EPA-460/3-76-012
May 1976
STUDY OF EMISSIONS
FROM HEAVY DUTY VEHICLES
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air and Waste Management
Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
Emission Control Technology Division
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
-------
EPA-460/3-76-012
STUDY OF EMISSIONS
FROM HEAVY DUTY VEHICLES
by
Charles M. Urban and Karl J. Springer
Southwest Research Institute
8500 Culebra Road
San Antonio, Texas 78284
Contract No. 68-03-2147
EPA Project Officers: John C. Shelton and Fred Dindoffer
Prepared for
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air and Waste Management
Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
Emission Control Technology Division
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
May 1976
-------
This report is issued by the Environmental Protection Agency to report technical
data of interest to a limited number of readers. Copies are available free of
charge to Federal employees, current contractors and grantees, and nonprofit
organizations - as supplies permit - from the Air Pollution Technical Information
Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North
Carolina 27711; or, for a fee, from the National Technical Information Service,
5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161.
This report was furnished to the Environmental Protection Agency by Southwest
Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas, in fulfillment of Contract No. 68-03-2147,
The contents of this report are reproduced herein as received from Southwest
Research Institute. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed are
those of the author and not necessarily those of the Environmental Protection
Agency. Mention of company or product names is not to be considered as an
endorsement by the Environmental Protection Agency.
Publication No. EPA-460/3-76-012
11
-------
ABSTRACT
In this project, exhaust emissions data were obtained from heavy-
duty vehicles operated on chassis dynamometers. A total of 3Z vehicles
were evaluated, ranging from 7700 kg (17.000 Ibs) to 33,000 kg (73,000
Ibs) gross vehicle weight (GVW). The vehicles included eighteen gas-
oline trucks (or truck-tractors), twelve diesel trucks (or truck-tractors)
and two diesel buses. The evaluations involved an on-the-road deter-
mination for setting dynamometer power and the evaluation on chassis
dynamometers of several steady state, sinusoidal and driving cycle
operating conditions. Chassis version nine-mode or thirteen-mode
evaluations were conducted as appropriate on all vehicles. Each of
the vehicles were evaluated at three different inertia weights and dyna-
mometer road-load settings to simulate an empty vehicle, half payload,
and full rated GVW. On two gasoline and two diesel vehicles, the entire
emissions test sequence was repeated and determinations were made
using alternate driving cycles. Results are summarized by truck for
each test method.
111
-------
FOREWORD
This project was initiated by the Mobile Source Air Pollution Con-
trol Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, 2565 Plymouth Road,
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105. The engineering effort on which this report
is based was accomplished by the Department of Emissions Research
of Southwest Research Institute, 8500 Culebra Road, San Antonio,
Texas. This project, authorized by Contract 68-03-2147, began on
November 15, 1974 and was completed June 8, 1976.
The SwRI Project Leader was Mr. Charles Urban who supervised
all work conducted in this project. The Lead Technician on this project
was Mr. Robert Howard, who served in this function throughout the
project. Mr. Karl Springer was Project Manager and was primarily
responsible for the technical and fiscal negotiation of the initial project
and the subsequent modification and Task Order.
The Project Officer throughout the evaluation of the gasoline trucks
was Mr. Fred Dindoffer of the Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
Branch, Environmental Protection Agency. The Project Officer through-
out the evaluations of diesel trucks was Mr. John Shelton. A Task Order
addition, under Contract 68-03-2196, to evaluate two diesel buses, was
under the direction of Mr. Chester France. Other individuals at EPA
who provided input or were otherwise closely associated with some
aspects of the project include: Mr. Gary Rossow and Ms. Marcia
Williams. This project was identified within Southwest Research In-
stitute as No. 11-4133-001. The Task Order for evaluating the two
buses was identified as 11-4291-005.
IV
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT 1X1
FOREWORD iv
LIST OF FIGURES vii
LIST OF TABLES viii
I. INTRODUCTION l
A. Project Objective •*•
B. Project Plan of Performance ^
C. EMA Involvement ^
D. Project Reviews
II. EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS, PREPARATIONS AND
PROCEDURES 3
A. Chassis Dynamometers 3
B. Exhaust Sampling and Analysis
C. Related Support Facilities *• *•
D. Vehicles l2
E. Vehicle Preparation ^ '
F. Fuels and Lubricants •*• "^
1 ft
G. Procedures and Cycles *• °
H. Vehicle Test Plan 20
I. Calculation Procedures
7 "^
J. Discussion of Truck Driving
K. Data Tapes 23
III. GASOLINE TRUCK RESULTS 25
A. Determination of Road Load 25
B. Discussion of Road Load Simulation 30
C. Results of Chassis Dynamometer Evaluations 33
IV. DIESEL TRUCK RESULTS 43
A. Determination of Road Load 43
B. Chassis Dynamometer Cycle Results 45
V. DIESEL BUS RESULTS 51
v
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd)
Page
VI. SUMMARY 55
LIST OF REFERENCES 57
APPENDICES
A. General Information
B. Description of Vehicles and Driving Cycles
C. Gasoline Truck Results
D. Diesel Truck Results
E. Diesel Bus Results
VI
-------
e
LIST OF FIGURES
1 Vehicle Chassis Dynamometer Arrangements 4
2 Exhaust Emission Instrumentation 7
3 Recommended Exhaust Gas System Schematic 10
4 Gasoline Trucks Tested 15
5 Diesel Vehicles Tested 16
6 Sections of 15 Avg. Driving Cycles 21
7 Nominal Power Relationships for 9, 000-Kg
GVW Gasoline Trucks 35
8 Gasoline Truck Driving Cycle Traces 40
9 Gasoline Truck Driving Cycle NOX Emission Trace 41
10 Diesel Truck Driving Cycle Traces 49
11 Diesel Bus Driving Cycle Traces 53
Vll
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Page
1 Inertia Capabilities of SwRI Medium-Heavy Duty
Chassis Dynamometers 5
2 Description of Metrodata Recording Format 9
3 Description of Vehicles 14
4 Vehicle Coding System 17
5 Gasoline Truck Road-Load Power Settings on
the Chassis Dynamometer 28
6 Summary of Chassis Dynamometer Power Settings 29
7 Gasoline Vehicle Driving Cycle Distance 36
8 Diesel Truck Road Power Settings on the Chassis
Dynamometer 44
9 Diesel Vehicle Driving Cycle Distance 47
10 Diesel Bus Driving Cycle Distance 51
11 Diesel Bus Road-Load Power Setting on the Chassis
Dynamometer 52
VI11
-------
I. INTRODUCTION
This is another in a series of reports concerning emissions from
engines used to power trucks and buses above 21 Z2 kg (6000 Ibs ) gross
vehicle weight (GVW). These reports^ 'v cover work begun at South-
west Research Institute in 1967 on behalf of the Environmental Protection
Agency (formerly the National Air Pollution Control Administration of
HEW). This report describes the evaluations of emissions and fuel
consumption from gasoline and diesel powered vehicles of greater than
4536 kg (10, 000 Ibs) GVW.
A. Project Objective
The objective of this project was to obtain exhaust emissions
data from heavy duty vehicles operated on chassis dynamometers. In
this project, a total of 32 vehicles were evaluated; ranging from 7711
kg (17, 000 Ibs) to 33, 112 kg (73, 000 Ibs) GVW- The vehicles included
eighteen gasoline trucks (or truck tractors), twelve diesel trucks (or
truck-tractors) and two diesel buses. The evaluations involved an on-
the-road determination for the setting of dynamometer power and the
evaluation on chassis dynamometers of steady state, sinusoidal and
driving cycle operating conditions.
B. Project Plan of Performance
The initial project required eight different steady state, three
sinusoidal and four driving cycle evaluations at each of three road-load
conditions for each of thirty vehicles. In addition, continuous (i. e. ,
data obtained every second) data tapes were to be made of all sinusoidal
and transient driving cycle evaluations. A subsequent contract modifica-
tion added chassis version nine-mode evaluations of the eighteen gasoline
trucks, three additional sinusoidal evaluations on six gasoline trucks
and partial processing of all the data tapes. A subsequent Task Order
added the evaluation of two diesel buses. For the buses, one steady
state and one sinusoidal evaluation were deleted.
The contract on which this report is based did not allow for
analysis of the data. Work on a separate contract (68-03-2220) for
analysis of this data is currently in process and will be reported the
latter part of this year. This data analysis contract also includes
final processing of the continuous data tapes.
C. EMA Involvement
With EPA approval, the Engine Manufacturers Association
(EMA) funded the conductance of chassis version thirteen-mode
^-Superscript numbers in parentheses refer to the List of References
at the end of this report.
-------
evaluations on the twelve diesel trucks. The results of these evaluations
are briefly summarized in this report.
D. Project Reviews
A number of meetings, discussions, and status reviews were
held during the course of this project -with the Project Officers and the
other individuals at EPA involved in this project. Monthly progress,
letter, and telephone reports -were issued or made to keep the Project
Officer informed on the project's progress or problems.
-------
II. EQUIPMENT, INSTRUMENTS, PREPARATIONS
AND PROCEDURES
This section contains a brief description of the instruments,
equipment, facilities, preparations and procedures used to conduct this
project. The chassis dynamometer facility, the Metrodata recorder,
and the Labeco 5th wheel were essentially the only items used with
both the gasoline and the dies el trucks.
A. Chassis Dynamometers
Two chassis dynamometers were used in this project. The dyna-
mometer used for the nine-mode tests on the gasoline trucks was a
Clayton CT-200 with 200 hp absorbing capability. To this was con-
nected a 50 hp electric motor which, by means of gear belt drive, could
provide the constant 2000±100 rpm engine speed required for the test.
A similar dynamometer, except without the 50 hp electric motor, was
used for the 13-mode tests on the diesel trucks. Both dynamometers
were used in conducting the other evaluations. The Clayton water
brake dynamometers used in this project are similar to and have
similar road load characteristics to those used in the car size dyna-
mometer for 1975 light duty testing.
One of the dynamometers used during the transient driving tests
is shown in the upper views in Figure 1. The upper left photo also
shows the Labeco 5th wheel which was used for measuring speed and
distance traveled over the road and on the chassis dynamometer. The
left middle photo shows one of many inertia wheel combinations used
to simulate the weight of the vehicle. In addition, this photo shows the
railroad car brake shoes which were used to provide the additional
braking capacity necessary for operation of vehicles over 7250 kg
(16, 000 Ibs). These wheels were direct connected to a Clayton water
brake dynamometer with 219mm (8.625 inch) diameter rolls. The
right middle photo shows the driver aid chart recorder being readied
for driving a transient cycle. The two lower photos show the chain
securing the truck on the dynamometer and the added weight, in the
form of concrete blocks or drums of water, required to minimize
wheel slippage.
As shown in Table 1, a wide range of inertia wheel combinations
are available for evaluation of vehicles on the chassis dynamometer.
Additional combinations are obtainable above 4000 kg, but are not as
readily available as those shown.
B. Exhaust Sampling and Analysis
Two different exhaust sampling techniques and sets of instrumen-
tation were used in this project. One system was used for evaluating
-------
FIGURE 1. VEHICLE CHASSIS DYNAMOMETER ARRANGEMENTS
4
-------
TABLE 1. INERTIA CAPABILITIES OF
SwRI MEDIUM-HEAVY DUTY CHASSIS DYNAMOMETERS
SINGLE DRIVE AXLE
SINGLE DRIVE AXLE
Inertia
Simulation
1,
1.
1.
1,
1,
1,
1.
2,
2,
2,
2,
2,
2,
3,
3,
3,
3,
3,
4,
4,
4,
5,
5,
5,
5,
5,
5,
5,
454
590
771
907
043
088
225
361
542
742
905
041
177
223
359
495
676
402
583
719
856
901
037
173
354
080
262
398
534
579
715
851
Use
(kg)
Unit #1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Wheel
Numbers
,5
,6
,1
,5,
,5,
,6,
,5,
,3
,3,
,3,
,3,
,3,
,3,
,3,
,3,
,3,
,3,
,3,
,3,
,3,
,3,
,3,
•3
,3,
,3,
,3,
,3,
,3,
3
c.
6
1
1
6,
5
6
1
5,
5,
6,
5,
4
4,
4,
4,
4,
4,
4,
4
4,
4,
4,
4,
4,
4
4
1
6
1
1
6,
5
6
1
5,
5,
6,
c;
7
7,
7,
7,
7,
7
7
1
6
1
1
6
5
6
1
5,
S
1
6
1
1
Inertia
Simulation (kg)
Use Wheel
Numbers
Unit # 2
3, 856
5, 216
7, 257
9, 072 or
12,474
11, 113
18,370
9
3, 9
16
3, 9, 9 or
3, 9, 16 **
16, 9
16, 916
TANDEM DRIVE AXLES
Inertia
Simulation
3, 856
7, 257
11, 113
18,370
22, 226
26, 081
33,339
Use Wheel
(kg) Numbers
Unit #2*
9-0
0-16
9-16
9, 16-16
9,16-16,9
9,16,9-16,9
9,16,9-16,9,16
* Other combinations obtainable by changing one or more wheels.
** Obtainable in a few hours by changing out one wheel.
-------
the gasoline trucks and the other for evaluating the diesel trucks and
buses.
1. System for Gasoline Trucks
The Federal Light Duty Test Procedure for cars (below 6000 Ibs
GVW) powered by gasoline and diesel engines involves transient operation
during which the exhaust is diluted by means of a constant volume
sampler (CVS). In this project, a two-speed truck-size CVS, with
nominal 17 to 25 m3/min (600/900 SCFM) flow capacity was used to
acquire dilute samples from the gasoline powered trucks. With some
of the larger engines at high power output, however, this CVS capacity
was marginal. In addition to the bagged samples, the exhaust emissions
and operating parameters were recorded continuously on a strip chart
recorder.
The upper photographs of Figure 2 show the analytical system
for obtaining and measuring the diluted CVS samples. In the upper left
photo, the Metrodata recording system is on the left side of the picture.
This analytical cart and the constant volume sampler were prepared,
calibrated, and used in accordance with the appropriate Federal
specifications and regulations given in reference 13. The center photo
shows the backside of the emissions instrumentation and the numerous
calibration gas bottles. The lower left photo shows the Metrodata
recording system and lower right photo shows the Beckman Model 590
HC/CO Tester which was used for measuring the raw exhaust during
idle.
Nominal full-scale for the emissions and other instrumentation
during transient tests were as follows:
HC by FID - 5000 ppm
CO by NDIR - 2 percent
CO2 by NDIR - 5 percent
NOX by CL - 1000 ppm
VEHICLE SPEED - 96.56 km/hr (60 mph)
ENGINE SPEED - 4000 rpm
MAN. VAC. - 762 mm (30 inches) Hg
CVS TEMP. - 185°C (365°F)
Each of the emissions instruments had variable ranges and the appropriate
range was selected for reading the bagged samples. The output of each
instrument was fed into strip-chart recorders and a Metrodata tape
recording system. The bagged or modal values for each test were
transferred to computer cards for processing.
The Metrodata recording system recorded the meter reading of
each parameter every 0. 2 seconds for 4. 2 seconds, after which an
-------
FIGURE 2. EXHAUST EMISSION INSTRUMENTATION
7
-------
approximate 0.4 second gap occurred prior to the next set of readings.
The Metrodata recording format is given in Table 2. Initially, no
processing of the Metrodata tapes was included in the project. Subse-
quent modification to the contract, along with a separate data analysis
contract, required processing of the tapes. This processing was
accomplished using an Institute-owned Hewlett-Packard 2100 A com-
puter system.
2. System for Diesel Trucks and Buses
Since a number of the diesel units would exceed the capacity of
the CVS, continuous (every second) measurement of the undiluted ex-
haust was used for determination of emission rates. Continuous air
flow measurement was determined and used along with the total carbon
in calculating the emission rates. The rate in grams/minute was cal-
culated from the Metrodata recording tapes by summing the rates for
each second and dividing by the total cycle time. Fuel flow, except in
the 13-mode evaluations, was calculated using carbon balance.
Measurement of HC and CO during idle was attempted on the Beckman
Model 590 HC/CO Tester. Generally, however, the HC and CO values
were too low to obtain a readable value on the available ranges of this
Tester.
The emissions instrumentation essentially followed the require-
ments in the recommended heavy duty gasoline and diesel instrumen-
tation and test procedures'^, 1$). The primary difference between
this recommended system and the current 13-mode instrumentation' '
is the use of a heated CL in place of the NDIR for measurement of
oxides of nitrogen. The recommended system schematic is given as
Figure 3. Since this project was performed under a rapid and
stringent schedule, time did not permit reproducing this system
exactly as shown. The only significant exception to the requirement
in the recommended procedure was that the sample system for the CL,
used in this project was heated to 125°C rather than the specified
190° C. This is of no particular consequence, since the intent of the
heated sample system is to eliminate the need for a water trap before
the converter. This is adequately accomplished by the 125°C temper-
ature. The FID sample system was heated to the specified 190° C.
A Merriam Laminar Flowmeter was used to measure air flow.
Parameters recorded on the strip charts and the Metrodata
tapes and the primary nominal full scale values used were as follows:
HC by FID - 400, 800 and 1600 ppm
CO by NDIR - 0. 3, 0. 8 and 2. 0 percent
CO2 by NDIR - 16 percent
NOX by CL - 1000 and 2500 ppm
VEHICLE SPEED - 96.56 km/hr (60 mph)
ENGINE SPEED - 4000 rpm
8
-------
TABLE 2.
DESCRIPTION OF METRODATA RECORDING FORMAT
Vac,
Rack
or
g?ime|rime| Mph | Rpm Rail
Air
A P
CO | C02I HC
1 Mph
Rpm
Vac. ,
Rack
or
Rail
Air
A P
CO
CO2I HC |NOx
Vac,
Rack
or
Air
TestrTemp
0 0 H + 1 ^ 3 •*•]"•« 0 + 05 2-
£+162+002-008+127-001+2)7+008+123+131+052-003+131-012+205+009+1P1+131+047+341+11
6 :°>+16 2+00 3-006+131 + 000 + 202+008+1 22+13 0 + 05 ?-OOQ+125+000 + 211 + 006+1?1 + 1 31+047 + 3M + 1
16'i'+162 + 00 3-004+12 Q-015 + 21 0 + 010 + 122+1 3 2 + 0^,2-003+14 4-009 + 202 + OOR + 120 + 1 3 0 + 047 + 341 +
1 15 fe'+ 162 +00 3- 00^+1 36> + 00* + 206 + 007+] ??+131-t-OS 2-
+ 117«i+162 + 00 4-002+1? ft-009 + 211 + 01 (I+ l??+13?-»-nS?
1+11^^+162+004-011+13S-004+?04+007+l?0+130+05?-OOft+132-OlO+209+ol0+121+131+047+3
41 + H7(«'+lft2 + 00 5- 001 + 13 ^-006 + 205 + 010+1^1 + 131 + 0^2-007+144-003 + 204 + 006+119+129 + 04? +
341+115^+162+005-010+131-001+213+OOR+121+131+05?-004+123-007+20R+009+120+130+047
+ 341 + 1 16fc+ !«,?+006-004+) 39-010+199+010+122+1 31 + 052-009+1 36 + 000 + 209+00^+121 + 12^ + 04
H+341 + 1161*
FILE NO. = 35 RECORD NO. = 2 LENGTH 405 WORDS
+162+006-00R+133+002+203+OOP+120+130+052-009+124-001+210+007+120+130+047+341+117
e+162+007-003+128-017+208+012+122+131+052-004+13P-002+205+008+120+129+048+341+11
5®+162+007-010+134+003+207+007+120+130+052-OOP+129-010+207+010+122+130+047+341+1
17(S+162+OOP-001+124-OOP+209+012+121+131+051-006+133+000+205+006+120+129+048+341+
115R+162+008-01 1 + 132-006 + 205+007+120 + 130 + 052-005+131-010 + 20« + 010 + 120 + 129 + 047 + 341
+117P+162+008-002+133-003+207+009+121+130+052-008+139-002+205+005+120+128+04P+34
1 + 116(3+162+009-009+122-002 + 215 + 008+) 21 + 130 + 052-003+126-OOQ +206 + 009+121 + 1 28+047 + 3
41+115^+162+009-005+141-008+198+010+120+129+05?-009+137-001+210+007+121+128+047+
341+117fcj+162+010-005+129-007+215+011+121+131+052-003+141-011+201+009+120+128+048
+341+115fei+lft2+010-009+]32+004+204+007+121+130+052-008+123-003+212+009+120+130+04
7+341+117®
Notes:
1. © = End of each column of twenty channels of data
2. RACK or RAIL and AIR AP used with diesel powered vehicles
3. All parameters are recorded as meter deflections with Full Scale = 1000
4. Time is in Hours, Minutes and Seconds (+HHM+MSS+)
5. Each Record of 405 words is ten scans of the twenty channels and requires 4. 17 seconds.
6. Inter-record gap of 0.42 seconds between Records
-------
Vent to
Atmosphere
Span and Span and
Zero GateB Zero Gases
Diesel: 190 C +10 C
- 5°C
Gasoline <2S°C + 10°C p, f\
- 5°C
o
Heavy Duty Exhaust Gas
Sampling and Analytical Train
legend
Paniculate Filler
V/ Flowmeler
— —l^^y Backpressure Regulator with
»*• Internal Control Loop Shown
^^J Line Pressure Regulator will
^~-^ Inltrnal Control Loop Show
(Darktnd Ltg Indicate* Co-nmon Pot I)
Flow Conlrol or N*»dl» Valve
Plug Vilv* or Eijulvalvnl
(Cent»r Port It Common)
|A\\V| -^ Af"
FIGURE 3. RECOMMENDED EXHAUST GAS SYSTEM SCHEMATIC
-------
AIR FLOW 28.32 m3/min (1000 CFM)
AIR TEMP. Readable to 0.5° C
RACK 100 percent
RAIL PRESSURE - 1379 kPa (200 psi)
During steady state and 13-mode evaluations, additional emissions
ranges -were used as necessary.
Every reasonable effort was made to keep the sample line
lengths and the overall response times to the minimum possible. The
total response times from change of engine operating parameter to
maximum step change of the resultant emission measurement were
as follows:
HC 7 seconds
CO 4 seconds
3 seconds
8 seconds
The readily apparent limiting factor in the CL system was the converter.
Further increase in flow rate through the converter beyond that em-
ployed had a drastic effect on converter efficiency.
3. The Chemiluminescence Instrument
In past projects using chemiluminescence, it had been occasionally
noted that NO readings have been higher than NOX under some operating
conditions. Instability has also occurred on occasion. With the gaso-
line trucks in this project, the situation of NO higher than NOX was
found to occur at some operating conditions; primarily the extremely
high power modes. However, due to the expressed time urgency in
this project, no attempt was made to determine the frequency of or
the reason for this occurrence. With the CL set up for the diesel
operation, the NO was often higher than NOX. Several evaluations were
made in an attempt to determine the reason, but the cause could not be
readily determined. Subsequently, the converter was steam cleaned,
the flow rate was reduced, and a few minor instrument modifications
•were made which minimized but did not eliminate this occurrence.
This and other questions encountered with the CL instruments
were discussed with an EPA representative on the CRC- APRAC-CAPI-
1-64 Hydrocarbon, NO and CO Sub-panel. Subsequent contact indicated
that the CRC sub-panel was involved in resolving these questions
involving CL, prior to possible use of CL in future Federal heavy duty
engine test procedures.
C. Related Support Facilities
The previous portions of this section have briefly described the
11
-------
various instruments and equipment used in this project. Although the
extent of instrumentation used may be impressive, the accuracy of the
results is of major importance. This is -where the long range policy
of quality assurance, attention to detail, and concern about test data
reliability that has been the goal of the Emissions Research Depart-
ment was invaluable.
For example, to maintain and perform the specified calibra-
tions, as required by contract or the applicable Federal Registers,
was immense given the number and variety of tests involved. Every
instrument, dynamometer, CVS, pressure gauge, temperature read-
out, etc. , was periodically calibrated according to EPA or SwRI
procedures. Gases for NDIR, FID, and CL, instrument span were
named from SwRI "golden standard" gases which were named by EPA.
These "golden standard" gases also formed the basis for the primary
instrument calibrations.
There are numerous other examples of the support of this
project in terms of daily, weekly, and monthly checks, spans, and
calibrations. Every reasonable attempt -was made to obtain factual
evidence on the emissions and vehicle operation throughout the project.
D. Vehicles
In all, a total of 32 vehicles were evaluated in this project.
Included were 18 gasoline and 12 diesel trucks or truck-tractors and 2
diesel buses. Due to the extended length of time required to complete
the evaluations on a vehicle (from one to two weeks), most vehicles
were obtained from rental or leasing companies. Vehicles which could
not be obtained with the desired engines from the rental and leasing
companies had to be obtained from various other companies or individ-
uals. Keeping a project of this type supplied with vehicles is among
the more difficult and time-consuming tasks involved.
Neither population or sales data were available on specific
engine models used in the over 4, 536 kg (10, 000 Ibs) GVW trucks
specified in this project. Therefore, the tentative selection of truck
engines relied heavily on selections found acceptable in previous
projects. The primary criteria used with respect to gasoline engines
was that Diamond Reo should have a maximum of one engine, Dodge
should have about 10 percent, and the remainder should be made up
with approximately equal representation of General Motors, Ford,
and International Harvester. General Motors' portion in turn would be
about equally represented by Chevrolet and GM Truck and Coach
Division. In addition, no engine model, regardless of popularity,
was to occur more than three times in the trucks finally selected.
Taking into account the available sales data for diesel engines, it was
initially planned for Cummins and Detroit Diesel to each represent
12
-------
between 30 and 40 percent and the remainder to be made up of Mack,
Caterpillar, and possibly Mercedes.
In addition to the requirement to evaluate a representative mix
of engines, the following mix of vehicle types were specified:
No. of Fuel
Axles Type
2 SU
Gasoline
No. of Trucks
Total
Number
Pre 1970 Pre 74 & 1975
1970 to 1973 1974 Later Calif. of Vehicles
3 SU
Gasoline
TT
2 SU
Gasoline
Diesel
18 Trucks
3 SU
Diesel
TT
Diesel
12 Trucks
2 BUS Diesel
SU - Single unit
TT - Tractor trailer
2 Buses
32 Total
Of the two diesel buses, one was to be for city and the other for highway
use.
A tentative list of 30 trucks, based on the preceding require-
ments, was made up and was approved by the EPA Project Officer. As
in other projects of this type, however, the final specific selections
were to a large extent controlled by availability. The resultant
vehicles evaluated in this project are summarized in Table 3 and
are described in more detail in Appendices B-l and B-2. The most .
difficult trucks to obtain were the three-axle single unit and those 'T"-
vehicles that had to be certified for sale in California.
The various types of gasoline trucks tested in this project are
illustrated in Figure 4 and the types of diesel vehicles (except D3DIE)
in Figure 5. All of the 3-axle truck-tractors had two drive axles.
Most of the single unit 3-axle trucks, however, had only one drive axle.
The designated coding used on the figures and throughout the project
are given in Table 4.
13
-------
TABLE 3. DESCRIPTION OF VEHICLES
No.
Desc.*
Year
Make
Engine
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1 7**
18**
19
20**
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
D2GAS
D2GAS
D2GAS
D2GAS
D2GAS
D2GAS
D2GAS
D2GAS
D3GAS
TTGAS
D3GAS
TTGAS
TTGAS
TTGAS
D3GAS
D3GAS
D2GAS
TTGAS
D2DIE
TTDIE
TTDIE
TTDIE
TTDIE
TTDIE
TTDIE
TTDIE
TTDIE
D3DIE
D2DIE
D3DIE
1970
1974
1973
1975
1965
1975
1974
1974
1973
1974
1974
1972
1974
1969
1974
1966
1975
1975
1972
1975
1973
1971
1972
1975
1975
1974
1972
1967
1975
1975
1972
1975
Dodge
Chevrolet
Ford
IHC
Chevrolet
Ford
IHC
Dodge
IHC
IHC
Chevrolet
Ford
CMC
Ford
CMC
Chevrolet
IHC
Ford Cal.
Ford
Ford
IH
Mack
IH
Ford
IH
Ford
m
Dodge
IH
IH
CMC
MCI
Dodge - 318
Chevrolet - 366
Ford - 361
IHC - 345
Chevrolet - 292
Ford - 391
IHC - 392
Dodge - 361
IHC - 345
IHC - 478
Chevrolet - 366
Ford - 477
CMC - 427
Ford - 391
CMC - 427
Chevrolet - 366
IHC - 345
Ford - 389
Cat. 1150
Cummins NTCC-350
Cummins NTC-290R
Mack ENDT-675
Detroit Diesel 8V-71N
Detroit Diesel 8V-71N
Cummins NTC-290R
Detroit Diesel 6L-71N
Cummins V8-903
Cummins NH-220
Cat. 3208
Detroit Diesel 6V-53N
Detroit Diesel 6V-71N
Detroit Diesel 8V-71N
^Coding is described in Table 4.
**Meets California Emission Requirements.
Note: More detailed description is given in Appendix B-l
14
-------
D2GAS
"OVEI, ,OU«Si,, „:',„
RYDER
D3GAS
,f •
1 I
s <. • »' *
TTGAS
FIGURE 4. GASOLINE TRUCKS TESTED
15
-------
TTDIE
D2DIE
BUS
FIGURE 5. DIESEL VEHICLES TESTED
16
-------
TABLE 4. VEHICLE CODING SYSTEM
D2GAS - Single Unit, Two-Axle Gasoline Truck
D3GAS Single Unit, Three-Axle Gasoline Truck
TTGAS -Gasoline Truck Tractor (All Two-Axle)
Used with Single-Axle Trailer During Road Work
D2DIE - Single Unit, Two-Axle Diesel Truck
D3DIE - Single Unit, Three-Axle Diesel Truck
TTDIE Diesel Truck-Tractor (All but one were 3-Axle)
Used with Tandem-Axle Trailer During Road Work
BUS - Two-Axle Diesel Bus
E. Vehicle Preparation
The vehicles were run in what was essentially the as-received
condition. Tune-up of gasoline engines was limited to the following:
Tune-up limits -were established by adding 3 degrees
to the manufacturer's highest specified value for timing
and dwell and by subtracting 3 degrees from the lowest.
The idle rpm limits were established by appropriately
adding or subtracting 100 rpm. If any parameter was out-
side of these tune-up limits, the parameter was adjusted
to the nearest limit.
The primary criteria followed was if the vehicle operated in a
reasonably acceptable manner, no repairs were made. If the vehicle
did not operate in a reasonably acceptable manner, simple repairs were
attempted (i. e. , clean fuel filter, replace spark plug wire, file badly
pitted points, adjust the brakes, tighten bolts on the accessory, etc.).
The preceding simple repairs -were only required on about three
vehicles. Other relatively minor engine or vehicle malfunctions, even
though obvious during the initial shake-down or during the laboratory
evaluations, were not repaired.
F. Fuels and Lubricants
The composition of the gasoline and diesel fuels used in this
project is given in Appendix A-l. The gasoline was leaded Exhaust and
Evaporative Emissions Gasoline. A Type 2-D Diesel fuel was used in
all diesel vehicles except the city bus. A Type 1-D Diesel fuel was
used in the city bus. Lubricant, when required, was the brand and
17
-------
grade specified by the owner of the vehicle.
G. Procedures and Cycles
A chassis version of the Nine-Mode gasoline heavy-duty test
procedure was used with the eighteen gasoline trucks. Steady state,
sinusoidal and driving cycle evaluations were conducted on all 32
vehicles included in this report. Chassis version thirteen-mode
evaluations'^- ' were conducted on diesel vehicles 31 and 32 as part
of the Task Order and on 19 through 30 under a separate project for
the EMA. For all evaluations, except the nine-mode and thirteen-
mode, chassis dynamometer road load settings at 40 mph coincided
with those obtained for each vehicle on the road at empty, half and
full load conditions.
1. Steady State Operation
The steady state operation included idle and 8.05, 16.09, 24.14,
32.19, 48.28, 64.37 and 88.51 kilometer per hour. These steady states
were respectively designated as 00, 05, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40 and 55 SS.
Each steady state mode evaluation was of two minutes duration.
2. Sinusoidal Driving Pattern
A sinusoidal driving pattern was developed at full load conditions
for each truck at each of three speeds (32. 19, 48. 28, and 64. 37 km/hr).
This pattern was then used for all three loads evaluated. In this project
the various sinusoidal driving patterns used were designated 20, 30,
and 40±5 and 20, 30 and 40±2. (The 5 represents an amplitude of 8.05
km/hr and the 2 an amplitude of 3.22 km/hr).
The time period for each individual cycle of the sinusoidal driving
pattern was based on requiring full wide-open throttle and full cut-throttle
operation when operating the plus or minus 8. 05 km/hr sinusoidal under
full load conditions. The driving characteristics required to follow a
±8. 05 km/hr sinusoidal driving pattern at full load is briefly described
as follows:
Slow Transition
to CT / \ i CT (+braking)
+km/hr
*-Time
-km/hr
/ \
Slow Transition
to WOT
-------
The sinusoidal driving patterns were developed as follows:
TT /2B i
/^\ A
, X
— 27T/B
Y = A sin BX
Y1 = AB cos BX = slope
Y11 = AB2 sin BX (=OatX = 0)
at X = 0 slope = AB = max.
at X= TT /2B slope = 0
Let T = X = time
& AV=A - amplitude
& M = A B = AVB = max. slope
.' . V = Vo + AV sin (M/AV)T
(M/ AV) T* = IT/2 atT* = TT/2B
Let M =2AV/Time for WOT Accel from Vo-AV to Vo + AV
." , Tj # = ( TT/4+ ) «- (Time for WOT Accel)
at 0.33T* V=Vo+0. 5 A V
at0.67T* V=Vo+00866AV
at 1. GOT* V=Vo+ AV
atl.33T* V=Vo+0.866AV
Etc. until 4. GOT*
Using these relationships, a table was set up. The table values were then
manually plotted onto the driver's aid chart.
3. Driving Cycle Operation
Driving cycles with nominal average speeds of 8. 05, 16. 09,
19
-------
24.14, and 32.19 km/hr were run in this project. These cycles were
respectively designated as 05, 10, 15, and 20 AVG. These driving
cycles were provided by the EPA specifically for use in this project
and were reported to be computer developed using available input
data from CAPE 21.
The driving cycles are identified in Appendix B-3. This cycle
data was manually plotted onto driver's aid chart paper. These master
copies were then manually copied to provide charts for use in this
project. A section of one each of the plotted cycles for D2GAS, TTGAS,
TTDIE and BUS are given in Figure 6.
H. Vehicle Test Plan
Since the test plan changed as the project progressed, the plan
given in this section will represent the way in which the project was
actually conducted.
After acquisition and preparation of each vehicle, a parameter
representing road-load horsepower was determined at a speed of 64.37
km/hr on the road at each of three loads. Empty load was the nearest
dynamometer inertia weight to the empty weight of the truck, tractor -
trailer combination, or bus with a driver, an observer and essential
road test equipment. Half and full load conditions were obtained using
concrete blocks and/or drums of water or bags of sand. Full load for
test purposes was defined as the nearest available dynamometer inertia
weight lower than the GVW. Half load was the nearest dynamometer
inertia weight to the empty weight plus one half the difference between
the GVW and the empty weight.
The vehicle was then installed onto the chassis dynamometer
and the dynamometer horsepower settings were determined for the
parameter value representing road-load horsepower. After this,
acceleration times were obtained for use in setting up the sinusoidal
driving patterns.
The chassis dynamometer evaluations conducted on the vehicles
were as follows (The nine- or thirteen-mode tests were run at least
twice on each vehicle and all other evaluations were run at empty, half,
and full load):
Gasoline: Trucks 01-18 Nine-Mode Procedure
Eight Steady States
Four Driving Cycles
WOT at 2000 RPM
Trucks 01-07 Six Sinusoidals (20, 30 & 40± 5 and ±2)
Trucks 08-18 Three Sinusoidals (20 & 30±5 and 40± 2)
20
-------
D2GAS
20
180
SECONDS
60
TTDIE
20
180 120
SECONDS
60
BUS
r^\ I 0
300
240
FIGURE 6. SECTIONS OF 15 AVG. DRIVING CYCLES
21
-------
Trucks 17 & 18 Repeat of the Steady States,
Sinusoidals and Driving Cycles
Four Alternate Driving Cycles
Diesel: Trucks 19-30 Thirteen-Mode Procedure
Eight Steady States
Four Driving Cycles
Three Sinusoidals (20 & 30±5 and 40± 2)
Trucks 24 & 25 Repeat of the Steady States,
Sinusoidals and Driving Cycles
Four Alternate Driving Cycles
Buses 31 & 32 Thirteen-Mode Procedure
Seven Steady States (omitted 55 SS)
Two Sinusoidals (20 & 30± 5)
Four Driving Cycles
Continuous data was recorded using the Metrodata recording
system for all sinusoidal and driving cycle evaluations. The data tapes
for gasoline Trucks 1 through 18 could not be evaluated until all
laboratory evaluations were complete. The tapes for Trucks 19 through
30 and Buses 31 and 32 were processed prior to release of each vehicle.
I. Calculation Procedures
The emission rates for the gasoline vehicles were calculated
using an SwRI computer program developed for this purpose and pre-
viously approved by EPAU^). Modifications primarily involved the
output format and units. The program for processing the continuous
(second by second) data utilized the same basic calculations.
Emission rate calculations for the diesel trucks were based on
the prescribed calculations procedure for the thirteen-mode evaluation(13) _
The major exception involved the method for determining total exhaust
flow for the transient evaluations where fuel flow measurements were
not available. The method used was as follows:
HCMW = 12.011 + (HCR*1.008)
TC = CO2 + CO + HC
EF = AF*2897/(2897-(TC*HCMW))
HCMW = Average molecular weight of the
fuel hydrocarbons
TC = Total carbon in the exhaust in percent
AF = Measured air flow into engine
EF = Calculated exhaust flow
22
-------
J. Discussion of Truck Driving
At the start of the project, a number of truck drivers were
approached to determine how trucks are normally driven. The initial
conclusion reached was that one probably cannot arrive at how trucks
are driven by asking truck drivers. Next, several truck operating
manuals were reviewed; and the general instructions given were such
that these manuals are probably of little use in determining how trucks
are driven (or even how they should be driven). The third approach
was to ride in a truck driven by essentially all of the technicians in
this laboratory who have a commercial license and have truck driving
experience. This approach was very informative and even helped to
explain the verbal information initially obtained from truck drivers.
Normal driving of a truck appears to include lugging, revving,
and anything in between or both. The then EPA project manager was
approached to see if EPA had a definition for normal driving of a
truck based on CAPE Zl or any other studies. The answer received was
that to his and the knowledge of those he contacted, EPA did not have
such a definition.
Subsequently, after driving the cycles provided for this project,
it was determined that gear shifting and engine rpm were basically
controlled by the cycles. For example, the cycles for diesel tractor-
trailer combinations fairly frequently have some 8 km/hr steady state
operation after start-up from a stopped position. This essentially re-
quires that the truck be started at or very near the lowest gear available,
regardless of the load. Since sequential gear shifting is required in a
large percentage of the diesel truck-tractors, at least through the first
four or five gears, this essentially establishes the shifting pattern and
engine rpms for low vehicle speed operation. The acceleration rates,
at higher vehicle speeds required by the cycles, generally required the
maximum acceleration rate attainable. This, in essence, tended to
establish the shifting and engine rpms at higher vehicle speeds.
In summary, no norm could be found as to how trucks are driven
for help in driving the transient cycles. In most cases, however, this
lack of a norm has minimal effect on this project since the driving cycles
tended to establish the driving characteristics relative to shifting and
engine rpm. Since the driving characteristics used in this project are
being compared to the overall CAPE 21 driving characteristics (in a
separate analysis project), it will be informative to see how well the
two compare.
K. Data Tapes
Both the continuous and the composite data are being provided to
EPA on 9-track tape as a specific item of this project. The format and
coding system used in making these tapes are given in Appendix A-2.
23
-------
III. GASOLINE TRUCK RESULTS
This section presents the results of the evaluations conducted with
the 18 gasoline trucks (Trucks 1 through 18). These included: road load
determinations for setting dynamometer power; chassis version nine-
mode evaluations; and steady state, sinusoidal and driving cycle evalua-
tions.
A. Determination of Road Load
With the initial gasoline truck, several methods were investigated
for obtaining the 64. 37 km/hr (40 mph) road load conditions to be used
in the chassis dynamometer. This vehicle speed of 64.37 km/hr was
selected on the basis of it being within the speed range at which all the
vehicles can operate while maintaining reasonable differences in power
requirement for the various load conditions (i.e., empty, half and full
load).
Multiple determinations of engine manifold vacuum and of vehicle
acceleration and deceleration times were determined on the road and
on the chassis dynamometer for the first truck. From these evaluations,
it was determined that of the two methods, the use of manifold vacuum
was more straightforward and repeatable. The use of manifold vacuum
is also consistent with the Federal Register in that manifold vacuum is
an accepted alternate method for establishing road-load horsepower
in light duty vehicles. The manifold vacuum results were as follows
on a still and a windy day in the 1970 Dodge truck with a 318 engine
loaded to 7484 kg GVW. In these evaluations, the barometric pressure
varied less than 2.5 mm Hg and the temperature varied less than 3°C.
Manifold Vacuum, mmHg
Date
11-29-74
12-2-74
Direction
S
N
S
N
Measured
305
216
267
267
Average
261
267
Wind
North
Still
In obtaining the preceding manifold vacuums, measurements were taken
both ways over a level road course. Additional determinations were
made holding fixed manifold vacuums over a relatively long distance
and then averaging the vehicle speed at each manifold vacuum. This
alternative procedure gave results that were generally consistent
within 5 to 1 0 mm of manifold vacuum.
Repeatability and reproducibility of acceleration and deceleration
25
-------
times were not as good. None of the readily available roads are exactly
level for the long distances required by such a procedure and this factor
was believed responsible for the variation associated with accels and
deeds. In addition to the variability of the accel or decel times, this
method requires a time consuming trial and error procedure for
establishing the road load horsepower on the chassis dynamometer
from the data obtained on the road.
It is important to note the relationship of manifold vacuum to
engine power output. The following figure illustrates the relationship
between manifold vacuum and percent of maximum engine torque that
was used in a previous EPA project entitled "Emission Control Tech-
nology Assessment of Heavy Duty Vehicle Engines". (1 0) With the first
truck evaluated, the manifold vacuum was about 250 mm of mercury at
7500 kg GVW and 64. 37 km per hour. As can be determined from the
figure, for this operating condition, the relative variation in engine
brake power is less than two tenths of a percent per each millimeter
variation of manifold vacuum. At higher manifold vacuums (i. e. ,
empty truck), however, the effect of variation in manifold vacuum
would be more significant. For example, at 400 mm of manifold
vacuum, the relative engine power varies more than three-tenths of a
percent per each millimeter of manifold vacuum. A value of 400 mm
of manifold vacuum is reasonably typical of road load at 81 km/hr in
light duty vehicles. As an alternative to the road-load versus test-
weight table, the Federal Register accepts this procedure for light duty
vehicles. It was considered doubtful that the 64.37 km/hr road load
manifold vacuums of any of the trucks would exceed 400 mm. Since the
sensitivity of road load to manifold vacuum is less for large trucks than
cars, this procedure was considered suitable for use in this project.
100
(X
O
O
O
OJ (X
M)
C
W
50
100
2°0 300 400
Manifold Vacuum, mm Hg
500
26
-------
Therefore, the use of manifold vacuum was determined to be the
best approach for establishing road load power on the chassis dyna-
mometer especially in light of the rapid schedule of testing required
by this project. It should be pointed out, however, that neither this
procedure or any other currently available procedure enables deter-
mining an actual, accurate numerical value for the vehicle road-load
horsepower in heavy duty trucks. For automobiles, the many problems
associated with attempting to actually measure the vehicle road-load
horsepower have been fairly well documented. In trucks, an additional
problem is the significant friction losses in the drive axle and tires of
the vehicle as a function of vehicle payload weight.
In this project, the manifold vacuums were determined at 64.37
km/hr on the road at full, half, and empty load. Then a determination
was made of the power setting required on the dynamometer to obtain
these vacuums at 64. 37 km/hr. The same vacuum gauge and fifth
wheel as used on road were used on the dynamometer. For this
determination, the truck was empty and all inertia wheels were dis-
connected from the system. (Inertia has no direct effect on steady
state horsepower). This enabled a determination of road load horse-
power -which had the following limitations:
(1) It did not take into account the variation in friction in
the vehicle rear end and tires and in the dynamometer rolls due to
changes in the axle load with changes in vehicle payload. The tires
on the rolls and the physical strength of the dynamometer rolls and
bearings are not capable of sustained operation of a fully loaded
heavy duty truck.
(2) This does not take into account the variation in road
load horsepower with variation in ambient temperature. (Note — in
San Antonio, variation of barometric pressure and humidity condi-
tions have a minimal effect.) No directly-usable temperature cor-
rection factors have been found to be available, and the time limitation
in and the scope of this project prohibited the adaptation and verifica-
tion of existing draft correction factors (i. e. , as in the SAE draft
procedure for determination of fuel consumption in automobiles) or
development of factors specifically for heavy duty trucks.
A summary of the dynamometer power settings, for operating
conditions equivalent to those at 64. 37 km/hr on the highway is en-
closed as Tables 5 and 6. As expected, trucks having the same load
and frontal area (with one exception, Truck 17) require essentially
the same dynamometer power setting. As shown in Table 6, at 64.37
km/hr, approximately 0. 75 kW (1 hp) is required for each additional
454 kg (1000 Ibs) of load. The associated change in manifold vacuum
was nominally 3. 3 mm of mercury.
27
-------
TABLE 5. GASOLINE TRUCK ROAD-LOAD POWER SETTINGS
ON THE CHASSIS DYNAMOMETER
At an operating speed of 64.37 km/hr with no inertia wheels connected
Empty Half Full
D2
1
2
D3
9
11
15
Truck Make Desc. Load, kg kW Load, kg kW Load, kg kW
Dodge Van
Chevrolet Van
Ford
IHC
Van
Van
Chevrolet Van
Ford
IHC
Van
Van
3,402 13.4 5,262 16.4 7,348 21.6
5,534 14.5 7,257 16.4 9,072 20.9
5,398 17.2 7,257 20.9
5,262 17.9 7,257 19.4
5,216 15.5 7,257 17.2
5,216 19.0 7,257 21.6
9,072 24.6
9,072 25.0
9,072 22.4
9,072 25.0
8 Dodge Van
17 IHC Cal. Van
5,262 14.9 7,257 19.4 9,072 21.6
5,216 14.5 7,257 18.0 9,072 20.9
3,946 21.6 5,897 25.4 7,711 27.6
IHC Van 7,257 21.5 12,474 28.5 18,370 35.9
Chevrolet Flatbed 5, 216 5.2 12,474 20.1 17,463 29.8
CMC Dump Tr. 8,224 8.2 12,474 17.9 18,370 27.2
16 Chevrolet Dump Tr. 7,257 12.9 12,474 19.2 18,370 31.3
TT
10 IHC
12 Ford
13 CMC
14 Ford
Tractor
Tractor
Tractor
Tractor
18
Ford Cal. Tractor
7,257 25.4 12,474 35.8 18,370 41.8
7,257 26.8 12,474 35.0 18,370 44.7
7,257 23.9 12,474 32.8 18,370 41.0
7,257 25.4 12,474 33.6 18,370 41.8
7,257 26.1 12,474 33.6 18,370 41.8
28
-------
TABLE 6 . SUMMARY OF CHASSIS DYNAMOMETER
POWER SETTINGS
Truck
Desc.
D2 Van
D3 Van
TT
Other D3
Other D2
7
1
5
3
2
Dyno. Power Settings at Various Loads (Kg)*, in kW
5,216 7,258 9,072 12,474 18,371
16.4
19.4
21.6
25.4
23. 1
28.3
34.3
19.4
35.8
42.5
28.3
T ruck
Desc.
D2 Van
D3 All
TT
D2 Other
Weighted Average
Dyno. Power Change per 454 Kg Change in Gross Load, in kW
0. 79
0.66
0. 70
0. 84
0. 75
Truck
Desc.
All
Approx. Man. Vac. Change
per 454 Kg Change in Gross Load
4 mm Hg.
^'Maximum Variation from average power values shown was
±3 for Vans and ±2 for TTs.
D2 - Single Drive Axle (2 axles total) - Single Unit Truck
D3 - Tandem Axle (3 axles total) - Single Unit Truck
TT - Single Drive Axle (3 axles total) - Tractor-Trailer
29
-------
A limited effort was made to relate these values to the probable
variation associated with obtaining the values on the road. Based on
experience in this project, the repeatability of the manifold vacuum
determination is estimated to be around ±5 to 7 mm of mercury. Based
on very limited data on one truck and a cursory analysis using formulas
in the SAE Draft Procedure for Fuel Economy, change in manifold vacuum
due to change in air temperature is estimated to be about 4 to 5 mm of
mercury per 6°C. It is probably reasonable to conclude that overall
reproducibility of the road load manifold vacuum determinations in this
project would be on the order of 1 2 mm of mercury. A 12 mm change
in manifold vacuum would be equivalent to a nominal 2 to 3 kW change
in dynamometer power setting.
B. Discussion of Road Load Simulation*
An important aspect associated with a project of this type involves
the simulation of road load on the chassis dynamometer. The problems
relative to road load with heavy duty trucks involves obtaining a road
load setting for the truck and then simulating the road load over a wide
speed variation on the chassis dynamometer. These same problems
exist with automobiles, but have a much less significant effect, since
the Clayton water brake type chassis dynamometer by either design or
chance appears to more closely simulate automobile road load horse-
power throughout a range of vehicle speeds.
First, a brief review of the factors affecting road power.
Typical expressions for the components of road load horsepower
Rolling Resistance = A Coefficient x Weight x Velocity
Air Resistance = A Coefficient x Frontal Area x (Velocity)3
Road Grade = Weight x Grade x Velocity
Road load horsepower is then equal to the sum of the three components.
For dynamometer simulation of operation on a level road, the road
grade is not a factor and only rolling and air resistance need be simulated.
Using the same reference, the equations for use with typical vehicles
can be reduced to:
R. R. HP = Weight x MPH/25, 000
A. R. HP = (Frontal Area in ft2) x (MPH)3 /300, 000
-Section B is not a specific contract requirement, but is felt to be of
sufficient importance to be included in this report for illustrative pur
poses. Therefore, this section retains in English units the formulas
and other information originally given in English units.
30
-------
Assuming the effective frontal areas are 21 ft2 for standard size
cars and 93 ft2 for trucks 20, 000 GVW and over, the following results
are obtained.
MPH
10
20
30
40
50
55
Road Horsepower
5, 000 Ib Car
RR
2
4
6
8
10
11
AR
<1
1
2
5
9
12
Total
2
5
8
13
19
23
25, 000 GVW Truck
RR
10
20
30
40
50
55
AR
< 1
3
8
20
39
52
Total
10
23
38
60
89
107
75, 000 GVW Truck
RR
30
60
90
120
150
165
AR
<1
3
8
20
39
52
Total
30
63
98
140
189
217
Now we -will examine the preceding values in relation to the
Clayton chassis dynamometer. In one of the automotive chassis dyna-
mometer units at this laboratory the friction horsepower in the dyna-
mometer system for a 5, 000 pound vehicle is about 6 hp. This requires
a load setting in the water brake dynamometer of 7.4 per the Federal
Register (13.4-6). Since the water brake horsepower varies approxi-
mately as the cube of the MPH, the water brake essentially simulates
the air resistance portion of the road horsepower. In addition, there
is a small amount of windage resistance in the system., and for the
sake of example we will assume windage to be 0.6 hp and the total
simulation of air resistance equals to 8 hp (7.4 + 0.6). This
agrees reasonably well with the 9 hp as previously determined using
the formula.
Simulation of an empty truck (^'10, 000 pounds) driven at a road
speed of 40 mph required a nominal load setting in the chassis dyna-
mometer of about 20 horsepower; based on cursory examination of the
values obtained in this project. With 25, 000 pounds load, the setting
was about 35 to 40 horsepower and with 40, 000 pounds was about 50 to
55. The actual air resistance based on the preceding formula is
supposed to be about 20 horsepower. Therefore, it appears that the
air resistance portion of the road load is fairly well simulated for
empty and lightly loaded trucks and is too high for heavily loaded
trucks. It should be noted that in an enclosed van the loading of the
truck has essentially no effect on the air resistance component of
road load.
In order to more exactly simulate the road load with heavier
trucks, it would become necessary to determine the value of the rolling
and air resistant components. The air resistance component could
then be simulated by the water brake and the rolling resistance com-
ponent could be simulated by frictional drag of possibly a constant
31
-------
torque dynamometer. Reasonable methods to make the determinations
on the road and to obtain simulation of the rolling resistance portion
of the road horsepower, are not currently available. This is an area
where some research effort and possibly some demonstrative design
and development effort appears to be worthwhile.
In transient operation the primary factor is the inertia, with
road load setting having a much less significant effect. The road load
horsepower setting in the chassis dynamometer has essentially no
effect on heavy accelerations and decelerations near zero speed.
However, the importance increases at a rate varying from almost a
linear function of the vehicle speed at low speeds to almost a cubic
function near maximum speed. Or to state it another way, the horse-
power available for acceleration is equal to the gross rear wheel
horsepower minus the steady speed road load horsepower. Therefore,
any inaccuracies in road load horsepower when it is low (i.e., low
speeds) have a negligible effect. Inaccuracies when road load horse-
power is high (i.e., high speeds) can have a significant effect, however.
In summary of this and the previous section:
1. Consistent determination of road-load horsepower at
a single speed on the road is difficult and time con-
suming. The determinations are significantly affected
by the air temperature, wind speed and direction,
levelness of the road, tire temperature, etc.
2. Reasonable methods are not presently available to
enable breakdown of the total road-load horsepower
into the rolling and air resistant components from
field operations.
3. The present Clayton water brake chassis dynamometer
units do not accurately simulate the road load horsepower
over a wide speed range for very heavily loaded trucks
from a single preset load-speed condition, such as 40
mph, as used in this project.
4. In heavy acceleration and cut-throttle operation, such
as in the driving cycles used in this project, inertia has
the primary effect. Therefore, the results of this
project provide reasonably good simulation of similar
cyclic road operation.
5. If the road-load could be broken down into the rolling
resistance and air resistance components and if these
components were then individually simulated on a
chassis dynamometer, the simulation of road operation
32
-------
could be significantly improved. Some research effort
and possibly some demonstrative design and develop-
ment effort involving road load simulation appears to
be worthwhile.
As a result of this discussion of road-load simulation in the
chassis dynamometer laboratory evaluations, it is quite likely for those
road-loads for heavily loaded trucks (at or near gross or combined
vehicle weight), that at speeds above 40 mph, the road load will be
overstated. At speeds below 40 mph, the road load will be understated.
The amount of over or under simulation will, of course, depend on
the vehicle road-load power-speed relationship and the extent of road
speed above or below 40 mph.
C. Results of Chassis Dynamometer Evaluations
The chassis dynamometer evaluations on the 18 gasoline trucks
included: nine-mode, steady state, sinusoidal, and driving cycle oper-
ation. The results of the steady state and cyclic evaluations at empty,
half, and full loads, the nine-mode evaluations and the 2000 rpm WOT
operation are summarized for each gasoline truck in Appendix C.
1. Chassis Version Nine-Mode Emissions
The nine-mode emissions evaluations were conducted on the
chassis dynamometer. Emission rates in grams per minute were
calculated using the CVS diluted exhaust. The fuel flow rate was
calculated from a carbon balance of the exhaust gases. In addition
to the nine-mode evaluations, duplicate determinations were made of
wide-open throttle (WOT) operation at 2000 rpm.
The bagged composite nine-mode and the composite modal re-
sults for the eighteen gasoline powered trucks are summarized in
Appendix C-20. Individual modal results (from the continuous data
recorded on chart paper) for one nine-mode for each gasoline truck
evaluated are given in Appendix C- 21.
The overall average bagged composite results and the overall
average of the composite of the modal results were as follows for the
chassis version nine-mode evaluations on the 18 gasoline trucks.
Bag Results Modal Results
Emission in Relative % in Relative %
HC 100 100
CO 99 100
CO2 97 100
NOX 90 100
Fuel 97 100
33
-------
These data indicate that the bag composite and the continuous modal
composite produce essentially the same results. The only possible
exception is the NOX> if 10 percent overall average difference in NOX
can be considered as being significant. The modal data for Truck 03,
the first truck to have nearly a 10 percent difference, was evaluated to
determine the probable reason for the difference. In this truck, the
average NOX values for the 254 mm (10") Hg modes were 3 percent
lower than the values for the last three seconds; and the average for the
76 mm (3") Hg modes was 6 percent lower than the last three seconds.
This accounts for about 4 to 5 out of the 10 percent total difference in
the composite NOX values. The other 5 to 6 percent is not readily
accounted for and possibly represents a summation of individually in-
significant losses, interferences, etc. Some of the data for the other
trucks were cursorily reviewed, and the general tendency (with a few
exceptions) is for the NOX to increase during the 254 mm Hg and 76 mm
Hg modes; and therefore, generally account for part of the difference
between the composite values.
2. Steady State Operation
The steady state operation included idle and 8.05, 16.09, 24.14,
32.19, 48.28, 64. 37 and 88. 51 kilometers per hour. These steady
states were respectively designated as 00, 05, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40 and
55 SS. In a few trucks at full load operation, the 88.51 km/hr speed
(55 SS) could not be attained. In such cases, a designation proportional
to the speed attained is given on the appendix tables.
It quickly became apparent that there was no consistent relation-
ship between the empty, half and full load steady state tests at the slower
vehicle speeds. Based on the information from this (as discussed in
Sections III. A. and III. B.) and other projects, Figure 7 has been deve-
loped to explain the probable reason for this lack of consistent relation-
ship. The values shown in the figure are nominal values for illustration
purposes only.
The figure illustrates the following: If the chassis dynamometer
has a 3 kW (4 hp) difference between full and half load at 60 km/hr, at
30 km/hr, the difference is only 0. 75 kW (1 hp). The frictional power
in the overall truck-dynamometer system, however; essentially varies
directly with speed; and at 30 km/hr would be about one-half the power
at 60 km/hr. As the speed is decreased further, the difference in
dynamometer power becomes essentially negligible and the normal
variability of the overall test procedure exceeds the actual difference
due to a change in load. In the transient cycles, the inertia is the
primary factor and the effects of higher inertia loads on emissions and
fuel consumption in transient cycles generally appears to be significant.
34
-------
40 r
Load
Empty
Nominal
Chassis 20
Dynamometer
Power
Setting
60
FIGURE 7. NOMINAL POWER RELATIONSHIPS FOR
9, 000-KG GVW GASOLINE TRUCKS
3 . Sinusoidal Driving Pattern
Sinusoidal driving patterns with average speeds of 32.19, 98.28
and 64.37 were run in this project. With the gasoline trucks, a rea-
sonably appropriate gear-axle ratio could be selected for each of the
sinusoidal patterns. The sinusoid period (reciprocal of the frequency)
is given for each truck in Appendices C-l through C-18 on the Tables
XX -4.
4. Driving Cycle Operation
Driving cycles with nominal average speeds of 08, 16, 24, and
32 km/hr (5, 10, 15 and 20 mph) were run in this project. These driving
cycles are identified in Appendix B-3. The designated distance and the
actual distance traveled during operation of the driving cycles on the
chassis dynamometer are given in Table 7.
In general, the distances traveled by the D2GAS trucks were not
35
-------
TABLE 7 . GASOLINE VEHICLE DRIVING CYCLE DISTANCE
Truck
No. Desc.
01 D2
02 D2
03 D2
04 D2
05 D2
06 D2
07 D2
08 D2
09 D3
Driving
Cycle
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
Distance, kilometers
Empty
1.34
2.62
4. 02
5.79
1.40
2.62
4. 18
5. 78
1.34
2.64
4. 14
5.84
1.37
2.62
4. 18
5.8
1.35
2.66
4.17
5. 94
1.34
2.64
4.09
5. 92
1.38
2.69
4.10
5. 89
1.35
2.66
4. 15
5.92
1.59
2. 78
4. 23
6.34
Half
1.34
2.59
4.02
5.76
1.38
2.64
4. 12
5. 70
1.35
2.64
4.12
5.75
1.35
2.66
4.07
5.83
1.42
2. 70
4.17
5.92
1.34
2.66
4. 10
5.97
1.38
2. 67
4. 10
5.95
1.35
2.72
4. 10
6. 02
1.58
2. 74
4. 07
6. 03
Full
1.35
2.62
3.88
5.84
1.42
2.69
4. 20
5.75
1.37
2.64
4.12
5. 75
1.38
2.64
4.04
5.91
1.43
2.67
4.17
5.86
1.35
2.66
4.12
5.94
1.40
2.66
4.09
5.99
1.35
2.69
4.15
5.95
1.53
2.56
3.80
5.50
36
-------
TABLE 7 (Cont'd). GASOLINE VEHICLE DRIVING CYCLE DISTANCE
Truck Driving
No. Desc. Cycle
10 TT 05
10
15
20
11 D3 05
10
15
20
12 TT 05
10
15
20
13 TT 05
10
15
20
14 TT 05
10
15
20
15 D3 05
10
15
20
16 D3 05
10
15
20
17 D2 05
10
15
20
17 D2 05
Repeat 10
15
20
Distance, kilometers
Empty
1.87
3.09
4.94
6.92
1.66
2.77
4.25
6.44
1.80
3. 01
4. 78
6.73
1.74
3.03
4.76
6.68
1. 79
3.06
4.86
6.84
1.63
2.77
4. 20
6.52
1.61
2.72
4. 17
6.37
1.35
2.66
4.15
5.94
1.35
2.67
4.15
5.95
Half
1.79
3.03
4. 75
6. 44
1.61
2.69
4. 10
6. 20
1. 79
2.99
4.72
6.44
1. 75
2.99
4. 76
6.69
1. 74
2.98
4.62
6.42
1.59
2. 75
4.23
6.47
1.63
2. 75
4. 23
6. 47
1.37
2.67
4.12
5.99
1.35
2.64
4.12
5.89
Full
1.75
2.88
4.59
6. 28
1.54
2.64
3. 78
5. 83
1. 74
2.74
4.49
5.99
1. 74
2.95
4.55
6.31
1. 71
2.74
4.36
5.89
1.58
2.64
4.02
6.20
1.58
2.64
3.99
6.10
1.35
2.66
4. 15
5.92
1.34
2.62
4.07
5086
37
-------
TABLE 7 (Cont'd). GASOLINE VEHICLE DRIVING CYCLE DISTANCE
Truck
No. Desc.
17 D2
Alt.
Cycles
18 TT
18 TT
Repeat
18 TT
Alt.
Cycles
Driving
Cycle
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
Distance, kilometers
Empty
1.38
2.62
4. 14
5.57
1.79
2.90
4.80
6.73
1.79
3.01
4.83
6.73
1.53
3. 07
4.99
6.26
Half
1.38
2.62
4.12
5.57
1.79
2.86
4.73
6.44
1. 79
2.90
4. 73
6.47
1.53
3. 01
4.86
6. 07
Full
1.37
2.59
4. 07
5.52
1.72
2. 77
4.52
6. 08
1.74
2.78
4.51
6.15
1.53
2.86
4.57
5. 73
DESIGNED DISTANCES
Truck
No. Desc.
17
09
15
10,
13,
18,
18
D2
Repeat
,11, D3
, 16
12, TT
14
Repeat
Driv.
Cycle
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
km
1.
2.
4.
5.
1.
2.
4.
6.
1.
3.
4.
6.
36
66
13
94
63
78
29
50
78
06
85
85
Truck Driv.
No. Desc. Cycle
17 D2 05
Alt. Alt. 10
15
20
18 TT 05
Alt. Alt. 10
15
20
km
1.
2.
4.
5.
1.
3.
5.
6.
38
60
11
56
52
13
17
49
38
-------
significantly affected by the load since these trucks could come relatively
close to driving the cycle. In most cases, however, the computer generated
stairsteps in the cycles were rounded-off by the truck at the higher loads.
The cycle distances traveled by the D3GAS trucks were significantly
affected by load since generally the cycle could only be essentially fol-
lowed at empty load. The TTGAS tractor-trailers, generally having the
same loading but higher horsepower to weight ratios than the D3GAS
trucks, could follow the cycles somewhat better than the D3GAS trucks.
Sections of the D2GAS and TTGAS driving cycle traces are given in
Figure 8.
5. Repeat Runs and Additional Driving Cycles
The repeat runs and the additional driving cycles were conducted
on Trucks 17 and 18. Both of these trucks were 1975 models certified
for California. During the road work these trucks appeared to be among
the least repeatable of all the trucks tested. This appeared to be due
to the EGR systems. It was therefore anticipated that the EGR systems
on both trucks would also decrease repeatability of the chassis dynamo-
meter evaluations. The data in Appendices C-17 and C-18 show that the
repeatability during the emissions evaluations, however, was quite good.
6 . Continuous Data Analysis
A Metrodata 20-channel recording system was used to continuously
record the sinusoidal and driving cycle data. Initially no provisions were
made in the contract for processing the data. Subsequently, a contract
modification and a data processing contract were received. However,
by this time the laboratory evaluations of the gasoline trucks were almost
complete. As expected, under these circumstances, difficulties were
encountered with some of the data on several of the trucks. Fortunately,
however, nearly all of the problems were correctable or of no significance.
With some emissions, the values at or near idle relative to values
at or near WOT are greatly different (i.e. , with gasoline trucks, the
value for NOX at WOT has been a hundred or more times greater than
the NOX at idle). When recording the driving cycles, therefore, the
range required to contain the spikes during acceleration often does not
enable good readability at some of the other operating conditions. This
is illustrated in the reasonably typical emissions trace shown in Figure 9.
With the gasoline trucks, the following table illustrates the re-
lationship between composite emissions rate and average meter reading
(meter reading scale is 0 to 100).
39
-------
120
Seconds
TRUCK 06 D2GAS 15 AVG. CYCLE
Half Payload
10
J_
40
30
20
10
o,
Seconds 18°
TRUCK 13 TTGAS 15 AVG. CYCLE
Half Payload
FIGURE 8. GASOLINE TRUCK DRIVING CYCLE TRACES
40
-------
FIGURE 9. GASOLINE TRUCK DRIVING CYCLE
NOx EMISSION TRACE
41
-------
Average meter
Emission g/min divisions
HC 1 1.5
CO 10 3.0
COz 100 I4-0
NOX 1 2.0
On some of the driving cycles, the NOX has been as low as 1 g/min. A
1 percent of full scale zero shift, therefore, would result in a 50 percent
change in the average value calculated from the continuous chart for
such a test. (It should be emphasized that this does not apply to the bag
readings, which are always read at values above 10 percent and gen-
erally above 20 percent of full scale.) For determination of emissions
during specific accelerations, however, the potential for inaccuracy
generally becomes negligible. For example, NOX emissions during
idle and cut-throttle operation, in a gasoline truck, are almost zero
but are generally high (between 20 to 80 percent of full scale) during
accelerations and high speed operations. A 1 percent of full scale, NOX
zero shift would generally result in only a few percent inaccuracy for
operation other than idle, cut-throttle or low speed steady-state.
In summary, with the gasoline trucks, the continuous data should
provide accurate data for all conditions at which significant levels of the
specific emission are produced. In general, this includes accelerations
for all emissions and decelerations for all emissions except NOX.
6. Other Discussion
From high HC emissions obtained with Truck 1 7 in the CT mode,
of the 9-mode test, it was apparent that the deceleration rate control
device was not functioning properly. With Truck 18, WOT acceleration
was somewhat poor, possibly due to a malfunctioning of the power valve
system in the carburetor. The deceleration rate control device was
checked during initial tune-up and was not functioning. It was deter-
mined that the tubing to the vacuum operated plunger on the carburetor
was kinked, thereby closing off the line.
After eliminating the kink in the tubing, the electronic speed
sensor in the decel device system was found to be malfunctioning and
would not allow the engine to return to idle rpm. These situations with
Truck 18 were discussed with the EPA Project Leader and the decision
was reached to run the truck in the as-received condition. The only
other occurrence of some significance with Truck 18 was that the air
pump mounting bolts loosened during the dynamometer evaluations and
made the pump inoperative. It should be noted that both Trucks 17 and
18 were brand new.
42
-------
IV. DIESEL TRUCK RESULTS
This section presents the results of the evaluations conducted with
the 12 diesel trucks (Trucks 19 through 30). These included: road load
determinations for setting dynamometer horsepower; and steady state,
sinusoidal and driving cycle evaluations. With EPA concurrence,
chassis version 13-mode evaluations were determined on these 12 trucks
for the Engine Manufacturers Association (EMA). With EMA concur-
rence, the results of the 13-mode evaluations in terms of grams per
minute are summarized in this report.
A. Determination of Road Load
Methods evaluated for the determination of road-load included:
a ball-type flowmeter, total fuel used at constant speed over a fixed
distance, and average CC>2 (using a bag) at constant speed over a fixed
distance (and rail pressure with Cummins engines). Determination of
rack position was considered but was not used in determining road load.
The change in rack position from empty to full load was considered too
small to enable reliable determinations (i.e., 2 percent rack change
in Truck 19, 6 percent in Truck 21). All of the methods tried, except
rail pressure, left something to be desired.
The flowmeter approach is desirable since it provides continuous
(although somewhat erratic) data and takes considerably less time;
therefore allowing for more determinations. However, the flowmeter
approach appears to be applicable to only a very limited number of
trucks. The bagged CC>2 method appeared to be the least reliable.
With Cummins engines, there is much less problem in determining
road load, since the rail pressure appears to be relatively stable and
is quick and easy to determine. Extreme care is required, however,
to assure that the system used in measuring the rail pressure does not
affect the operation of the engine. It has been found that small volume,
rigid, air-free lines and measuring devices are required. The deter-
mination of road-load using rail pressure appears to be about equivalent
to the determination of road-load using manifold vacuum in gasoline
trucks. The determination of road-load, using total fuel consumed over
a fixed distance, was found to be reasonably reliable. This method,
however, is among the more difficult and time-consuming. Unfor-
tunately, the use of this method was considered necessary with most
of the diesel vehicles tested.
A summary of the dynamometer power settings, for operating
conditions equivalent to those at 64.37 km/hr on the highway, is enclosed
as Table 8. The previously discussed evaluations with gasoline trucks
concerning the significance of this dynamometer horsepower setting
also applies to diesel trucks. In general, diesel trucks and truck-tractors
having the same load, frontal area and number of drive axles require
similar dynamometer power settings.
43
-------
TABLE 8. DIESEL TRUCK ROAD POWER SETTINGS
ON THE CHASSIS DYNAMOMETER
At an operating speed of 64. 37 km/hr with no inertia wheels connected
Empty Half Full
Truck Make Desc. Load, kg kW Load, kg kW Load, kg kW
D2
19 Ford Van 5,2l6 15.7 7,257 21.6 9,072 26.1
29 IH Van 7,257 23.1 11,113 26.8 18,370 29.8
D3
28 Dodge Dump tr. 7,257 15.3 11,113 22.4 18,370 35.8
30 IH Refr. Van 7,257 21.6 11,113 27.6 18,370 38.0
TT
20 Ford Tractor 11,113 29.8 22,226 44.7 33,339 55.2
21 IH Tractor 11,113 23.9 22,226 41.8 33,339 53.7
22 Mack Tractor 11,113 38.8 22,226 67.1 33,339 85.0
23 IH Tractor 11,113 29.8 22,226 49.2 33,339 6l.l
24 Ford Tractor 11,113 23.9 22,226 37.3 33,339 6l.l
25 IH Tractor 11,113 20.9 22,226 41.8 33,339 6l.l
26 Ford Tractor 7,257 27.6 14,515 37.3 21,772 47.7
27 IH Tractor 11,113 28.3 22,226 46.2 33,339 68.6
44
-------
B. Chassis Dynamometer Cycle Results
The chassis dynamometer evaluations on the 12 diesel trucks
included: 13-mode (for EMA), steady state, sinusoidal and driving cycle
operation. The results of the steady state and cyclic evaluations at
empty, half, and full loads, and the 13-mode evaluations are summarized
for each diesel truck in Appendix D.
1. Chassis Version 13-Mode Emissions
The 13-mode emissions determinations were conducted for the
EMA and were presented in detail in a report to EMA(l^). These 13-
mode evaluations were conducted on the chassis dynamometer in
accordance with the method given in reference 16; with the exception
of using the same emissions instrumentation as used for the steady
state and cyclic evaluations. Only the results in terms of grams per
minute are summarized in this report.
2. Steady State Operation
The steady state operation for the diesel trucks included idle and
8.05, 16.09, 24.14, 32.19, 48.28, 64. 37 and 88. 51 kilometers per hour .
