EPA-AA-TEB-84-2
A Study of Exhaust Emissions from Eighty-Four High
Mileage 1980 Passenger Cars
by
John C. Shelton
December 1983
Test and Evaluation Branch
Emission Control Technology Division
Office of Mobile Sources
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
-------
ABSTRACT
This paper describes the results of an exhaust emission testing program
conducted on eighty-four 1980 model year passenger cars. The primary
purpose of this program was to examine the emission performance of
high-mileage vehicles. Secondary objectives included an assessment of
the condition and performance of the emission-related components and the
collection of information for development and improvement of I/M
programs. The work was performed by Automotive Testing Laboratories
(ATL) at the Transportation Research Center in East Liberty, Ohio.
The test vehicles were drawn from the general public in the Columbus,
Ohio area using direct mail solicitation. Only vehicles with over 70,000
miles were sought. This resulted in an average odometer reading for the
fleet of 83,698. The tests performed included the Federal Test
Procedure, the Highway Fuel Economy Test and several short tests. The
program began in April, 1983 and was completed in August, 1983.
The results of this program indicate that some of these vehicles are
capable of maintaining low emission levels although high levels are also
possible due to emission control component failure, engine wear,
deterioration and tampering. The average emission test results were
significantly higher than the standards under which they were certified
and somewhat higher than the averages of comparable in-use vehicles at
lower mileages. City and Highway fuel economy values were also found to
be slightly lower than those published in the 1980 Gas Mileage Guide.
-------
Introduction
Few data are currently available on late model, in-use vehicles beyond
the 50,000 mile "useful life" defined by Federal Regulations. Because
approximately half of the passenger cars registered today have passed
that point, this category of vehicles has a significant impact on ambient
air quality. In this project, emission data were collected on a sample
of 1980 model year vehicles which had exceeded 70,000 odometer miles.
The test results will be used to support estimates of future emission
levels from vehicles with this type of control technology.
Purpose
The purpose of this program was three-fold:
1. To gather advanced information on high mileage vehicles in order
to better predict future emissions from vehicles which have
accumulated mileage at a more normal rate.
2. To identify weaknesses and potential failure areas in emission
control systems so that the effectiveness of the regulatory
process can be enhanced.
3. To provide information for development and improvement of
inspection/maintenance programs.
Program Design
This work was performed by Automotive Testing Laboratories (ATL) at the
Transportation Research Center of Ohio under EPA Contract tfo.
68-03-3157. Eighty-four vehicles of the 1980 model year with over 70,000
miles were sought at random from a direct mailing. The vehicles selected
were in customer use and were tested "as-received" in order to reflect
differences in usage, maintenance and repair. Names and addresses of
owners of 1980 model year passenger cars in the area of Columbus, Ohio
were purchased from R.L. Polk Co. Solicitation packages were mailed to
13,087 owners at random. The package included a letter and a postpaid
reply card with which an owner could report certain vehicle information
and express his willingness to participate. A copy of this package is
included as Appendix A. Since we were seeking vehicles with the highest
mileage, ATL ranked the positive responses by odometer reading. No
attempt was made to procure a sample which represented national sales.
Owners of vehicles with the highest readings were contacted and offered
an incentive package consisting of a fclOO Savings Bond, a loan car and a
full tank of fuel upon return of their vehicle. ATL also offered to
exchange cars at the owner's convenience and promised a summary of the
test results on their vehicle.
At the initial meeting, the principal driver was asked to complete a
short questionnaire and fill out several forms related to the exchange of
vehicles. Examples of these are included as Appendix B.
-------
Oncer*" each vehicle was acquired, an ATL technician prepared it for
testing. Fluid levels were checked and corrected but no other underhood
activities were conducted. A sample of the drained fuel was analyzed for
lead content. Preconditioning consisted of the first 505 seconds of the
Federal Driving Cycle on the dynamometer or driving for 10 minutes on
city streets. This was followed by a 12-24 hour soak period.
Each vehicle was tested as-received in the following sequence:
1. Federal Test Procedure (without heat-build or measurement of
evaporative emissions).
2. "Bagged Idle" test. During this three minute idle test the
exhaust emissions are gathered through the CVS. The FTP
instruments are used to analyze the diluted sample.
3. "50 MPH Cruise" Test. This short cycle employs garage
instruments to measure tailpipe concentrations of HC and CO
during the 50 mph preconditioning for the HFET.
4. Highway Fuel Economy Test.
5. Four-Mode Idle Test. This short test is comprised of four
steady state modes: Idle in neutral, 2500 rpm in neutral, idle
in neutral, and idle in drive. Garage instruments are used to
sample tailpipe concentrations of HC and CO for each mode.
6. Loaded Two-Mode Test. Sampling is done as before usiogc garage
instruments. The first mode is 30 mph at 9:,actual .dynamometer
horsepower. The second mode is idle in neutraL..'. •,..:•• :~-~i'
7. Restart Idle Test. This idle test consists of two operating
modes. At the end of the 6-minute idle period, the engine is
shut off. The vehicle is immediately restarted using the
hot-start procedure and the engine is brought up to 2500 rpm
(+300 rpm). Emissions are measured within 30 seconds. The
engine is then returned to idle neutral and idle emissions are
measured within 30 seconds. Garage instruments are used to
sample tailpipe concentrations of HC and CO for each mode.
8. A complete underhood inspection was performed after the emission
tests.
The FTP and HFET data are used for comparison with certified emission
levels and to help project future levels of air quality due to vehicles
of the 1980 model year. The inspections and short cycles provide
information for development and improvement of Inspection/Maintenance
programs.
-------
Results
The program began in April, 1983. It was conducted sucessfully in
accordance with the design and was completed in August, 1983.
Of the 13,087 solicitation packages sent out, responses were received
from 4966 owners. This total of 38 percent was three percent higher than
in our 1979 model year vehicle program but somewhat lower than the
approximately 50 percent experienced in other similar programs. We
attributed this difference to the text of the letter which indicated our
primary interest in high mileage vehicles. No follow-ups, either by mail
or phone, were part of the plan.
Figure 1 displays the number and type of responses versus time. Eighty
percent of the responses were received within nine days of the mailing.
Of the total responses, 69 percent indicated a willingness to participate
in our program although, because of the mileage requirement, only two
percent were both willing and able to participate. Only acceptable
vehicles with over 70,000 miles were tested with an average odometer
reading for the fleet of 83,698.
