EPA/AA/CTAB-87-08
                        Technical  Report
          Evaluation of Coloroll Methanol Dissociator
               For Cold Start Assist Application
                               by
                     Gregory K. Piotrowski
                         December  1987
                             NOTICE

     Technical Reports  do not  necessarily represent  final  EPA
decisions or positions.   They are  intended  to  present technical
analysis of  issues using  data which  are  currently  available.
The purpose in the release of such reports  is  to  facilitate  the
exchange of  technical  information and  to inform the  public  of
technical developments which may form the basis for  a final  EPA
decision, position or regulatory action.

              U.  S. Environmental Protection Agency
                   Office of  Air and  Radiation
                    Office of Mobile Sources
              Emission Control Technology Division
           Control Technology and Applications Branch
                       2565 Plymouth Road
                   Ann Arbor, Michigan  48105

-------
      UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

                   ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN 48105
                                                       OFFICE OF
                                                    AIR AND RADIATION
December 22, 1987
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT:   Exemption From Peer and Administrative  Review
FROM:
TO:
           Karl H. Hellman, Chief
           Control Technology and Applications Branch

           Charles L. Gray, Jr., Director  •
           Emission Control Technology Division
     The  attached  report  entitled,   "Evaluation   of   Coloroll
Methanol  Dissociator   For  Cold   Start   Assist  Application,"
(EPA-AA-CTAB-87-08)  describes  the  evaluation   of   a   methanol
dissociator  supplied  by  Coloroll,  pic.,  with  regard  to  its
ability  to   start  and  idle a  light-duty  engine.    Dissociator
product  gas  was piped  to  a warm engine  and  a start attempted.
This dissociator  was unable to  start  and  idle  the  test  engine
due to its low product flowrate.

     Since this  report  is  concerned  only with the  presentation
of data  and  its  analysis and  does not involve matters  of  policy
or   regulations,   your   concurrence   is   requested  to   waive
administrative  review  according  to the policy outlined in  your
directive of April 22, 1982.
Approved:  (__
                   /
                                             Date:
           Charles L. Gray, J/c. /Dir., ECTD

-------
                       Table of Contents

                                                         Page
                                                         Number
I.    Summary	"'	    1
II.   Introduction  	    1
III.  Dissociator Operation 	    2
     A.     Boiler Unit and Feedback Tank	    2
     B.     Superheater 	    4
     C.     Catalytic Dissociator 	    4
     D.     Ancillary Dissociator Components  	    4
IV.   Supporting Eguipment  	    5
V.    Program Design   	    5
VI.   Discussion of Test Results	    5
VII.  Conclusions 	    8
VIII.Acknowledgments  	    8
IX.   References	10

APPENDIX A - Hydrogen Content Determination 	 A-l
APPENDIX B - Test Engine Specifications    	 A-2

-------
I.    Summary

     A   low   flow  methanol   dissociator  was   procured   from
Coloroll, pic.,  U,K. ,   for  use  as  a cold  start  assist  for  a
methanol  engine.   This  dissociator  made  use  of  resistively
heated  ceramic  and  carbon   fiber   filters  in   the  boiler,
superheater,  and catalytic dissociator elements.

     The  objective of  this  experimentation was  to  start  and
idle  a  4-cylinder  engine on  the  dissociated methanol  product
from the Coloroll-supplied dissociator.

     H2  and  CO  product  gas  mixture from  the  dissociator  was
piped  to the  exhaust  gas  recirculation  ports  of  the  test
engine.    This  product  gas mixture  served  as  the  fuel  supply
during  the  start  experiments;  the main  methanol  injectors  on
the  test engine  were  disabled prior  to  the   start testing.
Prior to attempting this  start,  the engine  was operated at idle
for  30  minutes  to  ensure  a  warmed  engine,   and  thus  very
favorable starting conditions.

