EPA-AA-EOD 81-4
VW GASOLINE CORRELATION REPORT
Ry
Maryanne Mntichuk
March, 1981
Correlation Group
Testing Programs Branch
Engineering Operations Division
Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
-------
Introduction
On November 25, 1980, Volkswagen brought a modified Scirroco to
the EPA Motor Vehicle Emission Laboratory (MVEL) culminating a
correlation program involving thirteen laboratories. The
correlation program consisted of two parts, vehicle emission testing
and diagnostic tests.
At each facility, a series of six hot Federal Test Procedures
(FTP) were performed, the vehicle was equipped with test equipment
making it possible to obtain vehicle coastdowns and dynamic torque
counts. At the end of testing, a span gas comparison was performed
using NBS SRM gas cylinders of regulnted emission gases CC>2, NOx,
CO, HC, plus butane, hexane and octane. The extra gas cylinders
were analyzed for the purpose of determining the Flame lonization
Detector's (FID) response to hydrocarbons of higher molecular weight.
The intent of this report is to provide information regarding
the status of correlation between EPA and the participating
laboratories during the time this program was conducted and to
explain how to interpret the data presentation. Overall, the
correlation program ran smoothly and included enough diagnostic
tests to fulfill the main objectives of a correlation program (i.e.,
examine all areas of possible deviation).
Conclusions
Examining all data presented shows that the laboratories
included in this program exhibit differences. The area immediately
surfacing concerns variable humidity control indicated by large
coefficients of variation (C.V.%). The facilities of concern are
American Motors Corporation (12.45%), Volkswagen-Set 2 (14.09%),
. Bendix (16.62%) and Ethyl (17.16%). While there is no Federal
Register requirement for humidity, there is an emission effect
caused by humidity levels and variation.
Span gas analysis point out analyzing equipment shortcomings
explicitly (Table 3). Laboratories exhibiting significant
differences are Holley Carb. (-11.47%, propane), Bendix (-5.77%,
NOx) and Ethyl (11.68%, CO). The cylinders of hexane, octane and
butane show negative percent differences In almost every case which
indicates relative FID capabilities are roughly constant when
compared to NBS.
Other than these outstanding areas, the data is typical of a
correlation project such as this.
Emission Testing
The entire emission test sequence (six hot FTPs) was performed
in one day. Each FTP had integrated dynamic torque counts
incorporated into the cycle and was followed by two sets of three
vehicle coastdowns. At the end of emission testing, a span gas
comparison was performed on the same analysis site to maintain
continuity.
-------
-2-
Torque was measured by accumulating integrated torque counts
(Nm.s) during the emission tests. Not all of the participating labs
have this data due to a malfunction with the electronic measurement
device. Table 1 shows the results of the torque portion of the
program. A lower torque value indicates that the dynamometer is not
loading to its proper capacity, i.e., underloading a vehicle. Just
the opposite is true for a higher torque value.
After the completion of each emission test, tvro sets of vehicle
coastdowns were performed, the first set's range was 55-45 mph, the
second set was run between 56-6 mph (Table 2). The 56-6 mph
coastdown set was used for the comparison because of the longer
span, which covers most FTP driving speeds. For the case of
coastdowns, a shorter time relative to theoretical indicates that
the dynamometer is overloading the vehicle. A longer time implies
that the dynamometer is underloading the vehicle.
Volkswagen requested and was supplied with equipment
specifications for the analysis site. A partial list of the
equipment utilized by the participating labaoratories can be found
in Attachment A.
Span Gas Analysis
Another helpful diagnostic tool involves analyzing NBS cylinders
of each major gas to establish instrument capabilities. Gas
cylinders were selected based on their close proximity to the
concentration of the exhaust emitted by the Scirroco during a FTP.
Table 3 lists the results of this portion of the correlation program.
The intent of performing this diagnostic was to either pinpoint
or eliminate the influence of instrument-biased emission test
results. Deviations will directly influence emission test results,
especially since the bottle concentrations are so close to the
vehicle's output.
Data Handling
The emission tests were compared statistically using the
EPA-MVEL computer program (LABCOR). The first section of the LABCOR
program (Attachment B) statistically compares manufacturer tests to
MVEL tests and computes means, standard deviations, coefficients of
variation, and percent differences. Parameters included in the
analysis are weighted emission values for each major exhaust
component, fuel economy, barometer, humidity, and NOx correction
factor. The second portion of LABCOR (Attachment C) contains a
specific breakdown of individual tests at each facility, which also
includes statistical comparison of bag analysis. The last section
(Attachment D) contains comments associated with each test number in
the correlation program. The analysis was done in chronological
order, with the exception of EPA, to show any vehicle trends that
might have occurred throughout the program.
-------
-3-
Interpretation of LABCOR Summary
There are labs that exhibit large differences when compared to
MVEL. For example, AMC, Volkswagen-Set 2, Bendix and Ethyl show
large coefficients of variation (C.V.%) in humidity levels. If
humidity control is not consistant it may result in a higher
variance throughout the set of six emission tests on exhaust
components which can be affected by humidity (CO and NOx).
Humidity is only one factor that can influence the outcome of an
emission test. Using just the LABCOR printout to draw conclusions
could be misleading if the entire picture is not seen. Other
outside variables should be considered when analyzing LABCOR data,
e.g., dynamometer, barometer, cell temperature, constant volume
sampler (CVS), calibrations, and driver. (For this correlation
program the same driver was used for all tests, which eliminates
this variable.) The primary reason for including diagnostics in a
correlation program is to gage as many influences and effects as
possible in determining why deviations might occur in emission
testing.
Dynamometer loading variations directly affect NOx, C02 and CO
components of exhaust samples. The hysterisis of loading is
somewhat indicated by the vehicle coastdowns and dynamic torque
diagnostics performed during the correlation program. Honda, for
example, had an average 56-6 mph coastdown time of 100.775 seconds
(Table 2). This time deviates from the overall average coastdown
time of 91.913 seconds by 9.64% indicating lower loading. The LABCOR
on Honda shows an expected signed (~7%) difference for the NOx
component. By knowing the influence of dynamometer loading on
vehicles, indicated somewhat by coastdowns, part of the -7% NOx is
probably dynamometer related loading. Again care must taken during
NOx analysis on LABCOR because of the dual effects of dynamometer
loading and humidity variability.
The results of the span gas analysis can be directly applied to the
LABCOR data. For example, Ethyl displayed an 11.68% error on CO
span gas analysis (Table 3). Referring back to, the LABCOR for
Ethyl, if the span gas analysis indicated a higher measurement of CO
by 11.68%, the LABCOR would reflect the same additive 11.68%
difference when analyzing the emission tests. If one wanted to
compensate for this difference on LABCOR, we could subtract the
11.68% bringing it from 19% down to a real value, of 7.32%.
-------
Participating Facilities
AMC Emission Laboratory
R. Leihendecker
AMC - Jeep Laboratory
D. Reis
ATL Laboratory
Mr. Gallogly
Bendix Corporation Laboratory
K. Mattice
Chrysler Proving Grounds Laboratory
E. Marville
Ethyl Corporation Laboratory
J. Westveer
Fiat Laboratory
C. Cuchi
Ford Correlation Engineering Laboratory
J. Westveer
Holley Carburetor Laboratory
D. Hendriksen
Honda Motor Co. Laboratory
Mr. Tanenoto
U.S. EPA - MVEL
M. Matichuk
Volkswagen, Toledo Laboratory
H. Orlet
VWOA, Westmoreland Laboratory
' E. Henderson
-------
TABLE 1
Lab
VW-Set I
Holley Carb.
Ford
AMC
Chrysler
VW-Set II
Fiat
Bendix
Ethyl
AMC-Jeep
Honda
ATL
VW-Set III
VWOA
EPA
DYNAMIC TORQUE COUNTS
(Nm.s x 1000)
Average
180.0
179.0
181.5
183.67
185.5
182.83
182.17
169.0
183.4
186.6
181.0
185.5
equipment failure
equipment failure
equipment failure
Standard
Deviation
2.449
4.980
2.429
2.066
1.871
1.835
2.639
1.095
1.140
1.140
1.414
1.049
x & stdL, deviation (all)
181.68
4.604
-------
TABLE 2
VEHICLE COASTDOWNS
55-45 MPH COASTDOWNS (SEC)
VW-Set I
Holley Carb.
Ford
AMC
Chrysler
VW-Set II
Fiat
Bendix
Ethyl
AMC-Jeep
Honda
ATL
VW-Set III
VWOA
EPA
Average
11.550
11.925
11.925
11.717
11.833
11.800
11.175
12.267
11.208
11.560
11.950
11.458
11.858
11.600
11.440
Std. Dev.
0.0674
0.1357
0.1138
0.0835
0.0985
0.1706
0.3194
0.3892
0.3040
0.0516
0.0674
0.1084
0.0996
0.2280
0.0996
56-6 MPH COASTDOWNS (SEC)
Average
83.583
96.208
95.550
95.858
96.483
86.867
92.900
75.775
90.017
94.600
100.775
93.483
88.142
89.733
98.717
Std. Dev.
0.3810
0.9298
0.8888
0.7798
0.3486
0.8105
1.3843
1.1663
1.6458
0.7180
2.3375
0.5024
0.8207
0.9438
0.6058
5c & std. dev. (all) 11.684
0.2965
91.913
6.4446
-------
ATTACHMENT A
EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
Laboratory,
Date Nov. 80
Dyno
CVS
Make/
model
Range
FID ppla
Span gas
ppm
Make/
model
CO Range
NDIR ppm
Span gas
ppm
Make/
model
C02 Range
NDIR 7.
Span gas
Make/
model
NOx Range
CLD ppm
Span gas
ppra
Span gas
made by
Computer
system
Humidity
dctuctp1-
VW Toledo
Clayton C50
Scott CVS
Beckman 400
60/200/600
48
H&B Uras 2
1000/3000
887
H&B Uras 2
4*
3.59
Teco 44
50/1CJ/200/500
92.4
Scott
PCS
Sargent-Welch
Holley Carburet.
