EPA-AA-SDSB-88-06
Technical Report
Heavy-Duty Engine Testing Report -
Correlation Testing of CMC 5.7L/MVMA Engine
By
Lee Jones
June, 1988
NOTICE
Technical Reports do not necessarily represent final EPA
decisions or positions. They are intended to present
technical analysis of issues using data which are
currently available. The purpose in the release of such
reports is to facilitate the exchange of technical
information and to inform the public of technical
developments which may form the basis for a final EPA
decision, position or regulatory action.
Standards Development and Support Branch
Emission Control Technology Division
Office of Mobile Sources
Office of Air and Radiation
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
-------
-2-
I. Background
The correlation between the heavy-duty test facilities of
a manufacturer and EPA's test facilities is of significant
interest to both the manufacturer and EPA. It is especially
important from a regulatory standpoint because of Selective
Enforcement Audit (SEA) testing requirements. Thus, EPA/MVEL
conducted testing on a Chevrolet heavy duty gasoline fueled
engine with the intent of providing correlation data for
comparison with similar data developed by laboratories which
conduct SEA emissions tests for the manufacturers of heavy duty
gasoline (HDG) engines. This round robin program was a joint
effort on the part of EPA/MVEL and the Motor Vehicle
Manufacturers Association (MVMA).
II. Engine, Fuels, Test Procedure and Test Plan
The engine that was used in this program was supplied by
General Motors Corporation (GMC) specifically for this
correlation testing. Actually, GMC supplied two engines for
this program, the first being replaced after having developed
mechanical problems. None of the emissions results from the
first engine are included in this report.
The engine was a 175 horsepower, 8 cylinder, "V"
configuration, HD gasoline engine which displaces 350 cubic
inches (5.7L) and has a rated speed of 3750 RPM.
The test plan for this engine (a copy of which is in the
Appendix, attachment II) called for a series of cold start and
hot start transient emission tests interspersed with a 12 hour
(minimum) natural soak. A minimum of 4 cold start and 8 hot
start emission tests were completed at each facility. All
transient testing was to be in strict compliance with Federal
Register testing procedures.
Steady state emission tests and throttle/ dynamometer
response tests were also performed at each facility. The
results of the additional testing could be used as a diagnostic
tool if a major emissions offset were to be identified between
facilities. The test fuel which was used by each participant
in this program met all Federal Register specifications. Also,
General Motors suggested that the regression line tolerance for
torque y-intercept be held to 5 ft Ibs or less. This
additional requirement was accepted by all participants in
hopes that it would result in less data scatter and improved
correlation.
Ill. Round Robin Design
The correlation engine was tested consecutively in cells
2, 3, 1 and 9 at Southwest Research Institute (SWRI), Ford
-------
-3-
Motor Company in Dearborn (FORD), EPA-MVEL in Ann Arbor (EPA),
General Motors Proving Ground in Milford (GMPG), and Chrysler
Motors in Highland Park (CHRYS). SWRI is a contractor facility
located in San Antonio, Texas which performs SEA testing for
FORD and CHRYS.
IV. Composite Emission (Cold/Hot Combination) Results and
Comparison
EPA mean composite emissions for this engine were HC of
1.05, CO of 30.88, and NOx of 6.53, all in g/BHP-hr. All
participants' engine emission and performance results are
present in tabular form on pages 1 thru 33 of the appendix
attachments. An analysis of how the participating lab's
composite emission data compare to that developed by EPA is
presented in bar graph form in the attached pages 34 through
39. Emissions in g/BHP-hr are first presented in absolute
values and then shown as a percent difference relative to EPA
numbers. The comparison of hot start and cold start emission
results are presented as percent differences in the tables on
pages 40 and 41, respectively. The following narrative can be
used in conjunction with the data.
Composite HC emissions for SWRI cells tt2 and tt3 were very
close to EPA results. However, an inadvertant engine condition
of increasing coolant temperature probably caused the observed
progressively lower HC emissions from SWRI cells ttl & #9 and
then at FORD. It is surmised that as the operating temperature
of the engine progressively increased, the higher combustion
temperatures cause more HC to be burned resulting in the trend
of HC lower emissions. The over-temperature condition was
subsequently identified as a progressively failing engine water
pump. It was corrected at EPA, and the HC emissions appear to
have returned to norminal ranges after that repair.
CO emissions compared to the EPA data showed variation
from +8.7 percent (at FORD) to -8.8 percent (at CHRYS), which
were all within acceptable limits. Composite NOx emissions
were generally lower relative to EPA's value. This was
unexpected since the engine was operated at a higher
temperatures at SWRI and FORD, which could have led to higher
NOx values. The generally lower NOx values from non-EPA
laboratories is not fully understood, but the values do fall
within a reasonable range. NOx emissions, compared to those
measured at EPA, varied from, +10 percent at GMPG to -8.7
percent at SWRI cell tt3. BSFC, in Ib/BHP-hr, were higher by
4.1 percent in cell #1 at SwRl and lower by 2.9 percent in
cell #9 at SwRI, and all other BSFC results fell within this
range. Overall, the percent differences were low and
correlation was good.
-------
-4-
V. Hot Start Emission Comparison
The hot start emissions data correlations between EPA and
the other participant facilities were very similar to the
composite emissions data. HC ranged from +8.1 percent at SWRI
cell #3 to -20.9 percent at FORD, with the same progressive
decrease in values as the composite emissions data showed. CO
was 9.7 percent higher at FORD and ranged down to 7.6 percent
lower than EPA at SWRI cell tt9. NOx values were generally
lower than EPA by as much as 7.8 percent at SWRI cell tt3. GMPG
and Chrysler showed a higher NOx values than EPA (as with
composite data). GMPG measured highest with a NOx value 10.5
percent higher than EPAs. BSFC for hot starts also showed SWRI
cell ttl measuring 4.3 percent higher and cell #9 1.6 percent
lower, but again, agreement here was generally good.
VI. Cold Start Emission Comparisons
Cold start emissions showed more variation, which is
frequently the case. HC emissions data from all of the non-EPA
participants were lower than EPA's data, ranging from -12.8
percent at SWRI cell 82 to -27.5 percent at SWRI cell 89.
These differences were not investigated and are not
understood. CO correlation was generally good, with a high
value of +12.1 percent at FORD and one low result of -15.9
percent at Chrysler. As with hot start and composite
emissions, only GMPG and Chrysler had NOx values higher than
those of EPA. The range of values were +10.2 percent at GMPG
to -9.0 percent at SWRI cell 83. BSFC showed slightly more
variation, but well within reasonable limits. SWRI cell 89 had
a difference of -4.0 percent compared to EPA data, and SWRI
cell 81 had the highest increase at 4.5 percent.
VII. Summary
In summary, EPA tested a GM-350 heavy-duty gasoline
engine in a round robin program to establish correlation
between EPA and manufacturers' emission test facilities.
Conclusions are:
1. The composite emission results from EPA were, in
g/BHP-hr: 1.05 HC, 30.88 CO, and 6.53 NOx. BSFC
was .614 Ib/BHP-hr.
2. Correlation between EPA and manufacturers'
facilities was acceptable for CO, NOx, and BSFC,
with differences generally less than 10 percent.
General Motors Proving Grounds in Milford had data
slightly outside of this range for NOx, and Ford
Motor Company in Dearborn had a cold start NOx value
12.1 percent higher than EPA's. Chrysler Motors in
-------
-5-
Highland Park had a CO cold start value which was
-15.9 percent relative to EPA, but their hot start
and composite emission were in much better agreement.
In general, the HC correlation was poor, but some of
the data should be disregarded because of the engine
over-temperature condition. It is believed that as
the engine temperature rose, more HC was burned,
thus leading to the progressively lower HC level
measured at Southwest Research Institute and Ford
Motor Company in Dearborn. The engine condition was
then corrected at EPA before EPA's testing,
resulting in a return to nominal HC levels, both at
EPA and General Motors Proving Gounds. The cold
start HC emission results generated at Chrysler
Motor Company showed a -25.2 percent offset but
there was good agreement on both hot start and
composite emission results.
-------
-6-
Appendix
Attachment I
Emission Results
Emission Comparisons
Pages 1-33
Pages 34-41
Attachment II
TEST Plan
-------
Table 1
NVMA HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE ENGINE COMEIATION PROGKAN DMA SHEET
COMPOSITE EMISSIONS DATA*
Round 2
FACILITY TEST HUM DATE SATO.
NO. NO. MO/DT/Vft IN. NG.
SMftl 1 1 10/09/06 29.31
(Cell «2) 2 2 10/10/06 29.30
3 3 10/14/86 29.34
4 4 10/15/86 29.40
MEAN 29.36
STDEV 0.00
CVX 0.20
SMDI 1 1 10/29/06 29.40
(011*3) 2 2 10/30/06 29.49
3 3 10/31/06 29.41
4 4 11/3/86 29.35
S 1 1K »
CV*
0.22
SMMI 1 1 11/21/86 29.43
(Cell fl) 2 2 11/22/06 29.10
3 3 11/25/06 29.09
4 4 11/26/06 29.39
5-CooMnn. 5 12/01/06 29.10
MEAN
S1DEV
CVX
CMftl 1 1 1,
(C«ll*9) 2 2 1
3 3 1i
4 41
5 5 1;
MIAN
SIDEV
CVX
29.24
0.10
0.62
ym 8:8
/ 10/80 29.35
/ 19/86 29.46
/22/06 29.2?
0.09
0.29
SPEC. NUN.
gra/lb
72.31
69.31
74.40
59.10
60.70
6.70
9.06
04.19
B'tf
03.64
00.53
4.92
6.11
37.63
70.33
43.10
43.30..
£8
11
ft?
is:*?
NC CO NO*
9M/bhp-hr pVbhp-hr gn/brip-
1.07
1.12
0.97
0.90
1.04
0.07
6.99
1.14
1.05
1.05
1.04
1.07
0.05
4.38
0.91
1.01
0.86
0.92
0.98
0.94
0.06
6.67
1:00
0.92
0.00
0.00
0.09
9.94
32.98
31.47
31.35
31.00
31.72
0.86
2.70
31.39
31.62
29.80
30.94
30.94
0.81
2.62
27.71
30.59
30.12
28.22
28.32
28.99
1.41
4.06
%•$
31.26
26.04
27.47
28.50
1.96
6.07
6.55
6.27
6.01
6.01
6.21
0.26
4.15
5.88
5.87
6.10
6.00
5.96
0.11
1.83
6.38
6.20
6.22
6.45
6.17
6.30
0.10
1.63
6'.02
6.52
5.99
6.00
0.30
4.06
C02 ISFC
hr gM/bhp-hr tb/bhp-hr
855
022
831
833
835
14.01
870
876
850
857
865.25
9.?$
1.07
858
869
875
071
9
1.05
014
SSI
Oi66
0.633
0.600
0.614
0.615
0.610
0.01
1.75
0.642
0.646
0.632
0.632
0.630
0.007
'..1?
0.629
0.640
0.643
0.644
0.640
0.639
0.007
1.00
1
0.60
0.01
0.00
CVX • 100X x (STDEV/ MEAN)
• Data weighted 1/7th cold cycle and 6/7th hot cycle (first hot tett only)
c«
10/02/07
Tape 1
-------
Table la
NMU HEAVY OUT1 GASOLINE ENGINE CORRELATION PROGRAM DATA SHEET
COMPOSITE EMISSIONS DATA*
Rowirf 2
FACILITT
row -DM
EPA
CMPG
(Nil ford)
CVX - 100X
CHRVSLEK
HIGH. ftUK
TEST
NO.
1
4
MEAN
STDEV
CVX
3653/3654
3656/3657
3660/3661
MEAN
STOEV
CVX
1
3
4
MEAN
StDEV
CVX
* (STDEV/
1
2
3
5
MEAN
STDEV
CVX
RUN
NO.
54/55
86/87
8/15
9/17
10/19
lift]
3
6
9
15
MEAN)
DATE
MO/DT/TR
05/06/87
05/07/87
05/08/87
05/14/87
7/22/87
7/23/87
7/24/87
08/18/87
08/20/87
12/17/87
12/17/87
12/17/87
12/18/87 •
12/19/87
•AM.
IN. NC.
29.50
Oi20
29.10
29.10
29.10
8:8
29.08
28! 85
28.97
28.81
0.15
0.52
29.59
29.60
29.65
29.H
29.15
29.55
0.10
0.32
SPEC. NUN.
om/tb
29.70
8:8
66.68
47*.50
53.11
50.40
52.07
tt:U
51.19
1:8
53^09
54.19
60.43
10.30
17.04
37.2
38.1
V.1
18.3
11.2
5.0
12.19
NC
flM/bhp-hr
0.837
0!861
0.85
0.01
1.16
0.97
0.99
1.02
1.05
0]95
f 0.92
0.96
0.03
3.29
0.971
1.000
1.029
0.999
0.922
0.985
0.010
1.08
CO
32.562
32.571
32; 542
36.608
33.57
2.02
6.03
30.49
31.02
30.26
31.04
31.61
30.88
30.88
32.80
29.19
28.10
30.24
2.05
6.79
27.S69
27.518
27. 127 .
29.276
29.259
28.156
1.030
3.66
NO*
QVbtip-hr
6.19
6.31
6.26
5.89
6.16
0.19
3. OS
6.48
6.49
6.49
6.53
0.10
1.46
7.49
6.94
7.13
7.17
7.18
0.23
3.18
6.75
6.97
7.12
7.O2
6.96
6.96
0.11
1.91
C02
•a/btip-hr
847
847
857
817
T
834
827
824
832
1
847
848
841
836
843
6
826.3
826.0
830.1
827.1
821.8
826.7
3.1
0.38
•SFC
Ib/bhp-hr
0.626
8:&7
0.610
oloio
1.625
0.615
0.610
0.607
0.621
0.616
0.614
0.005
0.888
S:8
0.619
0.614
0.621
0.006
0.95
10/02/87
0.6101
0.6088
0.6113
0.6115
0.6076
0.6O99
0.0017
0.28
1/29/88
Page 2
-------
Table 2
NVNA HEAVY DOIT GASOLINE ENGINE COME I AT I ON PROGRAM OA1A SHEET
COLO STMT EMISSIONS DATA
•(Mid 2
FACILITY
S«l
(Celt f2)
Iwtl
Sum
(Ctll fl)
(C.?l*»9)
TEST
NO.
