EPA/AA/EOD/90-01
Technical Report
CO/CO2 NDIR Analyzer Replacement
by
Aaron D. McCarthy
and
Carl J. Ryan
April, 1990
NOTICE
Technical Reports do not necessarily represent final EPA decisions or positions. They
are intended to present technical analysis of issues using data which are currently
available. The purpose in the release of such reports is to facilitate the exchange of
technical information and to inform the public of technical developments which
may form the basis for a final EPA decision, position or regulatory action.
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air and Radiation
Office of Mobile Sources
Engineering Operations Division
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, MI 48105
-------
EPA/AA/EOD/90-01
Technical Report
CO/C02 NDIR Analyzer Replacement
by
Aaron D. McCarthy
and
Carl J. Ryan
April, 1990
NOTICE
Technical Reports do not necessarily represent final EPA decisions or positions. They
are intended to present technical analysis of issues using data which are currently
available. The purpose in the release of such reports is to facilitate the exchange of
technical information and to inform the public of technical developments which
may form the basis for a final EPA decision, position or regulatory action.
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air and Radiation
Office of Mobile Sources
Engineering Operations Division
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, MI 48105
-------
Table of Contents
I. Abstract 2
II. Executive Summary 3
III. Introduction 4
IV. Preliminary Investigation 5
Summary 5
Test Description 6
Results/Observations/Conclusions 7
V. First C02 Comparison Study 8
Summary 8
Test Description 8
Results/Observations/Conclusions 9
Vehicle Exhaust Comparison 9
Water Vapor Interference Investigation 10
Analyzer Sensitivity to Barometer Changes 11
Wet Precision '. 11
Curve Check Summary Statistics 11
VI. Second C02 Comparison Study 12
Summary 12
Discussion of Analyzer Selections for Study 13
Water Vapor Interference Investigation 14
Vehicle Exhaust Bag C02 Comparison 15
Analysis of Vehicle Exhaust Bag C02 Measurement Differences 17
Description of Calibration Gases Used in the Study 18
Calibration Curve Variability 18
Background Level C02 Measurement Comparison 20
VII. EPCN Process Coordination/Implementation 21
VIII. Installation Chronology 21
Gas Lab 21
Light Duty 21
E&D 21
Heavy Duty 22
IX. Other Changes 22
Flow Rate 22
Bench Plumbing 22
Sample Analysis Correlation (SAC) Revision 22
X. Overall Discussion of Study Results 23
CO 23
C02 23
XI. List Of Attachments 25
-------
I. Abstract
The EPA Motor Vehicle Emissions Laboratory (MVEL) makes
extensive use of gas analyzers employing nondispersive infrared
(NDIR) technology for the determination of carbon monoxide (CO)
and carbon dioxide (C02) concentrations. The analyzers, primarily
used for measurements of CO and C02 in automotive emissions, are
also used for ambient level measurements and gas standards
procedures.
The MVEL has replaced all vehicle emission measurement system
Bendix 8501-5C CO and MSA 202 CO and C02 analyzers with Horiba
Instruments, Inc., AIA-23 CO and C02 analyzers. A total of 30
analyzers were purchased to upgrade the Light Duty, Heavy Duty,
Evaluation & Development, and Master Sites.
This report summarizes the various evaluation and comparison
testing performed as part of the analyzer procurement and the
Equipment/Procedure Change Notice (EPCN 170) process. Included in
this report is information that has already been released in EPCN
170, as well as additional information needed to completely
document the project.
The Horiba CO analyzers were approved for MVEL use based on
the pre-purchase test data supplied by Horiba and on the results
of a preliminary in-house investigation of CO measurement
differences between old and new analyzers.
The Horiba C02 analyzers were approved for MVEL use based on
the pre-purchase test data supplied by Horiba and on the results
of an in-house C02 measurement comparison study between old and
new analyzers. The significant finding of the C02 comparison
testing indicated an average shift in C02 measurements of -0.53%
between Horiba and the MSA analyzers (average percent-of-point
difference between corrected concentrations, Horiba reading
lower). This result was obtained from statistical analyses of
simultaneous measurements made on vehicle exhaust. Investigative
testing indicated that water vapor interference occurring on the
MSA analyzer was contributing to the observed C02 measurement
shift.
The results of the evaluation and comparison testing
documented in this report and in EPCN #70 show that the Horiba
NDIR analyzers meet the functional requirements and produce
measurements comparable to the old analyzers.
-------
II. Executive Summary
As early as 1984, the Engineering Operations Division had
plans for a large scale NDIR analyzer replacement. Problems with
the Bendix and MSA CO and C02 analyzers, such as out-of-tolerance
water vapor interference, electrical output noise, and other
performance deficiencies, required an increasing amount of minor
repairs. This situation, coupled with a decreasing amount of
manufacturer support (e.g.., some spare parts were no longer
available) underscored the need for new analyzers. Funding for
the new analyzers was obtained in 1986.
The analyzer procurement documented'in this report resulted
in the purchase of Horiba AIA-23 CO and C02 analyzers. These
analyzers were designed specifically for automotive emission
applications and are used extensively by automotive manufacturers.
This was not true of the MSA and Bendix analyzers which were
designed for nonautomotive process control applications and
ambient monitoring of hazardous locations, such as mineshafts.
The process of approving the new analyzers for MVEL use began
with a review of results from performance testing required by the
EPA procurement contract. The manufacturer was required to
perform and document valid calibrations, water vapor interference
checks (CO analyzers only), and determinations of repeatability,
electrical output noise, curve nonlinearities, zero/span drift,
and response times for each analyzer. The test results showed
that all the analyzers demonstrated compliance with the pre-
purchase test criteria.
The EPA internal approval process called for preparation of
an Equipment/Procedure Change Notice (EPCN) which documented
significant effects on MVEL testing resulting from the analyzer
replacement. A series of comparison tests was performed on the
old and new analyzers to detect and quantify measurement
differences. The final tests compared C02 measurements very
precisely on Range 23 (0-2.5%) only. CO analyzer comparisons were
found to be acceptable during the preliminary investigation.
The results of the comparisons indicated that the Horiba
analyzers used in the study exhibited better precision during
calibration curve generation, decreased sensitivity to known
interferants and changes in barometric pressure, reduced
electrical output noise, and less zero/span drift than their
comparison study counterparts.
The Horiba NDIR CO and C02 analyzers were approved for use at
MVEL based on the information contained in EPCN #70. This
information was part of, but did not completely document, the
overall project work. This report documents the entire NDIR CO
and C02 analyzer project. The EPCN #70 cover page is shown in
Attachment A.
-------
III. Introduction
The Laboratory Projects Group was assigned the task of
coordinating the procurement of new NDIR CO/C02 analyzers in June
of 1986. All MVEL CO and C02 analyzers used for bag analysis
(bench mounted) were to be replaced. The primary .reason for the
procurement was that the MSA and Bendix NDIR analyzers were
obsolete and some spare parts were no longer available. A total
of 30 analyzers, including spares, were to be ordered. This
included analyzers for Light Duty, Heavy Duty, E&D, and the Master
Site. A table listing the number of CO and C02 analyzers to be
replaced, their locations, and ranges is shown in Attachment B.
Analyzers employing NDIR technology were researched from
several manufacturers. A list of performance specifications and
required salient features was compiled for the procurement
documentation (see Attachment C). This list not only included
specifications and desirable features resulting from the research
of new analyzers, but also from CFR requirements and other EPA
performance specifications. We wished to obtain documented
verification of these parameters, so the performance
specifications were defined and written in the form of test
criteria to be met. More elaborate descriptions of the required
performance tests (see Attachment C) were included in the
procurement package to ensure valid measurements.
Beckman Industrial Corp., Horiba Instruments, Inc.,
Westinghouse/Maihak Div., and Combustion Engineering, Inc., were
listed as suggested sources. These manufacturers were sent
"Request for Quotation" documents which included our
specifications. An advertisement was also listed for 30 days in
The Commerce Business Daily to solicit additional bids. Horiba
submitted the low bid of $101,377.86 and was awarded the contract
in August of 1986.
The process of approving the Horiba NDIR CO/C02 analyzers for
MVEL use began with a review of results from performance testing
required by the EPA contract. Each analyzer had undergone three
sets of performance tests, one for each range setting. The
manufacturer was required to perform and document valid
calibrations, water vapor interference checks (CO analyzers only),
and determinations of repeatability, electrical output noise,
curve nonlinearities, zero/span drift, and response times. The
actual test specifications and results for the analyzers are
listed in Attachment D. The test results showed that all the
analyzers demonstrated compliance with the pre-purchase test
criteria. Horiba was authorized to deliver the analyzers in March
of 1987.
-------
IV. Preliminary Investigation
Summary
Once the analyzers had been delivered, a preliminary
investigation was performed to detect possible measurement
differences between the Horiba analyzers and the MSA and Bendix
analyzers being replaced. This investigation did not constitute a
full measurement comparison, but did indicate where further study
was warranted. The testing for this investigation took place in
June of 1987.
Analyzer agreement on vehicle exhaust bag sets was studied as
well as agreement on bags generated for the Sample Analysis
Correlation (SAC) process (a mixture of cylinder gases blended
together in a sample bag and then analyzed on all MVEL vehicle
test sites as a diagnostic test). The data consisted of
simultaneous measurements taken on old and new analyzers.
Comparisons were performed on all ranges that were to be
calibrated and actively used.
CO and C02 measurement differences calculated from the SAC
bag comparison data were used to generate means and confidence
intervals on the means. In three of the five range comparisons, a
statistically valid bias could not be discerned.
The data obtained from vehicle exhaust bag readings showed
statistically valid biases. Both positive and negative biases
were observed. The following two tables summarize the results of
the preliminary investigation.
SAC Bag Comparison Results
Statistics Computed For % Diff.
% Diff = [(H.R. - O.A.R.)/O.A.R.] x 100
H.R. = Horiba Reading
O.A.R. = Old Analyzer Reading
CO Rancre Comparisons
Horiba R18 vs. Bendix R17
Horiba RIB vs. Bendix R19
Horiba R20 vs. MSA R20
CO2 Range Comparisons
Horiba R22 vs. MSA R22
Horiba R23 vs. MSA R23
N
9
4
1
9
5
MZN
-2.21
-0.96
-2.43
-1.6
-1.15
MAX
1.01
-0.04
-2.43
0.25
0.62
MEAN
-1.03
-0.29
-2.43
-0.23
0.035
SDEV
0.98
0.45
0.59
0.72
95% Conf . Interval
-1.79 < (I
-------
Vehicle Exhaust Bag Comparison Results
Statistics Computed For % Diff.
% Diff = [(H.C.C. - O.A.C.CJ/O.A.C.C.] x 100
H.C.C. = Horiba Corrected Concentration
O.A.C.C. = Old Analyzer Corrected Concentration
CO Range Comparisons
Horiba R16 vs. Bendix R17
Horiba R18 vs. Bendix R19
Horiba R20 vs. MSA R20
C02 Range Comparisons
Horiba R22 vs. MSA R22
Horiba R23 vs. MSA R23
Horiba R24 vs. MSA R24
N
6
6
6
6
9
6
MIN
-4.36
-1.75
-5.08
0.042
-0.09
-1.32
MAX
-1.86
-0.53
-3.68
1.05
1.55
-0.52
MEAN
-2.75
-0.97
-4.4
0.4
0.61
-1.03
SDEV
0.93
0.47
0.56
0.36
0.56
0.32
95% Conf .Interval
-3.72 < li < -1.78
-1.47 < \i £ ^0.48
-4.99 < H < -3.81
0.02 < H £ 0.78
0.18 < M. < 1.05
-1.36 < \i < -0.69
R16 =
R17 =
R18 =
R19 =
R20 =
R22 =
R23 =
R24 =
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
- 100 ppm
- 250 ppm
- 500 ppm
- 1000 ppm
- 2500 ppm
- 1.0%
- 2.5%
- 5.0%
Test Description
A special bench was constructed, containing a set of three
Horiba NDIR analyzers (LCO, HCO, C02). These analyzers were
identical to those which would be installed in the certification
test sites. The bench was tied into Site A202 so that
simultaneous measurements could be made on the old and new
analyzer pairs. The sample flow rate supplied to the Horiba
instruments was adjusted to 3.0 SCFH, versus the 6.0 SCFH flow
rate supplied to the old NDIR analyzers. The ranges used on the
Horiba Low CO analyzer were R16 (0-100 ppm) and R18 (0-500 ppm),
and were being compared to the Bendix analyzer's R17 (0-250 ppm)
and R19 (0-1000 ppm) ranges, respectively. These changes were
planned as part of the NDIR replacement, and therefore became a
constraint on any comparison testing. Hardware provisions
(voltmeter, strip/chart) were made to record analyzer output, and
the Horiba analyzers were then calibrated.
Vehicle exhaust samples were generated using MVEL vehicles
and standard driving schedules. The samples were measured
simultaneously on corresponding analyzer pairs. To quickly check
agreement at other portions of the analyzer ranges, the exhaust
samples were repeatedly diluted and remeasured. The initial
background reading was used to correct the initial and
subsequently diluted sample readings. In general, agreement on
corresponding ranges of each analyzer pair was measured at six
different points, the only exception being C02 Range 23 (0-2.5%),
where nine points along the range were compared.
-------
Simultaneous SAC bag readings were taken on the old and new
analyzers during the normal SAC schedule rounds. Readings from
the Horiba analyzers were compared to those from the old analyzers
but were not included in the calculated SAC statistics.
Resuits/Observations/Conclusions
The preliminary investigation data indicated that small but
statistically valid measurement differences existed between the
old and new NDIR analyzers. The measurement biases were observed
primarily on analyses of vehicle exhaust. One valid bias was
observed in the SAC bag analyses. The measurement differences are
documented in the tables shown in the summary.
The CO measurement comparisons performed on vehicle exhaust
during the preliminary investigation documented mean differences
that ranged from approximately -1.0% to -4.0% of point. However,
the CO comparison data set needs some further qualifying.
Two of the three range comparisons were interrange, meaning
that the comparisons were between different ranges. This
reflected the proposed CO range changes.
The largest mean difference was observed in the CO (Range
20) comparison. The MSA high CO analyzer was found to exhibit an
unacceptable amount of water vapor interference during a follow-up
test. This meant that the instrument was giving abnormally high
responses to humid samples. Since in the high CO comparison the
MSA was reading higher than the Horiba, we concluded that we could
expect somewhat better analyzer agreement between the two MVEL
high CO analyzer populations.
The primary goal of the preliminary investigation and the
subsequent comparison studies was to document measurement
differences between MSA/Bendix and Horiba NDIR analyzers. More
specifically, we were interested in the possible impact on fuel
economy determination. Since fuel economy calculations are
relatively insensitive to changes in CO measurement, it was
concluded that the results of the preliminary investigation were
fully adequate for operational approval of the Horiba CO
analyzers.
Conversely, because of the "large role" of C02 in fuel
economy determination, we felt that the C02 data were insufficient
to completely quantify the possible impact. We decided that a
more tightly controlled C02 comparison study was warranted.
-------
V. First C02 Comparison Study
Summary
A comparison study of C02 analyzer agreement was designed,
and the Calibration and Maintenance Group began taking data in
December of 1987. The study focused on a comparison of several
vehicle exhaust bag sets. Procedures and precautions used for the
control of the study included taking simultaneous readings
(calibrations, zero/span, sampling) on both analyzers, daily curve
checks at mid-span, and analyzer plumbing dimensions and
components as similar to production test benches as possible.
Statistically valid measurement biases between the analyzers
were again observed while measuring vehicle exhaust. This
contrasted with very good agreement observed during calibration
curve generation. We began to suspect that water vapor
interference was contributing to the change in agreement between
the two situations.
Data was taken in an attempt to discern and characterize any
water vapor interference. Water vapor interference data was taken
not only on the study analyzers, but also on several other MVEL
MSA and Horiba NDIR C02 analyzers (total: 5 MSA and 4 Horiba
analyzers). The data indicated that the MSA analyzer used in the
first study had an abnormally high and unrepresentative response
to water vapor. This finding compromised the validity of the
vehicle exhaust data by implying that the measurement bias
observed was larger than, and unrepresentative of, the true bias.
However, an attempt was made to correct the vehicle exhaust
comparison data based on the water vapor interference data.
Correction factors were developed for each C02 range and applied
to the vehicle exhaust data.
The data from the study were incorporated into a first draft
package for the EPCN process. The draft EPCN was then circulated
for comments. After reviewing the returned comments, we decided
that a second comparison study would have to be performed using an
MSA analyzer more representative of the MSA analyzer "population."
Portions of the study remained valid, however, and for that reason
we felt a description of the study was warranted here.
Test Description
The setup consisted of a pair of Horiba and MSA C02 analyzers
in a special module (19" rack) tied into the analyzer bench
located on Site A002. The two C02 analyzers were plumbed in
parallel to make simultaneous measurement possible. Care was
taken to ensure that line lengths and related components (valves,
etc.) were as similar to the production testing benches as
possible. The supplied flow rates were, as before, 6.0 SCFH to
-------
the MSA and 3.0 SCFH to the Horiba. All calibration gas and
sample readings were taken with calibrated digital voltmeters.
All readings (calibration gases, zero/span gases,
sample/background gases) were taken simultaneously on both
analyzers. Curves were generated on all three ranges of each
analyzer.
The study compared several vehicle exhaust bag sets.
Repeated readings of the bag sets were taken on each analyzer to
estimate the precision of the instruments when measuring vehicle
exhaust. A mid-span C02 cylinder was read daily, following
zero/span procedures, to detect curve shifts. The curve shift
data was later used to provide comparisons of accuracy and
sensitivity to changes in barometric pressure.
Data was also generated on all bench-mounted NDIR CO2
analyzers to discern and characterize any water vapor
interference. A total of five MSA and four Horiba C02 analyzers
were included in the water vapor interference investigation. The
data was generated by routing C02 calibration gases through a
bubbler apparatus and into the analyzers. This allowed us to make
observations over the entire curve instead of only around zero as
in the standard CFR interference check.
Result s/Qbsgrvat- ions /Conclusions
Vehicle Exhaust Comparison
The data from the vehicle exhaust comparisons indicated that
the Horiba CO2 analyzer was giving consistently lower
measurements. Because of the results of the water vapor
interference investigation, the validity of the vehicle exhaust
comparison was suspect. However, an attempt was made to correct
the vehicle exhaust data using correction factors developed from
the water vapor interference data. The correction factors were
ratios of the water vapor responses of the "abnormal" MSA analyzer
and the average water vapor responses of the "normal" MSA
analyzers. The results (correction factors applied) of the
comparison are summarized below. This data was superseded by
later exhaust comparisons.
Vehicle Exhaust Bag C02 Comparison
%Diff. = [(Horiba Corr.Conc. - MSA Corr.Cone.)/MSA Corr.Conc.] x 100
C02 Range Comparisons
Horiba R22 vs. MSA R22
Horiba R23 vs. MSA R23
Horiba R24 vs. MSA R24
N
16
18
12
Avg % Diff.
0.67
0.04
-0.18
R22 =0-1.0%
R23 = 0 - 2.5%
R24 = 0 - 5.0%
-------
Water Vapor Inte.rference Investigation
Data was generated to investigate the possibility of water
vapor interference occurring during the vehicle exhaust
measurements. Each analyzer's response to a given "dry"
calibration gas was compared to its response to the same gas
passed through a bubbler. The sample was assumed to be in a
saturated state after it had been bubbled.
An interference-free analyzer, when measuring a bubbled
calibration gas, will return a measured concentration slightly
less than the calibration gas's "named" concentration. This is
due to the addition of water to the sample stream by the bubbler.
Therefore, if an analyzer returns a measured concentration greater
than the original "named" concentration, it is likely that water
vapor interference is occurring. The magnitude of this
interference is at least as great as the difference between the
erroneously high reading and the true "named" concentration.
The results of the water vapor interference investigation are
shown graphically in Attachment E. The graphs show the difference
between the analyzer-measured concentration (bubbled) and original
cylinder "name" (units = %C02) versus cylinder concentration
(units = %C02). The following observations/conclusions were made
on the basis of these data:
1. The responses of the Horiba C02 analyzers, including the
study analyzer, were tightly grouped. Water vapor interference,
if it was occurring with the Horiba analyzers, was difficult to
discern.
2. The responses of the MSA C02 analyzers were, tightly
grouped, with the exception of the comparison study analyzer,
which returned abnormally high responses. The positive offset of
the MSA responses indicated a small amount of water vapor
interference.
3. The negative slope of the plots was due to the
concentration-lowering effect of the bubbler. The bubbler
replaced a certain, consistent percentage of each sample with
water. This percentage equated to a larger and larger absolute
C02 reduction as higher concentration gases were used.
4. The average offset between Horiba and MSA grouped
responses was consistent and was not concentration- (or range-)
dependent.
5. The MSA C02 analyzer used in the first study gave
unrepresentative responses when compared to the other MSA
responses.
10
-------
Analyzer Sensitivity to Barometric; Chances
The effect of changes in barometric pressure on analyzer
readings was studied to see if any correlation existed. A mid-
span secondary cylinder was repeatedly read on each range of each
C02 analyzer over the 21-day study period. Readings were obtained
over a barometric pressure range of 28.5 to 29.25 "Hg. The
analyzer readings from each range were regressed against barometer
readings. In this way, we planned to see if analyzer readings
changed as the barometer changed.
The Horiba C02 analyzer showed a very low correlation
coefficient between reading changes and barometric changes, and we
concluded that no correlation existed at the 95% confidence level.
A correlation may have existed at lower confidence levels, but
this was not investigated.
The MSA C02 analyzer studied did show a valid correlation, at
the 95% confidence level, between reading changes and barometric
changes. The results are shown in Attachment F.
Wet Precision
The vehicle exhaust samples were also used to estimate
analyzer precision. Duplicate measurements were made on each
vehicle exhaust bag. Standard deviations were calculated on the
duplicates. The standard deviations were then pooled together.1
The results are shown in Attachment G.
One other useful operational statistic was computed, and that
was relative range.2 This statistic was calculated only for
sample bag measurements generated on the Horiba C02 analyzer and
serves as a benchmark for future reference. The relative range
data and calculations are shown in Attachment G. The average
relative range of duplicates for Horiba C02 Ranges 22, 23, and 24
turned out to be very consistent with values between 0.21% and
0.24% (of point). This meant that we could expect the Horiba C02
analyzer used in the study to be capable of repeating measurements
of vehicle exhaust to within 0.24%.
Curve Check Summary Statistics
A mid-span calibration gas was measured twice daily to flag
possible curve shifts. No out-of-tolerance curve shifts were
observed. The mid-span data was also used to check for analyzer
sensitivity to changes in barometric pressure. The summary
statistics and raw data are listed in Attachment H.
1- Formula from EPA QAMS (3/30/84), Chapter 5, page 8.
2- Formula from EPA QAMS (3/30/84), Chapter 5, page 1.
11
-------
VI. Second C02 Comparison Study
Summary
The effort to document measurement differences between old
and new NDIR analyzers was, at this point, focused on the
comparison of C02 analyzers. A good portion of the comparison
data from the previous study could not be relied upon due to the
findings of the water vapor interference investigation. A second
comparison study was designed and underwent a panel review by
members of Facility Support Branch, Quality Control, Quality
Assurance, Certification Branch, and Correlation & Engineering
Services. The review group met several times and, as a
conseo^aence, several revisions to the design of the study were
performed. It should be noted that the input from the
interdivisional panel was an invaluable tool in clarifying what
was needed for the EPCN process.
The Calibration and Maintenance Group began taking data for
the second comparison study in August of 1988. The study again
focused on a comparison of vehicle exhaust samples. Water vapor
interference data was again taken, with several refinements added
to the procedure. A controlled C02 measurement comparison at
background level concentrations was also performed.
Procedures and precautions used for the control of the study
included representative analyzer selections, daily calibration
curve generation, and water vapor mass measurement as well as all
of the controls used in the previous study.
The second comparison study showed that the Horiba and MSA
C02 analyzers agreed very closely when measuring dry calibration
gases. The Horiba demonstrated better precision than the MSA on
dry (water vapor free) calibration gas readings.
A small bias was observed between Horiba and MSA C02 analyzer
readings taken from vehicle exhaust bags. The Horiba analyzer
gave consistently lower readings than the MSA. The mean
difference in analyzer readings was -0.53% (of the MSA corrected
concentration).
The negative shift in the C02 measurement produced a positive
shift in calculated fuel economy. The magnitude of the positive
shift was virtually equal to the magnitude of the C02 shift
(corrected concentration).
The water vapor interference data showed a similar negative
bias (Horiba read lower), but the magnitude of this single effect
would have only accounted for one-third of the bias in vehicle
exhaust measurements. The interference data also displayed
greater variability than the vehicle exhaust data.
12
-------
We concluded that water vapor interference was contributing
to the bias in vehicle exhaust C02 measurements but that there
were other factors involved. In addition, the nature of the
interference data suggests that the MSA analyzer, not the Horiba,
was exhibiting the water vapor interference. It should also be
noted that the measured interference effects did not cause the
analyzers to exceed the manufacturer's stated accuracy limits or
CFR interference criteria, and both the MSA and Horiba analyzer
groups could be termed "free" of water vapor interference.
The impact of the measurement shift documented in our
controlled comparison may not be detectable in future production
test results. The fact that a fuel economy determination may
require eight C02 measurements (four sample and four background
for full confirmatory), combined with the normal variability
experienced across the certification sites, will tend to mask a
small measurement shift.
The study data underwent another review by QC/QA as part of
the EPCN process. Most of the study data was incorporated into
the final EPCN #70 package. Only minor questions and comments on
the EPCN have been received at this time.
