^\/\RONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT
KLAMATH RIVER BASIN
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION
IREGION X-PACIFIC NORTHWEST & ALASKAI
1200 SIXTH AVENUE, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101
-------
Kodachrome
SLIDE
Kodachrome
SLIDE
Kodachrome 4-
SLIDE
Kodachrome
SLIDE
-------
WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT
KLAMATH RIVER BASIN
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION
-------
122°00
IO.A
IVER BASIN
42°00
Survclllmnc*
tlon
42°00'
I
122°30'
122-00
izroo'
-------
1/13
REGION 10 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT
A logical step-by-step approach is needed to identify and abate nonpoint
sources of pollution within Region 10. The first step must be to assess the
magnitude and extent of the nonpoint source problem.
Region 10 has developed a water quality assessment approach which will
assist EPA planners, land agencies, and state and local agencies in identifying
probable nonpoint sources and determining their effects upon the "fishable-
swimmable" aspect of Regional streams.
Generally the approach is to determine the biological, recreational, and
water quality status of Regional streams and to display each status on color
coded STORET basin maps. This information is to be related to land use and
land ownership (also on basin maps) as well as other factors such as hydro-
modifications, river flows, mining activities, and point source discharges.
All this information is then systematically organized on a summary table
which can be easily used.
This package contains information for one river basin within Region 10.
The package consists of the following:
1. Five slides of the maps used in the evaluation of the basin.
2. A flow chart showing the phased assessment procedure.
3. A summary table for the basin and a detailed description of
information on the table.
4. A basin point source discharge listing by segment number.
5. Specific information for biological and recreational status.
The STORET basin map is used as the base map for all status evaluations.
Each map is overlayed by a transparency that contains segment basin boundaries
representing drainage areas associated with segments defined by each state
within the Region. These segment boundaries are used as the basis for
assessing water and land information.
-------
2/13
Biological status information is obtained from field biologists represent-
ing state and federal fish and game agencies. Their judgment is based upon a
set of criteria shown on Table 1. The biological status map (slide //I) shows
the results of this assessment.
Recreational status (slide #2) is obtained from field biologists, fish-
ermen, swimmers, and recreational specialists utilizing the criteria identi-
fied in the Table Explanation.
Slide #3 shows the water quality station locations in each segment.
STORET was used as a basis for all water quality data since most state and
federal agencies and many local agencies and universities store data in Region
10. The number associated with each point on the map references a STORET
printout page number. Data was retrieved utilizing the STORET standards
flagging program with EPA's Water Quality Criteria as the threshold levels.
Selected water quality threshold and violation screening criteria are shown
and defined in the Table Explanation.
Slides #4 and #5 show land use and land ownership throughout the STORET
basin. The source of this information is from land management agencies.
All the information previously discussed and shown on maps is summarized
on the River Basin tables. Information on these tables is arranged by segment
in an upstream to downstream order beginning at the upper end of each STORET
basin.
The information obtained and compiled using this procedure is general;
however, it indicates probable cause and effect relationships related to land
use and land ownership. The backup information on field tables, STORET print-
outs and maps allows the user to make more detailed evaluations. Specific
information gathering investigations in problem areas would be necessary for
an accurate "cause and effect" picture.
-------
3/13
This evaluation process is still evolving and is continually being im-
proved based on field verifications and comments from users. If you have
specific questions on the procedures used in these evaluations, please
contact Bill Schmidt, Chief, Water Surveillance and Investigation Section,
Surveillance and Analysis Division, Region 10 (TelephoneFTS 399-1210).
-------
4/13
REGION 10 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT
Region 10
Present Water Quality
f land use upon the Biological, R
Effect of
Quality of Regional streams
Assessment
ecreational, and Water
fins
STORET River Uasln Approach
1) STORET basin base maps
2) Reiterative process until all basins are complete
3) Land use and ownership plotted on base map
Stream Segment Identification
1) Drainage basin associated with segment
2) Segments identified by States (further
breakdown may be necessary)
Phase I Segment Information
1) Segment length 4) Mining
2) Ilydrologic data 5) Hydronodification
3) Point Sources
Phase II BTol
ogical Status
1) Develop criteria
2) Contact field biologists for status
3) Develop backup table and color coded maps
Phase"III Recreational Status
1) Develop criteria (contact & noncontact)
2) Contact water users, recreation agencies,
etc.
3) Develop backup table and color coded naps
Phase IV Water Quality Status
1) Select screening parameters
2) Select Federal criteria & data adequacy
criteria
3) STORET retrieval using Standards Flagging
Program
4) Develop station distribution map & backup
violation printouts
Phase V Land Use & Ownership Status
1) Determine Z use and ownership considering
grazing, silviculture, agriculture, urban
uses and Federal, State, Indian, and prl-
vate lands _
STORET River Baein Summary Table
1) Including all data from segments (Phases I thru V)
2) Table to be used in decision making process _
~~'' ' " "'
.
Field Verification ot Phases II thru V
1) Areas to be selected on a random basis
T..~""._iv'"rj" "~ nrzzir
Region and State Decision Making Process
I
K
a
r-l
2
°
Information fron this process may be used for the following:
1) Data needs Identification
2) Prioritize work areas and programs by basin. State, land
use, ownership, etc.
3) W.Q. standards review
4) Assess waters presently meeting 19fl3 goals of "fishable swim-
mable"
3) Determine effect of and/or needs for hydromodificntion
6) Assess the "cause and effect" relationships of various land
uses and therefore BMFs.
1) Assist Federal, State, and private agencies in Identifying
problems
8) Base study to support future abatement program success assess-
ment
-------
5/13
The field biolopist utilizes the following evaluation natrix in deteminin* strear> secr-ent status classification,
BIOLOGICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA
TABLE I
^^^--^TIME & SEVERITY
:RITERIA FOR ----^FACTORS
BIOLOGICAL EVALUAT!ON~ -^_
1. Destruction of habitat for
indigenous specias - passage,
spawning, rearing.
II. Int eruption of total food chain
III. Interference with the wall
being of indigenous species of
fish or food chain organism*.
Duration of Adverse Condition
NEVER-INTERMITTENT-conTnnioup
Ked
Severity of Adverse Condition
.
Period of Biological Activity
vn>* m TTT CAT
31ue/vellow
Yallow
Ked
Cn-i-X L. CAii
Red
Tied
T*ad
NOTE: The color-code (blue, yellow, and red) is used on the maps (see slides).
On the summary tables, a pattern-code was used to allow for easier duplication.