1
i
4
MEAN
STDEV
CVX
3
4
MEAN
SIOEV
CVX
1
2
I
MEAN
SIDEV
CVX
\
5
MEAN
SIOEV
CVX
RUN
NO.
1
2
4
1
§
4
1
3
4
5
DATE IMO.
NO/DV/VR IN. NC.
10/09/86 29.31
10/10/86 <
10/14/86
10/15/86
10/i
1M
10/3
•9/86
0/86
1/86
11/03/87
11/21/86
11/22/86
11/25/86 <
11/2
12/0
t/8 !
29)34
29.48
29 36
0 08
0.3
29.48
S:«
29.35
W
4.2
{9.49
9.10
9.09
?:Jo
29.25
V2
\
4
5
12/18/86 ;
12/19/86 j
12/22/86 i
Wl-
<9.n
*9.45
».24
29.37
0.10
0.3
SPCC.HUN.
grw/lb
70.00
67.60
70.80
57.80
66,55
5.99
9.0
81.70
R-$
n'.n
W
S.B
35.40
72.30
42.50
36.70
28.30 , .
43.04
17.12
39.8
MiSO
39.90
45.20
50.12
7.48
14.9
NC CO NOx C02 ISFC
gn/bhp-hr gn/bhp hr gn/bhp hr gn/Mip-lir Ib/Uip-lir
1.25
1.67
1.08
1.19
1.30
0.26
19.9
1.30
Ul
1.22
0'8
3.5
1.06
1.68
1.04
1.18
1.08
1.21
V.1
l:St
1.16
1.10
1.02
1.08
0.05
5.0
37.79
37.59
35.34
35.46
3A.55
1.33
3.6
36.07
36.78
35. §0
35.81
35.92
0.34
0.9
31.11
36.89
34.70
34.19
32.40
33.86
6.6
32.74
31.04
31.89
•B:8
31.68
1.50
4.7
6.36
5.91
5.86
5.69
5.96
0.29
4.8
5.98
5.79
5.67
6.12
5.89
0.20
3.4
6i)9
6.02
6.35
6.00
6.20
0.18
2.9
6i24
6.49
5.99
6.08
0.30
4.9
863
829
840
840
843
14
1.7
875
ffi
866
875
0.8
867
883
888
892
871
881
10
1.2
i
790
812
809
18
2.2
8.644
.621
0.625
0.625
0.629
0.010
1.6
0.651
0.655
0.651
0.644
m
0.7
0.639
0.658
0.657
0.660
0.645
0.652
°iT
S:»
O.*60t
0.599
0.014
2.3
CVX - 100* X (SIOEV/ MEAN)
c»e
10/02/87
J'age 3
-------
Table 2a
FACILITY
TEST
NO.
RUN
NO.
NVNA HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE ENGINE CORRELATION PROGRAM DATA SHEET
COLO START EMISSIONS DATA
Rowd 2
DATE MRO. SPEC.NUM. HC CO N0« C02
HO/DY/YR IN. NG. gm/lb QM/bhp hr (M/Uip hr o«/Wtp-hr
•src
lb/bhp hr
FORD-DIN
WAN
STDCV
CVX
54
n
86
05/06/87
05/0//87
05/08/87
05/U/87
.50
.05
.2
40.4
1.131 36.142
K271 43^628
4.8
.
8.4
5.966
t:»
6.227
855
860
6.132 857
2.2 0.4
IF-A
366;
MEAN
SIOEV
CVX
54.
.350
.400
.420
.650
1.490
0.139
9.4
34.020
34.770
34.
370
34.794
6.480
6.550
6.610
6.310
6.400
6.474
0.125
.9
847
840
6
0.7
S:&
0.622
0.621
0.624
0.624
GNPG
(Ml I ford)
1
2
3
*
3
6
9
15
08/14/87
08/17/87
08/18/87
08/20/87
53.25
54.45
1.260
1.350
1.220
1.180
34.970
36.460
32.740
31.550
7.470
6.800
7.050
7.110
859
852
850
843
8:8?
0.630
0.623
MEAN
STOEV
CVX
28.94
8.00
.0 .
60.00
8.86
14.8
1.253
0.073
5.8
33.930
2.203
6.5
7.128
0.248
3.5
851
7
0.8
0.632
0.007
1.0
CVX • 100X K (STDEV/ MEAN)
OWVSLEH l
HIGH. PIMC 2
3
HEHN
STOEV
CVX
10/02/87
12/17/8?
12/liW
12/17/8?
12/18^7
12/19/87
29.56
».S9
29.65
29.
-------
Table 3
MVMA HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE EMC I HE CORRELATION PROGRAM DATA SHEET
NOT START ENISSIQMS DATA
Rowd 2
FACILITY
SwNI
(Celt «2>
(C.ll f3)
S«l
(CeU«1)
TEST
NO.
1
§
4
5
*
8
MEAN
STOEV
CVX
1
1
\
6
8
MEAN
SIDEV
CVX
1
§
4
5
$
8
9
10
MIAN
STOEV
CVX
MM
NO.
1
Y
2>*
3
34*
4«*
OATE
NO/OV/VR
10/09/86
10/09/86
10/10/86
10/10/86
10/14/86
10/14/86
10/15/S
10/15/86
8ARO.
STEC.MJN.
IN. KG. gra/lb
29.31
ff-&
29 26
29.32
K'49
t9'.W
*F
r
r
r
••
i^
2
2a«
4^
5
5«*
10/29/86
10/29/86
10/10/86
iO/}0/86
IO/JI/86
10/31/86
11/3/86
11/3/86
11/21/86
11/21/86
11/22/86
11/22/86
11/25/86
11/25/86
11/26/86
11/26/86
12/01/86
12/01/86
1
1
;
4
;
2
(
2
5
(9.49
9.49
9.49
?*4?
>9:41
•9.J5
-9.il
9.43
.07
0.2
9.42
>.41
MO
72.7
at
69.6
75.0
60:9
69.4
U
n!.
70.
80.
79.
84.:
85.
79,7
5.38
6.7 "
38.0
ft*
29.09 70.7
29.09 43.2
?
29.40
29.18
3612
29:3
29.17 33.80
29.23
0
15
0.5
43.83
14.57
33.2
NC
BW/bhp-hr
1.05
0.94
1.02
1.01
0.95
8:3
0.89
5.5
1.11
1.34
1 -03
1 03
1.02
1.01
1.05
1.08
0.11
10.3
0.89
0.92
0.89
1.02
0.83
0.91
5.88
0.89
0.96
1.07
0.93
0.07
4.7
CO
«w/b»ip hr
32.16
: 1.15
: 0.45
;9.i2
: 0.68
i 1.12
50.15
28.06
30.41
1.29
4.1
30.61
30.48
30.84
30.54
28.85
27.98
30.11
29.00
29.80
1.05
1.5
27.14
26.67
29.55
10.50
29.15
29.04
27.23
26.90
27.64
27.60
28.16
1.31
4.7
NO*
go/blip hr
6.58
6.15
6.11
6.06
6.01
6.22
6.06
5.94
6.20
YJ
5.87
5.89
5.88
5.68
6.17
6.32
5.98
6.22
6.00
0.22
3.6
6.41
6.22
6.26
6.26
6.25
6.14
6.47
6.30
6.19
6.30
6.28
0.10
1.6
CO2
gm/bhphr
854
849
820
795
829
821
832
798
2.8
870
864
875
S8
854
863
8
0.9
857
867
887
868
873
8*77
S8
859
870
9
1.0
•SFC
^b/bhp-hr
0.631
0.627
0.606
0.587
0.612
0.607
5.614
0.588
2.6*
0.641
0.637
0.644
o'So
0:628
0 635
i.o
0.627
8:8)
0.639
0.641
01633
0.639
0.630
8.636
.005
0.8
CVX • 100X R
-------
Table 3a
FACILITY
TEST
NO.
RUN
NO.
NVMA HEAVY DUTY CASQLINE ENGINE CORRELATION PROGRAM DATA SHEET
NOT START EMISSIONS DATA
Rowid 2
HC CO NOx C02
DATE
NO/DV/VR
8ARO.
IN. NO.
VCC.NUN.
•ra/lb
hr
CO NOx
hr gn/bhp-hr
8SFC
hr Ib/bhp hr
S*l
(c«U*9)
8
9
10
MEAN
SlOfV
cvX
U
f~m
\.
1:
12/16/86
12/16/86
nnlw
12/17/86
12/18/86
12/18/86
12/19/86
12/19/86
12/22/86
12/22/86
53.10
52.50
3H2
49.60
9.00
48
5.20
.30
28.70
28.01
5.70
5.86
5.98
6.27
6.53
6.4?
5.99
6.09
6.U
810
827
Sol
804
814
810
9
1.1
0.596
0.608
0.605
92
0.590
0.597
ran MM
6
8
MEAN
STDEV
CVX
56
65
66
78
79
8?
05/06/87
05/06/87
m$
05/08/87
05/08/87
29.50
.48
.49
.49
.54
.54
B
48
38.90
31.96
31.08
31.56
30.94
31.70
31.93
35.43
38.16
32.85
6.36
6.30
6.26
6.29
6.23
846
841
&
857
857
810
866
847
0.625
0.621
0.632
0.633
0.603
0.646
0.627
0.012
2.0
EPA
3
4
6
a
9
10
07/23/87
07/23/87
07/27/87
07/27/87
07/28/87
07/28/87
i9.
;9,
I:
10
10
.00
.00
0.
0.
1.14
1.11
29.
29.
29.26
30.30
30.99
30.06
.48
:»
.43
.43
6.77
824
823
MEAN
STDEV
CVX
29.06
fe
49.90
1.00
Y!
29.94
6.51
YJ
828
0.610
GMPG
(Nil ford)
1
4
MEAN
STDEV
CVX
6
9
15
08/14/87
08/17/87
08/18/87
08/20/87
28.75
28.96
28.78
0.14
0.5
52.75
52.94
55.85
4.86
8.7
0.91
0.88
0.92
0.03
2.9
30.20
32.19
28.59
27.52
29.^63
2.03
6.9
7.14
7.18
7.19
V?
840
834
842
6
0.7
0.617
0.612
0.619
0.006
0.981
CVX • 100(ST. DEV./NIAN)
•MM h« (Page 2)
10/01/87
Page 6
-------
Table 3b
HOT STARTS
FNC1LITV TEST MM ORTC BHRO. SPEC HUN HC CO HOx CO2 BSFC
NO. NO. HO/OV/VR IN. HO. 7>s/lb qrtA*tp-tw gn/Uip-tw qn/bhp-hr qn/M*>-hr Jb/b^-hr
CHRVSLER 1 12/17/9? 29.60 V.I 0.957 27.-W1 6.72 824.9 0.6092
HIGH. PWtK 2 12/17/87 29.58 37.3 0.968 27.261 7.05 824.8 0.6090
3 12/17/87 29.60 38.3 0.980 27.217 6.97 821.8 0.6076
1 12/17/87 29.63 38.2 1.011 27.325 7.10 630.1 0.6117
S 12/17/87 29.66 37.3 1.012 26.825 7.11 828.6 0.6O9B
6 12'17/9? 29.67 37.9 0.925 26.117 7.07 828.S 0.6O88
7 12-18/87 29.41 19.7 0.966 29.178 7.00 827.6 0.6115
8 12/18/87 29.13 5O.O 0.971 29.081 7.00 811.9 0.6027
9 12/19/87 29.16 H.9 0.899 29.169 6.97 820.8 0.6068
10 12/19/87 29.16 15.1 1.011 28.900 7.07 811.3 0.600I
HERN 29.55 11.6 0.971 27.856 7.01 821.0 O.6077
STOEV 0.10 5.3 0.038 1.122 0.12 6.1 0.00V
CVZ 0.32 12.76 3.88 1.03 1.66 0.77 0.61
1/29/88
Page 7
-------
Table
FACILITY IUN NO.
full
(C«U
NVMA HEAVY DUTY MX* I ME ENGINE COMELATION PROGRAM DATA SHEET
loin) 2
COLO STAII EMISSIONS DATA • MASS
OKUTf
TINE Of •AIONETIIC SPfClfIC IMHAUST NOx K MC CO NO* C02
DATE OAT PIESSMC HUMIDITY VOLUME FACTO*
NO/OT/VI 24 Ml* IM. HC. GMS/ll SCF MAMS GIAMS CRAMS CMNS
1 10/09/86
2 10/10/86
3 10/14/86 13:
4 10/15/86 08:1
MEAN
ST. DEV.
CVt
29.36
0.08
0.28
£$
57.80
66.60
6.00
9.01
0.977
0.987
0.981
0.925
0.97
0.03
2.94
15.7V
15.45
16.78
479.00
489.00
463.00
462.00
473.25
13.07
2.76
80.60
76.90
78.80
74.10
77.60
2.78
3.58
10932
10890
98
6.12
IMTEC.
FOUEI
ACTUAL IEFCKNCC
•Ml •HP-NI
12.83
0.00
0.00
Mil
(C.ll «)
.48
i TWD
29590
MAM
ST. OCV.
CV1
0.22
1.033
K022
•02
i 01
.43
16.87 469.69 77.91
5.86 473.80 75.60
15.79 464.37 74.13
15.97 467.98 80.01
11395
11517
11473
11318
.47
3.12
0.83
.37
8.4
8.49
0.06
0.72
0.20
SM! I
(C.ll fl)
1
2
4
5
ME AM
ST. PtV.