MB. a
TOTAL RESPONSES
Undeliverable or no longer owns
a. a s.a IB.a is.a 20. a
Number of Days Since Mailing
Figure 1. Response Rate Versus Time
zs. a
-------
Although no attempt was made to procure a sample which represented
national sales, the test fleet tested reasonably reflects the national
population for the 1980 model year based on Automotive News sales
figures. While there were some shortages of Fords and miscellaneous
imports and an over-representation of Chryslers, Datsuns, and Hondas,
these variances were probably due to the relative strengths of dealers in
the Columbus area. Table 1 presents the sample share versus the market
share.
Table 1
Sample Share versus Market Share (1980 Model Year)
Sample Market
General Motors 50% 46%
Ford 5 16
Chrysler 13 7
AMC 1 2
Datsun 10 6
Honda 8 4
Audi 2 1
VW 1 1
Toyota 6 7
Mazda 4 2
Misc. Imports 0 8
100% 100%
Emission Test Results
A summary of the results from the FTP and HFET tests are shown in Table
2. FTP and HFET results for each vehicle are attached as Appendix C.
FTP results for individual pollutants are displayed in ranked order in
Figures 2 through 4.
-------
C.BB
Figure 2. FTP HC Levels in Ascending
Order
MS.a sa.a TS.B SB.a
1980 Standard
75.81
SB. a
SB. B
SB. a
Figure 3. FTP CO Levels in Ascending
Order
™ 3B.B
8
£ za.a
IB.B
B.B
CO
1980 Standard
IS.a 3B.B MS. 8 BB.B 75.B 9B.B
NUMBER Of VEHICLES
s.aa
s.aa
_ M.BB
Figure 4. FTP NOx Levels in Ascending
Order
a.aa
i . aa
e.aa
NO
1980 Standard
ic.« aa.a SK.B aa.
HtMBER OF VEHICLES
71.a aa.•
-------
This program
Stds/Guide
Table 2
Average Test Results versus Standards
FTP Emissions
N Odom
HC
CO
NOx
84 83,698 1.11 11.2 2.1
- — .41 7.0 2.0
Fuel Economy
Pass
12
100
% of Guide
FTP HFET FTP HFET
19.6 28.3
94 95
100 100
Note: Emission results are in grams per mile, fuel economy is in miles
per gallon.
Miles-per-gallon (mpg) figures for both the FTP and HFET were
calculated. The average fuel economy was compared to the appropriate
values listed in EPA's 1980 Gas Mileage Guide. Figures 5 and 6 are
histograms of fuel economy as a percentage of guide value. The
distribution of the values appear to be reasonable and consistent with
the results of earlier work.
Idle vs FTP Emissions
As can be expected, there was a reasonable correlation between results of
the FTP and the results of the idle test. Using fairly typical cutpoints
of 250 ppm for HC and 2.5% for CO, Table 3 displays the excess FTP HC and
CO emissions identified by the four mode idle test. Excess emissions are
the amount of FTP emissions above certification levels. Shown in Figures
7 and 8 are plots of FTP emission levels versus results of a basic idle
test. •.<•'..
Table 3 "'.
Excess FTP Emissions Identified by the Idle Test
1980 MY High Mileage Passenger Cars (N=84)
HC gm/mi
I
Total Excess FTP Emissions 69
Failed 4 Mode Idle Test
Passed 4 Mode Idle Test*
N
69
5
64
Avg.
0.86
1.99
0.77
%
100
16.8
83.2
CO gm/mi
N
51
5
46
B%
100
23.2 26.1
7.1 73.9
* 2nd Neutral of 4 Mode Idle 250ppm HC and 2.50% CO
-------
Average FE - 94% of Guide Value
2S.B
"r 2a . a
4)
0.
J is. a
U-l
O
Percent
3 W -
S
S GJ
a
-_..
3
1
14
24 24
8
i
3
7S
BB HS 30 as IBB IBS 110
FTP Fuel Economy As A Percent of Guide Value
Figure 5. Histogram of FTP Fuel Economy Values
Average HFET - 95% of Guide Value
25
20 . 0
D
^J
VI
.^ 1 S . 0
•J
u
,? 10.0
SCT
. KJ
n n
*
2
13
3
5
17
6
3
75 B0 BS SB as IBB IBS MB MS
HFET Fuel Economy as a Percent of Guide Values
Figure 6. Histogram of HFET Fuel Economy Values
-------
10
=
s
5.
s. aa
H . aa
aa
2. aa
i . aa
a. aa
*
* *
•
1980,
Typical Idle
Test Outpoint
Federal Standard (.41 gm/rai)
SB
saa
iaa i SB zaa zsa 30a
Idle Test Results for HC (ppm)
Figure 7- Results of Idle Test Versus FTP Values for HC
7S.B
ea. a
MS . a
3B. a
s. a
a. a
Tvoical Idle
Test Cutooint
19SO Federal Standard (7.0 gn/mi)
a. aa
i . aa 2 . aa 3 . aa M . aa s . aa
Idle Test Results for CO (%)
Figure 8. Results of Idle Test Versus FTP Values for CO
-------
11
Underhood Inspection
Each of the vehicles was tested in "as-received" condition to gather data
representative of normal use. An underhood inspection of emission
related components and adjustments was also conducted to evaluate the
degree of any maladjustments, disablements, inadequate maintenance,
defects, unusual deterioration or misbuilds. Any abnormal physical
condition or a measured value outside an allowable range was coded as a
failure.
While results from past programs have shown that vehicles which are in
proper operating order are more likely to produce the lowest emission
levels, only three of the vehicles in this effort were found to be in
proper order and all three of these vehicles failed the standards. A
summary of these findings is contained in Appendix D. Although more
failures of components were noted in this program than in low mileage
programs, no clear area of failures were observed. Typical problems
include idle mixture adjustment, basic timing, idle speed, choke settings
and EGR tampering.
Misfueling
Fuel samples were drawn from each of the vehicles and examined for lead
content. In addition, filler necks were examined and the PLUMBTESMO
(lead sensitive paper applied to the tailpipe) test was conducted. Three
vehicles which required the use of unleaded fuel were found to show
positive signs of using leaded fuel. Those three vehicles failed the-.'.
PLUMBTESMO test, but the as-received fuel sample contained less than .05 ."^
gm/gal of lead which could indicate just a "casual" use of leaded fuel.
This was not considered unusual in that the proportion of all vehicles
which have been misfueled might not be properly .represented in a
voluntary program sponsored by EPA. No filler necks were found to be
altered.
