fi-EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Motor Vehicle Emission Lab
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
Correlation
Program Report
TAEB 79-6
January 1979
1978 EPA-PEUGEOT LIGHT DUTY DIESEL CORRELATION PROGRAM
-------
79-6
1978 EPA-Peugeot Light Duty Diesel Correlation Program
Technology Assessment and Evaluation Branch
U.S. Environmental Protecion Agency
Motor Vehicle Emission Laboratory
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
January, 1979
-------
1. Foreward
In March 1978, a request for a specific correlation program between
the EPA laboratory and Peugeot Automobiles of France was discussed
and accepted. The purpose of the program was to investigate the
difference in Hydrocarbon emissions measured on Diesel vehicles at
the EPA and Peugeot. The possiblity of the offset being fuel
related was of primary concern to Peugeot and the program was
designed to explore this. Testing is still being done on the
vehicle and this report presents and discusses data collected thru
December 1978.
2. Sunnnmary
The following observations can be made from this correlation
program:
* There was a definite offset at all participating laboratories
in HC-HFID emission measurements between the test fuel normally
used by EPA (supplied by AMOCO) and a test fuel with higher
Cetane Number (supplied by Howell Hydrocarbons). Both fuels
met Federal Register specifications. This offset was approxi-
mately 38% for the hot LA-4 cycle and 46% for the 25 mph
steady state tests. The AMOCO fuel produced higher emissions.
* A lab to lab difference of about 35% (EPA higher) exists
between the EPA and many other laboratories in measuring HC-
HFID emissions on the same fuel. This lab to lab offset was
also exhibited in the 1977 EPA-Industry LDD correlation program
(report CORR 7801-RL) in which Peugeot participated. Southwest
Research Institute, who also participated in the Peugeot
program, did a follow-up study of this offset between their
lab and EPA. By bringing their equipment to EPA, they were
able to diagnose and correct most of the difference. The SwRI
summary of the corrective actions taken is included in Appendix 3.
* Peugeot's contention that Cetane Number is the best variable
in determining fuel quality can not be conclusively proven by
this program. The two fuels used were different in composition
as well as Cetane Number. A base fuel and the base fuel with
an additive to increase Cetane Number are recommended for
future work if Cetane Number is to be studied. Also, the
previous EPA-Industry correlation (in which EPA used another
low Cetane fuel) showed no such offset due to fuel differences.
-------
* Lab to lab and fuel to fuel variability in CO emissions
in this program as compared to the EPA-Industry program (in
which a Mercedes and a GM vehicle were used) seem to indicate
that CO emissions from the Peugeot vehicle used here were more
sensitive to fuel differences than the other diesel vehicles.
3. Technical discussion
3.1 Program Objective
This program was designed to investigate the possibility that
the offset in Diesel Hydrocarbon emissions measured at the EPA
and Peugeot laboratories was fuel related. EPA has measured
HC two to three times higher than the Peugeot laboratories.
Peugeot contends that the EPA fuel has a Cetane Number lower
than Peugeot's test fuel and that this difference causes
markedly higher Hydrocarbon emissions at EPA.
3.2 Program Design
The test program was designed to produce stable emissions at
all test sites. Two fuels were used: A) EPA's normal Diesel
#2 test fuel (supplied by AMOCO) and B) A Diesel #2 test fuel
specified by Peugeot (supplied by Howell Hydrocarbons). Two
test procedures were run with each fuel giving a total of two
hot start LA-4 cycles and two 25 m.p.h. steady state tests per
fuel at each lab. The test sequence used at all sites is
given in Table 1.
3.3 Facilities and Equipment
3.3.1 Test sites
The following laboratories have participated in this
correlation program:
Peugeot - Belchamp (April 21 & 22, 1978)
Mercedes Benz (May 31 & June 1, 1978)
Volkswagen (June 6 & 7, 1978)
Ricardo (June 13 & 14, 1978)
Peugeot - Paris (June 19, 1978)
EPA (July 1 & 2, 1978)
C.A.R.B. (September 13 & 14, 1978)
Southwest Res. Inst. (October 24, 1978)
GM (January, 1979)
All test equipment at each laboratory met Federal
Register specifications.
-------
Table 1
1978 Peugeot Diesel Correlation Test Sequence
1. Drain fuel.
2. Fill tank with Fuel A.
3. Precondition - 1 LA-4 cycle.
4. Engine off for 10 minutes.
5. Perform a hot start LA-4 cycle (emission samples taken - 2 bags).
6. Perform coast downs (time from 55-45 and 55-20 mph, repeat once).
7. Engine off for 15 minutes.
8. Perform steady state test, 25 mph for 15 minutes. (Emission samples
taken, 2 bags last 10 minutes)
9. Repeat steps 3,4,5,7,8 once.
10. Drain fuel.
11. Refill with Fuel B.
12. Repeat steps 3,4,5,7,8 twice.
-------
3.3.2 Test Vehicle
One vehicle was used for all testing done in this
program. The vehicle was a 1978 Peugeot 504 Sedan
Diesel. The car was instrumented with thermocouples in
the engine & exhaust, which were connected to a recorder,
and a drive-shaft torque-meter. The vehicle was not
modified in any other way.
4. Test Results
The Hot Start LA-4 cycle tests are summarized in Table 2. The
steady state results are summarized in Table 3. Individual test
results at each lab are given in appendices 1 (Hot Tests) and 2
(Cruise 25). All labs followed the test sequence with the exception
of Peugeot-Paris, which ran only 1 test per fuel. Southwest Research
ran three HC analyzers on the exhaust samples. All data presented
from Southwest in this report appear in triplicate. Only the HC
measurements are different. Individual test data from C.A.R.B. and
GM are not included because.the data could not be provided to EPA
prior to the completion of this report.
Fuel analyses were performed by Ethyl Corporation on the test
fuels. The results are given in Table 4 and a graph of the distillation
curves of the fuels is given in Figure 1.
5. Data Discussion
5.1 HC Emissions
Hydrocarbons were the main concern of this program. Previous
HFID data has shown as much as a 100% discrepancy between
Peugeot and EPA measurements. This is a long-standing problem
which has appeared in the 1978 certification tests on the
Peugeot vehicle and in the EPA-Industry Diesel Correlation
Program of 1977. (EPA Report - CORR 7801-RL).
The test data from this program shows that there is a signi-
ficant difference in the HFID emissions between the two fuels.
Looking at the difference in each lab shows an average offset
of 38% (Fuel A higher) for the Hot LA-4 tests. Similarly, an
offset of 46% was calculated for the steady state tests.
On the same fuel, there was a significant offset between the
EPA lab and the other participants. EPA measured the highest
HFID emissions for both test procedures on both fuels. These
results are shown in Figure 2. This difference was also seen
in previous programs with these labs. GM data is expected to
agree with EPA based on previous results. Their data was not
received in time for this report.
-------
LA8
EPA
(AMOCO FUEL)
EPA
(HOWELL FUEL)
PEUGEOT-8ELCHAMP
(AMOCO FUEL)
PEUGEOT-8ELCHAMP
(HOWELL FUEL)
PEUGEOT-PARIS
(AMOCO FUllL)
PEUGEOT-PARIS
(HOWELL FUEL)
MERCEDES 8ENZ
(AMOCO FUEL)
MERCEDES 8ENZ
(HOWELL FUEL)
VOLKSWAGEN
(AMOCO FUEL)
VOLKSWAGEN
(HOWELL FUEL)
(AMOCO FUEL)
RICAROO
(HOWELL FUEL)
SOUTHWEST RES INST
(AMOCO FUEL)
(SWRI ANALYZER)
SOUTHWEST RES INST
(HOWELL FUEL)
(SWRI ANALYZER)
SOUTHWEST RES INST
(AMOCO FUEL)
(BECKMANOIO. 2)
SOUTHWHST PES IMST
(HOWELL FUEL)
(BEOCMAN SO. 2)
SOUTHWEST PES INST
(AMO'O FUEL)
(BECKHAN NO. 3)
SOUTHW-ST «ES "''ST
(HOWELL FUEL)
(BEOCMAN NO. 3)
N
2
Z
Z
Z
1
1
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
2
Z
Z
1
2
MEAN
STANDARD
C.V. 4
MEAN
STANDARD
C.V.I
MEAN
STANDARD
c.v.%
MEAN
STANDARD
C.V.t
MEAN
STANDARD
C.V.t
MEAN
STANDARD
C.V.t
MEAN
STANDARD
C.V.t
MEAN
STANDARD
C.V.t
MEAN
STANDARD
C.V.t
MEAN
STANDARD
c.v.t
STANDARD
C.V.t
MEAN
STANO-RO
C.V.t
MEAN
STANDuRO
C.V.%
MEAN
STAND'-OO
C.V.SS
MEAN
STANOcOO
C.V.*
ME, IN
STAND-RO
C.V.*
"EAN
STANO-00
C . V . t
STAND- PO
C . v . *
HFID
CO
NOX
C02
FE
8ARO
HUM
N*FC OBL HSL TLflSS
l< G/MI- >| (MPG) (IN-HG) (GRAINS X (QRAMSl >l
/LB)
0.610 1.60 1.16 352. 28.6 29.08 71.49 0.98
OEV. .n990 0.141 .028 6. 0.4 0.0 4.568 .021
16.2 8.8 2.4 1.6 1.2 0.0 6.39 2.12
0.375
OEV, .0071
1.9
0.362
DEV. .0170
4.7
0.255
OEV. .0141
5.5
0.450
OEV. .0
0.0
0.273
OEV. .0
0.0
0.465
OEV. .0071
1.5
0.204
OEV. .0651
31.9
0.425
OEV. .0919
21.6
0.230
OEV. ,Ul4l
(S.I
OEV. .0276
6.4
0.277
OEV. .0163
5.9
0.420
DEV. .0
0.0
0.295
OEV. .0364
12.0
) -) sOf.
*~ VI £-J V
0.460
OEV. .0424
9.2
- i- to%
0.300
OEV. .04,54
U.I
OEV. .0
0.0
0.340
OEV. .u2-U
*. J
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
)
0
0
0
1
0
o
1.20
.001
0.1
1.25
.122
9.8
1.03
.006
0.5
2.12
.0
0.0
1.76
.0
0.0
1.35
.078
5.7
0.96
.023
2.9
1.61
.099
6.1
1.23
.120
9.7
.127
9.2
1.02
.053
5.2
1.57
.021
1.3
1.24
.064
5.1
1.57
.021
1.24
.064
5.1
1.59
.0
u.O
1.24
'-i.l
1.14
.007
0.6
1.08
.014
1.1
1.13
.007
0.6
0.98
.0
0.0
1.00
.0
0.0
0.97
.021
2.2
1.00
.014
1.4
1.02
.035
3.4
1.09
.035
3.3
.042
4.0
1.09
.028
2.*
0.95
.014
l.T
0.97
.040
S.I
U.95
.014
0.97
.044
5.1
0.9*.
.0
0.0
'j . i ">
i.l
341.
2.
0.6
308.
8.
2.5
34S.
10.
2.9
347.
0.
0.0
354.
0.
0.0
330.
1.
0.4
337.
5.
1.5
365.
4.
1.0
362.
12.
3.3
4.
1.0
353.
6.
1.8
376.
4.
1.1
367.
6.
1.5
376.
4.
367.
6.
1.5
373.
0.
0.0
367.
6.