Discussion of Analyzer Selections for Study
The C02 measurement comparison study involved two individual
analyzers chosen to represent their respective analyzer groups.
This section presents data that show each of the study analyzers
is representative of its "population." Completely similar data on
both analyzer groups did not exist; however, we felt the data
presented here were sufficient to make the selections.
The information on the MSA analyzer group contains a SAC
summary of MVEL MSA C02 analyzers over a 7-month period leading up
to the C02 study, and the water vapor interference data for C02
Range 23 (0-2.5%) generated during a preliminary water vapor
sensitivity study (see Attachment I). The water vapor
interference data was generated by reading secondary standards
which had been flowed through a bubbler at room temperature.
The information on the Horiba C02 analyzer group contains the
water vapor interference data for C02 Range 23 (0-2.5%) generated
during the preliminary water vapor sensitivity study and the
Horiba-supplied performance test results from pre-purchase
compliance testing (see Attachment I) .
The SAC data indicated that the MSA analyzer used in the
comparison study (Site A002 C02 analyzer) was representative of
the other MSA analyzers. The mean deviations (from average) for
the three MSA analyzers, screened for the study were closely
grouped over the 7-month SAC analysis period.
13
-------
The water vapor interference data showed that the responses
of the MSA analyzer used in the comparison study.were closely
grouped with the responses of the other MSA analyzers.
The performance test data and the water vapor interference
data indicated that the responses of the Horiba analyzer used in
the comparison study were closely grouped with the responses of
the other Horiba analyzers.
Water Vapor Interference Investigation
Background
Previous studies on NDIR instruments, primarily CO
instruments, showed that analyzer readings could be affected by
the presence of water vapor in the sample. We suspected water
vapor as the cause of C02 measurement differences between Horiba
and MSA analyzers observed during the previous study.
We wanted to quantify any possible water vapor interference
effect by running a controlled experiment. Because we wished to
use this information to help quantify a possible fuel economy
measurement shift, the optimum data for such an investigation
would come from actual vehicle exhaust samples; however, using
actual exhaust samples was not practically feasible. C02 and
water vapor content are highly correlated in vehicle exhaust,
which means high C02 levels are generally observed in conjunction
with high water vapor levels. This makes the water vapor
interference statistically difficult to separate out. Also,
actual exhaust data does not contain the low-to-moderate levels of
water vapor needed to really quantify the interference effect.
C02 measurements for the water vapor interference study were
obtained by using calibration gases, and water vapor was added to
the samples by using a "variable" bubbler apparatus. This
consisted of a standard bubbler with a valve-controlled bypass
added to vary the amount of water vapor added to the samples.
This made it possible to cover much larger ranges of water vapor
and C02 content faster and more efficiently than with actual
exhaust samples. This strategy produced a controlled, isolated
measure of the water vapor influence.
Test Description
The test involved running the study calibration gases through
a variable bubbler and into the Horiba and MSA C02 analyzers
simultaneously. A dew-point meter was put in line to measure the
humidity content. A schematic of the setup is shown in Attachment
J. The analyzers were simultaneously calibrated on a daily basis.
14
-------
The study measured the analyzers' agreement on samples that
had humidities ranging from essentially 0 grains/pound to more
than 90 grains/pound. Gas concentrations were also controlled,
and ranged from zero gas up to 2.4% C02.
Data Handling
The matrix of data generated contained C02 analyzer agree-ent
at various levels of water vapor content and C02 concentration.
Multiple linear regressions were performed to see if either water -
vapor content, C02 concentration, or the cross-product of the two
could account for the variations in analyzer agreement. A raw
data table and analyzer agreement plot are shown in Attachment J.
Observations
Of all the regressions performed, a simple linear regression
of analyzer agreement versus water vapor content, with a zero
intercept, showed the best fit. Although the correlation
coefficient squared (r^) was still quite low, this regression was
used later in the study to try and account for C02 analyzer output
differences observed on vehicle exhaust bag measurements.
Vehicle Exhaust Bag CO2 Comparison
Summary
Exhaust samples were collected from vehicles using standard
driving cycles (2-Bag LA-4's, Highways). A total of 11 tests were
run (see Attachment K). Sample and background bags were read
simultaneously on both analyzers. The humidity of the bag sets
was measured for possible correlation with the water vapor
interference investigation data. The comparison results are shown
in the table below and graphically in Attachment K. A raw data
table is also shown in Attachment K.
VEHICLE EXHAUST C02 COMPARISON RESULTS
Sample and Background Bag Comparison Results
C02 Analyzer Agreement ( % of MSA Sample Pt.Diff.)
[«H - M)/M3) * 100]
Background
Sample
Min
0.0072
-0.2045
Max
-0.52
-1.27
Mean
-0.20
-0.69
95% Confidence Interval
-0.33 < (I < -0.07
-0.88 < U < -0.50
Corrected Concentration Comparison Results
C02 Analyzer Agreement ( % of Pt.Diff.)
[«HCC - MCC)/MCC) * 100]
I Corr. Cone.
Min
-0.0226
Max
-0.98
Mean
-0.5302
95% Confidence Interval
-0.73 < U < -0.33
15
-------
A small bias was observed between Horiba and MSA C02 analyzer
readings taken from vehicle exhaust bags. The Horiba analyzer
gave consistently lower readings than the MSA. The mean
difference in analyzer readings was -0.53% (of the MSA corrected
concentration).
The negative shift in the C02 measurement produced a positive
shift in calculated fuel economy. The magnitude of the positive
shift was virtually equal to the magnitude of the C02 shift
(corrected concentration).
Test Description
The study required a special setup in which a Horiba C02
analyzer was connected in parallel with the MSA analyzer located
on Site A002 (see Attachment K). The analyzers were calibrated
simultaneously each day that study data was taken to randomize the
effect of the calibration curve generation process. A special set
of gases was used for the daily calibrations; however, the initial
and final set of curves were generated with secondary standards
for curve comparison purposes.
The supplied flow rate to the Horiba analyzer was 3.0 SCFH,
6.0 SCFH to the MSA analyzer. Digital voltmeters were used to
measure the analyzers' output.
The vehicle exhaust C02 comparison was limited to standard
lab range 23 (0-2.5% C02) only. We felt this was acceptable
because of data indicating that Range 23 is used approximately 96%
of the time on FTP and Highway analyses.4
Other Data Handling
The analyzer agreement (C02 corrected concentration
differences) and C02 concentration values were regressed against
each other to see if a correlation existed. This was done to
determine if changes in analyzer agreement were concentration
dependent.
4- Actual C02 Range use data compiled by D. Garter. Analysis of 385 FTP and
366 Highway tests performed between 1/1/87 and 6/5/87 showed C02 Range 23 (0-
2.5%) used 99.5% on Bag 1, 89.3% on Bag 2, 99.5% on Bag 3 of FTP tests and
95.6% on Highway tests. ( See memo dated 5/13/88 from D. Garter to
J.T.White.)
16
-------
Observations
The data showed a negative bias (Horiba read lower) of mean
magnitude equal to -0.53% (of the MSA corrected concentration)
between the Horiba and MSA C02 analyzers. The observed bias was
statistically valid (the 95% confidence interval on the mean did
not include zero).
The humidity content of the sample bags was grouped between
60 and 75 grains/pound and the background bag humidities were
grouped between 40 and 55 grains/pound (agreeing closely with the
test cell measured humidity).
The variations in analyzer agreement could not be explained
by variations in C02 concentration. In each case the correlation
coefficient was below the minimum level needed to establish that
correlation exists at 95% confidence level (rm;j_n = 0.602).
Analyzer agreement is simply reported in means and confidence
intervals as a result. The calculated correlation coefficients
were as follows:
Regressed Variables Correlation Coeff.(r)
Corr.Conc. % F.S.Diff.s 0.11
vs. MSA Corr.Conc.(%C02)
Corr.Conc. % pt.D'iff.s 0.48
vs. MSA Corr.Conc.(%C02)
Analysis of Vehicle Exhaust Bag CO2 Measurement Differences
Analysis Description
An attempt was made to account for the differences observed
on vehicle exhaust bag C02 measurements by calculating and
removing the effect of water vapor interference. The calculations
were based on what we had observed in the interference
investigation.
The specific humidity raw data from the vehicle exhaust bag
comparison were used with a regression equation developed from the
water vapor interference investigation to calculate a
concentration difference "K" (see Attachment L). The "K" values
were then subtracted from the Horiba analyzer readings. New
dilution factors, bag differences, and corrected concentration
differences were then calculated.
17
-------
Once the analyzer differences were "corrected" in this
manner, new confidence intervals on the mean differences could be
computed to see if they included zero.
Observations
The calculated water vapor effect only accounted for
approximately one-third of the difference observed between Horiba
and MSA C02 readings on vehicle exhaust bags. The data still
showed a statistically valid negative bias (Horiba read lower) of
mean magnitude equal to -0.36% (of the MSA corrected
concentration). This remaining difference could not be explained.
Description of Calibration Gases Used in the Study
At the Gas Lab's request, a separate set of calibration
gases, as opposed to the Gas Lab's secondary standards, were used
for the daily curve generation. Secondary standards were not
depleted, and overlap of cylinder usage between the Gas Lab and
the study was thus avoided. Cylinders for the study were procured
by the Gas Lab and named off curves generated from secondary
standards, making them equivalent to working gases,i.e., span
gases.
Printouts documenting the daily calibration curve generation
are listed in Attachment M. The printouts contain some notation
in the operator comment section that needs clarifying:
BLINE = Initial curves generated with sec. standards
WORK = Curves generated with "working" standards
ENDSEC = Final curves generated with sec. standards
ENDWORK = Final curves generated with "working" standards
Calibration Curve Variability
Test Description
Daily calibration curves were generated simultaneously on
both the study analyzers to measure response shifts and the
resulting curve shifts (see Attachment M). The same curve fit
parameters were used on both analyzers' curves. This process
measured the individual variabilities of the two C02 measurement
systems as well as the variability of their agreement to each
other. Response shifts and resulting curve shifts due to
barometric pressure changes were, in effect, compensated for by
the daily curve generation and therefore were not considered a
factor during this study. A total of 10 curves were generated on
18
-------
Range 23 (0-2.5%) of each analyzer. In addition, Range 22 (0-
1.0%) on both analyzers was calibrated during two of the test days
as part of the background level C02 measurement comparison. The
calibrations were generated with a special set of gases obtained
for the study.
Data Handling
For each test day, the curve-generated C02 concentrations for
each calibration gas were compared back to the calibration gas
"named" concentration. The results are shown in the following
table and graphically in Attachment N. In addition, since the
curve generation was performed simultaneously on both analyzers,
the curve-generated concentrations for each cylinder were paired
and differences calculated. The results are shown in the
following table and graphically in Attachment N.
Calibration Curve Statistics
No. of Curves = 10
Cal. Cyl.
Conc(%C02)
2.3803
1.9123
1.6013
1.2088
0.9515
0.7991
0.4959
0.4060
Horiba Avg
Conc(%C02)
2.3800
1.9125
1.6013
1.2100
0.9504
0.7984
0.4962
0.4063
HOR - Cyl.
AV
-------
The overall variability (±3 Standard Deviations) of the
difference between the two analyzers calibration curves was within
±0.26% of Full Scale at each calibrated point.
We concluded that analyzer agreement during the calibration
process was excellent, and we could assume that the analyzers gave
equivalent calibration results.
These data also demonstrated that the Horiba C02 analyzer is
quite capable of meeting CFR requirements and is much more precise
than the MSA unit.
Background Level CQ2 Measurement Comparison
Background
The first C02 comparison study showed greater disagreement
(on a percentage basis) of background bag measurements than on
sample bag measurements taken between Horiba and MSA analyzers.
It was not known if the disagreement was a characteristic of the
background bag measurements or if it was a calibration curve
disagreement. For this reason, an agreement check of the
analyzers on background level, dry C02 gases was included in this
study.
Test Description
The test involved measuring the analyzers' responses to low
level C02 cylinder gases. Three cylinders were obtained from the
Gas Lab for the study. On the first and last testing days of the
study, two curves were generated on Range 22 (0-1.0%) and Range 23
(0-2.5%) of both analyzers, one using secondary standards, the
second using the study calibration gases. Responses to the low
level C02 gases were taken and concentrations calculated from the
various curves. In addition, responses to cylinders were taken
daily on Range 23 (0-2.5%) and concentrations calculated from the
daily curves. Since the responses were taken simultaneously on
both analyzers, the readings were paired and differences were
calculated. The results are shown Attachment 0.
Observations
The differences in measured concentrations between the
analyzers had an average of -0.011% of Full Scale (Range 23 or
2.5% C02 FS).
The large percent differences on background bag measurements
that were observed in the previous study were not observed in the
background agreement data or the background bag comparison data of
this study.
20
-------
VII. EPCN Process Coordination/Implementation
Equipment replacements within the EOD production testing
environment are subject to the Equipment/Procedure Change Noti-2,
or EPCN, process. The work documented in this report, for the
most part, was performed to address the objectives of that
process.
Initially, the first investigations and comparisons were
performed and the results, along with Horiba supplied performance
data and other details of the procurement, were incorporated into
an EPCN draft package. The package was released for comments in
April of 1988. The comments received indicated that further
comparison tests would have to be performed and, in addition, some
consensus would have to be reached among the "customers" as to
exactly what data would satisfy everyone.
In order to address this issue, an interdivisional panel was
formed. The panel was made up of members of Facility Support
Branch (FSB), Quality Control (QC), Quality Assurance (QA),
Correlation & Engineering Services (C&ES), and Certification
Branch. The panel's review of the test plan proposed by LPG
helped optimize the plan's specific details. The second set of
comparison tests were performed and the results underwent a
follow-up review by the panel. No further testing was requested,
and a second EPCN package was drafted and released for comments in
October of 1988. Once the comments had been received, the EPCN
package underwent a final review/revision process by members of
FSB, QA and QC. The finalized version of EPCN #70 was signed off
and released in February of 1989.
VIII. Installation Chronology
Gas Lab
The Gas Lab began using Horiba high CO and C02 analyzers as
of 7-16-87. The low CO analyzer will be replaced with a Horiba
unit at a later date .
Light Duty
Site A001 was released for production testing on 1-19-89.
Site A002 was released for production testing on 4-11-89.
Site A003 was released for production testing on 6-15-89.
Site A004 is slated for NDIR replacement in June of 1990.
Sites A202 and A203 had Horiba analyzers installed in early
1988.
21
-------
Heavy Duty
Site A009 had a new Horiba low CO analyzer installed in early
1988.
Other Changes
Several incidental and/or related changes were made to the
analyzer benches as part of the NDIR replacement. These changes
were included within the measurement comparisons, i.e., Horiba
analyzers were operated under changed conditions, and therefore
their combined impact on testing was observed and documented. The
following sections discuss the changes.
Flow Rate
The normal flow rate to the CO and C02 NDIR analyzers was
changed from 6.0 SCFH to 3.0 SCFH. The change was made to relieve
demand on the sample bench pump. This will allow easier flow
balancing of the bench, allow the flow rate to another analyzer to
be increased if needed, and lengthen the the life of the pump.
Bench Plumbing
Although no changes were made to the fundamental schematic of
the sample bench, the actual placement of the plumbing was
modified in a "housekeeping" effort. Valves and sample lines were
moved to help standardize the layouts of the light duty benches.
An updated schematic of the light duty benches is contained in
Calibration and Maintenance Group files.
Sample Analysis Correlation (SAC) Revision
The CO range changes required a corresponding change in the
CO concentrations generated for SAC. The lowest CO range is now
R16 (0 - 100 ppm); this means that a larger range of CO
concentrations must be generated by the SAC blender. Several
changes were made to the SAC schedule in order to accomplish this,
as follows:
1. The CO cylinder concentration was lowered from 1700 ppm
to 800 ppm to obtain the low blended CO concentrations needed for
Range 16 while maintaining the minimum blend time of 15 seconds.
2. The SAC schedule sequence for HC and NOX was rearranged
to obtain blend time needed to generate CO concentrations for
Range 20 (0-2500 ppm).
22
-------
3. The previous SAC schedule checked CO Ranges 11, 19, and
20, a total of five, two, and one time(s), respectively. The new
SAC schedule will check CO Ranges 16, 18, and 20, a total of four,
three, and one time(s), respectively, during the 2-week SAC
period. This is in response to a request by QC for more
appropriate coverage of the CO ranges.
IX. Overall Discussion of Study Results
cn
The CO measurement comparisons performed on vehicle exhaust
during the preliminary investigations documented mean differences
that ranged from approximately -1.0% to -4.0% of point. However,
the CO comparison data set needs some further qualifying.
Two of the three range comparisons were interrange, meaning
that the comparisons were between different ranges. This
reflected the proposed CO range changes.
The largest mean difference was observed in the high CO
(Range 20) comparison. The MSA high CO analyzer was found to
exhibit an unacceptable amount of water vapor interference during
a follow-up test. This meant that the instrument was giving
abnormally high responses to humid samples. Since in the high CO
comparison, the MSA was reading higher than the Horiba, we
concluded that we could expect somewhat better analyzer agreement
between the two high CO analyzer populations.
For these reasons, it was decided that further CO comparisons
were not warranted and the Horiba NDIR CO analyzers were approved
for use at MVEL based on the preliminary investigation and the
pre-purchase performance test results.
During the course of the project, the focus of the C02
investigation was narrowed to a comparison of C02 measurements
taken on Range 23 (0-2.5%) only.
The comparison study showed that the Horiba and MSA C02
analyzers agreed very closely when measuring dry calibration
gases. The Horiba demonstrated better precision than the MSA on
dry (water vapor free) calibration gas readings.
Good agreement was observed between the Horiba and MSA C02
analyzers when measuring background level C02 concentrations
generated from cylinders.
23
-------
A small bias was observed between the Horiba and MSA C02
analyzer readings taken from vehicle exhaust bags. The Horiba
analyzer gave consistently lower readings than the MSA. The mean
difference in analyzer readings was -0.53% (of the MSA corrected
concentration), with the Horiba giving lower results.
The negative shift in the C02 measurement produced a positive
shift in calculated fuel economy. The magnitude of the positive
shift was virtually equal to the magnitude of the C02 shift
(corrected concentration).
The water vapor interference data showed a similar negative
bias (Horiba read lower), but the magnitude of this single effect
would have only accounted for one-third of the bias in vehicle
exhaust measurements. The interference data also displayed
greater variability than the vehicle exhaust data.
We concluded that water vapor interference was contributing
to the bias in vehicle exhaust C02 measurements, but that other
factors were involved. In addition, the nature of the
interference data suggested that the MSA analyzer, not the Horiba,
was exhibiting the water vapor interference. It should also be
noted that the measured interference effects were within the
manufacturer's stated accuracy limits, and both the MSA and Horiba
analyzer groups could be termed "free" of water vapor
interference.
The impact of the measurement shift documented in our
controlled comparison may not be detectable in future production
test results. The fact that a fuel economy determination may
require eight C02 measurements (four sample and four background
for full confirmatory), combined with the normal variability
experienced across the certification sites, will tend to mask a
small measurement shift.
24
-------
XI . List of Attachments
A EPCN 170 Cover Page
B Analyzer Location Table
C Procurement Documentation
D Pre-purchase Test Result slots
F Barometer Sensitivity Table
G Wet Precision Tables
H Curve Check Summary Statistics/Raw Data
I Analyzer Selections for Study
J Water Vapor Interference Plots/Data
K C02 Comparison Plots/Data
L C02 Comparison Analysis Plots/Data
M Comparison Study Calibration Curves
N Calibration Curve Statistics Plots
0 Background Level C02 Comparison Data
25
-------
ATTACHMENT A
EQUIPME^T/^Oj^pURE CHANGE NOTICE
1. ORIGINATOR J/l&jfjl|
MA
} MY
4. DIVISION CLEARANCE r
2. PHONE EXT.
215
5. TYPE OF -
CHANGE: g
EPCN TO.
70
3. REVIEW
DUE DATE:
I FED. REGISTER P
E EQUIPMENT C
'1
DATE ENTERED
3 / 24/ 87
PAGE OF
ENTER "FYr
none AS APPLICABLE
] A/C D FORM D OTilES
' HSAPC PROCEDURE
6. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS (List Attachments, Forms, Procedures, FRls, etc.)
. DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE (Attach details, specifications, drawings, and implementation plan).
All Bendix 8501-5C CO analyzers and MSA 202 CO and C02 analyzers are to be replaced with
Horiba AIA-23 CO and C02 analyzers. (AIA - 23AS for LCO).
The ranges normally used on the low CO analyzers will be changed from R17 (0-250ppm) and
R19 (0-1000ppm) to R16 (0-100ppm) and R18 (0-500ppm), respectively.
The CO blend concentrations used in the sample analysis cross check will be revised to
accommodate the range changes.
The normally supplied flow rate to the CO and C02 analyzers will be changed from 6.0 SCFH
to 3.0 SCFH.
Installation will begin mid-December 1988 and EOD Sites 1-4 will be complete by mid-March
1989, one site at a time.
8. PURF'OSE OF CHANGE (Why is this change being proposed?)
The Bendix and MSA analyzers are obsolete and some replacements parts are no longer
available. The new analyzers will provide improvements in performance and maintenance
as w
-------
ANALYZER LOCATIONS
ANALYZER:
MODEL
P/N*
CELL LENGTH /
DETECTOR TYPE
(choppers are all 10 Hz)
RANGES:
<"
-T
AIA - 23AS
363053
500mm / DUAL
AIA -23
360448
30mm / SINGLE
AIA - 23
360421
3mm / SINGLE
AIA - 23
360439
30mm / SINGLE
AIA - 23
360442
6mm / SINGLE
AIA-23
360449
1 mm/SINGLE
03
LOW
HIGH
CO2
1
2
5
10
1
1
2
5
5
10
15
100
250
500
2500
5000
0000
5000
0000
0000
2500
5000
0000
0000
5000
0000
0000
0000
0000
RANGE
1 6
1 7
1 8
20
2 1
22
2 3
2 4
20
2 1
2 2
2 2
23
24
24
TOTAL
TOTAL
9
8
1
1
1 0
1
30
A001
1
1
1
3
A002
1
1
1
3
A003
1
1
1
3
A004
1
1
1
3
A202
1
1
1
3
A203
1
1
1
3
A009
1
1
1
A251
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
SPARE
1
1
3
5
H
>
n
'Each P/N Includes one
"AIA" (detector) and one
-OPE" (amplifier).
-------
(Shaded areas are for use of procurement office only)
ATTACHMENT C
Page
of
US Environmental Protection Agency
Washington. DC 20460
P&fccuremen
R/Juest/Or
1. Name of Originator
Aaron D. McCarthy
3. Mail Code
^ BOD-15
4. Telephone Number
313-668-4215
2. Date of Requisition
06-16-86
5. Date hem Required
6. Signaiure of Originator
7. Recommended Procurement Method
iC£Compeinive LJ Otner than full and open competition LJ Sole source small purchase
8. Deliver To (Project Manager)
Carl J. Ryan
9. Address z565 Plymouth Rd
EPA Ann Arbor, Mich. 48105
10. Mail Code
EOD-15
11. Telephone Number
313-668-4251
12. Financial Data
(a) Appropriation
NOTE: Item 12 (c) Document TypeContract = "C," Purchase
Order = "P," IGA = "A," Other (Misc.) - "X" '
.. FMOUse ..
(blf>3 digits)
Document
Control Number
(d) 16 digits)
Account Number
(eH10 digits)
Object
Class
(f) /4 digits)
Amount (g)
Dollars
Cents;
12. SuSsCSiec1 Source (Name. Address. ZIP Code. Phone/Contact)
See Attachment A
14. Amount of money
committed is:
H Original
D Increase
D Decrease
15. Contracting office is authorized toexceed amount shown by 10%
D v« D NO
16. Servicing Finance Office Number
17. Approvals
d. Property Management OHicer/Designee
Date
(
Date
listed abov£ are availabl?a4fl
reserved /
f. OtheVfSpeev/y;
Date
18. Date of Oroer
19. Order Number-.
20. Contract Number (it any)
21. Discount Terms
22. FOB Point
23. Delivery to FOB Point by On or before (Date)
24. Person Taking Order/Quote and Phone No.
5. Convrartcr -'/Va/ne. aadress. ZIP Code)
26. Type of Order
S a. Purchase
Reference your quote (See block 24)
Please furnish the above on the terms specified on both sides of this order and or
the attached sheets, if any. inc4uding delivery as indicated. - ;:
b. Delivery provisions on the reverse are deleted. The delivery order is
subject to the terms and conditions of the contract. (See Bloc* 20) . .
Oral.
LJwrrnen LJ Confirming",.'.'-'..'".'-": ".- .--.j\-".T;:2 ' ;' :
27. Schedule
hem !
NumOer I
(a) i
Supplies or Services
Ib)
Quantity
Ordered
Unit
Id)
Estimated
Unit Price
(e)
Unit
Price
- If)
Amount'
(g)
' Quantity
Accept ec
(h) '
00 Analyzer
(Horlba tbdel A1A-23 or equivalent)
COn Analyzer
(Horiba tfodel A1A-23 or equivalent)
Required Analyzer Ranges,
Specifications and Features
See Attachments B & C
JUSTIFICATION; Needed to replace
obsolete equipment.
19
11
-' " .V«V
.'"*i:-'..
$120,000.00
Total
23. United States of America
By (Signature)
29. Typed Name and Title of Contracting .Officer;
-------
C -1
SUGGESTED SOURCES
Beckman Industrial Corporation
41365 Vincenti Court
Novi, MI 48050
Horiba Instruments
3901 Varsity Drive
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
Vfestinghouse Electric Corporation
Maihak AG Subsidiary
12:01 N. Main
P.O. Box 901
Orville, OH 44667-0901
Combustion Engineering Inc.
