Hazard Ranking System Issue Analysis:
Targets Distance Limit for Surface Water
MITRE
-------
Hazard Ranking System Issue Analysis:
Targets Distance Limit for Surface Water
Carol K. Burger
Lawrence M. Kushner
August 1986
MTR-86W84
SPONSOR:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
CONTRACT NO.:
EPA-68-01-7054
The MITRE Corporation
Metrek Division
7525 Colshire Drive
McLean, Virginia 22102-3481
-------
Department Approval:,
MITRE Project Approval:
ii
-------
ABSTRACT
This report describes an analysis intended to show whether
available data for Superfund sites support the present distance
limits (3 miles in streams and rivers, or 1 mile in static water)
used for scoring the surface water pathway target population in the
Hazard Ranking System. The data, concentrations of released sub-
stances at various distances from their points of entry into surface
waters, were limited, by agreement with the sponsor, to what was
available in the National Priorities List (NPL) site files and
remedial investigation reports. There are insufficient data to allow
drawing any conclusions for the static water case. However, the
available data suggest that the 3-mile targets distance limit for
streams and rivers warrants upward modification, at least for those
cases in which no observed release has been shown. The data do not
permit making a recommendation as to what farther distance limit
should be used.
iii
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Issue Description 3
2.0 APPROACH 7
3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 13
4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 23
APPENDIX A: DATA SETS USED IN THE ANALYSIS 27
APPENDIX B: SURFACE WATER SAMPLING DATA 37
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table Number Page
3-1 Number of Data Sets 14-
3-2 Number of Useful Data Sets 16
3-3 Number (and Percent) of Stream Data Sets for 17
Which Return to Background is Indicated Within
3 Miles of the Point of Entry
A-l Stream Data Sets 28
A-2 Static Water Data Sets 35
B-l Surface Water Sampling Data, Streams 39
B-2 Surface Water Sampling Data, Static Waters 118
VII
-------
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act of 1980 (CERCIA) (PL 96-510) requires the President to
identify national priorities for remedial action among releases or
threatened releases of hazardous substances to the environment.
These releases are to be identified based on criteria promulgated in
the National Contingency Plan (NCP). On July 16, 1982, the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgated the Hazard Ranking
System (HRS) as Appendix A to the NCP (40 CFR 300; 47 FR 31180). The
HRS comprises the criteria required under CERCLA and is used by EPA
to estimate the relative potential hazard posed by releases or
threatened releases of hazardous substances.
The HRS is a means for applying uniform technical judgment
regarding the potential hazards presented by a release relative to
other releases. The HRS is used in identifying releases as national
priorities for further investigation and possible remedial action by
assigning numerical values (according to prescribed guidelines) to
factors that characterize the potential for any given release to
cause harm. The values are manipulated mathematically to yield a
single score that is designed to indicate the potential hazard posed
by each release relative to all other releases. This score is one of
-------
the criteria used by EPA in determining whether the release should be
placed on the National Priorities List (NPL).
During the original NCP rulemaking process and the subsequent
application of the HRS to specific releases, a number of technical
issues have been raised regarding the HRS. These issues concern the
desire for modifications to the HRS to further improve its capability
to estimate the relative potential hazard of releases. The issues
include:
• Review of other existing ranking systems suitable for
ranking hazardous waste sites for the NPL.
• Feasibility of considering ground water flow direction and
distance, as well as defining "aquifer of concern," in
determining potentially affected targets.
• Development of a human food chain exposure evaluation
methodology.
• Development of a potential for air release factor category
in the HRS air pathway.
• Review of the adequacy of the target distance specified in
the air pathway.
• Feasibility of considering the accumulation of hazardous
substances in indoor environments.
• Feasibility of developing factors to account for
environmental attenuation of hazardous substances in
ground and surface water.
• Feasibility of developing a more discriminating toxicity
factor.
• Refinement of the definition of "significance" as it
relates to observed releases.
• Suitability of the current HRS default value for an
unknown waste quantity.
-------
• Feasibility of determining and using hazardous substance
concentration data.
• Feasibility of evaluating waste quantity on a hazardous
constituent basis.
• Review of the adequacy of the target distance specified in
the surface water pathway.
• Development of a sensitive environment evaluation
methodology.
• Feasibility of revising the containment factors to
increase discrimination among facilities.
• Review of the potential for future changes in laboratory
detection limits to affect the types of sites considered
for the NPL.
Each technical issue is the subject of one or more separate but
related reports. These reports, although providing background,
analysis, conclusions and recommendations regarding the technical
issue, will not directly affect the HRS. Rather, these reports will
be used by an EPA working group that will assess and integrate the
results and prepare recommendations to EPA management regarding
future changes to the HRS. Any changes will then be proposed in
Federal notice and comment rulemaking as formal changes to the NCP.
The following section describes the specific issue that is the
subject of this report.
1.2 Issue Description
In applying the HRS, the potential threat to public health,
welfare, or the environment posed by a released hazardous substance
-------
is indicated by the potential for migration of the substance away
from a site by three possible routes --ground water, surface water,
and air. A migration score for each applicable route is calculated
by scoring the site with respect to a number of factors that
characterize (a) the hazardous substances at the site, (b) the
containment of the hazardous substances, (c) the potential for
migration of the hazardous substances from the site by that route,
and (d) the presence and proximity of targets (i.e., human
populations or sensitive ecological systems or environments).
In calculating an HRS surface water migration score, the target
population is defined in one of four ways, depending on whether the
migration path involves a stream (or river) or a static body of water
such as a lake, and whether or not an observed release has
occurred. When a release to a stream has been observed, the target
population is that population served by water intakes located
The HRS also takes into account the threat from direct contact
with the waste and from fire and explosion; however, only the
threat from migration away from the site is used for ranking the
sites for possible inclusion on the NPL.
A finding of observed release is based on the observation
(usually by measurement), at or downstream from the suspected point
of entry, of a concentration of hazardous substance (released from
a facility) that is significantly higher than its background con-
centration in the body of water concerned. The term significant
is used here in the sense of demonstrating that a release has
occurred--i.e., a difference between the observed and background
concentrations that is too large to be ascribed to experimental
error--and not in terms of potential effects.
-------
between the probable point of entry of hazardous substance into the
stream and a point 3 miles downstream from the farthest point of
observed contamination from the site. When observed release has not
been shown, the target population is that served by water intakes
within 3 miles downstream of the probable point of entry of
contaminants from the site. In the static water cases, the
definitions of target population are analogous to these, but the
distance limit is 1 mile. There is no published discussion by EPA of
the intended significance of targets distance limits. However, the
surface water targets scoring scheme implies that water from intakes
beyond the targets distance limits poses no incremental risk to users
that is attributable to the waste site.
In this study, available NPL site data have been reviewed to
determine whether they support the present HRS distance limits for
the surface water migration route or suggest that they should be
changed.
Section 2.0 describes the approach taken in this study. The
results of our analysis are given and discussed in Section 3.0.
Section 4.0 presents conclusions and recommendations.
-------
2.0 APPROACH
The approach taken was to examine available data, in the NPL
site files and site remedial investigation reports, on the
concentration of released substances in surface water at various
distances from the probable point of entry into the body of water.
The data were analyzed with a view to determining at what distances
from the probable point of entry the concentrations of released
substances returned to their background concentrations. A finding
that in substantially all cases the concentrations of released
substances had returned to their background concentrations within the
specified targets distance limits would be indicative of the adequacy
of those limits.
In the case of streams, data taken upstream of the suspected
point of entry were used to estimate the background concentration for
the substance. The downstream data were examined to see whether or
not the reported concentration of a released substance decreased over
distance to its background concentration and, if so, by what distance
from the point of entry the decrease to background had occurred. In
the case of static water, the background concentration was determined
from a sample sufficiently removed from the suspected point of entry
that it could be assumed to be unaffected by the plume. For both
streams and static waters, data on sediments, where available, were
analyzed separately from the data on water samples.
-------
As of January 1986, 402 sites in the NPL technical data base
that had undergone NPL quality assurance showed an observed release
to surface water. The site files for these 402 sites were reviewed
and 20 were found to contain concentration versus distance data for
released substances that could be evaluated in this analysis.
Remedial investigation reports provided similar data for 14 more of
the 402 sites. All told, the total of 34 sites provided 183 data
*ie
sets for some 43 different organic compounds, and 19 different
metal (or semi-metal) atom species in unspecified compounds or ionic
form. The latter are termed inorganics in this report.
For each site, the probable point of entry and the distances
from it to the locations at which samples were taken were either
given explicitly in the NPL site file or remedial investigation
report, or they were estimated for this analysis from accompanying
maps or diagrams. At a number of sites, more than one data set was
available for a substance, and it was necessary to decide which one
to use. The data set that seemed to be the most useful, taking into
account the number of samples, the distance over which they were
obtained, the internal consistency of the results, and the age of
A data set consists of measurements of the concentration of a
released substance at various migration distances from its suspected
point of entry into the body of water in question, as well as
measurements from which the background concentration could be
determined. All of the measurements in a data set were obtained
with samples indicated as having been taken during the same
sampling series.
-------
the data, was selected. Frequently, more than one upstream sample
was included in a data set. In such cases, the sample closest to the
point of entry was used to establish the background concentration.
If, at that distance, there was more than one sample, then the
average of their concentrations was used.
In analyzing the stream data, downstream distance was divided
into a series of intervals: 0 to 1/4 mile; >l/4 to 1/2 mile;
>l/2 to 1 mile; >1 to 2 miles; >2 to 3 miles; and so forth up to
>6 miles. A similar, although not identical, set of distance
intervals was used for static water. The concentration in each
distance interval was indicated as OB (over background on the basis
of a sample taken from within that distance interval), OB' (inferred
to be over background because a sample at a greater distance was OB),
RB (a sample from within that distance interval showed a return to
background), RB' (inferred to be RB because samples taken at closer
and farther distance intervals were RB), or I (indeterminate--it is
not possible to say from the available data whether the concentration
in that distance interval was OB or RB). If the farthest sample
taken showed return to background, the concentration was assumed to
be at or below background in all farther intervals, and the RB
designation was assigned for those intervals. The results of this
procedure are given in tabular form in Appendix A. The primary data,
showing the distances from the point of entry and the measured
-------
concentrations for all of the 34 sites and the substances that
exhibited an observed release at those sites, are given in
Appendix B. The individual data points are subject to the usual
sources of uncertainty associated with environmental measurements;
i.e., temporal variations at the sampling locations, lack of spatial
representativeness of the samples, loss of integrity of the samples
once obtained, and the difficulties inherent in the analytical
procedures themselves. It is also very likely that the data were not
obtained under comparable conditions or with uniform procedures from
site to site.
An alternative approach that might have been taken in this
analysis would have been to determine whether or not there was a
return to some safe level (e.g., the drinking water standard or the
ambient water quality criterion for the substance) within the
prescribed targets distance limits. It was decided not to pursue
this approach for the following reasons:
• What is at issue is the distance over which the site is
having an effect on the quality of the water. This
distance is determined by the concentration of the released
substance at the point of entry, the hydrology and
hydraulics of the body of water concerned, the molecular
diffusivity of the substance in water, adsorption,
sedimentation, resuspension, and certain of the substance's
chemical and physical properties which may or may not be
related to its inherent toxicity. The distance over which
the site is having an effect on the condition of the water
is, from a measurement standpoint, simply the distance over
which the concentration of the substance is above its
background level; the substance's drinking water standard
and/or water quality criterion are irrelevant to the
determination of that distance.
