EPA - Kawasaki Emission Measurement Comparison
Test Program
by
Thomas Cackette
Standards Development and Support Branch
Emission Control Technology Division
Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
Office of Air and Waste Management
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
-------
EPA - Kawasaki Emission Measurement Comparison Test Program
Abstract
. Three Kawasaki motorcycles were emission tested at Kawasaki Heavy
Industries in Japan, and at EPA. Emissions and fuel economy compared
well with the exception of CO emissions, which were significantly higher
at the EPA facility. It is believed ambient pressure differences between
facilities account for some of the difference in CO emissions.
-------
Introduction
A comparison emission test program between EPA and Kawasaki Heavy
Industries, Ltd using three Kawasaki motorcycles was requested by
Kawasaki in early 1975. The motorcycles were tested in Japan by Kawasaki,
and then shipped to EPA for comparison testing. The motorcycles, described
in more detail in Appendix I, are a 903 cc Z-l, a 247 cc F-ll, and a 174
cc F-7.
Program Objective
The objective of this test program was to assess the comparability
of the two test facilities. A complete correlation program, which would
include precise preconditioning, hot start tests, and -gas cylinder cross
checks, was not attempted.
Test Facilities
The test equipment and instrumentation used is presented in Table
I. Although the Kawasaki test report, reference 1, does not identify
the manufacturer of their dynamometer, the layout drawing indicates it
is very similar to the Shibaura being used by EPA. The power absorbers
are identical Clayton ECE-50 models.
Figure 1 presents the total absorbed power of the EPA dynamometer
for the two power settings used. The Kawasaki data presented in reference
1 is nearly identical, indicating the absorbed power characteristics for
testing were the same for both facilities.
Test Procedure
Kawasaki performed its tests per the "Draft Emission Regulation for
Motorcycles", dated January 17, 1974. The tests at EPA duplicated the
Kawasaki test procedure as reported in reference 1. A summary of the
test conditions is presented in Table II.
The dynamometer absorbed power used for this test program (and
specified in the Draft Regulations) is considerably lower than the
dynamometer absorbed power specified in the NPRM, reference 2. The
values in the NPRM are based on coast down tests performed by EPA, and
are the most recent data available. Thus the emission and fuel economy
values determined in this test program should be used only for facility
comparisons, and are not representative of the emissions and fuel
economy to be expected from testing these motorcycles per the NPRM. A
comparison of the dynamometer absorbed power specifications is presented
below.
-------
—2—
Dynamometer Absorbed Power at 65 kph
Total Absorbed Power, kw
Motorcycle Inertia Class, kg "Draft Regs" & as tested NPRM
Z-l 330 2.24 3.54
F-ll 210 1.75 2.83
F-7 200 1.72 2.70
A 1974 model F7, which was loaned to EPA by Kawasaki, was coast
down tested at the Transportation Research Center of Ohio. The results
of this test are presented in Figure 2 along with the dynamometer power
characteristics. As the figure shows, the road power determined from
coast down testing is much better represented on the dynamometer by the
NPRM specified power. The power setting, as specified in the Draft
Regulations and used for this test program, is much lower than the
motorcycle's actual road load power.
Test Results
For each motorcycle, the tests used for comparison consisted of the
2 cold-hot tests performed by Kawasaki and the three FTPs performed by
EPA. The test results are summarized in Table III. The individual test
sheets for the EPA tests are presented in Appendix II. A summary of the
Kawasaki data, taken from reference 1, is presented as Appendix III.
Table IV presents a statistical comparison of the test data. A t-
statistic and corresponding confidence level is presented. Large con-
fidence levels indicate the means between test facilities are significantly
different. The results for each of the three motorcycles and possible
causes for significant differences are discussed below.
Z-l; There is a significant difference between facilities for all
parameters for this motorcycle. It is believed that the differences may
be a result of a change in the motorcycle's operational performance.
Upon receiving the motorcycle from Kawasaki, the Z-l was driven over a
preparation LA-4 followed by 2 FTPs. The emission results from these
first two tests were radically different than the results reported by
Kawasaki in reference 1. HC was more than 3 times higher (15 g/km), CO
was 25 percent lower (27 g/km), and NOx was 3 times higher (0.6g/km)
than reported by Kawasaki. The results from the third test were similar
to the Kawasaki results, indicating a major shift in performance had
taken place. The fourth and fifth tests were consistent x
-------
—3—
F-ll: All parameters except CO compare well between facilities. At
a confidence level of 90 percent, the CO emissions between facilities
are different. As Table IV shows, the average CO emissions at the EPA
facility were 16 percent higher than at Kawasaki.
F-7; All parameters except CO and NOx compare well between facilities.
The comparison of NOx emissions must be considered in light of the one
significant figure reported for NOx in the Kawasaki report. The CO
emissions are different at the 99.8 percent confidence level. The
average CO emissions at the EPA facility were 30 percent higher' than at
Kawasaki.
In summary, the emissions and fuel economy compare well between
facilities except for CO, which is different between facilities at the
90 percent confidence level.
An apparent difference between test conditions at the two facilities
was the ambient pressure and temperature. On the average, the ambient
pressure was 28 mm of mercury (1 inch Hg) higher and 6 degrees centigrade
(10°F) lower at the Kawasaki facility. (The average ambient temperature
at Kawasaki was 17°C, which is outside of the required test range of 20-
30°C).
The effects of ambient conditions on motorcycle emissions have not
yet been quantified. It is likely, however, that the ambient effects on
motorcycle emissions will be similar to the ambient effects on light
duty vehicle emissions, that is the trends may be expected to be the
same. In an attempt to identify reasons for the differences in CO
emission levels between facilities, the ambient correction factors
determined in the 1975 EPA-U.S. MVMA correlation study (ref. 3) for
light duty vehicles were applied to the F-7 and F-ll test data. With
emissions corrected to the same ambient conditions, the confidence level
that the CO emissions between facilities are different was reduced from
90 to 30 percent for the F-ll and from 99.85 to 99.8 percent for the F-
7. The confidence level for HC emissions for the F-7 was increased from
less than 20 percent to 95 percent; other confidence levels showed
little change. These changes are due to ambient pressure only; correction
factors for other ambient parameters were negligible (Ref. 3).
If these correction factors are applicable to motorcycles, then
ambient pressure differences between facilities account for some of the
differences in CO emissions. The quantitative use of these LDV correction
factors for motorcycles is questionable, however the direction of the
effect would seem applicable, and results in a reduction of the difference
between facilities for CO emissions.
-------
-4-
Summary and Conclusions
1. The facilities compared well with the exception of CO emissions,
2. CO emissions were significantly different between facilities,
with EPA measuring higher CO emissions.
3. A large difference in test ambient pressure between facilities
most likely accounts for some of the difference in CO emissions between
facilities.
4. Because ambient correction factors for motorcycles-are not
available, the quantitative effect of the ambient pressure differences
between facilities was not determined. Development of these factors
for motorcycles is recommended.
5. The results of the Z-l tests were not used due to a probable
shift in engine performance which occurred during EPA testing.
6. It is recommended that additional correlation programs be
performed as test facilities and procedures are changed and as low
emission motorcycles become available.
-------
CtUVAA.C-TeSlSTi.es. - £P/\
s -•
f "
Z-l
20 VO 60 ?
SPetT) ~ kPH
IOD
Jpow&l.
IO RtTeiavjct I
s -•
F \ G U^E 2.
TRACC
F-7
•to
10!)
-------
Table I
Equipment and Instrumentation Comparison
Dynamometer
CVS
Analyzers
HC
CO
co2
NOx
EPA
Shibaura BS-30
Clayton ECE 50 Power
Absorber, Belt Driven
Inertia Wheels, 53Q..5
mm Roll Diameter
AMI Positive Displace-
ment Pump.
