United States
            Environmental Protection
            Agency
               Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
               Emission Control Technology Division
               2565 Plymouth Road
               Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
EPA-460/3-82-002
November 1981
            Air
&EPA
Characterization of Diesel  Emissions
From Operation  of a  Light-Duty
Diesel Vehicle  on  Alternate Source
Diesel Fuels

-------
                                     EPA-460/3-82-002
 Characterization of Diesel Emissions From
Operation of a Light-Duty  Diesel Vehicle on
         Alternate Source Diesel Fuels
                             by

                         Bruce B. Bykowski

                      Southwest Research Institute
                         6220 Culebra Road
                       San Antonio, Texas 78284

                       Contract No. 68-03-2884
                        Task Specification 3

                    EPA Project Officer: Robert J. Garbe
                  Task Technical Officer: Thomas M. Baines


                          Prepared for

                  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                  Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
                    Emission Control Technology Division
                        2565 Plymouth Road
                      Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105


                         November 1981

-------
This report is issued by the Environmental Protection Agency to report
technical data of interest to a limited number of readers.  Copies are
available free of charge to Federal employees, current contractors and
grantees, and nonprofit organizations - in limited quantities - from
the Library Services Office (MD-33), Research Triangle Park, North
Carolina  27711; or, for a fee, from the National Technical Information
Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia  22161.
This report was furnished to the Environmental Protection Agency by
Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, Texas,
in fulfillment of Task Specification 3 of Contract No. 68-03-2884.
The contents of this report are reproduced herein as received from
Southwest Research Institute.  The opinions, findings, and conclusions
expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the
Environmental Protection Agency.  Mention of company or product names
is not to be considered as an endorsement by the Environmental Protec-
tion agency.
                      Publication No. EPA-460/3-82-002

                                    ii

-------
                                 FOREWORD
     This project was conducted for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
by the Department of Emissions Research, Southwest Research Institute.  The
laboratory testing phase of the project began in June 1980, and was completed
in October 1981.  The work was performed under EPA Contract No. 68-03-2884,
Task Specification Number 3, and was identified within Southwest Research
Institute as Project 05-5830-003.  The scope of work defined by EPA is located
in Appendix A of this report.  The EPA Project Officer was Mr. Robert J. Garbe,
and the Task Technical Officer was Mr. Thomas M. Baines, both of the Character-
ization and Technical Applications Branch, Emission Control Technology Division,
Environmental Protection Agency, 2565 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan.  The
Southwest Research Institute Project Manager was Charles T. Hare, and the
Project Leader and Principal Investigator was Bruce B. Bykowski.
                                    111

-------
                                 ABSTRACT
     This report describes laboratory emissions evaluation of several alter-
nate-source fuels in a 1980 Volkswagen Rabbit Diesel.  Fuels tested included
a No. 2 petroleum diesel as base,  base plus coal-derived liquids, shale oil
diesel fuel and jet fuel, and a blend of petroleum blend stocks with coal and
shale liquids.  Nine fuels were investigated in all, including the base fuel.

     Vehicle operating procedures  used for test purposes included those
specified in Federal Regulations (FTP)^* and several steady-state modes.
Both regulated and unregulated gaseous and particulate emissions were measured
using a CVS-PDP and dilution tunnel operating on the entire exhaust stream of
the engine.  DOAS odor analysis was performed on raw exhaust samples during
steady-state operation.  Biological response evaluation, BaP measurement, and
HPLC fractionation were conducted  on the organic soluble portion of the par-
ticulate.  The majority of the sampling and analytical procedures used were
developed during earlier EPA Contracts 68-02-2494<2} 68-03-2707<3}  68-02-1230
and 68-03-2440.
  Numbers  in  parentheses  designate  references  at  the  end  of  this  report.
                                     IV

-------
                               TABLE OF  CONTENTS

                                                                     Page

FOREWORD                                                              iii

ABSTRACT                                                               iv

LIST OF FIGURES                                                       vii

LIST OF TABLES                                                       viii

I.   INTRODUCTION                                                       1

II.  SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS                                            3

III. TEST VEHICLE AND FUELS                                             7

     A.   Test Vehicle                                                  7
     B.   Test Fuels                                                    9

IV.  INSTRUMENTATION AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES                         13

     A.   Vehicle Operation and  Smoke Measurements                     13
     B.   Regulated and Unregulated Gaseous Emissions                  14
     C.   Particulate Collection, Mass  Rate, and Aerodynamic  Sizing    14
     D.   Analysis of Particulate Composition                          21
     E.   Analysis of the Soluble Fraction of Particulate Matter       21

V.   TEST PLANS AND OPERATING  SCHEDULE                                 23

VI.  GASEOUS EMISSION AND ODOR RESULTS                                 27

     A.   Regulated Gaseous Emission Results                           27
     B.   Aldehyde and Phenol  Results                                  31
     C.   Results of Odor Analysis                                     34

VII. SMOKE AND PARTICULATE EMISSION RESULTS                            43

     A.   Visible Smoke Emissions                                      43
     B.   Particulate Mass Emission Rates                              44
     C.   Particulate Size Distribution                                46
     D.   Analysis of Particulate Composition                          46
     E.   Composition of Organic Solubles in Particulate Matter        51
     F.   Gas Chromatograph "Boiling Range" Analysis of Organic
          Solubles                                                     51
     G.   Fractionation by Relative Polarity                           54
     H.   Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) in Organic Solubles                     59
     I.   Mutagenic Activity by Ames Testing                           61

REFERENCES                                                             65
                                     v

-------
                       TABLE OF CONTENTS  (CONT'D)

APPENDICES

     A.   Contract 68-03-2884, Task Specification Number  3
          Scope of Work
     B.   Volkswagen Rabbit Lab-To-Lab Correlation Results
     C.   Gaseous Emissions Data
     D.   Particulate Emission Results
                                     VI

-------
                               LIST OF FIGURES

Figure                                                              Page

  1       Heated Hydrocarbon Analyzer System                          15

  2       Schematic Diagram of Exhaust Dilution Tunnel                18

  3       Volkswagen Rabbit During Test                               19

  4       Unloading of 20x20 Filter from Holder                       19

  5       Particle Sizing Impactor, Disassembled                      20

  6       Filter Weighing in a Temperature- and Humidity-
          Controlled Chamber                                          20

  7       Regulated Gaseous Emissions  During FTP (Composite)           30

  8       Regulated Gaseous Emissions  During HFET                      32

  9       Fuel Consumption Emissions  During FTP and HFET               33

 10       "Total" Aldehyde and Phenol Emissions During FTP             36

 11       "Total" Aldehdye and Phenol Emissions During HFET            39

 12       Odor Analysis at Three Steady-States                        41

 13       Particulate Mass Emissions  During FTP and HFET  cycle         45

 14       Cumulative Particle Size Distribution by Impactor           49

 15       HPLC Response to BaP and 9-Fluorenone                       55

 16       HPLC Response to Extract Generated from Base DF-2           55

 17       HPLC Response to Extract Generated from Shale Diesel Marine 56

 18       HPLC Response to Extract Generated from Paraho JP-5         56

 19       HPLC Response to Extract Generated from Coal Case 5A        57

 20       HPLC Response to Extract Generated from Broadcut            57

 21       HPLC Response to Extract Generated from 25% SRC-II          58

 22       HPLC Response to Extract Generated from 25% EDS             58

 23       BaP Emissions During FTP                                    60

                                     vii

-------
                             LIST OF TABLES

Table                                                               Page

  1       Description of Test Vehicle                                  7

  2       Comparative Emission Data,  Three Laboratories      .          8

  3       Comparison of FTP Emissions from Two VW Rabbits              9

  4       Fuel Properties and Composition                             10

  5       Heated Hydrocarbon Analyzer Overflow Calibration and
          Sample Flow Schematic Component Description                 16

  6       Outline of Chemical and Physical Exhaust Evaluations        24

  7       Test Plan for Each Fuel                                     25

  8       Average Regulated Gaseous Emissions Data During FTP         28

  9       Average Regulated Gaseous Emissions Data During HFET
          and Steady-State                                            29

 10       FTP Aldehyde Emissions Data                                 35

 11       FTP Phenol Emissions Data                                   37

 12       HFET Phenol and Aldehyde Emission Data                      38

 13       Results of Odor Analysis at Steady-State                    40

 14       Summary of Visible Smoke Data                               43

 15       Average Particulate Mass Emission Data                      44

 16       Particulate Size Distribution                               47

 17       Cumulative Particle Size Distribution During Cold and
          Hot Start                                                   17

 18       Carbon and Hydrogen in Exhaust Particulate Matter           50

 19       Composition of Organic Solubles from Particulate Matter     52

 20       Chromatograph Analysis of Organic Solubles in
          Particulate Matter                                          53

 21       BaP Present in Organic Solubles During FTP  + FTP           59
                                                    c      h
                                    Vlll

-------
                          LIST OF TABLES  (CONT'D)

Table                                                               Page


 22       Summary of Ames Bioassay Analysis of Organic Solubles
          from Particulate Matter Collected During FTP                62

 23       Summary of Ames Bioassay Results in Revertants Per
          Distance During FTP                                         64
                                     IX

-------
                             I.  INTRODUCTION
     The world's supply of crude oil is being depleted, creating incentives
for discovery and utilization of alternate sources of fuel.  This study was
designed to determine whether or not currently available alternate-source
diesel fuels would disproportionately increase regulated or currently unreg-
ulated emissions.  A light-duty diesel vehicle was used for test purposes.
Diesels offer more sensitive evaluation of alternate fuel effects than gas-
oline cars do.  No exhaust aftertreatment system has to be used on diesel
automobiles to meet HC and CO standards for 1982, but a catalytic converter
system is used on gasoline-fueled vehicles.  Changes in diesel exhaust emis-
sions due to alternate fuels thus affect the atmosphere and the recipient
directly, but the catalyst on a gasoline vehicle tends to reduce the impact
of changes in emissions seen in the raw exhaust.

     This study began with optimism that alternate non-petroleum fuels were
available in sufficient quantities for vehicle testing.  As the search went
on for sources, a more realistic view surfaced.  Alternate fuel research is
basically still in its infancy in terms of large-volume production.  Pilot
plant yields are small, and the cost for pilot plant production of quantities
suitable for testing in this program was prohibitive.  Materials available
in test quantities mostly represented first-generation alternate-source
materials.  As second-generation processes move from laboratories and pilot
plants to larger volume production, studies such as this one could be
applied  to the resulting specification-quality materials for comparison
purposes.  It is the intent of this report, therefore, to report findings
on the effects of first generation alternative-source liquids on emissions
from a light-duty diesel vehicle.  In many cases, these currently-available
liquids did not have the specifications to run "as is".  These liquids were
blended with a petroleum base fuel to permit observation of any changes in
emissions.

     Selection of compounds and mixtures was made on the basis of avail-
ability, variety, and anticipation of second-generation compositions.  Sub-
stances investigated include coal-derived liquids from both the Solvent
Refined Coal (SRC-II) and Exxon Donor Solvent (EDS) processes, shale oil
products, a broadcut fuel containing n-butane among other stocks, and a
mixture of coal, shale and petroleum products.

-------
                       II.  SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
     The major objective of this project was to study the effects of avail-
able alternate-source fuels on exhaust emissions from one diesel vehicle, a
1980 Volkswagen Rabbit.  The vehicle was operated on a Chassis dynamometer
following two transient cycles  (FTP and HFET), and periodically, several
steady-states.  Nine fuels were tested.  Some of the test fuels were blends
of a base No. 2 diesel and alternate-source materials, while others were
fuels formulated in another study dealing with refinery modeling for alter-
native fuels.

     One of the major challenges in performing this work was acquisition of
sufficient quantities of "state-of-the-art" alternate-source materials.  In
most cases, these materials were still in the laboratory on pilot plant
phases of production.  Such processed materials were described as "second-
generation" alternate-source materials.  Only second-generation shale oil
liquids were available in sufficient quantities for test.  First-generation
coal-derived liquids from two refinery processes (SRC-II and EDS),  however,
were available in sufficient quantities for test.  It was therefore the
intention of this study to report the effects of currently available alter-
nate-source fuels on light-duty diesel emissions, and to perform detailed
analyses of their compositions.

     The test format was designed to produce the maximum amounts of emis-
sions characterization information with as little vehicle operating time as
possible.  Physical and chemical properties of the fuels tested varied widely.
Gaseous and particulate emissions collection and analyses were performed using
techniques developed in earlier work.

     The most important observations and conclusions reached as a result of
this project (not necessarily in order) are listed below.  Unless stated
otherwise, all fuels will be compared to the base fuel.

     1.   First-generation coal-derived liquids exhibiting boiling
         ranges similar to petroleum-based diesel fuels  could not
         be used "as is" in a diesel engine.  Cetane numbers for
         the straight liquids used in this study were approximately
         25 or below.  Blends with petroleum-based diesel fuel were
         required.

     2.   Second-generation shale oil liquids exhibiting boiling ranges
         similar to petroleum-based diesel fuels had cetane numbers
         greater than 44,  and could be used "as is" in a diesel engine.

-------
 3.  High gum levels in some blends  (60 mg/100 m£) did not
     affect short-term engine operation.

 4.  The greatest regulated gaseous emission increases during
     the FTP were observed with the Broadcut and 25% SRC-II
     test fuels.  Hydrocarbon emissions more than doubled with
     these two fuels.  All fuels tested showed increased NOX
     emissions.

 5.  No "total" aldehyde increases were observed during the
     FTP and HFET.  Decreases were seen with the two coal-
     derived liquid blends, 25% SRC-II and 25% EDS.

 6.  The 25% EDS blend doubled the "total" phenol emissions
     during the FTP, but a large increase was not observed
     during the HFET.  The 25% SRC-II blend did not affect
     phenol emissions during the FTP, but increased phenol
     emissions during the HFET by a factor of 14.

 7.  Instrumental odor analysis indicated that the Coal Case
     5A and the Broadcut fuel slightly increased odor inten-
     sity in three steady-state modes.

 8.  Visible smoke production was generally increased with
     use of test fuels containing coal-derived liquids.

 9.  During the FTP, the 25% SRC-II blend increased the par-
     ticulate mass rate 56 percent over the base fuel.  However,
     during the HFET, the particulate rate was similar to the
     base.  The other coal-derived fuel blends increased par-
     ticulate emissions slightly.  Broadcut fuel reduced par-
     ticulate emissions 16 percent during the FTP, and 32 percent
     during the HFET.

10.  Organic soluble increases of 39 percent were associated
     with the Broadcut and SRC-II test fuels during the FTP.
     During the HFET, the Broadcut fuel again increased the
     amount of solubles,  but the SRC-II blend did not.

11.  Carbon and hydrogen analysis of the organic soluble por-
     tion of the particulate matter indicated no appreciable
     difference between the fuels tested.

12.  The boiling range determination of the organic solubles
     showed that the Broadcut fuel yielded the largest amount
     of compounds boiling under 640°C.

-------
13.  HPLC analysis on the organic solubles generated during the
     FTP indicated the presence of substantial amounts of PNA-
     type compounds from all the fuels tested.  Considerable
     response in the transition area was observed with use of
     the Paraho JP-5, Broadcut, and Coal Case 5A.

14.  BaP emissions were significant for all fuels tested.
     Levels were about 10 times higher than seen in other
     studies.  Coal Case 5A was associated with the highest
     BaP emission during the FTP.  Other increases were ob-
     served with the Shale Diesel Marine, Paraho JP-5, Broadcut,
     and 25% EDS test fuels.

15.  The organic extract of the particulates from all fuels
     tested yielded positive Ames response, as has generally
     been observed in most studies.  In the majority of cases,
     metabolic activation reduced Ames activity on all five
     strains, implying the presence of direct-acting mutagens.
     The greatest Ames responses were associated with the 25%
     SRC-II and the Broadcut fuel on strain TA-100.

-------
                       III.  TEST VEHICLE AND FUELS
     The major criteria used for selection of a test vehicle were avail-
ability, and the potential to utilize a data base acquired on a similar
vehicle during previous studies.  Fuel selection was principally a matter
of availability of alternate-source  (non-petroleum) materials.  Alternate-
source materials were subjected to thorough analyses to establish the
properties of each fuel tested in detail.

A.   Test Vehicle

     The vehicle chosen was a 1980 Volkswagen Rabbit.  A description of
the vehicle is provided in Table 1.  This Rabbit was supplied to the Con-
tractor by EPA for test purposes.

                    TABLE 1.  DESCRIPTION OF TEST VEHICLE
            Vehicle Model
            Engine Model
            Model Year

            V.I.N.
            Engine No.

            Body Type
            Inertia equivalent, kg  (lbm)

            Transmission

            Displacement
            Cylinders
            Power, kW (hp) @ rpm
            Injection System
            Combustion Chamber
            Compression Ratio

            Distance on Vehicle, km
Volkswagen Rabbit
Family D
1980

17A0926720
CK591126

2-Door Hatchback
1021 (2250)

5 speed manual

1.47 (90)
4
(48) @ 5000
Bosch
Swirl Chamber
23:1

2806
             At end of project
     Baseline comparison tests were performed on the vehicles as received,
using the fuel remaining in the vehicle tank from EPA tests.  The test results
are summarized in Table 2, with EPA and Volkswagen of America (VWOA) data.

-------
HC, g/km
CO, g/km
NOX, g/km
Parti culate, g/km
Fuel, a/100 km
VWOAa
0.25
0.92
0.65
6.14
EPA
0.33
0.80
0.63
0.22
5.88
SwRI
0.33
0.95
0.67
0.29
6.22
           TABLE 2.  COMPARATIVE EMISSION DATA, THREE LABORATORIES

                     Average FTP Emissions         Average FET Emissions
                                                      EPA        SwRI

                                                     0.11        0.19
                                                     0.43        0.71
                                                     0.44        0.47
                                                     0.15        0.22
                                                     4.35        4.89
a.
 Fuel not identical to that used at EPA and SwRI

Complete test results can be found in Appendix B, pages B-2 through B-5.
The dynamometer on which the tests were performed at SwRI was checked
thoroughly after the tests, and the speed and load calibrations were ac-
curate.  Coast-down checks on the SwRI dynamometer indicated that the
actual power absorption was slightly higher than the curve used.  The dif-
ference  (2.9%) was not considered sufficient to have caused the entire
difference between SwRI FET results and those of EPA.  Gas analyzers used
for the test work were calibrated just after the runs and found to be
accurate.

     An additional retest was performed with comparable results.  The
additional retest exhausted the supply of fuel which was in the  fuel tank,
so further direct comparison testing between laboratories was no longer pos-
sible.  A fourth, and final, comparison test using another No. 2 diesel fuel
was performed.  These results, along with a summary table and computer print-
outs, are located in Appendix B, pages B-6 through B-10.  It should be noted
that all comparison testing involved vehicle operation through all 5 gears,
inertia set at 1077 kg (2375 Ib), and actual road load of 5.1 kW (6.8 hp) .

     Vehicle operation during actual testing of alternative-source fuels
attempted to simulate that of a 1977 Volkswagen which was used in an earlier
study.(6)  inertia setting was 1021 kg (2250 Ib), and actual road load was
5.4 kW (7.3 hp).   During tests, only 4 of the 5 gears were used, to be con-
sistent with the older Volkswagen's 4-speed manual transmission.  It was
hoped that the two Rabbits would give similar baseline results, so that the
data base of the earlier study could be coupled with the results generated
in this study.   The results of a cross comparison between the two Rabbits
is shown in Table 3.   Fuels run in each Rabbit were both "National Average"
No.  2 diesel,  but were not from the same lot.  The properties of the two
fuels were almost identical.  Results comparing the two Rabbits over other
cycles are listed in  Appendix B, page B-ll.

-------
         TABLE  3.   COMPARISON  OF  FTPa  EMISSIONS FROM TWO VW RABBITS
                               Earlier Rabbit,     Current Rabbit,
             Emissions         Fuel EM-239-F      Fuel EM-329-F
         HC,  g/km                  0.20               0.31
         CO,  g/km                  0.51               0.96
         NOX,  g/km                 0.65               0.62
         Particulate,  gAm         0.218b              0.249C
         Fuel,  VlOO km            5.60               6.38
         a.
          3-bag composite
          Based on 47  mm glass  fiber filters
          Based on 47  mm Pallflex filters


B.   Test Fuels

     Acquisition of alternate-source (non-petroleum) fuels in quantities for
vehicle testing was a major effort.  Contact with potential sources indicated
a lack of availability of several fuels which were originally intended for
test.  Apparently second-generation materials were available only in limited
quantities from laboratory-scale processes.  The term "second-generation"
refers to materials derived from alternate sources with some degree of after-
treatment.  Examples of aftertreatment are catalytic cracking, hydrogenation,
and so forth.  Cost for acquisition of these materials  was extremely high.
First-generation alternate-source materials were eventually found in quanti-
ties sufficient for testing.  "First-generation" refers to materials derived
from alternate sources with little or no aftertreatment.  It was felt that
reporting the effects of these available alternate-source fuels would be an
important first step in building a useful data base.  As second-generation
materials move from the laboratory to larger-volume production, similar
studies can be performed for comparison purposes.

     Two second-generation alternate-source materials were available in suf-
ficient quantities, largely due to previous interest and manufacture for U.S.
Navy studies.  These two materials were derived from a Paraho shale oil crude
refinery run, and were identified as Paraho JP-5 and Shale Diesel Marine.
Complete fuel characterization was a part of this study.  Properties of these
two fuels and the others tested in this study are listed in Table 4.  Fuel
chosen as the base fuel represented a "National Average" No. 2 diesel.

     First-generation materials available were coal-derived liquids from two
different refinery processes: Solvent Refined Coal  (SRC-II), and Exxon Donor
Solvent  (EDS).  Analysis of three liquids manufactured by these processes  are
located in Appendix B, page B-12.  Due to their poor ignition quality  (cetane
numbers <25), vehicle operation on the straight liquids was not possible.

-------
                                          TABLE  4.   FUEL PROPERTIES  AND COMPOSITION
Substance
Fuel Code (EM-
Cetane No. (D613)
Cetane Index (D976)
Gravity, "API @ 60°F
Density, g/ml @ 60°F
Carbon, wt. %
Hydrogen, wt. %
Nitrogen, ppm (oxid. pyrolysis)
Sulfur (lamp) , %
Calculated H/C, numeric
Carbon No. range (G.c.)
Aromatics , vol . %
Olefins, vol. % (D1319)
Paraffins, vol. %
Viscosity, cs @100 °F (D445)
Gum, mg/100 ml (D481)
Total solids, mg/2.
Metals in fuel, x-ray
Boiling Range, °C (IBP-EP, D86)
10% point
20% point
30% point
40% point
50% point
60% point
70% point
80% point
90% point
95% point
Residue, wt. % (D86)
Base
DP- 2
329-P
50
52
37.5
0.837
85.8
13.0
48
0.24
1.81
8-^24
21.3
1.7
77.0
2.36
14.3
7.4
Oa
191-340
219
231
242
251
260
269
278
290
307
323
1.3
Shale Diesel
Marine
453-F
49
56
37.9
0.835
86.3
13.4
5
<0.005
1.85
9-20
28.5
2.1
69.4
2.61
0.3
0.3
Oa
207-317
236
246
252
259
266
272
278
286
295
302
1.0
Paraho
JP-5
473-F
45
46
43.6
0.808
85.9
13.7
<1
0.005
1.90
10-15
22.0
2.0
76.0
1.38
1.4

0
179-248
189
192
196
198
202
206
211
218
228
237
1.5
Coal Case
5A
474 F
42
41
31.1
0.870
86.5
12.4
1600
0.10O
1.71
9-24
34.9
1.4
63.7
3.08
38.8

0
192-366
234
244
253
259
267
276
277
292
330
353
1.5
35%
SRC-II
475-F
31
29
28.2
0.886
86.2
11.8
3400
0.31
1.52
8-20
47.0
0.6
52.4
2.53
89. 7b
13.1
0
171-328
207
215
225
234
243
252
263
274
292
309
1.0
Broadcut
^id-Continent
476 F
35
52
44.1
0.806
86.1
13.2
1000
0.17
1.83
3-24
16.2
0.0
83.8
1.53
23.8

0
21-354
53
121
151
178
216
239
255
270
303
327
1.0
25%
SRC-II
478-F
38
38
31.7
0.867
86.4
12.3
2000
0.23
1.70
8-20
39.9
1.2
58.9
2.45
30.1
7.2
9ppm Fe
178-327
209
220
: 231
240
250
259
270
281
303
319
1.0
25%
EDS
482-F
44
42
33.8
0.856
86.5
12.7
267
0.16
1.75
8-20
36.4
0.0
63.6
2.37
60.0
3.1
0
179-353
207
218
227
239
251
263
276
293
316
336
1.5
25% EDS
Naphtha
485-F
45
47
38.3
0.833
86.3
13.3
142
0.28
1.84
7-20
25.5
0.5
74.0
1.76
13.1
1.2
0
108-334
157
182
203
223
238
254
267
281
302
319
1.5
 <10 ppm of
' Sample not

-------
                                 TABLE 4  (Cont'd).   FUEL  PROPERTIES  AND  COMPOSITION

Substance
Fuel Code (EM-
Boiling Range, °C (IBP-EP, D2887)
10% point
20% point
30% point
40% point
50% point
60% point
70% point
80% point
90% point
95% point
Residue, wt. % (D2887)
Composition, Volume %
Kerosene
Petroleum
Shale JP-5
Diesel
Petroleum
Shale DFM
Coal
Light Cycle Oil (petroleum)
LSR Naptha (petroleum)
HSR
	 Petroleum
Shale
Coal (Simulated)
N-Butane
Base
DF-2
329-F
104-387
197
220
239
256
268
280
292
307
330
347
0.0


0.0
0.0

100.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Shale Diesel
Marine
453-F
118-341
216
237
254
265
274
285
297
307
319
325
0.0


0.0
0.0

0.0
100.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Paraho
JP-5
473-F
157-286
175
187
195
201
210
216
224
234
244
254
0.0


0.0
100.0

0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Coal Case
5A
474-F
140-416
217
238
254
264
271
284
299
315
344
367
0.0


17.3
0.0

66.7
0.0
16.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
35%
SRC-II
475-F
103-346
158
178
196
207
219
229
240
255
278
295
0.0


0.0
0.0

65.0
0.0
35.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Broadcut
Mid-Continent
476-F
24-399
68
123
155
196
233
251
262
280
314
342
0.0


22.0
0.0

23.0
0.0
6.2
5.2
7.4
4.8
20.9
0.0
10.5
25%
SRC-II
478-F
129-508
193
214
232
243
259
271
285
302
321
345
0.0


0.0
0.0

75.0
0.0
25.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
25%
• EDS
482-F
128-419
192
210
228
243
257
273
289
305
332
356
0.0


0.0
0.0-

75.0
0.0
25.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
' 25% EDS
Naphtha
485-F
72-455
139
174
197
225
249
264
279
298
314
336
0.0


0.0
0.0

75.0
0.0
25.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
<10 ppm of Cr, Fe, Hi, Cu, Zn, and Mg; <70 ppm Pb; <100 ppm Al and Si

-------
Consequently, blends with the base fuel were formulated in order to permit
reasonable vehicle operation, and to compare emissions from fuels derived
from the two processes.   Properties of these blends are listed in Table 4.

     Selection of two other alternate-source materials made use of informa-
tion from another study(7'8)  which investigated regional refining models for
fuels.  This study demonstrated how syncrudes might be used to make specifi-
cation products in the year 1995.   Two fuel blends from the refining study
were chosen to represent combinations of shale oil, coal-derived, and petro-
leum liquids.  These two fuels were described as "Coal Case 5A",  and "Broadcut
Mid-Continent".  Properties of these blends are listed in Table 4.   It should
be noted that the petroleum portion of the two blends was not the base fuel,
EM-329-F.  The blends were previously prepared for use in the refining model
study, and were available in sufficient quantities for inclusion  in our work
following receipt of permission from the Department of Energy.
                                     12

-------
              IV.  INSTRUMENTATION AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
     Analytical procedures and equipment used to measure  regulated and unreg-
ulated emissions are described briefly  in .this section.   These procedures
were used in earlier EPA  contracts(2,3,5,6)f an<3 are  routinely used  in present-
day emission testing.

A.   Vehicle Operation and Smoke Measurements

     The VW Rabbit was operated to  simulate road experience on a 2-roll Model
ECE-50 Clayton light-duty chassis dynamometer, of the type qualified for
Federal light-duty certification.'^'  Inertia and power absorption settings
used for all test work on this dynamometer were set to simulate operation of
an earlier model VW Rabbit tested in a  previous study.     Discussion regarding
inertia and horsepower settings was given in Section  III. A. of this report.

     Care was taken to insure that  the  vehicle's fuel system was purged prop-
erly before testing of each  fuel.   All  test fuels were withdrawn from individual
19 liter cans.  Prior to  test, a 2  liter sample of test fuel was used to run
the vehicle, with the return line routed to a container subsequently discarded.
After this purge, the vehicle was operated for approximately 30 minutes, fol-
lowed by FTP and HFET driving cycles, to remove any residuals from other fuels,
and to insure that the vehicle fuel system contained only the fuel to be
tested.

     In order to test the Broadcut  fuel, EM-476-F, an additional electric fuel
pump was required at the  fuel container.  This pump was necessary because the
Broadcut had a high vapor pressure, due to the presence of 10.5 percent
n-butane.  Attempting to  withdraw this  fuel from the  can  using the engine's
fuel pump caused vaporization of the n-butane in the  fuel line.  The n-butane
"bubbles" caused very poor driveability and stalling.  The electric  fuel pump
was used to supply the fuel  under pressure rather than subjecting it to pres-
sures substantially below atmospheric.

     Exhaust smoke measurements were made using an optical light-extinction
smokemeter, of the type specified in Federal regulations  for heavy-duty diesel
engine smoke certification.^  '  The smokemeter was mounted on a 51  mm  (2 in.)
O.D. tailpipe extension when in use.  The control/readout unit for the smoke-
meter was mounted remote  from the vehicle under test, and continuous record-
ings of smoke opacity were made concurrently with vehicle speed traces.  Smoke
measurements were made over  the first 505 seconds of the  cold-start  FTP cycle,
while the vehicle was operated on the chassis dynamometer.  This procedure
was developed for research purposes on  an earlier EPA Contract, No.  68-03-2417
                                      13

-------
B.   Regulated and Unregulated Gaseous Emissions

     Regulated gaseous emissions of hydrocarbons  (HC), carbon monoxide  (CO),
and oxides of nitrogen (NOX) were collected and analyzed using procedures
and equipment described in the Federal Register.^'  The method of hydro-
carbon analysis was an updated version of that proposed, and eventually
adopted for the 1980 Federal Register. ^10^  The apparatus for hydrocarbon
analysis is shown schematically in Figure 1, and the  components are
described in Table 5.

     The unregulated gaseous emissions measured were aldehydes, phenols, and
odor.  Aldehydes were measured using the 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine  (DNPH)
method.^  The method consists of withdrawing a continuous sample of dilute
exhaust at a rate of 0.24 m3/hr, and bubbling the sample through glass im-
pingers, containing DNPH in hydrochloric acid.  This process forms the alde-
hydes' phenylhydrazone derivatives, which are eventually injected into a gas
chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector, for separation and
identification.

     Phenols were measured using the ether extraction procedure.^ '  The first
step was to collect dilute exhaust in impingers containing aqueous potassium
hydroxide, at a rate of 1.02 m-^/hr.  The contents of the impingers are acid-
ified and extracted with ethyl ether, and are eventually injected into a gas
chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector.

     Exhaust odor was evaluated using the A.D. Little "Diesel Odorant Analyt-
ical System" (DOAS).  The procedure used in this study was the same as used
in previous studies(5,11), and described in detail in the final report on
another study.'12)   The vehicle was operated at 3 steady-state modes, idle,
50 kph, and 85 kph.   Raw exhaust samples were taken for a specified time so
that the required amount of exhaust would pass through the Chromosorb 102
traps.  TIA (total intensity of aroma) values are defined by either:
                  TIA = 1 + Iog10 (LCD,  Ug/£)
                              or

                  TIA = 0.4 + 0.7 Iog10 (LCA, yg/fc),

whichever generates  the highest value.  "LCO" represents liquid column oxy-
genates,  and "LCA" represents liquid column aromatics.

C.   Particulate Collection, Mass Rate,  and Aerodynamic Sizing

     Particulate collection for this project was performed using a 457 mm
(18 inch)  diameter by 5 m (16 feet)  long dilution tunnel operating on total
vehicle exhaust.   Other associated equipment includes probes, pumps, and fil-
ter holders to withdraw and collect the particulate on filters, and a balance
to determine the mass of particulate collected.
                                     14

-------
            QC's
 Air Zero
HC Span 1
HC Span 2
HC Span 3
     Dilution
      Tunnel
    Heated  Probe
      (5/8"  SS)
                                                                       Denotes sample line components
                                                                       heated to 375°F
                                     VI
                            V8
                                                                          FL1
                                                          V9
                                                      Beckman  402 HFID OR
                                                SwRI  Build with  402 Detector
                                         FL2
FL3
                            Cal  gas
                            (not used)
                                                                                                               Vent
                                                                                                            V10
                                                                                                        Vent
                                                                                                    FID Fuel
                                                       FID Air
                                  Figure 1.
                     HFID
                   Detector
Heated hydrocarbon analyser system.

-------
  TABLE 5.  HEATED HYDROCARBON ANALYZER OVERFLOW CALIBRATION
        AND SAMPLE FLOW SCHEMATIC COMPONENT DESCRIPTION
Component

Valve
Valve
Valve
Valve
Valve
Valve
Valve
Valve
Valve
Valve
Designation

    VI
    V2
    V3
    V4
    V5
    V6
    V7
    V8
    V9
    V10
      Description of Function
regulating valve for zero air
regulating valve for HC span gas
regulating valve for bag sample
span/zero selector valve in HFID  (not  used)
sample backpressure regulator
FID fuel pressure regulator
FID air pressure regulator
HC span selector valve
HC span/zero/bag sample selector valve
leak check flow diverter valve
Restrictor
Restrictor
Restrictor
    Rl
    R2
    F3
sample capillary
FID fuel restrictor
FID air restrictor
Gage
Gage
Gage

Filter
Filter

Pump
Pump

Flowmeter
Flowmeter
Flowmeter
    Gl
    G2
    G3

    Fl-
    F2

    PI
    P2

    FL1
    FL2
    FL3
sample backpressure gage
FID fuel pressure gage
FID air pressure gage

heated 7.0 cm filter (probe)
heated 7.0 cm filter (oven)

bag sample pump
FID heated sample pump

overflow flowmeter
FID bypass flowmeter
leak check flowmeter
                              16

-------
     The dilution tunnel is similar to that used in a previous study^\ but
modified by installing an additional 114 mm  (4.5 inch) probe at the downstream
end of the tunnel.  This large probe was used to withdraw a dilute exhaust
sample at a rate of 3.4 m3/min  (120 SCFM) through a 500 x 500 mm  (20x20 inch)
Pallflex filter  (Pall Corporation).  The dilution tunnel used is shown schemat-
ically in Figure 2.  Some of the equipment necessary for collecting particulate
and relating it to undiluted vehicle emissions is not shown in the schematic.
It includes a constant volume sampler  (CVS) operating at a nominal capacity of
12.6 m3/min (450 CFM) to withdraw  and measure unsampled air/exhaust mixture,
and the positive-displacement pump  (capacity 3.4 m3/min) used for the 500 x 500
mm filter system.  The modified system was used initially in a study(3) just
prior to this one, with very satisfactory results.

     Figure 3 shows the vehicle in test configuration.  The dilution tunnel
and filter sampling probes protruding from the tunnel can also be seen in
Figure 3.  In the foreground, left side, the tunnel exit and the location of
the large probe  used  for the  "20x20" system  are visible.  Figure  4 shows the
"20x20"  filter holder  and  the  removal  of a particulate-laden filter  after
test.  Also visible  in Figure  4 is a close-up of the probe system used to
withdraw samples  through 47 mm  filters.

     Particle sizing was accomplished using a radial-slot impactor.  The im-
pactor system contained stainless  steel stages on which particulate matter
was supposedly fractionated by size, and a final Pallflex backup filter.
The impactor was located at the downstream end of the dilution tunnel.  Fig-
ure 5 shows the impactor system disassembled with the stages, plates, and
filter removed from their holder for clarity.  In operation, each stage was
placed on a plate such that the slots in each stage decreased in width from
sample entrance down to the filter.  Each stage was rotated 45 degrees so
the particulate matter passing through the slots impacted on a solid portion
of the following plate.  Particle  retention characteristics were related to
the slot size and flowrate through the impactor.  The flowrate was controlled
using a metal bellows vacuum pump, pressure gauge, and flowmeter.  The flow-
rate was maintained at 2.8 £/min  (0.1 CFM)  to achieve particle sizing down
to 0.1 micron.

     The mass of particulate matter collected on sample filters and impactor
discs was determined on a microbalance.  This balance is enclosed in a
vibration-resistant, temperature-  and humidity-controlled chamber to minimize
outside interferences.  Filters and other materials for weighing were allowed
to stabilize in the chamber for a minimum of 12 hours before they were
weighed.   The sensitivity of the balance is 1 yg.  Air to the chamber flows
at about 17 m3/hr on a one-pass basis, and keeps the chamber pressure at
about 2.5 kPa above atmospheric.  The control system keeps chamber conditions
at 22.2 ± 0.6°C and 63 ± 2 percent relative humidity, and air entering the
chamber is filtered through a 99.99 percent OOP-efficient filter.  Figure 6
shows  a technician weighing a 47 mm filter after test, using the weighing
chamber.
                                     17

-------
   T~

610mm
 (24in)
CO
     610mm
—  (24in)
                                  (16ft)-
                            840mm (33in)
                      1
450mm
(17.7in)
                 DILUTION AIR
              FILTER ENCLOSURE
          76mm (Sin) RAW 	
     EXHAUST TRANSFER TUBE
                    230mm (Sin)
                  MIXING ORIFICE
                      J
                                                                         TO CVS
                                                                         114mm
                                                                         (4-1/2in)DIA
                                                                             I
                                r
                                                         700mm (27.5in)—
                                                     SAMPLE
                                                              AIR+
                                                              EXH.
                                                                 u
                                                   r
                     4EA1/2inlD
                  SAMPLING PROBE
                                        114mm
                                        (4-1/2in)DIA
                                                      500 x 500mm
                                                      (20in x 20in)
                                                      FILTER HOLDER
                     Figure 2. Schematic diagram of exhaust dilution tunnel.

-------
     Figure 3.  Volkswagen Rabbit during test.
Figure 4.  Unloading of 20x20 filter from holder.
                        19

-------
              Figure 5.   Particle  sizing  impactor, disassembled.
Figure 6.  Filter weighing in a temperature- and humidity-controlled chamber.
                                     20

-------
D.   Analysis of Particulate Composition

     Particulate samples were acquired by several methods for various analyses.
After determining particulate matter weights, the samples were subjected to
analysis for major elements and trace elements.  Some particulate samples were
collected in order to obtain the soluble fraction of particulate matter.  Anal-
ysis of the soluble fraction is discussed in the next section.

     1-.   Trace Elements

          Analysis for trace elements  (metals and sulfur) in the particulate
matter was performed on 47 mm Fluoropore filter samples.  As provided in the
contract agreement, these determinations were made at EPA's Research Triangle
Park laboratories as part of the EPA in-house measurement program.  The in-
strumentation used for these analyses was a Siemens MRS-3 x-ray fluorescence
spectrometer.

     2.   Major Elements

          Samples collected on 47 mm glass fiber filters were sent to Galbraith
Laboratories and analyzed for carbon and hydrogen content by combustion and
subsequent gas analysis.  The equipment used was a Perkin-Elmer Model 240B
automated thermal conductivity CHN analyzer.  Results of this analysis was
reported in percent of submitted mass and weight of element detected on the
filter.  These results make the filter weighing accuracy very important.
                                                      L
E.   Analysis of the Soluble Fraction of Particulate Matter

     The soluble fraction of particulate matter was obtained by extraction
from the 500 x 500 mm  (20x20 inch) Pallflex filters.  This large filter enabled
enough soluble material to be extracted so that the total amount could be
divided into smaller aliquots, then analyzed for a variety of constituents.

     1.   Total Soluble Organics

          The 500 x 500 mm filters were weighed before and after test to
determine the weight of particulate matter.  Each filter was extracted using
methylene chloride in a Soxhlet apparatus.  The solvent volume was reduced at
low temperature and under vacuum.  The remaining solvent/solubles were trans-
ferred to a preweighed container, and the solvent was evaporated by nitrogen
purging.  The total mass of solubles was determined gravimetrically, and the
percent of solubles in the particulate matter calculated.

     2.   Major Elements

          One aliquot of the dried, weighed soluble extract was submitted to
Galbraith Laboratories and analyzed for carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and sulfur
                                     21

-------
by the technique and instrumentation described in Section IV, D.2 (Perkin-
Elmer 240B).  An additional aliquot of soluble extract was submitted to SwRI's
Mobile Energy Division for nitrogen analysis by oxidative pyrolysis and
chemiluminescence.

     3.   Solubles Boiling Range and Individual n-Paraffin Analysis

          Another aliquot of soluble extract was submitted to SwRI's Mobile
Energy Division for determination of the boiling range and reference to nor-
mal paraffins.  The procedure is a high-temperature variation of ASTM D2887-73.
Each aliquot was dissolved in carbon disulfide, and an internal standard (Cg
and GH compound) was added for quantitative results.  The maximum temperature
that this column reached was 450°C, eluting compounds boiling up to 650°C.

     4.   Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP)  and Ames Bioassay

          An additional 500 x 500 mm (20x20 inch)  filter was extracted, and
the extract was divided into eleven aliquots.  One aliquot was used to deter-
mine the BaP content of the soluble extract.  This analysis was performed by
SwRI's Department of Emissions  Research.  The procedure, developed by others^13;
is based on high-performance liquid chromatography to separate BaP from other
organic solubles in particulate matter; and it incorporated fluorescence
detection to measure BaP.  The  instrument used was a Perkin-Elmer 3B liquid
chromatograph equipped with a MPF-44 fluorescence spectrophotometer.  Excita-
tion was at a wavelength of 383 nm, and emission was read at 430 nm.  The
remaining ten aliquots were shipped on dry ice to EG&G for Ames bioassay
testing.  The Ames test refers  to a bacterial mutagenesis plate assay with
Salmonella typhimurium, according to the method of Ames. I**'

     5.   Fractionation by Relative Polarity

          The composition of the organic soluble portion of the particulate
matter is complex, and its separation into individual compounds is very dif-
ficult.  Fractionation of the solubles by high performance liquid chromatog-
raphy (HPLC)  separates the sample into a series of fractions of increasing
molecular polarity.  This procedure is discussed in detail in a CRC report.
Briefly, an organic solubles sample is initially carried in a solvent com-
posed of 95 percent hexane and  5 percent methylene chloride, a relatively
non-polar mixture.  After a period of time, the ratio of methylene chloride
to hexane, and therefore solvent polarity, is increased at a rate of 5 percent
methylene chloride per minute.   At 100 percent methylene chloride, the carrier
solvent is moderately polar. A fluorescence detector is used at an excitation
wavelength of 303 nm and an emission wavelength of 418 nm.  A UV detector is
used at wavelength of 254 nm.  At these wavelengths fluorescence and UV
responses of compounds are mapped as a function of column elution time,
reflecting polarity.
                                     22

-------
                   V.  TEST PLANS AND OPERATING SCHEDULE
     The following sections describe  the test plan, sequences, and schedule.
A summary of the exhaust constituents evaluated is summarized in Table 6.
Test efficiency was achieved by grouping similar sample collection techniques
together, to minimize vehicle running time.  Discussion of the analysis
techniques are presented in Section IV of this report.

     The vehicle followed two transient cycles, FTP and HFET, during most
sample collection and measurement runs.  These cycles are routinely used in
emission testing and are well documented in other works.d'3,6,11)   Smoke
evaluation was performed separately during the cold transient portion of the
FTP  (first 505 seconds).  The cold transient portion incorporates all of the
most interesting modes  from a smoke standpoint, including cold engine start,
first idle, first acceleration, second idle, and second acceleration.  Steady-
state modes at idle, 50 kph, and 85 kph were used to obtain raw exhaust sam-
ples for odor analysis.  Vehicle running time on the steady-state modes was
governed by the sample volume requirements of the odor measurement procedure
(DOAS).

     The test plan incorporating the cycles and evaluations for each test
fuel is given in Table  7.  Samples taken over each 2-bag FTP were defined as
a "cold FTP" or a "hot FTP."  Testing for each fuel required a minimum of
three days.  After the  first day of testing, as many of the results as pos-
sible were reviewed to determine whether or not replicate analysis would be
required on the second day of testing.  It was important to determine the
validity of the tests as early as possible, to avoid costly reruns and de-
pletion of limited test fuel quantities by repurging the fuel system.  Pro-
cedure for fuel system purging between test fuels is discussed in Section IV.
Duplicate filter samples were collected on Day 2, and retained for possible
replicate analyses.  In some cases, samples were stored in their most stable
form, then submitted for analysis as a group (rather than individually) to
minimize the effects of day-to-day variability in an analytical procedure.