     The engine  was allowed to receive  product  gas  for various
periods,  of  15  seconds  to  4  minutes  in  duration,  before
cranking  was  attempted.   The  engine   received  product  gas
continuously during each  cranking  period.   On each  attempt, the
engine  failed  to  start.  The  most  probable  cause  of  this
failure to start was  the low flowrate of product gas  generated,
approximately  .013  grams  per  second.   An air/fuel  ratio  during
the  attempted   start  was  calculated;   this  calculated  value
exceeded 40, too lean to  have allowed a cold start.

II.  Introduction

     Light-duty  ML.OO neat methanol-fueled engines are difficult
to  start  and run in cold weather because of the single boiling
point  characteristic  of  this  fuel.   Gasoline-fueled  engines
start  with   less difficulty  under the  same  conditions  partly
because of the easily ignitable  light ends  of  this  fuel such as
butanes,  which   may  be  vaporized  before  the  cylinder  at
relatively low temperatures.

     Some   state-of-the-art   methanol    engines  require   the
addition   of    gasoline   to   the   fuel    to    improve   their
startability.[1]   Other  methanol engines utilize separate cold
start  systems relying  on  gasoline  or propane  for  cold  start
assist.[2,3]   Finally,  some researchers  have  suggested  that   a
combination  of  mechanical  approaches may  produce reliable cold
starts  of  a  neat methanol-fueled  engine  at  relatively  low
ambient conditions.[4]

     Methanol  may be  catalytically  decomposed  to  hydrogen and
carbon monoxide  gases.  Hydrogens' higher  flame  speed and lower
boiling point may make it an ideal fuel for cold start.

-------
                              -2-

     The  goal  of  this  project  was  to  evaluate  a  methanol
dissociator supplied by Coloroll, pic,  for  use as a  cold  start
assist  to  a methanol  engine.   Ideally,  the  dissociator  should
have  provided  enough   fuel  to  start  and  idle  a  2.0-liter,
4-cylinder methanol  engine.   The  design of  the program  and  a
discussion of the results obtained is given below.

Ill.  Dissociator Operation

     Methanol  may  be   dissociated   to  hydrogen   and  carbon
monoxide via the reaction:

     CH3OH(1)	2H2(g)  + C0(g)

     The   Coloroll-supplied   dissociator   accomplishes   this
reaction by a three-step  process.  First, methanol  is vaporized
in   a   boiler  and  moved   by   an  inert   carrier   gas   to  a
superheater.     The  methanol/carrier   gas   mixture   is   then
superheated  to  approximately 500°C  and  the superheated mixture
is  passed to  a  catalyzed  and  heated  dissociator.   The  hot
methanol  vapor  is  dissociated  in this  final stage  and passes
out  of  a  product  tube  and into an engine manifold.   A detailed
description of each part of the process is given below.

     A.    Boiler Unit and Feedback Tank

     The  methanol  feed  is  provided from  a sealed  glass pipe
section fitted  with stainless  steel  end plates.   The capacity
of this fuel  reservoir is approximately 3 liters.  A connection
to  the top  of  the tank is made  to  a  bottle of  compressed
nitrogen gas.  The inert gas serves three functions.

     1.    The  N2  acts  as   a  carrier  gas  to   assist product
flow throughout the system;

     2.    The  inert  N2  provides  an atmosphere safe against
rapid oxidation and fires in the dissociator; and

     3.    The  absence   of   air   in  the  dissociator  hinders
undesirable,  competing   chemical  reactions  such  as  complete
oxidation of the methanol feed.

     A  schematic  drawing  indicating the  locations  of  ties to
the  N2 gas  supply made  to  egualize  pressure over  the entire
system  is provided  as Figure  1.   The bottom of the  reservoir
contains  a drain and a  feed  line to the level control tank.