Beckman 400 FID; 0-100,
0-1000 ppm Hexane
Beckman 315 NDIR;
0-2500 ppm
Beckman 315 NDIR;
0-1%
TECO CL; 0-25, 0-100
ppm
Kawasaki
Manufacturer not specified,
Clayton ECE 50 Power Absorber,
.Belt Driven .Inertia Wheels,
53Q.5,mm,.Roll. Diameter.
Beckman Toshiba Convos -
3630 Positive Displacement
Pump
Beckman Toshiba FID; 0-4, 0-20,
0-40, 0-200, 0-400, 0-2000
ppm Hexane.
Beckman Toshiba NDIR, 0-200,
0-500 ppm*
Beckman Toshiba NDIR, 0-4", 0-8,
0-16%. .
Beckman Toshiba CL; 0-10, 0-25,
0-100, 0-250, 0-1000, 0-2500,
0-10000 ppm.
Kawasaki Data from Reference 1
*The test data sheets and calibration curves indicate 0-2000 and 0-8000
ppm ranges were used.
-------
Table II
Test Conditions
Z-l F-ll F-7
Inertia, kg 330 210 200
Absorbed Power @ 65 kph, kw 2.24 (3.0 hp) 1.75 (2.3 hp) 1.72 (2.3 hp)
Shift Points Ref. 1 Ref. 1 Ref. 1
Choke Operation Ref. 1 Ref. 1 Ref. 1
Rear Tire Pressure, kPa 214(31 psig) 214(31 psig) 193(28 psig)
„«.,,, Indolene 30
Test Fuel
Engine Oil As Received . . Kawasaki 2 Stroke . .
-------
Table III
Test Results
Z-l
Kawasaki
EPA
F-ll
Kawasaki
EPA
F-7
Kawasaki
EPA
X
S
S%
X
S
s%
X
S
S%
X
S
s%
X
S
S%
X
S .
s%
HC
4.36
.007
.16
3.04
.15
4.9
7.99
.424
5.3
8.52
-.60
7.0
4.31
.240
5.6
4.30
.11
2.6
CO
37'. 28
.028
.08
33.82
.86
2.5
19.54
.665
3.4
23.37
1.98
8.5
7.02
.290
4.1
10.04
.26
2.6
co2
91.28
4.42
4.8
83.19
4.51
5.4
45.50
5.54
12.2
41.69
2.51
6.0
42.61
6.66
15.6
42.14
1.45
3.4
NOx
.19
.014
7.4
.22
.006
2.7
.02
0
0
.019
.002
10.5
.02
0
0
.027
.002
7.4
Fuel
Economy
14.3
.38
2.7
16.1
.64
4.0
23.2
1.80
7.8
22.3
1.61
7.2
35.1
4.10
11.7
32.8
.91
2.8
Note: Emissions in g/km
Fuel Economy in km/1
S% = s/x * 100
-------
Table IV
Comparison of Test Results
HC CO CO NOx Fuel Economy
Zl
Fll
F7
^V V ^ /V
\*V» » ATT* ^ i -TV A / / Tm A
Zl
Fll
F7
t statistic
Zl
Fll
F7
Confidence Level
Zl
Fll
F7
1.32
-.53
.01
43.4
-6.2
0.2
11.65
-1.07
.07
99.8
60
<20
3.46
-3.83
-3.02
10.2
-16.4
-30.1
5.37
-2.53
-12.22
98
90+
99.85
8.09
3. 81
0.47
9.7
9.1
1.1
1..9.8
1.10
.13-
85
60
<20
" -.03
.001
-.007
-13.6
5.3
-25.9
-3...10
,56
-5.16-
94
40
98.5
-1.8
6.9
2.3
-11 .'2
4.0
7.0
-3.38
.56
1.01
95
40
60
-------
References
st
1. 1— Engineering Dept. of Kawasaki Heavy Industries, CO, Ltd.,
"Test Data of Exhaust Emissions from Motorcycles, Kawasaki
Zl, Fll, F7" June 2, 1975.
2. Federal Register, Vol. 40, No. 205, October 22, 1975, pages
49496-49530.
3. Leiferman, M.W. and Wilson, G.M., "1975 EPA-U.S. MVMA Correlation
Study", EPA, June, 1975.
-------
Appendix I
Test Vehicle Description
Make
Model Year
Model
Type
Engine Type
# of Cylinders
Displacement
Horsepower
Compression Ratio
Ignition
Transmission
Inertia (incl. rider)
Kawasaki
1975
Z-l
Street
4s dohc
4
903 cc
82
8.5:1
Bat. & Coil
5 Speed
330 kg
Kawasaki
1975
F-ll
Enduro
2s
1
247 cc
22
6.4:1
Magneto
5 Speed
210 kg
Kawasaki
1975
F-7
Enduro
2s reed valve
1
174 cc
18
7:1
GDI
5 Speed
200 kg
-------
1976 MSPCP CONSTANT-VOLUME SAMPLER RESULTS MOTORCYCLE
1 •&
o
Q
'l ©
o
TEST » 18- 9fl3
PROCESSED: li:22:U NOV 3t 1975
MFG. "On. OISPL. INERTIA cut
CODE MODEL VEHICLE I.D. Yk CC MASS-KG MAS!
335 E7 175 ENDURO KAWASAKI 75 75 175.0 0 12(
AXLE N/V MANUFACTURE SPECS. ;
RATIO RATIO RORE STROKE C.R. TIMING PPM * CO GEAR f
0.0 0.0 61.500 5B.AOO 7.10 0.0 0. 0.0
REQUESTOR
INIT. BRANCH
TC
FUEL
DATE INJ. SHUT.
7- 1-75 0 0
EXHAUST
liCAPR BP^LS CARH MODEL TYPES
1 00000
*<5 NO. ACT. OYNO
;-KG CYL. H.P. HP 0 65 KPH
) 1 IS 2.3
r H 1 F / » — .. — — MfiMliFAfTllOF n rt T A - •- •
SC)|7?6RG3 = 21 OHS26 . -
N'S: FAMILY :
cvs HOURS : 17??.9
INI). HAPO / TEMP..OF / MANOMFTER / CVS PRES. / INITIALS /
H.P. "HG DRY >iFT CVS S°EC.GP. UNITS IN OUT OPEW. DRIVER
1.7 ?9.?0 7?.5 58.0 100.0 1.75 IN 22.02 20.92 . JSH KTC
DILUTION AIP 0.0 0.0
OYNO. CVS
NO. UNIT
MC 11C
CU«IC FT
PER PEV.
0.2763B
CALCULATED
1443.
NOn
FACTOR
IGN
TIMING
on
RPM
0.
3 CO
0.0
GEAP
IDLE
RPM
0.
EVAP. LOSS
. GRAMS .
TIRE
PRES.
0.0
BAR 1
5.B64 KM
. COUNTS
EXHAUST SAMPLE
.3 CU. FT.
9ACKGPOUNO SAMPLE
n/FACTOR=34.735
CORRECTED
HC-FIO
CO
CO?
NOX CHEM
RANGE
7
Pi
1
2
METER
25.3
37.?
26.3
ft. 2
CONC. RANGE
7P3.67
7R7.05
0.??9
1.55
7
3
1
2
"ETFR
1.1
0.?
4.3.
0.1
CONC.
37.46
4.07
0.141
0.03
MASS EMISSIONS
CONCENTRATIONS GMS GMS/KM
747.?9 PPM 33.98 5.79
7K3.11 PP" 71.B9 12.26
0.1«H * 272.00 46.39
1.5.1 PPM 0.21 0.04
KM/L
27.9
BAG 2
6.273 KM
20741. COUNTS 4761.7 CU. FT. 1375.6'SECONDS D/FACTOP=67.230 ACT RPM= 1433.7 RPM RATIO(C/A)=0.9938
HC-FIO
CO
C02
NOX CHEM
840 3 5.B53
EXHAUST SAMPLE
RANGE MFTER CO\IC. P
7 9.? ?99.4ft
8
1
2
KM
13.5
]ft .4
?.o
1?.345.
