TECHNICAL REPORT
SENSITIVITY OF TEST CYCLE AND FUEL TYPE
ON A CRUSADER 350 INBOARD MARINE ENGINE
TEST RESULTS - 1992
by
MIKE SAMULSKI
Engine and Vehicle Regulations Branch
Technicians:
TIM DAVIS, JOE HURLEY, MIKE MATTHEWS
Technology Evaluation and Testing Support Branch
NOTICE
Technical Reports do not necessarily represent final EPA decisions
or positions. They are intended to present technical analysis of
issues using- data which are currently available. The purpose in
the release, of such reports is to facilitate the exchange of
technical information and to inform the public of technical
developments which may form the basis for a final EPA decision,
position, or regulatory action.
Engine and Vehicle Regulations Branch
Standards Development and Support Division
Office of Mobile Sources
Office of Air and Radiation
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
-------
Table of Contents
Page
List of Tables 3
List of Figures 6
1 Executive Summary 7
2 Introduction 7
3 Engine 8
4 Fuels 9
5 Test Procedures 9
5.1 Steady-State Checkout 9
5.2 Transient Testing 10
5.3 Steady-State Test Procedures 10
5.4 Emission Sampling 11
6 Certification Fuel (Indolene) Testing/Results 12
6.1 HD-FTP Testing/Results 12
6.2 Steady-State (ICOMIA and BSO) Testing/Results 13
7 Clean Air Act Baseline Fuel Testing/Results 16
7.1 HD-FTP Testing/Results 16
7.2 Steady-State. (ICOMIA and BSO) Testing/Results 17
7.3 Sensitivity of Carburetor Calibration on
Emissions 17
8 Low T-90 Fuel Testing/Results 24
8.1 HD-FTP Testing/Results 24
8.2 Steady-State (ICOMIA and BSO) Testing/Results 25
9 Gasohol Fuel Testing/Results 29
9.1 HD-FTP Testing/Results 29
9.2 Steady-State (ICOMIA and BSO) Testing/Results 30
10 Higher Ethanol Blends—Transient Tests 33
11 30% Ethanol Blend Testing/Results 35
11.1 HD-FTP Testing/Results 35
11.2 Steady-State (ICOMIA and BSO) Testing/Results 36
-------
Page
12 40% Ethanol Blend Testing/Results 39
12.1 HD-FTP Testing/Results 39
12.2 Steady-State (ICOMIA and BSO) Testing/Results 39
13 Effects of Transience on Emissions from Marine
Engines 43
13.1 Transient ICOMIA Cycles = = , . 43
13.2 Transient ICOMIA Testing/Results 44
14 Effects of Alcohols on FID Measurements of HC 46
15 Analysis and Conclusions 47
List of Tables
3.1 Engine Specifications 8
5.1 Crusader Marine Inboard Engine
Steady-State Performance Data 10
6.1 Certification Fuel, Heavy-Duty Gasoline
Transient Test Results 12
6:2 Certification Fuel, ICOMIA and BSO Steady-
State Test #1 Results 14
6.3 Certification Fuel, ICOMIA and BSO Steady-
State Test 12 Results 15
7.1 Clean Air Act Baseline Fuel, Heavy-Duty
Gasoline Transient Test Results 16
7.2 Emission Results due to Carburetor Calibration 17
7.3 McLaren and EPA Modal Results for the Crusader
Engine 18
7.4 Clean Air Act Baseline Fuel, ICOMIA and BSO
Steady-State Test f 1 Results 19
7.5 Clean Air Act Baseline Fuel, ICOMIA and BSO
SteadyrState Test f2 Results 20
-------
Page
7.6 Clean Air Act Baseline Fuel, ICOMIA and BSO
Steady-State Test #3 Results 21
7.7 Clean Air Act Baseline Fuel, ICOMIA and BSO
Steady-State (McLaren Modes) Test #4 Results 22
7.8 Clean Air Act Baseline Fuel, ICOMIA and BSO
Steady-State (McLaren Modes) Test 15 Result- . 23
8.1 Low T-90 Fuel, Heavy-Duty Gasoline
Transient Test Results 24
8.2 Low T-90 Fuel, ICOMIA and BSO Steady-State
Test #1 Results 26
8.3 Low T-90 Fuel, ICOMIA and BSO Steady-State
Test #2 Results 27
8.4 Low T-90 Fuel, ICOMIA and BSO Steady-State
Test #3 Results 28
9.1 Gasohol Fuel, Heavy-Duty Gasoline
Transient Test Results 29
9.2 Gasohol Fuel, ICOMIA and BSO Steady-State
Test f 1 Results 31
9.3 Gasohol Fuel, ICOMIA and BSO Steady-State
Test #2 Results 32
10.1 20% Ethanol Blend, Heavy-Duty Gasoline
Transient Test Results 33
10.2 30% Ethanol Blend, Heavy-Duty Gasoline
Transient Test Results 34
10.3 40% Ethanol Blend, Heavy-Duty Gasoline
Transient Test Results 34
11.1 30% Ethanol Blend Fuel, (with Choke Mechanism
Heavy-Duty Gasoline Transient Test Results ... 35
11.2 30% Ethanol Blend Fuel, ICOMIA and BSO Steady-
State Test #1 Results 37
11.3 30% Ethanol Blend Fuel, ICOMIA and BSO Steady-
State Test #2 Results 38
12.1 40% Ethanol Blend Fuel, ICOMIA and BSO Steady-
State Test #1 Results 40
-------
Page
12.2 40% Ethanol Blend Fuel, ICOMIA and BSO Steady-
State Test 12 Results 41
12.3 40% Ethanol Blend Fuel, ICOMIA and BSO Steady-
State Test #3 Results 42
13.1 CAAB Fuel No Transience ICOMIA (Steady-State)
Test Results 44
13.2 CAAB Fuel Low Transience ICOMIA (One 16-Min.
Series) Test Results 44
13.3 CAAB Fuel Low Transience ICOMIA (Four 4-Min.
Series) Test Results 45
13.4 CAAB Fuel Low Transience ICOMIA (Sixteen 1-Min.
Series) Test Results 45
14.1 Approximate Effects of Alcohols on HC Results 46
15.1 Emissions Summary for Crusader 350 Marine
Inboard Engine, Certification Fuel 47
15.2 Emissions Summary for Crusader 350 Marine
Inboard Engine, Clean Air Act Baseline Fuel .. 48
15.3 Changes in Emissions due to Carburetor
Calibration, (Using McLaren Modes for
Correlation) Clean Air Act Baseline Fuel 48
15.4 Emissions Summary for Crusader 350 Marine
Inboard Engine, Low T-90 Fuel 49
15.5 Emissions Summary for Crusader 350 Marine
Inboard Engine, Gasohol Fuel 49
15.6 Emissions Summary for Crusader 350 Marine
Inboard Engine, 30% Ethanol Blend Fuel 49
15.7 Emissions Summary for Crusader 350 Marine
Inboard Engine, 40% Ethanol Blend Fuel 50
15.8 Emissions Summary for Crusader 350 Marine
Inboard Engine, Alcohol Blends on ICOMIA Test
Procedure 50
15.9 Emissions Summary for Crusader 350 Marine
Inboard Engine, Effects of Added Transience to
ICOMIA Cycle (CAAB Fuel) 51
-------
Page
List of Figures
13.1 Low Transience ICOMIA Test Cycle (One 16-Minute
Series) 43
15.1 Effects of Ethanol in Fuel 50
-------
1. Executive Summary
This report contains emission test results from a Crusader 350
marine inboard engine. Emission testing included EPA Heavy-Duty
Federal Test Procedure (HD-FTP) transient emission tests,
International Council of Marine Industry Associations (ICOMIA) 5-
mode steady-state tests, and Bodensee Schiffahrts Ordnug (BSO)
8(9)-mode steady-state tests. This gasoline engine was tested
while operating on on-highway certification fuel (Indolene) and
Clean Air Act Baseline (CAAB) fuel, as well as on a 12% MTBE blend
and several ethanol blends ranging from 10% to 40%. Diluted
sampling was used to test for emissions of HC, CO, and NOX. In
addition, some work was done on the emission effects of adding
transience to the ICOMIA test cycle.
This test program gives some insight into the characterization
of baseline emissions for a new marine inboard engine as well as
potential emission reductions through the use of oxygenated fuels.
As the percentage of alcohol in the fuel increased, HC and CO
decreased and NOX increased without a significant change in power.
Fuel consumption also increased slightly.
Some effort was put into observing the ability of carburetor
calibrations to reduce emissions. There seemed to be some tradeoff
between HC and NOX.
Finally, adding transience to the ICOMIA cycle increased HC,
CO, and BSFC and decreased NOX results. Only HC seemed to be
affected by the amount of transience added. An increase in HC was
expected with an increase in transience due to rich fuel-air ratios
typical during accelerations.
2. Introduction
The Clean Air Act mandates that EPA determine the significance
of the contribution of nonroad engines and vehicles to pollution in
ozone and CO nonattainment areas by November 15, 1992. Marine
engines and vessels are categorized as part of nonroad, but little
is known about their emission levels.
A team has been assembled, within EPA, to characterize the
market structure for the marine industry as well as the operation
characteristics of marine engines and vessels. One role of this
marine team is to gather emission data for all types of marine
engines. Therefore, EPA is planning to develop testing facilities
for the testing of a wide range of engines. Currently, EPA has the
capabilities to test large, inboard marine engines. Through
cooperation with Crusader Marine Engines, an inboard marine engine
has been tested by both industry and EPA.
-------
At EPA's National Vehicle and Fuel Emissions Laboratory
(NVFEL), the Crusader engine was tested over the on-highway
transient test procedure, a 5-mode marine steady-state test
procedure and an 8 (9)-mode marine steady-state test procedure. In
addition, fuel effects of a methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE)
blend and several ethanol blends were studied. Test results for
the marine inboard engine are presented in this report.
3. Engine
Table 3.1 summarizes the specifications for the Crusader
marine inboard engine which was used in this program. The marine
prototype was a naturally aspirated, V-configuration, 8-cylinder,
350 in3 displacement heavy-duty otto-cycle engine. Rated and peak
torque speeds for this carburetted engine were 4400 and 2600 RPM,
respectively. Rated horsepower for this marine engine was 220 hp.
Marinization is the term used to describe the process used to
adapt an automobile engine for marine applications. The major
change that Crusader makes to the GM small block engine is
additional cooling to make up for the lack of air flow around the
engine due to the enclosed engine compartments in boats. Other
adaptations include a change in cam-timing to optimize power and
fuel consumption, increased oil pan size, and an enrichment of the
fuel-air ratio.
Table 3.1
Engine Specifications
Manufacturer (Marinizer)
Base Engine Manufacturer
Manufacturer's Rated Power (HP)
Manufacturer' s Rated Speed (RPM)
EPA Measured Rated Power (HP)
EPA Measured Rated Speed (RPM)
Cylinder Configuration
Number of Cylinders
Displacement (cubic inches)
Fuel System
Crusader Engines
GM — Chevy small block
227
4400
222
4263
V
8
350
Quadrajet carburetor
-------
Fuels
Part of the scope of work for this test program was to compare
the effects of operating a marine inboard engine on various
alternative fuel blends. The engine was operated using on-highway
certification fuel (Indolene*) , Clean Air Act Baseline fuel (CAAB),
low T-90 (12% MTBE blend), gasohol (10% ethanol blend), as well as
20%, 30%, 40% ethanol blends. Ethanol was blended with CAAB fuel
in NVFEL's laboratory to create the higher ethanol blends.
The certification, CAAB, low T-90, and gasohol fuels were
introduced to the engine by transferring the fuel from the barrel
in which it was shipped to the normal laboratory fuel delivery
system by an auxiliary lift pump. Ethanol blends that were mixed
in-house were pumped directly from the barrel to the engine. All
fuels was delivered to the engine at a pressure of 0 to 0.5 psi and
at a temperature of less than 100° F.
Fuel specifications are included in the appendix for each of
the fuels.
5. Teat Procedures
5.1 Steady-State Checkout
The Crusader marine inboard engine was set up in National
Vehicle and Fuel Emissions Laboratory (NVFEL) test cell #1 and run
at both measured rated speed and peak torque speed with the
throttle wide open. At each of these conditions, the speed,
torque, and fuel flow were measured after stabilization occurred.
Each condition was considered stable when the engine oil
temperature stayed within it 2° F for two minutes. These values
were compared to the manufacturer's data to ensure that the engine
was set-up and running correctly.
With the installation complete, the engine was run at steady-
state conditions while speeds, torques, and fuel flows were
recorded. These values were compared to the engine manufacturer's
values (Table 5.1) and were found to be similar.
-------
Table 5.1
Crusader Marine Inboard Engine
Steady-State Performance Data
LAB
Crusader (McLaren)
EPA/NVFEL
Torque, ft-lb
2600 rpm
132
133
4400 rpm
288
268
Fuel Flow, Ibs/hr
2600 rpm
33
36
4400 rpm
126
122
5.2 Transient Testing
Following a torque map of the engine, two EPA on-highway HD-
FTP transient test sequences were performed on the engine. A test
sequence consisted of one cold-start (ambient temperature)
transient test plus two consecutive hot-start (steady-state
operating temperature) transient tests (sequence = 1 cold-start +
2 hot-start) . All gaseous (HC, CO, and NOX) emissions were
collected for each transient test. The cold-start and first hot-
start were used in determining the composite result. The HD-FTP
transient emissions tests were performed following procedures given
in CFR 40 Part 86 Subpart N for heavy-duty gasoline emissions
measurement.
When using fuels with high ethanol percentages, there is a
risk of corrosion damage to the carburetor and fuel pump if the
fuel is left in the engine over night. For this reason, forced
cool-downs were used for cold starts that were run using the high
ethanol fuels.
5.3 Steady-State (8-Mode) Testing
A 8(9)-mode steady-state cycle was used that combined all of
the modes from the ICOMIA and the BSO marine test cycles. By
weighting the modes appropriately, emission values were determined
for both the ICOMIA and the BSO cycle. The 5-mode ICOMIA cycle was
run as described in SAE papers 901596 and 901597. The additional
3(4) modes were taken from Article 13.11a of the BSO written by the
International Bodensee Shipping Commission. One mode in the BSO
procedure is only necessary if the full power at rated speed
deviates more than 5% from maximum power. This mode was not
necessary for the Crusader engine.
Gaseous emissions (HC, CO, and NOJ and brake specific fuel
consumption (BSFC) were measured for each mode, then composites
were computed using assigned weighting factors for the ICOMIA and
BSO procedures. All emissions measurements used dilute full-flow
10
-------
CVS sampling techniques.
Two steady-state emission tests were performed on the engine
using Indolene, gasohol, and 30% ethanol blend, three were
performed using low T-90 fuel and 40% ethanol blend, and five were
performed using CAAB fuel. The third tests run on the low T-90,40%
blend, and the CAAB fuel were run due to the inconsistencies
observed between the first and second tests. Test numbers 4 and 5
on the CAAB fuel were used as part of a correlation program with
McLaren Engines. In these two tests, EPA used the rated speed used
by McLaren rather than the rated speed observed in NVFEL.
The steady-state cycles are believed to be more appropriate
than the HD-FTP transient test for characterization of this engine
and for comparison of the effects of the different oxygenated fuels
on this engine. This is because the transient test was developed
based on data from on-highway trucks while the steady-state tests
were based on data from marine pleasure craft.
5.4 Emission Sampling
The engine was mounted on the test stand, and its flywheel was
connected to the dynamometer through a drive shaft torquemeter.
The exhaust systems for marinized engines differ from most other
systems. Coolant water and exhaust gasses are mixed before being
ejected from the engine in order to cool the gasses in order to
comply with Coast Guard safety regulations. The cooling water is
also used to reduce noise in the exhaust system (in place of a
muffler) . For this reason, it was necessary to block the water
before it mixed with the exhaust and route the water back to the
cooling tower through tapped holes in the exhaust manifold. An
exhaust tube was fabricated which blocked the cooling water while
allowing the exhaust gasses to be transferred to the CVS dilution
tunnel for sampling.
11
-------
6. Certification Fuel (Indolene) Testing/Results
6.1 HP-FTP Transient Testing/Results
After the engine was torque mapped on Indolene, two HD-FTP
transient tests were run in order to have data that could be used
. for comparison between a marine engine and a regulated on highway
engine. Each test consisted of one cold and two hot starts, with
the composite results computed from the cold start and first hot
start. A second hot start was run as an easy way to check
variability. The HD-FTP test results for the engine run on
Indolene are presented in Table 6.1. There were only small
differences (3.4% for HC and CO, 0.8% for NOS and BSFC) between the
emissions from the Crusader engine when it was run on Indolene as
compared to Clean Air Act Baseline fuel. These differences were
within the test-to-test variability of the engine.
Table 6.1:
Certification Fuel
Heavy-Duty Gasoline Transient: Teal: Results
HC
(g/hp-hr)
CO
(g/hp-hr)
NOX
(g/hp-hr)
BSFC
(Ib/hp-hr)
First Sequence
Cold Start
Hot Start #1
Hot Start #2
Composite*
9.984
10.060
9.596
10.049
185.5
184.0
181.7
184.2
3.435
3.118
3.132
3.163
0.606
0.597
0.594
0.598
Second Sequence
Cold Start
Hot Start #1
Hot Start #2
Composite*
9.963
9.665
9.580
9.707
186.6
184.3
182.0
184.6
3.354
3.276
3.120
3.287
0.605
0.594
0.591
0.596
Composite Average | 9 . 878
184.4 1 3.225 | 0.597
'Composite = 1/7(Cold Start) + 6/7(Hot Start #1)
12
-------
6.2 Steady-State (ICOMIA and BSO) Testing/Results
The steady-state test was performed twice on this engine. The
results for both tests were within 5 percent of each other for all
constituents. By weighting the modes appropriately, both the
ICOMIA and BSO test results were determined. For the ICOMIA test
procedure, composite HC, CO, and NOX levels were determined to be
5.955, 129.0, and 4.255 g/hp-hr respectively. For the BSO test
procedure, composite HC, CO, and NOX levels were 4.181, 122.5, and
4.472 g/hp-hr. Both steady-state procedures showed lower HC and CO
and higher NOX than the transient test= This was probably due to
rich operation during accelerations. Because the ICOMIA procedure
puts more emphasis on the modes with lower speed and torque than
the BSO procedure, the ICOMIA procedure showed higher HC and CO and
lower NOS than the BSO procedure.
The non-reduced ICOMIA and BSO steady-state test results are
presented in Tables 6.2 and 6.3. These tables are broken down into
four groups with the first grouping of data identifying the actual
test modes, and mode weighting factor used in computing the mode-
weighted composite brake specific emissions, for both steady-state
procedures, at the bottom of each table. The other groupings of
data include a .mass emission' rate in grams/hour for each mode, a
fuel specific emission result at each mode in grams/pound of fuel
consumed, and finally the brake specific emission rate at each mode
is given in grams/horsepower-hour.
13
-------
T«bl« 6.2:
Certification Fu«l
ICOM1A and BSO Steady-State Teat f1 Results
8-Mode Test Points
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
3
Speed
% of Rated
Torque Weighting Factor Speed
* of WOT icOMIA
100 100 6%
80 71.6 14%
60 46.5 15%
40 25.3 25%
idle 0 40%
50 35.4
70 58.6
90 85.3
BSO rPm
Torque
ft-lb HP
10% 4263 274.1 - 222.5
5% 3410 196.3 127.5
10% 2558 127.5 62.1
10% 1705 69.3 22.5
30% 700 0.0 0.0
10% 2132 97.0 39.4
20% 2984 160.6 91.2
5% 3837 210.5 153.8
Mode g/hr results
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
224.6
127.7
62.8
23.0
0.1
40.0
91.4
152.4
Fuel
Ib/hr
122.80
65.12
33.49
16.74
3.72
22.31
40.91
83.68
HC
g/hr
567.1
277.7
141.4
97.2
384.0
118.6
185.5
391.0
CO
g/hr
45,183
9,174
2, 504
3,008
1, 952
2,851
3, 161
24,220
NO,
g/hr
557.6
746.6
374.3
28.4
1.5
146.8
668.0
468.3
CO,
g/hr
102,054
68,566
37,899
14,809
4,179
27,455
54,678
77,291
Mode g/lb fuel
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
224.6
127.7
62.8
23.0
0.1
40.0
91.4
152.4
Fuel
Ib/lb
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
HC
g/lb
4.618
4.264
4 .222
5.806
103.2
5.316
4.534
4.673
CO
g/lb
367.94
140.88
74.77
179.69
524.73
127.79
77.27
289.44
NO,
g/lb
4.541
11.465
11.176
1.697
0.403
6.580
16.329
5.596
CO,
g/lb
831.1
1052.9
1131.7
884.6
1123.4
1230.6
1336.5
923.6
Mode g/hp-hr
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
224.6
127.7
62.8
23.0
0.1
40.0
91.4
152.4
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.547
0.510
0.533
0.727
NA
0.558
0.448
0.549
HC
g/hp— hr
2.525
2.174
2.252
4.221
NA
2.966
2.030
2.565
CO
g/hp— hr
201.20
71.81
39.89
130.59
NA
71.30
34.58
158.91
NO,
g/hp— hr
2.483
5.844
5.962
1.232
NA
3.672
7.308
3.072
CO,
g/hp-hr
454.4
536.7
603.7
642.9
NA
686.6
598.2
507.1
Weighted
Results
ICOMIA
BSO
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.584
•0.539
HC
g/hp-hr
5.841
4.131
CO
g/hp-hr
126.79
122.41
NOX
g/hp-hr
4.335
4.538
C0:
g/hp-hr
575.14
560.00
14
-------
Table 6.3:
Certification Fuel
ICOMZA and BSO Steady-State Teat |2 Reaulta
3-Mode Teat Points
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
3
Speed
% of Rated
Torque Weighting Factor Speed
* of WOT icOMIA
100 100 6%
80 71.6 14%
60 46.5 15%
40 25.3 25%
idle 0 40%
SO 35.4
70 58.6
90 85.3
BSO rPm
Torque
ft-lb HP
10% 4263 274.1 222.5
5% 3410 196.3 127.5
10% 2558 127.5 62.1
10% 1705 69.3 22.5
30% 700 0.0 0.0
10% 2132 97.0 39.4
20% 2984 160.6 91.2
5% 3837 210.5 153.8
Mode g/nr results
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
•7
8
HP
223.6
128.3
62.5
23.4
0.1
40.0
91.4
153.4
Fuel
Ib/hr
120.87
65.08
31.61
16.74
3.72
24.16
44.63
81.82
HC
g/hr
525.5
286.0
140.5
108.1
408.5
122.8
189.8
408.0
CO
g/hr
43,079
10,542
2,434
3,526
2,023
2,917
3,070
26,224
NO,
g/hr
585.8
687.6
379.7
25.4
0.0
137.8
646.2
404.2
CO,
g/hr
103, 425
67,981
39,190
17, 468
4,272
28,404
54,028
76,589
Mode g/lb fuel
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
- "• _-~
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
223.6
128.3
62.5
23.4
0.1
40.0
91.4
153.4
HP
223.6
128.3
62.5
23.4
0.1
40.0
91.4
153.4
Fuel
Ib/lb
NA
MA
NA
MA
NA
NA
NA
NA
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.540
0.507
0.506
0.716
NA
0.604
0.489
0.533
HC
g/lb
4.348
4.395
4 .445
6.458
109.8
5.083
4.253
4 .987
Mode g/hp— hr
HC
g/hp— hr
2.350
2.229
2.248
4.629
NA
3.071
2.077
2.659
CO
g/lb
356.41
161.99
77.00
210.63
543.82
120.74
68.79
320.51
NO,
g/lb
4.847
10.565
12.012
1.517
0.000
5.704
14.479
4.940
CO,
g/lb
855.7
1044.6
1239.8
1043.5
1148.4
1175.7
1210.6
936.1
CO
g/hp-hr
192.61
82.15
38.96
150.93
NA
72.95
33.61
170.93
NO,
g/hp-hr
2.619
5.358
6.076
1.087
NA
3.447
7.074
2.635
CO,
g/hp-hr
462.4
529.8
627.2
747.8
NA
710.4
591.4
499.2
Weighted
'Results
ICOMIA
BSO
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.574
0.545
HC
g/hp-hr
6.069
4.231
CO
g/hp-hr
131.13
122.57
NO,
g/hp-hr
4.175
4.406
CO,
g/hp-hr
593.38
566.70
15
-------
7. Clean Air Act Baseline Fuel Testing/Results
7.1 HP-FTP Transient Testing/Results
After the Crusader engine was torque mapped on this fuel, -wo
HD-FTP transient tests were run. No significant difference was
seen in between the power maps on Indolene and CAAB. Composite HC,
CO, and NOX levels were determined to be 10.232, 177.8, and :.200
g/hp-hr respectively. These results were only slightly diffarent
than those determined for the engine while operating on
certification fuel. The ethanol blends that will be discussed
later in this document were made from the CAAB fuel. For this
reason, all of the alternative fuels will be compared to this fuel
rather than to the certification fuel. The HD-FTP transient test
results for the CAAB fuel are presented in Table 7.1.
Table 7.1:
Clean Air Act Baseline Fuel
Heavy-Duty Gasoline Transient Test Results
HC
(g/hp-hr)
CO
(g/hp-hr)
NOX
(g/hp-hr)
BSFC
(Ib/hp-hr)
First Sequence
Cold Start
Hot Start #1
Hot Start #2
Composite*
9.872
10.110
10.495
10.076
176.0
174.7
176.8
174.9
3.206
3.140
3.141
3.149
0.599
0.598
0.597
0.598
Second Sequence
Cold Start
Hot Start #1
Hot Start #2
Composite*
9.956
10.459
10.622
10.387
180.7
180.6
179.8
180.6
Composite Average | 10.232
177.8
3.392
3.227
3.246
3.251
0.610
0.605
0.598
0.606
3.200
0.602
'Composite = 1/7(Cold Start) + 6/7(Hot Start #1)
16
-------
7.2 Steady-State (ICOMIA and BSO) Testing/Results
The steady-state procedure was run five times with this fuel.
The third test was due to a 7% inconsistency between the NOX
results for the first two runs. The forth and fifth tests are
discussed in Section 7.3. Composite HC, CO, and NOX results for
the first three tests were 5.917f 128.3, and 4.767 g/hp-hr
respectively for the ICOMIA, and composite HC, CO, and NO, results
were 4.065, 118.5, and 5.010 g/hp-hr for the BSO procedure. Again,
the steady-state results did not agree with the HD-FTP transient
results; HC and CO were much lower, and NOX was much higher. This
is not surprising since the transient test was developed for on-
highway vehicles while the two steady-state tests were developed
for marine vessels. The ICOMIA and BSO test results are presented
in Tables 7.4 to 7.6.
7.3 Sensitivity of Carburetor Calibration on Emissions
Before the marine engine was set-up at NVFEL, Crusader had
hired McLaren Engines to perform steady-state emission testing over
the ICOMIA and BSO steady-state marine test procedures. This test
program originated from the idea of a correlation program with
McLaren. However, based on the results from BSO testing at
McLaren, Crusader calibrated the carburetor for performance and
emissions. Therefore, the data obtained do not represent a
difference in the facilities, but the data do show the sensitivity
of carburetor calibration on emissions. In order to make an
appropriate comparison between McLaren and EPA facilities, the
steady-state modes were calculated using the manufacturer's rated
speed of 4400 RPM (as McLaren used) rather than the rated speed of
4263 RPM measured at NVFEL. These emission results are presented
in the following table:
Table 7.2:
Emission Results due to Carburetor Calibration
Test
Facility
McLaren
(before carburetor
calibration)
EPA
(after carburetor
calibration)
Test
Procedure
ICOMIA
BSO
ICOMIA
BSO
HC
(g/hp-hr)
3.791
4.539
. 5.354
3.686
CO
(g/hp-hr)
79.2
85.0
130.9
128.5
NOX
(g/hp-
hr)
9.461
8.368
4.595
4.542
By adjusting the fuel-air mixture, Crusader (based on the BSO
17
-------
cycle) reduced HC by 19% and NOX by 46% while increasing CO by 51%.
Over the ICOMIA cycle HC was seen to increase by 41%. This was due
to the 160% increase in HC at idle which the ICOMIA weights as 40%
of the emissions. For each of the other modes, a decrease c HC
was observed. Because the BSO only weights idle as 30% of the
total and because of the dramatic reduction in mode 7, a decrease
in HC was seen due to the carburetor adjustment for this _est
procedure. Modal data is presented in Table 7.3. EPA non-re .uced
steady-state data for these tests are presented in Tables 7 7 and
7.8.
Table 7.3:
McLaren and EPA Modal Results for Crusader Engine
Mode
1'
2*
3
4*
5
6*
7
8*
Speed
RPM
750
1760
2200
2640
3080
3520
3960
4400
Torque
ft-lb
0.0
73.4
102.4
132.7
169.7
207.2
247.2
289.6
HC g/hr
McLaren
150
116
147
187
224
285
2615
544
EPA
392
94
120
137
199
279
380
411
CO g/hr
McLaren
1490
2019
1226
1248
1322
4384
28887
34314
EPA
2304
3201
2629
2244
6300
13510
33222
41991
NOX g/hr
McLaren
0.0003
121
407
746
1240
1812
427
1287
EPA
0.75
43
215
510
692
738
317
605
* -The eight modes are presented in the order specified by the BSO
test procedure. The five modes marked with stars are the modes
specified in the ICOMIA test procedure.
18
-------
Table 7.4:
Clean Air Aot Ba««lin« Fu«l
ZCOMZA and BSO Steady-State Teat fl Re»ult»
8-Mode Teat Points
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Speed
i of Rated
Torque Weighting Factor Speed
% of WOT ICOMIA
100 100 6%
80 71.6 14%
60 46.5 15%
40 25.3 25%
idle 0 40*
50 35.4
70 58.6
90 85.3
BSO rPm
Torque
ft-lb HP
10% 4263 274.1 222.5
5% 3410 196.3 127.5
10% 2558 127.5 62.1
10% 1705 69.3 22.5
30% 700 0.0 0,0
10% 2132 97.0 39.4
20% 2984 160.6 91.2
5% 3837 210.5 153.8
Mode g/hr results
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
220.5
127.0
62.3
23.2
0.5
40.0
91.1
153.0
Fuel
Ib/hr
119.58
63.57
31.76
16.83
5.61
22.42
42.98
80.30
HC
g/hr
449.8
259.1
136.1
95.6
446.4
119.7
193.8
336.1
CO
g/hr
38,958
10, 748
2, 615
3,447
2,040
3,024
4,118
19,327
NO,
g/hr
684.3
722.4
442.0
33.1
3.9
150.9
705.7
607.9
CO,
g/hr
102,760
67, 959
42,268
16, 547
3, 624
27,394
57,419
77,004
Mode g/lb fuel
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
220.5
127.0
62.3
23.2
0.5
40.0
91.1
153.0
Fuel
Ib/lb
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
HC
g/lb
3.761
4.076
4.285
5.680
79
57
5.339
4.509
4.186
CO
g/lb
325.79
169.07
82.34
204.81
363.64
134.88
95.81
240.68
NO.
g/lb
5.723
11.364
13.917
1.967
0.695
6.731
16.419
7.570
CO,
g/lb
859.3
1069.0
1330.9
983.2
646.0
1221.9
1335.9
959.0
Mode g/hp-hr
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
220.5
127.0
62.3
23.2
0.5
40.0
91.1
153.0
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.542
0.500
0.510
0.725
NA
0.561
0.472
0.525
HC
g/hp— hr
2.040
2.040
2.184
4.119
NA
2.995
2.128
2.196
CO
g/hp— hr
176.67
84.61
41.98
148.59
NA
75.64
45.22
126.31
NO,
g/hp-hr
3.103
5.687
7.095
1.427
NA
3.774
7.749
3.973
CO,
g/hp— hr
466.0
535.0
678.5
713.3
NA
685.1
630.5
503.3
Weighted
Results
ICOMIA
BSO
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.589
0.545
HC
g/hp-hr
6.179
4.219
CO
g/hp-hr
127.67
115.63
NO,
g/hp-hr
4.715
5.075
CO,
g/hp-hr
596.12
578.11
19
-------
Table 7.5:
Clean Air Act Baaeline Fuel
ICOMZA and BSO Steady-State Teet |2 Result*
8-Mode Teat Points
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Speed
% of Rated
100
80
60
40
idle
50
70
90
Torque
% of WOT
100
71.6
46.5
25.3
0
35.4
58.6
85.3
Weighting Factor Speed
ICOMIA
6%
14%
15%
25%
40%
—
—
— —
BSO cPm
Torque
ft-lb HP
10% 4263 274.1 222.5
5% 3410 196.3 127.5
10% 2558 127.5 62.1
10% 1705 69.3 22.5
30% 700 0.0 0.0
10% 2132 97.0 39.4
20% 2984 160.6 91.2
5% 3837 210.5 153.8
Mode g/hr results
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
222.6
127.5
63.1
23.2
0.4
39.6
91.7
153.5
Fuel
Ib/hr
121.45
67.22
33.63
16.82
5.61
24.29
44.84
97.04
HC
g/hr
414 .0
271.0
139.2
104.2
419.6
124.7
196.1
397.2
CO
g/hr
37,383
11,586
2,517
3,633
2,409
2,945
4,222
28,872
NO,
g/hr
774.9
763.6
468.6
41.9
4.8
181.3
733.8
371.6
CO,
g/hr
103,129
70, 837
42,180
18,351
4, 585
29,504
57,899
74, 989
Mode g/lb fuel
Mode
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
222.6
127.5
63.1
23.2
0.4
39.6
91.7
153.5
Fuel
Ib/lb
NA
NA
NA
MA
NA
MA
NA
MA
HC
g/lb
3.409
4.032
4.139
6.195
74
.80
5.134
4.373
4.093
CO
g/lb
307.81
172.36
74.84
215.99
429.41
121.24
94.16
297.53
NO,
g/lb
6.380
11.360
13.934
2.491
0.856
7.464
16.365
3.829
CO,
g/lb
849.1
1053.8
1254.2
1091.0
817.3
1214.7
1291.2
772.8
Mode g/hp-hr
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
222.6
127.5
63.1
23.2
0.4
39.6
91.7
153.5
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.545
0.527
0.533
0.724
NA
0.614
0.489
0.632
HC
g/hp-hr
1.860
2.125
2.207
4.488
NA
3.151
2.139
2.588
CO
g/hp— hr
167.90
90.87
39.91
156.42
NA
74.40
46.05
188.09
NO.
g/hp-hr
3.480
5.988
7.430
1.805
MA
4.581
8.003
2.421
CO,
g/hp-hr
463.19
555.6
668.8
790.1
NA
745.5
631.4
488.5
Weighted
Results
ICOMIA
BSO
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.604
0.575
HC
g/hp-hr
5.952
4.132
CO
g/hp-hr
131.12
123.01
NOX
g/hp-hr
5.063
5.251
C0:
g/hp-hr
618.77
590.76
20
-------
Table 7.6:
Clean Air Aot Ba*aline Fuel
ICOMXA and BSO Steady-State Teat f3 Reaulta
8-Mode Teat Points
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
5
7
8
Spaed
% of Rated
100
80
60
40
idle
50
70
90
Torque Weighting Factor Speed
% of WOT ICOMIA
100 6%
71.6 14%
46.5 15%
25.3 25%
0 40%
35.4
58.6
85 . 3
BSO rPm
Torque
ft-lb HP
10% 4263 274.1 222.5
5% 3410 196.3 127.5
10% 2558 127.5 62.1
10% 1705 69.3 22.5
30% 700 0.0 0.0
10% 2132 97.0 39.4
20% 2984 160.6 91.2
5% 3837 210.5 153.8
Mode g/hr results
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
221.6
127.3
63.0
23.2 _,
0.5
39.8
91.0
154 .4
Fuel
Ib/hr
121.83
63.80
31.92
15.01
5.63
24.38
44.98
80.49
HC
g/hr
409.5
255.3
127.6
98.6
394.1
119.9
177.6 .
324.9
CO
g/hr
41, 128
10,352
2,327
3,294
1, 948
2,827
3,966
19,961
NO,
g/hr
584.4
737.0
419.6
32.3
3.3
152.5
654.2
570.5
CO,
g/hr
98,039
68, 801
40,303
16, 546
4,359
28,042
54, 844
77,027
Mode g/lb fuel
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
221.6
127.3
63.0
23.2
0.5
39.8
91.0
154.4
Fuel
Ib/lb
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
HC
g/lb
3.361
4.002
3.998
6.566
69.
99
4.916
3.949
4.036
CO
g/lb
337.58
162.25
72.89
219.47
345.97
115.96
88.18
248.00
NO,
g/lb
4.797
11.552
13.145
2.149
0.586
6.253
14.544
7.088
CO,
g/lb
804.7
1078.4
1262.6
1102.3
774.2
1150.2
1219.3
957.0
Mode g/hp-hr
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
221.6
127.3
63.0
23.2
0.5
39.8
91.0
154.4
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.550
0.501
0.507
0.647
NA
0.613
0.494
0.521
HC
g/hp-hr
1.848
2.005
2.027
4.249
NA
3.013
1.951
2.104
CO
g/hp-hr
185.65
81.28
36.95
142.01
NA
71.06
43.56
129.29
NO,
g/hp-hr
2.638
5.787
6.663
1.391
NA
3.832
7.184
3.695
CO,
g/hp— hr
442.5
540.2
640.0
713.2
NA
704 .8
602.3
498.9
Weighted
Results
ICOMIA
BSO
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.581
0.554
HC
g/hp-hr
5.620
3.844
CO
g/hp-hr
126.02
116.84
NO,
g/hp-hr
4.522
4.704
CO;
g/hp-hr
589.24
563.45
21
-------
Table 7.7:
Clean Air Act BM«lin« Fuel
ICOMZA «ad BSO Steady-State (Moiaren Mod**) Test f4 Re«ult«
8-Mode Test Points
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Speed Torque
% of Rated % of WOT
100 100
80 71.6
60 46.5
40 25.3
idle 0
50 35.4
70 58.6
90 85.3
Weighting Factor Speed
ICOMIA
6%
14%
15%
25%
40%
—
—
—
BSO rPm
Torque
ft-lb HP
10% 4400 289.6 242.6
5% 3520 207.2 138.9
10% 2640 132.7 66.7
10% 1760 73.4 24.6
30% 750 0.0 0.0
10% 2200 102.4 42.9
20% 3080 169.7 99.5
5% 3960 247.2 186.4
Mode g/hr results
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
224.2
138.3
67.1
25.5
0.9
43.1
99.9
185.1
Fuel
Ib/hr
127.14
69.35
35.61
16.86
5.62
24.34
48.64
104.64
HC
g/hr
423.5
278.9
139.3
99.0
386.3
120.2
185.9
369.7
CO
g/hr
42,023
13,576
2,297
3,140
2,310
2,611
5,110
31,895
NO,
g/hr
605.3
729.1
511.0
43.3
0.0
220.1
738.1
336.8
CO,
g/hr
99,884
71,176
44,147
17,213
4,587
30,279
56,645
73,015
Mode g/lb fuel
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
224.2
138.3
67.1
25.5
0.9
43.1
99.9
185.1
..'