Therefore: Blue corresponds to: ?!!*''
Yellow corresponds to:
Red corresponds to:
-------
6/13
TABLE EXPLANATION
River:
Segment Number:
Sub-basin Information
Sub-basin: Each "STORET" major river basin is divided into minor river basins based on major
tributaries to the main stream. Each sub-basin is further subdivided into segments,
In the table the segments and sub-basins appear in an upstream to downstream order.
The major river or stream and its tributaries in the segment being classified
are listed.
The reach of the river under consideration, including the hydrologic drainage
area that contributes flow to that reach, is designated by number for the pur-
poses of identification and cross-referencing. This number will generally be
the state assigned alpha-numeric code except where a finer division is necessary
in giving a more accurate description of the area.
The area of the entire segment being described is given in square miles.
Annual average, maximum, and minimum discharge (in cfs) are given for the major
stream or reach in each segment where USGS flow records are available.
The upper and lower river miles of the stream or reach in each segment as well
as the river mile of the confluence with the next lowest order stream is given.
For instance, the Powder River (length 145 miles), which enters the Snake River
at river mile 296, is described under "R.M. Range" as:
296/
145-0
Segment Length: The length, in miles, of the reach of the major stream in each segment is given.
Environmental Information
Drainage Area:
Flow:
River Mile Range:
Significant Discharger:
The number of significant dischargers, as determined by EPA S&A Region X, is
noted under the appropriate column, being either Municipal (M) or Industrial (I)
-------
7/13
Hydro-modification:
Mining:
Water Use:
Biological Status;
Agricultural (irrigation diversions or returns), reservoirs, channel realign-
ment, or other changes in the natural flow of the stream under consideration
are identified.
I = Agricultural Modifications
R = Reservoir Modification (Number of reservoirs having a total capacity of
5,000 acre-feet or more)
C = Channel Realignment, Revetments, etc.
0 = Other
Where specific data is available, the numerical extent of the hydromodification
is noted as a number after the letter abbreviation. Where numerical information
is lacking, a qualitative notation of extent is used. A '+' means there is
extensive modification of that type in the segment, no symbol after the letter
means it is present, and no letter means its presence is at most negligible.
Present or active (A) mining operations and past or non-active (N) mining opera-
tions are identified for each segment.
A general description of the present water uses in the segment is given. Pwr -
power; Rec - recreation; Ag - agriculture; F+W - fish and wildlife; Mun - muni-
cipal; M+I - municipal and industrial; Ind - industrial; Nav - navigation.
This is a qualitative assessment of biological conditions in the streams of that
particular segment.
Solid Black - (corresponds to red on map) - water environment is unsuitable for
a healthy biological community.
Diagonal Stripes - (yellow on map) - a questionable or intermittedly unhealthy
environment exists.
Dots - (blue on map) - a good environment exists for the biota.
Blank Space - (green on map) - insufficient data is available for evaluation.
Determination of the biological status was carried out by experienced, knowledg-
able biologists associated witli various federal and state agencies who are
familiar with the streams in the river segments. Table 1 outlines the criteria
used for the biological evaluations. Evaluations are limited to major streams.
In general, these include firai through second or third order streams for rivers
near the seacoast and first through fourth order for inland streams. A certain
amount of subjective judgment has been used, however, as to whether to include
-------
Biological Status
(cont):
Recreational Status:
Water Quality Status
(Parametric Coverage):
certain higher order streams. Whether a certain higher order stream falls within
the just mentioned bounds is not in itself justification for inclusion. Its size
and significance are also taken into account.
This is the qualitative assessment of water related recreational use for each
segment. The criteria used for evaluation of recreational status was based on
typical year-round use. Two major categories were considered: (1) contact
recreation (swimming), and (2) non-contact recreation (boating, fishing, and
aesthetics).
Dots - (corresponds to blue on map) - popular areas, few complaints registered,
wide diversity of socio-economic uses in evidence.
Diagonal Stripes - (yellow on map) - part-time use due to water management, sea-
sonal water quality and quantity conditions, seasonal accessibility, etc.
Solid Black - (red on map) - no use in areas where that use should normally exist.
Blank Space - (green on map) - insufficient data for evaluation.
The stream order criteria for inclusion in the evaluation are the same as for
biological status.
An assessment of the water quality data available in each of the segments is given.
All data used in the analysis and evaluation is available in EPA's "STORET" System.
A group of twelve basic parameters is used in assessing the water quality in each
segment.
Parameter
Temperature (T)
Dissolved Oxygen
(DO)
Criteria
Threshold Level/Units
20°C (68°F) MAX
6 mg/1 MIN
90% SAT MIN
Environmental Impact and Reference
To protect growth and migration routes of salmonids
(Federal Water Pollution Control Administration (FWPCA),
Water Quality Criteria, 1968).
For good growth and the general well-being of trout,
salmon, and other species of cold water biota, DO con-
centrations should not be below 6 mg/1 (FWPCA, Water
Quality Crjjteria.. 1968). In addition, state water
quality standards normally require 90% saturation for
dissolved oxygen (Idaho and Oregon).
-------
9/13
Parameter
Dissolved Gas (TDG)
Criteria
Threshold Level/Units
110% SAT MAX
pH (pH)
6.5 MIN
8.5 MAX
Turbidity (Turb)
25 JTU MAX
Environmental Impact and Reference
To prevent fish fatalities by "gas bubble disease" in
which dissolved gases in their circulatory system come
out of solution to form bubbles (emboli) which block
the flow of blood through the capillary vessels (Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Quality Criteria for
Water, 1976).
The pH range which is not directly lethal to fish is
5-9. However, the toxicity of several common pollu-
tants is markedly affected by pH changes within this
range, and increasing acidity or alkalinity may make
these poisons more toxic. Therefore, a pH range of
6.5 to 9.0 is desirable to protect freshwater aquatic
life (EPA, Quality Criteria for Water, 1976). In pri-
mary contact recreation waters, the pH should be within
the range of 6.5-8.3 except when due to natural causes
to prevent the possibilities of eye irritations in
humans (FWPCA, Water Quality Criteria, 1968). State
pH standards range from 6.5 to 9.0 for Idaho and 6.5
to 8.5 for Oregon and Washington. In light of the
above information, our criteria have been set at 6.5
to 8.5.
Most state standards have a turbidity standard of "not
to exceed 5 JTU over background or natural conditions".
It is, however, rather ambiguous what "background or
natural conditions" are. Also, this type of standard
does not relate to the fishable/swimmable concept.