1.5
29.6
0.1
0.5
32.9
0.8
2.6
29.4
0.8
2.9
29.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
30.6
0.1
0.5
30.2
0.4
1.4
27.8
0.4
1.3
28.0
0.9
3.3
0.4
1.2
28.8
0.5
1.7
26.3
0.3
1.1
27.5
0.4
1.5
26. a
0.3
27.5
0.4
1.5
27.0
0.0
0.0
27.5
0.4
1.5
29.06
0.0
0.0
30.07
0.0
0.0
30.19
0.019
0.06
28.93
0.0
0.0
28.93
0.0
0.0
29.27
0.027
0.09
29.15
0.027
0.09
29.78
0.084
0.28
29.37
0.495
1.68
0.016
0.05
30.22
0.016
0.05
29.27
0.0
0.0
29.25
0.0
0.0
29.27
0.0
29.25
o.o
0.0
29.26
o.o
0.0
29. 2i
0.;)
0.0
74.83
2.382
3.18
36.87
0.417
1.13
53.96
0.728
1.35
62.62
0.0
0.0
57.50
0.0
0.0
58.99
0.0
0.0
53.80
3.458
6.43
59.47
1.386
2.33
62.85
1.343
2.14
6.541
12.14
48.96
2.277
4.65
52.49
2.008
3.83
62.11
3.344
5.38
52.49
2.008
3.83
52.11
3.344
5.38
53.91
0.0
0.0
62.11
3.344
5.38
1.00
.011
1.12
0.85
.002
0.22
0.91
.003
0.31
0.94
.0
0.0
0.92
. 0
0.0
0.93
.0
0.0
0.91
.013
1.48
0.93
.006
0.62
0.95
.006
0.61
.U25
2.80
0.89
..109
0.06
0,90
.008
O.aS
0.94
.014
1.48
0.90
.on8
0.85
0.94
. L. 14
1.4B
0.91
o'.o
0.54
l.us
C.V.* IS THE C:JEFFIC!EMT OF VARIATION. (STD. Ufcv./ 'Ef.r-j »!00).
JIFF.* IS THE HFFERENCE r'f T"£ "E-NS BETWEEN TH,-: IF- iND i=i LASS. (VF«-£V4/EPA »1001
-------
TABLE 3.
uAS CORRELATION SUMMARY
PROCESSED: JAN u, 1979
PEUGfOT CORR. CR2S Vlw 2o77b01
LAB
EPA
(AMOCO FUEL)
EPA
(HOWELL FUEL)
PEUGEOT-8ELCHAMP
(AMOCO FUEL)
PEUGEOT-8ELCHAMP
(HOWF.LL FUEL)
PEUGEOT-PARIS
(AMOCO FUEL)
MERCEDES 8ENZ
(AMOCO FUEL)
MERCEDES 8ENZ
(HOWELL FUEL).
VOLKSWAGEN
(AMOCO FUEL)
VOLKSWAGEN
(HOWELL FUEL)
RICAROO
(AMOCO FUEL)
WtCAHOO--
(HOWELL FUEL)
SOUTHWEST RES INST
(AMOCO FUEL)
(SWRI ANALYZER)
SOUT-wEST RES INST
(HOWELL FUEL)
(StfRI ANALYZER)
SOUTuwtCST SES INST
(AMOCO FUEL)
(BECKMAN NO. 2)
SOUTHWEST WES INST
(HOWELL FUEL)
(BECKMAN NO. 2)
SOUT-.w-:sT -SES i^'ST
(AMOCO FUEL)
(BECKMAN NO. 3)
SOUT-w-ST J'TS :'P<5T
(HOWFL1. FUEL)
(BECKMAN NO. 3)
N
4
4
3
4
2
2
2
4
4
4
ft
3
4
3
4
!
"
MEAN
STAND- RD DEV.
C.V.%
MEAN
STANDARD DEV.
C.V.%
MEAN
STANDARD 1EV.
C.V.%
MEAN
STANDARD OEV.
C.V.%
MEAN
STANDARD OEV.
C.V.%
MEAN
STANDARD OEV.
C.V.%
MEAN
STANDARD OEV.
C.V.%
MEAN
STANDARD DV.
C.V.%
MEAN
STANDARD OEV.
c.v.%
MEAN
STANDARD n£V.
C.V.%
STANO-PD OEV.
C.V.%
MEAN
STANDARD DEV.
C.V.%
MEAN
STANOaSO OEV.
C.V.I
M£AN
STANDARD OEV.
C . V . t
STANDARD '"1EV.
c.v.%
STAND. 00 lEV.
C.v.%
iTlNU-'O ")EV.
C.v. *
HFID
CO
NOX
C02
I < ... _U/MI > i
0.313 1.01 0.8] 194.
.0600 0.120 .015 5.
19.2 11.9 1.4 2.5
0.161
.0092
5.7
0.190
.0179
9.4
0.116
.0090
7.7
0.221
.0106
4.8
0.210
.0141
6.7
0.074
.0120
16.1
0.138
.1.030
4.3
0.069
.0079
0.163
.009a
6.0
O-.-ffS"
.0150
13.1
0.127
.U211
18.2
O.OH2
11.6
0.117
.0231
19. d
0.060
13. S
0.147
'is. 7
0.0*17
. J126
0.49
0.052
10.7
0.76
0.040
5.2
0.63
0.012
1.3
1.33
0.001
0.1
0.94
0.014
1.5
0.43
0.024
5.6
1.08
0.031
2.3
0.53
0.022
0.78
0.044
5.6
--Ov»9
O.OS1
10.5
0.66
0.035
5.3
n.48
0.049
10.2
0.66
0.035
S.3
0.43
0.049
li.. 2
0.66
0.035
3.3
0.48
0.049
1...2
0.83
.042
5.1
o.7g
.046
5.8
0.90
.033
3.7
0.67
.001
0.2
0.74
.014
1.9
.001
0.1
0.83
.016
2.0
0.85
.02.3
0.8?
.Ola
2.2
0 * 3 3
.022
2.7
0.62
.02.3
3.7
0.67
.024
3.S
0.6?
.021
3.7
0.67
.024
0.6?
.J23
3.7
0.67
.024
3.S
193.
3.
1.8
159,
13.
8.2
177.
2.
1.3
192.
6.
2.9
194.
0.
0.0
192.
3.
1.5
212.
3.
1.4
207.
3.
200.
3.
1.7
S.
2.5
179.
6.
3.1
191.
3.
1.5
179.
6.
3.1
191.
3.
1.5
179.
6.
3.1
191.
3.
1.5
INERTIA WT 3500
FE
BARO
(MPG) (IN-HG)
52.1 29.0V
1.4 0.016
2.6 O.OS
52.5
0.9
1.7
63.8
5.0
7.3
57.4
0.3
1.4
52.6
1.5
2.8
52.1
0.0
0.0
53.0
0.7
1.3
47.8
0.7
1.5
49.1
0.7
50.6
0.9
1.8
"90.8
1.2
2.4
56.3
1.7
3.0
53.1
o.a
1.5
56.3
1.7
3.0
53.1
0.3
1.5
56.3
1.7
3.0
S3.1
o.a
1.5
29.04
0.019
0.07
30.07
0.0
0.0
30.19
0.019
0.06
28.93
0.0
0.0
29.25
0.0
0.0
29.13
0.0
0.0
29.75
0.038
0.13
29.72
0.016
30.09
0.016
0.05
0.016
0.05
29.25
0.026
0.09
29.26
0.018
0.06
29.25
0.026
0.0*
29,26
0.018
0.06
29.2-3
O.U26
0.0*
29.26
0 . 0 1 B
0.06
HUM
ACTUAL HP 12.3
NXFC 08L HSL TLnSS
(GRAINS
/LB)
71.00 0
2.822 .
3.97 1
73.21
1.080
1.48
45.52
12.657
27.81
54.47
0.0
0.0
62.62
0.0
0.0
59.35
0.515
0.87
56.50
0.0
0.0
60.94
0.0
0.0
61.54
0.849
1.38
53.87
6.541
12.14
"*6 .90
2.277
4.65
53.00
1.668
3.15
56.91
1.182
3.08
53.00
1.663
3.15
56.91
1.132
2.08
53.00
1.668
3.15
56.91
1.182
2.0-3
0
0
0
*
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.98
013
.30
.99
DOS
.52
.88
046
.23
.91
001
.11
.94
0
.0
.93
002
.92
ool
.13
.94
001
.07
.94
004
.39
.91
025
.80
.89
009
.96
.91
006
.71
.92
1)05
.52
.91
U06
.71
.92
.^05
.52 ,
.91
.71
.92
uOS
.52
C.V. i? THF CutFFICIF.r.T nr v-ArtlATlON. (STD. l5tV./--£iN "1001.
OIFF.% IS THE .'iIFFE'ENCF "F Tht ME.-'IS 3E*«£E'i THE *f- i^n EPa LASS. (MFW-£"a/EPA «100) .
-------
Table 4
1978 EPA-Peugeot Correlation
Diesel #2 Test Fuel Analysis
Fuel
Fuel A
Fuel B
Viscosity
Flash Point
Cetane index
(Calc.) ,
Cetane Number"
Total Sulfur
% Aromatics
by FIA
Gravity °API
2.31 Centistokes
141°F
45.0
42
0.336% (Wt. %)
35.5% (Vol. %)
34.9
Hg
Distillation-
Barometer
Initial
5%
10%
15%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
85%
90%
95%
Final
Recovery
Residue
Loss
29.41 in.
298°F
384°F
404°F
416°F
430°F
450°F
469°F
488°F
507°F
527°F
551°F
566°F
585°F
619°F
641°F
99.3%
0.7%
0.0%
2.50 Centistokes
154°F
48.5
50
0.282% (Wt. %)
28.0% (Vol. %)
36.7
29.41 in.
314°F
393°F
410°F
421°F
429 °F
443°F
461°F
486°F
513°F
537°F
562°F
578°F
599°F
641°F
652°F
99.4%
0.6%
0.0%
Hg
1 Fuel A represents fuel in use at EPA at the time the program was run.
It was supplied by AMOCO.
2 Fuel B was supplied by Howell Hydrocarbons.
3 Cetane Numbers provided by Peugeot.
-------
FIGURE 1.
TEST FUEL DISTILLATION CURVES
1978 EPA-PEUGEOT CORRELATION PROGRAM
X - Fuel A (AMOCO)
A - Fuel B (HOWELL)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
PERCENT RECOVERED
80 90 100
-------
H
0
00
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
Figure 2
Exhaust Emissions
1978 EPA-Peugeot Correlation Program
HOT START FTP TEST PROCEDURE
AMOCO FUEL-
HOWELL FUEL-
EPA PEUGEOT PEUGEOT MERCEDES VOLKS- RICARDO SWRI SWRI SWRI
BELCHAMP PARIS BENZ WAGEN //I #2 #3
C.A.R.B.
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.0
CRUISE 25 MPH TEST PROCEDURE
EPA PEUGEOT PEUGEOT MERCEDES VOLKS-
BELCHAMP PARIS BENZ WAGEN
RICARDO
SWRI
//I
AMOCO FUEL-j I
e
HOWELL FUEL-
SWRI
#2
SWUI
#3
C.A.R.B.
-------
Southwest Research Institute was able to diagnose the causes
of their offset with EPA by bringing their equipment to Ann Arbor
and comparing it to EPA's facility. The SwRI letter summarizing
their work is included in Appendix 3 to present an example of
how one laboratory was able to resolve its difference with
EPA.
5.2 CO Emissions
CO emissions were lower with the Fuel B than with the Fuel A.
The offset was approximately 25% lower for the Hot LA-4 cycle
and 33% for the steady state tests. Again, however, lab to
lab differences were significant.
5.3 NOx Emissions
NOx emissions remained fairly constant between the fuels and
labs. A slight offset of 1 to 2% between fuels (Fuel A lower)
can be seen.
5.4 Fuel Economy
Fuel economy data exhibited no predictable offset or differ-
ence between fuels. Lab to lab variability was fairly low
also.
6. Fuel Discussion
The two fuels used in this program were meant to show the differ-
ence between the "best" and "worst" that the Federal Register
specifications allow. Peugeot contends that the Cetane Number is
the best indicator of fuel quality. Since the fuel Cetane number
was not varied independently of other fuel parameters it is unlikely
that any strong conclusion relating emissions to Cetane number
alone can be reached in this program. In the EPA-Industry Correla-
tion Program of 1977 (CORR 7801-RL) the EPA lab also used a 2-D
Diesel fuel with a lower Cetane Index than the other participants.
However, on neither of the vehicles used there (a Mercedes 300-D
and a GM Diesel) was the HC offset as apparent as it is in this
program. This could mean the Cetane Number is not the only variable
in fuel quality or that perhaps the Peugeot vehicle used here was
more sensitive to fuel differences like these. The CO variability
tends to support the latter as CO emissions on the Mercedes or GM
were very repeatable between labs.