Fuel
Ib/lb
MA
NA
NA
MA
NA
NA
NA
NA
HC
g/lb
3.331
4.021
3.911
5.869
68
.74
4.940
3.821
3.533
=
CO
g/lb
330.53
195.76
64.51
186.25
410.96
107.25
105.06
304.81
NO,
g/lb
4.761
10.514
14.351
2.567
0.000
9.043
15.174
3.219
CO,
g/lb
785.6
1026.3
1239.7
1020.9
816.2
1244.0
1164.6
697.8
====: TT:
Mode g/hp-hr
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
224.2
138.3
67.1
25.5
0.9
43.1
99.9
185.1
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.567
0.502
0.531
0.662
NA
0.564
0.487
0.565
HC
g/hp— hr
1.889
2.017
2.077
3.885
NA
2.787
1.860
1.997
CO
g/hp— hr
187.43
98.21
34.26
123.30
NA
60.51
51.14
172.31
NO,
g/hp— hr
2.700
5.274
7.621
1.700
MA
5.101
7.386
1.820
CO,
g/hp-hr
445.5
514.9
658.4
675.9
NA
701.8
566.9
394.5
Weighted
Results
ICOMIA
BSO
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.587
0.559
HC
g/hp-hr
5.333
3.642
CO
g/hp-hr
130.52
124.23
NO,
g/hp-hr
4.553
4.680
CO;
g/hp-hr
578.82
539.52
22
-------
Tabl* 7.8:
Clean Air Act. Baa*lin« Fuel
ZCOMZA and BSO Steady-State (McLaren Modes) Test f5 Results
8-Mode Teat Points
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
Speed
% of Rated
Torque Weighting Factor Speed
* ot WOT JCOMIA
100 100 6%
80 71.6 14%
60 46.5 15%
40 25.3 25%
idle 0 40%
50 35.4
70 58.6
90 85.3
BSO rPm
Torque
ft-lb HP
10% 4400 289.6 289.6
5% 3520 207.2 207.2
10% 2640 132.7 66.7
10% 1760 73.4 24.6
30% 750 0.0 0.0
10% 2200 102.4 42.9
20% 3080 169.7 99.5
5% 3960 247.2 186.4
| Mode g/hr results
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
224.0
138.4
66.8
25.0
0.4
44 .0
99.9
186.0
Fuel
Ib/hr
125.19
69.13
37.39
16.83
5.61
24.31
50.48
103.02
HC
g/hr
398.2
279.7
133.7
89.6
398.0
120.4
212.6
389.6
CO
g/hr
41, 958
13, 443
2, 191
3,261
2,298
2,646
7,489
34,548
NO,
g/hr
604.9
747.3
509.0
41.9
1.5
209.8
645.5
297.1
CO,
g/hr
102, 983
73, 612
43, 922
17,063
4,746
31,314
58,356
75,755
Mode g/lb fuel
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
224.0
138.4
66.8
25.0
0.4
44.0
99.9
186.0
Fuel
Ib/lb
NA
NA
HA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
HC
g/lb
3.181
4.046
3.576
5.322
70.
94
4.954
4.212
3.781
CO
g/lb
335.15
194.46
58.60
193.76
409.60
108.83
148.33
335.35
NO,
g/lb
4.832
10.811
13.613
2.491
0.271
8.631
12.787
2.884
CO,
g/lb
822.6
1064.8
1174.7
1013.8
845.9
1288.1
1156.0
735.3
Mode g/hp-hr
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
224.0
138.4
66.8
25.0
0.4
44.0
99.9
186.0
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.559
0.500
0.559
0.674
NA
0.553
0.506
0.554
HC
g/hp— hr
1.778
2.021
2.000
3.588
NA
2.738
2.129
2.094
CO
g/hp— hr
187.32
97.14
32.78
130.62
NA
60.16
74.99
185.70
NO,
g/hp— hr
2.701
5.400
7.614
1.680
NA
4.771
6.464
1.597
CO,
g/hp— hr
459.8
531.9
657.0
683.5
NA
712.0
584.4
407.2
Weighted
Results
ICOMIA
BSO
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.594
0.564
HC
g/hp-hr
5.375
3.729
CO
g/hp-hr
131.23
132.67
NOZ
g/hp-hr
4.637
4.403
CO.
g/hp-hr
593.69
554.51
23
-------
8. Low T-90 Fuel Testing/Results
8.1 HP-FTP Transient Testing/Results
Low T-90 fuel was blended from the CAAB fuel by adding 12%
MTBE. Composite transient test HC, CO, and NOX levels, for this
fuel, were determined to be 6.743, 162.3, and 3.163 g/hp-hr
respectively. This translates to reductions of 37% HC and 9% CO
and an increase of 23% NOX relative to CAAB. However, it is
important to stress here that the HD-FTP transient test was
designed for on-highway trucks. The marine cycles are probably
more representative of the actual use of this engine. For this
reason, reductions due to the oxygenated fuels are probably better
characterized by the steady-state marine cycles. Transient test
results are presented in Table 8.1.
Table 8.1:
Low T-90 Fuel
Heavy-Duty Gasoline Transient Test Results
HC
(g/hp-hr)
CO
(g/hp-hr)
NO,
(g/hp-hr)
BSFC
(Ib/hp-hr)
First Sequence
Cold Start
Hot Start #1
Hot Start #2
Composite*
7.617
6.742
6.822
6.867
166.0
163.3
164.3
163.7
3.252
3.143
3.142
3.159
0.599
0.566
0.572
0.571
Second Sequence
Cold Start
Hot Start #1
Hot Start #2
Composite*
7.320
6.501
6.710
6.618
156.8
161.5
163.0
160.8
3.460
3.117
3.179
3.166
0.577
0.566
0.573
0.568
Composite Average || 6.743
162.3
3.163
0.569
'Composite = 1/7(Cold Start) + 6/7(Hot Start fl)
24
-------
8.2 Steady-State (ICOMIA and BSO) Testing/Results
Due to the 15 % inconsistencies in both CO and NO. results
between the first and second steady-state tests, a third test was
run. All three tests were averaged to calculate the composite
results. The composite HC, CO, and NOX results for low T-90 fuel
over the ICOMIA cycle were 4.884, 112.7, and 4.966 g/hp-hr
respectively. As compared to the CAAB fuel, reductions of 17% HC
and 12% CO and an increase of 4% NOX were observed. Over the BSO
cycle, HC, CO, and NOS results were 3.431, 102.6, and 5.131 g/hp-
hr. The BSO showed reductions of 16% HC and 13% CO and a 2%
increase in NOS. No significant change in fuel consumption or
power was seen for this fuel. Differences between the ICOMIA and
BSO cycles were largely due to the different weighting factors for
the idle mode. These test results are shown in Tables 8.2-8.4.
25
-------
T«bl« S.2:
Low T-90 Fuel
ICOMIA and BSO Steady-State T««t f 1 Reault*
8-Mode Test Points
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Speed
% of Rated
Torque Weighting Factor Speed
* or WOT icOMIA
100 100 6%
80 71.6 14%
60 46.5 15%
40 25.3 25%
idle 0 40%
50 35.4
70 58.6
90 85.3
BSO rPm
Torque
ft-lb HP
10% 4263 274.1 222.5
5% 3410 196.3 127.5
10% 2558 127.5 62.1
10% 1705 69.3 22.5
30% 700 0.0 0.0
10% 2132 97.0 39.4
20% 2984 160.6 91.2
5% 3837 210.5 153.8
Mode g/hr results
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
241.0
127.1
62.4
23.0
0.1
40.1
90.8
152.9
Fuel
Ib/hr
119.89
63.69
31.85
14.98
5.61
24.32
43.03
84.20
HC
g/hr
492.9
285.2
136.4
108.3
318.2
121.8
168.8
380.7
CO
g/hr
41, 607
11, 161
1, 911
3,252
1,817
2,221
2,179
24,031
NO,
g/hr
579.9
.710.0
420.2
37.1
5.4
167.0
727.7
487.5
CO,
g/hr
100,436
68,340
39,088
17, 602
4,707
28,951
55,065
78, 954
Mode g/lb fuel
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
241.0
127.1
62.4
23.0
0.1
40.1
90.8
152.9
. M. ... — . ..
Fuel
Ib/lb
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
HC
g/lb
4.111
4.480
4.286
7.230
56
.72
5.008
3.923
4.521
CO
g/lb
347.04
175.24
60.00
217.09
323.89
91.32
50.64
285.40
NO,
g/lb
4.837
11.148
13.193
2.477
0.963
6.867
16.911
5.790
CO,
g/lb
837.7
1073.0
1227.3
1175.0
839.0
1190.4
1279.7
937.7
Mode g/hp-hr
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
241.0
127.1
62.4
23.0
0.1
40.1
90.8
152.9
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.497
0.501
0.510
0.650
NA
0.606
0.474
0.551
HC
g/hp-hr
2.045
2.244
2.185
4.700
NA
3.036
1.859
2.489
CO
g/hp-hr
172.61
87.81
30.63
141.19
NA
55.38
23.99
157.14
NO,
g/hp-hr
2.406
5.585
6.735
1.611
NA
4.164
8.010
3.187
CO,
g/hp-hr
416.7
537.7
626.5
764.1
NA
721.8
606.2
516.3
Weighted
Results
ICOMIA
BSO
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.567
0.534
HC
g/hp-hr
5.154
3.609
CO
g/hp-hr
124.15
110.98
N0r.
g/hp-hr
4.402
4.757
CO.
g/hp-hr
585.19
557.78
26
-------
Tmble 8.3:
Low T-90 Fuel
ICOMIA and BSO St«»dy-St«t« T««t #2 Reaulta
8-Mode Test Points
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Speed Torque
% of Rated % of WOT
100 100
80 71.6
60 46.5
40 25.3
idle 0
50 35.4
70 58.6
90 85.3
Weighting Factor Speed
ICOMIA
6%
14%
15%
25%
40%
—
—
—
BSO rPm
Torque
ft-lb HP
10% 4263 274.1 222.5
5% 3410 196.3 127.5
10% 2558 127.5 62.1
10% 1705 69.3 22.5
30% 700 0.0 0.0
10% 2132 97.0 39.4
20% 2984 160.6 91.2
5% 3837 210.5 153.8
Mode g/hr results
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
221.5
128.2
62.4
23.1
0.1
40.5
91.9
153.9
Fuel
Ib/hr
121.69
65.57
33.72
17.80
3.74
24.35
43.09
89.87
HC
g/hr
450.5
237.8
100.9
96.4
299.0
102.3
154.4
333.7
CO
g/hr
34,322
8,087
1,342
2,930
1,888
2,001
2,737
19, 989
NO,
g/hr
744.6
836.6
439.0
38.8
3.3
175.4
683.9
618.9
CO,
g/hr
101,138
70,538
39,765
18, 481
4, 732
29,041
54, 140
82,213
Mode g/lb fuel
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
221.5
128.2
62.4
23.1
0.1
40.5
91.9
153.9
Fuel
Ib/lb
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
HC
g/lb
3.702
3.627
2.992
5.416
79.
95
4.201
3.583
3.713
CO
g/lb
232.04
123.33
39.80
164.61
504.81
82.18
63.52
222.42
NO,
g/lb
6.119
12.759
13.019
2.180
0.882
7.203
15.871
6.887
CO,
g/lb
831.1
1075.8
1179.3
1038.3
1265.2
1192.6
1256.4
914.8
Mode g/hp-hr
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
221.5
128.2
62.4
23.1
0.1
40.5
91.9
153.9
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.549
0.512
0.541
0.771
NA
0.602
0.469
0.584
HC
g/hp-hr
2.034
1.855
1.618
4.179
NA
2.529
1.680
2.168
CO
g/hp-hr
154.93
63.10
21.52
126.98
NA
49.46
29.78
129.87
NO,
g/hp-hr
3.361
6.528
7.040
1.683
NA
4.336
7.439
4.021
CO,
g/hp-hr
456.5
550.4
637.6
800.9
NA
718.0
589.0
534 .1
Weighted
Results
ICOMIA
BSO
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.592
0.554
HC
g/hp-hr
4.721
3.333
CO
g/hp-hr
105.15
97.78
NOX
g/hp-hr
5.142
5.208
CO;
g/hp-hr
612.36
575.75
27
-------
T«bl« 8.4:
Low T-90 7u«l
ZCOMZA and BSD St««dy-3t*t« T««t f3 R««ulta
8-Mode Test Points
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
.8
Spaed
% of Rated
Torque Weighting Factor Speed
* 0£ WUT ICOMIA
100 100 6%
80 71.6 14%
60 46.5 15%
40 25.3 25%
idle 0 40%
50 35.4
70 58.6
90 85.3
BSO rPm
Torque
ft-lb HF
10% 4263 274.1 222 ;
5% 3410 196.3 12~ 5
10% 2558 127.5 *- .1
10% 1705 69.3 .2.5
30% 700 0.0 0.0
10% 2132 97.0 39.4
20% 2984 160.6 91.2
5% 3837 210.5 153.8
Mode g/hr results
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
221.6
127.3
62.8
23.2
0.6
40.2
90.9
153.3
Fuel
Ib/hr
123.49
65.53
35.57
16.84
5.61
24.32
48.65
84.20
HC
g/hr
446.3
244.9
110.1
85.3
309.1
101.2
163.1
266.0
CO
g/hr
35,612
8, 999
1,506
2,812
1,866
1,985
3,422
15,184
NO,
g/hr
799.3
835.6
482.9
40.5
4.6
183.8
699.5
618.9
CO,
g/hr
103, 900
69,462
43,988
16, 074
4,507
28,710
54,467
69,483
Mode g/lb fuel
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
8
HP
221.6
127.3
62.8
23.2
0.6
40.2
90.9
153.3
Fuel
Ib/lb
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
221.6
127.3
62.8
23.2
0.6
40.2
90.9
153.3
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.557
0.515
0.566
0.725
NA
0.605
0.535
0.549
HC
g/lb
3.614
3.737
3.096
5.065
55
10
4.161
3.352
3.159
=
Mode g/hp-hr
HC
g/hp-hr
2.014
1.924
1.753
3.673
NA
2.516
1.794
1.735
CO
g/lb
288.38
137.33
42.33
166.97
332.59
81.64
70.33
180.33
NO.
g/lb
6.472
12.751
13.576
2.046
0.815
7.558
14.379
7.351
CO,
g/lb
841.4
1060.0
1236.7
95-1.5
803.3
1180.5
1119.6
825.2
CO
g/hp— hr
160.69
70.72
23.96
121.07
NA
49.36
37.64
99.05
NO,
g/hp— hr
3.607
6.566
7.686
1.745
NA
4.570
7.695
4.038
CO,
g/hp-hr
468.8
545.9
700.1
692.1
NA
713.8
599.2
453.2
Weighted
Results
ICOMIA
BSO
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.609
0.579
HC
g/hp-hr
4.778
3.352
CO
g/hp-hr
108.88
98.92
NOS
g/hp-hr
5.353
5.429
CO;
g/hp-hr
609.26
572.58
28
-------
9. Gasohol Fuel Testing/Results
9.1 HP-FTP Transient Testing/Results
Gasohol is a 10% ethanol blend using CAAB fuel as the base
fuel. HD-FTP transient test results for HC, CO, and NOS were
determined to be 7.725, 139.1, and 3.926 g/hp-hr. This translates
to reductions of 25% HC and 22% CO and an increase of 23% NOX over
the CAAB fuel. For both the low T-90 fuel and the gasohol fuel, a
5% reduction in fuel consumption was observed on the transient
test. However, this effect on fuel consumption was not supported
by the steady-state tests specifically designed for marine
applications. Non-reduced transient test data on this fuel are
presented in Table 9.1.
Table 9.1:
Gasohol Fuel
Heavy-Duty Gasoline Transient Test: Results
HC
(g/hp-hr)
CO
(g/hp-hr)
NOX
(g/hp-hr)
BSFC
(Ib/hp-hr)
First Sequence
Cold Start
Hot Start #1
Hot Start f2
Composite*
8.941
7.718
7.635
7.893
151.2
138.9
138.8
140.7
3.851
4.084
3.714
4.051
0.590
0.572
0.568
0.575
Second Sequence
Cold Start
Hot Start #1
Hot Start f2
Composite*
8.735
7.363
7.395
7.559
147.1
135.9
138.8
137.5
3.640
3.827
3.795
3.800
0.588
0.562
0.566
0.566
Composite Average | 7 . 725
139.1
3.926
0.570
'Composite = 1/7(Cold Start) + 6/7(Hot Start #1)
29
-------
9.2 Steady-State {ICOMIA and BSO) Testing/Results
The steady-state test procedure was run twice on this fuel.
For the ICOMIA test procedure, composite HC, CO, and NOX levels
were determined to be 5.226, 97.9, and 4.679 g/hp-hr respectively.
According to the ICOMIA cycle, HC, CO, and NOX were reduced 12%,
24%, and 2% respectively. A NOS reduction was unexpected due to
the added oxygen in the fuel; however, it should be noted that the
2% increase is within the test to test variability. For the BSO
test procedure, composite HC, CO, and NOX levels were 3.561, 89.0,
and 4.818 g/hp-hr. The BSO showed reductions of 12% HC, 25% CO,
and 4% NOX. This was the only oxygenated fuel that did not show a
NOX increase over the Clean Air Act Baseline fuel. These results
are presented in Tables 9.2 and 9.3.
30
-------
Tabl* 9.2:
Gacohol Fuel
ZCOMZA and BSO Steady-State Te«t fl ReeultB
8-Mode Test Points
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
3
Speed
% of Rated
Torque Weighting Factor Speed
% of WOT ICOMIA
100 100 6%
80 71.6 14%
60 46.5 15%
40 25.3 25%
idle 0 40%
50 35.4
70 58.6
90 85.3
BSO rPm
Torque
ft-lb HP
10% 4263 274.1 222.5
5% 3410 196.3 127.5
10% 2558 127.5 62.1
10% 1705 69.3 22.5
30% 700 0.0 0.0
10% 2132 97.0 39.4
20% 2984 160.6 91.2
5% 3837 210.5 153.8
Mode g/hr results
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
222.2
126.6
62.6
22.8
0.7
39.4
90.9
153.2
Fuel
Ib/hr
121.03
67.07
33.54
16.76
5.58
24.19
46.52
85.60
HC
g/hr
436.0
262.0
111.0
99.4
383.6
106.4
154.0
321.1
CO
g/hr
30,879
9,138
1,163
2,263
1,756
1,519
2, 105
19,599
NO,
g/hr
705.7
731.6
379.1
32.0
3.6
146.1
618.4
525.7
CO,
g/hr
97,321
73, 154
43, 124
18,441
4,898
30, 955
58,217
80,709
Mode g/lb fuel
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
222.2
126.6
62.6
22.8
0.7
39.4
90.9
153.2
Fuel
Ib/lb
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
HC
g/lb
3.602
3.906
3.309
5.932
68
74
4.398
3.310
3.751
CO
g/lb
255.14
136.25
34.68
135.03
314.80
62.81
45.25
228.96
i
NO,
g/lb
5.831
10.908
11.302
1.909
0.647
6.041
13.294
6.141
CO,
g/lb
804.1
1090.7
1285.7
1100.3
877.8
1279.7
1251.4
942.9
Mode g/hp— hr
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
222.2
126.6
62.6
22.8
0.7
39.4
90.9
153.2
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.545
0.530
0.536
0.736
NA
0.614
0.512
0.559
HC
g/hp— hr
1.962
2.070
1.773
4.368
NA
2.702
1.695
2.096
CO
g/hp— hr
138.95
72.22
18.59
99.41
NA
38.59
23.17
127.91
NO,
g/hp— hr
3.175
5.782
6.057
1.406
NA
3.711
6.808
3.431
CO,
g/hp-hr
437.9
578.2
689.1
810.1
NA
786.2
640.9
526.8
weighted
Results
ICOMIA
BSO
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.606
0.569
HC
g/hp-hr
5.556
3.733
CO
g/hp-hr
98.61
88.99
N03
g/hp-hr
4.549
4.682
CO,
g/hp-hr
627.60
593.42
31
-------
Tabl* 9.3:
GMohol Fu«l
ICOMIA and BSO St«*dy-St»t« T*st §2 R««ult»
8 -Mode Teat Points
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Speed
% of Rated
Torque Weighting Factor Speed
* 0£ WOT ICOMIA
100 100 6%
90 71.6 14%
60 46.5 15%
40 25.3 25%
idle 0 40%
50 35.4
70 58.6
90 85.3
BSO rPm
Torque
ft-lb HP
10% 4263 274.1 222.5
5% 3410 196.3 127.5
10% 2558 127.5 62.1
10% 1705 69.3 22.5
30% 700 0.0 0.0
10% 2132 97.0 39.4
20% 2984 160.6 91.2
5% 3837 210.5 153.8
Mode g/hr results
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
224.1
127.1
62.1
23.1
0.6
39.8
91.4
153.8
Fuel
Ib/hr
122.89
65.25
33.54
16.76
1.86
24.21
46.55
85.65
HC
g/hr
439.4
252.0
103.2
94.9
317.7
104.5
150.7
323.8
CO
g/hr
33, 614
8,643
1,075
2,326
1,388
1,275
1,829
19,058
NO,
g/hr
792.2
766.4
389.1
34.1
5.4
147.0
652.0
547.7
CO,
g/hr
106, 111
73, 592
42,081
18,916
4, 120
30,500
59,275
81,606
Mode g/lb fuel
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
224.1
127.1
62.1
23.1
0.6
39.8
91.4
153.8
Fuel
Ib/lb
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
HC
g/lb
3.576
3.861
3.077
5.661
170.8
4.317
3.236
3.781
CO
g/lb
273.53
132.47
32.06
138.77
745.98
52.66
39.29
222.51
NO,
g/lb
6.446
11.745
11.600
2.038
2.881
6.073
14.006
6.395
CO,
g/lb
863.5
1127.9
1254.6
1128.6
2215.2
1259.8
1273.4
952.8
Mode g/hp-hr
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
224.1
127.1
62.1
23.1
0.6
39.8
91.4
153.8
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.548
0.513
0.540
0.727
NA
0.608
0.509
0.557
HC
g/hp— hr
1.961
1.982
1.663
4.114
NA
2.627
1.648
2.106
CO
g/hp-hr
150.01
68.00
17.33
100.85
NA
32.05
20.01
123.96
NO.
g/hp— hr
3.535
6.029
6.270
1.481
NA
3.696
7.133
3.563
CO,
g/hp— hr
473.5
579.0
678.2
820.2
NA
766.7
648.4
530.8
Weighted
Results
ICOMIA
BSO
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.569
0.551
HC
g/hp-hr
4.895
3.389
CO
g/hp-hr
97.19
88.95
NOX
g/hp-hr
4.809
4.954
CO;
g/hp-hr
630.61
602.47
32
-------
10. Higher Ethanol Blends—Transient Tests
The engine was operated on fuels with increasing amounts of
ethanol in order to observe the effects of higher ethanol blends on
engine operation and emissions. Increasing increments of 10%
ethanol were used to determine the engine's potential for operating
on ethanol blends. For each of these blends, two hot starts were
run. Even at 40% ethanol (the highest blend that was run) , no
significant change in power was observed.
Cold starts were not initially run on the Crusader engine due
to concerns that leaving the ethanol fuel in the engine over night
may cause some corrosion damage to the carburetor and fuel pump.
The cold start had little effect on the emission results for the
Indolene, CAAB, low T-90, and gasohol runs. Therefore, it was
assumed that hot starts only would be enough to characterize
transient operation. Using a forced cool method, a cold start was
run with the 30% blend. No significant changes in the composite
results were seen.
Increased ethanol in the fuel tended to decrease HC and CO and
increase NOS from the Crusader engine over the transient cycle.
However, HC increased slightly and NOX decreased slightly when the
blend was moved from 30% to 40% ethanol. The steady-state tests
are probably more appropriate for observing the effects of ethanol
on the operation of a marine engine.
Steady-state tests were run for the 30% and 40% blends. The
20% blend did not seem interesting because of the engine's ability
to operate on much higher blends. The transient testing results
for these three ethanol blends are shown in Tables 10.1-10.3.
Table 10.1: 20% Ethanol Blend
Heavy-Duty Gasoline Transient Test Results
HC
(g/hp-hr)
CO
(g/hp-hr)
NOX
(g/hp-hr)
BSFC
(Ib/hp-hr)
Hot Start #1
Hot Start #2
7.476
7.598
133.5
136.9
4.199
4.381
0.558
0.567
Average
7.537
135.2
4.290 ][_ 0.563
33
-------
Table 10.2: 30% Ethanol Blend
Heavy-Duty Gasoline Transient Test Results
HC
(g/hp-hr)
CO
(g/hp-hr)
NOX
(g/hp-hr)
BSFC
(Ib/hp-hr)
Cold Start
Hot Start #1
Hot Start #2
5.346
6.008
6.176
73.7
81.1
81.8
6.155
5.998
6.071
0.535
0.530
0.533
Composite Average*
5.913
80.0 1 6.020 1 0.531
'Composite = 1/7(Cold Start) + 6/7(Hot Start
Table 10.3: 40% Ethanol Blend
Heavy-Duty Gasoline Transient Test Results
HC
(g/hp-hr)
CO
(g/hp-hr)
NOX
(g/hp-hr)
BSFC
(Ib/hp-hr)
Hot Start #1
Hot Start #2
6.082
6.575
64.9
63.4
6.019
5.882
0.512
0.505
Average
6.323
64.2
5.951 1 0.509
34
-------
11. 30% Ethanol Blend Testing/Results
11.1 HP-FTP Transient Testing/Results
This fuel was blended from the CAAB fuel by adding 30%
ethanol. For this transient test, a choke mechanism was hooked up
to the engine. As recommended by Crusader, the choke was wired
open for all of the other tests. Composite transient test HC, CO,
and NOS levels, for this fuel, were determined to be 5.164, 76.0,
and 5.814 g/hp-hr. Compared to operating the engine with the choke
wired open on the 30% ethanol blend, reductions in HC, CO, NO,, and
BSFC were 13%, 5%, 3%, and 3% respectively. These changes were
mostly due to reductions in the hot start results. This was
unusual since the choke mechanism was not expected to affect hot
start performance. Emissions increased during the cold starts as
a result of the choke mechanism. Transient test results are
presented in Table 11.1.
Table 11.1:
30% Ethanol Blend (with Choke Mechanism)
Heavy-Duty Gasoline Transient Test Results
HC
(g/hp-hr)
CO
(g/hp-hr)
NO,
(g/hp-hr)
BSFC
(Ib/hp-hr)
First Sequence
Cold Start
Hot Start #1
Hot Start #2
Composite*
5.698
5.050
4.990
5.142
79.0
77.7
75.6
77.9
5.895
5.905
5.676
5.904
0.533
0.520
0.514
0.522
Second Sequence
Cold Start
Hot Start #1
Hot Start 12
Composite*
6.451
4.974
5.030
5.185
78.1
73.3
75.0
74.0
5.530
5.756
5.780
5.724
0.528
0.505
0.519
0.508
Composite Average
5.164
76.0 J| 5.814 1 0.515
'Composite = 1/7(Cold Start) + 6/7(Hot Start #1)
35
-------
11.2 Steady-State (ICOMIA and BSO) Testing/Results
Two steady-state tests (with the choke wired open) were run
using the 30% blend. The composite HC, CO, and NOS results for
this fuel over the ICOMIA cycle were 3.201, 34.4, and 6.847 g/hp-hr
respectively. As compared to the CAAB fuel, reductions of 46% HC
and 73% CO and an increase of 44% NOX were observed. Over the BSO
cycle, HC, CO, and NOS results were 2.109, 35.3, and 6.787 g/hp-hr.
The BSO showed reductions of 45% HC and 79% CO and a 46% increase
in NOS. No significant change in power was seen for this fuel.
Fuel consumption increased slightly (2% for ICOMIA, 4% for BSO) .
These test results are shown in Tables 11.2 and 11.3.
36
-------
T«bl« 11.2:
30% Ethanol Bland Fu«l
ICOM1A and BSO 3t««dy-3t«t« T««t fl R«»ult»
8-Mode Test Points
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Speed
% of Rated
Torque Weighting Factor Speed
% of WOT ICOMIA
100 100 6%
80 71.6 14%
60 46.5 15%
40 25.3 25%
idle 0 40%
50 35.4 —
70 58.6
90 85.3
BSO rPm
Torque
ft-lb HP
10% 4263 274.1 222.5
5% 3410 196.3 127.5
10% 2558 127.5 62.1
10% 1705 69.3 22.5
30% 700 0.0 0.0
10% 2132 97.0 39.4
Z0% 2984 160.6 91.2
5% 3837 210.5 153.8
— i — • i H ' ..".— -^ ^ ••^^^— i _.^___1^_^_
Mode g/hr results
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
221.3
127.1
61.8
23.1
0.4
40.4
91.4
153.2
Fuel
Ib/hr
118.57
64.84
33.35
16.66
7.42
25.97
51.91
81.62
HC
g/hr
235.4
82.1
51.0
44.5
230.0
48.4
59.6
162.5
CO
g/hr
12700
807
173
186
916
97
209
4048
NO,
g/hr
1721.8
1165.9
308.2
57.4
11.1
143.0
653.6
1281.3
CO,
g/hr
113,614
75,423
41, 628
18,853
6,549
31, 541
59,756
89,329
Mode g/lb fuel
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
221.3
127.1
61.8
23.1
0.4
40.4
91.4
153.2
Fuel
Ib/lb
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
HC
g/lb
1.985
1.265
1.529
2.668
31.
00
1.863
1.147
1.990
CO
g/lb
107.11
12.45
5.18
11.16
123.45
3.75
4.03
49.60
NO,
g/lb
14.521
17.981
9.240
3.447
1.501
5.507
12.591
15.698
"" -....- . .
CO,
g/lb
958.2
1163.2
1248.2
1131.6
882.7
1214.5
1151.1
1094.4
Mode g/hp— hr
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
221.3
127.1
61.8
23.1
0.4
40.4
91.4
153.2
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.536
0.510
0.540
0.723
NA
0.643
0.568
0.533
HC
g/hp-hr
1.064
0.646
0.825
1.927
NA
1.198
0.652
1.060
CO
g/hp— hr
57.38
6.35
2.79
8.06
NA
2.41
2.29
26.42
NO,
g/hp— hr
7.779
9.172
4.986
2.490
NA
3.541
7.150
8.363
CO,
g/hp-hr
513.3 1
593.4
673.5
817.5
NA
780.9
653.7
583.0
Weighted
Results
ICOMIA
BSO
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.612
0.587
HC
g/hp-hr
2.947
1.954
CO
g/hp-hr
28.39
27.95
NOX
g/hp-hr
7.166
7.148
CO;
g/hp-hr
668.94
636.83
37
-------
Table 11.3:
30% Ethanol Blend Tumi
ICOMXA and BSO Steady-State Test §2 Results
8-Mode Teat Points
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Speed
% of Rated
100
80
60
40
idle
50
70
90
Torque
% of WOT
100
71.6
46.5
25.3
0
35.4
58.6
85.3
Weighting Factor Speed
ICOMIA
6%
14%
15%
25%
40%
—
—
—
BSO rPm
Torque
ft-lb HP
10% 4263 274.1 222.5
5% 3410 196.3 127.5
10% 2558 127.5 62.1
10% 1705 69.3 22.5
30% 700 0.0 0.0
10% 2132 97.0 39.4
20% 2984 160.6 91.2
5% 3837 210.5 153.8
Mode g/hr results
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
219.7
127.8
62.5
23.4
0.5
39.7
90.8
153.0
Fuel
Ib/hr
122.50
64.96
35.27
16.70
3.71
24.11
48.23
83.37
HC
g/hr
290.8
100.2
47.4
43.4
277.9
47.1
54.9
181.9
CO
g/hr
20487
1057
139
243
1058
124
210
6922
NO.
g/hr
1464.0
1077.0
315.7
46.1
14.7
143.2
640.4
930.2
CO,
g/hr
111,209
73, 895
40,421
17,274
5, 161
31,804
57,081
77,867
Mode g/lb fuel
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
219.7
127.8
62.5
23.4
0.5
39.7
90.8
153.0
Fuel
Ib/lb
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
HC
g/lb
2.374
1.542
1.343
2.600
74
.91
1.954
1.138
2.182
CO
g/lb
167.24
16.28
3.93
14.53
285.10
5.14
4.35
83.03
NO.
g/lb
11.951
16.579
8.951
2.762
3.960
5.940
13.278
11.157
CO,
g/lb
907.8
1137.5
1146.1
1034.4
1391.0
1319.1
1183.5
934.0
Mode g/hp— hr
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
219.7
127.8
62.5
23.4
0.5
39.7
90.8
153.0
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.558
0.509
0.564
0.71S
NA
0.607
0.531
0.545
HC
g/hp-hr
1.324
0.784
0.757
1.859
NA
1.185
0.605
1.189
CO
g/hp— hr
93.25
8.28
2.22
10.39
NA
3.12
2.31
45.24
NO.
g/hp— hr
6.663
8.430
5.048
1.974
NA
3.603
7.054
6.078
CO,
g/hp-hr
506.2
578.4
646.4
739.5
NA
800.2
628.8
508.9
weighted
Results
ICOMIA
BSO
ssrc
Ib/hp-hr
0.589
0.569
HC
g/hp-hr
3.455
2.262
CO
g/hp-hr
40.49
42.73
NOX
g/hp-hr
6.527
6.427
CO;
g/hp-hr
633.95
607.50
38
-------
12. 40% Ethanol Blend Testing/Results
12.1 HP-FTP Transient Testing/Results
No on-highway transient tests were run using the 40% ethanol
blend. HD-FTP testing was performed on the more common fuels only
so that the emissions from marine engines could be compared to the
emissions automotive engines on an identical test cycle. The
marine steady-state cycles are believed to be more appropriate for
determining potential reductions from oxygenated fuel being used in
a marine engine.
12.2 Steady-State (ICOMIA and BSO) Testing/Results
The steady-state test procedure was run three times on this
fuel. For the ICOMIA test procedure, composite HC, CO, and NO,
levels were determined to be 3.226, 26.8, and 6.974 g/hp-hr
respectively. According to the ICOMIA cycle, HC and CO were
reduced 46% and 79% while NO2 was increased 46%. For the BSO test
procedure, composite HC, CO, and NOS levels were 2.050, 25.1, and
6.250 g/hp-hr. The BSO showed reductions of 50% HC, and 79% CO,
and an increase of 25% NOr. According to the BSO procedure, the
40% blend showed less NOX than the 30% blend. This may have been
due to lower combustion temperatures because of significantly less
combustion material in modes 6 of all three tests and mode 7 of the
second and third tests. The steady-state results for the 40%
ethanol blend are presented in Tables 12.1-12.3.
39
-------
T«bl« 12.1:
40% Ethanol Blend Fuel
XCOMZA and BSO Steady-State Teat f1 Result*
8-Modc Teat Points
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
3
^=
Speed
% of Rated
Torque Weighting Factor Speed
* of WOT ICOMIA
100 100 6%
80 71.6 14%
60 46.5 15%
40 25.3 25%
idle 0 40%
50 35.4
70 58.6
90 85.3
BSO rPm
Torque
ft-lb HP
10% 4263 274.1 222.5
5% 3410 196.3 127.5
10% 2558 127.5 62.1
10% 1705 69.3 22.5
30% 700 0.0 0.0
10% 2132 97.0 39.4
20% 2984 160.6 91.2
5% 3837
210.5 153.8
Mod* g/hr results
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
HP
220.6
127.3
61.6
23.2
0.4
40.2
91.9
153.4
HP
220.6
127.3
61.6
23.2
0.4
40.2
91.9
153.4
Fuel
Ib/hr
117.15
70.70
33.51
16.75
9.3
37.19
55.79
83.52
-— — ~ -~" T*
M
Fuel
Ib/lb
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
HC
g/hr
221.1
80.1
49.6
66.3
472.3
61.4
52.9
173.7
~"
ode g/ Ib f ue
HC
g/lb
1.887
1.133
1.481
3.956
50
78
L 1.652
0.948
2.079
CO
g/hr
9452
878
182
342
1439
159
263
4319
• i— in. a —^
1
CO
g/lb
80.68
12.41
5.44
20.41
154.75
4.27
4.72
51.72
NO.
g/hr
1626.4
1083.7
253.9
67.2
6.9
112.9
563.5
1285.4
CO,
g/hr
109,462
74,013
41, 511
21,394
3,548
30,301
59,339
93,035
NO,
g/lb
13.883
15.328
7.578
4.011
0.740
3.036
10.100
15.391
CO,
g/lb
934.4
1046.9
1238.8
1277.2
381.5
814.8
1063.6
1113.9
Mode g/hp-hr
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
220.6
127.3
61.6
23.2
0.4
40.2
91.9
153.4
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.531
0.556
0.544
0.721
NA
0.925
0.607
0.545
HC
g/hp-hr
1.002
0.629
0.805
2.853
NA
1.529
0.575
1.132
CO
g/hp— hr
42.82
6.90
2.96
14.71
NA
3.96
2.86
28.16
NO,
g/hp— hr
7.368
8.516
4.122
2.893
NA
2.810
6.131
8.381
CO,
g/hp-hr
495.9
581.6
673.8
921.1
NA
754.0
645.6
606.6
Weighted
Results
ICOMIA
BSO
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.646
0.628
HC
g/hp-hr
5.132
3.052
CO
g/hp-hr
29.80
26.20
NO,
g/hp-hr
6.635
6.547
CO;
g/hp-hr
646.89
619.29
40
-------
Table 12.2:
40% Bthanol Blend Fu*l
ICOMZA and BSO Steady-Stat* T*«t §2 Result*
8 -Mode Teat Points
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
g
7
8
Speed
* of Rated
Torque Weighting Factor Speed
* °* WOT ICOMIA
100 100 6%
80 71.6 14%
60 46.5 15%
40 25.3 25%
idle 0 40%
50 35.4 —
70 58.6
90 85.3
BSO rPm
Torque
ft-lb HP
10% 4263 274.1 222.5
5% 3410 196.3 127.5
10% 2558 127.5 62.1
10% 1705 69.3 22.5
30% 700 0.0 0.0
10% 2132 97.0 39.4
20% 2984 160.6 91.2
5% 3837 210.5 153.8
Mode g/hr results
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
220.2
127.0
62.0
23.0
0.4
39.1
91.3
153.0
Fuel
Ib/hr
120.72
66.86
35.29
20.43
7.42
31.55
55.65
85.28
HC
g/hr
199.3
58.9
54.1
45.4
152.9
46.5
45.2
170.6
CO '
g/hr
10143
727
158
222
1038
142
244
4834
NO,
g/hr
1748.0
1163.6
220.3
77.6
9.5
116.6
496.0
1249.5
C02
g/hr
112, 950
77,965
36,471
21,668
4,721
31,287
56,813
90,867
Moda g/lb fuel
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
=
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
220.2
127.0
62.0
23.0
0.4
39.1
91.3
153.0
HP
220.2
127.0
62.0
23.0
0.4
39.1
91.3
153.0
Fuel
Ib/lb
MA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.548
0.526
0.569
0.887
NA
0.806
0.610
0.557
HC
g/lb
1.651
0.881
1.532
2.224
20.