     Utilizing this test plan on nine test fuels yielded a total of 30 runs,
including baseline repeats and additional runs to support unexpected results.
At the Project Officer's request, several initial tests were performed to
determine lab-to-lab correlation of test results on the vehicle.  Also, some
testing was requested to determine whether or not the vehicle used in the
study could be run to simulate an earlier model used in another study.  These
efforts are discussed in Section III, Part A.
                                     23

-------
                  TABLE 6.  OUTLINE OF CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL EXHAUST EVALUATIONS
Exhaust component
   under study
Constituent(s) analyzed for
   Collection
     Method
  Analysis technique(s)
Smoke
smoke (visible)
                    EPA smokemeter (continuous)
gases
HC, CO, CO2/ NOX
aldehydes
odor
phenols
sample bag
wet impinger
DOAS traps
wet impinger
constant volume sampler
DNPH
DOAS analyzer
extraction, GC
particulate
total mass
size distribution
sulfur & trace elements

carbon, hydrogen in
 particulate

organic extractable substances
BaP in organic solubles
molecular weight range of
 organic solubles
carbon, hydrogen in solubles
biologidfel response of
 solubles
polarity profile of solubles
Pallflex filters
impactor-filter
filter, 47 mm
 Fluoropore
filter, 47 mm
 glass fiber

"20x20" filter
gravimetric
gravimetric

x-ray fluorescence

combustion  (commercial)

soxhlet extraction
LC, fluorescence detection

GC
combustion  (commercial)

Ames bioassay
HPLC

-------
                                        TABLE 7.  TEST PLAN FOR EACH FUEL
Analysis or Sample
gaseous HC, CO, NOX, CO2
sulfur & trace metals
particle size distribution
organic extractables
total particulate mass
C & H in particulate
odor
aldehydes
phenols
BaP and Ames bioassay
smoke
Day 1
Cold FTP
X
X
X
X
X
-
-
-
-
-
Hot FTP
X
X
,b
X
X
X
-
-
-
-
-
HFET
X
X
X
X
X
-
-
-
-
-
Day 2a
Idle
X
-
X
-
X
-
-
-
-
50 kph
X
-
X
-
X
-
-
-
-
85 kph
X
-
X
-
X
-
-
-
-
Cold FTP
X
-
X
-
X
X
X
X
-
Hot FTP
X
-
X
-
X
X
X
X
-
HFET
X
-
X
-
-
X
X
X
-
Day 3
cold transient
(505 seconds)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
X
KJ
(Jl
       Repeat samples optional
       One sample collected for entire 4-bag FTP
      COrganic extractables divided into aliquots for HPLC, carbon & yydrogen, and boiling
        range analyses

-------
                  VI.  GASEOUS EMISSION AND ODOR RESULTS
     This report section includes presentation and discussion of results on
regulated gaseous emissions, aldehydes, phenols, and exhaust odor.  Data on
regulated gaseous emissions, including CO2 and fuel consumption, were obtained
by analysis of bag samples collected from the CVS-diluted exhaust.  In most
cases, confidence limits could not be calculated due to an insufficient num-
ber of data points.  For a few emissions, sufficient replicate tests were
performed on base fuel only to allow computation of confidence limits.  Where
applicable, these limits are shown as the standard error bar on the graphical
presentations.  Emissions repeatability was good in most cases, -with replicate
results on the same fuel deviating 5 percent or less from results of the first
run.  When emissions differed by more than about 5 percent between runs on
different fuels, the emissions variation was considered likely to be a result
of fuel property variation.

A.   Regulated Gaseous Emission Results

     Data on regulated gaseous emissions, including CO2 and fuel consumption,
were obtained by analysis of bag samples collected from the CVS-diluted exhaust.
These results are summarized in Tables 8 and 9.  The results are reported for
each individual bag, a calculated 3-bag FTP, and a calculated 4-bag FTP.  The
computer printouts for each test are located in Appendix C, pages C-2 through
C-71.

     Vehicle performance using fuel blend EM-475-F, base fuel and 35 percent
SRC-II, was marginal.  A complete FTP was not possible due to the high level
of emissions, causing sample system plugging.  The only results obtainable
were for the first 505 seconds of a cold-start FTP.  The gaseous emissions,
as shown in Table 7, indicate significant increases in HC, CO, NOX, and fuel
consumption.  Probable cause for these increases was the inability of the
engine to produce normal power at normal rack settings on this low cetane
number (31) fuel.  Use of EM-475-F required more rack opening to operate the
vehicle over the FTP driving schedule.  This increase in rack position, and
consequent larger volume of fuel injected, is confirmed by the increase in
fuel consumption noted.  With overall richer off-design engine operation, an
increase in emissions was expected.

     The "3-bag" composite values for HC, CO, NOX from Table 8 are shown as
a bar graph in Figure 7.  The greatest hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide in-
creases,  as compared to the base fuel, were observed with the Broadcut and
the 25% SRC-II blend.  Hydrocarbon emissions with these two fuels more than
doubled as compared to the base fuel.  An earlier study ^ ', using a similar
vehicle operating on various petroleum-based fuels, reported increases in HC
                                     27

-------
TABLE 8.  AVERAGE  REGULATED GASEOUS EMISSIONS DATA DURING FTP

Fuel

Base
DF-2

EM-329-F


Shale Diesel
Fuel-Marine

EM-453-F


Paraho JP-5


EM-473-F


Coal Case
5A

EM-474-F


Broadcut


EM-476-F


35% SRC-II


EM-475-F


25% SRC-II


EM-478-F


25% EDS


EM-4B2-F


25% EDS
Naphtha

EM-485-F



Item


HC
CO
C02
NO,
Fuel

HC
CO
C02
NOx
Fuel

HC
CO
C02
NOX
Fuel

HC
CO
C02
NOX
Fuel

HC
CO
C02
NOX
Fuel

HC
CO
C02
NOX
Fuel

HC
CO
C02
NOx
Fuel

HC
CO
C°2
NO
Fuel

HC
CO
CO
NO
Fuel
Emissions (q/km) and Fuel Usaqe (i/100 km)
FTP Bag Number
1

0.40
1.23
179.
0.67
6.94

0.42
1.33
187.
0.68
7.31

0.48
1.41
182.
0.71
7.30

0.51
1.49
187.
0.84
6.92

1.04
1.58
181.
0.65
7.36

3.52
3.05
222.6
0.98
8.52

1.18
1.48
191.
0.78
7.17

0.48
1.50
181.3
0.72
6.83

0.41
1.37
190.9
0.76
7.38
2

0.26
0.82
164, •
0.67
6.33

0.26
0.88
167.
0.67
6.49

0.28
1.04
163.
0.69
6.53

0.30
1.00
166.
0.85
6.11

0.55
1.35
162.
0.67
6.51

—
—
	
—
—

0.47
1.29
171.
0.76
6.36

0.26
0.94
159.9
0.74
5.98

0.29
1.05
167.8
0.78
6.47
3

0.33
1.03
156.
0.64
5.95

0.34
1.17
163.
0.67
6.37

0.49
1.33
156.
0.68
6.30

0.46
1.39
160.
0.79
5.94

0.65
1.27
158.
0.60
6.36

—
—
	
	
—

0.41
1.22
163.
0.73
6.08

0.35
1.26
154.6
0.71
5.81

0.39
1.23
160.4
0.71
6.21
4

0.25
0.80
163.
0.66
6.32

0.27
0.84
164.
0.68
6.37

0.29
1.00
158.
0.69
6.32

0.32
1.03
157.
0.83
5.78

0.61
1.36
157.
0.64
6.34

—
—
	
	
—

0.42
1.26
159.
0.75
5.. 93

0.25
0.95
153.6
0.73
5.74

0.25
0.96
159.8
0.75
6.15
3-baq
FTP

0.31
0.96
165.
0.66
6.37

0.31
1.06
171.
0.67
6.63

0.38
1.20
165.
0.70
6.62

0.39
1.21
169.
0.83
6.23

0.68
1.38
164.
0.65
6.64

__
	
	
	
—

0.60
1.31
173.
0.76
&.4S

0.33
1.14
162.8
0.73
6.11

0.34
1.16
170.6
0.76
6.59
4-bag
prppa

0.31
0.95
165.
0.66
6.36

0.32
1.04
170.
0.68
6.59

0.38
1.19
165.
0.69
6.56

0.39
1.22
166.
0.82
6.13

0.70
1.38
163.
0.64
6.59

—
__
	
__
—

0.59
1.30
170.
0.7
6. 33

0.32
1.14
161.0
0.73
6.04

0.33
1.14
168.2
0.75
6.49
    Calculated
                              28

-------
TABLE 9.
AVERAGE RESULTED GASEOUS EMISSIONS  DATA DURING HFET AND  STEADY-STATE

Fuel

Base
DP- 2

EH-329-F


Shale Diesel
Fuel-Marine

EM-453-F


Paraho JP-5


EM-473-F


Coal Case
5A

EM-474-F


Broadcut


EM-476-F


35% SRC-II


EM-475-F


25% SRC-II


EM-478-F


25* EDS



EM-482-F

25* EDS
Naphtha


EM-485-F


Item


HC
CO
CO2
NOX
Fuel

HC
CO
CO2
NOX
Fuel

HC
CO
C02
NOx
Fuel

HC
CO
C02
NOX
Fuel

HC
CO
C02
NOX
Fuel

HC
CO
C02
NOx
Fuel

HC
CO
C02
NOX
Fuel

HC
CO
CO
2
NO
Fuel

HC
CO
CO,
NO2
Fuel
Emissions (g/tan) and Fuel Usage (H/100 km)

HFET

0.35
1.04
133.
0.61
5.17

0.37
1.20
146.
0.67
5.66

0.79
1.60
139.
0.66
5.71

0.46
1.41
145.
0.84
5.38

0.61
1.18
138.
0.58
5.57

	
	
—
—
—

0,28
0.92
142.
0.76
5.25

0.34
1.12
136.1
0.71
5.12

—
—
—
—
—
Steady-State
Idlea

2.13
9.30
1136.
5.78
0.44

2.94
9.45
1169.
6.09
0.45

2.10
11.3
1067.
6.90
0.43

7.23
22.1
1176.
6.18
0.45

11.0
24.5
1117.
5.67
0.47

	
	
—
—
—

11.6
26.4
1097.
0.75
0.43

6.60
18.09
1097.
5.79
0.42

—
—
—
—
—
50 kph

0.17
0.54
124.
0.53
4.77

0.24
0.70
123.
0.54
4.73

0.09
0.39
107.
0.51
4.25

0.45
0.51
108.
0.42
3.99

0.20
0.47
106.
0.41
4.21

—
	
—
—
—

0.64
0.56
118.
0.45
4.39

0.17
0.37
103.0
0.43
3.84

—
—
--
—

85 kph

0.39
1.20
134.
0.67
5.22

0.40
1.35
142.
0.69
5.49

0.61
1.81
142.
0.72
5.79

0.63
1.79
148.
0.92
5.55

0.71
1.29
135.
0.61
5.49

__
	
__
	
—

0.25
0.83
144.
0.84
5.34

0.31
1.11
136.5
0.82
5.13

—
—
—
—

              Mission in g/h instead of g/km, fuel in l/ti instead of I/] 00 km
                                           29

-------
           HC=I
   1.25
I
             = 95%  conf.
                limit
                                                    Broadcut
               Shale
               Diesel
               Marine
                           Paraho
                            JP-5
   1.00
fi
o
•H
[fi
IT;
Base
DF-2
       i
   0.50
   0.25
           In
                            Figure  7.   Regulated gaseous emissions during FTP (composite)

-------
and CO emissions of up to 4 times the base  fuel level.  The cetane numbers
of the two fuels in that study were 49 and  42.  The cetane number spread
between the fuels in this study was greater (50 to 35 and 38), but smaller
HC increases were noted.  Probable cause for  the Broadcut fuel's low cetane
number was the presence of low molecular weight paraffins, while the 25%
SRC-II fuel's low cetane was probably attributable to its rather high aromatic
content.

     All the test fuels resulted in higher  NOX emissions than the base fuel.
Use of the Coal Case 5A material resulted in  higher NOX emissions than the
other blends.  Another study(3) resulted in developing prediction equations
for several emissions as a function of fuel properties.  NOX emissions were
associated with fuel aromatic and nitrogen  content.  The Coal Case 5A fuel
contained high aromatics and nitrogen.  The prediction equations themselves
could not be used per se, as they contain a constant term which is applicable
to the specific vehicle/engine tested (Mercedes-Benz 240D).  A similar statis-
tical analysis incorporating the wide variance in fuel properties of this
study could yield similar prediction equations.  Comparing the two middle-
distillate coal-derived fuel blends, 25% SRC-II and 25% EDS, the SRC-II blend
was associated with high emissions.  The 25% middle-distillate and the 25%
EDS naphtha gave almost identical HC, CO and NOX emissions.

     Figure 8 shows HFET results in bar graph form similar to Figure 7.  The
25% EDS naphtha was not run on the HFET.  It was only used on a limited basis
for very few tests.  Complete evaluation of the 25% EDS naphtha may occur in
another study if preliminary results generated during this study are of suf-
ficient interest.  Paraho JP-5 was associated with more substantial HC and
CO increases on the HFET, as compared with  the base fuel, than was the case
for the FTP.  Coal Case 5A increased HFET NOX over baseline more than the
other blends, and it also increased CO about  40 percent.  It is interesting
to note that the 25% EDS blend gave slightly higher HC and CO (NOX about the
same) as compared with the 25% SRC-II.  Similar comparison between these two
blends during the FTP indicated the opposite  trend.

     Fuel consumptions for the test fuels during both transient cycles are
shown graphically in Figure 9.  During both cycles, all the test blends showed
slightly increased fuel consumption except  Coal Case 5A and 25% EDS.  The 25%
EDS appears to result in the same or slightly lower fuel consumption as com-
pared with the base fuel.  Coal Case 5A showed increased fuel consumption over
the base fuel during the HFET, but was about the same during the FTP.  FTP and
HFET results  indicate that the 25% EDS blend was associated with between 5
(FTP) and 12 (HFET) percent less fuel consumed as compared with the 25% SRC-II
blend.

B.   Aldehyde and Phenol Results

     Concentrations of a number of individual low-molecular weight aldehydes
were determined in CVS-diluted exhaust.   The results for each aldehyde species
                                      31

-------
w
to
   1.50
   1.25
   1.00
tn
to
c
o
•rH
to
|  0.75
   0.50
   0.25
                                 Shale

                                 Diesel

                                 Marine
                                  Figure  S.   Regulated gaseous emissions  during HFET.

-------
CO

Ul
       7.0
    e  6.5
    o
    o
    -2  6.0
    -p
    W
    a
    o
    o
    S  5.5
       5.0
                 A
           ^^

          r

                                                                         A
 A =  Base  DF-2

 B =  Shale Diesel Marine

 C =  Paraho JP-5

 D =  Coal  Case 5A

 E =  Broadcut

 F =  25% SRC-II

 G =  25% EDS

 H =  25% EDS Naphtha


T=  95% conf. limits
                                   FTP                                                    HFET


                                        Figure  9.  Fuel consumption during FTP and HFET

-------
and their sums during the FTP are presented in Table 10.  "Total" aldehydes
refers to the sum of the aldehydes determined using the procedure discussed
in Section IV.  This "total" for each of the test fuels is shown graphically
in Figure 10.  Table 11 contains the phenol results during the FTP and the
"total" phenols are also shown graphically in Figure 10.

      "Total" aldehyde emission decreases, as compared with the base, were
observed with the 25% SRC-II and the 25% EDS blends.  Both blends gave sim-
ilar  aldehyde emissions (~3 mg/km).  No aldehyde increases over the base were
seen  with the fuels tested during the FTP.  Paraho JP-5 and Broadcut test
fuel  were associated with decreases in FTP phenol emissions as compared to
base  fuel.  The 25% EDS blend doubled the base fuel's phenol emissions during
the FTP.  It is interesting to note that although the aldehyde emission rates
for the 25% SRC-II and 25% EDS blend were approximately the same, the 25%
SRC-II blend did not increase phenols as did the 25% EDS blend.

      Aldehyde and phenol results during the HFET are listed in Table 12.
Their "total" values are shown as a bar graph in Figure 11.  As seen in the
FTP results, no "total" aldehyde increases were observed when compared to the
base  fuel's results. Again, aldehyde decreases were seen with the 25% SRC-II
and 25% EDS blends.  Phenol decreases during the HFET were associated with
the Paraho JP-5 and the Broadcut test blend (same trend as FTP).  The 25%
SRC-II blend, however, increased phenols to over 14 times the base fuel level
during the HFET.  The same blend did not affect phenols during the FTP.  A
similar situation occurred with the 25% EDS phenol results.  No change was
observed during the HFET,  but an increase was seen during the FTP.  Coal Case
5A more than doubled the base fuel's phenol emissions during the HFET.

C.    Results of Odor Analysis

      This subsection contains results from instrumental odor evaluations
(DOAS).   The chromatographic procedure separates an oxygenate fraction
(liquid column oxygenates, LCO)  and an aromatic fraction (liquid column
aromatics, LCA).  Studiesd2'16)  have been made in an attempt to correlate
instrumental analysis to a panel of trained human evaluators.  One study
indicated that TIA (LCO-based)  of less than 1.0 would be rated by a trained
panel at less than "D"-l.   A perceived odor intensity of "D"-l by the Turk
method is considered a light (barely perceptible) odor.  It should be noted
that since the TIA (total  intensity of aroma)  is calculated using a logarithmic
equation, each increase of one unit in the TIA value relates to a concentra-
tion increase by a factor  of ten.

     Results of the odor analysis are listed in Table 13.  The TIA values
(LCO-based)  are shown graphically in Figure 12.  During idle operation, the
Broadcut and 25% SRC-II blends increased odor as compared to the base.  A
slight reduction was observed with the Paraho JP-5.  At the 50 kph cruise
condition, the Coal Case 5A was associated with the highest odor levels as
                                     34

-------
                                         TABLE 10.  FTP ALDEHYDE EMISSIONS  DATA



Operating
Schedule
Cold FTP





Hot FTP





Calculated
1981 FTP









Compound ( s ) mg/km
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone3
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
"Total"
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetonea
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
"Total"

Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetonea
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
"Total"
Fuel Description and Code (EM-XXX-F)

Base
DF-2
329
7.
2.
2.
0.0
0.0
11.
10.
2.
3.
0.0
0.0
15.

9.
2.
3.
0.0
0.0
14.
Shale
Diesel
Marine
453
7.
1.
0.0
0.0
2.
10.
6.
1.
0.0
0.0
2.
9.

6.
1.
0.0
0.0
2.
9.

Paraho
JP-5
473
8.
2.
0.0
0.0
8.
18.
6.
3.
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.

7.
3.
0.0
0.0
3.
13.
Coal
Case
5A
474
4.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.
7.
3.
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.

6.
2.
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.

Broad-
cut
476
14.
0.7
0.0
0.0
3.
18.
6.
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.
9.

9.
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.
12.

25%
SRC-II
478
3.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.
2.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.

2.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.

25%
EDS
482
5.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
1.
1.

2.
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.6
3.
OJ
tn
           Included acrolein and propanol

-------
U)
     en
05
C
o
•iH
05
Cfi
-H

w
        25
        20
        15
        10
            "Total"

          Aldehydes


            "Total"

            Phenols
                 Base DF-2
                        Figure 10.  "Total"  aldehyde and phenol emissions during FTP.

-------
                              TABLE 11. FTP PHENOL EMISSIONS  DATA



Operating
Schedule
Cold FTP







Hot FTP







Calculated
1981 FTP











Compound ( s ) rag/km
Phenol
Salicylaldehyde
m-Cresol + p-Cresol
Group 5a
2,3, 5-trimethylphenol
2,3,5, 6-tetramethylphenol
2-n-propylphenol
"Total"
Phenol
Salicylaldehyde
m-Cresol + p-Cresol
Group 5a
2,3, 5-trimethylphenol
2,3,5, 6-tetramethylphenol
2-n-propylphenol
"Total"

Phenol
Salicylaldehyde
m-Cresol + p-Cresol
Group 5a
2,3, 5-trimethylphenol
2,3,5, 6-tetramethylphenol
2-n-propylphenol
"Total"
Fuel Descrij

Base
DF-2
329
0.0
0.0
1.
4.
0.4
0.3
7.
13.
0.0
0.0
0.1
2.
0.1
0.2
8.
10.

0.0
0.0
0.7
3.
0.3
0.3
8.
12.
Shale
Diesel
Marine
453
0.0
0.0
3.
0.0
0.0
0.0
8.
11.
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.
11.

0.0
0.0
2.
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.
11.

Paraho
JP-5
473
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.5

0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.5
3tion and Code (EM-XXX-F)
Coal
Case
5A
474
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
000
16.
17.
0.0
0.0
2.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
9.8
12.

0.0
0.0
1.4
0.2
0.0
0.0
12.5
14.

Broad-
cut
476
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
5.
0.0
6.
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
2.
0.0
2.

25%
SRC-II
478
0.0
3.
1.
0.2
0.4
14.
0.0
19.
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
7.
0.0
8.

0.0
1.
1.
0.1
0.2
10.
0.0
12.

25%
EDS
482
0.9
1.
1.
1.
0.6
5.
0.0
10.
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.4
0.6
33.
0.0
34.

0.4
0.4
0.7
0.7
0.6
21.
0.0
24.
Group 5 consists of p-ethylphenol, 2-isopropylphenol, 2,3-xylenol, 3,5-xylenol, 2,4,6-trimethylphenol

-------
                            TABLE 12.   HFET PHENOL AND ALDEHYDE EMISSION DATA


Compounds

Phenols, mg/km
Phenol
Salicylaldehyde
m-Cresol +p-Cresol
Group 5a
2,3, 5-trimethylphenol
2,3,5, 6-tetramethylphenol
2-n-propylphenol
"Total"
Aldehydes, mg/km
Formaldehyde
Acetaldehyde
Acetone-'-1
Hexanaldehyde
Benzaldehyde
"Total"
Fuel Description and Code (EM-XXX-F)

Base
DF-2
329

0.0
0.0
1.
2.
0.03
0.6
4.
8.

9.
1.
5.
0.0
, 0.0
15.
Shale
Diesel
Marine
453

0.0
0.0
0.2
0.5
0.0
0.0
8.
9.

8.
0.0
3.
0.0
2.
13.

Paraho
JP-5
473

0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.
1.

6.
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.
13.
Coal
Case
5A
474

2.
0.0
0.5
0.9
0.0
0.0
14.
17.

6.
1.
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.

Broad-
cut
476

0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.2

11.
3.
0.0
0.0
2.
16.

25%
SRC-II
478

0.0
210.
0.0
0.4
0.0
4.
0.0
214.

0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

25%
EDS
482

1.
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.3
8.
0.0
10.

1.
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.
3.
CD
     Group  5  consists  of  p-ethylphenol,  2-isopropylphenol,  2,3-xylenol, 3,5-xylenol, 2,4,6-trimethylphenol
     Included acrolein and propanol

-------
E
,y

tn
E

(ft
c
o
•H
CO
CO
-H
      Shale

      Diesel

      Marine
Figure 11.   "Total"  aldehyde and phenol emissions  during HFET.

-------
TABLE 13.  RESULTS OF ODOR ANALYSIS AT STEADY-STATES

Date
12-12-80


1-19-81


5-6-81


5-19-81


5-27-81


7-17-81


8-3-81



Fuel Code
EM-329-F


EM-453-F


EM-473-F


EM-474-F


EM-476-F


EM-478-F


EM-482-F



Fuel Type
Base DF-2


Shale
Diesel
Marine
Paraho
JP-5

Coal Case
5A

Broadcut


25% SRC-II


25% EDS



Condition
Idle
50 kph
85 kph
Idle
50 kph
85 kph
Idle
50 kph
85 kph
Idle
50 kph
85 kph
Idle
50 kph
85 kph
Idle
50 kph
85 kph
Idle
50 kph
85 kph

LCA, yg/1
55.
110.
400.
7.5
23.
60.
9.6
35.
5600
27.
76.
160.
297.
220.
592.
143.
17.
14.
78.
360.
129.

LCO,yg/l
3.7
7.5
21.
4.4
12.
15.
1.4
3.1
23.
6.3
25.
67.
13.
12.
53.
13.
3.5
3.2
6.5
16.
24.
TIA
LCA
1.6
1.8
2.2
1.0
1.4
1.6
1.1
1.5
2.3
1.4
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.0
2.3
1.9
1.3
1.2
1.5
1.7
1.5
LCO
1.6
1.9
2.3
1.6
2.1
2.2
1.1
1.5
2.4
1.8
2.4
2.8
2.1
2.1
2.7
2.1
1.1
1.1
1.8
1.2
2.4
                         40

-------
        Idle




        50  kph =  g^l




        85  kph =
0)
W
(0
A

O
o
M
0
O
Base DF-2
                                                        Coal  Case

                                                           5A
                                                                      Broadcut
                                                                                        25%  EDS
                                  Figure 12,  Odor analysis at three steady-states.

-------
compared with the base.   The 85 kph cruise results show that the Coal Case 5A
and the Broadcut were associated with the highest odor levels.  Lowest odor
level was observed with  the 25% SRC-II blend.   In summary, the Broadcut and
Coal Case 5A test fuels  generally exhibited the highest odor levels during
the three steady-state modes.   Only at idle did the 25% SRC-II and 25% EDS
test fuels'  odor levels  exceed the base fuel's.  Shale diesel marine gave
results similar to base  fuel during the three  steady-states.
                                    42

-------
               VII.   SMOKE AND PARTICULATE  EMISSION  RESULTS
     This section of the  report presents  summary  data  and  discussion on vis-
ible smoke, total particulate mass  emissions, particle size  distribution, and
particulate matter elemental analysis.  In addition, it includes information
on organic solubles in particulate  matter, elemental analysis of the solubles,
BaP in solubles, boiling  range of organic solubles by  gas  chromatograph anal-
ysis, polarity profile of the solubles, and bioassay analysis.

A.   Visible Smoke Emissions

     Visible smoke was measured using an EPA-type smokemeter over the first
505 seconds  (the "cold transient phase") of the FTP.   Data,  taken on a 2-pen
strip chart recorder, consisted of  vehicle speed  and smoke opacity versus
time.  The traces, which  were analyzed manually,  are located in Appendix D,
Pages D-2 through D-9.  The results are summarized in  Table  14.

                  TABLE 14.  SUMMARY OF VISIBLE SMOKE  DATA
Condition
Cold Start peak
Cold idle, avg.
(after start)
1st accel. peak
Idle at 125 sees,
avg.
Accel, at 164 sees,
peak
Smoke Opacity, %, by fuel, EM-XXX-F
329
21.2
0.2
28.2
0.7
37.5
453
46.8
1.0
44.2
0.5
27.2
473
36.0
1.4
61.5
0.8
20.0
474
66.0
0.4
40.5
0.6
71.2
476
33.0
3.0
44.2
0.5
20.6
475
66.0
60.0
92.0
21.0
59.0
478
58.8
3.5
63.5
1.0
42.0
482
58.2
4.0
67.8
1.7
41. 3
     These data indicate rather dramatic smoke effects when running EM-475-F,
the 35% SRC-II blend.  Its smoke levels were very high at the start and even
at the 125 second idle, by which time all the other fuels show very little
smoke production at idle.  Base fuel EM-329-F generally exhibited the lowest
smoke levels.  At the 164 second acceleration, however, several fuels did
give lower smoke readings than the base fuel.  Shale diesel marine  (453),
Paraho JP-5  (473), and the Broadcut  (476) all showed reduced smoke at the
                                      43

-------
164 second acceleration.   With the exception of the 35% SRC-II, the greatest
smoke level increases were generally associated with the other test fuels
containing cokl-derived liquids;  Coal Case 5A (474), 25% SRC-II (478), and
25% EDS (482)1  Smoke levels for the two blends containing 25% coal-derived
middle distillate (from different processes), 478 and 482, are almost
identical.

B.   Particulate Mass Emissions

     Particulate mass emissions during the two transient cycles and the three
steady-states are summarized in Table 15.  Individual run data are located on
the computer printouts in Appendix C.  FTP and HFET results are presented
graphically in Figure 13.  The trends by fuel are similar for both operating
cycles except for the 25% SRC-II.  The 25% SRC-II particulate mass rate was
56 percent above the base fuel rate during the FTP, but the rates were the
same during the HFET.  One possibility is that the combustion of the SRC-II
material improves as the vehicle warms up.  Particulate mass emission increases
were observed with the Coal Case 5A, and to a lesser extent with the EDS blends.
These results are not unexpected, based on an earlier study.^  In that study,
a regression equation for particulate mass emissions from a single vehicle was
formulated.  Particulate increases were associated  with fuel aromatic content
and fuel nitrogen increases.  The 25% SRC-II blend had the highest aromatic
and nitrogen levels of the blends tested.  As stated earlier in the report,
the 25% EDS naphtha test blend was evaluated only on selected cycles, and for
selected emissions.  Broadcut fuel decreased particulate emission 16 percent
during the FTP, and 32 percent during the HFET as compared with the base.  The
poor combusion characteristics of the 35% SRC-II are shown in Table 15 as a
significant particulate increase.  Filter plugging prevented further testing
of this material.
             TABLE 15.  AVERAGE PARTICULATE MASS EMISSION DATA
Fuel Code
EM-329-F
EM-453-F
EM-473-F
EM-474-F
EM-476-F
EM-475-F
EM-478-F
EM-482-F
EM-485-F
Fuel Type
Base DF-2
Shale Diesel Marine
Paraho JP-5
Coal Case 5A
Broadcut
35% SRC-II
25% SRC-II
25% EDS
25% EDS Naphtha
Grams Particulate per Kilometer
Calculated
1981 FTP
0.25
0.27
0.25
0.32
0.21
2.06b
0.39
0.28
0.30
HFET
0.25
0.27
0.26
0.35
0.17
	
0.24
0.28
	
Steady-State
Idlea
0.71
0.60
0.48
1.14
0.84
	
1.53
1.05
	
50 kph
0.17
0.18
0.08
0.14
0.08
	
0.13
0.17
	
85 kph
0.28
0.36
0.26
0.46
0.20
	
0.24
0.28
	
 Emissions in g/h instead of g/km
 Calculated on basis of cold 505 data
                                     44

-------
0.5
A = Base DF-2
E = Broadcut
B = Shale diesel marine F = 25% SRC-II
C = Paraho JP-5
D = Coal Case 5A
G = 25% EDS
H = 25% EDS naphtha
                                                                                     D
                              FTP                                                   HFET




                     Figure 13.  Particulate mass emissions- during FTP and HFET cycles.

-------
     Steady-state data show that the idle mode is the chief contributor to
the increases observed in the FTP data for the coal-derived liquid blends
(Coal Case 5A, 25% SRC-II, and the two EDS fuels).  These data also help to
explain the particulate emission decreases for 25% SRC-II from the FTP to the
HFET.  At higher speeds the 25% SRC-II particulate emissions are lower than
the base fuel.

C.   Particulate Size Distribution

     Data from impactor runs were analyzed and are presented as percent of
the total particulate mass by stage in Table 16.   Table 16 shows that in most
cases, over half the particulate mass was composed of particles smaller than
0.2 urn.  Coal Case 5A generated the smallest particles (about 90-percent
<0.2 ym).  Largest particles were seen with the 35% SRC-II blend, although
these particles were collected only during the cold 505 seconds of the FTP;
while the other samples were collected during an entire "4-bag" FTP.

     Table 17 lists the particle size distributions as cumulative mass per-
cent smaller than stage cutoff diameter,  and these data are shown graphically
in Figure 14.  This graph indicates a fairly wide variation in size distribu-
tions by fuel, with a substantial fraction of the variation occurring on the
back-up filter.  The 25% EDS blend generated about the same distribution of
particle sizes as the 25% SRC-II blend.

D.   Analysis of Particulate Composition

     This subsection includes data on major elements and trace elements.  Car-
bon and hydrogen analyses were performed on particulate collected using 47 mm
glass fiber filters.  Particulate collected on 47 mm Fluoropore filters was
analyzed for trace elements.

     Carbon and hydrogen data are listed in Table 18.  As seen in an earlier
study (3); the data show fairly high carbon content, indicative of "dry" or soot-
like particulate material in most cases.   The 25% SRC-II blend gave somewhat
lower carbon percentage in particulates,  indicating a more oily material.  The
hydrogen content of this particulate sample, however, does not support the
oily material supposition.  The technique used to analyze carbon and hydrogen
content of particulate collected on glass fiber filters appears somewhat ques-
tionable based on these results and others.' '^ A new procedure is needed to
insure correct and accurate analysis of particulate collected on glass fiber
filters.

     Data on trace elements are given in Appendix D, page D-10.  As a whole,
these elements made up 0.3% to 1.6% of the particulate mass.  The trace elements
found most commonly in the particulate matter were sulfur, iron, nickel, calcium,
and zinc.   Possible sources of iron and nickel are wear products from the engine
and exhaust system.  Sulfur, calcium, and zinc can probably be attributed to
                                     46

-------
                                TABLE 16.  PARTICULATE  SIZE  DISTRIBUTION
Fuel Code
EM-329-F
EM-329-F
EM-453-F
EM-473-F
EM-474-F
EM-474-F
EM-476-F
EM-475-F
EM-478-F
EM-482-F
Fuel Description
Base DF-2
Base DF-2
Shale Diesel Marine
Paraho JP-5
Coal Case 5A
Coal Case 5A
Broadcut
35% SRC-II
25% SRC-II
25% EDS
Percent of Total Particulate
Stage 3
9.5 uma
4.9
6.8
2.0
0.0
0.70
0.0
3.1
1.5
5.2
2.1
Stage 4
5.8 yma
2.7
6.3
2.7
3.0
3.7
0.90
3.7
2.2
3.6
3.1
Stage 5
3.7 uma
6.3
2.0
0.91
8.0
0.0
0.68
3.8
2.4
2.7
2.7
Stage 6
2.1 yra
4.4
2.3
1.8
8.0
1.8
4.9
5.1
3.6
3.9
4.6
Stage 7
1.2 uma
8.2
5.7
2.9
5.0
1.4
4.2
3.6
2.9
7.2
4.8
Stage 8
0.8 uma
5.0
2.3
4.2
4.1
0.0
0.23
3.6
8.3
4.4
3.8
Stage 9
0.5 ym
6.1
2.7
3.3
9.1
0.87
0.0
2.3
23.
5.9
3.8
Stage 10
0.2 yma
7.9
6.7
2.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
16.
6.8
7.0
Filter
55.
65.
80.
63.
92.
89.
75.
40.
60.
68.
Vehicle
Total
Particulate
g/ cycle
5.81
6.05
6.58
6.00
7.80
7.82
5.12
17.85b
8.49
7.12
abased on 47 mm Pallflex for 4-bag FTP
 based on 903 seconds of first FTP only

-------
                          TABLE  17.   CUMULATIVE  PARTICLE  SIZE DISTRIBUTION DURING COLD AND HOT FTP
Fuel Code
EM-329-F
EM-329-F
EM-453-F
EM-473-F
EM-474-F
EM-474-F
EM-476-F
EM-475-F
EM-478-F
EM-482-F
Fuel Description
Base DF-2
Base DF-2
Shale Diesel Marine
Paraho JP-5
Coal Case 5A
Coal Case 5A
Broadcut
35% SRC-II
25% SRC-II
25% EDS
Cumulative Percent of Total Particulate
Stage 3
9.5 yma
100.5
99. a
100.4
100.2
100.5
99.9
100.2
99.9
99.7
99.9
Stage 4
5 .8 ym
95.6
93.0
98.4
100.2
99.8
99.9
97.1
98.4
94.5
97.8
Stage 5
3.7 yma
92.9
86.7
95.7
97.2
96.1
99.0
93.4
96.2
90.9
94.7
Stage 6
2.1 yma
86.6
84.7
94.8
89.2
96.1
98.3
89.6
93.8
88.2
92.0
Stage 7
1.2 yma
82.2
82.4
93.0
81,2
94.3
93.4
84.5
90.2
84.3
87.4
Stage 8
0.8 yma
74.0
76.7
90.1
76.2
92.9
89.2
80.9
87.3
77.1
82.6
Stage 9
0.5 ym
69.0
74.4
85.9
72.1
92.9
89.0
77.3
79.0
72.7
78.8
Stage 10
0.2 yma
62.9
71.7
82.6
63.0
92.0
89.0
75.0
56.0
66.8
75.0
Filter
55.
65.
80.
63.
92.
89.
75.
40.
60.
68.
Vehicle
Total
Particulate
g/cycle
5.81
6.05
6.58
6.00
7.80
7.82
5.12
17.85b
8.49
7.12
00
    fbased  on  47  mm Pallflex for 4-bag FTP
     based  on  903 seconds  of first FTP only

-------
                 Base DF-2
                 Shale Diesel
                  Marine
                 Paraho JP-5
        —  — » •  Coal Case 5A
              «»• Broadcut
               — 35% SRC-II
           . . .  — 25% SRC-II
           ••••• 25% EDS
0.2
         20
40     60       80     90   95    98  99
   Cumulative Percent Smaller than BCD
99.9
       Figure 14.  Cumulative particle size distributions by impactor.
                                     49

-------
        TABLE 18.  CARBON AND HYDROGEN IN EXHAUST PARTICULATE MATTER
Fuel
Code
EM-329-F
EM-453-F
EM-473-F
EM-474-F
EM-476-F
EM-478-F
EM-482-F
Fuel
Description
base DF-2
shale diesel
marine
Paraho JP-5
Coal Case 5A
Broadcut
25% SRC-II
25% EDS
Cycle
FTPc
FTPh
HFET
FTPc
FTPh
HFET
FTPc
FTPh
HFET
FTPc
FTPh
HFET
FTPc
FTPh
HFET
FTPc
FTPh
HFET
FTPc
FTPh
HFET
Weight Percent
Carbon
81.6
80.3
83.6
84.8
86.6
91.0
88.6
90.8
93.7
87.5
88.2
87.4
83.3
78.1
77.9
68.8
65.9
41.9
78.9
82.5
84.3
Hydrogen
2.89
2.73
2.95
2.53
2.30
2.05
2.32
2.74
2.39
2.02
2.28
1.76
2.91
3.13
3.00
3.14
2.20
0.97
1.75
2.00
4.96
Vehicle Total
Particulate , g/testa
2.708
2.575
2.512
3.630
2.556
3.882
2.949
2.104
3.359
3.507
2.817
5.117
2.505
1.941
2.512
2.677
2.129
3.444
3.943
2.921
4.569
Based on 47 mm Pallflex
                                    50

-------
fuel sulfur and lubricating oil additives.  The 25% SRC-II blend was associated
with measureable amounts of lead, manganese and bromine in the hot FTP and
HFET, while samples taken with the other fuels exhibited little of these ele-
ments, if any.

E.   Composition of Organic Solubles in Particulate Matter

     The organic soluble portion of the particulate was obtained from particu-
late samples collected on 20x20 inch Pallflex filters, using Soxhlet extraction
procedures  (methylene chloride as solvent).  The amounts of organic solubles
extracted are presented in Table 19 as percent of the total particulate mass.
This result gives an indication of the split between soot and condensed organ-
ics in the total particulate matter.  During the FTP, the Broadcut and 25%
SRC-II test fuels generated particulate with substantially higher solubles
than the base fuel  (25% vs 18%).  These values indicate a more oily particu-
late, possibly containing more unburned fuel.  Gaseous hydrocarbon increases
were also seen with these two fuels, supporting this supposition.  During the
HFET, the Broadcut again increased the amount of organic solubles; but the 25%
SRC-II gave about the same levels as the base fuel.  The 25% EDS naphtha gen-
erated particulate matter with solubles lower than those for the base fuel
during both the FTP and the HFET.

     A portion of the organic soluble material was analyzed for carbon and
hydrogen.  The results are given in Table 19.  All the elemental data are
indicative of hydrocarbon-like materials  (numeric H/C ratio between 1.79 and
1.83).  Overall, there is no appreciable difference between the seven fuels
or the two cycles regarding carbon and hydrogen content of the resulting
organic solubles.

F.   Gas Chromatograph "Boiling Range" Analysis of Organic Solubles

     The organic soluble portion of particulate matter resembles a very heavy
oil or a varnish.  A high-temperature GC-simulated boiling point distribution,
with an internal standard, was determined by an analysis of organic soluble
material from particulate generated with each fuel.  Table 20 summarizes the
results for samples generated during both the FTP and HFET.  The chromatograms
for each of the samples summarized in Table 20, along with an example analysis
of a crude oil and a calibration run, are located in Appendix D, Figures
D-9 through D-25.

     FTP results show that solubles from tests on the Broadcut, 25% SRC-II
and 25% EDS test fuels show slightly lower boiling ranges as compared with
the base fuel for the first 40%.  The percent recovery for the solubles indi-
cates that in some cases, a sizeable amount of material (over 30 percent)
boils over 640°C.  Based on recoveries, Broadcut fuel yielded the largest
amount of organic solubles boiling under 640°C.  Most of the test fuels emitted
more organic soluble compounds whose boiling points were under 640°C for the
HFET than for the FTP.  Over ninety percent of the compounds generated using
                                    51

-------
                         TABLE 19.   COMPOSITION OF ORGANIC SOLUBLES FROM PARTICULATE MATTER
Fuel
Code
EM-329-F
EM-453-F
EM-473-F
EM-474-F
EM-476-F
EM-478-F
EM-482-F
Fuel
Description
base DF-2
shale diesel
marine
Paraho JP-5
Coal Case 5A
Broadcut
25% SRC-II
25% EDS
Cycleb
FTP
HFET
FTP
HFET
FTP
HFET
FTP
HFET
FTP
HFET
FTP
HFET
FTP
fIFET
Weight Percent
Carbon
85.2
85.5
85.6
85.7
85.4
85.6
85.6
85.6
85.5
85.2
85.3
85.0
84.8
85.5
Hydrogen
12.9
12.9
13.0
13.0
13.1
13.0
12.9
13.0
13.0
12.9
12.8
13.0
12.8
13.0
Vehicle Total
Solubles, g/test
1.150
0.810
1.098
0.838
0.801
0.661
1.488
0.750
1.181
0.682
1.771
0.658
0.955
0.602
% of Total
Particulate
18.0
18.0
17.7
17.0
12.2
16.4
17.6
12.0
25.2
23.9
25.6
16.4
13.1
12.7
Ul
to
         based on 20x20 Pallflex  filters
         "4-bag" FTP's

-------
                   TABLE 20.  CHROMATOGRAPH ANALYSIS OF ORGANIC SOLUBLES IN PARTICULATE MATTER


Fuel Description
Fuel Code
IBP
10% point
20% point
30% point
40% point
50% point
60% point
70% point
80% point
90% point
EP
Recovery @ 640 °C

Fuel Code
IBP
10% point
20% point
30% point
40% point
50% point
60% poiny
70% point
80% point
90% point
EP
Recovery @ 640 °C
Boiling Temperature, °C, at Distillation Point by Fuel during 4-bag FTP

Base DF-2
EM-329-F
318
365
388
416
451
494
537
605
—
—
—
70.0
Shale Diesel
Marine
EM-453-F
307
358
379
402
429
463
499
531
603
—
—
80.1

Paraho JP-5
EM-473-F
337
374
397
422
451
482
510
548
—
—
—
77.5

Coal Case 5 A.
EM-474-F
307
357
376
396
425
472
525
—
—
—
—
67.0

Broadcut
EM-476-F
235
357
381-
401
422
449
493
539
599
—
—
86.0

25% SRC-II
EM-478-F
249
347
367
389
427
495
581
—
—
—
—
65.0

25% EDS
EM-482-F
251
357
377
396
421
455
497
539
611
—
—
82.8
Boiling Temperature, °C, at Distillation Point by Fuel during HFET
EM-329-F
325
374
400
429
462
492
526
582
—
—
—
71.7
EM-453-F
314
365
384
409
436
469
503
549
—
—
~~
78.8
EM-473-F
236
367
394
419
446
471
498
526
572
630
— —
91.4
EM-474-F
336
378
399
422
445
471
495
520
569
—
~^
85.6
EM-476-F
239
363
387
410
435
466
500
537
600
—
~~-
84.6
EM-478-F
242
358
385
412
442
476
510
552
611
—
~~
83.6
EM-482-F
238
363
384
407
432
461
490
520
566
639
— —
90.2
Ul
u>

-------
Paraho JP-5 and 25% EDS middle distillate boiled under 640°C.  This fraction
is high compared to the 72 percent base fuel value.

G.   Fractionation by Relative Polarity

     Composition of the soluble organic fraction of the particulate is com-
plex, and its separation into individual compounds is very difficult.  Frac-
tionation of the organic solubles by high performance liquid chromatography
(HPLC) separates the soluble portion into a series of fractions of increasing
molecular polarity.  This procedure(15) is not quantitative, but provides a
method to collect fractions with generally different polarities.  All samples
were analyzed at the same time, having the same ratio of organic extract and
carrier solvent.  Therefore, the results can be compared to one.another on a
relative basis to estimate increases or decreases of compound classes which
differ from each other by molecular polarity.  Figure 15 through 22 show the
HPLC chromatographic outputs for direct comparison of the relative response
of increasingly polar compounds at the wavelengths discussed in Section IV,
Part E-5 of the report.

     Each figure contains three traces, one representing the carrier solvent
composition, a second representing the ultraviolet detector response, and
the third representing the fluorescence detector response.  Figure 15 shows
the response of BaP and 9-fluorenone.  BaP and similar compounds elute in
this non-polar region.  Near the end of the transition period (i.e., solvent
polarity now polar) 9-fluorenone elutes.  With 100 percent methylene chloride,
even more polar compounds elute.  For example, acridine elutes during this
polar period (at about 70 minutes).

     A CRC study( $' indicated that compounds which fluoresce in the transi-
tion  fraction  (i.e. 20 to 30 minutes elution time, which is a fraction of in-
termediate polarity) yielded the highest Ames response (i.e. mutagenic acti-
vity).  During this period, 20.9 percent of the Ames activity was associated
with 2.5 weight percent of the organic soluble material.   Figures 16 through
22 show that the greatest fluorescence response in this fraction (20 to 30
minutes elution time)  was associated with the Paraho JP-5.  The Broadcut and
Coal Case 5A fuels also showed a high fluorescence response in this fraction.
On the other hand, the 25% EDS material did not yield any response in this
fraction, while the base fuel responded only slightly.  The 25% SRC-II blend
gave a peak shape similar to the Broadcut and Coal Case 5A fuels, but with a
smaller total area.  In summary, based on the results of the aforementioned
CRC data, increases in Ames activity as compared to the base fuel may be
observed for all the fuels except the 25% EDS blend.

     In the period between 2 and 10 minutes elution time, polynuclear com-
pounds, which are relatively non-polar  (such as BaP), elute.  Several of
these compounds are mutagenic.  The particulate extract from all of the test
fuels show high UV fluorescence response in this fraction.  The 25% EDS blend
                                    54

-------
                                           SOLVENT POLARITY
                           Time, minutes

          Figure 15.   HPLC response to BaP and 9-fluorenone,
                                          SOLVENT POLARITY
-I	[FLUORESCENCE
            i ;
              60
50       40        30
   Time,  minutes
20
10
  Figure 16.  HPLC response  to  extract generated from Base DF-2.


                                55

-------
                                              SOLVENT POLARITY
                        FLUORESCENC
                           T ~
                           50        40
 I

70
60
                              Time,  minutes

Figure 17.  HPLC response to extract generated from Shale Diesel Marine.
                                            ^SOLVENT POLARITY
                                              i

                                    40       30

                              Time, minutes


    Figure 18.   HPLC response to extract generated from Paraho JP-5.


