EMISSIONS TEST REPORT
AIR TOXICS SAMPLING AT REICHHOLD CHEMICAL
TACOMA, WASHINGTON
Submitted to
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region X
1200 Sixth Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98101
March 1986
46921.00/39-N
Submitted by
Engineering-Science
10521 Rosehaven Street
Fairfax, Virginia 22030
IUU1
D
D
IUU1
[UU1
fUUl
(0
111
-------
EMISSIONS TEST REPORT
AIR TOXICS SAMPLING AT REICHHOLD CHEMICAL
TACOMA, WASHINGTON
Submitted to
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region X
1200 Sixth Avenue
Seattle, Washington 98101
March 1986
46921.00/39-N
Submitted by
Engineering-Science
10521 Rosehaven Street
Fairfax, Virginia 22030
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
CHAPTER 2 PROCESS DESCRIPTION
CHAPTER 3 TEST SCHEDULE AND SAMPLING LOCATIONS
CHAPTER 4 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
CHAPTER 5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
APPENDICES
A PROCESS
B
C
D
1-1
2-1
3-1
4-1
5-1
FIELD DATA
LABORATORY DATA
CALCULATIONS
11
-------
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
From July 22 to August 2, 1985, ES sampled five sources at two plants
in the Seattle, Washington area to collect data on emission of toxic com-
pounds. This report discusses the results of sampling the discharge from
an afterburner on a coating line. Other sources scheduled to be tested
were not sampled as discussed in the next section.
1-1
-------
CHAPTER 2
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
The Reichhold facility is a small chemical plant producing a vari-
ety of resins and some bulk chemicals. Phenol-formaldehyde, urea-form-
aldehyde, and polyester resins are manufactured along with formaldehyde
for captive use and sale. The Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Author-
ity (PSAPCA) identified three sources of particular interest - the form-
aldehyde absorber off-gas, polyester resin reactor, and the coating line
afterburner. A detailed review of the potential emissions sources was
done by PSAPCA and EPA in selecting the sources.
Shortly before the field effort began, Reichhold shut down the
formaldehyde plant for economic reasons. According to plant personnel,
the closure is permanent so no attempt at alternative sampling of this
source was considered. The second source (polyester resin reactor) de-
veloped a leak during the cycle planned for testing and had to be shut
down. The schedule for testing other sources precluded returning to
Reichhold until late the following week, by which time the production
goals had been met and the unit was not operating.
The third source - the coating line afterburner - was sampled as
planned. The operation of the system is described in the following
paragraphs .
Coating line #3 was selected for sampling. Acetone ((CHg^CO) and
MEK (methyl ethyl ketone - CH3COCH2CH3) are used as solvent vehicles for
applying resin to various paper products. The paper coated with resin/
solvent is passed through a series of ovens operating at 200-250°F where
the solvents are evaporated. The evaporated solvents are exhausted in
air to an afterburner for incineration of the volatile organics. The
afterburner is fired with natural gas and exhausts the combustion pro-
ducts ducts through a short stack mounted atop the combustion chamber.
Pollutants of interest are unburned solvent (acetone and MEK) and pro-
ducts of incomplete combustion (PICs) referring to hazardous polynuclear
aromatic compounds (PNAs) listed in Title 40, Part 261, Appendix VIII.
Table 2.1 summarizes the operating data collected during each of
the three sampling runs conducted on coating line #3. The raw data are
located in Appendix A. The operation of the line was generally very
steady, but there were short-term upsets or changes during runs 1 and 3.
During run 1 , the operator changed the viscosity of the applied resin
(increased solvent: resin ratio) for the last hour of the 3-hour test.
During the third run, the solvent pump vapor-locked for a few minutes
2-1
-------
early in the test. Discussions with the operators and review of the
operating data resulted in concluding that neither occurrence should
significantly affect the test validity. However, the average stack
temperature measured during run 1 was significantly lower than during
runs 2 and 3 and the temperature rose and fell when the viscosity ad-
justments were made. The possible effects are discussed in Chapter 5.
2-2
-------
TABLE 2.1
REICHHOLD - COATING LINE #3 OPERATING DATA
ui
Test Paper
Run Speed Oven Temperature
Number ft/min Zone 1
1 52 234
2 52 231
(50-52)
3 51 234
(49-52)
Zone 2
175
(175-178)a
176
(175-180)
176
(175-177)
Zone 3
206
(205-210)
201
(200-205)
199
(195-202)
Resin
Viscosity
(% of
72
(64-78)
68
(67-69)
72
(63-100)
Temperature
Chart)
69
(67-71 )
69
(69-70)
73
(73-74)
Product
Temp.
op
201
(200-204)
197
(195-199)
199
(196-203)
Stack
Temp.
op
623
(495-681 )
828
(824-832)
828
(824-832)
a Numbers in parentheses are the range of observed values.
-------
CHAPTER 3
TEST SCHEDULE AND SAMPLING LOCATIONS
Three test runs were conducted on the discharge of the afterburner
for coating line #3. Each test run consisted of one sample for PIC de-
termination collected with a modified EPA Method 5 train and a set of
samples for volatile organic compound analysis collected with a NIOSH
type charcoal tube sample train. Details of the sampling and analytical
procedures are found in Chapter 4 of this report as well as in the qual-
ity assurance plan for this project. Table 3.1 provides a chronological
summary of the sampling activities. The field data are located in Ap-
pendix B.
Figure 3.1 depicts the sampling location. The relationship of sam-
pling ports to flow disturbances does not meet EPA1s minimum criteria for
determination of flow rate with the accuracy needed for compliance eval-
uation purposes. Further, the physical arrangement did permit a complete
traverse of the stack cross section. These considerations add uncertainty
to the measurement of exhaust gas flow rates. The effect of this addi-
tional uncertainty is discussed in Chapter 5 of this report.
3-1
-------
PERMANENT PLATFORM
33 x 45 in
U)
I
NJ
31 n Sample
PORTS
i75 in
80 in
COMBUSTION
CHAMBER
15 ft
BURNER
REICHHOLD COATING LINE AFTERBURNER
SAMPLING SITE
-------
TABLE 3.1
REICHHOLD SAMPLING CHRONOLOGY
Date
7/23/85
7/23/85
7/23/85
7/23/85
7/23/85
7/24/85
7/24/85
7/24/85
7/24/85
7/24/85
Run Code
PT-1
RC-M5-1
RC-C-1
RC-C-2
RC-C-3
RC-M5-2
RC-C-4
RC-C-5
RC-C-6
RC-M5-3
Sampling Time
1310-1330
1520-1820
1542-1602
1611-1631
1641-1701
0920-1221
0926-0946
0956-1016
1024-1044
1410-1710
Sample Type
Preliminary
Velocity
Traverse
EPA-MM5
NIOSH-Charcoal
NIOSH-Charcoal
NIOSH-Charcoal
EPA-MM5
NIOSH-Charcoal
NIOSH-Charcoal
NIOSH-Charcoal
EPA-MM5
Comments
Cyclonic
Flow Present
3-3
-------
CHAPTER 4
SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
The sampling and analytical procedures for this project are derived
from EPA's "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste" (SW-846, July 1982);
"Sampling and Analysis Methods for Hazardous Waste Combustion (Draft)"
(A.D. Little, Inc., February 1983); "NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods",
U.S. DHEW, NIOSH, Publication #75-121; and Title 40, Part 60, Appendix
A, Code of Federal Regulations. Copies of the analytical results are
contained in Appendix C.
SAMPLING PROCEDURES
Modified Method 5 - General
The MM5 sampling train was used to collect organic compounds with
boiling points between 100°C and 300°C such as products of incomplete
combustion (PICs) and PNAs.
Extracts, rinses, and related materials from the sampling system for
each sampling period were analyzed to quantify the specific compounds of
interest for each test. A total of 3 runs were conducted, and one field
blank sample was generated.
Sampling Train
The gas stream was directed to a modified EPA Method 5 train, de-
picted in Figure 4.1. This system consists of the following components
in series: nozzle, probe, heated particle filter, one sorbent module, a
bank of impingers, and a meter box. A detailed discussion of the physi-
cal construction of the unmodified Method 5 train and its assembly is
given by Martin; maintenance is given by Rom (APTD-0581, APTD-0576).
A glass fiber (particle) filter was enclosed in a glass housing and
supported by a stainless steel mesh. This section of the train was con-
tained in an electrically heated box with manual temperature regulation
to maintain a sample gas temperature of about 120°C.
A typical sorbent module/condenser is also depicted in Figure 4.1.
