EMISSIONS TEST REPORT
AIR TOXICS SAMPLING AT WYCKOFF, INC.
BAINBRIDGE ISLAND, WASHINGTON
Submitted to
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region X
1200 Sixth Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98101
March 1986
46921.00/39-N
Submitt •• :
Engineering- Sci '-:nce
10521 Rosehave.i Street
Fairfax, Virginia 22030
[UU1
D
IUU1
0)
111
-------
EMISSIONS TEST REPORT
AIR TOXICS SAMPLING AT WYCKOFF, INC.
BAINBRIDGE ISLAND, WASHINGTON
Submitted to
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region X
1200 Sixth Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98101
March 1986
46921.00/39-N
Submitted by
Engineering-Science
10521 Rosehaven Street
Fairfax, Virginia 22030
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
CHAPTER 2 PROCESS DESCRIPTION
CHAPTER 3 TEST SCHEDULE AND SAMPLING LOCATIONS
CHAPTER 4 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
CHAPTER 5 RESULTS
APPENDICES
A PROCESS RECORDS
B FIELD DATA
C LABORATORY DATA
D EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS
1-1
2-1
3-1
4-1
5-1
11
-------
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
From July 22 to August 2, 1985, ES sampled five sources at two
plants in the Seattle, Washington area to collect data on emission of
toxic compounds. This report discusses the results of sampling two
vacuum exhausts and the fugitive emissions from two retorts at Wyckoff,
inc.'s, creosote treating plant.
1-1
-------
CHAPTER 2
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
Wyckoff, Inc., operates a log-treating plant on Bainbridge Island
which is devoted to pentachlorophenol and creosote pressure-treating of
logs for utility poles and marine pilings. The equipment for treating
the logs is the same regardless of the preservative being used, although
operating parameters are somewhat different.
Wyckoff has six retorts (five of which are operable) connected to
two vacuum systems. In one system, one retort is used solely for penta
treating, and one for either penta or creosote. The other system (three
retorts) is dedicated to creosote treating. Each retort is a steam-
jacketed insulated cylinder 130 feet long with a 90-inch inside diameter.
Logs are debarked, loaded onto trams, and placed inside a retort. The
door to the end of the retort is closed and bolted shut and the treating
cycle commenced.
The treating process consists of several major phases and some minor
ones, and there are general operating standards established by the Douglas
Fir Association. The actual operating conditions and inclusion or exclu-
sion of certain steps are determined by the operating personnel. The sam-
pling plan was predicated on an incomplete understanding of the standard
cycle and was not appropriate for the way the process is operated, at
least at this facility. The following paragraph discusses the process as
operated at Wyckoff.
The first step after bolting the door is evacuating the retort to
22" Hg which takes 45-60 minutes. The retort is then filled, via vacuum,
with preservative and heated to 210°F with the steam jacket. The contents
are held at 210° and 22" vacuum for about 48 hours. This conditioning
phase removes water from the logs and the phase is ended when all the
water has been extracted, as measured by periodic gauging of the col-
lected water. After conditioning, the vacuum is released and the retort
emptied, refilled with cold preservative, and then emptied again. This
phase takes about three hours, and then the retort is pressurized with 30
psig air for about an hour. The retort is again filled (1-1/2 - 2 hours)
with preservative and the pressure-treating begun. The bath is heated to
240°F and kept under pressure for about two hours. An optional expansion
bath, lasting 1-2 hours if used, follows the pressure-treating. The re-
tort is again pumped out (one hour) and live steam injected for two hours.
The last step is called final vacuum and removes residual preservative
and allows the load to cool down. When the temperature drops below 175°F,
the door can be opened and the load removed.
2-1
-------
Normally, the door is open for about 30 minutes while the load is pulled
out and a new load put in. Copies of the process records for the loads
handled while sampling was being performed are included in Appendix A.
The initial plan for sampling envisioned that vacuum vent emissions
occurred during several phases because the retort was placed under vacuum
during these times. However, this vacuum was used as the motive force
for filling the retort with liquid and thus there was no discharge to
the atmosphere as a result. Observations of the process and additonal
discussions with plant management and operating personnel confirmed that
significant emissions occurred throughout the entire conditioning time
and during final vacuum and not during other phases of the heating pro-
cess. These two phases were the ones sampled.
The pollutants of concern are pentachlorophenol (CgHC^), creosote
compounds and PNAs. The specific compounds that comprise creosote are
PNAs and typically include 2-4% each of acenaphthene, fluorene, dipheny-
lene oxide, anthracene, carbazole, 12-14% phenanthrene and naphthalene
The remainder is unspecified PNAs. Penta consists of 5% pentachlorophenol
in a light fuel oil (equivalent to #2 diesel fuel).
2-2
-------
CHAPTER 3
TEST SCHEDULE AND SAMPLING LOCATIONS
As previously discussed, emission samples were taken from the vacuum
vents when emissions were being vented, and from the open retort during
load changes. Separate samples were taken from creosote and from penta
treating. Each test involved collecting duplicate samples with paired
sampling trains. Figures 3.1 and 3.2 portray the general arrangements
for vacuum vent and retort fugitive sampling.
Table 3.1 provides a chronological summary of the test runs. As
mentioned in Chapter 2, initially, samples were to be collected during
other phases of the treating cycle. Observation of the process and fur-
ther clarifications of the process by plant management led to the conclu-
sion that the emissions during these other phases were negligible and
therefore were not sampled. Copies of the field data are included as
Appendix B.
3-1
-------
TABLE 3.1
SAMPLING CHRONOLOGY
Date
7/26/85
7/29/85
7/31/85
7/31/85
7/31/85
U)
to
7/31/85
8/1/85
8/1/85
Run Code
WCF-X-1A
WCF-X-1B
WPV-MM5-1A
WPV-MM5-1B
WPV-MM5-2A
WPV-MM5-2B
WPF-X-1A
WPF-X-1 B
WCF-X-2A
WCF-X-2B
WCV-M5-1A
WCV-M5-1B
WCV-X-2
WCV-MM5-2A
WCV-MM5-2B
Sampling Time
1248-1319
1248-1319
1235-1435
1230-1430
0927-1106
0922-1102
1116-1209
1116-1209
1337-1410
1337-1417
1700-1830
1705-1825
0808-0828
1800-1900
1805-1900
Sample Type
NIOSH-XAD
NIOSH-XAD
MM5-XAD
MM5-XAD
MM5-XAD
MM5-XAD
NIOSH-XAD
NIOSH-XAD
NIOSH-XAD
NIOSH-XAD
MM5-XAD
MM5-XAD
NIOSH-XAD
MM5-XAD
MM5-XAD
Retort
D
D
E
E
E
E
E
E
D
D
C
C
C
C
C
Process Cycle
Creosote fugitives
Creosote fugitives
Penta-conditioning
Initial vacuum
Penta-cool down
Final vacuum
Penta fugitives
Creosote fugitives
Creosote-conditioning
Initial vacuum
Creosote-conditioning
End of vacuum
Creosote-cool down
Final vacuum
-------
CHAPTER 4
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
The sampling and analytical procedures for this project are derived
from EPA's "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste" (SW-846, July 1982);
"Sampling and Analysis Methods for Hazardous Waste Combustion (Draft)"
(A.D. Little, Inc., February 1983); "NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods",
U.S. DHEW, NIOSH, Publication #75-121; and Title 40, Part 60, Appendix
A, Code of Federal Regulations. The laboratory results are contained in
Appendix C of this report.
SAMPLING PROCEDURES
Modified Method 5 - General
The MM5 sampling train was used to collect organic compounds with
boiling points between 100°C and 300°C such as products of incomplete
combustion (PICs), PNAs, PCP and creosote compounds.
Extracts, rinses, and related materials from the sampling system for
each sampling period were analyzed to quantify the specific compounds of
interest for each test. A total of 13 runs were conducted.
Sampling Train
The gas stream was directed to a modified EPA Method 5 train, de-
picted in Figure 4.1. This system consists of the following components
in series: nozzle, probe, heated particle filter, one sorbent module, a
bank of impingers, and a meter box. A detailed discussion of the physi-
cal construction of the unmodified Method 5 train and its assembly is
given by Martin; maintenance is given by Rom (APTD-0581, APTD-0576).
A glass fiber (particle) filter was enclosed in a glass housing and
supported by a stainless steel mesh. This section of the train was con-
tained in an electrically heated box with manual temperature regulation
to maintain a sample gas temperature of about 120°C.
A typical sorbent module/condenser is also depicted in Figure 4-1 .
There are separate sections for cooling the incoming gas stream and for
trapping organic gas constituents. Cooling was accomplished by routing
the gas through a coil of glass tubing surrounded by water circulated
from an ice and water bath. Organic consitutents of the gas are removed
by 20/40 mesh XAD-2 resin contained in an all-glass trap. High collec-
tion efficiencies (90-100%) are typical for vapor phase organic species
4-1
-------
Filler Holder
Thermocouple-
S" Type
Pitot
Water Jacketed Condenser
Thermocouple
f Sorbenl Trap
X"
Thermometer
Check Valve
Recirculation Pump
Dry Gai Meter Air-Tight
Pump
Vacuum Line
Figure 4.1 MMr> Train sclirmatic diagram
-------
The temperature of the gas at the outlet of the sorbent was measured
and maintained between the limits of 0° and 20°C. Cooling of the gas con-
denses part of the sample gas moisture which may entrain and/or dissolve
certain organic species. To insure that this material is collected, the
sorbent module was positioned vertically such that the condensate perco-
lated through the resin bed and into the bank of impingers.
During sampling of Wyckoff's vacuum vents, the mass of organic matter
condensed on the surfaces of the cooling coil was large enough to markedly
reduce the heat transfer rate and prevented proper cooling of the sample
gas. The detailed results section of this report contains additional
discussion of the effects of the organic compound condensation.
The impinger bank consisted of four impingers connected in series.
The first impinger was initially empty to collect the condensate from the
preceding sorbent module. The Greenberg-Smith nozzle was replaced by a
very short stem such that the sampled gas does not bubble through the
collected condensate.
The second and third•impingers were included to remove acid species
from the gas, and each contained 100 ml chromatographic-grade distilled
water. The fourth impinger was filled with silica gel to absorb moisture
remaining in the gas, thereby assuring accurate gas flow measurements and
preventing damage to the pumping system.
A standard Method 5 meter box containing a variety of gas handling
and metering devices followed the impinger bank.
All components of the sampling train were joined either by stainless
steel Swagelok® fittings or by ground glass ball-and-socket joints cap-
able of leak-free seals under sampling conditions. Stopcock grease was
not used at any point in the system.
All components of the train which contact the sample gas were vigor-
ously cleaned prior to transport to the field. The cleaning consisted of
soaking in chromerge®, rinsing with tap water, distilled water, and chrom-
atographic-grade methanol, successively. All components were sealed with
methylene chloride-rinsed aluminum foil. Preparation of the XAD modules
and resin is discussed in the analytical section.
prior to each run, the individual components of the sampling train
were assembled, and the probe/sampling train leak-tested. The heating
and cooling systems are started and allowed to reach equilibrium. Then,
the nozzle was plugged and the system evacuated to about 200 mm Hg (15").
