an
                                            approximate order of decreasing estimated significance
                                            (Table 6). It should  be pointed out that some elements
                                            within a group may  be included not in relation to their
                                            intrinsic degrees of toxicity but in relation to the effect
                                            of  their  presence on the  toxicity  of other  elements
                                            therein; for example, in the first group, zinc is included
                                            because of the significance of the zinc-cadmium ratio to
                                            the toxicity   of  cadmium.  Beyond these,  FDA  is
                                            concerned with Ni, Co, V, Mn, Mo and up to a total of
                                            twenty or more metals occurring in the  environment,
                                            the forms, concentrations, and lexicological significance
                                            of which are virtually unknown. This broad spectrum of
                                            metals, in conjunction with the  variety of analytical
                                            needs cited, has posed a monumental task which neither
                                            FDA nor any other  organization has adequate resources
                                            in personnel and equipment to  complete as soon as is
                                            desirable. In the face of the urgent need and the lack of
                                            enough chemists experienced in trace metal analysis in
                                            foods,  FDS is undertaking  to  expedite progress  by
                                            reassigning a cadre of chemists from other important but
                                            lower  priority  projects  to  work with  those  experts
                                            available  in  methods  development; soliciting  outside
                                            contract support  both  in  studies of  potential
                                            multielement  techniques  for the metals of  primary
                                            concern and in evaluation of any  existing methodology
                                            for metals of secondary concern in  application to food
                                            analysis; and utilizing, as available, methods recognized
                                            as of less than  adequate  sensitivity, to undertake total
                                            diet and  individual  commodity  surveillance in order to
                                            avoid repetition of the mercury experience, that is, the
                                            failure  to discover an existing excessive contamination
                                            situation while resources are all devoted to refinement of
                                            techniques.

                                                TABLE 6  METALS  OF CURRENT CONCERN

                                               GP    I  -  Pb,   Hg,  Cd,   As,  Se,  Zn
                                               GP   II  -  Be,   Ge,  Sb,   Tl,  Cu,  Cr,  Sn

-------
                                                                         MONITORING - FOOD
                                                157
  A special problem of concern  is the hazard due to
migration of toxic metals from glazed pottery into food.
Primary attention has been given to contamination by
lead and cadmium. The test procedure for the leachable
metals involves exposure of the vessels to acetic acid and
determination  of the extracted lead and cadmium by
atomic absorption spectrometry. A field  surveillance
program  has  revealed  few  instances where  domestic
products have exceeded the interim action guidelines of
7  ppm leachable  lead  and  of 0.5  ppm  leachable
cadmium, but these have been exceeded by a significant
proportion  of imported pottery. A limited survey of
cadmium leachable from enamelware again has revealed
no problem with domestic products, but about one-third
of the imports exceeded the interim guideline during the
past year.
  Another  problem  of  special  concern has  been
occurrence in evaporated milk of higher than  tolerable
levels of lead. This is, of course, a matter of particular
significance  because of its extensive  use in  infant
formulas and because of evidence that young children
absorb and retain lead more readily than do adults^ In
order to evolve a reliable method  foFThe determination
of lead in evaporated milk, FDA in cooperation with
industry laboratories  undertook a collaborative study of
an  atomic absorption  and  of  an anodic  stripping
voltammetric procedure (14). The results by atomic
absorption at levels of 0.16 ppm and above, including
the range of special interest up to 0.27 ppm, were quite
satisfactory. Insufficient results have been received for
evaluation  of  the  electrochemical  method,  but
preliminary results indicate it  may prove superior at
levels below  0.16 ppm. Meanwhile, the industry has
made much progress in modifying can closure solders to
reduce the contamination.
  In addition to the  cited mercury determination using
flameless atomic  absorption spectrometry  (8), the
following  analytical  procedures  have  been
collaboratively studied and  adopted as  Official, First
Action by the AOAC in 1971 and 1972:
  Lead in evaporated milk (14)
  Lead in fish (15)
  Lead in plant and animal products (16)
  Lead  and  cadmium  leached  from  glazed ceramic
  surfaces (17)
  Cadmium in foods (18)
  Meanwhile  FDA studies  are  in  progress  on
multielement  methods  for mercury, arsenic,  and
selenium in total diet  samples  by NAA; on mercury,
arsenic, selenium,  cadmium,  and  lead  in individual
commodities  by atomic absorption spectrometry; or
lead, zinc, cadmium, tin, and copper in commodities by
anodic stripping voltammetry; and  on cadmium, zinc,
and  copper  in  toxicological samples (ppb  range) by
atomic absorption spectrometry utilizing the heated
graphite atomizer accessory.
  In conjunction with  contract  work  to  extend and
expedite coverage of  the  problem  on the  metals  of
current concern, a preliminary limited service contract
has issued for study the applicability to food analysis,
for some  twelve  or  more  metals, of the  technique  of
radio  frequency-induced  plasma  excitation  emission
spectrometry. Depending on the results of that study, it
is  being recommended by the Office of Science that a
full-scale contract  proposal be solicited for such work.
Similar recommendations are being made for study  of
the  applicability  to food  and  biological materials  of
existing  methodology  for  beryllium,  germanium,
antimony,  thallium, copper, tin,  and chromium. The
objective  is  to select  the best immediately available
procedures for use in initial surveillance and for further
refinement as necessary.
  During the current fiscal year surveillance programs
will be instituted on mercury, lead, and cadmium in fish;
on cadmium in a variety  of foods;  and  on mercury,
arsenic, selenium, lead, cadmium, and zinc in total diet
samples. Although the current procedures for the total
diet  analysis are not  of the ultimate sensitivity required,
the  program  will  serve  to disclose  any  serious
contamination problems.

THE BUSINESS AHEAD
  It  is apparent  from  the  foregoing  that a  most
formidable task still faces  us in  the development  of
methodology and an even greater one in respect  to the
chronic toxicity  and  interactions of the less familiar
metals.  The  relationship  between  the  analytical
requirements  and  the  toxicological needs  seems
inevitably to end  up in  the  old  chicken-or-the-egg
conundrum. The chemist asks what analytical sensitivity
the toxicologist requires and the latter asks how much  of
the  metal is there!  Fortunately,  the  advent of the
National Center for  Toxicological Research will greatly
expedite the setting of the goals which the analytical
chemist must achieve. During the next fiscal year we
anticipate  that we should  be able to develop enough
surveillance  data  to disclose  any patently  significant
unrecognized contamination of the food supply by the
metals listed in Groups  I and II above. If fiscal year 1973
contract resources exceed  our anticipated minimum it
should  be possible  to similarly deal with  all of the
twenty or so metals of potential concern.
  The  special problems must engage our attention very
soon. One is  a large scale survey of the diet of inner city
children for lead, to permit evaluation of the significance
to the  elevated lead  levels in  their blood of dietary
intake in  relation to  known adventitious sources
(automobile  emissions, lead paints,  lead water pipes).
Another problem relates to the significance to the diet
contamination of the use of sewage sludge as fertilizer in
growing crops and forage. A preliminary investigation of
such use in  the Chicago Sanitary District revealed that
soybeans  so  cultivated  contained up  to  1 ppm  of
cadmium. It is apparent that a survey of the extent and

-------
158
CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
consequences of that agricultural practice is essential.
  How short a time it seems since analytical chemistry,
and particularly elemental analysis, was being relegated
to that class of routine operations offering no  more
creative challenge!  Only now  are we  beginning to
appreciate that we   didn't  know  enough  about the
problems to even recognize them  and that  seemingly
inert and innocuous substances can be facilely converted
in the biosphere to potent hazards.
REFERENCES
  1. Schachter, M. M., JAOAC 49, 778, 1966.
  2. Pappas, E. G., and L. A. Rosenberg, ibid., 49, 778,
       1966.
  3. Pappas, E. G., and L. A. Rosenberg, ibid., 49, 782,
       1966.
  4. Corneliussen, P.  C., Pesticide Monitoring J., 2, 140,
       1969.
  5. Duggan, R. J., and F. J. McFarland,ibid, 1,1, 1967.
  6. Westoo, G., Acta Chem, Scand., 21, 1790, 1967.
  7. Simpson,  R.  E., and  W.  Horwitz,  86th Annual
       Meeting  of the AOAC, Washington, D. C., Oct.
       9-12,1972.
                                           8. Munns, R. K.,  and D. C. Holland, JAOAC 54, 202,
                                                1971.
                                           9. Jervis,  R. E.,  D. Debrun,  W.  LePage, and  B.
                                                Fiefenbach, National Health Grant Project No.
                                                605-7-510,  University of  Toronto, Canada,
                                                Progress Report, July 1970.
                                         10. Somers, E., Proceedings  of the Symposium, Mercury
                                                in Man's Environment, Royal Society of Canada,
                                                Ottawa, 1971.
                                         11. Kolbye, Jr., A. C., Science 175,1192,1972.
                                         12. Tanner, J. T., M. H. Friedman, D. N. Lincoln, L. A.
                                                Ford, and M. Jaffee, ibid., 177, 1102,  1972.
                                         13-Magos,  L., and T. W.  Clarkson, JAOAC 55, 966,
                                                1972.
                                         14. Moffitt,  R. A., G. E. Huskey, R. G. Scholz, R. J.
                                                Gajan, J. A.  Fiorino, and  A. Woodson, 86th
                                                Annual Meeting of the AOAC, Washington,D.C.,
                                                October 9-12,1972.
                                         15. Gajan, R. J. and D. Larry, JAOAC, 55, 727,1972.
                                         16. Hoover, W. L., ibid., 55, 737, 1972.
                                         17. Franco, V. and B. Krinitz, 86th Annual Meeting of
                                                the  AOAC, Washington, D. C.,  October 9-12,
                                                1972.
                                         18. Gajan, R.  J., J. H. Gould, J.  O. Watts, and J. A.
                                                Fiorino, ibid.

-------
       DIMENSIONS  OF  MONITORING
            R. P. OUELLETTE AND J. W. OVERBEY II
                       The MITRE Corporation
                          McLean,  Virginia
INTRODUCTION
  The purpose of this presentation is to ask questions,
not  to  provide  answers. Our  hope is that by  the
presentation of half-baked ideas we can stimulate the
thinking  of  the scientific community  toward  an
improved view of the environmental monitoring process.
  This will be a study of an extreme and a technical
caricature.  We  intend  to pollute your  mind. What
follows will be a series of random snapshots relevant to
the  concept  of monitoring the environment  of  our
nation.
  A guiding principle and a pervasive note throughout
this presentation is the following. Monitoring networks
yield  vast  amounts  of raw  data  which  must  be
transformed into usable information  by a  filtering
process  which  generally involves a complex transfer
               PERCEPTION
                                    function.  This is  of paramount importance since
                                    monitoring systems  exist  in  support of the decision
                                    making process for recommending actions. This process
                                    feeds  on information    not  data. For  monitoring
                                    networks  to  provide the  pertinent  information,  we
                                    must adopt a  systems approach  in designing  these
                                    networks.

                                    THE ENVIRONMENT SYSTEM
                                      One often hears that no systematic approach is applied
                                    to  the solution  of  our ever-changing  environmental
                                    problems. This lack of systems approach might result
                                    from the fact that we are dealing with a complex system
                                    which often follows no clearly predictable pattern.
                                      As illustrated  in  Figure  1, the total  environment
                                    includes all conceivable attributes and interactions in the
ASSESSMENT
                      EFFLUENTS
                                                    T
                                                    H
                                                    E
• AIR

  CONSTITUENTS
  PROPERTIES
  EVENTS





1 CONTROL 1
> *ruZ3:

• LEGAL <£
• SOCIAL -£/
. ^ECONOMIC S*
III CHANGES


^A ^PHYSICAL
7*X_ 0CHEMICAL
~. w • BIOLOGICAL
t
1 HUMAN
1 ACTIVITIES
1 T
CONSTRAINTS
1 NATURAL
1 RESOURCES
1

N


V

1
R
s~
• WATER

CONSTITUENTS
PROPERTIES
EVENTS
O
N
M
r
1
1
HUMAN
HEALTH
EFFECTS
1
1
1
SOCIO-
ECONOMIC
EFFECTS
1
MAN-MADE
RESOURCES
Kl
I
^
• LAND ^"
CONSTITUENTS
PROPERTIES
EVENTS
T

EXPOSURE TO
THE ENVIRONMENT









   MAJOR
   ECOLOGICAL
   CYCLES

   • H20
   • 02
   • CO2
   • N 2
   • MINERALS


!• NATURAL
   ECOSYSTEMS

   • TROPHIC LEVELS
   • SPECIES DIVERSITY
    SPECIES ABUNDANCE


 • AGRICULTURAL
   ECOSYSTEMS

   • YIELD
   • BLIGHT
                    Figure 1.  The total environment.
                                 159

-------
160
CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
universe. These are too all-encompassing to treat in a
comprehensive  way.  Therefore,  subportions  of  the
environment are usually selected for study since only by
creating such partitions can any element be described
easily.
MULTIMEDIA ASPECTS OF POLLUTION
  When the environment is partitioned for  study, we
often fail to remember that many pollutants move from
one media  to another in a  circular fashion as part of a
natural geocycle or they are  forced by the control action
of men. Pollutant control programs must consider these
interactions so as not to remove pollutants from the air,
for example, only  to put the  waste into a stream or to
dump it thoughtlessly on the land (Figure 2).
              WEATHER
              PLUME DISPERSION ,

              PARTICLE FALLOUT
                DIFFUSION. AND REACTION
              WASHOUT Br
  LAND

  SOLID WASTE

  RU N-O FF
  EROSION
              WATER

              BIO-DEGR A DA BLE EFFLUENTS
              NUTRIENTS

              SEDIMENT
   Figure 2. Interaction of pollutants with the three
            environmental phases.
  We live in a closed system and we can safely conclude
that   entorpy  is  ever increasing.   This  leads  to a
seemingly natural conclusion that we cannot  eliminate
pollution, and  that our  chosen actions  result  from
considering  the  pollutant  side  effects  of  many
alternatives and then selecting the action having the least
effective form of pollution in the  least dangerous media.
Are   we  then  faced  with  a  situation  where  the
effectiveness   of our  control  technology will
systematically fall behind because of population growth
and industrialization?
  The situation so depicted is not hopeless. We can learn
to live in a polluted world. We will have breakthrough in
technology; but,  more important, we can slow down and
even reverse the  process. Some of the options include,
but are not limited to, product or process changes and
energy demand  curtailment.  Information  needed  to
guide  these policy  decisions and  to evaluate  their
effectiveness is  provided  by environmental  monitoring
systems.
MONITORING PURPOSES
  We see  at least four basic types of monitoring systems
currently in use (Figure 3).
l.A  surveillance  system for enforcement actions  in
   support  of compliance and regulatory activities; this
   tends to be a source monitoring system;
2. An  administrative system using  environmental data
   for planning, budgeting, and assessing the impact  of
   control programs;
3. An ambient monitoring system measuring the  status
   of  the environment  containing a baseline subsystem
   and an early warning  subsystem. This early warning
   subsystem monitors short-lived phenomena or episode
   and trends;
4. Lastly,  a research and  scientific  system aimed  at
   supporting effects studies and mathematical modeling.
   This  system supports research activities which are
   usually  established  on  a  specific  problem  basis,
   including the identification  of new  pollutants, the
   in-depth  study  of  problem  areas, and the
   establishment of cause-effect relationships.
  A great number of variations and refinements can be
conceived.  We believe that the above taxonomy will be
useful in the following discussion.
  Data  collected  by  means of  monitoring programs
provide  the  raw  data  translatable  into  valuable
information for:
1. The continuing assessment of the effect of pollutants
   and pollution on man, the natural  and the modified
   environment.
2. The  detailed  study  of  pollutant  formation,
   interactions, synergisin, and patterns.
3. The  development,  establishment,  review, and
   enforcement  of criteria,  ambient   standards, and
   industry performance standards.
4. The evaluation of the effectiveness of adopted control
   procedures and  preventive measures (control devices,
   institutional modifications, monies, etc.).
5. Planning resources used  and  product and  process
   changes in order to  minimize environmental impact.
6. Defining the need, direction, and intensity of future
   research programs.
CHARACTERISTICS OF MONITORING SYSTEMS
  In spite of the fact that we have identified at least four
types of monitoring systems, the  tendency is to use
similar instrumentation,  techniques, and procedures  in
all cases. The result is that the objective of none of these
                      UNIVERSE
                                           ADMINISTRATIVE
                                              SCIENTIFIC
                                                                                   ENFORCEMENT
                                                  Figure 3. Overlap in monitoring systems.