There are separate sections for cooling the incoming gas stream and for
trapping organic gas constituents. Cooling was accomplished by routing
the gas through a coil of glass tubing surrounded by water circulated
from an ice and water bath. Organic constituents of the gas are removed
4-1
-------
Thermo coupl
f
uple y
Filler Holder
Slack Wall
Probe
•S" Type
Pilot
I
10
Manometer
Thorma-
Coupl*
Cyclone
Healod Zone
a
1
Water Jacketed Condenser
Thermocouple
f Sorbent Trap
Thermometer
Check Valve
Recirculation Pump
Waler
Knockout
Thermometers
Orifice
Impingcr
Pass Valve
Dry Gas Meier Air Tight
Pump
Vacuum Line
Figure 4.1 MMr> Train schematic diagram
-------
by 20/40 mesh XAD-2 resin contained in an all-glass trap. High collec-
tion efficiencies (90-100%) are typical for vapor phase organic species
with boiling points greater than 100°C.
The temperature of the gas at the outlet of the sorbent was measured
and maintained between the limits of 0° and 20°C. Cooling of the gas con-
denses part of the sample gas moisture which may entrain and/or dissolve
certain organic species. To insure that this material is collected, the
sorbent module was positioned vertically such that the condensate perco-
lated through the resin bed and into the bank of impingers.
The impinger bank consisted of four impingers connected in series.
The first impinger was initially empty to collect the condensate from the
preceding sorbent module. The Greenberg-Smith nozzle was replaced by a
very short stem such that the sampled gas does not bubble through the
collected condensate.
The second and third impingers were included to remove acid species
from the gas, and each contained 100 ml chromatographic-grade distilled
water. The fourth impinger was filled with silica gel to absorb moisture
remaining in the gas, thereby assuring accurate gas flow measurements and
preventing damage to the pumping system.
A standard Method 5 meter box containing a variety of gas handling
and metering devices followed the impinger bank.
All components of the sampling train were joined either by stainless
steel Swagelok® fittings or by ground glass ball-and-socket joints cap-
able of leak-free seals under sampling conditions. Stopcock grease was
not used at any point in the system.
All components of the train which contact the sample gas were vigor-
ously cleaned prior to transport to the field. The cleaning consisted of
soaking in chromerge®, rinsing with tap water, distilled water, and chrom-
atographic-grade methanol, successively. All components were sealed with
methylene chloride-rinsed aluminum foil. Preparation of the XAD modules
and resin is discussed in the analytical section.
Prior to each run, the individual components of the sampling train
were assembled, and the probe/sampling train leak-tested. The heating
and cooling systems are started and allowed to reach equilibrium. Then,
the nozzle was plugged and the system evacuated to about 200 mm Hg (15").
If the leakage exceeded the lesser of 4% of the sampling rate or 0.02
cfm, the leak was corrected.
Sampling Procedure
The sampling plan called for single-point constant rate sampling
for 3-4 hours and the samples were collected in this manner. A velocity
traverse was conducted and a point of average velocity determined. The
samples were extracted from this point at a rate proportional to the
measured stack gas velocity.
4-3
-------
Post-Test Operations
At the conclusion of the test, the train was leak checked and al-
lowed to cool. The probe/nozzle unit was removed and capped, and the
filter holder inlet capped, and all components taken to the cleanup area
for sample recovery. The basic procedures of EPA Method 5 were followed,
modified as necessary for recovery of samples for organic analysis. The
probe, nozzle and filter holder were each rinsed three times with ace-
tone and then three times with methylene chloride. All liquid samples
were transferred to glass bottles with Teflon®-lined caps which had been
cleaned as previously described for the glassware. The XAD module was
removed from the train and sealed with grease-free glass balls and sock-
ets. The impingers were removed and the volume of condensed water col-
lected measured. The percolated condensate from the first impinger was
transferred to a sample bottle along with rinses from the condenser, the
contents of the second and third impingers and acetone and methylene
chloride rinses of all three impingers and connecting glassware. All
bottles were tightly capped, sealed with Teflon®-lined caps and Teflon®
tape, and the liquid level marked on the bottles.
For these tests, one XAD module was exposed as a field blank to the
lab. There was one trip blank included in the shipment. The field blank
was installed into a sample train, leak checked, heated to 120°C for 2
hours, and then recovered along with the other sample train fractions.
NIOSH Sorbent Tube Sampling
Afterburner emissions were also sampled with a NIOSH-type sampling
train using activated charcoal as the sorbent medium. The sampling rate
was 0.25 liters/minute for 20 minutes to collect a 5 liter gas sample.
Sampling Train
Figure 4.2 displays a typical NIOSH design sorbent tube and the
sampling train used to extract the sample gas from the stack. An EPA
Method 6 type metering/flow control system was used to pull the sample
gas and measure the sampled gas volume. The sample train consisted of
one NIOSH-design tube containing 600 mg of activated charcoal, a moisture
removal trap, sample line, and control console containing pump, rotameter
and dry gas meter. Flow rate (0.25 1/min) and total gas volume (51) were
chosen to match the capacity of the sorbent and the analytical sensiti-
vity necessary.
Sampling Procedure
Samples were collected by breaking off the ends of the flame sealed
sorbent tubes and pulling sample gas through the tube at 0.25 liter/minute
for 20 minutes. At the conclusion of sampling, the tubes were removed
from the trains and capped with caps supplied by the manufacturer, and
then placed in an envelope, pre-labeled with the date, run number, and
sample ID number.
4-4
-------
STAINLESS STEEL
PROBE
COARSE VALVE
THERMOCOUPLES
V
DRY GAS
METER
\
NIOSH DESIGN
CHARCOAL TUBE
GLASS/TUBING
FITTINGS
PRECISON
ROTAMETER
SILICA GEL
DRYING TUBE
KXXXXXXX
SURGE
TANK
DIAPHRAGM
PUMP
NEEDLE VALVE
Ffflff 4.2
IE SAMPLING UN
-------
Post-Test Operations
Field blanks were taken by breaking the ends of a tube and exposing
to ambient air for a time period equal to sample collection time. A trip
blank (a tube taken to the field but not opened) was stored and shipped
with the sample tubes.
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
Modified Method 5 Analyses
Preparation and analysis of the MM5 samples is described below.
1. Container No. 1 (contents of the first, second, and third im-
pingers from the MM5 sample train) - Noted the physical properties of
the sample as to color, consistency, presence of solids, and measured
the volume. Spiked the sample as necessary with the required surrogate
compounds for QC purposes. Without adjusting the sample pH, transferred
the impinger solution to a 1000-ml separatory funnel. Rinsed the sample
container with 20 ml of acetone, followed by two 20 ml portions of methy-
lene chloride, adding the rinses to the separatory funnel. Extracted the
sample with three separate aliquots of methylene chloride, transferring
to a K-D evaporator, after filtering through pre-extracted, dried Na2SO4.
2. Container No. 2 (methylene chloride, acetone rinse of probe,
filter housing, and any miscellaneous glassware) - Noted the physical
properties of the sample as to color, consistency, presence of solids,
and measure the volume. Spiked the original solvent sample as necessary
for QC purposes. Added to the K-D evaporator as in Step A.
3. Container No. 3 (filter) - Noted the physical properties of the
filter as to color, consistency, and presence of particles. Placed the
filter into the thimble containing the XAD-2® resin and proceed as des-
cribed in 4 below.
4. XAD-2® Adsorbent - Observed and noted the physical properties of
the sample. Spiked the sample as necessary with compounds directly into
the adsorbents before their removal from the glass sorbent trap. Expel
the entire contents of the sorbent trap into a glass extraction thimble
with a coarse-fritted bottom.
The resin in the thimble was covered with glass wool to prevent the
resin from floating out into the Soxhlet extractor. The sorbent trap was
rinsed with 10 ml acetone and then three 1 0 ml portions of methylene chlo-
ride, and these rinses added to the receiver. The Soxhlet extractor was
charged with 250 ml methylene chloride, and this resin extracted for 24
hours with a cycle time of 10 to 14 times per hour. The extractate was
then added to the K-D evaporator as described above for Container No. 1.
6. After all components of the sample were combined in the K-D eva-
porator, the volume was reduced to a known, small volume (5 ml). This
sample was further evaporated or rediluted as required to obtain analyti-
cal responses within the ranges of the calibration curves for the various
analytes.
4-6
-------
The samples were injected into a temperature-programmed capillary
column gas chromatograph with mass spectrometer (GC/MS) for identification
and quantification of analytes. The samples were first analyzed on GC/FID
to obtain approximate analyte concentrations to establish appropriate di-
lutions, if any, for mass spec analysis. The general procedure described
in EPA publication SW 846 was used for set up and calibration of the GC/MS
and compound identification performed by the data system with verification
by the analyst. Quantification of analytes was made by response factor
calculation relative to phenanthrene.
