71-21
Exhaust Emissions From a Rea.ctor Equipped,  Full-Sized
            *.Automobile Using LPG Fuel
                      March 1971
                   John C. Thomson
       Division of Emission Control Technology
       Mobile Source Pollution Control Program
             Air Pollution Control Office
           ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

-------
                                               71-21
Exhaust Emissions From a Reactor Equipped,  Full-Sized
              Automobile Using LPG Fuel
                      March 1971
                   John C.  Thomson
       Division of Emission Control Technology
       Mobile Source Pollution Control Program
             Air Pollution Control Office
           ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

-------
Vehicle Tested

A specially equipped 1971 Oldsmobile Delta 88 was supplied
by General Motors for evaluation by APCO.  This vehicle
was. to have very low exhaust emissions, approaching the
1975 levels.  A Century LPG Conversion Kit was used with
modifications made to provide low emissions.  In addition,
a reactor, exhaust gas recycle and a pulse air injection
system were supplied.  All vehicle tests were made using
the fuel supplied by GM and no attempt was made to analyze
the fuel composition.

Tests Conducted

The following tests were performed on the vehicle:

    1.  Standard 1970 Federal test procedure for
    exhaust emissions (FTP).

    2.  Closed, constant volume sampling technique
    using nine repeats of the Federal emissions
    test cycle (9x7).

    3.  Closed, constant volume sampling technique
    using the LA4-S4 driving schedule as developed
    for 1972 and later new vehicle certification
    (LA4).

Bag samples taken during closed cycle tests were analyzed
using non-dispersive infrared analysis (IR) for carbon
monoxide and carbon dioxide, flame ionization detection
(FID)  was used for hydrocarbon analysis.  In order to com-
pare oxides of nitrogen measurements with data taken on
other vehicles, a variety of techniques were used.  A
modified Saltzman (Saltz) technique was used for wet chemi-
cal analysis, a chemiluminescent technique (CD, and an
electrochemical (ENVTS)  technique were also used.  All
results are reported as N02 and have been corrected for
humidity using the following:

                           NO2 measured

               NO2 corr = 	
                          1-0.0047  (H-75)

where H is the humidity in grains of water.

When open cycle tests were run, non-dispersive infrared
oxides of nitrogen data were taken.

-------
                          -2-

Emission Results

All of the data taken during the test period can be found
in Tables 1 and 2.  After the first test shown in Table 1,
the carburetor was adjusted to improve driveability.  The
hydrocarbon values were consistantly higher than the pro-
posed 1975 standards of 0.46 gpm while carbon monoxide was
lower than the standard of 4.7 gpm except on the last test.
No standard for oxides of nitrogen has been adopted, how-
ever, the values shown on these tests are very low.  The
hydrocarbon values would probably be reduced if a density
for hydrocarbon in the exhaust had been determined and used
in place of the standard density for gasoline.  The results
fell in the low ranges of the instruments used and the exact
numbers may be questionable, although repeatability was good.
Background hydrocarbon levels were quite high on some tests
and may have influenced levels also.

Conclusions

The vehicle showed low emission levels.  There were no
attempts to measure driveability except for acceleration
runs.

-------
                         Table 1
Date

2/09
2/11
2/16

2/12
HC
(FID)

1.0
1.0
0.6

0.6
CO
(NDIR)
LA4-S4
1.3
2.9
5.0

1.4
CC-2
(NDIR)
NOX
(Saltz)
Test Results (gpm)
984
952
981
9x7 Test
905
0.3
0.4
0.4
Results
0.6
NOX
(CD
*
0.4
0.4
0.1

0.2
NOX
(ENVTS)

0.6
0.8
	

0.6
* Results obtained using HC density of 16.33 and no
  correction for reactivity or fuel composition.  The
  effect of density correction would be less than 10%.

-------
              TABLE 2


 1970 Federal Test Procedure (FTP)*
Cycle
1
2
3
4
6
7
Composite
HC
gpm
280
61
44
36
45
40
.93 gpm
CO
0.08
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.01
.61 gpm
NO
PPM
92
100
106
100
100
102
. 45 gpm
* Results obtained using standard
method with no correction for fuel
type, reactivity or instrument re-
sponse.

-------