61
1.474
0.812
2.000
=5=====:=::=::!=^^^=
Mode g/hp-hr
HC
g/hp— hr
0.905
0.464
0.872
1.973
NA
1.188
0.495
1.115
CO
g/lb
84.02
10.87
4.47
10.87
139.92
4.50
4.38
56.68
CO
g/hp— hr
46.08
5.72
2.55
9.64
NA
3.63
2.67
31.59
NO,
g/lb
14.480
17.404
6.243
3.798
1.280
3.696
8.913
14.652
NO,
g/hp— hr
7.942
9.160
3.554
3.370
NA
2.979
1.437
8.166
CO,
g/lb
935.6
1166.1
1033.5
1061.6
575.6
991.7
1020.9
1065.5
CO,
g/hp-hr
513.2
613.7
588.2
941.5
NA
799.5
622.8
593.9
Weighted
Results
ICOMIA
BSO
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.491
0.625
HC
g/hp-hr
2.183
1.510
CO
g/hp-hr
26.08
25.52
NOX
g/hp-hr
7.013
6.570
CO;
g/hp-hr
655.67
618.55
41
-------
Table 12.3:
40% Ethanol Bland Fuel
ICOMIA and BSO St««dy-St»t« Teat |3 Re«ult»
8-Mode Teat Points
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
=
Speed
% of Rated
Toro^e Weighting Factor Speed
S 0£ WOT ICOMIA
100 100 6%
80 71.6 14%
60 46.5 15%
40 25.3 25%
idle 0 40%
50 35.4
70 58.. 6
90 85.3
Mode g/hi
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
221.9
126.5
62.6
23.1
0.4
39.6
90.8
153.4
Fuel
Ib/hr
115.29
66.98
35.37
16.75
7.44
33.49
53.93
89.09
BSO rPm
Torque
ft-lb HP
10% 4263 274.1 222.5
5% 3410 196.3 127.5
10% 2558 127.5 62.1
10% 1705 69.3 22.5
30% 700 0.0 0.0
10% 2132 97.0 39.4
20% 2984 160.6 91.2
5% 1 3837 [ 210.5 153.8
: results
HC
g/hr
194.0
67.4
56.4
43.3
173.0
43.2
48.0
158.0
CO
g/hr
9376
620
180
213
1004
139
251
3927
NO,
g/hr
1900.4
1182.6
230.9
71.9
12.1
101.6
104.6
1264.8
CO,
g/hr
124,408
79,229
39,955
|_ 21,185
4,414
30,170
24,484
89,094
Mode g/lb fuel
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
HP
221.9
126.5
62.6
23.1
0.4
39.6
90.8
153.4
Fuel
Ib/lb
NA
NA
HA
NA
MA
NA
NA
NA
HC
g/lb
1.682
1.006
1.596
2.586
23
.25
1.288
0.889
1.773
CO
g/lb
81.32
9.25
5.09
12.73
134.91
4.16
4.65
44.08
NO,
g/lb
16.483
17.656
6.529
4.294
1.625
3.034
1.939
14.197
C02
g/lb
1079.1
1182.9
1129.6
1264.8
593.3
900.9
454.0
1000.0
Mode g/hp-hr
Mode
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
HP
221.9
126.5
62.6
23.1
0.4
39.6
90.8
153.4
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.519
0.529
0.565
0.726
NA
0.846
0.594
0.581
HC
g/hp-hr
0.874
0.533
0.902
1.878
NA
1.090
0.528
1.030
CO
g/hp-hr
42.24
4.90
2.88
9.25
NA
3.52
2.76
25.61
NO,
g/hp— hr
8.563
9.346
3.690
3.119
NA
2.568
1.152
8.246
CO,
g/hp-hr
560.6
626.2
638.4
918.6
NA
762.3
269.7
580.9
Weighted
Results
ICOMIA
BSO
BSFC
Ib/hp-hr
0.621
0.611
HC
g/hp-hr
2.364
1.589
CO
g/hp-hr
24.41
23.42
NO*
g/hp-hr
7.273
5.634
CO,
g/hp-hr
682.13
540.53
42
-------
13. Effects of Transience on Emissions from Marine Engine
13.1 Transient ICOMIA Cycles
In order to observe the effects of transience on emissions
from this marine engine, three transient duty cycles were created
from the ICOMIA 5-mode steady-state cycle. These test cycles were
similar to those presented at the July 30, 1992 Marine Workshop by
the National Marine Manufacturers Association (NMMA) in which
Michigan Automotive Research Corporation (MARCO) ran the modes of
the ICOMIA together in correct order, then in reverse order, over
different time intervals. The engine spend the same percentage of
its time in each operation mode as is defined by the ICOMIA
weighting factors for calculating composite emissions. Three
different speeds were used in this test program in order to
simulate different levels of transience. The "low transience
ICOMIA" is shown in Figure 13.1.
•d
rt
jj
a
QJ
o
QJ
ft
OS
o
QJ
QJ
ft
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Time (seconds)
Figure 13.1: Low Transience ICOMIA Test Cycle (One 16-Minute Series)
For the medium transience ICOMIA, this step cycle is repeated
4 times in the 16 minutes. The high transience cycle repeats 16
times in 16 minutes. As the transience increased, both the engine
43
-------
and the dynamometer had increasing difficulty in following the
cycle. One bag per test was used to sample the emissions over each
cycle.
13.2 Transient ICOMIA Test Results
As the amount of transience in the duty cycle increased, the
engine showed some interesting results. For HC, CO, and BSFC, the
highest results were when transience was maximized and the lowest
results were during the steady-state test. However, for NOX, the
highest emissions were from the steady-state ICOMIA and the lowest
emissions were from the low transience ICOMIA. As was expected, HC
increased as transience increased, however CO and BSFC were
measured to be lower (and NOX higher) over the medium than the low
transience ICOMIA.
These tests show that, for this engine, adding transience to
the ICOMIA has a large effect on HC, CO, and NOX/ and some effect
on BSFC. There was no evidence that the amount of transience added
to the cycle affects CO, NOS, or BSFC. The results of these tests
are presented in Tables 13.1-13.3.
Table 13.1: CAAB Fuel
No Transience ICOMIA (Steady-State) Test Results
Steady-State fl
Steady-State #2
Steady-State #3
Average
HC
(g/hp-hr)
6.179
5.952
5.620
5.917
CO
(g/hp-hr)
127.7
131.1
126.0
128.3
NOX
(g/hp-hr)
4.715
5.063
4.522
4.767
BSFC
(Ib/hp-hr)
0.589
0.604
0.581
' 0.591
Table 13.2: CAAB Fuel
Low Transience ICOMIA (One 16-Min. Series) Test Results
Hot Start #1
Hot Start 12
Average
HC
(g/hp-hr)
7.689
7.906
7.798
CO
(g/hp-hr)
183.1
185.8
184.5
NO,
(g/hp-hr)
3.151
3.108
3.130
BSFC
(Ib/hp-hr)
0.603
0.607
0.605
44
-------
Table 13.3: CAAB Fuel
Medium Transience ICOMIA (Four 4-Min. Series) Test Results
Hot Start #1
Hot Start f2
Average
HC
(g/hp-hr)
8.254
8.347
8.301
CO
(g/hp-hr)
171.1
172.2
171.7
NOT
(g/hp-hr)
3.395
3.661
3.528
BSFC
(Ib/hp-hr)
0.595
0.597
0.596
Table 13.4: CAAB Fuel
High Transience ICOMIA (Sixteen 1-Min. Series) Test Results
Hot Start #1
Hot Start #2
Average
HC
(g/hp-hr)
9.025
9.310
9.168
CO
(g/hp-hr)
188.9
200.0
194.5
NOX
(g/hp-hr)
3.343
3.653
3.498
BSFC
(Ib/hp-hr)
0.614
0.648
0.631
45
-------
14. Effects of Alcohols on FID Measurements of HC
A flame ionization detector (FID) was used to measure
hydrocarbons in the exhaust from the Crusader engine. Unburned
oxygenates may cause the FID to underestimate HC in the exhaust;
however, no correction in the calibration of the FID was made for
this test program. The underestimation of HC is small for the low
T-90 fuel and the gasohol fuel (about 3%), but becomes larger for
the higher ethanol blends.
In Table 14.1, the second column presents the percent of
alcohol in the exhaust and is based on other in-house testing of
oxygenated fuels. Carbon atoms are underestimated by the FID, for
this part of the exhaust, due to its oxygen content. According to
tests run on automobile engines, this underestimation is about 22%
for MTBE and 27% for ethanol1. By taking this into effect and by
accounting for the oxygen molecules which are not detected by the
FID, the third column in Table 14.1 was generated. These
correction factors can be used to multiply to the HC measurements
for the alternative fuels in order to approximate the adjustment
that should have been made for the oxygenated fuels.
Because these correction factors were not derived using the
FID used in this test program, they are not applied to any of the
hydrocarbon emission data in this report. However, if the were
applied, the qualitative results would not change significantly.
For example, the reduction in HC due to 40% ethanol being blended
into CAAB fuel would be 39% with the correction factor rather than
45% as reported in this paper. In either case, a large reduction
in HC is seen.
Table 14.1: Approximate Effects of Alcohols on HC Results
Fuel
Low T-90 (12% MTBE)
Gasohol (10% Eth.)
20% Ethanol Blend
30% Ethanol Blend
40% Ethanol Blend
Alcohol in Exhaust
3.0%
2.8%
5.6%
8.4%
11.2%
HC Correction Factor
1.03
1.03
1.06
1.09
1.12
1 Smith, Lawrence R., Characterization of Exhaust Emissions
from Alcohol-Fueled Vehicles, Southwest Research Institute, May
1985.
46
-------
15. Analysis and Conclusions
Emission data were collected from a Crusader 350 marine
inboard engine, prototype, heavy-duty gasoline engine. This engine
was operated over the HD-FTP on-highway transient test, the ICOMIA
5-mode marine steady-state test, and the BSO marine steady-state
test using several fuels. These fuels included Indolene, CAAB, low
T-90, gasohol, and several ethanol blends up to 40% ethanol. The
transient test was only run to compare marine technology with on-
highway technology/ there is no implication that the HD-FTP test
procedure can accurately represent marine engine usage or the
emissions from a marine engine.
The Crusader engine was first operated on two baseline fuels:
certification fuel (Indolene) and Clean Air Act Baseline fuel
(CAAB). The marine engine seemed to operate about the same on both
fuels. Over the transient cycles, less than a 4% difference was
seen for HC and CO, and no significant difference was seen for NOX
and fuel consumption. For the marine steady-state cycles, HC, CO,
and BSFC were within a 3% difference; however NOX had a difference
of more than 10%. All of the oxygenated fuels were mixed from the
CAAB fuel.
Emission standards for heavy-duty gasoline engines for 1991
(based on the HD-FTP transient test procedure) are 1.1 g/hp-hr HC,
14.4 g/hp-hr CO, and 5.0 g/hp-hr NOX. This marine engine would
only be able to meet the NOX requirement. However, it should be
noted that the emission standards are based on after-catalyst
exhaust while the results presented in this report are engine-out.
Emissions data for the Indolene and CAAB fuel are presented in
Table 15.1 and Table 15.2.
Table 15.1
Emissions Summary for Crusader 350 Marine Inboard Engine
Certification Fuel
HD-FTP, Transient
ICOMIA, Steady-State
BSO, Steady-State
HC
(g/hp-hr)
9.878
5.955
4.181
CO
(g/hp-hr)
184.4
129.0
122.5
NOX
(g/hp-hr)
3.225
4.255
4.472
BSFC
(Ib/hp-hr)
0.597
0.579
0.542
47
-------
Table 15.2
Emissions Summary for Crusader 350 Marine Inboard Engine
Clean Air Act. Baseline Fuel
HD-FTP, Transient
ICOMIA, Steady-State
BSOf Steady-State
HC
(g/hp-hr)
10.232
5.917
4.065
CO
(g/hp-hr)
177.8
128.3
118.5
NOX
(g/hp-hr)
3.200
4.767
5.010
BSFC
(Ib/hp-hr)
0.602
0.591
0.558
In order to observe the sensitivity of the emissions to
carburetor calibration, the steady-state modes were adjusted to
match those used when the Crusader engine was tested by McLaren
Engines. Crusader used the data from McLaren to calibrate its
carburetor for performance and emissions before sending it to EPA.
The rated speed was measured at EPA to be 4243 RPM while McLaren
used the manufacturer's rated speed of 4400 RPM. Based on the
ICOMIA, Crusader was able to reduce NO, while paying a penalty in
HC and CO. However, Crusader reduced HC by an order of magnitude
at 90% of rated speed which is not seen in the ICOMIA procedure.
Therefore, the BSO procedure shows a reduction in HC and NOX with
a penalty in CO only. The effects of the calibration changes are
presented in Table 15.3.
Table 15.3
Changes in Emissions due to Carburetor Calibration
(Using McLaren Modes for Correlation)
Clean Air Act Baseline Fuel
ICOMIA, Steady-State
BSO, Steady-State
HC
(g/hp-hr)
41.2%
-18.8%
CO
(g/hp-hr)
65.3%
51.2%
NOX
(g/hp-hr)
-51.4%
-45.7%
The Crusader marine engine was tested with one methyl
tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) blend and several ethanol blends of
fuel. HC and CO were reduced with the MTBE (low T-90) fuel with
only a small increase in NOS and no change in BSFC. The results
indicated that as the percentage of ethanol was increased from 0%
to 40%, HC and CO decreased and NOX increased. This was expected
because of known effects of leaning out the fuel-air mixtures.
Fuel consumption also increased slightly. The engine seemed to run
well on the 40% ethanol blend and showed no significant change in
48
-------
power as compared to the baseline fuel. Although the engine ran
well on 40% ethanol blend, there is some concern that durability
problems may arise in the long term due to materials compatibility
problems.
Non-reduced data for the oxygenated fuel tests are presented
in Tables 15.4 to 15.7. Table 15.8 shows the reductions over CAAB
fuel for the various alcohol blends when tested on the ICOMIA
cycle.
Table 15.4
Emissions Summary for Crusader 350 Marine Inboard Engine
Low T-90 Fuel
HD-FTP, Transient
ICOMIA, Steady-State
BSO, Steady-State
HC
(g/hp-hr)
6.743
4.884
3.431
CO
(g/hp-hr)
162.3
112.7
102.6
NO,
(g/hp-hr)
3.163
4.966
5.131
BSFC
(Ib/hp-hr)
0.569
0.589
0.556
Table 15.5
Emissions Summary for Crusader 350 Marine Inboard Engine
Gasoho1 Fuel
HD-FTP, Transient
ICOMIA, Steady-State
BSO, Steady-State
HC
(g/hp-hr)
7.725
5.226
3.561
CO
(g/hp-hr)
139.1
97.9
89.0
NO,
(g/hp-hr)
3.926
4.679
4.818
BSFC
(Ib/hp-hr)
0.570
0.588
0.560
Table 15.6
Emissions Summary for Crusader 350 Marine Inboard Engine
30% Ethanol Blend
HD-FTP, Transient
ICOMIA, Steady-State
BSO, Steady-State
HC
(g/hp-hr)
5.913
3.201
2.109
CO
(g/hp-hr)
80.0
34.4
35.3
NOX
(g/hp-hr)
6.020
6.847
6.787
BSFC
(Ib/hp-hr)
0.531
0.601 !
0.578
49
-------
Table 15.7
Emissions Summary for Crusader 350 Marine Inboard Engine
40% Ethanol Blend
HD-FTP, Transient*
ICOMIA, Steady-State
BSO, Steady-State
HC
(g/hp-hr)
6.323
3.226
2.050
CO
(g/hp-hr)
64.2
26.8
25.1
NOX
(g/hp-hr)
5.951
6.974
6.250
BSFC
(Ib/hp-hr)
0.509
0.639
0.621
Hot Starts only
Table 15.8
Emissions Summary for Crusader 350 Marine Inboard Engine
Alcohol Blends on ICOMIA Test Procedure
CAAB (0% alcohol)
Low T-90
(12.5% MTBE)
Gasohol
(9.5% ethanol)
30% Ethanol Blend
40% Ethanol Blend
HC
(g/hp-hr)
5.917
4.884
(-17%)
5.226
(-12%)
3.201
(-46%)
3.226
(-45%)
CO
(g/hp-hr)
128.3
113
(-12%)
97.9
(-24%)
34.4
(-73%)
26.8
(-79%)
NOX
(g/hp-hr)
4.767
5.0
(+4%)
4.679
(-2%)
6.847
(+44%)
6.974
(+46%)
BSFC
(Ib/hp-hr)
0.591
0.591
(0%)
0.588
(-1%)
0.601
(+2%)
0.639
( + 8%)
I
03
§
-100
&
10 20 30
Percent Ethanol in Fuel Blend
Figure 15.1: Effects of Ethanol in Fuel
50
-------
Three transient marine tests were developed from the ICOMIA
cycle by running the modes together at three different frequencies.
These tests show that, for this engine, adding transience to the
ICOMIA has a large effect on HC, CO, and NOX, and some effect on
BSFC. Although HC increased with increased transience, there was
no evidence that the amount of transience added to the cycle
affects CO, NOX, or BSFC. The results of these tests are presented
in Table 15.9.
Table 15.9
Emissions Summary for Crusader 350 Marine Inboard Engine
Effects of Added Transience to ICOMZA Cycle (CAAB Fuel)
Test Cycle
(versions of ICOMIA)
No Transience
Low Transience
Medium Transience
High Transience
HC
(g/hp-hr)
5.917
7.798
8'. 301
9.168
CO
(g/hp-hr)
128.3
184.5
171.7
194.5
NO,
(g/hp-hr)
4.767
3.130
3.528
3.498
BSFC
(Ib/hp-hr)
0.591
0.605
0.596
0.631
This test program gives some insight into the characterization
of baseline emissions for a new marine inboard engine as well as
potential emission reductions through the use of oxygenated fuels.
As the percentage of alcohol in the fuel increased, HC and CO
decreased and NOX increased. This was expected due to known
effects of leaning out the fuel-air mixtures. There was no
significant change in power, but fuel consumption increased
"slightly.
EPA compared its results with the data from McLaren that
Crusader used to calibrate its carburetor. NOX was reduced but CO
increased. HC was observed to increase on the ICOMIA procedure and
decrease on the BSO procedure.
Finally, adding transience to the ICOMIA cycle increased HC,
CO, and BSFC and decreased NOX results. Only HC seemed to be
affected by the amount of transience added.
51
-------
Appendices
A Non-Reduced Transient Test Data
B Non-Reduced Steady-State Test Data
C Fuel Specifications
-------
A. Non-R*duc«d Transient T«at Data
-------
H0920129
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB CS1F
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 07/21/92 TIME: 13:34:46 PAGE:
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920129
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HO GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D103
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
TEST CONDITIONS:
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER350MAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 7-21-92 9:15
Processing Tine: 07/21/92 13:34:43
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 13923 TIM DAVIS
Barometer: 29.28 -HG
Dew Point Temperature: 59.0 F
Dry Bulb Temperature: 74.6 F
Humidity (Aba.):
Humidity (Rel.):
NOx Corr. Factor:
76.39 grains H20/lbs. dry air
58.30 %
1.0066
One Bag Only
SEGMENT LENGTH ACT BHP-HR REF BHP-HR * DIET
TEST OPTIONS:
Cold Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type: 6 IND UNLEADED, 91 OCX
Alpha(H/C Ratio): 1.8500
Fuel Specific Gravity: .7416
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel: 6.1770
COMMENTS:
COLD START I 1 FULL E/M
VALIDATION CHECKS:
CONGRATULATIONS!
THIS TEST PASSED CYCLE PERFORMANCE (GAS REGULATIONS)!
: Torque I BHP standard errors are validated by the Dlgalog.
01
02
03
04
TOT
248
243
302
316
315
1.421
3.666
10.008
1.391
16.486
363
.635
,937
,367
16.302
4.26
.85
.71
1.76
1.13
•Remark: COLD START I 1 FULL E/M"
SPEED SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST RSQUARE NSIZE SHIFT
01
02
03
04
TOT
28.775
34.771
24.576
27.295
29.292
1.01406
1.01073
1.00805
1.01342
1.00868
-5.925
-3.861
-1.842
-5.403
-.929
.99823
.99875
.99892
.99777
.99928
248
243
302
316
315
.8
.8
.8
.8
.8
TORQUE SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST RSQUARE NSIZE SHIFT
01
02
03
04
TOT
8.518%
6.658%
4.974%
4.889%
6.374%
.95684
.94357
.96074
.95548
.96484
1.003
1.825
2.446
.934
1.326
.91009
.95624
.97695
.96722
.96779
243 .8
307 .8
302 .8
315 .8
273 .8
CO
ft
HP
SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST RSQUARE NSIZE SHIFT
01
02
03
04
TOT
3.858%
3.990%
4.111%
2.257%
3.699%
1.03101
.98816
.97305
.99150
.99310
.111
.486
1.888
.238
.498
.95154
.97725
.98182
.97973
.98463
243
243
302
315
273
.8
.8
.8
.8
.8
HD-920129
IB CS1F
999 CRUSAOKH350MAR92 0
DATE: 07/21/92 TIME: 13:34:47 HD-920129
-------
HD920129
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB CS1F
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 07/21/92 TIME: 13:34:4? PAGE:
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
Bag 1 NLLN CS
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Cms/
Bhphr
9.984
HC —
Cms/
Kw-Hr
13.389
Grams
164.600
Cms/
Bhphr
185.485
LU -
Cms/
Kw-Hr
248.739
Grams
3057.910
Cms/
Bhphr
548.94
*M£ -
Gras/
Kw-Hr
736.14
Grams
9049.66
Cms/
Bhphr
3.435
WUA •
Cms/
Kw-Hr
4.606
Grams
56.630
Gals
Bag 1 NLLN CS 1.616
Measured Fuel Flow: CS
— Fuel
Lbs/
Lbs Bhphr
9.983 .606
1.730 Gals 10.686 Lbs
BAG DETAIL REPORT
Bag I 1
Length
Bhp-Hr
Dllut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
•
BSFC
NLLN CS
1167. SEC.
16.486
16.608
1174.0 Sec.
36080
1
Cu.Ft.
616 Gal.
5.11 L.
9.98 Lb. 4528.1 Gm
.606 Lb/Bhp-Hr
368.62 Gra/Kw-Hr
- --Dm-ivuittjuriy tAttrtuai CUKHt.1. 1 tu
SITE EMISSION
A202 MEAS
A202 MEAS
A009 MEAS
A009 MEAS
HC
CO
C02
NOX
RNG DEFL.
19
22
23
17
.1
.2
2.1
.0
CONC.
3.17
13.87
.038
.00
RNG
19
22
23
17
DEFL.
9.0
33.3
26.3
11.6
CONC.
282.35
2583.66
.520
28.79
CONCENTRATION
279.37
2570.63
.484
28.79
PPMC
PPM
%
PPM
GRAMS
164.60
3057.91
9049.86
56.63
UMS/
BHP-HR
9.984
185.485
548.942
3.435
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow Difference
CS 9.983 10.686 -6.581
IB CS1F
999 CRUSADER3bOMAR92 0
DATE: 07/21/92 TIME: 13:34:47 HD-920129
-------
HD920130
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB HS1F
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 01/21/92 TIME: 13:53:43 PAGE: 1
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920130
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HO GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: 0101
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER350MAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
TEST CONDITIONS:
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.):
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type:
Alpha(H/C Ratio):
Fuel Specific Gravity:
Lias Fuel/Gals Fuel:
COMMENTS:
HOT START I 1 FULL E/M
VALIDATION CHECKS:
CONGRATULATIONS!
THIS TEST PASSED CYCLE PERFORMANCE (GAS REGULATIONS)!
: Torque t BHP standard errors are validated by the Dlgjlog.
29.28 -HG
52.8 F
75.1 f
60.19 grains H20/lbs. dry air
44.90 %
.9374
One Bag Only
6 IND UNLEADED, 91 OCX
1.8500
.1416
6.1770
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 7-21-92 9:54
Processing Time: 07/21/92 13:53:40
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 13923 TIM DAVIS
SEGMENT LENGTH
ACT BHP-HR REF BHP-HR
01
02
03
04
TOT
248
242
301
316
315
1.388
3.662
10.003
1.380
16.434
,363
.635
.937
.367
16.302
% DIFF
1.83
.74
.66
.95
.81
•Remark: HOT START t 1 FULL E/M"
SPEED SEG STD.ERR SLOPE
Kl
n
CONST KSQUARE NS1ZE SHIFT
H-
t*
H-
O
I
TORQUE
HP
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
28.
34.
24.
26.
28.
STD.
5.
6.
4.
4.
5.
STD.
2.
3.
3.
2.
3.
302
612
104
981
931
ERR
167%
635%
632%
859%
452%
ERR
526%
908%
863%
215%
322%
1
1
1
1
1
.01237
.00965
.00687
.01254
.00753
SLOPE
.95570
.94416
.95831
.95010
.96434
SLOPE
.98115
.98853
.91041
.98180
.99001
-5.
-3.
-1.
-5.
238
891
595
586
-.830
CONST
.
1.
2.
1.
962
174
672
971
336
CONST
.
2.
293
460
026
241
517
.99828
.99876
.99896
.99782
.99930
RSQUARE
.96591
. 95661
.97985
.96728
.97623
RSQUARE
.97745
.97819
.98383
.9(1036
.98751
248
242
301
316
315
NSIZE
242
307
301
315
273
NSIZE
242
242
301
315
273
.8
.8
.8
.8
.8
SHIFT
.8
.8
.8
.8
.8
SHIFT
.8
.8
.8
.8
.8
CO
ft
5
HD-9201JO
IB HS1F
999 CRUSADEK350MAR92 0
DATE: 07/21/92 TIME: 13:53:44 HD-920130
-------
HD920130
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB HS1F
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 07/21/92 TIME: 13:53:44 PAGE:
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
Cms/
Bhphr
HC
Cms/
Ku-Hr
Bag 1 NLLN HS 10.060 13.491
Grams
165.320
Cms/
Bhphr
— CO
Cms/
Kw-Hr
184.037 246.798
Grams
3024.460
Cms/
Bhphr
C02
Cms/
Kw-Hr
538.04 721.53
Grains
8842.19
NOx
Cms/ Gras/
Bhphr Kw-Hr
3.116 4.181
Grams
51.240
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Gals
Bag 1 NLLN HS 1.S87
Measured Fuel Flow: HS
-- Fuel
Lbs/
Lbs Bhphr
9.804 .597
1.670 Gals 10.316 Lbs
BAG DETAIL REPORT
Bag I 1
Length
Bhp-Hr
Dllut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
•
BSFC
NLLN HS
1167. SEC.
16.434
16.802
1172.0 Sec.
35990. Cu.Ft.
SITE EMISSION
A009 MEAS HC
A202 MEAS CO
A009 MEAS C02
A009 MEAS NOX
1.587 Gal. 6.00 L.
9.80 Lb. 4446.8 Gm
.597 Lb/Bhp-Hr
363.14 Gm/Kw-Hr
o/«-rwji«juiMu LAimuDi >~uniUA.i[.u ons/
RNG DEFL.
16
22
23
17
2.6
.0
2.3
.0
CONC.
7.83
.00
.042
.00
RNG
16
22
23
17
DEFL.
96.2
32.9
26.0
11.3
CONC.
288
2548
28
.66
.87
.514
.04
CONCENTRATION
281
2548
28
.30
.87
.474
.04
PPMC
PPM
%
PPM
GRAMS
165.32
3024.46
8842.19
51.24
BHP-HR
10.060
184.037
538.042
3.118
H-
O
0
1
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow Difference
HS 9.804 10.316 -4.96%
HO-9201JO
IB HS1F
999 CRUSADEK3bOMAJW2 0
DATE: 07/21/92 TIME: 13:53:45 HD-920130
-------
HD920131
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB HS2F
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 07/21/92 TIME: 14:12:26 PAGE:
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920131
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HO GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D101
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER350MAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
29.27 "HG
54.5 F
76.0 F
64.78 grains H20/lbs. dry air
47.30 %
.9541
One Bag Only
TEST CONDITIONS:
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.):
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type: 6 IND UNLEADED, 91 OCT
Alpha(H/C Ratio): 1.8500
Fuel Specific Gravity: .7416
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel: 6.1770
COMMENTS:
HOT START I 2 FULL E/M
VALIDATION CHECKS:
CONGRATULATIONS!
THIS TEST PASSED CYCLE PERFORMANCE (GAS REGULATIONS)!
: Torque ( BHP standard errors are validated by the Dlgalog.
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 7-21-92 10:33
Processing Time: 07/21/92 14:12:24
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 13923 TIM DAVIS
SEGMENT LENGTH ACT BHP-HR REF BHP-HR % DIFF
1.17
.69
.42
.88
.58
•Remark: HOT START I 2 FULL E/M'
SPEED SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST RSQUARE NSI2E SHIFT
01
02
03
04
TOT
248
240
300
316
315
1.379
3.660
9.979
1.379
16.397
1.363
3.635
9.937
1.367
16.302
TORQUE
HP
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
28.
34.
24.
27.
29.
STD.
5.
6.
4.
4.
5.
STD.
2.
3.
3.
443
641
536
313
172
ERR
203%
715%
785%
933%
534%
ERR
.575%
,982%
,976%
1
1
1
1
1
.01138
.00848
.00604
.01127
.00650
SLOPE
.94919
.94379
.96143
.95185
.96353
SLOPE
2.273%
3.394%
.98275
.98699
.97182
.98756
.98882
-5
-3
-1
-5
-
.057
.500
.930
.087
.608
CONST
1
1
2
1
.080
.816
.363
.923
.328
CONST
1
.298
.484
.822
.228
.496
.998>26
.99875
.99692
.99776
.999129
RSQUARE
.96507
.95549
.97666
.96643
.97548
RSQUARE
.97650
.97734
.98293
.97933
.98694
248
240
300
316
315
NSI2E
240
307
300
315
273
NSIZE
240
240
300
315
273
.8
.8
.8
.8
.8
SHIFT
.8
.8
.8
.8
.8
SHIFT
.8
.8
.8
.8
.8
u>
n
*
H-
H-
O
H-
8
2
H
HD-920131
IB HS2F
999 CRUSADt:R3
-------
HD920131
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB HS2F
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 0//21/92 TIME: 14:12:28 PAGE:
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
Cms/
Bhphr
HC
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Bag 1 NLLN HS 9.596 12.668
Grams
157.350
Cms/
Bhphr
— CO
Cms/
Kw-Hr
181."719 243.689
Grains
2979.640
Cms/
Bhphr
C02
Cms/
Kw-Hr
539.02 122.84
Grams
8838.30
Cms/
Bhphr
NOx
GUIS/
Kw-Hr
3.132 4.200
Grams
51.350
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Fuel
Lbs/
Bhphr
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN HS 1.516 9.734 .594
Measured Fuel Flow: HS 1.650 Gals 10.192 Lbs
BAG DETAIL REPORT
Bag I 1 NLLN HS
Length
Bhp-Hr
Ollut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
•
BSFC
1167. SEC.
16.397
17.064
1173.0 Sec.
36070. Cu.Ft.
1.576 Gal.
SITE EMISSION
A009 MEAS HC
A202 MEAS CO
A009 MEAS C02
A009 MEAS NOX
5.95 L.
9.73 Lb. 4415.5 Gm
.594 Lb/Bhp-Hr
361.32 Gm/Kw-Hr
!
H-
H-
O
H-
§
Dm-ivijNuuHU tAtmuoj I.UIUVA.IC.U uno/
RNG DEFL.
16
22
23
17
2.3
.0
2.0
.0
CONC.
6.93
.00
.037
.00
RNG
16
22
23
17
DEFL.
91.4
32.4
25.7
11.1
CONC.
273
2505
27
.66
.52
.507
.55
CONCENTRATION
267
2505
27
.14
.52
.473
.55
PPMC
PPM
I
PPM
GRAMS
157.35
2979.64
8838.30
51.35
BHP-HR
9.596
181.719
539.019
3.132
CO
r*
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow Difference
HS 9.735 10.192 -4.49%
Jl
IB HS2F
999 CRUSADttt3bOMAR92 0
DATE: 07/21/92 TIME: 14:12:28 HD-920131
-------
H0920U2
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB CS2F
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 07/22/92 TIME: 13:03:13 PAGE:
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920132
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HD GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D103
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER350MAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
TEST CONDITIONS:
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.C
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Cold Start Only .
Manual Zero and Span
Digalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type:
Alpha(H/C Ratio):
Fuel Specific Gravity:
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel:
COMMENTS:
COLD START I 2 FULL E/M
VALIDATION CHECKS:
CONGRATULATIONS!
THIS TEST PASSED CYCLE PERFORMANCE (GAS REGULATIONS)!
: Torque I BHP standard errors are validated by the Dlgalocj.
29.31 "HG
58.0 F
74.3 F
73.58 grains H2O/lbs. dry air
56.80 %
.9933
One Bag Only
6 IND UNLEADED, 91 OCT
1.8500
.7416
6.1770
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT -
Test Date/Time: 7-22-92 8:50
Processing Time: 07/22/92 13:03:10
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 13923 TIM DAVIS
SEGMENT LENGTH ACT BHP-HR REF BHP-HR % DIFF
01
02
03
04
TOT
246
243
302
316
315
1.423
3.674
9.997
1.388
16.483
363
635
937
367
4.40
1
1
.07
.60
.54
16.302
1.11
•Remark: COLD START I 2 FULL E/M"
SPEED SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST RSQUARE NS1ZE SHUT
TORQUE
HP
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
28.
34.
24.
27.
29.
STD.
7.
6.
4.
5.
6.
STD.
3.
3.
3.
2.
3.
792
814
617
477
326
ERR
834%
714%
841%
071%
20£%
ERR
685%
980%
959%
311%
620%
1
1
1
1
1
.01442
.01153
.00877
.01363
.00941
SLOPE
.95332
.94309
.95601
.95132
.96227
SLOPE
1
.02381
.98912
.96895
.98874
.99124
-6
-4
-2
-5
-1
.416
.486
.197
.122
.462
CONST
1
1
2
1
.136
.848
.681
.914
.392
CONST
2
.190
.487
.075
.233
.537
.99823
.99875
.99892
.99775
.99928
RSQUARE
.92236
.95548
.97793
.96452
.96926
RSQUAPE
.95499
.97740
.98298
.97864
.98521
248
243
302
316
315
NSIZE
243
307
302
315
273
NSIZE
243
243
302
315
273
.8
.8
.8
.8
.8
SHIFT
.a
.8
.8
.8
.8
SHIFT
.8
.8
.8
.8
.8
&
H-
H-
O
o
D
I
O
o
5
HD-920132
IB CS2F
999 CRUSADt:i(.)'jOMAH92 0
DATE: 07/22/92 TIME: 13:03:14 HD-920132
-------
HD920132
999 CRUSADER3SOMAR92 0
IB CS2F
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 07/22/92 TIME: 13:03:14 PAGE:
Bag
FUEL
Bag
Gms/ Cms/
Bhphr Kw-Hr Grams
1 NLLN CS 9.963 13.361 164.220
CONSUMPTION:
Lbs/
Gals Lbs Bhphr
1 NLLN CS 1.615 9.978 .605
Measured Fuel Flow: CS 1.710 Gals 10
Bag » 1 NLLN CS
Length 1167. SEC.
Bhp-Hr 16.483
Dllut. Factor 16.628
Bag Fill Time 1170.0 Sec.
Exh. Volume 35980. Cu.Ft.
Fuel Con sump. 1.615 Gal. 6.10
• 9.98 Lb. 4525.9
BSFC .605 Lb/Bhp-Hr
• 368.01 Gm/Kw-Hr
l,U CU^ WUA
Cms/ Cms/ Gms/ Gms/ Cms/ Gms/
Bhphr Kw-Hr Grams Bhphr Kw-Hr Grains Bhphr Kw-Hr Grams
186.570 250.194 3075.230 547.05 733.60 9016.96 3.354 4.498 55.280
.563 Lbs
BAG DETAIL REPORT
SITE EMISSION RNG DEFL. CONC. RNG DEFL. CONC. CONCENTRATION GRAMS BHP-HR
A202 MEAS HC 19 .2 6.33 19 9.1 285.46 279.50 PPMC 164.22 9 963
A202 MEAS CO 22 .0 .00 22 33.4 2592.38 2592.38 PPM 3075.23 186 570
A009 MEAS C02 23 2.0 .037 23 26.2 .518 .484 % 9016.96 547 046
A009 MEAS NOX 17 .1 .25 17 11.6 28.79 28.56 PPM 55.28 3.354
L.
Gm
o
H
It
H-
*
14,
^^
O
It
H*
§
3
•
H
C?
H
0.
CO
rt
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow Difference
CS 9.978 10.563 -5.541
HD-920132
IB CS2F
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
DATE: 01/22/92 TIME: 13:03:14 HD-920132
-------
HD920133
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB HS3F
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 01/22/92 TIME: 14:11:06 PAGE:
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Te ' No.: HD-920133
Te*i Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HO GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: 0103
Oyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
TEST CONDITIONS:
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER350MAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.):
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type:
Alpha(H/C Ratio):
Fuel Specific Gravity:
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel:
COMMENTS:
HOT START I 3 FULL E/M
VALIDATION CHECKS:
CONGRATULATIONS!
THIS TEST PASSED CYCLE PERFORMANCE (GAS REGULATIONS)!
: Torque I BMP standard errors are validated by the Dlgalog.
29.31 "HG
57.9 F
77.8 F
73.31 grains H20/lbs. dry air
50.40 %
.9921
One Bag Only
6 IND UNLEADED, 91 OCT
1.8500
.7416
6.1770
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 7-22-92 9:28
Processing Time: 07/22/92 14:11:03
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 13923 TIM DAVIS
SEGMENT LENGTH ACT BHP-HR REF BHP-HR
% DIFF
01
02
03
04
TOT
248
242
300
316
315
"Remark: HOT START i
SPEED
TORQUE
HP
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
STD.ERR
18.868
23.281
21.471
17.861
20.881
STD.ERR
2.952%
3.958%
3.041%
2.545%
3.232%
STD.ERR
1.354%
2.393%
2.554%
1 .169%
2.050%
1.388
3.669
9.994
1.386
16.437
1
3
9
1
16
.363
.635
.937
.367
.302
1.83
.94
.57
1.39
.83
3 FULL E/M"
SLOPE
1.01349
1.01052
1.00746
1.01386
1.00820
SLOPE
.96906
.96203
.96712
.96724
.97401
SLOPE
.99489
.99726
.97909
.99814
.99525
CONST
-5.791
-4.595
-1.936
-6.596
-1.143
CONST
.704
1.281
2.059
.747
1.003
CONST
.201
.297
1.530
.170
.379
RSQUARE
.99924
.99944
.99917
.99905
.99964
RSQUARE
.98892
.98466
.99137
.991.11
.99169
RSQUARE
.99352
.99166
.99299
.99455
.99526
NSIZE
248
242
300
316
315
NSIZE
242
307
300
315
273
NSIZE
242
242
300
315
273
SHIFT
. 8
.8
.8
.8
.8
SHIFT
.8
.8
.8
.8
.8
SHIFT
.a
.8
m
n
&
M-
n
H-
g
I
O
ft
U
ft
HO-920133
IB HS3F
999 CRUSAOt:imOMAR92 0
DATE: OV/22/92 TIME: 14:11:06 HD-920133
-------
H0920133
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB HS3F
HEAV* DUTV GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 07/22/92 TIME: 14:11:06 PAGE: 2
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
Cms/
Bhphr
HC
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Bag 1 NLLN HS 9.665 12.961
Grams
158.960
Cms/
Bhphr
— CO
Cms/
Kw-Hr
184.310 247.164
Grants
3029.510
Cms/
Bhphr
C02
Cms/
Kw-Hr
535.55 718.19
Grams
8602.87
Cms/
Bhphr
— NOx
Cms/
Kw-Hr
3.276 4.393
Grams
53.840
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Gals
Bag 1 NLLN HS 1.581
Measured Fuel Flow: HS
Bag I 1 NLLI
Length
Bhp-Hr
Dllut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
•
BSFC
— Fuel
Lbs/
Lbs Bhphr
9.768 .594
1.670 Gals 10.316 Lbs
BAG DETAIL REPORT
H-
n
H-
§
•4 HS
1167.
16.437
17.154
1172.0
36050.
1.581
9.77
.594
361 . 32
SEC.
Sec.
Cu.Ft.
Gal. 5.97 L.
Lb. 4430.5 Gm
Lb/Bhp-Hr
Gm/ Kw-Hr
SITE
A009
A202
A009
A009
EMISSION
MEAS HC
MEAS CO
MEAS C02
MEAS NOX
BACKGROUND
RHG DEFL. CONC.
16 1.6 4.88
22 .0 .00
23 1.6 .029
17 .0 .00
EXHAU
RNG DEFL.
16 91.5
22 32.9
23 25.3
17 11.2
i i
CONC
274.
2548.
27.
44
87
499
80
CORRECTED
CONCENTRATION
269.85 PPMC
2548.87 PPM
.471 %
27.80 PPM
GRAMS
158.86
3029.51
8802.87
53.84
CMS/
BHP-HR
9.665
184.310
535.552
3.276
CD
5
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow Difference
HS 9-H8 10.316 -s.3
HD-920133
IB HS3F
999 CRUSADLR3SOMAR92 0
DATE: 07/22/92 TIME: 14:11:06 HD-920133
-------
HD920134
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB HS4F
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 07/22/92 TIME: 13:21:03 PAGE: 1
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920134
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HD GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D103
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER350MAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
TEST CONDITIONS:
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.):
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type:
Alpha(H/C Ratio):
Fuel Specific Gravity:
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel:
COMMENTS:
HOT START I 4 FULL E/M
VALIDATION CHECKS:
CONGRATULATIONS!
THIS TEST PASSED CYCLE PERFORMANCE (GAS REGULATIONS)!
cCOMMENT>: Torque & BHP standard errors are validated by the Dlgalog.