Charcoal Tube Samples
Following standard NIOSH analytical procedures, the charcoal tubes
were analyzed for DMK and MEK with a gas chromatograph/flame ionization
detector (GC/FID). Calibration standards for acetone and methyl ethyl
ketone were used and other solvent peaks (methanol), if any, quantified
against the DMK standard.
The analysis was performed as follows: the caps were removed from
the tubes .and the end of the tube broken off so the contents could be
removed. The charcoal was emptied into a 5 ml glass vial and 1 ml of
carbon disulfide (CS2) added. The vial was sealed with a septum cap and
mechanically agitated for 45 minutes.
An aliquot was removed through the septum with a precision microliter
syringe and injected into the GC. The GC was equipped with a column and
operated isothermally at 60°C. A series of calibration standards were
prepared to achieve the required detection limit, instrument linearity
verified, and response factors calculated. Quantitation of analyte mass
was performed with an electronic integrator. Results were calculated
from total mass per injection volume times total desorbent volume. No
dilutions were necessary.
4-7
-------
CHAPTER 5
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Tables 5.1 a and 5.1b summarize the MM5 and the charcoal tube sam-
pling data and Table 5.2a presents emission rates based on detected
values or detection limit of the analytical procedure as applicable. In
most cases, none of the target compounds were detected in the samples and
the data reported in the table represent calculations using the minimum
detectable amount, as the compound could have been present up to that
amount and gone undetected.
The only PNA found in all three MM5 samples was naphthalene. Run 3
showed a substantial (5000 ug) amount of pentachlorophenol, and this value
is reported in the table although there is no reason to believe that
pentachlorophenol was present in the stack gas. The sample blanks for both
charcoal tube and MM5 samples showed no detectable contamination except
naphthalene in the MM5 samples. It is possible that the pentachlorophenol
value resulted from contamination of a single sample.
The charcoal tube samples were analyzed for both two solvents used
in the process and any other peaks. One of the 6 samples contained a
detectable amount of a compound identified as methanol and no other vo-
latile organic compounds were observed in the chromatogram. The methanol
measured during run RC-C-1 and the higher value for naphthalene measured
for RC-M5-1 may be a result of afterburner operations as the stack tem-
perature was lower during this time period than during the other sampling.
However, the emission rate calculated from the amount of methanol found
in tube #1 is greater than the total amount of solvent used in the process.
Even if all the solvent was somehow converted to methanol in the afterburner
and none of it burned, the emission rate would not be as high as calculated.
Furthermore, no other tube contained any detectable methanol. It is likely
that the sample was contaminated - probaly from inadequate purging of the
sample probe. If the single anomalous methanol value is ignored, the emis-
sion of acetone and methyl/ethyl ketone were less than 0.65 Ib/hr and 0.26
Ib/hr respectively (<4.2 ppm and <1.4 ppm).
Gas flow rates have been calculated from the limited data available.
Because of the physical arrangement, a complete stack velocity profile
could not be measured. The flow was cyclonic and the lack of data pre-
vents a thorough evaluation of the flow rate. The flow rates used in
the calculations are higher than the true values because no correction
for the cyclonic flow was attempted. (The velocity measurements were
made with the pitot tube faces aligned normal to direction of gas flow.)
5-1
-------
TABLE 5.1 a
SAMPLING DATA
MODIFIED METHOD 5
Parameter
Date
Sampling Period
Sampling Time (min)
Sample Volume (dscf)
Stack Gas Data:
Moisture (%)
C02 (%)
02 (%)
Temperature (°F)
Velocity (ft/sec)
Flow Rate (acfm)
Flow Rate (dscfm)
RC-M5-1
7/23/85
1520-1820
180
142.605
4.6
2.2
17.8
623
21 .6
36,700
17,300
RC-M5-2
7/24/85
0920-1221
180
153.271
4.7
2.2
17.8
828
25.4
43,100
17,100
RC-M5-3
7/24/85
1410-1710
180
84.445
4.6
2.2
17.8
828
21 .1
35,800
14,200
5-2
-------
TABLE 5.1b
SAMPLING DATA
CHARCOAL TUBE
Run Code
Date
Sampling
Period
Sampling Time
(min)
Volume Sample
(dscf)
RC-C-1
RC-C-2
RC-C-3
RC-C-4
RC-C-5
RC-C-6
7/23/85
7/23/85
7/23/85
7/24/85
7/24/85
7/24/85
1542-1602
1611-1631
1641-1701
0926-0946
0956-1016
1024-1044
20
20
20
20
20
20
0.173
0.178
0.177
0.182
0.182
0.182
5-3
-------
TABLE 5.2a
PNA EMISSIONS
MODIFIED METHOD 5
Naphthalene Pentachlorophenol
Run Code
RC-M5-1
RC-M5-2
RC-M5-3
Field
Blank
Gas Flow
Rate
17,300
17,100
14,200
Total
Mass
(ug)
350
130
64
74
Total
Mass
ppbv Ib/hr (ug) ppbv Ib/hr
16.3 0.0056 <20 ND
5.6 0.0019 <20 ND
5.0 0.0014 5,000 190 0.11
<20
Total
Mass
(ug)
<20
<20
<20
<20
PNA Detection
Limits
ppbv Ib/hr
a <0.003
a <0.003
a <0.004
a Detectable concentration ranged between 0.5 and 1.1 ppb based on 20 ug detection limit in total
sample.
-------
TABLE 5.2b
SOLVENT EMISSION
CHARCOAL TUBE SAMPLING
Ul
1
01
Run Code
RC-C-1
RC-C-2
RC-C-3
RC-C-4
RC-C-5
RC-C-6
Gas Flow Rate
17,300
17,300
17,300
17,100
17,100
17,100
Methanol
ppmv Ib/hr
215 18.5
<15 <1 .3
<15 <1 .3
<15 <1.2
<15 <1 .2
<15 <1 .2
Emissions
Acetone
ppmv Ib/hr
<4.2 <0.66
<4.1 <0.64
<4.1 <0.65
<4.0 <0.63
<4.0 <0.63
<4.0 <0.63
Methyl Ethyl
Ketone
ppmv
<1 .4
<1 .3
<1 .3
<1 .3
<1 .3
<1 .3
Ib/hr
<0.26
<0.26
<0.26
<0.25
<0.25
<0.25
-------
APPENDIX A
PROCESS DATA RECORDS
-------
735"
rr
K
•'71-.
/<
n
7
IV
i/
U
/l
'<
/r
u
'j
IV
' v i
ff ' -
'l lr
«v
•I
»(
*«
«
MO
$ l (
'< '(
9L03
m
ro
S"/
39-
3*
6,7-
63
93
61
-------
-------
APPENDIX B
FIELD DATA
-------
•• o
TRAVERSE VtlNT LOCATION FOR CIRCULAR UOCTS
PLANT.
DATE.
SAMPLING LOCATION
INSIDE OF FAR WALL TO
OUTSIDE OF NIPPLE, (DISTANCE A) _
INSIDE OF NEAR WALL TO
OUTSIDE OF NIPPLE, (DISTANCE B) _
STACK IJJ., (DISTANCE A - DISTANCE B).
NEAREST UPSTREAM DISTURBANCE
NEAREST DOWNSTREAM DISTURBANCE.
CALCULATOR
(I
SCHEMATIC OF SAMPLING LOCATION
TRAVERSE
POINT
NUMBER
I
I
FRACTION
OF STACK 1.0.
STACK I.D.
PRODUCT OF
COLUMNS 2 AND 3
(TO NEAREST 1/3 INCH)
DISTANCE B
TRAVERSE POINT LOW
FROM OUTSIDE OF NIP!
(SUM OF COLUMNS^ I
-*&
"
•— 7
-7
i
-1
3
0
If
4/77
-------
PRELIMINARY. VELOCITY TRAVERSE
Plant:
Date:
Location:
Stack I.D.:
Barometric Pressure, in. Hg:
Stack Gauge Pressure, in. H2
Operators: ^T^> /
Pitot Tube I.D. Number: _
Temps ra tur e Re ad out I.D.:
Pitot Tube Leak Check:
Location
1
-r-
T
t
Schematic of Traverse Point Layout
Traverse
Point
Number
1
3-
^
#
^
i /
it
Jr—
%
$
£r\/f>
Average
Velocity
Head (Aps )
in. HsO
0,0^
O oT—&
o.o^r
0-0^0
O,0 T2-^
o.0y*
^.e?9o
0 -tf3-5"
0^030
r><& ^H
Stack
Temp.
DDI
%c)
OV'J*
SG3
55^5-
^35"
^c)
fe^T—
t*n
—
Cyclonic
Flow Check
0 from Null
tM*
(0
Traverse
Point
Number
Average
Velocity
Head (Aps)
in. HgO
Stack
Temp.