-------
                                                            ENVIRONMENTAL FORECASTING
                                                                     161
^Sv~\A T T R 1 B U T E S
SYSTEM ^^x.
SCIENTIFIC
ADMINISTRATIVE
ENFORCEMENT
AMBIENT
GRID SIZE
RESOLUTION OR
AREA COVERAGE
SMALL
LARGE
LOCALIZED
MEDIUM
ORIENTATION
GRADIENT
AMBIENT
SOURCE
AMBIENT
ACCURACY
MAX
M IN
M ED
MED
COVERAGE
(SPACE- TIME)
SPECIFIC
SYSTEMATIC
BIASED
SYSTEMATIC
DURATION
SHORT TERM
LONG TERM
SHORT TERM
SHORT &
LONG TERM
RESPONSE
LONG
IN-BETWEEN
SHORT
INTERMEDIATE
                              Figure 4. Characteristics of monitoring systems.
monitoring programs is satisfied in an optimal fashion.
Figure 4 shows some important attributes for each of
the four types of monitoring systems previously defined.
The idea is not to provide a comparative analysis of the
different systems, but  to  convey  the  wide range of
attributes and the far reaching consequences of such
requirements.
THE MONITORING PROCESS
  Figure 5 identifies some  important considerations at
each step of the monitoring process; from the original
concept to the end use of the information obtained. The
attempt is not to provide a catalog or a check list, even
though this would be a worthwhile project, but rather to
indicate that a dynamic re-evaluation of each and every
monitoring system, network, and project is called for in
the light of the concepts identified in Figure 5.
MEW A AND POLLUTANT EFFECTS
  Media  and  pollutants,  because  of  their varying
characteristics,  often  define to  a  large extent the
monitoring  concepts selected and the instrumentation
used,  as  well as the  method of  data  analysis and
presentation.
  For example, Figure 6, fluid media move at varying
speeds and are at least three dimensional. The velocity,
temperature, and natural or induced stratification of the
                     fluid  seems to  collaborate closely  in  inhibiting the
                     attempts of the  investigator to collect a meaningful
                     sample. The area sustained by the sensor is an ill defined
                     space in terms of volume and boundary. This  condition
                     frequently  exists to the  point  of rendering analysis
                     technically impossible.
                       The  environment   or the  presence  (known  or
                     unknown) of modifying factors including chemical and
                     biological actions and reactions in a sample are especially
                     relevant.  This  is particularly  true  in  the  case  of
                     integrated or grab samples. The presence of texture is an
                     additional complicating variable.
                       Obviously, the measurement of rare populations, trace
                     pollutant, or extreme values must  be approached in a
                     different manner  than the ubiquitous pollutants which
                     have more or less constant concentration values that lie
                     in the middle  of the operating range of the measuring
                     device.
                       The monitoring network designer must surmount the
                     difficulties  imposed  by  the   pollutant  and  media
                     characteristics  before   the  network  can become
                     operational and provide data.
                     SYSTEM QUALITY ASSURANCE CONSIDERATIONS
                       We have accumulated and computerized vast stores of
                     environmental measurements. Environmental monitoring
                     networks are growing as rapidly as pollution itself. Still,

PURPOSE




ORIENTATION SPECIFICITY
RESOLUTION SENSITIVITY
DURATION ACCURACY
TIMELINESS INTERFERENCES
	 MFA1IIPFMFNT

SCALE
RANGE
PRECISION
RELIABILITY

REP


RESENTATION



QUALITY CONTROL ACCEPTABILITY
REFERENCE STD

COMMONALTY
COMPATIBILITY
  COVERAGE
                MEDIA
    • SPATIAL
    • TEMPORAL
    • FUNCTIONAL
MAINTAINABILITY  EDITING
CALIBRATION      VALIDATION
                  PROCESSING
                   UTILITY
                   IMPACT

                   PLANNING
                   MANAGEMENT

DOCUMENTATION   ENFORCEMENT
                   STANDARD
                                    Figure 5. The monitoring process.

-------
162
           CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
              OBSERVATIONS

              STAGNANT/TURBITY/DEPTH/LOW FLOW

              DECAY-BACTERIA/LEACHING

              DEPTH/VEGETATION EFFECT/MATRIX/TEXTURE

              OBSERVATIONS

              RARE OCCURRENCE
              SIZE/REACTIVITY
              RANGE  OF CONCENTRATION
      AIR
FLUIDS WATER

SOLID WASTE

SOIL/1AND

POLLUTANT

METALS
PARTICULATE
S02
  Figure 6. Media and pollutants define the monitoring
          system to be selected.

when we review our  achievement (as scientists) in the
field  of monitoring,  we are left unsatisfied with the
result.
  We venture to  diagnose  that  a  lack  of systems
approach to data  acquisition and verification is at the
root  of  our problems.  Figure 7 is an  attempt  at
introducing  order  in  monitoring  system design
considerations.
Acquisition
  Siting knowledge is one  of  the limiting factors in
monitoring  systems.  If the  accuracy  desired and the
range of the  parameters are known, it is easy to estimate
the required  number  of  stations per unit area. The
  technique  usually  used  is  an  inverse  t-test.
  Unfortunately, findings from such studies have shown
  that the number of stations required is usually beyond
  economic  and  logistic  feasibility.  Mobile and/or
  moveable stations appear to be a method, with some loss
  of information,  to  increase  the virtual number of
  stations almost infinitely.
    The grid size or the interstation distance can be fine or
  large. Equally important, the grid can be systematic, that
  is every point of a virtual projected lattice is occupied by
  a station,  or it can be totally random or  biased to
  measure a specific source or a specific stream localized in
  space and  time.  Systematic sampling can be  through a
  uniform or exhaustive  enumerative approach, or it can
  use the transect approach.
    Rules of thumb  are available to assist in the location
  of sampling  stations in terms of  height  above  a fixed
  level (example, sea level, ground, etc.)  as well as for
  avoiding  the  effects  of interferences (man-made
  structure,   lake,  source). Unfortunately, selection  of
  sampling station  siting has been  in the past dictated  by
  the availability of specialized facilities. For instance, it is
  not known to this day how many air quality monitoring
  stations located on  flat  rooftop fire stations essentially
  record a carbon  monoxide  time  series  generated by
                ACQUISITION
 SYSTEM
 DESIGN
 CONSIDERATIONS
                                          SITING
                                      SAMPLING"
                                      DESIGN
                                                       EXTENT
                                                       GRID
                                                                     NUMBER OF STATIONS
                                                                     MOBILITY
                                                      HEIGHT
                                                     LOCATION-
                                                     PLATFORM-
                                                                     RANDOM       TRANSECT
                                                                     BIASED
                                                                     ABOVE GROUND/WATER
                                                                     IN GROUND/WATER
                                                                     ABOVE SEA LEVEL
                                                                     SOURCE
                                                                     AMBIENT
                                                                     BACKGROUND
                                                                     INSITU
 FIXED
 ,TIME
 INTERVAL

 VARIABLE
•TIME
.INTERVAL
                                                                     REMOTE
                                                              ^CONTINUING
                                                                 PERIODIC
                                                               /PROPORTIONAL,
                                                              ^-THRESHOLD
                                                              ^SEQUENTIAL
                                                                ^SPORADIC
-FIXED INTERVAL
-NESTED
-CROSSED
-AMPLITUDE
^VARIANCE
                                                                   VARIABLE
                  VERIFICATION
                                           CALIBRATION
                                                      .UNIT
                                                               ORDINAL
                                                     /"""  ^-CARDINAL
                                      STANDARDS^-CERTIFICATION-ROUND ROBIN
                                                    ^REFERENCE
                             Figure 7. System quality assurance considerations.

-------
                                                              ENVIRONMENTAL FORECASTING
                                                 163
trucks responding to fire alarms rather than the ambient
carbon monoxide level.
  The first order and generally the gross level criteria of
location will  usually be decided by the purpose of the
monitoring   program which  include  background,
ambient,  or  source  monitoring. The more  detailed
question of measuring  in-situ or from a remote  site
(whether a few feet away, a plane, a balloon, a satellite)
is  complicated by the  fact  that the  distribution  of
pollution  is  nonuniform within  the media.  Remote
sensing  usually  measures total  burden, a  column  of
pollutant (example, from the  ground to the platform),
but can also be used to  take slice measurement across a
volume.
  Let us turn now to the sampling design.  We see this
concept  being  dominated  by temporal aspects: time
interval between measurement, averaging, or integration
time and eventually reporting time. The interval between
measurements can  be  fixed  or  variable. Fixed time
intervals are commonly used by continuous and periodic
sampling devices. A  host of other options result when
variable time intervals are  considered.  These  sampling
schemes, which are not  currently  in extensive use, offer
many advantages in  minimizing cost, storage,  and data
requirements. The idea of proportional sampling is to
gear the sampling rate to such  characteristics of  the
signal as variation,  amplitude,  or a combination thereof.
Threshold or  alarm sampling is based  on the concept of
collecting  and  transmitting   data  only if the  signal
monitored  moves outside preset high or low boundaries.
Sequential sampling consists of sampling a parameter or
signal until some  limit  or  condition is satisfied. The
sporadic sampling  category includes  much of today's
unplanned monitoring efforts.
  It is  our  belief that the  averaging time   used in
acquiring  and reporting  environmental data should be
consistent with published standards. Except in the case
of specialized research projects, the use of averaging time
of less than one hour does not appear to be warranted
by the gain in information.

Verification
  Without a  proper  and  systematic  verification
procedure, any monitoring program is without  scientific
value and probably  inadequate  for  enforcement  or
administrative  purposes.  A  satisfactory  verification
system  is  quite complex.  We will  cover only a few
representative ideas here.
  A standard  or  reference  method  should   be
operationally defined in  terms of sampling procedures,
equipment, sample handling, a laboratory testing (round
robin),  published  and  promulgated  by  a regulatory
group.  A  need  exists  for  a clear-cut procedure  for
certification of  new standards  and  comparison with
existing ones. A standard method should have, at least,
the  following characteristics:
     Utility
  •  Reliability
  •  Maintainability
  •  Low Cost
  •  Sensitivity
  •  Specificity
  Environment parameters are given in a variety of units
(example, ppm, jiig/m3, COH/1000 linear feet) and on
ordinal,  cardinal,  and interval scales. If standardized
units and scales  cannot be set, and if it is desirable that
they are, then  standardized accurate and unambiguous
methods by  converting values among those units and
scales which  are employed are imperative. Some efforts
have been started to standardize units. The rate at which
these initial efforts are adopted must be accelerated and
require  the support  of  both individual  governmental
agencies and scientists engaged in research.
  The previous chart (Figure 7) suggests many criteria
by  which  monitoring programs should  be evaluated
during  planning, development, and utilization phases.
Consideration of the factors shown here  is essential for
effective design of monitoring systems.
DIMENSIONS REDUCTION
  Because cost is often proportional to the number of
stations, the number of analyses, and/or the number of
computations, every attempt should be made in reducing
dimensions. Cost considerations are not the only reasons
why the  dimension must  be reduced. In order for policy
makers to reach timely and effective decisions regarding
alternative  strategies, the monitoring program must be
designed and operated subject to the ultimate system
user's requirements.  The size of the  problem can be
reduced during data collection, measurements, analyses,
and presentations (Figure 8).
Collection
  Reductions  in the  amount of data  collected are
possible  within the  areal  and  temporal  aspects of
collection.  An example of an areal collection technique
which  rapidly provides the minimum  amount  of
information required for  a decision is  illustrated by the
topologically optimum  water-sampling plan for  rivers
and  streams  described  by  W. E.  Sharp.  This is a
procedure that optimizes  the search for sources of newly
discovered  pollutants  and  will locate  water  quality
monitoring stations  according to a uniform plan. The
centroid  of a drainage network is located to divide the
basin into  two  parts of  equal magnitude. Samples  are
taken on both sides of the centroid and analyzed before
taking the  next  sample so that one-half of the network
could be rejected  on the basis of the  analysis. Similar
sampling occurs around the centroids  of remaining
portions until the source is located.
  The  applicability  of  this  technique   for  isolating
pollutant sources in other media should be considered in
the design  of monitoring networks whose objective is
enforcement  of regulations.  Modifications  of the
technique  might be  required  to  account  for  special

-------
164
           CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
                                        CU  VA  CD
                                    CU
                                            XX
                                            XX
                                                XX
1. ACQUISITION              -^  ,£-

 • TOPOLOGICAUY SEQUENTIAL  X\



2. MEASUREMENT

 •CORRELATION/REGRESS ION
               APPROACH

3. ANALYSES

 • BATCH PARTITIONING  APPROACH

4. PRESENTATION

 •INDICATORS/INDICES
           Figure 8. Dimension reduction.

segments  of the  monitor/pollutant/media/objective
characteristics.
  Examples of  temporal  data  collection  techniques
which provide a sufficient  number  of samples  to
estimate  pollutant  concentrations  within preset
confidence limits are illustrated by analysis conducted
by  W. F. Hunt, Jr. and by the study of D. E. Phinney
and J.  E.  Newman.  These  procedures specify  the
frequency of air monitoring necessary to characterize air
pollution for a given time period and area to a given
confidence interval. Conversely, the precision associated
with preset sampling frequencies can be derived so the
effectiveness  of  alternative  plans  under  anticipated
operational conditions can be examined.
Measurement
  Another  method  of reducing the dimensionality of
data   while  still  obtaining   maximum  available
information is  demonstrated by  employing  the laten
structure of correlations  matrices to infer unmeasured
pollutant  concentrations.  For example,  based on  the
knowledge  of cross correlations between pollutants or
correlation with  a third variable  (example, population;
number  of cars),  it  is  possible  by  measuring  one
pollutant  of  generally less  than  m  to predict  the
concentration  of  other correlated pollutants  by using
such statistical methods as regression analysis.
Analysis
  Various techniques exist  for reducing the number of
analyses needed to confirm, for example, the presence of
a trace metal  or  to identify where it occurred.  These
techniques  can generally be classified into group-testing
methods.  In  these methods, analysis is made  on a
composite sample formed by  combining a small portion
of each sample. If a negative result is obtained, it can be
concluded that none of the samples have the pollutant
under investigation. If a positive result is obtained, then
at least one of the  samples  contains  the pollutant.  A
second analysis  is  then  performed,  usually on  two
composite  subsamples.  The process continues until  a
conclusion  can  be  drawn for  all original  samples.
Modifications  to  the   batching  method  involve  the
number  of composite  subsamples  formed  and  the
number of original samples included in the individual
composite. These modifications affect the rate at which
a conclusion can be formed for  the population of all
original samples by determining the number of successive
analysis which must be performed.
Presentation
  To  obtain a total view  of  our  environment we are
required, even forced, to conceive and measure a finite,
but  very large  number,  of pollutants or  residuals
associated with human activities. An equally lengthy list
would  be  required  to characterize the  natural
environment.
  Reduction  in the  presentation  dimensionality  is
necessitated by the vastness of the number of pollutants
and the limited ability of the investigator to comprehend
the net  effect of simultaneous  changes in individual
pollutants.
  Indicators  have  been  developed in  the  past  by
employing  simple  deterministic  models  of variable
relationships.  A  more  powerful  tactic would  apply
multivariate statistical methodology, such  as  principal
component   analysis  and  canonical  correlation, to
effectively reduce the dimensionality of the presentation
manifold.

