Reprinted from Journal of the Air & Wast* Manag
                                                                    EPA/600/J-93/463

                                              olatJon, VW. 42, No. 10, Oetobtr 1982
                Measurements of VOCs from the TAMS Network
                Gary F. Evans and Thomas A. Lumpkln
                U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
                Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

                Deborah L Smith
                Battelle
                Columbus, Ohio

                Matthew C. Somervllle
                ManTech Environmental Technology, Inc.
                Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
Target volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were measured at • network of urban air
monitoring  locations In Boston, Chicago, Houston, and the Seatte/Taeoma area.
 Following a pilot-scale field eval

            n of available techniques for determining concen-
            nique based on evacuated stainless steel canisters
Jratlons of VOCs In ambient air
i/as selected to collect whole air samples. Twenty-four-hour Integrand samples were
collected every twelfth day at ten sites over a 2-year study period. Battelle Columbus
Laboratory (BCL) analyzed the samples for 25 target VOCs using cryogenic focusing,
gas chromatographto  separation and mass selective detection with flame tonbatton
detection as backup. Duplicate canister samplers were operated each sampling period
at one of the ten sites In the Toxic Air Monitoring System (TAMS) network to estimate
overall method precision. In addition, every 10th analysis was repeated by BCL to obtain
a  measure of analytical  precision. -Finally, each sampling period a dean evacuated
canister was sent to Research Triangle Park to be filled with an audit gas mixture of
known concentrations. The audit canisters were analyzed along with the  routine field
samples to estimate method accuracy. The target compounds found most  ubiquitously
were  benzene, toluene,  xylene and ethylbenzene. These aromatic compounds were
highly correlated and  proportionally related In a manner suggesting that the primary
contributors were mobile sources In an the urban locations studied. Annual median
concentrations for target compounds ranged from 0.1 to 4.0 part per bmion volume
(ppbv) range, while Individual 24-h concentrations occasionally reached as high as 20
ppbv.
In June 1984, a document entitled
"Strategy for Monitoring Ambient Air
Toxic Pollutants,"1 was issued by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) proposing a multi-year research
and development program in the area
of toxic air pollutant assessment. As
                                      part of the overall strategy, the docu-
                                      ment called for the development and
                                      operation of a pilot-scale monitoring
                                      network consisting of one air  toxics
                                      sampling site in each of three cities in
                                      the first year, with subsequent expan-
                                      sion to 10-15 sites possible in future
     Implications

     Title III of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendment! require! that ambient monitoring
     be conducted in urban areas for a broad range of hazardous air polhitantt,
     including volatile organic compounds. This paper describes  an approach to
     sampling and analysis for VOCs which was used successfully by U.S. EPA In a
     network application over a two-year period.  The data quality achieved is
     summarized, along with a discussion of observations from ten urban monitoring
     locations. The monitoring system, based on whole air collection in a stainless steel
     canister, generally performed well in the field and produced data of high quality.
October 1992
Volume 42, No. 10
                                                REPRODUCED 8Y:
                                                U.S.Dtptitnwnt of Comnwro*
                                                National Ttchnteat Information Sarvte*
                                                Springfield. Virginia 22161
                                                                            years.  EPA's Atmospheric Research
                                                                            and Exposure Assessment Laboratory
                                                                            in Research  Triangle Park,  North
                                                                            Carolina (AREAL/RTP) was given the
                                                                            responsibility for implementing  this
                                                                            pilot program, known as the Toxic Air
                                                                            Monitoring System (TAMS) network.
                                                                            The objectives established for this pro-
                                                                            gram  were to evaluate methods of
                                                                            sample collection and analysis for toxic
                                                                            air pollutants, begin to characterize
                                                                            ambient concentrations in selected ur-
                                                                            ban atmospheres, and transfer moni-
                                                                            toring  technology and results to re-
                                                                            gional offices, state and local agencies.
                                                          Experimental Methods