Cyclonic
Flow Check
0 from Null
-------
Plant
Date
FIELD DATA
cfm 6 /*7 in. Hg
Post Test Pitot Leak Check
Post Test Orsat Leak Check
Traverse
Point
Number
/Clock
Sampling / Time
Time, /(24-hour
(min) / clock)
Gas Meter
Reading
0
93
*
//o
o.o J-S
^4-
£0 /
, o
6%
jL-£
2
3-
2s-1
-------
SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Plant:
Date:
Sampling Location:
Sample Type: AV
Run Number: "R.- /W AV
Sample Box Number: "'
Clean-up Man:
Job Number:
Comments:
FRONT HALF
Filter Number:
Description of Filter:
MOISTURE
Impingers
Final Volume:
Initial Volume:
Net Volume:
Total H20:
Silica Gel
Final Volume:
Initial Volume
Net Volume
Total Moisture:
£-~\ i- mi
| ~°^ ml I 2Ri
ml
ml
ml
ml
ml
ml
ml
^
:? s 1- x g
"2,^34-^ g 1
g
g g
^ T S , D g g
g g
.:>?. ^
/iff/ £1
Description of Impinger Catch: /'I, /
-------
Plant
Date
FIELD DATA
Sampling Location
Sample Type
Run Number
Operator
S~- "
Ambient Temperature
Barometric Pressure
Static Pressure (Pfl)
Filter Number(s)
Pretest Leak Rate • 6.o/^ cf m 8 /C in. llg
Pretest Pi tot Leak Check Q)C _
Pretest Orsat Leak Check —
Probe Length and Type
Pi tot Tube I.D. No.
Nozzle I.D.
Assumed Moisture, %
Temp. Readout S/N
Meter Box Number
Meter llg
C Factor _^
Meter Gamma
Heater Box Setting
Reference^p
Read and Record all Data Every
Minutes
Schematic of
Traverse Point Layout
Post Test Leak Rate
Post Test Pi tot Leak Check
Post Test Orsat Leak Check
in. llg
Traverse
Point
Number
/Clock
Sampling / Time
Time, /(24-hour
(min) / clock)
Gas Meter
Reading
(v) ft3
Velocity
Head ( Pa)
in. II20
Orifice Pres.
Differential
( H) in. II20
Desired Actual
Stack
Temp.
(T8)
°F
Dry Gas Meter Temp.
Inlet
F
Pump
Vacuum
in. llg
Sample
Box Temp.
Filter
Temp. °F
Im-
pinger
Temp.
op
/ 092,0
£>
l/o/O
LO 1
,00
65-
150
o-o -5s
I/O I f/if
ts
/ L& 1
o o
-r
2X2
/QO
o
^L
.s-0
JLL
-------
Plant:
Date:
SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
^cLUli
Sampling Location:
Sample Type:
Run Number: vV A^-A^S '
Sample Box Number:
Clean-up Man:
Job Number:
Comments:
FRONT HALF
Filter Number:
I*
Description of Filter:
MOISTURE
Impingers
Final Volume:
Initial Volume:
Net Volume:
Total H2O:
Silica Gel
Final Volume:
Initial Volume
Net Volume
Total Moisture:
3 l U
i^rQ
ml
ml
ml
ml ml
| ^ ml ml
ml ml
/ ' a
530-0
7/3 •f.6)
g
g
g
g ^ i.'O, O q
^Z-9 g --^ ^ g
g S~^ ~ " , g
linger Catch :
-------
FIELD DATA
Sampling Location
Sample Type
Run Number
Operator
Ambient Temperature
Bar ome trio Pressure
Static Pressure (Pfl)
Filter Number (a)
Pretest Leak Rate - 0.<3/t|cfa 8
Pretest Pi tot Leak Check
Pretest Orsat Leak Check
in. Hg
Probe Length and Type
Pltot Tube I.D. No. _
Nozzle I.D.
Assumed Moisture, %
Temp. Readout S/N
Meter Box Number
Meter Hfl
C Factor __
Meter Gamma
Heater Box Setting
Reference.
Read and Record all Data Every /c? Minutes
Schematic of
Traverse Point Layout
Post Test Leak Rate "Q-.o/ccfra i 0 1 /57O
6, 0 5\Sr
o
O,
/o
0
O
O / <
(b
/oo
/ T
.s 3
/ ($00
/ O 0
f
0.
Ht°
&$-
S3L.
23L
2SL
Z_
/.
-------
SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA
Plant:
Date:
Sampling Location:
Sample Type:
Run Number: p. *- >^vK £ - 3
Sample Box Number:
Clean-up Man:
Job Number:
Comments:
FRONT HALF
Filter Number:
Description of Filter
MOISTURE
Impingers
Final Volume:
Initial Volume:
Net Volume:
Total H2O:
Silica Gel
Final Volume: "t~) '-> g
Initial Volume "Z^'R -^ g
Net Volume g
Total Moisture:
Description of Impinger Catch:
t GO ml
1/Dcs ml I
ml
ml
^ ml
ml
ml
ml
ml
-------
Plant
Date
FIELD DATA
Sampling Location
Sample Type
Run Number
Operator
Ambient Temperature
Barometric Pressure
Static Pressure (P8)
Filter Number(s)
"ffp
Pretest Leak Rate ™mVO cfm 8
Pretest Pi tot Leak CnScK —-
Pretest Orsat Leak Check -
Read and Record all Data Every
In. llg
J
C -
Probe Length and Type
PI tot Tube I.D. No.
Nozzle I.D.
Assumed Moisture, % . -—
Temp. Readout S/N _W_Scr
Meter Box Number __
Meter llg —
C Factor •
Meter Gamma p.^
Heater Box Setting
Reference
Minutes
Schematic of
Traverse Point Layout
Post Test Leak Rate « cfra 0
Post Test Pltot Leak Check —
Post Test Orsat Leak Check """"
in. llg
Traverse
Point
Number
S u T-
6 £^
I*
it
\ •
1 '
1*
F^klr^
1 1
6"Tt-
/Clock
Sampling / Time
Time, /(24-hour
(min) / clock)
R^ - c-/ \ ~
-& Q /( 5^ 2.
s i \ $ ^n
\O / !ik
\0 / U"2-l
i5 / 16-z-k
-L o / I C 3 1
/
«™ SSSSSSSSl1"1' """ y
o / i&M-t
^ / it*t
(0 / I6
5.T-02- x.
M-$.o^"2<
M4.q^
q-i.n s1
H^.05
5"o M'*7 &
5,-^x
So.qi4
.SU ^3
5O^K^
S,SS"3^
SvWv^
lib T • _f liiii
•KSSS~\ — Pg^)
-tWT-tt^O
0-?
H--3
^^
4-8
S-Tt^
V ' ^^1
V^
M- 9
^^
q ?
ST*? ^
Y-t- S.i"30
S-?
4^
4S
^^
ST^^?
y-- s.m
Orifice Pres.
Differential
( H) in. II 2O
Desired
—
—
—
—
—
-TI>^,
—
—
- —
—
t iO~i>
—
—
• —
- Ev/b
Actual
—
\.o
\. V
l.O
«. 1
T0£-
»-o 5
i.o
1 )
(. 1
1-0
res^c
i. o$
o.^
I i
i- v
|. 0
TCS^S:
t" . 03
Stack
Temp.
? ^
SH^°R
f-n
7n
^7
7 r
SHI-S1-
'^^
^^
^o
cjo
^^.s1-
Outlet
(Tm ) °F
mout'
—
^0
^3
•f^-
^^
TI
7T
^^
?y
^
^0
-
-------
Plant
Date
FIELD DATA
Sampling Location
Sample Type
Run Number
Operator
A
•RC-C-
Ambient Temperature
Barometric Pressure
Static Pressure (P8)
Filter Number(s)
Pretest Leak Rate - (?VC cfm 8
Pretest Pitot Leak Check —-
Pretest Orsat Leak Check —"
in. llg
Probe Length and Type
Pi tot Tube I.D. Mo. _
Nozzle I.D. "—
Assumed Moisture, %
Temp. Readout S/N V/QST °f
Meter Box Number l/OST • jr
Meter II0
C Factor —
Meter Gamma O. °( 5 <
Heater Box Setting "~
Reference
Read and Record all Data Every ^ Minutes
Schematia of
Traverse Point Layout
Post Test Leak Rate « — cfra
Post Test Pitot Leak Check
Post Test Orsat Leak Check
in. Hg
Traverse
Point
Number
If •« T-
ts Xw.
VI
II
U
i i
T^C
16, "Xw
• '
vl
1 •
If
^c
d"X^
u
l«
n
/Clock
Sampling / Time
Time, /(24-hour
(mln) / clock)
O / o^x4
c, / o^H
\o / o°i3&
v^ / <^^\^v
^9 / 0<^U
/
-<--S /
o / o^sk
S Aoot
to / \ot>6>
( 5 /ion
7^) / lOlt,
/
/
-c-4 /
o / 10-z,^
«; / 10 -z^
ID / (DOS'
15 / i03°l
Zo / \OW
/
1
1
Gas Meter
Reading
(vm) ft3
56.010
^T«k>
^^.^0
60. CO
6\-^SS
STi^Sy
6«.15S
6-Z.^S
6
<4?