Process Analytical Division
P.O. Drawer 831
Leiwisburg, W. Virginia 24901
-------
C-2
SPECIFICATIONS
Horiba Model AIA-23 or equivalent. The following salient features of the
Horiba Model AIA-23 will be used to determine equivalency:
TYPE: Non-Dispersive Infrared Analyzer, with optical
filter, and at least three switch-selectable
analysis ranges.
RANGES: Required ranges listed in Attachment C.
OUTPUT: 0 to +10 volts DC output.
RANGE IDENTIFICATION: Isolated contact closure; contact rating; 100 ma.
GAS CONNECTIONS: 1/4 NPT
SiCZE: Amplifier/control module 19" rackmount or
smaller, separate zero, span and range controls
must be provided if amplifier/control module is
larger than 3.6" wide by 9.2" tall.
POWER 115 VAC, 60 Hz
CALIBRATION & INTERFERENCE:* As per CFR 40, Ch. 1, Pts. 86.114-79, 86.122-78 &
86.124-78.
REPEATABILITY:* 12 repeated, readings shall not deviate more than
0.5$ FS (Full Scale) from each other.
NOISE:* Short term variations in analyzer output shall
not deviate more than 0.5$ FS on a 90$ FS
continuous sample over a 1-minute period.
NON-LINEARITY:* Shall be less than 10$.
DRIFT:* Long term directional variations in analyzer
output shall not deviate more than 1.0$ FS on
continuous zero and span samples over a 4-hour
period.
RESPONSE TIME:* Response time to 90$ final reading shall be less
than 4.0 seconds.
* The manufacturer is required to show proof that each analyzer meets these
specifications. The manufacturer shall complete the performance tests
described by Attachment C. The manufacturer shall submit acceptable
performance test results for each analyzer within 120 days after receipt
of order. The manufacturer will be authorized to ship the analyzers only
after "the Facility Support Branch has approved the performance test
results in writing. The EPA may choose to observe performance testing at
the manufacturer's facility. The manufacturer shall give the EPA ten days
notice prior to the start of the performance testing.
1336c
-------
C-3
RANGE SPECIFICATIONS*
CO Analyzer Ranges
100 PPM (.01%)
250 PPM (.02535)
1000 PPM (.1058)
2500 PPM (.25%)
5000 PPM (.505?)
10000 PPM (1.0%)
25000 PPM (2.5%)
50000 PPM (5.0%)
100000 PPM (10.0J8)
COpAnalyzer Ranges
2500 PPM (.25%)
5000 PPM (.5058)
10000 PPM (1.0%)
10000 PPM (1.058)
25000 PPM (2.550
50000 PPM (5.058)
50000 PPM (5.0J8)
100000 PPM (10.05?)
150000 PPM (15.050
* 3 Switch Selectable Ranges Per Analyzer
0106e
Quantity (Analyzers)
9
8
10
-------
C-4
PERFORMANCE TESTS
A. Proof of Acceptability:
Prior to specific performance testing the manufacturer must show proof
that the analyzers have general acceptance in the market place. The
manufacturer shall provide three or more references, (with at least one
related to the automobile industry) of companies currently using these
specific analyzers.
B. After the contract is awarded, the manufacturer must submit documentation
to demonstrate their analyzers' performance. The manufacturer will not be
paid or authorized to ship the analyzers until the documentation is approved
by the Facility Support Branch.
The documentation which the manufacturer is required to submit is strip
chart recordings of analyzer output as well as tabulated data obtained from
the strip chart recordings. mhe documentation must show that each analyzer
has been calibrated and tested fas defined below), and that each analyzer's
performance is in accordance with the criteria defined below. The tabulated
data must list the relevant readings from the strip chart recordings that show
compliance with the performance tests. The analyzers will not be accepted if
the documentation does not show that the analyzers meet these acceptance
criteria.
The manufacturer shall submit acceptable performance test results for each
analyzer within 120 days after receipt of order. The manufacturer will be
authorized to ship the analyzers only after the Facility Support Branch has
approved the test results. The manufacturer will not be paid for equipment,
supplies or materials shipped prior to approval. The EPA may choose to
observe performance testing at the manufacturer's facility. The manufacturer
shall give the EPA 10 days notice prior to the start of the performance
testing.
Each range of each analyzer shall be calibrated as defined in the Code of
Federal P.egulations, Title 40, Chapter I, Parts 86.114-79, 86.122-78 and
86.124-78, as appropriate (see page 4). Each range of each analyzer shall be
tested as defined below.
For each calibration or test the analyzer output shall be adjusted to
produce 10.0 volts if a full-scale concentration gas were sampled and 0.0
volts if nitrogen gas were sampled. The full-scale gas concentrations for
each range are defined above under "PANGES". The strip chart recorder shall
be adjusted to record its full-scale output for a 10.0 volt input, and zero
for a 0.0 volt input. The speed of the strip chart recorder paper shall be
written on the paper. Use of linearizing circuitry in the analyzer is not
allowed. The analyzer sample gas flow rate for these tests shall be 4.0
standard cubic feet per hour (standard conditions of 70.0 degrees Farenheit
and 14.696 psia).
1. INTERFERENCE: Each carbon monoxide analyzer shall meet interference
criteria as defined in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Chapter
I, Part 86.122-78 (see page 4). The use of conditioning columns is not
allowed.
-------
C-5
2. Repeatability: The following sequence shall be repeated 12 times; sample
nitrogen ga» until analyzer output is stable, sample a nominal 905? of
full-scale' sample gas until analyzer output is stable, record analyzer
output. Each reading shall not deviate more than 0.55? of full-scale
output, from the average of the 12 readings.
3,. Noise: A nominal 905? of full-scale sample gas shall be sampled
continuously for one minute. The analyzer output shall not deviate more
than 0.55? of full-scale analyzer output, from minimum to maximum.
4,, Non-Linearity: The percent non-linearity of the calibration curve is
defined as the deviation at mid-scale of the curve concentration from the
straight line connecting zero and full-scale concentration. The deviation
is expressed as a percentage of full-scale concentration and shall be
determined as follows: find the curve concentration at half of the
full-scale analyzer output using the calibration curve found above,
subtract this from half of the full-scale concentration, divide the result
by the full-scale concentration, multiply this result by 100, The percent
non-linearity shall be less than 10%. The use of linearizing circuitry is
not allowed. NOTE: This test is not required if the calibration curve is
a single calibration factor, as defined in the CPU references listed above.
5, Drift: This test shall be performed on the lowest range of each analyzer
only. Zero: Nitrogen gas shall be sampled continuously for 4-hours. The
analyzer output shall not deviate more than 1,0? of full-scale analyzer
output, from minimum to maximum. Span: A nominal 905? of full-scale
sample gas shall be sampled continuously for 4-hours. The analyzer output
shall not deviate more than 1.05? of full-scale analyzer output, from
minimum to maximum.
6. Response Time: A strip chart recording of transitory analyzer output,
which occurs when the analyzer samples a step change in gas concentration,
shall be obtained as follows: sample nitrogen gas until the analyzer
output is stable, sample a nominal 905? of full-scale sample gas until the
analyzer output is stable. The time duration from the start of analyzer
output transition, to 905? of the final stable analyzer output, shall be
less than 4.0 seconds.
#0106e
-------
C-6
Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40
I M.114-7f Analytical
(a) Analyzer i
(1) Gases for the CO and CO. ana-
lyzeis shall be single blends of CO and
COt respectively mint nitrogen as the
diluent.
(2) Oases for the hydrocarbon ana-
lyzer shall be single blends of propane
usinir Air *tne diluent.
(3) Oases for NO. analyzer shall be
single blends of NO named as NO,.
with a maximum NO* concentration of
3 percent of the nominal value, using
nitrogen as the diluent.
(4) Fuel for the evaporative emission
enclosure FID shall be a blend of
40±ll% hydrogen with the balance
belni helium. The mixture shall con-
tain less than 1 ppm equivalent carbon
response. 98 to 100 percent hydrogen
fuel may be used with advance approv-
al by the Administrator.
(5]> The allowable zero gas (air or ni-
trogen) impurity concentrations shall
not exceed 1 ppm equivalent carbon
response. 1 ppm carbon monoxide. 0.04
percent (400 ppm) carbon dioxide and
0.1 ppm nitric oxide.
(0!) "Zero grade air" Includes artifi-
cial "air" consisting of a blend of ni-
trogen and oxygen with oxygen con-
centrations between 18 and 21 mole
percent.
(7) The use of proportioning and
-culon blending devices to obtain
.>;: required analyzer gas concentra-
tion Is allowable provided their use
has been approved in advance by the
Administrator.
(b) Calibration gases shall be trace-
able to within 1 percent of NBS gas
standards, or other gas standards
which have been approved by the Ad-
minilstrator.
(c) Span gases shall be accurate to
within 2 percent of true concentration.
where true concentration refers to
NBS gas standards, or other gas stand-
ards: which have been approved by the
Administrator.
[42 1TO 32954. June 28. 1977. u amended at
43 FR S2920. Nov. 14.19781
184.122-71 Carbon , monoxide analyst*
calibration/ ', '
The NDIR carbon monoxide analys-
er shall receive the following 'initial
and periodic calibrations:
(a) Initial and periodic interference
cheek. Prior, to 1U Introduction into.
service and annually thereaftef. the.
NDIR carbon monoxide analyzer shall
be checked for. response to watee vapor*
and CO*:. . .. .
(1) Follow the manufacturer's in*
sanctions for instrument startup, and-
operation. Adjust the analyzer to opti-
mize performance on the; most-senst*
live range to be used.
(2) Zero the carbon monoxide ana-
lyzer with either zero-grade air or
zero-grade nitrogen.
(3) Bubble a mixture of 3 percent
COt In Nt through water at room tern*
perature and record analyzer response.
(4) Aa analyzer response of more
than 1 percent of full scale for ranges
above 300 ppm full scale or of more
than 3 ppm on ranges below 300 ppm
full scale will require corrective action.
(Use of conditioning columns is one
form of corrective action which may
betaken.)
(b) Initial and periodic calibration.
Prior to Its introduction into service
and monthly thereafter the NDIR
carbon monoxide analyzer shall be
calibrated.
(1) Adjust the analyzer to optimize
performance.
(2) Zero the carbon monoxide ana-
lyzer with either zero-grade air or
zero-grade nitrogen.
(3) Calibrate on each normally used
operating range with carbon monoxide
In Ni calibration gases having nominal
concentrations of IS. 30. 45. 60.75. and
90 percent of that range. Additional
calibration points may be generated.
For each range calibrated. If the devi-
ation from a least-squares best-fit
straight line Is 2 percent or less of the
value at each data point, concentra-
tion values may be calculated by use
of a single calibration factor for that
range. If the deviation exceeds 2 per-
cent at any point, the best-fit non-
linear equation, which represents the
data to within 2 percent of each test
point shall be used to determine con*
centration.
IS6.124-7S Carbon.dioxide analyser c
bration.
Prior to its introduction into sen
and. monthly thereafter the- NE
carbon dioxide analyzer, shall be c
brated:
(a) Follow the manufacturer's
structlons for instrument startup »
operation. Adjust the analyzer to o
mice performance.
Zeto the carbon dioxide analj
with, either zero-grade air or &
grade nitrogen.
(c) Calibrate on each normally t
operating range with carbon dloxld
Ni calibration gases with nominal <
centrations of IS. 30,45,60,75. an
percent of that range. Additional
bration points may be generated.
each range calibrated. U the deris
from a least-squares best-fit stra
. Unt is 2 percent or less of the raft
each data point, concentration vs
may be calculated by use of a si
calibration factor for that rangt
the deviation-exceeds 2 percent at
point; the best-fit non-linear equs
which represents the data to Witt
percent-of each- test point shsl
used to determine concentration.
-------
Serial No.
561661011
561661012
561661013
561661014
561661015
561661016
561661017
561661018
561661019
561661021
561661022
561661023
Type
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
Range
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
Range Conc.s H2O Interference Repeatability Noise Non-Linearity
Avg.
0 - 100 ppm 1.00 90.01
0 - 250 ppm - 94.01
0 - 500 ppm - 89.20
0 - 100 ppm -0.10 89.91
0 - 250 ppm - 94.04
0 - 500 ppm - 89.90
0 - 100 ppm 1.00 91.00
0 - 250 ppm - 94.17
0 - 500 ppm - 91.00
0 - 100 ppm 0.70 95.00
0 - 250 ppm - 94.01
0 - 500 ppm - 94.91
0 - 100 ppm 1.2(<3ppm) 96.02
0 - 250 ppm - 94.10
0 - 500 ppm - 96.00
0 - 100 ppm -0.10 97.02
0 - 250 ppm - 94.05
0 - 500 ppm - 97.05
0 - 100 ppm 1.10 94.84
0 - 250 ppm - 94.77
0 - 500 ppm - 95.00
0 - 100 ppm 0.50 95.97
0 - 250 ppm - 96.06
0 - 500 ppm - 96.00
0 - 100 ppm 1.40 97.01
0 - 250 ppm - 96.99
0 - 500 ppm - 97.08
0 - 2500 ppm 0.90 95.05
0 - 5000 ppm - 92.00
0 - 10000 ppm - 94.10
0 - 2500 ppm 0.80 96.03
0 - 5000 ppm - 92.91
0 - 10000 ppm - 94.90
0 - 2500 ppm 0.70 97.06
0 - 5000 ppm - 94.00
0 - 10000 ppm - 95.80
Max. Dev.
(%F.S.) I (%F.S.) | | (%) |
0.09 0.20 0.80
0.09 0.20 3.00
0.00 0.20 6.63
-0.21 0.40 0.61
0.16 0.20 2.80
-0.20 0.20 6.58
0.00 0.40 0.60
0.13 0.20 2.80
0.00 0.50 6.69
0.10 0.20
0.19 0.20 3.00
-0.09 0.20 6.96
0.08 0.40
0.10 0.20
0.00 0.10 6.48
-0.12 0.20
0.15 0.20 3.00
0.05 0.00 6.78
-0.14 0.50
-0.07 0.20
0.00 0.10 7.06
-0.17 0.70
-0.06 0.10
0.00 0.10 6.79
-0.11 0.50
-0.09 0.20
0.12 0.20 7.10
0.15 0.20
0.00 0.30
0.00 0.10 7.80
0.07 0.20
0.09 0.10
0.00 0.20 7.80
0.14 0.40
0.00 0.30
0.00 0.10 7.80
Response Time
I (sec.s) | | Min.
5.40 -0.30
5.40
5.30
5.35 -0.50
5.50
5.30
5.35 0.40
5.35
5.40
5.30 0.20
-
-
5.20 0.30
-
-
5.00 0.20
-
-
5.20 0.00
-
-
5.10 0.70
-
-
5.20 0.70
-
-
3.90 0.00
-
-
3.80 0.00
-
-
4.00 0.20
-
-
Drift (%FJS.)
Zero Span
Max. Dev. I I Min. Max.
-0.30 0.00 84.00 84.00
.
-
-0.50 0.00 84.56 84.50
-
-
-0.40 0.80 87.70 87.20
.
-
0.00 0.20
.
-
0.30 0.00
-
- -
0.10 0.10
.
-
0.00 0.00
.
-
0.50 0.20
.
-
0.70 0.00
.
-
0.00 0.00
.
-
0.00 0.00
-
-
0.10 0.10
-
-
Dev. |
0.00
-
-
0.00
-
-
0.50
-
-
0.40
-
-
0.30
-
-
0.30
-
-
0.10
-
-
0.00
-
-
0.10
-
-
0.10
-
-
0.20
-
-
0.10
-
-
w
-------
Serial No.
561661024
561661025
561661026
561661027
561661028
5616610502
5616610503
5616610504
5616610505
5616610506
5616610507
5616610508
5616610509
Type
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
C02
CO2
CO2
C02
C02
CO2
C02
CO2
Range
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
Range Conc.s H2O Interference Repeatability Noise Non-Linearity
|
0 - 2500 ppm
0 - 5000 ppm
0 - 10000 ppm
0 - 2500 ppm
0 - 5000 ppm
0 - 10000 ppm
0 - 2500 ppm
0 - 5000 ppm
0 - 10000 ppm
0 - 2500 ppm
0 - 5000 ppm
0 - 10000 ppm
0 - 2500 ppm
0 - 5000 ppm
0 - 10000 ppm
0 - 1 .0 %
0 - 2.5%
0 - 5.0%
0 - 1 .0 %
0 - 2.5%
0 - 5.0%
0 - 1.0 %
0 - 2.5%
0 - 5.0%
0 - 1.0 %
0 - 2.5%
0 - 5.0%
0- 1.0 %
0 - 2.5%
0 - 5.0%
0- 1.0%
0 - 2.5%
0 - 5.0%
0-1.0%
0 - 2.5%
0 - 5.0%
0 - 1 .0 %
0 - 2.5%
0 - 5.0%
I I AV9'
(%F.S.) I I (%F.S.)
0.80 95.07
92.78
94.00
0.80 96.00
93.70
95.00
0.70 97.02
94.90
96.00
0.80 93.28
92.60
93.60
0.60 94.36
93.60
94.60
92.83
-
93.08
94.90
-
95.08
93.08
-
94.00
94.11
-
95.00
95.08
-
96.00
94.00
-
94.00
92.94
.
95.00
95.95
-
96.00
Max. Dev.
I (%F.S.) | | (%F.S.) | I (%)
-0.07 0.30
0.08 0.30
0.00 0.10 8.14
0.00 0.10
0.00 0.10
0.00 0.00 8.14
0.08 0.20
0.00 0.10
0.00 0.10 7.77
-0.08 0.20
0.00 0.10
0.00 0.10 8.38
-0.06 0.40
0.00 0.30
0.00 0.20 9.63
-0.07 0.40
.
-0.08 0.10 7.73
0.10 0.20
.
-0.08 0.10 7.91
-0.08 0.30
.
0.00 0.10 7.82
-0.11 0.20
.
0.00 0.10 7.82
-0.08 0.20
.
0.00 0.10 7.82
0.00 0.30
.
0.00 0.10 7.88
0.06 0.20
.
0.00 0.10 7.88
-0.05 0.20
.
0.00 0.00 7.88
Response Time Drift (%FJS.)
Zero
I (sec.s) | | Min. Max. Dev. I
3.80 0.00 0.20 0.20
.
-
3.60 -0.10 -0.30 0.20
.
-
3.60 0.00 -0.10 0.10
.
-
3.60 -0.40 -0.60 0.20
.
-
3.60 0.30 0.10 0.20
.
-
3.30 0.30 0.40 0.10
.
-
3.30 -0.50 -0.90 0.40
.
-
3.40 0.00 -0.10 0.10
.
-
3.40 0.70 -0.10 0.80
-
-
3.50 -0.10 -0.50 0.40
-
-
3.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
.
-
3.50 0.20 0.10 0.10
.
-
3.60 0.60 0.40 0.20
.
.
Span
Min. Max. Dev. I
0.10
.
-
0.00
.
-
0.20
.
-
0.00
.
-
0.10
-
-
0.50
.
-
0.10
-
-
0.30
.
.
0.60
.
-
0.10
-
-
0.00
.
-
0.70
.
-
0.60
.
.
-------
Serial No. Type Range Range Conc-s H2O Interference
Repeatability
Noise Non-Linearity Response Time
Drift (%F.S.)
(%F.S.)
Avg.
(%F.S.)
Max. Dev.
5616610510 C02
5616610501 C02
56166103 C02
56166104 C02
56166106 C02
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
0-1.0%
0 - 2.5%
0 - 5.0%
0 - 1.0 %
0 - 2.5%
0 - 5.0%
0 - 5.0%
0 - 10.0%
0 - 15.0%
0 - 2500 ppm
0 - 5000 ppm
0 - 10000 ppm
0 - 2500 ppm
0 - 5000 ppm
0 - 10000 ppm
93.86
93.00
92.90
93.00
95.00
90.96
92.00
90.00
91.00
94.00
90.50
90.90
91.90
-0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
I (%F.S.) |
0.20
0.00
0.30
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.40
0.10
0.10
Zero Span
I I (sec.s) I | Min. Max. Dev. I | Min. Max. Dev.
7.88
8.37
6.43
8.89
7.79
3.60
3.20
3.20
3.20
3.70
3.60
3.60
3.40
3.20
3.20
0.10 0.00 0.10
3.60 0.00 -0.30 0.30
0.20 -0.30 0.50
-0.10 -0.50 0.40
0.00 0.00 0.00
0.20
0.20
0.00
0.30
0.60
G
-------
Range 22 Water Response (CO2 Analyzers)
0.015
CM
O
Q>
0.010
0.005
0.000 <
-0.005
-0.010
-0.015
-a- A001 ( MSA)
*- A002JMSA)
*- A003(MSA)
-*- A004(MSA)
* Comp. (MSA)
-o- A202(Hor.)
*- A203(Hor.)
* Comp. ( Hor.)
0.0
0.2
0.4
Range 22 ( %CO2)
-------
Range 23 Water Response (CO2 Analyzers)
0.03
0.02
CM
O
o
55?
3=
Q
Q
"o
-0.01
-0.02
o- A001 ( MSA )
-*- A002(MSA)
-« A003(MSA)
*- A004(MSA)
Comp. ( MSA )
-o- A202 ( Hor.)
+ A203 ( Hor.)
-*- Comp. ( Hor.)
-0.03
Range 23 ( %CO2)
-------
Range 24 Water Response (CO2 Analyzers )
0.04
CM
O
o
0)
0.02
0.00
-0.02
-0.04
-0.06
-Q- A001 ( MSA )
*- A002(MSA)
a- A003(MSA)
*- A004(MSA)
-- Comp. ( MSA }
o- A202 ( Hor.)
-*- A203(Hor.)
* Comp. ( Hor.)
Range 24 (%CO2)
w
N)
-------
ATTACHMENT F
CC-2 Analyzer Reading Changes
Over Range of Barometer Change (28.5-29.25" Hg)
Regression:
Rdg(%C02)=
m Baro("Hg)-»-b
min. R for
95% Conf.
of correlation
Analyzer
Reading
Change (%A)
over range
of Barometer
change (from
regression)
Analyzer
Reading
Change (Z&)
over + l"Hg
Barometer
change (from
regression)
R22
Horiba
MSA
R23
Horiba
MSA
R24
Hori.ba
UC02)
Sec.
Std.
N T
15 .4812
15 .4812
15 1.3480
15 1.3480
10 2.1100
m
b
.86675E-3
.45694
.32712E-2
.38534
. 19490E-2
1.2915
.46397E-2
1.2199
. 18248E-2
Corr.
Coef.
R
0.339
0.631
0.337
0.518
Does %A» ZA*
Correlation (max-min)xlOO(max-min
Rmin Exist? max max
0.514 no +0.13 +0.18
0.514 yes +0.51 +0.68
0.514 no +0.11 +0.14
0.514 yes +0.26 +0.34
MSA 10 2.1100 .24822E-1
1.3919 0.668 0.632 yes
+0.07
+0.88
+0.09
+ 1.17
1074e
-------
ATTACHMENT G
C02 Analyzer
Vehicle Bag Sample Data
Two repeated readings on each bag
No Barometer Changes bet ween readings
Range
N
R22 (0-1*)
Horiba 8 prs
MSA 8 prs
R23 (0-2.5*)
Horiba 9 prs
MSA 9 prs
R24 (0-5*)
Horiba 6 prs
MSA 6 prs
Analyzer
(from all
Mean
X
.6520
.6551
1.1537
1.1679
1.6348
1.6545
Readings 0
readings)
2
Range
.4984
.5015
.4981
.5138
.8615
.8878
5C02)
.7577
.7599
2.1924
2.1995
2.2448
2.2621
Bag Sample
Std. Dev.
*C02
S pooled
.002332
.001157
.001796
.001383
.002625
.005965
*CV
S-100
X
0.36
0.18
0.16
0.12
0.16
0.36
1 H = Number of Sample Bags, each bag contained a different C02
concentration, and was read twice.
2 These values represent approximate lowest and highest bag concentrations
in the bag set.
Formula from EPA QAMS (3/30/84), Chapter 5, page 8
-------
C02 Analyzer
Background Bag Data
Two repeated readings on each bag
No Barometer Changes between readings
G-l
N
Analyzer Readings (%
(from all readings)
Mean x
Range
Background Bag
Std. Dev.
% C02
S pooled
R22 (0-1
Horiba
MSA
*)
8 prs
8 prs
. 04085
.04673
. 03680
.04180
.04850
.05390
.0007115
.001521
R23 (0-2.5*)
Horiba 9 prs
MSA 9 prs
.04122
.04864
.03830
.04270
.04520
.05770
.0006916
.002256
R24 (0-55?)
Horiba 6 prs
MSA 6 prs
.04123
.04798
.03650
.04400
.04320
.05500
.0009815
.001834
-------
G-2
C02 Analyzer
Corrected Concentration (Sample - Background) Bag Data
Two repeated readings on each bag
No Barometer Changes bet teen readings
Analyzer Readings (% C02)
(from all readings)
Corrected
Concentration
Std.
Dev. % CV
N
R22 (0-158)
Horiba 8 prs
MSA 8 prs
Mean *
.6111
.6084
Range
.4598
.4588
.7164
.7135
S pooled S»100
.002271 0.37
.001905 0.31
R23 (0-2.5?)
Horiba 9 prs
MSA 9 prs
1.1125
1.1192
.4588
.4668
2.1531
2.1547
.001697
.003466
0.15
0.31
R24 (0-55?)