                                  56

-------
                                          SOLVENT POLARITY  __

                                                I  .
                                                i  i
   I -- FLUORESCENCEU-
                                          i


                       50        40        30

                          Time, minutes


Figure 19.  HPLC response to extract generated from Coal Case 5A.
                                           SOLVENT POLARITY
                        T	1	T

                        50       40       30


                           Time, minutes



   Figure 20.   HPLC response to extract generated from Broadcut.




                                57

-------
                                        SOLVENT POLARITY
                               40


                         Time, minutes



  Figure 21.  HPLC response to extract  generated  from  25% SRC-II.
( 1-
j i
T" 1 "
i

.





h-
.
r -1—
!
1
1
_. |
— -

-


^™


-


                                         SOLVENT POLARITY
     -t—-i	'—I
     -4_,_.i..._L_4—I
_  :_ ._ i	


 FLUORESCENCE
                               40


                          Time, minutes



  Figure 22.  HPLC response to extract generated from 25% EDS.
                                58

-------
  responses appear different from any of the other samples in this fraction
  with a single large fluorescence peak and no UV activity, reminiscent of the
  run with compounds shown in Figure 15.  Treating the entire HPLC chromatograms
  as "fingerprints", it is interesting to note that Coal Case 5A and the Broad-
  cut fuel generated almost identical traces.

  H.   Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) in Organic Solubles

       BaP results are presented in Table 21, and are shown graphically in Fig-
  ure 23.  The BaP present in the organic soluble portion of the particulate
  for the fuels tested is substantially higher (about a factor of 10) than that
  found in other studies.(3/6,17)  Time was spent to verify these results by
  checking the procedure, solvents, calculations, and parameters.  This group
  of samples was also run between samples generated on other in-house studies.
  The results of the samples that bracketed this study's samples indicated
  typically low BaP values, substantiating the unexpectedly high values for
  this test vehicle.  HPLC analyses showed a large amount of non-polar poly-
  nuclear compounds similar to BaP.
        TABLE  21.  BaP PRESENT IN ORGANIC SOLUBLES DURING FTP  + FTP
                                                             c      h
Fuel Code
EM-329-F
EM-453-F
EM-473-F
EM-474-F
EM-476-F
EM-478-F
EM-482-F
EM-485-F
Fuel Description
base DF-2
shale diesel marine
Paraho JP-5
Coal Case 5A
Broadcut
25% SRC-II
25% EDS
25% EDS naphtha
Filter No.
5830.3-
P20-82,83
P20-48,49
P20-57,58
P20-69,70
P20-72,73
P20-98,99
P20-107,108
P20-lll,112
Part.
Rate,
g/kma
0.25
0.32
0.27
0.34
0.23
0.28
0.34
0.29
% Organic
Extract.
14.6
14.8
13.6
15.0
25.0
20.7
14.6
12.7
% BaP
in Extract
0.042
0.071
0.087
0.085
0.053
0.017
0.050
0.023
BaP Rate
yg/km
14.9
34.0
31.6
44.1
30.2
10.0
24.3
8.7
based on 20x20 Pallflex filters
                                       59

-------
en
o
                                                                     Shale Diesel Marine
                      10
20
 30          40

BaP Emissions  yg/km
 I


50
                                                                                  60
                                                             70
                                    Figure 23.   BaP emissions during FTP.

-------
     The  largest  BaP  emissions  was  associated with the  Coal Case  5A fuel
 about  3 times higher  than  for the base  fuel.   Values  up to  twice  the base
 fuel level were seen  with  the Shale Diesel, Paraho JP-5,  Broadcut,  and 25%
 EDS.   Slight reductions were observed with  the 25% EDS  Naphtha  and  25% SRC-II.
 Comparing the 25% EDS middle distillate with  the  25%  SRC-II shows that the
 25% EDS produced  twice the BaP  associated with the 25%  SRC-II.  However, a
 lighter cut of the EDS material, 25% EDS naphtha,  resulted  in approximately
 the same  BaP emissions at  the 25% SRC-II.

 I.   Mutagenic Activity by Ames Testing

     The  Ames test, as employed in  this program,  refers to  a bacterial muta-
 genesis plate assay with Salmonella typhimurium according to the  method of
 Ames.(14)  This bioassay determines the ability of chemical compounds  or mix-
 tures  to  cause mutation of DNA  in the bacteria, positive  results  occurring
 when histidine-dependent strains of bacteria  revert (or are mutated) genetically
 to forms  which can synthesize histidine on  their  own.   Samples  of the  soluble
 organic fraction  representing transient composites were submitted for  bioassay
 over  five tester  strains,  TA1535, TA1537, TA1538,  TA98  and  TA100.

     All  five tester  strains are histidine-dependent cells by virtue of muta-
 tions within the  histidine  functional genetic  unit.  When these histidine-
 dependent cells are grown  on minimal  medium agar plates containing a limited
 amount of histidine,  only  those cells that revert  to histidine independence
 are able  to form  colonies.  The trace amount of histidine allows  all the
 bacteria plated to undergo  a few divisions,  which  is essential for mutagenesis
 to occur.  It is  these histidine-independent revertants which are scored as
 colonies  against  a slight  background  growth consisting of histidine-requiring
 cells that have depleted the histidine present within the minimal medium.

     In addition  to mutations in the histidine functional genetic unit, all
 the tester strains have a  defective  lipopolysaccharide coat which allows
 large molecules to permeate the bacterial wall, thus increasing bacterial
 sensitivity to mutagenic aromatic compounds.  Furthermore, a UV mutation
 decreased bacterial sensitivity to  additional mutagenic agents.    TA1535 and
 its plasmid-containing counterpart,  TA100, detect base pair substitutions;
while TA1537 (and TA1538 with its plasmid-containing counterpart, TA98)
 respond to frameshift mutagens.   The plasmids present in TA98 and TA100 are
believed to cause an  increase in error-prone DNA repair       leads to
more mutations.    Thus, the  five tester  strains in  tandem provide  a very
 sensitive method  for  the detection  of potentially mutagenic environmental
samples.

     Table 22 summarizes the results  in revertants per microgram  of extract.
In most cases,  the two EDS blends,   EM-482-F and EM-485-F, exhibited the
                                      61

-------
TABLE 22.  SUMMARY OF AMES BIOASSAY ANALYSIS OF ORGANIC
 SOLUBLES FROM PARTICULATE MATTER COLLECTED DURING FTP
Fuel Code
EM-329-F
EM-453-F
EM-473-F
EM-474-F
EM-476-F
EM-478-F
EM-482-F
EM-485-F
Description
base DF-2
shale diesel
marine
Paraho JP-5
Coal Case 5A
Broadcut
25% SRC-II
25% EDS
25% EDS
naphtha
RLI-16
Activation
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Model Predicted
Mean Slope, revertants/yg extract
TA-1535
0.5
0.1
0.5
0.1
0
0.2
0
0.1
0
0.2
0.6
0.1
0.1
0.2
0
0.1
TA-1537
1.9
1.4
4.3
4.8
4.8
1.9
5.8
4.0
5.5
4.2
6.3
7.0
12.5
8.2
13.2
12.2
TA-1538
3.7
3.5
6.6
11.0
6.8
10.3
8.3
8.7
9.6
10.6
10.0
12.0
11.4
10.9
18.5
16.2
TA-98
6.0
3.1
.12.0
6.3
5.5
4.0
13.2
5.2
13.4
5.0
10.4
5.3
24.3
8.8
19.8
9.0
TA-100
17.1
7.2
30.5
14.5
14.3
5.7
23.8
20.7
44.6
14.2
61.3
13.7
19.7
16.3
17.4
8.6
                             62

-------
greatest number of revertants per microgram of extract for strains TA1535,
TA-1537, TA-1538, and TA-98.  This relationship occurred whether or not
metabolic activation was applied.  Results for strain TA-100 without activa-
tion indicated that the 25% SRC-II and the Broadcut fuel were associated with
the greatest number of revertants per microgram.  Once metabolically activated,
the extracts from the 25% SRC-II and the Broadcut fuel tests acted much like
those from the 25% EDS, Coal Case 5A, and shale diesel marine evaluations.
It is interesting to note that the TA-100 strain responded equally to both
the 25% EDS naphtha blend and the base DF-2.

     A comparison of "distance specific" Ames activity is shown in Table 23.
These data take into account the particulate rate and percent organic extract-
ables from each fuel blend, resulting in Ames activity as revertants per
kilometer.  Data in this form indicate that the base DF-2 and the Paraho JP-5
generally yielded lower Ames responses than the other fuels for all five
strains.  Strain TA-100 without metabolic activation indicated that the 25%
SRC-II blend and the Broadcut blend were associated with the most revertants
per kilometer.  Once activation was applied, the revertants were reduced to
approximately the same levels as those for some of the other blends.  In the
majority of cases, metabolic activation reduced Ames activity on all 5 strains.
This trend implies that the organic soluble portion of the particulate matter
from the fuels tested probably contained direct-acting mutagens as well as
indirect-acting mutagens.

     The Paraho JP-5 fuel, EM-473-F, was associated with the greatest fluor-
escence response during the transition period on the HPLC polarity profile,
and twice the level of BaP generated with the base DF-2 fuel.  It was antici-
pated that the Paraho JP-5 would show high Ames response, based on a CRC
study d^) an(j the fact that BaP is a known mutagen; but the Ames data did not
support this supposition.  The greatest Ames response was associated with the
25% SRC-II and the Broadcut on strain TA-100.  Samples generated using two
blends also had much higher HPLC ultraviolet responses at both 8 and 38 min-
utes, as compared to the other blends.  The 25% EDS sample also had a high
peak at 38 minutes, but no response at 8 minutes.  At 8 minutes, in the non-
polar region, BaP and similar PNA compounds elute.  Broadcut fuel was associated
with higher BaP emissions than base fuel, while the 25% SRC-II did not.  It
is possible that some of these fuels emitted organics which contained PNA's
and possibly BaP isomers that were not detected in the BaP analytical procedure,
but were seen in the HPLC polarity profile and also caused high Ames responses.
                                    63

-------
                   TABLE 23.   SUMMARY OF AMES BIOASSAY RESULTS IN
                          REVERTANTS PER DISTANCE DURING FTP
Fuel Code
EM-329-F
EM-453-F
EM-473-F
EM-474-F
EM-476-F
EM-478-F
EM-482-F
EM-485-F
Description
base DF-2
shale diesel
marine
Paraho JP-5
Coal Case 5A
Broadcut
25% SRC-II
25% EDS
25% EDS
naphtha
RLI-16
Activation
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Model Predicted
Mean Slope, 103 revertants/kma
TA-1535
18
4
24
5
0
7
0
5
0
12
34
4
5
10
0
4
TA-1537
70
51
204
227
177
70
296
204
316
242
365
406
620
407
486
449
TA-1538
135
128
313
521
250
378
423
444
552
610
580
696
566
541
681
597
TA-98
219
113
568
298
202
147
673
265
771
288
603
307
1206
437
729
331
TA-100
624
263
1444
687
525
447
1214
1055
2564
817
3553
794
978
809
641
316
Calculation incorporates particulate  mass  rates  based on 47mm Pallflex filters,
 percent organic solubles extracted from Pallflex "20 x 20"  filters,  and data in
 Table 21.
                                            64

-------
                                 REFERENCES
 1.   Federal Register, Vol.  44, No.  23, Part  IV, Thursday, February  1,  1979.

 2.   Smith, L.R., Parness, M.A., Fanick, E.R., and Dietzmann, H.E.,  "Analytical
      Procedures  for Characterizing Unregulated Emissions from Vehicles  Using
      Middle-Distillate Fuels."  Interim Report, Contract 68-02-2497, U.S.
      Environmental Protection Agency, Office  of Research and Development,
      April 1980.

 3.   Bykowski, B.B.,  "Characterization of Diesel Emissions as a Function of
      Fuel Variables."  Final Report, Contract 68-03-2707, U.S. Environmental
      Protection  Agency, Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control,  April,
      1981.

 4.   Hare, C.T., "Methodology for Determining Fuel Effects on Diesel Partic-
      ulate Emissions."  EPA  650/2-75-056.  U.S. Environmental Protection
      Agency, Office of Research and  Development, March 1975.

 5.   Hare, C.T., Springer, K.J., and Bradow, R.L., "Fuel and Additive Effects
      on Diesel Particulate-Development and Demonstration of Methodology." SAE
      Paper No. 760130, Detroit, Michigan, February 1976.

 6.   Hare, C.T., "Characterization of Gaseous and Particulate Emissions From
      Light-Duty  Diesels Operated on  Various Fuels."  Final Report Contract
      68-03-2440, U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency, July 1979.

 7.   Sefer, N.R., Russell, J.A., "Regional Refining Models for Alternative
      Fuels Using Shale and Coal Synthetic Crudes."  Annual Report for period
      20 March 1979 to 19 March 1980, Contract DOE/CS-50017-1, U.S. Department
      of Energy, Office of Transportation Programs, November 1980.

 8.   Sefer, N.R., "Regional Refining Models for Transportation Fuels from
      Shale Oil and Coal Syncrudes."  SAE Paper No. 810442,  Detroit, Michigan,
      February 1981.

 9.   Federal Register, Vol. 42, No.  124, Tuesday, June 28,  1977-

10.   Federal Register, Vol. 45, No.  45, Wednesday, March 5, 1980.

11.   Springer, K.J., and Baines, T.M., "Emissions from Diesel Versions of
      Production Passenger Cars."  SAE Paper No.  770818, Detroit, Michigan,
      September 1977.

12.   Levins,  P.L.,  and Kendall, D.A., "Application of Odor Technology to
      Mobile Source Emission Instrumentation."  CRC Project CAPE 7-68 under
      Contract No. 68-03-0561, September 1973.
                                      65

-------
13.  Swarin, S.J., and William, R.L., "Liquid Chromatographic Determination
     of Benzo(a)pyrene in Diesel Exhaust Particulate:  Verification of the
     Collection and Analytical Methods", Research Publication GMR-3127,
     General Motors Research Laboratories,  Warren, Michigan, October 23, 1979.

14.  Ames, B.,  McCann, J.,  Yamasaki,  E., "Methods for Detecting Carcinogens
     and Mutagens with Samonella Mammalian-Microsome Mutagenicity Test."
     Mutation Research, 31, pp. 347-364, 1975.

15.  Perez, J.M., et al,  "Informational Report  of the Measurement and
     Characterization of  Diesel Exhaust Emissions."  CRC-APRAC Project No.
     CAPI-1-64, Coordinating Research Council,  Inc. Atlanta, Georgia, December
     1980.

16.  Springer,  K.J., "Investigation of Diesel-Powered Vehicle Emissions VII."
     Interim Report, Contract 68-03-2116, U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency,
     Office of  Mobile Source Air Pollution  Control, February 1977.

17.  Williams,  R.L., and  Swarin,  S.J.,  "Benzo(a)pyrene Emissions  from Gasoline
     and Diesel Automobiles."  SAE  Paper 790419,  Detroit,  Michigan,  March 1979.
                                    66

-------
       APPENDIX A

   CONTRACT 68-03-2884
TASK SPECIFICATION NUMBER 3
      SCOPE OF WORK

-------
                        Alternate Fuels - Task 3
                             Scope of Uork

The objective of this work is to characterize in. a well controlled
manner the mobile source emissions effects of alternate fuels.  The
results of the completion of this work will be a data base on the
emissions characteristics of soraa specific alternate fuels, as compared
to conventional petroleum-derived national average Diesel fuel and
gasoline.  In order to achieve the objectives of this ^work, the following
tasks shall be performed,

Task I — Obtain Representative Fuels

The contractor shall obtain  test quantities of up to nine suitable fuels
in accordance with the Project Officers technical direction,  it is
expected  that EPA shall  do much of the initial work to locate suitable
fuels, but the contractor should be prepared, to follow-up the acquisition.
efforts with regards to  shipping and receiving the candidate fuels.
Also,  the contractor should  be prepared to expend effort toward contacting
potential sources.of alternate fuels upon the direction of the Project
Officer.

A list- of potential fuels for this effort are included below.

                          Diesel' Fuels
                1.   National Average D2  (Baseline)
                2.   Oil  Shale D2  Parahoe Process  (Clean)
                3.   Oil  Shale D2  Precursor
                A.   Oil  Shale D2  (Alternate Refinery  Process)
                5.    Solvent Refined  Coal  D2
                6.   Wide Boiling Range D2
                7.    Oil Shale D2 (From Army)
                S.    Safety-D2  Low Emissions (From Army)
                9'.    High Nitrogen Shale-derived fuel
                                  A-2

-------
Tank II. - Fuel r.'naractcrizatioa

In order to better understand the performance and eraxssiony behavior of
the candidate fuels obtained for this contract, the contractor shall obtain
a detailed analysis of  the  fuel composition-  The types of information,
at a laininum, which will be required on each fuel, are listed below.

                          Fuel Composition Data

                1.    Gravity API
                2.    Cloud Point
                3.    ASTM Distillation
                4.    Flash PC.
                5.    Sulfur  Wt%
                6.    Cetane  Index                0 l *
                7-   . Fuel Composition (Paraffins,  Olef±n,e,  Aromatics)
                8.    PNA. level and, composition
                9.    Carbon/Hydrogen Ratio
                10.  Metal  content
                11.  Nitrogen content

 The contractor shall prepare a short report when "requested by the Project
 Officer for each fuel, which will contain the compositional information
 above, as well as a discussion of the suitability of the fuel for vehicular
 use.  An informed discussion of the source of the fuel and the suita-
 bility of the fuel as  a representative sample of its class (ex. a shale
 oil fuel compared to what  would be expected) by using contacts with
 responsible government and industry '.scientific personnel shall also be
 included.
                                   A-3

-------
Task III - Emir.sion. Testing

In. order to characterize the emissions characteristics of these fuels
the contractor shall conduct an emissions testing program for regulated
and unregulated emission compounds.

Vehicle Selection
The vehicle used for this part of the program shall be a VW Rabbit
Diesel or similar vehicle vhich will be supplied by the manufacturer
thru EPA, Upon receipt of the vehicle it shall be inspected and adjusted
to conform to raanufacturers specifications.

                Emissions Characterization Procedure
For  each  fuel,  the  vehicle shall be tested over triplicate repetitive
FTP's.  Duplicate tests of the HFET shall also be run.  During 2 of 3
FTP  tests regulated and unregulated emissions shall be measured.  Regu-
 lated emissions,  fuel  economy and particulate mass shall be measured
 during the remaining FTP and during the KFET.also.

 A proposed test sequence is represented below.  While this is expected
 to be the most logical sequence for this program, other alternates, with
 similar total effort,  may  be examined.  A discussion, of the emission.
 measurements to be made will be detailed in  the next" section.

                           Test ••Sequence
      1.   Verify and/or adjust.vehicle  to manufacturers specs.
      2.   Fill vehicle with  candidate fuel.
      3.    Operate vehicle  to  purge the  previous  fuel  remnants.
      A.   Test vehicle over  following sequence
                1975 FTP,  HFET
                1975 FTP,  HFET
                1975 FTP,  Ames tent collection cycle x times.
                First 505 of the LA—'»  for snoke emissions data.
                                  A-4

-------
The above test sequence shall be run for each fuel selected for tasting.
In addition,  this sequence shall be run 2 tines with baseline: fuel at
the onset of  the testing to establish a vehicle baselines  Also,, i;incc
sons time may elapso before testing sor?.e: o£ the fuel candidates, n. brief,
series of tests  (FTP's) nay be required to establish thr: condition of
the test vehicle after any prolonged testing pause.

Emissions Measurements

1.   HC, CO,  NOx, CO   and Fuel Economy shall be Treasured, in. accordance  •
     with published EPA procedures- over each PTP and K?ET  excluding the
     particulate collection replicates.  Results of these  measurements
     shall  be reported in. metric units and English equivalents.

2.   Particulate
      a).  Mass rate of particulate emissions shall be  determined under
           both FTP and HFET driving schedule according to  recommended
           EPA practice for testing light  duty  dxesel-povered vehicles-

      b)   Size distribution should be determined  over  the FTP cycle for
           each fuel tested.
     " c)   Metal content of total -particulate shaT.1 be  Treasured for those
           fuels for which the fuel analysis data indicates a high level
           of metal additives or contaminants..   The decision, of what
           fuels to test and x^hat .metals to analyze for will be deternined
           by-the Project Officer uith contractor input.
                                    A-5

-------
3.   Orgnnics:  A methodology should be-, employed for Che rapid collection
     of quantities oC particulate that are sufficient" for organics
     analyses.  The following analyses shall be performed:

     a)   Total mass emissions of soluble organics (this analysis will
          be performed by EPA on filters- supplied by SwRI).
     b)   Boiling range of soluble organics,
     c)   Carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen and sulfur content.  Also, selected
          oxygen content analyses shall be performed.
     d)   Polycyclic organic natter (POM). ~ Art indication of the POM
          emissions will be made By analyses of the benzo-a-pyrene  (BaP)
          content of the particulate emissions.  This will be achieved
          by obtaining filter samples and sending then to Dr.. KoT>ert
          Jungers, EPA/RTP.

      e)   Current research has indicated that the analysis of the organic,
                                                                    *
          extract from Diesel particulates by High Performance Liquid
          Chronrntography may provide  useful data for comparing, different
           fuels emission properties.  Thus the contractor shall be
           prepared  to a limited  number  (one per fvrel) of KPLC analysis
           of the Diesel particulate organic extract.  The measurement
          taethod used for  this analysis should be fully qualified by
           comparison via round robin  sample analysis with similar proce-
           dures within the research community-

 4.   Odor:   A limited number of  odor measurements shall be made  using
      the CRC Cape-7 DOAS odor measuring instrument.  The  specific
      conditions which these measurements are to be  made uill be  deter-
      mined by the Project Officer, with contractor  input.

  5.   Smoke:  Smoke emissions uill be determined for all fuel vai'iables
      over  the  first 505 seconds of the LA—'» driving cycle.   The PUS
      smoke motor shall be employed as well as an in-line, smoke meter.
                                   A-6

-------
G."   Ai;ics Tosi: Sawplcs:  The Contractor shall obtain one sample over the'"
     FTP for each fuel, store the sample and send, the sari'.plc to the
     designated laboratory performing the Arr.es test.  A total of 150 rig
     of extracted organic material x.'ill probably be needed for each.
     sample. The contractor shall gather the resultant data and include
     it in the Final Report.

7.   Bioassay Sample
     The contractor shall collect for at least four fuels a quantity of
     particulate sample  for inclusion into an in vitro battery of biological
     tests.  The particulate shall be collected in accordance with previously
     mentioned EPA procedures  for collecting sanple for Awes tests
     except  that a much  larger quantity (approximately 1 gram of organic
     natter) will  be  needed. The sample will be collected using a series
     of back-to-back  test  cycles, either  the IA—4 or I1PET cycles, immediately
     after the-Ames  test samples are collected.  The specific test  cycle
     will be .selected by the  Project Officer prior  to the start of  the
      emission testing tasks..
                                   A-7

-------
                  APPENDIX B





VOLKSWAGEN RABBIT LAB-TO-LAB CORRELATION RESULTS

-------
  TEST NO,    EPA-1     RUN   1
  VEHICLE MODEL   30 VU RABBIT
  ENGINE 1.5 L( 90.  CID) L-4
  TRANSMISSION M5
  BAROMETER 741,93 MM HG(29,21  IN HG)
  RELATIVE HUMIDITY  73,  PCT
  BAG RESULTS
     BAG NUMBER
     DESCRIPTION

     BLOWER DIP P MM. H20(IN, H20)
     SLOWER INLET P MM,  H20(IN,  1-120)
     BLOWER INLET TEMP,  DEG,  C(DEG. F)
     BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
     TOT FLOW STD,  CU, METRES(SCF)
     HC   SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
     HC   BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
     CO   SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
     CO   BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
  tp  C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
  ^  C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
     NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
     NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
     DILUTION FACTOR
     HC   CONCENTRATION PPM
     CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
     C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
     NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
     HC   MASS GRAMS
     CO   MASS GRAMS
     C02 MASS GRAMS
     NOX MASS GRAMS
     PARTICULATE  MASS GRAMS

     HC   GRAMS/KM
     CO   GRAMS/KM
     C02 GRAMS/KM
     NOX GRAMS/KM
     FUEL CONSUMPTION BY C3 L/100KM
     RUN  TIME             SECONDS
     MEASURED  DISTANCE    KM

COMPOSITE RESULTS
     TEST NUMBER        EPA-1
    BAROMETER    MM HG  741,9
    HUMIDITY     G/KG    13,1
    TEMPERATURE  DEG C   22,8
FTP    VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 11-5830-003

     VEHICLE NO.l
     DATE    7/16/80
     BAG CART NO,  1
     DYNO NO,      2
     CVS NO,   3

     DRY BULD TEMP,  22,3 DEG C(73,0  DEG F)
     ABS, HUMIDITY 13,1  GM/KG
          1
   COLD TRANSIENT
  .35
 1.10
185,6
  ,65
 7,01
504,
5,70
                  STABILIZED
711,2 (28,0)
563,9 (22,2)
37,2 ( 99,0)
13332,
105,9 ( 3740.)
36,6/il/ 37,
3,9/ 17 4,
55.3/13/ 53,
.5/13/ "0,
34, 7/ 3/ ,58
2,4/ 3/ ,04
17, 4/ 2/ 17.
,57 2/ 1,
22.75
33.
51, !'
,55
16,9
2,01
6,29
1057,3
3,72
1,99
711,2 (28,0)
563,9 (22,2)
36,1 ( 97,0)
23381,
179,3 ( 6331,)
20.4/11/ 20,
3,3/ I/ 3,
30,3/13/ 27,
,5/13/ 0,
21, I/ 3/ ,34
2,3/ 3/ ,04
12, 6/ 2/ 13.
,6/ 2/ 1,
33,83
17,
26.
,31
12,0
1.77
5.47
1005,0
4,47
1.86
                              ,29
                              ,73
                             6,16
                            868,
                            6,16
                                     TEST WEIGHT  1077,
                                     ACTUAL ROAD LOAD
                                     DIESEL    EPA
                                     ODOMETER  1873,  KM(
                KG( 2375,  LBS)
                5,1 KU(  6.8 HP)

                 1164.  MILES)
                                     NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR  1,08
HOT TRANSIENT

708,7 (27,9)
561,3 (22,1)
 38,3 (101,0)
   13329,
105,7 (  3731,)
37,4/U/  37,
 3,3/ I/   3,
49.2/13/  46,
  ,3/13/   0,
30,4/ 3/  ,50
 2,3/ 3/  ,04
17,3/ 2/  18,
  ,7/ 2/   1,
    26,22
     34,
     45.
     .47
    17,1
     2,09
     5,47
    907,3
     3,75
     1,99

      ,37
  .66
 6,04
504,
5.68
                                 CARBON DIOXIDE      G/KM
                                 FUEL  CONSUMPTION    L/100KM
                                 HYDROCARBONS  (THC)   G/KM
                                 CARBON MONOXIDE     G/KM
                                 OXIDES OF  NITROGEN   G/KM
                                 PARTICULATES         G/KM
                  STABILIZED
3-BAG
166,9
6,30
,32
,95
,<59
.325
(4-EAG)
< 0,0)
( 0,00)
( 0,00)
( 0,00)
( 0,00)
( 0.000)

-------
  TEST NO,   EPA-1    RUN   1
  VEHICLE MODEL   80 VU RABBIT
  ENGINE 1*5 L< 90. CID) L-4
  TRANSMISSION M5
  BAROMETER 741,93 MM HG(29.21 IN HG)
  RELATIVE HUMIDITY  49, PCT
0 BAG RESULTS
     TEST CYCLE

     BLOWER DIF P MM, H20(IN, H20)
     BLOWER INLET P MM, H20(IN. H20)
     BLOWER INLET TEMP, DEG, C
-------
  TEST NO.    EPA-2    RUN   1
  VEHICLE MODEL   SO VW RABBIT
  ENGINE 1.5 L( 90,  CID) L-4
  TRANSMISSION M5
  BAROMETER 740.41 MM HO(29.15 IN HG)
  RELATIVE HUMIDITY  53. PCT
  BAG RESULTS
     BAG NUMBER
     DESCRIPTION

     BLOWER DIP P MM. H2Q(IN,  H20)
     BLOWER INLET P MM,  H20(IN,  H20)
     BLOWER INLET TEMP,  DEG,  C(DEG. F)
     BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
     TOT FLOW STD, CU. METRES(SCF)
     I-IC  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
     HC  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
     CO  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
     CO  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   w C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
   I C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
     NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
     NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
     DILUTION FACTOR
     HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
     CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
     C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
     NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
     HC  MASS GRAMS
     CO  MASS GRAMS
     C02 MASS GRAMS
     NOX MASS GRAMS
     PARTICULATE MASS GRAMS

     HC  GRAMS/KM
     CO  GRAMS/KM
     C02 GRAMS/KM
     NOX GRAMS/KM
     FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
     RUN TIME             SECONDS
     MEASURED  DISTANCE    KM

COMPOSITE RESULTS
     TEST NUMBER        EPA-2
    BAROMETER    MM HG  740,4
    HUMIDITY     G/KG    10,7
    TEMPERATURE  DEB C   25,0
FTP    VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 11-5830-003

     VEHICLE NO,!
     DATE    7/17/30
     BAG CART NO,   1
     DYNO NO,      2
     CVS NO,   3

     DRY BULB TEMP,  25,0 DEG C<77,0 DEG  F)
     ABS, HUMIDITY 10.7 GM/KG
          1
   COLD TRANSIENT

    708,7 (27,9)
    553,8 (22,0)
     37,8 (100,0)
       13327,
    105,6 (  3729,)
    40,3/H/  41,
     3,6/ I/   4,
    53.7/13/  51,
     1.1/13/   1,
    34,6/ 3/  ,58
     2,6/ 3/  ,04
    17.?/ 2/  13.
     1,1/ 2/   1,
        22,81
         37,
         49,
         ,54
        16,8
         2,28
         5,99
       1045,1
         3,40
         1,94

          ,40
         1,06
        184,3
          ,60
         6,97
        504,
        5,67
  STABILIZED

706,1 (27,8)
553,8 (22,0)
 36,4 ( 97,5)
   23506,
179,9 ( 6353.)
21,7/H/  22,
 3,0/ I/   3,
30.7/13/  23.
  ,5/13/   0,
21.O/ 3/  .34
 2,8/ 3/  ,04
13,I/ 2/  13,
  ,9/ 2/   1,
    39,01
     19,
     27,
     ,30
    12,2
     1,95
     5,60
    978,1
     4,20
     1,29

      ,32
      ,91
    159,6
      .69
     6.03
    868,
    6,13
                     TEST WEIGHT  1077,  KG(  2375,  LBS)
                     ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5,1  KW(   6,8  HP)
                     DIESEL    EPA
                     ODOMETER  1914.  KM( 118?,  MILES)
                     NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR  1,00
HOT TRANSIENT

711,2 (28,0)
563,9 (22,2)
 38,3 (101,0)
   13747,
104,8 ( 3699.)
29,9/il/  30,
 3,0/ I/   3,
48.4/13/  45,
,49
,04
18,
29, 9/ 3/
 2,7/ 3/
17, 3/ 2/
 1,1/ 2/
    26,73
     27,
     44,
     ,45
    16,7
     1.63
     5,33
    871,0
     3,35
     1,57

      .29
      ,94
    153,9
      ,59
     5,31
    504,
    5,66
                                 CARBON DIOXIDE      G/KM
                                 FUEL  CONSUMPTION     L/100KM
                                 HYDROCARBONS  (THC)   G/KM
                                 CARBON MONOXIDE      G/K«
                                 OXIDES OF NITROGEN   G/KM
                                 PARTICULARS         G/KM
            STABILIZED
3-BAG
163,2
6.16
,33
,95
.64
.254
(4-BAG)
( 0,0)
( 0,00)
( 0,00)
( 0.00)
( 0.00)
( 0.000)

-------
  TEST NO,    EPA-2    RUN   1
  VEHICLE MODEL   80 VU RABBIT
  ENGINE 1,5 L( 90,  CID) L~4
  TRANSMISSION M5
  BAROMETER 740,16 MM HG(2?,14 IN MG)
  RELATIVE HUMIDITY  52,  PCT
0 BAG RESULTS
     TEST CYCLE

     BLOWER BIF P MM, H20(IN, H20)
     BLOWER INLET P MM, H20(IN,  H20)
     BLOWER INLET TEMP, DEG, C(BEG, F)
     BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
     TOT FLOU STD, CU, METRES(SCF)
         SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
         BCKGRD HETER/RANGE/PPM
         SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
         BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
         SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
HC
HC
CO
CO
C02
     C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
     NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
     NOX BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PPM
     DILUTION FACTOR
     HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
     CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
     C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
     NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
     NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
     HC  MASS GRAMS
     CO  MASS GRAMS
     C02 MASS GRAMS
     NOX MASS GRAMS
     PARTICULATE MASS GRAMS
     RUN TIME             SECONDS
          BFCf WET (DRY)
          SCF, WET (DRY)
          VOL (SCM)
          SAM BLR (SCM)
          KM  (MEASURED)

     TEST NUMBER?
     BAROMETER?           MM HG
     HUMIDITY?            G/KG
     TEMPERATURE?         DEG C
      CARBON DIOXIDE?      G/KM
     FUEL CONSUMPTION?    L/100KM

     HYDROCARBONS?        G/KM
     CARBON MONOXIDE?     G/KM
     OXIDES OF NITROGEN?  G/KM
FET    VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 11-5830-003

     VEHICLE MO.l
     DATE    7/17/80
     BAG CART NO,  1
     DYNO NO,      2
     CVS NO,   3

     DRY BULB TEMP, 24,4 DEG C(76,0 DEG  F)
     ABS, HUMIDITY 10,2 GM/KG

        FET

    716,3 (28,2)
    571,5 (22.5)
     38,3- (101,0)
       20935,
    202,6 ( 7155.)
    29,1/H/  29,
     2,6/ I/   3,
    52.1/13/  49,
,59
,04
21.
                                                                                          TEST  WEIGHT   1077,  KG(  2375,  LB3)
                                                                                          ACTUAL  ROAD  LOAD    5,1  KW(  6,8  HP)
                                                                                          DIESEL     EPA
                                                                                          ODOMETER   1938, KM(  1204, MILES)
                                                                                          NOX  HUMIDITY  CORRECTION FACTOR   ,98
    35, 3/ 3/
     2,6/ 3/
    21, 2/ 2/
     1,1/ 2/
        22,37
         27,
         47,
         ,55
                                                     20,1
                                                      3.11
                                                     11,17
                                                    2052,4
                                                      7*68
                                                      3,52
                                                     766,
                                                  ,955 (  .939)
                                                 1,000 (  ,978)
                                                    202.6
                                                    43.47
                                                    16,30

                                                   EPA-2
                                                    740.2
                                                     10.2
                                                     24.4
                                                     125,9
                                                     4,74

                                                      ,19
                                                      ,69
                                                      ,47

-------
                   TABLE B-l.  REGULATED EMISSIONS FROM 1980 VW RABBIT DIESEL 5-SPEED

HC , g/k.m
CO, g/km
NOX , gAm
Particulate, g/km
Fuel, A/100 km
FTP
(Avg)
vwa
0.65
2.38
1.69
—
6.14
(Avg)
EPA
0.85
2.06
1.63
0.578
5.88
SwRI
1
0.83
2.46
1.79
0.842
6.31
2
0.85
2.46
1.66
0.663
6.16
3b
0.85
2.41
1.63
0.553
.5.85
4c
0.73
2.46
1.75
0.653
6.16
FET
(Avg)
EPA
0.30
1.11
1.13
0.386
4.35
SwRI
1
0.47
1.87
1.24
0.553
5.05
2
0.49
1.79
1.216
0.560
4.74
3b
0.47
1.82
1.22
0.502
;4.58
4C
0.65
—
1.24
0.539
4.54
CO
     Fuel different than at EPA
     Dynamometer load suspect
    "Fuel different than at EPA, new load cell and calibration

-------
 TEST NO.   EPA-3    RUN   1
 VEHICLE: MODEL   so vw RABBIT
 ENGINE 1.5 L( 90. CID) L-4
 TRANSMISSION H5
 BAROMETER 744.98 MM HG(29,33 IN HG)
 RELATIVE HUMIDITY  34, PCT
 BAG RESULTS
    BAG NUMBER
    DESCRIPTION

    BLOWER DIF P MM. H20UN, H2C)
    BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN, H20)
    BLOWER INLET TEMP. BEG. C(DEG, F)
    BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
    TOT FLOW STD, CU, METRES(SCF)
        SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
        BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
        SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
        BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
  HC
  CO
  CO
  CQ2 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
w C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
i, NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
  NOX HCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
  DILUTION FACTOR
  HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
      CONCENTRATION PPM
      CONCENTRATION PCT
    CO
    C02
    NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
    HC  MASS GRAMS
    CO  MASS GRAMS
    C02 MASS GRAMS
    NOX MASS CRAMS

    HC  GRAMS/KM
    CO  GRAMS/KM
    C02 CRAMS/KM
    NOX GRAMS/KM
    FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/IOOKM
    RUN TIME             SECONDS
    MEASURED DISTANCE    KM

COMPOSITE RESULTS
    TEST NUMBER        EPA-3
    BAROMETER    MM HG  745.0
    HUMIDITY     0/KG     7,0
    TEMPERATURE  DEC C   25,6
                                               FTP    VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
                                                       PROJECT 11-5830-003

                                                    VEHICLE NO.l
                                                    DATE   10/ 3/80
                                                    BAG CART NO.  1
                                                    DYNO NO.      2
                                                    CVS NO,   3

                                                    DRY BULB TEMP, 25,6 DEC C(78.0 BEG F)
                                                    ABS, HUMIDITY  7.0 CM/KG
 7,
46.
,1,
.51
.03
20,
       1
COLD TRANSIENT

 708.7 (27,9)
 561,3 (22,1)
  34,4 ( 94,0)
    13845.
 107,1 ( 3782.)
 45,5/li/  46,
  7.0/ I/
 48.7/13/
  i.2/13/
 30. 6/ 3/
  2. I/ 3/
 19, 6/ 2/
   ,7/ 2/
     26,00
      39,
      44.
      ,48
     18,9
      2,40
      5,47
     932.6
      3.45

       ,43
       .97
     165.8
       ,61
      6,28
     504.
     5.62
  STABILIZED

711.2 (28,0)
561,3 (22,1)
 35,6 ( 96,0)
   23835.
183.9 ( 6495.)
25.8/il/  26.
 7.0/ I/   7.
31.4/13/  28,
 1.1/13/   1,
20,3/ 3/  .33
 3,0/ 3/  ,05
13,4/ 2/  13,
  ,7/ 2/   1,
    40.35
     19.
     27.
     .28
    12,7
     2.02
     5,80
    949,6
     3,98

      ,33
      ,96
    157,7
      .66
     5,96
    868.
    6.02
                                          TEST WEIGHT  1077.  KG(  2375.  LBS)
                                          ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5,1  KW(   6.8  HP)
                                          DIESEL    EPA
                                          ODOMETER  1986,  KM( 1234,  MILES)
                                          NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR    ,89
39,
 1,
.45
,05
18.
 1,
HOT TRANSIENT

708.7 (27.9)
561.3 (22,1)
 35.6 ( 96,0)
   13848.
106.9 ( 3774.)
29.8/1I/  30,
 7,0/ I/
42.1/13/
 l.i/13/
27.5/ 3/
 3.2/ 3/
18.3/ 2/
  ,6/ 2/
    29,25
     23,
     37,
     ,40
    17,7
     1,42
     4,65
    790,6
     3,22
                                                                                                 ,83
                                                                                               141,2
                                                                                                 ,58
                                                                                                5,33
                                                                                               504,
                                                                                               5,60
                                                                                CARBON DIOXIDE
                                                                                FUEL CONSUMPTION
                                                                                HYDROCARBONS (THC)
                                                                                CARBON MONOXIDE
                                                                                OXIDES OF NITROGEN
                                                                                                                 STABILIZED
G/KM
L/100KM
G/KM
G/KM
G/KM
3- BAG
154,8
5,05
,33
.93
.63
(4-BAG)
( 0.0)
( 0,00)
( 0,00)
( 0,00)
( 0,00)

-------
TEST NO,   EPA-3    RUN   1
VEHICLE HODEL   SO VU RABBIT
ENGINE 1.5 L( 90. CIB) L-A
TRANSMISSION M5
  BAROMETER 743,71 MM HG(29,28 IN HG)
  RELATIVE HUMIDITY  34,  PCT
0 BAG RESULTS
     TEST CYCLE

     BLOWER DIF P MM, H20(IN. H20)
     BLOWER INLET P MM, H20CIN.  H20)
     BLOWER INLET TEMP, DEG, C(DEG,  F)
     BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
     TOT FLOW STB, CU, METRES(SCF)
         SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
         BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PPM
         SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
         BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
     C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
     C02 BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PCT
     NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   HC
   HC
   CO
   CO
       BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PPM
to

03
     CO
     CO?
NOX
DILUTION FACTOR
HC   CONCENTRATION  PPM
     CONCENTRATION  PPM
     CONCENTRATION  PCT
NOX  CONCENTRATION  PPM
HC   MASS GRAMS
CO   MASS GRAMS
C02  MASS GRAMS
NOX  MASS GRAMS
RUN  TIME             SECONBS
     DFC, WET (BRY)
     SCF, WET 
-------
 TEST NO,   EPA4     RUN   1
 VEHICLE MODEL   30 VU RABBIT
 ENGINE 0,0 L(  0, CIIO L-4
 TRANSMISSION H5
 BAROMETER 741,93 MM HG<29.21 IN HG)
 RELATIVE HUMIDITY  50, PCT
 BAG RESULTS
    BAG NUMBER-
    DESCRIPTION
    BLOWER DIP P MM. H20(IN, H20>
    BLOWER INLET P MM, H20(IN, 1-120)
    BLOWER INLET TEMP, DEE. C(DEG, F)
    BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
    TOT PLOW STD, CU, METRES(SCF)
    HC  SAMPLE METER/RANCE/PPM
    HC  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
    CO  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PFM
    CO  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
    C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
    C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
    NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
    NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
    DILUTION FACTOR
    HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
    CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
    C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
    NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
    HC  MASS GRAMS
    CO  MASS GRAMS
    C02 MASS GRAMS
    NOX MASS GRAMS
    PARTICULATE MASS GRAMS
w
i
    HC  GRAMS/KM
    CO  GRAMS/KM
    C02 GRAMS/KM
    NOX GRAMS/KM
    FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/iOOKM
    RUN TIME
    MEASURED DISTANCE    KM

COMPOSITE RESULTS
    TEST NUMBER        EPA4
    BAROMETER    MM HG  741,9
    HUMIDITY     G/KG    10,4
    TEMPERATURE  DEG C   25,6
                                                 FTP     VEHICLE  EMISSIONS RESULTS
                                                         PROJECT 11-5830-006

                                                      VEHICLE NO.l
                                                      DATE    10/10/80
                                                      BAG CART NO,  1
                                                      DYNO NO,      2
                                                      CVS NO,    3

                                                      DRY BULB TEMP, 25,6 DEG C(7Q,0 DEG F)
                                                      ABS, HUMIDITY 10,4 GM/KG
       1
COLD TRANSIENT

 708,7 (27,9)
 566,4 (22,3)
  36,1 ( 97,0)
    13854,
 106,3 ( 3752.)
 33,7/il/  34,
  7,8/ I/   8,
 54,1/13/  51.
  2.2/13/   2,
 34,O/ 3/  ,57
  3,S/ 3/  ,06
 13,3/ 2/  18,
   ,7/ 2/   1,
     23,27
      26,
      48,
      ,51
     17,6
      1,61
      5,97
     995,7
      3,55
      1,78

       ,28
      1,04
     173,3
       ,62
      6.54
     505,
     5,74
   STABILIZED

 708,7 (27,9)
'566,4 (22,3)
  35,0 (  95,0)
    23322,
 183,1 (  6467.)
 22,0/il/  22,
  5,9/ I/   6,
 31.2/13/  23,
  2.1/13/   2,
 22,2/ 3/  .36
  3,6/ 3/  ,06
 13,?/ 2/  14,
   ,7/ 2/   1,
     36,30
      16,
      26,
      ,31
     13,2
      1,72
      5,52
    1024,4
      4,58
      1,39

       .28
       ,89
     165.9
       ,74
      6.25
     867.
     6,18
                                          TEST WEIGHT  1077,  KG(  2375,  LBS)
                                          ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5.1  KW(   6,8 HP)
                                          DIESEL    EM-339-F
                                          ODOMETER  2041,  KM(  1263,  MILES)
                                          NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION  FACTOR    ,99
HOT TRANSIENT

708,7 (27,9)
566,4 (22,3)
 36,1 (  97,0)
   13343,
106,2 (  3751.)
32,1/H/  32,
 5,9/ I/   6,
58,4/13/  56,
10.5/13/   9,
30,O/ 3/  ,50
 3,5/ 3/  ,05
17.7/ 2/  18,
  .6/ 2/   1,
    26.57
     26.
     46.
     .44
    17.1
     1.62
     5.67
    863.6
     3.44
     1,50

      .28
      ,99
    150.8
      ,60
     5,70
    504,
    5,73
                                                                                 CARBON DIOXIDE      G/KM
                                                                                 FUEL CONSUMPTION    L/IOOKM
                                                                                 HYDROCARBONS (THC)  G/KM
                                                                                 CARBON MONOXIDE     G/KM
                                                                                 OXIDES OF NITROGEN  G/KM
                                                                                 PARTICULATES        G/KM
                                                                                                                  STABILIZED
3-BAG
163,3
6,16
,28
,95
,60
,252
(4-BAG)
( 0,0)
( 0,00)
( 0,00)
( 0,00)
( 0,00)
( 0,000)

-------
TEST NO,   EPA2     RUN   1
VEHICLE MODEL   80 VU RABBIT
ENGINE 0,0 L(  0, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M5
  BAROMETER 741.93 MM HG(29,21 IN HG)
  RELATIVE HUMIDITY  50, PCT
0 BAG RESULTS
     TEST CYCLE