29.31 "HG
53.5 F
77.9 F
62.33 grains H20/lbs. dry air
42.80 t
.9438
One Bag Only
6 IND UNLEADED, 91 OCT
1.8500
.7416
6.1770
Engine Test Class:
Test Date/Time:
Processing Time:
92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
7-22-92 10: 7
07/22/92 13:21:00
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 13923 TIM DAVIS
SEGMENT LENGTH
01
02
03
04
TOT
248
242
300
316
315
1.386
3.667
9.992
1.388
16.433
ACT BHP-HR REF BHP-HR % DIFF
1.363 1.69
3.635 .88
9.937 .55
1.367 1.54
16.302 .80
"Remark: HOT START I 4 FULL E/M"
SPEED SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST RSQUARE NSIZE SHIFT
TORQUE
HP
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
18
23
21
17
20
STD
2
4
3
2
3
STD
1
2
2
1
2
.655
.324
.424
.861
.857
.ERR
.881%
.053%
.0301
.688%
.265%
.ERR
.400%
.475%
.484%
.2331
.050%
1
1
1
1
1
.01289
.01003
.00722
.01360
.00778
SLOPE
.96749
.96181
.97735
.97127
.97618
SLOPE
1
.99439
.99607
.98804
.00186
.99728
-5
-4
-2
-6
-1
.838
.718
.585
.709
.280
CONST
1
1
.835
.323
.392
.681
,952
CONST
1.
.
231
308
021
157
322
.99925
.99944
.99918
.99905
.99964
RSQUARE
.98941
.98393
.99161
.99018
.99155
RSQUARE
.99306
.99128
.99349
.99399
.99528
248
242
300
316
315
NSIZE
242
307
300
315
273
NSIZE
242
242
300
315
273
.8
.8
.8
.8
.8
SHIFT
.8
.8
.8
.8
.8
SHIFT
.8
.8
.8
.8
.8
Oik
n
5
H-
O
H-
§
r
H
CO
tt
5
)•!
11) HS4K
'J9'J
DATE: 07/22/92 TIME: 13:21:04 HD-920134
-------
HD920134
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB HS4F
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 07/22/92 TIME: 13:21:04 PAGE:
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
Cms/
Bhphr
— HC
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Bag 1 NLLN HS 9.580 12.647
Grams
157.420
Cms/
Bhphr
— CO
Cms/
Kw-Hr
161.997 244.062
Grams
2990.760
Cms/
Bhphr
C02
Cms/
Kw-Hr
534.15 716.31
Grams
8777.73
Cms/
Bhphr
— NOx
Cms/
Kw-Hr
3.120 4.184
Grams
51.260
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Fuel
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN HS 1.571 9.705 .591
Measured Fuel Flow: HS 1.650 Gals 10.192 Lbs
Lbs/
Bhphr
BAG DETAIL REPORT
Bag I 1 NLLN HS
Length
Bhp-Hr
Dllut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Cxh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
•
BSFC
1167. SEC.
16.433
17.234
1173.0 Sec.
36080. Cu.Ft.
1.571 Gal. 5.94 L.
9.70 Lb. 4402.0 Gm
.591 Lb/Bhp-Hr
359.49 Gm/Kw-Hr
SITE EMISSION
A009 MEAS HC
A202 MEAS CO
A009 MEAS C02
A009 MEAS NOX
RNG DEFL.
16
22
23
17
2.0
.0
1.7
.0
INU
CONC.
6.10
.00
.031
.00
RNG
16
22
23
17
-t-AIUWOl
DEFL. CONC.
91.0
32.5
25.3
11.2
272
2514
27
.93
.18
.499
.80
v~unnx.i~i c.u
CONCENTRATION
267
2514
27
.18
.18
.470
.80
PPMC
PPM
%
PPM
GRAMS
157.42
2990.76
8777.73
51.26
uri*j /
BHP-HR
9.580
181.997
534.152
3.120
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BAUNCE CHARED TO MEASUR£D FU£L
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow
"S
Dlfference
lib -
J4
IB HS4F
999 CRUSADtRJ50MAR92 0
DATE: 07/22/92 TIME: 13:21:04 HD-920134
-------
HD920149
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB CS1F
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 08/05/92 TIME: 10:24:28 PAGE: 1
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920149
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HD GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D103
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine 1.0.: CRUSADER350MAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 8- 5-92 7:58
Processing Time: 08/05/92 10:24:25
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 11165 MIKE MATTHEWS
29.27 -HG
43.7 F
76.4 F
43.05 grains H20/lbs. dry air
31.20 %
.6694
One Bag Only
TEST CONDITIONS:
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.):
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Cold Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type: 16 COMMERCIAL UNLEADED
Alpha(H/C Ratio): 1.6500
Fuel Specific Gravity: .0000
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel: .0000
COMMENTS:
THIS TEST HAS PROCESSED USING 116 COMMERCIAL UNLEADED CAAB.
1ST COLD START FULL /EM CAAB FUEL
VALIDATION CHECKS:
CONGRATULATIONS!
THIS TEST PASSED CYCLE PERFORMANCE (GAS REGULATIONS)!
: Torque 4 BHP standard errors are validated by the Dlgalog.
SEGMENT LENGTH
ACT BHP-HR REF BIIP-HR
% D1FF
01
02
03
04
TOT
248
244
302
316
315
1 .319
3.620
9.900
1.362
16.262
1.316
3.677
10.097
1.381
16.532
.22
-1.55
-1.95
-1.38
-1.63
"Remark: 1ST COLD START/EMISSIONS/CAAB FUEL--
SPEED SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST RSQUARE NSIZE SHIFT
TORQUE
HP
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
13.
15.
20.
11.
16.
STD.
5.
3.
3.
3.
4.
STD.
2.
2.
2.
1.
2.
491
652
833
619
401
ERR
565%
904%
381%
043%
028%
ERR
725%
206%
762%
301%
363%
1
1
1
1
1
.01078
.00782
.00456
.01104
.00533
SLOPE
1
.99769
.99463
.00211
.99840
.99534
SLOPE
1
1
1
.01746
.00023
.00023
.99955
.99335
-23
-22
-19
-23
-18
.743
.409
.535
.994
.720
CONST
_
-
-1
-
-
.541
.686
.418
.820
.763
CONST
-
-
-1
-
-
.244
.375
.104
.210
.325
.99961
.99974
.99922
.99960
.99977
RSQUARE
.96248
.90601
.99016
.90809
.98771
RSQUARE
.97399
.99294
. 99207
.99314
.99358
248
244
302
316
315
NSIZE
244
307
302
315
273
NSIZE
244
244
302
315
273
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
n
H
6
C
h
I
u
PI
H
F
I
H
O
O
(0
ft
5
III, '*. ~1 -I t
11)
'J9-J CRUiiAUI.i<
DAT.:: C;!i/U!i/92 T1MK: 10:24:29 HD-920149
-------
HD920149
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB CS1F
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 08/05/92 TIME: 10:24:29 PAGE:
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
Cms/
Bhphr
— HC
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Bag 1 NLLN CS 9.871 13.237
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Fuel
Grams
160.520
Lbs/
Bhphr
CO -
Cats/ Cms/
Bhphr Kw-Hr
175.956 235.961
Grams
2661.400
Cms/
Bhphr
— C02
Cms/
Kw-Hr
554.75 743.93
Grans
9021.37
Cms/
Bhphr
NOx
Cms/
Kw-Hr
3.206 4.299
Grams
52.130
o
M
6
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN CS .000 9.740 .599
Measured Fuel Flow: CS 1.700 Gals
.000 Lbs
I
BAG DETAIL REPORT
Bag I 1 NLLN CS
Length 1167. SEC.
Bhp-Hr 16.262
Dllut. Factor 16.960
Bag Fill Time 1172.0 Sec.
Exh. Volume 35970. Cu.Ft.
Fuel Consump. .000 Gal. .00 L.
• 9.74 Lb. 4417.8 Gm
BSFC .599 Lb/Bhp-Hr
• 364.36 Gm/Ku-Hr
SITE EMISSION
A202 MEAS HC
A202 MEAS CO
A009 MEAS C02
A009 MEAS NOX
unc IUJKUUHLI [.Annual
RNG
19
22
23
17
DEFL.
.2
.1
2.1
.0
CONC
6.
6.
.
.
.
33
93
038
00
RNG
19
22
23
17
DEFL.
8.9
31.4
26.3
12.4
CONC
279.
2419.
.
30.
LUIMU.L. 1 tU LlMb /
CONCENTRATION
24
31
520
78
273.28
2412.79
.484
30.78
PPMC
PPM
%
PPM
GRAMS
160.52
2861.40
9021.37
52.13
BI1P-HR
9.871
175.956
554.752
3.206
O
O
H
u
Ct
I
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED KUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow Difference
CS 9.V40 .000 .00*
HD-920H9
IB CS1F
999 CRUSAOi i<
DATE: OU/05/92 TIME: 10:24:29 HD-920149
-------
HD920150
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB HS1F
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 08/06/92 TIME: 15:35:47 PAGE:
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
HC
Cms/ Cms/
Bhphr Kw-Hr Grans
Bag 1 NLLN HS 10.110 13.558 164.070
Cms/
Bhphr
— CO
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Grains
174.735 234.323 2835.590
Cms/
Bhphr
— C02
Cms/
Kw-Hr
554.84 744.05
Grains
9003.94
Cms/
Bhphr
NOx
Cms/
Kw-Hr
3.140 4.211
Grains
50.950
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Fuel
Lbs/
Bhphr
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN HS .000 9.707 .598
Measured Fuel Flow: HS 1.640 Gals
o
H
6
jr.
H
.000 Lbs
BAG DETAIL REPORT
s
Bag « 1 NLLN HS
Length
Bhp-Hr
Dllut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Con sump.
•
BSFC
•
1167. SEC.
16.228
17.010
1172.0 Sec.
36030. Cu.Ft.
.000 Gal. .00 L.
9.71 Lb. 4403.1 Gm
.598 Lb/Bhp-Hr
363.75 Gm/Kw-Hr
SITE EMISSION
A009 MEAS HC
A202 MEAS CO
A009 MEAS C02
A009 MEAS NOX
d«l_N->KUUNU
RNG
16
22
23
17
DEFL.
1.0
.1
2.2
.0
CONC
3.
6.
.
.
.
05
93
040
00
LAItnUDl
RNG
16
22
23
17
DEFL
93.
31.
26.
12.
9
1
3
1
CONC
281.
2393.
t
30.
72
57
520
03
i~vjr\nc.v» l c.u
CONCENTRATION
278.85 PPMC
2387.05 PPM
.482 %
30.03 PPM
GRAMS
164.07
2835.59
9003.94
50.95
uru/
BHP-HR
10.110
174.735
554.840
3.140
CO
rt
5
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow Difference
HS 9.707 .000 .001
HO-
1U HSU'
999 CHUSAOEK3iC:''AR92 0
DATE: OU/06/92 TIME: 15:35:47 HD-920150
-------
HD920150
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB HS1F
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 08/06/92 TIME: 15:35:46 PAGE: 1
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920150
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HD GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D103
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER350MAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
TEST CONDITIONS:
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.):
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type:
Alpha(H/C Ratio):
Fuel Specific Gravity:
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel:
COMMENTS:
29.2? "HG
43.7 F
77.5 F
43.05 grains H20/lbs. dry air
30.00 %
.8694
One Bag Only
16 COMMERCIAL UNLEADED
1.6500
.0000
.0000
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 8- 5-92 8:36
Processing Time: OB/06/92 15:33:28
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 11165 MIKE MATTHEWS
SEGMENT LENGTH ACT BHP-HR REF BHP-HR % DIFF
01
02
03
04
TOT
248
242
301
316
315
1.369
3.616
9.890
1.353
16.228
1.376
3.677
10.097
1.381
16.532
-.51
-1 .66
-2.05
-2.03
-1.84
"Remark: 1ST HOT START/EMISSIONS/CAAB FUEL"
SPEED SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST HSQUARE NS1ZE SHIFT
THIS TEST WAS PROCESSED USING II 16 COMMERCIAL UNLEADED FUf.1.
1ST HOT START FULL /EM CAAB FUEL
VALIDATION CHECKS:
CONGRATULATIONS!
THIS TEST PASSED CYCLE PERFORMANCE (GAS REGULATIONS)!
: Torque & BHP standard errors are validated by L.'.O Dkj..lc;
TORQUE
HP
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
13.
15.
20.
11.
16.
STD.
3.
3.
3.
3.
3.
STD.
1.
2.
2.
1.
2.
267
588
050
790
093
ERR
124%
821%
388%
114%
407t
ERR
439%
190%
816%
301%
111%
1
1
1
1
1
.00951
.00641
.00325
.01003
.00396
SLOPE
1
.99782
.99244
.00412
.99636
.99496
SLOPE
1
.99563
.99715
.00106
.99714
.99120
-23
-21
-19
-24
-18
.081
.903
.283
.058
.229
CONST
_
-
-1
-
-
.441
.589
.545
.846
.734
CONST
_
-
-1
-.
-,
.105
.311
.200
.230
.309
.99962
.99975
.99927
.99958
.99978
RSQUARE
.98827
.98653
.99016
.98750
.99119
RSQUARE
.99255
.99301
.99177
.99314
.99485
246
242
301
316
315
NSIXE
242
307
301
315
273
NSIZF.
242
242
301
315
273
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
. 6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
n
H
6
DO
H
r
I
(0
ft
5
Ib IIS IF
999
DAT.:: Ub/06/92 TIME: 15:35:47 HU-920150
-------
HD920151
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB HS2F
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TE:.
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 08/10/92 TIME: 14:20:15 PAGE: 1
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920151
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HD GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D103
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER350MAH92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CIV
TEST CONDITIONS:
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.):
NOx Core. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type:
Alpha(H/C Ratio):
Fuel Specific Gravity:
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel:
COMMENTS:
29.29 "HG
44.8 F
T7.5 F
44.88 grains H20/lbs. dry air
31.30 %
.8760
One Bag Only
16 COMMERCIAL UNLEADED
1.8500
.0000
.0000
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 8- 5-92 9:16
Processing Time: 08/06/92 15:30:58
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 11165 MIKE MATTHEWS
SEGMENT LENGTH ACT BHP-HR HEF BHP-HR
I OUT
01
02
03
04
TOT
248
241
302
316
315
1.373
3.621
9.878
1.360
16.232
1 .376
3.677
10.097
1 .381
16.5-32
-.22
-1.52
-2.17
-1.52
-1.81
n
H
i
"Remark: 2ND HOT START/EMISSIONS/CAAO FUEL"
SPEED SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST RSQUARE NSIZE SHIFT
5
(0
THIS TEST PROCESSED USING t 16 COMMERCIAL UNLEADED
2ND HOT START FULL/EM CAAB FUEL
VALIDATION CHECKS:
CONGRATULATIONS!
THIS TEST PASSED CYCLE PERFORMANCE (GAS REGULATIONS!!
: Torque ( BHP standard errors are validated by the Dlgalog.
TORQUE
HP
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
17
18
23
14
19
STD,
4.
4.
3.
3.
4.
STD.
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
.059
.601
.238
.000
.026
.ERR
001%
8901
804%
633%
148%
ERR
969%
887%
028%
689%
543%
1.00818
1.00511
1.00197
1.00878
1.00281
SLOPE
.99637
.99212
1.00930
.99678
.99475
SLOPE
.99167
.99320
1.00481
.99613
.99007
-22.672
-21.327
-18.429
-23.741
-17.932
CONST
-.238
-.381
-1.899
-.712
-.614
CONST
-.018
-.192
-1.466
-.170
-.269
.99937
.99964
.99902
.99941
.99969
RSQUAKE
.98086
.97811
.98775
.98308
.98699
RSQUARE
.98605
.98781
.99057
.98845
.99253
248
241
302
316
315
NSIZE
241
307
302
315
273
NSIZE
241
241
302
315
273
6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
CO
rt
10
HD-920151
IB HS2F
999 CRUSADEI<3bOMAK'J2 0
DATE: OB/10/92 TIME: 14:20:17 HD-920151
-------
HD920151
999 CRUSAOER350MAR92 0
IB HS2F
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 08/10/92 TIME: 14:20:17 PAGE:
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
Cms/
Bhphr
— HC
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Bag 1 NLLN HS 10.495 14.074
Grans
170.350
Cms/
Bhphr
— CO
Cms/
Kw-Hr
176.820 237.119
Grains
2870.150
Cms/ Cms/
Bhphr Kw-Hr
548.05 734.95
Grains
8895.98
Cms/
Bhphr
— NOx
Cms/
Kw-Hr
3.141 4.212
Grams
50.980
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Fuel
Ubs/
Bhphr
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN HS .000 9.684 .597
Measured Fuel Flow: HS 1.640 Gals
O
H
5
.000 Lbs
BAG DETAIL REPORT
Bag I 1 NLLN HS
Length
Bhp-Hr
Dllut. Factor
Bag Fill Tine
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
n
BSFC
1167. SEC.
16.232
17.074
1173.0 Sec.
36080. Cu.Ft.
.000 Gal. .00 L.
9.68 Lb. 4392.5 Gm
.597 Lb/Bhp-Hr
363.14 Gm/ Kw-Hr
SITE EMISSION
A009 MEAS HC
A202 MEAS CO
A009 MEAS C02
A009 MEAS NOX
n/M*i\onuunu
RNG
16
22
23
17
DEFL.
.7
.1
2.2
.0
CONC
2.
6.
.
.
f
13
93
040
00
t-Aimuoi
RNG
16
22
23
17
DEFL.
97.0
31.4
26.0
12.0
CONC
291.
2419.
.
29.
i^uiwr.L, i r-u
CONCENTRATION
14
31
514
78
289.13
2412.78
.476
29.78
PPMC
PPM
%
PPM
GRAMS
170.35
2870.15
8895.98
50.98
uns/
BHP-HR
10.495
176.820
548.052
3.141
(0
H
r
CO
rt
5
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow Difference
HS 9.684 .000 .00%
HD-9201M
IB HS2F
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
DATE: 08/10/92 TIME: 14:20:17 HD-920151
-------
HD920152
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB CS2C
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 08/06/92 TIME: 15:12:21 PAGE:
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No. : HD-920152
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HO GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D101
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER350MAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
TEST CONDITIONS:
29.35 "HG
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature: 47.4 F
Dry Bulb Temperature: 77.1 F
Humidity (Abs.l:
Humidity (Rel.):
NOx Core. Factor:
49.48 grains H20/lbs. dry air
35.00 %
.8929
One Bag Only
TEST OPTIONS:
Cold Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type: 16 COMMERCIAL UNLEADED
Alpha(H/C Ratio): 1.8500
Fuel Specific Gravity: .0000
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel: .0000
COMMENTS:
COLD START I 2 FULL E/M CAAB FUEL
THIS TEST WAS PROCESSED USING I CAAB I 16 COMMERCIAL FUU.
VALIDATION CHECKS:
CONGRATULATIONS!
THIS TEST PASSED CYCLE PERFORMANCE (GAS REGUlATIOtJS) !
: Torque l BHP standard errors are validated Ly it..;
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 8- 6-92 10:45
Processing Time: 08/06/92 15:12:18
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 11165 MIKE MATTHEWS
SEGMENT LENGTH ACT BHP-HR REF BIIP-HR % DIFF
H
O
o
H
i
01
02
03
04
TOT
248
243
302
316
316
1.402
3.652
9.933
1.381
16.368
1.376
3.677
10.097
1.381
16.532
1.89
-.68
-1.62
.00
-.99
"Remark: COLD START I 2 FULL EM CAAB FUEL"
SPEED SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST KSQIJARE NSUE
SHIFT
TORQUE
HP
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
17
18
23
13
19
STD
6
5
3
3
4
STD
3
2
2
1
2
.407
.276
.516
.748
.105
.ERR
.803%
.025%
.798%
.568%
.892%
.ERR
.516%
.930%
.950%
.673%
.878%
.00836
.00515
.00182
.00855
.00274
SLOPE
1
1
.99618
.99834
.00917
.00260
.99712
SLOPE
1
1
1
1
.02509
.00401
.00936
.00727
.99794
-5.430
-3.934
-.807
-6.207
-
477
CONST
__
-.
-1.
-.
-.
266
647
857
769
704
CONST
__
-.
-1.
-.
-.
141
296
426
181
296
.99935
.99965
.99900
.99943
.99969
RSQUARE
.94304
.97720
.98790
.98379
.98201
RSQUAKE
.95634
.98771
.99118
.98882
.99058
248
243
302
316
316
NSIZE
243
307
302
316
273
NSI2E
243
243
302
316
273
.6
. 6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
. g
. 6
. 6
. 6
.6
SHIFT
.6
. &
.6
. 6
.6
5
0
01
H
I
\
o
o
H
P.
CO
ft
ro
1U
CS2C
999 CHUliAlVK.i-....MAK'J2 0
DATE: OU/06/92 TIME: 15:12:22 HD-920152
-------
HD920152
999 CRUSAOER3SOMAR92 0
IB CS2C
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 08/06/92 TIME: 15:12:22 PAGE:
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
Cms/
Bhphr
HC
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Bag 1 NLLN CS 9.956 13.351
Grans
162.970
Cms/
Bhphr
— CO
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Grams
180.660 242.269 2957.050
Cms/
Bhphr
— CO2
Cms/
Kw-Hr
563.61 755.90
Grams
9226.22
Cms/
Bhphr
— NOx
Cms/
Kw-Hr
3.392 4.549
Grams
55.530
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Fuel
Lbs/
Bhphr
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN CS .000 9.992 .610
Measured Fuel Flow: CS 1.730 Gals
6
£
H
.000 Lbs
BAG DETAIL REPORT
Bag I 1 NLLN CS
Length
Bhp-Hr
Dllut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
N
BSFC
1167. SEC.
16.368
16.820
1172.0 Sec.
36140. Cu.Ft.
.000 Gal. .00 L.
9.99 Lb. 4532.1 Cm
.610 Lb/Bhp-Hr
371.05 Gm/Kw-Hr
nm-i\u«uuHu c.Aiu\uai
SITE
A202
A202
A009
A009
EMISSION
MEAS HC
MEAS CO
MEAS C02
MEAS NOX
RNG
19
22
23
17
DEFL.
.0
.1
1.6
.0
CONC.
.00
6.93
.029
.00
RNG
19
22
23
17
DEFL.
8.8
32.2
26.3
12.8
CONC
276.
2488.
.
31.
13
23
520
77
L-UIUU.I. 1 C.U
CONCENTRATION
276.13 PPMC
2481.71 PPM
.493 %
31.77 PPM
GRAMS
162.97
2957.05
9226.22
55.53
iirlD/
BHP-HR
9.956
160.660
563.674
3.392
(0
|
H
r
o
o
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow Difference
CS 9.992 .000 .001
(0
rt
5
K>
HD-920152
IB CS2C
999 CRUSADER35CMAR92 0
DATt: OB/06/92 TIME: 15:12:22 HD-920152
-------
HD920153
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB HS3C
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 08/06/92 TIME: 15:09:11 PAGE: 1
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920153
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HD GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D103
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADEH350MAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
29.39 "HG
47.7 F
78.2 F
49.98 grains H20/lbs. dry air
34.20 %
.6948
One Bag Only
TEST CONDITIONS:
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.l:
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type: 16 COMMERCIAL UNLEADED
Alpha(H/C Ratio): 1.8500
Fuel Specific Gravity: .0000
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel: .0000
COMMENTS:
HOT START i 3 FULL E/M CAAB FUEL
THIS TEST WAS PROCESSED USING I 16 CAAB COMMERCIAL FU£L
VALIDATION CHECKS:
CONGRATULATIONS!
THIS TEST PASSED CYCLE PERFORMANCE (GAS REGULATIONS)!
: Torque & BHP standard errors are valldjt;.;! ly u... i;i.j.:lc'.,;XA;
-------
HD920153
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB HS3C
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 08/06/92 TIME: 15:09:12 PAGE:
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
Cms/
Bhphr
—.- HC
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Bag 1 NLLN HS 10.459 14.026
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Fuel
Grams
170.630
Lbs/
Bhphr
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN HS .000 9.868 .605
Measured Fuel Flow: HS 1.660 Gals
Cms/
Bhphr
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Grams
180.612 242.205 2946.660
Cms/ Cms/
Bhphr Kw-Hr
554.12 743.08
Grams
9040.42
Cms/ Cms/
Bhphr Kw-Hr Grams
3.227 4.327
52.640
.000 Lbs
BAG DETAIL REPORT
o
H
S
t
n
Length
Bhp-Hr
Dllut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Con sump.
•
BSFC
•
1167.
16.315
17.007
1173.0
36170.
.000
9.87
.605
368.01
SEC.
Sec.
Cu.Ft.
Gal. .00 L.
Lb. 4476.1 Gm
Lb/Bhp-Hr
Gm/Kw-Hr
SITE EMISSION
A009 MEAS HC
A202 MEAS CO
A009 MEAS C02
A009 MEAS NOX
uriv- rvu (AWUIMU — —
RNG DEFL. CONC.
16 1.0 3.05
22 .0 .00
23 1.7 .031
17 .0 .00
CAttrtUil
RNG DEFL. CONC.
16 97.2 291.75
22 32.0 2470.96
23 25.9 .512
17 12.1 30.03
CUKKtCitU
CONCENTRATION
268.88 PPMC
2470.96 PPM
.482 t
30.03 PI'M
GRAMS
170.63
2946.68
9040.42
52.64
CMS/
BHP-HR
10.459
160.612
554.117
3.227
9
H
*
g
•
t-i
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow Difference
HS 9.868 .000 .00%
00
ft
5
Ul
III. 'I. V; I •„ 1
111 IISJC
99
-------
HD920154
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB HS4C
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: OB/06/92 TIME: 15:19:18 PAGE: 1
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920154
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HD GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D103
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
TEST CONDITIONS:
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER3SOMAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 8- 6-92 12: 2
Processing Time: 08/06/92 15:19:1(5
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 11165 MIKE MATTHEWS
Barometer: 29.39 "HG
Dew Point Temperature: 47.3 F
Dry Bulb Temperature: 78.2 F
Humidity (Abs.): 49.22 grains H20/lbs. dry air
Humidity (Rel.): 33.70 %
NOx Corr. Factor: .8919
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only One Bag Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type: 16 COMMERCIAL UNLEADED
Alpha(H/C Ratio) : 1.8500
Fuel Specific Gravity: .0000
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel: .0000
COMMENTS:
HOT START I 4 FULL E/M CAAB FUEL
THIS TEST WAS PROCESSED USING I 16 COMMERCIAL UNLEADED H':.l.
SEGMENT LENGTH
ACT BHP-HR REF BHP-HR
% DIFF
01
02
03
04
TOT
248
243
301
316
315
1 .375
3.632
9.918
1.365
16.289
1.376
3.677
10.097
1.381
16.532
-.07
-1.22
-1.77
-1.16
-1.47
•Remark: HOT START ( 4 FULL E/M CAAB FUEL-
SPEED SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST RSQUARE NSIZE SHIFT
VALIDATION CHECKS:
CONGRATULATIONS!
THIS TEST PASSED CYCLE PERFORMANCE (GAS REGULATIONS)!
: Torque t BHP standard errors are validated Ly if.>.- D
TORQUE
HP
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
12
15
19
11
15
STD
3
3
3
3
3
STD
1
2
2
1
2
.609
.588
.519
.662
.716
.ERR
.082%
.708%
.412%
.018%
.350%
.ERR
.392%
.070%
.736%
.346%
.053%
1
1
1
1
.00568
.00309
.99995
.00686
.00071
SLOPE
1
.99741
.99786
.00695
.99831
.99735
SLOPE
1
1
1
1
.00037
.00296
.00471
.00392
.99501
-4.
-4.
-1.
-6.
-.
,891
,219
,279
,448
,583
CONST
_
-.
-1.
-.
-.
489
766
695
878
823
CONST
-.
-.
-1.
-.
-.
130
375
268
241
338
.99965
.99974
.99931
.99959
.99979
RSQUARE
.98855
.98744
.99008
.98828
.99152
HSQUARE
.99308
.99383
.99229
.99273
.99517
248
243
301
316
315
NSIZE
243
307
301
315
273
NSIZE
243
243
301
315
273
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
. 6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
O
H
I
(0
PI
§
H
H-
0
•s
I
CO
ft
I
Ib
IIS4C
999 CI
-------
HD9201S4
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB HS4C
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 08/06/92 TIME: 15:19:20 PAGE:
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
Cms/
Bhphr
HC
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Grams
Bag 1 NLLN HS 10.623 14.246 173.030
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Fuel
Lbs/
Bhphr
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN HS .000 9.734 .598
Measured Fuel Flow: HS 1.650 Gals
Cms/ Cms/
Bhphr Kw-Hr Grams
179.844 241.175 2929.490
Cms/
Bhphr
.000 Lbs
BAG DETAIL REPORT
— C02
Cms/
Kw-Hr
544.36 730 00
Cms/ Cms/
Grams Bhphr Kw-Hr Grams
8867.12 3.246 4.353 52.880
Bag I 1 NLL
Length
Bhp-Hr
Dllut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
•
BSFC
1167. SEC.
16.289
17.233
1171.0 Sec.
36150. Cu.Ft.
.000 Gal. .00 L.
9.73 Lb. 4415.4 Gffl
.598 Lb/Bhp-Hr
363.75 Gm/Ku-Hr
SITE EMISSION
A009 MEAS HC
A202 MEAS CO
A009 MEAS C02
A009 MEAS NOX
unv.rvur*uui*u
RNG DEFL. CONC.
16
22
23
17
.8
.2
1.6
.0
2.44
13.87
.029
.00
RNG
16
22
23
17
DEFL.
98.4
32.0
25.4
12.2
aj
CONC.
295.41
2470.96
.501
30.28
lUHMtX.TLU
CONCENTRATION
293.11
2457.90
.473
30.28
PPMC
PPM
PIJM
GRAMS
173.03
2929.49
8867.12
52.88
CMS/
BHP-HR
10.623
179.844
544.362
3.246
g
5
I
c
f
I
00
ft
5
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow Difference
HS 9.734 -000 .00%
in. /. » ( -.4
Ill HS4C
DAVE: 0«/U6/'J2 TIME: 15:19:20 110-920154
-------
HD920140
999 CROSADER350MAR92 0
IB
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 07/30/92 TIME: 10:22:44 PAGE: 1
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920140
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HO GAS TRANSIENT
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER350MAR92
Version: 0
Engine Tost Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 7-29-92 14:25
Processing Time: 07/29/92 15:13:14
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D101 CVS I.D.: 36C
Dyno Operator: 11165 MIKE MATTHEWS CVS Type: CFV
Test Requestor: 13923 TIM DAVIS
Analyzer Operator: 11165 MIKE MATTHEWS
TEST CONDITIONS:
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.):
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Cold Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type:
Alpha(H/C Ratio):
Fuel Specific Gravity:
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel:
COMMENTS:
29.00 "HG
47.0 F
•76.8 F
49.32 grains H20/lbs. dry air
34.90 %
.8923
One Bag Only
6 IND UNLEADED, 91 OCT
1.8500
.7416
6.1770
SEGMENT LENGTH
ACT BHP-HR REF BHP-HR
% UIFF
Ut
t*
s
«0
o
C/S II T-90 LOW FUEL NATURAL COOL DOWN AFTER RUNNING K..<
IN THE A.M. NO F/C/D USED
VALIDATION CHECKS:
CONGRATULATIONS!
THIS TEST PASSED CYCLE PERFORMANCE (GAS RECUI.ATICNS) !
: Torque t BHP standard errors are validated l>y ;.:.o
01
02
03
04
TOT
"Remark
SPEED
TORQUE
HP
: C/S
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
248
245
304
316
313
T90
STD.
16.
18.
24.
13.
19.
STD.
3.
4.
4.
3.
4.
STD.
2.
3.
3.
1.
3.
LOW
ERR
703
574
839
379
391
ERR
824*
675%
446%
440%
226%
ERR
098%
392%
729%
853%
024%
1.418
3.726
10.145
1.407
16.696
FUEL 11"
SLOPE
1 .00639
1 .00394
1 .00069
1 .00682
1.00155
SLOPE
.94913
.93769
.93220
.94736
.95078
SLOPE
.96093
.96710
.93999
.96450
.96732
1.
3.
10.
1.
16.
CONST
-6.
-5.
-2-.
-6.
-1.
416
378
149
712
876
CONST
1.
2.
3.
1.
1.
CC.^J
•>
519
219
950
399
931
ST
543
B24
909
418
B49
393
731
219
396
738
RSO.UARE
.99939
.99964
.99888
.99946
.99968
HSQIJARE
.96092
.97810
.98097
.98333
.98538
R SCI 'ARE
.911309
.91)272
.98407
.98517
.9H901
1.79
-.13
-.72
.79
-.25
NiilZt.
24B
215
304
316
313
Nsm:
245
307
304
31 J
273
N si '/.!•:
24'j
24'j
304
313
273
SI: I FT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
.C
O
o
(A
ft
5
.6
HD-920140
1U
999 CRUSADER 13CMARU2 0
DATE: U//30/92 TIME: 10:22:4b IID-920140
-------
H0920140
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 07/30/92 TIME: 10:22:45 PAGE:
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
Cms/
Bhphr
HC
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Bag 1 NLLN CS 7.617 10.215
Grains
127.180
Cms/
Bhphr
— CO
Cms/
Kw-Hr
166.048 222.674
Grams
2772.340
C02
Cms/ Cms/
Bhphr Kw-Hr
577.45 774.37
Grains
9641.10
Cms/
Bhphr
— NOx
Cms/
Kw-Hr
3.252 4.361
Grams
54.300
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Fuel
Lbs/
Bhphr
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN CS 1.619 9.999 .599
Measured Fuel Flow: CS 1.690 Gals 10.439 Lbs
?
I
10
O
UAG DETAIL REPORT
Bag I 1 NLLN CS
Length 1167. SEC.
Bhp-Hr 16.696
Dllut. Factor 16.489
Bag Fill Time 1173.0 Sec.
Exh. Volume 35640. Cu.Ft.
Fuel Consump. 1.619 Gal. 6.12 L.
• 10.00 Lb. 4535.5 Gm
BSFC .599 Lb/Bhp-Hr
• 364.36 Gm/Kw-Hr
SITE EMISSION
A009 MEAS HC
A202 MEAS CO
A009 MEAS C02
A009 MEAS NOX
_ ~ •
HNG
16
22
23
17
• lin*-iMjHV.
DEFL.
.5
.0
1.9
.0
JUHU--
CONC.
1
.52
.00
.035
.00
RNG
16
22
23
17
--tAH
DEFL
73.
30.
27.
12.
JVJ
4
7
9
7
31
CONC
219.
2359.
f
31 .
95
34
555
52
LUNtttu itu
CONCENTRATION
218.51 PPMC
2359.34 PPM
.522 %
31.52 Pl'M
GRAMS
127.18
2772.34
9641.10
54.30
IjMi/
BHP-HR
7.617
166.048
577.449
3.252
O
O
H
a
s
I
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow Difference
cs 9.999 10.439 -4.211
Kb
40
IB
999 CRUSADEK350MAR92 0
DATE: 07/30/92 TIME: 10:22:45 HD-920140
-------
HD920141
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
HAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 07/30/92 TIME: 10:15:16 PAGE:
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
Gins/
Bhphr
— HC
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Bag 1 NLLN HS 6.742 9.041
Grams
112.510
Cms/
Bhphr
--- CO
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Grams
163.272 218.951 2724.520
Cms/
Bhphr
— CO2
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Grams
537.51 720.82 8969.47
Cms/
Bhphr
— NOx
Cms/
Kw-Hr
3.143 4.215
Grams
52.450
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Fuel
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN HS 1.530 9.448 .566
Measured Fuel Flow: HS 1.660 Gals 10.254 Lbs
Lbs/
Bhphr
I
H
Bag 1 1 NLLN HS
Length
Bhp-Hr
Dllut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Con sump.
•
BSFC
•
1167. SEC.
16.687
17.417
1172.0 Sec.
35670. Cu.Ft.
1.530 Gal. 5.78 L.
9.45 Lb. 4285.7 Cm
.566 Lb/Bhp-Hr
344.28 Gm/ Kw-Hr
SITE EMISSION
A009 MEAS HC
A202 MEAS CO
A009 MEAS C02
A009 MEAS NOX
DAG DETAIL REPORT
UACKCROUND
KNG DEFL.
16 1.0
22 .0
23 1.9
17 .0
I EXHAUST
)NC.
3.05
.00
.035
.00
RNG
16
22
23
17
DEFL.
65.4
30.2
26.2
12.2
CONC .
196.03
2316.69
.518
30.28
CORRECTED
CONCENTRATION
193.15 PPMC
2316.69 PPM
.485 %
30.28 PPM
GRAMS
112.51
2724.52
8969.47
52.45
CMS/
BHP-HR
6.742
163.272
537.513
3.143
r
H
CA
ft
5
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FI.OW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow Difference
HS 9.448 10.254 -1.86*
IID-920141
999 CRUSAOERJ^OMAR92 0
DATE: OV/30/92 TIME: 10:15:16 HD-920141
-------
HD920141
999 CRUSADER3SOMAR92 0
IB
HfciAVY Dim OASOLIIIE TRANSIENT TEST
A[)Mit:u;rnA'i IVL REPORT
DAT!'.: U//IU/'J2 TIMK: 10:lb:15 PAGE:
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920141
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HO GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D101
Dyno Operator: 11165 MIKE MATTHEWS
TEST CONDITIONS:
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADEK350MAH92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 1-29-92 15: 4
Processing Time: 07/30/92 10:15:12
Test Requestor: 11165 MIKE MATTHEWS
Analyzer Operator: 11165 MIKE MATTHEWS
29.00 »HG
47.6 F
77.8 F
50.46 grains H20/lbs. dry air
34.50 %
.8966
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.):
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type:
Alpha(H/C Ratio):
Fuel Specific Gravity:
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel:
COMMENTS:
H/S 1 T90 FUEL
VALIDATION CHECKS:
CONGRATULATIONS!
THIS TEST PASSED CYCLE PERFORMANCE (GAS
: Torque t'BHP standard errors are validated t;y ti.
One Bag Only
6 IND UNLEADED, 91 OCT
1.8500
.7416
6.1770
SEGMENT LENGTH
01 248
02 242
03 302
04 316
TOT 31 6
ACT BHP-HR
1.417
3.721
10.144
1.405
16.687
"Remark: H/S T90 LOW
SPEED
TORQUE
IIP
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
C2
03
04
TOT
STD
17
18
25
14
19
STD
3
4
4
3
4
STD
2
3
3
1
2
.ERR
.000
.520
.000
.036
.596
.ERR
.892%
.535%
.280%
.462%
.153%
.ERR
.1191
.329%
.568%
.852%
.946%
FUEL U"
SLOPE
1.00553
1 .00270
.99972
1 .00632
1 .00040
SI.CPE
.94806
.93356
.93714
.94415
.95038
SI CPE
.95881
.96416
.94417
.96318
.96749
R£F BHP-HR , %
1.393
3.731
10.219
1.396
16.738
CCJH
-5.
-4.
-2.
-6.
-1.
sr
743
813
225
922
279
CONST
1.
2.
3.
1.
1.
ecu
2.
651
350
691
475
991
,..,.
608
864
691
417
846
KSOUAkE
.99937
.99964
.99886
.99941
.99967
RSGUARE
.98027
.97916
.98256
.98300
.98594
KSCUAHE
.98281
.98329
.98560
.98514
.98'Jb9
DIFK
1.72
-.27
-.73
.64
-.30
m;i;:..
243
2-12
302
316
316
NSIZI:
242
30V
302
3 1 6
273
H^I:-.
;• .", . ;
2-1.:
302
31.'.
2 i i
Lnli'T
. 6
. C
.6
.6
.6
Siili'T
.6
. u
.6
.6
.(.
'..... i
t ,
. I,
. U
. G
. C
5
i
o
(0
Ct
I
'20141
9'J9
DATE: OV/30/92 TIME: 10:11x16 HD-920141
-------
HD920142
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB
HEAVY DU'IY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
HAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 0//30/92 TIME: 10:20:04 PAGE:
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
Cms/
Bhphr
HC
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Bag 1 NLLN HS 6.822 9.148
Crams
113.630
Cms/
Bhphr
— CO
Cms/
Kw-Hr
164.315 220.350
Grams
2*736.640
Cms/
Bhphr
— CO2
Cms/
Kw-Hr
543.28 72fc.55
Grams
9048.90
NOx
Cms/ Cms/
Bhphr Kw-Hr
3.142 4.213
Grains
52.330
FUEL CONSUMPTION:.