If the leakage exceeded the lesser of 4% of the sampling rate or 0.02
cfm, the leak was corrected.
Sampling Procedure
The sampling plan called for multiple point isokinetic sampling for
3-4 hours. The condensation of organic material discussed above was
great enough to prevent sampling isokinetically for the duration of the
sampling period. Further, the exhaust gas velocity was very low across
the cross section of the stack and, within the accuracy of the pitot tube
4-3
-------
the cross section of the stack and, within the accuracy of the pitot tube
system, essentially constant so lack of multiple point traversing and
isokinetic sampling was judged to have minimal consequences. The samples
were collected at a point of average velocity at a rate as near to isokinetic
as possible.
Post-Test Operations
At the conclusion of the test, the train was leak checked and al-
lowed to cool. The probe/nozzle unit was removed and capped, and the
filter holder inlet capped, and all components taken to the cleanup area
for sample recovery. The basic procedures of EPA Method 5 were followed,
modified as necessary for recovery of samples for organic analysis. The
probe, nozzle and filter holder were each rinsed three times with ace-
tone and then three times with methylene chloride. All liquid samples
were transferred to glass bottles with Teflon®-lined caps which had been
cleaned as previously described for the glassware. The XAD module was
removed from the train and sealed with grease-free glass balls and sock-
ets. The impingers were removed and the volume of condensed water col-
lected measured. The percolated condensate from the first impinger was
transferred to a sample bottle along with rinses from the condenser, the
contents of the second and third impingers and acetone and methylene
chloride rinses of all three impingers and connecting glassware. All
bottles were tightly capped, sealed with Teflon®-lined caps and Teflon®
tape, and the liquid level marked on the bottles.
For these tests, one XAD module was exposed as a field blank to the
lab. There was one trip blank included in the shipment. The field blanks
were installed into a sample train, leak checked, heated to 120°C for 2
hours, and then recovered along with the other sample train fractions.
NIOSH Sorbent Tube Sampling
Retort fugitive emissions were to be sampled for 6 hours (3 runs @
2 hours/run) with a MM5 train. This approach became impractical when we
discovered that the door was left open for only half an hour rather than
8 hours. A sampling system using NIOSH-type sorbent tubes was devised to
collect a sample in a short time (approximately 30 minutes) and retain
the analytical sensitivity of MM5.
Sampling Train
Figure 4.2 displays a typical NIOSH design sorbent tube and the
sampling train used to extract the sample gas from the stack. An EPA
Method 6 type metering/flow control system was used to pull the sample
gas and measure the sampled gas volume. The sample train consisted of
one or two sorbent tubes containing 600 mg of XAD-2, a moisture removal
trap, sample line, and control console containing pump, rotameter and dry
gas meter. Flow rates and total gas volume were set and measured to
match the capacity of the sorbent and the analytical sensitivity neces-
sary. Two separate systems were used to collect duplicate samples.
4-4
-------
STAINLESS STEEL
PROBE
\
NIOSH
DESIGN
CHARCOAL TUBE
m_/n
SILICA GEL
DRYING TUBE
IVS/VS/Vs/M
PsAA/sAA/vl
COARSE VALVE
\
THERMOCOUPLES
\
GLASS/TUBING
FITTINGS
£>£>
PRECISON
ROTAMETER
1 \
DRY GAS
METER
SURGE
TANK
A
DIAPHRAGM
PUMP
VALVE
FIGURE 4.2
CHARCOAL TUBE SAMPLING TRAIN
-------
Figure 4.3 shows how the tubes, sample lines and anemometer were
assembled. The anemometer was used to obtain an average velocity for the
sampling time as well as intermediate velocity readings. The area of the
retort opening which had gas outflowing or inflowing was estimated by
observing a set of wind sock "directional flags" placed in front of the
opening.
Sampling Procedure
Samples were collected by breaking off the ends of the flame sealed
sorbent tubes and pulling sample gas through the tube at 0.25 liter/minute
for about 30 minutes. At the conclusion of sampling, the tubes were re-
moved from the trains and capped with caps supplied by the manufacturer,
and then placed in an envelope, pre-labeled with the date, run number, and
sample ID number.
Post-Test Operations
Field blanks were taken by breaking the ends of a tube and exposing
to ambient air for a time period equal to sample collection time. A trip
blank (a tube taken to the field but not opened) was stored and shipped
with the sample tubes.
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
Modified Method 5 Analyses
preparation and analysis of the MM5 samples is described below.
1. Container No. 1 (contents of the first, second, and third impin-
gers from the MM5 sample train) - Noted the physical properties of the
sample as to color, consistency, presence of solids, and measured the
volume. Spiked the sample as necessary with the required surrogate com-
pounds for QC purposes. Without adjusting the sample pH, transferred
the impinger solution to a 1000-ml separatory funnel. Rinsed the sample
container with 20 ml of acetone, followed by two 20 ml portions of methy-
lene chloride, adding the rinses to the separatory funnel. Extracted the
sample with three separate aliquots of methylene chloride, transferring
to a K-D evaporator, after filtering through pre-extracted, dried Na2SO4.
2. Container No. 2 (methylene chloride, acetone rinse of probe,
filter housing, and any miscellaneous glassware) - Noted the physical
properties of the sample as to color, consistency, presence of solids,
and measure the volume. Spiked the original solvent sample as necessary
for QC purposes. Added to the K-D evaporator as in Step A.
3. Container No. 3 (filter) - Noted the physical properties of the
filter as to color, consistency, and presence of particles. Placed the
filter into the thimble containing the XAD-2® resin and proceed as des-
cribed in 4 below.
4-6
-------
ANEHWETER/XAD 1UE SAMPLING HEAD
SAMPLING HEAD ETAIL
HEAD LOCATION DURING SAMPLING
TREATING RETORT
METER BOXES
SAMPLE
LINES
RETORT FUGITIVE SAMPLING SCHEMATIC
-------
4. XAD-2® Adsorbent - Observed and noted the physical properties of
the sample. Spiked the sample as necessary with compounds directly into
the adsorbents before their removal from the glass sorbent trap. Expel
the entire contents of the sorbent trap into a glass extraction thimble
with a coarse-fritted bottom.
The resin in the thimble was covered with glass wool to prevent the
resin from floating out into the Soxhlet extractor. The sorbent trap was
rinsed with 10 ml acetone and then three 10 ml portions of methylene chlo-
ride, and these rinses added to the receiver. The Soxhlet extractor was
charged with 250 ml methylene chloride, and this resin extracted for 24
hours with a cycle time of 10 to 14 times per hour. The extractate was
then added to the K-D evaporator as described above for Container No. 1.
6. After all components of the sample were combined in the K-D
evaporator, the volume was reduced to a known, small volume (5 ml). This
sample was further evaporated or rediluted as required to obtain analyti-
cal responses within the ranges of the calibration curves for the various
analytes.
The samples were injected into a temperature-programmed capillary
column gas chromatograph with mass spectrometer (GC/MS) for identification
and quantification of analytes. The samples were first analyzed on GC/FID
to obtain approximate analyte concentrations to establish appropriate di-
lutions, if any, for mass spec analysis. The general procedure described
in EPA publication SW 846 was used for set up and calibration of the GC/MS
and compound identification performed by the data system with verification
by the analyst. Quantification of analytes was made by response factor
calculation relative to phenanthrene for the PNAs and to specific cali-
bration standards for pentachlorophenol and naphthalene.
4-8
-------
CHAPTER 5
RESULTS
The emission rates for a variety of organic compounds have been esti-
mated and are summarized in this section. The major parameters determin-
ing the calculated emisison rates are volumetric flow rate of exhaust gas
and pollutant concentration, calculated from various measurements. The
major elements of the measurement and their precision are discussed below.
Exhaust Gas Flow Rate - Vacuum Vents
The vacuum vent stack discharges the vapor from a condensate knock-
out tank which receives the exhaust from the process vacuum pumps. These
tanks are covered with a steel deck with a steel stack over the middle of
the tank. The rate of gas discharged is determined by the pressure in
tank and gas exits through stack and through cracks and holes in the deck
plating. The pulsations of the vacuum are somewhat damped by the volume
of the tanks, but the exhaust gas velocity varies in a pulsing manner.
A preliminary velocity traverse was conducted in each of the stacks, the
average velocity calculated, and a point of average velocity selected.
During sampling, the velocity head at this point was measured and assumed
to be average velocity. The velocity data herein reported represent the
average value of the velocity at the point over the sample period, and
were calculated with Equation 2-9 of EPA Method 2 (40 CFR Part 60, Appen-
dix A).
Normal operations at Wyckoff has three retorts operating at differ-
ent phases of the treating cycle and the vapor discharges from all three
venting to one knockout tank. For these tests, however, only 1 retort
was operated in order to obtain samples from 1 phase of the cycle and
thus the total gas flow was lower than normal. The resulting increase
in uncertainty as to flow rates was considered less important than ob-
taining a sample representative of the emission from one and only one
phase of the treating cycle. Table 5.1 summarizes the calculated stack
parameters. These flow rates reflect the system exhaust in the first
hours of vacuum on a charge, whether the final vacuum/cool-down or the
beginning of conditioning. Limited data taken with a vane anemometer
at the end of conditioning (i.e., after 36 hours of vacuum) on the creo-
sote system yield a gas velocity of 4.8 ft/sec or approximately 360 acfm,
which is slightly lower than the initial hours. This is expected as most
of the water and air have been removed from the logs and the gas discharge
probably represents the continuing volatilization of treating oil and air
inleakage caused by the system vacuum (22" Hg).
5-1
-------
Exhaust Gas Flow Rate - Retort Fugitives
The method employed to estimate the volume of gas discharged from
the retort caused by opening the doors yielded surprisingly reproducible
results. The flow rates were calculated by measuring the velocity of the
outflowing gas near the top center of the retort opening with a vane ane-
mometer, estimating the fraction of retort opening in each of three regi-
mens (in-flowing, out-flowing, and stagnant) and calculating a flow rate
as the product of velocity and discharge area. Table 5.2 summarizes the
measurements and resulting flow rates. These data represent the flow
rate while the retort is empty with door wide open, i.e., after the
treated load has been pulled, but before a new load is put in. When a
treated load is pulled, the volume occupied by the logs and trams is
replaced with ambient air and when a new charge is loaded, a volume of
air is displaced by the new load. The total retort volume is about 5,700
ft3 and a typical full load probably occupies 50-75% of the total volume.
The air drawn in with removal of a load can be considered as displaced when a
new load is charged. This amounts to 3,000-4,500 ft3 during a 2-5 minute
period. If the retort is open and empty for half an hour and is discharging
at a rate of 4,000 acfm, the total gas exhaused is 120,000 ft3 and the
volume displaced by changing loads is relatively insignificant (only 3-4%
of the total).