Excessive turbidity reduces photosynthesis by aquatic
plant life and damages the spawning grounds of fish and
habitat of aquatic invertebrates. It has been observed
that maximum production in hatchery ponds and reservoirs
occurred where the average turbidity was less than 25
JTU (Buck, D.H., 1956. Effects of turbidity on fish
and fishing. In: 21st North Amer. Wildlife Conf. Trans.)
-------
10/13
Parameter
Phosphorus (Phos)
Nitrate Nitrogen
(N)
Ammonia Nitrogen
(NH3)
Criteria
Threshold Level/Units
Total 0.05 mg/l-P
Total 0.15 mg/l-P04
Ortho 0.025 mg/l-P
Ortho 0.075 mg/l-PO,
Diss. Ortho 0.01 mg/l-P
0.30 mg/l-N
1.33 mg/l-N03
Un-ionized 0.02 mg/l-N
Total 0.20 mg/l-N
Total 0.26 mg/l-NH4
Environmental Impact and Reference
Limited studies made to date indicate that different
species of algae have somewhat different phosphorus
requirements with the range of available phosphorus
usually falling between 0.01 and 0.05 mg/1 as P. At
these levels, when other conditions are favorable,
blooms may be expected. While there is no set rela-
tionship between total and available phosphorus (be-
cause the ratio varies with season, temperature, and
plant growth), the total phosphorus is governing as it
is the reservoir that supplies the available phosphorus.
A desirable guideline for total phosphorus is 0.05 mg/1
as P where streams enter lakes or reservoirs (FWPCA,
Water Quality Criteria, 1968). The other criteria
levels for different units and forms of phosphorus
have been determined by unit conversion and relation-
ships found between the phosphorus forms in Region 10.
The other forms of phosphorus are used as indicators
only when data for total phosphorus is lacking.
Mackenthun cited results indicating that inorganic
nitrogen at 0.30 mg/1 and inorganic phosphorus at
0.01 mg/1, at the start of an active growing season,
subsequently permitted algal blooms (Mackenthun, K.M.,
1965. Nitrogen and phosphorus in water. U.S. Depart-
ment of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health
Service.).
The amount of un-ionized ammonia is very much dependent
upon pH, temperature, and concentration of total ammonia.
A maximum level of 0.02 mg/1 as un-ionized ammonia is
recommended to minimize toxicity to freshwater aquatic
life (EPA, Quality Criteria for Water. 1976). Concen-
trations of total ammonia above 0.20 mg/1 as N are indi-
cative of organic pollution (Klein, River Pollution 1.,
Chemical Analysis, 1959).
-------
11/13
Parameter
Bacteria (Bact)
Criteria
Threshold Level/Units
Total Coliform 1000/100 ml
Fecal Coliform 240/100 ml
Dissolved Solids
Conductivity
(Cond)
TDS 500 mg/1
Cond. 750 umho/cm
Pesticide Toxicity
(OTOX)
Aidrin
Dieldrin
Chlordane
DDT
Endrin
Heptachlor
Lindane
Malathion
Parathion
.003 ug/1
.003 ug/1
.010 ug/1
.001 ug/1
.004 ug/1
.001 ug/1
.010 ug/1
.100 ug/1
.040 ug/1
Environmental Impact and Reference
Total and fecal coliform are microbiological indicators
used to determine or indicate the safety of water for
drinking, swimming, and shellfish harvesting. A fecal
coliform log mean of 200 per 100 ml for bathing waters
and 14 per 100 ml for shellfish harvesting waters is
recommended by Quality Criteria for Water, EPA, 1976.
State standards -range from 240 total/50 fecal per 100
ml for primary contact recreation in Idaho, 1000 total
per 100 ml in Oregon for general beneficial use, and
1000 total per 100 ml in Washington for Class B general
recreation. From the above discussion, the suggested
criteria level based on general recreation is 1000 per
100 ml for total coliform and 240 per 100 ml for fecal
coliform.
High levels of dissolved solids are a hazard for irri-
gation water. A maximum level of 500 mg/1 is indicated
for water from which no detrimental effects will usu-
ally be noticed. For domestic water supply, the maxi-
mum level is 250 mg/1 (EPA, Quality Criteria for Water,
1976). A relationship exists betweeen dissolved solids
and conductivity where total dissolved solids = .6 to
.3 times the conductivity.
The following criteria levels are recommended to protect
the freshwater aquatic life (EPA, Quality Criteria for
Water, 1976).
-------
J37T3
Heavy Metals (Met)
Metal
Boron
Criteria
Threshold Level
750 ug/1
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
3 ug/1
50 ug/1
20 ug/1
30 ug/1
0.2 ug/1
Zinc
80 ug/1
Environmental Impact
For long term irrigation, a maximum level of 750 ug/1
is recommended for sensitive crops
Harmful to eggs and larvae of salmon in hard water
Mixed aquatic populations protected
96 hour TLijQ to Chinook salmon in soft water was
31 ug/1 at hatch and 18 ug/1 at 1 month old
Aquatic life protected
Selected species of fish and predatory aquatic
organisms protected
Algalcidal concentration for Selenastrum Capriconutum
Reference
1
1
2
1
1
References:
1. EPA R3.73.033, Ecological Research Series, Water Quality Criteria 1972,
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1973.
2. EPA, Quality Criteria for Water, 1976.
3. Green, et. al., Report to Region X on the Results of the Spokane River
Algal Assays, 1973.
-------
13/13
The environmental status per each parameter per segment is found by determining the percentage of samples
that are in violation of the particular threshold level. This percentage is then weighted according to
the annual sample size for each segment as follows:
Status Code Class Percent Violations
Number of Samples/Year/Segment/Parameter
More than 20 11 to 20 4 to 10
Solid Black Not Acceptable 51-100% Viol. 61-100% Viol. 71-100% Viol.
Diagonal Stripes Objectionable 11-50% 21-60% 31-70%
Dots Acceptable 0-10% 0-20% 0-30%
No code at all (blank space) indicates insufficient data for evaluation.
The data used for this evaluation is for the period beginning January 1, 1970 until the date of the report,
For each station, parameters with less than 4 samples per year are not used.
Water Quality Status (Station/Data Statistics)
Number of Stations - Actual number of stations within each segment that had at least one parameter
with 4 or more samples per year.
Number of Samples/Parameter - Number of samples per year for each parameter averaged for all
parameters sampled.
Data Adequacy - This determination was made by evaluating the distribution of stations, amount of
data, and in some cases adequacy of parametric coverage versus known environmental quality problems.