276.01
0.142
0.50
COUNTS
BACKGROUND
ANGE "FT"
7 0.4
fl .
1
2
?^34.
0.3
4.0
0.2
2 CU.
EXHAUST SAMPLE BACKGROUND
HC-FIO
CO
CO?
NOX CHEM
RANGE
7
ft
1
2
WEIGHTED VALUES (1)
GRA"S/KM
BEFORE POUNDING
MFTER
?0.6
41 .1
?3.0
5.6
HC .
4.42
4.4247
COMC. RANGE MET?-*
644. S5
S76.63
0.200
1.40
CO
9.9
9.H917
7
H
1.
?
0.?
0.0
4.5
0.2
CO?
4.?.y
42
.7191
SAMPLE
1 CONC.
6.10
O.n35
O.ns
FT. 516
S'-MOLE
' CONC .
6.H5
O.i)
1.1 .19
0.05
NOX
0.02
0.0?452
. CORRECTED
CONCtr'NTCATIONS
270. on PPM
0.1 OH *
0.45 PPM
MASS
GMS
22.24
4?. 39
265.89
0.10
.3 SECONDS D/EACTOP=3B
CO^oEC (EO
CONCENTRATIONS
A'jy.M? PPM
H76.63 PPM
0.162 *
1.35 PP«
N'ASS
Gf'S
29.52
81.91
237.50
0.19
EMISSIONS
GMS/KM
' 3.55
6.76
42.39
0.02
.110 ACT PPM
EMISSIONS
GMS/KM
5.04
14.00
40.58
0.03
KM/L
36.5
= 1434.6 RPM RATIO(C/A)
KM/L
?9.8
75 WEIGHTEDl
KM/L
32.
32.4197
-
=0.9945
FUEL-WEIGhTl
KM/L
0.0
€-•
^
•O ..
§-
•a.
H.
x C
M
M_
f"-
-------
! O
i
i Q
1 O
TEST « 16-1029
197ft MSPCP CONST ANT-VOLU>"^rAMPLFH RESULTS MOTORCYCLE
PROCESSED: io»i3»4o OCT 10. 1975
MFG.
cone
335
AXLE
RATIO
0.0
MODEL
F7 175 ENOURO
N/V
RATIO BORE
0.0 61.500
REQUESTOR
IMT. BRANCH
T C ECT
DATE
7-11-75
WOO. OJSPL. INERTIA CU
VFHlCLf I.D. YR CC MASS-KC. MAS
KAWASAKI 75 . 75 175.0 I) 12
MANUFACTUOE SPECS.
STROKE C.R. TIMING RPM « CO GEAR
56.800 7.10 0.0 0. 0.0
FUEL
INJ. SHUT.
0 0
cCARB HRRLS CARP MODEL
1
EXHAUST
TYPES
00000
»a MO.
S-KO CYL.
0 1
RPM HC
0. 4.30
SYSTEM
NAME
ACT,
H.P. HP «
18 2,
XNUFACTURE
CO
7.00
EVAP EGN
SYS. TYPE
4 1
. DYNO
f-5 KPH
.3
NOX
0.02
CRANK
CASE
0
A
C UTl
0 0
EVAP
0.0
FUEL
TYPE
1
TEST TEST
. TRANS S.PAT. YEAR TYPE
40 76 5
' TIRES DRIVE. SOURCE
SIZE RIM CYCLE CODE
5 1
FUEL
TANK MAINT DOOM
90 0
GVW
0
REQUESTOR COMMENTS
LABORATORY COMMENTS
TEST DATE ODOMETER
7-11-75 0.
KAWASAKI 75 F7
175 CL PAG 1-2121046 PAG 2-2296778 BAG83 3-2129645
ENGINE FAMILY J
CVS HOURS : 1742.8
IND. HAPO / TEMP.,OF / MANOMETER / CVS PRES. /—INITIALS /
H.P. "HG DRY WET CVS SPEC.GR. UNITS IN OUT . OPER. DRIVER
1.7 28.79 72.0 Sfl.O 101.0 1.75 IN 22.20 20.40 OFF KTC
DILUTION AIR 0.0 0.0 .
DYNO. CVS
NO. UNIT
MC 11C
CUBIC FT
PER REV.
0.27621
CALCULATED
RPM
1443.
NOX
FACTOR
0.8996
IGN
TIMING
00
PPM
0.
* CO
0.0
GEAR
IDLE
RPM
0.
EVAP. LOSS
GRAMS
TIRE
PRES.
0.0
BAG 1
5.889 KM
12171. COUNTS 2741.B CU. FT.
EXHAUST SAMPLE
BACKGROUND SAMPLE
CORRECTED
D/FACTOfi=34.166
MASS EMISSIONS
HC-FID
CO
C02
NOX CHEM
. RANGE
7
7
1
3
METER
25.0
85.7
26.4
4.0
• CONC.
750.01
843.40
0.233
2.00
RANGE
7
7
1
3
METER
0.3
0.0
4.2
0.1
CONC.
9.00
0.0
0.037
0.05
CONCENTRATIONS GMS
741.27 PPM 33.19
• 843.40 PPM 76.24
0.197 9- 280.60
1.45 PPM 0.26
5.64
12.95
47.65
0.04
KM/L
27.3
BAG 2
6.377 KM
20768. COUNTS 4678.5 CU. FT. 1376.0 SECONDS D/FACTOR=68.670 ACT RPM= 1435.5 RPM RATIO=0.9947
/////////MEASURED '.USTANCE DIFFERS FROM STANDARD DISTANCE BY 2.7 PERCENT/////////
EXHAUST SAMPLE
HC-FIO
CO
C02
NOX CHEM
RANGE
4
6
1
3
METER
88.3
56.6
16.1
1.1
CONC. (
267.44
273.68
0.141
0.55
*ANi
4
6
1
3
BACKGROUND SAMPLE
METER CONC.
2.6 8.78
0.0 0.0
3.6 0.031
0.1 0.05
CORRECTED
CONCENTRATIONS
25H.79 PPM
273.68 PPM
0.110 %
0.50 PPM
MASS EMISSIONS
GMS GMS/KM
19.77 3.10
42.21 6.62
267.22 41.90
0.11 0.0?
KM/L
37.7
BAG 3
5.912 KM
.12269. COUNTS 2763.9 CU. FT.
/////////MEASURED OISTANCE DIFFERS FROM STANDARD OISTANCF
513.1 SECONDS 0/FACTOR=.35.500 ACT RPM= 1434.7 RPM RATIO
-------
'I £, TEST » in.-lllO
: MFG.
:i <•-, CODE MODEL
i "' 315 F7 17S ENOURO
N/V
PATIO RATIO RORF
0.0 0.0 61.500
1976 MSPCP CONSTANT-VOLUME SAMPLER RESULTS MOTORCYCLE
PROCESSED! ll:22«15 NOV 3. 1975
MOO. OISPL. INFRTIA CURB NO. ACT. DYNO A
VEHICLE I.fJ. YR fC MASS-KG M4SS-KG CYL. H.P; HP * 65 KPH C UT
KAWASAKI 75 75 175.0 0 120 1 18 2.3 0 0
ROKE C.R. TIMING PPM « CO GEAR RPM HC CO NOX FVAP
.aoo 7.10 o.o o. o.o n. 4.30 7;oo 0.02 o.o
TEST TEST
L TRANS S.PAT. YEAR TYPE
4 0 76 5
/ TIRES DRIVE SOURCE
SIZE RIM CYCLE CODE
5 1
: c
.1 o
PFOUESTOR FUEL
INIT. RRANCH DATE INJ. SHUT. «CARH WHRLS CARH MOOFL
T C ECT 7-10-75 0 0 1
EXHAUST SYSTEM
TYPES N»ME
ooooo
EVAP EGN CRANK FUEL FUEL
SYS. TYPE CASE TYPE TANK • MAINT ODOM cvw
41 0 1 90 00
PEOUESTOR COMMENTS
Y COMMENTS
TFST OATF OOOMETF.R
7-18-75 . 0.