-------
APPENDIX 1
Individual Test Data
EPA - Peugeot Correlation
Hot Start LA-4 Cycle
-------
.sT^Wn
LAM: rpA
FUN.; *.MOI,O VIM: J'KMU r»i <:>:>*. MOT
IN: 26Y7->di IN-KIIA r : .i
ACTUAL HP
H/V7I- IH'.TNO i'lPF HFin ro NO A
Ft i)KlVF^ DY.Mti uijO ' IHP HAK(; rtllM NXFC OHL hSL
n7-oi-/ti
11 07-dl-7rt
-i-'f 0.680 1.70
shi->.o in.i
Oficib bb'tl.O 10. 1
74.7? l.Oo
(GKAlNS
XL;.)
C..V.
0.610 1.60 |. [(, TS?. ^fl.6
UFV. .0990 0 . 1 4 1 .O^H h. 0.>*
16.^ ?. H?. < l.i J.2
29.iiH 71. '.9 0.9H
0.0 4.^68 .031
0.0 6.42.1
tiAG IJAT-X
DATt:
0 f-ii\ -7M
07-0 1 -7o
fF ,1NO TYPK
j
79'l
-tf '»N
('. . V .
HFV.
0.4h4 0./42 0.0 !.?) 1.90 n.O 1.17 1.15 O.'i 360. J4b. 0. 2B.O 29.2 0.0
0.0'>2 0.111 0.0 O.O'l 0.10 0.0 0.01 0.04 O.ii 3. 8. 0. 0.2 0.7 0.0
1 9 . H 1 - . 0 0.0 b . 1 f> . b il.O 1 . ? 3.7 0.0 0 . M ? . b 0.0 0 . B 2.4 0.0
1^ THK. CDnKFICItMT OF V AM 1 AT I »N. ( STi). OF V. /HC ,'(N "100).
:f. i^, int. i-iFf t QHNC.F: OF rne. Mh .NS METwtHN IHK 'it-.; ANO t^u I.AH.
iNf CO:tri.;TS PEMTlNFfll Tl) THE .E TFSfS AlH I.MCiTui Ifl Trtr' LAST TABLt OF ThIS APPEU'lX.
\
-------
LAM O'li-Ki 'I ,'((MN SUMMARY - rh'ST OAl;. PKOC.tSStu: f-.AM , <
LAri! tHA f'UFI.: il'i^Kl.l. ^Fli: PUJi>rm r".i<*. nor Vlf-i: 2677'iOI IMFKTIA T: iiaOO ftf. FlML Hi-: 12.3
OATt It' -.TWO 1 VCK UK 1 1') rn MOx CO? FE H* I VKt< (miU 01)0'.' IMP HA(;0 nUM NXKC OHL HSL TL«»SS
0/-IU-7H /'Jt',16 -i .T n.J'KI l.r'O I. It
07-01-7(1 /'<)Sia i'-'T 0.370 I .?() l.lh 339. | (MHii) ( IN--ir,) (OKAINS
/LH)
Mh«N 0.37S !.?!> 1.1<» Kl. c;9.r, 29.1'f. 74.0?) 1.00
M.U|.,A.,|) DM/. .0071 (l.OHl .007 ^. 0.1 0.0 ^..Jftr' .011
I- . V . 1 . v 'i . 1 0 . h 0 . 0.-«56 0.0 1.02 1 . .tb 0.0 1.16 1.12 0.«> 3S6. 3?9. 0. 26.b 30.7 0.0
0/-01-7M /9 O.JOO 0."?9 0.0 !.()< l.(T8 0.0 1.17 J.13 O.'I 3b3. 326. 0. 26.7 31.0 0.0
(ALL (i/MI) l<(f-iPt.) >l
'HAN !).3fi/ 0.-t'»2 0.0 1.01 1 . (2 0.0 1.16 1.13 0. > 3bb. 328. 0. 2H.b 30.d 0.0
ST'.NiiArfi |)Kv/. (i. 001 0. u 19 0.0 0.01 O.Ob 0.0 0.01 0.01 0.0 2. 2. 0. 0.1 0.2 0.0
>:.V. ^ O.b '»..« 0.0 1.1 (.4 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.0 O.b 0.7 0.0
C.V.';. I. TtiF Cut FF ICltNT DF V Ar< I AT I .;M. I STn. nev./.'-it..m :110()).
I'IFF. 'f. IS IMF" -UKFIvEMCF O*1 THL Mf. Mi .lETWtKM IHFJ 'iFp AND L^A LAO. (MFK-tF'' /EPA «100).
Hulk: Mf COlMi..TS PfRTINI-JMr 111 TtttsE FFSFS AiH l.:>i:.->Ti ) IN TdF: LAST FAttLt ()^ Ihjb APPEN..JX.
-------
I.ALl UiKRFL'.T ION SUMf-UKY - TtST C'AT
» 1979
LAri: HtOG.Mii -BU.CHA"P FUF.I. : AMl'CO Vh'H: PEUr.H'l Ciltvp. HOT VIN: 2h77b01
DATK IE .TNO iiPK nFin m NOX 002 FE ncivrH IWHO uuo-t IMP HANO
4-22-Vfi b -i.°| 0.3SO 1 .34 1 .09 31 3. 32. 3 OP"' 0.0 0.0 30.07
4-22-7H 7 icii 0.374 I.I/ 1.07 302. 33.5 n H>' 0.0 0.0 30.07
MMN 0.362 1.2^ l.OH 30H. 32.'* 30.07
^TANDAi-D Ofcv. .0170 0.122 .014 a. O.tl 0.0
C . V . 4.7 9 . tt 1 . 3 2 . 5 2 . f. 0.0
OltF. , -2f>. -10. -6. -11. 13.2 3.
hA(> HAT A
OATl-. TF.-.TNp TYPK DYMO SITU Ht-llJ ' 3 T« ? 3 NOX 2 3
4-22-70 S HOI H2 0.2H3 0.-.28 0.0 l.Oh l.fO 0.0 1.07 1.1U O.i.
4-22-70 7 HOI f? 0.294 0.-t48 0.0 O.Bly J.-.2 0.0 1.04 1.10 0."
(ALL .,/Hl)
nhAN (I.^H9 O.^IU 0.0 0.9/ l.bl 0.0 1.05 1.10 0.0
-, IAMMA'0 DfV. O.OOH 0.1.14 0.0 0.12 0.13 0.0 0.02 0.00 0 . tl
i . . v . 2.7 .1.2 0.0 U'.J :.4 0.0 2.0 0.1 0.
uIKF. - -25. -^6. 0. -lis. -6. 0. -10. -3. n
I ME
MUM
3 / . 1 cS
36.57
/l.!i
3h.87
0.4U
1.1
-bo.
C02
328.
304.
31h.
17.
n 5.4
. -12.
kllA T: 3500 ACTUAL Hr-<: 1?.3
NXFC fiBL hSL fLuSS
0 . H'.S
0 . flb
>
.002
0.2
-14.
2 3 Kfc 2 3
299. 0. 30.9 33. b 0.0
301. 0. 33.4 33. h O.U
t< (Mi-'G,) > I
300. 0. 32.1 33. / 0.0
1 . 0 . 1.8 0.1 0.0
O.S 0.0 5.5 0.4 0.0
-11. 0 . 14. 12. 0 .
C.V.'>. I. fHF COEFFICIENT OF VAtfl AT I »N. < STI). OfV.
OIK-', -r. |S THf iIFFFHENCF OF Tut Mt" 'NS HET/IEHN I
NO IK: T"F COMMtNp: Pt'HTINHMr TO THt'-E T^STS Ak^
^100).
^ AND t'.PA I.AU. (MF»-F-H.i/tPA »100).
'l" IN THK LAST TAHLt 0^ THIS APPEN'IX
-------
l.AU CtlKH, I U|uN Sl'MM',HY - IKST bATi PKOCtSStu: .-,4K ft 1979
LAW: pHMii oi-HH.ctn -IP ruf-'i. : Miwti.L VI-'M: pHj<,n>r C..JKW. HOI VIN: ?h77bui IHKUIA T: Jboo acruAL HP: 12. 3
«___»- _ ,_. . .._. . . ..»_ ". » . ,-- _. -. - _.» . _ ._.» »- . -.»».__..*. _ » _ « «.«,
0 b3.^^» 0.91
<,-;>l-7n 3 .1 r 0.2f)b> l.iU 1.13 3b2. ?H.H (. H> i|.0 0.0 30. p' b^.^7 O.Sil
i< ------ (.j/Mli ----- >i (HP:;) ( IM-HO.J «>^aiws
/L i)
i-it'tN M.2SS 1.03 1.13 T.S. 2^.4 30. r> b3.9h 0.91
,T«NnA ..() DhV. .OKI 0.0116 .007 10. O.H 0.019 0.72>* .OQ.J
'..^. b.b O.bfl.h2.02.9 0.1 1.30.J
i.'UF. -'H. -?7. -2. -0. 1.1 l
rlUVN D.22H O.t'HO 0.0 0.90 1.1<« 0.0 1.0ft 1.19 o.O 356. 336. 0. 2H.t> 30.2 0.0
sTWiA'-O OKV. 0.016 0.1)12 0.0 0.01 0.00 0.0 0.01 0.00 0.0 11. 9. 0. 0.0 O.tl 0.0
'..V.- 6.1) <».3 0.0 1.5 0.1 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.0 3.0 2.7 0.0 3.0 2.d 0.0
<:\^. -M . -M. 0. -22. -2'. 0. -10. b. (/. -0. -0. 0. 1. 1. ').
C.V.1*. 1 -. TMh ci>f f KIC1ENT OF VAK 1 A I I «M. ( STL). OEv ./'if "N
dl^. "» 15 I'lt" cIFFF.WEMCF. flf THt Mh=-M5 RETKEEN I Hi: nFl* AND tHA I..AB. (MFM-tP»/LPA »100».
Mult:. : Tnt COMMhilT', PK'KTINtMT TO TMf.F T^SIS AHh (..OCAfU) IN THt- LAST TAtiLt Ul- THIS APPf.N"jx.
-------
LAB COKHFL-.l ION SUMMARY - TEST DATA. PKtK.H SSEl! : HAH .'. 1979
LAU: PEUGKOT-PAPIS FUEL: AMOCO VFH! PRl|r,fUT Ci>H<>. HOT VTN! 2677501 INFP.TIA -. T : J50I) .ACTUAL HI1: )2.3
DATt TE'.TNO TYPF. HFID CO NOX CO? FE DRIVER DYNU (>uO| IMP HAHO rlllM NXfC MRL hSL IL"SS
3J I'M' 0.4SO ?.i2 0.98 347. 29. 0 U ii 0.0 0.0 2«.4J b^.6? 0.94
----- >| TNO TYPK IIYNO SITH: HFIL> ^ 3 cu ^ 3 NOX 2 3 co2 2 3 M.
33 HO! .4 0.314 o.'-->75 0.0 1.5/ 2.63 0.0 0.95 1.00 O.n 3b3. 342. 0. 2^.6 2V. 4 0.0
(ALL ii/MI) |<
ME-ftN 0.314 O.S75 0.0 1.'.7 2.t>3 0.0 0.95 1.00 0 . ( 353. 342. 0. ?H.b 2-^.4 0.0
STAMDA^Il UtV. 0.0 0." 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. Q. 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0
i:'v' 0-0 !).0 0.0 (-.0 0.0 O.fl 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.O 0.0
"ll-F- -19. -3. 0. Jf,. «,4. 0. -19. -12. ii. -1. ^. 0. 1. -2. 0.
C.V.* I- THE CDUFICIKNT OF VAR I A T I "N. (STIJ. OFV./MK.N «)00).
PHf. * IS THE 1'iIFFFREMCfT OF THE MF. .NS HETWF.FNj 1 HE ,!FP ANO t.P/\ LAB. (MFH-EPA/EPA "1001.
NOTt: TMF COMMHITS PF.HTIMEMT TO THE -F TF5TS A«F ! HCnTfl; IM THr LAST TAHLE Oh THIS APPENDIX.