M-1?
^^
4-8
ST^V-
V* 5,o^3
H5?
q-^
*f^
4€
V>-
•AY-- SAT?
^^
^•7
ctl?
H^
S-ov>-
V- S.i^-Z.
Orifice Pres.
Differential
( H) in. II2O
Desired
—
- —
—
—
€v\>
^ —
—
—
—
EK^
—
—
—
. —
"tvT>
Actual
o.<\
i.o
LO
t . o
r-tr^
o.^^
0.^
i-O
(.0
1- °
res^r
«?.«»?
o.
-------
MASTER SAMPLE LOG
Plant
Location
Page
of
Project Number
Sample
Number
Run
Code
Date
Sample Type
Container
Type ft/Size
Disposition
Rc-C-
-I
-3
-5
-C
I L
J JL
V
J>"
-------
APPENDIX C
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
-------
ENGINEERING-SCIENCE
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LABORATORY
600 BANCROFT WAY • BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94710 • 415/841-7353
Page _1 of 2_
LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT
P. O. No.
job NO. 8037.28
Date Received 8/5/85
Date Reported 9/26/85
For Engineering-Science. Inc.
.Attention: John Bolstad
Address Two Flint Hill
10521 Rosehaven Street
Fairfax. Virginia 22030
Lab No.:
Source of Sample:
852054
852055
852Q56
852057
RC-C-1
RC-C-2
RC-C-3
RC-C-4
Charcoal tube Charcoal tube Charcoal tube Charcoal tube
Date Collected:
Time Collected:
Analyses
Methanol
Acetone
Units ANALYTICAL RESULTS
mq/sample 1.4 <0.1 <0.1
mq/sample <0.05 <0.05 <0.05
<0.05
Methyl ethyl ketone mq/sample
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
COMMENTS:
THESE RESULTS WERE OBTAINED BY FOLLOWING ACCEPTED LABORATORY PROCEDURES,
THE LIABILITY OF THE CORPORATION SHALL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT.
Laboratory Supervisor
-------
ENGINEERING-SCIENCE
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LABORATORY
600 BANCROFT WAY • BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94710 • 415/841-7353
Page
.of.
LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT
P. O. No.
.,nhNn. 8037.28
Date Received 8/5/85
Date Reported 9/26/85
For Engineering-Science, Inc.
Address Two Flint Hill. 10521 Rosehaven Street
.Attention: John Bolstad
Fairfax, Virginia 22030
Lab No.:
Source of Sample:
852058
852059
852060
RC-C-5
RC-C-6
RC-C-7
Charcoal tube Charcoal tube Charcoal tube
Date Collected:
Time Collected:
Analyses
Methanol
Acetone
Units
mq/sample <0.1
mq/sample <0.05
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
<0.1 <0.1
<0.05 <0.05
Methyl ethyl ketone mq/sample <0.02
<0.02
<0.02
COMMENTS:
RECEIVED
noT n Wft^
Oo I 6 l303
ENGINEERING SCIENCE
THpii 08TAINED BY FOLLOWING ACCEPTED LABORATORY PROCEDURES,
i«t LIABILITY OF THE CORPORATION SHALL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT.
Laboratory Supervisor
-------
E
3^»j
IING-SCIENCE
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LABORATORY
100 BANCROFT WAY « BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94710 • 415/841-7353
JL
- '• '•••'"• "' :,-" .'.'•''' '.•'"'•':•••.-•••' '' • . ' ''-';'. - J<
LABORATORY ANALYSIS REPORT bateRw
,_/^^w /r<^
A^,..t •'• ' •"
LibNo. •'•'-..
Source of Simple
t)*te Collected: '/ V
Time Collected: ; . • .: V
Analyses Units {
i • -L
fftn+*e,li htveli-fhoi . JLA^f^^ €
Ac-tK ttk tkvltx*
A*Un***<
V(.Mt* (*] &*4*t-lit4kt
timi* (i \ flu »r* * /*«*'
D6H-L* ^4ri f/Ufl-** I i *fc«
f<.H1* (*) f V*+ *•<
\)t+*+ (CL.1,1) f*+ytif<
*'tth~i,.rtU*kk*
tltMlK
'Dibto^UitiAnHHttM
rlupt-* » t"k* *> **•
fl<*t>Kk«
f **(**• (t.M-LJ) yK.<
AjApk+ktU*,*.
f !***•»&***
;
'
fy***. " 1
COMMENTS:
Date Ret
f*Jf' Attention: 30A* Bo/S^A^
,KW« V^^3-/
~>iu»H ? •* 5 "IT b
•vnrt^H
:'•••-.. ••• •'- . ' „ ,/•'•..•.••...
o>5"5-0^/ $S a.o^?L ?S"5.o^3 5"S'5-06^
•/?t-'/M?- / /?d-/*'^'9L >?^,-/vtg-3 /Zc-frS-*-/
'''•.•> •' •'" '.-''• " •
-•- :.:-:-:^.:> x/ .•'• '_ -k -y: ;••-• -. .-• . "• -
^tt*.^ ANALYTICAL RESULTS
\
3LO
%
.. -
-• ^
\
-: •— . -» :
y
A/D t
•-
' \
•
/ V
\
;
/
" 3Sb :' /3» ^V .7^
A/£> A/P A//) A/Pi
/U) M> AcO A/D
**
'''.*/^^:-''i&$-&&.*K -.v-v.^-V &:-• '• ., • -.-:• ••.--
• '•. ./•-" • >' ." • -'".•' ' •' ' •'•" ' "'• •'•-• • ' "' '" , ' ' •' •'•' '.''.'• / '
JHIII MEBULTt WERE OBTAINED BY fOUpwmft ACCf mO LABORATORY ««X*DURE8: '— . n
IE LIABILITY OF c " —- "WSfiifflitw fjt MI r*av SBSBSIB »«*e AMOUNT ^AID FOR THIS REPORT.
Laboratory Supervisor
-------
APPENDIX D
CALCULATIONS
-------
b.NG 1 NEERING-SCIENCE
FAIRFAX,VIRGINIA
.FILE NAME RC-M5-1
PLANT ID REICHHOLD CHEM
STOCK ID CL-3
DOTE 7/23/85
RUNS 1
START TIME
FINISH TIME
13
0
. SAMPLING TIME = 180 MIN3
STOCK SIZE ; 7£ IN
HREO OF STACK = £3.£7 i
MILLIL.ITERS COLLECTED: 144.9
wlIBHT COLLECTED = 100 MB
CORBON DIOXIDE C0£ =
OXYGEN 0£ =
CfiRBON MONOXIDE CO
NITROGEN N£
NOZZLE AREA NA
HV8. SQUARE ROOT DELTA P DP =
flVG. DELTA H DH
fiVG. METER TEMPERATURE TM =
fiVB. STACK TEMPERATURE TS
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE PB =
STOCK PRESSURE PS
VOLUME OF METER ACTUAL VM =
METER COEFFICIENT MC =
VOLUME OF WATER VAPOR VW =
VOLUME OF METER STD. VO =
FRACTION MOISTURE CONTENT BW =
FROCTION DRY AIR FDA =
MOLECULAR WEIGHT DRY MD =
MOLECULAR WEIGHT WET MS =
EXCESS AIR EA =
VELOCITY IN STACK VS =
STOCK FLOW ACTUAL QA =
STOCK FLOW STD .QS =
I SDKIMETICS ISO =
£. £ %
17.8 •/.
0 %
30 •/-
1. 36353b£-0>:
IN. WATER
94 F
6£3 F
30. 3 IN. HG«
30. 31 IN. HG.
145.£01 ACF
1.013
5. 3£:2 SCF
14£.60S DSCF
13. 0456
"2i. 9544
£9. 06
£3. 56
536. 14 •/.