The major areas of uncertainly associated with these measurements
and results are estimation of the area of discharge and the uniformity of
the velocity across that area. The area estimation is probably within
+25% of the true value. The velocity measurements taken are reasonably
accurate (+_5%) but an uncertainty derives from whether the velocity at
the measured point is in fact the average bulk velocity of the exhaust
gas. Some basic heat transfer calculations suggest that 1x10° ft of
air are required to cool the retort from 180° to 80°F. If the retort
cools down in 2 hours, the flow rate would be 8,300 acfm which compares
favorably, given the nature and extent of the variables involved, with
measured values of 4,000-5,000 acfm.
Sampling Data
Tables 5.3 and 5.4 summarize the measured and calculated values for
the MM5 and fugitive sample collection. The calculation procedures are
routine and the equations of Method 5 are used. Example calculations are
included in Appendix D. Table 5.5a and 5.5b present the results of GC/MS
analysis of the samples. The results are expressed as total ug of the
analytes in the sample and reflect the instrumental value, any dilutions
or concentrations and calculation of total mass of analytes in the sample.
Data are presented for PNA compounds found in the sample from EPA's pri-
ority pollutant list and includes those specific compounds which were
specifically targeted for analysis (pentachlorophenol, naphthalene).
Emission Estimates
The data in tables 5.6 -5.9 are derived from the analysis results,
sampling parameters, and gas flow rate estimations. The mass emission
5-2
-------
rates should not be considered as representative of overall facility
emission; they are supplied to provide a reference for time
rate of discharge.
The fugitive emission rates are representative, within the limits
previously discussed, of short-term emission rate; process schedules,
actual work practices regarding open door and recharging, and treating
oil variation would need to be considered to establish overall emission
rates. The vacuum vent rates are more reliable and representative of
emission from the treating process; again, however, process operating
schedule, and work practices such time of conditioning need to be con-
sidered in extrapolating single retort data to the whole facility. Some
estimate of the overall emission rate can be made for the available data.
A typical treating cycle is listed below showing the duration of each
phase of this cycle.
Duration
Phase (hrs)
Conditioning
Pressure Treating
Expansion
Steam Cleaning
Final Vacuum
Fugi tive
48
1
3
2
1
1/2
Pressure (P) Discharge
or to
Vacuum (V) Atmosphere Comments
V
P
V
V
V
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Negligible
gas flow
Table 5.10 presents estimated emissions for one complete cycle of penta
and creosote treating. The rate given are based on the flow measurements
and concentration data previously discussed.
5-3
-------
TABLE 5. 1
FLOW RATE DATA
Average
Stack Temp.
Run
Date
Moisture
%
Velocity
ft/sec
Volumetric Flow
Rates
acfm
dscfm
WPV-MM5-1A
-1B
Avg
WPV-MM5-2A
-2B
Avg
WCV-MM5-1A
-1B
Avg
WCV-MM5-2A
-2B
Avg
7/29
7/29
7/31
7/31
7/31
7/31
8/1
8/1
152.4
152.3
152.4
145.8
145.3
145.6
131.5
131.2
131.4
145.4
145.3
145.4
26.9
27.9
27.2
21 .4
22.6
22.0
17.2
16.7
17.0
20.5
21.7
21 .1
12.2
12.2
12.2
11.5
11.8
11 .7
6.2
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
780
750
460
460
490
510
340
320
5-4
-------
TABLE 5.2
RETORT FUGITIVE FLOW RATES
Retort
D
Treating Oil
Date
Time
Average Velocity ft/min
(Range of Intermediate Velo-
cities)
Average Discharge Area, %
(Range)
Average Discharge Area, ft^
Average Discharge Gas Flow
Rate acfm
Creosote
7/26/85
1255-1355
302
(316-375)
37
(29-41)
16.4
4960
Creosote
7/31/85
1350-1420
313
(286-333)
30
(13-35)
13.3
4160
Penta
7/31/85
1157-1227
372
(400)
30
(22-35)
13.3
4950
5-5
-------
TABLE 5.3
MODIFIED METHOD 5 SAMPLING
Run ID
SAMPLING DATA
Meter Volume, acf
Meter Pressure (DH), in
H20
Meter Temp, °F
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg
Gamma
Condensate, ml
Area of Stack, ft2
DERIVED DATA
Meter Volume, dscf
Water Volume, scf
Moisture Content, %
Molecular Weight, Dry
Molecular Weight, Wet
Stack Velocity, ft/sec
Stack Temp, °F
Volumetric Flow Rate
- acfm
- dscfm
WCV
1A
52.666
1.02
90.3
29.9
1 .013
227.9
1.227
51.477
10.727
17.2
28.84
26.98
6.25
131 .3
460
342
WCV
2A
36.822
1.27
94.2
29.9
1 .013
196.1
1.227
35.759
9.230
20.5
28.84
26.62
6.27
145.4
462
319
WPV
1A
59.403
0.60
96.7
29.9
1 .007
445.8
1.069
56.996
20.984
26.9
28.84
25.92
12.20
152.4
783
493
WPv
2A
73.376
1 .56
85.2
29.9
1 .007
416.4
1.069
72.057
19.600
21.4
28.84
26.52
11.62
145.6
745
509
5-6
-------
TABLE 5.4
FUGITIVE EMISSION SAMPLING DATA
WPF-X WPF-X WCF-X WCF-X WCF-X
Run ID 1A 1B 1A 2A 2B
Meter Volume, liters 15.240 14.23 9.835 10.22 8.18
Meter Volume, acf 0.539 0.520 0.348 0.361 0.289
Meter Pressure, in. H20 1.00 1.20 1.00 0.97 1.21
Meter Temp, °F 83.6 79.8 86.1 81.3 77.9
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg 29.9 29.9 29.9 29.9 29.9
Gamma 0.951 0.955 0.951 0.951 0.955
Meter Volume, dscf 0.500 0.489 0.321 0.321 0.273
5-7
-------
TABLE 5.5a
VACUUM VENT SAMPLING ANALYSIS RESULTS
Total ug of Analyte
Creosote
Compound
Naphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Phenanthrene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Pyrene
pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Detection Limit
WCV
1A
2,500,000
2,400
3,600
1 ,400
ND
4,700
ND
ND
ND
1,000
WCV
2A
900,000
8,200
40,000
3,400
ND
25,000
ND
ND
ND
1,000
WCV
X-2
7200
ND
20
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
10
Penta
WPV
1A
2,000,000
ND
30,000
2,100
ND
8,400
ND
ND
ND
1,000
WPV
1A
1 ,000,000
ND
25,000
1,700
ND
9,800
ND
ND
ND
1,000
5-8
-------
TABLE 5. 5b
FUGITIVE SAMPLING ANALYSIS RESULTS
Total ug of Analyte
Compound
Naphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Phenanthrene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Pyrene
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
Detection Limit
WPF
1A
50
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
10
WPF
1B
200
ND
10
10
ND
20
ND
600
ND
10
WCF
1A
3,000
ND
2,200
640
300
740
ND
ND
100
10
WCF
2A
11 ,070
90
1,900
300
40
580
20
ND
100
10
WCV
2B
1,200
60
1,500
130
ND
340
ND
ND
20
10
5-9
-------
TABLE 5.6a
EMISSION RATES
PROCESS CYCLE - CREOSOTE CONDITIONING (INITIAL VACUUM)
EXHAUST GAS FLOW RATE - 342 dscfm
Compound
Naphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Phenanthrene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Pyrene
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
#/dscf
107 x 10"6
0.103 x
0.154 x
0.060 x
<0.043 x
0.201 x
<0.043 x
<0.043 x
<0.043 x
10~6
10~6
10~6
10~6
10~6
10~6
10~6
10-6
Emissions
ppmv
323
0.26
0.39
0.13
<0.08
0.47
<0.08
<0.06
<0.09
#/hour
2.20
0.0021
0.0032
0.0012
<0.0009
0.0041
<0.0009
<0.0009
<0.0009
5-10
-------
TABLE 5.6b
EMISSION RATES
PROCESS CYCLE - CREOSOTE COOL-DOWN (FINAL VACUUM)
EXHAUST GAS FLOW RATE, 319 dscfm
Emissions
Compound
Naphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Phenanthrene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Pyrene
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
#/dscf
55.5 x 10~6
0
2
0
<0
1
<0
<0
<0
.506 x
.47 x
.210 x
.062 x
.54 x
.062 x
.062 x
.062 x
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
-6
-6
-6
-6
-6
-6
-6
-6
ppmv
1
1
6
0
<0
3
<0
<0
<0
68
.29
.19
.46
.12
.59
.12
.09
.13
#/hour
1
0
0
0
<0
0
<0
<0
<0
.06
.0097
.0472
.0040
.0012
.0295
.0012
.0012
.0012
5-11
-------
TABLE 5.7a
EMISSION RATES
PROCESS CYCLE - PENTA CONDITIONING (INITIAL VACUUM)
EXHAUST GAS FLOW RATE, 493 dscfm
Compound
Naphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Phenanthrene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Pyrene
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
#/dscf
77.4 x 1
<0.039 x
1 .16 x
0.081 x
<0.039 x
0.325 x
<0.039 x
<0.039 x
<0.039 x
I0~6
10~6
10~6
io-6
10~6
10~6
10~6
10~6
10~6
Emissions
ppmv
234
<0.10
2.91
0.18
<0.07
0.76
<0.07
<0.06
<0.08
#/hour
2.29
<0.0011
0.0343
0.0024
<0.0011
0.0096
<0.0011
<0.001 1
<0.001 1
5-12
-------
TABLE 5.7b
EMISSION RATES
PROCESS CYCLE - PENTA COOL DOWN (FINAL VACUUM)
EXHAUST GAS FLOW RATE, 493 dscfm
Compound
Naphthalene
Acenaphthalene
Acenaphthene
Phenanthrene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Pyrene
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
#/dscf
30.6 x 1
<0.031 x
0.765 x
0.052 x
<0.031- x
0.300 x
<0.031 x
<0.031 x
<0.031 x
I0~6
10~6
10~6
10~6
10~6
10~6
10~6
10~6
10~6
Emissions
ppmv
92.4
<0.08
1.92
0.11
<0.06
0.70
<0.06
<0.04
<0.07
#/hour
0.93
<0.0009
0.0234
0.0016
<0.0009
0.0092
<0.0009
<0.0009
<0.0009
5-13
-------
TABLE 5.8
PROCESS CYCLE - CREOSOTE FUGITIVE
EXHAUST GAS FLOW RATE, approximately 3800 dscfm
Emissions
Compound Sample
Naphthalene
Acenaphthalene
Acenaphthene
Phenanthrene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Pyrene
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
#/dscf
72
9
0
0
12
12
1
1
0
<0
3
2
0
<0
<0
<0
<0
0
.4
.69
.59
.49
.4
.1
.96
.05
.26
.08
.79
.75
.13
.081
.065
.081
.65
.16
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
-6
—6
-6
-6
-6
"6
-6
-6
-6
-6
-6
-6
-6
-6
-6
-6
-6
-6
ppmv
219
29.
1 .
1.
31 .
30.
4.
2.
0.
<0.
8.
6.
0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
1 .
0.