-------
LAB COHKFL'U IuN SUMMARY - TEST OAT", PHOUSSHi: -i^H ; , \S
6-19-7H 35 mil 0.273 1.76 1.00 ^54. /?8.6 n H 0.0 0.0 28.^3 !37.SO Q.Ve".
|< ------ (i;/Ml) ----- >| (MPll) UN-MI') (GP4IMS |< --- (Ot'AMS) --- >l
Me.ftN 0.273 !.76 1. 00 354. 28.6 28.^3 b7.50 0.92
STANDARD DRV. .0 0.0 .0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0
c.v.f o.o o. oo. oo. oo.o o.o o.oo.o
OJFF. -45. ?6. -13. 2. -I. ft -0. -21. -7.
iiAfj uATA
DATt IF'-^TNO TYHI. nyNO SITE MF 1U ^ 3 CO .» 3 MOX 2 3 CO? 2 3 M. /
ft-JQ-78 35 HOI H 0.201 O..HO 0.0 1 .V> 2.03 0.0 0.99 1.01 0." 3hO. 349. 0. 2H.2 2>'.9 0.0
(ALL 'i/MD |< (Mr(i) --- -. I
Mt.AN 0.201 0.140 0.0 1.45 2.!j3 0.0 0.99 1.01 O.U 360. 349. 0. 2M.2 2M.9 0.0
STANHA'-D UtV. 0.0 O.I' . 0.0 O.o O.U 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0. 0. 0 . 0 0.0 0.0
C.V. 0.0 u. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.O 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 'J..O 0.0
HIFF'. -4h. -i-3. 0. <^ft. ;
-------
LAB COI |
0.465 1.33 O.'Jf 330.
0 OE«. .0071 0.078 .021 1.
1.5 S.7 2.2 0.4
-ft. -3. -IS. -5.
TNO Tfljt r>YNO SITE HE In
15 MO r O.Jbb O.b50 0.
13 HOI 7 n.350 O.b79 0.
n.353 0.564 0.
0 OEV. 0.004 O.<;21 0.
1.0 3 . 6
-9. -S.
PEUGEOT CORP. HOT VIN: 2677501 1N|R
FE ()PlVEK DYNO 000.1 IHP RAh'O fll.lM
JO. 7 i> 0 = 0 0.0 29,2b SH.99
30. S D 7 0.0 0.0 29.i?'J b8.99
(MPG) ( IN-H(>) (URAINS
30.6 29.27 SH.99
0.1 0.027 0.0
O.S 0.1 0.0
5.2 1. -19.
HAG DATA
3 CO .-> 3 NOX 2 3 C02
0 1.1S 1.42 0.0 0.9S 1.02 O.ii 334.
0 1.12 1.6H 0.0 0.92 1.00 O.u 343.
(ALL r;/MI)
0 1.13 l.bS (l.O 0.93 1.01 0." 339.
0 0.02 0.18 O.o 0.02 0.0 1 0. li 6.
0.0 !.> 11.9 0.0 2.3 1.4 0.0 l.'i
0. -2. -4. 0. -20. -11. u. -S.
riA It JSOO ACTUAL Hi-: 12.3
NXEC URL HSL TL»»ss
0.93
0.93
| < (dKAMS) > 1
0.93
.0
0.0
-ft.
2 3 FE 3
324.'' 0. 30.3 31.2 0.0
3?0. 0. 29.6 Jl.S 0.0
|< (MI-G) >l
322. 0. 2V.9 31.3 0.0
3. 0. 0.5 0.2 0.0
0.9 0.0 1.7 !) . r 0.0
-4. 0. * 4.' 0.
C.V.% r'- THE COHEFICIEMT OF VAKI AT I ON. < STL). OF.V./MhiN »100).
DIFK. * IS THE iJFFERENCE OK THE ME iNS BETWEEN 'I HE MFW AMI) EPA LAB. (MFK-EP^/hPA "100).
NOTE: T'lE. COMME-iTS PERTINENT T() THESE T^STS ARF LOCATHi In THK LAST TABLE OF THIS APPEN IX.
-------
LAB
' | (MPC,)
0.0 0.0 29. 1 1 bl .
o.O 0.0 39.1.'l bfi.
(IN-HG) (
/l.M)
0.90
--- (dHAMS) --- >\
C.V.
I.1HF.
O.ZO'* 0.96 1.00 337. 30.2
.06S1 0.0?8 .014 S. 0.^»
31.9 ^>,9 !./, l.s l.i,
-59. -31. -13. -3. 3.9
29.15 i>3.HO 0.91
0.027 J.^tSa .013
O.I 6.4 1 . b
0. -t'(>. -8.
fi UATfi
niTh TE'.TNO TY>'K flYNO SITE NF I (.1
MOX
3 C02
t. s.
- U-7H
9 HOI 7
11 nor 7
1. 1<»5 0. 140 0.0
n.241 0.^65 0.0
O.H4 1.04 0.0 0.9F 1.07 0.<» 351. 331.
0.1'0 l.oS 0.0 0.94 1.05 O.n 344. 3?4.
(ALL
0. 29.0 3H.7 0.0
0. 2 I
DF.V.
C.V.
0.193 0.^02 0.0 O.H7 1.04 0.0 0.94 1.06 O.n 346. 3?8. 0. 29.3 31.0 0.0
0.06H O.MR8 0.0 O.OS O.Ol 0.0 0.01 0.01 0." 5. 5. 0. U.4 0.4 0.0
35.2 4i.h 0.0 5.^ n.b O.o o.ft 1.3 0.0 1.4 1.S 0.0 1.2 I.t 0.0
-50. -^6. 0. -25. -3;-.. 0. -19. -7. o. -3. -3. 0. 3. 3. n.
C.V.*, IS THE COEFFICIENT OF VAI< I AT lulM. < STI). DKV./Mfc.;iN «10(l).
(tiff. % IS THE UIFFERENCE OF Tht ME.^S rtETWEE'-l fHF .if i-j ANO EHA I AU. (MFR-EP//EPA »100).
NOTt: THf COMMENT1; PERTINEMT TO THESE TFSTS ARK | (iCATf n IM IHp LAST TAHLE (^^ THIS APPEU IX.
-------
LAH COiv'HH." T (IN SUMMARY - TFST IJrtf'
LAH: VOLKSWAGF.N FiJFI.j AMOCO VFH
DATE TE.--TMO TrPF HFH) CO MOX 002
6- 6-78 17 H.IT 0.360 1.54 1.00 362.
6- 6-7M 19 nul 0.490 1.68 1.05 367.
|< (6/Ml ) > j
MfcAN n.4?b 1.61 1.02 365.
STANDARD DEV. .0919 0.099 .035 4.
C.tf.f 21.6 h.l 3.4 1.0
Ult-F. -14. IS. -11. 5.
OATt FF-.TNO TYPF !1YM() SITE MFlO
6- 6-7H 17 HOI 6 0.2bO 0.450 0
6- t»-7M 19 HOT 6 0.3SO 0.620 0
MEAN 0.3Q5 0.535 0
STAMOA^H UKV. n.064 0.120 0
C.V.u 20.9 22.5
MIFF. -21. -10.
: PF_U(,t UT C'WP. HOT VIN: 2677501
FE nf*lvF.i< t»iN() ODO 1 IMP HAHO
28.0 i) 6 n,(i 0.0 29.84
27. 'i 06 0.0 0.0 29. 72
(MP(i) UN-HO)
27. rt 29. 7H
0.4 O.OB4
1.3 0.3
-4.6 2.
r 3 MOX 2 3
.0 1.22 1.H3 0.0 0.96 1.04 O.n
.0 I ,4i) 1.^3 0.0 1.03 1.07 O.o
(ALL f;/MI)
.0 1.31 I.(t8 0.0 0.99 l.OS O.n
.0 0.13 O.n 7 0.0 0.05 0.02 0.0
0.0 9.7 3.B 0.0 5.0 2.0 0.
0. 11. 1 /. 0. -15. -7. ii
I MF P
rlllM
b«.49
60.45
(CHAINS
/t fl)
59.47
1 .3H6
2.3
-19.
C02
364.
370.
367.
4.
0 1.2
3.
TlA T: 3500 "CdiAL hi--: 12.3
NXFC OBL HSL TLi'Sb
0.93
0.94
1 < (f,i 1
0.9J
.006
O.d
-6.
2 3 F> 2 3
360. 0. 27.9 2M.1 0.0
365. 0. 27.4 27.?, o.O
| < (MHb) ^ 1
363. 0. 27.6 27.9 0.0
4. 0. 0.4 0.4 0.0
1.0 0.0 1.3 1.3 0.0
8. 0. -f. -7. n.
C.V.% I-, THF COrFFICIE'lT OF VAKI/VT lUM. (STO. DFV./.|t.vN «100).
OlFh. f IS THF 'JFFEWENCF OF THE Mt >NS "ETrfEF.N THK MFl- ANf) EPft I.AO. (MF«-KPA/tPA »100).
MOTt: THf COMMt'-ITS PEHTINF.MT To THE..E TFSTS A«F. lOCATri.i IN THF LAST TABLE Oh THIS APPEN IX.
-------
LAO COl-.'Ht-.L o. r M!N SUMMARY - TF.ST
LAH! VOLKSWAGEN FljFL S AMOCO VFH: PEUGEOT O
DATE FE^TNO Trl'F HFIO CO NOX C02 FE (IRIVEH
6- 6-78 17 H.IT 0.360 1.54 1.00 36?. 28.0 U
6- 6-7b 19 >n,r 0.490 1.68 l.()5 367. 27. S 0
MEAN 0.425 1.61 l.i)2 365. 27. rt
STANOAwf) OKV. .0919 0.099 .035 4. 0.4
C.V.f 21.6 6.1 3.4 1.0 1.3
DllF. -14. 15. -11. 5. -4.6
OATt FE-.TNO TYPP 'lYf'O SITE HE In - 3 Cu
6- 6-7H 17 HOI 6 0.260 O.«50 0.0 1.22
6- 6-78 19 MOT 6 0.350 O.r>20 0.0 1 .4i|
MEAN 0.3Q5 0.535 0.0 1.31
STANDARD UKV. 0.064 0.120 0.0 0.13
C.V.i- 20.9 22.5 0.0 <>.7
DUE. > -21. -10. 0. 11.
JtfP. HOI VIN! 2677501
UVUO 01)0 ' I HP flAP.O
6 0.0 0.0 29. H4
6 0.0 0.0 29.72
29. 7 ft
0.084
0.3
2.
HAG DATA
',' 3 NOX 2 3
1.H3 >).0 0.96 1.04 O.H
1.1'3 0.0 1.03 1.07 0.0
(ALL fi/MI)
l.ifB 0.0 0.99 1.05 O.n
0.07 0.0 0.05 0.02 0.0
3.H it. o 5.0 2.0 0.
11. 0. -15. -7. o
INFfMIA F: 3500 'ICIHAL Hi1: 1 <' . J
nlll-t NXFC URL HSL TLI'SS
58.49 0.93
60.45 0.94
/I")
59.47 0.93
1.3H6 .006
2.3 0.6
-19.' -6.
C02 2 3 Ft 's 3
364. 360. 0. 27.9 2H.1 0.0
370. 365. 0. 27.4 27.6 0.0
I < (MFb) > 1
367. 363. 0. 27.6 2V. 9 0.0
4. 4. 0. 0.4 0.4 0.0
0 1.2 1.0 0.0 1.3 1.3 0.0
3. 8. 0. -<:. -V. o.
C.V.% I , THF COEFFICIENT OF VARI AT 1 UN. (STD. DRV. /Hi. \H »100).
DIFI-. * IS THF ilFFFKEMCF OF THE ME >NS "ETrtEEM THF HEM ANH EPA I AB. (MFK-I-PA/tPA »100).
MOTt: THF COMME-1TS PEIU1MFNT Tl) THE .,£ TFSTS AHE I'K/Uri.i IM THF LAST TAHLE OF THIS APPEN IX.
-------
I.AH CtVKKL.". Ml'N SUMMARY - TEST DM*
1. AH: HlCAi-MX) FUEL: AMOCO VFH: PEUGEOT C<
OnTK TE'.TNO 1 rl'F Hf'IO CO MOX C02 FE OHlVtrt
6-14-78 29 I..IT 0.414 1.29 1.09 357. 28.3 0
6-14-7f) 31 H-iT 0.453 1.4/ 1.03 352. 28. « 11
MEAN 0.433 1.38 1.06 355. 28.6
STAMOA'.D Dt.V. .0276 0.127 .042 4. 0.4
<:.V. 6.4 '>.2 4.0 1.0 1.2
UIFF, " -12. -1. -8. 2. -1.8
OATE FESTNO TYPE DYNO SITE HE ID ^ 3 o.o
6-14-7U 29 MOT 0.323 0.'*98 0.0 l.OS
6-14-78 31 HOI n.369 O.'OO 0.0 1.1')
MEAN n.346 0.514 0.0 1.12
STANl>A"n OEV. 0.033 0.<>23 0.0 0.10
C.V. 9.4 <*.4 0.0 '*. <
UIFF. ' -li). -13. 0. -3.