+ denotes adequate data
- denotes indadequate data
3. % Land Ownership
The figure in each column represents the percentage of total area within each segment under the
jurisdiction of the noted groups.
4. % Land Use
The figure in each column represents the percentage of total area within each segment that is used for
the various purposes listed.
-------
IKLAMATH RIVER BASIN NOVEMBER YEAR - 1976
Sub-basin Information
Su b basin
WIL-
LIAMSOf
River
WOOD R,
AGENCY
L, CRAT-
ER L.
SPRAGUE
SYCAN
src. to
mouth
WIL-
LIAMSON
src. to
Klam. L
U.KLAM.
L.KLAM-
ATH R.
to bord
OOSE L
OST R.
regon
ortion
Seg. #
CM
O
03
0
1
D3
CO
O
CD
rl
O
1
03
un
o
i
03
Drain
Area
O
CM
O
00
< 1
o
to
,-H
o
0
CM
t 1
o
CO
t 1
cfs
Flow
xlO}
.17
.26
.10
.66
2.4
.25
1.26
3.49
.60
2.18
5.63
.38
R.M. Range
17-0
ll/
84-0
71/
71/0
93-0
250-
208
66-4
Se9
-engl
17
84
71
93
42
62
Environmental Information
M
o
VI
M 1
1
'
-o
o
E
t
0
TJ
1 +
1+
1+
1 +
5R
1+
4R
ot
"c
'f
N
Water Use
Ag
F+W
Rec
Ag
F+W
Rec
Ag
F+W
Rec
Ag Ind
Pwr
F+W
Rec
Ag
F+W
Rec
WATER QUALITY
^^H
Bio
Sta
**
**
1
1
1
1
|
Reel
St al
I
1
r
1
^
j.
_-^
i>
j-
*
1 T
JDO
1 TOG
pH
Turb
Phos
T
DO
TDG
pH
Turb
Phos
T
DO
TDG
pH
Turb
Pros
T
= acceptable
= ob]ectionable
= not acceotable
parometers
_-_ -V
N
NH3
Bact
Met
Cond
OTox
N
NH3
Bact
Met
Corid
OTox
N
NH3
Bact
Met
Cond
OTox
N
TDG [
p H ^^^^^^J
Turb LVlvIv
^mm
DO
TDG
pH
Turb
Phos
T
DO
TDG
pH
Turb
Phos
ur
DO
TOG
pH
Turb
Phos
T
DC
^>^V
vvvV
Bact
Met
Cond
OTox
N
NH3
Bact
Met
Cond
.v.v
oooc
___._._«
. . .
OTox|
N
NH3
Bact
ii
^^^
Xv>N
Cond
OTox
N
NH3
Bact
Met
Cond
OTox
N
NH3
TDG JBact
pH LV.V.M Ml: '
T^rb I [cond
^
****/
XvV^
i
d
0
0
1
6
2
E
11
50
11
w
D
0 ff
o-S
Q<
-
-
-
-
-
V. Land
Ownershf
C-)
38
66
56
22
35
eo
1
1
19
18
o_
23
3
3
4
2
1
on.
Q.
co
35
33
a
b8
47
yi Land Use
c
0
JJ
1
1
1
22
9
8
9
o
0)
c
o
Of
4
23
2
8
38
o
o
50
66
85
59
34
«
"5
e
12
11
4
TJ
C
O
a
6
2
5
1
c
O
4
1
1 Tundra
2
0
6
t
O
C
I/I
-------
** U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION flGtNcV **
** REGION X **
** SURVEILLRNCE HND RNHLVSIS DIVISION **
T COMO I T I OlsIS
OR
LOCHT1ON
STflTE
CNTV CODE
DIST OFF
FRC TVPE
SIC CODE =-
NOTES
OTHER MONITORING REGD:
RESIDUHL-DHILV GRRBS.
Kl_FH1F»TH
KI.HMHTH FHLLS
OR
035
02
11
KLfiMRTH
MHJOR BRSIN
MINOR BRSIN
1ST LEVEL MILE= 251. 50
2ND LEVEL MILE=
3RD LEVEL MILE=
PERMIT EXPIRES- 78/02/31
INFLUENT PH-3 GRRBS/WtEK, CHLORINE
THIS MUNICIPAL DISCHARGE IS LOCATED IN SEGMENT KB-01
r> x
R- JL
DHTE RRHGE
********************
75/86/01 TCI /t./10/31
7S/11/01 TO .'6/85/31
7C./06/01 TO 76/10/31
RECIEVING WRTER= KLRMRTH RIVER
LHT- 42-13-00 LONG= 121-47-31
TRT CODE= RS POP EQ= 16000
PHRRMETEK DESCRIPTION MINIMUM
*************************** ********
I'M 6. 00
BOD I1G/L
FECflL COLII-ORM PER 100ML
SUSPENDED SOLIDS MG/L
FLOW MUD
BOD LBS/DHV
SUSPENDED SOLIDS LBS/DflV
BOD MG/L
FECflL COLIFORH PER 1OOML
SUSPENDED SOLIDS MG/L
FLOW MGD
BOD LBS/DflV
SUSPENDED SOLIDS LBS/DflV
PH
BOD MG/L
FECflL COL I FORM PER 1OOML
SUSPEHDtD SOLIDS MG/L
FLOW MGD
BOD LBS/DflV
SUSPENDED SOLIDS LBS/DHV
6. 00
&.
'ERRGE
20. 0
288
20. 0
6. 000
1000
1008
30 0
208
30. 8
6. 008
1588
1560
20 0
200
20. 8
£. 000
1000
1088
MHXIMUM E
9. 60
2000
2000
9. 00
3000
3066
9. 00
2000
2800
XC TVPE
GRRB
COMP
GRRB
COMP
REC
COMP
COMP
GRRB
COMP
GRflB
COMP
REC
COMH
COMP
GRHB
COMP
GRHB
COMP
REC
COMP
COMP
FkEQ
3/WEEK
2/WEfc.K
I/WEEK
2/WEEK
DfllLV
2/WEEK
2/WEEK
3/WEEK
2/WEEK
1/WtEK
2/WEEK
DfllLV
2/WtEK
2/WEEK
3/WEEK
2/WEE.K
I/WEEK
2/WEEK
DfHILV
2/WEEK
2/WEEK
DflTR SOURCb
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PEKMI'I COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
-------
** U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY **
** REGION X **
** SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION **
I T COMC-I T I OMS
or*
LOCATION -
STATE
CNTV CODE=
DIST OFF =-
FAC TYPE =
SIC CODE =
NOTES
NO FLOW LI MS NOVl-MAVjSl.