                                                            The TAMS monitoring program was
                                                          initiated in 1985 with the establish-
                                                          ment  of one  air monitoring  station
                                                          each in Boston, Chicago and Houston.
                                                          These three cities  were selected for
                                                          this program by the Office of Air Qual-
                                                          ity Planning and Standards (OAQPS)
                                                          from a List of urban areas with popula-
                                                          tions greaterthan one million persons.
                                                          An effort was made to include in the
                                                          study  a diversity of emission and cli-
                                                          mate types, while not duplicating air
                                                          toxics  research already underway by
                                                          other programs. The selection of spe-
                                                          cific monitoring locations within each
                                                          city was  made in consultation  with
                                                          OAQPS and the appropriate regional,
                                                          state and local authorities. Siting crite-
                                                          ria included population density, area
                                                          emission types and rates, site accessi-
                                                          bility,  electric power availability, and
                                                          site security. In most cases, an existing
                                                          state or local agency  monitoring sta-
                                                          tion was found to meet the require-
                                                          ments of the TAMS program. For each
                                                          site, a local person was recruit d, hired,
                                                          and trained specifically for tin opera-
                                                                            Copgnithtl992-Alr*WuttM«oi«niwntA*ni

-------
tion of the TAMS air toxics sampling
equipment.
  The  initial sampling methodology
employed for the collection of VOCo at
the TAMS sites consisted of a distrib-
uted air volume (DAY) sampling sys-
tem (four air volumes and a field blank
per sampling period) with  Tenax-GC
as the solid adsorbent. Twenty-four-
hour  integrated  samples  were col-
lected every sixth day. Identification
and quantitation of target compounds
was accomplished at AREAL./RTP by
using thermal desorption of the sam-
ple followed by gas chromatographic
separation and mass spectrometric
(GC/MS) analysis for 96 target com-
pounds. Sample validation  was based
on the degree of consistency in blank-
corrected concentration across the four
samples for each compound.
  In August 1986, a methods compari-
son study was begun at a second site
established in the Houston area. Hous-
ton Site #2 is  situated in suburban
Deer Park, about midway between the
Houston Ship Channel and the Bay-
port industrial complex.  For  a 10-
month study period, two polished stain-
less steel canister samples  were
collected concurrently with the DAV-
Tenax samples  and returned to RTF
for analysis. A comparative analysis of
the results2 demonstrated  that while
the two methods yielded substantially
equivalent  mean  concentrations,
method precision was superior for the
canister collection technique. In light
of these results,  it  was decided  in
August 1987 to  replace the Tenax-
based samplers at existing TAMS sites
with  canister-based systems  and to
deploy the canister-based systems at
new TAMS sites called for in  fiscal
year 1988 (FY-88) program plans. Also,
because of the projected increase in
sample load, a  decision was made to
reduce the sampling frequency to ev-
ery twelfth day and to seek a contract
laboratory for provision of clean canis-
ters and analytical services to the ex-
panded network.

