United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
Emission Control Technology Division
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
EPA-460/3-81-024
September 1981
c/EPA
Air
Characterization of Exhaust
Emissions from High Mileage
Catalyst-Equipped Automobiles
-------
EPA-460/3-81-024
Characterization of Exhaust Emissions from
High Mileage Catalyst-Equipped
Automobiles
by
Lawrence R. Smith
Southwest Research Institute
6220 Culebra Road
San Antonio, Texas 78284
Contract No. 68-03-2884
Task Specifications 7 & 10
EPA Project Officer: Robert J. Garbe
Task Branch Technical Representative: Penny M. Carey
Prepared for
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
Emission Control Technology Division
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
September 1981
-------
This report is issued by the Environmental Protection Agency to report
technical data of interest to a limited number of readers. Copies are
available free of charge to Federal employees, current contractors and
grantees, and nonprofit organizations - in limited quantities - from
the Library Services Office (MD-33), Research Triangle Park, North
Carolina 27711; or, for a fee, from the National Technical Information
Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161.
This report was furnished to the Environmental Protection Agency by
Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, Texas, in
fulfillment of Task Specifications 7 and 10 of Contract No. 68-03-2884.
The contents of this report are reproduced herein as received from
Southwest Research Institute. The opinions, findings, and conclusions
expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the
Environmental Protection Agency. Mention of company or product names is
not to be considered as an endorsement by the Environmental Protection
Agency.
Publication No. EPA-460/3-81-024
11
-------
FOREWORD
These project tasks were initiated by the Control Technology
Assessment and Characterization Branch, Environmental Protection
Agency, 2565 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105. The engi-
neering and analytical effort on which this report is based was accom-
plished by the Department of Emissions Research of Southwest Research
Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, Texas 78284. These pro-
jects, authorized by Task Specifications 7 and 10 under Contract
68-03-2884, were initiated on September 25, 1980 and March 16, 1981
and were completed June 1981.
The project was initially under the supervision of Mr. Charles
Urban, Project Leader. Dr. Lawrence Smith, Senior Research Scientist,
directed the project beginning March 10, 1981. Mr. Charles Hare was
Project Manager and was involved in the initial technical and fiscal
negotiations and subsequent major project decisions. The Project
Officer throughout the project was Mr. Robert Garbe of the Control
Technology Assessment and Characterization Branch, Environmental
Protection Agency. The EPA Task Branch Technical Representative was
Ms. Penny Carey. Dr. Frank Black and members of his staff, of the
Environmental Protection Agency at Research Triangle Park in North
Carolina, conducted the elemental analyses.
111
-------
ABSTRACT
This report describes the laboratory effort to characterize
regulated and unregulated exhaust emissions from ten 1978 and 1979
high mileage catalyst equipped gasoline automobiles which have been
driven for approximately 50,000 miles. The ten automobiles were
evaluated as-received and after a tune-up to manufacturer's speci-
fications, over the Light-Duty Federal Test Procedure (FTP) and the
Highway Fuel Economy Driving Schedule (HFET). Exhaust constituents
measured, in addition to the regulated emissions, include: aldehydes,
particulates, sulfides, amines, metals, and several additional ele-
ments and compounds. Additional evaluations involved the measurement
of the regulated emissions over four short-test procedures.
IV
-------
SUMMARY
The major objective of these project tasks was to evaluate regulated
and unregulated exhaust emissions, particularly aldehydes, from 1978 and
1979 catalyst-equipped automobiles that have been driven approximately
50,000 miles. The automobiles were tested as received and after a tune-up to
manufacturer's specifications.
The study involved 10 automobiles: seven 1978 model year automobiles
equipped with oxidation catalysts, one 1978 model year automobile equipped
with a three-way catalyst and two 1979 model year automobiles equipped
with three-way catalysts. Engine sizes ranged from a 98 CID, 4 cylinder
engine to a 400 CID, 8 cylinder engine.
Unregulated emissions measured included: particulates, metals and
other elements, aldehydes, organic sulfides, organic amines, ammonia,
cyanides, hydrogen sulfide, and nitrous oxide. A number of the analytical
procedures for these compounds were developed in previous projects.
The primary test sequences involved in this project were the light-
duty Federal Test Procedure (FTP) and the Highway Fuel Economy Driving
Schedule (HFET). In addition, hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide were
measured in three short-test procedures. These short-test procedures
included: the 50 mph Cruise Test, the 4-Mode Idle Test, and the Loaded
2-Mode Test. The basic requirements specified in the Code of Federal
Regulations for certification of light-duty vehicles were followed for
the primary test sequences.
A significant data base for the cars evaluated was generated in this
project. These data were analyzed to the extent applicable and are pre-
sented in several different formats to facilitate their review and usage.
The FTP overall averages for the ten cars as-received and after tune-up
are summarized and compared to the results from previous related unregulated
emission projects on the following page.
In general, the regulated and unregulated exhaust emission rates for
the high-mileage catalyst-equipped cars are higher than the emission rates
for the low-mileage catalyst-equipped cars, but the rates are considerably
lower than the non-catalyst car rates. Aldehyde and ketone high-mileage
catalyst-equipped car emission rates are only one tenth the aldehyde and
ketone emission rates from the non-catalyst cars. Aldehydes and ketones
appear to be reasonably well-controlled in the high-mileage cars.
-------
Average FTP Emission Rate, mg/km
Emission
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide
Oxides of Nitrogen
Total Particulates
Aldehydes & Ketones
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
Ten High Mileage
Cars-This Project
After
As-Rec'd Tune-Up
780
9,200
1,340
49
.6
0.2
7
1
.1
46
600
6,610
1,020
32
4
0.1
9
1
.1
36
Four 1970 Model
Non-Catalyst Cars
Previous Tasks3
1,900
17,100
2,600
99
37
0.1
4
3
Eight Low-Mileage
Catalyst-Equipped Cars
Previous Projects*3
200
2,525
670
8
2
0.4
12
22
*Data for four 1970 model cars from Tasks 4 and 5 of this contract,
EPA Report EPA-460/3-81-020
Data for eight 1978 and 1979 model catalyst-equipped cars from previous
contracts, 68-03-2499, 68-03-2588, and 68-03-2697. EPA reports
EPA-460/3-80-003, -004, and -005.
VI
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
FOREWORD
ABSTRACT iv
SUMMARY v
LIST OF FIGURES ix
LIST OF TABLES x
I. INTRODUCTION 1
A. Project Objective 1
B. Emissions Measurement Procedures 1
C. Vehicles Evaluated 1
D. Vehicle Testing 2
II. GENERAL EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS, PREPARATIONS AND PROCEDURES 3
A. Automobiles 3
B. Fuel 3
C. Dynamometer and CVS System 3
D. Exhaust Sampling and Analysis 8
E. Instrumentation for Regulated Emissions and Engine
Parameters 8
F. Emissions Test Procedures 10
G. Test Numbering System 13
H. Short-Test Procedures 15
I. Computational Methods 15
III. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES FOR UNREGULATED EMISSIONS 17
A. Description of the Analytical Procedures 17
B. Validation and Qualification of the Analytical
Procedures 20
C. Accuracy of the Analytical Procedures 21
IV. CAR SELECTION AND TESTING 25
A. Car Selection 25
B. Car Testing 27
C. Regulated and Unregulated Emission Test Results 30
D. I/M Short-Test Procedure Results 30
V. ANALYSES OF THE RESULTS 35
A. Regulated Emissions and Fuel Consumption 35
B. Aldehyde and Ketone Emission Rates 39
C. Elemental Analysis Results 39
vii
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)
D. Other Unregulated Emissions 39
E. Comparison of Results with Previous Projects 39
F. Relative Importance of the Emission Rates 51
REFERENCES 53
APPENDICES
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
B. INDIVIDUAL TEST RESULT SUMMARY TABLES
C. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE RESULTS
D. COMPUTER PRINTOUTS OF THE TEST RESULTS
E. SHORT-TEST RESULTS
F. AVERAGE VALUES FOR FTP AND HFET RESULTS
Vlll
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1 Four of the 1978 Cars Evaluated in this Project 5
2 Views of the Emissions Sampling System 7
3 Gasoline Engine Emissions Sampling System 9
4 Driving Cycle Speed vs Time Traces 14
IX
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1 Automobiles Evaluated 4
2 Description of Chevron UL-CQ26B1 Unleaded Gasoline 6
3 Description of Four-Cycle FTP H
4 Test Sequence for Each Automobile 12
5 Laboratory Test Sequence 12
6 Summary of Driving Schedule Parameters 13
7 Sampling and Analysis Methodology for Unregulated
Emissions 18
8 Procedural Validation and Qualification 22
9 Emission Procedural Sample Rates and Accuracy 23
10 Cars Selected for Testing 26
11 Car 01 Emissions Summary 29
12 Summary of Tune-up Adjustments and Part Replacements
(Cars 3-10) 31
13 Summary of I/M Short Test Results 33
14 Summary of the Average Regulated Emissions and Fuel
Consumption Data 36
15 Ratio of the After Tune-up Regulated Emissions and
Fuel Consumption to the As-Received Regulated Emis-
sions and Fuel Consumption 37
16 Ratio of the As-Received and After Tune-up Regulated
Emissions to the 1978 and 1979 Emission Standards 38
17 Average Aldehyde Emission Rates from High Mileage
Catalyst Cars 40
18 Comparison of Average FTP Aldehyde Emission Rates to
Emission Rates from Previous Projects 41
-------
LIST OF TABLES (Conf d)
Table Page
19 Summary of the Average Elemental Analysis Results 42
for the FTP
20 Average Unregulated Emissions Data 43
21 Relationship of the As-Received to the After
Tune-up FTP Emission Results 43
22 Comparison of Cars, 01, 06, and 08 with Results
from Previous Projects 44
23 Comparison of Cars 02 and 03 with Results from
Previous Projects 45
24 Comparison of Car 04 with Results from Previous
Projects 46
25 Comparison of Car 05 with Results from Previous
Projects 47
26 Comparison of Car 07 with Results from Previous
Projects 48
27 Comparison of Cars 09 and 10 with Results from
Previous Projects 49
28 Comparison with Results from Previous Projects 50
29 Relative Importance of FTP Emission Rates 52
XL
-------
I. INTRODUCTION
This report describes the effort to characterize regulated and
unregulated exhaust emissions from ten high mileage gasoline powered
automobiles. The ten automobiles were catalyst equipped 1978 and 1979
models which had been driven for approximately 50,000 miles. This is
the sixth project to be completed from among several related projects
at SwRI involving the evaluation of a large number of unregulated
emissions from gasoline automobiles. The previous projects involved
evaluation of non-catalyst, oxidation catalyst and three-way catalyst
gasoline automobiles.(1*2,3,4,5)*
A. Project Objective
The major objective of this project was to evaluate regulated and
unregulated exhaust emissions, particularly aldehydes, from 1978 and
1979 catalyst-equipped automobiles that have been driven 50,000 miles.
Emissions evaluated include the three currently regulated emissions
(HC, CO, and NOX), along with a significant number of currently unreg-
ulated compounds (e.g., aldehydes, sulfides, amines, ammonia, cyanide,
etc.).
B. Emissions Measurement Procedures
The compound or groups evaluated, along with the sampling methods
used, were as follows:
Sampling
Methods Compounds Evaluated
Bag HC, CO, NOX, CO2, Individual HC and N2O
Filter Particulate, metals and other elements
Impinger Cyanides, aldehydes, hydrogen sulfide,
ammonia, and organic amines
Trap Carbonyl and organic sulfides
The procedures for measuring the unregulated emissions were developed
in another project and reported in a widely distributed interim report.
C. Vehicles Evaluated
Ten 1978 and 1979 model automobiles were evaluated in this project.
The automobiles evaluated included a 1978 Buick Regal, two 1979 Mercury
''Superscript number in parentheses designate references at the end of
the report.
-------
Marquis, a 1978 Ford Granada, a 1978 Volvo 245DL, a 1978 Oldsmobile
Cutlass, a 1978 Chevrolet Malibu (California certified), a 1978
Chevrolet Monte Carlo, a 1978 Ford Fiesta, and a 1978 Chrysler New
Yorker. These automobiles were all equipped with catalysts and had
been driven between 37,600 and 68,000 miles. These cars were either
rented locally, tested in previous EPA projects, or owned by Southwest
Research Center employees.
D. Vehicle Testing
The automobiles involved in this study were tested in duplicate
as-received and in duplicate after a tune-up to manufacturer's speci-
fications. The test sequence included the Light-Duty Federal Test
Procedure (FTP) ^ and the Highway Fuel Economy Driving Schedule
(HFET).(8) To the extent practical, all specified unregulated exhaust
constituents were sampled and analyzed during every test. In addition,
HC and CO emissions were measured in each configuration using three
short-test procedures.
-------
II. GENERAL EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS, PREPARATIONS AND PROCEDURES
This section describes the automobiles, the fuel, the facilities,
and the general instrumentation and procedures utilized in this pro-
ject. The overall sampling systems for the unregulated emissions are
also discussed.
A. Automobiles
Ten 1978 and 1979 gasoline-powered automobiles were evaluated in
this project. These automobiles are described in Table 1. Several of
the cars are shown in Figure 1. The majority of the cars were owned
and operated by employees of the Southwest Research Institute or the
Southwest Foundation for Research and Education. Three of the cars
tested in the project, the two Mercury Marquis and the Ford Granada,
were rented from local leasing agencies or car dealers. One car, the
1978 Chevrolet Malibu, was owned by a local citizen and had been tested
new in a previous project.^-> The odometer mileage on the cars ranged
from 37,600 to 68,000 miles.
B. Fuel
Throughout this project a single batch of Chevron UL-CQ26B1 unleaded
gasoline, the type provided to auto manufacturers for emissions durabil-
ity mileage accumulation tests, was used for all emission testing. This
fuel had been used in previous unregulated emission projects involving
low mileage catalyst cars. The fuel was used in this project so that
the emissions data could be compared with the earlier work without in-
troducing fuel effects. This gasoline is described in Table 2, and has
a sulfur level of 0.03% as specified in Advisory Circular No. A/C 26B1.
The hydrogen to carbon ratio was 1.89 and the SwRI identification number
was EM-470. The fuel had lost some of the light ends during storage
(RVP had dropped from 8.9 to 7). To correct this, n-butane was injected
into the fuel to bring the RVP back up to the original value (8.9).
C. Dynamometer and CVS System
A Clayton Model ECE-50 chassis dynamometer with a belt-driven
variable-inertia flywheel system, was utilized for all transient testing.
This belt-driven inertia system simulates equivalent weight of vehicles
from 680 kg (1500 Ibs) to 2495 kg (5500 Ibs), in 115 kg (250 Ib) incre-
ments to 1360 kg, and in 225 kg increments above 1360 kg.
The constant volume sampler (CVS) used for these evaluations was
SwRI CVS Number 2. This unit has a nominal capacity of 9.2 m3/min
(325 cfm). A nominal 460 mm (18 inch) diameter by 5 m (16 feet) long
dilution tunnel was used between the intake filter and the CVS to en-
able sampling of particulates.
Partial views of the chassis dynamometer, the dilution tunnel and
the intake to the CVS can be seen in Figure 2. Both the dynamometer
-------
TABLE 1. AUTOMOBILES EVALUATED
Project
Car No.
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
Project
Car No.
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
Year Make Model
Body Type
ID or Serial Number
1978 Buick Regal 2-dr 4J47H8H148317
1979 Mercury Marquis 4-dr 9Z62H619190
1979 Mercury Marquis 2-dr F9Z65H637732F
1978 Ford Granada 2-dr 8W81F129943
1978 Volvo 245 DL 4-dr (wagon) VC24545L1176861
1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass 4-dr 3J09A8R467078
1978 Chevrolet Malibu 2-dr 1W27U8Z434207
1978 Chevrolet Monte Carlo 2-dr 1Z37A8K484268
1978 Ford Fiesta 2-dr GCFBTC96187
1978 Chrysler New Yorker 4-dr
Engine Emission Controls
CID/Cyl Catalyst
305/8 Oxidation
351/8 3-way
351/8 3-way
302/8 Oxidation
130/4 3-way
231/6 Oxidation
305/8 Oxidation
231/6 Oxidation
98/4 Oxidation
400/8 Oxidation
Air Pump
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes '
No
EGR
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Chassis Dynamometer
Project
Car No.
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
Inertia
Kilograms
1590
2045
2045
1810
1590
1590
1590
1590
910
2275
Power
Kilowatts
8.0
8.9
8.9
9.8
9.5
8.0
8.0
8.0
4.0
8.4
Transmission
Type/Gears
Automatic/3
Automatic/3.
Automatic/3
Automatic/3
Manual/4
Automatic/3
Automatic/3
Automatic/ 3
Manual/4
Automatic/3
Settings
Inertia
Pounds
3500
4500
4500
4000
3500
3500
3500
3500
2000
5000
CS43N8C149448
Accessories
PS,PB,AC
PS,PB,AC
PS,PB,AC,CC
PS,PB,AC
PS, AC
PS,PB,AC,CC
PS,PB,AC
PS,PB,AC
AC
PS,PB,AC,CC
Power
Horsepower
10.7
12.0
12.0
13.2
12.8
10.7
10.7
10.7
5.4
11.3
Odometer
Mileage
54,522
46,462
48,766
56,993
59,031
47,278
37,577
67,460
67,963
66,038
-------
Car 05 - 1978 Volvo 245 DL
Car 10 - 1978 Chrysler New Yorker
Car 04 - 1978 Ford Granada Car 06 - 1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass
Figure 1. Four of the 1978 cars evaluated in this project.
-------
TABLE 2. DESCRIPTION OF CHEVRON UL-CQ26B1 UNLEADED GASOLINE
Test Method
Availability Date
Tank No.
Gallons
Gravity, "API. at 60°F
Research Octane No.
Motor Octane No.
Sensitivity
Lead , g/Gal .
Sulfur, Wt %
Phosphorus , g/Gal .
Manganese, g/Gal.
Gum, mg/100 m£
Unwashed
Washed
Reid Vapor Pressure, psi
Distillation, °F
(% Evaporated)
IBP
10%
50%
90%
EP
Recovery, %
Residue, %
Loss , %
Acidity of Residue
Hydrocarbons , Vol %
Aromatics
Olefins
Sturates
Benzene, Vol %
Water and Sediment, Vol %
Oxidation Stability, Hr
Copper Corrosion
ASTM D 1298
ASTM D 2699
ASTM D 2700
ASTM D 3237
X-Ray - ASTM
D 2622 (Modified)
ASTM D 3221
EAM 128-74
ASTM D 381
ASTM D 323
ASTM D 86
ASTM D 1093
ASTM D 1319
Chevron Research
Technique
ASTM D 2709
ASTM D 525
ASTM D 130
April 24, 1
94
801,901
58.4
91.6
83.2
8.4
0.001
0.029
0.0002
0.001
85
0
8.9
97
129
212
328
386
97.5
1.0
1.5
Pass
28
8
64
2.0
<0.001
24+
1A
1978
NOTE: These inspection data were provided by the Chevron Research
Company.
6
-------
A. CVS Side of System
B, Entire Sampling System
C. Dynamometer Side of the System
Figure 2. Views of the emissions sampling system.
-------
and the CVS were calibrated, maintained and operated in accordance with
the manufacturer's instructions and the appropriate sections o
Code of Federal Regulations applicable to light-duty vehicles.
In addition to the 142 m3/min (5000 cfm) cooling fan placed in
front of the automobile, 42 m /min (1500 cfm) blowers were available
to cool each rear wheel. These additional blowers were used only
during the HFET driving cycle.
D. Exhaust Sampling and Analysis
A pictorial schematic of the exhaust and sampling system is shown
in Figure 3. This system is in accordance with the guidelines estab-
lished in previous unregulated emission projects conducted at SwRI for
the EPA. The primary feature of this system is the number of sampling
probes and systems required to collect all of the required unregulated
emission samples. This is illustrated in the several views of the
system shown in Figure 2.
This section has described the dilution tunnel and provided some
insight into the overall sampling system assembly. More details on
each of the individual sampling systems for the unregulated emissions
are given in Section III.
E. Instrumentation for Regulated Emissions and Engine Parameters
Bagged samples of the dilute exhaust were evaluated for HC, CO,
NOX, and CO2 using SwRI Bag Cart Number 1. This bag cart was designed,
calibrated and operated in accordance with the appropriate sections of
the Code of Federal Regulations applicable to light-duty vehicles.'''
In addition, the vehicle speed and the oxygen level in the undiluted
exhaust were continuously recorded. The instrumentation used for these
continuously recorded data were as follows:
Parameter Instrument or Method
Measured Type Make S Model Ranges Used
C>2 Polarographic Beckman 715 5 & 25%
Speed Parallel output from the Dynamometer Controls
The average oxygen level in the undiluted exhaust was obtained, by
integration of the continuous oxygen signal, using an Acromag 1324-LY-l
integrator. The average oxygen level has only a gross relative meaning
for most of these evaluations. Often, the oxygen level was relatively
high when the exhaust flow was low (e.g., idle and cut-throttle) and
relatively low when the exhaust flow was relatively high (e.g., highway
speed). The integration of the oxygen in the undiluted exhaust does
not compensate for these changes in exhaust flow. Is is possible to
-------
(Bags)
HC, CO, .NOx, C02
Individual HC, N20
Exhaust
Out
AP Control
Orifice
CVS
Constant
Volume
Sampler
(Filters)
Particulate
Metals and Other Elements
Filtered
Air In
460 mm (18")I.D.
Orifice Mixing
Plate
Oxygen •*•=
(Traps and Impingers)
COS + Sulfides
HCN
Amines
Ammonia
Aldehydes & Ketones
Hydrogen Sulfide
Exhaust
from
Automobile
Figure 3. Gasoline engine emissions sampling system.
-------
have a substantial average oxygen level and yet be deficient in
oxygen over some portions of the driving cycle.
F. Emissions Test Procedures
The primary procedures and driving schedules utilized in this pro-
ject are defined as follows:
FTP - 1979 Federal Test Procedure'7'
(uses the Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedule)
HFET - Highway Fuel Economy Driving Schedule^8'
Each of the two primary procedures and schedules, requiring emissions
testing in this project (FTP and HFET), utilized bagged samples for
evaluation of regulated emissions and fuel consumption. In addition,
evaluation of the regulated emissions were conducted using several
short-test procedures. These short-test procedures are discussed in
Section II-H.
The HFET is a hot-start, single-segment driving cycle. The FTP,
however, involves cold-start and hot-start, multi-cycle with multi-
segement operation. In addition, in this project, a four-bag FTP was
utilized for most of the unregulated emissions, rather than the three-
bag FTP specified in the Federal Test Procedure. Therefore, before
proceeding, it is important to clarify the meaning of FTP as used in
this project.
FTP - The FTP uses the Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedules (UDDS)
which is 1372 seconds in duration. The UDDS, in turn, is divided into
two segments; a "transient" phase of 505 seconds and a "stabilized"
phase of 867 seconds. The 1975 Federal Test Procedure consists of
cold start "transient" and "stabilized" phases, followed by a hot start
"transient". In this project, the hot start "transient" was followed
by a hot start "stabilized". For the remainder of this discussion, and
throughout this report, the four-cycle FTP will be identified as pre-
sented in Table 3. Therefore, with the assumption that the changes in
distance traveled are negligible, the composite results with the four-
cycle FTP relative to results with the three-cycle FTP will differ
only as the mass emissions emitted during Cycle 4 differ from those
emitted during Cycle 2. For the regulated emissions, the differences
during Cycles 2 and 4 were small, and the overall effects of such dif-
ferences were essentially negligible.
The test sequence followed for each automobile is given in Table
4. The sequence followed in the laboratory for running one set of
emissions tests (FTP and HFET) is given in Table 5.
10
-------
TABLE 3. DESCRIPTION OF FOUR-CYCLE FTP
Four-Cycle FTP
Cold UDDS Hot UDDS
Cycle 12 34
Duration, seconds 505 867 505 867
Regulated Emissions, 3-Bag XX X
Regulated Emissions, 4-Bag XX XX
Unregulated Emissions:
Bag XX XX
Impinger X X
Trap X X
NOTE: X designates a sample taken
A composite value in mass per distance for the three-cycle, three sample
FTP regulated emissions is calculated using the following formula:
MASS _ 0.43 x (MASS 1 + MASS 2) 0.57 x (MASS 3 + MASS 2)
DISTANCE " (DIST. 1 + DIST. 2) + (DIST. 3 + DIST. 2)
Since the same driving cycle is involved, Distance 3 is essentially equal
to Distance 1, and this equation can be reduced to:
0.43 x (Ml + M2) + 0.57 x (M3 + M2)
3-FTP M/D = nTTm
For the four-cycle FTP, two sample, composite values determined in this
project, the following formula was used:
MASS _ 0.43 x M(l + 2) + 0.57 x M(3 + 4)
DISTANCE ~ (Dl + D2) (D3 + D4)
Since Distance 3 is equal to Distance 1 and Distance 4 is equal to
Distance 2, this equation can be reduced to:
0.43 x M(! +2) + 0.57 x M(3 +4)
4-FTP M/D - Dl + D2
11
-------
TABLE 4. TEST SEQUENCE FOR EACH AUTOMOBILE
Sequence Operation Performed on Vehicle
Upon receipt Drain and fill with test fuel, install and leak-
check exhaust adapter
1 Run FTP, HFET - Sample and analyze emissions
2 Run FTP, HFET - Sample and analyze emissions
3 Run I/M Short tests
4 Tune up the engine. If any adjustments (other
than up to 10% change in idle speed) or parts
replacement are required, continue.
5 Run FTP, HFET - Sample and analyze emissions
6 Run FTP, HFET - Sample and analyze emissions
7 Run I/M Short tests
8 Fill with fuel and return to owner
FTP - Federal Test Procedure
HFET - Highway Fuel Economy Driving Schedule
TABLE 5. LABORATORY TEST SEQUENCE
1. Precondition, UDDS
2. Soak 12 to 20 hours
3. FTP - 4 bags for gaseous emissions
2 filters or impinger samples
4. Engine Off - 10 minutes - Fan Off
5. HFET - 1 bag sample
1 filter or impinger sample
NOTE: 5000 cfm fan on during all car
operation. Additional tire and
fuel tank cooling blowers on
during all HFET operation.
12
-------
The parameters of the two primary driving schedules are summarized
in Table 6 and these schedules are illustrated in Figure 4. Other
driving schedule designations frequently used are as follows:
Driving Schedule Other Common
Designation Used Designations
FTP LA-4 and UDDS
HFET FET
TABLE 6. SUMMARY OF DRIVING SCHEDULE PARAMETERS
Duration, Distance, Average Speed
Schedule Seconds Kilometers km/hr mph
FTP:
505 505 5.8
867 867 6.2
UDDS 1372 12.0 31.4 19.5
HFET 765 16.5 77.6 48.2
G. Test Numbering System
The numbering system used in this project consists of three digits
plus a cycle abbreviation. The designation used for all automobile
testing was "WT," followed by the individual test cycle abbreviation
FTP or FET. The meaning of each letter is described as follows:
As Used in
Code Description This Project
W Vehicle designation 01 thru 10
T Test Series - As Received 1 and 2*
- After Tune-up 6 and 7**
*1 and 2 are the initial and repeat test series for the vehicle as
received,
**6 and 7 are the initial and repeat test series for the vehicle after
tune-up. In one or two special cases, a higher number was used to
designate a rerun.
13
-------
100
80
.c 60
\
g
•* 40
20
0
60
.TRANSIENT
PHASE
STABILIZED
PHASE
200
400
600 800
TIME, sec
1000
1200
1371
100
80
60
40
20
0
. e,
200
400
TIME, sec
600
765
Figure 4. Driving cycle speed vs time traces
14
-------
H. Short-Test Procedures
Regulated emissions were also evaluated over several I/M short-
test procedures. These procedures are described by the data sheet in
Appendix A-l, and are listed as follows:
• 50 mph Cruise Test
• 4-Mode Idle Tests
• Loaded 2-Mode Test
• Propane Gain Checks
All of these short-test procedures were conducted with the engine in a
warmed-up operating condition. HC and CO emissions were measured in all,
except the propane gain checks. The propane gain checks involved deter-
mination of change in engine idle speed as propane was inducted into
the intake of the engine.
I. Computational Methods
The methods used for calculating the unregulated emissions results
are given in Appendix A-2. All regulated emissions were calculated
using the methods prescribed in the Code of Federal Regulations for
Light-Duty Vehicles. ' ' On the computer printouts for the regulated
emissions (Appendix D), all items of potential interest are identified
by descriptive headings. Items on the computer sheet identified only
by abbreviated headings are used in calculating the unregulated
emissions.
15
-------
III. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES FOR UNREGULATED EMISSIONS
The analytical procedures used to measure the unregulated emissions
are summarized in this section. Detailed descriptions of most of
the procedures, along with discussions of their development, validation,
and qualification, are available in Interim Report II, "Analytical
Procedures for Characterizing Unregulated Pollutant Emissions From
Motor Vehicles," developed in a related EPA Project.(6)
A. Description of the Analytical Procedures
The unregulated emissions evaluated in this project, along with the
methods for sampling and the procedures used in the analyses, are listed
in Table 7. Organic amines, aldehydes and ketones, organic sulfides,
individual hydrocarbons, and metals and other elements represent groups
of compounds. The respective procedures separate and identify a number
of individual components within each of these groups. The analytical
procedures involved in this project are briefly described as follows:
Organic Amines - The collection of organic amines (monomethylamine,
monoethylamine and dimethylamines, trimethylamines, diethylamine, and
triethylamine) is accomplished by bubbling CVS-diluted exhaust through
glass impingers containing dilute sulfuric acid. The amines are com-
plexed by the acid to form stable sulfate salts which remain in solu-
tion. A portion of this solution is then injected into a gas chromato-
graph- equipped with an ascarite loaded pre-column and a nitrogen-phos-
phorus detector (NPD). External amine standards in dilute sulfuric acid
are used to quantify the results.
Ammonia - Ammonia in CVS diluted automotive exhaust is measured in
the protonated form, NH4+, after collection in dilute 1^304. The acidi-
fication is carried out in a glass impinger maintained at ice bath tem-
perature. A sample from the impinger is then analyzed for ammonia in
an Ion Chromatograph and the concentration in the exhaust is calculated
by comparison to an ammonium sulfate standard solution.
Aldehydes and Ketones - The collection of aldehydes (formalde-
hyde, acetaldehyde, isobutyraldehyde and hexanaldehyde) and ketones
(acetone and methylethyIketone) is accomplished by bubbling CVS diluted
exhaust through glass impingers containing 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine
(DNPH) in dilute hydrochloric acid. The aldehydes and ketones (also
known as carbonyl compounds) react with the DNPH to form their respec-
tive phenylhydrazone derivatives. These derivatives are insoluble or
only slightly soluble in the DNPH/HC1 solution and are removed by
filtration followed by pentane extractions. The filtered precipitate
and the pentane extracts are combined and then the pentane is evap-
orated in a vacuum oven. The remaining dried extract contains the
phenylhydrazone derivatives. The extract is dissolved in a quantita-
tive volume of toluene containing a known amount of anthracene as an
internal standard. A portion of this dissolved extract is injected
into a gas Chromatograph and analyzed for several individual aldehydes
17
-------
TABLE 7. SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY FOR UNREGULATED EMISSIONS
Compound
Organic Amines
Ammonia (NH3)
Aldehydes & Ketones
Sampling
Impinger
Impinger
Impinger
Method of Analysis
Hydrogen Sulfide (I^S) Impinger
Total Cyanide [Hydrogen Impinger
Cyanide (HCN) and
Cyanogen (C2N2)]
Carbonyl Sulfide (COS) Trap
and Organic Sulfides
Individual Hydrocarbons Bag
Metals and Other Filter
Elements
Particulates Filter
Nitrous Oxide Bag
Gas Chromatograph with ascarite
precolumn and nitrogen-phosphorus
detector (GC-NPD).
Ion Chromatograph.
Dinitrophenylhydrazone derivative.
Gas Chromatograph with flame
ionization detector (GC-FID)-
Methylene blue derivative.
Spectrophotometer.
Cyanogen chloride derivative. Gas
Chromatograph with electron capture
detector (GC-ECD).
Gas Chromatograph with flame
photometric detector (GC-FPD).
Gas Chromatograph with flame
ionization detector (GC-FID).
Weighed using microbalance.
Spectral X-ray analysis at RTP.
Weighed using microbalance.
Gas Chromatograph with electron
capture detector (GC-ECD).
18
-------
and ketones using a flame ionization detector.
Hydrogen Sulfide - The collection of hydrogen sulfide is accom-
plished by bubbling CVS diluted exhaust through glass impingers con-
taining a buffered zinc acetate solution which traps the sulfide ion
as zinc sulfide. The absorbing solution is then treated with N,N-di-
methyl-paraphenylene diamine sulfate and ferric ammonium sulfate.
Cyclization occurs, forming the highly colored heterocyclic compound
methylene blue (3,9-bisdimethyl-aminophenazothionium sulfate). The
resulting solution is analyzed with a spectrophotometer at 667 nm
i-n a 1-cm or 4-cm pathlength cell, depending upon the concentration.
Total Cyanide (Hydrogen Cyanide plus Cyanogen) - The collection
of total cyanide is accomplished by bubbling CVS-diluted exhaust
through glass impingers containing a 1.0 N potassium hydroxide ab-
sorbing solution. This solution is maintained at ice bath temperature.
An aliquot of the absorbing reagent is then treated with KH2PC>4 and
Chloramine-T. A portion of the resulting cyanogen chloride is injected
into a gas chromatograph equipped with an electron capture detector
(ECD). External CN~ standards are used to quantify the results.
Carbonyl and Organic Sulfides - The collection of carbonyl sul-
fide (COS) and the organic sulfides methyl sulfide (dimethysulfide,
(CH3)2S), ethyl sulfide (diethylsulfide, (C2H5)2S) and methyl disul-
fide (dimethyldisulfide, (^3)282)? is accomplished by passing CVS-
diluted exhaust through Tenax GC traps at -76°C. At this temperature
the traps remove the organic sulfides from the dilute exhaust. The
organic sulfides are thermally desorbed from the traps into a gas
chromatograph sampling system and injected into a gas chromatograph
equipped with a flame photometric detector for analysis. External
organic sulfide standards generated from permeation tubes are used to
quantify the results.
Individual Hydrocarbons - For measurement of selected individual
hydrocarbons, methane (CH4) , ethane ^2%) , ethylene (C2H4) , acetylene
(C2H2)i propane (C3H8), propylene (C3H6), benzene (C6H6), and toluene
(CyH8), a sample of CVS-diluted exhaust is collected in a Tedlar bag.
This bagged sample is then analyzed for individual hydrocarbons using
a gas chromatographic system containing four separate columns and a
flame ionization detector. The peak areas are compared to an external
calibration blend and the individual hydrocarbon concentrations are
obtained using a Hewlett-Packard 3354 computer system.
Metals and Other Elements - The metals are collected as particulate
on a 47 mm Fluoropore filter, which is then sent to Research Triangle
Park (RTP) for analysis by X-ray spectroscopy. The diluted exhaust
sample is taken from within the dilution tunnel. Weight gain on the
filter is determined by weighing the filter on a microbalance before
and after sampling.
19
-------
Particulate - The "particulate" is collected on a 47 mm glass
fiber filter. The amount of "particulate" collected is determined
by weighing the filter on a microbalance before and after sampling.
Nitrous Oxide - For measurement of nitrous oxide, a sample of the
CVS-diluted exhaust is collected in a Tedlar bag. This bagged sample
is then analyzed for nitrous oxide using a gas chromatograph equipped
with an electron capture detector. Calibration blends are used to
quantify the results. Gas Chromatograph peak areas are obtained using
a Hewlett-Packard 3354 computer system.
B. Validation and Qualification of the Analytical Procedures
The analytical procedures used in this project were subjected to
a series of validation and qualification experiements in previous
projects. Validation experiments included checks for sample stabil-
ity, sample collection efficiency, detector linearity, interferences,
and analysis repeatability. Qualification experiments included the
injection of the compound of interest into the tunnel with and without
the presence of exhaust and the subsequent recovery of that compound
at the procedure sampling point.
Sample stability checks were performed using repeated analyses
of the same sample at intervals over a specified period of time and
comparing the results to the initial analysis. Organic amines,
aldehydes and ketones, ammonia, total cyanide, nitrous oxide and in-
dividual hydrocarbon samples were found to be stable for several days.
Carbonyl and organic sulfides and the hydrogen sulfide samples were
found to be stable for approximately one day.
Sample collection efficiency experiments were performed by passing
a known concentration of sample through a series of impingers or traps
and analyzing each impinger or trap individually for the compound of
interest. All of these procedures used in this project had a col-
lection efficiency of 98% or better. Detector linearity experiments
were performed by preparing several samples of various known concentra-
tions and plotting the resulting peak areas versus the concentrations.
The procedures had linear response over the range of interest in this
project.
To determine interferences from other compounds, for each procedure,
known exhaust components were introduced into the sample to determine
their effect on the resultant measurements. To determine analysis
repeatability, several samples of known concentrations were prepared
and a number of complete analyses were performed at each concentration.
The results of these tests were then compared to determine analyses
repeatability.
The qualification experiments were performed to determine if the
compounds of interest could travel the length of the dilution tunnel in
the presence of dilute exhaust without significant loss by reaction
20
-------
with exhaust or the tunnel itself. The compounds were introduced at
the same point at which the exhaust enters the tunnel and were sampled
at the normal sampling point. Table 8 lists the procedures for which
validation and qualification experiments have been performed.
C. Accuracy of the Analytical Procedures
A difficult, but very important, endeavor was the determination
of procedural accuracy for each analytical method. The primary dif-
ficulty involved those procedures in which the exhaust compounds are
trapped or absorbed, an extraction or subsequent reaction is performed,
and then a portion of the extraction is analyzed. After much consid-
eration, in previous unregulated emission projects, the decision was
reached to initially define the accuracy in terms of a "minimum detec-
tion value" (MDV). The MDV, as used in this report, is defined as the
value above which it can be said that the compound has been detected
in the exhaust (i.e., at a measured value equal to the MDV, the accu-
racy is equal to plus or minus the MDV). Determination of accuracy
over the entire range of each procedure was beyond the scope of these
projects.
For compounds collected by bag samples, the MDV was determined
from the instrument detection limits only, and is independent of the
sampling rate and duration. For compounds which are concentrated in
impingers or traps, the MDV is dependent on the instrument detection
limit, chemical workup, sampling rate and sampling duration. The MDV's
listed in Table 9 were derived using the listed sampling rate and a
23-minute sampling period.
21
-------
TABLE 8. PROCEDURAL VALIDATION AND QUALIFICATION
Validation
Compound or Compound Group Conducted
Organic Amines Yes
Ammonia Yes
Aldehydes & Ketones Yes
Hydrogen Sulfide Yes
Total Cyanide Yes
Carbonyl Sulfide and Yes
Organic Sulfides
Individual Hydrocarbons Yes
Metals and Other Elements Noa
Particulates Noa
Nitrous Oxide Yes
Established procedure
Qualification Conducted
Yes (significant tunnel losses)
Yes (significant tunnel losses)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes (significant tunnel losses)
Noa
Noa
Noa
Yes
22
-------
TABLE 9. EMISSION PROCEDURAL SAMPLE RATES AND ACCURACY
Test Number,
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature
WT
mm HG
g/kg
°C
Mol.
Weight
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen
Catalyst Avg. Temp., °c
Catalyst Max. Temp., °C
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., H/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC)
Carbon Monoxide
Oxides of Nitrogen
Particulates
Total Particulates
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
32.00
44.01
11.88
28.01
46.01
Sample
Flow
Vioo
Bag
Bag
Bag
Bag
14.0
4.0
Bag
0.13
4.0
575
1165
1915
Procedural
Minimum
Detection
Valuesa
ppm
1.0C
2.0C
0.5C
575
2330
958
<50
MDV
for
FTP
mg/km"
10
40
16
<1
-0.05
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
17.03
26.02
34.08
44.02
4.0
4.0
4.0
Bag
710
1080
1415
1830
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
7
11
14
18
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.3
aBased on a 23-minute sampling period at the specified flow rate for all
impinger, filter and trap collected samples.
bBased on l_lg/m3 in the diluted exhaust and typical UDDS (FTP 505 and 867)
parameters (1372 seconds, 206 m3 CVS flow, 12.07 km, 0.98 DSFC).
°Basedonthe lowest instrument ranges used in this project.
23
-------
TABLE 9 (Cont'd). EMISSION PROCEDURAL SAMPLE RATES AND ACCURACY
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone6
Methylethylketone
Hexana Idehyde
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Mol.
Weight
30.03
44.05
58.08
72.12
100.16
16.04
28.05
30.07
26.04
44.11
42.08
78.12
92.15
CRCd
Synonym
—
—
2-Propanone
2-Butanone
Hexanal
—
Ethene
—
Ethyne
—
Propene
—
—
yg/m3
per
ppm
1250
1830
2415
3000
4165
665
1165
1250
1085
1835
1750
3245
3830
Procedural
Minimum
Detection
Values3
. EEE
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
yg/m3
15
20
25
30
40
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
MDV
for
FTP
mg/kmb
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
60.08
62.13
90.19
94.20
—
Dimethyl
Diethyl
Dimethyl
2500
2585
3750
3915
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.001
3
3
4
4
0.04
0.04
0.06
0.06
31.06 Amino-Methane 1290 0.002 3
45.09 Amino-Ethane 1875 0.002 4
59.11 -- 2460 0.002 5
73.14 — 3040 0.002 6
101.19 — 4205 0.002 8
0.05
0.05
0.08
0.10
0.14
a &
initial page of this table.
Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 54th Edition.
Includes Acrolein - 56.07 and Propionaldehyde - 58.08 (CRC - Propenal
and Propanal, respectively).
Includes Dimethylamine - 45.09.
24
-------
IV. CAR SELECTION AND TESTING
Regulated and unregulated exhaust emissions were measured for ten
high mileage catalyst equipped cars. The cars were tested as-received
and after a tune-up to the manufacturers specifications. This section
describes the selection and evaluation of the cars and presents the
test results.
A. Car Selection
The cars tested in this program (Table 10) were either rented
locally, tested in previous EPA projects, or were owned by Southwest
Research Center (SwRI or SFRE) employees. The criteria for car selec-
tion were established in the project "Scope of Work" as follows:
Vehicles should have an odometer reading of about 50,000 miles.
Vehicles should be selected, if possible from engine and catalyst
configurations evaluated at low mileage in previous EPA projects
(EPA Report Nos. 460/3-80-003, -004, -005).
The cars that were evaluated in the previous EPA projects came
equipped with pelleted and monolithic oxidation catalysts, three-way
catalysts and three-way plus oxidation catalysts. These cars are
listed below:
Engine
Car CID/Cyl Catalyst
1978 Chevrolet Malibu 305/8 Oxi(Pelleted)
1978 Chevrolet Malibu 305/8 Oxi(Pelleted)
(Calf. Cert.)
1978 Ford Granada 302/8 Oxi(Monolith)
1978 Ford Mustang 302/8 Oxi(Monolith)
1978 Ford Pinto 140/4 3-way + Oxi
(Calf. Cert.)
1978 Pontiac Sunbird 151/4 3-way
1978 Saab 99 121/4 3-way
1979 Mercury Marquis 351/8 3-way + Oxi
Considerable effort was expended during the project to locate the
cars previously tested in the malfunction projects. All of the cars
located had considerably less than 50,000 miles on the odometer, in-
cluding the California certified Chevrolet Malibu. However, since the
Malibu was California certified with an air pump and was evaluated in
a previous malfunction project, it was selected by the EPA Project
Officer for inclusion in this project although it only had 37,600 miles
on the odometer.
25
-------
TABLE 10. CARS SELECTED FOR TESTING
Car
No.
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
Car
1978 Buick Regal
1979 Mercury Marquis
1979 Mercury Marquis
1978 Ford Granada
1978 Volvo 245 DL
1978 Oldsmobile Cutlass
1978 Chevrolet Malibu
1978 Chev. Monte Carlo
1978 Ford Fiesta
1978 Chrysler New Yorker
Engine
CID/Cyl
305/8
351/8
351/8
302/8
130/4
231/6
305/8
321/6
98/4
400/8
Catalyst
oxidation
3-Way
3-Way
oxidation
3-Way
oxidation
oxidation
oxidation
oxidation
oxidation
Mileage
54,500
46,500
48,800
57,000
59,000
47,300
37,600
67,500
68,000
66,000
Comment
SFRE Employee
Owned
Rented Locally
Rented Locally
Rented Locally
SwRI Employee
Owned
SwRI Employee
Owned
Calif. Cert. ,
Tested Previously
in Contract
68-03-2499
SwRI Employee
Owned
SwRI Employee
Owned
SFRE Employee
Owned
26
-------
The majority of the cars tested in the program were owned by
Southwest Research Center employees. A memorandum was sent to each of
the over two thousand Southwest Research Center (SwRI and SFRE)
employees to determine the availability of staff-owned cars for use
in the project. A copy of the memorandum is included in Appendix
A-3. Out of a total of thirty-nine replies, twenty-five were selected
for further consideration. Six of the SwRI and SFRE employee-owned
cars were selected for testing. The remaining three cars tested in
the program, two Mercury Marquis and a Ford Granada, were rented from
local leasing agencies or car dealers. Three of the these nine cars
had slightly less than 50,000 miles on the odometer.
An effort was also made to obtain cars from California. Contacts
primarily included rental agencies and car dealerships. Rental agencies
generally no longer had any 1978 (or 1979) model year cars. The car
dealerships and other contacts expressed complete lack of interest.