Comparison With Results of Other Programs
EPA has conducted several test programs which sampled comparable 1980
models. During these earlier programs, 345 vehicles from the 1980 model
year were tested. The average mileage for this sample was 18,481 miles.
Of this sample, 42% met their standard with average HC and CO levels
slightly above the standard. Average NOX emissions were slightly below
the standard. These results are listed in Table 4 and are plotted in
Figures 9-11.
Other results were obtained from recent programs known as EF-I & EF-II.
These programs included 170 vehicles from the 1980 model year which were
tested at EPA's Ann Arbor facility. A random sample drawn from within 20
miles of Ann Arbor was obtained using the State of Michigan registration
list. The first 170 acceptable vehicles were tested. The testing was
completed in October 1983. Results from this program are also listed in
Table 4 and plotted in Figures 9-11.
-------
12
3.BB
Figure 9. Relationship of Average HC
Levels to Odometer Reading
2.71
zs sa 75
Odometer in Thousands
IB0
Figure 10. Relationship of Average CO
Levels to Odometer Reading
3B.B
30.1
a.a
This Progra
11.2
1980 Standard
25 Sa 75
Odometer In Thousands
IBB
Figure 11. Relationship of Average NOx
Levels to Odometer Reading
2. SB
2.BB
.KB
z
t
a. SB
a. BO
NO
,60
2.«0
2.13 1980 Standard
This program
1.67 1.69
Old EF EF 1,2
25 SB 75
Odoneter In Thousands
IBB
-------
L3
As can be seen from Table 4, the average emission levels of these
vehicles show a definite trend toward higher levels as the vehicles
accumulate mileage. Without restorative maintenance, the cause for these
differences cannot be precisely determined.
Table 4
Average Test Results From Three Sources
of Emission Factor Data
FTP % Fuel Economy
£ Odom H£ CO NOx Pass FTP HFET
Earlier EF 345 18,481 .57 8.0 1.67 42 88 93
Ann Arbor (EF1.2) 170 36,753 .67 8.8 1.69 28 98 99
This program 84 83,700 1.11 11.2 2.13 12 94 95
Note: Emission results are in grams per mile, fuel economy is in percent
of Guide Value.
Comparison with MOBILE2 Projections
According to the information contained in Figures 9, 10, and 11, MOBILE2
is overestimating HC, CO, and NOX emissions for the 1980 model year
vehicles at higher mileage. Due to the small number of 1980's tested at
the time MOBILE2 was issued, MOBILE2 assumed that 1980 deterioration was
equal to 1975-79 deterioration. However, the 1980 model year contains
approximately 50% GM's, all of which have sealed idle mixture ara± choke
in advance of the regulations (1981). Sealing of-; the parameters led to
lower deterioration, since it is much harder to maladjust idle mixture.
MOBILE3 will incorporate the latest data, and have: signficantly lower
HC/CO DR's than MOBILE2. One other reason for the difference may be that
these vehicles have accumulated their mileage at ah accelerated rate
(approximately 35,000 per year) and therefore, have not encountered as
much deterioration due to aging as vehicles with normal mileage
accumulation. On the other hand, interviews with the participants
indicated that a number of the vehicles are no longer their primary one
and now receive less scheduled maintenance.
Conclusions
The results of this program indicate that some of these vehicles are
capable of maintaining low emission levels although high levels are also
possible due to emission control component failure, engine wear,
deterioration and tampering. The average emission test results of these
high-mileage 1980 models were significantly higher than those resulting
from the EPA Certification tests. Considering the results from other
studies on 1980 models at lower mileage, there is also a clear trend
toward increasing emission levels with age, mileage and the associated
degradation of components and adjustments. On the other hand, the actual
HC and CO emissions (at least for this model year) were significantly
lower than predicted by the MOBILE2 model while the NOX emissions were
only slightly lower. City and Highway fuel economy values were also
found to be slightly lower than those published in the 1980 Gas Mileage
Guide.
-------
APPENDIX A 14
UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGTENCY-
•£;• and
Automotive Testing Laboratories, inc.
P.O. Box 289
East Liberty. Ohio 43319
FIRST—CLASS MAIL
U.S. POSTAGE
PAID
East L;oerty. Ohio
Permit No 5
0/i
'airing icoorctorm >nc
) 221-0334 (Coiumom)
; 513) 66C-I351 ;ESJTUO*TV)
NO POSTAGE
NECESSAfl"
IP MAILED
iN THE
UNITED STATES
BUSINESS REPLY MAIL
-iBST CLASS PS3MIT NO. ; £AST i:3E37V 3HIQ
POSTAGE WILL 3E PAID BY ADDRESSEE.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
C'O
Automotive Testing Laboratories, Inc.
P.O. Sox 289
East Liberty, Ohio 43319
_, ves. ' am mterestea in tms orogram
!
.-eaoing
(?!•••• Mil in odometer raiding)
Tines
Z Sorry. ! "av« cnosen not to oameioaie.
3 : «ouid like more information.
— ; .10 longer awn a ;979 or '980 venicie.
reieonone Best ;ime to can
-------
.. I5
* «» i UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN 48103
CP^'Ci OP
. NCiSE ANS
Dear Vehicle Owner
The Environmental Protection Agency is conducting an important air pollution
study. The actual work will be performed under contract by Automotive Testing
Laboratories (ATL) at the Transportation Research Center of Ohio. You have
been-selected as a possible participant in this program, in which an official EPA
fuel economy and emissions test would be performed on your vehicle. You may
be able to help us and be rewarded for your cooperation.
Our current program involves testing 1979 and 1980 vehicles with high
odometer readings. If your vehicle qualifies, we will offer you the following
incentives to participate:
1. The use of a late-model fully insured loaner car with a full tank of fuel.
We will exchange vehicles at a time and place of your choice. .-<•
2. A S100 U.S. Savings Bond. ;>--
3. Return of your vehicle with a full tank cf fuel. •• .;
4. The results of the emission and fuel economy tests.
No unusual operations will be performed on your vehicle and it will be fully
insured for the entire test period, which will take approximately one week. If
you are willing to participate, a representative of ATL will be in touch with you
to ask questions about your vehicle.
Please complete and return the enclosed postpaid reply ccird as soon as pos-
sible, even if you choose not to participate or if your odometer reading is r.ot
high. Other programs are planned lor which you may be eligible.
The enclosed information sheet answers questions people often ask about :r^s
program. If you have any additional questions, please leel tree to call ?r.sc:ila
Brace cf ATL at 221-0336 or John Shelton of my staff ct (313) 668-42CC. Tr.ey will
be able to answer any questions you may have.