     BLOWER BIF P MM, H20(IN. H20)
     BLOWER INLET P MM, K20(IN, H20)
     BLOWER INLET TEMP, DEG, C(DEG, F)
     BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
     TOT FLOW STD, CU, METRES(SCF)
     HC  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
     HC  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
     CO  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
     CO  BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PPM
     C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
     C02 BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PCT
     NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
     NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
 M   DILUTION FACTOR
 7   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
 M   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
 0   C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
     NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
     HC  MASS GRAMS
     CO  MASS GRAMS
     C02 MASS GRAMS
     NOX MASS GRAMS
     RUN TIME             SECONDS
          DFC*  WET (DRY)
          SCFx  WET (DRY)
          VOL (SCM)
          SAM BLR (SCM)
          KM  (MEASURED)

     TEST NUMBER*
     BAROMETER/            MM HG
     HUMIDITY*             G/KG
     TEMPERATURE*          DEG C
     CARBON DIOXIDE*       G/KM
     FUEL CONSUMPTION,     L/100KM

     HYDROCARBONS*         G/KM
     CARBON  MONOXIDEF      G/KM
     OXIDES  OF  NITROGEN*  G/KM
FET    VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 11-5830-006

     VEHICLE NO.l
     BATE   10/10/80
     BAG CART NO,  1
     DYNO NO,       2
     CVS NO,    3

     DRY BULB TEMP,  25,6 DEG  C(78,0  DEG F)
     ABS,  HUMIDITY  10,4  GM/KG

        FET

    713,7 (23,1)
    581.7 (22,9)
     39,4 (103,0)
       21024,
    203,6 ( 7183.)
    40,3/il/   40,
     5,6/ I/    6,
    77,7/13/   77,
    16.0/13/   14,
    34,3/ 3/   ,57
     3,I/ 3/   ,05
    21,2/ 2/   21,
      .6/ 2/    1,
        22,92 :'
         35,
         62,
         ,53
        20,6
         4,10
        14,67
       1966.4
         7,94
        766,
     ,956  ( ,941)
    1.000  ( ,979)
       203,6
       43,99
       16,41

      EPA2
       741,9
        10,4
        25,6
        119.8
        4,54

         ,25

         ,48
                                                                                               TEST  WEIGHT   1077,  KG(  2375, LBS)
                                                                                               ACTUAL  ROAD  LOAD    5,1  KW(  6,8 HP)
                                                                                               DIESEL     EM-329-F
                                                                                               ODOMETER   2041, KM(  1268, MILES)
                                                                                            NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR    .99

-------
                     TABLE B-2.  COMPARISON OF AVERAGE OR TYPICAL REGULATED EMISSIONS
                           FROM CURRENT TESTS TO THOSE FROM CONTRACT 68-03-2440a
Operating Sequence
Program
HC, gAm

CO, g.km
NOX , gAm
Particulate , gAme
Fuel, VlOO km
FTP
Earlier
0.52

1.32
1.69
0.563
5.60
Current
0.81

2.48
1.59
0.644
6.38
HFET
Earlier
0.26

0.98
1.48
0.370
4.52
Current
0.90

2.61
1.58
0.644
5.16
IDLE
Earlier
6.48b

12. 5b
4.89:?
3.41°
—
Current
2.13*

9.30*

0.70*
—
50 kph
Earlier
0.18

0.60
0.89
0.177
3.55
Current
0.42

1.38
1.35
0.451
4. .76
85 kph
Earlier
0.26

0.93
0.87
0.386
4.38
Current
1.014

3.089
1.738
0.724
5.20
td
i
^"National Average" fuels in both case - EM-329-F (current)  and EM-239-F (earlier)
 g/hr instead of g/mi
dTypical
 Single value
 Earlier particulate based on 47 mm glass fiber filters;  current particulate based on 47 mm
 Pallflex filters

-------
TABLE B-3.  PROPERTIES  OF  COAL-DERIVED LIQUIDS USED AS BLENDING COMPONENTS
Fuel Code
Fuel Description
Gravity, "API
Specific Gravity
Distillation, D-86, °F
IBP
5
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
95
EP
Recovery, %
Aromatics
Olefins D-1319
Paraffins
Carbon, wt. %
Hydrogen, wt. %
Nitrogen, wt. %
Oxygen, wt. %
Sulfur, Wt. %
Viscosity, cs @ 100 °F,
D-445
Gum, mg/100 mfc, D-481
Cetane Number, D613
EM-472-F
SRC-II
Middle Distillate
14.3
0.970

353
327
396
411
423
435
446
457
471
485
501
518
566
99.0
88.3
0.6
11.0
86.2
8.6
0.83
3.9
0.27

3.68
156.9
16
EM- 4 80 -F
EDS
Middle Distillate
18.6
0.943

408
428
433
447
458
476
500
526
556
592
660
	
	
94.0
83.7
0.0
16. 3
88.6
10.7
0.08
—
0.01

3.30
228.6
23
EM.-481-F
EDS Naphtha
43.1
0.810

186
228
238
256
271
284
298
312
324
336
348
358
394
99.5
25.9
1.5
72.6
85.2
13.1
0.05
__
0.45

— —
59.4
25
                                  B-12

-------
      APPENDIX C





GASEOUS EMISSIONS DATA

-------
  TEST NO,    329FTP   RUN   1
  VEHICLE MODEL   GO VU RABBIT
  ENGINE 1,5 L( 90. CID)  L-4
  TRANSMISSION M4

  BAROMETER 736,85 MM h'G(29,01  IN  MG)
  RELATIVE HUMIDITY  46,  PCT
  BAG RESULTS
     BAG NUMBER
     DESCRIPTION

     BLOWER DIP P MM,  H20(IN.  H20)
     BLOWER INLET P MM, H20(IN,  H20)
     BLOWER INLET TEMP, DEC, C(DEG, F>
     BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
     TOT FLOW STD,  CU,  METRES(SCF)
     HC  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
     KC  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
     CO  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
     CO  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
     C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
     C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
     NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
  n  NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
  ^  DILUTION FACTOR
     HC  CONCENTRATION  PPM
     CO  CONCENTRATION  PPM
     C02 CONCENTRATION  PCT
     NOX CONCENTRATION  PPM
     HC  MASS GRAMS
     CO  MASS GRAMS
     C02 MASS GRAMS
     NOX MASS GRAMS
     PARTICULATE MASS GRAMS

     HC  GRAMS/KM
     CO  GRAMS/KM
     C02 GRAMS/KM
     NOX GRAMS/KM
     FUEL CONSUMPTION BY  CE  L/iOOKM

     RUN TIME             SECONDS
     MEASURED  DISTANCE    KM
     SCFf DRY
         DFC,  WET  (DRY)
         SCF,  WET  (DRY)
         VOL  (SCM)
         SAM BLR (SCM)
         KM   (MEASURED)
         FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM

COMPOSITE RESULTS
    TEST NUMBER        329FTP
    BAROMETER    MM KG  736,9
    HUMIDITY     G/KG     9,8
    TEMPERATURE  DEG C   25,6
FTP    VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 11-5830-003

     VEHICLE NO.i
     DATE   12/ 0/80
     BAG CART NO, 1  / CVS NO,   3
     DYNO NO,    ,  2

     DRY BULB TEMP,  25,6 DEG C(78,0 DEG  F)
     ABS, HUMIDITY  9*8 CM/KG
TEST WEIGHT  1021, KG( 2250,  LBS)
ACTUAL, ROAD LOAD   5,4 KU<  7,3 HP)
DIESEL    EM-329-F
ODOMETER  2176,  KM( 1352, MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR   ,97
1
:OLD TRANSIENT
711,2 (28, Q)
558,0 (22,0)
38,9 (102,0)
13879,
135,0 ( 4766,)
33. A/11/ 34,
7,0/ I/ 7,
49,2/13/ 46,
5.4/13/ 5,
28, 5/ 3/ ,47
3,2/ 3/ ,05
15, O/ 2/ 15,
,3/ 2/ 0,
28,10
27,
41,
,42
14,7
2,09
6,38
1042,3
3,69
1,76
,36
1,11
181,2
,64
7,00 ,
505, t
5,75 
-------
TEST NO,   329FET   RUN   1
VEHICLE MODEL   80 VU RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L< 90, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4


BAROMETER 736,85 MM HG<29,01 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  46, PCT
BAG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE

   BLOWER BIF P MM, H20(IN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET F MM, H20(IN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP, BEG. C(BEG, F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   TOT FLOW STB, CU. METRES(SCF)
   HC  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   HC  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
   C02 BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PCT
   NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   DILUTION FACTOR
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
   HC  MASS GRAMS
   CO  MASS GRAMS
   C02 MASS GRAMS
   NOX MASS GRAMS
   PARTICULATE MASS GRAMS
   RUN TIME             SECONDS
        DFCy UET (DRY)
        SCF, WET (DRY)
        VOL  (SCM)
        SAM BLR  (SCM)
        KM   (MEASURED)

   TEST NUMBER,
   BAROMETER*           MM HG
   HUMIDITYy            G/KG
   TEMPERATUREy         DEO C
    CARBON DIOXIDEt      G/KM
   FUEL CONSUMPTION*    L/100KM

   HYDROCARBONS,        G/KM
   CARBON MONOXIDE*     G/KM
   OXIDES OF NITROGEN?  G/KM
n

U)
HFET   VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 11-5830-003

     VEHICLE NO.l.
     DATE   12/ 8/80
     BAG CART NO.  1
     DYNO NO,      2
     CVG NO,   3

     DRY BULB TEMP, 25,6 BEG C(78,0 BEG F)
     ABS. HUMIDITY  9,8 CM/KG

        HFET

    711,2 (28,0)
    569.0 (22,4)
     37,8 (100,0) '
       21013,
    204.4 ( 7219.)
    52,4/H/  52,
     4,8/ I/   5,
    73.1/13/  72,
     2.0/13/   2,
    36,7/ 3/  ,62
     3.0/ 3/  .05
    26,O/ 2/  26,
      ,!/ ?./   0,
        21,30
         48,
         68,
         .57
        25,9
         5,64
        16,16
       2144,8
         9,84
         4,06
        765,
     .953 <  ,939)
    1,000 (  ,979)
       204,4
       43,55
       16,53

      329FET
       736,9
         9,8
        25,6
        129,7
        5,03     :

         ,34
         ,98
         .60
                                                                                              TEST WEIGHT  1021, KG( 2250, LBS)
                                                                                              ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5,4 KW(  7.3 HP)
                                                                                              DIESEL    EM-329--F
                                                                                              ODOMETER  2202, KM( 1368, MILES)
                                                                                              NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR   .97

-------
TEST NO.   329FTP   RUN   2
VEHICLE MODEL   SO VU RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4

BAROMETER 743,20 MM HG(29,26 IN HG>
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  31, PCT
PAG RESULTS
   BAG NUMBER
   DESCRIPTION

   BLOWER DIP P MM. H20UN, H20>
   BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN, 1-120)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP, DEO. C(DEG,  F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   TOT FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
   HC  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   HC  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
   C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
   NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   DILUTION FACTOR
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
   HC  MASS GRAMS
   CO  MASS GRAMS
   C02 MASS GRAMS
   NOX MASS GRAMS
   PARTICIPATE MASS GRAMS

   HC  GRAMS/KM
   CO  GRAMS/KM
   C02 GRAMS/KM
   NOX GRAMS/KM
   FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
 ?
                        SECONDS
                        KM
    RUN TIME
    MEASURED DISTANCE
    SCF* DRY
         BFC» WET   WET  (DRY)
         VOL (SCM)
         SAM BLR (SCM)
         KM  (MEASURED)
         FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM

COMPOSITE RESULTS
    TEST NUMBER        329FTP
    BAROMETER    MM HG  743.2
    HUMIDITY     G/KG     6.4
    TEMPERATURE  DEC C   25.6
FTP    VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 11-5830-003

     VEHICLE NO.l
     DATE   12/ 9/80
     BAG CART NO, 1 / CVS NO,   3
     DYNO NO,   "2

     DRY BULB TEMP. 25,6 DEC C(78.0 DEC F)
     ADS, HUMIDITY  6,4 GM/KG
                                                                                              TEST WEIGHT  1021, KG( 2250, LBS)
                                                                                              ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5,4 KU<  7,3 HP)
                                                                                              DIESEL    EM-329-F
                                                                                              ODOMETER  22.18, KM( 1378. MILES)
                                                                                              NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR   .130
1
:OLD TRANSIENT
711,2 (28,0)
561,3 (22,1)
35,0 ( 95,0)
13S70,
137,4 ( 4853,)
38.1/11/ 33,
5,3/ I/ 5,
53.4/13/ 51,
2.9/13/ 3.
28, O/ 3/ ,46
3,2/ 3/ ,05
16, I/ 2/ 16,
,6/ 2/ 1,
28,57
33,
47,
,41
15,5
2,61
7,55
1038,9
3,57
1,92
.45
1.29
177.2
,61
6,87
505,
5,06
.986
,974
1,000






2
STABILIZED
711,2 (28.0)
561,3 (22,1)
32.2 ( 90,0)
23814.
237,3 ( 8378.)
17,6/H/ 18.
6,0/ I/ 6,
24. 5/1 3/ 22.
2.7/13/ 2,
17. 7/ 3/ .28
3,0/ 3/ ,05
10, I/ 2/ 10,
,6/ 2/ 1.
46,73
12,
20,
,24
9,5
1,60
5,44
1033,4
3,70
1,26
.25
,86
163,0
,60
6,31
068,
6.31
,987
( ,964)
( ,987)
374,7
80,61
12,17
6,58

CARBON
3
HOT TRANSIENT
711,2 (28,0)
561,3 (22,1)
35,0 ( 95,0)
13856.
137.3 ( 4848.)
30,9/U/ 31.
6.0/ I/ 6,
47.9/13/ 45.
5.2/13/ 5,
25. 3/ 3/ ,41
3,4/ 3/ ,05
15, 5/ 2/ 16.
,5/ 2/ 1.
31,08
25,
40.
.36
15.0
1,98
6,35
910,9
3.45
1.71
,34
1,10
157.6
,60
6.10
505,
5,78
,986
,975 <
1.000 (





DIOXIDE G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS (THC) G/KM


CARBON
OXIDES
MONOXIDE G/K«
OF NITROGEN G/Krt
PARTICIPATES G/KM
4
STABILIZED
711.2 (28,0)
561.3 (22,1)
32,8 (91.0)
23819.
237,1 ( 8370,)
17,2/il/ 17,
5,0/ I/ 5,
25.8/13/ 24,
4.7/13/ 4,
17, 6/ 3/ ,28
3, I/ 3/ ,05
10. O/ 2/ 10,
,5/ 2/ 1,
46.99
12.
19,
,23
9.5
1.68
5.28
1018.6
3.70
0.00
.26
,83
160,3
,59
6.17
868.
6,36
.987
,965)
.987)
374.4
80.55
12.14
6.14
3-BAG (4-BAG)
164,9 ( 163.8)
6,37 ( 6.33)
.32 ( ,32)
1.01 ( 1.01)
.60 ( .60)
.252 ( O.QQO)

-------
TEST NO,   329FET   RUN   2
VEHICLE MODEL   80 VU RABBIT
ENGINE 1.5 L< 90, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 743,46 MM HG(29.27 IN H6)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  31, PCT
BAG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE
   BLOWER DIF P MM. H20(IN. H20)
   BLOWER INLET P MM, H20UN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP, DEG, C
     ADS, HUMIDITY  6,4 GM/KG

        HFET

    711.2 (28.0)
    561,3 (22,1)
     40,6 (105.0)
       21014,
    205,3 (  7248,)
    54,6/11/  55,
     5,2/ I/   5,
    77.7/13/  77,
     2,8/13/   3,
    37.A/ 3/  ,63
     3.2/ 3/  ,05
    29,3/ 2/  29,
      ,5/ 2/   1,
        20,73
         50,
         73,
         ,59
        20,8
         5,87
        17.33
       2205,0
         9,91
         4,26
        765,
     .952 (  ,942)
    1,000 (  ,984)
       205,3
       44,03
       16,61

      329FET
       743,5
         6,4
        25,6
        132,8
        5,15
                                                        1,04
                                                          ,60
                                                                                             TEST WEIGHT  1021. KG( 2250, LBS)
                                                                                             ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5,4 KU(  7,3 HP)
                                                                                             DIESEL    EM-329-F
                                                                                             ODOMETCR  2243, KM( 1394, MILES)
                                                                                             NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR   ,88

-------
 TEST NO,   329FTP   RUN   3
 VEHICLE MODEL   80 VW RABBIT
 ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, CID) L-4
 TRANSMISSION M4

 BAROMETER 751,08 MM MG(29.57 IN HG)
 RELATIVE HUMIDITY  22, PCT
 DAG RESULTS
    BAG NUMBER
    DESCRIPTION

    BLOWER DIF P MM, H20(IN,  H20)
    BLOWER INLET P MM, H20(IN, H20)
    BLOWER INLET TEMP, DEG, C(DEG,  F)
    BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
    TOT FLOW STD, CU, METRES(SCF)
    HC  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
    HC  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
    CO  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
    CO  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
    C02 SAMPLE METER7RANGE/PCT
    C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
    NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
    NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
 ?  DILUTION FACTOR
 en  HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
    CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
    C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
    NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
    HC  MASS GRAMS
    CO  MASS GRAMS
    C02 MASS GRAMS
    NOX MASS GRAMS
    PARTICULATE MASS GRAMS

    HC  GRAMS/KM
    CO  GRAMS/KM
    C02 GRAMS/KM
    NOX GRAMS/KM
    FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CD L/100KM

    RUN TIME             SECONDS
    MEASURED DISTANCE    KM
    SCFr  DRY
         DFC,  WET (DRY)
         SCF,  WET (DRY)
         VOL (SCM)
         SAM BLR  (SCM)
         KM   (MEASURED)
         FUEL  CONSUMPTION  L/100KM

OMPOSITE RESULTS
   TEST  NUMBER         329FTP
   BAROMETER     MM  HG   751.1
   HUMIDITY     G/KG     4.5
   TEMPERATURE   DEG C   25.6
FTP    VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 11-5830-003

     VEHICLE NO,
     BATE   12/10/80
     BAG CART ND..1 / CVS NO,   3
     DYNO NO.      2

     DRY BULB TEMP, 25,6 DEG C(78,0 DEG  F)
     ABS, HUMIDITY  4,5 GM/KG
TEST WEIGHT  1021,  KG( 2250,  LDS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5,4 KU(  7,3 HP)
DIESEL    EM-329-F
ODOMETER  2260,  KM( 1404,  MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR
,83
1
lOLD TRANSIENT
711,2 (23.0)
574.0 (22,6)
36,1 ( 97,0)
13745,
137,1 ( 4840.)
34,17117 34,
5,07 I/ 5,
52.3/13/ 50,
3.9/13/ 4,
27, 6/ 3/ ,45
3,3/ 37 ,05
16,77 27 17,
,7/ 2/ 1.
29,04
29,
45,
.40
16.0
2,31
7,24
1014,6
3.48
1.92
,41
1,27
178,4
.61
6,91
501,
5,69
,989
,974
1,000






2
STABILIZED
721,4 (28.4)
531.7 (22.9)
32.2 ( 90,0)
23797,
238,8 ( 8434.)
15.1/11/ 15.
4.4/ I/ 4,
23.8/13/ 22,
4,9/13/ 4,
17, 5/ 3/ ,28
3,0/ 3/ ,05
10, 6/ 2/ 11,
,6/ 2/ 1,
47,33
11,
17.
,23
10,0
1,48
4,78
1025.5
3,79
1,27
,24
.77
166,1
,61
6,39
868,
6,17
,990
( ,967)
( .990)
375,9
80,34
11,86
6,64

CARBON
3
HOT TRANSIENT
713,7 (28,1)
581,7 (22,9)
35,0 ( 95.0)
13875,
138,5 ( 4890.)
25,1/il/ 25,
4,4/ I/ 4,
40.6/13/ 38,
2.7/13/ 2,
24,17 3/ ,39
3,0/ 3/ ,05
15, 9/ 2/ 16.
,6/ 2/ 1,
33,65
21,
35,
,35
15,3
1,66
5,63
880,8
3,37
1,59
,29
,98
153,8
.59
5,94
506,
5.73
,989
.976 (
1,000 (





DIOXIDE G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS (THC) G/KM


CARBON
OXIDES
MONOXIDE G/KM
OF NITROGEN 0/KH
PARTICULARS G/KM
4
STABILIZED
713,7 (28,1)
581,7 (22,9)
32,2 ( 90,0)
23788,
238.7 ( 8430.)
13.8711/ 14,
4,5/ I/ 5,
20.5/13/ 19,
2.3/13/ 2,
17, O/ 3/ ,27
2,8/ 3/ ,04
10, 9/ 2/ 11.
,6/ 2/ 1,
48,85
9,
16,
,23
10,3
1,29
4,56
1001,6
3,91
0,00
,21
,74
161,9
,63
6,22
867,
6,18
,990
,969)
,990)
377,2
80,54
11,91
6,09
3-BAD (4-BAG)
165.3 ( 164,0)
6,37 ( 6,32)
.29 < ,28)
• 93 ( ,92)
•61 < .61)
.253 ( O.OOO)

-------
TEST NO,   329FET   RUN   3
VEHICLE MODEL   80 VU RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 750,82 MM HG(29,56 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  19, PCT
BAG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE
   BLOWER BIF P MM, M20(IN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET P MM, H20(IN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP, BEG, C
   BAROMETER?           MM HG
   HUMIDITY?            G/KG
   TEMPERATUREy         DEG C
    CARBON DIOXIDEy      G/KM
   FUEL CONSUMPTION?    L/100KM

   HYDROCARBONS,        G/KM
   CARBON MONOXIDE*     G/KM
   OXIDES OF NITROGEN?  G/KM
HFET   VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 11 --5830- 003

     VEHICLE NO...
     DATE   12/10/00
     BAG CART NO,  1
     DYNO NO,      2
     CVS NO,   3

     BRY BULB TEMP, 25.6 BEG C(78,0 BEG F)
     ABS, HUMIDITY  3,9 GM/KG

        HFET

    711.2 (28,0)
    581,7 (22,9)
     39,4 (103.0)
       21018,
    208,0 (  7344.)
    46,6/H/  47,
     4,?/ I/
    71.3/13/
     2.1/13/
    36, I/ 3/
     2,8/ 3/
    30, O/ 2/
       ,7/ 2/
        21,71
         42,
         67,
         ,56
        29,3
         5,03
        16,11
       2151,3
         9,53
          ,85
                                                                                             TEST WEIGHT  1021,  KG(  2250.  LBS)
                                                                                             ACTUAL  ROAD LOAD   5.4  KM(   7,3 HP)
                                                                                             DIESEL     EM-329-F
                                                                                             ODOMETER  2232,  KM( 1418. MILES)
                                                                                             NQX HUMIDITY  CORRECTION FACTOR    ,82
                                                               5,
                                                              70,
                                                               2,
                                                              ,61
                                                              ,04
                                                              30,
                                                     .954 (  ,948)
                                                    1,000 (  ,980)
                                                       208.0
                                                       44,84
                                                       16,18    '"

                                                      329FET
                                                       750.8
                                                         3,9
                                                        25,6
                                                        132,9
                                                        5,15    :

                                                         ,31
                                                        1,00
                                                         ,59

-------
TEST NO,   329SOO   RUN   1
VEHICLE MODEL   80 VU RABBIT
ENGINE 1.5 L( 90, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4


BAROMETER 748,79 MM HG(29,48 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  29, PCT
BAG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE

   BLOWER DIF P MM, H20(IN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET P MM, H20(IN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP, BEG, C(DEG. F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   TOT FLOW STD, CU, METRES(SCF)
   HC  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   HC  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
   C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
   NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
o  NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
i   DILUTION FACTOR
00  HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
   HC  MASS GRAMS
   CO  MASS GRAMS
   C02 MASS GRAMS
   NOX MASS GRAMS
   PARTICULATE MASS GRAMS
   RUN TIME             SECONDS
        DFC»  WET (DRY)
        SCFf  WET (DRY)
        VOL (SCM)
        SAM BLR (SCM)
        KM  (MEASURED)

   TEST NUMBERf
   BAROMETER*            MM HG
   HUMIDITYf             G/KG
   TEMPERATURE?          DEG C
    CARBON DIOXIDE,       G/KM
   FUEL CONSUMPTION*     L/100KM

   HYDROCARBONS,         G/KM
   CARBON  MONOXIDE*      G/KM
   OXIDES  OF NITROGEN;   G/KM
0 KPI-!  VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 11-5830-003

     VEHICLE NO,  ,
     DATE   12/11/80
     BAG CART NO,  1
     DYNO NO,      2
     CVS NO,   3

     DRY BULB TEMP. 22,0 DEC C(73,0 DEG F)
     ABS, HUMIDITY  5,1  GM/KG

        0 KP

    716,3 (28.2)
    571,5 (22,5)
     37,8 (100,0)
       32923,
    325,5 (11494.)
    11,7/li/  12.
     7.5/ I/   8,
    12.0/13/  11,
     2.9/13/   3,
     7,I/ 3/  ,11
     3,0/ 3/  ,05
     4,3/ 2/   4,
      ,6/ 21   1,
       119,39
          4,
          8,
         ,06
         3,7
          ,00
         3.09
        384,3
         !• 95
          ,22
       1200,
     ,992 (  ,982)
    1,000 (  ,990)
       325,5
       71,06
        5,00

      329SOO
       748,8
         5,1
        22,8
         76,9
        2,98     :

         ,16
         .62
         ,39
TEST WEIGHT  1021, KG( 2250,  LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5,4 KU(  7,3 HP)
DIESEL    EM-329-F
ODOMETER  2311, KM< 1436, MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR   ,84

-------
TEST NO,   329S50   RUN   1
VEHICLE KODEL   00 VU RABBI"
ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, CUD L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 748;79 MM
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  ;
BnG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE
             HG(29,48
             5*  PCT
IN f-IG)
o
   BLOWER DIP P MM, H20(IN, H2Q)
   BLOWER INLET P MM, H20(IN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP, DEC. C(DEG, F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   TOT
   HC
   I-IC
   CO
   CO
   CO 2
   C02
   NOX
   NOX
FLOW STD. CU, METRES(SCF)
SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
       METER/RANGE/PPM
       METER/RANCE/PPM
       METER/RANGE/PCT
       METER/RANGE/PCT
       METER/RANGE/PPM
       METER/RANGE/PPM
              PPM
              PPM
              PCT
              PPM
    SAMPLE
    BCKGRB
    SAMPLE
    BCKGRD
    SAMPLE
    BCKGRD
DILUTION FACTOR
HC  CONCENTRATION
CO  CONCENTRATION
C02 CONCENTRATION
NOX CONCENTRATION
HC  MASS GRAMS
CO  MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
PfiRTICULATE MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME
     )JFC» WET (DRY)
     :;CFy WET (DRY)
     VOL (CCM)
     SAM BLR (SCM)
     KM  (MEASURED)

TEST NUMBERr
BAROMETERr           MM HG
HUMIDITY?            G/KG
TEMPERATURE?         DEG C
 CARBON DIOXIBEr      G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION?    L/100KM

HYDROCARBONSt        G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE*     G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN?  G/KM
                                             50 KPH VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
                                                     PROJECT 11-5830-003

                                                  VEHICLE NO,
                                                  BATE   12/11/80
                                                  BAG CART NO,   1
                                                  BYNO NO,   -'2
                                                  CVS NO,   3

                                                  DRY BULB TEMP,  24,4 BEG C(76,0 BEG  F)
                                       6,7  GM/KG
                                                                                      TEST  WEIGHT   1021,  KG(  2250,  LBS)
                                                                                      ACTUAL  ROAB  LOAB    5.4  KM<   7,3 HP)
                                                                                      DIESEL     EM-329-F
                                                                                      ODOMETER   2303, KM<  1431,  MILES)
                                                                                          NOX  HUMIDITY CORRECTION  FACTOR    ,88
                                 27,
                                  2,
                                 ,39
                                 ,05
                                 17,
                                  1,
    50 K

716,3 (28,2)
571,5 (22,5)
 35,0 (  95,0)
   16474,
163,3 (  5767.)
20,1/il/  20,
 5.0/ I/   5,
29.4/13/
 2.2/13/
24,2/ 3/
 3,3/ 3/
16.6/ 2/
   ,5/ 2/
    33,64
     15,
     25,
     ,34
    16,1
     1,43
     4,60
   1030,6
     4,45
     1,44
    600,
 ,970 (
1,000 (
   163.3
   35,37
    0,31

  329S50
   748,8
     6,7
    24,4
    124,0
    4,77

     ,17
     ,56
     ,54
                                                            ,959)
                                                            ,985)

-------
TEST NO,    329S85   RUN   1
VEHICLE MODEL   80 VU RABBIT
ENGINE 1.5 L( 90, CID) L~4
TKANShlSSION M
BAROMETER 74G,?9 MM HG(29,48 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  30, PCT
BA!": RESULTS
   fEST CYCLE
?
   M.GWER
          DIP  P
          INLET
          INLET
              rtM,  H2CKIN,  H20)
              P MM,  H20(IN, H20)
              TEMP,  DEG,  C(DEG, F)
   HLOWER REVOLUT
   FOT
   HC
   HC
   CO
   CO
   CQ2
   C02
   NOX
   NCX
       FLOW STD, CU, METRES (SCF)
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PCT
              METER/RANGE/PCT
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO
   CO 2
   NOX
   HC
   CO
   CQ2
   NO*
    SAMPLE
    BCKCRD
    SAMPLE
    BCKGRD
    SAMPLE
    BCKGRD
    SAMPLE
    BCKGRD
DILUTION FACTOR
HC  CONCENTRATION  PPM
    CONCENTRATION  PPM
    CONCENTRATION  PCT
    CONCENTRATION  PPM
    MASS GRAMS
    MASS GRAMS
    MASS GRAMS
    MASS GRAMS
PARTICULATE MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME             SECONDS
     DFCy WET (DRY)
     SCF» WET (DRY)
     VOL (SCM)
     SAM BLR (SCM)
     KM  (MEASURED)

TEST NUMBERS'
BAROMETER?           MM HG
HUMIDITY?            G/KG
TEMPERATURE 7         DEG C
 CARBON DIOXIDEi      G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION*    L/100KM

HYDROCARBONS,         G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDEy     G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN/  G/KN
85 KPH VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 11-5830-003

     VEHICLE NO,
     DATE   12/11/80
     BAG CART NO,   1
     DYNO NO,   >   2
     CVS NO,   3

     DRY BULB TEMP, 23,3 DEG C(74,0 DEG F)
     ABS, HUMIDITY  5,4 GM/KG

        85 K

    716,3 (28,2)
    571,5 (22,5)
     40,6 (105,0)
       16465,
    161,4 (  5698,)
    77,2/il/  77,
     5,0/ I/   5,
    48,5/12/ 102,
      ,7/12/   1,
    40,I/ 3/  ,68
     2.9/ 3/  ,04
    37,O/ 2/  37,
      ,5/ 2/   1,
        19,22
         72,
         99,
         ,64
        36,5
         6,74
        18,54
       1883,5
         9,60
         1,32
        600,
     ,948 (  ,939)
    1,000 (  ,984)
       161,4
       35,19
       14,32

      329S85
       748,8
         5.4
        23,3
        131,5
        5,13

         ,47
        1,29
         ,67
                                                                                            TEST WEIGHT  1021. KG( 2250, LBS)
                                                                                            ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5,4 KW(  7,3 HP)
                                                                                            DIESEL    EM-329-F
                                                                                            ODOMETER  2321, KM< 1442, MILES)
                                                                                            NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR   ,85

-------
TEST NO,   329SOO   RUN   2
VEHICLE MODEL   80 VW RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, CID) L--4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 745,24 MM HG<29,34 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  27, PCT
BAG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE
   BLOWER BIF P MM, H2CKIN. H20)
   BLOWER INLET P MM, H2D(IN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP, BEG, C(BEG., F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   TOT FLOW STB, CD, METRES(SCF)
   HC  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/FPM
   HC  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
   C02 BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PCT
   NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   NOX BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PPM
   DILUTION FACTOR
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
       MASS GRAMS
n
   HC
   CO
       MASS GRAMS
   C02 MASS GRAMS
   NOX MASS GRAMS
   PARTICULATE  MASS  GRAMS
   RUN TIME
         BFC,  WET  (DRY)
         SCF>  WET  (DRY)
         VOL (SCM)
         SAM BLR (SCM)
         KM  (MEASURED)
                        SECONDS
   TEST NUMBER>
   BAROMETERy
   HUMIDITY,
   TEMPERATUREy
    CARBON DIOXIDE,
   FUEL CONSUMPTION?
                        MM  HG
                        G/KG
                        BEG C
                         G/KM
                        L/iOOKM
   HYDROCARBONS*        G/KM
   CARBON MONOXIDE*     G/KM
   OXIDES OF NITROGEN*  G/KM
                                                0 KPH  VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
                                                        PROJECT 11-5030-003

                                                     VEHICLE NOi.i
                                                     DATE   12/12/80
                                                     BAG CART NO,  1
                                                     DYNO NO,      2
                                                     CVS NO,   3

                                                     DRY BULB TEMP, 25,0 BEG C(77,0 BEG F)
                                                     ADS. HUMIDITY  5,4 CM/KG

                                                        0 KP

                                                    713,7 (28,1)
                                                    576.6 (22,7)
                                                     37,8 (100,0)
                                         TEST  WEIGHT   1021,  KG(  2250,  LBS)
                                         ACTUAL  ROAD  LOAD    5,4  KM(  7.3  HP)
                                         DIESEL     EM-329--F
                                         ODOMETER   2350, KM(  1460, MILES)
                                         NOX  HUMIDITY  CORRECTION  FACTOR    .85
323,9 (11437,)
9, 4/1 I/
6. I/ I/
11.2/13/
2.0/13/
7, 1/ 37
3, I/ 3/
4, I/ 2/
,5/ 2/
119,71
3,
8,
.06
•7 /.
O * (J
,62
3,11
371 , 3
V,90
9,
6,
10,
2.
,11
,05
4,
1,










   1200,
 ,992 (  ,983)
1,000 (  ,990)
   323,9
   70,32
    5*00

  329SOO
   745,2
     5,4
    25*0
     74,7
                                                         ,12
                                                         ,62
                                                         ,38

-------
TEST NO,   329350   RUN   2
VEHICLE MODEL   80 VW RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4


BAROMETER 745,24 MM HG(29,34 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  32, PCT
BAG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE
BLOWER DIP P MM. H20(IN, M20)
BLOWER INLET P MM, I-!20(IN, H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP, DEC, C
-------
TEST NO,   329S05   RUN   2
VEHICLE MODEL   SO VU RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 744,98 MM HG(29,33 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  27, PCT
BAG RESULTS
'   TEST CYCLE

   BLOUER DIF P MM, H20CIN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN, 1-120)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP, DEG, C(DEG, F)
   BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
   TOT FLOW STD, CU, METRES
   HC  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   HC  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
   C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
   NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   DILUTION FACTOR
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
   HC  MASS GRAMS
   CO  MASS GRAMS
   C02 MASS GRAMS
   NOX MASS GRAMS
   PARTICIPATE  MASS GRAMS
   RUN TIME
         DFC»  WET  (DRY)
         SCF,  WET  (DRY)
         VOL  (SCM)
         SAM BLR  (SCM)
         KM   (MEASURED)
o
i
    TEST  NUMBER,
    BAROMETER*            MM  HG
    HUMIDITY.             G/KG
    TEMPERATURE*          DEG C
     CARBON  DIOXIDE*       G/KM
    FUEL  CONSUMPTION*     L/100KM

    HYDROCARBONS >•         G/KM
    CARBON MONOXIDE*      G/KM
    OXIDES OF NITROGEN*   G/KN
85 KPH VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 11-5830-003

     VEHICLE NO,
     BATE   12/12/00
     BAG CART NO,   1
     DYNO NO,      2
     CVS NO,   3.

     DRY BULB TEMP, 26,7 DEG C(80,0 DEG F)
     ABS, HUMIDITY  5.9 GM/KG

        85 K

    711,2 (28.0)
    571,5 (22.5)
     37,8 (100,0)
       14478.
    162.1 (  5723.)
    52,A/11/  53*
     5,9/ I/   6,
    87,7/13/  08,
     2,9/13/   3,
    41,6/ 3/  ,71
     3,3/ 3/  ,05
    36,5/ 2/  37.
       ,6/ 2/   1,
        18,57
         47.
         83,
         ,66
        35,9
         4,40
        15.75
       1957,6
         9,61
         4.02
        AGO,
     ,946 (   ,938)
    1,000 (   ,935)
       162,1
       35,39
       14,32

       329S85
       745,0
         5,9
        26,7
        136,7
        5,30

         ,31
        1,10
         ,67
                                                                                             TEST WEIGHT  1021,  KG(  2250,  LBS)
                                                                                             ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5,4  KU(   7,3 HP)
                                                                                             DIESEL    EM-329-F
                                                                                             ODOMETER  2350,  KH< 1460.  MILES)
                                                                                             NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR   .06

-------
  TEST  NO,    329FTP   RUN    A
  VEHICLE MODEL    SO VU RABBIT
  ENGINE 1,5  L(  90,  CID) L~4
  TRANSMISSION M4

  BAROMETER 749,30 MM HG(29,50 IN  HG)
  RELATIVE HUMIDITY  62, PCT
  BAG RESULTS
     BAG NUMBER
     DESCRIPTION

     BLOWER BIF  P MM,  H20(IN,  1-120)
     BLOUER INLET P MM, M20(IN,  H20)
     BLOWER INLET TEMP, BEG, C(PEG, F)
     BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
     TOT FLOW STB,  CU.  METRES(SCF)
     HC  SAMPLE  METER/RANGE/PPM
     HC  BCKGRB  METER/RANGE/PPM
     CO  SAMPLE  METER/RANGE/PPM
     CO  BCKGRB  METER/RANGE/PPM
     C02 SAMPLE  METER/RANGE/PCT
     C02 BCKGRB  METER/RANGE/PCT
     NOX SAMPLE  METER/RANGE/PPM
     NOX BCKGRB  METER/RANGE/PPM
     DILUTION FACTOR
     HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
     CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
     C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
  o  NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
  '   HC  MASS GRAMS
  E  CO  MASS GRAMS
     C02 MASS GRAMS
     NOX MASS GRAMS

     HC  GRAMS/KM
     CO  GRAMS/KM
     C02 GRAMS/KM
     NOX GRAMS/KM
     FUEL  CONSUMPTION BY CB  L/100KM

     RUN TIME             SECONDS
     MEASURED DISTANCE     KM
     SCF»  DRY
         BFCr WET  (BRY)
         SCF, WET  (DRY)
         VOL  (SCM)
         SAM  BLR  
-------
TEST NO,   329FET   RUN   4
VEHICLE MODEL   80 VW RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L< 90, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 749,55 MM KG(29,51 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  25, PCT
BAG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE
   BLOWER BIF P MM. H2CKIN. H20)
   BLOWER INLET P MM, H20(IN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP, BEG, C(BEG, F>
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   TOT FLOW STB, CU, METRES(SCF)
   HC  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   MC  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
   C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
   NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   DILUTION FACTOR
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
   NDX CONCENTRATION PPM
   HC  MASS GRAMS
   CO  MASS GRAMS
   C02 MASS GRAMS
   NOX MASS GRAMS
   RUN TIME             SECONDS
        DFC, UET (DRY)
n
         SCFr  WET  (DRY)
         VOL  (SCM)
         SAM  BLR  (SCM)
         KM   (MEASURED)

   TEST  NUMBER*
   BAROMETER*
   HUMIDITY*
   TEMPERATURE,
    CARBON DIOXIDE»
   FUEL  CONSUMPTION?
                        MM HG
                        G/KG
                        DEC C
                         0/KM
                        L/100KM
   HYDROCARBONS^        C/KM
   CARBON MONOXIDE*     G/KM
   OXIDES OF  NITROGEN*  G/KM
HFET   VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 11-5830-003

     VEHICLE NO,
     DATE   12/19/80
     BAG CART NO,  1
     BYNO NO,      2
     CVS NO,   3,

     DRY BULB TEMP, 23,9 BEG C(75.0 BEG F)
     ABS, HUMIDITY  4,6 CM/KG

        HFET

    711,2 (20,0)
    571,5 (22,5)
     37.8 (100.0)
       20994.
    214.3 ( 7568.)
    55,5/H/  55,
     5,7/ I/   6,
    86.6/13/  87,
    12.7/13/  11,
    36,9/ 3/  ,62
     3,1/ 3/  ,05
    31,9/ 2/  32,
      ,8/ 2/   1,
        21,12
         50,
         74,
         ,58
        31,1
         6,18
        18.47
       2257.4
        10,63
        765,
     ,953 ( ,945)
    1,000 ( ,986)
       214,3
       50.68
       16,41

      329FET
       749,6
         4,6
        23,9
        137,6
        5,34

         ,38
        1,13
         ,65
                                                                                             TEST WEIGHT   1021,  KG(  2250,  LBS)
                                                                                             ACTUAL ROAD LOAD    5.4  KM(  7,3 HP)
                                                                                             DIESEL     EM--329-F
                                                                                             ODOMETER   2443, KM(  1518, MILES)
                                                                                            NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR   ,83

-------
  TEST  NO,    329F15    RUN   5
  VEHICLE  MODEL    81  VU RABBIT
  ENGINE 5,7  L(350, CID) V--G
  TRANSMISSION A3

  BAROMETER 744,47 MM HG(29,31 IN  I-IG)
  RELATIVE HUMIDITY
  BAG RESULTS
     BAG NUMBER
     DESCRIPTION
62, PCT
     BLOWER  BIF  P  MM,  H20(IN,  H20)
     BLOUER  INLET  P MM,  H20
-------
 TEST  NO,    329F17   RUN   1
 VEHICLE MODEL   81 VU RABBIT
 ENGINE 5,7 L(350, CID>  V--8
 TRANSMISSION A3

 BAROMETER 745,74 MM HG(29.36 IN I-IG)
 RELATIVE HUMIDITY  47,  PCT
 BAG RESULTS
    BAG NUMBER
    DESCRIPTION
    BLOWER BIF P MM, H20UN,  H20)
    BLOUER INLET P MM, H20(IN, H20)
    BLOWER INLET TEMP, DEB,  C(BEG,  F)
    BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
    TOT FLOW STB, CU, METRES(SCF)
    HC  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
    HC  BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PPM
    CO  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
    CO  BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PPM
    C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
    C02 BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PCT
    NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
    NOX BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PPM
    DILUTION FACTOR
    HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
    CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
    C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
    NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
    HC  MASS GRAMS
    CO  MASS GRAMS
    C02 MASS GRAMS
    NOX MASS GRAMS
    PARTICULATE MASS GRAMS
o
    HC  GRAMS/KM
    CO  GRAMS/KM
    C02 GRAMS/KM
    NOX GRAMS/KM
    FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM

    RUN TIME             SECONB5
    MEASURED DISTANCE    KM
    SCF, BRY
         DFC» WET (DRY)
         SCFr WET (DRY)
         VOL (SCM)
         SAM BLR (SCM)
         KM  (MEASURED)
         FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM

COMPOSITE RESULTS
    TEST NUMBER        329F17
    BAROMETER    MM HO  745.7
    HUMIDITY     G/KG    10,1
    TEMPERATURE  DEC C   26,1
                                                FTP    VEHICLE EMISSIONS  RESULTS
                                                        PROJECT 05-5830-003

                                                     VEHICLE  NO.l
                                                     DATE    7/ 9/81
                                                     BAG CART NO,  1 /  CVS NO,   3
                                                     DYNO NO,      2

                                                     BRY BULB TEMP, 26,1  BEG C(79,0 BEG  F)
                                                     ABS, HUMIDITY 10,1  GM/KG
TEST WEIGHT  1021, K0( 2250, LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5.4 KM<  7,3 HP)
DIESEL    EM-329-F
ODOMETER  3829, KM( 2379, MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR
98
1
lOLD TRANSIENT
701,0 (27,6)
571,5 (22,5)
35,6 ( 96.0)
13G49,
135,6 ( 4708.)
17.5/12/ 35,
4,0/ I/ 4,
49.7/13/ 47,
,9/13/ 1.
28, 4/ 3/ ,47
2,8/ 3/ ,04
14, 4/ 2/ 14.
,3/ 2/ 0,
28,19
31,
45,
.43
14,1
2,43
7,10
1057,4
3,59
1,58
,43
1,24
185.0
,63
7,16
504.
5,72
,981
,974
1,000






2
STABILIZED
711,2 (23,0)
581,7 (22.9)
32.2 ( 90.0)
23803,
234,4 ( 8276.)
7.6/12/ 15,
4,0/ I/ 4,
21.2/13/ 19,
1.0/13/ 1,
17, O/ 3/ ,27
2,6/ 3/ ,04
9,7/ 2/ 10,
,4/ 2/ 0,
48,82
11,
18,
,23
9,3
1,52
4,93
996,2
4,09
,96
,25
.80
161.9
.67
6,23
868.
6,15
,982
( ,959)
( .982)
370,0
78,55
11,87
6,68

CARBON
3
HOT TRANSIENT
703,6 (27,7)
571.5 (22,5)
35,6 ( 96,0)
13925.
136.3 ( 4314.)
14.1/12/ 28,
4,0/ I/ 4,
40.9/13/ 38,
,9/13/ 1,
24, A/ 3/ ,40
2,7/ 3/ ,04
14, 3/ 2/ 14,
,7/ 2/ 1,
32,91
24,
36,
.36
13,6
1,91
5,79
900,1
3,48
1,34
,33
1,01
157,2
,61
6,08
508.
5,73
.981
.976 (
1,000 (





DIOXIDE G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS (THC) G/KM


CARBON
OXIDES
MONOXIDE G/KM
OF NITROGEN G/KM
PARTICULATES G/KM
4
STABILIZED
711.2 (28,0)
581,7 (22,9)
32,2 ( 90,0)
23825,
234,6 ( 8283.)
7.8/12/ 16,
4,0/ I/ 4,
21.2/13/ 19,
1.3/13/ 1,
17, O/ 3/ ,27
2,4/ 3/ .04
9,9/ 2/ 10,
1,0/ 2/ 1,
48.81
12,
18,
,24
8,9
1,57
4,86
1010,0
3.93
,99
,26
,79
164,4
,64
6,33
869,
6,14
,982
,961)
,982)
370,9
78,73
11,87
6,21
3-BAG (4 -BAG)
165.4 ( 166,1)
6,38 ( 6,41)
.31 ( ,31)
,95 ( ,95)
,64 ( ,63)
,202 ( ,204)