10
-------
• Neither current drinking water standards nor water quality
criteria have a readily apparent meaning with respect to
contaminated sediment.
It must be emphasized that the scope of this study was, by
agreement with the sponsor, very limited; i.e., to examine the data
available in the NPL site files and remedial investigation reports to
see if those data supported the use of the current targets distance
limits for the HRS surface water pathway. This has been an empirical
study, based on a limited amount of data. No other known body of
data, however, is likely to be more germane to assessing the adequacy
of the 1- and 3-mile targets distance limits at NPL sites. This is
not to say that other bodies of data in the growing literature on the
fate of pollutants in surface water may not be considerably more
useful for elucidating the underlying factors responsible for the
findings reported in this study. (See, for instance, the chapter,
Rivers and Streams, in "Water Quality Assessment: A Screening
Procedure for Toxic and Conventional Pollutants in Surface and Ground
Water — Part 1 (Revised-1985) ," EPA/600/6-85/002a, September, 1985.)
Sediment criteria are presently under development by EPA.
11
-------
3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Table 3-1 summarizes the number and types of data sets obtained
from the 34 sites. Clearly, far more data are available for streams
than for static waters. Also, the amount of data available for
inorganic substances exceeds that for the organics.
Actually, not all of these data sets contribute to answering the
question of whether the distances currently specified in the HRS for
estimating target populations for releases to surface waters are
justifiable. Only 16 of the 34 sites provided data sets sufficiently
extensive to enable one to draw a conclusion as to whether or not the
concentration of the released substance had returned to background
within the HRS limit of 3 miles for streams or 1 mile for static
water. This is probably due to the fact that the data were not
originally obtained for the purpose of determining the distance for
return to background. The distribution of the data sets used in the
&
analysis (i.e., "useful" data sets ), by number and type, is
A useful data set is one .from which a conclusive judgement can be
made whether or not the concentration of released substance returned
to its background concentration within the appropriate HRS distance
limit (3 miles for streams or 1 mile for static waters) from the
suspected point of entry. In terms of Table A-l, the conditions for
a useful data set are: RB in the >2 to 3 mile interval or in an
interval closer to the point of entry; or OB in the >3 to 4 mile
interval or in one farther from the point of entry. For Table A-2,
the conditions for a useful data set are: RB in the >3/4 to 1 mile
interval or in an interval closer to the point of entry; or OB in
the >1 to 1 1/2 mile interval or in one farther from the point of
entry. If a particular data set suggested that a second source
of the released substance further downstream, but within the targets
distance limit, might have been involved, that data set was not used
in the analysis.
13
-------
TABLE 3-1
NUMBER OF DATA SETS
TYPE
OF
SUBSTANCE
Organics
Inorganics
TOTALS
STREAMS
Water
39
47
86
Sediment
30
40
70
156
STATIC WATER
Water
1
3
4
Sediment
7
16
23
27
TOTALS
77
106
183
183
Metal atom species (e.g., lead, mercury, arsenic, etc.)
regardless of compound or ionic state.
14
-------
given in Table 3-2. From the table, it is evident that there is no
basis for making a judgment, in the case of static water, regarding
the question posed; there are no useful data sets for static water.
On the other hand, the number of useful data sets for streams is
sufficient to draw tentative conclusions.
Table 3-3 presents the data of greatest relevance to this
study. In it are given the numbers of stream data sets for which a
return to background was observed within the 3-mile limit from the
point of entry. The percentage of the useful data sets of that type
(taken from Table 3-2) that those numbers represent is given
parenthetically. The most significant result is that only 48 (69%)
of the 70 useful stream data sets show return to background within
the 3-mile limit. In cases in which adsorption onto suspended
particulate matter, followed by sedimentation, may have been an
important contributing factor to an observed return to background in
water, there is always the possibility of resuspension of the
particulate matter and an increase in the concentration of released
substance at some later time or further downstream. In such cases,
the observed return to background may not be truly reflective of the
distance over which the released substance is having an impact on the
stream; the distance may actually be greater. Thus, the finding that
as many as 68 percent of the water data sets showed return to
background within 3 miles may actually be higher than is correct. In
15
-------
TABLE 3-2
NUMBER OF USEFUL DATA SETS
TYPE
OF
SUBSTANCE
Organics
Inorganics
TOTALS
STREAMS
Water
16
15
31
Sediment
23
16
39
70
STATIC WATER
Water
0
0
0
Sediment
0
0
0
0
TOTALS
39
31
70
70
Metal atom species (e.g., lead, mercury, arsenic, etc.)
regardless of compound or ionic state.
A useful data set is one that contains sufficient data to
enable a conclusive judgment as to whether or not the
concentration of released substance had or had not returned to
its background concentration within the applicable HRS distance
limit (see footnote, page 13).
16
-------
TABLE 3-3
NUMBER (AND PERCENT*) OF STREAM DATA SETS FOR WHICH
RETURN TO BACKGROUND IS INDICATED WITHIN 3 MILES
OF THE POINT OF ENTRY
TYPE
OF
SUBSTANCE
Organics
Inorganics
TOTALS
WATER
16 (100%)
5 (33%)
21 (68%)
SEDIMENT
19 (83%)
8 (50%)
27 (69%)
TOTALS
35 (90%)
13 (42%)
48 (69%)
+Metal atom species (e.g., lead, mercury, arsenic, etc.)
regardless of compound or ionic state.
Percentages are with respect to the number of useful
data sets of that type as taken from Table 3-2.
17
-------
any event, the results indicate that upward modification of this
limit may warrant consideration.
However, the available data do not provide a strong basis for
suggesting what that new limit might be. Of the 22 useful stream
data sets that showed concentrations over background in distance
intervals beyond 3 miles from the point of entry, only 9 give data
showing at what farther distance return to background occurred. Five
such data sets are from the Iron Mountain Mine site and four from the
Moss American site. At the Moss American site, the four data sets
show RB occurring in the >4 to 5 mile interval. At the Iron Mountain
Mine site, the five data sets show RB at >6 miles; however, no
samples were taken in the intervals from 4 to 6 miles. Conversely,
of the 13 data sets that do not show return to background, only one
shows a measurement from beyond 4 miles; it was taken at >6 miles and
showed an over background concentration. These data are insufficient
as a basis for suggesting what target distance limit greater than 3
miles should be used.
The data also show essentially equal percentages of return to
background in both water and sediments, and a far greater percentage
return to background within 3 miles for the organics (90%) than for
the inorganics (42%). These results should not be accepted
uncritically. Although 16 sites provided a total of 70 useful data
sets, 48 of those data sets came from only 4 sites, and thus the data
18
-------
from just a few sites, at which an observed release was demonstrated
for a large number of substances, dominate. In addition, all of the
released substances from a given site tend to show similar behavior.
For instance, for the Iron Mountain Mine site, there are 10 data
sets, all for inorganic substances in water. None show return to
background within 3 miles. At the Whitehouse Oil Pits site, there
are 6 useful data sets, 5 for organics and 1 for inorganics. All
show return to background within 1/2 mile of the point of entry. At
the Fields Brook site, all of its 20 useful data sets (including both
organics and inorganics) show return to background within the 3-mile
limit. At the Coshoctin Landfill site, of its 11 useful data sets
for the same stream, the 3 for organics were obtained in surficial
water and all show return to background within 1/2 mile of the point
of entry, while the 8 for inoganics were sediment measurements and
are over background in the >3 to 4 mile interval. While the data are
by no means conclusive, they are certainly suggestive that
site-specific factors such as the quantity of discharge, the
concentration of released substance at the point of entry, the
background concentration, the amount and nature of suspended solids
and sediments in the stream, and the hydrologic characteristics of
the stream may be more important than the chemical and physical
properties of a released substance in determining the distance
required for its concentration to drop to its background level.
19
-------
Based on current models, one is inclined to believe that, in
general, dilution should be the most important effect in determining
the distance over which return to background is achieved in surficial
stream water. It would occur by mixing and by the increase of stream
volume that would result from the merging of tributaries along the
stream path. Adsorption, which would be the most likely chemical
attenuation mechanism for inorganics, would transfer dissolved
contaminant to an adsorbed condition on suspended solids; however,
this would not effectively remove the contaminant from the stream,
since the suspended solids would be transported along with the water,
and the adsorbed contaminant could be released by desorption under
the proper conditions. Were the suspended solids, with adsorbed
contaminant, to settle out, they could be resuspended farther
downstream. Similar considerations apply to the adsorption of
organics, as well. The other chemical reactions (or biochemical
reactions) that might be effective in attenuating organics concen-
trations in static waters usually do not, in flowing streams, have
sufficient time to occur to significant extent before the contaminant
JU
would be carried past the 3-mile target distance limit.
These conclusions, regarding the relative ineffectiveness of
adsorption or chemical or biochemical reactions in attenuating
the concentration of released substances in streams within 3 miles
of their point of entry, emerge from a companion HRS issue analysis
being done for EPA by MITRE ("Hazardous Ranking System Issue
Analysis: Alternative Methods for Ranking the Persistence of
Chemicals in Surface Water" by Ming Wang, in preparation).
20
-------
Although the pattern of behavior for surficial water and
sediments, in Table 3-3, is similar, one is unable to say whether the
considerations given above for the surficial water situation are
equally applicable to the sediment situation.
21
-------
4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The portion of the available data that is relevant to this
analysis is very limited, no doubt because the data were obtained for
different purposes than use in this analysis. In addition, it is
highly unlikely that the data were obtained under comparable
conditions, or with uniform procedures from site to site. Finally,
the portion of the data base that is useful is dominated by data from
just a few sites at which a large number of substances were
released. Thus, any conclusions that are drawn must be deemed
tentative and accepted with caution.
Nevertheless, the data in hand suggest that, in a significant
fraction of cases, the concentrations of substances released to
streams do not return to background levels within 3 miles of the
point of entry. This finding is not surprising in light of the
various studies in the literature showing high concentrations of
released metals, for instance, in rivers and streams over distances
of many kilometers. (See EPA/600/6-85/002a, cited previously,
pp. 467-480.) The implication of the finding is that the 3-mile
limit used for estimating the target populations for release to
streams may be too limited for those cases in which sampling has not
been undertaken downstream of the point of entry or where a release
is likely but not observed.
23
-------
The data are not good enough to justify detailed conclusions as
to differences between the organics and inorganics, or between
transport in sediments or in the water. Data that would suggest how
much farther than 3 miles from the point of entry or farthest point
of observed release the limit might be set are virtually
non-existent, although there are isolated data points showing
concentrations above background at distances greater than 6 miles
from the point of entry. It is not possible, on the basis of the
data in hand, to say anything about the adequacy of the 1-mile limit
in static water.
One must realize that if the targets distance limit were to be
increased in order to be more certain that the concentration of
released substance has decreased to its background concentration in
as many cases as possible, the number of sites at which the target
population will be overestimated could be expected to increase.
Thus, a possible result of extending the HRS distance limit is a
larger number of sites at which the target population score would be
higher than it should be.
If, as suggested by this analysis, the distance for a released
substance to return to background in a stream is site-specific, then
one might contemplate establishing the targets distance limit
individually for each site, and adjusting the target population
scoring scale accordingly. If dilution were to be shown to be the
24
-------
primary mechanism for return to background at a site, hydrologic data
(from the Geological Survey, for instance), coupled with the use of
simple stream models, might enable an estimate of the distance over
which the required degree of dilution for return to background should
occur. Alternatively, the distance for return to background to occur
could actually be determined by measurement.
