72-13
EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM THE LAFORCE FALCON
              December 1971
            Thomas C. Austin
      Test and Evaluation Branch
Division of Emission Control Technology
Mobile Source Pollution Control Program
    Environmental Protection Agency

-------
Background

The exhaust emission characteristics of a 1967 Ford .Falcon
extensively modified by Mr. Robert LaForce of Beaver,
Pennsylvania, were previously evaluated using the 7-mode
test cycle at EPA's old Willow Run Laboratory.  Several
modifications were made to the system after that test.
The LaForce vehicle was scheduled for additional evaluation
using the 1975 test procedure to determine if the latest
configuration could approach emission levels required for
1975 and 1976.

Vehicle Tested

The LaForce system consisted of numerous modifications to
a 1967 Ford Falcon.  The basic power train was a 200 cubic
inch six coupled to an automatic transmission.

The production carburetor had been replaced by an extensively
modified Holley two barrel.  The carburetor utilized two
different air inlets.  The primary inlet passed air through
the venturi's where it was mixed with fuel.  A second inlet
on the back of the carburetor by-passed the venturi's and did
not mix any fuel with the air.  'The second inlet was used
during deceleration to eliminate the high unburned hydrocarbon
levels which occur during high manifold vacuum conditions on
uncontrolled vehicles.  To further reduce hydrocarbon emissions
the accelerator pump cam was modified to reduce the pump shot
to the minimum the engine "required.  The carburetor's power
valve was also modified.  Air velocity in the primary inlet
was measured and the power valve would not fully open until
a predetermined velocity xvas reached.

The carburetor's float bowl had overflow ports on each side
to drain fuel back to the tank on cornering.  The bowl was
also equipped with a drain that allowed fuel to be pumped
from the bowl back to the tank after the engine was shut-off
to reduce evaporative emissions.

The exhaust manifold had been insulated.  Air was pumped into
an air space between the manifold and the insulation where it
was preheated before being injected into the exhaust ports to
induce further oxidation of pollutants which were not completely
burned in the cylinder.  At the exit of the exhaust manifold
was a venturi.  Exhaust gases flowing through the venturi caused
more air from the preheater to be drawn into the exhaust.

-------
                             -2-
 Modifications  had  also  been made to provide for increased
 spark  advance  during  start  up in an effort to reduce the
.high hydrocarbon  levels that occur when a vehicle is cold
 started.
 The  camshaft  had  been retarded 6°  to  increase  the  exhaust
 gas  dilution  of

 Tests  Conducted
gas dilution of the next charge.
 The  1972  Federal  Test  Procedure  was  used to compare the
 emissions  from the  LaForce  car to the 1972, 1973,  and 1974
 Federal Standards.   This  test involves starting the vehicle
 after  it  has  been parked  in a 68-86°F ambient for  at least
 12 hours  and  operating it on a chassis dynamometer for a
 simulated   7.5 mile urban drive.   Vehicle exhaust  is diluted
 to a constant volume and  a  portion of the dilute exhaust is
 collected  continuously throughout the 23 mile test in a Tedlar
 (inert plastic)  sample bag.   The  concentrations of pollutants
 in the sample bag are  then  measured.   A flame ionization
 detector  (FID) is used to determine  unburned hydrocarbon (HC)
 concentration.  Non-dispersive infrared (NDIR)  analyzers are
 used for  carbon monoxide  (CO) and carbon dioxide (C02).  A
 chemiluminescent  (CL)  analyzer is used to determine nitric
 oxide  (NO)  concentration.   Nitrogen  dioxide (N02)  concentration
 was  not measured as the N02  converter was not operational
 during the  test.  Had  the N02 converter been operational the
 NOx  values  would  have  been  slightly  higher.  Emission results
 are  reported  as grams  per mile.

 The  1975  Federal  Test  Procedure  was  used to show how the
 LaForce car compares to the 1975  and 1976 Federal  Standards.
 The  1975  pro.cedure  is  similar to  .the 1972. procedure except
 that a portion of the  dilute exhaust is pumped into three
 different  sample  bags. The first bag is filled during
 the  first  3.6 miles of the  7.5 mile  cycle,  the second bag during
 the  last  3.9  miles  and the  third  bag during the first 3.6 miles
 after  a 10  minute shut down.  The pollutant concentrations
 are  read  with the same instrumentation used for the 1972 pro-
 cedure.   Mass emissions in  grams  per mile of vehicle operation
 are  calculated after weighting factors are  applied to the cold
 and  hot start bags.

 Test Results

 Test results  are  summarized in Table I.  The first part of
 Table  1 compares  the test run using  the 1972 procedure to
 the  1972,  1973, and 1974  Federal  Emission Standards.  The
 LaForce vehicle produced  lower emission levels than required
 by the 1972 Federal Standards.

-------
                          -3-
The second part of Table I compares the data using the 1975
Federal Test Procedure to the 1975 and 1976 Federal Standards
Emission levels from the LaForce car were more, than five
times higher than required.

Summary and Conclusions

The modifications made to the vehicle enabled a previously
uncontrolled, car to meet emission levels required by the
1972 Federal exhaust emission standards.  The modifications
made were much more complex and extensive than required to
obtain the emission levels produced.  Many features of the
system were apparently ineffective.  The emission levels were
far above the 1975 and 1976 requirements and the system
was too complicated to be considered as a retrofit package
for uncontrolled vehicles.

-------
                         Table I
                  EMISSION TEST RESULTS
              (All Data in Grams Per Mile)
               1972 Federal Test Procedure
Pollutant
HC
CO
NOx

Pollutant
HC
CO
NOx-
LaForce
Falcon
2.28
38.5
2.71*
1975 Federal Test
LaForce
Falcon
1.73
22.25
2 . 96-
1972 Federal
Standards
3.4
39.0
	
Procedure
1975 Federal
Standards
.41
3.40
3.0
1973-74 Fed.
Standards
3.4
39.0
3.0

1976 Federal
Standards
.41
3.40
.40
*NO only, N02 not measured.

-------