Cell S2
Clayton CTE 50
Richmond CFV
Beckman 400
20/50/100
99
Beckman 865
-
2000
1875
Beckman 315 B
/5.0Z
4.0
Beckman 951
250
195
Air monotoring
gos Co.
AMI
Thunder Sci.
. Ford Dearborn,
Cell 02
Clayton CTE 50
Philco CFV
Beckman 400
20/50/100
20/45/85
Bendix
100/250/500/1500
85/217/425/1230
Beckman 315 B
2.5/4* .
2.1/3.45
TECO
25/100
20/85
Union Carbide
Air Monitoring
Zerox
General Eastern
/•MC Detroit
Cell $2
Clayton CTE 50
1'oriba 20 A
Feckman 400
30/25/100/250
•
Teckman 315 B
3250/1300/4000
fecknan 315 B
2.5Z/9Z
•
Teco 10 A
100/250/1000
'
AGA - Burdox
IBM 370
Weather Measure
Chrysler
Chelsea C. 04
Clayton CTE 50
Heath 6 Bag
Beckman 400
25/100/250
20.1
Beckman 865
100/500/2000
454
Beckman 864
1.0/2.4/4.0
.92
Beckman 951
25/100/250
21.6
Chrysler
PCS
Sargent-Welch
-------
ATTACHMENT A - Cont.
EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
FID
CO
NDIR
NDIR
NOx
CLD
Laboratory,
Date Nov. 80
Dyno
CVS
Make/
model
Range
ppm
Span gas
ppm
Make/
model •
Range
ppm
Span gas
Make
model
Range
ppm
Span gas
Make/
model
Range
ppm
Span gas
Span gas
made by
Computer
system
Humidity
dccectcr
Fiat
Clayton ECE 50
Horiba 20 B
Horiba FIA 21
100/300/1000
79
Horiba AIA 21
100/500
97
Horiba AIA 21
3/7
2.02 • .
Teco 10 series
25/'.00/250
19.2/96.8
Scott & Air Monit.
Horiba, HP
Taylor
Bendix
South Cell
Schenck
Horiba 20 A
Beckman 108
100/300/1000
86.8/273
Bendix Unior
Beckman 315 B
50/250/500/1000
1500/5000/10000
47/220/958
Beckman 315 B
5
4.87
Teco 10 A
100/250/1000
87.6/219.5
Scott
Mod Comp
Sliug Psychrom.
Ethyl Corp.
South Cell
Clayton CPE 50
AMI 724 CFV
Beckman 108
200/500/1000
146.2
Beckman 315 A
1600/3200/6000
1525
Beckman 315 A
4%
2.08
AMI mod. 32
25/100/250/1000
24.48
AMI
AMI
George, RH 125
Jeep Corp.
Cell S3
Clayton CTE 50
Horiba 20 B
Beckman 400
10/100/1000
78.9
Horiba AIA 21 AS
100/500/3000
69.1/374.4/2663
AIA 23 Horiba
3Z, 5%
4.14
Beckman 951 .
10 - 10000
85.5
AGA
Digital
EC&G Inst.
Honda
Chelsea C. 04
Clayton ECE 50
AMI 728
Becknan 400
25/100/250
90.12
Bendix 8501-c
Becknan 864
250/500/1000/2000
451.7
Beckman 864
2Z, 6%
1.8
Teco 10 AR
100/250
89.5
Scott • '
AMI .
Aspirator Aesy
-------
ATTACHHEKT A - Cont.
EQUIPKENT SPECIFICATIONS
FID
CO
NDIR
Laboratory, '
tlatc Nov. 60
Dyno
CVS
Hake/
ED del
Mange
ppra
Span gas
ppm
Make/
model
Range
ppa
Span gas
"ppm
Make
model
Cl>2 Range
NDIR ppm
NOx
CLD
Span gas
X
Make/
model
Range
ppm
Span gas
pi>:n
Span gas
made by
Computer
system
Humid i ty
detector
Ffat
Clayton ECE 50
Horiba 20 B
Horiba FIA 21
iuu/juu/iuuu
*
79
Horiba AIA 21
100/500
97
Horiba AIA 21
" 3/7
2.02
Teco 10 series
25/100/250
19.2/96.8
Scott 4 Air Monit ,
Horiba, HP
Taylor
Bendix'
South Cell
Schenck
Horiba 20 A
Becktnan 108
1UW JUV/lUUU
86.8/273
Bendix .L'nior
Beckman 315 B
50/250/500/1000'
1500/5000/10000
47/220/958
Beckman 315 B
5
4.87
Teco 10 A
100/250/1000
87.6/219.5
Scott
Mod Comp
Sling Poycltrom.
Ethyl Corp.
South Cell
Clayton CPE 50
AMI 724 CFV
Bedkman 108
!*
U/Wlcuu
146.2
Beckman 315 A
1600/3200/6000
1525
Bectean 315 A
4Z
2.08
AMI mod. 32
25/100/250/1000
24.48
AMI
AMI
George, RH 125
*" *
Jeep Corp. ',
Cell $3
Clayton CTE 50
Horiba 20 B
Becknan 400
iu/iuu/luuu
78.9
Horiba AIA 21 AS
100/500/3000
69.1/374.4/2663
AIA 23 Horibs
sz, 57;
4.14
Beckman 951
10 - 10000
85.5
ACA
Digital
EC&C Inst.
Honda
. Chelsea C. 04
Clayton ECE 50
AMI 728
Beckuum 400
o/luu/25u
90.12
Bendix 8501-c
Beckcan 864
250/500/1000/2000
451.7
Beckman 864
2*, 6Z
1.8
Teco 10 AR
100/250
89.5
Scott
AMI
Aspirator Assy
Humidity
Sargent Walch
Sargent Welch
Sargent Welch
-------
ATTACHMENT A - Cont.
EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
FID
CO
NDIR
C02
NDIR
NOx
CLD
•**
Laboratory,
Date Nov. 80
Dyno
CVS
Make/
model
Range
ppm
Span gas
ppm • '
Make/
model
Range
ppo
Span gas
ppia
Make/
model
Range
Z '
Span gas
X
Make/
model
Range
ppn
Span gas
ppB
Span gas
made by
Computer
system
Humidity
detector
EPA
Site A003
Clayton CTE 50 '
Phllco CFV
Beckman 400
50/100/250/500
\
43.31/96.87/228.72
Bendtx MSA
250/500/1000 2500/5000
244.01/448.63/911.00 2298.8/4432.4
MSA . -
2.5X, 5*
2,363/3.899
Teco :
100/250
94.91/227.77
Scott
KTS
Sargent - Welch
-------
TABLE 3
Bottle Number
SRM Bottle Cone.
VW
% error
Holley Carb.
Z error
Ford
Z error
AMC
% error
Chrysler
Z error
Fiat
% error
Bendix
X error
Ethyl
% error
AMC-Jeep
% error
Honda
% error
ATL
Z error
WoA
% error
EPA
Z error
CO
FE5J04
137 ppm
138.0
0.73Z
140.0
2.19Z
137.3
0.22%
136.7
-0.22%
138.5
1.09%
137.2
' 0.14%
139.5
1.82%
153.0
11.68%
135.0
-1.46%
137.2
0.14%
137.3
0.22Z ...
137.1
0.07%
135.859
-0.83%
C02
CAL-1510
0.7536%
0.750
-0.48Z
0.750
-0.48%
0.748
-0.74%
0.770
2.18%
0.759
0.72%
0.752
-0.21%
0.769
2.04%
0.759
0.72%
0.748
-0.74%
0.750
-0.48%
0.746
-1.01%
0.750
-0.48%
0.7417
-1.58%
SPAN
NOx
CAL-5806
48.5 ppm.
48.9
0.82%
49.0
1.03%
48.4
-0.21%
"48.3
-0.41%
• 47.6
-1.86%
48.1
-0.82%
45.7
-5.77%
47.8
-1.44%
48.1
-0.82%
49.0
1.03%
48.4
-0.21%
48.5
0.0%
48.688
0.39%
GAS COMPARISON
Propane
FF5350
30.5 ppm RC
29.9
-1.97%
27.0
-11.47Z
30.8
0.98%
30.5
0.0%
31.2
2.29%
31.2
2.29%
29.5
-3.28Z
30.7
0.65%
30.4
-0.33%
30.3 .
-0.65Z
31.5
3.28% .
30.4
-0.33Z
30.544
0.14Z
Hexane
CAL-4563
29.0 ppm Hen
58.0 ppm HC
57.2
-1.38%
44.0
-24.14%
54.2
-6.55Z
5.6.4
-2.76Z
58.4
0.69%
56.12
-3.42%
56.9
-1.89Z
59.1
1.89%
56.0
-3.45%
57.0
-1.72%
57.4
-1.03%
57.4
-1.03Z
57.483
-0.89%
Octane
CAL-515T
20,8 ppm Oct
55.47 ppm HC
53.3
-3.91%
23.0
-58.54Z
49.4
-10.94%
51.7
-6.79%
55.0
-0.85%
53.0
-4.45%
53.7
-3.19%
55.3
-0.31Z
53.1
-4.27%
53.0
-4.45Z
53.4
-3.73Z
53.3
-3.91%
54.347
-2.02%
Butane
CAL-4576"
42.3 ppm But
56.4 ppm HC
55.1
-2.30%
53.0
-6.03%
54.2
-3.90%
55.4
-1.77%
56.0
-0.71%
i
55.3
-1.95%
55.2
-2.13%
56.6
0.35%
54.9
-2.66%
56.0
-0.71%
55.9
-0.88% .
55.5
-1.59%
56.092
-0.55Z
Z error =
HFR-NBS x 100
NB5 .
-------
LAB CORRELATION SUMMARY
PROCESShOJ APR Bt 1981
LAB
VWKOblN-80
i
N
VIM 53A 0010 893
INERTIA Wt 2250 ACTUAL HP 7.3
HC CO NOX C02 FE BA«0 HUM NXFC 08L HSL TLOSS
EPA
MEAN
STANDARD DtV
C.V.%
l< —G/MI— >| (MPG) TIN-HG) (GRAINS
I /L8)
0.430 3.34 0.51 314. 27.7 £9.41 47.31 0.88
.0140 0.064 .019 1. 0.1 0.026 1.228 .005
3.3 '1.9 3.8 0.3 0.3 0.09 2.60 0.51
VOLKSWAGEN-SET 1
MEAN
STANDARD OEV.