It seems clear that further investigation of the adequacy of the
target population distance limits in both streams and static water is
warranted. However, additional analysis of currently available data
is not likely to be fruitful. Field and laboratory data developed
specifically for such a study, need to be obtained. Only when this
is done could one alter the present HRS surface water scoring scheme
with confidence that the resulting estimates of target population
would be improved.
25
-------
APPENDIX A
DATA SETS USED IN THE ANALYSIS
The two tables in this appendix were constructed from data given
in Appendix B. Table A-l presents the data sets for streams and
Table A-2 presents the data sets for static waters.
27
-------
N)
00
Site Name/Released
TABLE A-l
STREAM DATA SETS
(Based On Priaary Data Given In Appendix B)
Water
(Distance Interval. Miles)
Sediment
(Distance Interval. Miles)
Substances
+Re-Solve, Inc.
+Helen Kramer Landfill
Traiis-l ,2-DlcliloroelUene
2-Butanone
Xylenea
Bis( 2— chloroethyl) ether
laophorone
Cadmium
Cobalt
Copper
iron
Nickel
Silver
H&T Deliaa Landfill
Beryllium
Mercury
0-k
OB
OB'
OB'
OB
OB
OB
OR
> it-ij
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
OR
> ij-l >l-2 >2-3
OB I I
OB I I
> 3-4 >4-5 >5-6 >6 0-!(
I I I I
I I I I
OR*
OB
OB
OB
nn
>lj-lj
OR
nn*
O.R
OB
AD
>4-l >l-2 >2-3 >3-4 >4-5 >i-6 >6
on ».
DD — — ^
Note: Definitions of OB, OB', &B, RB' and I are to be found at the end of this table.
-------
TABLE A-l (Continued)
Site Name/Released
Substances
Water
(Distance Interval. Miles)
Sediment
(Distance Interval. Miles)
i-2 >2-3 >3-4 >4-5 >5-6 >6
1-2 >2-3 >3-4 >4-5 >5-6 >6
N>
VO
Ventro/Velsicol
Cadmium
Lead
Zinc
Arsenic
Mercury
General Motors - Central
Foundry Division
PCB OB
+Tybouts Corner Landfill
*l,2-Dichloroethane
Fluorotrichloromethane
NCR
Trichloroethene
*l,l-Dlchloro-2,2-bis
(p-chlorophenyl)ethane
Aberdeen Proving Ground
•White Phosphorous
+Moyers Landfill
•Copper
OBOB1IIII1I
RB RB ».
OB OB' OB RB
•••Taylor Borough
Iron OB
Manganese OB
Zinc OB
Whltnoyer Laboratories
Arsenic OB
OB
OB
OB
OB' OB' RB
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
1
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
RB
OB
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RB
OB
OB'
OB' OB
-------
TABLE A-l (Continued)
Site Name/Released
Substances
Water
(Distance Interval. Miles)
l-2 >2-3
>4-T~>5-6
Sediaent
(Distance Interval. Miles)
* > lfl >1~2 >2"3 >3~
~5 >5~6 >6
Rohn and Haas
Bls(2-chlorolsopropyl)
ether OB
•Lead
Chromium
Revere Chemical Co.
(East Tributary)
Bla(2-ethylhezyl)phtbalate OB
Beryllium
Chromium
Copper
Nickel
Lead
Zinc
(South Tributary)
AluMlnu*
Copper
Iron
Nickel
Lead
Manganese
Zinc
•Hfhltehouae Oil Pit*
•Chlordane
*l,l-Dlchloro-2.2-bl«
(p-chlorophenyl)e thane
*l-Chloro-2,2-bl«
(chlorophenyl)ethylene
*DDT
•PCB
•Iron
Magnealua
Zinc
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
RB
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
RB
RB
RB
RB
RB
RB
-------
TABLE A-l (Continued)
Site Name/Released
Water
(Distance Interval, Miles)
Sediment
(Distance Interval, Miles)
Substances
Jadco-Hughes
•Chromium
•Copper
•Lead
Sangamo Western
PCB
0-lt >!t-!4 >!5-l >l-2 >2-3 >3-4 >4-5 >5-6 >6 0-!t >%- !« »«-l >1~2 >2-3 >3-4 >4-5 >5-6 >b
n n , . _ . Bk
nil ..... ^
OB' OB OB' OB OB OB' OB' OB' R
Mldco II
Acetone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Phenol
+Arcanum Iron and Metal
to * Antimony
Lead
+Coshocton Landfill
(North Creek)
•Acetone
•Methylene chloride
•Xylene
•Chromium
•Barium
•Cobalt
•Iron
•Nickel
•Manganese
•Vanadium
•Arsenic
(West Creek)
•Acetone
OB
OB
OB
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RB
OB
OB
RB
RB
RB' RB'
RB' RB'
RB'
RB'
RB
RB
OB
OB
RB
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB1
OB'
OB'
OB1
OB'
OB'
OB'
OB'
OB'
OB'
OB'
OB'
OB'
OB'
OB'
OB'
OB'
OB'
OB'
OB'
OB'
OB'
OB'
OB1
OB'
OB'
OB1
OB1
OB'
OB'
OB'
OB'
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RB
-------
TABLE A-l (Continued)
it-ii >ii-i > 1-2 > 2-3 >3-« >4-5 >5-6 >6 0-it > it-4 >^-l > 1-2 >2-3 >3-4 >4-5 >5HT
•••Fields Brook
•Trlchloroethene OB OB OB OB RB *>
*l»1.2-Trlchloroethane OB OB 1 RB RB *•
•lil.2,2-Tetrachloroethane OB OB OB1 OB RB *>
•Tetrachloroethene OB OB OB1 RB RB *•
•Acetone OB OB I RB RB +
•Vinyl Chloride OB RB gj. RB
i«2-trans-Dlchloroethene OB OB' OB' RB RB k. OB OB OB' RB
•Heiathlepane OB 1 I RB
•1,2,4-Irlthlolane RB RBi RBt RB
•1,3,5-Trlchlorobenzene RB RB' RB' RB
•l,l'-0xyblsbenzene RB RBt RB« RB
RB RB' Rfl' RB
•Chlorobenrene KB
w •2-Chloro~2-butene RB
M •3-Chloro-2-methyl-l.
-Propane RB
•Hexadecane KB
IXfcf
•1,3,5-Cycloheptatrlene RB RB
RB
•Araenlc OB OB1 RB RB
Mercury OB OB OB OB
•Tnalllua KB
•Hlew Ly»e Landfill
Manganese OB 1 I 1 1 I j J {
Zinc OB I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I
Moss American
•Pyrene «,
Pluorene
•Blphenyl °?,
•Dlbenrofuran "°
•Phenanthrene „.,
•Fluoranthene °"
Aceoaphthene
-------
TABLE A-l (Continued)
Site Name/Released
Substances
Water
(Distance Interval, Miles)
Sediment
(Distance Interval. Miles)
l-2 >2-3 >3-4 >4-5 >5-6 >6
l-2 >2-3 >3-4 >4-5 >5-6 >6
CO
Sheboygan Harbor & River
PCB
Montana Pole and Treating Plant
Pentachlorophenol OB' OB'
Mayflower Mt. Tailings
Iron OB I
Manganese OB 1
+lron Mountain Mine
•Aluminum OB' OB1
Arsenic OB' OB'
Cadmium OB' OB'
•Chromium OB' OB'
*Cobalt OB' OB'
•Copper OB' OB'
Iron OB' OB'
•Lead OB' OB'
•Magnesium OB' OB'
•Manganese OB' OB'
Platinum OB' OB'
•Potassium OB' OB'
•Vanadium OB' OB'
•Zinc OB' OB1
Nickel OB I
Beryllium OB I
MGM Brakes
•PCB OB RB
OB
I
OB'
OB'
OB'
OB'
OB'
OB'
OB*
OB'
OB'
OB'
fin 1
UD
OB'
OB'
OB'
I
I
I
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
nn
UJJ
OB
OB
OB
I
I
I
OB'
I
I
OB'
OB'
OB1
I
OB'
OB'
OB'
OB1
OB'
OB'
1
I
I
OB
RB
I
OB
OB
OB
I
OB
OB
OB
n o
K.O
OB
OB
OB
I
I
I
I
RB'
I
I
I
I
I
OB'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RB'
I
I
I
I
I
OB'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RB
I
RB
RB
I
I
OB
1
RB
fc
^W
I
RB
RB
I
I
-k
OB
-------
TABLE A-l (Concluded)
Water
Sediment
Sacramento Army Depot
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Nickel
Zinc
-Western Processing
Tr Ichloroe thylene
•Isophorone
•Naphthalene
•2 ,4-Dlchlorophenol
•2 ,4-Dlmethylphenol
Cadmium
Zinc
v. Distance interval, niies;
OB'
OB'
OB'
OB'
OB'
OB RB to
OB RB to<
OB RB to
OB RB to
OB
OB
>w- k > u-1 >l-2 >2-3 >3-4 >4-5 >5-6 >6
•(•Data were obtained from a remedial investigation report.
•Useful data aet.
NOTE: OB - Over background by virtue of a measurement from a sample taken within that distance Interval.
OB' - Inferred to be over background because a measurement from a sample taken within a farther distance
Increment was over background.
RB - Returned to background by vlrture of a measurement from a sample taken within that distance interval.
RB' - Inferred to have returned to background because measurements from samples taken within closer and
farther distance Intervals showed a return to background.
I - Indeterminate — It Is not possible to say from the data whether the concentration In that distance
Interval had or had not returned to background.
After the last observed return to background, the concentration in all farther distance Increments was assumed to
be at or below background. This is Indicated by an arrow extending to the farthest distance interval.
-------
TABLE A-2
STATIC WATER DATA SETS
(Based On Prlnary Data Given In Appendix B)
01
Site Name/Released
Water
(Distance Interval. Miles)
SediBent
(Distance Interval. Miles)
Substances 0-ij > !j-lj > !j-J >{ -1 >!-.
•fHocoaonco Pond
AlualmiM
Arsenic
Barlua
Copper
Manganese
Nickel
Zinc
•Hle-Solve, Inc.
4-Brldgeport Rental and
Oil Services
Bls(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Aberdeen Proving Ground
1% >lif-2 >2-2Jj >2lf3 0-%
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB
> It-Is
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
>ji-|
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
>f-l >!-!!«
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I I
>m-2
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
>2-2!s
I
I
I
I
1
I
1
I
>2!j-3
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sangaao/Crab Orchard
PCB
Wyckoff Co. - Eagle Harbor
Benzo(a)pyrene
Napthalene
Benzo(a)anthracene
OB
OB
OB
OB
OB OB
OB
I
I
I
Note: Definitions of OB, OB', RB, RB' and I are to be found at the end of this table.
-------
TABLE A-2 (Concluded)
Site Name/Released
Substances
Water
(Distance Interval. Miles)
>>t-
^-2 >2-2%>2%-3
Sediment
(Distance Interval. Mllea)
>2-2%
NUWES Keyport
Aluminum OB I I I I * *
Arsenic OB I I I I I I
Chromium OB I I I I I I
Copper OB I I I I I I
Manganese Ob I I I I I I
Mercury OB I I I I I I
Nickel OB I I I I I I
Zinc OB I I I I I I
-HXata were obtained from a remedial investigation report.
NOTE: OB - Over background by virtue of a measurement from a sample taken within that distance Interval.
OB* - Inferred to be over background because a measurement from a sample taken within a farther distance
Increment was over background.
RB - Returned to background by vlrture of a measurement from a sample taken within that distance interval.
RB' - Inferred to have returned to background because measurements from samples taken within closer and
farther distance intervals showed a return to background.