3
5
2
2
4
3
3
50
15
8
4
25
15
10
12
4
35
#/hour
16
2
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
<0
0
0
0
<0
<0
<0
0
0
.5
.21
.134
.111
.83
.76
.447
.239
.060
.018
.865
.626
.030
.018
.015
.018
.149
.037
5-14
-------
TABLE 5.9
EMISSION RATES
PROCESS CYCLE - PENTA FUGITIVE
EXHAUST GAS FLOW RATE, approximately 4500 dscfm
Emissions
Compound
Naphthalene
Acenaphthalene
Acenaphthene
Phenanthrene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Pyrene
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
#/dscf
0
<0
0
0
<0
0
<0
2
<0
.900 x
.045 x
.045 x
.045 x
.045 x
.090 x
.045 x
.71 x
.045 x
1
1
0
0
10
10
1
0
10
1
1
1
0
0
0
-6
-6
-6
-6
-6
-6
-6
-6
-6
ppmv
2
<0
0
0
<0
0
<0
3
<0
.7
.11
.11
.10
.09
.21
.09
.9
.1
ft/hour
0
<0
0
0
<0
0
<0
0
<0
.24
.01
.01
.01
.01
2
2
2
2
.024
.01
.72
.01
2
2
5-15
-------
TABLE 5.1 Oa
TOTAL CREOSOTE CYCLE EMISSIONS
(LB/HR)
EMISSIONS (LB/HR)
COMPOUND
Naphthalene
Acenaphthalene
Acenaphthene
Phenanthrene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Pyrene
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
CONDITIONING
(48 HR)
106
0.101
0.154
0.0576
<0.0432a
0.197
<0.0432
<0.0432
<0.0432
FINAL
(1 HR)
1 .06
0.0097
0.0472
0.004
<0.0012
0.0295
<0.0012
<0.0012
<0.0012
FUGITIVE
(1/2 HR)
4.68
0.613
1 .40
0.172
0.0195
0.373
0.012
0.0083
<0.0465
CYCLE
TOTAL
(56 HR)
111
0.172
1 .60
0.233
<0.0639
0.599
<0.0564
<0.0527
<0.0477
5-16
-------
TABLE 5.1 Ob.
TOTAL PENTA CYCLE EMISSIONS
(LB/HR)
EMISSIONS (LB/HR)
COMPOUND
Naphthalene
Acenaphthalene
Acenaphthene
Phenanthrene
F luoranthene
Fluorene
Pyrene
Pentachlorophenol
Anthracene
CONDITIONING
(48 HR)
110
<0.0528
1 .65
0.115
<0.0528
0.461
<0.0528
<0.0528
<0.0528
FINAL
(1 HR)
0.930
<0.0009
1 .920
0.1 10
<0.0009
0.0092
<0.0009
<0.0009
<0.0009
FUGITIVE
(1/2 HR)
0.120
<0.006
0.006
0.006
<0.006
0.012
<0.006
0.360
<0.006
CYCLE
TOTAL
(56 HR)
111
<0.0597
3.57
0.231
<0.597
0.482
<0.0597
<0.414
<0.0597
a < indicates values calculated lower limit of detection.
5-17
-------
APPENDIX A
PROCESS DATA RECORDS
-------
-------
CM ,
-------
»//;/-•/'•-/
////%••'•: •/://////////
V
*-o
t4AKT
-------
CTW XT 0. C,0'-(. />',\
-------
-------
-------
C>
-------
;\\ \ \ V
/ - / /'
' / / /
/ / A ,
) _ - - "TN ( '
NI- i c i< \ 1 J V'
RT : 7 j '5, i
-------
J-»***1'
'XI
••\>v. \ >
•A,,'. \ - \
|P^/^'\
w/M$w\.',^>
//////w;w'/-.. -v
,'.O
I ••• ' ' I ,'' I
• 2' -: ! :oHiLl
uti V'^^'iuv.1'
,\\\\\\\\\V.\M.\\VV.---.
\\\\\\\\\\'','Vv.\\\\'-1
rfte ^y^ >
v»:u^;^,-'^
fefe\y.vv-:\
O \\ ^°,V\'' r>.
rj\\\ \»'\' \ 'r> v , .
ov
•f/
K
1 .•• ' K\ 'v;-
- 1 ' •l.^'\'A,Av
/•]'L--'h-.l4<.^
1 -"f i ' ' J 'V
-------
APPENDIX B
FIELD DATA
-------
Plant
Date
FIELD DATA
Sampling Location
Sample Type ^
Run Number _
Operator
Ambient Temperature
Barometric Pressure
Static Pressure (pfl)
Filter Humber(s)
Pretest Leak Rate - QIC cfm 0
Pretest Pi tot Leak Check ^
Pretest Orsat Leak Check ""
in. llg
Probe Length and Type
Pitot Tube I.D. No.
Nozzle I.D.
Assumed Moisture, %
Temp. Readout S/N 1/oST
Meter Box Number
Meter llg •
C Factor •—
Meter Gamma O.'
Heater Box Setting
Read and Record all Data Every
Minutes
Schematic of
Traverse Point Layout
Post Test Leak Rate ** —~ cfra 0
Post Test Pltot Leak Check —
Post Teat Orsat Leak Check
in. llg
Traverse
Point
Number
yj/^
/Clock
Sampling / Time
Time, /(24-hour
(min) / clock)
O 1 \^?
s i ^<;i
VO / (IS?
K / lOo-3
-2A3 / ('iO?'
^5 / io/3
3o / ni?
-3i / (-31^
/
31 /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
UWs
Gas Meter
Reading
tv I ft
"m"
SV«\3C
60- \ o
6i-^0
(>^•l>$
L^o
b^-10
tS.-JH
-7. £-7$
-, m f f
-/ •
6- ^ ^
S ^-H-i^
Ho ad { P 1
•IV«U % E^JI j
in* H O
CJ-1?
*?
Vf?
M--?
M-^
^^
^^
STO>
D^P
Orifice Pres.
Differential
( H) in. II 50
Desired
•
w— - -
—
• —
—
— —
^---
- -cvl
Actual
(•»5
(.<$
\-~L-
v.vS
J.-iS
1-^
M$
TE °F
'"in
"L'B
-L^
7^
^C1
11
1>^
11
Outlet
(Tm t) °F
•"out
Z^
I*?
^?
30
31
-32-
33
S'^.i-^
Pump
Vacuum
in. llg
0
o
i9
O
O
0
Sample
Box Temp.
Filter
Temp. °F
•
--—
--
•
—
—
—
Im-
pinger
Temp.
OF
-
-------
FIELD DATA
Plant
Date
Sampling Location
Sample Type
Run Number
Operator
CF -
Ambient Temperature
Barometric Pressure
Static Pressure (PB)
Filter Number(s)
Pretest Leak Rate - QV-~ cfm 8
Pretest Pitot Leak Check —
Pretest Orsat Leak Check —
in. llg
r
Probe Length and Type
Pltot Tube I.D. No. _
Nozzle I.D. —
Assumed Moisture, % —'
Temp. Readout S/N U°ST
Meter Box Number i/O-s'T
Meter llg
C Factor —
Meter Gamma Q.^ $ (
Heater Box Setting
Reference/ip •-
Read and Record all Data Every ^ Minutes
Schematic of
Traverse Point Layout
Post Test Leak Rate ** .— cfm 6
Post Test Pitot Leak Check —
Post Test Orsat Leak Check
in. llg
Traverse
Point
Number
Vp
'
/Clock
Sampling / Time
Time, /(24-hour
(min) / clock)
O / )?^ H?
S / 12,$3
(v / \-L<;~
-------
FIELD DATA
Plant
Date
Samplirig Location
Sample Type
Run Number
Operator
Ambient Temperature ^ Q
Barometric Pressure
Static Pressure (Ps)
Filter Number(s)
Pretest Leak Rate = cfm @
Pretest Pitot Leak Check
Pretest Orsat Leak Check
Read and Record all Data Every
in. Hg
Probe Length and Type
.Pitot Tube I.D. Ho. _
Nozfel*
I.fe.
Assumed Moiatnrw %
temp.. Readout »/N __
-Meter Box Number
Meter W9 __
C Factor _
Meter Gamma __^___
Heater Box Setting _
Reference.
Minutes
Schematic of
Traverse Point Layout
Post Teat toak Rate » _ «fw
Post *e*% Pitot Laurie Ctattft _
tost lest Orsat I*afc Check
In.
"• )
Traverse
Point
Number
/Clock
Sampling / Time
Time, /(24-hour
(min) / clock)
o / ///&
^r / I/if
/ o, -b / //2,$-
/fe- ^ / /
•23^/o,«///3?
•ik /
/(^ / ///^
ZO / /us*.
25" / //S-/
36 / //5-JF
i^<9 / /T-^
y / APflT
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
Gas Meter
Reading
(vm) ft3
4/*£&3
/^^d<^
49,/f^r-o
6?-/y
0
^36^ <
?/- s~&
•Z-p'Yf
^-yc>
Jt'1
^i?L?>(0
SJ_
\*P
\\A' ^'i
1 i> L
Ll^C/S
C'- '
Velocity
Head ( Pg )
in. H20
P " TOR
CS7W7
^K^
_ ^ ^(^
>x-^ - •
Orifice Pres^
Differential
( H) in. H20
Desired
«&-
q*
i
Y^
^/^
Ysr
w
1/8T
C/^
V&
i
i-l't
Actual
C5O/L.
Stack
Temp.
^ •'
/\
C£-
t- 1
Vs-/
A^/
2-iV
^
/ j
^^
8-3
V
Dry Gas Meter Te^ck.
Inlet '-
^
^Sw^
^?^oc
^Scr-
t
2-Cp :
*fr
^9-
z-g- ;
^^
c9L^-
3o
j J *
^^
^
S*\ ¥
r YO •
'-J,clA/
y i
••»•
Outlet
i*-w»*
j
•'
.•
*
;
Punp
VacuuM
in. Hg
j,~i -
A 2,
,
A2-
/--^
/^ y
/-^ S- '
A/^-
/5?«!?
/.z6 -
1^
'I
Sanple
Box Tenp.
Filter j
Temp. °F
Im-
pinger
Temp*
•F
!
:
.'
-------
FIELD DATA
Plant \j[
Date
J^C lC
v / A
/\ 1 f\
Operator
Ambient Temperature
Barometric Pressure
Static Pressure (Pa)
Filter Mumber(s)
Pretest Leak Rate - cfm 8 in. llg
Pretest Pitot Leak Check
Pretest Orsat Leak Check
Read and Record all Data Every Minutes
Probe Length and Type
Pitot Tube I.D. No. _
Nozzle
I.D.
Assumed Moisture, %
Temp. Readout S/N
Meter Box Number
Meter llg
C Factor
V O^T
Meter Gamma
Heater Box Setting
Reference
Schematic of
Traverse Point Layout
Post Test Leak Rate « cfra
Post Test Pitot Leak Check
Post Test Orsat Leak Check
in. llg
Traverse
Point
Number
!
/Clock
Sampling / Time
Time, /(24-hour
(tntn) / clock)
0 / if/I-
5- / ^(•2~(
\C&Y> 1 IC2.C-
/$ /
4^j*jeuT*f
lC / //rsr
2J$ 1 //Y?