PURPOSE OF MONITORING SYSTEMS
  If we need  a  taxonomy of monitoring systems, the
most  meaningful appears  to be according to purpose.
Three broad intents in monitoring programs are almost
exclusively and exhaustively covered by a separation in
normative, forecastive, and causative monitoring (Figure
9).
                                                        •NORMATIVE
                                                       • FORECASTING
                                                       • CAUSATIVE
                CURRENT STATUS

                HISTORICAL TRENDS

                PREDICTION

                REACTION

                MECHANISMS

                INTERACTION
BACKGROUND
AMBIENT
SOURCE

POINT
INTERVAL
TREND
                                                         Figure 9.  Types of monitoring systems by purpose.

                                                         Normative can be redefined as descriptive. It either
                                                       describes the current status or past historical trends and
                                                       is  used  for  background  definition,  ambient
                                                       environmental qualification, and source characterization.
                                                         The   causative  or  correlative  monitoring  concept
                                                       attempts   to  reach  fundamental  issues  involving
                                                       mechanisms, interactions, and action reactions.
                                                         Forecastive monitoring  is essentially a simultaneous

-------
                                                            ENVIRONMENTAL FORECASTING
                                               165
projection and prediction. This kind of monitoring is
often  biological  in essence  using  sentinel  species to
provide, because of their sensitivity, an alarm before the
chemical/physical  detectors  can  detect  the  effect or
presence  of environmental  stressors.  Forecastive
monitoring can be further broken down according to the
technique into statistical (prediction), biological (alarm),
and physical/chemical (precursor).

CONCLUDING REMARKS
  We would  like  to leave  you with  the  following
remarks extracted from the previous discussions:
1. Raw data are not information.
2. Pollution amount is not equivalent to  concentration.
  We must measure both.  Indeed  we  must learn to
  measure  amount,  concentration,  effective fraction,
  size  and  characteristic  distribution,  reactivity,
  accumulation, reaction, synergism, etc.
3. Pollution monitoring  is a study of  extremes from
  source emission to epidemiological studies.
4. The ultimate environmental  quality monitoring is an
  effect  monitor. Ideally   we need a personalized,
  portable, integrating, specific series of environmental
  monitors.
5.The quality  of environmental  monitoring  data  is
  defined by the  weakest link in the total monitoring
  process.
6. The greatest needs and the greater requirement for
  improvement should be in concepts of monitoring as
  we have tried to show here  today.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
  1. Arnold, J. C., A Markov  Sampling Policy Applied to
       Water  Quality Monitoring of Streams, Biometrics
       26 (4): 739-748,1970.
  2. Burton, J., et al., Guidelines for the  Acquisition of
      Validated Air Quality Data, MRT-6000, The
      MITRE Corporation, April 1971.
 3. Charlson, R. J., Note on the Design and Locations of
      Air  Sampling Devices, JAPCA  19 (10):  802,
      1969.
 4. Guidelines: Air Quality Surveillance Networks, EPA
      Pub No. AP-98.
 5. Hunt, Jr.,W.  F., The Precision Associated with the
      Sampling  Frequency of Log-Normally
      Distributed Air Pollutant  Measurements, JAPCA
      22(9)687-691,1972.
 6. Jenkins, D. W., Biological Monitoring of the Global
      Chemical  Environment,  Smithsonian Institute,
      Washington, D. C., June 1971.
 7. Osburn, H. S.,  L. J.  Lane, and J.  F. Hundley,
      Optimum Gaging of Thunderstorm Rainfall in
      South   Eastern  Arizona,  Water  Res.,   8  (1):
      253-265,1972.
 8. Overbey, J. W., and R. P. Ouellette, The Use of the
      National  Aerometric  Data Bank for Decision
      Making, M72-19,  The  MITRE  Corporation,
      October 1971.
 9. Phinney, D. E., and Jo E. Newman,  The Precision
      Associated with the Sampling Frequencies  of
      Total   Particulates  at  Indianapolis, Indiana,
      JAPCA 22 (9): 692-695,1972.
10. Saltzman,  Bernard E., Significance of Sampling Time
      in Air Monitoring,  JAPCA 20 (10): 660-665,
      1970.
11. Sharp,  W. E., A Topologically  Optimum Water
      Sampling  Plan for  Rivers and Streams, Water
      Res.,7(6): 1641-1646,1971.
12.Yamada, V.  M., Current  Practices  in Siting and
      Physical Design  of  Continuous Air Monitoring
      Stations, JAPCA 20 (4): 209-213,1970.

-------
            SESSION  V
ECONOMIC AND  LEGAL ASPECTS
                     Chairman:

                     G. Strasser
                     Battelle's Columbus Laboratories

-------
                     ECONOMIC  AND  LEGAL  ASPECTS
                                             G. STRASSER
                                   Battelle's Columbus Laboratories
                                            Columbus, Ohio
  I made a lisi of a few items to which I want to allude
 briefly.  If we look  at  the  so-called  environmental
 situation today, and I  avoid the term problems because
 of  the  makeup of the audience, we  look  at it  from
 different points of view. The economists, the scientists,
 the people, the  consumerists, and the advocates of
 consumerism, all have  views  of what the problems are.
 Perhaps  it's fair to say that fundamentally what we are
 talking  about when  we  discuss  problems of the
 environment is an internalization of externalized costs.
 By this  I mean many of our industrial products and
 services that we have been producing. The process itself
 has not absorbed the total cost of the activity but some
 of it has been externalized, either into our social or into
 our physical environment. As long as these social and
 physical sinks are not  saturated, but perhaps limitless,
 there is  no difficulty  with such externalization. When
 they begin to saturate,  the public gets frightfully excited
 about it. Then there is a  drive to see just exactly how
 much is  permissible to be discharged into the  physical or
 into the social environment which creates disruption. I
 think, in the opinion of many, we have reached a point
 where there is too much concern about this balance. We
 have a  movement  today of  how  to  improve  our
 environment, and to a large degree this improvement will
 depend on  how we  can reintroduce into the original
 costs much of the externalized costs. This is much easier
 said than done. If all of a sudden we set standards  that
 existed for the air or for  the river  200 years ago, it is
 perhaps fair to say that the majority of  our industries
 would be bankrupt overnight. Since much of what gets
 done today gets done with a  de facto understanding of
 cost externalization, the real  question  that  faces those
 who are  concerned with the environment is not whether
 or not something has to be done about the situation. I
 believe most would agree that we should do something.
 The real question is twofold. How to do it? And, second,
at what rate and in what manner should it be done? In
the  process we don't  want to create more  economic,
social, and other disruptions than the good we would do
by reversing this environmental trend. The things that
have  happened and evolved during decades, if  not
centuries, won't be re-written overnight. Therefore, the
real trick is how to evolve  the right mechanisms, the
right legal and other ancillary processes which will allow
us, in an expeditious  way  or manner  to correct the
situation.
  There are a number of intriguing anecdotes about the
difficulties of people who have tried to right  some of
these  wrongs.  I'm  sure everybody  in this audience is
familiar with the  Food and Drug  Administration and
with Dr. Herbert Ley who used to be its Director. I very
vividly recall a testimony  that he gave about three years
ago in front of the Dario subcommittee. H said we set
standards not based on physiological consequences as we
should, but based on what our chemists, who are getting
smarter and smarter by the year,  can do in terms of
detecting smaller and smaller  trace  elements  in
everything. If this trend is allowed to continue, he said,
pretty soon we will find everything in everything and we
will not be able to eat  anything.  He emphasized we
should  be trying to find a  proper cause and  effect
relationship between what we do and what its causes are;
we should differentiate between the risks that we as a
government impose upon the population, which the
population can do  very little about, and the risks that
people assume on  their own. In the former  category
would be foodstuff that people have to eat. This is, so to
speak, the government imposed risk. On the other hand,
if you want to go skiing in the Alps, and break your leg,
that  may  have a  greater  risk involved, but  that's
a personally selected risk.
  During the era when there  was a great deal of concern
about mercury in tuna, I was at OST. We all  had our
assignments, and  my  neighbor  got the assignment of
answering phone calls which went like this: What is OST
doing  about  mercury in tuna? Those  of you  in the
government can appreciate a flood of calls like that from
laymen. My neighbor at the office could take it only so
long. After a while he said: We bind up all the tuna and
are in the business of making thermometers. The job to
                                                  167

-------
168
CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
answer tuna questions was reassigned to someone else
the following day.
  As you can see, many things are happening in trying to
make this transition. I could rattle off a number of other
things  of which  you are most familiar, such as the
National  Environmental Policy Act of 1969. I'm sure
there is not a single individual in this room who doesn't
know about this and  about  the Environmental Impact
Analyses  and  the Environmental Impact  Statement.
Some say it is a new thing. Others asked what else is new
under the sun? We have  been doing some  of this before.
To what extent either of these statements is true I'm not
prepared  to  say. Some of you probably  know about a
new  law that was signed by the President two weeks ago
-  the Technology  Assessment  Act  of  1972.  This
Technology  Assessment  Act  is very intriguing because
there are a  great  many  commonalities — the subjects
overlap almost 90  percent the concerns of the National
Environmental Policy Act of  1969.
  Just  out of sheer conincidence I cam across something
which  I would like to share with you. It is an  act, and I
quote  slightly  paraphrased, which says every industrial
plant shall use the best practicable means of preventing
the discharge into the atmosphere of noxious gases and
other noxious  effluents arising -from their  work or of
rendering  such  effluents harmless when  discharged.
Which  of our two acts do you think this comes from?
I'm not asking for an answer. I want to tell you that this
is  an English  act, dated 1863, and  the Preamble is
slightly paraphrased.  An act  for  the more  effectual
disposal of industrial  wastes. Where it is expedient to
provide for the better disposal of industrial wastes, be it
enacted by the Queen's most excellent majesty, by and
with the  advice and consent of the lords, spiritual and
temporal and  common  in  the  present  Parliament
assembled,  and  by  the  authority  of the  same that
follows. The point I'm trying  to make is that a  lot of
people have been grappling with problems like this, and
nothing is  new  under  the   sun. The big  difference
between  what  has happened in  the  past and what is
                                           happening  now  is that we have saturated these things
                                           more than  we  saturated them in the  past, and  the
                                           leverage that technology permits us to exercise is much
                                           greater than it was in Queen Victoria's time. Therefore,
                                           if we do some good it could be much more than what we
                                           could do in the olden days. But if we foul up something,
                                           we can do a much better job of that too. So it's sort of
                                           important  to try  to  do  something  about it in  a
                                           systematic  way  without bankrupting  ourselves  in  the
                                           process. This leads me to say that in doing all this I think
                                           it's  imperative  that the  technical  people   and the
                                           engineers, who  are  so concerned with numbers and
                                           close-form solutions, whenever possible quote close-form
                                           second  order, partial  differential  equations  and
                                           operations research.
                                             I'd be the last one to  knock these  subjects, because
                                           I've been making my living at  them for a long time. But
                                           it's clear that other considerations have to enter into our
                                           deliberations.   Nowadays things   are not  as  easily
                                           modelable or simulatable as they have  been. You really
                                           have to see new institutional  frameworks and ways  in
                                           which we can come to grips with the problems facing us,
                                           even though the roots of many of them date back to
                                           1863 or before. In my  opinion  it would be nice if
                                           technical people  would get a better perspective about
                                           the historical, legal, traditional, and  other constraints
                                           within which these problems can be solved. And just to
                                           show that  I don't discriminate against the  technical
                                           people, I would  also dearly like to  have social  scientists
                                           be made to take courses like calculus appreciation. Then
                                           the discussion of multidisciplinary  problems, a first and
                                           second derivitive, and saturation curves and expedentials
                                           wouldn't come  to  them like  the rediscovery of the
                                           wheel. There are a  lot of things that  we  can  do as we
                                           approach these problems  in an interdisciplinary fashion.
                                           We must bring the  practitioners up to speed by giving
                                           them some contacts and background that they lack due
                                           to the kind  of education they receive.  This background
                                           is imperative if they are to work jointly in a constructive
                                           manner.