I - Indeterminate — It is not possible to say from the data whether the concentration in that distance
Interval had or had not returned to background.
After the last observed return to background, the concentration In all farther distance Increments was assumed to
be at or below background. This is indicated by an arrow extending to the farthest distance interval.
-------
APPENDIX B
SURFACE WATER SAMPLING DATA
The data presented in this appendix were obtained from the NPL
site files and remedial investigation reports. They include, for
some sites, data for sediment samples as well as surficial water
samples. Table B-l presents the data sets for streams and Table B-2
presents the data sets for static water. The order of the sites in
Appendix B is the same as in Appendix A.
37
-------
Explanation of Terms Used in the Tables:
Site Name Name of NPL site.
Sample Series
At some sites, several series of sampling data
were obtained at different dates or from
separate streams. Two numbers are used in
identifying each series. The second number
gives the total number of data series for that
site; the first number identifies the data
series presented on that page.
Sampling Date Date when sampling run was conducted.
Stream/Static Water Surface water designation by type.
Sampling Point Identification of sampling location (as given in
the NPL site file or remedial investigation
report).
Distance Distance from the probable point of entry to the
sampling point. The distances were either given
explicitly in the NPL site file or remedial
investigation report, or they were estimated for
this analysis from available maps or diagrams.
Upstream/Downstream Refers to the locations of the sampling points
with reference to the probable point of entry.
Organic/Inorganic
Substances
Water/Sediment
Identification of substances as to their
chemical nature.
Names of substances detected in the surface
water at the particular site.
Identification of the medium from which the
sample was taken.
38
-------
TABLE B-l
SURFACE WATER SAMPLING DATA, STREAMS
Site Name: Re-Solve, Inc.
Sample Series: 1/1
Sampling Date: 11/13/84
Stream
Upstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
PCS
Distance
Sediment
23
10'
0.2 ppm
Downstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
22
21
Distance
166.63'
299.93'
PCB
Sediment
2.0 ppm
2.7 ppm
39
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Helen Kramer Landfill
Sample Series: 1/3
Sampling Date: 08/27/84
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
C7
C6
C5
C4
Distance
1420'
1480'
1100'
10'
Cadmium
Sediment
260 ug/kg
58 ug/kg
200 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
Cobalt
Sediment
1300 ug/kg
1350 ug/kg
1200 ug/kg
1050 ug/kg
Copper
Sediment
580 ug/kg
1130 ug/kg
330 ug/kg
430 ug/kg
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling Cadmium Cobalt Copper
Points Distance Sediment Sediment Sediment
C3 1100' 600 ug/kg 22800 ug/kg 1180 ug/kg
C2 1600' 750 ug/kg 1900 ug/kg 1630 ug/kg
Cl 3200'* 1500 ug/kg 7800 ug/kg 19400 ug/kg
*Distance estimated.
40
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Helen Kramer Landfill
Sample Series: 1/3
Sampling Date: 08/27/84
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
C7
C6
C5
C4
Distance
1420'
1480'
1100'
10'
Manganese
Sediment
17300 ug/kg
32800 ug/kg
14500 ug/kg
13100 ug/kg
Nickel
Sediment
1750 ug/kg
1450 ug/kg
1000 ug/kg
1350 ug/kg
Silver
Sediment
150 ug/kg
150 ug/kg
ND
ND
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Manganese
Nickel
Silver
Distance
Sediment
Sediment
Sediment
C3
C2
Cl
1100'
1600'
3200'*
63400 ug/kg
18600 ug/kg
12300 ug/kg
7000 ug/kg
10100 ug/kg
73000 ug/kg
1150 ug/kg
ND
150 ug/kg
*Distance estimated.
ND - Not detected.
41
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Helen Kramer Landfill
Sample Series: 2/3
Sampling Date: 08/27/84
Stream
Upstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
C7
C6
C5
C4
Distance
1420'
1480'
1100'
10'
1,1-Dichloro-
ethane
Water
ND
ND
ND
ND
Acetone
Water
ND
ND
ND
ND
trans-1,2-
Dichloro-
ethane
Water
ND
ND
ND
ND
Downstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
1,1-Dichloro-
ethane
Acetone
Distance
Water
Water
trans-1,2-
Dichloro-
ethane
Water
C2
Cl
1600'
3200'*
1.6 ug/1
2.3 ug/1
610 ug/1
510 ug/1
9.2 ug/1
15.0 ug/1
*Distance estimated.
ND - Not detected.
42
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Helen Kramer Landfill
Sample Series: 2/3
Sampling Date: 08/27/84
Stream
Upst ream/Organics
Sampling
Points
1,2-Dichloro-
ethane
1,1,1-Tri-
chloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetra-
chloroethane
Distance
Water
Water
Water
C7
C6
C5
C4
1420'
1480'
1100'
10'
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Downstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
1,2-Dichloro-
ethane
1,1,1-Tri-
chloroethane
1,1,2,2-Tetra-
chloroethane
Distance
Water
Water
Water
C2
Cl
1600'
3200'*
52 ug/1
67 ug/1
2.2 ug/1
3.3 ug/1
3.9 ug/1
4.3 ug/1
*Distance estimated.
ND - Not detected.
43
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Helen Kramer Landfill
Sample Series: 2/3
Sampling Date: 08/27/84
Stream
Sampling
Points
C7
C6
C5
C4
Upstream/Organics
Trichloro- 4-Methyl-
ethane 2-Pentanone
Distance
1420'
1480'
1100'
10'
Water
ND
ND
ND
ND
Water
ND
ND
ND
M
2-Butanone
Water
ND
ND
ND
ND
Downstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
C2
Cl
Trichloro- 4-Methyl-
ethane 2-Pentanone
Distance
1600'
3200'*
Water
5.0 ug/1
7.1 ug/1
Water
130 ug/1
240 ug/1
2-Butanone
Water
82 ug/1
180 ug/1
*Distance estimated.
M - Data point deemed unreliable during quality assurance.
ND - Not detected.
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Helen Kramer Landfill
Sample Series: 2/3
Sampling Date: 08/27/84
Stream
Upstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
C7
C6
C5
C4
Distance
1420'
1480'
1100'
10'
Ethylbenzene
Water
ND
ND
ND
ND
Xylenes
(Total)
Water
ND
ND
ND
ND
Bis( 2-chloroethyl)-
ether
Water
ND
ND
ND
ND
Downstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
Ethylbenzene
Xylenes Bis(2-chloroethyl)-
(Total) ether
Distance
Water
Water
Water
C2
Cl
1600'
3200'*
4.4 ug/1
11.0 ug/1
96 ug/1
11 ug/1
69 ug/1
74 ug/1
*Distance estimated.
ND - Not detected.
45
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Helen Kramer Landfill
Sample Series: 2/3
Sampling Date: 08/27/84
Stream
Upst ream/Organics
Sampling Isophorone
Points Distance Water
C7 1420' ND
C6 1480' ND
C5 1100• ND
C4 10' ND
Downst ream/Organics
Sampling
Points
C3
C2
Cl
Distance
1100'
1600'
3200'*
Isophorone
Water
32 ug/1
27 ug/1
30 ug/1
*Distance estimated.
ND - Not detected.
46
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Helen Kramer Landfill
Sample Series: 3/3
Sampling Date: 08/27/84
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
C7
C6
C5
Distance
1420'
1480'
1100'
Iron
Water
2035 ug/1
M
2260 ug/1
Manganese
Water
60 ug/1
62 ug/1
64 ug/1
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Iron
Distance
Water
Manganese
Water
C4
C3
C2
Cl
10'
1100'
1600'
3200'*
4420 ug/1
7650 ug/1
6470 ug/1
7820 ug/1
175 ug/1
212 ug/1
242 ug/1
230 ug/1
*Distance estimated.
M - Data point deemed unreliable during quality assurance.
47
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: M&T Delisa Landfill
Sample Series: 1/3
Sampling Date: 06/80
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Upstream
Distance
2496'
Copper
Sediment
1000 ug/1
Arsenic
Sediment
3300 ug/1
Mercury
Sediment
230 ug/1
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Copper
Arsenic
Distance
Mercury
Sediment
Sediment
Sediment
Downstream
320'
4600 ug/1
9000 ug/1
690 ug/1
48
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: M&T Delisa Landfill
Sample Series: 2/3
Sampling Date: 06/77
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Beryllium
Distance
Sediment
Thallium
Sediment
3306
1280'
0.1 ug/1
2.0 ug/1
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
3307
3301
3308
Distance
192'
1440'
2912'
Beryllium
Sediment
0.55 ug/1
18.00 ug/1
.55 ug/1
Thallium
Sediment
4.0 ug/1
5.0 ug/1
2.0 ug/1
49
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: M&T Delisa Landfill
Sample Series: 3/3
Sampling Date: 06/77
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
3306
Distance
1280'
Arsenic
Sediment
.40 ug/1
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling Arsenic
Points Distance Sediment
3307 192' .05 ug/1
3301 1440' 1.10 ug/1
3308 2912' .05 ug/1
50
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Ventro/Velsicol
Sample Series: 1/3
Sampling Date: 06/77
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling Cadmium
Points Distance Sediment
8 300'(3-6")* 2.1 mg/kg
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling Cadmium
Points Distance Sediment
150'(3-6")* 6.6 mg/kg
*Numbers in parentheses indicate the depth (when given) at which the
sample was taken.
51
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Ventro/Velsicol
Sample Series: 2/3
Sampling Date: 06/77
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
8
Distance
300 '( 6-9")*
Lead
Sediment
2.3 mg/kg
Zinc
Sediment
167 mg/kg
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Lead
Distance
Sediment
Zinc
Sediment
150'(6-9")*
18 mg/kg
683 mg/kg
*Numbers in parentheses indicate the depth (when given) at which the
sample was taken.
52
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Ventro/Velsicol
Sample Series: 3/3
Sampling Date: 06/77
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
8
Distance
300 '(9-16")*
Arsenic
Sediment
6 mg/kg
Mercury
Sediment
14.7 mg/kg
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Arsenic
Distance
Sediment
Mercury
Sediment
150'(9-12")*
11 mg/kg
23 mg/kg
*Numbers in parentheses indicate the depth (when given) at which the
sample was taken.
53
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: General Motors - Central Foundry Division
Sample Series: 1/2
Sampling Date: 09/14/82
Stream
Upstream/Organica
Sampling
Points
PCB
Distance
Sediment
Upstream No. 6
2500'
ND
Downstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
PCB
Distance
Sediment
Downstream
625'
9.3 mg/1
ND - Not detected.
54
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: General Motors - Central Foundry Division
Sample Series: 2/2
Sampling Date: 08/02/82
Stream
Upstream/Organics
Sampling PCS
Points Distance Sediment
Upstream No. 6 2640' 50 mg/1
Downstream/Organics
Sampling PCS
Points Distance Sediment
Downstream 625' 1500 mg/1
55
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Tybouts Corner Landfill Site
Sample Series: 1/1
Sampling Date: 01/21/84
Stream
Sampling
Points
005
Upstream/Organic s
1,2-Dichloro-
e thane
Distance Sediment
1,440' ND
Fluorotri-
chloromethane
Sediment
ND
Downstream/Organic s
Sampling
Points
013
015
Distance
120'
450'
1,2-Dichloro-
ethane
Sediment
17 ug/1
ND
Fluorotri-
chloromethane
Sediment
50 ug/1
LT
LT - Less than detection limit.
ND - Not detected.