Horiba 6 prs 1.5936
MSA 6 prs 1.6065
.8250
.8438
2.2016
2.2108
.002802
.005442
0.17
0.34
0924e
-------
Horiba CO2 NDIR Analyzer Wet Precision
RANGE 22
RANGE 23
RANGE 24
Duplicates
XI. X2
(%CO2)
0.6209
0.6119
0.7567
0.7577
0.7492
0.7492
0.6209
0.6209
0.6375
0.6355
0.6720
0.6720
0.4984
0.4984
0.6657
0.6647
Average
Xa
- [X1+X2J/2
(%CO2)
0.6164
0.7572
0.7492
0.6209
0.6365
0.6720
0.4984
0.6652
Range
R
- |X1-X2|
(%CO2)
0.009
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.002
0.000
0.000
0.001
Relative Range
RR
- [R/Xa] x 100
(% of ot.)
1.460
0.132
0.000
0.000
0.314
0.000
0.000
0.150
Average RR
0.237
Duplicates
XI. X2
(%CO2)
1.2451
1.2503
1.1431
1.1431
1.3490
1.3517
0.6104
0.6081
0.9714
0.9714
0.8124
0.8100
0.5003
0.4981
2.1924
2.1924
1.5571
1.5599
Average
Xa
- [XUX2)/2
(%C02)
1.2477
1.1431
1.3504
0.6093
0.9714
0.8112
0.4992
2.1924
1.5585
Range
R
- |X1-X2|
(%CO2)
0.005
0.000
0.000
0.002
0.000
0.002
0.002
0.000
0.003
Relative Range
RR
- [R/Xa] x 100
(% of pt.)
0.417
0.000
0.000
0.378
0.000
0.296
0.441
0.000
0.180
Average RR
0.212
Duplicates
XI. X2
(%CO2)
0.9106
0.9147
1.8190
1.8190
2.2397
2.2448
0.8656
0.8615
1.7902
1.7854
2.1838
2.1838
Average
Xa
- [X1+X2J/2
(%CO2)
0.9127
1.8190
2.2423
0.8636
1.7878
2.1838
Range
R
- |X1-X2|
(%C02)
0.004
0.000
0.005
0.004
0.005
0.000
Relative Range
RR
- [R/Xa] x 100
(% of pt.)
0.449
0.000
0.227
0.475
0.268
0.000
Average RR
0.240
U>
-------
ATTACHMENT H
C02 Analyzer
Mid - Span Data - Dry Gas
From Different rays
with Barometer Changes Bet wen Readings
Bias
X-T
Range
Horiba
MSA
23
Horiba
MSA
24
Horiba
MSA
N
15
15
15
15
10
10
Average
Analyzer
Reading
X
(£C02)
.48203
.48006
1.3480
1.3544
2.1003
2.1081
Sec.
Std.
T
(%C02)
.4812
.4812
1 . 3480
1.3480
2.1100
2.1100
.00083
-.00114
0.0
.00640
-.00970
-.00190
Bias
Percent Std.
(X-T)xlOO Dev.
T S
(*)
0.17
-0.24
0.0
0.47
-0.46
0.09
.00070
.00143
.00132
.00204
.00258
.00565
0.15
0.30
0.10
0.15
0.12
0.27
-------
Si*}
tA IX I
n
is
MSA
-------
-------
-SPAM Cne,8
2.IOJ1
>2/Wa»
29,03
iZ/9fef
28.71
-O.IO
46.Z
2.09^9
-0.06
Z9.03
OA9
so.r
/too*
-------
**********************************
* SAC SUMMARY STATISTICS *
* ANALYSIS OF DEVIATIONS *
* FROM LAB AVERAGE FOR C02 *
**********************************
PERIOD OF ANALYSIS: 1- 1-88 TO 8-10-88
PROCESSED: 10:32:53 NOV 3, 1988
SITE
NO
A001
A002
A003
A004
A009
A202
A203
RANGE
21
RANGE
5000 PPM
N MEAN SIGMA
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
.0
.0
.0
.0
,0
,0
.0
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0,
0.
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
22
RANGE
1 PCT
N MEAN SIGMA
91
73
96
57
72
90
89
-0
0
0
-0
0
-0
-0
. 16
. 1 1
.69
. 24
.58
.42
.54
0.579
0.779
0.653
0.764
0.607
0.659
0.665
N
48
65
51
54
61
46
47
23
RANGE
3 PCT
MEAN
0
0
0
0
0
-0
-1 .
.04
.08
.22
. 18
. 70
.56
.02
SIGMA
0
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
.471
.379
. 398
.614
. 398
.624
.591
24
ALL RANGES
5 PCT
N MEAN
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.
0
0.
0
0.
0
0,
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
SIGMA
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
N
139
138
147
1 1 1
133
136
136
MEAN
-0
0
0
-o
0
-0.
-0.
.09
.09
.53
.04
.64
.47
, 71
SIGMA
0.551
0.622
0.617
0. 724
0.523
0.649
0.678
ALL
0.0
0.0
568
0.00 0.807
372 -0.01 0.713 0 0.0 0.0
SIGMA VALUE AS OF 3-28-81
ANALYSIS OF ALL SITES AND RANGES
AVERAGE VS THEORETICAL % DIFFERENCE
940 -0.00 0.771
0. 75U
125 - 1 . 22 2.141'
H
>
n
PC
s
w
2;
-------
Comparison of MSA CO2 Analyzers'
Response to H2O ( R23 Only)
(0
c
o
Q.
CO
-------
0)
CO
>»
O
0>
CO
c
O
Q.
CO
0)
DC
Comparison of HORIBA CO2 Analyzers'
Response to H2O ( R23 Only)
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1.2
0.0
0.5
1.5
2.0
2.5
-a Comparator
A202
-o A203
Cyl. Cone. (%CO2)
-------
.
oyi.
ury (
if ) Wet ( %CO2 )
A004 Wet Data ( R23 )
W-D Diff. W-D %fs Diff. W-D %pt Diff.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2.4120
1.8730
1.6050
1.2060
0.9696
0.8017
0.4812
0.3647
0.0000
2.4174
1.8809
1.6119
1.2087
0.9702
0.8017
0.4809
0.3645
0.0019
2.4048
1.8693
1.6008
1.2036
0.9677
0.8017
0.4831
0.3666
0.0134
-0.013
-0.012
-0.011
-5.1008-3
-2.500e-3
0.000
2.2006-3
2.100e-3
0.011
-0.520
-0.480
-0.440
-0.204
-0.100
0.000
0.088
0.084
0.440
-0.538
-0.638
-0.682
-0.422
-0.258
0.000
0.458
0.576
578.900
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2.4120
1.8730
1.6050
1.2060
0.9696
0.8017
0.4812
0.3647
0.0000
Cyl. Cone. R23
2.4120
2.1100
1.8730
1.3480
0.9696
0.5900
0.3647
0.2550
0.0000
Cyl. Cone. R23
2.4120
2.1100
1.8730
1.3480
0.9696
0.5900
0.3647
0.2550
0.0000
Dry ( %CO2 ) Wet { %CO2 )
A202 Wet Data ( R23 )
W-D Diff. W-D %fs Diff. W-D %pt Diff.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2.4120
2.1100
1.8730
1.3480
0.9696
0.5900
0.3647
0.2550
0.0000
2.4165
2.1078
1.8714
1.3426
0.9606
0.5812
0.3596
0.2504
0.0076
2.4042
2.0930
1.8571
1.3294
0.9508
0.5744
0 3553
0.2484
0.0057
-0.012
-0.015
-0.014
-0.013
-9.800e-3
-6.8006-3
-4.300e-3
-2.0006-3
-1.900e-3
-0.480
-0.600
-0.560
-0.520
-0.392
-0.272
-0.172
-0.080
-0.076
-0.497
-0.712
-0.748
-0.968
-1.000
-1.200
-1.200
-0.799
-25.000
Dry ( %CO2 ) Wet ( %CO2 )
A203 Wet Data ( R23 )
W-D Diff. W-D %fs Diff. W-D %pt Diff.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2.4120
2.1100
1.8730
1.3480
0.9696
0.5900
0.3647
0.2550
0.0000
2.4139
2.1117
1.8769
1.3529
0.9707
0.5921
0.3669
0.2573
0.0060
2.3988
2.0914
1.8572
1.3373
0.9585
0.5829
0.3604
0.2530
0.0060
-0.015
-0.020
-0.020
-0.016
-0.012
-9.200e-3
-6.5006-3
-4.3006-3
0.000
-0.600
-0.800
-0.800
-0.640
-0.480
-0.368
-0.260
-0.172
0.000
-0.621
-0.947
-1.100
-1.200
-1.200
-1.600
-1.800
-1.700
0.000
-------
A001 Wet Data ( R23 )
Cyl. Cone. R23 Dry ( %CO2 ) Wet ( %CO2 )
W-D Diff. W-D %fs Diff. W-D %pt Diff.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2.4120
1.8730
1.6050
1.2060
0.9696
0.8017
0.4812
0.3647
0.0000
Cyl Cone. R23
2.4120
1.8730
1.6050
1.2060
0.9696
0.8017
0.4812
0.3647
0.0000
Cyl. Cone. R23
2.4120
1.8730
1.6050
1.2060
0.9696
0.8017
0.4812
0.3647
0.0000
2.4102
1.8823
1.6131
1.2131
0.9733
0.8077
0.4842
0.3672
0.0019
Dry ( %CO2 )
2.4105
1.8691
1.6012
1.2020
0.9670
0.7981
0.4809
0.3637
0.0020
Dry ( %CO2 )
2.4102
1.8697
1.5997
1.1958
0.9587
0.7910
0.4731
0.3595
0.0019
2.4040
1.8737
1.5966
1.2080
0.9708
0.8030
0.4820
0.3672
0.0078
Wet ( %CO2 )
2.4043
1.8634
1.5930
1.1969
0.9621
0.7958
0.4809
0.3637
0.0080
Wet ( %CO2 )
2.4059
1.8669
1.5942
1.1933
0.9587
0.7910
0.4775
0.3638
0.0134
-5
6.2006-3
8.600e-3
-0.016
1006-3
2.5006-3
4.7006-3
2.2006-3
0.000
5.9006-3
-0.248
-0.344
-0.640
-0.204
-0.100
-0.188
-0.088
0.000
0.236
-0.257
-0.457
-0.992
-0.420
-0.257
-0.582
-0.454
0.000
310.500
A002 Wet Data ( R23 )
W-D Diff. W-D %fs Diff. W-D %pt Diff.
-6.2006-3
-5.7006-3
-6.2006-3
-5.1006-3
-4.9006-3
-2.300e-3
0.000
0.000
6.0006-3
-0.248
-0.228
-0.328
-0.204
-0.196
-0.092
0.000
0.000
0.240
-0.257
-0.305
-0.512
-0.424
-0.507
-0.288
0.000
0.000
300.000
A003 Wet Data ( R23 )
W-D Diff. W-D %fs Diff. W-D %pt Diff.
-4.3006-3
-2.8006-3
-5.5006-3
-2.5006-3
0.000
0.000
4.4006-3
4.3006-3
0.011
-0.172
-0.112
-0.220
-0.100
0.000
0.000
0.176
0.172
0.440
-0.178
-0.150
-0.344
-0.209
0.000
0.000
0.930
1.200
578.900
i
.p-
-------
Mat
&5A
/^ 5 A
10
it
II
"
2.^/20
. //oo
96 -
. 'S
77. &
, /.
/
43,6,
- 7
...
01
-------
Bubbled CO2 Differences
Analyzer Agreement vs. Sample Spec. Hum.
H
a
w
I
3=
Q
2.3808% CO2
1.6013% CO2
1.2088%CO2
0.9515% CO2
0.4060% CO2
0.0941 %CO2
0.0295% CO2
ZERO GAS
-0.6
-5
Specific Humidity (grains/pound)
-------
Bubbled CO2 Differences
o
o
!t X
5 "
. in
Best fit least squares regression :
A%F.S.Diff. = -0.003198 x Spec. Hum. (gr/lb)
r2 = 0.18
-0.6
95
Specific Humidity (gr/lb)
-------
J-2
BUBBLED C02 CYLINDER DATA
Data
3/18/88
8/24/88
8/25/88
8/31/88
8/12/88
Calibration
Data
8/1 8/88
Calibration
Data
Cyl. Cone.
( %CO2 )
2.3803
1.2088
0.4060
0.0941
0.029S
2.3803
1.2088
0.4060
0.0941
0.0295
2.3803
1.2088
0.4060
0.0941
0.0295
2.3808
1.2088
0.4060
0.0941
0.0295
2.3808
1.2088
0.4060
0.0941
0.0295
2.3808
1.2088
0.4060
0.0941
0.0295
2.3808
1.2088
0.4060
0.0941
0.0295
2.3808
1.2088
0.4060
0.0941
0.029S
2.3808
1.2088
0.4060
0.0941
0.0295
2.3808
1.6013
0.9515
0.4060
0.0000
2.3808
1.6013
0.9515
0.4060
0.0000
2.3808
1.6013
0.95'iS
0.4060
0.0000
2.3803
1.9123
1.6013
1.2088
0.9515
0.7991
0.49S9
0.4060
2.3803
1.9123
1.6013
1.2088
0.9515
0.7991
0.4959
0.4060
SpscHum.
SH
( or./lb )
30.88
30.26
31.00
30.88
30.51
44.33
43.32
44.16
43.82
43.99
58.29
55.93
56.99
56.14
55.72
34.23
33.42
33.69
33.69
33.69
49.19
47.52
48.81
47.71
48.07
65.22
63.08
64.98
66.44
68.94
33.44
32.26
32.91
32.78
32.65
54.71
52.88
53.89
52.68
52.68
64.36
61.77
62.94
62.01
62.24
36.98
37.71
38.01
36.26
37.12
52.09
51.30
51.50
52.29
53.69
92.42
90.78
90.14
91.44
92.42
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
or. RagponM
H
( %C02 )
2.3733
1.2075
0.4039
0.0961
0.0298
2.3673
1.2049
0.4039
0.0961
0.0318
2.3583
1.1975
0.4018
0.0961
0.0318
2.3738
1.2047
0.4061
0.0971
0.0321
2.3647
1.1996
0.4018
0.0951
0.0301
2.3556
1.1945
0.4018
0.0951
0.0301
2.3680
1.2021
0.4037
0.0948
0.0300
2.3559
1.1970
0.4015
0.0968
0.0300
2.3529
1.1970
0.4015
0.0948
0.0300
2.3706
1.5936
0.9453
0.4048
0.0020
2.361S
1.5882
0.9429
0.4004
0.0000
2.3494
1.5801
0.9356
0.3983
0.0020
2.3798
1.9125
1.6014
1.2098
0.9510
0.7975
0.4967
0.4061
2.3793
1.9141
1.6002
1.2100
0.9501
0.7984
0.4967
0.4060
SARospons*
M
( %CO2 )
2.3783
1.2048
0.4060
0.0999
0.0317
2.3753
1.2074
0.4081
0.0959
0.0317
2.3598
1.1972
0.4038
0.0999
0.0337
2.3635
1.2041
0.4053
0.0986
0.0340
2.3666
1.2041
0.4053
0.0986
0.0380
2.3635
1.2041
0.4119
0.1027
0.0400
2.3816
1.2099*
0.4111
0.0992
0.0403
2.3691
1.2023
0.4090
0.1012
0.0382
2.3536
1.1947
0.4046
0.1012
0.0382
2.3807
1.6011
0.9510
0.4105
0.0040
2.3621
1.5875
0.9445
0.3996
0.0000
2.3590
1.5875
0.9396
0.4018
0.0079
2.3802
1.9128
1.6010
1.2088
0.9489
0.8024
0.4955
0.4057
2.3814
1.9128
1.5958
1.2125
0.9532
0.7975
0.4981
0.4038
or-MSA Dill
H - M
( %C02 )
0.0050
0.0027
-0.0021
-0.0038
-0.0019
-0.0080
-0.0025
-0.0042
0.0002
0.0001
0.0015
0.0003
0.0020
0.0038
-0.0019
0.0103
0.0006
0.0008
-0.0015
-0.0019
-0.0019
-0.0045
-0.0035
0.0035
0.0079
0.0079
0.0096
-0.0101
0.0076
-0.0099
0.0136
0.0078
0.0074
-0.0044
-0.0103
0.0132
0.0053
-0.0075
0.0044
0.0082
-0.0007
0.0023
-0.0031
-0.0064
-0.0082
-0.0101
0.0075
-0.0065
0.0057
-0.0020
-0.0006
0.0007
-0.0016
0.0008
0.0000
-0.0096
0.0074
-0.0040
-0.0035
-0.0059
-0.0004
-0.0003
0.0004
0.0010
0.0021
-0.0049
0.0012
0.0004
-0.0021
0.0013
0.0044
-0.0025
-0.0031
0.0009
0.0014
0.0022
% pi. Diff.
soobatow
( % M pt )
-0.210
0.224
-0.517
-3.804
-5.994
0.337
-0.207
-1.029
0.209
0.315
-0.064
0.025
-0.495
3.804
5.638
0.436
0.050
0.197
-1.521
-5.588
-0.080
-0.374
-0.864
3.550
-20.789
-0.334
-0.797
2.452
7.400
24.750
0.571
0.645
1.800
4.435
25.558
-0.557
-0.441
-1.834
-4.348
-21.466
-0.030
0.193
0.766
6.324
-21.466
-0.424
-0.468
-0.683
-1.389
-50.000
-0.025
0.044
-0.169
0.200
0.000
-0.407
-0.466
-0.426
-0.871
-74.684
-0.017
-0.016
0.025
0.083
0.221
-0.611
0.242
0.099
-0.088
0.068
0.276
-0.206
-0.325
0.113
-0.281
0.545
% F.S. Diff.
M* baton*
[ % R23 i
-0.200
0.108
0.084
-0.152
-0.076
-0.320
-0 100
-0.168
0.008
0.004
-0.060
0.012
-0.080
-0.152
-0.076
0.412
0.024
0.032
-0.060
-0.076
0.076
0.180
0.140
-0.140
-0.316
-0.316
-0.384
0.404
-0.304
-0.396
-0.544
-0.312
-0.296
-0.176
-0.412
-0.528
-0.212
-0.300
-0.176
-0.328
-0.028
0.092
-0.124
0.256
0.328
0.404
-0.300
0.260
-0.228
-0.080
-0.024
0.028
-0.064
0.032
0.000
-0.384
-0.296
-0.160
-0.140
-0.236
-0.016
-0.012
0.016
0.040
0.084
-0.196
0.048
0.016
-0.084
0.052
0.176
-0.100
-0.124
0.036
-0.056
0.088
%pt.Diff. =[(H - M)/M]x100
%F.S. Diff. =[(H - M)/2.5]x100
-------
CO2 Comparison Equipment Set-Up
SITE BENCH
> f
- - Cal. Port
CO2
NV
NV
Bubbler
"Variable Bubbler"
Temp.
DV
Press.
DV
HORIBA Test Module
PR
FM
NV
SITE NDIR Module
PR
I 1
I
FM
NV
Dump
-------
Means & 95% C.l.s for
Vehicle Bag CO2 Diff.s
0.2
-0.0
-0.2
% (of sample pt.) Diff.
(see below)
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1.0
Background Bags
n = 11
Sample Bags
' Corr. Conc.s'
n=11
0.2
-0.0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1.0
% pt. Difference
(see below)
n
w
2
Sample %Sam Diff.
II U. t«. > / K 1 ..
-------
Vehicle Bag CO2 Differences
o
o
«*! w
* "
5 «
"?
LL >.
0.2
-0.0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-5
15
35
55
75
95
Specific Humidity (gr/lb)
-------
Corrected Concentration Differences
HORIBA - MSA
K-2
CM
O
O
o
!£ o
52
o o
c o
o r
o ^
o
O
o
5 x
Q. o
o -^.
c *-*
o o
O o
o
I
2= O
5?
Oft1 -
Onn -
0m -
0
On -
o o -
-U.t
OA
A
ft C -
-u.o
-ft R -
1 n -
-1 .U
0
Oft -
.u
00 _
.i ~
A
0
-
\ **
* *
*
I i 1 . 1 . 1 .
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.
MSA Corr. Cone. ( %CO2 )
A..*.
_
A ,
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2
MSA Corr. Cone. ( %CO2 )
#
*
»
* »
i i i i
.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2
5
.5
.5
MSA Corr. Cone. (%C02)
-------
Test
8/18/88
8/25/88
8/31/88
9/23/88
Test
JK"
2-bag LA-4
Van
2-bag LA-4
HEPCA
2-bag LA-4
HEPCA
2-bag LA-4
REPCA
Hwy
REPCA
2-bag LA-4
W.Nova
**
B1
SI
B2
S2
B1
Si
B2
S2
B1
SI
B2
S2
B1
Si
B2
S2
B3
S3
B1
Si
B2
S2
HOR1BA
H
(%CO2)
0.0378
1.3680
0.0398
1.0066
0.1440
2.0497
0.1152
1.9950
0.0339
1.1284
0.0359
0.7587
0.0339
1.1259
0.0339
0.7610
0.0339
1.8002
0.0359
1.6153
0.0359
1.2120
MSA
M
(%CO2)
0.0377
1.3811
0.0397
1.0144
0.1485
2.0539
0.1156
2.0039
0.0358
1.1344
0.0358
0.7638
0.0398
1.1344
0.0378
0.7708
0.0378
1.8158
0.0398
1.6231
0.0398
1.2200
Specific
i~iwiuiun*y'
SH
(gr/lb)
43.985
64.928
44.160
66.386
53.963
72.163
52.154
67.534
48.710
67.008
48.896
65.099
49.287
65.320
50.426
65.078
50.218
71.831
44.532
74.199
41.212
77.801
HORBA
tSHUIIWH
Factor
OFh
(see
9.80
13.31
6.54
6.72
11.88
17.66
11.90
17.61
7.44
8.30
11.06
MSA
UfllUllull
Factor
OFm
below )
9.70
13.21
6.52
6.69
11.81
17.54
11.81
17.38
7.38
8.26
10.98
Hor-MSA
l/MICI Olll>O
H - M
(%CO2)
0.0001
-0.0131
0.0001
-0.0078
-0.0045
-0.0042
-0.0004
-0.0089
0.0019
-0.0060
0.0001
-0.0051
-0.0059
-0.0085
-0.0039
-0.0098
-0.0039
-0.0156
-0.0039
-0.0078
-0.0039
-0.0080
Hor-MSA
H - M
(ppm)
1.00
-131.00
1.00
-78.00
-45.00
-42.00
-4.00
-89.00
-19.00
-60.00
1.00
-51.00
-59.00
-85.00
-39.00
-98.00
-39.00
-156.00
39.00
-78.00
-39.00
-80.00
BacHgmd
see below
(%FS H23)
0.0040
0.0040
-0.1800
-0.0160
-0.0760
0.0040
-0.2360
-0.1560
-0.1560
-0.1560
-0.1560
STOOEV
0.0880
AVERAGE
-0.1018
95% C.I.
-.04.-. 16)
Backgrnd
see below
(%MSA Sam)
0.0072
0.0099
-0.2191
-0.0200
-0.1675
0.0131
-0.5201
-0.5060
-0.2148
-0.2403
-0.3197
STDDEV
0.1945
AVERAGE
-0.1979
95% C.I.
(-.07. -.33)
Sample
»ro Ulll
see below
(%FS H23)
-0.5240
-0.3120
-0.1680
-0.3560
-0.2400
-0.2040
-0.3400
-0.3920
-0.6240
-0.3120
-0.3200
STDDEV
0.1331
AVERAGE
-0.3447
95% C.I.
-.26. -.43)
Sample
fcaam uin
see below
(%MSA Sam)
-0.9485
-0.7689
-0.2045
-0.4441
-0.5289
-0.6677
-0.7493
-1.2714
-0.8591
-0.4806
-0.6557
STDOEV
0.2848
AVERAGE
-0.6890
95% C.I.
(-.50, -.88)
HORBA
oorr.i>onc
Hoc
see below
(%CO2)
1.3341
0.9698
1.9277
1.8970
1.0974
0.7248
1.0948
0.7290
1.7709
1.5837
1.1793
MSA
OUfl AxUlll
Mcc
see below
(%CO2)
1.3473
0.9777
1.9282
1.9056
1.1016
0.7300
1.0980
0.7352
1.7831
1.5881
1.1838
Corr. Cone.
joro unit
see below
(%FS H23)
-0.5291
-0.3166
-'0.0174
-0.3455
-0.1710
-0.2083
-0.1248
-0.2460
-0.4907
-0.1757
-0.1791
PTDDEV
0.1541
AVERAGE
-0.2549
95% C.I.
-.15. -.36)
Corr. Cone.
-fefjl. Lflll
see below
(%MSA CC)
-0.9817
-0.8096
-0.0226
-0.4532
-0.3882
-0.7134
-0.2843
-0.8364
-0.6880
-0.2766
-0.3781
STDDEV
0.2943
AVERAGE
-0.5302
95% C.I.
(-.33. -.73)
Background %F.S. DM.
Background %Sam Diff.
Sample %F.S. Diff.
Sample %Sam Diff.
l(Hb- Mb)/2.5]x100
[(HD- Mb)/Ms]x100
((Hs- Ms)/2.5Jx100
[(Hs- Ms)/Ms]x100
Horiba Corr. Cone. (
MSA Corr. Cone. (
Corr. Cone. %F.S. Diff
Corr. Cone. %pt. Diff.
- Hs - Hb( 1 - 1/DF)
- MS- Mb(1- 1/DF)
- [(Hoc- Mcc)/2.5]x100
- [(Hcc-Mcc)/Mcc]x100
Dilution Factor (for study ) = 13.4/%CO2
-------
CO2 Comparison Equipment Set-Up
SITE BENCH
+ Cal.Port
;co2
NV
NV
Bubbler
"Variable Bubbler"
Temp.
DV
Press.
DV
HORIBA Test Module
PR
FM
NV
/7.