It became apparent that the effort required to obtain cars from
California would greatly exceed the proposed scope of the project. In
addition, with the inclusion of the California Chevrolet Malibu with
an air pump, and the Mercury Marquis and the Volvo with three-way
catalysts, most types of emissions systems that were on the previously
tested California cars were available for testing in this project.
Before a candidate car was selected for testing in the project,
the following items were checked:
• Condition of engine - If any extensive maintenance
was required, the car was not selected.
• Use of only unleaded fuel - Information from owner
and from a tailpipe check using Plumbtesmo lead-
sensitive paper. If a positive lead test was ob-
tained, the car was not selected for testing.
In addition to meeting all of the specified requirements, the approval
of the EPA Project Officer was obtained prior to final acceptance of
each car.
B. Car Testing
Initially, the cars were to be tested in duplicate after draining
the as-received fuel and performing any necessary maintenance or ad-
justments. However, after testing the 1978 Buick Regal, the number and
sequence of the tests performed on each car was altered. The Buick
Regal was in exceptionally good condition and the engine was well main-
tained. Except for a little higher than specified idle speed, the
engine met all normal tune-up requirements. The FTP HC and CO emissions
for this car, however, were relatively high as shown by the following
test results:
27
-------
Fuel
Test Emissions, g/km &/100 km
Oil FTP 1.16 15.8 0.93 14.0
012 FTP 0.95 13.3 0.95 13.9
Oil FET 0.18 0.7 0.92 9.7
012 FET 0.18 0.6 0.85 9.5
In Table 11, the average of the FTP emissions results for the
Regal are compared to the standards and the results from previous
studies. The FTP emissions values on the Regal appear to be more in
line with those values previously obtained on the noncatalyst Pacer,
than those on the Malibu.
These results raised a number of questions which were discussed
with the EPA Project Officer. Some of the primary factors were as
follows:
The car, as received, met all of the manufacturer's in-service,
tune-up requirements, except for idle speed. Idle speed was
a little high; apparently to achieve better idle quality.
The idle-mixture adjusting screws were set maximum-rich,
within the limit of the stops. This also was apparently done
to improve idle quality. (At the specified idle speed and
the new car idle mixture settings, the idle quality was
somewhat undesirably rough).
This idle-mixture setting was within the manufacturer's
specifications and is probably representative of dealer
inservice settings, based on the deterioration of idle
quality at leaner mixture setting.
In accordance with instructions from the EPA Project Officer, all
subsequent cars (Cars 2 through 10) were tested using the following
test plan:
1. Duplicate tests on cars as-received.
2. Tune-up the engine (Scope of the tune-up is described
in Appendix A-4).
3. If any adjustments (other than an up to 10% change in
idle speed) or parts replacement are required, run an
additional set of duplicate tests.
28
-------
TABLE 11. CAR 01 EMISSIONS SUMMARY
Emissions, g/km
Car
FTP
01
12
—
11
121RBIa
HFET
01 Avg.
12 Avg.
121RBIa
Description
1978 Buick Regal
1978 Chevrolet Malibu
1978 Standards (or Cert.)
1978 AMC Pacer
1978 Chevrolet Malibu
1978 Buick Regal
1978 Chevrolet Malibu
1978 Chevrolet Malibu
HC
1.06
0.31
0.93
0.73
1.08
0.18
0.03
0.10
CO
14.6
5.5
9.3
11.1
26.0
0.67
0.49
1.98
NOX
0.94
0.75
1.24
1.21
0.57
0.89
1.02
1.11
VlOO km
14.0
13.7
(13.8)
—
14.7
9.6
9.5
9.8
Car
01
12
121RBIa
11
HC Emissions, grams
Bag 1
11.7
6.8
9.7
6.5
Bag 2
6.0
0.3
6.6
3.4
Bag 3
3.0
0.8
3.6
4.2
Bag 4
2.9
0.2
5.9
3.2
CO Emissions, grams
Bag 1
260
130
230
144
Bag 2
54
3
170
50
Bag 3
19b
13b
72b
34
Bag 4
19b
1*
136b
35
aRich Best Idle fuel/air mixture setting.
bThe relationship of these Bag 3 and Bag 4 CO results show that idle
mixture setting was not the cause of the relatively high CO emissions
in the FTP with Car 01.
29
-------
The number of tests performed in the project is summarized as follows:
After Tune-up
Tests
Car
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
As Received
Tests
2a
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
lb
2
2
2
2
aSince the Buick Regal met all tune-up requirements,
the two tests conducted were designated as-received tests.
^Carburetor was out of adjustment during second test. The
test was not repeated as the first test after tune-up
gave emissions similar to the as-received tests.
°First run after tune-up very similar to as-received
emission rates, therefore test not repeated.
The tune-up adjustments and part replacements that were performed
on Cars 03 through 10 are summarized in Table 12. Car 02, a 1979
Mercury Marquis did not require any significant adjustments or part
replacements during tune-ups. The most common adjustment required was
idle rpm. Part replacements included plugs, plug wires, air filters,
EGR valves, a rotor, a distributor cap, and miscellaneous vacuum lines.
C. Regulated and Unregulated Emission Test Results
Summaries of the test results are included in Appendix B. Indi-
vidual sample data for the FTP evaluations are included in Appendix C
and the computer printouts for the regulated emissions are included
in Appendix D. The analyses and discussion of these test results are
included in Section V of this report. All FTP unregulated emissions
data are based on appropriately weighted four-cycle FTP results. In
the data tables, a double dash (—) has been used when no test data
were available. This occurs for unregulated emissions when valid test
data could not be obtained due to instrument malfunction or loss of the
sample.
D. I/M Short-Test Procedure Results
Each car was evaluated over four short-tests after each set of as-
received and after tune-up tests. Three of the short-tests involved
30
-------
TABLE 12. SUMMARY OF TUNEUP ADJUSTMENTS AND PART REPLACEMENTS (CARS 3-10)
Car No.
Adjustment Required
Idle RPM
Ignition Timing
Idle CO%
Choke
Parts Replaced
Plugs
Air Filter
Plug Wires
EGR
Other
03
8% High
v/
V
a
04
12% High
/
05
17% High
0.6% High
/
06
13% High
»/
v/
b,c,d
07
26% High
/
/
08
6° Low
/
/
/
e
09
14% Low
/
/f
10
13% High
4° High
•
g,h
Vacuum lines to temperature switch in the air cleaner reversed
Line to EGR was plugged with sawed off top portion of a spark plug; line was connected
properly and unbroken otherwise
Vacuum line from base of carburetor to vacuum canister broken
NO. 1 plug loose
g
J?CV hose split, replaced
EGR port on the intake manifold was plugged with carbon deposits, EGR
was functioning but was replaced because of excessive carbon deposits
^Several brittle vacuum lines replaced
Replaced rotor and distributor cap
-------
measurement of HC and CO under steady state operating conditions. The
other short test involved determination of maximum engine speed at idle
with propane injection into the intake of the engine. The HC and CO
emissions analyzers used are in a Beckman cart which was initially de-
signed for and used in nine-mode heavy-duty engine evaluations. HC was
measured as ppm Hexane.
The results of the short-test evaluations are reported in Appendix
E and are summarized in Table 13. The larger increase in engine rpm,
with propane enrichment after tune-up, reflects the fact that most of
the cars were running slightly rich as received. Car 08, however, was
adjusted extremely lean as received. With the exception of Car 10, the
HC and CO values did not change significantly after tune-up. There was
a significant decrease in idle CO and all HC values after the tune-up
of Car 10.
32
-------
TABLE 13. SUMMARY OF I/M SHORT TEST RESULTS
Undiluted Exhaust Emissions
Car 01
Idle
2500 rpm
30 mph
50 mph
Car 02
Idle
2500 rpm
30 mph
50 mph
Car 03
Idle
2500 rpm
30 mph
50 mph
Car 04
Idle
2500 rpm
30 mph
50 mph
Car 05
Idle
2500 rpm
30 mph
50 mph
Car 06
Idle
2500 rpm
30 mph
50 mph
Car 07
Idle
2500 rpm
30 mph
50 mph
HC Emissions ,
As-Received
74
67
83
68
90
67
91
73
179
98
116
63
97
102
221
82
95
75
82
62
64
60
69
73
69
64
67
60
ppm Hexane
After Tune+^up
209
93
130
58
109
198
175
82
91
84
82
69
71
64
60
62
138
152
84
67
CO Emissions
As-Received
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.01
0.06
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.86
0.27
0.29
0.01
0.02
0.05
0.02
0.01
0.18
0.17
0.07
0.02
0.01
0.07
0.01
0.05
0.06
0.02
0.09
0.01
, Percent
After Tune^up
0.78
0.26
0.36
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.07
0.07
0.05
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.03
33
-------
TABLE 13 (Cont'd). SUMMARY OF I/M SHORT TEST RESULTS
Undiluted Exhaust Emissions
Car 08
Idle
2500 rpm
30 mph
50 mph
Car 09
Idle
2500 rpm
30 mph
50 mph
Car 10
Idle
2500 rpm
30 mph
50 mph
HC Emissions,
As-Received
95
56
58
64
249
102
221
109
483+
483+
483+
483+
ppm Hexane
After Tune-up
92
89
67
60
326
152
134
107
109
107
100
64
CO Emissions
As-tReceiVed
0.04
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.56
0.03
0.03
0.00
0.69
0.16
0.14
0.0.2
, Percent
After Tune*- up
0.02
0.48
0.01
0.02
0.42
0.10
0.06
0.00
0.07
0.03
0.17
0.02
Idle Propane Enrichment,
rpm Increase
Car
Gear
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
Neutral
Neutral
Neutral
Neutral
Neutral
Neutral
Neutral
Neutral
Neutral
Neutral
Drive
Drive
Drive
Drive
Drive
Drive
Drive
Drive
Drive
Drive
As-Received
60
40
10
210
200
130
20
630
15
0
10
0
0
30
NA
20
0
130
NA
0
After Tune-up
10
300
240
230
170
280
40
90
0
50
NA
55
65
35
NA
20
34
-------
V. ANALYSES OF THE RESULTS
This section reports the analyses performed on the emissions data
generated in the project. The Analyses involved averaging and refor-
matting to enable making various comparisons of the data. Due to the
very limited number of data points for each emission at each specific
condition, advanced statistical analyses were judged to be inapplicable.
In addition to presenting the data in formats that enable ready review
and comparison, these results are also compared with results obtained
in several previous related projects.
A Regulated Emissions and Fuel Consumption
The initial analyses of the data involved averaging the results
for the duplicate as-received and for the duplicate after tune-up
tests. These averages are given in Appendix F. A summary of the aver-
age regulated emissions and fuel consumption data is presented in
Table 14.
Comparisons of the after tune-up emissions and fuel consumption
with the corresponding as-received emissions and fuel consumption, for
cars 03 through 10, are presented in Table 15. Cars 01 and 02 required
little or no tune-up, therefore the as-received and after tune-up
emissions and fuel consumption were essentially identical. Numbers
less than one in Table 15 indicate a decrease in emissions and fuel
consumption after tune-up. As shown in Table 15, cars 06, 08, and 10
gave the most significant changes in regulated emissions. Cars 06
and 08 had malfunctioning EGR valves which apparently caused high NOX
emission rates. Car 08 was also running extremely lean as-received.
After replacement of the EGR valve, both cars had an approximate 70
percent decrease in the NOX emission rates. In car 08, the hydrocarbon
and carbon monoxide emission rates increased after tune-up; but the
as-received emission rates were much lower than those for car 06 which
had identical emission control devices and engine size. Both cars had
similar emission rates after tune-up. Car 10 was running rich as-
received and required a rotor and distributor cap replacement. Car 10,
as-received, also had the highest hydrocarbon, carbon monoxide, and NOX
emission rates of the cars tested. The hydrocarbon, carbon monoxide,
and NOX emission rates were all lower after tune-up. Car tune-ups
resulted in decreases in FTP carbon monoxide emission rates and fuel
consumption for several of the ten cars.
Nine of the ten cars tested as-received in the program had one or
more regulated emissions which exceeded the emission standards they
were designed to meet. After tune-up, seven of the cars still had one
or more emissions which exceeded the emission standards. The ratios
of the as-received and after tune-up regulated emissions to the emission
standards are presented in Table 16. This table indicates which cars
had emission rates that exceeded the emission standards. As-received,
five cars exceeded the hydrocarbon emission standard, three exceeded
the carbon monoxide emission standard, and five exceeded the NOX emission
35
-------
TABLE 14. SUMMARY OF THE AVERAGE REGULATED EMISSIONS AND FUEL CONSUMPTION DATA
FTP
Fuel Consumption
(VlOO km)
Car 01
Car 02
Car 03
Car 04
Car 05
Car 06
Car 07
Car 08
Car 09
w Car 10
CTi
Car 01
Car 02
Car 03
Car 04
Car 05
Car 06
Car 07
Car 08
Car 09
Car 10
HC
As-Rec1
1.06
0.43
0.43
1.08
0.38
0.54
0.40
0.28
0.40
2.84*
0.18
0.16
0.17
0.54
0.24
0.12
0.11
0.07
0.14
0.38*
(gAm)
After
d Tune -up
0.42
1.12*
0.38
0.48
0.41
0.52
0.34*
0.83
0.11
0.68*
0.24
0.10
0.13
0.14
0.10*
0.15
CO
As-Rec1
14.55
3.48
3.68
7.02
3.64
9.11
8.22
3.07
1.60
37.60*
0.67
0.29
1.59
2.47
1.54
0.86
1.45
0.16
0.11
2.33*
(gAm)
After
d Tune -up
2.41
5.61*
3.34
8.52
7.57
9.10
1.38*
10.15
HFET
0.40
1.79*
1.17
0.94
1.60
1.36
0.08*
0.67
NOX
As-Rec1
0.94
1.43
1.03
0.62
0.50
2.16
0.45
2.09
1.86
2.28*
0.89
1.27
1.56
0.68
0.29
2.93
0.37
2.57
2.08
1.49*
(gAm)
After
d Tune -up
1.07
0.67*
0.55
0.68
0.44
0.71
1.80*
1.88
1.43
0.77*
0.30
0.68
0.36
0.79
1.77*
1.23
As-Rec'd
13.95
16.64
17.25
18.68
13.21
12.42
16.83
12.78
7.73
19.32*
9.60
10.79
11.09
12.35
7.82
8.91
10.60
8.41
5.15
12.25*
After
Tune-up
16.50
18.32*
12.48
12.77
16.26
12.60
7.61*
17.93
10.68
12.36*
7.81
9.24
10.91
8.55
5.02*
11.97
*Only one test point
-------
TABLE 15. RATIO OF THE AFTER TUNE-UP REGULATED EMISSIONS
AND FUEL CONSUMPTION TO THE AS-RECEIVED REGULATED
EMISSIONS AND FUEL CONSUMPTION*
Car 03
Car 04
Car 05
Car 06
Car 07
Car 08
Car 09
Car 10
FTP (After Tune-up/As Received)
Hydrocarbons
0.98
1.04
1.00
0.83
1.03
1.86
0.85
0.29
Carbon
Monoxide
0.65
0.80
0.92
0.94
0.92
2.96
0.86
0.27
Oxides of
Nitrogen
1.04
1.08
1.10
0.31
0.98
0.34
0.97
0.82
Fuel
Consumption
0.96
0.98
0.94
1.03
0.97
0.99
0.98
0.93
HFET (After Tune-up/As Received)
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
Car
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
0
1
1
0
1
2
0
0
.65
.26
.00
.83
.18
.00
.71
.39
0.
0.
0.
1.
1.
8.
0.
0.
25
72
76
09
10
50
73
29
0.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
92
13
03
23
97
31
85
83
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
.96
.00
.00
.04
.03
.02
.97
.98
*Numbers less than one indicate an improvement in emissions and
fuel economy after car tune-up. Cars 1 and 2 required little
or no tune-up, therefore emissions were not evaluated after
tune-up.
37
-------
TABLE 16. RATIO OF THE AS-RECEIVED AND AFTER TUNE-UP
REGULATED EMISSIONS TO THE 1978 AND 1979
EMISSION STANDARDS3
FTP Measured Emissions/FTP Emission Standard
NOX
HC
CO
Car 01
Car 02
Car 03
Car 04
Car 05
Car 06
Car 07
Car 08
Car 09
Car 10
a
Numbers
, exceeded
JD
1.1
0.5
0.5
1.2
1.5
0.6
1.5
0.3
0.4
3.1
greater t]
the Emis!
f\ i^ S\ ""* (
After After ' After
As-Rec'd Tune-up As-Rec'd Tune-up As-Rec'd Tune-up
0.5C
0.5
1.2
1.5
0.5
1.6
0.6
0.4
0.9
1.6
0.4
0.4
0.8
0.7
1.0
1.5
•0.3
0.2
4.0
1.6C
0.4
0.3
0.6
0.6
0.9
1.4
1.0
0.1
1.1
0.8
1.2
0.8
0.5
0.5
1.7
0.5
1.7
1.5
1.8
0.8'
1.
0.
0.5
0.6
.7
.5
0.
0.
0.6
1.5
1.5
Cars 01, 02, 03, 04, 06, 08, 09 and 10 compared to 1978/1979
Federal Emission Standards of 0.93 g/kra. HC, 9.32 g/km CO, and
1.24 g/km NOX. Cars 05 and 07 compared to 1978 California
Emission Standards of 0.25 g/km HC, 5.59 g/km CO, and 0.93 g/km
NOX.
GCars 01 and 02 required little or no tune-up; therefore the
after tune-up emission rates are equal to the as-received emission
rates.
38
-------
standard. After tune-up, four cars exceeded the hydrocarbon emission
standard, three exceeded the carbon monoxide standard, and three ex-
ceeded the NOX standard.
B. Aldehyde and Ketone Emission Rates
Five individual aldehydes and ketones were evaluated in this pro-
ject: formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acetone (includes propionaldehyde
and acrolein), methylethylketone and hexanaldehyde. Acetone, meth-
ylethylketone and hexanaldehyde were detected only in small quantities,
and randomly, in the exhaust of the ten high mileage cars. Only form-
aldehyde and acetaldehyde were consistently found in the exhaust. The
formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and total aldehyde rates are summarized in
Table 17. The as-received and after tune-up averages for all ten cars
indicate a small decrease in aldehydes after tune-up. The high mileage
cars have aldehyde emission rates higher than those for corresponding
new cars, but they are still well below the emission rates for non-cat-
alyst cars. These comparisons are shown in Table 18.
C. Elemental Analysis Results
A summary of the elemental analysis results, for the FTP, is pre-
sented in Table 19. The emission rates are relatively low and are
within the range encountered in previous projects involving oxidation
and three-way catalyst cars. (1/2,3,4) There is no apparent relation-
ship between the as-received and after tune-up emission rates.
D. Other Unregulated Emissions
The remainder of the unregulated emissions measured in this pro-
ject are averaged and summarized in Table 20. The average emission
rates (10 cars) for particulates, total organic sulfides and nitrous
oxide decreased after tune-up, while the others remained unchanged or
increased. Table 21 lists the number of cars which had emission rates
decrease, increase, or remain unchanged after car tune-up. The emis-
sion rates decreased for five or more cars only in the case of partic-
ulates, organic sulfides, and nitrous oxide.
E. Comparison of Results with Previous Projects
In Tables 22 through 27, the emission rates of the ten 1978 and
1979 high mileage cars have been compared to the emission rates of
equivalent or similar, but generally low mileage, cars tested in pre-
vious projects.(1/2,3,4) In Table 27, the emission rates for Cars 09
and 10 are compared to the average emission rates for four 1978 oxida-
tion catalyst cars; since similar cars had not been tested in previous
projects. To provide an overall comparison, the emission rates of the
ten cars have been averaged and compared to the average emission rates
of previously tested non-catalyst, oxidation catalyst, and three-way
catalyst cars. These results are given in Table 28. In general, the
average emission rates for the high mileage cars are higher, both as-
39
-------
TABLE 17. AVERAGE ALDEHYDE EMISSION RATES FROM HIGH MILEAGE CATALYST CARS
Average Emission Rate (mg/km)
Car 01
Car 02
Car 03 (As-Received)
Car 03 (After Tune-up)
Car 04 (as-Received)
Car 04 (After Tune-up) a
Car 05 (As-Received)
Car 05 (After Tune-up)
Car 06 (As-Received)
Car 06 (After Tune-up)
Car 07 (As-Received)
Car 07 (After Tune-up)
Car 08 (As-Received)
Car 08 (After Tune- up)
Car 09 (As-Received)
Car 09 (After Tune-up)
Car 10 (As-Received)
Car 10 (After Tune- up)
b
Average All Cars
(As-Received)
Average All Cars
(After Tune-up)
Form-
aldehyde
8.83
0.00
2.88
0.94
5.38
7.37
1.75
0.41
1.13
1.22
6.36
7.68
5.31
1.27
1.70
1.34
17.01
5.81
*"»
5.04C
3.49C
FTP
Acet-
aldehyde
1.62
0.30
1.03
0.00
1.14
1.68
0.85
0.82
2.14
1.21
1.33
0.84
0.00
0.30
0.00
0.00
2.82
0.18
1.12
0.70
Total
Aldehydes
and Ketones
10.5
0.3
3.9
0.9
6.5
9.1
2.6
1.3
3.6
2.6
7.7
8.5
5.3
1.6
1.7
1.3
19.8
6.0
6.2
4.2
Form-
aldehyde
3.73
2.14
0.00
3.24
3.59
4.53
0.50
0.02
0.10
0.60
4.57
6.61
2.32
0.60
0.90
2.45
6.44
1.68
2.43
2.56
HFET
Acet-
aldehyde
0.93
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.14
0.25
0.17
0.13
0,70
0.41
0.75
1.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.66
0.40
0.54
0.32
Total
Aldehydes
and Ketones
5.0
2.2
0.0
3.3
4.8
4.8
0.7
0.2
1.1
1.0
5.3
7.7
3.3
0.6
0.9
2.4
8.1
2.1
3.1
2.9
Only one test point
DData for Cars 1 and 2 used in both averages
"Values of 3.7 and 3.2 when data for Car 10 omitted
-------
TABLE 18. COMPARISON OF AVERAGE FTP ALDEHYDE EMISSION RATES
TO EMISSION RATES FROM PREVIOUS PROJECTS
Emission Rates, mg/km
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Total Adlehydes
High Mileage Cars
Low Mileage Cars
Oxidation Catalyst
After
As-Rec'd Tune-Up
7
1
8
5
1
6
3-Way Catalyst
After Oxidation 3-Way
As-Rec'd Tune-Up Catalysta Catalyst*3
2
1
2
Non-Catalyst Cars
1970C1977b
32 10
4 2
37 13
Average for four 1978 oxidation catalyst-equipped cars in unmodified configuration,
EPA Contract 68-03-2499
Average for four 1978 and 1979 three-way catalyst-equipped cars in unmodified
configuration, EPA Contracts 68-03-2588 and 68-03-2692
^
Average for four 1970 non-catalyst cars, in unmodified configuration,
EPA Contract 69-03-2884, Tasks 4 and 5
value from one 1977 non-catalyst car in unmodified configuration,
EPA Contract 68-03-2499
-------
ro
TABLE 19. SUMMARY OF THE AVERAGE ELEMENTAL ANALYSES RESULTS FOR THE FTP
Emission Rate, mg/km
s
Car 01 0.03
Car 02 0.37
Car 03 (As-Received) 0.12
Car 03 (After Tune-up) 0.20
Car 04 (As-Received) 0.07
Car 04 (After Tune-up) 0.13
Car 05 (As-Received) 0.05
Car 05 (After Tune-up) 0.04
Car 06 (As-Received) 0.04
Car 06 (After Tune-up) 0.04
Car 07 (As-Received) 0.10
Car 07 (After Tune-up) 0.10
Car 08 (As-Received) 0.06
Car 08 (After Tune-up) 0.03
Car 09 (As-Received) 0.26
Car 09 (After Tune-up) 0.08
Car 10 (As-Received) 1.28
Car 10 (After Tune-up) 0.28
These analyses not conducted
Car 10, as received, also had
and manganese (0.29 mg/km).
S-Sulfur Cl-Chlorine
Mq-Magnesium Al-Aluminum
Mg Cl
0.01 0.01
0.00 0.01
0.00 0.04
0.01 0.01
0.00 0.02
0.02 0.01
0.01 0.05
0.01 0.01
0.01 0.00
0.02 0.01
0.02 0.02
0.01 0.01
0.01 0.01
0.01 0.01
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.01
Al
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.11
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.04
0.02
0.01
0.01
Zn
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.37 0.46 0.21 1.95
0.12 0.08 0.02 0.20
for Cars 01-06.
appreciable emission rates
Zn-Zinc Ca-Calcium
Si-Silicon Fe-Iron
Si
0.02
0.11
0.16
0.10
0.92
0.16
0.04
0.02
0.01
0.03
0.09
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.00
Ca
0.04
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.04
0.12
0.09
0.04
0.17
0.22
0.08
0.06
0.05
0.06
0.08
0.40 1.93
0.06 0.53
for lead (0.99
P-Phosphorus
fir-Bromine
Fe
0.12
0.20
0.50
0.95
0.54
0.43
0.50
0.21
0.37
0.20
0.32
0.10
0.49
0.09
0.05
0.19
P
0.02
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.02
Br
0.00
0.00
0.17
0.04
0.12
0.13
0.21
0.20
0.09
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.23 1.20 0.02
0.49 0.26 0.00
mg/km) , sodium (0.
Mo-Molybdenum
W-Tungsten
Moa
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.27
0.28
0.17
0.23
0.25
0.18
wa
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.03
0.00
0.05
0.51 0.13
0.28 0.04
28 mg/km) ,
Sr-Strontium
Sra
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.16
0.19
0.12
0.14
0.15
0.16
0.30
0.16
Note: With exception of lead, sodium and manganese emission rates for Car 10, compounds not included in
this table had rates less than 0.05 mg/km and were found in exhaust of only four or less cars.
-------
TABLE 20. AVERAGE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS DATA
FTP Emission Rates, mg/km
Average for Average for
10 Cars 10 Cars
As-Received After Tune-up
Total Particulates 49 32
Compound Group Totals
Organic Sulfides 0.2 0.1
Organic Amines 0.01 0.01
Other Compounds
Ammonia 7 9
Cyanide and Cyanogen 1 1
Hydrogen Sulfide 0.03 0.03
Nitrous Oxide 46 36
TABLE 21. RELATIONSHIP OF THE AS-RECEIVED TO THE
AFTER TUNE-UP FTP EMISSION RESULTS
No. of Cars for
No. of Cars for No. of Cars for which emissions
which emissions which emissions remained
Decreased after Increased after unchanged after
Tune-up Tune-up Tune-up*
Total Particulates
Compound Group Totals
Organic Sulfides 514
Organic Amines 109
Other Compounds
Ammonia 442
Cyanide and Cyanogen 352
Hydrogen Sulfide 037
Nitrous Oxide 622
*Since Cars 1 and 2 required little or no tune-up, the as-received
emissions and after tune-up emissions are assumed to be unchanged.
43
-------
TABLE 22. COMPARISON OF CARS, 01, 06, AND 08 WITH RESULTS FROM PREVIOUS PROJECTS
FTP Emission Rates in mg/km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide
Oxides of Nitrogen
Particulates
Total Particulates
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
Car 06-1978
Car 01
1978 Buick
Regal
1,060
14,550
940
31
10
0.2
<0.1
6
2
0.0
26
Olds. Cutlass
As-Rec'd
540
9,110
2,155
19
4
<0.1
0.0
14
6
0.0
145
After
Tune-up
475
8,520
680
18
3
<0.1
0.0
7
2
<0.1
43
Car 08-1978
Monte
Carlo
After
As-Rec'd Tune-up
275
3,070
2,090
20
5
0.1
0.0
7
1
0.0
39
Fuel Consumption
520
9,095
710
38
2
0.1
0.0
4
2
<0.1
32
(VlOO km)
1978 Malibu
Previous
Unmod.a
310
5,540
750
6
2
0.5
<0.1
3
1
0.0
41
Project
Maximum*5
1,780
26,020
1,110
9
5
1.2
0.1
18
3
0.1
57
14.0
12.4
12.8
12.8
12.6
13.7
14.7
Note: 1978 Federal Emission Standards in mg/km were: 932; 9,323; and 1,243 for HC, CO &
aAverage emission rates (4 FTP's) for a 1978 Chevrolet Malibu with a 305 CID engine and w/o
an air pump in unmodified configuration, EPA Contract 68-03-2499.
Maximum emission rates for a 1978 Chevrolet Malibu with a 305 CID engine and w/o an air
pimp in modified or malfunction configuration, EPA Contract 68-03-2499.
-------
TABLE 23. COMPARISON OF CARS 02 AND 03 WITH RESULTS FROM PREVIOUS PROJECTS
_FTP Emission Rates in mg/km
Ui
Car 03
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide
Oxides of Nitrogen
Particulates
Total Particulates
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
Car 02
1979 Marquis
As-Rec'd
430
3,475
1,430
17
<1
0.4
0.0
12
0.1
0.0
59
1979 Marquis
As-Rec'd
420
3,680
1,030
24
4
0.6
<0.1
1
0.1
0.0
53
FTP
After
Tune- up
420
2,410
1,065
16
2
0.1
<0.1
3
0.3
0.0
49
1979 Marquis Previous
Unmod.d 19,000
130
1,630 1,
830 1,
4
3
0.2 <
0.0 <
•
5
0.3
0.0
24
Projects
miles13 Maximum0
230
340
010
—
5
0.1
0.1
2
0.9
0.0
37
1,800
52,410
2,510
11
3
0.6
<0.1
253
112
1
88
Fuel Consumption (£/100 km)
16.6
17.3
16.5
15.8
15.5
18.5
Note: 1979 Emission Standards in mg/km were:
930; 9,322 and 1,243 for HC, CO and NOX
Average emission rates (4 FTPs) for a 1979 Mercury Marquis in unmodified configuration,
EPA Contract 68-03-2692
Average emission rates (6 FTP'S, 2 each for 3 fuels) for a 1979 Mercuey Marquis at 19,000 miles,
EPA Contract 68-02-2497
CMaximum emission rate for a 1979 Mercury Marquis in unmodified or malfunction configuration,
EPA Contract 68-03-2692
-------
TABLE 24. COMPARISON OF CAR 04 WITH RESULTS FROM PREVIOUS PROJECTS
FTP Emission Rates in
Car 04-
1978 Granada
After
Tune-up
As-Rec'd
1978 Granada
Previous Project
Unmod.a Maximum^
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons 1,080 1,120
Carbon Monoxide 7,020 5,610
Oxides of Nitrogen 620 670
Particulates
Total Particulates 36 44
300
1,500
1,200
2,260
50,620
4,130
18
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
7
0.0
0.0
5
0.6
0.0
7
FTP Fuel
9
0.0 0
0.0 <0
3
1.0 0
0.0 0
6
Consumption
3
.1
-1
2
.2
.0
21
(£/100
10
0.8
0.1
21
1.5
0.7
60
km)
Note: 1978 Emission Standards in mg/km were:
1,243 for HC, CO and NOX.
930; 9,322; and
Average emission rates (4 FTP's) for a 1978 Ford Granada
in unmodified configuration, EPA Contract 68-03-2499.
Maximum emission rate for a 1978 Ford Granada in unmodified
or malfunction configuration, EPA Contract 68-03-2499.
46
-------
TABLE 25. COMPARISON OF CAR 05 WITH RESULTS FROM
PREVIOUS PROJECTS
FTP Emission Rates in mg/km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide
Oxides of Nitrogen
Particulates
Total Particulates
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide S Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
Car 05-1978 Volvo 1978 Saab Previous Projects
After
As-Rec'd Tune-up Unmod.a 19,000 mi.k Maximum0
380
3,680
500
3
0.1
0.0
19
0.7
0.0
106
380 100
3,340 2,090
545 110
1
0.1
0.0
31
0.9
0.0
123
< 1
0.3
61
1.1
0.1
11
150
2,340
670
2
2.4
0.0
22
2,150
29,470
220
17
3
3.2
318
67
6.6
23
FTP Fuel Consumption (£/100 km)
13.2
12.5
10.8
11.3
13.0
Note: 1978 California Emission Standards in mg/km were 255;
5594; and 932 for HC, CO and NOX
b
Average emission rates (4 FTP's) for a 1978 Saab 99 in
unmodified configuration, EPA Contract 68-03-2588.
Average emission rates (6 FTP's, 2 each for 3 fuels) for
a 1978 Saab 99 at 19,000 miles, EPA Contract 68-02-2497.
'Maximum emission rates for a 1978 Saab 99 in unmodified
or malfunction configuration, EPA Contract 68-03-2588.
47
-------
TABLE 26. COMPARISON OF CAR 07 WITH RESULTS
FROM PREVIOUS PROJECTS
FTP Emission Rates in mg/km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide
Oxides of Nitrogen
Particulates
Car 07-
1978 Malibu
Total Particulates
As-Rec'd
400
8,215
450
31
After
Tune-up
410
7,565
440
38
Car 07
Previous Project
Unmod.a Maximum53
185
2,158
425
1,240
52,930
1,395
15
Compound Group Totals
Aldheydes & Ketones 891
Organic Sulfides 0.1 <0.1 0.2
Organic Amines 0.0 0.0 <0.1
Other Compounds
Ammonia 3 13 5
Cyanide & Cyanogen 0.7 0.3 0.1
Hydrogen Sulfide 0.0 0.0 0.0
Nitrous Oxide 235
12
0.4
12
1.6
0.1
10
Fuel Consumption (&/100 km)
16.8
16.3
17.4
19.0
Note: 1978 California Emission Standards in mg/km were 255;
5594; and 932 for HC, CO, and NOX
Average emission rates (4 FTP's) for Car 07 in unmodified
configuration, EPA Contract 68-03-2499 (Car 07 was known
as Car 13 in Contract 68-03-2499).
Maximum emission rates for Car 07 in unmodified or mal-
function configuration, EPA Contract 68-03-2499 (Car 07
was known as Car 13 in Contract 68-03-2499).
48
-------
TABLE 27. COMPARISON OF CARS 9 AND 10 WITH RESULTS FROM PREVIOUS PROJECTS
FTP Emission Rates in mg/km
Car 10-1978 Four
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide
Oxides of Nitrogen
Particulates
Total Particulates
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ke tones
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
Car 09-1978
As-Rec'd
395
1,595
1,860
35
2
<0.1
0.0
2
0.2
0.0
9
Fiesta
After
Tune-upa
340
1,380
1,800
33
1
<0.1
0.0
2
0.4
0.0
7
New Yorker Cars,
As-Rec'd
2,840
37,600
2,280
264
20
<0.1
0.0
3
1.9
0.3
13
After
Tune-up Avg.
825
10,145 3,
1,880
83
6
<0.1
0.0 <
4
0.2
0.3 <
13
1978 Oxid. Catalyst
Previous
Unmod.b
275
145
860
6
3
0.3
D.I
3
0.4
0.1
26
Pro j ects
Maximum0
2,255
52,930
4,150
18
12
1.0
0.1
57
6
0.7
60
Fuel Consumption (£/100 km)
7.7
7.6
19.9
17.9
Note: 1978 Federal Emission Standards in
were: 932; 9323; and 1243 for HC, CO and NOX.
aOnly one test point
Average emission rates of four 1978 oxidation catalyst cars tuned to manufacturer's specification,
EPA Contract 68-03-2499.
CMaximum emission rate in unmodified or malfunction configuration for four 1978 oxidation catalyst
cars, EPA Contract 68-03-2499.
-------
TABLE 28. COMPARISON WITH RESULTS FROM PREVIOUS PROJECTS
Average FTP Emission Rates, mg/km
Regulated Emission
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide
Oxides of Nitrogen
Total Particulates
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
High Mileage Cars
As-Rec'd
780
9,200
1,340
49
6
280
3,150
860
6
3
*J
3
<1
< 1
3-Way Cat. Non-Catalyst
1978 S 197913 1970&
120 1,900
1,900 17,100
480 2,600
9 99°
1 37
<1 <1
21 4
<1 3
<1 < 1
1977b
730
11,100
1,210
31
13
-------
received and after tune-up, than the rates for the low mileage oxida-
tion and three-way catalyst cars. However, the rates for the high
mileage cars are lower than the rates for non-catalyst cars. Compared
to the low mileage catalyst equipped cars, the high mileage cars pro-
duced particulate emission rates five times higher; hydrocarbon,
carbon monoxide and aldehyde emission rates three times higher; and
NOX and nitrous oxide emission rates two times higher.
F. Relative Importance of the Emission Rates
There are established automotive source emission standards for
HC, CO, and NOX. Such standards can be utilized in a comparative
analysis of the emission results for those compounds. For other com-
pounds evaluated, however, attempted analysis of relative importance
requires the application of some other available criteria. The criteria
utilized in the previous projects were the Threshold Limit Values
(TLV) ' In brief, the criteria and procedure are described as fol-
lows:
The maximum emission rates (HER) are converted to an
equivalent maximum emission concentration (MEC) in
the undiluted exhaust. This MEC is then compared to
the TLV. The TLV is the limit established by OSHA
for exposure by a worker in any eight-hour work shift.
The conversion from an emission rate in g/km to mg/m3
was determined by the total volume of the undiluted
exhaust and the total distance driven for each test.
The volume of undiluted exhaust differs for each car,
generally as a function of the fuel consumption rate.
The maximum emission rates are summarized and compared to the
TLV in Table 29. This table also includes the overall average emission
rates for the ten cars as received. These values are intended to pro-
vide some idea of the relative importance, based on toxicity, for some
of the compounds evaluated. It should be emphasized, however, that
definite conclusions are currently inappropriate for any compounds,
except possibly those for which automotive source emission standards
have been established. It should be recognized that the hazard level
of a compound may change based on new findings in health effects re-
search. This is especially a factor when a compound is changed from a
toxic concern to a carcinogenic concern, such as is apparently occurring
with formaldehyde.
On the basis of comparisons of the maximum and the overall average
emissions rates to the threshold limit values, the currently regulated
CO and NOX emissions appeared to be the most significant. Next in
significance appeared to be formaldehyde; again, this significance is
based on the toxicological properties of formaldehyde rather than its
potential carcinogenicity.
51
-------
TABLE 29. RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF FTP EMISSION RATES
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide
Oxides of Nitrogen
Total Particulates
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
Formaldehyde
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons
Carbon Monoxide
Oxides of Nitrogen
Total Particulates
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
Formaldehyde
Maximum Emissions
Emission
Rate (ER)
in mg/km
2,840
37,600
2,280
264
20
0.6
<0.1
31
6
0.3
145
17
780
9,200
1,340
49
6
0.2
<0.1
7
1
<0.1
46
5
Car
No.
10
10
10
10
10
03
01
05
06
10
06
10
^^
—
—
—
^^
—
«.
__
—
—
—
—
Equivalent ER
in Undiluted
Exhaust in
mg/m3 (EC)a
1,600
20,700
1,300
145
11
0.3
<0.1
23
5
0.1
123
9
Average Emissions
570
6,720
980
36
4
0.1
<0.1
5
0.7
< 0.1
34
4
Threshold
Limit Value Ratio of
(TLV in mg/m3) EC to TLV
OSHA (9) Rb
__ v_ _ —
55 — 375
9 — 145
—
« «^ ,_-
10 <1
>10 <1
35 — 1
— 51
10 <1
—
4 — 2
(.as-Received)
^_ ^_ •»_
55 — 120
9 — 110
—
..
10 < 1
>10 < 1
35 -- <1
5 <1
10 < 1
— — —
4 — 1
Derived on a wet basis using the following approximate calculations:
mg/m3 = Conversion Factor x mg/km. CF = Distance * Dilution Factor -f Volume
Based on values for some similar or related compounds as set by OSHA (9) or
recommended by the 1968 American Conference of Governmental Industrial
Hygienists (10)
52
-------
LIST OF REFERENCES
1. Urban, C.M., "Regulated and Unregulated Exhuast Emissions from
Malfunctioning Non-Catalyst and Oxidation Catalyst Gasoline
Automobiles," Final Report to Environmental Protection Agency
under Contract No. 68-03-2499, January 1980.
2. Urban, C.M., "Regulated and Unregulated Exhaust Emissions from
Malfunctioning Three-Way Catalyst Gasoline Automobiles," Final
Report to Environmental Protection Agency under Contract No.
68-03-2588, January 1980.
3. Urban, C.M., "Regulated and Unregulated Exhaust Emissions from a
Malfunctioning Three-Way Catalyst Gasoline Automobiles" Final
Report to Environmental Protection Agency under Contract No.
68-03-2692, January 1980.
4. Smith, L.R., "Characterization of Emissions from Motor Vehicles
Designed for Low NOX Emissions," Final Report to Environmental
Protection Agency under Contract No. 68-02-2497, July 1980.
5. Urban, C.M., "Unregulated Exhaust Emissions from Non-Catalyst
Baseline Cars Under Malfunction Conditions," Final Report to
Environmental Protection Agency under Tasks 4 and 5 of Contract
No. 68-03-2884, 1981.
6. Dietzmann, H.E., et al. "Analytical Procedures for Characterizing
Unregulated, Pollutant Emissions from Motor Vehicles," Report EPA
600/2-79-017, February 1979.
7. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Chapter 1, Part 85,
Subpart H Section applicable to 1979 Model Year Light-Duty Vehicles.
8. Highway Fuel Economy Driving Schedule (Federal Register, Vol. 41,
No. 100, May 21, 1976, Appendix I).
9. U.S. HEW "Registry of Toxic Effect of Chemical Substances," 1976
and 1978 Editions.
10. Proceedings of the 1968 American Conference of Governmental
Industrial Hygienists as reported in the Fifth Edition of the
"Matheson Gas Data Book."
53
-------
APPENDICES
A - GENERAL INFORMATION
B - INDIVIDUAL TEST RESULT SUMMARY TABLES
C - FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE RESULTS
D - COMPUTER PRINTOUTS OF THE TEST RESULTS
E - SHORT-TEST RESULTS
F - AVERAGE VALUES FOR FTP AND HFET RESULTS
-------
APPENDIX A
GENERAL INFORMATION
A-l - I/M Short Test Procedures
A-2 - Calculations for Unregulated Emissions
A-3 - Memorandum to SwRC Employees
A-4 - Tune-Up Check List
-------
APPENDIX A-l. I/M SHORT TEST PROCEDURES
NOTE: All tests are to be run with the hood open and the cooling fan on.
1. Warm-up to normal operating condition
If engine is cold - run UDDS
If engine is warm - run 505
2. Run 50 MPH in Drive or 3rd gear (FTP Inertia and HP Setting)
Minute 1 - check and adjust load
Minute 2 - stabilize
Minute 3 - measure HC and CO
3. Idle 6 minutes and then measure HC and CO in the 4-Mode Idle Test
(30 seconds per mode)
(a) Idle in Neutral
(b) 2500 RPM in Neutral
(c) Idle in Neutral
(d) Idle in Drive (or with clutch in)
4. Run 30 MPH (3 minutes total) and set dynamometer at 9.0 actual HP
with minimum inertia - Idle 6 minutes and then measure HC and CO in
the loaded 2-Mode Test (30 seconds per mode)
(a) 30 mph (Drive or 3rd Gear)
(b) Idle in Neutral
5. Make a preliminary check of propane enrichment - Adjust propane flow
rate until the engine speed peaks out (and starts to decrease)
Run 30 mph for two minutes
Idle in Neutral w/o propane for two minutes
Record RPM in each of the following conditions (each mode should take
about 30 seconds):
a. PCV system in place w/o propane
b. PCV system in place with propane
c. PCV valve removed from grommet w/o propane
d. PCV valve removed from grommet with propane
e. PCV fresh air line opened prior to PCV filter w/o propane
f. PCV fresh air line opened prior to PCV filter with propane
NOTE: "a" and "b" will be repeated if initial checks show such to be
worthwhile. Repeat the two minutes at 30 mph and at idle, and
"a" through "f" in Drive, in cars with an automatic transmission.
A-2
-------
APPENDIX A-2. CALCULATIONS FOR UNREGULATED EMISSIONS
This appendices documents the calculational methods used for the un-
regulated emissions. All values not defined (i.e., CVS FLOW, VOL, etc.)
are obtained from the computer printouts for the regulated emissions.
Example printout is included as Table 1.
A. Individual Hydrocarbons and N2O
1. For FTP Evaluations only, convert 2-Bag UDDS to Equivalent
1-Bag UDDS
PPM2XCVS FLOW2
PPM 12 = -
CVS FLOW! + CVS FLOW2
PPM3xCVS FLOW3 + PPM4xCVS FLOW4
PPM 34 =
CVS FLOW 3 + PPM FLOW4
2 . Convert PPM to yg/m3 :
yg/m3 = 35.32*DENSITYXppM
Density, g/ft3
Methane CH4 - 18.86 Propane C3Hg - 17.29
Ethylene C2H4 - 16.50 Propylene C3H - 16.50
Ethane C2H6 - 17.68 Benzene CgHg - 15.33
Acetylene C2H2 - 15.33 Toluene C7H8 - 15.49
NH3 - 20.05
N20 - 51.82
B. Calculation of mg/km
mg/kra = f (EXHxSCF - BGxDFC) x VOL^KM] T 1000
Calculations were performed using a Hewlett-Packard HP-65
Programmable Calculator
Dry (DFC) and (SFC) was used for all unregulated emissions
except: IHC-aridN20
DFC and SFC are obtained from the computer print-out for
regulated emissions. (See Talbes 1 and 2.)