£l.608 FPS
366
ACFM
17£74 SCFM
95. :i.£ %
N LOADING STD CS
BRAIN LOADING ACTUAL CA
CONCENTRATION C
EMISSION RATE ER
EMISSION PER MILL.. BTU E
BRAINS/DSCF & 50% £A C50
0.0108 BR/DSCF
0.0051 GR/ACF
0.0000 LB/DSCF
1.S0£ LB/HR
0.0000 LB/MM BTU
0. 0460 6R/DSCF &
-------
ENia i NEE:L-R i NG-SC i EMC
FAIRFAX,VIRGINIA
FILE NAME RC-M5-E
PLPlNT ID REICHHOLD CHEM
DATE 7/E4/S5
RUN* £
START TIME 09£0
FINISH TIME l££l
SAMPLING TIME = 180 Ml MS
b'TPiCK SIZE :
AREA OF STACK =
lLlTERS COLLECTED
WEIGHT COi_LECTED =
J£ IN
£6. S.7
16£, £ i
103 MG
fiVG.
fiVG,
CARBON DIOXIDE CDS =
QXYGEN! 0£ =
ChRBON MONOXIDE CO
NITROGEN N£
NOZZLE AREA NA
SVG. SQUARE ROOT DELTA P DP =
DEuTA H DH
METER TEMPERATURE TM
fiV3. STACK TEMPERATURE TS —
ciHixOMETR IC PRESSURE i-'fa' —'
STACK PRESSURE PS =
VGL_UME OF METER ACTUAL Vfi =
METER COEFFICIENT NC =
VOLUME OF WATER VAPOR VW =
VOLUME OF flETER STD. VO =
FRACTION MOISTURE CONTENT BW =
FRftCTION DRY AIR FDA =
^iULECULAR WEIGHT DRY MB =
r'iGLECULAR WEIGHT vjET MS —
EXCESS AIR £A =
VELOCITY IN STACK VS =
STACK FLOW ACTUAL QA =
£". -,-• T; f~; CJ; —
O i LJ UiO —
ISO =
S
c: „ ui i i i''
36. £9939
to A i LI R
30. 3 IN. hG.
30. 31 IN. HG.
15S.£0iZi ACF
1.313
7, 635 SCF
1 CO. c! / 1
0. ®474
£9. 0S
£3. 54
536. 14 7«
£5. 4i 3 F PS
43106 flCFM
17050 SCFM
103. 5S '/.
GRAIN L.OADING' ttTD
3RAIIM LOADING fiCTUf
'- v U i V; C £ N T R A T10 i\
c.,v! ISE31 CM R A i •-•
EMISSION PER i^ili-u.
S'VU
6SAINS/DSCF & 53% £A
C3
CA
C
ER
C50
0.0101 GR/DSUF
0. 0040 6R/ACF
0. 0000 u-3/BSiJF
1.471 L3/i-iR
0. 0000 LB/. •••; i^i BTU
0. 04ES 6R/D3CF 550
EA.
-------
i=.NG IMEE RING--SCI EMC
FfllRFftX,VIRGINIA
FILE NftWE RC-M5-3
PLfiNT ID REIChHOLD CHE?1
STHCK ID CL3
DftTE 7/24/65
ft UN IT 3
STfiRT TIME 1410
F 2 M SH TIME 1710
SAMPLING TIME = 130 MI MS
STfiCK SIZE :
RREA OF STfiCK =
r/il!_i_Ai_ITER3 COLLECTED s
WEIGHT COLLECTED =
7'd. IN
£3. £7 SF
Ufa. 5 ML_
100 MQ
CHRBON DIOXIDE
DXV3EN
CfiREON fiQNOXIDE
WITixQGEN
NOZZLE RREfl
HVG. SQUARE ROOT
fiVG. DELTH rl
AVG.
HV3.
DELTft P
nC
i HL-
EMPERflTURE
EMPERATURE
RIC PRESSURE
RESSURE
VOLUME OF METER flCTUflL
fiETER COEFFICIENT
vOLJME OF WflTER VfiPOR
VOLUi'lE OF METER STD.
FRACTION MOISTURE CONTEN
FRfiCTIOiM DRY HlR
MOLECULflR WEIGHT DRY
MOLECiJLfiR WEIGHT WET
EXCESS HlR
VEi_OCITY IN STfiCK
STfiCK FLOW fiCTUflL
STfiCK FL.OW STD
I30KINETIC3
C0£ =
0£ =
CO =
M£
i\iH =
DP =
DH =
TM =
TB =
PB =
PS ==
VM =
me =
VW =
vo =
cl. c! "/•
17. B %
0 %
30 %
\ , 3&35S3E-03
„ £4 1
.7 IN. WflTER
10.1. & 'r
8£a F
3 0 . £ 5 1 1\ . H G »
30. £SI;'\i. HG.
37,, 333 SCF
1 . 013
4. 07E SCF
64. 443 DScF
EH =
vs =
Qfl =
/•-,,—, __.
b:o —
ISO =
0. 04S3
£8. 56
536.14 %
3 b S 4 £ ft C F "
14173 SCFM
68. 64 "/.
SKHlM LOftDING STD
SRfilM LDfiDIMG fiCTUfiL
CDMCENTRftTIOiM
EMISSION RATE
EMISSION PER WILi-. BTU
SSfilNS/DSCF @ 50% EH
0. 0133 GR/DSuF
0, i207£ GR/ftCF
L.B/D3CF
0. 0000 i_3/!f;fl BTU
0.0777 GR/D3CF &50:
-------
ENGINEERIMS-SCIENCE
FftlRFftX,VIRGINIft
SAMPLh CftLUULflTIOMS FOR PftRTlCL.iL.fi7E STOCK TESTING
FILE NfifrE RC-MS-a
PLANT ID REICHHOLD CHEM
STfiCK ID CL3
DftTE 7/E4/S5
STfiRT TIME S320
FINISH TIl'^E i££i
SAMPLING TIME = 130 MI MS
STRCK SIZE s 7£ IN
HREfl OF 3THCK = £3.£7 SF
^ILLILITERS COLLECTEDs 16£.£ ML
WEIGHT COLLECTED = 100 MG
CHRBON DIOXIDE co<
OXYGEN OS
CfiRBON mui\,OXIDE CO
NITROGEN ' N£
MUZZLE RREft Nft
fiVG. SQUfiRE ROOT DELTfi P DP
fiVB. DELTH H Di-i
PivG. METER TEMPERfiTURE 7tt
fiVQ. STftCK TEmPERftTURE TS
BHROf'iETRIC PRESSURE PB
STfiCK PRESSURE PS
VGLuiiE OF IYIETER PC
f'lETER COEFFICIENT
£. £ %
17. 3 %
tf %
80 %
j. a >ifa3S8tEI~iZi3 iai:
. £3
£u 31 IN. UrtTER
3S.£9993 r
S£d F
30. 3 IN. HG.,
3 ii» j I i N M H G ~
156.
1 « i! i
VuLUMh Ur WftTER VfiPOK (VW)
VW = 0.84707 X ML
= 125. 04707 X I6£.
= 7.634754 BCF
VOLUME OF METER STD (VO)
VO = 17.64 X MC X VM X(PB + DH/13.6 )/TM
= 17-64 X 15S..S X ( 30„ 3 •+• £.31 /13, 6 )/ SSS,
= 153.£7I4 SCFD
FRHCTIOiM MOISTURE CONTENT
Bw - vW / < VO + VW>
= 7.634754 / ( 153.2714 -*• 7,, 634754 ) = 4. 744851
•4 FRfiCTION OF DRY SIR (FDfl)
-------
rlULhCULHR WEIGHT DRY (MD)
nD = „ 44 X COS -i- . 3£ X O£ +. £3 X ( CO + M£ )
= . 44 X 0 + . 3£ X 17.8 + . £8 X ( (3 + 80 >
£9.064
6 mQLECULftR WEIGHT WET (MS)
MS =(MD X FDA) -I- US X BW)
= ( £9.®64 X .95£5515 ) -i- (13 X 4. 744351 £-/»£ ) = £3.53503
EXCESS H.IR (Eft)
( (02-(. 5 X CO) ) X 100)
(.£64 X N£)-<0£ + .5 X CO)
( ( 17. 8 - (. 5 X 0 ) ) X 100)
(.£64 X 80 ) - ( 17.8 + .5 X 0 )
8 VELOCITY (VS)
V3 = 35.49 X .84 X DP X
= 43105.63 X ,95£5515 X(5£S/ l£8S )X( 30.30735 /£
17050.1 DSCFM
11 ISDKINETICS (ISO)
100 X TS X ((.002669 X ML)+(VO/17.64))
1C" f~i ___ ___««.«.«»-«__«_»._«»»».»«. — ™ —._.__-„.— _,_~™ __.™. .„
OLJ —
(TIME)(PS)(Nfi)(VS)(60)
100 X 1£8S X ((.002669 X 162.£ ) + ( 153.£714 / 17.64))
( 180 )( 30.30735 )( 1.3635S5E 03 )( £5., 41306 >(6®)
103.5819 '/.