     A  level   control  tank  was  installed  between   the   fuel
reservoir  and  the boiler.   This tank  controls  the  level of
methanol  in  the boiler.   A  level switch  ballcock  in  the  tank
switches  off power to  all electrically  heated elements if  fuel
level  in  the  controller falls below  a  certain level.   An outlet
in the  bottom of the controller feeds the boiler.

-------
                                        Figure  1

               Schematic Drawing of Coloroll Methanol . Dissociator
            RESERVOIR
NITROGEN
                                            LEVEL
                                           CHAMBER
                                                                      CATALYTIC HEATER


                                                                         HEATER 3
                                                                            HEATER 2
                                                                        .BOILER/SUPERHEATER
                                                                           HEATER 1

-------
                              -4-

     The  boiler  used  for the  evaporative stage  is a  ceramic
element  with  a  resistance  of  approximately  40  ohms.    This
element  was  powered  by  220-volt  alternating  current,   and  is
isolated  electrically  from the  rest of  the dissociator by  a
base  plate  constructed  from  "Tufnol"  brand  insulation.   The
amount of current supplied to the boiler  element  determines the
vaporization  rate  of  the  liquid  methanol.   A  drain  is  also
fitted to the boiler to facilitate maintenance of the unit.

     B.    Superheater

     The  superheater  is an electrically  heated  carbon  element
with  a resistance of  approximately  one  ohm.   This  element  is
powered from a 12-volt  tapping  of  a  transformer.   A perforated
metal  plate  surrounds  this element,  and  this  surround  absorbs
radiation  from  the  heating  element  and  transfers  it   to  the
gases  passing  through  it.   The  outlet  temperature  of  the
superheater is measured by a thermocouple  in the  tube above the
cover plate.

     The  vessel  housing the boiler  and superheater consists of
two  glass  tube  sections  held  together  by  end  and  middle
flanges.   Gaskets  throughout  form  gas-tight  seals.  Tie  rods
from  the  base plate to the top plate  hold the  unit  firmly in
place.   A  'Perspex"  tube  surrounds  the  glass  tube  for extra
safety.

     C.    Catalytic Dissociator

     The  hot  methanol  vapor  and  N2 carrier  gas  pass  upward
through  a further  porous  element  heater  which has been coated
with  platinum.   This  catalyzed  heater acts as  a dissociator.
Gas  flows radially through the  porous  heater walls and out of
the unit  through a 1-inch  nominal bore  tube.   A thermocouple in
the gas stream measures temperature out of the dissociator.

     D.    Ancillary Dissociator Components

     Several  ancillary  components  were also  installed in order
to  make  the dissociator  safer to   operate.   First,  a  safety
device  consisting  of  a  rotameter and an electrical  control unit
was   installed   between  the   compressed  N2   source   and  the
dissociator.   This device shuts  off  electrical   power  to the
dissociator  unless  a  specified minimum  flowrate of  N2  was
exceeded,  approximately  5.0  standard  liters  per minute.   A
pressure  relief valve constructed of  stainless  steel and having
an  opening pressure  of  35 psig was  installed  in the  product
tube  out of the dissociator,  to prevent  an unsafe  buildup of
pressure   in  the  unit.   A  flame  arrestor  constructed  of
stainless steel  and  filled with stainless  steel  wool,  was also
installed after  the product  tube.   Finally,  a 7.5  kilovolt-amp
isolation transformer  of  240-volt   input/output  capacity was
purchased and installed  between the 220-volt  AC supply (line,
line,  neutral  and  ground) and the dissociator, which was wired
for  240-volt AC Mains Electricity (line, neutral  and ground).

-------
                              -5-

     Power to each of the  porous  element heaters was controlled
by a  remote  control  box,  which  may be  operated up to  20  feet
away  from the dissociator.   This  remote panel  contained  three
potentiometers which  were adjusted to limit the  current  to  each
element.