          Reid Operations

  During FY-88,  the TAMS network
was expanded to include a total often
urban air monitoring stations. Three
                       sites were located in each of the origi-
                       nal cities: Boston, Chicago and Hous-
                       ton. In each city,  the first two sites
                       were selected to represent the primary
                       industrial sectors of the urban area,
                       and the third site was located in a
                       more residential area for purposes of
                       contrast. Midway  through the fiscal
                       year, a single station became opera-
                       tional in the Seattle/Tacoma metropol-
                       itan area. This site was located in an
                       industrial complex on land controlled
                       by the Port of Tacoma. Descriptive
                       information for each TAMS site ap-
                       pears in Table I.
                         The canister samplers deployed  in
                       the network were similar in design to
                       the K-type samplers built by EPA for
                       use in the Kanawha Valley Study,3 two
                       of which were used in the TAMS meth-
                       ods comparison study. Prior to deploy-
                       ment, the samplers were cleaned and
                       certified according to procedures which
                       have since  been codified  in Method
                       TO-14 of EPA's Compendium of Meth-
                       ods.4 It was decided to operate the
                       TAMS samplers in a passive (i.e., vacu-
                       um-filling) mode to eliminate the pump
                       as a potential source of sample contam-
                       ination, mechanical failure, or air leaks.
                         Every twelfth day, a whole-air sam-
                       ple was collected at each TAMS site in
                       a clean, evacuated canister with initial
                       vacuum equal to -30 in.  Hg. Sam-
                       pling commenced at 6 a.m. and contin-
                       ued for a 24-h period. Flow of air into
                       the canister was regulated by a mass
                       flow controller set to a rate of ~3.5
                       cc/min. A certified mass flow  meter
                       was used to verify correct sample flow
                       before and after each sample collection
                       period. If properly followed, this proce-
                       dure resulted  in a  sample under a
                       slight vacuum (~2-3 in. Hg.) at the
                       conclusion of the 24-h sampling cycle.
                       Beginning and ending sampling times,
                       canister pressures, and flow rates were
                       recorded by the field operator.

                               Laboratory Operations

                         All canister samples collected at the
                       TAMS sites in FY-88 and FY-89 were
                       prepared and analyzed by Battelle Co-
                       lumbus Laboratory (BCD. The cryo-
                       genic GC/MSD system used to analyze
                       these  samples was  identical to the
                       system that had been used at AREAL/
Table I.  Location of TAMS monitoring stations.
     City
No.
Location
Classification
Code
Boston


Chicago


Houston


Tacoma
1
2
3
!•
2
3
1
2
3
1
1 Summit Dr
115 Southampton St
Orchard & Common St
727 E. lllthSt
7800 W 65th St
O'Hare Internationl
1262 Mae Drive
1050 W Pasadena Dr
4510 Aldine Mail Rd
2301 Alexander Ave
Industrial
Industrial
Residential
Industrial
Industrial
Airport Property
Industrial
Industrial
Residential
Port/Industrial
BOSl
BOS2
BOSS
CHI1
CHI2
eras
HOU1
HOU2
HOU3
SEAT
RTP for processing earlier TAMS sam-
ples. Canisters were cleaned with a
vacuum and oven system4 and sent to
the field  sites in time for each sam-
pling  date. Returned canisters were
checked in and the final pressure was
recorded. Sample analysis was achieved
with a Hewlett-Packard (HP)  model
5880 A (level 4) GC equipped with a
flame ionization and a mass selective
detection system (HP 5970). A 50-m
by 0.32-mm-i.d., HP-1 fused-silica col-
umn was used to resolve  the  target
compounds. The column exit flow was
split by a low dead-volume tee (Alltech,
Inc.).  One-third of the flow was  di-
rected to the mass selective detector
(MSD); the remaining  flow passed
through the flame ionization detector
(FID).
  A Perma Pure dryer (model MD-125-
48F) with a tubular hygroscopic ion-
exchange membrane (Nafion) was used
to remove water vapor selectively from
the sampled gas stream. Use of the
drier permitted collection of larger vol-
umes  of sample air (350 cc), thereby
lowering  the limit of detection. The
MSD was operated in the selective ion
monitoring (SIM) mode  of operation
for canister analyses. In this mode, the
MSD monitored only preselected ions,
rather than scanning all masses contin-
uously between two mass limits. As a
result, increased sensitivity  and im-
proved quantitative analysis were
achieved.  For the canister samples,
two characteristic ions  were  moni-
tored  for each target compound and
quantitation was based upon peak ar-
eas. The  minimum quantitation limit
(MQL) used for all compounds was 0.1
part per billion by volume (ppbv).