3 GRUBS/WEEK
APPROXIMATE.
KLAHATH FALLS
OR
635
62
11
SOUTH SUBI_JRB<=»sl
MAJOR BASIN = KLAMATH
MINOR BASIN
1ST LEVEL MILE= 250. 20
2ND LEVEL MILE=
3RD LEVEL MILE°=
PERMIT EXPIRES= 76/03/JS0
I TFtR'V O I STR; I OT
THIS MUNICIPAL DISCHARGE IS LOCATED IN SEGMENT KB-01
OTHER MONITORING REQD: INFLUENT PH-
CHLORINt RESIDUAL-DAILY GRABS. RIVER MILES
DATE RANGE
7S/06/01 TO 75/10/31
7S/11/01 TO /6/05/31
76/06/01 TO 76/09/30
RECIEVING WATER= KLAMATH RIVER
LAT= 42-11-36 LOHQ= 121-45-43
TRT CODE~ LA POP EQ= 16900
PARAMETER DESCRIPTION
PH
BOD MG/L
FECAL COL I FORM PER 1OOML
SUSPENDED SOLIDS MG/L
FLOW MOD
t!OD LBS/DAY
SUSPENDED SOLIDS LBS/DAY
MINIMUM AVERAGE
6. 00
50. 0
200
60. 0
2. 200
835
1060
MAXIMUM
9. 00
1770
2000
EXC TYPE
GRAB
COMP
GRAB
COMP
REC
COMP
COMP
FREQ
3/WEEK
2/WEEK
I/WEEK
2/WEEK
DAILY
2/WEEK
2/WEEK
DATA SOURCE
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PI!
BOD MG/L
FECAL COL I FORM PER 1OOMI
SUSPENDED SOLIDS MG/L
BOD LBS/DAV
SUSPENDED SOLIDS LBS/DAV
PH
BOD MG/L
KECAL COL I FORM PER 10OML
SUSPENDED SOLIDS MG/L
FLOW MGD
BOD LBS/DAY
SUSPENDED SOLIDS LBS/DAV
6. 00
6. 00
50. 0
200
60 0
S85
1060
50. 0
200
60 0
2. 200
835
1060
9. 00
1770
2000
3. 00
1770
2000
GRAB
COMP
GRAB
COMP
COMP
COMP
3/WEEK
2/WEEK
I/WEEK
2/WEEK
2/WE.EK
2/WEEK
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT CCHD
PERMIT COND
PERMIT CONO
GRAB
COMP
GRAB
COMP
REC
COMP
COMP
3/WEEK
2/WtEK
1/WEEK
2/WEEK
DAILY
2/WEEK
2/WEEK
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT CONL-
PEKMIT CONO
PERMIT COND
-------
** U. S. ENVIRONMENTRL PROTECTION fiGENCV **
** REGION X **
** SURVEILLANCE RND RNRLYSIS DIVISION **
R-Epai'l I T COMl> I ~T 1
OR
LOCRT10N -
STRTE
CNTV CODE-
DIST OFF ^ 62
FHC TVPE - I
SIC CODE = 2421
NOTES
CO.
KLFHMRTH FRLLS
OR
635
MflJOR BRSIN - KLRMRTH
HI NOR BRSIN
1ST LEVtL I1ILE= 246. 58
2Nt> LEVtL MILE-
3RD LEVEL HILE=
PERMIT EXPIRES= 79/03/31
THIS INDUSTRIAL DISCHARGE IS LOCATED IN SEGMENT KB-01
J SCHl-
DRTE RHNGE
***:***:**:tc:*:*--4:*:***
7J./32/12 TO 73/83/31
RECIEVING WRTER^ KLRMRTH RIVER
LHT^ 42-69-44 LONG- 121-50-80
TRT CODE- POP EQ=
PHRRMtTER DESCRIPTION
PH
80D MG/L
SUSPENDED SOLIDS MG/L
FLOW MGD
TEMPEkfllURt FHHRtNHhIT DEG-F
BOD LBS/DRV
SUSPENDED SOLIDS LBS/DRV
MINIMUM
6. 00
flVERRGE
30. 0
30 0
556
7C.0
MRXIMUM
9. 68
11. 600
115. 8
1506
2106
EXC TVPE
GRflB
GRflB
GRflB
REC
GRflB
GRflB
GRHB
FREQ
DRILV
1/WKEK
I/WEEK
DRILV
DHILV
2/WEEK
2/WEEK
DflTH SOURCE
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
t>
DfllL RflNQE
4:^!fc:^:>:^4::4:*-t:*:^**^^^4-"^^:
75/02/12 TO 73/83/31
RECIEVING WRTER= KLRMHTH RIVtR
LflT^ 42-10-05 LONG= 121-49-08
TRT CODE= POP EQ=
PflRRME'lER DESCRIPTION
PH
FLOW MGD
TEMPERRTURE FRHKENHEIT DEG-F
MINIMUM
*******:*
6. 08
MRXIMUM
**:*:«****
9. 60
11. 600
115. O
EXC
TVPE FREG
^:+=** *:4<*:*:+:
REC DRILV
REC DRILV
GRflB DRILV
Dfllfl SOURCE
***+:+:*+*:f.it;:+:
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COHD
PERMIT COND
DRTE RHNGt
it-.****:*:.*:************--*:
75/82/12 TO 79/03/31
REC I EV IMG WHTER= KLflMHTH R VIR 081 DITCH
LHT= - - LONG= - -
TkT CODt= POP EQ-
PRRRMEThR DESCRIPTION
5t=+:t:*+****Mci+.-!t!**:t:sf:*^;!44*Jtt*-4:**
PH
BOD MG/L
FECRL COL I FORM PER 100ML
SUSPENDED SOLIDS MG/L
COD LBS/DRV
SUSPENDED SOLIDS LBS/DRV
MINIMUM
6. 86
RVERRGb
20. 0
200
30. 0
31
31
HRXIMUM
3. eti
EXC
TVPE KREQ
GRHB
GRflB
GRRH
GRHB
GRflB
GRRB
DRILV
I/WEEK
1/311 r H
I/WEEK
I/WEEK
1/WEtK
DflTfl SOURCE
st::*:*.-*:**:*:**::*::*
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
-------
** U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION RGENCV **
** REGION X **
** SURVEILLRNCE RND RNRLVSIS DIVISION **
T COMOITIOMS
OR
LOCRTION - KLRHRTH KftLLS
STHTE - OR
CNTV CODE= 635
DIST OFF - 62
FRC TVPE - H
SIC CODE -
NOTES
OTHER MONITORING REQD:
RESIDURL-DH1LV GRflBS.