C.V.%
JIFF. *
0.423 3.45 0.56 334. 26.0 29.38 35.61 0.04
.0229 0.188 .033 7. 0.5 0.020 1.972 .007
5.4 5.4 5.8 2.1 2.1 0.07 5.5* 0.78
-2. 3. 11. 6. -6. -0. -25. -i>.
HOLLEY CARBURETOR
MEAN
STANDARD DEV.
C.V.%
OIFF. *
0.324 4.09 0.52 339. 25.6 29.40 50.50 0.90
.0320 0.218 .02V 8. 0.5 0.016 '2.642 .010
9.9 5.3 5.5 2.2 2.1 0.05 b.23 1.10
-25. 22. 3. 8. -8. -0. 7. 1.
H
n
FORD
MEAN 0.434 J.72 0.49 323. 26.9 29,17 54.13 0.91
STANDARD DEV. .0131 0.0e4 .024 2. 0.1 0.023 1.826 .007
C.v.% 3,'J 1.7 4.9 0.5 0.4 0.08 3.37 0.78
UIFF. * 2. 11. -4. 3. -3. -1. 14. 3.
AMERICAN MOTORS
MtAN
STA'jUAwO OEV.
C . V . *
UIFF. *
0.429 3.44 0.49 322. 26i9 29.23 48.25 O.B9
.0287 0.054 .030 4. 0.4 0.026 6.007 .023
6.7 1.6 6.1 1.3 1.4 0.09 12.45 2,b^
. -0. 3. -4, 3. -3. -1. I
t i .• r\
-------
BtNDIX
MtAN
STANDARD OEV.
C.V.%
01FF. %
0,473 3.56 0,*9 342. 26.2 29.5* 36.69 O.B5
.0275 0.106 .042 4. 0.3 0.011 6.096 .0*0
S.tt 3.0 8.5 1.1 1.0 0.04 16.62 2.J9
10. 6. -3. 9. -5. 0. -22. -<».
ETHYL
MEAN
STANDARD OEV.
c.v.%
OIFf. t
0,523 3.98 0.45 "335. 25.9"89.72 32.99 0.84
.0064 0.038 .027 5. 0 ,.4 0.030 5.662 .019
1.2 1,0 5.9 1.0 1.6! 0.10 17.16 2.22
22. 19. -10, 7. -7.A 1. -30. -6.
JtEP (KAISER)
MEAN
STAMDAWD OEV.
C.V.%
QIFF. fc
0.455 J.44 0.47 315. 27.6 29.41 45.42 0.88
.0285 0.130 .016 2. 0.2 0.037 2.300 .008
6.3 3.8 3.4 0.5 0.5 0.13 . 5.06 0,95
6. 3, -8. 0, -0. -0. -<», -1.
HONDA-ANN ARdOR
ATL-THC OHIO
0.477 3.65 0.47 309. 28.1 29.24 54.45 0.91
STANDAHU DEV. .0280 0.131 .013 1. 0.0 0.016 1.445 .006
C.V.% 5.9 3.6 2.8 0.3 0.1 0.06 2.65 0.63
OiFF. « . 11. 9. -7. -2. 1. -1. > 15. 3.
0.545 3.88 0.55 328. 26.4 29.01 65.24 0.96
OE.V. .0347 0.111 .033 3. 0.2 0.031 O.bUl .003
6.w 2,9 6,0 0.8 0.7 0,18 U.8S 0.27
27. 16. 9. 5. -5. -1. 3B. «.
C . V . '*
UIFF. *
H
H
O
^rj
'•?•
a
VOLKSwaGEN-SET 3
STAMDAHO OLV.
C.V.%
DIFF, %
0,517 3,87 0,46 323. 27.3 29.51 32.74 0.83
.0176 0.094 .021 4. 1.3 0.026 1.475 .005
3.4 2.4 4.7 l.J 4.8 0.09 4.50 0.59
20. 16. -10, 3. -1. 0. -31. -6.
VWOA
MhAN 0.460 3.70 0.50 326. 26.6 29.07 51.81 0.90
STANDARD UEV. .0139 0.073 .010 3. 0.2 0.0 4.116 .016
C.V.* 3.0 2.0 2.0 O.ts 0.6 0.0 7.94 1.73
UIFF. * 7. 11. -2. 4. -4. -1. 10. 2.
C.V.* IS THE COEFflClEivT OF VARIATION. (STO. OEV./MEAN »100).
UIFF.* IS THE OIFFtKLNCE OF Tn£ MtANS BtTwEEN THE MFH ANO EPA LABS. (MFH-EPA/EPA »100)
-------
EPA
TE
b-ttO
b'-BO
b-80
b-MO
b-BO
5-80
TESTMO
806891
806892
806893
806894
806895
806896
<
TYPE
FTMH
FT»'H
FT^H
FT^H
FTPH
FT^H
HC
0.428
0.43b
U.'*4J
0.440
0.412
0.4lb
VLH: \
CO
3.46
J.34
J.35
3.34
J.29
3.2H
LAB
CORRELATION
SUMMARY
- TEST DATA
/WWOBIM-ftO VJN1 53A 0010 893
NOX
0.53
0.51
0.48
0.53
0.50
0.50
C02
315.
314.
314.
315.
312,
314.
FE
27.6
27.7
27.7
27.6
27.8
27.7
(MPT.
DRIVER
0
0
0
0
0
0
\
OYNO
0004
0004
0004
0004
0004
0004
ODOM
8266.0
6280.0
8295.0
8313.4
6327.0
8342.0
IMP
b.6
b.to
5.6
. b.6
b.6
5.6
i
BARO
I'
29442
29f.41
29.40
£9.40
29.40
r iw-wr, i
PROCESSED: APR 8» ivai
INERTIA WT» 2250
HUM
45.63
46,78
47.81
47.65
46.73
49.24
ir.u/ft TM<
NAFC DBL HSL
0.88
0.88
0.89
0.89
0.88
0.89
; I <•__. ir.unM^
ACTUAL HPJ 7.3
TLOSS
/Lh)
STANDARD UEV.
C.V.%
O.«*30 J.34 0,51 314. 27,7
,OUO O.Uh4 .019 1. 0.1
3.J 1.9 3.H 0.3 0.3
29.41 47.31 0.88
0.026 1.228 .005
0.1 2.6 . 0.5
TE
TESTNO TYPE OYNU SlTt
CO
OAG DATA
NOX
C02
FE
G
2
Z
•S-MO
FTPH
0.4ll0.40y n.,477
:.U02 O.^JV 0.411 0,4b2
•b-60 806ti9b FTPH U00<»
•S-aO 806«96 FTPH OU04
0.427 0,46V
0.^04 0.40b 0.431
3.26
3.04
3.19
3.19
3.18
3.60 3.35 0.71 0.37 0.69 291.
3.50 3.25 0.71 0.35 O.f>6 288.
3.52 3.17 0.65 0.32 0.6b 290,
3.48 3.18 0.74 0.36 0.6s> 294.
3.41 3.13 0.69 0.33 0.67 289.
340. 287. 29.B 25.5 30.2
339. 287. 30.1 25.b 30.2
338. 287. 29.V 25.7 3U.2
338. 287. 29.b 25.7 30.2
335. 285. 30.1 25.9 30.4
0.41SI 0,412 3.06 3.43 3.17 0,68 0.34 0.68 293. 336. 287. 29.6 25.9 30.3
(ALL G/MI) l<-
DEV.
C . v . *
0.417 0,4>tf 3.1b 3.49
0.021 0.011 O.U29 O.OS* 0.07
4.V 2.6 0.4 2.9 1.9
3.21 0.70 0.34 0.67 291. 338. 287. 29.b 25.7 30.2
0.08 0.03 0.02 0.02 2. 2. 1. 0.2 0.2 0.1
2.4 4,4 5.4 2.4 0.8 0.6 0.3 0.8 0,6 0.3
C.V.* IS TM£ COEFFICIENT OF VflWI ATION. t STU. OEV./'iEAN «100>.
imF. * IS THE niFKt*tNCt OF THE MtflNS «ETv,EEN THE MFrt AND EPA LAB. (MFH-EPA/EPfl «100).
NOTE: THE COMMENTS PcKTlNENT TO THESE TESTS ARE LOCATED IN THE LAST TABLE OF THIS APPENOIX.
-------
I VOLKSWAGEN-SET 1
ATE TESTNO TYPE
31-80 101 FTPH
31-80 102 FT^H
31-BO 103 FTPH
31-80 104 FTPH
31-80 105 FTPH
31-60 106 FT^H
MEAN
STANDAWD OEV.
C.V.%
OIFF. %
HC
.0.386
0 ,444
0.422
0.414
0.423
0.45U
. 022V
^•««
-2.
Vtn: \
CO
J.19
J.37
3.37
3.49
3.55
LAri
COHKELATION
SUMMAKY
- TEST UATA
fwwudIN-6u VINJ 53A 0010 093
NOX
0.62
0.57
0.56
0.56
0.55
3.74 0.52
3.45 0.56
O.lhB
5.4
3.
.033
5.H
11.
C02
322.
J41.
3J7.
338.
331.
337.
- i
334.
7.
2.1
b.
FE
27.0
25.5
25.6
25.7
26.2
ORIVEK
1
1
1
1
1
/ LtOf" \
DYNO
.
1
1
1
1 .
1
1
OOOM
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
IMrOJ
26.0
0.5
2.1
-6.
IHP BARO
1'
4.0 29. (4 3
4.0 29*«»2
4.0 29.*39
4.0 29.36
4.0 29.34
4.0 29.33
29.38
• . , 0.020
0.1
-0.
PkOCESStDS APR fl» 1981
INEMTIA WT: 2250 ACTUAL HP: 7.3
HUM
34.17
32.65
37.45
37.45
36.86
35.07
1 f Lj A T M C
I w W & i N 5
35.61
1.972
5.5
-25.