          Quality Assurance

  In the field, duplicate canister sam-
plers were operated each  sampling pe-
riod  at Houston  Site #2 to obtain
information for estimating the overall
precision of the measurement system.
In the laboratory, one canister was
reanalyzed each sample period to pro-
vide information on analytical preci-
sion. During the second year of the
program, a clean evacuated canister
was sent each sampling period to EPA
to be  filled with a mixture of known
NlST-traceable concentrations  of
VOCs from an audit gas cylinder. The
canister was then returned to BCL for
analysis with the routine  field sam-
ples. These data were collected to ob-
tain estimates of analytical bias.

Results and Discussion

  Results by TAMS site  ranged from
73.9 to 97.5 percent data complete-
ness. These values were  computed as
the percentage of scheduled sampling
periods for which valid aerometric  re-
1320
                                                                      J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc.

-------
suits were actually obtained. Reasons
for missing samples included mechani-
cal or personnel problems in the field,
missed shipment dates and laboratory
malfunction. Overall, the results were
judged to be acceptable in light of the
original data quality objective (DQO)
for data completeness (i.e., a 75 per-
cent).
   In Figure 1, the percentage of TAMS
data reported as discriminant values
(i.e., >0.10  ppbv) is shown by com-
pound averaged across all sites. Al-
though the target compound  list was
limited to VOCs which might be ex-
pected in urban air, many of the tar-
geted compounds were often not found
in measurable quantities at several of
the TAMS monitoring sites.  Further
quantitative analysis was therefore
limited to compounds found at concen-
trations above the MQL at least 75
percent of the time. Thirteen of the 26
target compounds met this criterion,
ten having 95 percent or more discrim-
inant values (see Figure 1).

Data Quality

   The replicate values provided by BCL
for every tenth sample were  used  to
calculate analytical precision estimates
for the 13 compounds of interest. Also,
the results from the duplicate sam-
plers operated at Houston site  #2 were
used to estimate overall method preci-
sion for each compound. These esti-
mates were computed in each case as
the  pooled standard  deviation  ex-
pressed as a percentage of the overall
mean for the paired data sets. Concen-
tration values below the MQL were set
to one-half that level for computation.
The resulting coefficients of variation
(%CVs) for replicates and duplicates
appear in Figure 2.
  The  13 compounds of interest fall
into three classifications, as shown in
Figure 2: freons, aromatics, and chlori-
nated alkanes. Although  the  freons
exhibit relatively high %CVs for dupli-
cate samples, the %CVs for replicate
analyses are quite comparable with
those for other compounds. This sug-
gests that problems may have been
encountered in obtaining representa-
tive ambient air samples for the fre-
ons. For example, the duplicate sam-
plers were located on the roof of an
air-conditioned trailer from which fre-
ons may have been emitted. Also, freon-
113 may have been used as a solvent to
clean components in the mass flow
controllers. Because of the relatively
high %CV for duplicates, freon data
were excluded from further analyses.
The other  compounds exhibited over-
all method precision in accordance with
the project DQOs (i.e., £ ±25 per-
cent). For carbon tetrachloride, the
%CV for replicate analyses exceeded
the %CV for duplicate samples. This
anomaly probably is due to the consis-
tently low  concentrations of carbon
tetrachloride reported (i.e., just slightly
above the quantitation limit).
  A comparison of the analytical re-
sults from  BCL  with  the known or
spike values from EPA for  audit gas
samples showed  that analytical bias
was generally within ±25 percent for
the  compounds in the mixture. An
explanation was found for each occa-
sion when  excursions beyond these
DQO bounds did occur.  Appropriate
corrective measures were then insti-
tuted, such as obtaining a calibration
gas of improved  purity for  one com-
pound and correcting the humidifica-
tion process for audit sample prepara-
tion at one point in the program.