Fuel
Gals Ubs
Bag 1 NLLN HS 1.541 9.519 .572
Measured Fuel Flow: HS 1.650 Gals 10.192 Lbs
Lbs/
Bhphr
BAG DETAIL REPORT
Bag I 1 NLLI
Length
Bhp-Hr
Ollut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
H
BSFC
N Mb
1167.
16.656
17.348
1173.0
35700.
1.541
9.52
.572
347.93
1 JAl~ (SUItUUIUJ LAIlrtUO 1
SEC.
Sec.
Cu.Ft.
Gal. 5.62 L.
Lb. 4317.9 Gm
Lb/Bhp-Hr
Gm/ Kw-Hr
SITE
A009
A202
A009
A009
EMISSION
MEAS HC
MEAS CO
MEAS C02
MEAS NOX
HNG
16
22
23
17
DEFL.
.7
.0
1.8
.0
CONC.
2.13
.00
.033
.00
RNG DEFL.
16 65.7
22 30.3
23 26.3
17 12.2
CONC.
196.92
2325.21
.520
30.28
*-ur\nc.»~ i c.u
CONCENTRATION
194.91 PPMC
2325.21 PPM
.469 %
30.28 PPM
GRAMS
113.63
2736.84
9048.90
52.33
on o /
BHP-HR
6.822
164.315
543.282
3.142
t*
s
(4
\
tH
I
CO
ft
5
10
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED HJEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flew Difference
HS 9.519 10.192 -6.60*
HD-920142
IB
U'J'J
DATt:: O//JO/92 TIME: 10:20:04 HU-920H2
-------
H0920142
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: OV/30/92 TIME: 10:20:02 PAGE: 1
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920142
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HD GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D101
Dyno Operator: 11165 MIKE MATTHEWS
TEST CONDITIONS:
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.U.: CRUSADER350MAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 7-29-92 15:45
Processing Time: 07/30/92 10:11:39
Test Requestor: 11165 MIKE MATTHEWS
Analyzer Operator: 11165 MIKE MATTHEH3
28.98 "HG
47.2 F
77.5 F
49.74 grains H2O/lbs. dry air
34.30 I
.8939
One Barj Only
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.):
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type: 6 IND UNLEADED, 91 CCT
Alpha(H/C Ratio): 1.8500
Fuel Specific Gravity: .7416
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel: 6.1770
COMMENTS:
H/S 2 T90
VALIDATION CHECKS:
CONGRATULATIONS!
THIS TEST PASSED CYCLE PERFORMANCE (GAS REGULMiCNS)!
: Torque 4 BHP standard errors are val id.ic._-:l Ly U:.;
SEGMENT LENGTH ACT DHP-HR REF BHP-HR % DIKE
01
02
03
04
TOT
"Remark
SPEED
TORQUE
HP
: H/S
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
248
242
303
316
316
T90
STD.
13.
15.
20.
11.
16.
STD.
3.
4.
3.
3.
3.
STD.
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
LOW
ERR
267
620
904
832
401
ERR
220%
127%
912%
044%
723%
ERR
608%
903%
286%
546%
611%
1.401
3.710
10.141
1.404
16.656
FUEL »2"
SLOPE
1 .00529
1.00242
.99934
1 .00619
.99999
SLOPE
.94436
.93494
.93582
.94163
.95039
SLOPE
.960;Jl
.96590
.94205
.96501
.96813
1.
3.
10.
1.
16.
CONST
-6.
-5.
-2.
-7.
-1.
396
445
861
501
713
CONST
1.
2.
3.
1.
1.
479
161
818
554
923
393
731
219
396
738
RSO.UARE
.99962
.99974
.99920
.99958
.99977
RSOUARE
.98631
.98274
.98535
.98674
.98867
.57
-.56
-.76
.57
-.49
ujm:
248
242
303
316
316
NSIXK
2-12
:io/
:i03
316
2 73
CONST R5QUAi /3
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SiilcT
.6
. 6
.6
.6
Ul
5
I
«O
O
I
H
S
. O
. 6
.0
/•
. L,
HD-920142
Hi
999 CKUSADER3::OMAR92 0
DATE: 07/30/92 TIME: 10:20:04 IID-920142
-------
HD920143
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 07/31/92 TIME: 09:44:10 PAGE:
'BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
Cms/
Bhphr
HC
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Bag 1 NLLN CS 7.320 9.816
Grams
122.880
Cms/
Bhphr
--- CO
Cms/
Kw-Hr
156.830 210.312
Grams
2632.540
Cms/
Bhphr
— C02
Cms/
Kw-Hr
561.41 752.8/
Grams
9423.90
Cms/
Bhphr
NOx
Cms/
Kw-Hr
3.460 4.640
Grains
58.070
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Fuel
Lbs/
Bhphr
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN CS 1.568 9.686 .577
Measured Fuel Flow: CS 1.710 Gals 10.563 Lbs
t*
5
H
Bag I 1
Length
Bhp-Hr
Dllut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
•
BSFC
NLLN CS
1167. SEC.
16.786
17.196
1173.0
35610.
1
9
Sec.
Cu.Ft.
568 Gal.
BAG DETAIL REPORT
5.92 L.
SITE EMISSION
A009 MEAS
A202 MEAS
A009 MEAS
A009 MRAS
HC
CO
CO^
NOX
urn. r\uttoi
HNC UEFL.
16
22
23
17
.4
.1
1.3
.0
>HU
cote .
1.22
6.93
.024
.00
C.AII/AU
RNG DEKL.
16 70.9
22 29.4
23 26.9
17 13.6
aj
CONC .
212.
2248.
33.
46
78
533
76
i.unnc.i~ i LU
CONCENTRATION
211.31
2242.25
.511
33.76
PPMC
PPM
\
p;-;i
GRAMS
122.88
2632.54
9423.90
58.07
urio/
DIIP-IIH
7.320
156.830
561.414
3.460
69 Lb. 4393.7 Cm
.577 Lb/Bhp-Hr
350.98 Gm/Kw-Hr
n
o
CO
ft
I
10
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flew Difference
CS 9.686 10.563 -8.30*
y-'u 11 J
IB
999
* i'.,;i-:\ivj_' o
C//31/92 TIME: 09:14:10 IIO-92014.J
-------
HD920143
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 07/31/92 TIME: 09:44:09 PAGE:
'ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920143
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HO GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D101
Dyno Operator: 11165 MIKE MATTHEWS
TEST CONDITIONS:
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER350MAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 7-31-92 8:18
Processing Time: 01/31/92 09:44:06
Test Requestor: 13923 TIM DAVIS
Analyzer Operator: 11165 MIKE MATTHEWS
Barometer:
Dew Point-Temperature:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.»:
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Cold Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type:
Alpha(H/C Ratio):
Fuel Specific Gravity:
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel:
COMMENTS:
C/S 12 T90 FUEL
VALIDATION CHECKS:
CONGRATULATIONS!
THIS TEST PASSED CYCLE PERFORMANCE (GAS REGULATIONS) !
28.95 "HG
46.9 F
77.8 F
49.22 grains H2O/lbs. dry air
33.60 %
.8919
One Bag Only
12 Hour Soak.
6 IND UNLEADED, 91 OCT
1.8500
.7416
6.1770
: Torque & BMP standard errors are
-u.. • by t;..; Dlqjlo
-------
H0920144
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
DAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 07/31/92 TIME: 09:54:55 PAGE: 2
HC
Cms/ Cms/
Bhphr Kw-Hr
Cms/
Bhphr
Bag 1 NLLN HS 6.501
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Grains
8.718 108.940 ,v 161.479
--- CO
Gmu/
Kw-Hr
Grams
2706.070
Cms/
Bhphr
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Grains
540.29 72-1.51 9051.23
Cms/
Bhphr
— NOx
Cms/
Kw-Hr
3.117 4.180
Grams
52.230
Lbs/
Bhphr
Fuel
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN HS 1.535 9.479 .566
Measured Fuel Flow: HS 1.620 Gals 10.007 Lbs
BAG DETAIL REPORT
-------
HD920144
999 CRUSADER3SOMAR92 0
IB
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 01/31/92 TIME: 09:54:54 PAGE: 1
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920144
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HD GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D101
Dyno Operator: 11165 MIKE MATTHEWS
TEST CONDITIONS:
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER3SOMAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 7-31-92 8:57
Processing Time: 07/31/92 09:54:51
Tout Requestor: 13923 TIM DAVIS
Analyzer Operator: 13923 TIM DAVIS
Barometer: 28.93 "HG
Dew Point Temperature: 44.9 F
Dry Bulb Temperature: 77.8 F
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.):
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
45.62 grains H2O/lbs. dry air
31.10 I
.8787
Or.e Ua.-j Only
6 IND UNLEADF:D, 91 CCT
1.8500
.7416
6.1770
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type:
Alpha(H/C Ratio) :
Fuel Specific Gravity:
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel:
COMMENTS:
H/S 13 T90 FUEL
VALIDATION CHECKS:
CONGRATULATIONS!
THIS TEST PASSED CYCLE PERFORMANCE (o.-.S ilEGUAnCIJS)
: T:;rqua & BHP standard orr:;rs .1:1; v.-. I hi.it..
SEGMENT LENGTH ACT BHP-HR
01 248 ' 1-420
02 244 3-141
03 304 10.184
04 316 1-412
TOT 316 16.758
"Remark: H/S »3 T90"
REF BHP-HK »
1.393
3.731
10.219
1.396
16.738
SPEED SEG STD.ERR SLOl'E CONST KSQUARU
s i:-4.:; i:sss -- ••»*»•
Hi? !:SS iff. :KS
10T 19.672 1.00370 -.980 .99967
TORQUE SEG
01
02
03
04
10T
HP SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
STD.ESR SLOPE
3.806%
4.669%
4.454%
3.514%
4.241%
STC . ERi<
2.137%
3.3571
3.732%
1 .900%
3.020%
.94589
.93590
.93438
.94835
.95095
SLOPE
.96089
.97040
.94590
.96897
.97150
CONST
1.658
2.361
3.918
1.385
1.998
CONST
.592
.869
2.828
.410
.859
RSCUARE
.98099
.97807
.98103
.98263
.98538
RSCUARE
.98252
.98318
.98433
.98452
.98920
ui r r
1.94
.27
-.34
1.15
.12
ML; 12 1-'. -i
218
2-14
304
316
316
IJL;U;: -
2-K
307
304
316
273
;:;;!.:.' •
2 '.•!
2-: i
301
31.';
2V 3
i 1 i T
.6
.(.
.6
.6
.6
: 1 1 .• T
. O
. c
.6
.(,
f
. *J
IjiI.-T
. L.
. c
.6
.C
. 6
(8
0
CO
tt
U)
4,'
'u, M
111
CHlJi/.ul !•: i -./:•:-'.U'J.'
DA'ic: U//JI/92 TIME: l)9:'j-;:55 IID-92U144
-------
HD92014S
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 07/31/92 TIME: 10:54:38 PAGE:
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-92014S
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HO GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: 0101
Dyno Operator: 11165 MIKE MATTHEWS
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.O.: CRUSADER3SOMAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
Engine Test Clas:
Test Date/Time:
Processing Time:
TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
7-31-92 9:34
07/31/92 10:S4:3:>
28.93 "HG
45.1 F
77.1 F
45.97 grains H20/lbs. dry air
32.10 %
.8800
One Bag Only
6 IND UNLEADED, 91 OUT
1.8500
.7416
6.1770
Test Requestor: 13923 TIM DAVIS
Analyzer Operator: 11165 MIKE MATTHEWS
TEST CONDITIONS:
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.):
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type:
Alpha(H/C Ratio):
Fuel Specific Gravity:
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel:
COMMENTS:
H/S 14 T90 FUEL
VALIDATION CHECKS:
CONGRATULATIONS!
THIS TEST PASSED CYCLE PERFORMANCE (GAS HEGUIAI'ICMS)!
: Torque 4 BHP standard errors aro validated Ly i.:.,. L.ic}.ii.:rj
SEGMENT LENGTH ACT BHP-HR REF BHP-HR % DIFF
01
02
03
04
TOT
248
244
304
316
316
"Remark: H/S 14
SPEED
TORQUE
HP
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
STD.
17.
18.
24.
14.
19.
STD.
3.
4.
4.
3.
4,
STD
2
3
3
1
2
1.417
3.736
10.165
1.415
16.734
1 .393
3.731
10.219
1.396
16.738
1 .72
.13
-.53
1 .36
-.02
T90"
ERR
550
947
310
248
621
ERR
764*
7061
196%
,670*
.192*
.ERR
.093%
.432%
.493%
.936%
.955%
SLOPE
1.00791
1.00534
1.00221
1.00901
1.00293
SLOPE
.94534
.93480
.93850
.94306
.95029
SLOPE
.96066
.96895
.94876
.96627
.97106
CONST
-5.504
-4.813
-1.997
-6.880
-1.141
CONST
1.63b
2.391
3.605
1.583
2.021
CONST
.580
.669
2.584
.443
.833
RSQUARE
.99933
.99962
.99893
.99939
.99967
RSCUAP.E
. 98 1 38
.97768
.98327
.98087
.98569
RSCUARE
.98320
.98239
.98633
. 983H6
.9B969
NS12E
248
244
304
316
316
NSI7.E
244
307
304
316
273
Nol/F.
244
244
3C4
316
2/3
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
. 6
. 0
.6
.6
.6
sniri
.c
. 6
.6
.6
.6
00
J
I
«o
o
I
H
W
O
It
(0
ft
it
llu-9201
990
il/92 TIMr:
-------
HD920145
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
Bag 1 NLLN HS
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 0//J1/92 TIME: 10:54:39 PAGE:
Cms/
Bhphr
6.710
m. —
Cms/
Kw-Hr
8.998
Grams
112.280
Cms/
Bhphr
163.045
I.U -
Gms/
Kw-Hr
218.647
Grams
2728.390
Gms/
Bhphr
547.74
l_U£ •
Gms/
Kw-Hr
73^.53
Grams
9165.87
Gms/
Bhphr
3.179
NUX -
Gms/
Kw-Hr
4.263
Grams
53.200
Fuel
Lbs/
Bhphr
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN HS 1.552 9.588 .573
Measured Fuel Flow: HS 1.670 Gals 10.316 Lbs
BAG DETAIL REPORT
Bag I 1 NLL
Length
Bhp-Hr
Dllut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
*
BSFC
N HS
1167.
16.734
17.202
1173.0
35690.
1.552
9.59
.573
348.54
SEC.
Sec.
Cu.Fc.
Gal. 5.86 L.
Lb. 4349.2 Gra
Lb/Bhp-Hr
Cm/ Kw-Hr
SITE
A009
A202
A009
A009
EMISSION
MEAS HC
MEAS CO
MEAS C.02
MEAS NOX
'
RNG
16
22
23
17
-ll/V-IMjKl
DEFL.
1.8
.1
1.8
.0
JUHU
CONC.
5.49
6.93
.033
.00
r.Anstu
RNG DEFL.
16 66.0
22 30.3
23 26.6
17 12.6
O 1
CONC.
197.82
2325.21
.527
31.27
i,i_jrvnc.i~ i C.U
CONCENTRATION
192.65 PPMC
2318.68 PPM
.496 %
31.27 Pl'M
GRAMS
112.28
2728.39
9165.87
53.20
Ul l~l /
BHP-HR
6.710
163.045
547.739
3.179
J
I
o
2
H
I
CO
ct
5
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow Difference
Ml, 9.588 10.316 -7.05*
1U
CKUSADE1
-------
HD920157
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB CS1G
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 08/25/92 TIME: 01:37:42 PAGE:
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920157
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HD GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D101
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER350MAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
TEST CONDITIONS:
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Humidity (Aba.I:
Humidity (Rel.):
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Cold Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type:
Alpha(H/C Ratio):
Fuel Specific Gravity:
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel:
29.30 "HG
SB. 4 F
76.4 F
74.68 grains H2O/lbs. dry air
53.70 %
.9985
One Bag Only
19 GASOHOL
2.0859
.8239
6.8620
COMMENTS:
1ST COLD START GASAHOL FULL t/M
VALIDATION CHECKS:
: This test passed cycle performance (Gasoline Regulations)
: Torque t BHP standard errors are validated by the Dlgalog
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 8-24-92 12:58
Processing Time: 08/25/92 07:37:39
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 13923 TIM DAVIS
SEGMENT LENGTH
ACT BHP-HR REF BHP-HR
01
02
03
04
TOT
248
245
307
316
316
1.456
3.670
10.027
1.418
16.570
400
697
10.097
1.407
16.601
•Remark: 1ST COLD START FULL E/M GASOHOL"
% DIFF
4.00
-.73
-.69
.78
-.19
O
I
SPEED SEG STD.ERR SLOPE
CONST RSQUARE NSI2E SHIFT
TORQUE
HP
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
16
17
25
13
19
STD
8
5
5
4
6
STD
4
4
4
2
4
.309
.833
.923
.115
.468
.ERR
.875%
.606%
.480%
.468%
.305%
.ERR
.374%
.323%
.935%
.353%
.277%
1.00558
1.00284
.99979
1.00527
1.00051
SLOPE
.92758
.89394
.90310
.91406
.92443
SLOPE
.98364
.93487
.91273
.92857
.95100
-4
-3
-
-4
-
.677
.855
.916
.791
.277
CONST
2
3
5
2
3
.408
.533
.748
.376
.034
CONST
1
4
1
.713
.416
.431
.782
.344
.99942
.99967
.99678
.99948
.99968
RSQUARE
.89240
.96466
.96836
.97007
.96534
RSQUARE
.93109
.97037
.97090
.97S56
.9H92
248
245
307
316
316
NS1ZE
245
307
307
316
273
NSIZE
245
245
307
316
273
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
O
o
CO
ft
HD-920157
IB CS1G
999 CRUSADEI
-------
HD920157
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB CS1G
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 08/25/92 TIME: 07:37:43 PAGE:
Cms/
Bhphr
HC
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Bag 1 NLLN CS 8.941 11.990
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Fuel
Grams
148.160
Lbs/
Bhphr
CO
Cms/ Cms/
Bhphr Kw-Hr Grains
151.155 202.702 2504.640
Cms/
Bhphr
C02
Cms/
Kw-Hr
570.72 765.35
Grams
9456.84
NOx
Cms/ Cms/
Bhphr Kw-Hr Grams
3.851 5.164
63.810
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN CS 1.426 9.784 .590
Measured Fuel Flow: CS 1.710 Gals 11.734 Lbs
I
H
BAG DETAIL REPORT
Bag 1 1 NLU
Length
Bhp-Hr
Dilut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
n
BSFC
g
1 CS
1167. SEC.
16.570
17.076
1173.0 Sec.
36010. Cu.Ft.
1.426 Gal. 5.39 L
9.78 Lb. 4437.8 Gm
.590 Lb/Bhp-Hr
358.88 Gm/ Kw-Hr
SITE
A009
A009
A009
A009
EMISSION
MEAS HC
MEAS CO
MEAS C02
MEAS NOX
RNG
16
22
23
17
DEFL.
1.2
.0
2.4
.0
JUNU
CONC.
3.66
.00
.044
.00
RNG
16
22
23
17
--tAtWU
DEFL.
85.2
26.2
27.6
13.2
,a,
CONC
255.
2109.
.
32.
40
62
548
76
i.wnnc.1. i c.u
CONCENTRATION
251.95 PPMC
2109.62 PPM
.507 %
32.76 PPM
GRAMS
148.16
2504.64
9456.84
63.81
uru /
BHP-I1R
8.941
151.155
570.720
3.851
O
O
K
s
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow Difference
CS 9.784 11.734 -16.62*
HD-9201b7
IB CS1G
999 CRUSADEH3SOMAR92 0
DATE: 08/25/92 TIME: 07:37:43 HD-920157
-------
HD920158
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB HS1G
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 08/25/92 TIME: 01:42:59 PAGE: 1
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HO-9201S8
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HD GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D101
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER350MAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
TEST CONDITIONS:
29.29 "KG
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature: 57.1 F
Dry Bulb Temperature: 77.8 F
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.):
NOx Corr. Factor:
71.24 grains H20/lbs. dry air
46.90 %
.9826
One Bag Only
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type: 19 GASOHOL
Alpha(H/C Ratio): 2.0859
Fuel Specific Gravity: .8239
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel: 6.8620
COMMENTS:
HOT START I 1 GASOHOL FULL E/M
VALIDATION CHECKS:
: This test passed cycle performance (Gasoline Regulations).
: Torque t BHP standard errors are validated by the Dlgalog.
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT -
Test Date/Time: 8-24-92 13:36
Processing Time: 08/25/92 07:42:56
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 13923 TIM DAVIS
SEGMENT LENGTH
ACT BHP-HR REF BHP-HR
% DIFF
01
02
03
04
TOT
248
246
307
316
316
1.419
3.683
10.018
1.417
16.537
400
697
1
10.097
1.407
16.601
.36
.38
.78
.71
.39
•Remark: 1ST HOT START FULL E/M GASOHOL"
SPEED SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST RSQLIARE NS1ZE SHIFT
TORQUE
HP
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
15.906
18. 083
26.458
12.689
19.570
STD.ERR
4.690%
5.5571
5.657%
4.594%
5.319%
STD.ERR
2.665%
4.256%
5.033%
2.380%
3.985%
1.00382
1.00153
.99864
1.00400
.99923
SLOPE
.90684
.89208
.90479
.91364
.92153
SLOPE
.91684
.93503
.91200
.92717
.94655
-3.922
-3.597
-.962
-4.543
-.046
CONST
2.679
3.792
5.658
2.344
3.161
CONST
1.028
1.498
4.419
.778
1.397
.99945
.99966
.99872
.99951
.99967
RSQUARE
.96888
.9(J512
.96648
.96842
.97507
RSQUARE
.97185
.97127
.96972
.97501
.9(1062
248
246
307
316
316
NSIZE
246
307
307
316
273
NSIZE
246
246
307
316
273
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
10
O
!
H
5
CA
Ct
I
HD-920JbB
IB HS1G
999 CRUSAIJLirjbCMAR92 0
DATE: 08/25/92 TIME: 07:43:00 HD-920iS3
-------
HD920158
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB HS1G
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 08/25/92 TIME: 07:43:00 PAGE:
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
Cms/
Bhphr
HC
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Grains
Bag 1 NLLN HS 7.718 10.350 127.640
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
CO
Cms/ Cms/
Bhphr Kw-Hr Grams
138.895 186.261 2296.910
Cms/
Bhphr
C02
Cms/
Kw-Hr
568.05 761.77
Grains
9393.86
Cms/
Bhphr
NOx
Gms/
Kw-Hr
Grams
4.084 5.477 67.540
Lbs/
Bhphr
Fuel
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN HS 1.379 9.463 .572
Measured Fuel Flow: HS 1.650 Gals 11.322 Lbs
BAG DETAIL REPORT
Bag I 1 NLLN HS
Length
Bhp-Hr
Dllut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
BSFC
1167. SEC.
16.537
17.672
1173.0 Sec.
Cu.Ft.
379 Gal.
35990
1
SITE
A009
A009
A009
A009
EMISSION
MEAS HC
MEAS CO
MEAS C02
MEAS NOX
— — - . ,
RNG
16
22
23
17
~i3ftk,i\um
DEFL.
1.9
.1
2.2
.1
junu
CONC.
5.79
7.02
.040
.25
RNG
16
22
23
17
•-tAflnU
DEFL.
74.3
24.3
27.3
14.3
31
CONC
222.
1942.
t
35.
t
64
34
542
50
l.UIMU.1, 1 C.U
CONCENTRATION
217.18 PPMC
1935.72 PPM
.504 t
35.26 PPM
GRAMS
127.64
2296.91
9393.86
67.54
uno/
BHP-HR
7.718
138.895
568.051
4.084
5.21 L.
9.46 Lb. 4292.6 Cm
.572 Lb/Bhp-Hr
347.93 Gm/Kw-Hr
CO
ft
5
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow Difference
HS 9.464 11.322 -16.42*
HD-920158
IB HS1G
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
DATE: 08/25/92 TIME: 07:43:00 HD-920158
-------
HD920159
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB HS2G
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 08/25/92 TIME: 07:48:21 PAGE: 1
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-9201S9
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HO GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: DIOI
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER350MAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
29.28 "HG
51.2 F
78.2 F
57.26 grains H20/lbs. dry air
38.90 %
.9230
One Bag Only
TEST CONDITIONS:
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.):
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type: 19 GASOHOL
Alpha(H/C Ratio): 2.0859
Fuel Specific Gravity: .8239
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel: 6.8620
COMMENTS:
HOT START « 2 GASOHOL FULL E/M
VALIDATION CHECKS:
: This test passed cycle performance (Gasoline Regulations).
: Torque I BHP standard errors are validated by the Dlgalog.
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 8-24-92 14:14
Processing Time: 08/25/92 07:48:18
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 13923 TIM DAVIS
SEGMENT LENGTH
ACT BHP-HR REF BHP-HR
01
02
03
04
TOT
248
246
307
316
316
1.415
3.669
9.997
1.408
16.489
1.400
3.697
10.097
1.407
16.601
% D1FF
1.07
-.76
-.99
.07
-.67
"Remark: 2ND HOT START FULL E/M GASOHOL"
SPEED SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST RSQUAHE NSIZE SHUT
TORQUE
HP
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
12.288
15.460
23.216
10.909
16.852
STD.ERR
4.152%
5.238%
5.171%
4.240%
4.915%
STD.ERR
2.290%
3.909%
4.593%
2.111%
3.631%
1.00356
1.00112
' .99819
1.00416
.99878
SLOPE
.90652
.89308
.90573
.91168
.92200
SLOPE
.92208
.93599
.91280
.92825
.94699
-4.615
-4.270
-1.605
-5.538
-.534
CONST
2.599
3.597
5.556
2.282
3.048
CONST
.962
1.406
4.297
.745
1.335
. <>9967
.'.(9975
.09901
.99964
.99976
RSQUARE
.97542
.96895
.97189
.97287
.97865
RSQUARE
.97930
.97570
.97469
.98027
.98388
248
246
307
316
316
NSI2E
246
307
307
316
273
NSI2E
246
246
307
316
273
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
10
o
(0
rt
I
IB HS2G
999 CKUSAUt:H.'t$UMAR92 0
DATE: 08/25/92 TIME: 07:48:22 HD-920159
-------
H09201S9
999 CRUSAOER350MAR92 0
IB HS2G
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 08/25/92 TIME: 07:48:22 PAGE: 2
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
GUIS/
Bhphr
—T- HC
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Grams
Cms/
Bhphr
CO
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Bag 1 NLLN HS 7.635 10.239 125.890 138.822 186.163
Grams
2289.030
Cms/
Bhphr
C02
Cms/
Kw-Hr
561.88 753.49
Grams
9264.86
Cms/
Bhphr
— NOx
Gms/
Kw-Hr
3.714 4.981
Grams
61.240
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Fuel
Lbs/
Bhphr
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN HS 1.364 9.360 .568
Measured Fuel Flow: HS 1.640 Gals 11.254 Lbs
BAG DETAIL REPORT
Bag I 1
Length
Bhp-Hr
Dllut. Factor
Bag Fill Tine
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
•
BSFC
NLLN HS
1167. SEC.
16.489
17.881
1173.0 Sec.
35990. Cu.Ft.
1.364 Gal. 5
9.36 Lb. 4245
.568 Lb/Bhp-Hr
345.50 Gm/Kw-Hr
15 L.
5 Gm
SITE
A009
A009
A009
A009
— a/Av~r\uKvjunu fcAnAUo I
EMISSION
MEAS HC
MEAS CO
MEAS C02
MEAS NOX
RNG
16
22
23
17
DEFL.
2.1
.2
2.1
.2
CONC.
6.40
14.05
.038
.50
RNG
16
22
23
17
DEFL.
73.5
24.3
26.9
13.9
CONC.
220.25
1942.34
.533
34.50
CORRECTED
CONCENTRATION
214.20 PPMC
1929.08 PPM
.497 %
34.04 PPM
GRAMS
125.89
2289.03
9264.86
61.24
CMS/
BHP-HR
7.635
138.822
561.881
3.714
CO
ct
I
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow Difference
HS 9.360 11.254 -16.83*
1U HS2G
999 CKUSADi:H:j'jOMAR92 0
DATE: 08/25/92 TIME: 07:48:22 HD-920159
-------
HD920160
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0.
IB CS2G
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: OB/2V92 TIME: 10:53:07 PAGE: 1
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920160
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HO GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D101
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER350MAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
TEST CONDITIONS:
29.29 "HG
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature: 52.3 F
Dry Bulb Temperature: 78.2 F
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.l:
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Cold Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type:
Alpha(H/C Ratio):
Fuel Specific Gravity:
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel:
59.65 grains H2O/lbs. dry air
40.50 %
.9321
One Bag Only
19 GASOHOL
2.0859
.8239
6.8620
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 8-25-92 8:36
Processing Time: 08/25/92 10:53:04
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 13923 TIM DAVIS
SEGMENT LENGTH ACT BHP-HR REF BHP-HR % DIFF
1.07
.62
-.70
.57
-.17
01
02
03
04
TOT
248
246
307
316
316
1.457
3.674
10.026
1.415
16.572
1.400
3.697
10.097
1.40)
16.601
•Remark: COLD START I 2 FULL E/M GASOHOL"
SPEED SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST RSQUARE NSIZE SHIFT
COMMENTS:
COLD START I 2 FULL E/M GASOHOL
VALIDATION CHECKS:
: This test passed cycle performance (Gasoline Regulations).
: Torque t BHP standard errors are validated by the Dlgalog.
TORQUE
HP
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
13.
15.
24.
11.
17.
STD.
6.
5.
5.
4.
5.
STD.
3.
3.
4.
2.
342
780
021
000
436
ERR
269%
312%
127%
155%
365%
ERR
319%
900%
573%
123%
3.795%
1.00639
1.00319
1.00023
1.00610
1.00085
SLOPE
.92744
.89500
.90276
.91649
.92526
SLOPE
.97510
.93853
.91167
.93319
.95157
-5
-4
-1
-5
-
.522
.328
.868
.735
.726
CONST
2
3
5
2
2
.473
.473
.792
.205
.989
CONST
1
4
1
.731
.366
.504
.736
.329
.99961
.99974
.991)95
.991)63
.99974
RSQUARE
.94470
.96824
.97218
.97417
.97474
RSQUARE
.95898
.97593
.97485
.98026
.98255
246
246
307
316
316
NSIZE
246
307
307
316
273
NSIZE
246
246
307
316
273
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
10
10
I
o
H
9
H
O
O
CO
ft
5
10
HD-920160
IB CS2G
999 CRUSADEIU50MAR92 0
DATE: 08/25/92 TIME: 10:53:08 HD-920160
-------
HD920160
999 CRUSAOER350MAR92 0
IB CS2G
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 08/25/92 TIME: 10:53:08 PAGE:
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
HC
Cms/ 'Cats/
Bhphr Kw-Hr Grams
Bag 1 NLLN CS 8.735 11.714 144.760
Cms/
Bhphr
CO
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Grams
147.135 197.311 2438.320
Cms/
Bhphr
— C02
Cms/
Kw-Hr
574.47 770.38
Grams
9520.12
Cms/
Bhphr
— NOx
Cms/
Kw-Hr
3.640 4.881
Grains
60.330
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Fuel
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN CS 1.420 9.747 .588
Measured Fuel Flow: CS 1.690 Gals 11.597 Lbs
Lbs/
Bhphr
9
I
O
H
BAG DETAIL REPORT
Bag 11 NLLr
Length
Bhp-Hr
Ollut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
N
BSFC
4 CS
1167. SEC.
16.572
17.172
1171.0 Sec.
35960. Cu.Ft.
1.420 Gal. 5.37 L.
9.75 Lb. 4421.3 Cm
.568 Lb/Bhp-Hr
357.67 Gm/Kw-Hr
SITE EMISSION
A009 MEAS HC
A009 MEAS CO
A009 MEAS C02
A009 MEAS NOX
RNG DEFL.
16
22
22
15
1.1
.0
4.7
.1
CONC.
3.35
.00
.041
.05
RNG
16
22
22
15
— c. Annual
DEFL.
83.3
25.6
58.3
66.8
CONC
249.
2056.
t
33.
i~urti\c.i- i c.u L»n3 /
CONCENTRATION
67
61
550
26
246.51
2056.61
.511
33.21
PPMC
PPM
I
PPM
GRAMS
144
2438
9520
60
.76
.32
.12
.33
BHP-HR
8.735
147.135
574.470
3.640
O
O
H
a
CO
ft
5
10
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow Difference
cs 9.747 11.59/ -15.95*
Ib CS2G
999 CRUSADtiHJ!:aMAR92 0
DATE: 08/25/92 TIME: 10:53:08 HD-920160
-------
HD920170
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB HS3G
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 08/25/92 TIME: 10;b8:37 PAGE: 1
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HO-920170
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HO GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D101
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER350MAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
TEST CONDITIONS:
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Humidity (Abs.l:
Humidity (Rel.):
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type:
Alpha(H/C Ratio):
Fuel Specific Gravity:
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel:
29.29 -HG
55.7 F
78.2 F
67.67 grains H20/lbs. dry air
45.90 %
.9667
One Bag Only
19 GASOHOL
2.0859
.8239
6.6620
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 8-25-92 9:15
Processing Time: 08/25/92 10:58:34
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 13923 TIM DAVIS
K)
U)
SEGMENT LENGTH
ACT BHP-HR REF BHP-HR
01
02
03
04
TOT
248
246
307
316
316
1.457
3.674
10.026
1.415
16.572
1.400
3.697
10.097
1.407
16.601
% DIFF
4.07
-.62
-.70
.57
-.17
•Remark: HOT START I 3 FULL E/M GASOHOL"
SPEED SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST RSOUARE NS1ZE SHIFT
COMMENTS:
HOT START I 3 FULL E/M GASOHOL
VALIDATION CHECKS:
: This test passed cycle performance (Gasoline Regulations).
: Torque t BHP standard errors are validated by the Dlgalog.
TORQUE
HP
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
13
15
24
11
17
STD
6
5
5
4
5
STD
3
3
4
2
3
.342
.780
.021
.000
.436
.ERR
.269%
.312%
.127%
.155%
.365%
.ERR
.319%
.900%
.573%
.123%
.795%
1
1
1
1
1
.00639
.00319
.00023
.00610
.00085
SLOPE
.92744
.89500
.90276
.91649
.92526
SLOPE
.97510
.93853
.91167
.93319
.95157
-5.
-4.
-1.
-5.
-.
522
328
868
735
726
CONST
2.
3.
5.
2.
2.
473
473
792
205
989
CONST
1.
4.
.
1.
731
366
504
736
329
.99961
.99974
.99895
.99963
.99974
RSQUARE
.94470
.96824
.97218
.97417
.97474
RSQUARE
.95898
.97593
.97485
.98026
.98255
248
246
307
316
316
NSIZE
246
307
307
316
273
NSIZE
246
246
307
316
273
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
3
5
HD-920170
IB HS3G
999 CRUSADEH350MAR92 0
DATE: 08/25/92 TIME: 10:58:38 HD-920170
-------
HD920170
999 CRUSADER3SOMAR92 0
IB HS3G
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 08/25/92 TIME: 10:58:38 PAGE:
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
Cms/
Bhphr
HC
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Bag 1 NLLN HS 7.363 9.874
Grams
122.030
CO
Gits/ Cms/
Bhphr Kw-Hr Grams
, 135.945 182.305 2252.870
Cms/
Bhphr
C02
Cms/
Kw-Hr
559.65 750.50
Grams
9274.49
Cms/
Bhphr
— NOx
Cms/
Kw-Hr
3.827 5.132
Grams
63.430
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Fuel
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN US 1.358 9.318 .562
Measured Fuel Flow: HS 1.630 Gals 11.185 Lbs
Lbs/
Bhphr
f
BAG DETAIL REPORT
Bag « 1
Length
Bhp-Hr
Dlluc. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
n
BSFC
NLLN HS
1167. SEC.
16.572
17.947
1172.0 Sec.
35990.
Cu.Ft.
1.358 Gal. 5.13 L.
9.32 Lb. 4226.6 Gm
.562 Lb/Bhp-Hr
341.85 Gm/Ku-Hr
--U/U.MJKUUHU- - tAiimjoi - --
SITE
A009
A009
A009
A009
EMISSION
MEAS HC
MEAS CO
MEAS C02
MEAS NOX
RNG
16
22
22
15
DEFL.
2.2
.0
4.6
.0
CONC
6.
.
.
71
00
040
00
RNG
16
22
22
15
DEFL.
71.4
23.8
56.9
67.6
CONC.
213.96
1898.61
.535
33.66
V«l-/rW\IL>\~ 1 C.LS
CONCENTRATION
207.63 PPMC
1898.61 PPM
.497 %
33.66 PPM
GRAMS
122.03
2252.87
9274.49
63.43
VJI l*4/
BHP-HR
7.363
135.945
559.648
3.827
€0
ft
&
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow Difference
"S 9.318 11.185 -16.69*
HD-9201 10
1U HS3G
999 CRUSAUk:i<3'jOMAH92 0
DATE: OB/25/92 TIME: 10:58:38 IID-920170
-------
HD920171
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB HS4G
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 08/25/92 TIME: 11:04:27 PAGE: 1
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920171
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HO GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D101
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER350MAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
TEST CONDITIONS:
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Humidity (Aba.):
Humidity (Rel.):
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
29.28 "HG
55.9 F
78.5 F
68.19 grains H20/lbs. dry air
45.60 %
.9690
Hot Start Only One Bag Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type: 19 GASOHOL
Alpha(H/C Ratio): 2.0859
Fuel Specific Gravity: .8239
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel: 6.8620
COMMENTS:
HOT START I 4 FULL E/M GASOHOL
VALIDATION CHECKS:
: This test passed cycle performance (Gasoline Regulations).
: Torque t BHP standard errors are validated by the Dlgalog.
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 8-25-92 9:54
Processing Time: 08/25/92 11:04:24
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 13923 TIM DAVIS
SEGMENT LENGTH ACT BHP-HR REF BHP-HR
01
02
03
04
TOT
248
246
307
316
316
1.403
3.674
10.012
1.411
16.500
1.400
3.697
10.097
1.407
16.601
% OUT
.21
-.62
-.84
.28
-.61
"Remark: HOT START I 4 FULL E/M GASOHOL"
SPEED SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST RSQUARE NSUE SHIFT
TORQUE
HP
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
13.
15.
22.
11.
16.
STD.
4.
5.
5.
4.
4.
STD.
2.
3.
4.
2.
3.
038
166
605
180
703
ERR
184%
165%
1651
295%
913%
ERR
302%
815%
514%
112%
573%
1.00412
1.00117
.99817
1.00456
.99886
SLOPE
.90531
.89546
.91028
.91750
.92517
SLOPE
.92028
.93880
.91764
.93307
.95009
-5
-4
-1
-6
-
.512
.383
.783
.254
.864
CONST
2
3
5
2
2
.452
.623
.356
.141
.946
CONST
1
4
1
.883
.387
.116
.702
.269
.99963
.99976
.99907
.99962
.99976
RSQUARE
.97498
.96994
.97223
.97252
.97881
RSQUAHE
.97900
.97696
.97579
.98044
.98448
248
246
307
316
316
NSIZE
246
307
307
316
273
NSIZE
246
246
307
316
273
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
f
I
H
I
CO
It
HD-920171
IB HS4G
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
DATE: 08/25/92 TIME: 11:04:28 HD-920171
-------
HD920171
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB HS4G
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: Ob/25/92 TIME: 11:04:28 PAGE:
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
Bag 1 NLLN HS
HC -
Cms/ Cms/
Bhphr Kw-Hr
7.395 9.917
Grans
122.020
Cms/
Bhphr
— CO
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Grams
138.769 186.092 2289.690
Cms/
Bhphr
— C02
Cms/
Kw-Hr
561.00 752.32
Grams
9256.53
Cms/
Bhphr
NOx
Cms/
Kw-Hr
3.795 5.089
Grains
62.610
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Fuel
Lbs/
Bhphr
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN HS 1.362 9.346 .566
Measured Fuel Flow: HS 1.630 Gals 11.185 Lbs
BAG DETAIL REPORT
Bag I 1 NLLN HS
Length
Bhp-Hr
Dllut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consunp.
u
BSFC
1167. SEC.
16.500
17.864
1172.0 Sec.
36040. Cu.Ft.
1.362 Gal. 5.15 L.
9'. 35 Lb. 4239.3 Gm
.566 Lb/Bhp-Hr
344.28 Gm/Kw-Hr
SITE EMISSION
A009 MEAS HC
A009 MEAS CO
A009 MEAS C02
A009 MEAS NOX
*
3ftl~I\ljItm,
RNG DEFL.