-------
            THE  SOCIAL  IMPLICATION  OF  CONTROLS
                                                 P. MICKEY
                                                Concern, Inc.
                                              Washington, D. C.
  May I begin by reading you a quote of Blackstone's
 which is  said  to  have  influenced the thinking  of
 Alexander Hamilton in the Declaration of Independence
 and the U. S. Constitution.*
  The principal aim of society is to protect individuals in
  the enjoyment of those absolute rights which were
  vested in them by the immutable laws of nature; but
  which could not be preserved, in peace, without that
  mutual assistance  and  intercourse, which is gained by
  the institution of friendly and social  communities.
  Hence it follows, that the first and primary end  of
  human laws is to maintain  and regulate these absolute
  rights of individuals.
  Individual or group awareness of the rights of citizens
 to the enjoyment of living or the quality of life and the
 part that communities must take in assuring these rights
 to all is the basic philosophy of today's environmental
 groups.
  We  no longer live in a simple world where clean air,
 clean  water,  and uncrowded  land  can  be  taken for
 granted. The problems of an  over-populated world need
 the cooperation of all of us — government, industry, and
 citizens.   Each  problem  begins  somewhere.  That
 somewhere is  usually directly traceable to the fact that
 there  are more people needing more jobs to  earn more
 money so  that they can consume more and  ultimately
 throw away more. This  has  become a natural, normal
 way of life for most of us. But maybe there has to be an
 end to the kind of consuming we have been doing, and
 this kind of growth in  our  communities. What might
 have been considered progress and prosperity a few years
 ago can today be  recognized as degradation  and a
 misplacement of values.
  Industry tells us that consumers  demand many items:
 high phosphate detergents for  whiter clothes; throwaway
 bottles and cans; fancy  packaging;  lighter throwaway
plastic containers, and many more. But in  truth it  is
 *William H. Marvell, Man-Made Morals: Four Philosophies That
  Shaped America.
industry  which has spoiled us by producing these and
other products, and convincing us that we need  them
through  Madison  Avenue  ads.  However, there  is  a
growing interest and awareness on the part of the buyer
today  of the  problems  that  are a  result  of this
convenient living  and overindulgence. We, at Concern,
believe that we may be seeing the beginning of a buyer
revolution where  concerned citizens are looking  for a
new market for products created with an awareness of
environmental impact. We  have dealt  with this new
market in our publications called Eco-Tips.
  We have also tried to encourage  re-use and recycling
for two  reasons:  to  reduce solid waste and to help
preserve our resources. Instead of being consumers, we
must really become users  and re-users if we  are to
protect the world around us for future users.  A well
known,  or well-quoted, statistic is that although the
United States represents less than 6  percent  of the
world's total population, we consume hah0 of the world's
natural resources  (each year). I am not an economist,
nor are most of the consumers whom I represent, but it
really doesn't  take an economist to realize that there is a
limit to production and consumption which can be called
progress.  If we use up our  resources without trying to
find ways to re-use or recover them, we may find our-
selves and our children running out of world in which
to live.
  As a first, and  perhaps a small, step, we at Concern
have joined with  many interested citizens in trying to
encourage recycling  of  paper,  glass,  and  aluminum
through the formation of recycling centers. In almost
every city of any  size in the country today you will find
housewives lugging their recyclable items to one of these
centers. This is not the long-term answer. But if there is
a real effort on the part of citizens to return some of our
resources for  recycling, there will be more of an effort
on  the part of industry and government to work  out a
better solution for overall long-term resource recovery.
  There is evidence of industry effort. For instance, in
the aluminum industry 10 cents a pound brought back
almost a billion cans in 1971 and may bring back more
                                                   169

-------
170
CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
 than  a billion and  a half in 1972. This  is a  small
 percentage -  about 12  percent in 1971  of the total
 aluminum cans which could be recycled. But when you
 think that the percentage has risen from 0 percent to 12
 percent in the past  few years, the increase is at least
 encouraging.  And  although  the  money  involved  is
 perhaps the prime motivation, we feel that this increase
 in reclamation is  dependent to a large degree on citizen
 interest.
  Because of the  difference in the value of the resources
 used in both glass and paper, recovery on an economic
 basis does not show  the same promise as aluminum. But
 in spite of this, both industries are recycling on a larger
 scale than ever before. And in both instances the desire
 of  citizens to cooperate  has sparked a greater industry
 effort.
  If it's true, as  a spokesman for Reynolds has stated,
 that large  amounts  of aluminum have been recovered,
 and even  larger  amounts  expected  to be recovered
 because of the 10 cents  a  pound reward, why, then, is
 there skepticism  about whether consumers will return
 bottles and  cans to recover a five cent  deposit.  If
 consumers  demand  the  convenience  of  throwaway
 containers  as industry  has  repeatedly told us, then not
 even  the aluminum drive  will succeed. We believe,
 however,  that  citizens  today have two basic motives
 prompting their   behavior:  Both  environmental and
 economic.
  It may take 10 to 20 years, maybe longer, to fully
 apply  the  technology available for separation before
 disposal, thereby  reclaiming a much larger proportion of
 our valuable  metals and  other  resources. But  with
 interim measures involving  citizen awareness of the
 necessity for resource recovery, there will be more of an
 educated  interest in  improved  solid  waste  disposal
 systems  which are  not  dependent on the  volunteer
 efforts of consumers.
  Part of our job, as we see it, is to  encourage people to
 think more, use less, re-use whenever  possible, and handle
 the remainder with the least hazard to the environment.
  We have not actively advocated government controls.
 However, we have certainly suggested that individuals or
 groups control and rethink their consumer  appetites in
 many areas. We have done this only after long months of
 study  and conferences with government and  industry
 scientists  well-known in each field, and other highly
 credible  private  and environmental groups. The  most
 important part of our work is the education of the many
 thousands of people throughout the country who have
 written us because they want to know what they can do,
 how they can do it, and why.
  We knew that  detergents with a very high percentage
 of phosphates were the biggest selling detergents, and we
 knew  that  these detergents  probably produced the
 whitest wash. However, we felt convinced that women in
 many parts of  the country would respond favorably to
 the suggestion  that  they  switch to  a  low phosphate
                                           detergent  or  soap if they were made aware  of the
                                           concern of limnologists in and out of government for the
                                           premature aging of many bodies of water in our country
                                           and  the  part  phosphorous was  playing in  this
                                           eutrification. Sales of high  phosphate  detergents
                                           probably  did  not  go down, but  the voice of the
                                           consumer  was heard. Local legislation was  enacted in
                                           several areas,  and industry reacted with a reduction in
                                           phosphates. The recent  announcement of  Proctor &
                                           Gamble of a  reduction  to six percent  phosphorous
                                           makes  the response  of the big  three in  the detergent
                                           industry unanimous. Perhaps for a long-term solution, a
                                           substitute  which is neither harmful to the environment,
                                           nor to humans, will be found because  of  consumer
                                           interest and government and industry research.
                                             In  the  plastics  area,  we have tried to inform the
                                           consumer  of  the solid waste  disposal problems of pvc
                                           containers. We have  also been concerned  about the
                                           recycling capabilities of plastics. Because of the action of
                                           many consumer groups, such as ours, and the concern of
                                           the  government,  especially  EJP.A.,  industry has
                                           responded with a search for substitutes and a continued
                                           search for  the recycling possibilities of all plastics.
                                             While we all realize that some pesticides are sometimes
                                           necessary, we have tired to steer the housewife and the
                                           gardener toward  other,   safer   methods  of pest
                                           control, using  the   less harmful  pesticides only  when
                                           absolutely necessary.  We have done this  both through
                                           our Eco-Tips and our calendar called The Living Garden
                                           which  we co-sponsored with  the Audubon  Naturalist
                                           Society.  This  calendar  makes suggestions  month by
                                           month on how to  garden without dangerous pesticides
                                           and sells well throughout the country.
                                             We have also tried to encourage the use of returnable
                                           bottles. Judging  from the state and local  legislation,
                                           either pending or enacted, we are not alone in believing
                                           that a container that is returned for re-use or recycling is
                                           the only environmentally sound container.
                                             In  the larger cities, particularly on both coasts, it is
                                           not   surprising  that  community  groups and
                                           environmental groups are not willing to sit  quietly by
                                           while inversions trap pollutants from automobiles and
                                           citizens are warned that outdoors is off limits to them.
                                           The Clean Air Act  of 1970 became a law because of the
                                           pressure of social  groups on Congress.  The controls
                                           spelled out in this law for Detroit to meet by 1975 and
                                           1976  are tough   controls,  and  may have  profound
                                           economic  ramifications,  but  I  can't believe there is
                                           anyone, even in Detroit, who doesn't realize that the
                                           mounting  air  pollution  from automobiles  is  a real
                                           problem and one  that must be solved. Aside from the
                                           tremendous  job EJP.A.  has  to face in  this exigency,
                                           community groups  must also become involved. Lay
                                           citizens are not capable of suggesting alternatives to the
                                           internal combustion engine, or the type of catalyst to be
                                           used  as an anti-pollution device, or how many parts per
                                           million of carbon monoxide or nitrogen oxide should be

-------
                                                                         SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS
                                                 171
allowable in the air they breathe, but the same citizens
must become  more aware and better educated to the
problem  so that  they can  understand how  to  help
implement  the solutions as they come along. Concern
has tried to  make suggestions  to the citizens on  its
mailing list. Because of the potential health hazards of
lead, we have  suggested  the use of  the lowest  lead,
lowest  octane gas  that can be used  without  an engine
knock. We have urged the use of unleaded gas whenever
possible and  tried to explain why. We have  been told
that many  people  are having the anti-pollution devices
which are now being installed on cars removed because
their cars use more gas and do not run as smoothly. This
attitude can best be discouraged by an understanding of
the problems of automobile pollution.
  Our next publication, which we expect to have ready
to mail in January, will be devoted to energy. We will try
to help consumers realize  the  need  for a  change in
attitude toward a  more intelligent and efficient use of
energy.  All energy costs will go up in the future. We
hope this rise in price will cause people to rethink their
energy needs. Large amounts of energy  can be saved
without any  real  sacrifice.  To  this  end we  will make
suggestions for  energy conservation in the  fields  of
transportation, architectural  design,  home heating and
cooling, household appliances, and commercial waste. As
far as recycled materials are concerned, we will try to
encourage an expansion of the market. There are, and
will be, many inconveniences (and expenses) for all of us
if we  are to  clean  up  our environment. But  if
government and industry, and research institutions such
as Batelle, Midwest  Research,  and others  will work
together to try to find answers, it is necessary  for citizen
groups such as ours to become better educated and to
encourage  the active cooperation of individuals  and
communities.
  Realizing  that  teamwork  is  necessary in  order to
accomplish environmental and  social goals, we might
think of this teamwork in terms of a football game.  The
citizen team  has long been  missing from the football
field. We have had industry teams playing, government
referees, and  citizens sitting in the  stands screaming
about the calls. These citizens should either be on the
field, or  lose their right to scream about the calls. We are
beginning to see more today  of the citizens coming  out
of the stands and getting onto the playing field.

  No one would argue that  the road toward ultimate
solutions is a long one. I don't think any  one would
argue that  this would be a much longer road without
community involvement.  We,  as  dedicated
environmentalists, undoubtedly will  stumble  a little
along the way to finding the long-term answers we are
seeking.  We feel  an urgency  to find well-thought  out
"Now"  answers until technology is  available for  the
long-term solutions. But there must be steps taken now
by  all of us, whether they be individual steps such as
careful,  selective buying, intelligent use and re-use,  and
thoughtful  disposal, or group steps, such as an active
interest   in  local  legislation for pollution control and
bond issues to support new technological advances  for
water treatment or solid waste disposal systems.
  The worst thing that could happen for all of us, and
our children, is to try to live  with problems that vitally
affect us, rather  than trying to work together to  do
something about them.

-------
                 HOW  MUCH  RECYCLING  IS  ENOUGH?
                                               T. PAGE*
                                     Resources for the Future, Inc.
                                            Washington, D.C.
INTRODUCTION
  When people think of spaceship earth, they generally
think of a closed  economic  system. Except for  solar
energy, in the long run all the flows are recycled. The
idea is attractive because  it implies a  kind of social
immortality.  Until  the far-off  day when  something
happens  to  the sun,  there is  no  reason why  human
existence  cannot go  on  generation after generation.
Actual spaceships are not immortal, of course. Apollo's
life-span was considerably less than a month; and  from
the first day vital stocks were depleted while satellites of
garbage began  to  accumulate  around  the  spaceship.
There is some irony in the fact that the economies of
primitive tribes approximated the concept of spaceship
earth far  more closely than the actual spaceship Apollo.
And modern economies seem to be moving away  from
the conditions of spaceship earth to those of spaceship
Apollo.
  A simple structure of economic flows is illustrated in
Figure  1. For a long-run steady state, flows to and  from
each sector must be equal. In a primitive economy the
extractive flow G is small, hence the waste flows A and
B, and  there is little to distinguish environmental dumps
from environmental  sources.  Natural  processes  (C)
quickly transform  economic wastes A  and B to  their
pre-use  forms.   But in  a modern economy  natural
recycling  cannot keep  up with the  production and
discard  of  DDT,  radioactive   waste,  fossil  fuel
combustion, packaging residuals, and the like. Not  only
cannot  natural  processes keep up with the increase in
waste flows,  but also  the form of waste residuals is
becoming less amenable  to environmental processing.
Flow C lags behind A and B and also extraction G.f
  Modern  economies  are suffering from  the  twin
problems  of too much waste and too few raw materials.
 'Research Associate  at  Resources for the  Future,  Inc.,
  Washington, D. C. The views expressed are his own and not
  necessarily those of REF.
 fThe dashed line is the boundary between the man-controlled
  and priced  economy and  the uncontrolled and unpriced
  environment.
£ "Mines" includes land for agriculture and forests.
                                AIR POLLUTION
                                WATER POLLUTION
                                SOLID WASTES
       Figure 1.  Simple schematic of environmental
                economic flows.
Greater recycling (more of C, D, E, and  F) is often
suggested as a solution to both problems. The question is
how much recycling  is  just the right amount. A purist
might be tempted to  answer everything. But then are we
to stop burning fossil fuel while waiting for new coal to
form, and are we to  stop using paint because its use is
dissipative? A sophisticated version of spaceship earth is
not to  require that  all sector flows be brought into
balance, but only the costs of maintaining flows. Instead
of closing down copper  mines, in this version technology
would  be channeled and simulated sufficiently to offset
the tendency toward  rising costs as the better grade ores
are depleted. Instead  of a long-run steady state in flows,
the sophisticated version  recognizes that  to  achieve
social immortality  it is sufficient to maintain forever
constant costs for service flows. At the opposite extreme
of the purist (C = G) is the economist who might counsel
us not  to take any active policy toward  recycling at all:
Simply  work  to improve  markets  and then  let the
markets decide how  much material of each type gets
recycled.
                                                   173