KAWASAKI 75 F7
RAG 1-2053721 RAG ?-??4*399 BAG-3-2097115 2 STALLS-BAR 1
ENGINE FAMILY » .
CVS HOURS : 1750.0
INO. BARO / TEMP..OF /- MANOMETER / CVSPRES. / INITIALS / OYNO. CVS
H.P. "Hr, DRY UKT CVS SPEC.GR. UNITS IN OUT OPER. DRIVER NO. UNIT
1.7 . 29.IP 71.5 59.0 100.0 1.75 IN 22.10 20.75 OFF BOB MC 11C
DILUTION AIR 0.0 0.0 •
O
O
< O
CUBIC FT
PF" REV.
0.27635
PAG 1 5.702
CALCULATED
RPM
1443.
KM 12131.
NOX
FACTOR
0.9)64
COUNTS
EXHAUST SAMPLF
HC-FID
CO
C02
N'OX CHEM
B«fi 2 6.237
RANGE
7
' 8 '
1
Z
KM
METE*
24.6
39.3
25.1
6.H
20645.
CONC.
762.98
835.05
0.21H
1.70
•COUNTS
IGN
TIMING
00
2775.3 Cll.
BACKGROUND
t^AMGE
7
8
1
?.
4723.
METER
0.2 .
0.2
4.7
0.1
0 CU.
EXHAUST SAMPLE RACKGOOnhO
HC-FID
CO
C02
NOX CHFM
BAG 3 5.822
RANGE
7
8 •
1
2
KM
METER
8.1
12.7
16.0
' 1.9
!?.?«! .
CONC.
265.05
259.49
0.138
0.47
COUNTS
EXHAUST SAMPLE
HC-FIO
CO
C02
NOX CHEM •
PANGE
7
8
1
2
WFIGHTfO VALUES(l)
GOAMS/KM
REFOPE ROUNDING
*'F TER
19.9
40.8
23.4
• 5.6
• HC
4.2?
4.2174
CONC.
623.75
869.67
0.203
. 1.40
CO
9.9
WANGr
7
8
1
?
?ROO.
METER
0.3
0.0
4.6
0.?
6 CU.
RPM it CO GEAR
0. 0.0
FT.
SAMPLE
CONC.
6.85
4.07
0.041
0.03
FT. 1374
SAMPLF
CONC.
11. ?7
'o.o
0.040
0.05
FT. 515
BACKGROUND SAMPLE
PANGF
7
P
1
?
fclETER
0.1
0.?
5.1
fl.P
CO?
40.5
9.8946 40
.4897
CONC.
3.43
4.07
0.044
0.05 .
' NOX
0.03
O.OP553
CORRECTED
IDLE EVAP. LOSS . TIRE
WPM . GRAMS PRES.
0. . 0.0
0/FACTOR=35.463 • ' •
MASS
CONCENTRATIONS GMS
756.3? PPM
831.10 PPM
0.179 v,
1.6« PPM
.3' StrONOS
CORRECTED
34.28
76.05
256.96
0.23
0/FACTO"=70
MASS
CONCf.NTPATIONS GMS
2S4.9? PP'«
259.41 ppit
0.099 %
0.43 PPM
.1 SECONDS
COyiVtCTED
CONrEUTtf AT IO
620.41 PPM
86S.71 PPM
0.160 *
1.35 PPM
19.66
" 40.41
! 24?. 67
0.10
()/FACTOR = 3B
M4SS
NS G"S
28.46
80.19
233.24
0.19
EMISSIONS
GMS/KM
6.01
13.34
45.07
0.04
.252 ACT RPM=
EMISSIONS
GMS/KM
3.15
6.48
38.91
0.02
.028 ACT RPM=
EMISSIONS
GMS/KM
4.89
13.77
40.06
0.03
KM/L
27.5
1431.0 PPM
KM/L
39.7
1430.5 RPM
KM/L
30.4
75 WEIGHTEDl
KM/L
34.
33.7664
RATIO
-------
TEST # 18- 981
MSPCP CONSTANT-VOLUME
RESULTS MOTORCYCLE
PROCESSED: 11«22«15 MOV 3. 1975
Q
O
o
i ©
1
jo
o
0
I O
HFG.
CODE MODEL
335 Fll 250 ENDURO
AXLE N/V
RATIO RATJfi tfORE
0.0 0.0 68.000
RFOUESTnp
INIT. HPANCH 'DATE
TC 0- 0- 0
PFQ'.IESTnp COMMENTS
[.ARORATORY COMMENTS
TEST DATE ODOMETER
7- 2-75' 0.
i MOD. DISPL. INERTIA CU
VEHICLE I.D. YR CC MASS-KG MAS
KAWASAKI 75 75 250.0 ?10 13
MANUFACTURE SPECS.
STROKE C.w. TIMING RPM % CO GEAR
68.000 -6.40 0.0 0. 0.0
FUEL
INJ. SHUT
0 0
. «CARR
1
ORRLS CARR MODEL
: HP AT 65KPH SPEC SHIFT PTS. CHOKE
: 1ST ALL HA<~,2 DIST=B«1=2103M7 WG?.=
INO.
H.P.
1.7
BIRO
"HG
29.20
/ TEMP
OPV
74.5
EXHAUST
TYPES'
00000
50 SEC.
PR NO
S-KG CYL
0 1
RPM HC
p. 8,
SYSTEM
NAME
KAWASAKI
ACT. OYNO
. H.P; HP (B 65 KPH
2? 2.3
co ,>;ox
00 19.50 0.0?
EVAP EGN CPANK
SYS. TYPE CASE
4 1 0
75 Fll
RG3 1STALL
C UTL
0 0
0.0
FUEL
TYPE
1
e.'jGi
CVS
TEST TEST
. TRANS S.PAT. YEAR TYPE
4 0 . 76 5
' TIRES DRIVE SOURCE
SIZE R!M C'CLF CODE
5 ' 1
FUEL
TANK MAINT OOOM
90 0
NE FAMILY :
HOURS ! 161
..OF / MANOMETER — / cvs PRES. / — INITIALS — /
WET CVS SPEC.GR. UNITS IN OUT OP£R. DRIVER
59.5 100.0 1.75 IN 21.99 20.93 JSH KTC
1.4
OYNO.
NO.
MC
GVW
0
CVS
UNIT
11C
CUBIC FT
PER REV.
0.27*39
1 5.840
CALCULATED
RPM
1443.
KM 12?23.
f!OX
FiCTOP
0.90<«7
COUNTS
, • EXHAUST SAMPLE
RAG
HC-F10
CO
CO?
NOX CHEM
2 6.304
RANGE
7
8
1
2
KM
METER
4Q. 2
88. 0
?.<-.0
3.6
20H42.
cone.
1499.38
2139.75
0.??6
0.90
COUNTS
ION
TIM IMG
00
280*. 7 CU.
HACKGROUMD
RANGE
7
A
1
2
4785.8
METER
1.)
0.0
4.M
0.?
CU.
. ' EXHAUST SAMPLE BACKGROUND
RAG
HC-FID
CO
CO?
MOX CHEM
3 5.870
RANGE
7
a
i
2
KM
METER
17.4
28.6
15.9
2.3
12362.
CONC.
549.21
595.75
0.137
O.'SP
' COUNTS
EXHAUST SAMPLE
HC-FID
CO
CO?
rox CHFM
RANGE
7
a
i
2
WEIGHTED VALUES!!)