C. Metals and Other Elements
COMPONENT WEIGHT ON FILTER = yg/cm2 EFF. FILTER AREA
EFF. FILTER AREA =14.3 cm2
COMPONENT yg/m3 = C.W.O.F. 4 TOTAL WT. x (yg/m for Total Wt.)
A-3
-------
APPENDIX A-2 (Cont'd). CALCULATIONS FOR UNREGULATED EMISSIONS
D. Calculation of Oxygen
= % for Oxygen
E. Calculation for 4-FTP
Composite 4-FTP = 0.43 x (Value for 1&2) +0.57 x (Value for 3&4)
A-4
-------
APPENDIX A-2 (Cont'd). CALCULATIONS FOR UNREGULATED EMISSIONS
TABLE 1.. COMPUTER PRINTOUT NOMENCLATURE FOR''FOUR-BAG FTP
FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS
PROJECT
TEST NO, RUN
VEHICLE MODEL
ENGINE L(. CID)
TRANSMISSION i.
BAROMETER . MM h'G< IN HO)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY PCT
BAG RESULTS
DAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
DLOUER DIF P MM, H20 DRY
DFCr WET (DRY)
SCF» WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER
BAROMETER MM HO
HUMIDITY G/KG
TEMPERATURE BEG C
CARBON DIOXIDE G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/iOOKM
HYDROCARBONS (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN G/KM
PARTICULATES G/KM
3-BAG
(4-BAG)
( )
( )
( >
( )
( )
( )
-------
APPENDIX A-2 (CONT'D). CALCULATION FOR UNREGULATED EMISSIONS
TABLE 2. DEFINITION OF COMPUTER PRINTOUT NOMENCLATURE
FOR FOUR-BAG AND SINGLE-BAG
REGULATED EMISSIONS
The following are primarily exerpts taken from the computer program:
AVG. EXH. OXYGEN: Direct printout of an input
CATALYST AVG. AND MAX. TEMPS.: Input converted to °C and printed-out
C DFC = DILUTION FACTOR CORRECTION DFC = FOR WET SAMPLES DFCD = FOR DRY
DF(J)=13.4/( YC2(2,J) +((YH(2,J) + CC(2,J))/10000.))
DFC(J) = 1 - 1/DF(J)
C CALCULATE DFC, VOL. KM FOR BAGS 1+2 AND 3+4
C DF = TOTAL CVS FLOW / EXHAUST FLOW = AIR + EXH / EXH
C DFC = 1 - 1/DF = 1 - EXH/(AIR+EXH) = AIR/(AIR+EXH)
DFC12 =(DFC(1)*VMIX(1) + DFC(2)*VMIX(2)) / (VMIX(l) + VMIX(2))
DFC34 = (DFC(3)*VMIX(3) + DFC(4)*VMIX(4)) / (VMIX(3) + VMIX(4))
IF(RH.LT.20) RH = 20
DFCD12 = DFC12 * (1.0 - 0.000323*(RH - 20))
DFCD34 = DFC34 * (1.0 - 0.000323*(RH - 20))
C SCF = SAMPLE CORRECTION FACTOR FOR WATER REMOVAL SCF = FOR WET SCFD=DRY
SCF12 = 1.000
SCF34 = 1.000
SCFD12 = (SCFD(1)*VMIX(1)+SCFD(2)+VMIX(2)) / (VMIX(l) + VMIX(2))
SCFD34 = (SCFD(3)*VMIX(3)+SCFD(4)*VMIX(4)) / (VMIX(3) +VMIX(4))
TOTAL FUEL SULFUR:
C TFS = TOTAL FUEL SULFUR IN MG/KM
C TFS = L/100KM * PCT * G/ML * 1000ML/L * 0.01G/GPCT * 1000MG/G
TFS = CBFM * FSWPCT * FPPG * 100.
C CALCULATE 4-BAG EMISSIONS AND FUEL CONSUMPTION
C 4-BAG = 0.43*(BAG1+BAG2)/(MILES1+MILES2)+0.57*(BAG3+BAG4)/(MILES3+MILES4)
DISTA=MILES(1) + MILES(2)
DISTB=MILES(2) + MILES(3)
DISTC=MILES(3) + MILES(4)
HCWM4 = 0.43*((HCM(1)+HCM(2)) / DISTA) + 0.57*((HCM(3)+HCM(4)) / DISTC)
COWM4 = 0.43*((COM(1)+COM(2)) / DISTA) + 0.57*((COM(3)+COM(4)) / DISTC)
C02WM4= 0.43*((C02M(1)+C02M(2))/DISTA) + 0.57*((C02M(3)+CO2M(4)) / DISTC)
NOXWM4= 0.43*((NOXM(1)+NOXM(2))/DISTA) + 0.57*((NOXM(3)+NOXM(4)) / DISTC)
CBFE4 = 2421. / (.866*HCWM4 + .429*COWM4 + -273*CO2WM4)
A-6
-------
APPENDIX A-3
DEPARTMENT OF EMISSIONS RESEARCH
MEMORANDUM
TO: SwRI and SFRE Staff
SUBJECT: Exhaust emissions and fuel economy tests on
employee-owned cars.
DATE: December 10, 1980
Do you own a 1978 or later model car that has been driven over
50,000 miles using only unleaded gasoline? If so, would you be willing
to allow it to be used in an exhaust emission survey to be conducted at
the Department of Emissions Research starting in January 1981? The
test will require approximately five (5) days.
If you car is selected and used, you will be given $50.00 for the
use of you car and will be furnished a car for transportation. In
addition, you car will be tuned to factory specifications and the fuel
tank will be filled upon its return to you. The emissions and fuel economy
(mpg) results for your car will be furnished to you as soon as possible
after testing has been completed.
If you are willing to participate, please fill in the form and return
it to Orville Davis at Building 87. If you have any questions contact
Orville Davis at extension 2661.
Yes, I would like to participate in the exhaust emissions survey to
be conducted at the Department of Emissions Research.
My car has actual miles on the odometer and, to the best
of my knowledge, only unleaded fuel has been used.
Year Make Model
Name Dept. Telephone extension
A-7
-------
APPENDIX A-4. TUNE-UP CHECK LIST
ALL CARS
• All items listed on the Vehicle Emission Control Information sticker
• Check for air flow from air pump - Check if flow solenoids function
• Visual and shake test of PCV
• Air Cleaner and Spark Plug visual check
• EGR Actuation Test - Free to actuate and vacuum to
• Check for lead in tailpipe
• Visual appearance of Catalyst Exterior
• Choke setting and whether it fully opens
• Propane RPM Gain Check
• Fluid levels, oil leaks, manifold heat riser, battery charge,
visual appearance of hoses and vacuum lines
• Road test by a knowledgeable driver
MERCURY MARQUIS
• EEC Diagnostic test by a local dealer
CARS OTHER THAN MARQUIS
• Ignition timing (including check of advance with speed and vacuum)
• Idle mixture adjustment, as necessary
CARS FAILING TO MEET ANY OF THE ABOVE
• Compression check
• Parts replacement as necessary
A-8
-------
APPENDIX B
INDIVIDUAL TEST RESULT SUMMARY TABLES
-------
w
i
to
TABLE B-l. SUMMARY OF EMISSION RESULTS CAR 01 - 1978 BUICK REGAL
Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Test Number, WT
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity, g/km
Temperature, °C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp., °C
Catalyst Max. Temp., °C
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., V100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes S Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
FTP
As-Received After Tune-up
Oil 012
739.4 749.0
5.9 5.2
21.1 21.1
22.73 22.69
HFET
As-Received
Oil 012
739.1 749.0
5.9 5.1
21.1 22.8
15.78 15.47
After Tune-up
0.64 0.57
298.5 302.8
13.96 13.94
1.16
15.83
0.93
38.34
6.4
399.2
0.22
0.04
10.32
1.62
0.00
29.02
0.95
13.27
0.95
24.10
14.5
322.6
0.21
0.05
2.30
2.35
0.00
23.78
225.3 221.1
9.69 9.50
0.18
0.72
0.92
0.18
0.62
0.85
23.78 11.06
2.1 8.0
67.6 84.2
0.01 0.01
0.01 0.03
2.47
0.96
0.00
7.24
2.41
0.90
0.00
12.31
Note: No significant changes were made
during the tune-up.
-------
TABLE B-:U (Cont'd). SUMMARY OF EMISSION RESULTS CAR 01 - BUICK REGAL
Emission Rate, mg/km (Except at Noted)^
w
i
00
Test Number, WT
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Hexanaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Toluene Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
FTP
As-Received After Tune-up
Oil 012
5.88 11.77
0.54 2.70
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
6.4 14.5
0.6 1.5
74.23 62.39
101.43 74.03
16.20 17.06
20.78 16.62
0.37 1.17
45.62 33.30
55.31 52.84
85.27 65.18
399.2 322.6
34.4 34.0
0.14 0.15
0.07 0.06
0.01 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.05
0.03 0.00
0.01 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
HFET
As-Received After Tune-up
Oil 012
2.05 5.40
0.00 1.85
0.00 0.75
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
2.1 8.0
1.2 4.4
24.39 22.57
7.90 22.20
8.68 9.03
0.00 1.04
0.00 0.29
8.37 9.30
9.32 9.53
8.92 10.20
67.6 84.2
37.5 46.8
0.00 0.00
0.01 0.01
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.01 0.01
0.00 0.02
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
-------
CO
TABLE B-l (Cont'd). SUMMARY OF EMISSION RESULTS CAR 01 - BUICK REGAL
Emission Rate, mg/km
Test Number, WT
Trace Elements
Sodium
Sulfur
Vanadium
Nickel
Cadmium
Mecury
Silicon
Calcium
Iron
Selenium
Barium
Na
S
V
Ni
Cd
Hg
Magnesium Mg
Chlorine Cl
Chromium Cr
Copper Cu
Tin Sn
Lead Pb
Aluminum Al
Potassium K
Manganese Mn
Zinc Zn
Antimony Sb
Si
Ca
Fe
Se
Ba
Phosphorus P
Titanium Ti
Cobalt Co
Bromine Br
Platinum Pt
FTP
As-Received
After Tune-up
Oil
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.05
012
0.03
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.02 0.01
0.01
0.03
0.19
0.01 0.02
HFET
As-Received
After Tune-up
Oil
0.01
0.01
0.06
0.02
0.05
012
0.06 0.07
0.01
0.02
0.01 0.01
0.03
0.02
0.08
0.01 0.01
-------
TABLE B-2.
W
en
Test Number,
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
WT
mm Hg
g/km
°C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp., °C
Catalyst Max. Temp., °C
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., £/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Parti cu1 at e s
Total Particulates
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
SUMMARY OF EMISSION RESULTS CAR 02 - 1979 MERCURY MARQUIS
Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
FTP
As-Received After Tune-up
021
155.1
3.7
19.4
022
753.9
3.5
21.1
As-Received
021 022
755.4 754.1
4.1 3.4
22.2 22.8
HFET
After Tune-up
27.01 27.16
5.10 5.35
381.8 384.2
16.59 16.68
0.44 0.42
3.56 3.39
1.42 1.44
20.19 13.31
0.6 0.0
175.1 159.0
0.63 0.26
0.00 0.00
6.70
0.01
0.00
56.22
17.83
0.22
0.00
60.87
17.66 17.47
4.62 4.67
253.3 250.3
10.85 10.73
0.16
0.28
1.22
27.67
0.0
67.4
0.08
0.00
10.22
0.24
0.00
35.32
0.15
0.30
1.32
49.05
4.3
61.2
0.00
0.00
2.08
0.14
0.00
37.09
-------
TABLE B-2 (Cont'd). SUMMARY OF EMISSIONS RESULTS CAR 02 - 1979 MERCURY MARQUIS
Emission Rate, mg/km (Except at Noted)
a
i
Test Number, WT
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
He xanaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Toluene Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sul_fides_
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
FTP
As-Received After Tune-up
021 022
0.00 0.00
0.60 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.6 0.00
0.1 0.00
88.44 82.27
27.72 23.43
15.85 14.62
8.18 6.25
1.07 0.63
5.85 5.44
11.13 11.04
16.87 15.31
175.1 159.0
39.8 37.9
0.63 0.25
0.00 0.01
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
HFET
As-Received After Tune-up
021 022
0.00 4.27
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 4.3
0.00 2.8
37.73 33.92
11.68 10.26
10.19 9.51
0.00 0.00
0.53 0.49
1.69 1.65
3.26 2.94
2.36 2.47
6.74 61.2
42.2 40.8
0.08 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
-------
w
TABLE B-2 (Cont'd). SUMMARY OF EMISSIONS RESULTS CAR 02 - 1979 MERCURY MARQUIS
Emission Rate, mg/km
Test Number, WT
Trace Elements
Sodium
Sulfur
Vanadium
Nickel
Cadmium
Mecury
Na
S
V
Ni
Cd
Hg
Magnesium Mg
Chlorine Cl
Chromium Cr
Copper Cu
Tin Sn
Lead Pb
Aluminum Al
Potassium K
Manganese Mn
Zinc Zn
Antimony Sb
Silicon
Calcium
Iron
Selenium
Barium
Si
Ca
Fe
Se
Ba
Phosphorus P
Titanium Ti
Cobalt Co
Bromine Br
Platinum Pt
FTP
HFET
As-Received
After Tune-up
As-Received
After Tune-up
021
022
0.32 0.41
0.01 0.01
0.01 0.01
0.13 0.08
0.02 0.02
0.17 0.23
021
0.02
0.03
022
2.18 4.41
0.01 0.01
0.04
0.01
0.06
-------
TABLE B-3. SUMMARY OF EMISSION RESULTS CAR 03 - 1979 MERCURY MARQUIS
Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
a
i
CO
Test Number, WT
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity, g/km
Temperature, °C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp., °C
Catalyst Max. Temp., °C
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., £/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Parti culate s
Total Particulates
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
FTP
As-Received
031
737.9
7.7
21.1
28.34
4.59
400.7
17.41
0.45
3.66
0.98
27.48
155.8
0.95
0.03
1.45
0.08
0.00
52.46
032
731.0
8.1
20.6
27.82
4.30
393.4
17.09
0.38
3.70
1.08
19.93
3.9
171.0
0.15
0.03
0.06
0.00
54.36
After Tune -up
036
760.2
1.9
20.0
26.80
5.39
381.4
16.46
0.42
1.90
1.06
17.45
0.9
168.9
0.12
0.01
5.41
0.16
0.00
46.19
037
756.7
2.5
21.1
26.93
5.19
381.7
16.54
0.41
2.92
1.07
14.23
2.7
185.4
0.11
0.00
1.33
0.48
0.00
52.01
HFET
As-Received
031
736.6
8.6
22.2
17.94
4.25
255.8
11.02
0.15
1.27
1.49
25.24
59.8
0.25
0.00
1.00
0.66
0.00
57.52
032
756.9
7.5
23.9
18.17
4.15
257.9
11.16
0.18
1.91
1.62
17.77
0.0
73.7
0.06
0.00
5.62
0.10
0.00
77.71
After Tune-up
036
761.0
1.5
22.2
17.60
4.93
252.3
10.81
0.12
0.36
1.45
8.07
3.3
52.7
0.13
0.00
4.01
0.00
0.00
63.38
037
755.9
2.4
23.9
17.18
4.95
246.1
10.55
0.10
0.44
1.41
14.05
3.2
52.7
0.02
0.00
2.82
0.05
0.00
58.69
-------
TABLE B-3 (Cont'd). SUMMARY OF EMISSION RESULTS CAR 03 - 1979 MERCURY MARQUIS
Emission Rate, mg/km (Except at Noted)
td
Test Number, WT
Aldehydes and Ketones
Fo rmaIdehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
He xanaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Toluene Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
FTP
As-Received
031
—
—
_0_
_«_
— —
—
__
76.72
15.57
11.06
9.13
0.16
4.34
14.18
24.60
155.8
34.6
0.85
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
032
2.88
1.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.9
1.0
97.43
16.55
14.21
5.13
0.14
3.98
12.27
21.25
171.0
45.0
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
After
036
0.94
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.9
0.2
95.04
15.84
14.99
4.05
2.05
4.11
9.64
23.18
168.9
40.2
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Tune-up
037
0.93
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.9
6.2
106.65
16.19
13.72
6.50
0.28
4.29
13.33
24.46
185.4
45.2
0.07
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
As-Received
031
—
—
•~—
^__
—
__
— —
33.10
7.26
8.67
0.00
0.00
1.38
4.20
5.15
59.8
39.9
0.21
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
032
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
37.07
11.17
8.66
0.00
0.00
2.61
5.90
8.26
73.7
40.9
0.05
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
After Tune-up
036
3.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.3
2.8
36.92
3.53
7.92
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.10
2.20
52.7
43.9
0.11
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
037
3.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.2
3.2
38.63
3.01
7.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.98
1.76
52.7
52.7
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
TABLE B-3 (Cont'd). SUMMARY OF EMISSION RESULTS CAR 03 - 1979 MERCURY MARQUIS
Emission Rate, mg/km
Test Number, WT
Trace Elements
Sodium
Sulfur
Vanadium
Nickel
Cadmium
Mecury
Magnesium
Chlorine
Chromium
to Copper
H Tin
Lead
Aluminum
Potassium
Manganese
Zinc
Antimony
Silicon
Calcium
Iron
Selenium
Barium
Phosphorus
Titanium
Cobalt
Bromine
Platinum
Na
S
V
Ni
Cd
Hg
Mg
Cl
Cr
Cu
Sn
Pb
Al
K
Mn
Zn
Sb
Si
Ca
Fe
Se
Ba
P
Ti
Co
Br
Pt
FTP
As-Received
031
0.19
0.02
0.50
0.01
032
0.11 0.12
0.04 0.03
0.02 0.03
0.12
0.02
0.49
0.01
0.03
0.21 0.12
After Tune-up
036 037
0.20
0.01
0.01
0.18
0.02
0.08
0.04
1.42
0.02
0.08
0.20
0.04
0.11
0.03
0.47
0.02
HFET
As-Received
031
0.01
0.12
0.03
0.17
0.12
032
0.20 0.35
0.01 0.01
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.03
After Tune-up
036 037
0.93
0.85
0.01
0.01
0.10
0.02
0.01
0.03
-------
TABLE B-4. SUMMARY OF EMISSION RESULTS CAR 04 - 1978 FORD GRANADA
Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
to
i
Test Number, WT
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity, g/km
Temperature, °C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp., °C
Catalyst Max. Temp., °C
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., A/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
FTP
As-Received
041
743.5
7.4
27.8
30.69
—
427.3
18.85.
1.08
7.04
0.61
34.95
8.5
433.2
0.00
0.00
9.24
0.56
0.00
6.82
042
741.4
10.7
23.3
30.13
—
419.2
18.51
1.08
6.99
0.62
37.38
4.5
409.2
0.00
0.00
0.87
0.70
0.00
7.74
After Tune-up
046
742.2
11.4
25.0
29.83
8.06
416.8
18.32
1.12
5.61
0.67
44.31
9.1
431.6
0.00
0.00
3.38
0.98
0.00
6.10
HFET
As-Received
041
743.5
8.2
24.4
20.09
—
284.5
12.34
0.49
1.99
0.66
34.25
5.9
218.5
0.00
0.00
3.46
0.22
0.00
8.13
042
741.7
11.2
28.9
20.11
—
282.8
12.35
O.S9
2.95
0.70
25.58
3.6
258.3
0.00
0.00
1.76
1.31
0.00
8.37
After Tune-up
046
742.2
12.2
26.7
20.12
8.44
284.8
12.36
0.65
1.79
0.77
27.95
4.8
251.3
0.00
0.00
3.91
0.99
0.00
8.43
-------
TABLE B-4 (Cont'd). SUMMARY OF EMISSION RESULTS CAR 04 - 1978 FORD GRANADA
Emission Rate, mg/km (Except at Noted)
DO
I
Test Number, WT
Aldehydes and Kgtones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Hexanaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Toluene Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
FTP
As-Received
041
6.25
2.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.5
0.8
135.76
83.57
42.47
21.74
2.86
29.54
39.47
77.77
433.2
40.1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
042
4.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.5
0.4
131.64
82.29
43.04
15.12
2.23
29.95
35.10
69.85
409.2
37.9
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
After Tune-up
046
7.37
1.68
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.1
0.8
121.63
85.20
42.30
45.56
0.95
28.27
33.34
74.39
431.6
38.5
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
As-Received
041
3.86
2.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.9
1.2
70.26
47.25
26.47
5.17
1.45
17.34
18.19
32.33
218.5
44.6
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
042
3.31
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.6
0.6
82.03
53.79
26.24
13.31
1.19
19.16
22.91
39.63
258.3
43.8
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
After Tune-up
046
4.53
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.8
0.7
76.32
51.61
25.91
9.09
0.44
17.73
22.48
47.70
251.3
38.7
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
w
I
TABLE B-4 (Cont'd). SUMMARY OF EMISSION RESULTS CAR 04 - 1978 FORD GRANADA
Emission Rate, mg/km
Test Number, WT
Trace Elements
Sodium
Sulfur
Vanadium
Nickel
Cadmium
Mecury
Silicon
Calcium
Iron
Selenium
Barium
Na
S
V
Ni
Cd
Hg
Magnesium Mg
Chlorine Cl
Chromium Cr
Copper Cu
Tin Sn
Lead Pb
Aluminum Al
Potassium K
Manganese Mn
Zinc Zn
Antimony Sb
Si
Ca
Fe
Se
Ba
Phosphorus P
Titanium Ti
Cobalt Co
Bromine Br
Platinum Pt
FTP
HFET
As-Received
041
0.07
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.92
0.06
0.54
0.02
0.12
After Tune-up
046
0.01
0.13
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.07
0.16
0.04
0.43
0.05
0.13
As-Received
041
0.09
0.01
0.02
0.01
1.17
0.05
0.31
0.01
0.03
After Tune-up
046
0.16
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.79
0.03
0.29
0.03
0.01
0.11
-------
TABLE B-5. SUMMARY OF EMISSION RESULTS CAR 05 - 1978 VOLVO 245DL
Emission Rate, mg/k.m (Except as Noted)
a
i
Test Number,
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
WT
mm Hg
gAm
°C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp., °C
Catalyst Max. Temp., °C
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., Si/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide S Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
FTP
As-Received
051
741.7
9.1
23.9
21.46
0.51
301.6
13.18
0.38
3.77
0.49
6.63
3.9
207.8
0.17
0.00
18.25
0.59
0.00
97.45
052
735.6
11.5
23.3
21.54
0.47
303.2
13.23
0.38
3.59
0.51
10.12
1.3
194.0
0.05
0.00
19.82
0.85
0.00
114.77
After Tune-up
056
731.8
9.7
26.1
20.20
1.
283.
12.
0.
3.
0.
—
1.
204.
0.
0.
28.
0.
0.
128.
35
6
41
42
69
52
1
7
06
00
00
98
00
34
057
740.
6.
25.
20.
0.
288.
12.
0.
2.
0.
2.
1.
160.
0.
0.
34
0.
0.
116.
9
0
0
42
50
1
54
34
98
57
02
5
9
02
00
.98
71
00
98
HFET
As-Received
051
741.9
10.0
25.0
12.88
0.19
181.5
7.91
0.25
1.88
0.34
—
1.0
134.2
0.02
0.00
2.66
0.43
0.00
95.93
052
734.
11.
26.
12.
0.
178.
7.
0.
1.
0.
2.
0.
113.
0.
0.
10.
0.
0.
87.
6
8
1
58
14
6
73
22
19
24
14
3
7
01
00
34
62
00
13
After Tune -up
058
740.
8.
24.
12.
0.
182.
7.
0.
1.
0.
3.
0.
122.
0.
0.
20.
0.
0.
116.
9
9
4
86
16
9
90
23
00
28
34
3.
4
03
00
71
46
00
75
057
741.3
7.3
25.0
12.55
0.17
177.7
7.71
0.24
1.34
0.32
2.12
0.0
124.8
0.05
0.00
20.95
0.43
0.00
115.95
-------
TABLE B-5 (Cont'd). SUMMARY OF EMISSION RESULTS CAR 05 - 1978 VOLVO 245DL
Emission Rate, rag/km (Except at Noted)
Test Number, WT
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
MethylethyIketone
He xanaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
w Ethylene
ji Ethane
1/1 Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Toluene Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines^
Monomethylamine
Monoe thylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
FTP
As-Received
051
3.26
0.62
— —
0.00
0.00
3.9
1.0
55.01
44.91
13.28
4.18
1.15
18.20
31.01
40.09
207.8
54.7
0.13
0.02
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
052
0.24
1.07
— —
0.00
0.00
1.3
0.3
54.21
39.88
12.40
3.41
0.88
17.68
30.08
35.46
194.0
51.1
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
After
056
0.36
0.54
— —
0.23
0.00
1.1
0.3
53.83
42.00
12.82
2.45
0.89
18.22
28.98
45.49
204.7
48.7
0.05
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Tune-up
057
0.46
1.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.5
0.4
50.90
28.77
11.52
3.42
0.27
12.41
23.45
30.17
160.9
47.3
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
As-Received
051
1.00
0.00
— —
0.00
0.00
1.0
0.4
28.22
35.09
8.61
0.00
0.00
18.00
17.90
26.36
134.2
53.7
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
052
0.00
0.34
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.3
0.1
26.76
27.80
7.79
0.00
0.27
14.21
16.24
20.61
113.7
51.7
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
After
056
0.04
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.3
0.1
28.12
29.93
8.90
0.00
0.30
16.05
16.12
22.98
122.4
53.2
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Tune-up
057
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
27.37
31.21
8.40
0.00
0.43
16.92
16.06
24.36
124.8
52.0
0.04
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
ro
M
CTi
TABLE B-5 (Cont'd). SUMMARY OF EMISSION RESULTS CAR 05 - 1978 VOLVO 245DL
Emission Rate, mg/km
Test Number, WT
Trace Elements
Sodium
Sulfur
Vanadium
Nickel
Cadmium
Mecury
Silicon
Calcium
Iron
Selenium
Barium
Na
S
V
Ni
Cd
Hg
Magnesium Mg
Chlorine Cl
Chromium Cr
Copper Cu
Tin Sn
Lead Pb
Aluminum Al
Potassium K
Manganese Mn
Zinc Zn
Antimony Sb
Si
Ca
Fe
Se
Ba
Phosphorus P
Titanium Ti
Cobalt Co
Bromine Br
Platinum Pt
FTP
As-Received
051
0.01
0.05
052
0.06 0.04
0.01
0.04
0.02 0.01
After Tune-up
056
0.04
0.01
0.01
0.03
057
0.04
0.01
0.01
0.03 0.04 0.01 0.02
0.10 0.13 0.07 0.10
0.66 0.33 0.15 0.26
0.02 0.02 0.01 0.02
0.20 0.22 0.19 0.20
HFET
As-Received
051
052
0.02 0.02
0.01 0.01
0.02 0.01
0.08 0.08
0.01
0.09 0.12
After Tune-up
056
0.04
0.01
0.20
0.01
0.08
0.25
0.01
0.01
0.22
057
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.08
0.01
0.10
-------
TABLE B-6. SUMMARY OP EMISSION RESULTS CAR 06 - 1978 OLDSMOBILE CUTLASS
Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Test Number, WT
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity, g/km
Temperature, °c
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp., °C
Catalyst Max. Temp., °C
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., &/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
P a r t i c u 1 a t e s
Total Particulates
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
FTP
As-Received
061
752.1
6.1
24.4
20.33
0.98
276.2
12.49
0.56
9.37
2.08
18.33
3.1
262.7
0.06
0.00
16.43
6.08
0.00
138.27
062
751.
6.6
23.
20.
—
273.
12.
0.
8.
2.
20.
4.
212.
0.
0.
10.
5.
0.
151.
3
3
11
7
35
52
85
23
22
0
9
04
00
59
45
00
75
After Tune-up
066
749.
8.
24.
21.
1.
289.
13.
0.
8.
0.
12.
3.
218.
0.
0.
9.
2.
0.
49.
8
1
4
18
27
8
01
42
68
69
78
8
5
06
00
26
04
00
86
068
746.
7.
25.
20.
1.
278.
12.
0.
8.
0.
22.
1.
234.
0.
0.
4.
1.
0.
35.
8
2
0
40
38
7
53
53
36
67
63
3
0
02
00
33
93
09
52
HFET
As-Received
061
752.3
7.5
25.6
14.41
0.87
205.6
8.85
0.12
0.83
2.88
11.74
1.6
54.8
0.04
0.00
6.27
2.41
0.00
87.63
062
751.3
6.5
25.0
14.60
—
208.4
8.97
0.11
0.89
2.97
11.70
0.5
56.7
0.01
0.00
14.12
1.83
0.00
95.69
After Tune-up
066
750.1
7.8
25.0
15.11
0
215
9
0
0
0
11
1
56
0
0
4
0
0
27
.82
.7
.28
.10
.92
.70
.12
.6
.6
.02
.00
.07
.06
.00
.91
067
746.8
7.7
23.9
14.98
0.76
213.6
9.20
0.10
0.95
0.66
12.76
0.4
49.1
0.01
0.00
2.73
0.72
0.00
21.35
-------
TABLE B-6 (Cont'd). SUMMARY OF EMISSION RESULTS CAR 06 - 1978 OLDSMOBILE CUTLASS
Emission Rate, mg/km (Except at Noted)
w
i
H
00
Test Number, WT
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
He xanaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Toluene Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monome thy1amine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
FTP
As-Received
061
0.94
1,92
0.00
0.22
0.00
3.1
0.6
56.66
59.74
13.31
12.37
0.28
26.20
33.96
60.17
262.7
46.9
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0;00
062
1.32
2.36
0.00
0.27
0.00
4.0
0.8
51.75
30.50
6.06
17.78
0.46
19.31
30.12
56.91
212.9
40.9
0.03
o.oo
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
After
066
.1.70
1.84
0.00
0.21
0.00
3.8
0.9
59.73
44.38
12.88
14.46
2.83
16.83
26.00
41.39
218.5
52.0
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Tune-up
068
0.74
0.57
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.3
0.2
51.68
43.92
11.23
20.87
0.82
17.47
28.64
59.34
234.0
44.2
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
As-Received
061
0.19
0.88
0.51
0.00
0.00
1.6
1.3
21.84
10.56
5.08
0.00
0.00
3.65
5.37
8.34
54.8
45.7
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
062
0.00
0.51
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.5
0.5
23.80
10.68
4.67
0.00
0.00
3.77
5.39
8.36
56.7
51.6
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
After Tune-up
066
0.75
0.81
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.6
1.6
25.30
10.82
5.28
0.00
1.25
2.66
5.42
5.83
56.6
56.6
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
067
0.44
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.4
0.4
19.51
8.74
4.57
0.00
0.25
2.98
5.04
8.01
49.1
49.1
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
O.OO
-------
TABLE B-6 (Cont'd). SUMMARY OF EMISSION RESULTS CAR 06 - 1978 OLDSMOBILE CUTLASS
Emission Rate, rug/km
Test Number
, WT
FTP HFET
As-Received After Tune-up As-Received After Tune-up
061 062 068 067 061 062 066 067
Trace Elements
Sodium
Sulfur
Vanadium
Nickel
Cadmium
Mecury
Magnesium
Chlorine
Chromium
w Copper
,1 Tin
^ Lead
Aluminum
Potassium
Manganese
Zinc
Antimony
Silicon
Calcium
Iron
Selenium
Barium
Na
S
V
Ni
Cd
Hg
Mg
Cl
Cr
Cu
Sn
Pb
Al
K
Mn
Zn
Sb
Si
Ca
Fe
Se
Ba
0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03
0.01
0.01 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
0.01 0.01 0.19
0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.01
0.05 0.02
0.02 0.02 0.01
0.01 0.01 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.02
0.06 0.02 0.04 0.30 0.03
0.23 0.51 0.21 0.18 0.07 0.18 0.11 0.10
Phosphorus P
Titanium Ti
Cobalt Co
Bromine Br
Platinum Pt
0.03 0.03
0.07 0.10
0.02
0.02
0.13
0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
0.10 0.12 0.29
-------
TABLE B-7. SUMMARY OF EMISSION RESULTS CAR 07 - 1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU, CALIFORNIA
Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
to
o
Test Number, WT
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity, g/km
Temperature, °C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
°C
°C
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Catalyst Avg. Temp.,
Catalyst Max. Temp.,
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., &/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
FTP
As-Received
071
747.3
6.2
24.4
27.29
—
379.0
16.76
0.38
7.95
0.44
27.23
9.2
224.7
0.12
0.00
3.17
0.63
0.00
2.83
072
736.9
5.0
23.3
27.50
4.18
381.1
16.89
0.42
8.48
0.46
34.34
6.2
243.9
0.03
0.00
2.10
0.77
0.00
1.94
After Tune-up
076
747.8
2.4
22.8
26.54
4.77
370.0
16.30
0.40
6.83
0.43
32.92
__
220.3
0.05
0.00
14.51
0.06
0.00
4.50
078
742.7
10.0
25.0
26.41
5.48
365.7
16.22
0.42
8.30
0.45
43.15
8.5
210.1
0.03
0.00
10.85
0.47
0.00
2.40
HFET
As-Received
071
747.5
5.7
25.6
17.58
—
250.5
10.80
0.10
1.38
0.38
17.94
5.7
64.3
0.10
0.00
2.63
0.09
0.00
2.63
072
737.1
5.1
24.4
16.93
4.98
240.9
10.40
0.12
1.52
0.36
22.93
4.9
68.0
0.04
0.00
6.44
0.35
0.00
1.93
After Tune -up
076
747.3
3.5
26.7
17.79
4.97
253.9
10.93
0.10
1.15
0.32
20.54
7.3
63.7
0.01
0.00
1.70
0.13
0.00
2.78
078
741.9
10.4
27.2
17.71
5.01
251.3
10.88
0.16
2.05
0.40
29.33
8.0
83.3
0.02
0.00
5.88
0.21
0.00
2.20
-------
TABLE B-7 (Cont'd)
SUMMARY OF EMISSION RESULTS CAR 07 - 1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU, CALIFORNIA
Emission Rate, rag/km (Except at Noted)
to
i
Test Number, WT
Aldehydes and Ketones
FormaIdehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Hexanaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Toluene Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
FTP
As-Received
071
6.49
2.66
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.2
2.4
88.14
46.82
12.18
8.98
0.88
15.78
19.21
32.72
224.7
59.1
0.08
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
072
6.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.2
1.5
90.39
50.08
12.11
8.33
0.27
17.15
23.13
42.40
243.9
58.1
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
After
076
—
—
—
77.74
50.27
.11.46
8.42
0.00
16.07
20.37
35.94
220.3
55.1
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Tune -up
078
7.68
0.84
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.5
2.0
62.92
54.43
9.39
6.99
0.25
16.89
21.52
37.75
210.1
50.0
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
As-Received
071
4.25
1.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.7
5.7
19.54
22.79
3.81
1.44
0.00
5.20
5.93
5.61
64.3
64.3
0.07
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
072
4.89
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.9
4.1
19.28
25.25
3.80
0.00
0.00
5.78
6.21
7.72
68.0
56.7
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
After Tune-up
076
6.09
1.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.3
7.3
19.24
22.55
3.23
1.52
0.00
4.69
5.49
7.00
63.7
63.7
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
078
7.13
0.82
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.0
5.0
22.72
29.79
3.33
1.81
0.00
6.83
8.16
10.61
83.3
52.1
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
TABLE B-7 (Cont'd)
SUMMARY OF EMISSION RESULTS CAR 07 - 1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU, CALIFORNIA
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM
FTP
As Received After Tune-up
Test Number,
WT
071
072 076 078
HFET
As Received After Tune-up
071 072 076 078
Trace Elements
Sodium
Sulfur
Vanadium
Cadmium
Magnesium
Chlorine
Chromium
Copper
Tin
Lead
Aluminum
Potassium
Manganese
Zinc
Antimony
Silicon
Calcium
Iron
Barium
Phosphorus
Titanium
Bronine
Arsenic
Molybdenum
Tungsten
Strontium
Na
S
V
Cd
Mg
Cl
Cr
Cu
Sn
Pb
Al
K
Mn
Zn
Sb
Si
Ca
Fe
Ba
P
Ti
Br
As
Mo
W
Sr
0.07
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.11
0.27
0.01
0.02
0.29
0.18
0.06
0.12 0.11 0.08
0.02 0.01 0.01
0.02 0.01
0.03 0.02 0.01
0.03 0.01
0.03 0.01
0.15 0.01 0.01
0.32 0.08 0.07
0.37 0.08 0.11
0.03 0.01 0.01
0.02
0.04
0.25 0.31 0.24
0.14 0.21 0.17
0.14 0.20 0.69 0.37
0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
0.01 0.01 0.01
0.01 0.01 0.01
0.02
0.01 0.05
0.04 0.06 0.04 0.03
0.09 0.03 0.03
0.01 0.01 0.01
0.25 0.28 0.15
0.07
0.17 0.16 0.07
Note: Nickel, mercury, selenium, cobalt and platinum were analyzed for, but not detected.
-------
TABLE B-8. SUMMARY OF EMISSION RESULTS CAR 08 - 1978 MONTE CARLO
Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
to
i
to
UJ
Test Number, WT
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity, gAm
Temperature, °C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mgAm
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp., °C
Catalyst Max. Temp., °C
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., H/10Q km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Orga..nic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
FTP
As-Received
081
748.5
5.1
25.6
20.64
2.86
291.6
12.68
0.27
3.00
2.00
17.87
5.2
101.0
0.08
0.00
2.73
1.35
0.00
43.39
082
741.7
8.4
25.6
20.95
2.99
295.7
12.87
0.28
3.14
2.18
21.93
5.4
112.8
0.04
0.00
10.74
1.09
0.00
34.32
After Tune -up
086
745.2
10.6
25.0
20.55
1.35
280.0
12.62
0.49
9.01
0.70
37.36
3.1
231.8
0.10
0.00
3.44
1.97
0.00
30.66
087
740.2
12.2
25.0
20.48
—
278.5
12.58
0.55
9.18
0.72
37.95
0.1
247.8
0.04
0.00
4.42
2.21
0.04
32.89
HFET
As-Received
081
747.8
5.7
25.6
13.32
2.57
191.2
8.18
0.07
0.12
2.35
9.64
2.3
20.2
0.03
0.00
2.77
0.34
0.00
19.79
082
743.7
9.2
26.7
14.07
2.59
194.2
8.64
0.06
0.20
2.78
14.93
4.2
23.7
0.01
0.00
3.69
0.06
0.00
17.96
After Tune-up
086
745.2
11.4
26.7
13.90
0.85
197.4
8.54
0.15
1.40
0.79
18.31
0.4
64.3
0.02
0.00
3.91
0.40
0.00
26.68
087
739.9
12.2
25.0
13.94
—
198.1
8.56
0.12
1.31
0.78
14.26
0.8
60.3
0.00
0.00
3.53
0.47
0.00
29.56
-------
TABLE B-8 (Cont'd). SUMMARY OF EMISSION RESULTS CAR 08 - 1978 MONTE CARLO
Emission Rate, mg/km (Except at Noted)
w
i
to
Test Number, WT
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Hexanaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Toluene Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
TrietHylamine
FTP
As-Received
081
5.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.2
1.9
18.70
23.07
6.35
5.82
0.00
9.28
10.81
27.01
101.0
37.4
0.02
0.01
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
082
5.38
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.4
1.9
23.99
26.12
6.70
6.02
0.27
10.14
11.60
27.91
112.8
40.3
0.02
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
After Tune-up
086
2.45
0.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.1
0.6
50.01
49.43
13.06
14.02
0.87
21.15
30.83
52.39
231.8
47.3
0.04
0.05
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
087
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.1
0.0
53122
50.30
13.51
16.71
0.27
22.79
29.75
61.25
247.8
45.1
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
O.OO
HFET
As-Received
081
1.36
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.92
2.3
3.3
6.83
5.78
2.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.84
3.53
20.2
28.9
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
O.OO
082
3.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.92
4.2
7.0
7.85
6.20
2.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.30
5.10
23.7
39.5
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
O.OO
After Tune-up
086
0.36
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.4
0.3
20.63
14.27
5.29
0.00
0.00
5.67
6.97
11.46
64.3
42.9
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
O.OO
087
0.84
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.8
0.7
21.72
11.56
5.68
0.00
0.00
4.77
6.87
9.68
60.3
50.3
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
-------
TABLE B-8 (Cont'd). SUMMARY OF EMISSION RESULTS CAR 08 - 1978 MONTE CARLO
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM
Test Number, WT
Trace Elements
Sodium
Sulfur
Vanadium
Cadmium
Magnesium
Chlorine
Chromium
Copper
Tin
Lead
i Aluminum
ui Potassium
Manganese
Zinc
Antimony
Silicon
Calcium
Iron
Barium
Phosphorus
Titanium
Bronine
Arsenic
Molybdenum
Tungsten
Strontium
Na
S
V
Cd
Mg
Cl
Cr
Cu
Sn
Pb
Al
K
Mn
Zn
Sb
Si
Ca
Fe
Ba
P
Ti
Br
As
Mo
W
Sr
FTP
As Received After Tune-up
081 082 086 087
0.07 0.04 0.02 0.03
0.01
0.01 0.01 0.01
0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
0.01 0.01
0.05 0.02 0.01 0.02
0.02 0.01
0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01
0.06 0.05 0.03 0.06
0.82 0.16 0.08 0.10
0.01
0.02
0.15 0.18 0.18 0.27
0.04 0.05
0.12 0.12 0.14 0.13
HFET
As Received
081 082
0.08 0.31
0.01
0.0.
0.02 0.01
0.06
0.01
0.12 0.02
0.23 0.05
0.01
0.01
0.11
0.06
After Tune-up
086
0.05
0.04
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.04
0.11
0.01
0.01
0.07
087
0.03
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.03
0.03
0.01
0.29
0.06
0.17
Note: Nickel, mercury, selenium, cobalt and platinum were analyzed for, but not detected
-------
TABLE B-9. SUMMARY OF EMISSION RESULTS CAR 09 - 1978 FORD FIESTA
Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
w
i
to
Test Number,
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
WT
mm Eg
g/km
°C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Catalyst Avg. Temp., °C
Catalyst Max. Temp., °C
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., H/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Othe r Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
FTP
As-Received
091
738.
12.
23.
12.
7.
177.
7.
0.
1.
1.
38.
0.
92.
0.
0.
2.
0.
0.
8.
1
7
9
60
54
7
74
38
57
91
78
0
4
03
00
72
24
00
08
092
745.
9.
25.
12.
7.
177.
7.
0.
1.
1.
31.
3.
106.
0.
0.
2.
0.
0.
10.
5
9
0
57
44
0
72
41
62
81
39
4
6
02
00
14
17
00
69
After Tune-up
096
734.
13.
23.
12.
7.
175.
7.
0.
1.
1.
33.
1.
104.
0.
0.
2.
0.
0.
6.
1
6
9
39
43
1
61
34
38
80
42
3
9
01
00
19
35
00
54
HFET
As-Received
091
739.
12.
25.
8.
6.
119.
5.
0.
0.
2.
25.
0.
29.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
5.
1
2
0
37
78
9
14
14
09
06
19
0
7
00
00
77
,29
.00
,38
092
745.
10.
24.
8.
7.
120.
5.
0.
0.
2.
33.
5
2
4
38
00
0
15
14
12
09
72
1.8
31.0
0.00
0.00
1.97
0.21
0.00
8.18
After Tune -up
096
733.
12.
26.
8.
7.
117.
5.
0.
0.
1.
19.
2,
0,
0
2
0
0
5
6
6
1
17
07
2
02
10
08
77
86
.4
.00
.00
.49
.31
.00
.64
-------
TABLE B-9 (Cont'd). SUMMARY OF EMISSION RESULTS CAR 09 - 1978 FORD FIESTA
Emission Rate, mg/km (Except at Noted)
w
i
to
Test Number, WT
Aldehydes and Ketones
FormaIdehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Hexanaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Toluene Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
FTP
As-Received
091
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
22.69
24.65
9.38
5.83
1.04
4.56
6.86
17.41
92.4
24.3
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
092
3.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.4
0.8
26.43
24.86
10.21
7.73
0.00
5.57
8.78
23.05
106.6
26.0
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
After Tune-up
096
1.34
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.3
0.4
32.90
25.00
10.27
4.95
0.00
4.44
6.13
21.25
104.9
30.9
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
As-Received
091
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00.
0.0
0.0
7.15
14.94
4.09
0.00
0.03
1.42
2.08
0.00
29.7
21.2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
092
1.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.8
1.3
5.18
14.46
4.14
0.00
0.00
2.26
2.10
2.89
31.0
22.1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
After Tune-up
096
2.45
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.4
2.4
__
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-------
TABLE B-9 (Cont'd). SUMMARY OF EMISSION RESULTS CAR 09 - 1978 FORD FIESTA
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM
Test Number, WT
Trace Elements
Barium Ba
Phosphorus P
Titanium Ti
Bronine Br
Arsenic As
Molybdenum Mo
Tungsten
Strontium
W
Sr
FTP
As Received
091
092
After Tune-up
096
0.02
HFET
As Received
0.21 0.29 0.18 0.11 0.23
0.05
0.13 0.17 0.16 0.08 0.15 0.07
Note: Nickel, mercury, selenium, cobalt and platinum were analyzed for, but not detected.
091
092
ro
i
to
co
Sodium
Sulfur
Vanadium
Cadmium
Magnesium
Chlorine
Chromium
Copper
Tin
Lead
Aluminum
Potassium
Manganese
Zinc
Antimony
Silicon
Calcium
Iron
Na
S
V
Cd
Mg
Cl
Cr
Cu
Sn
Pb
Al
K
Mn
Zn
Sb
Si
Ca
Fe
0.18 0.