NXFC OBL HSL TLOSS
0.84
0.83
0.85
0.65
0.85
0.84
0.84
.007
0.8
-5.
flTE TESTNO TYPf: OVMO SITE
31-80
31-bO
31-^0
31-BO
31-aO
31-ttO
101 FTHH 1
102 FTPH 1
103 FTHH 1
104 FTf-H 1
105 FTPH 1
106 FTPH 1
1 0.376 0..173 0.<* 23. J 28.6
3.46 3.33 0.73 0.39 0.73 305. 365. 304. 20.5 23.8 2«.6
3.00 3.47 0.72 0.42 0.73 305. 370. 303. 28.5 23.5 28.6
3.66 3.56 0.68 0.40 0.73 300. 358. 304, 2«.9 24.3 28.5
3.91 3.73 0.64 0.36 0.75 305. 368. 3(J2. 28.
(ALL G/"II)
23.6 28.7
— CMPGJ — -
o
3
C.v.%
OIFF. *
0.3-*0 0.417 0.464 3.21 3.57
O.Ola 0.02d 0.027 0.10 0.21
4.6 6.7 5.9 3.1 6.0
-H. -i), 1, 2. 2.
3.42 0.71 0.40 0.76 302. 364. 302. 28.8 23.9 28.8
0.22 O.Ob 0.03 0.04 5. 9. 4. 0.4 0.6 0.4
6.5 7.9 6.8 4.9 1.5 2.6 1.4 1.5 2.6 1.4
7. 3. 16. 13. 4, «. 5. -4. -7. -5.
C.V.* IS THE COEfFlCItuT Of VARIATION. (STL). UEV./MEAN «100).
UIFF. i IS THE DlFf-tKtNCt UF THt MEANS HETwLEN THE MF« ANO EPA LAB. (MFH-EPA/EPA »100).
NOTF.: THE COMMtNTS PcWTjNtNT TO THESE TESTS AKE LOCATED IN THE LAST TABLE OF THIS APPENDIX,
-------
LAB CORRELATION SUMMAKY - TEST DATA
PROCESSED! APR 81 19<5l
HOLLEY CAHBURETOW
E
-80
-HO
-80
-80
-80
-faO
TESTNO
201
202
203
204
205
206
TYPE
FT^H.
FTHH
FTPH
KTMH
FT^H
FTPH
nC
0.2V6
O.JOJ
0.280
O.J4/
0.352
0. J60
VLH: \
CO
3.80
3.84
4.16
4.22
4.2V
/*KOBIN-80 VIN» 53A 0010 893
NO*
0.58
0.52
0.50
0.51
0.51
4.2b 0.53
CU2
350,
338.
329.
336.
337.
346.
FE
24.8
2b.7
86.3
25.8
25.7
OHIVEK
I
I
1
1
1
25.1 1
DYNO
2
2
2
2.
2
2
ODOM
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
IhP
0.0
0.0
u.o
0.0
0.0
0.0
1 Mr(j)
BAHO
29;40
29UO
29*40
29.*40
69.40
29.40
/ T M UC \
\ IN— HuJ
INERTIA WTI 2250 ACTUAL HP» 7.3
HUM
47.81
46.59
53.16
51.62
51.88
51.96
/ f D A T MC
(Or A INS
NXFC DBL
0.89
0.8B
0.91
0.90
0.90
0.90
(^ t
<--- (
HSL TLOSS
GH AMS ) «•«> i
STANDAPO DEV.
C.V.*
UIFF. %
0.3?4 4.0V 0.52 339. 25.6
.032U 0.218 ,029 fl. 0.5
9.V 5.3 5,b 2.2 2.1
-2b. 22. 3. 8. -8.
29.40 50.50 0.90
0.016 2.642 .010
0.1 5.2 1.1
-0. 7. 1.
it TESTNO
UYNO SITE
1-60
1-BO
i-eO
201 FTHH 2
202 FTHH 2
203 FTPH 2
204 FTPH 2
205 FTPH 2
20b FTPH 2
2
2
UIFF. *
0.32d 0.2V7 0.371 3.90
U.032 0.035 0.032 0.15
9.d 11.H A.f 3.9
-23. -2V. -19. 24.
4.16 4.12 0.66 0.36 0,74 318. 364. 310. 27.3 23.9 27.9
0.30 0.13 O.O/ 0.02 0.04 12. 9, 7, 1.0 0.5 0.7
7.1 3.2 10.7 5.1 4.8 3.7 2.5 2.4 3.5 2.3 3.4
19. 28. -6. 4. lu. 9. 8. 8. -8. -7. -8.
.V.t IS TH£ CUF.FFICItNl OK VflKl AT ION. (S>TU. DEV./M£AN «100J.
IFF. + IS THE nlFFt-
-------
LArf CORRELATION SUMMARY .- TtST DATA
PHOCESStDt APR 8f 1981
.
11 F'OMO
ATE
04-80
104-«0
104-80
104-60
104-faO
MEAN
STAN
c.v.
DIFF
>ATE
04-«0
04-60
o^-ao
O't-dO
04-80
04-60
MEAN
STAN'
TESTNO TYPE MC
301 FToH. 0.430
302 FTPH 0.<*3f
303 FTHH 0.431
304 F Tf-'H 0.422
305 FTi-'H 0.<*5«
306 FT^H 0.451
U.43*
DAPO DEV. .0131
* 3.0
.
0.403 0
0.3V6 0
O.<*02 0
U,.Wd 0
0.<«JU 0
0.420 0
0.407 0
0.015 0
3.6
-2.
26.9
0.1
0.4
-3.
3 CO
*w «•• <^
.4H8 3.63
.<«S>b 3.60
.^67 . 3.71
.473 3.60
.508 3.64
.508. 3.38
.4VO 3.59
.U17 0.11
3.5 3.1
7. 14,
•
<;
j.
3.
3.
3.
3.
3.
3.
0.
2
BAG DATA
.
3 NOX
91 3.67 0.
82 3.69 0.
76 3.69 0.
74 3.57 0.
87 3.74 0.
72 . 3.64 0.
(ALL G/MI
60 3.b7 0.
08 0.06 0.
.0 1.6 6
71
59
6J
67
61
62
)
64
0«»
.9
9. 14. -tt.
NXFC
0.91
0.90
0.90
0.92
0.92
0.92
i*!1* — nu» \unttiii3
/LB)
29.17
0,023
0.1
-1.
2 3
0.39 0.68
0.34 0.61
0.37 0.60
0.36 0.56
0.32 0.62
0.34 0.65
0.35 0.62
Oo03 0.04
7.1 6.7
2. -6.
54.13
1.826
3.4
14.
S
ro<2
301.
297.
297.
299.
301.
299.
299.
2.
0.6
3.
0.91
.007
0.8
3.
2
347.
347,
348.
342.
346.
343.
346,
2.
0,7
2.
DBL HSL TLOSS
3 FF 2 3
297. 28. ti 25.0 29.1
294. 29.1 25.0 26.7
299. 29.1 25.0 29.0
29<*. 28.9 25.4 29.4
295, 28.8 25.1 29.4
298. 29.0 25.3 29.1
l<— (MPG) >l
29b. 28.9 25.1 28.8
2. 0.1 C.2 1.0
0.7 0.5 0.7 3.6
3. -3. -2, -5.
H
O
C.V.*, IS THE COEFFICItNT OF VAKJ AT ION. C5TU. OEV./-1EAN «100).
U1FF. * IS THE DlFFh^tNCL UK THE MhflNS HLTWEEN THE MFK ANU EPA LAB. (MFH-EPA/EHA °100).
NOTE: THE COMMENTS HEKTINENT To TriESt TtbTS A^£ LOCATED IN Tn£ LAST TABLE OF THIS APPENuI*.
-------
XORKELATION SUMMAWY - TEST O&TA
PHOCESSEDI APR 8« 1981
J AMERICAN MOTOWS
aTE TESTNO TYPE HC
05-80
05-80
05-80
05-80
05-80
05-80
MEflN
C.V.*
OIFF.
401 FTPH
402 FT^H
403 FTPH
404 FTPH
405 FTHH
406 FTPH
*0 UEV.
%
• 0.3*1
0.433
0.428
y ,««6J
0.452
0.41tJ
U.42*
.02H7
6./
-0.
VEH: \
CO
3.42
J.40
J.47
J.53
3.41
3.39
3.4<»
0.054
1.6
3.
'*WOtfIN-80 VINt 53A 0010 893
NOX
0.54
0.4b
0.50
0.48
0.49
0.45
0.49
.030
b..l
-4.
CO?
324.
324.
321,
317.
319.
329,
322.
4.
1*3
3.
FE DRIVE* DYNO
26.8
26.6
27.0
27.4
2 7.3
26.4
( MPG )
26.9
0.4
1.4
-3.
1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2 .
12
1 2
OOOM IHP
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0 .
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1
.
BAkO
29.24
29J?4
29Vf3
29.22
2(9.23
29.24
( IN-HG)
29.23
0.026
0.1
-1.
INEHTIA »Tt 2250 ACTUAL HPJ 7.3
HUM NXFC DBL HSL TLOSS
49.11 0.89
59.89 0.93
46.15 0.88
46,15 0.88
44.77 0.88
43.43 0.87
(GKAINS |<— (GHAMS)— >l
/LH)
48,25 0.89
6.007 .023
12.4 2.6
2. 0.
UAG DATA
ATE TESTNO TYP'
SITE.
Oi-OO
03-oO
03-eO
03-dO
03-80
Os-oO
^
C . V . *
UIFF.
401
402
4(J3
404
405
406
iHO DE
*
FTPH
f- TPH
FTPH
t TPH
FTPH
FTHH
:v.
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
£
2
2
2
2
.
0 J62
U.4ltt
U.439
0 .i>22
0.442
0.385
U.411
U.OJ2
7.7
-3.
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
.365
«42b
.421
.4rtO
««»5J
.432
.429
,038
H.9
3.
U
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
.*2J
.<*31
.4J7
.461
.tou
.416
.4^2
.U2U
«*,5
-3,
CO
3.36
3.35
3.22
3.19
3.27
0.07
2.2
4.