Kk_<=»l--|«TH COUMT'V SCHOOL. D I ST MECMiE'i'
MRJOR BRSIN =
MINOR BRSIN
1ST LEVEL MILt=
2ND LEVEL MILE=
3RD LEVEL MILE-
PERMIT EXPIRES*'
KLRMRTH
LOST RIVfcR
025. 60
79/03/31
INFLUENT PH-3 GRRBS/WtEK, CHLORINE
THIS MUNICIPAL DISCHARGE IS LOCATED IN SEGMENT KB-05
DftTE RRKGE
4:H"^H:!4:^«^4: **
TO .'
rS/11/01 TO V'6/65/31
T'C/06/01 TO
RECIEVING WHTER= DITCH TO LOST RIVtR
LRT= - - LONG= - -
TRT CODE= LR POP EQ'- 1360
PRRHMETER DESCRIPTION MINIMUM
*************************** ********
PH 6 00
BOD MG/L
FECRL COLIFORM PER 1OOML
SUSPENDED SOLIDS MG/L
FLOW MOD
I :OD LBS/DRV
SUSPENDED SOLIDS LBS/DHV
BOD MG/L
FECRL COLIFORM PER 1OOML
SUSPENDED SOLIDS MG/L
FLOW MGD
BOD LBS/DfHV
SUSPENDED SOLIDS LBS/DRV
PH 6. 00
BOD MG/L
FECRL COLIFORM PER 1OOML
SUSPENDED SOLIDS MG/L
FLOW MGD
BOD LBS/DRV
SUSPENDED SOLIDS LBS/DHV
flVERRGE
HRXIMUM
9. 00
20. 0
200
30. 0
0. 020
3
5
30 0
200
30 0
@. 032
3
S
20. 0
260
30. 0
0. 026
3
5
45. 0
7
10
16
IS
9. 00
45. 0
7
16
EXC
TVPE
****
GRRE
COMP
COMP
COMP
REC
COMP
COMP
COMP
COMP
COMP
REC
COMP
COMP
GRRB
COMP
COMP
COMP
REC
COMP
COHP
FREt!
******
1/3MTH
1/UI1TH
1/3111 H
1/3MTH
DRILV
1/3MTH
1/3MTH
1/3MTH
1/3MTH
1/3I1TH
Dfl I LV
1/3MTH
1/3MTH
3/WEEK
1/3MTH
1/3MTH
1/iMTH
DRILV
1/3MTH
1/3I1TH
DRTH SOURCE
***********
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
COND
COND
COND
COND
COHD
COHD
COND
COND
COND
COND
COND
COND
COND
COND
CUND
COND
COND
COND
COND
COND
-------
** U. S. ENVIRONMENTRL PROTECTION RGENCV **
** REGION X **
** SURVEILLRNCE RND RNRLVSIS DIVISION **
I T I
LOCHT1ON - KLflHRTH FRLLS
STHTE = OR
CNTV CODE= 835
02
DIST OFF
FflC TVfE -
SIC CODE =
NOTES
11
MHJOR BRSIN = KLRMHTH
MINOR BHSIH
1ST LEVtL MILE= 248. 60
2Nt> LEVEL I1ILE= 004. 00
3RD LEVEL MILE=
PERMIT EXPIRES= 78/03/31
CHLORINE REblDURL TO BE MONITORED BV DRILV QRRBS.
K
THIS MUNICIPAL DISCHARGE IS LOCATED IN SEGMENT KB-05
RECIEVING WflTER- DITCH TO LOST R DIV CRN
LRT- 42-69-29 LONG- 121-44-44
TRT CODE= RS POP EQ= 1506
DRTE RRNQE
74/07/26 TO 7S/03/31
PRRRMETER DESCRIPTION
PH
BOD MQ/L
FECHL COL I FORM PER 1OOML
SUSPENDED SOLIDS MQ/L
FLOW MOD
BOD LBS/DRV
SUSPENDED SOLIDS LBS/DflV
MINIMUM RVERRGE
: 00
20. 0
200
20. e
0. 50e
84
34
MHXIMUM
9 00
167
167
EXC
TVHE FREO.
CiRRB
COMP
GRRB
COMP
REC
COMP
COI1H
3/HEEK
2/UhEK
I/WEEK
2/WEEK
DRILY
2/WbEK
2/UEEK
DRTR SOUKCE
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COIJD
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COHD
-------
BIOLOGICAL STATUS
River
----
Contact: Wendell Stout
Ore. Dent. Of Fish &
Wildlife
Loiselle/EPA ^,,.1/14/77
STREAM 1 STREAM
NAME
REACH
Willamson R| 93-0
src. to moutl
including 1
Klamath
Marsh
Jackson Cr.
src. to mout
Miller Cr.
src. to moutl
& Miller Lk.
Cottonwood ,
Scott, &
Sand Crks .
src. to moutl:
S. Fk. Sprague
source
to mouth
Fishhole Cr.
src. to mouth
^^B^^BJBOK
9BBBHB
SEG.
NO.
KB-03
KB-03
K3-03
K3-03
K5-04
KB-04
BBBM
BIOLOGICAL CRITERIA
destruction
of habitat
1
1
S
S
s
s
s
I
on
$
£
L
L
L
L
L
M
m
O k.
CO
||
.io
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
interruption.
of food chain
o
15
5
TJ
S
s
s
s
s
I
BBB
~
I
L
L
L
L
L
M
maam
interference w/
species well-being
o
2
3
TJ
S
Q
s
s
S
I
BS893
£
9
tf)
L
L
L
L
L
M
^M
BIOLOGICAL
PROBLEM
Intermittent flow with
high runoff, logging in
the headwater regions ,
reduced stream cover.
^^^^^^^^1
^^B
BIOLOGICAL
EFFECT
--M
Scouring streambed,
reduction cf habitat,
potholing, drying up in
the summer.
i
^1
STATUS
Ace
Ace.
Ace.
Ace.
Ace.
Ob:.
S seldom
I intermittent
C continuous
L
M
H
low
medium
high
ACC acceptable
OBJ objectionable
NA not acceptable
-------
BIOLOGICAL STATUS
river basin name Klamath River
Contact: Wendell Stout,
Ore. Dept. of Fish &
Wildlife
2/10
recorder,
Loiselle/EPA
.date
1/14/77
STREAM
NAME
EPBBHB^BB
Sprague R.
f m. S. Fk. &
Fishhole Cr.
conf, to
mouth.