0.
0.
0.
0.01 0.
0.06 0.
0.08 0.
34
01
01
01
02
06
02
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
08
01
01
01
04
08
19
2.06 2.55
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.01 0.01
0.02 0.03
After Tune-up
096
0.47
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.03
-------
TABLE B-10. SUMMARY OF EMISSION RESULTS CAR 10 - 1978 CHRYSLER NEW YORKER
Emission Rate, mg/km (Except as Noted)
Test Number, WT
Barometer, mm Hg
Humidity, gAm
Temperature, °C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
°C
°C
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Cat alys t Avg. Temp.,
Catalyst Max. Temp.,
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., &/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons, (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide S Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
FTP
As-Received
101
744.7
12.6
25.6
31.45
—
384.6
19.32
2.84
37.60
2.28
264.23
19.8
1262.1
0.03
0.00
3.29
1.91
0.25
12.94
102
740.2
13.1
28.3
33.26
1.59
401.6
20.43
11.00
26.84
2.69
195.43
9.8
1929.9
0.05
0.01
1.30
0.79
0.42
20.26
After Tune-up
106
737.
11.
25.
29.
1.
404.
18.
0.
9.
1.
84.
10.
555.
0.
0.
3.
0.
0.
12.
9
2
6
39
40
6
05
84
98
84
49
2
7
02
00
21
27
39
29
107
736.
12.
23.
28.
1.
398.
17.
0.
10.
1.
82.
1.
385.
0.
0.
5.
0.
0.
13.
HFET
As-Received
101
6
2
3
98
11
2
80
81
31
92
32
8
5
03
00
39
19
15
57
744
11
31
19
-
282
12
0
2
1
71
8
290
0
0
1
0
0
13
.7
.8
.1
.94
-
.1
.25
.38
.33
.49
.46
.1
.2
.01
.00
.77
.12
.13
.01
102
740.2
10.8
30.0
21.60
3.82
294.6
13.27
3.85
2.64
1.83
112.49
34.7
772.9
0.02
0.05
0.98
0.19
0.00
11.20
After Tune-up
106
737
10
26
19
1
279
11
0
0
1
60
4
67
0
0
3
0
0
7
.9
.0
.7
.52
.85
.5
.99
.14
.61
.15
.92
.2
.6
.05
.00
.71
.10
.00
.78
107
737.4
11.3
25.6
19.44
1.70
278.2
11.94
0.15
0.72
1.31
62.86
0.0
74.8
0.01
0.00
0.84
0.14
0.11
9.28
-------
TABLE B-10 (Cont'd). SUMMARY OF EMISSION RESULTS CAR 10 - 1978 CHRYSLER NEW YORKER
Emission Rate, mg/km. (Except at Noted)
w
I
UJ
o
Test Number, WT
Aldehydes and Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methylethylketone
Hexanaldehyde
Aldehydes and Ketones
Total as % of THC, %
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Toluene Individual HC
Total as % of THC, %
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoe thy1amine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triettiy lamine
FTP
As-Received
101
17.01
2.82
0.00
0.00
0.00
19.8
0.7
293.46
301.62
33.92
129.05
0.98
105.46
130.88
266.75
1262.1
44.4
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.oo
102
8.
0.
0.
0.
0.
9.
0.
248.
178.
24.
69.
1.
87.
266.
99
83
00
00
00
8
1
53
22
92
73
81
47
97
1052.27
1929.
17.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
o.
9
5
03
02
00
00
00
01
00
00
00
After Tune-up
106
9.
0.
0.
0.
0.
10.
1.
83.
254.
20.
29.
0.
38.
42.
88.
555.
66.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
o.
86
35
00
00
00
2
2
07
75
10
06
00
25
08
34
7
2
02
02
00
00
00
00
00
00
oo
107
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
88.
89.
19.
23.
5.
39.
41.
78.
385.
47.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
o.
76
00
00
00
00
8
2
38
48
41
03
54
34
98
29
5
6
02
02
00
00
00
00
00
00
oo
HFET
As-Received
101
6.44
1.66
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.1
2.1
74.68
70.75
13.19
24.00
0.00
27.60
31.01
48.94
290.2
76.4
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.oo
102
33.81
0.91
0.00
0.00
0.00
34.7
0.9
50.28
160.66
13.15
6.39
0.00
151.84
98.32
292.25
772.9
20.1
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
o. oo
After Tune-up
106
3.
0.
0.
0.
0.
4.
3.
16.
15.
4.
3.
0.
7.
7.
13.
67.
48,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o.
36
79
00
00
00
2
0
93
57
15
11
00
02
27
55
,6
.3
.02
.03
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
107
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0
0.0
21.48
18.86
4.64
4.70
0.00
5.86
7.16
12.06
74.8
49.9
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.oo
-------
TABLE B-10 (Cont'd). SUMMARY OF EMISSION RESULTS CAR 10 - 1978 CHRYSLER NEW YORKER
EMISSION RATE, MG/KM
Test Number, WT
Trace Elements
Sodium
Sulfur
Vanadium
Cadmium
Magnesium
Chlorine
Chromium
Copper
Tin
Lead
Aluminum
Potassium
Manganese
Zinc-
Antimony
Silicon
Calcium
Iron
Barium
Phosphorus
Titanium
Bromine
Arsenic
Molybdenum
Tungsten
Strontium
Na
S
V
Cd
Mg
Cl
Cr
Cu
Sn
Pb
Al
K
Mn
Zn
Sb
Si
Ca
Fe
Ba
P
Ti
Br
As
Mo
W
Sr
FTP
HFET
As Received
101
102
After Tune-up
106 107
As Received
101
102
After Tune-up
106 107
0.25
1.06
0.02
0.01
0.34
0.41
0.03
0.03
0.80
0.13
0.01
0.16
1.75
0.01
0.35
1.80
8.57
0.01
1.13
0.01
0.02
0.52
0.13
0.32
0.26
1.50
0.01
0.01
0.40
0.50
0.04
0.03
1.18
0.29
0.01
0.41
2.14
0.01
0.45
2.06
9.88
0.01
1.27
0.01
0.03
0.49
0.12
0.28
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
10
29
01
11
08
01
01
15
05
45
48
22
17
12
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
27
01
12
08
09
02
25
06
60
39
30
38
07
20
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
04
70
08
19
12
03
06
29
172
39
81
24
13
14
0.14
0.86
0.01
0.17
0.52
0.01
0.47
0.15
0.20
0.79
2.57
0.89
6.65
0.01
0.50
0.01
0.06
0.07
0.28
0.18
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
06
31
01
03
05
01
07
40
18
28
07
06
43
06
21
1.44
0.06
0.09
0.01
0.18
0.49
0.28
0.47
0.17
0.15
0.09
Note: Nickel, mercury, selenium, cobalt and platinum were analyzed for, but not detected.
-------
APPENDIX C
FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE RESULTS
-------
TABLE C-l. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
CAR 01 AS-RECEIVED
Test Oil
Emissions in mg/km
?
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine +dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
19
25
2
13
0
10
13
22
COLD-UDDS
60.42
18.92
2.32
0.00
6.80
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.02
0.00
0.00
Emissions
COLD-UDDS
1 2
.34 4.54
.13 9.93
.92 1.25
.61 0.13
.16 0.00
.55 4.69
.57 5.67
.39 9.69
HOT-UDDS
21.69
3.83
1.09
0.00
5.18
0.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.23
0.10
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
in ppm
HOT-UDDS
3
4.22
8.93
1.66
0.31
0.00
4.18
4.81
7.21
4
2.86
4.58
0.93
0.00
0.00
2.14
3.59
3.93
Emissions?" iiTTng/km
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides fi Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine + dimethylamine
Trime thylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
0.64
0.84
1.33
0.76
V
1
15.
19.
2.
10.
0.
8.
11.
19.
0.
COLD-UDDS
25.14
3.12
3.70
0.00
9.52
0.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.29
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Emissions
COLD-UDDS
2
40 3.53
96 6.95
73 1.38
69 0.00
17 0.07
39 3.40
64 7.31
,08 7.35
25 0.81
HOT-UDDS
23.31
1.68
1.34
0.00
13.46
4.48
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
in ppm
HOT-UDDS
3
3.74
6.13
1.73
0.35
0.07
2.86
3.82
4.73
1.00
4
2.36
2.62
1.07
0.00
0.08
1.18
2.70
2.23
0.60
-------
9
00
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes £ Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Met'hyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monome thylami ne
Monoethylamine + dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
TABLE C-2. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
CAR 02 AS-RECEIVED
Test 021
Emissions in mg/km
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monoree thylami ne
Monoethylamine + dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Test 022
Emissions in nig/km
1
14.85
7.39
2.01
5.49
0.16
2.51
4.53
7.47
COLD-UDDS
25.26
8.45
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.47
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.od
0.00
0.00
0.00
Emissions
COLD-HDDS
2
5.29
1.37
1.19
0.00
0.12
0.00
0.33
0.45
HOT-UDDS
16.37
5.38
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
in ppm
HOT-UDDS
3
6.83
3.57
1.76
0.00
0.09
0.86
1.27
2.04
4
6.07
1.24
1.44
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.30
0.12
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
1
14.
6.
1.
4.
0.
2.
4.
6.
COLD-UDDS
9.37
5.46
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.26
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00'
0.00
o.oo
0.00
Emissions
COLD-UDDS
2
16 5.35
86 0.91
86 1.17
21 0.00
11 0.04
41 0.00
42 0.34
89 0.71
HOT-HDDS
16.28
27.16
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
in ppm
HOT-UDDS
3
5.82
2.74
1.62
0.00
0.04
0.76
1.13
1.61
4
5.03
1.11
1.11
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.44
0.00
2.09
1.32
3.04
1.14
2.24
1.31
3.31
1.43
-------
TABLE C-3. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
CAR 03 AS-RECEIVED
Test 031
Emissions in mg/kin
Test 032
Emissions in mg/km
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides 6 Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monome thylami ne
Monoethylamine +dimethylamine
Trime thylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
COLD-UDDS
21.01
2.85
0.17
0.00
HOT-UDDS
32.36
0.40
0.02
0.00
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
11
6
2
4
0
2
4
9
0.30
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Emissions
COLD-UDDS
1 2
.95 3.95
.00 0.72
.25 1.32
.97 0.00
.10 0.00
.00 0.00
.54 1.10
.71 1.40
in ppm
1.27
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HOT-UDDS
3
6.90
2.27
1.86
0.00
0.00
0.57
1.49.
2.99
4
4.74
0.00
0.00
0.82
0.00
0.00
0.52
0.23
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides fi Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monome thylami ne
Monoethylamine + dimethylamine
Trime thylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
2.75
1.30
2.19
1.12
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
N20
1
12.25
5.05
2.11
3.49
0.07
1.68
3.99
8.11
COLD-UDDS
19.26
0.12
0.00
4.11
1.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00'
0.08
0.00
0.00
Emissions
COLD-UDDS
2
5.64
0.46
1.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.51
0.74
HOT-UDDS
20.44
0.01
0.00
1.95
0.87
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.16
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
in ppm
HOT-UDDS
3
10.51
3.19
1.76
0.00
0.00
0.65
1.96
3.04
4
7.24
0.17
0.87
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.42
0.44
3.26
1.25
2.48
0.93
-------
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes s Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine + dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
TABLE C-4. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
CAR 03 AFTER TUNEUP
Test 036
Emissions in mg/km
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides fi Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes & Ketones
FormaIdehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monome thylamine
Monoethylamine + dimethylaraine
Trime thylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
1
7.
4.
1.
2.
0.
1.
3.
9.
COLD-UDDS
22.67
4.06
0.37
0.00
2.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
o.oo
0.01
0.00
0.00
Emissions
COLD-UDDS
2
13 6.28
33 0.59
75 1.22
68 0.00
23 0.16
87 0.00
43 0.38
45 0.81
HOT-UDDS
13.52
6.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
in ppm
HOT-UDDS
3 4
10.06 7.70
2.84 0.22
1.71 1.05
0.00 0.00
0.17 0.20
0.49 0.00
1.37 0.20
2.72 0.30
Test 037
Emissions in mg/km
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
COLD-UDDS
18.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
65
53
30
00
88
00
00
95
00
07
02
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Emissions
COLD-UDDS
1
10.04
5.06
1.75
4.30
0.02
1.93
4.03
10.72
2
7.20
0.53
1.10
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.94
0.87
HOT-UDDS
10.90
1.94
0.62
0.00
0.21
0.00
0.00
2.43
0.00
0.07
0.05
0.00
0.00
O.OQ
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
in ppm
HOT-UDDS
3
10.02
2.69
1.64
0.00
0.00
0.55
1.49
2.66
4
8.52
0.15
0.87
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.54
0.15
3.48
1.58
2.30
0.00
2.99
1.23
2.29
0.79
-------
n
CTi
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides S Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Moncroethylamine
Monoethylamine +dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
TABLE C-5. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
CAR 04 AS-RECEIVED
Test 041
Emissions in mg/tan
COLD-UDDS
45
4
0
0
7
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.75
.67
.84
.00
.73
.34
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
Emissions
COLD-UDDS
16
19
5
5
0
7
8
19
1
.67
.37
.21
.16
.42
.92
.67
.13
2
8.88
3.06
3.45
0.00
0.25
0.96
2.47
3.50
HOT-UDDS
26
12
0
0
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
in. ppm
.80
.69
.35
.00
.13
.46
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
HOT-UDDS
3
17.27
16.57
4.94
7.39
0.28
5.43
7.61.
15.67
4
8.44
2.92
3.32
0.00
0.23
0.90
1.80
3.04
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides S Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monome thy1ami ne
Monoethylamine + dimethylamine
Trime thylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Test 042
Emissions in mg/km
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
COLD-UDDS
45.68
0.56
0.51
0.00
4.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HOT-UDDS
31.11
1.11
0.84
0.00
4.46
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Emissions in ppm
COLD-UDDS
HOT-UDDS
16.20
20.61
5.54
3.68
0.34
8.48
8.90
19.16
9.26
3.47
3.64
0.00
0.22
1.15
2.03
3.40
15.87
14.22
4.75
5.10
0.23
5.09
6.58
13.66
8.48
3.33
3.41
0.00
0.12
0.92
1.39
1.90
0.21
0.10
0.34
0.13
0.16
O.'IO
0.47
0.16
-------
TABLE C-6. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSION RESULTS
CAR 04 AFTER TUNEUP
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Test 046
Emissions in ng/km
COLD-POPS
42.49
3.35
1.32
0.00
HOT-UDDS
45.68
3.40
0.73
0.00
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
7.14
1.96
0.00
7.54
1.46
0.00
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine +dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Tr i e thy 1 ami ne
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Emissions in ppm
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
COLD-UDDS
1
27.31
22.67
5.64
28.95
0.21
8.97
11.16
26.10
2
6.35
4.00
3.59
0.00
0.07
1.06
1.71
4.18
HOT-UDDS
3
10.30
11.97
4.32
1.37
0.04
3.82
4.19
9.08
4
5.80
3.56
3.19
0.00
0.00
0.85
1.27
2.49
N.O
0.16
0.07
0.30
0.11
-------
TABLE C-7. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
CAR 05 AS-PECEIVED
Total Particulate
Ainmoni a
Cyanides S Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes s Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethyland ne
Monoethylamine + dimethylamine
Trime thylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
N2O
Test 051
Emissions in ing/km
7
6
1
2
0
3
4
8
COLD-UDDS
10.33
13.77
0.48
0.00
5.74
0.69
12.24
0.00
0.00
0.27
0.04
0.04
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Emissions
COLD-UDDS
1 2
.44 3.74
.90 3.60
.77 1.03
.87 0.00
.19 0.00
.22 1.41
.96 2.91
.20 3.27
HOT-UDDS
3.83
21.63
0.67
0.00
1.39
0.57
7.15
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
in ppm
HOT-UDDS
3
5.06
3.81
1.35
0.00
0.11
1.46
3.00
3.82
4
3.79
4.54
1.12
0.00
0.15
1.75
3.17
3.60
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes & Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine + dimethylamine
Trime thylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Test 052
Emissions in mg/km
1
7.
7.
1.
2.
0.
3.
5.
8.
COLD-UDDS
9.87
18.76
0.91
0.00
0.55
1.80
6.95
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Emissions
COLD-UDDS
2
47 3.77
30 3.66
71 1.02
33 0.00
11 0.04
47 1.60
01 3.21
,09 3.68
HOT-UDDS
10.31
20.62
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.52
0.00
0.00.
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
in ppm
HOT-UDDS
3
4.89
3.35
1.23
0.00
0.00
1.39
2.84
3.02
4
3.61
3.15
0.97
0.00
0.04
1.38
2.74
2.37
5.24
1.43
6.11
1.62
6.24
1.31
8.41
1.47
-------
o
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Mdehydes s Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monome thylami ne
Monoethylamine + dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Tr i e thy1ami ne
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
TABLE C-8. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
CAR 05 AFTER TUNEUP
Test 056
Emissions in mg/km
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes s Ketones
FormaIdehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monome thylami ne
Monoethylamine + dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Tr i e thy 1 ami ne
6
6
1
1
0
3
4
9
COLD-UDDS
24.53
1.01
0.00
0.84
0.66
1.29
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
o.ob
0.00
0.00
0.00
Emissions
COLD-UDDS
1 2
.89 4.11
.54 4.23
.63 1.09
.68 0.00
.73 0.00
.20 1.72
.48 3.16
.02 4.81
HOT-UDDS
4.06
30.61
0.96
0.00
0.00
0.45
3.35
0.40
0.00
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
in ppm
HOT-UDDS
3
5.10
3.34
1.27
0.00
0.00
1.42
2.69
3.78
4
3.65
3.80
1.08
0.00
0.00
1.59
2.82
3.83
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Test 057
Emissions in mg/km
1
7.
6.
1.
2.
0.
2.
4.
8.
COLD-UDDS
3.05
30.72
0.72
0.00
1.07
1.53
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
Emissions
COLD-UDDS
2
03 3.47
22 2.33
64 0.92
31 0.00
17 0.00
93 0.96
39 2.33
27 2.49
HOT-ODDS
1.24
38.20
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.77
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
in ppm
HOT-UDDS
3
4.77
2.43
1.19
0.00
0.00
1.00
2.25
2.74
4
3.35
2.24
0.88
0.00
0.00
0.84
1.98
1.77
7.28
1.74
8.26
2.04
7.30
1.59
7.07
1.70
-------
TABLE C-9. FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
CAR 0.6 AS-RECEIVED
Test 061
Emissions in mg/km
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine + dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
N20
1
12.
18.
2.
7.
0.
8.
9.
19.
COLD-UDDS
21.68
17.50
6.71
0.00
1.63
2.66
0.00
0.51
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Emissions
COLD-UDDS
2
49 3.04
46 3.09
30 0.99
80 0.00
17 0.00
08 1.41
73 2.80
78 4.21
HOT-UDDS
15.80
15.62
5.60
0.00
0.42
1.36
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
in ppm
HOT-UDDS
3
5.00
7.23
1.45
0.33
0.00
3.09
3.58
5.83
4
2.26
1.56
0.77
0.00
0.00
0.70
1.44
2.14
Test 062
Emissions in mg/km
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides S Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes s, Ketones^
FormaIdehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monome thylami ne
Monoethylamine + diraethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
COLD-UDDS
25.61
12.59
7.29
0.00
1.83
3.43
0.00
0.63
0.00
0.05 .
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
•Emissions
COLD-UDDS
1 2
14
19
2
12
0
a
10
22
.06 2.37
.01 1.68
.22 0.68
.35 0.00
.28 0.00
.08 0.83
.81 2.25
.21 3.64
HOT-UDDS
16.15
9.08
4.07
0.00
0.93
1.56
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
in ppm
HOT-UDDS
3
3.20
4.00
1.00
0.07
0.00
1.91
2.46
4.28
4
2.01
0.72
0.57
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.99
1.59
2.78
4.16
5.94
4.03
2.64
5.25
6.67
4.11
-------
TABLE C-10.
FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
CAR 06 AFTER TUNEUP
Test 066
Emissions in mg/km
Teat 067
Emissions in mg/km
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides S Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Mdehydes & Ketones
FormaIdehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine + dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
N2O
1
12.87
15.58
2.20
9.35
0.30
6.50
8.72
16.36
COLD-UDDS
13.53
10.42
2.87
0.00
2.21
2.70
0.00
0.49
0.00
0,04
0.00
0.02
0,00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Emissions
COLD-UDDS
2
2.90
1.17
0.79
0.00
0.20
0.27
1.48
2.06
HOT-UDDS
12.21
8.39
1.41
0.00
1.32
1.19
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.03
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
in ppm
HOT-UDDS
3 4
5.89 2.
5.63 1.
1.42 0.
0.30 0.
0.30 0.
2.03 0.
2.87 1.
4.39 0.
60
21
93
00
28
36
10
87
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine + dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
1.72
1.00
3.02
0.99
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
N2O
1
16.47
16.85
2.17
14.16
0.41
6.88
11.02
25.63
COLD-UDDS
33.94
4.83
2.20
0.20
1.71
1.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Emissions
COLD-UDDS
2
2.80
1.00
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.39
1.28
2.11
HOT-ODDS
14.10
3.95
1.72
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
in ppm
HOT-UDDS
3
3.57
4.97
1.23
0.00
0.02
2.01
2.81
4.68
4
0.34
1.09
0.69
0.00
0.01
0.35
1.09
1.92
1.26
0.79
2.00
0.74
-------
TABLE C-ll.
FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
CAR 07 AS-RECEIVED
Test 071
Emissions in mg/km
Test 072
Emissions in mg/km
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides fi Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethyland ne
Monoethylamine + dimethylaraine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
COLD-UDDS
19.07
5.19
1.25
0.00
8.69
3.62
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.04
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HOT-UDDS
33.38
1.65
0.17
0.00
4.83
1.93
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides fi Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monome thylaraine
Monoethylamine + dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
COLD-UDDS
38.02
1.93
1.01
0.00
6.54
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HOT-UDDS
31.57
2.22
0.59
0.00
6.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Kthylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Emissions in ppm
COLD-UDDS
0.19
0.00
HOT-UDDS
0.03
0.04
Individual Hydrocarbons
10.70
12.24
1.78
4.03
0.19
4.42
5.11
10.62
6.39
2.79
0.93
0.32
0.10
0.78
1.34
2.06
6.88
4.95
1.22
0.51
0.13
1.52
2.14
2.76
7.22
2.63
0.97
0.36
0.00
0.96
1.23
1.84
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
N2°
Emissions in ppm
COLD-UDDS
0.22
0.00
HOT-UDDS
0.08
10.49
13.60
1.90
4.39
0.16
5.51
6.70
14.92
7.60
2.75
0.93
0.00
0.00
0.86
1.54
2.46
6.94
5.41
1.17
0.48
0.00
1.54
2.52
3.77
7.00
2.71
0.92
0.28
0.00
0.79
1.34
1.91
0.00
-------
TABLE C-12.
FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
CAR 07 AFTER TUNEUP
Test 076
Emissions in mg/km
Test 078
Emissions in mg/km
total Particulate
mmonia
yanides & Cyanogen
ydrogen Sulfide
Idehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine + dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
1
9.
13.
1.
3.
0.
5.
6.
12.
0.
COLD-UDDS
38.81
16.00
0.12
0.00
„
—
—
—
—
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Emissions
COLD-UDDS
2
93 5.98
49 2.93
82 0.88
94 0.28
00 0.00
31 0.70
07 1.31
42 2.17
22 0.01
HOT-UDDS
in ppm
28.48
13.38
0.02
0.00
7.15
1.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HOT-UDDS
3
6.13
4.80
1.04
0.48
0.00
1.44
1.95
2.95
0.11
4
5.85
3.03
0.89
0.29
0.00
0.76
1.30
1.81
0.10
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine + dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
N2°
COLD-UDDS
49.86
14.23
0.54
0.00
8.42
1.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Emissions
COLD-UDDS
1
10.04
13.91
1.63
3.32
0.06
5.34
6.39
12.06
2
3.93
3.07
0.66
0.00
0.02
0.78
1.29
2.21
HOT-HDDS
38.09
8.30
0.42
0.00
7.13
0.63
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
in ppm
HOT-UDDS
3
5.88
6.45
0.95
0.36
0.00
1.81
2.59
4.57
4
3.92
3.00
0.64
0.13
0.00
0.71
1.16
1.57
0.11
0.01
0.05
0.01
-------
TABLE C-13.
FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
CAR 08 AS-RECEIVED
Test 081
Emissions in mg/km
Test 082
Emissions in mg/km
n
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monoine thy lami ne
Monoethylamine + dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
N20
1
4.28
9.53
1.17
3.91
0.00
4.52
4.77
11.24
COLD-UDDS
25.37
1.85
2.14
0.00
4.73
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.02
0.12
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Emissions
COLD-ODDS
2
0.31
0.29
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.73
HOT-UDDS
12.22
3.40
0.76
0.00
5.63
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
in ppm
HOT-UDDS
3 4
1.66 0.66
2.94 0.20
0.64 0.26
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.94 0.00
1.63 0.00
3.88 0.15
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine + dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
2.31
0.89
2.34
0.67
, Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
N2°
1
6.11
11.23
1.34
4.13
0.16
5.11
5.68
13.23
COLD-UDDS
30.00
4.16
2.04
0.00
6.96
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.04
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Emissions
COLD-UDDS
2
0.87
0.34
0.44
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.16
0.99
HOT-UDDS
15.85
15.71
0.37
0.00
4.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
in ppm
HOT-UDDS
3 4
2.37 0.59
3.19 0.27
0.75 0.38
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
1.04 0.00
1,52 0.00
3.05 0.00
1.47
0.75
2.08
0.55
-------
TABLE C-14.
FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
CAR 08 AFTER TUNEUP
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides S Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine + dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Tr i e thy 1 ami ne
Test 086
Emissions in mg/km
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
N20
COLD-UDDS
49
3
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.39
.28
.20
.00
.50
.00
,00
.00
.00
.01
.06
.00
.00
,00
.00
,00
.00
.00
Emissions
COLD- ODDS
1
11.75
15.44
2.09
9.46
0.26
6.52
9.35
17.14
2
2.37
1.78
0.95
0.00
0.00
0.79
2.18
2.70
HOT-UDDS
28
3
1
0
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
in ppm
.28
.56
.80
.00
.17
.05
.00
.00
.00
.06
.04
.01
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
HOT-UDDS
3
4.44
7.15
1.42
0.00
0.18
3.09
3.71
6.68
4
2.07
1.40
0.87
0.00
0.00
0.61
1.29
1.91
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides fi Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monome thylami ne
Monoethylamine + dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Tr i e thy 1 ami ne
Test 087
Emissions in mg/km
COLD-UDDS
50.03
4.52
2.68
0.10
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HOT-UDDS
28.83
4.34
1.86
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Emissions in ppm
0.98
0.60
1.95
0.62
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
N2°
COLD-UDDS
1
13.03
16.53
2.16
11.43
0.15
7.67
9.05
21.34
2
2.60
1.87
1.03
0.00
0.00
0.83
1.73
2.97
HOT-UDDS
3
4.57
6.67
1.45
0.00
0.00
2.96
3.77
7.68
4
2.19
1.47
0.94
0.00
0.00
0.63
1.45
2.11
0.84
0.84
2.09
0.61
-------
TABLE C-15.
FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
CAR 09 AS-RECEIVED
Test 091
Emissions in mg/km
Test 092
Emissions in mg/km
Total Particulate
Ajnmonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine + dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
COLD-UDDS
39.82
4.48
0.44
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.o'o
0.00
0.00
0.00
HOT-UDDS
38.00
1.40
0.26
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides S Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monome thy1ami ne
Monoethylamine + dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
COLD-UDDS
36.90
2.69
0.33
0.00
3.99
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HQT-UDDS
27.23
1.72
0.05
0.00
2.93
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
N20
Emissions in ppm
Emissions in ppm
COLD-UDDS
1
5.22
5.67
1.15
4.03
0.12
1.67
2.67
7.65
2
1.10
1.32
0.76
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.48
HOT-UDDS
3
1.64
3.86
1.03
0.00
0.14
0.92
1.10
2.54
4
1.02
1.17
0.76
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.25
0.00
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
0.32
0.13
0.47
0.15
N2°
COLD-ODDS
1
6.19
5.52
1.19
5.22
0.00
1.78
2.91
8.83
2
1.38
1.15
0.88 .
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.35
0.76
HOT-UDDS
3
1.74
f4.25
1.08
0.00
0.00
1.28
1.45
3.93
4
1.18
1.07
0.81
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.00
0.47
0.16
0.60
0.20
-------
TABLE C-16.
FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
CAR 09 AFTER TUNEUP
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Test 096
Emissions in mg/km
COLD-UDDS
37.38
2.87
0.48
0.00
HOT-UDDS
30.44
1.67
0.26
0.00
1.12
0.00
0.00
1.51
0.00
0.00
n
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine + dimethylamine
Trime thylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Emissions in ppm
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
COLD-UDDS
1
5.57
6.04
1.30
3.40
0.22
1.89
2.66
7.98
2
2.28
1.27
0.86
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.60
HOT-UDDS
3
2.36
3.67
1.04
o-.oo
0.00
0.71
1.17
3.06
4
2.28
1.27
0.86
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.60
N-,0
0.34
0.13
0.46
0.01
-------
TABLE C-17.
FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
CAR 10 AS-RECEIVED
Test 101
Emissions in mg/km
Test 102
Emissions in mg/kjn
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
I Organic Amines
'""' Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine + dimethylamine
Trime thylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
COLD-UDDS
177.09
3.71
0.92
0.25
19.80
4.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HOT-UDDS
329.96
2.97
2.65
0.25
14.91
1.86
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides S Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine + dimethylamine
Trime thylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
COLD-UDDS
160.89
3.08
0.91
0.42
15.28
1.94
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0'2
0.00
0.00
0.00
HOT-UDDS
221.48
3.31
0.70
0.42
4.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
N,0
Emissions in ppm
COLD-UDDS
1
36.62
38.56
4.64
27.84
0.37
18.15
23.36
58.10
2
24.97
29.41
2.80
10.39
0.00
9.08
12.91
25.55
HOT-UDDS
3
25.74
30.62
3.38
20.93
0.15
10.89
14,22
22.77
4
21.25
27.40
2.73
6.57
0.00
8.33
11.05
20.95
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
0.68
0.00
0.58
0.42
N20
Emissions in ppm
COLD-UDDS
0.55
0.58
HOT-UDDS
0.76
45.95
36.97
4.33
33.99
0.44
18.23
54.45
202.84
20.20
15.71
1.96
0.00
0.17
7.07
22.78
84.55
20.50
21.47
2.57
10.14
0.26
10.32
41.05
157.98
11.97
9.04
1.61
0.00
0.00
5.03
14.91
63.27
0.54
-------
TABLE C-18.
FTP INDIVIDUAL SAMPLE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
CAR 10 AFTER TUNEUP
'otal Particulate
Jnmonia
'yanides £ Cyanogen
iydrogen Sulfide
.Idehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monome thylami ne
Monoethylamine +dimethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Test 106
Emissions in mg/km
COLD-UDDS
77.35
0.94
0.01
0.24
12.77
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HOT-UDDS
89.88
2.39
0.46
0.51
7.67
0.61
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.02
C.OO
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Emissions in ppm
Total Particulate
Ammonia
Cyanides S Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Isobutyraldehyde
Methyl ethyl ketone
Hexanaldehyde
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl sulfide
Methyl sulfide
Ethyl sulfide
Methyl disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine H- dimethylamine
Trime thylamine
Diethylamine
Triethy1amine
Test 107
Emissions in mg/km
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
COLD-UDDS
18
27
3
13
0
12
12
26
0
1
.83
.43
.70
.41
.00
.67
.71
.49
.40
2
4
5
1
0
0
2
3
7
0
.64
.88
.74
.00
.00
.89
.58
.64
.29
3
8.
12.
1.
5.
0.
5.
5.
11.
0.
HOT-UDDS
07
03
80
09
00
27
93
15
52
4
3.
1.
I.
0.
0.
0.
1.
2.
0.
07
43
32
00
00
00
07
73
28
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
N 0
2
21
28
3
12
0
12
13
26
COLD-UDDS
86.99
5.55
0.26
0.22
3.89
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Emissions
COLD-UDDS
1 2
.00 5.56
.75 5.58
.55 1.73
.43 0.00
.00 0.00
.15 2.79
.16 3.37
.01 7.01
HOT-UDDS
78.80
2.32
0.13
0.10
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
in ppm
HOT-UDDS
3 4
6.79 3.
9.95 2.
1.69 1.
2.70 0.
0.00 1.
4.14 1.
4.84 1.
8.17 2.
82
75
30
00
51
31
67
19
0.45
0.29
0.75
0.25
-------
APPENDIX D
COMPUTER PRINTOUTS OF THE
REGULATED EMISSIONS TEST RESULTS
-------
TABLE D-l. TEST NO. Oil EMISSION RESULTS
FTP
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-007
TEST NO. 011FTP RUN 1
VEHICLE MODa 78 BUICIt REGAL
ENGINE 5.0 1(305. CID) V-B
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 737.3? HN HG(27.1l IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 37. PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUH8ER
DESCRIPTION
BLOUER DIP P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEC, C(DEB. F>
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD, CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SANPLE NETER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPH
CO SAMPLE HETER/RANOE/PPH
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPN
C02 SANPLE HETER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SANPLE METER/RANCE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPN
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS CRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KK
C02 CRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TINE SECONDS
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFCi UET (DRY)
SCFt UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 011FTP
BAROMETER MM HG 737.4
HUMIDITY G/KG 5.7
TEMPERATURE DEG C 21.1
VEHICLE NO. 01
DATE 1/30/G1
BAG CART NO. 1
DTNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
TEST WEIGHT 1580. KG! 3500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 0.0 KU( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EH-344-F
ODOMETER 39222. KM(55440. MILES)
DRY BULB TEMP. 21.1 DEG C(70.0 DEG
ABS. HUMIDITY 5.9 SM/KG
1
COLD TRANSIENT
749.3 (27.5)
734.6 (29.0)
41.7 (107.0)
40526.
74.2 ( 2671.)
29. 3/ 3/ 293.
1.2/.3/ 12.
62. O/ 2/3170.
.2/ 2/ 8.
71. 11 3/ 1.30
3.S/ 3/ .05
50. 6/ 2/ 51.
.4/ 2/ 0.
0.17
282.
3065.
1.26
50.2
12.41
271.77
1752.2
6.32
2.12
46.39
270.9
1.08
16.16
504.
5.86
.912 (
1.000 (
STABILIZED
762.0 (30.0)
747.3 (29.5)
37.4 (103.0)
49574.
131.2 ( 4632.)
10. I/ 3/ 101.
1.3/ 3/ 13.
37.3/tl/ 436.
3.1/11/ 7.
49. 5/ 3/ .86
3. 0/ 3/ .06
22. 7/ 2/ 23.
.7/ 2/ 1.
14.73
89.
415.
.60
22.0
6.72
63.35
1928.9
4.77
1.07
10.09
307.3
.76
13.94
867.
6.20
.901)
.779)
207.4
0.00
12.14
15.01
CARBON
FUEL CI
HYDROCl
CARDON
OXIDES
F> NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .86
HOT TRANSIENT
747.3 (29.5)
736.6 (27.0)
41.7 (107.0)
40S55.
76.3 ( 2673.)
88. 4/ 2/ 33.
11.3/ 2/ 11.
97.5/12/ 247.
2.2/12/ 4.
67. B/ 3/ 1.22
2. O/ 3/ .04
53. 1/ 2/ 53.
.B/ 2/ 1.
10.70
76.
235.
1.18
20.83
1643.4
6.57
.59
3.56
281.7
1.13
12.34
SOS.
5.85
.924 (
1.000 (
DIOXIDE G/KN
JNSUMPTION L/100KM
tRDONS (TIIC) G/KM
MONOXIDE G/KM
OF NITROGEN G/KM
4
STABILIZED
759. S (29.9)
744.2 (29.3)
40.0 (104.0)
69566.
131.1 ( 4628.)
56. O/ 2/ 56.
11. 3/ 2/ 11.
72. a/12/ 147.
1.7/12/ 3.
47. 2/ 3/ .85
2.7/ 3/ .04
26. 7/ 2/ 27.
.C/ 2/ 1.
15.34
45.
160.
.81
26.0
3.43
24.36
1944.2
5.61
.54
3. 85
307.0
.87
13.44
368.
6.33
.913)
.979)
207.3
0.00
12.18
12.91
3-BAG (4-BAG)
290.5 ( 273.5)
13.96 ( 13.01)
1.16 ( 1.00)
15.83 ( 13.79)
.73 ( .96)
TEST NO. 011FET RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 BUICK REGAL
ENGINE 5.0 I(305, CID) V-0
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 737.14 HM 110(27.10 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 37. PCT
DAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOUER BIF P MM. HJOdN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEO. CIDEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKCRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANOE/PPN
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC. UET (DRY)
SCFp UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER>
BAROMETER>
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE.
CARBON DIOXIDE.
FUEL CONSUMPTION.
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/KM
L/100KM
HYDROCARBONSF G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE. G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN. G/KM
FET VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5030-007
VEHICLE N0.01
DOTE 1/20/81
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY DULB TEMP. 21.1 DEG C(70.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 5.9 GM/KG
FET
757.5 (27.7)
744.2 (29.3)
41.1 (106.0)
61352.
113.3 ( 4071.)
54. 3/ 2/ 54.
10. 3/ 2/
94.0/13/
2.1/13/
96. 4/ 3/
TEST UEI8HT 1588. KG( 3500. LBS)
a'° "" 10-7 HP1
ODOMETER 37246. KHIS545S. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .86
10.
95.
2.
3.6/ 3/
80, 8/ 2/
.11 2/
7.33
45.
.06
81.
1.
80.2
3.02
11.96
3725.8
15.26
765.
.864 ( .853)
1.000 < .971)
115.3
0.00
16.54
011FET
739.1
5.7
21.1
223.3
7.47
.IB
.72
.72
D-2
-------
TABLE D-2.
FTP
TEST NO. 012 EMISSION RESULTS
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5930-007
TEST NO. 012FTP RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 BUICK REGAL
ENGINE 5.0 L(305. CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 749.05 MM HGI29.49 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 33. PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOUER DIP P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEC. CIDEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW 3TD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC 8CHGRD METER/RANGE/PPH
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO 9MGRD r»ETER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE NETER/RANGE/PPN
NOX BCHGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION FCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRANS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
C02 GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
OFC. UET (DRY)
SCF. UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 012FTP
BAROMETER MM HG 749.0
HUMIDITY G/KG 5.2
TEMPERATURE DEG C 21.1
VEHICLE NO,01
DATE 1/22/91
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 21.1 DE6 C(70.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 5.2 GM/KG
TEST UEIGHT 138B. KG( 3500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.0 KU( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EH-344
ODOMETER 87838. KMI545BO. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .85
COLD TRANSIENT
STABILIZED
HOT TRANSIENT
STABILIZED
759.5 (29.9)
741.7 (29.2)
42.2 (108.0)
40620.
77.3 ( 2731.)
25. 8/ 3/ 258.
1.4/ 3/ 14.
98. 5/ 3/2878.
,4/ 3/ 9.
72. 2/ 3/ 1.31
3.6/ 3/ .06
55. 2/ 2/ 55.
,4/ 2/ 1.
8.31
246.
2767.
1.26
54.7
10.96
249.10
1784.7
6.84
1.88
42.75
306.3
1,17
16.19
506.
5.83
.914
1.000
764.5 (30.1)
759.5 (29.9)
39.4 (103.0)
69585.
132.9 ( 4692.)
82. 6/ 2/ 33.
14. 8/ 2/ 15.
70. 5/1 1/ 298.
2.9/11/ 8.
49. 3/ 3/ .85
3.7/ 3/ .06
23. O/ 2/ 23.
,4/ 2/ 1.
15.04
49,
282.
.80
22.4
5.27
43.62
1947.9
4.83
.84
6.98
311.7
.77
13.89
867.
6.25
( .904)
( .980)
210.2
0.00
12.03
15.00
CARBON
HYDROS
CARBON
OXIDES
767.1 (30.2)
754.4 (29.7)
38.3 (101.0)
40547.
77.6 ( 2741.)
71. 8/ 2/ 72.
14. I/ 2/ 14.
82.0/12/ 195.
3.3/12/ 4.
47. I/ 3/ 1.21
3.7/ 3/ .06
52. 6/ 2/ 53,
,6/ 2/ 1.
10.88
59.
183.
1.15
•» £4
16.55
1639,9
6.54
.46
2.86
283.2
1.13
12.34
506.
5.79
.925 (
1.000 (
DIOXIDE G/KM
ONSUMPTION L/100KM
ARSONS (THC) G/KM
MONOXIDE 6/KM
OF NITROGEN G/KM
744.5 (30.1)
754.4 (29.7)
40.0 (104,0)
49521.
132.7 ( 4485.)
43. I/ 2/ 43.
12. 5/ 2/ 13.
47.9/12/ 101.
2.7/12/ 5.
49. 2/ 3/ .05
4.0/ 3/ .06
26. 7/ 2/ 27.
,6/ 2/ 1.
15.48
31.
93.
.79
26.1
2.40
14.42
1929.5
5.61
.38
2.31
309.1
.90
13,40
867.
6.24
.915)
.980)
210.3
0.00
12,03
12.89
3-BAG (4-BAG)
302.8 ( 302.0)
13.94 ( 13.80)
.95 ( .82)
13.27 ( 11.89)
.95 ( .99)
TEST NO. 012FET RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 BUICK REGAL
ENGINE S.O L(305. CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 749.05 MM Hfl(29.49 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 29. PCT
BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOUER DIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. HETRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRO METER/RAN6E/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO 8CKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRO HETER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPN
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFCi UET (DRY)
SCFi UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM 6LR (SCH)
(MEAr
KM
EASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER.
HUMIDITY.
TEMPERATURE.
CARBON DIOXIDE.
FUEL CONSUMPTION.
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/KM
L/100KN
HYDROCARBONS. G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN. G/KM
FET VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-007
VEHICLE NO.01
DATE 1/22/81
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
TEST UEIGHT 1588
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD
GASOLINE EN-344
ODOMETER 87842. KM(54595. MILES)
KG( 3500. LBS)
8.0 KU( 10.7 HP)
12.
81.
3.
DRY BULB TE)1P.
ABS. HUMIDITY
FET
772.2 (30.4)
754.9 (29.8)
42.2 (108.0)
61322.
116.5 ( 4113.)
55.I/ 2/ 55.
12.O/ 2/
81.3/13/
3.1/13/
93.8/ 3/ 1.76
4.2/ 3/ .06
75.4/ 2/ 75.
.8/27 1.
7.57
45.
75.
1.70
74.7
3.00
10.14
3629.9
14.03
765.
.868 ( .840)
1.000 ( .974)
116.5
0.00
16.42
012FET
749.0
5.1
22.8
221.1
9.50
.18
.62
.85
22.8 DEG CI73.0 DEG F)
5,1 GM/KG
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .84
D-3
-------
TABLF'FT. TEST NO. 021 EMISSIONS RESULTS
FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-007
TEST NO. 021FTP RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 71 MERCURY HAROUIS
ENGINE 5.7 L(351. CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 755.14 MH HBI29.73 IN HB)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 26. PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOUER DIF P HM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEC. CfDEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STB. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANCE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANOEyPCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPN
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
C02 GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFC, WET (DRY)
SCFr WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 021FTP
BAROMETER MM HG 755.1
HUMIDITY B/KG 3.7
TEMPERATURE DEC C 19.4
VEHICLE NO. 02
DATE 2/ 2/81
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP.
ABS. HUMIDITY
COLD TRANSIENT
774.7 (30.5)
767.1 (30.2)
42.2 (108.0)
77T!°2739.>
12. 7/ 3/ 127.
.8/ 3/ 8.
oa',5/ 3/ 1.65
3.2/ 3/ .05
97. 3/ 2/ 97.
,2/ 2/ 0.
7.70
120.
803.
1.60
97.1
5.37
2277 9
11.71
.92
12.44
390.7
2.01
17.64
S04.
5.83
.901
1.000
TEST WEIGHT 2041. KG( 4500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.9 KW( 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE EM-470-F
ODOMETER 0. KM( 0. MILES)
19.4 DEG C(47.0 DEG F)
3.7 GM/KG NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .81
STABILIZED
769,6 (30.3)
762.0 (30.0)
42.2 (108.0)
31. 3/ 2/ 32*.
7.6/ 2/ 8.
22.6/13/ 21.
60'.S/ 3/ 1.07
3. I/ 3/ .05
34.9/ 2/ 35.
.4/ 2/ 0.
12.43
25.
19.
1.03
34.5
1.88
3,01
2513.1
7.16
.30
.48
397.0
1.14
17.10
868.
6.30
( .894)
( .980)
210.9
0,00
12.13
17.36
CARB
FUEL
HYDR
HOT TRANSIENT
769.6 (30.3)
762.0 (30.0)
42.2 (108.0)
40560 .
77.7 ( 2744.)
S3.9/ 2/ 34.
S.5/ 2/ 9.
79'.4/ 3/ 1.46
3.4/ 3/ .05
74. 2/ 2/ 74.
,4/ 2/ 0,
9,05
46.
174.
1.41
73.8
2.08
15.77
2007.3
8.92
.35
2.69
342.6
1.52
14.85
506.