GRAMS/KM
RFFOPE ROUNDING
METER
43.9
86.1
24.1
' 3.7
" HC
8.69
8.6872
CONC.
1338.10
20*1 . 12
O.?09
0.92
CO
23.9
RANGE
7
8
1
*
•283P.6
METER
0.3
o.o
4.?
0.2
CU.
RACKGPOUNO
RAMGF
7
8
1
2
"ETER
0.8
0.0
4.1
0.2
C02
4?
23.8601 42.
.4
4488
IDLE EVAP. LOSS TIRE
RPM' .% CO GEAR RPM .- GRAMS PRES.
0.0.0 0. . 0.0
FT. . D/FACTOR=22.714 ' •
SAMPLE
CONC.
37.46
o.n
0.041
0.05
CORRECTED
CONCENTRATIONS
)4fr3.S7 PPM
2139. 7S PR"
0.186 *
0.8S PPM
MASS
GMS
67.08
198.01
271.23
0.12
FT. 1383.2 SECONDS D/FACTOR=S3
SAMPLE
CONC.
10.27
' 0.0
0.036
o.os
FT. 517
S»MP(.E
CONC.
27.30
0.0
1.035
0.05
NOX
0.02
0.02000
CORRECTED
CONCENTRATIONS
539.13 PPM
595.75 PPM
0.102 *
0.5T PPM
MASS
GMS '
42.13
94.00
252.59
0.12
EMISSIONS
GMS/KM
11.49
33.91
46.44
. 0.02
.192 ACT RPM=
EMISSIONS
GMS/KM
' 6.68
14.91
40.07
0.02
.2 SECONDS 0/FACTOP=24.314 ACT RPM=
COUPECTEO
CONCENTRATIONS
13)1.92 PPM
2081.1? PPM
0.175 *
0.88 PPM
MASS
GMS
60.81
194.77
257. H9
0.12
EMISSIONS
GMS/KM
10.36
33.18
.43.93
0.02
KM/L
17.2
1434.3 RPM RATIO(C/A)=0.9943
KM/L
27.7
1434.1 RPM RATIO(C/A)=0.9941
KM/L
IS. 2
75 WEIGHTED! FUEL-Wl
KM/L KM/I
22. . 0.
21.8047
c ;
-------
TEST * 18-1030
1976 MSPCP CONSTANT-V
SAMPLER RESULTS MOTORCYCLE
PROCESSED: ion3:4o OCT 10, 1975
MFG.
CODE
335
A XL£
PATIO
0.0
MODEL
Fll 250
KJ / \1
N/V
RATIO
OiO
ENDURO
BORE
68.000
MOD. DISPL.
VEHICLE I.D. YR CC
KAWASAKI 75. 75 2^0.0
MAMijf^^TilDP C D F f* Q
'"Ai>jllrMv*IU"t. D r L I* j •
STROKF. C.R. TIMING RPM
68.000 6.40 0.0 ' 0.
INFRTIA
CUPH
MASS-KC. MASS-KG
210
% CO GEAR
0.0
130
TfH P" /
RPM
0.
NO.
CYL.
1
— — MA
HC
8.00
ACT. DYNO
H.P. HP
22
Nil 1C" A f*Tl 1
INUr AO 1 U
CO
19.50
A
TEST TEST
« 65 KPH C UTL TRANS S.PAT. YEAR TYPE
2.3
NOX
0.02
0 0
EVAP
0.0
4 0
/ T T DP ^
f 11 Kt 3
SIZE , RIM
76 5
r\fttwc CAllQfF
UK i VC. 3UUKLC
CYCLE COOE
5 1
REQUESTOR FUEL
INIT. BRANCH DATE INJ. SHUT. ftCARB KRBLS CARB MODEL
TC 0-0-00 01
EXHAUST SYSTEM
TYPES NAME
00000
EVAP EGN CRANK FUEL FUEL
SYS. TYPE CASE TYPE TANK MAINT ODOM
410 190 0
CVW
0
REQUESTOR COMMENTS
LABORATORY COMMENTS
TEST DATE ODOMETER
7- 3-75 0.
BG1 =21 0097fiBG2=22605148G3=21 08833
KAWASAKI 75 Fll
ENGINE FAMILY I
CVS HOURS ! 1724.5
IND. BARO / TEMP..OF /- MANOMETER / CVSPRES.——/—INITIALS f DYNO. CVS
H.P. "HG DRY WET CVS SPEC.GR. UNITS IN OUT OPEH. DRIVER NO. UNIT
1.7 28.98 75.5 61.0 101.0 1.75 IN 21.68 20.55 JSH KTC MC HC
DILUTION AIR 0.0 0.0 ' •
BAG
BAG
CUBIC FT
PER »EV.
0.27662
1 5.832
HC-FIO
CO
C02
NOX CHEM
2 6. 275
CALCULATED NOX
RPM FACTOR
1444. 0.9?73
KM 12311. COUNTS
EXHAUST SAMPLE
RANGE METER CONC.
7 51.5 1569. ft4
8
1
2
KM
91.4
24.6
3.7
20601.
2246.??
0.214
0.92
COUNTS
EXHAUST SAMPLE
BAG
HC-FID
CO
C02
NOX CHEM
3 5.853
RANGE
7
8
1
2
KM
METER .
19.0
31.8
17.0
2.4
12083.
CONC.
59*. 97
66ft. 00
0.147
0.60
COUNTS
EXHAUST SAMPLE
HC-FIO
CO
COS
NOX CHEM
RANGE
7
8
1
2
WEIGHTED VALUES!!)
GRAMS/KM
BEFORE ROUNDING
METER
45.1
86.4
24.3
3.9
HC
9.02
9.0238
CONC.
1374.47
2152.17
O.P11
0.97
CO
25.1
IGN
TIMING
00
2804.9 CU.
BACKGROUND
RANGE METER
7 0.9
8 0.0
1 4.3
2 0.2
4693.7 CU.
BACKGROUND
RANGE METER
7 0.7
8 0.0
1 4.1
2 0.3
2753.0 CU.
BACKGROUND
RANGE METER
7 0.2
8 0.0
1 3.9
2 0.2
C02
43.7
25.0629 43.7295
IDLE EVAP. LOSS TIRE
RPM % CO GEAP . RPM GRAMS PRES
0. 0.0 0. . O.p
FT. D/FACTOR=22.512
SAMPLE CORRECTED MASS EMISSIONS
CONC. CONCENTRATIONS GMS GMS/KM
30.69 1540.51 PPM 70.56 12.10
0.0
0.037
0.05
FT. 1381
SAMPLE
CONC.
23.90
0.0
0.035
0.07 .
FT. 506
SAMPLE
CONC.
6.85
0.0
0.034
0.05
NOX
0.02
0.02065
2246.2? PPM
0.178 %
O.HP. PP"
.1 SECONDS
COWECTED
207.73
259.03
0.12
0/FACTOR=49
MASS
CONCENTRATIONS GMS
573.55 PPM
66ft. Oft PPM
0.112 %
0.53 PPM
.6 SECONDS
CORRECTED
43.96
103.06
273.20
0.12
35.62
44.41
0.02
.034 ACT RPM
EMISSIONS
GMS/KM
7.01
16.42
43.54
0.02
D/FACTO»=23.774 ACT PPM
MASS
CONCENTRATIONS GMS
1367.91 PPM
2152.17 PPM
0.179 *
0.93 PPM
61.50
195.34
255.04
0.13
,
EMISSIONS
GMS/KM
10.51
33.37
43.57
0.02
•
KM/L
16.9
= 1429.8 RPM
• KM/L
25.6
= 143J.1 RPM
KM/L
18.1
75 WEIGHTEDl
KM/L
Z\.