In cases where the 88.51 km/hr could not be attained, a designation
proportional to the speed attained is given in the appendix tables. As
with the gasoline trucks, the water brake dynamometer was used to set
the road-load power during operation of the vehicle on the chassis
dynamometer.
3 . Sinusoidal Driving Pattern
The sinusoidal driving pattern was developed and driven at average
speeds of 32. 19, 48. 28 and 64, 37 km/hr. The sinusoid period (reciprocal
of the frequency) is given for each truck in Appendices D-l through D-12
on Tables XX-4.
With a few of the diesel trucks, it was difficult to select a gear-
axle ratio which would enable staying above the recommended lower
operating speed of the engine. The primary difficulty was in determining
the acceleration rates for setting up the sinusoidal pattern, rather than
in the driving of the resulting pattern. Determining the acceleration
rate required starting a few km/hr below the lowest speed of the sinu-
soidal pattern. An alternate method developed was to narrow down the
speed range over which the acceleration rate was determined.
4. Driving Cycle Operation
Driving cycles with nominal average speeds of 8, l6, 24 and 32
km/hr (5, 10, 15 and 20 mph) were run in this project. These driving
cycles are identified in Appendix B-3. The designed distance and the
45
-------
actual distance traveled during operation of the cycles on the chassis
dynamometer are given in Table 9.
Essentially all of the dies el trucks could attain the maximum
speed required by the cycles. A reasonably typical section of a driving
cycle trace is shown in Figure 10. This trace illustrates that, except
for gear shifting, inability to attain some of the acceleration rates and
the rounding off of sharp corners, the diesel trucks could generally
follow the driving cycles. Therefore, with few exceptions, load had
no significant effect on distance traveled.
5. Repeat Runs and Additional Driving Cycles
The repeat runs and additional driving cycles were conducted on
Trucks 24 and 25. The data in Appendices D-6 and D-7 show that the
repeatability was generally good.
6 . Continuous Data Analysis
For the diesel trucks, the Metrodata recording of the transient
data was generally processed and reviewed before release of the truck.
It is this data which is reported in the appendices.
With the diesel trucks, since a CVS was not used, the relation-
ship between calculated grams per minute and reading on the emissions
instrument is not as straightforward. The following, however, is
suitably accurate for illustrative purposes:
Average meter
Emission g/min divisions
HC 1 20
CO 1 5
CO2 100 10
NOX 1 5
With the diesel trucks, the NOX values were generally 2 g/min and greater
for the driving cycles. Therefore, the potential for error in the composite
results due to zero shift is relatively small (i.e., always less than 10
percent per chart division). The potential for error for HC is about the
same as for NOX. With CC>2, the potential for error is very small (i. e. ,
less than 3 percent per chart division). The potential for error for CO,
however, is more significant on a percentage basis (20 percent) but is
insignificant on an absolute basis (0.2 g/min). With the diesel trucks,
continuous data should provide reasonably accurate data over all con-
ditions for all emissions. Although the CO can vary significantly on a
percentage basis, it should not vary greatly on an absolute basis in terms
of grams per minute.
46
-------
TABLE 9 . DIESEL VEHICLE DRIVING CYCLE DISTANCE
Truck
No. Desc.
19 D2
20 TT
21 TT
22 TT
23 TT
24 TT
24 TT
Repeat
24 TT
Alt.
25 TT
25 TT
Repeat
Driving
Cycle
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
Distance, kilometers
Empty
1.62
2.96
5.12
6.97
1.93
3.33
4.58
5.63
1.84
3.58
4.57
5. 73
1.80
3.54
4.52
5.60
1.86
3.51
4.44
5.77
1.87
3.49
4.56
5. 73
1.83
3.57
4.65
5.84
1.68
3.46
5. 04
5.69
1.85
3.56
4.66
5.92
1.82
3.47
4.58
5. 75
Half
1.61
2. 83
5.03
6.91
1.90
3.50
4.50
5. 75
1.87
3.43
4.50
5. 70
1.68
3.09
4.48
5.62
1.88
3.47
4.47
5.66
1.79
3.44
4.55
5. 72
1.88
3.50
4.63
5. 78
1.45
3.39
5. 07
5.67
1.92
3.61
4.64
5.79
1.88
3.49
4.51
5.68
Full
1.62
2.89
5.15
6.94
1.86
3.48
4.46
5.67
1.86
3.18
4.44
5.60
1.78
3.34
4.27
5.30
1.81
3.39
4.38
5. 58
1.83
3.47
4.43
5.61
1.84
3.47
4.56
5.68
1.63
3. 24
4. 79
5.66
1.91
3.55
4.49
5.76
1.83
3.44
4.47
5.59
47
-------
TABLE 9 (Cont'd). DIESEL VEHICLE DRIVING CYCLE DISTANCE
Truck
26
TT
27
TT
28
D3
29
D2
30
D3
Truck
No.
19, 29
Desc,
D2
20, 21, TT
22, 23,
24, 24 Repeat
25, 25 Repeat
26, 27
Driving
Cycle
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
Distance, kilometers
Empty
2.07
3.48
4.88
6.86
1.87
3.50
4.50
5. 76
1.96
3.69
4.50
5.81
1.86
3.32
4.30
6.63
1.60
2.85
5.13
6.97
1.82
3.35
4. 28
6.61
Half
2.05
3.40
4. 79
6.83
1.87
3.59
4.65
5.81
1.97
3.67
4. 74
5.99
1. 79
3. 22
4.11
6.43
1.59
2.95
5.06
6.97
1. 77
3.27
4.13
6.43
Full
1.92
3.34
4.57
6.56
1.83
3.39
4.54
5.70
1.97
3.58
4.69
5.95
1.80
3.33
4.16
6.62
1.64
3.01
5.11
6.79
1.81
3.31
4.17
6.45
DESIGNED DISTANCES
Driv.
Cycle km
05 1.61
10 2.92
15 5.08
20 7.11
05 1.89
10 3.55
15 4.64
20 5.82
Truck
No.
28, 30
24
Alt.
25
Alt.
48
Desc.
D3
TT
A#l
TT
A#2
Driv.
Cycle
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
km
1.77
3.31
4. 28
6.48
1.75
3.58
5. 14
5.81
1.98
3.40
4. 78
6.55
-------
50
40
30
a,
20
10
160
120
Seconds
TRUCK 24 TTDIE 15 AVG. CYCLE
Half Payload
60
>0
V
40
30
A
0,
20
10
0
60
150 100
Seconds
TRUCK 25 TTDIE 15 AVG. CYCLE
Half Payload
FIGURE 10. DIESEL TRUCK DRIVING CYCLE TRACES
49
-------
V. DIESEL BUS RESULTS
Two diesel buses, one city (Bus 31) and one intercity (Bus 32),
were evaluated in this project. These evaluations included: road-load
determinations for setting dynamometer power; chassis version thirteen-
mode evaluations; and steady state, sinusoidal and driving cycle evalua-
tions. Results of these evaluations are given in Appendix E.
The nominal speeds, instrumentation and analysis used were the
same as used for the diesel trucks except for omission of the 88.51 km/
hr (55 SS) steady state and the 64.37 km/hr (40± 2) sinusoidal. The
driving cycles provided for the buses were also significantly different
in general appearance than those provided for the trucks. The designed
distance and actual distance traveled during operation of the driving
cycle on the chassis dynamometer are given in Table 10.
TABLE 10. DIESEL BUS DRIVING CYCLE DISTANCE
Bus Driving _ Distance, kilometers
Cycle
Empty
2. 53
4. 75
6.68
8. 06
2.51
4. 78
6.50
8.24
Half
2.35
4.72
6.76
7.81
2.44
4.86
7.07
8.23
Full
2.49
4.63
6.61
7.90
2.49
4.66
7.00
8. 06
31 05
10
15
20
32 05
10
15
20
Designed Distances
05 2.38
10 4.68
15 6.84
20 8.01
A major difficulty was encountered with the tires on the city bus.
To help remedy the situation, a complete set of high speed highway tires
had to be purchased. Other difficulties involved road-load power and
the capability of driving the cycles.
The differences in fuel flow (or rack setting) on the road for
empty, half and full loads were almost negligible. For example, going
from empty to full load changed the fuel flow less than ten percent.
This amount is only about two to three times the repeatability of a
determination for a single load condition. The road-load power settings
on the chassis dynamometer are given in Table 11.
51
-------
TABLE 11. DIESEL, BUS ROAD-LOAD POWER SETTING
ON THE CHASSIS DYNAMOMETER
Empty Half Full
Bus Make Desc. Load, kg kW Load, kg kW Load, kg kW
31 GMC City Bus 9,752 22.4 11,113 26.1 13, 601 31.3
32 MCI Intercity 9,752 23.9 11,113 26.1 13, 601 29.1
In order for the tires to survive on the dynamometer, it was
necessary to reduce the force against the dynamometer rolls (i.e. ,
support some of the weight of the bus by means other than the dyna-
mometer rolls). This was accomplished by raising the rear end of the
bus. Due to the air suspension system that is used on the buses,
however, it is difficult to consistently maintain the same amount of
force against the dynamometer rolls. Any difference in force against
the dynamometer rolls affects the total absorbed power versus vehicle
speed relationship (i. e. , friction power essentially varies as a direct
function of speed, whereas power set in the dynamometer varies as a
cubic function of the speed). Considerable effort was made to minimize
this factor.
The cycles had repeated sharp spikes which could not be attained
with either bus; primarily with Bus 31 (the city bus). Bus 31 had a two-
speed automatic transmission with free-wheeling during decelerations
in the low-speed range, and a lower power to weight ratio than Bus 32.
These driving cycles were used on the basis of having one second per
record as was the case with all the truck driving cycles. A portion of
a driving cycle is shown in Figure 11.
As the inertia load was increased, Bus 31 was less able to follow
the spikes of the driving cycles. In addition, as the driver became less
able to meet the spiked accelerations and decelerations, he apparently
tended to drive in a much smoother pattern. This factor appeared to be
the primary reason for the apparent inconsistency in the driving cycle
data for Bus 31. In addition, the friction horsepower to water-brake
dynamometer horsepower ratio may have had a minor effect. With
Bus 32, considerable effort was expended in arriving at a more
reasonable approach toward driving the cycles. First, a determination
was made to see how well the spikes could be followed. Second, based
on these results, an engineering decision was reached as to what would
be the best approach toward driving the cycles. Then, the driver was
trained to drive in that manner. Basically, those spikes which could
not possibly be attained were mentally smoothed over. The primary
effect of this approach was to eliminate the rapid throttle oscillations.
52
-------
40
30
A
OH
20
10
600
540
Seconds
BUS 31 DIESEL CITY BUS 15 AVG. CYCLE
Half Payload
600
540
Seconds
BUS 32 DIESEL INTERCITY BUS 1.5 AVG. CYCLE
Half Payload
FIGURE 11. DIESEL BUS DRIVING CYCLE TRACES
53
-------
This had minimal effect on the resulting driving traces and actually
resulted in somewhat better overall following of the cycles.
54
-------
VI. SUMMARY
The project and some of the primary findings are summarized
as follows:
Scope This project involved the determination of exhaust emissions
from 32 heavy-duty vehicles operating on chassis dynamometers,
Vehicles tested included: eighteen gasoline and twelve diesel
trucks with gross vehicle weights (GVW) ranging from 8,000
to 35, 000 kilograms and two diesel buses. These vehicles
were evaluated in the as-received condition.
Test Procedures - Inertia weights were selected to simulate an empty
vehicle, 50 percent payload, and full rated GVW. In the case
of truck-tractors, the empty weight included the weight of a
typical trailer. A road load power setting was then determined
experimentally on the road for each vehicle at each weight.
The vehicle was then installed onto the chassis dynamo-
meter for the exhaust emission determinations. All deter-
minations were made with the vehicle and dynamometer at
normal operating temperatures. Each vehicle was evaluated,
at three different inertia weights and appropriate road-load
power settings, over modes and cycles including: idle and
steady state speeds, acceleration-deceleration (in a sinusoidal
pattern) and driving cycles (to simulate urban and suburban
driving conditions). In four vehicles, the preceding modes
and driving cycles were repeated and additional driving cycles
were run. Chassis version nine-mode tests were conducted
on all gasoline vehicles and chassis version thirteen-mode
tests were conducted on all diesel vehicles.
For the gasoline vehicles, a constant volume sampling
(heavy-duty version) procedure was used to gather the emis-
sions. In addition to the emission measurements by the bag
technique, emission levels and associated operating parameters
were measured and recorded continuously. After the tests,
exhaust hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide measurements were
made at idle using a portable garage-type analyzer. The
continuous recorded emission levels were processed into
emission and fuel rates on an every second basis.
For the diesel vehicles, the emission in the raw exhaust,
along with air flow and associated operating parameters, were
measured and recorded continuously. These values were then
processed into emission and fuel rates on an every second
basis. Average emission rates for the cycle were determined
55
-------
for this second by second data. With some exceptions, the
emissions instrumentation and calculation procedures were
similar to those used in the thirteen-mode diesel certification
procedure.
Results - A large data base of exhaust emission and fuel rates, under
various simulated driving conditions, -were collected and
processed on 32 heavy-duty vehicles. This data is currently
undergoing analysis under a separate data analysis contract.
This project is also felt to have made a significant
contribution to the state-of-the-art relative to the operation of
high GVW vehicles on a chassis dynamometer. In addition,
the findings in this project have contributed to the study,
currently being made, of the application of the chemilumines-
cence instrument to the measurement of raw exhaust gases
from piston engines.
56
-------
LIST OF REFERENCES
1. Springer, Karl J. , "An Investigation of Emissions from Trucks
Above 6000-lb GVW Powered by Spark-Ignited Engines," Final
Report to the U. S. Public Health Service, under Contract PH
86-67-72, March 1969.
2. Springer, K. J. , Williams, G. L. , Olsen, R. W. , and Mills, K.
D. , "Emissions from Gasoline Powered Trucks Above 10, 000 -Ib
GVW Using PHS Proportional Sampling Techniques," AIChE Paper
No. 53C, presented at the Sixty-First Annual Meeting, Los Angeles,
California, December 1968.
3. Olsen, R. W. , and Springer, K. J. , "Exhaust Emissions from Heavy-
Duty Vehicles, " SAE Paper No. 690764, presented at the National
Combined Fuels and Lubricants and Transportation Meetings, Houston,
Texas, November 4-7, 1969.
4. Tyree, C. D. , and Springer, K. J. , "Studies of Emissions from Gaso-
line-Powered Vehicles Above 6,000-lb Gross Vehicle Weight," Final
Report to the National Air Pollution Control Administration under
Contract PH 86-67 72, July 1970.
5. Springer, K. J. , and Tyree, C. D. , "Exhaust Emissions from Gaso-
line Powered Vehicles Above 6,000-lb Gross Vehicle Weight," Final
Report to the Environmental Protection Agency under Contract EHS
70-110, April 1972.
6. Springer; Karl J. , "Baseline Characterization and Emissions Control
Technology Assessment of HD Gasoline Engines, " Final Report to the
Environmental Protection Agency under Contract EHS 70-110, Novem-
ber 1972.
7. Ingalls, Melvin N. , and Springer, Karl J. , "In Use Heavy Duty Gaso-
line Truck Emissions, Part I - Mass Emissions From Trucks Operated
Over a Road Course, " Final Report No. AR-974 to the Environmental
Protection Agency, under Contract EHS 70-113, February 1973.
8. Storment, John O. , and Springer, Karl J. , "A Surveillance Study
of Smoke From Heavy Duty Diesel-Powered Vehicles Southwestern
U. S. A. , " Final Report AR-909 to the Environmental Protection
Agency under Contract EHS70-109, June 1973.
9. Ingalls, Melvin N. , "Baseline Emissions on 6,000 to 14,000 Pounds
Gross Vehicle Weight Trucks, " Final Report AR-896 to the Environ-
mental Protection Agency under Contract 68-01-0467, June 1973.
57
-------
LIST OF REFERENCES (Cont'd)
10. Urban, Charles M. , Springer, Karl J. , "Emissions Control
Technology Assessment of Heavy Duty Vehicle Engines, "
Final Report No. EPA-460/3-74-007 to the Environmental
Protection Agency under Contract 68-03-0472, December 1973.
11. Ingalls, M. N. , and Springer, K. J. , "Mass Emissions from
Diesel Trucks Operated Over a Road Course, " Final Report
No. EPA-460/3-74-017 to the Environmental Protection Agency
under Contract 68-01-2113, August 1974.
12. Ingalls, M. N. , and Springer, K. J. , "Mass Emissions from Ten
Pre-Controlled Gasoline Trucks, and Comparisons Between Dif-
ferent Trucks on a Road Course, " Final Report No. EPA-460/3-
75-004 to the Environmental Protection Agency under Contract
68-03-0441, April 1975.
13. Federal Register, Vol. 37, No. 221, Environmental Protection
Agency, November 1972, with subsequent amendments.
14. Environmental Protection Agency, "Recommended Heavy Duty
Diesel Instrumentation and Test Procedures," July 10, 1975.
15. Environmental Protection Agency, "Recommended Heavy Duty
Gasoline Instrumentation and Test Procedures, July 11, 1975.
16. Hare, Charles T. , Springer, Karl J. , "Measurement of Diesel
Exhaust Emissions Using EMA Procedure, " Final Report on
Project 11-2814-01 to the Engine Manufacturers Association,
June 30, 1970.
17. Patterson and Henein, "Emissions from Combustion Engines
and Their Control," Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Inc., 1972.
18. Urban, Charles M. , and Springer, Karl J. , "13-Mode Diesel
Emissions Test Results on 12 Trucks, " Final Report on Pro-
ject 11-3782-003 to the Engine Manufacturers Association,
February 1976.
58
-------
APPENDIX A
GENERAL INFORMATION
A-l Composition of Fuels Used
A-2 Computer Tape Test Record
and Data Format
A-3 Examples of Test Data Computer
Output
-------
APPENDIX A-l
COMPOSITION OF FUELS USED
Fuel Type Type 2-D Type 1-D
Gasoline Diesel Fuel Diesel Fuel*
Fuel Code EM-234-F EM-238-F EM-226-F
Property
Gravity, 'API 57.4 36.1 44.3
RVP, Ibs 8.5
Sulfur, % by wt. 0.002 0.30 0.10
Distillation, °F
Initial Boiling Point
End Point
5%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
95%
Recovery, %
Residue, %
Loss, %
Paraffins, %
Olefins, %
Aromatics, %
Calculated Cetane No.
Viscosity, SU S, °F
Viscosity, CS, °F
Flash, °F
88
386
116
134
164
186
206
222
238
256
282
320
338
98.0
1.0
1.0
_
7.0
29. 0
-
-
-
_
380
659
400
416
432
450
469
496
519
543
566
600
636
99.0
1.0
0.0
_
-
28.5
49. 0
34.5
2.5
170
336
511
-
366
-
-
-
399
-
-
-
459
—
99.0
1.0
0.0
-
2.5
15.1
48.6
31.5
1.67
115
-Used only in Bus 31
A-2
-------
APPENDIX A-2. COMPUTER TAPE TEST RECORD AND DATA FORMAT
RECORD SHEET Column Format
Contractor Code (1 = SwRI) 1 II
Contract (01 = This Contract) 2-3 I 2
Truck Number (Sequential starting with 001) 4-6 I 3
Test Series Number (0 = No weight for 9-mode 7-8 I 2
1 = empty weight
2 = half payload
3 = rated GCW)
Test (0 = Standard 1 = Alternate Driving Cycles) 9 II
Run No. (1 = Standard 2 = Repeat) 10 II
Record Number (001 for this record) 11-13 I 3
Date of Test (Day, Day, Month, Month, Year, Year) 14-19 I 6
Model Year 20-21 I 2
Type of fuel (1 = gas 2 = diesel 3 = other) 22 I 1
GVW 23-27 I 5
No. of axles (see attached coding sheet) 28 II
Body style (see attached coding sheet) 29-30 I 2
Mileage 31-36 I 6
Usage of vehicle (see attached coding sheet) 37-38 I 2
Test Weight 39-44 I 5
Last Tune-up (Day, Day, Month, Month, Year, Year) 45-50 I 6
Tuned before test (1 = Yes, 2 = No) 51 II
Percent CO Idle 52-55 F 4. 1
PPM Hexane Idle 52-59 14
Engine serial number 60-75 A 16
Engine type (V-8, 1-6, etc.)
A-3
-------
APPENDIX A-2 (Cont'd.) COMPUTER TAPE TEST
RECORD AND DATA FORMAT
Manufacturer (see attached coding sheet)
Engine size (cubic inches)
Hp rating at rated RPM
Rated RPM
Carburetor barrels
Transmission (No. of gears)
Axle (No. of ratios)
Tire size
As received idle rpm
As received dwell
As received timing (+ = BTDC, - = ATDC)
Tuned idle RPM
Tuned dwell
Tuned timing
Column
79-80
81-83
84-86
87-90
91
92-93
94
95-102
103-106
107-108
109-111
112-115
116-117
118-120
Format
I 2
I 3
I 3
I 4
I 1
I 2
I 1
A 8
I 4
I 2
A 3
I 4
I 2
A 3
A-4
-------
APPENDIX A-2 (Cont'd.) COMPUTER TAPE TEST
RECORD AND DATA FORMAT
CODING SHEET
Code
1
2
3
No. of Axles
9
blank
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
blank
two axle truck
three axle truck
four axle combination
(2 axles on truck and
2 on full trailer)
three axle combination
four axle combination
(2 axles on tractor
and 2 on trailer)
four axle combination
(3 axles on tractor
and 1 on trailer)
five axle combination
(3 axles on tractor
and 2 on trailer)
six axle combination
(3 axles on tractor,
1 on trailer, and 2 on
full trailer)
Other
Not answered
Usage of Vehicle
Agriculture
Forestry
Mining
Construction
Manufacturing
Wholesale and/or Retail
For-hire
Personal transportation
Utilities
Services
Other
Not answered
Code
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
20
30
40
50
60
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Body Style
Pickup, panel, multi-stop, walk-in
Platform with added device
Other platform
Cattlerack
Insulated non-refrigerated van
Insulated refrigerated van
Furniture van
Open top van
All other enclosed vans
Beverage
Utility
Garbage or refuse
Winch or crane other than wrecker
Wrecker
Pole or logging
Auto transport
Dump truck or combination
Tank truck or combination (liquids)
Tank truck or combination (dry bulk)
Concrete mixer
Other
Manufacturer
Chevrolet
Ford
International Harvester
CMC
Dodge
Willis
Mack
White Series (Freightline, Reo, etc. )
Caterpillar
Cummins
Detroit Diesel
All others
A-5
-------
APPENDIX A-2. (Cont'd. ) COMPUTER TAPE TEST
RECORD AND DATA FORMAT
DATA FORMAT FOR ALL TESTS Column Format
Contractor Code (1 = SwRI) 1 II
Contract (01) 2-3 I 2
Truck Number (Sequential starting with 001) 4-6 I 3
Test Series Number (0 = nine-mode 7-8 I 2
1 = empty weight
2 = half pay load
3 = rated GCW)
Type of Test (1=9 mode FTP 9 I 1
4 = Steady State
5 = Experimental (Dr. Cy. )
6 = Other (Sinu. )
Test Number Series
Record Number (002 to OXX for each load)
HC, grams/min
CO, grams/min
COp, grams/min
NOX, grams/min
Fuel Consumption (See Note 1)
10
11-13
14-19
20-25
26-32
33-38
39-44
I 1
I 3
F6.2
F6. 1
F7. 1
F6.2
F6. 2
9-MODE OR 13-MODE FTP
No additions
STEADY STATE
Manifold Vacuum, " Hg; Rail Pressure, psi
or Rack, % 45-49 F5.
MPH 50-51 I 2
RPM ' 52-55 I 4
SINUSOIDAL
Period (Reciprocal of Frequency), Seconds 45-49 F5.1
MPH 50-51* I 2
Amplitude, mph 52-53 12
DRIVING CYCLE
Distance, miles 53-58 F6.2
Time, seconds 59-64 F6. 1
*-99 Inserted when test has data missing
Notes: 1. All Fuel Consumption in litre/100 km except idle in ml/min.
A-6
-------
APPENDIX A-2 (Cont'd.) COMPUTER TAPE TEST
RECORD AND DATA FORMAT
FORMAT COMPOSITE 7-i
Record Sheet: 00
9-Mode FTP:*
Bag Average 00
Modal Composite Avg. 00
Modal Values (Modes 1-9) °°
WOT Average
Record Sheet:
Steady State:
00
05
10
15
20
30
40
55
Sinusoidal:
20±5
30±5
40±5
20±2
30±2
40±2
Driving Cycle:
05 Avg.
10 Avg.
15 Avg.
20 Avg.
Alternate Driving Cycle:
As required
01, 02 & 03
II
11
11
II
11
11
1I
11
11
11
01, 02 & 03
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
5
5
11
1
0
0
1-9
7
1
2
3
4
4
6
1
2
3
4
1 to 4
11-13*
001
002*
003*
004-012*=
013**
001
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1 OC
2 OC
3 OC
4
5
6
7
8
)2
)3
)4
•n
0)
0)
1
0)
CO
002 to 005
*For 13 Mode Results on Buses 31 and 32: 002 = Composite Results in
g/bhp-hr, 003 = Composite Results in g/min
##004-016 (Column 10 goes from 1 to 9 then 0 to 3)
A-7
-------
APPENDIX A-2 (Cont'd.) COMPUTER TAPE TEST
RECORD AND DATA FORMAT
FORMAT FOR CONTINUOUS DATA TAPES
Character Format
NSWRI
KONTR
NOTRK
LOAD
ILTYP
ITSEQ
NREC
MODE
MPH
ISC
ARPM
AVAC
AMPH
AHC
AGO
AC02
ANOX
FUEL
ISC
ARPM
Contractor Code
Contract
Truck Number
Test Series Number
Type of Test
Test Number Series
Record Number
Mode
Average Speed (MPH)*
Time in Seconds
Engine RPM
Vacuum, "Hg; Rack, %; or Rail, psi
Vehicle speed in mph
HC in g/min
CO in g/min
CO? in g/min
NOX in g/min
Fuel in g/min
Time in Seconds
Engine RPM
1
2-3
4-6
7-8
9
10
11-13
14
15-16*
17-20
21-25
26-30
31-34
35-41
42-49
50-57
58-65
66-72
73-76
77-81
I 1
I 2
I 3
I 2
I 1
I 1
I 3
I 1
I 2
I 4
F5.
F5.
F4.
F7.
F8.
F8.
F8.
F7.
I 4
F5.
0
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
0
A-l
-------
APPENDIX A-2 (Cont'd.) COMPUTER TAPE TEST
RECORD AND DATA FORMAT
AVAC Manifold Vacuum or rack or rail position 82-86 F5. 1
AMPH Vehicle speed 87-90 F4. 1
AHC HC 91-97 F7. 2
AGO CO
ACO2 CO2
ANOX NOX
FUEL Fuel
98-105 F8.2
106-113 F8.1
114-121 F8.2
122-128 F7.1
-^Columns 15 and 16 are labeled as follows whenever the test data on the
tape is judged not useable as recorded on this tape or the values differ
from the composite bag data
Problem
Description
Data Not Useable
Data Differs
TIME
RPM
VAC, RACK OR RAIL
MPH
HC
CO
CO2 & FUEL
NOX
VARIOUS
TEST VOID
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
80
81
82
83
84
85
85
87
Data Not Useable - Serious problem(s), emissions differ from composite
values by more than 20%, MPH or RPM or VAC by
more than 10%, or TIME by more than 5%.
Data Differs - Emissions differ from composite values by 1 0 to 20% or
MPH or RPM by 5 to 10%.
A-9
-------
APPENDIX A-3. EXAMPLES OF TEST DATA COMPUTER OUTPUT
EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM TRUCKS
VEHICLE NUMBER 28
DATE 12/75
MODEL 1967 DODGE D3DIE
DRIVER JGC
WET BULB TEMP 14. C
SPEC. HUM. 8.2 GRAM/KG
TEST WT. 7258. KG
DRY BULB TEMP 18. C
BARO. 743.7 MM HG
11-4133
TEST NO. 81
ENGINE 12.18 LITRE 16
GVW 18824 KG
REL. HUM. 61.3 PCT
MEASURED..FUEL .00 KG
RUN DURATION
RUN DISTANCE
AVERAGE SPEED
AVG. AIR FLOW
HC GRAMS/MIN
CO GRAMS/MIN
C02 GRAMS/MIN
NOX GRAMS/MIN
250. SECONDS
2.266 KILOMETRES
32.63 KM/HOUR
12812. GRAMS/MINUTE
1.82
6.1
576.
4.84
4.17 MINUTES
1.408 MILES
20.28 MPH
HC GRAMS/KG OF FUEL 9.80
CO GRAMS/KG OF FUEL 32.7
C02 GRAMS/KG OF FUEL 3108.
NOX GRAMS/KG OF FUEL 26.12
HC GRAMS/KILOMETRE 3.34
CO GRAMS/KILOMETRE 11.2
C02 GRAMS/KILOMETRE 1060.
NOX GRAMS/KILOMETRE 8.91
C. B. FUEL CONSUMPTION 185.47 GPAMS/MIN
CARBON BALANCE FUEL CONSUMPTION 40.6 LITRE/100KM
ESTIMATED TOTAL FUEL WT. FROM CARBON BALANCE 772.81 GRAMS
A-10
-------
APPENDIX A-3. EXAMPLES OE TEST DATA COMPUTER OUTPUT
EXHAUST EMISSIONS FROM TRUCKS 11-4133
VEHICLE NUMBER 17
DATE b/20/75
MODEL 1175 IHC CAL
DRIVER EG
WET BULB TEMP g\, C
SPEC. HUM. 11.1 GRAM/KG
RUN DURATION
TIME 1330 MRS
00 STEADY STATE
TEST WT. 7711 KG
DRY BULB TEMP 21 C
BARO, 742,1 MM HG
TEST NO, U
ENGINE 5,bbLiTRE ve
GVW 7938 KG
REL, HUM. Hb,8 PCT
MEASURED FUEL o.oo
BLOWER
BLOWER
BLOWER
BLQVNER
BLOWER
INLET PRESS,
DIP. PRESS,
INLET TEMP,
REVOLUTIONS
cu. CM/REV
BAG RESULTS
HC
HC
CO
CO
C02
CO.?
NOx
NOX
SAMPLE
BACKGRD
SAMPLE
BACKGRD
SAMPLE
6 i C X G 3 D
SAMPLE
BACKGRD
HC GRAMS/KG
CO GRAMS/KG
CO? GRAMS/KG
NOX GHAMS/KG
OF FUEL
OF FUEL
OF FUEL
OF FUEL
2.00
355, b
508,0
35
3312
17707
MINUTES
MM
MM
DEG
H20
H20
C
METER
READINGS
5.0
8.5
2,2
1.5
I*. S
3,0
u.s
3,5
SCALE
1
1
3
3
3
3
1
1
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
COS CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS (GRAMS)
CO MASS (GRAMS)
COE MASS (GRAMS)
NO* MASS (GRAMS)
HC GRAMS/KILOMETRF
co GRAMS/KILOMETRE
CO? GRAMS/KILOMETRE
NOX GRAMS/KILOMETRE
13
18
,18
,8
.31
.08
R
R
R
R
b.Bb
11,1
3117
1,50
HC GRAMS/MIN
co GRAMS/MIN
C02 GRAMS/MIN
NOX GRAMS/MIN
,11
.5
TOTAL CARBON
ESTIMATED FUEL
CARBON BALANCE
ESTIMATED FUEL
ma.bl GRAMS
WT FROM CARBON BALANCE 5b.P1 GRAMS
FUEL CONSUMPTION FROM ROLL COUNTS
CONSUMPTION GRAMS/MIN E8,it
VALUE
25 PPM
PPM
PPM
PPM
PCT
PCT
PPM
PPM
13
5b
38
83
05
1
n
R LITRE/100KM
BLOWER TEST VOLUME
52, b* STO. CU. METERS
A-ll
-------
APPENDIX A-3. EXAMPLES OF TEST DATA COMPUTER OUTPUT
EXHAUST EMISSIONS FrtOM TRUCKS 11-4133
VEHICLE NUfiQEK 88
DATE L 2 / 7 S
MUOtL lHij>7 DUDGE
DKTVER AL HKH
wtF BULO FE'-iP 1H L
iSPF.C. HUH. 12.1 GKAM/KG
J30IE bS STtAOY STATE
UKY BULB
RUN DURATION
RUN DISTANCE
AVERAGE SPEED
AVG. AIK FLOW
HC GRAM3/ttIN
CU GRA.-iS/fllN
CU2 GRAHS/MIN
NOX
HC
120 SELDiNOS
S.Hbl KILOMETRES
88.85 KM/HOUR
llbSl GRAMS/MINUTE
1,58
1015
9,tO
FUEL
CU GRA-iS/KG OF FUEL
C 0
-------
APPENDIX B
DESCRIPTION OF VEHICLES AND DRIVING CYCLES
B-l Gasoline Trucks Evaluated
B-2 Diesel Vehicles Evaluated
B-3 Description of Driving Cycles
-------
APPENDIX B-l. GASOLINE TRUCKS EVALUATED
Engine
Truck
No.
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Year
1970
1974
1973
1975
1965
1974
1974
1967
1971
1974
1974
1972
1974
1969
1974
1966
1975
1975
Make
Dodge
Chev
Ford
IHC
Chev
Ford
IHC
Dodge
IHC
IHC
Chev
Ford
CMC
Ford
CMC
Chev
IHC Cal.
Ford Cal.
Body Style
Van
Van
Van
Van
Van
Van
Van
Van
Van (Refr. )
Tractor
Flatbed
Tractor
Tractor
Tractor
Dump Tr .
Dump Tr.
Van
Tractor
Desc.** Mileage
D2
D2
D2
D2
D2
D2
D2
D2
D3
TT2A
D3
TT2A
TT2A
TT2A
D3
D3
D2
TT2A
62, 486
3, 068
25,296
7, 214
5, 239
19, 002
13,559
48, 299
80, 000
8,644
17, 994
47,630
8,472
100, 000
10,945
100,000
4, 120
1,654
Application
Other
Rental
Rental
Rental
Delivery
Delivery
Delivery
Hauling
Meat Hauling
Rental
Construction
Rental
Rental
Delivery
Construction
Dirt Hauling
Rental
Leasing
GVW
16,
23,
23,
22,
19,
23,
23,
23,
40,
56,
38,
45,
45,
43,
44,
42,
17,
44,
500
000
000
500
500
160
660
000
000
000
500
000
000
500
500
000
500
000
Source
SwRI
Hertz
Hertz
ABC
Basse Truck Lines
Ryder
Ryder
Yellow Freight
L&tH Packing
ABC
de Leon & Sons
ABC
ABC
Royal Crown
Maldonado
Smitty's Trucking
California
California
CID
inches
318
366
361
345
292
391
392
361
345
478
366
477
427
391
427
366
345
389
Litr«
5. 22
b. 00
5.92
5. bb
4.79
fc.41
6,42
5.92
5.66
7. 83
6. 00
7. 82
7. 00
6.41
7.00
6. 00
5.66
6.38
**
-------
APPENDIX B-2. DIESEL VEHICLES EVALUATED
Engine
No.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Year
1972
1975
1973
1971
1972
1975
1975
1974
1972
1967
1975
1975
1972
1975
Make
Ford
Ford*
IH
Mack
IH
Ford
IH
Ford
IH
Dodge
IH
IH
CMC
MCI
Body Style
Van
Tractor
Tractor
Tractor
Tractor
Tractor
Tractor
Tractor
Tractor
Dump truck
Van
Refr. Van
Bus
MC Bus
Desc.**
D2
TT
TT
TT
TT
TT
TT
TT2A
TT
D3
D2
D3
Bus
Bus
Truck
Mileage
71, 500
1,856
174, 550
216, 022
132,391
12, 635
19,948
41,478
331, 372
1, 793
10, 154
27, 008
6, 850
Application
Rental
Leasing
Rental
Leasing
Rental
Leasing
Rental
Leasing
Leasing
Gravel
Hauling
Rental
Meat
transport
City bus
Intercity Bus
GVW
22, 000
76, 500
76, 000
76, 500
76, 500
76, 500
76, 500
49, 800
76, 500
41, 500
25, 160
47, 800
Source
ABC
Coast
Ryder
Wood
ABC
Red Mac
Ryder
Red Mac
R&K
Bailey
ABC
Roegelein
S. A. Transit
S. A. Transit
Make
Cat.
Cummins
Cummins
Mack
D. D.
D. D.
Cummins
D. D.
Cummins
Cummins
Cat.
D. D.
D.D.
D. D.
Model
1150
NTCC-350
NTC-290R
ENDT-675
8V-71N
8V-71N
NTC-290R
6L-71N
V8-903
NH-220
3208
6V-53N '
6V-71N
8V-71N
Serial
No.
96B8174
10495890
10335631
5U1076
8VA178757
8VA302505
10472968
6A0290231
10226499***
3 cq ***
40S11191
06D121342
3T65111
8VA326961
Date
of Mfg.
7-72
5-75
4-73
9-70
4-72
9-74
12-74
10-73
-
3-75
2-75
8-71
7-75
*Meets California Emission Requirements.
**D2 - Single unit truck - 2 axles
D3 --Tandem axle single unit truck - 3 axles
TT2A - Tractor and trailer - 3 axles total
TT - Tandem axle tractor and trailer - 5 axles total
***Da|.e and serial number are questionable.
-------
APPENDIX B-3
DESCRIPTION OF DRIVING CYCLES
Vehicle
No. Desc.
1-8, 17, D2GAS
17 Repeat
17 Alt. D2GAS
ALTERNATE
09, 11, D3GAS
15, 16
10, 12, TTGAS
13, 14,
18,
18 Repeat
18 TTGAS
Alt. ALTERNATE
19, 29 D2DIE
28, 30 D3DIE
20, 21, TTDIE
22, 23
24, 24 Repeat
25, 25 Repeat
26, 27
24 Alt. TTDIE
ALTERNATE
#1
25 TTDIE
Alt. ALTERNATE
#2
31, 32 BUS DIE
Desc.
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
05
10
15
20
Number
180622075
925077131
1874219417
1638863867
1162034257
334486913
2012212305
1674619155
1245377313
532860011
1566793097
400624235
1031942939
2058474153
2109872435
380668241
310823643
1718373307
1204338883
1188064411
390741665
1527266763
1137788723
555005187
882238513
202042971
743630625
1200794289
767793819
802433547
605752003
462050771
1624531969
2112632739
201419497
999014859
1640346049
1143551683
1790747657
51384161
2110306831
439674415
2145058671
1263137477
Duration,
seconds
576
580
603
637
651
590
611
601
714
623
644
736
111
656
727
753
699
676
786
745
652
675
779
772
791
761
641
734
827
776
697
669
824
782
749
668
829
775
708
749
1055
1050
1023
931
Avg. Speed,
km/hr
8. 50
16. 53
24.67
33. 63
7.65
15.86
24. 23
33. 30
8.24
16. 11
24. 01
31.78
8. 23
16. 79
24. 01
32.78
7.85
16.65
23. 67
31. 39
8. 91
15. 56
23. 51
33. 17
8.04
15.65
24.09
31.82
8.22
16. 50
24. 00
31.32
7.63
16.49
24.75
31. 34
8.62
15.83
24. 33
31. 52
8. 18
16. 01
23.99
31. 00
B-4
-------
APPENDIX C
GASOLINE TRUCK RESULTS
C-l through C-18 Summarized Results of Eighteen
Gasoline Trucks
C-19 Gasoline Truck Idle CO and HC
C-20 Modified Nine-Mode FTP Results Summary
C-21 Modal Modified Nine-Mode FTP Results
-------
o
APPENDIX C-l
TABLE 01-1. TRUCK 001 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
1970 Dodge DZGAS 5. 21 Litre V8 GVW 7484 KG Project 1 1-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±5
20±2
30±2
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD - 3401 KG
HC
1. 13
0.28
0.66
1.20
0.86
0.86
1.04
11.54
4.27
2.28
2.90
1.68
2.39
10.74
11.84
5.93
6. 10
CO
12.3
5.3
3.5
4.6
2.4
3.3
20.3
46.6
31.6
35.7
27.8
20. 0
32.4
133.7
148.2
77.5
98.6
£02
2594
1202
699
656
452
533
691
594
424
534
606
389
519
852
652
574
585
NOX
2.48
1.27
0. 74
1.98
3.88
6.39
6.31
4.97
3.03
5.41
4. 04
3.58
7.22
2.70
3.22
4.84
4.38
Fuel*
110.59
51. 19
29.86
28. 17
19.36
22.87
30.70
29.75
20.57
24.91
27.51
18.01
24. 10
46.31
38.96
30.20
32. 08
HALF LOAD - 5261 KG
HC
1. 10
0. 46
0.99
0.64
0.97
0.95
1. 15
14.95
7.62
2.73
5.95
2.05
2.40
10.43
13.96
6.73
7.03
CO
12.6
8.5
5.7
4. 7
3.8
4. 3
23.4
58.4
53.3
43.6
36.5
26.8
39.8
140.7
199.6
102.0
166.2
C02
2261
1210
706
639
478
534
710
604
422
544
538
423
505
839
703
604
622
NOX
2.07
1.30
0.71
1.58
3.73
5.90
5.72
5.43
2.91
4.40
4.30
4.20
7.05
3.46
3.89
4.63
3.86
Fuel*
96.52
51.75
30.36
27.40
20. 57
22.97
31. 72
31.41
22.38
26. 24
25.62
19.69
23.98
45. 60
44.27
32.76
37.76
FULL LOAD - 7348 KG
HC
0. 76
0.39
0.79
0. 64
1. 03
0.86
1.95
14.48
7.42
1.75
6.55
2. 13
2.82
12.20
13.42
8.06
7.30
CO
12.9
6.5
4.3
4.2
3. 1
4. 1
74.3
65.3
65.8
50.4
35.9
28.7
75.2
128. 1
153. 7
86.5
119.0
C02
2394
1214
715
669
490
611
659
717
476
546
519
430
547
1094
803
684
673
NOX
2. 19
1. 23
0. 81
2. 16
4. 00
7.74
4. 53
7.76
4.76
5.74
3.53
3.42
5.32
4. 07
4.81
5.80
4.98
Fuel*
102. 12
51.77
30.59
28.65
21. 04
26.21
33.03
36.56
25.48
26.67
24.89
20.09
28. 13
56.37
45.95
35.74
37.34
*Fuel Consumption in Litre /100 km
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
o
TABLE 01-2.
1970 Dodge D2GAS
APPENDIX C-l (Cont'd. )
TRUCK 001 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
5.21 Litre V8 GVW 7484 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±5
20±2
30±2
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY LOAD - 3401 KG
HC
0. 84
0. 15
0.08
0. 26
0. 64
0. 70
0. 92
1. 53
5. 98
3.34
2. 40
1. 54
1.33
2. 50
1. 49
3.21
2.37
3. 26
CO
13. 1
1.7
1.4
1.4
2. 5
1.9
3. 5
29. 8
24. 2
24.7
37. 6
14. 8
15.8
33.9
18. 6
40. 3
31.0
52.6
CO2
71
356
319
280
352
365
572
1012
308
332
562
322
306
542
118
177
230
312
NOX
0.02
0.34
0.34
0.30
1.07
3. 14
6.85
9. 24
2.58
2.37
5.69
2. 14
2.82
7. 54
0.37
0.87
1. 94
2.34
Fuel*
29. 61
113.30
101.38
89.39
113.07
116.94
183. 15
335.75
115. 17
120. 21
195.82
108.99
105. 82
187. 95
48.03
79.00
90.20
127.87
HC
1.08
0. 15
0. 12
0.40
0.35
0. 78
1. 02
1.69
7.97
6.07
2.88
3. 18
1. 63
2.52
1.45
3. 74
2. 71
3.81
3.34
3.28
6.56
5.91
HALF LOAD -
CO
7. 1
1. 7
2.3
2. 3
2. 6
3. 1
4. 7
34.4
31. 1
42.4
46. 0
19.4
21. 3
41. 8
19.5
53.5
41. 0
90. 2
33. 1
33. 2
248. 1
237.6
C02
75
310
325
283
346
385
573
1045
322
335
575
287
336
530
117
188
243
337
324
329
828
823
5261 KG
NOy
0.05
0.28
0.35
0. 28
0.86
3.01
6.33
8.42
2.90
2.32
4.65
2.29
3.33
7.39
0.48
1.04
1.86
2.09
3.32
2.96
2.84
2.66
Fuel*
28.35
98. 89
103. 71
90. 87
110.79
123. 68
184. 14
348.35
124. 98
132. 89
207.01
102. 01
116.57
187.86
47. 31
88. 57
98.30
152.99
121.95
123.40
390.98
383. 22
FULL LOAD - 7348 KG
HC
0.97
0. 10
0. 10
0.32
0.35
0. 83
0.91
3. 01
7.73
5.97
1.88
3.52
1.71
3.03
1.72
3.70
3.37
4.08
CO
18.2
1. 8
1. 7
1. 7
2.3
2.5
4. 3
114. 3
34.9
52.9
54. 1
19.3
23. 1
80. 9
18.0
42.4
36. 1
66.5
CO2
76
327
322
287
361
394
647
1014
383
383
586
279
347
589
154
222
286
376
NOX
0. 02
0.30
0. 33
0. 33
1. 17
3. 21
8. 20
6.97
4. 14
3. 83
6. 15
1.90
2.76
5.73
0. 57
1. 33
2.42
2.78
, Fuel*
33.85
104.27
102.53
91.65
115.31
126.26
207.27
379.46
145.77
152.98
213.48
99.92
121. 00
225.87
59.24
94. 63
111.45
155.80
*Fuel Consumption in Grams /Minute
9-FTP - Nine-Mode Federal Test Procedure
9-WOT - Wide Open Throttle at 2000 RPM
-------
n
APPENDIX C-l (Cont'd.)
TABLE 01-3. TRUCK 001 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1970 Dodge DZGAS 5. Zl Litre V8 GVW 7484 KG Project 11-4 133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±5
20±2
30±2
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY
HC
28.43
1.36
0.74
2. 94
5. 68
5.94
5.02
4.56
51.95
27.78
12.27
14. 12
12.52
13.31
31.05
40.69
26.28
25.48
LOAD
CO
441. 8
14.9
14.0
15. 6
21.8
16.4
19.2
88.7
209.7
205.8
191.8
135. 5
149.0
180. 2
386.6
509.5
343. 6
411.6
- 3401
C02
2385
3142
3145
3136
3117
3125
3123
3016
2675
2758
2871
2953
2896
2885
2463
2240
2546
2442
KG
NOX
0. 55
3.01
3.31
3.33
9.43
26. 86
37.41
27. 52
22.39
19.74
29.07
19. 67
26.63
40. 12
7. 80
11.05
21.47
18.29
HALF
HC
37.99
1.53
1.20
4.38
3. 12
6.30
5.53
4.84
63.74
45. 64
13.93
31. 13
13.95
13.40
30.63
42.23
27.53
24.93
27.41
26.62
16.77
15.42
LOAD -
CO
250. 5
17.4
22.0
25.0
23. 1
24.9
25. 3
98. 6
248.8
319.0
222.3
190.7
182.5
222.5
413. 1
603. 8
417. 2
589.5
271. 1
268.9
634.7
620.0
5261 KG
coz
2655
3137
3131
3116
3123
3110
3112
2999
2576
2524
2776
2812
2880
2819
2464
2127
2467
2205
2657
2662
2119
2146
NOX
1. 66
2.87
3.36
3. 13
7.72
24.31
34.37
24. 17
23. 17
17.45
22.44
22.49
28.56
39.36
10. 17
11.78
18.93
13.68
27.21
24.02
7.25
6.94
FULL
HC
28.79
1. 00
1. 00
3.47
3.01
6.57
4. 39
7.93
53.04
39.00
8.81
35.22
14. 17
13.42
28.98
39. 11
30. 20
26.20
LOAD
CO
538. 5
16.9
16.9
18.7
19.6
20.0
20.9
301.2
239.4
345.6
253.2
193. 1
191.3
358. 1
304.3
448. 1
324.0
427.0
- 7348 KG
C02
2232
3140
3140
3129
3129
3117
3123
2671
2625
2503
2744
2795
2865
2606
2599
2341
2565
2415
NOX
0. 67
2.87
3. 19
3. 55
10. 11
25.44
39.54
18.36
28.42
25.03
28.81
18.97
22.81
25.35
9.68
14.03
21.72
17.86
-------
APPENDIX C-l (Cont'd. )
TABLE 01-4. TRUCK 001 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
1970 Dodge D2GAS 5. 21 Litre V8 GVW 7484 KG Project 1 1-4 133
EMPTY LOAD-3401 KG
HALF LOAD-5261 KG
FULL LOAD - 7348 KG
O
Ul
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±5
20±2
30±2
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
Test Man.
No. RPM Vac.
71 750 20.8
72 2275 19.0
73 2300 18.8
74 1700 18.2
75 2300 18.3
76 2075 16.3
77 2700 13.8
78 3700 7.8
Period
81 18.0
82 32.0
83 52.0
84 18.0
85 32.0
86 52.0
91
92
93
94
Test Man.
No. RPM Vac.
41 700 21.0
42 2325 19.3
43 2350 19.0
44 1725 18.0
45 2300 18.2
46 2075 15.7
47 2700 13.0
48 3700 7.2
Period
51 18.0
52 32.0
53 52.0
54 18.0
55 32.0
56 52.0
61
62
63
64
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
21
22
23
24
25
26
31
32
33
34
Man.
RPM Vac.
750 20. 8
2325 19.1
2350 18.9
1725 18.0
2275 17.5
2025 15.5
2700 11.3
3700 5.5
Period
18. 0
32. 0
52. 0
18.0
32.0
52. 0
-------
APPENDIX C-2
TABLE 02-1. TRUCK 002 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
1974 Chevrolet D2GAS 6. 00 Litre V-8 GVW 10433 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
0 20±5
er- 30±5
40±5
20±2
30±Z
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
4.74
2.81
2.34
2.22
2.48
2.81
2.80
11.44
3.59
2.37
2.95
1.96
2.31
17. 15
12.57
8. 17
6.30
CO
196.7
111.6
87.7
69.9
73.4
64.0
46.3
104.7
66.6
54.5
96.9
59.3
57.3
348. 2
212. 1
133.8
116.0
co2
2075
1230
728
795
593
642
834
739
511
559
677
535
564
1260
991
733
811
5533 KG
NOX
1.58
1.40
0.86
1. 78
2. 40
4.97
10.38
4.92
3. 13
4.05
2. 05
2.00
3.74
3. 55
5.87
6.19
7.92
Fuel*
101.37
59.78
36.91
38.53
30. 26
31. 74
38.71
39. 71
26.49
27.56
35.42
26. 80
27.94
78. 67
57.64
40.94
42. 83
HALF LOAD -
HC
6. 14
3.56
2.66
2. 17
2.47
2,85
3. 24
15.93
5. 13
3. 02
7.07
2.50
2.87
13.93
12. 85
7. 57
7.61
CO
264. 5
153.0
111.8
68.0
73.0
63.7
60. 4
128.8
92.3
81.4
117. 1
72. 1
69. 1
305. 2
224. 1
140.5
127.7
co2
2053
1147
714
772
559
624
818
777
550
613
673
544
597
1361
1127
764
818
7257 KG
NOX
1,40
1.00
0. 67
1.58
1. 94
4.51
9. 68
5. 11
3. 19
4. 41
2.49
2.31
4.46
2.92
6.75
5.48
6.88
Fuel*
105.14
59. 12
37,96
37.42
28.79
31.00
39.00
43.52
30.05
31.70
37. 17
28. 10
30. 20
79.65
64.25
42.61
44.08
FULL LOAD - 9071 KG
HC
5. 09
2.44
2.60
2.57
2.78
3.09
3. 82
15.57
8. 12
3.66
7.69
2.74
3. 23
18.31
18.54
10.32
9.57
CO
225. 0
98.5
79.7
74.0
84.3
63.5
84. 5
138.2
87.9
109.0
104.3
73.0
72.5
333.2
301.0
164.3
202.7
C02
2131
1230
770
811
638
700
878
807
500
639
730
586
672
1448
1170
832
898
NOX
1. 09
1. 13
0.90
1.51
2. 08
4.95
7, 89
6.89
3.73
5.07
4.08
3.44
6. 05
5. 55
6.93
5.69
6.83
Fuel*
105. 66
58. 84
38. 18
39.53
32.92
34. 19
43. 24
45.36
28.07
34.74
38.81
29.99
33. 64
85.79
71.92
47.44
52.69
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
o
APPENDIX C-2 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 02-2. TRUCK 002 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1974 Chevrolet D2GAS 6. 00 Litre V-8 GVW 10433 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±5
20±2
30±2
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY
HC
3.07
0. 63
0. 76
0.94
1. 19
1.99
3.02
4. 14
6. 10
2.90
2. 54
1.61
1.57
2.46
2.45
3.43
3. 41
3.43
CO
50.3
26.3
30.0
35.4
37.6
59. 1
68.8
68. 5
55.8
53.8
58.4
52.7
47.3
61.2
49.7
57.8
55.8
63. 2
LOAD
C02
82
277
331
294
427
477
689
1234
394
412
599
368
427
601
180
270
306
442
- 5533
NOX
0. 03
0. 21
0. 37
0.35
0.96
1.93
5. 34
15, 36
2. 62
2.53
4. 34
1. 11
1.60
3.99
0.51
1. 60
2. 58
4.31
KG
HALF LOAD - 7257 KG
Fuel*
53.
101.
119.
111.
154.
181.
254.
427.
158.
159.
220.
143.
159.
222.
83.
117.
127.
174.
82
07
91
13
71
94
58
60
10
71
48
79
70
55
76
26
51
08
HC
4. 09
0.82
0.96
1. 07
1. 16
1.99
3.06
4. 78
8.59
4. 14
3. 24
3.80
2.02
3. 09
2.00
3.51
3. 11
4. 10
4.47
4. 18
10. 16
8.44
CO
54.7
35.3
41. 1
45. 0
36.5
58.8
68.4
89.3
69. 4
74.4
87.6
63.0
58. 2
74.3
43.8
61.2
57.6
68.7
52.0
52. 0
421. 1
380.7
C02
82
274
308
288
415
450
670
1207
419
443
659
362
438
642
195
308
313
440
422
415
1074
927
NOX
0. 02
0. 19
0. 27
0. 27
0.85
1.56
4. 84
14. 30
2. 75
2. 57
4. 74
1. 34
1.86
4.79
0.42
1.84
2. 25
3.70
3. 02
3. 19
1.99
2. 23
Fuel*
57.
104.
118.
114.
150.
173.
248.
429.
175.
180.
254.
149.
169.
242.
85.
130.
130.
177.
163.
161.
557.
489.
04
83
61
21
11
10
30
93
09
97
58
18
20
54
33
97
49
02
43
05
96
68
FULL LOAD - 9071 KG
HC
2.32
0.68
0. 65
1. 05
1.38
2. 24
3.32
5. 64
8. 60
6.61
3.90
4. 22
2. 21
3.55
2. 72
5. 16
4.32
5. 18
CO
45.4
30. 0
26.4
32. 2
39. 8
68. 0
68. 2
124. 8
76.3
71.6
115. 9
57. 2
59.0
79. 8
49.4
83. 7
68. 8
109. 8
C02
109
284
330
311
436
514
751
1298
445
408
680
401
474
739
215
325
348
486
NOX
0. 03
0. 15
0. 30
0. 36
0.81
1.68
5.31
11. 66
3. 80
3. 04
5.39
2. 24
2.78
6.65
0. 82
1.93
2.38
3. 70
Fuel*
59.31
105. 25
117. 72
114.97
158.77
198.22
274. 14
476.92
186.98
170.75
275. 88
159. 11
180.99
276.22
95. 04
149.37
148. 25
213. 11
*Fuel Consumption in Grams/Minute
,9-FTP - Nine-Mode Federal Test Procedure
\9-WOT - Wide Open Throttle at 2000 RPM
-------
APPENDIX C-2 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 02-3. TRUCK 002 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1974 Chevrolet D2GAS 6. 00 Litre V-8 GVW 10433 KG Project 11-4133
Tf-st
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
o 30±5
40±5
oo
20±2
30±2
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY LOAD - 5533 KG
HC
56.97
6.26
6. 30
8.48
7. 72
10.96
11.86
9.69
38.59
18. 15
11.51
11. 17
9.80
11.07
29.20
29.21
26.72
19.70
CO
934.4
259.9
250. 1
318.4
243. 1
324. 8
270. 1
160. 1
353. 1
336. 7
264. 8
366.2
296. 2
274. 9
592.9
493.0
437. 7
362.8
C02
1521
2741
2756
2642
2763
2624
2707
2887
2492
2583
2717
2559
2673
2702
2145
2302
2397
2537
NOX
0. 60
2. 09
3. 13
3. 11
6. 19
10. 62
20.98
35.93
16. 60
15. 85
19.70
7. 74
10.01
17.95
6.04
13.63
20. 25
24. 75
HALF LOAD
HC
71.65
7.82
8.06
9.40
7.76
11.48
12.33
11. 11
49.03
22.88
12.74
25.47
11.91
12.75
23.43
26.79
23.80
23. 13
27.35
25.96
18.20
17.23
CO
959.8
336.9
346.6
394.4
243. 5
339.4
275.3
207.6
396.4
411. 3
344. 0
422.0
343.8
306.4
513. 2
467. 2
441. 5
388.0
317.9
323. 1
754. 8
777.4
- 7257 KG
C02
1434
2615
2599
2520
2762
2600
2698
2808
2391
2451
2588
2426
2591
2648
2289
2350
2400
2486
2583
2579
1926
1893
NOX
0.37
1.79
2.27
2.36
5.64
9.03
19.50
33.25
15.71
14. 21
18.63
8.98
11.02
19.77
4.92
14.08
17.22
20.90
18.51
19.82
3.58
4.56
FULL LOAD -
HC
39. 17
6.45
5. 55
9. 14
8. 72
11.33
12. 10
11.83
45.97
38.72
14. 12
26.53
12.22
12. 86
28.59
34. 53
29. 13
24.32
CO
765. 7
285. 2
224. 2
279.8
250. 6
342.9
248.8
261.6
408. 1
419. 6
420. 1
359.8
326. 1
288.8
520.2
560. 6
463.8
515. 2
. 9071 KG
C02
1842
2701
2800
2701
2748
2595
2740
2721
2383
2387
2464
2520
2618
2675
2261
2179
2348
2283
NOX
0. 12
1.39
2. 57
3. 16
5. 12
8.48
19.38
24.44
20.34
17.79
19.55
14.09
15.36
24.09
8.67
12.91
16. 06
17.37
-------
APPENDIX C-2 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 02-4. TRUCK 002 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
1974 Chevrolet D2GAS 6.00 Litre V-8 GVW 10433 KG Project 11-4133
O
EMPTY LOAD - 5533 KG
HALF LOAD - 7257 KG
FULL LOAD - 9071 KG
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
RPM
680
1800
1950
1600
2150
2000
2250
3175
Man.
Vac.
16. 0
18. 4
18.0
17. 1
16.6
14. 0
12. 1
8.0
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
RPM
800
1800
1900
1600
2150
2000
2250
3150
Man.
Vac.
17. 0
18. 3
17. 8
16.5
16. 8
13.8
11.6
8.0
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
RPM
800
1800
1900
1600
2150
2000
2250
3150
Man.
Vac.
17. 3
18.3
17.0
16. 0
16.5
13. 0
10. 7
7. 0
Period
Period
Period
20±5
30±5
40±5
20±2
30±2
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
81
82
83
84
85
86
91
92
93
94
18. 0
38.0
60. 0
18.0
38.0
60. 0
51
52
53
54
55
56
61
62
63
64
18. 0
38. 0
60.0
18.0
38. 0
60.0
21
22
23
24
25
26
31
32
33
34
18. 0
38. 0
60.0
18. 0
38. 0
60. 0
-------
APPENDIX C-3
TABLE 03-1. TRUCK 003 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
1973 Ford D2GAS 5. 92 Litre V-8 GVW 10433 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
0 30±5
,L 40±5
0 20±2
30±2
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD - 5397 KG
HC
3.28
2. 68
1.83
2. 27
2. 19
2.27
2.07
11. 23
3. 04
2.25
3. 08
2.35
2.09
12.87
12. 60
7.41
6.47
CO
50.9
52. 2
27. 8
35.9
32. 1
28.8
24. 8
71. 7
37.8
27. 7
68.9
42. 7
31. 2
229.7
173. 1
92.6
94. 6
C02
2208
1468
785
846
636
583
706
857
665
603
804
618
505
1346
989
804
758
NOX
4.32
4.97
2. 54
5. 11
6. 02
7. 20
12.75
10.73
8. 59
8.33
5. 83
6. 09
6.61
7. 75
8.09
8. 02
8.89
Fuel*
97. 13
65.86
35. 27
38.43
29. 29
26.87
31. 78
42.46
31. 03
27. 60
38.94
29.27
23. 68
73.86
54.96
41. 10
39.20
HALF LOAD - 7257 KG
HC
3.63
2.72
1.85
2.53
2. 51
2.48
1.91
12. 24
5.39
2.06
3.32
1.98
1.83
14.85
15. 18
7.94
7. 75
CO
51.0
51.6
28. 1
35. 5
36.5
32. 1
23.7
64. 6
38.6
26.5
54. 7
33.8
23. 0
226. 7
186.5
122.9
119.3
CO2
2230
1448
798
854
655
614
761
963
672
634
775
621
530
1322
1048
866
877
NOy
5.08
5.62
3. 10
6. 14
7.61
8.37
13.51
15. 02
9.68
9.21
7. 04
6.70
7.94
8.01
9.05
8.42
9.88
Fuel*
98. 11
64.97
35.85
38.77
30.45
28.43
33.98
46.63
31. 67
28. 84
36.84
28. 74
24. 15
72.91
58. 70
45. 81
46. 01
FULL LOAD - 9071 KG
HC
3.71
2.74
1.78
2.35
2.43
2.47
1.85
13.63
7.47
2.94
3.93
2. 12
2. 03
15.51
16.67
8.52
9.49
CO
68.8
54.7
29.3
45.3
37. 1
29.7
21.9
66.5
89.2
68.8
60. 5
32.2
25.0
246. 5
229. 1
107.0
155. 1
CO2
2249
1466
818
868
674
654
822
1018
721
671
814
643
592
1371
1098
879
854
NOX
4.33
4. 80
2. 62
5.37
6.78
9.34
18.26
15.60
8.24
7.89
7. 64
7.65
9.39
9.43
8.99
9.27
8.82
Fuel*
100. 10
65.96
36. 75
39.98
31. 25.
29.92
36.43
49. 28
37. 38
33.33
38.92
29. 62
26.93
76.38
63.84
45.39
47.68
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
o
APPENDIX C-3 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 03-2. TRUCK 003 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1973 Ford D2GAS 5.92 Litre V-8 GVW 10433 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±5
20±2
30±2
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
0.79
0.44
0. 72
0. 74
1. 22
1.77
2.44
3.07
6. 03
2.45
2.42
1. 66
1.89
2.24
1.80
3.44
3. 08
3.57
CO
20. 6
6.8
14. 0
11. 2
19.3
25.9
30.9
36.7
38.5
30. 5
29.8
37. 1
34.5
33.6
32. 1
47.2
38.5
52.2
C02
86
297
394
316
455
513
628
1045
460
537
648
432
499
542
118
270
334
418
5397 KG
NOX
0. 01
0. 58
1.34
1. 02
2.75
4. 85
7. 75
18. 86
5. 77
6.93
8.96
3. 14
4. 91
7. 10
1. 08
2.21
3. 34
4. 91
Fuel*
38. 20
97.43
132. 12
106. 12
154. 20
176.40
215.82
350. 90
170.30
187. 03
221. 69
156.48
176. 29
190. 03
76. 95
111.96
127. 72
161.47
HALF LOAD - 7257 KG
HC
0.77
0. 49
0. 73
0. 75
1.36
2.02
2.67
2. 82
6.59
4. 34
2. 21
1.78
1. 60
1.97
2.09
4. 13
3.27
4. 19
3.00
3. 12
7. 12
7.51
CO
19.4
6.9
13.9
11.3
19. 1
29.4
34. 5
35. 0
34.8
31. 1
28. 5
29.4
27. 2
24. 8
32.0
50.8
50. 6
64.6
24.4
24. 2
307.8
278.3
C02
82
300
389
322
459
529
661
1124
518
541
683
417
500
570
186
285
356
474
386
379
842
854
NOX
0, 02
0.68
1. 51
1. 25
3. 30
6. 14
9. 00
19.97
8.09
7. 80
9.92
3.79
5.40
8.55
1. 13
2.46
3.47
5.35
4. 13
4.32
2.27
2.96
Fuel*
36. 29
98.48
130.40
107.96
155. 75
183.43
228.35
374. 89
187.39
190.53
231. 79
147. 93
172. 94
194. 12
76.75
119.34
140. 76
185.92
137. 03
134.54
425.48
415. 10
HC
0.92
0. 50
0. 74
0. 72
1. 26
1.96
2.66
2.74
7.33
6. 03
3. 16
2. 10
1. 71
2. 18
2. 22
4. 57
3. 51
5. 14
FULL LOAD -
CO
27. 2
9.2
14. 7
11. 8
24. 4
29.9
31.9
32. 4
35. 8
72. 0
74. 0
32. 3
26. 0
26.9
35.3
62. 8
44. 0
84. 0
C02
77
302
394
330
467
543
703
1216
548
582
722
435
519
636
196
301
361
463
9071 KG
NOX
0. 00
0. 58
1.29
1.06
2. 89
5.47
10.05
27. 01
8.39
6. 65
8.49
4. 08
6. 17
10.09
1.35
2.46
3. 81
4.78
Fuel*
38. 83
100.48
132.36
110.68
160. 54
188. 24
240. 22
402.47
197.97
225.33
267.67
155.33
178. 52
216. 27
81.64
130.57
139.37
192. 90
*Fuel Consumption in Grams /Minute
'9-FTP - Nine-Mode Federal Test Procedure
9-WOT - Wide Open Throttle at 2000 RPM
-------
n
APPENDIX C-3 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 03-3. TRUCK 003 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1973 Ford D2GAS 5. 92 Litre V-8 GVW 10433 KG Project 11-4133
Test
De sc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±5
20±2
30±2
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY LOAD - 5397 KG
HC
20.76
4.52
5.45
6.94
7.92
10.02
11.32
8.74
35.42
13. 12
10.90
10.59
10.75
11.81
23.34
30.71
24. 14
22. 11
CO
538.4
70. 2
106. 1
105. 5
125. 0
146.9
143. 3
104. 5
226. 2
163. 0
134. 2
236.9
195. 6
176.7
416. 5
421.8
301. 7
323. 2
C02
2258
3045
2985
2982
2948
2907
2908
2978
2702
2872
2924
2764
2828
2854
2441
2409
2619
2591
NOX
0.37
5.96
10. 11
9.65
17. 83
27. 51
35.92
53. 74
33.86
37. 06
40.43
20. 05
27. 87
37.39
14. 05
19. 73
26. 12
30.39
HALF LOAD
HC
21. 13
4.95
5.62
6.92
8.75
11.02
11.69
7.53
35. 15
22.79
9.55
12.05
9.23
10. 15
27.28
34.64
23.23
22.55
21.90
23. 18
16.73
18.09
CO
535. 2
69.6
106. 5
105.0
122. 5
160.4
151. 2
93.3
185.6
163. 3
122.9
199.0
157.4
127. 5
416.5
425. 6
359. 5
347.3
178. 3
179.7
723.4
670.5
- 7257 KG
C02
2261
3044
2984
2982
2949
2882
2895
2999
2766
2840
2946
2819
2893
2937
2428
2391
2531
2552
2820
2814
1980
2058
NOX
0.50
6.93
11. 59
11. 57
21. 22
33.45
39.41
53. 27
43. 15
40.93
42.79
25. 60
31. 20
44. 02
14.72
20. 65
24.63
28.75
30. 17
32. 10
5.34
7. 12
FULL LOAD
HC
23. 61
4.96
5.56
6.48
7.88
10.42
11. 06
6. 80
37. 03
26. 77
11. 81
13. 52
9. 58
10. 10
27. 21
34.97
25. 16
26.65
CO
699.3
92. 0
111. 0
106.9
151.7
158.9
133. 0
80.5
180. 8
319.5
276.4
208. 2
145. 8
124.4
432.3
480.7
315.7
435.7
- 9071 KG
C02
1996
3009
2977
2981
2906
2887
2925
3021
2768
2582
2698
2799
2910
2942
2404
2303
2594
2400
NOX
0.09
5.79
9.75
9.56
17.99
29.05
41.82
67. 12
42.39
29.51
31.71
26.29
34.58
46.67
16.54
18.87
27.36
24.76
-------
TABLE 03-4.
1973 Ford D2GAS
APPENDIX C-3 (Cont'd.)
TRUCK 003 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
5.92 Litre V-8 GVW 10433 KG Project 11-4133
EMPTY LOAD - 5397 KG
HALF LOAD - 7257 KG
FULL LOAD - 9071 KG
O
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
RPM
700
1800
2200
1800
2400
2350
2150
2950
Man.
Vac.
18.5
19. 0
19. 0
17. 8
17.8
15.5
12. 0
7.6
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
RPM
700
1800
2200
1800
2400
2400
2100
2900
Man.
Vac.
18. 5
19. 1
18. 6
17.6
17. 6
16.4
12.7
8. 5
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
RPM
700
1750
2200
1850
2400
2350
2150
2950
Man.
Vac.
18. 5
19. 2
19. 0
17. 2
17.5
14.5
11. 0
4. 5
Period
Period
20±5
30±5
40±5
20±2
30±2
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
81
82
83
84
85
86
91
92
93
94
18.0
32.0
62.0
18.0
32. 0
62. 0
51
52
53
54
55
56
61
62
63
64
18. 0
32.0
62. 0
18. 0
32. 0
62.0
Period
21
22
23
24
25
26
31
32
33
34
18.
32.
62.
18.
32.
62.
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLE 04-1.
1975 IHC D2GAS
APPENDIX C-4
TRUCK 004 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
5. 65 Litre V-8 GVW 10206 KG Project 11-4133
Tc-st
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
0 30±5
~ 40±5
*• 20±2
30±2
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD - 5261 KG
HC
43. 16
2. 33
1.76
1.40
2. 02
2. 59
3. 02
7. 87
5.38
2. 52
5.02
2. 20
2.73
23. 52
12. 01
8.80
6.56
CO
25.7
27.4
20. 2
17.6
22. 8
25.4
47. 0
66.4
31. 5
29.7
30. 6
19.4
30.9
53. 1
112. 2
54.5
78. 2
C02
1511
1012
636
689
567
540
706
813
517
507
636
497
508
1108
920
739
710
NOX
2. 27
1.92
1.57
1. 57
2. 28
3.78
6.69
5. 51
3.66
4. 18
3. 06
3.46
4. 84
3.97
4. 52
4. 51
6.90
Fuel*
71.35
44.88
28.47
30.49
25.75
24. 87
33.38
39.81
24.66
23. 74
29.57
22. 58
23.88
53.49
47.92
36.04
36. 08
HALF LOAD - 7257 KG
HC
46.46
2.87
1. 87
1.57
2.27
3. 10
3.33
7.76
4. 06
2. 87
7. 13
2.47
3. 11
23.91
12. 21
8.55
7.32
CO
19. 1
32. 6
19. 5
16. 2
21. 8
30.3
47.6
107.4
53. 2
51.9
48. 8
29. 1
48.4
84. 2
141. 3
79.5
127. 5
coz
1383
956
640
710
578
597
821
891
611
589
656
534
577
1180
940
762
750
NOX
2.91
1.94
1.82
1. 87
2. 55
5. 17
7.31
5.32
4.26
4. 29
3.42
2.77
4.56
3.99
4.32
4. 80
5.00
Fuel*
65.92
42.95
28. 58
31. 29
26. 19
27.66
38. 30
45. 81
29.92
28.73
31. 92
24.82
28. 01
58.68
50. 74
38. 60
41. 13
FULL LOAD - 9071 KG
HC
4.44
1. 14
1.33
1. 18
2.03
2.91
3.20
7.42
3.95
3. 11
6. 29
2.54
3.07
16.94
11.67
8.95
7.78
CO
66.4
37. 0
21.3
19. 1
17.6
30.0
48. 5
153. 2
88.8
75. 1
52. 2
28.3
40.0
88.0
176.3
105.6
158.0
CO2
1616
1059
643
703
575
583
821
954
628
589
709
541
596
1222
1006
805
749
NOX
1. 52
2. 25
1.51
1.56
2.58
5.61
6. 67
6.25
4.27
4.58
4.09
4.07
5.63
4.47
4.42
4.88
4.81
Fuel*
73. 31
47. 37
28. 78
31. 13
25.73
27. 00
38.34
51. 50
32.97
30. 29
34. 28
25.09
28. 25
59.75
55. 80
42.23
43. 17
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
o
APPENDIX C-4 (Cont'cl.)