SITE NDIR Module
PR
FM
Dump
-------
Test
Date
8/18/88
8/25/88
8/31/88
9/23/88
Test
Type
2-bag LA-4
Van
2-bag LA-4
FEPCA
2-bag LA-4
REPCA
2-b«g LA-4
REPCA
Hwy
FEPCA
2-bag LA-4
W.Nora
Bag
at
SI
B2
S2
B1
SI
B2
S2
B1
SI
B2
S2
B1
SI
B2
S2
83
S3
B1
SI
B2
S2
HORBA
Cone.
H
f%CO2)
0.0378
t.3680
0.0398
1.0066
0.1440
2.0487
0.1152
1.99SO
0.0339
1.1284
0.0359
0.7587
0.0339
1.1259
0.0339
0.7610
0.0339
1.8002
0.0359
1.6153
0.0359
1.2120
MSA
Cone
M
(%CO2)
0.0377
1.3811
0.0397
1.0144
0.1485
2.0539
0.1156
2.0039
0.0358
1.1344
0.0358
0.7638
0.0398
1.1344
0.0378
0.7708
0.0378
1.8158
0.0398
1.6231
0.0398
1.2200
Specific
Humidity
SH
43.985
64.928
44.160
66.386
53.963
72.163
52.154
67.534
48.710
67.008
48.896
65.099
49.287
65.320
50.426
65.078
50.218
71.831
44.532
74.199
41.212
77.801
X-T calc from
Rogr. Formula
K
-0.00351660
-0.00519099
-0.00353059
-0.00530756
-0.00431434
-0.00576943
-0.00416971
-0.00539934
-0.00389436
0.00535729
-0.00390924
-0.00520467
-0.00394050
-0.00522233
-0.00403156
-0.00520299
-0.00401493
-0.00574289
-0.00356033
-0.00593221
-0.00329490
-0.00622019
HORBA
Cort. loi -K-
Hc-H-K
0.04131660
1.37319099
0.04333059
1.01190756
0.14831434
2.05546943
0.11936971
2.00039934
0.03779436
1.13375729
0.03980924
0.76390467
0.03784050
1.13112233
0.03793156
0.76620299
0.03791493
1.80594289
0.03946033
1.62123221
0.03919480
1.21822019
Corr.loi K
HORBA
Dilution
Factor
9.76
13.24
6.52
6.70
11.82
17.54
11.85
17.49
7.42
8.27
11.00
MSA
Dilution
Factor
9.70
13.21
6.52
6.69
11.81
17.54
11.81
17.38
7.38
8.26
10.98
Corr. for K
Hor-MSA
Difference
He- M
0.0036
-0.0079
0.0036
-0.0025
-0.0002
0.0016
0.0038
-0.0035
0.0020
-0.0006
0.0040
0.0001
0.0020
-0.0033
0.0001
-0.0046
0.0001
-0.0098
-0.0003
-0.0010
-0.0006
0.0018
Corr.lor K
Hor-MSA
Difference
Hc-M
\fff"i
36.17
-79.09
36.31
24.92
-1.86
15.89
37.70
-35.01
19.94
6.43
40.09
1.05
-19.60
-32.78
1.32
-45.97
1.16
-98.57
-3.40
-18.68
-6.06
-17.80
Corr.tor K
Backgrnd
%F.S. DM
Me below
0.1447
0.1452
0.0074
0.1508
0.0798
0.1604
-0.0784
0.0053
0.0046
-0.0136
-0.0242
STODEV
0.0864
AVBVCE
0.0516
95* C.L
1.11. -.01)
Corr.tor K
Backgmd
%S*mD»t
eebetow
0.2619
0.3579
-0.0090
0.1881
0.1758
0.5249
-0.1727
0.0171
0.0063
-0.0209
0.0496
STODEV
0.2056
AVBVCE
0.1163
95% C.L
(.25. -.04)
Corr.lor K
Sample
%FS Oil
lee below
,-- ..«,
-0.3164
-0.0997
0.0628
-0.1400
0.0257
0.0042
0.1311
0.1839
-0.3943
-0.0747
-0.0712
STODEV
0.1344
AVBVCE
-0.1245
95% C.L
(-.03. -.22)
Corr.tor K
Sample
%SamDm
aa below
,_., »-.,,
0.5727
-0.2457
0.0764
-0.1747
-0.0567
0.0137
-0.2889
-0.5964
-0.5429
-0.1151
0.1459
STODEV
0.2364
AVERAGE
-0.2408
95% C.I.
(-.07. -.41)
Corr lor K
HORBA
Corr.Ccnc.
Hoc
(%CO2)
1.3361
0.9718
1.9299
1.8988
1.0992
0.7264
1.0965
0.7304
1.7731
1.5865
1.1826
Corr.lor K
MSA
Corr.Conc.
Moo
(%C02)
1.3473
0.9777
1.9282
1.9056
1.1016
0.7300
1.0980
0.7352
1.7831
1.5881
1.1838
Corr.lor K
Con*. Cone.
%FSDn
»ae below
0.4471
-0.2342
0.0698
0.2695
-0.0988
-0.1470
0.0597
0.1894
-0.3994
-0.0630
-0.0494
STODEV
0.1565
AVERAGE
0.1716
95% C.I.
-.06. -.28)
Corr.tor K
Corr.Conc.
%pl. DIM
tee below
-0.8296
-0.5990
0.0904
-0.3536
-0.2242
-0.5035
-0.1360
-0.6439
-0.5599
-0.0992
0.1043
STODEV
0.2870
AVERAGE
-0.3603
95% C.L
(-.15. -.55)
n
M
H
tr>
Background %F.S. Diff.
Background %Sam Diff.
Sample %F.S. Diff.
Sample %Sam Diff.
[(Hb- Mb)/2.5]x100
[(Hb- Mb)/Ms]x100
l(Hs- Ms)/2.5]x100
l(Hs- Ms)/Ms]x100
Horiba Corr. Cone.
MSA Corr. Cone. (
Corr.Conc. %F.S. Diff
Corr.Conc. %pt. Diff.
- Hs- Hb(1- 1/DF)
- MS- Mb(1- 1/DF)
- l(Hcc- Mcc)/2.5]x100
- l(Hcc- Mcc)/Mcc]x100
Dilution Factor (for study ) = 13.4/%CO2
-------
0.4
0.2
-0.0
% (of sample pt.) Diff. .0 2
(see below)
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
Means & 95% C.l.s for
Vehicle Bay CG2 Diff.s
(corr. for H2O vapor)
Background Bags
n = 11
Sample Bags
n = 11
Corr. Conc.s
0.4
0.2
-0.0
_02 % pt. Difference
(see below)
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
Background %Sam DiH.
Sample %Sam Did.
l(Hb- Mb)/Ms)x100
|(HS- Ms)/Ms]x100
Corr. Cone. %pt. Dili.
- MCC)/MCC 1x100
-------
0.2'
Vehicle Exhaust Bag
CO2 Differences
Corrected for H2O Vapor
-0.0
o
o
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-5
i
15
i
35
55
75
95
Specific Humidity (gr/lb)
r1
NJ
-------
CJ
O
O
0.02'
0.01
Corrected Concentration CO2 Differences
HORIBA - MSA (Corr. for "K")
L-3
o
O o
01
0.00
-0.01
I m
o
o
-0.02
0.0
0.5 1.0 1.5
MSA corr. Cone. (%CO2)
2.0
2.5
5: ^
3 *
0.2'
0.0'
o >.
».
<> O
00
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1.0
-1.2
0.0
0.5 1.0 1.5
MSA Corr. Cone. (%CO2)
2.0
2.5
». O
*: o
a r-
0.2
0.0
^*
c: u
o u
02
II
-0.2
-0.4
" -0.6
0.0
0.5 1.0 1.5
MSA Corr. Cone. (%CO2)
2.0
2.5
-------
tuuirntNi ID t I
CALIBRATION NAME I
CALIBRATION !
TEST BITE t
CALIB DONE AT i
OPERATOR COHMENTI
789463
C02A-CR22
880811-104630
A2S1
14!12 08-10-88
EPA-MSA-R22-BLINE
*«* «**
t* ANALYZER CALIBRATION CURVE ANALYSIS ***
** ***
tit****************************************
----« = " = «= = «»- = = =» = KNUNN UK ntWSUKtll I Nru 1 b = =
EPACYLI VENDOR CVLID VCODE DATA HEAS
OR OR OR POINT HEFL
BLNCOD BLENDER RNG BLNRT TYPES XM
135139
33470
163287
B1103
B442
B1375
B916
337743
B2386
B2211
B1434
A-221
B1184
157656
2B6S91
063369
244214
391339
66207
1
I
1
tl
1
1
tl
1
11
1
It
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tt
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
NAHED
NAMED
NAHE6
NANED
NAHED
NANED
NAHED
NAHED
NAHED
NAHED
NAHED
95.40
81.40
71.40
61.90
52.10
43.00
23.30
13.10
97.00
81.70
74.40
61.30
30.60
38.90
27.30
13.80
10.60
6.60
3.20
NOHINAL ACTIVE
CONC EFS TONC
YH YE
0.9S13
0.7991
0.6923
0.3947
0.4959
0.4060
0.2344
0.1396
0.9696
0.8017
0.7260
0.5900
0.4B12
0.3647
0.2S50
0.12B2
0.0941
0.0606
0.0293
tl
tl
tl
tt
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
NOTE tit CYLINDER NOT DEFINED IN THE EQUIPMENT FILE SYSTEM.
NOTE t4: NO PREVIOUS ANALYZER CALIBRATION ON FILE IN THE EFS.
IOTE *t YS FOR NAHED CYLS IS PREVIOUS EFS CONC < UNSHIFTED) .
AA
AA
AH
AAA<
AA
AA
h<\
AA
HH
kAAA
AA
A/.
22 22
22
22
?22 2
ttftttt
or.
sr>
5 j
n
55
55
1
11
::::
*-* = i - 1 1 1\ v t i*un
FIT QUALITY OF NfV CURVE
DEFL CONC V
ZPOINT
XC YC (M-O/C
95.40 0.9516
81.40 0.7987
71.40 0.6929
61.90 0.5947
52.10 0.4957
43.00 0.4057
25.30 0.2351
13.10 0.1392
MEAN OF (ABP 2> =
97.00 0.9691
81.70 0.8*020
74.40 0.7244
61.30 0.3886
SO. 60 0.4808
38.90 0.3636
27.30 0.2541
13.80 0.1271
10.60 0.0974
6.60 0.0605
3.20 0.0293
HCAL" 1.0000 BCAL-
CFC-1 ZST=1 WFC-2
NEU. CALIB. N0= 880811-
XNL- 2.669 tINF'
0.01
-0.05
0.06
0.01
-0.04
-O.OB
0.30
0.27
0.10
-0.02
0.03
-0.22
-0.24
-0.09
0.26
-0.36
-0.83
3.41
-0.18
-0.81
0.000
DGF-3
104630
0
r Hf\ A ^un;j
SHIFT
DEFL
XS
t4
14
t4
4
14
4
14
4
MS =
CFC*
PRV.CAL
rrr
FROM PREVIOUS CURVE
CONC V
YS*
14
4
t4
4
14
4
14
14
11
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
It
It
tl
BS =
ZST= MFO
IB.NO=
ZSHIFT
(S-O/C
t4
14
t4
14
14
t4
t4
14
*1
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl '
tl
[iGF =
-
n/T lurrr II/T -
n
a
H
EQUATIONS AND COEFFICIENTS
**************************
X = (HCAL * X ) + BCAL
C H
A3*X
A4*X
HCAL
BCAL
0.1000000E 01
O.OOOOOOOE 00
A3*X
Al
A2
A3
A4
AS
A2*X
DEGREF FIT
Al -- FCT C02 /N2
O.OOOOOOOE 00
0.9126383E-02
0.5725509E-05
0.3321407E-07
O.OOOOOOOE 00
-------
PROD PROCESSED
Y EQUIPMENT ID I
CALIBRATION NAME
CALIBRATION t
TEST SITE
CALIB DONE AT
OPERATOR COMMENT
10!54!51 08-11-88
789443
C02A-CR22
680811-105451
A2S1
14212 08-10-88
EPA-MSA-R22-BLINE
*MMtM MASTER BITE MM****
*** «**
*** ANALYZER CALIBRATION CURVE ANALYSIS *»*
*** **»
************* **ttt***r****MMMMM MMM*
AAAAA
AA AA
AA AA
AA AA
AAAAAAA
AA AA
AA AA
22222
22 22
22
22
22
222 2
2222222
5055555
55
55
555555
55
jj TiO
55555
1
11
1 1
"« = « = * = = = = = " = = = = KNUMN OR MEASURE!'
EPACYLt
OR
BLNCOD
B2386
82211
B14S4
A-221
B1184
157636
286591
OA5369
155139
33470
1632B7
B1103
B442
B1375
B916
337743
244214
391S39
64207
NOTEJll
^ '
NOTE MJ
MflTF !
VENDOR CYLID
OR
BLENDER RNG
tl
1
t
1
1
1
11
tl
1
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
CYLINDER NOT
NO PREVIOUS
YB FflR NAMED
VCODE
OR
BLNRT
1
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
DEFINED
ANALYZER
r₯LS IB
DATA
POINT
TYPES
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
IN THE
INPUTS -=-
MEAS
DEFL
XM
97.00
81.70
74.40
61.30
50.60
38.90
27.30
13.80
95.40
81.40
71.40
61.90
52.10
43.00
25.30
15.10
10.60
6.60
3.20
EQUIPMENT
NOMINAL ACTIVE
CONC EFS
CONC
YM YE
0.9676
0.8017
0.7260
0.5900
0.4612
0.3A47
0.2550
0.1282
0.9515
0.7991
0.6925
0.5947
0.4959
0.4060
0.2344
0.1396
0.0941
0.0606
0.0295
FILE SYSTEM.
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
CALIBRATION ON FILE IN THE EFS.
pRFuinns FFS rnur (IIUGMI Firm .
i=_ = _i;i:.^_^u:: ::-^--- = = CURVE COMPARISONS
FIT QUALITY OF NEW CURUF.
DEFL CONG V ZPOINT
XC YC (M-O/C
97.00 0.9700 0.04
81.70 0.8023 0.07
74.40 0.7247 -0.1B
61.30 0.5891 -0.15
50.60 0.4814 0.04
38.90 0.3664 0.46
27.30 0.2548 -0.06
13.80 0.1277 -0.41
MEAN OF (ACS Z) = 0.18
95.40 0.7*521 0.04
81.40 0.7991 -0.00
71.40 0.6933 0.11
61.90 0.5952 0.09
52.10 0.4963 0.08
43.00 0.4064 0.09
25.30 0.2358 0.61
15.10 0.1398 0.16
10.60 0.0979 3.87
6.60 0.0608 0.35
3.20 0.0294 -0.23
MCAL" 1.0000 BCAL- 0.000
CFC-1 ZST-1 WFC = 2 DGF-3
NEU. CALIB. NO' 880811-105451
XNL* 2.637 tINF* 0
SHIFT
DEFL
XS
4
*4
4
14
4
14
4
14
MS -
CFC-
STi.-^^ = = === = = = =
FROM PREVIOUS
CONC Y
YS» (
t4
14
4
4
4
14
14
14
1
tl
tl
tl
1
1
1
tl
11
1
11
BS -
ZST= HFC=
CURVE
ZSMIFT
S-O/C
14
«4
»4
4
14
4
14
«4
11
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
liGF =
PRV.CALIB.NO=
cec
fi ./ T i k.i c~ t~ r* t* 1 1
HI. I Un L.UUC.
EQUATIONS AND COEFFICIENTS
**************************
X * (MCAL * X > + BCAL
C M
MCAL * 0.1000000E 01
BCAL O.OOOOOOOE 00
DEGREE FIT
A5*X t A4*X 4 A3*X * A?*X + Al = PCT C02 /N2
C C C C
Al - O.OOOOOOOE 00
A2 - 0.9182639E-02
A3 * 0.4470BBOE-05
A4 = 0.407764SE-07
: 3
-------
PNODIPROCESSED i
Y EQUIPMENT ID I
CfLIMATION NAHEt
CAUBRATION t I
TEST SITE
CALIB DONE AT
09J05J10 08-11-88
789433
C02A-CR23
880811-090310
A2S1
O9IA* no-in.oa
**««*** H A S T r R BITE ********
M* «**
** ANALYZER CALIBRATION CURVE ANALYSIS t»t
*** M*
t******************************************
OPERATOR COMMENT» EPA-HSA-R23-BLINE
AAAAA
AA AA
AA AA
AA AA
AAAAAAA
AA AA
AA AA
22222
72 22
22
22
22
222 2
2222222
5555555
S3
55
5555D5
55
*" *" 5T*
55555
1
11
1 1
1
EPACYLt
OR
BLNCOD
B16660
146293
B752
B180
133139
33470
B442
H1575
368730
343923
262947
B17780
B23B6
B2211
B1184.
137636
244214
391339
66207
NOTf'fi:
NnTF ft!
VENDOR CYLID
OR
BLENDER RNG
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
CYLINDER NOT
vg rnft MAMrn
VCODE
OR
BLNRT
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
HEASURED
DATA
POINT
TYPES
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAHED
NAMED
NAMED
NAHED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAHED
DEFINED IN THE
rvi «s
INPUTS =-= =
MEAS
DEFL
XH
95.30
79.70
68.60
33.70
43.40
36.90
23.80
19.40
96.50
78.30
68.80
33.60
44.00
37.00
23.00
17.60
4.80
2.90
1.90
EQUIPMENT
f ~-*mtjt:s
NOMINAL
CONC
YM
2.3803
1.9123
1.6013
1.2088
0.9313
0.7991
0.4959
0.4060
2.4120
1.8730
1.6030
1.2060
0.9696
0.8017
0.4812
0.3647
0.0941
0.0606
0.0293
_««»:«.«.»£
ACTIVE
EPS CONC
YE
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tt
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
FILE SYSTEM.
l<; f-t-FUTniiQ rrc rnwr rimcMirTrnt
am**.*-**--**-*-***.^* CURVE COMPARISONS
FIT QUALITY OF NEW CURVE
DEFL CriNC V ZPOINT
XC YC (M-O/C
93.30 2.3805 0.01
79.70 1.9123 0.01
68.60 1.6008 -0.03
53.70 i.2081 -0.06
43.40 0.9527 0.13
36.90 0.7978 -0.16
23.80 0.4995 0.72
19.40 0.4032 -0.69
MEAN OF CABS X) - 0.23
96.50 2.4180 0.23
78.30 1.8723 -0.04
68.80 1.6063 0.08
53.60 1.2036 -0.03
44.00 0.9672 -0.24
37.00 0.8002 -0.19
23.00 0.4819 0.14
17.60 0.3644 0.09
4.80 0.0967 2.69
2.90 0.0382 -4.13
1.90 0.0381 22.47
HCAL*- 1.0000 BCAL* 0.000
CFC-1 ZST»1 UFC*2 DGF*3
NEU.CALIK.NO* 880811-090510
ZNL= 5.909 tINF- 0
SHIFT
DEFL
XS
95.30
79.72
68.49
53.42
43.00
36.42
23.17
18.72
MEAN OF
MS -- 1
m =. = * 3 ;.=--
FROM PREVIOUS
CURVE
CONC Y ZSHIFT
YS* >
11
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
11
1
||
11
.0116 EcS -
CFC-1 ZSTM UFC = 2
PRV.CALIB.NO= 880809-
880809-170322 993 AC-
rrc n/T furrr
0 . 00
0.79
1.24
1.66
1.74
1.63
0.75
-0.00
0.98
tl
tl
tl
11
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
1
-0.905
DGF = 3
165450
TIVE
ti/i -
EQUATIONS AND COEFFICIENTS
**************************
DEGREE FIT
x - (HCAL * x > + RCAL
c M
MCAL -
BCAL -
A3*X 1 A4*X i A;UX i A2*X 4 tii - PCT C02 /N2
C C C C
0.1000000E 01
O.OOOOOOOE 00
Al
A2
A3
A4
A5
O.OOOOOOOE 00
0.1994883E-01
0.4060333E-04
0.1277533E-06
O.OOOOOOOE 00
f
N3
-------
PAGE 2
PROD PROCESSED
Y EQUIPMENT ID
CALIBRATION NAME
CALIBRATION
TEST SITE
CALIB DONE AT
OPERATOR COMMENT
08-11-88
789433
C02A-CR23
880811-091249
A2S1
09105 08-10-88
EPA-HSA-R23-BLINE
******** MASTER SITE ««»***«*
M t*t
* ANALYZER CALIBRATION CURVE ANALYSIS ***
*«* ***
MM***************************************
AAAAA
AA
AA
AA
ft ft
hh
ht\
AAAAAAA
AA
AA
AA
AA
22222
22 22
22
2 2
22
222 2
2222222
5555555
5T.
55
555555
55
55 55
55555
1
11
11
EPACVL*
OR
BLNCOD
368730
343923
262947
B17780
B238A
B2211
B1184
157656
BI6660
146293
B752
B1BO
155139
33470
442
1575
244214
391539
66207
NOTE tit
NOTE »:
VENDOR CYLID
OR
BLENDER RNO
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
1
tl
1
tl
.1
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
CYLINDER NOT
YS FOR NAMED
VCODE
OR
BLNRT
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
DEFINED
CYLS IS
DATA
POINT
TYPES
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
IN THE
HEAS
DEFL
XM
96.50
78.30
68.80
S3. 60
44.00
37.00
23.00
17.60
95.30
79.70
68.60
53.70
43.40
36.90
23.80
19.40
4.80
2.90
1.90
EQUIPMENT
NOMINAL
CONC
YM
2.4120
1.8730
1.6050
1.2060
0.9696
0.8017
0.4812
0.3647
2.3803
1.9123
1.6013
1.2088
0.9515
0.7991
0.4959
0.4060
0.0941
0.0606
0.0295
ACTIVE
F.FS CONC
YE
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
FILE SYSTEM.
PREVIOUS EFS CONC (UNSHIFTED).
FIT DUALITY OF NEU CURVE
HEFL CONC V XPOINT
XC YC (M-O/C
96.50 2.4122 0.01
78.30 1.8714 -0.08
68.80 1.6068 0.11
53.60 1.2068 0.07
44.00 0.9684 -0.13
37.00 0.8011 -0.08
23.00 0.4821 0.19
17.60 0.3644 -0.08
MEAN OF (AftS X) 0.09
95.30 2.3751 -0.22
79.70 1.9114 -0.04
68.60 1.6013 0.00
53.70 1.2094 0.05
43.40 0.9538 0.24
36.90 0.7987 -0.05
23.80 0.4998 0.78
19.40 0.4033 -0.66
4.80 0.0966 2. 57
2.90 0.0581 -4.28
1.90 0.0380 22.35
MCAL* 1.0000 BCAL- 0.000
CFC-1 ZST-1 UFC-2 DOF-3
NEU. CALIB. N0= 880811-091249
XNL" 5.733 tINF- 0
SHIFT
DEFL
XS
96.57
78.21
68.62
53.29
43.61
36.54
22.42
16.97
MEAN OF
FROM PREVIOUS CURVE
CONC
YS*
2.4122
1.8856
1.6244
1.2250
0.9842
0.8139
0.4863
0.3644
(ABS Z> '
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
MS > 1.0088 BS
CFC-1 ZST-1 MFC
Y XSHIFT
(S-O/C
0.00
0.76
1.09
1.51
1.63
1.60
0.87
-0.00
0.93
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tt
tl
tl
= -0.782
"2 DGF-3
PRV. CALIB. N0» 880809-165450
880809-170322 995
Err
AC-TIVE
D/T INEFF D/T -
EQUATIONS AND COEFFICIENTS
ft*************************
X - (MCAL * X ) + BCAL
C H
HCAL - 0.1000000E 01
BCAL - O.OOOOOOOE 00
Mtiuniinu r MC i ui\ ILIUC.
DEGREE FIT
432
AS*X + A4*X + A3»X 4 A2«X + Al = PCT C02 /N2
C C C C
Al = O.OOOOOOOE 00
A2 --' 0.1991130E-01
A3 - 0.4345426E-04
A4 « 0.9S77360E-07
f
u>
-------
EVU1PHENT ID » I
CALIBRATION NAME:
CALIBRATION t
TEST SITE I
CALIB DONE AT t
OPERATOR COMMENT!
789433
C02A-CR23
8BOB16-090155
A251
09S05 08-11-B8
EPA-MSA-R23-UORK
*** *««
*«* ANALYZER CALIBRATION CURVE ANALYSIS »»*
«* ***
***«*****************t*********tt*l*»«*****
mmm, **=**==*=,**-*, KNOWN OR MEASURED INFUTS -=
EFACYL* VENDOR CYLID VCODE DATA ME AS
OR OR OR F01NT DEFL
BLNCOD BLENDER RNG BLNRT TYPES XM
§16660
146293
9752
180
155139
33470
442
B1575
244214
391539
66207
tl
tl
1
1
11
tl
tl
tl
tl
1
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
NAHED
NAMEB
NAHED
95.30
79. BO
68.70
53.80
43.20
36.90
23.70
19.50
4.80
3.00
1.60
NOMINAL ACTIVE
CONC EFS CONC
YM YE
2.3803
1.9123
1.6013
1.2088
0.9S1S
0.7991
0.4959
0.4060
0.0941
0.0606
0.0295
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
11
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
NOTE tl: CYLINDER NOT DEFINED IN THE EQUIPMENT FILE SYSTEM.
NOTE *t YS FOR NAHED CYLS IS PREVIOUS EFS CONC (UNSHIFTF.D) .
AA
AA
AA
AAAtf
AA
AA
flft
it A
AA
*AAA
AA
A A
& ^ *.' *.' £.