NOx
(.02
3.29 3.50 3.73 0,7«» 0.42 0.64 300. 351. 292. 29.(J 24.8 29.7
3.22 3.45 3.43 0.62 0.35 0.63 297. 353. 290. 29.3 24.7 29.8
3.58 3.34 0.64 0.36 0.62 299. 349. 285, 29.1 24.9 30.4
3.69 3.37 0.63 0.35 0.61 298. 342. 282. 29.1 25.4 30.7
3.52 3.33 0.62 0.38 0.62 293, 343. 291. 29.6 25.3 29.8
3.57 3.30 0.59 0.33 0.59 304. 359. 293. 26.6 24.2 29.6
(ALL O/MIJ
•U--(MPG)
3.55 3.42 0.64 0.37 0.62 299. 350. 289. 29.1 24.9 30.0
0.08 0.16 0.05 0.03 0.02 4. 6. 4. 0.3 0.4 0.4
2.3 4.7 8.1 8.7 2.8 1.2 1.6 1.5 1.1 1.7 105
2. 6. -8, 7. -8. 3. 4. J. -2. -3. -1.
C.V.'* IS THE COFFFICltNl OF VA*IATION. (5TO. DEV,/*ltAN »100).
OIFF. * IS THE nlFffc.Kt.NCt UF THt, M£flf>*S HETrfEEN THf MF« AND EPA LAB. (MFH-EPA/EPA °100).
THE COMMENT5 HtHTlNtM TU TnLSti TEbTS ARE LOCATED IN ThE LAST TABLE OF THIS APPENDIX.
-------
,
: CHRYSLEW
ATE
06-bO
06-BO
06-80
06-00
06-60
06-80
TESTNO
501
502
503
504
5U5
506
TYPE
FTHH
f TPH
F T'-'H
FT LrM
I " "^
r T^H
FTPH
HC
•0.402
0.41J
0.4^
u.4,j/
0.4J7
0.430
i <-.--
LAN
CORRELATION
VtHI VwWOBlN-8f)
CO
3.49
3.4b
3.61
3. SI
3.51
3.63
NOX
0.50
0.49
0.48
0.49
0.50
C02
312.
310.
308.
314.
314.
315.
FE
27. «
2tt .0
28. i
27.6
27.7
DRIVEH
1
1
1
1
1
27.5 1
(MPr, i
SUMMARY
- TtST DATA
VINJ 53A 0010 893
OYNO
4
4
4
4
4
4
ODOM
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
OcO
I HP
0.0
0.0
U.O
0.0
0.0
0.0
I
BAkO
1
38.192
28J89
28.-% 7
28.82
28.77
28.75
[ TM-HT, >
/ ' .'• PHOCEbSEDt APH 8t 1981
INERTIA wit 225o
HUM
47.62
43,49
43.49
44.60
46.26
42.08
tr,pA TM<
NXFC DBL HSL
0.89
0.87
0.87
0.88
0.88
0,87
; 1 e ___ fr.LjAwtCL
ACTUAL HPI 7.3
TLOSS
».--> I
/LH)
STANOAWO
C.V.%
DIFF. *
3.53 0.49 312. 27.8
0.071 .004 3. 0.2
3.5 2.U ^.8 U.V U.b
-1. b. -4. -1. 0.
28.84
0.063
0.2
-2,
44.59 0.87
2.035 .007
4.6 .0.8
-6. -1.
BAG DATA
H
>
TESTNO TYPE OYNO S IT E '-C
Ot>-dO
Ob-aO
Ob-bO
0&-bO
Ob-bO
Ob-hO
501 FTPH 4
502 FTi-'H 4
503 FTPH <*
504 FTHH 4
505 FTPH 4
506 FTr>H 4
4
!
STANDARD DEV.
C.v.%
0.40K 0.427 0.43J 3.31
O.Olv 0.027 0.023 0.16
4.7 6.3 a.«« 4.8
-4. 2. -b. b.
3.74 3.31 0.64 0.36 0.62 291. 336, 283. 29.8 25.8 30.6
0.11 0.10 0.02 0.02 0.01 3. 4. 2. 0.3 0.3 0.3
3.0 3.0 3.8 4.1 1.4 1.0 1.0 O.S 1.0 1.0 0.9
7. 3. -9. b. -tt. -0. -0. -1. 0. 0. 1.
c.v.* is THE coEFFicitur of VAKIATION.(STO. DEV./MEAN «ioo>.
UIFF. * Is THE niFFE-tNCt OF THE rtEaNJi bLTwEEN THE MFH AND EPA LAB. JMFR-EPA/EPA «100).
NOTE: THE COMMENTS Pt-KUNENT TO THESE TfcSfS ARE LOCATED IN THE LAST TABLt OF THIS APPENDIX.
-------
LAb COKKELATION
,
VOLKSWAGEN-SET 2
TE
7-WO
/-80
/-ttO
7-eo
7-bO
7-80
MtAN
TESTNO
601
602
603
604
60S
606
•
TYPE
FTPH
FT^H
FT^H
FT»H
FTPH
FT^H
HC
0.399
0.4h4
O.^ttl
0.509
0.461
O.blb
0.472
STAMDAHU OEV. .U4£«i
C.v.
DIFF
.
,TE
07-80
07-rtO
10 7 -en
07-tfO
O'-dO
07-dO
*
. £
TEbT.NO
bOl
bO 3.10
0.503 0.515 O.b02 3.44
0.4i>5 0.433 0.322 3.10
U.479 0.540 O.bOl 3.29
SUMMAKY -
VINt 53A 0010
OYNO
1
1
1
1 .
1
1
TEST DATA
893
ODOM IHP BAHO
0.0 4
0.0 4
0,0 4
0.0 . 4
0.0 4
0.0 4
i*
.0 2B.J93
.0 2ti«S92
.U 28 &2
.0 28.89
.0 38.84
PKOCESSEOt APH
INE.HTIA WTI 2250 ACTUAL
HUH
45*44
39*21
43.49
57.75
42.08
.0 28.81 47.89
NXFC
0.88
0,h6
0.87
0.93
O.B7
0.89
**n-nv>; IUKAIMS
/Lrt)
SAG
2
3.37
3.53
3.62
3,76
3.63
3.82
OATA
3 ^lOX
3.06 0.69
3.14 0.65
3.33 0.63
3.27 0.65
3.32 0.63
3.14.0.59
28.68
0.041
0.1
-2.
2 3
0.45 O.bl
0.40 0.5b
0.38 0.5B
0.44 0.69
0.41 0.57
0.33 0.61
45.98
6.476
14.1
-3,
f
r.02
298.
301.
300.
297.
299.
299.
0.88
.024
.2.8
•0.
2
366.
368.
364.
362.
359.
362.
OBL HSL TLOSS
'
3 FF ? 3
302. 29.2 23,8 27.
299, 28.9 23.6 29.
30b. 29. U 23.9 2tt.
299. 29,2 24.0 2V.
298. 29.1 24.2 29.
297, 29.0 24,0 29.
8t 1981
MPl 7.3
8
0
4
1
1
2
(ALL G/MI) !< — (MPGJ— >{.
MEflN
SMN
C.v.
OIFF
OAPO OF.
*
. *
V.
0.4<»^ 0.470 0.494 3.14
0.047 0.05<* 0.03«* 0.20
IC.b 11.5 b.v &. 2
t>. 13. ti. -1.
3.62
0.16
4.5
4.
3.21 0,64
0.11 0.03
3.5 5.1
o. -a.
0.40 0.60
U.04 0.05
10.8 7.B
16. -10.
299.
1.
0.5
3.
364,
3.
0.9
8.
300. 29.1 23.9 28.
3. 0.1 0.2 0.
1.0 0.4 0.9 1.
8
t>
9
5. -3. -7. -5.
o
2
w
o
C.V.* IS THE COF.FFlCltrjT Of Vft* I AT ION. .
uirr. * it, THE niFft^-tNCt OF THt MtaNb HLT«EEN THE. MFH AND EPA LAB. IMFK-EPA/EPA «ioo>.
NUlf: THE COH.MtN7b Pt^TlNtrvT TO TrifcSt ItSIb AwE LOCATED IN THE LAST TABLE OF THIS APPENDIX.
-------
LAM CORRELATION SUMMARY - TEST OATft
PHUCEbSEDJ AMR 8« IVUl
1
iftTE
10-80
-10-80
=10-80
=10-80
-10-80
10-80
TESTNO
701
702
/03
704
705
706
TYPE
FTPH
f T^ri
KTPH
FTPrt
FT"H
FTPH
HC
•0.350
0.360
0.410
0.389
O.J76
0.376
CO
3.36
3.32
3.47
3.44
3.42
NOX
0.58
0 .52
0.50
0.50
0.51
3.38 0.48
C02
325.
320.
314.
315.
315.
301.
FE
27.8
28.2
28.8
2H.6
28.7
ORIVEK
1
1
1
1
1
30.0 1
f MP(.)
V1NI 53A 0010 893
OtNO
1
1
1
1 •
1
1
OOOM '.
0.0
0.0"
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
T fr*U
i rt"
'o.o
^ 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
BARO
29.M
29. Cl
29 4 1
29.43
2^9.43
29.43
I IfvJ-HT, 1
INERTIA WT1 2250 ACTUAL HPJ 7.3
HUM
27.60
27.60
27.60
27.02
27.02
27.02
ir,an IMC
NXFC DHL
0.82
0.82
0.82
0.82
0.82
0.82
HSL TLOSS
/LH)
STANDARD OEV.
C.V.*
OIFF. %
0.3/d 3.<.0 O.bl 315. 2B.
,0.J 1.7 «j«7 «i.S 2.
-12. 2. 1. '). 4
29.42 27.31 0.«2
0.036 0.317 .001
0.1 1.2 .0.1
0. -42. -8.