TABLE 04-2. TRUCK 004 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1975 IHC D2GAS 5.65 Litre V-8 GVW 10206 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±5
20±2
30±2
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
4. 09
5.81
0. 62
0. 70
0. 76
1.63
2. 77
4.47
4.22
4. 30
2.70
2. 70
1. 77
2.93
3.38
3. 27
3.66
3.65
CO
3.
3.
7.
8.
9.
18.
27.
69.
35.
25.
31.
16.
15.
33.
7.
30.
22.
43.
0
5
3
1
5
3
2
7
6
2
9
5
6
2
6
5
7
4
co2
69
203
269
255
373
455
578
1048
436
414
545
342
398
545
159
250
307
394
5261 KG
NOX
0. 00
0. 31
0. 51
0. 63
0. 85
1. 83
4. 04
9.92
2.95
2.93
4.49
1. 65
2. 77
5. 20
0.57
1. 23
1.87
3. 83
Fuel*
27.
71.
88.
85.
123.
154.
198.
369.
159.
147.
190.
118.
135.
191.
57.
97.
111.
149.
38
66
96
21
28
40
52
67
30
28
32
88
22
40
38
35
84
61
HALF
HC
3. 16
6.33
0. 76
0.75
0. 84
1.83
3.31
4. 90
4. 17
3.27
3.09
3.83
1. 98
3.33
3.35
3.34
3.45
4. 03
2.84
3.24
8.27
8.08
LOAD - 7257 KG
CO
2.
2.
8.
7.
8.
17.
32.
70.
57.
42.
55.
26.
23.
51.
11.
38.
32.
70.
32.
27.
369.
347.
6
6
6
8
7
5
4
1
7
8
7
2
4
8
8
7
1
1
5
9
2
6
C02
71
188
254
257
381
465
638
1209
478
492
632
352
429
617
165
257
308
412
346
368
720
763
NOX
0. 00
0. 40
0. 51
0. 73
1. 00
2. 05
5. 52
10. 77
2. 86
3. 43
4. 60
1. 83
2. 23
4.88
0. 56
1. 18
1. 94
2. 75
2. 17
2. 85
0.85
1.26
Fuel*
26.
67.
85.
85.
125.
157.
220.
421.
183.
179.
230.
127.
148.
223.
61.
103.
116.
168.
128.
133.
418.
421.
95
09
06
62
28
18
59
01
72
69
25
92
85
73
42
66
44
86
04
25
48
08
FULL LOAD - 9071
HC
5.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
3.
4.
3.
3.
3.
3.
2.
3.
2.
3.
3.
4.
00
60
30
54
63
62
12
73
98
18
33
35
05
29
44
19
60
35
CO
2.8
9. 0
9.8
8.6
10.3
14. 1
32. 1
71. 7
82. 2
71. 5
80. 5
27. 8
22. 8
42.8
12. 7
48. 1
42. 5
88.3
co2
62
218
282
259
379
461
624
1214
512
506
631
378
436
638
176
275
324
418
KG
NOX
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
2.
6.
9.
3.
3.
4.
2.
3.
6.
0.
1.
1.
2.
02
20
60
61
84
07
01
86
36
44
91
18
28
03
64
21
96
69
Fuel*
25.87
73.82
94. 12
86.35
125.27
154. 04
215. 87
423.23
206. 38
198.31
242.41
136.41
151. 06
225.71
64.32
113.74
126. 94
180. 10
*Fuel Consumption in Grams/Minute
9-FTP - Nine-Mode Federal Test Procedure
9-WOT - Wide Open Throttle at 2000 RPM
-------
o
APPENDIX C-4 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 04-3. TRUCK 004 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1975IHCD2GAS 5. 65 Litre V-8 GVW 10206 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±5
20±2
30±2
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY LOAD
HC
109.53
81.02
6.96
8. 26
6. 17
10.53
13.96
12. 10
26.47
29.22
14. 20
22.75
13.07
15. 29
58.89
33.56
32.71
24.36
CO
108. 3
48.3
81. 7
95. 1
77.4
118. 5
137.0
188.5
223. 5
170.9
167.6
138.4
115.3
173.3
133.0
313. 7
202.6
290.3
- 5261
C02
2525
2837
3019
2994
3028
2950
2910
2835
2734
2808
2861
2880
2947
2849
2774
2570
2747
2636
KG
NOX
0.05
4.27
5.72
7.39
6.89
11.84
20.37
26.82
18.52
19.90
23.59
13.88
20.52
27. 16
9.94
12.62
16.76
25.61
HALF
HC
107. 25
94.40
8.94
8.77
6.73
11.63
14.99
11. 64
22.69
18. 19
13.40
29.91
13.32
14.89
54.58
32. 23
29.65
23.84
22. 19
24.33
19.76
19.19
LOAD -
CO
97.6
38. 7
101. 6
91.3
69.4
111.4
146.8
166. 6
314.0
238. 2
242. 1
204. 7
156.9
231.6
192.3
373. 0
275. 7
415. 2
253.4
209.5
882.3
825.4
7257 KG
C02
2644
2809
2981
2998
3039
2958
2891
2871
2604
2737
2747
2753
2881
2758
2694
2481
2642
2441
2701
2763
1720
1812
NOX
0. 13
5.91
6. 04
8.52
8.02
13.03
25.03
25. 57
15.54
19.07
20.00
14.33
14.97
21.80
9. 10
11.40
16.64
16. 29
16.98
21.37
2.02
2.99
FULL LOAD
HC
103. 13
8. 11
3. 23
6. 20
5. 06
10.54
14.44
11. 17
19.30
16. 04
13. 75
24.59
13.56
14.57
37.98
28.01
28.38
24. 14
CO
107. 5
121.4
104. 6
99. 1
82.3
91.6
148.8
169.5
398.5
360.7
331.9
204. 1
150.9
189.7
197. 2
423. 2
335.0
490.3
- 9071 KG
C02
2388
2953
2995
2994
3024
2992
2890
2868
2482
2552
2604
2771
2889
2825
2739
2416
2553
2323
NOX
0.61
2.76
6.36
7.02
6.71
13.43
27.83
23. 29
16. 26
17.34
20.26
15.98
21.71
26.70
10.01
10.61
15.47
14.92
-------
TABLE 04-4.
1975 IHC D2GAS
APPENDIX C-4 (Cont'd.)
TRUCK 004 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
5.65LitreV08 GVW 10Z06 KG Project 11-4133
EMPTY LOAD - 5261 KG
HALF LOAD - 7275 KG
FULL LOAD - 9071 KG
O
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
RPM
625
1700
1850
1700
2225
2000
2150
2950
Man.
Vac.
18.0
20.0
20.4
19.2
19. 0
15.5
12.7
8.5
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
RPM
625
1725
1800
1675
2225
2025
2175
2925
Man.
Vac.
18.0
20.0
20. 6
19.5
18.5
15.0
12. 0
7.0
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
RPM
625
1760
1880
1650
2300
2000
2175
3000
Man.
Vac.
18. 0
20. 0
20. 5
19.5
18. 0
15. 0
11. 0
5. 5
Period
20±5
30±5
40±5
20±2
30±2
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
81
82
83
84
85
86
91
92
93
94
16. 0
34. 0
60. 0
16. 0
34. 0
60. 0
Period
51
52
53
54
55
56
61
62
63
64
16. 0
34. 0
60.0
16. 0
34. 0
60. 0
Period
21
22
23
24
25
26
31
32
33
34
16.
34.
60.
16.
34.
60.
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
APPENDIX C-5
TABLE 05-1. TRUCK 005 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
1965 Chevrolet D2GAS 4. 79 Litre 1-6 GVW 8845 KG Project 11-4 133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
0 40±5
,1 20±2
00 30±2
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
16.97
8.71
9. 80
4.31
2.03
1.00
10.01
4.89
3.49
1.31
4.60
2.70
1.08
21.31
13.33
6.57
6.49
CO
123.8
59.0
32.9
24. 0
14. 5
23. 5
28. 1
35.8
28.0
28.9
33. 6
13.9
25.5
104.9
140. 1
103.0
131.5
CO2
2044
1049
564
579
468
537
722
653
517
548
608
430
569
1035
886
738
698
5080 KG
NOX
4.47
2.86
1.99
2.91
5. 18
7.43
1.00
4.91
4.02
5.57
3. 10
3.58
6.03
6. 18
2.99
4.30
4.38
Fuel*
96.85
49.43
27.32
26.63
21. 00
24.39
33.73
30.63
24. 16
25.24
28.56
19.46
25.87
53.54
48.53
38.90
39. 12
HALF LOAD -
HC
19.30
7.70
10. 65
3. 85
1.84
1. 11
3. 19
6.59
3.58
2.05
4.62
2.60
1.22
21.31
15.01
6.79
6.98
CO
117.8
53. 1
36.6
27.3
14.6
26.0
234.6
73.0
63.5
89.0
39.9
24.3
35. 1
106.0
197.2
77.5
183.3
C02
1995
1015
527
565
470
553
603
679
505
585
626
497
604
1039
895
710
715
7257 KG
NOX
4. 17
2.51
1.65
2.61
4.59
8. 14
2.55
4.86
3.45
4.50
2.91
4.04
6.55
4. 18
3. 10
4.55
3.67
Fuel*
94.73
47.46
26. 12
26. 19
21.09
25. 25
41.48
34.44
26.03
30.91
29.71
22.98
28.04
53.80
52.93
36.07
43.34
FULL LOAD - 9071 KG
HC
26.78
8.04
10.94
3.23
1. 25
0.89
4.32
6.53
3.95
2.62
5.28
2.85
1.47
20.59
15.72
8. 10
8. 16
CO
9*8.6
55.2
24. 2
21. 1
12.5
18. 1
255.0
145. 5
114.2
145.7
38.5
25.7
60. 1
127.4
219. 1
169. 1
225. 2
C02
17~96
1097
627
564
493
614
638
688
539
681
693
546
691
1030
933
840
793
NOX
2. ~7 2
2. 64
2.23
3.28
4. 59
6.79
4. 65
3.33
2.67
4.66
4.65
5. 16
7.25
3.52
3.48
4.23
3.79
Fuel*
86.05
51.08
29. 57
25.66
21.83
27. 26
44.48
39.61
30.89
38.80
32.54
25. 18
33.40
54.73
56.08
47.82
49.58
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
o
APPENDIX C-5 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 05-2. TRUCK 005 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1965 Chevrolet D2GAS 4. 79 Litre 1-6 GVW 8845 KG Project 1 1-4 133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±5
20±2
30±2
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
2.
2.
2.
3.
2.
1.
1.
14.
2.
2.
1.
2.
2.
1.
3.
3.
2.
3.
19
32
30
93
32
63
08
77
62
82
39
51
17
16
00
62
72
63
CO
2.3
16.9
15. 6
13.2
12.9
11. 7
25. 2
41. 5
19.2
22. 6
30. 7
18. 4
11. 2
27.4
14.8
38.0
42. 7
73.5
C02
56
279
277
226
311
377
578
1066
350
418
583
332
346
612
146
241
306
390
5080 KG
NOV
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
4.
7.
1.
2.
3.
5.
1.
2.
6.
0.
0.
1.
2.
02
61
76
80
57
17
99
48
63
25
93
69
88
49
87
81
78
45
Fuel*
21.
98.
97.
81.
106.
126.
195.
371.
122.
145.
200.
116.
116.
207.
56.
98.
120.
163.
10
73
41
70
99
43
99
73
65
92
41
51
99
93
25
35
34
19
HALF
HC
2.47
2. 64
2. 04
4.30
2. 08
1.47
1. 19
4. 68
3.56
2.89
2. 20
2. 49
2. 10
1.31
3. 11
4. 20
2.82
3.90
2.84
2.74
3. 84
3.85
LOAD - 7257
CO
4.
16.
14.
14.
14.
11.
27.
344.
39.
51.
95.
21.
19.
37.
15.
55.
32.
102.
36.
36.
220.
217.
1
1
1
8
7
7
8
6
4
3
6
5
6
5
5
2
3
5
8
4
0
0
C02
41
272
269
213
305
377
590
885
367
408
628
338
401
646
152
250
295
400
308
308
759
744
KG
NOX
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
3.
8.
3.
2.
2.
4.
1.
3.
7.
0.
0.
1.
2.
1.
1.
5.
5.
02
57
67
67
41
68
69
74
63
79
83
57
26
01
61
87
89
05
85
95
60
80
FULL
Fuel*
17.
96.
94.
78.
105.
126.
201.
454.
138.
157.
247.
119.
138.
223.
58.
110.
112.
180.
118.
117.
352.
346.
61
57
00
72
56
15
17
85
87
13
78
80
23
83
64
56
02
85
22
83
32
19
HC
1.
3.
2.
4.
1.
1.
0.
6.
3.
3.
2.
2.
2.
1.
2.
4.
3.
4.
95
66
13
40
74
00
95
37
50
19
82
85
30
57
91
33
36
51
LOAD - 9071
CO
4.
13.
14.
9.
11.
10.
19.
375.
78.
92.
156.
20.
20.
64.
18.
60.
70.
124.
7
5
6
8
3
0
5
7
1
3
5
8
7
4
0
4
2
3
C02
53
246
291
252
304
396
660
940
369
436
732
374
440
740
145
257
349
438
KG
NOX
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
3.
7.
6.
1.
2.
5.
2.
4.
7.
0.
0.
1.
2.
02
37
70
90
76
68
30
85
79
16
01
51
15
76
50
96
76
09
Fuel*
20. 97
87.86
101. 17
88.80
103. 17
130.92
218.71
489.35
158.71
186.44
311.24
131.02
151. 36
266.95
57.71
115.43
148. 13
204. 35
*Fuel Consumption in Grams/Minute
9-FTP - Nine-Mode Federal Test Procedure
9-WOT - Wide Open Throttle at 2000 RPM
-------
o
M
O
APPENDIX C-5 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 05-3. TRUCK 005 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1965 Chevrolet D2GAS 4. 79 Litre 1-6 GVW 8845 KG Project 1 1-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±5
20±2
30±2
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY LOAD
HC
104. 02
23.47
23. 61
48.04
21.66
12.93
5.51
39.73
21.38
19.32
6.94
21.56
18.57
5.57
53.30
36.78
22.63
22. 22
CO
107. 1
171. 2
159. 8
161.2
120.9
92.3
128.8
111. 7
156. 5
155. 2
153. 1
157. 7
95.4
132.0
262.4
386.6
354.7
450.3
- 5080
CC-2
2671
2826
2843
2764
2911
2983
2950
2868
2856
2864
2907
2853
2961
2944
2588
2445
2540
2391
KG
NOX
0.83
6. 19
7.76
9.74
14. 63
33.02
40.78
3.97
21.47
22. 30
29. 58
14.53
24. 65
31. 22
15.47
8.25
14.81
15. 01
HALF LOAD
HC
' 100.35
27. 28
21.73
54.60
19.67
11. 69
5.90
10.29
25.65
18.40
8.89
20.81
15. 17
5.83
53.05
37.99
25. 21
21.58
24.00
23.24
10.90
11. 11
CO
234. 8
166.6
149.7
187.4
139. 5
92.7
138. 1
757. 5
283.9
326.4
385.7
179.9
141.8
167.6
263.8
498.9
287.9
566.6
311.3
308.7
6Z4. 5
626.8
- 7257 KG
C02
2356
2821
2865
2702
2888
2987
2934
1947
2642
2598
2535
2821
2898
2888
2587
2265
2637
2211
2604
2611
2154
2149
NOX
1.38
5. 89
7.09
8.48
13. 34
29. 17
43.20
8.23
18.91
17. 77
19.50
13. 12
23. 57
31.31
10.41
7.84
16.90
11.35
15.63
16. 55
15.90
16.76
FULL LOAD -
HC
92. 93
41. 69
21. 07
49.57
16.88
7.66
4. 37
13.02
22.08
17. 13
9.04
21.72
15. 18
5.90
50.38
37.55
22.68
22. 05
CO
226.0
153. 5
144.7
109. 8
110.0
76.6
88.9
767.8
492. 1
495.3
502. 8
158.4
136.9
241. 1
311.7
523.3
473.6
608.5
• 9071 KG
C02
2520
2796
2875
2840
2943
3025
3016
1922
2326
2337
2351
2852
2906
2772
2520
2228
2353
2143
NOX
0. 93
4. 23
6.92
10. 11
17. 10
28. 13
33. 36
14. 01
11. 26
11. 58
16. 10
19. 16
27.44
29.09
8. 61
6. 31
11. 65
10.23
-------
APPENDIX C-5 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 05-4. TRUCK 005 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
1965 Chevrolet D2GAS 4. 79 Litre 1-6 GVW 8845 KG Project 11-4133
EMPTY LOAD- 5080 KG
HALF LOAD - 7257 KG
FULL LOAD - 9071 KG
O
I
CO
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±5
20±2
30±2
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
81
82
83
84
85
86
91
92
93
94
Man.
RPM Vac.
560 16.0
2520 20. 2
2440 19.6
1720 17.8
2250 17.5
1950 13.8
2525 12. 2
3425 8. 1
Period
28.0
62. 0
94. 0
28.0
62.0
94.0
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
51
52
53
54
55
56
61
62
63
64
Man.
RPM Vac.
575 17.3
2400 20.0
2400 19.4
1760 18.6
2200 17.8
1920 13.6
2525 11.5
3400 7.0
Period
28.0
62. 0
94. 0
28. 0
62. 0
94.0
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
21
22
23
24
25
26
31
32
33
34
Man.
RPM Vac.
570 16.2
2460 20.0
2400 19. 5
1800 17.3
2250 17.4
2000 13.0
2575 10.0
3400 3.0
Period
28. 0
62. 0
94. 0
28. 0
62. 0
94.0
-------
o
TABLE 06-1.
1974 Ford D2GAS
APPENDIX C-6
TRUCK 006 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
6.41LitreV-8 GVW 10505 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Dcsc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±5
20±2
30±2
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY
HC
65.94
2. 52
1.46
1.80
2. 16
2.47
1.83
13. 12
5.97
2. 54
4. 16
2. 55
2.48
54.91
29.07
14. 55
11.55
CO
23.9
36.3
15.4
28.9
27. 8
28.2
14. 2
61. 1
31. 7
23. 7
52.3
34.4
26.3
74.5
108.2
54. 6
66.6
LOAD
C02
2342
1446
835
862
671
579
756
963
713
615
888
678
587
1529
1215
901
866
- 5216
NOX
4. 67
4. 52
2.75
4. 57
4. 79
6.69
11. 60
7.90
6.35
6. 70
4.44
4. 60
6. 30
5.90
6.28
7. 14
7.41
KG
HALF LOAD -
Fuel*
109.
63.
36.
38.
30.
26.
33.
46.
33.
27.
41.
31.
26.
76.
62.
43.
42.
4
9
5
6
5
7
1
5
1
9
5
3
9
9
4
6
6
HC
5.64
2.71
1.65
2. 14
2. 60
2. 77
1.73
13.96
9.93
3. 17
7.47
2.98
2.69
41.75
25.94
14. 64
10.82
CO
57. 1
38. 0
16.5
33.0
36.4
30.5
13.8
79.2
43.9
40. 8
56.9
40.7
26. 3
81. 6
110.9
68.4
86. 2
C02
2691
1546
894
930
726
654
862
1015
757
671
872
716
696
1539
1202
934
891
7257 KG
NOX
6. 01
4.56
2.91
4.81
5.27
7.34
13.85
9.76
8. 11
7. 74
5.52
5.68
8. 13
6.43
7.32
6.95
7.37
Fuel*
118.3
68.2
39. 1
41. 8
33.5
30. 0
37.6
50. 0
36.2
31.5
41.6
33.4
31. 5
76. 1
61.6
46.0
44. 8
FULL LOAD -
HC
5.33
3.78
1.99
2.92
3. 16
3. 27
3.61
16. 75
9.49
5. 12
7.85
2.75
2.54
54.59
35. 33
18. 12
14.70
CO
42.8
54. 6
25.3
46. 8
47. 4
38.7
68. 1
149. 1
69.1
62.2
62.5
32.0
22.7
109. 8
175.7
97. 8
141.3
9071 KG
CO2 NOX
2383
1490
849
901
731
656
874
1117
773
672
924
753
684
1516
1275
979
921
4.
4.
2.
4.
5.
7.
13.
9.
7.
6.
6.
6.
8.
5.
b.
6.
6.
43
41
68
98
61
98
66
50
55
38
70
05
13
33
82
92
47
Fuel*
.
104.3
67. 1
37.8
41. 6
34.5
30.7
41.9
59.4
38.5
33.2
44.3
34.3
30.7
78.7
70.3
50. 3
50.3
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/lOOkm
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
o
APPENDDC C-6 (Cont'd. )
TABLE 06-2. TRUCK 006 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1974 Ford D2GAS 6.41 Litre V-8 GVW 10505 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±5
20±2
30±2
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
8. 12
9. 06
0. 67
0.59
0.96
1.74
2. 64
2.70
7. 14
4. 88
2.73
2. 23
2.06
2.66
7.65
7.93
5.91
6.47
CO
3.
3.
9.
6.
15.
22.
30.
20.
33.
25.
25.
28.
27.
28.
10.
29.
22.
37.
3
3
7
2
4
5
2
9
3
9
5
1
8
2
4
5
2
3
C02
110
322
384
335
460
542
620
1113
524
583
663
477
548
629
213
331
366
485
5216 KG
NOX
0.
0.
1.
1.
2.
3.
7.
17.
4.
5.
7.
2.
3.
6.
0.
1.
2.
4.
01
64
20
10
44
87
16
07
30
19
22
39
72
75
82
71
90
15
Fuel*
44.
112.
126.
109.
153.
184.
213.
364.
189.
201.
224.
166.
188.
215.
80.
127.
132.
178.
5
3
7
2
9
0
1
2
1
6
5
6
9
0
0
1
3
1
HALF LOAD -
HC
8. 14
0. 77
0.72
0. 66
1. 15
2.09
2.97
2.55
7.47
7.98
3.40
4. 00
2.41
2.88
5.77
7. 11
5.97
6.05
5. 14
5.51
8.74
8.96
CO
4. 4
7.8
10. 1
6. 6
17.7
29.3
32.7
20. 4
42.4
35.2
43. 7
30. 5
32.8
28. 1
11.3
30.4
27.9
48.2
26. 1
26.4
279.2
278. 7
C02
116
367
411
360
500
585
703
1271
543
608
719
467
577
745
213
329
381
498
418
432
941
953
7257 KG
NOX
0.
0.
1.
1.
2.
4.
7.
20.
5.
6.
8.
2.
4.
8.
0.
2.
2.
4.
3.
4.
5.
6.
01
82
21
17
58
24
88
43
22
51
29
96
58
71
89
01
83
12
93
03
95
54
Fuel*
46.
120.
135.
117.
167.
201.
240.
413.
199.
217.
251.
166.
200.
252.
78.
126.
140.
187.
150.
155.
444.
447.
9
3
5
7
6
2
9
6
8
4
8
5
9
0
5
1
0
1
1
0
2
7
FULL LOAD -
HC
12.
0.
1.
0.
1.
2.
3.
5.
8.
7.
5.
4.
2.
2.
7.
9.
7.
8.
51
73
00
80
57
55
50
33
96
67
49
22
22
73
65
70
42
23
CO
1. 6
5.9
14. 5
10. 2
25. 2
38. 2
41. 4
100. 4
79. 8
55. 8
66.8
33. 5
25.8
24. 3
15.4
48.3
40. 1
79. 1
C02
86
326
395
342
485
590
702
1289
598
625
722
496
607
734
212
350
401
515
. 9071 KG
NOX
0.
0.
1.
1.
2.
4.
8.
20.
S.
6.
6.
3.
4.
8.
0.
1.
2.
3.
01
61
17
08
68
53
54
15
09
10
85
60
88
72
75
87
83
62
Fuel*
40.4
106. 5
132.9
113.7
167.2
207. 6
245.5
461.7
237. 1
232.4
266.3
177.4
206.5
246.3
82.3
144. 2
153.8
210. 1
*Fuel Consumption in Grams/Minute
9-FTP - Nine-Mode Federal Test Procedure
9-WOT - Wide Open Throttle at 2000 RPM
-------
APPENDIX C-6 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 06-3. TRUCK 006 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1974 Ford D2GAS 6.41 Litre V-8 GVW 10505 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±5
20±2
0 30±2
ro 40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY LOAD - 5216
HC
102.50
80. 72
5.29
5.36
6.23
9.47
12.39
7.42
37. 77
24.21
12. 18
13.41
10.92
12.36
95. 63
62.37
44. 66
36.33
CO
73. 6
29.3
76.2
56.3
100. 2
122. 3
141. 6
57. 3
175.9
128. 5
113. 7
168.7
147.3
131.0
129.7
232.2
167.5
209.4
CO2
2475
2867
3033
3064
2992
2947
2908
3056
2773
2891
2952
2862
2903
2924
2662
2607
2765
2725
KG
NOX
0. 13
5. 72
9.48
10. 07
15.85
21. 03
33. 60
46.88
22. 76
25. 74
32. 17
14.32
19. 70
31.41
10.28
13.47
21.91
23.31
HALF LOAD - 7257
HC
103. 52
6.39
5.33
5.64
6.85
10.40
12.34
6. 16
37.37
36.72
13.48
24.01
11.98
11.45
73.51
56.36
42.64
32.33
34.22
35.55
19.67
20.01
CO
93.9
64.7
74.7
56.5
105. 8
145. 6
135. 8
49.3
212. 1
162. 2
173. 5
182.9
163.3
111.6
143. 7
241.0
199.2
257. 5
173. 8
170. 6
628. 6
622.5
C02
2472
3047
3035
3063
2981
2908
2917
3072
2718
2798
2854
2806
2875
2958
2711
2612
2721
2662
2788
2789
2119
2128
KG
NOX
0. 14
6.80
8.96
9.98
15. 42
21. 10
32.72
49.39
26. 15
29.97
32.93
17.76
22.82
34.55
11.32
15.91
20. 24
22.04
26.22
26.00
13.40
14.62
FULL LOAD
HC
109. 43
6. 85
7. 54
7. 04
9.42
12. 29
14. 25
11. 53
37.80
32.99
20. 63
23. 77
10.75
11.08
92.92
67.32
48. 25
39. 17
CO
40. 2
55. 0
109.0
89.7
150.9
184.2
168.5
217.5
336.4
240. 2
250.8
189. 1
124.9
98.8
187.0
334.7
260. 6
376.5
- 9071 KG
C02
2126
3061
2974
3006
2902
2841
2859
2791
2521
2687
2710
2797
2939
2979
2581
2430
2607
2454
NOX
0. 18
5.69
8. 80
9. 50
16. 03
21. 80
34.81
43. 64
21.44
26. 24
25.73
20. 29
23. 61
35.41
9.07
13.00
18.43
17.24
-------
TABLE 06-4.
1974 Ford DEGAS
APPENDIX C-6 (Cont'd.)
TRUCK 006 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
6.41 Litre V-8 GVW 10505 KG Project 1 1-4 133
EMPTY LOAD -5216 KG
HALF LOAD -7Z57 KG
FULL LOAD- 9071 KG
O
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±5
20±2
30±2
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
Test Man.
No. RPM Vac.
71 800 16.0
72 2025 19.8
73 2175 19.2
74 1800 19.5
75 2425 18.3
76 2450 16.2
77 2200 13.3
78 3000 8.8
Period
81 16.0
82 28.0
83 56.0
84 16.0
85 28.0
86 56.0
91
92
93
94
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
51
52
53
54
55
56
61
62
63
64
Man.
RPM Vac.
800 16.0
2050 19.6
2200 19.2
1825 18.7
2450 17.8
2450 16.0
2200 12.5
3000 7.0
Period
16. 0
28.0
56. 0
16. 0
28.0
56.0
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
21
22
23
24
25
26
31
32
33
34
Man.
RPM Vac.
800 16.
2025 19.
2200 19.
1775 18.
2425 18.
2425 15.
2175 11.
3000 5.
Period
16.0
28. 0
56.0
16.0
28.0
56. 0
5
8
3
8
1
5
5
5
-------
o
TABLE 07-1.
1974 IHC D2GAS
APPENDIX C-7
TRUCK 007 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
6.42LitreV-8 GVW 10732 KG Project 11-4 133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±5
20±2
30±2
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
6.
2.
2.
1.
1.
1.
-
16.
3.
1.
3.
2.
2.
13.
13.
6.
5.
76
75
46
98
85
50
-
32
66
85
33
44
05
63
67
92
97
CO
163.6
66. 6
48.4
45. 0
34. 1
21. 6
--
91.9
50. 1
23. 1
78. 6
43. 4
30. 3
281.3
212.4
112. 0
102.0
C02
3040
1797
1 126
1176
827
701
--
1193
848
738
1187
811
718
1642
1264
997
964
5261 KG
NOX
3. 75
2. 78
1. 88
2. 85
3. 23
4. 26
'-
6.52
4. 65
4.65
3.40
3. 12
4. 18
3.03
4.31
4. 67
4.83
Fuel*
140
80
51
52
37
31
-
58
39
32
55
37
32
89
69
50
48
. 2
. 7
. 1.
.9
. 4
. 2
-
. 7
.6
.9
.8
.4
.6
.9
. 3
. 4
. 3
HC
6.
3.
2.
2.
2.
1.
4.
18.
9.
3.
4.
2.
2.
14.
14.
8.
8.
25
35
70
41
19
54
14
33
44
12
47
96
32
63
44
32
06
HALF LOAD -
CO
169. 8
80. 6
58.4
60. 5
42. 6
24. 1
122. 5
150.9
84.8
72. 7
115.7
70.8
42. 7
336.9
242. 8
147. 3
153.3
CO2
3202
1776
1149
1208
854
763
914
1108
819
750
1047
775
726
1603
1324
1051
1011
7257 KG
NOX
4. 10
2. 57
1.95
2.86
3.45
5.25
6.59
6. 75
4.99
4.97
3.72
3.62
5.44
3.40
5.49
5.27
5.55
Fuel*
147.
80.
52.
55.
39.
34.
47.
59.
41.
36.
52.
37.
33.
92.
74.
55.
53.
4
8
7
3
2
0
3
2
4
9
5
8
8
0
0
3
9
FULL LOAD - 9071 KG
HC
5.
3.
2.
2.
1.
1.
5.
20.
10.
3.
4.
2.
2.
14.
17.
9.
9.
97
05
48
04
88
53
09
66
75
59
80
71
50
11
66
05
81
CO
176. 1
87. 2
60. 8
59.5
37.5
22.4
154. 0
186.7
106.2
88.6
107.5
55. 2
40.0
262.5
263.2
138. 6
166.6
C02
3227
1758
1123
1214
878
800
948
1199
820
766
1054
797
754
1704
1413
1072
1047
NOX
4. 08
2. 61
1.92
2. 98
3. 84
5.92
6. 68
6.39
4. 89
4. 75
4. 31
3. 75
5.67
3.50
6.00
5.52
5.39
Fuel*
148. 8
80.4
51. 8
55. 5
39. 8
35. 5
50.9
65. 8
43. 1
38. 7
52. 3
37. 6
34. 8
91. 3
79.5
55.7
56.6
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-- Questionable Data Omitted
-------
o
APPENDIX C-7 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 07-2. TRUCK 007 SUMMARY - GRAMS /MINUTE
1974 IHC D2GAS 6. 42 Litre V-8 GVW 10732 KG Project 1 1-4 1 33
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±5
20±2
30±2
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
1.42
0. 91
0. 73
0. 99
1. 06
1. 49
1. 62
8. 87
2.96
1. 99
1. 77
1.97
2. 19
1.95
3. 80
2. 82
3. 31
CO
40. 5
22. 1
17. 6
19. 5
24. 3
27. 5
23. 2
49. 9
40. 5
24.9
41. 9
35. 1
32.4
40. 3
59. 0
45. 7
56. 6
C02
93
411
476
453
634
666
755
--
648
686
794
632
656
766
235
351
407
535
526
1 KG
NOX
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
2.
4.
-
3.
3.
5.
1.
2.
4.
0.
1.
1.
2.
01
51
74
76
54
60
59
54
76
00
81
52
47
43
20
90
68
Fuel*
50.
141.
159.
153.
213.
225.
251.
--
238.
239.
264.
221.
226.
259.
96.
143.
153.
200.
8
5
5
6
0
2
4
1
4
8
9
2
8
2
9
7
2
HALF
HC
1.
0.
0.
1.
1.
1.
1.
6.
10.
7.
3.
2.
Z.
2.
2.
3.
3.
4.
4.
4.
6.
7.
34
86
88
08
30
75
65
14
14
67
35
46
42
52
11
98
40
52
68
81
98
91
CO
41.
23.
21.
23.
32.
34.
25.
181.
83.
68.
78.
63.
57.
46.
48.
67.
60.
85.
41.
48.
225.
254.
LOAD - 7257 KG
4
3
2
5
6
1
7
7
5
9
2
6
8
4
6
0
3
9
3
8
1
0
C02
95
439
467
462
650
684
815
1355
613
665
807
576
632
789
231
365
430
567
452
424
961
917
NOX
0. 02
0. 56
0. 68
0. 78
1. 54
2. 76
5. 60
9. 78
3. 73
4. 06
5. 34
2.05
2.95
5.92
0.49
1.51
2. 16
3. 11
2.29
2. 03
7. 81
7. 05
FULL LOAD - 9071 KG
Fuel* H
-------
o
APPENDIX C-7 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 07-3. TRUCK 007 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1974 IHC D2GAS 6. 42 Litre V-8 GVW 10732 KG Project 1 1-4133
Test
De sc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±5
20±2
30±2
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY LOAD - 5261
HC
27. 98
6.46
4. 57
6.46
4.99
6.62
6.43
37.24
12.37
7.51
8.00
8.73
8.44
20.31
26.40
18.37
16.53
CO
797.3
156. 2
110. 5
126.8
113. 9
121. 9
92.4
209.7
169.2
93.9
188. 7
155.0
124. 6
419. 1
410.2
297.2
282.8
C02
1828
2903
2981
2950
2975
2957
3004
2722
2864
2998
2848
2898
2947
2446
2441
2644
2673
KG
NOX
0. 11
3. 58
4. 61
4. 92
7. 21
11. 54
18. 24
14. 87
15. 70
18.88
8. 15
11. 14
17. 18
4.52
8.32
12.38
13.38
HALF LOAD
HC
25.73
5.67
5.55
6.85
5. 84
7.47
6. 07
11. 73
41.41
30.47
11.30
11.40
10.48
9. 18
21.28
26. 14
20. 15
20.02
27.92
29.53
15.99
18.69
CO
796.9
154.2
133.5
148. 3
146. 2
145. 5
94. 7
347.0
340. 8
273. 7
263. 5
295. 0
250.7
169. 1
490. 0
439. 5
356.8
380.4
246. 1
299.7
584.0
600. 5
- 7257 KG
coz
1836
2909
2942
2915
2921
2917
3001
2587
2503
2643
2720
2670
2742
2875
2332
2396
2545
2508
2694
2605
2201
2167
NOX
0.40
3. 72
4. 26
4.95
6.92
11.78
20.63
18.66
15.24
16. 11
18.01
9.49
12. 80
21. 55
4. 95
9.93
12. 77
13.78
13. 67
12.45
17.88
16.67
FULL LOAD
HC
26.04
5. 37
5.08
6.40
4.93
6.31
5.75
13.36
42.04
33. 37
12.41
12.28
9.64
9.61
20. 70
29.73
21.76
23.22
CO
811.4
158.4
145. 2
157. 1
143. 6
127. 1
84. 6
404. 7
379.9
329. 5
306.2
275.2
196. 1
153. 6
384.9
443.3
333.2
394. 1
- 9071 KG
C02
1812
2903
2925
2902
2928
2950
3018
2491
2439
2546
2649
2698
2831
2898
2499
2379
2577
2477
NOX
0. 66
3. 67
4. 34
4.96
7. 19
12.92
22. 32
17. 55
12.99
15. 18
16.41
11. 03
13.33
21. 78
5. 14
10. 10
13.27
12.75
-------
APPENDIX C-7 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 07-4. TRUCK 007 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
1974 IHC DZGAS 6.42 Litre V-8 GVW 10732 KG Project 11-4133
EMPTY LOAD-5261KG
HALF LOAD - 7257 KG
FULL LOAD-9071 KG
O
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±5
20±2
30±2
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
81
82
83
84
85
86
91
92
93
94
Man.
RPM Vac.
780 18.0
2240 19.0
2360 18.0
2120 17.3
2800 17.0
2560 15.0
2400 11.5
3240 7.5
Period
16.0
30. 0
60.0
16. 0
30. 0
60. 0
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
51
52
53
54
55
56
61
62
63
64
Man.
RPM Vac.
760 18.0
2320 18.6
2320 18. 1
2160 17.2
2840 16.8
2560 14.5
2400 10.5
3240 6.8
Period
16. 0
30. 0
60. 0
16. 0
30. 0
60. 0
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Man.
RPM
740
2320
2360
2120
2840
2560
2400
3260
Vac.
17.
18.
18.
17.
16.
14.
9.
6.
6
4
0
2
5
2
8
3
Period
21
22
23
24
25
26
31
32
33
34
16. 0
30. 0
60. 0
16. 0
30. 0
60. 0
-------
o
APPENDIX C-8
TABLE 08-1. TRUCK 008 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
1967 Dodge D2GAS 5.92 Litre V-8 GVW 10433 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD - 5216 KG
HC
15. 29
7. 27
4. 64
4.08
2.83
2.35
1.87
29.90
9.00
2.48
62. 01
43.55
22. 12
18. 14
CO
368. 5
178.9
110.5
95.7
66.7
31. 0
15.2
67.0
54.9
35.4
330.3
213.0
127.9
123.7
C02
1840
949
546
575
465
584
777
661
455
560
1025
837
732
721
NOX
1.65
0. 94
0.49
1.39
3. 17
7.98
13.99
8.21
5.43
7.54
2.47
3. 13
5.59
6.09
Fuel*
104. 25
52.98
31. 02
31. 21
24.47
27.06
34. 10
36.40
24.07
26.33
73.54
55.35
42.39
41. 13
HALF LOAD -
HC
12.88
7.06
4.49
3.81
2.87
2.21
2. 63
35.59
16. 22
2.50
62.21
45.83
24.26
20.78
CO
371.2
180.3
109.4
97.4
64.2
20.3
27.5
137.9
66.0
30.9
351.6
264.8
151. 1
160. 1
C02
1844
977
546
595
500
632
857
726
494
629
1062
883
797
787
7257 KG
NOX
1.76
1.03
0.59
1.63
4.00
9.37
13.39
5.43
4.52
10.32
2.56
3.01
6.66
6.22
Fuel*
104.30
54. 19
30.94
32. 14
25.77
28.36
38.41
44.61
27.41
28.97
76.55
61.03
46.96
46.68
FULL LOAD - 9071 KG
HC
14.94
7.54
4.55
3.92
2.74
2.27
3. 27
48.29
22. 15
2.85
62.01
60.65
28. 15
26.56
CO
347. 6
177.9
106.0
99.9
57.7
18.4
46.9
171.6
132.2
40.0
384.9
325.8
226.6
281. 1
C02
1949
997
569
602
497
654
869
751
501
674
1303
1084
1014
954
NOX
2. 00
1. 11
0.70
1. 60
4.28
9.32
11.06
4.21
2.55
9.98
3.21
4.97
7.60
5.46
Fuel*
107.45
54.97
31. 70
32. 61
25.22
29. 16
40.28
49.61
32.90
31.51
88.92
75.56
61.65
62.54
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
o
APPENDIX C-8 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 08-2. TRUCK 008 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1967 Dodge D2GAS 5.92LitreV-8 GVW 10433 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY LOAD - 5216 KG
HC
8. 86
2. 09
1.93
1.87
2. 20
2.29
2. 51
2. 75
15. 73
7. 13
2. 61
8.66
1 1. 91
9.09
10. 13
CO
39.3
50.4
47.4
44.4
51.6
53.9
33. 2
22. 3
35.3
43.5
37.4
46. 1
58.3
52.5
69. 1
C02
58
252
252
219
310
376
625
1143
348
360
590
143
229
301
403
NOX
0. 00
0. 23
0.25
0. 20
0. 75
2.56
8.53
20. 58
4.32
4. 30
7.95
0.35
0. 85
2.30
3.40
Fuel*
43.63
106.45
104. 92
93. 07
125. 62
147. 60
216. 15
374. 57
142. 99
142. 38
207. 29
76. 67
113. 02
130.03
171.49
HALF LOAD - 7257 KG
HC
6. 03
1.76
1.87
1.81
2. 05
2. 31
2. 37
3. 87
19.20
13. 06
2.69
8. 85
12. 84
9.92
11.82
6.93
7.92
8.26
8.75
CO
35.7
50. 8
47.8
44.0
52.5
51.7
21.7
40.5
74.4
53. 1
33. 2
50.0
74. 2
61.8
91. 1
62.9
62. 1
398.9
389.8
CO2
58
252
259
220
321
402
676
1261
392
398
bib
151
247
326
448
327
340
798
826
NOX
0.01
0. 24
0. 27
0. 24
0.88
3. 22
10. 01
19. 70
2.93
3. 64
11.08
0.36
0.84
2. 73
3.54
2.41
2.60
1.53
2. 06
Fuel*
41.91
106. 50
107.33
92.92
129.34
154.80
226.40
421.82
179. 63
164.86
232. 30
81.27
127.67
143.41
198. 27
141.38
145.84
457.94
462.48
FULL LOAD - 9071 KG
HC
5.54
2. 04
2. 02
1.82
2. 12
2.22
2.45
4.84
25.70
17.66
3. 06
8. 72
16.84
11. 61
14.89
CO
30.6
47.5
47.7
42.5
53.9
46.8
19. 8
69.3
91.3
105.3
42.8
54. 1
90.5
93.5
157.6
C02
53
266
267
228
325
403
704
1285
400
399
721
183
301
418
535
NOX
0.01
0. 27
0. 30
0. 28
0.86
3.47
10. 04
16. 35
2.24
2.03
10. 69
0.45
1.38
3. 14
3. 06
Fuel*
37.37
109.53
110. 06
94.89
131.46
152.63
234.51
444. 57
197.09
195.81
251.80
93.37
156.63
189. 83
261.80
*Fuel Consumption in Grams/Minute
9-FTP - Nine-Mode Federal Test Procedure
9-WOT - Wide Open Throttle at 2000 RPM
-------
o
APPENDIX C-8 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 08-3. TRUCK 008 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1967 Dodge D2GAS 5.92 Litre V-8 GVW 10433 KG Project 11-4133
Test
De sc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY LOAD - 5216
HC
82.31
19. 64
18.39
20.04
17. 50
15.51
11.62
7.85
0.02
50.09
12. 61
2.93
5.39
69.88
59.06
CO
365.4
473.4
452. 2
477. 1
410.8
365. 2
153. 6
59.6
246. 7
305. 6
180. 2
601. 5
515. 5
404. 0
402.8
CO?
1334
2363
2401
2356
2469
2546
2891
3052
2433
2530
2846
1866
2025
2313
2349
KG
NOX
0. 01
2. 12
2.36
2. 13
5.97
17.35
39.49
54.96
30.22
30. 22
38.35
4. 50
7.56
17. 65
19.85
HALF LOAD
HC
103.94
16. 54
17.45
19.43
15. 88
14. 91
10.46
9. 17
6.86
79.24
11.56
8.85
0.57
69. 17
59.61
49.00
54.31
18.03
18.91
CO
851. 5
476. 7
445. 6
473. 5
405.9
333.9
95.9
96. 0
413.9
322.3
142. 9
615. 3
581. 0
431. 0
459.3
445. 2
425.7
871.2
842.9
- 7257
C02
1375
2368
2414
2364
2481
2597
2986
2990
2180
2412
2908
1858
1938
2273
2259
2315
2328
1743
1785
KG
NOX
0. 13
2. 26
2.55
2. 57
6.79
20.79
44. 23
46. 70
16.30
22.08
47.72
4.47
6.61
19.01
17.84
17. 06
17.85
3.34
4.46
FULL LOAD
HC
108.37
18. 62
18. 38
19. 22
16. 12
14.55
10.44
10.89
0.38
90. 17
12. 14
93.41
7.50
61. 15
56.89
CO
819. 5
433. 3
433.4
447.9
410. 1
306. 5
84.4
155.8
463.3
537.9
170.2
579.7
577.6
492.3
602.0
- 9071 KG
CO2
1411
2430
2430
2405
2474
2642
3004
2890
2028
2038
2864
1962
1921
2202
2043
NOX
0. 22
2. 50
2.69
2.94
6. 57
22. 73
42. 80
36. 77
11.38
10.38
42.43
4.84
8.80
16.52
11.70
-------
TABLE 08-4.
1967 Dodge D2GAS
APPENDIX C-8 (Cont'd.)
TRUCK 008 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
5.92 Litre V-8 GVW 10433 KG Project 11-4133
EMPTY LOAD-5216 KG
HALF LOAD - 7257 KG
FULL LOAD - 9071 KG
O
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
RPM
560
2100
I960
1520
2000
1840
2440
3300
Man.
Vac.
14.4
20. 0
19. 8
19.4
18. 6
15. 3
14. 0
9.9
Test
No,
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Period
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
81
82
86
91
92
93
94
18.
38.
48.
0
0
0
51
52
56
61
62
63
64
Man.
RPM
620
2160
2000
1520
2040
1860
2420
3320
Vac.
15.
20.
19.
18.
18.
14.
13.
8.
0
1
6
5
3
8
0
5
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Period
18.
38.
48.
0
0
0
21
22
26
31
32
33
34
Man.
RPM
620
2200
2040
1540
2040
1840
2440
3320
Vac.
14.
20.
19.
19.
18.
14.
12.
7.
8
0
8
1
1
6
2
5
Period
18.
38.
48.
0
0
0
-------
o
TABLE 09-1.
1971 IHC D3GAS
APPENDIX C-9
TRUCK 009 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
5.65 Litre V-8 GVW 18144 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS**
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD - 7257 KG
HC
8.60
4. 13
3. 27
1. 86
2.63
2.80
1.97
10.38
2.91
2.62
18. 29
13.89
10.45
8. 05
CO
164. 2
75.9
59.0
31. 2
33. 2
29.7
50.4
57. 1
35.4
30.3
273.3
144. 5
122.4
122.8
C02
1403
925
590
655
500
555
793
660
488
542
1128
926
826
820
NOX
2. 01
1.97
1.44
2.54
5.08
8. 79
9.32
5.59
5.39
7. 75
2.95
4.57
6. 01
6.29
Fuel*
71.
44.
29.
30.
23.
25.
37.
33.
143.
25.
68.
50.
44.
43.
33
66
28
00
69
81
12
08
51
26
25
59
44
87
HALF LOAD - 12473 KG
HC
9.91
4.47
3. 22
2. 80
2.79
2.79
3.65
13.97
7.75
3.00
38.49
15. 15
14.35
15. 28
CO
201.0
85.9
57. 7
48.3
37.5
30.7
145.2
54. 8
35.4
28.5
320.9
197. 5
179.7
171.9
CO2
1574
884
594
663
548
610
823
693
496
562
1191
939
917
857
NOX
2.90
1.82
1. 66
3. 16
6.61
9.58
7.65
7.61
5.53
8. 10
5.28
5.46
6.50
6.79
Fuel*
81. 18
43. 67
29.38
31. 59
26. 00
28. 20
44. 89
34. 81
24.33
26:03
76. 80
54. 84
52. 63
49.68
FULL LOAD - 18370 KG
HC
9.
4.
3.
2.
2.
2.
4.
20.
49.
3.
51.
19.
39.
36.
44
94
68
83
96
84
19
59
32
78
32
67
05
54
CO
172.
85.
60.
39.
30.
22.
118.
107.
102.
41.
316.
236.
223.
202.
5
7
8
5
5
6
2
2
3
5
2
2
5
5
C02
1544
852
574
682
576
704
865
857
528
698
1253
1075
1019
966
NOX
2
1
1
3
6
10
8
7
1
9
5
5
5
6
. 53
.74
.69
.56
.86
.29
. 27
.75
.48
.03
. 19
.36
. 19
.35
Fuel*
77.
42.
28.
3 1.
26.
31.
44.
46.
35.
32.
80.
63.
63.
59.
96
36
80
81
76
65
97
09
71
74
83
75
13
18
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
**50 mph at Full Load
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
o
APPENDIX C-9 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 09-2. TRUCK 009 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1971 IHC D3GAS 5.65 Litre V-8 GVW 18144 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS**
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY LOAD - 7257
HC
1. 14
1.25
1. 13
1.34
1.00
2. 12
2.99
2.90
5.63
2.40
2. 85
2.44
3. 71
4. 11
4. 16
CO
35. 2
23.8
20. 8
24. 2
16. 8
26. 7
31. 7
74. 0
31. 0
29. 1
32.9
36. 5
38.7
48. 2
63. 5
KG
CO2 NOX
82
203
253
242
353
402
593
1166
358
401
588
151
248
325
424
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
4.
9.
13.
3.
4.
8.
0.
1.
2.
3.
03
29
54
59
37
08
38
70
03
43
41
39
22
37
25
HALF LOAD - 12473 KG
Fuel*
44.
77.
91.
89.
120.
142.
205.
407.
133.
143.
204.
68.
101.
130.
169.
37
05
20
76
74
30
69
36
97
51
66
09
26
61
29
HC
1.46
1.44
1.22
1.32
1.51
2. 24
2.99
5.38
7.57
6.31
3.22
5. 11
3.99
5.44
7.51
5.37
4. 03
49.26
49.72
CO
42. 0
29.2
23. 5
23. 7
26. 1
30. 1
32. 8
213. 8
29.7
28. 8
30. 6
42.6
52. 1
68. 1
84. 5
32.3
27.4
176. 0
163. 0
C02
79
228
242
244
357
440
653
1211
376
404
604
158
248
348
421
327
324
636
648
NOX
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
5.
10.
11.
4.
4.
8.
0.
1.
2.
3.
3.
3.
2.
2.
04
42
50
68
70
31
25
26
12
51
71
70
44
47
33
42
37
30
35
Fuel*
47.
87.
89.
89.
127.
155.
225.
493.
140.
148.
209.
76.
107.
148.
182.
124.
119.
335.
335.
30
92
10
93
12
93
32
42
80
10
00
08
91
97
28
61
97
11
06
FULL LOAD - 18370
HC
1. 27
1.38
1. 37
1. 51
1.52
2.38
3. 03
5.59
11.02
38. 53
3.98
6.58
4. 84
13. 75
16. 38
CO
37.6
25. 2
23. 7
24.9
21. 3
24. 5
24. 1
157. 9
57.4
79.9
43. 7
40. 5
58. 1
78. 7
90. 8
CO2
82
225
236
236
367
464
753
1155
459
412
735
161
264
359
433
KG
NOV
_ JV_
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
5.
11.
11.
4.
1.
9.
0.
1.
1.
2.
03
37
48
69
92
52
00
04
15
16
51
67
32
83
85
Fuel*
45. 74
84. 85
87.45
88. 22
128. 00
160. 86
252. 61
448. 35
184. 18
208. 28
257.54
77. 38
117. 08
165.90
198. 01
*Fuel Consumption in Grams/Minute
**50 mph at Full Load
9-FTP - Nine-Mode Federal Test Procedure
9-WOT - Wide Open Throttle at 2000 RPM
-------
o
APPENDDC C-9 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 09-3. TRUCK 009 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1971 IHC D3GAS 5.65LitreV-8 GVW 18144 KG Project 11-4133
Tost
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
ZO SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS*
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY
HC
25.68
16. 16
12. 38
14.94
8.32
14. 87
14. 54
7. 12
42.02
16.71
13.91
35.89
36.69
31.49
24.58
LOAD
CO
793. 1
308.4
227.7
269.8
139.3
188.0
154.3
181. 7
231.3
202.8
160. 7
536.4
382.5
368.9
374.9
- 7257
C0?
1842
2634
2772
2698
2924
2827
2881
2861
2673
2798
2873
2213
2452
2490
2502
KG
NOX
0.65
3.78
5.89
6. 57
11.33
28.70
45.60
33. 64
22. 62
30.90
41. 10
5.79
12. 10
18. 11
19.22
HALF
HC
30.96
16. 35
13.71
14.68
11. 87
14.39
13. 27
10.90
53. 75
42. 64
15.41
67. 13
37.01
36. 52
41.21
43. 13
33.55
7.00
8.38
LOAD
CO
888. 5
331. 6
263.6
263. 2
205.0
192.9
145. 6
433. 2
210.9
194. 6
146.4
559. 6
482.4
457.4
463.5
258.8
228.7
513.2
486. 6
- 12473
C02
1675
2596
2712
2709
2810
2821
2898
2454
2668
2728
2890
2077
2294
2335
2311
2626
2704
1897
1934
KG
NOX
0. 80
4. 79
5.59
7.58
13.41
34. 04
45.48
22. 83
29. 28
30.43
41.66
9. 20
13.34
16.55
18.29
27.47
28.06
6.87
7.01
FULL
HC
27.73
16. 23
15. 61
17. 14
11.91
14.81
12.01
12.47
59.83
204.99
15.46
85.04
41.33
82.86
82.71
LOAD -
CO
821.5
296.4
271. 1
282. 5
166.3
152.4
95.5
352. 1
311. 6
383.8
169.8
523.9
496.3
474. 2
458.4
18370
CO2
1791
2652
2694
2671
2870
2883
2981
2577
2490
1980
2854
2077
2259
2162
2187
KG
NOX
0.72
4. 35
5.49
7.86
14.99
34.31
43. 56
24.62
22. 53
5.57
36.92
8.60
11. 27
11. 01
14.37
*50 mph at Full Load
-------
APPENDIX C-9 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 09-4. TRUCK 009 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
1971 IHC D3GAS 5. 65 Litre V-8 GVW 18144 KG Project 11-4133
EMPTY LOAD - 7257 KG
HALF LOAD- 12473 KG
FULL LOAD - 18370 KG
O
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS*
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
RPM
800
1800
1900
1700
2250
2000
2175
3025
Man.
Vac.
19.7
21. 1
20.0
20. 0
19. 0
16.8
12. 0
5. 2
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Period
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
81
82
86
91
92
93
94
34.
76.
196.
0
0
0
51
52
56
61
62
63
64
RPM
800
1900
1950
1700
2200
2025
2200
2975
Man.
Vac.
19.5
21.0
20.8
19.6
18.8
15.5
10. 0
2.6
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Period
34.
76.
196.
0
0
0
21
22
26
31
32
33
34
Man.
RPM
775
1900
1900
1700
2225
2000
2150
2750
Vac.
19.
21.
20.
19.
18.
13.
8.
0.
6
0
6
6
5
5
0
5
Period
34.
76.
196.
0
0
0
*50 mph at Full Load
-------
TABLE 10-1.
1974 IHC TTGAS
APPENDIX C-10
TRUCK 010 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
7. 83 Litre V-8 GVW 20412 KG Project 11-4 1 33
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS**
20±5
30±5
40±2
9 05 AVG.
« 10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD - 7257 KG
HC
11.96
5. 17
4. 74
3. 24
2.79
2. 70
4.48
8.35
3. 83
2. 60
28.78
24. 17
20.94
17.44
CO
153.9
72. 2
45. 5
34.9
21.4
25.0
114. 6
42.4
23. 2
25.3
216. 2
195. 2
196. 0
242. 2
CO?
3272
2146
1208
935
726
846
1018
825
654
807
1535
1154
1113
1087
NOX
7. 18
7. 70
4.35
4. 01
5.37
12. 39
15. 02
6.39
7.69
12. 54
8.74
8.58
10.06
9.37
Fuel*
150. 09
96. 19
54. 71
42. 27
32.47
37. 78
51. 23
38.82
29. 67
36. 15
83.07
64.97
62.86
64.35
HALF LOAD -
HC
10. 89
4. 66
3.38
2.83
2. 74
3. 13
4. 29
13.30
4. 70
3.93
29.32
24.77
23.64
20.42
CO
124.4
64.3
39. 8
30. 1
19. 1
27.3
102.4
59.0
47.8
54.0
291.5
301.4
276.4
330.3
CO2
3324
2146
1220
996
757
941
949
903
740
896
1675
1281
1168
1165
12473 KG
NOX
7. 77
7.79
4. 63
5.38
7. 15
16. 54
16.24
10. 75
9.57
16.92
6.55
7.40
8.91
8.33
Fuel*
150. 18
95.57
54. 67
44.48
33. 61
41.99
47.46
43.84
35.05
41.99
94. 08
77.47
70.87
73.90
FULL LOAD - 18370 KG i
HC
12.73
5.45
3.29
3. 20
3. 08
3.68
4.78
17.94
9. 14
4. 23
45.44
36.21
30.99
22.05
CO
149. 2
77.3
41. 7
34. 7
24. 0
42. 6
138. 9
125. 8
132.9
59.9
364.7
385.8
391. 0
355. 6
CO2
3500
2119
1044
976
800
1012
1036
904
741
1013
1905
1523
1384
1224
NOX
8.66
7. 17
3.66
4.78
8.63
18. 11
12. 83
10.44
6.28
18.59
10. 15
7.70
7.83
7.90
Fuel*
159.51
95.42
47.34
44. OO1
35. 82
46. 11
53.65
1
48.95
41.35
47.37
110.791
94. 84 1
88.60J
78. 28'
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
**50 mph at Full and Half Loads
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
o
I
LO
sO
APPENDIX C-10 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 10-2. TRUCK 010 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1974 IHC TTGAS 7.83 Litre V-8 GVW 20412 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS**
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY
HC
2. 67
1.73
1. 42
1.95
1. 77
2.26
2.91
6.59
4. 67
3. 21
2.90
4. 12
6. 81
8.54
9.61
CO
19.
22.
19.
18.
19.
17.
27.
168.
23.
19.
28.
31.
55.
79.
133.
LOAD -
9
3
8
7
1
3
0
6
7
4
1
0
0
9
6
C02
97
475
588
498
511
589
911
1498
461
547
898
220
325
454
599
7257 KG
NOX
0. 02
1.04
2. 11
1.79
2. 19
4.36
13. 35
22. 11
3.57
6.43
13. 95
1.25
2.42
4. 10
5. 16
Fuel*
43.
162.
196.
168.
172.
196.
303.
562.
161.
185.
300.
88.
136.
191.
264.
19
55
60
29
50
83
81
86
90
28
23
82
63
40
78
HALF LOAD - 12473 KG
HC
2.58
1.57
1. 28
1.39
1. 55
2. 22
3.39
6. 28
7.46
3.93
4. 36
4. 04
6.82
9.25
10. 60
4.51
4.58
8.99
8.72
CO
19.3
17.9
17.6
16.3
16.4
15. 5
29.5
150. 1
33. 1
40.0
59.9
40.2
83.0
108.2
171.4
37.2
36.3
419.8
377.3
co2
102
479
587
501
543
613
1019
1390
506
619
995
231
353
457
604
558
564
968
959
NOX
0. 05
1. 12
2. 13
1. 90
2.93
5. 80
17.92
23. 80
6. 03
8. 02
18.78
0.90
2. 04
3.49
4.32
6.81
6.65
3.84
4. 08
Fuel*
44.
161.
195.
167.
181.
203.
339.
519.
183.
219.
347.
96.
159.
207.
286.
199.
200.
522.
498.
41
56
33
61
08
39
66
35
70
22
86
80
27
13
27
10
64
55
37
FULL LOAD - 18370 KG
HC
3.
1.
1.
1.
1.
2.
3.
7.
10.
7.
4.
6.
9.
11.
11.
04
84
49
54
75
51
99
03
08
59
69
16
55
73
01
CO
19. 8
21. 6
21. 2
19. 5
19. 0
19.6
46.2
204. 1
70.7
110.3
66.4
49.4
101.8
148. 0
177. 6
C02
98
507
580
490
535
652
1098
1523
508
615
1123
258
402
524
611
NOX
0. 04
1. 25
1.96
1. 72
2. 62
7. 03
19. 64
18. 86
5. 87
5. 21
20. 61
1. 37
2. 03
2.96
3.95
Fuel*
43.
172.
195.
165.
179.
217.
373.
588.
205.
256.
392.
112.
186.
250.
291.
63
60
03
74
85
84
28
74
38
37
02
07
80
38
88
*Fuel Consumption in Grams /Minute
**50 mph at Full and Half Loads
9-FTP - Nine-Mode Federal Test Procedure
9-WOT - Wide Open Throttle at 2000 R PM
-------
APPENDIX C-10 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 10-3. TRUCK 010 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1974 IHC TTGAS 7. 83 Litre V-8 GVW 20412 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS*
20±5
30±5
9 40±2
o
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY
HC
61. 84
10.67
7. 20
11. 60
10. 26
11. 50
9. 58
11. 70
28. 82
17.30
9.65
46.41
49. 83
44. 62
36. 29
LOAD
CO
460.0
137.3
100.5
111.3
110.6
88. 1
88.8
299.5
146.3
104. 6
93.7
348. 6
402.4
417.7
504.5
- 7257
C02
2251
2920
2989
2958
2963
2994
3000
2662
2848
2950
2992
2474
2379
2372.
2262
KG
NOX
0.55
6.41
10.73
10.65
12.70
22. 13
43.94
39.27
22.06
34.71
46.48
14. 10
17.68
21.44
19.50
HALF
HC
58. 13
9. 71
6.54
8. 28
8.53
10.93
9.98
12. 10
40.62
17.95
12. 54
41. 74
42.83
44. 68
37.01
22.67
22. 85
17. 20
17. 50
LOAD -
CO
434. 6
110.9
90. 1
97.5
90. 7
76.2
87.0
289. 1
180.4
182. 6
172. 1
414.9
521. 1
522.5
598. 6
187. 1
181. 0
803.4
757.0
12473
C02
2302
2964
3007
2990
3000
3015
3001
2677
2757
2826
2859
2385
2215
2207
2112
2804
2813
1853
1924
KG
NOX
1. 13
6.93
10.92
11.35
16. 21
28.51
52.76
45.82
32.84
36.56
53.99
9.32
12.79
16.83
15. 10
34.20
33. 12
7.35
8. 19
FULL
HC
69.67
10.68
7.65
9.31
9.73
11. 53
10.69
11.94
49.09
29.60
11. 96
54.94
51. 14
46.86
37.72
LOAD -
CO
453.4
125. 3
108. 5
117.9
105. 5
89.9
123.7
346. 7
344. 2
430.3
169.4
440.9
544.9
591. 2
608.4
18370
co2
2236
2939
2975
2955
2973
2992
2941
2587
2473.
2399
2865
2303
2151
2092
2094
KG
NOX
0.86
7. 27
10.07
10.36
14. 57
32. 27
52. 62
32.04
28.56
20.34
52.56
12.27
10.87
11.84
13.52
*50 mph at Full and Half Loads
-------
TABLE 10-4.
1974 IHC TTGAS
APPENDIX C-10 (Cont'd.)
TRUCK 010 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
7. 83 Litre V-8 GVW 20412 KG Project 11-4133
EMPTY LOAD - 7257 KG
HALF LOAD - 12473 KG
FULL LOAD - 18370 KG
O
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS*
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
Man.
RPM
700
2400
2550
2150
2025
1800
2400
2825
Vac.
19.
19.
18.
18.
17.
15.
12.
6.
5
1
3
1
9
1
8
0
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Period
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
81
82
86
91
92
93
94
38.
68.
96.
0
0
0
51
52
56
61
62
63
64
RPM
700
2425
2500
2150
2050
1825
2400
2600
Man.
Vac.
19.5
19. 1
18.3
18. 1
17.4
13. 5
11.0
4. 5
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Period
38.
68.
96.
0
0
0
21
22
26
31
32
33
34
Man.
RPM
700
2375
2500
2125
2000
1800
2400
2600
Vac.
19.
19.
18.
18.
17.
14.
9.
4.
6
0
5
4
3
2
5
5
Period
38.
68.
96.
0
0
0
*50 mph at Full and Half Loads
-------
o
APPENDIX C-ll (Cont'd. )
TABLE 11-3. TRUCK Oil SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1974 Chevrolet D3GAS 6. 00 Litre V-8 GVW 18598 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS*
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY LOAD - 5216 KG
HC
25.01
2. 82
8.30
9.41
10.44
10.96
12. 11
11.76
10.38
10.33
13.08
26.41
26.50
25.79
21.38
CO
329.3
61. 7
204. 7
229. 6
244.5
254. 5
262. 7
224. 7
228. 5
233.3
262. 7
238.8
236.6
227.3
205. 6
coz
2573
3063
2821
2779
2752
2735
2718
2779
2777
2770
2715
2710
2714
2731
2779
NOX
1. 03
3. 04
4.48
4.82
5. 70
9.67
15.94
28.94
8. 28
12. 27
18.35
10. 62
14.45
20.97
27. 96
HALF LOAD
HC
34.59
2. 72
7.98
9.51
10.85
11.29
12.68
13. 18
29.72
12.01
13.64
26.61
29.04
23.59
22.55
26. 16
24.73
15. 18
13.53
CO
306. 5
68.9
214. 1
245. 0
251. 9
233. 0
243.4
234. 1
215.9
184. 8
251. 1
275. 1
254.4
240. 7
256. 1
217. 5
234. 5
231.9
287. 0
- 12473
coz
2578
3053
2808
2754
2739
2767
2747
2760
2736
2841
2732
2653
2678
2716
2695
2745
2723
2757
2675
KG
NOX
1. 15
4. 18
5. 28
5. 73
7. 05
14. 77
27.36
42. 83
18.82
24. SI
23.95
13. 85
19. 63
26.94
26. 65
19. 61
16. 15
45.54
33. 93
FULL LOAD
HC
59. 21
3.69
8. 00
9. 24
10. 83
11.30
12. 62
13. 85
29. 56
19.37
12. 89
43.44
30. 18
27.38
24. 83
CO
437.5
64. 2
210.8
209. 6
230.3
241. 5
211. 5
281. 1
233.0
224. 0
213. 7
320. 1
293.2
305.3
373, 1
- 18370 KG
C02
2294
3057
2813
2811
2773
2754
2797
2684
2710
2756
2793
2529
2613
2603
2504
NOX
1. 02
3. 40
4. 79
5. 76
7. 66
17. 71
33. 15
39. 00
23. 01
26. 76
34. 09
13. 28
19. 88
25. 93
23. 24
#50 mph at Full Load and 53 mph at Half Load
-------
o
APPENDIX C-l 1
TABLE 11-1. TRUCK Oil SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
1974 Chevrolet D3GAS 6. 00 Litre V-8 GVW 18598 KG Project 1 1-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS**
20±5
30±5
40±Z
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
2. 24
3.91
3. 43
2.99
2. 68
2. 63
2.47
2.93
2.34
2. 56
14.89
11. 22
9.50
6.76
CO
49. 0
96. 5
83.7
69.9
62.4
57. 1
47. 1
64. 5
52. 8
51. 5
134. 7
100. 2
83. 8
65. 0
C0?
2431
1330
1013
787
670
590
583
784
627
532
1528
1149
1006
879
5216 KG
NOX
2. 70
2. 11
1.76
1. 63
2.37
3.46
6. 07
2.34
2. 78
3. 60
5.99
6. 12
7. 73
8. 84
Fuel*
106. 28
63. 14
48.80
38.32
32. 82
29. 08
28. 10
37. 81
30.30
26. 25
75.53
56.70
49.36
42.35
HALF LOAD - 12473 KG
HC
2.28
4. 13
3.61
3. 06
2.91
3. 11
3.70
9.51
3.04
3.26
18.44
14. 20
11.34
9. 06
CO
57.9
110.9
93. 1
71.0
60. 0
59.7
65. 7
69. 1
46. 7
60.0
190. 6
124.4
115. 7
102. 9
C02
2565
1454
1047
772
713
674
775
875
718
653
1838
1309
1305
1083
NOX
3.51
2. 73
2. 18
1.99
3.80
6.72
12.02
6. 02
6.27
5.73
9.60
9. 60
12.95
10. 71
Fuel*
112.
69.
50.
37.
34.
32.
37.
42.
33.
32.
92.
65.
64.
53.
54
37
91
77
50
87
60
85
85
03
82
49
36
80
FULL LOAD -
HC
2.76
3. 23
3. 28
3. 25
3. 08
3. 54
4. 28
10.36
5.37
3. 54
28. 94
17. 18
15. 34
12.02
CO
48. 1
85.3
74.3
69. 1
65. 8
59. 2
87. 0
81. 7
62. 1
58.7
213.3
166.9
171. 1
180. 7
C02
2292
1138
997
832
751
783
830
950
764
767
1685
1487
1458
1213
18370 KG
NOX
2. 55
1. 94
2. 04
2.30
4. 83
9. 28
12. 07
8. 07
7. 42
9.36
8. 85
11.32
14. 53
11. 26
Fuel*
100.42
54. 18
47. 50
40. 17
36.51
37. 50
41. 44
46.94
37. 13
36.78
89. 25
76.24
75. 05
64.87
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
**50 mph at Full Load and 53 mph at Half Load
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
o
APPENDIX C-ll (Cont'd.)
TABLE 11-2. TRUCK Oil SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1974 Chevrolet D3GAS 6. 00 Litre V-8 GVW 18598 KG Project 11-4 1 33
Tost
Dose.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS**
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY LOAD - 5216 KG
1
1.
0.
1.
1.
1.
2.
2.
3.
1.
1.
2.
2.
2.
3.
3.
1C
02
31
07
41
61
18
83
66
62
91
83
08
99
77
55
CO
13.5
6.7
26.4
34.3
37. 7
50.7
61.5
69.8
35.5
43. 1
56.8
18.8
26.7
33.2
34. 1
CO2
105
332
364
415
425
544
636
864
432
512
587
213
306
399
461
NOX
0. 04
0. 37
0. 58
0.72
0. 88
1.92
3. 73
9. 00
1.29
2. 27
3.97
0.83
1.63
3.06
4.64
Fuel*
40.
108.
129.
149.
154.
199.
234.
310.
155.
184.
216.
78.
112.
146.
166.
86
44
05
38
33
09
09
87
58
83
27
60
88
05
03
HALF LOAD - :
HC
1.34
0.31
1. 13
1.48
1.65
2.36
3.35
5.27
5.24
2.52
3. 47
2.49
3.67
4.33
4.56
3.64
3.55
5. 10
4.87
CO
11.9
7.9
30. 4
38.2
38.3
48.7
64.3
93.6
38. 1
38.8
63.9
25.8
32.2
44. 2
51.8
30.2
33.7
77.8
103.4
C°2
100
351
398
430
416
579
726
1104
482
597
696
248
339
499
545
382
391
925
964
12473 KG
NOX
0.04
0.48
0. 75
0.89
1. 07
3.09
7. 23
17. 13
3.32
5. 21
6. 10
1.30
2.48
4.95
5.39
2.73
2.32
15.28
12. 22
Fuel*
38.
115.
141.
155.
152.
209.
264.
399.
176.
210.
254.
93.
126.
183.
202.
139.
143.
335.
360.
76
02
78
95
00
11
34
96
29
11
68
61
50
66
27
00
59
60
13
FULL LOAD - 1
HC
2. 32
0.38
0. 88
1. 34
1. 75
2. 50
3.81
5.79
5.67
4.40
3.88
3.77
4.36
5.41
5.71
CO
17. 1
6.6
23. 3
30. 5
37. 2
53. 5
63.8
117. 6
44.7
50.9
64.3
27.8
42.4
60.3
85.9
C02
90
313
311
409
448
610
844
1122
519
626
840
219
378
514
576
1.8370 KG
NOX
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
3.
10.
16.
4.
6.
10.
1.
2.
5.
5.
04
35
53
84
24
92
00
31
41
08
26
15
87
13
35
Fviel*
39. 17
102. 54
110. 55
145. 50
161. 67
221.47
301. 62
418. 18
191. 68
227. 19
300.93
86.75
144.49
197. 64
230. 10
*Fuel Consumption in Grams/Minute
**50 mph at Full Load and 53 mph at Half Load
9-FTJ1 - Nine-Mode Federal Test Procedure
9-WOT - Wide Open Throttle at 2000 RPM
-------
o
APPENDIX C-ll (Cont'd.)
TABLE 11-4. TRUCK Oil SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
1974 Chevrolet D3GAS 6. 00 Litre V-8 GVW 18598 KG Project 11-4 133
EMPTY LOAD-521 6 KG
HALF LOAD - 12473 KG
FULL LOAD - 18370 KG
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS*
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
Man.