We look forward to receiving your reply card or a telephone call very scon.
Sincerely,
Ralph C. Stahman, Chief
Test and Evaluation Branch
Enclosures
-------
/
1
16
\ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ANN ARBOR- M|CHIGAN 48103
MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSION TESTING PROGRAMS
Questions and Answers
1. Must I participate in this program?
No, your cooperation in this program is completely voluntary. If, for any reason,
you decide not to participate, please let us know on the enclosed postpaid reply
card.
2. Why should I participate?
In addition to a $100.00 U.S. Savings Bond, a leaner vehicle and a full tank of
gasoline, your participation will benefit you indirectly by helping EPA under-
stand and improve the quality of the air in and around your city.
3. How long will the test program take?
The test program takes approximately 1 week. The length of time is dependent
on how many other cars are being tested.
4. Will my vehicle be mistreated in any way?
No, every aspect of the test program has been designed to duplicate everyday
operation.
5. Exactly what will be done to my vehicle?
A complete underhood inspection will be performed. The vehicle must be
commpletely cooled off before the test can begin. This requires that the vehicle
not be started for 12 to 26 hours to simulate overnight parking. Once the venic.'e
is sufficiently cooled off, it will be pushed onto a dynamometer. Althougn the
vehicle doesn't actually move during the test, the dynamometer is a type of
treadmill which simulates conditions which would normally be encountered on
the road. A hose is connected to the exhaust pipe to collect the exhaust. A
specially trained driver then starts the vehicle and "drives" it through a "driving
cycle" which represents typical operation in urban, suburban and rural areas.
Throughout this time, a portion of the exhaust gases is collected for subsequent
exhaust analysis. This analysis allows us to calculate the quantity of exnaust
emissions emitted by your vehicle. Values for the city and highway fuel economy
are also calculated.
(over)
-------
6. How many miles will my vehide be driven during the program?
Yqur vehicle will be driven approximately 100 odometer miles during the testing.
The majority of these miles will be accumulated indoors on the dynamometer. A
10 minute road test might precede the dynamometer testing.
7. How will my vehicle be protected while In your possession?
In addition to providing insurance, we will store your vehicle indoors while the
testing is being conducted. If required to be parked outside, your vehicle will be
located in a locked and secure area at ATL's Motor Vehicle Emission Laboratory
which is located at the Ohio Transportation Research Center in East Liberty, Ohio.
3. What happens to the information obtained from my vehicle?
The information collected as a result of this program is used to determine the
emissions performance of in-use vehicles and its effect on air quality. The data
from your vehicle are combined with data from other vehicles in this area in order
to obtain a statistically valid sample.
9. How can I obtain the results from the testing of my vehicle?
If you request, after the completion of the testing you can obtain the results on
your vehicle. We will forward them to you as soon as all the data have been pro-
cessed.
10. What happens if my vehicle fails to meet any emission standards?
We expect that a certain proportion of the vehicles will fail to meet one or more of
the emission standards. However, none of the information collected from this
program will be used against individual vehicle owners.
17
-------
VEHICLE OWNER QUESTIONNAIRE
DATA SHEET
APPENDIX B
CONTRACT
NUMBER
OS
M
wi 2
£i
H W
Ul t-
M
in
oc
u
S
IUENT
J) what is tins brand naew of th« fuel you itonuily u»« (so* list helow)?
2] H«v« you. or atl*er*. ever noticed a hydroqcn sulfid* (rotten
odoc in ch« vehicle «jUi4«i«c?
1 (n«v«r)
:
3 (occ»«ioajlly)
4 (frequently)
S (don't know)
•4) H you hav«
4) H«v* you nociod any di
-------
VEHICLE OWNEH QUESTIONNAIRE
DATA'SHEET
19
roL-:.NT
com
NOUS
~P
_
-
'RA
ER
n
J
CT
r
M^«
sk
ft
u
u: a
w S
£1
T
JLJ
•
•c«"i"i
!j?
f
uo
u
H
J
U
H
M
in
r
M^M
s=i
tf
u :
> :
Tl
JJ
ti
§
r
ta^M
.
H
U)
U
H
feau
U
0.
>
e-
•••••
BJ
H
CO
u
H
"1
J
CV
U
I/I
r
u
^ffipg^^^^^^rW^O^jg^S^fe^SSSi^SacS?^
m^HHHfl^^HM^^V^^^^"'MlBBH^^^^^^B0^^^B^^^^^^BM^^^^BBVI^HMHBUH
a) On a yearly basis, now many thousands of oils* is tius v«hici« driven?
7) Wh«r* i* th« irivtnq don«7 a) City «xpca««ways
al«M£ ail: >7S\
•xe: 75-51%
•BBM< 50-51V
Utr 1«t or •niwi < 20% a) na^or city «cr*«cj
c) ocn«r city scr*«c*
d) Rural «xpr««rway«
«) Ocnar rural roaos
i) rfow is tn« isvinq dona? *) To and £ro» worX
«lmoct al) : > ?r>l
•Mt: 75-51%
~m*: S0-21\
Ucul* or 0n«: C :o\ SI Sixoppinq and errands
cl ausui«ss Cnoc to and ir-aa *orx)
d) Cv.ner (social, vacations, etc.)
9) Mow did yo« *c hart today?
Appro*. •*.!««
I (0-5)
2 (S-LO)
3 (10-15)
4 (IS- 20)
S (20-30)
6 (ov«r 30)
1 (al«o>c all)
2
3
•o«O
MM)
4 (lied* or non«)
L
2
3
a~lcosi
•oat)
MSM)
c all)
4 (littia or nan*)
I (al«a«e all)
2
3
•esc)
irtMl
4 (Uccl* or nona)
1 lalaosc all)
2 (ra«c)
3
__^_^_ 1
4 (littl* or non*l
1-
Z:..
3 "
alnosc ail)
•oat)
MM)
4 (lic^l* or non«)
1 (
2 (
3 (
alaoiT
•osc)
SOMl
: all)
4 (lit rii or non«)
I (alaose all)
2 (rase)
3 (
soow)
4 (liczl* or none)
: (
2 (
alffoit
B0«t)
. all)
3 (*OM|
4 dittl* or none)
1 (alaost all)
2 (aosc)
3 (*oa«)
4 (lic:l« or non«)
1 (city tcraaci only)
2 (IO«M axpr«*swayl
3 (primarily «xprtssways)
•
-------
VEHICLE OWNEK QU£ST10NNAIR£
DATA SHEET
J6
CONTRACT]
NUMBER
o;
u
* If)
w r
< D
H Z
H U
en H
U M
H ui
OS
(J
- ^
Si
H U
(/I 0.
u >
6- H
w o
u u
H w
4) Oriv«r only
4lWMt 44ll> 73\
•o«t: 75-61%
S«MII SO-21\
Uctl« or rx)n*t < 2O>
b)
cj Ori
2 or
I (aloon *li!