'». HOT VIM: 26^7501
DYNO 01)0:1 IHP HAPO
0.0 0,0 30.09
0.0 0.0 30.09
30.09
0.016
0. 1
3.
HAfi UATA
,:' 3 NOX 2 3
1.^2 0.0 1.03 1.15 O.o
7./3 0.0 1.02 1.05 O.n
(ALL iVMU
4.ti2 U.O 1.02 1.10 O.'i
4.19 0.0 0.01 0.07 O.o
95.1 0.0 0.7 6.4 0.
1M7. 0. -12. -3. o
INERTIA T: 3500 ACTUAL HI-: I/. 3
r(UM
^9.24
(DRAINS
/L'O
b3.87
6.S41
12.1
35H.
351.
355.
5.
0 1 .4
. -1.
NXFC OBI. HSL TL'lSS
0 = 93
0.89
0.91
2.8
-H.
2 3 ft- e. 3
357. 0. 2H.4 28.3 0.0
352. 0. 24. 8 2n. t 0.0
355. 0. 28.6 2i<.b 0.0
4. 0. 0.3 0.3 0.0
1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
5 . 0 . 1 . - b . o .
C.V.% I'> THf COK.FFICIEUT OF VAFU A T I ON. (STO. OF V. /flE-.N "100).
IKFf. * IS TME 'iIFFERENCE OF THE Mt»>lS BETWEEN IHf HEM AND tP/\ LAH. (MFH-EPA/fcPA «100).
NOTE: T-'F COMMENTS PERTINENT TO THE'.E TFSTS ARf lOC^T'li IN IHf LAST TABLE UF THIS APPEN IX.
-------
UAH CO!-'kU-''TlON SUMM^Rr - TEST DAT.',
PHOU S
« i '.'/9
i.. AH: HlCAKO'. i
OATL IEMNO
6-13-78 25
6-13-78 27
MEAN
STANDARD OF
c: . v . »
UIFF. >
llnTf TF'-TNO
6-13-78 25
6-13-76 27
MEAN
STANHA'.D Of.
c. . v . <
UIFF. -
FUELS HUWELI. VEH: PEDGHIT o
TYPE HE K) CO NOX CO? FE UMIVEH
HOT 0.266 0.9H 1.07 357. 28. S 0
ii.'T 0.289 l.()5 1.11 34fl. 29.2 D
|< (G/Ml( >| (MH(i)
0.277 1.02 1.09 353. 28.8
tf. .0163 0.05J .028 6. 0.5
5.9 S.2 2.6 1.8 1.7
-44. -?7. -S. ?. -O.fl
TYP!- OYNO SITE '-"FID 3 O)
HOf 0.232 0.298 0.0 0.9Q
HOI 0.237 0.1.37 0.0 0.90
0.234 O..M7 0.0 0.9i)
V. O.OQ4 O.i;28 0.0 0.00
i.'j *.r o.o H..I
-39. -"6. 0. -<'.?..
>»\>. HOT VIN: 2677501 IMEUflA
OYMO OUO ) IMP BA^O MUM NXFC
0.0 0.0 30.22 47.35 0.88
0.0 0.0 30.22 bO.57 0.90
( IN-HG) ("PAINS
/L.H)
30.22 48.96 0.69
0.016 2.277 .009
0.1 4.7 l.o
4. -33. -10.
HAG OAT A
> 3 NOX 2 .3 C02 2
1.05 0.0 1.05 1.10 O.n 367. 346.
1.19 n. 0 1.09 1.13 O.I. 356. 340.
(ALL r;/MI)
1.12 0.0 1.07 1.11 0.0 362. 343.
0.10 0.0 0.03 0.02 0.0 M. 4.
->.l M.O 2.6 1.9 o.O 2.2 1.2
-U. 0. -8. -2. it. 1. 2.
. i : 3500 M. IUAL HI': i,>.:j
I'OL ':SL iLt'SS
I < «il^A-«S) >
3 Ft '2 3
0. 27.6 29.3 0.0
0. 28.5 29. U 0.0
1 < (MKJ) -> 1
0. 28.1 29. fj 0.0
0 . 0.6 it . 4 0.0
0.0 2.3 1.2 0.0
0. -1. -2. o.
c.v.% I--; THF; cuhFFiciEfiT OF VA^IATIUN. I^TU. nrv./Mir'^N «ioo).
DIFF. % IS THE DIFFERENCE OF THE ME/NS BETWEEN THE lER AMD EPA I.Af). (MFR-FP-VLPA "100).
NOTE! THE COMMITS PERTINENT Tl) THt ,E TESTS AWE LKC-.-T..) IN fHf LAST TAHLt OF THIS APPEN.-IX.
-------
LAH COitHtL.lI fiiN SUMMARY - TEST (.Mr A
Pi«>(,t.SSLO : <. H t 19/9
LAB: SOUT iWrST P.FS I "ST FIJE|_: AMOCO Vf-'H: PEUGhdT Cm*./. HO I VIN: 2677501
IHF.P.TIA f: J500 ACTUAL Hi':
(MTU IF.'.TNO I YCE HFIO CO !JOX CO? FE DFMVfTK DvflO OOO'i IHF> RAMO HUM NXFC DHL >«SL
0.420 1.56 0.4
0.^20 l.SS» 0.4^, .T7.1. ^7.0
|< ------ ((./111) ----- >| (MPr.)
1 S ':! t'014,0 !0«<> ?'-J = .^H 5J.07 O.SLi
1 Swtvl b()3.,.0 10. <» 24.^6 ba.'}) 0.91
(IN-HG) U'HAINS
/LH)
MFAN
i>TAN!iA-;D DFV.
C . V .
IHKF.
l.S/ 0.95
.0 O.n^l .014 4. 0 . :»
0.0 1 . 3 1 . S 1 . 1 1 . 1
-IS. 13. -IB. 9. -7.fi
29.^7 b^.^Q 0.90
0.0 i?.OOH .OOH
0.0 3.0.9
1. -2t<. -9.
0-Ut IHMNO
i'YNO S1TK HFIO
liAG HATA
MOX
3 C02
f- 1
]D_^4-7« 11 iini SWPI 1 O.J20 O.blO 0.0
in-?<(-7ri 14 HOT SWHI 1 0.290 O.S40 0.0
1.2* l.«7 d.O 0.96 0.96 0.0 3H1. 377. 0. 2h.5 2^.7 0.0
Ll/. 2 . ,) 1 u.O 0.92 0.95 0 . li 3h7. 379. 0. 2/.S 2h.6 0.0
(Al.L r,/MI) |< (Mt-'R) --- , I
MK'AN
iTAMUAi-0 UEv/.
(..V.
DUF, -
0.30b O.r>2b 0.0 L1M 1.94 0.0 0.94 0.95 O.'l 374. 378. 0. 27.0 2^.6 0.0
0.021 0.1/21 0.0 0.0'- 0.10 0.0 0.03 0.01 0 . o 10. L 0. 0.7 0.1 0.0
l.Q ".o 0.0 b./i '-,.1 0.0 3.0 0.7 0.0 2.6 0.4 0.0 2.6 O.J 0.0
-21. -II. 0. 2. ?1. 0. -19. -16. ". S. 12. 0. -b. -11. 0.
C..V.* ! THE COIFFICIE'JT OF VAKI AT I'.'M. (STD. OF.'V . /-«F ^N '>100».
ntKF. * IS THE (.'1FFERENCF OK THE ME MS HETWEEN TnK '1FP AND LPft LAB. (MF f<-EIJ'i/EPA «100).
tJOTt: THF C()HMt:iTS PERTIMENT To THE ,E TESTS APt l.OC.vTri' IN THF LAST TABLE OF THIS APPEN U.
-------
LAH COMKM...T piN SUMMARY - TFST DAT.'.
PROCESS! U!
LAB: souT'-w* ST KFS INST FIIFL
DATE IF'.TNO TiTPF MFIlt
10-2*-7B 21 ri-il 0.270
10-2*-7M 2* -i >T 0.320
I <
HE^N n.295
STANDARD flKV. .035* 0
C . -J . 12.0
OIFF. :. -*0.
HATE TESTNO TYPh HYNO SITE
V10-?*-7H .21 HOT SWRI 1
10-?*- 7H 2* "Of SI-.'RI 1
MMN
STANI>A"0 UE'V.
C . V . -
OUF. <
: HOWELL VFH: pfijr.i'oi (,<
CO MOX CO? FE OklVKK
1.20 0.9* 363. 27. H 1
1.29 1.01 171. 27.2 1
-(0/Ml) >l (MPC.)
1.2* 0.97 367. 27.5
.06* ,0<»9 6. 0.*
5.1 S.I 1.5 1.5
-11. -15. 6. -5.*
HFIl) .' 3 CD
0.230 O..I10 0.0 0.^7
(1.260 O.J70 0.0 l.Of-.
0.2*5 0. <*0 0.0 1.01
0.021 O.n*2 0.0 0.06
8.7 U',5 0.0 6.3
-3h. -',3. 0. -12.
iwo. HOT VIN: 2
OY;IO uijO'i IMP
s LI f>us*.o in.
S1 I h07o.O 10.
HAfi (>ATA
/ 3 NOX
l.*0 0.0 0.92
I.'.O (i.O 1.00
(ALL :i/MI)
l.*5 ll. 0 0.96
0.0 7 0.0 0.06
*.9 (1.0 5.9
- 1 i.) . 0 . - 1 H .
677501
F1AP.O
* ?9.?5
* 29.25
( IN-HG)
29.25
0.0
0.0
1.
2 3
0.96 0.0
1.03 O.o
0.99 0."
0.05 0.0
5.0 0.
-13. 'i
INtR
HUM
59.75
6*.* <
Kil'AINS
/L t)
b2.ll
3.3**
5.i
-15.
CO?
36?.
378.
370.
11.
0 3.1
*.
IIA -"I t 350U /ACIUAL H,'t \ r> . J
NXFC DHL HSL TLl.'SS
0.93
0.95
1 < ttjKAMS) > 1
0.9*
.01*
1.5
-5.
2 3 F t 2 3
36*. 0. 27.9 2/.7 0.0
365. 0. 26. H 2/.t> 0.0
,<__(MK,,___>,
365. 0. 27.3 27.o 0.0
1. 0. 0.0 (i.l 0.0
0.2 0.0 2.8 U.3 0.0
H. 0. --). -t'. 0.
C.V.* I- THE COI-TFICIF.MT OF VAiU AT Ii>N. (STO. OFV./'lt'.N «100).
Olff . t- IS THE iIFFF&ENC.F OF THE Mt ->NS RETWF.tN IHK UFP AND EPA LAB. (MFR-EP'V/EPA »100).
NOTE: T>IF co.'iMf;f,'Tc; PERTINENT TO THE:>F. TFSTS AMI i-ic-'irn: in TH*- LAST TABLE o^ rms APPEN ix.
-------
LAB CntfP.KL.UlON SUMMARY - TEST UAT-\
H>Fn)O Sse I.' : "Ak -
LAH: SOUTHWEST RES IMST FIJF'L! AMOCO V£H: PEIH1FOT Ci'PM. Hf)l VIN: ^677501
K'ERTIA 1: 3500 ACTUAL H ! 1 ^ . >-,
DATE Th >TNO
HFI!) CO NOX COP FE OM1VF.R DrNO Oi'fln IMP HAKO HUM NXFC OBL HSL TL(.'SS
|0->"»-7rt 11 mil O.^O 1.56 0.96 370. 26.6
10-?^.-7() ]'« -i.-f O.A30 1.5V 0.9^. 173. ^7.0
----- >l (MP(i)
1 Svl- 1 6019 = 0 !0 = 4 29 = ^6 Si.n? 0*9!!
1 S Kl r.03',.0 10. 4 29. ,'<> b3.')l 0.91
( IN-HG) (OPAJMS
/LH)
»iEAN
STAN'IA-?D Df-'V.