-------
1£ GROINS PER DRY CUBIC FOOT CCS)
CS - ,01543 X i«G/VQ
= .01543 X 100 / 153. £714 = I „ 00671 iE-0d BR/D8CF
13 GROINS PER flCTUftL CUBIC FOOT (Cfl)
Cfl = CS X 17., £4 X PS X FDfl/'TS
1. 00S7llE--iZi£ X 17.64 X 30.30735 X . 95S5515 / I£68
= 3.98037SE-03 GR/ftCF
;4 CONCENTRATION CO
C = C 3/70138
I. i306711E-0£ / 7030 = 1. 43315SE-06 LB3/DSCF
15 EiMiSSIGN RfiTE IN LBS/hR (ER)
ER = CS X QS X .00357
= 1.006711£-02 X 17050.1 X .00857 - 1.471 LBS/HR
LS CORRECTION TO 50% EXCESS RIR -(.133 X 68 )-C.?5 X 0 )j/£i
= .0427S54 BR/DSCF @ 5&X EH
L~ POUNDS PER MILLION BTU'3 CE)
C X F X (£0. 9)
(£0.3-0£>
1.4331592-06 X 0 X (£0.9)
-------
PROCESS CYCLE
RCM51
EXHflUST GftS FLOW
RATE, DSCFM
SAMPLE VOLUME
COMPOUND
NAPHTHALENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ACENAPHTHENE
PHENANTHRENE
FLUORANTHENE
FLUORENE
PYRENE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
ANTHRACENE
MUI
1£8.
15£.
154.
178.
£0£.
166.
£0£.
£66.
178.
17300
14£. 605
ug #/DSCF PPBv
£
£
£
£
3
£
1
4
£
350
(£0)
(£0)
(£0)
(£0)
(£0)
(£0)
(£0)
(£0)
5. 41E-09
-3.09E-10
-3. 09E-10
-3. 09E-10
-3. 09E-10
-3. 09E-10
-3. 09E-10
-3. 09E-10
-3. 09E-10
16.
-0.
-0.
-0.
-0.
-0.
-0.
-0.
-0.
33
79
78
67
59
7£
59
45
67
#/HR
-0.
-0.
-0.
-0.
-0.
-0.
-0.
-0.
0. 01
0003£
0003£
0003£
0003£
0003£
0003£
0003£
0003£
-------
PROCESS CYCLE
RCM5£
EXHftUST GfiS FLOW
RflTE, DSCFM
SAMPLE VOLUME
COMPOUND
NAPHTHALENE
flCENflPHTHYLENE
17100
153.£71
MW ug #/DSCF PPBv #/HR
1£8. £ 130 1.87E-09 5.64 .00
15£. £ (£0) -£.88E-10 -0.73 -0.00030
OCENflPHTHENE
PHEIMftNTHRENE
FLUORftNTHENE
FLUORENE
PYRENE
PENTftCHLOROPHENOL
fiNTHRflCENE
154. £
178. £
£0£. 3
166. £
£0£. 1
£66.4
178. £
(£0) -£.88E-10
(£0) -£.88E-10
(£0) -£.88E-10
(£0) -£.S8E-10
(£0) -£.88E-liZi
(£0) -£.S8E-10
(£0) -£.88E-10
-0.7£ -0.00030
-0.6£ -0.00030
-0.55 -0.00030
-0.67 -0.00030
-0.55 -0.00030
-0. 4£ -0. 00030
-0.6£ -0.00030
-------
PROCESS CYCLE
EXHflUST GflS FLOW
RCM53
Rfllh, DSCFM
SftMPLE VOLUME
COMPOUND
NflPHTHflLENE
flCENflPHTHYLENE
ACENftPHTHENE
PHENANTHRENE
FLUORANTHENE
FLUORENE
PYRENE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
ANTHRACENE
MW
128.
152.
154.
178.
£02.
166.
£02.
£66.
178.
14200
84. 45
ug tt/DSCF PPBv
£
£
£
£
3
£
1
4
£
64
<£0)
(£0)
(£0)
(£0)
(£0)
(£0)
5,000
(£0)
1.
-5.
-5.
-5.
-5.
-5.
-5.
1.
-5.
67E-09
££E-10
££E- 1 0
££E-10
££E-10
££E-10
££E-10
31E-07
22E-10
5.
— 1
-1.
-1.
-1.
-1.
— 1
189.
-1.
04
33
31
13
00
22
00
62
13
4t/HR
-0.
-0.
-0.
-0.
-0.
-0.
0.
-0.
. 00
00044
00044
00044
00044
00044
00044
11121
00044
-------
(FT3)
0. 173
0. 178
0. 177
0. 18£
0. 18£
0. 18£
(FT3)
0. 173
0. 178
0. 177
0. 18£
0. 18£
0. 1S£
MEOH
1.
-0.
-0.
-0.
-0.
-0.
MEOH
1.
-0.
-0.
-0.
-0.
-0.
4
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
1
1
MflSS, rng
DMK
-0. 05
-0. 05
-0. 05
-0. 05
-0. 05
-0.05
MftSS, rng
DMK
-0.05
-0. 05
-0. 05
-0. 05
-0. 05
-0. 05
MEK
-0. 0£
-0. 0£
-0.0£
-0. 0£
-0. 0£
-0. 0£
MEK
-0. 0£
-0. 0£
-0. 0£
-0. 0£
-0.0£
-0.0£
Q, DSCFM
17300
17300
17300
17100
17100
17100
Q, DSCFM
1£900
1£900
1 £900
1£900
1£900
1£900
MEOH
IS. 51
- 1 . £9
-l.£9
-1. £5
-1.S5
-1. £4
MEOH
13. 81
-0. 96
-0. 96
-0. 94
-0. 94
-0. 94
PMR, #/HR
DMK
-0. 66
-0.64
-0. 65
-0. 6£
-0. 6£
-0. 6£
PMR,tt/HR
DMK
-0. 49
-0. 48
-0. 48
-0. 47
-0. 47
-0. 47
MEK
-12. £6
-0. £6
-0. £6
-0. £5
-0. £5
MEK
-0. £0
-0. 13
-0. 19
-0. 19
-0. 19
-0. 19
-------
C£2s CW9J
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
£1
£2
i37
RUN NUMBER
METER VOLUME, ACF
METER PRESS(DH), IN
METER TEMP., DEB. F
BRROM PRESS, IN HS
GAMMA
METER VOL-STD, DSCF
CONDENSATE, ML
WATER VAPOR, SCF
MOISTURE CONTENT, %
MOLECULAR WT, DRY
MOLECULAR WT, WET
-Mai—86 10:31 AM
RUN NUMBER
METER VOLUME, ACF
METER PRESS(DH), IN
METER TEMP., DEB. F
BAROM PRESS, IN HS
GAMMA
METER VOL-STD, DSCF
CONDENSATE, ML
WATER VAPOR, SCF
MOISTURE CONTENT, %
MOLECULAR WT, DRY
MOLECULAR WT, WET
RUN NUMBER
METER VOLUME, LITERS
METER VOLUME, ACF
METER PRESS., KB. F
99: (Fl) U CM93 96.7
Aie: CU20J 'BORON PRESS, IN H6
BIB: U CU9] 29.9
All: CN203 'fflWfl
Bll: (F3) U W91 1.W7
(11*: CH2B] 'METER VOL-STD, DSCF
BU: (F3) CM91 +B7*BHt(538/(B9H6e))*((B19»(B8/13.6))/29.92)
A1S: CIC8J 'COffiENSATE, N.
BIS: (Fl) U CW93 H5.8
flit: CU2U 'UATER VflPOR, SCF
B16i (F3) CU91 +B1M.W787
«7: OCB] 'MOISTURE CONTENT, *
B17: (PI) [U91 +B16/IB1&+B14)
S19: nCBl 'NOLECULflR HT, DRY
B19: CW91 28.84
tet: aen 'MOLECULAR HT, UET
K»: (fZI U CW9] 1B«B17+((1-B17)«619)
WPV WPV WPV WCV WCV WCV
IB £A 2B 1A IB 2A
60.779 73.376 74.512 52.666 47.046 36.822
0.75 1.56 1.70 1.02 0.71 1.27
95.9 85.2 94.8 90.3 78.0 94.2
29. 9 29. 9 29. 9 £9. 9 £9. 9 £9. 9
1.013 1.007 1.013 1.013 1.007 1.013
58.770 72.057 72.360 51.477 46. 7£1 35.759
470.3 416.4 448.7 227.9 198.8 196.1
22.137 19.600 21.120 10.727 9.358 9.230
27.4* 21.4% 22. 6X 17. 2% 16.7% £0.5%
28.84 28.84 28.84 28.84 28.84 £8.84
25. 87 26. 52 26. 39 26. 97 27. 03 26. 62
WPF-X WPF-X WCF-X WCF-X WCF-X
1A IB 1A 2A 2B
9.835 7.575 15.240 10.22 8.18
0.348 0.268 0.539 0.361 0.289
1.00 1.18 1.00 0.97 1.21
86.1 86.1 83.6 81.3 77.9
29. 90 £9. 90 29. 90 £9. 9 29. 9
0.951 0.955 0.951 0.951 0.955
WCV
£B
36. 326
1. 17
74. 6
£9. 9
1. 007
36. 346
213. 6
10. 054
£1.7%
£8. 84
£6. 49
METER VOL-STD, DSCF
0. 321
0. £49
0. 500
0.337
0. £73
-------
PROCESS CYCLE WCF-X-10F
EXHftUST BflS FLOW
RflTE, DSCFM
SflMPLE VOLUME
COMPOUND
NAPHTHflLENE
flCENflPHTHYLENE
ftCENflPHTHENE
PHENflNTHRENE
FLUORftNTHENE
FLUORENE
PYRENE
PENTftCHLOROPHENOL
flNTHRflCENE
MW
128.