: (»o«e)
4 (lictl* or nen«)
»U)
2 (•»•«)
1 (*OM|
4 (lictl« or non«)
I i«lM«C ill)
2 (a0«e;
1 (SOB*)
4 (licti* or nen«)
Oriv«r only «ten h«4vy cargo
2 (mo«C)
} (
-------
VEHICLE UWNF.R.
DATA SHEET
21
IDENT
CONTRACT
NUMBER
E?
uc,
1.4
ui :'•:
•< :j
H V£
••
p
Ul
N
H
U4
I-
(-1
Ul
fa
St.
Ul
-. y
u :
5» '.
-i
£
t
.
H
Ul
U
H
U4
ft.
h
1
fci
t/l (.«
u u
H ui
Ss=*8S^*StSli^=S8§
14) Ov«r»ll, *rt you rt««on«Aly t*ca*fi«d *xtn UM «/vqin*
t**r?9raA/ic« of vn* v«hici«?
12} How lon HOW lanq iqo ~«r« -.n«s« rep*ira «c«npli*n«l?
t
;i) w«r« ;n««« r«p*Ars «il«c~iv« in ;otr«
-------
VEHICLE OWNER QU£STIONNAIW3
DATA SHEET
22
IDENT
COHTRACT
NUMBER
k?
at
Ul
in 2
•£ TJ
H £
*
si
H U
in H
H uj
^
cc
w
«3
- ^'
*
•
H
U)
U
H
0
U4
a.
h
1
^1
UJ C«
Ul U
H U)
14
23) ru* tn« v*
(not
(don't '(now)
(y««)
(no)
ty«s)
(no)
(nac ce»C9i)
!v«rrvncy)
(:un«-up)
(none)
(noc ;««ctd)
|
. i
t
:
4
5
5
ino a*jj5-sr~Lnc«l
(d«*i«r)
!ind«p«ndene q4r»i;«)
!:uA«-
-------
VEHICLE OWNER
DATA SHEET
23
It
30) Oo you «ccurat«ly k**p r*cord« o< UM fu«i iconuay on tfti* v«Aicl«?
1
2 (noJ
you
1 (y««)
2 (no)
32)
irr or
. M _ .
4J MOAUI
— : don't know || : not r«quir*d jj : n«v«r in«p*ct»d"
U) otd your vwlticl* p*«» or (ail ch* in«p»ction?
2 (fail)
3 (don't know)
4 (not required)
S (n«v«r
Oo«« your
indieac* tha eru* nuater ol •!!•• on your car?
1 (y«a)
2 (no)
bl If 110, specify *rvrox.LMC.« total nu»o«f of aiJ«« eni* v«nicl« lu«
b*«n driven.
-------
24
A) How cites.is the car we are testing cured up?
1 (as lease every six)
aonths)
2 (7 to 12 aonchs)
3 '(Less often than once
•per year)
4 (According to owners
canual)
5 (Too new to be tunac)
6 CVhen deeded")
7 (Other)
3 (Don't Know)
9 (Not Applicable)
(1)
3) now ioag ago was the last tune up?
1 (6 aonths or' less)
2 (7 to 12 aor.ths)
3 (longer than 12 aonths}(
3 (Don't Kr.ow) .
9 (Sot Applicable)
(2)
C) '-"ho did the last tune up?
1 (car dealer)
2 (service station]
3 (independent car:
« (?elf cr ether :s
-a==sr)
7 (Other)
5 (Don' t -L-.OV)
9 (Not Applicable)
-e are interested ir. the a) in the ci.ty
fuel econocy people actually
1(4-3'
get vidx their cars. Hov b) on the highway
r.any -ailes per gallon do
you get vith this car? c) cor.bir.ed city
!C5-7
r.ter "93" if Don't Know)
r.ser "99" if ;:ot Applicable)
a highway
I I
(S-5
-------
25
— \
Has unieAcerl gasolir.ft us-uay
been useo in this car?
2 (15o)
8 (Don't Kac-)
9 (Sot Applicable)
(10)
'Jnleadec. gas is -ore
expensive than leaded
and ac ci=es has been
hard to- find.
a) Have you ever used
leaded gasoline in
this car?
b) If yes,
how often?
1 (yes)
2 (no)
8 (don't knb«)
9 (Not Applicable)
50 (50 or core")
51 (Never)
52 iSeldon)
53 ^Occasionally)
5A (Frequently.)
99 (Don't Know or
nor Applicable)
! C12-1:
P u i
SO
-------
26
TEST NO.: V-300V
VEHICLE NO.
CUSTOMER CONTRACT
NAME: ^_
ADDRESS: /5 I /7)>dGo
; CD/LI'
LI™
STATE: O/t t
HOME PHONE:
DATE/TIME-IN:
/6L>
ZIP CODE:
WORK PHONE: / -
DATE/TIME-OUT :
BOND INFORMATION
OWNER:
ADDRESS:
CITT: C.
a.a.
ffi /-
CO-OWNER OR BENEFICIARY:
NUMBER OF BONDS: /
STATE:
ZIP:
DENOMINATION:
OF?ICS OSS
PAGE
DATE
BY
VEHICLE INSPECTION
PAINT
OK CHIPS
OTHER
PAINT
OK CHIPS OTHER
LEFT REAR FENDER
LEFT DOORS v ,
LEFT FRONT FENDER l2.
HOOD
GRILL
FRONT BUMPER
2DR
RIGHT FRONT FENDER I/.
RIGHT DOORS >-.
RIGHT REAR FENDER ,
TRUNK LID ^<
BODY STYLE
YIN
ODOMETER
ENGINE FAMILY
CERTIFICATION
. 0 e.
/
SEP WAG
REAR END
REAR BDMPE3 ;.-: ^
TOP ..'.".'•.¥.
WINDOW GLASS-.V-'a^;
ANTENNA '•'' : ' """'
HUB CAPS
MIRRORS
INTERIOR
TAPS DECK/C3
LICENSE NO.
TIRE MFR.