C.V.
DlFF. -'
0.460 1.57 0.9S 376. 26.0
.042^ 0.021 .014 4. 0.3
9.? 1.3l.bl.Il.l
-7. 13. -18. 9. -7.fl
29. ?7 S?.<,Q 0.90
0.0 2.00H .OOK
O.d 3.«0.9
1. -2H. -9.
HAli UAT4
IF'-TNO TV^t nvMO SITE HFI|)
NOX
C02
It. f.
11 HOT SV.'KI 1 0.390 O.SSO 0.0
1^ HOT SWPI 1 0.310 O.S50 0.0
I.?? I.h7 0.0 0.96 0.96 0." 381. 377.
Lift 2.nl 0.0 0.9P 0.95 O.D 367. 379.
(ALL C,/MI)
0. 26.5 26.7 0.0
0. 27.5 2f.6 0.0
|< (MI'OI --- >l
OF.V.
i;.V. --
||^^F. -
O.J50 O.S65 0.0 1.1M 1.^4 0.0 0.94 0.95 O.n 374. 378. 0. 27.0 2t>.6 0.0
0.0b7 O.u21 0.0 0.0f> 0.10 0.0 0.03 0.01 O.n 10. 1. 0. 0.7 i) . 1 0.0
16.2 J.8 0.0 b.'t 5.1 ".0 3.0 0.7 0.0 t.b 0.4 0.0 ^.6 0.3 0.0
-V. -5. 0. ?. ?1. 0. -19. -16. i'. S. 12. 0. -b. -II. 0.
C.V.* I'~ THF. COEFFICIENT nF VAK I ATMN. (STI). DFV./MKvN *1
UIF'F. * IS THF. I'IFFFf'EMCF OF THF, ME/'MS HETWEFN 1 HK MK>7 AN[1 LPft I AB. (MFR-FMl/tPA «100).
NOIH: TriF COMMK'ITS PERTINENT To THtNF TF.STS ARE I'KAUi) IN THr LAST TAHLE Oe IHIS APPEN IX.
-------
LAP COi-'KH.. ! ION SU'IM.IPY - TFSI DAT-
H'
MI-: 1
OAlt If STNO I rfT-E HFID CO MOX CO? FE ol'IVFX IJYIIO ODD" [HP HAKO MUM NXF'C DHL "SL U.USS
IO-24-7H
21
24
0.270 1 .i'O 0.9i» 16^. 27. rt 1 S ^'1 MIS6.0 10.^ P^.^5
0.330 l.2(>» 1.01 371. 27.? I Sir/i'M *07i.).0 10. 't 2^.2^
|< ------ (C./MI) ----- >l (MPi;) ( IN-lir,)
S 0.9.1
MF:AN
STANDA^P
C.V.'
DUF. '
n.300 \.?.<* 0.97 367. 27. S
.02.11 0.9-*
0.0 .1..J44 .014
0.0 5.4 l.S
1. -IS. -5.
fi MATA
DATt IF! .TNO TYPf DYNO SITE HFIl)
f u
NOX 2
3 Cl)2 2
10-24-7M
|0-2<»-7H
21 HOT
24 HOT
1
SWIM 1
0.240 0.290 0.0 0 . l> I
0.280 0..170 0.0 1 .0,'>
l.'.O 0.0
l.!jO 0.0
(ALL
0.92 0.96 O.H
1.00 1.03 O.r
,/MI)
36?. 364.
37H. 365.
0. 27.9 27. I 0.0
0. 2t>.H 27. n 0.0
|< (Me'O) --- >l
STANDAi/0 ntV.
(-.V.
lUF'F. "
0.2f>0 O..f30 0.0 1.01 1.45 0.0 0.96 0.99 o.il 3/0. 365. 0. 27.3 27.6 0.0
0.028 O.i!57 0.0 0.06 0.07 0.0 0.06 0.05 O.C 11. 1. 0. 0.8 0.1 0.0
10.9 l/.l 0.0 6. t 4.9 0.0 5.9 5.0 0.0 3.1 0.2 0.0 2.8 0.3 0.0
-33. -»4. 0. -12. -10. 0. -1H. -13. 0. 4. 8. 0. -3. -M. 0 .
C.V.* I1- THE COl: FFICIEHT OF' VARI AT I L'M. ( STO. OEV./Mf.rtN «100).
OIFF. * IS THF: '
-------
LAH COi?«EL»T ION SUMMAin - TEST DAf-'.
PHOCESSf.iJ: '-'AW »
LAri: SOUTHWEST RFS IM'JT FlJFL.! AMOCO VF.H! PEUfiFOT COW. HOI WIN: 2677501 INERTIA ,T: .150(1 ACM.'AL Hr'! 12.3
OATH TE^TNO I rPF HFin CO NOX <".02 FE flPIVf.K DYMO ODO.-.« IMP BAKO HUM NXFC , nBL ^SL T|.l'SS
0.4HO i.ii'J 0.9^. 371. 27.0
|< ------ (C./MI) ----- >l (MPf.)
i S>'"I b03'*.0 iO.4 29. ?6 53.91 O.Vi
( 1N-HC.) (GHAINS
< --- (U'A-lS) --- >\
'it AN
STANOA-0 OKV.
c.v.*
DIKF.
o.'fHo 1.59 o.'M 373. 27.0
.0 0.0 .0 0.0.0
o.o n.o o.o o.o o.o
-). 1^.. -1H. H. -7.)
e^.^6 S:».QI 0.91
0.0 0.0 .0
o.o o.o o.o
I. -26. -H.
naT^
TYFi UYMO SITE HFlD
BAG DATA
3 CO
3 MOX 2
CO? ?
HOT SWRI 1 n.3<*0 O.HlO 0.0
1.1/+ 2.0l 0.0 0.92 0.95 O.I* 367. 379. 0
(ALL ,/MI)
27.5 2t>.!5 0.0
MtAN
STANOAi.'D OF.V.
C.V.
0.3^0 O.nlO 0.0 1 . 1 * 2 . d 1 0.0 0.92 0.95 O.n 367. 379. 0. 2/.5 t^b.'j 0.0
0.0 O.ii n.O 0.0 O.il 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.I' 0. 0. 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 ii.O 0.0 0.0 0.0 U.O 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
-12. 3. 0. -1. ?S. 0. -21. -16. ii. 3. 13. 0. -3. -12. n.
C.V.% I', THt COtFFICIEMT OF VAKl AT I l.'M. ( STU. DKV./Mt .N <>IOO>.
D1FF. * IS THF. I'lFFFKENCF OF THE M(." -MS BETWEEN THE iFk AND FPA LAR. (MFK-FPS/tPA »100).
NOTE: THF COMMffJT-; PERTINENT TO THESE TESTS A|?F l.OCATF!) IN THF LAST TAOLE OF THIS APPF.'*
-------
LAh rft77b01 INKKTIA T: 3500 ACTUAL Hr: 12.3
OATti It >THU I'I'K HFIO CO MIX CO? FF OI'IVHV OYilU (IDU ! ] HP OAkO MUM NXF'C liHL r^'SL TLOSS
lll-<>A-7d ?1 -..f 0.3PO ] .r'O n.9A .Tt>'l. i-7.8 I b I Mlbh.O ID.'. 21.^ t>9.7b 0.93
10-2't-Yti ^A ."'T 0.360 \.t^ l.OJ 171. 27.? 1 b Hi t>u7o.O 10. A 29. 2S 6^..^,^ O.^b
l< ------ (('/Ml) ----- > I (MPT.) ( IN-H(i) (IjRAIMS l< --- U>HA-ib ) ---> I
/Lrt)
i.f-'^f 0.4/ 367. 27. S 29. ?;>
:>T'>Ni,AH-o Df'V. .0283 O.n6^ .049 6. 0.<. 0.0
r,.v/. 8.3 s.i s.i i.s i.s o.o b.4, i.
DKF. -31. -11- -|b. ^. -5.4 1. -IS. -5.
t 3 NOX 2 3 C()2 2 3 f'f.
lil-,.'4-7i) 2\ uii| si-'kl l (1.270 0.170 0.0 O.l>/ l.<»0 0.0 0.92 0.96 O.u 362. 36A . 0. 27.9 27.7 0.0
li)-/4-/o 24 HOI -,WRI 1 M..JOO 0.-«10 0.0 l.On l.'^O 0.0 1.00 1.03 O.o 37B. 365. 0. 2fc>.8 27.6 0.0
(Al-L ",/MD l<
n.2MS 0.190 0.0 1.01 1.45 0.0 0.96 0.99 0.0 370. 365. 0. 27. J 27.6 0.0
'li DM/. O.U21 0.u?H 0.0 O.Oo 0.07 0.0 0.06 0.05 O.o 11. 1. 0. 0.8 0.1 0.0
i .v. f.4 /.3 0.0 o.l 4.9 0.0 5.9 5.0 0.0 3.1 0.2 0.0 2.8 0.3 0.0
n|l-f. : . -^6. -.54. 0. -12. -ID. 0. -1H. -13. n. 4. 8. 0. -3. -H. 0.
C.V.*, I- THK C'H HKJCIENI "K VAh'lAF JuN. (STf). OF V./'lt.-'.N !tl()0).
tUH. ». IS Int. 'IKKH(f.MCF uF Tilt ME. -MS HETWtt'N THK If H AND tPA LAD. (MFK-eJ'A/tHA »100)
tMif: i.'e co-iMt^'irs I'fciuiwENT TO me -F TFSTS AWK i oo.fi u' IN THI: LAST TAHLL OF THIS
-------
APPENDIX 2
Individual Test Data
EPA - Peugeot Correlation
25 M.P.H. Steady State
-------
LAB
- TF.ST OAT''-
PWO(,tSSt'»:
* ll>71)
LAM: LPA
HIM.: AMOCO V/FH: PHIIOOI a
VIN: 26/7Si;i INIHTIA T:
«CIIIAL h :
DATK H. -1HO Trl'F. HFin rn NO* CO? FE HPIVK"! UYflO OnO^t IMP MAR.) HUM NXFC DRL HSl.
07-nl-7H
!l On<)6
n.^1 O.H2
/>i.tm3-2 C^?.S 0.26'« O.'il 0.80
07-01-74 7«J<515-1 C' ?5 0.37S 1.1S O.H!} 200. !S0.3 0 hni)6
0.35S 1.0V O.flO 191. b2.'<
|< ------ (fl/nl) ----- >l (Mf'ri)
10.1
-------
LAH Cf'^PM. « I II/N SUMMARY - TEST OAT:.
(> SSH>:
I. AH:
FllHI. : HHWR.L VFH: PEl|<'M)l U)l'.v.
VIN: 26?75 0.15^ O.S^ 0.8*. 1H8. b3.M
I IMPC.)
(i IJOiib 5671.0 10.1 29.ijfS 73.97 1.00
ii IJOOb S69UO 10.1 29.03 7?.44 0.99
( IN-HG) ((»PA INS I <-
IS) > |
MEAN
STANi)A.-'|l
'.V.
0.161 0.49 O.M3 193. 52.S
.009? O.OS2 .04? 3. 0.^
5.7 I o. 7 S.I 1.n 1.7
29.04 fj.?l 0.99
0.019 1.080 .005
0.1 l.S O.S
-------
LAB C"'«NH... f Mill SUMMARY - U.ST L)AT;i PHOCf.SSh u: \--uH /
-.* _ _ _ __
LAH: f'KUGKOi-HFI ChA.'IM F Utl : AMOCO VfH: PFljOrOt COI-'H. C*2b VlN: 2677S'.)I IW-'HT[A ' T! . FE DMIVHH JJYMO ouo i IMP HARD HIM NXFC DHL "SL TLOSS
,v>q 0.1H6 0.74 0.?H 1S1. (>6.ft I) i). 0 0.0 30.07 Jf..5? O.Bb
8-3 (,-?S 0.17S 0.7^ 0.7S IS?. 66.6
|< (G/Ml) >| (MPG) { IN-HG) (iih-ftirgS |< ((,PA:iS) >l
/L")
HFAN 0.1'Hi 0.76 0.7
-------
I. All CiVKr I. . I |uN SUMM'KY - Tf.ST OAF.
PKOLtSShi'S MAK
l()l'»
I.AH:
i -HF.I
Mini : Hu»/M.i
: «?677S'il lnt"(00
IK .TNO I rf'h HFII) CO N(M. CO;' ft
l»i|0 D|)l) 1 IMP HAKO rtl)M NXKC DHL HSL TLUSS
2-1 ('..?-. 0.110 0.»O O.Hfl m. bH.
d-?. ('. i'^ 0.110 O.hJ 0.91 177. b7..