-------
TEST NO,   329F16   RUN   6
VEHICLE: MODEL   ei vw RAPE IT
ENGINE 5,7 L(350, CID) V--8
TRANSMISSION A3

BAROMETER 743.97 MM HG(29,29 IN KG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  55, PCT
BAG RESULTS
   BAG NUMBER
   DESCRIPTION
     BLOWER DIP P
     BLOWER INLET
                MM, 1-120 (IN, h'20>
                P MM, H20(IN. H20)
                           C(DEG, F)
   HC
   HC
   CO
   CO
9
     BLOWER INLET TEMP,  DEG,
     BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
     TOT FLOW STD.  CU,  METRES(SCF)
         SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
         BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
         SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
         BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
     C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
     C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
     NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
     NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
     DILUTION FACTOR
     HC  CONCENTRATION  PPM
     CO  CONCENTRATION  PPM
     C02 CONCENTRATION  PCT
     NOX CONCENTRATION  PPM
         MASS GRAMS
         MASS GRAMS
              GRAMS
              GRAMS
     PARTICULATE MASS GRAMS
   HC
   CO
   C02 MASS
         ?Q
   HC  GRAMS/KM
   CO  GRAMS/KM
   C02 GRAMS/KM
   NOX GRAMS/KM
   FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/iOOKM
                        SECONDS
                        KM
    RUN TIME
    MEASURED DISTANCE
    SCF» DRY
         UFC» WET  (DRY)
         SCFr WET  (DRY)
         VOL (SCM)
         SAM BLR (SCM)
         KM  (MEASURED)
         FUEL CONSUMPTION L/IOOKM

COMPOSITE RESULTS
    TEST NUMBER        329F16
    BAROMETER    MM HG  744,0
    HUMIDITY     G/KG    10*9
    TEMPERATURE  DEG C   24,4
                                                  FTP     VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
                                                          PROJECT  05-5830-003

                                                       VEHICLE NO.l
                                                       BATE    6/25/81
                                                       BAG CART NO,  1 / CVS NO,  3
                                                       DYNO  NO,      2

                                                       DRY BULB TEMP, 24,4 DEG C(76,0 DEG F)
                                                       ABS,  HUMIDITY 10,9 GM/KG
TEST WEIGHT  1021,  KG( 2250,  LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5.4 KM<   7,3 HP)
DIESEL    EM-329-F
ODOMETER  3777, KM( 2347. MILES)


NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR  1,01
1
:OLD TRANSIENT
706,1 (27. G)
571.5 (22,5)
35,0 ( 95,0)
13045,
135,3 ( 4779.)
17.1/12/ 34,
4,6/ I/ 5,
44.9/13/ 42,
1.2/13/ 1,
27, 3/ 3/ ,45
3,0/ 3/ ,05
14. I/ 2/ 14,
,!/ 2/ 0,
29,43
30.
40,
,40
14.0
2,32
6,29
999,7
3,64
1,49
.41
1,11
176,2
,64
6,81
505,
5,67
.978
.975
1,000






2
STABILIZED
706,1 (27,8)
571,5 (22,5)
31,7 ( 89,0)
23833,
234,6 ( 8283.)
9.0/12/ 18,
4,6/ I/ 5,
20.6/13/ 19,
1.1/13/ 1,
16, 6/ 3/ ,26
2.7/ 3/ ,04
9,2/ 2/ 9,
,2/ 2/ 0,
49,99
13,
17,
,22
9,0
1,82
4,74
961,9
4.06
1,53
,30
,-78
157,6
,67
6,07
869.
6,10
,980
( ,957)
( ,979)
369,9
78,38
11,78
6,43

CARBON
3
HOT TRANSIENT
706,1 (27,8)
571,5 (22.5)
35,0 ( 95,0)
13845,
135,3 ( 4778,)
13.7/12/ 27,
4,6/ I/ 5,
43.8/13/ 41.
1.2/13/ 1.
25, 4/ 3/ ,41
2,5/ 3/ ,04
15, 3/ 2/ 15.
,2/ 2/ 0,
31,81
23,
39,
,38
15,1
1,79
6,12
935,4
3,93
1,52
,32
1,08
164,7
,69
6,36
504,
5.6S
,978
,974 <
1,000 (





DIOXIDE G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/IOOKM
HYDROCARBONS (THC) G/KM


CARBON
OXIDES
MONOXIDE G/KM
OF NITROGEN G/KM ,
PARTICULATES G/KM
4
STABILIZED
706,1 (27.8)
571,5 (22,5)
33,9 ( 93,0)
23841,
233,5 ( 8245,)
7.5/12/ 15.
5,0/ I/ 5,
22.9/13/ 21,
1.4/13/ 1,
18, 4/ 3/ ,29
3,2/ 3/ ,05
10, 7/ 2/ 11.
,3/ 2/ 0,
44,95
10,
19,
,25
10,4
1.35
5,22
1054,6
4,67
1,46
,22
,85
172,4
,76
6,63
869,
6,12
,979
,957)
,979)
368,8
78,39
11,80
6,50
3-BAG (4-BAG)
163,4 < 167,8)
6,31 ( 6,47)
«33 < ,30)
,93 ( ,95)
,67 ( ,70)
,258 ( ,254)

-------
 TEST NO,
         ?9F18   RUN
 VEHICLE MODEL   Cl VW RABBIT
 ENGINE 1.5 L< 90* CID) L-4
 TRANSMISSION M4

 BAROMETER 741,93 MM HG(29,21 IN HG)
 RELATIVE HUMIDITY  48, PCT
 BAG RESULTS
    BAG NUMBER
    DESCRIPTION

    BLOWER BIF P MM, 1120(IN, H20)
    BLOWER INLET P MM, M20(IN, 1120)
    BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG, C(DEG, F)
    BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
    TOT FLOW STD, CU, METRES(SCF)
        SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
        BCKfiRD METER/RANGE/PPM
               (1ETER/RANGE/PPM
               METER/RANGE/PPM
               METER/RANGE/PCT
               METER/RANGE/PCT
               METER/RANGE/PPM
               METER/RANGE/PPM
 o
HC
HC
CO
CO
CO 2
C02
NOX
NOX
    CAMPLE
    BCKI3RD
    SAMPLE
    BCKGRD
    BAMPLE
    BCKGRD
DILUTION FACTOR
HC  CONCENTRATION
CO  CONCENTRATION
    CONCENTRATION
    CONCENTRATION
    C 02
    NOX
    HC
    CO
    C02
    NOX
                  PPM
                  PPM
                  PCT
                  PPM
      •KX'J
      ^oc;
         GRAMS
    PARTICULATE MAGS

    HC  CRAMS/KM
    CO  GRAMS/KM
    C02 GRAMS/KM
    NOX GRAMS/KM
    FUEL CONSUMPTION
                 BY CB L/100KM
    RUN TIME             SECONDS
    MEASURED DISTANCE    KM
    SCF, DRY
         DFCy WET  (DRY)
         SCFv WET  (DRY)
         VOL (SCM)
         SAM BLR (SCM)
         KM  (MEASURED)
         FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM

COMPOSITE RESULTS
    TEST NUMBER        329F18
    BAROMETER    MM HG  741,9
    HUMIDITY     G/KG    10,7
    TEMPERATURE  DEG C   26,7
                                             FTP    VEHICLE EMISSIONS  RESULTS
                                                     PROJECT 05-5030-003

                                                  VEHICLE  NO.l
                                                  DATE    7/14/81
                                                  BAG CART NO,.  1  / CVS NO.   3
                                                  DYNO NO,     2

                                                  DRY BULB TEMP,  26,7  DEG C<80,0 BEG F)
                                                  ADS,  HUMIDITY 10,7 GM/KG
                                                       1
                                                COLD TRANSIENT
                                                                       STABILIZED
706,1 (27,0)
574,0 (22,6)
37,2 ( 99,0)
13815,
134,1 ( 4734,)
15.7/12/ 31.
4.0/ I/ 5,
47.3/13/ 44,
,6/13/ 1,
27, 9/ 3/ ,46
2,6/ 3/ ,04
15, 21 21 15,
,2/ 2/ 0,
28,76
27,
43,
,42
15,0
2,08
6,69
1031,1
3,84
1,72
,36
1,17
180,6
,67
6,98
503,
5,71
,980
,974
1,000




703,6 (27,7)
576,6 (22,7)
33,3 < 92,0)
23815,
232,6 ( 8214.)
7.7/12/ 15,
4,6/ I/ 5,
21.2/13/ 19,
,5/13/ 0,
17, 3/ 3/ ,28
2,8/ 3/ ,04
9,9/ 2/ 10,
,4/ 2/ 0,
47,93
11.
18,
,23
9.5
1,47
5,00
997,3
4,23
1,06
,24
,81
161.1
,68
6,20
868,
6,19
,982
( ,959)
( ,981)
366,7
70,07
11,90
6,57
 TEST WEIGHT  1021. KG( 2250, LBS)
 ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5.4 KW<  7,3 HP)
 DIESEL    EM-329--F
 ODOMETER  3870. KM( 2405, MILES)
                                                                                          NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR  1,00
i-IOT TRANSIENT

703.6 (27.7)
574,0 (22,6)
 36,1 (  97.0)
   13832,
134,5 (  4747,)
14.8/12/  30,
 4.6/ I/   5.
43.2/13/  40.
  ,3/13/   0.
24,3/ 3/  .40
 2.7/ 3/  ,04
14,7/ 2/  15,
  .7/ 2/   1.
    33,31
     25,
     39.
     ,36
    14,0
     1,94
     6,13
    874,0
     3,60
     1,44

      ,34
     1,07
    153.1
      ,63
     5,92

    504.
    5,71
    ,981
17,
 0,
.26
,04
10,
 1,
                                                                                                    ,977  (  ,961)
                                                                                                   1,000  (  ,982)
                                                                                                           367,1
                                                                                                           78,03
                                                                                                           11,82
                                                                                                            5,90
  STABILIZED

706,1 (27,8)
576,6 (22,7)
 33,3 (  92,0)
   23819,
232,6 (  0214.)
 7.3/12/  15,
 4.0/ I/
19.2/13/
  .2/13/
16.4/ 3/
 2.B/ 3/
 9.0/ 2/
  ,87 2/
    50.71
     11.
     17,
     ,22
     9,0
     1,42
     4,59
    933,1
     4,01
      ,97

      ,23
      ,75
    152,9
      ,66
     5,88

    860,
    6.10
    ,902
                                                                              CARBON DIOXIDE       G/KM
                                                                              FUEL  CONSUMPTION    L/100KM
                                                                              HYDROCARBONS  (THC)   G/KM
                                                                              CARBON MONOXIDE      G/KM
                                                                              OXIDES OF  NITROGEN   G/KM
                                                                              PARTICULATES         G/KH
3-BAG
162.9
6.28
,29
.96
,67
.220
(4-BAG)
( 160.5)
( 6,19)
( ,29)
( ,94)
( ,66)
( .216)

-------
  TEST NO,   329F19   RUN   0
  VEHICLE MODEL   00 VU  RABBIT
  ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, CID) L-4
  TRANSMISSION M4

  DAROMETER 739,65 MM 1-10(29,12  IN HG)
  RELATIVE HUMIDITY  48, PCT
  1JAG RESULTS
    HAG NUMBER
    DESCRIPTION
    BLOWER DIP P MM, I!20(IN, H20)
    BLOWER INLET P  MM,  H2CKIN, H20)
    BLOWER INLET TEMP,  BEG,  C(DEG, F>
    BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
    TOT  FLOW STB, CU, METRES(SCF)
         SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
         BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
         SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
         BCKfiRD METER/RANGE/PPM
    C02  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
    C02  BCKfiRD METER/RANGE/PCT
    NOX  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
    (VOX  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
    DILUTION FACTOR
    HC   CONCENTRATION PPM
    CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
    C02  CONCENTRATION PCT
    NOX  CONCENTRATION PPM
    HC   MASS GRAMS
    CO   MASS ORAMS
    C02  MASS GRAMS
    NOX  MASS GRAMS
    PARTICIPATE MASS GRAMS
NJ
o
   HC
   I-1C
   CO
   CO
    DC  GRAMS/KM
    CO  GRAMS/KM
    C02 GRAMS/KM
    NOX GRAMS/KM
    FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
                         SECONDS
                         KM
   RUN TIME
   MEASURED DISTANCE
   SCF,  DRY
        BFC,  WET (DRY)
        SCF*  WET (DRY)
        VOL (SCM)
        SAM BLR  (SCM)
        KM  (MEASURED)
        FUEL  CONSUMPTION  L/100KM
COMPOSITE RESULTS
    TEST NUMBER
    BAROMETER    MM HG
    HUMIDITY     G/KG
    TEMPERATURE  BEG C
                      329F19
                       739,6
                         9,1
                        23.9
                                                FTP    VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
                                                        PROJECT 05-5830-003

                                                     VEHICLE NO.l
                                                     BATE    8/20/31
                                                     BAG CART NO,  1  / CVS NO,   3
                                                     BYNO NO,    ,2

                                                     DRY BULB TEMP,  23,9 BEG C(75,0 BEG F)
                                                     ABS, HUMIDITY  9,1 CM/KG
TEST WEIGHT  1021, KG( 2250, LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5,4 KW(  7,3 HP)
DIESEL    EM-329-F
ODOMETER  4407. KM< 2788, MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR   ,95
1
lOLD TRANSIENT
696,0 (27,4)
569.0 (22,4)
35,0 ( 95,0)
13041,
134,4 ( 4745,)
32,6/H/ 33.
6,0/ I/ 6.
47.9/13/ 45,
,5/13/ 0,
28, 4/ 3/ ,47
2,9/ 3/ ,04
15, O/ 2/ 15,
,9/ 2/ 1,
28,22
27,
44,
,42
14,1
2,08
6,81
1044,2
3,45
2,27
,36
1,19
102,2
,60
7,04
504,
5,73
,980
,973
1.000






2
STABILIZED
701,0 (27,6)
574.0 (22,6)
32,8 ( 91,0)
23815.
232,1 ( 8195,)
14.1/11/ 14,
6,0/ I/ 6,
19.8/13/ 18,
,3/13/ 0,
17, 8/ 3/ .20
2,97 3/ .04
9,S/ 2/ 10.
,4/ 2/ 0,
46,58
8,
17.
,24
9,4
1,10
4.70
1024.4
3.97
1,32
,18
,76
164,8
,64
6.33
368.
6.22
,982
( ,958)
( ,981)
366.5
77,51
11,95
6,67

CARBON
3
HOT TRANSIENT
698,5 (27,5)
571,5 (22.5)
33,3 ( 92,0)
13832,
134.6 ( 4754,)
26.8/11/ 27.
6,0/ I/ 6,
43.5/13/ 41.
1.3/13/ 1,
25, 6/ 3/ ,42
2,9/ 3/ ,04
14, 8/ 2/ 15,
,27 2/ 0,
31,55
21,
39,
.38
14,6
1.63
6.05
924,7
3.57
1.52
,28
1,05
160.1
,62
6.18
504,
5,78
,981
,975 (
1,000 (





DIOXIDE G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/1QOKM
HYDROCARBONS (TMC) G/KM


CARBON
OXIDES
MONOXIDE G/KM
OF NITROGEN G/KM
P ARTICULATES G/KM
4
STABILIZED
703,6 (27,7)
576,6' (22,7)
30,6 ( 87,0)
23811,
233,2 ( 8235.)
14.3/11/ 14,
6,5/ I/ 7,
21.0/13/ 19,
1.9/13/ 2,
17, 5/ 3/ .28
3,0/ 3/ ,05
9.8/ 2/ 10,
,!/ 2/ 0.
47,39
8,
17,
,23
9,7
1,06
4.64
1001,4
4.11
1,00
,17
,75
161,8
,66
6,22
868,
6.19
,982
,960)
.981)
367,9
77,43
11,96
6,20
3-BAG (4-BAG)
167.1 ( 166,2)
6,43 ( 6,40)
,24 ( ,24)
,92 ( .92)
.63 ( ,63)
,264 ( .249)

-------
TEST NO,   453FTP   RUN   1
VEHICLE MODEL   SO VU RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, CID) L--4
TRANSMISSION H4

BAROMETER 743,71 MM HG(29,23 IN I-IG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  30, PCT
DAG RESULTS
o
to
    BAG NUMBER
    DESCRIPTION
BLOWER
BLOWER
BLOWER
BLOWER
DIP P
INLET
INLET
          REVOLUTIONS
MM, 1-120(IN,  H20)
P MM, H20(IN. H20)
TEMP, DEC, C(DEG, F)
    TOT FLOW STI), CU, METRES(SCF)
    HC  SAMP!. E METKR/RANGE/PPM
    HC  D(:i;GRIJ MfTER/RANGE/PPM
    CO  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
    CO  BCKTvRD METER/RANGE/PPM
    CO? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PHT
    CO? BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
    NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
    NOX PCKGRli METER/RANGF/PPM
    DILUTION FACTOR
    HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
    CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
    CDl1 CONCENTRATION PCT
    NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
    I!C  MASS GRAMS
    CO  MASS GRAMS
    CO? MASS GRAMS
    NOX MASS CRAMS
    PARTICIPATE  MASS GRAMS

    HC  GRAMS/KM
    CO  GRAMS/KM
    CO? GRAMS/KM
    NOX GRAMS/KM
    FUEL CONSUMPTION
                     BY CB L/100KM
                         SECONBS
                         KM
    RUM TIME
    MEASURED DISTANCE
    SCF, DRY
         DFC» WET  (DRY)
         SCF, WET  (DRY)
         VOL (SCM)
         SAM BLR (SCM)
         KM  (MEASURED)
         FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM

COMPOSITE RESULTS
TEST NUMBER
BAROMETER
HUMIDITY
TEMPERATURE
453FTP
MM h'O 743,7
G/KG 6,0
DEC C 25.0
                                                 FTP    VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
                                                         PROJECT 11-5830-003

                                                      VEHICLE N0,l
                                                      DATE    1/14/81
                                                      BAG CART NO, 1 / COS NO,  3
                                                      DYNO NO,    ;  2

                                                      DRY BULB TEMP, 25,0 DEC C(77,0 DEC F)
                                                      ABS, HUMIDITY  6,0 CM/KG
1
:OLB TRANSIENT
721,4 (23,4)
581, 7 (22,9)
35,0 ( 95,0)
13076,
137,5 ( 4054.)
35, 0/1 1/ 35,
3,87 I/ 4,
51.9/13/ 49,
,1/13/ 0,
28,87 3/ ,47
2,77 37 ,04
16 «3/ 2t 16,
,37 27 0,
27,76
31.
48,
,43
16,0
2,48
7,70
1093,5
3,64
2,26
,43
1,34
190,6
,64
7,57
505,
5,74
,986
,973
1,000



9
STABILIZED
723,9 (28,5)
504,2 (23,0)
30,0 ( 86,0)
23890,
239,3 ( 8448,)
15,4/117 15,
3,4/ 17 3,
20.5/13/ 19,
,37137 0,
17,67 37 ,28
2,87 37 ,04
10,27 27 10,
,47 27 0,
47,10
12,
18,
,24
9,0
1,67
5,05
1047,9
3,89
1,30
,27
,02
170,4
,63
6,73
870,
6,15
,9B8
( ,964)
( ,987)
376,7
81,34
11, G9
                                                                        7,14
                                                                                          TEST WEIGHT  1021,
                                                                                          ACTUAL ROAD LOAD
                                                                                          DIESEL    EM-453-F
                                                                                          ODOMETER  2544. KM(
                                                                                                      KG( 2250, LBSJ
                                                                                                      5,4 KW(  7,3 HP)

                                                                                                        1581, MILES)
                                                                                          NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR    ,37
                                                                                             HOT  TRANSIENT

                                                                                             723,9  (28,5)
                                                                                             504,2  (23,0)
                                                                                              35,0  (  95,0)
                                                                                                                 723,9  (20,5)
                                                                                                                 584,2  (23,0)
                                                                                                                  31,1  ( 38,0)
                                                                                                                    23795,
                                                                                  CARBON  DIOXIDE
                                                                                  FUEL CONSUMP
                                                                                  HYDROCARBONS
                                                                                  CARBON  MONOX
                                                                                  OXIDES  OF  NI
                                                                                  PARTICULATES
137,1 ( 4842,)
25,17117 25,
3,47 17 3,
45,6/137 43,
,3/137 0,
25,47 3/ ,41
2,6/ 3/ ,04
16,57 2/ 17,
,77 27 1,
31,81
22,
42,
,38
15,8
1,73
6,66
944,2
3,59
1,74
,30
1.17
166,4
,63
6,60
505,
5,60
,987
,975 (
1,000 (





IDE G/KM
PTION L/100KM
IS (TI-IC) G/KM
iXIDE G/KM
IITROGEN G/KM
:s G/KM
237,5 ( 8387,)
10.0/11/ 10,
2,9/ 17 3,
20.1/13/ 18,
,3/13/ 0,
17.37 3/ ,28
2,8/ 3/ ,04
10, 6/ 2f 11,
,7/27 1,
47,91
15.
18,
,23
9,9
2,08
4,91
1018,4
3,90
0,00
,34
,80
166,5
,64
6,59
867,
6.12
.988
,966)
,987)
374.7
80.68
11,79
6,59
3-BAG (4-BAG)
173,5 ( 172,3)
6,37 ( 6,93)
,31 ( ,33)
1,03 ( 1,02)
.63 ( ,63)
,275 ( 0,000)

-------
 TEST NO,    453FF.T   RUN   1
 VEHICLE MODEL   30 V(J RABBIT
 ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, CID) L-4
 TRANSMISSION M4


 BAROMETER 743,71 MM 1-10(29,28 IN
 RELATIVE HUMIDITY  26, PCT
 lir'iC RESULTS
    lilST CYCLE
?
    DlCUER
    IH OUER
    BLOWER
    BLDWEfi
    TOT FLOW
    HC
    HC
    C'l
    CO
    C02
    dl?
    (•'MX
    NO*
    CO 2
    NOX
    HC
    CO
        D.T.F P MM,  H20(IN, H20)
        INLET P MM,  H20(.TN,  H20)
        INLET TEMP,  DEO,  C(DEG, F)
        REVOLUTIONS
          STIi, CU,  METRES (SCF)
     SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
     BCKGRn METER/RANGE/PPM
     SAMPLE METFR/RANGE/PPM
     DCKGRfi METER/RANGE/PPM
     SAMPl. F METER/RANGF/PCT
     fCKGRD rtf.ITER/RANGE/PCT
     •SAMPLE Ml TER/RANGE/PPM
     KCKiMi METER/RANGE/PPM
     ITII-JN FACTOR
     CONCENTRATION PPM
     CONCENTRATION PPM
     CONCENTRATION PCT
     CONCENTRATION PPM
     MASS GRAMS
     MASS GRAMS
     MASS GRAMS
 NOX MASS GRAMS
 PARTICIPATE MAJ
 RUN TIME
      DFC*  WET
      SCF.
                     GRAMS
                         SECONDS
                  (DRY)
                  (DRY)
      VOL  CGCM)
      GAM  BLR  (SCM)
      KM   (MEASURED)

TEST  NUMBER*
BAROMETER,            MM HG
HUMIDITY*             G/KG
TEMPERATURE»          DEC C
 CARBON DIOXIDE.       G/KM
FUEL  CONSUMPTION>     L/100KM

HYDROCARBONS*         G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE?      G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN,   G/KM
FET    VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 11-5830-003

     VEHICLE N0,l
     DATE    1/14/81
     BAG CART NO,  1
     DYNO NO,    .  2
     CVS NO,   3"

     DRY BULB TEMP* 26.1 DEG C(79,0 DEC F)
     ADS, HUMIDITY  5,5 GM./K'G

        FET

    718,8 (28,3)
    58.1,7 (22,9)
     38,3 (101,0)
       21042,
    206.0 ( 7304,)
    53.1/11/  53.
     2.9/ I/   3,
    82.5/13/  82,
      ,1/13/   0,
    39, 7/ 3/  ,67
     3,0/ 3/  .05
    32, 3/ 2/  32,
      ,3/ 2/   0,
        19,55
         50,
         00,
         ,63
        32,0
         6,00
        19,30
       2380,5
        10,82
         4,39
        766,
     ,949 ( ,941)
    1,000 ( ,985)
       206, 8
       44,65
       16,41

      453FET
       743,7
                                                                                           TEST WEIGHT  1021. KG< 2250, LDS)
                                                                                           ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5.4 KU(  7,3 HP)
                                                                                           DIESEL    EM-453-F
                                                                                           ODOMETER  2564. KM( 1593, MILES)
                                                                                           NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR    .05
                                                          5,
                                                         26,1
                                                         145,0
                                                         5,61

                                                          ,37
                                                         1,18
                                                          ,66

-------
 TECT NO,    453FTP   RUN   2
 VEHICLE  MODEL   00 VW RABBIT
 ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, CID)  L~4
 TRANSMISSION M4
 BAROMETER 751,33 MM 1-10(29,53 IN MO)
 RELATIVE HUMIDITY  32, PCT
 BAG RESULTS
    BAG NUMBER
    DESCRIPTION

    BLOWER DIP P MM, H20(IN, 1120)
    BLOWER INLET P MM, M20UN, H20)
    BLOWER INLET TEMP, DEC, C(DEG, F)
    BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
    TOT FLOW OTD, CU, METRES(SCF)
    IIC  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
    HC  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
    CO  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
    CO  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
    C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
    C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
    NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
    NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
    DILUTION FACTOR
    HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
    CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
    C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
    NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
        MASS GRAMS
        MASS CRAMS
n
   HC
   CO
    C02 MASS GRAMS
    NOX MASS GRAMS
    PARTICULATE MASS GRAMS

    HC  GRAMS/KM
    CO  GRAMS/KH
    C02 GRAMS/KM
    NOX GRAMS/KM
    FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM

    RUN TIME             SECONDS
    MEASURED DISTANCE    KM
         DFC, WET (DRY)
         SCFr WET (DRY)
         VOL (SCM)
         SAM BLR (SCM)
         KM  (MEASURED)
         FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
COMPOSITE RESULTS
    TEST NUMBER        453FTP
    BAROMETER    MM HO  751,3
    HUMIDITY     G/KG     4,9
    TEMPERATURE  BEG C   20,6
                                               FTP     VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
                                                       PROJECT  11-5030,003

                                                     VEHICLE N0,l
                                                     DATE    1/16/81
                                                     BAG CART NO,   1
                                                     DYNO NO,  .1    2
                                                     CVS NO,   3

                                                     DRY BULB TEMP, 20,6 DEG  C(69,0 DEC F)
                                                                   4,9 GH/KG
TEST WEIGHT  1021. KG( 2250, LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5,4 KM(  7,3 HP)
DIESEL    EM--453-F
ODOMETER  2639, KM( 1640. MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR   ,04
1
OLD TRANSIENT
726,4 (28,6)
506,7 (23,1)
34,4 ( 94,0)
13054,
138,7 ( 4890,)
29.7/11/ 30,
3,8/ I/ 4,
47.7/13/ 45*
,8/13/ 1,
20, 7/ 3/ ,47
3,3/ 3/ ,05
17, V 2/ 17,
,6/ 2/ 1.
27*92
26,
43,
,42
16,8
2,09
6,99
1076,3
3,74
1.C9
,36
1,22
187,8
,65
7.23
505,
5,73
,974
1,000






9
STABILIZED
734,1 (28,9)
591,3 (23,3)
29,4 ( 85,0)
23Q07,
241,1 ( 8512,)
13,7/il/ 14,
3,5/ I/ 4,
22.3/13/ 20,
,6/13/ 1,
17, 3/ 3/ ,28
2.7/ 3/ .04
10, O/ 2/ 11,
,6/ 2/ 1,
47,95
10,
19.
,24
10,2
1,43
5,47
1040,2
3,95
1,03
.23
,88
166.7
,63
6,39
867,
6,24
( ,964)
( ,906)
379.8
81.37
11,97
6,79

CARBON
3
HOT TRANSIENT
729.0 (28,7)
509.3 (23.2)
33.3 ( 92.0)
13050.
138,8 ( 4903,)
27.0/11/ 27,
3,5/ I/ 4,
44.9/13/ 42,
,0/13/ 1.
25. 7/ 3/ ,42
3,4/ 3/ ,05
17, 9/ 2/ 13.
>6/ 2/ 1,
31.41
24,
41,
.37
17,3
1,09
6.56
938,9
3,86
1 , 54
.33
1,14
163,5
,67
6,30
504,
5.74
,975 (
1.000 (





DIOXIDE G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS (THC) G/KM


CARBON
OXIDES
MONOXIDE C/KM
OF NITROGEN G/KM
PARTICULATES G/KM
4
STABILIZED
731.5 (28,8)
591,0 (23.3)
29,4 ( 85.0)
23000 ,
240,9 ( 8504,)
12.3/11/ 13.
3.7/ I/ 4,
20.0/13/ 19,
.7/13/ 1,
10. O/ 3/ ,29
3,5/ 3/ ,05
11. 3/ 2/ 11.
.6/ 2/ 1,
46,05
9,
10,
,24
10.7
1,28
5,06
1037.9
4,14
0,00
.21
.81
167.2
.67
6.41
867.
6.21
.964)
.987)
379.7
81.22
11,95
6.35
3- BAG (4- BAG)
170.2 ( 170.3)
6.54 ( 6,54)
,28 ( .28)
1.02 ( 1,00)
,65 ( ,66)
.293 ( 0.000)

-------
 TEST NO,    453FET   RUN   2
 VEHICLE MODEL   00 VW RABBIT
 ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, CID) L-4
 TRANSMISSION M4
 BAROMETER 751,08 MM HGC29.57 IN HG)
 RELATIVE HUMIDITY  27,  PCT
 SAG RESULTS
    TEST CYCLE

    BLOWER DIP P MM, 1-120(IN,  M20)
    BLOWER INLET P MM,  H20(IN.  H20)
    BLOWER INLET TEMP,  DEC, C(DEG. F)
    BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
    TOT FLOW STD. CU, METRES(SCF)
        SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
        BCKORD METER/RANGE/PPM
        SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
        BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PPM
to
 HC
 HC
 CO
 CO
 C02
        SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
 C02 BCKCRB METER/RANCE/PCT
 NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
 NOX BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PPM
 DILUTION  FACTOR
 HC   CONCENTRATION PPM
 CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
 C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
 NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 IIC   MASS  GRAMS
 CO   MASS  GRAMS
 C02 MASS  GRAMS
 NOX MAGS  GRAMS
 PARTICULATE MASS  CRAMS
 RUN TIME              SECONDS
     BFC»  WET (DRY)
     SCFr  WET (DRY)
     VOL  (SCM)
     SAM BLR (SCM)
     KM   (MEASURED)

 TEST NUMBERx
 BAROMETER>            MM HG
 HUMIBITYr             G/KG
 TEMPERATUREr          BEG C
 CARBON DIOXIDE*      G/KM
 FUEL CONSUMPTION?     L/100KM

HYDROCARBONS*          G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDEF     G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN*  G/KM
HFET   VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 11-5830-003

     VEHICLE NO.l
     BATE    1/16/81
     BAG CART NO.  1
     DYNO NO,  ..   2
     CVS NO,   3

     DRY BULB TEMP,  25,0 BEG C(77.0 BEO F)
     ABS, HUMIDITY  5,3 GM/KG

        HFET

    716,3 (28,2)
    584,2 (23,0)
     37,3 (100,0)
       20968,
    209,0 (  7379,)
    52.9/11/  53,
     3»7/ I/   4,
    85.7/13/  86,
                                                                                           TEST WEIGHT   1021,
                                                                                           ACTUAL ROAB LOAD
                                                                                           DIESEL    EH-453-F
                                                                                           ODOMETER  2617, KM<
KG(
5,4
2250, LBS)
KU(  7,3 HP)
 1626, MILES)
                                                                                          NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR    ,85
    40, I/ 3/  .68
     3,0/ 3/  ,05
    33, 2/ 2/  33,
      ,4/ 2/   0,
        19,33
         4?,
         83,
         ,64
        32,8
         5.95
        20.21
       2433.6
        11,12
         4,61
        764,
     ,948 (  ,940)
    1,000 (  .985)
       209,0
       45,34
       16,51

      453FET
       751,1
         5.3
        25,0
        147,4
        5.70

         ,36
        1.22
         .67

-------
     MO.   453^00   RUN
vTirtf;! r Kiinn    no vu  RAr:;i
I. NC.1NL 1,5 L( 00, CiriJ I.  4
TRANSMISSION (14
BAG
                  Mfi  i 10(29,20  IN MO)
                   40 -  PI.T
o

NJ
Ln
           .
   TECT CYCLE
   [(LOWER
   iiLOUER
TOT
HC
HC

CO
C02
C02
NOX
NOX
          Jill"

             MM, H20CCN,  H20)
             P MM, H20(IN, H20)
    J;:R INLET TEMP, DEC,  CIDEG,  F)
    JER REVOLUTIONS
    FLOW GTD, CU, MFTREG(GCF)
    SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
    DCKGRH METER/RANCE/PPM
    GAMPU-  flFlER/RANGE/PPM
    LiCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
    SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
    DCKGRD HETER/
(ANCE/PCT
C02
NOX
HC

CO 2
NOX
    GAMPLE flEVEf;'/ I'ANCE/PPM
    ICKGRD METER/(ANGE/PPM
 !11..LIT [ON FACTOR
 1C  CONCENTRATION  PPM
 ;0  CONCENTRATION  PPM
    CONCENTRATION  PCT
    CGNCENTRAllON  PPM
    MAS'.) GRAMS
    MAGS GRAMS
    MAGS GRAMS
    MASS GRAMS
PARTICULATE  MAGG CRAMS
RUN TIME              SECONDS
      [iFC* WET  (DRY)
      SCFr WET  (DRY)
      VOL (GCri)
      SAn DLR  (GCfi)
      KM  (MEASURED)

TEST  NUh'DER,
BAROMETFRy             MM  HG
HUMIDITY,             (,/KG
TEMPERATURE.          DEC C
 CARDON DioxiDEy       G/KM
FUEL  CONSUMPTION*     L/100KM
                     G/KN
                     0/KM
          NITROGEN*  G/KM
   CARBON
   rj>'jnr;n
                                                 I DLL   VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
                                                         PROJECT 11-5030-003

                                                      VEHICLE NO.l
                                                      DATE    I/1.9/01
                                                      BAG CART NO,  1
                                                      DYNO NO,      2
                                                      Cl'G NO.   3
                                                   ADS,  HUMIDITY  6,1 CM/KG

                                                      IDLE

                                                  736,6  (29,0)
                                                        ,
                                                        ~! 9 o o r>
                                                     330, ?' (1.1676.)
                                                     10,1/117  10,
                                                      5,0/ I/   5»
                                                     J4.1/13/
                                                      5,0/13/
                                                      6,9/ 3/
                                                      2,0/ 3/
                                                      3,9/ 2/
                                                       ,2/ 2/
                                                                                            TEST  WEIGHT  1021. KC( 2250, IBS)
                                                                                            ACTUAL  ROAD LOAD   5,4 KU(
                                                                                            DIESEL     EM-453-F
                                                                                            ODOMETER  2657,  KM( 1651, MILES)
                                                                                                                             IP)
                                                                                              NOX  HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR   ,07
                                                                  ,
                                                                5,
                                                               ,11
                                                               ,04
                                                                4,
                                                                0,
                                                        122,02
                                                           8,
                                                          .06
                                                          3,7
                                                           ,98
                                                          3,1.5
                                                         3H9.7
                                                          2,03
                                                           ,20
                                                        1201,
                                                       ,992 ( ,979)
                                                     1,000 ( ,906)
                                                        330 , 7
                                                        71,02
                                                         5 , 00

                                                       453SOO
                                                        741,7
                                                          6,1
                                                         20,6
          or

-------
TEST NO,   453S50   RUN   2
VEHICLE MODEL   00 VW RABBIT
ENGINE 1.5 L( 90, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
 BAROMETER 740.92 MM HO(29.17 IN HG)
 RELATIVE HUMIDITY  43. PCT
 BAG RESULTS
    TEST CYCLE

    BLOWER DIF P  MM. 1-120(IN.  H20)
    BLOWER INLET  P MM.  H20(IN,  H20)
    BLOWER INLET  TEMP,  DEG,  C(DEG»  F)
    BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
    TOT  FLOW STD,  CU, METRES(SCF)
    HC  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
    IIC  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
    CO  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
    CO  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
    C02  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
    C02  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
    NOX  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
    NOX  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
    DILUTION FACTOR
    IIC  CONCENTRATION PPM
?   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
sj   C02  CONCENTRATION PCT
*   NOX  CONCENTRATION PPM
    HC  MASS GRAMS
    CO  MASS GRAMS
    C02  MASS GRAMS
    NOX  MASS GRAMS
    PARTICULATE MASS GRAMS
    RUN  TIME             SECONDS
         DFC*  WET (DRY)
         SCF*  WET  (DRY)
         VOL (SCM)
         SAM BLR  (SCM)
         KM   (MEASURED)

    TEST  NUMBER*
    BAROMETER*            MM HG
    HUMIDITY*             G/KG
    TEMPERATURE*          DEG C
    CARBON  DIOXIDE/      G/KM
    FUEL CONSUMPTION*     L/100KM

    HYDROCARBONS*          G/KM
   CARBON MONOXIDE*      G/KM
   OXIDES OF NITROGEN*    G/KM
50 KPH VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 11-5830-003

     VEHICLE NOil
     DATE    1/19/01
     BAG CART NO,  1
     DYNO NO,  '    2
     CVS NO,   3

     DRY BULB TEMP. 20,6 DEG C(69.0 DEG F)
     ABS. HUMIDITY  6,7 GM/KG

        50 K

    734.1 (23,?)
    589,3 (23,2)
     31,7 ( 89.0)
       16477.
    163,4 ( 5771,)
    28,7/117  29.
     7,07 I/   7.
    36,4/137  34,
     2,07137   2,
    24,37 37  ,40
     3.27 37  ,05
    17,07 27  17,
      ,37 27   0*
        33,37
         22,
         31,
         ,35
        16,7
         2,06
         5,95
       1041.0
         4.61
         1,49
        600,
     ,970 ( ,956)
    1.000 ( .932)
       163.4
       35,11
        3,47

      453S50
       740,9
         6,7
        20,6
        122.9
        4,73

         ,24
         ,70
         .54
                                                                                              TEST WEIGHT   1021, K0( 2250, LBS)
                                                                                              ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5,4 KW<  7,3  HP)
                                                                                              DIESEL    EM-453-F
                                                                                              ODOMETER  2657, KMC  1651, MILES)
                                                                                             NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR   .OS

-------
TEST NO,   453S85   RUN   2
VEHICLE MODEL   DO VU RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L< 90, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 740,66 MM IIG<29,16 IN MG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  32, PCT
BAG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE

   BLOWER DIP P MM, H20UN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET P MM, H20(IN, M20)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP, DEC,  C(DEC, F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
o
 i
NJ
   HC
   HC
   CO
   CO
    HC
    CO
              CU, METRES
    SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
    BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PPM
    SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
    BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANCE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
MC  CONCENTRATION PPM
CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
      SS GRAMS
      SS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
PARTICULATE MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME             SECONDS
     DFCy WET (DRY)
     SCF> WET (DRY)
     VOL (SCM)
     SAM ELR (SCM)
     KM  (MEASURED)

TEST NUMBERy
BAROMETER?           MM MG
HUMIDITY;            G/KG
TEMPERATUREr         DEG C
 CARDON DIOXIDE*      G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION*    L/100KM

HYDROCARBONSy        G/KM
CARDON MONOXIDEy     C/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN*  G/KM
85 KPH VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 11-5830-003

     VEHICLE NO.l
     DATE    1/19/01
     BAG CART NO,  1
     DYNO NO,  •>   2
     CVS NO,   3

     DRY BULB TEMP, 22,2 DEG C(72,0 DEG F)
     ABS, HUMIDITY  5,4 GM/KG

        85 K

    716,3 (28,2)
    581,7 (22,9)
     30,9 (102,0)
       16504,
    161,0 (  5634.)
    70.3/11/  70.
     7,9/ I/   8,
    50,9/12/ 100,
                                                                                          TEST WEIGHT  1021, K0( 2250, LBS)
                                                                                          ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5,4 KU(  7,3 h'l
                                                                                          DIESEL    EM-453-F
                                                                                          ODOMETER  2667. KM( 1657,  MILEC)
                                                                                          NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR   ,85
       3/12/
    43,3/ 3/
     3,2/ 3/
    38,6/ ?./
 1,
,74
,05
39,
 0,
        17,70
         63,
        104,
         ,69
        38,2
         5,83
        19,51
       2043,2
        10,02
         5,16
        601.
     ,944 (  ,934)
    1,000 (  ,903)
       161,0
       34,52
       14,43

      453SS5
       740,7
         5,4
        22,2
        141,6
        5,49

         ,40
        1,35
         ,69

-------
TEST NO,   453F10   RUN   1
VEHICLE MODEL   80 VU RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L( 90. CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4

BAROMETER 741,93 MM HG(29,21 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  49, PCT
[:AC RESULTS
   BAG NUMBER
   DESCRIPTION

   BLOWER BIF P MM, H20(IN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET P MM, H20(1N. H20)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP, BEG, C(DEG, F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   TOT FLOW STH, CU,  METRES(SCF)
   HC  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   HC  BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  BCKORB METER/RANGE/PPM
   002 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
   !.;f)2 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
   NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   NUX BCKGRJJ METER/RANGE/PPM
   DILUTION FACTOR
   !!C  CONCENTRATION  PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION  PPM
   C02 CONCENTRATION  PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION  PPM
   HC  MASS GRAMS
   CO  MASS GRAMS
   C02 MASS GRAMS
   NQX MAGS GRAMS
   PARTICIPATE MASS GRAMS
     HC  GRAMS/KM
     CO  GRAMS/KM
     C02 GRAMS/KM
     NOX GRAMS/KM
     FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM

     RUN TIME             SECONDS
     MEASURED DISTANCE    KM
     SCFv DRY
          DFC»  WET (DRY)
          SCF>  WET (DRY)
          VOL (SCM)
          SAM BLR (SCM)
          KM   (MEASURED)
          FUEL  CONSUMPTION L/100KM

COMPOSITE RESULTS
     TEST NUMBER         453F10
     BAROMETER     MM HG  741,9
     HUMIDITY      0/KG     10*0
CO
                                                  FTP    VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
                                                          PROJECT 11-5830--003

                                                       VEHICLE NO,01
                                                       BATE    4/30/81
                                                       BAG CART NO, 1 / CVS NO,  3
                                                       DYNO NO,      2

                                                       DRY BULB TEMP, 25,0 DEC C(77,0 DEC F)
                                                       ABS, HUMIDITY 10,0 GM/KG
                                                                    TEST WEIGHT  1021, KG( 2250, LBS)
                                                                    ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5.4 KM<  7,3 HP)
                                                                    DIESEL    EH-453-F
                                                                    ODOMETER  2850, KM< 1771. MILES)
                                                                    NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR    ,93
    TEMPERATURE  DEG C
J.O
1
;OLB TRANSIENT
701,0 (27,6)
563,9 (22,2)
37,2 ( 99,0)
13872,
106,3 ( 3752,)
54.4/11/ 54,
8,0/ I/ 9,
73,8/137 72,
4,3/137 4,
35,97 37 ,60
3,47 3/ .05
22, 8/ 21 23,
,9/ 27 1,
21,80
46,
67,
,55
21,9
2,82
8,25
1074,7
4,35
2,01
,48
1,42
184,0
,75
7,14
505,
5,81
,979 ;
,966 (
1,000 (






2
STABILIZED
706,1 (27,8)
569,0 (22,4)
35,6 ( 96,0)
23829,
182,9 ( 6460,)
23, 2/1 I/ 23,
7*37 17 7,
34.8/13/ 32,
4,1/137 4,
22,27 37 ,36
3,37 37 ,05
14,37 2/ 14,
,6/ 27 1,
36,75
16,
28,
,31
13.7
1,70
5,94
1038,4
4,68
1,37
,27
,95
165,5
,75
6,36
868,
6.27
,981
,951)
,980)
239,2
0.00
12,09
6,74

CARBON
3
HOT TRANSIENT
698.5 (27,5)
563,9 (22*2)
36,7 ( 98.0)
13872,
106,4 ( 3755.)
43,5/117 44,
7*37 17 7,
64.2/13/ 62.
4,0/137 4,
32,37 3/ ,54
3,8/ 3/ ,06
21,77 27 22.
,67 2/ 1,
24,49
37,
57,
,48
21.1
2,24
7,04
936,5
4.19
1,49
,39
1,21
161*2
,72
6,22
505,
5.81
,979
.960 (
1,000 (





DIOXIDE G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS (THC) G/KM


CARBON
OXIDES
MONOXIDE G/KM
OF NITROGEN G/KM
PARTI CULATES G/KM
4
STABILIZED
706,1 (27,8)
569,0 (22.4)
35,6 ( 96,0)
23834 ,
183,0 < 6461,)
21.6/11/ 22,
6.7/ I/ 7,
33.2/137 31,
3.7/13/ 3,
21, 6/ 3/ ,35
3.4/ 3/ ,05
14, 2/ 2/ 14,
,6/ 2/ 1,
37,85
15,
27,
,30
13,6
1,59
5,70
999.0
4,65
0,00
,25
,91
159,1
,74
6,11
868,
6,28
,981
.953)
.980)
289,3
0,00
12,09
6,17
3-BAB (4-BAO)
168,3 ( 166,4)
6,48 ( 6.41)
.35 ( ,34)
1,12 ( 1,11)
.74 ( ,74)
,255 ( 0.000)

-------
 TEST NO,    473F01    RUN   1
 VEHICLE MODEL   80 VU RABBIT
 ENGINE 1,5 L( 90,  CID) L~4
 TRANSMISSION M4

 BAROMETER 740,66 MM HG(29,16 IN HG)
 RELATIVE HUMIDITY  53, PCT
 BAG RESULTS
    BAG NUMBER
    DESCRIPTION

    BLOWER niF P MM, M20(IN, 1-120)
    BLOWER INLET P MM, ll2()
-------
TEST NO,   473F03   RUN   1
VEHICLE MODEL   GO VW RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M-
BAROMETER 740,66 MM HG<29.16 IN HO)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  53, PCT
BAG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE

   BLOWER DIE P MM, H20(IN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET P MM, H20(IN, 1-120)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP, BEG, C(DEG, F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   TOT FLOW 8TD. CU, METRES(SCF)
   HC  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   HC  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   f:0  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
   Cfl? BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
   NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   DILUTION FACTOR
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
n  CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
   HC  MASS GRAMS
   CO  MASS GRAMS
   C02 MASS GRAMS
   NDX MASS GRAMS
   PARTICIPATE MASS GRAMS
   RUN TIME             SECONDS
        DFC> UET (DRY)
        SCFi- UET (DRY)
        V.OL (SCM)
        SAM BLR (SCM)
        KM  (MEASURED)
U)
o
   TEST NUMBER»
   BAROMETER)'            MM HG
   HUMIDITY,             G/KG
   TEMPERATUREy          BEG C
    CARBON  DIOXIDE*       G/KM
   FUEL CONSUMPTION*     L/100KM

   HYTiROCARBONSt         G/KM
   CARBON MONOXIDE^      G/KM
   OXIDES OF NITROGEN>
IDLE   VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 11-5830-003

     VEHICLE NO.l
     DATE    5/ 6/81
     BAG CART NO,   1
     DYNO NO,      2
     CVS NO,   3

     DRY BULB TEMP, 25,0 BEG C(77,0 DEG F)
     ABS,  HUMIDITY 10.7 CM/KG

        IDLE

    716,3 (28,2)
    574,0 (22,6)
     32,2 (  90,0)
       3994?,
    323,5 (11424,)
     9,0/li/   9,
     5,3/ I/   5,
    12.1/13/  11,
              ,11
              ,06
               4,
                                                                                             TEST UEIGHT  1021.  KG( 2250, LBS)
                                                                                             ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5.4 KU<  7.3 HP)
                                                                                             DIESEL    EM-473-F
                                                                                             ODOMETER  2982. KM( 1853, MILES)
                                                                                             NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR  1,00
                                                     7,4/ 3/
                                                     3.A/ 3/
                                                     4,3/ 2/
                                                      ,6/ 2/
                                                       114. SI
                                                          4,
                                                         10.
         3,7
          .69
         3,75
        355,7
         2,29
          ,16
       1200.
     ,991 (  .974)
    1.000 (  ,982)
       323.5
       68.18
        5.00

      473103
       740.7
        10.7
        25.0
         71,1
        2,06

         ,14
         ,75
         .46

-------
TEST NO,   473H02   RUN   1
VEHICLE MODEL   00 VU RAHHTT
ENGINE 1,5 L< 90, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
AROMETER
                 MM
RtLATTWF HUMIDITY
DAG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE
HG(29,16
.3, PCT
IN HO)
 ?
 u>
                MM, H20CIN, M20)
                P MM, H2DUN, H20)
                      DI-G, CCBEG, F)
  BLOWER DIF P
  BLOWER INLET
  EiLOUER INLET TEMP.
  HLOWER REVOLUTIONS
  TOT FLOW STD, CU, METRES(SCF)
  Mi;  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
  HC  BCKGRB METER/RANCE/PPM
  CO  SAMPLE METER/RANOE/PPM
  CO  BCKGRB HETER/RANGE/PPM
  C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
  C02 BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PCT
  NOX CAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPH
  NOX I'^CKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
  DILUTION' FACTOR
  HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
  CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
  C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
  NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
  HC  MASS GRAMS
  CO  MAGS GRAMS
  C02 MASS GRAMS
  NOX MASS GRAMS
  PARTICULATE  MASS GRAMS
  RUN TIME             SECONDS
       BFC> WET (DRY)
       SCF> WET (DRY)
       VOL (SCM)
       SAM BLR (SCM)
       KM  (MEASURED)
    TEST  NUMBER>
    BAROMETERy            MM  HG
    HUMIDITY*             G/KG
    TEMPERATURE,          BEG C
    CARBON  DIOXIDE*       G/KM
    FUEL  CONSUMPTION.     L/100KM

    HYDROCARBONSr         G/KM
    CARBON MONOXIBE/      G/KM
    OXIDES OF NITROGEN?   G/KM
HFET   VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 11-5030-003

     VEHICLE N'0,1
     DATE    5/ 6/01
     BAG CART NO,  1
     DYNO NO,      2
     CVS NO,   3!