C -, 3
~ f£ c
- ! ^. Z°f < ftTglRB SIZE
_ TIRE CONDITION
DON'T TEST ?.CT.;T
ED CAL ALT OTH
~ ". v EXHAUST LEAK
I!ISP. INITIALS
DON'T TEST 35? A
AMENDMENTS 4/OR COMMENTS:
AGREED TO: ^ 'P^^ S 3>
[DATE], BY
ODOMETER:
CONDITION:
CONDITION WHEN RETURNED
DATE: .
INITIALS:
[INITIALS]
Automotive Testing Laboratories.Inc.
P.O. Box 289, East Liberty, OH 43319
-------
PARTICIPANT VEHICLE NO. 379 27
VEHICLE EXCHANGE AGREEMENT
•
Automotive Testing Laboratories. lap. (ATL) is furnishing you a
r o
/ 5 f<7 —
(Hodftl-Ygar) /y< :->^z
( Model-Year )_C»±i£S^ _ (Make, Model) rWs<~'-<^<^a _ I agree to loan ny vehicle to
ATL for a time period not to exceed ~f _ aays unless otherwise agreed to.
I understand I am at liberty to demand tne return of ay vehicle at any time
and that ATL is obligated to honor such and return ay vehicle within a
reasonable period of time regardless of the status of testing. If in t.-.a
opinion of ATL my vehicle is unfit for tasting, I waive consideration as
specified above.
Agreed to this date, -^/^y/?***^ , by
— t — • i —
and.
r -
.:^w^
f. Gangly, President ^^ Vehic
//' ^
/"Drivers lie. i> lIQ/Q1^^ State Ot-f-rQ
PROJECT
-------
I
Appendix C
Testing of High Mileage 1980 Passenger Cars
Results of FTP and Highway Fuel Econony Teats
FTP
HFET
VtH
122
U2
133
130
138
IJ9
100
101
102
144
146
14 '
|48
150
lt.1
Ib2
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
70
n
72
73
/4
'5
76
n
/a
179
180
181
182
184
IMS
1H6
187
iaa
189
190
191
192
MAKE
PLVM
CHEV
CHEV
DATS
BUIC
OATS
CHEV
OLOS
AUDI
PONT
OLOS
CMEV
TOYO
CHEV
BUIC
CHEV
BUIC
HONO
CADI
FORO
TOVO
CHEV
FORO
OLOS
OATS
CHEV
HONO
PONT
BUIC
OLOS
CHEV
OATS
HONO
HONO
CHEV
MAZO
TOYO
MONO
OOOG
OLOS
CHEV
CHEV
CHEV
PONT
CHEV
CHEV
CHRV
PLVM
PONT
CHEV
PLYM
PONT
OOOG
TOYO
OATS
HONO
MOL
MORI
CITA
IMPA
210
CENT
310
HONT
CUTL
0000
GRAN
CUTL
HONT
CORO
CITA
SKYL
CITA
REGA
ACCO
DEVI
LTD
CELI
MONZ
MUST
CUTL
210
CITA
ACCO
PHOE
RIVI
CUTL
CHEV
210
ACCO
CIVI
MONZ
GLC
CORO
ACCO
MIRA
98
CITA
MALI
CHEV
LEMA
MALI
MONZ
LEBA
VOL A
PMOE
CITA
VOL A
PHOE
CHAL
CORO
310
ACCO
C1U
105
151
305
75
265
85
229
231
97
231
260
229
108
151
151
151
301
107
368
351
134
151
140
260
91
151
107
173
350
231
98
91
107
ai
151
86
89
107
225
350
173
229
98
229
229
151
225
225
151
151
225
151
156
89
85
107
MILE
75822
74668
76091
84155
77082
87077
90967
76257
103865
84959
79842
81262
86969
86196
80240
80697
89334
103863
80937
86640
76466
80753
91883
135416
83300
79002
83058
84811
96128
99164
78015
81130
96839
86223
76342
79902
79978
8229Q
81061
104046
88770
78227
79720
79061
78563
105645
105624
96005
92899
107764
85306
76438
75860
99725
83835
77640
HC
.76
.51
.44
.88
.86
.94
.39
.74
1.05
.47
.76
.41
.61
.26
.39
.34
.54
.73
.99
8.17
.37
.74
.59
.38
.53
3.39
.42
.73
1.03
.88
.46
.37
.69
.27
2.U
1.82
.45
.47
1.48
i78
.54
.38
.31
.70
1.99
.57
.79
1.07
3.56
.74
1.03
.42
4.54
2.65
.66
.46
CO
20.22
2.99
4.10
12.33
10.69 '
13.15 .
3.72
6.72 '
11.28
7.49 t
2.46
8.14
8.90
2.22
2.73
4.88
5.32
6.81
8.01
33.67
4.81
5.43
5.20
2.98
13.85
8.18
5.98 i
17.18
8.22 ;
8.92
9.80
4.97 i
7.22 J
2.78
4.08
28.12
2.95
3.92 ]
11.57 :
3.79 C
14.86
3.28
6.35
7.73 «
10.40 i
3.95 5
10.34 ]
10.55 3
9.71 I
11.13 ]
11.81 1
4.32 1
61.20 2
23.62 1
4.61 1
9.27 2
NOX f-£-
.97 25.19
1.96 25.62
J.74 16.53
1.10 28.12
i>.lt) 16.50
2.05 24.66
1.43 18.41
>.24 17.54
1.73 24.44
•.89 17.13
.84 17.79
.42 18.70
.17 23.50
.02 20.95
.33 21.25
.58 22.70
.68 15.28
.89 23.92
.59 13.79
.89 13.69
.47 19.91
.60 22.79
.39 21.23
.39 14.54
.93 27.66
.69 22.23
!.42 23.53
.50 17.86
?,29 15.90
.23 17.67
.99 23.63
>.2B 29.40
>.83 23.86
.05 25.25
.92 22.02
.58 30.65
.01 28.51
.78 .25 .-66
1.33 15.62
1.08 1$.8S
.73 16.53
.91 18.59
.96 20.78
.36 17.34
'.75 18.66
..65 21.29
.43 16.10
.09 16.23
.99 25.16
>.56 21.69
.09 15.89
.24 21.40
.27 18.55
.53 27.96
.00 27.77
.02 20.40
GUIDE
23
24
17
31
17
31
19
20
22
20
19
19
27
22
24
22
17
25
15
16
21
22
23
17
28
24
25
20
IS
20
25
28
25
28
22
30
31
25
17
15
20
19
26
19
19
22
17
16
24
22
16
24
21
31
31
25
HC
.21
.09
.11
.09
.17
.07
.07
.24
.13
.11
.28
.09
.16
.02
.08
.05
.09
.02
.18
.37
.03
.11
.17
.12
.59
.05
.02
.16
.27
.27
.06
.08
.03
.01
.38
.82
.09
.02
.24
.38
.14
.06
.06
.09
.11
.10
.12
.14
.67
.09
.11
.05
1.08
1.04
.08
.05
CO
7.2
.0
.0
.6
1.0
.7
.1
.5
.5
.5
.1
1.4
1.2
.3
.2
.2
.0
.8
.0
.2
.7
.4
.7
.4
29.1
.2
1.2
4.9
.6
1.2
2.9
.1
1.3
.4
.3
13.1
.1
.8
.2
1.0
6.5
.1
1.3
.3
.6
.1
.8
.7
1.1
.0
.3
.1
16.0
7.1
.0
2.0
NOX
1.16
2.06
4.73
1.52
5.82
2.96
1.42
6.81
2.96
5.54
1.98
1.42
1.51
.94
3.51
2.23
2.52
2.68
5.96
3.06
2.33
1.68
2.34
2.24
2.27
.65
3.52
1.43
2.08
1.34
.70
2.88
4.10
1.35
2.10
.69
1.48
2.52
3.02
3.30
.62
1.78
1.28
4.61
2.87
6.37
.60
1.69
2.24
0.05
1.59
1.45
0.29
1.67
1.30
3.80
F.E.