*.-! i . V. O.ll/ O.fc;i O.tld l/rt. bb.s
<- O.l^1' O.f.a O.'^b 17H. S6.'
|< ------ ('./Ml) ----- >|
IV
D.n 0.0 30.
0.0 0.0 30.
0.91
0.91
/Hi)
C..9
30.1^ tiit.^7 0.91
o.or^ o.o .001
O.I 0.0 0.1
<». -2 4. -8.
-------
LAH CO'-Wl.'.rittN SUMMARY - ThST U.ATc. PWUi:t.Sbhli: '"AH ^ . ]'iTi
_«. ___ _ _ __ _
LAM: cF.uiii oi-PAkf s KUEI : AMOCO VFH: PEuc-r.oi a>.-i>. c'O'S VIN: 267/sol INKHTIA «-r: 35<>u ACTIJAL HP: i,'.j
-- -. _ -. ,. ___ _____ _____ __ _ *._ _-. «._«.».__ « . .__ __ , _ ^ »-.. _ __._
OATt fF ;.TNO Irf'F Hfln CO NOK CO? FE n^lVI.H" [)VMO OUO'I IHP HARD HUM NXFC IHII. HSl. TI,('SS
h_|9-7H 3^-1 (..;; D.214 1.3J 0.67 18«. S3.ft 0 if n.O 0.0 28.93 o?.6^ 0.9<»
3^-? i.-'^-S f).2^') J.3J 0.67 1<^S. Sl.S
l< l(?/Ml) >l (MP(,1 ( JN-MOt (OMAJtlS l< (i,l'A;lS) >|
/LB)
MEAN 0.2^1 1.3J 0.67 19?. 52.6 ?fl.'>3 b?.62 0.9'.
STANMA^'P UKw. .0106 0.001 .OUl 6. l.S 0.0 0.0 .0
0. V. A. M n. 1 n. 2 2.0 2.'» 0. i.i O.OO.o
l.>IfF, : -7. 7(*. -18. -1. O.'i -0. -|j. -4.
-------
I. AH Cdi-.'Kl I .TfuN StM-IM'iHY - TKST IMI'» HHOCh SSr.it: .SAK ,' 1979
___...._ _,._ __«__ _, ____ ..._____ _ _ » _ » _ «*___....._» ~ v __AV____Vn__0_...._«..__«.w.._.»v_.»_«a*.___
I. AH: MKKCh l)r r, tit N.? KlM.'l : AMOCO VFH: HK»K»t»f.- 1 «.UPI-.'. C^'H^ VIN: 26V7SO I INKKTI A 1 J JbOu ACTUAL HH : 1?. J
_ _ -, _«. ._ - __ _ _ «. _. ._-. - _ ___»_ ^>. » -.^_^_ _ . »_ «_ -t _
I1ATK FK-.THO I Wh HflO CD NOX ru:^ Ff. llHM/hw UyiK) DUO:-: iHt^ HAKO rUJM NXFC DBL HSL TLUbS
ft- l-/rt 16-1 . ?- 0.220 O.V'j O./n ly^.. '.->2.l it / 0.0 0.0 ?V.r>b by. 7^ 0.93
l.i- 1-Vrt 1^-1 (. ;)L» 0.201) O.vJ O./f. 19^,. b2.1 n 7 0.0 0.0 29,-eS SH.9V 0.93
|< ------ (I, /Ml) ----- >l (MP(i| ( IN-iKil (CHAINS |< --- ( OKAMS ) ---> I
/Lti)
i it AN , 0.210 H.'Xt 0.74 I'V*. ^2.1 ?y.2b by.as 0.9J
:,TAM.iA-.ri niv. . oi«i o.oi^ ,ni4 o. o.o o.o o.bis .002
C.>/. 6.7 1.^1.40.00.0 0.0 O.f'0.2
nlhF. -11. ?S. -10. 0. -0.3 1. -1H. -6.
-------
LAB C'VHFL .TluN S'lMM-^y - Tf.ST UA|.> HIHK.KSSt'J: M,\K '.
_______________»______
LAH: MKKCU)K<; HE'J/ FIIFI : HIHKLL VFH: PF.IIGr.Ol CO «. Ct^S VIM: 2677SOI UghkTIA -Tt 3500 ACTUAL hr-:
-. _«,«. -. _ . _ «.«_ ^«._ .» __ __ _ __ _ _ __ __ » _ _ ^ __ __«._«._ _ _ __.
DATE TF/.TNO FVf'F HFIH CO NO* CO? FE O^IVE1^ UY'IO OuO-1 IMP HAkO HUM NXFC DHL "SL Tl.USS
w «._ __ _ _ _ _. _ _ -. «-._ _ _ _ ^.. -. » ___ ___ -.___
S-U-7H 10-! IV?'; 0 = 0«3 O^^B 0 = 78 19/». SZiS 0 7 0.0 fi.O ?S».1'.I Sf-.tiO O.vc
5-T1-78 13-1 (..."?S 0.066 n.<«i; 0.78 l«>n. "xl.S 0 7 0.0 0.0 29. U b6.SO 0.9| (MPc-,) CIN-Hfi) (GRAINS l
/LH)
'1FAN 0.07^4 0.<»J 0.7H 19?. b3.ll ?9.n bb.Sn 0.9<;
S1ANIIA''0 Otu. .0130 0.0?.b(>.ll.t.1.3 0.0 0.00.1
M1KF. -6Q. -'.?. -5. -1. 1.4 0. -??. -7.
-------
LAI) CM-Krl .fl'iU MIMMr.kY - H ST IJ;< f
PWOl.h S'jti I : ,-,nn .' , 14/9
LA ft: VOI.K .w-.f
HIM : AMOCO >.»FH:
i.Oi"V.
v/IIJ!
-I: 3bOO ACfuAI. HiJ
II".TK
K :iigo r
01 Nnx r.o^ re. n("'/$ n.177 i.0'» o.ai ?o'>. i.H.4 i)
20-^ C.<\ 0.1 Of, l.JU 0.83 209. 4i!./»
il. 0 0.0 29. /2 oO.O''* 0.9^
n.o o.o 29,yn 60.94 0.94
(IN-HG) (IJ
/Lti)
"( AH
.rAN')A'.'[) Or*/.
<;.v.
n.imt i.nw o.H3 212. <»7.H
.0080 0.031 .016 I. 0.7
<».."» ^.a 2.0 i.'. I.?;
-21. '><«. i. o. -H.IJ
29. vs t>o.9i» O.Q'*
0.0 1M 0.0 .001
o.i o.o o.i
2. -is. -s.
-------
LAH
,1 ION SUMMARY - TKSr (JA I .-.
PHOCtSSKi): f
L AH: VOLK-:W»GF_N F
DftTt TF.-iTNO HCF. MFin
t>- 7-/H 22-1 C-.P'i n.070
22-? (..-.2'i 0.067
t>- 7-7H 24-1 (.: ;2S 0.060
24-? c.:?S 0.070
|<
MfAN 0.069
STANIiA.-p DEV. .0079
C.V.- 11.4
MIFF. - -71.
UN : HOWF.I.I. VFH: pf-:u(ii-.or i:o=-w. o>6?v-i'il INK.RTIA T: ;i500 ACTUAL HI-: 1^.3
co NOX ro? FF nRivKH DYUO UUOM IMP HARD HUM NX.FC I>RL HSL TL»SS
n.ss o
n.SJ o
O.BO 0
n.S4 o
(O/MI
O.SJ 0
0.022 .
4.1
-?9.
«M3 203= S0 = ! !! b !).0 O.f! ,?9./^ b? . J 4 !) . 94
.HJ ?06. 48.7
.87 209. 48.7 0 fa 0.0 0.0 29.72 60.94 0.94
.87 ?()«. 48. ( (Mpr,) ( IN-H(i) (liPAIfIS l< (OCA-IS) >l
/L")
.US 207. 49.1 29.7? 61.54 0.94
023 3. O./ 0.016 0.-149 .004
2.7 1.1 1.4 0.1 1.4 0.4
4. 7. -6.1 2. -1'j. -S.
-------
l.AH Cl-'-l'r I." I I"N SI
- TfST
J: '!AK , ,
K K.A
HiKI s AMOCO
VIM: 2677bOI iNtRIlA T: .3500 «CfUAL
IK .
I''(-K
rn NOA ru^ Kt DI-IVKK uviin out)! IMP HAND HUM NXFL OBI. HSL Ti.uss
30-1 . VS 0.1S1 O.VJ O.n3 ?0"U ^^.c>
30-/> i.-'^S 0.1^0 0.7V O.dO 197. bl.4
3if-l i..-?S 0.17.'l II. M.I O.Hi. ?01. *»y.M
3^-^ u.V- 0.16'y O.HI 0.^1 1 0.93
0.0 0.0 30.0V <»9.,?4 0.8V
( IN-rlG) (OkA INS
/L ')
tiFAN 0.18J 0.7tl (>.rt?_ ?00. bO.h
;-, TAMi>A-;0 DK!v. .009-s O.o't4 .018 \. O.V
r.v. 6.0 ;.& ^.2 1.7 i.n
ult-K . -31 . ft. -U. 3. -3.2
30.(i^ b3.H7 0.91
0.016 0.5^1 .02S
0.1 12.1 2.«
-------
l.AH Ciii'l'll. I l>iM SUMMARY - TtST l>Al<-
LAH:
HiKi: MIIV/I-LL VFM: HKIK.I-OI . u>.*. ci^i> VIM: *h'/7SOI INKRTlA -T: )SOO AC.IUAL HP
re. -.TWO i rrr nKin CD NOX co? FE
IMP MAKU MUM NXFC DHL
TI.OSS
6-13-7M
?H-.?
?s o.im n.^^ o.uh ?os.
?', O.lO', ().«."* O.rt? 19S.
-?', (1.1^1 O.S3 (l.Bt ?OA.
. ^-, n.133 O.bJ O.HI 1.97.
o.o n.o 30.ir;; ««7.35 O.UM
n.o n.o 30.ie^ bo.S7 o.yo
(IN-Hfi) (OKA INS
/LID
I < «>HAMS) > I
llh AN
STAMDA' I) IK- i/.
»;.i/.
i.'H'F. :
c.ii'j o.^y O.M.I poo. so.n
.OlSu O.uSl .(^^?. «... 1.2
13.1 in. b 2.7 2.S 2.tt
O.Olh
0.1
. 7 1 . i)
. -10.
-------
LAW CI'HKH. U I'.tN SUMM-vHY - UST
PHOCl- SSf i' ! '**< '« l'<7>*
l.AH: SOUT>«W ST I/FS INST
FUEL: AMOCO
VFH: PElK'-r OT GO'fv. CH25 VIM: 2h77!i ^b 0.140 0.66 0.59 173. b8.2
16-1 C-Vci 0.14(1 0.70 0.63 183. 55.1
1 S'.i.: 1 ^044.0 10.4 29.24 b3.9r, 0.91
1 S Hi btl4n.O 10.4 29. ?4 t>3.96 0.91
is)
'1FAN
STANDAi'O Uf:"\/.
T.V.
i»UF.
0.127 0.6f> 0.62 179. S6. 3
.0231 0.035 .023 6. 1.7
18.2 S.J 3.7 3.1 3.0
-47. -12. -25. -7. 7.6
29.25 iJ.OO 0.91
0.026 1.66tt .006
0.1 J.I 0.7
1. -27. -fl.
-------
LAH C<»;--Rt L >1 I'lN SUMMARY - TEST IMF,
LAH: SOUTHWEST HF_S iw.T FUEL: HilnFLI
n«TK TE1 TWO TrT-'E HFI!1 CO NOX
10-P4-7H 22-1 ! VS 0.070 O.i.2 0
10-24-7H 23-1 i - I
191.
3.
1.^
-1.