3S- / f/s-'y
2>^ / ft*r*7
*/0 / ,-id>*}
3-0 / ,£,<}
[>c> 1 /aa6)
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
Gas Meter
Reading
-
/ l
r G
^)'c 7 /
Velocity
Head ( Pa )
in. II20
^irr5
75^
K^
Cf^W^
*$?' *
Outlet
(Tm } °F
out
,/
A
—
pWr
Vacuum
i7!!. Hg
/~o
0,?
/'^
^-?
S>'7
-
^r^
A^
A&
/-*•
/ o
[ '
Sample
Box Temp.
Filter
Temp. °F
Im-
pinger
Temp.
op
-------
Plant
Date
(JJ
Sampling Location
Sample Type
Run Number • ''_
Operator
A / / for
J>
a - F x - ,3 ft
Ambient Temperature
Barometric pressure
Static Pressure (P8V
Filter Number(s)
FIELD DATA
Pretest Leak.Rate - cfm 0 ' ' in. Hg
Pretest Pitot Leak Check :
Pretest Orsat Leak Check _. . .
Read and Record all Data Every _ Minutes
Schematic) of
Traverse Point Layout
Probe Length and Type
Pi tot Tube I.D. No.
Nozzle
I.D.
Assumed Moisture, %
Temp. Readout S/N _
Meter Box Number
Meter H0
C Factor •' • •
Meter Gamma
Heater Box Setting
Reference,
•i-jo ST °C_
Post Test Leak Rate **. cfm §
Post Test Pitot Leak Check •_
Post Test Orsat Leak Check
in. Hg
Traverse
Point
Number
/Clock
Sampling / Time
Time, /(24-hour
(min) / clock)
£> / /3?-4
& 1 (3^3
fO 1 / 3. Y?"
a-6 / 7 3s'9-
^-ST' / ffy<>'2rr
( ^d 1 / n.
Actual
/i -O^
f/y1"
V %
4*&.
^%
*f%
^->T
57-
..iCL
ir\
Stack
Temp.
(To)
>?
?2
7^ .
? ^
.y-
Qsf-^,
v/
Qo
Dry Gas 'Meter Temp.
Inlet
(Tm ) >
*n tfj-
5^
^T"
3*5~~
. 2-fc •
'2JQ.
^?-.
Ul3-<^'
/t^^xl
^
3'? /I
i
Outlet
(Tm . ) °F
out •
•£.
$-.9-
£> fUQ Pp&i
G^J
Pump
in. Hg
/.-"2—
L'"*—
h"2'
/T~l~
^•L5"
\~t&
> y
Sample
Box Temp.
Filter
Temp. °F
• T~ O F
. -
Im-
pinge r
Temp.
°F
,
.
-------
Plant
Date
FIELD DATA
Sampling Location
Sample Type
Run Number u^'
Operator
2>
Ambient Temperature.
Barometric Pressure
Static Pressure (Pa)
Filter Number(s)
3 o-
cfm 8
In. llg
Pretest Leak Rate - ._•—•-—
Pretest Pltot Leak Check
Pretest Orsat Leak Check —__.
Read and Record all Data Every Minutes
Schematic of
Traverse Point Layout
Probe Length .and Type
Pltot Tube I.D. No. _
Nozzle
I.D.
Assumed Moisture, %
Temp. Readout S/N
Meter Box Number
Meter II0 ,
C Factor •__
Meter Gamma '.
Heater Box Setting
Reference^vP
yy
Post Test Leak Rate .** cfra
Post Test. Pi tot Leak Check
Post Test Orsat Leak Check •.-
In. llg
Traverse
Point
Number
/Clock
Sampling / Time-
Time, /(24-hour
(mln) / clock)
6 / ?^v7-
& / /3S3
10 / -/Sy?-
/C^ / , Vs-3
^ O / t 'Si'T-'
^5T / /YCT-
"b><^> / (O 3
o • •
>•
-n^jC'P'
l}>-r •
Orifice Pres.
Differential
( H) In. II 50
Desired
vV
•
rf-jPusr
Actual
«/#
Y5^
i/S
^ ^
v'S-
^«. -
v-fc
/^ /
(
/ •
,^
^\ D
Stack
Temp.
\
/?-y7
"*"
."
Dry Gas Meter Temp.
Inlet
(T,^, -F
75T
.^S" .
150
^0
•52^
^3
«V
•s y-'
-I *}•
^i/y
Outlet
(Tm ) »F
out
7^
T-S'
Sro
•§• c) -
.•»7- '
£ 3
^H
•&-!T
"
Pump
Vacuum
In. llg
f-*
)- &
O.*l$~
0..95"
/-«»
0,t5~
„«•
^'^r
Sample
Box. Temp.
Filter
Temp. °F
- -
:Im-
plnger
Temp.
°F
-------
s- *
Plant
Date
14-
yea
FIELD DATA
Sampling Location
Sample Type
Run Number _
Operator
j^?yvy<77v-
- A\ A S -
Ambient Temperature
Barometric, Pressure
Static PijPlfsure (Pfl)
Filt«rMpumber(s)
Pretas'Leak Rate
Pretest Pitot Leak Check
Pretest Orsat Leak Check
Read and Record all Data Every
cfm i
in. Hg
Probe Length and Type
Pi tot Tube I.D. Ho. _
Nozzle
I.D.
Assumed Moisture, %
Temp. Readout S/N _
Meter Box Number
Meter llg
C Factor _^
Meter Gamma
Heater Box Setting
Reference ,
/-
Minutes
Schematic of
Traverse Point Layout
Post Test Leak Rate **W)Q^cfn 9
Post Test Pitot Leak Check
Post Test Orsat Leak Check
in. Hg
Traverse
Point
Number
/Clock
Sampling / Time
Time, /<24-hour
(roin) / clock)
Gas Meter
Reading
IV «*
3
Velocity
Head ( Ps
in. II 00
Orifice Pres.
Differential
( H) in. II20
Desired Actual
Stack
Temp.
-*i ^.
4 5.
f? /
7.S*
s /
J^_
JoJL
/0.0-
0,0
ft*/
9
&M-
n
^d
ZI
J2
20
2&.
20.
-------
SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Plant:
Date:
Sampling Location:
Sample Type: /VlM-$
Run Number:
Sample Box Number:
Clean-up Man:
Job Number: ^^____
Comments:
FRONT HALF
Filter Number:
Description of Filter:
MOISTURE
Impingers
Final Volume:
Initial Volume:
Net Volume:
Total H2O:
Silica Gel
Final Volume:
Initial Volume
Net Volume
Total Moisture:
b\> ml
C** ml (*
ml
ml ml
50 ml ml
ml ml
H IZ~
H G b . 5 g
r3M-."l g %,o:
g
g g
liO g g
g -2*7/0 g
0-^*^ ^/Y^^
linger Catch:
-------
FIELD DATA
Sampling Locatio _
Sample Type A A\
Run Number
Operator
Ambient Temperature
Barometric Pressure
Static Pressure (Pa
Filter Number(s)
Pretest
Leak Rate • tf-tfof'cln 9
Pretest Pitot Leak Check
Pretest Orsat Leak Check
in. Hg
Probe Length and Type
Pitot Tube I.D. No. _
Nozzle
I.D.
Assumed Moisture, %
Temp. Readout S/N
Meter Box Number
Meter Hg j
C Factor
Meter Gamma
Heater Box Setting
Reference
Read and Record all Data Every
Minutes
Schematia of
Traverse Point Layout
Post Test Leak Rate « ^ cfm 9
Post Test Pitot Leak Check
Post Test Oraat Leak Check
in. Hg
*,,**. *.r*»-i d) o*w-*«* & @>
Traverse
Point
Number
i\!^
i
/Clock
Sampling / Time
Time, /(24-hour
(tnln) / clock)
0 / /Z~3£>
. /S~ //$-'•< *r
V;- / I3oo
•itr l f3is~
(o& / /3s^
j~>- I /w^—
90 / woo
IDS' //4//
/v&.o
/s~& «*W
A.OA
. 0^>>
v /
Is f
S(\J!\
i \i
bv
Velocity
Head ( Pa)
in. H 2O
O-C''^
«?-o >r
O'OtfO
& . o3^-
o-^3s-
d>.o ^.S-~
^
<5?
C A'V
o/x
Orifice Pres.
Differential
( H) in. II 2O
Desired
*/*%
(3-9-C'
c»,-?id
o^fCi
^-?-c
^•?^
^?.?c
<5.>C>
_f
Goblet
(T./V) »F
'rout
<^a
^^
'^0
^-<9
6-^-
?-3
*t
(^
Pump
Vacuum
in. Hg
JT
^
7
^ '/2_
/2-
/y^L.
) (*'/-£.
' i
^
6 XT
&<**
t,3-
^ 1
-------
SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Plant: o
Date:
Sampling Location: 'pi^sTfrv., \Jc^t^. Ut/—Q
Sample Type:
Run Number: W'U" AW*-5 I -
Sample Box Number:
Clean-up Man:
Job Number:
Comments:
FRONT HALF
Filter Number:
Description of Filter:
MOISTURE
Impingers
6H
Final Volume: ° l ^ ml ml ml
Initial Volume: yoo ml ( oo ml ml
Net Volume: ml ml ml
Total H20:
Silica Gel
Final Volume: 3^-> •> g g g
Initial Volume 7. 5" I* O g Z.Z^»"2^ g g
Net Volume g g X^ ' /* g
Total Moisture:
Description of Impinger Catch:
-------
FIELD DATA
Plant
Date
Sampling Location
Sample Type
Run Number
Operator
Ambient Temperature
Barometric Pressure
Static Pressure (PB)
Filter Number(s)
Pretest Leak Rate •<3.oO<^,cfm @
Pretest Pi tot Leak Check
Pretest Orsat Leak Check
in. Hg
Probe Length and Type
Pitot Tube I.D. No. _
Nozzle I .to*
Assumed Moisture,
Temp. Haattottt 5/H
Meter Box Humfoet ^
Meter He
C Paotor
Meter Gamma
Beaker Box Setting
Reference
(.00
Read and Record all Data Every
Minutes
Schematic of
Traverse Point Layout
tost float leak Rate
Post Test Mtot Leak Check
Podt lest Qrsat Leak Check
in. ttg
-------
SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Plant:
Date:
h>( /
Sampling Location: V/W .