35.27
39.69
26.08
38.96
23.40
34.55
23.83
24.03
34.13
23.00
24.65
25.39
34.64
29.67
36.99
34.84
21.71
35.07
20.07
25.99
30.59
34.95
34.99
20.84
31.25
38.82
34.27
29.35
22.10
24.87
28.53
35.29
33.69
36.71
37.28
46.25
41.80
38.21
23.47
22.42
23.57
24.76
33.35
21.91
27.03
34.42
23.28
22.21
42.09
34.53
22.92
37.22
30.92
00.35
00.19
38.16
GUIDE
33
38
25
01
26
01
26
27
30
27
25
26
01
35
38
35
25
35
23
23
32
35
38
23
30
38
35
30
22
27
30
30
35
39
35
42
43
35
25
22
30
26
36
26
26
35
25
23
37
35
23
37
32
43
01
35
Idle
HC
.9
•-•'Sjtl
47
391
38
38
J8
19
285
3H
U2
19
19
19
19^!
IP' .
38 •
_• i.
1?
75
38
5
9
19
3fl
37
56
9
19
122
19
75
19
150
37
3/
141
56
28
9
56
9
37
9
28
19
19
19
9
207
19
37
37
47
159
9
56
Test
CO
.00
.02
.00
4.94
.01
.09
.01
.01
.37
.01
.00
.01
.02
.00
.01
.01
.01
.20
.00
.00
.00
.00
.01
.00
.01
.01
.18
.00
.00
.00
.00
.01
.59
.24
.01
1 .90
2. 12
.29
.00
.00
.00
.00
.01
.00
.00
.01
.02
.01
.06
.00
.00
.00
2.54
1.97
.00
.59
00
-------
Appendix C
Tenting of High Mileage 1VHU Paaaenger Cara
Keaulltt of FTP and lllgliway Kuei Econoay Teata
FTP
IIFET
;tM MAKE
|93 MAZO
|V-, OLDS
|95 AUDI
|9b CHRr
1*7 BUIC
|9d TOYO
199 OATS
ZOO MONO
201 OLOS
202 OATS
203 FORD
20<. OLDS
?0t> 0000
.?U6 BUIC
660
72503
73<>07
b01b2
61160
737b7
73115
752BO
71157
MC
2.t7
.66
1.67
1.50
.7S
. <.t>
1 .06
.32
.-0
.6J
6.2t>
1.92
1 .OU
,7i>
l.Ub
2.U1
.39
.OJ
.62
.77
.7J
.3^
.67
2.7o
1.12
.56
.63
.56
CO
26.52
7.12 5
26.15
15.60
6.71
8. 8*
12.09
<..66
<«.y*
12.2e
16.<«0
16.71
d.9b
6.6-. i
27-. 7^
75 . 6 i
2.60 :
b.o<«
<«. lo
5.06 «
9.6",
3.76
7.60
39. Ot i
16.26
6.65 3
11.01 i
o.2U 1
NOA F.E.
.77 21. 6«.
>.70 18.6<.
.93 20.59
.09 Ib.'.O
.3<. It. 13
.70 17.60
.On 20.09
.57 23.13
.91 16.07
.*£ 26.36
.69 It. 50
.26 17.07
.61 19. 6t
).9t Id. 21
.7t 22.16
.61 It. 57
).57 17. bJ
.tt 16.62
.!•. 31. t2
.65 17.67
.05 25.97
.66 15.23
.66 17.03
'.06 21.93
.93 15.32
.76 16.10
.91 19.76
.33 17.52
GUIDE
2*.
20
22
17
15
21
31
25
17
26
17
IV
23
20
2t
19
16
17
31
20
2t
17
17
20
19
19
17
16
MC
.6V
.25
.bb
.21
.17
.On
.11
.02
.09
.10
.96
.03
.15
.21
.bO
.6t
.13
.13
.10
.23
.17
.07
.09
1.61
.te
.07
.10
.09
CO
20.2
.7
9.6
.6
.6
1.2
1.0
.5
.1
.6
1.2
2.6
1.0
1.2
16.9
57. b
.1
.1
.2
.5
3.6
.1
.1
22.6
2.7
.1
.2
.9
NOX
1.09
5.91
2. It
.96
I.t7
2. tO
1.55
2.23
2.06
2.71
1.73
1.66
.7t
t>.o3
.91
.26
3.73
.9t
1.25
6.H6
I. I*
1.70
1.9t
2.2t
1.66
3.93
1.26
1.06
F.e.
31.<>5
25.00
31. Ob
20.26
20.85
27.96
tO. 75
3t.27
22.50
3t.62
19.lt
2t.38
29.56
26.07
30.73
20.55
27.07
21. HO
t5.11
2t.31
37.59
22.55
25.35
26.00
21.62
26.10
2t.65
25.07
GUIDE
33
27
Jt
25
22
32
tJ
35
2t
35
23
25
33
27
33
26
25
25
t3
27
36
25
25
27
25
26
25
26
Idl
-V* MC
14
37
1*1
26
19
0
2ot
37
19
207
3tO
l,*9
.'•9
.'-#»
37
,•' ' 9
19
26
ot
38
65
9
9
35<.