BAG IJATA
H
^
DATE TESTNO TYPK UYfjO SITE
-10-BO
-10-ao
-10-80
=10-00
-10-80
-JU-80
701 FT^M 1
702 FTHM 1
703 FTfH 1
/04 FT^H 1
705 FTPH 1
70^ FTPH 1
1
1
i
1
1
1
0.3J' 0.337 H.JO*3
O.JH5 O..th5 O.J6J
0.4/;b 0 .M 7 O.** Ib
. 0. J47 O.JV4 0.-+13
O.JoH 0.3»i3 O.Jtse
0.357 0.381 0.3/V
CO
3.47
3.J4
3.47
3.32
3.34
3.24
3.37 3,25 0.74 0.43 0.76 303. 349. 298. 29.B 26.0 30.3
3.4b 3.03 0.72 0.37 O.f>8 296. 344. 293. 30.«* 26.3 30.8
3.56 3.29 0.6B 0.35 0.67 291. 336. 287. 30.9 26.9 31.4
3.52 3.39 0.6V 0.34 0.64 294. 339. 2fa8. 3u.7 26.7 31.4
3.46 3,<*0 0.69 0.33 0.68 292. 338. 288. 30,9 26.8 31.3
3.46 3.32 0.63 0.35 0.62 282. 322. 276. 32.0 28.1 32.7
ULL G/MI) 1 <••- (MPG)— ->l
H
n
Mt-N
STANDA40 OLV.
C . V . %
OIFF. t
0.376 O.JVJ 3.36
0.034 0.()^li 0.02-0 0.09
9.3 7.J 5.2 2.7
-14. -In. -15. 7.
3.47 J.28 0.69 0.36 0.67 293. 33ft. 288. 30.8 26.8 31.3
0.06 0.13 0.04 0.03 O.U5 7. 9. 7. 0.7 0.7 0.8
1.8 4.1 5.4 9.1 7.1 2.3 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.7 2.6
-1. 2. -1. 6. 0. 1. 0. 1. 3. <». 4.
C.V.t IS THE COEFFICItNl OF van I AT I ON. (STU. DKV./'-iEAN MOO).
UIFF. * Ib THE OlFf t-ft'iCt (Jf THt Mtfc\'S uETwEEw THE MF« ANO EPA LAB. (HFR-EPA/EPA oJOO).
NOTF.: THE COMMtNTS Pt*UNENT TO THtbE lESlb a«E LOCATED IN TH£ LAST TABLE OF THIS APPENDIX.
-------
LA8 COHKEXAT10M SUMMAHY - TEST OATfc
PHOCtSStOt APR B, 1981
OENU1X VtHI Vtf«OdlN-H(i '
TE
1-80
1-80
1-BO
1-60
1-BO
1-80
TESTNO
801
802
803
804
805
806
TYPE
FTPH.
FTPH
KT'-'H
KTPH
FTPH
KTPH
rtC
0.42B
0.470
0.467
0.469
0.507
0.49b
CO
3.39
3.57
3.54
3.51
3.69
3.64
NOX
0.57
0.47
0.46
0.50
0.46
0.49
C02
34*.
342.
343.
341.
341.
338.
FE
25.
2b.
26.
26.
26.
(MP
ORIVEH
U 1
o •
2 1
2 1
4 1
4 1
5 1
r,»
VIN* 53A 0010 893
DYNO
VJUT
sou r
SuUT
SUUT
SOUT
SOUT
ODOM
0.0
0.0
0.0
U.O
0.0
0.0
IHP
0.0
o.o
0.0
. U.O
0.0
0.0
BAHO
29-53
29 I
MEAN . .
STftNOARO OEV.
C. v. '*
DIFF.. *
3.56 O.^V 3^»2. 26.2
02^5 0.106 .0^2 ^». U.3
b.3 3.0 B.b 1.1 1.0
10. 6. -3. 9. -5.
TE
TESTMO TYHF DY.jU ^Ilfc
CU
M£.iN
C.V.t
OIFF.
UEV.
0.4t>l
0.02H 0.034 0.034
s.3 7.2 1.2
6. lb. 3.
3.16
0.10
3.1
0.
dAG DATA
29.54 36.69 0.85
0.011 6.098 .020
0,0 16.6 2.4
0. -22. -A.
1-80
1-BO
1-bO
1-80
1-80
1-80
1U1
au2
H03
804
805
ft06
fTPH
FTPH
FTPH
FTPH
FTPH
FTPH
Suur
suur
Soul
SUUT
SUUT
suur
suur
suur
SUUT
SUUT
buUT
suur
0
0
0
0
0
u
.42j"
.«*b2
.411
.4b<;
.4/3
.483
0
U
0
0
0
0
.42b
9 ^ r w
• ^* 7 *3
.480
.511
.524
0 . <* 34
0 . **o4
0.tV4
0.455
O.i^lo
0.4SO
3.30
3.21
3.04
3.11
3.23
3.08
3.62
3.93
3.93
3.84
4.U2
4.04
2
3.62
3.93
3.93
3.84
4.U2
4.04
3.89
0.15
3.9
12.
3
3.
3.
3.
3.
3.
3.
ULL
3.
0.
4
02
15
18
19
43
30
'»*
0.73
0.56
0.56
0.6X
0.56
0.57
2
0.48
0.36
0.36
0.39
0.35
0.37
3
0.62
O.bV
0 .bB
0.63
0.60
0.64
<:02
319.
310.
309.
304.
305.
305,
2
383.
373.
374.
375.
375.
368.
3
308.
308.
308.
304.
304.
308.
li/MI)
21
14
.3
0.
0.60
0.07
10.9
-14.
0.38
0.05
12.6
12.
O.tol
0.02
3.9
-9.
309.
6.
1.8
6.
375.
5.
1.3
11.
307.
2.
0.7
7.
F6
27.3
28.0
26.2
28.6
2B.b
26.6
t<-r
28.2
0.5
1.8
-S.
2
22.8
23.3
23.2
23.3
23.2
23.6
(MPG)
23.2
0.3
1.1
-10.
3
28.2
2«.2
28.2
28.6
28.5
28.2
— -> 1
28.3
0.2
0.6
-6.
H
n
C.V.t 15 THt COFFFICItNT Of VaKlAT ION.(STU. DEV./wEftN »100».
OIFF. •* IS THE niFFtktNCt UF TMt «Ei^S HtlftEEN THE MFK AND EPA (.AB. (MFR-EPA/EPA <>100).
THE-COMMtNTS HtHllNtNT TU THESE TtSTb Ai
-------
LAd CORRELATION SUMMARY - TEST DATA
PKOCESStOt APH 8» 19B1
A8: ETHYL
DATE
1-12-80
1-12-faO
1-12-BO
1-12-80
1-12-BO
1-12-BO
TESTNO
901
902
V03
904
V05
V06
TYPE
F TPH
FT^'H
KTPH
FTMH
F T^-H
FTMH
HC
0.520
o.bir
0.52J
o.5j<;
0 .51«»
0.524
1 <----
VLH: VWWOHIN-BO
CO
3.W
J.V4
4.02
4.03
NOX
0.50
0.46
0*44
0.46
0.45
3.96 0.42
C02
343.
339.
336.
334.
331.
328.
FE
2^.3
25.6
2S>.8
26.0
26.2
26.4
DRIVEN
1
1
1
1
1
1
»
VIN: b'3A 0010 893
DYNO
1
1
1
1.
1
1
DOOM
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
IHP BARO
0.0 29J.73
0.0 2%72
0.0 29*73
0.0 '29.71
0.0 ^29.72
0.0 2V. 74
( TN-ur, i
INEKTIA *TI 225o ACTUAL HPJ 7.3
HUM
32.99
32.99
28.99
41.00
37.01
24.99
ir,Uft in
NXFC DBL HSL TLOSS
0.84
0.84
O.B2
O.B6
0.65
o.ai
/Lb)
MhiN
STANDARD DEV.
C.V.* •
UIFF. %
J.VH 0.4b 335. 2^.9
.00h4 O.UJH .027 5. '0.4
1.2 l.n 5.Si 1.6 1.6
22. IV. -10. 7. -7.
29,72 32.99 0.84
0.030 5.662 .019
0.1 17.2 2.2
1. -30. -b.
BAG DATA
UATE TESTNO
UY.NQ SITE -r
1-
1-
1-
1-
1-
1-
12-80
12-bO
12-t<0
U-eO
12-00
12-BO
MtAN
901
9o2
Vu3
904
905
906
FTPH 1
FTt^H 1
F IP^ 1
FTPH 1
FTMH 1
FTPH 1
STANUAWU UE.V.
C . V , i
UIFF.
9,
1 0
1 ' 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
0
u
.<«53
.<«t>2
. <*vy
.506
.'•bl
.4WJ
.<.7V
.U2J
<•. 7
U.
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
.512
.SJ1
.541
.5 Jo
.514
.524
.527
.012
2.3
?6.
0
0
0
y
0
°
0
0
,b04
.iJ3
.DUb
.3HI)
.545
,34f
.52V
.ulv
3.7
15.
CO
3.80
3.57
3.78
3.6V
3.62
3.4V
3.66
0.12
3.3
16.
2
4.00
4.17
4.17
4.24
4.09
4.23
4.15
0.09
2.2
19.
3
3.
3.
3.
3.
3.
3.
(«LL
3.
0.
2
71
78
VI
88
88
79
1°:
0.6B
0.60
0.5b
0.5V
0.59
0.56
2
0.37
0.33
0.31
0.32
0.31
0.27
3
0.64
0.61
0.59
0.64
Oo60
0.61
002
318.
313.
305.
305.
303.
302.
2
365.
364.
358.
355.
353.
350.
3
321.
311.
319.
315.
30V,
307.
FE
27.3
27.7
28.4
28.4
28.6
28.7
Q/MI) l< —
83
08
.0
19.
0.59
O.Ob
7.7
-15.
0.32
0.03
10.2
-b.
0.61
0.02
3.4
-V.
308.
6.
2.1
6.
358.
6.
1.7
' 6.
314.
6.
1.8
9.
28.2
0.6
2.0
-6.
2
23.8
23.8
24.2
24.4
24.6
24.8
1
27.6
0.4
1.5
-9.
H
O
n
C.V.* IS THE CUEFFlClt..vl Oh V**l AT ION. 151 0. DEV. /MEAN «100).
OIFF. t IS THK CjIFFtKtNCE oF THE HtflNS B£T«EEN THE MFrt AND EPA LAB. (MFw-EPA/EPA «100).