RPM
650
1900
2300
2375
2300
2550
2500
3000
Vac.
16.
17.
18.
17.
17.
16.
13.
11.
3
6
2
7
2
1
5
0
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Period
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
81
82
86
91
92
93
94
42.
72.
168.
0
0
0
51
52
56
61
62
63
64
RPM
650
1950
2350
2400
2250
2450
2500
2800
Man.
Vac.
16.3
17. 5
18.0
17.6
16.8
14.5
11.0
5.3
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Period
42.
72.
168.
0
0
0
21
22
26
31
32
33
34
Man.
RPM
680
1850
2300
2350
2300
2500
2450
2650
Vac.
16.
17.
17.
17.
16.
13.
9.
6.
5
5
8
5
5
5
0
0
Period
42.
72.
168.
0
0
0
-------
o
•ti-
er^
APPENDIX C-12
TABLF 12-1. TRUCK 012 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMFTRE
1972 Ford TTGAS 7.82 Litre V-8 GVW 20412 KG Project 11-4133
Ti-st
D r- s r .
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS**
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
22. 36
12.99
8.34
6. 72
6. 33
5. 75
7. 74
16. 09
6. 44
5.91
34. 88
27. 11
24. 75
18. 22
CO
786. 2
449. 3
273. 6
209. 3
172. 7
138. 2
323.3
203. 5
161. 8
143. 2
491. 7
359. 0
342. 2
315. 8
co?.
2122
1387
758
603
723
754
839
685
769
759
1211
990
909
891
. 7257 KG
NOX
1. 72
1. 55
0. 71
0. 78
3. 01
6. 07
1.96
2. 28
4. 75
6. 02
3. 80
3. 04
2.97
3. 16
Fuel*
144. 86
90. 17
51.30
40. 28
42.88
41.82
57.95
44. 62
44. 11
42.38
88.51
69.29
64.46
61.06
HALF LOAD - 12473 KG
HC
23.39
13.69
8.87
7. 24
6.43
6.04
7.89
24.90
8.50
6. 19
35.00
29.01
25. 14
20.06
CO
870.3
498.3
313. 5
250. 2
175. 2
130.0
369. 2
231. 2
222. 3
151. 7
530. 1
470. 4
464. 5
421.3
C02
2214
1399
757
626
778
814
906
754
786
822
1375
1113
1059
956
NOX
3.01
2.38
0. 75
0.94
4.09
8. 15
2.48
3.46
3.99
5.98
3.31
3. 16
3.23
2.90
Fuel*
154.
94.
53.
44.
45.
43.
63.
50.
49.
45.
98.
82.
78.
71.
48
05
99
02
38
86
87
57
12
62
00
15
97
05
FULL LOAD - 18370 KG
HC
22. 65
12. 67
8. 75
7. 22
6. 66
6.76
9. 20
29. 28
12. 60
7.36
38. 84
30. 73
26.50
20.91
CO
770. 3
425. 2
293.0
231. 6
173. 0
183.3
389.4
319. 8
273. 1
201. 7
617. 7
526. 0
510.9
463. 8
CO2
1902
1253
706
638
822
898
866
829
822
890
1647
1274
1216
1117
NOX
1. 19
1. 2°
0. 58
0. 89
4. 68
6.86
1.82
2.91
3. 21
7.47
3. 51
3. 59
3. 68
3. 58
Fuel*
134. 57
82. 89
50.45
43. 29
47. 11
51.03
63.67
60. 18
54.58
52.01
115.82
92.88
88.86
80.82
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
**48 mph at Full Load and 53 mph at Half Load
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
o
APPENDIX C-l 2 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 12-2. TRUCK 012 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1972 Ford TTGAS 7.82LitreV-8 GVW 20412 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS**
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY LOAD - 7257 KG
HC
1. 11
3. 23
3.75
3. 49
3.73
5. 19
6. 19
11. 58
8. 92
5.32
6.45
4. 86
7.48
9.76
9. 74
CO
37. 6
113. 7
129. 8
114. 5
116. 2
141. 6
148.9
483. 7
112. 8
133. 5
156. 1
68.5
99. 1
134. 9
168. 9
C02
87
307
401
317
335
593
812
1255
380
635
828
169
273
358
476
NOX
0. 03
0. 25
0. 45
0. 30
0. 43
2.47
6. 54
2. 94
1. 26
3.92
6. 56
0.53
0. 84
1. 17
1.69
Fuel*
47.
156.
194.
160.
166.
262.
336.
647.
184.
271.
345.
92.
142.
189.
243.
33
49
50
23
95
50
30
48
61
71
01
02
76
74
78
HALF LOAD - 1
HC
1. 12
3. 38
3.97
3.71
4. 02
5. 28
6.51
11. 12
13. 72
6.98
6.74
4.83
7.94
9.79
10. 29
6.99
7. 33
11.89
12. 34
CO
41.0
125. 8
144. 3
131. 3
138. 8
143. 8
140. 1
520. 2
127.4
182. 6
165. 1
73. 2
128.8
180. 9
216. 1
105.7
91.5
466. 7
490.6
C02
82
320
405
317
347
638
878
1277
416
646
894
190
305
412
490
412
415
985
994
2473 KG
NOX
0. 04
0.43
0. 69
0. 31
0. 52
3.36
8. 79
3. 50
1.90
3. 28
6. 50
0.46
0.86
1. 26
1. 49
2. 12
2. 14
3.30
2.79
Fuel*
47.
166.
203.
168.
182.
278.
352.
671.
207.
301.
370.
100.
167.
229.
272.
189.
183.
554.
569.
39
74
37
77
30
00
98
88
98
30
76
96
92
58
04
25
62
14
20
FULL LOAD - 18370 KG
HC
1.
3.
3.
3.
3.
5.
7.
12.
16.
10.
7.
5.
7.
9.
9.
38
28
68
67
89
35
33
06
00
23
99
21
69
83
99
CO
32.3
111. 6
123. 6
122.8
124. 8
139. 1
198.9
510.2
174. 7
221. 8
218.8
82.9
131. 6
189.4
221. 5
C02
87
275
365
296
344
661
975
1134
453
668
966
221
319
451
534
NOX
0.04
0. 17
0.38
0. 24
0.48
3.76
7. 44
2.38
1.59
2.61
8. 10
0.47
0.90
1.36
1.71
Fuel*
44. 88
145.49
180. 00
157. 83
174. 21
282. 95
413.42
622. 89
245.47
330. 94
421. 18
116. 04
173. 54
246. 01
288. 16
*Fuel Consumption in Grams/Minute
**48 mph at Full Load and 53 mph at Half Load
9-FTP - Nine-Mode Federal Test Procedure
9-WOT - Wide Open Throttle at 2000 R PM
-------
APPENDIX C-12 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 12-3. TRUCK 012 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1972 Ford TTGAS 7. 82 Litre V-8 GVW 20412 KG Project 11-4133
Tost
Dose.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS*
20±5
30±5
n 40±2
1
00 05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY LOAD - 7257
HC
23.37
20.67
19.29
21.78
22.34
19-78
18.41
17.89
48.30
19.57
18. 68
52.78
52.41
51.42
39.96
CO
794. 6
726.9
667.4
714. 3
695.8
539. 5
442. 6
747. 1
610. 8
491. 1
452.4
744.0
694.0
711. 0
692. 8
CO2
1847
1962
2060
1978
2005
2259
2416
1939
2057
2336
2399
1833
1913
1889
1954
KG
NOX
0. 66
1.59
2.30
1. 86
2.59
9.39
19. 44
4. 53
6.84
14.44
19.02
5. 74
5.88
6. 18
6.94
HALF LOAD - 12473 KG
HC
23.66
20.28
19.50
22.01
22.03
18.98
18.45
16.55
65.96
23. 18
18. 17
47. 84
47. 29
42. 64
37.82
36.91
39.93
21.45
21.69
CO
864.4
754. 6
709. 6
777. 7
761.3
517. 2
397. 0
774. 2
612.4
606. 1
445. 4
724.6
767. 0
787. 9
794.3
558.4
498.2
842. 1
861.9
C02
1736
1919
1993
1878
1903
2297
2487
1900
1998
2144
2412
1879
1814
1796
1802
2175
2260
1778
1746
NOX
0.90
2.61
3.39
1.86
2.87
12.09
24.90
5.20
9. 15
10.89
17.54
4. 52
5. 15
5.47
5.47
11.23
11.66
5.96
4.90
FULL LOAD -
HC
30. 67
22. 54
20.47
23. 23
22.33
18.92
17. 74
19.36
65. 16
30.93
18.96
44.92
44.31
39.94
34.66
CO
719. 2
766.7
686.9
777.9
716. 5
491. 8
481. 1
819. 1
711.8
670.2
519.5
714.4
758.5
770.0
768.6
- 18370 KG
CO2
1942
1893
2025
1874
1973
2337
2357
1821
1844
2018
2293
1905
1837
1833
1852
NOX
0.94
1. 18
2. 09
1.53
2.75
13.30
18.01
3.82
6.48
7.89
19. 24
4.06
5. 18
5.54
5.93
*48 mph at Full Load and 53 mph at Half Load
-------
O
TABLE 12-4.
1972 Ford TTGAS
APPENDIX C-12 (Cont'd.)
TRUCK 012 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
7.82LitreV-8 GVW 20412 KG Project 11-4133
EMPTY LOAD-7257 KG
HALF LOAD - 12473 KG
FULL LOAD- 18370 KG
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS*
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
RPM
615
2350
2500
2050
2025
2500
2450
2900
Man.
Vac.
20.0
20. 5
20.0
19.5
18.8
16.6
12.4
5.0
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Period
20±5
30±5
40±5
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
81
82
86
91
92
93
94
36.
60.
134.
0
0
0
51
52
56
61
62
63
64
Man.
RPM
630
2425
2600
2150
2000
2550
2500
2800
Vac.
20.
20.
19.
19.
18.
15.
11.
3.
0
3
7
5
4
7
2
0
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Period
36.
60.
134.
0
0
0
21
22
26
31
32
33
34
Man.
RPM
625
2300
2500
2050
2000
2500
2450
2450
Vac.
20.
20.
20.
19.
18.
15.
9.
2.
0
5
0
5
4
3
4
0
Period
36.
60.
134.
0
0
0
*48 mph at Full Load and 53 mph at Half Load
-------
o
Ol
o
APPENDIX C-13
TABLE 13-1. TRUCK 013 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
1974 CMC TTGAS 7. 00 Litre V-8 GVW 20412 KG Project 11-4 133
T-st
Hr-sc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS**
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD -
nc
•1.61
2. 81
2. 53
2. 35
1. 87
3.00
2. 81
6. 24
1.84
2. 17
16. 67
13. 01
13. 82
10. 81
CO
103. 4
63.8
59.9
50. 5
40.9
56.7
41. 5
31.6
18. 8
27.0
191.4
122.6
148.7
159.0
C02
3077
1788
1352
1053
948
808
874
1141
880
847
1707
1317
1078
1046
7257 KG
NOv
5. 18
3.94
4. 15
4.47
7.06
10.45
20. 23
11.06
9. 56
12.07
8.57
10.93
9. 44
8.52
Fuel*
137. 51
80. 19
61.43
48. 15
43.01
38.30
40.08
51. 15
38. 69
37.86
87. 10
65.54
57.29
56.21
HALF LOAD - 12473 KG
HC
3.91
1.87
1.78
1.77
2.00
2.49
5.05
5.75
2.30
2.40
22.53
17.02
16.64
12.94
CO
101.7
56. 2
50.9
43.0
40.9
33. 2
234.0
60. 2
37.6
30.9
201. 7
212.5
260.3
246.5
_COz
3220
1860
1464
1112
1000
910
879
1016
803
835
1751
1321
1224
1150
NOX
5.94
4. 18
5. 17
5.26
8.06
15.32
9. 18
7.26
7.64
12.71
11.79
10.81
10.47
11. 23
Fuel*
143.34
82. 59
65.49
50. 07
45.24
40.99
53.38
47.71
36.75
37. 64
90.39
72.23
71.25
66.72
FULL LOAD - 18370 KG
HC
6.32
3. 07
3. 08
2. 57
2.38
2.64
6.08
18. 11
9. 83
2. 16
24. 24
21.39
18.73
14.73
CO
135. 0
69.3
68. 2
52.3
42.2
29.3
284.3
190.2
141.8
29. 0
267.4
358.3
345.4
358.9
COg
2881
1824
1407
1198
1083
1069
853
1262
917
1073
1895
1632
1360
1248
NOX
4. 66
4. 03
5. 01
6. 07
9. 54
19. 25
5.66
13. 20
10. 16
24. 27
12.09
11.48
10. 24
9. 13
Fuel*
131. 54
82. 11
64.40
54.45
48.88
47.47
55.72
68.37
49.48
47.57
101. 10
95.62
82.91
78.56
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
**50 mph at Full Load
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
o
APPENDIX C-13 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 13-2. TRUCK 013 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1974 CMC TTGAS 7. 00 Litre V-8 GVW 20412 KG Project 11-4 133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS **
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
FMPTY LOAD - 7257 KG
HC
1.55
0. 63
0.75
1.02
1. 27
1.51
3. 21
4. 14
3.37
1.47
2.31
2. 24
3. 60
5.46
5. 74
CO
23. 0
14. 1
16.9
24. 1
27. 2
32.9
60.6
61. 2
17. 1
15. 1
28. 8
25.7
33.9
58.7
84.4
CO2
95
421
475
544
567
762
863
1288
616
706
904
229
364
426
556
NOX
0. 03
0. 71
1. 05
1. 67
2. 41
5. 68
11. 17
29.82
5. 98
7.67
12. 89
1. 15
3. 02
3. 73
4.53
Fuel*
42.99
140.42
158. 96
184. 50
193. 77
258. 3 1
305. 68
440. 95
206. 32
23 1. 75
301. 85
87. 31
135. 27
168.93
222.90
HALF LOAD - 12473 KG
HC
1.82
0.53
0. 50
0. 72
0.95
1.61
2.66
7.43
3. 10
1.86
2.63
3.05
4.66
6.54
6. 90
3.73
3.84
7. 16
7.20
CO
21.7
13.9
14. 9
20. 5
23. 2
32. 9
35.4
344. 9
32.4
30. 5
33.9
27. 3
58. 2
102.2
131.5
34.4
36.2
335.8
358. 5
C0?.
90
439
493
589
599
804
971
1296
548
651
916
237
362
481
614
425
429
925
951
NOX
0. 03
0.81
1. 11
2. 08
2.83
6.48
16.35
13. 52
3.92
6. 19
13.95
1. 60
2.96
4. 11
5.99
3.82
4.02
5. 24
4. 27
Fuel*
40.96
146. 00
163. 57
196.69
201.33
271. 72
326. 62
587. 23
192. 15
222.35
308. 41
91.41
147.64
208. 91
265. 70
154.86
157. 28
465.52
485. 15
FULL LOAD - 18370 KG
HC
1. 83
0.87
0. 82
1. 24
1. 38
1. 88
2.82
7.99
9.73
7.84
2.35
3.25
5.77
7. 06
7.41
CO
20.3
18. 5
18.4
27.4
28.2
33.3
31.3
373.5
102.2
113. 0
31.5
35.9
96.6
130. 2
180. 5
C02
93
394
484
566
645
855
1144
1120
678
731
1164
254
440
512
628
NOX
0. 05
0. 64
1. 07
2. 02
3. 27
7. 53
20. 60
7.44
7.09
8. 10
26. 33
1. 62
3. 09
3.86
4.59
Fuel*
41. 17
134. 43
162. 75
193. 40
218. 96
288. 09
379. 21
546. 64
274. 18
294.45
385. 30
101. 33
192.47
233. 23
295. 02
*Fuel Consumption in Gram-s/Minute
**50 mph at Full Load
9-FTP - Nine-Mode Federal Test Procedure
9-WOT - Wide Open Throttle at 2000 RPM
-------
o
APPENDIX C-13 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 13-3. TRUCK 013 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1974 CMC TTGAS 7.00 Litre V-8 GVW 20412 KG Project 11-4133
Tost
Dose.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS*
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY LOAD - 7257
HC
36. 12
4.49
4.70
5. 51
6.55
5.83
10.50
9.38
16.34
6.36
7.66
25.63
26.60
32.30
25. 76
CO
535. 1
100. 7
106. 6
130.6
140. 5
127. 3
198. 3
138. 8
82.8
65. 0
95. 5
294. 4
250.5
347. 7
378.8
C02
2214
2997
2987
2947
2928
2951
2824
2922
2987
3047
2995
2626
2692
2521
2493
KG
NOX
0. 73
5. 04
6. 58
9.06
10.44
21.97
36. 54
67.62
28.97
33. 09
42. 69
13. 18
22.35
22.07
20.30
HALF LOAD
HC
44. 33
3.66
3. 04
3.65
4.74
5.93
8. 14
12.66
16. 15
8.37
8.52
33.38
31.56
31.29
25.98
24.08
24.40
15.38
14.84
CO
530. 5
95. 1
91. 1
104. 1
115. 1
121. 0
108. 5
587. 3
168.9
137. 2
109.9
298.8
394. 0
489. 3
494. 9
222. 2
230. 1
721.3
739. 0
- 12473 KG
CO?
2195
3008
3017
2994
2974
2960
2973
2207
2853
2927
2970
2594
2450
2301
2309
2744
2731
1987
1961
NOX
0. 74
5. 55
6.78
10. 57
14. 08
23.85
50. 07
23. 03
20.38
27.83
45. 23
17.46
20.04
19.69
22.54
24.66
25.53
11.27
8.81
FULL LOAD
HC
44. 51
6. 44
5.01
6. 40
6.32
6.52
7. 44
14. 62
35.48
26. 61
6. 09
32. 11
29.96
30. 26
25. 12
CO
492.0
137.5
113.0
141. 9
128.6
115.7
82.7
683. 3
372. 6
383.9
81.6
354.2
501.9
558.0
611.9
- 18370
coz
2255
2933
2976
2926
2947
2967
3016
2049
2471
2482
3022
2511
2286
2197
2128
KG
NOX
1. 28
4. 74
6. 58
10.42
14. 92
26. 14
54. 31
13. 62
25.85
27. 50
68.34
16.02
16. 08
16. 54
15.56
*50 mph at Full Load
-------
o
TABLE 13-4.
1974 CMC TTGAS
APPENDIX C-13 (Cont'd.)
TRUCK 013 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
7.00 Litre V-8 GVW 20412 KG Project 11-4133
EMPTY LOAD - 7257 KG
HALF LOAD - 12473 KG
FULI LOAD - 18370 KG
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS*
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
Man.
RPM
680
2300
2475
2725
2775
3000
2850
2850
Vac.
18.
18.
18.
18.
17.
15.
13.
6.
5
9
6
3
9
6
2
0
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Period
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
81
82
86
91
92
93
94
28.
50.
88.
0
0
0
51
52
56
61
62
63
64
RPM
650
2300
2500
2750
2790
3000
2850
2850
Man.
Vac.
18. 0
18. 7
18. 2
17.8
17. 3
15. 7
11. 5
3. 5
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Period
28.
50.
88.
0
0
0
21
22
26
31
32
33
34
Man.
RPM
650
2300
2500
2750
2790
3000
2850
2550
Vac.
18.
19.
18.
18.
17.
14.
9.
2.
0
0
5
0
0
5
7
0
Period
28.
50.
88.
0
0
0
#50 mph at Full Load
-------
o
TABLE 14-1.
1969 Ford TTGAS
APPENDIX C-14
TRUCK 014 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
6.41 Litre V-8 GVW 19051 KG Project 11-4133
T.-st
Dr-KC.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS**
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EM
HC
-
5. 19
2. 78
1.90
1.52
0. 58
0.02
2.97
3. 54
0. 73
0. 30
45. 50
27. 57
26.36
17. 25
PTY LOAD - 7257 KG
CO
t
-
341. 1
188. 7
126. 1
97.3
57. 1
24.9
156. 7
105. 7
58. 7
31. 3
463. 2
323. 6
284.9
283.4
CO?
-
3552
2050
1331
1031
890
985
714
1173
871
903
1824
1355
1096
921
NOX
_
3. 93
2. 75
1. 94
1.88
2.48
2. 08
3. 11
1. 83
1. 63
1.85
3.39
2.38
2. 18
1.93
Fuel*
_
173. 44
99.55
64. 86
50. 23
41. 50
43. 29
40.99
57. 07
40. 81
40. 28
113.92
82.45
68.75
60.07
HALF LOAD - 12473 KG
HC
_
5. 3 1
2.69
2. 10
1.65
0.67
0.23
6. 18
11.01
2. 75
1. 17
44.41
35. 19
28.89
23.99
CO
_
313. 2
174.4
121. 9
90.7
59.0
75.8
333.3
161. 6
99.5
68.3
471. 7
394.3
355. 5
354.4
C02
-
3548
2122
1308
1055
954
1170
720
1115
820
1000
1828
1447
1234
1122
NOx
„
4. 62
3.02
2. 20
2. 19
2.08
4. 92
1.67
3. 13
2.82
3. 23
3.67
3.02
3.07
2.84
Fuel*
_
171.46
101. 60
63. 64
50. 85
44. 33
54. 50
53.40
59.32
41. 62
46. 95
114. 54
92. 03
79. 61
74. 16
FULL LOAD - 18370 KG
HC
_
6.27
3. 89
3. 25
2.37
0.96
1.99
6.84
12. 10
6.77
3. 68
48.87
32. 52
30. 10
23. 54
CO
_
313.4
195. 6
126.4
91. 8
49. 0
125.9
359. 7
280.5
214. 8
201. 6
567.9
474. 5
464.4
425.4
C02
_
4336
2279
1324
1070
1045
1068
795
1140
845
1048
2041
1678
1471
1277
NOX
_
6.49
3. 64
2. 44
2.61
2. 58
4. 71
1.95
3. 06
2. 20
3.95
4. 22
3. 82
3.79
3. 50
Fuel*
_
204. 88
109. 81
64. 77
51. 64
47.55
53. 77
58.39
68.41
50.90
58. 18
130.50
106.77
97.05
85.38
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
**48 mph at Full Load and 52 mph at Half Load
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
o
APPENDIX C-14 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 14-2. TRUCI<014 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1969 Ford TTGAS 6.41 Litre V-8 GVW 19051 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS**
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY LOAD - 7257
HC
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
4.
1.
0.
0.
6.
7.
10.
9.
88
71
74
73
81
46
02
15
97
60
32
26
72
57
40
CO
39.
46.
50.
48.
51.
44.
25.
219.
58.
48.
33.
63.
90.
114.
154.
7
7
1
7
7
9
7
2
9
2
7
8
6
2
4
coz
107
486
544
514
547
700
1014
999
654
715
971
251
380
439
502
KG
NO^,
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
1.
2.
4.
1.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
1.
03
54
73
75
00
95
14
34
02
34
99
47
67
87
05
Fuel*
56.
177.
197.
187.
199.
243.
332.
428.
237.
250.
323.
117.
172.
205.
244.
40
25
33
14
13
69
82
01
56
21
27
09
41
75
43
HA
HC
4.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
8.
5.
2.
1.
5.
9.
11.
12.
4.
4.
8.
8.
08
77
73
83
86
52
21
05
90
17
24
96
58
01
28
67
64
36
27
LF LOAD - 12473 KG
CO
45. 4
45. 4
47. 4
48. 0
47. 5
45. 9
71.9
434. 1
86. 6
78. 6
72. 6
63.3
107. 3
135. 5
181. 3
83.2
85.9
450.4
464. 5
coz
104
514
577
515
552
741
1109
938
598
647
1063
245
394
470
574
373
379
792
817
NOX
0. 04
0. 67
0. 82
0. 86
1. 15
1.61
4. 66
2. 17
1. 68
2. 23
3. 44
0.49
0.82
1. 17
1.45
0.93
0.87
1. 23
1. 27
Fuel*
59.
185.
206.
187.
198.
257.
385.
519.
237.
245.
372.
114.
186.
226.
283.
163.
166.
481.
496.
52
37
29
01
68
18
64
15
36
39
68
72
98
52
29
69
77
58
40
FULL LOAD - 18370 KG
HC
3.
0.
1.
1.
1.
0.
2.
8.
6.
5.
3.
6.
8.
10.
11.
37
91
03
31
29
77
12
31
40
36
84
43
12
81
03
CO
42.
45.
51.
50.
49.
39.
134.
437.
148.
170.
210.
74.
118.
166.
199.
3
3
8
8
9
4
5
0
3
0
4
7
5
7
2
C02
107
627
604
532
581
841
1 141
966
603
669
1094
269
419
528
598
NOX
0. 06
0.94
0.97
0.98
1.42
2. 08
5. 03
2.36
1.62
1. 74
4. 12
0. 56
0.95
1.36
1. 64
Fuel*
58. 15
221.33
217.30
194. 37
209.34
285. 59
428. 87
529. 60
270. 15
300. 69
453. 29
128. 24
199.03
260. 16
298. 60
*Fuel Consumption in Grams/Minute
**48 mph at Full Load and 52 mph at Half Load
9-FTP - Nine-Mode Federal Test Procedure
9-WOT - Wide Open Throttle at 2000 R PM
-------
n
APPENDIX C-14 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 14-3. TRUCK 014 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1969 Ford TTGAS 6.41 Litre V-8 GVW 19051 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Ursr.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS*
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY LOAD - 7257
1IC
51. 12
4. 01
3.74
3.92
4.05
1.88
0.07
9.69
8.30
2.38
0.99
53. 50
44. 79
51.35
38.46
CO
704. 7
263. 4
253.9
260.4
259. 5
184.3
77. 2
512. 0
248. 1
192. 6
104. 1
544. 6
525. 8
555. 1
631.8
CO?
1900
2743
2759
2748
2749
2874
3048
2334
2753
2859
3003
2144
2201
2134
2055
KG
NOx
0. 59
3. 04
3.69
4. 02
5. 02
8. 00
6.43
10. 15
4.29
5. 35
6. 15
3.98
3.86
4. 25
4. 30
HALF LOAD
HC
68.52
4. 15
3.55
4.42
4.34
2.01
0. 56
15.51
24.86
8.86
3. 33
51.94
51. 22
48. 61
43.33
28.54
27.80
17.36
16.66
CO
762. 3
244. 7
229.9
256. 5
238. 9
178. 4
186.4
836. 1
364. 8
320. 2
194.9
551. 6
573.9
598. 1
640. 1
508. 3
515. 1
935. 2
935. 8
- 12473
C02
1755
2772
2797
2752
2780
2883
2875
1806
2517
2638
2853
2138
2105
2076
2026
2280
2272
1645
1646
KG
NOX
0. 08
3. ol
3. 98
4. o2
5. 78
D. 27
12. 08
4. 19
7, Oo
9. 07
9. 22
4. 29
4. 40
5. 17
5. 13
5.69
5. 23
2. 56
2. 56
FULL LOAD -
HC
57.87
4. 10
4. 75
6.72
6. 15
2.70
4. 95
15. 68
23.68
17.81
8.48
50. 16
40. 80
41. 54
36.93
CO
728. 2
204.9
238. 5
261.4
238. 2
138.0
313. 5
825. 1
549. 1
565. 3
464. 2
582.9
595. 3
640.9
667.3
. 18370 KG
coz
1842
2834
2780
2737
2776
2944
2661
1823
2231
2225
2413
2095
2105
2031
2004
NOX
1. 03
4. 24
4. 44
5.05
6. 76
7. 27
11.74
4. 46
6. 00
5. 78
9. 08
4. 33
4. 80
5. 24
5.49
*48 mph at Full Load and 52 mph at Half Load.
-------
APPENDIX C-14 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 14-4. TRUCK 014 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
1969 Ford TTGAS 6. 41 Litre V-8 GVW 19051 KG Project 1 1-4133
EMPTY LOAD - 7257 KG
HALF LOAD - 12473 KG
FULL LOAD - 18370 KG
O
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS*
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
RPM
780
2600
2700
2500
2450
2250
2850
2800
Man.
Vac.
17.3
18.0
17. 5
17. 3
16.3
14. 3
9.8
7. 5
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Period
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
81
82
86
91
92
93
94
34. 0
70. 0
132. 0
51
52
56
61
62
63
64
Man.
RPM Vac.
730 17.
2700 18.
2750 17.
2500 17.
2400 16.
2200 12.
2820 8.
2600 3.
Period
34. 0
70.0
132. 0
4
0
5
4
5
0
0
0
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Man.
RPM
720
2650
2725
2550
2450
2250
2850
2450
Vac.
17.
17.
17.
17.
16.
10.
7.
1.
6
5
2
0
0
5
4
5
Period
21
22
26
31
32
33
34
34.0
70. 0
132. 0
*48 mph at Full Load and 52 mph at Half Load
-------
TABLE 15-1.
1974 CMC D3GAS
APPENDIX C-15
TRUCK 015 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
7.00 Litre V-8 GVW 20185 KG Project 11-4133
Tost
OCM .
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
9 40±2
01
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
7. 14
6. 20
5.37
3. 88
3.26
2. 84
2. 73
12. 68
3.84
2.90
34. 27
22.96
23.84
14. 69
CO
191. 6
190. 3
187. 4
123.8
111.1
93.6
71. 1
116. 7
98.3
93. 6
372.8
237.3
248. 5
165.8
C02
2491
1704
1514
938
873
652
686
1012
919
604
1848
1350
1210
984
7257 KG
NOX
2.85
3.26
4. 07
2. 53
3.94
4. 23
7. 70
7.97
8.31
3.86
7.30
7. 23
8. 22
8.80
Fuel-
118.
85.
7 7.
48.
44.
34.
34.
52.
45.
32.
107.
75.
70.
54.
97
46
14
39
71
14
09
22
87
11
43
90
83
58
HALF LOAD - J
HC
1 1. 47
7. 14
6. 24
4. 68
4. 02
3.31
3. 00
15.95
7.94
3. 25
37. 78
26. 13
22. 76
14. 09
CO
420. 0
258. 7
231.9
172. 8
141.4
116. 1
76.6
106. 2
100.6
89. 1
415. 1
333.4
350.5
322. 8
C02
2559
1710
1516
960
921
685
744
1270
1013
741
1962
1501
1384
1098
12473 KG
NOX
2. 55
2. 51
3. 22
1. 82
3. 83
4. 23
9. 78
19.40
12. 28
7.36
8. 60
7. 61
9.37
7. 09
Fuel*
137.
90.
80.
52.
48.
37.
36.
62.
50.
37.
115.
89.
84.
69.
55
40
28
68
83
11
92
86
57
66
54
06
79
73
FULL LOAD - 18370 KG
HC
11.79
7.61
6.31
4.87
3.91
3.66
4. 69
28.26
16.84
3.77
42.81
29.82
30. 71
22.40
CO
311. 5
207.7
201. 6
150.3
123.9
104.3
248.6
494. 1
317. 7
111.3
535.4
475.5
515.8
488.8
C02
2839
1793
1577
1029
1001
807
769
1253
977
789
2183
1642
1545
1193
NOX
3. 61
3. 68
4. 42
3. 00
5. 55
7.36
3.93
5.67
6.33
8.76
8. 68
6.89
8.66
4. 54
} U"l*
142. 24
90. 61
80.86
54. 1 1
51. 06
41. 51
49. 65
89. 53
64. 65
41. 24
133. 54
104. 97
103. 65
85.86
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
o
APPENDIX C-15 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 15-2. TRUCK 015 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1974 CMC D3GAS 7. 00 Litre V-8 GVW 20185 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
1.
1.
1.
2.
2.
2.
3.
4.
7.
3.
3.
4.
6.
9.
7.
47
09
75
24
19
73
11
06
01
11
13
68
13
34
82
CO
29.
29.
53.
78.
69.
93.
102.
105.
64.
79.
100.
51.
63.
97.
88.
<
3
6
3
7
0
4
8
5
5
7
0
3
3
3
C02
92
381
480
633
528
731
713
1021
560
744
650
253
360
474
524
• 7257 KG
NOX
0. 04
0. 44
0.92
1.70
1.42
3.30
4.62
11.45
4.41
6.72
4. 16
1. 00
1.93
3.22
4.68
Fuel*
45,
135.
179.
240.
203.
279.
278.
378.
215.
277.
258.
109.
151.
207.
216.
38
66
82
73
44
31
87
76
57
15
03
62
20
18
89
HALF LOAD - 12473 KG
HC
3. 87
1. 66
2. 01
2. 61
2. 60
3. 30
3. 60
4. 41
8.55
6.42
3.49
5. 05
6.93
8.98
7.43
4. 23
4.21
8. 51
7.96
CO
42. 7
60.9
72.9
97. 0
96. 0
115. 8
126. 1
1 12. 8
56. 9
81.3
95.5
55.5
88.4
138. 2
170. 1
88.7
82.7
559. 1
546.0
C02
84
371
482
634
533
754
744
1095
681
819
795
262
398
546
579
396
402
111
772
NOX
0.01
0.37
0.71
1. 35
1. 01
3. 14
4. 59
14. 40
10.43
9.92
7. 90
1. 15
2. 02
3.70
3.74
1.46
1. 60
0.86
0.88
Fuel*
51.
148.
190.
250.
218.
298.
300.
405.
251.
305.
301.
115.
176.
249.
274.
173.
172.
530.
522.
65
84
21
76
51
65
92
80
51
13
58
41
26
69
36
19
12
75
31
FULL LOAD -
HC
1.
1.
2.
2.
2.
3.
3.
6.
15.
13.
4.
5.
7.
11.
1 1.
58
61
14
64
70
20
98
87
24
60
07
67
59
47
31
CO
28.
42.
58.
84.
83.
101.
113.
363.
266.
256.
120.
70.
121.
192.
246.
2
6
5
3
4
6
4
7
3
6
0
9
0
7
8
C02
119
388
505
659
571
821
877
1126
675
789
851
289
418
577
602
18370
NOX
0. 16
0.49
1. 04
1. 85
1. 66
4. 55
8. 00
5. 75
3. 06
5. 12
9.44
1. 15
1. 75
3. 24
2.29
KG
Fuel*
53. 01
145. 13
190. 48
252. 34
224. 24
312. 55
336. 88
542. 30
360. 31
389. 85
331. 92
132. 00
199. 45
289. 16
323. 66
*Fuel Consumption in Grams/Minute
9-FTP - Nine-Mode Federal Test Procedure
9-WOT - Wide Open Throttle at 2000 RPM
-------
o
APPENDIX C-15 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 15-3. TRUCK 015 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1974 CMC D3GAS 7.00 Litre V-8 GVW 20185 KG Project 11-4133
Tfst
DrSC.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY LOAD
HC
32. 35
8. 03
9. 72
9.32
10. 74
9. 77
1 1. 14
10. 72
32. 51
11. 22
12. 11
42. 73
40. 53
45.09
36.06
CO
654.9
215. 7
298.3
325. 4
342. 6
332. 9
367. 2
279. 3
299.4
286.9
390.3
464.8
418.8
469.8
406.9
- 7257
co2
2038
2805
2670
2629
2597
2615
2557
2697
2596
2683
2518
2304
2383
2288
2416
KG
NOX
0.85
3. Zl
5. 10
7.07
7.00
11.82
16.58
30.24
20.45
24. 26
16. 11
9. 10
12. 75
15. 54
21.59
HALF LOAD -
HC
74.89
11. 17
10. 58
10.41
1 1. 89
11. 04
1 1. 96
10.87
33. 98
21. 03
11. 57
43. 80
39. 29
35. 95
27. 07
24.44
24.46
16.03
15. 24
CO
827. 3
409.0
383. 3
386.9
439. 4
387.8
418.9
278. 0
226. 2
266.4
316.8
481.2
501.4
553. 6
620. 1
511.9
480. 2
1053.3
1045.3
12473 KG
coz
1632
2491
2534
2529
2441
2525
2473
2698
2706
2684
2635
2274
2257
2186
2109
2288
2337
1464
1479
NOX
0. 16
2.49
3. 71
5.38
4. 62
10. 51
15. 25
35. 50
41.41
32. 53
26. 19
9.97
11.44
14.80
13.62
8.41
9.27
1.63
1.68
FULL LOAD -
HC
29.79
11. 10
11. 25
10.45
12.06
10. 25
11.80
12.66
42. 28
34. 90
12. 26
42.93
38.05
39.68
34. 95
CO
531. 8
293. 3
307. 1
334. 0
372. 1
325. 0
336. 6
670.7
739. 2
658. 1
361. 5
537.0
606. 7
666.5
762.5
• 18370 KG
C02
2239
2673
2651
2611
2547
2626
2603
2075
1874
2025
2562
2190
2095
1996
1861
NOX
3. 09
3. 40
5.45
7. 32
7.42
14. 55
23. 73
10. 60
8.48
13. 12
28.44
8.71
8.79
11. 19
7. 08
-------
o
APPENDIX C-15 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 15-4. TRUCK 015 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
1974 CMC D3GAS 7.00 Litre V-8 GVW 20185 KG Project 11-4133
EMPTY LOAD- 7257 KG
HALF LOAD- 12473 KG
FULL LOAD- 18370 KG
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
Man.
RPM
700
2200
2650
3200
2550
3175
2500
2750
Vac.
18.
19.
19.
18.
18.
16.
15.
12.
2
8
5
4
8
3
3
0
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Period
20±5
30±5
40±5
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
81
82
86
91
92
93
94
23.
38.
70.
0
0
0
51
52
56
61
62
63
64
RPM
700
2250
2600
3250
2550
3200
2500
2750
Man.
Vac.
18. 2
19. 8
19.3
18.3
18.4
16.3
13.9
9.6
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Period
23.
38.
70.
0
0
0
21
22
26
31
32
33
34
Man.
RPM
725
2275
2600
3225
2575
3200
2550
2800
Vac.
18.
19.
19.
18.
18.
16.
12.
6.
5
7
4
3
5
2
4
0
Period
23.
38.
70.
0
0
0
-------
o
APPENDIX C-16
TABLE 16-1. TRUCK 016 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
1966 Chevrolet D3GAS 6. 00 Litre V-8 GVW 19051 KG Project 11-4 1 33
Tost
Dose.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD - 7257 KG
HC
6.97
4. 21
2.66
1.97
2.76
2.39
2.96
10.79
2.36
2.55
35.69
23.93
20.88
14.07
CO
238.9
137. 9
89.3
52.6
71.8
51. 1
78.0
77. 2
57. 1
55. 6
425.0
309.8
316.7
243. 1
C02
3236
1762
1040
843
752
648
588
789
746
605
1504
950
883
788
NOX
5.82
3.69
2.25
2.32
3.35
5. 52
7.65
4. 65
5. 10
5.05
3.59
2. 54
2.77
3.88
Fuel*
153. 55
84. 18
50.22
39.40
36.91
31. 10
30.44
39.90
35. 64
29.59
96. 57
63.93
61. 12
51.34
HALF LOAD - 12473 KG
HC
6.83
4. 44
2.47
1.84
2. 60
2.61
6. 18
7.90
4.28
2.51
43. 10
29.56
23. 57
15.99
CO
217. 8
143. 5
79. 4
44. 0
62.7
51. 5
328. 2
133. 2
122. 8
49. 6
539. 6
364. 6
374.9
355. 1
C02
3304
1754
1043
858
775
714
550
968
780
701
1484
1115
996
889
NOX
6. 82
3.94
2.52
2.84
4. 24
7. 54
1.04
5.90
5.49
7.46
3. 54
2. 55
2.75
2. 63
Fuel*
155. 01
84. 26
49. 69
39.42
37.24
33.94
45.86
50.83
41. 68
33. 24
104.30
75.28
70. 13
63. 29
FULL LOAD - 18370 KG
HC
8.59
4. 74
2. 94
2.05
2.94
2.83
7.21
20.51
16.84
4. 09
46.90
33. 26
29.91
22.50
CO
253.4
146. 5
86.0
51.7
66.6
53. 5
340.5
338. 1
259.9
126.7
664. 1
499.5
567.2
415.9
co2
3299
1750
1082
889
851
814
691
869
724
724
1624
1253
1169
970
NOX
6.40
3.69
2.74
3. 16
5.94
10.93
2.06
2. 76
3.24
7.09
3.51
3.71
2.43
1.85
Fuel*
157.40
84. 31
51. 81
41. 28
40.78
38. 33
52. 77
61.91
50. 10
39. 55
119. 01
90.59
91. 07
71. 61
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
o
APPENDIX C-16 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 16-2. TRUCK 016 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
19b6 Chevrolet D3GAS 6. 00 Litre V-8 GVW 19051 KG Project 1 1-41 33
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY LOAD - 7257
HC
5.
0.
1.
1.
1.
2.
2.
4.
5.
1.
2.
4.
6.
8.
7.
56
95
12
07
06
20
56
36
83
90
76
83
27
12
31
CO
51.
32.
36.
35.
28.
57.
54.
114.
41.
45.
60.
57.
81.
123.
126.
8
7
5
9
4
2
7
8
7
9
2
5
2
1
3
C02
74
443
467
418
455
599
694
866
426
600
655
203
249
343
410
KG
NOX
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
2.
5.
11.
2.
4.
5.
0.
0.
1.
2.
02
80
98
91
25
67
91
26
52
10
47
49
66
08
02
HALF LOAD - 12473 KG
Fuel*
54.
156.
166.
150.
158.
219.
248.
334.
161.
213.
239.
97.
125.
177.
199.
48
79
58
83
56
50
63
56
07
95
34
50
18
38
18
HC
5. 71
0.93
1. 18
0.99
0.99
2. 09
2. 78
9. 10
4. 25
3.44
2. 73
5. 89
7. 84
9. 28
8.43
5.49
5. 25
9.40
9.92
CO
54.
29.
38.
31.
23.
50.
55.
482.
71.
98.
54.
73.
96.
147.
187.
89.
85.
507.
512.
1
8
1
9
7
4
0
8
7
8
0
7
7
6
2
2
5
7
1
co2
67
452
466
419
462
623
762
809
521
627
762
203
296
392
469
339
335
675
686
NOX
0.
0.
1.
1.
1.
3.
8.
1.
3.
4.
8.
0.
0.
1.
1.
1.
1.
0.
0.
01
93
05
01
53
41
05
53
17
41
11
48
68
08
39
55
59
77
69
Fuel*
53.
158.
167.
149.
158.
223.
270.
503.
204.
250.
269.
106.
149.
206.
249.
156.
153.
474.
480.
62
29
16
09
62
70
45
66
12
35
97
33
08
08
11
71
42
01
18
FULL LOAD - 18370 KG
HC
5.
1.
1.
1.
1.
2.
3.
10.
11.
13.
4.
6.
8.
11.
11.
64
18
26
18
10
37
03
62
04
44
41
22
46
12
20
CO
50. 7
34. 7
38.9
34. 6
27.8
53. 5
57.3
501. 7
182.0
207. 5
136. 5
88.0
127.0
210.9
206.9
C0?
65
452
465
435
479
684
871
1018
468
578
780
215
319
435
483
NOX
0.
0.
0.
1.
1.
4.
11.
3.
1.
2.
7.
0.
0.
0.
0.
01
88
98
10
70
77
70
04 .
49
59
64
46
64
90
92
Fuel*
51. 38
160. 85
167. 11
155. 61
166. 00
244. 74
306. 20
560. 56
248. 79
296. 63
3 13. 08
117. 79
171. 99
252. 91
2-i 6. 01
*Fuel Consumption in Grams/Minute
9-FTP - Nine-Mode Federal Test Procedure
9-WOT - Wide Open Throttle at 2000 R PM
-------
APPENDIX C-16 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 16-3. TRUCK 016 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1966 Chevrolet D3GAS 6. 00 Litre V-8 GVW 19051 KG Proiect 1 1-4 1 33
o
Test
Dose.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY LOAD
HC
102. 09
6. 08
6. 70
7. 10
6. 70
10. 01
10.30
13. 04
36. 22
8.87
11. 52
49. 50
50. 13
45. 75
36. 70
CO
951. 0
208.4
219.4
238. 2
179. 0
260.5
220. 0
343. 2
259.0
214. 5
251.5
589.5
649.0
694.0
634. 1
- 7257
CO2
1352
2823
2803
2773
2867
2728
2791
2589
2648
2804
2738
2086
1991
1934
2057
KG
NOX
0.30
5. 07
5. 87
6.00
7.89
12. 15
23.78
33. 66
15. 62
19. 17
22.84
4. 98
5.31
6. 07
10. 12
HALF
HC
106. 42
5.90
7.05
6. 67
6. 24
9.36
10.30
18. 06
20.82
13.76
10. 11
55.35
52.59
45. 01
33.83
35.06
34. 19
19.84
20. 66
LOAD -
CO
109. 4
188.2
228. 1
214. 1
149.4
225.5
203. 3
958. 7
351. 1
394. 6
199.9
692.9
648.6
716. 0
751.4
568.9
557.4
1071.0
1066.4
12473
C02
1246
2855
2789
2812
2915
2785
2817
1606
2552
2506
2823
1905
1984
1902
1882
2164
2185
1424
1428
KG
NOX
0. 23
5.89
6. 27
6.81
9. 65
15. 25
29.75
3. 03
15.55
17. 63
30.05
4.55
4.54
5.25
5.56
9.87
10.34
1.63
1.45
FULL
HC
109. 73
7.31
7. 54
7. 59
6. 65
9.67
9.89
18. 30
44.38
45.01
13. 87
52.78
49. 18
43.98
42.09
LOAD -
CO
986.3
215. 6
232. 7
222.4
167. 6
218.6
187. 1
864. 2
731. 6
694. 8
429. 1
747.4
738. 5
834. 1
777. 8
18370
coz
1272
2807
2780
2796
2885
2795
2844
1754
1879
1935
2451
1828
1853
1719
1814
KG
NOX
0. 19
5.44
5.87
7. 07
10. 26
19. 51
38. 21
5. 23
5.98
8. 67
24. 00
3.95
3.71
3. 58
3.47
-------
APPENDIX C-16 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 16-4. TRUCK 016 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
1966 Chevrolet D3GAS 6.00LitreV-8 GVW 19051 KG Project 1 1-4 133
EMPTY LOAD - 7257 KG
HALF LOAD- 12473 KG
FULL LOAD- 18370 KG
O
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
Man.
RPM
600
2750
2850
2550
2500
3025
2900
3050
Vac.
16.
19.
18.
18.
17.
17.
15.
10.
0
1
9
6
7
2
0
5
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Period
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
81
82
86
91
92
93
94
34.
52.
92.
0
0
0
51
52
56
61
62
63
64
RPM
600
2800
2900
2550
2500
3025
2950
3050
Man.
Vac.
16.0
19. 0
18. 8
18. 5
17.6
16.8
13.8
7.5
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Period
34.
52.
92.
0
0
0
21
22
26
31
32
33
34
Man.
RPM
600
2750
2850
2550
2500
3025
2900
3050
Vac.
15.
19.
18.
18.
17.
15.
11.
3.
5
0
7
4
2
8
8
5
Period
34.
52.
92.
0
0
0
-------
TABLE 17-1.
1975 IHC D2GAS
APPENDIX C-17
TRUCK 017 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
5.65LitreV-8 GVW7938KG Pr oject 11-4 133
Test
Di-ac.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
ZO SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
9 40±2
cr-
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD - 3855 KG
HC
2. 31
0. 68
0. 41
0. 24
0. 22
0.33
0. 03
6. 62
1. 21
0. 58
6. 00
8. 13
4. 07
4. 05
CO
23. 7
13.5
8.9
6. 6
6. 1
10. 2
10. 8
22.8
12. 8
10. 8
22.2
62.3
33. 7
39.3
co2
2756
1430
805
831
660
587
887
891
623
596
1313
975
855
830
NOX
4. 70
2.47
1. 72
1. 47
1.65
2.77
7.32
4. 11
2.93
3. 21
2.99
3.44
3.79
4.56
Fuel*
118. 35
61.42
34. 67
35. 60
28. 33
25. 53
38. 19
40.07
27. 34
25.96
57. 77
46.43
38.92
38. 22
HALF LOAD - 5896 KG
HC
0.86
0.33
0.23
0. 19
0.22
0.38
0.06
9.36
4.02
0.57
6.04
7.82
3.77
3.87
CO
21. 8
11.0
8. 1
7.0
7. 1
13.4
13.3
46.6
20. 2
11. 6
4. 7
48.9
24.6
36. 0
C02
2733
1473
111
847
675
632
986
916
631
605
1370
1072
902
900
NOX
4. 65
2. 50
1. 67
1.56
1.74
3. 54
8. 25
4.95
3. 13
3. 33
3. 11
4.00
4. 18
4. 61
Fuel*
117. 06
63. 01
33.40
36. 29
29.01
27. 64
42. 57
43. 06
28.55
26.43
59.00
49. 61
40. 26
40.93
FULL LOAD - 77
HC
0. 63
0.33
0. 21
0. 20
0.25
0.45
1. 11
10.91
5.51
0.43
8.21
9. 65
5. 04
5.38
CO
14. 0
11. 3
6.9
5. 5
6.8
13.9
168.4
120.3
50. 6
19.6
37.7
107.9
64.5
81.8
CO2
2714
1453
780
875
699
657
995
1003
695
683
1474
1126
940
968
11 KG
NOX
4. 72
2.58
1.74
1.59
1.98
4. 81
6.34
4. 11
3. 03
4.34
4.36
5.30
4.39
4.40
Fuel*
115. 69
62. Zl
33.43
37. 36
30. 04
28. 73
53.38
51. 82
33.47
30. 21
65.92
56. 03
44. 67
47. 08
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
o
cr-
-j
APPENDIX C-17 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 17-2. TRUCK 017 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1975 IHC D2GAS 5.65 Litre V-8 GVW 7938 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY LOAD - 3855
HC
0. 41
0. 32
0. 18
0. 16
0. 13
0. 18
0. 35
0.05
3.57
0.99
0. 63
0.84
2. 24
1. 68
2. 27
CO
1.6
3. 2
3.6
3.6
3.5
4.9
10. 9
15.8
12.3
10.4
11. 7
3. 1
17. 1
14. 0
22.0
coz
92
377
380
324
449
531
628
1297
482
509
646
185
268
354
465
KG
NOX
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
2.
10.
2.
2.
3.
0.
0.
1.
2.
05
64
66
69
79
32
97
70
22
39
48
42
95
57
56
HALF LOAD - 5896
Fuel*
30.
120.
121.
104.
143.
170.
203.
417.
161.
166.
210.
60.
95.
120.
159.
30
85
74
22
40
16
98
06
65
71
36
73
35
29
90
HC
0. 19
0. 12
0. 09
0. 09
0. 10
0. 18
0.40
0. 09
5. 03
3. 24
0. 62
0.86
2. 16
1.55
2. 18
2.97
2. 90
1.61
1. 77
CO
1. 5
3. 0
2.9
3. 3
3.8
5. 7
14. 4
19. 6
25. 1
16. 3
12. 5
0. 7
13. 5
10. 1
20. 3
15.9
14.5
181. 6
155. 5
KG
CO2 NOX
94
374
391
313
457
542
676
1451
492
509
652
195
297
371
508
356
340
1039
992
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
3.
12.
2.
2.
3.
0.
1.
1.
2.
1.
1.
3.
3.
04
64
66
67
84
40
78
14
66
52
59
44
11
72
60
45
32
92
82
FULL LOAD - 7
Fuel*
30.
119.
124.
100.
146.
174.
220.
467.
172.
171.
212.
62.
102.
123.
172.
123.
117.
419.
391.
61
53
99
32
05
08
80
50
82
75
61
77
57
52
58
28
41
62
86
HC
0. 19
0. 09
0. 09
0.08
0. 11
0. 20
0. 48
1. 64
5.82
4.47
0. 47
1. 15
2.65
2.09
3.01
CO
0.5
1.9
3. 0
2. 8
3.0
5.5
14.8
248.0
64.3
41. 1
21. 1
5.3
29.6
26.7
45.7
C02
88
371
386
314
47 1
563
702
1465
535
564
734
207
309
389
541
711
KG
NOX
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
5.
9.
2.
2.
4.
0.
1.
1.
2.
04
65
68
70
86
59
15
34
19
46
66
61
45
82
46
Fuel*
28. 14
118. 14
123. 21
100.49
150. 09
180.58
229.30
586. 74
206.59
202.86
242. 53
68.98
114.75
138.05
196. 47
*Fuel Consumption in Grams/Minute
9-FTP - Nine-Mode Federal Test Procedure
9-WOT - Wide Open Throttle at 2000 R PM
-------
APPENDIX C-17 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 17-3. TRUCK 017 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1975 IHC D2GAS 5. 65 Litre V-8 GVW 7938 KG Project 11-4133
Tr'bt
D^sc.
no ss
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
O
£ 05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY LOAD
HC
13. 68
2. 62
1.49
1. 57
0. 92
1. 05
1. 72
0. 12
22. 12
5.93
3. 00
13. 90
23.44
14. 00
14. 18
CO
51.4
26.8
29.5
34.4
24.7
29.0
53.5
37.9
76.2
62.6
55.8
51.5
179.8
116.0
137.8
- 3855
CO2
3045
3119
3118
3110
3128
3120
3080
3110
2980
3052
3072
3044
2812
2943
2908
KG
NOX
1.64
5.32
5.39
6.64
5. 54
7.78
14. 55
25.66
13.75
14.36
16. 57
6.94
9.93
13.04
15.99
HALF LOAD
HC
6. 12
0.99
0.70
0.92
0.70
1.04
1. 82
0.20
29. 10
18. 85
2.90
13.71
21. 11
12.53
12. 65
24.07
24.74
3.85
4.53
CO
48.9
24. 9
23.5
32. 6
25.9
32. 7
65. 1
41. 9
145. 1
94. 7
58.6
10. 6
132.0
81.7
117.8
129. 1
123.8
432.8
396.9
- 5896
CO2
3073
3127
3130
3115
3127
3115
3061
3103
2849
2961
3068
3109
2895
3001
2944
2890
2896
2477
2531
KG
NOX
1.34
5.32
5.31
6.71
5.74
8.02
17. 13
25.96
15.39
14.68
16.87
7.06
10.80
13.92
15.09
11.72
11. 21
9.33
9.74
FULL
HC
6. 86
0. 73
0.70
0.84
0.73
1. 10
2. 11
2.80
28. 19
22.05
1.93
16.67
23. 08
15. 12
15.30
LOAD
CO
19.4
16. 2
24.4
27.7
19.9
30.5
64.7
422. 7
311. 1
202. 5
87.0
76.7
258.0
193.4
232.8
-7711 KG
C02
3117
3142
3129
3123
3136
3118
3061
2496
2591
2781
3027
2996
2691
2818
2755
NOX
1. 50
5. 46
5. 56
6.98
5.71
8. 82
22.44
15.92
10. 62
12. 13
19. 23
8.85
12.66
13. 17
12.52
-------
o
TABLE 17-4.
1975 IHC D2GAS
APPENDIX C-17 (Cont'd.)
TRUCK 017 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
5.65 Litre V-8 GVW 7938 KG Project 11-4133
EMPTY LOAD-3855 KG
HALF LOAD - 5896 KG
FULL LOAD - 7711 KG
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
RPM
600
2350
2300
1750
2300
2100
2050
2800
Man.
Vac.
19. 5
20. 0
19. 5
19. 4
17. 8
14. 8
10. 8
6.5
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Period
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
81
82
86
91
92
93
94
17.
33.
66.
0
0
0
51
52
56
61
62
63
64
RPM
600
2350
2300
1750
2300
2100
2050
2800
Man.
Vac.
19. 0
20. 0
19.5
19.3
17.5
14.2
10. 1
4. 5
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Period
17.
33.
66.
0
0
0
21
22
26
31
32
33
34
RPM
620
2350
2300
1750
2300
2125
2050
2800
Man.
Vac.
19.5
20.0
19.5
19.2
17. 5
13.8
9.4
3.0
Period
17.
33.
66.
0
0
0
-------
o
APPENDIX C-17 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 17-5. TRUCK 017 REPEAT SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
1975 IHC D2GAS 5, 65 Litre V-8 GVW 7938 KG Project 11-4 133
Test
Drsc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD - 3835 KG
HC
0.93
0. 48
0.31
0. 24
0. 30
0. 43
0. 06
7.33
0. 79
0. 58
5. 55
7. 58
3.56
3. 71
CO
21.8
11. 1
7. 3
5.3
5.4
9. 0
13. 2
21.4
10.4
9.7
31. 0
55.3
31. 2
42.7
C02
2651
1449
111
832
657
609
814
819
606
587
1335
978
820
814
NOX
4.
2.
1.
1.
1.
3.
6.
3.
2.
2.
2.
3.
3.
4.
66
37
62
41
70
03
39
36
51
81
91
57
61
27
Fuel*
1 13.
62.
33.
35.
28.
26.
35.
37.
26.
25.
59.
46.
37.
37.
62
03
37
56
15
38
29
03
40
51
23
03
20
72
HALF LOAD - 5896 KG
HC
0.67
0.34
0. 22
0. 24
0. 25
0.43
0.06
8.26
3. 19
0. 63
6.22
8.32
3.97
3.65
CO
23.2
13. 2
8.7
7. 1
7.8
11.2
15.2
35.5
19. 1
10.9
20.8
62.3
32.4
42.6
C02
2895
1527
805
882
685
645
909
890
649
611
1393
1002
862
834
NOX
4.40
2.43
1.91
1. 50
1. 77
3. 89
7. 26
4.64
3.36
3.56
3.40
3. 77
4. 07
4. 41
Fuel*
123.
65.
34.
37.
29.
28.
39.
41.
29.
26.
61.
47.
39.
38.
97
44
65
78
50
04
44
09
12
63
08
60
12
54
FULL LOAD - 7711 KG
HC
0.75
0.39
0. 24
0. 20
0. 23
0. 52
1. 00
10. 25
6. 16
0. 59
6. 24
10. 18
4.98
5. 14
CO
26. 5
13. 5
9.9
7.9
8.8
15.5
143.9
111.3
48.5
19. 2
37. 0
106.4
61.4
75.9
COZ
2662
1444
784
886
683
680
934
976
671
672
1423
1089
919
967
N(
5.
2.
1.
1.
1.
5.
5.
3.
2.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
Dx
08
90
84
66
94
15
03
99
90
09
22
45
16
42
Fuel';:
1 14. 38
61.96
33. 82
37.98
29.48
29. 84
49. 15
49.99
32.42
29. 77
63.43
54.46
43. 57
46. 60
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
APPENDIX C-17 (Cont'd. )
TABLE 17-6. TRUCK 017 REPEAT SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1975 IHC D2GAS 5. 65 Litre V-8 GVW 7938 KG Project 11-4 133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY
HC
0. 19
0. 13
0. 13
0. 12
0. 13
0. 24
0.46
0. 08
3. 94
0. 63
0. 63
0.78
2. 10
1.47
2.09
CO
0.4
3. 0
2.9
2.9
2.9
4.4
9.6
19.4
11. 5
8.4
10.4
4.4
15.3
12.9
24. 0
LOAD
CO2
92
363
385
313
449
528
651
1199
440
486
633
188
271
339
457
- 3855
NOX
0. 05
0. 64
0.63
0. 65
0. 76
1.37
3. 24
9.41
1.80
2.01
3.03
0.41
0.99
1.49
2.40
KG
Fuel*
29.43
116.02
122.95
100. 23
143. 12
169. 07
210.60
387.93
148.51
158.20
205. 64
62.27
95. 10
114. 84
158.31
HALF LOAD - 5896 KG
HC
0. 19
0. 09
0.09
0. 09
0. 13
0. 20
0. 46
0.09
4.46
2. 57
0. 67
0.88
2.27
1.63
2. 03
CO
0.6
3. 2
3. 5
3. 5
3.8
6.3
12. 0
22.4
19.2
15.4
11.6
2.9
17. 0
13.3
23.7
COg
94
396
406
324
475
551
689
1340
480
523
653
196
274
354
463
NOX
0. 05
0.60
0. 64
0.77
0. 81
1. 43
4. 16
10. 70
2. 50
2.71
3.81
0.48
1.03
1.67
2.45
Fuel*
30. 01
126.58
129.83
104. 14
152. 04
177. 18
223. 85
433. 84
165. 53
175. 18
212. 38
64. 30
97. 10
119.83
159.98
FULL LOAD - 7711 KG
HC
0. 04
0. 10
0. 10
0. 10
0. 11
0. 18
0.56
1.48
5.55
4.97
0.63
0. 87
2.76
2. 02
2.84
CO
0.3
3.6
3.6
4.0
4. 3
7. 1
16. 6
212. 8
60. 2
39. 1
20.5
5.2
28. 9
24.9
41.9
C02
88
364
383
315
477
549
728
1380
528
541
721
198
296
373
535
NOX
0.05
0. 70
0.77
0.74
0.90
1.56
5.51
7.43
2. 16
2.34
4.38
0. 59
1. 21
1.69
2. 44
Fuel*
27.92
116. 89
122. 82
101. 58
152. 86
177. 05
238. 36
542.47
202. 10
195. 01
238. 17
65.91
110.35
131.90
192.31
*Fuel Consumption in Grams/Minute
-------
APPENDIX C-17 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 17-7. TRUCK 017 REPEAT SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1975 IHC D2GAS 5.65LitreV-8 GVW7938KG Project 11-4133
Trst
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
0 20±5
-la 30±5
^ 40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD - 3855 KG
HC
6.47
1. 10
1. 03
1. 23
0.89
1.43
2. 17
0. 22
26. 53
3.99
3.06
12. 55
22.07
12. 81
13. 18
CO
12.9
25.7
23.9
29.2
20.0
25.8
45.8
50.0
77.4
52.8
50.7
70. 1
160.8
112.3
151.7
CO2
3129
3126
3129
3120
3135
3124
3091
3090
2964
3074
3080
3019
2847
2952
2889
NOX
1.82
5.49
5. 11
6. 50
5.32
8. 11
15. 40
24. 25
12. 14
12.73
14.75
6.58
10.38
13.01
15. 17
HALF LOAD
HC
6.44
0. 72
0.70
0. 85
0.85
1. 15
2.05
0. 20
26.94
14.98
3. 16
13.64
23.40
13.59
12.68
CO
20. 1
25.0
27.0
33.7
25. 1
35.4
53.6
51.6
115. 7
88. 1
54. 8
45.6
175.3
111.0
148. 1
- 5896
CO?
3117
3128
3125
3114
3127
3110
3079
3088
2902
2984
3073
3055
2820
2952
2897
KG
NOX
1. 62
4.75
4.97
7.38
5.32
8.05
18.58
24.66
15. 13
15.48
17.92
7.45
10.60
13.92
15.32
FULL LOAD
HC
1.61
0.87
0. 84
0.96
0.71
1. 04
2.33
2.74
27.47
25.47
2.66
13. 18
25.03
15.30
14.78
CO
10.6
31. 1
29. 2
39. 0
28. 0
39.9
69.5
392. 3
298. 1
200.4
86.3
78. 2
261. 6
188. 7
218. 1
- 7711 KG
CO2
3148
3118
3121
3105
3123
3103
3053
2544
2614
2774
3025
3005
2679
2824
2780
NOX
1.95
5.95
6. 27
7. 30
5.87
8.83
23. 11
13.70
10. 68
12.00
18.38
8.91
10.95
12.79
12. 71
-------
O
i
-------
o
APPENDIX C-18
TABLE 18-1. TRUCK 018 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
1975 Ford Cal. TTGAS 6.38 Litre V-8 GVW 19958 KG Project 11-4133
Tr'St
Ucsr.
no ss
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS**
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
0. 56
0.31
0. 22
0. 17
0. 14
0. 24
0. 61
4. 29
0.47
0. 17
14.84
11.88
10.05
7.43
CO
34.8
20. 5
16.8
13.8
13.9
13.3
45. 2
30.5
20. 2
15.4
159.3
167.3
172.0
144. 9
CO2
3299
2120
1601
1282
961
887
920
903
990
910
2000
1457
1303
1067
7257 KG
NOX
5.34
2.29
2. 18
2. 13
2. 75
5. 16
8. 15
2.86
4.81
5.58
5.88
6.32
5.46
5. 62
Fuel*
141. 82
90.97
68. 81
55. 10
41. 56
38. 39
41. 96
40. 77
43. 22
39. 48
97. 09
74. 27
67. 83
55. 71
HALF LOAD - 12473 KG
HC
0. 82
0.33
0. 24
0. 19
0. 16
0. 28
1. 75
11. 09
1. 33
0.39
15.59
13. 14
12.07
9. 06
CO
34. 8
19. 1
17. 8
13. 8
14. 8
16. 2
141. 7
40. 8
25. 1
21. 5
171.3
198. 2
204. 0
202.9
C02
3328
2046
1636
1316
1005
988
1008
968
988
976
2098
1598
1400
1322
NOX
5. 44
2.61
2.46
2.46
3. 33
7. 18
8.49
5. 57
7. 23
8.68
6.94
5.86
5.73
6.81
Fuel*
143. 04
87.79
70. 34
56. 54
43.46
42. 88
52.23
45. 08
43. 58
42.73
102. 14
82.43
74.33
70.54
FULL LOAD -
HC
1.48
0. 52
0. 17
0. 11
0. 10
0. 23
1.79
15.54
6.78
0.43
16.51
14.94
12. 16
8.55
CO
29. 8
20. 5
16.9
14. 3
18.3
19.9
153.8
121. 2
98.8
26.7
260.3.
292.3
278.6
248.7
CO2
3486
2164
1712
1333
1057
1016
1036
1074
980
1056
2316
1815
1581
1407
18370 KG
NOX
5. 62
2.49
2.66
2.63
4.33
9. 03
5.32
3. 83
5. 29
10.91
9.38
6.77
7. 24
7.69
Fuel*
149. 50
92.89
73. 51
57. 28
45. 88
44. 27
54. 24
55. 50
48. 87
46.45
117.36
98. 11
86.96
77. 10
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
**49 mph at Full Load and 54 mph at Half Load
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
o
APPENDIX C-18 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 18-2. TRUCK 018 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1975 Ford Cal. TTGAS 6.38 Litre V-8 GVW 19958 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS**
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
2.
0.
0.
2.
3.
3.
3.
17
08
08
09
09
11
26
90
39
38
19
05
14
98
98
CO
4. 1
4. 8
5. 4
6.8
7. 4
11. 2
14. 2
66. 5
17. 0
16.3
17. 1
22. 0
44. 3
68. 0
77.6
co2
115
451
562
644
691
773
949
1354
503
799
1010
276
386
516
571
7257 KG
NOX
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
2.
5.
12.
1.
3.
6.
0.
1.
2.
3.
02
73
61
88
15
21
52
00
59
88
19
81
67
16
01
Fuel*
38.
144.
180.
206.
221.
249.
306.
461.
169.
260.
327.
99.
146.
200.
222.
50
82
17
67
74
65
69
26
58
66
36
95
81
42
68
HALF LOAD - 12473 KG
HC
0. 17
0. 11
0.09
0. 10
0. 10
0. 13
0. 30
2. 52
5.88
1.07
0. 42
2. 14
3.45
4. 72
4.65
3.30
3.64
3.24
3. 12
CO
7.
4.
5.
7.
7.
11.
17.
203.
21.
20.
23.
23.
52.
79.
104.
10.
11.
216.
210.
3
8
1
2
4
9
2
7
6
2
3
6
0
7
1
6
3
6
2
coz
117
455
543
657
709
809
1050
1449
513
795
1057
288
419
547
678
422
433
1066
1084
NOX
0.06
0. 74
0. 69
0.99
1.32
2.68
7.63
12. 21
2. 96
5.83
9.40
0.95
1.54
2. 24
3.50
1.72
1.72
2.76
2.89
Fuel*
40.
146.
174.
211.
227.
261.
340.
560.
178.
262.
345.
104.
161.
216.
270.
141.
145.
446.
449.
57
06
01
09
53
27
27
64
62
09
58
84
54
88
30
68
82
99
17
FULL
HC
9.92
0. 20
0. 14
0.07
0.06
0.08
0. 25
2.36
8.55
5.58
0.46
2. 19
3.78
4. 54
4. 14
LOAD - 18370 KG
CO
176.
4.
5.
6.
7.
14.
21.
202.
66.
81.
28.
34.
74.
103.
120.
4
1
4
8
7
7
2
9
7
2
6
6
0
9
5
CO?
2861
477
575
688
718
851
1086
1367
591
805
1133
307
459
590
681
NOX
1. 10
0. 77
0. 66
1. 07
1.42
3.49
9.65
7. 02
2. 1 1
4. 35
11. 70
1. 25
1. 71
2. 70
3. 72
Fuel*
41. 12
152. 65
184. 12
220. 58
230. 54
275. 83
353.40
534. 28
228. 16
299.98
372. 02
116. 34
185. 33
242. 11
278. 83
*Fuel Consumption in Grams/Minute
**49 mph at Full Load and 54 mph at Half Load
9-FTP - Nine-Mode Federal Test Procedure
9-WOT - Wide Open Throttle at 2000 R PM
-------
T.-st
APPENDIX C-18 (Cont'd. )
TABLE 18-3. TRUCK 018 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1975 Ford Cal. TTGAS 6. 38 Litre V-8 GVW 19958 KG Project 11-4 133
EMPTY LOAD - 7257 KG
HALF LOAD - 12473 KG
FULL LOAD - 18370 KG
D.-sr.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS''
20±5
30±5
40±2
O
^ 05 AVG.
^ 10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
9-FTP
9-FTP
9-WOT
9-WOT
HC
4. 45
0. 53
0.46
0.42
0.42
0. 46
0. 85
1.96
14. 09
1. 44
0. 57
20.47
21.42
19.85
17.87
CO
106. 1
32.9
30. 1
32. 8
33. 5
44. 7
46.3
144. 2
100.3
62.7
52. 1
219.8
301.7
339.5
348.3
CO?
2989
3116
3121
3117
3115
3098
3094
2937
2967
3066
3086
2759
2627
2573
2566
NOX
0.47
5. 04
3.37
4. 24
5. 17
8. 86
17.99
26. 02
9.38
14.90
18.91
8. 11
11.39
10.73
13.51
HC
4. 14
0. 76
0. 51
0. 46
0.44
0.48
0.88
4. 50
32. 94
4.08
1. 22
20.44
21.36
21. 75
17.21
23.32
25.00
7. 24
6.94
CO
179. 8
32.6
29. 2
33.9
32. 7
45. 5
50.7
363.3
121. 1
77. 2
67.5
224. 7
322. 0
367.6
385.3
74. 7
77.3
484.5
467.9
CO2
2874
3116
3122
3115
3117
3096
3087
2584
2875
3035
3060
2752
2596
2523
2509
2978
2969
2385
2412
NOX
1.41
5. 09
3.98
4. 68
5.82
10.25
22.43
21.77
16.54
22.23
27. 20
9. 10
9.52
10.33
12.94
12. 14
11.82
6. 17
6.44
HC
0. 41
1. 33
0.74
0.31
0.27
0.30
0. 70
4.42
37.49
18.59
1. 24
18.84
20.39
18. 73
14.85
CO
7. 3
26.7
29.6
30. 8
33. 5
53. 5
60. 1
379. 7
292.4
270.8
76.9
297. 1
399. 1
429. 1
432. 0
coz
118
3123
3121
3120
3116
3084
3073
2559
2591
2685
3045
2643
2478
2436
2443
NOX
0. 05
5.04
3.59
4.85
6. 16
12. 64
27.31
13. 14
9. 24
14.49
31.46
10.71
9.25
11. 15
13. 35
*49 mph at Full Load and 54 mph at Half Load
-------
APPENDIX C-18 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 18-4. TRUCK 018 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
1975 Ford Cal. TTGAS 6. 38 Litre V-8 GVW 19958 KG Project 11-4133
EMPTY LOAD- 7257 KG
HALF LOAD - 12473 KG
FULL LOAD - 18370 KG
O
-j
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS*
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
Man.
RPM
680
2425
2600
2850
2800
2600
2950
2950
Vac.
18.
18.
16.
16.
15.
13.
1 1.
2.
7
2
7
4
6
2
2
8
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Period
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
81
82
86
91
92
93
94
38.0
58. 0
1 12. 0
51
52
56
61
62
63
64
RPM
680
2450
2575
2875
2825
2600
2950
2900
Man.
Vac.
18.7
18. 2
16.7
16.2
15.4
12.6
9.8
0.5
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Period
38. 0
58.0
112. 0
21
22
26
31
32
33
34
Man.
RPM Vac.
670 18.
2450 18.
2600 16.
2900 16.
2825 15.
2600 11.
2950 8.
2600 0.
Period
38. 0
58. 0
112. 0
7
2
5
0
1
9
5
5
#49 mph at Full Load and 54 mph at Half Load
-------
o
I
~J
oo
APPENDIX C-18 (Cont'd.)