56
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: NCR Corporation
Sample Series: 1/1
Sampling Date: 01/04/84
Stream (Tidal)
Upstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
Trichloroethane
l,l-Dichloro-2,2-bis-
(p-chlorophenyl)
ethane
Distance
Water
Water
Stream 1
Stream 2
Stream 3
1125'
600'
125'
3.6 ug/1
3.3 ug/1
2.8 ug/1
< 0.1 ug/1
5.3 ug/1
4.5 ug/1
Downstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
Stream 4
Stream 5
Stream 5a
Stream 6
Stream 7
Stream 8
Stream 9
Stream 10
Distance
10'
10'
10'
10'
250'
800'
1125'
1400'
Trichloroethane
Water
482.0 ug/1
25.3 ug/1
886.0 ug/1
1400.0 ug/1
61.5 ug/1
101.0 ug/1
78.4 ug/1
74.7 ug/1
l,l-Dichloro-2 ,2-bis-
( p-chlorophenyl)
ethane
Water
31.2 ug/1
1.0 ug/1
103.0 ug/1
26.8 ug/1
16.8 ug/1
2.6 ug/1
2.0 ug/1
1.9 ug/1
57
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Aberdeen Proving Ground (APG) - Edgewood Area
Sample Series: 1/2 Area: Canal Creek
Sampling Date: 02/18/77
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Distance
White
Phosphorous
Water
C53
422.4'
ND
Downstream /Inorganic s
Sampling
Points
C54
C55
C56
Distance
528'
2745. 61
5808'
White
Phosphorous
Water
2.12 ug/1
0.40 ug/1
ND
ND - Not detected.
58
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Aberdeen Proving Ground (APG) - Edgewood Area
Sample Series: 2/2 Area: Canal Creek
Sampling Date: 01/16/77
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Distance
White
Phosphorous
Water
C53
422.4'
ND
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Distance
White
Phosphorous
Water
C54
C55
C56
528'
2745.6'
5808'
0.43 ug/1
0.07 ug/1
ND
ND - Not detected.
59
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Moyers Landfill Site
Sample Series: 1/1
Sampling Date: 08/03/84
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling Copper
Points Distance Water
SW-3 3,000' ND
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling Copper
Points Distance Water
SW-1 2,800' 13 ug/1
SW-4 3,500' ND
ND - Not detected.
60
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Taylor Borough
Sample Series: 1/1
Sampling Date: 06/18/84
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling Iron Manganese Zinc
Points Distance Sediment Sediment Sediment
TB-SW 001 1680' 118 ug/1 15 ug/1 18 ug/1
TB-SW 001A 1680' 189 ug/1 21 ug/1 18 ug/1
TB-SW 002 1225' 61 ug/1 20 ug/1 19 ug/1
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling Iron Manganese Zinc
Points Distance Sediment Sediment Sediment
TB-SW 003 1120' 75 ug/1 76 ug/1 37 ug/1
TB-SW 004 2170' 803 ug/1 793 ug/1 120 ug/1
61
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Whitmoyer Laboratories
Sample Series: 1/3
Sampling Date: 01/13/84
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
SE01
Distance
18638.4'
Arsenic
Sediment
5. 5 ppm
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling Arsenic
Points Distance Sediment
SE02A 10' 102.0 ppm
SE03 5544' 47.5 ppm
62
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Whitmoyer Laboratories
Sample Series: 2/3
Sampling Date: 01/13/84
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling Arsenic
Points Distance Sediment
SE01 18638.4' < .002 ppb
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling Arsenic
Points Distance Sediment
SE02A 10' 63 ppb
SE03 5544' 53 ppb
63
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Whitmoyer Laboratories
Sample Series: 3/3
Sampling Date: 12/22/71
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
SE01
Distance
18638.4'
Arsenic
Sediment
.004 ppm
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling Arsenic
Points Distance Sediment
SE02A 10' .024 ppm
SE9 20961.6' 0.0 ppm
64
-------
TABLE 1 (Continued)
Site Name: Rohm and Haas
Sample Series: 1/2
Sampling Date: 04/08/84
Stream
Upstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
Distance
Bis(2-chloro-
isopropyl)ether
Water
HRW-5
HRW-6
375'
10'
<10 ug/1
<10 ug/1
Downstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
HRW-7
Distance
900'
Bis(2-chloro-
isopropyl)ether
Water
21 ug/1
65
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Rohm and Haas
Sample Series: 2/2
Sampling Date: 04/08/84
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Lead
Distance
Sediment
Chromium
Sediment
HRSD1
600'
39.5 mg/kg
2.0 mg/kg
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
HRSD2
HRS03
Distance
10'
1200'
Lead
Sediment
2900.0 mg/kg
10.5 mg/kg
Chromium
Sediment
4.36 mg/kg
6.18 mg/kg
66
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Revere Chemical Company
Sample Series: 1/3
Sampling Date: 05/30/84
Stream
Upstream/Organics
Bis(2-ethyl-
Sampling hexyl)phthalate
Points Distance Water
East Trib. Upstream 800' ND
Downstream/0rganics
Bis(2-ethyl-
Sampling hexyl)phthalat e
Points Distance Water
East Trib. Downstream 400' 29 ug/1
Distances estimated.
ND - Not detected.
67
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Revere Chemical Company
Sample Series: 2/3
Sampling Date: 05/30/84
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points Distance
East Trib. 800'
Upstream
Chromium
Water
ND
Beryllium
Water
ND
Copper
Water
ND
Nickel
Water
ND
Lead
Water
ND
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Distance
Chromium Beryllium Copper Nickel Lead
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
East Trib. 400'
Downstream
214 ug/1 9 ug/1 2850 ug/1 48 ug/1 10 ug/1
Distances estimated.
ND - Not detected.
68
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Revere Chemical Company
Sample Series: 2/3
Sampling Date: 05/30/84
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling Zinc
Points Distance Sediment
East Trib. 800' 32 ug/1
Upstream
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling Zinc
Points Distance Sediment
East Trib. 400' 113 ug/1
Downstream
69
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Revere Chemical Company
Sample Series: 3/3
Sampling Date: 05/30/84
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
South Trib.
Upstream
Aluminum
Distance Water
1000' 2180 ug/1
Chromium
Water
ND
Copper
Water
ND
Iron
Water
1890 ug/1
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Aluminum
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Distance
Water
Water
Water
Water
South Trib.
Downstream
500'
10800 ug/1 985 ug/1 3530 ug/1 12700 ug/1
Distances estimated.
ND - Not detected.
70
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Revere Chemical Company
Sample Series: 3/3
Sampling Date: 05/30/84
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points Distance
South Trib. 1000'
Upstream
Lead
Water
ND
Nickel
Water
ND
Manganese
Water
41 ug/1
Zinc
Water
20 ug/1
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Lead
Nickel
Distance
Manganese
Zinc
Water
Water
Water
Water
South Trib.
Downstream
500'
84 ug/1
55 ug/1 615 ug/1 127 ug/1
Distances estimated.
ND - Not detected.
71
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Whitehouse Oil Pits
Sample Series: 1/3 Area: Northeast Tributary
Sampling Date:
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
SW1
Distance
300'
Magnesium
Water
700 ug/1
Zinc
Water
20 ug/1
Downstream /Inorganics
Sampling
Points
SW3
SW4
SW5
Distance
1000'
2500'
3800'
Magnesium
Water
2200 ug/1
1700 ug/1
1700 ug/1
Zinc
Water
80 ug/1
30 ug/1
70 ug/1
72
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Whitehouse Oil Pits
Sample Series: 2/3 Area: Northwest Tributary
Sampling Date:
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics ~
Sampling Iron
Points Distance Sediment
SW1 300' 140 mg/1
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling Iron
Points Distance Sediment
SW3 1000' 1000 ug/1
SW4 2500' 130 ug/1
73
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Whltehouse Oil Pits
Sample Series: 3/3 Area: Northwest Tributary
Sampling Date:
Stream
Upatream/Organics
1,1-Dichloro- 1-Chloro-
2,2-bis- 2,2-bis-
(p-chloro- (chloro-
phenyl) phenyl)
Sampling Chlordane ethane ethane DDT PC]
Points Distance Sediment Sediment Sediment Sediment Sedii
SW1 500' ND ND ND ND N]
D ownst ream/0 rganic s
Sampling
Points Distance
SW3 1000'
SW4 2500'
Chlordane
Sediment
3 ug/1
ND
1,1-Dichloro-
2,2-bis-
(p-chloro-
phenyl)
ethane
Sediment
1.7 ug/1
ND
1-Chloro-
2,2-bis-
(chloro-
phenyl)
ethane
Sediment
.2 ug/1
ND
DDT
Sediment
.5 ug/1
ND
PC]
Sedii
17 u|
N]
ND - Not Detected.
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Jodco-Hughes
Sample Series: 1/1
Sampling Date:
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling Chromium Copper Lead
Points Distance Water Water Water
JH2-XXX-52-W 213' 0 ug/1 0 ug/1 0 ug/1
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling Chromium Copper Lead
Points Distance Water Water Water
JH2-LUTS/W 56.8' 30 ug/1 150 ug/1 35 ug/1
JH2-DDU-10 113.6' 0 ug/1 0 ug/1 0 ug/1
JH2-UFC-9W/S 497' 20 ug/1 0 ug/1 15 ug/1
JH2-FC-5W/S 667.4' 0 ug/1 0 ug/1 0 ug/1
75
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Sangamo Western
Sample Series: 1/1
Sampling Date: 08/76
Stream
Upstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
L47
L48
L44
L45
Distance
9504'
9504'
5280'
5280'
PCS
Sediment
< 0.06 mg/kg
ND
0.10 mg/mg
< 0.20 mg/mg
Downstream/0 rganics
Sampling
Points
L40
L41
L42
L43
L25
L24
L23
Distance
2112'
2112'
5280'
5280'
14784'
34848'
63360'
PCB
Sediment
22.08 mg/kg
2.02 mg/kg
1.69 mg/kg
3.34 mg/kg
3.47 mg/kg
0.26 mg/kg
0.05 mg/kg
ND - Not detected.
76
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Midco II
Sample Series: 1/1
Sampling Date: 01/12/83
Stream
Upstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
SI
Acetone
Distance Water
247.5' 330 ppb
4-Methyl-
2-pentanone
Water
M
Phenol
Water
ND
Downstrearn/Organics
Sampling
Points
Acetone
Distance
4-Methyl-
2-pentanone
Water
Water
Phenol
Water
S2
181.5'
1700 ppb
2200 ppb
22 ppb
M - Data point deemed unreliable during quality assurance.
ND - Not detected.
77
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Arcanum Iron and Metal
Sample Series: 1/1
Sampling Date: 08/85
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
SD4001
SD4002
SD4003
SD4004
Distance
3080'
1280'
960'
160'
Antimony
Sediment
29.0 mg/kg
16.0 mg/kg
25. 7 mg/kg
16.0 mg/kg
Lead
Sediment
17 mg/kg
44 mg/kg
95 mg/kg
22 mg/kg
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
SD4005
SD4005dup
SD4007
SD4008
SD4009
SD4010
Distance
160'
160'
640'
1120'
1200'
1600'
Antimony
Sediment
27.0 mg/kg
ND
37.0 mg/kg
23.0 mg/kg
45.0 mg/kg
ND
Lead
Sediment
199 mg/kg
56 mg/kg
120 mg/kg
339 mg/kg
210 mg/kg
34 mg/kg
Distance estimated.
ND - Not detected.