72 22
22
22
22
722 2
}} 9 T n O O
or.
00
555555
55
55 55
05555
it
* = = = * = = * = --=.=.--=*--;.- CURVE COM
FIT QUALITY OF NEW CURVE
HEFL CONC V ZFOINT
XC YC (H-O/C
95.30 2.37B8 -0.06
79.80 1.9140 0.09
AS. 70 1.6025 0.07
S3. 80 1.2103 0.12
43.20 0.9479 0.38
36.90 0.7981 -0.13
23.70 0.4978 0.38
19.50 0.4059 -0.02
MEAN OF ( AKS X) 0.16
4.80 0.0969 2.93
3.00 0.0604 -0.38
1.60 0.0321 8.13
MCAL- 1.0000 BCAL- 0.000
CFC«=1 ZST*1 UFC-2 DOF-3
NEU. CALIB. N0= 880B16-0901S5
XNL« 5.890 tINF- 0
FARIPONS = --* = =-- = = = = = = = -- = = = =
SHIFT FROM PREVIOUS CURVE
PFFL CONC Y ZSHIFT
XS YS* (S-O/C
95.44 2.3788 -0.00
79.78 1.9292 0.80
A8.36 1.6226 1.26
53.50 1.2304 1.66
42.79 0.9643 1.73
36.42 0.8110 1.62
23.08 0.5013 0.70
18. B4 0.4059 -0.00
MEAN OF (ABS X) - 0.97
11 H
1 11
1 11
MS « 1.0105 BS - -0.865
CFO1 ZST»1 UFC = 2 DCF-3
PRV. CALIB. N0= 880809-165450
BB0809-170322 995 AC-TIVE
crc II/T twFFr n/i -
EQUATIONS AND COEFFICIENTS
**************************
X = (HCAL * X )
C H
BCAL
A5*X
DEGREE FIT
32
A4*X I A3tX 4 A2*X 4 At - PCT C02 XN2
C C C
: 3
HCAL -
BCAL =
0.1000000E 01
O.OOOOOOOE 00
Al - O.OOOOOOOE 00
A2 '- 0.2000664E-01
A3 * 0.388340SE-04
A4 = 0.1380222E-06
A*; = n. nnnnnnnr nr>
f
-------
PROD PROCESSED
X EQUIPMENT ID
CALIBRATION NAME
CALIBRATION t
TEST SITE
CALIB DONE AT
OPERATOR COMMENT
09108:35 08-16-88
789433
C02A-CR23
880816-090835
A251
09105 OB-12-BB
EPA-MSA-R23-HORK
******** MASTER SITE ********
*** *«*
*** ANALYZER CALIBRATION CURVF ANALYSIS ***
**» **
***********************************M»»****
EPACYLI VENDOR CYLID VCODE DATA MEAS
OR OR OR POINT DFFL
BLNCOD BLENDER RNG Bl.NRT TYFES XH
B16660
144293
B7S2
B180
155139
33470
B442
B1575
244214
391339
66207
«1
1
1
II
11
1
11
11
*!
11
*1
11
1
»1
tl
tl
1
1
1
tl
tl
tl
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
95.30
79. 60
68.50
33.70
43.30
37.20
23.80
19.70
4.90
3.00
1.60
NOMINAL ACTIVE
CQNC EFS FONC
YM YE
2.3803
1.9123
1 .6013
1 . 20PB
0.9513
0.7991
0.4959
0.4060
0.0941
0.0606
0.0293
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
NOTE tl: CYLINDER NOT DEFINED IN THE EQUIPMENT FILE SYSTEM.
NOTE *! YS FOR NAMED CYLS IS PREVIOUS EFS CONC (UNSHIFTED)
AAAAA
AA AA
AA AA
AA AA
AAAAAAA
AA AA
AA AA
22222
?2 22
22
22
22
222 2
2222222
5r.55555
sr. i
55 11
555555
55
55 55
55555 1 1
1
= i.nnvc ui«n
FIT QUALITY OF NFU CURVE
DEFL CONC V ZPOINT
XC YC (M-D/C
95.30 7.3802 -0.00
79.60 1.9128 0.02
68.50 1.6010 -0.02
53.70 1.20B8 -0.00
43.30 0.9489 -0.2B
37.20 0.8024 0.41
23.80 0.4955 -O.OB
19.70 0.4057 -O.OB
MEAN OF ( AtS 7.) = 0.11
4.90 0.0970 2.95
3.00 0.0591 -?.62
1.60 0.0314 5.9R
MCAL* 1.0000 BCAL-- 0.000
CFC=1 2ST=1 MFC = 2 DGF'3
NEU. CALIB. N0= 880814-090835
XNL= 5.871 (INF* 0
r nr\i :>UN3 - = = --- = = _ = = = _s; = ^ = =.
SHIFT FROM PREVIOUS CURVE
PEFL CONC Y ZSHIFT
XS YS* (S-O/C
95.49 2.3802 -0.00
79.37 1.9234 0.56
68.31 1.6161 0.94
53.31 1.2254 1.38
42.76 0.9635 1.55
36.58 0.8144 1.53
22.99 0.4991 0.73
18.83 0.4057 - 0 . 00
MEAN OF (AfcS X) -- 0.83
1 11
tl tl
tl tl
^
MS = 1.0140 «S '- 1.146
CFC=1 ZST-1 MFC=2 HGF=3
PRV.CALIB.NO= 880B09- 165450
8BOB09-170322 995 AC-TIVE
rrr ri/T - -. ikiirrc* n.-T
EQUATIONS AND COEFFICIENTS
**************************
-------
EOUIFHENT Id « :
CALIBRATION NAME I
CALIBRATION * S
TEST SITE :
CALlf DONE AT !
OFERATOR COHHENT:
789433
C02A-CR23
880816-125641
A251
09105 08-16-88
EFA-HSA-R23-UORK
,,,,,,,» n A b I J F. Sill :<<«» M 4
»** Ml
I** ANAIYZER CALIBRATION CURVE AK'AI. i'Mf. It*
IM M»
AAAAA
AA r.fi
AA Afi
AA AA
AAAnAAA
AA AA
AA AA
I I
I I
I II
I
I
I
I I I
rvnuwrf UK
EFACYLt VENDOR CYLID VCODE
OR OR OR
BLNCOd BLENDER RNG BLNRT
BI6660
146293
B732
180
133139
33470
B442
B1375
244214
391339
66207
II
1
1
II
11
1
1
11
II
1
I
It
11
II
II
11
tl
II
II
tl
II
11
ntHbUht 11
DATA
FOINT
TYFES
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
NAHED
NAMED
NAMED
HEAS
DEFL
XH
95.30
79.50
68.60
53.80
43.30
36.90
23.70
19.70
4.90
3.00
1.50
NOMINAL ACTIVE
CONC EFS CONC
YH YE
T.3B03
1.9123
1.6013
1.2088
0.9515
0. 7991
0.4959
0.4060
0.0941
0.0606
O.OH95
II
II
II
II
II
tl
II
II
tl
II
II
NOTE II.' CYLINIiER NOT HEFINEd IN THE EOUIFHENT FHF SYSTEN.
NOTE *: YS FOR NAMED CYLS IS PREVIOUS EFS CONC < UNSHIFTEIi > .
FIT OU.'.I. ITY OF f!F
DEFL COW i
XI. \L
95. 30 ? . 3RO&
79.50 1.9094
68.60 1.6034
53.80 1.2118
43.30 0.9501
36.90 0.7968
23.70 0.4952
19.70 0.4076
HCAN OF 1 ZST = 1 UFC-
c nt\ vt. i un
XFOINT
(M-O/C
0.02
-0. If)
0.13
0.25
-0. 15
-0,29
-0. 14
0.38
0.19
3.71
1.76
0.56
*- 0 . 000
2 DGF'3
NEM.CALIB.NO= BB0816-I25641
XNL» 5.664 IINF
0
< UK i :>ur:s = -.:.-=...-
F.H1FT rkOM FREVIOUS
DEFL CONC V
>: s Y s * <
90.51 2.38&B
79.50 1.V215
68.46 1.6199
53.46 1.2294
42.82 0.9651
36.34 0.8090
?2.97 0.4966
18.91 0.4076
MEAN OF (ABS Z>
i 1
tl
11
MS - 1 .0132 DS =
CFC^-1 ZST = 1 UFC = 2
FRV.CAL IB.NO= BI10B09
880809-170322 9"5 AC
CURVE
Xf-Hlf T
SI --C
0.00
0.63
1.03
1.45
1.58
1 .53
0.69
-0.00
0.87
I 1
II
II
1 .045
DGF=3
165450
IIVE
rtf tul -.- lurrr fi/T
EQUATIONS ANH COEFFICIENTS
ft*************************
X = (HCAL * X ) 4 BCAL
C N
WEIGHTING FACTOR CODE
DEGREE FIT
! 3
432
A5*X » A4*X t A?*X 4 A2»X 4 Al
C C C C
FCT C02 /N2
HCAL
BCAL
0.1900000E 01
O.OOOOOOOE 00
Al
A2
A3
A4
A5
O.OOOOOOOE 00
0. 1970352E-01
0.4860388E-04
0.7125615E-07
O.OOOOOOOE 00
f
-------
PAOE 2
PROD PROCESSED !
X EQUIPMENT I ft » t
CALIBRATION NAME I
CAL1ORATION t I
TEST SITE :
CALIP PONE AT I
OPERATOR COMMENT:
10:29:34 08-17-PP
789433
C02A-CR23
880817-102934
A2S1
OVS05 08-17-88
EFA-MSA-R23-UORK
»MMiti MASTER SITE ********
*t* **
*** ANALYZER CAL I SRAT ION CURVE AK'Al Vf. I G »**
««* ***
**M********lt**** **»»*********«**»*»* <***«
AAAAA
AA AA
AA tth
AA lift
AAAAAAA
AA AA
AA AA
222^2
22 22
22
22
22
222 2
2222222
5555
55
55
5ri'.*0
r- r-
55S
555
05
55
55
55
t
1 1
1 1
EFACYLI VENDOR CYLID
OR OR
RLNCOD PLENDER RNG
016660 II
146293 II
752 It
180 II
155139 II
33470 II
R442 II
RI575 11
244214 II
391539 II
66207 11
NOTE 11 : CYLINDER NOT
Mnrr ft! YR rntt MAitm
*rf un nt
VCODE
OR
fcLNRT
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
ii
11
I
11
DEFINED
rvi c is
DATA
POINT
TYPES
'CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
IN THE
inriila = = ---- = = =. = = = = = = --s. = ^^-- ^^ = s = = = . i,ui\vt nirir nr\ I r*urca =~~=-~=======~- :=:
HEAB NOMINAL ACTIVE FIT OUALITY OF NEU CURVE SHIFT FROM FRFVIUUS CURVE
DEFI CONC EFS CONC DEFL CONC Y ZFOINT DEFL CONC Y ZSHIFT
XM VM YE XC YC - 0.20 HF.AN OF (AHS Z> 1.04
4. BO 0.0941 II 4.80 0.0968 2.83 II II
3.00 0.0606 11 3.00 0.0603 0.4B II II
1.50 0.0295 It 1.50 0.0301 I.BB II II
EQUIPMENT FILE SYSTEM. MCAL- 1.0000 PCAL- 0.000 MS - 1.0120 PS - -0.913
CFC-1 ZST-I MFC«2 DOF-3 CFC=1 ZST=1 MFC=2 DGF=3
NEU.CALIP.NO^ 880817-102934 PRV . CAL I R ,NO^= 880809-165450
ZNL* 5.975 IINF= 0 BPOB09- 1 70322 995 AC- HUE
ic rrQ rnwr MIMCIM rrrro . rrr r./r ikirrr r. / T
EQUATIONS AND COEFFICIENTS
t*************************
X = (MCAL * X ) + HCAL
C M
MCAL * 0.1000000E 01
BCAL - O.OOOOOOOE 00
43
A5*X t A4*X >
C C
Al
A2
A3
A4
AS
HtlUnilNU t «C I UK LUl't
DEGREE FIT
>: I A2»X t Al - PCT C02 /N2
C C
O.OOOOOOOE 00
- 0.199B616E-01
- 0.3860703E-04
> O.I45B367E-06
= O.OOOOOOOC 00
i 3
f
-------
EQUIPMENT ID t I
CALIBRATION NAME I
CALIBRATION t
TEST SITE :
CAL I* DONE AT
789433
C02A-CR23
B80B1B-152I13
A251
09:05 08-18-88
,....,., ,i H 3 I t K b I I t *«**<«»«
*** *M
*M AK-ALY7ER CALI fiRAT ION CURVE ANALYSIS M*
M* ***
«****« *l*O*****»*ttii****M*****t»«l»«Mt*
OFEftATOR COMMENT: EF A-KSA-R23-UORK.
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AAAAAAA
AA
AA
hh
nn
-72
:
~» >
?22
*> ->
22
22
2
-i
.
5
5'
t}'
»-
IJ.'.J*'.»J J
I
11
J.'.1 .J. I .*
I I
EF-ACYLI VENDOR CYLID
OR OR
BLNCOD BLENDER RNG
1-1 6460 ||
146293 II
B752 11
B1BO II
155139 11
33470 II
B442 11
I" 1575 II
244214 ||
391539 11
66207 11
NOTE 11 : CYLINDER NOT
NOTE *: YG Fflk MAMFIi
UN UK MEASURED INF'UTS ---
VCODE DATA HEAS
OR FOINT DEFL
DLNRT TYFES XH
II CURVE 95.30
II CURVE 79.40
ii 'CURVE 48.30
11 CURVE 53.80
II CURVE 43.40
11 CURVE 36.90
II CURVE 23.80
II CURVE 19.50
11 NAMED 4.80
II NAMED 3.00
II NAMED 1.50
--: :- = =:=:s = z = ==-- = = =-:-- = --- = ----''-«= L Uli UE C IINF'flK I BUt.'S --- ^.i.i.i-=..u:
NOMINAL ACTIVF. FIT QUALITY Of NfU CUF.VE fiHIFT » KOM »RIWIOOS U'K'Jf.
CONC ' EFS CONC DEFL fOK'C V XFOINT DEFL CONC Y ZSH1FT
YM YE XT. YC (M-D/r X& YS»
|| 9T..30 2.3014 0.05 95.53 2.3814 -0.00
|| 79.40 1.9128 0.03 79.63 1.9250 0.64
|| 68.30 1.5958 -0.35 68.18 1.6125 1 . OS
II 53.80 1.2125 0.30 53.49 1.2301 1.45
II 43.40 ('.9532 0.1P 42.96 0.9683 1.58
II 36.90 0.7975 O.?0 76.37 0.8097 1.53
II 23. BO 0.49BI 0.43 23.10 0.5017 0.73
II 19.50 0.4038 0.55 18.74 0.403P -0.00
MEAN OF
-------
PROD PROCESSED i
X EQUIPMENT IH I :
CALIBRATION NAME!
CALIBRATION t !
TEST SITE !
CALlf) PONE AT t
OPERATOR COMMENT:
10:29:59 oa-24 RB
789433
C02A-CR23
BB0824-102859
A251
09:05 08-24-BB
EPA-HSA-R23-UORK
MASTER SITE «**«****
»* *«*
M* ANALYZER CALIBRATION CURVE ANALYSIS tit
**« ***
M************MM»*»*************» *«$«*»*<
AAAAA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
h A
AAAAAAA
AA
AA
M\
A A
22
22
2
222
f.tL.
222
-> ->
*. 4-
22
2
-»
2??2
or.
55
5 5
:.5
.1
:»r,r.5
55
55
T» '» 'i 5
EPACYLI
OR
BLNCOD
B16660
146293
B752
B1BO
155139
33470
B442
B1575
244214
391539
66207
NOTE 11 :
un T r. *
vunuu nc* MCACitC'CFi
= KNUWN OK ncA5UKtl<
VENDOR CYL1P VCODE DATA
OR
BLENDER RNG
tl
tl
tl
tl
11
tl
II
11
11
tl
tl
CYLINDER NOT
vc rnc- UAMrr.
OR
fcLNRT
11
tl
tl
tl
tl
II
11
II
11
ti
11
DEFINED
r vi c ic
POINT
TYPES
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
IN THE
i ur-iiT c - - -
1 nr l> 1 D
MEAS
DEFL
XK
95.30
79.80
68.50
53.70
43.30
36.90
23.70
19.50
4.80
3. 10
1 .50
EQUIPMENT
NOMINAL
CONC
YM
?.3803
1.9123
1 .6013
1 .2088
0.9515
0.7991
0.4959
0. 4060
0.0941
0.0606
0.0295
«. _ . .-- - ... - PiiC-MC' mur- AC- t e nuc
ACTIVE
EFS CONC
YE
11
11
tl
tl
tl
II
II
II
It
tl
11
FILE SYSTEM.
c-c-nirnitc ETC rnur / IIMCU t rtr n i
FIT QUALITY OF NFU CURVE
DEFL COHr Y ZPOINT
xr. YC (M-D/r
95.30 2.3789 -0.06
79.80 1.9 1 58 0.1B
68.50 1.5991 -0.14
53.70 1.2092 0.03
43.30 0.9511 O.OT.
36. 9O 0 . 7984 0. 09
23.70 0.4974 0.29
19.50 0. 4053 -0.16
MEAN OF ( AhS /.} - 0.13
4.80 0.0966 2.56
3.10 0.0621 2.48
1 .50 0.0300 1 .55
MCAL- 1.0000 BCAL= 0.000
CFC=1 ZST=1 UFC=2 DGF=3
NEIJ.CALIB.KO= 880824- 102B59
ZNL= 5.628 tINF= 0
_ _ . ._
SHIFT
DEFL
XS
95.44
79. 78
68.35
03.39
42. 88
36.40
23.06
18.81
ML AH OF
MS = 1
CFC = 1
FROM PREVIOUr
CONC Y
YS* (
2.3789
1 .9292
1.6171
1 .2275
0.9663
O.BI06
0.5008
0.4053
(Af«S '/.)
11
II
11
.0110 BS =
ZSf=l UFC=2
PRV.CALIB.NO= 880809
BB0809-
crc
1703?2 995 AC
ri/T lurr
CURVE
2SHIFT
s-r >/c
-o.oo
0.70
1.12
1 .52
1.61
1 .53
0.68
-0.00
0. B9
11
II
tl
-0.899
DGF = 3
- 165450
-1IVE
EQUATIONS AND COEFFICIENTS
*«*****$******************
X =
-------
EQUIF-HENT Id i
CALIBRATION NAME!
CALIBRATION t !
TEST SITE :
CALI* DONE AT t
OPERATOR COMMENT:
*w**j**i.l V O .. O IIU
789433
C02A-CR23
680826-105111
A2S1
09:05 08-25-88
EFA-MSA-R23-UORK
««,««*** H A S I E R Rift ********
*** ««*
»t* ANALYZER CALIBRATION CURVE ANALYSIS *«*
*** ***
***************t******************»**4*«*«*
AAAliA
AA AA
AA AA
AA AA
AAAAAAA
AA AA
A A AM
22222
22 22
22
22
22
222 2
2 2 2 2 r 2 2
555
55
55
55':.
5 5
":J
5555
'.I'.i'.-
55
55
555
1
1 1
1 1
=========
EFACYLI
OR
BLNCOD
B16660
146293
B752
B1BO
155139
33470
B442
B1575
244214
391539
66207
NOTE 11!
NflTF *!
= = = = = = = = = KNOWN OR MEASUKEII
VENDOR CYLID
OR
BLENDER RNG
t,
11
II
II
II
11
II
II
11
11
11
CYLINDER NOT
Y<; rnt KIAHFII
VCODE
OR
BLNRT
11
II
11
11
11
11
II
11
II
II
II
DEFINED
r v i r- TC
DATA
POINT
TYPES
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
IN THE
INPUTS ---
HEAS
DEFL
XM
95.30
79.60
68.50
53.70
43.30
36.90
23.60
19.40
4. BO
3.00
1 .40
EQUIFMENT
NOMINAL ACT
CONC EFS
IVE
CONC
YM. YE
2.3803
1.9123
1.6013
1.2068
0.9515
0.7991
0.4959
0. 4060
0.0941
0.0606
0.0295
FILE SYSTEM.
11
II
II
1
11
II
1
11
II
II
II
c-&r ii i mic rcc rnur / IIMCUTF TFTI » .
FIT QUALITY OF NEW CURVE
DEFL CONC ^
XT YC
95.30 2.3816
79.60 1.9110
68.50 1.5996
53.70 1.2099
43.30 0.9522
36.90 0.79V7
23.60 0.4967
19.40 0.4046
MEAN OF ( AfcS '/. ) -
4. BO 0.0972
3.00 0.0405
1.40 0.02BI
MCAL- 1 .0000 BCAL
CFC=I ZST=1 UFC=
NEW.CALIB.NQ^ B80B2
ZNL = 5.055 IINF
7.FOINT
(M-D/r
0.05
-0.07
-0. 10
0.09
0.07
0.07
0. 15
0.34
0.12
3.15
-0.15
-4.80
= 0.000
2 DGF-3
6-1051 1 1
0
SHIFT FROM PREVIOUS
DEFL CONC Y
XS YS* (
95.53 ?.3816
79.66 1.9259
68.43 1.6193
53.47 1.2295
42.95 0.968?
36. 48 0.8123
23.03 0.5001
IB. 78 0.4046
KF.AN OF 4 BCAL
C M
MCAL =
KCAL =
0.1000000E 01
O.OOOOOOOE 00
432
A5*X 4 A4*X I A3*X
C C C
Al
A2 =
A3 =
A4
AS =
DECREE FIT
» A2*X I Al = FCT C02 /N?
C
O.OOOOOOOE 00
0.2005121E-01
0.3B90154E-04
0. 1356052E-06
O.OOOOOOOE 00
-------
PROCESSED !
EQUIPMENT HI I I
CALIBRATION NAHE:
CALIBRATION I !
TEST 5ITC :
CALIfi HONE AT !
09!I8:27 09-01-8B
789433
C02A-CR23
8B0901-091B27
A251
09:05 08-3I-B8
«**(»*<*
MASTER
SITE
*«M**<*
*«* »**
*t* AK'ALYZER CAL1PRAT10N CURVE fiNrtLVSIf. 4M
»** M*
MM*********************** *M***l*»*t**M*
OPERATOR COMMENT ! EPA-MSA-R23-UORK
EFACYLI I
OR
PLNCOti
616660
146293
6752
P1BO
155139
33470
M42
PI575
244214
391539
66207
=========
VENDOR CYL
OR
((LENDER RN
11
11
11
11
1
11
11
It
11
11
11
\NUUK UK
Hi VCOHE
OR
3 PLNRT
11
II
1
11
11
11
1 1
II
11
II
11
HI AbUKtU
HAT A
POINT
TYPES
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
NAMEH
NAMEH
NAMEH
Mru i b - =
HE AS
HFFL
XM
9T..30
79.70
6P.50
53.80
43.40
37.00
23.80
1 9 . r,0
0.10
2.90
1 .90
NOMINAL
CONC E
YM
2.3803
1 .9123
1 .6013
1 . 20P8
0.9515
0.7991
0.4959
0.4060
0.0941
0.0606
0.0295
ACTIVE
FB CONC
YE
II
II
II
II
II
11
II
11
11
11
1
NOTE II! CYLINDER NOT HEFINEH IN THE EOUIFMENT FILE SYSTEM.
NOTE *! YS FOR NAME I' CYIS IS PREVIOUS EFS CONC (IJMSHIF TEIO .
AAAAA
AA
AA
AA
l\l\
l\l\
(\<\
22222
22 22
22
2 2
oor;
sr.
or.
% 7' T i
AAAAAhA 22
AA
AA
/i ft
h rt
722
2222:??
:.'j
V..
FIT
i, i j rvv c. i i rt
DUALITY OF NEU CURVE
HEFL
XC
95.
79.
68.
53.
43.
37.
23.
19.
MEAN
j *
2 .
1 .
MCAL =
CFC=1
30
70
50
80
40
00
no
r.o
OF
10
90
90
1 .
1
NEU.CALI
2NL =
5
CONC ^
2
1
1
1
0
0
(1
(1
( rt i< r,
v,
0
0
0000
ST = 1
P. NO
.?31
YC
.3P07
.9131
.5984
.2103
.9518
. 7989
. 1980
.4040
i,
. 1.02 2
. 007P
.0378
PCAL
UFC^
ZFOINT
(M-O/C
0.02
0.04
0 . 1 8
0.12
0.03
-0.0?
0. 41
0.00
0.17
7 . 9f.
4 . 77
21 .98
_ _
0 . 000
2 »GF=3
- eeo9oi-o9ie?7
IlK'F
0
r MI\ i DUrf 3
PHIFT
HEFL
XS
95.50
79.71
68.37
53.48
42.95
16.47
23.11
IB. 70
MEAN OF
MS = 1
FROM
PREVIOUS
CURVE
CONC V ZPHIFT
YS» (S-D/C
2
\
1
1
0
0
0
0
< AhS
. 01?0
CFC=I ZST^l
PRV.CAl
880809-
err
I P. NO
.3807
.9273
.6175
.2299
.9682
.8122
.5010
.4040
'i )
1 1
11
II
FiS -
MFC -2
= 880609
170322 995 AC-
fi.-T T»ifrr-
0.00
0.74
1 .20
1 .62
1 . 73
1 .66
0. 76
0.00
0 . 96
1 1
1 1
II
-0.9V..1
DGF = 3
160450
1 IVE
fi 1
«NU LUtC»- ILltNl b
****************>*********
X = (MCAL * X > + PCAL
C H
HEGREF FIT
432
A5*X + A4*X 4 A3*X 4 A2*X I <\\ FCT C02 /N
C C C C
MCAL =
BCAL =
0.1000000E 01
O.OOOOOOOE 00
Al
A2
A3
A4
A5
O.OOOOOOOE 00
0.19815B3E-01
0.4411709E-04
0.105800BE-06
O.OOOOOOOE 00
-------
PAGE 2
PROD PROCESSED !