TAB1E 18-5. TRUCK 018 REPEAT SUiMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
1975 Ford Cal. TTGAS 6. 38 Litre V-8 GVW 19958 KG Project 11-4 133
Trst
Dose .
no ss
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS**
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD -
MC
2.48
0.58
0. 20
0. 15
0. 10
0. 10
0. 22
3.69
0.33
0. 14
13.03
11. 12
9.93
8.07
CO
40.0
22.9
32.6
13.4
13.3
13. 1
22.3
26.9
19. 0
15. 1
143. 6
153. 2
152.8
163.5
co2
3917
2305
1877
1351
1003
910
946
899
905
900
1980
1446
1273
1129
7257 KG
NOX
5. 11
2.59
1. 52
2.37
2.99
5.29
9. 10
2.79
4. 12
5. 12
5. 18
5.40
4.77
4.87
Fuel*
168. 53
99. 00
81. 53
57.99
43. 27
39. 32
41.48
40. 26
39.56
39. 04
94.96
72. 75
65. 28
59.66
HALF LOAD - 12473 KG
HC
1.95
0. 61
0. 21
0. 16
0. 06
0. 11
1.61
9.51
1. 13
0. 54
10. 81
10.49
9.77
7. 54
CO
34.4
23. 6
18.4
14. 1
14. 5
15.4
146. 1
37.8
20.2
21.3
164.4
218. 8
207.9
202.3
C02
3653
2418
1850
1405
1043
1010
941
944
996
966
2151
1598
1426
1301
NOX
5.59
2. 94
2.81
2.41
3.46
7. 32
10. 74
4. 73
6.88
7.89
6.46
5.31
5. 01
5. 74
Fuel*
156.
103.
79.
60.
45.
43.
49.
43.
43.
42.
103.
83.
75.
69.
93
85
43
33
04
71
68
68
60
31
28
45
37
43
FULL LOAD -
HC
1.35
0.58
0. 21
0. 09
0. 11
0. 17
1.32
15. 23
6.51
0.49
15.61
13.09
10.91
8.03
CO
27. 8
22.3
17. 1
14.8
17.7
17.4
128.0
93.5
95. 6
24. 1
269.4
280.9
265.8
226. 2
C02
3685
2355
1859
1394
1056
1051
1085
1026
1031
1038
2457
1875
1618
1348
18370 KG
NOX
5. 14
2.67
2.79
2.46
3.87
8. 30
7. 11
4. 36
5.87
10. 28
9.48
7. 68
7.56
7. 72
Fui.-1'X
157. 74
101. 08
79. 71
59. 91
45. 83
45. 59
54. 51
51. 60
50. 79
45. 53
123. 82
99.63
87.48
73. 07
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
**50 mph at Full Load and 54 mph at Half Load
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
o
^]
vO
APPENDIX C-18 (Cont'd.)
TABLF 18-6. TRUCK 018 REPEAT SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1975 Ford Cal. TTGAS 6.38 Litre V-8 GVW 19958 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS**
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
0. 37
0.34
0. 15
0. 08
0. 08
0. 08
0. 11
0.33
2. 00
0. 27
0. 15
1.79
3. 06
3.95
4. 32
CO
8. 2
5.5
6. 1
13. 1
7. 2
10. 6
14. 0
32.8
14. 6
15.4
16.3
19.8
42.2
60.8
87. 6
CO?
115
536
612
755
728
799
973
1392
489
737
975
272
398
507
605
7257 KG
NOX
0.05
0.70
0.69
0. 61
1.28
2.38
5.66
13.40
1.52
3.36
5. 55
0.71
1.49
1.90
2.61
Fuel*
40.
172.
196.
244.
233.
257.
314.
455.
163.
240.
316.
97.
149.
194.
238.
79
08
24
85
38
33
11
94
44
61
00
52
49
09
58
HALF LOAD - 12473 KG
HC
0. 30
0. 27
0. 16
0.09
0. 08
0.05
0. 12
2.31
5. 10
0.92
0. 59
1.49
2.88
3.85
3.87
CO
7. 8
4. 7
6.0
7.4
7.6
11.6
16.5
210. 4
20.2
16.5
23. 1
22. 7
60.0
81.9
104. 0
C02
118
500
617
744
757
839
1080
1355
506
812
1050
297
438
562
669
NOX
0. 04
0. 77
0.75
1. 13
1.30
2.78
7.83
15.47
2.53
5.61
8.57
0.89
1.45
1.97
2.95
Fuel*
41.
160.
197.
238.
242.
270.
349.
534.
174.
265.
343.
106.
170.
221.
266.
31
24
92
37
80
51
19
11
69
20
25
37
81
64
52
FULL LOAD - 18370 KG
HC
0.37
0. 19
0. 15
0. 08
0. 05
0. 09
0. 19
1. 75
8.44
5. 20
0.53
2.09
3.33
4. 05
3.89
CO
7. 7
3. 8
5. 9
6.9
8. 0
14. 2
18. 7
169.9
51.8
76.4
25.9
36. 1
71.4
98.8
109. 6
C02
117
504
625
748
751
850
1132
1440
569
823
1112
330
477
601
653
NOX
0. 03
0. 70
0. 71
1. 12
1.32
3. 12
8. 94
9. 44
2.41
4. 69
11. 02
1. 27
1.95
2. 81
3. 74
Fuel*
41. 21
161. 21
200.36
239. 38
241. 10
275. 27
366. 66
540. 25
213. 52
302. 77
364. 34
124. 03
189. 21
242. 72
264. 33
*Fuel Consumption in Grams/Minute
**50 mph at Full Load and 54 mph at Half Load
-------
o
I
o>
o
APPENDIX C-18 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 18-7. TRUCK 018 REPEAT SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1975 Ford Cal. TTGAS 6.38 Litre V-8 GVW 19958 KG Project 11-4133
Tost
Dose.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS*
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD - 7257 KG
HC
9. 12
1.97
0. 78
0.33
0. 34
0. 31
0. 35
0. 71
12. 27
1. 12
0.48
18.38
20.47
20.36
18. 11
CO
200. 6
31. 8
31. 0
53. 5
31.0
41. 2
44. 6
72.0
89.6
64. 2
51.7
202.6
282.0
313.4
367.0
CO?
2825
3113
3118
3084
3119
3104
3098
3054
2990
3065
3087
2793
2661
2612
2535
NOX
1. 19
4. 06
3.51
2.50
5.47
9. 26
18.02
29.38
9. 28
13.96
17.56
7.30
9.94
9.79
10.94
HALF LOAD
HC
7. 18
1. 66
0. 79
0. 36
0.35
0. 18
0.34
4.33
29. 17
3.49
1. 71
14. 03
16. 84
17. 37
14. 54
CO
188. 0
29.4
30. 5
31. 0
31.4
43. 0
47. 3
393.9
115. 8
62.2
67.4
213.3
351. 1
369. 5
390.3
- 12473
CO2
2851
3118
3119
3119
3119
3101
3094
2537
2895
3061
3058
2790
2564
2534
2510
KG
NOX
0.95
4. 77
3. 80
4.74
5.35
10. 28
22.43
28.97
14.50
21. 15
24.97
8.37
8.52
8.91
11.08
FULL LOAD -
HC
8.90
1. 15
0.76
0.35
0. 20
0.31
0.51
3. 25
39.54
17. 18
1.45
16.89
17.60
16.71
14.72
CO
18b. 7
23.6
29.6
28. 8
33. 1
51.6
51. 1
314.4
242. 8
252. 2
71.0
291.4
377. 6
406.9
414. 6
. 18370 KG
coz
2848
3129
3120
3123
3117
3087
3087
2665
2663
2719
3053
2658
2520
2477
2471
XOX
0. 72
4. 36
3. 54
4.69
5. 49
11. 32
24.39
17.48
11.31
15.49
30. 24
10. 25
10. 32
11. 57
14. 16
*50 mph at Full Load and 54 mph at Half Load.
-------
O
00
APPENDIX C-18 (Cont'd. )
TABLE 18-8. TRUCK 018 ALTERNATE DRIVING CYCLE SUMMARY
1975 Ford Cal. TTGAS 6.38LitreV-8 GVW 19958 KG Project 1 1-4133
Test
Desc.
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
CO
CO,
7257 KG
NO
HALF LOAD - 12473 KG
Fuel HC
CO
CO
NOX
FULL LOAD - 18370 KG
Fuel HC CO
C02
NOX
Fuel
Grams /Kilometre
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
11.90
10. 58
9. 22
8. 30
129. 6
147. 5
181.3
195.4
1866
1353
1230
1151
4.04
4. 78
4.53
4. 53
89.
68.
65.
62.
06* 13. 16
38* 9.82
27* 8. 23
72* 7. 39
154. 0
166. 8
189. 2
197. 5
1952
1551
1394
1239
7. 24
6. 02
6.87
6.61
94.46* 12.47 238.8
77.93* 12.09 243.6
72.56* 10.66 269.0
66.45* 9.05 252.9
2131
1748
1649
1429
7. 44
6.90
8.03
8. 01
107. 60*
91. 68*
88. 99*
78. 39*
Grams /Minute
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
1.56
2.88
3. 51
4. 18
17.0
40. 2
69.0
98.4
244
369
468
580
0.53
1.30
1.72
2. 28
86.
139.
185.
235.
99 1.73
07 2. 62
51 3.05
94 3.60
20.2
44. 6
70. 1
96.2
Grams /Kilogram
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
17.90
20.73
18. 93
17.72
194.9
288.9
372. 0
417.3
2806
2650
2525
2458
6. 07
9.37
9.30
9.67
18. 66
16.88
15. 20
14.89
218.4
286. 7
349. 2
398. 0
256
414
517
604
0.95
1. 61
2. 55
3. 22
92.60 1.64 31.4
155.44 3.08 62.0
200.85 3.72 93.8
241.84 4. 17 116.6
280
445
575
659
0.98
1.76
2.80
3.69
105. 50
174. 27
231. 77
269. 78
of Fuel
2767
2665
2572
2497
10. 26
10.35
12. 69
13.33
15.52 297.2
17.66 355.9
16.05 404.8
15.47 432.2
2653
2554
2482
2441
9.26
10.08
12. 09
13.68
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
APPENDIX C-19
GASOLINE TRUCK IDLE CO AND HC
Beckman Model 590 Infrared Vehicle Exhaust Analyzer
Truck
No.
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Engine
318
366
361
345
292
391
392
361
345
478
366
477
427
391
427
366
345
389
Manufacturer
Dodge
Chevrolet
Ford
me
Chevrolet
Ford
IHC
Dodge
IHC
IHC
Chevrolet
Ford
CMC
Ford
CMC
Chevrolet
IHC Cal.
Ford Cal.
CO, percent
4.
5.
5.
0.
0.
0.
6.
6.
3.
2.
2.
2.
2.
4.
3.
5.
0.
1.
6
6
3
7
9
6
3
0
7
9
1
0
2
2
3
4
5
1
HC, ppm Hexane
235
300
360
800
1300
1350
220
1350
150
450
475
130
200
300
185
650
60
65
C-82
-------
APPENDIX C-20. MODIFIED NINE-MODE FTP RESULTS
G rams / Minute
Truck
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Composite Bag Results
Run 1
HC
CO
CO2
NOX
Fuel
HC
CO
CO2
NOX
Fuel
HC
CO
C02
NOX
Fuel
HC
CO
CO2
NOX
Fuel
HC
CO
C02
NOX
Fuel
HC
CO
CO2
NOX
Fuel
HC
CO
CO2
NOX
Fuel
HC
CO
co2
NOX
Fuel
HC
CO
CO2
NOX
Fuel
3
33
324
3
122
4
52
422
3
163
3
24
386
4
137
2
32
346
2
128
2
36
308
1
118
5
26
418
3
150
4
41
452
2
167
6
62
327
2
141
5.
32.
327.
3.
124.
. 34
. 1
.32
. 0
.47
. 0
.
. 02
.4
.00
. 4
. 13
. 0
. 84
. 5
. 17
. 0
.84
.8
. 85
. 2
.14
. 1
.93
. 1
.68
.3
.
.3
. 7
.93
.9
. 4
. 4
37
3
42
6
Run 2
3. 28
33. 2
329.
2.96
123.4
4. 18
52. 0
415.
3.19
161. 1
3. 12
24. 2
379.
4. 32
134. 5
3. 24
27.9
368.
2.85
133.3
2. 74
36. 4
308.
1.95
117. 8
5.51
26.4
432.
4. 03
155. 0
4. 81
48.8
424.
2. 0
162. 7
7.92
62.1
340.
2.6
145. 8
4. 03
27.4
324.
3.37
120.0
Av
3.
33.
326.
3.
123.
4.
52.
418.
3.
162.
3.
24.
383.
4.
136.
3.
30.
368.
2.
131.
2.
36.
308.
1.
118.
5.
26.
425.
4.
153.
4.
45.
438.
2.
165.
7.
62.
333.
2.
144.
4.
29.
326.
3.
122.
g .
3
2
1
3
0
1
1
3
2
1
0
5
8
6
9
3
2
0
7
1
2
4
5
5
7
8
4
Run
3.
37.
348.
3.
131.
4.
50.
430.
2.
165.
3.
24.
402.
4.
142.
2.
35.
384.
2.
141.
2.
37.
311.
1.
119.
5.
26.
424.
4.
152.
4.
41.
466.
2.
172.
8.
66.
352.
2.
152.
5.
29.
337.
3.
126.
Modal Results
1
37
32
6
11
8
25
61
6
86
2
04
02
6
56
0
96
01
27
47
94
60
3
97
8
36
19
92
42
41
82
88
1
60
7
09
86
5
93
4
58
57
7
71
8
Run
3.
42.
343.
2.
132.
4.
53.
437.
3.
168.
3.
22.
388.
4.
136.
3.
28.
396.
2.
142.
2.
37.
300.
2.
116.
5.
26.
426.
4.
153.
4.
50.
443.
2.
169.
8.
61.
352.
3.
150.
4.
29.
331.
3.
123.
2
24
03
6
68
5
12
24
2
20
5
14
17
5
73
7
19
33
6
66
35
75
44
4
06
08
75
24
38
61
29
37
76
5
62
5
41
82
4
02
2
42
95
3
51
8
Avg.
3.3
39.6
346.
2.9
13.2
4. 2
52.0
434.
3.0
167.
3. 1
23. 1
396.
4.6
139.0
3. 1
32.0
391.
2. 5
142.
2.9
37.5
306.
2.0
118.
5.6
26. 2
426.
4.5
153.
4.6
46.3
455.
2.6
171.
8. 2
64.3
352.
3.0
151.
5.0
29.8
334.
3. 6
125.
C-83
-------
APPENDIX C-20 (Cont'd.) MODIFIED NINE-MODE FTP RESULTS
Grams/Minute
Truck
No.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
HC
CO
CO2
NOX
Fuel
HC
CO
CO2
NOX
Fuel
HC
CO
C02
NOX
Fuel
HC
CO
CO2
NOX
Fuel
HC
CO
CO2
NOX
Fuel
HC
CO
CO2
NOX
Fuel
HC
CO
CO2
NOX
Fuel
HC
CO
CO2
NOX
Fuel
HC
CO
COz
NOX
Fuel
Composite Bag
Run 1
4.51
37.2
558.
6.81
199. 1
3.64
30.2
382.
2.73
139.0
6.99
105. 7
412.
2.12
189.3
3.73
34.4
425.
3.82
154.9
4.67
83. 2
373.
0.93
163. 7
4.23
88. 7
396.
1.46
173. 2
5.49
89. 2
339.
1.55
156. 7
2.97
15.9
356
1. 45
123. 3
3.30
10.6
422.
1. 72
141. 7
Run 2
4.58
36.3
564.
6.65
200.6
3.55
33. 7
391.
2.32
143.6
7.33
91.5
415.
2.14
183.6
3.84
36.2
429.
4. 02
157.3
4.64
85.9
379.
0.87
166.8
4. 21
82. 7
402.
1.60
172.1
5.25
85.5
335.
1.59
153.4
2.90
14. 5
340
1.32
117.4
3.64
11. 3
433.
1.72
145.8
Results
Ayg.
4.5
36.8
561.
6.8
200.
3.6
32.0
387.
2. 5
141.
7.2
98.6
414.
2. 1
187.
3.8
35. 3
427.
3.9
156.
4. 7
84.6
376.
0.9
165.
4.2
85. 7
399.
1.5
173.
5.4
87.3
337.
1.6
155.
2.9
15. 2
348
1.4
120.
3. 5
11. 0
428.
1.7
144.
Modal Results
Run 1
5.08
38.41
568.4
7.48
203. 5
3.60
29.29
390.
3.21
141. 2
6.98
101.46
417. 3
2.68
189.
3. 74
34.43
446.6
4.30
161.7
4. 70
77. 26
396.8
0. 92
168.2
4. 05
93.88
414.6
1.83
181.4
5.52
88.35
357. 7
2.12
162.2
3.11
15.95
376.4
1.52
129.8
2.97
7.72
433.
1.82
143. 4
Run 2
4.98
31. 94
570.1
7.10
200. 7
3.28
33.13
392.
2.87
143.4
7. 28
102.65
412.3
2.52
188.2
3. 75
32. 06
443.4
4. 55
159.6
4. 47
82. 86
394.9
0.91
170. 2
4.41
86. 85
424. 1
2. 07
181.3
5.40
90. 14
350. 7
2.16
160.7
3. 18
17. 1
376.6
1.35
130.5
3.29
9.55
425.6
1.81
142. 3
Ayg.
5.0
35.2
569.
7.3
202.
3.4
31.2
391.
3.0
142.
7. 1
102.0
415.
2.6
189.
3.8
33.2
445.
4. 4
161.
4.6
80. 1
396.
0.9
169.
4. 2
90.4
419.
2.0
181.
5.5
89. 2
354.
2.1
161.
3.1
16.5
376
1. 4
130. i
3.1
8.6
429.
i.a
143.
C-84
-------
o
TAHLF
TRUCK 01 TEST i 3-
MODE
1 IDLE
2 ib HG
3 10 HG
4 Ib HG
5 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
« C,T,
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
t Ib HG
5 19 HG
fe Ifa HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
* C,T.
1 IDLE
2 ib HG
3 10 HG
t ib HG
5 19 HG
b 1 b H C,
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
^ C.T,
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
t ib HG
5 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
1 C,T.
AVERAGE
A W C" O A P t-
01 .
7-75
APPENDIX C-21
MASS EMISSION BY M n n i M E r>
nonet 02 GAS 1970
CONCENTRATION CORRECTED ----CALCULATE
HC CO C02 NOX HC CO
83
94
122
b9
q
bb
539
79
) 310
108
94
132
71
14
b9
539
81
1310
103
99
125
b9
11
b9
5 J9
79
L335
108
9b
135
b9
14
bb
539
81
1285
SUM
C i i U _ _ —
b39 ,21
33 1.13
138 1,77
33 1.13
2 ,8h
193 1,13
9534 2.55
192 1,17
1045 ,11
• rvrt f rnv^D
"L'L-UC. U I ' '" "
1831 ,22
24b 1,15
297 1,82
139 i, 15
2 . 8h
8b 1,15
9745 2,58
24b 1,17
llbS ,11
• rvrt f- rnwp
L.TLL.C. ^.. u1*1"
170b ,22
199 1,17
350 i,80
24b 1,13
33 ,8b
192 1,15
9751 2,55
24b 1,19
1
R4
274
84
1
84
119
89
1
1
79
279
89
1
94
119
99
1
r\ c T T C
U O 1 1C
1
89
294
H9
1
94
114
99
Ilb3 ,11 1
•rvri F rnMOn^TTt
™U"LL-t U'-J^fU^-l 'C-
1894 ,22 1
1^2 1,15
244 1,82
8b 1.15
23 ,8b
139 1,15
98bO 2,55
24K 1,19
1222 ,11
rvrt i- rnwp
"LTUUC L'-J^r
(COMPOSITE
^(-r-lJuDnOTTC1
*» V C. " ** U C- O M •-'— — — V. L U "I|~ LJ o 1 1C.
FOUR CYCLE- COMPOSITE -
84
299
89
1
84
109
104
1
n c T T r
i ] o 1 lu
VALUES
WAI 1 If Q
v ft L Ut o
,88 13,8
1,00 ,7
1,30 3.0
,73 ,7
.09 .0
.71 4.1
5,75 205,3
,84 4,1
13,98 22,5
1,15 39,4
1,00 5.3
l.tl b.t
,7b. 3,0
,14 ,0
,73 1,9
5.7S 209,9
,87 5.3
13.98 25,0
1,10 3b, 7
1,05 3,0
1,33 7.5
,73 5,3
.I?1 .7
,'3 4,1
5,75 210,0
.84 5,3'
14,24 25,0
1,15 40,8
1,03 4,1
l.tt 5,2
,73 1.9
.It ,5
.n 3,0
5,75 212,3
,87 5,3
13,71 2b,3
FOR CYCLES 1 AND 2)
FOR CYCLES 3 AND ^ )
HC- HD 0, 35(
CO- NDIR 0,35(
C02-MOIR 0,35(
N02-CL 0.35C
FUEL 0,35(
FUEL CONSUMED =
D GRAM
C02
73.0
383.7
b02.8
383.7
294.2
3H3.7
8b8,2
398, 1
3b,2
73.2
390,9
fa20,0
390,9
294,2
390,9
878,7
39B.1
3b,2
73,2
398.1
bll.4
383,7
294,2
390,9
Bb8,2
405,4
3b,2
73.2
390,9
b20,0
390,9
294.2
390,9
8bB,2
405,4
3b,2
3.
34,
3t7,
3.
130,
98,
MTME-MODI FTP
5,2 LITWE VB r, V « 74B4 KG HUM = 18
N02 FUEL
,02 30,75
3,12 122,42
10,21 192,97
3.12 122,15
,0? 92, 92
3,12 123,83
4,44 381,47
3,31 128.51
,02 3b,55
,02 43,80
2,93 12b,97
10,40 200,21
3,31 125,58
,02 92,97
3,49 124,99
t,tt 387,02
3,bB 129.11
,02 37,82
,02 42,41
3,31 128. Ifa
10, 9b 197,98
3.31 124,44
,02 93.29
3,49 12b,13
4,25 383,80
3,b8 131.38
,0? 38,09
,02 44,48
3,12 12b,42
ll.lt 199, b7
3,31 12t ,99
,02 93,20
3,12 125,53
t ,0b 384 ,97
3,87 131,41
,02 38.19
3) + O.b5( 3
7) + 0,bS( 38
b ) + 0 , b5 ( 349
05 + 0,b5( 3
2) » 0,b5( 132
FACT|
.232
,077
.147
.077
.057
,077
,113
,077
,its
,232
,07?
,147
,077
.057
,077
,113
,077
.its
,232
,077
,lt?
.077
,057
,077
,113
,077
.its
,232
,077
,lt7
,077
,057
,077
.113
,077
.its
,4) = 3
.7) s 37
,1) = 348
,2) * 3
,7) = 131
,3 G/KG
---WEIGHTED GRAMS/MINUTE ---
HC CO C02 NQ2 FUEL
,21 3,2
,08 ,1
.Oh ,1
.01 ,0
,05 ,3
,bS 23,2
,0b ,3
2,00 3,2
Jan n ri n
, 3 U J U | B
,27 9,1
,08 ,4
,21 ,9
,0b ,2
,01 .0
,0b ,1
,b5 23,7
,07 ,4
2,00 3,b
33 Q 3 Q L
t J " J O | O
,25 8,5
,08 ,2
,20 1,1
,0b ,4
,01 ,0
.Ob ,3
,b5 23,7
,0b ,4
2,04 3,b
3ti n ^ o ^
f T U J 0 a 3
,27 9,5
,08 ,3
,
-------
TRUCK o? TEST
APPENDIX C-21
TABLE 02. ^ASS EMISSION BY *ODIFItD MNE-*ODE FTP
4 3- 7-75 CHEVROLET D?GAS 1974 b.O LITRE V8 GVw 10*33 KG HUM * 8,7 G/KG
CONCENTRATION CORRECTED ----CALCULATED GRAMS/MJNU
*ODE HC CO C02 NOX HC CO C02 M02
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
1 in HC,
4 Ib HG
5 19 rt&
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 ib HG
q C.T, i
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
a 10 HG
4 ib HG
5 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
9 C.T. 1
1 IDLE
2 ib HG
3 in HG
4 Ib HG
5 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
•» C.T. !
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
4 Ib HG
S 19 H G
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
B Ib HG
* C.T. |
^24
Ibl
288
144
S3
134
553
1 49
072
202
171
288
141
S3
1 44
528
149
372
229
Ibl
291
14b
58
13b
553
ISb
472
249
Ib4
213
14b
S3
141
554
154
222
AVERAGE SJM---
FOUR CVCLF
2b99
2517
21S4
22^b
1 339
20b5
4050
2193
23bb
27bb
2582
2091
225b
1278
2125
433b
2382
2770
2b91
2512
2152
212b
1397
20b2
»281
2383
2043
25b5
2382
2150
2254
1337
2125
4173
2317
2301
, 3b 0
1,32 18
2,23 218
1.35 23
,9b n
1,32 23
3.17 504
1,32 28
.35 0
,38 0
1,32 18
2.23 238
1.31; 23
,98 0
1,41 28
3,25 499
1.4] 23
, 30 0
PflMPfiQTTP
^U^^Uol 1 C.
,3b 0
1.41 18
2.28 233
1,39 23
1,00 0
1.41 23
3,04 501
1,31 23
.28 0
rn^DflQl Tc
LUiVirUal 1 fc
.35 0
1.41 18
2,M 233
1,39 23
1,00 0
1,41 23
3,43 514
1,41 23
, 33 0
rnuoneTTET
* L T L L t L. L' '"" u o A i t,
(COMPOSITE VALUtS
tf*r*L4r\r\£*VVC t , A l lice
COMPOSITE -
2,35 57,0 120. P
l.bl 53.2 441,9
3,02 45.5 743,1
1,50 47,7 449,3
,55 28,3 371,1
1,40 43, b 441,9
5,79 85, b 1059,5
1 ,5b 4b, 3 441,9
11.22 50,0 115,4
2,11 58,4 12b,4
1,79 S4,b 441,9
3,02 44,2 743,1
1,48 47,7 449,3
,55 27,0 328, b
1,51 44.9 471,9
5.53 91, b 1083,3
l.Sb 50,3 472,0
14. 3b 58,5 91,0
2.40 57,0 120,8
l.bl 53,1 472,0
3,04 45,5 7b2,0
1,53 44.9 4b4, 3
,bO 29,5 335,3
1,43 43, b 471,9
5,79 10,5 1013,1
1 ,b4 50,4 4b4,4
15,40 43,2 93,5
2,bi 54,2 115,3
1,72 50,3 472,0
3,07 45,4 771, b
1.53 47, b 4b4,4
,55 28,3 335,3
1,48 44,9 471,1
5,80 88,2 1144,3
l.bl 49,0 472.0
12,71 48, b 101,1
HC- FID 0.3SC 3
CO- NDIR 0,35( 54
C02-NOIR 0,35( 431
N02-CL 0,35( 3
FUEL o,35( ib?
FUEL CONSUMED = i2b
,on
,59
7,10
,7b
.01
,7b
Ib, 38
,"2
.00
,00
.59
7.75
,7b
,01
,9J
lh.21
.7b
,00
,00
.59
7.51
,7b
,01
,7b
lb,S4
,7b
.00
,00
,59
7,59
,7b
.01
,7b
lb,70
,7b
,00
,9) + 0
,3) + 0
,8) * 0
,2) + 0
,1) + 0
,01b
FUEL
b8,74
Ib7.49
2bO,04
lbb.11
lib, 13
Ib2,45
382,52
Ib3,15
72,40
70,17
Ib8,21
259,38
lbb,8B
117, b2
172, bB
392, 7b
175,43
74, b2
bB,79
17b,94
Ebb, 03
170,32
121,05
171,13
370,31
173,13
bb,31
bS,85
175,51
2b1,07
171, bb
120,37
172, b5
410,58
174,80
71,55
,bS( 4,
,b5( 52,
,b5( 440,
,bS( 3,
,b5( Ibl,
WT,
FACT.
.232
,077
,147
,077
.057
.077
.113
.077
.143
,232
,077
,147
,077
,057
,077
,113
,077
,143
.232
,077
,147
,077
,057
,077
,113
.077
,143
,232
,077
, 147
,077
,057
,077
,113
,077
,1*3
23 B 4
7) = S3
1) = 437
2) s 3
2) a IBS
-•-WEIGHTED GRAMS/MINUTE---
HC co co2 NO? FUEL
.54
,13
,44
.12
,03
.U
,bS
.12
l.bO
1 * C
3 , f 5
,41
. 14
,44
,11
.03
.12
,b3
.12
2,05
4 11
4,13
,5b
.13
.45
.12
.03
.11
,bS
.13
2.20
u "a o
T g 3 O
,bO
.13
,45
.12
.03
,11
,bb
.12
1,83
a n U
™ f U Q
3,94
HD S
I C C
,122
,23b
,237
,111
.471
13,2 28
4,1 34
b,7 109
3,7 35
l.b IB
3,4 34
9,7 1?0
3. fa 34
7,1 Ib
C 1 1 U 3 Q
3 J 1 i. t 6 D
11, b 29
4,2 14
b,5 101
3,7 35
1,5 19
3,5 3b
10,4 i?2
3,1 3b
8,4 14
C c C u i c
J 3 f 3 T J 9
13,2 28
4,1 3b
b,7 112
3,5 3b
1,7 11
3,4 3b
10,2 114
3,1 3b
b,2 13
C 3 Q U Q t
3 C y O f J A
12, b 27
3,1 3b
b,7 113
3,7 3b
l,b 11
3,5 3fa
10,0 121
3,8 3b
7,0 Ib
c 3 L u 11 Q
3 C f B "* t 1
54,3 432
c y ^ u u n
b t , f 440
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
GBAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
,00
,05
1,04
,0b
,00
,0b
1,85
.07
,00
31 t
t •
.00
,05
1.14
,0b
,00
,07
1,83
,0b
,00
1 21
',00
,05
1,12
.Ob
,00
,0k
1,8?
,0b
,00
3 a \
• ' •
,00
,05
1.12
,0b
,00
.Ob
1,89
,0b
,00
3 23
3^17
33 3
,22
15,9
12.1
38.2
12,9
b ,b
12.5
43.2
12, b
10,4
1 L C 1
1 b 3 , 3
Ib.S
13,0
38,1
12,9
b.7
13,3
44,4
13,5
10,7
i u Q n
i b 1 « U
lb,0
13, b
31.1
13,1
b,1
13. 1
41.8
13,1
t L L 1
1 b b g b
15,3
13,5
31, b
13,2
b,1
13.3
4b,4
13,5
10,2
1 « Q 3
Ibl , e
MILLILITRES/MINUTE
n
00
o-
-------
TRUCK 03 TEST
TABU °3-
3- b-75
APPENDIX C-Z1
MASS EMISSION BY MODIFIED NINE-MODE FTP
FORD D2GAS 1973 5,9 LITRE V8
GVW 10433 KU
HUM
11,0 G/KG
MODE
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
9 10 HG
4 ib HG
5 is HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
^ C.T,
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
4 Ib HG
5 is HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
<< C,T,
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
4 Ifa HG
5 19 HG
fa Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
9 C,T,
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
4 Ib HG
5 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
* C.T.
AVERAGE
CONCENTRATION CORRECTED - — -CALCULATED GRAM
HC CO CO? NOX HC CO CO?
9b
143
272
125
4?
128
188
118
1151
111
145
282
128
59
123
181
115
117b
113
145
272
123
sq
133
19b
125
117b
133
155
287
133
72
130
IBb
125
112b
SUM---
ft . .if
1414
109?
11 34
1H9?
3b3
109?
bl?
1091
b49
m r v r i £
* L ' L L t
1414
1034
1308
97b
417
97b
fal?
1033
70b
1475
1092
1135
97b
473
1092
5b3
1034
b4S
-CYCLt
1537
1092
1425
1034
584
1034
5b3
1092
7b3
.23 1
1,28 b3
2,03 333
1 ,2b bB
,9? 13
l,2b bB
2,93 528
1,30 7B
,23 1
.23 1
1,28 b8
2,01 3?8
1,28 78
, Sb 18
1,28 73
2,93 548
1,30 83
.23 1
.23 1
1,28 b8
1,98 328
1.28 73
,92 13
1,28 73
2,93 558
1,28 78
,23 1
COMPOSITE
.23 1
1.28 bB
?,03 328
l,2b 73
,92 13
1.28 bS
g,90 578
l,2b 78
,23 1
(COMPOSITE VALUES
f f n nQfietTB? 1 / A 1 IIITO
AVERAGE our'-~-vi-U'T|ruai ic. v « u u t o
FOUR CYCLE COMPOSITE -
1.01 30.0
1.50 23.2
2,8b 24,1
1,32 23,2
.49 7.7
1 ' 1 f
1,34 23,?
1,98 13,1
1.24 23.2
12.10 13,8
1,17 30,0
1,53 22,0
2,9b 27,8
1,34 20,7
,b3 8,9
1,29 ?0, 7
1.90 13.1
1,21 21,9
12,37 15,0
1.19 31,3
1,53 23,2
2,Bb 24,1
1,29 20,7
,b3 10,0
1,40 23,2
2. Ob 12,0
1.32 22.0
12,37 13,8
1,40 32, b
l.b.3 23,2
3,02 30,3
1,40 22,0
,7b 12,4
1,37 22,0
1,95 12,0
1,32 23,2
11,84 lb,2
FOR CYCLES 1 AND 2)
FOR CYCLES 3 AND t)
HC- FID 0,35(
CO- NDIR 0,35(
C02-NDIR 0.3SC
N02-CL 0.35C
FUEL 0.35C
FUEL CONSUMED =
77.5
429,0
b81 , 7
421, b
30q , q
421 ,b
983,3
43b,4
77.5
77,5
429,0
b72,8
429,0
323,3
429,0
983,3
43b,4
77,6
77,5
429,0
bb3,8
429.0
309,9
429,0
983,3
4S9.0
77,5
77.5
4?9,0
bBl.B
421, b
309,9
429,0
972,2
431, b
77.5
3.
21,
389.
4 ,
13b,
102,
N02 FUEL
,02 40,34
?,21 148,35
11,71 229,89
2, 3fl 145,85
,45 102,08
2,38 145,87
18,58 318.74
2,74 150,41
,02 43, 3q
,02 40,50
2,38 147, 7b
11,54 229,01
2,74 14b,qb
,fa2 107,01
2.5fa 14b,Sl
19,28 318, fab
2,91 149,77
,02 44, 2b
,02 41,17
2,38 148,37
11,53 224,25
2,5b 14b,91
,45 103,38
2,5b 148,24
19, b3 318,25
2,74 147, S5
,02 43, b5
,02 42,03
2,38 148,48
11,54 233,13
2,5b 145,31
,45 104, b9
8.J8 147,bO
20,33 314,b2
2,74 145,85
,02 44,34
1) * 0,b5( 3
b) + 0,b5( 22
9) * D,b5( 387
7) + 0,bS( 4
8) + 0,b5( 13b
WT,
FACT,
,23?
,077
,147
,077
,057
,077
,113
.077
.113
,232
,077
,147
,077
,057
,077
.113
,077
,143
,232
,077
,1*1
,077
,057
,077
,113
,077
,143
,232
,077
,147
,077
,057
,077
,113
,077
,143
,2) * 3.
.5) = ?2.
,7) s 3B8,
.8) = 4.
,b) s life.
---WEIGHTED GRAMS/MINUTE---
HC CO C02 N02 FUEL
.23
,12
,42
.10
.03
,10
.22
.10
1.73
3fi C
t U b
.27
.12
,44
,10
,04
.10
.21
.09
1,77
31 U-
( A ~
,28
.12
,42
,10
,04
,11
,23
,10
1,77
3,lb
,33
,13
,44
,11
,04
,11
.22
,10
I,b9
31 *
,1'
3,10
3 1 1 fa
139
170
4S3
733
b95
7,0
1.8
3.5
1.8
.4
1,8
1,5
1.8
2.0
3 t c
cl , b
7,0
1,7
4.1
l.b
,5
l.b
1,5
1,7
2,1
3 \ Q
C 4. | O
7,3
1,B
3,5
l.b
.b
1.8
I.1*
1.7
2,0
21, b
7,b
1.8
4.4
1.7
.7
1.7
1,*
1,8
33 •j
e3 , 3
33 C
18
33
100
32
18
32
111
34
11
i o n
3 *H U
18
33
99
33
18
33
ill
34
11
•a o n
3 ~ U
18
33
98
33
18
33
111
33
11
388
18
33
100
32
18
33
110
32
11
HOD
3 o o
3RD
;» n ft
c c , b j o o
GRAMS/MINUTE
,00 9,4
,17 11.4
1,72 33,8
.18 11,2
,03 5,8
,18 11,2
2,10 3b,0
,21 11. b
,00 b,2
u L. n i^k ^
t I b u l a o ( r
,00 9,4
.18 11,4
1,70 33,7
.21 11,3
,04 b,l
,20 11,3
2,18 3b,0
,22 11,5
.00 b,3
u, •** 137 n
T,rj 43', U
,00 9,b
,18 11,4
1,70 33,0
,20 11,3
,03 5,9
.20 11,4
2,22 3b,0
,81 11,4
,00 b,?
4,74 13b,l
,00 9.8
.18 11,4
1,70 34,3
,80 11,2
,03 b,Q
,18 11,4
2,30 35, b
,21 11,2
,00 b,3
40 n i ^ i i
,t)U 137,1
4,b? 13b,8
4,77 13b, b
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
248 MILLILITRES/MINUTE
O
oo
-j
-------
n
i
03
00
TRUCK
MODE
1 IDLE
? ib HG
3 10 HG
* ib HG
s 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
1 C.T,
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
* Ifa HG
S 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HO
* C.T,
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
* Ib HG
5 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
B Ib HG
1 C.T,
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
* Ib HG
S 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
* C.T,
AVERAGE
T
n* TFST i
AflLt °4.
3- b-75
APPENDIX C-21
MASS EMISSION BY MODIFIED
IHC D?GAS 197b
NINE-MODE FTP
5,7 LITRE V8 GVrt 10?0b KG HUM
CONCENTRATION CORRECTED ----CALCULATED GRAMS/MINu
HC CO CO? NOX HC CO C02 NO?
?3b 115
179 910
3*b ?0?*
Ib* 85*
ai *b5
Ib? 910
59b 9?3b
17* 9b7
31? ?*9
251 ?SO
18? 9b8
3*9 ?023
Ib? B5*
93 521
157 910
*7J 8107
17? 910
312 ?*9
?3b 250
18* 9b8
357 ?1*8
172 910
Bb 521
Ib? 910
671 830*
17* 1025
337 2*9
H f" V f" 1 C
?5b 195
187 910
359 ?08b
17* 910
Sb 57b
Ib7 9bB
5*5 71bO
17* 9b8
3b? 2*9
f* W P 1 C
,2* 1
l.?2 38
1.83 178
1,2? *3
,9i* 33
1.22 *3
2.5* 17B
1,2* *8
.57 1
I** fl (Jl D n O T TC
L U"r US lit
.2* 1
1.20 38
1.8b 178
1.2? *3
.9? 33
1,22 *3
?,bO IbB
1,22 *B
.55 1
m UD n Q T T IT
u u " " u o i it
.2* 1
1,2? 38
l,8b 178
1,2? *3
,95 33
1,2? *3
2.bO IbB
1.22 *8
.55 1
f n (j D n c T TC
COMr OS! T t
.2* 1
1.2? 38
1.83 183
1.2? *8
.95 33
1.20 *8
2,bO 203
1.2? SI
,55 1
r* nun n e T T r
SuM (COMPOSITE VALUES
M..IJ /^munr-i^TVH1 u A i litre
AVERAGE aiji«---ii,uTuoiic VMLUCO
FOUR CYCLE COMPOSITE •
2.52 *,2
1,9? 19, b
3,70 *3,7
1,75 18.*
,8b 10,0
l.b? 19, b
b,37 199,3
1 ,8b ?0,9
3.3* 5,*
?,bB S.*
1,9* ?0,9
3,73 *3,7
1,78 18,*
,89 U.?
I,b7 19, b
5,03 17*, 9
1,8* 19, b
3.3* S,*
2,5? S.*
1.97 20,9
3,81 *b,3
1.8* 19, b
.12 11,2
1,73 19, b
b.10 179,?
1.8b 22,1
3,bO 5,*
2,7* *,2
2,00 19, b
3,8* *S,0
l.Bb 19, b
.92 1?.*
1.78 ?0.9
5,83 15*. 5
l,8b 20,9
3,87 5,*
FOR CYCLES 1 AND 2)
C n D fV^lt'Q 3 A \i ft U ^
POn LYLUC-3 3 AND TJ
HC- FID 0,35(
CO- NDIR 0.1SC
C02-NDIR 0,35(
N02»CL 0,35(
FUEL 0.35C
FUEL CONSUMED =
8?, 7
*1*,8
b?*,*
*!*,?
322,1
*1*,7
8b*,8
*?2,2
19?, 8
82,7
*07,*
b33.2
*1*,7
315,?
*1*,7
885, b
*1*,8
I8b,7
82,7
*1*,8
b33,2
*1*,8
322,1
*1H,7
885, b
*1*,8
18b,7
82.7
*1*,B
b2*,*
*1*,8
32?, 1
*07,*
885,*
*1*,8
18b,7
2
3b
383
?
1*1
105
,02
1,37
b,*5
1.55
1.1"
1,55
b,*b
1,7*
.03
,02
1,37
b,*5
1,55
l.H
1,55
b.m
1,7*
.03
.02
1,37
b.*5
1.55
1,11
1.55
b,10
1.7*
.03
,02
1.37
fa,b3
1.7*
1,11
1,73
7.37
1,12
,03
,9) * 0
,1) * 0
,5) * 0
,2) + 0
.8) + 0
.Bib
FUEL
30,70
1*2,5?
???.3b
1*1,7*
107, *b
1*2,22
378,0*
1*5,*?
bb,8?
31,**
1*0,83
225,15
1*1,77
105,93
i*?,28
371,17
1*?,**
b*,90
31, ?8
1*3,19
2?b,S8
1*2,**
108,11
1*2,33
37*, 37
1*3,70
b5,17
30,91
1*2, bO
223,17
1*2, *b
108,70
1*0, b7
3bl,78
1*3,08
bS,**
,bS( 3
,b5( 3*
,b5( 38*
,b5( 2
,bS{ 1*1
«T,
FACT,
,232
,077
,1*7
,077
,057
,077
.113
,077
.1*3
,?3?
,077
,1*7
,077
,057
,077
.113
,077
,1*3
,232
,077
.1*?
,077
,057
,077
.113
,077
.1*3
,23?
.077
.1*7
,077
,057
,077
,113
,077
,1*3
,0) » 2
,*) = 35
,2) * 383
.3) B 2
.3) B 1*1
• 11,* G/KG
-•-WEIGHTED GRAMS/MINUTE---
HC CO COZ NO? FUEL
.59
.15
.5*
.1*
.05
.1?
.72
.1*
,*8
3 a l
f. , 1 3
.b?
.15
.55
,1*
,05
.13
,»7
,1*
,*8
9 Dt
e , B c
,59
,15
,5b
,1*
,05
,13
,h1
,1*
,58
20 *
9 ^ '
,b*
,15
,5b
,1*
,05
.1*
,bb
,1*
,55
31") 11
i u t
2,88
3n i
,01
,9bO
.OOb
,9b7
.270
,*b5
1,0 19
1,5 3?
b,* 9?
1,* 32
,b IB
1,5 3?
??,S 98
l.b 33
,8 28
17 A 1 H "3
j f | -3 j a j
1,3 19
l.b 31
b,* 93
1,* 32
,b IB
1,5 1?
19,8 100
1,5 32
,8 27
•a u • 1 B li
* ~ | ~ Ji B T
1,3 19
l.b 32
b,8 93
1,5 32
,b 18
1,5 12
20,2 100
1,7 92
,8 87
i u i 4 Q £
J 9 | 1 J 0 3
1.0 19
1,5 32
b.b 92
1,5 32
,7 18
l.b 11
17,5 100
l.b 3?
,8 27
IP D ^ 0 "5
J C f B J B J
3b.l 38*
^ u u 4 O U
3* , * Sot
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
,01
.11
,15
.1?
,07
.1?
.73
,13
,00
23 a
. "
.01
,11
,95
,12
,07
,12
,b9
,13
,00
21 Q
, i^
,01
,11
,15
,12
,07
,18
,b1
,13
,00
21 Q
• A *1
,01
ill
,98
,13
,07
,13
,83
,15
,00
211 1
• * 1
2,21
21 n
t J u
7,1
11,0
32,7
10,9
b.l
11,0
*B, 7
11,2
9,b
1 U 9 p
1 T C , C
7,3
10,8
33,1
10,9
b.O
11,0
*1,1
11.0
1,3
ml
t
7,1
11,0
33,3
11.0
b,2
11,0
*e,3
11.1
1,3
\ a B U
1 T B f *
7,2
11,0
32,8
11,0
b,2
10.8
*0,9
11,0
9,*
tun a
1 IT U v C
1*1,8
m^
| J
MILLILITRES/MINUTE
-------
TRUCK OS TEST
APPENDIX C-21
TABLE 05. MASS EMISSION BY MODIFIED NINE-MODE FTP
3-31-75 CHEVROLfcT D2GAS 11b5 4.8 LITRt Ib
KG
HUM
I."* G/KG
MODE
i IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
4 ib HG
5 is HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
1 C.T,
I IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
4 Ib HG
5 11 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
1 C.T,
1 IDLE
i Ib HG
3 10 HG
4 Ib HG
S m HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
9 Ib HG
1 C,T,
1 IDLE
3 Ib HG
3 10 HG
4 Ib HG
5 11 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
* C.T.
AVERAGE
A \ / C Q A r" C
CONCENTRATION CORRECTED ----CALCULATED GRAMS/MIMU
HC co cos NOX HC co cot NO?
213 S?
2b3 i*07
IrfS b77
278 352
373 520
2b4 428
312 12177
231 «*07
411 242
2bb 187
231 511
12P 728
231 37>»
338 542
243 i*21
315 12218
21* 407
421 242
241 187
2b4 428
120 b72
181 428
388 570
22i* 483
105 125b4
231 45b
401 215
27b 215
2b3 484
123 84?
214 45b
388 570
313 401
317 1231B
214 401
401 242
rvr1! C
.20 0
1,02 bl
I,b7 115
1,05 bO
,73 17
1,07 55
2,04 bO
1,07 71
,18 0
pnMQncTYc
LUMKUSI 1 t
,20 0
1,07 b7
1,70 200
1,07 74
,73 17
1,05 70
3, Ob 55
1,01 72
.17 0
r nMDn Q T T (
^.u^ruai i c.
.20 0
1,07 b8
1,70 210
1.07 feS
,73 Ib
1.07 71
2.04 55
1,01 77
,18 0
fnMDflQTTC1
LU~rU31 1C,
,18 0
1,02 70
l.bS 205
1,07 bS
,73 10
1,02 55
1,18 53
1,01 7b
,20 0
^*rt*JQnft T TC"
SuM--»(CO*PQSlTE VALUES
A, ,11 /^munnoY^ff u A i i i p1 e>
AVERAGE o '.j f1 — ~ - t u u ^ r u o i i c VHL-VJC.O
FOUR CYCLE COMPOSITE -
2.28 1,8
2,81 8,8
1,34 14, b
2,17 7,b
3,18 11.2
2,81 1,2
4 ,19 2b2, 3
2,55 8,8
4.3B 5,2
2,84 4,0
2,55 11,0
1,21 15,7
2,55 8,1
3,bO 11,7
2,bO 1,2
4,22 2bH,l
2,28 8,8
4,49 5,2
2,57 4,0
2.81 1,2
1,21 14,5
2,01 9,2
4,14 12,3
2,31 10,4
4,32 270, b
2,55 1,8
4,28 4,b
2,14 4,b
2,81 10,4
1,31 18,1
2,28 1,8
4,14 12,3
3,34 B,b
4,24 2fa5,3
2,28 8,b
4,28 5,2
FOR CYCLES 1 AND 2)
c n D rvricft i AMn u^
rUn UTlrUC.3 J ** IN L* "/
HC- FID 0,JS(
CO- NDIR 0.35C
C02-NDIR 0,35{
N02-CL 0,35(
FUEL o,35<
FUEL CONSUMED =
b7,b
348. b
Sfal.J
355, b
248,1
3b2,b
b93,2
3b2,b
b2,3
b7,b
3b2,b
577, b
3b2,b
248,1
355. b
702,4
3b1,b
57,0
b?,b
3b2,b
577, b
3b2,b
248,1
3b2.b
b13,3
3b1,b
b2,3
b2,3
348, b
5bl,0
3b2.b
248,9
318, b
b7S,l
3b1,b
b?,7
2.
3b,
312,
1.
119,
81,
,00
2,3b
b.b2
2,03
,57
l,8b
2,03
2,41
,00
,00
2.29
b,79
2,51
,57
2.37
l.Bb
2,44
,00
,00
2.31
7.13
2,20
,54
2,42
1.8b
2,bl
,00
,00
2.37
b,9b
2,20
,3*
1.8b
1,80
2,58
,00
1) * 0
8) + 0
4) + 0
1) + 0
8) + 0
b!4
FUEL
24.41
117.15
1S8.18
118.93
88, Ob
121,71
35?, 15
121,21
2b,b3
2b,18
122.41
111,31
120,14
87,12
111,37
357,17
123.25
25, Ob
26,11
121,71
110,70
120,11
88, 7b
121,15
357,24
124.04
2b,23
24,81
117,17
187,30
121,55
88,7b
117, b2
348,78
123,11
28,21
,b5( 2
,b5( 38
,b5( 310
,b5( 2
,b5( 111
WT.
FACT,
,232
,077
,1*7
,077
,0b7
,077
.113
,077
,1H3
,232
,077
,147
,077
,057
,077
,113
,077
.1*3
,232
,077
.1*'
,077
,057
,077
,113
,077
,1*3
.232
,077
,lt7
,077
,057
,077
.113
,07?
.1*3
,9) » 2
,0) s 37
,7) « 311
,0) = 1
,8) = 111
---WEIGHTED GRAMS/MINUTE---
HC CO C02 NO? FUEL
,63 ,4
,22 ,7
,20 2,1
,23 ,b
.23 ,b
.22 ,7
,47 21, b
,20 ,7
,b3 ,7
2Q 1 3 U P
( 1 i 3 0 | C
,bb ,1
,80 .8
,19 2,3
.20 ,b
,21 ,?
,20 ,7
,48 21,9
,18 ,7
,b4 ,7
eg ti a -i u
I ~ T y r y ~
,bO ,1
,22 ,7
,19 2,1
,15 ,7
.24 ,7
,18 ,8
,41 30, b
,20 ,8
,bl ,7
eQ 3 $ Q O
% o r 9 o | u
,bB 1,1
,22 ,8
,19 8,7
,18 ,8
.?<* ,7
,ib ,7
,48 30,0
,18 .7
,bl ,7
j n ^ ^ H i
J j U J J O | 1
2,92 3b,8
Sar -^ Q r\
ib
27
84
27
14
28
78
ee
9
•a i \
3 1 i
Ib
28
as
28
14
27
71
ea
8
« 1 u
j i ~
Ib
28
85
28
14
28
78
28
1
•a i u
j i **
14
17
82
28
14
87
7b
ee
10
•3 n l
J U r
312
•a i i
1*13 J O ( U J 1 1
,941 GRAMS/MINUTE
,00
,18
.''7
,lb
,03
,lt
,23
.1^
,00
i a n
L , ~ U
,00
,18
1,00
,n
,03
,18
,21
,1^
,00
i Q a
i , TS
,00
,18
1,05
.17
,03
.n
,81
,20
,00
8n ^
•
,00
,18
1,02
.17
,02
,1*
,20
.80
,00
10 U
t Mt
1,94
I Q Q
1 , 18
5,7
9,0
27,7
1,2
5,0
9,4
31,9
S3
3,8
110 Q
110,1
fe.i
1.4
28,1
9,3
5,0
*,?
40,4
*,5
3,b
i ? a b
A B W | O
b.O
1,4
28,0
^,3
5,1
9,4
40,4
9,b
3.8
1 3 n Q
1 C U | 1
5,8
-------
TRUCK Ob TEST
APPENDIX C-21
TABLfc °6- MASS EMISSION BY MODIFIED MlNt-^OOt FTP
1 i. 1-75 FORD D2GAS 1971 b,l LITRt V8
GVW 10505 KG
HUM x
1,0
n
•~o
o
MODE
HC
^NITRATION CORRECTED
CO C02 NO*
----CALCULATED GRAMS/MINUTE----- «T.
HC CO C02 N02 FUEL FACT,
---WEIGHTED GRAMS/MINUTt---
HC CO COS N02 FUEL
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
* Ib HG
5 19 HG
t Ib HG
7 3 HG
B Ib HG
9 C.T,
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
J 10 HG
* Ib HG
5 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
B Ib HG
9 C,T,
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
* Ib HG
S 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
* C.T,
1 lOtt
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
* Ib HG
S 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
1 C,T.
A W C D A P C
A V t K Al»t
AVERAGE
7b2
218
279
1*3
53
138
578
IbS
] 338
b38
2*3
31*
IbB
b3
IbS
bO*
193
1338
588
218
31b
173
7b
170
578
180
1338
bb3
230
321
190
73
175
577
193
1313
?lb
7b5
1130
79*
377
851
58*7
99b
*09
• r VP i t
• V- T l» U C
325
qqb
1277
9b7
*59
99b
b090
108*
r VPI f
•L Y LL.C
353
1025
13**
99fa
*87
9b7
&120
1115
381
r v p i c
•LTCLt
298
1085
1339
102b
*&9
9b?
*272
1115
*37
^ n un n t
,33 0
1.39 qs
2.17 285
1,39 ion
1,05 30
l.*l 100
3,07 390
l.*l 95
, 3D 0
pnuDncTTc
, 38 0
l.*b 105
2.23 315
1,** US
1.09 35
l,*b US
3.11 *15
l.lb 115
.31 0
,38 0
1.** 110
1,95 325
1,*1 120
1,09 25
1,** 125
3,0* **0
1,*1 120
,30 0
p n UDH Q T Tf
CU"r Uo 1 it
,3b 1
1.39 110
a.i* 3is
1,11 130
1.07 35
1 ,*1 1ZS
3,0* 505
1,*1 130
,30 0
p nwiD n Q T T F
UU^rl^Ol 1 C.
STVtT U A 1 1 1C Q
SljM — — — (uumruoj it v w u w c. *j
SUM-— (COMPOSITE VALUES
FOUR CYCLE COMPOSITE -
7.9* 1,5 108,9
2.27 lb.1 »bl,8
2,91 23,8 720, b
1 ,*8 Ib. 7 1hl,8
,55 7,9 3*7.1
1,*3 17,9 1b9,1
b,02 123,0 1019,7
1,72 21,0 1b9,1
13.93 B.b 98,2
b.bl b,8 125,5
2, S3 20,9 181,7
3,27 2b,8 739,2
1,75 20,3 177,0
,bb 9,7 3bO,8
1,72 20,9 181,7
b,29 128,1 1031,2
2,01 22,8 181,7
13,93 8,b 103, b
b,12 7,1 125,5
2,27 21, b 177,0
3,29 28,3 b18,b
1,80 21,0 1b9,1
,79 10,2 JbO.8
1,77 20,3 177,0
b,02 111,0 1008,2
1,88 23,* 1b9,*
13,93 8,0 98,2
b,90 b,3 119,9
2,*0 22,8 *fal,9
3,35 28,2 711,*
1,98 21, b *fa9t*
,7b 9,7 353,9
1,82 20,3 1b9,1
b.Ol 89,8 1008,1
2,01 23,1 1b9,1
13, b7 9,2 98,2
HC- FID 0,35( S
CO- NOIR 0,35( 27
C02»NDIR 0,35( 131
N03-CL 0.35C 1
FUEL 0.3SC 151
FUEL CONSUMED f ill
.02
3.11
9,33
3,27
1,00
3,27
12.77
3.11
,01
,02
i , *i
10,31
3,7b
1,15
3,7b
13,58
3,7b
.01
.02
3,bO
10, b*
3.93
,82
*,09
1*,*0
3.93
,02
,03
3,faO
10,97
*,2b
1,15
*,09
lb,53
*,8b
,01
,*) * 0
,0) + 0
,0) + 0
,1) * 0
.8) + 0
,001
**.5b
155, 9b
2*2,03
155,18
113, qq
158, *1
388,71
lbO,22
19,17
19, b2
lbS,83
2*9,82
Ib2.33
119,29
Ib5,02
395,11
lbb,21
50,88
*9,38
lfaJ.*7
221,95
lbO,30
119,71
Ib2,3b
380, b*
Ibl.bl
*8,8B
*7,8*
159,15
8*1, 7b
IbO, 79
117,23
lbO,02
3b8,bO
Ibl , 7*
*9,20
,b5( 5
,fa&( 25
,f»5{ 121
,bS( 1
,b5( 151
,232
,077
,1*7
,077
,057
,077
.113
.077
.1*3
.232
,077
.1*7
,077
,057
,077
,113
,077
.1*3
,232
,077
,1*7
,077
,057
,077
,113
,077
.1*3
,232
,077
, 1**7
,077
,057
,077
,113
,077
.1*3
,3) 5
,8) eb
,b) *2*
,b) *
,1) 152
1.8*
.17
,*3
,11
.03
,11
,bB
,13
1.99
5C ]
t " A
1.5*
.19
,*8
,13
,0*
,13
,71
.15
1,99
S» a
1 9 a
l.*2
.17
.18
.1*
.OS
.1*
,b8
.1*
1.99
c 3 1
a , el
l.bO
,18
,*9
.15
.0*
.1*
,b8
.15
1.95
5u n
f T U
c U U
&!u
,35b
,18b
1.1
1.2
3.5
1.3
,5
1.*
13,9
l.b
1.2
3 C L
C 3 ( 0
lib
3.9
l.b
,b
l.b
i*,s
1,8
1,2
l|7
1,7
* ,2
l.b
.b
1, b
12,9
1,8
1,1
a «j i
e? 1 1
1,5
1.8
* ,1
1,7
,b
1 >b
10,1
1.8
1.3
a ^ n
c r ( U
25,8
25 ,00
3b ,2*
lOb 1.37
3b ,25
20 ,0b
3b ,25
115 1,**
3b ,i*
1* ,00
u a u a at
T C T 3 y V •
29 ,00
37 ,2b
109 1,52
37 ,29
21 ,07
37 ,29
117 1,5*
97 ,89
IS ,00
ii o o 11 a c
t J o T t a >
29 ,00
17 ,28
95 l,Sb
Ib ,30
21 ,06
37 ,J2
11* I,b3
3b ,30
1* ,00
U 1 Q U 14 U
™ A ~ T | T T
28 ,01
3b ,28
10S l.bl
3b ,33
ao ,07
3b ,32
11* 1,87
3b ,33
i* .00
u a c u an
T C B t j O U
mu n L
~ I U O
*22 *,b?
10,3
12,0
3b,b
12,0
b , b
ia,a
13,9
12,3
7,0
mq
t ~
11,5
12 , B
3b,7
12,5
b.e
12,7
**,7
12,8
7,9
ills
12, b
38, b
12,9
b,8
12, S
*3,0
18.*
7,0
\ c n o
i 3 U | O
11,1
12,3
15,5
12,*
b.7
12,3
*1, 7
12,5
7,0
mu
• **
1 C.U A
1 at I B
1S1.1
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAM$/MINUTE
,9is GRAMS/MINUTE
,*e3 GRAMS/MINUTE
,*08
GRAMS/MINUTE
MILLILITRES/MINUTE
-------
TRUCK 0' TEST 2
APPENDIX C-21
TARLt 07. MASS EMISSION PY MODIFIED NINE.MODE FTP
t-in-75 IHC 02GAS i97t b.t LITRE VB
GVW 10732 KG HUM a 10,8 G/K6
MODE
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
1 Ib HG
5 19 H G
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
1 C,T,
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
* Ib HG
5 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
* C,T,
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
t Ib HG
5 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
9 C.T,
1 IDLE
S Ib HG
3 10 HG
t Ib HG
5 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
t C,T,
AVERAGE
A w C O A f C
CONCENTRATION CORRECTED ---"CALCULATED GRAMS/MINU
HC CO C02 NOX HC CO C02 M02
159
135
191
123
107
123
59b
158
?159
187
193
25b
173
127
118
b71
178
J031
187
258
301
178
129
173
b71
188
1959
181
255
271
173
122
Ibb
b15
178
i19
SUM---
O i iH
2337
1 l^b
1385
1139
1899
1532
7tbt
IbSB
2130
1501
1722
1753
18bS
15b3
7920
1817
1113
2095
125b
2Q?b
1818
17b7
1781
7729
1791
110S
20b2
1721
1755
Ib90
1577
lb5B
7273
1720
1382
,25 0
1,51 35
5,37 155
1,51 10
1,05 9
1,51 38
3,28 300
1,55 12
,17 0
,2b 1
1.51 38
2,13 180
1,51 11
1,09 11
1,51 1?
3,32 315
1.51 12
,18 0
,2b 1
1,51 33
2,10 185
1,55 13
1.09 11
1,55 13
3,32 320
1,58 17
,18 0
COMBOS ^
1,11 32
2.10 185
1,18 11
1,07 11
1,51 13
3.25 335
1,53 11
,17 0
/•nuone T TC
* L > L w C- u WT' r u ij i t L.
(COMPOSITE VALUES
/^/-.MinrteTTr UAI 1 1 C C
A V C K A u t o 1 1 IT' - — - v L. LJ '•" r- u a A ic VWL.VH-O
FOUR CYCLF COMPOSITE -
l.bb 19,0 82,0
1,11 25,1 199, 1
1,98 29,1 785,3
1,28 30.2 199,1
1,11 39,8 31b,b
1.28 32,2 199,1
b,19 15b,b 1088,0
l.bl 35,1 511,8
22,11 30,3 55,9
1,91 11,7 87,3
2,01 31,5 199,1
2,bh 3b,l 801,9
1,80 3b,8 199,2
1,32 39,1 3bO,3
1,51 32,8 199,1
b,97 Ibb, 2 1100,1
1,85 38,1 199,2
21,11 29, b bl.l
1,91 11,0 87,3
2,b8 2b,1 199,1
3,15 13, b 795,1
1,85 38,8 511,8
1.31 37.1 3bO,3
1,80 37,1 511,8
b,97 Ib2,2 1100,1
l,9b 37, b 522,7
20, 3b 29,5 bl,l
1.91 13.3 87,3
2,bS 3b,2 17b,l
2,82 3b,8 795,1
1,80 35,5 191,1
l,2b 33, 1 353,1
1,7? 31.8 199,2
b.71 152. b 107b,0
1,85 3b,l 50b,9
1,55 29,0 55, b
HC- FID 0,3S( 5,
CO- NDIR 0,3S( SO.
C02-NDIR 0,35( 113,
N02-CL 0.35( 2,
FUEL 0.35C 170.
FUEL CONSUMED = 12b,
.01
1.20
5,35
1.37
.31
1.32
10,37
l.tb
,00
,03
1.32
b,21
1.12
,3?
l.tt
10,89
i.lb
,01
.01
1.15
b,39
1,19
,38
1,*7
11, Ob
1,1.1
,01
.01
1,11
b.sq
1 ,12
,38
i ,tq
11.58
1.53
.01
2) •> 0
5) + Q
0) + 0
5) + 0
0) + 0
753
FUEL
51,81
171,32
2b4,17
173,73
130,22
171.70
127,12
181, bS
55,12
51, bt
175,11
271,53
177,51
131,39
175,29
13b,17
178, 2b
55,12
51,29
173,23
275, bt
183,51
133,10
182,78
131,17
185,50
51. 2b
50,91
170,82
271,91
171,11
129, Ib
17b,tb
121,89
179,70
33,18
,b5( 3,
,b5( 50,
,b5( 113,
,b5( ?,
,bS( ib9,
WT,
FACT,
.232
,077
.1*7
,077
,057
,077
,113
.077
,1*3
,232
,077
,1*7
,077
,057
,077
,113
,077
,113
,232
,077
,1*7
,077
,067
,077
,113
,077
,113
,232
,077
.117
,077
,057
,07?
,113
,077
,113
9) B t
q) B 50
7) B tt3
7) = 2
2) a lfc,9
---WEIGHTED GRAM3/MINUTE---
HC CO C02 NO? FUEL
,38
.11
.29
,10
,Ub
.10
,70
.13
3.21
5n p
, U 0
.15
.15
. 39
,1*
,08
, 12
,79
,1*
3,02
S3 0
t
,*5
.21
,tfa
.1*
,08
,1*
,79
,15
5? 3
1 S 3
,11
.20
,*1
.1*
,07
,13
,7b
,1*
,22
3 c -a
e , s 3
5,18
•a a ^
,3bb
,757
,178
,b20
.Ibb
11,*
1,"
*,3
2,3
2,3
2,5
17,7
2,7
1,3
U Q U
t 1 , •»
10,1
2,*
5,3
2,8
2.2
2.5
18.8
2,9
*,2
C \ 7
Si,/
10,2
2,0
b.t
3.0
2 , i
g, 9
18,3
2, q
i.a
C 3 1
52,1
10,0
1,8
5,*
2,7
1,9
2,7
17,2
2,8
11 a }
T T • f
50,5
c n a
n
38
115
38
20
38
123
to
8
u u n
T T U
eo
'it
118
38
21
38
121
38
9
U U U
™ ~ 0
20
38
117
to
21
to
181
10
9
H H 9
so
37
117
38
20
38
122
39
8
11 ^ Q
T 3 *1
3 U § T T T T
GRAMS/MINUTE
,00 12,0
,09 13,2
,?q 38,8
.11 13,1
,02 7,1
,10 13,5
1,17 18,3
,11 11,0
,00 7,9
«3 Q 1 L Q U
| -3 i lOOft
,01 12,0
,10 13,5
,qi to,*
,11 13,7
,02 7,7
.11 U,5
1,23 19,3
,11 13,7
,00 7,9
8k 1 171 U
1 D A 1 f 1 f O
,0i 11,9
,09 13,3
,91 10,5
,11 11,1
,02 7,b
,11 1*,1
1.25 19,1
,12 11,3
,00 -7,8
2,bb 178,7
,01 11.8
,09 13,2
,91 40,0
,11 U,*
,02 7,1
,11 13, b
1,31 47,7
,12 13,8
,00 1,8
8*1 1 t L C ^
,71 Ibb.b
2,50 170,0
2,b8 Ib9,2
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
MILLILITRES/MINUTE
O
-------
n
TABLE OB.
TRUCK 08 TEST 2 *-ll"75
MODE
I IDLt
2 lb HG
3 10 HC
* Ib HC
5 19 HG
b lb HG
7 3 HG
B ib HG
* C.T,
1 IDLE
2 lb HG
3 10 HC
* ib HG
s 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HC
B lb HG
9 C.T.
1 IDLE
2 lb HG
3 10 HG
H Ib HG
5 19 HC
b lb HG
7 3 HG
B lb HG
«» C.T,
1 IDLE
2 lb HG
3 10 HG
* lb HG
5 19 HG
b lb HC
7 3 HG
B lb HG
9 C.T.
AVERAGE
A I/ C O A P C
APPENDIX C-21
MASS EMISSION BY MODIFIED
DOOGt D2GAS 19b7
NINE-MODE FTP
5,9 LITRt VB GVW 10*33 KG HUM
CONCENTRATION CORRECTED ----CALCULATED GRAMS/MINU
HC CO C02 NOX HC CO C02 N02
b?7 1203 ,17
258 1218 1,17
23* *00 1,90
188 1*35 1.21
Ibb 2172 ,81
173 172* 1,17
b72 i*b73 2,32
28* 2*7* 1,17
jB03 *8B ,05
728 1*2* ,20
303 195b 1.17
2b2 *00 1.95
228 212* 1,19
20* 227b ,81
20b 1922 i.17
b72 l*bb* 2,35
33* 2b88 1,19
8bS3 bbl ,09
753 1*2* ,20
283 1*03 1,81
277 *83 1,9B
218 15b2 1,21
lb* Ib02 ,85
188 1309 1,2*
b72 ISli* 2,35
33* 27b3 1,17
J8B3 517 ,05
778 1*88 ,22
HOB 21S9 1,17
289 H83 1,98
218 15b2 1,21
17b 1570 .85
203 13H1 1,21
b?2 1H813 2,35
33* 27fa8 1.19
2828 517 .OS
_ ^ w P i t" f* n M D
SUM- -.(COMPOSITE
e i , u /r-rtkJOfteT TC
AvtRAlit ournw™— vuv'Tuoiic
FOUR CYCLE COMPOSITE -
0
80
390
70
3
bO
80
50
0
n c T T c
U O 1 I C
0
Sb
*30
75
2
b5
75
bO
0
n e T TB*
U o 1 1 t
0
99
*50
90
3
90
70
55
0
OSITE
1
90
**5
95
3
95
70
89
1
n c T T t
DO 1 1 1
VALUES
WAI 1 IP Q
V A u UC O
b,78 2b,2
2,79 2b,b
2,53 8,7
2,03 31,3
1,80 *7,*
1,87 37, b
7,2b 320.1
3. Ob S*,0
30,29 10, b
7,8b 31,1
3,28 *2,7
2.83 8,7
2,*7 *b,3
2,80 *9,7
2,22 Hi, 9
7,2b 320.0
3,bl 58.7
28,b7 1H.H
8.1* 31.1
3, Ob 30. b
2,99 10,5
2,3b 3*,i
1,77 35,0
2,03 28, b
7,27 329,8
3,bl bO,3
30,83 11,3
8,*1 32,5
H.HI H7.1
3,13 10,5
2,3b 3*,1
1,90 3*. 3
2,19 29,3
7.2b 323,2
3,bl bO,3
30, 5b 11,3
FOR CYCLES 1 AND 2!
FDR CYCLES 3 AND 4 '
HC- FID 0.3SC
CO- NDIR 0.35C
C02-NDIR 0,35(
N02-CL D,35(
FUEL 0,35(
57,9
*03,b
b5*,8
HiB.H
?78,H
H03,b
798, b
*03.8
lb,0
b8,8
*03,7
b72,9
Hll.l
278,5
*03, 7
eoe.b
*11 ,2
31, b
bB.B
H1B.H
bB2,0
H1B.H
291 ,b
H2S.8
808, b
*03,8
lb.0
7H.3
*03,7
bB2,0
H18.H
291, b
*18 , 3
808,b
*11,2
ib.O
B,
bl.
3*7,
2.
1*8,
,00
2, H9
12,11
2,17
,09
l,8b
2.HB
1,55
,00
.00
2 , b7
13,35
2,32
,0b
2,01
2.33
1.8b
,01
.01
3,07
13,97
2,79
,09
2,79
2,17
1,70
,01
,02
2,79
13,82
2,95
,09
2,95
2,17
2,7b
,02
1) » 0
7) + 0
8) + 0
8) + 0
*) * 0
FUEL
38,07
1*3,29
213, H8
1*9,55
113,1*
1*7,87
*17,9H
157,21
HO.bl
HH.97
151,80
219, H7
155, 1H
llH.bS
150,38
H21.00
Ib2,*2
*5,79
*5,2*
150,25
223, HI
151, 2b
111,11
150, 5H
H2S.89
lbO,90
*l,*b
H7.93
155, lb
223.5H
151, 2b
110,90
1*8,70
*22,b8
Ib3,21
*1,19
,b5( 8
,bS( bi
,b
-------
TRUCK 0"* TEST
APPENDIX C-21
TA8LE 09. MASS EMISSION BY MODIFIED MINE-MODE FTP
*-2*-75 IHC D3GAS 1971 S,7 LITRE V8
181** KG HUM = 10,0 G/KG
MODE
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
* Ib HG
5 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
1 C.T,
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
* Ib HG
5 19 H G
b Ifa HG
7 3 HG
8 Ifa HG
9 C,T,
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
* Ib HG
5 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
^ C.T,
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
* Ib HG
5 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
* C.T,
AVERAGE
AVERAGE
CO^CENTRAT ION CORRECTED CALCULATED C.RAMS/MINU
HC CO CO? NQX HC CO C02 N02
*b
15?
238
1 32
81
127
311
1*2
95b
5b
1*3
23b
128
79
128
Sbl
IfaH
95b
59
1*8
2*1
130
7h
133
887
IbB
931
52
155
251
1*0
fib
138
JbbO
3*3
981
SljM...