16
22
22
15
2.2
.1
4.8
.0
JiHJ — — —
CONC.
6.71
7.02
.042
.00
— — — —
RNG
16
22
22
15
"""tAiiAU
DEFL.
71.3
24.2
56.9
66.5
ii
CONC
213.
1933.
.
33.
LUKKt
A-TKI
J
CONCENTRATION
66
59
535
10
207.
1926.
.
33.
33
96
496
10
PPMC
PPM
%
PPM
GRAMS
122.02
2289.69
9256.53
62.61
GMS/
BHP-HR
7.395
138.769
561.002
3.795
I
H
I
I
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow Difference
HS 9.346 11.185 -16.441
HU-9201
IB HS4G
999 CRUSADt:U3bOMAR92 0
DATE: 08/25/92 TIME: 11:04:28 HD-920171
-------
HD9201B1
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB IIS1B
HEAVY ci;;v .:V.;oi.iik: TRANSIENT TEST
AIJ.'II :ii STRATI VK REPORT
I,A it:: ./iA,3/'.)2 TIME: 11:01:12 PACE:
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920181
Test Typo: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HD GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D101
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
TEST CONDITIONS:
Barometer: 28.95 "11G
Dew Point Temperature: 47.7 F
Dry Bulb Temperature: 78.9 F
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.l:
NOx Corr. Factor:
Manufacturer: 'J9-) i./.l-. KIMI-'NTAI.
Engine 1.0.: CRUS/>i;r:iO'jOMAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: JbC
CVS Typo: CFV
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type:
Alpha(H/C Ratio):
Fuel Specific Gravity:
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel:
50.74 grains 1120/lbs. dry ait
33.40 I
.8977
Ono BJIJ Only
5 I NO UNLEADED, 96 OCT
1.8655
.7432
6.1900
COMMENTS:
HOT START I 1
( 20 % BLEND FOR DAVE G )
VALIDATION CHECKS:
: This test passed cycle performance U^soi i .".•• .• ; . ,,r. I,.:,L;I .
: Torque & BMP standard errors .ire v.ilicuic.i : y ': DI.J.I i i..j.
Emjlne Tom ;: I. .:
Test Date/Time:
Processing T I rr.e :
Test Koqi.osi :.r :
Analyser Gp;:[\;r. .
TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
9- 3-92 9:17
09/03/92 11:01:09
•i(i4.12 JOE HUKI.F.Y
13923 TIM DAVIS
Ui
SEGMENT LENGTH ACT BHP-IIR REF BIIP-HR
01 248 1.429 1.427
02 245 3.774 3. 773
03 305 10.264 10.305
04 316 1.463 1.4)1
TOT 307 16.930 16.9)6
"Remark: 1ST HOT START 20 1 HI. END KM DAVE ((,)
SPEED
TORQUE
HP
sir,
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
10T
STD
IU.
22.
21 .
17.
20.
STD .
3,
4.
4.
3.
4.
STD ,
1 .
3
3
1
2
. ERR
,547
.'/.IU
.260
.464
,494
.ERR
,796*
. 5 /6%
,194%
,630%
.173%
.ERR
.9631
.007%
.455%
.561%
.764%
SLOPE
1 .008/9
1 .00609
1 .00343
1 .00967
1 .00393
SLOPE
.937Gb
.93332
.93034
.94783
.94838
SLOPE
.96342
.97267
.93951
.97373
.97128
CONST
-5.121
-4. 140
-2.134
-6.029
-.758
CONST
1 .40/
2. 102
4.071
1.563
1 .922
CONST
.401
.694
"J . 1 64
.456
.814
RSQUAKE
. 9'.i92i,
.9'»94b
.99918
.99908
.99965
KSWWKi:
.9HOII4
.9/8 16
.98244
.98153
.98525
RSQUARE
. 9ti593
.90662
.98613
.99006
.99078
% DIFF
.14
.03
-.40
2.24
- . 0 'i
NM/.I
/48
2 -1 '.)
'105
316
3C7
NSI U.
:>A\,
10 /
305
307
273
NS1/E
245
245
305
30 /
271
Shll I'
. ti
. tl
.b
.8
.t)
SHIFT
. tl
.1)
.0
.b
.8
SHIM
.11
. tl
.tl
.11
.11
20% Btlxanol Bl
§
P.
u
C
9
H
M
S
CO
ft
M
fT
4k
H
110-9^01111
-------
111)920181
999 CRUSADER350MAK92 0
IB HS1B
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
Bag 1 NLLN HS
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Baq 1 NLLN HS 1.52V 9.453 . !.bH
Measured Fuel Flow: HS 1.740 Gals 10.77) l.bs
HEAVY l;l;i: '..liOl.ltii: 'I KANS IKNT TEST
»/••:. i Mission.-; REPORT
UAIi.: '-;'i.'o l/'i2 'ril-U1.: 11:01:11 PAGE:
Cms/
Bhphr
7.476
1:
Gals
Cms/
Kw-Hr
10.025
Lbs
;.(J t u^ N(JX
Gms/ Gmi,/ Gra^/ Gmi;/ Gins/ Cms/
Grams Bhphr Kw-lir Gr^m:; Uhphr Kw-Hr Gi Bhphr Kw-Hr Grdrn^
126.570 13). 483 i/'i.i;C.", :;2'j9.8/0 'j.'.'J.bJ 7f,4.lL> 964 /.,:u 4 . 1 9'J b.f>31 71.10U
Lbs/
Bhphr
ilA.. l;ETAIl. KEl'OKT
Baq I I
NLLN HS
LemjUi
Bhp-Hr
Dilut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
ii
BSFC
1167. SEC.
16.930
17.322
1172.0 Sec.
35610. Cu.Ft.
1.527 Gal. 5.77 L.
9.45 l.b. 4287.9 Gm
.558 Lb/Bhp-Hr
339.42 Gm/Kw-Hr
SITE EM IS:
AGO 9 MEAS
A009 MEAS
A009 MEAS
A009 MEAS
ilUI
lie;
CO
co.>
tiox
i.;i;; lit
16
22
23
15
::n..
.9
.0
'± . \
.1
CONC .
2. /b
.00
.03H
.05
KNG
16
22
23
15
-C.AIIMU
DEFL.
73.5
24. 1
28.1
82.3
O 1
220. 2!j
1924.83
.559
•11.11
v^W|M\[.l- 1 l.H
CONCENTRAl'ION GKAMS
217.66
1924.83
.52)
41 .07
PPMC
PPM
%
PI'M
126.57
2259.87
9647.20
71 .10
*•« U/
BIIP-IIR
7.476
133.483
569.829
4.199
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BAIANCE COMPARED Tu MEASUW.l) i Ui.i tlGVJ:
Carbon Balance Mojsur.-'l Fu.-'i I-l«.w Dltlorenco
HS 9.453 10. / /, -12.23%
liD-'J/.. IU1
IB HSU)
l;/.h: .,--•/l l/;J2 ilMi': 11:01:1') IID-Vl) I 81
-------
HD9201B2
999 CRUSADER350HAR92 0
IB HS2B
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 09/03/92 TIME: 13:30:51 PAGE: 1
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920182
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HO GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D101
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER350MAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
28.95 "HG
52.1 F
78.5 F
59.90 grains H2O/lbs. dry air
39.90 %
.9337
One Bag Only
TEST CONDITIONS:
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.):
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type: 5 IND UNLEADED, 96 OCT
Alpha(H/C Ratio): 1.8655
Fuel Specific Gravity: .7432
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel: 6.1900
COMMENTS:
HOT START 12 < 20 % BLEND FOR DAVE G )
VALIDATION CHECKS:
: This test passed cycle performance (Gasoline Regulations).
: Torque I BHP standard errors are validated by the Dlgalog.
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 9- 3-92 9:56
Processing Time: 09/03/92 13:30:48
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 13923 TIM DAVIS
SEGMENT LENGTH
ACT BHP-HR REF BHP-HR
01
02
03
04
TOT
248
245
305
316
304
1.445
3.778
10.245
1.467
16.935
,427
,773
10.305
1.431
16.936
% DIFF
1.26
.13
-.58
2.52
-.01
•Remark: 2ND HOT START 20 % BLEND FOR DAVE (G)"
SPEED SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST RSQUARE NSIZE SHIFT
01
02
03
04
TOT
12.961
15.620
21.633
11.576
16.523
1.00868
1.00611
1.00325
1.00976
1.00383
-5.524
-4.524
-2.165
-6.349
-.947
.99964
.99974
.99915
.99960
.99>977
248
245
305
316
304
.8
.8
.8
.8
.8
TORQUE SEG STD.ERR SLOPE
CONST RSQUARE NSIZE SHIFT
01
02
03
04
TOT
3.345%
3.875%
4.142%
3.458%
3.791%
.94753
.94549
.93600
.95611
.95344
1.477
1.848
3.598
1.503
1.814
.98537
.96478
.98304
.98349
.98784
245
307
305
304
273
.8
.8
.8
.8
.8
HP
SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST RSQUAKE NSIZE SHIFT
10
01
02
03
04
TOT
1.774%
2.774%
3.483%
1.544%
2.650%
.96582
.97629
.94232
.97666
.97175
.474
.639
2.870
.436
.788
.98853
.98867
.98589
.99035
.99143
245
245
305
304
273
.8
.8
.8
.8
.8
HD-920182
IB HS2B
999 CHUSADi:R3bOMAH92 0
DATE: 09/03/92 TIME: 13:30:52 HD-920182
-------
HD920182
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB HS2B
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 09/03/92 TIME: 13:30:52 PAGE:
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
Cms/
Bhphc
HC
Cms/
Ku-Hr
Bag 1 NLLN HS 7.598 10.169
Grams
128.670
Cms/
Bhphr
— CO
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Grams
136.896 183.581 2318.340
Cms/
Bhphr
C02
Cms/
Kw-Hr
576.80 773.50
Grams
9768.14
Cms/
Bhphr
— NOx
Cms/
Kw-Hr
4.381 5.875
Grams
74.190
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Gals
Bag 1 NLLN HS 1.552
Measured Fuel Flow: HS
— Fuel
Lbs/
Lbs Bhphr
9.606 .567
1.750 Gals 10.833 Lbs
BAG DETAIL REPORT
Bag 1 1 NLLI
Length
Bhp-Hr
Dllut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
•
BSFC
II
J HS
1167
16
17
1173
35640
1
9
344
SEC.
935
077
0 Sec.
Cu.Ft.
552 Gal.
SITE EMISSION
A009 MEAS HC
A009 MEAS CO
A009 MEAS C02
A009 MEAS NOX
5.86 L.
61 Lb. 4357.1 Gra
567 Lb/Bhp-Hr
89 Gm/Kw-Hr
RNG
16
22
23
IS
Ljrw-i\unv.
DEFL.
1.9
.2
2.0
.0
JWHJ
CONC.
5.79
14.05
.037
.00
RNG
16
22
23
15
tAiirtU
DEFL.
75.6
24.8
28.3
82 4
3j
CONC.
226.54
1986.19
.563
41.16
(.UMK&l, 1 tU
CONCENTRATION
221.09 PPMC
1972.97 PPM
.529 1
41.16 PPM
GRAMS
128.67
2318.34
9768.14
74.19
L.Mb/
BIIP-HR
7.598
136.896
576.802
4.381
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow Difference
HS 9.606 10.833 -11.321
s
I
K>
HU-9201B2
IB HS2B
999 CKUSADLK:i'jOMAR92 0
DATE: 09/03/92 TIME: 13:30:52 HD-920182
-------
HD920193
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB CA30
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 09/23/92 TIME: 16:53:16 PAGE: 1
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920193
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HO GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D101
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER350HAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36c
CVS Type: CFV
TEST CONDITIONS:
Barometer:
Dew Point 'L.-mperature:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.):
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type:
Alpha(H/C Ratio):
Fuel Specific Gravity:
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel:
29.39 "HG
51.0 F
76.4 F
56.62 grains H20/lbs. dry air
41.00 I
.9205
One Bag Only
5 IND UNLEADED, 96 OCT
1.8655
.7432
6.1900
COMMENTS:
COLO START A 30 % BLEND ETHANOL
VALIDATION CHECKS:
: This test passed cycle performance (Gasoline Regulations).
: Torque t BHP standard errors are validated by the Dlgalog.
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT -
Test Date/Time: 9-23-92 15:49
Processing Time: 09/23/92 16:53:13
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 13923 TIM DAVIS
SEGMENT LENGTH
ACT BHP-HR REF BHP-HR
% DIFF
01
02
03
04
TOT
246
242
303
316
309
1.425
3.724
10.189
1.416
16.754
.445
,818
10.385
1.449
17.096
.38
.46
.89
-2.28
-2.00
1 ,
-2.
-1 .
"Remark: 1ST COLD START 30 % BLEND ETHANOL FULL/tM"
SPEED SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST RSQUARE NSI2E SHIFT
01 13.454 1.01515 -24.071 .99961
02 15.556 1.01239 -22.946 .99975
03 22.181 1.00911 -19.694 .99912
04 11.269 1.01544 -24.221 .99962
TOT 16.733 1.00994 -19.231 .99977
248
242
303
316
309
01
02
03
04
TOT
6.818%
4.298% .
4.082%
3.350%
4.777%
.,94495
.93109
.94245
.93661
.94962
.593
1.174
2.342
.713
.948
.93558
.98055
.98353
.98373
.91)045
242
307
303
309
273
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
TORQUE SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST RSQUARE NSI2E SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
CO
ft
s
HP
SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST RSQUARE NSIZE SHIFT
01
02
03
04
TOT
4.024%
2.999%
3.502%
1.620%
3.184%
.97367
.96387
.95078
.95376
.96761
.183
.374
1.766
.215
.414
.93725
.90643
.911581
.911886
.90759
242
242
303
309
273
HD-920193
IB CA30
999 CRUSADER3'jOMAR92 0
DATE: 09/23/92 TIME: 16:53:17 HD-920193
-------
HD920193
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB CA30
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 09/23/92 TIME: 16:53:17 PAGE:
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
Cms/
Bhphr
Bag 1 NLLN HS 5.346
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
HC
Cms/
Kw-Hr Grams
7.169 89.570
CO
Cms/ Cms/
Bhphr Kw-Hr Grams
73.683 98.811 1234.480
Cms/
Bhphr
— CO2
Cms/
Kw-Hr
637.11 854.38
Grams
10674.17
Fuel
Lbs/
Bhphr
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN HS 1.448 8.966 .535
Measured Fuel Flow: HS 1.760 Gals 10.894 Lbs
Cms/
Bhphr
— NOx
Cms/
Kw-Hr
6.155 8.254
Grains
103.130
BAG DETAIL REPORT
Bag 1 1 NLLN HS
Length
Bhp-Hr
Dllut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
N
BSFC
•
1167. SEC.
16.754
18.410
1173.0 Sec.
35740. Cu.Ft.
1.448 Gal. 5.47 L.
8.97 Lb. 4066.7 Gm
.535 Lb/Bhp-Hr
325.43 Gm/Kw-Hr
SITE EMISSION
A009 MEAS HC
A009 MEAS CO
A009 MEAS C02
A009 MEAS NOX
RNG
16
22
22
17
DEFL.
.8
.0
3.9
.0
JUNU
CONC.
2.44
.00
.033
.00
RNG
16
22
22
17
— t.AIU\U
DEFL.
51.9
14.2
64.0
23.3
pi
CONC.
155.78
1047.64
.608
57.88
t~uruu.i. i C.LI
CONCENTRATION
153.47 PPMC
1047.64 PPM
.576 %
57.88 PPM
GRAMS
89.57
1234.48
10674.17
103.13
una/
BHP-HR
5.346
73.683
637.112
6.155
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow Difference
HS 8.966 10.894 -17.701
HD-920193
IB CA30
999 CRUSADEK350MAR92 0
DATE: 09/23/92 TIME: 16:53:17 HD-920193
-------
HD920191
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB HA30
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 09/23/92 TIME: 12:58:26 PAGE: 1
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HO-920191
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HD GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D101
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER350MAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 9-23-92 9:50
Processing Time: 09/23/92 12:58:24
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 13923 TIM DAVIS
TEST CONDITIONS:
29.42 "HG
Barometer:
Dew Point-Temperature: 33.3 F
Dry Bulb Temperature: 78.5 F
Humidity (Abs.t:
Humidity (Rel.l:
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type:
Alpha(H/C Ratio):
Fuel Specific Gravity:
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel:
28.40 grains H20/lbs. dry air
19.30 %
.8203
One Bag Only
SEGMENT LENGTH
ACT BHP-HR REF BIIP-HR
% DIFF
01
02
03
04
TOT
248
242
304
316
315
1.418
3.724
10.173
1.423
16.738
445
818
10.385
1.449
17.096
-1.
-2.
-2.
-1.
81
46
04
79
-2.09
"Remark: 1ST HOT START FULL E/M"
SPEED SEG STD.ERR SLOPE
CONST HSQUARE NSUE SHIFT
5 IND UNLEADED, 96 OCT
1.8655
.7432
6.1900
COMMENTS:
HOT START A 30 % BLEND ETHANOL
VALIDATION CHECKS:
: This test passed cycle performance (Gasoline Regulations).
: Torque t BHP standard errors are validated by the Dlgalog.
TORQUE
HP
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
12.
15.
22.
11.
16.
STD.
3.
3.
4.
2.
3.
STD.
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
728
297
383
135
613
ERR
322%
854%
069%
982%
672%
ERR
784%
755%
456%
497%
594%
1
1
1
1
1
.01311
.01022
.00706
.01344
.00785
SLOPE
.94732
.93615
.94981
.95344
.95534
SLOPE
.95521
.96442
.95652
.96168
.96799
-23
-22
-19
-23
-18
.144
.096
.145
.864
.517
CONST
1
1
.473
.112
.849
.345
.736
CONST
1
.238
.353
.363
.154
.348
.99965
.99976
.99910
.99963
.99977
RSQUAHE
.98547
.98448
.98385
.98751
.98668
RSQUARE
.98615
.98BS3
.98665
.99062
.99198
248
242
304
316
315
NSIZE
242
307
304
315
273
NSIZE
242
242
304
315
273
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
HD-920191
IB HA30
999 CRUSAL)EH3bOMAR92 0
DATE: 09/23/92 TIME: 12:58:28 HD-920191
-------
HD920191
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB HA30
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
Bag 1 NLLN HS
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 09/23/92 TIME: 12:58:28 PAGE:
Cms/
Bhphr
6.006
nv, —
Cms/
Kw-Hr
8.057
Grams
100.560
Cms/
Bhphr
81.099
LU -
Cms/
Kw-Hr
108.756
Grans
1357.430
Cms/
Bhphr
615.57
IX>2
Cms/
Kw-Hr
825.49
Grams
10303.42
Cms/
Bhphr
5.998
— NOx •
Cms/
Kw-Hr
8.043
Grams
100.400
Fuel
Lbs/
Bhphr
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN HS 1.432 8.866 .530
Measured Fuel Flow: HS 1.730 Gals 10.709 Lbs
Bag I 1 NLLI
Length
Bhp-Hr
Dllut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consunp.
BSFC
BAG DETAIL REPORT
\j HS
1167.
16.738
18.541
1341.0
35810.
1.432
8.87
.530
322.39
SEC.
Sec.
Cu.Ft.
Gal. 5.41 L.
Lb. 4021.7 GDI
Lb/ Bhp-Hr
Gra/ Kw-Hr
SITE EMISSION
A009 MEAS HC
A009 MEAS CO
A009 MEAS C02
A009 MEAS NOX
RNG
16
22
22
17
-bACKGRC
DEfL.
.9
.1
4.3
.0
~ll IMft
JUNU
CONC.
2.75
7.04
.036
.00
RNG DEFL.
16 58.2
22 15.6
22 62.3
17 25.4
CONC
174.
1156.
63.
55
39
590
11
CORRECTED
CONCENTRATION
171.96 PPMC
1149.73 PPM
.555 %
63.11 PPM
GRAMS
100.56
1357.43
10303.42
100.40
CMS/
BHP-HR
6.008
81.099
615.571
5.998
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED KUEL HOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow Difference
HS 8.866 10.709 -17.20%
HD-920191
IB 11A30
999 CKUSADEK3'jOMAR92 0
DATE: 09/23/92 TIME: 12:58:28 HD-920191
-------
HD920192
999 CRUSAOER3SOMAR92 0
IB HB30
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 09/23/92 TIME: 13:06:35 PAGE:
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920192
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HD GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Oyno: D101
Dyno Operator: 56.432 JOE HURLEY
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER350MAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
TEST CONDITIONS:
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.):
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type:
Alpha(H/C Ratio):
Fuel Specific Gravity:
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel:
29.42 "HG
49.9 F
78.9 F
54.27 grains H2O/lbs. dry air
36.30 t
.9112
One Bag Only
5 IND UNLEADED, 96 OCT
1.6655
.7432
6.1900
COMMENTS:
HOT START B 30 I BLEND ETHANOL
VALIDATION CHECKS:
: This test passed cycle performance (Gasoline Regulations) .
: Torque i BHP standard errors are validated by the Dlgalog.
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 9-23-92 10:30
Processing Time: 09/23/92 13:06:32
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 13923 TIM DAVIS
SEGMENT LENGTH
ACT BHP-HR R£F BHP-HR
% DIFF
01
02
03
04
TOT
248
244
304
316
316
1.429
3.735
10.155
1.409
16.727
1.44S
3.818
10.385
1.449
17.096
-1.11
-2.17
-2.21
-2.76
-2.16
•Remark: 2ND HOT START FULL E/M"
SPEED SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST RSQUARE NSIZE SHIFT
TORQUE
HP
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
25
28
31
21
27
STD
4
4
4
4
4
STD
2
3
4
2
3
.846
.320
.337
.909
.423
.ERR
.4071
.934*
.833%
.081%
.652%
.ERR
.629%
.696%
.149%
.198%
.366%
1.01069
1.00860
1.00568
1.01136
1.00656
SLOPE
.94170
.93618
.94257
.93347
.94938
SLOPE
.94392
.96002
.94745
.94481
.96153
-21
-20
-17
-22
-17
.218
.750
.580
.586
.752
CONST
1
2
.774
.233
.259
.636
.987
CONST
1
.403
.500
.731
.235
.489
.99856
.99917
.99823
.99856
.99937
RSQUARE
.97436
.97481
.97703
.97584
.98177
RSQUARE
.97391
.97935
.98056
.97924
.98643
248
244
304
316
316
NSIZE
244
307
304
316
273
NSIZE
244
244
304
316
273
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
*
to
10
HD-920192
IB HB30
999 CRUSADEH31>OMAR92 0
DATE: 09/23/92 TIME: 13:06:36 HD-920192
-------
HD920192
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB HB30
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 09/23/92 TIME: 13:06:36 PAGE:
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
Cms/
Bhphr
HC
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Bag 1 NLLN HS 6.176 8.282
Grams
103.310
Cms/
Bhphr
— CO
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Grams
81.795 109.689 1368.180
Cms/
Bhphr
— C02
Cms/
Kw-Hr
618.73 829.73
Grams
10349.50
Cms/
Bhphr
— NOx
Cms/
Kw-Hr
6.071 8.141
Grains
101.550
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Fuel
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN HS 1.440 8.916 .533
Measured Fuel Flow: HS 1.740 Gals 10.771 Lbs
Lbs/
Bhphr
BAG DETAIL REPORT
Bag 1 1 NLLN HS
Length
Bhp-Hr
Dllut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
•
BSFC
•
1167. SEC.
16.727
18.479
1173.0 Sec.
35850. Cu.Ft.
1.440 Gal. 5.44 L.
8.92 Lb. 4044.3 Gm
.533 Lb/Bhp-Hr
324.21 Gm/Kw-Hr
SITE EMISSION
A009 MEAS HC
A009 MEAS CO
A009 MEAS CO2
A009 MEAS NOX
BACKGROUND
RNG DEFL. CONC.
16
22
22
17
1.4
.1
4.2
.1
4.27
7.04
.035
.25
EXHAUST
RNG DEFL. CONC.
16 60.2 180.51
22 15.7 1164.19
22 62.4 .591
17 23.2 57.63
CORRECTED
CONCENTRATION
176.48 PPMC
1157.53 PPM
.557 t
57.40 PPM
GRAMS
103.31
1368.18
10349.50
101.55
CMS/
BHP-HR
6.176
81.795
618.730
6.071
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow Difference
HS 8.916 10.771 -17.22%
10
HD-920192
IB HB30
999 CRUSADER3bOMAR92 0
DATE: 09/23/92 TIME: 13:06:36 HD-920192
-------
H0920186
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB H140
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TKANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 09/11/92 TIME: 07:31:09 PAGE:
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
HC
Cms/ Gms/
Bhphr Kw-Hr Grams
Bag 1 NLLN HS 6.082 8.156 102.360
Cms/
Bhphr
— CO
Gms/
Kw-Hr
64.890 87.019
Grams
1092.040
Cms/
Bhphr
— C02
Cms/
Kw-Hr
615.63 825.57
Grams
10360.37
Gms/
Bhphr
— NOx
Gms/
Kw-Hr
6.019 8.072
Grains
101.290
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Fuel
Lbs/
Bhphr
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN HS 1.393 8.620 .512
Measured Fuel Flow: HS 1.700 Gals 10.523 Lbs
BAG DETAIL REPORT
I
Bag I 1
Length
Bhp-Hr
Dllut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
H
BSFC
NLLN HS
1167. SEC.
16.829
18.973
1173.0
35580.
1
8
Sec.
Cu.Ft.
393 Gal. 5.26 L.
62 Lb. 3910.0 Gm
.512 Lb/Bhp-Hr
311.44 Gm/Kw-Hr
Uftl- lUjHUUnU
SITE
A009
A009
A009
A009
EMISSION
MEAS HC
MEAS CO
MEAS C02
MEAS NOX
RNG
16
22
22
17
DEFL.
1.4
.0
4.0
.0
CONC.
4.27
.00
.035
.00
C.AI1SIU31
RNG
16
22
22
17
DEFL.
60.1
12.3
62.7
24.3
CONC
180.
930.
60.
22
92
595
37
i,vsr\r\cA. i C.LS
CONCENTRATION
176.17 PPMC
930.92 PPM
.562 %
60.37 PPM
GRAMS
102.36
1092.04
10360.37
101 .29
VJI I^J f
BHP-IIR
6.082
64.890
615.626
6.019
u
ct
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow Difference
HS 8.620 10.523 -18.084
HD-9201b6
IB H140
999 CKUSADKIO5GMAR92 0
DATE: 09/11/92 TIME: 07:31:09 HD-920186
-------
HD920186
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB HI 40
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE THANSIENT TEST
ADMIN I STRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 09/11/92 TIME: 07:31:07 PAGE: 1
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HO-920186
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HD GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D101
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER350MAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
29.03 "HG
43.7 F
81.3 F
43.41 grains H2O/lbs. dry air
26.50 %
.8707
One Bag Only
TEST CONDITIONS:
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.):
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type: 5 IND UNLEADED, 96 OCT
Alpha(H/C Ratio): 1.8655
Fuel Specific Gravity: .7432
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel: 6.1900
COMMENTS:
HOT START II 40 t BLEND ETHANOL FUEL
VALIDATION CHECKS:
: This test passed cycle performance (Gasoline Regulations).
: Torque t BHP standard errors are validated by the Dlgalog.
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 9-10-92 15:22
Processing Time: 09/11/92 07:31:04
Test Rticjuesnor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 11165 MIKE MATTHEWS
SEGMENT LENGTH
ACT BHP-HR REF BHP-HR
% DIFF
01
02
03
04
TOT
"Remark
SPEED
TORQUE
HP
248
241
300
316
314
: 1ST H/START
SEC
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
STD
12
15
21
11
16
STD
3
3
4
3
3
STD
2
2
3
1
2
.ERR
.450
.264
.401
.269
.186
.ERR
.565*
.962%
.0711
.082%
.773%
.ERR
.049%
.880%
.525%
.576%
.712%
1
3
10
1
16
40
.440
.743
.176
.470
.829
% BLEND
SLOPE
1.
1.
1.
00426
00176
99889
00512
99953
SLOPE
.
r
.
•
94040
93399
95603
93285
95030
SLOPE
.
.
96193
96989
96328
96211
97468
1.
3.
10.
1.
16.
429
755
238
433
855
ETHANOL
CONST
-4
-4
-1
-5
-
.935
.164
.643
.989
.754
CONST
1
2
2
2
2
.784
.292
.560
.432
.167
CONST
1
.515
.744
.791
.606
.718
FUEL"
RSQUARE
.
.
99966
99976
99916
99962
99978
RSQUAHE
.
•
98323
98345
98392
98621
98795
RSQUARE
98514
98779
98644
9899)
99153
.77
-.32
-.61
2.58
-.15
NSIZE
248
241
300
316
314
NSIZE
241
307
300
314
273
NSIZE
241
241
300
314
273
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
111 11140
DATE: U'J/11/92 TIME: 07:31:09 IIO-920IB6
-------
HD920187
999 CRUSAOER3SOMAR92 0
IB H240
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
Bag 1 NLLN HS
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Bag 1 NLLN HS 1.371 8.485 .505
Measured Fuel Flow: HS 1.660 Gals 10.275 Lbs
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 09/11/92 TIME: 09:06:42 PAGE:
Cms/
Bhphr
6.575
M:
Gals
m. -
Cms/
Kw-Hr
8.817
Lbs
Grams
110.490
Lbs/
Bhphr
I.U UJ4
Gms/ Cms/ Cms/ Cms/
Bhphr Kw-Hr Grams Bhphr Kw-Hr Grams
63.401 85.022 1065.520 605.84 812.45 10181.81
Gms/
Bhphr
5.882
NUX -
Gms/
Kw-Hr
7.888
Grams
98.860
BAG DETAIL REPORT
Da i
DEFL.
64.3
12.0
61.6
23.9
CONC.
192.
906.
59.
74
78
584
37
ivmnc.i~ i c.u uno/
CONCENTRATION
189.85
906.78
.551
59.37
PPMC
PPM
%
PPM
GRAMS
110
1065
10181
98
49
52
81
86
BHP-HR
6.575
63.401
605.844
5.882
10
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow Difference
HS 8.485 10.275 -17.42*
la
999 CRUSADt:K.lbUMAI
-------
HD920187
999 CRUSADER3SOMAR92 0
IB H240
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 09/1l/y2 TIME: 09:06:40 HAGE: 1
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920187
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HO GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D101
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER350MAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
TEST CONDITIONS:
29.03 "HG
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature: 42.3 F
Dry Bulb Temperature: 78.5 F
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.t:
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type:
Alpha(H/C Ratio):
Fuel Specific Gravity:
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel:
41.11 grains H2O/lbs. dry air
27.50 t
.6626
One Bag Only
5 IND UNLEADED, 96 OCT
1.8655
.7432
6.1900
COMENTS:
HOT START 12 40 % BLEND ETHANOL FUEL
VALIDATION CHECKS:
: This test passed cycle performance (Gasoline Regulations).
: Torque ( BHP standard errors are validated by the Dlgalog.
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 9-10-92 16: 1
Processing Time: 09/11/92 07:38:44
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 11165 MIKE MATTHEWS
SEGMENT LENGTH
ACT BHP-HR REF BHP-HR
% DIFF
.84
-.21
-.78
1.88
-.29
"Remark: 2ND H/START 40 % BLEND ETHANOL FUEL"
SPEED SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST RSQUARE NSIZE SHIFT
01
02
03
04
TOT
248
241
300
316
314
1.441
3.747
10.158
1.460
16.806
1.429
3.755
10.238
1.433
16.855
TORQUE
HP
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
16.
17.
24.
12.
18.
STD.
4.
4.
4.
3.
4.
STD.
2.
3.
3.
1.
3.
186
804
290
689
762
ERR
213t
5351
626%
4171
294%
ERR
615%
393%
995%
848%
167%
1.00368
1.00128
.99838
1.00418
.99905
SLOPE
.93920
.93565
.95252
.93239
.94957
SLOPE
.95582
.96930
.95829
.95959
.97191
-4
-3
-1
-5
-
.674
.987
.347
.464
.611
CONST
1
2
2
2
2
.861
.284
.713
.266
.156
CONST
1
.587
.783
.964
.563
.756
.99943
.99967
.99892
.99951
.99970
RSQUAHE
.97668
.97851
.97917
.98309
.98442
RSQUARE
.97571
.98310
.98247
.98617
.98842
248
241
300
316
314
NSIZE
241
307
300
314
273
NSIZE
241
241
300
314
273
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
10
HU-9201UV
IB 11240
999 CHUSAOKHibUMAI»92 0
DATE: 09/11/92 TIME: 09:06:42 HD-920187
-------
HD920207
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB C1WC
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 10/14/92 TIME: 12:47:06 PAGE:
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
HC
Gms/ Cms/
Bhphr Kw-Hr Grans
Bag 1 NLLN CS 5.698 7.641 95.840
Gins/
Bhphr
CO
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Grams
78.991 105.929 1328.550
C02
Cms/ Cms/
Bhphr Kw-llr Grams
624.5V 83V.56 10504.58
Cms/
Bhphr
— - NOx
Cms/
Kw-Hr
5.895 7.905
Grams
99.140
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Fuel
Lbs/
Bhphr
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN CS 1.448 8.964 .533
Measured Fuel Flow: CS 1.780 Gals 11.018 Lbs
BAG DETAIL REPORT
Bag I 1
Lencjth
Bhp-Hr
Dllut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
NLLN CS
1167. SEC.
16.819
18.471
1178.0
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
ii
BSFC
Sec.
35740. Cu.Ft.
1.448 Gal. 5.47 L.
8.96 Lb. 4066.1 Got
.533 Lb/Bhp-Hr
324.21 Gm/Ku-Hr
SITE EMISSION
A009 MEAS
A009 MEAS
A009 MEAS
A009 MEAS
HC
CO
C02
MOX
wu,ri«.jnu
RNG UEFL.
16
22
23
17
1.0
.2
1.6
.0
uuu
CONC .
3.05
14.09
.029
.00
RNG
16
22
23
17
-C.AI1/AU
DEFL.
55.7
15.4
29.9
23.0
O |
CCtJC .
167. 10
1140.79
.595
57. 13
*.,wm\c.v^ i c.u
CONCENTRATION
164
1127
57,
.22 PPMC
.47 PPM
. 56 / %
. 1 3 Pl'M
GRAMS
95.84
1328.55
10504.58
99.14
VJI-IJ/
BIIP-HK
S.698
78.991
624.566
5.895
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED 1-Ufcll. n.CW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel How Difference
CS 8.964 11.Ola -18.64%
Ib C1WC
999 CKUSAl)t;KJbOMAR92 0
DATE: 10/14/92 TIME: 12:47:06 HD-920207
-------
HD920207
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB C1WC
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DA IT-:: 10/l4/: This test passed cycle performance (Gasoline Regulations).
: Torque I BHP standard errors are validated by the Dlgalog.
Engine Test Claiib:
-------
HD920205
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB HIWC
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
HAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 10/14/'J2 TIME: 10:41:09 PAGE:
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
Bag 1 NLLN HS
Cms/
Bhphr
5.050
no -•
Cms/
Kw-Hr
6.772
Grams
83.820
Cms/
Bhphr
77.662
Gm:,/
Kw-Hr
104.146
Grams
1288.960
Cms/
Bhphr
610.45
V-U^
Cms/
Kw-Hr
818.63
Grams
10131. 6'j
Cms/
Bhphr
5.905
Cms/
Kw-Hr
7.919
Grams
98.000
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Fuel
Lbs/
Bhphr
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN HS 1.395 8.635 .520
Measured Fuel Flow: HS 1.670 Gals 10.337 Lbs
Bag I 1 NLLN
Length
Bhp-Hr
Dllut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
•
BSFC
1167. SEC.
16.597
18.899
1173.0 Sec.
35480. Cu.Ft.
1.395 Gal. 5.27 L.
8.64 Lb. 3916.9 Gm
.520 Lb/Bhp-Hr
316.30 Gm/Kw-Hr
SITE EMISSION
x-^009 MEAS HC
/A009 MEAS CO
XA009 MEAS C02
-AGO9 MEAS NOX
RAG DETAIL REPORT
CCNC.
6.71
.00
.034
.00
RNG UEFL.
16 2.2
22 .0
23 1.9
17 .0
EXHAUST
RNG UEFL. CCNC.
'16 50.3 151.02
^22 14.9 1101.89
23 29.4 .584
17 22.0 54.65
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel flow Difference
HS 8.635 10.337 -16.46*
CONCENTRATION
144.67 PPMC
1101.89 PPM
.551 %
54.65 PPM
GRAMS
83.82
1288.96
10131.65
98.00
GMS/
UHP-IIR
5.050
77.662
610.450
5.905
H-
§
X
8?
*
9
IB H1WC
999 CRUSADEK350MAR92 0
DATE: 10/14/92 TIME: 10:41:10 HD-920205
-------
HD920205
999 CRUSADER3SOMAR92 0
IB HIWC
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE UEPORT
DATf.: 10/14/92 TIMK: 10:41:08 PAGE: 1
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HO-92020S
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HO GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Oyno: D10I
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSAOER3SOMAR92
Version: 0
CVS l.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
TEST CONDITIONS:
28.90 "HG
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature: 52.0 F
Dry Bulb Temperature: 78.5 F
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.):
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type:
Alpha(H/C Ratio):
Fuel Specific Gravity:
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel:
59.78 grains H2O/lbs. dry air
39.70 I
.9333
One Bag Only
5 IND UNLEADED, 96 OCT
1.8655
.7432
6.1900
COMMENTS:
HOT START I 1 WITH CHOKE 30 % BLEND ETHANOL FUEL
VALIDATION CHECKS:
: This test passed cycle performance (Gauollr.o Regulations) .
: Torque & BHP standard errors are valldjtcd by tr.o Dlqalog.
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 10-14-92 8:57
Processing Time: 10/14/92 10:41:05
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 11165 MIKE MATTHEWS
SEGMENT LENGTH ACT BHP-HR REF BHP-HH
01 FF
01 248
02 243
03 301
04 316
TOT 314
"Remark: 1ST H/ START
SPEED SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
TORQUE SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
HP SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
STD.ERR
27.129
28.653
31.048
21.702
27.659
STD.ERR
3.6141
4.361%
4.251%
3.690%
4.046%
STD.ERR
2.162%
3.278%
3.673%
1.923%
2.941%
1.413 1.376 2.69
3.693 3.6)7 .44
10.090 10.097 -.07
1.401 1.381 1.45
16.597 16.532 .39
30 % BLEND ETHANOL W/ CHOKE"
SLOPE
1.00967
1.00719
1.00450
1.00969
1.00535
SLOPE
.96747
.94705
.96284
.95614
.96328
SLOPE
.97953
.98125
.96948
.97614
.98283
CONST
-3.827
-2.710
.255
-4.283
-.006
CONST
1.383
2.048
2.081
1.369
1.616
CONST
.469
.624
1 .651
.363
.603
RSQUARE
.99841
.99914
.99826
.99858
.99936
RSQUARE
.98336
.98084
.98326
.98102
.98678
RSQUARE
.98275
.98398
.98513
.98440
.98984
NSUE
248
243
301
316
314
NSIZE
243
307
301
314
273
NSI2E
243
243
301
314
273
SHUT
.4
.4
.4
.4
.4
SHIFT
.4
.4
.4
.4
.4
SHiFT
.4
.4
.4
.4
.4
HD-92U2G5
IB H1WC
999 CRUSADEHJ50MAK92 0
DATE: 10/14/92 TIME: 10:41:09 HDr920205
-------
HD920206
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB H2WC
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
Bag 1 NLLN HS
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Bag 1 NLLN HS 1.379 8.538 .514
Measured Fuel Flow: HS 1.670 Gals 10.337 Lbs
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
HAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 10/14/92 TIME: 10:47:26 PAGE:
Cms/
Bhphr
4.990
1:
Gals
nk. -
Cms/
Kw-Hr
6.692
Lbs
_ ^u _ — ^^jj, Hux
Cms/ Cms/ Cms/ Gms/ Cms/ Cms/
Grams Bhphr Kw-Hr Grams Bhphr Kw-Hr Grams Bhphr Kw-Hr Grams
82.820 .. 75.582 101.35V 1254.430 605.44 811.90 10048.45 5.676 7.612 94.200
Lbs/
Bhphr
U)
O
dp
0
H
BAG DETAIL REPORT
Bag I 1 NLLI
Length
Bhp-Hr
Dllut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
u
BSFC
» II*J
1167.