     BRY BULB TEMP, 25,0 DEG C(77,0 BEG F)
     ABS, HUMIDITY 10,7 CM/KG

        HFET

    716,3 (28,2)
    579,1 (22,8)
     3G.9 (102,0)
       21018,
    203,6 <  7109,)
    *#**/!!/ 101,
     5,2/ I/   5,
    55.0/12/ 113,
                                                                                            TEST WEIGHT  1021, KG( 2250, LBS)
                                                                                            ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5,4 KU(
                                                                                            BIESEL    EM-473-F
                                                                                            ODOMETER  2966, KM( 1843, MILES)
                                                                                            NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR  1,00
                                39, 5/ 3/  .67
                                 3,4/ 3/  ,05
                                29, 5/ 2/  30,
                                   ,8/ 2/   1,
                                    19,42
                                     96,
                                    114,
                                     ,62
                                    28,7
                                    11,27
                                    27,04
                                   2307,6
                                    11,19
                                     4.24
                                    765,
                                 ,949 (  ,932)
                                1,000 (  ,977)
                                   203,6
                                   43,34
                                                     473M02
                                                      740,7
                                                       10,7
                                                       25,0
                                                       142,2
                                                       5,78

                                                        ,69
                                                       1,67
                                                        ,69

-------
 TEST NO,   473504   RUN
 BAROMETER 740,16 MM HG(29,14 IN HG)
 RELATIVE HUMIDITY  53. PCT
 BAG RESULTS
    TEST CYCLE

    BLOWER DIP F1 MM, H20(IN. H20)
    DL.OUER INLET P MM, H20(IN, H20)
    BLOWER INLET TEMP, DEC, CXDEG, F)
    BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
n
to
    TOT
    Hi'
    HC
    CO
    CO
    r:02
    C02
    NOX
    NOX
    FLOW STD, CU, METRES(SCF)
    SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
    ECKGRD ilETER/RANGE/PPM
           METER/RANGE/PPM
           METER/RANGE/PPM
           METER/RANGE/PCT
           HETER/RANGE/PCT
           METER/RANGE/PPM
           METER/RANGE/F'PM
     SAMPLE
     ECKGRD
     SAMPLE
     BCKGRD
     :,YiMPLE
     DCKGRD
 DILUTION  FACTOR
     CONCENTRATION
     CONCENTRATION
     CONCENTRATION
     CONCENTRATION
     MASS  GRAMS
CO?
Nfl.X
HC
CO
C02
NOX
PPM
PPM
PCT
PPH
        MAE
         GRAMS
    MAGS GRAMG
    MASS GRAMS
PARTICIPATE  MASS  GR(
RUN TIME
     DFC» UET (DRY)
     SCF* WET (DRY)
     VOL (SCM)
     SAM BLR (SCM)
     KM  (MEASURED)

TEST NUMBER*
BAROMETER*
HUMIDITY*
TEMPERATURE»
 CARBON DIOXIDE?
FUEL CONSUMPTION*

HYDROCARBONS*
CARBON MONOXIDE*
OXIDES OF NITROGEN*
                         MM HG
                         G/KG
                         BEG C
                          C/KM
                         L/100KM

                         G/KM
                         G/KM
                         G/KH
                                             50 KPH VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
                                                     PROJECT 11-5330-003

                                                  VEHICLE NO.l
                                                  DATE    5/ 6/81
                                                                                           TEST WEIGHT  1021,  KG<  2250,  LBS)
                                                                                           ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5,4  KW(   7.3 HP)
                                                                                                    SfeS?3KM~(  1853. MILE
                                                                                                                              )
 CVS NO,   3

 DRY BULB TEMP, 25,6 DEG C(7G,0 DEC F)
 AUG. HUMIDITY 11,2 GM/KG

    50 K

711,2 (28,0)
563,9 (22,2)
 34,4 ( 74,0)
   16493.
161,4 ( 5698.)
13,2/il/  13,
 4,9/ I/   5.
20.4/13/  19,
  ,7/U/   1,
22, O/ 3/  ,36
 3.5/ 3/  .05
14, 6/ 2/  15.
 l.l/ 2/   1,
    37,34
      8,
     18,
     ,30
    13,5
      ,73
     3,29
    896,8
     4.24
      ,69
    601.
 ,973 ( ,957)
1.000 ( ,980)
   161,4
   34,21
    8.38

  473504
   740,2
    1.1,2
    25.6
    107,1
    4,25

     ,09
     ,39
     ,51
                                                                                          NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR   1.02

-------
  •J NO,
  iff; IF MO DTI
  ",l.Ni:  1,5  Li
             :,   RUN    1
             00 (>(•!  R ADD IT
               Ci:D) L- 4
U)
       ER  739,A5 MM 110(29.12  IN  !!G)
   JJLOUFR /HE !'•• MM, 1-120 (IN,  1120)
   Si PWrK1 INLET I"' MM, 1120(IN.  1120)
   ;•••,- uwER INLET TEMP, DEO,  C(DEG.  F>
   !;U;UER REV'Oi [1TIONS
   TOT FLOW STlj, CU, hETREC(GCF>
   i-!C  CAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPH
   !!C  SCKGRD MFTLR/RANGF/r'PM
   uO  SAHPi-i: METER/RANCE/PPH
   CO  RCKGRfi rtF.TF.R/RANG!:/PPH
   i' n o r A M PI r M n' T r r> / r« /i > i r: f /' p r T
   UUt. vTinf LL ML.. It. U/ IVHITL.U-/ I L- I
   C02 liCKGRD flf-TER/RANGr/PCT
   NOX CAMPLI: .MLTER/RANGE/PPH
   Nnx ;.(:;Kf"i!Vn firTCR/RAfJGiVPPri
   nti.U'i'lUN FACTOR
   iiP  CDNCrwTRATION PI'-'H
n  CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
i   C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRAI'ION PPri
   CO  MASb' GRAMS

   NOX MAOO CR'ArtC
   RART1CJLATF MAGG  GRAMS
        VOL  (GCM)
        SAM  DL.R  (80M)
        KH   (MEASURED)
        DIOXIDE*
                         MM IIG
                         0/KG
                         DEG C
                          G/KM
                         L/100KM
85 KPI-! VEHICLE  EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 11-5030-003

     VEHICLE  N0..1
     DATE     5/ 6/31
     DAG CART NO,   1
     HYNO  NO,      2
     CVS NO,    3.

     DRY BULB TEMP,  25,6 DEG C(70,0  DEC  F)
     A.OS,  HUMIDITY 10,5 GM/KG

        05  K

    716,3  (20,2)
    574,0  (22,6)
     40,0  (104,0)
       16407,
    157,3  ( 5624.)
    52,7/127  105,
     5,4/  It    5,
TEST WEIGHT   1021,  KG( 2250, I.BS)
ACTUAL ROAD  LOAD   5.4 KW(  7,3 ,'•[,'
DIECEL    Eh 473' \
ODOMETER  2992,  KM(  1059, MILES)
                                                                                                NOX HUMIDITY  CORRECTION FACTOR    ,99
                                                   43,47 3/
                                                    3,0/ 3/  ,05
                                                             35,
                                                              1,
    35,27
      1,1/  2/
         1.7,50
         100,
         139,
          ,70
         34,2
          9.?1
         25,85
        2035,7
          3,70
         4 OC,
      ,943 <  ,920)
     1,000 (  ,977)
        159,3
        34,00
        14.30

      473005
        739,i
         i 0.5
         25,6
         142,4
! i Y D R u C A R !"f 0 N C- y.         G / K M
r^RFOr. MOr-IOXiDE?      G/K(1
ox-inr1'; or NITROGEN*   G/KM
                                                           ,64
                                                          1,81
                                                           .72

-------
   HC
   \IC
   CO
   CO
 TEST  NO,   473F06   RUN   2
 VEHICLE MODEL   80 VW  RABBIT
 ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, CID) L-4
 TRANSMISSION M4

 BAROMETER 739,39 MM HG(29,11 IN HG)
 RELATIVE HUMIDITY  47, PCT
 BAG RESULTS
    BAG NUMBER
    DESCRIPTION

    DLOUER DIF P MM, H20(IN, 1-120)
    BLOWER INLET P MM,  H20
-------
TEST NO,   473M07   RUN   2
VEHICLE MODEL   00 VW RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, GIB) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 739,90 MM HG(29,i3 IN
RELATIVE HUI'/HUTY  -42* PCT
DAG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE
                                HO)
 n
    BLOWER
    BLOWER
    BLOWER
    BLOWER
          DIF r
          INLET
          INLPT TEMP,
          REl'fiLUTJONS
             MM, H20
-------
TEST NO,   4731-100   RUN   3
VEHICLE MODEL   80 VU RABBIT
ENGINE'1,5 L( 90, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION H4
BAROMETER 737,62 MM HO (29, 04 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  56, PCT
BAG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE

   BLOUER DIE P MM. H2Q(IN. 1-120)
   BLOWER INLET P MM,  H20(JN, H20)
   KIJ3UER INLET TEMP,  BEG, C(BEG, F)
   fil.nWER REVOLUTIONS
   THT H.CW STD, CLU METRES (SCF)
   Hi:  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   HC  BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   i:0  PCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   i:02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
   CO? BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
   NOX GAMPIE METER/RANGE/PPM
   NQX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   DILUTION FACTOR
HC
CO
C02
NOX
HC
CO
C02
NOX
RUN
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
CONCENTRATION
                     PPM
                     PPM
                     PCT
                     PPM
     GRAMS
       MASS
       MASS
       MASS GRAMS
       TIME             SECONDS
        DFC* WET (DRY)
        SCF, WET (DRY)
        VOL (SCM)
        SAM BLR (SCM)
        KM  (MEASURED)
   TEST NUMBER*
   BAROMETER*            MM HG
   HUMIDITY?             G/KG
   TEMPERATURE*          BEG C
    CARBON DIOXIDE*       G/KM
   FUEL CONSUMPTION*     L/100KM

   HYDROCARBONSy         G/KM
   CARBON  MONOXIDE*      G/KM
   OXIDES  OF NITROGEN*   G/KM
HFET   VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 11-5830-003

     VEHICLE NO.l
     DATE    5/ 0/01
     DAG CART NO,  1
     DYNO NO,      2
     CVS NO,   3

     DRY BULB TEMP, 25,0 DEG C(77»0 BEG F)
     ADS, HUMIDITY 11.5 GM/KG

        HFET

    711,2 (28,0)
    571,5 (22,5)
     38.3 (101,0)
       21014,
    202,2 ( 7141,)
    29.0/13/ 116.
     4,3/ I/   5,
    55.7/12/ 120,
     3.7/12/   7,
    39,I/ 3/  ,66
     2,9/ 3/  ,04
    20,3/ 2/  28,
       ,5/ 2/   1,
        19,58
        112,
        110.
         .62
        27,8
        13.02
        25,93
       2291,7
        11,05
        765,
     .949 ( ,932)
    1,000 ( ,976)
       202,2
       43.44
       16,40

      473H08
       737.6
        11.5
        25.0
        139.7
        5.69

         .79
        1,58
         ,67
                                                                                      TEST WEIGHT  1021, K'G( 2250, LBS)
                                                                                      ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5,4 KU(  7,3 HP)
                                                                                      DIESEL    EH--473--F
                                                                                      ODOMETER  3109. KM< 1932. MILES)
                                                                                      NOX HUMIIHTY CORRECTION FACTOR  1,03

-------
TEST NO,   473305   RUN   1
VEHICLE MODF.L   00 VU RAPBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, CID) I.-4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 739,65 MM HG(29,12 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  50,  PCT
BAG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE

   BLOWER DIE P MM, H20(IN, M20)
   BLOWER INLET P MM,  H20(IN,  H20)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP,  DEG, C(OEG, F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   TOT FLOW STD, CD, METRES(SCF)
   '-1C  SAMPLE MFTER/RANGE/PPH
   HC  FiCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   CD  SAMPLE METER/RANCE/FFM
   CO  BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PPM
   CU2 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
   C0:> FCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
   NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   NOX. BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   IHLUrtON FACTOR
    HC
    DO
    C02
    NOX
    HC
    CO
    CO?
    NOX
    CONCENTRATION PPM
    CONCENTRATION PPM
    CONCENTRATION PCT
    CONCENTRATION PPM
    MASS GRAMS
    MASS GRAMS
    MASS GRAMS
    MASS CRAMS
PARTICIPATE MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME             SECONDS
     DFC* WET (DRY)
     SCFi- WET (DRY)
     VOL (SCM)
     SAM BLR (SCM)
     KM  (MEASURED)

TEST NUMBER>
BAROMETER*           MM HG
HUMIDITY*            G/KG
TEMPERATURE,         DEG C
 CARBON DIOXIDE,      G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION,    L/100KM

HYDROCARBONS,         G/KM
CARKQN MONOXIDE*     G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN?   G/KM
                                             85 KPH VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
                                                     PROJECT 11--5830--003

                                                  VEHICLE NO.l
                                                  DATE    5/ A/01
                                                  DAG CART NO,  1
                                                  DYNO NO,      2
                                                  CVS NO,   3

                                                  DRY BULB TEMP, 25,6 DEG C(78,0 DEG F)
                                                  ABC, HUMIDITY 10,5 DM/KG

                                                     85 K

                                                 716,3 (28,2)
                                                 574.0 (22,6)
                                                  40,0 (104,0)
                                                    16437,
                                                 159,3 (  5624,)
                                                 52,7/12/ 105,
                                                  5.4/ I/   5,
                                                 64,7/12/ 144,
                                                                                             TEST WEIGHT  1021. KG( 2250, LBS)
                                                                                             ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5,4 KW(  7,3 HP)
                                                                                             DIESEL    EM-473-F
                                                                                             ODOMETER  2992, KM( 1059, MILES)
                                                                                             NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR    ,99
43,4/ 3/  ,74
 3,0/ 3/  ,05
35,2/ 2/  35,
 1,1/ 2/   1,
    17,50
    100,
    139,
     .70
    34,2
     9,21
    25,85
   2035,7
    10,33
     3,70
    600,
 ,943 (  ,920)
1,000 (  ,977)
   159,3
   34,08
   14,30

  473805
   739,6
    10,5
    25,6
    142,4
    5,7?

     ,64
    1,81
     ,72

-------
  TEST  NO,    474F01    RUN   1
  VEHICLE  MODEL    80  VW RABBIT
  ENGINE  1,5  L(  90, CID)  L~4
  TRANSMISSION M4

  BAROMETER 742,70 MM HG(29,24  IN  HB)
  RELATIVE HUMIDITY   35,  PCT
  BAG RESULTS
    BAG NUMBER
    DESCRIPTION
     BLOWER  DIP  P  MM,  H20CIN,  H20)
     BLOWER  INLET  P  MM,  H20(IN,  1-120)
     BLOUER  INLET  TEMP,  DEG,  C(DEG, F)
     BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
     TOT  FLOW  STD, CU, METRES(SCF)
     HC   SAMPLE  METER/RANGE/PPM
     HC   BCKGRD  METER/RANGE/PPM
     CO   SAMPLE  METER/RANGE/PPM
     CO   BCKGRD  METER/RANGE/PPM
     C02  SAMPLE  METER/RANGE/PCT
     C02  BCKGRD  METER/RANGE/PCT
     NOX  SAMPLE  METER/RANGE/PPM
     NOX  BCKGRD  METER/RANGE/PPM
     DILUTION  FACTOR
     HC   CONCENTRATION PPM
     CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
     C02  CONCENTRATION PCT
     NOX  CONCENTRATION PPM
     HC   MASS  GRAMS
     CO   MASS  GRAMS
     C02  MASS  GRAMS
     NOX  MASS  GRAMS
     PARTICULATE MASS  GRAMS

     HC   GRAMS/KM
     CO   GRAMS/KM
     C02  GRAMS/KM
     NOX  GRAMS/KM
     FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM
n
w
00
    RUN TIME             SECONDS
    MEASURED DISTANCE    KM
    SCF» DRY
         DFCr WET (DRY)
         SCFr WET (DRY)
         VOL (SCM)
         SAM BLR (SCM)
         KM  (MEASURED)
         FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM

COMPOSITE RESULTS
    TEST NUMBER        474F01
    BAROMETER    MM HG  742,7
    HUMIDITY     G/KG     7,9
    TEMPERATURE  DEG C   26.7
                                                 FTP    VEHICLE  EMISSIONS  RESULTS
                                                         PROJECT 05-5830-003

                                                      VEHICLE N0,l
                                                      BATE    5/19/81
                                                      BAG CART NO,  1 /  CVS NO.   3
                                                      DYNO NO,    ,2

                                                      DRY BULB TEMP, 26,7  DEG C(80,0  DEG  F)
                                                      ABS,  HUMIDITY 7,9 GM/KG
TEST WEIGHT  1021,
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD
DIESEL    EM-474-F
ODOMETER  3264, KM(
K6( 2250, LBS)
4,0 KW(  5,3 HP)

 2028, MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR   ,91
1
lOLD TRANSIENT
706,1 (27,8)
571,5 (22,5)
35,6 ( 96,0)
13872,
136,1 ( 4806,)
20.2/12/ 40.
4,2/ I/ 4,
57.2/13/ 55,
1.5/13/ 1.
29, 5/ 3/ ,49
3, 1/ 3/ ,05
20, I/ 2/ 20,
,6/ 2/ 1,
27,01
36,
52.
.44
19,5
2.85
8,26
1099,2
4,65
2,57
,49
1,43
190,2
,80
7,03
505,
5,78
.984
.972 (
1.000 (






2
STABILIZED
701,0 (27,6)
574,0 (22,6)
33,9 ( 93,0)
23S20,
234,4 ( 8277,)
8.6/12/ 17,
4,4/ I/ 4,
24, 9/1 3/ 23,
1.1/13/ 1,
18. 2/ 3/ .29
3, 1/ 3/ ,05
12, 6/ 2/ 13,
,7/ 2/ 1,
45,40
13,
21,
,24
11,9
1,74
5,85
1050,6
4,88
1,52
,28
,94
169,7
.79
6.24
868,
6,19
,986
,961)
,985)
370,5
79,73
11,97
6,62

CARBON
3
HOT TRANSIENT
706.1 (27,8)
571,5 (22,5)
36,1 ( 97,0)
13867,
135,9 ( 4800,)
17.5/12/ 35,
4,4/ I/ 4,
53.5/13/ 51.
.7/13/ 1,
26. 4/ 3/ ,43
3.2/ 3/ ,05
19, 4/ 2/ 19,
,7/ 2/ 1,
30,42
31,
49.
.38
18,7
2.41
7,78
957,2
4,45
1,95
,42
1,34
165,3
,77
6,12
505,
5,79
.985
.974 (
1.000 (





DIOXIDE G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS (THC) G/KM


CARBON
OXIDES
MONOXIDE G/KM
OF NITROGEN G/KM
PARTICULATES G/KM
4
STABILIZED
698,5 (27,5)
571,5 (22,5)
34,4 ( 94,0)
23821,
234,2 ( 8269,)
8.7/12/ 17,
4,2/ I/ 4,
26.5/13/ 24.
.8/13/ 1,
17, 8/ 3/ ,28
3,2/ 3/ ,05
12, 8/ 2/ 13,
,9/ 2/ 1,
46.43
13,
23,
,24
11.9
1.81
6,31
1014,2
4,88
1,51
,29
1.01
162,7
,78
5,99
868,
6,23
,986
,963)
,985)
370,1
79,66
12,03
6,05
3-BAG (4-BAG)
172,7 ( 170,7)
6.37 ( 6,30)
,36 ( ,36)
1,15 ( 1.17)
,79 ( .78)
,312 ( .311)

-------
TEST NO,   4741-102   RUN   1
VEHICLE MODEL   CO VW RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L< 90, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 743,46 MM HG(29,27 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  34, PCT
BAG  RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE
    BLOWER  DIP P MM, H20(IN, H20)
    BLOWER  INLET P  MM,  H20(IN.  H20)
    BLOWER  INLET TEMP,  DEC, C(DEG, F)
    BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
    TOT  FLOW  STD, CU, METRES (SCF)
    HC   SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
    HC   BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
    CO   SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
    CO   BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
    C02  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
    C02  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
    NOX  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
    NOX  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
    DILUTION  FACTOR
    HC   CONCENTRATION  PPM
    CO   CONCENTRATION  PPM
    C02  CONCENTRATION  PCT
    NOX  CONCENTRATION  PPM
    HC   MASS  GRAMS
    CO   MASS  GRAMS
    C02  MASS  GRAMS
    NOX  MASS  GRAMS
    PARTICIPATE  MASS GRAMS
    RUN  TIME              SECONDS
         DFC? WET  (DRY)
         SCF> WET  (DRY)
         VOL  (SCM)
         SAM  BLR (SCM)
         KM  (MEASURED)
n

OJ
    TEST NUMBER>
    BAROMETER?            MM HG
    HUMIDITY?             0/KS
    TEMPERATURE/          DEC C
     CARDON DIOXIDE?      G/KM
    FUEL CONSUMPTION?     L/iOOKM

    HYDROCARBONS?         G/KM
    CARDON MONOXIDE?     G/KM
    OXIDES OF  NITROGEN*   G/KM
MFET   VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 05-5830-003

     VEHICLE NO,01
     DATE    5/19/81
     BAG CART NO,  1
     DYNO NO,      2
     CVS NO,   3

     DRY BULB TEMP, 25,6 DEG C(78,0 DEG F)
     ABS, HUMIDITY  7,0 CM/KG

        HFET

    696,0 (27,4)
    569,0 (22.4)
     37,2 ( 99,0)
       21008,
    205,8 ( 7268,)
    16.7/13/  67,
     4,2/ I/   4,
    48,A/12/ 102,
      .2/13/   0,
    40,O/ 3/  .68
     2,9/ 3/  .04
    38,6/ 2/  39.
      ,6/ 2/   1,
         19,30
         63,
         100,
         .64
         38,0
         7,48
         23,92
       2395,4
         13,35
         5,85
         765,
     ,940  (  ,938)
    1,000  (  ,983)
       205,8
       44,07
       16,44

      474H02
       743,5
         7.0
         25,6
         145,7
         5,42

         ,45
         1.46
         ,01
                                                                                             TEST  WEIGHT  1021.  KG(  2250,  LBS)
                                                                                             ACTUAL  ROAD LOAD   4,0  KW(   5,3 IIP)
                                                                                             DIESEL     EM-474-F
                                                                                             ODOMETER  3289.  KM( 2044.  MILES)
                                                                                             NOX  HUMIDITY  CORRECTION FACTOR   .89

-------
TEST NO,   474103   RUN   1
VEHICLE MODEL   00 VW RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 743.20 MM HG(29,26 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  32, PCT
BAG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE

   BLOWER DIF P MM, H20(IN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET P MM, H20(IN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP, DEG, C(DEG, F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   TOT FLOW STD, CU, METRES(SCF)
   HC  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   HC  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
   C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
   NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   DILUTION FACTOR
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
o  CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
'   C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
o  NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
   HC  MAES GRAMS
   CO  MASS GRAMS
   C02 MASS GRAMS
   NOX MASS GRAMS
   PARTICULATE MASS GRAMS
   RUN TIME             SECONDS
        DFC» WET (DRY)
        SCF* WET (DRY)
        VOL (SCM)
        SAM BLR (SCM)
        KM  (MEASURED)

   TEST NUMBER,
   BAROMETERc            MM HG
   HUMIDITYr            G/KG
   TEMPERATURE>          DEG C
    CARBON DIOXIDE/       G/KM
   FUEL CONSUMPTION*     L/100KM

   HYDROCARBONSy         G/KM
   CARBON  MONOXIDE?      G/KM
   OXIDES  OF NITROGEN,   G/KM
IDLE   VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 05-5030-003

     VEHICLE NO.l
     DATE    5/19/81
     BAG CART NO,  1
     DYNO NO.     ,2
     CVS NO,   3

     DRY BULB TEMP, 26,7 DEG C(80,0 DEG F)
     ADS, HUMIDITY 7,2 GM/KG

        IDLE

    711,2 (28.0)
    579,1 (22,8)
     33,9 (  93,0)
       32923,
    324,3 (11450,)
     8.6/12/  17,
     4,4/ I/   4,
    22.1/13/  20.
      .5/13/   0.
     7.I/ 3/  .11
     2,9/ 3/  ,04
     4,0/ 2/   4.
      ,3/ 2/   0,
       117,84
         13,
         19.
         .07
         3.7
         2.41
         7.35
        391.9
         2,06
          ,38
       1200,
     ,992 (  ,981)
    1,000 (  ,989)
       324,3
       69,47
                                                      474103
                                                       743,2
                                                         7,2
                                                        26,7
                                                                                             TEST WEIGHT  1021, KG< 2250, LBS)
                                                                                             ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   4,0 KW(  5,3 HP)
                                                                                             DIESEL    EM-474-F
                                                                                             ODOMETER  3306. KM( 2054. MILES)
                                                                                             NOX  HUMIDITY  CORRECTION FACTOR   ,90

-------
                                                50 KPH VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
                                                        PROJECT 05-5830-003
TEST NO,   474504   RUN   1
VEHICLE MODEL   00 VU RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 743,46 MM HG<29.27 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  36.  PCT
SAG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE

   BLOWER DIP P MM, H20(IN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET P MM,  H20(IN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP,  DEG. C(DEG, F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   TOT FLOW STD, CU. METRES(SCF)
   HC  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   HC  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  DCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
   C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
   NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   DILUTION FACTOR
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
 " C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
 A NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 ^ HC  MASS GRAMS
   CO  MASS GRAMS
   C02 MASS GRAMS
   NOX MASS GRAMS
   PARTICULATE  MASS GRAMS
   RUN TIME             SECONDS
        DFCy UET (DRY)
        SCF* WET (DRY)
        VOL (SCM)
        SAM BLR  (SCM)
        KM  (MEASURED)

   TEST NUMBER*
   BAROMETER*           MM HG
   HUMIDITY*            G/KG
   TEMPERATURE*         DEG C
    CARBON DIOXIDE>      G/KM
   FUEL CONSUMPTION*    L/100KM

   HYDROCARBONS*        G/KM
   CARBON MONOXIDE*     G/KM
   OXIDES OF NITROGEN*  G/KM
 VEHICLE NO.l
 DATE    5/19/81
 BAG CART NO,  1
 DYNO NO,      2
 CVS NO,   3

 DRY BULB TEMP, 25,0 DEG C(77,0 DEG F)
 ABS. HUMIDITY  7,3 GM/KG

    50 K

696.0 (27,4)
569,0 (22,4)
 35,6 (  96,0)
   16472,
161,9 (  5717.)
22.3/12/  45,
                                                                                             TEST WEIGHT  1021,
                                                                                             ACTUAL ROAD LOAD
                                                                                             DIESEL    EM-474-F
                                                                                             ODOMETER  3306,  KH( 2054,  MILES)
KG( 2250. LBS)
4,0 KU(  5,3 HP)
                                                                                             NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR   ,90
4,0/ I/
25, 6/1 3/
,6/13/
21, 6/ 3/
3,0/ 3/
.13, 0/ 2/
,3/ 2/
37,68
41,
22,
,30
12,7
3,79
4,24
901,8
3,53
1,16
600,
,973 ( ,
1,000 ( ,
161,9
34,67
8,36
474504
743.5
7,3
25,0
107,9
3,99
,45
,51
,42
4,
23,
1.
,35
,05
13,
0,











962)
985)













-------
 TEST  NO,    474805    RUN    1
 VEHICLE  MODEL    00  VW  RABBIT
 ENGINE 1,5  L(  90, CID) L-4
 TRANSMISSION M4
 BAROMETER  743,46  MM  HG(29,27  IN  HG)
 RELATIVE HUMIDITY 42,  PCT
 BAG  RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE

   RLOWER  DIP  P MM.  I-I20(IN, H20)
   BLOWER  INLET P MM, H20(IN.  H20)
   BLOWER  INLET TEMP, DEG,  C(DEG,  F)
   BLOUER  REVOLUTIONS
   TOT FLOW STD,  CU, METRES(SCF)
       SAMPLE  METER/RANGE/PPM
       BCKGRD  METER/RANGE/PPM
       SAMPLE  METER/RANGE/PPM
       BCKGRD  METER/RANGE/PPM
n
HC
HC
CO
CO
C02
        3AMPLE  METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC  CONCENTRATION  PPM
CO  CONCENTRATION  PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION  PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION  PPM
HC  MASS GRAMS
CO  MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
PARTICULATE MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME             SECONDS
     DFCy UET (DRY)
     SCF> WET (DRY)
     VOL (SCM)
     SAM BLR (SCM)
     KM  (MEASURED)

TEST NUMBERt
BAROMETERr           MM HG
HUMIDITYr            G/KG
TEMPERATURE*         DEG C
 CARBON DIOXIDE>       G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION*    L/100KM

HYDROCARBONS?         G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDEy      G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN*  G/KM
85 KPH VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 05-5830-003

     VEHICLE NO.i
     DATE    5/19/81
     BAG CART NO,  1
     BYNO NO,      2
     CVS NO,   3

     DRY BULB TEMP,  24,4 DEG C<76,0 DEG F)
     ABS, HUMIDITY  0,2 GM/KG

        85 K

    696,0 (27,4)
    569,0 (22,4)
     37.8 (100,0)
       16480,
    161.2 ( 5693.)
    25.4/13/ 101,
     4.4/ I/   4,
    63.4/12/ 141,
                                                                                          TEST WEIGHT  1025, KG( 2260, L.BS)
                                                                                          ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   4,0 KW(  5,3 HP)
                                                                                          DIESEL    EM-474-F
                                                                                          ODOMETER  3315, KM( 2060, MILES)
                                                                                          NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR    ,92
    44, 3/ 3/  ,76
     2,9/ 3/  ,04
    46, 7/ 2/  47,
      ,5/ 2/   1,
        17.13
         97,
        136,
         .72
        46.2
         9,04
        25.58
       2115,3
        13,15
         6,60
        600.
     ,942 ( .929)
    1,000 ( .980)
       161,2
       34,46
       14,27

      474805
       743,5
         8,2
        24,4
        148,2
        5,55

         ,63
        1,79
         ,92

-------
 TEST  NO,    474F03    RUN   3
 VEHICLE MODEL   SO VW RABBIT
 ENGINE  1,5  L( 90,  CID)  L-4
 TRANSMISSION M4

 BAROMETER 737,07 MM HO(29.05 IN HG)
 RELATIVE HUMIDITY  50,  PCT
 FAG RESULTS
    BAG NUMBER
    DESCRIPTION
BLOWER BIF P MM,  H20(IN,  H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM, H20(IN, H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP, BEG,  C(BEG,  F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STB, CU, METRES(SCF)
HC  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
    MASS CRAMS
o
>£.
CO
    HC
    CO
    MASS
    C02 MASS GRAMS
    NOX MAGS GRAMS
    PARTICIPATE MASS GRAMS
    HC  GRAMS/KM
    CO  GRAMS/KM
    C02 GRAMS/KM
    NOX GRAMS/KM
    FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM

    RUN TIME             SECONDS
    MEASURED DISTANCE    KM
    SCF-% BRY
         DFC» UET (DRY)
         SCFf UET (BRY)
         VOL (SCM)
         SAM BLR (SCM)
         KM  (MEASURED)
         FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
COMPOSITE RESULTS
    TEST NUMBER        474F08
    BAROMETER    MM KG  737,9
    HUMIDITY     G/KG    11,0
    TEMPERATURE  BEG C   26,1
                                             FTP    VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
                                                     PROJECT 05-5030-003

                                                  VEHICLE NO.l
                                                  DATE    5/22/8.1
                                                  BAG CART NO, 1 / CVS NO,   3
                                                  DYNO NO,  •'   2

                                                  DRY BULB TEMP, 26,1 BEG C(79,0 DEC F)
                                                  ABS, HUMIDITY 11,0 GM/KG
 TEST WEIGHT  102.1, KG( 2250, LBS)
 ACTUAL. ROAD LOAD   4,0 KW(  5,3 HP)
 DIESEL    EM-474-F
 ODOMETER  3344, KM( 2078, MILES)
 NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR  1,01
       1
COLD TRANSIENT
                                                                       STABILIZED
      3
HOT TRANSIENT
STABILIZED
693,4 (27,3)
561,3 (22,1)
34,4 ( 94,0)
13870,
134,7 ( 4758,)
20.6/12/ 41,
4,4/ I/ 4,
62.5/13/ 60,
1.1/13/ 1,
30, O/ 3/ ,50
4,5/ 3/ ,07
20, 5/ 2/ 21,
, 5/ 2/ 1 ,
26,50
37,
58.
,43
20,0
2,07
9,04
1058,5
5,21
2,7.1
,50
1,57
184,0
,9.1
6,82
505,
5,75
,979
,972 (
1.000 (






693,4 (27,3)
563,9 (22,2)
34,4 ( 94,0)
23823,
231,4 ( 8170.)
9,1/12/ 18,
5,0/ I/ 5,
28.0/13/ 26,
1.1/13/ 1,
18, 3/ 3/ ,29
3,7/ 3/ ,06
14, I/ 2/ 14,
,8/ 2/ 1,
45,07
13,
25,
,24
13,3
1,78
6,71
1005,8
5,95
1,55
,29
1,08
162,2
,96
5,98
868,
6,20
,981
,956)
,980)
366.1
77.88
11.95
6,38

CARBON
696,0 (27,4)
563,9 (22.2)
36,7 ( 98,0)
13G48.
134.0 ( 4732.)
20.2/12/ 40,
5.0/ I/ 5.
5R.6/13/ 56,
1.0/13/ 1,
26, I/ 3/ ,43
4,3/ 3/ ,07
19, ?./ 2/ 19,
,7/ 2/ 1.
30,71
35,
54.
,36
18,5
2,74
8,39
890,4
4,79
2,13
,48
1,46
154,7
,03
5,75
505,
5,76
,980
.975 (
1.000 (





DIOXIDE G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS  G/KM


CARBON
OXIDES
MONOXIDE G/KH
OF NITROGEN G/KM
PARTICULATES G/K«
693,4 (27,3)
563.9 (22.2)
35,6 ( 96,0)
23822,
230,9 ( 8155,)
9.1/12/ 18,
4,4/ I/ 4,
27,5/13/ 25,
1.1/13/ 1,
17, 5/ 3/ ,28
3,9/ 3/ ,06
13, 6/ 2/ 14,
,7/ 2/ 1,
47,23
14,
24,
,22
12,~9
1,84
6,37
934 , 0
5.76
1,45
,30
1,04
152,0
,94
5,61
868,
6.14
,981
.959)
.981)
365,0
77,83
11,90
5,67
3-BAG (4-BAG)
164,7 ( 161,6)
6,09 ( 5,98)
,38 ( ,39)
1,29 ( 1,27)
,91 ( ,91)
,328 ( .324)

-------
                                                HFET   VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
TEST NO,   474H09   RUN   3
VEHICLE MODEL   80 VW RABBIT
ENGINE 1.5 L( 90, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
 BAROMETER 737,11  MM 1-10(29,02  IN  HO)
 RELATIVE HUMIDITY  53,  PCT
 BAG RESULTS
    TEST CYCLE

    BLOWER BIF  P MM* H20(IN, H20)
    BLOWER INLET P MM,  H20(IN.  M20)
    BLOWER INLET TEMP,  BEG,  C(BEG,  F)
    BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
    TOT FLOW STB,  CU, METRES(SCF)
    HC   SAMPLE  METER/RANGE/PPM
    HC   BCKGRD  METER/RANGE/PPM
    CO   SAMPLE  METER/RANGE/PPM
    CO   BCKGRD  METER/RANGE/PPM
    C02 SAMPLE  METER/RANGE/PCT
    C02 BCKGRD  METER/RANGE/PCT
    NOX SAMPLE  METER/RANGE/PPM
    NOX BCKGRD  METER/RANGE/PPM
    DILUTION FACTOR
    HC   CONCENTRATION PPM
?   CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
iL   C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
^   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
    HC   MASS GRAMS
    CO   MASS GRAMS
    C02 MASS GRAMS
    NOX MASS GRAMS
    PARTICULATE MASS GRAMS
    RUN TIME             SECONDS
         BFCv WET  (BRY)
         SCFf UET  (BRY)
         VOL (SCM)
         SAM BLR (SCM)
         KM   (MEASURED)

    TEST  NUMBER>
    BAROMETERy           MM MG
    HUMIDITYf            G/KG
    TEMPERATURE*         DEO C
    CARBON  DIOXIDE*      G/KM
    FUEL  CONSUMPTION*    L/100KM

    HYDROCARBONS,        G/KM
    CARBON MONOXIDE?     G/KM
   OXIDES OF NITROGENr   G/KM
 VEHICLE NO.l
 DATE    5/22/81
 BAG CART NO,  1
 DYNO NO,  •'   2
 CVS NO,   3

 BRY BULB TEMP, 25,6 BEG C(78,0 BEG F)
 ABS, HUMIDITY 11,3 GM/KG

    HFET

£93,4 (27,3)
563,9 (22,2)
 39,4 (103,0)
   21016.
201,8 ( 7126.)
17.4/13/  69,
 4,4/ I/   4,
48.9/12/ 103,
          .70
          .06
          37.
                                                                                             TEST WEIGHT  1021. KG( 2250, LBS)
                                                                                             ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   4,0 KU(  5,3 HP)
                                                                                             DIESEL    EM-474-F
                                                                                             ODOMETER  3368, KM( 2093. MILES)
                                                                                             NOX  HUMIDITY  CORRECTION  FACTOR  1,02
                                                    41, 3/ 3/
                                                     3,8/ 3/
                                                    37, I/ 2/
                                                      .8/ 2/
                                                        18,64
                                                         65,
                                                         99.
                                                         ,65
                                                         7,59
                                                        23.34
                                                       2389.9
                                                        14,28
                                                         5,56
                                                        765,
                                                     ,946 (  .930)
                                                    1,000 (  .976)
                                                       201,8
                                                       43,05
                                                       16,52

                                                      474H09
                                                       737,1
                                                        11,3
                                                        25,6
                                                        144,7
                                                        5.38

                                                         ,46
                                                        1,41
                                                         ,86

-------
TEST NO,   474F06   RUN   2
VEHICLE MODEL   80 VU RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L.( 90, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION H4

BAROMETER 740,41 MM HG(29,15 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  43, PCT
BAG RESULTS
   BAG NUMBER
   DESCRIPTION

   BLOWER DIF P MM, H2Q
-------
TEST NO,   474H07   RUN   2
VEHICLE MODEL   80 VU RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M5
BAROMETER 739,65 MM HG(29,12 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  46, PCT
DAG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE

   BLOWER DIP P MM, H20(IN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET P MM, H20(IN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP, DEC,  C(DEG,  F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   TOT FLOW STD,  CU,  METRES(SCF)
   HC
   HC
   CO
   CO
   CO?
     SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
     BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
     SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
     BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
     SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC   CONCENTRATION PPM
CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
C02  CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX  CONCENTRATION PPM
HC   MASS GRAMS
CO   MASS GRAMS
C02  MASS GRAMS
NOX  MASS GRAMS
PARTICIPATE MASS GRAMS
RUN  TIME             SECONDS
     DFCr WET (DRY)
     SCFf WET (DRY)
     VOL (SCM)
     SAM BLR (SCM)
     KM  (MEASURED)

TEST NUMBERF
BAROMETERr           MM HG
HUMIDITY*            G/K6
TEMPERATURE,          DEC C
 CARBON DIOXIDE*       G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION?    L/100KM

HYDROCARBONSr         G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDEF      G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGENr   G/KM
HFET   VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 05-5830-003

     VEHICLE NO,
     DATE    5/15/01
     BAG CART NO,   1
     DYNO NO,      2
     CVS NO,   3'

     DRY BULB TEMP, 25.6 DEG C(78,0 DEC P)
     ABS, HUMIDITY  9,8 GM/KG

        HFET

    696.0 (27,4)
    569,0 (22,4)
     37,8 (100,0)
       21006.
    204,3 (  7215.)
    17.9/13/  72,
     4,4/ I/   4.
    95.0/13/  96,
      ,5/13/   0,
    39,7/ 3/  ,67
     2.9/ 3/  ,04
    37,3/ 2/  37,
      ,5/ 2/   1,
        19,46
         67,
         93,
         ,63
        36,8
         7,95
        22,17
       2357,2
        13,96
         5,71
        765,
     ,949 (  ,934)
    1.000 (  ,979)
       204,3
       43,60
       16,46

      474H07
       739,6
         9,8
        25,6
        143,2
        5,33

         ,43
        1,35
         ,85
                                                                                           TEST WEIGHT   1021,
                                                                                           ACTUAL ROAD LOAD
                                                                                           DIESEL    EM-474-F
                                                                                           ODOMETER  3232, KM(
KG( 2250, LDS)
3,9 KU(  5,2 HP)

 2008, MILES)
                                                                                          NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION  FACTOR    ,97

-------
TEST  NO,    476F01    RUN   1
VEHICLE  MODEL   80 VU RABBIT
ENGINE  1,5  L( 90,  CID)  L--4
TRANSMISSION M4

BAROMETER 737,62 MM HG(29,04 IN HG)
 RELATIVE HUMIDITY  49,  PCT
 BAG RESULTS
    BAG NUMBER
    DESCRIPTION

    BLOWER DIF P MM, H20(IN,  H20)
    BLOWER INLET P MM, H20(IN, H20)
    BLOWER INLET TEMP, BEG. C(DEG.  F)
    BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
    TOT FLOW STD, CU, METRES(SCF)
    HC  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
    HC  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
    CO  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
    CO  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
    C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
    C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
    NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
    NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
    DILUTION  FACTOR
    HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
    CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
 o  C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
  '  NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
 -j  HC  MASS  GRAMS
    CO  MASS  GRAMS
    C02 MASS  GRAMS
    NOX MASS  GRAMS
    PARTICULATE  MASS GRAMS

    HC  GRAMS/KM
    CO  GRAMS/KM
    C02 GRAMS/KM
    NOX GRAMS/KM
    FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM

    RUN TIME             SECONDS
    MEASURED  DISTANCE    KM
    SLTr DRY
         DFCy WET (DRY)
         SCF» WET (DRY)
         VOL  (SCM)
         SAM  BLR (SCM)
         KM   (MEASURED)
         FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM

COMPOSITE RESULTS
    TEST NUMBER        476F01
M        METER    MM HG  737,6
        Dm     G/KG    11,8
    TEMPERATURE  DEG C   27,8
FTP    VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 05-5830-003

     VEHICLE NO.l
     DATE    5/27/01
     BAG CART NO, 1 / CVS NO,  3
     DYNO NO,      2

     DRY BULB TEMP, 27,8 DEG C(82,0 DEG F)
     ABS, HUMIDITY 11,8 GM/KG
TEST WEIGHT  1021,
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD
BIESEL    EM-476--F
ODOMETER  3457, KM(
KG( 2250, LBS)
5,4 KW(  7,3 HP)

 2148, MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR  1,04
1
lOLD TRANSIENT
696,0 (27,4)
563,9 (22,2)
36,1 ( 97,0)
13856,
134,6 ( 4752,)
43,3/12/ 87,
20, 8/ I/ 21,
63,2/13/ 61,
1.2/13/ 1.
28, 5/ 3/ ,47
3,2/ 3/ ,05
14. 5/ 2/ 15.
,3/ 2/ 0,
27,71
67,
58,
.42
14,2
5,16
9,14
1039,3
3,79
1,51
,90
1,60
101,6
,66
7,35
505,
5,72
,980
,973
1,000






9
STABILIZED
690,9 (27,2)
563,9 (22,2)
35,0 ( 95,0)
23813,
231,7 ( 8183,)
23.3/12/ 47,
19, 8/ I/ 20,
36.4/13/ 34,
i.2/13/ 1.
17, 5/ 3/ ,28
2,9/ 3/ ,04
9,5/ 2/ 10.
,5/ 2/ 1,
46,62
27,
32,
.24
9.0
3,63
8.62
1001,5
4.14
1,14
,58
1,38
160,6
,66
6,48
868,
6,24
,982
( .958)
( ,981)
366.3
78,00
11.96
6.90

CARBON
3
HOT TRANSIENT
696,0 (27,4)
563,9 (22,2)
36,7 ( 98,0)
13856,
134,5 ( 4748.)
37.8/12/ 76,
19. 8/ I/ 20,
57.8/13/ 55,
,9/13/ 1,
27. 2/ 3/ ,45
3,8/ 3/ ,06
15, 2/ 2/ 15,
,8/ 2/ 1,
29,19
56,
53,
,39
14,4
4.37
8.31
959,6
3,85
1,31
,73
1.39
160,9
,64
6.51
505,
5,96
,980
.973 (
1,000 (





DIOXIDE G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS (THC) G/KM


CARBON
OXIDES
MONOXIDE G/KM
OF NITROGEN G/KM
P ARTICULATES G/KM
4
STABILIZED
690,9 (27,2)
563,9 (22,2)
36,1 ( 97,0)
23818,
231,4 ( 8169.)
24.6/12/ 49,
16, O/ I/ 16.
38.3/13/ 36,
,7/13/ 1,
18, I/ 3/ ,29
3, I/ 3/ ,05
9,9/ 2/ 10,
,8/ 2/ 1,
44,98
34,
34,
,24
9,1
4,49
9,21
1029,9
4,18
1,20
,69
1,42
159.3
,65
6,44
868,
6,47
.982
.958)
,981)
365,8
77,97
12,43
6,47
3-BAG (4-BAG)
165,0 ( 164,6)
6,67 ( 6,65)
,69 ( ,72)
1,43 < 1,44)
,66 ( ,65)
,209 ( .210)

-------
TEST NO,   476H02   RUN   1
VEHICLE MODEL   80 VW RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L( 90. CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 737,62 MM H6C29.04 IN HO)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  42, PCT
BAG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE

   BLOWER DIF P MM, H20(IN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET P MM, H20(IN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. C(DEG. F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   TOT FLOW STB, CU, METRES(SCF)
   HC  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   HC  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PPM
   C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
   CG2 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
   NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   DILUTION FACTOR
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
o  C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
!  NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
   HC  MASS GRAMS
   CO  MASS GRAMS
   C02 MASS GRAMS
   NOX MASS GRAMS
   PARTICULATE MASS GRAMS
   RUN TIME             SECONDS
        DFC»  WET (DRY)
        SCF,  WET (DRY)
        VOL (SCM)
        SAM BLR (SCM)
        KM  (MEASURED)
oo
   TEST NUMBERF
   BAROMETER*           MM HG
   HUMIDITY*             G/KG
   TEMPERATURE?          BEG C
    CARBON DIOXIDEr       G/KM
   FUEL CONSUMPTION     L/100KM

   HYDROCARBONSy         G/KM
   CARBON MONOXIDE*      G/KM
   OXIDES OF  NITROGEN*   G/KM
HFET   VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 05-5830-003

     VEHICLE NO.l
     BATE    5/27/81
     BAG CART NO,   1
     DYNO NO.      2
     CVS NO,   ,3

     DRY BULB TEMP, 30,0 DEG C(G6,0 BEG F)
     ADS, HUMIDITY 11,6 GM/KG

        HFET

    690,9 (27,2)
    563.9 (22,2)
     37.8 (100,0)
       20985,
    203,7 (  7191.)
    27.6/13/ 111.
    16.O/ I/  16.
    91.0/13/  92,
     1.0/13/   1.
    39,5/ 3/  ,67
     3,0/ 3/  .05
    25,O/ 2/  25,
      ,9/ 2/   1,
        19,46
         95,
         88,
         ,62
        24,1
        11,19
        20.96
       2329.9
         9.69
         2,95
        765,
     ,949 (  .936)
    1,000 (  ,980)
       203,7
       43,41
       16,34

      476H02
       737,6
        11,6
        30.0
        142,6
        5.77

         .69
        1.28
         ,59
                                                                                             TEST WEIGHT  1021,  KG(  2250,  LBS)
                                                                                             ACTUAL ROAD LOAB   5,4  KW(   7,3 HP)
                                                                                             DIESEL    EM-476-F
                                                                                             ODOMETER  3481,  KM( 2163,  MILES)
                                                                                             NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR  1,03

-------
TEST NO,   476103   RUN   1
VEHICLE MODEL   80 VW RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, CUD L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 737,87 MM i-IG(29,05  IN HO
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  53, PCT
BAG  RESULTS
   TEST CYLL.E

   BLOWER BIF P MM. H20(IN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET ? MM, H20(IN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP, BEG, C(BEG, F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   TOT FLOW STB, CU, METRES(SCF)
9
   i-ic
   I-IC
   CO
   CO
    SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPM
    BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
    SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPM
    BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC  MASS GRAMS
CO  MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
PARTICULATE MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME             SECONDS
     DFC» WET (DRY)
     SCF7 WET (DRY)
     VOL (SCM)
     SAM BLR (SCM)
     KM  (MEASURED)

TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER,           MM HG
HUMIDITY*            G/KG
TEMPERATURE?         DEC C
 CARBON DIOXIDE*      G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION/    L/100KM

HYDROCARBONS?        G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE*     G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN*  G/KM
IDLE   VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 05-5030-003

     VEHICLE NO.l
     DATE    5/27/81
     BAG CART NO,  1
     DYNO NO,      2
     CVS NO,   3

     DRY BULB TEMP. 25,6 BEG C(78,0 BEG F)
     ADS, HUMIDITY 11,2 GM/KG

        IDLE

    701,0 (27,6)
    571,5 (22,5)
     32.2 (  90,0)
       32923,
    322,6 (11393.)
    16.9/12/  34,
    14.2/ I/  14,
    25.2/13/  23,
     1.0/13/   1,
     7,2/ 3/  ,11
     3,2/ 3/  ,05
     3.7/ 2/   4.
      ,7/ 21   1»
       114,32
         20,
         22,
         ,06
         3,0
         3,66
         8,16
        372.2
         1,89
          ,28
       1200,
     ,991 (  ,974)
    1,000 (  ,982)
       322,6
       68.37
                                                      476103
                                                       737,9
                                                        11.2
                                                        25,6
                                                                                          TEST WEIGHT  1021, K0( 2250, LBS)
                                                                                          ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5,4 KU(  7,3 HP)
                                                                                          DIESEL    EM-476-F
                                                                                          ODOMETER  3455, KM( 2147. MILES)
                                                                                          NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR  1,02

-------
TEST NO.   476504   RUN   1
VEHICLE MODEL   80 VW RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4


BAROMETER 738,12 MM HG<29.06 IN I-IG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  50, PCT
BAG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE
   BLOWER DIP P MM, H20(IN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET P MM, H20(IN, H20)
   BLOUER INLET TEMP, BEG. C(DEG, F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   TOT FLOW STB, CU. METRES(SCF)
   HC  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   HC  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   C02 SAMPLE METER/RANBE/PCT
   C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
   NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   DILUTION FACTOR
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
   HC  MASS GRAMS
   CO  MASS GRAMS
   CU2 MASS GRAMS
   NOX MASS GRAMS
   (•'ARTICULATE MASS GRAMS
   RUN TIME
        DFCy  UET (DRY)
        SCFy  WET (DRY)
        VOL (SCM)
        SAM BLR  (SCM)
        KM   (MEASURED)
o
01
o
   TEST  NUMBERr
   BAROMETER,            MM  HG
   HUMIDITYy             G/KG
   TEMPERATURE»          DEG C
    CARBON DIOXIDE*       G/KM
   FUEL  CONSUMPTION*     L/100KM

   HYDROCARBONSr         G/KM
   CARBON MONOXIDE*      G/KM
   OXIDES OF NITROGEN*   G/KM
                                                 50 KPH VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
                                                         PROJECT 05-5830-003

                                                      VEHICLE NO.l
                                                      DATE    5/27/81
                                                      BAG CART NO,  1
                                                      DYNO NO,      2
                                                      CVS NO,   3j

                                                      DRY BULB TEMP, 26,1 BEG C(79,0 DEG F)
                                                      ADS, HUMIDITY 11,0 Gtt/KG

                                                         50 K

                                                     696.0 (27.4)
                                                     569,0 (22,4)
                                                      35,6 ( 96,0)
                                                        16474,
                                                     160.3 ( 5662,)
                                                     15.7/12/  31,
                                                     13, 6/ I/  14,
                                                     24.6/13/  22,
                                                               ,35
                                                               .06
                                                               12,
                                         TEST WEIGHT  1021. KG< 2250, LBS)
                                         ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5.4 KU(  7.3 HP)
                                         DIESEL    EM--476-F
                                         ODOMETER  3455. KM( 2147,  MILES)
                                         NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR  1,01
21,97 3/
 3,6/ 3/
11, 7/ 2/
  ,7/ 2/
    37,29
     18,
     21,
     ,30
    11,0
     1,68
     3,96
    881,7
     3,41
      ,70
    600,
 ,973 (
1,000 (
   160,3
   34,07
    8,35

  476504
   738,1
    11,0
    26.1
    105,6
    4,21

     .20
     .47
     .41
                                                              957)
                                                              980)

-------
TEST NO.   476805   RUN   1
VEHICLE MODEL   00 VW RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L< 90, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 738,12 MM HG(29.06 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  54, PCT
BAG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE
    BLOWER  BIF  P  MM, H20(IN, H20)
    BLOWER  INLET  P MM, H20(IN. H20)
    BLOWER  INLET  TEMP. BEG, C(BEG.  F)
    BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
    TOT  FLOW  STB. CU, HETRES(SCF)
    HC   SAMPLE  METER/RANGE/PPM
    HC   BCKGRB  METER/RANGE/PPM
    CO   SAMPLE  METER/RANGE/PPM
    CO   BCKGRD  METER/RANGE/PPM
    CQ2  SAMPLE  METER/RANGE/PCT
    C02  BCKGRB  METER/RANGE/PCT
    NOX  SAMPLE  METER/RANGE/PPM
    NOX  BCKGRB  METER/RANGE/PPM
    DILUTION  FACTOR
    HC   CONCENTRATION PPM
    CO   CONCENTRATION PPM
    C02  CONCENTRATION PCT
    NOX  CONCENTRATION PPM
o
 £ HC  MASS GRAMS
 M CO  MASS GRAMS
    C02 MASS GRAMS
    NOX MASS GRAMS
    PARTICULATE MASS GRAMS
    RUN TIME             SECONBS
         BFC» WET (BRY)
         SCF? WET (DRY)
         VOL. (SCM)
         SAM BLR (SCM)
         KM  (MEASURES)

    TEST NUMBER?
    BAROMETER*            MM HG
    HUMIDITY*            G/KG
    TEMPERATURE*          BEG C
     CARBON DIOXIDE?       G/KM
    FUEL CONSUMPTION*     L/100KM

    HYDROCARBONS?         G/KM
    CARBON  MONOXIDE*      G/KM
    OXIDES  OF NITROGEN/   G/KM
                                               85 KPH VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
                                                       PROJECT 05-5830-003

                                                    VEHICLE NO.l
                                                    DATE    5/27/01
                                                    BAG CART NO,  1
                                                    DYNO NO,      2
                                                    CVS NO,   3

                                                    DRY BULB TEMP, 26,1 BEG C(79,0 DEC F)
                                                    ADS. HUMIDITY 11,7 CM/KG

                                                       85 K

                                                   693,5 (27,5)
                                                   569,0 (22,4)
                                                    40,0 (104,0)
                                                      16467,
                                                   158,9 ( 5611.)
                                                   30.8/13/ 123,
                                                   13, 6/ I/  14.
                                                   49.2/12/ 104,
                                                             ,71
                                                             .05
                                                             28,
                                         TEST WEIGHT  1021. KG( 2250. LBS)
                                         ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5,4 KWC  7.3 HP)
                                         DIESEL    EM-476-F
                                         ODOMETER  3508,  KM 2180,  MILES)
                                         NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR  1,04
41, 8/ 3/
 3,3/ 3/
28, 3/ 2/
  ,7/ 2/   1,
    18,26
    110,
    100,
     ,66
    27,6
    10,10
    18,44
   1930,5
     8.69
     2,90
    600,
 ,945 ( .929)
1,000 ( ,976)
   158,9
   34,04
   14,26

  476805
   738,1
    11.7
    26,1
    135,3
    5,49

     .71
    1,29
     ,61

-------
  TEST NO,    476F06   RUN   2
  VEHICLE MODEL   00 W RABBIT
  ENGINE 1.5 L( 90, CID)  L-4
  TRANSMISSION M4

  BAROMETER 738,63 MM HG(29,08 IN I-IG)
  RELATIVE HUMIDITY  46,  PCT
  BAG RESULTS
     BAG NUMBER
     DESCRIPTION

     BLOWER DIP P MM,  H20(IN,  H20)
     BLOWER INLET P MM,  H20(IN,  H20)
     BLOWER INLET TEMP,  DEC,  C(DEG, F)
     BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
     TOT FLOW STD.  CU,  METRES(SCF)
     HC  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
     HC  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
     CO  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
     CO  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
     C02 SAMPLE METER/RANCE/PCT
         BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
         SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
     NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
     DILUTION FACTOR
     HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
     CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
     C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
     NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
                 1S
         MASS GRAMS
C02
NOX
HC
CO
     C02  MASS  GRAMS
     NOX  MASS  GRAMS
     PARTICULATE  MASS  GRAMS

     HC   GRAMS/KM
     CO   GRAMS/KM
     C02  GRAMS/KM
     NOX  GRAMS/KM
     FUEL CONSUMPTION  BY CB L/100KM

     RUN  TIME             SECONDS
     MEASURED DISTANCE   KM
     SCF, DRY
         DFCi WET (DRY)
         SCFr WET (DRY)
         VOL (SCM)
         SAM BLR (SCM)
         KM  (MEASURED)
         FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM

COMPOSITE RESULTS
    TEST NUMBER        476F06
    BAROMETER    MM HG  738,6
    HUMIDITY     G/KG    11,0
    TEMPERATURE  DEG C   27.8
                                             FTP    VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
                                                     PROJECT 05-5830-003

                                                  VEHICLE NO.l
                                                  BATE    5/28/81
                                                  BAG CART NO, 1  / CVS NO,   3
                                                  DYNO NO,      2

                                                  DRY BULB TEMP,  27,8 DEG C(82.0 DEC F)
                                                  ABS, HUMIDITY 11.0 GM/KG
                     TEST WEIGHT  1021.
                     ACTUAL ROAD LOAD
                     DIESEL    EM-476-F
                     ODOMETER  3523, KM(
                    KB( 2250, LBS)
                    5.4 KU<  7,3 HP)

                     2189, MILES)
                     NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR  1,01
                                                       1
                                                COLD TRANSIENT

                                                 696,0 (27.4)
                                                 563.9 (22.2)
                                                  37,2 (  99,0)
                                                    13861,
                                                 134,7 (  4755.)
                                                 46.2/12/  92,
  STABILIZED

696,0 (27,4)
569.0 (22.4)
 35.6 (  96.0)
   23826.
231,9 (  8190.)
15.0/12/  30,
HOT TRANSIENT

696,0 (27,4)
569,0 (22.4)
 36,7 ( 98,0)
   13859.
134,7 ( 4756,)
23.6/12/  47.
  STABILIZED

690,9 (27,2)
563,9 (22,2)
 35,0 ( 95,0)
   23827,
232,3 ( 8201.)
15.2/12/  30,
8
59

27
3
14



























,0/ I/ 8,
,7/13/ 57.
.9/13/ 1,
,9/ 3/ ,46
,4/ 3/ ,05
,!/ 2/ 14,
,4/ 2/ 0,
28,32
85,
55,
,41
13.7
6,57
8,63
1006,3
3,57
1,61
1,18
1,55
181,1
,64
7.37
505,
5,56
,981
.974
1,000






6,8/ I/ 7,
33.2/13/ 31,
«8/33/ 1,
17.4/3/ ,28
3,2/ 3/ ,05
9,4/ 2/ 9,
,4/ 2/ 0,
47,22
23,
29.
.23
9,0
3.13
7.92
975,9
4,04
1,08
,52
1.32
162,3
,67
6,53
868,
6,01
,983
( ,959)
( ,982)
366,6
77,85
11,57
6,93

CARBON
6,8/ I/ 7,
45.6/13/ 43.
,5/13/ 0,
24, 5/ 3/ ,40
3, I/ 3/ .05
12, 6/ 2/ 13,
,4/ 2/ 0,
32.86
41,
41.
.35
12.2
3.16
6.49
870.2
3,18
1.10
.56
1,15
154,1
,56
6,20
505,
5,65
,982
,976 (
1,000 (





DIOXIDE G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS (THC) G/KM




CARBON
OXIDES
MONOXIDE G/KM
OF NITROGEN G/KH
PARTICULATES G/KM
6,6/ I/
32.8/13/
,5/13/
16, 6/ 3/
2,9/ 3/
8,9/ 2/
,4/ 2/
49,55
24,
29,
.22
8.5
3,21
7,90
939,6
3,82
,98
,53
1,30
155,0
,63
6,24
868,
6,06
,983
,962)
,982)
366,9
77,83
11,71
6,22
3-BAG
163,9
6,61
,67
1,32

.207
7,
30.
0.
,26
,04
9,
0,























































(4-BAG)
( 161
( 6,
( ,
( 1,
(
.8)
53)
67)
32)
X,?i
< .202)

-------
TEST NO,   476H07   RUN   2
VEHICLE MODEL   80 VU RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 738,38 MM HG<29.07 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUH1DITY  51, PCT
BAG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE

   BLOWER DIF P MM, H20UN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET P MM, H20CIN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP, DE6,  C(DEG,  F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   TOT FLOW STB, CU, METRES(SCF)
   I-IC  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   HC  BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  DCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
   CO? BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
   NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   NfJX BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PPM
   DILUTION FACTOR
   HC  CONCENTRATION  PPM
   CD  CONCENTRATION  PPM
   C02 CONCENTRATION  PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION  PPM
   HC  MASS GRAMS
   CO  MASS GRAMS
   C02 MASS GRAMS
   NOX MASS GRAMS
   PARTICULATE  MASS GRAMS
   RUN TIME              SECONDS
         DFCy UET  (BRY)
         SCF* WET  (DRY)
         VOL  
-------
TEST NO,   478F01   RUN   1
VEHICLE MODEL   00 VU RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, CIO) L-A
TRANSMISSION M4

BAROMETER 741,17 MM HG(29,18 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  50, FCT
BAG RESULTS
   BAG NUMBER
   INSCRIPTION

   BLOWER OIF P MM, H20(IN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET P KM, 1120(IN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP, BEG, C(DEG, F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   TOT FLOW STB, CU, METRES(SCF)
   HC
   HC
   CO
   CO
   C02
         SAMPLE  METER/RANGE/PPM
         BCKGRD  METER/RANGE/PPM
         SAMPLE  METER/RANGE/PPM
         BCKGRD  METER/RANGE/PPM
         SAMPLE  METER/RANGE/PCT
     C02  BCKGRB  METER/RANGE/PCT
     NOX  SAMPLE  METER/RANGE/PPM
     NOX  BCKGRB  METER/RANGE/PPM
     DILUTION  FACTOR
     HC   CONCENTRATION  PPM
  9  CO   CONCENTRATION  PPM
  i>,  C02  CONCENTRATION  PCT
  •*  NOX  CONCENTRATION  PPM
     HC   MASS  GRAMS
     CO   MASS  GRAMS
     C02  MASS  GRAMS
     NOX  MASS  GRAMS
     PARTICIPATE MASS GRAMS

     HC   GRAMS/KM
     CO   GRAMS/KM
     C02  GRAMS/KM
     NOX  GRAMS/KM
     FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM

     RUN  TIME             SECONDS
     MEASURES BISTANCE    KM
     SCFf DRY
         DFC? WET (DRY)
         SCF» WET (BRY)
         VOL (SCM)
         SAM BLR (SCM)
         KM  (MEASURED)
         FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KH

COMPOSITE RESULTS
    TEST NUMBER        470F01
    BAROMETER    MM HG   741.2
    HUMIDITY     G/KB    10,5
    TEMPERATURE  DEC C    25.6
                                                 FTP    VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
                                                         PROJECT 05-5830-003

                                                      VEHICLE NO.l
                                                      DATE    7/17/01
                                                      BAG CART NO, 1 / CVS NO,  3
                                                      BYNO NO,  .•    2

                                                      BRY BULB TEMP, 25,6 BEG C(78,0 BEG F)
                                                      ABS, HUMIDITY 10,5 GM/KG
TEST WEIGHT  1021, KG( 2250, LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5,4 KU(  7.3 HP)
DIESEL    EM-478--F
ODOMETER  3964, KM( 2463, MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR
,99
1
:OLD TRANSIENT
701,0 (27.6)
571,5 (22,5)
36,7 ( 98,0)
13850,
134,8 ( 4759.)
27.6/13/ 110,
7,2/ I/ 7,
60.4/13/ 58,
2.7/13/ 2,
28, 6/ 3/ .47
2,9/ 3/ ,04
17, 4/ 2/ 17,
,5/ 2/ 1,
27,49
103,
54.
.43
16,9
0,04
8,49
1056,2
4,32
2,8S
1,42
1.50
186,3
,76
7.04
505,
5,67
.980
,973 (
1,000 (






2
STABILIZED
70J.6 (27,7)
576,6 (22.7)
32,8 ( 91.0)
23809.
233.1 ( 8229.)
7.4/13/ 30,
6,0/ I/ 6,
35.1/13/ 32,
2,1/13/ 2,
18, O/ 3/ ,29
3,2/ 3/ ,05
10, 7/ 2/ 11,
,5/ 2/ 1,
45,58
24,
30,
,24
10,2
3,22
8,12
1023.8
4,51
2.69
.52
1.32
166,6
.73
6,21
868,
6,14
,981
,957)
,981)
367,8
77,96
11,81
6.61

CARBON
3
HOT TRANSIENT
703,6 (27.7)
571,5 (22,5)
34,4 ( 94,0)
13846,
135,1 ( 4771.)
9.8/13/ 39,
6.0/ I/ 6.
52.4/13/ 50.
1.8/13/ 2,
25, 4/ 3/ .41
3,0/ 3/ ,05
16, 9/ 2/ 17.
,5/ 2/ 1.
31.66
33.
47,
,37
16,4
2,59
7,37
915,5
4,21
1,70
,45
1,29
160,4
.74
5,97
505,
5,71
,980
.976 (
1.000 (





DIOXIDE G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS  G/KM


CARBON
OXIDES
MONOXIDE G/KM
OF NITROGEN G/KH
PARTICULATES G/KM
4
STABILIZED
703.6 (27.7)
576,6 (22,7)
31,7 ( 89,0)
23825,
233,8 ( 8255.)
6.1/13/ 24,
5.6/ I/ 6.
33.7/13/ 31,
1.6/13/ 1.
16, 7/ 3/ ,27
2.5/ 3/ .04
10, 8/ 2/ 11,
,5/ 2/ 1,
49,34
19,
29,
,23
10,3
2,55
7,91
978.7
4.57
1,22
,42
1,29
159,5
,75
5.94
869,
6,13
.981
.960)
,981)
36,8,9
77,94
11.84
5,95
3-BAG (4-BAG)
169,0 ( 166,9)
6,32 ( 6,24)
,69 ( ,66)
1,35 ( 1,34)
.74 ( .74)
.414 ( .343)

-------
TEST NO,    478H02   RUN   1
VEHICLE MODEL   80 VU RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 741,17 MM HG(29,10 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDIFY  53,  PCT
BAfi RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE

   BLOWER DIF P MM, I-!20(IN. H20)
   BLOWER INLET P MM,  H20(IN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP.  DEG, C(DEG, F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
 o

 Ul
   TOT
   HC
   HC
   CO
   CO
   C02
   002
   NOX
   NOX
       FLOU STD, CU» METRES(SCF)
       CAMPLE METER/RANGE/FPM
       SCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
       SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
       RCKCRD METER/RANGE/PPM
       CAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
       BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
       CAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
       BCKGRU METER/RANCE/PPh
   DILUTION  FACTOR
HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC  MASG GRAMS
CO  MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
PARTICULATE MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME             SECONDS
     DFCy WET (DRY)
     SCF> WET (DRY)
     VOL (SCM)
     SAM BLR (SCM)
     KM  (MEASURED)

TEST NUMBER*
BAROMETERy           MM HG
HUMIDITYy            G/KG
TEMPERATUREy         DEG C
 CARBON DIOXIDEy      G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTIONy    L/100KM

HYDROCARBONS*        G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE*     G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN*  G/KM
HFET   VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 05-5030-003

     VEHICLE NOil
     DATE    7/17/81
     BAG CART NO,  1
     DYNO NO.  .=    2
     CVS NO,   3

     DRY BULB TEMP, 25,6 DEG C<78,0 DEG F)
                                                     HFET

                                                 703.6 (27.7)
                                                 571,5 (22,5)
                                                  37,2 (  99,0)
                                                    21020,
                                                 204,1 (  7206.)
                                                  9.5/13/  38.
                                                  4.0/ I/
                                                 63.3/13/
                                                  1.3/13/
                                                 37,67 3/
                                                  2,4/ 3/
                                                 30, 6/ 2/
                                                                                          TEST WEIGHT  1021.  KG( 2250,  LDS)
                                                                                          ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5,4 KW(  7,3 HP)
                                                                                          DIESEL    EM-478-F
                                                                                          ODOMETER  3903,  KM( 2475,  MILES)
                                                                                             NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR  1,02
               5,
              61,
               1,
              ,63
              ,04
              31,
               0,
        20,84
         33,
         58,
         ,60
        30,2
         3,92
        13,80
       2236,1
        11,98
         3,78
        766,
     ,952 ( ,936)
    1,000 ( ,977)
       204,1
       43,42
       16,32

      4781-102
       741,2
        11,2
        25,6
        137,0
        5,07

         ,24
         ,85
         ,73

-------
TEST NO,   478103   RUN   1
VEHICLE MODEL   80 VU RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, CID) L4
TRANSMISSION M4


BAROMETER 740,92 MM HG(29,17 IN MG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY
BAG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE
BLOWER DIF P MM, H20(IN, H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM, H20(IN, H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP, DEG. C(DEG, F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STl'U CU, METRES(SCF)
HC  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO  SAMfLC METER/RANGE/PPM
CO  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
IIC  MASS GRAMS
CO  MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
PARTICIPATE MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME             SECONDS
     DEC* WET (DRY)
     SCFr WET (DRY)
     VOL (SCtt)
     SAM BLR (SCM)
     KM  (MEASURES)
 n
   TEST  NUMBERr
   BAROMETER»            Mil  HG
   HUMIDITY*             G/KG
   TEMPERATUREf          DEG C
    CARBON  DIOXIDE*       G/KM
   FUEL  CONSUMPTION*     L/100KM

   HYDROCARBONSi         G/KM
   CARBON MONOXIDEr      G/KM
   OXIDES OF NITROGEN,   G/KM
IDLE   VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 05-5830-003

     VEHICLE NO.l
     DATE    7/17/81
     BAG CART NO,   1
     DYNO NO,   •'  2
     CVS NO,   3

     DRY BULB TEMP, 25,0 DEG C(77,0 BEG F)
     AB5, HUMIDITY 10,7 GM/KG

        IDLE

    703,6 (27,7)
    574,0 (22,6)
     27,8 (  82,0)
       32906,
    326,1 (11515.)
     6.6/13/  26,
     6,0/ I/   6,
    26.9/13/  25,
     1.1/13/   1,
     6,8/ 3/  ,11
     2,9/ 3/  ,04
     3,0/ 2/   4,
      ,2/ 2/   0.
       121,47
         21,
         23,
         ,06
         3,6
         3,86
         8,01
        365,8
         2,25
          ,51
       1200,
     ,992 (  ,975)
    1,000 (  ,982)
       326,1
       67,95
      47BI03
       740,9
        10,7
        25,0
         73,2
                                                                                          TEST WEIGHT  1021. KG( 2250,  LBS)
                                                                                          ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5.4 KU<  7.3 HP)
                                                                                          DIESEL    EM-478-F
                                                                                          ODOMETER  4006. KM( 24S9. MILES)
                                                                                          NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR  1,00

-------
TEST NO,    470504    RUN    1
VEHICLE MODEL    80  VU  RABBIT
ENGINE  1,5  L(  90, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
 BAROMETER  740,92  MM HG(29,17 IN HO
 RELATIVE HUMIDITY  49,  PCT
 BAG RESULTS
    TEST CYCLE

    BLOWER  DIP P MM, H20(IN, H20)
    BLOWER  INLET P MM,  H2Q(IN, H2Q)
    BLOWER  INLET TEMP,  DEC, C(DEG, F)
    BLOWER  REVOLUTIONS
n
(SI
TOT
HC
I-IC
CO
CO
C02
C02
NOX
NOX BCKGRD
DILUTION FACTOR
I-IC  CONCENTRATION
CO  CONCENTRATION
    CONCENTRATION
C02
NOX
I-IC
CO
C02
NOX
        FLOW STD, CU, METRES(SCF)
        SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
        BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
         AMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
               METER/RANGE/PPM
               METER/RANGE/PCT
               METER/RANGE/PCT
         SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
               METER/RANGE/PPM
              PPM
              PPM
              PCT
              PPM
S3CKGRD
SAMPLE
HCKGRD
        CONCENTRATION
         siSS GRAMS
         }SS GRAMS
         *SS GRAMS
         WS GRAMS
    PARTICULATE MASS GRAMS
    RUN TIME             SECONDS
         DFCy WET (DRY)
         SCFt WET (DRY)
         VOL (5CM)
         SAM BLR (SCM)
         KM  (MEASURED)

    TEST NUMBER>
    BAROMETER?           MM HG
    HUMIDITY?            G/KG
    TEMPERATURE,         DEG C
     CARBON DIOXIDE*      G/KM
    FUEL CONSUMPTION,    L/100KM

    MYflROCARBDNSj         G/KM
    CARBON MONOXIDE*     G/KM
    OXIDES OF NITROGEN?  G/KM
50 KPH VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 05-5830-003

     VEHICLE NO.l
     DATE    7/17/81
     BAG CART NO,  1
     DYNO NO,    •.  2
     CVS NO,   3

     DRY BULB TEMP. 25,0 DEG C(77,0 DEG F)
     ABS, HUMIDITY 10,0 CM/KG

        50 K

    703,6 (27,7)
    574,0 (22,6)
     33,9 ( 93,0)
       16462,
    160,6 ( 5671,)
    15.9/13/  63,
     6,0/ I/   6,
    28,9/13/  27,
     1.1/13/   1,
    23,O/ 3/  ,37
     2,6/ 3/  ,04
    12,8/ 2/  13,
       ,2/ 2/   0,
        35,09
         58,
         25,
         ,33
        12,6
         5.34
         4,67
        903,2
         3,78
         1,11
        600,
     ,972 (  ,956)
    1,000 (  ,981)
       160,6
       34,00
        8,36

       478504
       740,9
        10,0
        25,0
        117,6
        4,39

         ,64
         ,56
         ,45
                                                                                      TEST WEIGHT  1021, KC< 2250, LBS)
                                                                                      ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5,4 KW(  7,3 HP)
                                                                                      DIESEL    EM-478-F
                                                                                      ODOMETER  4006,  KM( 2489, MILES)
                                                                                      NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR   ,98

-------
TEST NO,   470805   RUN   1
VEHICLE MODEL   80 VW RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 740,66 MM MG<29,16 IN tIG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  50, PCT
BAG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE
   BLOWER DIP P MM, H20CIN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET P MM, H20CIN. 1-120)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP, BEG, C(DEG, F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   TOT FLOW STD, CU, METRES(SCF)
   Hi:  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   IIC  BCKCRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
   C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
   NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   NOX BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PPM
   DILUTION FACTOR
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
   HC  MASS GRAMS
o
i
CD
   CO  MASS GRAMS
   C02 MASS GRAMS
   NOX MASS GRAMS
   PARTICULATE MASS GRAMS
   RUN TIME
        DFC* UET (BRY)
        SCF. WET (DRY)
        VOL (SCM)
        SAM BLR (SCM)
        KM  (MEASURED)

   TEST NUMBER>
   BAROMETER»            MM MG
   HUMIDITY,            G/KG
   TEMPERATURE*         DEC C
    CARBON DIOXIDE/       G/KM
   FUEL CONSUMPTION*     L/100KM

   HYDROCARBONS,         G/KM
   CARBON MONOXIDE*      G/KM
   OXIDES OF NITROGEN*  G/KM
35 KPH VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 05-5830-003

     VEHICLE NO.l
     BATE    7/17/81
     BAG CART NO,  1
     DYNO NO,   -2
     CVS NO,   3

     DRY BULB TEMP, 25,6 BEG C(78,0 BEG F)
     ABS, HUMIDITY 10,5 GM/KG

        85 K

    703,6 (27,7)
    574,0 (22,6)
     37,8 (100,0)
       16457,
    159,4 < 5627.)
    11.4/13/  46,
     7,2/ I/   .7,
    68.1/13/  66,
     1.1/13/   1,
    43,7/ 3/  ,75
     3,1/ 3/  ,05
    39,4/ 2/  39.
      ,2/ 2/   0,
        17,68
         39,
         63,
         .70
        39,2
         3,57
        11,72
       2049,0
        11,85
         3,36
        600,
     ,943 (
    1,000 (
       159,4
       33,90
       14.20
                                                                                             TEST WEIGHT  1021, KG< 2250, LBS)
                                                                                             ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5,4 KU(  7,3 HP)
                                                                                             DIESEL    EM-478-F
                                                                                             ODOMETER  4015, KM( 2495, MILES)
                                                                                             NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR   ,99
                                                            ,928)
                                                            ,977)
                                                      478805
                                                       740,7
                                                        10,5
                                                        25,6
                                                        144,3
                                                        5,34
                                                         ,83
                                                         ,84

-------
 TEST  NO,    478F06    RUN    2
 VEHICLE  MODEL    80  VU RABBIT
 ENGINE  1,5  L(  90, CID) L-4
 TRANSMISSION M4

 BAROMETER 741,93 MM HG(29.21 IN HG)
 RELATIVE HUMIDITY   46, PCT
 BAG RESULTS
    BAG NUMBER
    DESCRIPTION

    BLOWER DIP  P MM, H20(IN,  H20)
    SLOWER INLET P MM. H20(IN, H20)
    BLOWER INLET TEMP, DEG, C(DEG,  F)
    BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
    TOT FLOW STIi, CU, METRES(SCF)
    HC  SAMPLE  METER/RANGE/PPM
    HC  BCKGRD  METER/RANGE/PPM
    CO  SAMPLE  METER/RANGE/PPM
    CO  BCKGRD  METER/RANGE/PPM
    C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
    C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
    NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
    NOX BCKfiRO METER/RANGE/PPM
    DILUTION FACTOR
    HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
    CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
    C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
    NQX CONCENTRATION PPM
    HC  MAGS GRAMS
    CO  MASS GRAMS
    C02 MASS GRAMS
    NOX MASS GRAMS
    PARTICIPATE  MASS  GRAMS

    HC  GRAMS/KM
    CO  GRAMS/KM
    C02 GRAMS/KM
    NOX GRAMS/KM
    FUEL CONSUMPTION  BY CB L/100KM
n

171
    RUN TIME
    MEASURED DISTANCE
    SCF> DRY
         DFC, UET (DRY)
         SCF; WET (DRY)
                         SECONDS
                         KM
         VOL (SCM)
         SAM BLR (SCM)
         KM  (MEASURED)
         FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM

COMPOSITE RESULTS
    TEST NUMBER        478F06
    BAROMETER    MM HG  741,9
    HUMIDITY     G/KG     9,3
                                                FTP    VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
                                                        PROJECT 05-5030-003

                                                     VEHICLE NO.l
                                                     DATE    7/20/81
                                                     BAG CART NO, 1 / CVS NO,  3
                                                     DYNO NO,      2

                                                     DRY BULB TEMP, 25,0 DEG C(77,0 DEG F)
                                                     ABS, HUMIDITY  9,3 GM/KG
TEST WEIGHT  1021, KG( 2250, LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5.4 KU(  7,3 HP)
DIESEL    EM-478-F
ODOMETER  4046, KM( 2514, MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR   ,95
    TEMPERATURE  BEG C
                          5,0
1
:OLD TRANSIENT
706,1 (27,8)
576.6 (22,7)
35,6 ( 96,0)
13834,
134,7 ( 4758.)
19.2/13/ 77,
6,8/ I/ 7,
59.5/13/ 57,
1.9/13/ 2,
30, 3/ 3/ ,50
3,0/ 3/ ,05
10. U 2/ 19.
,!/ 2/ 0,
26,06
70,
54,
,46
10,5
5,46
8,46
1127,0
4,55
4.12
,94
1,46
194,9
,79
7,30
504,
5,78
,981
,971
1.000






2
STABILIZED
708,7 (27,9)
579,1 (22,8)
32,8 ( 91,0)
23817,
233,1 ( 8232,)
6,0/13/ 24,
5,2/ I/ 5,
33.2/13/ 31,
1.8/13/ 2,
18, 8/ 3/ ,30
3,2/ 3/ ,05
11. 5/ 2/ 12.
,!/ 2/ 0,
43,69
19,
28,
,25
11,4
2.56
7,72
1031,8
4,85
1.63
,41
1.25
175,2
,79
6,51
868.
6,18
,982
( ,957)
( ,982)
367,9
77,90
11,96
6,89

CARBON
3
MOT TRANSIENT
706,1 (27,8)
579,1 (22.8)
35,6 ( 96.0)
13854,
134,9 ( 4763,)
8.1/13/ 33,
5,2/ I/ 5,
47.5/13/ 45,
1.6/13/ 1,
26, 7/ 3/ .44
3,2/ 3/ ,05
17, I/ 2/ 17.
,!/ 2/ 0,
30,12
27,
42,
,39
17,0
2,14
6,63
963,0
4,19
1,85
.37
1.15
166.7
,72
6,19
505,
5,78
,901
,974 (
1,000 (





DIOXIDE G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS (THC) G/KM


CARBON
OXIDES
MONOXIDE G/KM
OF NITROGEN G/KM
PARTICULATES G/KM
4
STABILIZED
706,1 (27,8)
579.1 (22.8)
32.8 ( 91,0)
23799,
233,0 ( 8227.)
6,0/13/ 24.
4,8/ I/ 5,
32.9/13/ 30,
1.6/13/ 1,
17, 9/ 3/ ,29
3,6/ 3/ ,06
11, I/ 2/ 11,
,!/ 2/ 0,
45,96
19,
20.
,23
11,0
2,58
7.69
990.4
4,68
1,35
.41
1.23
159,1
,75
5,92
868,
6,23
,983
,960)
,982)
367,9
77,88
12.00
6.05
3- BAG (4-BAG)
176.9 ( 172.2)
6,58 ( 6.41)
,51 ( ,51)
1,27 ( 1.26)
,77 ( ,76)
.373 ( ,359)

-------
TEST NO,   4781-107   RUN   2
VEHICLE MODEL   80 VU RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 LC 90, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 741,43 MM HG(29,19 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  44, PCT
DAG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE
   SLOWER DIP P MM* H2QCIN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET P MM, H20(IN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP, DEC, C(BEG, F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   TOT FLOW STD, CU, METRES(SCF)
       SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
       BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
       SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
       BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
       SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
   C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
   NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   DILUTION FACTOR
   MC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
   HC  MASS GRAMS
   CO  MASS GRAMS
   C02 MASS GRAMS
   NOX MASS GRAMS
   PARTICULATE MASS GRAMS
   RUN TIME
        DFCy  U'ET (DRY)
        SCFy  WET (DRY)
        VOL (SCM)
        SAM BLR (SCM)
        KM  (MEASURED)
n
CTi
o
    HC
    HC
    CO
    CO
    CO?
   TEST NUMBERy
   BAROMETER?            MM  HG
   HUMIDITYt             G/KG
   TEMPERATUREy          DEG C
    CARBON DIOXIDE,       G/KM
   FUEL CONSUMPTION/     L/100KM

   HYDROCARBONS»         G/KM
   CARBON MONOXIDEy      G/KM
   OXIDES OF NITROGEN*   G/KM
HFET   VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 05-5830-003

     VEHICLE N0,l
     DATE    7/20/81
     BAG CART NO,  1
     DYNO NO,   -'  2
     CVS NO.   3

     DRY BULB TEMP, 26,1 DEG C(79,0 DEG F)
     ABS, HUMIDITY  9,5 GM/KG

        HFET

    706,1 (27.8)
    579,1 (22,8)
     38,3 (101,0)
       21069,
    204,3 (  7215.)
    12.6/13/  50,
     7.6/ I/   8.
    72.8/13/  71.
     1.4/13/   1,
    39,8/ 3/  .67
     2.5/ 3/  .04
    34,5/ 2/  35,
      ,4/ 2/   0.
        19,53
         43,
         68,
         ,64
        34,1
         5.08
        16,20
       2306,0
        12,82
         4,02
        768,
     ,949 (  ,935)
    1,000 (  ,980)
       204,3
       43.45
       16,33

      478H07
       741.4
         9,5
        26.1
        146,1
        5,42

         ,31
         ,99
         .79
                                                                                              TEST  WEIGHT   1021.  KG(  2250,  LBS)
                                                                                              ACTUAL  ROAD  LOAD    5.4  KW(   7,3  HP)
                                                                                              DIESEL    EM-478-F
                                                                                              ODOMETER  4070, KM(  2529. MILES)
                                                                                              NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION  FACTOR
,96

-------
TEST NO,   475F01   RUN   1
VEHICLE MODEL   81 VW RABBIT
ENGINE 5,7 L(350, CUD V~8
TRANSMISSION A3
BAROMETER 742,70 MM h'G<29,24  IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  58* PCT
BAG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE
o
                 MM,  H2G(I.N,  1-120)
                 P MM, 1-120(IN, 1120)
                      OEG, C(DEG,  F)
BLOWER BIF P
BLOWER INLET
BLOWER INLET TEMP,
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
TOT FLOW STB, CU, METRES(SCF)
HC  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC  BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PPM
CO  SAMPLE ME1ER/RANGE/PPM
CO  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C02 BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NQX BCKGRB METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
    CONCENTRATION PPM
    MASS GRAMS
    MASS GRAMS
    MAGS GRAMS
    MASS GRAMS
PARTIOU! ATE MAGS GRAMS
RUN TIME             SECONDS
     DFC, WET (DRY)
     SCF, UET (DRY)
    NOX
    HC
    CO
    C02
    NOX
         VOL
         SAM
         KM
         (SCM)
         BLR  (SCM)
         (MEASURED)
TEST NUMBER.
BAROMETER,
HUMIDITY >
TEMPERATURE y
 CARBON DIOXIDE*
FUEL CONSUMPTION/
CARBON MONOXIDE/
OXIDES OF NITROGEN>
                         MM  HG
                         G/KG
                         DEC C
                          G/KM
                         L/100KM

                         G/KM
                         G/KM
                         G/KM
C505   VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 05-5830-003

     VEHICLE N0,l
     DATE    4/10/81
     BAG CART NO,  1
     DYNO NO,   i   2
     CVS NO,   3

     DRY BULB TEMP, 23,3 DEC C(74,0 DEG F)
     ABS, HUMIDITY 10,7 GM/KG

        C505

    703,6 (27,7)
    566,4 (22,3)
     35,0 ( 95,0)
       13344,
    135,3 ( 4776,)
    21,7/ 3/ 217.
     1,9/ 3/  19,
    53.8/12/ 115,
     2,4/12/   4,
    32,O/ 3/  ,55
     3,1/ 3/  ,03
    2.1,67 27  22,

       *U23*,~15
        199,
        100,
         ,50
        21,0
        15,51
        16,98
       1239,4
         5,43
        15,52
        504,
     ,957 ( ,939)
    1,000 ( ,976)
       135.3
       20,66
        5.57

      475F01
       742,7
        10,7
        0,44

        2,79
        3,05
         ,98
                                                                                          TEST WEIGHT  1021, KG( 2250, LBS)
                                                                                          ACTUAL. ROAD LOAD   5,4 KW(  7,3 HP)
                                                                                          DIESEL    EM-475-F
                                                                                          ODOMETER  3676, KM< 2284, MILES)
                                                                                          NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR  1,00

-------
TEST NO,   482F01   RUN   1
VEHICLE MODEL   80 VU RASBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L( 90. CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4

BAROMETER 739,65 MM 1-10(29,12 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  67, PCT
BAG F.'ESIJLTS
   BAf: NUMBER
   DESCRIPTION

   BLOWER DIF P MM,  1-120(IN, 1-120)
   BLOWER INLET P MM, 1-120(IN, H20)
   ULOUER INLET TEMP, DEG,  CfDEfi. F)
          REVOLUTIONS
       FLOW STB, CU,  METRES(SCF)
       SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
       SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
       BCKTMi METER/RANGE/PCT
       SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
       BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
o

en
K)
    TO)
    HC
    HC
    CO
    CO
    C02
    C02
    NOX
       BCKGRD
       SAMPLE
    NOX
    DILUTION FACTOR
    HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
    CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
    C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
    NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
    HC  MAGS GRAMS
    CO  MASS GRAMS
    C02 MASS GRAMS
    NOX MASS GRAMS
    PARTICULATE MASS GRAMS

    HC  GRAMS/KM
    CO  GRAMS/KM
    C02 GRAMS/KM
    NOX GRAMS/KM
    FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM

    RUN TIME             SECONDS
    MEASURED DISTANCE    KM
    SCF> BRY
         DFC» WET (DRY)
         SCF, WET (DRY)
         VOL (SCM)
         SAM BLR (SCM)
         KM  (MEASURED)
         FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM

COMPOSITE RESULTS
    TEST NUMBER        402F01
    BAROMETER    MM HG  739,6
    HUMIDITY     G/KG    13.7
    TEMPERATURE  DEO C   25,0
                                                 FTP     VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
                                                        PROJECT  05-5830-003

                                                     VEHICLE NO.l
                                                     DATE    5/  3/81
                                                     BAG CART NO,  1 / CVS NO,   3
                                                     DYNO  NO,      2

                                                     DRY BULB TEMP, 25,0 DE.G C(77.0 BEG F)
                                                     ABS,  HUMIDITY 13,7 GM/KG
                                                                                              TECT  WEIGHT   1021,  KG(  2250,  LBS)
                                                                                              ACTUAL  ROAD  LOAD    5.4  KM(   7.3  HP)
                                                                                              DIESEL     EM--432-F
                                                                                              ODOMETER   4159. KM(  2584. MILES)
                                                                                               NOX  HUMIDITY  CORRECTION  FACTOR   1,11
1
:OLD TRANSIENT
698,5 (27,5)
571,5 (22,5)
32,0 ( 91,0)
13074,
135,6 ( 4787.)
20.0/12/ 40,
8,4/ I/ 0,
08.6/13/ 89,
37.5/13/ 35,
28, 7/ 3/ ,47
3,7/ 3/ ,06
15, V/ 2/ 16.
,5/ 2/ 1.
27.62
32.
53,
.42
15,4
2,49
3,43
1037,3
-1,44
2,48
,43
1,47
100,5
,77
6 , 79
505,
5,75
,974
,973
1,000






9
STABILIZED
703.6 (27,7)
574.0 (22,6)
32.2 ( 90,0)
23824.
233,1 ( C230,)
9.3/12/ 19,
6,6/ I/ 7*
52.0/13/ 49,
30.8/13/ 28,
18, O/ 3/ ,29
3.3/ 3/ ,05
10, O/ 2/ 10,
,57 2/ 1,
45,50
12,
21,
,24
9,5
1,64
5,63
1017,3
4,71
1,13
.27
.91
164,4
,76
6,14
868,
6,19
,976
( .952)
( ,975)
368,6
77,50
11,94
6,45

CARBON
3
HOT TRANSIENT
703,6 (27,7)
571,5 (22.5)
35,0 ( 95,0)
13855,
134,8 ( 4760.)
15.2/12/ 30,
6,6/ I/ 7,
65.2/13/ 63,
20.4/13/ 19,
25. 5/ 3/ .42
3.4/ 3/ ,05
15. O/ 2/ 15,
,5/ 2/ 1,
31,50
24,
44,
,37
14,5
1,86
6,03
902.9
4,16
1,70
,32
1.19
157,2
,72
5,90
505,
5,74
.974
,975 (
1.000 (





DIOXIDE G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
HYDROCARBONS (THC) G/KM


CARBON
OXIDES
MONOXIDE G/KM
OF NITROGEN G/KM
PARTICIPATES G/KM
4
STABILIZED
706.1 (27,8)
576,6 (22.7)
32.8 ( 91.0)
23839,
232,9 ( 8222.)
8.7/12/ 17,
5,8/ I/ 6,
39,8/13/ 37,
16.7/13/ 15,
17, 3/ 3/ ,28
3,4/ 3/ ,05
9,8/ 2/ 10,
,5/ 2/ 1,
47,61
12.
22,
,23
9,3
1,50
5,03
959,7
4,61
1,08
,26
.94
155,4
,75
5,81
869,
6,17
,976
,954)
.975)
367,7
77,45
11,92
5,85
3-BAG (4-BAG)
165,7 ( 163.1)
6,21 ( 6.11)
,32 ( ,31)
1.10 ( 1.11)
.75 ( .75)
.266 < ,263)

-------
TEST NO.   4G2H02   RUN   .1
VEHICLE MODEL   30 VW RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L< 90, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 739,65 MM
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  t
BAG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE
KG(29,12 IN HG)
.3, PCT
BLOUER DIE P MM. H20CIN. H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM, H20(IN, H20)
BLOUER INLET TEMP, BEG, C(BEG,
BI..OWER REVOLUTIONS
T01
HC
MC
CO
OH
Cd2
CO?
K'OX
NOX
OIL
HC
? C!J
CT> CO?
w NOX
HC
CO
CO 2
NOX
FLOW STK. CU, METRES(SCF)
SAMPL E METER/RANGE/PPM
DCfvGRD MET ER/RANGE/FPM
SAHPLr- METER/RANGE/PPM
):C!\ORIJ ttFTER/RANGE/PPM
SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
HCKG!(D METER/RANGE/PCT
SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
BCKGRfi METER/RANGE/PPM
UriON FACTOR
CONCENTRATION PPM
CONCENTRATION PPM
CONCENTRATION PCT
CONCENTRATION PPM
MAGS fiRAMQ
MASS GRAMS
MAGS GRAMS
MASS GRAMS
                                   F)
    PARTICIPATE MASS GRAMS
    RUN TIME             SECONDS
         DFCf  UET (DRY)
         SCF>  UET (DRY)
         VOL (SCM)
         SAM
         KM
            DL.R  (SCM)
            (MEASURED)
    TEST NUMBER,
    BAROMETER?
    HUMIDITY?
    TEMPERATUREy
     CARBON  DIOXIDE?
    FUEL CONSUMPTION!