Si |M---
175H
1019
109b
1H19
in? 3
989
251*
1078
1189
Ib93
1078
1335
1078
1205
1078
2*SO
1078
1281
1758
1108
1397
1078
117*
1108
2***
1137
1312
1791
1138
13t>5
1078
117*
1108
1795
1078
1251
.2* 1
1.1* 79
1.75 289
1.1* 99
. 8b 2*
1,1* 9*
2,*0 30*
1,1* 99
, Ib 0
r n M D n c T T c
tUw^Uol It
.2* 1
l.lb 79
1.77 279
l.lb 99
.8* 1*
1, Ib 9*
2,*0 299
l.lb 99
.18 0
r n MD n Q T T c
L U Wr* U O J. It
.2* 1
l.lb 8*
1.77 279
l.lb 10*
,8* 1*
l.lb 9H
2.*2 309
1.18 109
,18 1
rnMDDQ T T F
LU^rUal 't
.25 1
l.lb 89
1,80 28*
l.lb 10*
,8b 19
l.lb 9*
2,09 2b*
1 , Ib 99
,lh 1
/*o»»rancTTc
(COMPOSITE VALUES
(Co^Pnr*'"" ""'"""
31 It V « u 'J C a
FOUR CYCLF COMPOSITE -
,*8 3b,b
1,57 21,2
2,*5 22,8
1 ,3b 21,2
.8* 21.9
1.31 20, b
3,21 52,*
l.*7 22.5
9,8b 2*, 8
,58 35,3
l.*7 22,*
2,** 27,8
1,32 22,*
,81 25,1
1,32 22,*
8,89 51, b
1.73 22,*
9,8b 2b,7
,bl 3b,b
1.52 23.1
2.*9 29,1
1,3* 22,*
.78 2*. 5
1.37 23,1
9,15 50,9
1,73 23,7
9,bl 27,3
,53 37.3
l.bO 23.7
2,59 28,*
1,*5 22,*
,89 2* ,*
l.*2 23.1
37.7b 37,*
3,5* 22,*
10,12 2b,0
FOR CYCLES 1 AND 2)
C n O P V f* 1 t" Q 3 AKJH U ^
run L-TLLtO J Ml^y t;
HC- FID 0,35(
CO- NDIR 0,35(
C02-NDIR 0,35(
N02-CL 0,35(
FUEL 0,3S(
FUEL CONSUMED =
77,7
37*, 1
575,2
37*. 1
283, B
37*. 1
788,1
37*. 1
53.*
77.7
381,2
583,0
381,2
277,1
381,2
788,5
381,2
59,5
77,7
381,2
583,0
381,2
277,0
381.2
797,1
388,*
59.5
83,8
381,2
590,9
381,2
283,8
381,2
b87,9
381,2
53.*
3
29
332
3
122
92
,03
2,b*
9,bS
3, 30
,80
3. I1*
10.15
3, 30
,01
,03
2,b*
9,3?
3,30
,*b
3,1*
9,99
3. 30
.01
,03
2,80
9,32
3,*7
,*b
3.1*
10,32
3,b*
.03
,03
2.97
9,*8
3,*7
,b3
3,1*
8,82
3,30
,0*
,1) + 0
,7) + Q
,b) + n
,5) + 0
.7) + 0
,blt
FUFL
*3.1*
130.12
195,25
129,9?
) 01 ,2h
129, 5b
277,93
130, b*
38,99
*2,Sb
132,88
200, 18
132,72
100. b7
112,72
283,27
133,1*
*1,85
*3,27
133,2*
200, 8b
132,75
100,32
133,09
285,88
13b,01
*1,92
*5,*b
133, b3
203,13
132,85
102,57
133,1*
273,3*
13*. 9b
39,89
,bS( 5
,bS( 30
,bS( 330
,b5C 3
,b5( 12*
wT.
FACT,
.232
,077
.1*7
.077
,057
.077
,113
,077
.1*3
,?32
,077
,1*7
,077
,057
,077
,113
,077
,1*3
,232
,077
,1*7
,077
,057
,077
,113
,077
,1*3
,232
,077
,1*7
,077
,057
,077
,113
,077
.1*3
,?) = *.
,1) = 29,
,7) = sn,
,5) s 3,
,*) = 123,
.--wFIGHTE!
HC CO
.11 8,5
,12 l,b
,3fa 3,*
.11 l.b
,05 1,3
,10 l.b
,3b 5,9
,11 1.7
l.*l 3,5
2-J 3 3 Q 1
• ' * C " | A
,13 8.2
.11 1.7
,3fa *,1
.10 1,7
,05 1,*
,10 1,7
1,00 5,8
.13 1,7
1 ,*1 3,8
3u n 3 n ^
f T U 3 l 1 ( 3
,1* 8,5
,12 1,8
.3? *,3
.10 1.7
,0* 1,*
.11 1,8
1,03 5,8
.13 1.8
1.37 3.9
3u 3 'a n o
| T C J U ) 1
.12 8,7
,12 1,8
,38 *,2
.11 1,7
,05 1.*
.11 1.8
*,27 *,2
.57 1,7
l.*5 3,7
bU Q 3 Q 3
1 O M C T § C
3,07 29,7
51 c in l
, 1 b 30,1
) GRAMS/MJNUTE---
C02 N02 FUEL
IB
29
85
29
Ib
29
89
29
8
•a -a i
j J I
18
29
8b
29
Ib
29
89
29
9
q q c
3 3 3
18
29
8b
29
Ib
29
90
30
9
"a 3 L.
330
19
29
87
29
Ib
29
78
29
8
^ 3 C
j e b
333
331
,01 10,0
,20 10,0
1,*2 28,7
,25 10,0
,05 5,8
,2* 10,0
1,15 31,*
,25 10,1
,00 5,b
3C T 131 C
t ~ r J. C 1 | 3
.01 9,9
,20 10,2
1,37 29, H
,25 10,2
.03 5,7
,2* 10,2
1,13 32,0
,25 10,3
,00 b,0
3u Q i a u n
|TT 1 C T | U
,01 10,0
,22 10,3
1,37 29,5
,27 10,2
,03 5,7
,2* 10,2
1,17 32,3
,28 10,5
,00 fa,0
3C Q 1 3 U Q
t 3 O i C t ( 8
,01 10,5
,23 10,3
1,39 29,9
,27 10,2
,OH 5,8
,2* 10.3
1,00 30,9
,25 10,*
,01 5.7
3,*3 12*, 0
3,53 122,7
3,50 12*,*
*23 GRAMS/MINUTE
951 GRAMS/MINUTE
339 GRAMS/MINUTE
5i3 GRAMS/MINUTE
sib GRAMS/MINUTE
MILLILITRES/MINUTE
O
I
U>
-------
APPENDIX C-21
o
TRUCK 10 TES
MODE
1 IDLE
? i L HG
i in HG
M i b nn
5 in HG
b i b HG
7 3 Hr,
8 IL HG
i C.T'.
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 111 HG
4 ib HG
5 11 HG
h 1 b H G
7 3 HG
B ib HG
1 C.T.
j IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 IU HG
4 Ib HG
s 11 HG
b ib HG
7 3 HG
8 ib HG
i C..T'.
j IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
4 Ib HG
s 11 HG
h ib HG
7 3 HG
8 It HG
1 C.T.
AVF.RAGF
TA8LC J0-
T 2 4-28-75
MASS EMISSION BY MODIFIED
IHC TT GAS 1174
NINE-MODE FTP
7.B LIT"E VB GVW 20412 KG HUM
CONCENTRATION CORRECTED - — -CALCULATED G"A"S/"INll
HC CO C02 NOX HC CO C02 N02
172
1 bl)
251
Jh7
1 OB
133
•I7B
20P
1 1 38
1 hi)
180
274
J55
Jib
148
503
113
1138
152
173
2b9
158
131
14B
503
193
1J38
JB9
183
271
155
123
148
503
113
1113
b72
414
7bb
577
bb5
541
4548
8bl
58b
751
541
822
b33
b13
57b
4543
890
585
SIR
b05
738
bbl
750
577
4589
810
b43
p V P 1 C
•L Y C L t
751
faOS
519
b33
750
541
4503
803
b7?
r* v f i r*
.23 1
1.37 74
2.18 401
1.39 94
1.M2 1
1.42 81
3.11 539
1.42 14
.28 n
COMPOSITE
.25 0
1.44 81
2,21 434
1.44 11
1.117 1
1.4b 104
3. lh 54H
1 , 4 h .1 0 *
,3U 1
.23 1
1.42 84
2,23 444
1.42 104
1.U4 9
1.44 99
3,14 541
1.4b 109
.30 1
PAUDHQTTP
L-UnrUo I 1 1
.23 1
1,42 81
2.21 424
1.39 91
1.02 9
1,42 94
3.14 499
1.44 114
,30 1
/^mjEanoTTer
SUM— (COMPOSITE VALUES
ft . i u _._ fr*r\itnr\t**Tr" uii 111— r»
AVCRAGE oun— — — v L unr-^o i IL V^LUUO
FOUR CYCLE COMPOSITE -
2.41 19.0 101,8
2.24 14.0 b!2,8
3,fa3 21.7 175,3
2,35 Jb.3 022.9
1.52 18.8 45b,H
l.Bh 15.5 1,32,1
(,.b9 128.1. 1387. b
2.11 24.4 1,33,0
15.13 Ib.b 127,1
2.23 21. 5 110,2
2.52 15.5 b43.l
3.84 23.2 1H21.0
2,17 17.1 b43,l
I.b2 11. b 475.1
2.07 lb.3 b53,2
7.05 128.5 1413, b
?.70 25.2 bS3,3
15.94 Ib.U 135,5
2.13 23.1 101,1
2.42 17.1 b33,U
3.77 20.1 918,0
2.21 18.7 b33.0
1.83 21.2 4bb.4
2.07 lb.3 b43.1
7.05 131.8 l'*00,b
2.7D 55.2 b53,3
15.14 18.2 135.5
2.b5 21.5 101,9
2,5b 17.1 b33,0
3.91 lb.9 18b,b
2.17 17.1 b22.1
1.73 21.2 45b,1
2.07 15,5 b32,i
7.04 127.3 1400,5
P. 70 22.7 b43,l
15.51 19.0 135,5
HC- FID 0.35C 5,
CO- NDIR 0.3GC 31,
C02-NDIR 0.35C 571,
N02-CL 0.35C 7.
FUEL 0.35C 20U.
.00
3.41
18.81
4.34
.41
4.11
24.10
4.34
.02
.0]
4.11
20.04
4.57
.41
4.80
25.13
4.80
.03
.02
3.87
20.51
4.80
.41
4.57
25. 3b
5.03
.04
.04
t.ll
11.58
4.57
.*!
4.34
23.05
5.2b
.05
o) + n
b) + 0
n + o
0) + 0
8) + 0
FUEL
43. Ib
202.52
322.09
2 ru. , M h
154'. HB
201. 2b
508.28
P14.71
b4.24
*7.M
213.11
337f 50
213.15
1 b 1 . 4 9
21b.2S
5 1 b . 7 5
221,30
bb.81
45.73
21o'.bl
329.01
211.11
151,50
213.05
513.29
221J.30
b?.70
45,43
210.75
323.59
207.58
15b.40
209'. *7
512,08
21b.88
f>7. 75
,b5( 5
,b5( 32
,b5( 5b9
,b5( 7
.bsf 200
FACT^
,232
.077
', 077
.057
.077
.113
.077
.143
.23?
,077
.147
.077
.057
.'-'77
.113
.077
.143
.232
.077
,147
.077
.057
.077
.113
.077
.1*3
.232
,077
.147
.077
.057
.077
,113
.077
,143
,0) s
.1) =
9 b ) =
,i) =
.b) =
= 10
.5 G/KG
WEIGHTED GRAMS/MINUTE — -
HC CO C02 N02 FUEL
,5b
.17
,53
, ' P
.09
.14
,7b
.2P
2,28
U 03
T , 1 J
,52
.11
,57
.17
,01
.Ib
.81.1
.21
2,28
40 Q
t * "
,49
.11
.55
.17
,1U
,lb
,80
.21
2,28
t f 9 5
!ao
.57
.17
,10
»lb
.80
.21
2.23
5n u
* u t
4,1b
5 f 0 U
4,183
31,138
570.017
7,098
200, b9H
4,4
1.1
3.2
1.3
1.1
1.2
1'I.S
1.1
•a t n
J J. f ' 1
5.0
1,2
3.1
1,4
1,1
1.3
14,5
1.1
2,4
'a "J 3
J C j C
5,4
1.3
3,1.
1.4
) .2
1.3
14.7
1,1
2,b
•33 Q
3?, 1
5,0
1,3
2.5
l.H
1.2
1.2
14.4
1.7
2.7
•a i u
J J. .1
31, b
"3D 1
24 .00
47 .2b
J*3 2.78
4P ,33
2 b . n s
41 .32
157 2. 81
49 .33
18 .on
C ( 1 L 0 1
3 u X O . O U
2b .00
50 .32
150 2,95
50 .35
27 .02
50 .37
1 b 0 2.84
50 .37
11 ,00
24 !oi
41 .30
147 3.01
41 .37
27 .02
50 .35
158 2.87
50 .31
11 .01
C T 3 T 33
572 7.32
24 .01
41 .32
145 2.88
48 .35
2b .0?
49 .33
J58 2. bO
SO .41
19 .01
C L. *> L. Q 3
3 a f O e ' Cl
571 7.04
r- T r» t 11
Jc.l DfL' r.i.3
GRAMS/MINUTE
10.2
15. h
47.3
15.9
B.fi
lb.1
57.4
Ib.S
1.2
197 P
J. 1 f . f
11. J
lb.4
41. fa
lb.5
1.2
lb.7
58.4
17.0
l.b
P n u u
C U " | "
10, b
lb.2
48,4
lb.3
1.)
lb.4
58,0
17.0
1.7
3 n i T
c U 1 . 7
10.5
lb.2
47. b
lb.0
8.1
lb.1
57.1
lb.7
1.7
1 Q Q L
11M . b
200.8
P n n k
C U '.' ft b
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
FUEl CONSUMED = 150.111 MILI.ILITRES/MINUTE
-------
o
TABLE U.
TRUCK 11 TEST a 5-13-75
MODE
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 JLU HG
4 Ib HG
5 iq HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
R Ib MG
q C.T.
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 lu HG
4 Ib HG
5 iq HG
b Xb HG
7 3 Hr,
8 Ib MR
q C.T.
1 IDLE
? ib HG
3 1U HG
4 ib HG
s iq HG
b ib HG
7 3 HG
a ib HG
q C.T.
1 IDLE
? ib HG
3 1U HG
4 It HG
5 iq HG
h ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
q C.T'.
AVERAGF
CONCEN
HC
158
iuq
,104
q4
b
84
3b3
1C 'I
Sfafl
4 R
114
207
qb
1
8b
353
14
843
45
101
i sq
8b
-11
84
35]
11
818
an
14
181
7b
-24
4b
348
84
818
APPENDIX C-21.
MASS EMISSION BY MODIFIED
CHEVROLET D2GAS 1174
NINE-MODE FTP
b.O LITRE V8 GVW 18518 KG HUM = 8
'TRATION CORRECTED CALCULATED GRAMS/MINN
co coa NOX HC co coa Noa
522 .22 0
1125 ,8q 21
1385 1.45 135
1005 .81 25
108 ,b5 4
1005 .Sq 23
24bb 2.17 335
1155 .81 24
4bb .15 0
• rvri F" rnMpn^TTF
" l- < v u u l^unr'uoi til
401 .24 0
13b1 ,81 18
1811 1,48 140
ioq4 ,qi 23
1. 0 8 . b 7 5
1J54 ,qi 22
2b4l a. 17 335
iais ,eq ea
438 .17 n
ppYn F rnwpn^TTF
I-ILUL. Lunruoilu
4oi ,a4 o
i4ba .Rq iq
Ibb? 1.45 135
1185 .qi 23
108 .b? 5
1337 ,H 21
asqi a. 17 335
1338 .81 33
4bb .17 0
• P V f* ) P" rflMPfl^TTF"
L, i L. L t- L. U n r U CS i It-
382 ,24 0
I4b2 ,aq 11
ISbO 1.45 135
.1307 .81 ai
135 ,b? b
1307 ,81 21
3187 2.15 310
J 3b1 ,81 22
410 .17 0
SLIM— (COMPOSITE VALUES
n i < 11 fnnnr\f*ir>-r^r- \/AI lir~O
AVERAGE OU^ — — — VLUn^uoiiL v n L_ u l_ o
FOUR CYCLE COMPOSITE -
2.28 15.2
1.57 32. R
2.14 40.4
1.35 ?1.3
. U 8 3.2
1.21 2q.3
5.24 7 1 .1
1 . 5 n 3 3 . t
12.52 13.0
.bl 11.1
l.bS 31.1
2,18 55.1
1,31 31. q
,ui 3. a
1.25 33. b
5.10 7b.q
1.35 35.4
la.lb 12.8
,bs n. q
1.57 4a.b
a. 73 48. b
1.25 34.5
.17 3.2
1.21 31. U
S.Ob 84.2
1,32 3q.O
11.80 13. b
.21 11. I
i,3b 4a.b
a. 73 54.2
1.10 38.1
.35 3.1
.b? 38.1
5.03 12.1
1.21 31.1
ii.so 11 .q
FOR CYCLES J AND 2)
COD P V P 1 C* Q -1 A M n U ^
r U K L T L, L. u. o -* H FV L/ i j
HC- FID 0.35(
co- NDIR o.35(
C02-NOIR 0.35(
N02-CL 0.35(
FUEL 0.35C
] n 3 , 4
'1 01,1
fibl.l
' 0 1 . R
2 1 7 , b
4 o q . q
qqq.4
4 nq, q
bi.b
111,1
4oq,q
b71, b
4 1 q , 4
snfa.s
4 iq , 4
qqq.5
4 pq.q
78,1
111,1
4in,o
bbq,i
4 1 q . 4
30b,8
411.5
qqq.s
4 01, q
78,1
111.1
401,1
bbl.l
4ni, q
3 n b , 8
4 n q , q
188,0
4 o i , q
78,0
3
30
311
a
142
.02
!l3
b.U5
1.11
. 18
1.02
15.04
1.0 I-
,on
.(12
.81
b.2R
1.U2
.23
.17
1 5 . U 4
.qq
.00
.02
.84
b.OS
1.04
.23
.15
15.04
1.04
.00
.0?
.84
b.OS
. 15
.25
.13
13.12
. qq
.00
,b) + 0
.1) + 0
.si t n
,q) + o
.5) + 0
FUEL
42.4"
147. 15
2 3 4 . n 5
I'IS.ll
1 5 . 5 b
14 5. US
35b.21
147.51
41.23
4 1 . q 1
150. 7b
244,73
141.54
18.38
150. 2b
35?. bn
148.24
43. 12
4! ,8R
152.05
237. q2
150.70
18.20
152.88
3b3.J1
141,11
43.17
4 1 . .1 1
15l'.83
240.72
I4l'.32
18.41
148.81
3b2.71
150.33
42.35
,bSf 1
,b5( 34
,b5( 312
.b5( 2
,b5C 143
HT.
FACT.
.232
.077
.147
,n?7
.057
.077
.113
.077
.143
.232
.077
.147
.077
.057
.077
.113
.077
.143
.232
.077
.It?
.077
.057
.077
.113
.n77
.143
.232
.077
.147
.077
.0??
,077
.113
.077
.its
.1) = 3.
.3) = 33,
.3) = aqa.
.8) = 2,
.1) = 143.
.7 G/KG
WEIGHTED GRAMS/MINUTE- —
HC CO C02 N02 FUEL
.53
.12
,43
.in
,00
.nq
.sq
.1?
1.71
3,78
!l3
,44
,11
.no
.10
.58
.10
1.74
!l5
.12
.40
.10
.01
.oq
.57
.10
33 -j
, ccf
.07
.10
,40
.08
.02
,05
.57
.oq
T 04
3,57
31 -3
,13
281
125
100
8b7
3.5
2.5
5.1
2.3
,2
2.3
8.1
2 . H
1.1
a!"
3.1
8,1
2.5
.2
2.b
8.7
2,7
1.8
2^8
3.3
7.1
2.7
.2
3.0
1.5
3.0
1.1
q ti c
d J, 5
a.b
3.3
8.0
2 , q
,2
2,1
10,5
3.1
1.7
3nll
^ U ^
24
32
qR
32
17
3i?
] 13
32
10
•300
J O
-------
n
TRUCK
MOOF
] IDLE
? ] b H G
3 J u HG
4 i b H r.
5 J i Mr.
I- 11 »r.
7 3 HG
s ) i HG
1 C.T.
J IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 in HG
4 ib HG
5 11 "G
(- 11 HG
7 3 HG
8 1L HG
i C.T'.
1 IDLE
? J b HG
3 J.U HG
4 Ib HG
5 11 HG
h Ib HG
7 3 HG
B It HG
1 C.T.
J IDLE
2 XL HG
3 111 HG
4 Ib HG
5 11 HG
b Jb HG
7 3 HG
B 11 HG
i C.T'.
AVERAGE
* u r~ D i /- c
TABLC 12
LS TEST ? 5-14-75
APPENDIX c-zi
MASS CMISSION 8Y "OOIFTEO
FORD TTGAS 1172
7.8 LI
CONCENTRATION CORRECTED --— C ALCUL ATEO GPAMS/MINU
HC CO CO? NOX HC CO CO? NO?
b'j
282
41 b
21?
PPC
3i;2
b2U
31 4
153L,
121
3b?
4 b7
321!
?48
314
fa45
332
iCfal
124
375
412
327
?58
327
b7U
334
Ifcll
144
415
412
334
2b3
335
b70
342
14bl
] 075
31fa3
3870
4081
351''
4 J ?1
831P
431b
1075
4470
*3b8
"331
D8b 1
4?9b
8b1 b
4311
b7l
- r v n F
i- T u i_ u
1045
4bB1
4S40
44?7
318b
4382
B723
431 b
bbS
n f* Y f* 1 P
•U T L L C.
113b
41lb
4b21
44?7
3Bb2
4555
81?1
4^fa1
b14
A* W f- 1 f
,11 0
.18 27
l.bb 145
.15 28
. b1* e
, OR 30
2.35 155
.11 ?»j
. 1 'J 0
.17 1
,18 2?
l.bb 145
l.H'J 31
. b^ 7
l.'i'j ?R
2.38 155
l.nu 28
.10 0
rnMpnQTTF
l^Unr^UOl 1 C
.11 1
,18 25
l.bb 135
.18 2b
,b7 fa
l.MO 21
2.35 145
.18 28
,'|R 0
.11 0
,15 23
l.b't 135
.18 23
.b? 7
l.nu es
2.35 135
.18 23
.1? 0
/*rtk*ooe> TTC1
SUM (COMPOSITE VALUES
ct r i i_j . _^^fftni*nr\ov'*c VIAI i i ^ e>
AVERAGE ou^ — — — v UUTUO i i t. v^u^no
FOUR CYCLE COMPOSITE -
.14 3l.il B5.5
4.0? 1J4.1 4 43 . b
5.14 111.4 75b,U
4,Jb J17.R 434. n
3.22 ll'l.q 312.1
4.31 118.9 4 -I 3 . b
8.84 231. fa 11170.3
4.41 J ? 4 . ? 4 4 3 , t,
21.11 11.3 "4,1
1.73 3l.il 77,1
S.lb J58.7 443,b
b.bb J2S.8 75b,J
4.5fa J25.U 453.2
3.54 111.? 313, U
4.41 123.7 '153,2
=1.20 2*8.1 1'IR2.2
4,74 12b.5 453,2
22.27 11,3 4-1,1
1.7b 30.1 85.5
5.34 135.1 443,7
7.H1 130.8 75fa,l
4 . b b J 2 7 . 5 4 4 3 , b
3,b1 114.8 303,1
4.bb 12b.2 453,2
I.Sfa 251.2 11170.*
4.77 124.3 443.b
22. 1? 11.2 35,1
2.05 32.7 85,5
5.11 J * 1 . I 434.2
7.01 133.3 745,5
4.77 127.5 443, b
3.7b 111.2 303,1
4.77 131.2 453,2
1.5b 257.1 11170,4
4.88 128.7 443, b
20. 8* ?n,n 52,*
HC- FID 0.35C 7
CO- NDIR 0.35C 18
C02-*DT« 0.35( 413
N02-CL 0.35C _.. 2
FUEL 0.35C IBb
FUEL CONSUMED s 14U
,IH
i!so
8.IJ3
l.Sfc
.45
1 ,U4
R.58
1.4?
.01
.0*
1J47
8.03
1.72
.3°
1 . 5b
8,58
J ,5b
.01
.03
1.31
7.47
J.45
.3*
l.bl
8.03
l.Sb
,00
.113
1.28
7.47
1,53
.31
1.53
7.47
1,28
.01
.0) + 0
.7) + 0
,1) + 0
.7) + 0
,3) + 0
.8Mb
OOF FTP
T « r y 8 r*
FUEL
4 V. ? b
200.55
211.71
111.41
152.41
203. ?2
* b 5 . 3 1
2 0 '., . 0 B
45.41
41.42
20B'.1b
307.57
201.41
157,4?
?08.91
4 7 3 . fa b
210.42
45.77
43',bb
21?. 21
310,31
207,84
15b^4 1
210,22
471.82
20b,37
43.81
45.24
213'.10
308,32
207.15
154'.71
212,81
474.78
208^bb
*7.27
,b5C 7
.b5( 104
,b5( 411
,b5( 2
,b5( 181
vw 20*12 KG
HT.
FACT.
.23?
.077
,147
.077
.057
.077
.11?
.077
.143
.23?
.077
.I1*?
.077
.057
.077
,113
,077
.143
.232
.077
,147
,077
,057
,077
,113
,077
,143
.232
,077
.147
.077
.057
.077
.113
,077
,143
.*) » 7,
.8) » 102.
,8) a 412,
.4) = 2,
.3) = 188.
HUM = 15
.2 G/KC,
WEIGHTED GPAMS/MIM
HC CO cnp NO?
,??
.31
.87
.32
.IE
.33
1,00
.35
3,13
b"5 1
• * •*•
,*()
.40
.18
.35
• ?<.'
.35
1,0*
,3b
3.18
7 PI,
f , C U
. *1
1.03
,3b
,21
,3b
1,08
.37
3,21
T c 1
' . 3 '
,*b
1.03
.3?
,21
.37
1,08
.38
2,18
"? ^ ^
fa'll
7U ^
• t J
£7h
bSl
2b5
523
2*3
7.?
e.e
lb.4
1.1
? . P
1.2
27,1.
l.t.
2.8
Q C Q
Hb , 8
7.2
1.1
18.5
9,b
t. 3
1.5
28,0
1.7
i n i L
J. U X y O
7,0
10,4
11.2
1,8
b,5
1.7
28,4
l.b
2,7
1 ft ^ U
1 U 3 » T
7,b
10,1
11, b
1.8
b,3
I'1.!
21. J
1.1
\ n t 3
1 U b , r.
18,7
?0 .00
34 . 12
111 1.18
33 .1?
IP .03
34 .13
121 .17
3* .11
b .00
u i 3 y k c
Tic C « D a
IB .01
34 .11
111 1.1B
35 .13
18 .02
35 .1?
122 ,17
35 .12
^ ,00
11 1 tl p L T
T X ™ C . D f
20 .01
34 .11
1 1 I 1,10
3* ,11
17 ,02
35 .12
121 ,11
3* .12
"5 ,00
U 1 3 y 4 Q
" A C C p T *1
20 .01
33 .10
110 1.10
34 .12
17 .02
3S .12
121 ,84
34 ,10
7 .00
413 2^bfa
U » 1 ^ 11 1"
104,8 tic c.ia
GRAMS/MINUTE
ITE —
FUf L
10.0
15.4
44.1
15 . 4
9.7
1. 5. b
52.1-
15.1
i a u 3
X O " 9 C
H 1 1»
ib.i
45.2
lb.1
q.n
lb.1
53.5
lb.2
IRQ >l
X O 1 % *
10.1
lb.3
45. b
lb.0
8.3
lb.2
53.3
15.1
IRQ t
J. D n t t
10. S
lb.4
*5.3
lfa.0
8.8
lb.4
53. b
lb.1
fa. 8
1 Q a Q
J. a 1 1 "
18b,3
1 Q Q 3
i a H » 3
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/
MIMUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
MILLILITRES/MINUTE
-------
o
TRUCK j
MODE
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
* Ib HG
5 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
1 C,T.
1 IDLE
2 ib HG
3 10 HG
* Ib HG
5 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
B Ib HG
1 C.T.
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
* Ib HG
5 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
9 C,T,
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HC
* Ib HG
5 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
1 C,T.
AVERAGE
AVERAGE
TABLt 13.
.3 TEST 1 5.es.7^
APPENDIX C-21
MASS fcMlSSIUN BY MODIFIED
CMC TTGAS 197.*
NINE-MODE FTP
7,0 LITRt VB UV
CONCENTRATION CORRECTED ----C ALCUL A TtD GRAMS/MJNU
HC CO C02 NOX HC CO C02 N02
12* b2b
139 1*72
l*b ";53
59 *77
10 7fa
51 3b8
3*7 382*
89 b72
909 570
119 7b9
lib 989
173 719
9* 757
20 182
81 b**
3b7 *b58
9* 700
859 5*2
13* 91b
129 107b
183 889
99 728
25 129
8b b**
31.9 *923
101 785
88* 5*2
1*1 b5S
13b 122b
191 10b2
10* 8*3
15 102
8b 700
39? 5237
111 81*
93* 599
_ p v r i c
,22 0
1,02 *0
1 ,bB 2**
l.Ob **
.7? b
l.Ob *9
2,*3 35*
1,08 5*
,15 0
r n MD n c T T c
L U ~ r U O 1 't
.22 0
1,0* **
1,71 2*9
1,08 5*
, 77 9
1,08 5*
2,*0 31*
1,08 58
,15 0
,22 0
l.Ob 50
1,71 259
1.08 *9
,77 9
1,08 57
2,*0 309
1.08 58
,15 0
.22 1
l.Ob *b
1,73 25*
1.08 57
.75 7
1.08 5*
2.*3 30*
1.08 bO
.15 0
^ o kin r» e T TC
S'|M---(COMPOSITE VALUES
SUM- --(COMPOSITE VALUES
FOUR CYCLE COMPOSITE •
1.78 18,2
2,00 *2,9
2.10 lb.1
,B5 13.9
.1* 2.2
.7* 10,7
5,00 111,*
1,28 l^.fa
13,11 Ib.b
1.71 22,*
l.bB 28, B
2,50 20,9
1.35 22.0
.29 b.3
1.17 18,7
5,29 135,7
1.35 20.*
12,39 15,8
1.93 2b,7
l.Bb 31,*
2,b5 25,9
1,*3 21,2
,3b 3,7
1,25 18.7
5,33 1*3.*
l,*b 22,9
12,75 15,8
2,0* 19,1
1.97 35,7
2,7b 30,9
1,50 2*, 5
.22 3.0
1.25 20,*
5,bb 152,5
l.bl 23.7
13, *7 17,*
FOR CYCLES 1 AND 2
FOR CYCLES 3 AND *
HC« FID 0,3S(
CO- NDIR 0.3SC
C02-MDIR 0,35(
N02-CL 0.35C
FUEL 0.35C
FUEL CONSUMED
103.*
*b7.5
77*. 7
*8b,8
33*. 3
*8b, S
1117, b
*9b, 7
b9,b
103,*
*77,2
785,5
*9b, 7
353,0
*9b,7
1105,7
*9b,7
b9,b
103.*
*8b,9
785, b
*9b,7
353,0
*9b,7
1105,7
*9b, 7
b9,b
103,*
*87,0
79b,5
*9b,7
3*3, b
*9fa,7
1117,8
*9b, 7
b9,b
3
30
***
*
158
= 120
.02
1,93
11. b9
2.12
,28
2.3b
lb,9b
2,bO
,02
,02
2,12
11,13
2,58
,**
2,bO
15,05
2.79
,02
,02
2,38
12. *1
2,3b
,**
2,72
1*,81
2.77
.02
.02
2,22
12,17
2,7*
.33
2,bO
1*,57
2,89
.02
,b) * 0
,7) * 0
,2) + 0
,3) + 0
,9) 4 0
.173
FUEL
* 3 , * i
170,77
25*. 52
Ibl .35
lOb, 7*
159, bb
*12,8*
Ib7,b9
*3,31
*5,**
lfab,51
2bO,7*
Ib9,00
11*. 28
Ib7,18
*21,*2
lbS.18
*2,17
*7,77
171,05
2b3,35
IbB.bb
1U.59
lb?,?5
*25,29
Ib9,52
*2,53
ff ,10
173,32
2b9,39
170,39
110,12
Ib8,07
*33,9B
170,08
**,08
,b5( 3,
,b5( 3b,
,b5( **7,
,b5( *,
,b5f Ib3,
W 20*12 KG HUM = 10
WT,
FACT,
,232
,077
.1*7
,077
,057
.077
.113
,077
.1*3
.232
.077
,1*7
,077
.057
,077
.113
,077
.1*3
.232
,077
,1*7
.077
,057
,077
.113
,077
,1*3
,232
,077
.1*7
,077
,057
,077
,113
.077
.1*3
8) = 3
*) s 3*
9) = *i»b
3) = *
2) = Ibl
,7 G/KG
---WEIGHTED GRAMS/MINUTE---
HC CO C02 N02 FUEL
,*1
.15
,31
.07
,01
,0b
.57
,10
1.B7
•3 c C
!*o
.13
.37
.10
.02
,09
,bO
.10
1.77
3C Q
, 3 B
.1*
.39
.11
.02
.10
,bO
.11
1,82
91 U.
1 f *
!l5
,*1
,12
,01
,10
,b*
.12
3Q U
. 9*
3.5b
3.8*
,7**
,*27
,blb
,298
,728
*.2
3.3
2.*
1.1
.1
.8
12, b
1,5
2,*
3 Q U
C B t T
5.2
2.2
3.1
1.7
.3
1 , *
15,3
1 , b
^ u i
33 , 1
b,2
2.*
3.8
lib
,2
1.*
lb,2
1,8
"J C Q
J5 , 9
*,*
2,7
f.s
1 , 9
.2
1 , b
17.2
1.8
2,5
3 l_ Q
J fa , 9
30,7
3b,*
2*
3b
11*
37
19
37
12b
38
10
ti U 3
*» t C
2*
37
US
38
20
38
125
38
10
u n L
* T D
2*
37
115
38
20
38
125
38
10
f H 7
2*
37
117
38
20
38
12b
38
10
* * 9
***
**8
,00 10,1
.15 13,1
1,72 37,*
, Ib 12,*
,02 b.l
,18 12,3
1,92 *b,7
,20 12,9
,00 b,2
,00 10,5
,lb 12,8
1.75 38,3
,20 13,0
,03 b,5
,20 12,9
1,70 *7,fa
.21 12,9
,00 b,0
Ho L i u n i
|CD 1 O U | r
.00 11,1
,18 13,2
1,82 38,7
,18 13,0
,03 b,5
,21 12,9
I,b7 *8,1
.21 13,1
,00 b,l
U "33 t C 3 C
*,je lbe,b
,01 10,2
.17 13,3
1,79 39, b
.21 13,1
,02 b,3
,20 12,9
l.bS *9,0
.22 13,1
,00 b,3
*,27 lb*,0
*,31 158,9
*,29 Ib3,2
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
MILLILITRES/MINUTE
-------
APPENDIX C-21
n
TABLE 14.
TRUCK 1* TEST 1 c,.?8-75
MASS EMISSION BY MODIFIED
FORU TTGAS 19b9
MNE.MODE FTP
b,* LITRE V8 GVK 19051 KG HUM r <( ,
rONCENTRAT ION CORRECTED ----CALCULATED GRAMS/MINU
MODE HC CO C02 MOX HC CO C02 N02
1 IDLE 223 1?13 ,2*
? lb HG 97 1B5B .97
i 10 HG Bb ?i )b i ,sn
* lb HG 85 1890 1.00
519 HG b£ 1*18 ,71
b lb HG 82 1792 .97
7 3 HG 508 115b2 1,93
8 lb HG 1*5 18bl 1 ,02
9 C.T, 1128 593 ,23
1 IDLE 2bB 12** ,2*
2 lb HG 122 2055 1,00
} 10 HG 98 223b 1,52
* lb HG 100 2022 1.00
S 19 HG 77 1**9 ,75
b lb HG 95 I95b 1,00
7 3 HG 533 11*39 1,93
8 lb HG 150 18bO 1,0*
i
19
*1
1 ' t
1
11
*3
19
5
19
bS
28
9 C.T, 1053 5b* .2* 1
1 IDLE 301 1275 .2* 1
2 lb HG 127 1989 1,00
3 10 HG 98 21b8 1.S5
* lb HG 107 1955 1.02
!. 19 HG 72 1H17 ,75
b lb HG 97 195b 1,00
7 3 HG 533 115b2 1.93
8 lb HG 157 2178 1.02
9 C.T. 1028 5b* ,23
1 IDLE 288 12** ,2*
2 lb HG 127 2090 .9?
3 10 HG lOb 230* 1,52
* lb HO 112 2023 ,97
5 19 HG 7* 1*81 .73
b lb HG 110 19Sb .97
7 3 HG SOB 11573 1.88
B lb HG 150 211* 1,00
20
*3
20
5
18
b3
25
1
t T T f
t 1 1 C
1
19
**
20
5
21
b3
2*
9 C.T, 1103 b21 .23 1
AVERAGE SIIM---CCOMPOSITE VALUES
AVERAGE SIJM---CCOMPOSITE VALUES
FOUR CYCLE COMPOSITE •
3,lb 3*. 7
1,38 53,2
1.21 bl.l
1,20 S*.l
,87 *0,b
l.lb 51,3
7,20 330,9
2,05 53.3
15,99 17,0
3,80 35, b
1,73 58,8
1,39 b*,0
1,*1 57,9
1,09 *1.S
1,3* 5b,0
7,55 327,*
2.12 53,2
1*,93 lb.1
*,2b 3b.5
1,80 5b,9
1,39 b2,0
1,52 55,9
1,01 *0,b
1.38 5b,0
7,55 330,9
2.23 bf, 3
1*.5S lb,2
*,P9 35, fa
1,80 59,8
1,50 b5,9
1,59 57,9
1,05 *2,*
1,55 5b,0
7.20 331.2
2,12 bO.S
15, b* 17,8
FOR CYCLES 1 AND 2)
FOR CYCLES 3 AND *)
HC- FID 0.35C
CO- NDIR 0.35C
C02-NDIR 0,35(
N02-CL 0.35C
FUEL 0.3SC
FUEL CONSUMED s
110,1
**0,*
b77,8
»*9, 9
328,8
**0.*
871,1
*59,5
101,7
110,1
*50,0
bBB,2
*50,0
337,9
**9,9
871,1
*b9,0
110,1
110.1
**9.9
b98.5
*S9,5
337.9
**9,9
871,1
*S9.S
101,7
110.1
**0,5
b88,2
**0,*
928,8
**0,*
8*9, i
*50,0
101,7
*
7b
397
Ib7
125
,05
.8b
1,85
,"1
,23
,80
2.91
1,20
.03
,0*
,8*
1,9*
,8b
.23
,8*
2,91
1,27
.03
.0*
,89
1,9*
• ^l
.23
.80
2,8*
1,11
,03
,03
.8*
1,97
,91
.23
,95
2,82
1,07
,03
,b) «• 0
,1) * 0
,5) * 0
,9) + 0
,7) + 0
,Blb
FUEL
55,10
lbb,70
2*5,39
Ib9.97
12*. 73
IbS.SS
**b,10
173. *3
Sb.SO
Sb.lB
172,87
250,25
172,07
128,2b
171.05
***,70
17b,51
57, b7
57,08
171.99
252,55
17*. 23
127,7*
171.09
**b,*5
178,11
5*,b7
Sb.*b
170. *3
251,33
Ib9.2b
125.79
IbB, 28
»39, 3*
17*. 10
Sb.SS
,b5( *
,b5t 77
.bSC 39b
,b5(
,b5( IbB
WT.
FACT,
,232
,077
,1*7
,077
,057
,077
.113
,077
,1*3
,232
,077
,1*7
,077
,057
,077
,113
,077
.1*3
,232
,077
,1*'
,077
,057
,077
,113
,077
,1*3
,232
,077
,1*'
,07?
.057
,077
,113
,077
,1*3
,8} * *
,9) = 77
,*) = 39b
, 9 ) =
,5) 3 ma
3 G/KG
---WEIGHTED GRAMS/MINUTE —
HC CO C02 N02 FUEL
.73
.11
.IB
,09
,OS
,09
.81
, lb
2,29
u C 1
* , S J.
,88
,13
,20
,11
.Ob
.10
.85
lib
2,1*
u u t
* , bb
,99
.1*
,20
.12
,0b
.11
.85
.17
2.08
U •} 3
* , 't
!i*
,22
,12
,0b
.12
.81
. lb
2,2*
U Q3
~ 0 O C
*,58
*,77
,70*
,2b2
,793
,922
,203
8,1
* , 1
9,0
*.2
2,3
*.o
37.*
* . 1
2.*
•j r c
f 3 | 3
8,3
* , 5
9,*
*,5
2,*
*,3
37,0
*, 1
2.3
7 b 7
sis
*,*
'« i
*,3
2,3
* , 3
37,*
*,8
2.3
T t U
f f • t
8,3
*,b
9, 7
*,5
2,*
*,3
37.*
*. '
2,5
T D tl
r U f T
?b,l
77,9
2b
3*
mo
35
19
3*
98
35
15
3 Q C
J ~ D
2K
35
101
35
19
35
98
3b
lb
u n n
T U U
2b
35
103
35
19
35
98
35
15
u n i
* u 1
2b
3*
101
3*
19
3*
9b
35
IS
397
39b
,01
.07
.27
,07
,01
,0b
.33
,09
,00
Q 2
, ^<
.01
,0b
.a*
,07
,01
,0b
, 31
.10
.00
Q 1
1 1 J
.01
,07
.29
,07
,01
,0b
,32
,09
.00
!oi
,0b
,i*
,07
,01
.07
.32
,08
,00
a 3
( ™ C
,11
.H
12, B
12,8
Jh, 1
13,1
',1
12.7
50,*
13.*
8,1
ILL C
1 b b . 3
13,0
U.3
3b.B
13,2
7,3
13,2
50, 3
13. b
8,2
i i. Q n
1 D ~ | U
13,2
13,2
37,1
13,*
7.3
U,2
50,*
13,7
7,8
i u a c
1 b M | 5
13.1
13,1
3b,9
13,0
7.2
13,0
*9,b
13,*
8,1
1 L T C
1 o f | b
Ib7,7
IbB, 5
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
MILLILITRES/MINUTE
-------
APPENDIX C-21
o
TABLE 15.
TRUCK 15 TEST ] b- 13-75
MODE
1 IDLE
2 lb HG
3 10 HG
* ib HG
5 19 HG
b lb HG
7 3 HG
8 lb HG
9 C,T,
1 IDLE
2 lb HG
3 10 HG
* Ifa HG
5 19 HG
b lb HG
7 3 HG
8 ib HG
* C,T,
1 IDLE
2 lb HG
3 10 HG
* ib HG
5 19 HG
fc lb HG
7 3 HG
8 lb HG
"< C.T,
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
* lb HG
5 19 HG
b Ifa HG
7 3 HG
B lb HG
<* C.T.
AVERAGE
MASS EMISSION BY MODIFIED
CMC D3GAS 197*
CONCENTRATION CORRECTED ----CALCULATED GRA
HC CO CO? MOX HC CO C02
102
1*3
221
1*3
79
13b
355
Ibl
8*2
127
lb*
2*2
15*
79
139
355
171
8b?
U*
1?*
239
15b
8*
l*b
330
171
8*1
112
Ibb
239
Ifal
82
1*1
330
171
8*1
SUM--
1013
2833
2b53
2blb
1091
2b52
12702
2912
b91
1073
301b
290*
279*
1091
2b50
12038
311b
b91
1013
3052
290*
2759
1121
279*
121b5
3117
b91
1013
2905
3088
29*2
1151
279b
13237
3117
b"l
.19 0
.97 22
1 ,bb IbO
1 .on ??
,7t; ]1
1,00 28
1,93 *o
1,00 20
, 15 0
rpiMpncT T f
\, \J m r \J O 1 " u
,19 0
1,00 23
l.bb Ib5
1,02 27
.77 11
1,0? 27
2,00 50
1,0* 23
,13 0
P n MO n Q T T t
^ U "" U O -I 't
,19 0
1.0? 25
l.bb IbO
1,00 29
, 77 11
1.0? 29
2,00 55
1,02 27
.11 0
r o MD n o T T c
L U "r U O 1 ' t
,17 0
1.00 2b
l.bb IbO
1,00 25
.75 11
i.on 2b
1,93 **
1.02 27
.11 0
fnijnrieTTr
-(COMPOSITE VALUES
/^•Aiinmnrvr 1 1 A l 1 1 C~ f-
AVERAGE oil"""" l LUTU;
FOUR CYCLE COMPOSITE
51IL V «UUC O
1.50 30,2
2,12 8*.b
3.28 79.?
2.12 78,1
1.1? 32, b
2.01 79.2
5,25 379,3
2,38 87,0
12, *5 20, b
1.87 32.0
2.*? 9Q.1
3.57 8b,7
2.27 83,5
1,17 32, b
2.05 79,2
5.25 35", 5
2,53 93, n
12,82 20, b
I.b9 30,2
2,57 91.?
3,5* Bb.7
2,31 82,*
1.25 33.5
2.1b 83.5
*.8B 3b3, 3
2,53 93,1
12, *5 20,b
l.bS 30,3
2,*b 8b.8
3,5* 92,2
2,38 87,9
1.21 3*.*
2.12 83,5
*,88 395,3
2.53 93,1
12, *5 20. b
FOR CYCLES 1 AND 2)
f no rvrit<5 "3 A KJ PI u ^
r (J K L- ' L L t Q j •• '
,*S 1 1 ,b
.lb b.O
. n7 1 . 9
.15 b.l
.59 *2,9
.18 b, 7
1,78 2,9
3Q T g i ^
« H J " 1 | f
.*3 7,*
,19 b,9
,53 12,7
,17 b,*
,07 1.9
,lb b.l
,59 *0.b
,20 7,2
1.83 3,0
M i -3 Q D 3
* i 1 r 4e,c
,39 7.0
,20 7,0
,52 12.7
,18 b.3
,07 1.9
.17 b.*
,55 *1,1
.20 7.2
1,78 3,0
LL n C Q 3 L
* f U b 4e»b
,38 7.0
.1^ b.7
.52 13. fa
,18 b,8
.07 2,0
,lb b,*
,55 **,7
.20 7.2
1,78 3.0
u n ^ Q T P
T,UJ Mr,C
*,05 ^1 ,9
HjO1^ ^Ht9
,0*5 GRA^SA
21
35
115
3b
20
3b
103
3b
10
U 1 "3
** 1 J
21
3b
115
37
21
37
107
38
9
u 3 n
•* c U
21
37
115
3b
21
37
107
37
8
41 Q
1 0
19
3b
115
3b
20
3b
J 03
37
8
u i n
* 10
*lb
^ 1 H
MINUTE
S/^INL
N02
.00
,08
l.i*
.10
,^3
,10
.22
.07
.00
1 T C
1 . ' 3
.00
.08
1,17
.10
.03
,10
.27
,08
.00
1 B C
1 , Bb
.00
.09
1.1*
,11
,03
,11
,30
,10
.00
1O Q
, O 8
.on
,10
1.1*
, 09
,03
.10
,2*
,10
,00
10 n
, e 0
1 . SO
1,8*
JTE
FUEL
10.3
l*,b
*2,b
l*.b
7,^
I1*.!'
5*. 3
1*,9
b.5
1-50 L
1 'H . 3
10. b
15.0
*3.2
15,0
7.5
l*.fi
5* ,*
IS.fe
b.l
ID? ^
1 B C | J
10,*
15.9
*3,2
I1*,?
7,5
15,0
5* , b
15,*
5.?
1 B 1 O
1 « 1 , H
9,7
1*.9
* 3,b
i*.q
?,*
1*,8
55,1
15,*
5,?
1O1 L.
1 H 1 , b
181,0
181,7
.880 GRAMS/MINUTE
,b38 GRAMS/MINUTE
,827 GRAMS/MINUTE
,*13 GRAMS/MINUTF
,b9? MILLILITRES/MINUTE
-------
APPENDIX C-21
n
8
TRUCK
MODE
1 IDLE
2 ib HG
t 10 HG
» ib HG
5 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
' C,T,
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
4 Ib HG
5 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
* C.T.
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
* ib HG
5 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
<* C.T,
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
* ib HG
5 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
a ib HG
* C.T,
AVERAGE
TABLE 16.
Ib TEST 1 fc,.ji».75
MASS fMissiOM BY MODIFIED
CHLV^OLET DSGAS i^bb
NlNt-v
b.O LI
CONCENTRATION CORRECTED ----CALCULATED GRAMS/MINIJ
HC CO C02 NOX HC CO C02 N02
32? 15b5 ,17
107 b79 ,89
292 30^7 1 , 3b
87 794 ,87
S5 714 ,41
82 880 ,89
582 13285 l.bO
11* 1115 .89
972 llbl .13
359 Ib29 .17
127 909 ,89
297 3438 l,3b
92 997 ,89
188 7*0 ,bl
94 9b7 ,89
582 135bb 1,57
11* 1115 ,89
-0
*9
138
*5
12
5]
*3
47
0
a T Tc
5 I 1 t
0
50
1*3
51
12
51
39
*5
9*7 llbl .15 0
_ ^ u ^ i c fnuoncTTL
3*9 1597 .15 0
129 qb7 .89
295 3*77 1.3b
10* 938 .89
173 711 ,bl
99 1085 .89
582 13428 1,57
122 12fa2 .89
50
1*3
53
1*
48
37
50
922 l]b) .15 0
3*4 Ib29 .15 0
127 99? ,89
292 328b 1,3*
9* 102b .89
Ib8 711 ,bl
99 997 .89
582 13291 1,57
119 U75 .89
50
1*8
*8
13
5b
37
50
922 llbl .15 0
fwpIC ^fMJBnGTYt
SUM — -(COMPOSITE VALUES
e i i u _ _/^*stinr^«TTF u A I iierc
AVERAGE ou^^^^vuuT'uoi < c v •* u u c. o
FOUR CYCLE COMPOSITE -
*,8b *7,6
l.bl 20,7
*, *? 94,5
1.31 24,2
1,28 21,8
1,2* 2h.8
8, 80 405,4
1,73 34.0
14,fa9 35,4
5,43 49,7
1,92 27,7
* , *9 10* , 9
1.39 30.4
2,8* 22, b
l.*3 29,5
8,80 *1*,0
1,73 3*,0
1*,31 35,4
5,28 48,7
1,95 29,5
*,*h lOb.l
1,58 28, b
2,b2 21,7
1,50 33,1
8,80 *09,8
1,8* 38,5
13,93 35,*
5,20 *9,7
1,92 30,4
*,*2 100,3
l.*3 31,3
2,5* 21.7
1,50 30,*
«,80 405, b
1,80 35,9
13,93 35,*
FOR CYCLES 1 AND
c" n D rvriFQ "3 & KJ n
rUn LTLLC.O 3 ••my
HC- FID 0,35
CO- NDIR 0,35
C02-NDIR 0,35
N02-CL 0,35
FUEL 0,35
FUEL CONSUMED
81.8
*29,2
b57, 7
*19.3
199.0
*2". 2
7b9.o
*29, 3
b*, 3
81,9
429,2
b57,7
429,3
292,7
429,3
757,9
429, 3
73.1
73,0
*29,3
b57. 7
*29.2
292.7
*29,3
757,9
*?9,3
73,0
73,0
*29,3
b*b,9
*29,3
292,7
*29,3
757,9
*?9,3
73,0
f 5
( 87
( 357
( 2
C Ifal
= 121
-.01
2 , 50
7,03
2 . P 7
, f,9
2,bO
2.21
2.38
.02
,00
2.55
7,29
2,bO
,b2
2,bO
1,98
2,30
.01
.00
2.55
7.29
2,b8
,b9
2,*5
1,88
2.55
.01
,00
2,53
7,5*
2,*5
«b?
2.83
1,91
2.55
,00
.5) + 0
.3) + 0
,b) + 0
,1) t 0
,b) + 0
.319
nof >• TP
THE V H G V n 1905
f-UEL
5*. 3h
1*7.32
258, 77
1 *5 . bO
71* , P7
14 9 , qp
452.41
154,04
52.53
55.9Q
151.10
2b* , 0 3
151,90
10b,40
151 ,50
*53.1b
15*. 0*
5*. 92
52,48
152,03
2b4,58
151, 2n
105,74
153. 3b
451.07
15b,39
5*. 5*
52.89
152,**
258, 2b
152,39
105, b?
152,02
*48 ,99
155,03
54,5*
,b5C 5
,bSC 88
,b5( 357
,b5( 2
,b5f Ib2
"ILLILITRE
WT.
FACT,
.232
.077
.1*7
,1177
."57
,077
.113
,077
,1*3
,232
.077
,1*7
,077
,057
,077
.113
,077
.1*3
,232
,077
.1*7
,077
,057
,077
,113
,077
,1*3
,23?
,077
.1*7
.077
,057
,077
,113
,077
,1*3
.5) =
• q) =
,85 =
,n =
. 5 ) =
S/MI^UT
1 KG H 1 | C
. 11,1
0 / « C,
---•sfclGHTtD GRAMS/MINUTt---
HC co c r i? N02 fun
1.13
,12
.b5
.10
.07
.10
,99
.1?
2,10
5u n
§ ~ u
l,2h
.15
,bb
,11
, 1 h
.11
.99
,13
2,05
BL p
. oc
1.22
,15
,bb
.12
.15
.12
.99
.1*
1,99
t: c u
b , S1*
1.2)
. Ib
,b5
.11
.1*
.12
,99
.1*
1,99
c. tn
j ( 3 U
5.51
t c p
S , TC
5,518
88, 3*8
3^7,7*1
2,117
1^.2.191
E
11.1
1 , b
13,9
1.9
1.2
2,1
45,8
2 . b
5,1
H t* P
O 3 j C
11.5
2, 1
15.4
2, 3
1.3
2.3
4b,8
2.b
5.1
Q Q C
n " * a
11.3
2,3
15, b
2.2
1.2
2,b
4b,3
3.0
5.1
g q c
O ~ f j
11.5
2.3
1*,7
2,*
1.2
2,3
*5,8
2.8
5.1
Q a 3
B 0 f 3
87,3
GRAMS/MI
19 ,00
33 .19
97 1.U3
32 .18
11 .03
33 ,20
87 ,25
33 .18
9 ,00
•a c. c p n u
3 ™ J c f U D
19 ,00
33 ,20
9? 1,07
33 ,rO
17 ,0*
33 ,20
8b ,22
33 ,18
10 ,00
a L i 3 in
3 D 1 C | 1 U
17 ,no
33 ,20
97 1,07
33 .21
17 ,0*
33 ,19
8b ,21
33 ,20
10 .00
•3 C Q J (I
3 3 ^ C f 1 J
17 .00
33 .19
95 1,11
33 ,19
17 ,0*
33 ,22
8b .22
33 ,20
10 ,00
•a c -5 j IL
3 b / c i 1 b
358 2,08
3 c Q 3 1 U
Jan c j 1 1
NUTE
J2.h
11.3
3H , 0
11 .<"
*.3
11.5
51,1
11.9
7.5
1 3 Jo
11, b
3H , P
11.7
b , 1
11,7
51.2
11.9
7.9
1 L 4 fi
1 b 3 t H
12.2
11,7
38,9
11, b
b.n
11,8
51,0
12,0
7.R
\ L a i
I b -3 i 1
12.3
11.7
38,0
11,7
b,0
11.7
50,7
11,9
7.8
1 L 1 Q
I b I | ^
i i j r
i b c f T
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MI
N.UTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
-------
APPENDIX C-21
O
TRUCK ]
MODE
1 IDLE
2 lb HG
3 10 HG
* ib HG
5 11 HG
b lb HG
7 3 HG
8 lb HG
* C,T.
1 IDLE
2 lb HG
3 10 HG
* lb HG
5 11 HG
b lb HG
7 3 HG
a ib HG
* C,T,
1 IDLE
2 ib HG
3 10 HG
* Ifa HG
5 11 HG
b lb HG
7 3 HG
8 lb HG
1 C.T,
1 IDLE
2 lb HG
3 10 HG
t lb HG
5 11 HG
b Ifa HG
7 3 HG
8 lb HG
1 C.T.
A \/ C D A r C
A V t K Bt» t
AVERAGE
TABLE 17.
.7 TEST 1 b-18-75
MASS EMISSION BY MODIFIED
IHC CAL DetiAS 1975
H I N E - M n n e FTP
5. ? LITRE Vfi GV
CONCENTRATION CORRECTED ----C ALCUL A T F D GHAMS/MIMIT
HC CO C02 NiOX HC CO C02 N02
15
2b
77
11
11
lb
8b
1*
1233
*3
*1
77
2b
18
21
81
H
1233
*5
* 1
77
21
18
2b
7b
11
1233
50
**
77
21
21
2*
7R
11
1183
C 1 1 U K B «.
*5
2b1
b*0
231
181
e**
2*b*
2*3
82
57
25b
b80
2*3
181
2*3
2bl1
25b
15
15
3'1
827
281
207
281
25*1
2*3
15
132
31b
85*
307
211
gl*
2b87
2bl
120
. f ^ r\ \*O ^ t
.11 1
,8b 17
1,3* 55
,«7 20
,^5 1?
,8b 20
2. OS 130
,81 22
.05 1
,11 1
.87 18
1,3* 57
,8i eg
,b7 12
,88 21
2.15 115
,10 23
.05 0
.11 1
.10 IB
1.3S 58
.81 2?
.bb 12
.81 21
2,15 110
,12 23
,0b 0
,20 1
,10 11
1.3b 5b
,10 22
.bl 13
,81 22
2,20 15
.12 2*
.Ob 0
COMPOSITE
3TTE UAi ItCO
3 LJ r*1 * " * 1 U LJ "' r U O A 1 L. ¥ •• fc *-f L. O
SUM. ..(COMPOSITE VALUES
FOUR CYCLE COMPOSITE •
.22 1.3 90. t
,38 7.9 * 0 1 . *
1.12 18,8 b23, 1
.27 b.B *Ob.O
. 1 b 5 . j 303,*
.2* 7.2 *01 .*
1.25 7g,S 151.0
,20 7,2 *15,2
17.17 g,» gg,»
.be 1,7 10.*
, bO 7.5 *0b, 0
1.12 20,0 b23,9
,38 7,2 *15,2
,27 5,3 312,1
,31 7,2 * 1 0 , b
1.18 77,1 117,5
,27 7,5 *11,8
17.17 2,8 22,*
,bb 2,8 10,*
,bO 10,1 *11,8
1.12 2*. 3 bei.l
,*2 8,3 *15,2
,27 b.l 307,8
,38 8.3 *15,2
1,10 75,0 117,5
,27 7,2 *21.0
17,17 2.8 21,1
,73 3,1 1*,3
.b* 11,7 *11,8
1,12 25,1 b3*,2
,*2 1,0 *11.8
,31 b,* 320,1
,35 8.7 *15,2
1.1* 79.1 1021,0
,27 7,1 *21,0
17.2* 3.5 21,1
HC- FID 0,35( 3,
CO- NDIR 0.3SC 1*.
C02-NDIR P , 3 "? t 3b1.
N02-CL 0 , 35 ( 1 ,
FUFL 0,3S( 12b.
FUEL CONSUMED = 17,
,05
. qo
c-,97
1,09
,bh
1 ,0b
7, Ob
1.17
.03
,0b
,1b
3.08
1,17
.bb
1.1?
b,?*
1.23
,02
,05
,9b
3.13
1.17
,b3
1.12
5.17
1,25
.0?
,0b
l , n l
3,05
1.20
,b8
1.17
5,15
1 ,28
,02
15 * 0 ,
b) + 0,
M + 0,
b ) + 0 ,
9) + 0.
Ob* M
FUEL
21,* I
130. 9b
207,31
131.'*
IS . 5 1
130.**
337. e5
13*. 75
2b.2S
29,19
132,**
207,89
13*. 9 j
101,39
U3,*l
35*, 11
13b,*b
2b,*3
30.58
138, *7
211. bb
135.52
100.38
135, HI
353,01
131.11
28,78
32, *2
138,88
213, bR
137,35
10* , 7*
135, b*
3b2.*b
131, Sb
28. *2
bS( 3.
b5( lb.
bS( 380,
b5( 1.
b5( 131 .
w ) 9 3 R
F ACT.
.232
.077
.1*7
.077
. 057
,077
,113
,077
.1*3
.232
.077
,1*7
,077
,057
,077
,113
,077
.1*3
.232
.077
.1*7
,077
.057
,077
,113
,077
.1*3
.232
,077
,1*7
,077
.057
.077
.113
,07 ?
,1*3
n =
7) =
0) = 3
5) =
3) = 1
/MINUTF
K (; H u <•
HC
.05
,03
. lb
,02
.01
,02
.1*
.02
2.57
3n y
t u c
.1*
.05
. lb
,03
,02
,02
.13
.02
2.57
31 t
• 15
.15
,05
. lb
.03
.02
,03
.12
,02
2.57
i 1 L
3 B A B
.17
,05
.lb
.03
.02
.03
.13
.02
e,*b
3.08
3 no
3 , ng
3.12
3.105
15.950
;b. 370
1.523
t = 1-*
, 1 G/KG
•. E I G H T E D G R A ^ •
co coe
.3
.b
2,8
.5
.3
, b
8,2
.b
.3
1 U 1
i * . 1
,*
,b
2,1
. b
,3
. b
8.7
.b
, 1*
t c n
1 3 f U
Is
3,b
,b
.3
.b
8,5
,b
,*
11 J
i b t i
,1
."
3.7
,7
.*
, 7
8.1
.b
,5
17,3
1 U (
1 T , b
lb«7
21
31
92
31
17
31
107
32
3
3 U L
y O n
21
31
12
32
18
32
113
32
3
^ T 11
3 7 *
21
3?
12
32
18
32
113
33
4
22
32
93
32
18
32
115
33
1
383
370
380
NO 2 FUFL
,01 b . 8
,07 10,1
,** 30,5
,08 10,1
.0* S.b
,08 10,0
,80 38,1
,01 10,*
,00 3,8
1 U 1 1 J C\ ti
It°^ 1 C 3 t ^
,01 7,0
.07 10,2
, * 5 3 0 , b
,09 10.*
,0* 5,8
,01 10.3
,71 10,0
,01 10,5
,00 3,8
t r i 1 3 D C
l,bb IcH.b
.01 7,1
,07 10.7
,*b 31.1
,09 10,*
,0* 5,7
, U 9 10,*
,b7 31,1
,10 10,7
,00 *,1
i r -3 1 3 n 3
1 ^ b J 1 a u , c
,01 7.5
,08 10,7
,*5 31,*
.09 1 0 , b
.0* b, 0
,01 10.*
.58 *1.0
.10 10,7
,00 *,1
1.** 132,*
1,51 12b,1
1,*1 131.3
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRA^S/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
s i . 7 b s GRAMS/MINUTE
-------
TRUCK 18 TEST
APPENDIX C-21
TABLE 18. "ASS EMISSION' BY MODIFIED MU't-MODfc FTP
7-11-75 FORD CAL, TTGAS 1975 b,4 LITRE V8
199SB KG HU" a 9,5 G/KG
O
o
ts;
MODE
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
4 ib HG
5 19 HG
b 1 b HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
9 C.T,
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
4 Ib HG
5 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
1 C.T.
1 IDLE
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
4 u HG
5 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
1 C.T.
1 IDLfc
2 Ib HG
3 10 HG
4 ib HG
5 19 HG
b Ib HG
7 3 HG
8 Ib HG
9 C.T,
AVERAGE
AVERAGE
CONCENTRATION CORRECTED ----CALCULATED GRAMS/MINU
HC CO C02 NOX HC CO C02 N02
8
13
70
13
S
8
57
8
1 211
41
33
80
23
15
18
be"
13
I23b
43
38
85
2B
22
23
b7
18
I28b
4b
4b
92
33
22
2b
b9
23
1311
2bl
207
785
195
1 HR
?i>0
314
?32
85
287
207
758
182
121
1 70
338
232
97
?87
257
798
18?
121
245
3b3
220
110
299
320
852
207
121
270
338
220
110
,2b 1
.97 14
1.47 Sb
,99 25
,7b 13
1,01 29
2,13 180
1,03 35
.11 1
rnMDOQTTC
U U^r U 3 1 1 t
.24 1
.97 15
1.49 59
.99 20
,7b 13
.99 17
2.1h 180
1.05 30
.11 1
.24 1
,99 15
1.49 SB
.99 20
,7b 18
1.03 34
2.18 185
1.01 22
.11 1
,2b 1
1.03 30
1.49 bO
.99 21
,7b 13
1.03 33
2.1b 190
1.01 24
.11 1
r"nunr^e T Tc
SUM — -(COMPOSITE VALUES
ShM.-.
(COMPOSITE VALUES
FOUR CYCLt COMPOSITE -
,13 7,9 123,b
.20 b,3 4b2,7
1,05 23,8 701.9
.20 5,9 472.7
.07 3,3 3b4,4
,1? b.7 482,7
.85 9,5 1020, b
.12 7,0 492,8
18, Ib 2,b S3, b
,bl 8,7 114,7
,50 b,3 4b?,7
1,80 23,0 712,8
,35 5,5 472,7
,22 3,7 3b4,4
.27 5,1 472,7
,92 10,2 1032, b
.20 7,0 502,9
18,54 2,9 S3,b
,bS B.7 114,7
,57 7,8 472,7
1,27 24,2 712,8
,42 5,5 472,7
,34 3,7 3b4,4
,35 7,4 49Z.8
1,00 11.0 1044.7
,Z7 b.7 482,7
19,29 3,3 53, b
,b9 9.1 123. fa
,b9 9,7 492,8
1,38 es,8 712.8
.50 b,3 472.7
,34 3,7 3b4,4
,39 8,2 492,8
1,04 10,2 1032, fa
,35 b.7 482,7
19, bb 3,3 53, b
HC- FID 0,35( 3
CO- NDIR 0,35( 9
C02-NDIR 0,35( 423
N02-CL 0,35( 1
FUEL 0,35( 141
FUEL CONSUMED = lOfa
,03
,b7
2.bb
1.17
,bO
1.37
8,58
I.b5
.03
.03
.70
2,80
,9b
,b2
,82
8,58
1 . *1
.03
.0*
.72
2.78
,94
,84
l.bO
8,82
I.Ob
.03
,04
1,41
2,85
,98
,b2
1,58
9, Ob
1.13
.03
,1) + 0
,0) + 0
,2) * 0
,8) + 0
.0) + 0
,450
FUEL
43.05
149.29
234,31
152, 2b
Ilb.b7
155, 73
327,58
159,10
3b,34
41.12
149,59
837,48
152,22
117,01
151. 9b
331,82
Ib2,37
3b,91
41, Ib
153,58
238, Ib
158,30
117,12
159,51
33b,07
155.88
37.85
44,19
Ifa0.99
339,08
152,75
117,1?
159,93
331,93
155, 9b
38,23
,bS( 3
,b5( 9
,b5( 42b
,bS( 1
,fa5( 143
WT,
FACT.
.232
,077
,1*7
,077
,057
.077
.113
,077
,143
.232
,077
,147
,077
,057
,077
.113
.077
.143
.832
,077
.1*7
.077
.057
,077
,113
,077
.1H3
.232
,077
.1*7
.077
,057
,077
,113
,077
.1*3
,4) a 3
,9)a 9
.9) s 4?5
,8) B l
,0) = Iu2
---WEIGHTED GRAWS/"INUTE---
HC CO C02 N02 FUEL
.03
.Of
.15
.02
,00
.01
.10
,01
2,bO
?q •a
• •*
!o4
.18
,03
.01
.02
.10
.02
31 q
• »
.15
.04
. 11
,03
,02
.03
.11
,02
2.7b
3u t:
• 3 3
',06
.20
.04
,02
,03
. 12
,03
2.81
3li J
i t b
3, Ob
3,41
.285
,553
,b!9
,811
.313
1,8 29
,5 3b
1,5 103
,5 3b
.2 51
.5 37
1,1 115
,5 38
,4 8
Bq u a •»
| ~ f E J
2.0 27
.5 3b
3,4 105
,4 3b
.2 21
,4 3b
1,2 117
.5 39
,4 a
q n u a u
~ I U T C T
2,0 27
,b 3b
3,b 105
.4 3b
.2 21
,b 3B
1,2 118
,5 37
.5 B
Q U U 3 U
T i b H e b
2,1 29
.7 38
3,8 105
,5 3b
,2 ?1
,b SB
1,2 117
.5 37
.5 B
in l ti 3 o
10,1 4 c Q
9,0 423
9,9 427
GRAMS/MINUTfc
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAMS/MINUTE
GRAHS/MINUTE
.01
,05
,39
i nq
, n 9
,11
,97
,13
.00
i •) g
1 § r B
.01
,05
,41
.07
.04
,0b
,97
,11
,00
1 7 -a
i , / J
.01
,0b
,41
,07
.05
.12
1,00
,08
,00
;o n
, HU
,01
,11
,*2
,08
,04
,12
1,02
.09
,00
ID a
i o 8
1.75
1,84
in.o
11,5
34 ,4
11,7
b,7
1?,D
37,0
12.3
i u n R
i. ~ U | O
1U5
34,9
11.7
b.7
11.7
37,5
12,5
5.3
mi
. '
n!e
35,0
11,7
b.7
12,3
38,0
12,0
5,4
mf
t •>
10,3
12,4
35,1
11,8
b,7
12,3
37.5
12,0
5.6
111*9 C
143,5
141,0
143,0
MILLILITRES/MINUTE
-------
APPENDIX D
DIESEL TRUCK RESULTS
D-l through D-12 Summarized Results of
12 Diesel Trucks
-------
APPENDIX D-l
TABLF 19-1. TRUCK 019 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
1972 Ford D2DIE 9.39 Litre V-8 GVW 9979 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
15. 05
10.96
10. 13
7. 63
4. 29
3.92
3.41
6. 24
4. 29
4.58
10. 24
7.81
5.69
4.90
CO
16.2
10.9
10.8
8.3
5.0
4.4
2.5
6.4
4. 2
5.4
15.0
10.5
7. 1
6.0
co2
1360
936
879
683
501
653
660
847
553
685
1190
905
750
784
5216 KG
NOX
15. 08
8.79
7.39
5.64
4.52
5.48
6. 57
7.68
5.61
6.69
10. 25
8. 02
6. 63
7.02
HALF LOAD -
Fuel*
53. 3
36. 7
34. 5
26. 8
19.4
25. 0
25. 1
32.6
21.3
26.3
46.3
35. 2
29.0
30. 1
HC
17. 26
11. 57
10.91
8.32
4.59
4.02
3.68
6.85
4. 10
5.09
11.77
9. 18
6.26
5.38
CO
19. 0
12.4
8. 2
8.4
5. 1
4.6
2.5
7.4
3.8
5.7
12.3
9.9
7.5
8.5
C02
1531
925 .
922
719
514
676
714
1029
625
721
1224
1023
883
990
7258 KG
NOX
15.38
8.96
8. 25
6.42
5. 00
6.56
7.94
7.73
5.84
6.80
10.77
9. 10
8. 06
9.03
FULL LOAD - 9072 KG
Fuel*
60. 1
36.5
36. 0
28. 2
20. 0
25.9
27. 1
39.5
24.0
27.7
47.6
39. 7
34. 0
37.9
HC
17. 74
12.47
11.38
8.33
4. 64
4. 15
3.81
5.77
4. 08
4. 91
10.89
7.46
5.65
4.39
CO
18. 1
12.9
11.3
8.3
4.8
4.5
2.5
6.4
4.9
5. 1
15.4
9.9
7.3
8.8
C02
1439
937
910
721
533
714
770
1195
740
800
1378
1059
925
971
NOX
15.49
9.76
8.64
6. 85
5.91
7.55
9.71
10.40
7. 26
6.98
13.45
10. 11
9.37
9.96
Fuel*
56.6
37. 1
35. 8
28. 3
20. 6
27.3
29.2
45. 5
28. 3
30. 6
53.4
40. 8
35. 5
37. 2
#Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
APPENDIX D-l (Cont'd.)
TABLE 19-2. TRUCK 019 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1972 Ford D2DIE 9. 39 Litre V-8 GVW 9979 KG Project 11-4 133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
r 30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
13-FTP
13-FTP
FMPTY IOAD -
HC
0. 66
2. 06
3. 00
4. 16
4. 17
3. 55
4. 29
5. 11
3. 54
3. 57
5. 12
1.59
2. 08
2. 27
2. 57
CO
0.8
2. 2
3.0
4.4
4.5
4. 2
4.9
3.7
3.6
3. 5
6.0
2.3
2.8
2.8
3.2
CO?