5.86
,909 (
1.000 (
IN DIOXIDE G/KM
CONSUMPTION L/100KM
]C ARSONS (THC) G/KM
9 SF^TR-OGEN M
STABILIZED
767.1 (30.2)
762.0 (30.0)
42.2 (108.0)
32. 6/ 2/ 32*.
8.4/ 2/ ^8.
59*. 9/ 3/ 1.06
3.2/ 3/ .05
36. 2/ 2/ 36.
tS/ 2/ 1*
12.56
24.
23.
1.02
35.7
3.58
2471.1
7.38
.29
.57
391.8
1.17
16.80
865.
6.31
.901)
.980)
210.6
0.00
12.17
15.86
3-BAG (4-BAG)
301.8 379.7)
16.59 16.50)
.44 .44)
3,56 3,58)
1.42 1.43)
TEST NO, 021FET RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 79 MERCURY HAROUIS
ENGINE 5.7 LI351. CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 753.40 MM H6(29.74 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 23, PCT
0 BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. HSO)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEG. CIDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPN
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANOE/PPM
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME
DFCr WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
SECONDS
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/KM
L/100KM
HYDROCARBONSi G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDEr G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
HFET VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-007
VEHICLE NO.02
DATE 2/ 2/81
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 22.2 DEG CI72.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 4.1 GM/KO
HFET
787.4 (31.0)
767.1 (30.2)
42.2 (108.0)
61345.
117.4 ( 4146.)
46.6/ 2/ 47.
8.2/ 2/ 8.
38.9/13/ 36.
.7/13/ 1.
4S.5/ 2/ 2.00
1.5/ 2/ .05
36.7/ 3/ 110.
.2/ 3/ 1.
6.68
40.
34.
1.95
109.6
2.68
4.64
4198.3
20.23
766.
.850 ( ,844)
1,000 ( ,974)
117.4
0.00
16.58
021FET
755.4
4.1
M*
10.85
.16
.28
1.22
TEST HEIGHT 2041. KG( 4500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.9 KW( 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE EM-470-F
ODOMETER 0. KM( 0. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .82
D-4
-------
TABLE D-4. TEST NO. 022 EMISSIONS RESULTS
FTP
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-007
TEST NO. 022FTP RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 79 MERCURY MARQUIS
ENGINE 5.7 L(351. CID) V-B
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 753.87 MM HG(29.48 IN NO)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 23. PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOUER DIF P MM. H201IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP, DEG. C
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEG. CIDEG. F)
BLOHER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANOE/PPM
CO BCKCRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRU METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPN
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFCi UET (DRY)
SCF, UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER.
BAROMETERr
HUMIDITY.
TEMPERATURE.
CARBON DIOXIDE.
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/KM
L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS. G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE. G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
FET VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-007
VEHICLE NO.02
DATE 2/ 3/81
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 22.8 DEG C(73.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 3.4 GM/KG
FET
792.5 (31,2)
769.6 (30.3)
42.2 (103.0)
612G3.
117.0 ( 4133.)
44.8/ 2/ 47.
11.2/ 2/ 11,
42.5/13/ 40.
2.4/13/ 2.
45.3/ 2/ 1.99
1.7/ 2/ .04
40.4/ 3/ 121.
.!/ 3/ 0.
6.71
37.
36.
1.94
120.9
2.52
4.92
4148.8
21.81
745,
.851 ( .846)
1.000 ( .975)
117.0
0.00
14.57
022FET
754.1
3.4
22.8
250.3
10,73
.15
.30
1.32
TEST UEIGHT 2041. KGl 4500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.9 KW< 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE EN-470-F
ODOMETER 0. KM( 0, MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .81
D-5
-------
TABLE D-5. TEST NO. 031 EMISSIONS RESULTS
FTP
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-007
TEST HO. 031FTP RUM 1
VEHICLE MODEL 79 MERCURY MARQUIS
ENGINE 5.7 L(351. CID) (1-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 737.87 MX HS<29.05 IN H6>
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 48. PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOUER DIP P m. H20IIN. H2D)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGR0 METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAHPtE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPM
NOX 3CKGRD METER/RANGE/PPH
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPN
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRANS/KK
C02 CRAMS/KM
NOX GRANS/KK
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
NEASURE0 DISTANCE KM
DFC. MET (DRY)
SCF, UET (DRY)
VOL (SCH)
SAH BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 031FTP
BAROMETER MM HG 737.9
HUMIDITY G/K6 7.7
TEMPERATURE DEG C 21.1
VEHICLE NO. 03
DATE 2/ 9/81
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
TEST WEIGHT 2041. KG( 4500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.9 K«( 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE EN-470-F
ODOMETER 78474. KM (4 8763. MILES)
DRY BULB TEMP. 21.1 DEG C(70.0 DEG
ABS. HUMIDITY 7.7 GM/KG
COLD TRANSIENT
762.0 (30,0)
754.4 (29.7)
42.8 (109.0)
40598.
75.8 ( 2678.)
12. O/ 3/ 123.
1.5/ 3/ 15.
27. 8/ 3/ 647.
.6/ 3/ 14.
92. 1/ 3/ 1.72
3.2/ 3/ .05
68. 7/ 2/ 69.
.5/ 2/ 1.
7.46
115.
604,
1.68
68.3
5.03
S3. 34
2332.4
9.02
.87
9.23
403.4
1.56
17.96
SOS.
5.78
.095 (
1.000 (
STABILIZED
762.0 (30.0)
754.4 (29.7)
42.2 (108.0)
69550.
130.0 ( 4592.)
43. I/ 2/ <3.
18. 4/ 2/ 19.
80.3/13/ 80,
12.9/lj/ 12.
45. 2/ 3/ 1.17
3.8/ 3/ .04
21. 4/ 2/ 21.
,5/ 2/ 1.
11.37
24.
66.
1.11
20.9
1.96
9.99
2651.8
4.75
.31
1.59
421.7
.75
18. 15
867.
6.29
.881)
.972)
205.9
0.00
12.07
18.06
CARBON
FUEL C(
HYDROC<
CARBON
OXIDES
F NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .91
HOT TRANSIENT
762.0 (30.0)
754.4 (29.7)
42.2 (108.0)
40564.
75. 8 ( 2679.)
64. 5/ 2/ 65.
U.9/ 2/ 15.
95.4/12/ 240.
2.5/S2/ S.
84. 11 3/ 1.57
4,3/ 3/ .07
43. 0/ 2/ 43.
,5/ 2/ 1.
8.39
51.
225.
1.51
42.6
2.25
19.84
2095.7
5.62
.38
3.40
358.7
.96
15.59
SOS.
5.84
.900 (
1,000 (
DIOXIDE G/KM
1NSUMPTION L/100KN
IRBONS (THC) G/KM
MONOXIDE G/KM
OF NITROGEN G/KM
STABILIZED
762.0 (30.0)
754.4 (29.7)
130.0 ( 4589.)
33. 0/ 2/ 33.
13.27 2/ 13.
74.3/12/ 172.
2.0/12/ 4.
65. 3/ 3/ 1.17
3.6/ 3/ .04
23.0/ 2/ 23.
•6/ 2/ 1.
11.27
21.
142.
1.12
22.5
1.57
24.49
2661.9
5.08
.25
3.89
422.3
.81
18.32
866.
6.30
.886)
.972)
205,8
0.00
12.15
17.01
3-BAG (4-BAGI
400.7 ( 400.9)
17.41 ( 17.46)
.45 ( .43)
3.66 ( 4.34)
.98 ( .99)
TEST NO. 031FET RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 79 MERCURY MAROUIS
ENGINE 5.7 L(351. CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 736.60 MM H8I29.00 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 50. PCT
0 BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER DIF P MN. H20UN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOMER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(OEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPN
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANOE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC. UET (DRY)
SCF. UET (DRY)
VOL (SCN)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER.
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION.
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/KN
L/100KH
HYDROCARBONS, G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN. G/KM
HFET VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-007
VEHICLE NO.03,
DATE 2/ 9/81
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 22.2 OEG C(72.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 8.6 GM/KG
HFET
774.7 (30.5)
744.5 (30.1)
42.8 (109.0)
61374.
114.2 ( 4034.)
47.9/ 2/ 48.
12.9/ 2/ 13.
73.0/12/ 168.
1.3/12/ 2.
46.6/ 2/ 2.06
1.6/ 2/ .06
40.0/ 3/ 120.
.!/ 3/ 0.
6.45
37.
157.
2.01
119.7
2.44
20.82
4200.2
24.43
745.
.845 ( ,831)
1.000 ( .965)
114.2
0.00
16.42
031FET
736.6
8.6
22.2
255.8
11.02
.15
1.27
1.49
TEST WEIGHT 2041. KG( 4500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.9 KU( 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE EM-470-F
ODOMETER 78499. KM(48777. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .93
D-6
-------
TABLE D-6. TEST NO. 032 EMISSIONS RESULTS
FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-007
TEST NO. 032FTP RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 79 MERCURY MARQUIS
ENGINE 5.7 L(351. CID) V-B
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 731.01 MM HG(28.78 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 52. PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOUER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOyER INLET TEMP. DEC. CIDEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. METRES(SCO
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE HETER/RANOE/PCT
CD2 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPH
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPN
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
C02 GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
OFC. UET (DRY)
SCF, UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 032FTP
BAROMETER MM HG 731.0
HUMIDITY G/KG 0.1
TEMPERATURE DEG C 20.6
VEHICLE NO. 03
DATE 2/10/81
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP.
ABS. HUMIDITY
1
COLD TRANSIENT
749.3 (29.5)
736.6 (29.0)
34.4 ( 94.0)
40500.
76.3 ( 2695.)
11. 1/ 3/ 111.
1.7/ 3/ 17.
25. 8/ 3/ 599.
,4/ 3/ 9.
92. 4/ 3/ 1.73
3.7/ 3/ ,06
73. O/ 2/ 73.
l.O/ 2/ 1.
7.46
96.
561.
1.68
72.1
4.24
49.84
2346.4
9,49
.72
8.51
400.7
1 ,65
17,77
505.
5.86
.896
1.000
20.6 DEG CI69.0 DEG
B.I GM/KG
2
STABILIZED
762.0 (30.0)
741.7 (29.2)
41.7 (107.0)
69477.
128.9 ( 4551.)
36. 3/ 2/ 36,
17. 8/ 2/ 18.
67.7/13/ 66.
5.1/13/ 5.
63. 7/ 3/ 1.14
3.5/ 3/ .05
24. 6/ 2/ 25.
l.l/ 2/ 1.
11.63
20.
59,
1.09
23.6
1.49
8.85
2566.7
5.35
.24
1.41
410.3
.86
17.64
866.
6.26
( .831)
( .971)
205.2
0.00
12.11
17.70
CARBON
FUEL C(
HrDROCl
CARBON
OX I DCS
TEST UEIGHT 2041. KG( 4500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 3.9 KU( 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE EM-470-F
ODOMETCft 73534. KMI48799. MILES)
F)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .92
3 4
HOT TRANSIENT STABILIZED
749.4 (30.3) 762.0 (30.0)
744.2 (29.3) 749.3 (29.5)
41.7 (107.0) 42.2 (108.0)
40494. 67549,
75.1 ( 2651.) 128. B ( 4547.)
64. 7/ 2/ 65. 29. 9/ 2/ 30.
15. 5/ 2/ 16. 14, 4/ 2/ 14.
72.1/11/ 303. 74.8/12/ 179.
l.l/ll/ 3. 2.1/12/ 4.
34. O/ 3/ 1.55 64. 7/ 3/ 1.16
3.6/ 3/ .06 4.2/ 3/ .06
48. 3/ 2/ 48. 24. 3/ 2/ 24.
1.2/ 11 1. 1.5/ 2/ 2.
3.43 11.38
51. 17.
291. 169.
1.50 1.10
47.2 22.9
2.21 1.24
25.44 25.30
2067.5 2588.9
6.24 5.20
.38 .20
4.38 4.05
356.1 414.3
1.08 .83
15.55 17.90
505. 868.
5.81 6.25
.901 ( .886)
1.000 ( .971)
203.8
0.00
12.05
16.81
3-BAG (4-BAG)
DIOXIDE G/KM 393.4 ( 394.6)
MSUHPTION L/100KM 17.09 ( 17.19)
»RBONS (THC) G/K« .38 ( .37)
MONOXIDE G/KM 3.70 ( 4.48)
OF NITROGEN G/KN 1.08 ( 1.08)
TEST NO. 032FET RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 79 MERCURY MAORUIS
ENGINE 5.7 L(351. CID) V-B
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 756.92 MM HS<29,80 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 41. PCT
0 BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOUER DIF P UN. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEG. CIDEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD NETER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFCi
SCFr
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
C, UET (DRY)
Fr UET (DRY)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/KM
L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS, G/KH
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
FET VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-007
VEHICLE NO. 03
DATE 2/10/81
BAG CART NO. 1
BYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 DEG C(75.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 7.5 GM/KG
FET
769.6 (30,3)
762.0 (30.0)
42,2 (108.0)
61383,
117.9 ( 4163.)
54. t/ 2/ 55.
13. 3/ 2/ 14.
97.2/12/ 246.
1.8/12/ 3.
46. O/ 2/ 2.02
1.5/ 2/ .05
44. 3/ 3/ 133.
.5/ 3/ 2.
6.53
43.
230.
1.98
131.6
2.92
31.62
4272.6
26.87
766.
.847 ( .836)
1.000 < .968)
117.9
0.00
16.56
032FET
756.9
257,9
11.16
.18
1.91
1.62
TEST WEIGHT 2041. K0( 4500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.9 KU( 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE EM-470-F
ODOMETER 73559. KNUB814. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .91
D-7
-------
TABLE D-7. TEST NO. 036 EMISSIONS RESULTS
FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5630-007
TEST NO. 036FTP RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 77 MERCURY MARQUIS
ENGINE S.7 L(351. CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 760.22 MM HG(29,93 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 13. PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOUER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
DLOUCR INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. fl
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER7RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRO METER7RANGE7PPM
CO SAMPLE ,1ETER7RANGE7PPM
CO BCKGRD METER7RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANCE7PCT
C02 BCKGRD (1ETER/RANGE7PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NDX 8CKGRD METER7RANGE7PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS CRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS CRAMS
HC GRAMS7KH
CO GRAMS/KM
C02 GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS7KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L7100KM
RUN TIME . SECONDS
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFC. WET (DRY)
SCF, UET (0RY>
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
FUEL CONSUMPTION L7100KM
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 036FTP
DAROMETCR MM HG 740.2
HUMIDITY B/KG 1.9
TEMPERATURE DEC C 20.0
VEHICLE NO.03
DATE 2711781
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 20.0 DEG C(48.0 DEB
ASS. HUMIDITY 1.9 GM7HG
F)
TEST HEIGHT 2041. KG( 4500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.? MJ< 12.0 HP>
GASOLINE EM-470-F
ODOMETER 78597. KMI4B833. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .78
COLD TRANSIENT
749.6 (30.3)
742.0 (30.0)
42.2 (108.0)
40700.
78.4 ( 2774.)
10.77 37 107.
1.07 37 10.
63.6/11/ 256.
1.7/11/ 5.
87. 7/ 3/ 1.63
4.07 37 .06
70.47 27 90.
87 'V 1 .
8.05
78.
243.
1 58
89.7
4.45
22.22
2267.1
10.45
.77
3.83
370.4
1.80
17.02
507.
5.81
.903
1.000
STABILIZED
777.2 (30.6)
767.1 (30.2)
44.4 (112.0)
67414.
133.3 ( 4708.)
33. 6/ 27 34.
10. 6/ 27 11.
47.9/13/ 45.
5.2/13/ 5.
60.47 37 1.07
4.77 37 .07
24.47 27 25.
12742
24.
1.00
23.8
1.83
4.15
2452.2
4.70
.27
.98
372.3
.75
14.85
066.
4.25
( .879)
( .584)
211.9
0.00
12.04
14.93
CARBON
FUEL C(
HOT TRANSIENT
774.7 (30.5)
747.1 (30.2)
78.3 ( 2745.)
62.27 27 42.
10.47 27 10.
44.7/127 144.
1.4/12/ 3.
80. 7/ 3/ 1.48
4.5/ 3/ .07
54. 0/ 2/ 55.
,7/ 2/ 1.
8.91
53 •
1.42
54.2
2.39
12.48
2040,0
4.29
.42
2.17
354.0
1.09
15.31
505.
5.74
.907 <
1.000 (
DIOXIDE G/KM
DNSUMPTION L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS (THC) G/KH
CARBON MONOXIDE G/KH
OXIDES OF NITROGEN G/KM .
4
STABILIZED
774.7 (30.5)
769.6 (30.3)
40.6 (105.0)
69489.
134.4 < 4745.J
23. 9/ 27 27.
75I7/137 75'.
3.37137 3.
41.47 37 1.09
4.57 37 .07
26.77 27 27.
.77 2/ 1.
12.17
10
1 7 f
70 »
1.03
26.1
1.51
10.95
2527.7
5.19
.24
1.77
407.9
.34
17.54
868.
6.20
.903)
.984)
212.7
0.00
11.76.
16.48
3-BAG (4-8AG)
381.4 ( 386.0)
14.46 ( 16.67)
.42 ( .41)
1.70 ( 2.13)
1.06 I 1.07)
TEST NO. 036FET RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 77 MERCURY MAORUIS
ENGINE 5.7 L(351, CIO) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 760.73 MM HG(27.76 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY t, PCT
0 BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOIJER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEHP. DEfl. C(DEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPN
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANCE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPH
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC. UET (DRY)
SCF. UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM DLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMDER.
BAROMETER.
HUMIDITY.
TEMPERATURE.
CARBON DIOXIDE.
FUEL CONSUMPTION.
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/KM
L/100KH
HYDROCARBONS. G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE. G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN. G/KM
HFET VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-007
VEHICLE NO.03
DATE 2/11/81
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
•CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEHP. 22.2 DEG C(72.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 1.5 GM/KG
HFET
800.1 (31.5)
772.5 (31.2)
43.7 (111.0)
61313.
117.6 ( 4153.)
34.07 27 36.
9.27 27 9.
47.7/13/ 47.
2.1/13/ 2.
45.O/ 27 1.97
1.77 27 .06
46.I/ 3/ 138.
.2/ 3/ 1.
6.77
23.
44.
1.72
137.E
1.71
5.96
4134.7
23.77
745.
,852 ( .650)
1.000 ( .979)
117.6
0.00
16.39
036FET
761.0
1.5
22.2
252.3
10.81
.12
.36
1.45
TEST UEIGHT 2041, KG( 4500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.9 KU( 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE EH-470-F
ODOMETER 78620. KM(48852. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .77
D-8
-------
TABLE D-8. TEST NO. 037 EMISSIONS RESULTS
FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5030-007
TEST NO. 037FTP RUN 1
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 756.47 MM HG(29.77 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 16. PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOUER DIF P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX SCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO CRAMS/KM
C02 GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFC, UET (DRY)
SCF. UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 037FTP
BAROMETER MM HG 756.7
HUMIDITY G/KG 2.5
TEMPERATURE DEG C 21.1
VEHICLE NO. 03
DATE 2/12/B1
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 21
ABS. HUMIDITY 2.
1
COLD TRANSIENT
777.8 (30.7)
769.4 (30.3)
41.1 (106.0)
40580.
78.0 ( 2754.)
11. 3/ 3/ 113.
l.l/ 3/ 11.
94.8/11/ 435.
2.1/11/ 6.
87. 8/ 3/ 1.63
3.8/ 3/ .06
89. 4/ 2t 89.
.7/ 2/ 1.
7.73
103.
462.
1.58
88.8
4.65
41.92
2257.8
10.42
.80
7.21
380.4
1.79
17.17
505.
5.81
.903 (
1.000 (
.1 DEG C(70.0 DEG
5 GM/KG
2
STABILIZED
787.4 (31.0)
772.2 (30.4)
41.1 (106.0)
67534.
133.6 ( 4716.)
32. 5/ 2/ 33.
12, I/ 2/ 12.
67. 8/13/ 68.
6.6/13/ 6.
60. 2/ 3/ 1.07
3.7/ 3/ .06
25. I/ 2/ 25.
.7/ 2/ 1.
12.44
21.
61.
1.01
24.3
1.65
7.44
2474.3
4.88
.24
1.52
377.1
.78
17.0?
847.
6.23
.878)
.783)
211.5
0.00
12.04
17.13
CARBON
FUEL C(
HYDROC*
CARBON
OXIDES
TEST UEIGHT 2041. KG( 4500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.7 KU( 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE EM-470-F
ODOMETER 70662. KIK43870. MILES!
F)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .77
3 4
HOT TRANSIENT STABILIZED
787,4 (31.0) 787.4 (31.0)
777.2 (30.4) 774.7 (30.5)
40.6 (105.0) 40.6 (105.0)
40513. 69512.
77.9 ( 2749.) 133.6 ( 4718.)
42. 2/ 2/ 62. 28. 1/ 2/ 23.
11. 6/ 2/ 12. 10. 5/ 2/ 11.
69.5/12/ 153. 58.7/12/ 123.
2.2/12/ 4. 2.2/12/ 4.
00. O/ 3/ 1.47 41. 3/ 3/ 1.09
4. I/ 3/ .06 4.3/ 3/ ,07
53. 7/ 2/ 54. 25. 3/ 2/ 25.
8t 99 ' ' 12.14
52. 18.
149. 121.
1.41 1.03
53.2 24.5^
13.50 13.32
2015.5 2515.2
6.23 4.92
.40 .23
2.33 3.01
347.6 402.8
1.07 .79
15.05 17.43
503. 868.
5.80 6.24
.707 ( .902)
1.000 ( .983)
211.5
0.00
12.04
16.28
3-BAG (4-BAS)
DIOXIDE G/KM 331.7 ( 383.4)
JNSUMPTION L/100KM 16.54 ( 16.64)
IRBONS (THC) G/KM .41 ( .40)
MONOXIDE G/KM 2.92 ( 3.34)
OF NITROGEN G/KM 1.07 ( 1.07)
TEST NO. 037FET RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 77 MERCURY MARQUIS
ENGINE 5.7 L(351. CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 755.70 MM HG(27.76 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 13. PCT
0 BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOUER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P KM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANSE/PPM
HC BCKCRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKCRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS CRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC. UET (DRY)
SCF. UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER.
BAROMETER.
HUMIDITY.
TEMPERATURE.
CARBON DIOXIDE.
FUEL CONSUMPTION.
MM KG
G/KG
DEG C
G/KM
L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS. G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE. G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN. G/KM
HFET VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-007
VEHICLE NO.03
DATE 2/12/31
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.7 DEG C175.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 2,4 CM/KG
HFET
737.4 (31.0)
774.7 (30.5)
41.1 (106.0)
41322.
117.6 ( 4153.)
34.2/ 2/ 34.
11.O/ 2/ 11.
57.7/13/ 57.
3.0/13/ 3.
44.4/ 2/ 1.94
2.I/ 2/ .07
44.O/ 3/ 132.
,2/ 3/ 1.
6.88
25.
53.
1.08
131.5
1.68
7.21
4040.6
23.20
766.
.855 ( .051)
1.000 ( .778)
117.6
0.00
16.42
037FET
755.9
2.4
23.9
246.1
10.55
.10
.44
1.41
TEST UEIGHT 2041. KG( 4500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.7 KU( 12.0 HP)
GASOLINE EM-470-F
ODOMETER 78684. KM(48893. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .78
D-9
-------
TABLE D-9.
FTP
TEST NO. Oil EMISSIONS RESULTS
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-007
TEST NO. 041FTP RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 70 FORD GRANADA
ENGINE 4.9 L<302. CID) V-B
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 743.46 MM H8(29.27 IN KG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 31. PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOUER DIP P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOyER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. BEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD, CD. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGC/PPM
C02 SAMPLE NETER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX ECHGRD HETER/RANGE/PPN
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPN
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS CRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS CRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO CRAMS/KM
C02 GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFCt DRY
DFC, UET (DRY)
SCF. UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 041FTP
DAROMETER MM HG 743,S
HUMIDITY G/KG 7.4
TEMPERATURE DEG C 27.8
VEHICLE NO.04
,TCART2N02?T/ CVS NO.
DYNO NO. 3
TEST WEIGHT 1814. KG( 4000. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 9.8 KU< 13.2 HP)
9r705.YM<54983. MILES)
DRY BULB TEMP. 27.8 DEO CI82.0 DEO
ADS. HUMIDITY 7.4 GM/KG
1
COLD TRANSIENT
762.0 (30.0)
762.0 (30.0)
42.8 (109.0)
40594.
76.4 ( 2698.)
20. 7/ 3/ 209.
1.2/ 3/ 12.
43. 6/ 3/1047.
96. I/ 3/ 1.81
2.B/ 3/ .04
39. 6/ 2/ 40.
,6/ 2/ 1.
6.73
197.
1000.
1.77
39.1
8*75
80.96
2475,3
5.15
1.50
15.25
424.4
.B8
19.34
505.
5.83
.973
.807 (
1.000 (
2
STABILIZED
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.5)
42.8 (109.0)
67526.
130.6 ( 4611.)
67.6/ 2/ 68.
12. 1/ 2/ 12.
70.7/12/ 161.
.6/12/ 1.
6S.3/ 3/ 1.24
2.4/ 3/ .04
11. 4/ 2/ 11.
,7/ 2/ 1.
10.62
57.
155.
' 1.21
10.6
4.27
2.38
.68
3.74
458.0
.38
19.89
867.
6.30
.977
.879)
.977)
207.0
0.00
12.13
19.62
CARBON
FUEL C(
F> NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .90
3
HOT TRANSIENT
762.0 (30.0)
742.0 (30.0)
43.1 (109.5)
40490.
76.2 ( 2609.)
21. V 3/ 212.
l.l/ 3/ 11.
9S.2/11/ 488.
.2/11/ 1.
86. 3/ 3/ 1.60
3.3/ 3/ .05
37. 2/ 2/ 37.
.3/ 2/ 0.
0.03
202.
468.
1.56
36.9
8.89
41.50
2170.4
4.85
1.52
7,10
371.3
.03
16.53
505.
5.84
.975 .
.896 (
1,000 (
DIOXIDE 0/KM
1NSUMPTION L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS (THC) G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE G/Ktt
OXIDES
OF NITROGEN G/KN
4
STABILIZED
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.5)
42.8 (109.0)
69531.
130.6 ( 4612.)
64, 4/ 2/ 64.
11. 3/ 2/ 11.
62.0/12/ 137.
47. 4/ 3/ 1.21
3. 1/ 3/ .05
10. 7/ 2/ 11.
,4/ 2/ 0.
10.38
54.
132.
10.5
4.08
20.05
2793.4
2.37
.44
3.14
437.3
.37
18.94
868.
4.37
.979
.887)
.777)
204.8
0.00
12.23
17.80
3-BAG (4-BAB)
427,3 ( 421.3)
10.05 < 13.53)
1.08 ( 1.07)
7.04 I 4..05)
.61 ( .60)
TEST NO. 041FTP RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 FORD GRANADA
ENGINE 4,9 L(302. CID) V-B
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 743.46 MM HG(29.27 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 42. PCT
0 BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOUER DIF P MM. H20IIN, H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEG. CtDEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANOE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANCE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RAN6E/PCT
C02 DCKORD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPN
NOX UCKGRD METER/RANOE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC. UET (DRY)
SCF, UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER.
BAROMETER.
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE.
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION.
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/KM
L/IOOKM
HYDROCARBONS. C/KM
CARCON MONOXIDE. Q/KH
OXIDES Of NITROGEN. G/KM
HFET VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-007
VEHICLE NO.04
DATE 2/24/31
BAD CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULD TEMP, 24.4 DEC CI76.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 8.2 GM/KG
HFET
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.5)
42.0 (107,0)
61352.
115.2 < 4067.)
13.2/ 3/ 132.
l.l/ 3/ 11,
64.3/11/ 260.
.l/ll/ 0.
50.4/ 2/ 2.26
l.l/ 2/ .04
55.O/ 2/ 55.
l.l/ 2/ 1.
5.03
123.
245.
2.23
54.1
8.17
32.92
4702.4
10.99
766.
.828 < .817)
1.000 ( .966)
115.2
0.00
16.53
041FTP
743.5
8.2
24.4
284.5
12.34
.49
1.99
TEST UEIGHT 1814. KG( 4000. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 9.8 KU( 13.2 HP)
GASOLINE EM-470-F
ODOMETER 91728. KN<547»7. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .92
D-10
-------
TABLE D-10. TEST NO. 012 EMISSIONS RESULTS
TEST NO. 042FTP RUN 2
VEHICLE MODEL 78 FORD GRANADA
ENGINE 4.9 L(302. CID) V-0
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 741.43 MM HG<29.19 IN H6)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 58. PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEC. CIDEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD NETER/RANGE/PPN
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PPN
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD NETER/RANGE/PPH
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
C02 GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BT CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
DFCr DRY
DFC. yET (DRY)
SCr, UET (DRY)
VOL (SCH)
SAM DLR (SCH)
KM (MEASURED)
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KN
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMDER 042FTP
BAROMETER MM HO 741.4
HUMIDITY G/KG 10.7
TEMPERATURE DEG C 23.3
FTP VOIICLC EMISSIONS RCW r
PROJECT 11-5630-0(17
VEHICLE NO.04
DATE 2/25/31
BAG CART NO. 1 / CVS NO. 2
DYNO NO. 3
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.3 DEG C(74.0 DEG F)
ADS. HUMIDITY 10.7 CM/KG
TEST UEIGHT 1614. KG( 4000. LBS)
ACTUAL MAD LOAD 9.0 KU( 13.2 HP)
GASOLINE EH-470-F
ODOHCTEK 71759. KM<570t4. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1,00
1
MLD TRANSIENT
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.5)
43.3 (110.0)
40577.
76.0 ( 2402.)
22. 0/ 3/ 220.
1.2/ 3/ 12.
43. 5/ 3/1047.
.!/ 3/ 2.
95. O/ 3/ 1.80
3.2/ 3/ .05
34. O/ 2/ 37.
,6/ 2/ 1.
6.98
210.
909.
1.76
34.3
9.19
37.43
2444.9
5.27
1.56
14.01
414.2
.39
18.86
505.
5.90
.945
.800
1.000
•»
STABILIZED
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.5)
42. B (109.0)
49600.
130.3 ( 4403.)
74. O/ 2/ 75.
12. C/ 2/ 13.
79.9/12/ 109.
.6/12/ 1.
40. O/ 3/ 1.24
2.C/ 3/ .04
?.?/ 2/ 10.
.5/ 21 1.
10.59
63.
130.
1.20
9.4
4.75
27.27
2044.1
2.35
.74
4.23
444.1
.36
19.34
347.
6.45
.970
( .071)
( .968)
206.3
0.00
12.36
19.12
CARBON
TUEL C!
HYOROCf
CARDON
OXIDES
3
HOT TRANSIENT
742.0 (30.0)
742.0 (30.0)
43.3 (110.0)
40537.
74.0 ( 2483.)
19. 5/ 3/ 195.
1.4/ 3/ 14.
90.5/11/ 444.
.7/1 1/ 2.
06. 11 3/ 1.41
3.0/ 3/ .05
37. 5/ 2/ 38.
.a/ 2/ i.
3.00
1E3.
422.
1.57
36.3
8.01
37.32
2188.4
5.35
1.37
6.40
375.0
.92
14.42
505.
5.04
.944
.895 <
1.000 (
DIOXIDE G/KM
3N5UW-TION L/100KM
Vtf.OHS (Ti;C) G/KM
MONOXIDE GAM
Of NITROGEN CAM
4
STABILIZED
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.5)
42.8 (109.0)
69534.
130.2 ( 4598.)
49. 1/ 21 69.
14, 4/ 2/ 15.
51.4/12/ 109.
1.0/12/ 2.
48. O/ 3/ 1.22
3.0/ 3/ .05
12. 11 21 13.
.O/ 2/ 1.
10.30
54.
103.
1.18
12.0
4.19
15.43
2817,0
2.98
.46
2.47
444.6
.47
19.23
347.
6.34
.970
.879)
.949)
204.2
0.00
12.17
17.98
3-BAG (4-BAG)
419.2 ( 419.2)
13.51 ( 10.47)
1.08 ( 1.04)
6.99 ( 4.47)
.62 I .64)
TEST NO. 042FET RUN 2
VEHICLE MODEL 70 FORD GRANADA
ENGINE 4.9 LI302. CID) V-B
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 741.43 MH HB(2?.20 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 44. PCT
0 DAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOUER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP, BEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE NETER/RANGE/PPN
CO BCKORD METER/RANGE/PPN
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 DCKGRD METER/RANCE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPN
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS ORAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRANS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC. WET (DRY)
SCF, UET (DRY)
VOL (5CM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER.
BAROMETER.
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE.
CARBON DIOXIDE.
FUEL CONSUMPTION.
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/KM
L/100KH
HFET VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5030-007
VEHICLE NO.04
DATE 2/25/01
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 20.9 DEG CO4.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.2 GM/KG
HFET
787.4 (31.0)
787.4 <31.0)
43.3 U10.0)
41297.
114.5 ( 4043.)
14.0/ 3/ 160.
1.5/ 3/ 15.
83.7/11/ 390.
.8/11/ 2.
50.4/ 21 2.27
1.4/ 2/ .05
52.4/ 21 52.
.3/ 21 0.
5.74
143.
366.
2.23
52.2
9.75
' 48.75
4677.2
11.62
765.
.827 ( .015)
1.000 ( .765)
114.5
0.00
16.54
042FET
741.7
11.2
28.9
202.8
12.35
TEST UEIGHT
ACT
CTUAL'ROAD LOAD
GASOLINE EM-470-F
ODOMETER 91731. KMI57030. MILES)
KG( 4000.
9.8 '"
KU(
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.02
HYDROCARBONS. G/KN
CARBON MONOXIDE. G/KN
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
D-ll
-------
TABLE D-ll. TEST NO. (W6 EMISSIONS RESULTS
TEST NO. 046FTP RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 FORD GRANADA
ENGINE 4.9 L(302. CID) V-B
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 742.19 MM H6(29.22 IN HO)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 56. PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER Dir P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20(IN. 1120)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEC. C(DEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. HETRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO ECKGRB METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD MCTER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO HAGS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
C02 GRAMS/KM
NOX CRABS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
BFC. DRY
DFCt WET (DRY)
SCF, UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM DLS (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KH
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TC5T NUMBER 046FTP
BAROMETER MM HG 742.2
HUMIDITY G/KG 11.4
TEMPERATURE DEG C 25.0
FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5030-007
VEHICLE NO.04
BSWW/ CVS HO. 2
DYNO NO. 3
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.0 DEG C(77.0 DEC F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.4 GM/KG
TEST WEIGHT 1814. K6C 4000. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 7.B KU( 13.2 IIP)
GASOLINE EM-470-F
ODOMETER 91307. KM(57046. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.02
;OLD TRANSIENT
762.0 (30.0)
742.0 (30.0)
41.1 (106.0)
40534.
76.4 ( 2697.)
27. O/ 3/ 293.
1.5/ 3/ 15.
54. 9/ 3/1361.
.2/ 3/ 5.
95. 5/ 3/ 1.79
3.4/ 3/ .05
34. I/ 2/ 34.
l.O/ 2/ 1.
6.36
285.
1284.
1.75
35.2
12.56
114.33
2445.9
5.27
2.16
19.70
421.4
.71
19.60
505."
5.00
.965
.889
1,000
STABILIZED
774.7 (20.5)
774.7 (30.5)
42.2 (108.0)
69634.
130.7 ( 4615.)
30. O/ 2/ 80.
14. 5/ 2/ 15.
67.0/13/ 45.
6.6/13/ 6.
66. 6/ 3/ 1.20
3.8/ 3/ .06
10. 6/ 2/ 11.
,9/ 2/ 1.
11.08
67.
57.
1.14
9.8
5.03
0.66
2733.0
2.50
.81
1.40
441.1
.40
19.03
867.
6.20
.971
( .873)
( .967)
207.1
0.00
12.00
19,31
CARDON
FUEL Cl
HOT TRANSIENT
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.5)
43.3 (110.0)
40554.
76.0 ( 2682.)
13. 4/ 3/ 134,
1.4/ 3/ 14.
84.3/12/ 203.
2.7/12/ 5.
05. I/ 3/ 1.58
3.6/ 3/ .06
39. 4/ 2/ 39.
,9/ 2/ 1.
3.33
122.
188.
1.53
30.6
5.33
16.67
2123.9
5.74
.92
2.03
367.7
.99
16.01
505.
5.70
.967
.901 (
1.000 (
DIOXIDE G/KM
INEUMPTION L/100KX
HYDROCARBONS (THC) G/KM
CARCON MONOXIDE G/KM
OXIDES
OF NITROGEN G/KM
STABILIZED
774.7 (30.5)
774.7 (30.5)
43.3 (110.0)
69523.
130.2 ( 4598.)
71 .3/ 2/ 71.
14. 4/ 2/ 14.
50.2/13/ 54.
4.8/13/ 4.
44. O/ 3/ 1.16
3.7/ 3/ .06
12. O/ 2/ 13.
,7/ 2/ 1.
11.44
58.
49.
1,11
12.2
4.37
7.50
2639.7
3.10
.70
1.20
422.9
.50
18.22
867.
6.34
.971
.884)
.970)
206.2
0.00
12.02
17.16
3-BAG (4- BAG)
416.R ( 411.5)
1G.32 ( 1G.08)
1.12 ( 1.0?)
5.61 ( 5.55)
.67 ( .70)
TEST NO. 046FET RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 FORD GRANADA
ENGINE 4,9 L(302. CID) V-0
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 742.19 MM HG(29.22 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 54. PCT
0 SAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER DIF P MM, II20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP, DEO. CIDEO. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. METRK(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANOE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX DCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPH
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION fCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MAES GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DrC. UET (DRY)
SCF, UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCH)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARDON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM CG
G/KG
DEG C
G/KM
L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS, 0/KN
CARBON MONOXIDE. 0/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
FET VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-007
VEHICLE NO.04
DATE 2/26/31
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 26.7 DEG CfOO.O DEG F)
ABS, HUMIDITY 12.2 GM/KG
FET
737.4 (31.0)
787.4 (31.0)
43.6 (110.5)
61315.
114.6 ( 4046.)
17.3/ 3/ 173.
1.6/ 3/ 16.
94.1/12/ 235.
1.7/12/ 3.
50,5/ 2/ 2.27
1.3/ 2/ .06
54,9/ 2/ 55.
.?/ J/ 1.
5.81
160.
210.
2.21
54.3
10,55
29.11
4643,5
12.51
765.
.828 ( ,013)
1.000 ( .962)
114.6
0.00
16.31
046FET
742.2
12.2
2L.7
204.8
12,36
.65
1,79
.77
TEST WEIGHT 1814. KS( 4000. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 9.3 KU( 13.2 HP)
GASOLINE EH-470-F
ODOMETER 91829. KM(57060. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.05
D-12
-------
TABLE D-12. TEST NO. 051 EMISSIONS RESULTS
FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5330-007
TEST NO. 051FTP RUN t
VEHICLE MODEL 78 VOLVO 245DL ML
ENGINE 2.1 LI130. C1D) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 741.48 MM HG<29.20 IN HO)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 48. PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
INSCRIPTION
BLOUER DIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. M20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEC. C(DEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPIt
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPH
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKERD MFTER/RANfiE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS CRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRANS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
C02 ORAHS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
SCF, DRY
DFC. UET (DRY)
SCF. MET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER OStFTP
BAROMETER MM HG 741.7
HUMIOITY G/KG 9.1
TEMPERATURE BES C 23.9
VEHICLE NO.05
DATE 3/ 2/01
BAG CART NO. 1 / CVS NO. 2
DYNO NO. 3
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 DEC C(75.0 DEC F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 9.1 GM/HG
TEST UEIGHT 1588. KG( 3500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 9.5 KU( 12.8 HP)
GASOLINE EH-470-F
ODOMETCR 9494. KM( 5899. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .95
1
IOLD TRANSIENT
749.3 (29.5)
749.3 (29.5)
42.8 (109.0)
40408.
76.0 ( 2683.)
9. A/ 3/ 96.
1.4/ 3/ 14.
90.4/11/ 445.
1.5/11/ 4.
70. 7/ 3/ 1.28
4. I/ 3/ .06
35. 4/ 2/ 35.
.4/ 2/ 0.
10.07
83.
423.
1.22
35.0
3.65
37.45
1699.7
4.83
.63
6.44
292.5
.83
13.00
503.
5.81
.973
.920 (
1.000 (
2
STABILIZED
762.0 (30.0)
762.0 (30.0)
42.2 (108.0)
69757.
131.1 ( 4628.)
39. I/ 2/ 39.
13. O/ 2/ 13.
65.2/12/ 146.
1.1/12/ 2.
51. 9/ 3/ .90
4.2/ 3/ .06
6.S/ 2/ 7.
.3/ 2/ 0.
14.54
27.
139.
.84
6.2
2.04
21.21
2024.7
1.48
.32
3.37
321.6
.24
14.00
869,
6.30
.976
.906)
.975)
207.1
0.00
12.11
13.52
CARBON
FUEL Cl
HYDROS
CARBON
OXIDES
3
HOT TRANSIENT
749.3 (29.5)
749.3 (29.5)
43.3 (110.0)
40481.
76.0 < 2685.)
49. 0/ 2/ 49.
11. 6/ 2/ 12.
74.7/12/ 173.
.6/12/ 1.
66. O/ 3/ 1.18
3.3/ 3/ .05
30. 6/ 2/ 31.
.9/ 2/ 1.
11.12
38.
165.
1.14
29.8
1.69
14.64
1583.2
4.11
.29
2.50
270.7
.70
11.76
504,
5.85
.774
.925 (
1.000 (
DIOXIDE G/KM
1NSUNPTION L/tOOKN
ARSONS (THC) G/KM
MONOXIDE G/KM
OF NITROGEN G/KM
4
STABILIZED
762.0 (30.0)
762.0 (30.0)
42.8 (109.0)
69586.
130.6 ( 4612.)
42. 6/ 2/ 43.
11. 5/ 2/ 12.
76.3/12/ 17B.
.4/12/ 1.
50. O/ 3/ .87
3. I/ 3/ .05
8.2/ 2/ 8.
,9/ 2/ 1.
15.08
32.
171.
.82
7.4
2.40
26.05
1967.5
1.74
.39
4.19
316.1
.28
13.32
868.
6.23
.977
.911)
.975)
206.7
0.00
12.07
12.83
3-BAG (4-BAG)
301.6 ( 299.9)
13,18 ( 13.12)
.38 ( .40)
3.77 ( 4.00)
.49 ( .50)
TEST NO. 051FET RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 79 VOLVO 245DL CAL
ENGINE 2.1 LU30. CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 741.93 MM H8(29.21 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 49. PCT
0 BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOUER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P HH. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEG, CtDEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKORD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKORD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANCE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS DRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC. UET (DRY)
SCF, UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER.
BAROMETER, MM HG
HUMIDITY, G/KG
TEMPERATURE, DEG C
CARBON DIOXIDE, G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION. L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS. G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE. G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN. G/KM
HFET VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-007
VEHICLE NO.05
DATE 3/ 2/31
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.0 DEG CI77.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 10.0 GM/KG
HFET
756.9 (29.8)
756.9 (29.8)
43.3 (110.0)
61429.
115.3 ( 4072.)
73.4/ 2/ 73.
12.I/ 2/ 12.
95.8/12/ 241.
•4/12/ 1.
79.I/ 3/ 1.45
3.I/ 3/ .05
27.I/ 2/ 27,
1.2/ 2/ 1.
9.05
63.
230.
1.41
26.0
4.16
30.86
2974.3
5,60
766.
.889 ( .875)
1.000 ( .971)
115.3
0.00
16.39
051FET
741.9
10.0
25.0
181.5
7.91
.25
1.88
.34
TEST UEIGHT 1588, KG( 3500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 9.5 KU( 12.8 HP)
GASOLINE EM-470-F
ODOMETER 94969. KM(59011. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .98
D-13
-------
TABLE D-13. TEST NO. 052 EMISSIONS RESULTS'
FTP VEHICLE.EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-007
TEST NO, 052FTP RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 VOLVO 245DL CAL
ENGINE 2.1 L(130. CIO) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 735.58 MN H6(29.96 IN NG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 62. PCT
BAB RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOUER OIF P MM. H20(IH. H20>
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STB. CU. HETRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANCE/PPM
HC BCKBRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD NETER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
C02 GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
SCF, DRY
DFC. VET (DRY)
SCF, UET (DRY) ,
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
Kn (MEASURED)
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 052FTP
BAROMETER MM HG 735.6
HUMIDITY G/KO 11.5
TEMPERATURE DEG C 23.3
VEHICLE NO.05
DATE 3/ 3/31
BAG CART NO. 1 / CVS NO. 2
DYNO NO. 3
DRY BULB TEMP. 23,3 DEG C(74.0 DEG
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.5 GM/KG
TEST WEIGHT 1588. KG( 3500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 9.5 KU( 12.8 HP)
KfEl 958o1?°KH(S9032. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.03
1
OLD TRANSIENT
754.4 (29.7)
749.3 (29.5)
42.8 (109.0)
40502.
75.5 ( 2665.)
9.4/ 3/ 94.
1.7/ 3/ 17.
87.0/tl/ 416.
2.5/11/ 7.
71.5/ 3/ 1.29
3.6/ 3/ .06
35. 0/ 2/ 35.
. 8/ 2/ 1.
9.97
79'
1 25
34.3
3.42
34.37
1720.2
5.08
.59
5.95
297.7
.88
13.1?
504.