          Monitoring Data

  The median and maximum 24-h
VOC concentration values for the two-
year study period are shown by site in
Table II. For the aromatic compounds,
concentration levels and their relation-
ships are very similar from site to site
and even across cities. The median
concentrations for chlorinated alkanes
are comparatively low  (i.e.,  less than
1.0 ppbv in most cases). However, max-
imum 24-h  values for the solvents
   Compound

              Benzene
       Benzyl Chloride
  Carbon Tetrachloride
        CNorobenzene
      3-Chtoropropene
     12-Otehloroetriane
      Dichloromethane
         Ethyl Benzene
       4-Ethyl Toluene
             Freon-11
             Freon-12
           Freon-113
       Methyl Chloride
              Styrene
     Tetrachtoroethene
              Toluene
 124-Trichlorobenzene
   111-Trlchloroethane
       TrJchloroethene
      Trichloromethane
124-Trimethylbenzene
135-Trimethylbenzene
         'Vinyl Chtorkte
          rmp-Xylene
             o-Xylene
Figure 1.  Percent values above quantitation limit.


October 1992      Volume 42, No. 10
                                     20
       30     40     50     60     70     80
      Percent  Values >  0.10 ppbv
               90    100    110
                                                                  1321

-------
  Compound

            Freon-11
            Freon-12
           Freon-113


             Benzene
              Toluene
          m+p-Xytene
             o-Xylene
         Ethylbenzene
124-Trimethylbenzene

       Methyl Chloride
      Dichloromethane
 Carbon Tetrachtoride
  111-Trichloroethane
 20
                                              30
                                      %CV(REPs)
        Co6ffictonts of vsrifltion toe rvpBcctes And dupOcAtu.
40     50     60

   %CV(DUPs)
70
80
90     100
dichloromethane and 1,1,1-trichloro-
ethane did occasionally approach or
even exceed 20 ppbv at industrial sites
in Houston and Tacoma.
  Review of data plots suggested that
some strong associations existed both
between and within sites. To explore
these relationships further, Pearson
product-moment correlations5 were
computed between sites within each
city. The highest  inter-site  correla-
tions were found to exist between Bos-
ton sites  1 and 2 and.Houston sites 1
and  3  for dichloromethane and the
aromatic compounds (r > 0.60 in all
cases). The lowest spatial correlations
(r < 0.33) were observed for carbon
tetrachloride. This  compound exhib-
ited little concentration range at most
of the sites, remaining very close to the
global background level of 0.12 ppbv.
Friedman's test5 (a nonparametric pro-
cedure) was computed by city to deter-
mine whether consistent differences
existed between sites within each city.
Generally, in the cases where signifi-
cant differences were found, the more
industrialized areas (sites #1 and #2)
                   exhibited higher concentrations than
                   the corresponding residential area (site
                   #3).
                     Correlations were also computed be-
                   tween  compounds  measured  at each
                   TAMS site to estimate the degree of
                   linear relationship between pollutants
                   at the  same location. This procedure
                   revealed that o-xylene, m+p-xylene,
                   and  ethylbenzene  were  highly (r >
                   0.90) and mutually correlated at every
                   TAMS site. Also, at most sites, ben-
                   zene and toluene were positively corre-
                   • lated with one another and with o-xy-
Table n. 24-H VOC median and maximum by rite (ppbv).
Compound
Benzene