20.9776
RATIO(C/A)=0.9904
RATIO(C/A>=0.9913
FUEL-WI
KM/I
O.I
o j
O ;
o !
O [
o j.
0
o j
i
o f
o f
O ;
-------
TEST 1 18-1072
MFG.
CODE MODEL
335 Fll 250 ENDURO
1976 MSPCP CONSTANT-vl
RESULTS MOTORCYCLE
PROCESSED: 10:13:40 OCT
VEHICLE 1.0.
KAWASAKI 75
YP
-75
CC
250.0
AXLE
RATIO
0.0
N/V
RATIO
0.0
BORE
68.000
MANUFACTURE SPECS.
STROKE C.R. TIMING PPM
60.000 6.40 0.0 0.
REQUESTOR
INIT. BRANCH
TC
FUEL
DATE .INJ. SHUT.
0-0-00 0
8RRLS CARP MODEL
IMFPT
% CO
0.0
0 0
IS CUP.H NO
KG MASS -KG CYL
131 1
T (-11 c J _
GEAR RP^i
0.
EXHAUST SYSTEM
TYPES NAME
000
HC
8.
. H.P
22
00 19
EVA
SYS
ACT
. HP i«l
2
ACTURE
CO
.50
P EGN
. TYPE
= OYUO
*S KPH
.3
NOX
0.02
CRANK
CASE
A
C
0
UTL
0
EVAP
0.0
FUEL
TYPE
1
TRANS
4
TIRES
SIZE
FUEL
TANK
9
TEST TEST
S.PAT. YEAR TYPE
0 76 5
DRIVE SOURCE
RIM CYCLE CODE
5 1
MAINT ODOM GVW
000
REQUESTOR COMMENTS
LABORATORY COMMENTS
TEST DATE ODOMETER
7- 8-75 0.
HP AT 65f.PH SPEC SHIFT PTS. CHOKE 50 SEC. KAWASAKI 75 Fll
250 CC -TIRE PRESS 31 PSJ-BG*1-211890ftBG"?-2270817RG»3-2111585
ENGINE FAMILY :
CVS HOURS : 1736.8
INC". BARO / TEMP.,OF / MANOMETER / CVS PKES. / INITIALS / DYNO. CVS
H.P. "HG DRY WET CVS SPEC.GR. UNITS IN OUT OPER. DRIVER NO. UNIT
1.7 28.75 74.0 60.5 100.0 1,75 IN 21.73 20.48 LRH JAS MC 11C
DILUTION AIR 0.0 0.0
BAG
CUBIC FT
PER REV.
0.27644
1 5.883
CALCULATED
KM
RPM
1444.
12211.
NOX
FACTOR
O.Q308
COUNTS
EXHAUST SAMPLE
RANGE METER
BAG
HC-FID
CO
C02
NOX CHEM
2 6.304
7
8
1
2
KM
48.6
85.6
24.1
3.4
20751 .
COMC.
1481.05
2065.79
0.209
0.85
COUNTS
EXHAUST SAMPLE
RANGE METER
BAG
HC-FID
CO
C02
NOX CHEM
3 5.H62
7
8
1
2
KM
15.7
25.9
14. B
1.8
12152.
CONC.
49S.21
537. R5
0.128
0.45
COUNTS
EXHAUST SAMPLE
RANGE METER
HC-FID
CO
C02
NOX CHEM
7
8
1
2
WEIGHTED VALUES!!)
GRAMS/KM
BEFORE ROUNDING
38.4
78.0
22.0
3.6
HC
7.66
7.8577
COMC.
1172.48
1S38.37
0.191
0.90
• CO
21.2
IGN
TIMING
00
2760.2 CU.
BACKGROUND
RANGE METER
7 0.5
a 0.3
1 4.4
2 0.2
46Q0.6 CU.
BACKGROUND
RANGE METER
7 0.2
8 0.1
1 3.6
2 0.2
2746.8 CU.
BACKGROUND
RANGE METER
7 0.4
8 0.2
1 3.6
2 0.3
C02
38.9
21.1968 38.8804
IDLE
RP" * CO GEAR RPM
0. 0.0
FT.
SAMPLE
CONC.
17.10
6.10 •
0.038
0.05
FT. 1379
SAMPLE
CONC.
6.85
2.03
0.031
0.05
FT. 508
SAMPLE
CONC.
13.69
4.07
0.031
0.07
NOX
0.02
0.01709
0
EVAP
. LOSS TIRE
GRAMS PRES.
•
D/FACTOR=23
CORRECTED
CONCENTRATIONS
1464.67 PPM
2059.95 PPM
0.173 *
0.80 PPM
MASS
GMS
66.02
187.46
247.26
0.11
.3 SECONDS D/FACTOR=57
CORRECTED
CONCENTRATIONS
491.48 PPM
535.25 PPM
0.097 *
0.40 PPM
MASS
GMS
37.65
82.78
236.59
0.09
.8 SECONDS 0/FACTO°=27
CORRECTED
CONCENTRATIONS
1159.2^ PPM
1834.46 PPM
0.161 %
0.83 PPM
MASS
f,MS
52.00
166.13
228.89
0.11
31^0
.763
EMISSIONS
GMS/KM
11.22
31 .87
42.03
0.02
.904 ACT RPM=
EMISSIONS
• GMS/KM
5.97
13.13
37.53
- 0.02
.248 ACT RPM=
EMISSIONS
GMS/KM
8.87
28.34
39.05
0.02
• • KM/L
18.4
1433.9 RPM RATIO(C/A)=0.9932
KM/L
30.4
1433.0 RPM RATIO(C/A)=0.9926
KM/L
21.0
75 WEIGHTEDl FUEL-W
KM/L KM/I
24. 0.
24.1363
r
0 i
O
O
o
o •
I
i
0 ;
0
G s
-------
TF.ST » 18-1189
197* M?PCP CONSTANT-VOI U
UMPLF.P RESULTS MOTORCYCLE
PROCESSED: 10:13:39 OCT 10. 197
o
Q
MFG.
CODE MODEL
335 Zl 900
AXLE N/V
RATIO RATIO BORE
0.0 0.0 66.000
REOUESTOR
INIT. BRANCH DATE
TC ECT 7-15-75
REOUESTOR
LABORATORY
TEST DATE
7-15-75
COMMENTS
COMMENTS
ODOMETER
0.
"00. DISPL. INERTIA CU
VEHICLE I.D. YP CC MASS-KC, MAS
KAWASAKI 75 75 900.0 330 25
MANUFACTURE SPECS.
STROKE C.P. TIMING PPM % CO GEAR
66.000 R.50 0.0 0. 0.0
FUEL
INJ. SHUT.
0 0
"CARS
u
EXHAUST
«SI?LS CARB MODEL TYPES
00000
: HP AT 65 KPH SPECIAL SHIFT PTS
: OIST-BAG1=21C4384 BAG2=2262251 BAG3=2107682
IND.
H.P.
2.4
BARO
"HG
29.30
RB NO.
S-KG CYL.
0 4
T ni f / -v M i
RPM HC
0. 0.0
SYSTEM
NAME
H.P. H
82
iNUFACT
CO
0.0
ACT. OYNO
P id 65 KPH
3.0
NOX
0.0
EVAP EGN CRANK
SYS. TYPE CASE
4 1 0
KAWASAKI 75 Zl
TWO STALLS-BAGS
/ TEMP. .OF / MANOMETER / CVS
DRY WFT CVS SPEC.GR. UNITS IN
73.5 58.1 101.0 1.75 IN 22.05
A
C UTL TRANS S.PAT
004 0
EVAP SIZF. RIM C
0.0
FUEL FUEL
TYPE TANK MAINT
1 16 0
ENGINE FAMILY :
CVS HOURS : 1744
PRES. / INITIALS 1
OUT OPER. DRIVER
20.75 OFT JSH
TEST TEST
. YEAR TYPE
76 5
RIVE SOURCE
YCLE CODE
5 1
ODOM
0
.5
DYNO.