28
19
19
28
e Teat
CD
.0-.
.01
t.V6
.00
.01
.0^
2.3'
.Jo
.01
t ,6 i«Mi.s .11^- in
shown in |t|>ut lor 1IC anil in '/. loi
|K-r mile wlillt* t'uel i.'1'ununiy
In oil lea pur gallon. Kesullu I com the Idle lest are
fvJ
vO
-------
Result* of the Lead Tests and Underaood Inspection 30
VEM P8.F PB INOT FUEL CHKE IGNT EGR AIRP PCV EXHS EVAP HISC TKAY
122
132
133
134
138
139
140
141
142
144
146
147
148
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
15$
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
17E
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
1*2
.Ol9 PASS FAIL FAILVifIL PASS PASS FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS
.002 PASS PASS FAIL FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS FAIL FAIL
.009 PASS FAIL PASS PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS
.015 PASS PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS
.028 PASS PASS PASS FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS
.009 PASS PASS FAIL PASS FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
.002 PASS FAIL FAIL PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS FAIL FAIL
.004 PASS FAIL PASS FAIL FAIL PASS PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS
.006 PASS FAIL FAIL NA PASS PASS MA PASS PASS PASS FAIL
.001 PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL FAIL
.009 FAIL PASS PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS
.002 PASS PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS
.002 PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS
.002 PASS PASS PASS FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
.002 PASS FAIL FAIL PASS PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS
.007 PASS FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL PASS PASS FAIL PASS FAIL FAIL
.007 PASS PASS PASS FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
.001 PASS PASS PASS FAIL FAIL NA NA PASS PASS PASS PASS
.001 PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS
.002 PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
.001 PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
.001 PASS FAIL FAIL PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
.001 PASS PASS FAIL FAIL PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
.001 PASS PASS FAIL FAIL FAIL PASS PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS
.011 PASS FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS FAIL
.007 PASS FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL PASS PASS FAN. PASS PASS PASS
.004 PASS PASS FAIL PASS FAIL NA NA PASS PASS PASS PASS
.003 PASS FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS
.001 PASS FAIL PASS PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS: PASS FAIL PASS
.004 PASS FAIL PASS PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
.001 PASS PASS PASS FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASSIPASS PASS
.008 PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS
.001 PASS FAIL FAIL PASS FAIL NA NA PASS PASS FAIL PASS
.002 PASS PASS FAIL PASS PASS NA NA PASS PASS PASS PASS
.001 PASS FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL PASS PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS
.001 PASS PASS FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
.002 PASS PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS
.008 PASS PASS FAIL PASS PASS NA NA PASS PASS PASS PASS
.004 PASS PASS FAR PASS PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS
.002 PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
.039 PASS FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS
.016 PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
.011 PASS FAIL PASS PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS
.002 PASS PASS FAIL PASS FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL PASS PASS FAIL
.009 PASS PASS FAIL PASS FAIL FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS
.008 PASS FAIL FAIL PASS FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
.006 PASS PASS FAIL FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
.006 PASS FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS FAIL
.002 FAIL PASS PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
.001 PASS FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL PASS PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS
.004 PASS PASS FAIL FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
.011 PASS FAIL FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS PASS FAIL
.020 PASS PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS
.013 PASS PASS FAIL FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
.014 FAIL FAIL FAIL PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS FAIL FAIL
.011 PASS PASS FAIL PASS FAIL NA NA PASS PASS FAIL PASS
NA
MA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PASS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PASS
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
-------
RAftUlt* Of COA
T««o tad aad«rt»od In«p«ecioa
31
VEH
PB.F P9- INQT FUEL CHKE IGNT EGR AIRP PCV EXHS EVAP- MISC T*AY
193
194-
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
20*
205
206
209
211
212
213
21^
215
216
217
21$
219
220
221
222
223
^ .023 PASS PASS FAH. PASS PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS
.006 PASS PASS PASS FAIL FAIL FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS NA
.011 PASS PASS FAIL NA PASS PASS NA PASS FAIL PASS FAIL NA
.009 PASS FAIL FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS FAIL FAIL NA
.025 PASS PASS PASS FAIL FAIL PASS PASS FAIL PASS FAIL FAIL NA
.003 PASS PASS FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS NA
.011 PASS PASS FAIL PASS FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS NA
.001 PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS NA NA PASS PASS PASS PASS NA
.001 PASS FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS NA
.007 PASS PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS NA
.010 PASS FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS NA
.001 PASS FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL PASS FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS NA
.010 PASS FAIL PASS FAIL FAIL PASS PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS NA
.007 PASS FAIL PASS PASS FAIL FAIL PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS NA
.003 PASS FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS
.009 PASS FAIL PASS FAIL FAIL PASS PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS NA
.007 PASS PASS FAIL PASS PASS FAIL PASS- FAIL PASS FAIL PASS FAIL
.012 PASS FAIL FAIL PASS FAIL FAIL PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS NA
.011 PASS FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL PASS PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS NA
.018 PASS PASS PASS FAIL FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS NA
.011 PASS PASS PASS NA PASS PASS NA PASS PASS PASS PASS NA
.003 PASS PASS FAIL FAIL FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS NA
.018 PASS FAIL FAIL PASS FAIL FAIL FAIL. PASS PASS FAIL PASS NA
.013 PASS PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS PASS NA
.001 PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS NA
.001 PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS FAIL PASS FAIL PASS NA
,011 PASS FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS NA
.001 PASS PASS FAIL FAIL FAIL PASS PASS FAIL PASS PASS PASS NA
Legend:
PBF
PB
EIDT
FUEL
CHKE
IGNT
EGR
AISP
PCV
ZXHS
EVAP
MISC
TWAY
Lead concent of as-received fuel (gm/gal)
Results of Plumbcesmo test
Induction system (heated air door & temperature sensors)
Fuel subsystem (carburetor, idle mixture, idle speed)
Choke subsystem (choke adjustment and components, fast idle speed)
Ignition system (distributor ass'y, initial timing, spark plugs)
EGR system (EGR valve ass'y, initial timing, spark plugs)
Air injection system (air injection ass'y) valves, drive belt)
PVC system (PCV value, filter, hoses)
Exhaust system (manifold, tailpipe, muffler, catalyst)
Evaporative control system (canister, filter, hoses)
Engine Assembly (engine, cooling system, belt tension)
3-way system (electronic control unit, 02 sensor, other components
associated with the 3-way catalyst system)
------- |