16.597
19.236
1173.0
35530.
1.379
8.54
.514.
312.65
[?m, (xuiv^ui vi j C-AflMUD 1
SEC.
Sec.
Cu.Ft.
Gal. 5
Lb. 3872
Lb/Bhp-Hr
Gm/ Kw-Hr
SITE EMISSION
•^009 MEAS HC
/AOQ9 MEAS CO
/$009 MEAS C02
.'A009 MEAS NOX
21 L.
6 Gm
RNG DEFL.
16
22
23
17
.8
.0
1.7
.0
CONC.
2.44
.00
.031
.00
RNC
-f6
35
-^17
DEFL.
48.3
14.5
29.0
22.0
CONC .
145.06
1070.86
.57b
:>i.6S
CUttKt-L, 1 C.U
CONCENTRATION
142.75 PPMC
1070.86 PPM
.546 %
54.65 Pl'M
GRAMS
82.82
1254.43
10048.45
94.20
IjMb/
BIIP-IIR
4.990
75.582
605.437
5.676
?
>r
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED rUilL H.GW:
Carbon Balance Measured Kuel Flow DJffetenco
HS 8.538 10.31/ -17.41%
CO
rt
10
1U H2WC
999 CRUSADER.3:jOMAK92 0
DATE: 10/14/92 TIME: 10:47:26 IID-920206
-------
HD920206
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB H2WC
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 10/14/92 TIME: 10:47:24 PAGE:
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920206
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HD GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D101
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER350MAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
TEST CONDITIONS:
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.):
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type:
Alpha(H/C Ratio):
Fuel Specific Gravity:
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel:
28.90 "HG
47.4 F
19.2 F
50.26 grains H2O/lbs. dry air
32.70 %
.8958
One Bag Only
5 IND UNLEADED, 96 OCT
1.8655
.7432
6.1900
COMMENTS:
HOT START I 2
30 % BLEND ETHANOL WITH CHOKE
VALIDATION CHECKS:
: This test passed cycle performance (Gasoline-
: Torque & BHP standard errors are validated by ctio
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 10-14-92 8:57
Processing Time: 10/14/92 10:47:22
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 11165 MIKE MATTHEWS
SEGMENT LENGTH ACT UHP-HR REF BHP-IIR
01
02
03
04
TOT
248
243
301
316
314
1.413
3.693
10.090
1.401
16.597
.376
.677
10.097
1.381
16.532
% DIFF
2.69
.44
-.07
; .45
.39
"Remark: 1ST H/START 30 % BLEND ETHANOL W/ CHOKE"
SPEED SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST RSQUARE NS1ZE SHIFT
01
02
03
04
TOT
27.129
28.653
31.048
21.702
27.659
1.00967
1 .00719
1.00450
1.00969
1.00535
-3.827
-2.710
.255
-4.283
-.006
.99841
.99914
.99826
.99858
.99936
248
243
301
316
314
.4
.4
.4
.4
.4
TORQUE SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST RSQUARE
01
02
03
04
TOT
3.614%
4.361%
4.251%
3.690%
4.046%
.96747
.94705
.96284
.95614
.96328
1.383
2.048
2.081
1.369
1.616
.98336
.98084
.98326
.98102
.98678
243
307
301
314
273
HP
SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST RSQUARE
01
02
03
04
TOT
2.162%
3.278%
3.673%
1.923%
2.941%
.97953
.98125
.96948
.97614
.98283
.469
.624
1.651
.363
.603
.9U275
.98398
.98513
.98440
.98984
NSIZE SHIFT
. 4
.4
.4
.4
.4
SHUT
. -1
.4
.4
. 4
.4
243
243
301
314
273
10
HD-920206
IB H2WC
999 CKUSADEK3'jOMAK92 0
DATE: 10/14/92 TIME: 10:47:26 HD-920206
-------
HD92021U
999 CRUSADER3bOMAI<92 0
IB C2WC
l;,Vii.: i.i.' ::,/'!/ TIMI!: I1:4X:41 PACK: '/
DAG tMi:;;;iON HESULTS:
Gms/ Cms/
Bhphr Kw-Hr Grams
Bag 1 NL1.N CS 6.451 8.651 107.740
C;n:./ Ci:.-./
Bhpln Kw-li: i;r.;ia:;
'/b.l)L.i 101. i./. iiO'i. •',•;,
L(V
Km:./ Cm:;/
Bhphi Kw-llr tir..ir,i.
iiiiu.oj lo.Vbi.. /1
Cm:;/ Cm:;/
Hhphr Kw-lli Gum:.
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Fuel
l.bs/
Gals l.bs Bhphr
Bag 1 NU.N CS 1:424 B.UI2 . S2n
Measured Fuel Flow: CS 1.740 Gals 10. Ill U;:,
Bacj I I NLI.N C.1
Bhp-Hr
DlluL. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
H
BSFC
HA:; I.-MTAII. KKPOUT
8.81 l.b. 3996.9
.528 l.b/Rhp-llr
321.17 Cia/Kw-llr
] »
FUEl CONSUMPTION - CAKUON BALANC
Cart»n Balance
CE CCHl'AKK.1 ^ r*AWi.». , -, r,^:
Kuo, n,- O.t,or,.nc,.
IID-'JAJ/i I U
-------
IID9202IO
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB C2WC
lit'AVY I.U.Y
. I ;:.•: •|i:• 'I liV.: 11:-I/ : -1 i I'Ai.l::
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920210
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HD GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D101
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
TEST CONDITIONS:
Barometer: 29.01 "IIG
Dew Point Temperature: 47.9 F
Dry Bulb Temperature: 71.8 F
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.):
NOx Corr. Factor:
Manufactu:i.-i : 'J'J'i i-..: This test passed cycle per tuim.ince u,., ..;
: Torque & HUP si.i;.dar:l eir:j|i. <)!>• v.Jh:,.
I.Iiijirii: 'It
Ti.'St D.ai
Pioc(;ssli
Tim.;
i'LCIINuLtA.Y A:.:;i-.:iSMI-:hT
10-15-92 12: 3t,
10/15/92 14:42:40
JOE
SEGMENT LENGTH
ACT I1HP-HR REF HIIP-IIU
1 1; 11 I
01 248
02 245
03 301
04 316
TO!' 313
"Ui.n-.iiiK: iJOI.I), START 1
SPEED :>!.(. STD.EKi<
Ul
02
03
04
TOT
TORQUE Sh:G
01
02
03
04
TOT
IIP SEC
01
02
03
04
TOT
27.71 3
29. 32 11
31. 177
22.249
28.142
STD. ERR
6.135*
4.704*
4.427*
3.635*
4.784*
STD . ERR
3.5341
3.4b4*
3.788*
1.886*
3.289*
1.462 1.376 t. .21,
3.702 3.t/7 .tb
i O.I 26 10.09/ .29
1.409 1.3B1 .'.<;)
](.. 700 It. 532 i .02
; Ul 'i lil.ENi! 1 i.i'l. VI / ..ln.r.i " |
..LOPE CONST i<:.>. .II/\I
-------
HD920208
999 CRUSADER3SOMAR92 1
IB H3WC
HEAVY DUTY ilASOLlNE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: IO/IC/92 TIME: 09:Ob:07 I'AGE:
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
»
Test No.: HD-920208
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HD GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D101
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
TEST CONDITIONS:
Manufacturer: 999 EXl't'HIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER:i50MAR92
Version: 1
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
Barometer: 29.04 "HG
Dew Point-Temperature: 46.3 F
Dry Bulb Tenperature: 76.0 F
Humidity (Aba.): 51.75 grains H20/lbs. dry air
Humidity (Rel.): 37.60 %
NO* Corr. Factor: .9015
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type:
Alpha(H/C Ratio):
Fuel Specific Gravity:
Lba Fuel/Gals Fuel:
One Bag Only
5 IND UNLEADED, 96 OCT
1.8655
.7432
6.1900
COMMENTS:
HOT START I 3 / 30 % BLEND ETHANOL WITH CHOKE
VALIDATION CHECKS:
: This test passed cycle performance (Gasoline Kugulat Ions).
: Torque t BHP standard errors are validated by the Dlgalog.
Engine Test Clusi
Test Date/Time:
Processing Time:
92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
10-15-92 8:11
10/16/92 09:08:04
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 13923 TIM DAVIS
SEGMENT LENGTH
ACT BI1P-HR KEF BHP-HH
OIFF
01
02
03
04
TOT
•Remark
SPEED
TORQUE
HP
: HOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
248
243
303
316
315
-
START II
STD
37
41
37
32
37
STD
3
4
4
4
4
STD
2
3
4
2
.ERR
.121
.279
.736
.264
.443
.ERR
.983%
.797%
.942%
.044%
.541%
.ERR
.547%
.737%
.372%
.307%
1.414
3.686
10.109
1.403
16.613
3 30 %
SLOPE
1.00793
1.00662
1.00422
1.00897
1.00501
SLOPE
.95803
.93918
.95557
.94998
.95841
SLOPE
.97236
.97489
.96318
.97040
1 .
3.
10.
1.
16,
,3/6
.6/7
,097
.381
.532
BLEND ETHANOL WITH
CONST
-.442
-.522
2.433
-2.156
1.883
CONST
1 .605
2.245
2.679
1.472
1.827
CONST
.539
.739
2.124
.431
RSQUARE
. 99702
.99822
.99743
.99686
. 99882
RSQIIAHE
.97946
.9/654
.97738
.97700
.911324
RSQUARE
.97586
.9)896
.97891
.9)744
2.76
.24
.12
1.59
.49
CHOKE"
NS1ZE
248
243
303
316
315
NS1ZE
243
307
303
315
273
NS1ZE
243
24 J
303
315
SHIFT
.4
.4
.4
.4
.4
SHIFT
.4
. 4
.4
. 4
.4
SHIFT
. 4
.4
.4
.4
^•^
«
H
9
X
•
*
a
B
H-
_
ft
CO
ft
5
4fc
TOT
3.461% .97993
.720 .98589
273
.4
1U HJWC
999 CRU!iAI>l.UVjL,MAR9i! 1
DATE: 10/16/92 TIME: 09:08:08 110-920208
-------
HD920209
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 1
IB HIWC
HblAVY DUU .:A:;OLIHf. TRANSIENT TEST
KEPOKT
DA'IT.: h)/l«,/'J2 TIMK: 09:15:37 1>AGE:
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920209
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HD GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D10I
Oyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSAUEIOSOMAR92
Version: l
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
TEST CONDITIONS:
29.04 "HG
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature: 48.0 F
Dry Bulb Temperature: 76.6 F
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.(:
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type:
Alpha(H/C Ratio):
Fuel Specific Gravity:
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel:
51.17 grains H20/lbs. dry air
36.40 t
.8993
One Bag Only
5 1ND UNLEADED, 96 OCT
1.8655
.7432
6.1900
COMMENTS:
HOT START I 4 / 30 I BLEND ETHANOL WITH CHOKE
VALIDATION CHECKS:
: This test passed cycle performance (Gasoline Regulations).
: Torque i BMP standard errors arc validated by tru; Dlgalog.
Engine Test Cla:;^: :)2 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 10-15-92 B:50
Processing Time: 10/16/92 09:15:34
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 13923 TIM DAVIS
SEGMENT LENGTH ACT BHP-HR
01 248 1.415
02 244 3.699
03 303 10.098
04 316 1.403
TOT 315 16.615
"Remark: HOT START t 4/ 30
SPEED SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
TORQUE SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
STD.ERR
37.789
41.207
37.121
31.670
37.269
STD.ERR
4.193%
4.993%
4.923%
3.992%
4.620%
SLOPE
1.00784
1.00623
1.00366
1.00800
1.00460
SLOPE
.96287
.93961
.95173
.95402
.95867
REK BHP-HR % DIFF
1.376 2.83
3.677 .60
10.097 .01
1.381 1.59
16.532 .50
* BLEND ETHANOL WITH CHOKE"
CONST
-1.052
-.570
2.917
-1.473
1.849
CONST
1.475
2.333
2.869
1.375
1.815
RSQUARE
.99691
.99823
.99751
.99697
.99883
RSQUARE
.97749
.97466
.97737
.97776
.98267
NSIZE
248
244
303
316
315
NSIZE
244
307
303
315
273
SHIFT
.4
.4
.4
.4
.4
SHIFT
.4
.4
.4
.4
.4
1
^
1
I
!
j
^
1
I
c
r
HP
SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST RSQUARE NSIZE SHIFT
01
02
03
04
TOT
2.632%
3.838%
4.367%
2.290%
3.503%
.97450
.97736
.95777
.97275
.97854
.532
.758
2.335
.396
.751
.97430
.97795
.97872
.97787
.98551
244
244
303
315
273
.4
.4
.4
.4
.4
I
HU-9J0209
IB
IUWC
9
-------
HD920208
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 1
IB H3WC
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
HEAVY lUlVi U-V.OLINK TRANSIENT TEST
l!AG HUSSIONS REPORT
UATK: lU/lu/'J2 TIME: 0
-------
H0920199
999 CRUSADER3SOMAR92 0
IB ACB5
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HO-920199
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HO GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D101
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 10/08/92 TIME: 15:45:06 PAGE: 1
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER350MAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36c
CVS Type: CFV
29.03 *HG
52.3 F
77.5 F
60.18 grains H20/lbs. dry air
41.50 %
.9349
One Bag Only
TEST CONDITIONS:
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature:
Dry Bulb Tenperature:
Hunldlty (Abs.l:
Hunldlty (Rel.t:
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type: IS CLEAN AIR ACT BASELINE
Alpha(H/C Ratio): 1.6382
Fuel Specific Gravity: .8670
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel: 7.2210
COMMENTS:
ALT CYCLE BOAT ICOMIA CYCLE I 3 TEST RUN 1
VALIDATION CHECKS:
: This test passed cycle performance (Gasoline Regulations).
: Torque t BHP standard errors are validated by the Dlgalog.
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 10- 8-92 13:42
Processing Time: 10/08/92 15:45:03
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 13923 TIM DAVIS
SEGMENT LENGTH ACT BHP-HR
01
02
03
04
TOT
273
268
300
305
301
6.487
.777
6.753
.003
14.020
REF BHP-HR
6.597
.777
6.921
.000
14.295
% D1FF
-1.67
.00
-2.43
.00
-1.92
"Remark: 3RD ICOMIA CYCLE RUN I A"
SPEED SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST RSQIJARE NSIZE SHIFT
TORQUE
HP
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
66.
30.
123.
81.'
STD.
4.
.
3.
.
3.
STD.
4.
.
3.
.
3.
302
397
004
000
111
ERR
379%
8861
7951
597%
294%
ERR
696%
269%
528%
086%
276%
1.00458
1.00092
.99236
.00000
1.00277
SLOPE
.96122
.98263
.92497
.00000
.95880
SLOPE
.96444
.98092
.93489
.00000
.95859
-12.406
-10.567
26.021
688.689
-7.144
CONST
.953
.173
2.364
.295
.761
CONST
.716
.031
1.386
.051
.497
.99717
.99631
.93648
.00000
.99534
RSQIJARE
.97655
.91)379
.97375
.00000
.90494
RSQUARE
.97679
.99744
.98411
.00000
.90607
273
268
300
305
301
NSIZE
268
300
300
301
58
NSIZE
268
268
300
301
58
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
. 6
.6
.6
. 6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
U)
CD
I
CO
It
5
IB ACB5
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
DATE: 10/08/92 TIME: 15:45:07 HD-920199
-------
HD920209
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 1
IB H4WC
HEAVY DUTY f.ASOLlNE TRAiJ:'.IENT TEST
DAG KMISUIOUS W.l'OKT
DAiK: 10/16/9^ TIME: 0'J:15:3B PAGE:
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
Ill- —
Cms/ Cms/
Bhphr Kw-Hr
5.030 6.745
Grams
83.570
Cms/
Bhphr
75.041
VA; -
Gnu./
Kw-Hr
100. G32
Grams
1246.810
Cms/
Bhphr
612. 15
- - uu<:
Cms/
Kw-Hr
820.91
Grams
10170.'jJ
Gins/
Bhphr
5.780
NUX •
Gmi/
Kw-Hr
7.751
Grams
96.04U
U)
o
dp
Bag 1 NLLN HS
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Fuel
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN HS 1.392 8.616 .519
Measured Fuel Flow: HS 1.670 Gals 10.337 Lbs
Lbs/
Bhphr
i:M, UTAH. UEl'CKT
Bag I 1 NLU
Length
Bhp-Hr
Dllut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
M
BSFC
•
J HS
1167.
16.615
19.051
1173.0
35760.
1.392
B.62
.519
315.70
SEC.
Sec.
Cu.Ft.
Gal. 5.26 L.
Lb. 3908.2 Cm
Lb/Bhp-Hr
Cm/ Kw-Hr
SITE
A009
A009
A009
A009
EM IS
MEAS
MEAS
MEAS
MEAS
SIGN
HC
CO
CO^
I10X
IvtJo
16
22
23
17
UEFL.
1.5
.2
1.9
.0
COI4C .
4.57
14.09
.034
.00
RNG
16
22
23
17
t.AIU\u
DEFL.
49.1
14.5
29.3
22.2
CONC .
147.41
1070.86
.582
1)5.14
COHKECTEU J.MS/
CONCENTRATION GHAMS lilll'-IIK
143.11 PPIJ1C 83.57 5.030
1057.51 IHJM 1246.81 75.041
.54'J % 10170.93 612.154
55.14 Pl'M 96.04 5.780
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BA1ANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED tULl. r'l.OW:
Carbon Balance McasurocJ Fu..-l Klow Dlfterencu
HS 8.61b 10.3.1/ -16.651
HD-920209
11) H4WC
999 CI:iMAU92 1
DATE: 10/16/92 TIME: 09:15:3H HD-920209
-------
HD920200
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB ACB6
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920200
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Teat Procedure: HO GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D101
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
TEST CONDITIONS:
Barometer: 29.03 "HG
Dew Point Temperature: 52.5 F
Dry Bulb Temperature: 77.8 F
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.):
NQx Corr. Factor:
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 10/13/92 TIME: 15:43:44 PAGE: 1
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSAOER350MAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
60.64 grains H20/lbs. dry air
41.40 I
.9368
One Bag Only
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Digalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type: IS CLEAN AIR ACT BASELINE
Alpha(H/C Ratio): 1.8382
Fuel Specific Gravity: .8670
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel: 7.2210
COMMENTS:
ALT CYCLE BOAT ICOMIA CYCLE I 3
RUN B
VALIDATION CHECKS:
: This test passed cycle performance (Gasoline Regulations).
: Torque 4 BHP standard errors are validated by the Digalog.
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 10- 8-92 14:17
Processing Time: 10/08/92 15:55:30
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 13923 TIM DAVIS
SEGMENT LENGTH ACT BHP-HR
RF.F BHP-llR t DIFF
>
U>
-------
HD920199
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB ACB5
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 10/08/92 TIME: 15:45:07 PAGE:
Cms/
Bhphr
— HC
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Bag 1 NLLN HS 7.669 10.311
Grams
107.790
Cms/
Bhphr
— CO
Cms/
Kw-Hr
183.120 245.566
Grams
2567.350
Cms/
Bhphr
FUEL CONSUMPTION:.
Fuel
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN HS 1.171 8.453 .603
Measured Fuel Flow: HS 1.450 Gals 10.470 Lbs
Lbs/
Bhphr
— C02
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Grams
556.89 746.80 7807.58
Cms/
Bhphr
— NOx
Gins/
Kw-Hr
Grants
3.151 4.226 44.180
BAG DETAIL REPORT
DCKJ • 4 rlbLtl* «1»J
Length
Bhp-Hr
Dllut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
•
BSFC
•
1167.
14.020
16.055
965.0
29350.
1.171
6.45
.603
366.79
SEC.
Sec.
Cu.Ft.
Gal. 4.42 L.
Lb. 3834.1 Gfli
Lb/Bhp-Hr
Gm/Ku-Hr
SITE
A009
A009
A009
A009
EMISSION
MEAS HC
MEAS CO
MEAS CO2
MEAS NOX
RNG DEFL.
16 1.2
22 .1
22 4.1
15 .0
CONC.
3.66
7.04
.035
.00
1 AtWUOl
RNG DEFL.
16 76.2
22 33.7
22 58.1
15 59.8
CONC.
228.34
2659.72
.546
29.73
LUKKH- 1 LU
CONCENTRATION
224.91 PPMC
2653.12 PPM
.513 %
29.73 PPM
GRAMS
107.79
2567.35
7807.58
44.18
L.MS/
BHP-HR
7.689
183.120
556.889
3.151
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow Difference
HS 8.453 10.470 -19.27*
HD-920199
IB ACB5
999 CRUSADEK3bOMAR92 0
DATE: 10/08/92 TIME: 15:45:07 HD-920199
-------
HD920197
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB ACB3
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 10/08/92 TIME: 08:51:38 PAGE: 1
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HO-920197
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HD GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: 0101
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER3SOMAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
TEST CONDITIONS:
29.21 "HG
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature: 51.9 F
Dry Bulb Temperature: 60.0 F
Humidity (Abs.l:
Humidity (Rel.l:
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type:
Alpha(H/C Ratio):
Fuel Specific Gravity:
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel:
COMMENTS:
58.92 grains H2O/lbs. dry air
37.70 %
.9297
One Bag Only
15 CLEAN AIR ACT BASELINE
1.8382
.8670
7.2210
ALT CYCLE BOAT 1ST RUN 2ND ICOMIA CYCLE
VALIDATION CHECKS:
: The following cycle performance stats exceed limits:
• SPEED STD ERR (H ) - 162.114 RPM (LIMITS: 0.0 TO 100.0 RPM).
• HP SLOPE (H) - .92304 (LIMITS: 0.93 TO 1.03).
: This test is Invalid (Gasoline Regulations .
: Torque i BHP standard errors are validated by Uie Dlgalog.
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 10- 7-92 16: 0
Processing Time: 10/08/92 08:51:35
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 11165 MIKE MATTHEWS
SEGMENT LENGTH
ACT BHP-HR REF BHP-HR
% DIFF
01
02
03
04
TOT
273
273
300
305
305
5.121
4.130
4.077
1.304
14.631
5.254
4.229
4.197
1 . 352
15.032
-2.53
-2.34
-2.86
-3.55
-2.67
"Remark: 1ST RUN ICOMIA 4 MIN I 1"
SPEED SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST RSQUARE NSIZE SHIFT
TORQUE
HP
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
163.
147.
146.
265.
162.
STD.
5.
4.
4.
6.
5.
STD.
6.
4.
4.
5.
5.
667
183
054
930
114
ERR
922%
612%
613%
228%
151%
ERR
407%
690%
753%
787%
354%
1.00036
.99990
1.00058
.97857
.99933
SLOPE
.91893
.92285
.92658
.88523
.92001
SLOPE
.92603
.92623
.92737
.88114
.92304
8.
4.
101.
9.
262
683
900
873
200
CONST
2.
1.
1.
3.
1.
127
717
426
213
828
CONST
1.
1.
2.
1.
436
016
911
666
191
.98342
.98320
.98351
.96623
.98206
RSQUARE
.95900
.96810
.96837
.96117
.96493
RSQUARE
.95787
.96B75
.96784
.97015
.96538
273
273
300
305
305
NSIZE
273
300
300
305
58
NSIZE
273
273
300
305
58
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
HD-920197
IB ACB3
999 CRUSAOER3!iOMAR92 0
DATE: 10/08/92 TIME: 08:51::i9 HD-920197
-------
HD920200
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB ACB6
HEAVY Dim GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 10/13/92 TIME: 15:43:45 PAGE:
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
HC
Cms/ Cms/
Bhphr Kw-Hr Grains
Bag 1 NUN HS 1.906 10.602 110.760
Cms/
Bhphr
— CO
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Grams
185.835 249.209 2603.360
Gms/
Bhphr
— C02
Cms/
Kw-Hr
55V.98 148.26
Grams
7816.75
Gms/
Bhphr
NOx
Gms/
Kw-Hr
3.108 4.168
Grams
43.540
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Fuel
Lbs/
Bhphr
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN HS 1.178 8.505 .607
Measured Fuel Flow: HS 1.430 Gals 10.326 Lbs
BAG DETAIL REPORT
Bag I 1 NLLN HS
Length 1167. SEC.
Bhp-Hr 14.009
Dllut. Factor 15.955
Bag Fill Time 965.0 Sec.
Exh. Volume 29370. Cu.Ft.
Fuel Consump. 1.178 Gal. 4.45 L.
" 8.50 Lb. 3857.7 Gm
BSFC .607 Lb/Bhp-Hr
• 369.22 Gm/Kw-Hr
SITE EMISSION
A009 MEAS HC
A009 MEAS CO
A009 MEAS C02
A009 MEAS NOX
RNG DEFL.
16 1.4
22 .1
22 4.2
15
.0
CONC.
4.27
7.04
.035
.00
EXHAUST
RNG DEFL. CONC.
16 78.4 234.94
22 34.1 2695.11
22 58.2 .547
15 58.8
29.22
CORRECTED
CONCENTRATION
230.94 PPMC
2688.51 PPM
.514 t
29.22 PPM
GRAMS
110.76
2603.36
7816.75
43.54
GMS/
B11P-IIR
7.906
185.835
557.980
3.108
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel FJuw Difference
HS 8.505 10-326 -17.64*
10
1U ACB6
999 CRUSADER l'jOMAR'J2 0
DATE: 10/13/92 TIME: 15:43:46 IID-920200
-------
HD920198
999 CRUSAOER3SOMAR92 0
IB ACB4
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 10/08/92 TIME: 08:54:55 PAGE: 1
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920198
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HO GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: 0101
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER350MAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 10- 7-92 16:36
Processing Time: 10/08/92 08:54:52
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 11165 MIKE MATTHEWS
29.20 "HG
59.9 F
81.0 F
79.15 grains H20/lbs. dry air
48.70 %
1.0199
One Bag Only
TEST CONDITIONS:
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.):
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type: 15 CLEAN AIR ACT BASELINE
Alpha(H/C Ratio): 1.8382
Fuel Specific Gravity: .8670
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel: 7.2210
COMMENTS:
ALT CYCLE BOAT 2ND RUN 2ND ICOMIA CYCLE
VALIDATION CHECKS:
: The following cycle performance stats exceed llralus:
» SPEED STD ERR (H ) - 163.110 RPM (LIMITS: 0.0 TO 100.0 RPMI.
* HP SLOPE (H) - .92383 (LIMITS: 0.93 TO 1.03).
: This test Is Invalid (Gasoline Regulations).
: Torque i BHP standard errors are validated by the Dlgalog.
SEGMENT LENGTH
ACT BHP-HR REF BHP-HR
01
02
03
04
TOT
273
273
300
305
305
5.127
4.142
4.081
1.302
14.652
5.254
4.229
4.197
1.352
15.032
% OUT
-2.42
-2.06
-2.76
-3.70
-2.53
"Remark: 2ND RUN ICOMIA 4 MIN I 2"
SPEED SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST RSQUARE NSIZE SHIFT
TORQUE
HP
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
166.279
151.377
143.934
262.322
163.110
STD. ERR
5.917%
4.790*
4.591%
6.075%
5.187%
STD. ERR
6.403%
4.867%
4.704%
5.633%
5.381%
1.00020
.99964
1.00097
.97909
.99935
SLOPE
.91935
.92449
.93098
.88291
.92175
SLOPE
.92632
.92680
.92984
.88011
.92383
9.126
5.833
-.095
99.044
9.343
CONST
2.166
1.730
1.273
3.339
1.802
CONST
1.467
1.065
.873
2.674
1.206
.98289
.98223
.98399
.96714
.98184
RSQUARE
.95910
.96580
.96895
.96279
.96457
RSQUARE
.95795
.96646
.96(964
.97161
.96511
273
273
300
305
305
NSIZE
273
300
300
305
58
NSIZE
273
273
300
305
58
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
CO
ft
HD-920198
IB ACU4
999 CKUSAI)t:H3i-OMAR92 0
DATE: 10/08/92 TIME: 08:54:'j(i HD-920198
-------
HD920197
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
18 ACB3
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
HAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 10/08/92 TIME: 08:51:39 PACE:
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
Cms/
Bhphr
— HC
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Bag 1 NLLN HS 6.254 11.069
Grams
120.770
Cms/
Bhphr
--- CO
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Grams
I'M . 130 229.4by 2503.810
Cms/
Bhphr
— C02
Cms/
Kw-Hr
562.80 754.72
Grams
8234.28
NOx
Cms/ Cms/
Bhphr Kw-Hr
3.395 4.553
Grams
49.680
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Fuel
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN HS 1.206 B.708 .595
Measured Fuel Flow: HS 1.480 Gals 10.687 Lbs
Lbs/
Bhphr
BAG DETAIL REPORT
Bag I 1
Length
Bhp-Hr
Dllut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
H
BSFC
NLLN HS
1167.
14.631
15.723
964.0
29530.
1
SEC.
Sec.
Cu.Ft.
206 Gal. 4
8.71 Lb. 3949
.595 Lb/Bhp-Hr
361.92 Gm/Kw-Hr
56 L.
9 Gm
SITE EMISSION
A009 MEAS HC
A009 MEAS CO
AGO 9 MEAS C02
A009 MEAS NOX
OM^rxvjjAwi.
RNG DEFL.
16
22
22
15
1.0
.0
4.0
.0
JltlJ
CONC.
3.05
.00
.034
.00
RNG
16
22
22
15
DEFL.
84.5
32. /
60.4
67.1
31
CONC.
253.29
2571.69
.570
33.41
*-\ji\nc.u i c.u
CONCENTRATION
250
2571
33
.43 PPMC
.69 PPM
.538 %
.41 PPM
GRAMS
120.77
2503.81
8234.28
49.68
uri^/
BHP-HR
8.254
171.130
562.797
3.395
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuol Flow Difference
„., 8.'JOB iO.faB/ -18.52*
-------
HD92019S
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB ACB1
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 10/08/92 TIME: 08:43:44 PAGE: 1
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920195
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HD GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Dyno: D101
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER350MAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Dace/Time: 10- 7-92 14:22
Processing Time: 10/08/92 08:43:41
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 11165 MIKE MATTHEWS
29.23 "HG
51.6 F
80.0 F
58.22 grains H20/lbs. dry air
37.20 I
.9269
One Bag Only
TEST CONDITIONS:
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.):
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type: 15 CLEAN AIR ACT BASELINE
Alpha(H/C Ratio): 1.8382
Fuel Specific Gravity: .8670
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel: 7.2210
COMMENTS:
ALT CYCLE BOAT ICOMIA I 1
SEGMENT LENGTH ACT BIIP-HR REF BHP-HR
% DIFF
01
02
03
04
TOT
273
273
300
305
305
4.950
4.917
4.927
.986
15.781
5.095
5.095
5.095
1.019
16.305
-2.85
-3.49
-3.30
-3.24
-3.21
•Remark: 1ST ICOMIA CYCLE WITH E/M"
SPEED SEG STD.ERR SLOPE CONST RSQUARE NSUE SHUT
TORQUE
HP
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
317.
309.
306.
315.
311.
STD.
8.
8.
8.
8.
8.
STD.
8.
8.
8.
9.
8.
973
698
954
524
658
ERR
281%
4241
464%
700%
415%
ERR
683%
994%
941%
195%
902%
.98891
.99356
.99611
.98888
.99277
SLOPE
.81286
.81828
.82335
.81597
.81830
SLOPE
.82263
.83101
.83356
.83000
.82940
101
as
77
100
88
.476
.815
.103
.609
.383
CONST
4
4
4
5
4
.941
.993
.773
.316
.924
CONST
3.460
3.477
3.389
3.693
3.456
.93327
.93715
.93868
.93377
.93632
RSQUARE
.90927
.90965
.90981
.90377
.90922
RSQUARE
.90012
.89699
.89813
.89357
.89802
273
2)3
300
305
305
NSI2E
;r/3
1100
300
305
58
NSJZE
273
;;n
:ioo
:io5
58
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
6
. (,
. 6
. 6
.6
SHIFT
. 6
. 6
.6
.6
.6
CO
rt
5
Ib ACbl
999 CRUSADb:i<3bOMAR92 0
DATE: 10/08/92 TIME: 08:43:45 HD-920195
-------
HD92019B
999 CRUSADER3SOMAR92 0
IB ACB4
HEAVY DUTY CAROLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: IO/Ob/92 TIME: 08:54:56 PAGE:
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
HC
Gms/ Cms/
Bhphr . Kw-Hr Grains
Bag 1 NLLN HS B.347 11.194 122.300
Gms/
Bhphr
CO
Gms/
Kw-Hr
Grams
172. 221 2:10.960 2523.460
Gms/
Bhphr
— C02
Gms/
Kw-Hr
563.40 755.53
Grams
8254.90
Gms/
Bhphr
NOx
Gms/
Kw-Hr
3.661 4.909
Grams
53.640
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Fuel
Lbs/
Bhphr
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN HS 1.211 8.747 .597
Measured Fuel Flow: HS 1.480 Gals 10.687 Lbs
BAG DETAIL REPORT
Bag « 1
Length
Bhp-Hr
Dllut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
it
BSFC
NLLN HS
1167.
14.652
15.688
965.0
29560.
1
8
SEC.
Sec.
Cu.Ft.
211 Gal. 4
75 Lb. 3967
.597 Lb/Bhp-Hr
363.14 Gm/Kw-Hr
DMl.rMJlU^UHU C.AIIAUD 1
58 I.
6 Gm
SITE EMISSION
A009 MEAS HC
A009 MEAS CO
A009 MEAS C02
A009 MEAS NOX
RNG Dm..
16
22
22
15
.4
.0
J.9
.0
CONC.
1.22
.00
.033
.00
RNG
16
22
22
15
DEFL.
84.9
32.9
60.4
66.0
CONC .
254.50
2589.25
.570
32.85
^VJKnt-U 1 LU Ijfl^/
CONCENTRATION
253.
2589.
32.
35 PPMC
25 PPM
539 t
85 PPM
GRAMS
122.30
2523.46
8254.90
53.64
BHP-IIR
8.347
172.227
563.398
3.661
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED FUEL FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow Difference
US 8.747 10.68 / -18.15*
10
HD-920I9U
Ib ACU4
999 CRUSADERJ50MAR92 0
DATE: 10/08/92 TIME: 08:54:56 IID-920198
-------
HD920196
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB ACB2
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
DATE: 10/08/92 TIME: 08:48:46 PAGE:
ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
Test No.: HD-920196
Test Type: EXPERIMENTAL
Test Procedure: HD GAS TRANSIENT
EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL IDENTIFIERS:
Oyno: D101
Dyno Operator: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Manufacturer: 999 EXPERIMENTAL
Engine I.D.: CRUSADER350MAR92
Version: 0
CVS I.D.: 36C
CVS Type: CFV
Engine Test Class: 92 TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
Test Date/Time: 10- 7-92 15:25
Processing Time: 10/08/92 08:48:43
Test Requestor: 56432 JOE HURLEY
Analyzer Operator: 13923 TIM DAVIS
29.22
51.8
BO.3
"HG
F
F
58.68 grains H20/lbs. dry air
37.20 %
.9288
One Bag. Only
TEST CONDITIONS:
Barometer:
Dew Point Temperature:
Dry Bulb Temperature:
Humidity (Abs.):
Humidity (Rel.):
NOx Corr. Factor:
TEST OPTIONS:
Hot Start Only
Manual Zero and Span
Dlgalog Dyno Controller
FUEL PROPERTIES:
Fuel Type: 15 CLEAN AIR ACT BASELINE
Alpha(H/C Ratio): 1.8382
Fuel Specific Gravity: .8670
Lbs Fuel/Gals Fuel: 7.2210
COMMENTS:
ALT CYCLE BOAT ICOMIA I 2
VALIDATION CHECKS:
: The following cycle performance stats exceed llmlcs:
* SPEED STD ERR (H ) • 152.098 RPM {LIMITS: 0.0 TO 100.0 RPM).
• HP SLOPE (H) - .92487 (LIMITS: 0.93 TO 1.03).
: This test Is Invalid (Gasoline Regulations).
: Toique i BHP standard errors are validated by iho Olgalog.
SEGMENT LENGTH
ACT BIIP-IIR REF BHP-HR
01
02
03
04
TOT
273
273
300
305
305
5.138
4.147
4.091
1.310
14.685
254
229
197
352
15.032
* DIFF
-2.21
-1.94
-2.53
-3.11
-2.31
"Remark: 1ST RUN ICOMIA 4 M1N II"
SPEED SEG STD.ERR SLOPE
CONST RSQUARt: NSIZE SHIFT
TORQUE
HP
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
SEG
01
02
03
04
TOT
153
137
138
248
152
STD
5
4
4
6
5
STD
6
4
4
6
5
.535
.124
.556
.181
.098
.ERR
.945%
.831%
.706%
.736%
.292%
.ERR
.231%
.788%
.783%
.134%
.358%
1.00137
1.00107
1.00150
.98169
1.00048
SLOPE
.92073
.92450
.92777
.87874
.92088
SLOPE
.92942
.92808
.92878
.87802
.92487
7
2
91
7
.208
.400
.566
.400
.480
CONST
2
1
1
3
1
.098
.710
.440
.635
.850
CONST
1
1
2
1
.419
.055
.950
.938
.228
.98541.
.98542
.9851(5
.97064
.98421
RSQUARE
.95886
.96523
.96720
.95422
.96312
RSQUARE
.96034
.96760
.96754
.96636
.96547
273
273
300
305
305
NSIZE
273
300
300
305
58
NSIZE
273
273
300
305
58
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
SHIFT
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
1B ACB2
999 CHUSAUER350MAR92 0
DATE: 10/08/92 TIME: 08:48:48 HD-920196
-------
HD920195
999 CRUSADER3SOMAR92 0
IB ACB1
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: ]0/l)b/92 TIME: 08:43:46 PAGE:
Cms/
Bhphr
HC
Gms/
Kw-Hr
Bag 1 NLLN HS 9.025 12.103
Grams
142.420
Cms/
Bhphr
— CO
Gms/
Kw-Hr
188.885 253.299
Grams
2980.800
Gms/
Bhphr
--- C02
Gms/
Kw-Hr
559.15 749.83
Grams
8823.92
Cms/
Bhphr
— NOx
Gms/
Kw-Hr
3.343 4.483
Grams
52.760
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Fuel
Gals Ubs
Bag 1 NLLN HS 1.341 9.685 .614
Measured Fuel Flow: HS 1.640 Gals 11.842 Lbs
Lbs/
Bhphr
BAG DETAIL REPORT
Bag 1 1 NLLI
Length
Bhp-Hr
Dilut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Consump.
n
BSFC
•
M HS
1167. SEC.
15.781
14.148
964.0 Sec.
29450. Cu.Ft.
1.341 Gal. 5
9.68 Lb. 4392
.614 Lb/Bhp-Hr
373.48 Gm/Kw-Hr
.07 L.