Toluene

m + p-Xylene

o-Xylene

Ethylbenzene

Methyl Chloride

Dichloromethane

Carbon Tetrachloride

1 1 1-Trichloroethane

124-Tri-Methy! Benzene

Stat
Med
Max
Med
Max
Med
Max
Med
Max
Med
Max
Med
Max
Med
Max
Med
Max
Med
Max
Med
Max
BOS1
0.87
2.73
2.07
5.60
0.92
3.03
0.37
0.93
0.31
0.81
0.54
1.18
0.29
3.10
0.12
0.16
0.58
3.34
0.35
1.02
BOS2
1.15
1.95
3.01
5.48
1.42
2.96
0.53
1.12
0.44
0.84
057
1.01
0.39
3.89
0.13
0.17
0.71
2.72
0.59
1.43
BOS3
0.70
3.18
1.85
11.8
0.73
3.15
0.31
1.13
0.23
0.92
0.58
1.02
0.42
1.80
0.13
0.21
0.68
2.61
0.35
1.33
cmi
1.03
4.25
3.36
15.2
1.36
7.79
0.43
1.64
0.49
2.71
0.57
0.82
0.42
3.97
0.12
0.44
0.59
3.89
0.41
1.32
CH12
1.17
7.28
2.60
12.8
1.05
4.70
0.35
1.62
0.35
1.49
0.56
4.76
0.37
3.21
0.12
0.15
0.68
4.50
0.37
1.86
CHI3
0.86
2.02
1.83
9.49
0.81
2.41
0.40
1.16
0.26
0.81
0.58
1.34
0.38
3.40
0.13
0.19
0.66
1.84
0.36
0.87
HOU1
1.82
8.65
3.00
18.6
1.51
7.83
0.54
2.78
0.50
2.41
0.79
2.09
0.34
20.6
0.16
0.88
0.53
17.4
0.63
3.20
HOU2
1.09
6.51
1.77
9.86
0.87
3.24
0.34
1.01
0.29
1.06
0.72
2.42
0.31
5.71
0.13
1.14
0.41
7.08
0.37
1.19
HOU3
1.34
8.96
3.16
19.4
1.44
9.00
0.55
3.31
0.47
2.46
0.73
2.23
0.31
3.29
0.12
0.34
0.79
16.9
0.62
4.48
SEAT
0.95
8.21
2.22
16.3
1.16
8.33
0.44
3.00
0.37
2.30
0.56
2.99
0.35
14.1
0.12
0.17
0.53
13.7
0.46
2.82
1322
                                              J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc.

-------
           Table HI.  Ratios of toluene: benzene: xylene: ethylbenzene.
                                    City
              Site
  Boston     Chicago     Houston    Tacoma
1
2
3
7:3:4:1
7:3:4:1
8:3:5:1
7:2:4:1
7:3:4:1
7:3:5:1
6:4:4:1
6:4:4:1
7:3:4:1
6:3:4:1


lene, m+p-xylene, and ethylbenzene.
These strong linear as relations sug-
gest that a common source category is
predominantly responsible for the con-
centrations of aromatic compounds ob-
served at all the TAMS monitoring
locations. The  ratios  of  the median
concentrations for  aromatic  com-
pounds at the TAMS sites are shown
in Table III. These ratios, expressed as
toluene:  benzene: total xylene: ethyl-
benzene, are quite similar from site to
site and closely approximate published
ratios among these compounds for mo-
tor vehicle emissions (7:3:5:1).6 Clearly,
mobile sources  are most likely respon-
sible for the major portion of aromatic
VOC concentrations observed at these
sites.  Comparison of the TAMS data-
base with other results reported and
summarized in the literature''"10 show
that the VOC concentrations observed
at the TAMS locations are typical of
the atmospheric  levels of these com-
pounds generally found in U.S. urban
areas.

Conclusions

  EPA canister method TO-14 proved
fieldworthy in an urban network appli-
cation over a two-year period of opera-
tion. Coupled with GC/MSD analysis,
it produced data  of acceptable quality
in terms of completeness (90 percent
overall),  precision (within ±25%), and
accuracy (within ± 25%) for most VOCs
of interest. The 24-h ambient levels of
targeted VOCs ranged from less than
0.1 ppbv to slightly greater than 20
ppbv. Measured  concentrations were
comparable in  all urban  areas  moni-
tored, although the more heavily indus-
trialized areas tended to exhibit higher
                    concentrations than corresponding res-
                    idential areas. Toluene was the com-
                    pound generally found at highest con-
                    centrations,  with  individual  24-h
                    concentrations occasionally approach-
                    ing 20 ppbv. Mobile sources were most
                    likely  the  dominant contributors  of
                    the  aromatic compounds (i.e.,  ben-
                    zene, toluene, xylene, and ethylben-
                    zene) observed at all sites in each of
                    the four cities. Annual median concen-
                    trations for these compounds ranged
                    from 0.2 to 4.0 ppbv. Annual median
                    concentrations of chlorinated aliphatic
                    compounds were typically less than 1.0
                    ppbv, although individual 24-h concen-
                    trations ranged to 20 ppbv suggesting
                    the need for finer time-scale resolution
                    for applications where peak VOC con-
                    centrations are of interest.