5.78
.768
.720 (
1.000 (
STABILIZED
759.5 (29.9)
746.8 (29.4)
42.8 (109.0)
129.7 ( 4580.)
46. 9/ 21 47.
17.4/ 21 17.
63.4/12/ 155.
3.2/12/ 4.
51. 4/ 3/ .90
J.3/ 3/ .05
7\\',l', I:
14.60
31.
.85
6.3
2.30
21.66
2020.8
1.60
.37
3.46
322.7
.25
14.06
867.
6.26
.972
.901)
.970)
205.2
12.04
13.64
CAREON
FUEL C(
HYDROS
CARBON
OXIDES
HOT TRANSIENT
759.5 (29.9)
749.3 (29.5)
42.2 (108.0)
40500.
75.5 ( 2666.)
49. 8/ 2/ 50.
17. 21 2/ 17.
64.6/12/ 144.
2.3/12/ 4.
45. 4/ 3/ 1.17
3.2/ 3/ .05
28. 5/ 2/ 29.
1.3/ 2/ 1.
11.26
34.
134.
1.13
27.3
1.49
11.78
1557.3
4.05
.26
2.05
270.2
.70
11.71
505.
5.76
.969
.926 (
1.000 (
DIOXIDE G/KM
1N5UMPTION L/100KM
RBONS (TIIC) G/KM
MONOXIDE G/Krt
OF NITROGEN G/KM
4
STABILIZED
754.4 (29,7)
744.2 (29.3)
42.2 (108.0)
67564.
129.9 ( 4583.)
43. 9/ 2/ 44.
17.5/ 21 IB.
41.7/12/ 136.
1.7/12/ 3.
49, 8/ 3/ .36
3.0/ 3/ .05
8.5/ 2/ 9.
1.2/ 2/ 1.
15.21
28,
128.
.82
7.4
2.06
19.38
1949.6
1.38
.33
3.11
312.6
.30
13.59
867.
6.24
.972
.907)
.971)
205.3
0.00
12.00
12.69
3-BAG (4-BAG)
303.2 300.2)
13.23 13.10)
.38 .37)
3.59 3.48)
.51 .52)
TEST NO. 052FET RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 VOLVO 245DL CAL
ENSINE 2.1 L(130. CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 734.57 MM HG(28.92 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 54. PCT
0 BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOUER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
£8 mm mnmm
C02 SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CO> G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE. G/KM
OXIBES OF NITROGEN. G/KM
78. 4/ 3/ 1.44
3.3/ 3/ .05
18. 4/ 2/ IB.
l.O/ 2/
9.19
54.
146,
1.39
17.5
3.59
17.40
2918.3
3.98
745.
.891 (
1.000 (
114.5
0.00
16.34
052FET
734.6
11.8
26.1
178.6
7.73
.22
1.17
.24
.876)
.969)
D-14
-------
TABLE D-14. TEST NO. 056 EMISSIONS RESULTS
FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-007
TEST NO. 056FTP RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 VOLVO 245DL CAL
ENGINE 2.1 LU30. C1D) L-4
TRANSMISSION H4
BAROMETER 731.77 MM Hfl(28.81 IN HO)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 44, PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P NM. H20UN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P HM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT ROW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANCE/PPM
CO BCKGRO METER/RAN6E/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PPN
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPh
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS CRAMS
C02 MASS DRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAKS/KH
C02 GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION By CB L/100KH
RUN TIME SECONDS
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
SCF, DRY
DFC. UET (DRY)
SCF. WET (DRY)
VOL (SC«>
SAM BLR (SEN)
KM (MEASURED)
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 056FTP
BAROMETER MM HG 731.8
HUMIDITY G/KG 9.7
TEMPERATURE DEG C 26.1
VEHICLE NO.OS
DATE 3/ 4/81
BAG CART NO. 1 / CVS NO. 2
DYNO NO. 3
DRY BULB TEMP. 26.1 DEG CI79.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 9.7 GM/KG
TEST UEIGHT 1588. KG( 3500. LBS1
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 9.5 KU( 12.8 HP)
GASOLINE EM-470-F
ODOMETER 9508. KM( 5908. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .97
COLD TRANSIENT
STABILIZED
HOT TRANSIENT
STABILIZED
749.3 (29.5)
747.3 (29.5)
42.8 (109.0)
40442.
74.9 ( 2644.)
97. 3/ 2/ 97.
14. 7/ 2/ 17.
32.8/tl/ 383.
,5/H/ 1.
47. 7/ 3/ 1.22
3.4/ 3/ .05
37. 6/ 2/ 38.
.9/ 2/ 1.
10.60
82.
368.
1.17
36.8
3.55
32.06
1605.6
5.10
.61
5.52
274.4
.88
12.24
503.
5.80
.975
.925 (
1.000 (
749.3 (29.5)
749.3 (29.5)
41.7 (107.0)
49718.
129.4 < 4570.)
47. 8/ 2/ 48.
15. 0/ 2/ 15.
73.2/12/ 149.
.4/12/ 1.
48. 4/ 3/ .84
3.2/ 3/ .05
7.7/ 2/ 8.
l.O/ 21 1.
15.56
34.
162.
.79
6.8
2.52
24.47
1882.4
1.62
.40
3.91
301.0
.26
13.16
868.
6.25
.978
.912)
.977)
204.4
0.00
12.06
12.73
CARBON
FUEL Cl
HYDROC*
CARBON
OXIDES
749.3 (29.5)
747.3 (29.5)
42.8 (109.0)
40514.
75.1 ( 2451.)
S3.4/ 2/ 54,
12. 9/ 21 13.
59.4/12/ 130.
.1/12/ 0.
62. 7/ 3/ 1.12
3. 1/ 3/ .05
31. 2/ 2/ 31.
.9/ 21 1.
11.77
42.
1 «08
30.4
1.81
10.94
1480.7
4.22
.31
1.89
255.8
.73
11.09
505.
5.79
.975
.930 (
1.000 (
DIOXIDE G/KM
JNSUHPTION L/100KM
1RDONS (THC) G/KM
MONOXIDE G/KM
OF NITROGEN G/KM
749.3 (29.5)
749.3 (29.5)
42.8 (109.0)
49407.
129.0 ( 4554.)
43. 6/ 21 44.
11. 7/ 2/ 12.
64.5/12/ 144.
.2/12/ 9.
47. 21 31 .81
3. 1/ 3/ .05
7.4/ 21 7.
• 11 21 1.
16.11
33.
•J'J
6.7
2.43
20.88
1815.5
1.61
.39
3.35
291.3
.26
12.71
868.
6.23
.978
.916)
.977)
204.0
0.00
12.02
11.93
3-BAG (4-BAG)
283.4 ( 280.7)
12.41 ( 12.27)
.42 ( .42)
3.69 ( 3.52)
.52 ( .52)
TEST NO. 058FET RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 VOLVO 245DL CAL
ENGINE 2.1 L(130. CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 740.92 MM HG(27.17 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 45. PCT
0 BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOUER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DES. CIDEG.
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPN
NOX BCKGRD METER/RAN6E/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CH MASS GRANS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, UET (DRY)
SCF, UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER, MM HG
HUMIDITY, G/KG
TEMPERATURE, DEG C
CARBON DIOXIDE» G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION, L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS, G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, S/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
HFET VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-007
VEHICLE NO.05
DATE 3/ 5/81
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
23.
DRY BULB TEMP.
ABS. HUMIDITY
HFET
756.7 (27.8)
756.9 (29.B)
43.3 (110.0)
61390.
115.1 ( 4043.)
63.6/ 2/ 64.
B.O/ 2/ 8.
58.7/12/ 129.
•2/12/ 0.
80.4/ 3/ 1.48
3.5/ 3/ .05
23.I/ 3/
.7/ 2/
8.95
56.
123.
1.43
22.5
3.75
16.45
3013.2
4.64
744.
.888 ( .875)
1.000 ( .972)
115.1
0.00
16.47
058FET
740.9
0.9
24.4
182.9
7.90
.23
1.00
.28
24.4 DEG CI74.0 DEG F)
8.9 GM/KG
TEST UEIGHT 1588. KG( 3500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 9.5 KU( 12.8 HP)
GASOLINE EM-470-F
ODOMETER 95178. KM(59141. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .94
D-15
-------
TABLE D-15. TEST NO. 057 EMISSIONS RESULTS
FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5B30-007
TEST NO. 057FTP RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 VOLVO 245DL CAL
ENGINE 2.1 L(130. CIB) L-4
TRANSMISSION H4
BAROMETER 740.92 MM HG(29.17 IN HG>
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 30. PCT
BAG RESULTS
fas NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOUER DIF P MN. H20IIN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P UN. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(BEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOy STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPN
HC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD HETcR/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPN
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS CRAMS
C02 HASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC BRAMS/KM
CO C-RAMS/Kft
C02 GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION 31 CB L/100KH
RUN TIME SECONDS
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
SCFr DRY
DFC. UET (DRY)
5CF, UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 057FTP
BAROMETER NH HG 740.9
HUMIDITY G/KG 4,0
TEMPERATURE DEG C 25.0
VEHICLE NO.05
DATE 3/ 5/81
BAG CART NO. 1 / CVS NO. 2
DYNO NO. 3
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.0 DEB CI77.0 BEG
ABS. HUMIDITY 4.0 GM/KG
F)
TEST UEIGHT 1588. KG( 3500. L8S)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 9.5 KU( 12.8 HP)
GASOLINE EH-470-F
ODOMETER 95138. KMS9114. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .87
MLD TRANSIENT
749.3 (29.5)
749.3 (29.5)
42.8 (109.0)
40547.
74.2 ( 2491.)
84. 9/ 2/ 87.
8.3/ 2/ 8.
84.9/11/ 414.
1.9/11/ 4.
43. 4/ 3/ 1.24
3.2/ 3/ .05
45. 7/ 2/ 44.
,4/ 2/ 0.
10.43
79.
397.
1.19
45.3
3.49
35.20
1442.2
5.73
.40
4.10
288.1
.99
12.79
505.
5.77
.979
.925
1.000
STABILIZED
754.9 (29.8)
754.9 (29.8)
41.1 (104.0)
49428.
131.0 ( 4427.)
31. 3/ 2/ 31.
8.5/ 2/ 9.
49.4/12/ 104.
.9/12/ 2.
48. I/ 3/ .83
3.2/ 3/ .05
7.8/ 2/ 8.
.4/ 2/ 0.
15.88
23.
100.
.78
7.4
1.74
15.28
1882.5
1.41
.28
2.45
302.1
.24
13.10
847.
4.23
.983
( .914)
( .931)
207.2
0.00
12.00
12.95
CARBON
FUEL Ct
HYDROC*
CARBON
OXIDES
HOT TRANSIENT
749.3 (29.5)
749.3 (27.5)
42.8 (109,0)
4051S.
74.1 ( 2487.)
39. B/ 2J 39.
B.O/ 2/ 8.
52.0/12/ 111.
.1/12/ 0.
43. 7/ 3/ 1.14
3.2/ 3/ .05
38. 3/ 2/ 38.
.5/ 2/ 1.
11.44
31.
107.
1.09
37.8
1.38
9.50
1521.5
4.77
.24
1.43
241.7
.82
11.31
505.
j.Bl
.980
.929 (
1.000 (
DIOXIDE G/KM
INSUMPTION L/100KN
IRBONS (THC) G/KN
MONOXIDE 0/KM
OF NITROGEN G/KM
4
STABILIZED
754.9 (29.8)
754.9 (29.0)
41.7 (107.0)
49700.
131.0 ( 4427.)
28 .3/ 2/ 28.
7.8/ 2/ 8.
47.2/12/ 99.
.2/12/ 0.
48. O/ 3/ .83
3.4/ 3/ .04
8.7/ 2/ 9.
,7/ 2/ 1.
15.93
21.
94.
.78
8.0
1.59
14.47
1844.1
1.75
.25
2.35
298.5
.28
12.93
848.
4.24
.983
.920)
.982)
207.1
0.00
12.04
12.15
3-BAG (4-BAO)
288.1 ( 237.1)
12.54 ( 12.49)
.34 ( .33)
2.98 ( 2.95)
.57 ( .57)
TEST NO. 057FET RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 VOLVO 245DL CAL
ENGINE 2.1 LU30. CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 741.17 MM H6(29.18 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 34. PCT
0 BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOUER DIF P MN. H20UN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MN. H20UN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEO. C(DEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC. WET (DRY)
SCF, UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCN)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER.
BAROMETER.
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/KH
L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS, G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KH
HFET VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-007
VEHICLE NO.05
DATE 3/ 5/81
BAG CART NO, 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.0 DEG C(77.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 7.3 GM/KG
HFET
754.7 (29.8)
754.9 (29.8)
43.3 (110.0)
41429.
115.2 ( 4047.)
45.8/ 2/ 44.
8.0/ 2/ 8.
73.8/12/ 170.
•3/12/ 1.
77.4/ 3/ 1.42
3.I/ 3/ .05
27.2/ 2/ 27.
.4/ 2/ 1.
9.29
59.
143.
1.38
24.7
3.90
21.88
2903.2
5,28
744.
.892 ( .882)
1.000 ( .975)
115.2
0.00
14.35
057FET
741.2
7.3
25.0
177.7
7.71
.24
1.34
.32
TEST UEIGHT 1588. KG( 3500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 9.5 KU( 12.8 HP)
GASOLINE EH-470-F
ODOMETER 95142, KM(59131. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .90
D-16
-------
TABLE D-16. TEST NO. 061 EMISSIONS RESULTS
FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RCSULTS
PROJECT 11-5030-007
TEST NO. 061FTP RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 0 OLBS. CUTLASS
ENGINE 3.8 LI231. CID) V-4
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 752.0? MM HG<29.41 IN MO)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 32. PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLO'JER INLET P MM. N20UN. H20)
BLOUtR INLET TEMP. DEC. C(DEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANCE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
TO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS ORAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
C02 GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
SCF, DRY
DFC, UET (DRY)
SCFr UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 041FTP
BAROMETER MM HG 752.1
HUMIDITY G/KG 6.1
TEMPERATURE DEG C 24.4
VEHICLE NO.06
DATE 3/ 9/31
BAG CART NO. 1 / CVS NO, 2
DYNO NO. 3
DRY BULB TEMP. 24.4 DEG C(76.0 DCG F)
AB5. HUMIDITY 6.1 GM/KG
TEST UEIGHT 15E8. KG( 3500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.0 KU( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE CM-470-F
ODOMETER 76078. KM(47285, MILC3)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .37
1
:OLD TRANSIENT
762.0 (30.0)
762.0 (30.0)
42.2 (108.0)
40505.
77.4 ( 2734.)
17. A/ 3/ 176.
l.l/ 3/ 11.
46. O/ 3/1719,
,3/ 3/ 7,
67. i/ 3/ 1.22
3. I/ 3/ .05
42. 9/ 3/ 127.
.!/ 3/ 0.
9.58
166.
1655.
1.17
128.4
7,42
147.24
1662.9
14.52
1.28
25.79
287.4
2.86
14.17
505.
5.79
,978
.924
1.000
2
STABILIZED
767.1 (30.2)
767.1 (30.2)
40.6 (105.0)
6V644.
133.2 ( 4703.)
36. 6/ 2/ 37.
9.9/ 11 10.
88.5/12/ 214.
1.0/12/ 2.
44. 8/ 3/ .77
3.2/ 3/ .05
44. 4/ 2/ 44,
.5/ 2/ 1.
16.91
27.
209,
.72
43,9
2.10
32.43
1759.8
9.72
.34
5.21
282.8
1.56
12.47
863.
6.22
.783
( .915)
( .981)
210.6
0.00
12.01
13.29
3
HOT TRANSIENT
762.0 (30.0)
762.0 (30.0)
42.2 (108.0)
40516.
77.3 I 2729.1
66. 7/ 2/ 47.
9.9/ 2/ 10,
73.7/11/ 319.
.3/11/ 1.
60. 9/ 3/ 1,08
3. 1/ 3/ .05
37. 2/ 3/ 112.
.!/ 3/ 0.
11.98
58.
308.
1.04
111.3
2.57
27.71
1468.1
14.30
.45
4.82
255.1
2.48
11.27
505.
5.75
.780
.933 (
1.000 (
4
STABILIZED
767.1 (30.2)
767.1 (30.2)
41.7 (107.0)
49587.
132.8 ( 4689.)
25. O/ 2/ 25.
9,5/ 2/ 10,
40.3/12/ 134.
.5/12/ 1.
44. 2/ 3/ .74
3.8/ 3/ .04
43. 2/ 2/ 43.
.61 11 1.
17.36
14.
130.
.70
42.4
1.23
20.02
1705.4
7.41
.20
3.23
275.5
1.52
12.00
043.
4.19
.983
.923)
.982)
210,1
0.00
11.94
11.45
3-DAG (4-BAG)
CARBON D
FUEL CON
HYPROCAR
CARBON «
OXIDES 0
IOXIDE G/KM
SUMPTION L/100KM
BONS (TIIC) G/KM
ONOXIDC G/KM
F NITROGEN G/KM
374.2 < 27
12.49 ( 12
.54 (
9. .17 ( 0
2.08 ( 2
4.0)
.33)
.52)
.78)
.07)
TEST NO. 061FET RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 0 OLDS.CUTL ASS
ENGINE 3.8 L(231. CID) V-4
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 752.35 MM HG(29.42 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 37. PCT
0 BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
DLOUER DIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP, DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STH. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 DCKORD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGC/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANCE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, UF.T (DRY)
SCF. UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER.
BAROMETER.
HUMIDITY.
TEMPERATURE.
CARBON DIOXIDE.
FUEL CONSUMPTION.
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
0/KM
L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS. G/KM
CARHON MONOXIDE. G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
HFET VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5030-007
VEHICLE NO.04
DATE 3/ 7/31
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 25,4 DEG C(78.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 7.5 GM/KG
HFET
747.1 (30.2)
747.1 (30.2)
43.3 (110.0)
41350.
114.3 ( 4123.)
36.1/ 21 34.
0.3/ 2/ 8.
49.4/12/ 104.
.3/12/ 1.
84.5/ 3/ 1.40
3.2/ 3/ .05
77.3/ 3/ 232.
,2/ 3/ 1.
8.20
27.
99.
1.54
231,4
1.74
13.52
3337.2
44.78
745.
.879 ( .869)
1.000 ( .973)
116.8
0.00
16.24
061FET
752.3
7.5
25.4
205.4
8.85
.12
.83
2.38
TEST UEIGHT 1588. KG( 3500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.0 KU( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-470-F
ODOMETER 76122. KM(47300. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .91
D-17
-------
RESULTS
TEST NO. 062FTP RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 0 OLDS. CUTLASS
ENGINE 3.B L(231. CID) V-4
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 751.33-MM H8(29.58 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 37. PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOUER D1F P MM. H2D(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. BEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/SANGE/PPN
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS CRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
C02 GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
SCF, DRY
DFC, UET (DRY)
SCF, MET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM SLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 042FTP
BAROMETER MM HG 751.3
HUMIDITY G/KG 4.4
TEMPERATURE DEG C 23.3
PROJECT 11-5030-007
VEHICLE NO,04
DATE 3/10/81
BAG CART NO. 1 / CVS NO. 2
DYNO NO. 3
DRY BULB TEMP.
DBS. HUMIDITY
23.3 BEG C(74.0 DEB F)
4.4 GM/KG
TEST UEIGHT 1508. KG( 3500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 3.0 KU< 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-470-F
ODOMETER 74151. KM(47313. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .88
.'OLD TRANSIENT
742.0 (30.0)
742.0 (30.0)
42.8 (109.0)
40557.
77.2 ( 2727.)
20. 3/ 11 203.
l.O/ 3/ 10.
71. 2/ 3/1841.
.3/ 3/ 7.
47. 5/ 3/ 1.21
3.0/ 3/ .05
44. 4/ 3/ 133.
.3/ 3/ 1.
9.48
194.
1709.
1.17
132.4
8.44
140.35
1457.5
17.23
1.49
27.47
205.1
2.94
14.23
505.
5.01
.977
.925
1.000
^
STABILIZED
747.1 (30.2)
747.1 (30.2)
40.0 (104.0)
49474.
133.2 ( 4705.)
30, 1/ 2/ 30.
B.9/ 2/ 9.
74.4/12/ 178.
1.9/12/ 4.
44. O/ 3/ .75
3.0/ 3/ .05
44. 4/ 2/ 44.
,4/ 2/ 1.
17.33
22.
170.
.71
45.8
1.47
24.38
1730.5
10.29
.27
4.21
276.4
1.44
12.12
048.
4.24
.931
( .914)
( .900)
210.5
0.00
12.07
13.13
CARBON
FUEL C(
IIYDROCf
CARBON
OXIDES
HOT TRANSIENT
742.0 (30.0)
762.0 (30.0)
42.2 (108.0)
4051S.
77.2 ( 2724.)
45. 3/ 2/ 45.
8.7/ 2/ 9.
72.3/12/ 229.
.7/12/ 1.
62. i/ 3/ 1.11
3.4/ 3/ .05
41. 3/ 3/ 125.
.2/ 3/ 1.
11.74
37.
220.
1.07
124.9
1.64
17.80
1508.6
16.24
.29
3.41
260.0
2.30
11.36
505.
5. SO
.978
.932 (
1.000 (
DIOXIDE G/KM
)NSUMPTION L/100KM
»RB0NS (THC) G/KM
MONOXIDE G/XM
OF NITROGEN G/KM
4
STABILIZED
747.1 (30.2)
747.1 (30.2)
41.1 (106.0)
49597.
132.8 ( 4490.)
19. 3/ 2/ 20.
B.6/ 2/ 9.
49.0/12/ 103.
•7/12/ 1.
44. 2/ 3/ .74
3.B/ 3/ .04
48. 7/ 2/ 49,
,7/ 2/ 1.
17.44
12.
100.
.70
48.0
.90
15.38
1705.7
10.75
.14
2.47
273.4
1.72
11.66
348.
4.23
.981
.921)
.980)
210.0
0.00
12,04
11.42
3-BAG (4-BAG)
273.7 ( 272.9)
12.35 ( 12.27)
.52 ( .49)
8.E5 ( 8.33)
2.23 ( 2.24)
TEST NO. 042FET RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 0 OLDS. CUTLASS
ENGINE 3.6 L(231. CID) V-4
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 751.33 MM HG(29.58 IN HO)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 33. PCT
0 BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOUER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TCTP. DEG. C(DEG, F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC DCKGRD NETER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 CAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TINE SECONDS
.DFC, UET (DRY)
SCF. UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY.
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/KM
L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS, G/KM
CAftBON MONOXIDE, D/KN
OXIDES OF NITROGEN. G/KM
HFET VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5330-007
VEHICLE NO.04
DATE 3/10/81
BAG CART NO. 1
CYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.0 DEG C(77.0 DEG F)
ADS, HUMIDITY 4.5 GM/KG
HFET
747.1 (30.2)
747.1 (30.2)
43.3 (110.0)
41341.
114.4 ( 4118.)
34.5/ 2/ 35,
8.2/ 2/ 8.
52.4/12/ 112.
.4/12/ 1.
88.4/ 3/ 1.65
3.4/ 3/ .04
83.0/ 3/ 249.
.3/ 3/ 1.
B.06
27.
107.
1.40
240,2
1,04
14.53
3417.4
48.64
745,
,874 ( .847)
1.000 ( .974)
114.4
0.00
14.40
042FET
751.3
6.5
25.0
208.4
B.97
.11
.89
2.97
TEST UEIGHT 1588. KS( 3500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.0 KU( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-470-F
ODOMETER 7417S. KHM7333. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .08
D-18
-------
TABLE D-18. TEST NO. 066 EMISSIONS RESULTS
TEST NO. 066FTP RUN 1
VEHICLE HODEL 0 OLDS. CUTLASS
ENGINE 3.0 LI231. CID) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 749.01 MM HGI29.52 IN KG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 42. PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOUER DIF P m. H20IIN. N20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEG. CIDEG. F)
BLOUEH REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOy STD. CU. M£TRES(ECF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC DCKGRD METER/RAN6E/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO DCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANCE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METErt/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAHPLE METER/RANGE/PPN
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS CRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO ORAMS/KM
C02 GRAMS/KM
NOX ORAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/IOOKM
RUN TIME SECONDS
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
SCF, I'RY
BFC, UET (DRY)
SCFi UET (DRY)
VOL (ECM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/IOOKM
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 064FTP
BAROMETER MM HG 749.8
HUMIDITY G/KG 8.1
TEMPERATURE OEG C 24.4
FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5630-007
VEHICLE NO.04
DATE 3/11/Oi
BAG CART NO. 1 / CVS NO. 1
DYNO NO.. 3
DRY BULB TEMP. 24.4 DEG C
-------
TABLE D-19. TEST NO. 068 EMISSIONS RESULTS
FTP VEHICLE EMOTIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11 5030-007
TEST NO. 04BFTP RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 OLDS. CUTLASS
ENGINE 3.0 LI231. CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 746.74 MM HGI29.40 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 34. PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOUER Dir P MM. H20IIN. 1120)
DLOUER IMLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEHP. DEC. CIOEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT TLOy 5TD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE HETER/SANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/FPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPN
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
C02 CRAMS/KM
NOX CRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CE L/100KH
RUN TIME SECONDS
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
5CF. DRY
DFCf UET (DRY)
3CF. UET (DRY)
VOL (SCN)
SAM BLR (SCH)
KM (MEASURED)
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 060FTP
BAROMETER MM 11C 744.0
HUMIDITY G/KG 7.2
TEMPERATURE DEC C 25.0
VEHICLE NO.06
DATE 3/13/01
BAG CART NO. 1 / CVS NO. 2
DYNO NO. 3
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.0 BEG CI77.0 BEG
ADS. HUMIDITY 7.2 CM/KG
TEST WEIGHT 15BO. KG( 3500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 0.0 KU( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-470-F
ODOhETF.R 74323. KM<47425. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .70
lOLB TRANSIENT
747.3 (27.5)
744.2 (27.3)
43.9 (111.0)
40577.
74.0 ( 2711.)
23. 7/ 3/ 237.
.8/ 3/ 0.
49. 4/ 3/1002.
,2/ 3/ 5.
71. 4/ 3/ 1.30
2.7/ 3/ .04
46. 4/ 2/ 47.
.21 2/ 0.
0.97
230.
1732.
1.24
44.4
10.10
154.34
1771.2
6.11
1.75
24.64
304.7
1.05
15.03
505.
5.01
.776
,9?2
1.000
STADILIZED
762.0 (30.0)
756.7 (27.0)
37. C (100.0)
69000.
131. B ( 4452.)
17. S/ 21 20.
8.0/ 11 8.
55.7/12/ 120.
.5/12/ 1.
44. 4/ 3/ .76
2.9/ 3/ .04
12. O/ 2/ 12.
. .4/ 2/ 0.
17.32
12.
114.
.72
11.6
.91
17.33
1732.7
2.43
.14
2.32
274.0
.42
11.91
067.
6.32
.701
( .712)
( .730)
200.5
0.00
12.14
13.40
CARDON
FUEL C(
HYDRQC*
CARBON
OXIDES
3
HOT TRANSIENT
762.0 (30.0)
742.0 (30.0)
42.0 (107,0)
40536.
74.7 ( 2707.)
50. O/ 2/ 51.
8.4/ 2/ 0.
77.7/U/ 344.
.2/11/ 1.
44. 4/ 3/ 1.15
3.2/ 3/ .05
30. 5/ 2/ 39.
.5/ 2/ 1.
11.27
43.
334.
1.11
33.0
1.91
29.78
1552.4
5.00
.33
5.14
260.1
.36
11. 03
505.
5.79
.978
.727 (
1.000 (
DIOXIDE 0/K«
JNSUMPTION L/100KM
»RCONS (T!IC) G/KM
MONOXIDE G/KM
OF NITROGEN G/HN
STADILIZED
747.1 (30.2)
747.1 (30.2)
42.8 (109.0)
47«97.
131. S ( 4644.)
17. 2/ 2/ 17.
7.7/ 2/ S.
40.3/12/ 132.
.4/12/ 1.
45. 9/ 3/ .79
3.S/ 3/ .05
13. 7/ 2/ 14.
.*/ 2/ 0,
16.43
12.
123.
1*3
.91
17.42
1777.5
3.05
.14
3.13
203.5
.49
12.33
060.
4.27
.931
.917)
.700)
208.2
0.00
12.06
12.07
3- BAG (4--0AG)
270.7 ( 281.5)
12.5.1 ( 12.65)
.53 ( .53)
8.34 ( 0.45)
.47 ( .49)
TEST NO. 067FET RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 OLBS. CUTLASS
ENGINE 3.8 L(231. CID) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 744.74 «N 110(27.40 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 41. PCT
0 DAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOUER BIF P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. BEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STB. CU. METRES(SCF)
KC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKORD METER/RANCE/PPN
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPN
CO DCKGRD METER/RANCE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKORD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPN
HC MASS CRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS CRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
Ore. UET (DRY)
BCFF UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM DLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBERr
BAROMETER.
HUMIDITY.
TEMPERATURE.
CARBON DIOXIDE.
FUEL CONSUMPTION.
MM HG
G/KB
DEG C
G/KM
L/100KM
HFET VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5330-007
VEHICLE NO.04.
BATE 3/12/01
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY DULD TEMP.
AES. HUMIDITY
HFET
767.1 (30.2)
747.1 (30.2)
43.3 (110.0)
23.7 DEO C(75.0 DEG F)
7.7 GM/KB
TEST WEIGHT 15&8, KG( 3SOO. LES)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 0.0 KU( 10.7 IIP)
GASOLINE EM-470--F
ODOMETER 74274. KM(47400. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .91
HYBROCARBONS. G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE. G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN. G/KM
3l74/ 2/ 31.
7.9/ 2/ 0.
55.9/12/ 121.
.4/12/ I.
90.3/ 3/ 1.40
3.2/ 3/ .05
53. S/ 2/ 54.
,3/ It 0.
115.
1.44
53.2
1.64
15.47
3402.8
10.73
764.
.673 ( .862)
1.000 ( .971)
115.7
0.00
16.30
047FET
746.0
7.7
23.9
213.6
9.20
.10
.95
.44
D-20
-------
TABLE D-20. TEST NO. 071 EMISSIONS RESULTS
FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT li-5030-007
TEST NO. 071FTP RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 CHEV.HALIBU ML
ENGINE S.O L(305. CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 747.27 MM HGI29.42 IN HG>
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 32. PCT
BAS RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOUER OIF F MM. H20(IN. H20>
BLOUER INLET P MM. II2Q(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEB. CIDEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
IIC SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCHGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 ECKCRB hETER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METCR/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPN
HC MASS ERAMS
CO MASS CRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
C02 GRAHS/KM
NOX CRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CO L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
SCF, DRY
DrCi WET (DRY)
SCF, UET (DRY)
VOL
-------
TABLE D-21. TEST NO. 072 EMISSIONS RESULTS
TEST NO. 072TTP RUN 2
VEHICLE MODEL 70 CSIEV.MALIBU CAL
ENGINE 5.0 LI305. CJD) V-0
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 734.65 MM HGI29.01 IN HG>
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 27. PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20UN. K20)
BLO'JER INLET P M,1. H20
-------
TABLE D-22. TEST NO. 076 EMISSIONS RESULTS
TEST NO. 076FTP RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 70 CHEV.MALIBU CAL
ENGINE 5.0 1(205, CID) V-0
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 747,70 MM HGI29.44 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 14. PCT
DAO RESULT5
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
ELOUER DIF P MM. H20UN. 1120)
BLOUER INLCT P .1.1. II2Q
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DES. C(DEG. F)
ELOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPN
HC DCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKCRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 ECKGRD HETER/RANGE/FCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPN
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MAGS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFCt UET (DRY)
SCF, UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM DLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER.
BAROMETER.
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE.
CARBON DIOXIDE.
FUEL CONSUMPTION.
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/KM
L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS. G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE. G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
HFET VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11 5030-000
VEHICLE NO.07
BATE 3/19/81
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 24.7 DEO COO.O DEG F)
AB5. HUMIDITY 3.5 GM/KG
HFET
000.1 (31.5)
792.5 (31.2!
43.3 (110.0)
61259.
115.3 ( 4070.)
37.2/ 2/ 37.
13.6/ 2/ 14.
66.3/12/ 149.
.3/12/ 1.
45.6/ 2/ 2.00
1.6/ 3/ .02
30.1/ 2/ 30.
,V 2/ 0.
6.63
26.
142.
1.98
29.8
1.71
19.03
41D3.3
5.30
765.
.049 ( .045)
1.000 ( .976)
113.3
0.00
16.48
076FET
747.3
3,5
26.7
253.9
10.93
.10
1.15
.32
TEST UEIGHT 1588. KG( 3500. LDS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 0.0 KU{ 10.7 IIP)
6ASOLINE CM-470-F
ODOMETER 60621. KMI37660. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR ,01
D-23
-------
TABLED
RESULTS
TEST NO. 078FTP RUM 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 CHEV.MALIBU CAL
ENGINE 5.0 L(305. CID) V-B
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 742.70 HH HG(29.24 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 49. PCT
BAD RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOUER DIF P MM. H20IIH. H20)
BLOUER INLET t> HH. H20UN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEHP. DEG. C(DEG. D
BLOUCR REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPH
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CQ2 SAKPLE HETER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPN
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRANS
HC GRAMS/KN
CO GRAMS/KM
C02 GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KH
RUN TIME SECONDS
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
SCFi DRY
OFC, UET (DRY)
SCF, UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAH BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KH
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 07BFTP
BAROMETER MM HG 742.7
HUMIDITY G/KG 10.0
TEMPERATURE DEG c 25.0
PROJECT 11-5030 010
VEHICLE N8.07
DATE 4/ 7/01
BAG CART NO. 1 / CVS NO. 2
DYNO NO. 3
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.0 DEG CI77.0 DEG
ABS, HUMIDITY 10.0 GM/KG
F)
TEST HEIGHT 1588. KG( 3500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 3.0 KU( 10.7 HPI
GASOLINE EM-470-F
ODOMETER 41357. KM(39434. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTO.1! .98
COLD TRANSIENT
787.4 (31.0)
702.3 (30.3)
43.3 (110.0)
40523.
75.9 ( 2679.)
12. 6/ 3/ 126.
1.4/ 3/ 14.
55. 11 3/1334.
.!/ 3/ 2.
86. O/ 3/ 1.61
2.9/ 3/ .04
24. 11 2/ 27.
.4/ 2/ 1.
7,43
114,
1318.
1.57
24.4
4.98
114.37
213?73
.86
20.08
376.9
,64
17.55
505.
5.80
.969
.901 (
1.000 (
3TADILIZED
792.5 (31.2)
787.4 (31.0)
43.3 (110.0)
47548.
130.1 ( 4574.)
34. 4/ 2/ 34.
14. 1/ 2/ 14.
71.5/12/ 144.
1.5/12/ 3.
59. 9/ 3/ 1.04
3.3/ 3/ .05
11. 5/ 2/ 12.
.a/ 2/ i»
12.41
21.
155.
1.01
10.8
1.41
23.49
2416.5
2.41
.26
3.74
387.1
.42
16.81
847.
6.24
,774
.887)
.972)
206.0
0.00
12.04
17.17
CARBON
FUEL C(
HYDROCI
CARBON
OXIDES
HOT TRANSIENT
787.4 (31,0)
782.3 (30.8)
43,3 (110.0)
40473.
75. B ( 2677.)
64. 6/ 2/ 65.
14. O/ 2/ 14.
23. 8/ 3/ S50.
.!/ 3/ 2.
75. O/ 3/ 1.37
2. 8/ 3/ .04
16. 1/ 2/ 16.
.7/ 2/ 1.
9.40
52.
525.
1.33
15.5
2.28
46.35
1843.4
2.19
,37
7.97
316.3
.38
14.11
505.
5.02
.772
.912 (
1.000 (
DIOXIDE G/KM
1NSUMPTION L/IOOKM
1RBONS (THC) G/KM
MONOXIDE G/KM
OF NITROGEN G/KM
4
STABILIZED
792.5 (31.2)
707.4 (31.0)
43.3 (110.0)
69474.
130,0 ( 4589.)
33. 4/ 2/ 34.
IS.O/ 2/ 15.
74.2/12/ 171.
1.2/12/ 2.
57. 7/ 3/ 1.02
3.4/ 3/ ,05
11. I/ 2/ 11.
1.2/ 2/ 1.
12.92
20.
143.
.97
10.0
1.48
24.72
2306.3
2.42
.24
3.94
368.1
.39
16.01
867.
6.27
.975
.897)
.974)
205.8
0.00
12.08
15.09
3-BAB (4-BAG)
365.7 ( 360.1)
14.22 ( 15.77)
.42 ( .41)
8.30 ( 8.35)
.45 ( .44)
TEST NO. 078FET RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 CHEV.MALIBU CAL
ENGINE 5.0 L(305. CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 741.93 MM H6I29.21 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 43. PCT
0 BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOUER DIF P MM. H20IIN. 11201
BLOUER INLET P HH. H20UN. H20>
BLOUER INLET TEHP. DEO. C(DEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 DCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC. UET (DRY)
SCF, MET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER.
BAROMETER.
HUMIDITY.
TEMPERATURE.
CARBON DIOXIDE.
FUEL CONSUMPTION.
MM KG
G/KG
DEG C
G/KM
L/IOOKM
HYDROCARBONS. G/KM
CAREON MONOXIDE. G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN. G/KM
HFET VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5030-010
VEHICLE NO.07
BATE 4/ 7/31
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
BRY BULB TEHP. 27.2 DEG CI01.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 10.4 GM/KG
HFET
807.7 (31.8)
800.1 (31.5)
43.3 (110.0)
61287.
114.3 ( 4036.)
53.3/ 2/ 53.
14.5/ 2/ 15.
65.5/11/ 267.
.5/11/ 1.
45.8/ 2/ 2.01
1.5/ 2/ .05
30.7/ 2/ 31.
l.l/ 2/ 1.
6.55
41.
252.
1.97
30.0
2.70
33.53
4117.6
6.49
745.
.947 ( .035)
1.000 ( .747)
114.3
0.00
16.39
078FET
741.9
10.4
27.2
251.3
10.88
.16
2.05
.40
TEST HEIGHT 1588. KG( 3500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.0 KU< 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-470-F
ODOMETER 61831. KM(38451. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .99
D-24
-------
TABLE'D-24. TEST NO. 081 EMISSIONS RESULTS
TEST NO. 001FTP RUN 1
VEHICLE J10DEL 70 MONTE CARLO
ENGINE 3.0 L(231. CID) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 740.54 MM HG<29.47 IN HO)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 25. PCT
BAD RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
DLOUER INLET P MM. !I20(IN. M20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP, DEC. C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES (SCF)
HC SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPM
HE BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPN
CO DCKGRD METEP,/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE HETER/RANCE/PCT
C02 BCKCRB METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANCE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
IIC MAGS GRAMS
CO MACS CRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAWS/KW
CO GRAMS/KM
C02 GRAMS/KM
NOX CRAHCAU
FUEL CONSUMPTION BT CD L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
GCF, DRY
BFC. WET (DRY)
SCF, WET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/IOOKM
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER OC1FTP
BAROMETER MM 110 740.5
HUMIDITY G/KG 5.1
TEMPERATURE DEC C 25.4
FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11 5330-00.'
VEHICLE NO.00
DATE 3/23/lM
BAG CART NO, 1 / CVS NO, 2
[IYNO NO. 3
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.4 DEC C(70.0 DEC D
ABO. HUMIDITY 5.1 CM/KG
TEST WEICHT 1500. KC( 3500. LBS>
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 0.0 Ka< 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-470-F
ODOMETER ««««« KM<67467. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .04
1
:OLO TRANSIENT
702.3 (30.0)
774,7 (30.5)
43.3 (110,0)
40429.
74.0 ( 2712.)
9.4/ 3/ 94.
.O/ 3/ 0.
35. 2/ 3/ 031.
.21 3/ 5.
70. 1/ 3/ 1.28
3.3/ 3/ .05
38.V/ 3/ 117.
.!/ 3/ 0.
9,76
87.
000.
1.24
116.4
3.04
71.53
1739.6
14.43
.47
12.39
301.4
2.50
13.79
504.
5,77
.900
.923 (
1.000 (
2
STABILIZED
792.5 (31.2)
707.4 (31.0)
41.7 (107.0)
49529.
131.6 ( 4646.)
12. 9/ 2/ 13.
O.O/ 2/ 9.
0.9/13/ 8.
.5/137 0.
40. 6/ 3/ .04
3.0/ 3/ .06
46. 4/ 2/ 46.
.5/ ^/ 1,
15.91
5.
7.
.79
45.7
.35
1.14
1092.6
9,76
.06
.13
303.1
1.56
12.96
047.
4.24
,904
.915)
.903)
200.4
0.00
12.01
13.36
CARBON
FUEL Ct
HYDROW
CARBON
OXIDES
2
HOT TRANSIENT
707.4 (31.0)
777.2 (30.4)
43.3 (110.0)
40475.
76.5 ( 2700.)
55. 4/ 2/ 55.
8.3/ 2/ 0.
05.2/13/ 05.
.1/13/ 0.
63. 3/ 3/ 1.13
3.6/ 3/ .06
30. 2/ 3/ 115.
.!/ 3/ 0.
11.7]
48.
82,
1.08
114.3
2.11
7.34
1509.7
14,11
.37
1.27
262.2
2.45
11.32
505.
5.76
.902
.929 (
1.000 (
DIOXIDE G/KM
:,'ISUMPTIO,V L/100K.1
WBOMS (TI!C> G/KM
MONOXIDE C/fvM
OF NITROGEN GAM
4
STADILIZED
792.5 (31.2)
787.4 (31.0)
43.1 (109.5)
69544,
131,3 ( 4636.)
12. 4/ 2/ 12.
8. 1/ 2/ 0.
3.0/13/ 3.
.1/13/ 0.
40, O/ 3/ .03
3.77 3/ .06
44. 7/ 21 45.
,5/ 2/ 1.
16.14
5.
3.
,7C
44.2
.36
.39
1344.0
9.37
.06
.06
300.5
1.51
12.04
860.
6.20
.904
.922)
.983)
207.3
0.00
11,94
12.11
3--BAG (4 CAG>
291.6 ( 290.8)
11.60 ( 12.65)
.27 ( .271
3.00 ( 2.97)
2.00 ( 1.99)
TEST NO. 001FET RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 70 MONTE CARLO
ENGINE 3.0 L(231. CID) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 747.70 MM H0<29.44 IN HO)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 28. PCT
0 DAO RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOWER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEO. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE HETER/RANGE.TPM
HC BCKCRD METER/RANCE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO DCKCRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE flETER/RANGE/PCT
C02 DCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKCRD METER/RANCE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
GRAMS
CRAMS
GRAMS
CO MA:
C02 HA
NOX HAGS
RUN TIME
BfC. WET (DRY)
SCF, MET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM DLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER.
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE.
CARBON DIOXIDE.
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
SECONDS
m HG
G/KG
BEG C
G/KM
L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS. G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE. G/KH
OXIDES OF NITROGEN; G/KM
HFET VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11 5030-007
VEHICLE NO.00
DATE 3/23/G1
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO MO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.6 DEC C(73.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 5.7 GM/KG
HFET
800,1 (31.5)
787.4 (31.0)
43.9 (111.0)
61321.
115.4 ( 4076.)
23.3/ 2/ 23.
7.9/ 2/ 0.
16.0/13/ 15.
.2/13/ 0.
82.5/ 3/ 1.52
3,4/ 3/ .04
67.5/ 3/ 203.
.21 3/ I.
0.70
16.
15.
1.47
202.0
1.03
1.95
3112.4
30.29
745.
.006 ( .070)
1.000 ( .977)
115.4
0.00
14.20
001FET
747.0
5.7
25.4
191.2
8.1C
.07
.12
TEST WEIGHT 1500. KG( 3500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAB LOAD 8.0 KW( 10.7 IIP)
GASOLINE EM--470-F
OBCMETER ««»» KMI47402. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .06
D-25
-------
RESULTS
TEST NO. OB2TTP RUM 1
VOIICLE MODEL 70 MONTE CARLO
ENGINE 3.0 L(231. CID) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 741,60 Hit HG(27.20 IN US)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 40. PCT
BAB RESULTS
BAG NUMDO!
DESCRIPTION
BLOUER DIP F MM. H20CIN. 1120)
DLOUER INLET f> ,1)1. H20CIN. M20)
BLOUCR INLET TEMP. BES. C(BEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STB. CU. METREE(SCF)
MC SAMPLE METER/RANOE/PPM
HC BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPN
CO DCKGRB HETER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PCT
C02 ECKGRD NETER/RAHGE/PCT
NOX SA.fPLE METER/RAflGE/PPM
NOX ECKGRD METER/RANGE/PPW
BILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS CRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO CRAMS/KM
C02 GRANS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KN
RUN TIME
MEASUREB DISTANCE
SCF, DRY
BFC. UET (DRY)
SCF, UET (DRY)
SECONDS
KM
VOL (5CM)
SAM BLR (5CM)
KM (MEASUREB)
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 002FTP
BAROMETER MM MG 741.7
HUMIDITY G/KC 0.4
TEMPERATURE BEG C 25.6
PROJECT 11-5030-007
VEHICLE NO. 00
DATE 3/25/01
BAG CART NO. 1 / CVS NO. 2
BYNO MO. 3
DRY BULB TEMP.
ADS. HUNIBITY
COLD TRANSIENT
702.3 (30.0)
774.7 (30.5)
42.8 (107.0)
40566.
76.0 ( 2603.)
11. 2/ 3/ 112.