NOTE: TME coMMtMs HLKTINLNT jo THLSE TESTS AKE LOCATED IN THE LAST TABLE OF THIS APPENDIX.
-------
LAB CORRELATION SUMMARY - TEST DATA
PROCESSED* APH e» ival
JEEP
!h
-80
-bO
-80
-80
-bO
.
MEAN
(KAISER)
TESTNO TYPE
1001 FTPH.
1002 KTPH
1003 KT'-'H
1004 F'TPH
1005 FTPH
— —
STANDARD DFV.
C.V.
01FF
TE
3-bO
J-WO
j-ao
j-tfO
3-dO
t
. *
VEH: VWWOBIN-MW
HC
o.-*o«
0.46U
O.W/
0.45J
0.470
0.453
.0^83 0
b.J
*.
•
TESTNO TYPE: DYNU SITE
1 001 FTPH I
10C2 f TPH 1
1U03 FTPH 1
1004 FfPH 1
1005 FTPH 1
1
1
1
1
1
CO NO'X C02
3.l,*Cl^_M&|
<— — — IGWAMo J •— — > |
•
3 FE 2 3
289. 29.5 25.9 30.
292. 30.0 25.9 29.
290. 29.0 25.5 29.
|
MEAN
STANUAWD OEV.
C.V.
IHFF
*.
. *
0.<*J3 0.4/1 0
0.018 0.0<«b 0
£» ,f> IJ.tJ
2. 1 J.
.431 3.19
. U
O
O
C.V.% IS THE COF.FFlCltNT OK VA*I ATI ON. (STO. OEV./"£AN «100).
JIFF, 't Ib THE nIFFEKtNLt OF THt MtiNS HtTwtEN THE MF« ANU EHA LAB. (MF»-EPA/£PA »100).
NOTE: THE COMMENTS PtKTlNENT TO THESE TESTs AKE LOCATED IN THE LAST TABLE OF THIS APPENOlX.
-------
COKKLLAT.10N SUMMAHY - TEST DATA
PHOCESStOt APR 8» 1981
?: HUNDA-ANN ARBOR
UTE
14-80
14-80
14-80
•i^-eo
14-bO
14-80
MEAN
TESTNO TYPE HC
1
1
1
1
1
1
101 FT^H. 0.424
102 FT^H o«4^s
103 FT^rt 0.4H1
104 FT^H O.bOl
105 FT'-'H o«'»70
106 FT^H o.489
0.47V
STANDAPO DEV. .02HO
C.V.
OIFF
>»TE
-1<*-80
. Ji»-tlf)
•1<.-«0
r.j<»-eo
•1^-ttO
•I"— 80
%
• o
b.*
11.
*
TESTKO TYPF UYNU Si
1
}
1
1
1
1
lUl FTMH 1
J02 FT>H 1
103 FTHH 1 •
104 FTPH I
105 FTPH 1
106 FTPH I
VEH: vw
^OdlN-Ho
CO NOX C02 FE OWIVEH
3.41 0
3.VS ()
.45 310, 2rt.l 1
.48 310. 28.0 1
3.74 U,<»7 308. 7
0.31 0.65
0.31 O.bb
0.33 0.66
0.32 0.14
INEHTIA wTJ 22SO ACTUAL HP1 7.3
HUM
56.42
55.56
54.90
53.88
53.39
52.54
/LH)
54,45
1 ,<»4i
2.7
15.
/
C02
2rf9.
288.
286.
286.
286.
287.
NXFC
0.92
0.92
0.91
0.91
0.91
0.90
O.V1
.006
.0.6
3.
Z
332.
333.
330.
330.
332.
331.
(ALL G/MH
MEAN
STAN
C.V.
OIFF
DAW
i,
, *
J UtV,
0.-70
0.03b
7.^
11.
0.45B O.sl7 3.43.
0.029 0.029 0.13
6.3 b.o 3.8
in. 13. 9.
3.82
0.17
4. A
9.
3.50
0.09
2.5
9.
0.6J
0.01
2.2
-10.
0.31 O.b4
0.01 0.')3
3.3 «t.4
-9, -<*.
287.
lo
0.4
-1.
331.
1.
0.4
-2.
OBL HSL TLOSS
3 ff. 2 3
282. 30.1 26.1 30.8
282. 30.1 26.0 30.6
283. 30.2 26.3 30.6
282. 30.3' 2b.3 30.7
280. 30.3 26.1 30.9
280, 30.1 2ft. 2 30.9
t<— (MPQ»- — >l
282. 30.2 26.2 30, »
1. 0.1 0.1 0.1
0.4 0.3 0.5 0.4
-2. U 2. 2.
o
r>
C.V.t IS THE COFfFlCJtNl OF VAKI at ION.(SfO. OEV./MEAN «100).
OJfF. * IS THt n!Ff t^t'^Ct. OF THE MEtNS HETwL'EN THt MFrt ANU EPA LAB. (MFH-EPA/EPA »100).
THt COMMENT'S PtrtNNtNT TO TnLSt TtSfb AK£ LOCATED IN THE LAST TABLE OF THIS APPENOIX.
-------
l_Ail CONGELATION SUMMAKY - TEST UATfi
HKUCESSEOJ APR «t 1981
,
ATL-TRC OHIO
TE
7-80
7-BO
7-BO
7-80
7-ttO
7-faO
TESTNO
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
• TYPE
FTPH
FTPH
FTUH
F TPrt
FT*H
FT^M
hC
4VB
0.537
0.59*4
0.57/
0.53J
0.531
VtHI \
CO
3.6V
3.B2
J.94
4.02
3.90
J.89
/WWObIN-60 VIN: 53A 0010 «93
NOX
0.61
0.56
0.53
0.52
0.56
0.53
C02
333.
329.
327.
32t>.
J25.
FE DHIVEH
26.1
26.3
26.5
26.5
2(3.4
26.6
1
1
1
1
. 1
1
OYNO
C
C
C
c .
c
c
DOOM
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
IMP BOKO
0.0 29.09
0.0 29.fe7
0.0 29/01
U.O 28. V9
0.0 2b.97
0.0 28.94
INEWTIA WT: 2250 ACTUAL HP: 7.3
HUM
65.90
64.51
64.74
65.21
65.21
65. 9y
NXFC DbL HSL TLOSS
0.96
0.95
0.95
0.96
0.96
0.96
C — — < (,/M 1 ) —— J
(IN-HG)(GRAINS
/LB)
M£flN
STANOAWO UEV.
c. v. t
U1FF. *
3.«B 0.55 32B. 26.^
0.111 .033 3. 0.2
2.4 6.0 O.h 0.7
16. 9. 5. ->3.
29.01 65.24 0.96
0.051 O.bBl .003
0.2 0.9 0.3
-1. 38. 8.
TE TESTr.O TtHE L)r.\0 SHE
7-nn
/-dO
/-bO
/-bO
'-BO
V-bO
U
-------
LAU CORRELATION SUMMARY - TEST OftT»
PROCESSED! AP« 0, 1981
: VOLKSWAGEN-SET 3
ATE
ld-80
18-80
18-80
18-80
18-80
18-80
TESTNO
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
TYPE HC
FT'-'H- 0 .4{5b
FTPH 0.5*0
FT^-H 0.51 7
FTJrt 0.518
F T^H 0.51B
FT'-^H 0.525
1 <-.-.
VtH: VWWOBIN-UU
CO
3.73
J.B5
J.B<*
3.86
J.91
NOX
0,49
0,47
0.46
0,<*6
0. 294, 354. 2B9, 29.o 2<»,5 29.9
0.5J7 3.59 4.01
O.r>j7 3.6i; 4.07
O.S59 3.5« 4.18
0.520 0.363 3.63 4.26 3.81 0.5J 0.3U 0.59 2*4. 341. 291, 30.4 25.4 29.7
(ALL G/Mlj i<—(HPG) >l
P3
O
MEAN
STANDAHO OEV.
C . V . '*
DIFF. *
0,519 6.54^ 3.SH <*.07 3.69 0.5« 0.33 0.62 292. 353. 291, 29.7 2<».6 29.8
0.012 0.023 O.Olv 0.04 0.13 0.09 0.05 0.02 O.U2 5. 6. 3, 0.4 0.4 0.3
^.6 4.<« J.t 1.1 3.1 2.5 7.B 5.4 3.9 1.6 1,8 0.9 1.4 1.7 0.9
U. 24. 19. 13. 17. 15. -17. -5. -tJ. 0. 4. 1, -1. -4. -2.
C.V.% IS THE COFFFlCItoT 0^ VARIATION.(SfU. UEV./MEAN »100).
OIFF. % IS THE OlFfEKtNCt <>F THt MEAfJb Htr*tEN THE MFH AND EPA LAB. (MFH-EPA/EPA «100).
NOTE: THE COMMENTS PtKTlNENT TO TMtSE TESTS AKE LUCATtO IN THE LAST TABLE OF THIS APPENuU.
-------
CORRELATION SUMMARY - TEST DATA
PKUCESSEDJ APR
i9«i
,
Jt VWOA
JATE
20-ao
-20-00
TESTNO
1401-
1402
1403
VLH» \
TYPE HC co
/wwOHlu-HO VINt 53A 0010 093 lN£rt
NOX
FTMH 0.45J 3.73 0.50
FT^rt 0.4bl J.62 0.49
FT^H 0.476 J.76 0.51
C02
329.
326.
324.
FE
DRIVEN
26.4 1
26.6 1
26.7 1
f.MMi;i
OYNO
1
1
1
DOOM
0.0
0.0
0.0
IHP 8ARO
4.0 29.08
4.8 .2^07
1 Ihl»HKl
HUM
47.06
54.21
S4.21
(CHAINS
TIA «/Tl 2250 ACTUAL MfM 7.3
NXFC
0.«8
0.91
0,91
DBL HSL TLOSS
1 <•.. (nUAM't »— ••> I
/LH)
STANDARD OEV.
C.V.V
OIFF. *
0.460 3.70 O.SO J26. 26.6
.Ul3-y 0.0/3 .010 3. 0.2
J.C 2.0 2.0 0.* 0.*
7. 11. -2. 4. -4.