CVt
11/21/86
11/22/86
11/25/86
11/26/86
12/01/86
09:12
00:43
08:09
08:31
12:42
29.49
29.10
29.09
25 J7
29.20
29.05
?:*2
42.5
43.04
19543
19266
19241
135
18971
0.643
0.967
0.668
0.648
0.620,
0.71
0.15
20.50
13.63
21.26
13.35
15.37
ii377
399.80
466.70
445.50
4)3.60
412.49
431.62
26.48
6. i4
80.10
80.90
77.30
.50
'6.40
r •
K
79.04
11145
11171
11396
11306
11116
11227
119
1
8.44
!:H
8.31
12.S
B:«
12.79
12.77
12.77
12.77
12.77
SMI 1
3
MEAN
ST. DCV.
CVt
ft
0.90
0.03
3.14
1
¥ il M
CVt • 100 (ST. DEV./MEAM)
05/22/87
Page 8
-------
Table
NVNA HEAVY DUTY 6MOLIHE ENCIHC CORRELATION PROGRAM OAIA SHEET
RomJ 2
COLD ITAAI EMISSIONS DMA MASS
FACILITY
FORD DM
"
GNPC
(MM ford)
RUN HO.
54
64
77
86
ME AH
ST. DEV.
CVX
1
5664
5667
HE AH
ST. OCV.
CVX
5
6
9
15
ME AH
ST. DEV.
CVX
DATE
NO/DY/YR
05/06/87
05/07/87
05/08/87
05/14/87
Hi
07/27/87
07/28/87
08/14/87
08/17/87
08/18/87
08/20/87
TIME OF
DAY
24 HRS
11:07
11:43
11:20
9:30
14t59
OL* 24
57*41
08:41
09:21
00:28
10:23
13:53
•ARONETRI
PRESSURE
IH. HG.
29.51
29.50
29.55
29.43
0*05°
Oil7
3|
29 00
29.00
29.06
0.05
0.19
28.00
28.61
28.06
28.96
fl?1
oiSI
: SPECIFIC
HUMIDIIV
GHS/L*
29.07
33.10 •
32.11
63.03
39.33
15.89
40.42
56.12
«:8
49.32
51.24
52.01
3.00
5.77
72.60
59.67
55.26
54.45
Ftr?
14.76
DILUTE
tXHAUSf
VOLUIC
SCF
18590
18622
18580
18511
10570-
46,07
0.25
raj
! '7190
27140
27244
91.3
0.34
37411
37395
37541
37830
2O
0.54
NO> r
FACTOR
0.82
0.84
0.83
0.95
0.06
0.06
6.06
j$
S.89
.90
0.90
0.01
1.28
0.99
5.93
0.91 . .
0.91
0.94
0.04
3.99
MC
GRANS
15.00
16.04
16.06
16.77
15.97
0.73
4.50
17.55
10.17
10.51
21.44
21.20
19.37
1.01
9.35
15.06
1£"34
14!02
15.76
0.95
6.00
CO
GRANS
479.15
511.42
498.48
5/5.49
516.13
41.74
8.09
441.58
452.72
U7.43
462.22
459.86
452.76
8.56
1.89
439.94
459.11
411.97
397.10
427.03
27.80
6.51
NOx
GRANS
79.09
00.46
03.05
82.14
01.10
1.76
2.17
04.06
05.26
06.34
82.19
85.21
84.21
1.64
1.95
95.93
86.68
88.70
89.88
89.80
3.06
3.40
C02
GRANS
t
11416
11342
11347
50. OS
0.44
10992
10997
10856
10906
10929
62.46
0.57
10007
ISRJ
10450
10605
159T91
1.50
FUEL
COHSUNP.
LOS.
0.44
0.45
8.52
8.55
0.49
0.05
0.63
0.15
0.17
4.09
8.09
8.12
0.12
0.04
0.44
0.03
»:»
7.80
7.94
0.10
1.29
INK
PO)
ACTUAL
•HP HR
13.26
15! 19
13.24
0.04
0.27
isios
13.01
13.01
S:?52
12.52
11:8
12.52
0*6l*
Oi24
:c.
*R
REFERFHCC
•NP-HR
13.11
13.11
13.11
13.11
13.11
0.00
0.00
13.10
13.10
13.18
13.10
13.10
13.10
0.00
0.00
12.56
8:8
12.56
12.56
0.00
0.01
CVX • 100 (ST. DEV./NEAH)
CHRVS. 1 12/17/8? 0950 23.58
HIBH. PMtK 2 \Z/\7/VT 1500 29.59
3 12/17/W 2200 29.65
1 12/18/8? 1830 29. +1
5 12/19/87 0810 29.13
MEAN 29.51
STOEV 0.10
CVX 0.33
V.5
39.2 19916
V.7 2OO3S
10.1 19811
13.9 19851
39.7
2.6
6.53
19922
93
0.17
0.8502
0.85S8
0.8509
0.8620
0.8725
0.8583
0.0092
1.08
13.77
11.10
11.S8
15.*
13.71
11.39
O.72
1.98
361.1
379.8
372.1
387.1
386.1
377.1
10.9
2.88
89.63
89.51
89.83
93.12
89.12
90.30
I.SO
I.75
10766
10712
1080O
10700
10721
10710
12
0.39
7.91
7.92
7.98
7.92
7.91
7.91
0.02
0.31
12.86
12.86
12.87
12.97
12.96
12.90
0.06
0.13
10/02/87
13.05
13.05
13.05
13.05
13.05
13.05
0.00
0.00
1/29/88
Page 9
-------
Table 5
rACUITT MM NO.
NVNA HEAVY DUTY GAMtlME ENGINE CORRELATION PROGRAM DATA SHEET
Round 2
NOT START EMISSIONS DATA • MASS
DILUTE
TINE OF BAROMETRIC SPECIFIC EXHAUST NO* K HC CO NOx
DATE DAY PRESSURE HUMIDITY VOLUME FACTOR
NO/DV/VR 24 MRS IN. HG. GNS/L8 SCF • CHANS CHANS GRANS
C02 FUEL
CONSUNP.
CRAM LBS.
GN-NIIFORD
(Pr«ll».)
58
6
09/19/86
09/19/86
03:05:48
03:44:46
28.91
28.91
MEAN
"covT
54.61
ill
55.10
0.75
1.36
0.912
0.912
0.91
3:3
401.17
399.61
84.52
8*.j
10814
10811
7.98
7.98
INTEGRATED
POWER
ACTUAL REFERENCE
BMP-MR BMP-MR
12.38
11.40
!:&
399.05
til
84.40
S:l*
10836
27
0
7.99
SwRI
(Ctll «2)
1
Y
2r
Y
4««
MEAN
ST. DEV.
COVX
10/09/86
10/09/86
10/10/86
10/10/86
10/14/86
JO/14/86
10/15/86
10/15/86
72.70
75.00
-.10
.60
.00
68
rt
0.32
60.90
.03
.
.808
13.21
ItiS
13.47
12.45
KB
11.52
0*6*'
5.29
406.10
403.80
395.50
379.SO
400.40
405.50
396.40
373.80
395.13
12.14
3.07
83.10
81.79
82.21
78.93
78.68
ft0*'
77.30
ft*"
2.54
10788
10836
10858
10355
10820
10697
10864
10385
10700
7.97
f:»
W
7.91
8.01
7.64
08
SURI
-------
Table Sa
NVNA HEAVY DUTY QAMLIHC ENGINE CORRELATION PtOCIAM DA1A SHEET
NOT START EMISSIONS DATA • MASS
FACILITY MM NO.
DILUTE
TINE OF lAROMETRIC SPECIFIC EXHAUST
DATE OAT PRESSURE HUMIDITY VOLUME
NO/DT/VR 24 MS IN. NO. GHS/LB SCF
S*l
(Ccllf9)
1
U
}.
!•
4
4«
5.
MEAN
ST. DEV.
CVt
12/16/86
12/16/86
12/17/86
I?/17/86
12/18/86
12/18/86
12/19/86
12/19/86
12/22/86
12/22/86
11:32
N.A.
09:21
10:01
09:29
10:09
29.47
29.44
29.15
29.34
29
51.10
52.50
49.60
49.00
39.10
39.10
45.20
48.10
TV
uTsi
1676
1688
i 1459
I 1439
! 1418
1406
1393
JlOA
Sl361
31482
120
0
NO* K
FACTOR
0.91
0.90
is
0.89
0.89
0.86
0.86
0.88
0.89
0.89
0.01
2.94
HC
GRANS
9.80
10.4]
10.40
11.11
12.83
10.41
ii:3
11.30
11.13
11.04
0.84
7.65
CO
GRAMS
NO*
GRANS
coe
392.37
370.80
362.18
374.58
411.28
369.10
314.41
314.18
351.09
351.18
365.54
24.05
6.58
77.98
77.64
IM*
78.96
82.54
85.57
85.49
78.90
79.95
81.07
i:S
11074
10956
10618
10667
10792
10607
10552
10478
10595
10676
10702
187
IHTE GRATED
FUEL POM ER
DONSUNP. ACTUAL REFERENCE
L8S. BHP-NR 8NP-NR
8.15
8.05
*:H
7.98
7.80
7.73
7.68
7.78
7.81
7.87
0.15
1.89
!}•<
j:
ij
I
11.18*
13.12
er
FORD DM
78
MEAN
OV06/8/ 11:44
05/OB/87
05/oa/a7
87 05/14/87
8 05/14/87
12:08
i?:ia
15:10
10:50
29.48
38.90
18556
1854Q
18539
0.83
0.81
8:8
0.82
0.81
0.97
0.98,
0.86
10.19
10.11
J8'f?
io:j6
10.76
421.67
409.57
407^
417.59
420.78
465.27
500.71
10.46 432.34
82.15
fll.4)
!3:tf
82.47
82.91
76.65
81.85
82.02
11157
11085
11
11289
11298
10611
11
11152
8.24
8.18
\m Ltt 1
11289 8. Si 1
8.34
.
0611 7.92 1
1364 8.47 1
8.25
.1
13.16
13.11
13.11
13.11
13.11
13.11
13.11
13.11
8:88
i Tr . IV
29.00
29.00
29.06
1.4
45.*
49.89
5i
4<
49.90
l:«
27127
0.89
12.99 388.36
lift t:H
10738
.179
I'M*
13:18
13.179
GM-NILFORD
3
6
9
10
MEAN
SI. OEV.
CVt
S/14/87 09:21
/14/B7 12:09
08/17/87 00:28
08/14/87 21:12
g
28.61
28.78
28.80
0.11
0.37
63..02
11.65
11.98
11.3
11.61
0.47
4.09
402.69
384.46
11.39 357.95
1t:29 156.76
11.02 344.7
347.39
170.10'
21.27
5.75
86.97
92.13
9.17
89.04
.
89.
89.88
89.29
90.78
2.89
3.18
10596
10552
104-73-
10450
10634
10532
68
0.65
7.83
7.J
7.75
0.06
0.74
12.52
0.01
0.07
CV* • (ST. OCV./»«*N)*100
•M» hn» (Page <">
Page 11
10/02/87
-------
Mor srmr-imss DRTA
*••••••••••**•*•«•«!
Table 5b
FRCILITV
MM HO.
DRTE TIME
HO/OV/VR 3* MRS
OIL
BMtO SPEC HUN EX VOL HOx K HC CO MOM
IN.HG. GNS/LB SCF FACTOR GMMS ORflHS CRAMS
C02
INFEO. POWER
FUEL
CONS ACriM. REFERENCE
IBS BMP-MR BHP-HR
CHRVS.
ram. PARK
1
2
3
*
5
6
?
8
9
10
MEAN
STOEV
CVZ
12/17/8?
12/17/8?
12/17/8?
12/17/8?
12/17/8?
12/17/8?
12/18/8?
12/18/8?
12/19/87
12/19/87
1030
1110
1540
1(20
2240
2320
1910
19SO
0920
1000
29.60
29.58
29.60
29.63
29. 66
29.67
29.*1
29.«
2«..«
29.-%
29.55
0.10
0.32
37.1
37.3
30.3
38.2
37.3
37.9
49.7
50.0
•M.9
15.1
11.6
5.3
12.76
19962
19993
19911
200V
20105
19959
19831
19768
19811
19778
19917
116
0.58
0.8487
0.819?
0.8530
0.8521
0.8196
0.8510
0.89V
0.8950
0.8760
0.8769
0.8616
0.0189
2.19
12.31
12.18
12.63
13.02
13.0?
11.91
12.51
12.65
11.61
13.11
12.51
0.19
3.89
351.3
351.4
350.8
352.0
316.3
336.1
378.7
377.9
378.0
371.5
360.0
15.6
4.31
86.62
90.87
89.81
91.45
92.18
91.06
90.86
90.93
90.33
91.63
90.58
1.51
1.7O
10658
10658
10632
10696
1069?
10671
10711
10586
10638
10511
10649
63
0.60
7.85
7.85
7.82
7.88
7.8?
7.84
7.94
7.83
7.86
7.78
7.85
O.O4
0.53
12.89
12.89
12.89
12.88
12.91
12.88
12.98
12.99
12.95
12.96
12.92
0.04
'0.34
13.05
13.05
13.08
13.05
13.05
13.05
13.05
13.OS
13.05
13.05
13.05
0.00
O.OO
1/29/88
Page 12
-------
Table 6
HVHA HEAVY OUTT CASOUNE ENGINE CORRELATION PROGRAM DATA SHEET
Round 2
COtO ITAIir REGRESSION STATISTICS
SPEED REGRESS KM STATS.
TORQUE REGRESSION STATS.
MAKE HP REGRESSION STATS.
FACILITT
SURI
(Cell*?)
RUN NO.
1
MEAN
ST. DEV.