1.2/ 3/ 12.
35. ?/ 3/ 049.
.!/ 3/ 2.
71. fl/ 3/ 1.30
2.0/ 3/ .04
40. 6/ 3/ 122.
.3/ 3/ 1.
9.61
101.
015.
1.26
121.0
4.44
72.07
1756.3
16.32
.76
12.35
301.0
2.00
13.78
505.
5.84
.975
.921
1.000
25.6 DEG C(70.0 DEG
8.4 GM/XG
2
STABILIZED
707.4 (31.0)
777.2 (30.6)
42.2 (100.0)
69544.
130.3 ( 4602.)
16. 9/ 21 17.
11. I/ 2/ 11.
0.2/13/ 7.
.7/13/ 1.
49. 11 3/ ,07
3.2/ 3/ .05
46.0/ 21 47.
.7/ 21 1.
15.44
7.
7.
.02
46.1
.49
1.00
1955.0
10.60
.00
.16
310.6
1.70
13.23
867.
6.29
.979
( .907)
( .970)
206.3
0.00
12.13
13.52
CARDON
FUEL Cl
MYDROC!
CARBON
OXIDCG
TEST UEIGHT 1500. KG( 3500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 0.0 Kil( 10.7 HP)
»&£°KM(67527. MILES,
NOX HUMIBITY CORRECTION FACTOR .93
HOT TRANSIENT
782.3 (30.0)
774.7 (30.5)
43.3 (110.0)
40490.
75.0 ( 2676.)
50. 21 2/ 50.
11. fl/ 21 12.
57.6/12/ 125.
.1/12/ 0.
64. 6/ 3/ 1.15
3. 1/ 3/ .05
38. 21 3/ 115.
.!/ 3/ 0.
11.43
39,
121.
1.11
114.3
1.72
10.64
1542.2
15,33
.27
1.02
263.5
2.63
11.41
505.
5. 05
.976
.920 (
1.000 (
DIOXIDE G/KM
JNEUMPTION L/100KM
WBONS (THC) G/KM
MONOXIDE G/KM
OF NITROGEN 0/KM
4
STABILIZED
707.4 (31.0)
777.2 (30.6)
43.3 (110.0)
17. 2/ 21 17*.
12.2/ 21 12.
0.0/13/ 7.
.1/13/ 0.
48. 4/ 3/ .04
3.2/ 3/ .05
44. I/ 21 44.
.6/ 2/ 1.
15.78
6*
7.
.77
43.5
.43
1.05
1001.6
10.05
.07
.17
277.9
1.59
12.74
860.
6.32
.977
.916)
.978)
205.8
0.00
12.17
12.10
3- BAG 1 4- BAG)
295.7 ( 272.0)
12.07 ( 12.71)
.28 ( .23)
3.14 ( 3.14)
2.13 ( 2.15)
TEST NO. 082FET RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 73 MONTE CARLO
ENGINE 3.8 LI231. CID) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 743,71 MM HG(27.28 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 41, PCT
0 BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOUER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEO. C(DEG, F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC DCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 riCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX DCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPN
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MAGS CRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC. UET (DRY)
SCF, UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASUREB)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER.
HUMIDITY,
TEHPrpflTURE.
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
BEG C
G/KM
L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS, G/KM
C«»ON MONOXIDE, 0/KM
OXtnEG OF NITROGEN, G/KM
HFET VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11 5030--M7
VEHICLE NO.00
DATE 3/25/81
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 26.7 BEG C<30.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 9.2 GM/KG
HFET
800.1 (31.5)
787.4 (31.0)
43.3 (110.0)
61373.
114.7 ( 4059.)
27.U 2/ 20.
13.1/ 2/ 13.
28.1/13/ 26.
.1/13/ 0.
84.5/ 3/ 1.56
2.O/ 3/ .04
73.3/ 3/ 220.
.!/ 3/ 0.
8.54
16.
25.
1.53
217,6
1.04
3.29
3210.3
46.02
766.
.053 ( .071)
1.000 ( .772)
114.9
0.00
16.53
082FET
743.7
9.2
26.7
194.2
0.31
.06
.20
2.70
TEST HEIGHT 1580. KG< 3500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.0 KU( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-470-F
ODOMETER *««* KM(67544. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .95
D-26
-------
TABLE D -26. TEST NO. 086 EMISSIONS RESULTS
FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5030-007
TEST NO. 006FTP RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 70 MONTE CARLO
ENGINE 3.0 L(231. CID) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 745.24 MM HG<29.34 IN HG>
RELATIVE HU.1IDITY 52. PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOUER DIF P MH. H20(IN. H20>
DLOUER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLCT TEMP. DEC. C(DEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. HETRCSICCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCK6RD HCTCR/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE (1ETLR/RANCE/PPN
CO ECKCRO METER/RANGE7PPH
C02 SAMPLE KETER/RANGE/PCT
CD2 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKCRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
KC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRANS/KM
C02 GRAHG/KM
NOX CRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
SCf, DRY
DFC, yn (DRY)
SCF, UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 006FTP
BAROMETER MM IK 745.2
HUMIDITY G/KC 10.6
TEMPERATURE DEQ C 25.0
VEHICLE NO.OS
DATE 3/26/01
BAG CART NO. 1 / CVS NO. 2
BYNO NO. 3
DRY DULD TEMP, 25.0 DEC CI77.0 DEG F)
ABli. MUMIDI1Y 10.6 CM/KG
TEST UEIGIIT 1500. KG( 3500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 0.0 KU( 10.7 IIP)
GASOLINE EM--470-F
ODOMETER ««» KM(67573. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.00
1
:OLD TRANSIENT
707.4 (31.0)
782.3 <30.0)
43.1 (107.5)
40747.
76. 6 ( 2705.)
16. S/ 3/ 165.
1.5/ 3/ IS.
62. O/ 3/1571.
.17 3/ 2.
66. 0/ 3/ 1.20
3.27 3/ .05
44. 9/ 2/ 45.
.?/ 2/ 1.
9.01
152.
1506.
1.16
44.1
6.67
134.32
1620.4
6.44
1.15
23.03
277.0
1.10
13.56
500.
5.03
.972
.923 (
1.000 (
2
STABILIZED
707.4 (31.0)
702.3 (30.0)
41.7 (107.0)
69530.
131.1 ( 4620.)
31, 4/ 2/ 31.
13. O/ 2/ 13.
02.1/12/ 196.
.9/12/ 2.
46. 9/ 3/ .01
2. if 37 .04
11. 3/ 2/ 11,
.6/ 2/ 1.
16.15
19.
too.
.77
10.7
1.45
20.64
1040.6
2.68
.23
4.61
297.0
.43
13.05
067.
6.21
.976
.900)
.974)
207.7
0.00
12.04
13.30
3
HOT TRANSIENT
702.3 (30.0)
772.2 (30.4)
43.9 (111.0)
40477.
76.1 ( 2607.)
76. 1/ 2/ 76.
13. 7/ 2/ 14.
91.7/11/ 456.
.5/117 1.
61. O/ 3/ 1.00
2.0/ 3/ .04
36. 6/ 2/ 37.
.(,/ 2/ 1.
11.01
64.
438.
1.04
36.1
2.79
30.7?
1453.0
5.23
.40
6.63
240.3
.07
11.11
505.
5.05
.973
.931 (
1.000 (
4
STABILIZED
707.4 (31.0)
702.3 (30.0)
43.3 (110.0)
69490.
130.6 ( 4611.)
30. 2/ 2/ 30.
16. 2/ 2/ 16.
71.6/12/ 164.
.4/12/ 1.
45. O/ 3/ .79
3.3/ 3/ .05
10. 5/ 2/ 11.
.9/ 2/ 1.
16.63
15.
150.
.74
9.7
1.13
24.00
1767.4
2.40
.10
3.03
202.3
.30
12.33
060.
6.26
.976
.915)
.975)
206.7
0.00
12.12
11.74
3- BAG (4 -BAG)
CARBON
FULL C(
HYDROC*
CAREON
OXIDES
DIOXIDE G/KM
INSU.IPTION L/lOOMt
(RCOMS (TIIC) C/KM
MONOXIDE G/KM
OF NITROGEN C/KM
200.0 ( 275
12.62 ( 12.
.49 (
9.01 ( 0.
.70 (
.4)
41)
40)
77)
60)
TEST NO. 006FET RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 70 MONTE CARLO
ENGINE 3.0 L<231. CID) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 745.24 «H M0<29.34 IN HC)
RELATIVE HUMIIrlTY 51. PCT
0 BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
DLOUER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20(IN. 1120)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEO. CIDEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STB. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
IIC DCHGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKORD METER/RAWCE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANCE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX OCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
IIC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
GRAMS
GRAMS
CRAMS
CO MASS
C02 MASS
NOX MASS
RUN TIME
DFC. UET (DRY)
SCF, UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAH BLR (SCM)
KN (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,
MUMIBITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
SECONDS
MH HC
0/KG
BEG C
C/KM
L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS, G/Kfl
CARBON MONOXIDE, C/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
HFET VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11 5030-007
VEHICLE NO.00
DATE 3/26/01
BAG CART NO. 1
BYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY DULD TCHP. 26.7 DEG C(00.0 DEO F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11,4 GK/KG
HFET
000.1 (31.5)
707.4 (31.0)
43.9 (111.0)
61279.
114,9 ( 4050.)
47.2/ 2/ 47.
12.3/ 2/ 12.
77.7/12/ 102.
.1/127 0.
05.9/ 3/ 1.59
3.2/ 3/ .05
50.0/ 2/ 59.
,9/ 2/ 1.
8.30
36.
173.
1,55
50.0
2.41
23.10
3259.9
13.03
765.
.000 ( .065)
1.000 ( .969)
114.9
0.00
16.52
006FET
745.2
11.4
26.7
197.4
8.54
.15
1.40
.79
TEST UEIGHT 1500. KG! 3500. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 0.0 KW( 10.7 IIP)
GASOLINE EM-470-F
ODOMETER mm K«(67500. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1,02
D-27
-------
TEST NO. 007FTP RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 7D MONTE CARLO
ENGINE 3.0 L(231. CIB) V~4
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 740.16 MM HG(27.14 IN HO
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 60. PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF r MM. K20IIN. H20)
DLOUCR INLET J> KM. M20CIN. (120)
6LOUCR INLET TEMP. BEE. C(BEG. F)
DLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. HETREStSCD
HC SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
HC BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PPH
CO SAMPLE METER/RA.NGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANCE/PPh
NOX BCKBRD NETER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION FTN
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
)iC MASS GRAHS
CO MASS CRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAHS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
C02 CRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CD L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
SCF. DRY
DFC. UET (DRY)
SCF, UET (DRY)
VOL (5CM)
SAtl DLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER OC7FTP
BAROMETER Hit !IG 740.2
HUMIDITY 6/KG 12.2
TEMPERATURE DEO C 25.0
TABLE D-27. TEST NO. 087 EMISSIONS RESULTS
FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11 5830-007
VEHICLE NO.OB
DATE 3/27/01
BAG CART NO. 1 / CVS NO. 2
DYNO NO. 3
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.0 DEG C(77.0 DEG I
ADS. HUMIDITY 12.2 GM/KG
TEST HEIGHT 1500. KG( 3500. LDS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 0.0 KU< 10.7 HP)
*m«° K$(47611. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.05
1
COLD TRANSIENT
STABILIZED
HOT TRANSIENT
STABILIZED
782.3 (30.8)
774.7 (30.5)
43.1 (107.5)
40536.
75.7 ( 2674.)
17. 0/ 3/ 170.
1.2/ 3/ 12.
44. 2/ 3/1700.
.!/ 11 2.
67. O/ 3/ 1.20
2.7/ 3/ .04
44. O/ 2/ 45.
,fl/ 2/ 1.
9.47
177.
1426.
1.16
44.1
7.83
143.36
1612.7
6.71
1.35
24.66
277.5
1.15
13.48
505.
5.01
.970
.723
1.000
707.4 (31.0)
782.3 (30.0)
41.7 (107.0)
67540.
130.1 ( 4574.)
30. I/ 2/ 30.
10.5/ 2/ 11.
02.3/12/ 194.
.5/12/ 1.
46. 6/ 3/ .80
2.S/ 3/ .04
11. 3/ 2/ 11.
,11 2/ 1.
16.26
20.
109.
.77
10.6
1.52
28.57
1825.0
2.78
.24
4.57
273.3
.45
12.84
847.
6.22
.773
( .705)
( .772)
205.0
0.00
12.04
13.25
CARBON
FUEL CC
HYDROCf
CARBON
OXIBES
702.3 (30.0)
774.7 (30.5)
42,0 (107.0)
07.5/11/ 421*.
.l/ll/ 0.
41. 9/ 3/ 1.10
3.2/ 3/ .05
35. 3/ 2/ 35.
.5/ 2/ 1.
11.66
71.
403.
1,06
34.8
3,07
35.54
1463.5
5.30
.53
6.11
251.5
.71
11.22
505.
5.02
.771
.730 (
1.000 (
BIOXIBE G/KM
1NSUMPTION L/100HN
IRBOliO (TI!C) G/KM
MONOXIDE G/KM
OF NITROGEN C/KM
707. 4 (31.0)
777.2 (30.6)
43.3 (110.0)
127.4 < 4
27. 2/ 2/
10. 2/ 2/
70.4/12/
.1/12/
45. 7/ 3/
3.3/ 3/
10. O/ 2/
,S/ 21
16.61
18.
15S.
• 74
9.5
1.32
23.43
1757.0
2.40
.21
3.76
282.6
.40
12.34
867.
6.22
.773
.712)
.772)
205.3
0.00
12.04
11. BO
3- BAG
270.5
12.53
.55
7.18
.72
577.)
27.
10.
161.
&
.05
10.
1.
(4- BAG)
( 275.3)
( 12.42)
( .54)
( 0.93)
( .71)
TEST NO. 007FET RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 70 MONTE CARLO
ENGINE 3.0 L(231. CID) V-6
TRANSMISSION A3
DAROMETER 737.70 MM 110(27.13 IN NO
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 40. PCT
0 DAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
DLOUER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MO. II20UN. H20)
DLOUER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
6LOUCR REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC ICKGRD METER/RANGE/PPH
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE HCTER/RANGE/PCT
C02 DCWRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE MCTER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKORD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
!IC MASS CRAMS
CO MASS GRANS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC. UET (DRY)
SCF. UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
BAM BLR (SCM)
HH (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER.
HUMIDITY.
TEMPERATURE.
CARBON DIOXIDE.
FUEL CONSUMPTION.
MM I!G
G/KG
DEC C
G/KM
L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS. G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE. C/KH
OXIDES OF NITROGEN. G/KM
HFET VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5030-007
VEHICLE NO.00
DATE 3/27/01
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.0 DEO C(77.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 12.2 GM/KG
HTET
787.4 (31.0)
702.3 (30,0)
43.3 (110.0)
61277.
114.2 ( 4034.)
38.9/ 2/ 37.
7.4/ 2/ 10.
74.0/12/ 171.
.2/12/ 0.
06.0/ 3/ 1.57
2.6/ 3/ .04
54.4/ 2/ 57.
.7/ 2/ 1.
8.30
30.
162.
1.56
55.0
2.01
21.55
3261.7
12.02
765.
.000 ( .063)
1.000 ( .746)
114.2
0.00
16.46
007FET
737.7
12.2
25.0
170.1
G.56
.12
1.31
.78
TEST UEIGIIT 1508. KG( 3500. LDO)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.0 KU( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-470-T
ODOMETER ****** KM(6762i.* MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.05
D-28
-------
TABLE D-28. TEST NO. 091 EMISSIONS RESULTS
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5930-010
TEST NO. 091FTP RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 70 FORD FIESTA
ENGINE 1.4 L< 98. CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 738.12 m 110(29.04 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 44. PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOUER DIP P MM. H20IIN, H20)
BLOUER INLET P HH. H20UN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STB. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC rafr-LE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKCm METER/RANGE/PPIt
CO SAMPLE METER/RANOE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANCE/PPM
CG2 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE HETER/RAKfiEVPPN
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANCr/rPH
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPN
CO CONCENTRATION PPN
COS CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS BRAMS
HC GRANS/KM
CO GRf>MG/KH
C02 GRflHS/KN
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY C8 L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
SCFi DRY
DFC. UET (DRY)
SCFr ICT (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAN BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KH
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 091FTP
BAROMETER MM HC 738.1
HUMIDITY 6/KC 12.7
TOT'ERATURE DEG C 23.7
VEHICLE NO. 09
DATE 3/31/81
BAG CART NO. 1 /
, DYNO NO. 3
DRY BULB TEMP. 23
ADS, HUMIDITY 12.
1
COLD TRANSIENT
774.7 (30.5)
747.1 (30.2)
43.9 (111.0)
40551.
75.5 ( 2444.)
9.9/ 3/ 79.
1.3/ 3/ 13.
82.9/11/ 384.
.3/11/ 1.
47. 21 3/ .01
3.0/ 3/ .05
88. 4/ 2/ 88.
,8/ 2/ 1.
IS. 58
87.
349.
.77
87.7
3.78
32.43
1044.8
13.55
.45
5.57
182.8
2.33
8.24
SOS.
5.83
.971
.950 (
1.000 (
CVS NO. 2
TEST UEIGHT 907
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD
GASOLINE EH-470-
. KG( 2000. LBS)
4.0 KU( 5.4 HP)
ODOMETER »««*«« KM(47981, MILES)
.9 DEO C(75.0 DEO
7 CM/KG
2
STABILIZED
BOO.l (31.5)
797.4 (31.0)
38,9 (102.0)
49543.
128.3 ( 4531.)
32. 7/ 2/ 33.
12. 2/ 2/ 12.
17.2/13/ 14.
1.0/13/ 1,
32. 8/ It .55
3. I/ 3/ .05
37. 3/ 2/ 37.
,8/ 2/ 1.
24.34
21.
14.
.50
34.5
1.55
1175*5
9.40
.25
.34
18C..5
1.52
8.02
848.
4.30
.974
.930)
.973)
203.8
0.00
12.13
0.14
CARBON
FUEL C
HYDROC
CARBON
OXIDES
F)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.07
3
HOT TRANSIENT
900.1 (31.5)
787.4 (31.0)
41.1 (104.0)
40507.
75.5 ( 2447.)
49. 4/ 2/ 70.
13. 3/ 2/ 13.
44.2/13/ 42.
t.3/13/ 1.
40. 9/ 3/ .49
3.0/ 3/ .05
84. 9/ 2/ 87.
,11 2/ 1.
18.94
57.
59.
.45
94.2
2.48
5.14
900.4
13.14
.43
.90
154.7
2.32
4.91
505.
5.74
.972
.955 (
1.000 (
DIOXIDE G/KM
3NSUNPTION L/100KH
SREONS (THC) G/KM
MONOXIDE G/KN
OF NITROGEN G/KN
4
STABILIZED
797.4 (31.0)
744.5 (30.1)
37.0 (100.0)
49481.
130.9 ( 4419.)
31. O/ 2/ 31.
14. 2/ 2/ 14.
17.7/13/ 14.
1.3/13/ 1.
32, 4/ 3/ .54
3.3/ 3/ .05
34. a/ 2/ 37.
l.l/ 2/ 1.
24.50
17.
14.
.49
35.7
1.31
:.20
1182.4
9.57
.21
.35
190,3
1.54
8. in
847.
4.21
.974
.934)
.973)
204.3
0.00
11.94
7.52
3-BAG (4-BAG)
177.7 178.7)
7.74 7.78)
.38 .37)
1.57 1.58)
1.91 1.91)
TEST NO. 091FET RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 79 FORD FIESTA
ENGINE 1.4 L( 98. CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 739.14 MM 110(29.10 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 40. PCT
0 BAG RESULTS
TCST CYCLE
BLOUER DIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P »». H20(IN. H2D)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEO. C(D£G, F)
BLDUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. HETRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPN
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE HETER/RANSE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPlf
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRANS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC. UET (DRY)
SCF. UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAH BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TCST NUHBERi
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY.
TEMPERATURE*
CARBON DIOXIDE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KO
DEG C
G/KH
L/100KM
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-010
VEHICLE NO. 09
PATE 3/31/81
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEHP. 25.0 DEG C(77.0 DEO F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 12.2 GM/KG
BOO.l (31.5)
787.4 (31.0)
41.7 (107.0)
TEST UEIGHT 907, KG( 2000. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 4.0 KU( 5.4 KP)
GASOLINE EM-470-F
ODOMETER »»*««» KM(47994. HILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.05
44. 9/ 2/
13. 7/ 2/
14.2/13/
1.0/13/
5
47.
14.
13.
1.
5. 8/ 3/ .98
3.0/ 3/ .05
49. 2/ 3/ 148.
,4/ 3/ 1.
12.
.74
144.5
2.24
1.54
1942.9
33.70
745.
.924 (
1.000 (
114.4
0.00
14.38
909)
972)
HYDROCARBONS. G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE. G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
091FET
739.1
12.2
25.0
119.9
5.14
.14
.09
2.04
D-29
-------
TABLE D-29. TEST NO. 092 EMISSIONS RESULTS
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-010
TEST NO. 092FTP RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 FORD FIESTA
ENGINE 1,6 L( 98. CID) L~4
TRANSMISSION H4
BAROMETER 745.49 MM IIG(29.35 IN HO
RELATIVE HUMIBITY 49. PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
INSCRIPTION
BLOUER OIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MX. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEG. CIOEC. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC 8CKGRO METER/RANOE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
C0_ BCKGRD METER/RANOE/PPM
SAMPLE METER/RANOE/PCT
" ",GRD - - —
C02 BCKORD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKORO METER/RANGE/PPN
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRANS
HC GRANS/KH
CO GRAMS/KM
C02 GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CD L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
SCF. DRY
DFC. UET (DRY)
SCFr UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 092FTP
BAROMETER MM HG 743.5
HUMIDITY G/KG 9.9
TEMPERATURE DEC C 25.0
VEHICLE NO. 09
DATE 4/ 1/81
BAG CART NO. 1 / CVS NO. 2
DYNO NO. 3
DRY BULB TEMP.
ADS. HUMIDITY
1
COLD TRANSIENT
792,5 (31.2)
787.4 (31.0)
43.3 (110,0)
40563.
76.2 ( 2691.)
11. 0/ 3/ 110.
1.5/ 3/ 15.
82.5/11/ 381.
1.4/11/ 4.
44. 6/ 3/ .76
3.4/ 3/ .05
98. 2/ 2/ 89.
1.2/ 2/ 1.
366.
.72
87.1
4.21
12.36
.73
5.63
173.3
2.15
7.87
505.
5.76
.977
.952
1.000
25,0 DEG C(77.0 DEG
9.9 CM/KG
STABILIZED
792.5 (31.2)
787.4 (31.0)
42.8 (109.0)
69393.
130.5 ( 4607.)
31. 9/ 2/ 32.
14. 4/ 2/ 14.
21.6/13/ 20.
3.2/13/ 3.
32. 6/ 3/ .54
3.0/ 3/ .05
38. 7/ 2/ 39.
l.l/ 2/ 1.
24.48
18.
16.
,50
37.6
1.36
2.50
1190.2
9.15
.22
.40
191.9
1.48
8.25
865.
6.20
.979
( .937)
( .978)
206.7
0.00
11.96
8.07
CARBON
FUEL C(
HYDROC
CARBON
OXIDES
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 4.0 KU( 5.4 HP)
GASOLINE EH-470
ODOMETER ««** KH(68007. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .97
HOT TRANSIENT
787.4 (31.0)
782.3 (30.8)
43.1 (109.5)
40502.
76.2 ( 2690.)
81. 8/ 2/ 82,
13. 3/ 2/ 13.
63. 8/13/ 61.
1,2/137 1.
39. 7/ 3/ .67
3. If 3/ .05
89. 4/ 11 89.
l.O/ 2/ 1.
19.52
69.
59.
.63
88.5
3.04
5.21
874,6
12.55
.53
.90
151.8
2.18
6.61
505.
5.76
.978
dli !
DIOXIDE G/KN
NSUMPTION L/100KN
RBONS (THC> G/KM
MONOXIDE G/KM
OF NITROGEN G/KM
STABILIZED
792.5 (31.2)
787.4 (31.0)
42.8 (109.0)
130?75< 4614.)
22.'5/13/ 2l!
i.o/n/ i.
37.-7/ V 39.
l.O/ 2/ 1.
25*07
19.
.49
36.7
2.91
1165.3
8.95
.21
.47
188.8
1.45
0.12
868.
6.17
.979
.941)
.979)
206.9
0.00
11.93
7.39
3-BAG (4-DA8)
177.0 176.1)
7.72 7.68)
.41 .41)
1.62 1.64)
1.81 t.SO)
TEST NO. 092FET RUM 1
VEHICLE MODEL 70 FORD FIESTA
ENGINE 1.6 L( 98. CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 745.49 MM HG<29.35 IN NS)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 52. PCT
0 BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOUER DIF P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEG. CIDEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. HETRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
CO DCKORD METER/RANSE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PCT
C02 OCKGKD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 HASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRANS
RUN TIHE SECONDS
DFCf UET (DRY)
SCF. UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMDER.
BAROMETER*
HUMIDITY.
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION.
MM HG
G/KG
BEG C
0/KM
L/100KH
HFET VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-010
VEHICLE NO. 09
DATE 4/ 1/8
M
BAG CART NO
DYNO NO.
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEHP. 24.4 DES C(76.0 DE8 F)
ADS, HUMIDITY 10.2 GH/KG
HFET
792.5 (31.2)
787.4 (31.0)
43.3 (110.0)
61227.
115.0 ( 4061.)
44. 6/ 2/ 45.
10. 6/ 2/ 11.
TEST UEIGHT 907. KG( 2000. IBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 4,0 KU( 5.4 HP)
GASOLINE EM-470
ODOMETER ****** KMI68023. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .98
17.1/13/
.9/13/
HYDROCARBONS, G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN. G/KN
16.
.97
.05
53.6/ 3/ 159.
,3/ 3/ 1.
1.91
1958.4
34.15
765.
.927 ( .911)
1.000 ( .974)
115.0
0.00
16.32
092FET
74S.5
10.2
24.4
120.0
5.15
.14
.12
2.09
D-30
-------
TABLE D-30. TEST NO. 096 EMISSIONS RESULTS
TEST NO, 096FTP RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 FORD FIESTA
ENGINE 1.6 L( 98. CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION
BAROMETER 734.06 MM HO(2B.S>0 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 70. PCT
BOO RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOUER DIP P MX. H20UN, H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUCR INLET TEMP. DEO. C(DEG, F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. METRESfSCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD NETER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM
C02 GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAHS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TIME SECONDS
MEASURED DISTANCE KM
SCFr DRY
DFCi UET (DRY)
SCF» UET (DRY)
VOL (SCN)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
Fua CONSUMPTION L/100XM
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 096FTP
BAROMETER MM HG 734.1
HUMIDITY 6/KG 13.6
TEMPERATURE BEG C 23.9
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-010
VEHICLE NO.09
DATE V 3/81
BAG CART NO. 1 / CVS NO. 2
DYNO NO, 3
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.9 DEC CI73.0 PEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 13.6 GM/KG
TEST HEIGHT 907. KG( 2000. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 4.0 KU< 5.4 HP)
GASOLINE EM-470
ODOMETER »*«»«« KM(60033, MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.10
:OLD TRANSIENT
774.7 (30.5)
767.1 (30.2)
42.8 (109.0)
40532.
75.1 ( 2653.)
9.6/ 3/ 96.
1.2/ 3/ 12.
79.0/11/ 355.
.3/11/ 1.
44. 9/ 3/ ,77
2.4/ 3/ .04
78. 2/ 2/ 78.
1.2/ 2/ 1.
16.47
85,
341,
.74
77.1
3.67
29.83
1011.5
12.22
.63
5.15
174.6
2,11
7.88
305.
5.79
.970
.952
1.000
2
STABILIZED
787.4 (31.0)
702,3 (30.8)
42.8 (109.0)
69646.
128.8 ( 4549.)
29. I/ 2/ 29.
11. 7/ 2/ 12.
11. A/13/ 10.
.7/13/ 1.
32, 3/ 3/ .54
2.8/ 3/ .04
34. 6/ 2/ 35.
1.2/ 2/ 1,
24.62
18.
10.
.50
33.4
1.33
1,43
1177.9
9.10
.21
,23
189.3
1.46
0.13
868.
6.22
.972
< .930)
( .972)
204.0
0.00
12.01
8.01
CARBON
FUEL Cl
HYDROC*
CARBON
OXIDES
HOI TRANSIENT
782.3 (30.8)
774.7 (30.5)
42.8 (109.0)
40494.
73.0 ( 2648,)
59. 5/ 2/ 60.
ii.2/ 2/ a.
50.9/13/ 48.
.1/137 0.
39. If 3/ .68
3.2/ 3/ .05
82. 1/ 2/ 82.
1.2/ 2/ 1.
19.52
49,
46.
.63
81.0
2.11
4.04
864.0
12.61
.36
.70
148,8
2.21
6.45
505.
5.81
.971
.957 (
1.000 (
DIOXIDE G/KM
JNSUHPTION L/100KM
IRBONS (THC) G/KM
MONOXIDE G/KM
OF NITROGEN G/KM
4
STABILIZED
787.4 (31.0)
782.3 (30.8)
42.8 (109.0)
69535.
128.7 ( 4543.)
27. 3/ 2/ 27.
11, I/ 2/ 11,
10.2/13/ 9.
.1/13/ 0.
31. O/ 3/ .51
2.4/ 3/ .04
35. 4/ 2/ 35.
,B/ 2/ 1.
25.91
17.
9.
.48
34.6
1,23
1.32
1126.6
9.40
.20
.21
181.7
1.52
7.00
868.
6.20
.973
.735)
.972)
203.6
0.00
12.01
7.14
3-BAG (4-BAO)
175.1 ( 172.91
7.61 ( 7.52)
.34 ( .34)
1.38 ( 1.37)
1.80 ( 1.02)
TEST NO. 096FET RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 FORD FIESTA
ENGINE 1.6 L( 90. CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION
BAROMETER 733.55 MM HG(28.88 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 57, PCT
0 BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOUER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOKER INLET P MM, H20UN. H20)
BLOHER INLET TEMP. DEO. CIDEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANCE/PPM
HC DCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METCR/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUM TIME SECONDS
DFCf UET (DRY)
SCF. UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM DLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMDER.
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARDON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
DEO C
G/KM
L/100KN
HYDROCARBONS, G/KH
CARBON MONOXIDEr G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
•T VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-010
VEHICLE NO. 09
DATE 4/ 3/81
BAG CART NO, 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 26,1 DEG C179.0 DEO F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 12.6 GM/KO
HFET
792.5 (31.2)
787.4 (31.0)
42.8 (109.0)
61300.
113.2 ( 3998.)
35. 6/ 2/ 36.
11. ;/ 2/ 12.
11.0/13/ 10.
.1/13/ 0.
53. O/ 3/ .96
2,5/ 3/ .04
42. 3/ 3/ 127.
,3/ 3/ 1.
9.
.93
126.1
1.62
1,25
1925,3
29.11
765.
.920 ( .911)
1.000 ( .973)
113.2
0.00
16.43
096FET
733.6
12.6
26.1
117.2
5.02
.10
.08
1.77
TEST UEIGHT 907. KG< 2000. LDS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 4.0 KU( 5,4 HP)
GASOLINE EM-470
ODOMETER »»!»»« KM(60071. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.07
D-31
-------
TABLE D-.31. TEST NO. 101 EMISSIONS RESULTS
TEST NO. 101FTP RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL. 70 CHRYSLER N.Y.
ENGINE 6.6 L(400. CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROHETER 744.73 HH HG(29.32 IN 116)
RELATIVE HUMIBITY 40. PCI
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUnBER
DESCRIPTION
BLDUER DIF P HH. H20UN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20IIN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEC. C(DEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RAN6E/PPH
HC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
CO SAHPLE METER/RANGE/PPH
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPH
C02 SAHPLE HETER/RAN6E/PCT
C02 BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAHPLE METER/RANGE/PPH
NOX BCKGRO HETER/RANGE/PPH
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
HC HASS GRAHS
CO HASS GRAHS
C02 HASS GRAMS
NOX HASS GRAHS
HC GRAHS/KM
CO GRAH9/KM
C02 GRAHS/KH
NDX GRAHS/KH
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KH
RUN TIHE
MEASURED DISTANCE
SCFi DRY
DFCt UET (DRY)
SCF, UET (DRY)
VOL (SCH)
SAH BLR (SCH)
SECONDS
KM
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER
BAROHETER HH HG
HUMIDITY G/KG
TEMPERATURE DEG C
10IFTP
744.7
12.6
25.6
VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-010
VEHICLE NO.10
DATE 4/17/81
BAG CART NO. 1 / CVS NO. 2
DYNO NO. 3
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.6 DEC C(78.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 12.6 GH/KG
TEST HEIGHT 2268. KG( 9000. L8S)
ACTUAL ROAB LOAD 8.4 KU< 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EH-470-F
ODOMETER 10623. KH( 6601. MILES)
NOX HUHIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.07
.'OLD TRANSIENT
787.4 (31.0)
782.3 (30.8)
42.2 (108.0)
40549.
74.3 ( 2694.)
59. 5/ 3/ 595.
1.9/ 3/ 19.
64. 5/ 2/3371.
.!/ 2/ 4.
95. 6/ 3/ 1.80
2.8/ 3/ .04
32. 11 3/ 99.
.!/ 3/ 0.
6.16
579.
3186.
iitf
25.47
282.95
2458.3
15.32
4.38
48.70
423.1
2.64
21.92
505.
3.81
.964
.801 1
1.000 I
STABILIZED
792.5 (31.2)
787.4 (31.0)
42.8 (109.0)
69368.
130.7 ( 4614,)
24. It 3/ 249.
1.8/ 3/ 18.
70. 2/ 3/1828.
.!/ 3/ 2.
59. 1/ 3/ 1.05
2.6/ 3/ .04
43. O/ 2/ 43.
.9/ 2/ 1.
10.76
233.
1754.
42?2
17.33
266.79
2413.8
11.24
2.79
42.42
383.8
1.79
19.60
868.
6.29
.971
[ ,864)
! .963)
207.0
0.00
»?•»
20, 14
HOT TRANSIENT
774.7 (30.5)
747.1 (30.2)
43.3 (110.0)
40505.
76.2 ( 2691.)
24. It 3/ 249.
1.7/ 3/ 17.
56.0/ 3/1393.
.!/ 3/ 2.
03. 3/ 3/ 1.54
3.4/ 3/ .05
37. O/ 3/ 111.
.!/ 3/ 0.
7.90
234.
1323.
a»s
10.29
117.33
2082.9
17.22
1.76
20.12
357.0
2.95
16.83
506.
5.83
.966
.896 (
1,000 (
CARBON DIOXIDE 0/KH
FUEL CONSUHPTION L/100KH
HYDROC*
CARBON
OXIDES
IRBONS (THC) G/KH
HONOXIDE G/KM
OF NITROGEN G/KM
STABILIZED
787.4 (31.0)
782.3 (30.8)
43.3 (110,0)
69515.
130.5 ( 460?,)
20.2/ 3/ 202.
1.5/ 3/ 15.
64. 8/ 3/1637.
.!/ 3/ 2.
50. O/ 3/ 1.04
2.9/ 3/ .04
44. 4/ 2/ 44.
,6/ I/ 1.
11.00
180.
1590.
43??
14.18
241.53
2386.8
11.68
2.24
38.20
377.5
1.85
18.93
868.
4.32
.971
.879)
.969)
206.7
0.00
iHs
1/.Y9
3-BAG (4-BAG)
384.6 ( 382.7)
19.32 ( 19.14)
2.84 < 2.68)
37.40 I 36.37)
2.28 ( 2.30)
TEST NO. 101FET RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 CHRYSLER N.Y.
ENGINE 6.6 L(400. CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROHETER 744.73 MM HG(29,32 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 41. PCT
0 BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOUER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEG, CtOEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD, CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPN
C02 SAHPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPH
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
HC MASS GRAHS
CO MASS GRAHS
C02 HASS GRAHS
NOX HASS GRAHS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC, UET (DRY)
SCF, UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAH BLR (SCH)
KH (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER, NN HG
HUHIDITY, G/KG
TEHPERATURE, DEG C
CARBON DIOXIDE, G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION, L/100KH
HYDROCARBONS, G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN. G/KN
HFET VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-010
VEHICLE NO. 10
DATE 4/17/81
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO, 2
DRY DULD TEMP. 31.1 DEG C<88.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 11.8 GH/KG
HFET
612,8 (32.0)
800.1 (31.5)
43.3 (110.0)
61284.
114.7 ( 4052.)
10. 6/ 3/ 106.
1.2/ 3/ 12.
72.3/11/ 309.
50:7^ 2.28
1.4/ 2/ .05
36.67 3/ 110,
96.
291.
2,24
109.6
6.36
38.89
4698.3
24.89
763.
.827 ( ,816)
1.000 ( ,966)
114.7
0.00
16.65
101FET
744.7
11.8
31,1
282. 1
12,25
.38
2.33
1.49
TEST UEIGHT 2268. KG( 5000. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KU( 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EH-470-F
OOOHETER *l*m KM(46028. HILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.04
D-32
-------
TABLE D-32. TEST NO. 102 EMISSIONS RESULTS
FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-010
TEST NO. 102FTP RUN 1
VEHICLE HODEL 78 CHRYSLER N.r.
ENGINE 6.6 LMOO. CIO) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 740.16 HM HG(29.14 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIOITr 52. PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOUER DIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEC. CIDEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRO HETER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
Cfl2 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
COS BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPN
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM
CO GRAHS/KH
C02 GRABS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
RUN TIME
MEASURED DISTANCE
SCF, DRY
DFCt UET (DRY)
SCF. UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KH (MEASURED)
FUEL CONr
SECONDS
KM
ISUMPTION L/100KN
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 102FTP
BAROMETER MM H6 740,2
HUMIDITY 0/KG 13.1
TEMPERATURE DES C 28.3
VEHICLE NO, 10
DATE 4/20/81
BAG CART NO. 1 / CVS NO. 2
DYNO NO. 3
DRY BULD TEMP. 20.3 DEG C(03.0 DE3 F)
ABS. HUMIDITY 13.1 CM/KG
TEST UEIGHT 2268. HG1 5000. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KUI 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-470
ODOMETER »«l«l« KMI66045. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.08
1
:OLD TRANSIENT
774,7 (30.5)
767.1 (30.2)
43.3 (110.0)
40838.
76.3 ( 2675.)
\t.1l 4/1990.
.!/ 4/ 10.
64. 9/ 2/3400.
.!/ 2/ 4.
94. 2/ 3/ 1.77
3.2/ 3/ .05
33. V 3/ 100.
.27 3/ 1.
5.86
1982.
3224.
1.73
99.7
87.22
286.45
2411.6
15.78
IS. 01
49.29
415,0
2.71
23.05
509.
5.81
,967
,876 1
1,000 i
STABILIZED
777.2 (30.6)
772.2 (30.4)
43.3 (110.0)
69537.
129,9 ( 4586.)
91. S/ 3/ 815.
I.9/ 3/ 19.
30.3/ 3/ 910.
,4/ 3/ 9.
63. 2/ 3/ 1.13
2.67 ]/ .04
51. 3/ 2/ 51.
,4/ 2/ 0.
10.34
798.
867.
1.09
50.9
59.75
131.11
2593.9
13.71
9.57
20.99
415.3
2.20
20.43
868.
4.25
.973
[ .061)
1 .970)
206,2
0.00
12.06
21.69
HOT TRANSIENT
774.7 (30,5)
767.1 (30.2)
43.9 (111.0)
40510.
75,6 ( 2671.)
14, 4/ 4/1440,
,2/ 4/ 20.
58. 2/ 3/1457.
,3/ 3/ 7,
85, O/ 3/ 1.57
2,9/ 3/ .04
44. 9/ 3/ 135.
.2/ 3/ 1.
7.22
1423.
1383.
1.54
134.2
62.05
121.76
2126.2
21.04
10.67
20.94
365.7
3.62
18.46
506.
5.81
.968
.878 (
1.000 (
CAR8DN DIOXIDE G/KH
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
HYDROC*
CARBON
OXIDES
IRBONS (THC) G/KM
MONOXIDE G/KM
OF NITROGEN G/KM
STABILIZED
787.4 (31.0)
782.3 (30.8)
43.9 (111.0)
69447.
129.4 ( 4569.)
64.27 37 642.
1.9/ 3/ 19.
97. 6/ 3/2040.
,3/ 3/ 7.
65.07 3/ 1.16
2.7/ 3/ .04
61.47 27 61.
.8/ 2/ 1.
8,93
625.
2722.
1.13
40.7
46.64
410.05
2668.0
16.28
7.49
65.83
428,3
2,61
23.71
867.
6.23
.972
:?7,!
205.0
0.00
12.04
21.17
3-BAG (4-BAG)
401.6 ( 405.4)
20.43 ( 21.40)
11.00 ( 10.39)
26.84 ( 40.06)
2.69 ( 2.02)
TEST NO. 102FET RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 CHRYSLER N.Y.
ENGINE 6,6 LMOO. CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 740.16 Hit HS(29.14 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 39. PCT
0 BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOUER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. KOI IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DEG. CfDEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. METRES(GCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPN
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO BCKCRD METER/RAN6E/PP1
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RAN6E/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
• DFCr UET (DRY)
SCF, UET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCM)
KM (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER.
BAROMETER.
HUMIDITY.
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION.
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/KM
L/100KN
HYDROCARBONS, G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN, G/KM
HFET VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-010
VEHICLE NO.10
DATE 4/20/81
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 30.0 DEG C(t)6.0 DEG F)
ABS, HUMIDITY 10.8 GM/KG
HFET
812.8 (32.0)
807.7 (31,8)
43.9 (111.0)
61236.
113.7 ( 4014.)
98.4/ 3/ 904.
2.0/ 3/ 20.
78.7/11/ 353.
1.7/11/ 5.
52.5/ 2/ 2.38
1.67 27 .06
46.4/ 3/ 139.
,3/ 3/ 1.
5.34
968.
328,
2.33
138.5
63.43
43.45
4850.6
30.16
765.
.813 ( .802)
1.000 ( .965)
113.7
0.00
16.47
102FET
740.2
10,8
30.0
294.6
13.27
3.65
2,64
1,83
TEST UEIGHT 2268. KG( 5000, LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KU( 11,3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-470
ODOMETER ««»«»« KMI66061. MILCS)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.00
D-33
-------
TABKE
D-33.
FTP
TEST NO. 105 EMISSIONS RESULTS
TEST NO. 104FTP RUN 1
VEHICLE HOGEL 78 CHRYSLER N.Y.
ENGINE 6.4 L(400. CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 737.87 HH HG(29,05 IN NO
RELATIVE HUHIOITY 53, PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOUER DIP P HH. H20UN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P HH. H20
SAH BLR (SCH)
KH (HEASURED)
FUEL CONSUHPTION L/100KH
COHPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUHBER 106F7P
BAROHETER HH NO 737,9
HUHIDITY G/KG 11,2
TEHPERATURE DEB C 25.4
VEHICLE EHISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT H-5830-010
VEHICLE NO.10
DATE 4/22/81
BAG CART NO. 1 / CVS NO. 2
DYNO- NO. 3
DRY BULB TEHP. 25.6 DEG CC7B.O DEG F)
ABS. HUHIDITY 11.2 OH/KB
TEST UEIGHT 2248. KG( 5000. L8S)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 0.4 KU< 11.3 HP)
ODOHETER m«*°Km46U9. HILES)
NOX HUHIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.02
1
COLD TRANSIENT
772.2 (30.4)
747.1 (30.2)
43.3 (110.0)
40515.
l'.4/ 3/ 14*.
81. 7/ 3/2221.
'i',4/ 3/ '.05
80. 6/ 2/ 81.
l.O/ 2/ 1.
6.60
219.
2100.
1.75
79.8
9.54
184.54
2423.2
11.72
1.63
31.52
413.9
2.00
20.00
505.
5.85
.966
.888 (
1.000 (
STABILIZED
787.4 (31,0)
782.3 (30.8)
43.3 (110.0)
69574.
129.3 ( 4566.)
41 .4/ 2/ 42.
12. S/ 2/ 13.
S9.6/12/ 220.
1.7/12/ 3.
65. I/ 3/ 1.16
3.2/ 3/ .05
38. 9/ 2/ 39.
•'*i£ ''
50,
208.
1.12
38.1
3.74
31,37
2652.3
9.59
.59
4.97
420.1
1.52
18.34
868.
6.31
.972
.873)
1970)
204.8
0.00
12.17
19.14
CARBON
FUEL C(
HYDROft
CARDON
OXIDES
3
HOT TRANSIENT
787.4 (31.0)
782.3 (30.8)
43.3 (110.0)
40474.
75.2 ( 2654.)
10. 4/ 3/ 106.
I.I/ 3/ 12.
91.7/12/ 227.
1.5/12/ 3.
86. 9/ 3/ 1.61
3.7/ 3/ .04
94. 1/ 2/ 94.
l.l/ 2/ 1.
8.14
95.
214.
1.54
93.1
4.14
13.71
2153.5
13.44
.71
3.20
368.3
2.33
16.03
505.
5.85
.968
.900 (
1.000 I
DIOXIDE G/KH
1NSUHPTION L/100KH
IRBONS (THC) G/KN
HONOXIDE G/KH
OF NITROGEN G/KH
STABILIZED
792.5 (31.2)
787.4 (31.0)
43.3 (110.0)
69455.
129.0 ( 4555.)