NO.
MC
GVW
0
CVS
UNIT
11C
BAG
BAG
.CUBIC FT
PER REV.
0.27653
1 5.842
HC-FID
CO
C02
NOX CHEM
2 6.281
CALCULATED NOX
RPM FACTOR
1443. 0.8369
KM 12115. COUNTS
EXHAUST SAMPLE
RANGE METER CONC.
7 18.1 570.13
8
1
2
KM
65.9
44.8
59.7
20746.
1497.80
0.399
14.92
COUNTS
EXHAUST SAMPLE
RANGE METER
BAG
HC-FID
CO
C02
NOX CHEM
3 5.852
4
8
1
2
KM
82.9
63.0
28.3
12.2
12056.
CO.N'C.
251 .21
1555.03
0. ?47
3.05
COUNTS
EXHAUST SAMPLf:
RANGE METER
HC-FID
CO
C02
NOX CHEM
4
8
1
2
WEIGHTED VALUESCD
GRAMS/KM
BEFORE ROUNDING
P9.6
79.5
37.1
52.6
HC
3.0
2.9854
COMC.
270.32
1882.43
0.326
13.15
CO
32.9
IGN
TIMING
00
2788.0 CU.
BACKGROUND
RANGE METER
7 0.5
8 0.4
1 5.7
2 0.7
4774.3 CU.
BACKGROUND
RANGE METER
4 3.1
8 0.7
1 5.2
2 0.7
2774.5 CU.
BACKGROUND
RANGE METER
4 3.6 '
8 0.8
1 6.3
2 0.7
C02
78.0
32.8332 77.9928
IDLE EVAP. LOSS TIRE
PPM 91 CO GEAR . RPM GRAMS PtfES.
0. 0.0 0. . 0.0
FT. 0/FACTO«=22.136
SAMPLE • CORRECTED MASS EMISSIONS
CONC. CONCENTRATIONS GMS GMS/KM
17.10 553.81 PPM 25.21 4.32
8.13
0.049
0.17
FT. 1373
SAMPLE
CONC.
11.53
14.23
0.045
0.17
FT. 505
SAMPLE
CONC.
13.35
16.26
0.054
0.17
NOX
0.21
0.20585
1490.04 PPM
0.352 %
14.76 PPM
136.97
508.17
1.98
.6 SECONDS D/FACTOR=31.
CORRECTED
CONCENTRATIONS
240.05 PPM
1541.25 PPM
0.203 %
2.88 PPM
MASS
GMS
18.72
242.61
502.59
0.66
.1 SECONDS 0/rACTOP=24.
CORRECTED
CONCENTRATIONS
257.51 PPM
1866.83 PPM
0.274 %
12. 9B PPM
MASS
GMS
11 .67
170.77
394.43
1.73
23.45
86.99
0.34
370 ACT RPM=
EMISSIONS
GMS/KM
2.98
38.63
80.02
0.11
737 ACT RPM=
EMISSIONS
GMS/KM
1.99
29.18
67.40
0.30 •
i
KM/L
17.0
1435.4 RPM
KM/L
15.6
1432.1 RPM
KM/L
,
19.6
75 WEIGHTEDl
KM/L
17.
16.8464
RAT10(C/A)=0.9949
RATIO(C/A)=0.9926
FUEL-WI
KM/I
O.I
O I-
°
o
0
-------
TEST * 18-1237
MFG.
CODE MODEL
335 71 900
1976 MSPCP CONSTANT-vl
IE SAMPLER PESULTS MOTORCYCLE
PROCESSED: 10=13:39 OCT in.
VEHICLE I. P.
KAWASAKI 75
MOO.
YR
75
DISPL.
rr.
900.0
AXLE
RATIO
0.0
N/V
RATIO
O'.O
80PE
66.000
MANUFACTURE SPECS.
.STROKE C.R. TIMING RPM
66.000 8.50 0.0 0.
INERTia CURB NO. ACT. DYNO A
MASS-KG MASS-KG CYL. H.P. HP lot 65 KPH C
330 250 4 82 3.0 0
UTL TRANS S«PAT.
040
TEST TEST
YEAR TYPE
76 5
IDLE/ MANUFACTURE DATA-
% CO GEAR RPM HC CO NOX
0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0
/ TIRES DRIVE SOURCE
EVAP SIZE RIM CYCLE CODE
0.0 51
REOUESTOR
INIT. BRANCH
T C ECT
OATF '
7-18-75
FUEL
INJ. SHUT.
0 0
eCARB »BBLS CARB MODEL
FXHAUST SYSTEM
TYPES . NAME
00000
EVAP EGN CRANK FUEL FUEL
SYS. TYPE CASE TYPE TANK MAlNT ODOM GVW
410 1 16 0 0 0
REQUESTOR COMMENTS
LABORATORY COMMENTS
TEST DATE ODOMETER .
9- 9-75 0.
HP AT 65KPH SPECIAL SHIFT PTS.
BAG1-2.104.A98 BAGZ-2.256627 RAG3-2,108,737
KAWASAKI 75 Zl
ENGINE FAMILY :
CVS HOURS : 1762.1
IND. BARO / TEMP.,OF / MANOMETER / CVS PRES. / INITIALS /
H.P. "HG DRY KET CVS SPEC.GR. UNITS IN OUT OPER. DRIVER
2.4 29.51 70.5 59.2 100.0 1.75 IN 22..46 20.98 CFJ DCS
DILUTION AIR 0.0 0.0
DYNO. CVS
NO. UNIT
MC 11C
CUBIC FT CALCULATED NOX IGN
PER REV. RPM FACTOR TIMING RPM
0.27631 1442. 0.9224 00 0.
% CO
0.0
GEAR.
IDLE
RPM
0.
EVAP. LOSS
GRAMS
TIRE
PRES.
0.0
BAG 1
5.343 KM
12131. COUNTS 2811.1 CU. FT.
0/FACTOR=21 .280
HC-FIO
CO
C02
NOx CHEM
EXHAUST SS*PLF
RANGE
7
8
1
2
MKTEP
18
63
47
62
.1
.9
.9
.6
CO
570
1444
C
1 c;
RACKGROU
NC. RANGE
.13
.01
.428
.65
7
8
1
2
NO SAMPLE
METf.R
0
0
4
1
.4
.2
.3
.4
CONC.
13
4
0
0
.69
.07-
,0'37
.35
CORRECTED
CONCENTRATIONS
557.
1440.
0.
15.
09 PPM
14 PPM
393 %
32 PPM
MASS EMISSIONS
GMS GMS/KM
25.57 4.38
133.47 22.84
572.61 98.00
2.15 0.37
KM/L
15.9
BAG
2 6.265
HC-FIO
CO
C02
c:ox CI-.FM
KM 207-=
EXHAUST S"'
RANGE MF.TEP
4 90.4
6 69. S
1 28.3
2 12.0
COUNTS 4800.9 CU. FT.
1375.6 SECONDS 0/FACTCR=30.612 ACT RPM= 1432.8 RPM RAT 10(C/A)=0.9938
.•'Lc
BACKGROUND SAMPLE
RANGE
4
8
1
2
CORRECTED
MASS EMISSIONS
METF.R
3.7
0.1
4.2
CONC.
10.4?
6.in
0,10
CONCENTRATIONS GMS GMS/KM
260.75 FPM 20.44 3.26
1590.4!} PPM 251.75 40.18
0.2!& % 537.40 85.78
2.90 PPM 0.70 0.11
KM/L
14.7
BAG 3
5.P.54 KM
i ?>.:
HC-FIO
CO
C02.