COVX
STANDARD COEf. Of
ERROR Of OETERNINA-
ESTIMATE
STANDARD COEf. Of
ERROR Of DfTERNINA
ESTIMATE TION
59.00
57.00
61.00
57.00
0.9774
0.9724
0.9)10
0.9727
SIOPE
"S?99o"
INTERCEPT
STANDARD COEf. Of
ERROR Of OETERNINA-
ESTINATE TION
SLOPE
1%
8.70
0.2860
0.980
oioto
0.979
•1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
!:.
200.0
5.00
5.00
5-82
0.00
0.00
0.9792
im
0.9764
lift
0.1691
1.000
I'.OOO
INTERCEPT
••••••••••
-0.4
8:7
0.5
&
SwRI
MEAN
ST. DEV.
COW
2*94°
°°
0.9949
0.0005
0.0536
m
0.990
0.994
0.991
0.004
0.363
22.(
10.0
17.5
12.6
71.6
*:
0.9784
0.9783
0.9784
0.0005
0.0544
0.990
0.990
0.993
0.005
0.504
:l:»
0.0
0.0
•0.5
0.6
•115.5
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
0.9822
0.9825
0.9825
0.000)
0.0269
0.990
0.998
0.005
0.501
•8-
•9'
.1
•0.1
0.2
•2U.9
SUM
(Cellfl)
1
MEAN
ST. DEV.
COVX
64^00
64.00
i1:S8 8
64.00
0.00
0.00
0.994)
0.9942
0.9942
.9941
.9942
0.9942
0.0001
0.0071
0.998
0.998
0.996
0.996
11.0
12.0
14.0
17l8
14.2
iJ:f
5.00
5.00
5.00
0.9615
.9796
.9787
5.00
0.960
0.960
.990
,964
.005
.557
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
•DIV/OI
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
0.9656
0.9634
0.
0.990
0.990
0.990
0.990
0.5
0.0
(C«llf9)
1
4
5
MEAN
ST. DEV.
COVt
62.00
64.00
65.00
60.00
54.00
61.00
0.9947
0.9942
0.9940
0.9948
0.9959
o!ooo7
0.0744
0.997
0.99)
0.995
.994
.002
.201
15.0
26.0
2).0
24.0
15.0
21.0
5.8
27.6
0.9706
.9772
..9774
0.9791
0.9773
1.030
.990
.900
..990
0.980
0.994
0.021
2.066
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.7
IDIV/OI
5.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
vl
0.9786
0!9641
1.0)0
w
1.C
.000
0.990
0.6
fORO-DM
54
86
MEAN
ST. DEV.
COVX
8:
66.50
54.50
55.56
15.89
28.59
0.9985
0.99)9
0.9942
5.9961
0.9957
0.0021
0.2130
1.000
0.998
0.999
1.000
0.999
0.001
0.085
4.5
2.8
29.
1.2
1.4
0.9
66.6
.989
o!oio
1.006
COVX • 100(ST. DEV./MEAN)
er
iii
0.
10/02/87
Page 13
-------
Table 6a
NWW HEAVY OUTT 6ASOUNE ENGINE CORRELATION PROGRAM DATA SHEET
Round J
COUt START REGRESSION STATISTICS
SPEED REGRESSION STATS.
TORQUE REGRESSION STATS.
MAKE HP REGRESSION STATS.
fACIIITT RUN NO.
STANDARD COEF. Of
ERROR Of DETERMINA
ESTIMATE TION
mmmmmmmmmummmmmmmmmm
SlOPC INTERCEPT
STANDARD COEF. OF
ERROR Of OETERMINA-
ESTIMATE TION
SLOPE INTERCEPT
STANDARD COEF. OF
ERROR OF OETERNINA-
ESTIMATE TION
SIOPE INTERCEPT
EPA
ST. DEW. Or
COVt 0.54
0.99J
0.996
6.S
w
tt
0.9885
0.9884
0.5
•0.4
•0.3
•19.6]
2.72
0.9910
0.9900
n
1.71
4.09
(MM
(Mil ford)
6
9
15
MEAN
17. i
U.08
17,, 46
•6.
•6.8
•*,»
9.66
A.98B7
0.9B97
0.9884
0.99
0.00
0.06
8.974
.973
0.973
0.972
0.97
0.00
0.08
4.04
4.04
0.986
0.987
0.99
0.00
0.09
0.8
0.8
0.8
COVt • 100(ST. DEV./MEAN)
10/02/87
CMtVSLCM
HI en.
i
2
3
1
9
tKRN
ST ocv
eta
99.9
93.6
93.0
71.6
39.7
13.•
29.33
0.99?
O.997
0.991
0.999
0.997
O.OO2
0.18
0.990
O.99O
0.909
0.909
1.003
0.992
O.OO6
0.61
26.01
27.17
30.23
31.31
-9.73
21.22
17.11
•2.01
21.9
22.2
22.O
21.9
M.9
21.2
1.9
7.27
0.919
0.917
0.99O
O.963
0.991
O.OO7
O.69
O.97O
0.970
O.971
0.97*
0.9*3
O.971
0.006
O.4O
-0.93
-I.OO
-0.9*
-0.19
-1.0*
-O.9O
0.23
26. O1
6
7
7
7
6
9
9
9.71
0.973
0.972
0.972
0.973
0.979
0.971
O.OO3
0.30
O.9*2
O.9*2
O.9*2
O.9*6
0.900
O.9B1
0.003
O.29
-O.OI
-O.O2
0.01
0.21
O.O6
O.O9
O.O9
1*9.21
1/29/88
Page 14
-------
Table 7
NVNA NEAVY OUTV CAS&INE ENGINE CORRELATION PROGRAM DATA SHCE1
Romi 2
NOf STA4T REGRESSION SIATISIICS
SPCEO REGRESSION STATS.
TOMUE REGRESSION SIATS.
MAKE HP REGRESSION STATS.
f ACUITY
ON NILFORO
STANDARD OXF. Of
ERROR Of OETERMINA-
RUM NO. ESTIMATE TION
WOW
STANDARD COEF. Of
ERROR Of OfTERM)NA-
INTERCEPT ESTIMATE TION
SI OK
STANDARD COEF. Of
ERROR Of OCTERMINA-
INTERCEPT ESTIMATE IION
HOP*
58
6
Mi AN
ST. OfV.
COVt
0.9982
0.9983
1.0019
11.4
10.
0.9846
0.9889
0.9849
0.9849
9.47
0.9900 0.9794
0.
1.209
3.914
3.
854
8 .9916
.
9918
3.
0.
0.9905 0
hfi) I
1
.9964
0.9953
0.9960
0.9990
MEAN 51.75
ST. DEV. 2.66
COVX 5.03
0.0190 0.2491
11.
M
•'
j
•.5
i.oo
•378.67 8.05
4.000
0.9755 0.9800
?.ooo
2.000
i!ooo
0.9760 0.9750 1.125 4.875 0.9791 1.0000 0.1
0.0023 0.0076 1.126 0.154 6.0020 0.0006 6!
0.2364 0.7753 100.088 7.252 0.2041 0.0000 97. J
SMRI
5
6«
B«
57.00
48.00
32.00
32.00
32.00
32.00
0.9954
0.9966
0.9986
0.9985
6.9986
0.9985
.0010
.0000
.9970
.0030
MEAN 37.00
ST. OEV. 9.87
COM 26.68
0.9979
0.0012
0.1234
.0000
0.9964
0.0072
0.7256
•10.00
0.00
9.00
6.00
3.00
1.00
898
0.9820 0.9900 -1.
0.981? 0.9900 6.
0.9803
0.9822
0.9813
O.VBDO
0.9802
0.9807
0.9811
0.0009
0.0880
0
0
1.0000
1.0000
.9800
.9800
0.9BOO
0.9800
0.98/5
0.0089
0.8976
0
0
0.000
0.000
.000
.000
0.000
0.000
•0.125
0.154
•282.843
4.000
4.000
4.000
4.000
4.000
4.000
4.000
4.000
0.000
0.000
0.9842
0.9850
0.9850
0.9842
0.9840
0.9849
1.0000
1.0100
(Ccitfl)
1«
i:
MEAN
ST. OEV.
awx
44.00
47.00
45.00
46.00
48.00
46.00
46.00
tt'K
46.00
46.00
46
2!
0.9973
0.9970
0.9971
0.9970
i.997.
S.9970
0.99
0.99;
0.9990
1.0050
0.9980
1.0000
1.0060
?.9970
.0010
NA
0.9990
1.0010
4.00
6.00
5.00
°i°00
2.00
0.00
NA
6.00
•i.OO
0.9830
0.9840
0.9824
9.9830
).9B20
?.9812
0.9800
0.9800
0.9800
1.9800
1.9900
.9900
i .9800
I .9800
I :9800
.9800
o:i
0.0131 0.1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
tDIV/OI
• • Canflrvatory hot cycU.
OWX * 100(SI. OEV./MEAN)
hr
Page 15
-------
Table 7a
MVNA HEAVY OUTT GASOLINE ENGINE CORRELATION PROGRAM DATA SHEET
Round 2
HOT STAIT REGRESSION STATISTICS
SP«D REGRESSION ITATS.
TORQUE (EGRESSION STATS.
MAKE HP RECKS*ION STATS.
FACILITY HUM NO.
SuRI 1
(C«ll«9) 1*
2*
MfAN
IIOEV
covt
STANDAtO COEF. OF
ERROR OF DETERNIHA-
ESTIMATE TION
8:88
0.9MB
0.9966
8:8$?
0.9961
J.9978
SlOW INTERCEPT
l.doic
0.9900
1.0000
0.9970
1.0020
1.0000
0.9990
?:828 -t:
STANDAtO COEF. OF
EURO! OF DETERNINA-
ESTINATE TION
LOO
1.00
.00
.00
.9816
0.9815
0.9795
0.9791
0.9797
.9794
SLOPE INTERCEPT
STANDARD COEF. OF
ERROR OF OETERNINA-
ESTINATE TION
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
AlV/Ol
000
000
000
000
000
4.000
4.000
0.
mi
0.9875
o.9ar
SLOPE INTERCEPT
FORD-DIM
fi
AS
66
78
79
87
88
MEAN
STDEV
COVX
25.80
27.50
1.46
5.3
0.9999
0 999}
8.9969
.9989
0.9991
0.9991
1.0001
0.0
roow
1.000)
K0016
1.0014
1.0011
0.0005
0.0
0.041
0.4M
1052.1
0.9918
0.9925
0.9919
0.9924
0.9927
0.9930
0.
0
0.0
.0060
.0000
,0026
.DOS)
1.0001
1.0014
1.0082
1.0085
1.0040
0.0035
0.3
•0.760
0.796
• 1 .463
•1.410
•0.827
0.425
•51.4
1.900
1.800
1.860
3.160
1>20
1.860
2.013
0.466
23.2
0.
0.9963
0.9890
0.9965
0.9966
0.9956
0.9957
0.9954
0.0026
0.3
1.0122
1.0133
1.0101
0.0030
0.3
•0.161
0.166
•103.1
EPA
3654
3662
3665
3666
3668
3669
MEAN
STDEV
COVX
20.41
.41
20.38
20.42
20.42
20.54
20.41
0.06
OJ
0.9994
0.9994
0.9994
0.9994
0.9994
0.9994
0.9994
0.0000
0.0
0.9902
0.9896
0.9994 0.9923
0.9994 0.9943
0.9916
0.9894
•992
0.9949
0.9941
0.9879
0.9802
0.9863 ,
0.0031
0.3
0.9924
.9928
.9932
0.9941
0.9922
0.9929
0.9928
0.0007
0.1
•0.242
•0.129
•0.16
•0.192
•0.082
•0.146
0.179
•0.3J2
•0.167
0.076
•45.7
2.601
2.604
.601
(.691
2.6S4
2.696
2.619
0.050
i.9
.9904
0.9907
0.9904
0.9911
6.9911
0.9889
i-m
0.9926
0.9895
CM MILFORD
9
10
15
16
MEAN
STDFV
COVt
17.34
17.76
17.74
21.14
17.28
17.09
17.91
17.94
18.03
0.9996
0.9995
0.9995
0.9994
0.9996
0.9996
0.9995
0.0001
0.0
1.0045
1.0044
1.0044
1.0041
1.0042
1.0044
1.004
1.0044
0.0002
0.0
8:3!o8
8:%$
0.9932
?.9923
0.9759
.9765
0.9764
0.9748
8.9764
.9750
8.9762
.0013
0.1
1.651
1.605
1.551
1.837
1.649
0.9949
0.0003
0.0
0.9869
0.0010
0.1
:&
1.749
0.'620
0.710
0.680
0.041
6.1
COVX = 100(51 OEV./
hr (page 2)
MEAN)
10/05/87
Page 16
-------
HOT sr
-------
Table 8
NVMA HEAVY DUTY GASOUNC ENGINE CORRELATION PROGRAM DATA SHEET
Round 2
COtD START TEMPERATURE DATA
CARI. AIR TEMP.
OIL SUMP TEMP.
FUEL PUMP TEMP.
FACILITY
SMRI
(Cell*2)
SMRI
(Cell*3)
SMRI
(Cellfl)
SMRI
(CellfV)
TEST NO.
1
\
4
MEAN
ST. DEV.
covt
1
2
3
4
MEAN
SI. DEV.
covt
1
2
3
4
5
MEAN
ST. OEV.
covt
1
}
5
MEAN
STD.DEV.
covt
DATE
NO/DY/VR
10/09/86
10/10/86
10/14/86
10/15/86
10/29/86
10/30/86
10/31/86
11/3/86
11/21/86
11/22/86
11/25/86
11/26/86
12/01/86
12/16/86
12/17/86
12/16/86
12/19/86
12/22/86
IIP* or
DAY
24 NRS
09:23
08:45
08-37
09i04
09:32
09:12
08:43
08:09
08:31
12:42
10:42
8:35
10:51
8:41
8:49
AMBIENT
TEMP.
DEC. F.
72.0
75^
2:4
74.0
74.0
76.0
72.0
74.0
1.6
2.2
74.0
74.0
76.0
8:H
74.8
74.0
76.0
74.0
77.0
79.0
76.0
2.1
2.8
At 0 •
DEC. F.
