72-16
    EVALUATION OF STA-POWER
         FUEL ADDITIVE
         February 1972
        Henry L. Gompf
  Test and Evaluation Branch
Environmental Protection Agency

-------
Background

Sta-Power fuel additive is being marketed as an emission
reduction compound when mixed in the specified proportions
with gasoline.  While it is assumed that its intended
effect is a detergent one, it was desired to determine
whether there vias an immediate effect on emissions.  An
immediate effect would indicate that Sta-Power effects the
chemical properties of the fuel or the reactions in the
combustion process.  No attempt to measure the results of
its detergent action was made.  The extent of any reduction
of emissions with long term use of Sta-Power would be de-
pendent on the condition of carburetor and engine parts.


Control Technique

Sta-Power is a petroleum based product marketed by the
Sta-Power Company of San Rafael, California.  It is added
to the fuel tank at a-rate of one ounce of Sta-Power per
gallon of gasoline.
Test Program

A 1970 Plymouth Valiant with a 225 CID six cylinder engine
was used for the emission testing.  The car was operated
on the chassis dynamometer at 50 miles per hour to allow
the engine to reach normal operating temperatures.  Baseline
7-mode cycles (as used for the 1968 Federal Emission Test
Procedures) were run using Indolene 30 test fuel.  At com-
pletion of the baseline cycles the vehicle was_allowed to
run out of fuel.  The vehicle was then run several minutes"
using a mixture of Indolene 30 and Sta-Power.  Two more
7-mode cycles were run followed by fuel runout.  Finally
two more cycles were run with pure Indolene 30.

For the baseline and additive tests, continuous emission
measuring was used.  Emission values were calculated accord-
ing to the 1968 Federal Emission Test Procedure.  NDIR
instrumentation was used to measure hydrocarbon, carbon
monoxide,, carbon dioxode, and nitric oxide emissions from
the" vehicle tailpipe.  A hot start test was employed to
eliminate cold start variability which might have masked
any additive effect.  Continuous tailpipe analysis enabled
comparison of the additive's e.ffect on each engine operating
mode.

-------
Results
The modal analysis data is presented  in the Appendix.   The
effect on Sta-Power is summarized  in  the  following  table:
           ffect of Sta-Power  from Baseline
Mode
Idle

0-25 Accel

30 Cruise

30-15 Decel

15 Cruise

15-30 Cruise

50-20 Decel
   HC

no effect

no effect
   CO

no effect

slight red.
slight inc.   slight -inc.

no 'effect    .no  effect

no  effect

no effect
slight red.
slight inc.

no effect

no effect
   NO

no effect

no effect

slight red.

slight red.

reduction

slight inc.

no effect
                   Hot  7-mode Cycles
                  Weighted  £ Averaged

                                                  NO

                                              1425.2  ppm

                                              1447.5  ppm


As can be seen, no significant  effect  on  Sta-Power was measured


Conclusions

Baseline
Sta-Power
HC_
13 3. -7 ppm
132.8 ppm
CO
.57%
.57%
Sta-Power has no immediate  chemical  or  combustion  effect
which results in an emission  reduction.   No  evaluation  of
long term detergent  effect  was  made.

-------
                APPENDIX




MODE-BY-MODE STA-POWER ADDITIVE ANALYSIS


IDLE




0-




30




30




HC
CO
co2
NO
25 ACCEL
HC
CO
co2
NO
CRUISE
HC
CO
C°2
NO
-15 DECEL
NO
CO
CO 2
NO
Pre-Baseline
Average
118.7 ppm
1.89%
12.46%
4 . 5 ppm
124.6 ppm
.51%
13.09%
1320.9 ppm
102.3 ppm
.16%
13. 36%
1302.4 ppm
99. 7 ppm
1.59%
12.85%
250.3 ppm
St a- Power
. Avefage
113.4 ppm
1.72%
12.63%
4 . 5 ppm
118.9 ppm
.38%
13.14%
1427.1 ppm
108.4 ppm
.19%
13.85%
944.9 ppm
95 . 7 ppm
1. 53%
12. 86%
221.4 ppm
Post-Baseline
Average
109.1 ppm
1.59%
12.66%
4. 5 ppm
116.1 ppm
.42%
13.15%
1528.5 ppm
97.3 ppm
.12%
13.51%
1196. 5 ppm
87.8 ppm
1.26%
13.061
264. 8 ppm

-------
Pre-Baseline
Average
15 CRUISE
HC
CO
CO 2
NO
15-30 ACCEL
HC
CO
co2
NO
50-20 DECEL
HC
CO
CO.

132
1
12
11

123

13
1808

419
1
12

.8

ppm
.47%
.95
. 3

.8
.34
%
ppm

ppm
%
.14%
.5

.1
. 78
.-85
ppm

ppm.
%
%- ..
Sta-Po\\'er
Average

120.
1.
12.
6.

120.
•
13.
1918.

408.
1.
12.

2
50
79
1

0
28

ppm
%
%
ppm

ppm
%
28%
8

4
72
95
ppm

ppm
%
%
Post-Baseline
Average

116.
1.
13.
39.

115.
•
13.
1737.

481.
1.
12.

5
21
17
5

5
23
29
8

8
46
80

ppm
%
%
ppm

ppm
%
%
ppm

ppm
o,
0
%
         MO    379.0 ppm






CYCLES WEIGHTED $ AVERAGED



         HC    137.0 ppm



         CO       .64%




         CO 2



         NO   1425.3 ppm
 373.7 ppm










 132.8 ppm



    .57%"








1447.5 ppm
 322.9 ppm










 130.3 ppm



    .50%








1425.0 ppm

-------