X EQUIPMENT III I I
CALIBRATION NAME:
CALIBRATION !
TEST SITE t
CALIU DONE AT t
UF-EKATOK COMMENT:
09106:07 09-02-88
769433
C02A-CR23
BB0902-090607
A2SI
09!OS O9-01-B9
EPA-MSA-R23-SEC
******** MASTER SITE MltiM*
*** »*
*** ANALYZFR CALIBRATION CURVE AKftLYHIS <»»
*** **
**********t****»***********»***r*ft«********
-««. = .:=,= = = = ==: = = = = - KNOUN OR
EPACYLI VENDOR CYLID VCODE
OR OR OR
BLNCOD BLENDER RNG BLNRT
N36920
343923
262947
B177B
B2386
B2211
B1I84
157656
I" 16660
146293
8752
HBO
153139
6442
B1375
244214
391S39
66207
1
11
11
II
11
11
11
»1
11
II
11
1
11
11
1
11
11
11
It
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
II
1
II
11
MEASURED
DATA
POINT
TYPES
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
INPUT? - =
tiEAS
DEFL
XM
95. BO
7B.20
6B.70
53.60
44. 10
37.10
23.00
17.60
95.30
79.00
68.20
53.70
43.30
23.70
19.40
4.70
2. BO
1 .20
NOMINAL ACTIVE
CONC EFS CONC
YM YE
2.3950
1.8730
1.6050
1 .2060
0.9696
O.B017
0.4BI2
0.3647
2.3B03
1 .9123
1 .6013
I .2068
0.9515
0.4959
0.4060
0.0941
0.0606
0.0295
11
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
11
II
11
II
II
11
II
II
11
II
NOTE »i: CYLINDER NOT DEFINED IN THE EOUIPMENT FILE SYSTEM.
NOTE *! YS FOR NAMED CYLS IS PREVIOUS EFS f f'NC (UNSHIFTED).
AAAAA
AA
AA
AA
it ft
(,h
h A
72222
~* 2 22
22
22
AAAAAAA ?2
AA
AA
AA
AA
??2 2
!? 2 2 1' ? ? 2
11111
FIT QUALITY OF NEW CURVE
DEFL rUNC V
ZFOINT
XC YC
-------
PROD PROCESSED
Y tQtIIPHENT ID «
CALIBRATION NAME
CALIBRATION t
TEST SITE
CALIB DONE AT
OPERATOR COMMENT
10124151 08-11-88 *«*««*** N ASTER SITE *****»«*
789463
C02A-CR22
880B11-1024SI
A2S1
14112 08-10-88
EPA-HOR-R22-BLINE
tt* ***
*« ANALYZER CALIBRATION CURVE ANALYSIS It*
** ***
(ft*************************t*t*»l*M*******
*»»»-« = = = = = = KNUHN UK nt«J»UKtU INKUIb »^=-
EPACYL* VENDOR CYLID VCODE DATA NEAB
OR OR OR POINT DEFL
BLNCOD BLENDER RNG BI.NRT TYPES XN
B23B6
B2211
B14S4
A-221
B1184
157656
286591
065369
155139
33470
163287
B1103
B442
B1S75
B916
337743
244214
391339
66207
*1
1
1
1
tl
tl
tt
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tt
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
NAMED
NAKED
NAHED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAHED
NAHED
NAMED
97.00
81.70
74.40
61.40
50.80
39.00
27.60
14.00
95.40
81.30
71.40
62.00
32.30
43.20
2S.40
IS. 30
10.60
6.60
3.20
NOMINAL ACTIVE
CONC EFS CONC
YM YE
0.9696
0.8017
0.7260
0.3900
0.4812
0.3647
0.2330
0.1282
0.9515
0.7991
0.6923
0.3947
0.4939
0.4060
0.2344
0.1396
0.0941
0.0606
0.0293
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tt
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
NOTK#*1! CYLINDER NOT DEFINED IN THE EQUIPMENT FILE SYSTEM.
NOTE t4: NO PREVIOUS ANALYZER CALIBRATION ON FILE IN THE EFS.
NOTE *! YB FOR NAMED CYLS IS PREVIOUS EFS CONC (UNSHIFTED).
AAAAA
AA hh
AA fiA
AA AA
AAAAAAA
AA hh
AA AA
22222
22 22
22
22
22
722 2
2222222
5r»r«
53
55
5555
1
11
550555
55
55
55
55
555 11
- = = * = = = -------=---- 1 (IKVt UlirirAKlbUNb
FIT QUALITY OF NtU CURVE
DEFL CONC Y XPPINT
XC YC 1.0000 BCAL" 0.000
CFC-I ZST*1 MFC-2 DGF-3
NEW.CALIB.NO= 680811-102451
XNL- 2.776 tINF> 0
SHIFT
DEFL
XS
14
4
t4
*4
4
t4
t4
14
HS *
CFC«
^ -
=. ssau* E _
FROM PREVIOUS CURVE
CONC V
YS»
»4
t4
t4
14
14
14
4
14
1
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
II
11
11
tl
BS -
ZST= WFC-
XSHIFT
(S-O/C
14
14
t4
14
t4
14
14
14
II
tl
tl
1
tl
tt
11
tl
tl
tl
II
DGF =
PRV.CALIB.NO=
EQUATIONS AND COEFFICIENTS
ft************************
X (MCAL * X ) t BCAL
C M
A5»X
NCAL
BCAL
0.1000000E 01
O.OOOOOOOE 00
A4«X
A3*X
A2»X
WEIGHTING FACTOR CODE
DEGREE FIT
Al = PCT C02 /N2
: 2
: 3
Al O.OOOOOOOE 00
A2 - O.B994130E-02
A3 = O.B922260E-05
A4 - 0.1478682E-07
AS * O.OOOOOOOE 00
-------
PAGE 2
PROD F-ROCESSEIi !
Y EQUIPMENT ID I I
CALIBRATION NAME 5
CALIBRATION t
TEST SITE :
CALIB DONE AT ;
OPERATOR COMMENT:
10:32:39 08-11-88
789463
C02A-CR22
880811-103239
A251
******** HASTE R SITE Ml*****
*t* «*«
*** ANALYZER CALIBRATION CURVE ANALYSIS »**
*** **«
*********«»******4t**************«:*********
EPA-HOR-R22-BLINE
AAAAA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA «H
AAAAAAA
AA
AA
AA
AA
22222
22 22
22
22
222 2
2222222
5 5 5 5 5 0 0
53
or.
55
55
55
05555
I
I 1
11
= , = = = = = = = = = = , = = = = = = KNOWN OR MEASURED INPUTS = = ~.; = t = = = .> = = = .;" = ^ = -
EPACYLt
OR
BLNCOD
155139
33470
163287
B1103
B442
B1575
B916
337743
B2386
B2211
B14S4
A-221
B11B4
157656
286591
065369
244214
391539
66207
NOTE' tii
NOTE »4!
MflTF t!
VENDOR CYLID
OR
BLENDER RNG
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
*1
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
CYLINDER NOT
NO PREVIOUS
YR FOP MAMFTl
VCODE DATA MEAS
OR POINT TIEFL
BLNRT TYPES XM
tl CURVE 95.40
tl CURVE 81.50
tl CURVE 71.40
tl CURVE 62.00
tl CURVE 52.30
tl CURVE 43.20
tl CURVE 25.40
tl CURVE 15.30
tl NAMED 97.00
tl NAMED 81.70
tl NAMED 74.40
tl NAMED 61.40
tl NAMED 50.80
tl NAMED 39.00
tl NAMED 27.60
1 NAMED 14.00
11 NAMED 10.60
*1 NAMED 6.60
tl NAMED 3.20
DEFINED IN THE EQUIPMENT
NOMINAL
CONC
YM
0.9515
0.7991
0.6925
0.5947
0.4959
0.4060
0.2344
0.1396
0.9696
0.8017
0.7260
0.5900
0.4812
0.3647
0.2550
0.1282
0.0941
0.0606
0.0295
ACTIVE
EFS CONC
YE
tl
tl
tl
11
tl
tl
tl
11
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
FILE SYSTEM.
ANALYZER CALIBRATION ON FILE IN THE EFS.
PYI Q 1 Q c-t-r til mic rrc rnur i iiucuirir n v
Uti-S.XSS =
=-=-^-=-*-=
CURVE COMPARISONS
FIT QUALITY OF NEW CURVE
DEFL
XC
95.40
81.50
71.40
62.00
52.30
43.20
25.40
15.30
MEAN OF
97.00
81.70
74.40
61.40
50.80
39.00
27.60
14.00
10.60
6.60
3.20
MCAL' 1 .
CONC Y ZPOINT
YC
0.9514
0.7994
0.6922
0.5946
0.4962
0.4059
0.2343
0. 1397
-------
PAGE 2
FROD PROCESSED !
Y EQUIPMENT ID t I
CALIBRATION NAME
CALIBRATION
TEST SITE
CALIB DONE AT
OPERATOR CONHENT
13:4 = 0.06 MFAN OF (AbS *> 0.63
2.3803 tl 95.40 2.3779 -0.10 tl tl
1.9120 tl 79.50 i.9112 -0.04 tl tl
1.6013 tl 68.30 1.6000 -O.OR tl
I.20B8 tl 33.40 1.2079 -0.07 tl
0.9315 tl 43.00 0.9488 -0.28 tl
0.7991 tl 36.70 0.7976 -0.19 tl
0.4939 tl 23.50 0.4945 -0.28 tl
0.4060 tl 19.40 0.4041 -0.47 tl
0.0941 tl 4.70 0.0944 0.7B tl
0.0606 tl 2.90 0.0580 -4. 55 tl
0.0295 tl 1.40 0.0279 -5.P3 II
FILE SYSTEM. MCAL- 1.0000 FfCAL- 0.000 MS = 1.0081 hS = -0.744
CFC=I ZST-1 UFC = 2 DGF = 3 CFOI ZST = 1 WFC = ? DGF = 3
NEW. CALIB. N0= 880010-134426 F'RV . C AL I f . N0= 880809- 1 65450
XNL= 5.451 tINF = 0 880809-170322 995 AC-TIVE
rvi Q 1C PK-riJi mm rrc rnur / nucuir rr n » _ rrc t, 1 1 lucrr t. it
EQUATIONS AND COEFFICIENTS
t*************************
X = (MCAL « X ) + BCAL
C M
MCAL - 0.1000000E 01
BCAL " O.OOOOOOOE 00
DEGREE FIT
432
A5*X + A4*X t A3*X + A2»X + Al - PCT C02 /N2
C C C C
Al O.OOOOOOOE 00
A2 - 0.19B3948E-01
A3 = O.SOSOB39E-04
A4 = 0.2934626E-07
A3 * O.OOOOOOOE 00
: 3
-------
PROD PROCESSED :
X EQUIPMENT ID I
CALIBRATION NAMEt
CALIBRATION t
TEST SITE :
CALIB DONE AT I
GrtKAlUK COMMENT>
08:41:46 08-16-88
789433
C02A-CR23
8B08I6-OB414A
A2S1
09103 08-M-nn
EfA-HOR-R23-UORK
******** M A S T F R SITE ***»«»*«
» M*
** ANALYZER CALIBRATION CURVE ANALYSIS ***
*** ***
*****t»tttt**»**************t*l»»t»****»»tt
==========
EFACYLI
OR
RLNCOD
B16660
146293
*732
B1BO
155139
33470
B442
B1375
244214
39133?
44207
= = C = == = = =
VENDOR CYL
OR
&LENHER RN
11
1
1
1
1
tl
1
1
1
I
1
KNOWN OR
IB WCOOE
OR
3 Bl NRT
1
1
tl
1
1
1
11
1
1
1
11
MEASURED
BAT A
JOINT
TVFES
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
NAHEB
NAMED
NAMED
INPUTS ==
MEAS
PEFL
XM
93.40
7?. 30
68.30
S3. SO
43.00
34.70
23.30
19. SO
4.80
3.00
1.30
= = = =: = = = £»£.
NOMINAL
CONC E
YM
2.3803
1.9120
1.4013
1.2088
0.9315
0.7991
0.4939
0.4040
0.0941
0.0404
0.0293
i; ;_- 3 i= : . s_ » =
ACTIVE
FS CONC
YE
tl
tl
tl
tl
tt
tl
II
tl
tl
1
tl
NOTE tl: CYLINDER NOT DEFINED IN THE EQUIPMENT FILE SYSTEM.
NOTE IS YS FOR NAMED CYLS IS PREVIOUS EFS CONC (UNSHIFTFD).
AAAAA
AA AA
AA AA
AA AA
AAAAAAA
AA ltd
AA A*
22222
?2 22
22
222 1'
2222222
Tt j 5 j lj
1
II
11 1
FIT QUALITV OF HFM CURVE
BEFL CONC Y ZPOINT
XC YC (M-O/C
9S.40 2.3800 0.01
79.50 1.9123 0.02
48.30 1.6008 -0.03
33.30 1.2112 0.20
43.00 0.9494 0.20
36.70 0.79B4 -0.08
23.30 0.49:13 0.12
19. SO 0.4071 0.26
MEAN OF (AfcS Z) 0.11
4.00 0.0967 2.67
3.00 0.0402 -0.73
l.SO 0.0300 1.37
MCAL- 1.0000 BCAL*- 0.000
CFC-I ZST-1 MFC' 2 DOF<-3
NEU. CALIB. NO* BB0816-084146
XNL- 3.446 tINF* 0
SHIFT FROM PREVIOUS CURVE
nFFL CONC Y ZSHIFT
XS YS» (S-O/C
93.48 2.3800 0.00
79.44 1.9197 0.39
68.13 1.6113 0.63
33.20 1.2227 0.93
42.60 0.959P 1.06
36.23 0.8068 1.03
22.93 0.4978 0.49
18.89 0.4071 -0.00
MEAN OF (ABS Z> 0.57
tl tl
tl tl
11 tl
HS = 1.0091 BS - -0.785
CFC-1 ZST»1 yFC^2 BGF-3
FRV.CALIB.NO^ BBOB09- 163430
B80B09-170322 993 AC-TIVE
rrr it/i lurrr ti/l -
EQUATIONS AND COEFFICIENTS
******»**»**«***»****«
X * (MCAL * X ) + BCAL
C M
MCAL - 0.1000000E 01
BCAL O.OOOOOOOE 00
WEIGHTING FACTOR CODE I 2
DEGREE FIT : 3
432
A5»X 4 A4*X I A3*X t A2*X
C C C C
Al - FCT C02 /N2
Al
A2
A3
A4
A3
O.OOOOOOOE 00
0.1990647E-01
0.4886634E-04
0.4164999E-07
O.OOOOOOOE 00
f
-------
r»
IT
QfcBBED
FHCNT ID
MAT I ON NAHEI
IkAllON
TCIT SITE
CAL1B DONE AT
OPERATOR CONNENT
08130(23 08-14-88
7B9433
C02A-CR23
880814-083023
A2S1
09103 08-12-88
EPA-HOR-R23-MORK
MM*»l« MASTER BITE t*«t«M»
* M*
M* ANALT7ER CALIBRATION CURVE ANALYSIS **«
*«*
****«**«*«*** t**t*M**»*******t**<*r*
AAAAA
AA AA
AA AA
AA AA
AAAAAAA
AA AA
AA AA
22222 5555555
22 22 S3 I
22 35 11
22 555r>r.S
22 55
222 2 53 r>r.
2222222 r>S553 11
EPACYL*
OR
»LNCOD
14440
144293
732
180
133139
33470
442
1375
244214
391539
44207
NOTE «i:
un-rr <
VENDOR CYLID
OR
BLENDER RNO
1
tl
11
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
11
CYLINDER NOT
vc me UAMrn
VRODE
OR
BLNRT
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
tl
1
tl
tl
DEFINED
rvi c f c
DATA
POINT
TYPES
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
NAHKB
NAMED
NAMED
IN THE
MEAS
DEFL
XM
95.40
79.50
48.30
33.40
43.00
34.40
23.30
19.40
4.80
3.00
1 .50
EQUIPMENT
NOMINAL
CONC
YM
7. 3803
1.9120
1.4013
1.2088
0.9315
0.7991
0.4939
0.4040
0.0941
0.0404
0.0295
ACTIVE
EF8 CONC
YE
tt
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
FILE SYSTEM.
r-cTiMmic rrc rnur t iiMcuirtr n \ . i
FIT DUALITY OF NEW CURVE
DEFL CONC Y XfOINT
XC YC .NO= BB0809-l«r<450
880809-170322 995 AC-TIVE
OPERATOR COMMENT I I
EQUATIONS AND COEFFICIENTS.
I*************************
X - (HCAL « X ) t BCAL
C H
MCAL » 0.1000000E 01
BCAL » O.OOOOOOOE 00
-MOKK
UEIOHTINO FACTOR CODE I 2
DEGREE FIT J 3
43
A5*X * A4»X
C C
A3tX » A2*X t Al
C C
PCT C02 /N2
Ai * O.OOOOOOOE 00
A2 0.2000404E-01
A3 0.4485111E-04
A4 - 0.5144974E-07
A3 O.OOOOOOOE 00
-------
PROD PROCESSED I
X EQUIPMENT Id » !
CALIBRATION NAME:
CALIBRATION :
TEST SITE :
CALI« DONE AT 5
OPERATOR COMMENT:
H.':44:iO 08-16-88
789433
C02A-CR23
BBOB16-124410
A2S1
09:05 08-16-88
**»*»*»* MASTER SITE «»*««<**
*** »*«
*** ANALYZER CALIBRATION CURVE ANALYSIS M»
**» *M
M*4M»»****M»*t*****»*»»M****l*»l
VENDOR CYLID VCODE DATA
OR
hLENt'ER RNG
11
11
11
II
II
11
11
II
11
1
II
CYLINDER NOT
YS FOR NAME [1
OR
*LNRT
|t
11
11
II
II
11
II
11
11
1
1
DEFINED
CYI S 15
POINT
TYPES
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
IN THE
1 NT II 1 b - = -
MEAS
DFFL
XH
95.40
79.50
68.30
53.50
43.00
36.70
23.50
19.50
4.80
3.00
1.50
EQUIPMENT
NOMINAL
CONC
YM
2.3803
1 .9120
1.6013
1.208B
0.9515
0.7991
0.49S9
0.4060
0.0941
0.0606
0.029S
ACTIVF
EFS fONC
YE
11
II
II
I
II
1
11
11
1
II
II
FILE SYSTEM.
FK-Fuinn^ FFC rnwr < nuQuirTrni
FIT DUALITY OF NFU
DEFL CONC Y
ilhvt LUfl
CURVE
2POINT
XC YC (M-O/C
95.40 2.3800
79.50 1.9123
66.30 1.6008
53.50 1.2112
43.00 0.9496
36.70 0.7984
23.50 0.4953
19.50 0.4071
MEAN OF (AdS Z)
4. BO 0.0967
3.00 0.0602
1.50 0.0300
MCAL- 1.0000 BCAL-
CFC'l 7.ST-1 UFC-2
-0.01
0.02
-0.03
0.20
-0.20
-0.08
0. 12
0.26
0.11
2.67
-0.73
1 .57
0.000
DGF-3
NEU.CALIB.NO- 880B1 6- 1 244 1 0
ZNL' 5.466 IINF*
0
r«KlMlf!3 =- = = = - =
SHIFT FROM PREVIOUS
CURVE
HEFL CONC Y ZSHIF1
XS YS»
-------
FACE 2
FROD F'ROCESSED
X EQUIPMENT ID I
CALIBRATION NAME
CALIBRATION
TEST SUE
CALIP DONE AT
OPERATOR COMMENT
10:16!13 OB-17-PB
789433
CD2A-CR23
680817-101613
A251
09:05 08-17-88
EF-A-HOR-R23-UORKE
«« * 4 * 4 4 4 MASTER SITE 4444*44*
»«* ««4
*«» ANALY7ER CALI6RATION CURVE ANALYSIS 4»«
Mt »*«
M***4444t4*444444t**4***4**»*4t4M«4Mt*M
AAAAA
AA AA
AA AA
AA AA
AAAAAAA
AA AA
AA AA
22
2 2 2 - 1.' i' 2
1
11
11 I
- = = = = = = = = = _ = rvnuwN UK ntHbUhti' inruia - = - = - = = ------s- = -
EF'ACYLI VENDOR CTLID VCODE DATA HEAS NOMINAL ACTIVE
OR OR OR POINT DEFl CONC EFS CONC
DLNCOD BLENDER RNG DLNRT TYFES XH YM YE
616660 11 tl "CURVE 95.10 2.3B03 II
I4A293 II 11 CURVE 79.40 1.9120 11
6732 11 11 CURVE 68.30 1.6013 11
6180 11 II CURVE 03.40 1.2088 11
155139 II 11 CURVE 43.00 0.9S1S 11
33470 II 11 CURVE 36. /-O 0.7991 11
B442 11 11 CURVE 23.00 0.4959 11
61575 11 11 CURVE 19.40 0.4060 II
244214 It 11 NAMED 4.80 0.0941 11
391539 11 11 NAMED 3.00 0.0606 II
66207 11 11 NAMED 1.50 0.0295 11
NOTE 11 : CYLINDER NOT DEFINED IN THE EQUIF'HENT FILE SYSTEM.
unTr * vc rnfe UAMrn rvi c tc nc-rmniic rrc rnur < iiucuicTrn t
;- = uurvvt i uri
FIT nUALHY OF NEW CURVE
DEFI r.ONC \ XFOINT
xr YC (M-r>/r.
95.40 ?.3B07 0.02
79.40 i .7106 -O.OP
68.30 I.*02I 0.05
53.40 1 .2102 0.12
43.00 f. .9? 12 -0.03
3A.60 0.7976 -0.19
23.50 0.4966 0.13
19.40 0.4060 -0.00
MEAN OF (Ah? '/.) 0.08
4.80 0.0970 3.02
3.00 0.0604 0.36
1.50 0.0.101 1.94
HCAL- 1.0000 HCAL- 0.000
CFC-I ZST^l WFC=2 DCF=3
NEU.CALI6.NO- 880BI7-I01613
XNL= 5.415 IINF= 0
r(ll«i: 0.55
II II
II II
II II
MS = 1.0087 6S - -0.725
CFC=1 ZST=1 MFC=2 DGF=3
FRV.CAl I6.NO= 8B0809-165450
BB0809- 170322 995 AC-TIVE
EQUATIONS AND COEFFICIENTS
**************************
X = (MCAL * X ) + 6CAL
C M
MCAL
BCAL
0.1000000E 01
O.OOOOOOOE 00
DEGREE FIT
432
A5*X + A4*X I A3*X I A2*X f Al '- FCT C02 /N2
C C C C
Al - O.OOOOOOOE 00
A2 - 0.1V98405E--01
A3 = 0.4770664E-04
A4 = 0.4607861E--07
AS = O.OOOOOOOE 00
v£>
-------
FROD PROCESSED
X EQUIPMENT Hi 1
CALIBRATION NAME
CALIBRATION *
TEST SITE
CALI* PONE AT
OPEKATCR CCinHENT
= =: = = = = =: = =
EPACYLI
OR
BLNCOD
B16660
146293
B752
B1BO
155139
33470
M42
H575
244214
391539
66207
7894.^3
C02A-CR
BBOFUB-
A251
09:05
tF A-HOR
1 08-18-BP 44*»44 4.4 M
M*
23 M* AIIALY7ER
151221 M*
08-18-88
-R23-UORKE
= - = = = =:= = = = KNOUN OF* MEASURED
VENDOR CYLID VCODE DATA
OR
FLENDER RNO
11
11
11
II
II
11
II
II
II
II
11
OR
DLNRT
11
II
II
II
11
II
11
11
11
11
11
POINT
TYPES
CURVE
'CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
[ Nf 'UT S -
liEAS
DFFl
>:n
9T..40
79.50
6B.20
53.40
43.00
36.70
23.60
19.50
4.00
3.00
1 .60
NOMINAI
CONC
YM
2.3803
1 .9120
1 .6013
1 .2086
0.9515
0.7991
0. 4959
0. 4060
0.0941
0.0606
0.0295
A S T F F,
CAI. IfiRATIC
ACT IVF
EFS rONC
YE
11
11
11
II
11
II
II
II
II
II
II
S I I I
*« 4 « 4 4 t«
4**
ANALYSIS 4*»
444
NOTE II.' CYLINDER NOT DEFINE!' IN THE EOUIFMENT FILE SYSTEM.
NOTE *: YS FOR NAME!" CYLf, IS PREVIOUS EFS CONC (UNSHIF TEH) .
AAAAA
A A A/.
AA fiA
AA /i A
AAAAAAA
AA AA
AA AA
I I
FIT nu.u i iv or Nf u
DFFI r.ONf. Y
I." r\ v c. (^ 1 1 n
CURVE
/POINT
xc YC (M-o/r
95.40 ?.3793
79.50 1.9141
68. 20 i .6002
53. 40 1 . 2100
43.00 0 .9T.01
36.70 ('.7984
23 .60 (' . 4967
19.50 0.4060
HEAN OF (AIS :: ) -
4 . CO n . 0?6 1
3.00 0.0598
1.60 0.0318
MCAL- 1.0000 HCAL-
CFC=1 ZST=1 WIC=2
NEU.CAL IP. NO- 1100818
ZNL= 5.30V IINF=
-0.04
0.11
0.07
0. 10
0.14
0.09
o. ir.
0.01
0.0?