85.0
76.0
90.0
95.0
1;!
73.0
73.0
75.0
73.7
1.2
1.6
76.0
76.0
N.A.
73.0
73.0
75.0
1:1
N.A.
118.0
104.0
91.0
103.0
108.3
7.7
At 300 •
DEC. F.
116.0
ltt:S
116.0
MV
2.6
136.0
133.0
130.0
133.0
3.0
2.3
124.0
125.0
132.0
130.0
129.0
127.8
3.9
3.0
148.0
116.0
120.0
133.0
123.0
128.0
12.6
10.0
At 900 •
DEC. F.
113.0
125.0
117.0
113.0
4:8
110.0
106.0
105.0
107.0
2.6
2.5
118.0
116.0
118.0
125.0
123.0
119.3
132.0
129.0
129.0
104.0
111.0
121.0
12.6
10.4
At 0 »
DEC. F.
112.0
105.0
122.0
137.0
119.0
13.9
11.7
72.0
70.0
74.0
72.0
2.0
2.8
76.0
76.0
75.0
72.0
71.0
74.8
1.9
2.5
N.A.
147.0
142.0
112.0
132.0
133.3
15.5
11.6
At 300 •
DEC. F.
180.0
177.0
183.0
179.0
W
1.4
115.0
118.0
118.0
117.0
1.7
1.5
183.0
182.0
183.0
119.0
116.0
166.8
31.8
19.1
204.0
201.0
194.0
189.0
190.0
195.6
6.7
3.4
At 900 •
DEC. F.
207.0
212.0
210.0
6.4
3.1
254.0
253.0
254.0
253.7
0.6
0.2
214.0
214.0
260.0
259.0
259.0
236.8
26.3
11.1
218.0
218.0
219.0
202.0
210.0
213.4
7.i
3.4
At 0 •"
DEC. F.
76.0
8:8
75.0
^3
71.0
71.0
74.0
72.0
1.7
2.4
75.0
73.0
N.A.
8:1 '
73.3
1.5
2.1
N.A.
73.0
73.0
74.0
74.0
n.5
0.6
0.8
At 300 •
OEG. F.
••••••••rat
79.0
8:8
78.0
1:!
0.6
75.0
74.0
76.0 .
75.0
1.0
1.3
78.0
76.0
75.0
74.0
75.0
75.8
1:1
75.0
74.0
75.0
75.0
76.0
75.0
0.7
0.9
At 900 •
OEG. F.
••••••••••I
g-0
84:o
1:|
1.5
83.0
83,0
853
63.7
ll4
A2.0
79 0
7?:o
8:8
79.0
80.0
81:8
80.0
64.0
81 4
]' j
2:i
N.A. • Not Available.
COVX • 100(ST. OEV./MEAN)
ct
Page 18
-------
limn- oa
HVMA HEAVY DUTT GASOLINE ENGINE CORRELATION PROGRAM DATA SHEET
•otnd 2
COLD START TEMPERATURE DATA
CARB. Aid TEMP.
OIL SUMP TEMP.
FUEL PUMP TEMP.
FACILITY
FORO-D8N
EPA
GMPG
(Ml I ford)
CMRY9UK
man. rmnc
TEST NO.
54
86
MEAN
ST. OEV.
covt
3653
3656
3660
3664
3*67
MEAN
ST. 0€V.
COVX
3
6
9
15
MEAN
ST. OEV.
COVX
i
2
•3
•4
9
ICKH
ST atv
CW*
DATE
MO/OY/YR
05/06/87
OVO//87
05/08/87
05/14/87
7/22/87
7/23/87
7/24/87
7/27/87
7/28/87
08/14/87
08/17/87
08/18/87
08/20/87
12/17/87
12/17/87
12/17/87
12/18/87
12/19/87
YltBF Of
I inc v*
DAY
24 HftS
11:07
11:43
11:28
09:30
14:55
07:24
07:41
08:41
13:11
09:21
00:28
10:23
13:53
omo
1900
2200
ieso
0840
AMHIFHT
Mnvi civ i
TEMP.
DEC. F.
78.3
7Bi6
Ttt
• .0
76.0
75.0
74.5
75:8
74.9
0.7
1.0
72.6
74.3
73.0
72.1
73.0
0.9
1.3
6».S
72.4
72.2
73. »
74.0
72.4
1.9
2.63
At 0 •
DEC. F.
75.2
»:!
73.4
T?
2^3
73.8
33
T§:$
72.7
0.7
1.0
71 !5
74.6
73.6
73.5
1.4
1.9
70
71
72
71
l.O
l.4|
At 300 •
DEC. F.
111.2
109.4
113.0
116.6
1J2}6
2>
126.7
130.0
126.6
HW
128.6
• O • r
123.0
137.6
114.6
26.3
23.0
108
108
1O8
108
0.0
O.OO
At 900 •
DEC. F.
136.4
129^2
129}7
4'.0
115.0
115.1
117.6
ll?:o
117.1
?:?
102.0
105.1
102.0
98.9
102.0
2.5
2.5
102
104
104
103
1.2
1.12
Wl V
At 0 8
DEC. F.
75.2
69.8
75.2
73.4
Is
3i5
72.1
71.7
72.4
72.0
72.0
72.0
0.3
0.3
73.4
71.4
74.8
74.4
73.5
1.5
2.1
^
68
72
6«
2.9
9.93
^w* m > +.nr ,
At 300 •
DEC. F.
120.2
114.8
122.0
118.4
W
?'.6
114.7
114.0
116.1
110.4
118.1
114.7
2.9
2.5
128.0
204.5
115.0
102.6
137.5
45.8
33.3
in
114
114
119
1.7
1.83
At 900 8
DEC. F.
251.6
Sl:t
253.4
*Pft*
Oi4
240.1
248.9
243.0
243.0
246.2
244.2
227'3
243 !o
234.8
234.5
6.5
2.8
294
294
298
299
2.9
O.«tl
T«^
At 0 •
DEC. F.
77.0
75'.2
1:!
3.0
72 .'i
m
72.3
0.3
0.4
76.0
70.7
73.4
72.2
73.1
2.2
3.1
7O
TO
72
71
1.2
I.»S
i. rvrw IKPV
At'300*"
DEC. F.
77.0
£:*
78.8
77.J
2i2
74.2
73.7 .
74.2
73.0
74.4
73.9
w
76.0
74.8
81.0
79.3
77.8
2.9
3.7
72
72
79
79
1.7
2.97
"ZTwo"*)
DEC. F.
80 "*"
B2*.4
80^.6.
r.a
w
78.0
^
78.2
0.4
0.5
78.0
76!o
75.8
3.0
4.0
7*
7»
80
77
2.9
2-W
1/29/88
Page 19
-------
Table 9
MVHA HEAVY DUTY GASOUME ENGINE CORRELATION PROGRAM DATA SHEET
Round 2
HOT START TEMPERATURE DATA
FACILITY RUN NO.
TIME OF AMBIENT .......
DATE DAY TEMP. At 0 •
MO/DY/VR 24 HRS DEC. F. OEG. F.
CARS. AIR TEMP. OIL SUMP TEMP. FUEL PUMP TEMP.
At 300 •
DEC. F.
At 900 •
OEG. F.
At 0 •
OEG. F.
At 300 •
OEG. F.
At 900 •
OEG. F.
At 0 •
OEG. F.
At 300 •
OEG. F.
CM MlIFORD 58 09/19/86
(preti*.) 09/19/86
6 09/19/86
09/19/86
MEAN
ST. DEV.
COVX
03:05
03:44
06:57
07:36
73. 8
73.8
.9
.8
Q
75
73.8
0.0
0.0
103.0
102.8
m
w
o.S
95.2
95.00
Si
95.1
0-5
O.S
164.9
167.8
163.0
168.0
165.9
i:*
182.8
182.8
182.7
185.5
183.5
1.4
0.7
251.3
250.5
8:1
251.6
147.3
1531
111 7
148.4
148.9
149.0
149.5
149.6
149,5
At 900 •
OC6. F.
153.3
153.5
153.1
SMRI
(Cellf?)
1
1«*
2««
3a«
4
4««
MEAN
ST. DEV.
COVX
10/09/86
10/09/86
10/10/86
10/10/86
10/14/86
10/14/86
10/15/86
10/15/86
10:03
10:45
12:30
13:10
13:30
14:10
09:25
10:11
70.0
70.0
73.0
75.0
73.0
8:1
74.0
^8
2.4
81.0
94.0
93.0
112.0
96.0
115.0
103.0
92.0
98.3
11.2
11.4
116.0
!&*
115.0
116.0
110.0
115.0
114.0
'iv
1.8
114.0
109.0
114.5
115.0
117.0
22.0
14.0
118.0
'JV
3.3
122^ 212
114.0 209
210.0
itt:8
m
":8
213.0
209.5
2.*
1.4
203.0
!o?:8
207.0
211.0
209.0
209.0
203.0
W
1.6
204.0
206.0
211.0
211.0
207.0
»:S
207.0
207.1
2.6
1.2
87.0
8:8
81.0
80.0
80.0
81.0
83.0
•w
2.8
83.0
.1:8
84.0
l;i
84.0
*to
0.9
09.0
tt:S
91.0
89.0
91.0
90.0
89.0
•M
1.1
SM«|
(Cellf3)
2*
4«
6»
7
8«
MEAN
ST. OEV.
COVX
10/29/86
10/29/86
10/30/86
10/30/86
10/31/86
10/31/86
11/03/86
11/03/86
09:
10:
2»:38
10:18
09:17
09:57
09:44
10:24
10:12
10:52
%s
77.0
78.0
76.0
76.0
76.0
78.0
77.1
1.0
1.3
83.0
88.0
91.0
84.0
8:1
88.0
88.0
-------
Table 9a
NVMA HEAVY DUTY GASOUNE EMCINE CORRFLA1ION PROGRAM DAIA SHEET
Round 2
HOT STARI TEMPERATURE DATA
CARB. AIR TEMP.
OIL SUMP TEMP.
FUEL PUMP TEMP.
FACILITY RUN NO.
SwRI 1
(Cell«9) la
2a
3
3«
4
4a
5
5a
MEAN
ST. DEV
COVX
FORD-DBN 55
56
65
ISA
78
TV
67
88
MEAN
ST. DEV
COVX
EPA 3654
3655
3657
3658
3661
3662
3665
3666
3668
3669
MEAN
ST. DEV.
COVX
CM -MIL FORD 3
*
9
10
15
16
MEAN
ST. OEV.
COVX
COVX = 100(SI. DEV.
mvma ht
DATE
MO/DY/YR
12/16/86
12/16/86
12/17/86
12/17/86
12/18/86
12/18/86
12/19/86
12/19/86
12/22/86
12/22/86
05/06/87
05/06/87
OS/07/87
o<>/o//87
us/»>fl/8r
ir>/i*/B7
OS/U/87
05/U/67
07/22/87
07/22/87
07/23/87
07/23/87
07/24/87
07/24/87
07/27/87
07/27/87
07/28/87
07/28/87
08/14/87
08/14/87
08/17/87
08/14/87
08/18/87
08/18/87
08/20/87
08/20/87
/MEAN)
TIME or
DAY
24 HRS
11:22
12:02
9:15
9:55
11:32
12:12
9:21
10:01
9:29
10:09
11:48
12:28
12:23
13:03
1?:0fl
1?:48
10:10
10:50
15:47
16:28
08:16
08:49
08:20
08:57
09:56
09:20
13:59
14:44
09:21
12:0*
818
10:23
18:02
m\
AMBIENT
TEMP.
DEC. F.
75.0
75.0
74.0
76.0
74.0
74.0
77.0
77.0
79.0
80.0
76.1
2.1
2.8
80.1
80.6
78.8
60.2
60.6
60.6
80.2
80.8
80.2
0.6
0.8
75.0
74.0
R:!
76.6
76.5
B:i
77.0
76.2
75.7
1.2
1.5
72.6
72.6
73.1
n/a
73.0
73.2
8:?
72.6
0.5
0.7
At 0 a
DEC. F.
85.0
86.0
130.0
85.0
82.0
85.0
88.0
84.0
86.0
104.0
91.5
14.8
16.2
89.6
89.6
87.8
87.8
67.8
89.6
89.6
89.6
88.9
0.9
1.0
87.6
87.5
87.3
88.0
87.5
88.6
87.2
87.6
88.0
89.1
87.8
0.6
». 7
90.0
88.0
87. j
90.2
87.0
73.0
»:*
86.7
LI
At 300 a
DEC. F.
135.0
111.0
129.0
128.0
125.0
123.0
126.0
133.0
131.0
135.0
127.6
7.1
5.6
114.8
114.8
114.8
116.6
114.8
116.6
120.2
120.2
116.6
2.4
2.0
128.9
113.4
litt
129.2
129.6
128.6
115.7
131.7
127.0
124.8
7.0
5.6
' ifci " "
l&7
122.0
122.6
126.2
111.4
120.4
13
At 900 a
DEC. F.
109.0
116.0
108.0
117.0
125.0
128.0
87.0
109.0
110.0
123.0
113.2
11.7
10.4
134.6
129.2
114.8
113.0
125.6
125.6
129.2
127.4
124.9
7.4
5.9
108.0
103.6
109.0
121.0
118.0
116.4
&°:8
89.1
105.9
111.6
10.7
9.6
101.0
103.0
Ui:2
101.0
103.4
1»:l
107.4
9.2
8.6
At 0 •
DEC. F.
174.0
176.0
203.0
m.o
164.0
182.0
180.0
172.0
186.0
214.0
182.4
15.2
8.4
174.2
176.0
172.4
176.0
174.2
176.0
174.2
176.0
174.9
1.3
0.8
160.3
168.3
163.2
165.0
171.0
168.9
12:i
169.8
176.4
168.2
4.7
2.8
143.0
141.0
142.1
117.5
135.0
140.9
141.8
169.3
141.3
14.1 .