29.07 51.B3 0.90
0.0 <+. 1 Ib .016
0.0 7.9 1.7
-1. 10. 2.
BAG DATA
)are
* 4.w
. :* 5 •
0
0
'd
0
? j
,41fr II.49B
.4'ib 0.305
.401 0.<*99
,ut*t* 0.501
.014 O.uO'*
3.2 0.4
7. V.
CO
3.71
3.4V
3.52
3.5/
0.12
3.J
13.
2
3.B2
3.76
J.9B
3,85
0.11
2.9
10.
3
3.56
3.47
J.56
tLL G
3.53
0.05
1.5
10.
3.S6 O.b9 0.34 0.5t> 3U3. 356. 29B. 28.6 24.4 29,0
3.47 0.6b 0.33 0.6b 300. 353. 295. 28.9 24.6 29.3
J.b6 O.b« 0.3S O.b7 29H. 352. 293. 29.1 24.7 29.5
G/MI) I <--(Mpr>) — -> I
3.53 0.67 0.34 0.67 300. 35«», 295. 28.9 24.6 29.3
0.02 0.01 0.01 3. 2. 3. 0.3 0.2 0.3
3.1 2.V l.b O.M 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.6 0.9
-3. -1. -0. 3. S. 3. -3. -4. -3.
H
O
C.V.% IS THE CUEFFICltfif OF Va*IATION.(STu. DEV./MEAN »100).
OIFF. * IS THE DIFFtrttNCt. OF THE HtANS HtTrfEEN THE MFH ANO EPA LAB.
-------
CUMULATION
- COMMENTS
VIN b3A 0010 893
INERTIA WT 2350 ACTUAL HP 7.3
68V1
t.893
6894
6H95
6896
WNS: 1 = 11.6 3=ll.*»
Isl77
: VOLKSWAGEN 35bOM6WlNt: KO.TOLtt)0 OH<»360V H.U^LCT (*19) 383-0210
: 1 = 11.5 <;=n.b
1=1 h3 . •
B: VOLKSWAGhN 356UMA*INt WU . TULf I'O .OH'«3609 M.u^LET C» 1 9) 382-021 0
ASTUOWNS: l = n.& ^=ii.o
H.-JUE: 1 = 179
n: VoLKSWAf.EN 3560Mft«lNt >UN''>KlfJt: HU.rULEDO
ASTOO-mS: 1 = 11.6 i?=li.D
M-rjUh. « 1 = 1 Vv
o: VUL"SwAC,tN 3li6UwARlNt ^
AsTuO«','S: 1 = 11.5 ^=11.6)
(<»i9) 362-0210
«<• 19) J62-U210
(fiIKSEN
NS: 1=1^.0 ?=ll.a
rit
d:iOLLEY CAHE3URETO« 1 1 vabt AST VM ILE RD . XAKRE.N « MKH090 .DALE HENDRIKSEN
: 1 = 12. u 2 = 11. I
1 = 181
CiHdU^ETOK H >>DStAsI9MILE PU, ,-/A«HtN ,MI
^
>
lOa
10S
103
H>6
10*
10t>
201
201
201
202
2d2
202
203
20 J
203
20<»
20S
20S
20S
20o
20(3
301
301
301
302
302
302
30J
-------
•U£: I
KOHO CORKtL.ENG.l'JBbbwEbT OUTEH
TUOHNS1 1 = 12.0 2«11.V
•UE: 1 = 183
FOHO COaWEL.ENG.lVbbStaEST OUTEH
.TUOwNbJ 1 = 11.9 2=11. *
•U£! 1=183
FORD CORHEL.ENG.lVttbtawibT OUTF.H
•TUO-NS: 1 = 11. B 2=11. V
>UE: 1 = 1*4
FOHO CORBEL. £NG.l9dbbt*E:>T OUTEK
•TOOWNSJ 1=11.6 UE: l=lbO
AMC EMISSION LAR. l4<;b(iHLYHUUTM
.TUUWNS: 1=11.6 2=11. tt
• U£: 1 = 18<*
AHC EMISSION LAR. 14 «i
DK.OEAHhUri_rMOUTH WD.OET«niT
.TUOWNS: 1=12. o 2=11. v
jut: 1
. V
.LElMENOECnEK
• TUOWNS:
= 11.9 2=li.V
= li»7
PKOV.G0.37oubUUlM
: 1=1 l.H 2=Jl.b
;'Jt : 1 = 185
: 1 = 11.7 2=11.7
H(OM«iKlNt KiJ.roLfc.DO
(UUwNS: 1=11. b 2=12.1
•Ut : l = lHi,
VOLKSWAGEN 3b60MA«lNt HO.TULtUO
TOOWNS! 1=11.5 2=11,7
£0
^ I >.n 1 1 ft EO MiKVlLLE3J3 <*75K6bl
l8 EO MAHVILLE313 <»758bbl
1 ti EO Mft^V ILLE313 4758t>51
J8 EU MflKVlLLE313 4758b51
(«• 1 V ) 4M2-03 1 0
(41V) 3ti?-021 0
H.O-'LET («• 1 3tt2-02 1 0
(« I V;
303
303
30<»
304
30b
30b"
JOS
306
joft
506
fyl
401
<»02
40J
403
40<»
<«06
406
bol
bOi
b02
503
buJ
5'J5
bOb
5ub
SOb
506
506
601
bO I
b03
603
603
60«
604
605
-------
TORQUE:
i«i«2
60S
MU.TULEOO
3B2-0210
I'OKOUEJ l
^Ab: VOLKSWAGEN 3560MARlNt WU.TULtfM) OH436U9 H.OHLtT C419J 382-0210
;OASTUOrfN$: 1=10.7 2=lU.d
TUKOUE: i=ieo
^ABtFtAT 15<»01CENTURY UH.UEAHbUkN Mi<»ai26 C/i^LO CUCHl 313 336-3515
"OASTUUWNS: 1 = 11.0 2=11, <»
TOKuUE: 1 = 1*0
li><.OiC£NTUHY Ufc.UFAHBOKN MUH126 CA*LO CUCMl 313 336-3515
: 1=11.2 2=10. v
1 = 181
.AbiFlAT 15401CENTUBY OH.UtAWHUHN MI481?o CikLU CUCMl 313 336-3515
: 1=11.5 2=11.3
CUCHl 313 336-3515
MI<.H126 Cfl-'LO CuChl 313 336-3515
IB^OlCENTUPy UH.uCAknOKN Ml<»ttl2ti C'KUU C'JCHl J13 336-3515
;OASTUOWNS: 1=12.0 2=11. a
runout: 1=1 7«
: 1=11.5 2=il.6
i'OKijut': 1 = 1 us
,Ati:FlAT Ib^OiCfcNTURr U
l = in.H 2=11.'*
,A«:t!£NDU
;OASTUUWNS: 1 = 11. a ^=n.^
1 = 12.3 tslt.<*
1=170
,Ac5:bENDIX COKP.^OOw MA^Lt
S'.' 1 = 12. b 2=1
7') 6
706
«Vl
801
»02
aoj
OK 3
HO 3
(313) 362-1800
,Ml<.nn<«t4 *l;* MaTTlCt (313) 362-lbOO
F.Ki MATT ICE 362-1800
E.M MATTICE (313) 362-1800
tU MATTICe (313) 362-1800
t'N MiTTICE (313) 362-ltsOO
JOHN SUNNE (313)399-9600
JOHN SUNNE (313)399-9600 902
8 -I 3
ti I'l '>
vol
901
Vti 1
9u.5
Vl><4
90-
90-*
90S
(313)39^-9000 90T
jOnN
JOHN SUNNE (313)399-9600 906
1001
2
O
-------
.
(419) 470-745J
-•DUE: I
::AMC-JEEP V»0 N COVE. cJCVU TUUhOO OH
1 = 1 us
:AMC-JELP 940 N COVE. bLVU TOLEDO OM43657 UAN WETS (419) 470-7453
1 = 11.6 2=11.0
::AMC-JEtP 9<»0 N COVt oLVU TULtOO OH<*3657 "JAN KEIS J4lV) 470-7453
':STUUWNS» 1 = 11.5 2=ll.i>
::AMU-JEEP 9<.r> N
•SlOUWNSS l=ll.y
;OUE:
;:HONnA MOTO>< CO
iSTUowNS: 1 = 11.9
,'t*TY OH -.JJW MH.OALLOC.LY (513) t>66-<»351
: 1 = 11.3 2 = 11. b
1 = 187
PO RvJ*<^>-^ LA^T LlbfeHTV OH <»J31Si MH..OtLLUGLY (51 3) b66-«»351
'ffb: 1 = 11. <* 2 = 11. b
./Uc. : ! = !*•<*
:A!L HO rfOXi'h y t'ST LIot*TY OH <«J31v MK.f.tLLOGLY (51 J) b66-<*351
STOUV.NS: 1 = 1). b 2 = 11. b
..ut : 1 = 1 h^
:Ari_ HO KOA/^H9 t.'.'r.r Licit* FT OH <«JJlv M4.t,.-.LLi"iLY (bl J) 6b6-«»351
: 1 = 11. i
:VULKbWAGtN 3
STOO-MS:' 1 = 1 1 .
out: '
: VOLKSWAGEN 356l)MAWjNt WU.TOLtOO OH43609 H.OKLET {419) 3tJ2-03lO
STUO*NS« 1=11. H 2=12.0
10.01
1U01
1002
1002
1002
100J
1003
100J
1000
1004
1005
! 11 01
llni
llol
1102
11 02
lloj
110J
110-j
llni
llf'5
1106
g
>
Q
rJ-t
-fl
z
llub
I2ul
1201
12ul
1202
1202
12n2
12fiJ
1203
1205
120-3
120*)
12 i»b
13ul
IJ'U
IJtil
1J02
1302
1J02
1303
1J03
1303
-------
«419) 362-0310
EQUIPMENT
3b60MARlNt WO.TOLLDO OH43t>09 H ..
1»IU7 ««li./
EQUIPMENT FftlLUHrT
«d:VOCKSt«Af.fcN 3560M4HINL HU.TULt'UO OH
------- |