FE nH
S2.5
53. H
52. ^»
b3.M
(MPf,)
53.1
().<
l.S
1.6
VEK DVI-IO OnOM InP RAKO
1 S' «I 6066.0 10. ^ ?9.^S
1 S.I b06n.O 10. U8;'.0 10. '» 29. ,?')
( IN-HG)
29.26
0 . 0 1 H
0.1
1.
INERTIA f: 350o ACTUAL H,-1 : 1 ,' . j
MUM NXFC RL HSL iLi.iSS
bh.Hd O.Q;1
b5.5-» 0.92
bH.47 0.91
56.80 0.92
«i»AIt-;S l< ((-RA.lS) >|
XLtl)
56.91 0.92
1.182 .OOb
2.1 0 . b
-21. -7.
-------
LAB Cii!(KM.-'TK*»- 7 ri
10-,'4-7ct
.-It AN
STANnAi
(': . v . .
i ) I f f .
ST ITNO 1 iT'K HFID CO
13-| i -i?'. 0.040 0.63
1S-1 i. ,v"-i 0.1 30 O.f.b
lf>-l ('?b 0.130 0.70
| < ((i/M
0.117 0.66
fl OKW. .0231 (I. nib
1 4 . fi s . 3
-SI. -12.
NOA c.nj
0.63 1'12.
O.S9 173.
0.63 163.
1) >|
0.6? 174.
.023 6.
3.7 3.1
-r?S. -7.
i VIM: 267/biil INKRTIA T: 3500 ACTUAL H- S 1^.3
Ft' OPIVhK UYf-JO (ii)0,| I HP HARO hlJM NXFC OBL MSL TLOSS
bS.S 1 b.-vl h.i
Sri. 2 1 S'(-l M^
S5.1 1 S tl
/LH)
29. ?b b3.00 0.91
0.026 I.b6d .006
0.1 3.1 0.7
1. -27. -8.
-------
LAB C01WL..T I DM SUMMAWY - TEST DM"
PKUl
LAM: SOOT--W ST I-'ES 1MST FU
0/m; fF-TMO Tri'E HF I [)
l()-?'4-7H i>.2-\ C'-.^S 0,050
10-24-78 ?3-l : ?5 0.060
10-24-78 25-1 (:'?« 0.070
10-24-78 26-1 d 2S 0.060
I <
MFAM 0.060
sTAUiiA'-'n 01- v. .00.^2
C . V . 13.6
1IIFF. - -7S.
'tt : HO^KLL
CD NOx
n.'s2 0.69
0.49 0.66
0.4H 0. 70
O.S4 0.6S
__(f j IVJKIVllvrt | ^ ~"" ( l.tr AMi> 1 ~ " "~ >|
/LH)
29.i?6 S6.91 0.92
0.01H 1.1B2 .DOS
0.1 2.1 O.b
1. -21. -7.
-------
LAI) >:i;! (Ol)T -W r,r PKS I'-'ST Kllf.'l : Af-IOCO VKH: PClH. OT iJO|.'i<. Ci<^5 V I fJ : ^6//'.OI [NMvflA .'T: .ISOO ACfUfiL HH :
- ^ -. ». -- -._-. _. _ » _ . _ .. '_... ^. _ ...-. _. *. -. »._..__ __^._^. ««» * ^^.^^^..-
rr ,TNO ri>t HFJO r.o MOX co? Ft" nwivfK nyi-iu iiijo-1 IMP tuano MUM NAFC otit. HSL TLUSS
10-,'^-7« 13-1 : VS 0.1?(l 0.6.1 0.6-i JH^. hb.5 1 b i;I O030.0 10.4 ^V.^M b|.07 O.-JO
)(l-^',-7d 1S-1 i. ?'i 0.1^0 O.f.b O.ri^ 171. 'jrt.? 1 S.-K! bO^^.O 10. A 2^. <^ t>3.96 0.91
10-PA-7H 16-1 :: ,'S 0.160 (1.7u 0.63 1«3. bS.l 1 S.'n'i OD4.S.O 10.4 2')*?.'* b3.9b 0.91
|< ------ «',/Ml) ----- >l (UPC.) ( IN-HO) (bkAINS |< --- ( bKA")S ) - > I
/LH)
'rif.e'H 0.147 O.bo O.bi! 17'). b6..J 29.i>S S3.00 0.91
STAHMAi-0 lit v. .02"U O.O.'ib .023 '->. 1.7 O.O^b I.66H .006
C . V . 1 b . 7 S . J 3 . 7 3 . 1 3 . o 0.1 3.10.7
i'll-'F. . -3H. -\~
-------
LAU COI--HH -.THIN sUMMflWY - TEST DAT" I'HUU SSI.
LAM: souT'iwi- «.T ».>:s IMS'
OATF Tf^TNO T>P|
pi-^4-7»» 22-1 :! 2 'V
10-24- 7d 23-1 <; -2s
10_?4-7rt 25-1 O?S
10-,?4-7H 26-1 i,--25
ME4N
SlANi(Ai>0 OtV.
C . V .
DIKF. ",
r MI
MFIO
0.070
0.090
0.090
0.100
0.087
. 0 1 2'3
14.4
-61.
rl : HOivfLL VFH: Pt!.l''t-
CD HO.'. CO? fK nl< i
0.42 0.69 19.T. b2.S
0.49 0.66 18«. 53.B
0.4H O./O 19!1. S2.4
O.S4 0.65 188. S3.H
0.48 0.67 191. 53.1
0.049 .024 3. O.tt
10.2 3.5 l.S l.S
-36. -1H. -1. 1.6
nr Cupu. O25 VIN: 2677S01 IMF.PTIA !: J50o rtl.HIAL He: 12.3
Vhrt DV.MO i):iO>l IHI1 HAI<0 HUM NXf'C i RL >'Sl. IL^SS
1 S ..*! 6066-0 in.& P9.VK nH.nn 0.92
1 S -.5'< 0.92
1 S»!'I 60HO.O 10.4 29.25 5H.47 0.93
1 s '1 60H^.O 10.4 29.29 56. (.10 0.92
(f f I 1-i T, 1 / ( « IV A I f ,1 Q t * f f ' i ' A 1 ^ 1 - _ 'v 1
lUrHiJ l*'"AlNr> |<.*~l I. 'r'rt'l /)/-!
/LH)
29.20 56.91 0.92
0.01* 1.18.' .OOS
0.1 2.1 0.5
1. -21. -7.
-------
APPENDIX 3
Southwest Research Institute
Letter Detailing System Modifications
-------
SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
6220 CULE8RA ROAD POST OFFICE DRAWER 28510 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78284
February 16, 1979
Mr. Dick Lawrence
Environmental Protection Agency
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
Dear Dick:
The results from the EPA-SwRI HFID HC correlation are being
finialized and should be completed in the next week. In order that
you may include the some of the highlights of those results as they
pertain to the Peugeot HFID HC correlation I have prepared an ab-
breviated summary.
1. During the SwRI-EPA HFID HC correlation study conducted at
EPA-AA, differences between SwRI and EPA were demonstrated but not to
the magnitude of that shown in the Peugeot correlation. Two Becknan
402 and one SwRI built HFID (Varian detector) were used in this study.
A possible reason for the inability to duplicate the magnitude of dif-
ference could be due to lack of exact duplication of the sampling
interface. This was due to the fact that the Peugeot tests were con-
ducted on a CVS, whereas the SwRI-HC studies were conducted with a
dilution tunnel.
2. A variety of experiments were conducted to determine those
items which could cause the differences in the HC measurements.
These tests also included a gasoline Chevette, Mercedes 300D, Peugeot
504 and Oldsmobile diesel. The items that were found to significantly
effect the HC emissions were calibration/sample delivery, calibration
gas differences, burner optimization and differences in burner response
(Varian vs Beckman). Of the aforementioned items, it was felt that
reading the HC background was the most critical and most susceptible
to erroneous results. By incorporating the EPA overflow calibration
delivery system, using EPA named gases and optimizing the HFID burners,
a correlation was established using the three diesel cars on two
Beckman 402 analyzers. The SwRI FID would not correlate to the Beckman
402 and typically gave values about 75 percent of those from the Beckman
402, even though the detector was linear and gave equivalent results on
gasoline exhaust.
SAN ANTONIO, HOUSTON, TEXAS, AND WASHINGTON
-------
Mr. Lawrence -2- February 16, 1979
3. When the Peugeot correlation vehicle was tested at SwRI,
three HFID analyzers (2 Beckman 402 and one SwRI) units were used.
All analyzers had a separate sample interface along with heating
controls for lines, filters, etc., so all read the sample indepen-
dently. Due to the test schedule time constraints, a manifold system
was developed to enable reading the background bag on all three analyzers
simultaneously. Although that was not the way it is typically done,
background bag readings were not suspect at the time of the tests.
During tests of EPA it was determined that using the manifold system
could cause higher background readings than would be observed from a
continuous tunnel background reading. The exact reason for this is
not totally understood, but by using the EPA overflow system, background
bags and continuous background from the tunnel would read equivalent.
In addition, tests conducted with the Peugeot at SwRI in October,
1978, new tedlar bags were used for the tests. Experiments have de-
termined that new tedlar bags can have 1-2 ppmC residual HC in the bags.
Again this would have contributed to the higher background reading.
Upon reviewing several of the HC traces for the Peugeot vehicle
(at SwRI) it was confirmed that the background bag consistently read
higher than the continuous background from the tunnel. These dif-
ferences were more pronounced with the two Beckman 402 HFID analyzers
than with the SwRI analyzer. Knowing that the background reading was
in error, the results of the Peugeot correlation with the two Beckman
402 HFID's were recalculated using the background bag from the SwRI
FID and the bag cart Beckman 400. The results of these are presented
for the HFTP on Figure 1 and 25 mph steady state cruise on Figure 2.
These bar graphs are presented to make direct comparisons to EPA for
all three of the HFID analyzers used in the correlation study.
In general, using the SwRI FID background values with the two
Beckman 402 analyzers helped but not to the extent of using the Beckman
400 backgrounds. Since it is felt that Beckman 400 backgrounds are
probably the most accurate, discussion of comparisons to EPA will be
limited to that set of date. For the hFTP tests, the Beckman 400
background corrected results indicated that both Beckman 402's read
97-98 precent of EPA with the Amoco fuel and 105-107 percent of EPA
with the Howell fuel. The SwRI FID (Varian detector) gave 72 percent
of EPA with the Amoco fuel and 74 percent of EPA with the Howell fuel
on the HFTP with the Beckman 400 background correction.
-------
Mr. Lawrence -3- February 16, 1979
Both Beckman 402 HFID analyzers read 70-72 percent of EPA with the
Amoco fuel at the 25 mph cruise. These same two analyzers gave 85 and
112 percent of EPA with the Howell fuel. There was some concern over
the differences between the two Beckman 402 analyzers with the Howell
fuel, considering the SwRI background corrections gave 106 and 95 percent
of EPA. Of the four cycle and fuel combinations only the Amoco fuel at
25 mph steady state could not be improved to be within 15 percent of EPA.
4. Based on the results, of the SwRI-EPA HFID HC correlation
study, it is felt by implemented the EPA overflow calibration system,
optimizing the burner, renaming the span gases that SwRI and EPA would
obtain the same HC values on the Beckman 402 analyzers. There is a
difference in response between the Beckman 402 detector and the Varian
detector with the Varian detector reading about 25 percent less than
the Beckman 402 FID detectors. SwRI is in the process of implementing
those aforementioned items to assure HC correlation with EPA. All SwRI
HFID units will be converted to Beckman 402 HFID burners to insure
correlation between HC analyzers in-house at SwRI.
I think that these comments reflect the general feeling about
the HFID HC correlation between SwRI and EFA of Gene Danielson (EPA) and
myself. If you require any additional . input, please advise and I will
be happy to respond.
Very truly yours,
Harry E. Dietzman
Senior Research Chemist
Department of Emissions Research
HED/sat
Attachment
cc: Gene Danielson
Merrill Korth
Karl Springer
-------
--/.,« ll> A IU 10 MIL ll-NI IMLIklt "I X .:: CM
ilVVi.- Kl Ul:l I:L (V LBSI'U CO MAIH.INJIS*
46 1510
Figure 1
------- |