10.0
At 300 »
DEC. F.
200.0
208.0
210.0
195.0
200.0
197.0
259.0
206.0
197.0
193.0
206.5
19.3
9.3
201.2
204.8
205.0
204.8
?03.0
?01.0
199.4
199.4
202.3
2.1
1.1
198.8
201.4
199.9
199.9
198.6
206.2
200.4
199.9
198.2
201.3
200.5
2.3
1.1
176.0
176.0
174.8
158.3
175.0
182.3
171.9
175.3
173.7
6.9
4.0
_. .
X
At 900 •
DEC. F.
215.0
209.0
214.0
212.0
216.0
217.0
217.0
213.0
210.0
220.0
214.3
3.4
1.6
257.0
258.8
258.8
258.8
258.8
258.8
258.8
257.0
258.4
0.8
0.3
250.5
264.6
259.7
257.4
255.0
255.0
256.0
249.0
257.0
256.2
256.0
4.4
1.7
245.0
246.0
20'*
244 0
241.1
235.8
246.8
240.5
S.7
.6
At 0 •
DEC. F.
84.0
86.0
78.0
84.0
79.0
84.0
85.0
86.0
83.0
82.0
83.1
2.7
3.3
84^2
78.8
75.2
8:i
84.2
82.4
82.4
82.0
J.3
4.0
79.3
79.4
ft?
B:?
Si
78.8
80.1
79.9
2.2
2.8
76.0
73 0
B:J
N/A
74.4
2.0
2.7
At 300
DEC. F.
••••••••I
79.0
79.0
79.0
81.0
77.0
81.0
fro1
79.0
81.0
79.4
1.3
1.7
Tsla
80.6
78.8
8*
82.4
82.4
82.4
81.1
1.6
2.0
80.8
82.3
8:1
80.9
BO'I
81 !0
83.2
81.7
1.1
1.4
" a j "
H:i
78.0
80.7
77.8
N/A
76.6
i:t
Paae
• At 900 •
DEC. F.
••••••••••••
86.0
87.0
85.0
86.0
84.0
84.0
fi:l
80.0
81.0
84.0
2.5
3.0
80.6
82.4
80.6
82.4
82.4
84.2
84.2
86.0
82.9
1.9
2.2
82.0
. 03.6
fr.l
83.0
fi'E
84 .'8
83.4
0.7
0.9
77.0
76!o
76l5
N/A
76.4
1.1
10/02/87
21
-------
Table 9b
NOT mm
CMta MIR renr OIL sww rtnr FUEL runr renr
DATE • MMMWM«MMMMMM MMMWWMHHMttHM MMMMMMMHMM*
FACILITY nsr MO na/ov/v*. rinc MWICMT AT o sec nr soo sec AT «oo sec AT o sec AT MO sec AT «oo sec AT o sec AT 300 sec AT «oo sec
I 12/17/67 IO3O 69.9 69 IO6 1OI 12O 174 MO 72 7* 7*
HI CM. PMKK 2 12/I7/B7 1110 M.7 «« 1M 1O2 1*1 ITU 240 7* 7» 7»
3 12/17/67 1940 72.1 *2 1O» 1O4 199 174 240 79 74 77
4 12/17/67 l«20 72.2
9 12/17/67 224O 72.6
« 12/17/67 2S2O 71.*
7 12/16/67 KtO 74.9 61 IO6 1O4 7» 7* 6O
6 12/16/67 1990 79.• 64 1O6 IO* 64 .7* OO
• 12/l«/67 0930 72.1 61 IO6 IO4 I2O 174 24O 7» 7* 6O
10 12/19/07 1000 71.6 76 1O6 1O4 144 16O 24O 7« 7* 6O
WAN 71.9 69.3 106.0 1OJ-* 133.* 174.0 24O.O 7ft.O 79.7 >O.4
»r OCV 1.6 4.9 0.0 l.» 12.1 2.6 O.O 3.9 0.6 ' 2.O
CVX 2.49 7.99 O.OO 1.9* 9.11 1.61 O.OO 9.IO I.OO 2.93
*MTA rOit TEST NOS. 4-6 AMD OIL TOT rOK TC3T MB. 7*6 HOT AVNIUWLe
2/1/88
Page 22
-------
NVNA HtAVt 001» CASOUNE EHGIHf COMCIMION PROGRAM DM* SHEET
lound 2
234 H. Lt. AT 2000 RPM SIEAOT STATE EMISSIONS DATA
(Av*r»t* of thrM run* per tnt)
Table 10
DATE
FACIUTY TEST *)._ MO/DT/tt
....«.........•-•«
10/H/
jff/.lV
BAROMETRIC smmc
EM I HE PRESSURE NUNIOITV
MOMS IH. HC. ONS/IR
OHUTE
EXHAUST
VOLUME
set
M0» K
rACTCM
CVX • 100CST. DEV. /MEAN)
* CRAMS / 3 •InutM
MASS
HC
G*AMS*
•••••••
0.021*
O.OT9
0.064
S:SS
0.033
0.045
0.01
30.11
i.Qii
0.027
0.032
0.046
0.025
0.01
58.83
0.129
0.104
.06
MASS
CO
GRAMS*
10.36
10.05
*:K
9.92
0.44
4.40
is"
8.54
..59
7.35
7.12
6.82
6.85
5.58
5.32
6.34
0.82
11.00
13.36
8.94
:8
.°)
08/29/67
3 •InutM
reading not I nc luted In MEAN or ST. DEV..
Page 23
-------
I.Ill If III.
found 2
MVMA HLAVY OUIT CASOtlMf EN(.INE CORRELAIION PRU.KAN OAIA SHEET
Rmnd 2
214 Fl. IB. AT 2000 RPN SIEADT SIAIE EHISSIONS DATA
(Average of three runs per lest)
FACILITY
FORD OBN
EPA
GMPG
TESl NO.
1
2
4
MEAN
SI. DEV.
COVX
1659
1661
36/0
MEAN
SI. DEV.
COVX
5
8
17
MEAN
SI. OEV.
COVX
DATE
NO/DY/VR
05/05/87
05/07/87
05/07/87
05/08/87
7/23/87
7/24/87
7/28/87
08/14/87
08/17/87
08/21/87
BAROMETRIC
ENGINE PRESSURE
HOURS IN. HG.
169.8 29.61
178.04 29.50
180.46 29.51
183.93 29.46
29.52
0.06
0.21
29.15
29.14
29.03
29.11
0.07
0.23
28.79
28.76
28.94
28.83
0.10
0.33
SPECIFIC
HUMIDITY
GNS/LB
22.6
41.5
47.3
26.2
34.4
11.9
34.54
53.4
70.95
64.42
62.92
8.87
14.10
61.04
51.66
57.07
57.92
4.75
8.20
DILUIE
EXHAUST
VOLUME
SCF
5613
lit*
5495
5549
49
0.88
3993
4013
4010
•4005
10.79
0.27
5555
5598
5551
5568
8
NOx K
FACIOR
0.800
0.860
0.880
0.810
0.818
0.039
4.61
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
0.000
0.000
0.947
0.909
0.922
0.926
0.019
2.086
MASS
HC
GRANS*
0.19
0.097
0.078
0.059
0.106
0.058
54.86
.041
0.049
0.024
0.017
0.018
48.43
0.029
0.30
0.021
0.117
0.159
136.133
MASS
CO
GRANS*
11.86
10.24
8.88
7.97
9.74
4.08
17.39
8.40
9.18
18.14
11.91
5.41
45.44
12.33
10.00
10.79
11.04
1.18
10.73
MASS
NOx
GRANS*
16.41
18.16
19.70
16.92
17.80
1.47
8.24
15.69
15.81
15.62
15.71
0.10
0.61
15.25
14.25
13.40
14.30
0.93
6.48
MASS
C02
GRANS*
3180
3155
3140
3198
3168
26
0.82
3191
3215
3185
3197
15.48
0.48
3170
3155
3215
3180
31
1
FUEL
CON SUMP.
LBS.
2.25
HI
2.25
2 23 '
5 02
Oi96
2.23
2.24
2.23
2.23
0.01
0.26
1.56
2.36
2.38
2.10
0.47
22.27
INIEG.
POtftR
BNP HR
4.44
4.44
4.42
4.44
4.44
0.01
0.23
4.45
4.45
4.45
4.45
0.00
0.00
4.47
4.47
4.44
4.46
0.02
0.40
COVX = 100(ST. DEV./MEAN)
• GRAMS / 3 ainutes
09/22/87
CMRYSLCR
HIGH.
1
2
3
4
ICfM
sr DEV
cvx
12/17/07
12/17/97
12/17/07
12/ 19/07
29.9*
2*. 64
29. »»
29.49
29.99
O.1O
O.39
M.7
97.4
M.4
49.2
9V.9
4.2
1O.00
9067
9091
9099
9049
9099
10
O.34
0.0479
O.0499
0.04*3
O.0771
0.0992
O.O147
1.72
0.144
0.072
O.077
0.107
0.100
0.039
33.16
29.96
14.26
14.66
19.39
19.96
7.91
97.30
17.61
16.40
16.01
17.20
17.04
O.91
3.OO
2979
3O17
3013
3022
3OO6
22
O.79
2.1O0
2.121
2.110
2.19O
2.119
O.OO9
0.43
4.46
4.47
4.47
4.49
4.46
0.01
O.2I
2/1/88
24
-------
NVNA NEAVY OUT! ftASOUNE IMCIHE COMEIATION PROGRAM DATA SMCfT
Aoml 2
45 FT. II. AT 2000 RPM STCADT STATE EMISSIONS DATA
(Aw*r*fe of three ram per lett)
Table 11
FACILITY
SMRI
DATE
TEST NO. NO/DT/W
BAROMETRIC SPECIFIC
ENGINE PRESSURE NUNIOITT
HOURS IN. HC. CMS/IS
MEAN
ST. OEV.
COVX
DILUTE
EIHAUST
VOLUME
SCF
:
til
4512
NO* K
FACTOR
1.01
1.01
MASS MASS MASS
HC CO NO*
MAMS* QRAMS* CRAMS*
69
4548
0.98
0.04
3.96
2.07
1.95
1.87
2.02
1.98
8.12
6.50
9.31
16.00
MASS FUEL INTE6.
C02 CONSUNP. POWER
GRAMS* LtS.
••••»
1181
11
7.04
9.82
SMRI
(Cell*!)
1
10/29/86
10/30/86
10/31/B
11/03/06
Hi AN
ST. OEV.
COVX
i
1.00
6.67
.
0.19
1.34
1.85
1.90
0.02
0.91
8.80
8:9l
8.95
I
1161
fis?
1.46
1.80
SMRI
(Ceilll)
1
11/21/86
11/22/86
3 11/25/86
4 11/26/86
5 12/01/86
MEAN
ST. OEV.
COVX
P
29.07
29!l7
29.20
0.16
0.55
ft!
sw
49.2
49.6
10.8
21.8
2965
2963
23
0.87
0.87
0.89
0.88
0.01
1.14
1.98
1.86
2.02
1.96
0.06
3.19
6.10
6.69
6.49
6.23
0.35
5.61
10.44
11.94
10.80
10.53
0.91
8.67
1174
1163
1161
1170
11
1
Oi.
8:?
°o:S1
1.02
1.24
1.24
1.24
1.24
0.01
0.72
SMRI
(CellM)
1 12/16/86
2 12/17/86
12/22/1
MAN
ST. DEV.
COVX
29.40
P
29.22
4851
4838
53.00
61.00 4838
m m
0.90
o.r
.89
10.31
10.93
M
0.
6.67
3.
ii
0.00
COVX - 100(ST. OEV./MEAN)
•GRAMS / 3 Minute*
05/21/67
Page 25
-------
NMM MCAVT DUTT GASOLINE ENGINE COME I Al ION PROGRAM DMA SNEEI
•ouid 2
49 FT. II. AT 2000 RPN STIADT STATE EMISSIONS DATA
(Av8F8t* of lhr*« runs p»r t««D
Table I la
DATE
f ACUITY TtST NO. HO/OT/TR
DILUTE
BAROMETRIC BKCmC EKNAUST
ENGINE PRESSURE RUMIDI1T VOLUME
HOURS IN. NC. CNS/LB Kf
M0» K
FACTOR
MASS
NC
MAMS*
MASS
CO
MAMS*
MASS
NO*
(WANS*
GMNS*
fUEl
00009.
IBS.
EPA
59 07/23/87
II 01 V.
ovt
.31 4213 1.00
:fl m 1:8
&!
4 4207,33 1.00
2.43
*:»
2.55
6.76
6.81
12.74
U:»1
12.41
1137
1133
INTEG.
POWER
FORD-DIN 1 05/01/87
2 05/05/87
1 05/07/87
4 05/08/87
MEAN
ST. OEV.
covt
156.40
168.20
176.4-"
182.4,
29.26
29.62
29.46
29.52
29.46
0.15
0.52
23.76
il-ft?
26) 10
26.33
5.27
20.01
5993
6079
6067
6145
SJi
• i!o3
0.81
0.80
0.84
0.81
0.81
2.33
1.68
1.65
1.88
1.82
1.76
0.11
6.25
6.63
6.30
6.92
6.67
6.63
0.25
3.82
10.27
8.69
9.51
9.24
9.15
0.42
4.55
1160
1102
1190
1123
1144
39.12
3.42
0.82
o!75
fcB
0.79
0.04
5.67
1.22
y*
1.23
8.00
.39
1.23
1.23
ONPC
17
08/21/87
28.
.92
2.64
6.54
12.79
m
1130
fit
1.25
MIAN
ST. DEV.
COVX
28.81
0
0
12
!42
57.79
4.86
8.41
5736.43
36.65
0.64
0.93
0.02
2.13
2.64
0.03
1.14
6.58
0.37
5.65
12.73
0.20
1.58
1135.33
5.51
0.49
0.85
0.00
0.33
1.26
0.01
1.12
• 100(ST, OfV./MEAN)
• CIUMS / 3 alnute*
09/22/87
CNMVSLEM
M16H.