-------
174
CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
EFFICIENCY POINT OF VIEW ON RECYCLING
  When an economist recommends the improvement of
markets,  he  generally  has  a  standard  of  market
perfection in his mind. With perfect markets there are no
monopolies; each firm is too small to influence market
prices. Everyone  is  perfectly informed about  market
opportunities  and  product  characteristics.  Market
transactions,  as well as information, are costless. And,
most important for us, all external costs are internalized.
When a firm purchases labor inputs, the cost of labor is
internal to the  firm. But a firm's  smoke emission is a
cost as well, as  it  imposes burdens on those who receive
it. If there is  no smoke control, smoke emission is a cost
external  to  the firm,  and  the incidence of  cost  falls
outside the firm. If the  firm pays for the smoke, by
effluent  taxes  based  on  the  damage  to downwind
receivers and  by undertaking costly abatement activity,
then the external  cost of smoke emission is internalized.
  There  is an important theorem in economic theory
which tells us that under the above conditions  of market
perfection  the  economy is welfare  efficient. That is,
there would be no way to rearrange economic inputs and
production and distribution activities to make  anyone in
the present market  better  off without  simultaneously
making someone else worse off. It is difficult to see why
society should  be content with an inefficient  economic
allocation in  which  the  lot  of some  can  be  improved
without  hurting  others.  In  order to move  closer to
efficiency, certainly a desirable  property, economists
recommend steps that move us toward the conditions of
perfect markets.
  While  recycling is not viewed as desirable in itself,
steps toward  the conditions of market perfection would
increase the amount  of recycling. In order to internalize
costs,  effluent fees or standards  must be imposed upon
the emission  of air and water pollutants and disposal of
solid waste. We can imagine toll  booths set up on paths
A and B with charges on  the  flows on  the basis of
downstream damage. The effects are obvious: Because of
the  increased  cost  of  disposal,  byproduct  recovery
becomes more economically attractive; instead of paying
a  penny  a  pound, say, to  discard old newspapers,
households would find the alternative of accumulating
and  recycling more  attractive; in order  to put off the
final  disposal fee, cars and  other products  would be
designed for  greater  durability; products would  become
less  material intensive (transistor  over  vacuum  tube
radios); and  services  would be  favored over  products,
relative to the present situation.  Flows D,  E, and F
would increase relative to A and B.
  Since mining involves large external costs (acid mine
drainage, tailings, etc., which we can visualize  as flowing
through  B),  internalization  of costs would also favor
recycling relative  to G as well. However, some recycling
activities are notoriously polluting so that internalization
                                            of costs would not encourage all forms of recycling.
                                              It is  easy to exaggerate the price changes caused by
                                            internalization of costs. Certainly internalization of costs
                                            will not  drive us  back  to  the 18  century,  as some
                                            alarmists  maintain. Economic theory strongly  suggests
                                            that internalization of costs  will substantially  increase
                                            social well-being, not all of which is measured by GNP.
                                            Jerry  Delson  estimated that  price  increases  in the
                                            coal-electric industry caused by internalization  of costs
                                            would be in the range of 10  to 15  percent. (RFF study
                                            in process.)
                                              From the   point  of  view of  economic  efficiency,
                                            market perfection is important, not recycling per se, or
                                            durability, recoverability, or less material and  energy
                                            intensive  products. Whatever level  of recycling that
                                            occured under perfect markets would be the right level.
                                            While the recommendation to internalize costs goes back
                                            to  Pigou in   the first  part of  the century, it  is only
                                            recently that the recommendation has been put into
                                            practice.  As  the  use  of regulations, standards, and
                                            effluent fees  becomes  more  widespread, we expect an
                                            increase in recycling and other forms of material and
                                            energy  conservation.  At the same  time that extractive
                                            industries find themselves paying more of their external
                                            costs, the external costs themselves have been increasing.
                                            As we  move from  one percent to  one-half  percent
                                            copper  ore the amount of solid waste to be disposed of
                                            doubles. And finally there is some evidence that the
                                            century-long  trend  of constant  private costs of  mineral
                                            extraction is  changing  toward increasing private  costs.
                                            These  three  factors  affecting resource extraction, an
                                            increasing fraction  of external costs to be internalized,
                                            greater  external  costs, and  growing  private costs, all
                                            stimulate  resource conservation  (choke off G in favor of
                                            more D, E, and F).
                                             As an economist  I regret the last two factors which, if
                                            true, will diminish present and future welfare and show
                                            that we  are  beginning  to  lose  the Malthusian  race
                                            between diminishing  returns  to nature and technology;
                                            but I applaud the first factor  which  will increase our
                                            aggregate  well-being though probably not the short run
                                            well-being of the mineral extractive industries.

                                            MARKETS, EFFICIENCY, AND DEPLETION
                                             Thus  far the point of view of efficiency and perfect
                                            markets has had nothing to say about the second of our
                                            twin problems, that we are depleting our vital stocks of
                                            raw materials. When we use up tin and phosphates today
                                            and scatter them beyond reclamation, we pre-empt their
                                            use tomorrow. Foreclosure of the future's opportunity is
                                            a cost imposed upon the future, just as is bequeathing to
                                            the  future  high levels  of mercury  in ocean  fish.  Is
                                            depletion of  tomorrow's resources an  external cost  in
                                            exactly the same way that unregulated pollution in the
                                            present is an external cost?
                                             The answer is no. Individual firms have an incentive to
                                            take into account the costs of depletion imposed upon

-------
                                                                                    RECYCLING
                                                                                                         175
the future  while there is no corresponding incentive, in
the absence of regulation, disposal fees, or government
specifications, to take into account the external costs of
pollution in  the present. If the owner of a mineral
deposit believes that the future price is going to  be bid
up  in  response to the mineral's depletion and hence
future  scarcity, then  the owner has an incentive  to
stretch out production. In the past incentive, while of
great interest to economists, was probably very weak.
Technology kept pace with Malthus, and with constant
costs the speculative value of reservation was worthless.
In addition,  many deposits  are  in  politically unstable
areas overseas so  that there  is a powerful  offsetting
incentive to  get it  out  before  nationalization. Now,
however, if  the price trend  is  upward, for scarcity
reasons, there may be  more resource reservation  due to
speculation on future  price increases. The point  is that
there is an asymmetry in ownership of material in the
environment.  In the environment  at the  top  of the
diagram, valuable materials are owned or are managed by
profit-seeking firms.  But in the environment  at  the
bottom burdensome materials, pollutants, are disowned
by these  same  firms, by means of smokestacks and
outflow pipes.
  So  the  twin  problems  of  depletion  and  waste
accumulation are  not  twin after all. The market  fails
where  ownership  fails.   And  by this standard many
economists  have taken ownership failure as a cue to
advocate artificial markets of effluent fees and standards
for wastes  entering the environment, and the existence
of  ownership of resources  as a cue to  let the market
decide how to allocate resource extraction over time.
  Now let  us  suppose   for  a minute  that  somehow
artificial markets have been  created which effectively
internalize  the  costs of  waste disposal  and  the other
conditions  for perfect markets are more or less met. Is
the  market going to give the future a fair shake  with
respect to  inter-temporal allocation of virgin resources?
Is the  market going to encourage us to gobble up the
nonrenewable resources   of  this  generation and leave
scattered and contaminated  residuals for the future to
recycle as best it can?  Perhaps it is fair for us to exploit
the best deposits and leave the future with the remnants,
for the future will be smarter, having better technology,
and richer, at least in terms of GNP. Many will think it
unfair.
  In order to tell whether or not individual firms are
motivated to practice sufficient resource reservation, we
need a criterion to  make the  necessary comparisons
between present and future well-being. Harold Hotelling,
who developed the "theory of resource reservation,"
advocated  along with many  other  economists a social
criterion analogous to a firm's profit criterion. For  each
generation  there  should be  defined  a  measure  of
well-being  (welfare function), depending on  individual
preferences and market  fulfillment of the preferences.
Hotelling assumed that just as a firm is best off when it
maximizes the present value of its profit stream, society
is best off when it maximizes the discounted sum of
social  welfare  measures.  The  criterion Hotelling
proposed is an economics of the firm writ large. We will
call it a present value welfare criterion (PVWC).
  Many people  find  the discounting of future welfare
repulsive because it seems to favor the present over the
future.  However,  the PVWC is  not  inherently biased
toward the present. If we are going to combine measures
of welfare over  time  by addition, we have to discount
the future to offset productivity in order to keep the
future from being favored over the present. Suppose we
took the PVWC  with a zero discount rate: Instead of the
present consuming a bushel of corn the criterion would
instruct us to plant the corn so  that the future  could
have  two  bushels.  Furthermore there  is  a  market
tendency for a rate of  discount to be  equal to the
productivity  of  capital; this in turn tends to equalize
social welfare over time.
  One reason for the popularity of the PVWC among
economists is that it  is a normative statement  of what
markets tend, more  or  less, to  do  by themselves.
However, while the PVWC is not  guilty  of inherent bias
toward the present, it does have a  number of drawbacks.
Perfect  markets  is an  attractive  objective
intra-temporally because it  leads to  welfare efficiency
for those in the present  market. But perfect markets,
which are  somehow lined   to  the PVWC,  do  not
guarantee welfare  efficiency over  the larger set  of
present  and future  people. In a market equilibrium the
present  is indiffernt  between a little more investment
and a little more consumption, but the future prefers
more  past investment to more past  consumption. This
non-matching of indifferences lays the basis for gains
from  trade,  if trade were possible between generations.
And the possibility of  gains from trade means  that the
present equilibrium was  not welfare efficient after all.
  Linkage between present and future is  a mechanism by
which the  future  can influence the  welfare of the
present.  For example,  our  present  efforts  at species
preservation or wilderness preservation are more valuable
to us  if we believe that  the next generation will increase
its efforts at preservation. Diversity of species is an asset
whose value  continues over  many  generations.  Our
efforts  at  species  preservation  are  not  just  for  our
generation, or the next, but for many generations. Thus
our valuations of our efforts of preservation  depend on
our beliefs  about future  actions. Since all the traders,
present  and future,  cannot  bargain  in a single room,
there  is no way  for present markets to take into account
these  asset   linkages.  Consequently the  market  will
provide too  few of these assets  whose value is linked
over time. By the same argument the market will provide
too many negatively  valued assets whose disservices are
linked over time.
  On  the other extreme  from thinking that the PVWC
inherently  biases  welfare  toward  the present,  it  is

-------
176
CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
sometimes said that the PVWC, working through perfect
markets, would maximize future welfare. The PVWC can
only maximize one thing at a time, and the maximand is
a sum of geometrically weighted  welfare measures and
not the welfare of any single period. The PVWC does not
guarantee that future welfare will  be as large as our own
or even that enough resources wil be provided to sustain
future existence.
  Nor does the PVWC guarantee  that allocations made
by the present market are ones that we will be happy to
live with tomorrow. It  would be desirable  to  have a
criterion which would allocate resources in such a way
that if the next generation could change past  allocation
it would still keep the past as it  was. The property of
harmony  is  analogous  to  a regret-free life  of  an
individual.  "If I had  a  chance to live  my life over I
wouldn't change a  single  thing."  The PVWC does not
have the property of inter-temporal harmony.
  In  my  judgment  the  prescription,  "perfect  the
markets and  let the markets decide" is distinctly less
attractive  in the  inter-temporal case  than  in  the
intra-temporal case. In the intra-temporal case  perfect
markets would at least provide welfare  efficiency. Not
only that, but in the  intra-temporal case efficiency can
be separated from the  problem of distribution of wealth.
That  is, for  any given  distribution of  wealth  market
perfection leads  to efficiency  for those in the  present
market. We can,  and do, alter the distribution of income
and  wealth through   income  taxes,  while  we
independently recommend policy for market perfection
by  effluent  taxes. But in the inter-temporal case it  is
impossible to separate the inter-temporal distribution of
wealth from  inter-temporal market allocations.  Market
allocations  determine the  distribution  of  aggregate
wealth  over  generations.  Because  in the latter case
efficiency  cannot be  separated from  distribution, the
PVWC is not  so ethically neutral as the prescription for
market  perfection by  internalizing enternal costs falling
on the present.
  Long-lived  pollutants,  such  as radioactive  wastes,
DDT,  and  some heavy  metals snare  the  same  ethical
problem  as conservation.  We   can  think  of these
pollutants as negatively valued capital  assets which give
off streams  of disservices as they depreciate. Many of
these  pollutants pose problems because their  effects are
unknown  and we  lose control of them once they get
outside the  economic sector. Emitted in very small
concentrations they may accumulate in unforeseen ways
to become highly toxic, or persist as backgrounds slowly
raising the probability  of cancer and other diseases.
  Because these materials are sometimes very difficult to
control once  generated, the best control may sometimes
be limitation of the generation. For example, cadmium
is produced  with every pound of zinc. Even processed
zinc carries  some  cadmium  with it, which gradually
wears off  into  the  environment.  One way  to  control
cadmium would  be to recycle more zinc and mine less
                                            new zinc. That way less  new cadmium would  be
                                            introduced into the economic sector and ultimately less
                                            to  the  environment  affecting  man. Often, however,
                                            direct or  indirect recycling  will not be the answer to
                                            control of long-term hazardous materials. Control at the
                                            source  and reduction  of  the source  may sometimes be
                                            the best management of a toxic material.
                                              As we saw, the perfect  market  prescription of effluent
                                            fees and standards said nothing directly about recycling,
                                            yet imposition of  effluent taxes and standards would
                                            lead to more recycling. In the same way perfect markets
                                            say nothing directly about recycling, yet perfect markets
                                            with resource  reservation due to speculation on future
                                            price  increases  should  in  theory  lead  to  resource
                                            conservation. The point of view  of efficiency treats the
                                            two problems  of  waste  accumulation and  depletion
                                            similarly; that  is, as  indirect effects rather than desirable
                                            goals per  se.  But,  as  mentioned, while the efficiency
                                            point of view is sufficient  for the  intra-temporal problem
                                            (pollution and waste accumulation) it is less satisfactory
                                            for  the  inter-temporal problem  (inter-generational
                                            transfers  of wealth  from depletion and slow decaying
                                            pollutants). We may also wonder how  effective is the
                                            market mechanism  of resource  reservation. Suppose a
                                            mining company can  borrow or lend  at eight to  10
                                            percent but that it acts on an internal rate of discount at
                                            18  to  22 percent.  There is  some  evidence that  such
                                            imperfections in the capital market are widespread. How
                                            much resource reservation will this company practice?
                                            Not much.
                                            WHAT ABOUT SPACESHIP EARTH?
                                              The point of view of efficiency  and perfect markets
                                            has little to say about the future's right to existence. By
                                            the PVWC the future's right is  a collection of  desires
                                            which should be translated into willingnesses to pay and
                                            discounted to the present. This seems to be the wisdom
                                            of the PVWC.  Yet we may ask who chose this criterion?
                                            It seems quite  possible that if there were a vote between
                                            the PVWC and a criterion guaranteeing some form of
                                            social immortality, the latter would win. People tolerate
                                            many forms of market imperfection, monopolies and
                                            misleading advertizing, for example, but they make great
                                            sacrifices for their children and genetic lines.
                                              Now  let  us assume   that  some form  of social
                                            immortality is considered just and desirable. With this
                                            goal the  cost  of maintaining our  present  standard  of
                                            living should not greatly increase, and perferably should
                                            decline, and the hazards of global catastrophe should in
                                            some sense be  minimized. Then what should we do now,
                                            in the  present? It seems clear that we should  try to
                                            estimate  various  possible futures  which  result from
                                            present  policy  choices.  We then choose those  policy
                                            choices  which lead  to  desirable  future  states.  The
                                            procedure is  a  common  one for  macro-economic
                                            problems  such as  inflation  and unemployment.  For
                                            example,  we  decide  that a  six  percent  inflation is