Sample Type: A^/W S
Run Number: W? - I/
Sample Box Number:
Clean-up Man:
Job Number:
Comments:
FRONT HALF
Filter Number:
Description of Filter:
MOISTURE
Impingers
Final Volume:
Initial Volume:
Net Volume:
Total H20:
Silica Gel
Final Volume:
Initial Volume
Net Volume
Total Moisture:
Description of Impinger Catch:
b o > mi
( •*"£> ml •, '-n-:'
ml
ml
ml
ml
ml
ml
ml
•2>«S>"~
•ov?,\j g
*? / <-/
> / ^ i g
^// (* <• ^
-------
FIELD DATA
Plant ULJ^tLfLO^ " Probe Length and Type ^7
Date -^ /!• j / & V
Sampling Location ft^-^-^t- L/,-+-c_ l/v~-— —
Sample Type y-j ^-\ £•
Run Number i4j p \J - ^
Operator
c— _ -z- /^
> — *• t_j
JS f3>
Ambient Temperature ^,~i °
Barometric Pressure ^ (5 r
Static Pressure (Pff)
Filter Number(s)
Pretest Leak Rate -<2_££2 c^m * ) ">_ ^n' H9
Pretest Pitot Leak Check
Pretest Orsat Leak Check
Read and Record all Data Every Minutes
Traverse
Point
Number
i
L ,
1
/Clock
Sampling / Time
Time, /(24-hour
(rain) / clock)
O / O^^-i-
- /(• 1 0952-
•)/-> 1 <9<7$"l,
5<3 / o°i z_
15~C?~ / /Of ~*-
£> O / tc,~L,~t^-
^ O 1 IO 3 2—
frc) 1 /& y*&
qo 1 1& $^
/GO / j fOZs
/
1
1
1
1
1
f
1
1
1
1
/
Gas Meter
Reading
& -7_.
/*/ 3-. 3>
.20/- /
2-O'S
7-1 '?-
^JL 5 ^
Z3 1 . 1 1»1
(I/
V
^ /
-4^/
73 /
XciS,
v\
£)•
T
Pitot Tube I.D. No.
Nozs
Assi
Tern]
Met<
Met<
C Fi
Met*
Heal
Reft
Post
Schematic of Post
Traverse Point Layout Post
Velocity
Head ( Pa)
in. H20
O,o^O
fy - O H'ci)
6> cs(fr
0- £/£>
&- o ~-5>s>~
6 .0 80
o ,. J "
0.0 30
^-fop
/ ^
fJS
y'A
V
'
Orifice Pres.
Differential
( H) in. H20
Desired
i ^_o
AQo
/ - ^
1- 9-°
/, ^d
le^-O
(-JQ
[- 9-c^
( " f~&
/ - >c)
- 1 vT>
*Jt)
\x '
^
Actual
Tt-^J
Stack
Temp.
(T8)
op
t^'i
1 *?' S~"
/5-
Ha /- 1~&&
jo tor
sr Gamma /, ^/ 3
ber Box Setting
»rence ^p
t Test Leak Rate «* p|C cfm,0 2-^ ^n« "9
; Test Pitot Leak Check'*'
t Test Orsat Leak Check
^^^
Dry Gas Meter Temp.
Inlet
(T ) °F
*&S
*?O
c?T__^
9 3
£3 Q—" ~
^/ v^f^
9^"
*7 #
/ 0 O
99
Ab\'L
7
Tv
Outlet
f T 1 °F
"out"
&> tf
f- 9
^/^
^ c/
/
^z—
^S
<£,
fc 1
^<^
^ £,
-------
SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Plant:
Date:
Sampling Location:
Sample Type: /*.
Run Number: V? ' V -
Sample Box Number:
Clean-up Man: ^
Job Number:
Comments:
FRONT HALF
Filter Number:
u.
Description of Filter:
MOISTURE
Impingers
Final Volume:
Initial Volume:
Net Volume:
Total H2O:
Silica Gel
Final Volume: ^00-0
fa^u ml
1 "^ ml i ^
ml
ml
) ml
ml
ml
ml
ml
I^-O
Initial Volume Z^ ? g ^S: V# g g
Net Volume g g g
Total Moisture: 2-£
Description of Impinger Catch:
-------
Plant
Date.
FIELD DATA
Sampling Location
Sample Type _
Run Number _
Operator _ .
Ambient Temperature
Barometric Pressure
Static Pressure (P8)
Filter Number (s)
Pretest Leak Rate •= 0
-------
SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Plant:
Date:
Sampling Location:
Sample Type: /A ^ S
Run Number: W^-V/ - A-A^S - j A
Sample Box Number:
Clean-up Man: »*•
Job Number: _______
Comments:
FRONT HALF
Filter Number:
Description of Filter:
MOISTURE
Impingers
Final Volume:
Initial Volume:
Net Volume:
Total H2O:
Silica Gel
Final Volume:
Initial Volume
Net Volume
Total Moisture:
> ^ ml
l'~sr"o nj. 1 ^
ml
ml ml
ml ml
ml ml
140
j V. C- v ^ «
"LM-0'0! g TT
g
g g
"3-7 g g
g 3 > '7 g
3^>9 5.^-^9
dnger Catch:
-------
FIELD DATA
Sampling Localtion
Sample Type M/'lfi
Run Number
Operator
Ambient Temperature -fQ
Barometric Pressure
Static Pressure (P8) "f^ < S
Filter Number(s) "'
Pretest Leak Rate = $(00{ocfm @ [<^ in. Hg
Pretest Pitot Leak Check
Pretest Orsat Leak Check
Probe Langth and Type
Pi tot Tube I.D. Mo. __
Nozzle I.D»
Assumedr Moisture,
temp. Readout S/H
Meter Box ttomher
Meter «0 ..
C
Z0(0- f V07 9
Factor
Heter Gamma
Heater Box Setting
Reference AP _ .
Read and Record all Data Every
Minutes
Schematic of
Traverse Point Layout
0
Poet Vest faak Rate •&,&& cf«t
fast Test Wtot Leak Check ^
Post feat Orsat tealt Check
tn« ttg
•f
Traverse
Point
Number
/Clock
Sampling / Time
Time, /(24-hour
(min) / clock)
Gas Meter
Reading
(V ) ft3
^T»i
Velocity
Head ( P8)
in. H0
Orifice Pres.
Differential
( H) in. ttjO
Desired
Actual
Stack
Temp*
(T8J
°F
Dry Gas Meter
tnlet
tlet
Puap
Vacuim
in. fig
Saaple
BoX Tenp.
Filter
Tenp. °F
JJB-
pinger
Tenp.
op
f)
3&L
0,0
-5
6?
10
0.0 (
. n
0,010
HO
O
/
n.nio
O.dio
fa
±
7 /
z-
6.3
0,010
/
m.
*n
*
tr
-------
SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Plant:
Date: 1 I
Sampling Location:
Sample Type:
Run Number: V O - 17 -
Sample Box Number:
Clean-up Man:
Job Number:
Comments:
FRONT HALF
Filter Number:
Description of Filter:
MOISTURE
Impingers
Final Volume:
Initial Volume:
Net Volume:
Total H20:
Silica Gel
Final Volume:
Initial Volume
Net Volume
Total Moisture:
> l ml
_i ) £^~O
1 <3~& uLL *
ml
ml
ml
ml
ml
ml
ml
/ 7-<3
*?( >•? g
"Z-fh?)' g "t^-o(v.
g
g
•f g
g 1?
g
g
)'3 g
3-S/tf l°t
-------
FIELD DATA
Plant
Date
Sampling Location
Sample Type _
Run Number
Operator
Cfa»~c
Ambient Temperature
Barometria Pressure
Static Pressure (PB)
Filter Number(a)
o
Pretest Leak Rate - _ cfm 6
Pretest Pitot Leak Check
Pretest Orsat Leak Check
Read and Record all Data Every
in. Hg
Probe Length and Type
Pitot Tube I.D. Ho. _
Nozzle I.D.
Assumed Moisture, %
Temp. Readout S/N
Meter Box Number
Meter llfl
C Factor _^
Meter Gamma t
Heater Box Setting
Reference ,
Minutes
Schematic of
Traverse Point Layout
Post Test Leak Rate « cfm 6
Post Test Pitot Leak Check
Post Test Orsat Leak Check
in. Hg
id/H
Traverse
POOTt
Camber
%&£-
~;?f3
\W
,a^
/
/
/ \
O^A
*
t
/Clock
Sampling / Time
Time, /(24-hour
(min) / clock)
o 1 o-z*%
q / ojf/2
in / fiViy
;IS / f"K?3&
30 1 f*q-3&
1
1
1
1
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
Gas Meter
Reading
62-
l/o'fio
?//^y
^/// 'fa
HiKZl
'
— -"
(
s^'V ^
,.(
5- / '
f^
0'^
/-lusnfn
"Verkactvy
H€ad ( Ps)
in. II 20
J~&
1.0
/), q
1.0
Sample
Box Temp.
Filter
Temp. °F
Im-
pinge r
Temp.
°F
-------
Plant
Date
FIELD DATA
Sampling Location
Sample Type
Run Number
Operator
Ambient Temperature
Barometric Pressure
Static Pressure (Pg)
Filter Number(s)
-30
Pretest Leak Rate =ltQff'fcfm § Jj, in. Hg
Pretest Pitot Leak Check
Pretest Orsat Leak Check
Read and Record all Data Every
Minutes
Schematic of
Traverse Point Layout
Probe Length and Type
Pitot Tube !.*>» Mo. ^
Nozzle I.D. ""
Aasuned Moisture, ft
Temp. Readout S/it
Meter Box Number
Meter «•- /..<
C Facto* '^
.'Meter Gamma /, 0
Heatet Box Setting _
Reference,
Post Wit I*ak Rate •
Post *eat Pitot Leak Check
Post Test Orsat Leak €h«ck
Traverse
Point
Number
/Clock
Sampling / Time
Time, /(24-hour
(min) / clock)
Gas Meter
Readi ng
(V ) ft
3
Velocity
Head ( Ps )
in. H0
Orifice Pres.
Differential
( H) in. H2O
Desired Actual
Stack
Temp.
Dry Oaa Meter Tej»p
Inlet
Pump
Vacuum
in. Hg
Sample
Box Temp.
Filter
Temp. «P
pinger
Teap*
n
d
/ iD
TO
OS
0,0)0
/
£
I.Zo
0,0/0
^
0,010
o.