ICHN
sr ocv
CVZ
12/17/97
12/17/07
12/17/87
12/19/07
29.98
29.69
29.69
29. 6O
O.tO
0.33
39
9.14
3O78 0.6918
3091 0.8971
3102 0.8921
0.8781
3083
18
0.6O
O.I
O.O129
2.39
2.2*
2.29
2.33
o!o«
1.79
9.63
6.67
7.2*
0.68
1O.H2
1O.10
9.96
10.66
9.98
1O.O8
0.49
4.90
1194
1199
1I7O
1182
1166
13
1.O8
0.817
0.82O
0.829
0.838
0.826
O.OO9
1.19
1.29
1.29
1.24
1.29
1.29
O.OO
0.40
2/1/88
Page 26
-------
Table 12
NVNA NEAVT OUTT AAROUNE ENGINE CORRELATION PROOIAN OAT* SHEET
ROM) 2
DYNAMOMETER RESPONSE TEST
PART I • tMINE CONNECTED
PART II • ENGINE DISCONNECT
PART III • ENGINE CONNECTED
ACUITY TEST NO.
TINE Of 8AR SPEC
DATE DAY PRES. HUN
ND/DY/YR 24 MRS IN/HO GNS/L8
MR I
C«ll«2>
1
RAN* TINE
UP DOWN
SEC. SEC.
.75
.75
.80
St THING TINE
UP DOWN
SEC. SCC.
RANP TINE SETTLING TINE OIST. AMP. OIST. RECOV. TINE Cf TO MOT MOT TO CT
UP OOMH UP DOMN CT MOT M01-C1 CT MOT MOT CT TINE TIME
SEC. SEC. SEC. SEC. RPN RPN SEC. SEC. SEC. SEC.
3.50
3.40
3.65
1.85
1.20
0.80
MEAN
St. DIV.
covk
3.
4.80
4.90
4.90
4.87
I
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.00
2.85
2.85
2.90
300
300
300
300
250
250
250
I:!? 8
3.50 2.90
3.10 1.00
3.20 2.60
l;!i 1:3
0.85
0.80
0.70
0.45
0.50
0.45
0.47
C«U«>
11/03/66
11/03/86
11/03/86
11:
lj:
13:
44
44
44
SJj
29.22
MEAN
ST. MV.
covt
0.00
NA 2.70 4.60 1.10 0.90
NA 2.70 4.65 *.« 5.90
NA 2.65 4.95 1.05 6.85
11
.20
•DIV/OI
•DIV/OI
•9IV/OI
4.n
0.19
4.00
1.03
f:8
0.90
1.35
1.40
1.50
1.42
0.06
5.39
2.
2.13
0.15
7.16
90
80
80
83
no roeovy*
no roeovy*'
no rocovy*
IDIV/OI IDIV/OI
IDIV/OI IDIV/OI
IDIV/OI MMV/OI
0.70
0.75
0.05
6.67
0.50
0.47
0.03
6.19
•jRI
C«U«1>
12/02/56
NEAR
SI. OEV.
am
24.
t.OO 1.1
!:» U
0.00
0.00
6.00
0.80
0.90
1.00
29.39
0.00
0.00
24.50 2.10
0.00 0.10
0.00 4.76
1.80
33 2.50 1.57
0.00 0.90
0.00 0.10
IDIV/OI ll.11
257
'1
170
Yo
1.«
1:1
i.
.27
1.00
1.10
0.85
0.82
0.06
7.07
MRI
CtH*9)
12/19/86
12/19/86
12/19/66
MEAN
ST.DEV
COVX
2.70 2.80
0:00 4^2
0.83
2.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0:00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
IDIV/OI IDIV/OI
160
T
0
160
no roeovy**
no rocovy**
160 IDIV/OI MIV/OI
M until throttle cloood.
4.35 1.22
09/17/87
OVX • 100(51. DfV./HfAH)
rowinrd 20BO to ?090 RPH until throttlt clos«l.
drt
Page 2*7
-------
Table K'.i
NVNA HEAVY OU1T OAK* INC ENGINE CORRELATION PROGRAN DAI* SHE {I
Round 2
DTNAMMEIER •ESPOUSE IEST
PMT 1 •
rACIUTV
(NlUord)
TINE Of MR
OAIE OAT PRES.
IfSr HO. NO/OT/TR 24 IMS IM/NG
1 oa/26/a7
MAM
ITD.DEV
COV*
SPEC MMP II*
MM UP
GNS/IR SEC.
f:ft
2.00
2. CO
0.00
0.00
MUM
SEC.
*:fl
5.io
2.1)
0.06
2.71
•MINE
CONNECTED PMT II • ENGINE DISCONNECT
tf THING1 TINE
UP
KC.
4.70
1.2
IB
1.49
DOWN
ICC.
*:B
4.50
in
A. 19
•AMP
UP
SEC.
2.10
2.10
2.10
fro!!
0.00
TINf
OOUH
SEC.
'1:8
1.90
0.82
S.15
SEIILINC IINE
UP
SEC.
a:*?
7.10
6.77
0.42
6.15
DOUN
SEC.
S:H
4.M
4.60
0.26
5.75
DIST.
CT UOT
•PN
I®
3.00
M
21.65
PMT III - ENGINE CONNECTED
AHP. DIST. «COV. TINE
yoT-ci
•PN
2:9
4.00
4.00
0.00
0.00
CT-UDT
SEC.
t:K
4.50
0;H
5.21
IOT-CT
SEC.
3:3
s.ao
18
1.51
CT TO UO!
IINE
SEC.
O.JO
N.A.
N.A.
O.JO
0IV/OI
mv/oi
HOT 10 CI
IINE
SEC.
1:®
1.20
1.21
0.06
4.6B
COVt • 100(11. OfV./NIAN)
09/17/87
CMBVSLEH
III8H.
1 12/18/87
2
3
ST OCV
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
O.O
O.O
2.5
2il
O. I
1.7
3.0
2.6
o'.f
27.1
3. I
3.0
2.9
3.0
O. I
3.3
i.e
i.e
i.e
i.e
0.0
0.0
I.O
O.9
I.O
I.O
O. I
6.O
2^5
2.5
2.3
O. I
2.3
2.0
2. I
2. I
2. I
O.I
2.B
50
SO
50
SO
O
0.0
IOO
1 00
IOO
IOO
O
O.O
5.1
5.O
3.1
9.3
O.2
1.1
1.3
. 2.9
3. 1
3-1
o.e
22. I
7.3
7.S
7.3
7.1
O. I
1. 6
O. 7
1.6
0.8
I.O
O.9
17.7
2/1/88
Page 20
-------
Table 13
KAVT WITT QASQUNE EMU
TMOITIE
PMT I - EMIHE
COBKIATIOB
TEST •
MTA
FACILITY
TIME Of
•ATE OAT
TEST NO.NQ/8r/TR 24 MS
BAR SICC. TOMUE 8ESP. TIM ACMtt
MESS. mm. UP ooui 98*
M/8G CHSA8 SEC. 8EC. FT.LM.
181
n.LM
PMT ii • EntiK
TED • OX TO 100K
TMT1C. 8UJ. TIME TOMUE 8ESP.
ooi? '®$'™*n
SEC. n.LM. fT.188.
TMOTTLE 8IM. TINi
•P 80M
SIC. 8EC.
iv/Qi
1:8
2.40
13.32
1.20
1.40
1.10
12.39
0.45
0.45
0.45
0.45
O.M
O.M
1.00
0.90
1.00
0.97
0.06
5.97
.54 29.M
85/12/87 i7:50 29^ 29:8
29.54 29.00
ST. KV. 8.08 0.00
OM 8.08 8.00
1.20
1.20
1.30
1.23
0.86
4.68
J:ffi
8.80
8.80
8.00
8.00
£7:
247.
0.88
238.M
2B.M
2B M
28.00
8*6?
0.08
8.78
1.80
TltS
m,
15.06
0.60
0.60
0.60
oioo
272.C
271^33
lov/oi
1.58
1.78
0.20
11.11
EPA
07/28/87 1S:00
ST. KV.
owl
1.13
1.20
1.20
1.18
6.04
3.43
1.29
1.35
1.28
1.28
0.08
5.98
O.M
2.S
26.M
26.M
O.M
O.M
0.62
0.83
5.59
8.39
8.48
8.45
8.44
8.05
10.41
1.95
1.51
0.39
25.93
1.50
1:3
1.31
0.19
14.20
265. M
265 .M
265 .M
26S.M
0.00
O.M
0.00
0.00
0.00
O.M
0 08
80IV/OI
2.10
1.71
1.71
1.84
0.2)
12.24
1.02
0*.90
0.98
0.07
7.07
COVX - 1M
10/28/87
trt
Page 29
-------
I ah 11- I J.i
MVMA HEAVY OU1V GASOLINE ENGINE CORRELATION PROGRAM OAtA SHEET
TNMTUE RESPONSE TEST 2000 RPN
PART I HMI*E CONNECTED - 10X TO 90X
PART II • ENGINE CONNECTED • OX TO 100X
TINE Of DAR SPEC.
OAIE DAT PRESS. HUN.
f»Clim TEIT NO.NO/DT/VR 24 HNS IH/HG ONI/18
ONTO 1.0 08/26/87
(Nil ford) 2.0
3.0
NEAR
Sl.OfV
COVX
TORQUE RE
UP
•EC.
$•*
5 9
6.4
4]l
SP. TINE
OOMN
(EC.
? *
2.4
2.4
2.4
0.0
0.0
90X
M.LM.
P'
I . 250
250
••}!*'
1.1
!OMUE"""""
10X
M.LBB
30
30
SO
30.0
0.0
0.0
TMRUE. SI
UP
•EC.
7.0
10.2
9.8
19i4
AS. IINE
DOUN
SEC.
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
0.0
0.0
TORQUE RE
UP
SFC.
j_j
2 9
2.7
2.9
0.3
8.6
SP. TINE
OOM
SEC.
2.8
2.5
2.6
2.6
0.2
5.8
ACTUAL '
1001
M.US.
255
255
255
255.0
0.0
0.0
TORQUE
OX
M.L8S.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
RVIV/OI
IHROTTLE S
UP
SEC.
3.2
3.1
3.0
3.1
TAi. TINE
OOUN
SEC.
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.1
5.6
COVX • 100(11. OEV./NEAN)
09/17/87
MRYSLER
i!8H
1
2
S
HERN
ST DEW
CVX
12X16/87
3.2
3.5
3.3
3.3
O. 1
3.O
2.7
3.O
2.7
2.8
0.2
6.2
27
29
25
26
1
1.5
238
238
238
238
O
O.O
3. t
3. I
3. I
3.1
O.O
O.O
1.7
1.6
1.7
1.7
O. 1
3.S
3.9
•«.O
3.5
3.8
O. 3
7.O
2.3
2.O
2. 1
2.1
O.2
7.2
261
261
261
261
O
O.O
O
O
O
O
O
O.O
8.3
8.4
O. 1
0.7
1.2
2.2
2. 1
1.8
O.6
30.0
2/1/88
Page 30
-------
laiue
NVNA HEAVY BUTT GASOLINE ENGINE CORRELATION PtOClUN DAI* MEET
Round 2
THROTTLE RESPONSE TEST
PART III - ENGINE CONNECTED
PART IV • ENGINE CONNECTED
FACILITY
SuRI
(C«tlff2)
•MRI
(C.I 1(0)
SMRI
%U
FORO-DBN
EPA
TEST NO.
1
MEAN
ST. DEV.
COVX
1
MEAN
ST. DfV.
covt
1
3
MEAN
ST. 06V.
COVX
1
2
MEAN
ST.DEV.
COVX
1
MEAN
ST. DEV.
COVX
••
MEAN
ST.OtV.
COVX
TIME OF
DATE DAY
NO/DY/YR 24 MRS
10/16/86
10/16/86
10/16/86
11/03/86 14:00
12/02/06
12/19/86
12/19/86
12/19/86
05/12/87 17:50
05/12/87 17:50
05/12/87 17:50
07/28/87 15:00
BAROMETRIC SPECIFIC
PRESSURE HUMID 1 IT
IN. HG. CHS/LI
P. 22 M
:8 Si
B:B 8
29.J9 25
29154 29
29,54 ?9iOO
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
..
IS THROTTLE OPEN? IS THROTTLE CLOSED?
AT 5 AT -5 Al 3 AT -3
NM. NM. NM. NM
V N N V
» N N Y
Y N H Y
T • N V
1 Y N V
• THY
Y Y Y Y
Y Y Y Y
Y Y Y Y
II N V V
N N Y Y
N N Y Y
V N H V
T N N Y
T H N V
Y Y N N
T Y N N
Y V II N
THROTTLE
DOUN
SEC.
1$
1.00
0.97
2.10
?"li
2i20
Oil?
5.41
0.90
8.93
.06
6.19
43!00
i|doj
V
16.20
7.41
2.61
35.21
OSC. TINE
UP
SEC.
0.70
0.70
0.65
?-*9
0.0}
4.22
1| '
1:3
li
5'.25
0.80
3:8
1$
&S
M
36.50
14.85
40.68
H»
2.85
1.27
44.66
THROTTLE OK. NAG.
DOWN UP
X UOT X UOT
3.00 4.00
OlOO 17.32
9.00 11.00
*:1B 11:81
8.33 11.00
10!00 7i50
5i97 9ll7
9.00 10.0
9.00 11.0
9.00 10.0
9.00 10.31
9.50 12.00
10 00 12 00
9^50 12.50
9.67 12.17
14.0 12.50
14.40 12.00
14.85 12.25
0.64 0.35
4.29 2.89
COVX => IOO(SI. DEV./MEAN)
HA Not Av«il«ble
lrl.2
09/17/87
Page 31
-------
Table
NVNA HEAVY DUTY GASOLINE ENGINE CORRELATION PROGRAM DATA SHEET
Hound 2
THROTTLE RESPONSE TEST
PART III • ENGINE CONNECTED
FAIT IV • ENGINE CONNECTED
MCILIIY
CNPfi
(Nil ford)
TEST NO.