IV.  Supporting Equipment

     The  flow  of  methanol  feed to the boiler  was determined by
an indirect method, which involved a procedure for weighing the
fuel  supply   before  and  after   dissociator  operations   and
accounting for  hang-up  in the  level  controller,  reservoir  and
boiler.    H2  composition  in  the  product  gas,  however,   was
determined by  gas chromatography.   A GOW-MAC  Model  69-550  gas
chromatograph  was  used,  and  its  operation  is  detailed  in
Appendix A.

     The test engine  used for this  experimentation was a Nissan
CA18E,    single-overhead    camshaft,    1.8-liter   displacement
engine.    Details  and   engine specifications  are  provided  in
Appendix B.

V.   Program Design

     The  goal  of  this  program was to start and  idle a methanol
engine  using  the  product  gases  from  the  Coloroll-supplied
methanol  dissociator   as   a   fuel  supply.    The  program  was
conducted in two phases:

     1.     Installation, checkout and flow measurement; and

     2.     Engine testing of the dissociator.

     The  first phase  of the  program  involved  setting up  the
dissociator  and  measuring  the  methanol  feed   rate  from  the
reservoir.    Product  composition  was   also   determined,   and
reactor   efficiency  thereby   established.    The  second  phase
involved piping the product to a warmed  engine and attempting a
start.   Immediately  prior  to the attempted start the methanol
engine main injectors were disabled, in  order  to limit the fuel
to that supplied by the dissociator product.

VI.  Discussion of Test Results

      Initial   testing    involved   the   determination   of   feed
methanol  flowrate from the  reservoir   and H2   composition  of
the  product  gas.   From  these  measurements  the  dissociator
capacity  and efficiency could be determined.

     During  this  initial  testing,  the  boiler  element  was
exposed  to a current  of 2.55 amps over  a  voltage of 220 volts
for  561 watts applied.  The  superheater element  experienced a
current  of 55  amps  over  a voltage of  12 volts  (limited  by a
transformer)  for  a power output of 660  watts.   Gas temperature
out  of  the  superheater was  in the  range of  500-515°C during

-------
                              -6-

sampling.   The  dissqciator  operated at  57  amps  over  12  volts
for a  power  output of  680  watts.   Product  gas  temperature out
of the dissociator was measured at 490°C during sampling.

     Methanol feed  rate was  measured  indirectly  by  a careful
sequence of  controlled weighings  of the  fuel  introduced  into
the reservoir.   These weighings accounted for  methanol  hangup
in the reservoir,  flow  level  controller and boiler.  A flowrate
of 160-170  grams per hour of vaporized methanol  from the  boiler
was determined by this process.

     H2 content  of the product  gas was measured  at 9.5  volume
percent.    Inert  N£ carrier gas  flowed  into the  dissociator  at
a  rate  of  6  liters/minute.    The dissociated  product  yield
calculated from  these conditions was  29 percent, equating  to a
dissociation  of  roughly   .013   grams  per  second  of   feed
methanol.   Dissociated  product  yield is  defined here  as  grams
of methanol  dissociated to H2  and CO per minute  over grams of
methanol per minute into the dissociator.

     The next phase of this program involved piping the product
gas  into  a  warm engine and  attempting  a start and idle.   The
engine described in Appendix B  was utilized.   Product gas was
piped  into the  intake  manifold  runners via  ports for exhaust
gas recirculation.  The  engine  was warmed for 30  minutes  prior
to beginning the  start  test.   The engine  fuel  injectors were
disabled prior  to  the test,  allowing a  fuel  supply  exclusively
composed of  the dissociator  product.   The engine was cranked at
240 revolutions per minute.

     This testing consisted of  successively longer  fills  of the
intake  manifold  runners,  each  fill   followed  by  2-3  second
cranking periods.  The fill periods allowed  were of 15, 20, 25,
30,  35,  and  40-second  lengths.   Extended fills  of 2, 3,  and
4-minute  lengths were  also  tried,  followed  each  time by the
cranking sequence referred to above.