-------
                                                                                   RECYCLING
                                                                                                        177
unacceptable, but a three percent inflation is acceptable.
The goal seeming right and feasible, the money supply is
then manipulated to achieve it.
  One obvious policy instrument to move the economy
toward  a steady  state  of social  immortality is  the
severance tax. Long-run population policies are perhaps
even more crucial than material flow policies. The two
policy  areas are  similar  in that, for both, very gentle
incentives can have enormous effect over a 200 to 300
year time horizon.  A  severance  tax leads  us toward
spaceship earth  in  several ways. It raises the  price of
virgin  material  relative  to  secondary and hence
encourages recycling. More important, in the  longer run
it stimuates technology to develop production processes
that further  take advantage of the  relatively cheaper
recycled materials. And of course severance taxes, in the
long run, favor  product durability and service intensive
commodities over material intensive ones.
  Severance taxes are like import tariffs in that they are
collected at a small number of entry ports. They are far
easier to collect  than disposal taxes levied upon the final
owner of a material. As states with anti-litter laws have
found  out,  it is impossible  to prevent  surreptitious
dumping. Schemes  to  collect  disposal taxes  at the last
manufacturer have to provide  for recycled content. And
then definition and certification of recycled  becomes a
difficult problem,  while  the  problem of surreptitious
dumping  remains  with  processors  before  the  final
manufacturer.  Administrative  costs  of  collecting  a
disposal tax are much higher at the final consumer (A)
than at the  first processor (G). It may be that the best
place to collect a disposal tax is at G where it becomes a
severance tax. To resolve the  question one must weigh
the reduction in administrative  cost against  the loss of
efficiency from collecting the disposal tax too early.
  Severance taxes  are  understandably unpleasant  to
mining companies, while they are something of a pipe
dream to recycling companies. How can severance taxes
come  into  being,  one  may  ask,  while  depletion
allowances, which are negative severance  taxes, are  so
well entrenched? Yet in the near future people may take
a harsher view  toward  tax policy  which  encourages
depletion  and  helps  transform  spaceship  earth  into
spaceship Apollo.
  It  is  perhaps  misleading  to  talk  about  specific
resources  as immutably nonrenewable with dates upon
which each will run out. Perhaps the entire planet should
be viewed as a single asset which  managed in one way is
renewable and managed in another way is nonrenewable.
Economic  theory  tells  us that  even perfect  present
markets will provide us with too little of the time-linked
renewable asset. The  point  is that the earth is  an asset
whose type can  be changed; we  have a  choice  as  to
which type of  asset we want it to become. A hundred
years from now the choice may no longer exist.  We may
have  irrevocably  transformed spaceship  earth into a
progressively more hazardous and time-limited spaceship
Apollo.
HOW MUCH RECYCLING IS ENOUGH?
  In terms of the first problem, the intra-generational
one  of waste  accumulation, the  proper amount  of
recycling  is  whatever  amount  that is  induced by
internalization of costs. In terms of the second problem,
depletion  and inter-generational transfers of wealth, it is
much more difficult to  ansser. A minimum which might
appeal to many people is to provide enough incentives
for  recycling  so  that  we  do not  foreclose the
opportunity of a comfortable  spaceship earth a hundred
years from now.

-------
                           LAW  AND  TRACE  METALS
                                             E. F. MURPHY
                                          Ohio State University
                                             Columbus, Ohio
 INTRODUCTION
    I have been asked to say a few words on the legal
 problems of trace metals. It has been a problem both in
 health  and  law  for  a long time; and, obviously, the
 discovery  of the health effects  had to precede  any
 concern at  law.  Until  the relationship between the
 presence of  some particular  metal within a product or
 process  and a resultant  disease has been established,
 there is no need for the attention of the law,  or, at any
 rate until the advent of technology assessment concepts.
 This has been the prevailing view (1).
    Confining myself to metals rather than  embracing
 the larger aspect of trace elements, the presence of these
 has served many functions over the centuries and only
 slowly  has there  emerged   any  realization  of
 hygienico-legal difficulties.  I do  not  suggest that the
 difficulties of dealing with the entirety of the effects of
 all  trace  elements are generically different  from the
 narrower issue of trace metals; but I do believe that how
 to  cope with nitrates and  the  possibility of nitrate
 poisoning, carbon dioxide and the risk of the greenhouse
 effect, or  industrial gases  and solar irradiation in the
 atomsphere  are far more  major  difficulties  than  any
 raised by trace metals (2). Hence my narrower scope.
  The metals with which I am going to deal are  lead,
 mercury,  copper, zinc,  beryllium,  chrome,,  iron,
 cadmium, vanadium, nickel, and, while commonly not a
 metal, asbestos (3). Some of their side effects have long
 been known but only in recent ages have their dangers
 been commonly  recognized. For  example, the ancient
 Romans, lacking distilled alcohol, added lead salts to
 their wine in order to enjoy the resulting intoxication
 (4). Some  attribute  the  fall  of  the  Empire to  the
 destruction of the intellectual capacity of the elite due
 to lead poisoning. During the Renaissance mercury was
 liberally  used as a cure for venereal disease, with little
 regard for  its less  beneficent  effects,  and  lead was
 employed by such beauties as  Lucrezia  Borgia for the
 dead-white face  then  so much  admired (5). Copperous
waters  were  considered  healthful and  were widely
prescribed; and  only recently  have there been strong
arguments against the popularity of "deliciously tasting"
water heavy in iron. What was sought by one age has
become a condition to be avoided by another. This is
not to say that we are not right to seek such avoidance.
It is only to  observe  that one  could expect little
prohibitory or corrective activity from the law as long as
the above practices were common.
  Furthermore, we have to recognize that ever more
common economic activities have introduced into the
receiving elements of air,  water, and soil quantities of
trace metals previously  unknown on any except very
territorially  restricted scales.  For example,  a  recent
survey of earthworms near highways  was conducted by
the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (6). It  was
determined that levels of lead, zinc, nickel, and cadmium
were  sufficiently  high to  be fatal to birds consuming
them, Zinc is in car oil  and was found at all  distances
measured (maximum from the highway was 160 feet).
At  50 ppm, zinc  has been fatal to young pigs, but the
lowest reading for the earthworms was 52.7 ppm. Lead
is used in gasoline and was found  in  earthworms taken
10  feet  from  the highway  to be 200 ppm,  which is
enough  to  kill  mallard  ducks  eating  such worms.
Cadmium is emitted from  tires and, while lethal to  rats
at 62 ppm, the heaviest concentration was 12.6 only.
Nickel is used in oil and gasoline and was heaviest near
the highway. In several instances, concentrations away
from the highway were heavier than  near it, which was
explained as  the  result of  water runoff. Clearly, the
study revealed that the concentration of the auto on the
modern highway  introduces factors  into the  ecumene
different than  any known  before and does so  in  a
manner likely to have serious impact  upon the ecology.
This example does not directly affect  human health, but
similar illustrations with such a result could be found
easily.
  As a lawyer interested in the subject of trace metals, I
have  to  point  out that the interest divides between
workmen's  compensation law and the larger (and more
hard to determine) law of general health and ecological
effects.  Both have been a  long-standing  interest of the
                                                   179

-------
180
CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
law. As early as the 1880's, insurance to protect workers
against  the ill effects of their work was established in a
few  Continental countries and was urged by reformers
(7).  The common law in Anglo-American countries gave
the  worker  no protection, in the  absence  of gross
negligence by his employer, and gross negligence rarely
was  present within the customs of the time. The result
was  that, even  though  reformers  began to  push for
statutes setting the conditions of work and ventilation in
factories in England and the United States in the 1860's
to protect the workers against bad air conditions (8), the
laws to  compensate workers  for disease  coming from
those poor conditions did not begin to appear until the
turn  of the  present   century (9).  As  to  generally
atmospheric  regulation, England   set up  an  alkaline
inspectorate in the  mid-1870's; but it was not until the
1960's that either England or the United States came to
have even somewhat effective air pollution control laws
(10).
  All of this, however, is history. Today there exist both
federal  and state  laws  on  industrial  hygiene,  workers
health and safety, workmen's compensation, and air and
water pollution  control that, directly or indirectly, are
profoundly concerned with the consequences  of trace
metals in the environment  as  the  result  of economic
activity (11). Some of them  are of recent  enactment,
particularly  at  the  federal  level,  and  others  are
sufficiently old to have accumulated a large body of case
law. But there is now enough  to be able to select out
pertinent materials  relating  to the  subject, so  that one
can  talk about both  the problem and  the  law's
attempted solution of  it. Because  of the nature of this
paper, I shall use a distinction by  the individual trace
metals  rather than by legal concepts in dealing  with
them. Beyond this, I have only my above caveat that the
statutes  and  cases  divide into  the  larger categories  of
concern with in-plant happenings and  with effects upon
the larger environment.
LEAD
  The  oldest  metal for  which serious side  effects are
known is lead. "Painter's colic" is a very  old idiom and
the  law has  dealt with  it  in the  form of  workmen's
compensation awards  since the establishment of that
system  of legal redress. The cases involving impairment
of earning capacity, the  aggravation of the disease, the
size of the award, and so forth are numerous (12). 1 shall
not discuss this  aspect of the problem here  but I shall,
instead, move to considering the  current public fears
about lead:  Namely lead-based paint and lead and lead
alkyls in gasoline.
  The use of lead in house paints has been regarded as a
menace for the reason that its presence imparts a sweet
taste to the paint  flakes, which induces children to eat
them. Examinations of slum children have shown large
enough   quantities  of  lead within their  systems  to
adversely affect  their intelligence  or  else to provide  a
                                            dangerous situation if a prolonged fever should cause the
                                            body  to  attempt a mobilization of its resources. The
                                            result  would be  a  drawing out of the stored  up lead in
                                            one sudden rush (13).
                                              Some  have argued that  this is an  exaggeration. Not,
                                            they say, that lead is not a serious problem within inner
                                            city regions, but that banning it from house paint will
                                            solve no  problems and will simply remove  an effective,
                                            cheap  fabric  preserver  of  property  from  public
                                            availability. A recent  study in the not-very  urbanized
                                            city of Durham, North Carolina, showed that "lead yield
                                            is related to land use and the increased traffic density
                                            that corresponds to commercial  development," so that
                                            "the yield  of  lead from the  predominantly residential
                                            area W was one-half of that from the more commercially
                                            developed area N." Most of the lead was presumed to be
                                            contributed from surface wash and to be the product of
                                            exhausts  of  internal  combustion  engines  of  motor
                                            vehicles using leaded gasolines. The "annual yield of lead
                                            was determined to be 1,190 pounds per square mile per
                                            year"  with "the  more  commercialized  and  densely
                                            urbanized portion of the basin studied yield [ing]  lead at
                                            twice  the rate  of the less intensively developed portion
                                            of the basin, in  direct  proportion to the area of paved
                                            surfaces," thus indicating the danger to children in inner
                                            city areas (14).
                                              Another reason why  the removal of lead-based house
                                            paints will not solve problems for inner city children is
                                            indicated in a  study by the  child psychiatrist Reginald
                                            Lourie. Dr. Lourie's study  shows that children suffering
                                            from lead ingestion are also victims of the symptom pica
                                            (L., magpie) which compels them to eat or at least put
                                            in their mouths  all sorts of unsuitable substance, most
                                            commonly  dirt  which,  considering  lead levels  in the
                                            inner  city, will  be high in  lead. Psychiatrically these
                                            children suffer from neglect  and the speediest, indeed
                                            the  only  effective, cure for this  symptom  is  to  induce
                                            the  mother or  the mother surrogate to show interest in
                                            the child. Nothing can reverse the damage done by what
                                            has  been eaten,  but  at least the eating  of unsuitable
                                            substances is stopped prospectively. Conditions such as
                                            these are hard to  legislate about; but it helps  explain
                                            why lead poisoning has not been found in many groups
                                            of children, even though lead-based paints are in their
                                            dwellings and lead-loaded soils are in their yards. These
                                            children  are  not  pica  sufferers  because  of a  more
                                            fortunate  parent-child relationship  (15).  Such
                                            psychiatric  data  does not  justify the continued use of
                                            lead in  interior  paint;  but  it  does help  explain the
                                            unevenness of  the  problem  and  why  the ban on
                                            lead-based paint will not provide a complete answer.
                                              Congress temporized by enacting the Lead-Based Paint
                                            Prevention  Act  (16). Despite its ambitious  name, its
                                            primary functions are to grant research aids for studying
                                            the  effects  of  lead-based paints and for  providing
                                            education for persons resident in areas  where  the use of
                                            lead-based paints poses a particular problem, as well as

-------
                                                                      LAW AND TRACE METALS
                                                                                                         181
to assist them in seeking employment although damaged
by the presence of such paint. The United States Pub lie
Health Service has  issued  a  regulation as a  notice of
proposed rule making to ban lead-based paint in federal
and federally assisted  construction, which would have
broad prospective effect (17). The United States Food
and Drug Administration has  proposed declaring certain
heavy metal-containing paints and other surface coatings
subject to  a  special labeling  for  child protection  (18).
They  also  propose  to classify paints  containing more
than minute traces of lead as among "Banned Hazardous
Substances" (19). The late Congressman Ryan proposed
to  ban  the   use  of  lead-based  paint;  but,  to  my
knowledge, this has not been acted upon favorably (20).
Ultimately, however, if the  public pressure continues,
lead-based  house paint  will  be  banned, at least for
interior uses; persons using it illegally will be subject to
criminal punishment; and, clearly, there will be pressure
for public funds to  be used to remove the accumulation
of lead-based paints in housing interiors. All the above
will be years in becoming effective. Once the image is
established in the public mind of children having their
mental faculties destroyed or impaired for life, by having
eaten paint flakes while in their cribs, the politics of the
image become very plain. And law is a consequence of
politics.
  Lead in  gasoline  is another common puWic concern
today, and there is great pressure to compel refiners to
remove it. Lead was  introduced for  its "anti-knock"
properties  to meet  the  needs of the higher pressure
engines in the late 1920's  and  for this purpose has
retained  its  popularity. The public has shown  little
interest in  voluntarily using as alternatives the lead-free
gasolines on  the market, including many introduced in
the past  two years  (21). Many say this is because they
have not been adequately advertised and others say it is
because they do not give the public  the performance
they want in gasoline. In any event, the pressure has
been on for some time to ban the use of lead in gasoline.
  In 1971 President Nixon, perturbed by the fact that
95  percent of the total lead emitted into the atmosphere
comes from autos, proposed a tax on lead which would
make  leaded  gasolines  less competitive  with  the
nonleaded  variety  (22).  His then Secretary  of  the
Treasury called lead "a clear and  present danger" to the
national health and backed a proposal  for .taxing it in
gasoline (23). The President  in his 1972 environmental
message  included a statement that federal  regulatory
measures must be taken in the future against the dangers
of lead released  into the environment  (24).  The Clean
Air Act,  as amended,  had   already  stated  that
manufacturers of  fuels  and  fuel  additives  could  be
required  to register  any additives used in fuel  sold in
interstate commerce (25). Clearly, this  was meant to be
preparatory  to  further  legislative  action  since  the
registration in this  act  was solely for  the  purpose of
gathering information  and no regulatory activity  was
involved.
  In  February  1972  the  Environmental Protection
Administration issued a  regulation on  fuels and  fuel
additives  relating  to  lead  and phosphorus in motor
vehicle gasoline (26). Basically it prescribed that there
should be a decrease of such materials in gasoline and
that by July 1,  1974  there be available on the market
gasolines free of these  substances, capable of being used
in 1975 model cars (27). At  about the  same time, the
EPA issued  a  paper in connection with leaded gasoline
which was an analysis and summary of the medical and
scientific  evidence  on the health  hazards of air-borne
lead (28). This was not a criteria document, but it was
designed to underscore the reasons for the EPA's action.
Recently,  the EPA has also begun to become concerned
with the quality of diesel fuel, and an across-the-board
federal  interest  in  all motor vehicle  fuels is to  be
expected.  The public concern does not show any signs of
political  abatement,  despite  the  apparent  lack  of
enthusiasm at the  market level for lead-free gasolines.
One can anticipate that there will be further regulations
and statutes controlling the use of lead in fuels, indeed,
probably  eventually banning its use before the end of
the present decade (29).
  The  public  is continuously assailed by the fear of
possibly  harmful   effects  from   lead.   Recently, the
importation of cookware and crockery  from abroad,
either made of a clay containing a high quantity of lead
or  with  glazes  having  high quantities  of lead  and
cadmium  which  are released either by heat or reaction
with the organic substances in the dish, have attracted
public attention. The warnings against both foreign and
domestic ware that is dangerous under these conditions
have been spread around and Senator  Schweiker has
introduced legislation to control the amount of lead and
cadmium which may be released from ceramic or enamel
dinnerware  (30). Many  persons  have  ceased  to use
Mexican  pottery  or peasant-ware  imported from the
Mediterranean because of these fears, even though any
usage other  than fairly regular would probably be safe.
This merely underscores the fears with which the public
continuously finds  itself surrounded in relation to the
metal lead in daily life.