N. Fk.
Sprague
src. to
mouth
Sycan R.src.
to mouth
Long Cr. src.
to mouth
Crater Lake
Sun Cr. &
Annie Cr.
src. to mout
Wood R.fm
Sun Cr. & An-
nie Cr. conf.
to mouth
STREAM
REACH
84-0
17-0
SEG.
NO.
KB- 5 4
KB-04
KB-04
KB-04
KB-02
KB-02
KB-02
BIOLOGICAL CRITERIA
destruction
of habitat
,
A
I
I
S
S
S
s
s
s
s
>.
0
M
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
O t.
IS
i"
Jo
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
n
interruption
of food chain
c
5
T>
I
S
s
s
s
s
s
s
MBHB
£
>
o
IB
M
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
rnrnrm
interference w/
species well-being
c
o
W
3
o
I
S
S
s
s
s
s
s
».
40
M
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
BIOLOGICAL
PROBLEM
A.g. related problems in
the upper reach. With-
drawals, return flows,
Increased nutrients. Low
summer flows .
(No real problems in the
BIOLOGICAL
EFFECT
Siltation, turbidity,
high temps., reduction
of desirable habitat.
lower reach.)
STATUS
i^
Obj.
.Ace.
Ace.
Ace.
Ace.
Ace.
Ace.
Ace.
S seldom
I intermittent
C continuous
L
M
H
low
medium
high
ACC acceptable
OBJ objectionable
NA not acceptable
-------
BIOLOGICAL STATUS
Klamath River
Contact: Wendell Stout,
Ore. Dept. of Fish &
,.,,, Loiselle/EPA d;... 1/14/77
STREAM
NAME
Sevenmile
Cr. s re. to
mouth
Cherry Cr.
src. to mout
Agency Lake
Klamath
Lake
Link R. src.
to mouth
Klamath R.
src. to Ore-
Calif, bord.
Spencer Cr.
src. to mouth
Howard
Prairie Res
iiiiiiiiiiuimj
STREAM
REACH
250-208
SEG.
NO.
KB-02
KB-02
KB-02
KB- 01
KB-01
KB-01
KB-01
KB-01
BIOLOGICAL CRITERIA
destruction
of habitat
1 duration
S
S
S
s
s
I
s
s
s
-
>
1
«9
L
L
L
L
L
M
L
L
L
1 importance 1
of factor 1
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
interruption.
of food chain
1 duration
S
S
s
s
s
I
s
s
s
HB
>.
a
>
a
10
L
L
L
L
L
M
L
L
L
gHBsa
interference w/
species well-being
duration
S
S
S
s
s
I
s
s
s
BBBBB
I severity
L
L
L
L
L
M
L
L
L
BBBBBB
BIOLOGICAL
PROBLEM
High nutrients, high
temp in summer.
Note: the above factors
the biological sta
amount of time.
Algae from Klamath Lake ,
log storage, turbidity,
slow flow.
(Lower
3/10
BIOLOGICAL
EFFECT
^^^^iBMHBiM^^^H
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^B
Algal blooms in the
summer.
do not adversely affect
us for a significant
High BOD, diurnal oxy-
gen depletion, enhance-
ment of scrap fish.
reach)
i^^^^B^^^MM
STATUS
m
Ace.
Ace.
Ace.
Ace.
Ace.
Obj.
Ace.
Ace.
Ace.
BHHI
S seldom
I intermittent
C continuous
L low
M medium
H high
ACC acceptable
OBJ objectionable
NA not acceptable
-------
BIOLOGICAL STATUS
Klamath River
Contact: Wendell Stout,
Ore. Dept. of Fish &
,«rH., Lo-selle/EPA d,t. 1/14/-77
STREAM
NAME
Jenny Cr.
src. to Ore.-
Calif. bord.
Hyatt Res.
Keene Cr,
src. to mout
Aspen Lake
Lake of the
Woods
Fourmile Lk
Thomas Cr.
src. to mout
Cottonwood
cr. src. to
mouth incl-
uding Res .
Quartz Cr.
src. to mout
include Res
STREAM
REACH
^KdBflBBV^RawJ
SEG.
NO.
KB-01
KB-01
KB-01
KB-01
KB-01
KB-01
KB-05
KB-05
KB-05
tamam^K
BIOLOGICAL CRITERIA
destruction
of habitat
1 duration 1
S
S
S
S
S
s
s
s
am
|
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
1 importance 1
of factor 1
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
BH
interruption.
of food chain
1 duration
S
S
S
s
s
s
s
s
BBBBS
1
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
interference w/
species well-being
duration
S
S
S
s
s
s
s
s
f
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
BIOLOGICAL
PROBLEM
(Maintained as a
(Insufficient
(Insufficient Data on
(Quartz Cr below Drews
4
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBI
BIOLOGICAL
EFFECT
warm water fishery)
Data)
lower reaches)
Res. insufficient data)
/10
BBBB
STATUS
BBBBi
Ace.
Ace.
Ace.
Ace.
Ace.
Ace.
Ace.
Ace.
S seldom
I intermittent
C continuous
L low
M medium
H high
ACC acceptable
OBJ objectionable
NA not acceptable
-------
BIOLOGICAL STATUS
Klamath River
Contact: Wendell Stout,
Ore. Dept. of Fish &
Loiselle/EPA 1/14/77
STREAM
NAME
BBBBBBiB
Dog Lake
Goose Lake
Gerber Res.
Miller Cr.
src. to mout
Lost R. fm
Ore,- Calif.
oorder to
OrerCalif.
border
BOBMHOBOMIK
STREAM
REACH
66-4
OHHI^I^B
SEG.
NO.
BIOLOGICAL CRITERIA
destruction
of habitat
I
1
KB-05
KB-05
KB-05
KB-05
HMBl^H
S
S
S
S
_
x
e
L
L
L
L
^
b
Io
No
No
No
No
interruption.
of food chain
c
o
To
5
S
S
S
S
HBHB
>.
I
L
L
L
L
interference w/
species well-being
§
5
o
S
S
S
S
|
L
L
L
L
BIOLOGICAL
PROBLEM
(Maintained as a warm
Note: not regarded as
resource sin_ce lake_is
no game fish.
Note: regarded as aj^anr
maintained as such. Tur
butTprbductfivity is good
_ ._ ...