                    Disclaimer

                      This paper has been reviewed in ac-
                    cordance with the U. S. Environmental
                    Protection Agency's peer and adminis-
                    trative review policies and approved
                    for presentation and publication. Men-
                    tion of trade names or commercial
                    products does not constitute endorse-
                    ment or recommendation for use.


                    References
                      1. Strategy far Monitoring Ambient Air
                        Toxic Pollutants, U.S. Environmental
                        Protection  Agency, Office of Air and
                        Radiation, Research Triangle Park, NC
                        (1984).
                      2. "FY-87 Annual Report on the Opera-
                        tion and Findings of TAMS," U.S.
                        Environmental Protection Agency, Of-
                        fice of Research and Development, Re-
                        search Triangle Park, NC (1987).
                      3. "Report on Air Monitoring in the
                        Kanawha Valley, West Virginia," U.S.
   Environmental Protection Agency, Of-
   fice of Research and Development, Re-
   search Triangle Park, NC (1987).
 4. "The Determination of Volatile  Or-
   ganic Compounds (VOCs) in Ambient
   Air Using Summa* Passivated Canis-
   ter Sampung and Gas Chromatographic
   Analysis," in Compendium MethodTO-
   14, U.S. Environmental Protection
   Agency Office of Research and Develop-
   ment, Research Triangle Park,  NC
   (1988).
 5. Cpnover, W. J. Practical Nonparamet-
   ric Statistics, John Wiley and Sons,
   New York, NY. (1980) p.  251 and pp.
   299-308.
 6. Scheff, P. A.; Wadden, R. A.; Bates, B.
   A.; Aronian, P. F. "Source fingerprints
   for receptor modeling," J. Air Waste
   Manage. Assoc. 39:469 (1989).
 7. Shah, J. J.; Singh, H. B. "Distribution
   of volatile organic chemicals in outdoor
   and indoor air," Environ Sci Technol.
   22:1381 (1988).
 8. National Volatile Organic Compounds
   Database Update, U.S. Environmental
   Protection Agency, Office of  Air and
   Radiation, Research Triangle Park, NC
   (1988).
 9. Edgerton, S. A; Holdren, M. W., Smith,
   D. L; Shah, J.J. "Inter-urban compar-
   ison of ambient volatile organic concen-
   trations  in U.S. cities," J. Air Waste
   Assoc. 39:729(1989).
10. Michael, L. C.; Pellazari, E. D.; Perritt,
   R. L.; Hartwell, T. D.; Westerdahl, D.;
   Nelson, W. C., "Comparison of indoor,
   backyard, and centralized air monitor-
   ing strategies for  assessing personal
   exposure to volatile organic com-
   pounds," Environ. Sci. Technol.  24:
   996, (1990).
     G. F. Evans and T. A. Lumpkin
   are senior environmental engineers
   with the U.S. EPA's Atmospheric
   Research and Exposure Assessment
   Laboratory  in Research Triangle
   Park, NC 27711. D.  Smith is a re-
   searcher with Battelle Memorial In-
   stitute in Columbus,  OH 43201. M.
   C. Somerville is  a senior scientist
   with ManTech Environmental Tech-
   nology, Inc. in Research Triangle
   Park, NC 27709.  This manuscript
   was submitted for peer r- -new on
   December 23, 1991. The revised
   manuscript was received on May 28,
   1992.
October 1992
Volume 42, No. 10
                               1323

-------