H^
&
SO
c 6 / y^^D
0,010
wo
3-0
_ZL
£:
i, »^'
-------
SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Plant:
Date: _*J_L f 5
Sampling Location: L/&-<^
Sample Type: AV tf*-
Run Number: \JjC^
Sample Box Number: —
Clean-up Man:
Job Number:
Comments:
FRONT HALF
Filter Number:
Description of Filter:
MOISTURE
Impingers
Final Volume:
Initial Volume:
Net Volume:
Total H2O:
Silica Gel
Final Volume:
Initial Volume
Net Volume
Total Moisture:
Description of Impinger Catch:
^lu ml
( ~<^~c. ml i <37i
ml
ml
ml
ml
ml
ml
ml
HO
T" 2" '• g g g
•7/50 . C q -iZt
g
^'f g
g G
g
13^ g
2-l2>'G
-------
FIELD DATA
3.3-0
ASf
P9-I
Plant ** ;.. • ( <^ Gtf/* Probe Length and Type -^
Date ^K / / ^J*"
Sampling Location ^F?o*fe> I/Ac. C/cr*^"
Sample Type ^/^ C^ S~
Run Number LjJCL \/- /*?S - 2^A~
Operator
7-\--'"S
Ambient Temperature C ? p
Barometric Pressure ^?>O
Static Pressure. (Pn) f> S~
Filter Number (s) /tAQ—
Pretest Leak Rate "Q^Oo^ cfm § J2.O'' in. Hg
Pretest Pitot Leak Check
Pretest Orsat Leak Check
Read and Record all Data Every .^e-s- Minutes
Traverse
Point
Number
AM-
/Clock
Sampling / Time
Time , / ( 2 4-hour
(min) / clock)
<£> / /&£<£>&
1^5 fl i %o*r
2*<$ 1(3 /S/ O
/ * — / / 87 sr~
2^> / /fer"2x3
T,y- / / £"L£"'
3c) / /§3ci
^y 1 (&>$'
VO / ( WO
*)-£) / / & $~O
^~S- / fo-S"S~
A o / /yoo
1
1
1
1
f
1
1
1
/
1
Gas Meter
Reading
(vm) ft3
3 5V- S^l
2-S?- ao
^L^/'O*^
,5195,' 3^
3-J^f^/
30p-?-£
3<9/£ ,/Y
^ ^) f-6/6
3/.P-3 v-
~>)( f'Z/
^/9-3"/
^? / ^- C»
^Ji^^M
^--— — "
, ^I/IS
y° /
^ ^^
-^^ ?(M
O,^'^
//criT ^/n -> Pitot Tube I.D. No. //y
^ . Nozzle I.D.
fiXZ^-'-c?" ^^^ f-d/*1^ Assumed Moisture,
<2>;-3Y'~-cac) £^w f^t^if^J Temp. Readout S/N
2>?C~£-'- Oo —3
Hfl /- ?-c> ~Z>
^to^L^-^Oy^i fo-^'^cx-A C Factor
Meter Gamma /, c5 /3>
Heater Box Setting
Reference /\P
Post Test Leak Rate "O^Jicfra 8 2-2 — in. Hg
Schematic of Post Test Pitot Leak Check
Traverse Point Layout Post Test Orsat Leak Check
Velocity
Head ( P8)
in. II20
<^ . o / O
/»
M
(•
"" ^
A
//
cr
'.
//
^;
r^vx-xD
Orifice Pres.
Differential
( H) in. ll?0
Desired
^-9-c)
l'1-d
/'?••=*
A-?C)
f- ~)-&
/
Actual
/,&&
/<-2O
/'/
d? -S7^
<^ •?/
0 - 3~f
0-if~L~
-**
[,(£*
Stack
Temp.
(T8)
°F
/^9~
/v?
/3~d)
/SIC)
/V2£
/ V--?-
/ VC-
/ys—
y v3
/
^ ^z-
^ 5^
99
/oo
/ 0C>
CIL
Outlet
(Tm ) «F
out
6. /
"^/
?-3
T/
toe)
/ 0 /
'/<$!
/O3
9 ^
s/
*«/
Pump
Vacuum
in. Hg
/ 2—
/*/
/S~
/ yZ-
/ ^>
"2--O
2 o
Bo's-i*
-2 t)^z_
2, f
^- /
Z_ C?
Sample
Box Temp.
Filter
Temp . °F
£?y*/
JLj§-
3.
Zz5.->
^Sli~
515-V
Im-
pinge r
Temp.
°F
-^ /
O? ^"~i>
tt? i
-------
SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Plant:
Date:
IV5
Sampling Location: ^/p-o^ \J'~*~G
Sample Type:
Run Number: w C•"- (/' ~ fa- A^S ~ ~L
Sample Box Number:
Clean-up Man: _
Job Number:
Comments:
FRONT HALF
Filter Number:
[ F
Description of Filter:
MOISTURE
Impingers
Final Volume:
Initial Volume:
Net Volume:
Total H2O:
Silica Gel
Final Volume:
Initial Volume
Net Volume
Total Moisture:
->iS
( <5~£>
ml ml
flll ( <3""O TTlT
ml ml
ml
ml
ml
! T-y
$01.$
tV-tJ- Y
g g
g Z-3C4 g
g g 9-ls
^Z '••
dnger Catch:
g
g
1 <*
1 — ^~
9* 1
-------
-------
-------
!&
*-."
-------
HI
.-
• /?
n
(5
-------
.--1
7-
-------
-------
MASTER SAMPLE LOG
Plant
V
Location
Page
of
Project Number
Sample
Number
Run
Code
Date
Sample Type
Container
Type ft/Size
Disposition
-LA
T4 A-A-5
1 L
w/C-7-VC
"2, A r^
u
C(
-------
MASTER SAMPLE LOG
Plant
~-
$r V
Location
Page
of
Proj ect Number
Sample
Number
Run
Code
Date
Sample Type
Container
Type #/Size
Disposition
I
450 JL
?
1 JL
Jl
0
/s
"3i
-7 "3i
-------
APPENDIX C
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
-------
ENGINEERING-SCIENCE
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LABORATORY
600 BANCROFT WAY « BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 04710 • 415/841-7353
J_ ...L
P.O. No.
Job No.
Date Received
Date Reported
c«, fiLtn^ SoUfJ fgS Petitt+j,
Addre» •
LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT
Attention: tK?/4*« lSo/S £**(
Lib No.
Source of Simple
Date Collected:
Time Collected:
1-A
Analyses
T*
Ad-th ufk
(A")
ft } ft
ftu,-** (&,i,i.
COMMENTS:
Units
A/D
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
/vD
tso
v
7(7
A//)
THESE RESULTS WERE OBTAINED BY FOLLOWING ACCEPTED LABORATORY PROCEDURES:
THE LIABILITY OF THE CORPORATION SHALL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT.
. Laboratory Supervisor
~**5S^*^s^
-------
ENGINEERING-SCIENCE
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LABORATORY
$00 BANCROFT WAY • BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA ft4710 • 415/841-7353
LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT
For.
Attention:
Page
1 0
J±= of_^
P.O. No.
Job No.
Date Received
Date Reported
Lib No.
Source of Sample
Did Collected:
Time Collected:
\fi
8
Analyses
£
(i l
COMMENTS:
**<
Units
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
/v
V
A/0
0
A/D
;A^iV •"••'M'-"-"'"•'"• ••' *' ' ;
/VD
THESE NESULT* WE« OBTAINED »v FOLLOWING ACCEPTED LABORATORY IWOCCDUKES: .
THE LlABILIT*' OF THE CORPORATION IHALL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT.
Laboratory Supervisor
TJ^^
-------
ENGINEERING-SCIENCE
flESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LABORATORY
«00 BANCROFT WAY • BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94710 • 415/841-7353
; LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT
P.O. No..
for.
."". 71- - •
; Date Received.
Date Reported.
Attention:
Lib No.
Source of Simple
Date Collected: " '
Time Collected:
-111
-3L.4
Analyses
#g»i^«fcA/t»opA/jio/
At.** f*k
flu,-** (C.A.i)
/I l,
COMMENTS:
Unitt
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
/ooo
A/0
A/fi
A/J)
I /t/D
4/0
$$& •'*'•*•"'*<•••>''••'
••;':;.. ,.''••*-'' ''-'•'. ' -',-•' . • • '•' ----
THESE RESULTS WERE OBTAINED BY FOLLOWING ACCEPTED LABORATORY PROCEDURES:
THE LIABILITY Of THE CORPORATION SHALL MOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT.
- Laboratory Supervisor
WS»S?5r3BT-.S*r-7
-------
ENGINEERING-SCIENCE
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT .LABORATORY
5UU Dftrvi>nwr i TTIM - ccnrxcucT, dALir
UMNIAW471O * 410/O41-/OOJ po Nl,
••••,' '''V-r Job No Vfr ^ 2- /
LABORATORY ANAIYS1S REPORT -n-ta n-r.i-.rt $'S-8S
I fu^^^:/^f^t
Date B«por1«H
f/i>- Atl.nllon- fa A *, Kp A A> -/
AHHrni ..--....:••••• ..
Ub No.
Source ol Stmple .
-Cite Collected: '... .; , . .• ,. :
Time Collected: . " •''• .••.„.' ;. -.;"•-.
?^«^ »r**73L
U+P-1/+ us-r-v-
fi*S- IA S*HS- &.A
.•••''- •••:•' -...--
• _..;. •;'••:-; ••..'-, ; ' '- . - ';
•:-"^.v '-;>'-' • •• .. r " ~ ; . ; .. . .••• . , "- ;
Analyses Units jtM^ ANALYTICAL RESULTS
)^*i/«*rA /tM0A-l>ie/ ^*^ I'BtR) AyD 1713
At-4.lA6llt4h4.lfe.
Ac.**.^^^
A*Mnt,4**.
CtM-rv (*} A*4i**i4itt
It.* i* (i \ flu tn-a *b<*<
%<~-u.Lk\(Iu»+*Uh*»H'**
f/i4.0i-*k'*
l*d*»*(iii>\'t.ff.
frit* * * ffotirt t
ry^'f.h^t.
3.0JK;0•• -
•
v V,
?6/TJO ^00
A/D A>J)
•^o*/^ AOVJO^
1 2-im noo
,. I A/D A^J)
COMMENTS:
:^ ^;v;<^-^^ I, ••-.,-/ -.l.'"1. .-IT,,. .--..\- , -. -...-..
' • • '
THt8E HF8ULTt¥yt«F OBTAINED •YFOLLOWINfl ACCEPTED LA«QB4^p"»*^K*0""^ ,»-^_^__ ''
THE LIABILfTY OF THE CORPORATION SHALL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT.
-Laboratory Supervisor
-------
APPENDIX D
CALCULATIONS
-------
RUN NUMBER " WPV WPV' WPV WPV
1A IB £A £B
METER VOLUME, ACF 59.4(213 60.779 73.376 74.5.12
METER PRESS (DH), IN tf. 60 0.75 1.56 1.70
METER TEMP. , DEB. F 96. 7 95. 9 85. £ 94. 8
BAROM PRESS, IN HB £9.9 £9.9 £9.9 £9.9
BAMMA 1.IZHB7 1.013 1.007 1.013
METER VOL-STD, DSCF 56.996 58.778 7£. 057 7£. 360
CONDENSATE, ML 445.8 470.3 416.4 44-8.7
WATER VAPOR, SCF £0.984 ££.137 19.600 £:L.1£0
MOISTURE CONTENT, % £6.954 £7.4% £1.454 ££. 6%
MOLECULAR WT, DRY £8. 84 £8. 84 £8. 84 £8. 84
MOLECULAR WT, WET £5. 9£ £5.87 £6. 5£ £6.39
A5: ' RUN NUMBER
B5: U --WPV
B6: (T) U "MA
A7: 'METER VOLUME, ACF
B7: (F3) U 59. 403
AS: ---METER PRESS(DH), IN H£0
B8: (F£) U 0. 6
A9: ---METER TEMP., DEB. F
B9: (Fl) U 96.7
A 10: 'BftROM PRESS, IN HB
B10: U £9.9
fill: ' BAMMfi
Bll: (F3) U 1.007
014: 'METER VOL-STD, DSCF
B14: (F3) +B7*B11*(530/ CB9+460) >*< (B10-I- (B8/13. 6) ) /£9. 9£)
fll5: ' CONDENSfiTE, ML
B15: (Fl) U 445. B i
016: 'WftTER VftPOR, SCF
B16: (F3) +B15*0. 04707
A17: 'MOISTURE CONTENT, *
B17: (PI) +B16/ (B16+B14)
ft!9: 'MOLECULAR WT, DRY
B19: £8.84
ft£0: 'MOLECULAR WT, WET
B£0: (F£) U 1 8*B17+ ( ( 1-B17) *B19)
WCV WCV WCV WCV
1A IB £A £B
5£. 666 47.046 36. 8££ 36. 3£6'
1. 0£ 0. 71 l.£7 1. 17
90. 3 78. 0 94. £ 74. 6
£9. 9 £9. 9 £9. 9 £9. 9
1.013 1.007 1.013 i.007
51.477 46.7£1 35.759 36.346
££7.9 198.8 196.1 £13.6
10.7£7 9.358 9. £30 10.054
17. £•/• 16. 7'/. £0. 5'/- £1.754
£8. 84 £6. 84 £8. 84 £8. 84
£6. 97 £7. 03 £6. 6£ £6. 49
r
?