MERCURY
  Mercury is another substance high on the list of public
fears. Litigation has been high in relation to this metal,
notably the efforts of the State of Ohio to prevent its
further dumping into waters draining into Lake Erie and
to impose on previous dischargers  the costs of cleanup
(31).  Environmental  problems  have  affected  the
popularity of mercury  and  have very  nearly halted
United States production of it. In July  1965 the price
was  725 dollars for a 76 pound flask. In May 1972 the
price was  175 dollars, the lowest price for mercury since
1950. American  use had dropped from 77,370  flasks in
1969 to approximately 48,000 in  1972. In 1970, there

-------
182
CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
were 79 United States mines which sank to fewer than
30  by  1972. To meet  expenses of production in  the
United  States,  the  price must be somewhere between
225 and  250  dollars, in  1972 per flask. Changes in
chlorine production have simply eliminated the use of
mercury rather than  seeking to control its use. World
production  of  mercury, however, has dropped only
slightly  as the result of the American  experience; and,
conversely,  the  world's biggest producers, Spain and
Italy, have upped production. Interestingly, according to
the Wall Street Journal, the industry believes "nobody
can afford research  ... to find nonpolluting uses for the
metal,"  due to its present high production costs and low
price (32).
  The  problems  of mercury have acted  to panic  the
public because of  isolated horror cases.  The use  of
mercury-dressed seeds either  to  make bread or to feed
hogs has caused  terrible harm to persons eating either
the bread  or  the pork.  In Japan, where residents  of
Minamata Bay  eat mostly fish taken out of a very
confined water body into  which mercury wastes flow
from a chemical plant, the harm has been extensive (33).
"Mad Hatter's disease," because  of its damage to mental
process, nerve", and important bodily processes one the
public long has feared; and  the pressure against mercury
users will rise. Its use for seed dressings will probably be
entirely  eliminated, though this has used less than 3
percent  of  the  domestic   consumption of  the  metal.
Labeling does not  seem adequate to protect the rural
agricultural laborer who has been the chief victim of the
misuse  of  mercury-dressed  seed. Modernization   of
techniques  using  mercury also seemed  designed  to
eliminate  it from  the economy in anything  like  its
present  employ,  even though as late as  mid-1969  the
United  States  Bureau of  Mines  insisted the  use  of
mercury could be expected  to increase indefinitely at up
to 4-1/2 percent per year in industrialized nations. Paint
manufacturers,  although  insisting  they cause  no
problem, arc: considering eliminating mercury from their
products (34).
  The entire public attitude has  changed radically since
1969 on the subject with the announcement of relatively
high mercury contents in Lake Erie fish. "Minamata Bay
sickness" loomed  large in the public mind as a possibility
in the United States. It has not been put at  rest by
subsequent investigations by paleoecologists which have
shown   mercury  concentrations  in  museum  fish
specimens (35)  and  by studies of similar specimens to be
in a probable  decline since 1900 in the  Unites States,
possibly resulting from the  lack  of the use of soft coal.
Nor have Americans been impressed by being told only
heavy fish eaters from one  source are most vulnerable, a
condition of vulnerability  not  likely  for the  average
American who  buys from  a national market and is not
much of a fish eater anyway (assuming he is not on the
Norman Jolliffe diet). Mercury is cumulative, as the old
doctors  who practiced calomel-and-castor-oil medicine
                                            knew; and this fact is cumulative in the public mind.
                                              Because of this EPA has listed mercury along with
                                            asbestos and beryllium under the Clean Air Act as one of
                                            the  three hazardous air substances (36). The ability of
                                            organisms to  concentrate mercury is particularly noted
                                            in the regulations, and this  is given as one of the reasons
                                            to be concerned with all mercury emitters, even those
                                            which might  appear to  be small.  Anyone advising a
                                            corporation, therefore, would likely tell them, however
                                            small  their use of mercury, to  try  to  eliminate it
                                            altogether if  possible. Why keep  troublesome trifles
                                            around? Especially when they do not prove trifling in
                                            ecologic, industrial, or litigation costs.

                                            ASBESTOS
                                             A mineral which has created far less  perturbation in
                                            the  public mind, and yet is listed by the EPA as one of
                                            the  three hazardous substances under the Clean Air Act,
                                            is asbestos. In medical literature, asbestosis, the disease
                                            associated with  exposure to asbestos in the air, has been
                                            identified  since 1924; but it was  not until forty years
                                            later, when the New York  Academy of  Sciences held a
                                            conference on the biological effects  of asbestos that  the
                                            full  impact   of the  mineral  on  public  health  was
                                            understood (37). It has been only since 1964. therefore,
                                            that the efforts have been mounted to control the use of
                                            asbestos from the point of view of protecting public
                                            health.
                                             Asbestos is a mineral whose effect cuts  across both
                                            workmen's  compensation  law  (38)  and the legal
                                            consequences  of asbestos use as it affects  members of
                                            the  general public. Clearly the ones most endangered by
                                            asbestos are those whose employment regularly causes
                                            them  to  come  into  contact with it  (39). However,
                                            regular usage  need not be prolonged in order for  the
                                            results  to be  serious  and  the effect may be  so long
                                            delayed  that the individual  involved may have forgotten
                                            when he suffered exposure to the mineral.  The Federal
                                            Occupational  Health and Safety  Act has lain down far
                                            tougher  general rules  than had previously  prevailed in
                                            most states, and  it is  important  today  in  the  type of
                                            protection a  worker  may anticipate in his work
                                            conditions (40). Industrial hygiene legislation is designed
                                            to head off the need  for workmen's compensation for
                                            industrially related illnesses. It removes the  cause of the
                                            illness in the  affected industrial processes or it requires
                                            that the worker be protected in his work situation from
                                            the  effects  of  the  work process  with  which  his
                                            employment  requires  him  to deal  (41). The  need for
                                            workmen's  compensation  indicates   either   an
                                            unawareness that a problem initially existed, a failure of
                                            the  law to cope with the problem once it was discovered,
                                            or  a technological impossibility  of  protecting  the
                                            worker, coupled with a socio-economic decision that the
                                            process  involved is too important to be  banned because
                                            of the risks involved.
                                              Outside of  this, however, are the possible risks to the

-------
                                                                     LAW AND TRACE METALS
                                                                                                        183
general public who are not exposed to asbestos in their
employment  situations  (42). Commonly  today in the
construction  of high-rise steel-frame buildings, asbestos
is sprayed on the structure prior to closing it within its
poured concrete  envelopes and  curtain  walls.  Before
regulations were  adopted  (one of the toughest being
New York City's ordinance which went into effect in
February, 1972) (43), the effect was  of a wintry snow
scene.  The  tarpaulin  coverings  around  the spraying
process have  proven totally inadequate in confining the
asbestos, with the asbestos sifting out from under the
canvas to blow loosely about the streets. It is normally
both amosite and  chrysotile asbestos, mixed with rock
wool, glass fibres, and often plaster in order to make it
fireproof, so that  plaster dust today contains a heavy
asbestos  burden (44). What is  the effect  of the public
being exposed to  such a mixture  in  the  air over the
several  weeks  or  months such construction  takes,
considering the fact some persons live as well as work in
the vicinity of such construction?
  This is not an easy question to answer. First of all,
many Americans are mobile. That is, they may live near
such a construction site, but their work, recreation, or
other activity may  cause them to be absent during the
hours of construction activity. Others may be employed
by a firm in the vicinity, but their conditions may cause
them to be elsewhere or may take them in or out of the
area. Furthermore, the increasing use of air conditioning
acts to screen  out  from  interior  rooms the asbestos
fibres. Very few Americans would  get the exposure of
South African laborers who both lived and worked near
asbestos, lacked mobility, and hence  were massively
exposed.  But  even  brief exposure  to  asbestos  has
sometimes been sufficient to initiate the disease  (in one
case,  a  six-week  temporary  job  wrapping  asbestos
insulation  around  heating   pipes  triggered  a
mesothelioma  fatal 23 years  later)  (45),  and  a
no-exposure level for the general public would be best.
After all,  the  best  efforts  will not prevent present
generations from inhaling more asbestos than previous
generations;  and  exposure  of  school children  is
particularly to be avoided since exposure at an early age
produces poorer prognostications than at later ages.
  Because of the impossiblity under current technology
of sampling and measuring asbestos in the ambient air or
in  emission  gases,  the  regulations  of  the EPA  are
expressed as requirements for the operation of specific
control equipment  or, where  no control  equipment is
available,  through  prohibition  of the use of asbestos
(46). This is justified since  the most dangerous asbestos
particles  are  the submicroscopic  and highly respirable
variety which cannot be seen  and whose presence may
be unknown except as the individual may suffer a vague
respiratory discomfort current with inhaling them (47).
The consequence of such an approach is  the emphasis
that  must  be  put  upon  the  maintenance  of  the
equipment, the adequacy of inspection, and the reaction
of the  legal machinery in its  willingness  to impose
serious civil consequences  upon equipment users  who
have failed to maintain it and whose failure has caused
harm to individuals. The trouble with this last approach
for effectiveness has two aspects: The individual either
not knowing of his exposure or else not remembering or
relating the exposure  to the harm  (said unawareness
extending to his physician in terms of diagnosis) and the
time lag  between exposure  and onset of the disease
producing burdens of proof (48).
  Americans are not a maintenance prone culture.  Any
system which puts its reliance  in maintenance of an
equipment system and bureaucratic inspection to keep
the maintainers up to minimal standard is a system that
is  in  for more failures than  successes,  if  previous
experience in other areas is a guide. Further,  many of
the contractors  who work with asbestos are often the
sort  of  undercapitalized,  transient,  indifferent
entrepreneurs  most  likely to become scofflaws.  The
result is that the public risk  from asbestos is  likely to
remain high until technology gets much better.

BERYLLIUM
  The  third hazardous air pollutant nationally singled
out by the  EPA under the Clean Air Act is beryllium.
Industry  long resisted  the allegation  that the use of
beryllium in industrial  processes  could  be productive of
any  long-term  adverse effect leading to permanently
debilitating  illness. I recall observing, in the mid-1960's
in northeastern Pennsylvania, a series of  workmen's
compensation  hearings  before a  Commonwealth
examiner  in which employers conceded the  cause of
"Black   Lung."  But  they  vigorously  resisted   the
imputation  that the  claims made for compensation for
illness imputed to beryllium were allowable on the  basis
of the innocence  of the mineral. For this reason, the
courts  allowed counsel for claimants  to introduce into
evidence,  through the medium of hypothetical questions
put  to  experts called  by the  claimant,  whether  a
"conference of chemists and medical men had made any
definite finding that beryllium  was the sole  cause of
berylliosis." By the  end  of the  decade this was  a
recognized illness  for purposes of compensation under
workmen's compensation laws (49).
  The danger to the public was harder to establish, but  it
was  finally  determined  that  those residing near plants
employing  beryllium  were  in considerable danger.
Indeed, as industrial hygiene improved within the plants,
their dangers were probably greater than the workers.
This is not  an unusual phenomenon. Once the cause of
an industrial illness is  established, the insurance carrier
of the employer becomes insistent upon alterations in
industrial processes to mitigate extent of liability.  Also
the  chances go up  markedly for  an employer,  who
refuses to respond to  this pressure, to be liable for the
far greater coverage  of gross negligence or reckless and
wanton misconduct under the common law of tort. The

-------
184
CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
result is better conditions for the workers than prevail
for the  residents living in houses within several hundred
feet of the plant.
  The "known major sources of beryllium are extraction
plants, machine shops and foundries handling beryllium
or  beryllium-containing alloys,  ceramic  plants  using
beryllium, rocket propellants containing beryllium, and
incinerators burning beryllium-containing  waste" (50).
Because of the value of berylh'um to harden substances
to  which it is added, its presence is common and likely
to  increase so that  the above list is  one that indicates
fairly  common  contact with  the general public.  It
indicates  further some difficulty  in enforcing any laws
designed to protect the public or, if protection  fails,  to
guarantee the person hurt a financially responsible entity
to be the respondent in any damage action. In the latter
regard,  it does very little good to make liability for harm
clear  when  the  one  liable  is  not  capable of fiscal
responsibility.