BIOLOGICAL
EFFECT
..I
water fishery)
important to fisheries
naturally alkaline and
water fishery and
- m. * » =- CT -~ ~
bidity is quite high
*-, - «-,_ - - »«.- - -»
^^^i
^i
STATUS
Ace.
Ace.
Ace.
Ace.
S seldom
I intermittent
C continuous
L
M
H
low
medium
high
ACC acceptable
OBJ objectionable
NA not acceptable
-------
Contact: Wendell Stout,
Ore. Dept. of Fish & Wildlife
RECREATIONAL STATUS
River Basin Name Kiamath River
Recorder Loiselie/EPA
6/10
Date 1/14/77
Stream
Name
Willamson R.
src. to mouth
including
Klamath mars
Jackson Cr.
src. to mouth
Miller Cr.
src. to mouth
& Miller Lk.
Cottonwood C
Scott Cr., &
Sand Cr. srq
to mouth
S. Fk.
Sprague src.
to mouth
Fishhole Cr.
src. to mouth
R.M.
Range
93-0
i
Seg. #
KB-03
KB-03
KB-03
KB-03
KB-04
KB-04
Recreational Criteria
CO
C
r*
4^
fO
O
CO
I
S
S
S
S
S
en
c
r
.C
in
r-
u.
I
I
I
I
I
S
4J
1 (J CO
S- to -P
CU +-> i-
+-> c o
(0 O Q.
3 O 10
S
S
S
S
S
S
o>
c
P-
\/
r-
Z
I
I
I
I
I
I
O
'£
0)
jr
4J
(/)
0)
<
C
C
C
C
c
I
Problem - Cause
Recreation is limited because flow is severely reduced in the
summer due to logging practices.
Status
Ace.
Ace.
Ace.
Ace.
Ace.
Obj.
S = Seldom
I = Intermittent
C = Continuous
Ace = Acceptable
Obj = Objectionable
N.A.= Not Acceptable
-------
RECREATIONAL STATUS
River Basin Name Kiamath River
Recorder Loiseiie/EPA
Contact: Wendell Stout,
Ore. Dept. of Fish & Wildlife
7/10
Date 1/14/77
Stream
Name
Sprague R.
f m. S. Fk. &
Fishhole Cr.
conf. to mout
N. Fk. Sprague
src. to mouth
Sycan R. src.
to mouth
Long Cr, src.
to mouth
Crater Lake
Sun Cr. &
Annie Cr. src
to mouth
Wood R. fm.
Sun Cr. & An-
nie Cr. conf.
to mouth.
R.M.
Range
84-0
i
Seg. #
KB-04
KB-04
KB-04
KB-04
KB-02
KB-02
KB-02
Recreational Criteria
CD
C
-------
RECREATIONAL STATUS
River Basin Name Kiamath River
Recorder Loiselle/EPA
Contact: Wendell Stout,
Ore. Dept. of Fish & Wildlife
8/10
Date 1/14/77
Stream
Name
Sevenmile Ci;
src. to mouth
Agency Lake
Kiamath Lake
Link R. src.
to mouth
Kiamath R.
src. to Ore-
Calif, bord.
Spencer Cr.
src. to mouth
loward Prair
Res.
Jenny Cr. src
to OrerCalif.
>order
lyatt Res.
R.M.
Range
Le
Seg. #
KB-02
KB-02
KB-01
KB-01
KB-01
KB-01
KB-01
KB-01
KB-01
Recreational Criteria
01
c
r-
+J
rtJ
O
CO
I
I
I
S
C/I
S
I
S
I
CD
c
r~
.C
r~
u_
I
I
I
C
I
I
I
I
I
4J
I O l/>
i. tO -4->
J-
4-> C O
ro O Q.
3 O 1/1
S
I
I
S
S
S
I
S
I
O)
c
r-
_^i
r
Z
I
S
I
C
I
C
I
I
I
VI
u
u
cu
J=
-(->
(/I
cu
«<
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Problem - Cause
Algal blooms occasionally limit water contact sports (Aug-Sept
Status
Ace.
Ace.
ObiO
Ace.
Ace.
Ace.
A rr*
n^^.
Acc,
A f* f*
rlL. l_ *
S = Seldom
I = Intermittent
C = Continuous
Ace = Acceptable
Obj = Objectionable
N.A.= Not Acceptable
-------
Contact: Wendell Stout,
Ore. Dept. of Fish S, Wildlife
RECREATIONAL STATUS
River Basin Name Kiamath River
Recorder Loiseiie/EPA
9/10
Date 1/14/77
Stream
Name
Keene Cr.
src. to moutt
Aspen Lake
Lake of the
Woods
Fourmile Lk.
Thomas Cr.
src, to mouth
Cottonwood C
src. to mouth
incl. res.
Quartz Cr.
src. to moutt
incl. Res .
Dog Lake
Goose Lake
R.M.
Range
r.
Seg. #
KB-01
KB-01
KB-01
KB-01
KB-05
KB-05
KB-05
KB-05
KB-05
Recreational Criteria
O)
c
r-
4_>
ro
0
CQ
S
I
I
I
S
I
I
I
o>
c:
r
.C
l/>
r-
U,
I
I
C
C
I
I
I
S
4_>
1 U (/>
S- rO +J
C O
ra O Q-
2 C_) «^)
S
S
I
I
S
S
S
S
CD
c
^
^»
^
C
C
c
I
I
I
I
I
0
r*
O)
4J
V)
Ol
*£
C
C
c
c
c
c
c
c
Problem - Cause
(Insufficient data)
Status
Ace.
Ace.
Ace.
Ace.
Ace.
Ace.
Ace.
Ace.
S = Seldom
I = Intermittent
C = Continuous
Ace = Acceptable
Obj = Objectionable
N.A.= Not Acceptable
-------
RECREATIONAL STATUS
River Basin Name Klamath River
Recorder Loiselie/EPA
Contact: Wendell Stout,
Ore Dept. of Fish & Wildlife
10/10
Date 1/14/77
Stream
Name
Gerber Res.
Miller Cr.
src. to mouth
Lost R.
OreTCalif.
border to
OrerCalif.
border
R.M.
Range
66-4
Seg. #
KB-05
KB-05
KB-05
Recreational Criteria
U)
c
r"
4J
T5
O
CO
I
S
I
en
c
«r-
_C
to
r~
Ll_
C
I
C
4J
i o in
S- fO «->
O) 4-» S-
4-) C O
O)
.C
-M
------- |