     During  this  phase,  the  boiler element operated  at 2.6 amps
over 220 volts  for  570 watts  applied.   The superheater operated
at 57  amps over 12 volts for a  power output of  680  watts.  The
gas mixture  exited the  superheater at  450°C.   The  dissociator
element received 55 amps at 12 volts for  a power  output of  660
watts.  Product gas temperature  out of  the dissociator measured
493°C during cranking.

     The methanol  vaporization  rate  in the boiler was measured
at 237.4  grams per hour  during this testing.  H2  product gas
concentration was  measured at 7.5 volume  percent.  A 20 percent
yield was  determined, equating to  a dissociated  product flow of
 .013 grams per  second.

     The  engine  failed  to  start   on each  attempt.   After one
fill attempt, that  of 30 seconds duration, the engine did  fire,
but  even  then  on only one  revolution.    During   successively
longer  fill  periods,  the  engine gave   no   indication  of  an
ability to start.

-------
                              -7-

     The low  flowrate  provided by the  boiler  may substantially
contribute to  this dissociator's  inability to  start and  idle
the warmed  engine.  The  dissociated  product flowrate to  start
an engine of similar size has been calculated [5,6]  as  .3  to .6
grams per  second  or .45  grams  per second.  The  .013 grams per
second achieved here may simply be too J.ow to allow  a start and
idle.    Extended fill  periods  did not  seem to  aid the  start
either.   Temperatures into  and  out of the  dissociator  appeared
adequate  to  promote  the  desired reaction.   The  choice   of  a
platinum  catalyst   appeared  appropriate,  and  no  attempts  at
scientific determination  of  the  dissociator element's  ability
to promote the desired reaction were made after this testing.

     An  air/fuel  ratio was calculated  at  start  conditions in
order to determine  if an appropriate  mixture  was  present to
permit cold starting.   A summary of this determination is  given
below.

     Air  flow  through  the  engine   air induction   system  was
measured  at  4.7  cfm  during  cranking  with  the  dissociator
feeding  product gas into  the exhaust gas  recirculation ports.
Methanol was vaporized  in the boiler  section at  a rate  of 3.96
grams per  minute,   and  6  liters  per  minute of  N2  carrier gas
flowed  into  the  engine  during  cranking.   The  dissociation
reaction occurred  with  a  yield of 20 percent, which  amounted to
a total  fuel  feed  stream  into  the engine  from  the dissociator
of:

     a.     .10 grams per minute H2;
     b.     .69 grams per minute CO; and
     c.     3.17 grams per minute vaporized methanol.

     An  equimolar  amount  of  oxygen  is  required   to  oxidize
either 1 mole of methanol  or  its  dissociated product; this  fact
aids  the calculation of  an air/fuel  ratio  where the fuel is a
mixture  of   H2,   CO,   and  vaporized  methanol.    It   may  be
instructive to  view the weight of fuel  in  terms of  "equivalent
methanol  grams."   This  term  is  defined  here  as  grams  of
specific  fuels  adjusted  by their combustion  energies relative
to  methanol  to  arrive  at  methanol  equivalent  weights.   Using
the information given in reference 6:

   Feed Rate From
Dissociator to Engine              Methanol Equivalent Feedrate

3.17 gpm methanol                  3.17  gpm methanol  equivalents
  .69 gpm CO                         .33  gpm methanol  equivalents
  .10 gpm H2                         •57  gpm methanol  equivalents

4.07  grams  per minute  methanol  equivalents is  the  fuel source
during cranking for the test engine.

-------
                              -8-

     Using the  ideal  gas law, the rate of  air  supplied through
the engine's air  induction  system at  cranking  is 160  gpm  air.
N2  carrier  gas  is  supplied  to  the  engine at  a  rate  of 7  gpm
N2-  If air/fuel ratio is then defined as:

     Weight of air + weight of carrier gas
     Weight of fuel in methanol equivalents

then air/fuel  ratio at  cranking  would be  calculated  as (160 +
7)/4.07,  or  41,  much too  lean  to  start.   If  the  concept  of
methanol equivalents  is  neglected and weight of fuel is defined
as  total  fuel  weight,  regardless  of  chemical  composition,
air/fuel  ratio  is calculated as  (160 + 7)/3.96 or 42,  much too
lean to start.