60
186
256
361
374
415
715
988
480
460
765
184
241
299
412
5216 KG
NOX
0.91
2.06
2.40
3.03
3.09
3.75
6.00
9.83
4. 35
4. 67
7.46
1.59
2. 13
2.64
3.69
Fuel*
19. 78
61.41
84.66
119. 36
123.44
135.72
230.58
316.42
155.68
149.48
247. 84
60. 50
78.86
97.20
133. 14
HALF LOAD -
HC
0. 60
2. 36
3. 16
4. 48
4. 55
3.81
4.40
5. 50
3.65
3.30
5. 51
1.90
2. 50
2. 58
2.83
3.48
3.46
CO
0.9
2. 6
3. 4
3.4
4.6
4.2
5. 0
3.7
3.9
3.0
6. 2
2.0
2. 7
3. 1
4. 5
6.38
6.32
CO?
59
209
253
378
393
426
739
1068
549
503
781
197
278
364
521
729
742
7258 KG
NOX
0. 80
2. 10
2.45
3.39
3.51
4. 15
7. 18
11. 88
4. 12
4.69
7.36
1.74
2.48
3.32
4.75
6.22
6. 11
Fuel*
19. 55
69. 23
84. 08
124. 57
130. 05
139.38
238. 50
342.06
177.48
162. 35
253. 29
64. 68
91. 08
118. 01
168.40
224. 10
223.30
FULL LOAD - 9072 KG
HC
0. 61
2.43
3.41
4. 67
4. 56
3.85
4.55
5.71
2.96
3. 22
5. 22
1.63
1.97
2. 22
2.31
CO
0.8
2. 5
3. 5
4. 6
4. 5
4. 0
4.9
3. 7
3.3
3.9
5.4
2. 3
2.6
2.9
4.6
CO2
56
197
256
374
395
441
781
1153
614
584
851
206
280
363
512
NOX
0. 78
2. 12
2. 67
3. 55
3. 75
4.89
8.26
14. 53
5.34
5. 73
7.43
2. 01
2.67
3.58
5. 25
Fuel*
18.42
65. 30
85.43
123.95
130.38
144. 04
251. 61
368.81
196. 84
188. 01
274. 68
67.40
90.91
117. 37
164.94
*Fuel Consumption in Grams/Minute
13-FTP - 13-Mode Federal Test Procedure
-------
APPENDIX D-l (Cont'd.)
TABLE 19-3. TRUCK 019 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1972 Ford D2DIE 9. 39 Litre V-8 GVW 9979 KG Project 11-4 133
Tr-St
D(> St.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD - 5216 KG
HC
33. 23
33. 52
35. 41
34. 82
33.81
26. 18
18. 58
16. 15
22.73
23.89
20.65
26. 23
26.34
23.31
19.31
CO
40. 2
36. 0
35. 3
37. 2
36.8
30. 7
21. 1
11. 8
23.3
23.2
24. 1
38.5
35.5
29.2
23.8
co2
3023
3029
3024
3023
3026
3060
3099
3121
3082
3079
3088
3048
3052
3071
3092
NOX
45.99
33. 59
28. 39
25.41
25. 01
27. 60
26.01
31. 06
27.97
31.22
30. 11
26.26
27.04
27. 15
27. 69
HALF LOAD
HC
30.92
34. 10
37. 64
35.93
35.00
27.31
18.45
16. 09
20.57
20.33
21.77
29.34
27.43
21.83
16. 82
CO
43.9
37. 5
40. 3
26.9
35. 3
30. 1
21. 1
10.9
22. 2
18. 7
24.3
30.6
29.7
26.3
26.7
- 7258 KG
C02
3024
3024
3009
3035
3025
3057
3099
3 123
3091
3097
3084
3050
3057
3080
3095
NOX
40.88
30.38
29. 14
27. 18
27. 02
29. 75
30. 08
34.73
23. 22
28.92
29. 08
26.85
27. 19
28. 13
28. 23
FULL LOAD
HC
33. 15
3.7. 15
39.92
37.66
34.96
26. 69
18.07
15.48
15.05
17. 14
19.02
24. 18
21.68
18. 88
14. 02
CO
45.7
37. 8
41.4
37.4
34. 6
27. 5
19.6
10. 1
16.7
20. 5
19.6
34. 2
28.9
24.3
28.0
- 9072 KG
coz
3015
3014
3000
3013
3026
3063
3103
3126
3117
3104
3100
3061
3077
3093
3102
NQx
42. 19
32.44
31. 26
28. 60
28. 76
33.98
32. 82
39.40
27. 10
30.48
27.05
29.87
29.38
31.32
31.81
-------
G
TABLE 19-4.
1972 Ford D2DIE
APPENDIX D-l (Cont'd.)
TRUCK 019 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
9.39 Litre V-8 GVW 9979 KG Project 11-4133
EMPTY LOAD-5216 KG
HALF LOAD - 7258 KG
FULL LOAD - 9072 KG
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
Rack,
RPM
680
1730
1920
2300
2250
2060
2725
2625
%
0.
33.
35.
39.
39.
41.
70.
71.
0
9
7
4
4
3
8
5
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Period
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
81
82
86
91
92
93
94
13.
24.
38.
0
0
0
51
52
56
61
62
63
64
Rack,
RPM
680
1750
1915
2330
2276
2063
2739
2640
.%
0.
33.
35.
40.
40.
41.
72.
72.
0
3
1
1
1
3
0
7
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Period
13.
24.
38.
0
0
0
21
22
26
31
32
33
34
RPM
680
1722
1925
2315
2240
2065
2741
2645
Rack
%
0. 0
33. 3
35. 1
38.9
39.4
41.8
73.3
75. 1
Period
13.
24.
38.
0
0
0
-------
APPENDIX D-2
TABLE ZO-1. TRUCK 020 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
1975 Ford Cal. TTDIE 14. 01 Litre 1-6 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Drsc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
5.53
2.97
2.47
1. 77
1. 25
0.87
0. 69
1.46
1. 27
0.69
3.98
2.50
2.01
1. 50
CO
9. 7
5. 3
4. 5
3.6
2.9
2.3
2. 1
4.7
3. 0
2. 0
7. 7
6. 1
5.8
3.9
C02
2620
1557
1357
1074
973
1026
1187
1155
970
946
2006
1616
1407
1292
11113 KG
NOX
15.95
9.47
7.69
6.84
7.37
9.91
16.58
9.71
8.25
8.57
16. 15
13.03
11.69
12.21
Fuel*
98. 6
58. 6
51. 0
40.4
36.5
38.4
44.4
43.4
36.4
35.4
75.5
60.8
52.9
48.5
HALF LOAD - 22226 KG
HC
4. 74
2.58
1.95
1.29
0.99
0.67
0.64
2.09
1.45
0.63
4.07
2.65
2.35
1.40
CO
7.8
3.8
3.8
3.0
2.0
1.5
1.8
4. 1
2. 2
1. 5
9.5
7. 8
8.3
5. 2
C02
2620
1646
1442
1125
1157
1135
1499
1569
1068
1083
2287
1975
1785
1671
NOX
13. 69
8.62
7.45
6.37
7.98
10.88
25. 64
15.47
10.08
10.75
23.71
20.68
19. 02
20.33
Fuel*
98.5
61.8
54. 1
42. 2
43. 2
42.4
55.9
58.8
40.0
40.5
86. 1
74. 2
67.2
62.6
FULL LOAD - 33340 KG
HC
4. 53
2. 51
1.91
1.36
1. 04
0.73
0.86
2. 44
1. 94
0. 69
3.89
2.42
2. 19
1. 52
CO
6.7
4. 2
2. 5
3.0
2. 3
1.7
3. 1
11.3
4.3
2. 5
12.5
9.5
11. 8
6.7
C02
2591
1628
1440
1143
1292
1336
1742
1861
1352
1304
2694
2331
2236
1987
NOX
15. 82
9.97
8.43
7.28
10. 36
14.52
33. 02
22. 24
17. 87
15. 29
26. 17
25. 54
25.04
25.39
Fuel*
97. 3
61. 1
53.9
42.9
48. 3
49.9
65. 1
70. 2
50. 8
48.7
101.4
87. 5
84. 1
74. 5
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
TABLE 20-2.
1975 Ford Cal. TTDIE
APPENDIX D-2 (Cont'd. )
TRUCK 020 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
14.01 Litre 1-6 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
13-FTP
13-FTP
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
0. 30
0.80
0.79
0. 99
0.95
1. 03
0.94
1.01
0.80
1. 04
0. 75
0. 59
0.73
0. 86
0. 81
CO
0.5
1.4
1.4
1.8
1.9
2.4
2.4
3.2
2.6
2.4
2.2
1. 1
1.8
2. 5
2. 1
C02
107
379
413
546
579
799
1106
1748
631
791
1031
295
470
601
698
11113 KG
NOX
0.82
2.31
2. 51
3. 09
3.69
6.05
10.68
24.41
5.30
6.73
9. 34
2.38
3.79
4.99
6.60
Fuel*
34.03
120.40
131.03
173. 04
183.37
252. 58
348.86
550.38
199.86
250. 16
324.98
93.76
148. 97
190. 50
220.77
HALF LOAD - 22226 KG
HC
0. 27
0. 69
0. 73
0.78
0. 69
0.81
0. 72
0.93
1. 16
1. 17
0. 67
0.61
0.76
0.95
0.76
0.96
0. 85
CO
0.3
1. 1
1. 1
1.5
1. 6
1.6
1.6
2.6
2.3
1.8
1.6
1.4
2. 2
3.4
2.8
5.5
4.6
co2
92
379
464
580
606
949
1215
2171
874
867
1150
344
563
720
898
1391
1361
NOX
0. 61
1. 98
2.43
3. 00
3.44
6.55
11. 65
37. 12
8. 61
8. 18
11.40
3. 57
5. 90
7.67
10.93
23.85
24.90
Fuel*
29. 37
120. 16
146. 56
183.33
191. 52
299. 12
382. 26
682. 70
276. 12
273.82
361. 83
109. 22
178. 40
228. 21
283.73
432. 76
432. 76
FULL LOAD - 33340 KG
HC
0.26
0.66
0.71
0.77
0.73
0.86
0.79
1. 25
1.33
1.58
0.76
0.56
0.66
0.85
0.79
CO
0. 3
1.0
1. 2
1.0
1.6
1.9
1.8
4.6
6.2
3.5
2.8
1.8
2.6
4.6
3.5
C02
89
375
458
579
616
1060
1451
2537
1015
1103
1435
388
637
871
1033
NOX
0.69
2. 29
2.81
3.39
3.92
8.50
15.77
48.08
12. 13
14. 57
16.83
3.77
6.98
9.75
13. 20
Fuel*
28. 15
118. 73
144.99
182. 79
194. 71
334. 20
456.45
798. 64
322.37
349. 02
452. 02
123. 16
201.74
276.02
326. 20
*Fuel Consumption in Grams/Minute
13-FTP - 13-Mode Federal Test Procedure
-------
o
APPENDIX D-Z (Cont'd.)
TABLE 20-3. TRUCK 020 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1975 Ford Cal. TTDIE 14. 01 Litre 1-6 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD - 11113 KG
HC
8.72
6.65
6.03
5.74
5. 19
4.08
2.69
1.84
4.00
4. 15
2.30
6.25
4.88
4.50
3.67
CO
16. 1
11. 7
10. 7
10.5
10. 6
9. 5
7.0
5.7
12.8
9.7
6.7
12. 2
11.9
13. 1
9.5
CO2
3137
3151
3154
3156
3157
3162
3171
3175
3157
3162
3172
3151
3156
3155
3164
NOX
24. 08
19. 18
19. 18
17.87
20. 11
23.94
30. 62
44.36
26.54
26.89
28. 74
25.37
25.44
26.21
29.90
HALF LOAD
HC
9. 10
5.71
4.96
4.28
3.63
2.72
1.88
1.36
4. 21
4.29
1.86
5.62
4.23
4. 15
2.66
CO
10.5
9.4
7.2
8.4
8.5
5.4
4.3
3. 8
8.3
6.4
4.5
13. 1
12.5
14.7
9.9
- 22226
co2
3145
3157
3163
3163
3165
3173
3177
3180
3164
3167
3177
3152
3157
3154
3166
KG
NOX
20.73
16.49
16.56
16.34
17.94
21.89
30.47
54.38
31. 20
29.88
31.52
32. 69
33.06
33. 60
38.52
FULL LOAD - 33340
HC
9. 24
5. 52
4.88
4. 20
3. 77
2.56
1.74
1.56
4. 13
4.54
1. 68
4.55
3. 28
3. 10
2.41
CO
9. 1
8. 2
8.3
5. 5
8.4
5.7
4.0
5.7
19. 1
10. 1
6. 1
14.7
12.9
16.6
10.7
C02
3147
3160
3162
3168
3165
3173
3178
3176
3147
3160
3175
3153
3159
3154
3166
KG
NOX
24.45
19.29
19.36
18.54
20. 15
25.43
34.56
60.20
37. 62
41.75
37.24
30.63
34.61
35.32
40.45
-------
TABLE 20-4.
1975 Ford Cal. TTDIE
APPENDIX D-2 (Cont'd.)
TRUCK 020 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
14. 01 Litre 1-6 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4133
EMPTY LOAD - 111 13 KG
HALF LOAD - 22226 KG
FULL LOAD-33340 KG
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
81
82
86
91
92
93
94
Rail,
RPM p
670
1577
1550
1750
1670
1919
1850
1908
Period
27.0
44. 0
60. 0
>si
0
9
8
13
13
24
30
60
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
51
52
56
61
62
63
64
Rail,
RPM f
650
1550
1625
1750
1700
1900
1850
1880
Period
27. 0
44. 0
60. 0
>si
0
7
10
12
14
24
36
78
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
21
22
26
' 3 1
32
33
34
Rail,
RPM
670
1500
1600
1750
1700
1950
1850
1885
Period
27. 0
44. 0
60. 0
psi
0
6
10
12
14
30
42
97
-------
APPENDIX D-3
TABLE 21-1. TRUCK 021 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
1973 IHC TTDIE 14. 01 Litre 1-6 GVW 34474 KG Project 11-4 133
T.-st
Dose.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
2. 78
2. 14
1. 03
0. 87
0. 72
0. 55
0. 37
1. 33
0. 57
0. 53
3.65
2. 27
1. 81
1. 26
CO
19.6
14. 9
7.6
7.0
5.6
4.6
5. 0
6. 0
3. 3
3.4
20. 1
15.9
15. 0
11.9
C02
2712
2511
1407
1344
1281
1194
1109
1509
1093
1229
2136
1749
1592
1455
11113 KG
NOX
21. 37
18. 97
11. 10
11. 08
11.49
12. 58
17. 59
15. 33
12. 40
14. 62
21. 75
18. 37
17. 51
17. 67
Fuel*
102. 3
94. 5
52.9
50. 5
48. 0
44. 8
41. 6
56. 6
40.9
46. 0
81. 1
66.2
60.3
55. 0
HALF LOAD - 22226 KG
HC
3. 16
2.33
1.06
0. 93
0.73
0.61
0.37
2.32
1.08
0.53
3. 54
2.35
1.80
1. 17
CO
14. 6
12.6
5.8
5. 1
4.4
4.0
10.3
10.3
7.2
4.4
25.6
22.8
20. 2
17. 5
C02
2879
2828
1486
1423
1384
1303
1437
1706
1200
1341
2402
2192
1898
1808
NOX
22.83
22.62
12.48
10.71
13.97
15.96
29. 10
20. 25
16.66
18.04
26.48
26.41
23. 23
25. 02
Fuel*
108.
106.
55.
53.
51.
48.
54.
64.
45.
50.
91.
83.
72.
68.
3
2
7
3
8
8
1
3
2
2
3
1
0
4
FULL LOAD - 33340 KG
HC
2. 72
1. 94
0. 73
0. 69
0.52
0.39
0. 27
2.74
1. 14
0.54
4.40
2.66
1.97
1.39
CO
15.3
14. 8
6.4
5.7
5. 3
4. 6
13. 2
21.6
15.4
5.3
30.3
27.0
24. 1
20. 2
C02
2514
2682
1422
1406
1392
1424
1648
2068
1505
1517
3134
2642
2328
2269
NOX
20. 15
19. 77
11. 06
11. 90
13. 50
17. 65
36. 55
28. 90
23. 81
19. 76
36.78
32. 59
38. 86
34. 00
Furl"
94. 7
100. 8
53. •>,
52. 7
52. 1
53. -',
62. J
78. ^
57. h
56. c
118. fc
100. J
88. 2
85. '
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
d
APPENDIX D-3 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 21-2. TRUCK 021 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1973 IHC TTDIE 14. 01 Litre 1-6 GVW 34474 KG Project 1 1-4 133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
13-FTP
13-FTP
13-FTP
EMPTY
HC
0.30
0. 38
0. 57
0.42
0.47
0. 58
0. 59
0. 55
0. 73
0.47
0. 58
0. 54
0. 64
0. 74
0. 66
CO
0.9
2. 7
4.0
3. 1
3.8
4.5
5. 0
7.3
3.3
2.7
3.7
3.0
4.5
6. 1
6.2
LOAD -
co2
99
371
667
566
724
1030
1278
1632
826
891
1328
313
495
648
762
1 11 13
NOX
0. 85
2.92
5.04
4.46
5.97
9. 24
13.46
25.90
8. 39
10. 11
15.80
3. 19
5. 20
7. 12
9.25
KG
Fuel*
31.94
117.96
211. 44
179. 39
229.42
325.79
403. 64
515.84
261. 23
281. 13
418.77
100. 10
157.91
206.79
242. 50
HALF LOAD - 22226 KG
HC
0. 30
0.43
0. 62
0. 43
0. 50
0. 59
0. 65
0. 55
1. 21
0. 85
0. 55
0. 50
0. 63
0.70
0. 60
0. 47
0. 44
0. 50
CO
0. 8
2. 0
3. 3
2.3
2.8
3.5
4.3
15. 2
5.4
5.7
4.6
3.6
6.2
7.9
9.0
6. 8
7. 1
7.5
C02
108
394
751
598
767
1113
1394
2116
893
951
1411
342
591
741
930
1220
1228
1180
NOX
0.91
3. 12
6. 01
5.02
5.78
11.24
17.08
42.85
10. 60
13. 20
18.98
3. 77
7. 12
9. 07
12. 86
20. 24
20.38
21.00
Fuel*
34. 55
124. 83
237. 60
188.96
242. 28
351. 31
439. 75
671. 31
283. 87
301. 74
444. 99
109. 59
189. 03
236. 94
296.43
377. 12
377. 12
379. 53
FULL LOAD - 33340 KG
HC
0. 29
0.37
0. 52
0. 29
0.37
0.42
0.42
0.40
1.30
0.84
0.55
0. 60
0.72
0. 77
0.70
CO
0.8
2. 1
3.9
2. 6
3. 1
4.3
4.9
19.4
10. 2
11.3
5.3
4. 1
7. 3
9.4
10.2
C02
101
344
712
572
758
1120
1524
2426
980
1107
1522
428
711
906
1149
NOX
0. 83
2. 76
5. 25
4.45
6.41
10. 86
18. 88
53. 81
13. 69
17. 52
19. 82
5. 03
8.77
15. 12
17. 21
Fuel*
32. 20
109. 19
255. 64
180. 81
239.46
353.47
480.44
770.46
313.48
353. 53
480. 35
136.92
227. 12
289.38
365.79
*Fuel Consumption in Grams /Minute
13-FTP - 13-Mode Federal Test Procedure
-------
d
APPENDIX D-3 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 21-3. TRUCK 021 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1973 IHC TTDIE 14. 01 Litre 1-6 GVW 34474 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Dose.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD - 11113 KG
HC
9.31
3.22
2.69
2.32
2. 05
1.78
1.45
1.06
2. 78
1. 65
1.38
5.35
4.07
3. 57
2.72
CO
29.0
22. 7
18. 7
17. 1
16. 4
13.9
12. 3
14. 2
12. 6
9.6
8.9
29.5
28. 5
29.5
25.6
co2
3115
3 144
3152
3156
3158
3163
3166
3164
3162
3170
3172
3127
3133
3133
3141
NOX
26. 50
24. 78
23. 82
24. 88
26. 03
28.36
33. 35
50. 20
32. 11
35. 96
37. 73
31.83
32.91
34.45
38. 16
HALF LOAD
HC
8. 59
3.46
2.61
2. 25
2.07
1.67
1.49
0.82
4. 27
2.83
1.25
4.61
3.36
2.96
2. 03
CO
24. 4
16. 0
14. 1
12.4
11.4
10. 1
9.7
22.6
19. 0
18.9
10.4
33.3
32.6
33. 3
30.4
- 22226
C02
3125
3154
3160
3164
3166
3169
3170
3152
3147
3151
3170
3123
3128
3128
3136
KG
NOX
26.41
25. 01
25. 28
26. 57
23.84
31.98
38.84
63. 83
37.36
43.74
42. 64
34.43
37.69
38.28
43.40
FULL LOAD
HC
9. 07
3. 41
2. 29
1. 63
1. 55
1. 19
0.88
0.51
4. 15
2.38
1. 14
4.40
3. 15
2. 64
1.92
CO
25. 1
19.2
17.4
14.3
12.8
12.0
10.2
25.2
32.6
32.0
11. 1
30.2
32.0
32.4
28.0
- 33340 KG
C02
3122
3149
3156
3163
3165
3167
3171
3149
3126
3132
3169
3129
3130
3131
3140
NOX
25. 76
25. 24
23. 26
24. 60
26.78
30.72
39.30
69.84
43. 67
49. 55
41. 27
36.72
38.62
52.25
47. 04
-------
APPENDIX D-3 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 21-4. TRUCK 021 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
1973 IHC TTDIE 14.01 Litre 1-6 GVW 34474 KG Project 11-4133
EMPTY LOAD - 1 1 113 KG
HALF LOAD - 22226 KG
FULL LOAD- 33340 KG
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
RPM
670
1462
1880
1600
1786
1950
I960
1710
Rail,
psi
0.0
7. 0
14. 0
12.0
17.0
27.0
38.0
64. 0
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Period
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
81
82
86
91
92
93
94
34.
51.
96.
0
0
0
51
52
56
61
62
63
64
Rail,
RPM
666
1400
1916
1638
1800
1968
1938
1725
psi
0.
7.
16.
12.
18.
32.
46.
94.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Period
34.
51.
96.
0
0
0
21
22
26
31
32
33
34
Rail,
RPM
670
1420
1911
1600
1802
1944
1970
1730
psi
0.
7.
16.
12.
18.
32.
54.
122.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Period
34.
51.
96.
0
0
0
-------
TABLE 22- 1.
1971 Mack TTDIE
APPENDIX D-4
TRUCK 022 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
11.01 Litre 1-6 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4133
Tr-St
Dfsc:.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
d 20±5
30±5
*" 40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
7. 27
13.44
6.58
7.47
3. 25
2. 42
1.67
6. 20
3.80
2. 20
10.27
5.81
4.39
3.41
CO
17. 7
16. 6
8.9
7.9
3.3
1. 8
16. 0
9.4
4. 4
1.4
37. 1
29.4
23.6
19. 1
CO2
914
1875
1046
1217
723
781
1123
1263
852
723
1841
1398
1286
1288
11113 KG
NOX
21.97
20. 75
16. 71
13. 26
10. 28
17. 27
16. 70
13. 20
12. 23
15. 87
27.57
19. 83
19.09
19.45
Fuel*
35.
72.
40.
46.
27.
29.
42.
48.
32.
27.
71.
54.
49.
49.
9
3
2
6
5
4
9
3
4
2
8
4
7
4
HALF LOAD - 22226 KG
HC
5.
12.
6.
7.
3.
2.
0.
5.
3.
2.
9.
5.
3.
2.
88
67
47
42
26
51
94
07
73
33
02
23
71
60
CO
10. 1
11.9
5.9
5.7
2.4
4. 1
11.7
17. 7
11.3
6.8
50.2
39.6
32.7
26.4
C02
843
1787
1047
1291
794
951
1493
1491
1040
967
2015
1727
1515
1560
NOx
20. 09
21.06
17. 11
13.34
11.35
21.07
26. 04
16. 18
15. 53
23. 13
31. 23
26.58
22.86
24. 3Z
Fuel*
32.
68.
40.
49.
30.
35.
56.
57.
39.
36.
78.
67.
58.
59.
6
6
0
2
0
9
3
1
8
6
9
2
7
9
FULL LOAD - 33340 KG
HC
6.08
12. 40
6.43
7.59
3. 29
2.38
0.59
4.73
2. 12
1.69
9.03
4.97
3.49
2.53
CO
12.4
12.8
5.8
6. 2
2. 6
10.7
15. 1
23. 7
13.9
12. 2
65.8
46.7
39.8
36.2
C°2
837
1759
1057
1310
843
1124
1540
1966
1205
1087
2774
2221
2006
1907
NOX
18. 97
20.99
16. 62
13. 29
11. 68
25. 83
28. 71
22. 39
17. 91
26. 30
42. 12
31.43
29. 16
29. 03
Fuel*
32.6
67. 6
40. 4
50. 0
31.9
42. 7
58. 2
75. 1
45. 9
41. 3
108. 1
85.9
77.4
73. 3
#Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
d
APPENDIX D-4 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 22-2. TRUCK 022 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1971 Mack TTDIE 11. 0 1 Litre 1-6 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
13-FTP
13-FTP
EMPTY LOAD
HC
1. 23
1. 05
3.78
2. 65
3. 79
3. 27
2. 58
2. 44
3. 33
3. 03
2. 38
1. 40
1. 62
1. 75
1. 74
CO
4. 5
2.6
4.7
3.6
4. 0
3.3
2.0
23. 3
5. 1
3. 5
1. 5
5. 1
8. 2
9.4
9.8
C02
95
132
528
421
617
727
835
1636
678
679
780
251
389
513
660
- 11113
NOX
1.35
3. 18
5. 84
6.72
6. 72
10.34
18.48
24. 3 1
7.09
9.74
17. 13
3.76
5.52
7.61
9.96
KG
Fuel*
33.35
43.79
171. 56
136. 20
198.99
232. 77
265.39
526. 69
218.40
217.46
247. 67
82.58
127.55
167. 15
213. 27
HALF LOAD - 22226 KG
HC
0.96
0.90
3.47
2. 65
3. 88
3. 28
2.70
1.37
2.68
2.97
2. 50
1. 24
1. 40
1.43
1.33
2. 29
2. 25
CO
3. 0
1. 5
3.3
2. 4
3. 0
2.4
4.4
17.0
9.3
9.0
7. 3
6.9
10. 6
12.6
13. 5
11. 10
10. 10
C02
95
129
489
429
675
798
1025
2174
788
829
1038
277
463
584
796
899
893
NOX
1. 55
3. 07
5.76
7. 02
6.98
11.41
22. 71
37.91
8.55
12.38
24.83
4.30
7. 12
8. 81
12.42
13. 72
13. 52
Fuel*
32. 06
42. 01
158. 24
138.39
216. 94
254. 55
326. 11
691. 06
254. 17
267. 12
331. 41
91. 61
151. 66
190. 73
257. 56
293.96
294. 57
FULL LOAD - 33340 KG
HC
0.95
0.93
3.29
2. 64
3.97
3.28
Z. 55
0. 78
2.43
1.69
1.81
1.23
1.31
1.30
1.21
CO
3. 0
1.9
3. 4
2. 4
3. 3
2.6
11. 5
20. 1
12. 2
11. 1
13. 1
8.9
12.3
14.8
17.3
C02
94
128
467
434
685
841
1202
2056
1011
963
1168
377
584
747
913
NOX
1. 51
2.90
5. 57
6.82
6.95
11. 66
27. 64
38. 34
11. 52
14. 31
28. 24
5. 72
8.27
10. 86
13. 89
Fuel*
31. 87
41.95
151. 26
139. 69
220.30
268.05
385. 03
655. 24
325.44
308.97
374. 24
123. 67
190.42
242.83
295. 78
*Fuel Consumption in Grams/Minute
13-FTP - 13-Mode Federal Test Procedure
-------
d
APPENDIX D-4 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 22-3. TRUCK 022 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1971 Mack TTDIE 11. 01 Litre I-6 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Dose.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD - 11113 KG
HC
36. 80
24.05
22.06
19. 44
19. 03
14. 04
9. 74
4.63
15. 25
13.91
9.60
16.96
12.67
10.48
8. 18
CO
135. 1
58. 6
27. 2
26. 3
20. 2
14. 3
7.5
44. 3
23.2
16.3
6.0
61.2
64. 1
56. 2
45. 9
co2
2863
3023
3078
3088
3099
3124
3148
3106
3106
3121
3151
3041
3050
3069
3092
NOX
40.56
72. 65
34.06
49. 36
33. 78
44. 43
69.64
46. 17
32.46
44.77
69. 15
45.54
43. 26
45.53
46.70
HALF LOAD - 22226 KG
HC
29.94
21.41
21.90
19. 18
17.89
12.87
8. 29
1.99
10.54
11. 13
7.56
13.56
9.23
7.49
5. 16
CO
92.2
36.8
20. 6
17.4
13.8
9.4
13.4
24. 6
36.7
33.8
22. 1
75.5
69.9
66. 1
52.4
COz
2951
3065
3089
3103
3112
3135
3 143
3145
3099
3102
3132
3029
3051
3063
3092
NOX
48. 33
73. 11
36.40
50.72
32. 16
44. 83
69.65
54.86
33. 62
46.35
74.93
46.94
46.96
46. 21
48. 21
FULL LOAD
HC
29. 92
22. 15
21. 76
18. 88
18. 01
12. 24
6. 62
1. 20
7.47
5.49
4.84
9.91
6.86
5.36
4. 10
CO
93.6
45. 0
22. 5
17. 1
14.8
9.8
29.7
30.7
37.4
36. 1
34.9
72.3
64.4
61. 0
58.5
- 33340 KG
C02
2949
3050
3087
3104
3110
3136
3123
3138
3108
3116
3120
3046
3067
3077
3085
NOX
47. 32
69. 11
36. 84
48. 81
31. 54
43.49
71. 78
58.52
35. 39
46.32
75.46
46. 23
43.40
44.73
46.96
-------
d
TABLE 22-4.
1971 Mack TTDIE
APPENDIX D-4 (Cont'd.)
TRUCK 022 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
11. 01 Litre 1-6 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4 133
EMPTY LOAD - 111 13 KG
HALF LOAD - 22226 KG
FULL LOAD - 33340 KG
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
Rack,
RPM
625
574
1749
1466
1820
1680
1380
1860
%
0.
0.
35.
16.
38.
33.
20.
55.
0
0
5
7
9
3
5
5
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Period
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
81
82
86
91
92
93
94
36.
72.
216.
0
0
0
51
52
56
61
62
63
64
Rack,
RPM
613
570
1699
1450
1850
1700
1377
1895
%
0.
0.
31.
18.
48.
36.
23.
100.
0
0
6
9
3
1
3
0
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Period
36.
72.
216.
0
0
0
21
22
26
31
32
33
34
RPM
620
564
1670
1455
1850
1685
1375
1731
Rack,
%
0.0
0. 0
30. 0
18.9
48.8
36. 1
26. 6
100. 0
Period
36.
72.
216.
0
0
0
-------
o
TABLE 23-1.
1972 IHC TTDIE
APPENDIX D-5
TRUCK 023 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
9.31LitreV-8 GVW 34700 KG Project 1 1-4133
Tpst
D.-se.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
FMPTY LOAD -
HC
8. 69
4.83
3.92
2. 87
2. 19
1.69
1.43
_
-
-
6. 10
3.59
2.91
2. 31
CO
34. 0
13. 1
9. 0
6. 1
3. 6
1.9
1. 2
^
_
-
30. 2
13.7
14. 3
8. 2
CO2
2910
1819
1540
1184
1088
1025
1187
_
_
-
Z298
1738
1533
1316
111
NO
61.
42.
38.
32.
33.
35.
48.
_
_
-
62.
51.
45.
42.
13 KG
X
87
70
16
23
35
83
40
85
27
15
83
Fuel*
111.
69.
58.
44.
40.
38.
44.
_
_
-
87.
65.
58.
49.
2
0
3
7
9
4
4
9
8
2
7
HALF L
HC
10.
5.
4.
2.
2.
1.
1.
2.
2.
1.
5.
3.
2.
2.
02
13
34
99
29
71
64
13
11
74
47
92
93
48
CO
40. 0
13. 1
7. 1
4.0
2. 2
1. 1
3. 6
3.7
3. 5
1. 1
23.6
24.3
23.2
21.9
.OAD -
co2
3058
1819
1611
1251
1177
1226
1456
1464
1237
1167
2283
1974
1738
1676
22226 KG
NOX
68. 11
39. 81
36. 44
32. 11
34.33
44. 54
59.78
51. 69
44.76
44.87
65.88
59.00
51.60
52. 13
Fuel*
117.
69.
60.
47.
44.
45.
54.
54.
46.
43.
86.
75.
66.
63.
2
0
8
1
2
9
6
9
5
7
9
3
3
9
FULL I.
HC
12.
5.
4.
2.
2.
1.
2.
2.
2.
1.
6.
3.
2.
2.
11
35
16
89
23
66
01
49
14
77
28
78
84
01
CO
44. 5
13.3
7.9
5. 1
3. 7
1.4
13.8
30. 8
22. 5
2.4
39. 0
30. 0
32.0
30.0
OAD -
CO2
3933
1944
1712
1278
1250
1302
1630
1854
1448
1296
2714
2207
2027
1895
33340 KG
NOy
79. 02
42.48
39. 05
33. 10
36. 16
47. 45
58.98
57.97
47. 21
53. 14
86. 05
70.61
64.82
60. 11
Fuel*
150. 3
73. 7
64. 6
48. 2
47. 0
48. 7
61.7
71.0
55.4
48.6
104. 0
84.3
77.6
72.5
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
o
APPENDIX D-5 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 23-2. TRUCK 023 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1972 IHC TTDIE 9.31 Litre V-8 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
13-FTP
13-FTP
EMPTY
HC
0. 38
1. 12
1. 28
1. 55
1.48
1. 74
1. 79
2. 07
0.99
1. 19
1.47
0. 82
0. 95
1. 11
1. 25
CO
1. 4
4. 4
3. 5
3.6
3. 1
2.9
2. 0
1.8
4. 0
3.6
4.9
4. 1
3.6
5.5
4.4
LOAD -
CO?
94
375
483
607
610
866
1088
1719
668
919
-
310
461
587
711
- 11113 KG
NOX
1.90
7.96
11.34
15.04
16. 60
26.56
38. 04
70.08
17. 04
24. 05
42.55
8.48
13. 59
17. 29
23. 15
Fuel*
30.
120.
154.
193.
194.
274.
343.
541.
212.
290.
-
100.
147.
187.
226.
49
66
32
59
17
74
92
75
19
89
04
14
85
45
HALF LOAD - 22226 KG
HC
0. 42
1. 21
1.36
1. 71
1.59
1.82
1. 83
2.38
1. 16
1. 71
1.91
0. 78
1. 06
1. 15
1.29
1. 73
1.63
CO
1.6
4.8
3. 5
2.8
2. 1
1.8
1.2
5.3
2. 0
2.8
1. 2
3.4
6.6
9. 1
11.4
16. 17
14.53
C02
93
369
483
635
664
937
1312
2121
795
1005
1278
326
536
680
870
1111
1100
NOX
1.69
8. 22
10.57
14.37
17. 05
27. 34
47. 66
87. 04
28.09
36.35
49. 13
9.41
16. 01
20. 20
27. 06
38. 73
38. 33
Fuel*
30.
119.
154.
202.
210.
296.
413.
669.
251.
317.
402.
104.
172.
218.
279.
369.
369.
28
23
42
15
86
49
56
67
45
99
97
64
22
90
53
86
86
FULL LOAD - 33340 KG
HC
0.43
1.27
1.42
1.64
1.53
1.78
1.77
2.91
1.33
1.71
1.90
0.88
1. 02
1. 10
1. 03
CO
1.6
4.7
3.5
3. 1
2.7
2.9
1. 4
19.9
16. 5
17.9
2.6
5.5
8. 1
12.3
15.4
C02
97
411
516
675
679
996
1383
2360
992
1154
1394
379
596
783
975
NOX
1.85
8. 26
1 1. 28
15.39
17.58
28. 80
50.39
85.41
31.02
37. 62
57. 15
12.02
19. 07
25. 04
30.93
Fuel*
31.58
132.48
164.94
214. 66
215.60
3 15. 37
435.94
752.51
320.43
372.22
440. 10
122.42
191. 87
252. 65
3 14. 35
#Fuel Consumption in Grams /Minute
13-FTP - 13-Mode Federal Test Procedure
-------
d
t
CM
O
APPENDIX D-5 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 23-3. TRUCK 023 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1972 IHC TTDIE 9. 31 Litre V-8 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD -111
HC
12.37
9. 27
8.31
7.98
7.61
6.33
5. 21
3. 81
4.65
4. 10
-
8. 23
6.47
5.93
5.52
CO
45.6
36.2
22.6
18.4
16. 1
10.5
5.9
3.3
18.7
12.3
-
40. 8
24.6
29. 1
19.6
CO2
3080
3 104
3129
3136
3141
3154
3165
3173
3146
3158
-
3100
3131
3126
3142
13 KG
NOX
62.34
66.01
73. 46
77. 71
85.47
96.69
110. 62
129.37
80.32
82.66
-
84.79
92.38
92.05
102.25
HALF LOAD
HC
13.91
10. 15
8.82
8.47
7. 52
6. 14
4.43
3.56
4. 60
5.38
4. 74
7.74
6. 17
5.25
4.61
CO
52.0
40.4
22. 6
13.8
10.0
5.9
2.8
7.9
7.9
8.8
3. 0
32.2
38. 2
41.6
40.7
- 22226 KG
C02
3065
3095
3127
3142
3151
3162
3172
3167
3163
3159
3171
3116
3111
3108
3112
NOX
55. 82
68. 94
68.44
71. 06
80.86
92.22
115. 24
129.98
111. 71
114. 29
121.91
89.92
92.97
92.29
96.80
FULL LOAD
HC
13. 77
9. 56
8. 61
7. 65
7. 11
5. 64
4. 05
3. 87
4. 16
4. 59
4. 32
7. 17
5.32
4.35
3.29
CO
50. 1
35. 1
21.4
14. 4
12. 5
9.3
3. 3
26.5
51.4
48. 1
6.0
44. 6
42.3
48.9
49. 1
- 33340 KG
coz
3068
3105
3130
3143
3148
3158
3172
3136
3096
3100
3167
3098
3107
3100
3103
NOX
58. 68
62.38
68.37
71. 71
81. 53
91. 31
115. 60
113. 51
96.80
101. 08
129. 87
98. 21
99.40
99. 10
98.41
-------
o
TABLE 23-4.
1972 IHC TTDIE
APPENDIX D-5 (Cont'd.)
TRUCK 023 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
9.31LitreV-8 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4 133
EMPTY LOAD - 11113 KG
HALF LOAD - 22226 KG
FULL LOAD - 33340 KG
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
RPM
540
1360
1520
1680
1600
1840
1840
1880
Rack,
%
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.8
4.4
11. 1
20. 0
40. 5
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Period
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
81
82
86
91
92
93
94
31.
48.
96.
0
0
0
51
52
56
61
62
63
64
Rack,
RPM
540
1400
1520
1700
1640
1840
1880
1880
%
0.
0.
0.
3.
6.
14.
29.
64.
0
0
0
3
7
4
4
4
Test
No.
1 1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Period
31.
48.
96.
0
0
0
21
22
26
31
32
33
34
Rack,
RPM
540
1400
1520
1720
1640
2000
1860
1920
%
0.
0.
0.
4.
7.
16.
32.
83.
0
0
0
4
2
7
2
3
Period
31.
48.
96.
0
0
0
-------
APPENDIX D-6
TABLE 24-1. TRUCK 024 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
1975 Ford TTDIE 9.31LitreV-8 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4 133
Tost
Dose.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
O 30±5
£ 40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
13.83
7.88
5.92
3. 61
2. 50
1.99
1.61
3. 04
2.86
2. 01
7.55
4.81
3. 73
3.27
CO
35.9
23. 1
17.0
12.3
6.0
4.8
3.5
4.8
3.9
2.0
20.3
15.8
14.0
12.9
C02
4699
2949
2420
1505
1364
1272
1331
1625
1398
1247
2769
2186
1903
1726
11113 KG
NOX
32.53
20.06
16. 18
11. 61
11.03
11.74
17.03
18. 11
15.42
14.38
31. 11
25.31
21.52
21. 19
Fuel*
178.5
111.9
91.7
57. 1
51.4
47.8
49.9
61. 1
52.6
46.7
105. 1
82.8
72.0
65.3
HALF LOAD - 22226 KG
HC
12.74
7. 17
5.80
3.44
2.61
2.05
1.73
3.57
3. 17
2.65
7.38
4.88
4. 19
3.25
CO
31. 6
17. 2
13.0
6. 1
4. 4
2.2
1.9
4.6
5.9
2.8
34. 1
24.9
22.9
23.2
C02
4693
2944
2478
1541
1400
1388
1508
1907
1588
1367
3049
2500
2280
2050
NOX
33. 34
20.84
17.87
12.39
12. 65
14.93
23.40
26. 77
22.82
16.86
44.07
37.39
33. 15
31. 72
Fuel*
177.9
111.3
93.6
58. 1
52.6
52. 0
56.4
71.6
59.8
51.3
116.3
95.0
86.6
78.0
FULL LOAD - 33340 KG
HC
13. 13
7.47
5.93
3.66
2. 68
2.24
2.46
3. 19
2.70
2.44
7.66
5. 19
3.90
3. 20
CO
21.3
14.9
4.4
5.5
3.0
2.6
30.5
32.7
30. 1
5.0
33.5
44. 7
43.4
45.0
C02
4759
2983
2558
1580
1622
1752
2266
2413
1964
1706
3578
2951
2827
2632
NOX
33. 15
20.36
17.65
12.94
15. 19
21.88
45.66
41. 07
33. 61
26. 15
57. 18
46.58
45. 20
45. 29
Fuel*
179.8
112.7
96. 1
59.5
60.8
65.6
86.4
92.0
75. 1
64.0
135.9
113.0
108. 1
100.9
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
APPENDIX D-6 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 24-2. TRUCK 024 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1975 Ford TTDIE 9.31 Litre V-8 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
d 20±5
il) 30±5
W 40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
13-FTP
13-FTP
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
0. 60
2.00
2.22
2.33
1.95
2.01
2. 13
2. 36
1. 60
2. 28
2. 15
1.05
1.32
1.48
1.71
CO
0. 7
5. 2
6.5
6.7
6. 6
4.8
5. 2
5. 2
2.5
3. 1
2.2
2.8
4.3
5. 6
6.7
co2
119
680
830
954
811
1098
1361
I960
857
1116
1334
387
601
756
908
11113 KG
NOX
1. 77
4. 71
5.65
6.38
6.26
8. 87
12.57
25. 07
9. 55
12.31
15.38
4.35
6.96
8.55
11. 14
Fuel*
38. 18
217.82
265. 65
304. 61
259.44
348.41
431. 21
619. 33
271.37
353.68
421. 28
123. 70
191.92
241.30
289. 51
HALF LOAD - 22226 KG
HC
0. 50
1. 74
1.96
2.29
1.86
2. 12
2. 18
2.52
1.91
2.54
2.82
0.98
1.32
1.65
1.72
1.54
1.46
CO
0.9
4.3
4.7
5. 1
3.3
3.6
2.4
2.7
2. 4
4. 7
3.0
4.5
6.7
9.0
12. 2
11.05
11. 12
C02
124
642
805
977
830
1138
1474
2196
1023
1273
1458
405
677
899
1080
1175
1175
NOX
1.98
4.56
5.70
7. 04
6.68
10.28
15.86
34.07
14.35
18.29
17.98
5.85
10. 13
13.07
16.72
20.23
20.09
Fuel*
39. 80
205. 03
256.67
310.99
263. 75
360.52
465.30
692.29
323. 65
403. 83
461. 16
130.09
216.86
287.92
346.33
370.76
369.55
FULL LOAD - 33340 KG
HC
0.52
1. 80
1.98
2. 34
1.92
2. 16
2.38
3.58
1. 70
2. 11
2.61
1.07
1. 43
1. 52
1.66
CO
0.7
2.9
4. 0
1.7
2.9
2.4
2.8
44. 4
17.4
23. 6
5.3
4.7
12.3
16.9
23.3
C02
125
651
792
1009
826
1305
1860
3300
1285
1538
1825
499
811
1099
1366
NOX
1.96
4.53
5.41
6.96
6.77
12. 22
23. 24
66.49
21.87
26.32
27.97
7.98
12.80
17.57
23. 50
Fuel*
39.99
207. 24
252. 14
319. 28
262.34
412.38
586. 80
1059.90
412.99
495. 84
577.39
159.91
261. 74
354. 37
441. 18
*Fuel Consumption in Grams /Minute
13-FTP - 13-Mode Federal Test Procedure
-------
c
APPENDIX D-6 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 24-3. TRUCK 024 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1975 Ford TTDIE 9.31 Litre V-8 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD - 11113 KG
HC
15.75
9. 20
8.35
7.66
7.50
5.76
4.94
3.82
5.90
6.45
5. 10
8.52
6.89
6. 15
5.94
CO
19.6
23.9
24.4
22. 1
25. 5
13.8
11.9
8.4
9.4
8.8
5. 1
22.9
22. 6
23. 1
23.4
C02
3110
3124
3126
3131
3127
3150
3156
3165
3157
3156
3166
3127
3133
3135
3135
NOX
46.33
21. 63
21. 26
20.94
24. 12
25.47
29. 14
40.48
35. 20
34.79
36.50
35. 13
36. 28
35.45
38.48
HALF LOAD - 22226 KG
HC
12.62
8.50
7.64
7.35
7.03
5.89
4.68
3.64
5.91
6.29
6. 12
7.53
6.09
5.74
4.95
CO
22.4
21. 1
18. 3
16. 5
12. 4
9.9
5. 1
3.9
7. 5
11. 6
6. 6
34.8
31. 0
31.3
35. 2
C02
3115
3130
3137
3141
3149
3156
3167
3173
3160
3152
3161
3112
3122
3123
3119
NOX
49.77
22.24
22. 21
22.65
25.33
28.50
34.08
49. 22
44.35
45.30
38.98
44.97
46. 69
45.39
48.28
FULL LOAD
HC
13. 10
8. 67
7.86
7.32
7.30
5. 24
4. 06
3.38
4. 11
4.26
4. 51
6.69
5.45
4.28
3.76
CO
16.8
14. 1
15.7
5.4
10.9
5.8
4.8
41.9
42. 1
47.6
9.2
29.2
46.9
47.6
52.9
- 33340 KG
C02
3123
3141
3141
3159
3150
3165
3170
3114
3111
3102
3161
3123
3099
3102
3095
NOX
48.92
21.88
21.44
21.79
25.79
29.63
39.60
62.73
52.95
53.08
48.45
49.91
48.91
49.59
53. 26
-------
TABLE 24-4.
1975 Ford TTDIE
APPENDIX D-6 (Cont'd.)
TRUCK 024 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
9.31LitreV-8 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4133
EMPTY LOAD- 11113 KG
HALF LOAD - 22226 KG
FULL LOAD - 33340 KG
ro
Ul
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
81
82
86
91
92
93
94
Rack,
RPM
575
1775
1930
2065
1750
1905
1910
1935
Period
29. 0
44.0
70. 0
%
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
7.
17.
34.
0
0
0
0
0
8
8
4
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
51
52
56
61
62
63
64
Rack,
RPM
575
1700
1850
2025
1750
1920
1910
1935
Period
29.0
44. 0
70.0
%
0.
0.
0.
1.
1.
7.
20.
36.
0
0
0
1
1
8
0
6
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
21
22
26
31
32
33
34
RPM
565
1750
1855
2050
1715
1920
1925
1950
Period
29.0
44. 0
70.0
Rack
%
0.0
0.0
0.2
1. 1
1. 1
13.9
32. 2
66.0
-------
D
APPENDIX D-6 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 24-5. TRUCK 024 REPEAT SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
1975 Ford TTDIE 9.31 Litre V-8 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4133
Tost
Dt-sc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
14. 20
8. 58
6.87
4. 05
2.95
2. 40
1. 94
3. 14
2. 64
2. 05
7. 22
5.04
4.00
3. 14
CO
15.5
10.3
10.9
5.6
4.0
2.6
1.6
6.7
5. 1
3.9
22. 2
13.3
14. 1
14.7
C02
4753
2951
2485
1548
1371
1276
1304
1507
1333
1194
2781
2155
1880
1744
11113 KG
NOX
33.32
21. 27
17.95
12.54
11.55
12.90
17.59
15.27
13.62
12.63
34.35
26.76
22.48
23.40
Fuel*
179. 3
111.4
93.9
58.4
51.6
47.9
48.8
56.8
50.2
44. 9
105.6
81.5
71.2
66. 1
HALF LOAD -
HC
14.30
8.26
6.65
3.93
2.91
2.30
1.96
3.31
2.48
2. 17
7.50
5.01
3.78
3.09
CO
26. 8
14.6
11.9
6.9
4. 5
3.0
2.7
6. 1
4. 8
3. 6
28. 7
27. 1
24.3
23. 1
C02
4932
3003
2467
1581
1428
1397
1534
2081
1433
1301
3136
2634
2255
2099
22226 KG
NOX
33.00
20.77
17.48
12.55
12.53
14.85
25. 36
25. 73
20.86
15.72
45.38
39.98
32.36
33. 20
Fuel*
186. 6
113. 5
93.2
59.7
53.7
52.4
57. 5
78. 1
53.9
48.8
119. 2
100. 1
85.7
79.8
FULL LOAD - 33340 KG
HC
14.31
7.88
6.86
4.06
3.01
2. 69
2.74
3.35
2. 73
2.42
8.40
5. 15
3.89
3.38
CO
27.7
17.0
10.8
7. 1
5.5
4.0
28. 1
32.7
26.4
5.0
51.5
49.5
37.0
43.3
C02
5088
2904
2601
1691
1592
1846
2223
2432
1981
1715
3684
3124
2813
2714
NOX
35.69
20.01
18. 17
14.09
15.78
24. 18
49.22
41.32
35.58
26.39
57. 18
50.77
44.81
47.90
Fuel*
192.5
109.9
98.2
63. 8
59.9
69.2
84.7
92.7
75. 5
64.4
141.0
119.7
107. 2
103.9
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
TABLE 24-6.
1975 Ford TTDIE
APPENDIX D-6 (Cont'd.)
TRUCK 024 REPEAT SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
9.3lLitreV-8 GVW 34700 KG Project 1 1-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
G 20±5
N 30±5
""" 40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD
HC
0.53
2.06
2. 28
2. 76
2. 15
2.40
2.55
2. 86
1.70
2. 14
2. 24
0.98
1.44
1. 62
1.69
CO
0.4
2. 2
2. 7
4.4
2.9
3. 2
2.8
2.4
3. 6
4. 2
4. 2
3. 0
3. 8
5. 7
7.9
C02
125
688
783
1000
822
1114
1355
1930
815
1081
1305
377
616
760
941
- 11113
NOX
1.97
4. 83
5. 65
7. 22
6. 66
9.38
13. 69
26.04
8. 25
11. 05
13. 81
4. 66
7. 65
9.09
12. 63
KG
Fuel*
40. 06
218.86
249. 18
318. 20
261. 23
353. 19
428. 79
608. 89
258. 87
342.97
413.46
120.67
196.31
242. 59
300. 67
HALF LOAD - 22226 KG
HC
0. 56
1.96
2. 19
2.67
2.08
2.32
2.44
2.87
1.67
1.92
2.28
1.08
1.41
1.58
1.65
CO
0.7
3.7
3.9
4.8
3.7
3.6
3. 1
3.9
3. 1
3.7
3. 8
4. 1
7.6
10. 1
12. 3
C02
121
674
797
992
840
1137
1484
2247
1049
1109
1367
451
740
940
1118
NOX
1.84
4.51
5. 52
7.03
6.66
9.98
15.76
37. 13
12.98
16. 15
16.52
6.52
11. 23
13.49
17. 69
Fuel*
38.88
215. 15
253.95
316. 04
267.08
360.43
469. 13
709.00
332.03
351.45
432.75
144.42
236.98
301. 29
358. 11
HC
0. 53
1.96
2. 15
2.76
2.09
2.45
2. 71
4.02
1. 82
2. 19
2.62
1. 19
1.58
1.59
1.78
FULL LOAD -
CO
0. 8
3. 8
4. 6
4.4
3. 6
4.5
4. 0
41. 1
17. 8
21.3
5.4
7.3
14.0
15. 2
22.9
C02
122
696
794
1046
871
1294
1857
3256
1320
1593
1858
524
907
1153
1433
33340 KG
NOX
1. 88
4. 88
5.47
7.31
7. 25
12. 82
24.32
72. 07
22.44
28.61
28.59
8. 13
14. 69
18. 36
25. 29
Fuel*
39. 06
221.92
253.44
332.85
276. 84
410. 18
586. 61
1044. 72
424. 42
512. 01
587. 64
169. 06
292.90
370. 34
462. 17
*Fuel Consumption in Grams/Minute
-------
APPENDIX D-6 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 24-7. TRUCK 024 REPEAT SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1975 Ford TTDIE 9.31LitreV-8 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4133
Tost
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
O
£ 20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD - 11113 KG
HC
13. 14
9.39
9. 14
8.69
8.24
6.79
5.95
4.70
6.55
6.23
5.41
8. 11
7.34
6.67
5.64
CO
11. 2
10. 2
11.0
13.8
11.3
9. 2
6.5
4. 0
14.0
12.2
10. 2
25.0
19.4
23.4
26.3
CO2
3131
3145
3144
3141
3147
3154
3161
3169
3148
3151
3157
3125
3137
3132
3131
NOX
49. 06
22.05
22.66
22.69
25.49
26.56
31.94
42. 77
31.89
32. 22
33.40
38. 60
38.96
37.46
42. 01
HALF LOAD - 22226 KG
HC
14.44
9.09
8.64
8.46
7.81
6.42
5.21
4.05
5.02
5.46
5.28
7.46
5.94
5.23
4. 60
CO
16.8
17. 1
15.3
15. 1
13.8
9.9
6.7
5.5
9. 2
10.5
8.7
28.6
32.2
33.6
34.3
CO2
3118
3135
3139
3140
3144
3154
3163
3169
3160
3156
3160
3122
3121
3121
3122
NOX
47. 26
20.97
21.72
22.24
29.94
27.68
33. 60
52.37
39.08
45.94
38. 18
45. 17
47.37
44.79
49.39
FULL LOAD - 33340
HC
13. 53
8. 82
8. 50
8. 28
7.55
5.97
4. 62
3.85
4. 29
4. 28
4.46
7.07
5. 11
4.30
3.86
CO
19.6
17. 1
18.3
13. 1
13. 1
10.9
6.8
39.4
41.8
41.5
9.3
43.3
49. 1
40.9
49.5
CO2
3117
3136
3135
3144
3146
3154
3165
3116
3111
3111
3162
3100
3097
3112
3100
KG
NOX
48. 13
21.99
21. 60
21.96
26.20
31.25
41.46
68.99
52.87
55.88
48. 65
48. 12
50.33
49.58
54.72
-------
APPENDIX D-6 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 24-8. TRUCK 024 ALTERNATE DRIVING CYCLE SUMMARY
1975 Ford TTDIE 9.3lLitreV-8 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4 133
Test
Desc.
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
CO
CO2
11113 KG HALF LOAD - 22226 KG
NOX
Fuel HC CO
COz
NOX
Fuel
FULL LOAD - 33340 KG
HC
CO
C02
NOX
Fuel
Grams /Kilometre
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
5. 10
3. 75
2.90
2.48
22.4
15. 1
12. 1
8. 1
2413
1861
1550
1335
29.43
24.34
19. 82
15. 43
91.6* 6.89 32.8
70.5* 4.12 30.7
58.7* 3.03 26.0
50.4* 2. 51 16. 1
2689
2138
1845
1597
39.49
34. 20
29.41
22.99
102.7*
81. 8*
70. 5*
60. 6*
6.47
4.32
3. 25
2.61
42.3
36.9
43.4
29.3
2934
2670
2458
1964
46.99
44.38
43.72
33.87
112.3*
101.9*
94. 3*
75.0*
Grams /Minute
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
0. 65
1.01
1. 19
1.28
2.9
4. 1
4.9
4. 2
308
502
633
688
3.76
6.57
8. 09
7.95
98.62 0.77 3.7
160.32 1.10 8.2
201.96 1.24 10.6
218.87 1.28 8.2
302
568
755
817
4.43
9.08
12.03
11.75
97. 18
183. 08
243.05
261. 26
0.81
1. 09
1. 25
1.32
5.3
9.3
16.7
14. 8
366
675
947
992
5.86
11. 22
16. 85
17. 11
117.98
217. 24
306.40
319. 68
Grams/Kilogram of Fuel
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
6.60
6.30
5.87
5.83
29.0
25.5
24.4
19. 0
3124
3130
3133
3142
38. 11
40.96
40. 05
36.32
7.96 37.9
5.98 44.5
5.10 43.8
4.90 31.5
3106
3101
3105
3125
45.61
49.61
49.51
44.99
6.84
5. 02
4.09
4. 12
44.7
42.9
54.6
46.4
3098
3107
3091
3 104
49.63
51. 65
54.99
53. 54
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
APPENDIX D-7
TABLE 25-1. TRUCK 025 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
1975 IHC TTDIE 14.01 Litre 1-6 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Dcsc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
d
w 20±5
0 30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY
HC
9.52
8.95
4.46
3.98
2.23
1. 75
0.88
4.77
2.53
1.67
9.91
6. 17
5.50
3.61
CO
17.7
19.4
9.7
9.0
6.7
7.5
4.6
11.3
7.6
8. 1
23.9
20.6
14.4
12.4
LOAD -
C02
2355
2445
1219
1200
950
1038
928
1329
950
1030
2005
1586
1315
1248
11113 KG
NOX
11.41
13.00
6.78
6.73
6.21
8. 14
10.67
9.44
7.65
8.48
15.80
13. 22
11.65
12.49
Fuel*
89.7
93. 1
46.4
45.6
36.0
39.2
34.9
50.6
36. 1
39.0
77. 1
60.9
50.4
47.5
HALF LOAD - 22226 KG
HC
10. 22
8.41
4. 24
3. 70
1.98
1.58
0.82
6.34
3.42
1.51
9. 13
6.31
4.95
3.26
CO
16. 7
17.8
9.8
9.7
7.4
8.0
5.5
12.4
8.4
7.2
24.5
20.5
20.7
15.0
C02
2073
2449
1306
1263
1031
1214
1282
1528
1194
1253
2286
2047
1854
1709
NOX
10.78
12.86
7. 10
7. 27
7.42
10.94
22.51
13.87
13.71
12.03
19.30
19.79
18.44
21.21
Fuel*
79.3
93. 1
49. 6
48.0
39.0
45.8
48. 1
58,3
45.3
47.2
87.5
78. 1
70.8
64.8
FULL LOAD - 33340 KG
HC
10.50
8.32
4.35
3.59
1.85
1.48
0.75
7.08
4.39
1.46
9. 13
7.36
5. 10
3.19
CO
17.8
18.9
9.6
9.6
7.6
7.4
9.4
14. 1
12. 1
6.8
25.7
26.8
25.0
16.9
C02
2151
2465
1297
1259
1133
1392
1613
1894
1373
1411
3310
2512
2503
2113
NOX
10.83
12.59
6.92
7.01
8. 54
13. 61
34. 86
21.73
20.88
16. 62
35.68
29. 17
30.22
30.68
Fuel*
82.3
93.7
49.3
47.8
42.8
52.4
60.6
72. 1
52.3
53.0
125.7
95.9
95.2
80.0
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving cycle with designated average speed
-------
APPENDIX D-7 (Cont'd. )
TABLE 25-2. TRUCK 025 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1975 IHC TTDIE 14.01 Litre 1-6 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
13-FTP
13-FTP
EMPTY
HC
0. 55
1. 30
2.38
1.76
2. 11
1.76
1.87
1. 27
2.43
1.94
1.73
1.39
1.71
2. 19
1.90
CO
1. 1
2.4
5. 2
3. 8
4. 8
5. 3
8. 0
6. 6
5. 7
5.9
8.4
3.4
5. 7
5.7
6.5
LOAD
C02
90
322
649
481
637
749
1110
1337
677
728
1071
281
440
524
658
- 11113
NOX
0.49
1.56
3.45
2.67
3.57
4.90
8.71
15.37
4.81
5.87
8.82
2.21
3.67
4. 64
6.59
KG
Fuel*
29. 22
103.45
208.35
154. 28
204. 09
239.03
353.83
423. 62
217. 58
233. 11
341. 64
91. 03
142.54
169.35
211.36
HALF LOAD - 22226 KG
HC
0.55
1.40
2.23
1.71
1.99
1.58
1.69
1. 19
3.27
2.71
1.61
1.36
1.79
1.99
1.70
1.27
1.29
CO
1.0
2.3
4. 7
4. 0
5. 2
5.9
8.6
8.0
6.4
6.7
7.6
3.7
5.8
8.3
7.8
8.02
7.33
COZ
89
283
650
525
681
821
1299
1866
788
946
1336
341
582
747
891
1152
1149
NOX
0.49
1.47
3.41
2.86
3.92
5.91
11.71
32.77
7. 15
10.86
12.83
2.88
5. 63
7.42
11.05
17.08
17.23
Fuel*
29.07
91. 36
208.35
168.30
217.90
261.80
413. 16
590. 08
253. 22
302.52
424.05
110. 01
187.01
240. 09
284.71
362.60
362.60
FULL LOAD - 33340 KG
HC
0. 54
1. 44
2.27
1. 71
1.88
1.46
1.57
1.09
3.55
3.37
1.54
1.34
2.03
1.94
1.65
CO
1.0
2.4
5.2
3.8
5.0
6.0
7.8
13.8
7. 1
9.3
7. 1
3.8
7.4
9.5
8.7
C02
90
294
674
511
658
893
1478
2362
950
1053
1483
486
692
953
1091
NOX
0.48
1.48
3.44
2.73
3. 66
6.74
14.45
51.04
10.90
16.01
17.47
5. 24
8.03
11.51
15.84
Fuel*
29. 15
94.82
216. 12
163.85
210. 63
284.47
468. 79
748.41
304. 71
338.04
469.92
155.58
222. 50
305. 48
347. 96
*Fuel Consumption in Grams/Minute
13-FTP - 13-Mode Federal Test Procedure
-------
APPENDIX D-7 (Cont'd.)
TABLE Z5-3. TRUCK 025 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1975 IHC TTDIE 14.01 Litre 1-6 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Dose.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD - 111
HC
18.91
12. 58
11.41
11.39
10.35
7.35
5.28
3.00
11. 17
8.31
5.08
15.25
12.03
12.94
9.00
CO
37.0
23.5
24.7
24.8
23. 5
22. 1
22. 6
15. 7
26.4
25. 2
24. 6
36.8
40.2
33.9
30.8
C02
3073
3114
3115
3115
3121
3132
3138
3156
3114
3125
3136
3084
3089
3096
3113
13 KG
NOX
16. 66
15.08
16.57
17.32
17.50
20.50
24. 63
36.28
22. 12
25. 16
25.81
24.32
25.76
27.42
31. 18
HALF LOAD
HC
18.95
15. 29
10.71
10. 14
9. 14
6.03
4.09
2.01
12.91
8.95
3.80
12.37
9.59
8. 29
5.96
CO
33.3
25.0
22.7
23.5
23.9
22.4
20.7
13.6
25. 2
22. 1
18.0
33.3
31. 1
34.8
27.5
- 22226
coz
3078
3103
3121
3121
3124
3136
3145
3162
3110
3127
3150
3099
3111
3109
3128
KG
NOX
16.77
16. 14
16.39
16.98
17.99
22. 56
28.34
55.54
28.23
35.91
30.25
26. 16
30.08
30.92
38.82
FULL LOAD
HC
18.36
15. 14
10.52
10.46
8.90
5. 13
3.34
1.46
11.65
9.96
3.27
8.62
9. 11
6.36
4.73
CO
33.3
25.6
23.9
23. 1
23.9
21. 1
16.7
18.4
23.3
27.4
15. 1
24.3
33. 1
31.2
25. 1
- 33340 KG
coz
3080
3102
3120
3121
3125
3141
3153
3157
3117
3116
3156
3125
3110
3121
3136
NOX
16. 62
15. 62
15.94
16.64
17.40
23.68
30.82
68.20
35.77
47.37
37. 18
33.68
36. 10
37.68
45.52
-------
APPENDIX D-7 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 25-4. TRUCK 025 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
1975 IHC TTDIE 14. 01 Litre 1-6 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4133
EMPTY LOAD- 11113 KG
HALF LOAD - 22226 KG
FULL LOAD - 33340 KG
0
I
LO
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
81
82
86
91
92
93
94
Rail,
RPM
650
1300
1920
1600
1770
1680
I960
1700
Period
34. 0
51. 0
96. 0
psi
0.
6.
12.
9.
12.
17.
31.
45.
4
0
0
0
4
0
6
0
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
51
52
56
61
62
63
64
Rail,
RPM
650
1300
1900
1630
1800
1700
1970
1700
Period
34. 0
51.0
96.0
psi
0.
5.
13.
10.
15.
22.
42.
79.
4
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
21
22
26
31
32
33
34
RPM
650
1300
1900
1580
1770
1700
1980
1700 1
Period
34.0
51. 0
96.0
Rail,
psi
0.4
4.0
13.6
10.2
14.4
25.6
52.0
16.4
-------
APPENDIX D-7 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 25-5. TRUCK OZ5 REPEAT SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
1975 IHC TTDIE 14. 01 Litre 1-6 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
9.95
8.33
4.41
3.79
2.03
1.51
0.67
4.90
2.32
1.57
10.49
7.07
5.41
3.67
CO
20.2
20.9
10.6
10.9
7. 5
8.8
5.5
13. 2
8.8
9.4
28.3
19.8
16.9
16.2
CO?
2131
2404
1250
1260
916
1082
954
1323
974
1076
2300
1620
1449
1387
11113 KG
NOX
10. 17
11.93
6.43
6.65
5.62
7.78
10. 12
9.78
8.09
9. 12
20.49
12.46
11.69
12.69
Fuel*
81.6
91.6
47.6
47.9
34. 7
40.9
35.9
50. 6
37.0
40.8
88.5
62. 2
55.5
53. 0
HALF LOAD - 2i
HC
11. 65
8.74
4.41
3.88
2.03
1.52
0.74
6.90
3. 98
1.64
8.95
6. 22
4.58
3. 25
CO
18.5
17.9
8.9
9.4
7.7
8.4
5.6
13. 0
9.7
8.7
30. 2
24.3
19.9
16.5
CC-2
2295
2452
1250
1295
1038
1245
1222
1414
1030
1220
2191
2131
1870
1689
>226 KG
NOX
11.41
12.02
6.46
6.75
6.65
10.26
20.46
12.48
11.21
11.35
19. 19
19.70
15.52
20.47
Fuel*
87.8
93.2
47.5
49.2
39.3
47. 0
45.9
54.2
39.4
46. 1
84.3
81. 5
71.3
64.2
1
HC
10.38
8.77
4.44
3.66
1.92
1.51
0.69
7.39
4.55
1.57
10.09
7. 18
5.26
3.61
PULL L
CO
.
16.7
17.9
9.3
9.5
7.8
8.0
9.7
18.3
13.8
9.2
37.9
27.9
24.6
21.6
,OAD - :
C02
.
2078
2459
1303
1310
1124
1437
1607
1932
1351
1495
2722
2546
2300
2023
33340 KC
NOX
_
10. 22
11. 59
6.47
7. 18
7. 62
13. 66
35.55
21.89
19.93
16.76
26.60
26.57
26.07
27.62
Fuel*
„
79.5
93.5
49.5
49.7
42. 5
54. 1
60.4
73.8
51.6
56.3
104.6
97.2
87.6
77.0
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
APPENDIX D-7 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 25-6. TRUCK 025 REPEAT SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1975 IHC TTDIE 14.01 Litre 1-6 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
0.62
1. 68
2.48
1.78
2. 07
1 63
1.61
0.98
2. 60
1.86
1.69
1.43
1. 94
2. 19
1.94
CO
1. 1
3. 4
6.2
4.3
6.0
6. 0
9.4
8. 1
7. 0
7. 1
10. 1
3.8
5. 4
6. 8
8.6
COz
92
360
716
503
689
737
1157
1404
702
781
1162
313
445
587
734
11113 K
NOX
0. 52
1. 72
3.55
2.59
3. 64
4. 53
8. 33
14. 91
5. 18
6.48
9.85
2.79
3.42
4.74
6.72
.G
Fuel*
29.93
116. 21
229.79
161. 50
221. 00
235. 63
369.06
445. 04
225.91
250.07
371.05
101.42
143.93
189. 36
236. 27
HA
HC
0.60
1.59
2.46
1.78
2.09
1.65
1.64
1. 10
3.45
3.00
1.71
1.30
1.72
1.79
1.66
LF LO
CO
1.0
2. 5
5.0
3.6
5. 1
6.3
9. 1
8.3
6.5
7.3
9. 1
4.4
6.7
7.8
8.4
AD - 22
C02
90
314
690
503
698
844
1342
1810
706
111
1273
317
588
730
863
,226 KG
NOX
0.50
1.56
3.38
2. 60
3. 64
5.41
11. 06
30.29
6.23
8.45
11.85
2.78
5.43
6.06
10.46
Fuel*
29. 18
101.20
221.29
161. 15
223.43
269. 16
426.67
572.44
227.97
249.96
405.36
102.89
189. 16
234.30
276.23
Jb i
HC
0.55
1.42
2.40
1.82
2. 00
1.54
1. 62
1. 02
3.80
3.53
1.63
1.46
1.94
2.06
1. 81
JLL LU
CO
0.9
2.3
4.9
3.8
5.2
6. 3
8.6
14.3
9.4
10.7
9.5
5.5
7.5
9.6
10. 8
AJJ - JJ
C02
89
284
673
535
716
904
1550
2366
993
1048
1553
394
687
899
1012
i<±u r\vj
NOX
0. 44
1. 40
3. 17
2. 66
3. 93
6. 13
14. 73
52.34
11. 26
15.46
17.40
3. 85
7. 17
10. 19
13. 82
Fuel*
29. 00
9 1. 60
215. 65
171. 25
229. 11
287. 97
491. 59
749. 76
319.73
337.32
493.01
127. 68
220.93
238. 70
324. 37
*Fuel Consumption in Grams /Minute
-------
o
I
OJ
cr-
APPENDIX D-7 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 25-7. TRUCK 025 REPEAT SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1975 IHC TTDIE 14. 01 Litre 1-6 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20 ±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD - 11113 KG
HC
20.67
14.47
10.79
10.99
9. 38
6.92
4.37
2. 20
11.51
7.43
4.56
14.07
13.48
11.57
8.22
CO
36.9
29.4
27.0
26.5
27.0
25. 5
25.5
18. 1
31.1
28.4
27.3
37.9
37.8
36.0
36.3
C02
3067
3099
3114
3114
3118
3128
3136
3155
3105
3122
3133
3086
3088
3097
3107
NOX
17.46
14.79
15.45
16.02
16.45
19.21
22.57
33.49
22.95
25.92
26.55
27.49
23.76
25.01
28.43
HALF LOAD - 22226 KG
HC
20.71
15.75
11. 12
11.02
9.36
6. 14
3.85
1.92
15. 11
12.01
4.22
12.60
9.07
7.64
6.00
CO
33.2
25.0
22.7
22. 2
22.8
23.3
21. 2
14. 5
28.4
29. 1
22. 5
42. 5
35.4
33. 2
30.5
COz
3073
3101
3120
3121
3125
3134
3145
3161
3098
3107
3141
3084
3106
3114
3123
NOX
17. 07
15.42
15. 29
16. 13
16.29
20.09
25.91
52.92
27.34
33.80
29. 23
27.00
28.71
25.85
37.85
FULL LOAD
HC
18.98
15. 50
11. 12
10. 64
8.73
5.36
3.30
1.36
11.88
10.47
3.31
11.45
8.76
7. 12
5.57
CO
31. 5
25.0
22.7
22.3
22.8
21. 7
17.5
19. 1
29.4
31.7
19.3
43.0
34. 1
33.3
33.3
- 33340 KG
coz
3081
3102
3120
3122
3127
3139
3152
3156
3107
3108
3149
3087
3109
3115
3120
NOX
15. 04
15. 26
14.70
15.50
17. 14
21. 27
29.96
69.82
35. 20
45. 84
35.30
30. 17
32.46
35.31
42.60
-------
a
LO
APPENDIX D-7 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 25-8. TRUCK 025 ALTERNATE DRIVING CYCLE SUMMARY
1975 IHC TTDIE 14.01 Litre 1-6 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD - 1
HC
10. 17
5. 94
4. 46
3.47
1.54
1. 61
1. 86
1.92
CO
25. 1
15. 7
15.4
11. 0
3.8
4.3
6.5
6. 1
co2
2070
1559
1087
1332
312
423
454
736
113 KG
NOX
13.94
12.43
9.79
11.99
2. 10
3.37
4. 09
6. 62
Fuel
79. 6*
59. 6*
41. 8*
50.6*
101. 30
136.35
147.43
235. 51
HALF LOAD -
HC CO CO2
Grams /Kilometre
9.42 29. 1 2300
5.81 23.9 1575
4.56 20.2 1811
3. 39 13. 1 1646
Grams /Minute
1.49 4.6 363
1.56 6.4 423
1.87 8.3 743
1.90 7.3 923
22226 KG
NOx
19.50
15. 23
19.02
19.03
3. 08
4.09
7.81
10.67
Fuel
88. 3*
60.6*
69. 1*
62.4*
117. 60
137. 18
238. 96
294. 84
FULL LOAD - 33340 KG
HC
10.09
6. 01
4. 89
3.39
1.46
1.59
1.92
1. 80
CO
37.9
25.9
22.6
16.2
5.5
6.8
8. 8
8.6
C02
2722
2238
2108
1892
394
592
826
1008
NOX
26.60
28. 24
25. 74
24. 63
3.85
7.46
10. 09
13. 12
Fuel
104. 6*
85.4*
80.3*
71.7*
127.68
190.39
265. 13 i
322. 03
Grams/Kilogram of Fuel
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
15. 15
11. 83
12. 64
8. 14
37.4
31.3
43. 8
25. 7
3084
3104
3082
3124
20.77
24.75
27.76
28. 12
12. 65 39. 1 3089
11.36 46.7 3081
7.83 34.7 3111
6.44 24.9 3131
26. 19
29.79
32.69
36. 19
11.45
8. 34
7. 23
5. 60
43. 0
36. 0
33.3
26.7
3087
3107
3115
3131
30. 17
39. 21
38. 05
40.75
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
OJ
00
TABLE 26-1.