78
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Coshocton Landfill
Sample Series: 1/3 Area: North Creek
Sampling Date: 02/13-16/84
Stream
Upstream/Organics
Methylene
Sampling Chloride Xylene
Points Distance Water Water
SW9 593.8' ND ND
SW10 332.5' ND ND
Downstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
SW12
SW13
SW14
Distance
902.5'
1805.0'
18052.5'
Methylene
Chloride
Water
10 ug/1
ND
ND
Xylene
Water
4.0 ug/1
ND
ND
ND - Not detected.
79
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Coshocton Landfill
Sample Series: 2/3 Area: West Creek
Sampling Date: 02/13-16/84
Stream
Upstream/Organics
Sampling Acetone
Points Distance Water
SW16 ND
Downstream/Organics
Sampling Acetone
Points Distance Water
SW15 783.8' 25.6 ug/1
SW14 831.3' ND
ND - Not detected.
80
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Coshocton Landfill
Sample Series: 3/3 Area: North Creek
Sampling Date: 02/13-16/84
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
SS9
Distance
593.8'
Chromium
Sediment
6.5 mg/kg
Barium
Sediment
40 mg/kg
Cobalt
Sediment
9 mg/kg
Iron
Sediment
20800 mg/kg
Downstream/ Inorganics
Sampling
Points
SS12
SS14
Distance
902.5'
18052.5'
Chromium
Sediment
14.0 mg/kg
21.0 mg/kg
Barium
Sediment
95 mg/kg
50 mg/kg
Cobalt
Sediment
20 mg/kg
13 mg/kg
Iron
Sediment
533000 mg/kg
42200 mg/kg
81
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Coshocton Landfill
Sample Series: 3/3 Area: North Creek
Sampling Date: 02/13-16/84
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Nickel
Manganese
Vanadium
Arsenic
Distance
Sediment
Sediment
Sediment
Sediment
SS9
593.8'
10 mg/kg
300 mg/kg
ND
6 mg/kg
Downstream/ Inorganics
Sampling
Points
SS12
SS14
Distance
902. 51
18052.5'
Nickel
Sediment
23 mg/kg
19 ug/kg
Manganese
Sediment
1800 mg/kg
550 mg/kg
Vanadium
Sediment
20 mg/kg
10 mg/kg
Arsenic
Sediment
12 mg/kg
11 mg/kg
ND - Not detected.
82
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Fields Brook
Sample Series: 1/10
Sampling Date: 06/83
Stream
Upstream/Organics
Sampling Trichloroethane
Points Distance Water
025 7360' ND
023 4395' ND
020 1747' ND
019 953' ND
Downstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
017
016
Ol6dup
015
013
010
007
004
003
002
001
Distance
10'
2118'
2118'
2753'
3547'
3812'
9107'
9319'
11649'
12284'
15991'
Trichloroethane
Water
7.5 ug/kg
74.0 ug/kg
73.0 ug/kg
64.0 ug/kg
41.0 ug/kg
61.0 ug/kg
25.0 ug/kg
5.0 ug/kg
M
ND
ND
M - Data point deemed unreliable during quality assurance.
ND - Not detected.
83
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Fields Brook
Sample Series: 2/10
Sampling Date: 06/83
Stream
Upstream/Organlcs
Sampling
Points
PCB
Distance
Sediment
025
023
020
019
7360'
4395'
1747'
953'
ND
ND
ND
ND
Downstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
017
Ol7dup
016
016dup
015
OlSdup
013
013dup
010
OlOdup
007
Distance
10'
10'
2118'
2118'
2753'
2753'
3547'
3547'
3812'
3812'
9107'
PCB
Sediment
14189 ug/kg
518293 ug/kg
ND
ND
ND
FN
FN
FN
FN
ND
FN
FN - False negative.
ND - Not detected.
84
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Fields Brook
Sample Series: 3/10
Sampling Date: 06/83
Stream
Upstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
025
023
020
019
017
Distance
9478'
6513'
3865'
3071'
2118'
1,1,2-Tri-
chloroethane
Water
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,1,1,2-Tetra-
chloroethane
Water
ND
ND
ND
ND
5 M
Tetra-
chloroethane
Water
ND
ND
ND
ND
5 M
D ownst ream/ 0 rganic s
Sampling
Points
016
Ol6dup
015
013
010
007
004
003
002
001
Distance
10'
10'
635'
1429'
1694'
6989'
7201'
9531'
10166'
13873'
1,1,2-Tri-
chloroethane
Water
7.2 ug/kg
7.3 ug/kg
6.0 ug/kg
5.0 M
6.5 ug/kg
5.0 M
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,1,1,2-Tetra-
chloroethane
Water
62 ug/kg
65 ug/kg
51 ug/kg
31 ug/kg
72 ug/kg
48 ug/kg
5 M
5 M
5 M
ND
Tetra-
chloroethane
Water
20 ug/kg
19 ug/kg
50 ug/kg
34 ug/kg
35 ug/kg
12 ug/kg
5 M
ND
ND
ND
M - Data point deemed unreliable during quality assurance.
ND - Not detected.
85
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Fields Brook
Sample Series: 3/10
Sampling Date: 06/83
Stream
Upstream/Organics
Sampling Acetone
Points Distance Water
025 9478' ND
023 6513' ND
020 38651 ND
019 3071' ND
017 2118' ND
Downs tream/Organics
Sampling
Points
016
Ol6dup
015
013
010
007
004
003
002
001
Distance
10'
10'
635'
1429'
1694'
6989'
7201'
9531'
10166'
13873'
Acetone
Water
100 ug/kg
110 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
ND
100 M
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
M - Data point deemed unreliable during quality assurance.
ND - Not detected.
86
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Fields Brook
Sample Series: 4/10
Sampling Date: 06/83
S tream
Upstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
025
023
020
019
017
017dup
Distance
9478'
6513'
3865'
3071'
2118'
2118'
Vinyl
Chloride
Sediment
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,2-trans-Di-
chloroethane
Sediment
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Downstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
016
016dup
015
015dup
013
Ol3dup
010
OlOdup
007
Distance
10'
10'
635'
635'
1429'
1429'
1694'
1694'
6989'
Vinyl
Chloride
Sediment
3.3 ug/kg
ND
8.2 ug/kg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,2-trans-Di-
chloroethane
Sediment
30.1 ug/kg
21.0 M
116.0 ug/kg
ND
5.0 M
ND
2.5 M,a
ND
ND
a - Concentration expressed as mg/kg on wet weight basis.
M - Data point deemed unreliable during quality assurance.
ND - Not detected.
87
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Fields Brook
Sample Series: 5/10
Sampling Date: 06/83
Stream
Upstream/Organics
Sampling 1,2-trana-Di-
Points Distance chloroethane
025 10113' ND
023 7148' ND
020 4500' ND
019 3706' ND
017 2753' 5.0 M
016 635' 5.0 M
016dup 635' 5.0 M
Downstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
015
013
010
007
004
004dup
003
002
001
Distance
10'
794'
1059'
6354'
6566'
6566'
8896'
9531'
13238'
1,2-trans-Di-
chloroethane
11.0 ug/kg
8.1 ug/kg
9.3 ug/kg
5.0 M
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
M - Data point deemed unreliable during quality assurance,
ND - Not detected.
88
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Fields Brook
Sample Series: 6/10
Sampling Date: 06/83
Stream
Upstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
025
023
020
019
017
017dup
016
016dup
Distance
10113'
7148'
4500'
3706'
2753'
2753'
635'
635'
Hexathiepane
Sediment
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,2,4-Tri-
thioland
Sediment
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Downstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
015
015dup
013
Ol3dup
010
OlOdup
007
Distance
10'
10'
794'
794'
1059'
1059'
6354'
Hexathiepane
Sediment
1319 ug/kg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,2,4-Tri-
thioland
Sediment
628 ug/kg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND - Not detected.
89
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Fields Brook
Sample Series: 7/10
Sampling Date: 06/83
Stream
Upstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
025
023
020
019
017
Ol7dup
016
Ol6dup
015
OlSdup
Distance
10907'
7942'
5294'
4500'
3547'
3547'
1429'
1429'
794'
794'
1,3,5-Tri-
chlorobenzene
Sediment
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
l.l'-Oxybis-
benzene
Sediment
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1,3-Dichloro-
benzene
Sediment
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Downstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
013
Ol3dup
010
OlOdup
007
Distance
10'
10'
265'
265'
5560'
1,3,5-Tri-
chlorobenzene
Sediment
ND
1065 ug/kg
220 a
ND
ND
l.l'-Oxybis-
benzene
Sediment
ND
617 ug/kg
ND
ND
ND
1,3-Dichloro-
benzene
Sediment
1188 ug/kg
5049 ug/kg
ND
ND
ND
a - Concentrations expressed as mg/kg on a wet weight basis.
ND - Not detected.
90
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Fields Brook
Sample Series: 8/10
Sampling Date: 06/83
Stream
Upstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
025
023
020
019
017
Ol7dup
016
Ol6dup
015
Ol5dup
Distance
10907*
7942'
5294'
4500'
3547'
3547'
1429'
1429'
794'
794'
Chloro-
benzene
Sediment
ND
ND
ND
88.0 M
ND
ND
3.3 M
25.0 M
3.9 M
ND
2-Chloro-
2-butene
Sediment
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
3-Chloro-
2(methyl)-
1-propane
Sediment
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Hexadecane
Sediment
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Downstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
013
Ol3dup
010
OlOdup
007
M - Data
ND - Not
Distance
10'
10'
265'
265'
5560'
point deemed
detected.
Chloro-
benzene
Sediment
7. 7 ug/kg
9.4 ug/kg
ND
ND
ND
unreliable
2-Chloro-
2-butene
Sediment
ND
19 ug/kg
ND
ND
ND
during quality
3-Chloro-
2( methyl )-
1-propane
Sediment
50 ug/kg
22 ug/kg
ND
ND
ND
assurance.
Hexadecane
Sediment
505 ug/kg
ND
ND
1279 ug/kg
ND
91
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Fields Brook
Sample Series: 9/10
Sampling Date: 06/83
Stream
Upstream/Organlcs
Sampling
Points
Distance
1,2,3-Cyclo-
heptatriene
Sediment
010
OlOdup
5295'
5295'
ND
ND
Downstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
007
004
003
002
001
Distance
10'
212'
2542'
3177'
6884'
1,2,3-Cyclo-
heptatriene
Sediment
2206 ug/kg
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND - Not detected.
92
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Fields Brook
Sample Series: 10/10
Sampling Date: 06/83
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
025
023
020
Distance
6407'
3442'
794'
Arsenic
Sediment
5.8 mg/kg
5.5 mg/kg
3.8 mg/kg
Mercury
Sediment
0.01 M
0.05 mg/kg
NR
Thallium
Sediment
0.6 M
0.8 M
0.9 M
Downstream/ Inorganics
Sampling
Points
019
017
Ol7dup
016
Ol6dup
015
OlSdup
013
Ol3dup
010
OlOdup
007
Distance
10'
953'
953'
3071'
3071'
3706'
3706'
4500'
4500'
4765'
4765'
10060 '
Arsenic
Sediment
18.8 mg/kg
7.2 mg/kg
10.5 mg/kg
4.2 mg/kg
7.2 mg/kg
1.3 mg/kg
3.9 mg/kg
9.2 mg/kg
1.0 M
2.6 mg/kg
3.0 mg/kg
0.7 mg/kg
Mercury
Sediment
0.2 mg/kg
1.35 mg/kg
2.29 mg/kg
0.13 mg/kg
0.12 M
0.16 mg/kg
0.24 mg/kg
0.02 M
NR
ND
ND
0.50 mg/kg
Thallium
Sediment
31.5 mg/kg
0.7 M
0.8 M
0.7 M
0.6 M
0.8 M
1.2 M
1.0 M
0.9 M
0.5 M
0.7 M
0.7 M
a - Concentrations expressed as mg/kg on wet weight basis.