     Further experiments with this  technology  may  make  use  of
the  superheater and  catalytic  dissociator elements.   The  rate
of  vaporization  prior  to  superheating   will   have   to   be
substantially  improved  before satisfactory results using  this
technology as  a cold  start  assist for a  methanol engine can be
achieved.

VII. Conclusions

     A  low flow methanol dissociator was tested as a cold start
assist  for a methanol engine.  The engine was  operated prior to
the cold  start  testing to ensure a most  favorable case  scenario
(fully   warmed  engine).    Dissociated   product  gas   flowing
directly  from  the  dissociator  comprised  the  fuel  supply;  the
methanol  engine fuel  injectors  were disabled during  the start
testing.

     The  engine was  allowed  to  receive  dissociated  product gas
for  various  periods  of  15  seconds   to   4  minutes   in   duration
before  cranking  was  attempted.    On  each  occasion  the engine
failed  to start.   The  most  probable cause  of the  failure to
start   was  the   low   flowrate   of  product   gas   generated,
approximately  .013  grams per  second.   Air/fuel  ratio during the
attempted  start was  calculated;   this calculated value  exceeded
40, too lean to permit  a cold start.

     Future  cold start  efforts  with this  technology  may limit
the use of the resistively heated ceramic  fiber elements to the
catalytic dissociator and superheater sections.

VIII.Acknowledgments

     The  methanol dissociator used  in this experimentation was
provided  by  Coloroll,  pic.,  a United Kingdom corporation.   The
test  engine was  provided  by Nissan Research  and  Development,
Inc., Ann Arbor,  MI.

-------
                               -9-

     The  author  appreciates   the   efforts   of  James  Martin,
technician,  Standards  Development  and Support  Branch,  Emission
Control  Technology  Division,  who greatly  assisted  the  author
with this project.   Jim was  also largely  responsible for  the
setup  of the  engine  used for  this  testing.   The  efforts  of
Michael Murphy, electrical engineer,  also of  SDSB,  with several
electrical problems that developed during setup and testing are
also greatly appreciated.

     In  addition,  the   author  appreciates   the   efforts   of
Jennifer Criss  and  Marilyn Alff  of  the Control  Technology  and
Applications Branch, ECTD,  who typed this manuscript.

-------
                              -10-

IX.  References

     1.    "Development  of  Methanol Lean  Burn  System,"  Katoh,
K. Y. Imamura, and T. Inoue, SAE Paper 860247, February 1986.

     2.    "Interim  Report  On  Durability  Testing  of  Low  Cost
Catalysts  for  Methanol-Fueled   Vehicles,"  Wagner,  R.  and  L.
Landman, EPA/AA/CTAB/TA/84-4,  August 1984.

     3.    "Using   Methanol  Fuels  In  Light-Duty  Vehicles,"
Brown,  D.,  F.  Golden,  E.  Gons,  R. Potter,  SAE Paper 872071,
November 1987.

     4.    "Unassisted Cold  Starts  to  -29°C  and  Steady-State
Tests  of  a  Direct-Injection  Stratified-Charge (DISC)  Engine
Operated On Neat  Alcohols," Siewert,  R.  and E. Groff, SAE Paper
872066, November 1987.

     5.    "Engine   Cold  Start  With   Dissociated  Methanol,"
Greiner,   L.    and   E.   Likos,   Proceedings   of    the   Third
International Symposium  on  Alcohol  Fuels Technology,  May 29-31,
1979.