LESSER TRACE METALS
  Other trace metals are of sufficiently narrow  impact,
or  their  consequences up  to this  point sufficiently
unknown, so to  treat  them  individually would  be
unsupported  by  adequate legal materials. Chrome dust,
for example,  is a serious problem in industrial processes,
but it has not been one that much affects  the public  at
large   by any  deteriorating  of  the   atmosphere.
Nevertheless,  the  Federal  Occupational   Health  and
Safety  Act has  a  table of air contaminants including
chromium, copper,  iron  (oxides),  lead   compounds,
nickel, tin, zinc compounds, and others (51). One of the
problems is the sharp increase in the use of certain trace
metals in industrial processes which were unknown until
very recently. For example, vanadium is now used in 18
compounds of itself in a wide variety of commercial
processes (52). What is the  effect of it?  People have
always had traces of vanadium in their systems but now
it is increasing.  What this means is simply not known
medically and will  not be  until more  experience  is
accumulated — experience which  could be good or bad.
  Most  of these trace metals are included for purposes  of
legal and public concern  under the rubric of "toxic
substance," which of course is a far larger category than
trace  metals. In  his   1971  Environmental Message,
President Nixon proposed that the EPA be empowered
to restrict the use or distribution of any substance which
the EPA Administrator finds is a hazard to human health
or  the  environment  (53). This was  a rather sweeping
delegation of legislative powers, but  analogous to what
has happened in workmen's  compensation legislation
where   the  legislatures have  stopped  listing  specific
diseases or causes of disease and have gone  over, instead,
to merely indicating that all illness contracted in  relation
to  employment  is  compensable.  In his  1972
Environmental Message, the President proposed  a Toxic
Wastes   Disposal  Control  Act  which,   under EPA
                                           supervision, would establish Federal guidelines for state
                                           programs to regulate the disposal of harmful wastes (54).
                                             This type of concern at the  chief executive level is
                                           correlated  to  concern  at lower  federal bureaucratic
                                           levels.  The United States  Bureau  of Mines has  a
                                           metallurgy program based upon the need to maximize
                                           the  efficiency  of metallic  use and  to minimize  the
                                           quantities discharged  as pollutants and  wasted in  the
                                           industrial  process  (55).  The  metals  specifically
                                           mentioned are  zinc and lead, but it would be equally
                                           applicable to others, particularly as it becomes evident
                                           that the bulk of  supply for some metals in  the future
                                           will be from recycling and reclaiming processes (56). The
                                           United  States  Department  of Transportation has  a
                                           Hazardous Materials Regulations Board which has issued
                                           an  advance notice of  proposed  rule making which
                                           classifies certain hazardous materials on the basis of their
                                           health  hazards; and these must include at least some of
                                           the  trace  metals (57).  The  Federal Council  on
                                           Environmental Quality issued in April 1971 a booklet on
                                           toxic substances,  pointing out their dangers and urging
                                           measures be taken to control the harmful side effects in
                                           their careless employment. Other  examples could be
                                           pointed out in the federal structure  of similar import
                                           since, once interest is high in the executive, judicial, and
                                           legislative  branches of the government, it is evident that
                                           the  administrators must  indicate  a   zeal at least  as
                                           significant as shown by those who generate the basic
                                           decisions,  statutes, or  orders within  which the daily
                                           routines of public administration must  be  carried on
                                           (58). Whatever  their historic inadequacies, it is  the
                                           administrators who properly belong in the front line of
                                           the public's defense against the sort of risks posed by
                                           trace metals in the environment.
                                             The  law, as  is to be expected from  a discipline
                                           responding to outside  pressures, has many  avenues to
                                           resolving similar problems. Its relations with trace metals
                                           are no different in this respect. Just as one would look in
                                           the  indices  under   "toxic  materials"  as  well  as
                                           atmospheric pollution,  water  waste  control, or  the
                                           names of the individual metals themselves, so also would
                                           one  consider the heading "hazardous substances"  or
                                           "dangerous properties of industrial materials" or similar
                                           language which occurred at some time  to those pushing
                                           for  a  legal response  to a  health or  environmental
                                           challenge. Often the legislative response is a narrow one,
                                           as in the  Hazardous Substances Act, which  does  not
                                           cover the  raw materials  from which household products
                                           or toys are made (59), or in  the old Water Pollution
                                           Control Act which authorized the President to designate
                                           hazardous substances  and  to  recommend methods for
                                           their  removal  from  the water (60). Anyone  doing
                                           research in this area must consider such statutes as these
                                           if he is to cast his legal  investigative net wide enough to
                                           be sufficient. Too narrow a point of inquiry will not cut
                                           an aperture wide enough to be useful.

-------
                                                                   LAW AND TRACE METALS
                                                                                                      185
CONCLUSIONS
  Indeed, perhaps this paper suffers  from this  very
narrowness against  which  I warn. As I  said  at  the
beginning, trace metals are generic in their problems to
all situations in which some small quantity is discharged
into the  environment  by an economic  activity.  In this
case, environment includes air, water, soil, and the living
cells,  which,  paradoxically, must count in the cells of
what  Claude Bernard  called the "interior milieu"  of
humankind. Probably it is impossible in this situation to
make any final separation of issues of human health and
environmental fitness. For this reason, at one time, both
public health and environmental law were so close as to
be the same; and only the growing complexity of each,
acting to prevent any  one scholar from  mastering them,
has forced their separation one from the  other.
  In any comments on trace metals and the law, there is
an  interlocking of workmen's compensation, industrial
hygiene, and  environmental  protection that makes it
very difficult to steer safely through. Probably, from the
lawyer's  viewpoint,  the subject trace  metals, or even
trace substances, is one that is insufficiently legalistic in
its  conceptualization;  and  for  lawyers such terms as
negligence, reasonable  risk, etc. would be easier  to deal
with. However, subjects do not agitate society in the
language that they perturb  lawyers. Often, therefore, it
is necessary to address the  problem in words that are
clumsy   to  the  lawyer  but  which express what is
uppermost in the mind of the public. The risks of trace
metals are among these. Clumsy as this  paper is because
of this fact, nevertheless I believe the effort was worth
making, slight as the result may be.
REFERENCES
  1. Technology  Assessment,   1970.  Hearings,
       Subcommittee  on Science, Research  and
       Development,  House Committee on Science and
       Astronautics, 91st Cong., 2nd Sess., No. 21, May
       20,21, 26, 27; June 2, 3,1970.
  2. Taylor, G.  R., The Doomsday Book, 94-97 (with
       citations of sources on p. 301),  1970; Arvill, R.,
       Man and His  Environment  (rev. ed.)  92, 94,
       1969;  Rienow, R.,  with L. T. Rienow, Man
       Against His Environment, ch. 17, 1970. These
       are  popular  works  dealing with   these
       environmental situations.
  3. Asbestos  may  be either an amphibole or  a
       serpentine. Modern commercial  asbestos in the
       United  States  is a mixture, commonly amosite
       and chrysotile respectively.
  4. Traditionally, according to  Cato, the  Romans had
       fortified their wine  with brine, so the  fashion
       was long established for a metallic aftertaste and,
       possibly,  even  the  effects  of over salting the
       system  by ingestion of the brine along with the
       dehydration from the alcohol,  Mommsen, T.,
       History of Rome, vol. Ill, 123,1894.
 5. The  use  of  lead  (for  whiteness),  arsenic (for
       smoothness), and antimony  (for  lustre)  in
       cosmetics was common, while  belladonna (for
       enlarged pupils and shining eyes) was used in the
       Renaissance. The risks in  modern cosmetics are
       quite different, May, B.,  How  to Live  in Our
       Polluted World, 36 et seq., 1970.
 6.4  CCH Clean  Air  and  Water News, 629-630,
       September 28,1972.
 7. Rubinov, I. M., The Quest for Security, 81,1934.
 8. Churchman, W. H., The Air We  Breathe,  1871,
       recounts industrial air conditions of the day.
 9. Rubinow, op. cit., 83, reciting the five stages in legal
       response leading to a  compensation  system that
       were present in both Europe and America.
10. Arvill, op. cit., 98-99.
11. An interesting survey is Cleaning Our Environment, a
       Report  of the  American  Chemical Society,
       Subcommittee on Environmental Improvement,
       Committee  on  Chemistry and Public Affairs,
       1969, especially 26, 128-131,  and  176 for the
       presence of trace metals in air  pollution, waste
       water renovation, and solid waste.
12. See West's Key Numbers, Workmen's Compensation,
       527 (inhalation of fumes, gas, and particles); 538
       (lung diseases); and 549 (occupational diseases in
       particular).
13. A 27 - city  United States Public Health  Service
       Study  revealed 400,000  children  had
       dangerously high lead levels in their blood. Of
       the  black  children  surveyed 33 percent  and of
       the  white 11 percent had  such levels, leading to
       theorization  about  cultural  and  genetic
       differences  in susceptibility, New York Times,
       21, June 15,1972.
14. Bryan, E. H., Quality of Storm Water Drainage from
       Urban  Land, 8 Water  Resources Bull,  578,
       583-588,1972.
15. Professor  Lourie  described  his  research  at  the
       International Seminar on Human Settlements,
       held July  20, 1972, at the Athens Center of
       Ekistics, Athens,  Greece. He  is  professor  of
       psychiatry  and  child health and development,
       George Washington University, Washington, D.
       C.
16. 42 USCA sec. 4801 (P. L. 91-695, 84 Stat. 2078).
17.42 CFR Part  90;  36 F. R. 21833 (November 16,
       1971).  The United States Dept. of Housing and
       Urban  Development  on  February  18,  1972,
       temporarily exempted itself from its own similar
       regulation, New York Times, 11, April 24,1972,
       "pending study  on best methods of eradicating
       lead-based poisoning."
18.21 CFR Part  191; 36 F. R. 20985 (October 28,
       1971).
19. 36 F. R. 20936.
20. HB  16267, to amend the  Lead  Based  Poisoning

-------
186
CYCLING AND CONTROL OF METALS
       Prevention Act; referred to House Banking and
       Currency Committee.
21. Columbus  Dispatch,  41A-4,  January  17,  1971,
       quoting Oil  Daily  and  John Huemmerich,
       executive  director,  National  Congress  of
       Petroleum Retailers.
22. This  appeared  in  The  President's  1971
       Environmental Program (March 1971), excerpted
       in  Reitze, A.  W., Jr., Environmental Law (2nd
       ed.) Ill, 74-75, 1972. See also the president's
       1971   environmental  message  in  BNA
       Environmental Reporter, 21:0322,  February 8,
       1971.
23. 28 Cong. Q. Wkly Rep. 2254, (September 18,  1970).
24. BNA Environmental Reporter, 21:0429 (February 8,
       1972).
25.42 USCA sec.  1857f-6c, PL 91-604, and 81 Stat.
       502, sec. 210. The Clean Air Act first passed in
       1962  and  its  predecessor  the  Air Pollution
       Control  Act  in 1955.  See  40 CFR Part 79,
       Subpart  B, 36 F.  R.  22419 (November 25,
       1971).
26. 40 CFR Part 80;  37 FR 3882 (February  17,  1972).
27. Reitze, op. cit.,  Ill, 74.
28. BNA Environmental Reporter, 31:2641  (February
       22, 1972).
29. Reitze, op. cit.,  Ill, 75-76.
30. Senate Bill 3136,  to amend the Federal Food, Drug,
       and Cosmetic Act.  Its  companion  bill  is HB
       12,958, introduced by Congressman Horton.
31. Ohio v. Wyandotte Chemicals Corp. et al, 401 U. S.
       493,1971.
32. Croft, C. D., Mercury's Run-in With Ecology, Wall
       Street Journal, 22, May 22,1972.
33. See the  National Geographic  Magazine, vol. 142,
       507-527,   October  1972, Putman,  J.  J.,
       Quicksilver  and Slow Death.
34. Croft, op. cit.
35. Dr. Edwin  Wilmsen of the University of Michigan
       found, in fish samples ranging in age from  300 to
       2000 years, levels of mercury similar to those in
       today's fish, New York Times, 16, December 28,
       1971.
36.40 CFR, Part  61; 36  FR 23239 (November  30,
       1971), pursuant to sec. 112 of the Clean Air Act
       as  amended,  42 USCA 1857, P. L. 91-604, 84
       Stat. 1705.
37. Brodeur, P., Asbestos and Enzymes, 14, 27,1972.
38. West's  Key  Numbers,  Workmen's  Compensation
       1396 (on medical testimony in general), 1392
       (claimant's  testimony), 1509 (lung diseases).
39. For example, H.  B. 2516, Asbestos Workers  Health
       Protection Act, to promote the safety of workers
       engaged in  making asbestos  products,  which
       illustrates proposed legislation.
40. Occupational Safety and Health Standards, 29 CFR
       1910.93a (asbestos dust); revised 37  F. R. 332,
                                                (January 18, 1972), 11320, (June 6,1972). The
                                                Occupational  Safety and  Health Act  is in 29
                                                USCA sec.  651 et  seq.; P. L. 91-596; 84 Stats.
                                                1590.
                                          41. See, United States Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor
                                                Standards,  Part   1518,  Safety  and  Health
                                                Regulations  for  Construction:  Standard  for
                                                Exposure to  Asbestos  Dust,  36 F. R. 23207
                                                (December 7,  1971).
                                          42. The National Academy of Science  on October 8,
                                                1971  warned  that  the major  sources  of
                                                man-processed  asbestos  emission  must  be
                                                controlled   "or  asbestos  ambient  air
                                                concentration in some localities would approach
                                                those encountered  by workers in  the  asbestos
                                                industry," Reitze, op. cit., Ill, 11.
                                          43. As of February 23, 1972 in New York City "the
                                                spraying  of  fireproofing  materials containing
                                                asbestos on the structural steel of buildings" was
                                                banned and similar bans in 1972 were imposed in
                                                Boston,  Chicago, and Philadelphia, Brodeur, op.
                                                cit., 137.
                                          44. Ibid., 49.
                                          45. Ibid., 47-48.
                                          46. 40 CFR, Part I; 36 F. R. 23239 (December 7,1971).
                                          47. Brodeur, op. cit., 50,  citing Dr. Irving J.  Sslikoff,
                                                director,  Environmental Sciences Laboratory,
                                                Mount Sinai School of Medicine, City University
                                                of New York.
                                          48. Remember the  burden of proof is generally on the
                                                claimant  to show   the harm is compensable,
                                                Aetna Cas. etc. cc.  v. Jenhuson, (Tex. Civ. App.,
                                                1971), 469 S.W.2d 423.
                                          49. Ricciutti v.  Sylvania Electric Products (Mass.),  178
                                                N. E. 2d 657 (1961). See also Biglioli v. Durotest
                                                Corp., (N. J.  Super. Ct., App. Div.), 129 A. 2d
                                                727,1957.
                                          50. 40 CFR, Part I, 36 F. R. 23239 (December 7,1971).
                                          51. 29 CFR, Part 1910, subpart G  (Occupational Health
                                                and Environmental  Control), sec. 1910.93; Table
                                                amended 37 F. R. 11320 (June 6, 1972).
                                          52. Reitze, op. cit., IV, 87.
                                          53. BNA Environmental Reporter, 21:0324 (February 8
                                                1971).
                                          54. Ibid., 21:0422.
                                          55. Ibid., 51:4305.
                                          56. McHale, J., The Future of the Future, 225, 1969,
                                                citing R.  Buckminster  Fuller.  See  also  the
                                                remarks of Max Spendlove, director of research,
                                                United  States  Bureau  of  Mines Metallurgy
                                                Research Center on the 250 to 300 million tons
                                                of annual urban refuse as a source of materials,
                                                Columbus Citizen-Journal, 4, October 17  1972
                                          57. 49 CFR Parts 170-189; 35 FR 8831 (June 5,'\970).
                                          58. See Sax, N. I., with Dunn, M. S., et al., Dangerous
                                                Properties of Industrial Materials (3rd ed  1968)
                                          59. 15 USCA 1261-73;P.L. 91-601; 84 Stat. 273.

-------
                                                                   LAW AND TRACE METALS         187


60.33  USCA 1162,  Federal Water  Pollution Control           October 18,  1972, P. L. 92-500, are sees.  115
       Act, sec. 12, added in 1970, P. L. 91-224, sec.           (in-place  toxic pollutants), 307 (toxic  and
       102; Reitze, op. cit., IV, 81-82. The provisions           pre-treatment effluent standards), and 31 l(b) (2)
       of the new Federal Water Pollution Control Act,    	(A) (hazardous substances).
                                                         I wish  to thank my student, Mr. David Monroe, for his
                                                         assistance.

-------