M - Data point deemed unreliable during quality assurance.
ND - Not detected.
NR - Value not reported.
93
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: New Lyme Landfill
Sample Series: 1/1
Sampling Date: 12/07-8/83
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling Manganese
Points Distance
Zinc
Water
Water
W02-01
600'
ND
ND
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling Manganese
Points Distance
Zinc
Water
Water
W04-01
2500'
64 ppm
14 ppm
ND - Not detected.
94
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Moss American (Kerr-McGee)
Sample Series: 1/1
Sampling Date: 06/26/76
Stream
Upstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
Pyrene
Fluorene
Distance
Biphenyl Dibenzoferan
Sediment
Sediment
Sediment
Sediment
LMR 5.9
10'
6.7 mg/kg
ND
ND
ND
Downstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
LMR 5.0
LMR 4.0
LMR 3.4
LMR 1.0
Distance
4742'
10022 '
17942'
25862 '
Pyrene
Sediment
330.0 mg/kg
200.0 mg/kg
31.0 mg/kg
5.6 mg/kg
Fluorene
Sediment
276.0 mg/kg
4.9 mg/kg
ND
ND
B iphenyl
Sediment
42.0 mg/kg
ND
ND
ND
Dibenzoferan
Sediment
200.0 mg/kg
2.4 mg/kg
8.4 mg/kg
ND
ND - Not detected.
95
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Moss American (Kerr-McGee)
Sample Series: 1/1
Sampling Date: 06/26/76
Stream
Upst ream/Organics
Sampling
Points Distance
LMR 5.9 10'
Phen-
anthrene
Sediment
3.0 mg/kg
Fluor-
anthene
Sediment
6.1 mg/kg
Acenaph-
thene
Sediment
ND
Downstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
Distance
Phen-
anthrene
Fluor-
anthene
Acenaph-
thene
Sediment
Sediment
Sediment
LMR 5.0
LMR 4.0
LMR 3.4
LMR 1.0
4742'
10022'
17942'
25862'
440.0 mg/kg
13.0 mg/kg
44.0 mg/kg
ND
305.0 mg/kg
200.0 mg/kg
23.0 mg/kg
4.5 mg/kg
300.0 mg/kg
6.5 mg/kg
ND
ND
ND - Not detected.
96
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Sheboygan Harbor & Stream
Sample Series: 1/1
Sampling Date: 05/09/78
Stream
Upstream/Organics
Sampling PCS
Points Distance Sediment
Upstream from 210' 2.4 ppm
Tecumseh
Downstream/0rganics
Sampling PCB
Points Distance Sediment
Downstream from 100' 190.0 ppm
Tecumseh
97
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Montana Pole and Treating Plant
Sample Series: 1/1
Sampling Date: 04/27/83
Stream
Upstream/Organics
Sampling Pentachlorophenol
Points Distance Sediment
83W0829 <0.16 ug/1
Downstream/0rganics
Sampling Pentachlorophenol
Points Distance Sediment
83W0830 3696' 19.00 ug/1
Distance estimated.
98
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Mayflower Mt. Tailings
Sample Series: 1/1
Sampling Date:
Stream
Upstream /Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Upper Creek
Distance
250'
Iron
Water
.190 mg/1
Manganese
Water
.005 mg/1
D ownstream/Inorganic s
Sampling
Points
Iron
Manganese
Distance
Water
Water
Lower Creek
625'
1.920 mg/1 .215 mg/1
99
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Iron Mountain Mine
Sample Series: 1/3
Sampling Date: 05/22/84
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Aluminum
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Distance
Water
Water
Water
Water
70
4500'
167 ug/1 10 ug/1
1.1 ug/1 5 ug/1
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Aluminum
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium
Distance
Water
Water
Water
Water
75
78
41
42
7500'
17600'
33100'
37600'
36,100 ug/1
23,900 ug/1
39 ug/1
10 ug/1
10 ug/1
10 ug/1
150.0 ug/1
14 ug/1
10 ug/1
4 ug/1
4 ug/1
Distances estimated.
100
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Iron Mountain Mine
Sample Series: 1/3
Sampling Date: 05/22/84
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
70
Distance
4500'
Cobalt
Water
10 ug/1
Copper
Water
32 ug/1
Iron
Water
0.18 ug/1
Lead
Water
1 ug/1
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
75
78
41
42
Distance
7500'
17600'
33100'
37600'
Cobalt
Water
31 ug/1
24 ug/1
10 ug/1
10 ug/1
Copper
Water
1760 ug/1
1830 ug/1
Iron
Water
197.0 ug/1
Lead
Water
14 ug/1
14 ug/1
ND
9 ug/1
Distances estimated.
101
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Iron Mountain Mine
Sample Series: 1/3
Sampling Date: 05/22/84
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Distance
Magnesium
Manganese
Water
Water
Platinum
Water
70
4500'
2520 ug/1
29 ug/1
< 10 ug/1
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
75
78
41
42
Distance
7500'
17600'
33100'
37600'
Magnesium
Water
24600 ug/1
19400 ug/1
Manganese
Water
881 ug/1
1040 ug/1
4 ug/1
4 ug/1
Platinum
Water
23 ug/1
<10 ug/1
Distances estimated.
ND - Not detected.
102
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Iron Mountain Mine
Sample Series: 1/3
Sampling Date: 05/22/84
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling Potassium Vanadium Zinc
Points Distance Water Water Water
70 4500' < 200 ug/1 <4 ug/1 148 ug/1
Downst rearn/Inorganic s
Sampling Potassium Vanadium Zinc
Points Distance Water Water Water
75 7500' 1680 ug/1 29 ug/1 19800 ug/1
78 17600' 800 ug/1 10 ug/1 12900 ug/1
41 33100' 5 ug/1 5 ug/1
42 37600' <4 ug/1 5 ug/1
Distances estimated.
103
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Iron Mountain Mine
Sample Series: 2/3
Sampling Date: 05/23/84
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
4
Distance
1500'
Aluminum
Water
17900 ug/1
Arsenic
Water
10 ug/1
Beryllium
Water
< 1 ug/1
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Aluminum
Arsenic
Distance
Beryllium
Water
Water
Water
500'
113000 ug/1
265 ug/1
2 ug/1
Distances estimated.
104
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Iron Mountain Mine
Sample Series: 2/3
Sampling Date: 05/23/84
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Distance
Water
Water
Water
1500'
ND
12 ug/1
18 ug/1
Downst ream/Inorganic s
Sampling
Points
Cadmium
Chromium
Cobalt
Distance
Water
Water
Water
500'
690 ug/1
65 ug/1
97 ug/1
Distances estimated.
ND - Not detected.
105
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Iron Mountain Mine
Sample Series: 2/3
Sampling Date: 05/23/84
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
4
Distance
1500'
Iron
Water
12.5 ug/1
Lead
Water
8 ug/1
Magnesium
Water
14,300 ug/1
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling Iron Lead Magnesium
Points Distance Water Water Water
5 500' 1040 ug/1 20 ug/1 67,000 ug/1
106
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Iron Mountain Mine
Sample Series: 2/3
Sampling Date: 05/23/84
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling Manganese Nickel Potassium
Points Distance Water Water Water
4 1500' 505 ug/1 15 ug/1 200 ug/1
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling Manganese Nickel Potassium
Points Distance Water Water Water
5 500' 2050 ug/1 53 ug/1 9310 ug/1
Distances estimated.
107
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Iron Mountain Mine
Sample Series: 2/3
Sampling Date: 05/23/84
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
4
Distance
1500'
Vanadium
Water
4 ug/1
Zinc
Water
4690 ug/1
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling Vanadium
Points Distance
Zinc
Water
Water
500'
148 ug/1
105000 ug/1
Distances estimated.
108
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Iron Mountain Mine
Sample Series: 3/3
Sampling Date: 05/30/84
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
61
Distance
500'
Aluminum
Water
7 ug/1
Beryllium
Water
< 1 ug/1
Cadmium
Water
< 1 ug/1
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Distance
Aluminum
Beryllium
Water
Water
Cadmium
Water
37
500'
210000 ug/1
3 ug/1
137 ug/1
Distances estimated.
ND - Not detected.
109
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Iron Mountain Mine
Sample Series: 3/3
Sampling Date: 05/30/84
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
61
Distance
500'
Chromium
Water
< 4 ug/1
Copper
Water
7 ug/1
Iron
Water
0.63 ug/1
Downstream /Inorganic a
Sampling
Points
37
Distance
500*
Chromium
Water
24 ug/1
Copper
Water
17100 ug/1
Iron
Water
390.0 ug/1
Distances estimated.
ND - Not detected.
110
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Iron Mountain Mine
Sample Series: 3/3
Sampling Date: 05/30/84
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling Lead Magnesium Manganese
Points Distance Water Water Water
61 500' 1 ug/1 2910 ug/1 89 ug/1
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling Lead Magnesium Manganese
Points Distance Water Water Water
37 500' 287 ug/1 147000 ug/1 5460 ug/1
Distances estimated.
Ill
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: MGM Brakes
Sample Series: 1/1
Sampling Date: 11/09/81
Stream
Upstream/Organics
Sampling PCB
Points Distance* Water
ND
Downstream/Organics
Sampling PCB
Points Distance* Water
10' 1.0 ppb
600' 0.5 ppb
1200' 0.1 ppb
2640' ND
7920' ND
*Distance and concentration data taken from text, no map available.
ND - Not detected.
112
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Sacramento Army Depot
Sample Series: 1/1
Sampling Date:
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
403
404
Distance
3240'
0'
Chromium
Sediment
21 ug/g
12 ug/g
Copper
Sediment
6.6 ug/g
3.3 ug/g
Lead
Sediment
8.8 ug/g
7.6 ug/g
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling Chromium Copper Lead
Points Distance Sediment Sediment Sediment
405 7560' 46 ug/g 110.0 ug/g 37.0 ug/g
412 7860' 43 ug/g 39.0 ug/g 11.0 ug/g
113
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Sacramento Army Depot
Sample Series: 1/1
Sampling Date:
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
403
404
Distance
3240'
10'
Zinc
Sediment
32 ug/g
16 ug/g
Nickel
Sediment
13.0 ug/g
5.3 ug/g
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling Zinc Nickel
Points Distance Sediment Sediment
405 7560' 120 ug/g 39.0 ug/g
412 7860' 130 ug/g 46.0 ug/g
114
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Western Processing
Sample Series: 1/2
Sampling Date: 01/84
Stream
Upstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
Distance
Trichloro-
ethylene
Isophorone
Naphthalene
Water
Water
Water
Station 8
2 u
0.03 u
0.06 u
D ownst ream/0 rganic s
Sampling
Points
Station 6A
Station 1
Distance
600'
1500'
Trichloro-
ethylene
Water
15 ug/1
12 ug/1
Isophorone
Water
0.15 ug/1
0.03 u
Naphthalene
Water
0.13 ug/1
0.03 u
Distances estimated.
u - Not detected above level shown.