NOX CHEM
EXHAUST :•
RANGE METE.-
4 97.2
3 ftl .7
1 33.7
2 52.3
2812.7 O.!. FT.
RACK'GROUNO SAMPLE
50ft.3 SF.CONOS 0/FACTOP = 23.708 ACT RPM= 1431.4 RPM RAT 10 (C/A) =0.9928
CORRECTED
MASS EMISSIONS
. 16
13.08
RANGE
4
8
1
2
METER
3.5
0.2
3.6
0.4
WEIGHTED VALUES(l) HC
GRAMS/KM 3.2
BEFORE ROUNDING 3.2064
CO
34.0
34.0003
C02
86.1
86.0565
CONC.
4.07
0.031
0.10
NOX
0.22
0.21964
CONCENTRATIONS GMS GMS/KM
282.73 PPM 12.99 2.22
1943.90 PPM 180.27 30.79
0.311 % 454.14 77.58
12.98 PPM 1.82 0.31
KM/L
.17.6
75 WEIGHTEDl
KM/L
16.
15.6621
o ;
i
O
o
;
o
o •
O •
O -
f
c ;
;,.
O .
i
O |
O ;-
C i
I
c '.
FUEL-WEIGHTl
KM/L
0*0
-------
TEST « 18-3334
MFG.
CODE MODEL
335 Zl 900
MSPCP CONSTANT-VOLI
ISAMPLKP RESULTS MOTORCYCLE
PROCESSED: 10:13:40 OCT lot i<
VEHICLF l.o.
KAWASAKI 75
MOD.
YR
75
OI?PL.
rc
900.0
INERTIA
MASS-KG
330
MASS-KG
250
t-'O.
CYL.
H.P.
82
ACT. DYNO A
HP IS 65 KPH C
3.0 0
UTL TRANS S.PAT.
0 4 0
TEST TEST
YEAR TYPE
76 S
AXLE
PATIO
0.0
N/V
RATIO
0;0
BORE
66.000
REQUESTOR
INIT. BRANCH
TC ECT
DATE
9-11-75
MANUFACTURE SPECS.
STROKE C.R. TIMING RPM
66.000 fl.50 0.0 0.
FUEL
INJ. S^UT. CCARR 0P.BLS CARR MODEL
0 0 *
IDLE/ MANUFACTURE OATA-
% CO GEAR *PM HC CO NOX
0.0 0. 4.40 37.30 0.19
/ TIRES DRIVE SOURCE
EVAP SIZE RIM CYCLE CODE
0.0 51
EXHAUST SYSTEM
TYPES NAME
00000
EVAP EGN CRANK FUEL FUEL
SYS. TYPE CASE TYPE TANK MAlNT ODOM CVW
410 1 16 0 0 0
REQUESTOR COMMENTS
LABORATORY COMMENTS
HP AT 65 KPH SPECIAL SHIFT POINTS
81=3130118 82=3378418 83=3133857
KAWASAKI 75 Zl
ENGINE FAMILY :
CVS HOURS : 1775.7
TEST DATE
9-10-75
ODOMETER
50.
IND. BARO / TEMP.,OF / MANOMETER / CVS PRES. / INITIALS /
H.P. "HG DRY WET CVS SPEC.GR. UNITS IN OUT OPER. DRIVER
2.4 28.88 70.5 61.5 100.0 1.75 IN 32.11 20.58 DCS CFJ
DILUTION AIR 0.0 0.0 ' ' • '
OYNO. CVS
NO. UNIT
MC 11C
CUBIC FT CALCULATED NO/ IGN
PER REV. PPM FACTOR TIMING RPM
0.37635 1443. 0.9739 00 0.
* CO
0.0
GEAR
IDLE
RPM
0.
EVAP. LOSS
GRAMS
TIRE
PRES.
30.0
BAG 1
5.914 KM
12137. COU'lTS 3747.8 CU. FT.
D/FACTOR=21.014
/////////MEASURED DISTANCE DIFFERS FROM STANDARD DISTANCE BY 3.3 PERCENT/////////
EXHAUST SAMPLE
HC-FID
CO
C03
NOX CHEM
RANGE
4
8 .
1
2
METER
96.4
63.9
51.6
64.3
CO'JC. (
389.60
1444.01
0.464
16.07
>ANi
4
8
1
3
BACKGROUND SAMPLE
METER CONC.
3.5 9.85
0.1 3.03
5.4 0.047
1.1 0.38
CORRECTED
CONCENTRATIONS
380.23 PPM
1443.0« PPU
0.4?0 %
15.81 PP"
MASS EMISSIONS
GMS GMS/KM
13.57 2.13
130.65 32.09
598.20 101.15
3.39 0.39
KM/L
16.4
BAG 2
6.326 KM
30764. COU'JTS 4704.8 CU. FT. 1375.4 SECONDS D/FACTOR = 28.755 ACT RPK= 1434.8 RPM RATIO (C/A) =0.9944
EXHAUST SAMPLE
HC-FID
CO
C02
NOX CHEM
RANGE
4
8
1
3
METER
102.5
73.4
30.3
12.5
CONC . f
309.53
1705.79
0.364
3.13
>AN<
4
8
1
3
BACKGROUND SAMPLE
METER CONC.
3.7 10.43
0.5 10.17
5.1 0.044
0.6 0.15
CORRECTED
CONCENTRATIONS
399.47 PPM
1695.98 PPM
0.3P2 *
2.98 PPM
MASS EMISSIONS
GMS CMS/KM KM/L
23.01 3.64
363.03 41.59
541.40 85.58 14.4
0.74 0.12
BAG 3
5.896 KM
13132. COUNTS 3743.9 CU. FT.
507.3 SECONDS D/FACTOR = 33.047 ACT RPM= 1434.9 RPM RAT 10(C/A)=0.9944
/////////MEASURED DISTANCE DIFFERS FROM STANDARD DISTANCE BY 3.0 PERCENT/////////
EXHAUST SAMPLE BACKGROUND SAMPLE
RANGE METER CONC. RANGE METER CONC.
HC-FID 4
CO 8
C03 1
' NOX CHEM 2
WEIGHTED VALUESID
GRAMS/KM
BEFORE ROUNDING
99.0
83.8
39.7
49.5
HC
3.9
2.9349
297.98
3011 .00
0.351
13.38
CO
34.6
34.5765
4
8
1
3
3.9
0.3
5.6
1.1
C03
85.5
85.5073
10.99
6.10
0.048
0.33
NOX
0.23
0.32288
CORRECTED
CONCENTRATIONS
267
2005
0
12
.47 PPM
.16 PPM
.304 %
.11 PPM
MASS EMISSIONS
GMS GMS/KM
13.
181.
433.
1.
90
73
63
76
2.19
30.83.
73.55
0.30
KM/L
18.3
75 WEIGHTEOl
KM/L
16.
15.7186
©
O
O
O
O
O
O i.
O L
FUEL-WEIGHTl
KM/L
0.0
-------
; \
TABLE 1 .' SUMMARIZED EMISSION RESULTS '
MODEL
Z1
• '
P11
.4
P7
TEST NO.
18-1
18-2
22-4 '
2373
22-1
22-2
22-3
22-6
• 23-2
18-5 '
18-4
18-3
23-1
.23-4
GARB.
#1
#2
#2*
#2*.
#1 '
#2
#3*
#3*
#3*
#1 *
#2
#3 .
#1 *
#1 *
DRIVING SCHEDULE
LA-4 HOT
LA-4 HOT
LA-4'. COLD HOT
LA-4 COLD HOT
LA-4 HOT
*LA-4 HOT
LA-4 HOT
•
LA-4 COLD HOT
LA-4 COLD HOT
LA-4 HOT
LA-4 HOT
LA-4 HOT .
LA-4 COLD HOT .
LA-4 COLD HOT
MASS EMISSIONS CMS/KM •
. HC CO .CO. NO
>
fD 3
Ml d. '
H-
M'
M
M
------- |