     6.    Dissociated Methanol  Fuel  Requirements  to Start  A
Four-Cylinder   Engine,    Memo  from   Gregory   K.   Piotrowski,
OAR/OMS/ECTD/CTAB, Ann Arbor,  MI, 1986.

     7.  •  Fundamentals  o_f  Gas  Analysis By Gas Chromatography,
Thompson, B., Varian Associates,  Inc., Palo Alto, CA, 1977.

     8.    Basic  Gas Chromatography, McNair, H.,  Bonelli,  E.,
Consolidated Printers, Berkeley,  CA, 1968.

-------
                              A-l
                           APPENDIX A

                 Hydrogen Content Determination


Background

     The  basis  for  gas   chromatographic   separation  is  the
distribution  of  a  sample  between two  phases.    One  of  these
phases  is  a   stationary  bed,  and  the  other  is  a  gas  which
percolates  through  the stationary bed.   An  inert carrier  gas
carries  the   components  to  be  separated  through  a  column
containing  the stationary phase.  The active component of  the
stationary  phase  selectively  retards  the  sample  components
according to  their  distribution coefficients,  until  they form
separate bands in the  carrier gas.  These component bands leave
the column  in  the gas  stream and  are recorded as  a function of
time by a detector.

     If  the stationary phase is  a  solid,  this  particular  gas
chromatographic   technique   is    referred    to    as   gas-solid
chromatography.  Common packings used  are  silica gel,  molecular
sieve and charcoal.  Gas-solid  chromatography was  used  in this
experimentation,   and the  details  of  the  procedure  are  given
below.   More  complete   explanations  of   gas  chromatographic
technique are provided by Thompson and McNair.[7,8]

-------
                              A-2

                      APPENDIX A  (cont'd)
Specifications:

Chromatograph model

Detector:
  Operating principle
  Temperature control
  Carrier gas
  Detector elements
  Noise
  Drift

Injection:
  Number of ports
  Control

  Operating temperature

Column Oven:
  Temperature range
  Control

Column:

Gas flow system:
Thermal conductivity
  bridge control:
Electrical:
  Power requirements
  Circuit breaker

Physical:
Compressed Gas Auxiliaries
  Zero gas
  Span gas

Output:
  Stripchart recorder
GOW-MAC Model 69-550
         •*-.
Thermal conductivity type
Ambient to 300°C
N2
Four (4) rhenium tungsten elements
10-micro volts maximum
40-micro volts/hour maximum
Two
Solid-state, variable-voltage
  phase control
Ambient to 300°c
Ambient to 300°C
Solid state time apportioning

5' x 1/4" molecular sieve

Dual-column with dual-injection
  ports and exits

Continuous current adjust 50-300
  mA.  Bridge zero adjust.
  Attenuator for bridge output, 10
  positions to 512.
105-125 volts, 50/60 H2
7 amps

Two-section construction.  Upper
  section houses column oven,
  detector and vaporizers.  Lower
  section contains power supply,
  bridge control circuit and
  temperature controllers.
N2
40 percent H2/60 percent N2
Soltech model 3318

-------
                              B-l
                           APPENDIX B
                   Test Engine Specifications
Manufacturer
Basic engine designator
Displacement
Cylinder arrangement
Valvetrain
Combustion chamber

Bore x stroke
Compression ratio
Compression pressure
Fuel control system

EGR
Valve clearance
Idle speed
Engine oil

Fuel
Engine cranking speed
Nissan Motor Co., LTD.
CA18E
1809 cc
4-cylinder, in-line
Single-overhead camshaft
Semi-spherical, 2-spark plugs
  per cylinder
83 mm x 83.6 mm
11.0
17.0 kg/square cm (350 rpm, 80°C)
Electronically controlled fuel
  injection
EGR not used
0.30 mm HOT, intake and exhaust
700 rpm
Special formulation supplied by
  Nissan for methanol engine
  operation.
M100 neat  methanol
240 rpm

-------