1974 Ford TTDIE
APPENDK D-8
TRUCK 026 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
6.98 Litre 1-6 GVW 22589 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD - 7258 KG
HC
4. 23
2.46
2. 01
1.56
0.94
0.93
0.91
1.02
0.88
0.82
3.03
2.04
1. 54
1.50
CO
17. 1
9.5
7.6
5.2
4.0
2.8
2. 1
1.4
1.2
0.8
7.7
9. 1
6.7
8.0
CO2
2132
1333
1110
894
720
824
973
949
771
833
1470
1214
1029
1059
NOX
16. 65
10.45
8.70
7.40
7. 21
8.80
16.49
10.01
9.04
9.52
19.58
15.75
13. 17
14.77
Fuel*
80.8
50.4
42. 0
33.7
27. 1
30.9
36.4
32.7
26.6
28.7
51. 1
42.3
35.8
36.9
HALF LOAD - 14515 KG
HC
5.66
3.27
2. 68
1.95
1. 19
1. 09
1.30
1.65
1.29
1. 15
3.32
2. 19
1. 72
1.56
CO
7.8
4.3
3.3
2.8
1. 5
0.9
3.3
2.5
1.9
1. 0
13.4
11.6
9.9
14.4
C02
2112
1330
1138
917
774
925
1181
1131
805
892
1593
1329
1233
1198
NOX
16.39
11. 19
8.86
7.59
7.82
10. 62
24.97
13.90
11.00
10.68
20. 16
18. 19
16.53
18.36
Fuel*
79.7
50. 1
42.8
34. 5
29.0
34.6
44.3
39. 1
27.8
30.7
55.7
46.4
43. 0
42.0
FULL LOAD - 21773 KG
HC
5.38
3.08
2.46
1.83
1. 13
1.09
1.24
1.97
1. 24
1. 19
3.41
2.38
1.85
1.66
CO
15.4
8.8
6.5
4.9
2.3
2.2
21.6
20.0
13.6
3.2
22.3
18.7
20.3
25.4
C02
2111
1348
1120
945
833
1008
1412
1581
1011
1011
1837
1549
1428
1420
NOX
15.38
10.04
8.07
7. 60
8. 18
11.87
30.05
22.33
16. 16
13. 10
26. 11
22.68
21. 18
23.55
Fuel*
80.0
51.0
42.3
35.7
31.2
37.7
53.9
55.5
35.5
34.9
64.5
54.3
50.2
50.2
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
APPENDIX D-8 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 26-2. TRUCK 026 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1974 Ford TTDIE 6. 98 Litre 1-6 GVW 22589 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
13-FTP
13-FTP
EMPTY
HC
0. 15
0.55
0.63
0.79
0.82
0.75
0.98
1.33
0.54
0.70
0.87
0.43
0.57
0.61
0. 80
CO
0. 2
2. 2
2.4
3. 0
2. 7
3. 2
3. 0
3. 1
0.8
1.0
0.9
1. 1
2.5
2.7
4.3
LOAD -
CO2
65
274
343
438
467
574
869
1425
498
614
889
208
338
409
565
- 7258 KG
NOx
1. 10
2. 14
2.69
3.43
3.87
5. 75
9. 28
24. 15
5. 25
7. 21
10. 15
2.77
4.39
5. 23
7.88
Fuel*
20. 60
87.67
109.36
139.43
148. 65
182. 10
274. 80
449. 54
157.04
193.75
279. 89
66. 18
107. 90
130. 09
180. 09
HALF LOAD - 14515 KG
HC
0. 17
0.73
0.87
1. 04
1.04
0.95
1. 15
1.89
0. 87
1.03
1. 24
0.48
0.63
0.71
0.83
0.95
1. 12
CO
0.3
1. 0
1. 1
1.3
1. 5
1. 2
0.9
4.7
1.3
1.5
1. 1
1.9
3.3
4. 1
7.7
8.8
8.6
CO2
66
272
353
439
487
617
982
1720
596
645
963
229
382
510
641
878
880
NOX
1.08
2. 11
2.97
3.42
4.03
6. 23
11. 27
36.36
7.33
8.82
11.53
2. 90
5.22
6.83
9.82
14.34
13.99
Fuel*
21.09
86.44
112. 10
139.34
154.45
194.82
309. 52
543.38
188.47
204. 00
303.68
73. 20
121.93
162.52
205.45
277.01
277.01
FULL LOAD - 21773 KG
HC
0. 17
0.74
0.79
0.95
0.96
0.90
1. 15
1. 81
1.07
1. 01
1.32
0.48
0.66
0.73
0.87
CO
0.5
2. 1
2. 3
2. 5
2.5
1.8
2. 3
31.4
10.8
11.2
3.6
3. 1
5.2
8. 1
13.3
CO2
66
289
347
432
494
663
1062
2056
858
830
1116
257
431
566
744
NOX
1. 05
2. 10
2.59
3. 12
3. 98
6.52
12. 51
43. 75
12. 12
13. 26
14.46
3.66
6.31
8.40
12. 34
Fuel*
21.08
92. 25
110. 67
137. 69
157. 16
209. 64
335. 16
661. 68
275. 29
266.53
352. 84
82. 67
138.41
182. 15
240.52
*Fuel Consumption in Grams/Minute
13-FTP - 13-Mode Federal Test Procedure
-------
APPENDIX D-8 (Cont'd.)
TABLE Z6-3. TRUCK 026 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1974 Ford TTDIE 6. 98 Litre 1-6 GVW 22589 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
? 20±5
£ 30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD - 7258
HC
7.41
6. 22
5.79
5.67
5.48
4.09
3.56
2.96
3.41
3. 62
3. 12
6.47
5. 28
4. 71
4.46
CO
10.8
25. 2
22.3
21.4
18.4
17.6
10.9
6.8
4.8
5.0
3. 1
16.5
23.5
20.5
23.8
coz
3150
3131
3137
3139
3144
3150
3162
3170
3172
3171
3175
3144
3137
3143
3139
KG
NOX
53. 19
24.45
24.59
24.61
26.03
31.55
33.76
53.72
33.45
37. 19
36.27
41.89
40.70
40.23
43.78
HALF LOAD - 14515 KG
HC
8.26
8.43
7.74
7.43
6.71
4.88
3.73
3.48
4.62
5.06
4.09
6.53
5. 16
4.38
4.06
CO
16.2
11.6
10.3
9.2
9.6
6.2
3.0
8.7
7.0
7. 5
3.5
26.2
27.3
25.2
37.4
C02
3139
3145
3150
3152
3154
3165
3174
3165
3165
3162
3172
3128
3131
3137
3119
NOX
51. 13
24.40
26.50
24.56
26. 10
31.97
36.42
66.91
38. 87
43.24
37.97
39.59
42. 85
42.05
47.81
FULL LOAD
HC
8. 23
7.97
7. 16
6.90
6.09
4. 28
3.43
2.74
3.89
3.81
3.73
5.79
4.79
4.03
3.62
CO
21.6
22.9
20.5
18.3
16.2
8.8
7.0
47.4
39.4
41.9
10. 1
37.8
37.7
44. 2
55.2
- 21773 KG
CO2
3130
3129
3135
3140
3146
3163
3168
3107
3116
3112
3163
3113
3116
3108
3092
NOX
49. 88
22. 80
23. 36
22. 63
25. 30
31. 08
37.34
66. 12
44. 01
49.76
40.98
44. 24
45. 62
46.09
51. 29
-------
TABLE 26-4.
1974 Ford TTDIE
APPENDIX D-8 (Cont'd.)
TRUCK 026 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
6.98 Litre 1-6 GVW 22589 KG Project 11-4 133
EMPTY LOAD - 7258 KG
HALF LOAD- 14515 KG
FULL LOAD- 21773 KG
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
81
82
86
91
92
93
94
Rack,
RPM
480
1360
1500
1600
1640
1600
1840
1920
Period
24.0
38. 0
70. 0
%
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
5.
16.
38.
0
0
0
0
1
6
7
9
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
51
52
56
61
62
63
64
Rack,
RPM
480
1360
1520
1680
1640
1600
1840
1920
Period
24. 0
38.0
70.0
%
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
7.
21.
48.
0
0
0
0
6
8
6
8
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
21
22
26
31
32
33
34
RPM
480
1400
1500
1680
1600
1600
1840
1920
Period
24. 0
38.0
70.0
Rack,
%
0.0
0.0
0. 2
0.2
0.6
10.0
23.9
62.7
-------
TABLE 27-1.
1972 IHC TTDIF
APPENDIX D-9
TRUCK 027 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
14.80 Litre V-8 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4 133
Test
Dose.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
8.21
14. 15
11.80
7.35
2.21
1.93
1.85
4.84
4.68
1.99
8.45
5.38
4.09
3.39
CO
12.2
14.6
11.8
8.0
3. 1
2.8
2.9
5.3
5.2
3.0
16.0
13.4
7.7
10.7
C02
1979
2042
1729
1385
839
915
1061
895
1012
919
1876
1367
1160
1163
11113 KG
NOX
11.91
11. 18
10. 17
8.76
6.99
8.71
15. 12
9.78
9.81
9.57
17.49
14.81
12.52
13.82
Fuel*
75.3
78.4
66.4
52.8
31.6
34.4
39.8
34.2
38.5
34. 6
71.7
52.2
44. 1
44.3
HALF LOAD -
HC
11. 20
12.40
9.41
6.31
1.76
1.77
1.61
5.39
5. 09
2.09
8.00
5. 18
4. 24
3.01
CO
13.9
12. 5
8.4
5.5
2.2
2. 2
8.7
5.9
8.0
3. 1
24. 1
22.4
21.5
25.9
C02
2091
2109
1706
1306
901
1082
1389
1123
1204
1103
2167
1713
1594
1560
22226 KG
NOX
12. 11
11.67
10. 27
8.93
7.89
11.93
23. 15
15.85
14.79
13.96
22.88
20.74
21.54
20.69
Fuel*
79.9
80.6
65. 0
51. 6
33.8
40. 6
52.4
42.7
45.8
41.5
82.9
65.6
61.0
59.9
FULL LOAD -
HC
9.81
11.48
9.50
6. 19
1.71
2.04
0.38
5. 17
3.65
1.88
10.58
5.43
3.83
2.56
CO
13.7
13. 1
8.5
5.5
2.4
2.6
39.0
26.6
21. 1
11.0
38.4
35.7
39.9
40.8
C02
2122
1985
1754
1437
1003
1279
1837
1539
1552
1406
2616
1988
1945
1907
33340 KG
NOX
12. 76
11.20
10.85
9.81
10. 24
16.97
25.97
22.83
20.69
19.71
28.99
25.82
25. 57
23.21
Fuel*
80.9
75.9
66.8
54. 5
37.6
48. 0
70. 6
59.4
59.4
53. 1
100.8
76.7
75. 1
73.6
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX-±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
APPENDIX D-9 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 27-2. TRUCK 027 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1972 IHC TTDIE 14. 80 Litre V-8 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4 133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
& 20±5
ft 30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
13-FTP
13-FTP
EMPTY LOAD - 11113 KG
HC
0.31
1. 06
3.76
4.65
3.90
1.75
2.05
2.68
2. 68
3.92
2.22
1. 25
1.58
1. 64
1.83
CO
0.6
1.6
3.9
4.7
4. 2
2.4
3. 0
4. 2
3. 0
4. 4
3.4
2. 4
3.9
3. 1
5.8
CO2
101
255
542
682
735
661
972
1536
495
847
1023
277
401
466
629
NOx
0.68
1.53
2.97
4. 01
4. 65
5.51
9. 25
21.89
5.41
8.21
10.66
2.58
4. 34
5. 04
7.48
Fuel*
32.41
81. 67
175. 50
220. 56
236.44
210. 14
308. 02
486.31
159. 24
271.48
324. 64
89.26
129. 20
149.35
201. 89
HALF LOAD - 22226 KG
HC
0.33
1. 53
3.39
3.79
3.35
1.40
1.88
2.35
2.93
4. 20
2.30
1.20
1.43
1.78
1.68
1.38
1.38
CO
0.6
1.9
3.4
3.4
2.9
1. 7
2.3
12.8
3. 2
6.6
3.4
3.6
6. 2
9.0
14.5
12.76
12.75
CO2
92
286
577
686
722
718
1 149
2034
610
993
1214
324
472
668
872
1175
1176
NOX
0.60
1.66
3. 19
4. 13
4.74
6. 28
12.67
33.89
8.62
12. 19
15. 35
3.43
5.71
9.03
11.57
17. 19
16.98
Fuel*
29.61
92.09
185. 85
220. 51
231.03
227. 16
363.31
646.32
195.78
318.52
384. 34
104.65
152.32
215.64
282.26
400. 10
400. 10
FULL LOAD - 33340 KG
HC
0. 31
1.42
3. 05
3.82
3.34
1. 35
2. 18
0. 52
2. 80
3. 02
2.09
1.60
1. 57
1.61
1. 41
CO
0.6
2. 0
3. 5
3. 4
3.0
1.9
2.8
53.9
14.4
17.4
12.3
5.8
10. 3
16.7
22.5
co2
96
307
527
706
774
791
1369
2541
834
1285
1567
397
574
817
1052
NOX
0. 61
1.85
2.97
4.37
5. 29
8.08
18. 15
35. 93
12.37
17. 12
21.97
4.40
7.46
10. 74
12. 80
Fuel*
30. 58
98.68
169. 86
226. 64
247. 53
250. 08
432. 64
823. 71
271.35
414. 28
499. 26
128. 82
186. 57
265.96
342. 20
*Fuel Consumption in Grams/Minute
13-FTP - 13-Mode Federal Test Procedure
-------
APPENDIX D-9 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 27-3. TRUCK 027 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1972 IHC TTDIE 14.80 Litre V-8 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
_, 40 SS
? 55 SS
•(>•
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD - 11]
HC
9.63
12.94
21.40
21.08
16. 50
8.31
6.66
5. 52
16.80
14.42
6.83
13.98
12.21
11.01
9.09
CO
19.9
19.3
22. 1
21. 1
17.9
11.5
9.7
8.7
18.5
16.0
10.4
26.6
30.3
20.7
28.7
co2
3129
3119
3088
3091
3 110
3146
3154
3159
3108
3120
3152
3105
3104
3123
3117
113 KG
NOX
20.89
18.77
16.91
18. 17
19.63
26. 24
30.02
45. 02
33.95
30.24
32.85
28.95
33.63
33.72
37.03
HALF LOAD - 22226 KG
HC
11.27
16.64
18.25
17. 17
14.51
6. 18
5. 18
3.64
14.98
13. 17
5.99
11.44
9.36
8.24
5.96
CO
20. 6
20.7
18. 5
15.4
12.7
7.5
6.5
19.7
16.3
20.7
8.8
34.4
40.5
41.8
51.4
CO2
3122
3106
3104
3112
3125
3159
3164
3148
3118
3116
3157
3100
3097
3099
3091
NOX
20. 14
17.98
17. 17
18. 74
20. 53
27. 67
34. 88
52.44
44. 01
38. 27
39.95
32.73
37.49
41.88
40.99
FULL LOAD
HC
10. 27
14. 40
17.94
16. 85
13.48
5. 40
5. 03
0. 63
10. 32
7. 30
4. 19
12.45
8. 39
6. 05
4. 12
CO
19.9
20. 2
20.4
15. 1
12. 1
7. 5
6.4
65.4
53. 1
42. 1
34.6
45. 3
55.2
63. 0
65.8
- 33340
CO2
3127
3113
3102
3114
3129
3161
3164
3085
3074
3101
3138
3080
3077
3072
3074
KG
NOX
19. 80
18. 73
17.50
19. 27
21.36
32. 29
41. 96
43.62
45. 60
41.34
44. 00
34. 13
39.96
40. 39
37.40
-------
TABLE 27-4.
1972 IHC TTDIE
APPENDIX D-9 (Cont'd.)
TRUCK 027 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
14.80 Litre V-8 GVW 34700 KG Project 11-4133
EMPTY LOAD- 111 13 KG
HALF LOAD - 22226 KG
FULL LOAD - 33340 KG
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVGo
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
81
82
86
91
92
93
94
Rail,
RPM
640
1500
2200
2400
2400
1920
2200
2280
Period
32. 0
42.0
60.0
psi
2.
6.
14.
18.
19.
17.
30.
64.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
51
52
56
61
62
63
64
Rail,
RPM
640
1500
2200
2400
2400
1920
2200
psi
2.
6.
14.
18.
20.
20.
40.
2300 107.
Period
32.0
42.0
60.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
21
22
26
31
32
33
34
RPM
640
1500
2100
2400
2400
1920
2240
2200
Period
32.0
42. 0
60.0
Rail,
psi
2.0
6.0
13.0
20.0
20.0
24. 0
52.0
158.0
-------
TABLE 28-1.
1967 Dodge D3DIE
APPENDIX D-10
TRUCK 028 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
12. 18 Litre 1-6 GVW 18824 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
o 55 SS
*•
o 20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD
HC
7.41
6. 13
3.56
3.28
1.84
1.84
1.07
3.34
2. 11
1.57
8.65
5.55
4.03
3.06
CO
25.4
18.6
11. 1
9.5
5.4
5.5
6.7
11.2
6.7
4.6
27.3
26.0
23.0
14. 1
C02
2355
1909
1144
1000
680
663
686
1060
698
648
2031
1356
1066
960
- 7258 KG
NOX
17.80
13. 64
8. 17
6.93
5.47
5.38
6.35
8.91
6.67
6. 02
17.32
11.39
9.88
8.09
Fuel*
89.9
72.8
43.6
38. 1
25.8
25. 2
26.0
40. 6
26.7
24.7
78.5
52.8
41.6
37.0
HC
8. 70
6. 70
4.28
3.43
1.92
1. 24
1. 51
3.50
2.48
1.45
7.59
4.98
3.87
2.98
HALF
CO
26. 7
20.4
11.9
9.9
6. 2
6. 1
16.5
12.6
9.0
6. 1
24.3
28. 2
29. 0
16.9
LOAD
C02
2476
1945
1184
988
712
725
874
1065
741
702
1801
1510
1192
1027
- 11113 KG
NOX
19. 17
13. 12
8.63
7.45
6. 15
6.77
9. 81
8.37
6.80
6.44
14. 88
13.63
11.53
9.25
Fuel*
94. 6
74.3
45. 2
37. 7
27. 1
27. 5
33.6
40.9
28.5
26.8
69. 6
58.6
46. 7
39.7
FULL LOAD - 18371 KG
HC
8.09
6.60
4.30
3.56
1.65
1.33
0. 61
3. 89
2.69
1.68
8. 13
5. 54
3.34
3. 17
CO
24.3
22.9
14.5
11.7
6.8
9.8
51.6
16.8
19.4
10.8
38.0
42.9
48.6
36.0
C02
2194
1946
1184
1061
796
889
1197
1143
877
877
2209
1817
1625
1403
NOX
16.50
13. 17
9.33
8.31
7.49
9.82
14.78
9.61
9.45
9. 14
19.39
16.96
16.82
13.23
Fuel*
83.9
74. 5
45.4
40.5
30.2
33.8
47.6
44. 1
34.2
33.6
85.7
71.0
63.9
54.9
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
o
APPENDIX D-10 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 28-2. TRUCK 028 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1967 Dodge D3DIE 12. 8 Litre 1-6 GVW 18824 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
13-FTP
13-FTP
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
0.38
1.01
1.58
1.40
1. 74
1.48
1.97
1.58
1.82
1. 72
1.71
1. 27
1.50
1.69
1.71
CO
0.9
3. 5
4.8
4.4
5. 1
4. 3
5.9
9.9
6. 1
5. 5
5. 0
4. 0
7. 0
9.6
7.9
co2
95
322
492
451
531
547
710
1015
576
568
707
299
367
447
536
7258 KG
NOX
1. 13
2.43
3.51
3.22
3.68
4.40
5.76
9.40
4.84
5.43
6.57
2.55
3. 08
4. 15
4.51
Fuel*
30.58
103. 68
157.98
144. 86
170. 70
174.96
227. 26
324. 66
185.47
182.46
225. 77
96. 86
119.93
146.66
173.49
HALF LOAD - 1
HC
0.39
1. 19
1.83
1.72
1.85
1.55
1.32
2.23
1.83
1.99
1.57
1. 08
1.31
1.55
1.61
1. 11
1.06
CO
1.0
3. 7
5. 6
4.8
5. 3
4.9
6.5
24.4
6.6
7. 2
6.6
3. 5
7.4
11.6
9. 1
15.3
15. 1
CO?
92
339
532
476
533
573
776
1293
556
595
762
257
396
479
554
696
714
1113 KG
NOX
1. 11
2.62
3.59
3.47
4. 02
4.95
7. 25
14. 52
4.37
5.47
6.98
2. 12
3. 57
4.63
4.99
8.31
8.27
FULL LOAD - 18371 KG
Fuel*
29.57
109. 10
171.31
153.33
171.39
183.46
247.76
419. 52
179.30
192. 13
243.74
83. 19
128. 99
157.47
179.79
233. 17
233. 17
HC
0.38
1. 04
1. 75
1.73
1. 89
1. 34
1. 42
0.84
2.07
2. 16
1.81
1. 18
1.52
1.36
1.78
CO
1. 0
3. 1
6. 1
5.8
6. 2
5.6
10.4
71. 5
9.0
15.6
11.6
5.5
11.8
19.8
20. 2
C02
87
282
517
476
563
647
951
1656
608
704
945
320
499
664
788
NOX
0.93
2. 12
3. 50
3. 75
4.41
6.09
10. 51
20.46
5. 11
7.58
9. 85
2. 81
4. 66
6.87
7.43
Fuel*
28. 25
91. 08
166. 67
153.87
181.46
206. 74
304. 73
555. 11
196.88
230.38
303.85
104. 07
163. 88
219. 10
258. 70
*Fuel Consumption in Grams /Minute
13-FTP - 13-Mode Federal Test Procedure
-------
d
APPENDIX D-10 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 28-3. TRUCK 028 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1967 Dodge D3DIE 12. 18 Litre 1-6 GVW 18824 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD - 7258
HC
12.38
9.77
9.99
9.68
10. 20
8.46
8.68
4.88
9.80
9.42
7.59
13. 13
12.51
11.54
9.86
CO
28.0
33.6
30. 2
30.2
29.7
24.7
25.8
30.6
32.7
30.0
22.3
41.5
58.6
65.8
45.4
coz
3107
3107
3111
3112
3112
3125
3122
3127
3108
3113
3131
3084
3059
3051
3088
KG
NOX
37.00
23.48
22.23
22.24
21.54
25. 16
25.34
28.94
26. 12
29.75
29.09
26.29
25.69
28.28
26.02
HALF LOAD - 11113 KG
HC
13. 29
10.91
10.70
11. 22
10.80
8.42
5.35
5.32
10. 19
10.38
6.44
12.99
10. 13
9.87
8.95
CO
32.5
33.5
32. 5
31. 2
31. 1
27.0
26.4
58. 1
36.7
37.7
27.0
41.7
57.4
74.0
50.9
co2
3097
3103
3105
3106
3107
3121
3132
3082
3101
3098
3127
3084
3068
3043
3082
NOX
37.70
24. 03
20.96
22. 63
23.44
26.98
29. 26
34.61
24.36
28.46
28.65
25.48
27.71
29.43
27.78
FULL LOAD - 18371
HC
13. 52
11.44
10. 51
11. 24
10.41
6.48
4. 67
1. 52
10.50
9.38
5.96
11.30
9.29
6. 22
6.87
CO
34.6
34.4
36.6
37.8
34.4
26.9
34. 2
128.7
45.5
67.6
38. 2
52.9
72.0
90.5
78. 1
C02
3093
3100
3100
3095
3103
3127
3122
2983
3086
3054
3111
3072
3048
3028
3046
KG
NOX
32. 74
23.32
20.98
24.39
24.33
29.44
34.49
36.85
25.94
32.92
32.42
26.96
28.45
31.34
28.73
-------
TABLE 28-4.
1967 Dodge D3DIE
APPENDIX D-10 (Cont'd.)
TRUCK 028 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
12. 18 Litre 1-6 GVW 18824 KG Project 11-4133
EMPTY LOAD - 7258 KG
HALF LOAD- 11113 KG
FULL LOAD- 18371 KG
d
vO
Test
De sc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
Rail,
RPM
680
1640
2000
1880
I960
1800
1840
2000
psi
4.
13.
20.
19.
21.
23.
32.
56.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Period
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
81
82
86
91
92
93
94
42.
54.
120.
0
0
0
51
52
56
61
62
63
64
Rail,
RPM
680
1680
2100
1920
2000
1760
1840
2000
psi
4.
13.
23.
20.
23.
25.
38.
80.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Period
42.
54.
120.
0
0
0
21
22
26
31
32
33
34
RPM
680
1600
2040
1920
I960
1800
1840
1900
Rail,
psi
4.0
11. 0
20.0
20.0
24.0
30. 0
50. 0
120.0
Period
42.
54.
120.
0
0
0
-------
d
TABLE 29-1.
1975IHC D2DIE
APPENDIX D-ll
TRUCK 029 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
9.39 Litre V-8 GVW 11413 KG Project 11-4133
Tost
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
Z0±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY
HC
15. 23
9. 00
7.38
5.42
3.27
2. 49
1.65
4.27
3.04
2.64
6.80
4. 42
3.43
2. 23
CO
30. 1
17.7
13. 7
10.8
6.5
4.8
2. 6
5.9
4.4
4.0
11.3
7.3
5.9
4. 1
LOAD -
CO2
1580
1025
886
742
619
685
769
825
657
699
1160
983
916
888
7258 KG
NOX
11. 13
7.70
6.56
6.07
5.80
6.68
8. 24
8. 17
6.97
7.61
10.25
9. 16
8.65
8.74
Fuel*
62.3
40. 2
34.6
28.9
23.8
26.0
28.9
31.5
25.0
26.6
44.6
37.5
34.8
33.5
HALF LOAD - 9299 KG
HC
14.73
8.77
7. 18
5.29
3.09
2. 34
1.44
2.85
2. 53
2.28
6.66
4. 20
3.33
1.98
CO
26. 1
16. 5
13.5
10.0
5.8
3. 7
1.9
5.8
4. 7
4.4
12.8
8.0
7.0
4. 1
C02
1635
1039
894
735
640
721
853
898
709
748
1220
1065
996
974
NOX
12. 28
8.25
7. 16
6.44
6.40
7. 51
9. 24
8.86
7.32
7. 72
12.04
10.81
10. 17
10. 13
Fuel*
64. 1
40. 6
34.9
28.5
24.5
27.3
32. 0
34. 1
26.9
28.3
46.9
40. 6
37.9
36.7
FULL LOAD - 11
HC
16.32
9. 28
7.48
5.59
3.27
2. 25
0.99
2.31
2.53
2.56
6.56
4.66
3.55
2.02
CO
29.2
17. 0
12.8
10.2
5.3
3.5
1.4
4.3
3.9
4. 2
11.8
8.6
7.9
3.4
C02
1767
1074
917
770
679
751
941
960
726
771
1225
1115
995
945
113 KG
NOX
12.67
8.44
7. 13
6.53
6.54
7. 60
9. 58
9.54
7.66
8.36
11.93
11. 26
10.22
9.95
Fuel*
69.3
42.0
35.7
29.9
25.9
28.4
35. 2
36.2
27.5
29.2
47.0
42. 5
37.9
35.6
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
APPENDIX D-ll (Cont'd.)
TABLE 29-2. TRUCK 029 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1975 IHC D2DIE 9. 39 Litre V-8 GVW 11413 KG Project 11-4 133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
13-FTP
13-FTP
EMPTY
HC
0.55
2. 08
2.39
2.91
2.83
2. 63
2. 67
2.43
2.29
2.47
2. 87
1.02
1. 12
1.36
1. 20
CO
1. 1
4. 1
4. 7
5.4
5.7
5. 2
5. 1
3. 8
3. 2
3.5
4.4
1. 7
1.8
2.4
2.2
LOAD
coz
58
216
272
349
388
498
732
1132
442
534
760
174
248
364
481
- 7258 KG
NOX
0.58
1.52
2. 04
2.58
3. 17
4.66
7. 14
12. 14
4.38
5.66
8.27
1.53
2.31
3.44
4.73
Fuel*
19. 24
71. 79
89.96
115. 04
127. 23
161. 25
234.75
359. 12
142.46
171.59
243. 19
56. 24
79.84
116. 74
153.03
HALF LOAD - 9299 KG
HC
0. 50
i.'go
2.33
2.83
2. 76
2.48
2.49
2. 12
1.57
2.07
2.52
1.00
1. 14
1.31
1. 08
2.48
2.48
CO
0.7
3. 4
4. 4
5.3
5. 2
4. 7
4. 0
2. 8
3. 2
3.8
4.8
1.9
2.2
2.7
2. 2
4. 0
4. 2
C02
62
210
276
352
384
515
766
1255
494
581
826
184
289
392
531
641
641
NOX
0.65
1.58
2. 19
2. 82
3. 37
5. 15
7.98
13. 60
4.87
6.01
8.52
1.81
2.93
4. 00
5.53
5.83
5.80
Fuel*
20. 17
69. 50
90.90
115. 86
125.72
166. 21
244. 50
396. 91
158.00
186. 16
263.74
59.59
92. 81
125.59
168.71
208.98
208. 98
FULL LOAD - 1
HC
0.55
2. 10
2.39
3.01
2.97
2.63
2.39
1. 44
1. 23
2. 05
2.76
1.01
1. 27
1. 42
1.08
CO
0.9
3.8
4.4
5. 2
5.4
4.3
3.8
2. 0
2.3
3. 1
4.6
1.8
2.3
3. 2
1.8
C02
65
227
276
369
409
546
798
1370
513
588
832
188
304
398
505
1113 KG
NOX
0.65
1. 63
2. 17
2.87
3.47
5. 26
8.07
13.95
5. 10
6. 20
9. 02
1.83
3.07
4.08
5.31
Fuel*
21. 24
75. 22
91. 17
121.09
133. 69
175. 89
254. 21
431.97
163. 28
187. 82
265. 62
60. 88
97. 82
127. 57
160. 15
*Fuel Consumption in Grams /Minute
13-FTP - 13-Mode Federal Test Procedure
-------
APPENDIX D-ll (Cont'd.)
TABLE 29-3. TRUCK 029 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1975 1HC D2DIE 9.39 Litre V-8 GVW 11413 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD - 7258
HC
28.48
29.01
26.56
25.30
22.27
16.30
11.36
6.76
16.06
14.38
11.81
18. 08
13.99
11.68
7.87
CO
54.7
57.3
52.2
46.9
44.5
32. 2
21.8
10.6
22.2
20.6
18.0
30. 1
23. 0
20.3
14.4
CO2
3015
3009
3025
3037
3050
3088
3120
3152
3105
3113
3125
3086
3110
3122
3143
KG
NOX
29.92
21. 21
22.72
22.46
24.95
28.93
30.43
33.80
30.74
33.00
34.01
27.28
28.98
29.48
30.93
HALF LOAD - 9299
HC
24.94
27. 28
25.61
24.44
21.99
14.95
10. 18
5.33
9.92
11. 15
9.54
16.84
12.28
10.44
6.39
CO
34.2
48.3
48.3
45.8
41.4
28.0
16.2
7. 1
20. 1
20.5
18.4
32.5
23.3
21.8
13.2
C02
3058
3029
3034
3042
3056
3099
3133
3162
3127
3123
3131
3086
3115
3123
3149
KG
NOX
32.33
22. 74
24. 10
24. 36
26.80
30.98
32. 62
34. 27
30.85
32. 28
32.32
30.44
31. 61
31.86
32.75
FULL LOAD - 11113
HC
25. 89
27.93
26. 21
24.84
22. 20
14.97
9.40
3.32
7.56
10. 90
10.40
16. 55
13.01
11. 13
6.72
CO
42.6
50.0
48. 1
42. 5
40. 6
24.4
14.8
4.6
14. 2
16.8
17. 2
29.7
23.9
24.8
11.3
CO2
3042
3024
3033
3045
3057
3105
3137
3172
3144
3130
3131
3092
3112
3116
3151
KG
NOy
30. 57
21. 68
23. 83
23. 67
25.93
29.89
31.73
32.30
31.23
33. 03
33.96
30. 10
31.42
32.00
33. 18
-------
APPENDIX D-ll (Cont'd.)
TABLE 29-4. TRUCK 029 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
1975 IHC D2DIE 9.39 Litre V-8 GVW 11413 KG Project 11-4133
EMPTY LOAD - 7258 KG
HALF LOAD - 9299 KG
FULL LOAD- 11113 KG
d
Ul
oo
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
Rack,
RPM
600
1700
1840
2040
2040
2000
2320
2320
%
0.
7.
11.
17.
17.
18.
27.
32.
0
8
1
5
8
0
8
2
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Period
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
81
82
86
91
92
93
94
19.
36.
60.
0
0
0
51
52
56
61
62
63
64
Rack,
RPM
600
1600
1840
2040
2040
2000
2300
2320
Period
19.0
36.0
60.0
%
0.
7.
11.
17.
17.
18.
27.
33.
0
2
7
2
2
3
2
3
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
21
22
26
31
32
33
34
RPM
600
1680
1840
2040
2040
2000
2300
2320
Period
19.0
36.0
60.0
Rack,
%
0.0
7.8
11. 1
17. 2
17. 2
18.3
27.2
100.0
-------
D
TABLE 30-1.
1975 IHC D3DIE
APPENDIX D-12
TRUCK 030 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
5. 21 Litre V-6 GVW 21682 KG Project 1 1-4 133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD -
HC
9. 42
4.89
3. 55
2.76
1.82
1.75
1. 38
2.31
1.75
1.63
4. 77
3. 09
2.26
2.00
CO
11. 5
6.7
4. 4
4. 0
2. 2
1.9
1. 1
2.8
2. 2
1.7
7.4
4. 2
4. 2
2.8
C0?
2132
1174
946
111
637
713
764
803
638
687
1354
1066
926
851
7258 KG
NOX
16. 12
9.21
7.42
6. 40
6. 17
7.91
11.89
11.90
8.95
9.51
14.97
12. 65
12. 21
10. 26
HALF LOAD - 1]
Fuel*
81. 1
44.6
35.9
29.5
24.0
26.8
28.7
30.3
24. 1
25.8
51.3
40.2
34.9
32.0
HC
8. 80
4.94
3. 62
2. 83
1.89
1.83
1. 53
1.93
1.76
1.74
4.78
3.23
2.44
2.05
CO
6.9
3.7
2. 2
2.3
1. 1
1.0
2.8
3.9
2.9
2. 5
5.8
7.8
7.9
2.8
co2
2063
1185
971
820
706
826
3160
886
722
788
1371
1135
1036
938
[113 KG
NOX
14.99
8. 94
6.90
6.42
6. 52
9.30
49. 64
11. 03
9.29
9. 83
15. 51
14. 20
14.60
11.98
FULL LOAD - 18371 KG
Fuel*
78. 2
44. 9
36.6
31. 0
26. 5
31. 0
37.0
33.4
27. 2
29.7
51.9
43. 0
39.3
35.3
HC
8.45
4. 57
3.55
2.78
1.79
1.83
1.79
2. 13
1.67
1.69
5.02
3.38
2.59
2. 15
CO
11. 2
5.9
3.5
2.0
1.8
1.5
12.9
9.6
5.2
1.7
16.8
10.9
13.5
7. 5
C02
2040
1175
996
820
723
880
1158
1125
773
817
1490
1326
1305
1133
NOX
15. 03
8. 61
7. 15
6.42
6.92
10.36
18.61
17. 04
11.92
10.87
17.46
17. 26
19.75
15.54
Fuel*
77.5
44.6
37.7
30.9
27.2
33.0
44. 0
40.7
29.2
30.7
57.0
50.3
49.6
42.8
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ±Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
o
I
Ul
Ul
APPENDIX D-12 (Cont'd. )
TABLE 30-2. TRUCK 030 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1975 IHC D3DIE 5. 21 Litre V-6 GVW 21682 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
13-FTP
13-FTP
EMPTY LOAD - 7258
HC
0. 28
1.36
1.34
1.43
1. 44
1.46
1.88
2. 03
1. 23
1.40
1.74
0. 67
0. 82
0.92
1. 10
CO
0.4
1.7
1.8
1. 8
2. 1
1. 8
2. 1
1. 6
1. 5
1. 7
1.8
1. 0
1. 1
1. 7
1. 5
C02
59
309
321
381
406
512
769
1125
427
510
730
189
284
377
467
NOX
0.87
2.33
2.52
2.98
3.35
4. 96
8.52
17.50
6.33
7. 15
10. 12
2.09
3.37
4.97
5.63
KG
HALF LOAD - 1
Fuel*
18.
98.
102.
121.
129.
162.
243.
355.
135.
161.
231.
60.
90.
119.
148.
93
93
86
60
85
95
79
55
83
97
51
38
30
80
11
HC
0. 28
1. 20
1.31
1.46
1.50
1.54
1.96
2.26
1.07
1.45
1.92
0. 67
0.84
0. 96
1.09
1.58
1.55
CO
0.4
0.9
1. 0
0.9
1.2
0.9
1.0
4. 1
2. 2
2. 4
2. 8
0.8
2.0
3. 1
1. 5
7. 5
6.8
C02
58
282
315
390
435
573
883
1449
493
596
866
191
297
410
500
836
837
1113 KG
NOX
0. 81
2. 05
2.37
2. 78
3.41
5. 30
9.95
22. 76
6. 13
7.66
10.80
2. 16
3. 72
5. 77
6.38
11. 10
11. 29
Fuel*
18.
90.
100.
124.
138.
181.
279.
458.
156.
189.
274.
60.
94.
130.
158.
260.
260.
81
09
42
25
53
65
32
54
52
30
84
88
89
91
47
39
39
FULL LOAD - 18371 KG
HC
0. 29
1. 22
1. 25
1.46
1.45
1.43
1.98
2.64
1.05
1.31
1. 77
0. 70
0.91
1.03
1. 13
CO
0.4
1.6
1.6
1.4
1. 1
1.4
1. 7
19.0
4.7
4. 1
1.8
2.4
2.9
5.4
3.9
C02
58
295
321
409
429
575
948
1705
554
605
856
209
357
518
597
NOX
0.
2.
2.
2.
3.
5.
11.
27.
8.
9.
11.
2.
4.
7.
8.
81
18
36
93
36
52
17
40
40
33
38
45
65
85
19
Fuel*
18.
94.
102.
130.
136.
182.
299.
546.
177.
192.
270.
67.
114.
166.
190.
82
62
74
21
30
49
99
37
15
96
94
35
23
18
25
*Fuel Consumption in Grams/Minute
13-FTP - 13-Mode Federal Test Procedure
-------
d
Ul
APPENDIX D-12 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 30-3. TRUCK 030 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1975 IHC D3DIE 5.21LitreV-6 GVW 21682 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD - 7258
HC
14.83
13. 79
13.01
11.74
11. 12
8.96
7.72
5.71
9.06
8.65
7.50
11.02
9. 12
7.66
7.40
CO
22.0
16.8
17.7
14.5
16.2
10.8
8.4
1.6
11.0
10.8
7.7
17.0
12.5
14.4
10.3
co2
3109
3121
3121
3131
3130
3145
3153
1125
3145
3146
3154
3129
3142
3144
3151
KG
NOX
45.74
23.59
24.50
24. 53
25. 79
30.44
34.96
17.50
46.62
44. 13
43.70
34.60
37.28
41.45
38.00
HALF LOAD
HC
14.83
13.35
13. 06
11. 72
10.86
8.46
7.02
4.93
6.85
7.68
6.97
10.93
8.90
7.36
6.88
CO
22. 0
10.5
9.7
7. 1
9.0
4.9
3. 7
9.0
13.9
12. 6
10. 1
13.2
21.6
23.8
9.5
- 11113
C02
3109
3132
3134
3142
3142
3156
3162
3160
3147
3146
3152
3135
3128
3130
3154
KG
NOX
43. 15
22.76
23. 62
22. 35
24. 61
29. 19
35. 61
49. 64
39. 16
40.48
39.30
35.49
39. 15
44.09
40. 26
FULL LOAD - 1837J
HC
15. 52
12.94
12. 17
11. 20
10. 66
7.83
6. 58
4.83
5.94
6. 78
6.52
10.46
7.97
6.19
5.96
CO
21.9
17. 1
15. 7
11. 1
7. 7
7.7
5. 5
34.7
26.7
21. 0
6.7
35. 0
25. 7
32.4
20.7
COZ
3107
3123
3 127
3138
3145
3154
3161
3120
3130
3136
3159
3102
3125
3120
3139
KG
NOX
43. 12
23.00
22.93
22. 54
24. 63
30. 22
37. 22
50. 15
47.39
48.36
42. 01
36.33
40. 69
47. 22
43.05
-------
APPENDIX D-12 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 30-4. TRUCK 030 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
1975 IHC D3DIE 5.21LitreV-6 GVW 21682 KG Project 11-4133
EMPTY LOAD-7258 KG
HA LF LOAD - 11113 KG
FULL LOAD- 18371 KG
d
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
55 SS
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
Rack,
RPM
520
1760
1760
1920
1840
1840
2160
2160
%
0
23.
23.
27.
28.
34.
47.
64.
9
9
2
9
4
7
9
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Period
20±5
30±5
40±2
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
81
82
86
91
92
93
94
27.
48.
84.
0
0
0
51
52
53
61
62
63
64
RPM
520
1600
1680
1920
1920
1840
2160
2160
Rack ,
%
0
23.3
24.4
26.6
28.9
36.6
51. 1
79.4
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Period
27.
48.
84.
0
0
0
21
22
23
31
32
33
34
Rack,
RPM
520
1680
1760
1920
1840
1840
2160
2200
0
y
21
23
27
31
38
54
97
\
0
.6
.9
.8
. 1
.9
.9
. 1
Period
27.
48.
84
0
0
0
-------
APPENDIX E
DIESEL BUS RESULTS
E-l Summarized Results of 1 City Bus
E-2 Summarized Results of 1 Intercity Bus
E-3 Modal Modified 13-Mode Results
-------
APPENDIX E-l
TABLE 31-1. BUS 031 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
1972 CMC City Bus Detroit Diesel 6V-71N GVW 13835 KG Project 11-4133
Ti-Bt
Desc .
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 ss
30 SS
40 SS
20±5
30±5
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD
HC
3.29
2.52
1.96
1.81
1.16
1.05
1.80
1.21
3.84
2.72
£.17
1.95
CO
4.8
3.4
3.2
3.9
2.2
1.6
3.3
2.8
10.5
22.6
16.3
11.3
COz
771
640
669
759
530
671
1030
597
1639
1492
1306
1161
- 9752 KG
NOX
13.62
10.66
10.00
10.99
8.01
9.87
14.83
9.08
25.45
21.20
19.34
17.90
Fuel*
30.8
25.5
26.5
30.0
26.4
26.4
42.6
24.8
68.2
62.9
54.8
48.5
HC
3.43
2.47
2.06
1. 78
1. 20
1.12
1.84
1.04
4.50
2.56
1.93
1.91
HALF LOAD -
CO
4.3
3.4
3.6
3.3
1.8
1.5
4.7
4.8
34.5
19.7
14.5
11.6
CO2
749
657
672
748
538
705
1086
600
2178
1388
1145
1150
11113 KG
NOX
13.89
10.86
10.42
11.00
8.12
10. 24
16.91
10.01
33.36
21.15
17.27
18.30
Fuel*
29.9
26.1
26.7
29.6
21. 2
27. 7
45.0
25.0
91.9
58.4
48.0
48. 1
FULL LOAD - 1
HC
3.08
2.41
1.92
1.67
1.07
1.08
1.94
1.00
4.41
2.64
1.95
1.87
CO
3.5
2. 7
2.1
1.9
1.1
0.7
6.8
7.5
30.5
16.6
11.6
9.3
CO 2
771
640
689
759
578
746
1259
717
2315
1599
1304
1230
3608 KG
NOX
13.62
10.66
10.23
10.62
8.17
10.33
20.07
10.79
34.86
24.64
20.12
19.62
Fuel*
30.6
25.4
27.2
29.9
22.7
29.2
52.2
29.9
97.2
66.8
54.4
51.2
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ± Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
APPENDIX E-l (Cont'd.)
TABLE 31-2. BUS 031 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1972 CMC City Bus Detroit Diesel 6V-71N GVW 13835 KG Project 11-41 33
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
20±5
30±5
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
13-FTP
13-FTP
EMPTY LOAD - 9752 KG
HC
0. 47
0.50
0.65
0. 77
0.96
0.93
1.11
0.98
0.98
0.57
0.74
0.85
1.02
CO
0.8
0. 7
0.9
1.3
2.1
1.8
1. 7
1.8
2.3
1.6
6.1
6.4
5.9
C02
91
118
165
264
403
427
713
561
482
243
405
513
606
NOX
1.56
2.08
2.74
3.94
5.84
6. 44
10.48
8.08
7.33
3.78
5.76
7.60
9.35
Fuel*
29.34
37. 78
52.66
83.99
128.17
135.37
225.26
177.52
153.15
77.50
130.66
164.62
193.83
HALF LOAD -
HC
0.47
0.52
0.65
0.85
0.96
0.98
1.18
0.97
0.82
0.60
0.69
0.77
0.97
1.43
1.36
CO
0. 7
0.7
0.9
1.5
1.8
1.5
1.6
2.5
3.8
4.6
5.3
5.8
5.8
4.9
4. 4
C02
94
114
175
276
403
437
744
572
474
292
375
455
582
761
766
• 11113 KG
NOX
1. 73
2. 12
2.88
4.27
5.93
6.60
10. 79
8.90
7.90
4.48
5.71
6. 87
9.26
12.07
11.66
Fuel*
30.
36.
55.
87.
128.
138.
234.
181.
151.
94.
120.
146.
186.
236.
236.
35
68
74
89
02
55
78
27
13
41
69
22
12
20
20
FULL LOAD - 13608 KG
HC
0. 46
0.47
0.62
0.79
0.89
0.86
1.14
1.02
0. 79
0.63
0.70
0. 76
0.95
CO
0.5
0.5
0. 7
0.8
1.0
0.9
0.8
3.5
5.9
4.3
4. 4
4.5
4.8
co2
90
118
165
282
403
465
786
659
567
328
425
507
628
NOX
1.59
2.08
2.74
4. 20
5.65
6.57
10.88
10.50
8.52
4.94
6.55
7.83
10.02
Fuel*
29.02
37.65
52.55
89.66
127.59
147.02
247.58
208.97
181.14
105.53
135.91
161.86
200.09
*Fuel Consumption in Grams /Minute
13-FTP - 13-Mode Federal Test Procedure
-------
M
TABLE 31-3.
1972 CMC City Bus
APPENDIX E-l (Cont'd.)
BUS 031 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
Detroit Diesel 6V-71N GVW 13835 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
20dt5
30±5
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD - 9752 KG
HC
15.90
13.32
12.33
9.19
7.48
6.87
4.93
5.53
6.41
7.35
5.65
5.16
5.25
CO
28.3
19.3
16.6
15.3
16.2
13.0
7.8
10.2
14.7
20.0
47.0
38.9
30.6
co2
3099
3121
3128
3140
3144
3151
3165
3160
3150
3139
3102
3116
3129
NOX
53.19
55.10
52.12
46.94
45.55
47.58
46.54
45.52
47.88
48.74
44.06
46.14
48.23
HALF LOAD - 11113 KG
HC
15.38
14.30
11.75
9.63
7.49
7.05
5.04
5.36
5.45
6.40
5.73
5.25
5.19
CO
22.8
18.1
16.2
16.6
13.9
10.8
6.6
13.7
25.2
49.0
44.1
39.5
31.4
CO2
3109
3120
3131
3137
3148
3154
3167
3155
3136
3096
3106
3115
3128
NOX
57.13
57.90
51.73
48.62
46.33
47.62
45.97
49.12
52.28
47.42
47.34
46.98
49.76
FULL LOAD - 13608
HC
15.97
12.51
11.82
8.78
6.95
5.88
4.59
4.86
4.34
5.93
5.16
4.68
4.77
CO
18.9
14.1
13.3
9.5
8.1
6.0
3.1
17.0
32.8
41.0
32.4
28.0
23.9
C02
3113
3132
3135
3151
3159
3165
3174
3151
3128
3110
3126
3135
3141
KG
NOX
54.92
55.29
52. 23
46.80
44.30
44.69
43.95
50.26
47.06
46.84
48.16
48.37
50.09
-------
APPENDIX E-l (Cont'd.)
TABLE 31-4. BUS 031 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
1972 CMC City Bus Detroit Diesel 6V- TIN GVW 13835 KG Project 11-41 33
EMPTY LOAD - 9752 KG
HALF LOAD - 1111 3 KG
FULL LOAD - 13608 KG
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
Rack,
RPM
550
520
680
900
1130
1140
1540
%
0
16.
40.
43.
46.
48.
57.
7
5
3
6
9
7
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
Period
20±5
30±5
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
81
82
91
92
93
94
25.0
44.0
51
52
61
62
63
64
RPM
550
520
720
960
1200
1160
1540
Rack,
%
0
16.1
40.0
43. 3
46.6
50.0
60.5
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Period
25.0
44.0
21
22
31
32
33
34
Rack,
RPM
550
520
700
940
1160
1160
1550
%
0
20.
40.
44.
47.
53.
64.
5
5
4
7
3
4
Period
25.
44.
0
0
-------
APPENDIX E-2
TABLE 32-1. BUS 032 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOMETRE
1975 MCI MC-5B Bus Detroit Diesel 8V-71N GVW 13699 KG Project 11-4133
M
i
0-
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
20±5
30±5
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD
HC
3.50
4.21
2.13
2.33
1.25
1.52
1.42
0.97
4.19
3.00
2.16
1.97
CO
5. 7
9.2
3.3
4.1
1.7
2.0
2.0
1.3
7.3
7.8
5.3
6.2
CO2
937
1365
819
866
616
733
1073
650
1947
1518
1229
1120
- 9752 KG
NOX
13.28
13.14
9.05
8.57
6.93
7.54
17.49
11.28
24.84
20.91
17.46
15.99
Fuel*
35.6
51.8
30.9
32.7
23.2
27.5
40.2
24. 4
73.3
57.3
46.3
42.3
HALF LOAD - 11113 KG
HC
3. 44
4.45
2. 24
2. 22
1.33
1.39
1.74
1.12
4.63
3.08
2.35
1.85
CO
5.7
7. 7
3.7
4.6
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.1
6.0
8.0
7.1
6.3
CO2
1044
1363
769
876
627
770
1159
723
2025
1491
1314
1140
NOX
14.36
12.65
8.24
8.41
7.05
7.90
18.42
12.06
27.60
22.53
17.91
16.74
Fuel*
39.6
51. 7
29.1
33.1
23.6
28.9
43.4
27.1
76.2
56.3
49.6
43.0
FULL LOAD - 13608 KG
HC
3.43
3.84
1.98
1.97
1.42
1.60
1.96
_
3.74
2.89
2.35
1.94
CO
5.5
8.2
2.9
3.2
2.0
1.7
2.4
_
6.7
9.8
8.0
8.3
C02
1008
1323
771
854
670
803
1365
_
2061
1720
1476
1332
NOX
13.12
11.11
8.06
7.86
7.33
8.18
21.90
_
29.16
23.64
20. 70
19.86
Fuel*
38. 2
50.1
29.1
32.2
25.2
30.2
51.1
_
77.5
64.9
55.6
50.3
*Fuel Consumption in Litre/100 km
XX SS - Steady State at designated speed
XX ± Y - Sinusoidal with designated average speed and amplitude
XX AVG. - Driving Cycle with designated average speed
-------
APPENDIX E-2 (Cont'd. )
TABLE 32-2. BUS 32 SUMMARY - GRAMS/MINUTE
1975 MCI MC-5B Bus Detroit Diesel 8V-71N GVW 13699 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
20±5
30±5
H
-!j 05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
13-FTP
13-FTP
EMPTY LOAD - 975.
HC
0.45
0. 56
1.12
0.85
1.26
1.02
1.63
0.78
0. 80
0.60
0. 85
0.85
1.07
CO
0.6
0. 9
2.5
1.3
2. 2
1. 4
2. 1
1. 1
1.1
1.0
2. 2
2.1
3.4
CO2
103
151
362
329
467
500
784
587
536
278
431
482
608
NOX
1.55
2.14
3.49
3.64
4.62
5.63
8.07
9.57
9.30
3.54
5. 94
6.84
8.70
2 KG
Fuel*
32.99
48. 27
115.88
104. 70
148.67
158.55
248.36
185.38
169.30
88.38
136.97
152.87
193.45
HALF LOAD -
HC
0.39
0.53
1.22
0.90
1.20
1.08
1.49
0.95
0.93
0.64
0.86
0.97
0.99
1.41
1.39
CO
0.5
0.9
2. 1
1.5
2.5
1.6
2.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
2.2
3.0
3.4
16.4
15.2
COz
102
160
373
309
472
510
824
633
601
282
416
546
608
1025
1022
11113 KG
NOX
1.54
2.19
3.46
3.31
4.53
5.73
8.45
10.05
10.05
3.84
6.30
7.44
8.91
16.71
16.67
Fuel*
32.66
50.98
119.08
98.60
150.38
161.62
260.66
199. 74
189.78
89.34
132.48
173.64
193.23
323.89
323.89
FULL LOAD -
HC
0.84
0.52
1.05
0.80
1.06
1.15
1.69
1.08
-
0.53
0. 77
0.95
1.01
CO
0.6
0.8
2. 2
1.2
1.8
1.6
1.8
1.3
-
0.9
2.6
3.2
4.3
CO2
100
154
362
310
460
539
853
755
-
292
459
597
691
13608 KG
NOX
1.52
2.01
3.04
3.24
4.24
5.90
8.69
12.12
-
4. 14
6.30
8.37
10.32
Fuel*
32.41
49.22
115.61
98.60
146.21
170. 76
269.99
238.39
-
92.65
145.95
189.67
219.69
*Fuel Consumption in Grams/Minute
13-FTP - 13-Mode Federal Test Procedure
-------
n
APPENDIX E-2 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 32-3. BUS 032 SUMMARY - GRAMS/KILOGRAM OF FUEL
1975 MCI MC-5B Bus Detroit Diesel 8V-71N GVW 13699 KG Project 11-4133
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
20±5
30±5
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
EMPTY LOAD - 9752 KG
HC
13.59
11.65
9.65
8.16
8.46
6.42
6.57
4.21
4.71
6.79
6.22
5.55
5.52
CO
17.9
19.2
21.2
12.6
15.0
8.6
8.5
5.8
6.3
11.8
16.1
13.6
17.5
CO2
3119
3124
3127
3145
3140
3156
3156
3168
3165
3150
3145
3151
3145
NOy
46.98
44.25
30.11
34.75
31.07
35.52
32.48
51.66
54.90
40.20
43.29
44.79
44.91
HALF LOAD - 11113 KG
HC
11.97
10.31
10.23
9.14
7.97
6.66
5.71
4.75
4.92
7.22
6.50
5.61
5.11
CO
15.4
17.0
17.6
15.0
16.5
9.6
8.0
5.2
5.0
9.4
16.8
17.1
17.4
CO2
3128
3131
3130
3138
3139
3154
3160
3167
3167
3153
3143
3146
3147
NOX
47.12
43. 05
29.07
33.60
30.15
35.44
32.44
50.37
52.89
42.99
47.52
42.90
46.17
FULL LOAD
HC
26.02
10.65
9.09
8.09
7.27
6.71
6.28
4.55
-
5.73
5.29
5.02
4.58
CO
17. 7
17.0
19.4
11. 7
12.0
9.4
6.7
5. 7
-
10.2
18.0
17.1
19.7
- 13608
coz
3081
3130
3131
3146
3149
3154
3160
3167
-
3156
3145
3148
3145
KG
NOX
46.80
40. 73
26.28
32.89
28.97
34.53
32.17
50.79
-
44.67
43.23
44.16
46.92
-------
APPENDIX E-2 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 32-4. BUS 032 SUMMARY - OPERATING DATA
1975 MCI MC-5B Bus Detroit Diesel 8V-71N GVW 13699 KG Project 11-4133
EMPTY LOAD - 9752 KG
HALF LOAD - 11113 KG
FULL LOAD - 13608 KG
Test
Desc.
00 SS
05 SS
10 SS
15 SS
20 SS
30 SS
40 SS
20±5
30±5
05 AVG.
10 AVG.
15 AVG.
20 AVG.
Test
No.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
81
82
91
92
93
94
Rack,
RPM %
525 0
600 0
1260 1.1
1000 3.3
1360 6.7
1200 11.7
1600 22.2
Period
17.0
31.0
Test
No.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
51
52
61
62
63
64
Rack,
RPM %
525 0
650 0
1280 0.6
1000 2.2
1360 6.1
1200 12.2
1600 23.9
Period
17.0
31.0
Test
No.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
RPM
525
650
1280
1000
1360
1200
1600
Rack,
%
0
0
0
1.7
3.3
14.4
27.8
Period
21
22
31
32
33
34
17.
31.
0
0
-------
APPENDIX E-3
M
o
TABLE 1.
MODIFIED IS-MODE EMISSIONS TEST
BUS 31 TEST 8 Oe-17-7b 1178
MODE
1
8
3
*
5
b
7
8
s
10
11
12
13
ENGINE
SPEED
RPM
550
18bO
18bO
18bO
I8bo
12bO
550
eioo
8100
8ioo
8100
SiOO
550
TORQUE POxER
LB-FT BMP
0.0 O.n
lb.7 t ,0
ItS. 9 35.0
300.1 78.0
t33.5 10*. 0
575,2 138.0
0.0 0.0
*77.7 111.0
357. b 1*3.0
8tO,l Ib.O
120.0 ta.o
3S.O lt.0
0.0 0.0
FUEL
FLUrt
LB/MIN
.05
.17
.88
.t7
.b3
.88
.05
1.87
1.00
. 77
.53
.38
.05
CMC CITy BUS
AIR
FLOW
LB/MIN
18.0s
88.55
88. bH
88. S3
88.37
87.73
11.88
*b,*8
tS.tS
*S,7b
tS.SO
tb.OS
11.58
EXHAUST
FLOW
LB/MIN
18.lt
88.78
88. S3
89, 3S
8S.OO
88. bl
11.87
t7.7S
tb.tS
tb.53
tfa.t3
tb,*t
11.57
DETROIT DIESEL bV-71N
FUEL
AIR
RATIO
.oot
.OOb
.010
.Olb
.088
.038
.00*
.087
.088
.017
,018
.008
,00t
MODE
1
2
3
*
5
b
7
8
S
10
11
18
13
CYCLE
HC
PPM
15b
1*0
Itt
It*
808
138
IbO
380
8bO
80S
180
180
1S8
Cu +
PPM
It7
1SS
Itb
138
8b3
21Sb
It?
5t3
Ibb.
180
181
188
It7
COMPOSITE
BSHC +
MOX + +
PPM
80S
IbS
337
585
SOS
770
ISb
13*
78t
tsi
251
IbS
IbS
BSMC =
BSCO+ =
8SN08++ z
BSN08+t*
BSFC =
WEIGHTED
8HP
o.no
.38
8,80
S.7b
8.38
11. Ot
0.00
15.88
11. tt
7.bB
3.8t
1.12
0,00
1.8bb
t.8S7
10,715
11.181
,tb2
BSHC
G/HP HR
H
13,8?
1.57
,'B
.77
,3b
«
I.Ob
l.U
1.33
2.3U
7.88
R
GRAM/BMP
GRAM/BMP
GRAM/BHP
GRAM/BHP
BSCOt
G/HP HN
R
30.08
3.1b
I,t8
1.13
11.17
R
3.57
I,t8
1.S3
3. US
10, bb
R
HR
HR
HR
HR
8SN08++
G/HP HR
H
51. IS
18,03
10,31
10. SS
b.SO
R
10, OS
11, OU
10.88
lo.et
8t.2i
R
HUM.
GR/L8
101.8
101.8
1U1 ,8
17.8
17.2
17.2
101. t
101. t
101. t
ib.e
ib.a
1b,8
17.8
LB/BHP HR
CONVERTED TO MET BASIS
CONVERTED TO WET BASIS,
CORRECTED TO 75 GRAINS OF WATER PER LB. OF DRY AIR
AND CORRECTED TO 85 DEC, F INLET TEMP. PER
FEDERAL REGISTER PARA. 85.17t-lB
MODE
1
8
3
*
5
b
7
8
S
10
11
18
13
FUEL
88.7
75. b
188.5
811.7
887.3
tOO. 7
88.7
57t.b
tsa.b
3*7.8
8tl.S
173. S
88.7
HC
f
•
•
•
1.
•
1
3.
2.
2.
1.
1.
•
»8
88
18
13
33
83
•»2
3b
bb
13
8t
8t
tl
RAMS/M]
CO
.8
2.0
1.8
1.7
3.3
27. S
.8
11. »
3.»
8.t
8.5
2.5
.7
COS
81.1
850.0
H88.S
b73.1
SIS. 7
1110. b
87.1
1803. b
ltbb.0
1135,8
80S.1
b!7,1
8S.O
NO?
1.8
3.t
7.0
12. t
11.0
15.1
1.7
32.1
8b.2
lb.5
8.7
5.7
l.t
CYCLE COMPOSITE
FUEL
l.S
b.O
10.3
lfa.1
23.0
32.1
1.5
fb.O
3b.3
27.8
11. t
13.1
1.5
HC- FID *
CO- NDIR *
C02-NDIR e
N08-CL =
FUEL *1. =
HC
.03
.07
.07
.07
.11
.07
.03
.87
.21
.17
.15
.15
,03
l.»3
H.8t
7bD,77
12.07
83b,80
'ED GRAMS
CO
.1
.2
.1
.1
.3
2.2
.1
.1
.3
.2
.2
.2
.1
G/MIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
C02
b.O
20.0
at. 3
53,1
73.3
15.8
5.8
It*. 3
117,3
10.8
b*.7
tl.t
5.7
NOZ
.1
.3
.b
1.0
1.5
1.3
.1
2.b
2.1
1.3
.7
.5
.1
b7.bO
-------
APPENDIX E-3 (Cont'd.)
TABLE 2- MODIFIER 13-MODE EMISSIONS TEST
BUS 32 TEST 1 02-27-76 1S7S MCI MC-5B BUS DETROIT DIESEL 8E ni.
PPM
1
£
3
t
5
b
7
B
S
10
11
12
13
CrCLE
101
120
121
152
17b
181
S2
1S2
1 ?b
158
lit
lit
120
CO*
PPM
12t
its
7b
73
113
B8bO
SB
Ib 13
113
72
72
71
SS
COMPUS1 TE
BSMC +
NOX + t 1
PPM
152
101
218
530
171
S81
13B
122S
S91
IbS
211
lit
120
8SHC =
BSCO-f =
HSN02++=
BSN02++=
BSFC =
-EIG
MTtD
BMP
n .
.
3.
V .
10 .
It.
n .
21 .
Ib.
10.
5.
1.
0.
.
10.
10.
11 .
.
nu
t B
52
20
72
21
00
bO
21
80
11
11
no
S22
b18
S37
8bO
1b7
BSHC
G/MP Mk fi
h
S. 15
1 . 31
.Be
.b3
.50
h
.57
.b7
.8S
1 .fab
b. 3b
H
GRAM/BHP
GRAM/BHP
GRAM/BMP
GRAM/BHP
LB/BHP HR
bSCU + BSNDStt
/Mr MR
H
21 . b3
1 ,b3
. 7H
1.02
18. Ib
H
i.b2
1.01
.81
l.bb
b.SO
R
nR
HR
hh
HR
(,/Hp MR
21
H
;)
11
8
12
12
8
B
Ib
H
.11
. ''ij
. 3H
. tt
.7b
k
.01
.13
.51
.73
.11
|.
HUM.
GH/LB
57.8
57.8
b?.8
53.2
53.2
53.2
St.S
51.1
51. b
51. b
51. b
55.0
+ CONVERTED TO WET BASIS
++ CONVERTED TO WET BASIS,
CORRECTED TO 75 GRAINS OF WATER PER LB. OF DRY AIR
AND CORRECTED TO 85 DEG. F INLET TEMP. P£K
FEDERAL REGISTER PARA. B5.S71-18
MODE
1
2
3
1
5
b
7
8
S
10
11
12
13
FUEL
22.7
83.2
Ibb. 3
272.2
385. b
5BS.7
22.7
8tb.7
bS0.2
IfeB. 7
317.5
211.7
22.7
HC
.31
.SS
,sq
1.23
1.10
l.f
.30
2.SS
2.28
2. no
1.8S
1 . SI
.38
RAMS/MI
CO
.8
2.5
1.2
1.2
2.3
112. S
.b
13.3
3.7
1.8
l.S
2.0
.b
C02
102.1
321.8
510. S
8S1.S
1200.5
IbSl. 7
SS.1
2b05.8
2058.2
1155. b
lOBb.3
753. S
S5.1
N02
l.b
2.S
b.5
11.1
25.5
2h.O
1.5
51.2
12.0
1 S.2
S.S
1 . S
1.2
CYCLE COMPOSITE
FUEL
l.S
b.7
13.3
21.8
30.8
17.2
l.S
b7.7
52.0
37.5
25.1
Ib.S
1.5
HC- FID =
CO- NDIR =
C02-NDIR =
N02-CL =
FUEL WT. =
HC
.02
.08
.OB
.10
.11
.12
.02
.21
.18
.Ib
.15
.15
.03
1.11
lb.35
1025.13
lb.71
323. 8S
'ED GRAMS/
CO
.1
.2
.1
. 1
.2
11.1
.0
3.5
. 3
.1
.2
.2
.0
G/MIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
G/MIN
(i/MIN
C02
b.8
25. 7
13.3
71. b
Sb.O
132.1
b.7
2U8.S
lbt.7
lib. t
Bb.S
bO.3
b. t
N02
1
2
2
t
3
1
.1
.2
.5
. 1
.0
.1
.1
.3
. t
.5
.8
. t
.1
HP
Sl.bg
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
/Please read InHj-Ltctions on the reverse before completing/
1 REPORT NO. 2.
EPA-460/3-76-012
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
STUDY OF EMISSIONS FROM
HEAVY DUTY VEHICLES
7. AUTHOR(S)
Charles M. Urban and Karl J. Springer
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Southwest Research Institute
Post Office Drawer 28510
8500 Culebra Road
San Antonio, Texas 78284
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air and Waste Management
Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
Emission Control Technology Division
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSI ON" NO.
5 REPORT DATE
May 1976
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
AR 1078
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
Contract No. 68-03-2147
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final Report
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
In this project, exhaust emissions data were obtained from heavy-duty
vehicles operated on chassis dynamometers. A total of 32 vehicles were evaluated,
ranging from 7700 kg (17, 000 Ibs) to 33, 000 kg (73, 000 Ibs) gross vehicle weight
(GVW). The vehicles included eighteen gasoline trucks (or truck-tractors), twelve
diesel trucks (or truck-tractors) and two diesel buses. The evaluations involved
an on-the-road determination for setting dynamometer power and the evaluation on
chassis dynamometers of several steady-state, sinusoidal and driving cycle oper-
ating conditions. Chassis version nine-mode or thirteen-mode evaluations were
conducted as appropriate on all vehicles. Each of the vehicles were evaluated at
three different inertia weights and dynamometer road-load settings to simulate an
empty vehicle, half payload, and full rated GVW. On two gasoline and two diesel
vehicles, the entire emissions test sequence was repeated and determinations were
made using alternate driving cycles. Results are summarized by truck for each
test method
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
Exhaust emissions
Spark ignition engines
Diesel engines
Hydrocarbons
Carbon monoxide
Nitrogen oxides
b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDEDTERMS
Heavy duty vehicles
Heavy duty engines
Vehicle driveability
Emis sions test pro-
cedure
COSATI Field/Group
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release unlimited
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
Unclassified
21. NO OF PAGES
253
20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
Unclassified
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
-------
INSTRUCTIONS
1. REPORT NUMBER
Insert ihe EPA report number as it appears on the cover of the publication.
2. LEAVE BLANK
3. RECIPIENTS ACCESSION NUMBER
Reserved for use by each report recipient.
Title should indicate clearly and briefly the subject coverage of the report, and be displayed prominently. Set subtitle, if used, in smaller
type or otherwise subordinate it to main title. When a report is prepared in more than one volume, repeat the primary title, add volume
number and include subtitle for the specific title.
5. REPORT DATE , ,. , ,
Each report shall carry a date indicating at least month and year. Indicate the basis on which it was selected (e.g., date of issue, date oj
approve!, date of preparation, etc.).
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
Leave blank.
7. AUTHOR(S)
Give name(s) in conventional order {John R. Doe, J. Robert Doe, etc.]. List author's affiliation if it differs from the performing organi-
zation.
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER
Insert if performing organization wishes to assign this number.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Give name, street, city, state, and ZIP code. List no more than two levels of an organizational hirearchy.
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER
Use the program element number under which the report was prepared. Subordinate numbers may be included in parentheses.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NUMBER
Insert contract or grant number under which report was prepared.
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
Include ZIP code.
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Indicate interim final, etc., and if applicable, dates covered.
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
Leave blank.
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
Enter information not included elsewhere but useful, such as: Prepared in cooperation with, Translation of, Presented at conference of,
To be published in, Supersedes, Supplements, etc.
16. ABSTRACT
Include a brief (200 words or less) factual summary of the most significant information contained in the report. If the report contains a
significant bibliography or literature survey, mention it here.
17. KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
(a) DESCRIPTORS - Select from the Thesaurus of Engineering and Scientific Terms the proper authorized terms that identify the major
concept of the research and axe sufficiently specific and precise to be used as index entries for cataloging.
(b) IDENTIFIERS AND OPEN-ENDED TERMS - Use identifiers for project names, code names, equipment designators, etc. Use open-
ended terms written in descriptor form for those subjects for which no descriptor exists.
(c) COSAT1 FIELD GROUP - Field and group assignments are to be taken from the 1965 COSATI Subject Category List. Since the ma-
jority of documents are multidisciplinary in nature, the Primary Field/Group assignment(s) will be specific discipline, area of human
endeavor, or type of physical object. The application(s) will be cross-referenced with secondary Field/Group assignments that will follow
the primary posting(s).
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Denote releasjbility to the public or limitation for reasons other than security for example "Release Unlimited." Cite any availability to
the public, with address and price.
19. & 20. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION
DO NOT submit classified reports to the National Technical Information service.
21. NUMBER OF PAGES
Insert the total number of pages, including this one and unnumbered pages, but exclude distribution list, if any.
22. PRICE
Inseri the price set by the Vnional Technical Information Service or the Government Printing Office, if known.
EPA Form 222O-1 (9-73) (Reverie)
------- |