31. 3/ 2/ 31.
12. 0/ 2/ 12.
45.8/13/ 43.
2. 8/13/ 3.
44. 3/ 3/ 1.15
3.8/ 3/ .04
41. 5/ 2/ 42.
l.l/ 2/ 1.
11.59
20.
39.
1.10
40.5
1.51
5.84
2587.4
10.17
.24
.93
410.8
1.41
17.63
047.
6.30
.972
.885)
.971)
204.2
0.00
12.14
16.86
3-BAG (4-BAG)
404.6 ( 401.9)
18.05 ( 17.84)
.84 ( .73)
9.90 ( 8.78)
1.84 ( 1.87)
TEST NO. 104FET RUN 1
VEHICLE NOBEL 78 CHRYSLER N.Y.
ENGINE 6.6 LI400, CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROHETER 737.87 HH HG(29.05 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUHIDITY 45. PCT
0 BAG RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLGUEft DIF P MN. H20(IM. H20)
BLOUER INLET P HH. H20UN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEHP, DEG. CIDEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. HETRES(SCF)
HC SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPN
HC BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAHPLE HETER/RANCE/PPH
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
C02 SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAHPLE HETER/RANGE/PPH
NOX BCKQRD HETER/RANGE/PPH
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
CO CONCENTRATION PPH
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPH
HC HASS GRAHS
CO HASS GRAHS
C02 HASS GRAHS
NOX HASS GRAHS
RUN TIHE SECONDS
DFC> UET (DRY)
SCFt UET (DRY)
VOL (SCI1)
SAH BLR (SCH)
KH (HEASURED)
TEST NUHDER,
BAROHETER,
IIUNIDirr,
TEHPERATUREr
CARBON DIOXIDE.
FUEL CONSUHPTION.
HH HG
G/KG
DEG C
G/KH
L/100KH
HYDROCARBONS. G/KH
CARBON HONOXIDE. G/KH
OXIDES OF NITROGEN. G/KH
ET VEHICLE EHISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-010
VEHICLE NO.10
DATE 4/22/81
BAG CART NO. 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEHP. 26.7 DEG CI80.0 DEG F)
ABS. HUHIDITY 10.0 GH/KG
HFET
800.1 (31.5)
792.5 (31.2)
43,3 (110.0)
61292.
113.7 ( 4015.)
46.0/ 2/ 46.
12.7/ 2/ 13.
82.6/13/ 82.
2.5/13/ 2.
50.3/ ;/ 2.26
1.7/ ^l .06
89.5/ 2/ 90,
.O/ 2/ 1.
5.91
35.
75.
2.21
88.8
2.32
9.99
4591.7
18,90
765.
.831 ( .819)
1.000 ( .965)
113,7
0.00
16.43
104FET
737,9
10.0
26.7
279.5
11.99
.14
.41
1.15
TEST UEIGHT 2268. KG( 5000. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8,4 KUI 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EH-470
ODOHETER *««** KH144124, HILES)
NOX HUHIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR .98
D-34
-------
TABLE D-34. TEST NO. 107 EMISSIONS RESULTS
FTP VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5830-010
TEST NO. 107FTP RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 CHRYSLER N.Y.
ENGINE 4,6 L(400. CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A]
BAROMETER 734.40 HN H8(29.00 IN HG>
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 44. PCT
BAG RESULTS
BAS NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOUER DIF P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MM. H20UN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DED. CIDEG. F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. HETRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPN
HC BCKGRD METER/RANG£/PP«
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPH
CO BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPN
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD MtTER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPN
NOX BCKGRD HETER/RAN6E/PPN
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPH
CO CONCENTRATION PPN
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 KASS GRANS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRANS/KN
CO GRAMS/KM
CQ2 GRANS/XH
NCX GRAHS/KH
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KN
RUN TIME
MEASURES DISTANCE
SCF. DRY
DFC. UET (DRY)
SCF. MET (DRY)
VOL (SCM)
SAM BLR (SCH)
SECONDS
KH
U100KN
COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER 107FTP
BAROMETER MN HG 734.4
HUMIDITY G/KG 12.2
TEMPERATURE DEG C 23.3
VEHICLE NO.10
DATE 4/23/81
BAG CART NO, 1 / CVS NO. 2
DYNO NO. 3
DRY BULB TEHP. 23.3 DEG C(74.0 DEG F)
ADS. HUMIDITY 12.2 GM/K6
TEST UEIGHT 2248. KG( 5000. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KU( a.3 HP)
GASOLINE EN-470
ODOMETCR *»«« KM(44182. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.05
1
:OLD TRANSIENT
782.3 (30.8)
777.2 (30.4)
43.3 (110,0)
40555.
7S.3 ( 2659.)
23. 5/ 3/ 235.
1.4/ 3/ 14,
84. 2/ 3/2384.
.!/ 3/ 2.
95. 5/ 3/ 1.79
3.7/ 3/ .04
78. 2/ 2/ 78.
l.l/ 2/ 1.
4,54
223.
2251.
9. *49
197.34
2404.4
11.71
1.45
33.47
410.5
2.00
20.00
505.
5.84
,942
.809 (
1.000 (
2
STABILIZED
787.4 (31.0)
782.3 (30.8)
43.3 (110.0)
49593.
129.1 ( 4559.)
44. I/ 2/ 44.
14. 11 2/ 15,
84.4/12/ 209.
1.1/12/ 2.
43. 8/ 3/ 1.14
3.0/ 3/ .05
39, 9/ 2/ 40.
1.4/ 2/ 1,
11.50
50.
199.
3.*74
29.84
2592.7
10.04
.40
4.73
410.8
1.59
17.93
848.
4.31
.948
.070)
.944)
204.4
0,00
19193
3
HOT TRANSIENT
782.3 (30,8)
777.2 (30.4)
43.3 (110,0)
40498.
75.2 ( 2455.)
92. 4/ 2/ 92.
14. 2/ 2/ 14.
92.9/12/ 231,
.B/12/ I,
84, I/ 3/ 1,40
2.8/ 3/ .04
32, 4/ 3/ 98.
,3/ 3/ 1.
8.23
80.
218.
97=0
3.44
19.04
2145,9
14.49
.59
3.24
345.2
2.50
15.89
505.
5.68
.944
.902 (
1.000 (
CARBON DIOXIDE 0/KN
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KN
HYDROD
CARBON
OXIDES
UiBONS (THC) G/KN
MONOXIDE 6/KM
OF NITROGEN G/KM
4
STABILIZED
787.4 (31.0)
782.3 (30.8)
43.3 (110.0)
49532.
129.0 ( 4554,)
45. 2/ 2/ 45.
14, 4/ 2/ 17.
52.2/12/ 111.
.7/12/ 1.
42, 9/ 3/ 1.12
3.3/ 3/ .05
41. S/ 2/ 42.
.8/ 2/ 1.
11.80
30.
105.
1.07
40.8
2.23
15.83
2537.5
10.59
.35
2.51
402.1
1.48
17.38
848.
4.31
.948
,883)
.947)
204.2
0,00
12.19
14.44
3-BAB (4-BA8)
398.2 ( 395.4)
17.80 ( 17.43)
.81 ( .74)
10.31 ( 9.44)
1.92 ( 1.95)
TEST NO. 107FET RUN 1
VEHICLE MODEL 78 CHRYSLER N.Y.
ENGINE 4.4 L(400. CIO) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 737.34 MN H0(2?.03 IN H6>
RELATIVE HUNIOITY 53. PCT
0 DA6 RESULTS
TEST CYCLE
BLOUER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET P MN. H20(IN. H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP. DE0. C(OEO, F)
BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOU STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPN
HC BCKGRD METER/RAN6E/PPN
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPN
CO BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPN
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RAN6E/PPH
NOX DCKSRD HETER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPN
CO CONCENTRATION PPN
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPN
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME SECONDS
DFC. UET (CRY)
SCF, UET (DRY)
VOL (SCN)
SAM BLR (SCH)
KH (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER!
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY,
TEMPERATURE,
CARBON DIOXIDE,
FUEL CONSUMPTION,
MM HG
G/KG
DEG C'
G/KN
L/100KN
HYDROCARBONS, G/KN
CARBON MONOXIDE, G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGENt G/KN
HFET VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
PROJECT 11-5930-010
VEHICLE NO.10
DATE 4/23/81
BAG CART NO, 1
DYNO NO. 3
CVS NO. 2
DRY BULB TEMP. 25.4 DEG CI78.0 DEB F)
ASS. HUMIDITY 11.3 GH/KO
HFET
807,7 (31.8)
800.1 (31.5)
43.3 (110.0)
41294.
113.5 ( 4009.)
50.8/ 2/ 51.
15.4/ 2/ 15,
95.4/13/ 97.
I.3/13/ 1.
50.2/ 2/ 2.25
l.S/ 2/ .05
32.7/ 3/ 98.
,3/ 3/ 1.
5.92
38.
90.
2.21
97.4
2.49
11.92
4585.0
21.52
744.
.831 I ,817)
1.000 ( .942)
113.5
0.00
14.48
107FCT
737.4
11.3
25.4
278.2
11.94
.15
.72
1.31
TEST HEIGHT 2248. KG( 5000. LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.4 KU( 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-470
ODOMETER ftlttt KM(44194. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR 1.02
D-35
-------
APPENDIX E
I/M SHORT TEST RESULTS
-------
TABLE E-l. CAR 01 I/M SHORT TEST RESULTS
1978 BUICK REGAL
Car As-Received Car Tuned-U£
HC, Emissions, rpm Hexane 012
50 mpha - 1700 rpm 68
Idle - Neutral 75
2500 rpm 67
Idle - Neutral 69
Idle - Drive 68
30 mpha - 1100 rpm 83
Idle - Neutral 85
CO Emissions Percent
50 mpha 0.01
Idle - Neutral 0.02
2500 rpm 0.02
Idle - Neutral 0.01
Idle - Drive 0.01
30 mpha 0.03
Idle - Neutral 0.01
Propane Enrichment, rpm
In Neutral
PCV in Place 760
As Above with Propane 820
PCV Valve Removed from Grommet 750
As Above with Propane 840
PCV Fresh Air Line Removed 750
As Above with Propane 820
In Drive
PCV in Place 560
As Above with Propane 570
PCV Valve Removed from Gormmet 570
As Above with Propane 580
PCV Fresh Air Line Removed 560
As Above with Propane 570
a
In Drive
E-2
-------
TABLE E-2. CAR 02 I/M SHORT TEST RESULTS
1979 MERCURY MARQUIS
Car As-Received Car Tuned- Up
HC, Emissions, rpm Hexane
50 mpha - 1500 rpm
Idle - Neutral
2500 rpm
Idle - Neutral
Idle - Drive
30 mpha - 1050 rpm
Idle - Neutral
67
81
91
CO_Emissions Percent
50 mpha
Idle - Neutral
2500 rpm
Idle - Neutral
Idle - Drive
30 mpha
Idle - Neutral
Propane Enrichment, rpm
In Neutral
PCV in Place
As Above with Propane
PCV Valve Removed from Grommet
As Above with Propane
PCV Fresh Air Line Removed
As Above with Propane
In Drive
PCV in Place
As Above with Propane
PCV Valve Removed from Gormmet
As Above with Propane
PCV Fresh Air Line Removed
As Above with Propane
0.00
0.10
0.02
0.02
0.10
0.01
0.02
880
920
890
940
870
920
600
600
610
610
600
600
In Drive
E-3
-------
TABLE E-3. CAR 03 I/M SHORT TEST RESULTS
1979 MERCURY MARQUIS
Car As-Received Car Tuned-Up
HC^ Emissions, rpm Hexane
50 mpha - 1500 rpm
Idle - Neutral
2500 rpm
Idle - Neutral
Idle - Drive
30 mpha - 1050 rpm
Idle - Neutral
CO Emissions Percent
50 mpha
Idle - Neutral
2500 rpm
Idle - Neutral
Idle - Drive
30 mpha
Idle - Neutral
rpm
Propane Enrichment,
In Neutral
PCV in Place
As Above with Propane
PCV Valve Removed from Grommet
As Above with Propane
PCV Fresh Air Line Removed
As Above with Propane
In Drive
PCV in Place
As Above with Propane
PCV Valve Removed from Gormmet
As Above with Propane
PCV Fresh Air Line Removed
As Above with Propane
032
63
315
98
164
107
116
130
0.01
2.46
0.27
0.43
0.29
0.29
0.24
1050
1060
1070
1080
1050
1060
640
640
650
650
640
640
037
58
383
93
166
121
130
164
0.00
2.31
0.26
0.32
0.26
0.36
0.21
975
985
970
1050
960
980
620
620
630
630
620
620
In Drive
E-4
-------
TABLE E-4. CAR 04 I/M SHORT TEST RESULTS
1978 FORD GRANADA
HC, Emissions, rpm Hexane
50 mpha - 1800 rpm
Idle - Neutral
2500 rpm
Idle - Neutral
Idle - Drive
30 mpha - 1150 rpm
Idle - Neutral
CO Emissions Percent
50 mpha
Idle - Neutral
2500 rpm
Idle - Neutral
Idle - Drive
30 mpha
Idle - Neutral
Propane Enrichment, rpm
In Neutral
PCV in Place
As Above with Propane
PCV Valve Removed from Grommet
As Above with Propane
PCV Fresh Air Line Removed
As Above with Propane
In Drive
PCV in Place
As Above with Propane
PCV Valve Removed from Gormmet
As Above with Propane
PCV Fresh Air Line Removed
As Above with Propane
Car As-Received
041
82
109
102
100
93
224
84
0.01
0.04
0.05
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.01
1050
1260
1055
1280
1070
1280
680
710
680
710
685
710
Car Tuned-Up
047
82
146
198
107
84
175
100
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.00
800
1100
765
1160
800
1100
610
660
570
675
610
660
In Drive
E-5
-------
TABLE E-5. CAR 05 I/M SHORT TEST RESULTS
1978 VOLVO 245DL CAL.
HC, Emissions, rpm Hexane
50 mpha - 2750 rpm
Idle - Neutral
2500 rpm
Idle - Neutral
Idle - Drive
30 mpha - 2250 rpm
Idle - Neutral
CO_Emissigns Percent
50 mpha
Idle - Neutral
2500 rpm
Idle - Neutral
Idle - Drive
30 mpha
Idle - Neutral
Propane Enrichment, rpm
In Neutral
PCV in Place
As Above with Propane
PCV Valve Removed from Grommet
As Above with Propane
PCV Fresh Air Line Removed
As Above with Propane
In Drive
PCV in Place
As Above with Propane
PCV Valve Removed from Gormmet
As Above with Propane
PCV Fresh Air Line Removed
As Above with Propane
Car As-Received
052
62
98
75
91
93
82
98
0.02
0.18
0.17
0.15
0.19
0.07
0.18
1080
1280
1130
1300
1100
1300
Car Tuned-Up
056
69
89
84
93
84
82
98
0.01
0.06
0.07
0.10
0.07
0.05
0.06
900
1140
940
1160
890
1135
In Drive
E-6.
-------
TABLE E-6. CAR 06 I/M SHORT TEST RESULTS
1978 OLDSMOBILE CUTLASS
^ Emissions , rpm Hexane
50 mpha - 2000
Idle - Neutral
2500 rpm
Idle - Neutral
Idle - Drive
30 mpha - 1250
Idle - Neutral
CO Emissions Percent
50 mpha
Idle - Neutral
2500 rpm
Idle - Neutral
Idle - Drive
30 mpha
Idle - Neutral
Propane Enrichment, rpm
In Neutral
PCV in Place
As Above with Propane
PCV Valve Removed from Grommet
As Above with Propane
PCV Fresh Air Line Removed
As Above with Propane
In Drive
PCV in Place
As Above with Propane
PCV Valve Removed from Gormmet
As Above with Propane
PCV Fresh Air Line Removed
As Above with Propane
Car As-Received
061
73
64
60
62
62
69
67
0.05
0.01
0.07
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.02
910
1040
910
1030
880
1090
640
660
640
660
625
680
Car Tuned-Up
067
62
82
64
78
62
60
62
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.01
900
1130
910
1140
880
1190
640
695
650
700
620
710
In Drive
E-7
-------
TABLE E-7. CAR 07 I/M SHORT TEST RESULTS
1978 CHEVROLET MALIBU CAL.
Car As-Received Car Tuned-Up
^ Emissions, rpm Hexane
50 mpha - 1700 rPm
Idle - Neutral
2500 rpm
Idle - Neutral
Idle - Drive
30 mpha - 1100 rpm
Idle - Neutral
071
60
64
64
64
82
67
64
078
67
87
152
116
84
212
CO Emissions Percent
50 mpha
Idle - Neutral
2500 rpm
Idle - Neutral
Idle - Drive
30 mpha
Idle - Neutral
0.01
0.05
0.02
0.06
0.09
0.09
0.05
0.03
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.03
Propane Enrichment, rpm
In Neutral
PCV in Place
As Above with Propane
PCV Valve Removed from Grommet
As Above with Propane
PCV Fresh Air Line Removed
As Above with Propane
In Drive
PCV in Place
As Above with Propane
PCV Valve Removed from Gormmet
As Above with Propane
PCV Fresh Air Line Removed
As Above with Propane
980
1000
975
1010
950
980
630
630
630
640
610
620
640
810
630
850
650
810
560
625
550
640
560
625
In Drive
E-J
-------
TABLE E-8. CAR 08 I/M SHORT TEST RESULTS
1978 MONTE CARLO
HC^_ Emissions, rpm Hexane
50 mpha - 1800 rpm
Idle - Neutral
2500 rpm
Idle - Neutral
Idle - Drive
30 mpha - 1150 rpm
Idle - Neutral
CO Emissions Percent
50 mpha
Idle - Neutral
2500 rpm
Idle - Neutral
Idle - Drive
30 mpha
Idle - Neutral
Propane Enrichment, rpm
In Neutral
PCV in Place
As Above with Propane
PCV Valve Removed from Grommet
As Above with Propane
PCV Fresh Air Line Removed
As Above with Propane
In Dri ve
PCV in Place
As Above with Propane
PCV Valve Removed from Gormmet
As Above with Propane
PCV Fresh Air Line Removed
As Above with Propane
Car As-Received
081
64
102
56
100
62
58
114
0.00
0.08
0.01
0.05
0.01
0.00
0.01
970
1600
1000
1550
980
1550
670
800
630
810
680
800
Car Tuned-Up
086
60
91
89
93
58
67
125
0.02
0.01
0.48
0.01
0.04
0.01
0.01
870
1150
855
1170
890
1145
640
675
620
685
630
675
In Drive
E-9
-------
TABLE E-9. CAR 09 I/M SHORT TEST RESULTS
1978 FORD FIESTA
Car As-Received Car Tuned-Up
HC7 Emissions, rpm Hexane 092 096
50 mpha - 2625 rpm 109 107
Idle - Neutral 400 476
2500 rpm 102 152
Idle - Neutral 372 332
Idle - Drive 150 389
30 mpha - 2300 rpm 221 134
Idle - Neutral 75 107
CO Emissions Percent
50 mpha 0.00 0.00
Idle - Neutral 1.94 1.33
2500 rpm 0-03 0.10
Idle - Neutral 0.19 0.19
Idle - Drive 0.09 0>14
30 mPha 0.03 0.06
Idle - Neutral 0.02 0.02
Propane Enrichment, rpm
In Neutral
PCV in Place 975 830
As Above with Propane 98Q 870
PCV Valve Removed from Grommet 950 830
As Above with Propane 1040 940
PCV Fresh Air Line Removed 939 820
As Above with Propane 950
In Drive
PCV in Place
As Above with Propane
PCV Valve Removed from Gormmet
As Above with Propane
PCV Fresh Air Line Removed
As Above with Propane
a
In Drive
E-10
-------
TABLE E-10. CAR 10 I/M SHORT TEST RESULTS
1978 CHRYSLER NEW YORKER
Car As-Received Car Tuned-Up
HCj, Emissions, rpm Hexane 102 107
50 mpha - 2000 rpm
Idle - Neutral 483+ 193
2500 rpm 483+ io7
Idle - Neutral 483+ 84
Idle - Drive 483+ 75
30 mpha - H60 rpm 433+ 100
Idle - Neutral 483+ 84
CO Emissions Percent
50 mpha 0.02 0.02
Idle - Neutral 1.24 0.08
2500 rpm 0.16 0.03
Idle - Neutral 0.59 0.08
Idle - Drive 0.46 0.04
30 mpha 0.14 0.17
Idle - Neutral 0.47 0.08
Propane Enrichment, rpm
In Neutral
PCV in Place 815 755
As Above with Propane 815 845
PCV Valve Removed from Grommet 820 760
As Above with Propane 850 850
PCV Fresh Air Line Removed 815 765
As Above with Propane 820 825
In Drive
PCV in Place 650 620
As Above with Propane 650 640
PCV Valve Removed from Gormmet 650 615
As Above with Propane 655 655
PCV Fresh Air Line Removed 645 620
As Above with Propane 650 645
a
In Drive
E-ll
-------
APPENDIX F
AVERAGE VALUES FOR FTP AND HFET RESULTS
-------
TABLE F-l. CAR 01 AVERAGE FTP AND HFET RESULTS
FOR THE AS RECEIVED AND AFTER TUNE-UP TESTS
Test No.
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
WT
mm Hg
gAg
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Carbon Dioxide, g/krn
Fuel Cons., £/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC>, g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes & Ketones
Fo rma1dehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Methylethylketone
Hexanaldehyde
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except at Noted)
FTP
As- After
Received Tune-Up
011-012
744.2
5.6
21.1
22.71
0.61
300.7
13.95
1.06
14.55
0.94
31.22
10.5
360.9
0.22
0.05
6.31
1.99
0.00
26.40
8.83
1.62
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
As- After
Received Tune-Up
011-012
744.1
5.5
22.0
15.63
0.85
223.2
9.60
0.18
0.67
0.89
17.42
5.1
75.9
0.01
0.02
2.44
0.93
0.00
9.78
3.73
0.93
0.38
0.00
0.00
F-2
-------
TABLE F-l (Cont'd). CAR 01 AVERAGE FTP AND HFET RESULTS
FOR THE AS RECEIVED AND AFTER TUNE-UP TESTS
Average Emission Rates, mg/km
Test No.
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Bisulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Trace Elements3
Sodium
Sulfur
Vanadium
Magnesium
Chlorine
Aluminum
Manganese
Zinc
Silicon
Calcium
Iron
Phosphorus
Titanium
Bromine
FTP
Received Tune-Up
011-012
68.31
87.73
16.63
18.70
0.75
39.46
54.08
75.23
0.15
0.07
0.01
0.00
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.03
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.12
0.02
0.00
0.00
HFET
Received Tune-Up
011-012
23.48
15.05
8.86
0.52
0.15
8.84
9.43
9.56
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.02
0.07
0.01
0.00
0.00
aThis table excludes all elements having measured values consistently
below 0.01 mg/km.
F-3
-------
TABLE F-2. CAR 02 AVERAGE FTP AND HFET RESULTS
FOR THE AS RECEIVED AND AFTER TUNE-UP TESTS
Test No.
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
WT
mm Hg
g/kg
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons.
km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Parti culates
Total Particulates
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Methylethylketone
Hexanaldehyde
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except at Noted)
FTP
As- After
Received Tune-Up
021-022
754.5
3.6
20.3
27.09
5.23
383.0
16.64
0.43
3.48
1.43
16.75
0.3
167.1
0.45
0.00
12.27
0.12
0.00
58.55
0.00
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
As- After
Received Tune-Up
021-022
754.8
3.8
22.5
17.57
4.65
251.8
10.79
0.16
0.29
1.27
38.36
2.2
64.3
0.04
0.00
6.15
0.19
o.oo
36.21
2.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
F-4
-------
TABLE F-2 (Cont'd). CAR 02 AVERAGE FTP AND HFET RESULTS
FOR THE AS RECEIVED AND AFTER TUNE-UP TESTS
Average Emission Rates, rag/km
Test No.
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethy1amine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Trace Elements3
Sodium
Sulfur
Vanadium
Magnesium
Chlorine
FTP
Received Tune-Up
021-022
85.36
25.58
15.24
7.22
0.85
5.65
11.09
16.09
0.44
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.01
HFET
Received Tune-Up
021-022
35.83
10.97
9.85
0.00
0.51
1.67
3.10
2.42
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
Aluminum
Manganese
Zinc
Silicon
Calcium
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.01
Iron
Phosphorus
Titanium
Bromine
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
aThis table excludes all elements having measured values consistently
below 0.01 mgAm.
F-5
-------
TABLE F-3. CAR 03 AVERAGE FTP AND HFET RESULTS
FOR THE AS RECEIVED AND AFTER TUNE-UP TESTS
Test No.
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
WT
mm Hg
g/kg
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., i/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Methylethylketone
Hexanaldehyde
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except at Noted)
FTP
As-
Received
031-032
734.5
7.9
20.9
28.08
4.45
397.1
17.25
0.42
3.68
1.03
23.71
3.9
163.4
0.55
0.03
1.45
0.07
0.00
53 . 41
2.88
1.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
After
Tune-Up
036-037
758.5
2.2
20.6
26.87
5.29
381.6
16.50
0.42
2.41
1.07
15.84
1.8
177.2
0.12
0.01
3.37
0.32
0.00
49.10
0.94
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
AS-
Received
031-032
746.8
8.1
23.1
18.06
4.20
256.9
11.09
0.17
1.59
1.56
21.51
0.0
66.8
0.16
0.00
3.31
0.38
0.00
67.62
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
After
Tune-Up
036-037
758.5
2.0
23.1
17.39
4.94
249.2
10.68
0.11
0.40
1.43
11.06
3.3 -
52.7
0.08
0.00
3.42
0.03
0.00
61.04
3.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
F-6
-------
TABLE F-3 (Cont'd). CAR 03 AVERAGE FTP AND HFET RESULTS
FOR THE AS RECEIVED AND AFTER TUNE-UP TESTS
Average Emission Rates, mg/km
Test No.
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethyiene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Bisulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethy1amine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Trace Elements3
Sodium
Sulfur
Vanadium
Magnesium
Chlorine
Aluminum
Manganese
Zinc
Silicon
Calcium
Iron
Phosphorus
Titanium
Bromine
Received
031-032
87.08
16.06
12.64
7.13"
0.15
4.16
13.23
22.93
0.50
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.16
0.02
0.50
0.01
0.02
0.17
FTP
Tune-Up
036-037
100.85
16.02
14.36
5.28
1.17
4.20
11.49
23.82
0.10
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.11
0.01
0.00
0.10
0.04
0.95
0.02
0.00
0.04
HFET
Received
031-032
35.09
9.22
8.67
0.00
0.00
2.00
5.05
6.71
0.13
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.28
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.02
0.11
0.00
0.02
0.06
Tune -Up
036-037
37.78
3.27
7.61
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.04
1.98
0.06
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.89
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
aThis table excludes all elements having measured values consistently
below 0.01 mg/km.
F-7
-------
TABLE F-4. CAR 04 AVERAGE FTP AND HFET RESULTS
FOR THE AS RECEIVED AND AFTER TUNE-UP TESTS
Test No.
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
WT
mm Hg
gAg
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., H/IOQ km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes s_Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Methylethylketone
Hexanaldehyde
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except at Noted)
FTP
As-
Received
041-042
742.5
9.1
25.6
30.41
423.3
18.68
1.08
7.02
0.62
36.17
6.5
421.2
0.00
0.00
5.06
0.63
0.00
7.28
5.38
1.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
After
Tune-Up
046
742.2
11.4
25.0
29.83
8.06
416.8
18.32
1.12
5.61
0.67
44.31
9.1
' 431.6
0.00
0.00
3.38
0.98
0.00
6.10
7.37
1.68
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
As-
Received
041-042
742.6
9.7
26.7
20.10
283.7
12.35
0.54.
2.47
0.68
29.92
4.8
238.4
0.00
0.00
2.61
0.77
0.00
8.25
3.59
1.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
After
Tune -Up
046
742.2
12.2
26.7
20.12
8.44
284.8
12.36
0.65
1.79
0.77
27.95
4.8
251.3
0.00
0.00
3.91
0.99
0.00
8.43
4.53
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
F-8
-------
TABLE F-4 (Cont'd). CAR 04 AVERAGE FTP AND HFET RESULTS
FOR THE AS RECEIVED AND AFTER TUNE-UP TESTS
Average Emission Rates, mg/km
Test No.
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sul fides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monome thy1amine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Trace Elements3
Sodium
Sulfur
Vanadium
Magnesium
Chlorine
Aluminum
Manganese
Zinc
Silicon
Calcium
Iron
Phosphorus
Titanium
Bromine
FTP
HFET
Received Tune-Up
041-042
046
Received Tune-Up
041-042
046
133.70
82.93
42.76
18.43
2.55
29.75
37.29
73.81
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.02
0.92
0.06
0.54
0.02
0.00
0.12
121.63
85.20
42.30
45.56
0.95
28.27
33.34
74.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.13
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.07
0.16
0.04
0.43
0.05
0.00
0.13
76.15
50.52
26.36
9.24
1.32
18.25
20.55
35.98
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
1.17
0.05
0.31
0.01
0.03
0.00
76.32
51.61
25.91
9.09
0.44
17.73
22.48
47.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.16
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.79
0.03
0.21
0.03
0.01
0.11
aThis table excludes all elements having measured values consistently
below 0.01 mg/km.
F-9
-------
TABLE F-5. CAR 05 AVERAGE FTP AND HFET RESULTS
FOR THE AS RECEIVED AND AFTER TUNE-UP TESTS
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except at Noted)
WT
mm Hg
Test No.
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., H/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes s Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Methylethylketone
Hexanaldehyde
FTP
As-
Received
051-052
738.7
10.3
23.6
21.50
0.49
302.4
13.21
0.38
3.68
0.50
8.38
2.6
200.9
0.11
0.00
19.04
0.72
0.00
106.11
1.75
0.85
0.00
0.00
After
Tune-Up
056-057
736.4
7.9
25.6
20.31
0.93
285.9
12.48
0.38
3.34
0.55
2.02
1.3
182.8
0.04
0..00
31.49
0.85
0.00
122.66
0.41
0.82
0.00
0.12
0.00
HFET
AS-
Received
051-052
738.3
10.9
25.6
12.73
0.17
180.1
7.82
0.24
1.54
0.29
2.14
0.7
124.0
0.02
0.00
6.50
0.53
0.00
91.53
0.50
0.17
0.00
0.00
0.00
After
Tune-Up
056-058
741.1
8.1
24.7
12.71
0.17
180.3
7.81
0.24
1.17
0.30
2.73
0.2
123.6
0.04
0.00
20.83
0.45
0.00
116.35
0.02
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
F-10
-------
TABLE F-5 (Cont'd). CAR 05 AVERAGE FTP AND HFET RESULTS
FOR THE AS RECEIVED AND AFTER TUNE-UP TESTS
Average Emission Rates, mg/km
Test No.
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfide s
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Trace Elements3
Sodium
Sulfur
Vanadium
Magnesium
Chlorine
Aluminum
Manganese
Zinc
Silicon
Calcium
Iron
Phosphorus
Titanium
Bromine
Received
051-052
54.61
42.40
12.84
3.80
1.02
17.94
30.55
37.78
0.09
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.01
0.05
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.12
0.50
0.02
0.00
0.21
FTP
Tune- Up
056-057
52.37
35.39
12.17
2.94
0.58
15.32
26.22
37.83
0.04
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.09
0.21
0.02
0.00
0.20
HFET
Received
051-052
27.49
31.45
8.20
0.00
0.14
16.11
17.07
23.49
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.08
0.01
0.11
0.00
Tune-Up
056-058
27.75
30.57
8.65
0.00
0.37
16.49
16.09
23.67
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.06
0.17
0.01
0.01
0.16
aThis table excludes all elements having measured values consistently
below 0.01 ragAm.
F-ll
-------
TABLE F-6. CAR 06 AVERAGE FTP AND HFET RESULTS
FOR THE AS RECEIVED AND AFTER TUNE-UP TESTS
Test No.
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
WT
mm Hg
g/kg
°C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons. , H/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC) , gAm
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes S Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Methylethylketone
Hexanaldehyde
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except at Noted)
FTP
As-
Received
061-062
751.7
6.4
23.9
20.22
0.98
275.0
12.42
0.54
9.11
2.16
19.28
3.6
237.8
0.05
0.00
13.51
5.77
0.00
145.01
1.13
2.14
0.00
0.25
0.00
After
Tune-Up
066-068
748.3
7.7
24.7
20.79
1.33
284.3
12.77
0.48
8.52
0.68
17.71
2.6
226.3
0.04
0.00
6.80
1.99
0.05
42.69
1.22
1.21
0.00
0.11
0.00
HFET
As-
Received
061-062
751.8
7.0
25.3
14.51
0.87
207.0
8.91
0.12
0.86
2.93
11.72
1.1
55.8
0.03
0.00
10.20
2.12
0.00
91.66
0.10
0.70
0.26
0.00
0.00
After
Tune-Up
066-067
738.5
7.8
24.5
15.05
0.79
214.7
9.24
0.10
0.94
0.68
11.44
1.0
52.9
0.02
0.00
3.40
0.39
0.00
24.63
0.60
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
F-12
-------
TABLE F-6 (Cont'd). CAR 06 AVERAGE FTP AND HFET RESULTS
FOR THE AS RECEIVED AND AFTER TUNE-UP TESTS
Average Emission Rates, mg/km
Test No.
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monome thy1ami ne
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Trace Elements3-
Sodium
Sulfur
Vanadium
Magnesium
Chlorine
Aluminum
Manganese
Zinc
Silicon
Calcium
Iron
Phosphorus
Titanium
Bromine
Received
061-062
54.21
45.12
9.69
15.08
0.37
22.76
32.04
58.54
0.05
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.03
0.04
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.37
0.03
0.00
0.09
FTP
Tune-Up
066-068
55.71
44.15
12.06
17.67
1.83
17.15
27.32
50.37
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.03
0.00
0.02
0.03
0.17
0.20
0.02
0.00
0.06
HFET
Received
061-062
22.82
10.62
4.88
0.00
0.00
3.71
5.38
8.35
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.13
0.01
0.00
0.05
Tune-Up
066-067
22.41
9.78
4.93
0.00
0.75
2.82
5.23
6.92
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.01
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.11
0.01
0.00
0.21
SThis table excludes all elements having measured values consistently
below 0.01 mgAm.
F-13
-------
TABLE F-7. CAR 07 AVERAGE FTP AND HFET RESULTS
FOR THE AS RECEIVED AND AFTER TUNE-UP TESTS
Test No.
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
WT
mm Hg
gAg
°C
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., i/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes S_Ketones
Fo rma1dehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Methylethylketone
Hexanaldehyde
Average Emission Rate, mgAm (Except at Noted)
FTP
As-
Received
071-072
742.1
5.6
23.9
27.40
4.18
380.1
16.83
0.40
8.22
0.45
30.79
7.7
234.3
0.08
0.00
2.64
0.70
0.00
2.39
6.36
1.33
0.00
0.00
0.00
After
Tune-Up
076-078
745.3
6.2
23.9
26.48
5.13
367.9
16.26
0.41
7.57
0.44
38.04
8.5
215.2
0.04
0.00
12.68
0.27
0.00
3.45
7.68
0.84
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
As-
Received
071-072
742.3
5.4
25.0
17.26
4.98
245.7
10.60
0.11
1.45
0.37
20.44
5.3
66.2
0.07
0.00
4.54
0.22
0.00
2.28
4.57
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
After
Tune-Up
076-078
744.6
7.0
27.0
17.75
4.99
252.6
10.91
0.13
1.60
0.36
24.94
7.7
73.5
0.02
0.00
3.79
0.17
0.00
2.49
6.61
1.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
F-14
-------
TABLE F-7 (Cont'd). CAR 07 AVERAGE FTP AND HFET RESULTS
FOR THE AS RECEIVED AND AFTER TUNE-UP TESTS
Average Emission Rates, mg/km
Test No.
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propyiene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monome thy land ne
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylaraine
Triethylamine
Trace Elements3
Sodium
Sulfur
Magnesium
Chlorine
Aluminum
Zinc
Silicon
Calcium
Iron
Phosphorus
Arsenic
Molybdenum
Tungsten
Strontium
Received
071-072
89.27
48.45
12.15
8.66
0.58
16.47
21.17
37.56
0.05
0.01
0.02
0.01
0-00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.10
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.03
0.09
0.22
0.32
0,02
0.04
0.27
0.00
0.16
FTP
Tune-Up
076-078
70.33
52.35
10.43
7.71
0.13
16.48
20.95
36.85
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.08
0.10
0.01
0.00
0.28
0.00
0.19
Received
071-072
19.41
24.02
3.81
0.72
0.00
5.49
6.07
6.67
0-05
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.17
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.05
0.06
0.01
0.00
0.27
0.04
0.17
HFET
Tune-Up
076-078
20.98
26.17
3.28
1.67
0.00
5.76
6.83
8.81
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.53
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.03
0.04
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.04
aThis table excludes all elements having measured values consistently below
0.01 mg/km.
F-15
-------
TABLE F-8. CAR 08 AVERAGE FTP AND HFET RESULTS
FOR THE AS RECEIVED AND AFTER TUNE-UP TESTS
Test No.
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
WT
mm Hg
gAg
Total Fuel Sulfur, rag/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons.
a/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes s Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Methylethylketone
Hexanaldehyde
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except at Noted)
FTP
As-
Received
081-082
745.1
6.8
25.6
20.80
2.93
293.7
12.78
0.28
3.07
2.09
19.90
5.3
106.9
0.06
0.00
6.74
1.22
0.00
38.86
5.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
After
Tune-Up
086-087
742.7
11.4
25.0
20.52
1.35
279.3
12.60
0.52
.9.10
0.71
37.66
1.6
239.8
0.07
0.00
3.93
2.09
0.02
31.78
1.27
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
As-
Received
081-082
745.7
7.5
26.2
13.70
2.58
192.7
8.41
0.07
0.16
2.57
12.29
3.3
22.0
0.02
0.00
3.23
0.20
0.00
18.88
2.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.92
After
Tune-Up
086-087
742.6
11.8
25.9
13.92
0.85
197.8
8.55
0.14
1.36
0.79
16.29
0.6
62.3
0.01
0.00
3.72
0.44
0.00
28.12
0.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
F-16
-------
TABLE F-8 (Confd). CAR 08 AVERAGE FTP AND HFET RESULTS
FOR THE AS RECEIVED AND AFTER TUNE-UP TESTS
Average Emission Rates, mg/km
Test No.
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Disulfide
Organic Amines
Monome thy1ami ne
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylarnine
Trace Elements3
Sulfur
Magnesium
Chlorine
Aluminum
Potassium
Zinc
Silicon
Calcium
Iron
Phosphorus
Arsenic
Molybdenum
Tungsten
Strontium
Received
081-082
21.35
24.60
6.53
5.92
0.14
9.71
11.21
27.46
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.06
0.49
0.01
0.02
0.17
0.02
0.12
FTP
Tune-Up
086-087
51.62
49.87
13.29
15.37
0.57
21.97
30.29
56.82
0.03
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.23
0.03
0.14
Received
081-082
7.34
5.99
2.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.07
4.32
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.00
0.01
0.07
0.14
0.01
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.03
HFET
Tune-Up
086-087
21.18
12.92
5.49
0.00
0.00
5.22
6.92
10.57
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.07
0.01
0.00
0.15
0.03
0.12
This table excludes elements having measured values consistently below
0.01 mg/km
F-17
-------
TABLE F-9. CAR 09 AVERAGE FTP AND HFET RESULTS
FOR THE AS RECEIVED AND AFTER TUNE-UP TESTS
Average Emission Rate, mg/km. (Except at Noted)
Test No.
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
WT
mm Hg
gAg
Total Fuel Sulfur, mg/km
Avg. Exh. Oxygen, %
Carbon Dioxide, g/km
Fuel Cons., Si/100 km
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC), g/km
Carbon Monoxide, g/km
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes s Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Methylethylketone
Hexanaldehyde
FTP
AS-
Received
091-092
741.8
11.3
24.5
12.59
7.49
177.4
7.73
0.40
1.60
1.86
35.09
1.7
99.5
0.03
0.00
2.43
0.21
0.00
9.39
1.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
After
Tune-Up
096
734.1
13.6
23.9
12.39
7.43
175.1
7.61
0.34
1.38
'1.80
33.42
1.3
104.9
0.01
0.00
2.19
0.35
0.00
6.54
1.34
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HFET
As-
Received
091-092
742.3
11.2
24.7
8.38
6.89
120.0
5.15
0.14
0.11
2.08
29.46
0.9
30.4
0.00
0.00
1.37
0.25
0.00
7.28
0.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
After
Tune-Up
096
733.6
12.6
26.1
8.17
7.07
117.2
5.02
0.10
0.08
1.77
19.86
2.4
0.00
0.00
2.49
0.31
0.00
5.64
2.45
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
F-18
-------
TABLE F-9 (Cont'd). CAR 09 AVERAGE FTP AND HFET RESULTS
FOR THE AS RECEIVED AND AFTER TUNE-UP TESTS
Average Emission Rates, mg/km
Test No.
Individual Hydrocarbons
Methane
Ethylene
Ethane
Acetylene
Propane
Propylene
Benzene
Toluene
Organic Sulfides
Carbonyl Sulfide
Methyl Sulfide
Ethyl Sulfide
Methyl Bisulfide
Organic Amines
Monomethylamine
Monoethylamine
Trimethylamine
Diethylamine
Triethylamine
Trace Elements3
Sulfur
Vanadium
Chlorine
Al uminum
Potassium
Zinc
Silicon
Calcium
Iron
Phosphorus
Arsenic
Molybdenum
Tungsten
Strontium
Received
091-092
24.56
24.76
9.80
6.78
0.52
5.07
7.82
20.23
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.26
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.06
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.00
0.15
FTP
Tune-Up
096
32.90
25.00
10.27
4.95
0.00
4.44
6.13
21.25
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.08
0.19
0.02
0.00
0.18
0.05
0.16
HFET
Received
091-092
6.17
14.70
4.11
0.00
0.02
1.84
2.09
1.45
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.31
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.17
0.00
0.12
Tune -Up
096
__
—
—
—
_,—
—
—
—
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.47
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
This table excludes all elements having measured values consistently below
0.01 mg/km.
F-19
-------
TABLE F-10. CAR 10 AVERAGE FTP AND HFET RESULTS
FOR THE AS RECEIVED AND AFTER TUNE-UP TESTS
Test No.
Barometer,
Humidity,
Temperature,
Total Fuel Sulfur,
Avg. Exh. Oxygen,
Carbon Dioxide,
Fuel Cons. , £/
Regulated Emissions
Hydrocarbons (THC)
Carbon Monoxide,
Oxides of Nitrogen, g/km
Particulates
Total Particulates
Compound Group Totals
Aldehydes & Ketones
Individual Hydrocarbons
Organic Sulfides
Organic Amines
Other Compounds
Ammonia
Cyanide & Cyanogen
Hydrogen Sulfide
Nitrous Oxide
Aldehydes s Ketones
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone
Methylethylketone
Hexanaldehyde
Average Emission Rate, mg/km (Except at Noted)
WT
mm Hg
gAg
°c
mg/km
%
g/km
.00 km
g/km
g/km
g/km
FTP
As-
Received
101
744.7
12.6
25.6
31.45
—
384.6
19.32
2.84
37.60
2.28
After
Tune-Up
106-107
737.3
11.7
24.5
29.19
1.26
401.4
17.93
0.83
10.15
1.88
HFET
As-
Received
101
744.7
11.8
31.1
19.94
—
282.1
12.25
0.38
2.33
1.49
After
Tune-Up
106-107
737.7
10.7
26.2
19.48
1.78
278.9
11.97
0.15
0.67
1.23
264.23
83.41
71.46
61.89
19.8
1262.1
0.03
0.00
6.0
470.6
0.03
0.00
8.1
290.2
0.01
0.00
2.1
71.2
0.03
0.00
3.29
1.91
0.25
12.94
17.01
2.82
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.30
0.23
0.27
12.93
5.81
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.77
0.12
0.13
13.01
6.44
1.66
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.28
0.12
0.06
8.53
1.68
0.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
F-20
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Inf&uctions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
EPA-460/3-81-024
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION-NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
CHARACTERIZATION OF EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM HIGH
MILEAGE CATALYST-EQUIPPED AUTOMOBILES
5. REPORT DATE
September 1981
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
Lawrence R. Smith
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO
9. PERFORMING ORG 1.NIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Southwest Research Institute
6220 Culebra Road
San Antonio, Texas 78284
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
68-03-2884
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final Report(9/80 - 6/81)
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
This report describes the laboratory effort to characterize regulated
and unregulated exhaust emissions from ten 1978 and 1979 high mileage
catalyst equipped gasoline automobiles which have been driven for
approximately 50,000 miles. The ten automobiles were evaluated
as-received and after a tune-up to manufacturer's specifications,
over the Light-Duty Federal Test Procedure (FTP) and the Highway
Fuel Economy Driving Schedule (HFET). Exhaust constituents measured,
in addition to the regulated emissions, include: aldehydes, parti-
culates, sulfides, amines, metals, and several additional elements
and compounds. Additional evaluations involved the measurement of
the regulated emissions over four short-test procedures.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
b. IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
COSATI Held/Group
Air Pollution
Exhaust Emissions
Gasoline Engines
Motor Vehicles
Catalytic Converters
Emissions Characterizatio
Emission Test Procedures
Light-Duty Vehicles
3. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release Unlimited
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
Unclassified
21. NO. OF PAGES
190
20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
Unclassified
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
------- |