-------
RUN NUMBER
METER VOLUME, LITERS
METER VOLUME, ACF
METER PRESS(DH), IN H£0
METER TEMP., DEG. F
BAROM PRESS, IN HB
GAMMA
WPF-X WPF-X WCF-X WCF-X WCF.-X
1A IB IA £A £B
9.835 7.575 15. £40 10. ££ 8.18
0.348 0. £68 0.539 0.361 0. £89
1. 00 1. 18 1. 00 0. 97 1. £1
86.1 86.1 83.6 81.3 77.9
£9.90 £9.90 £9.90 £9.9 £9.9
0.951 0.955 0.951 0.951 0.955
METER VOL-STD, DSCF
0. £49
0. 500
0. 337
0. £73
A5:
CS:
C6:
A7:
C7:
P)8:
CS:
ft9:
C9:
C10
fill
Cll
'RUN NUMBER
U 'WPF-X
(T) U MA
'METER VOLUME,
U 9. 835
'METER VOLUME,
U 1
: -METER TEMP.,
66. 1
PRESS,
39.9
LITERS
CIS
015
CIS
ACF
IN H£O
(Fl) U
'BAROM
-------
PROCESS CYCLE
WCV-1A
EXHAUST GAS FLOW
RATE, DSCFM
SAMPLE VOLUME
COMPOUND
NAPHTHALENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ACENAPHTHENE
PHENANTHRENE
FLUQRANTHENE
FUJORENE
PYRENE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL.
ANTHRACENE
34£
51.477
ug #/DSCF
MW
1£8.£ £,500,000 1.0 7E-04
15£. £ £, 400 1. 03E-07
154. £ 3,600 1.54E-07
178.-£ 1,400 6. (2Ui'£-08
£0£. 3 (1,000) ^4. £SE-0S
166. £ 4,700 £. 01E-07
£0£. 1 (1,000) -4. 2SE-0S
£66.4 (i,000) -4.£6E-06
178.£ (1,000) -4.£8E-®S
PPMv
3£3. £0 £. £0
0.£6 0.00£11
0. 33 0.00316
0.13 0.001£3
•~0. 06 -0. 0003S
0.47 0.00413
-0.0S -0.00088
-0.06 -0.00068
-0.0S -0.00088
PROCESS CYCLE
EXHAUST GfiS FLOW
ROTE, DSCFM
SAMPLE VOLUME
COMPOUND
NAPHTHALENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ACENAPHTHENE
PHENANTHRENE
FLUORANTHENE
FLUORENE
PYRENE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
WCV-£A
MW
128. £
15S.S
154. £
178. £
£0£. 3
166. £
£0£. 1
£66. 4
319
35.75S
ug #/DSCF
PPMv
#/HR
900, 0130
8, £00
40,000
3, 400
(1,000)
£5,000
(1,000)
(1,000)
5. 55E-05
5.06E-07
£. 47E-06
£. 10E-07-
-6.17E-08
1.54E-06
-6.17E-08
-6.17E-08
167.50 1.06
l.£S 0.00968
6.19 0.047£0
0.46 0.00401
-0.1£ -0.00118
3.59 0.0£950
-0. 1£ -0.00118
-0.09 -0.00116
-------
ANTHRACENE
178. £
(1,000) -S. 17E-08
-0. 13 -0. 00118
PROCESS CYCLE
EXHAUST GAS FLOW
RATE, DSCFM
SAMPLE VOLUME
COMPOUND
NAPHTHALENE
flCENAPHTHYLENE
ACENAPHTHENE
PHENANTHRENE
FLUORANTHENE
FLUORENE
PYRENE
PENTAChLOROPHENOL
ANTHRACENE
WPV-1A
493
56.996
ug #/D3CF
MW
1£S.£ £,000,000 7. 74E-05
15£.S (1,000) -3.S7E-08
154. £ 3121,000 1. 16E--06
178.£ £,100 8.l£E-08
£0£. 3 (1,000) -3. 87E-08
166. £ 8,400 3. £5E-07
£0£. l (1,000) -3. S7E-08
£66.4 (1,000) -3. S7E--08
178. £ < 1,000) -3. 87E-0S
PPMv
#/HR
-0.10 -0.00114
£.9.1 0; 0343£
:0.16 0.0W£40
-0.07 -0.00114
0.76 0.00961
-0. 0'7 -0. 00114
-0.06 -0.00114
-0.08 -0,00114
PROCESS CYCLE
EXHAUST GAS FLOW
RATE, DSCFM
SAMPLE VOLUME
COMPOUND
NAPHTHALENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ACENAPHTHENE
PHENANTHRENE
FLUORANTHENE
FLUORENE
PYRENE
WPV-£A
509
7£. 057
MW
#/D3CF
PPMv
#/HR
1£8.£ 1,000,000 3.06E-05
15£.£ (1,000) -3.06E-08
£5,000 7.65E-07
1,700 5. S0E-0S
-,(1,000) -3. 06E-08
9,800 3.00E-07
(1,000) -3. 06E-08
154. £
178. £
£0£. 3
166. £
£0£. 1
9£. 36 0. 93
•-0. 08 -0. 00093
1.9£ 0. 0£336
0.11 0.00159
-0. 06 -0.00093
0.70 0.00916
-0.06 -0.00093
-------
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
ANTHRACENE
£66.4
178. £
-3.06E-08
-3. 06E-08
-0.04 -0.00033
••-0.07 -0.00093
PROCESS CYCLE
EXHAUST GAS FLOW
RATE, DSCFM
WPF-X-1B
4478. 04310
SAMPLE VOLUME
COMPOUND
NAPHTHALENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ACENAPHTHENE
PHENANTHRENE
FLUORANTHENE
FL.UORENE
PYRENE
PENTACriLORQPHENGL.
ANTHRACENE
MW
1£8.
15£.
154.
178.
£0£.
166.
£0£.
£66.
178.
0. 489
u g #/D3CF -PPMv
£
£
£
c!
wJ
c!
i
4
£
£00
(10)
10
10
(10)
£0
(10;
600
(10)
9.
--^fc
4.
4.
-4.
9.
-4.
£.
-4.
0£E-07
51E-08
51E-0S
5l £-08
51E-03
0££-0B
51E-O6
71E-06
51E-08
£.
-0.
0.
0.
-0.
0.
-a.
il' •
~0.
7£
1 i
11
10
09
Cl J.
0 S
93
10
#/HR
0. £4
-0. 01 £ J. 1
0. 0l£:i .1
0. 0l£,. 1
-0. 0.1 £.1 1
0. iZ>£4£3
-0» 01 £j 1
0. 7ci6V9
-a. 01S11
PROCESS CYCLE
EXHAUST GAS FLOW
RATE, DSCFM
SAMPLE VOLUME
COMPOUND
NAPHTHALENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ACENAPHTHENE
PHENANTHRENE
FLUBRANTHENE
FLUDRENE
WCF-X-EA
3763.36551
0. 337
MW ug #/DSCF PPMv- ti-/HR
1£S. £ 11,070 7. £4E-05 £18.6.1 16.35
1.50 0.13£94
31.19 £.80659
4. £6 0.44315,
0. 50 0.05909
8.83 0.85675
15£.
154.
178.
£0£.
£
c!
£
3
90
1, 900
300
40
5.
1.
1.
c! *
89E-07
£4E-05
96E-06
6££-07
166. £
580 3.79E-06
-------
PYRENE
PENTACHLOROPHEIMOL
ANTHRACEME
£02. 1
£66. 4
178. £
20 1.31E-07
(10) -6.54E-06
100 6.54E-07
0. £5 i23. 02954
-0. 112 -0. 01477
1.42 .0. 14772
PROCESS CYCLE
EXHAUST GAS FLOW
WCF-X-26
RATE, DSCFM
SAMPLE VOLUME
COMPOUND
NAPHTHALENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
fiCENAPHTHENE
PriENANTHRENE
FLUQRAiMTHENE
FLLIQRENiE
PYRENE
PENTACHL.OROPHENOL
ANTHRACENE
MM
128.
152".
154.
178.
202.
166.
202.
266.
178.
3763. 365bl
0. 273
ug tt/DSCF PPmv #/Hrt
c.'
2
2
£
tii
£
1
4
£
1, £00
60
1 , 500
130
(10)
340
(10)
( 1 0 )
£0
9.
4.
1.
1 .
-a.
Cl •
Q
-8.
1.
69E-06
85E-07
£lE~05
05E-06
0SE-03
75E-06
0SE-06
08E--08
62E-07
'"".' '"3 '11' !~" —• T
L 17 •* L. w> L_ . .1.
1 . £3 0. 1094-
30. ^0 2. 7351
9
l
6
2. £8 0. £3705
-0. 15 -0. 0182
^j
6,. 39 0. 61997
-0. 15 -0. 0182
-0. 12 -0. 0132
0. 35 0. 0364
J
^i
7
PROCESS CYCLE
EXHAUST SfiS FLOW
RATE, DSCFM
SAMPLE VOLUME
WCF-X-1AF
4487.08965
0. 3£l
COMPOUND
NAPHTHALENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
fiCENftPHTHENE
PHENANTHRENE
FLUORANTHENE
MW
128.2
152.2
154. 2
178. 2
£02. 3
UQ tt/DSCF PPMv #/HR
3, 000
(10)
2, £00
640
300
£. 06E-C55
-6. 87E-06
1. 51E-05
4. 40E-06
2. 06E-06
62. £0
-0. 17
37. 92
9. 55
•»_> • "3^
\~i m »-J v— .'
-0. 01849
4. 06781
A. 18336
0. 55470
-------
FLUQRENE
PYRENE
PENTftCHLORQPHENDL
RNTHRftCENE
166. £
£02. a
£66. 4
178. £
740 5. 06E-I36. 11.83 1. 36S£6
(10) -6.87E-0S -0.13 -0.01849
(10) -6.87E-0S -0.10 -0.01849
100 6. 87E-07 1.49 0.18490
------- |