152.
154.
178.
202.
166.
202.
266.
178.
4487. 08965
0.321
ug #/DSCF PPMv
2
2
2
2
3
2
1
4
2
3, 000
<10)
2,200
640
300
740
(10)
(10)
100
2.
-6.
1.
4.
2.
5.
"""&•
""&•
6.
06E-05
87E-08
51E-05
40E-06
06E-06
08E-06
S7E-08
87E-08
87E-07
62.
-0.
37.
9.
3.
11.
-0.
-0.
1.
20
17
92
55
94
83
13
10
49
#/HR
-0.
4.
1.
0.
1.
-0.
-0.
0.
5.55
01849
06781
18336
55470
36826
01849
01849
18490
-------
PROCESS CYCLE
EXHflUST GfiS FLOW
RflTE, DSCFM
SAMPLE VOLUME
COMPOUND
NAPHTHALENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ACENAPHTHENE
PHENANTHRENE
FLUORANTHENE
FLUORENE
PYRENE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
ANTHRACENE
WCF-X-2A
3763.36551
0.337
ug #/DSCF
PPMv
#/HR
128. £
152.2
154.2
178.2
202.3
166.2
202. 1
266.4
178.2
11,070
90
1,900
300
40
580
20
(10)
100
7.24E-05
5.89E-07
1.24E-05
1.96E-06
2.62E-07
3.79E-06
1.31E-I37
-6.54E-0S
6.54E-07
218.61 16.35
1.50 0.13294
31.19 2.80659
4.26 0.44315
0.50 0.05909
8.83 0.85675
0.25 0.02954
-0.10 -0.01477
1.42 0.14772
-------
PROCESS CYCLE WCF-X-£B
EXHflUST GflS FLOW
RflTE, DSCFM
SflMPLE VOLUME
COMPOUND
NflPHTHflLENE
flCENflPHTHYLENE
flCENflPHTHENE
PHENflNTHRENE
FLUORflNTHENE
FLUORENE
PYRENE
PENTflCHLOROPHENOL
flNTHRflCENE
MW
128.
152.
154.
178.
202.
166.
202.
266.
178.
3763. 36551
0.273
ug #/DSCF PPMv
2
2
2
2
3
2
1
4
2
1,200
60
1,500
130
(10)
340
(10)
(10)
20
9. 69E-06
4. 85E-07
1.21E-05
1.05E-06
-8. 08E-08
2. 75E-06
-8. 08E-0S
-8. 08E-08
1.62E-07
29.
1.
30.
2.
-0.
6.
-0.
-0.
0.
25
23
40
28
15
39
15
12
35
#/HR
0.
2.
0.
-0.
0.
-0.
-0.
0.
2. 19
10941
73516
23705
01823
61997
01823
01823
03647
-------
PROCESS CYCLE
EXHflUST BflS FLOW
RflTE, DSCFM
SftMPLE VOLUME
COMPOUND
NftPHTHflLENE
flCENflPHTHYLENE
flCENftPHTHENE
PHENflNTHRENE
FLUORftNTHENE
FLUORENE
PYRENE
PENTftCHLOROPHENOL
flNTHRACENE
WCV-lfl
34£
51.477
ug #/DSCF
PPMv
#/HR
128. £ £, 500, 000
152.£ £,400
154. £ 3,600
178.£ 1,400
£0£. 3 < 1,000)
166. £ 4,700
£0£. 1 (1, 000)
£66.4 (1,000)
178. £ <1,000)
1.07E-04
1.03E-07
1.54E-07
6.00E-08
-4.£8E-08
£.01E-07
-4.£8E-08
-4.£8E-08
-4.£8E-08
3£3. £0 £. £0
0.26 0.00£11
0.39 0.00316
0.13 0.001£3
-0.08 -0.00088
0.47 0.00413
-0.08 -0.00088
-0.06 -0.00088
-0.09 -0.00088
-------
PROCESS CYCLE
EXHflUST BfiS FLOW
RATE, DSCFM
SAMPLE VOLUME
COMPOUND
NftPHTHftLENE
ftCENflPHTHYLENE
ftCENfiPHTHENE
PHENflNTHRENE
FLUORflNTHENE
FLUORENE
PYRENE
PENTftCHLOROPHENOL
ftNTHRflCENE
WCV-Sft
MW
128.2
152. E
154.2
178.2
202.3
166.2
202. 1
266.4
178.2
319
35.759
ug #/DSCF
PPMv
#/HR
900, 000
8,200
40, 000
3,400
(1,000)
25,000
(1, 000)
(1,000)
(1,000)
5. 55E-05
5.06E-07
2.47E-06
2.10E-07
-6.17E-08
1.54E-06
-6.17E-08
-6.17E-08
-6.17E-08
167.50 1.06
1.29 0.00968
6.19 0.04720
0.46 0.00401
-0.12 -0.00118
3.59 0.02950
-0.12 -0.00118
-0.09 -0.00118
-0.13 -0.00118
-------
PROCESS CYCLE
EXHflUST BftS FLOW
RATE, DSCFM
SAMPLE VOLUME
COMPOUND
MW
WPF-X-1B
4478.04310
0. 489
ug #/DSCF
PPMv
tt/HR
NAPHTHALENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ACENAPHTHENE
PHENANTHRENE
FLUORANTHENE
FLUORENE
PYRENE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
ANTHRACENE
128.2
152.2
154.2
178.2
202.3
166.2
202. 1
266.4
178.2
200 9.02E-07
(10) -4.51E-08
10 4.51E-08
10 4.51E-08
(10) -4.51E-08
20 9.02E-08
(10) -4.51E-08
600 2.71E-06
(10) -4.51E-08
2. 72 0. 24
-0.11 -0.01211
0. 11 0.01211
0.10 0.01211
-0.09 -0.01211
0.21 0.02423
-0.09 -0.01211
3.93 0.72679
-0.10 -0.01211
-------
PROCESS CYCLE
EXHAUST GAS FLOW
RATE, DSCFM
SAMPLE VOLUME
COMPOUND
NAPHTHALENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ACENAPHTHENE
PHENANTHRENE
FLUORANTHENE
FLUORENE
PYRENE
PENTACHLOROPHENOL
ANTHRACENE
WPV-1A
MW
493
56.996
ug #/DSCF
PPMv
#/HR
128.2 2,000,000
152. S (1,000)
154.2 30,000
178.2 2,100
202.3 (1,000)
166.2 8,400
202. 1 (1, 000)
266.4 (1,000)
178.2 (1,000)
7.74E-05
-3.87E-08
1.16E-06
8.12E-08
-3.87E-08
3.25E-07
-3.87E-08
-3.87E-08
-3.87E-08
233. 53 2. 29
-0.10 -0.00114
2.91 0.03432
0.18 0.00240
-0.07 -0.00114
0.76 0.00961
-0.07 -0.00114
-0.06 -0.00114
-0.08 -0.00114
-------
PROCESS CYCLE
EXHflUST GflS FLOW
RflTE, DSCFM
SflMPLE VOLUME
COMPOUND
NflPHTHflLENE
flCENflPHTHYLENE
ftCENflPHTHENE
PHENflNTHRENE
FLUORftNTHENE
FLUORENE
PYRENE
PENTflCHLOROPHENOL
flNTHRflCENE
MM
128.2
152.2
154.2
178.2
202.3
166.2
202. 1
266.4
178.2
509
72. 057
ug #/DSCF
PPMv
#/HR
1, 000, 000
(1,000)
25, 000
1,700
(1, 000)
9,800
(1,000)
(1,000)
(1,000)
3.06E-05
-3.06E-0S
7.65E-07
5.20E-08
-3.06E-08
3.00E-07
-3.06E-08
-3.06E-08
-3.06E-08
92. 36 0. 93
-0.08 -0.00093
1.92 0.02336
0.11 0.00159
-0.06 -0.00093
0.70 0.00916
-0.06 -0.00093
-0.04 -0.00093
-0. 07 -0. 00093
------- |