1
]
MEAN
SI.DEV
covt
DATE
NO/DT/TR
8/26/87
8/26/87
8/26/87
TINE or
DAY
24 HRS
•ARONETRIC
PRESSURE
IN. HG.
SPECIFIC
HUMIDITY
GNS/18
'•
It THROTTLE OPEHT
AT 5 AT 5
HN. NN.
Y
Y
Y
Y
IS THROTTLE
Al J
NN.
N
N
N
CLOSED?
AT 3
NN.
N
N
N
THROTTLE OSC. TINE
DOUN UP
SEC. SEC.
6.2 6.80
7.2 6.50
4.8 7.00
6.1 6 8
193 J>
THROTTLE OSC. NAG.
OOUH UP
I MOT X WT
9 9
9 9
9 9
9 9
0 0
0 0
OOVt • 100(ST. OfV./MiAN)
•A • Hot Available
09/U/87
0«VSLEIt
HI6H. PfMK
I
2
3
HERN
ST OEV
CV*
V
V
Y
V
V
V
9.0
9.O
9.3
9.1
O.2
1.9
8.8
8.6
8.3
8.6
0.3
2.9
6.5
7.O
7.O
6.8
O. 3
8.9
8.0
8.0
e.z
0.3
3.S
2/1/88
Page 32
-------
Tnble 15
MVMR HERVY DUTY GRSOLINE ENGINE CORRELRTIDN PROGRftM DfiTfi SHEET
POWER MOP DOTH
*««•«»*««*»««»
FHCILITY
GM-MILFORD
5MRI
CCELL 2)
SURI
CCELL 3>
SMRI
CCELL 1)
SURI
CCELL 9>
FORO-DBN
EPO
CHRYSLER
HIGH. PRRK
COV?i = 100
TEST r
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
MERN
ST DES
COWi
* CST
40 DRTE
O9/ 12X86
OS/ 13/87
10/O7/86
1O/27/86
11/18X86
12/15/86
O5/O5/87
O7/O1/87
12/18/87
f
DEV/nEHN)
TIME HMB TEMP
0751 90.7
OO4t 71. •*
1527 79. O
15F12 73. 0
71. O
79. 0
1551 81.1
O81O 71.5
192O 79. O
78.3
5.5
7.O
BRRO (
IN H6
28.52
28.75
29.21
29.27
29. 07
29.36
29.19
29. lO
29.21
29. I
O.3
1.0
:URB IDLE
RPH
708
791
80O
801
eoo
805
800
8OO
eoo
79O. I
3O.9
3.9
KRH HP f
BMP
158.1
151.5
163.0
161. 0
155. O
168.O
161.2
162.7
16O.3
160.8
1.3
2.7
OTTED SPD Mf
RPM
3678
3596
10OO
3672
1OOO
3673
3197
3897
3500
3723.7
196. I
5.3
HK TRQUE
FT LBS
251.3
256.2
261.0
27O.O
263. 0
271.0
272. 9
272. O
268.8
265.8
7.9
3.0
SPEED
RPM
2295
2397
2300
2100
. 21OO
21OO
25O3
2115
2298
2318.7
117.1
5.0
MTC-722O
O1/29X88
Page 33
-------
MVMA HDGE CORRELATION PROGRAM
COMPOSITE EMISSIONS DATA
CL
I
CD
O
O
.1
1.04
1.07
SW 2
0.94
SW 3
0.88
0.85
XXX
1.05
/ 's
0.96
XX
SW 1
SW 9 FORD
LOCATION •
EPA
GMPG
• 0.99
CHRYS
Page 34
-------
MVMA HDGE CORRELATION PROGRAM
COMPOSITE EMISSIONS DATA
10
5 -
0.
u
5
o
a:
u
u.
L-
0
-1.0
-5 -
-10 -
u
O
a:
u
o_
o -15 -
-20 -
1.9
-10.5
-16.2
-8.6
-6.2
-19.0
-25
SW 2
SW 3
SW 1 SW 9
LOCATION
FORD
GMPG CHRYS
Page 35
-------
MVMA HDGE CORRELATION PROGRAM
COMPOSITE EMISSIONS DATA
40
0.
I
CD
O
o
o
35 4
31.72
30 4
25 4
20 4
15 4
10 H
5 4
30.94
SW 2
28.99
28.50
33.57
30.88
30.24
SW 3
SW 1
SW 9 FORD
LOCATION
EPA
28.16
GMPG CHRYS
Page 36
-------
CL
LJ
O
o:
u.
U.
u.
o
i-
LJ
O
£
LJ
Q.
O
O
12
10 -
a -
6 -
4 -
r\
0
-2 -
-4 -
-6 -
-8 -
-10 -
-12
MVMA HDGE CORRELATION PROGRAM
COMPOSITE EMISSIONS DATA
1
SW 2
0.2
SW 3
8.7
-6.1
-7.7
SW 1
1—
SW 9
LOCATION
1
FORD
-2.1
1
GMPG
-8.8
1
CHRYS
Page 37
-------
MVMA HDGE CORRELATION PROGRAM
COMPOSITE EMISSIONS DATA
0.
I
ft
\
2
O
x
O
z
8 -
7 -
6.21
6 -
4 -
3 -
1 -
0
6.30
5.96
6.08
6.16
SW 2 SW 3 SW 1
*l • ' '' • •*• •]'
SW 9 FORD
LOCATION .
6.53
7.18
6.96
EPA GMPG CHRYS
Page 38
-------
Q.
U
5
O
L.
L.
Q
h-
U
O
a:
u
Q.
X
O
z
12
10 -
8 -
6 -
4 -
2 -
0
-2 H
-4
-6 -
-8 -
-10 -
-12
MVMA HDGE CORRELATION PROGRAM
COMPOSITE EMISSIONS DATA
10.0
-4.9
SW 2
6.6
-3.5
-5.7
-6.9
-8.7
SW 3
SW 1 SW 9
LOCATION .
FORD
GMPG
CHRYS
Page 39
-------
-40-
Table of Hot Start Transient Emissions Data From EPA Testing
of the MVMA Round Robin Engine GM-350 HD
Test
No.
3654
3655
3657
3658
3661
3662
3665
3666
3668
3669
X
(s/x)100
% Difference
SWRI Cell ft 2
SWRI Cell tt3
SWRI Cell #1
SWRI Cell #9
FORD-DBN
GMPG/MVEL
CHRYS
Emissions, q/BHP-hr
HC
.91
.91
.92
.98
.95
1.07
1.14
1.11
1.00
1.00
1.00
8.31
Relative to
-1.9
8.1
-6.9
-15.9
-20.9
-7.9
-2.9
CO
29.90
29.60
30.40
29.80
29.57
29.55
29.26
30.30
30.99
30.06
29.94
1.71
EPA Data:
1.6
-.5
-6.0
-7.6
9.7
-1.0
-6.9
NOx
6.48
6.57
6.48
6.52
6.47
6.43
6.43
6.77
6.51
6.47
6.51
1.53
-4.8
-7.8
-3.5
-5.7
-4.3
10.5
7.6
BSFC
Ib/BHP-hr
.613
.625
.607
.601
.605
.602
.606
.621
.615
.603
.610
1.37
-.2
4. 1
4.3
-1.6
2.8
1.5
-.3
-------
-41-
Table of Cold Start Transient Emissions Data From
EPA Testing of the MVMA Round Robin Engine GM-350 HDG
Test
No.
3653
3656
3660
3664
3667
X
(s/x)100
% Difference
SWRI Cell #2
SWRI Cell #3
SWRI Cell #1
SWRI Cell #9
FORD-DBN
GMPG/MVEL
CHRYS
Emissions, q/BHP-hr
HC
1.35
1.40
1.42
1.65
1.63
1.49
9.36
Relative to
-12.8
-16.8
-18.8
-27.5
-19. 1
-15.9
-25.5
CO
34.02
34.77
34.37
35.47
35.34
34.79
1.78
EPA Data:
5.1
3.3
-2.7
-8.9
12.1
-2.5
-15.9
NOx
6.48
6.55
6.63
6.31
6.40
6.47
1.93
-7.9
-9.0
-4.2
-6.0
-5.2
10.2
8.2
BSFC
Ib/BHP-hr
.628
.627
.622
.621
.624
.624
.489
.8
4.2
4.5
-4.0
2.7
1.3
-1.3
-------
Attachment II
\ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN 48105
3 1987
OFFICE OF
AW AND RADIATION
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Phase II MVMA Round Robin Engine Testing for MOD/SEA
FROM: Thomas Baines, Engine Testing Programs Coordinator
Standards Development and Support Branch
TO: Charles L. Gray, Jr., Director
Emission Control Technology Divi
THRU: Chester J. France, Chief
Standards Development and "5uE*bojr"t Branch
4-
i
1. Introduction
The Selective Enforcement Audit (SEA) group of MOD has put
a very high priority on correlation data between manufacturer
SEA test cells and EPA-MVEL testing facilities. Thus, various
round robin testing programs are being performed. One of them
has been organized by MVMA and is designed to correlate EPA
with the HD gasoline SEA test cells at GM (Milford) and
Southwest Research Institute (Ford and Chrysler's SEA
contractor).
The first phase of this work correlated the test cells at
GM with those of the EPA MVEL. This engine was then shipped to
SwRl, but there it cracked a head and the engine had to be
replaced. Thus, in order to correlate the SwRl cells, this new
engine must be tested in our facility. (This does not really
represent an increase in our testing commitment to SEA, as the
original engine was scheduled for a re-test here.) This test
plan is for this testing effort.
2. Objective
Develop a set of emissions data on ah HD gasoline round
robin engine for comparison with other HDG test facilities.
-------
-2-
3. Project Scope of Work
Engine Description:
GM 350 CID
4 barrel carburetor
175 HP at 3750 RPM
275 ft Ib at 2500 RPM
Curb Idle = 700 RPM
Manual transmisison pneumatic clutch equipped)
Automatic choke
Fuel pressure — GM will supply
Make up oil — GM will supply
Engine back pressure — GM will supply
Work Description:
Map engine
One hot start transient — compare data
to hot start history
Natural cool (12 hr)
1 C/S, 2 H/S
Natural cool (12 hr)
1 C/S, 2 H/S
Natural cool (12 hr)
1 C/S, 2 H/S
Natural cool (12 hrO
1 C/S, 2 H/S
Variables to be Controlled:
Humidity — 50 grains/lb
Torque y-intercept — 0-5 ft Ib
Test Data Taken:
HC
CO
NOX
C02
Statistics
Power (reference, actual)
Fuel consumption
Actual
Carbon Balance
Barometer
Inlet air temperature (aircleaner inlet)
Oil sump temperature and fuel pump temperatures
to be recorded at 0, 300 and 900 seconds of
each test (CS & HS)
-------
-3-
Additional Data to be provided to MVMA:
Equipment survey
Fuel analysis
4. Output:
Data pack supplied to MOD/SEA and MVMA with cover memo.
5. Timing:
The engine should arrive about the end of December, 1986.
SEA has expressed their desire that it be tested as soon as
possible after arrival .
6. Level of Effort;
Technicians 180
Engineering 30
7. Safety information: See attached form.
8. Additional Comments
It is important to adjust the engine/dyno controller
system to achieve and torque y-intercept limits given above
because of the influence this has on HC levels and the need to
remove this influence from the correlation program.
9. Review/Approval
Review
t, vx
Date
Technicians?
Approval .
•» /.J7
Charles L. Gray, Jr. , ''x^-^ / T Date /- «C
, ^ <
f
Priority / . */
-------
-4-
Title: Phase II MVMA Round Robin
Engine Testing for MOD/SEA
Safety impact Assessment Form
For Engine Dyno Testing plans
The Engine Dyno Testing (EOT) facility has in place a set
of safety procedures that relate to general workplace safety
during the conduct of its normal work routine. However, the
performance of the work described in this work plan may involve
1) deviation from existing procedures of 2) work that is new
and thus there may be a need for new safety procedures to help
assure a hazard-free workplace. The purpose of this Safety
Impact Assessment Form is to provide a vehicle which 1) the
work plan author gives full consideration to the safety impact
of the work plan design, and 2) the safety procedures in the
engine dyno testing area are updated to reflect new work
requirements, and 3) the safety implications of the work plan
are fully communicated to the appropriate testing personnel and
all other affected parties.
1. Will performance of the work outlined require
deviation from established engine dyno testing group safety
procedures? No W" ; yes, the deviation(s) is (are) the
following:
The recommended changes to the established engine dyno testing
group safety procedures to accommodate these deviations yet
help assure a hazard-free workplace are the following:
2. Will performance of the work outlined in this work
plan involve hazards for which it would be appropriate to
develop new safety procedures?
For example, will there be any of the following:
^
Physical Hazards? No _ Yes, they are:
Chemical Hazards? No */" Yes, they are:
Fire Hazards? No •*" Yes, they are:
I/'
Other Hazards? No " Yes, they are
-------
3. Will any of the following be necessary?
Protective equipment (e.g. guards, etc.) No tX'Yes
the following:
Personal protective equipment (e.g., gloves, respirator,
filter, etc.) No iX Yes _ , the following:
4. Will any hazardous waste be generated? No *^
Yes , the following will be generated and the
disposal ofit will be:
5. Are there any other hazards to workplace safety and/or
worker health? No \^^ Yes ^_ , they are:
/'/ If*
Work
Date
The above information has been reviewed by me. I concur with
the safety procedure recommendations and I have therefore
implemented them. I also have communicated them to all the
persons that will be involved in the performance of this test
isor
Date
Technicians assigned to project
Date
Concur ranceXof Safety Officer
Date
------- |