    HYDROCARBONS*
    CARBON MONOXIDE*
    OXIDES OF NITROGEN?
                        MM HG
                        G/KG
                        DEG C
                         G/KM
                        L/100KM

                        G/KM
                        G/KM
                        G/KM
HFET   VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 05-5030-003

     VEHICLE NO.l
     DATE    8/ 3/81
     BAG CART NO.  1
     DYNO NO,      2
     CVS NO.   3

     DRY BULB TEMP, 24,4 DEG C(76.0 BEG F)
     ADS, HUMIDITY 12.-4 GM/KG

        MEET

    698,5 (27,5)
    571,5 (22,5)
     35.0 ( 75.0)
       21050,
    204.0 ( 7233.)
    20,5/12/  41,
     5,4/ I/   5.
    78.2/13/  77.
    11.4/13/  10.
    30,O/ 3/  .64
     2.8/ 3/'  .04
    27,O/ 2/  2G,
       ,4/ 2/   0,
        20.54
         36.
         65.
         .60
        27,4
         4.24
        15,51
       2250,1
        11,39
         4.12
        767,
     ,951 (  ,932)
    1,000 (  ,974)
       204,8
       43,04
       16,30

       482H02
       739,6
        12,4
        24,4
        138.0
        5,17

         ,26
         .95
         ,70
                                                                                             TEST WEIGHT  1021, KG< 2250. LBS)
                                                                                             ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5.4 KW(  7,3 HP)
                                                                                             DIESEL    EM-4G2-F
                                                                                             ODOMETER
                                                                                              NOX  HUMIDITY  CORRECTION FACTOR  1,06

-------
  TEST NO,   482103   RUN   1
  VEHICLE MODEL   80 VW RABBIT
  ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, CID) L-4
  TRANSMISSION M4
  BAROMETER 739,90 MM HG(29,13 IN HG)
  RELATIVE HUMIDITY  60, PCT
  BAG RESULTS
     TEST CYCLE

     BLOWER DIE P MM, H20
-------
TEST NO,   402504   RUN    1
VEHICLE MODEL   80 VU RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L.( 90, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 739,90 MM 1-16(29,13 IN HO)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  66, PCT
BAG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE

   BLOUER DIF P MM, H20(IN, H20)
   iiLOWER INLET P MM. H20CEN, H20)
   BLOUER INLET TEMP, DUG, C(DEG,  F)
   DI..OWER REVOLUTIONS
   TO'f FLOW STD, CLI,  METRES (SCF)
   Hi;  sifrHPLH HETFR/RANGF/PPM
   MC  ICKGRIi MF.TFR/RAN6E/PPM
   ::.T:  -;AHPLE MEKR/RANGE/PPM
   CO  GCXGRD HETER/RANGE/PPM
   t;n;-i CAMPLE MLTER/RANGE/PCT
   Ci)2 BCKCRB METER/RANGE/PCT
   NiiX b'AMI:'LE rtETER/RANGE/PPM
   NOX FCKGRB HETER/RANCE/PPM
   IJILUTION FACTOR
   I-IC  CONCENTRATION
9  CO  CONCENTRATION
cr.  C02 CONCENTRATION
^  NOX CONCENTRATION
   HC  MASS GRAMS
   CO  MASS CRAMS
   C02 MASS GRAMS
   NOX MASS GRAMS
                                             50 MPH VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
                                                     PROJECT 05-5830-003

                                                  VEHICLE NO.l
                                                  DATE    O/ 3/01
                                                  BAG CART NO,   1
                                                  DYNO NO,      2
                                                  CVS NO,   3

                                                  DRY BULB TEMP, 23,9 DEG C(75,0  DEG  F)
                                                  AUG. HUMIDITY  12,7 CM/KG

                                                     50 M

                                                 706,1 (27,8)
                                                 579,1 (22,8)
                                                  31.7 ( 89,0)
                                         TEST WEIGHT  1021, KG(  2250,  IBS)
                                         ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5.4  KU(  7,3  HP)
                                         DIESEL    EM-482-F
                                         ODOMETER  4200. KM( 2610. MILES)
                                                                                              NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR  1,07
                      PPM
                      PPM
                      PCT
                      PPM
PARTICULATE
RUN TIME
                MACS GRAMS
         HFC:
         SCF
         VOL
         SAM
         KM
          UET  (DRY)
          WET  (DRY)
          (SCM)
          .DLR (SCM)
          (MEASURED)
                         SECONDS
TEST NUMBER*
BAROMETER t
HUMIDITY*
TEMPER A TURE>
 CARDON DIOXIDE ,
FUEL CONSUMPTION*

HYDROCARBONS*
CARB'ON ilONOXIDC>
OX.TDES OF NITROGEN*
                         MM HG
                         G/KG
                         DEG C
                          G/KM
                         L/100KM

                         G/KM
                         G/KM
                         G/KM
161
10,
4,
O7
v-tj +
5,
20,
1
iL. k
11,
1








,5 ( 5702.)
0/12/
6/ I/
7/13/
4/13/
5/ 3/
7/ 3/
2/ 2/
4/ 2/
40,09
16,
16,
,29
10,8
1,45
3,08
057,1
20,
5,
22,
5,
,33
,04
11,
0,








     3,57
     1,40
    600,
 ,975 (  ,954)
1,000 (  ,976)
   161,5
   33,05
    8,32

  482504
   739,9
    12,7
    23,9
    103,0
    3,04

     .17
     ,37
     ,43

-------
                                                        PROJECT 05-5830-003
TEST NO,   482805   RUN1   1
VEHICLE MODEL   BO VU RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, CID) L--4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 73V,90 Mil HG(29.13 IN KG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  71, PCT
BAG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE

   BLOWER DIP P MM, H2CKIN, 1-120)
   BLOWER INLET P MM, I-!20(1N, H2Q)
   BLOWER ]NLET TI-MP* DEC, C 8CKGRD
MX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
DILUTION FACTOR
HC  CONCENTRATION  PPM
CO  CONCENTRATION  PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION  PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION  PPM
HC,  MASS GRAMS
CO  MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
PARTICIPATE MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME
     DFC* WET (DRY)
     SCF> WET (PRY)
     VOL. (SCM)
     SAM BLR (SCM)
     KM  (MEASURED)

TEST NUMBERt
BAROMETER*           MM H6
HUMIDITY*            G/KG
TEMPERATURE,         DEO C
 CARBON DIOXIDE*      G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION*    L/100KM

HYDROCARBONS*         G/KM
CARBON MONOXIDE*     G/KM
GX.U.e» OF NITROGEN*  G/KM
 VEHICLE N0,l
 DATE    8/ 3/81
 BAG CART NO,  1
 DYNO NO,      2
 CVS NO,   3"

 BRY BULB TEMP. 24,4 DEG C<76.0 BEG F)
 ABS, HUMIDITY 14,0 CM/KG

    85 K

690,5 (27,5)
571,5 (22,5)
 38,3 (101,0)
   16471,
159,5 ( 5632.)
25.8/12/  52.
 4,6/ I/   5,
91,1/13/  92,
 4*4/13/   4,
42.5/ 3/  ,72
 4,I/ 3/  ,06
34.6/ 2/  35,
  ,3/ 2/   0,
    18,15
     47,
     85,
     ,66
    34,3
     4,35
    15,74
   1941,7
    11,73
     3,92
    600,
 ,945 ( ,923)
1,000 ( .971)
   159,5
   33,68
    1,22

    2805
    39,9
    14,0
    24,4
    136,5
    5,13

     ,31
    1.11
     ,82
                                                                                           TEST WEIGHT  1021, KG( 2250,  LBS)
                                                                                           ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5.4 KU<  7,3 HP)
                                                                                           DIESEL    EM--482-F
                                                                                           ODOMETER  4208, KM< 2615. MILES)
                                                                                           NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR  1,12

-------
TEST NO,   432F06    RUN   2
VEHICLE  MODEL    30  VW RABBIT
ENGINE  1,5 L(  90. CID)  L-4
TRANSMISSION «4

BAROMETER 741,93 MM HG<29,21 IN
RELATIVE HUMIDITY   63,  PCT
BAG RESULTS
    PAG NUMBER
    DESCRIPTION
                                 KG)
o
    BLOWER
    BLOWER
    BLOWER
    BLOWER
    CO
    HC
    HC
    CO
    CO
    C02
    C02
    NOX
    NOX
           DIP P
           INLET
           INLET TEMP,
           REVOLUTIONS
             MM,  i-!20(IN,  H20)
             P MM,  H20(IN,  1-120)
                   KG,  C(DEG.  F)
        FLOW S7D,  CU, METRES(SCF)
        SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
        ECKBRI'i METER/RANGE/PPM
               METER/RANGE/PPM
               METER/RANGff/PPM
               METER/RANGE/PCT
               METER/RANGE/PCT
               METER/RANGE/PPM
               METER/RANGE/PPM
    SAMPLE
    HCKGRD
    SAMPLE
    ilCKGRD
    CAMPLE
    BCKGRD
DILUTION FACTOR
HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
  " CONCENTRATION PCT
    CONCENTRATION PPM
    MASS GRAMS
    MASS GRAMS
    MASS GRAMS
    MASS GRAMS
    C02
    NOX
    HC
    CO
    C02
    NOX
    PARTICIPATE MASS GRAMS

    I-IC  GRAMS/KM
    CO  GRAMS/KM
    C02 GRAMS/KM
    NOX GRAMS/KM
    FUEL CONSUMPTION
                     BY CB L/100KM
                         SECONDS
                         KM
    RUN TIME
    MEASURED DISTANCE
    SCFy DRY
         DFC» WET (DRY)
         SCFf WET (DRY)
         VOL (SCM)
         SAM BLR (SCM)
         KM  (MEASURED)
         FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM

COMPOSITE RESULTS
    TEST NUMBER        4S2F06
    BAROMETER    MM HG  741,9
    HUMIDITY     G/KG    12,4
    TEMPERATURE  DEC C   24,4
                                             FTP     VEHICLE  EMISSIONS RESULTS
                                                     PROJECT 05--5830-003

                                                  VEHICLE  NO.l
                                                  BATE     B/ 4/81
                                                  BAG CART NO,  1 /  CVS NO,   3
                                                  DYNO  NO,      2

                                                  DRY BULB TEMP, 24,4 BEG  C(76,0 DEC F)
                                                  ABS,  HUMIDITY 12,4 GM/KG

                                                       1                    2
                                                COLD TRANSIENT
                                                                                              TEST WEIGHT  1021, KG( 2250, LBS)
                                                                                              ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5,4 NU<  7,3 HP)
                                                                                              DIESEL    EM-482-F
                                                                                              ODOMETER  4225. KM< 2625. MILES)
                                                                                              NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR  1,06
                                                                                             HOT TRANSIENT
STABILIZED
698,5 (27,5)
571,5 (22,5)
35,6 ( 96,0)
13664,
134,5 ( 4750.)
21.8/12/ 44,
5.2/ I/ 5,
61.1/13/ 59,
,5/13/ 0,
29, O/ 3/ ,48
3,5/ 3/ ,05
16, 2/ 2/ 16,
,77 2/ 1,
27,46
39,
56,
,43
15,5
2,99
8,84
1049,7
4,23
2,35
,52
1,53
182,1
,73
6,86
505,
5,76
,975
,973
1,000




706,1 (27,8)
579,1 (22,8)
32,8 ( 91,0)
23832,
232,3 ( 8203.)
8.2/12/ 16.
5,4/ I/ 5,
26.0/13/ 24,
1.1/13/ 1,
17, S/ 3/ ,28
3,5/ 3/ ,05
9,9/ 2/ 10,
,5/ 2/ 1.
47.20
11,
22,
,23
9,4
1,48
6,01
965,3
4.43
1,23
,24
,97
155,3
,71
5,81
868,
6,22
,977
( ,953)
( ,976)
366,8
75,36
11.98
6,31
701,0 (27.6)
574,0 (22,6)
35,0 ( 95,0)
13861.
134,6 ( 4753.)
16.3/12/ 33.
5,4/ I/ 5,
53.2/13/ 50,
,7/13/ 1,
25, O/ 3/ .41
3,5/ 3/ ,05
15, I/ 2/ 15.
,3/ 2/ 0.
32,23
27,
48,
,36
14,8
2,13
7,59
876.3
4,04
1,90
,37
1,32
152,0
,70
5,72
505,
5,77
,976
.975 (
1.000 (




706,1 (27,8)
579,1 (22,8)
32,8 ( 91,0)
23G18,
232,2 ( 8199.)
8.0/12/ 16,
5,0/ I/ 5,
25.4/13/ 23,
,6/13/ 1,
17, 2/ 3/ ,27
3,5/ 3/ ,05
9,7/ 2/ 10,
,3/ 2/ 0,
48,15
11,
22,
,22
9,4
1.48
5,98
943,4
4.42
1,27
,24
,96
151,7
,71
5,67
868,
6,22
.977
.956)
.977)
366.8
75,35
11,98
5,70
                                                                                  CARBON DIOXIDE      G/KM
                                                                                  FUEL CONSUMPTION    L/100KM
                                                                                  HYDROCARBONS (THC)  G/KM
                                                                                  CARBON MONOXIDE     G/KM
                                                                                  OXIDES OF NITROGEN  G/KM
                                                                                  PARTICIPATES        G/KM
3-BAG
159.9
6,00
.33
1,18
.71
,295
(4-BAG)
( 158,9)
( 5,96)
( ,33)
( 1,18)
( ,71)
( ,297)

-------
n
oo
  TEST HO,   482H07   RUN   2
  VEHICLE MODEL   00 W RABBIT
  ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, CTD) L-?
  TRANSMISSION Ml
BAROMKTER 742,44 MM HG<29,23 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  63, PCT
BAG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE

   BLOUER DIF P MM, H20(IN» H20)
   BLOWER INLET P MM,  I-!20(IN,  H20)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP.  BEG. C(DEG, F)
   BLOUER REVOLUTIONS
   TOT FLOW STD, CU, METRES(SCF)
   HC  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   HC  BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   CO  BCNGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   C02 SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
   C02 BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
   NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
   NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
   DILUTION FACTOR
   HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
   CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
   C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
   NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
   HC  MASS GRAMS
   CO  MASS GRAMS
   C02 MASS GRAMS
   NOX MASS GRAMS
   PARTICULATE MASS GRAMS
   RUN TIME   .          SECONDS
        BFC» WET (DRY)
        SCF> WET (DRY)
        VOL (SCM)
        SAM BLR (SCM)
        KM  (MEASURED)
     TEST NUMBER>
     BAROMETER?           MM MG
     HUMIDITY*             G/KG
     TEMPERATURE,          BEG C
      CARBON DIOXIDE,       G/KM
     FUEL CONSUMPTION.     L/100KH

     HYDROCARBONS*         G/KM
     CARBON MONOXIDEy      0/KM
     OXIIO OF  NITROGENt   G/KM
HFET   VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
        PROJECT 05-5030-003.

     VEHICLE NO.l
     DATE    8/ 4/81
     BAG CART NO,  1
     DYNO NO,      2
     CVS NO,   3

     DRY BULB TEMP, 24,4 BEG C<76.0 BEG F)
     ADS,  HUMIDITY 12,4 GM/KG

        HFET

    703,6 (27,7)
    576,6 (22,7)
     36,1 (  97,0)
       21011,
    202,3 (  7143.)
    28.5/12/  57,
     5.0/ I/   5,
    84.6/13/  84,
      •A/13/   1,
    38,5/ 3/  ,65
     3,5/ 3/  ,05
    28*9/ 2/  29,
      ,2/ 2/   0,
        20,19
         52,
         81,
         ,60
        28,7
         6,09
        19,09
       2218,3
        11,75
         4,61
        765,
     ,950 <  ,931)
    1,000 (  ,974)
       202,3
       40,56
       16,34

      482H07
       742,4
        12,4
        24,4
        135,8
        5,11

         ,37
        1.17
         .72
                                                                                             TEST WEIGHT   1021,  KG<  2250,  LBS)
                                                                                             ACTUAL  ROAD  LOAD    5,4  KW(  7,3  HP)
                                                                                             DIESEL     EM-402-F
                                                                                             ODOMETER   4249, KM(  2640, MILES)
                                                                                               NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR  1,06

-------
TEST NO.   432HOO   RUN   3
VEHICLE MODEL   80 VU RABBIT
ENGINE 1,5 L( 90, CID) L-4
TRANSMISSION M4
BAROMETER 744,22 MM HG(29,30 IN HG)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY  63, PCT
BAG RESULTS
   TEST CYCLE

   BLOWER DIF P MM, H20(IN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET P MM, 1120(IN, H20)
   BLOWER INLET TEMP, BEG, C(BEG, F)
   BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
   TOT FLOU STB, CU, METRES(SCF)
       SAMPLE METER/RANGF/PPM
              METER/RANGF/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGL/PPtl
              METER/RANGE/PCT
              METER/RANGE/PCT
              METER/RANGE/PPM
              METER/RANGE/PPM
 i
CT>
    HC
    HC
    CO
    CO
    C02
    C02
    NOX
    NOX
    BCKGRD
    SAMPLE
    BCKGRB
    SAMPLE
    BCKGRB
    SAMPLE
    BCKGRD
DILUTION FACTOR
HC  CONCENTRATION
CO  CONCENTRATION
    CONCENTRATION
    CONCENTRATION
    MASS GRAMS
PPM
PPM
PCT
l-'Ph
        MASS
        MASS
        MAQQ
         GRAMS
         GRAMS
         GRAMS
C02
NOX
HC
CO
C02
NOX
PARTICULATE MASS GRAMS
RUN TIME             SECONDS
     DFCy WET  (DRY)
     SCFr WET  (DPY)
     VOL (SCM)
     SAM BLR (SCM)
     KM  (MEASURED)

TEST NUMBER,
BAROMETER*           MM HG
HUMIDITY*            G/KG
TEMPERATUREy         DEG C
 CARBON DIOXIBEy      G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION*    L/100KM

HYDROCARBONSy        G/KM
CARBON MONOnPEj     G/KM
OXIDES OF NITROGEN  G/KM
                          HFET   VEHICLE EMISSIONS  RESULTS-
                                  PROJECT 05-5830-003

                               VEHICLE NO.l
                               DATE    8/ 5/81
                               BAG CART NO,   1
                               DYNO  NO,       2
                               CVS NO,   3.

                               DRY BULB TEMP, 24,4  BEG  C(76.0  BEG  F)
                               ABS,  HUMIDITY  12,4 CM/KG

                                  . HFET

                              690,5  (27,5)
                              571,5  (22,5)
                               37,8  (100,0)
                                 21022,
                              202,3  ( 7142.)
                              28.5/12/  57,
                               4,4/  I/   4,
                              89.1/13/  89,
                                 ,2/13/   0,
                              38,O/  3/   ,64
                               3,47  37   ,05
                              28,77  27  29,
                                 ,4/  27   0,
                                  20,46
                                                          .,59
                                                         2(3,3
                                                          6,16
                                                         20,34
                                                        2189,0
                                                         11,58
                                                          4,75
                                                         7A6,
                                                      .951  (  ,932)
                                                      ,000  (.  ,974)
                                                        202,3
                                                        40.30
                                                        1/..26

                                                       402HOO
                                                        744,2
                                                         12,4
                                                         24,4
                                                         13 4., A
                                                         5,00

                                                          ,38
                                                         1,25
                                                          ,71
                                                                                             TEST WEIGHT  1021. KG( 2250,  LBS)
                                                                                             ACTUAL ROAD LOAD   5,4 KU<   7,3  HP)
                                                                                             DIESEL    EM-482--F
                                                                                             ODOMETER  4*400, KM(  2058, MILES)
                                                                                              NOX  HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR  1,06

-------
 TEST NO,   485F01    RUN    1
 VEHICLE MODEL    SO  VU  RABBIT
 ENGINE 1,5 L(  90, CID) L-4
 TRANSMISSION M4

 BAROMETER 742,70 MM  !-!G(29,24  IN I-IG)
 RELATIVE HUMIDITY   55, PCT
 SAG RESULTS
    BAG NUMBER
    DESCRIPTION

    BLOWER DIP  P MM,  M20CIN,  1-120)
    BLOWER INLET P MM,  H20(IN,  N20)
    BLOWER INLET TEMP,  KG, C(DEG, D
    BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
    TOT FLOW STD, CU, METRES(SCF)
    HC
    MC
    CO
    CO
    C02
    SAMPLE ,METER/RANGE/PPM
    OCKGRB METER/RAK'GE/PPM
    SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
    BCKGRD ME TER/RANGE/PPM
    SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CQ2 ECKGRP METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGR.ri METER/RANGE/PPM
n i i.u now FACTOR
HC  CONCENTRATION PPM
CO  CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
    MASS GRAMS
    MASS GRAMS
    MASS GRAMS
    HC
    CO
    C02
    NOX MASS GRAMS
    P ARTICULATE MASS GRAMS

    HC  GRAMS/KM
    CO  CRAMS/KM
    C02 GRAMS/KM
    NOX GRAMS/KM
    FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM

    RUN TIME             SECONDS
    MEASURED DISTANCE    KM
    SCFr DRY
         DFC» WET (DRY)
         SCFc WET (DRY)
         VOL. (SCM)
         SAM BLR (SCM)
         KM  (MEASURED)
         FUEL CONSUMPTION L/100KM
COMPOSITE RESULTS
    TEST NUMBER
    BAROMETER    MM HO
    HUMIDITY     G/KG
    TEMPERATURE  BEG C
                   485F01
                    742,7
                     12,7
                     27,2
                                             FTP    VEHICLE EMISSIONS RESULTS
                                                     PROJECT 05-5830-003

                                                  VEHICLE NO.l
                                                  DATE    8/14/81
                                                  BAG CART NO, 1 / CVS NO,  3
                                                  DYN'O NO,      2

                                                  DRY BULB TEMP, 27,2 DEC C(81.0 DEC F)
                                                  AEG. HUMIDITY 12.7 GM/KG
TEST WEIGHT  1021.
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD
DIESEL    EM-485--F
OBOMETER  4394. KM(
K0(
5,4
2250, LBS)
KU(  7,3 HP)
 2730, MILES)
NOX HUMIDITY CORRECTION FACTOR  1.07
1
:OLD TRANSIENT
698,5 (27,5)
571,5 (22,5)
35,0 ( 95,0)
13857,
135,2 ( 4773.)
21,7/12/ 43,
13, O/ I/ 13,
62.0/13/ 60,
S.9/13/ 8.
29, If 3/ ,49
2,9/ 3/ ,04
16, 4/ 2/ 16,
,4/ 2/ 0,
26,78
31,
50,
,45
16,0
2,40
7.93
1107,6
4,43
2,42
.41
1,37
190,9
,76
7,30
505,
5,00
,978
,972
1,000






9
STABILIZED
701,0 (27,6)
574,0 (22,6)
33,3 ( 92.0)
23844,
233.3 ( 8237,)
11.3/12/ 23,
9,2/ I/ 9,
34.6/13/ 32.
S.l/13/ 7.
18, 2/ 3/ ,29
3,0/ 3/ ,05
10, 6/ 2/ 11,
,3/ 2/ 0,
45,18
14,
24,
,25
10,3
1,82
6,57
1052,0
4,92
1,54
,29
1,05
167,3
,78
6,47
869,
6,27
,980
( ,955)
( ,979)
368.4
73,14
12,07
6,91

CARBON
3
HOT TRANSIENT
698,5 (27,5)
571,5 (22,5)
36,1 ( 97,0)
13039,
134,8 ( 4759.)
19. A/12/ 39,
10, 8/ I/ 11.
54.8/13/ 52,
6.3/13/ 6,
25. Q/ 3/ ,42
3,0/ 3/ .05
15, 3/ 2/ 15,
,3/ 2/ 0,
31,12
29.
45.
,38
15,0
2,24
7.11
930.5
4.14
1,30
,39
1,23
160,4
,71
6,21
504.
5.80
.978
,975 (
1.000 (





DIOXIDE G/KM
FUEL CONSUMPTION L/iOOKM
HYDROCARBONS (THC) G/KM


CARBON
OXIDES
MONOXIDE G/KH
OF NITROGEN G/KM
PARTICULATES G/KM
4
STABILIZED
698,5 (27,5)
571.5 (22.5)
33,3 ( 92.0)
23000,
233.0 ( 8227.)
11.0/12/ 22,
10. 8/ I/ 11,
30.1/13/ 28,
5.7/13/ 5,
17, 6/ 3/ .28
3, 1/ 3/ ,05
10, 2/ 2/ 10,
•3/ 2/ 0,
46,85
11.
22.
,23
9,9
1,54
5,99
1001,2
4.72
1.47
,25
,96
159.8
,75
6,15
868,
6,27
,980
,957)
,979)
367.8
78,08
12,07
6,18
3-BAG (4-BAG)
170,6 ( 168,2)
6,59 ( 6.49)
.34 ( .33)
1,16 ( 1,14)
,76 ( ,75)
.299 ( ,295)

-------
         APPENDIX D





PARTICULATE EMISSION RESULTS

-------
                                                                                         Ri"ETrtrcrrn o crreffTE i  GRAPHIC coNincn.s crm
O

NJ
               4-1
               •H
               U
               a

               8?
               g
                                                                                                                   o
                                                                                                                   tn
                                                                                                                   QJ
                                                                                                                  T!
                                                                                                                   OJ
                                                                                                                   (U
                                                                                                                   ft
                                                                                                                  10
                   Figure D-l.   Smoke opacity and  vehicle  speed vs time for the first  505 seconds
                          of a  cold-start FTP, VW Rabbit Diesel, EM-329-F base  fuel, 12/16/80

-------
o
w
               •H
               U
               o

               CO
                         "t—Start;
                         0  Sec
End-
505 sec
                   Figure  D-2.   Smoke opacity and vehicle speed vs time for the first 505 seconds
                       of  a cold-start FTP,  VW Rabbit Diesel, EM-453-F shale oil fuel, 1/19/81

-------
o\°
u
IT!
I
    10
            Start
         0 Sec
                                                                                   505 Sec
                                                                                                        o
                                                                                                        OJ
                                                                                                        ft

                                                                                                        w
                                                                                                        (U
                                                                                                        iH
                                                                                                        •H
                                                                                                        E
                                                                                                        Q)
                                                                                                        QJ
          Fiaure D-3.  Smoke opacity and vehicle  speed vs. time for the  first 505 seconds
               of  a cold-start FTP, VW Rabbit  Diesel, EM-473-F, Paraho  JP-5, 5/8/81.

-------
o
I
en
        -P
        •H
        O
        o
        E
                                                                                                            10
                                                                                                 4-	.—I -   20
                                                                                                            30
                                                                                                     	; ..  40
                                                                                                            50
                                                                                                            60
                     0 Sec. ->•
                                                                                                505 Sec.
                                                                                                                o
                                                                                                                £}
                                                                                                                0)
                                                                                                                0)
                                                                                                                H
                                                                                                                •H
                                                                                                                g
                                                                                                                (1)
                                                                                                                (1)
                                                                                                                ft
                    Figure D-4. Smoke  opacity and vehicle speed vs. time  for the first 505 seconds
                         of a cold-start  FTP, VW Rabbit Diesel, EM-474-F,  coal case 5A, 5/15/81.

-------
u
          50
       o
       O.
       o

       cu
       ±£
       o

       00
                                                                                              13
                                                                                              O
                                                                                              CD
                                                                                              O.
                                                                                              CD
                                                                                              r—<
                                                                                              •i—<

                                                                                              E
                                                                                              XT
                                                                                              CD
                                                                                              CD
                                                                                              O.
                                                                                              GO
          30
 20 ==E
          10
          0
                                                                                   End
        Start

     0 sec                                                                   505 'sec

Figure.D-S. smoke  opacity and vehicle speed vs time  for  the first 505 seconds

of a cold-start FTP,  VW Rabbit Diesel, EM-475-F SRC-II  medium cetane, 6/19/81

-------
D
I
                                                                                                   40
                                                                                                   50
                                                                                                   60
                                                                                                         o
                                                                                                        f,
                                                                                                         CD

                                                                                                         ft
                                                                                                        •H
                                                                                                         0)

                                                                                                         0>
                                                                                                        CO
                   t_
                       -Start
End
                     0 Sec
      505 Sec
                       Figure D-6.  Smoke opacity and vehicle speed vs. time for the first 505 seconds

                           of a cold-start FTP, VW Rabbit Diesel, EM-476-F Broadcut Fuel, 5/29/81.

-------
a
i
03
                                                                                                               D
                                                                                                               O
                                                                                                               JS
                                                                                                               tt)
                                                                                                               a,

                                                                                                               W)
                                                                                                               at
                                                                                                              13
                                                                                                               0)
                                                                                                               0)
                       Start

                    0 sec -»•
                 Figure D-7. Smoke opacity  and vehicle speed vs time for the first 505  seconds

                     of a cold-start FTP,  VW Rabbit Diesel, EM-478-F, 25% SRC-II, 7/21/81

-------
o
I
                                                                                                            10
                                                                                                         — 20
                                                                                                      !	 30
                                                                                                           40
                                                                                                           50
           0 __
                                                                                               End   t

                                                                                              505 sec
 3
 0


 J-j
 0)
 ft

 CO
 0)
iH
•H
                                                                                                               •a
                                                                                                               OJ
                                                                                                               QJ
                                                                                                               ft
                    Figure D- B. Smoke opacity and vehicle speed vs time for  the  first 505 seconds

                          of  a  cold-start FTP, VW Rabbit Diesel, EM-482-F, 25% EDS,  8-4-81

-------
                         TABLE D-l.  PERCENT TRACE ELEMENTS IN PARTICULATE MATTER
D

M
o
Fuel
Cycle
Elements, pet
Mg
Al
Si
P
S
Cl
Ca
Ti
Fo
Zn
Sn
Ba
Cr
Ph
Mn
Dr
Cd
K
Cu
Mi
V
sb
Mo
Total 1. nf
Particulate
EM-329-F
FTPC

0.018
0.025
0.048
0.039
0.7-11
0.003
0.082
0.005
0 . 388
0.051
0.008
0.004
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
0.009
0
0.096
0.000
0.000
0
1.517
FTPH

0.011
0.009
0.022
0.029
0.427
0.005
0.035
0.000
0.145
0.040
0.003
0.000
0.008
0.000
0.000
0.017
0
0.003
0
0.016
0.000
0.000
0
0.770
FET

0.004
O.OT3
0.005
o.ooy
0.254
0.001
0.007
0.001
0.029
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
0.001
0
0.005
O.OU1
0.000
0
0.329
EM-453-F
FTPC

0.006
0.005
0.008
0.009
0.157
0.004
0.034
0.001
0.036
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.017
0
0.006
0
0.000
0.000
0.002
0
0.2R5
FTPH

0.006
0.006
0.015
0.024
0.075
0.007
0.032
0.000
0.157
0.018
0.000
0.000
0.016
0.043
0.014
0.000
0
0.005
0
0.011
0.000
0.001
0
0.427
FET

0.007
0.002
0.007
0.023
0.060
0.015
0.019
0.002
0.077
0.033
0.000
0.000
0.010
0.000
0.008
0.014
0
0.002
0
0.005
0.002
0.001
0
0.287
EM-473-F
FTPC

0.032
0.019
0.048
0.041
0.115
0.013
0.112
0.008
0.415
0.033
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
0.009
0
0.053
0.000
0.000
0
0.898
FTPH

0.017
0.016
0.043
0.032
0.070
0.006
0.071
0.007
0.247
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.135
0.000
0.000
0
0.006
0
0.023
0.000
0.000
0
0.673
FET

0.006
0.007
0.025
0.017
0.057
0.009
0.041
0.002
0.167
0.000
0.000
0.000
0:000
0:037
0.000
0.000
0
0.004
0
0.020
0.000
0.000
0
0.392
EH-474-F
FTPC

0.008
0.010
0.018
0.028
0.250
0.005
0.037
0.000
0.174
0.045
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.053
0.000
0.000
0
0.003
0
0.041
0.000
0.000
0
0.600
FTPH

0.009
0.005
0.018
0.037
0.257
0.007
0.031
0.000
0.157
0.030
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.045
0.000
0.000
0
0.004
0
0.008
0.000
0.000
0
O.G08

FET

0.016
0.017
0.032
0.036
0.300
0.010
0.057
0.003
0.310
0.064
0.000
0.002
0.009
0.000
0.014
0.000
0.002
0.004
0
0.023
0.000
0.001
0
0.900
EM-476-F
FTPC

0.020
0.017
0.044
0.037
0.627
0.007
0.068
0.001
0.465
0.061
0.000
0.000
0.013
0.080
0.000
0.024
0
0.011
0
0.079
0.000
0.000
0
1.554
FTPH

0.015
0.010
0.032
0.041
0.551
0.007
0.046
0.003
0.242
0.056
0.006
0.005
0.041
0.085
0.042
0.026
0
0.009
0
0.018
0.000
0.002
0
1.237
FET

0.003
0.005
0.019
0.030
0.646
0.006
0.040
0.001
0.143
0.030
0.000
0.006
0.039
0.054
0.030
0.000
0
0.008
0
0.015
0.000
0.003
0
1.078
EM-478-F
FTPC

0.010
0.014
0.012
0.030
0.844
0.007
0.045
0.000
0.225
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.082
0.000
0.053
0.000
0
0.005
0
0.065
0.000
0.000
0
1.392
FTP,,

0.000
0.004
0.011
0.029
0.712
0.000
0.012
0.000
0.149
0.000
0.026
0.010
0.187
0.328
0.152
0.116
0
0.000
0
0.000
0.000
0.009
0
1 .745
FET

0.000
0.000
0.000
0.022
0.668
0.006
0.020
0.000
0.107
0.000
0.000
0.000
O.OB8
0.241
0.057
0.09B
0
0.003
0
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
1.310
EM-482-F
FTPC
0.011
0.013
0.011
0.027
0.641
0.002
0.025
0.000
0.269
0.019
0.000
0.000
FTPH
0.007
0.004
0.010
0.021
0.402
0.005
0.012
0.000
0.073
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000 0.000
0.000
0.015
0.022
0
0,002
0
0.143
0 . 000
0.000
0
1.200
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
FET
0.003
0.002
0.003
0.017
0.457
0.002
0.008
0.000
0.038
0.018
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
o.ono
0
0.002 j U.001
0
0.006
0.004
0.000
0
0.546
0
! o.ooo
0.005
0.000
0.072
0.626

-------
                                          Residue  Standard Composition
                             Weight %

                               30.6
                               10.9
                                 8.0
                                 5.5
                                 6.6
                                 6.3
                                 7.7
                                 4.7
                                 6.2
                                 2.6
                                 3.1
                                 4.1
                                 3.7
Component (s)
    n-C12
    n-C14
    n-C15
    n-C17
    n-C18
    n-C24
    n-C32
    n~c36
    n-C40
Boiling point(s), °C

      151-196
        216
        254
        271
        287
        302
        316
        369
        391
        449
        466
        496
        522
D
I
                  Figure D-9.   Residue  standard output from high-temperature gas chromatograph run,

-------
D
I
                      Figure  D-10.   "Altamont" crude oil output from high-temperature gas chromatograph run.

-------
Figure D-ll.  Chromatogram of organic solubles from particulate matter,
             vehicle operated on EM-329-F fuel during FTP,

-------
o
                   Figure D-12.  Chromatogram of organic solubles from particulate matter,
                                vehicle operated on EM-329-F fuel during HFET.

-------
o
                    Figure D-13. Chromatogram  of organic solubles from particulate matter,
                                 vehicle operated on EM-453-F fuel during FTP.

-------
D
                   Figure  D-14.   Chromatogram of organic solubles from particulate matter,
                                vehicle operated on EM-453-F fuel during HFET.

-------
o
                   Figure D-15.  Chromatogram of organic solubles from particulate matter,
                                vehicle operated on EM-473-P fuel during FTP.

-------
D

M
CD
                    Figure D-16.   Chromatogram of organic solubles from particulate matter,
                                 vehicle operated on EM-473-F fuel during HFET.

-------
o
                                 i     I
                    Figure D-17.   Chromatogram of  organic  solubles  from particulate  matter,
                                 vehicle  operated  on  EM-474-F  fuel  during FTP.

-------
D
I
KJ
O
                   viJ

                   J5
-~r!
                    Figure D-18.  Chromatogram of organic solubles from particulate matter,
                                 vehicle operated on EM-474-F fuel during  HFET.

-------
             ~r -•
D
ro
                    Figure D-19.  Chromatogram  of organic solubles from particulate matter,
                                 vehicle operated on EM-476-F fuel during FTP.

-------

O
I
ro
                                                                        . -lj...L'J- L  J --,—-H-:.-
                    Figure D-20.  Chromatogram  of organic solubles from particulate matter,

                                  vehicle operated on EM-476-F fuel during HFET.

-------
D
I
                          i '
                                                          !  i
                                   H-i
JLL
                                                                       :r;-~j7prr
                                                                      . ji it'iLl	Jj;'|,
                                                               I  I
                                            Hit
                                                                              H - :+•
                                                                                    I   I
                  Figure  D-21.  Chromatogram  of organic solubles from participate matter,

                               vehicle operated on EM-478-F fuel during FTP.

-------
D
I
NJ
                   Figure  D-22.   chromatogram of organic solubles from particulate matter,

                                 vehicle operated on EM-478-F fuel during HFET.

-------
o
I
to
Ln
                        .:,„!_. i_J..J  -L
                    Figure D-23.  Chromatogram. of organic solubles from particulate matter,

                                  vehicle operated on EM-482-F fuel during FTP.

-------
o

KJ
CT1
                            r—r
- -: — -j. - -L —



i
j

_
• i--
._ . _
.. !


i
r
1
n

- i —
-,.F
• i
u
' ! .
_. ;. ..,


.__U...L._^_
;:.L L i
•
.
- r- -t -
•
, t--l-- -1
1

iij.ii.'ij'jjj-
.;
1
II
                   Figure D-24.  Chromatogram   of  organic  solubles  from particulate matter,
                                 vehicle  operated  on EM-482-F fuel  during HFET.

-------
                                   TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
 1. REPORT NO.        '—~
   EPA  460/3-82-002
                              2.
                                                           3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION>NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
 CHARACTERIZATION OF DIESEL  EMISSIONS FROM OPERATION
 OF A LIGHT-DUTY DIESEL VEHICLE  ON ALTERNATE SOURCE
 DIESEL  FUELS
                                                            5. REPORT DATE
                                                                November 1981
                                                            6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
                                                            8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
              Bruce  B.  Bykowski
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
     Southwest Research Institute
     6220 Culebra Road
     San Antonio, Texas  78284
                                                            10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                                                           11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.

                                                               68-03-2884
 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
      Environmental  Protection Agency
      Mobile Source  Air  Pollution Control
      2565 Plymouth  Road
      Ann Arbor, Michigan  48105
                                                            13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                                                            Task Final Report 6/80-10/81
                                                            14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
 16. ABSTRACT

    Several alternate  source diesel test  fuels  were studied to note their
    effects on regulated and unregulated  exhaust emissions from a 1980
    Volkswagen Rabbit.   Nine fuel blends  were tested,  including a No. 2
    petroleum diesel as base, base plus coal-derived liquids (via SRC-II
    and EDS processes) , shale oil diesel  and jet fuel,  and other blends of
    coal-derived  liquids,  shale oil liquids, and petroleum stocks.  Analyses
    performed include  gaseous hydrocarbons, CO,  NOX,  particulate mass,
    phenols, smoke, odor,  Ames tests, BaP, and  polarity profiled by HPLC.
    Smoke and particulate  increases were  generally  associated with use of
    coal-derived  liquids.
17.
                                KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
    Exhaust Emissions
    Diesel Engines
    Particulate
    Diesel Fuel
    Alternate Fuels
                                              b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                                              Fuel Effects
                                              Alternate Fuel Characterisation
                                              Emission Test Procedures
                                              Emission Characterization
                                                                         c. COSATI Held/Group
   DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

        Release Unlimited
                                                 Unclassified
                                                                            256
                                              20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
                                                 Unclassified
                                                                         22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)

-------