115
-------
TABLE B-l (Continued)
Site Name: Western Processing
Sample Series: 1/2
Sampling Date: 01/84
Stream
Upstream/Organlcs
Sampling
Points Distance
2,4-Di-
chlorophenol
Sediment
2,4-Dimethyl-
phenol
Sediment
Station 8
0.1 u
0.1 u
D owns t ream /O rganic s
Sampling
Points
Station 6A
Station 1
Distance
600'
1500'
2,4-Di-
chlorophenol
Sediment
0.7 ug/1
0.1 u
2,4-Dimethyl-
phenol
Sediment
0.7 ug/1
0.1 u
Distances estimated.
u - Not detected above level shown.
116
-------
TABLE B-l (Concluded)
Site Name: Western Processing
Sample Series: 2/2
Sampling Date: 01/84
Stream
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Cadmium
Zinc
Distance
Sediment
Sediment
Station 8
.2 u
32 ug/1
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Station 6A
Station 1
Distance
600'
1500'
Cadmium
Sediment
10.8 ug/1
11.2 ug/1
Zinc
Sediment
695 ug/1
729 ug/1
Distances estimated.
u - Not detected above level shown.
117
-------
TABLE B-2
SURFACE WATER SAMPLING DATA, STATIC WATERS
Site Name: Hocomonco Pond Site
Sample Series: 1/1
Sampling Date: 03/02-03/06/84
Static Water
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Aluminum
Arsenic
Distance
Sediment
Sediment
Barium
Sediment
SD-7
832.5'
1400 mg/kg
0.5 mg/kg
10.0 mg/kg
D owns t r earn / 1 no rganic s
Sampling
Points
SD-10
SD-2
SD-13A
SD-15A
SD-14A
SD-11
SD-8
SD-16
SD-12
Distance
10.0'
10.0'
22.5'
45.0'
56.3'
90.0'
247.5'
247.5'
405.0'
Aluminum
Sediment
5810 mg/kg
3030 mg/kg
736 mg/kg
1180 mg/kg
319 mg/kg
1260 mg/kg
6030 mg/kg
9670 mg/kg
2920 mg/kg
Arsenic
Sediment
5.8 mg/kg
2.0 mg/kg
9.0 mg/kg
5.0 mg/kg
2.0 mg/kg
2.0 mg/kg
5.6 mg/kg
9.7 mg/kg
4.0 mg/kg
Barium
Sediment
30.0 mg/kg
10.0 mg/kg
5.0 mg/kg
9.0 mg/kg
5.0 mg/kg
5.0 mg/kg
30.0 mg/kg
69.0 mg/kg
20.0 mg/kg
118
-------
TABLE B-2 (Continued)
Site Name: Hocomonco Pond Site
Sample Series: 1/1
Sampling Date: 03/02-03/84
Static Water
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
SD-7
Distance
832.5'
Copper
Water
3.0 mg/kg
Manganese
Water
34 mg/kg
Nickel
Water
2.0 mg/kg
Zinc
Water
13.0 mg/kg
Downstream/ Inorganics
Sampling
Points
SD-10
SD-2
SD-13A
SD-15A
SD-14A
SD-11
SD-8
SD-16
SD-12
Distance
10.0'
10.0'
22.5'
450.0'
56.3'
90.0'
247.5'
247.5'
405.0'
Copper
Water
10.0 mg/kg
8.0 mg/kg
2.0 mg/kg
4.0 mg/kg
2.0 mg/kg
5.0 mg/kg
12.0 mg/kg
12.0 mg/kg
10.0 mg/kg
Manganese
Water
108 mg/kg
68 mg/kg
54 mg/kg
70 mg/kg
65 mg/kg
92 mg/kg
302 mg/kg
174 mg/kg
206 mg/kg
Nickel
Water
6.1 mg/kg
4.0 mg/kg
2.0 mg/kg
2.0 mg/kg
2.0 mg/kg
2.0 mg/kg
5.0 mg/kg
10.0 mg/kg
4.0 mg/kg
Zinc
Water
32.0 mg/kg
13.0 mg/kg
4.0 mg/kg
40.0 mg/kg
5.0 mg/kg
12.0 mg/kg
35.0 mg/kg
41.0 mg/kg
44.0 mg/kg
119
-------
TABLE B-2 (Continued)
Site Name: Re-Solve, Inc.
Site ID: 01MA016
Sample Series: 1/1
Sampling Date: ll/20/84
Static Water
Upstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
PCB
Distance
Sediment
49
2.6 ppm
Downstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
50
52
51
53
54
55
Distance
10'
10'
26.66'
33.33'
33.33'
33.33'
PCB
Sediment
37.5 ppm
102.7 ppm
6.2 ppm
6.3 ppm
11.3 ppm
13.7 ppm
120
-------
TABLE B-2 (Continued)
Site Name: Bridgeport Rental & Oil Services
Sample Series: 1/3
Sampling Date: 07/26/83
Static Water
Upstream/Inorganics
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)
Sampling phthalate PCS
Points Distance Sediment Sediment
SD-01 1100' ND ND
SD-04 850' LT 96 ug/kg
Downstream/Organics
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)
Sampling phthalate PCB
Points Distance Sediment Sediment
SD-02 100' 22000 ug/kg 2500 ug/kg
SD-05 150' ND 190 ug/kg
K - Multiply value shown by 1000.
M - Data point deemed unreliable during quality assurance.
LT - Less than detection limit.
ND - Not detected.
121
-------
TABLE B-2 (Continued)
Site Name: Bridgeport Rental & Oil Services
Sample Series: 2/3
Sampling Date: 07/26/83
Static Water
Upstream/0rganics
Sampling
Points
PCB
Distance
Water
SW-01
1100'
ND
Downstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
PCB
Distance
Water
SW-02
SW-05
100'
150'
34.0 ug/kg
3.6 ug/kg
ND - Not detected.
122
-------
TABLE B-2 (Continued)
Site Name: Bridgeport Rental & Oil Services
Sample Series: 3/3
Sampling Date: 07/13/82
Static Water
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
SW-01
Distance
1100'
Magnesium
Water
260 ug/1
Zinc
Water
110 ug/1
D ownst ream /Ino rganic s
Sampling Magnesium Zinc
Points Distance Water Water
SW-02 100' 6100 ug/1 310 ug/1
123
-------
TABLE B-2 (Continued)
Site Name: Aberdeen Proving Ground (APG) - Edgewood Area
Sample Series: 1/2 Area: "0" Field, Watson Creek
Sampling Date: 1977
Static Water
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling Arsenic
Points Distance Sediment
S003 1312.5' 11.5 ug/1
S055 1750.0' ND
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
S005
S023
SO 24
S001
S025
Distance
10.0'
10.0'
87.5'
175.0'
175.0'
Arsenic
Sediment
53.2 ug/1
48.7 ug/1
24.5 ug/1
8.8 ug/1
15.1 ug/1
ND - Not detected.
124
-------
TABLE B-2 (Continued)
Site Name: Aberdeen Proving Ground (APG) - Edgewood Area
Sample Series: 2/2 Area: "0" Field, Watson Creek
Sampling Date: 04/10/77
Static Water
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling Arsenic
Points Distance Sediment
S026 175.0' 21.6 ug/1
S027 262.5' 32.4 ug/1
S006 350.0' 38.1 ug/1
S002 350.0' 12.2 ug/1
S052 437.5' 43.4 ug/1
S004 437.5' 7.2 ug/1
S008 700.0' 7.5 ug/1
S009 778.5' 18.3 ug/1
S021 787.5' 38.3 ug/1
S022 831.3' 37.8 ug/1
S010 875.0' 42.8 ug/1
S051 962.5' 5.5 ug/1
S020 1050.0' 24.2 ug/1
125
-------
TABLE B-2 (Continued)
Site Name: Aberdeen Proving Ground (APG) - Edgewood Area
Sample Series: 2/2 Area: "0" Field, Watson Creek
Sampling Date: 04/10/77
Static Water
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling Arsenic
Points Distance Sediment
S010 437.5' 15.0 ug/1
S09 318.75' 10.0 ug/1
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling Arsenic
Points Distance Sediment
X01 10.0' 49.0 ug/1
SOS 787.5' 12.0 ug/1
126
-------
TABLE B-2 (Continued)
Site Name: Sangamo/Crab Orchard
Sample Series: 1/1
Sampling Date: 05/25/83
Static Water
Upstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
8
15
3
14
2
9
1
10
Distance
4,250'
9,500'
7,000'
14,000'
25,200'
29,400'
30,800'
42,000'
PCS
Sediment
< 10 ppb
< 10 ppb
<10 ppb
< 10 ppb
<10 ppb
< 10 ppb
< 10 ppb
<10 ppb
Downstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
13
12
11
7
4
Distance
500'
1,400'
2,700'
3,000'
4,000'
PCB
Sediment
270 ppb
13 ppb
12 ppb
120 ppb
<10 ppb
127
-------
TABLE B-2 (Continued)
Site Name: Wyckoff Co. - Eagle Harbor
Sample Series: 1/1
Sampling Date: 05/07/84
Static Water
Upstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
33
30
51
17
Distance
1400'
1200'
1100'
1000'
Benzo(a)-
pyrene
Sediment
M
M
ND
ND
Napthalene
Sediment
ND
M
ND
ND
Anthracene
Sediment
M
M
ND
ND
Downstream/Organics
Sampling
Points
14
20
21
27
28
Distance
10'
10'
10'
500'
600'
Benzo(a)-
pyrene
Sediment
ND
M
8789 ug/kg
9800 ug/kg
M
Napthalene
Sediment
27182 ug/kg
M
M
M
50600 ug/kg
Anthracene
Sediment
ND
3949 ug/kg
ND
41300 ug/kg
M
M - Data point deemed unreliable during quality assurance.
ND - Not detected.
128
-------
TABLE B-2 (Continued)
Site Name: NUWES Keyport
Sample Series: 1/1
Sampling Date: 1976
Static Water
Upstream/ Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Background
Aluminum
Distance Water
1000' 3200 ppm
Arsenic
Water
3 ppm
Chromium
Water
10 ppm
Copper
Water
20 ppm
Downst ream/ Inorganic s
Sampling
Points
Area 9 Pier
Disposal
Area 9 Pier
Disposal
Area 9 Pier
Disposal
Aluminum
Distance Water
10' 9700 ppm
10' 3400 ppm
10' 6900 ppm
Arsenic
Water
40 ppm
6 ppm
5 ppm
Chromium
Water
40 ppm
10 ppm
10 ppm
Copper
Water
530 ppm
230 ppm
90 ppm
129
-------
TABLE B-2 (Continued)
Site Name: NUWES Keyport
Sample Series: 2/3
Sampling Date: 1976
Static Water
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Manganese
Mercury
Distance
Sediment
Sediment
Background
1000'
90 ppm
.056 ppm
Downstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Area 9 Pier
Disposal
Area 9 Pier
Disposal
Area 9 Pier
Disposal
Distance
10'
10'
10'
Manganese
Sediment
220 ppm
100 ppm
70 ppm
Mercury
Sediment
. 20 ppm
. 13 ppm
. 74 ppm
130
-------
TABLE B-2 (Concluded)
Site Name: NUWES Keyport
Sample Series: 3/3
Sampling Date: 1976
Static Water
Upstream/Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Nickel
Zinc
Distance
Sediment
Sediment
Background
1000'
10 ppm
30 ppm
Downstream /Inorganics
Sampling
Points
Area 9 Pier
Disposal
Area 9 Pier
Disposal
Area 9 Pier
Disposal
Distance
10'
10'
10'
Nickel
Sediment
30 ppm
10 ppm
10 ppm
Zinc
Sediment
210 ppm
130 ppm
240 ppm
131
------- |