2.11
1 . 36
7.13
0.000
DCF-3
151:21
0
IIP. \ ;jur; a
f.HIFT
HEFL
xs
95. 46
79. 41
68.00
T-3.06
42.57
76.21
22.98
18.85
MEAN OF
MS - 1
CFC^l
PR V. CAI
880809-
r rr
FKOH PREVIOUS
CC1HC Y
CIIKVE
;:SHI F i
YS* (S-O/C
2.3793
1 .9190
1 .6J7B
1 .2193
0.9f-8f>
0.8059
0.4990
0.4060
(AHS 7.) -
t t
II
1 1
.0094 US =
ZST = I UFC:-2
IP. NO- 080809
170322 995 AC
n /T -- - i IIFI i
0.00
0.25
0.47
0.77
0.91
0.94
0. 48
0.00
0. 48
1 1
II
11
0 . 8 J 7
DGF = 3
165450
1 1 VE
- n/T
EQUATIONS AND COEFFICIENTS
**************************
X = (MCAL * X ) t F A3*X I A2*X
I AI
Ai
A2
A3
A4
AS
co2 /N:
O.OOOOOOOE 00
0.I976748E-01
0.5409156E-04
0.I414909E-08
O.OOOOOOOE 00
tODOTinu
mi i -
r THAR-T nFFiFTTinN vr. F-TT r.02 /N?
N)
O
-------
PAGE 2
FROD F'ROCESSED :
X EQUIPMENT ID * :
CALIBRATION NAME I
CALIBRATION !
TEST SITE i
CALID DONE AT I
OPERATOR COMMENT:
10122:32 08-24-88
789433
C02A-CR23
880824-102232
A2S1
09105 08-24-88
EPA-HOR-R23-WORKE
***»***» n A f. T E R SITE «*****»*
*** ***
«»* ANALYZER CALIBRATION CURVE ANALYSIS *»*
M* *»*
***»»»*********»* l*****M*»*»*»4****tt****«
AAAAA
AA <\<\
AA AA
AA t:h
AAAAA&A
AA AA
AA AA
*> 2 "i ~» ">
?"* 22
22
*. 4.
22
?22 2
222 2 2 "' n
= = = == = = = = . = = _ = _ = = _= KNOWN OK ntAbUKtl" INI-'OIS = -- = - = ------ = = = = =
EFACYL* VENDOR CYLIP UCOCE DATA KEAS NOMINAL ACTIVE
OR OR OR FOINT IiEFL CONC EFS CONC
(iLNCOti dLENDER RNG (:r YC (M-o/c
95.40 ?.379P 0.0?
79.50 1 .9125 0.03
68.30 1.6014 0.01
53.40 1 . 2098 0.08
43.00 0.9510 0.05
36.60 0.7V7T. O.?0
23.00 0.19^7 0.16
19.40 0.4061 0.03
MEAN OF (AHS 7.) 0.07
4.80 (1.0971 3.10
3.00 0.0/.04 0.26
1.50 0.0301 2.04
HCAL- i.oooo I 0.56
II 11
II 11
11 11
HC = 1 .0082 US - -0.710
CFC=1 ZST=1 UFC=2 DGF=3
F RV.CAL If«.NO= 3R0809 165450
880809-170322 995 AC-TIVE
- rrr ri/T - - furrr n/T -
EQUATIONS AND COEFFICIENTS
**************************
X = (MCAL * X ) t HCAL
C M
DECREE FIT
HCAL =
BCAL -
0.1000000E 01
O.OOOOOOOE 00
4
A5*X
C
3 2
t A4*X 4 A3*X
C C
Al --
A2 -
A3 =
A4 =
A5 =
i A2*X i A) =
C
O.OOOOOOOE 00
0.2000604E-01
0.4685111E-04
0.5164976E-07
O.OOOOOOOE 00
mi i -CPAI r
nrrtFriinN VR FT.T C02 /N2
f
ro
-------
FROIi FROCESSEli
X EQUIPMENT ID I
CALIBRATION NAME
CALIBRATION *
TEST SITE
CALI6 I'ONE AT
OPERATOR COMMENT
10:45:i? 08-26- 6FJ
789433
C02A-CR23
8B0826-1045I9
A251
09:05 08-25-88
*-HOF:-F.-22-yCfxKE
««*»*««« ,, a r E R C I II **««»»»
**« «**
*»» AK'ALYZER CALIBRATION CURVE AK'Airr.lS *l»
»** . «**
tt*MMt**»l*«*»»t*M»*****M**t«4M*4*****
AAAAA
AA hh
AA CiA
A A (:h
AAAAAAA
AA
(:<<
I 1
-__ = _ = = -s. = = .-;aS= KNUUN OR NEASUF.TU INPUIS -- -----= = --__^-_
EFACYLI VENDOR CYLID VCODE DATA MEAS NOMINAL ACTIVE
OR OR OR fOINT DEFL CONC EFS CONC
6LNCOD KLENliER RNG 6LNRT TYFES XM YM YE
616660 11
146293 II
6752 11
6180 II
155139 11
33470 II
6442 11
61575 11
.'44: 14 II |
391539 11 |
66207 || |
CURVE 95.40 2.3803 11
CURVE 79.40 1.9123 II
CURVE 68.20 1.6013 II
CURVE 03.30 1.2088 II
CUF.VE 42.90 0.9515 II
CURVE 36.60 0.79V1 II
CURVE 23.50 0.4959 11
CURVE 19.40 0.4060 II
1 N«hl D -1.60 :..:. ^ 4 1 11
1 NAME 1. 3.00 0.0606 II
1 NAMED 1.50 0.0295 II
NOTE 11! CYLINDER NOT DEFINED IN THE EOUIFMEM1 FILE SYSTEM.
NOTE t : YR Fflk u&MFIi r VI c, ic ctriiinnc ere t nur i IIUCLUIC ir r, >
___--.-: i ....-.-- f.UKVr C('M
FIT OUAI IT, OF NEU CURVE
DEFL rrm v /.POINT
xr re (M-o/c
S-J.40 .'.JbOO 0.01
77. 40 1 . "124 0.00
68. 20 1 .6018 0.03
T-3. 10 1 . 2097 0.07
42. 90 " . v:;.o: 0.1-1
36.60 (..;; i,5 <.>.'.>'
23 ,',(> '> . 4? A 7 0. 1 A
19 . 40 0 . 4v5>- ( . d"
MEAN OF .~:- 0 0.45
53.03 1 . 2 1 fi :< 0.71
42.54 0.'?r.BI O.FJ4
:',6.18 0.805? O.H:.
?2.97 0.49H8 0.43
18.84 (>.4059 C. .00
MEAN OF .nKS V. , 0.44
(1 II
II II
II II
fib - i .0084 fcS . . 4
CFC - 1 ; r,T = i un. . nor -..«
F-RV.CALI6.NO- IK<'fs-:.V 16541.0
bflOOO?- 1 :'."i322 '/': r^C ll'.'l
- - II ll - I - 1 .11 1 1 f 1 , 1
tUUAIlUNb AMU LULtflLltNIb
**«**$********************
-------
FADE 2
EQUIPMENT 10 *
CALIBRATION NAME
CALIBRATION
TEST SITE
CALIB C'ONE AT
OPERATOR COMMENT
09:09:54 o9-oi-ee
789433
C02A-CR23
B80901-090954
A251
09:05 08-31-B8
EFA-HOR~R23-WOKNE
******** MASTER SITE 4 * * * * 4 4 *
«*« «*«
*** ANALYZER CALIBRATION CUKVF ANALYSIS ***
«*« «»»
|*«ti«********:M**********tM*4M**44«44*4*
AAAAA
AA AA
AA AA
AA AA
AAAAAAA
AA AA
AA AA
.* J >
sri
I
11
11
EF'ACYL*
OR
BINCOli
B 16(460
146293
B752
B1BO
155139
33470
B442
B1575
244214
391539
66207
NOTE 11
unrp *
ixnuwri UK ntnauKLi' i nr u i a = = =
VENDOR CYLIti VCObE [lATA HEAS
OR
BLENDER RNG
11
11
«l
11
It
11
»1
II
11
»1
*l
i CYLINIiER NOT
VG rnt- MAMrn
OR FOINT HEFL
BLNRT TYFES XH
11 CURVE 95.40
1 CURVE 79. SO
11 CURVE 6B.30
1 CURVE 53.40
»1 CURVE 43.00
11 CURVE 36.70
II CURVE 23.50
11 CURVE 19. GO
II NAHEti 4.90
11 NAHEH 3.00
11 NAMED 1.60
DEFINE!' IN THE EOUIFMENI
= i_ = = = _=: iii = -_ = = . i.~ = -s-- ... i. UK vi- i imrnKibUNa - = --- ..-.-, ^ = -
NOMINAL ACTIVE FIT OUAL I 1 Y Or NEU CURVE f.MIFT FROM FFEVIOUS CURVE
CONC EFS CONC DEFL fOK'C Y XfOINT HEFL CONC Y ZSHIFT
YM YE Xt YC (M-D/r XS YS* (S-D/C
2.3803 11 - 95.40 2.3797 0.03 95.47 2.3797 0.00
1.9123 11 79.50 -.9130 0.04 79.43 i.9195 0.34
1.6013 II 68.30 1.6017 0.03 *8.13 1.6110 0.58
1.2088 II 53.40 1.2095 0.06 T-3.09 1.2200 O.B7
0.9515 It 43.00 0.9502 -0.14 42.60 0.9596 1.00
0.7991 II 36.70 0.7988 0.04 36.24 0.8067 0.99
0.4909 II 23.00 0.49S3 O.JI 22.92 0.4977 0.47
0.4060 11 19. GO 0.4070 0.25 18.89 0.4070 -0.00
MEAN OF (Ai O.S3
0.0941 11 4.90 0.0986 4. 59 11 ||
0.0606 II 3.00 0.0601 0.84 II II
0.0295 11 1.60 0.0319 7.63 11 II
FILE SYSTEM. MCAL= 1.0000 BTAL- 0.000 MS = 1.0090 US -0.786
CFC=I ZST--1 MFC= 2 HGF-3 CFC=1 2ST = 1 UF(. ? DGF-3
NEU. CALIB. NO- 880901-090954 F F. V. CAL I B . NO- 880809 16G4T.O
*NL= 5.423 IINF^ 0 880809-170322 995 AC-IIVE
rvic ic c-c-rmniic crc rnur /iiMCUifrrrri^ .. -~ rrr nyr _ rurcrr r./r
EQUATIONS AND COEFFICIENTS
**>********************4i**
X = (MCAL * X > t BCAL
C H
MCAL
BCAL
DEGREE FIT
432
A5*X 1 A4*X t A3*X I A2*X + Al - F'CT C02
C C C C
0.1000000E 01
O.OOOOOOOE 00
Al
A2
A3
A4
AS
O.OOOOOOOE 00
0.19B7993E-01
0.5030846E-04
0.2907069E-07
O.OOOOOOOE 00
f
-------
PAGE 2
PROD PROCESSED
Y EQUIPMENT ID 1
CALIBRATION NAME
CALIBRATION *
TEST SITE
CALIB DONE AT
GfErvHToK COMMENT
13I52I32
789433
C02A-CR2
880913-1
A251
09- 13
3
35232
-68 ******** M
***
***
***
***»
ANALYZER
********
ASTER SITE » * 4 4 4 4 4 *
M4
CALIBRATION CURVE AI.'ALYf.lS » * *
*»*
**************** **..»*< f***** 4 **<
09S05 09-01-KH
EF A-HOR-
R23-UORK
;.- = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = KNOUM OR MEASURED
EPACYLI VENDOR CYLID VCODE DATA
OR OR
BLNCOD BLENDER RNG
B16660 11
146293 11
B752 II
B180 11
155139 11
33470 11
B442 II
B1575 11
N36920 1!
343923 11
262947 tl
HI 778 11
B2386 tl
B2211 tl
D1184 11
157656 tl
244214 tl
391539 tl
66207 tl
NOTE tit CYLINDER NOT
NOTE *: YS FOR NAMFFl
OR
BLNRT
11
tl
ti
tl
11
11
tl
11
11
11
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
DEFINED
r Y L s is
POINT
TYPES
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
NAMED
NAHED
NAHED
NAHED
NAHED
NAHED
NAHED
NAHED
NAHED
NAHED
NAMED
IN THE
1 |J F- 1 1 T c
iwrui^
HEAS
DEFL
XH
95.40
79.50
68.30
53.40
43.00
36.70
23.50
19. 40
95. VO
78. 10
68.40
53.30
43.70
36.80
22.90
17.60
4.70
3.00
1 .50
EQUIPMENT
NOMINAL
COK'C
YM
2.3803
1.9123
1 .6013
1 .2088
0.9515
0. 7991
0. 4959
0. 40/.0
J.3S50
1 .8730
1 .6050
1 .2060
0.9696
0.8017
0.4812
0.3647
0.0941
0.0606
0.0295
A A Art A 2? 22
AA AA 22
AA AA *'
AA AA 22
AAAAAAA 22
AA A A 1/22
A A AA 2222:-
:: 5555:. fj:.
21' \.>'j
'» i r-
J ,'.»'>' I \ I
','.,
rr « i
' ' i c ' " ' ' *"
1
1 1
1 1 1
1
1
1
III 1
- - - -- - ---:--- i ML-iir rriMC- AC- i cniiQ ::--_ = --.-.--..- --
ACTIVE
EFS COK'C
YE
11
II
11
II
II
II
II
11
It
tl
11
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
tl
11
tl
FILE SYSTEM.
F-RFUinnt; FFt; rnwr MIH<;U i r TTM i
FIT QUALITY OF MEW CURVE I SHIFT
DEFL CONC Y ZF
XC YC (M-
90.40 2.3802
79.50 1 . 9125
68.30 1 .6012
53.40 1.2094
43.00 O.vr.or;
36. 70 0 . 7VS 4
23.50 0 . 4V6.1
19.40 '<.40:.8
ML AN OF (AhS /.: =
75.9(1 :..r->:.4
78.10 1.8728
68.40 1.6039
03.30 1.2068
43.70 0.9676
36.80 0.8018
2?. 90 0.4829
17.60 0.3666
4.70 0.0950
3.00 0.0604
1.50 0.0301
MCAL= 1.0000 BCAL =
CFC=1 ZST=1 UFC=2
K'EU. CALIB. N0 = 680913-1
ZNL= 5.442 IINF=
OINT
C)/C
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.05
0.10
0.04
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.01
0.07
0.07
0.21
0.01
0.36
0.51
0.91
0.38
1 .93
0.000
DGF = 3
35232
0
DEFL
XS
95.49
79.45
68. 15
53. 13
42.64
36.28
22.97
18.83
MEAN OF
MS = 1
FKOM PREVIOUS
cone y
YS* <
2.3802
1 .9201
1.6118
1 .2209
0.9605
0.8076
0.4907
0. 4056
< ft h S '/. > -
1
11
11
.0086 BS =
CPC=1 ZST=1 UFC=2
FRV. CALIB. NO BBOB09
880809-
ffC
70322 995 AC
UJKVF.
zsHiri
S-O/'C
-0.00
0.40
0.66
0.9T.
1 .OS
1 .03
0. 48
- 0.00
0.--.7
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
I
1
11
-0.73?
DGF^.l
1654'JO
1 IVE
ri / i - .. - i M r i" r n / 1
EQUATIONS AND COEFFICIENTS
**************************
X = (MCAL * X ) + 6CAL
C H
MCAL =
PCAL =
0.1000000E 01
O.OOOOOOOE 00
43
A5*X \ A4*X
C C
A3*X
Al =
A2 =
A3 =
A4 =
A5 =
A2*X
DEGREE FIT
Al = PCT C02 /N2
O.OOOOOOOE 00
0. 1998198E-01
0.4715868E-04
0.514998BE-07
O.OOOOOOOE 00
-------
f-Hllt *
PROD PROCESSED
Y EQUIPMENT ID *
CALIBRATION NAME
CALIBRATION
TEBT SITE
CALIB DONE AT
OPERATOR COMMENT
13144126 08-10-68
787433
C02A-CR23
880810-134426
A2S1
09105 08-10-88
EPA-HOK-R23-BLINE
«**«**«* HAT. TER SITE ********
tt* ***
** ANALYZER CALIBRATION CURVE ANALYSIS Mt
tt* *»
************************************l*(***«
AAAAA
AA AA
AA AA
AA AA
AAAAAAA
AA AA
AA AA
22222
22 22
22
22
22
222 2
2222222
5555555
55
55
555555
SS
55 55
55555
1
11
1111
EPACYLI
OR
BLNCOD
368730
343923
262947
B177BO
B23B6
B2211
B1184
157656
616660
146293
B7S2
B180
133139
33470
B442
B1575
244214
391539
66207
NOTE4!!!
unrc *
VENDOR
OR
BLENDER
II
11
II
II
II
11
11
tl
11
1
11
II
1
tl
tl
tl
11
1
11
CYLID VCODE
OR
RNO BLNRT
11
1
tl
II
11
11
tl
fl
11
tt
11
I
II
1
tl
1
tl
1
11
CYLINDER NOT DEFINED
vc rnt'
MAMFTI rvi Q t G
HBUKtll
DATA
POINT
TYPES
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
CURVE
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
NAMED
IN THE
NEA8
DEFL
XM
96.50
78.20
68.50
53.30
43.80
36.90
22.90
17.60
95.40
79.50
68.30
53.40
43.00
36.70
23.50
19.40
4.70
2.90
1 .40
EQUIPMENT
NOMINAL
CONC
YM
2.4120
1.8730
1.6050
1.2060
0.9696
0.8017
0.4812
0.3647
2.3803
1.9120
1.6013
1.2088
0.9515
0.7991
0.4959
0.4060
0.0941
0.0606
0.0295
ACTIVE
EFB CONC
YE
11
tl
tl
II
11
1
tl
tt
tl
tt
t
II
1
11
1
II
1
tl
11
FILE SYSTEM.
t-RFutmiG FFQ rnur MIKIGMI err n i
FIT QUALITY OF NEW CURVE
DEFL CONC Y ZPOINT
XC YC (M-O/C
96.50 2.4112 -0.03
78.20 1.8744 0.07
68.50 1.6054 0.03
53.30 1.2054 -0.05
43.80 0.9683 -0.13
36.90 0.8023 0.08
22.90 0.4R12 -0.01
17.60 0.3650 0.08
MEAN OF (ADS X) = 0.06
95.40 2.3779 -0.10
79. SO 1.9112 -0.04
68.30 1.6000 -0.08
53.40 1.2079 -0.07
43.00 0.9488 -0.28
36.70 0.7976 -0.19
23.50 0.4945 -0.28
19.40 0.4041 -0.47
4.70 0.0944 0.28
2.90 O.OSBO -4.55
1.40 0.0279 -5.83
MCAL" 1.0000 fiCAL" 0.000
CFC'l ZSTM UFC-2 DGF-3
NEU. CALIB. N0= 680010-134426
ZNL* 5.451 IINF- 0
SHIFT
DEFL
XS
96.54
78.09
68.31
52.99
43.41
36.45
22.34
17.00
MFAN OF
'
MS = 1 .
FROM PREVIOUS
CURVE
CONC Y Z6HIFT
YS* (8-O/C
2.4112
1.8823
1.6160
1.2174
0.9794
0.8117
0.4845
0.3650
-
11
11
1
11
II
II
II
tl
tl
11
11
0081 bS =
CFC-1 ZST-1 WFC = 2
PRV.CALIB.NO= B80809-
860809-1
err
-0.00
0.42
0.66
0.99
1.14
1.17
0.69
-0.00
0.63
11
tl
II
II
1
II
1
II
tl
II
11
-0.744
DGF-3
165450
70322 995 AC-TIVE
ti t T _ _ _ » »ir- r- r- r. * v
EQUATIONS AND COEFFICIENTS
«*******«******"*""**"
X * (MCAL « X ) + BCAL
C M
MCAL » 0.1000000E 01
BCAL O.OOOOOOOE 00
DEGREE FIT
432
A5»X 4 A4*X i A3*X t <)2*X i Al ' PCT C02 /N2
C C C C
: 3
Al
A2
A3
A4
AS
O.OOOOOOOE 00
0.19B394BE-01
O.SOS08S9E-04
0.2934626E-07
O.OOOOOOOE 00
ro
Ul
-------
ATTACHMENT N
o
3
O
0)
O
O
CO
O
o>
O
Q
CO
O
o
O
Q
CO
0.10
0.05
0.00
-0.05
-0.10
0.0
0.0
0.09
0.07
0.05
0.03
0.01
0.0
Means & 90% C.l.s for Daily
Cal. Curve Differences
0.5
1.0 1.5
Range 23 (% C02)
Means & Statistical Variability
for Daily Cal. Curve Differences
00 _
-04 -
Error Bars - +/- 3 Std. Dev.s
4
1
\
\
, -"
__
_-,
1
^-~__L^ . .
"* n
!
0.5 1.0 1.5
Range 23 (%CO2)
Std. Deviations of Daily
Cal. Curve Differences
2.0
2.5
7
0.5
1.0 1.5
Range 23 (%CO2)
2.0
2.5
-------
N-l
o
o
>.
o
O
Q
CO
O
O
>>
u
o
U
CO
ul
o
o
>>
u
0>
o
0.10
0.05
0.00
-0.05
-0.10
0.0
-0.2
-0
-0.4
0.0
0.09
0.07'
0.05'
Means & 90% C.l.s of HORIBA
Daily Calibration Curves
0.5
1.0 1.5
Range 23 (%CO2)
2.0
Means & Statistical Variability
of HORIBA Daily Calibration Curves
Error Bars - +/- 3 Std. Dev.s
0.5 1.0 1.5
Range 23 (%C02;
Std. Deviations of HORIBA
Daily Calibration Curves
2.0
2.5
Q
CO
0.03'
0.01
0.0
0.5
1.0 1.5
Range 23 (%CO2)
2.0
2.5
-------
N-2
u
o
o
o
o
CO
ul
55
o
o
u
0)
o
CO
ul
o
8
>>
U
0)
3
0.10
0.05
0.00
-0.05
-0.10
0.0
-0.4
0.0
0.09'
0.07'
Means & 90% C.l.s of MSA
Daily Calibration Curves
0.5
1.0 1.5
Range 23 (%C02)
Means & Statistical Variability
of MSA Daily Calibration Curves
2.0
Error Bars - +/- 3 Std. Oev.s
0.5
1.0 1.5
Range 23 (%CO2)
Std. Deviations of MSA
Daily Calibration Curves
0.05'
2.0
0.03'
CO
III
0.01
0.0
0.5
1.0 1.5
Range 23 (%CO2)
2.0
2.5
-------
TABLEC
Range 22 Background Level
Agreement Data
TABLE D
Range 23 Background Level
Agreeifient Data
Date
8/10/88
9/8/88
Curve
Cafe
S
S
S
W
W
w
w
w
w
S
S
S
Cylinder
Cone
0.0941
0 0606
0.0295
0 0941
0.0606
0 0295
0.0941
0.0606
0.0295
0.0941
0.0606
0.0295
HORIBA
Cone
0 0964
0.0598
0 0289
0.0963
0.0598
0.0289
0.0960
0.0592
0.0300
0.0960
0.0592
0 0300
MSA
Cone
0 0979
0 0608
0 0294
0 0974
0 0605
0 0293
0 0955
0 0595
0 0301
0 0951
0 0592
0 0300
HORIBA MSA
%FS Dirt
0 1 500
0 1000
0.0500
-0.1 100
0 0700
-0 0400
0 0500
0 0300
0 0100
0 0900
0 0000
0 0000
AVERAGE
-0.0350
STODEV
0.0678
Date
8/1 0/B8
a/t 1/88
8/12/88
8/16/88
8/1 7/88
8/18/88
8/24/88
8/25/88
8/31/88
9/1/88
Curve
Cote
S
S
S
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
S
S
S
Cylinder
Cone
0 0941
0.0606
0.0295
0.0941
0.0606
0 0295
0.0941
0.0606
0 0295
0.0941
0.0606
0 0295
0.0941
0.0606
0 0295
0 0941
0 0606
0 0295
0.0941
0.0606
0 0295
0.0941
0.0606
0.0295
0.0941
0.0606
0 0295
0.0941
0 0606
0 0295
0.0941
0.0606
0.0295
0.0941
0.0606
0 0295
HORIBA
Cone
0.0944
0.0580
0.0279
0.0950
0 0584
0 0281
0 0967
0.0602
0 0300
0.0971
0 0604
0.0301
0.0967
0.0602
0 0300
0.0970
0 0604
0 0301
0.0961
0 0598
0 0318
0.0971
0 0604
0.0301
0.0968
0.0602
0 0300
0.0986
0.0601
0.0319
0.0950
0.0604
0.0301
0.0943
0 0599
0 0298
MSA
Cone
0.0966
0 0581
0.0380
0 0967
0.0582
0 0381
0.0969
0.0604
0 0321
0.0970
0 0591
0.0314
0 0977
0.0595
0 0297
0.0968
0.0603
0 0301
0.0959
0 0597
0 0297
0.0966
0.0621
0 0300
0.0972
0 0605
0.0281
0.1022
0.0578
0 0378
0.0946
0 0561
0.0240
0.0944
0 0560
0 0239
HORIBAMSA
%FS Dili
0.088
0 004
0.404
0.068
0.008
-0.4
0.008
0 008
0 084
0 004
0 052
0 052
0.04
0 028
0012
0 008
0.004
0
0.008
0.004
0 084
0.02
-0.066
0 004
-0.016
-001 2
0 076
-0.144
0.092
-0 236
0.016
0 172
0 244
-0 004
0 156
0 236
AVERAGE
-0.01 1
STDDEV
0.133
H
H
>
r>
H
O
------- |