.9 GDI
tu-.i-niinuiilMU t-Aimu^l CUKKtl. 1 tU
SITE EMISSION
A009 MEAS
A009 MEAS
A009 MEAS
A009 MEAS
HC
CO
C02
NOX
WIG DEFL.
14
16
22
15
9.1
3.0
4.0
.0
CONC.
6.77
2.96
.034
.00
RNG
16
22
22
15
DEFL.
100.7
38.3
64.2
71.6
CONC .
302.43
3072.68
.610
35.68
CONCENTRATION
296.13
3069.93
.57b
35.68
PPMC
PPM
%
PI'M
GRAMS
142.42
2980.80
8823.92
52.76
GMS/
BIIP-IIR
9.025
188.885
559.149
3.34 1
FUEL CONSUMPTION - CARBON BALANCE COMPARED TO MEASURED rUEI. FLOW:
Carbon Balance Measured Fuel Flow Difference
HS 9.685 11.842 -16.22*
HD-920195
IB ACB1
999 CHUSAUKK )bOMAH92 0
DATE: 10/08/92 TIME: 08:43:46 HD-920195
-------
Table B.I :
Certification Fuel ICOMZA/BSO Steady-State #1
Mode
Date
Speed, rpm
Torque, ft-lb
Power, hp
Water in, deg F
Water out, deg F
Oil, deg F
Inlet air, deg F
Exhaust restriction, Hg
Corrected HC, ppm
Corrected CO, ppm
Corrected NO,, ppm
Corrected CO2, %
Stabilization time, min
Collection time, min
1
7/23/92
4258
277
224.6
liS.O
159.5
245.0
81.7
2.4
348.21
13740
103.23
1.975
5
5
2
3406
197
127.8
129 .6
163.2
255.7
77.5
0.8
165.54
2709
134.20
1.288
5
5
3
2556
129
62.8
115.2
152.2
232.0
75.0
0.25
80.62
707
64.35
0.681
5
5
4
1704
71
23.0
86.1
143.6
191.1
75.3
0.5
53.53
820
4.71
0.257
5
5
5
700
1
0.1
76.0
139.9
171.9
75.3
0
208.23
524
0.25
0.071
5
5
6
2132
99
40.0
85.8
146.6
169.5
77.1
0.15
65.15
776
24.32
0.475
5
5
7
2982
161
91.4
103.6
151.6
216.1
78.2
0.45
105.43
890
114.46
0.979
5
5
8
3830
209
152.4
121.7
159.9
246.7
81.0
0.15
232.01
7118
83.78
1.446
5
5
Table B.2 :
Certification Fuel ICOMIA/BSO Steady-State #2
Mode
Date
Speed, rpm
Torque, ft-lb
Power, hp
Water in, deg F
Water out, deg F
Oil, deg F
Inlet air, deg F
Exhaust restriction, Hg
Corrected HC, ppm
Corrected CO, ppm
Corrected NO,, ppm
Corrected C02, %
Stabilization time, min
Collection time, min
1
7/23/92
4256
276
223.7
126.2
165.1
258.0
81.0
2.4
322.70
13103
108.47
2.002
5
5
2
3404
198
128.3
126.9
161.5
254.0
77.1
0.95
170.32
3109
123.46
1.276
5
5
3
2554
129
62.5
113.5
151.6
228.7
75.0
0.35
80.20
688
65.35
0.705
5
5
4
1704
72
23.4
99.5
145.2
206.4
75.3
0.5
59.52
961
4.22
0.303
5
5
5
700
1
0.1
78.5
140.3
178.5
75.3
0.0
222.03
544
0.00
0.073
5
5
6
2132
99
40.0
86.5
146.9
172.2
77.1
0.0
67.46
794
22.83
0.492
5
5
7
2980
161
91.4
96.0
149.9
208.4
78.2
0.5
107.60
862
110.47
0.966
5
5
8
3828
211
153.4
114 .2
155 .9
238.7
31.0
1.2
242.11
7707
-'2.32
1 .432
5
=
-------
H0920196
999 CRUSADER350MAR92 0
IB ACB2
BAG EMISSION RESULTS:
HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE TRANSIENT TEST
BAG EMISSIONS REPORT
DATE: 10/08/92 TIME: 08:48:48 PAGE:
Cms/
Bhphr
— HC
Cms/
Kw-Hr
Bag 1 NLLN HS 9.310 12.485
Grans
136.720
CO
Cms/ Cms/
Bhphr Kw-Hr Grains
200.047 268.267 2937.690
C02
Cms/ Cms/
Bhphr Kw-Hr
590.57 791.96
Grams
8672.47
Cms/
Bhphr
— NOx
Cms/
Kw-Hr
3.653 4.899
Grains
53.650
FUEL CONSUMPTION:
Fuel
Gals Lbs
Bag 1 NLLN HS 1.318 9.520 .646
Measured Fuel Flow: HS 1.640 Gals 11.842 Lbs
Lbs/
Bhphr
HAG DETAIL REPORT
Bag 1 1 NLLN HS
Lenqth
Bhp-Hr
Dllut. Factor
Bag Fill Time
Exh. Volume
Fuel Con sump.
it
BSFC
«
1167. SEC.
14.685
14.383
964.0 Sec.
29470. Cu.Ft.
1.318 Gal. 4.
9.52 Lb. 4318.
.648 Lb/Bhp-Hr
394.16 Gm/Kw-Hr
98 L
3 Gm
98 L.
3 Gm
SITE EMISSION
A009 MEAS HC
A009 MEAS CO
A009 MEAS C0:>
A009- MEAS NOX
:i.--.k-r\umA
RUG DEFL.
14
16
22
15
5.8
4.0
4.1
.0
U4U
CONC.
4.31
3.94
.035
.00
RNG
16
22
22
15
-LAIIMW
DEFL.
96.0
37.8
63.3
72.6
Dl
CONC.
288.10
3027.15
.600
:ib.!9
^UI\HL<~ 1 LU
CONCENTRATION
284
3023
36
.09 PPMC
.48 PPM
. 56U \
.19 pm
GRAMS
136.72
2937.69
8672.47
53.65
Vjl'IO /
BHP-HR
9.310
200.047
5
-------
Table B.5 :
Clean Air Act Baieline Fuel ICOMZA/BSO Steady-State #3
Mode
Date
Speed, rpm
Torque, ft-lb
Power, hp
Water in, deg F
Water out, deg F
Oil, deg F
Inlet air, deg F
Exhaust restriction, Hg
Corrected HC, ppm
Corrected CO, ppm
Corrected NO,, ppm
Corrected C02/ %
Stabilization time, min
Collection time, min
1
8/19/92
4262
273
221.5
132.3
170.9
261.3
83.7
2.2
252.65
12570
108.72
1.907
5
5
2
3404
197
127.4
128.2
163.5
251.0
80.6
0.9
150.46
3021
130.95
1.278
5
5
3
2554
130
63.0
111.5
150.6
225.7
78.2
0.4
72.21
652
71.57
0.719
5
5
4
1704
72
23.2
95.0
144.6
201.1
79.2
0.2
54.31
899
5.36
0.287
5
5
5
700
4
0.5
74.3
139.6
166.2
79.2
0.1
213.93
524
0.54
0.075
5
5
6
2130
98
39.8
89.2
147.2
180.8
80.3
0.1
65.84
769
25.25
0.486
5
5
7
2980
161
91.1
106. 0
151.9
219.1
80.6
0.4
100.83
1115
111.97
0.981
5
5
3
3834
212
154.4
124 .1
160.9
252.0
83.4
1.1
191.67
5833
101.49
1.432
5
5
Table B.6 :
McLaren Modes CAAB Fuel ICOMIA/BSO Steady-State #4
Mode
Date
Speed, rpm
Torque, ft-lb
Power, hp
Water in, deg F
Water out, deg F
Oil, deg F
Inlet air, deg F
Exhaust restriction, Hg
Corrected HC, ppm
Corrected CO, ppm
Corrected NO,, ppm
Corrected CO,, %
Stabilization time, min
Collection time, min
1
8/19/92
4394
268
224.2
89.5
151.2
250.3
85.1
2.5
255.76
12570
110.22
1.901
5
5
2
3516
207
138.2
128.2
163.5
252.3
82.0
0.95
165.48
3990
130.45
1.331
5
5
3
2638
134
67.1
111.8
151.2
225.4
79.2
0.3
78.89
644
87.27
0.788
5
5
4
1760
76
25.5
94.7
144.9
200.4
79.2
0.1
54.53
857
7.19
0.299
5
5
5
750
7
0.9
76.4
139.9
160.5
79.2
0.1
208.84
618
0.00
0.078
5
5
6
2200
103
43.1
84.4
146.9
166.5
80.0
0.15
66.12
711
36.49
0.525
5
5
7
3078
171
99.9
112.1
154.2
226.7
81.0
0.5
106.45
1450
127.45
1.023
5
5
8
3952
246
185.1
122.1
160.9
247.7
83.0
1 .6
220.66
9429
60.62
1.374
5
5
-------
Tabl* B.3 :
Cl«an Air Act Ba»«lin« Fu«l ICOMIA/BSO St«ady-Stat« #1
Mode
Date
Speed, rpm
Torque, ft— Ib
Power, hp
Water in, deg F
Water out, deg F
Oil, deg F
Inlet air, deg F
Exhaust restriction, Hg
Corrected HC, ppm
Corrected CO, ppm
Corrected NO,, ppm
Corrected CO,, %
Stabilization time, min
Collection time, min
1
8/12/92
4258
272
220.5
100.5
161.9
260.0
90.2
2.25
271.30
11639
124.46
1.954
5
5
2
3404
196
127.0
128.6
171.9
264.6
87.1
0.8
153.42
3152
128.95
1.268
5
5
3
2556
128
62.3
112.1
159.9
238.0
85.8
0.3
77.15
734
75.56
0.755
5
5
4
1704
72
23
98.4
153.9
218.7
85.8
0.1
52.27
934
5.46
0.285
5
5
5
700
4
0.5
74.3
148.6
183.2
86.5
0.1
241.56
547
0.64
0.062
5
5
6
2132
99
40.0
87.1
155.6
187.8
87.1
0.15
65.57
820
24.92
0.473
5
5
7
2980
161
91.1
104 .6
160.5
231.7
87.8
0.45
109.26
1150
119.98
1.020
5
5
8
3836
210
153 .0
116.6
165.9
252.7
89.9
1.5
197.12
5615
107.51
1.424
5
5
Tabl« B.4 :
Cl«an Air Act Baseline Fu«l ICOMIA/BSO St«ady-Stat« #2
Mode
Date
Speed, rpm
Torque, ft-lb
Power, hp
Water in, deg F
Water out, deg F
Oil, deg F
Inlet air, deg F
Exhaust restriction, Hg
Corrected HC, ppm
Corrected CO, ppm
Corrected NO,, ppm
Corrected C02, %
Stabilization time, min
Collection time, min
1
8/12/92
4260
275
222.7
130.0
176.8
286.0
91.6
2.35
253.33
11329
142.96
1.989
5
5
2
3408
197
127.5
131.9
175.8
272.2
88.5
0.95
160.59
3401
136.45
1.323
5
5
3
2558
130
63.1
119.3
162.5
248.3
85.8
0.35
79.10
709
80.29
0.755
5
5
4
1706
72
23.2
99.1
154.2
219.4
86.1
0.15
57.63
995
6.99
0.320
5
5
5
700
3
0.4
80.6
150.6
171.5
86.8
62.9
226.83
645
0.79
0.078
5
5
6
2132
98
39.6
86.8
155.9
188.5
87.5
63.2
68.51
801
30.03
0.511
5
5
7
2982
162
91.7
103.9
160.5
230.7
87.8
62.9
111.20
1186
125.46
1.035
5
5
8
3830
211
153.5
119.9
165.2
250.0
89.5
63.6
231.68
9840
65.35
1 .378
5
5
-------
Tabl« B.9 :
Low T-90 Fuel ICOMZA/BSO St«ady-Stat« f 2
Mode
Date
Speed, rpm
Torque, ft-lb
Power, hp
Hater in, deg F
Water out, deg F
Oil, deg F
Inlet air, deg F
Exhaust restriction, Hg
Corrected HC, pptn
Corrected CO, pptn
Corrected NO,, ppm
Corrected CO2, %
Stabilization time, min
Collection time, min
1
7/30/92
4262
273
221.5
128.9
163.2
269.0
83.0
2.3
279.34
10541
139.20
' 1.977
5
5
2
3410
197
128.2
134 .9
166.9
256.3
81.0
0.9
141.60
2385
150.21
1.324
5
5
3
2559
128
62.4
115.3
151.9
219.4
79.2
0.4
57.40
378
75.31
0.713
5
5
4
1707
71
23.1
95.7
144.9
190.5
78.9
0.15
53.08
799
6.45
0.321
5
5
5
702
1
0.1
82 = 7
143.3
153.2
78.5
0.05 .
162.00
507
0.54
0.081
5
5
6
2135
100
40.5
87.8
147.2
184.5
80.0
0.15
56.44
547
29.17
0.505
5
5
7
2984
162
91.9
94.3
149.6
221.1
81.0
0.45
88.36
776
117.96
0.976
5
5
8
3833
211
153.9
114.2
155.9
247.0
82.7
1.05
197.53
5861
110.47
1.534
5
5
Table B.10 :
Low T-90 Fuel ICOMZA/BSO St«ady-Stat« |3
Mode
Date
Speed, rpm
Torque, ft-lb
Power, hp
Hater in, deg F
Hater out, deg F
Oil, deg F
Inlet air, dag F
Exhaust restriction, Hg
Corrected HC, ppm
Corrected CO, ppm
Corrected NOX, ppm
Corrected C02, %
Stabilization time, min
Collection time, min
1
8/20/92
4262
273
221.6
126.5
165.5
255.0
83.4
2.3
273.06
10793
147.46
2.004
5
5
2
3410
196
127.3
126.2
161.2
256.0
81.7
1.0
144.31
2626
148.46
1.290
5
5
3
2558
129
62.8
112.8
151.6
225.7
79.6
0.5
62.24
421
82.28
0.784
5
5
4
1706
72
23.2
90.2
144.2
194.1
79.3
0.2
46.75
763
6.70
0.278
5
5
5
702
5
0.6
76.0
139.9
175.2
78.9
0.1
166.75
499
0.74
0.077
5
5
6
2134
99
40.2
87.1
146.9
174.5
80.0
0.15
55.29
537
30.28
0.494
5
5
7
2984
160
90.9
105.3
151.9
218.4
80.6
0.3
92.36
960
119.46
0.972
5
5
8
3834
210
153.3
122.1
160.2
245.0
82.3
0.9
156.75
4432
109.97
1 .291
5
5
-------
Table B.7 :
McLaxen Mode* CAAB Fuel ICOMIA/BSO Steady-State #5
Mode
Date
Speed, rpm
Torque, ft-lb
Power, hp
Water in, deg F
Water out-, deg F
Oil, deg F
Inlet air, deg F
Exhaust restriction, Hg
Corrected HC, ppm
Corrected CO, ppm
Corrected NO,, ppm
Corrected CO2, %
Stabilization time, min
Collection time, min
1
8/19/92
4406
267
224.0
128.6
167.9
262.9
83.7
2.4
243.36
12701
111.47
1.984
5
5
2
3520
207
138.4
129.3
164.2
253.7
80.0
0.9
165.97
3951
133.70
1.377
5
5
3
2640
133
66.9
112.5
151.2
224.7
78.2
0.35
75.80
615
87.02
0.785
5
5
4
1760
75
25.0
11.6
144.2
197.1
78.5
0.1
49.20
887
6.94
0.295
5
5
5
750
3
0.4
80.0
141.6
159.5
78.5
61.8
215.14
615
0.25
0.081
5
5
6
2200
105
44.0
89.9
147.6
184.5
80.0
61.8
66.16
719
34.75
0.542
5
5
7
3076
171
100.0
115.6
154 .2
232.4
80.6
60.4
122.06
2128
111.72
1.056
5
5
8
3956
247
186.1
125.8
162.9
252.0
82.3
58.3
232.24
10201
53.40
1.423
5
5
Table B.8 :
Low T-90 Fuel ICOMIA/BSO Steady-State #1
Mode
- Date
Speed, rpm
Torque, ft-lb
Power, hp
Water in, deg F
Water out, deg F
Oil, deg F
Inlet air, deg F
Exhaust restriction, Hg
Corrected HC, ppm
Corrected CO, ppm
Corrected NOX, ppm
Corrected C02, %
Stabilization time, min
Collection time, min
1
7/27/92
4668
271
241.0
133.6
172 . 5
271.5
82.3
2.4
308.64
12903
109.47
1.982
5
5
2
3406
196
127.1
132.6
167.9
260.3
79.6
0.95
170.82
3311
128.20
1.290
5
5
3
2560
128
62.4
109.7
150.2
224.7
76.4
0.4
78.09
542
72.57
0.706
5
5
4
1704
71
23.0
94.0
144.6
202.1
75.7
0.05
59.99
893
6.20
0.307
5
5
5
698
1
.1
77.1
140.6
176.5
75.3
0.0
173.32
490
0.88
0.081
5
5
6
2128
99
40.1
88.2
147.2
181.2
77.1
0.1
67.26
608
27.81
0.504
5
5
7
2982
160
90.8
101.5
150.9
214 .7
78.2
0.5
96. 16
615
124 .96
0.988
5
5
3
3834
210
152.9
119.3
158 .2
245.3
91.3
1.15
226.68
"088
97.52
1 .482
5
5
-------
Table B.13 :
30% Bthanol Blend Fuel ICOMIA/BSO Steady-State #1
Mode
Date
Speed, rpm
Torque, ft-lb
Power, hp
Water in, dsg F
Water out, deg F
Oil, deg F
Inlet air, deg F
Exhaust restriction, Hg
Corrected HC, ppm
Corrected CO, ppm
Corrected NOX, ppm
Corrected CO2, %
Stabilization time, min
Collection time, min
1
10/1/92
4258
273
221.3
136.6
176.8
268.0
86.0
2.1
146.67
3920.26
323.48
2.231
5
5
2
3406
196
127.1
128.9
163.5
249.3
34.4
1.1
48.80
238.88
209.08
1.414
5
5
3
2556
127
61.8
104.3
147.9
213.1
81.7
0.5
29.01
49.83
52.86
0.746
5
5
4
1706
71
23.1
. 84.4
142.9
189.1
80.0
0.1
24.41
51.81
9.51
0.326
5
5
5
700
3
0.4
73.2
138.6
168.9
78.9
0.1
124.47
259.44
1.82
0.083
5
5
6
2132
100
40.4
80.0
143.5
171.9
80.0
0.1
26.54
39.95
23.66
0.518
5
5
7
2982
161
91.4
101.1
150.6
215.1
81.0
0.5
33.92
71.90
112.24
1.046
5
5
8
3832
210
153.2
125.2
162.5
248.7
85.4
1.3
96.51
1203.31
229.51
1.648
5
5
Table B.14 :
30% Ethanol Blend Fuel ICOMIA/BSO Steady-State #2
Mode
' Date
Speed, rpm
Torque, ft-lb
Power, hp
Water in, deg F
Water out, deg F
Oil, deg F
Inlet air, deg F
Exhaust restriction, Hg
Corrected HC, ppm
Corrected CO, ppm
Corrected NO,, ppm
Corrected CO2, %
Stabilization time, min
Collection time, min
1
10/1/92
4258
271
219.7
134.9
175.2
267.0
83.4
2.1
184.39
6299.36
274.03
2.176
5
5
2
3406
197
127.8
129.6
165.5
254.3
82.0
1.35
64.12
312.56
193.81
1.390
5
5
3
2556
129
62.5
109.1
149.6
219.1
80.0
0.7
31.67
39.23
54.40
0.728
5
5
4
1704
72
23.4
86.3
143.6
196.1
79.6
0.5
28.73
66.39
7.68
0.301
5
5
5
700
4
0.5
75.3
139.6
168.2
79.2
0.3
128.68
284.70
2.41
0.088
5
5
6
2130
98
39.7
87.1
147.2
179.5
80.3
0.35
30.68
33.88
23.85
0.554
5
5
7
2980
160
90.8
101.5
150.9
215.1
81.3
0.6
35.32
59.35
110.22
1.027
5
5
a
3836
210
153 .0
119.7
159.5
243.3
93.0
0.95
U2.58
::4 • . 54
ise .33
1.461
:
•
-------
Table B.ll :
Gasohol Fuel ICOMIA/BSO Steady-State fl
Mode
Date
Speed, rpm
Torque, ft-lb
Power, hp
Water in, deg F
Water out, deg F
Oil, deg F
Inlet air, deg F
Exhaust restriction, Hg
Corrected HC, ppm
Corrected CO, ppm
Corrected NO,, ppm
Corrected CO2, %
Stabilization time, min
Collection time, min
1
8/25/92
4260
274
222.2
138.3
177.5 .
264.6
87.1
2.2
269.36
9449
131.45
1.895
5
5
2
3408
195
126.5
131.6
166.5
250.3
84.4
0.9
155.81
2692
131.20
1.371
5
5
3
2558
129
62.6
114.5
151.9
219.4
80.3
0.35
63.21
328
65.10
0.774
5
5
4
1708
70
22.8
93.3
144.6
193.1
79.2
0.1
54.73
617
5.31
0.320
5
5
5
702
5
0.7
78.9
139.6
155.2
79.2
0.1
207.35
470
0.59
0.083
5
5
6
2132
97
39.4
87.5
147.2
170.2
80.6
0.15
58.31
412
24.15
0.535
5
5
7
2982
160
90.8
104 .6
151.9
209.1
81.0
0.5
87.32
591
105.73
1.040
5
5
8
3832
210
153 .2
121.0
159.5
234 .7
84. 1
i.r
189.44
5727
93.50
1.501
5
5
Table B.12 :
Gaaohol Fuel ICOMIA/BSO Steady-State #2
Mode
Date
Speed, rpm
Torque, ft— Ib
Power, hp
Hater in, deg F
Water out, deg F
Oil, deg F
Inlet air, deg F
Exhaust restriction, Hg
Corrected HC, ppm
Corrected CO, ppm
Corrected NO,, ppm
Corrected C02, %
Stabilization time, min
Collection time, min
1
8/26/92
4258
276
224.1
130.9
169.5
253.0
84.1
2.2
270.84
10261
147.21
2.061
5
5
2
3406
196
127.1
127.2
162.2
244.0
81.3
0.95
149.33
2537
136.95
1.375
5
5
3
2556
128
62.1
111.5
150.6
217.4
77.8
0.5
58.57
302
66.59
0.753
5
5
4
1706
71
23.1
85.1
143.3
181.5
78.9
0.2
52.11
633
5.66
0.328
5
5
5
702
5
0.6
82.0
141.6
152.6
78.5
0.0
193.00
418
0.98
0.079
5
5
6
2132
98
39.8
87.5
146.9
171.2
80.0
0.1
57.41
347
24.35
0.528
5
5
7
2982
161
91.4
99.1
150.6
205.1
80.0
0.4
85.23
512
111.22
1 .05"
5
8
3836
211
153 .7
123.4
160.9
241.0
92.7
1.15
1 ?2 .14
C601
?'. 39
: . 526
. 5
5 5
-------
Table B.16 :
40% Kthanol Bland Fu«l ICOMIA/BSO Steady-State f3
Mode
Date
Speed, rpm
Torque, ft— Ib
Power, hp
Water in, deg F
Water out, deg F
Oil, deg F
Inlet air, deg F
Exhaust restriction, Hg
Corrected HC, ppm
Corrected CO, ppm
Corrected NO,, ppm
Corrected CO2, %
Stabilization time, min
Collection time, min
1
9/16/92
4262
274
221.9
132.9
172.2
264.0
82.7
2.25
121.14
2900.50
357.90
2.449
5
5
2
3408
195
126.5
132.6
167.9
259.6
82.0
0.95
40.85
186.03
216.11
1.513
5
5
3
2558
129
62.6
106.7
149.9
224.4
80.6
0.5
32.77
51.81
40.42
0.731
5
5
4
1706
71
23.1
89.9
143.6
199.5
80.6
0.2
24.23
59.13
12.14
0.374
5
5
5
700
3
0.4
73.9
138.6
176.2
81.3
0.05
95.52
274.56
2.01
0.077
5
5
6
2132
98
39.6
87.8
146.6
182.5
80.6
0.05
24.17
38.64
17.17
0.533
5
5
7
2980
160
90.8
102.9
150.6
217.6
82.3
0.5
27.78
71.90
18.26
0.447
5
5
8
3836
210
153.4
123.1
160.9
249.3
82.7
1.1
95.17
1172.01
229.76
1.692
5
5
-------
Tabl* B.15 :
40% Kthanol Blend Fu«l ICOMIA/BSO St«ady-Stat« #1
Mode
Date
Speed, rpm
Torque, ft-lb
Power, hp
Water in, deg F
Water out, deg F
Oil, deg F
Inlet air, deg F
Exhaust restriction, Hg
Corrected HC, ppm
Corrected CO, ppm
Corrected NO,, ppm
Corrected CO2, %
Stabilization time, min
Collection time, min
1
9/15/92
4262
272
220.7
121.7
163.2
243.0
82.0
2.2
135.59
2871.45
300.78
2.116
5
5
2
3410
196
127.3
134.3
169.5
254.3
80.3
0.95
47.68
258.85
194.56
1.389
5
5
3
2558
127
61.6
108.0
149.6
218.4
80.6
0.35
28.26
51.42
43.61
0.745
5
5
4
1706
72
23.2
95.0
144.2
195.5
80.0
0.1
36.28
92.69
11.09
0.369
5
5
5
702
3
0.4
80.3
139.6
181.5
80.6
0.05
257.22
388.21
1.13
0.061
5
5
6
2132
99
40.2
87.8
146.9
178.5
80.0
0.15
33.85
43.38
18.76
0.526
5
5
7
2980
162
91.9
100.5
150.2
209.8
82.0
0.55
30.11
74.21
96.77
1.065
5
5
8
3836
210
153.4
127.2
164 .5
249.3
82.0
1.2
103.29
1272.42
230.52
1.744
5
5
Table B.16 :
40% Ethanol Bland Fuel ICOMIA/BSO St«ady-Stat« #2
Mode
- Date
Speed, rpm
Torque, ft— Ib
Power, hp
Water in, deg F
Water out, deg F
Oil, deg F '
Inlet air, deg F
Exhaust restriction, Rg
Corrected HC, ppm
Corrected CO, ppm
Corrected NO,, ppm
Corrected CO,, %
Stabilization time, min
Collection time, min
1
9/16/92
4258
272
220.1
135.9
175.8
272.6
82.3
2.4
125.86
3172.90
332.87
2.248
5
5
2
3404
196
127.0
135.6
171.2
250.3
81.3
1.0
35.72
218.22
212.64
1.489
5
5
3
2554
128
62.0
113.2
150.9
224.4
80.6
0.5
31.32
45.26
38.48
0.666
5
5
4
1704
71
23.0
93.0
144.6
199.1
80.6
0.2
25.29
61.19
13.03
0.380
5
5
5
700
3
0.4
73.9
139.3
170.2
80.6
0.05
84.17
283.07
1.57
0.074
5
5
6
2130
97
39.1
88.2
146.9
178.2
80.3
0.1
25.99
39.29
19.65
0.551
5
5
7
2976
161
91.2
101.2
150.6
209.1
81.7
0.55
26.15
69.87
86.52
1 .036
5
5
8
3836
210
153.0
123.1
161.2
244.7
82.0
1.15
102.65
1440.79
226.71
1 .724
5
5
-------
ENGINEERING OPERATIONS DIVISION
Fuel Analysis Report
Gasohol lest Fuel
:"_cc.iar: He-well Hydrocarbons
5r:c;3£-d Users): Emission Factors
Quantity: SCCC gallons in Tank 44
:ate placed in service: 3/23/1939
:ate cf resupply: 11/90
Itsm
Method
Blend
Specifications
Official
EOD Values
RV? (p-Si)
ASTM D 4953
Report
9.1
:is:illacicn
Initial Boiling Point (°F)
10% Evap. Point (°F)
50% Evap. Point (°F)
90% Evap. Point (°F)
End Point (°F)
i Evaporated ac 160°F
Sulfur (wt%)
Lead (g/gal)
Phosphorous (g/gai)
KC Composition
Clefins (voi%)
Aromatics (voi%)
Saturates (vol%)
Ethanol (vol%)
r.esearcn octane number
Motor octane n urr.be r
Anti/cnocX Index
Sensitivity
ASTM D 1265
ASTM D 3831
ASTM D 3231
ASTM D 1319
EOD TP 107
ASTM D 2699
ASTM D 2700
ASTM D 439
RON-WON
'.-.'eight Fraction Carbon ASTM E 191
.v:et Heat of Combustion
(3TU/lb) ASTM D 240
Specific Gravity (60°F/60°F) ASTM D 1298
Fuel Economy Numerator
(grams carbon/gallon)
Fuel Economy Numerator with R Factor
(grams carbon/gallon)
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
9.5
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
95
124
207
312
403
40.6
0.0046
< 0.003
<0.0001
2.1
28.8
69.1
9.4
97.4
37.6
92.5
9.3
0.8239
17893
0.7451
2322
2359
-------
C. Fu«l Specifications
-------
Tank f7 8/20/91 CAAB
Procurement Specification for
Baseline Gasoline Fuel Properties
Clean Air Act Baseline Fuel
on line 8/20/91
Item
Elemental Composition
Carbon
Carbon
Lead
Phosphorous
Sulfur
Molecular Composition
Aromatics
Benzene
Oxygen
Olefins
Saturates
Physical Properties
Distillation
Initial Boiling Point
lO%Evap. Point
50% Evap. Point
90% Evap. Point
End Point
% Evap at 160 °F
Motor Tests
Antiknock Index
Motor octane number
Research octane number
Sensitivity
Net Heat of Combustion
Net Heat of Combustion
API Gravity (60°F/60°F)
Vapor Pressure
Method
Calculated
ASTM D 3343
ASTM D 3237
ASTM 0 3231
ASTM 031 20
ASTM 01 31 9
ASTM D 3606
ASTM 0481 5
ASTM 01 31 9
ASTM 01 31 9
ASTM D 86
ASTM 0 86
ASTM 0 86
ASTM 0 86
ASTM 0 86
ASTM 0 86
(D 2700+0 2699)/2
ASTM D 2700
ASTM 0 2699
D 2700-0 2699
ASTM 0 240
ASTM 0 3338
ASTM 01 298
Grabner (Pabs)
Units
g/gal
weight %
g/gal
g/gal
PPM
volume %
volume %
volume %
volume %
volume %
°F
°F
"h
°F
°F
volume %
BTU/to
BTU/to
API*
psi
Procurement
Specifications
Report
Report
0.005 Max
0.005 Max
339±94
32.0±1.1
1.53±0.03
0
9.2±1.2
58.8±1.5
9115.0
128±5.0
ZltteS.O
330±5.0
415±7.0
Report
87.3±0.5
Report
Report
9.0 Min.
Report
Report
57.410.2
8.7-8.9
EOD
Values
2454
0.8670
0.0000
0.0000
294
31.2
1.2
0.0
8.8
60.0
87
131
218
320
412
20.0
87.4
92.0
83.0
8.9
18583
18538
57.4
8.8
21-Jul-92
-------
Tank #2 Low T-90
Item
Elemental Composition
Lead
Phosphorous
Sulfur
Oxygen
Molecular Composition
Aromatics
Benzene
Methyl t-butyl ether
Olefins
Saturates
Physical Properties
Distillation
Initial Boiling Point
10% Evap. Point
50% Evap. Point
90% Evap. Point
End Point
% Evaporated at 160°F
Motor Tests
Antiknock Index
Motor octane number
Research octane number
Sensitivity
Net Heat of Combustion
API Gravity (60°F/60°F)
Vapor Pressure
Weight Fraction Carbon
Method
ASTM D 3237
ASTM D 3231
ASTM D 1 266
Report
ASTM 01 31 9
ASTM D 3606
ASTM D 481 5
ASTM 01 31 9
ASTMD 1319
ASTM D 86
ASTM D 86
ASTM D 86
ASTM D 86
ASTM D 86
ASTM D 86
(D 2700+D 2699)/2
ASTM D 2700
ASTM D 2699
D 2700-0 2699
ASTM D 240
ASTM 01 298
ASTM D 4953
ASTM E 191
Units
g/gaJ
g/gal
weight %
weight %
volume %
volume %
volume %
volume %
volume %
°F
°F
°F
°F
°F
°F
volume %
BTU/lb
API0
psi
weight %
Procurement
Specifications
0.005 maximun
0.005 maximun
0.01 maximun
1 .8-2.2
22-27
0.8-1.2
10.8-12.2
3.0-10.0
Remainder
75-95
120-135
200-230
268-292
41 5 maximum
Report
92.0-93.0
87.0-88.0
96.5-97.5
9.0 minimum
Report
Report
8.8-9.2
Report
Official
EOD Values
0.003
•cO.0001
0.0056
2.1
28.7
1.2
12.5
5.9
65.4
90
132
203
290
402
22.3
97.5
•37.9
92.7
9.1
18444
57.5
9.2
0.8467
-------
Ethanol Teat Program Fuel*
Volume % Ethanol 0
Sample Date: 6/20/91
Item Method Dnlts
RVP ASTM D 323 psl
RVP Heriog Digital ASTM D 4953 pal
Vapor Pressure Grabner ASTM D 5191 ptot
pabs
SwRI ASTM D 5190 psl
Distillation ASTM D 86
initial boiling point *f
5% evaporated *f
10% evaporated *T
20% evaporated *F
30% evaporated *F
40% evaporated *F
50% evaporated *F
60% evaporated *F
70% evaporated °F
80% evaporated *F
90% evaporated *F
95% evaporated *F
end point *F
evaporated at 160 *P Vol %
Sulfur ASTM D 1266 wt%
Lead ASTM D 3237 g/gal
Phosphorous ASTM D 3231 g/gal
Hydrocarbon Composition ASTM D 1319
oleflns Vol %
aromatlca Vol %
saturates Vol »
Research octane number ASTM D 2699
Motor octane number ASTM D 2700
Antiknock index ASTM D 439
Sensitivity RON-MON
Height fraction HyrogenASTM D 3343
Height fraction Oxygen Calculated
:*— ^Height fraction Carbon ASTM D 3343
((^Hydrogen Carbon/Ratio Calculated
3 Oxygen Carbon/Ratio Calculated
Met heat of combustion ASTM D 240 BTU/lb
(fillet heat of combustion ASTM D 3338 BTU/lb
API Gravity ASTM D 1269 'API
Specific 9i«vlly |60*F/60*F)
fuel economy numerator (q c«rbon/q*l)
Fuel economy numerator wilh R factor
6.63
8.77
9.46
8.68
87
131
218
320
412
20.0
0.029
0.00000
8.8
0
60.0
87.4
92.0
63.0
6.9
0.1330
0.0000
0.6670
1.8275
0.0000
18583
16536
57.4
0.7491
2454
2435
100
173.3
173.3
173.3
173.3
173.3
173.3
173.3
173.3
173.3
173.3
173.3
173.3
173.3
0.000
0.000
0.00000
0.0
0
0.0
0.1313
0.3473
0.5214
3.0005
0.5000
11929
47.7
0.7893
1555
1915
10
7/28/92
9.16
9.31
10.02
9.33
10
94
110
124
140
151
158
193
223
235
256
302
336
407
42.0
0.1328
0.0347
0.6325
1.9010
0.0313
17918
56.9
0.7511
2362
2388
12
8/3/92
9.38
9.53
10.24
9.47
12
91
106
123
139
150
157
176
221
237
259
308
349
404
43.7
0.1328
0.0417
0.6256
1.9164
0.0379
17785
57.1
0.7503
2340
2378
12
8/4/92
9.20
9.35
10.07
9.40
12
•4
110
123
139
ISO
1S7
17*
222
235
254
301
337
40*
44.0
0.1328
0.0417
0.625*
1.91(4
0.0379
17785
57.1
0.7503
2340
2378
14
8/5/92
9.20
9.35
10.07
9.33
14
95
111
125
140
151
158
168
220
236
254
300
343
402
43.7
0.1327
0.0486
0.6166
1.9321
0.0446
17(51
56.7
0.7519
2325
2371
14
8/5/92
9.22
9.37
10.08
9.38
14
69
117
125
143
152
158
166
219
237
255
302
342
405
43.5
0.1327
0.0486
0.8166
1.9321
0.0446
17651
56.8
0.7515
2324
2370
17
8/11/92
9.02
9.17
9.86
9.24
17
92
114
127
142
153
158
162
195
234
252
297
338
407
43.7
0.1327
0.0590
0.6081
1.95(2
0.0546
17452
56.1
0.7543
2303
2359
17
8/12/92
9.12
9.27
9.96
9.28
17
97
113
128
142
153
158
162
191
233
252
297
336
405
43.8
0.1327
0.0590
0.60*3
1.95(2
0.0548
17452
56
0.7547
2304
2360
20
8/13/92
9.03
9.18
9.89
9.21
20
95
114
128
143
153
159
.163
166
222
250
291
33i2
403
42. .2
0.1326
0.0(95
O.TfH
1 . »608
0.0(53
17252
55.8
0.7555
2277
2347
25
8/26/92
6.90
9.05
9.76
9.08
25
96
114
129
144
154
159
163
165
210
249
292
331
403
41.3
0.1325
0.0668
0.760*
2.0234
0.0*35
1*920
55.7
0.7559
2229
2323
30
8/28/92
8.61
8.75
9.44
8.80
30
95
112
130
146
156
161
163
166
168
237
284
332
399
38. (
0.1325
0.1042
0.7*33
2.0*79
0.1025
165*7
54.9
0.7591
2169
2302
35
9/1/92
8.63
8.77
9.40
8.66
35
9*
117
131
14*
157
1(1
1(4
166
168
169
276
327
391
35.9
0.1324
0.1215
0.14(1
2.1144
0.1223
1(254
54.4
0.7591
2140
2276
42
9/8/92
8.28
8.41
9.09
8.34
42
94
113
132
150
159
163
165
167
168
170
268
318
368
32.4
0.1323
0.13*9
0.7IM HCC*0
2.143)2 HC£
0.1431 Cttik
1(493 £>£fft
53.8
0.7591 VftVA
2090
2205
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN 48105
OFFICE OF
AIR AND RADIATION
MAY 2 6 1993
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Exemption from Administrative Review
FROM: Michael J. Samulski, Mechanical Engine
Engine and Vehicle Regulations Branch f
THRU: Joanne I. Goldhand, Chief
Engine and Vehicle Regulations
TO: Chester J. France, Director
Regulation Development and
The attached report entitled "Sensitivity of Test Cycle and
Fuel Type on a Crusader 350 Inboard Marine Engine, Test Results -
1992" contains emission results from a marinized General Motors
small-block engine. HC, CO, NOx, and fuel consumption results from
this program were obtained for several fuels: Indolene, Clean Air
Act Baseline fuel, Low T-90, Gasohol, 20% ethanol, 30% ethanol, and
40% ethanol. The engine was tested using the following procedures:
Heavy-Duty Federal Test Procedure (HD-FTP) , International Council
of Marine Industry Associations (ICOMIA) five-mode marine steady-
state test procedure, and the Bodensee Schiffahrts Ordnung (BSO)
eight-mode marine steady-state test procedure. In addition, some
results were obtained on the sensitivity of this marine engine to
transience by combining the ICOMIA modes into three transient
tests .
The data from the Crusader engine showed that as the
percentage of alcohol in the fuel increased, HC and CO emissions
decreased while NOx emissions increased. The addition of MTBE to
the fuel (Low T-90) showed the same trend. Adding transience to
the ICOMIA cycle increased HC, CO, and fuel consumption and
decreased NOx results. Only HC seemed to be affected by the amount
of transience added; this was probably due to rich fuel-air ratios
during accelerations.
Since this report presents only factual emission data and
noncontroversial conclusions, and will be placed in the non-road
docket, where it will be publicly reviewed, your concurrence is
requested to waive administrative revi^r according to the policy
outlined in the directive ofA^riJL 22//0.982.
Concurrence:
Nonconcurrence:
Attachment
------- |